Category: Eurozone

  • MIL-OSI: CoinShares Asset Management Becomes First Continental European Regulated Asset Manager to Receive MiCA Authorisation

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    First major European asset manager to combine MiCA, MiFID, and AIFM authorisations – creating new investment possibilities across €33 trillion European asset management market

    23 July 2025 | SAINT HELIER, Jersey | CoinShares International Limited (“CoinShares” or “the Group”) (Nasdaq Stockholm: CS; US OTCQX: CNSRF), the European leading investment company specialising in digital assets with over $9 billion in assets under management, today announced its French subsidiary, CoinShares Asset Management, has received authorisation under the Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) Regulation, making it the first continental European regulated asset management company to achieve this milestone.

    This authorisation positions CoinShares as the only asset management firm in continental Europe to hold a rare triple regulatory license combination, enabling comprehensive investment services across all asset classes throughout the European Union:

    • AIFM License – Alternative Investment Fund Management and delegated UCITS management
    • MiFID License – Portfolio management and investment advice on traditional financial instruments
    • MiCA Authorisation – Portfolio management and advice on crypto-assets

    Setting New Standards for Professional Crypto Asset Management

    The MiCA authorisation enables CoinShares to provide institutional-grade portfolio management services across all asset classes and investment vehicle types throughout the EU, with operations currently passported in France, Germany, Cyprus, Ireland, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, and the Netherlands, with possibility to extend across all EU member states.

    This regulatory achievement directly addresses a critical gap in the European crypto investment landscape, where many platforms present themselves as asset managers without the proper licensing, organisational structure, or necessary separation of duties between custody, administration, execution, and portfolio management functions.

    Jean-Marie Mognetti, Co-Founder and CEO of CoinShares commented: “Receiving MiCA authorisation from the AMF is a pivotal milestone, not just for CoinShares, but for the entire European digital asset industry. For too long, asset managers operating in crypto have been confined to partial or improvised regulatory frameworks. With MiCA, we now have a clear, harmonised structure across the EU, and CoinShares is proud to be the first in continental Europe to meet that standard as a fully regulated asset manager.

    This authorisation sends a strong signal: crypto is here to stay and it belongs within a professional, transparent, and investor-centric regulatory environment. CoinShares has always believed that innovation and regulation can go hand in hand. As a publicly listed company, our commitment to governance, accountability, and excellence is now matched by a regulatory foundation that enables us to serve our clients across all asset classes, from traditional to digital.”

    Unique Market Position

    The comprehensive regulatory framework positions the Group as the only firm in continental Europe capable of:

    • Providing genuine professional active management services across both traditional and digital assets
    • Offering services through clients’ preferred platforms with proper segregation of custody and management duties
    • Delivering institutional-grade portfolio management with EU regulatory oversight
    • Serving as a regulated counterparty for institutional investors requiring compliance with fiduciary standards

    About CoinShares

    CoinShares is a leading global digital asset manager that delivers a broad range of financial services across investment management, trading, and securities to a wide array of clients that include corporations, financial institutions, and individuals. Founded in 2013, the firm is headquartered in Jersey, with offices in France, Stockholm, the UK, and the US. CoinShares is regulated in Jersey by the Jersey Financial Services Commission, in France by the Autorité des marchés financiers, and in the US by the Securities and Exchange Commission, National Futures Association and Financial Industry Regulatory Authority. CoinShares is publicly listed on the Nasdaq Stockholm under the ticker CS and the OTCQX under the ticker CNSRF.

    For more information on CoinShares, please visit: https://coinshares.com
    Company | +44 (0)1534 513 100 | enquiries@coinshares.com
    Investor Relations | +44 (0)1534 513 100 | enquiries@coinshares.com

    Press Contact

    CoinShares
    Benoît Pellevoizin
    bpellevoizin@coinshares.com

    M Group Strategic Communications
    Peter Padovano
    coinshares@mgroupsc.com

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-Evening Report: Gaza – an open question for NZ’s foreign minister Winston Peters

    OPEN QUESTION: By Bryan Bruce

    Dear Rt Hon Winston Peters,

    There was a time when New Zealanders stood up for what was morally right. There are memorials around our country for those who died fighting fascism, we wrote parts of the UN Charter of Human Rights, we took an anti-nuclear stance in 1984, and three years prior to that, many of us stood against apartheid in South Africa by boycotting South African products and actively protesting against the 1981 Springbok Rugby Tour.

    To call out the Israeli government for genocide and ethnic cleansing in Gaza is not to be antisemitic. Nor is it to be pro- Hamas. It is to simply to be pro-human.

    While acknowledging the peace and humanitarian initiatives on the Foreign Affairs website, I note there is no calling out of the genocide and ethnic cleansing that cannot be denied is happening in Gaza.

    The Israeli government is systematically demolishing whole towns and cities — including churches, mosques, even removing trees and vegetation — to deprive the Palestinian people the opportunity to return to their homeland; and there have been constant blocks to humanitarian aid as part of a policy forced starvation.

    There is no doubt crimes against international law have been committed, which is why the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague has issued warrants for the arrest of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Yoav Gallant, his former defence minister, for alleged crimes against humanity.

    So, my question to you is: why are you not pictured standing in this photograph (below) alongside the representatives from 33 nations at the July 16 2025 Gaza emergency conference in Bogotá?

    The nations that took part in the Gaza emergency summit in were:

    Norway, Portugal, Slovenia, Spain, Turkey, Colombia, South Africa, Bolivia, Cuba, Honduras, Malaysia, Namibia, Algeria, Bangladesh, Botswana, Brazil, Chile, China, Djibouti, Indonesia, Iraq, Ireland, Lebanon, Libya, Mexico, Nicaragua, Oman, Pakistan, Palestine, Qatar, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Uruguay and Venezuela.

    Representatives from 33 nations at the July 16 2025 Gaza emergency conference in Bogotá. Image: bryanbruce.substack.com

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-Evening Report: Gaza – an open question for NZ’s foreign minister Winston Peters

    OPEN QUESTION: By Bryan Bruce

    Dear Rt Hon Winston Peters,

    There was a time when New Zealanders stood up for what was morally right. There are memorials around our country for those who died fighting fascism, we wrote parts of the UN Charter of Human Rights, we took an anti-nuclear stance in 1984, and three years prior to that, many of us stood against apartheid in South Africa by boycotting South African products and actively protesting against the 1981 Springbok Rugby Tour.

    To call out the Israeli government for genocide and ethnic cleansing in Gaza is not to be antisemitic. Nor is it to be pro- Hamas. It is to simply to be pro-human.

    While acknowledging the peace and humanitarian initiatives on the Foreign Affairs website, I note there is no calling out of the genocide and ethnic cleansing that cannot be denied is happening in Gaza.

    The Israeli government is systematically demolishing whole towns and cities — including churches, mosques, even removing trees and vegetation — to deprive the Palestinian people the opportunity to return to their homeland; and there have been constant blocks to humanitarian aid as part of a policy forced starvation.

    There is no doubt crimes against international law have been committed, which is why the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague has issued warrants for the arrest of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Yoav Gallant, his former defence minister, for alleged crimes against humanity.

    So, my question to you is: why are you not pictured standing in this photograph (below) alongside the representatives from 33 nations at the July 16 2025 Gaza emergency conference in Bogotá?

    The nations that took part in the Gaza emergency summit in were:

    Norway, Portugal, Slovenia, Spain, Turkey, Colombia, South Africa, Bolivia, Cuba, Honduras, Malaysia, Namibia, Algeria, Bangladesh, Botswana, Brazil, Chile, China, Djibouti, Indonesia, Iraq, Ireland, Lebanon, Libya, Mexico, Nicaragua, Oman, Pakistan, Palestine, Qatar, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Uruguay and Venezuela.

    Representatives from 33 nations at the July 16 2025 Gaza emergency conference in Bogotá. Image: bryanbruce.substack.com

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • England fight back to down Italy in extra time and reach Euro 2025 final

    Source: Government of India

    Source: Government of India (2)

    hloe Kelly fired home the rebound from her own penalty to net a 119th-minute winner as reigning champions England pulled off a stunning comeback to beat Italy 2-1 after extra time on Tuesday and reach the Women’s European Championship final.

    England fell behind in the first half but hit back to level through Michelle Agyemang six minutes into second-half stoppage time and when Emma Severini pulled down Beth Mead in the box in extra time, Kelly grabbed the chance to decide the game.

    Her first effort was saved but she was quick off the mark to rifle in the rebound and send England through to the final where they will face either Spain or Germany.

    After a come-from-behind penalty shootout win over Sweden in the quarter-finals, England again flirted with disaster, but their late surge floored Italy, whose hopes of reaching a first final since 1997 were crushed.

    The win propelled England into a third successive major final after their Euro 2022 success and World Cup loss to Spain the following year.

    With the Italians riding a wave of confidence after a last-minute winner against Norway in their quarter-final, they defended brilliantly and attacked incisively on the break.

    Their persistence paid off in the 33rd minute of a gritty semi-final when a ball from the right found its way to Barbara Bonansea, who took a touch before lashing it into the roof of the net.

    England then dominated possession and created a slew of chances as the Italians rode their luck, but too often the English attackers unleashed shots from distance that were easily dealt with or flew harmlessly over the bar.

    With their hopes of defending their title slowly slipping away, 19-year-old substitute Agyemang snapped up a loose ball in the box and fired home to send the game to extra time.

    Agyemang almost scored again with an effort deep into the second half of the extra period, out-sprinting and out-muscling the Italian defence only to see her deft lob towards goal bounce back off the crossbar.

    Sensing that they could avoid a repeat of their quarter-final penalty shootout against Sweden, England poured forward and reaped their reward when Mead was fouled in the box, but there was one more twist in the tale.

    Kelly took her usual prancing run-up, but Italy keeper Laura Giuliani kept her nerve and saved, only for the England winger to score from the follow-up and seal her side’s spot in Sunday’s final in Basel.

    “I just tried my best for the team. It wasn’t supposed to go like that, that penalty, but (I was) ready for the rebound and ready for any opportunity given to me wearing an England badge,” a delighted Kelly said.

    England defender Lucy Bronze said they had been forced to dig deep to reach the final.

    “Yeah, we don’t know if it’s the easy way it seems this tournament, but we find a way to win,” she said.

    “I think it was the 96th minute and then the 118th minute … we just … found a way to get the goals and get the ball (in) the last minute.”

    For Italy, who had defended superbly until England’s equaliser, the loss was a devastating blow.

    “Obviously, going out like this hurts a lot. Having stood up to the champions should give us a lot of confidence for the future. There are no words to describe the emotions we have experienced on this journey,” coach Andrea Soncin said.

    “This evening, for as hard as the girls fought, we definitely deserved a different ending. Many difficult situations to comment on. It’s sad, but I am and we are very proud.”

    (Reuters)

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: UK sanctions notorious people-smuggling gangs and their enablers in global crackdown

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments 3

    Press release

    UK sanctions notorious people-smuggling gangs and their enablers in global crackdown

    Gang ring leaders, key intermediaries and suppliers of people-smuggling equipment have today [July 23] been hit with the first ever sanctions targeting irregular migration by the UK.

    • UK sanctions 25 targets at the heart of people-smuggling networks that drive irregular migration to the UK. 
    • Sanctions come on day 1 of the UK’s world-first dedicated sanctions regime targeting irregular migration and organised immigration crime. 
    • Action marks latest step in government’s campaign to secure Britain’s borders and reduce irregular migration, delivering on the Plan for Change.  

    Gang ring leaders, key intermediaries and suppliers of people-smuggling equipment have today [July 23] been hit with the first ever sanctions targeting irregular migration by the UK. 
     
    Today’s sanctions target individuals and entities involved in people-smuggling and driving irregular migration to the UK, from a small boat supplier in Asia, to informal Hawala money movers in the Middle East, to gang leaders based in the Balkans and North Africa. 

    They cover a range of different activities from supplying small boats explicitly for smuggling, to sourcing fake passports, middlemen facilitating illicit payments through Hawala, people-smuggling via lorries and small boats, and the gangland leaders themselves. 

    Sanctions can disrupt the flow of money and materials – including freezing property, bank accounts and other assets – which allow organised criminal gangs to operate this vile trade.  
     
    The plans are a key example of the FCDO using innovative foreign policy approaches to deliver on the government’s Plan for Change. The regime will be the world’s first dedicated to targeting people-smuggling and organised immigration crime, with the exploitation of vulnerable people by criminals and their associated networks being one of the key drivers of irregular migration to the UK. 

    Foreign Secretary David Lammy said:  

    This is a landmark moment in the government’s work to tackle organised immigration crime, reduce irregular migration to the UK and deliver on the Plan for Change. 

    From Europe to Asia we are taking the fight to the people-smugglers who enable irregular migration, targeting them wherever they are in the world and making them pay for their actions.  

    My message to the gangs who callously risk vulnerable lives for profit is this: we know who you are, and we will work with our partners around the world to hold you to account. 

    Among those sanctioned today is Bledar Lala, an Albanian who is in control of the ‘Belgium operations’ of an organised criminal group which smuggles migrants from Belgium across the English Channel to the United Kingdom.

    Sanctions have also been brought against a company in China which has advertised their small boats on an online marketplace explicitly for the purpose of people-smuggling. The boats advertised are of the type used by criminal gangs in which migrants are packed, before being sent across the Channel at huge risk.

    The UK is also sanctioning Alen Basil, a former police translator who went on to lead a large smuggling network in Serbia, terrorising refugees, with the aid of corrupt policemen. Basil was subsequently found to be living in a house in Serbia worth more than one million euros, bought with money extorted from countless desperate migrants. 

    Also sanctioned is Mohammed Tetwani, the self-styled “King of Horgos”, who brutally oversaw a migrant camp in Horgos, Serbia and led the Tetwani people-smuggling gang. Tetwani and his followers are known for their violent treatment of refugees who decline their services or cannot pay for them. 

    Today’s package also includes individuals like Muhammed Khadir Pirot, a hawala banker involved in informal money transfer networks, which people-smugglers use as a way of taking payment from migrants.

    All of those sanctioned today are publicly named and barred from engaging with the UK financial system, helping to further undermine their operations. 

    NCA Director General Graeme Biggar said: 

    The NCA is determined to use every tool at our disposal to target, disrupt and dismantle the criminal networks involved in people-smuggling, preventing harm to those they exploit for profit and protecting the UK’s border security.    

    These new sanctions powers will complement that NCA activity. We have worked with the FCDO and partners to progress the designation of these sanctioned persons.   

    They will give the UK a new way of pursuing, undermining and frustrating the operational capability of a wide range of organised immigration crime networks, including those who facilitate or enable offending.

    Today’s designations are the first made under the UK’s new Global Irregular Migration Sanctions Regime. The regime is a world first and empowers the FCDO to impose sanctions not only on individuals and entities involved in people-smuggling to the UK, but also any financiers and companies found to be enabling their activities.

    The FCDO has worked closely with the National Crime Agency and other partners to develop its cases and ensure they complement law enforcement activity. 

    Today’s announcement is part of the FCDO’s three-pronged ‘disrupt, deter, return’ strategy to tackle irregular migration globally. In addition to disrupting organised immigration crime networks through sanctions, the FCDO works with source and transit countries to deter would-be migrants from making a dangerous journey in the first place and works with the Home Office to negotiate the return of people who have no right to be here to their countries of origin, including criminals and failed asylum seekers. Since the election, over 35,000 people have been returned, up 13% on the same period in the year before. 

    Background

    The individuals and entities sanctioned today can be seen below:

    Iraqi-linked people-smuggling 

    • Goran Assad Jalal, formed part of an organised crime group which stowed migrants in refrigerated lorries which crossed the English Channel from France to the United Kingdom on at least ten occasions between January and March 2019. 

    • Hemin Ali Salih, helped smuggle migrants into the UK in the backs of lorries. 

    • Dedawan Dazey, a people-smuggler who runs safe houses for migrants in Northern France before they are smuggled to the United Kingdom. 

    • Roman Ranyaye, an Iraqi people-smuggler responsible for the smuggling of migrants from Asia to Europe.   

    • Azad Khoshnaw, for supplying inflatable boats, onboard motors and other maritime equipment for use in people-smuggling of migrants from France to the UK.  

    • Nuzad Khoshnaw, for equipping gangs in Northern France with outboard motors, inflatable boats, and other maritime equipment for use in people-smuggling to the UK.  

    • Nihad Mohsin Xoshnaw, for providing inflatable boats, outboard motors and other maritime equipment used by migrants to cross the English Channel from France. 

    Hawala Network 

    • Muhammed Khadir Pirot, a hawala banker who controls payments from people being smuggled from the Kurdistan region of Iraq to Europe via Turkey. 

    • Mariwan Jamal, controls money movements through a Hawala banker, which handles payments to people smugglers from migrants in Iraq. 

    • Rafiq Shaqlaway, involved in hawala banking as an advisor to migrants looking to pay smugglers operating routes into Europe via Turkey. 

    North African gangs operating in the Balkans 

    • Kazawi Gang, a people-smuggling network which controls people-smuggling routes from North Africa into the EU known to deal out harsh punishments to migrants who are unable to pay.   

    • Tetwani Gang, known as one of the Balkan’s most violent people-smuggling gangs, members are reported to hold migrants for ransom and sexually abuse women unable to pay their fees. 

    Gangland bosses 

    • Bledar Lala, leads a smuggling ring moving people from Belgium across the English Channel to the UK.  

    • Alen Basil, a former police translator who through violence and intimidation became boss of a large people-smuggling network. 

    • Mohammed Tetwani, the head of the ‘Tetwani’ gang and self-styled “King” of Horgos in Serbia. 

    • Yassine Al Maghribi Al-Kasaoui, the boss of the “Kazawi” gang. 

    Balkan gangs supplying fake passports 

    • Kavač Gang, a Balkan organised crime organisation known to use fake passports to smuggle its gang members between the Balkans and Turkey. 

    • Škaljari Gang, an organised crime organisation in Montenegro that smuggles criminals between the Balkans and Turkey. 

    • Dalibor Ćurlik, procures fake passports and forged documents for use in the Kavač gang’s people-smuggling. 

    • Almir Jahović, member of the Kavač gang, which is involved in supplying fake passports for smuggling gang members across borders 

    • Marko Petrović, a member of the Kavač gang which sources false identification and passports for use in people-smuggling.  

    • Nikola Vein helps the Škaljari Gang secure fake passports and travel documents for use in people smuggling. 

    • Ratko Živković, a Škaljari Gang associate, which gathers fake passports for the purpose of smuggling gang members across borders. 

    • Dejan Pavlović, a member or close associate of the Škaljari Gang, which supports the manufacture of false identities and passports.  

    The following company based in China has been designated over the manufacture of inflatable boats being advertised for people smuggling.  

    • Weihai Yamar Outdoors Product Co 

    Background to the Global Irregular Migration sanctions regime 

    • Using the powers conferred by the Sanctions and Anti-Money Laundering Act (the Sanctions Act) the Government has laid secondary legislation before Parliament that introduces a new Global Irregular Migration sanctions regime. The Regulations will be debated by both Houses of Parliament when they return from the summer recess in line with the made affirmative procedure.   

    • The UK Sanctions List FCDO – UK Sanctions List Search – GOV.UK 

    Asset freeze 

    • An asset freeze prevents any UK citizen, or any business in the UK, from dealing with any funds or economic resources which are owned, held or controlled by the designated person. UK financial sanctions apply to all persons within the territory and territorial sea of the UK and to all UK persons, wherever they are in the world. It also prevents funds or economic resources being provided to or for the benefit of the designated person.

    Travel ban 

    • A travel ban means that the designated person must be refused leave to enter or to remain in the United Kingdom, providing the individual is an excluded person under section 8B of the Immigration Act 1971.

    Director disqualifications 

    • Where director disqualification sanctions apply, it will be an offence for a person designated for the purpose of those sanctions to act as a director of a company or to take part in the management, formation or promotion of a UK company.

    Media enquiries

    Email newsdesk@fcdo.gov.uk

    Telephone 020 7008 3100

    Email the FCDO Newsdesk (monitored 24 hours a day) in the first instance, and we will respond as soon as possible.

    Updates to this page

    Published 23 July 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI: BAWAG Group publishes Q2 2025 results: Net profit € 210 million and RoTCE 27.6%, full year outlook reconfirmed

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    VIENNA, Austria – July 23, 2025 – Today, BAWAG Group released its results for the second quarter 2025, reporting a net profit of € 210 million, earnings per share of € 2.65, and a RoTCE of 27.6%. Pre-provision profits were at € 345 million and the cost-income ratio at 37.5%. This resulted in a net profit of € 411 million, earnings per share of € 5.19, and a RoTCE of 26.7% for the first half of 2025.

    The CET1 ratio was at 13.5% after deducting the share buyback of € 175 million and the dividend accrual of € 226 million for the first half 2025. The NPL ratio remained at a low level of 0.7% at the end of the second quarter, reflecting our consistently strong asset quality.

    The operating performance of our business remained solid during the second quarter 2025. The ECB policy rates have come down further with average 3-month Euribor down by 50 basis points in the second quarter compared to the prior quarter. We reconfirm our outlook across P&L lines as well as our full year and mid-term targets, as presented during the Investor Day on March 4, 2025.

    Anas Abuzaakouk, CEO, commented: “We delivered another strong quarter with net profit of € 210 million, EPS of € 2.65, and a return on tangible common equity of 28% while continuing to integrate our recent acquisitions, which are progressing well. The operating performance of our businesses across the Group was solid, but we continue to be patient and disciplined with € 15 billion cash, over 20% of our balance sheet, in a market environment where we believe credit is frothy. We also received regulatory approval for a share buyback of € 175 million, in line with our capital distribution target of over 13% through 2025, landing at a CET1 ratio of 13.5% after deducting the buyback in the second quarter. 

    As always, our success was not possible without our team members across BAWAG Group who work tirelessly on behalf of our customers, shareholders, and the communities we serve. Their dedication, passion, and relentless pursuit of excellence set us apart. I’m incredibly proud of what we’ve achieved together – and even more excited about what lies ahead.”           

    The earnings presentation is available on https://www.bawaggroup.com.

    Delivering strong H1 2025 results as a larger group

    in € million Q2 ’25 Change vs prior year (in %) H1’25 Change vs prior year (in %)
    Core revenues 547.9 40 1,082.7 38
    Net interest income 457.6 45 903.4 43
    Net commission income 90.3 19 179.3 18
    Operating income 551.9 41 1,085.7 40
    Operating expenses (206.7) 62 (404.3) 59
    Pre-provision profit 345.2 31 681.4 31
    Regulatory charges (10.4) >100 (20.0) >100
    Risk costs (52.0) 86 (111.2) 92
    Profit before tax 283.9 22 551.9 21
    Net profit 210.2 20 411.2 20
             
    RoTCE 27.6% 3.3pts 26.7% 2.7pts
    CIR 37.5% 4.9pts 37.2% 4.4pts
    Earnings per share (€) 2.65 20% 5.19 20%
    Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR) 237% 17pts 237% 17pts

    Earnings presentation
    BAWAG Group will host the earnings call with our CEO Anas Abuzaakouk and CFO Enver Siručić at 10 a.m. CEST on 23 July 2025. The webcast details are available on our website under Financial Results | BAWAG Group.

    About BAWAG Group
    BAWAG Group AG is a publicly listed holding company headquartered in Vienna, Austria, serving our over 4 million retail, small business, corporate, real estate and public sector customers across Austria, Germany, Switzerland, Netherlands, Ireland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. The Group operates under various brands and across multiple channels offering comprehensive savings, payment, lending, leasing, investment, building society, factoring and insurance products and services. Our goal is to deliver simple, transparent, and affordable financial products and services that our customers need.

    BAWAG Group’s Investor Relations website https://www.bawaggroup.com/ir contains further information, including financial and other information for investors.

    Forward-looking statement
    This release contains “forward-looking statements” regarding the financial condition, results of operations, business plans and future performance of BAWAG Group. Words such as “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “expects,” “forecasts,” “intends,” “plans,” “projects,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “would,” “could” and other similar expressions are intended to identify these forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements reflect management’s expectations as of the date hereof and are subject to risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially from those projected. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, economic conditions, the regulatory environment, loan concentrations, vendors, employees, technology, competition, and interest rates. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the forward-looking statements as actual results may differ materially from the results predicted. Neither BAWAG Group nor any of its affiliates, advisors or representatives shall have any liability whatsoever (in negligence or otherwise) for any loss howsoever arising from any use of this report or its content or otherwise arising in connection with this document. This report does not constitute an offer or invitation to purchase or subscribe for any securities and neither it nor any part of it shall form the basis of or be relied upon in connection with any contract or commitment whatsoever. This statement is included for the express purpose of invoking “safe harbor provisions”.

    Financial Community:
    Jutta Wimmer (Head of Investor Relations)
    Tel: +43 (0) 5 99 05-22474

    IR Hotline: +43 (0) 5 99 05-34444
    E-mail: investor.relations@bawaggroup.com

    Media:
    Manfred Rapolter (Head of Corporate Communications & Social Engagement)
    Tel: +43 (0) 5 99 05-31210
    E-mail: communications@bawaggroup.com

    This text can also be downloaded from our website: https://www.bawaggroup.com

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI: BAWAG Group publishes Q2 2025 results: Net profit € 210 million and RoTCE 27.6%, full year outlook reconfirmed

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    VIENNA, Austria – July 23, 2025 – Today, BAWAG Group released its results for the second quarter 2025, reporting a net profit of € 210 million, earnings per share of € 2.65, and a RoTCE of 27.6%. Pre-provision profits were at € 345 million and the cost-income ratio at 37.5%. This resulted in a net profit of € 411 million, earnings per share of € 5.19, and a RoTCE of 26.7% for the first half of 2025.

    The CET1 ratio was at 13.5% after deducting the share buyback of € 175 million and the dividend accrual of € 226 million for the first half 2025. The NPL ratio remained at a low level of 0.7% at the end of the second quarter, reflecting our consistently strong asset quality.

    The operating performance of our business remained solid during the second quarter 2025. The ECB policy rates have come down further with average 3-month Euribor down by 50 basis points in the second quarter compared to the prior quarter. We reconfirm our outlook across P&L lines as well as our full year and mid-term targets, as presented during the Investor Day on March 4, 2025.

    Anas Abuzaakouk, CEO, commented: “We delivered another strong quarter with net profit of € 210 million, EPS of € 2.65, and a return on tangible common equity of 28% while continuing to integrate our recent acquisitions, which are progressing well. The operating performance of our businesses across the Group was solid, but we continue to be patient and disciplined with € 15 billion cash, over 20% of our balance sheet, in a market environment where we believe credit is frothy. We also received regulatory approval for a share buyback of € 175 million, in line with our capital distribution target of over 13% through 2025, landing at a CET1 ratio of 13.5% after deducting the buyback in the second quarter. 

    As always, our success was not possible without our team members across BAWAG Group who work tirelessly on behalf of our customers, shareholders, and the communities we serve. Their dedication, passion, and relentless pursuit of excellence set us apart. I’m incredibly proud of what we’ve achieved together – and even more excited about what lies ahead.”           

    The earnings presentation is available on https://www.bawaggroup.com.

    Delivering strong H1 2025 results as a larger group

    in € million Q2 ’25 Change vs prior year (in %) H1’25 Change vs prior year (in %)
    Core revenues 547.9 40 1,082.7 38
    Net interest income 457.6 45 903.4 43
    Net commission income 90.3 19 179.3 18
    Operating income 551.9 41 1,085.7 40
    Operating expenses (206.7) 62 (404.3) 59
    Pre-provision profit 345.2 31 681.4 31
    Regulatory charges (10.4) >100 (20.0) >100
    Risk costs (52.0) 86 (111.2) 92
    Profit before tax 283.9 22 551.9 21
    Net profit 210.2 20 411.2 20
             
    RoTCE 27.6% 3.3pts 26.7% 2.7pts
    CIR 37.5% 4.9pts 37.2% 4.4pts
    Earnings per share (€) 2.65 20% 5.19 20%
    Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR) 237% 17pts 237% 17pts

    Earnings presentation
    BAWAG Group will host the earnings call with our CEO Anas Abuzaakouk and CFO Enver Siručić at 10 a.m. CEST on 23 July 2025. The webcast details are available on our website under Financial Results | BAWAG Group.

    About BAWAG Group
    BAWAG Group AG is a publicly listed holding company headquartered in Vienna, Austria, serving our over 4 million retail, small business, corporate, real estate and public sector customers across Austria, Germany, Switzerland, Netherlands, Ireland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. The Group operates under various brands and across multiple channels offering comprehensive savings, payment, lending, leasing, investment, building society, factoring and insurance products and services. Our goal is to deliver simple, transparent, and affordable financial products and services that our customers need.

    BAWAG Group’s Investor Relations website https://www.bawaggroup.com/ir contains further information, including financial and other information for investors.

    Forward-looking statement
    This release contains “forward-looking statements” regarding the financial condition, results of operations, business plans and future performance of BAWAG Group. Words such as “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “expects,” “forecasts,” “intends,” “plans,” “projects,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “would,” “could” and other similar expressions are intended to identify these forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements reflect management’s expectations as of the date hereof and are subject to risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially from those projected. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, economic conditions, the regulatory environment, loan concentrations, vendors, employees, technology, competition, and interest rates. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the forward-looking statements as actual results may differ materially from the results predicted. Neither BAWAG Group nor any of its affiliates, advisors or representatives shall have any liability whatsoever (in negligence or otherwise) for any loss howsoever arising from any use of this report or its content or otherwise arising in connection with this document. This report does not constitute an offer or invitation to purchase or subscribe for any securities and neither it nor any part of it shall form the basis of or be relied upon in connection with any contract or commitment whatsoever. This statement is included for the express purpose of invoking “safe harbor provisions”.

    Financial Community:
    Jutta Wimmer (Head of Investor Relations)
    Tel: +43 (0) 5 99 05-22474

    IR Hotline: +43 (0) 5 99 05-34444
    E-mail: investor.relations@bawaggroup.com

    Media:
    Manfred Rapolter (Head of Corporate Communications & Social Engagement)
    Tel: +43 (0) 5 99 05-31210
    E-mail: communications@bawaggroup.com

    This text can also be downloaded from our website: https://www.bawaggroup.com

    The MIL Network

  • Trump pulls US out of UN cultural agency UNESCO for second time

    Source: Government of India

    Source: Government of India (4)

    President Donald Trump has decided to pull the United States out of the “woke” and “divisive” U.N. culture and education agency UNESCO, the White House said on Tuesday, repeating a move he took in his first term that was reversed by Joe Biden.

    The withdrawal from the Paris-based agency, which was founded after World War Two to promote peace through international cooperation in education, science, and culture, will take effect at the end of next year.

    The move is in line with the Trump administration’s broader “America-first” foreign policy, which includes a deep skepticism of multilateral groups, including the United Nations, the World Trade Organization, and the NATO alliance.

    White House spokeswoman Anna Kelly said UNESCO “supports woke, divisive cultural and social causes that are totally out-of-step with the commonsense policies that Americans voted for.”

    The State Department accused UNESCO of supporting “a globalist, ideological agenda for international development at odds with our America First foreign policy”.

    It said its decision to admit the Palestinians as a member state was “highly problematic, contrary to U.S. policy, and contributed to the proliferation of anti-Israel rhetoric.”

    UNESCO chief Audrey Azoulay said she deeply regretted Trump’s decision, but it was “expected, and UNESCO has prepared for it.”

    Posting on X, French President Emmanuel Macron professed “unwavering support” for the “universal protector” of world heritage and said the U.S. move would not weaken France’s commitment to UNESCO.

    UNESCO officials said the U.S. withdrawal would have some limited impact on U.S.-financed programs.

    Azoulay said UNESCO had diversified funding sources, receiving only about 8% of its budget from Washington.

    UNESCO was one of several international bodies Trump withdrew from during his first term, along with the World Health Organization, the Paris Agreement climate change accord, and the U.N. Human Rights Council. During his second term, he has largely reinstated those steps.

    Trump’s pick to be his U.N. envoy, Mike Waltz, said this month the United Nations needs reform while expressing confidence that “we can make the U.N. great again.”

    ISRAEL PRAISES US ‘MORAL SUPPORT AND LEADERSHIP’

    Israel welcomed the U.S. decision with its U.N. ambassador, Danny Danon, accusing UNESCO of “consistent misguided anti-Israel bias.”

    In a post on X, Israel’s Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar, thanked Washington for its “moral support and leadership” and said that “Singling out Israel and politicization by member states must end, in this and all professional UN agencies.”

    U.S. Senator Jeanne Shaheen, the senior Democrat on the Republican-controlled Senate Foreign Relations Committee, called Trump’s decision “short-sighted and a win for China,” which she said became the largest financial contributor to UNESCO after Trump last withdrew from the agency.

    UNESCO officials said all relevant agency statements had been agreed with both Israel and the Palestinians over the past eight years.

    Azoulay said the U.S. had given the same reasons for its pullout as it had seven years ago “even though the situation has changed profoundly, political tensions have receded, and UNESCO today constitutes a rare forum for consensus on concrete and action-oriented multilateralism.”

    “These claims also contradict the reality of UNESCO’s efforts, particularly in the field of Holocaust education and the fight against antisemitism,” she added.

    The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization is best known for designating World Heritage Sites, including the U.S. Grand Canyon and Egypt’s pyramids.

    It lists 26 sites in the United States, including the Statue of Liberty, on its World Heritage List which highlights 1,248 global locations of “outstanding universal value.”

    Washington has had a troubled relationship with UNESCO over the years.

    It was a founding member in 1945 but first withdrew in 1984 to protest alleged financial mismanagement and perceived anti-U.S. bias during the Cold War.

    It returned in 2003 under President George W. Bush, who said UNESCO had undertaken needed reforms, but in 2011 the Obama administration announced it was stopping funding for the agency following its vote to grant the Palestinians full membership.

    Trump’s first administration announced in 2017 it was quitting after accusing UNESCO of anti-Israeli bias, with Washington owing $542 million in dues, before former President Biden reversed the decision in 2023.

    (Reuters)

  • MIL-OSI Russia: Vorontsovo Estate. From Boyar Estates to the Summer in Moscow Project

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: Moscow Government – Government of Moscow –

    An important disclaimer is at the bottom of this article.

    French fashion, military triumphs and one very ambitious but never realized project with an airship – all this is about the Vorontsovo estate. Art historian Veronika Teletskaya tells about its history and modernity – from curiosities to grandeur and a renovated space with a lecture hall and a library in the open air.

    Boyar Voronets and the Wasteland of the Time of Troubles

    “Our estate dates back to the 14th century, its first owner was the boyar Fyodor Voronets,” says Veronika Teletskaya. “He owned the estate for some time, but then it was most likely taken away from him for some sins that we don’t know about.”

    So the estate has nothing to do with the famous Vorontsov counts. After the boyar Voronts the area went to the treasury, there were royal hunting grounds and places for rest, and in the Time of Troubles – a wasteland (not bare fields, but simply the absence of inhabitants).

    Repniny: French chic and birch avenue

    Everything changed in the 17th century, when Vorontsovo fell into the hands of the Repnin family, a military dynasty for whom the estate became the embodiment of ambition and fashion. The Repnins considered it their family home. “During their reign, Gothic gates, the Trinity Church, greenhouses, outbuildings, and the Vorontsov ponds appeared,” lists Veronika Teletskaya.

    The main pond, by the way, was natural — fed by the Kotlovka and Ramenka rivers, but it caused the owners a lot of trouble. “Spills and rising waters flooded the estate. There was no asphalt — just mud,” the art historian explains. The issue had to be resolved — and so a cascade of four ponds appeared, which still exists today. Beautiful and practical — the water could now drain lower in level, and the flooding stopped.

    The head of the family, Field Marshal General Nikolai Vasilyevich Repnin, decided to build… a birch avenue. “An estate tree is usually an oak and a linden, right? But Nikolai Vasilyevich did it differently,” says Veronika Teletskaya. “When an estate is built, the landowner is a king and a god. He wanted birches, and he planted birches.” True, they did not survive to this day, but 250-year-old oaks in the oak grove have survived – they were there when Nikolai Vasilyevich lived. The birch avenue became the main alley, but two more lead from the central entrance to the estate, forming a trident together. This is a reference to the French Versailles and the trident of Neptune – a symbol of power. Everything in the family nest was supposed to remind of the military exploits of the family. Alexander Pushkin wrote about the military distinctions of the Repnins in the poem “Poltava”:

    These are the chicks of Peter’s nest – In the changes of earthly destiny, In the labors of state and war His comrades, sons: And the noble Sheremetev, And Bruce, and Bour, and Repnin…

    These lines are about Nikolai Vasilyevich’s grandfather, General Anikita Repnin.

    Gothic Gate and Forgotten Bridge

    The ceremonial, or Gothic, gates are the calling card of the Vorontsovo estate. In the 18th century, they produced an incredible effect (and the owner clearly intended them to be so). The gates were built in honor of Nikolai Vasilyevich’s military victories in the Turkish wars. The gate turrets, on the one hand, refer to the Gothic style, and on the other, they resemble the Turkish bastions that were conquered by the Field Marshal. “They stood on the road from Moscow to Kaluga and Tula – and imagine what an impression they made on travelers!” says Veronika Teletskaya. The Humpbacked Bridge from the 1790s led to the gates; it was accidentally discovered by archaeologists in 2005. “Everyone forgot about it – it was lying under a layer of earth,” notes the art historian.

    Airship with a gilded boat

    A very charming (and slightly strange) page in the life of the Vorontsovo estate is the story of the construction of an airship. At the beginning of the 19th century, the estate became a testing ground for the construction of the first airship bomber in Russia. The descendants of Nikolai Vasilyevich lived in St. Petersburg, and rented out the lands and buildings of the family nest.

    “There was an inventor named Franz Xavier Leppich,” says Veronika Teletskaya. “At first he proposed the idea to Napoleon, but the latter had already heard about his developments, did not appreciate them, and ordered Leppich to be expelled from France. Leppich did not lose his head – he came to the Russians, convinced Alexander I. They began to build.”

    The idea was grandiose: a gilded boat lifted by a balloon, with a crew of forty people. “They spent a lot of money, but the “miracle of technology” did not take off. It did not even lift four people,” says the art historian.

    During Napoleon’s troops’ stay in Moscow, the main house of the estate was badly damaged, and the owners decided to dismantle it.

    A kitchen outbuilding with 18th-century fire-fighting technology and the unexpected hobby of noble men

    Several interesting buildings have survived to this day. The western (kitchen) wing has a preserved barrel vault. “This is a specially shaped ceiling with an iron covering: if there was a fire in the kitchen, the fire would not spread to the second floor or neighboring buildings,” explains Veronika Teletskaya. No less curious are the Finnish tiled stoves. To heat the house, you had to first heat the basement, then the first floor, and only then the second.

    As for the hobbies of aristocrats, it was not only balls and hunting – in the second half of the 18th century, Russian nobles (primarily, paradoxically, men) were keen on gardening. “Men grew exotic fruits – imagine having your own melon or strawberry out of season!” – says Veronika Teletskaya. Moreover, they exchanged seeds in letters. “There were even such complaints: I sent you seeds, but you didn’t send me!” – the art critic continues.

    The tradition of serving fresh fruit at any time of year, which amazed foreigners, originated from such estate experiments. The Vorontsov greenhouse with its steam heating system (warm air rose from the cellar) and glass roof (a rare luxury for that time) reflected this fashionable hobby. The glass roof has not survived, but the building itself, which adorns the park, is currently being restored.

    After the Repnins, the estate survived a series of owners and the dacha boom of the late 19th century. There was even a women’s prison here, where the revolutionary Maria Spiridonova was “re-educated.” And during the Great Patriotic War, barrage balloons were launched from here, which protected Moscow from air raids – as if the estate had justified the failure of the airship.

    Karaoke with a piano and a library in the forest

    Now the estate is experiencing a boom again. “City festivals and events for visitors of all ages, from children to the older generation, take place here,” says Maria Pashkova, the cultural and leisure manager of the Vorontsovo estate.

    This summer, Vorontsovo became one of the sites of the festival “Moscow Estates”. On weekends, you can take part in noble games, picnics, promenades (the schedule is on the project’s website “Summer in Moscow”).

    The dance floor and forest library are especially popular. The first, designed as a place for yoga and dancing, becomes a recreation area and a place for photo shoots in free time. The second is a space for unusual entertainment – for example, karaoke with a piano or master classes on creating boutonnieres.

    For those who prefer active leisure, Vorontsovo offers a site with exercise machines for all muscle groups, a multifunctional sports area (skating rink in winter, volleyball and table tennis in summer), Nordic walking and dancing classes, as well as programs for participants project “Moscow Longevity”.

    “Moscow Longevity has a lot of activities, some of the top ones are dancing, Nordic walking, general physical training. Sometimes we organize separate concerts and excursions for the program participants,” adds Maria Pashkova.

    Vorontsov hosts themed excursions, among the most popular are: “One day in the life of a landowner”, hosted by Veronika Teletskaya.

    The surviving buildings of the estate are bustling with life. The western (kitchen) wing attracts visitors with temporary exhibitions. Until July 31, the exhibition “Girl. Young Lady. Lady” is open here, where dresses, fans and other attributes of women’s life of the 19th century are presented. The most touching exhibits are dolls, doll dishes and accessories. Little young ladies arranged tea parties and visits for their dolls, at the same time learning how to properly set the table and mastering the rules of etiquette. In the eastern wing (the stable yard servants’ quarters), various thematic classes are held – from English to drawing, and the southern service building is used for master classes and lectures. Now a children’s theme camp is open there – it is dedicated to animation. There is also a lecture hall in the park. The schedule of classes, lectures, master classes and exhibitions can be found atofficial website of the estate and on her page in the service “Mosbilet”.

    Today, the Vorontsovo estate and Vorontsov Park are a place where history lives in beautiful architecture, interesting exhibitions, open-air dancing and quiet walks under centuries-old oaks.

    Get the latest news quicklyofficial telegram channel the city of Moscow.

    Please note: This information is raw content obtained directly from the source of the information. It is an accurate report of what the source claims and does not necessarily reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    .

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI China: Inbound tourism in Shanghai heats up in summer travel surge

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    Inbound tourism in Shanghai heats up in summer travel surge

    Xinhua | July 23, 2025

    Tourists Alfredo Cimmino (L) and Giulio Bartoli from Italy take a selfie with Shanghai Oriental Pearl Tower at the Bund area in Shanghai, east China, July 18, 2025. Thanks to China’s visa-free policies and related measures, the popularity of both travel and shopping in China among foreigners has risen, serving as a boost to the country’s tourism development.

    Foreign nationals made a total of 38.05 million trips to or from China in the first six months of the year, which was an increase of 30.2 percent year on year, the National Immigration Administration (NIA) said on July 16.

    Of these trips, 13.64 million were visa-free entries, an increase of 53.9 percent from the same period last year, the NIA said.

    Shanghai has seen a surge in inbound tourism in summer travel season this year since July 1. The city recorded 187 thousands inbound tourist trips during July 1 to July 15, a 35.5 percent increase from the previous year. Among them, 92 thousands visits were visa-free entries, accounting for nearly 50 percent of the total number of inbound foreign travelers. (Xinhua/Chen Haoming)

    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   >  

    MIL OSI China News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Rep. Doggett Appointed to U.S. Helsinki Commission

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Lloyd Doggett (D-TX)

    Contact: Alexis Torres  

    Washington, D.C.—U.S. Representative Lloyd Doggett (D-Texas) announced his appointment to serve on the Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe, also known as the Helsinki Commission. Created in 1976, this independent U.S. Government agency monitors compliance and advancement of human rights, democracy, economic, environmental, and military cooperation in the 57-nation Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) region.

    “I am pleased to represent Austin, a vibrant international community, in an international organization founded upon the defense of human rights and fundamental freedoms. With an authoritarian president at home and so many troubling conflicts abroad, the Helsinki Commission offers me another forum for engaging with its mission of democracy promotion, international cooperation, and peaceful conflict resolution,” said Rep. Doggett.  “As some urge ‘go-it-alone’ and others promote isolationism, I believe our security can be assured only through collaboration with our allies and strong diplomacy with our adversaries.” 

    Throughout his career, Rep. Doggett has been a strong champion for the rule of law, international human rights, and peace. Previously, he led whip efforts against President George W. Bush’s disastrous invasion of Iraq, warning of the consequences of what would become the worst foreign policy decision in American history. He was a leader in House efforts to protect the Iran nuclear agreement, formally known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), which was successfully negotiated during the Obama administration, but later rejected by President Trump. His name is also on the first sanctions legislation against Russia following its invasion of Ukraine. The Congressman was also a frequent participant in previous Helsinki Commission events, such as its Parliamentary Assembly and an investigation of Russian war crimes conducted in the same historic Nuremberg, Germany courtroom in which Nazi war criminals were once convicted.

    Congress originally created the Helsinki Commission in response to dissidents in the Soviet Union and its Eastern European allies, who saw the Helsinki Final Act as a new opportunity to hold governments accountable for their human rights records. The end of the Cold War allowed the Commission to expand its commitment to new areas, such as free and fair elections, energy security and the environment, and combating corruption and terrorism. The Commission is currently chaired by Senator Roger Wicker (R-MS), Chair of the Senate Armed Services Committee. It also consists of members from the United States Senate and U.S. House of Representatives, as well as the Departments of State, Defense, and Commerce.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-Evening Report: ER Report: A Roundup of Significant Articles on EveningReport.nz for July 23, 2025

    ER Report: Here is a summary of significant articles published on EveningReport.nz on July 23, 2025.

    Hard labour conditions of online moderators directly affect how well the internet is policed – new study
    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Tania Chatterjee, Joint PhD Candidate at Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi, The University of Queensland Getty Images/GCShutter Big tech platforms often present content moderation as a seamless, tech‑driven system. But human labour, often outsourced to countries such as India and the Philippines, plays a pivotal role in

    Ghosted by a friend? 4 expert tips on how to handle the hurt
    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Megan Willis, Associate Professor, School of Behavioural and Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University martin-dm/Getty When we talk about “ghosting”, we usually think it relates to dating. But what happens when you’ve been ghosted by someone you’ve known for years – your childhood best friend, a parent, a

    Labor’s new bill would cut HELP loans by 20%. But it also risks locking some graduates into a ‘debt treadmill’
    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Andrew Norton, Professor of Higher Education Policy, Monash University The Albanese government’s 20% cut to student debt is the first bill introduced to the new federal parliament. It is clever politics. In the government’s first term, the 3 million Australians with a student debt turned high indexation

    ICJ climate crisis ruling: Will world’s top court back Pacific-led call to hold governments accountable?
    By Jamie Tahana in The Hague for RNZ Pacific In 2019, a group of law students at the University of the South Pacific, frustrated at the slow pace with which the world’s governments were moving to address the climate crisis, had an idea — they would take the world’s governments to court. They arranged a

    ‘Maybe this is the last minutes you are living’: how the war is impacting young Ukrainians
    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Ashley Humphrey, Lecturer in Social Sciences, Monash University Now into its fourth year, the war that followed Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has taken a devastating toll. An estimated 60,000 to 100,0000 Ukrainian lives have been lost and more than 10 million citizens displaced, and entire cities have

    Auckland is NZ’s ‘primate city’ but its potential remains caged in by poor planning and vision
    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Timothy Welch, Senior Lecturer in Urban Planning, University of Auckland, Waipapa Taumata Rau Getty Images The recent report comparing Auckland to nine international peer cities delivered an uncomfortable truth: our largest city is falling behind, hampered by car dependency, low-density housing and “weak economic performance”. The Deloitte

    Climate disasters are pushing people into homelessness – but there’s a lot we can do about it
    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Timothy Heffernan, Lecturer in Anthropology, Australian National University Almost half of all Australian properties are at risk of bushfire, while 17,500 face risk of coastal erosion. By 2030, more than 3 million will face riverine flood risk. Meanwhile, housing demand continues to outpace supply. With climate-related disasters

    UK bans Gaza protest group – could the same thing happen in Australia?
    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Shannon Bosch, Associate Professor (Law), Edith Cowan University More than 100 people were arrested in the United Kingdom on the weekend for supporting Palestine Action, a protest group that opposes Britain’s support of Israel. Palestine Action was recently proscribed as a terrorist organisation, placing it in the

    The incredible impact of Ozzy Osbourne, from Black Sabbath to Ozzfest to 30 years of retirement tours
    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Lachlan Goold, Senior Lecturer in Contemporary Music, University of the Sunshine Coast Ozzy Osbourne photographed in London in 1991. Martyn Goodacre/Getty Images Ozzy Osbourne, the “prince of darkness” and godfather of heavy metal, has died aged 76, just weeks after he reunited with Black Sabbath bandmates for

    Could the latest ‘interstellar comet’ be an alien probe? Why spotting cosmic visitors is harder than you think
    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Sara Webb, Lecturer, Centre for Astrophysics and Supercomputing, Swinburne University of Technology Comet 3I/ATLAS International Gemini Observatory/NOIRLab/NSF/AURA/K. Meech/Jen Miller/Mahdi Zamani, CC BY On July 1, astronomers spotted an unusual high-speed object zooming towards the Sun. Dubbed 3I/ATLAS, the surprising space traveller had one very special quality: its

    Should Australia lower the voting age to 16 like the UK? We asked 5 experts
    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Pandanus Petter, Postdoctoral Research Fellow, School of Politics and International Relations, Australian National University The government in the UK is introducing legislation into parliament to lower the voting age to 16. If passed, the new age rules will be in place for the next general election, expected

    Doctors shouldn’t be allowed to object to medical care if it harms their patients
    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Julian Savulescu, Visiting Professor in Biomedical Ethics, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute; Distinguished Visiting Professor in Law, University of Melbourne; Uehiro Chair in Practical Ethics, The University of Melbourne HRAUN/Getty A young woman needs an abortion and the reasons, while urgent, are not medical. A United States Navy

    Ultra fast fashion could be taxed to oblivion in France. Could Australia follow suit?
    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Rowena Maguire, Professor of Law and Director of the Centre of Justice, Queensland University of Technology Ryan McVay/Getty For centuries, clothes were hard to produce and expensive. People wore them as long as possible. But manufacturing advances have steadily driven down the cost of production. These days,

    Central bank independence and credibility matters. Here’s why
    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By John Simon, Adjunct Fellow in Economics, Macquarie University Olga Kashubin/Shutterstock In the United States, President Donald Trump has been pressuring the chairman of the US Federal Reserve, Jerome Powell, to slash interest rates. This is partly to ease the interest payments on the ballooning US government debt.

    Kneecap’s stance on Gaza extends a long history of the Irish supporting other oppressed peoples
    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Ciara Smart, PhD Graduand in Australasian Irish History, University of Tasmania Love them or hate them, there’s no doubt Irish hip-hop trio Kneecap are having a moment. Their music – delivered in a powerful fusion of English and Irish – is known for its gritty lyrics about

    Do countries have a duty to prevent climate harm? The world’s highest court is about to answer this crucial question
    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Nathan Cooper, Associate Professor of Law, University of Waikato Getty Images The International Court of Justice (ICJ) will issue a highly anticipated advisory opinion overnight to clarify state obligations related to climate change. It will answer two urgent questions: what are the obligations of states under international

    Gaza not a religious issue – it’s a massive violation of international law, say accord critics
    Asia Pacific Report Groups that have declined to join the government-sponsored “harmony accord” signed yesterday by some Muslim and Jewish groups, say that the proposed new council is “misaligned” with its aims. The signed accord was presented at Government House in Auckland. About 70 people attended, including representatives of the New Zealand Jewish Council, His

    Flying the flags for Palestine – NZ protesters take message to Devonport
    The Devonport Flagstaff About 200 people marched in Devonport last Saturday in support of Palestine. Pro-Palestine flags and placards were draped on the band rotunda at Windsor Reserve as speakers, including Green Party co-leader Chlöe Swarbrick and the people power manager of Amnesty International Aotearoa New Zealand Margaret Taylor, a Devonport local, encouraged the crowd

    View from The Hill: How much can Jim Chalmers get out of the economic reform roundtable?
    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Michelle Grattan, Professorial Fellow, University of Canberra We’re now less than a month away from the start of the Albanese government’s “economic reform” (aka “productivity”) roundtable, but it has become quite hard to get a fix on exactly what this gathering will amount to. The guest list

    Israeli settlers beat to death 2 Palestinians in latest lynchings
    BEARING WITNESS: By Cole Martin in occupied West Bank Two young Palestinians were beaten to death on their land by Israeli settlers in the occupied West Bank on Friday. A funeral was held on Sunday for Sayfollah “Saif” Mussalet, 20, and Muhammad Shalabi, 23, who were brutally killed by a large group of settlers in

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-OSI China: Innovation, solid supply chain attracting FDI

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    This aerial photo taken on July 5, 2023 shows the Tianjin factory of Danfoss, a global refrigeration industry giant, in north China’s Tianjin. [Photo/Xinhua]

    China will remain a vital innovation hub and manufacturing base for foreign corporations despite global economic uncertainty, said government officials and business leaders.

    They noted that foreign firms are maintaining deep engagement with the Chinese market, capitalizing on their technological expertise alongside China’s well-developed industrial and supply chains — a synergy that enhances operational efficiency, fosters innovation and strengthens supply chain resilience.

    Foreign-invested companies in China saw their export and import value grow by 2.4 percent year-on-year to 6.32 trillion yuan ($881.2 billion) in the first half, marking growth for the fifth consecutive quarter, statistics from the General Administration of Customs showed.

    The number of foreign-invested businesses in the country with actual import and export activities amounted to 75,000 in the first six months, the highest level for the same period since 2021, said the administration.

    China’s evolving industrial ecosystem — combining cost, quality and speed with advanced infrastructure — is transforming into a collaborative innovation hub where multinationals co-develop and expand alongside local partners, said Mohamed Kande, global chairman of PricewaterhouseCoopers International Ltd, a London-based global accounting company.

    Reflecting on this shift, Lyu Daliang, director of the GAC’s department of statistics and analysis, said that among the major manufacturing categories involved in foreign company exports, industries such as specialized equipment, electrical machinery and electronic devices all posted robust growth between January and June.

    One such company — Global Electric Appliance (Nantong) Co Ltd, a manufacturer of household appliances in Nantong, Jiangsu province and a subsidiary of a Singapore-based industrial group — reported a 31.9 percent year-on-year increase in exports, reaching 343 million yuan in the first half, said Nanjing Customs.

    Chen Jinxin, head of the company’s foreign trade unit, said the company has shipped its products, including vacuum and steam cleaners, to over 90 overseas markets, backed by China’s innovative solutions and a highly integrated supply chain that enables rapid product development and efficient global distribution.

    Apart from investing 3 billion yuan in its Hangzhou plant in Zhejiang province over the past decade, Italian chocolate and confectionery maker Ferrero Group said that the factory now supplies 53 percent of its products to the Chinese market, with the remaining 47 percent exported to more than 20 countries and regions across the Asia-Pacific, the Middle East and North America.

    Yang Lianjun, general manager of Ferrero’s Hangzhou plant, said the Chinese market offers significant opportunities, and the company may introduce additional premium product categories in the future, such as ice cream.

    To bolster its local research and development capabilities, Ferrero established a food innovation center within its Hangzhou facility last year. The center focuses on developing chocolate, confectionery and bakery products tailored to regional preferences and shortening time-to-market cycles.

    The Ministry of Commerce said foreign direct investment in China’s manufacturing sector reached 109.06 billion yuan in the first half, while high-tech industries attracted 127.87 billion yuan. FDI inflows from Switzerland, Japan, the United Kingdom and Germany rose by 68.6 percent, 59.1 percent, 37.6 percent and 6.3 percent, respectively.

    Amid a turbulent and uncertain global trade landscape, the stability of China’s policy environment and the long-term orientation of its planning have grown increasingly valuable, said Li Xingqian, vice-chairman of the China Council for the Promotion of International Trade.

    Neutrik Technology (Ningbo) Co Ltd, a Ningbo, Zhejiang province-based manufacturer of electronic connectors and a subsidiary of the European company Neutrik AG, reported a 19 percent year-on-year rise in first-half sales to 68.45 million yuan, covering both domestic sales and exports, said Ningbo Customs.

    Dong Lanju, the company’s president, said that China’s well-integrated industrial ecosystem and pro-business environment will continue to empower foreign manufacturers to expand production, boost operational efficiency and better capture opportunities in global markets.

    MIL OSI China News

  • MIL-OSI China: China claim team gold in artistic swimming at World Aquatics Championships

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    Wearing golden headbands symbolizing the legendary Monkey King, China’s artistic swimmers brought the myth to life in a powerful Wukong-inspired routine to win gold in the team technical event at the 2025 World Aquatics Championships on Tuesday.

    Their performance, based on the popular Chinese video game Black Myth: Wukong, earned China 307.8001 points – edging out longtime rivals Russia, competing under the name Neutral Athletes B (NAB), who finished second with 300.6183 points. Spain took third with 294.8575.

    Team China perform during the team technical final of artistic swimming at the World Aquatics Championships in Singapore, July 22, 2025. (Photo by Then Chih Wey/Xinhua)

    “This is a very special day,” said head coach Zhang Xiaohuan. “It’s the first time the Chinese artistic swimming team has been able to directly compete against our biggest rivals on a stage like this. It’s a moment we’ve waited a long time for.”

    “This gold medal doesn’t feel any less important than the one we won at the Olympic Games in Paris,” she added. “Our swimmers performed very well today. They improved on the areas that needed work after the preliminary round, and with that, they earned this title.”

    China won both the duet and team titles at the 2024 Paris Games, where Russian athletes did not participate.

    “I think they are still a very admirable opponent,” Zhang said. “They give us strong motivation to keep improving. We only narrowly won this time. We still have a long way to go.”

    Defeating NAB also gave the Chinese team a significant confidence boost.

    “We’ve waited a long time to compete against a team we’ve always wanted to measure ourselves against,” said team captain Feng Yu. “That makes this result even more special. It’s only when you face tough competition that you learn and improve.”

    The Wukong routine has been successful since its debut at the Artistic Swimming World Cup Super Final in Xi’an this June, where China also delivered a dominant performance. The coaching staff increased the difficulty level for the World Championships.

    “We raised the difficulty by almost two points,” Zhang said. “Most of that came from the leg movements. However, we didn’t extend the athletes’ breath-holding time. Instead, we incorporated more challenging movements at a faster tempo.”

    The runners-up were pleased with their silver medal.

    “We are very happy to be here at such a high-level competition,” said Anastasiia Bakhtyreva of NAB. “This is our first time competing at this level, and we feel a tremendous amount of emotion. We are very excited.”

    Earlier in the day, China’s Xu Huiyan won silver in the women’s solo free event, finishing behind Spain’s Iris Tio Casas. Just hours later, she returned to the pool for the team technical final.

    Xu made history in Singapore by winning China’s first-ever women’s solo technical gold medal at the World Championships. The 19-year-old now holds 19 gold medals across the World Cup, World Championships and World Junior Championships.

    “As a young athlete, Huiyan has progressed remarkably in just one year – from winning bronze in Doha to achieving what she has here in Singapore,” said Zhang. “Our rival in the solo free delivered an outstanding routine today.”

    The team technical gold marks China’s third gold in artistic swimming at the 2025 World Championships. 

    MIL OSI China News

  • MIL-OSI China: Tears of triumph and disappointment: Casas wins solo free gold, Xu falls short

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    Tears flowed for both Spain’s Iris Tio Casas and China’s Xu Huiyan after the women’s solo free final at the World Aquatics Championships on Tuesday – but for very different reasons.

    Casas stood atop the podium with tears of joy after clinching her first individual world title in artistic swimming with a score of 245.1913 points. Xu, who had led the preliminary round, settled for silver, 4.1888 points behind Casas, and she couldn’t hold back tears of disappointment.

    Xu Huiyan of China reacts during awarding ceremony for the women’s solo free of artistic swimming at the World Aquatics Championships in Singapore, July 22, 2025. (Xinhua/Luo Yuan)

    “I’m super happy,” Casas said. “I can’t believe it right now. I feel very emotional because my parents are here in the stands. When I was little, the dream of becoming a world champion was deep in my soul. I’m still in shock.”

    The 22-year-old Spaniard improved her degree of difficulty in the final, responding to Xu’s similar strategy. Entering the final ranked third, Casas executed with precision and passion to rise to the top – an achievement that left her surrounded by jubilant teammates after the result was announced.

    “I think it worked out,” she said, smiling through tears.

    Xu, just 19, had hoped to complete a golden solo double after winning the technical event three days earlier, where Casas took bronze. But after her final routine, Xu buried her face in hands, tears streaming down – not from regret, she said, but from emotion.

    “I’m not sad about the result,” she said. “Actually, I’ve improved a lot in the past few weeks. I just feel like I still have so much more to work on.”

    Despite the silver, Xu has already made history for China. She now holds 18 gold medals across the World Cup, World Championships and World Junior Championships. Her solo technical win in Singapore earned China its first-ever world gold in that discipline.

    “I anticipated today’s result,” she admitted. “Ever since I started competing in the solo free routine, I’ve known there are still areas I need to improve – especially in the free elements. We didn’t have much time to make big changes, and training time for solo routines was quite limited.”

    Xu isn’t dwelling on the disappointment for long. Just hours after the solo free final, she will be back for the team technical final. She has already led China to the team free title.

    “That’s not a problem,” she said. “I’ll do my best and won’t let my teammates down.”

    MIL OSI China News

  • MIL-OSI China: Leeds sign midfielder Anton Stach from Hoffenheim

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    German international midfielder Anton Stach has joined newly promoted Leeds United from Hoffenheim in a deal worth around 17.5 million pounds (23.5 million U.S. dollars).

    Jeong Wooyeong (R) of VfB Stuttgart vies with Anton Stach of TSG 1899 Hoffenheim during the first division of Bundesliga 9th round match between VfB Stuttgart and TSG 1899 Hoffenheim, in Stuttgart, Germany, Oct. 28, 2023. (Photo by Ulrich Hufnagel/Xinhua)

    Stach has signed a four-year contract and becomes Leeds’ sixth signing of the summer as the club aims to re-establish itself in the Premier League.

    The 26-year-old has played twice for the German national side and was a regular for Hoffenheim last season.

    “I am excited to join such a good team, such a good Premier League team, and I am looking forward to the next season,” said Stach in an interview on the club’s website, in which he was honest about Leeds’ aims for the coming season.

    “The biggest target is to stay in the league and personally just develop, adapt to the league, to the speed of course and then get many good experiences hopefully,” he added.

    “My style of play, I would say I am an aggressive player. I am good in duels. I am good at anticipating passes from the opponents and it would be good for the Premier League. Now we will see, I will try my best,” continued the midfielder. 

    MIL OSI China News

  • MIL-OSI China: Spain to host Ryder Cup for second time in 2031

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    The Ryder Cup golf tournament which pits Europe against the United States every two years, will return to Spain in 2031, the organizers announced on Tuesday.

    A post from the Ryder Cup on social media said the competition will be held at Camiral Golf and Wellness, which is close to the city of Girona.

    Spain hosted the Ryder Cup at Valderrama in Andalusia in 1997, with Europe emerging victorious under Seve Ballesteros as captain.

    “As well as being one of the most prestigious competitions in the sporting calendar, the Ryder is an exceptional platform to show the capacity Spain has to host important events,” said Jose Manuel Rodriguez Uribes, president of Spain’s sports council.

    MIL OSI China News

  • MIL-OSI Submissions: Doctors shouldn’t be allowed to object to medical care if it harms their patients

    Source: The Conversation – Global Perspectives – By Julian Savulescu, Visiting Professor in Biomedical Ethics, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute; Distinguished Visiting Professor in Law, University of Melbourne; Uehiro Chair in Practical Ethics, The University of Melbourne

    HRAUN/Getty

    A young woman needs an abortion and the reasons, while urgent, are not medical. A United States Navy nurse at Guantánamo Bay is ordered to force-feed a defiant detainee on hunger strike.

    These very different real-life cases have one connecting thread: the question of whether a health professional can conscientiously object to carrying out a patient’s request.

    Freedom of conscience is often held up as a purely noble principle. But when it’s used to deny health care, it means a single person’s beliefs are dictating what is best for another person’s physical and mental health – which can have devastating, even fatal, results.

    In our recent book, Rethinking Conscientious Objection in Healthcare, colleagues and I conclude doctors should not be free to make medical decisions based on their personal beliefs.

    It’s not noble to refuse care

    Freedom of conscience is strongly – but not absolutely – protected under international human rights law. It is enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

    This principle has often been used for moral purposes: for example, to resist orders to torture or kill.

    But after researching use of conscientious objection by health professionals, I have concluded it is seriously flawed when used to deny patients health services. This is especially so when particular doctors have a monopoly on service provision, as is the case with abortion and assisted dying in many rural and regional areas of Australia.

    In Australia, doctors are allowed to conscientiously object to abortion, although nearly all states require referral to other service providers or information about how to access the relevant service.

    In practice, these laws are not enforced and sometimes disregarded.

    A doctor’s refusal can mean patients can be denied the standard of care they need, or indeed, any care at all.

    Health-care professionals are not like pacifists refusing conscription into the military, opposing something forced upon them. They freely choose health-care careers that come with obligations and with ethical stances already established by professional codes of conduct.

    People are free to hold whatever beliefs they choose, but those beliefs will inevitably close off some options for them. For example, a vegetarian will not be able to work in an abattoir. That is true for every one of us. But what shouldn’t happen is a doctor’s personal beliefs closing off legitimate options for their patient.

    4 guiding questions

    Instead of personal values, there are four key secular principles we propose that doctors should rely on when deciding how to advise patients about sensitive procedures:

    • is it legal?

    • is it a just and fair use of any resources that might be limited?

    • is it in the interests of the patient’s wellbeing?

    • is it what the patient has themselves decided they want?

    Of course, there will be times when some of these principles are in conflict – that is when it is important to apply the most crucial ones, the wellbeing of the patient and the patient’s own wishes.

    In Ireland in 2012, a young woman named Savita Halappanavar went to an Irish hospital for treatment for her miscarriage. Doctors knew there was no hope of the pregnancy surviving but refused to evacuate her uterus while there was still a fetal heartbeat, for fear of breaching Ireland’s anti-abortion laws. The result: Savita died of septicaemia at 31.

    If doctors had put the patient’s wellbeing first, they would have given her that termination, despite the law, and it would have saved her life.

    These are the principles that should have been applied to the examples above: the woman seeking an abortion for career reasons or the nurse refusing to force-feed prisoners.

    The doctor (or nurse) should ask: Is it what the patient has autonomously decided they want? Will it lead to the best outcome for both their physical and their mental health?

    If abortion will promote a woman’s wellbeing, it is in her interests. Hunger strikers should not be force-fed because it violates their autonomy.

    An unfair burden

    While doctors’ personal values are important, they should not dictate care at the bedside. Not only can this disadvantage the patient, but it places an unfair burden on colleagues who do accept such work, and must carry a disproportionate load of procedures they might find unpleasant and financially unrewarding.

    It also creates injustice. Patients who are educated, wealthy and well-connected already find it easier to access health care. Conscientious objection intensifies that unfairness in large swathes of the country because it further limits options.

    Two countries with excellent health-care systems, Sweden and Finland, do not permit conscientious objection by medical professionals.

    In Australia, it is time we do the same and strongly limit conscientious objection as a legal right for health professionals. We should also ensure those entering the discipline are prepared to take on all procedures relevant to their specialty.

    And lastly, but most importantly, we should educate them that the patient’s interests and values must always come first. An individual doctor’s sense of moral authority should not be permitted to morph into medical and moral authoritarianism.

    Julian Savulescu does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. Doctors shouldn’t be allowed to object to medical care if it harms their patients – https://theconversation.com/doctors-shouldnt-be-allowed-to-object-to-medical-care-if-it-harms-their-patients-260003

    MIL OSI

  • MIL-OSI Submissions: Doctors shouldn’t be allowed to object to medical care if it harms their patients

    Source: The Conversation – Global Perspectives – By Julian Savulescu, Visiting Professor in Biomedical Ethics, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute; Distinguished Visiting Professor in Law, University of Melbourne; Uehiro Chair in Practical Ethics, The University of Melbourne

    HRAUN/Getty

    A young woman needs an abortion and the reasons, while urgent, are not medical. A United States Navy nurse at Guantánamo Bay is ordered to force-feed a defiant detainee on hunger strike.

    These very different real-life cases have one connecting thread: the question of whether a health professional can conscientiously object to carrying out a patient’s request.

    Freedom of conscience is often held up as a purely noble principle. But when it’s used to deny health care, it means a single person’s beliefs are dictating what is best for another person’s physical and mental health – which can have devastating, even fatal, results.

    In our recent book, Rethinking Conscientious Objection in Healthcare, colleagues and I conclude doctors should not be free to make medical decisions based on their personal beliefs.

    It’s not noble to refuse care

    Freedom of conscience is strongly – but not absolutely – protected under international human rights law. It is enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

    This principle has often been used for moral purposes: for example, to resist orders to torture or kill.

    But after researching use of conscientious objection by health professionals, I have concluded it is seriously flawed when used to deny patients health services. This is especially so when particular doctors have a monopoly on service provision, as is the case with abortion and assisted dying in many rural and regional areas of Australia.

    In Australia, doctors are allowed to conscientiously object to abortion, although nearly all states require referral to other service providers or information about how to access the relevant service.

    In practice, these laws are not enforced and sometimes disregarded.

    A doctor’s refusal can mean patients can be denied the standard of care they need, or indeed, any care at all.

    Health-care professionals are not like pacifists refusing conscription into the military, opposing something forced upon them. They freely choose health-care careers that come with obligations and with ethical stances already established by professional codes of conduct.

    People are free to hold whatever beliefs they choose, but those beliefs will inevitably close off some options for them. For example, a vegetarian will not be able to work in an abattoir. That is true for every one of us. But what shouldn’t happen is a doctor’s personal beliefs closing off legitimate options for their patient.

    4 guiding questions

    Instead of personal values, there are four key secular principles we propose that doctors should rely on when deciding how to advise patients about sensitive procedures:

    • is it legal?

    • is it a just and fair use of any resources that might be limited?

    • is it in the interests of the patient’s wellbeing?

    • is it what the patient has themselves decided they want?

    Of course, there will be times when some of these principles are in conflict – that is when it is important to apply the most crucial ones, the wellbeing of the patient and the patient’s own wishes.

    In Ireland in 2012, a young woman named Savita Halappanavar went to an Irish hospital for treatment for her miscarriage. Doctors knew there was no hope of the pregnancy surviving but refused to evacuate her uterus while there was still a fetal heartbeat, for fear of breaching Ireland’s anti-abortion laws. The result: Savita died of septicaemia at 31.

    If doctors had put the patient’s wellbeing first, they would have given her that termination, despite the law, and it would have saved her life.

    These are the principles that should have been applied to the examples above: the woman seeking an abortion for career reasons or the nurse refusing to force-feed prisoners.

    The doctor (or nurse) should ask: Is it what the patient has autonomously decided they want? Will it lead to the best outcome for both their physical and their mental health?

    If abortion will promote a woman’s wellbeing, it is in her interests. Hunger strikers should not be force-fed because it violates their autonomy.

    An unfair burden

    While doctors’ personal values are important, they should not dictate care at the bedside. Not only can this disadvantage the patient, but it places an unfair burden on colleagues who do accept such work, and must carry a disproportionate load of procedures they might find unpleasant and financially unrewarding.

    It also creates injustice. Patients who are educated, wealthy and well-connected already find it easier to access health care. Conscientious objection intensifies that unfairness in large swathes of the country because it further limits options.

    Two countries with excellent health-care systems, Sweden and Finland, do not permit conscientious objection by medical professionals.

    In Australia, it is time we do the same and strongly limit conscientious objection as a legal right for health professionals. We should also ensure those entering the discipline are prepared to take on all procedures relevant to their specialty.

    And lastly, but most importantly, we should educate them that the patient’s interests and values must always come first. An individual doctor’s sense of moral authority should not be permitted to morph into medical and moral authoritarianism.

    Julian Savulescu does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. Doctors shouldn’t be allowed to object to medical care if it harms their patients – https://theconversation.com/doctors-shouldnt-be-allowed-to-object-to-medical-care-if-it-harms-their-patients-260003

    MIL OSI

  • MIL-OSI China: China’s large scientific facility attracts global scientists for cutting-edge research

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    China’s large scientific facility attracts global scientists for cutting-edge research

    BEIJING, July 22 — The Synergetic Extreme Condition User Facility (SECUF), a major scientific infrastructure in Beijing’s suburban district Huairou, has attracted scientists from multiple countries to conduct cutting-edge research with its exceptional experimental conditions.

    A recent conference based on SECUF was held in Huairou, bringing together over 50 foreign scientists from 13 countries and more than 100 Chinese scientists.

    SECUF, led and operated by the Institute of Physics (IOP) of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), is a comprehensive research infrastructure that integrates extreme experimental conditions such as ultralow temperatures, ultrahigh magnetic fields, ultrahigh pressures, and ultrafast optics.

    The facility has provided over 350,000 hours of experimental services to domestic and international research teams since its full trial operation began in early 2023, according to IOP.

    Chen Xianhui, an academician of CAS and a professor at the University of Science and Technology of China, said: “SECUF is like an ‘all-rounder’ in scientific research. Its integrated capabilities across multiple extreme conditions are rare globally. This ‘one-stop’ research platform offers unique support for fundamental studies.”

    Cheng Jinguang, deputy director of IOP, said that the essence of SECUF lies in its “openness and sharing,” which is completely consistent with the concept of international large-scale scientific facilities. Operating under international standards, SECUF opens global user applications twice a year. Proposals are reviewed and selected by a user committee, and all approved experiments are offered free of charge to global researchers.

    “SECUF allows us to conduct experiments that cannot be done in Europe,” said Igor Vinograd, a young scientist from the Grenoble High Magnetic Field Laboratory in France’s National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS), adding that SECUF enables far more complex and time-intensive precision experiments.

    Yoshiya Uwatoko, a professor from University of Tokyo, affirmed SECUF’s global standing. He said that SECUF is a world-class research facility vital to the international condensed matter physics community.

    Its stable high magnetic fields, combined with low-temperature capabilities and high-precision measurement systems, allow scientists to probe subtle quantum states under pressure. Its ability to maintain experimental conditions over extended periods is invaluable for pressure studies which have extremely high requirements for precise control and stability, Uwatoko said.

    “China has become a global leader in materials research and experimental infrastructure. Collaborating with Chinese institutions grants access to cutting-edge facilities like SECUF. Such partnerships accelerate discovery and foster long-term scientific exchange,” he added.

    In 2024, IOP and the Max Planck Institute for Chemical Physics of Solids in Germany established the Joint Research Center for Quantum Materials and Physics under Extreme Conditions, leveraging SECUF’s capabilities. Collaborative results have since been published in academic journals.

    “SECUF’s hardware is outstanding and fully capable of supporting frontier research. What impressed me most was the team’s execution efficiency — from agreement signing to project implementation. This reflects exceptional scientific management professionalism,” said Sergey Medvedev, a senior researcher at the Max Planck Institute for Chemical Physics of Solids.

    Ariando Ariando, a professor from the National University of Singapore, highlighted that China’s advancements in physics over the past two decades — both in research caliber and experimental facilities — have been astounding.

    “SECUF’s high-pressure and high-magnetic-field capabilities are precisely what our quantum research requires. We look forward to fruitful collaboration,” he said.

    In February this year, SECUF passed national acceptance inspection and is now fully operational. To create a seamless “barrier-free” soft environment, it is making efforts to enhance its global accessibility include optimizing its English website, preparing comprehensive English manuals, and ensuring all facility signage includes English descriptions, according to IOP.

    As a new facility, the experimental hours of international users at SECUF currently account for 3 percent to 4 percent of the total hours. This proportion is planned to increase to 20 percent by 2030, transforming the facility into a broader global “scientific stage,” said IOP.

    “We warmly welcome experts and scholars worldwide to conduct research here and share their valuable insights,” said Fang Zhong, a CAS academician and director of IOP.

    MIL OSI China News

  • MIL-Evening Report: Auckland is NZ’s ‘primate city’ but its potential remains caged in by poor planning and vision

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Timothy Welch, Senior Lecturer in Urban Planning, University of Auckland, Waipapa Taumata Rau

    Getty Images

    The recent report comparing Auckland to nine international peer cities delivered an uncomfortable truth: our largest city is falling behind, hampered by car dependency, low-density housing and “weak economic performance”.

    The Deloitte State of the City analysis was no surprise to anyone who has watched successive governments treat the city as a problem to manage, rather than an engine to fuel.

    The report’s findings were stark: Auckland rates 82nd out of 84 cities globally for pedestrian friendliness, and its car-dependent transport system is more carbon-intensive and slower to decarbonise than peer cities.

    This is the direct result of decades of planning failures, including what urban researchers call the 1970s “great down-zoning” which halved central Auckland’s housing capacity.

    This isn’t just Auckland’s problem. When we mismanage what geographers call a “primate city,” it reveals our fundamental misunderstanding of how modern economies work.

    The concept of the primate city was formalised by geographer Mark Jefferson in 1939. Such cities are defined as being “at least twice as large as the next largest city and more than twice as significant”.

    Auckland fits this definition perfectly. With more than 1.7 million people, it is over four times larger than Christchurch or the greater Wellington region. The city accounts for 34% of New Zealand’s population and is projected to hit 40% of the working-age population by 2048.

    Auckland contributes 38% of New Zealand’s gross domestic product and its per-capita GDP is 15% higher than the rest of the country’s. Its most productive area, the central business district, enjoys a 40% productivity premium over the national average.

    To economists, these numbers represent the “agglomeration benefits” research shows primate cities generate. It is the economic effect of combining businesses, talent and infrastructure.

    Yet New Zealand systematically underinvests in the very place generating this outsized economic contribution.

    A pattern of infrastructure failure

    Auckland’s infrastructure deficit follows a predictable pattern. The City Rail Link, while progressing, has grown from an initial budget of NZ$2-3 billion to $5.5 billion, with opening delayed until 2026.

    Light rail was cancelled entirely after years of planning. A second harbour crossing has been studied for decades without a shovel hitting dirt. Each represents billions in opportunity costs while congestion worsens.

    This goes well beyond project mismanagement. It is a deep structural problem.

    The Infrastructure Commission-Te Waihanga identifies a $210 billion national infrastructure shortfall, with Auckland bearing a disproportionate burden despite generating a disproportionately high level of revenue.

    International research by the OECD shows successful countries treat metropolitan regions as engines of national growth, not a burden.

    The ‘Wellington problem’

    Public policy expert Ian Shirley called it the “Wellington Problem”: the way Auckland’s governance became an obsession for politicians and bureaucrats based in Wellington.

    The tension dates to 1865 when the capital was moved from Auckland to Wellington, establishing a pattern where political power was deliberately separated from economic power.

    Auckland loses an estimated $415.35 million annually in GST collected on rates. This goes to Wellington and into government revenue rather than being reinvested locally. Central government properties in Auckland, worth $36.3 million in rates, are exempt from payment while still using Auckland’s infrastructure.

    When Auckland speaks with “one voice” through its unified council, Wellington responds with legislative overrides.

    The recent National Land Transport Programme, for example, cut Auckland’s transport funding by $564 million. Mayor Wayne Brown said the government’s transport policy “makes zero sense for Auckland”.

    Learning from others

    The contrast with international approaches reveals just how counterproductive New Zealand’s approach has been.

    London has an integrated Transport for London authority with congestion charging powers, generating £136 million annually for reinvestment. Paris is investing more than €35 billion in the Grand Paris Express transit project.

    Japan’s “Quality Infrastructure Investment” principles include ¥13.2 trillion in regional infrastructure investment. Australia’s A$120 billion infrastructure programme explicitly recognises its largest cities contribute over 50% of GDP and require proportional investment.

    Research has shown excessive urban concentration in one country can create problems. But denying the primate city resources only leads to a “deterioration in the quality of life” that drags down the entire national economy.

    The solution lies in making strategic investments that maximise the benefits of agglomeration while managing any negative costs to the national economy.

    Growing pains

    Auckland isn’t a problem to be managed, it is an asset to be leveraged. Every successful developed economy has learned this lesson. Paris generates 31% of France’s GDP and gets treated accordingly.

    Seoul produces 23% of South Korea’s output and receives massive infrastructure investment. Tokyo drives Japan’s economy.

    The international evidence is unambiguous: countries that strategically invest in their primate cities achieve higher productivity growth and maintain competitive advantages.

    Auckland doesn’t need sympathy or special treatment. It needs what every primate city in every successful economy gets: infrastructure investment proportional to its economic contribution, governance structures that reflect its scale, and political leadership that understands agglomeration economics.

    The question isn’t whether Auckland is too big. The question is whether New Zealand is big enough to nurture its primate city.

    Timothy Welch does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. Auckland is NZ’s ‘primate city’ but its potential remains caged in by poor planning and vision – https://theconversation.com/auckland-is-nzs-primate-city-but-its-potential-remains-caged-in-by-poor-planning-and-vision-261176

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Ministers Burke and Dillon Initiate Public Consultation on Review of Employment Permit Occupations lists

    Source: Government of Ireland – Department of Jobs Enterprise and Innovation

    Peter Burke, Minister for Enterprise, Tourism and Employment, and Alan Dillon, Minister of State for Small Business, Retail and Employment, have today announced the opening of the consultation period inviting submissions from stakeholders on the status of occupations on the employment permits Occupations Lists. The Lists are used to administer Ireland’s employment permits policy. They consist of the Ineligible Occupations List – occupations for which there is an adequate supply of labour and skills with Ireland and the EEA, and for which an employment permit will not be issued, and the Critical Skills Occupations List – occupations in short supply in Ireland and across the EEA.

    The last review of the occupations lists took place in 2023, and resulted in 11 additional roles being placed on the Critical Skills Occupations List, and 32 roles being made eligible for a General Employment Permit. 

    Minister Burke said:

    “I am delighted to launch this next review of the eligible occupations for employment permits. At a time of full employment, with over 2.81 million people at work, and with 90,000 new jobs created in the last year, it is vital that we continue to have a strong and flexible employment permits system to allow non-EEA nationals to fill the skill and labour gaps we cannot access in Ireland or Europe and to ensure our economy remains competitive. 

    “As demonstrated by the changes made to the employment permit system over the last year, the system is responsive to the needs of the sectors and industries it serves. This full review will allow us to ensure the system remains up-to-date in a way that serves both workers and employers.”

    Minister Dillon added:

    “Our economic migration policy accommodates the arrival of non-EEA nationals to fill skills and labour gaps in the domestic economy in the short to medium term. These workers are a vital part of the Irish economy. My Department’s reviews of the system promote an integrated approach to address these labour market deficiencies in the longer term and ensure we can continue to meet our labour needs.

    “Where employers or stakeholders are facing challenges in recruiting a specific occupation and believe it should be eligible for an employment permit, or believe a certain occupation should move onto the critical skills list, now is their opportunity to share this feedback.

    “With the consultation running over the summer period, there is plenty of time for interested employers and sectors who use the employment permits system to provide their feedback. Employer’s observations are vital in helping inform the department on how the list system is operating and where it can be improved.”

    The submission process is an opportunity for stakeholders to provide additional information and potentially different perspectives on the nature and extent of skill shortages.  

    Submissions will be accepted through the online consultation form made available on the Department’s website and will be open from 23 July to 19 September.

    Notes for Editor

    Background

    The Employment Permits System

    The Irish State’s general policy is to promote the sourcing of labour and skills needs from within the workforce of Ireland, the European Union and other EEA states. Policy in relation to applications for employment permits remains focused on facilitating the recruitment from outside the EEA of highly skilled personnel, where the requisite skills cannot be met by normal recruitment or by training.  Employment permit policy is part of the response to addressing skills deficits which exist and are likely to continue into the medium term, but it is not intended over the longer term to act as a substitute for meeting the challenge of up-skilling the State’s resident workforce, with an emphasis on the process of lifelong learning, and on maximising the potential of EEA nationals to fill our skills deficits.

    The Occupations Lists

    The Employment Permits system is designed to attract highly skilled workers from outside the EEA to Ireland, to meet skills demand in the economy where those skills can’t be accessed through the resident labour force.  For the purposes of the employment permits system, occupations fall into three categories:

    • Occupations listed on the Critical Skills Occupations List are highly skilled professional roles that are in high demand and are not always available in the resident labour force.  Occupations on this list are eligible for a Critical Skills Employment Permit (CSEP) and include roles such as medicine, ICT, sciences, finance and business.  Special “fast-track” conditions attach to this permit type including the eligibility to apply to the Department of Justice for family members to accompany the permit holder immediately; and after two years may apply to the Department of Justice for permission to work without the requirement for an employment permit. 
    • Ineligible occupations are those with evidence suggesting there are sufficient Irish/EEA workers to fill such vacancies. Employment permits are not granted for these occupations.
    • Every other job in the labour market, where an employer cannot find a worker, is eligible for an employment permit.  For General Employment Permits, Seasonal Employment Permits and Contract for Services Employment Permits the employer is required to undertake a Labour Market Needs Test. If no-one suitable applies for the job, the employer is free to apply for an employment permit. Occupations such as these may be skills of a more general nature and are typically eligible for a General Employment Permit (GEP).  This permit type is renewable and after five years the applicant may apply to the Department of Justice for long term residency permission.  

    The Critical Skills and Ineligible Occupations Lists Review

    It is vital that the employment permits scheme is responsive to changes in economic circumstances and labour market conditions. Therefore, it is necessary to review the Critical Skills and Ineligible Occupations Lists periodically, in accordance with the changing needs of the labour market. 

    The review process utilises research undertaken by the Expert Group on Future Skills Needs (EGFSN) and other experts in the labour market, including the Skills and Labour Market Research Unit (SLMRU) at SOLAS. The Department also invites submissions from industry representatives, other Government Departments and any other stakeholders who might have a case to make, via a periodic open consultation on the Department’s website. The Department also seeks the observations of the Inter-Departmental Group which oversees the review process.

    An occupation may be considered for inclusion on the critical skills occupation list or removal from the ineligible lists provided that:

    • shortage exists across the occupation, despite attempts by industry to train and there are no suitable Irish/EEA nationals available to undertake the work;
    • development opportunities for Irish/EEA nationals are not undermined;
    • genuine skills shortage exists and that it is not a recruitment or retention problem; and
    • the Government education, training, employment and economic development policies are supported.

    Submission process

    As part of this review process, submissions are sought from employers, representative bodies, Government Departments, Agencies, and other interested parties relating to occupations currently included on or absent from the lists.

    The submission process is an opportunity for stakeholders to provide additional information and potentially different perspectives on the nature and extent of skill shortages.  Stakeholder submissions are a vital source of information, helping inform the Department’s final assessment of the status of occupations. 

    ENDS

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Vermont Delegation Meets with Dylan Collins, Demands Accountability for Targeted Attack Against International Journalists in Lebanon 

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator Peter Welch (D-Vermont)
    WASHINGTON, D.C.—U.S. Senator Peter Welch (D-Vt.) today met with Dylan Collins, a Vermonter and video journalist for the Agence France-Presse (AFP) news agency, who was attacked and wounded by Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) while reporting in Southern Lebanon. Representatives for Senator Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Representative Becca Balint (D-VT-At Large) also attended the meeting.  
    The Vermont Congressional Delegation released the following statement of support for Mr. Collins:  
    “For two years, we have sought accountability for Dylan Collins, a Vermonter who was wounded in a targeted attack on international journalists in southern Lebanon by Israeli Defense Forces. A Reuters journalist was killed instantly, AFP’s Christina Assi suffered catastrophic injuries, including losing her right leg, and Mr. Collins and four others were wounded by shrapnel. Multiple credible independent investigations indicate that the attack by Israeli soldiers was a deliberate targeting of individuals who were clearly identified as journalists.  
    “We have demanded answers from both the Biden and Trump Administrations. The United States government has a responsibility to investigate and obtain accountability for an attack on an American citizen. This Administration has yet to recognize this obligation to Mr. Collins. Our delegation will continue to seek accountability for this shocking misuse of lethal force through legislation, including restrictions on taxpayer-funded weapons for Israel.” 
    Independent investigations conducted by Reuters, Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, Agence France-Presse (AFP), and others have concluded that the IDF’s October 2023 attack on international journalists, including Dylan Collins, in southern Lebanon was targeted and deliberate. 
    Nine American citizens, including Palestinian-American journalist Shireen Abu Akleh, have been killed by IDF forces or settlers since 2022. The killings have been met by a lack of accountability from the Israeli government and a pattern of indifference by the U.S. government. These failures have contributed to an unacceptable culture of impunity when it comes to ensuring accountability for the deaths of Americans, journalists, and tens of thousands of Palestinian civilians in the West Bank, Gaza, Lebanon, and Syria. 
    Reports by the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) have revealed that at least 186journalists and media workers have been killed in Gaza, the West Bank, Israel, and Lebanonsince the conflict began on October 7, 2024, making it the deadliest period for journalists since CPJ began gathering data in 1992. 

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: New operational partnership with delivery giants to combat illegal working

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    News story

    New operational partnership with delivery giants to combat illegal working

    New agreement between Home Office and top food delivery firms will help stop illegal working in the delivery sector

    More delivery riders caught sharing their accounts with migrants who have no right to work in the UK will be suspended, as part of the government’s UK-wide crackdown on illegal working under the Plan for Change.

    A new agreement between the Home Office and Deliveroo, Just Eat and Uber Eats will ensure delivery firms receive new information concerning the locations of asylum hotels to help tackle illegal working.

    Under existing security measures, any delivery riders caught sharing their accounts with migrants who have no right to work in the UK will be suspended. This new agreement goes further to ensure more people who are breaking the rules can be caught.  

    Efforts by the companies to crack down on illegal account sharing through real-time identity and Right to Work checks have been successful and have led to thousands being offboarded from platforms. Despite this, there continues to be abuse in the system. Under the new agreement, the firms will be empowered to go further in detecting patterns of misuse, identify unauthorised account sharing and quickly suspend accounts.

    The move comes after a commitment made by the firms during a roundtable last month, chaired by Ministers, to implement new security measures. This includes increased facial verification checks and fraud detection tools meaning only verified users can access their platforms. The Home Office will continue to collaborate closely with the three companies, with meetings taking place in the coming weeks to update on progress and delivery.

    Today’s announcement is part of the government’s work to step up enforcement across the UK targeting illegal working hotspots, with a focus on the gig economy and migrants working illegally as delivery riders. It forms a key part of a whole system approach to tackle illegal migration from every angle, by ending the false promise of jobs used by smuggling gangs to sell spaces on small boats.

    Home Secretary Yvette Cooper, said:

    Illegal working undermines honest business, exploits vulnerable individuals and fuels organised immigration crime.

    By enhancing our data sharing with delivery companies, we are taking decisive action to close loopholes and increase enforcement.

    The changes come alongside a 50% increase in raids and arrests for illegal working under the Plan for Change, greater security measures and tough new legislation.

    Eddy Montgomery, Director of Enforcement, Compliance and Crime at the Home Office, said:

    This next step of co-ordinated working with delivery firms will help us target those who seek to work illegally in the gig economy and exploit their status in the UK.

    My teams will continue to carry out increased enforcement activity across the UK and I welcome this additional tool to disrupt and stop the abuse of our immigration system.

    A Deliveroo spokesperson said:

    Deliveroo has led the sector in introducing security measures to prevent the abuse of our platform and tackle the sophisticated criminals seeking new ways to exploit all delivery platforms’ systems. We are fully committed to working with the government as we continue to collectively combat illegal working.

    A Just Eat spokesperson said:

    Just Eat is committed to tackling any illegal working via our platform. We continue to invest significant resources to strengthen our systems against abuse by individuals and organised criminal groups seeking to evade right to work rules. We are working closely with the Home Office and our industry partners to address any loopholes in the industry’s checks, as well as collaborating on data sharing and enforcement.

    An Uber Eats spokesperson said:

    Uber Eats is fully committed to tackling illegal work and will continue to work with the Home Office and industry. We have introduced a range of state of the art detection tools to find and remove fraudulent accounts. We are constantly reviewing our tools and finding new ways to detect and take action on people who are trying to work illegally.

    Since the government came into power one year ago, there have been more than 10,000 illegal working visits across multiple sectors, leading to 7,130 arrests, up around 50% compared to the year before. This marks the first time in a 12-month period where more than 10,000 visits have taken place.

    Almost 750 illegal working civil penalty notices were also handed to businesses caught violating immigration rules in the first quarter of the year, marking the highest level since 2016 – and an 80% increase compared to the same time last year. 

    The government is tightening the law by making it a legal requirement for all companies, including the gig economy, to check that anyone working for them has the legal right to do so. This will end the abuse of flexible working arrangements. The new measures will be introduced through the landmark Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill.

    The fight against illegal working forms just one part of government’s work to bolster border security across the system.

    Since coming into power one year ago, the government has returned 35,000 people with no right to be in the UK including failed asylum seekers, immigration and foreign national offenders. There are now fewer asylum hotels open than since the election, saving millions of taxpayers’ money.

    This is on top of a new groundbreaking deal with the French which will mean that, for the very first time, illegal migrants will be sent back to France. This targets the heart of the criminal smuggling gangs’ business model and sends a clear message that these life-threatening journeys are pointless and a waste of thousands of pounds. 

    The deal seeks to detain and return migrants who arrive via small boat, and an equal number of migrants will be able to come to the UK from France through a new legal route – fully documented and subject to strict security checks.

    Updates to this page

    Published 22 July 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI Russia: Iran FM: Lifting sanctions, respecting country’s nuclear rights necessary to resume talks with US

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: People’s Republic of China in Russian – People’s Republic of China in Russian –

    An important disclaimer is at the bottom of this article.

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    TEHRAN, July 22 (Xinhua) — Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said on Tuesday that his country is ready to resume indirect talks with the United States on the condition that sanctions are lifted and Tehran’s right to use nuclear technology for “peaceful” purposes is respected.

    The diplomat made the statement at a meeting with members of the Iranian parliament’s National Security and Foreign Policy Committee, as reported by the official Iranian news agency IRNA, citing committee member Yaghub Rezazadeh.

    According to the legislator, A. Araghchi noted that “if sanctions are lifted and Iran’s right to use peaceful nuclear technologies is respected, indirect negotiations with the United States will take place before the issue of /activating/ the sanctions rollback mechanism is raised in October.”

    The sanctions snapback mechanism is part of the 2015 Iran nuclear deal, formally known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA). It allows other parties to reimpose all international sanctions if Iran fails to comply with the agreement.

    As Y. Rezazadeh pointed out, in addition, the head of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs announced preparations for negotiations on the Iranian nuclear program between Iran and Russia, as well as a meeting of representatives of Iran and three European countries – France, Great Britain and Germany, which is scheduled to take place on July 25 in Istanbul and will be devoted to the same issue.

    Iran signed the JCPOA with six countries – Britain, China, France, Germany, Russia and the United States – in July 2015. Under the deal, Tehran agreed to curb its nuclear program in exchange for sanctions relief.

    In 2018, the United States unilaterally withdrew from the deal and reimposed sanctions on Iran, prompting Tehran to begin gradually backtracking on its nuclear commitments. –0–

    Please note: This information is raw content obtained directly from the source of the information. It is an accurate report of what the source claims and does not necessarily reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    .

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI: Baker Hughes Company Announces Second-Quarter 2025 Results

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Second-quarter highlights

    • Orders of $7.0 billion, including $3.5 billion of IET orders.
    • RPO of $34.0 billion, including record IET RPO of $31.3 billion.
    • Revenue of $6.9 billion, down 3% year-over-year.
    • Attributable net income of $701 million.
    • GAAP diluted EPS of $0.71 and adjusted diluted EPS* of $0.63.
    • Adjusted EBITDA* of $1,212 million, up 7% year-over-year.
    • Cash flows from operating activities of $510 million and free cash flow* of $239 million.
    • Returns to shareholders of $423 million, including $196 million of share repurchases.

    HOUSTON and LONDON, July 22, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Baker Hughes Company (Nasdaq: BKR) (“Baker Hughes” or the “Company”) announced results today for the second quarter of 2025.

    “We delivered strong second-quarter results, with total adjusted EBITDA margins increasing 170 basis points year-over-year to 17.5% despite a modest decline in revenue. This performance reflects the benefits of structural cost improvements and continued deployment of our business system, which is driving higher productivity, stronger operating leverage and more durable earnings across the company,” said Lorenzo Simonelli, Baker Hughes Chairman and Chief Executive Officer.

    “IET orders totaled $3.5 billion in the quarter, resulting in another record backlog for the segment. Importantly, order momentum remained strong, supported by more than $550 million of data center related orders, despite the absence of large LNG awards. Following a strong first half and a positive outlook for second half awards, we are confident of achieving the full-year order guidance range for IET.”

    “We remain confident in our ability to deliver solid performance in 2025, with continued growth in IET helping to offset softness in more market-sensitive areas of OFSE – underscoring the strength of our portfolio and the benefits of our strategic diversification. Accordingly, we are raising our full-year revenue and EBITDA guidance for IET and reestablishing full-year guidance for OFSE.”

    “During the quarter, we also announced three strategic transactions to advance our portfolio optimization strategy, reinforcing efforts to enhance the durability of earnings and cash flow while creating long-term value for shareholders. These actions are designed to unlock value from non-core businesses in our portfolio and redeploy that capital into higher-margin opportunities that fit our financial and strategic frameworks.”

    “We are progressing with our strategy of positioning the company for sustainable, differentiated growth and commend the focus and dedication of our people in executing this strategy,” concluded Simonelli.

    * Non-GAAP measure. See reconciliations in the section titled “Reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP Financial Measures.”

        Three Months Ended   Variance
    (in millions except per share amounts)   June 30, 2025 March 31, 2025 June 30, 2024   Sequential Year-over-year
    Orders   $ 7,032   $ 6,459   $ 7,526     9 % (7 %)
    Revenue     6,910     6,427     7,139     8 % (3 %)
    Net income attributable to Baker Hughes     701     402     579     74 % 21 %
    Adjusted net income attributable to Baker Hughes*     623     509     568     22 % 10 %
    Adjusted EBITDA*     1,212     1,037     1,130     17 % 7 %
    Diluted earnings per share (EPS)     0.71     0.40     0.58     76 % 22 %
    Adjusted diluted EPS*     0.63     0.51     0.57     23 % 11 %
    Cash flow from operating activities     510     709     348     (28 %) 47 %
    Free cash flow*     239     454     106     (47 %) F


    * Non-GAAP measure. See reconciliations in the section titled “Reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP Financial Measures.”

    Certain columns and rows in our tables and financial statements may not sum up due to the use of rounded numbers.

    “F” is used in most instances when variance is above 100%. Additionally, “U” is used when variance is below (100)%.

    Quarter Highlights

    Executing our portfolio optimization strategy

    In the second quarter, Baker Hughes announced three strategic transactions, all of which reflect a disciplined capital allocation framework and a focus on core businesses with strong return potential.

    First, the Company signed an agreement to form a joint venture with a subsidiary of Cactus, Inc., contributing the Oilfield Services & Equipment’s (OFSE) Surface Pressure Control (SPC) product line in exchange for approximately $345 million while maintaining a minority ownership stake.

    Second, the Company announced an agreement to sell the Precision Sensors & Instrumentation (PSI) product line within Industrial & Energy Technology (IET) to Crane Company for approximately $1.15 billion. These proceeds will enhance the Company’s flexibility to reinvest in higher-growth, higher-return areas that support further margin expansion and improved returns.

    Finally, Baker Hughes agreed to acquire Continental Disc Corporation (CDC), a leading provider of pressure management solutions, for approximately $540 million. The CDC acquisition strengthens the IET Industrial Products portfolio with a highly complementary, margin-accretive business that expands the Company’s position in the flow and pressure control market and enhances recurring, lifecycle driven revenue.

    Key awards and technology achievements

    The Company continued to support the development of critical data center projects, with year-to-date data center awards of more than $650 million. IET received an award to supply 30 NovaLT™ turbines, representing our largest data center award to-date. The turbines, alongside other associated Baker Hughes equipment, will deliver up to 500 megawatts (MW) of reliable and efficient power for data center development across various U.S. locations.

    Frontier Infrastructure awarded a contract for NovaLT™ turbines, delivering up to 270 MW of power for its data center projects in Wyoming and Texas. This follows the March 2025 enterprise-wide agreement to accelerate large scale carbon capture and storage (CCS) and power solutions.

    Baker Hughes continues to grow the pipeline of future data center opportunities. At the Saudi-U.S. Investment Forum in May, the Company signed an MoU with DataVolt that plans to power data centers globally, including the NEOM project in the Kingdom that intends to utilize Baker Hughes’ multi-fuel NovaLT™ technology solution.

    In addition to growing demand from data center applications, IET experienced increased demand for NovaLT™ turbines in the gas infrastructure sector. During the second quarter, the segment secured an award for four gas turbines to support Aramco’s Master Gas System III pipeline project. Including this award, we have secured a total of $2.9 billion in gas infrastructure equipment orders over the past six quarters.

    Highlighting the durability of IET’s lifecycle model, the segment was awarded several aftermarket services contracts. In Gas Technology Services (GTS), the Company secured more than $350 million of Contractual Services Agreements (CSA) during the quarter. We signed a maintenance agreement with Belayim Petroleum Company (“Petrobel”) to improve uptime and reliability of critical turbomachinery equipment in Egypt. Also in GTS, we renewed a multi-year service agreement with Oman LNG, including resident engineering support along with digital remote monitoring and diagnostics services delivered through iCenter™.

    The Company gained further traction with New Energy globally, with year-to-date bookings now totaling $1.25 billion. In Climate Technology Solutions (CTS), we secured one of our largest CCS orders to-date, providing compression technology for a CCS hub in the Middle East. Also in CTS, we signed a framework agreement with Energinet in Denmark to supply 16 reciprocating compressor packages, supporting an increase in biogas production while driving methane and CO2 emissions reduction for gas infrastructure across the country.

    Industrial Technology continued to demonstrate strong momentum across multiple end markets. In Industrial Solutions, we secured a variety of awards for our Cordant™ suite of solutions. This includes an award from a large NOC to deploy Asset Performance Management across several compression stations in the Middle East, and an award from NOVA Chemicals to optimize maintenance spend and maximize production.

    OFSE maintained strong momentum in Mature Assets Solutions around the globe. In Angola, OFSE was awarded multi-year production solutions contracts for chemicals, artificial lift, and digital services to support a major operator’s offshore activities. In Kazakhstan, the TOPAN and Baker Hughes joint venture secured a critical production chemicals and services award. In Norway, Equinor awarded OFSE a contract to industrialize offshore plug and abandonment (P&A) operations in the Oseberg East field, which followed the announcement of a multi-year P&A framework agreement for integrated well services.

    OFSE saw continued adoption of Leucipa™ automated field production solution, securing an award from Repsol for next-generation AI capabilities following the MoU signed in October 2024. The Company also signed an agreement with ENI to deploy Leucipa for electric submersible pumps (ESP) optimization and AI-powered predictive failure analytics in the Middle East.

    Also in the Middle East, Baker Hughes signed a master services agreement with Aramco for installation and maintenance of ESPs across the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

    In North America, OFSE secured a multi-year contract to provide drag reducing chemicals to be deployed on Genesis Energy’s Cameron Highway Oil Pipeline and Poseidon systems, each of which is operated and 64% owned by Genesis Energy. To support this agreement, OFSE will expand its chemicals manufacturing footprint and deploy Leucipa. Additionally, bp awarded OFSE a multi-year chemicals management services contract to optimize throughput and asset reliability in the U.S. Gulf Coast.

    In Germany, OFSE successfully drilled Lower Saxony’s first productive deep geothermal exploration well, a project that leverages OFSE’s integrated well construction and production capabilities and the Company’s industry-leading subsurface-to-surface digital solutions to monitor and optimize operational performance.

    Consolidated Financial Results

    Revenue for the quarter was $6,910 million, an increase of 8% sequentially and down $229 million year-over-year. The decrease in revenue year-over-year was driven by a decrease in OFSE partially offset by an increase in IET.

    The Company’s total book-to-bill ratio in the second quarter of 2025 was 1.0; the IET book-to-bill ratio was 1.1.

    Net income as determined in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for the second quarter of 2025 was $701 million. Net income increased $299 million sequentially and increased $122 million year-over-year.

    Adjusted net income (a non-GAAP financial measure) for the second quarter of 2025 was $623 million, which excludes adjustments totaling $78 million. A list of the adjusting items and associated reconciliation from GAAP has been provided in Table 1b in the section titled “Reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP Financial Measures.” Adjusted net income for the second quarter of 2025 was up 22% sequentially and up 10% year-over-year.

    Depreciation and amortization for the second quarter of 2025 was $293 million.

    Adjusted EBITDA (a non-GAAP financial measure) for the second quarter of 2025 was $1,212 million, which excludes adjustments totaling $102 million. See Table 1a in the section titled “Reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP Financial Measures.” Adjusted EBITDA for the second quarter was up 17% sequentially and up 7% year-over-year.

    The sequential increase in adjusted net income and adjusted EBITDA was primarily driven by an increase in volume, favorable FX, and overall productivity. The year-over-year increase in adjusted net income and adjusted EBITDA was driven by productivity and structural cost out initiatives, favorable FX, partially offset by lower volume in OFSE, and cost inflation in both segments.

    Other Financial Items

    Remaining Performance Obligations (“RPO”) in the second quarter of 2025 ended at $34 billion, an increase of $0.8 billion from the first quarter of 2025. OFSE RPO was $2.7 billion, down 3% sequentially, while IET RPO was $31.3 billion, up 3% sequentially. Within IET RPO, GTE RPO was $11.3 billion, and GTS RPO was $15.6 billion.

    Income tax expense in the second quarter of 2025 was $256 million.

    Other (income) expense, net in the second quarter of 2025 was $(134) million, primarily related to changes in fair value for equity securities of $(119) million.

    GAAP diluted earnings per share was $0.71. Adjusted diluted earnings per share (a non-GAAP financial measure) was $0.63. Excluded from adjusted diluted earnings per share were all items listed in Table 1b in the section titled “Reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP Financial Measures.”

    Cash flow from operating activities was $510 million for the second quarter of 2025. Free cash flow (a non-GAAP financial measure) for the quarter was $239 million. A reconciliation from GAAP has been provided in Table 1c in the section titled “Reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP Financial Measures.”

    Capital expenditures, net of proceeds from disposal of assets, were $271 million for the second quarter of 2025, of which $184 million was for OFSE and $68 million was for IET.

    Results by Reporting Segment

    The following segment discussions and variance explanations are intended to reflect management’s view of the relevant comparisons of financial results on a sequential or year-over-year basis, depending on the business dynamics of the reporting segments.

    Oilfield Services & Equipment

    (in millions)   Three Months Ended   Variance
    Segment results   June 30, 2025 March 31, 2025 June 30, 2024   Sequential Year-over-year
    Orders   $ 3,503   $ 3,281   $ 4,068     7 % (14 %)
    Revenue   $ 3,617   $ 3,499   $ 4,011     3 % (10 %)
    EBITDA   $ 677   $ 623   $ 716     9 % (5 %)
    EBITDA margin     18.7 %   17.8 %   17.8 %   0.9pts 0.9pts
    (in millions)   Three Months Ended   Variance
    Revenue by Product Line   June 30, 2025 March 31, 2025 June 30, 2024   Sequential Year-over-year
    Well Construction   $ 921   $ 892   $ 1,090     3 % (16 %)
    Completions, Intervention, and Measurements     935     925     1,118     1 % (16 %)
    Production Solutions     968     899     958     8 % 1 %
    Subsea & Surface Pressure Systems     793     782     845     1 % (6 %)
    Total Revenue   $ 3,617   $ 3,499   $ 4,011     3 % (10 %)
    (in millions)   Three Months Ended   Variance
    Revenue by Geographic Region   June 30, 2025 March 31, 2025 June 30, 2024   Sequential Year-over-year
    North America   $ 928   $ 922   $ 1,023     1 % (9 %)
    Latin America     639     568     663     12 % (4 %)
    Europe/CIS/Sub-Saharan Africa     653     580     827     13 % (21 %)
    Middle East/Asia     1,398     1,429     1,498     (2 %) (7 %)
    Total Revenue   $ 3,617   $ 3,499   $ 4,011     3 % (10 %)
                   
    North America   $ 928   $ 922   $ 1,023     1 % (9 %)
    International   $ 2,689   $ 2,577   $ 2,988     4 % (10 %)


    EBITDA excludes depreciation and amortization of
    $233 million, $226 million, and $223 million for the three months ended June 30, 2025, March 31, 2025, and June 30, 2024, respectively. EBITDA margin is defined as EBITDA divided by revenue.

    OFSE orders of $3,503 million for the second quarter of 2025 increased by 7% sequentially. Subsea and Surface Pressure Systems orders were $698 million, up 31% sequentially, and down 21% year-over-year.

    OFSE revenue of $3,617 million for the second quarter of 2025 was up 3% sequentially, and down 10% year-over-year.

    North America revenue was $928 million, up 1% sequentially. International revenue was $2,689 million, up 4% sequentially, with increase in all regions with the exception of Middle East and Asia.

    Segment EBITDA for the second quarter of 2025 was $677 million, an increase of $54 million, or 9% sequentially. The sequential increase in EBITDA was primarily driven by productivity, structural cost-out initiatives, volume increase, partially offset by inflation and revenue mix.

    Industrial & Energy Technology

    (in millions)   Three Months Ended   Variance
    Segment results   June 30, 2025 March 31, 2025 June 30, 2024   Sequential Year-over-year
    Orders   $ 3,530   $ 3,178   $ 3,458     11 % 2 %
    Revenue   $ 3,293   $ 2,928   $ 3,128     12 % 5 %
    EBITDA   $ 585   $ 501   $ 497     17 % 18 %
    EBITDA margin     17.8 %   17.1 %   15.9 %   0.7pts 1.9pts
    (in millions)   Three Months Ended   Variance
    Orders by Product Line   June 30, 2025 March 31, 2025 June 30, 2024   Sequential Year-over-year
    Gas Technology Equipment   $ 781   $ 1,335   $ 1,493     (42 %) (48 %)
    Gas Technology Services     986     913     769     8 % 28 %
    Total Gas Technology     1,767     2,248     2,261     (21 %) (22 %)
    Industrial Products     513     501     524     2 % (2 %)
    Industrial Solutions     327     281     281     16 % 16 %
    Total Industrial Technology     839     782     805     7 % 4 %
    Climate Technology Solutions     923     148     392     F F
    Total Orders   $ 3,530   $ 3,178   $ 3,458     11 % 2 %
    (in millions)   Three Months Ended   Variance
    Revenue by Product Line   June 30, 2025 March 31, 2025 June 30, 2024   Sequential Year-over-year
    Gas Technology Equipment   $ 1,624   $ 1,456   $ 1,539     12 % 6 %
    Gas Technology Services     752     592     691     27 % 9 %
    Total Gas Technology     2,377     2,047     2,230     16 % 7 %
    Industrial Products     488     445     509     10 % (4 %)
    Industrial Solutions     273     258     262     6 % 4 %
    Total Industrial Technology     761     703     770     8 % (1 %)
    Climate Technology Solutions     156     178     128     (12 %) 22 %
    Total Revenue   $ 3,293   $ 2,928   $ 3,128     12 % 5 %


    EBITDA excludes depreciation and amortization of
    $56 million, $53 million, and $55 million for the three months ended June 30, 2025, March 31, 2025, and June 30, 2024, respectively. EBITDA margin is defined as EBITDA divided by revenue.

    “F” is used in most instances when variance is above 100%. Additionally, “U” is used when variance is below (100)%.

    IET orders of $3,530 million for the second quarter of 2025 increased by $72 million, or 2% year-over-year. The increase was driven primarily by Climate Technology Solutions and partially offset by Gas Technology.

    IET revenue of $3,293 million for the second quarter of 2025 increased $165 million, or 5% year-over-year. The increase was driven by Gas Technology Equipment, up $85 million or 6% year-over-year, Gas Technology Services, up $61 million or 9% year-over-year, and Climate Technology Solutions, up $28 million or 22% year-over-year.

    Segment EBITDA for the quarter was $585 million, an increase of $88 million, or 18% year-over-year. The year-over-year increase in segment EBITDA was driven by positive pricing, favorable FX, and productivity, partially offset by cost inflation.

    Reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP Financial Measures

    Management provides non-GAAP financial measures because it believes such measures are widely accepted financial indicators used by investors and analysts to analyze and compare companies on the basis of operating performance (including adjusted EBITDA; adjusted net income attributable to Baker Hughes; and adjusted diluted earnings per share) and liquidity (free cash flow) and that these measures may be used by investors to make informed investment decisions. Management believes that the exclusion of certain identified items from several key operating performance measures enables us to evaluate our operations more effectively, to identify underlying trends in the business, and to establish operational goals for certain management compensation purposes. Management also believes that free cash flow is an important supplemental measure of our cash performance but should not be considered as a measure of residual cash flow available for discretionary purposes, or as an alternative to cash flow from operating activities presented in accordance with GAAP.

    Table 1a. Reconciliation of Net Income Attributable to Baker Hughes to Adjusted EBITDA and Segment EBITDA

        Three Months Ended
    (in millions)   June 30, 2025 March 31, 2025 June 30, 2024
    Net income attributable to Baker Hughes (GAAP)   $ 701   $ 402   $ 579  
    Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests     10     7     2  
    Provision for income taxes     256     152     243  
    Interest expense, net     54     51     47  
    Depreciation & amortization     293     285     283  
    Change in fair value of equity securities (1)     (119 )   140     (19 )
    Other charges and credits (1)     17         (6 )
    Adjusted EBITDA (non-GAAP)     1,212     1,037     1,130  
    Corporate costs     78     85     83  
    Other (income) / expense not allocated to segments     (28 )   1      
    Total Segment EBITDA (non-GAAP)   $ 1,262   $ 1,124   $ 1,213  
    OFSE     677     623     716  
    IET     585     501     497  


    (1) 
    Change in fair value of equity securities and other charges and credits are reported in “Other (income) expense, net” on the condensed consolidated statements of income (loss).

    Table 1a reconciles net income attributable to Baker Hughes, which is the directly comparable financial result determined in accordance with GAAP, to adjusted EBITDA and Segment EBITDA. Adjusted EBITDA and Segment EBITDA exclude the impact of certain identified items.

    Table 1b. Reconciliation of Net Income Attributable to Baker Hughes to Adjusted Net Income Attributable to Baker Hughes

        Three Months Ended
    (in millions, except per share amounts)   June 30, 2025 March 31, 2025 June 30, 2024
    Net income attributable to Baker Hughes (GAAP)   $ 701   $ 402   $ 579  
    Change in fair value of equity securities     (119 )   140     (19 )
    Other adjustments     17         14  
    Tax adjustments(1)     24     (32 )   (6 )
    Total adjustments, net of income tax     (78 )   108     (11 )
    Less: adjustments attributable to noncontrolling interests              
    Adjustments attributable to Baker Hughes     (78 )   108     (11 )
    Adjusted net income attributable to Baker Hughes (non-GAAP)   $ 623   $ 509   $ 568  
             
    Denominator:        
    Weighted-average shares of Class A common stock outstanding diluted     991     999     1,001  
    Adjusted earnings per share – diluted (non-GAAP)   $ 0.63   $ 0.51   $ 0.57  


    (1) 
    All periods reflect the tax associated with the other (income) loss adjustments.

    Table 1b reconciles net income attributable to Baker Hughes, which is the directly comparable financial result determined in accordance with GAAP, to adjusted net income attributable to Baker Hughes. Adjusted net income attributable to Baker Hughes excludes the impact of certain identified items.

    Table 1c. Reconciliation of Net Cash Flows from Operating Activities to Free Cash Flow

        Three Months Ended
    (in millions)   June 30, 2025 March 31, 2025 June 30, 2024
    Net cash flows from operating activities (GAAP)   $ 510   $ 709   $ 348  
    Add: cash used for capital expenditures, net of proceeds from disposal of assets     (271 )   (255 )   (242 )
    Free cash flow (non-GAAP)   $ 239   $ 454   $ 106  

    Table 1c reconciles net cash flows from operating activities, which is the directly comparable financial result determined in accordance with GAAP, to free cash flow. Free cash flow is defined as net cash flows from operating activities less expenditures for capital assets plus proceeds from disposal of assets.


    Financial Tables (GAAP)

    Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss)
    (Unaudited)
     
        Three Months Ended June 30, Six Months Ended June 30,
    (In millions, except per share amounts)     2025     2024     2025     2024  
    Revenue   $ 6,910   $ 7,139   $ 13,337   $ 13,557  
    Costs and expenses:          
    Cost of revenue     5,295     5,493     10,247     10,469  
    Selling, general and administrative     567     643     1,144     1,261  
    Research and development costs     161     158     307     322  
    Other (income) expense, net     (134 )   (26 )   6     (48 )
    Interest expense, net     54     47     105     88  
    Income before income taxes     967     824     1,528     1,465  
    Provision for income taxes     (256 )   (243 )   (408 )   (421 )
    Net income     711     581     1,120     1,044  
    Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests     10     2     17     10  
    Net income attributable to Baker Hughes Company   $ 701   $ 579   $ 1,103   $ 1,034  
               
    Per share amounts:      
    Basic income per Class A common stock   $ 0.71   $ 0.58   $ 1.11   $ 1.04  
    Diluted income per Class A common stock   $ 0.71   $ 0.58   $ 1.11   $ 1.03  
               
    Weighted average shares:          
    Class A basic     988     996     990     997  
    Class A diluted     991     1,001     995     1,002  
               
    Cash dividend per Class A common stock   $ 0.23   $ 0.21   $ 0.46   $ 0.42  
    Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Position
    (Unaudited)
     
    (In millions)   June 30, 2025 December 31, 2024
    ASSETS
    Current Assets:      
    Cash and cash equivalents   $ 3,087   $ 3,364  
    Current receivables, net     6,511     7,122  
    Inventories, net     5,105     4,954  
    All other current assets     2,915     1,771  
    Total current assets     17,618     17,211  
    Property, plant and equipment, less accumulated depreciation     5,176     5,127  
    Goodwill     5,801     6,078  
    Other intangible assets, net     3,919     3,951  
    Contract and other deferred assets     1,841     1,730  
    All other assets     4,385     4,266  
    Total assets   $ 38,740   $ 38,363  
    LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
    Current Liabilities:      
    Accounts payable   $ 4,340   $ 4,542  
    Short-term debt     66     53  
    Progress collections and deferred income     5,680     5,672  
    All other current liabilities     2,429     2,724  
    Total current liabilities     12,515     12,991  
    Long-term debt     5,968     5,970  
    Liabilities for pensions and other postretirement benefits     997     988  
    All other liabilities     1,392     1,359  
    Equity     17,868     17,055  
    Total liabilities and equity   $ 38,740   $ 38,363  
           
    Outstanding Baker Hughes Company shares:      
    Class A common stock     985     990  
    Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
    (Unaudited)
     
        Three Months Ended June 30, Six Months Ended June 30,
    (In millions)     2025     2025     2024  
    Cash flows from operating activities:        
    Net income   $ 711   $ 1,120   $ 1,044  
    Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flows from operating activities:        
    Depreciation and amortization     293     579     566  
    Stock-based compensation cost     52     102     101  
    Change in fair value of equity securities     (119 )   21     (71 )
    (Benefit) provision for deferred income taxes     36     (17 )   33  
    Working capital     (120 )   98     (36 )
    Other operating items, net     (343 )   (684 )   (505 )
    Net cash flows provided by operating activities     510     1,219     1,132  
    Cash flows from investing activities:        
    Expenditures for capital assets     (301 )   (601 )   (625 )
    Proceeds from disposal of assets     30     74     101  
    Other investing items, net     (15 )   (69 )   (6 )
    Net cash flows used in investing activities     (286 )   (596 )   (530 )
    Cash flows from financing activities:        
    Repayment of long-term debt             (125 )
    Dividends paid     (227 )   (456 )   (419 )
    Repurchase of Class A common stock     (196 )   (384 )   (324 )
    Other financing items, net     (20 )   (105 )   (61 )
    Net cash flows used in financing activities     (443 )   (945 )   (929 )
    Effect of currency exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents     29     45     (35 )
    Decrease in cash and cash equivalents     (190 )   (277 )   (362 )
    Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period     3,277     3,364     2,646  
    Cash and cash equivalents, end of period   $ 3,087   $ 3,087   $ 2,284  
    Supplemental cash flows disclosures:        
    Income taxes paid, net of refunds   $ 211   $ 418   $ 336  
    Interest paid   $ 98   $ 148   $ 150  


    Supplemental Financial Information

    Supplemental financial information can be found on the Company’s website at: investors.bakerhughes.com in the Financial Information section under Quarterly Results.

    Conference Call and Webcast

    The Company has scheduled an investor conference call to discuss management’s outlook and the results reported in today’s earnings announcement. The call will begin at 9:30 a.m. Eastern time, 8:30 a.m. Central time on Wednesday, July 23, 2025, the content of which is not part of this earnings release. The conference call will be broadcast live via a webcast and can be accessed by visiting the Events and Presentations page on the Company’s website at: investors.bakerhughes.com. An archived version of the webcast will be available on the website for one month following the webcast.

    Forward-Looking Statements

    This news release (and oral statements made regarding the subjects of this release) may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (each a “forward-looking statement”). Forward-looking statements concern future circumstances and results and other statements that are not historical facts and are sometimes identified by the words “may,” “will,” “should,” “potential,” “intend,” “expect,” “would,” “seek,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “overestimate,” “underestimate,” “believe,” “could,” “project,” “predict,” “continue,” “target,” “goal” or other similar words or expressions. There are many risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from our forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are also affected by the risk factors described in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31, 2024 and those set forth from time to time in other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The documents are available through the Company’s website at: www.investors.bakerhughes.com or through the SEC’s Electronic Data Gathering and Analysis Retrieval system at: www.sec.gov. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement, except as required by law. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any of these forward-looking statements.

    Our expectations regarding our business outlook and business plans; the business plans of our customers; oil and natural gas market conditions; cost and availability of resources; economic, legal and regulatory conditions, and other matters are only our forecasts regarding these matters.

    These forward-looking statements, including forecasts, may be substantially different from actual results, which are affected by many risks, along with the following risk factors and the timing of any of these risk factors:

    • Economic and political conditions – the impact of worldwide economic conditions and rising inflation; the impact of tariffs and the potential for significant increases thereto; the impact of global trade policy and the potential for significant changes thereto; the effect that declines in credit availability may have on worldwide economic growth and demand for hydrocarbons; foreign currency exchange fluctuations and changes in the capital markets in locations where we operate; and the impact of government disruptions and sanctions.
    • Orders and RPO – our ability to execute on orders and RPO in accordance with agreed specifications, terms and conditions and convert those orders and RPO to revenue and cash.
    • Oil and gas market conditions – the level of petroleum industry exploration, development and production expenditures; the price of, volatility in pricing of, and the demand for crude oil and natural gas; drilling activity; drilling permits for and regulation of the shelf and the deepwater drilling; excess productive capacity; crude and product inventories; liquefied natural gas supply and demand; seasonal and other adverse weather conditions that affect the demand for energy; severe weather conditions, such as tornadoes and hurricanes, that affect exploration and production activities; Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (“OPEC”) policy and the adherence by OPEC nations to their OPEC production quotas.
    • Terrorism and geopolitical risks – war, military action, terrorist activities or extended periods of international conflict, particularly involving any petroleum-producing or consuming regions, including Russia and Ukraine; and the recent conflict in the Middle East; labor disruptions, civil unrest or security conditions where we operate; potentially burdensome taxation, expropriation of assets by governmental action; cybersecurity risks and cyber incidents or attacks; epidemic outbreaks.

    About Baker Hughes:

    Baker Hughes (Nasdaq: BKR) is an energy technology company that provides solutions to energy and industrial customers worldwide. Built on a century of experience and conducting business in over 120 countries, our innovative technologies and services are taking energy forward – making it safer, cleaner and more efficient for people and the planet. Visit us at bakerhughes.com.

    For more information, please contact:

    Investor Relations

    Chase Mulvehill
    +1 346-297-2561
    investor.relations@bakerhughes.com

    Media Relations

    Adrienne M. Lynch
    +1 713-906-8407
    adrienne.lynch@bakerhughes.com

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI: Baker Hughes Company Announces Second-Quarter 2025 Results

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Second-quarter highlights

    • Orders of $7.0 billion, including $3.5 billion of IET orders.
    • RPO of $34.0 billion, including record IET RPO of $31.3 billion.
    • Revenue of $6.9 billion, down 3% year-over-year.
    • Attributable net income of $701 million.
    • GAAP diluted EPS of $0.71 and adjusted diluted EPS* of $0.63.
    • Adjusted EBITDA* of $1,212 million, up 7% year-over-year.
    • Cash flows from operating activities of $510 million and free cash flow* of $239 million.
    • Returns to shareholders of $423 million, including $196 million of share repurchases.

    HOUSTON and LONDON, July 22, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Baker Hughes Company (Nasdaq: BKR) (“Baker Hughes” or the “Company”) announced results today for the second quarter of 2025.

    “We delivered strong second-quarter results, with total adjusted EBITDA margins increasing 170 basis points year-over-year to 17.5% despite a modest decline in revenue. This performance reflects the benefits of structural cost improvements and continued deployment of our business system, which is driving higher productivity, stronger operating leverage and more durable earnings across the company,” said Lorenzo Simonelli, Baker Hughes Chairman and Chief Executive Officer.

    “IET orders totaled $3.5 billion in the quarter, resulting in another record backlog for the segment. Importantly, order momentum remained strong, supported by more than $550 million of data center related orders, despite the absence of large LNG awards. Following a strong first half and a positive outlook for second half awards, we are confident of achieving the full-year order guidance range for IET.”

    “We remain confident in our ability to deliver solid performance in 2025, with continued growth in IET helping to offset softness in more market-sensitive areas of OFSE – underscoring the strength of our portfolio and the benefits of our strategic diversification. Accordingly, we are raising our full-year revenue and EBITDA guidance for IET and reestablishing full-year guidance for OFSE.”

    “During the quarter, we also announced three strategic transactions to advance our portfolio optimization strategy, reinforcing efforts to enhance the durability of earnings and cash flow while creating long-term value for shareholders. These actions are designed to unlock value from non-core businesses in our portfolio and redeploy that capital into higher-margin opportunities that fit our financial and strategic frameworks.”

    “We are progressing with our strategy of positioning the company for sustainable, differentiated growth and commend the focus and dedication of our people in executing this strategy,” concluded Simonelli.

    * Non-GAAP measure. See reconciliations in the section titled “Reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP Financial Measures.”

        Three Months Ended   Variance
    (in millions except per share amounts)   June 30, 2025 March 31, 2025 June 30, 2024   Sequential Year-over-year
    Orders   $ 7,032   $ 6,459   $ 7,526     9 % (7 %)
    Revenue     6,910     6,427     7,139     8 % (3 %)
    Net income attributable to Baker Hughes     701     402     579     74 % 21 %
    Adjusted net income attributable to Baker Hughes*     623     509     568     22 % 10 %
    Adjusted EBITDA*     1,212     1,037     1,130     17 % 7 %
    Diluted earnings per share (EPS)     0.71     0.40     0.58     76 % 22 %
    Adjusted diluted EPS*     0.63     0.51     0.57     23 % 11 %
    Cash flow from operating activities     510     709     348     (28 %) 47 %
    Free cash flow*     239     454     106     (47 %) F


    * Non-GAAP measure. See reconciliations in the section titled “Reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP Financial Measures.”

    Certain columns and rows in our tables and financial statements may not sum up due to the use of rounded numbers.

    “F” is used in most instances when variance is above 100%. Additionally, “U” is used when variance is below (100)%.

    Quarter Highlights

    Executing our portfolio optimization strategy

    In the second quarter, Baker Hughes announced three strategic transactions, all of which reflect a disciplined capital allocation framework and a focus on core businesses with strong return potential.

    First, the Company signed an agreement to form a joint venture with a subsidiary of Cactus, Inc., contributing the Oilfield Services & Equipment’s (OFSE) Surface Pressure Control (SPC) product line in exchange for approximately $345 million while maintaining a minority ownership stake.

    Second, the Company announced an agreement to sell the Precision Sensors & Instrumentation (PSI) product line within Industrial & Energy Technology (IET) to Crane Company for approximately $1.15 billion. These proceeds will enhance the Company’s flexibility to reinvest in higher-growth, higher-return areas that support further margin expansion and improved returns.

    Finally, Baker Hughes agreed to acquire Continental Disc Corporation (CDC), a leading provider of pressure management solutions, for approximately $540 million. The CDC acquisition strengthens the IET Industrial Products portfolio with a highly complementary, margin-accretive business that expands the Company’s position in the flow and pressure control market and enhances recurring, lifecycle driven revenue.

    Key awards and technology achievements

    The Company continued to support the development of critical data center projects, with year-to-date data center awards of more than $650 million. IET received an award to supply 30 NovaLT™ turbines, representing our largest data center award to-date. The turbines, alongside other associated Baker Hughes equipment, will deliver up to 500 megawatts (MW) of reliable and efficient power for data center development across various U.S. locations.

    Frontier Infrastructure awarded a contract for NovaLT™ turbines, delivering up to 270 MW of power for its data center projects in Wyoming and Texas. This follows the March 2025 enterprise-wide agreement to accelerate large scale carbon capture and storage (CCS) and power solutions.

    Baker Hughes continues to grow the pipeline of future data center opportunities. At the Saudi-U.S. Investment Forum in May, the Company signed an MoU with DataVolt that plans to power data centers globally, including the NEOM project in the Kingdom that intends to utilize Baker Hughes’ multi-fuel NovaLT™ technology solution.

    In addition to growing demand from data center applications, IET experienced increased demand for NovaLT™ turbines in the gas infrastructure sector. During the second quarter, the segment secured an award for four gas turbines to support Aramco’s Master Gas System III pipeline project. Including this award, we have secured a total of $2.9 billion in gas infrastructure equipment orders over the past six quarters.

    Highlighting the durability of IET’s lifecycle model, the segment was awarded several aftermarket services contracts. In Gas Technology Services (GTS), the Company secured more than $350 million of Contractual Services Agreements (CSA) during the quarter. We signed a maintenance agreement with Belayim Petroleum Company (“Petrobel”) to improve uptime and reliability of critical turbomachinery equipment in Egypt. Also in GTS, we renewed a multi-year service agreement with Oman LNG, including resident engineering support along with digital remote monitoring and diagnostics services delivered through iCenter™.

    The Company gained further traction with New Energy globally, with year-to-date bookings now totaling $1.25 billion. In Climate Technology Solutions (CTS), we secured one of our largest CCS orders to-date, providing compression technology for a CCS hub in the Middle East. Also in CTS, we signed a framework agreement with Energinet in Denmark to supply 16 reciprocating compressor packages, supporting an increase in biogas production while driving methane and CO2 emissions reduction for gas infrastructure across the country.

    Industrial Technology continued to demonstrate strong momentum across multiple end markets. In Industrial Solutions, we secured a variety of awards for our Cordant™ suite of solutions. This includes an award from a large NOC to deploy Asset Performance Management across several compression stations in the Middle East, and an award from NOVA Chemicals to optimize maintenance spend and maximize production.

    OFSE maintained strong momentum in Mature Assets Solutions around the globe. In Angola, OFSE was awarded multi-year production solutions contracts for chemicals, artificial lift, and digital services to support a major operator’s offshore activities. In Kazakhstan, the TOPAN and Baker Hughes joint venture secured a critical production chemicals and services award. In Norway, Equinor awarded OFSE a contract to industrialize offshore plug and abandonment (P&A) operations in the Oseberg East field, which followed the announcement of a multi-year P&A framework agreement for integrated well services.

    OFSE saw continued adoption of Leucipa™ automated field production solution, securing an award from Repsol for next-generation AI capabilities following the MoU signed in October 2024. The Company also signed an agreement with ENI to deploy Leucipa for electric submersible pumps (ESP) optimization and AI-powered predictive failure analytics in the Middle East.

    Also in the Middle East, Baker Hughes signed a master services agreement with Aramco for installation and maintenance of ESPs across the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

    In North America, OFSE secured a multi-year contract to provide drag reducing chemicals to be deployed on Genesis Energy’s Cameron Highway Oil Pipeline and Poseidon systems, each of which is operated and 64% owned by Genesis Energy. To support this agreement, OFSE will expand its chemicals manufacturing footprint and deploy Leucipa. Additionally, bp awarded OFSE a multi-year chemicals management services contract to optimize throughput and asset reliability in the U.S. Gulf Coast.

    In Germany, OFSE successfully drilled Lower Saxony’s first productive deep geothermal exploration well, a project that leverages OFSE’s integrated well construction and production capabilities and the Company’s industry-leading subsurface-to-surface digital solutions to monitor and optimize operational performance.

    Consolidated Financial Results

    Revenue for the quarter was $6,910 million, an increase of 8% sequentially and down $229 million year-over-year. The decrease in revenue year-over-year was driven by a decrease in OFSE partially offset by an increase in IET.

    The Company’s total book-to-bill ratio in the second quarter of 2025 was 1.0; the IET book-to-bill ratio was 1.1.

    Net income as determined in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for the second quarter of 2025 was $701 million. Net income increased $299 million sequentially and increased $122 million year-over-year.

    Adjusted net income (a non-GAAP financial measure) for the second quarter of 2025 was $623 million, which excludes adjustments totaling $78 million. A list of the adjusting items and associated reconciliation from GAAP has been provided in Table 1b in the section titled “Reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP Financial Measures.” Adjusted net income for the second quarter of 2025 was up 22% sequentially and up 10% year-over-year.

    Depreciation and amortization for the second quarter of 2025 was $293 million.

    Adjusted EBITDA (a non-GAAP financial measure) for the second quarter of 2025 was $1,212 million, which excludes adjustments totaling $102 million. See Table 1a in the section titled “Reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP Financial Measures.” Adjusted EBITDA for the second quarter was up 17% sequentially and up 7% year-over-year.

    The sequential increase in adjusted net income and adjusted EBITDA was primarily driven by an increase in volume, favorable FX, and overall productivity. The year-over-year increase in adjusted net income and adjusted EBITDA was driven by productivity and structural cost out initiatives, favorable FX, partially offset by lower volume in OFSE, and cost inflation in both segments.

    Other Financial Items

    Remaining Performance Obligations (“RPO”) in the second quarter of 2025 ended at $34 billion, an increase of $0.8 billion from the first quarter of 2025. OFSE RPO was $2.7 billion, down 3% sequentially, while IET RPO was $31.3 billion, up 3% sequentially. Within IET RPO, GTE RPO was $11.3 billion, and GTS RPO was $15.6 billion.

    Income tax expense in the second quarter of 2025 was $256 million.

    Other (income) expense, net in the second quarter of 2025 was $(134) million, primarily related to changes in fair value for equity securities of $(119) million.

    GAAP diluted earnings per share was $0.71. Adjusted diluted earnings per share (a non-GAAP financial measure) was $0.63. Excluded from adjusted diluted earnings per share were all items listed in Table 1b in the section titled “Reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP Financial Measures.”

    Cash flow from operating activities was $510 million for the second quarter of 2025. Free cash flow (a non-GAAP financial measure) for the quarter was $239 million. A reconciliation from GAAP has been provided in Table 1c in the section titled “Reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP Financial Measures.”

    Capital expenditures, net of proceeds from disposal of assets, were $271 million for the second quarter of 2025, of which $184 million was for OFSE and $68 million was for IET.

    Results by Reporting Segment

    The following segment discussions and variance explanations are intended to reflect management’s view of the relevant comparisons of financial results on a sequential or year-over-year basis, depending on the business dynamics of the reporting segments.

    Oilfield Services & Equipment

    (in millions)   Three Months Ended   Variance
    Segment results   June 30, 2025 March 31, 2025 June 30, 2024   Sequential Year-over-year
    Orders   $ 3,503   $ 3,281   $ 4,068     7 % (14 %)
    Revenue   $ 3,617   $ 3,499   $ 4,011     3 % (10 %)
    EBITDA   $ 677   $ 623   $ 716     9 % (5 %)
    EBITDA margin     18.7 %   17.8 %   17.8 %   0.9pts 0.9pts
    (in millions)   Three Months Ended   Variance
    Revenue by Product Line   June 30, 2025 March 31, 2025 June 30, 2024   Sequential Year-over-year
    Well Construction   $ 921   $ 892   $ 1,090     3 % (16 %)
    Completions, Intervention, and Measurements     935     925     1,118     1 % (16 %)
    Production Solutions     968     899     958     8 % 1 %
    Subsea & Surface Pressure Systems     793     782     845     1 % (6 %)
    Total Revenue   $ 3,617   $ 3,499   $ 4,011     3 % (10 %)
    (in millions)   Three Months Ended   Variance
    Revenue by Geographic Region   June 30, 2025 March 31, 2025 June 30, 2024   Sequential Year-over-year
    North America   $ 928   $ 922   $ 1,023     1 % (9 %)
    Latin America     639     568     663     12 % (4 %)
    Europe/CIS/Sub-Saharan Africa     653     580     827     13 % (21 %)
    Middle East/Asia     1,398     1,429     1,498     (2 %) (7 %)
    Total Revenue   $ 3,617   $ 3,499   $ 4,011     3 % (10 %)
                   
    North America   $ 928   $ 922   $ 1,023     1 % (9 %)
    International   $ 2,689   $ 2,577   $ 2,988     4 % (10 %)


    EBITDA excludes depreciation and amortization of
    $233 million, $226 million, and $223 million for the three months ended June 30, 2025, March 31, 2025, and June 30, 2024, respectively. EBITDA margin is defined as EBITDA divided by revenue.

    OFSE orders of $3,503 million for the second quarter of 2025 increased by 7% sequentially. Subsea and Surface Pressure Systems orders were $698 million, up 31% sequentially, and down 21% year-over-year.

    OFSE revenue of $3,617 million for the second quarter of 2025 was up 3% sequentially, and down 10% year-over-year.

    North America revenue was $928 million, up 1% sequentially. International revenue was $2,689 million, up 4% sequentially, with increase in all regions with the exception of Middle East and Asia.

    Segment EBITDA for the second quarter of 2025 was $677 million, an increase of $54 million, or 9% sequentially. The sequential increase in EBITDA was primarily driven by productivity, structural cost-out initiatives, volume increase, partially offset by inflation and revenue mix.

    Industrial & Energy Technology

    (in millions)   Three Months Ended   Variance
    Segment results   June 30, 2025 March 31, 2025 June 30, 2024   Sequential Year-over-year
    Orders   $ 3,530   $ 3,178   $ 3,458     11 % 2 %
    Revenue   $ 3,293   $ 2,928   $ 3,128     12 % 5 %
    EBITDA   $ 585   $ 501   $ 497     17 % 18 %
    EBITDA margin     17.8 %   17.1 %   15.9 %   0.7pts 1.9pts
    (in millions)   Three Months Ended   Variance
    Orders by Product Line   June 30, 2025 March 31, 2025 June 30, 2024   Sequential Year-over-year
    Gas Technology Equipment   $ 781   $ 1,335   $ 1,493     (42 %) (48 %)
    Gas Technology Services     986     913     769     8 % 28 %
    Total Gas Technology     1,767     2,248     2,261     (21 %) (22 %)
    Industrial Products     513     501     524     2 % (2 %)
    Industrial Solutions     327     281     281     16 % 16 %
    Total Industrial Technology     839     782     805     7 % 4 %
    Climate Technology Solutions     923     148     392     F F
    Total Orders   $ 3,530   $ 3,178   $ 3,458     11 % 2 %
    (in millions)   Three Months Ended   Variance
    Revenue by Product Line   June 30, 2025 March 31, 2025 June 30, 2024   Sequential Year-over-year
    Gas Technology Equipment   $ 1,624   $ 1,456   $ 1,539     12 % 6 %
    Gas Technology Services     752     592     691     27 % 9 %
    Total Gas Technology     2,377     2,047     2,230     16 % 7 %
    Industrial Products     488     445     509     10 % (4 %)
    Industrial Solutions     273     258     262     6 % 4 %
    Total Industrial Technology     761     703     770     8 % (1 %)
    Climate Technology Solutions     156     178     128     (12 %) 22 %
    Total Revenue   $ 3,293   $ 2,928   $ 3,128     12 % 5 %


    EBITDA excludes depreciation and amortization of
    $56 million, $53 million, and $55 million for the three months ended June 30, 2025, March 31, 2025, and June 30, 2024, respectively. EBITDA margin is defined as EBITDA divided by revenue.

    “F” is used in most instances when variance is above 100%. Additionally, “U” is used when variance is below (100)%.

    IET orders of $3,530 million for the second quarter of 2025 increased by $72 million, or 2% year-over-year. The increase was driven primarily by Climate Technology Solutions and partially offset by Gas Technology.

    IET revenue of $3,293 million for the second quarter of 2025 increased $165 million, or 5% year-over-year. The increase was driven by Gas Technology Equipment, up $85 million or 6% year-over-year, Gas Technology Services, up $61 million or 9% year-over-year, and Climate Technology Solutions, up $28 million or 22% year-over-year.

    Segment EBITDA for the quarter was $585 million, an increase of $88 million, or 18% year-over-year. The year-over-year increase in segment EBITDA was driven by positive pricing, favorable FX, and productivity, partially offset by cost inflation.

    Reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP Financial Measures

    Management provides non-GAAP financial measures because it believes such measures are widely accepted financial indicators used by investors and analysts to analyze and compare companies on the basis of operating performance (including adjusted EBITDA; adjusted net income attributable to Baker Hughes; and adjusted diluted earnings per share) and liquidity (free cash flow) and that these measures may be used by investors to make informed investment decisions. Management believes that the exclusion of certain identified items from several key operating performance measures enables us to evaluate our operations more effectively, to identify underlying trends in the business, and to establish operational goals for certain management compensation purposes. Management also believes that free cash flow is an important supplemental measure of our cash performance but should not be considered as a measure of residual cash flow available for discretionary purposes, or as an alternative to cash flow from operating activities presented in accordance with GAAP.

    Table 1a. Reconciliation of Net Income Attributable to Baker Hughes to Adjusted EBITDA and Segment EBITDA

        Three Months Ended
    (in millions)   June 30, 2025 March 31, 2025 June 30, 2024
    Net income attributable to Baker Hughes (GAAP)   $ 701   $ 402   $ 579  
    Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests     10     7     2  
    Provision for income taxes     256     152     243  
    Interest expense, net     54     51     47  
    Depreciation & amortization     293     285     283  
    Change in fair value of equity securities (1)     (119 )   140     (19 )
    Other charges and credits (1)     17         (6 )
    Adjusted EBITDA (non-GAAP)     1,212     1,037     1,130  
    Corporate costs     78     85     83  
    Other (income) / expense not allocated to segments     (28 )   1      
    Total Segment EBITDA (non-GAAP)   $ 1,262   $ 1,124   $ 1,213  
    OFSE     677     623     716  
    IET     585     501     497  


    (1) 
    Change in fair value of equity securities and other charges and credits are reported in “Other (income) expense, net” on the condensed consolidated statements of income (loss).

    Table 1a reconciles net income attributable to Baker Hughes, which is the directly comparable financial result determined in accordance with GAAP, to adjusted EBITDA and Segment EBITDA. Adjusted EBITDA and Segment EBITDA exclude the impact of certain identified items.

    Table 1b. Reconciliation of Net Income Attributable to Baker Hughes to Adjusted Net Income Attributable to Baker Hughes

        Three Months Ended
    (in millions, except per share amounts)   June 30, 2025 March 31, 2025 June 30, 2024
    Net income attributable to Baker Hughes (GAAP)   $ 701   $ 402   $ 579  
    Change in fair value of equity securities     (119 )   140     (19 )
    Other adjustments     17         14  
    Tax adjustments(1)     24     (32 )   (6 )
    Total adjustments, net of income tax     (78 )   108     (11 )
    Less: adjustments attributable to noncontrolling interests              
    Adjustments attributable to Baker Hughes     (78 )   108     (11 )
    Adjusted net income attributable to Baker Hughes (non-GAAP)   $ 623   $ 509   $ 568  
             
    Denominator:        
    Weighted-average shares of Class A common stock outstanding diluted     991     999     1,001  
    Adjusted earnings per share – diluted (non-GAAP)   $ 0.63   $ 0.51   $ 0.57  


    (1) 
    All periods reflect the tax associated with the other (income) loss adjustments.

    Table 1b reconciles net income attributable to Baker Hughes, which is the directly comparable financial result determined in accordance with GAAP, to adjusted net income attributable to Baker Hughes. Adjusted net income attributable to Baker Hughes excludes the impact of certain identified items.

    Table 1c. Reconciliation of Net Cash Flows from Operating Activities to Free Cash Flow

        Three Months Ended
    (in millions)   June 30, 2025 March 31, 2025 June 30, 2024
    Net cash flows from operating activities (GAAP)   $ 510   $ 709   $ 348  
    Add: cash used for capital expenditures, net of proceeds from disposal of assets     (271 )   (255 )   (242 )
    Free cash flow (non-GAAP)   $ 239   $ 454   $ 106  

    Table 1c reconciles net cash flows from operating activities, which is the directly comparable financial result determined in accordance with GAAP, to free cash flow. Free cash flow is defined as net cash flows from operating activities less expenditures for capital assets plus proceeds from disposal of assets.


    Financial Tables (GAAP)

    Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss)
    (Unaudited)
     
        Three Months Ended June 30, Six Months Ended June 30,
    (In millions, except per share amounts)     2025     2024     2025     2024  
    Revenue   $ 6,910   $ 7,139   $ 13,337   $ 13,557  
    Costs and expenses:          
    Cost of revenue     5,295     5,493     10,247     10,469  
    Selling, general and administrative     567     643     1,144     1,261  
    Research and development costs     161     158     307     322  
    Other (income) expense, net     (134 )   (26 )   6     (48 )
    Interest expense, net     54     47     105     88  
    Income before income taxes     967     824     1,528     1,465  
    Provision for income taxes     (256 )   (243 )   (408 )   (421 )
    Net income     711     581     1,120     1,044  
    Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests     10     2     17     10  
    Net income attributable to Baker Hughes Company   $ 701   $ 579   $ 1,103   $ 1,034  
               
    Per share amounts:      
    Basic income per Class A common stock   $ 0.71   $ 0.58   $ 1.11   $ 1.04  
    Diluted income per Class A common stock   $ 0.71   $ 0.58   $ 1.11   $ 1.03  
               
    Weighted average shares:          
    Class A basic     988     996     990     997  
    Class A diluted     991     1,001     995     1,002  
               
    Cash dividend per Class A common stock   $ 0.23   $ 0.21   $ 0.46   $ 0.42  
    Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Position
    (Unaudited)
     
    (In millions)   June 30, 2025 December 31, 2024
    ASSETS
    Current Assets:      
    Cash and cash equivalents   $ 3,087   $ 3,364  
    Current receivables, net     6,511     7,122  
    Inventories, net     5,105     4,954  
    All other current assets     2,915     1,771  
    Total current assets     17,618     17,211  
    Property, plant and equipment, less accumulated depreciation     5,176     5,127  
    Goodwill     5,801     6,078  
    Other intangible assets, net     3,919     3,951  
    Contract and other deferred assets     1,841     1,730  
    All other assets     4,385     4,266  
    Total assets   $ 38,740   $ 38,363  
    LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
    Current Liabilities:      
    Accounts payable   $ 4,340   $ 4,542  
    Short-term debt     66     53  
    Progress collections and deferred income     5,680     5,672  
    All other current liabilities     2,429     2,724  
    Total current liabilities     12,515     12,991  
    Long-term debt     5,968     5,970  
    Liabilities for pensions and other postretirement benefits     997     988  
    All other liabilities     1,392     1,359  
    Equity     17,868     17,055  
    Total liabilities and equity   $ 38,740   $ 38,363  
           
    Outstanding Baker Hughes Company shares:      
    Class A common stock     985     990  
    Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
    (Unaudited)
     
        Three Months Ended June 30, Six Months Ended June 30,
    (In millions)     2025     2025     2024  
    Cash flows from operating activities:        
    Net income   $ 711   $ 1,120   $ 1,044  
    Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flows from operating activities:        
    Depreciation and amortization     293     579     566  
    Stock-based compensation cost     52     102     101  
    Change in fair value of equity securities     (119 )   21     (71 )
    (Benefit) provision for deferred income taxes     36     (17 )   33  
    Working capital     (120 )   98     (36 )
    Other operating items, net     (343 )   (684 )   (505 )
    Net cash flows provided by operating activities     510     1,219     1,132  
    Cash flows from investing activities:        
    Expenditures for capital assets     (301 )   (601 )   (625 )
    Proceeds from disposal of assets     30     74     101  
    Other investing items, net     (15 )   (69 )   (6 )
    Net cash flows used in investing activities     (286 )   (596 )   (530 )
    Cash flows from financing activities:        
    Repayment of long-term debt             (125 )
    Dividends paid     (227 )   (456 )   (419 )
    Repurchase of Class A common stock     (196 )   (384 )   (324 )
    Other financing items, net     (20 )   (105 )   (61 )
    Net cash flows used in financing activities     (443 )   (945 )   (929 )
    Effect of currency exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents     29     45     (35 )
    Decrease in cash and cash equivalents     (190 )   (277 )   (362 )
    Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period     3,277     3,364     2,646  
    Cash and cash equivalents, end of period   $ 3,087   $ 3,087   $ 2,284  
    Supplemental cash flows disclosures:        
    Income taxes paid, net of refunds   $ 211   $ 418   $ 336  
    Interest paid   $ 98   $ 148   $ 150  


    Supplemental Financial Information

    Supplemental financial information can be found on the Company’s website at: investors.bakerhughes.com in the Financial Information section under Quarterly Results.

    Conference Call and Webcast

    The Company has scheduled an investor conference call to discuss management’s outlook and the results reported in today’s earnings announcement. The call will begin at 9:30 a.m. Eastern time, 8:30 a.m. Central time on Wednesday, July 23, 2025, the content of which is not part of this earnings release. The conference call will be broadcast live via a webcast and can be accessed by visiting the Events and Presentations page on the Company’s website at: investors.bakerhughes.com. An archived version of the webcast will be available on the website for one month following the webcast.

    Forward-Looking Statements

    This news release (and oral statements made regarding the subjects of this release) may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (each a “forward-looking statement”). Forward-looking statements concern future circumstances and results and other statements that are not historical facts and are sometimes identified by the words “may,” “will,” “should,” “potential,” “intend,” “expect,” “would,” “seek,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “overestimate,” “underestimate,” “believe,” “could,” “project,” “predict,” “continue,” “target,” “goal” or other similar words or expressions. There are many risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from our forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are also affected by the risk factors described in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31, 2024 and those set forth from time to time in other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The documents are available through the Company’s website at: www.investors.bakerhughes.com or through the SEC’s Electronic Data Gathering and Analysis Retrieval system at: www.sec.gov. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement, except as required by law. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any of these forward-looking statements.

    Our expectations regarding our business outlook and business plans; the business plans of our customers; oil and natural gas market conditions; cost and availability of resources; economic, legal and regulatory conditions, and other matters are only our forecasts regarding these matters.

    These forward-looking statements, including forecasts, may be substantially different from actual results, which are affected by many risks, along with the following risk factors and the timing of any of these risk factors:

    • Economic and political conditions – the impact of worldwide economic conditions and rising inflation; the impact of tariffs and the potential for significant increases thereto; the impact of global trade policy and the potential for significant changes thereto; the effect that declines in credit availability may have on worldwide economic growth and demand for hydrocarbons; foreign currency exchange fluctuations and changes in the capital markets in locations where we operate; and the impact of government disruptions and sanctions.
    • Orders and RPO – our ability to execute on orders and RPO in accordance with agreed specifications, terms and conditions and convert those orders and RPO to revenue and cash.
    • Oil and gas market conditions – the level of petroleum industry exploration, development and production expenditures; the price of, volatility in pricing of, and the demand for crude oil and natural gas; drilling activity; drilling permits for and regulation of the shelf and the deepwater drilling; excess productive capacity; crude and product inventories; liquefied natural gas supply and demand; seasonal and other adverse weather conditions that affect the demand for energy; severe weather conditions, such as tornadoes and hurricanes, that affect exploration and production activities; Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (“OPEC”) policy and the adherence by OPEC nations to their OPEC production quotas.
    • Terrorism and geopolitical risks – war, military action, terrorist activities or extended periods of international conflict, particularly involving any petroleum-producing or consuming regions, including Russia and Ukraine; and the recent conflict in the Middle East; labor disruptions, civil unrest or security conditions where we operate; potentially burdensome taxation, expropriation of assets by governmental action; cybersecurity risks and cyber incidents or attacks; epidemic outbreaks.

    About Baker Hughes:

    Baker Hughes (Nasdaq: BKR) is an energy technology company that provides solutions to energy and industrial customers worldwide. Built on a century of experience and conducting business in over 120 countries, our innovative technologies and services are taking energy forward – making it safer, cleaner and more efficient for people and the planet. Visit us at bakerhughes.com.

    For more information, please contact:

    Investor Relations

    Chase Mulvehill
    +1 346-297-2561
    investor.relations@bakerhughes.com

    Media Relations

    Adrienne M. Lynch
    +1 713-906-8407
    adrienne.lynch@bakerhughes.com

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI: Weatherford Announces Second Quarter 2025 Results

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    • Second quarter revenue of $1,204 million increased 1% sequentially
    • Second quarter operating income of $237 million increased 67% sequentially
    • Second quarter net income of $136 million increased 79% sequentially; net income margin of 11.3%
    • Second quarter adjusted EBITDA* of $254 million was flat sequentially; adjusted EBITDA margin* of 21.1% decreased 11 basis points sequentially
    • Second quarter cash provided by operating activities of $128 million and adjusted free cash flow* of $79 million
    • Repurchased $27 million of 8.625% Senior Notes due 2030 in the second quarter of 2025
    • Shareholder return of $52 million for the quarter, which included dividend payments of $18 million and share repurchases of $34 million
    • Board approved quarterly cash dividend of $0.25 per share, payable on September 4, 2025, to shareholders of record as of August 6, 2025
    • Signed an agreement with Amazon Web Services to migrate and modernize our digital platforms, including the Modern Edge Platform and Unified Data Model, enhancing operational efficiency and data-driven decision-making. The collaboration also boosts Weatherford’s Software Launchpad, offering scalable, cloud-based solutions while ensuring data control and integration flexibility

    *Non-GAAP – refer to the section titled Non-GAAP Financial Measures Defined and GAAP to Non-GAAP Financial Measures Reconciled

    HOUSTON, July 22, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Weatherford International plc (NASDAQ: WFRD) (“Weatherford” or the “Company”) announced today its results for the second quarter of 2025.

    Revenues for the second quarter of 2025 were $1,204 million, an increase of 1% sequentially and a decrease of 14% year-over-year. Operating income in the second quarter of 2025 was $237 million, an increase of 67% sequentially and a decrease of 10% year-over-year. Net income in the second quarter of 2025 was $136 million, with a 11.3% margin, an increase of 79%, or 493 basis points, sequentially, and an increase of 9%, or 240 basis points, year-over-year. Adjusted EBITDA* was $254 million, with a 21.1% margin, flat, or a decrease of 11 basis points, sequentially, and a decrease of 30%, or 488 basis points, year-over-year. Basic income per share in the second quarter of 2025 was $1.87, an increase of 81% sequentially and an increase of 10% year-over-year. Diluted income per share in the second quarter of 2025 was $1.87, an increase of 81% sequentially and an increase of 13% year-over-year.

    Second quarter 2025 cash flows provided by operating activities were $128 million, a decrease of 10% sequentially and a decrease of 15% year-over-year. Adjusted free cash flow* was $79 million, an increase of 20% sequentially and a decrease of 18% year-over-year. Capital expenditures were $54 million in the second quarter of 2025, a decrease of 30% sequentially and a decrease of 13% year-over-year.

    Girish Saligram, President and Chief Executive Officer, commented, “Our core operating markets continued to exhibit activity slowdown during the quarter, driven by geopolitical events, supply-demand imbalance concerns, and trade uncertainties. Despite these structural headwinds, the One Weatherford team delivered second-quarter results in line with expectations, reflecting disciplined execution and operational efficiency in a distinctly softer market. The sequential performance demonstrates strong fundamentals and the resilience of our operating model. Revenues increased and adjusted EBITDA was flat despite the previously announced divestiture of certain businesses in Argentina. Adjusted Free Cash Flow also increased, even as receivables continued to build in Latin America due to lack of payments in Mexico. This performance underscores the strength of the new Weatherford operating paradigm and marks a positive departure from past responses to prior market cycle inflections.

    Looking ahead, activity levels in both North America and international markets continue to show signs of sluggishness, and expectations for a broader sector recovery have shifted further to the right. While we anticipate a relatively flat trajectory on revenues for the immediate future, we remain focused on driving adjusted free cash flow conversion through portfolio optimization, structural cost efficiencies, optimization of working capital, and CAPEX efficiency.”

    *Non-GAAP – refer to the section titled Non-GAAP Financial Measures Defined and GAAP to Non-GAAP Financial Measures Reconciled

    Operational & Commercial Highlights

    • An International Oil Company (IOC) awarded Weatherford a three-year contract to provide Managed Pressure Drilling (MPD) services for a deepwater development project in Mexico.
    • Aramco awarded Weatherford a one-year contract extension to provide MPD services for its onshore and offshore wells.
    • Weatherford, with Superior Energy Services, secured a three-year contract to supply conventional completions (Upper and Lower) equipment to Petrobras for pre-salt and post-salt fields offshore Brazil.
    • Cairn Oil & Gas granted Weatherford a Letter of Award to provide Completions, Liner Hanger, Whipstock systems and services, and MPD services for High Temperature – Ultra High Temperature (HT-UHT) drilling and rigless project in Barmer, India.
    • bp UK awarded Weatherford a one-year contract to provide Cementation Products, Completions, Drilling Services, Intervention Services & Drilling Tools (ISDT), and a one-year contract to provide Liner Hanger systems for the Northern Endurance Partnership CO2 Storage Project in offshore UK.
    • Beach Energy Limited awarded Weatherford contracts to provide Cementation Products, Cement Heads, Liner Hangers, and Tubular Running Services (TRS) for a campaign in offshore Australia.
    • Origin Energy awarded Weatherford a five-year contract to re-supply PCP systems in onshore Australia.
    • OMV awarded Weatherford a three-year contract to supply Completions and Reservoir Monitoring equipment in Tunisia.
    • Shell awarded Weatherford a three-year contract to provide ISDT offshore in the Gulf of America.
    • An IOC awarded Weatherford a three-year contract to provide thru-tubing Well Services in offshore Malaysia.
    • Kuwait Oil Company (KOC) awarded Weatherford a contract for the supply of XpressTM XT Liner Hanger systems for deep drilling operations in Kuwait.
    • A National Oil Company in the Middle East awarded a two-year contract to provide thru-tubing and safety valve systems in the United Arab Emirates.
    • A major operator in Canada awarded Weatherford a two-year contract to provide Artificial Lift services in onshore Canada.
    • Weatherford, in strategic partnership with Constellation, secured a three-year contract to deliver TRS, integrating the automated Vero™ technology into their rig for Petrobras in offshore Brazil.

    Technology Highlights

    • Drilling & Evaluation (“DRE”)
      • In Kuwait, Weatherford successfully deployed combined Magnus™ and Victus™ solutions for a pilot project for KOC. This approach enabled the use of a smaller wellhead, eliminated one casing string, and allowed effective drilling and cementing through stacked reservoirs, potentially unlocking new completion designs and enhancing recovery.
      • In Qatar, Weatherford successfully completed the first Modus™ job using MPD techniques that significantly improved operational efficiency and well safety. The Modus system enabled the operator to reach the targeted total depth while saving substantial rig time and costs compared to conventional methods.
      • In Norway, Weatherford successfully completed three open hole logging jobs for an international operator using coiled tubing for deployment. This approach enabled effective logging in a highly deviated well, overcoming the limitations of conventional wireline conveyance.
    • Well Construction and Completions (“WCC”)
      • In the Gulf of America, Weatherford successfully integrated multiple TRS technologies for bp. This integration enhanced operational speed, cost-effectiveness, and well integrity while improving quality, efficiency, and safety by reducing personnel requirements and eliminating manual intervention.
      • In the United Kingdom, Weatherford successfully implemented StringGuardTM for Shell. The solution is designed to provide protection against potential dropped string events, with the aim of maintaining operational focus and incident free delivery.
    • Production and Intervention (“PRI”)
      • Weatherford’s Rotaflex® Artificial Lift technology has witnessed continued global adoption, with recent installations in France, Australia, and Oman. These projects have addressed a variety of operational challenges, including the replacement of Electric Submersible Pumps and conventional pumping units, enhancement of production efficiency, support for Coal Bed Methane initiatives, and restoration of output in complex wells, underscoring the versatility and effectiveness of the Rotaflex technology.
      • In Norway, Weatherford completed a successful field trial of TITAN RS technology for Equinor, following the acquisition of Ardyne. The trial delivered a full casing cut and recovery solution for the plug and abandonment market, reinforcing Weatherford’s leadership in advanced well abandonment.
      • In Saudi Arabia, Weatherford installed the first Rod Lift system in the Jafurah field. The unit was successfully commissioned, validating Weatherford’s Rod Lift technology as a viable artificial lift solution for this unconventional gas field.

    Shareholder Return

    During the second quarter of 2025, Weatherford paid dividends of $18 million and repurchased shares for approximately $34 million, resulting in a total shareholder return of $52 million. In the first half of the year, Weatherford paid dividends of $36 million and repurchased shares for approximately $87 million, resulting in a total shareholder return of $123 million.

    On July 17, 2025, our Board declared a cash dividend of $0.25 per share of the Company’s ordinary shares, payable on September 4, 2025, to shareholders of record as of August 6, 2025.

    Results by Reportable Segment

    Drilling and Evaluation (“DRE”)
      

        Three Months Ended   Variance
    ($ in Millions)   June 30,
    2025
      March 31,
    2025
      June 30,
    2024
      Seq.   YoY
    Revenue   $          335     $              350     $          427     (4)   %   (22)    %
    Segment Adjusted EBITDA   $            69     $                 74     $          130     (7)   %   (47)    %
    Segment Adj EBITDA Margin     20.6 %     21.1 %     30.4 %            (55) bps         (985) bps

    Second quarter 2025 DRE revenue of $335 million decreased by $15 million, or 4% sequentially, primarily from lower Wireline activity in North America and Latin America partly offset by higher Drilling Services activity in Europe/Sub-Sahara Africa/Russia and Latin America. Year-over-year DRE revenue decreased by $92 million, or 22%, primarily from lower activity across all geographies, especially in Latin America, partly offset by higher Drilling Services activity in Europe/Sub-Sahara Africa/ Russia, North America and Middle East/North Africa/Asia.

    Second quarter 2025 DRE segment adjusted EBITDA of $69 million decreased by $5 million, or 7% sequentially, primarily from lower Wireline activity, partly offset by higher Drilling Services activity. Year-over-year DRE segment adjusted EBITDA decreased by $61 million, or 47%, primarily from lower activity across all geographies, especially in Latin America.

    Well Construction and Completions (“WCC”)  

        Three Months Ended   Variance
    ($ in Millions)   June 30,
    2025
      March 31,
    2025
      June 30,
    2024
      Seq.   YoY
    Revenue   $          456     $              441     $          504     3 %   (10)   %
    Segment Adjusted EBITDA   $          118     $              128     $          145     (8) %   (19)   %
    Segment Adj EBITDA Margin     25.9 %     29.0 %     28.8 %         (315) bps          (289) bps

    Second quarter 2025 WCC revenue of $456 million increased by $15 million, or 3% sequentially, primarily from higher Liner Hangers and Cementation Products activity partly offset by lower Completions activity especially in Latin America.  Year-over-year WCC revenues decreased by $48 million, or 10%, primarily from lower activity in Latin America, Europe/Sub-Sahara Africa/Russia and North America partly offset by higher Liner Hangers activity in Middle East/North Africa/Asia.

    Second quarter 2025 WCC segment adjusted EBITDA of $118 million decreased by $10 million, or 8% sequentially, primarily from lower Completions activity partly offset by higher Liner Hangers activity and Cementation Products activity and fall through. Year-over-year WCC segment adjusted EBITDA decreased by $27 million, or 19%, primarily from lower activity in Latin America, Europe/Sub-Sahara Africa/Russia and North America partly offset by higher Liner Hangers and TRS fall through in Middle East/North Africa/Asia.

    Production and Intervention (“PRI”)  

        Three Months Ended   Variance
    ($ in Millions)   June 30,
    2025
      March 31,
    2025
      June 30,
    2024
      Seq.   YoY
    Revenue   $          327         $              334     $          369     (2)  %   (11)   %
    Segment Adjusted EBITDA   $            63         $                 62     $            85     2 %   (26)   %
    Segment Adj EBITDA Margin     19.3 %     18.6 %     23.0 %             70  bps          (377) bps

    Second quarter 2025 PRI revenue of $327 million  decreased by $7 million, or 2% sequentially, primarily from lower Pressure Pumping activity in Latin America pursuant to the sale of the Argentina Pressure Pumping business partly offset by higher Artificial Lift and Sub-sea Intervention activity. Year-over-year PRI revenue decreased by $42 million, or 11%, as lower activity across all geographies was partly offset by higher Sub-sea intervention activity in Latin America.

    Second quarter 2025 PRI segment adjusted EBITDA of $63 million increased by $1 million, or 2% sequentially, primarily from  higher Sub-sea Intervention activity and fall through partly offset by lower Pressure Pumping activity in Latin America pursuant to the sale of the Argentina Pressure Pumping business. Year-over-year PRI segment adjusted EBITDA decreased by $22 million, or 26%, primarily from lower activity across all geographies, partly offset by higher Sub-sea intervention activity and fall through in Latin America.

    Revenue by Geography 

        Three Months Ended   Variance
    ($ in Millions)   June 30,
    2025
      March 31,
    2025
      June 30,
    2024
      Seq.   YoY
    North America   $             241   $                  250   $             252   (4) %   (4) %
                         
    International   $             963   $                  943   $          1,153   2 %   (16) %
       Latin America                     195                        241                    353   (19) %   (45) %
       Middle East/North Africa/Asia                    524                        503                    542   4 %   (3) %
       Europe/Sub-Sahara Africa/Russia                    244                        199                    258   23 %   (5) %
    Total Revenue   $          1,204   $               1,193   $          1,405   1 %   (14) %


    North America

    Second quarter 2025 North America revenue of $241 million decreased by $9 million, or 4% sequentially, primarily from lower Wireline activity in Canada Land, partly offset by higher Cementation Products and Liner Hangers activity. Year-over-year, North America decreased by $11 million, or 4% , primarily from lower activity across all the segments, partly offset by higher activity in US Offshore.

    International

    Second quarter 2025 international revenue of $963 million increased by $20 million, or 2% sequentially and decreased by $190 million, or 16% year-over-year.

    Second quarter 2025 Latin America revenue of $195 million decreased by $46 million, or 19% sequentially, primarily from lower activity in Argentina pursuant to the sale of the Argentina Pressure Pumping business, partly offset by higher Sub-sea intervention activity. Year-over-year, Latin America revenue decreased by $158 million, or 45%, primarily from lower activity in Mexico and Argentina, partly offset by higher Sub-sea intervention activity.

    Second quarter 2025 Middle East/North Africa/Asia revenue of $524 million increased by $21 million, or 4% sequentially, primarily from higher Liner Hangers and Cementation Products activity partly offset by lower Drilling Services. Year-over-year, the Middle East/North Africa/Asia revenue decreased by $18 million, or 3%, primarily from lower activity in the DRE and PRI segments partly offset by higher Liner Hangers activity.

    Second quarter 2025 Europe/Sub-Sahara Africa/Russia revenue of $244 million increased by $45 million, or 23% sequentially, primarily from higher activity across all the segments. Year-over-year, Europe/Sub-Sahara Africa/Russia revenue decreased by $14 million, or 5%, primarily from lower activity across all the segments especially WCC, partly offset by higher Drilling Services and Pressure Pumping.

    About Weatherford
    Weatherford delivers innovative energy services that integrate proven technologies with advanced digitalization to create sustainable offerings for maximized value and return on investment. Our world-class experts partner with customers to optimize their resources and realize the full potential of their assets. Operators choose us for strategic solutions that add efficiency, flexibility, and responsibility to any energy operation. The Company conducts business in approximately 75 countries and has approximately 17,300 team members representing more than 110 nationalities and 310 operating locations. Visit weatherford.com for more information and connect with us on social media.

    Conference Call Details

    Weatherford will host a conference call on Wednesday, July 23, 2025, to discuss the Company’s results for the second quarter ended June 30, 2025. The conference call will begin at 8:30 a.m. Eastern Time (7:30 a.m. Central Time).

    Listeners are encouraged to download the accompanying presentation slides which will be available in the investor relations section of the Company’s website.

    Listeners can participate in the conference call via a live webcast at https://www.weatherford.com/investor-relations/investor-news-and-events/events/ or by dialing +1 877-328-5344 (within the U.S.) or +1 412-902-6762 (outside of the U.S.) and asking for the Weatherford conference call. Participants should log in or dial in approximately 10 minutes prior to the start of the call.

    A telephonic replay of the conference call will be available until August 6, 2025, at 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time. To access the replay, please dial +1 877-344-7529 (within the U.S.) or +1 412-317-0088 (outside of the U.S.) and reference conference number 1312926. A replay and transcript of the earnings call will also be available in the investor relations section of the Company’s website.

    Contacts
    For Investors:
    Luke Lemoine
    Senior Vice President, Corporate Development & Investor Relations
    +1 713-836-7777
    investor.relations@weatherford.com

    For Media:
    Kelley Hughes
    Senior Director, Communications & Employee Engagement
    media@weatherford.com

    Forward-Looking Statements

    This news release contains projections and forward-looking statements concerning, among other things, the Company’s adjusted EBITDA*, adjusted EBITDA margin*, adjusted free cash flow*, shareholder return program, forecasts or expectations regarding business outlook, prospects for its operations, capital expenditures, expectations regarding future financial results, and are also generally identified by the words “believe,” “project,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “outlook,” “budget,” “intend,” “strategy,” “plan,” “guidance,” “may,” “should,” “could,” “will,” “would,” “will be,” “will continue,” “will likely result,” and similar expressions, although not all forward-looking statements contain these identifying words. Such statements are based upon the current beliefs of Weatherford’s management and are subject to significant risks, assumptions, and uncertainties. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those indicated in our forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned that forward-looking statements are only estimates and may differ materially from actual future events or results, based on factors including but not limited to: global political, economic and market conditions, political disturbances, war or other global conflicts, terrorist attacks, changes in global trade policies, tariffs and sanctions, weak local economic conditions and international currency fluctuations; general global economic repercussions related to U.S. and global inflationary pressures and potential recessionary concerns; various effects from conflicts in the Middle East and the Russia Ukraine conflicts, including, but not limited to, nationalization of assets, extended business interruptions, sanctions, treaties and regulations (including changes in the regulatory environment) imposed by various countries, associated operational and logistical challenges, and impacts to the overall global energy supply; cybersecurity issues; our ability to comply with, and respond to, climate change, environmental, social and governance and other sustainability initiatives and future legislative and regulatory measures both globally and in specific geographic regions; the potential for a resurgence of a pandemic in a given geographic area and related disruptions; the price and price volatility of, and demand for, oil and natural gas; the macroeconomic outlook for the oil and gas industry; our ability to generate cash flow from operations to fund our operations; our ability to effectively and timely adapt our technology portfolio, products and services to remain competitive, and to address and participate in changes to the market demands, including for the transition to alternate sources of energy such as geothermal, carbon capture and responsible abandonment, including our digitalization efforts, increases in the prices and lead times, and the lack of availability of our procured products and services, including due to macroeconomic and geopolitical conditions such as tariffs and changes in trade policies, our ability to timely collect from customers; our ability to effectively execute our capital allocation framework; our ability to return capital to shareholders, including those related to the timing and amounts (including any plans or commitments in respect thereof) of any dividends and share repurchases; and the realization of additional cost savings and operational efficiencies.

    These risks and uncertainties are more fully described in Weatherford’s reports and registration statements filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the risk factors described in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K and Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q. Accordingly, you should not place undue reliance on any of the Company’s forward-looking statements. Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which such statement is made, and the Company undertakes no obligation to correct or update any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by applicable law, and we caution you not to rely on them unduly.

    *Non-GAAP – refer to the section titled Non-GAAP Financial Measures Defined and GAAP to Non-GAAP Financial Measures Reconciled

    Weatherford International plc
    Selected Statements of Operations (Unaudited)
                         
        Three Months Ended   Six Months Ended
    ($ in Millions, Except Per Share Amounts)   June 30,
    2025
      March 31,
    2025
      June 30,
    2024
      June 30,
    2025
      June 30,
    2024
    Revenues:                    
    DRE Revenues   $              335     $                 350     $              427     $            685     $            849  
    WCC Revenues                    456                          441                      504                     897                    962  
    PRI Revenues                    327                          334                      369                     661                    717  
    All Other                       86                            68                      105                     154                    235  
    Total Revenues                 1,204                      1,193                   1,405                 2,397                 2,763  
                         
    Operating Income:                    
    DRE Segment Adjusted EBITDA[1]   $                69     $                    74     $              130     $            143     $            260  
    WCC Segment Adjusted EBITDA[1]                    118                          128                      145                     246                    265  
    PRI Segment Adjusted EBITDA[1]                       63                            62                        85                     125                    158  
    All Other[2]                       19                              4                        23                       23                       50  
    Corporate[2]                     (15 )                        (15 )                    (18 )                   (30 )                   (32 )
    Depreciation and Amortization                     (64 )                        (62 )                    (86 )                 (126 )                (171 )
    Share-based Compensation                       (9 )                          (7 )                    (12 )                   (16 )                   (25 )
    Gain on Sale of Business                       70                            —                        —                       70                       —  
    Restructuring Charges                     (11 )                        (29 )                       (5 )                   (40 )                     (8 )
    Other (Charges) Credits                       (3 )                        (13 )                        2                     (16 )                     —  
    Operating Income                    237                          142                      264                     379                    497  
                         
    Other Expense:                    
    Interest Expense, Net of Interest Income of $14, $11,
    $17, $25 and $31
                        (21 )                        (26 )                    (24 )                   (47 )                   (53 )
    Loss on Blue Chip Swap Securities                       (1 )                          —                      (10 )                     (1 )                   (10 )
    Other Expense, Net                     (24 )                        (20 )                    (20 )                   (44 )                 (42 )
    Income Before Income Taxes                    191                            96                      210                     287                    392  
    Income Tax Provision                     (46 )                        (10 )                    (73 )                   (56 )                (132 )
    Net Income                    145                            86                      137                     231                    260  
    Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests                         9                            10                        12                       19                       23  
    Net Income Attributable to Weatherford   $              136     $                    76     $              125     $            212     $            237  
                         
    Basic Income Per Share   $             1.87     $                1.04     $             1.71     $           2.91     $           3.25  
    Basic Weighted Average Shares Outstanding                   72.2                         73.1                     73.2                    72.7                   73.1  
                         
    Diluted Income Per Share   $             1.87     $                1.03     $             1.66     $           2.90     $           3.16  
    Diluted Weighted Average Shares Outstanding                   72.4                         73.4                     75.3       72.9       75.0  
    [1] Segment adjusted EBITDA is our primary measure of segment profitability under U.S. GAAP ASC 280 “Segment Reporting” and represents segment earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization, share-based compensation, restructuring charges and other adjustments. Research and development expenses are included in segment adjusted EBITDA.
    [2] All Other includes results from non-core business activities (including integrated services and projects), and Corporate includes overhead support and centrally managed or shared facilities costs. All Other and Corporate do not individually meet the criteria for segment reporting.
    Weatherford International plc
    Selected Balance Sheet Data (Unaudited)
           
    ($ in Millions) June 30, 2025   December 31, 2024
    Assets:      
    Cash and Cash Equivalents $                              943   $                                 916
    Restricted Cash                                     60                                         59
    Accounts Receivable, Net                               1,177                                    1,261
    Inventories, Net                                  881                                       880
    Property, Plant and Equipment, Net                               1,136                                    1,061
    Intangibles, Net                                  305                                       325
           
    Liabilities:      
    Accounts Payable                                  685                                       792
    Accrued Salaries and Benefits                                  252                                       302
    Current Portion of Long-term Debt                                     26                                         17
    Long-term Debt                               1,565                                    1,617
           
    Shareholders’ Equity:      
    Total Shareholders’ Equity                               1,519                                    1,283
    Weatherford International plc
    Selected Cash Flows Information (Unaudited)
                         
        Three Months Ended   Six Months Ended
    ($ in Millions)   June 30,
    2025
      March 31,
    2025
      June 30,
    2024
      June 30,
    2025
      June 30,
    2024
    Cash Flows From Operating Activities:                    
    Net Income   $             145     $                    86     $             137     $             231     $             260  
    Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income to Net Cash
    Provided By Operating Activities:
                       
    Depreciation and Amortization                      64                             62                        86                      126                      171  
    Foreign Exchange Losses                      17                             13                          8                        30                        23  
    Loss on Blue Chip Swap Securities                        1                             —                        10                          1                        10  
    Gain on Disposition of Assets                      (3 )                           (1 )                    (25 )                      (4 )                    (32 )
    Gain on Sale of Business                    (70 )                           —                        —                      (70 )                      —   
    Deferred Income Tax Provision (Benefit)                      (5 )                             7                        13                          2                        27  
    Share-Based Compensation                        9                               7                        12                        16                        25  
    Changes in Accounts Receivable, Inventory, Accounts
    Payable and Accrued Salaries and Benefits
                       (22 )                         (17 )                    (22 )                    (39 )                  (174 )
    Other Changes, Net                      (8 )                         (15 )                    (69 )                    (23 )                    (29 )
    Net Cash Provided By Operating Activities                    128                          142                      150                      270                      281  
                         
    Cash Flows From Investing Activities:                    
    Capital Expenditures for Property, Plant and Equipment                    (54 )                         (77 )                    (62 )                  (131 )                  (121 )
    Proceeds from Disposition of Assets                        5                               1                          8                          6                        18  
    Proceeds from Sale of Businesses                      97                             —                        —                        97                        —   
    Purchases of Blue Chip Swap Securities                    (83 )                           —                      (50 )                    (83 )                    (50 )
    Proceeds from Sales of Blue Chip Swap Securities                      82                             —                        40                        82                        40  
    Business Acquisitions, Net of Cash Acquired                      —                             —                        —                        —                       (36 )
    Proceeds from Sale of Investments                      —                             —                        —                        —                         41  
    Other Investing Activities                      (4 )                           (3 )                        3                        (7 )                      (7 )
    Net Cash Provided by (Used In) Investing Activities                      43                           (79 )                    (61 )                    (36 )                  (115 )
                         
    Cash Flows From Financing Activities:                    
    Repayments of Long-term Debt                    (34 )                         (39 )                    (87 )                    (73 )                  (259 )
       Distributions to Noncontrolling Interests                      (8 )                           —                        (9 )                      (8 )                      (9 )
    Tax Remittance on Equity Awards                      —                           (20 )                      (1 )                    (20 )                      (9 )
    Share Repurchases                    (34 )                         (53 )                      —                      (87 )                      —   
    Dividends Paid                    (18 )                         (18 )                      —                      (36 )                      —   
    Other Financing Activities                      (3 )                           (3 )                      (5 )                      (6 )                    (12 )
    Net Cash Used In Financing Activities   $              (97 )   $                (133 )   $           (102 )   $           (230 )   $           (289 )
    Weatherford International plc
    Non-GAAP Financial Measures Defined (Unaudited)

    We report our financial results in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). However, Weatherford’s management believes that certain non-GAAP financial measures (as defined under the SEC’s Regulation G and Item 10(e) of Regulation S-K) may provide users of this financial information additional meaningful comparisons between current results and results of prior periods and comparisons with peer companies. The non-GAAP amounts shown in the following tables should not be considered as substitutes for results reported in accordance with GAAP but should be viewed in addition to the Company’s reported results prepared in accordance with GAAP.

    Adjusted EBITDA* – Adjusted EBITDA* is a non-GAAP measure and represents consolidated income before interest expense, net, income taxes, depreciation and amortization expense, and excludes, among other items, restructuring charges, share-based compensation expense, as well as other charges and credits. Management believes adjusted EBITDA* is useful to assess and understand normalized operating performance and trends. Adjusted EBITDA* should be considered in addition to, but not as a substitute for consolidated net income and should be viewed in addition to the Company’s reported results prepared in accordance with GAAP.

    Adjusted EBITDA margin* – Adjusted EBITDA margin* is a non-GAAP measure which is calculated by dividing consolidated adjusted EBITDA* by consolidated revenues. Management believes adjusted EBITDA margin* is useful to assess and understand normalized operating performance and trends. Adjusted EBITDA margin* should be considered in addition to, but not as a substitute for consolidated net income margin and should be viewed in addition to the Company’s reported results prepared in accordance with GAAP.

    Adjusted Free Cash Flow* – Adjusted Free Cash Flow* is a non-GAAP measure and represents cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities, less capital expenditures plus proceeds from the disposition of assets. Management believes adjusted free cash flow* is useful to understand our performance at generating cash and demonstrates our discipline around the use of cash. Adjusted free cash flow* should be considered in addition to, but not as a substitute for cash flows provided by operating activities and should be viewed in addition to the Company’s reported results prepared in accordance with GAAP.

    Net Debt* – Net Debt* is a non-GAAP measure that is calculated taking short and long-term debt less cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash. Management believes the net debt* is useful to assess the level of debt in excess of cash and cash and equivalents as we monitor our ability to repay and service our debt. Net debt* should be considered in addition to, but not as a substitute for overall debt and total cash and should be viewed in addition to the Company’s results prepared in accordance with GAAP.​

    Net Leverage* – Net Leverage* is a non-GAAP measure which is calculated by dividing by taking net debt* divided by adjusted EBITDA* for the trailing 12 months. Management believes the net leverage* is useful to understand our ability to repay and service our debt. Net leverage* should be considered in addition to, but not as a substitute for the individual components of above defined net debt* divided by consolidated net income attributable to Weatherford and should be viewed in addition to the Company’s reported results prepared in accordance with GAAP.

    *Non-GAAP – as defined above and reconciled to the GAAP measures in the section titled GAAP to Non-GAAP Financial Measures Reconciled

    Weatherford International plc
    GAAP to Non-GAAP Financial Measures Reconciled (Unaudited)
     
                         
        Three Months Ended   Six Months Ended
    ($ in Millions, Except Margin in Percentages)   June 30,
    2025
      March 31,
    2025
      June 30,
    2024
      June 30,
    2025
      June 30,
    2024
    Revenues   $         1,204     $          1,193     $         1,405     $      2,397     $      2,763  
    Net Income Attributable to Weatherford   $            136     $                76     $            125     $         212     $         237  
    Net Income Margin     11.3 %     6.4 %     8.9 %     8.8 %     8.6 %
    Adjusted EBITDA*   $            254     $              253     $            365     $         507     $         701  
    Adjusted EBITDA Margin*     21.1 %     21.2 %     26.0 %     21.2 %     25.4 %
                         
    Net Income Attributable to Weatherford   $            136     $                76     $            125     $         212     $         237  
    Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests                       9                        10                       12                    19                    23  
    Income Tax Provision                     46                        10                       73                    56                 132  
    Interest Expense, Net of Interest Income of $14, $11,
    $17, $25 and $31
                        21                        26                       24                    47                    53  
    Loss on Blue Chip Swap Securities                       1                        —                       10                      1                    10  
    Other Expense, Net                     24                        20                       20                    44                    42  
    Operating Income                  237                      142                    264                 379                 497  
    Depreciation and Amortization                     64                        62                       86                 126                 171  
    Other Charges (Credits)[1]                       3                        13                       (2 )                  16                    —  
    Gain on Sale of Business                   (70 )                      —                       —                  (70 )                  —  
    Restructuring Charges                     11                        29                         5                    40                      8  
    Share-Based Compensation                       9                          7                       12                    16                    25  
    Adjusted EBITDA*   $            254     $              253     $            365     $         507     $         701  
                         
    Net Cash Provided By Operating Activities   $            128     $              142     $            150     $         270     $         281  
    Capital Expenditures for Property, Plant and
    Equipment
                      (54 )                    (77 )                   (62 )             (131 )             (121 )
    Proceeds from Disposition of Assets                       5                          1                         8                      6                    18  
    Adjusted Free Cash Flow*   $              79     $                66     $              96     $         145     $         178  
    [1] Other Charges (Credits) in the three and six months ended June 30, 2025 primarily includes fees to third-party financial institutions related to collections of certain receivables from our largest customer in Mexico and other miscellaneous charges and credits.

    *Non-GAAP – as reconciled to the GAAP measures above and defined in the section titled Non-GAAP Financial Measures Defined

    Weatherford International plc
    GAAP to Non-GAAP Financial Measures Reconciled Continued (Unaudited)
     
                   
         
    ($ in Millions)   June 30,
    2025
      March 31,
    2025
      June 30,
    2024
     
    Current Portion of Long-term Debt   $                   26   $                    22   $                   20  
    Long-term Debt                    1,565                    1,583                    1,628  
    Total Debt   $              1,591   $              1,605   $              1,648  
                   
    Cash and Cash Equivalents   $                 943   $                 873   $                 862  
    Restricted Cash                          60                          57                          58  
    Total Cash   $              1,003   $                 930   $                 920  
                   
    Components of Net Debt              
    Current Portion of Long-term Debt   $                   26   $                    22   $                   20  
    Long-term Debt                    1,565                    1,583                    1,628  
    Less: Cash and Cash Equivalents                       943                        873                       862  
    Less: Restricted Cash                          60                          57                          58  
    Net Debt*   $                 588   $                 675   $                 728  
                   
    Net Income for trailing 12 months   $                 481   $                 470   $                 500  
    Adjusted EBITDA* for trailing 12 months   $              1,188   $              1,299   $              1,327  
                   
    Net Leverage* (Net Debt*/Adjusted EBITDA*)                      0.49 x                     0.52 x                    0.55 x


    *Non-GAAP – as reconciled to the GAAP measures above and defined in the section titled Non-GAAP Financial Measures Defined

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI: Ellomay Capital Announces the Acquisition of 15% of Dorad Energy’s Shares by Ellomay Luzon Energy, Increasing Ellomay Luzon Energy’s Holdings in Dorad to 33.75%

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Tel-Aviv, Israel, July 22, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Ellomay Capital Ltd. (NYSE American; TASE: ELLO) (“Ellomay” or the “Company”), a renewable energy and power generator and developer of renewable energy and power projects in Europe, the USA and Israel, announced that on July 22, 2025, Ellomay Luzon Energy Infrastructures Ltd. (“Ellomay Luzon Energy”), an Israeli private company 50% held indirectly by the Company, completed the acquisition of 15% of the outstanding shares of Dorad Energy Ltd. (“Dorad”). As a result of the acquisition, Ellomay Luzon Energy holds 33.75% of Dorad’s outstanding shares.  

    Ellomay Luzon Energy acquired 15% of Dorad’s outstanding shares by exercising the right of first refusal granted to Ellomay Luzon Energy and other Dorad shareholders in connection with a sale of the shares by Zorlu Enerji Elektrik Üretim A.S (“Zorlu”), a former Dorad shareholder. In connection with the right of first refusal process, Ellomay Luzon Energy and Edelcom Ltd. (“Edelcom”), each executed an agreement to purchase 7.5% of Dorad’s shares. As not all the conditions to closing of the sale of 7.5% of Dorad’s shares to Edelcom were fulfilled, Edelcom’s agreement was terminated and Ellomay Luzon Energy, who did succeed in fulfilling all of the conditions to closing, acquired 15% of Dorad’s shares.

    The consideration for the shares was approximately NIS 424 million (approximately €108 million), and was funded by bank financing (the “Loan Agreement”) provided to Ellomay Luzon Energy consisting of three tranches as follows: (i) a loan in the amount of NIS 175 million (approximately €45 million), bearing annual interest in the range of +0.5% to -0.5% of the Israeli Prime Rate (the “First Loan”), (ii) a loan in the amount of NIS 175 million (approximately €45 million), bearing fixed annual interest rate between 5% and 6% (the “Second Loan”), and (iii) a loan in the amount of NIS 70 million (approximately €18 million), bearing annual interest rate in the range of +0.5% to -0.5% of the Israeli Prime Rate (the “Third Loan”).

    The First Loan is repayable in four semi-annual payments commencing December 31, 2031 and ending on June 30, 2033, and the interest on the First Loan is payable in semi-annual payments commencing December 31, 2025 and ending on the final repayment of the First Loan. The Second Loan is repayable in sixteen semi-annual payments commencing December 31, 2025 and ending on June 30, 2033, and the interest on the Second Loan is payable in semi-annual payment commencing December 31, 2025 and ending on the final repayment of the Second Loan. The Third Loan is repayable in one payment on December 31, 2025, unless the conditions set forth in the Loan Agreement will not be met, which will enable Ellomay Luzon Energy to ask for an extension until December 31, 2026. The interest on the Third Loan is payable on December 31, 2025 and, to the extent an extension is requested, in semi-annual payments thereafter until the final repayment of the Third Loan.

    In connection with the Loan Agreement, Ellomay Luzon Energy granted the lender a first ranking fixed pledge on its rights in connection with an account with the lender (the “Pledged Account”), in which all amounts due to Ellomay Luzon Energy from Dorad will be deposited. The Loan Agreement provides that when any dividend is received from Dorad: (i) Ellomay Luzon Energy will leave in the Pledged Account the amount required for the next payment to the lender, (ii) to the extent the amount received during a calendar year exceeds NIS 65 million, then Ellomay Luzon Energy will make an early repayment of the First Loan and thereafter the Third Loan in the amount of 50% of the difference between the amount of receipts in the calendar year and NIS 65 million by no later than June 30 of the following year (pro rata over all future payments), and (iii) with respect to any amount in excess of the amounts required as stated in paragraphs (i) and (ii) – Ellomay Luzon Energy is entitled to use the funds deposited in the Pledged Account for any need, subject to the provisions of the law and the agreements with the lender. The Loan Agreement provides that the First and Third Loans may be prepaid without an early repayment fee and the Second Loan may be prepaid subject to payment of fees as generally acceptable in the lender.

    The Loan Agreement includes customary immediate repayment provisions, including in the event of a breach of an undertaking by Ellomay Luzon Energy, a deterioration in Ellomay Luzon Energy’s financial situation and the initiation of legal proceedings in connection with the Dorad shares held by Ellomay Luzon Energy. The Loan Agreement includes additional undertakings by Ellomay Luzon Energy, including not to amend the Ellomay Luzon Energy shareholders’ agreement without the lender’s prior written consent and the execution of an undertaking not to operate outside its current field of operations; not to assume financial obligations and not to provide financing to a third party; not to sell and/or transfer and/or deliver and/or lease and/or rent any Asset and/or any right of its rights, as well as a negative pledge on any Asset (as this term is defined below) and/or part of the its Assets, without the lender’s prior written consent, other than a pledge on its shares of Dorad in favor of the lenders of Dorad. The undertaking defines an “Asset” as any asset and right of Ellomay Luzon Energy, including the shares of Dorad held by it and other rights of any kind, including its unissued share capital and goodwill.

    On July 20, 2025, Edelcom filed a request with the Tel Aviv-Jaffa District Court (the “Court”) for injunctions and temporary injunctions, ex parte, aimed at preventing the receipt of approval from the Dorad board of directors and Dorad’s shareholders for the sale of 7.5% of Dorad’s shares to any third party other than Edelcom and preventing such a sale. The Court, in its decision date July 20, 2025, rejected the request for ex parte relief and directed Edelcom to update the Court on the decisions of Dorad’s board of directors and shareholders by July 22, 2025, and, to the extent that the request for interim relief is still relevant, to file a main proceeding by July 27, 2025, further noting that the respondents (among them, inter alia: Dorad, Ellomay Luzon Energy and Zorlu), will prepare to respond to the request for interim relief by July 30, 2025. The Court’s decision further noted that if future actions will be approved by Dorad based on a transfer of shares if it occurs (and this, as stated, without the Court preventing it), whereby the increased power of the respondents as shareholders is used for the purpose of changes in Dorad’s board of directors, or the transfer of the shares to third parties, as Edelcom noted that it fears, and to the extent that the respondents will try to take such actions or other irrevocable action, Edelcom will be notified seven days in advance, in a manner that will allow it time to act and the Court to give appropriate instructions. A hearing is scheduled for August 6, 2025.

    About Ellomay Capital Ltd.

    Ellomay is an Israeli based company whose shares are registered with the NYSE American and with the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange under the trading symbol “ELLO”. Since 2009, Ellomay focuses its business in the renewable energy and power sectors in Europe, the USA and Israel.

    To date, Ellomay has evaluated numerous opportunities and invested significant funds in the renewable, clean energy and natural resources industries in Israel, Italy, Spain, the Netherlands and Texas, USA, including:

    • Approximately 335.9 MW of operating solar power plants in Spain (including a 300 MW solar plant in owned by Talasol, which is 51% owned by the Company) and 51% of approximately 38 MW of operating solar power plants in Italy;
    • 9.375% indirect interest in Dorad Energy Ltd., which owns and operates one of Israel’s largest private power plants with production capacity of approximately 850MW, representing about 6%-8% of Israel’s total current electricity consumption;
    • Groen Gas Goor B.V., Groen Gas Oude-Tonge B.V. and Groen Gas Gelderland B.V., project companies operating anaerobic digestion plants in the Netherlands, with a green gas production capacity of approximately 3 million, 3.8 million and 9.5 million Nm3 per year, respectively;
    • 83.333% of Ellomay Pumped Storage (2014) Ltd., which is involved in a project to construct a 156 MW pumped storage hydro power plant in the Manara Cliff, Israel;
    • 51% of solar projects in Italy with an aggregate capacity of 160 MW that commenced construction processes;
    • Solar projects in Italy with an aggregate capacity of 134 MW that have reached “ready to build” status; and
    • Solar projects in the Dallas Metropolitan area, Texas, USA with an aggregate capacity of approximately 27 MW that are connected to the grid and additional 22 MW that are awaiting connection to the grid.

    For more information about Ellomay, visit http://www.ellomay.com.

    Information Relating to Forward-Looking Statements

    This press release contains forward-looking statements that involve substantial risks and uncertainties, including statements that are based on the current expectations and assumptions of the Company’s management. All statements, other than statements of historical facts, included in this press release regarding the Company’s plans and objectives, expectations and assumptions of management are forward-looking statements. The use of certain words, including the words “estimate,” “project,” “intend,” “expect,” “believe” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The Company may not actually achieve the plans, intentions or expectations disclosed in the forward-looking statements and you should not place undue reliance on the Company’s forward-looking statements. Various important factors could cause actual results or events to differ materially from those that may be expressed or implied by the Company’s forward-looking statements, including potential outcome of current and future litigation in connection with Dorad’s shares held by Ellomay Luzon Energy, changes in electricity prices and demand, regulatory changes increases in interest rates and inflation, changes in the supply and prices of resources required for the operation of the Company’s facilities (such as waste and natural gas) and in the price of oil, the impact of the war and hostilities in Israel and Gaza and between Israel and Iran, the impact of the continued military conflict between Russia and Ukraine, technical and other disruptions in the operations or construction of the power plants owned by the Company, inability to obtain the financing required for the development and construction of projects, inability to advance the expansion of Dorad, increases in interest rates and inflation, changes in exchange rates, delays in development, construction, or commencement of operation of the projects under development, failure to obtain permits – whether within the set time frame or at all, climate change, and general market, political and economic conditions in the countries in which the Company operates, including Israel, Spain, Italy and the United States. and general market, political and economic conditions in the countries in which the Company operates, including Israel, Spain, Italy and the United States. These and other risks and uncertainties associated with the Company’s business are described in greater detail in the filings the Company makes from time to time with Securities and Exchange Commission, including its Annual Report on Form 20-F. The forward-looking statements are made as of this date and the Company does not undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

    Contact:
    Kalia Rubenbach (Weintraub)
    CFO
    Tel: +972 (3) 797-1111
    Email: hilai@ellomay.com

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-Evening Report: Kneecap’s stance on Gaza extends a long history of the Irish supporting other oppressed peoples

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Ciara Smart, PhD Graduand in Australasian Irish History, University of Tasmania

    Love them or hate them, there’s no doubt Irish hip-hop trio Kneecap are having a moment.

    Their music – delivered in a powerful fusion of English and Irish – is known for its gritty lyrics about party drugs and working-class life in post-Troubles Ireland. More recently, the group has made headlines for its outspoken support for the Palestinian people.

    British police have charged member Liam Óg Ó hAnnaidh (known by his stage name Mo Chara) with a terrorism offence. Ó hAnnaidh was charged in May, after being accused of displaying a Hezbollah flag at a London concert in November.

    But this isn’t the first time an Irish republican group has courted controversy for backing other oppressed peoples. This has been happening for almost two centuries.

    Unsanitised and vocal support

    Ireland is composed of 32 counties. Twenty-six are in the Republic of Ireland, while six are part of the United Kingdom in Northern Ireland. When the British government withdrew from most of Ireland in 1921, the Irish Free State was largely Catholic, while Northern Ireland was more heavily Protestant. But these divisions are becoming increasingly irrelevant.

    While Ireland is still split across two nations, public support for Irish unity remains strong, particularly among citizens of the Republic.

    Kneecap’s members are from Belfast, the capital of Northern Ireland. They are also fierce republicans, which means they want to see Ireland united as one nation. One of their most popular songs, Get Your Brits Out, calls for the British state’s withdrawal from Northern Ireland.

    The group has experienced a meteoric rise in recent years, helped by a semi-autobiographical film released last year.

    They have reclaimed the term “Fenian”, often used as an anti-Irish slur. Their decision to rap in Irish is also a cultural milestone, as the language was suppressed in Northern Ireland for most of the 20th century, only achieving official language status in 2022.

    Despite being undeniable provocateurs, they claim they aren’t
    interested in reigniting Catholic-Protestant conflict. They celebrate the similarities between both groups, rather than highlight their differences.

    Ó hAnnaidh’s alleged terrorism offence came after he waved a Hezbollah flag at a London gig and chanted “Up Hamas, up Hezbollah”. Both Hamas and Hezbollah are considered terrorist groups in Britain. He will face court on August 20.

    Irish-Māori solidarity

    Kneecap is carrying on a long tradition of Irish groups who faced controversy for denouncing the oppressive acts of powerful states.

    In the 19th century, several Irish nationalist groups expressed solidarity with other colonised peoples, especially Māori in Aotearoa New Zealand. Groups such as the Irish Republican Brotherhood (whose members were called Fenians) arguably saw Māori and Irish as co-victims of a tyrannical state.

    Irish nationalist newspapers often wrote sympathetically about the colonisation of New Zealand, and tried to inspire Ireland to resist British subjugation, like Māori seemed to be doing.

    This painting by Kennett Watkins, The Death of Von Tempsky at Te Ngutu o Te Manu (circa 1893), portrays conflict in 1868 between armed constabulary and Māori forces.
    Wikimedia

    In July 1864, the Fenian newspaper The Irish People stressed British hypocrisy. It wrote, “savages we call [Māori], using the arrogant language of civilisation, but, honestly, they deserve to be characterised by a much better word”.

    It also scoffed at the “unconquerable propensity of the Anglo-Saxon to plunder the lands of other people – a propensity which manifests itself most strikingly alike in Ireland and New Zealand”.

    Similarly, in December 1868, the nationalist newspaper The Nation contrasted “valiant” Māori with “terrified” British. It sarcastically described Māori as “rebels (men fighting for their own rights on their own soil)” and mocked the British forces as “valiant men who could bully a priest”.

    The article finished on a sombre note: “Mere valour will in the end go down before the force of numbers and the cunning of diplomacy”.

    Rumours of a secret rebellion

    Other Irish leaders, such as the nationalist Michael Davitt, saw inspirational parallels between the nonviolent campaign of Charles Stewart Parnell, the 19th century leader of the Irish Home Rule movement, and Māori leader Te Whiti-o-Rongomai.

    In Ireland, Parnell encouraged poor tenant farmers to pause rent payments to their British landlords. In New Zealand, Te Whiti encouraged Māori to dismantle colonially-constructed fences and plough the land for themselves. Both were arrested in 1881 within three weeks of each other.

    The ‘No Rent Manifesto’ was issued on 18 October 1881, by Parnell and others of the Irish National Land League while in Kilmainham Jail.
    National Library of Ireland

    So strong was the sense of kinship between Irish and Māori that, in the 1860s, there were persistent rumours of a joint Irish-Māori rebellion reported in the media and even New Zealand’s parliament.

    In March, 1869, the conservative New Zealand newspaper Daily Southern Cross reported a large number of Māori “have decided on joining the Fenian Brotherhood, and have adopted the green flag as their national emblem”.

    Later that year, the paper reported the supposed Fenians told a Māori resistance group that, “like the Maori, they hate the British rule, and are prepared to make common cause […] to overthrow that rule in New Zealand”.

    However, these rumours were probably no more than a conspiracy fuelled by racist anti-Irish paranoia.

    Actions and outcomes

    Any tangible results of cross-cultural sympathy from 19th century Irish nationalists were mixed, at best. My ongoing research shows solidarity with Māori was partly motivated by humanitarian motives, but was also often used to make a point about Ireland.

    Identifying with another oppressed peoples within the context of a corrupt empire was a powerful way to argue for improved political recognition within Ireland. Irish nationalists generally didn’t do much other than declare their sympathy.

    Kneecap, on the other hand, seems willing to bear the legal and financial consequences of being vocal about human rights abuses in Gaza. Some of their shows have been cancelled, and funding providers have withdrawn.

    While curated rebellion can be lucrative in show-business, Kneecap says the controversy following them is a distraction. They insist the world should focus squarely on Gaza instead.

    Ciara Smart does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. Kneecap’s stance on Gaza extends a long history of the Irish supporting other oppressed peoples – https://theconversation.com/kneecaps-stance-on-gaza-extends-a-long-history-of-the-irish-supporting-other-oppressed-peoples-261261

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz