Category: Trump administration

  • MIL-OSI China: Trump says it may be better for Russia-Ukraine conflict to last longer

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    U.S. President Donald Trump said Thursday that it might be better to let Russia and Ukraine keep on fighting for a while despite German Chancellor Friedrich Merz’s call for more U.S. pressure on Russia.

    When meeting with Merz at the White House, Trump said that the “bad blood” and “hatred” between the sides would make it hard to reach a ceasefire any time soon, marking a shift from his earlier proclamation that the conflict would end quickly.

    “They fight, fight, fight,” Trump said. “Sometimes you let them fight for a little while. You see it in hockey. You see it in sports. The referees let them go for a couple of seconds. Let them go for a little while before you pull them apart.”

    During the meeting, Merz told Trump that “America is again in a very strong position of ending this war,” adding: “We are looking for more pressure on Russia.”

    On new sanctions on Russia, Trump said on Thursday that nothing was imminent. However, he hinted he might sanction both Russia and Ukraine because “it takes two to tango.”

    “When I see the moment when it’s not going to stop, we’ll be very tough,” Trump said. “And it could be on both countries.”

    MIL OSI China News

  • Trump and Xi agree to more talks as trade disputes brew

    Source: Government of India

    Source: Government of India (4)

    U.S. President Donald Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping confronted weeks of brewing trade tensions and a battle over critical minerals in a rare leader-to-leader call on Thursday that left key issues to further talks.

    During the more than one-hour-long call, Xi told Trump to back down from trade measures that roiled the global economy and warned him against threatening steps on Taiwan, according to a Chinese government summary.

    But Trump said on social media that the talks focused primarily on trade led to “a very positive conclusion,” announcing further lower-level U.S.-China discussions, and that “there should no longer be any questions respecting the complexity of Rare Earth products.”

    He later told reporters: “We’re in very good shape with China and the trade deal.”

    The leaders also invited each other to visit their respective countries.

    The highly anticipated call came in the middle of a dispute between Washington and Beijing in recent weeks over “rare earths” minerals that threatened to tear up a fragile truce in the trade war between the two biggest economies. It was not clear from either countries’ statements that the issue had been resolved.

    A U.S. delegation led by Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and Trade Representative Jamieson Greer will meet with their Chinese counterparts “shortly at a location to be determined,” Trump said on social media.

    The countries struck a 90-day deal on May 12 to roll back some of the triple-digit, tit-for-tat tariffs they had placed on each other since Trump’s January inauguration.

    Though stocks rallied, the temporary deal did not address broader concerns that strain the bilateral relationship, from the illicit fentanyl trade to the status of democratically governed Taiwan and U.S. complaints about China’s state-dominated, export-driven economic model.

    Since returning to the White House in January, Trump has repeatedly threatened an array of punitive measures on trading partners, only to revoke some of them at the last minute. The on-again, off-again approach has baffled world leaders and spooked business executives.

    China’s decision in April to suspend exports of a wide range of critical minerals and magnets continues to disrupt supplies needed by automakers, computer chip manufacturers and military contractors around the world.

    Beijing sees mineral exports as a source of leverage – halting those exports could put domestic political pressure on the Republican U.S. president if economic growth sags because companies cannot make mineral-powered products.

    The 90-day deal to roll back tariffs and trade restrictions is tenuous. Trump has accused China of violating the agreement and has ordered curbs on chip-design software and other shipments to China. Beijing rejected the claim and threatened counter-measures.

    “The U.S. side should take a realistic view of the progress made and withdraw the negative measures imposed on China,” the Chinese government said in a statement summarizing Xi’s call with Trump published by the state-run Xinhua news agency. “Xi Jinping emphasized that the United States should handle the Taiwan issue prudently.”

    TOP RIVALS

    In recent years, the United States has identified China as its top geopolitical rival and the only country in the world able to challenge the U.S. economically and militarily.

    Despite this and repeated tariff announcements, Trump has spoken admiringly of Xi, including of the Chinese leader’s toughness and ability to stay in power without the term limits imposed on U.S. presidents.

    Trump has long pushed for a call or a meeting with Xi, but China has rejected that as not in keeping with its traditional approach of working out agreement details before the leaders talk.

    The U.S. president and his aides see leader-to-leader talks as vital to sort through log-jams that have vexed lower-level officials in difficult negotiations.

    Thursday’s call came at Trump’s request, China said.

    It’s not clear when the two men last spoke.

    Both sides said they spoke on Jan. 17, days before Trump’s inauguration and Trump has repeatedly said that he had spoken to Xi since taking office on Jan. 20. He has declined to say when any call took place or to give details of their conversation. China had said that the two leaders had not had any recent phone calls.

    The talks are being closely watched by investors worried that a chaotic trade war could disrupt supply chains in the key months before the Christmas holiday shopping season. Trump’s tariffs are the subject of ongoing litigation in U.S. courts.

    Trump has met Xi on several occasions, including exchange visits in 2017, but they have not met face to face since 2019 talks in Osaka, Japan.

    Xi last traveled to the U.S. in November 2023, for a summit with then-President Joe Biden, resulting in agreements to resume military-to-military communications and curb fentanyl production.

    (Reuters)

  • Trump administration imposes sanctions on four ICC judges in unprecedented move

    Source: Government of India

    Source: Government of India (4)

    President Donald Trump’s administration on Thursday imposed sanctions on four judges at the International Criminal Court, an unprecedented retaliation over the war tribunal’s issuance of an arrest warrant for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and a past decision to open a case into alleged war crimes by U.S. troops in Afghanistan.

    Washington designated Solomy Balungi Bossa of Uganda, Luz del Carmen Ibanez Carranza of Peru, Reine Adelaide Sophie Alapini Gansou of Benin and Beti Hohler of Slovenia, according to a statement from U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio.

    “As ICC judges, these four individuals have actively engaged in the ICC’s illegitimate and baseless actions targeting America or our close ally, Israel. The ICC is politicized and falsely claims unfettered discretion to investigate, charge, and prosecute nationals of the United States and our allies,” Rubio said.

    The ICC slammed the move, saying it was an attempt to undermine the independence of an international judicial institution that provides hope and justice to millions of victims of “unimaginable atrocities.”

    Both judges Bossa and Ibanez Carranza have been on the ICC bench since 2018. In 2020 they were involved in an appeals chamber decision that allowed the ICC prosecutor to open a formal investigation into alleged war crimes by American troops in Afghanistan.

    Since 2021, the court had deprioritized the investigation into American troops in Afghanistan and focused on alleged crimes committed by the Afghan government and the Taliban forces.

    ICC judges also issued arrest warrants for Netanyahu, former Israeli defense chief Yoav Gallant and Hamas leader Ibrahim Al-Masri last November for alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity during the Gaza conflict. Alapini Gansou and Hohler ruled to authorize the arrest warrant against Netanyahu and Gallant, Rubio said.

    The move deepens the administration’s animosity toward the court. During the first Trump administration in 2020, Washington imposed sanctions on then-prosecutor Fatou Bensouda and one of her top aides over the court’s work on Afghanistan.

    The measures also follow a January vote at the U.S. House of Representatives to punish the ICC in protest over its Netanyahu arrest warrant. The move underscored strong support among Trump’s fellow Republicans for Israel’s government.

    DIFFICULT TIME FOR ICC

    The measures triggered uproar among human-rights advocates. Liz Evenson, international justice director at Human Rights Watch, said the punitive measures were a “flagrant attack on the rule of law at the same time as President Trump is working to undercut it at home.”

    Sanctions severely hamper individuals’ abilities to carry out even routine financial transactions as any banks with ties to the United States, or that conduct transactions in dollars, are expected to have to comply with the restrictions.

    But the Treasury Department also issued general licenses, including one allowing the wind-down of any existing transactions involving those targeted on Thursday until July 8, as long as any payment to them is made to a blocked, interest-bearing account located in the U.S.

    The new sanctions come at a difficult time for the ICC, which is already reeling from earlier U.S. sanctions against its chief prosecutor, Karim Khan, who last month stepped aside temporarily amid a United Nations investigation into his alleged sexual misconduct.

    The ICC, which was established in 2002, has international jurisdiction to prosecute genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes in member states or if a situation is referred by the U.N. Security Council. The United States, China, Russia and Israel are not members.

    It has high-profile war crimes investigations under way into the Israel-Hamas conflict and Russia’s war in Ukraine as well as in Sudan, Myanmar, the Philippines, Venezuela and Afghanistan.

    The ICC has issued arrest warrants for President Vladimir Putin on suspicion of deporting children from Ukraine, and for Netanyahu for alleged war crimes in Gaza. Neither country is a member of the court and both deny the accusations and reject ICC jurisdiction.

    (Reuters)

  • Trump ban on entry of international Harvard students blocked by US judge

    Source: Government of India

    Source: Government of India (4)

    A federal judge in Boston on Thursday temporarily blocked U.S. President Donald Trump from barring U.S. entry of foreign nationals seeking to study or participate in exchange programs at Harvard University.

    Under a two-page temporary restraining order granted to Harvard, U.S. District Judge Allison Burroughs enjoined Trump’s proclamation from taking effect pending further litigation of the matter amid an escalating dispute between the Ivy League school and Republican president.

    The judge ruled that Trump’s directive prohibiting foreign nationals from entering the United States to study at Harvard for the next six months would cause “immediate and irreparable injury” before the courts have a chance to review the case.

    Burroughs last month had blocked Trump from implementing a separate order prohibiting Harvard from enrolling international students, who make up more than a quarter of its student body. Harvard on Thursday amended its lawsuit to challenge the new directive, claiming Trump is violating Burroughs’ decision.

    “The Proclamation denies thousands of Harvard’s students the right to come to this country to pursue their education and follow their dreams, and it denies Harvard the right to teach them. Without its international students, Harvard is not Harvard,” the school said in the filing.

    Burroughs’ order on Thursday also continued a separate temporary restraining order she issued on May 23 against the administration’s restriction on international student enrollment at Harvard.

    Earlier on Thursday, White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson called Harvard “a hotbed of anti-American, anti-Semitic, pro-terrorist agitators,” claims that the school has previously denied.

    “Harvard’s behavior has jeopardized the integrity of the entire U.S. student and exchange visitor visa system and risks compromising national security. Now it must face the consequences of its actions,” Jackson said in a statement.

    Trump cited national security concerns as justification for barring international students from entering the U.S. to pursue studies at the Cambridge, Massachusetts-based university.

    Under Trump’s proclamation, the suspension would initially be for six months but could be extended. Trump’s order also directed the U.S. State Department to consider revoking academic or exchange visas of any current Harvard students who meet his proclamation’s criteria.

    In Thursday’s court filing, Harvard said Trump had violated federal law by failing to back up his claims about national security.

    “The Proclamation does not deem the entry of an alien or class of aliens to be detrimental to the interests of the United States, because noncitizens who are impacted by the Proclamation can enter the United States — just so long as they go somewhere other than Harvard,” the school said.

    The Trump administration has launched a multifront attack on the nation’s oldest and wealthiest university, freezing billions of dollars in grants and other funding and proposing to end its tax-exempt status, prompting a series of legal challenges.

    Harvard argues the administration is retaliating against it for refusing to accede to demands to control the school’s governance, curriculum and the ideology of its faculty and students.

    The university sued after Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem announced on May 22 that her department was immediately revoking Harvard’s Student and Exchange Visitor Program certification, which allows it to enroll foreign students.

    Noem’s action was temporarily blocked almost immediately by Burroughs. On the eve of a hearing before her last week, the department changed course and said it would instead challenge Harvard’s certification through a lengthier administrative process.

    Nonetheless, Burroughs said she planned to issue a longer-term preliminary injunction at Harvard’s urging, saying one was necessary to give some protection to Harvard’s international students.

    Wednesday’s two-page directive from Trump said Harvard had “demonstrated a history of concerning foreign ties and radicalism,” and had “extensive entanglements with foreign adversaries,” including China.

    It said Harvard had seen a “drastic rise in crime in recent years while failing to discipline at least some categories of conduct violations on campus,” and had failed to provide sufficient information to the Homeland Security Department about foreign students’ “known illegal or dangerous activities.”

    The school in Thursday’s court filing said those claims were unsubstantiated.

    (Reuters)

  • Musk-Trump breakup puts $22 billion of SpaceX contracts at risk, jolting US space program

    Source: Government of India

    Source: Government of India (4)

    About $22 billion of SpaceX’s government contracts are at risk and multiple U.S. space programs could face dramatic changes in the fallout from Elon Musk and President Donald Trump’s explosive feud on Thursday.

    The disagreement, rooted in Musk’s criticism of Trump’s tax-cut and spending legislation that began last week, quickly spiraled out of control. Trump lashed out at Musk when the president spoke in the Oval Office. Then in a series of X posts, Musk launched barbs at Trump, who threatened to terminate government contracts with Musk’s companies.

    Taking the threat seriously, Musk said he would begin “decommissioning” SpaceX’s Dragon spacecraft used by NASA.

    Hours later, however, Musk appeared to reverse course. Responding to a follower on X urging him and Trump to “cool off and take a step back for a couple of days,” Musk wrote: “Good advice. Ok, we won’t decommission Dragon.”

    Still, Musk’s mere threat to abruptly pull its Dragon spacecraft out of service marked an unprecedented outburst from one of NASA’s leading commercial partners.

    Under a roughly $5 billion contract, the Dragon capsule has been the agency’s only U.S. vessel capable of carrying astronauts to and from the International Space Station, making Musk’s company a critical element of the U.S. space program.

    The feud raised questions about how far Trump, an often unpredictable force who has intervened in past procurement efforts, would go to punish Musk, who until last week headed Trump’s initiative to downsize the federal government.

    If the president prioritized political retaliation and canceled billions of dollars of SpaceX contracts with NASA and the Pentagon, it could slow U.S. space progress.

    NASA press secretary Bethany Stevens declined to comment on SpaceX, but said: “We will continue to work with our industry partners to ensure the president’s objectives in space are met.”

    Musk and Trump’s tussle ruptured an extraordinary relationship between a U.S. president and industry titan that had yielded some key favors for SpaceX: a proposed overhaul of NASA’s moon program into a Mars program, a planned effort to build a gigantic missile defense shield in space, and the naming of an Air Force leader who favored SpaceX in a contract award.

    Taking Dragon out of service would likely disrupt the ISS program, which involves dozens of countries under a two-decade-old international agreement. But it was unclear how quickly such a decommissioning would occur. NASA uses Russia’s Soyuz spacecraft as a secondary ride for its astronauts to the ISS.

    SPACEX’S RISE

    SpaceX rose to dominance long before Musk’s foray into Republican politics last year, building formidable market share in the rocket launch and satellite communications industries that could shield it somewhat from Musk’s split with Trump, analysts said.

    “It fortunately wouldn’t be catastrophic, since SpaceX has developed itself into a global powerhouse that dominates most of the space industry, but there’s no question that it would result in significant lost revenue and missed contract opportunities,” said Justus Parmar, CEO of SpaceX investor Fortuna Investments.

    Under Trump in recent months, the U.S. space industry and NASA’s workforce of 18,000 have been whipsawed by looming layoffs and proposed budget cuts that would cancel dozens of science programs, while the U.S. space agency remains without a confirmed administrator.

    Trump’s nominee for NASA administrator, Musk ally and billionaire private astronaut Jared Isaacman, appeared to be an early casualty of Musk’s rift with the president when the White House abruptly removed him from consideration over the weekend, denying Musk his pick to lead the space agency.

    Trump on Thursday explained dumping Isaacman by saying he was “totally Democrat,” in an apparent reference to reports Isaacman had donated to Democrats. Isaacman has donated to some Republican but mostly Democratic candidates for office, according to public records.

    Musk’s quest to send humans to Mars has been a critical element of Trump’s space agenda. The effort has threatened to take resources away from NASA’s flagship effort to send humans back to the moon.

    Trump’s budget plan sought to cancel Artemis moon missions beyond its third mission, effectively ending the over-budget Space Launch System rocket used for those missions.

    But the Senate Commerce Committee version of Trump’s bill released late on Thursday would restore funding for missions four and five, providing at least $1 billion annually for SLS through 2029.

    Since SpaceX’s rockets are a less expensive alternative to SLS, whether the Trump administration opposes the Senate’s changes in the coming weeks will give an indication of Musk’s remaining political power.

    SpaceX, founded in 2002, has won $15 billion of contracts from NASA for the company’s Falcon 9 rockets and development of SpaceX’s Starship, a multipurpose rocket system tapped to land NASA astronauts on the moon this decade.

    The company has also been awarded billions of dollars to launch a majority of the Pentagon’s national security satellites into space while it builds a massive spy satellite constellation in orbit for a U.S. intelligence agency.

    In addition to not being in U.S. interests, former NASA Deputy Administrator Lori Garver said canceling SpaceX’s contracts would probably not be legal.

    But she also added, “A rogue CEO threatening to decommission spacecraft, putting astronauts’ lives at risk, is untenable.”

    (Reuters) 

  • MIL-Evening Report: ‘Godfather of AI’ now fears it’s unsafe. He has a plan to rein it in

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Armin Chitizadeh, Lecturer, School of Computer Science, University of Sydney

    fran_kie/Shutterstock

    This week the US Federal Bureau of Investigation revealed two men suspected of bombing a fertility clinic in California last month allegedly used artificial intelligence (AI) to obtain bomb-making instructions. The FBI did not disclose the name of the AI program in question.

    This brings into sharp focus the urgent need to make AI safer. Currently we are living in the “wild west” era of AI, where companies are fiercely competing to develop the fastest and most entertaining AI systems. Each company wants to outdo competitors and claim the top spot. This intense competition often leads to intentional or unintentional shortcuts – especially when it comes to safety.

    Coincidentally, at around the same time of the FBI’s revelation, one of the godfathers of modern AI, Canadian computer science professor Yoshua Bengio, launched a new nonprofit organisation dedicated to developing a new AI model specifically designed to be safer than other AI models – and target those that cause social harm.

    So what is Bengio’s new AI model? And will it actually protect the world from AI-faciliated harm?

    An ‘honest’ AI

    In 2018, Bengio, alongside his colleagues Yann LeCun and Geoffrey Hinton, won the Turing Award for groundbreaking research they had published three years earlier on deep learning. A branch of machine learning, deep learning attempts to mimic the processes of the human brain by using artificial neural networks to learn from computational data and make predictions.

    Bengio’s new nonprofit organisation, LawZero, is developing “Scientist AI”. Bengio has said this model will be “honest and not deceptive”, and incorporate safety-by-design principles.

    According to a preprint paper released online earlier this year, Scientist AI will differ from current AI systems in two key ways.

    First, it can assess and communicate its confidence level in its answers, helping to reduce the problem of AI giving overly confident and incorrect responses.

    Second, it can explain its reasoning to humans, allowing its conclusions to be evaluated and tested for accuracy.

    Interestingly, older AI systems had this feature. But in the rush for speed and new approaches, many modern AI models can’t explain their decisions. Their developers have sacrificed explainability for speed.

    Bengio also intends “Scientist AI” to act as a guardrail against unsafe AI. It could monitor other, less reliable and harmful AI systems — essentially fighting fire with fire.

    This may be the only viable solution to improve AI safety. Humans cannot properly monitor systems such as ChatGPT, which handle over a billion queries daily. Only another AI can manage this scale.

    Using an AI system against other AI systems is not just a sci-fi concept – it’s a common practice in research to compare and test different level of intelligence in AI systems.

    Adding a ‘world model’

    Large language models and machine learning are just small parts of today’s AI landscape.

    Another key addition Bengio’s team are adding to Scientist AI is the “world model” which brings certainty and explainability. Just as humans make decisions based on their understanding of the world, AI needs a similar model to function effectively.

    The absence of a world model in current AI models is clear.

    One well-known example is the “hand problem”: most of today’s AI models can imitate the appearance of hands but cannot replicate natural hand movements, because they lack an understanding of the physics — a world model — behind them.

    Another example is how models such as ChatGPT struggle with chess, failing to win and even making illegal moves.

    This is despite simpler AI systems, which do contain a model of the “world” of chess, beating even the best human players.

    These issues stem from the lack of a foundational world model in these systems, which are not inherently designed to model the dynamics of the real world.

    Yoshua Bengio is recognised as one of the godfathers of AI.
    Alex Wong/Getty Images

    On the right track – but it will be bumpy

    Bengio is on the right track, aiming to build safer, more trustworthy AI by combining large language models with other AI technologies.

    However, his journey isn’t going to be easy. LawZero’s US$30 million in funding is small compared to efforts such as the US$500 billion project announced by US President Donald Trump earlier this year to accelerate the development of AI.

    Making LawZero’s task harder is the fact that Scientist AI – like any other AI project – needs huge amounts of data to be powerful, and most data are controlled by major tech companies.

    There’s also an outstanding question. Even if Bengio can build an AI system that does everything he says it can, how is it going to be able to control other systems that might be causing harm?

    Still, this project, with talented researchers behind it, could spark a movement toward a future where AI truly helps humans thrive. If successful, it could set new expectations for safe AI, motivating researchers, developers, and policymakers to prioritise safety.

    Perhaps if we had taken similar action when social media first emerged, we would have a safer online environment for young people’s mental health. And maybe, if Scientist AI had already been in place, it could have prevented people with harmful intentions from accessing dangerous information with the help of AI systems.

    Armin Chitizadeh does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. ‘Godfather of AI’ now fears it’s unsafe. He has a plan to rein it in – https://theconversation.com/godfather-of-ai-now-fears-its-unsafe-he-has-a-plan-to-rein-it-in-258288

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • Trump, Musk feud explodes with threats of cutting contracts, backing impeachment

    Source: Government of India

    Source: Government of India (4)

    President Donald Trump threatened on Thursday to cut off government contracts with billionaire Elon Musk’s companies, while Musk suggested Trump should be impeached, turning their bromance into an all-out brawl on social media.

    The hostilities began when Trump criticized Tesla CEO Musk in the Oval Office. Within hours, the once-close relationship had disintegrated in full public view, as the world’s most powerful man and its richest launched personal barbs at one another on Trump’s Truth Social and Musk’s X.

    “The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon’s Governmental Subsidies and Contracts,” Trump posted on Truth Social.

    Wall Street traders dumped shares of Musk’s electric vehicle maker and Tesla closed down 14.3%, losing about $150 billion in market value. It was Tesla’s largest single-day decline in value in its history.

    Minutes after the closing bell, Musk replied, “Yes,” to a post on X saying Trump should be impeached. Trump’s Republicans hold majorities in both chambers of Congress and are highly unlikely to impeach him.

    The trouble between the two started brewing days ago, when Musk denounced Trump’s sweeping tax-cut and spending bill. The president initially held his tongue while Musk campaigned to torpedo the bill, saying it would add too much to the nation’s $36.2 trillion in debt.

    Trump broke his silence on Thursday, telling reporters in the Oval Office he was “very disappointed” in Musk.

    “Look, Elon and I had a great relationship. I don’t know if we will anymore,” Trump said.

    While Trump spoke, Musk responded with increasingly acerbic posts on X.

    “Without me, Trump would have lost the election,” wrote Musk, who spent nearly $300 million backing Trump and other Republicans in last year’s election. “Such ingratitude.”

    In another post, Musk asserted that Trump’s signature tariffs would push the U.S. into a recession later this year.

    Besides Tesla, Musk’s businesses include rocket company and government contractor SpaceX and its satellite unit Starlink.

    Musk, whose space business plays a critical role in the U.S. government’s space program, said that as a result of Trump’s threats he would begin decommissioning SpaceX’s Dragon spacecraft. Dragon is the only U.S. spacecraft currently capable of sending astronauts to the International Space Station.

    Hours later, Musk appeared to reverse that move. Responding to a follower on X urging Musk and Trump to “cool off and take a step back for a couple of days,” Musk wrote: “Good advice. Ok, we won’t decommission Dragon.”

    In another possible sign of de-escalation on Thursday evening, Musk separately posted, “You’re not wrong,” in response to hedge fund manager Bill Ackman saying Trump and Musk should make peace.

    PUGILISTIC PAIR

    The feud was not entirely unexpected. Trump and Musk are both political pugilists with sizable egos and a penchant for using social media to punch back against their perceived enemies, and many observers had predicted an eventual falling out.

    Even before Musk’s departure from the administration last week, his influence had waned following a series of clashes with cabinet members over his cuts to their agencies.

    For Trump, the fight was the first major rift he has had with a top adviser since taking office for a second time, after his first term was marked by numerous blow-ups.

    Trump parted ways with multiple chiefs of staff, national security advisers and political strategists during his 2017-2021 White House tenure. A few, like Steve Bannon, remained in his good graces, while many others, like U.N. Ambassador John Bolton, became loud and vocal critics.

    After serving as the biggest Republican donor in the 2024 campaign season, Musk became one of Trump’s most visible advisers as head of the Department of Government Efficiency, which mounted a sweeping and controversial effort to downsize the federal workforce and slash spending.

    Musk was frequently present at the White House and made multiple appearances on Capitol Hill, sometimes carrying his young son.

    Only six days before Thursday’s blowup, Trump and Musk held an appearance in the Oval Office where Trump praised Musk’s government service and both men promised to continue working together.

    A prolonged feud between Trump and Musk could make it more difficult for Republicans to keep control of Congress in next year’s midterm elections. In addition to his campaign spending, Musk has a huge online following and helped connect Trump to parts of Silicon Valley and wealthy donors.

    Musk had already said he planned to curtail his political spending in the future.

    Soon after Trump’s Oval Office comments on Thursday, Musk polled his 220 million followers on X: “Is it time to create a new political party in America that actually represents the 80% in the middle?”

    ‘KILL THE BILL’

    Musk targeted what Trump has named his “big, beautiful bill” this week, calling it a “disgusting abomination” that would deepen the federal deficit. His attacks amplified a rift within the Republican Party that could threaten the bill’s prospects in the Senate.

    Nonpartisan analysts say Trump’s bill could add $2.4 trillion to $5 trillion to the nation’s $36.2 trillion in debt.

    Trump asserted that Musk’s true objection was the bill’s elimination of consumer tax credits for electric vehicles. The president also suggested that Musk was upset because he missed working for the White House.

    “He’s not the first,” Trump said on Thursday. “People leave my administration… then at some point they miss it so badly, and some of them embrace it and some of them actually become hostile.”

    Musk wrote on X, “KILL the BILL,” adding he was fine with Trump’s planned cuts to EV credits as long as Republicans rid the bill of “mountain of disgusting pork” or wasteful spending.

    He also pulled up past quotes from Trump decrying the level of federal spending, adding, “Where is this guy today?”

    Musk came into government with brash plans to cut $2 trillion from the federal budget. He left last week having cut only about half of 1% of total spending while causing disruption across multiple agencies.

    Musk’s increasing focus on politics provoked widespread protests at Tesla sites in the U.S. and Europe, driving down sales while investors fretted that Musk’s attention was too divided.

    (Reuters)

  • MIL-OSI Russia: Harvard University files lawsuit against US ban on foreign students

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: People’s Republic of China in Russian – People’s Republic of China in Russian –

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    NEW YORK, June 5 (Xinhua) — Harvard University on Thursday appealed in federal court a ban on foreign students entering the United States who plan to study there.

    The lawsuit was filed less than 24 hours after U.S. President Donald Trump issued a proclamation banning foreign nationals from entering Harvard. The university argues that the administration’s actions are intended to circumvent an earlier court ruling that stripped the Department of Homeland Security of the ability to bar Harvard from admitting foreign students.

    “Thus, the President’s actions are not taken to protect the ‘interests of the United States,’ but to further the government’s vendetta against Harvard,” the lawsuit says.

    “The special treatment given to our institution in terms of admitting international students and collaborating with other educational institutions around the world is yet another illegal step taken by the administration to get even with Harvard,” Harvard University President Alan Garber said in a statement after the lawsuit was filed.

    He added that the university is developing “contingency plans” to ensure that international students and scholars can continue their studies and work at Harvard this summer and into the next academic year. –0–

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI USA: On World Environment Day, Senators Markey, Duckworth, Booker Underscore How Recent Attacks on the National Environmental Policy Act Threaten Public Health and the Environment

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Massachusetts Ed Markey

    Washington (June 5, 2025) – Today, on World Environment Day, Senators Edward J. Markey (D-Mass.), Tammy Duckworth (D-Ill.), and Cory Booker (D-N.J.), co-chairs of the Senate Environmental Justice Caucus, released the following statement after a slew of recent actions that drastically undermine the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the country’s bedrock environmental law.

    “Between the recent actions by the Trump administration to severely limit the timing of environmental reviews, the Supreme Court’s decision narrowing the scope of environmental reviews, and Republicans’ Big Billionaire Bonus bill that creates a pay to play scheme—industry will have a free pass from all three branches of government to skirt the law that keeps our communities and planet healthy. Instead of gutting a seminal environmental law and cutting agency funding to implement it, we should be investing resources and personnel to more quickly conduct meaningful environmental reviews. Republicans in both chambers are fulfilling Trump’s wish to completely dismantle the safeguards that allow for well-informed federal decision-making—putting the American public, our wildlife, the health of our natural landscapes, and our collective livable future at risk.”

    Since January 2025, enforcement and implementation of NEPA has been subject to attacks from all three branches of government:

    Trump Administration

    The Trump administration has cut federal employees and funding intended for expedited yet meaningful NEPA reviews.

    • On May 23, the administration rubberstamped a mine in just 11 days despite similar projects with complex proposals typically taking two years to meaningfully review, and
    • On May 28, Trump appointed the architect of the provisions that severely limited the timing of NEPA reviews in the Fiscal Responsibility Act to head the Permitting Council (formerly the Federal Permitting Improvement Steering Council).

    Supreme Court

    The Supreme Court unanimously limited the scope of environmental reviews required by NEPA on May 29.

    Congress

    House and Senate Republicans proposed budget reconciliation text that:

    • Would allow project sponsors to pay for preferential treatment in NEPA environmental review processes and prohibit judicial review of environmental findings for these projects, and
    • Would repeal and rescind environmental review funding for the Environmental Protection Agency, Council on Environmental Quality, and state and local permitting authorities that would have enabled more efficient, accurate, and timely reviews under NEPA.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI China: Trump orders vast inquiry into Biden’s health

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    U.S. President Donald Trump on Wednesday signed a memorandum ordering an investigation into whether former President Joe Biden’s staff conspired to hide information about his health and whether an autopen was used to sign executive documents without Biden’s knowledge.

    “In recent months, it has become increasingly apparent that former President Biden’s aides abused the power of Presidential signatures through the use of an autopen to conceal Biden’s cognitive decline,” Trump wrote in the memorandum. “This conspiracy marks one of the most dangerous and concerning scandals in American history.”

    The memorandum continued. “There are serious doubts as to the decision-making process and even the degree of Biden’s awareness of these actions being taken in his name,” it said.

    The vast majority of Biden’s executive actions were signed using a mechanical signature pen, often called an autopen, as opposed to Biden’s own hand, it said.

    The memorandum orders that the Counsel to the President, in consultation with the Attorney General and the head of any other relevant executive department or agency, investigate whether certain individuals conspired to deceive the public about Biden’s mental state and unconstitutionally exercise the authorities and responsibilities of the President.

    In a statement late on Wednesday, Biden dismissed those suggestions.

    “Let me be clear: I made the decisions during my presidency. I made the decisions about the pardons, executive orders, legislation, and proclamations. Any suggestion that I didn’t is ridiculous and false.”

    Biden called the move “a distraction by Donald Trump and Congressional Republicans who are working to push disastrous legislation that would cut essential programs like Medicaid and raise costs on American families, all to pay for tax breaks for the ultra-wealthy and big corporations.”

    The Republican-controlled U.S. House of Representatives narrowly passed a sweeping tax and spending bill, described by Trump as the “One, Big, Beautiful Bill.” The legislative package includes tax cuts and spending cuts, no tax on tips and overtime, increased child tax credits, and measures to reduce the federal deficit. 

    MIL OSI China News

  • MIL-OSI USA: News 06/5/2025 Blackburn, Colleagues Introduce Bill Backed by White House to Expedite Removal of Illegal Aliens from United States

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn)
    WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, U.S. Senators Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.), Ted Budd (R-N.C.), and Ashley Moody (R-Fla.) introduced the Rapid Expulsion of Migrant Offenders who Violate and Evade (REMOVE) Act to conclude removal proceedings for illegal aliens within 15 days after such proceedings are commenced, empowering the Trump administration to expedite deportations: 

    Click here to download video of Senator Blackburn speaking about her REMOVE Act.
    “Under Joe Biden’s failed leadership, we saw the largest wave of illegal immigration in our nation’s history, forcing communities across Tennessee and America to bear the consequences,” said Senator Blackburn. “With a record number of illegal aliens now living in the United States, President Trump must have every tool necessary to remove them quickly from our country. Our REMOVE Act would require these illegal aliens to begin removal proceedings within 15 days of a Notice to Appear being served.” 
    “Under the Biden Administration, the American people witnessed a full-scale invasion of our country that directly threatened our national security and sovereignty. With untold millions of illegal aliens in the U.S. due to Democrats’ open-border policies, we must take strong, decisive measures to remove those who have been ordered to be removed from the United States,” said Stephen Miller, Assistant to the President and Deputy Chief of Staff for Policy and Homeland Security Advisor. “The REMOVE Act is critical legislation that will help us fulfill our mass deportation operation and get gang members, cartels, and violent criminals off the streets. Passing this legislation, in conjunction with the largest mass deportation investment in American history provided by our One Big Beautiful Bill, will ensure we permanently secure the border. Thank you to Senator Blackburn for her leadership.” 
    “Under the Biden administration’s watch, millions of illegal aliens entered our country, compromising our national security and overwhelming our communities,” said Senator Budd.“Now, President Trump is stepping in to restore order. I’m proud to stand with Senator Blackburn and my colleagues to fast-track the removal of those who have been ordered to be removed. It’s time we uphold the integrity of our immigration system to protect our nation.”
    “Joe Biden’s dereliction of duty with regard to the southern border allowed dangerous criminals to invade every state across this nation. President Trump has acted quickly and successfully in reversing Biden’s failures, but there is still so much to do. This legislation is critical to build upon those early successes and allow for the prompt removal of aliens who have already been ordered removed,” said Senator Moody.
    This legislation is also cosponsored by Senator Ted Cruz (R-Texas). 
    Under the failed leadership of the Biden administration, over 10 million illegal aliens crossed America’s borders, including roughly two million known “gotaways.” As of a March 2025 report, it is estimated that at least 18.6 million illegal aliens now reside in the United States. Foreign gangs like Tren de Aragua and MS-13 have spread across the United States, including in Tennessee.
    Last year, an illegal alien from Mexico was charged with criminal homicide and evidence tampering after Nashville restaurant owner, Matt Carney, was tragically killed in a hit-and-run crash. Just a few months earlier, another illegal alien was charged with attempted kidnapping, sexual battery, public intoxication, and evading arrest he followed a woman into the bathroom and groped her at the Nashville Sundae Club in the Gulch.
    President Trump vowed to carry out the largest deportation operation in American history to make the country safer.
    Click here for a list of examples of the criminal illegal aliens who were arrested during a joint operation in Nashville by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and the Tennessee Highway Patrol. Senator Blackburn praised this operation in a column published by The Tennessean.
     THE REMOVE ACT
    The REMOVE Act would require the timely removal proceedings of illegal aliens who have been served with a Notice to Appear.
    Under this legislation, the U.S. Attorney General would be required to conclude removal proceedings for illegal aliens within 15 days after such proceedings are commenced. 
    Click here for bill text.
    RELATED

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Sen. Cortez Masto, Rep. Gomez Demand Answers from Trump Administration on Mishandling of Special Immigrant Juvenile Status Program, Push for New Way Forward

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Nevada Cortez Masto
    Washington, D.C. – Today, U.S. Senator Catherine Cortez Masto (D-Nev.) and Congressman Jimmy Gomez (D-Calif.-34) led 17 of their colleagues in a letter to U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Kristi Noem and Acting U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) Director Kika Scott demanding the Trump Administration provide answers on the changes it has made in determining deferred action for youth with Special Immigrant Juvenile Status (SIJS). The Members also express concern that these changes leave SIJS youth vulnerable to exploitation and deportation.
    “We write to express our concern regarding recent changes seen in determinations of deferred action for youth with special immigrant juvenile status (SIJS), and to request further information about SIJS deferred action policy and adjudications,” wrote the Members. “Since early April, SIJS recipients have been receiving SIJS approval notices without deferred action determinations. This leaves abused and abandoned youth in legal limbo while heightening their vulnerability to exploitation.”
    Created in 1990, SIJS provides permanent protection to immigrant children who have survived parental abuse, abandonment, neglect, or similar harms and for whom it would be dangerous to return to their home country. Since 2022, youth with SIJS have also received a deferred action designation, allowing them to legally work and avoid the danger of deportation while waiting to apply for lawful permanent residency. There has been a backlog of applications for permanent residency since April 2016.
    “In the absence of a durable solution to the SIJS backlog, we believe it is critical that USCIS continue to consider every approved SIJS petitioner for deferred action,” continued the Members. “Additionally, we are deeply concerned by reports from practitioners of increased occurrences of detention and deportation of SIJS recipients, with ICE acting to strip SIJS youth of deferred action upon detaining them. Barring other circumstances, seeking removal of SIJS youth who are awaiting visa availability is in direct contravention of congressional intent for the program.”
    In addition to their letter, Senator Cortez Masto introduced the Protect Vulnerable Immigrant Youth Act to fix the Special Immigrant Juvenile Status (SIJS) program. This legislation would exempt SIJS children from annual employment-based visa caps, ending years-long case backlogs and allowing these children to move forward with their lives as lawful permanent residents of the United States. Congressman Gomez introduced companion legislation in the House of Representatives.
    Read the full letter here and the bill here. Additional signatories to the letter include Senators Mazie Hirono (D-Hawaii), Alex Padilla (D-Calif.), Jacky Rosen (D-Nev.), Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), and Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), as well as Representatives Yvette Clarke (D-N.Y.-09), Danny Davis (D-Ill.-07), Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.-07), Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.-18), Jim McGovern (D-Mass.-02), Luz Rivas (D-Calif.-29), Jan Schakowsky (D-Ill.-09), Lateefah Simon (D-Calif.-12), Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.-12), Paul Tonko (D-N.Y.-20), Juan Vargas (D-Calif.-52), and Nydia Velazquez (D-N.Y.-07).
    The first and only Latina senator, Senator Cortez Masto has consistently supported immigrant communities in Nevada, calling on both administrations to protect TPS holders and other immigrants, as well as leading commonsense legislation to fix our broken immigration system. Cortez Masto joined Senator Rosen (D-Nev.) in introducing the Born in the USA Act to effectively block the implementation of President Trump’s unconstitutional Executive Order attempting to end automatic citizenship for children born in the United States. She has worked to pass meaningful immigration reform that balances critical border security measures with a path to citizenship for Dreamers, TPS holders, and essential workers.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Senator Murray Statement on Trump Travel Ban

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Washington State Patty Murray

    Washington, D.C. – Today, U.S. Senator Patty Murray (D-WA), Vice Chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee, issued the following statement in response to President Trump’s sweeping travel ban on 12 countries and other travel restrictions announced yesterday:

    “President Trump’s travel ban is not about making our country safer, it’s about slamming the door shut to vulnerable refugees and asylum seekers for no reason other than that Trump doesn’t like their race or religion.

    “Blanket travel bans arbitrarily discriminate and punish people who are seeking to enter our country legally, including Afghans fleeing the Taliban, and people seeking to reunite with their loved ones who are already in our country.

    “This divisive ban is an affront to our values and a desperate attempt to change the subject as the Trump administration is driving up prices with reckless tariffs and putting health care for 16 million Americans who rely on Medicaid and the Affordable Care Act on the chopping block.”

    Senator Murray is a cosponsor of the National Origin-Based Antidiscrimination for Nonimmigrants (NO BAN) Act, introduced in February to prevent future bans by the Trump administration on Muslims or any other religious group by strengthening the Immigration and Nationality Act to prohibit discrimination based on religion.

    In President Trump’s first term, Senator Murray cosponsored multiple bills to block President Trump’s discriminatory travel ban on Muslim-majority countries and its various subsequent iterations.  

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Senator Murray, State Sen. Riccelli, MultiCare CEO & Local Providers Raise Alarm Over Republican Health Care Cuts in Eastern and Central WA

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Washington State Patty Murray

    NEW: 16 million could lose health insurance under GOP bill, CBO finds

    ***WATCH FULL PRESS CONFERENCE HERE; DOWNLOAD HERE***

    Washington, D.C. — Today, U.S. Senator Patty Murray (D-WA), Vice Chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee, hosted a virtual press conference laying out how the budget reconciliation bill that Republicans passed through the House of Representatives on May 22nd  will be devastating for Washington state’s health care system and the 1.9 million people across Washington state who rely on Apple Health, as well as the more than 270,000 Washingtonians who access coverage through the state’s Affordable Care Act marketplace, Washington Healthplanfinder. Joining Senator Murray for the press conference were Washington State Senator Marcus Riccelli (LD-3), MultiCare Inland Northwest and Yakima Senior Vice President Alex Jackson, Navigation and Engagement Supervisor at Yakima Neighborhood Health Services, Alex Cordova, and Julie Sparkman, a home care provider in Spokane and member of SEIU 775.  

    The Republican legislation would cut more than $1 trillion from America’s health care system and is the largest cut to Medicaid in history. Updated estimates released yesterday by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) found that Republicans’ legislation will kick 16 million people off their health insurance—between the drastic cuts to Medicaid and the sabotage of the Affordable Care Act and refusal to expand tax credits Democrats passed to lower health insurance premiums. Among other things, Republicans’ bill would institute work reporting requirements for Medicaid, which have been proven not to increase employment and just strip health care coverage from people who are already working or exempt—this would put more than 620,000 Washingtonians at risk of losing their health care coverage or having it delayed because of a wall of new paperwork. Republicans’ reconciliation bill also includes a provision to defund Planned Parenthood, threatening the closure of up to 200 health centers. Republicans are advancing the legislation through the budget reconciliation process, which only requires a simple majority to pass in both chambers of Congress.

    “I can’t emphasize this enough: the Republican bill is nothing short of a catastrophe for health care in America. And this legislation would be a massive hit to our state’s budget. One estimate from KFF found that Washington state would lose around $32 billion in federal Medicaid spending over the next 10 years. There is just no way our state would be able to make up that shortfall,” Senator Murray said on the press call today. “The Republican tax bill will strangle everyone who relies on Medicaid in red tape, creating more barriers to coverage through intentionally confusing and burdensome new work reporting requirements that could leave more than 620,000 Washingtonians without health coverage or delayed coverage. The vast majority of people on Medicaid are already working—this bill is just a scam by Republicans to make it so hard to qualify for Medicaid that people just give up. And again, this bill will mean higher costs and less access to health care for everyone—not just people on Medicaid or the ACA…My office has been flooded with calls and emails from people who are terrified about what the cuts in this bill would mean for them and their families.”

    “So, here’s my message to everyone today: this is not over. We can kill this bill. It won’t be easy, but we have to fight, and we have to try,” Senator Murray continued. “In 2017, Americans across the country spoke out, got loud, took to the streets, and the wave of public outcry we created ultimately killed Republicans’ first attempt at ACA repeal…Republicans in Congress are not immune to public pressure, and neither is this Administration. Your voice matters. Whatever you can do to speak up—please do it. And for my part, I will not be quiet. I will keep sounding the alarm every way I can, talking to my colleagues, and lifting up the stories of people who would be hurt by this bill.”

    The Joint Economic Committee estimated last month that at least 274,000 people in Washington state would lose their health insurance under the Republican plan. Communities in Central and Eastern Washington are among the most reliant on Medicaid and the two Congressional Districts in Washington state with the most people enrolled in Medicaid (known as Apple Health in Washington state) are WA-04 and WA-05. In Washington’s 4th District, 38 percent of the population (300,511 people) rely on Medicaid, including 70 percent of kids. In Washington’s 5th District, 30 percent of the population (237,567 people), including 56 percent of kids, rely on the program.

    “For people in Spokane and across Washington State, these proposed federal Medicaid cuts represent a real threat to basic health, access to care, and financial stability,” said Washington State Senator Marcus Riccelli (LD-3). “There is no doubt this legislation will force many of our rural hospitals and clinics to close and lead to increased wait times and reduced services in urban areas, like I represent. It’s clear many people in Spokane and Washington will face unneeded health risks and suffering…In Spokane County, over 35 percent of the population is covered by Medicaid. Pulling the rug from underneath thousands of people in my community and across our state, and across this country, will mean a loss of comprehensive services to people. This means reducing or eliminating access to primary care, behavioral health, and dental care. This means delaying care. This means floods of people ending up in the emergency room that did not have to be there…And let’s be clear, the more people that end up in our hospital systems, the more expensive it will be on our already overburdened system…Working families will face significant costs to treat chronic illness or a trip to emergency room, which is already overwhelming enough…Six in ten Washington adults already say they can’t pay an unexpected medical bill, and three in 10 Washington residents say they live in a household with medical debt already, even with insurance. Can you imagine if these cuts happen, if you’re even able to find care, now what you’d be faced with?”

    “From a patient’s perspective, the biggest concerns about the [One Big Beautiful Bill] Act are the numerous provisions that will make it harder for patients to get health insurance coverage and keep that coverage. Some of those barriers include: a shortened enrollment period; requirements to purchase insurance via the Health Benefits Exchange every year—right now, patients are automatically re-enrolled; requirements to verify individuals on Medicaid expansion every six months; requirements for those in the expansion population to verify work status, again, every six months,” said Alex Jackson, Senior Vice President and Chief Executive for MultiCare Inland Northwest and Yakima. “When people lose their coverage, their medical needs don’t go away. In fact, look at health insurance coverage—the lack of health insurance coverage can end up exacerbating those needs, as patients without insurance genuinely don’t receive the preventive care that they desperately need that keep patients and populations healthy. Patients may even ration food or skip medication altogether. All this adds up to patients who, when they do seek care, will require higher level care—which is also more expensive. In addition, they often enter the healthcare system through an emergency department…putting increased stress, not only on them, but on other patients in emergency department care as well. In accordance with our mission in MultiCare, we provide care for all who need it, any day, any hour of the day as well, irregardless of their ability to pay. When patients lose access to health insurance, health systems like MultiCare will have no choice but to care for those patients and absorb the increased costs associated with providing uncompensated care—creating a financially unintentional and unsustainable situation for health systems. Ultimately, we may have to cut services, causing entire communities to lose important access to care. For smaller hospitals and health systems, particularly those in rural areas that have already been mentioned today, they have may have no choice but to close their doors entirely, leaving those communities without access to even seeking our services like an emergency department. And not only that, it will also close, likely, the largest employer in that community as well.”

    “We provide 150,000 visits every year to the working poor in our communities. Last year, we provided over 90,000 visits to patients on Medicaid and Qualified Health Plan insurances. We estimate about one-third of our patients will lose their health coverage, not because they are not eligible, but because of the heavy administrative burdens, or because less of the subsidies will make their coverage unaffordable. Our community health center has been a navigator lead organization since 2014, the beginning of the Affordable Care Act. Our navigators cover 6,600 square miles, mostly rural, between Yakima and Kittitas County. We have completed over 200,000 Medicaid and health benefit exchange applications during that time, we have heard a lot of family stories about what makes health care accessible and affordable,” said Alex Cordova, Navigation and Engagement Supervisor at Yakima Neighborhood Health Services. “Most of our help has gone to helping people apply for Medicaid, and if they make just too much money for Medicaid, then we have looked at their options through the exchange products. Most of the people we have are working, disabled, or have children at home they are caring for. We are really worried about [what] the proposed changes will do for our families, and so are they. Recently, we had a family of five, parent working as a construction worker. Their children did qualify for Apple Health. Unfortunately, the parents did not—they were a little bit over income by like $150. Then we did have them explore the insurances through the exchange, but they were grateful for the help, but they were just worried that losing subsidies will make it harder for them to have insurance in the future. We also see…a lot of clients with Medicaid coming in, and they are quite fearful for the future. They ask, what’s going on, what’s going to happen to my coverage? How is that going to affect my family? So, just right now, open enrollment is from November 1st to January 15th, but the exchanges are going to shorten the open enrollment period by a month. And right now, also losing tax credits is going to make it harder for families to get insurance through the exchange. So, we’re supposed to be moving forward, not backwards.”

    “Almost exactly two years ago, my grandson Magnus was in a horrific car accident just outside Liberty Lake. He was only four months old. One moment he was smiling and babbling, and the next, he was being rushed by ambulance to Sacred Heart, fighting for his life. By the time my daughter and I arrived at the hospital, Magnus was already in the Pediatric ICU. He had suffered internal injuries, three skull fractures, and multiple brain bleeds. The doctors told us the chances of survival were almost none, to prepare for end-of-life care. Those were the worst three days of my life. I lived them five minutes at a time. I didn’t want to step away—not to eat, not even to go to the bathroom—because I was terrified, he wouldn’t be there when I got back. But Magnus made it. He spent a month in the PICU. And what saved him wasn’t luck. It was the infrastructure. It was the ambulance, the ICU, the trained doctors and nurses, the machines keeping him alive—and every bit of it supported by Medicaid,” Julie Sparkman, Spokane home care provider and member of SEIU 775. “This is what’s at stake. When people talk about cutting Medicaid, especially in rural areas, they’re talking about shutting down hospitals, losing emergency care, and removing access to life-saving treatment. Magnus didn’t have time to be transferred. If the nearest hospital had been hours away—he wouldn’t be here today…I support our family with my work as a home care provider. But here’s the truth: healthcare workers are going to leave the field. Caregivers like me are preparing to leaving this work. Not because we want to, but because we have bills, too. Rent, groceries, gas—it all keeps going up, but Medicaid funding has to be there for that program to remain. When Medicaid is cut by hundreds of billions of dollars, caregivers lose hours, wages get cut, and benefits disappear. Many of us simply won’t be able to stay in this work, even though we love it—because love doesn’t pay the electric bill. And when we leave, it’s not just a workforce problem. It’s a care crisis. Clients go without support, families burn out, and rural communities are left behind. None of this is theoretical. Accidents happen. Illness happens. Aging happens.  Emergencies don’t care where you live, or how far the nearest hospital is. And you don’t come out of an ICU by accident—it takes skilled people, working systems, and resources. We built this safety net for a reason—so people in crisis have somewhere to go, and someone to help them. We cannot abandon it now. We need to fight to protect Medicaid, protect our hospitals, and protect rural healthcare. Because no one should lose the person they love just because the care they needed was too far away or already gone.”

    Senator Murray’s full remarks, as delivered at today’s press conference, are below and video is HERE:

    “Thank you all for joining this call today.

    “We are here because right now in Congress, Republicans are ramming through a mega-bill that would gut health care access across the country—all so they can pay for tax handouts for billionaires.

    “This big, betrayal of a bill, which they are trying to get to President Trump’s desk before July 4th, would be a 1 trillion dollar hit to our health care system and the largest cut to Medicaid in history. Nearly 11 million people in America would lose their health care coverage, that’s nearly 8 million people getting kicked off Medicaid and another 3 million who would lose their Affordable Care Act Marketplace coverage.

    “Not only that, but Republicans are refusing to extend critical tax credits that lower people’s health insurance premiums—which will make another 4.2 million people lose coverage. And that will raise costs for everyone. People getting kicked off their health care, hospitals and nursing homes in our rural areas will shut down, small businesses no longer being able to afford to provide health care for their employees, and skyrocketing premiums for working and middle-class families.

    “I can’t emphasize this enough: the Republican bill is nothing short of a catastrophe for health care in America. And this legislation would be a massive hit to our state’s budget—one estimate from KFF found that Washington state would lose around $32 billion in federal Medicaid spending over the next 10 years. There is just no way our state would be able to make up that shortfall.  

    “The Republicans tax bill will strangle everyone who relies on Medicaid in red tape, creating more barriers to coverage through intentionally confusing and burdensome new work reporting requirements that could leave more than 620,000 Washingtonians without health care coverage or delayed coverage. The vast majority of people on Medicaid are already working—this bill is just a scam by Republicans to make it so hard to qualify for Medicaid that people just give up.

    “And again, this bill will mean higher costs, less access to health care for everyone—not just people on Medicaid or the ACA. And you know, that is especially true in our rural communities, which stand to be the hardest hit by this legislation. One analysis found that 700 rural hospitals across the country would be forced to close under this bill. You’ll hear more from Alex Jackson with MultiCare about how this bill would affect hospitals in Central and Eastern Washington.

    “Now my office has been flooded with calls and emails from people who are terrified about what the cuts in this bill would mean for them and their patients. An endocrinologist in Wenatchee wrote to tell me about how, after the ACA became law, they saw many new patients who had insurance for the first time in their adult life. These patients had been paying for expensive over-the-counter insulin, but under the ACA they were finally able to get better treatment with newer insulins and more advanced technology. They wrote: ‘If Medicaid cuts take away coverage for these patients, it will be like going back to the dark ages in terms of treatment.’

    “A doctor in Yakima wrote to tell me about one of their patients, an 82-year-old woman who has chronic pain and heart issues. Her Medicaid coverage pays for a caregiver, and it allows her to live at home relatively independently. Without Medicaid, all of that would fall away.

    “A doctor in Spokane wrote to tell me how many of their patients are already suffering extreme financial hardship. Many of them can barely scrape enough money together for their appointments, and that is with the current levels of Medicaid support. And they wrote: ‘these patients are our neighbors and community members—not criminal freeloaders as some people seem to believe.’

    “Another person from Spokane explained how cutting Medicaid—meaning more care goes uncompensated—will exacerbate the existing shortage of mental health care in Spokane County.

    “Now, Trump and his cabinet full of billionaires clearly don’t get it. But I have to say, for the life of me, I do not understand how some of the same Republicans who represent districts most reliant on Medicaid, ever looked at this bill, looked at what it would do to the people they serve, and said, ‘count me in!’

    “So, here’s my message to everyone today: this is not over. We can kill this bill. It won’t be easy, but we have to fight, and we have to try.

    “This bill is in the Senate now, and Republican senators are going to change it—which means if they can pass it, it will have to go back to the House again. In 2017, Americans across the country spoke out, they got loud, they took to the streets, and the wave of public outcry we created ultimately killed Republicans’ first attempt at ACA repeal. So, blocking this Health Care Heist is not out of reach.

    “Republicans in Congress are not immune to public pressure, and neither is this Administration. Your voice matters. Whatever you can do to speak up—please do it. For my part, I will not be quiet. I will keep sounding the alarm every way I can, talking to my colleagues, and lifting up the stories of people who would be hurt by this bill.

    “We have a big task in front of us, but we have stopped Republican health care repeal before, we can do it again.”

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-Evening Report: ER Report: A Roundup of Significant Articles on EveningReport.nz for June 6, 2025

    ER Report: Here is a summary of significant articles published on EveningReport.nz on June 6, 2025.

    Defections are fairly common in Australian politics. But history shows they are rarely a good career move
    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Frank Bongiorno, Professor of History, ANU College of Arts and Social Sciences, Australian National University For many years now, Australian political scientists have pointed out that that established partisan allegiance is in decline. In 1967, 36% of Coalition supporters and 32% of Labor voters reported lifetime voting

    Premature babies are given sucrose for pain relief – but new research shows it doesn’t stop long-term impacts on development
    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Mia Mclean, Senior lecturer, Auckland University of Technology Getty Images Infants born very preterm spend weeks or even months in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) while their immature brains are still developing. During this time, they receive up to 16 painful procedures every day. The most

    Spit or swallow? What’s the best way to deal with phlegm?
    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Niall Johnston, Conjoint Associate Lecturer, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW Sydney Pop Paul-Catalin/Shutterstock A spitting pot I consider as an essential part of the bed-room apparatus. That’s what French physician René Laennec wrote in 1821. Laennec, who invented the stethoscope, spent his days gazing at his patients’ phlegm.

    Australia is in the firing line of Trump’s looming ‘revenge tax’. It’s a fight we’re unlikely to win
    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Graeme Cooper, Professor of Taxation Law, University of Sydney Alexey_Arz/Shutterstock The Australian Labor Party just won an election victory for the ages. Now, it may be forced to walk back one of the key achievements of its first term. Here’s why: United States President Donald Trump is

    ‘HIV shouldn’t be death sentence in Fiji’ – call for testing amid outbreak
    By Christina Persico, RNZ Pacific bulletin editor Fiji’s Minister for Health and Medical Services has revealed the latest HIV numbers in the country to a development partner roundtable discussing the national response. The minister reported 490 new HIV cases between October and December last year, bringing the 2024 total to 1583. “Included in this number

    E-bikes and e-scooters are popular – but dangerous. A transport expert explains how to make them safer
    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Geoff Rose, Professor in Transport Engineering, Monash Institute of Transport Studies, Monash University nazar_ab/Getty Last weekend a pedestrian in Perth tragically died after being struck by an e-scooter. This followed the death of another person in Victoria last month who was hit and killed by a modified

    ‘There are too many unpleasant things in life without creating more’: why Impressionism is the world’s favourite art movement
    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Sasha Grishin, Adjunct Professor of Art History, Australian National University Installation view of French Impressionism from the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston on display from June 6 to October 5, at NGV International, Melbourne. Photo: Sean Fennessy Impressionism is the world’s favourite art movement. Impressionist paintings create

    ‘Deadly’ sports diplomacy: why Australia’s Indigenous people must be a part of our sports strategy
    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Stuart Murray, Associate Professor, International Relations and Diplomacy, Bond University Sean Garnsworthy/ALLSPORT Since coming to power in 2022, the Albanese government has focused strongly on the Indo-Pacific. The prime minister’s recent trip to Indonesia was the latest high-level bilateral summit as Australia seeks to recalibrate relationships, enhance

    Making it easier to build a granny flat makes sense – but it’s no solution to a housing crisis
    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Timothy Welch, Senior Lecturer in Urban Planning, University of Auckland, Waipapa Taumata Rau RyanJLane/Getty Images As part of its resource management reforms, the government will soon allow “super-sized granny flats” to be built without consent – potentially adding 13,000 dwellings over the next decade to provide “families

    Is black mould really as bad for us as we think? A toxicologist explains
    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Ian Musgrave, Senior lecturer in Pharmacology, University of Adelaide Peeradontax/Shutterstock Mould in houses is unsightly and may cause unpleasant odours. More important though, mould has been linked to a range of health effects – especially triggering asthma. However, is mould exposure linked to a serious lung disease

    Resident-to-resident aggression is common in nursing homes. Here’s how we can improve residents’ safety
    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Joseph Ibrahim, Professor, Aged Care Medical Research Australian Centre for Evidence Based Aged Care, La Trobe University Wbmul/Shutterstock The Coroners Court of Victoria is undertaking an inquest into the deaths of eight aged care residents across six facilities, over a nine-month period in 2021. Each death occurred

    We tracked 13,000 giants of the ocean over 30 years, to uncover their hidden highways
    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Ana M. M. Sequeira, Associate Professor, Research School of Biology, Australian National University Alexandra Vautin, Shutterstock Big animals of the ocean go about their days mostly hidden from view. Scientists know this marine megafauna – such as whales, sharks, seal, turtles and birds – travel vast distances

    ‘No one knew what was happening’: new research shows how domestic violence harms young people’s schooling
    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Steven Roberts, Professor of Education and Social Justice, Monash University Taiki Ishikawa/ Unsplash, CC BY Every school around Australia is almost certain to have students who are victim-survivors of family and domestic violence. The 2023 Australian Child Maltreatment Study found neglect and physical, sexual and emotional abuse

    Internal tensions throw PNG anti-corruption body into crisis
    By Scott Waide, RNZ Pacific PNG correspondent Three staffers from Papua New Guinea’s peak anti-corruption body are embroiled in a standoff that has brought into question the integrity of the organisation. Police Commissioner David Manning has confirmed that he received a formal complaint. Commissioner Manning said that initial inquiries were underway to inform the “sensitive

    Tasmania could go to an election just 16 months after its last one. What’s going on?
    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Robert Hortle, Deputy Director, Tasmanian Policy Exchange, University of Tasmania Tasmania’s Liberal government and its premier, Jeremy Rockliff, have come under huge pressure since the state budget was handed down last week. It’s culminated in the Tasmanian House of Assembly voting to pass a motion of no

    Grattan on Friday: Albanese will need some nuance in facing a female opposition leader
    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Michelle Grattan, Professorial Fellow, University of Canberra Anthony Albanese loves a trophy, especially a human one. He prides himself on his various “captain’s pick” candidates – good campaigners he has steered into seats. Way back in the Gillard days, he was key in persuading discontented Liberal Peter

    Punishment for Te Pāti Māori over Treaty haka stands – but MPs ‘will not be silenced’
    RNZ News Aotearoa New Zealand’s Parliament has confirmed the unprecedented punishments proposed for opposition indigenous Te Pāti Māori MPs who performed a haka in protest against the Treaty Principles Bill. Te Pāti Māori co-leaders Debbie Ngarewa-Packer and Rawiri Waititi will be suspended for 21 days, and MP Hana-Rawhiti Maipi-Clarke suspended for seven days, taking effect

    Virgin Australia is coming back to the share market. Here’s what this new chapter could mean
    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Rico Merkert, Professor in Transport and Supply Chain Management and Deputy Director, Institute of Transport and Logistics Studies (ITLS), University of Sydney Business School, University of Sydney Petr Podrouzek/Shutterstock It is finally happening. After five years of being a private company, Virgin Australia will relist on the

    GPs asking men about their behaviour in relationships could help reduce domestic violence
    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Kelsey Hegarty, Professor of Family Violence Prevention, The University of Melbourne Domestic violence is increasing in Australia. A new report shows one in three men have ever made a partner feel frightened or anxious. One in 11 have used physical violence when angry. And one in 50

    The Top End’s tropical savannas are a natural wonder – but weak environment laws mean their future is uncertain
    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Euan Ritchie, Professor in Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, School of Life & Environmental Sciences, Deakin University François Brassard The Top End of Australia’s Northern Territory contains an extensive, awe-inspiring expanse of tropical savanna landscapes. It includes well-known and much-loved regions such as Darwin, Kakadu National Park, Arnhem

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-OSI Russia: UN High Commissioner for Human Rights expresses concern over US travel ban from 12 countries

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: People’s Republic of China in Russian –

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    GENEVA, June 6 (Xinhua) — United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Turk on Thursday expressed concern over the new travel ban imposed by the United States.

    In a statement sent to Xinhua, he said the broad and comprehensive nature of the new restrictions raises concerns “from the perspective of international law.”

    According to F. Türk, although international law allows states to regulate their borders sovereignly, they “have an obligation to ensure equal protection of all persons before the law and to prevent discrimination on any grounds, including nationality, origin, religion, migration or other status.”

    “We are also generally concerned that the extremely unfortunate official public statements containing disparaging assessments of those affected by these measures contribute to the stigmatization of people from the countries concerned both in the United States and abroad and may increase their likelihood of facing xenophobic hostility and harassment,” the High Commissioner added.

    US President Donald Trump signed a proclamation on Wednesday completely banning entry into the country for citizens of 12 countries: Afghanistan, Haiti, Iran, Yemen, Libya, Myanmar, the Republic of Congo, Somalia, Sudan, Chad, Equatorial Guinea and Eritrea. The document will go into effect on June 9. –0–

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-Evening Report: Australia is in the firing line of Trump’s looming ‘revenge tax’. It’s a fight we’re unlikely to win

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Graeme Cooper, Professor of Taxation Law, University of Sydney

    Alexey_Arz/Shutterstock

    The Australian Labor Party just won an election victory for the ages. Now, it may be forced to walk back one of the key achievements of its first term.

    Here’s why: United States President Donald Trump is about to declare an income tax war on much of the world – and we Australians are not on the same side.

    Over in the US, the “One Big Beautiful Bill act” – a tax and spending package worth trillions of dollars – has been passed by the House of Representatives. It’s now before the Senate for consideration.

    Within it lies a new and highly controversial provision: Section 899. This increases various US tax rates payable by taxpayers from any country the US claims is maintaining an “unfair foreign tax” by five percentage points each year, up to an additional 20% loading.

    Having been an integral part of an international effort to create a global 15% minimum tax, Australia now finds itself in the firing line of Trump’s “revenge tax” warfare – and it’s a fight we’re unlikely to win.

    A global minimum tax rate

    The origins of the looming income tax war started in 2013, when the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) released its plan to stamp out “base erosion and profit shifting”.

    This refers to a range of strategies often used by multinational companies to minimise the tax they pay, exploiting differences and gaps in the tax rules of different countries.

    The OECD’s first attempt to tackle the problem was a collection of disparate measures directed not only at corporate tax avoidance, but also controlling tax poaching by national governments and “sweetheart deals” negotiated by tax officials.

    Under both Labor and the Coalition, Australia was initially an enthusiastic backer of these attempts.

    However, the project was not a widespread success. Many countries endorsed the final reports but, unlike Australia, few countries acted on them.

    After the failure of this first project, the OECD tried again in 2019. This evolved to encompass two “pillars” to change the global tax rules.

    Pillar one would give more tax to countries where a company’s customers are located. Pillar two is a minimum tax of 15% on (a version of) the accounting profits of the largest multinationals earned in each country where the multinational operates.

    Labor picked up this project for the 2022 election, promising to support both pillars – and they honoured that promise.

    US Speaker of the House Mike Johnson speaks following the passage of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act on May 22.
    The Washington Post/Getty

    Mixed success

    Around the world, the two pillar project had mixed success. Pillar one was dead-on-arrival: most countries did nothing. But Australia and several other countries, mostly in Europe, implemented pillar two – the global minimum tax.

    The OECD has always maintained the base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS) project was a coalition of the willing, meant to rebalance the way income tax is allocated between producer and consumer countries, and rid the world of tax havens.

    In the US, Republicans did not share that view. For them, BEPS was simply another attempt by foreign countries to get more tax from US companies.

    This Republican dissatisfaction with the OECD is now on full display. On the first day of his second term, Trump issued an executive order, formally repudiating any OECD commitments the Biden administration might have given.

    He also directed his officials to report on options for retaliatory measures the US could take against any foreign countries with income tax rules that are “extraterritorial” or “disproportionately affect American companies”.

    Why Australia is so exposed

    Australia could find itself in the firing line of Trump’s tax warfare on many fronts. And the US doesn’t lack firepower. Section 899 adds to a number of retaliatory tax provisions the US already had at its disposal.

    The increased tax rates would affect Australian super funds and other investors earning dividends, rent, interest, royalties and other income from US companies.
    Australian super funds in particular are heavily invested in US markets, which have outperformed local stocks in recent years.

    It would also affect Australian managed funds owning land and infrastructure assets in the US, as well as Australian entities such as banks that carry on business in the US.

    And there are other measures that would expose US subsidiaries of Australian companies to US higher tax.

    The bill would even remove the doctrine of sovereign immunity for the governments of “offending” countries. Sovereign immunity refers to a tax exemption on returns that usually applies to governments. This means the Australian government itself could have to pay tax to the US.

    There are concerns on Wall Street this will dampen demand for US government bonds from foreign governments, which are big buyers of US Treasuries. The argument may sway some in the Senate – but how many remains to be seen.

    What Australia may need to do next

    We may be incredulous that anyone would consider our tax system combative, but enacting the OECD pillar two was always known to be risky.

    There are other, homegrown Australian tax measures that have drawn American ire.

    In 2015, Australia enacted an income tax measure (commonly called the “Google tax”) specifically directed at US tech companies. In 2017, we followed this up with a diverted profits tax. Trump’s bill specifically targets both measures.

    Tying ourselves to the OECD’s global minimum tax project might have seemed like a good idea in 2019. In 2025, it looks decidedly unappealing, and not just because of Trump.

    First, there is not actually any serious revenue in pillar two for Australia. Treasury’s revenue estimate totalled only $360 million after four years, just slightly more than a rounding error in the federal budget.

    Second, we are increasingly alone and vulnerable in this battle. It might feel emotionally satisfying to stand up to the US. If there was a sizeable coalition alongside us, there might be some point.

    If Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill act does pass through the US Senate, the Australian government and business will be left exposed to much higher costs.

    Since abandoning the US market is not really an option, it might be time to surrender quietly and gracefully – by reversing, at the very least, the contentious bits of pillar two.

    Graeme Cooper does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. Australia is in the firing line of Trump’s looming ‘revenge tax’. It’s a fight we’re unlikely to win – https://theconversation.com/australia-is-in-the-firing-line-of-trumps-looming-revenge-tax-its-a-fight-were-unlikely-to-win-257961

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-OSI Security: Three Foreign Nationals Charged with Conspiracy and Possession with Intent to Distribute Almost Four Tons of Methamphetamine

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

    SAN DIEGO – A federal complaint was filed today charging Erick Arriola, Baltazar Rodriguez Reyes and Eugenio Lizama, alleged drivers of drug-laden vans and a truck, with conspiring to distribute almost four tons of methamphetamine.

    It was one of the biggest seizures of methamphetamine in 2025 in the Southern District of California, and the most significant so far by the new Homeland Security Task Force San Diego, which was recently established by the Department of Justice and Department of Homeland Security at the request of President Trump.

    Among other goals, the task force was created to identify and target for prosecution transnational criminal organizations engaged in drug trafficking, money laundering, weapons trafficking, human trafficking and smuggling, homicide, extortion, and kidnapping.

    The complaint alleges that on June 2, 2025, federal law enforcement officials were conducting surveillance on four vehicles – which included two white panel vans, a white Ford F150 truck, and a semi-truck – as they congregated in a parking lot in the 8200 block of Otay Mesa Road.

    According to the complaint, bundles in each vehicle had been moved from the large semi-truck into the other vehicles while in the parking lot. The three defendants drove in separate directions before they were ultimately arrested by United States Border Patrol. Each vehicle was stuffed with large bundles of methamphetamine.

    Arriola, of El Salvador, was present in the United States despite being a felon convicted of DUI, battery of a spouse, and false imprisonment. Rodriguez Reyes and Lizama are Mexican nationals.

    “The recent formation of Homeland Security Task Force San Diego is an essential step to fulfilling the promises of Operation Take Back America,” said U.S. Attorney Adam Gordon, “Our Office will fully support these enhanced law enforcement partnerships to ensure the safety of our community.”

    “As a founding member of HSTF in San Diego, I’m thrilled to be working alongside our partners who have also committed resources to combatting transnational crime,” said Shawn Gibson, special agent in charge for HSI San Diego. “Cases under the HSTF will be a priority for me and staff as we all will continue to work together to secure our border and keep our communities safe.”

    “Collaboration between law enforcement agencies greatly helps to effectively combat transnational criminal organizations,” said Acting Chief Patrol Agent Jeffrey Stalnaker. “The leveraging of our unique capabilities amplifies our ability to safeguard the nation.”

    “When we combine our unique capabilities, authorities, strengths, and assets, we create a unified response to the expansive cartel threat,” said FBI San Diego Acting Special Agent in Charge Houtan Moshrefi. “FBI San Diego will continue to collaborate with our law enforcement partners to reduce the growing epidemic of drug trafficking and violence in our community.”

    This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Kyle Martin of the U.S. Attorney’s recently created Narcoterrorism Unit.

    DEFENDANTS                                 Case Number 25mj3112                                          

    Erick Omar Arriola                                      Age 27                El Salvador

    Baltazar Rodriguez Reyes                           Age 49                Mexico

    Eugenio Lizama                                          Age 35                Mexico

    SUMMARY OF CHARGES

    Title 21, U.S.C., Sec. 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(B) – Possession with Intent to

    Distribute Methamphetamine

    Maximum penalty: Life; 10-year mandatory minimum sentence

    Title 21, U.S.C., Sec. 841(a)(1), 846 – Conspiracy to Distribute Methamphetamine

    Maximum penalty: Life; 10-year mandatory minimum sentence

    INVESTIGATING AGENCIES

    Homeland Security Investigations

    Federal Bureau of Investigation

    United States Border Patrol

    San Diego County Sheriff’s Department

    This case was investigated and prosecuted by the Homeland Security Task Force (HSTF) San Diego as part of Operation Take Back America. HSTFs, which were established by President Trump in Executive Order 14159, Protecting the American People Against Invasion, are joint operations led by the Department of Justice and the Department of Homeland Security. Operation Take Back America is a nationwide federal initiative that marshals the full resources of the Department of Justice to, among other goals, achieve the total elimination of cartels and transnational criminal organizations, and protect our communities from the perpetrators of violent crime. Operation Take Back America streamlines efforts and resources from the Department’s Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Forces and Project Safe Neighborhoods.

    *The charges and allegations contained in an indictment or complaint are merely accusations, and the defendants are considered innocent unless and until proven guilty.

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI USA: Schatz Statement On Trump Request To Rescind Foreign Assistance Funding

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Hawaii Brian Schatz

    WASHINGTON – U.S. Senator Brian Schatz (D-Hawai‘i), ranking member of the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on State and Foreign Operations, released the following statement on President Donald Trump’s request to Congress to rescind nearly $10 billion in previously-enacted funding.

    “The Trump administration is seeking to codify its evisceration of American foreign assistance. Make no mistake: doing so will make Americans less safe, less secure, and less prosperous.

    “Gutting global health programs like PEPFAR and slashing food and other life-saving assistance will cause mass death and starvation and compromise our health and safety here at home. Decimating economic and development programs abroad and abandoning global bodies like the United Nations will make it harder to advance American interests while at the same time paving the way for China to expand its influence.

    “I’m open to making changes to the budget in ways that benefit Americans and the country. But the way to make changes to what we invest in and by how much is through bipartisan appropriations bills – which we’re currently negotiating – not by jamming them through a partisan process that hasn’t been used in decades.”

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Schatz: Trump Tax Plan Would Raise Costs, Cut Health Care For Millions To Benefit Ultra-Wealthy

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Hawaii Brian Schatz

    WASHINGTON — In a speech on the Senate floor, U.S. Senator Brian Schatz (D-Hawai‘i) warned that the Republican tax bill would raise costs for working families and cut critical programs like Medicaid and food assistance in order to pay for tax breaks for the wealthiest Americans.

    “No one asked for this. No one asked for the biggest wealth transfer in American history — from the poorest people in the country to the richest people to ever exist. No one asked for the biggest ever cuts to Medicaid — to kick 14 million people off of health insurance and raise out-of-pocket costs for 20 million people. No one asked for food assistance to be slashed for millions of children and low-income families. No one asked for higher prices at the pump or on their electricity bills. No one asked for students across the country to lose federal financial aid,” Senator Schatz began. “I don’t think Trump voters asked for this. I know Harris voters didn’t. I don’t think anybody wants this.”

    “It is quite hard to believe that you would cut food assistance and cut health care and cut help for regular working people in order to shovel money to people making more than $4 million a year. But that is exactly what they’re doing. It is as if they designed this bill in a lab to make the maximum number of people angry. It’s unpopular. It is unnecessary. And they’re doing it anyway,” Senator Schatz continued. “Do [billionaires] need $300,000? Because I know people who need $300. I know people who actually won’t be able to stay on any health care at all if these [Obamacare] subsidies go away.”

    The full text of Senator Schatz’s remarks is below. Video is available here.

    No one asked for this. No one asked for the biggest wealth transfer in American history — from the poorest people in the country to the richest people to ever exist. No one asked for the biggest ever cuts to Medicaid — to kick 14 million people off of health insurance and raise out-of-pocket costs for 20 million people. No one asked for food assistance to be slashed for millions of children and low-income families. No one asked for higher prices at the pump or on their electricity bills. No one asked for students across the country to lose federal financial aid. No one asked for any of this, and I really mean that. That’s not just a rhetorical flourish. I don’t think Trump voters asked for this. I know Harris voters did not ask for this. I don’t think anybody really wants this.

    I think the reason that all of these crazy, harmful policies are about to be enacted is for one simple reason — and that is to generate enough revenue to satisfy the insatiable desire for tax cuts for people who make more than $4 million a year. They are literally taking money out of food assistance and Medicaid and Affordable Care Act monthly subsidies. By the way, you don’t know if you get a subsidy or not. You just go on the exchange, and you pay the thing. The thing is, that thing is probably four, five, six hundred dollars a month less than it used to be because of the subsidies.

    So it’s one thing to say 14 million people are going to get kicked off of Medicaid — and they will. It’s another thing to say, because of those Medicaid cuts, a bunch of clinics and hospitals in rural communities are going to shut down — and they will. I think what’s a little underrated is many, many more millions of people are going to pay not 50 bucks more a year, not $100 more per month, but many hundreds of dollars more per month. Why? Because when you yank that money out of the system — it is what is called a pay-for. It means it generates a ton of revenue. How does it generate that revenue? By screwing regular people.

    They are racing to pass a bill that does all of these things, that raises the deficit — excuse me, the debt — by many, many trillions of dollars. And I think the problem that some of us have — and I really appreciate the presiding officer, and when we agree we work really well together, and when we disagree we are at least able to stay civil, and so I’m trying to take the edge off of this — but one of the reasons that it sounds like I’m frothing at the mouth and saying a bunch of partisan talking points is that it’s kind of hard to believe that any political party would actually do this on purpose.

    It is quite hard to believe that you would cut food assistance and cut health care and cut help for regular working people in order to shovel money to people making more than $4 million a year. But that is exactly what they’re doing. It is as if they designed this bill in a lab to make the maximum number of people angry. It’s unpopular. It is unnecessary. And they’re doing it anyway.

    Hospitals serving rural and low-income communities will be forced to shutter because they won’t be adequately compensated for their services. And by the way — again, not a talking point — go and visit any rural clinic or hospital, ask them what percentage of their payer mix comes from Medicaid and what would happen if they lost a big chunk of that. A lot of them say — the big ones (big is relative, but in the state of Hawai‘i our big institutions say), “Well, we could stay afloat. We’d just have to deliver a lot less care, and then everybody would end up in the ER.” Right? The Queen’s Medical Center — the sort of number one trauma center right in the middle of Honolulu — is already bursting at the seams. You’ve got multiple people in the hallways, all of the rooms, all of the beds are taken. It was just a couple of months ago that they finally figured out a way not to release the psychiatric emergencies right onto Punchbowl Avenue in their hospital gowns. That’s before they do this to the hospitals.

    After the ACA passed, you go on the exchange, select a plan, and pay a fraction of what you used to pay. And I think one of the things is that the Obamacare is now so old that people forgot how horrible it was before then — really horrible. And so now you just go on and you’re kind of irritated because it’s still money, and it still feels like too much, and it still feels like your HMO or your provider, you know, kind of nitpicks you and, you know, doesn’t cover a bunch of care, and the co-pays are too high. But it is way, way, way better than it used to be. And so this whole enterprise is for one single purpose — and that is to generate enough money to cut taxes for billionaire corporations and people who make $4 million or more in revenue. It’s very, very few people benefiting and tens of millions of people being screwed.

    There’s little in this bill that will help regular people who are already struggling to meet their monthly obligations, but there are plenty of rewards for the ultra-wealthy. Millionaires stand to gain roughly $70,000 in tax cuts, while billionaires in the top 1% will see close to $300,000 in benefits. And how do they find that money to shovel to the millionaires and billionaires?

    I don’t mind a millionaire or a billionaire. I know like two billionaires — not close, but I’ve like met them — and I’m sure I know many millionaires. There are a number of colleagues in the Senate who are in that category, so it’s not like I’m not trying to demonize anybody. I’m just saying — do they need $300,000? Because I know people who need $300. I know people who actually won’t be able to stay on any health care at all if these subsidies go away.

    This is not the closing of loopholes. This is not fiscal discipline. And I want to make this point as clearly as I can: we would be in a harder position to argue against this bill if it were actually deficit neutral, right? Because traditionally the accusation against Democrats is — they want to bust the budget, and Republicans want to be responsible. But this one’s weird, because this is like — under the guise of “we’ve got to do austerity, we’ve got to do tough stuff, we’ve got to cut” — and then they come up with a bill that actually increases the deficit over baseline. Even when they do their kind of nonsensical accounting where they basically have stopped counting the tax cuts that are in place because that — “Oh no, that’s the baseline.”

    And so the whole enterprise — and everybody needs to understand this — they are making everything more expensive. That is food, that is medicine, that is groceries, that is gasoline, that is electricity. And the reason they’re making it more expensive is because they are either indifferent to the suffering, or — more importantly — they just need the money. And they don’t need the money to — you know, we’ve raised taxes in the past as a country to fight a war, right? To beat Nazism. Or we’ve raised taxes in the past to shrink the deficit. Or we’ve raised taxes and raised costs for people to invest in something important. That’s not what we’re doing here.

    We are blowing up the budget, and we are harming regular people in order to provide tax cuts for people who literally didn’t ask for it.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Video: Discussion on President Trump’s One, Big, Beautiful Bill

    Source: United States of America – The White House (video statements)

    Senior White House officials Taylor Budowich, Stephen Miller, Russ Vought, and James Braid discuss President Trump’s One, Big, Beautiful Bill.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vAvXIapb-2s

    MIL OSI Video

  • MIL-OSI USA: Booker Statement on President Trump Reinstating U.S. Travel Ban

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for New Jersey Cory Booker

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — Today, U.S. Senator Cory Booker (D-NJ), a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee and Senate Foreign Relations Committee, and the ranking member of the Senate Foreign Relations Subcommittee on Africa and Global Health Policy, issued the following statement after Donald Trump announced a full travel ban on 12 countries and partial travel restrictions on another 7:

    “This reckless and discriminatory ban doesn’t make us safer. All it will do is further isolate the United States from our allies and weaken our global leadership. Indiscriminately closing our doors to people fleeing violence and instability, preventing U.S. citizens from reuniting with their families, or singling out people simply because of the country in which they were born, is antithetical to our nation’s most fundamental values.

    “This ban also comes at a time when Trump has redirected significant counterterrorism resources to deporting longtime, taxpaying, law-abiding, U.S. residents. Our national security officers should be focused on investigating serious threats, not barring entry to our country based on bias and pretext.

    “Like we did in his first term, Americans must once again stand up against this renewed attempt to vilify and exclude at the expense of our most cherished values.”

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: ICYMI: Senator Coons raises concerns over Trump’s Sixth Circuit nominee’s qualifications and experience

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Delaware Christopher Coons

    WASHINGTON – In case you missed it, U.S. Senator Chris Coons (D-Del.) earned praise yesterday for his questioning of Whitney Hermandorfer, President Donald Trump’s nominee for a seat on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, regarding her lack of professional experience as part of a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing. 

    Trump nominated Hermandorfer to fill the vacancy left by Judge Jane Stranch’s decision to take senior status. Senator Coons questioned Hermandorfer’s readiness to fill the seat, as Hermandorfer has only 10 years of legal work experience and has never tried a case to a jury verdict, performed direct or cross examinations in federal court, taken or defended depositions, or delivered oral arguments before the U.S. Supreme Court. 

    Senator Coons pointed out that the judge Hermandorfer has been nominated to replace had over three decades of legal experience before President Barack Obama nominated her to the Sixth Circuit. He also noted that the non-partisan American Bar Association, which has historically been seen as objective vetter by presidents of both parties, would likely rate Hermandorfer as ‘unqualified’ because of her lack of experience.

    From USA TODAY: Trump nominees for judgeships face scrutiny of youth, lack of experience

    “I am concerned about the striking brevity of your professional record,” Sen. Chris Coons, a Democrat from Delaware, told Hermandorfer. He said she only graduated from law school 10 years, [sic] ago, but the judge she is being recommended to replace had 31 years on the bench before her nomination.

    Coons pointed to a longtime standard from the American Bar Association that says federal judicial appointees should have at least 12 years of experience. While the association has long been involved in vetting judicial appointments, Attorney General Pam Bondi has said the association, which many conservatives criticize as too liberal, won’t be involved.

    From POLITICO: Confirmation process begins for Trump’s first judicial nominees

    …Democratic Sen. Chris Coons of Delaware suggested the nominee lacked the experience typically seen in lawyers proposed for federal appellate judgeships.

    “I am concerned about the striking brevity of your professional record,” said Coons. “You graduated from law school just a decade ago,” said Coons.

    Under further examination by Coons, Hermandorfer acknowledged she has never been lead counsel in a federal jury trial, questioned a witness on the stand or conducted a deposition.

    A video of Senator Coons’ full questioning and transcript of his comments are available below.

    WATCH HERE

    CAC: Thank you very much. Ms. Hermandorfer, thank you for your service and the Tennessee Attorney General’s office, and congratulations to you and your family for your nomination. As you may know, I am not a reflexive ‘no’ vote on nominees of a president of the other party. I supported President Trump’s judicial nominees in his first term when they had the qualifications and experience for the job and the character and the independence to carry out the role of a judge, particularly circuit judge, with integrity. I am concerned about the striking brevity of your professional record. You graduated from law school just a decade ago, and you spent four years with impressive clerkships, but often nominees for a position such as the circuit have real experience in court. Have you ever served as the sole or chief counsel in any case, tried to a jury verdict?

    Hermandorfer: Not to a jury verdict, Senator.

    CAC: Have you ever served as the sole or chief counsel in any case tried to a final judgment?

    Hermandorfer: I’ve served as chief counsel in many final judgment cases in trial court. If you mean a bench trial, I’m sorry I don’t understand, a bench trial would be no, but final judgment.

    CAC: How many direct examinations have you personally taken in federal court?

    Hermandorfer: As an appellate lawyer, I don’t usually take direct examinations, and the answer is zero.

    CAC: How many cross examinations have you taken in federal court?

    Hermandorfer: None.

    CAC: How many depositions have you taken?

    Hermandorfer: Again, as an appellate lawyer, that’s not really part of my practice.

    CAC: How many depositions have you defended?

    Hermandorfer: I have not defended depositions.

    CAC: How many federal appellate oral arguments have you presented?

    Hermandorfer: Federal appellate oral arguments? That would be four.

    CAC: And how many Supreme Court oral arguments have you presented?

    Hermandorfer: None. Though I’ve second-chaired and been counsel of record in Supreme Court matters.

    CAC: I’ll just point out that the jurist you’ve been nominated to replace, Judge Jane Stranch, had 31 years of legal experience under her belt when nominated to this position in the Sixth Circuit, and the ABA, although disregarded by some, has long had a standard that without more than adozen years of federal service, they would deem someone unqualified for positions such as what you’ve been nominated for. Let me move to a different issue, the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Number 65 sets out the rules of the road for issuing TROs and PIs, including whether a party moving must post a security bond. What factors should an appellate judge consider when ruling on a challenge to a security bond set or not set by a district court under FRCP 65c before issuing a TRO or a PI?

    Hermandorfer: So, this comes up sometimes when the state is a litigant, and oftentimes parties can move to waive the security bond, and what a court is looking to is the gravity of harm to the potential appellant, should the case, the disposition in the District Court, be allowed to moveforward. So, it’s similar to kind of equitable considerations of harm and the gravity of that harm, and whether it would be reparable or, you know, compensable on the other end.

    CAC: Thank you. And in what sorts of cases is it typical to set or require a security bond?

    Hermandorfer: So, I think cases in which there’s going to be financial exposure, for example, on behalf of an appellant, could be such a case where a bond might be…

    CAC: Post contract case, or a case involving infringement of a patent or something like that. Does your analysis change if the matter is a constitutional case brought by a private plaintiff against allegedly unconstitutional actions of the federal government?

    Hermandorfer: So, it’s, I would have to take each constitutional violation and ruling on its own terms, and wouldn’t want to prejudge but the equitable factors, of course, would be the ones that I would apply in such a situation.

    CAC: How would you set a bond for something as foundational as a violation of the Constitution?

    Hermandorfer: I’m not sure I could answer that in the abstract, senator.

    CAC: And I’m not sure district court judges could answer that either. What tools does the Sixth Circuit, or any circuit, have to enforce its judgments? If you were confirmed and a party disobeys an order of the Sixth Circuit, perhaps even one you wrote, what would you do?

    Hermandorfer: Well, I know that there are mechanisms by which, of course, judgments are entered and executed and enforced through federal district courts.

    CAC: And what are those mechanisms?

    Hermandorfer: Well, the federal district court sometimes can issue contempt rulings, for example, that are appealable. And you know, if you’re talking about warrants or orders of those sort, I know the U.S. Marshals’ office has some sort of involvement in that, but I confess this hasn’t been part of something that I’ve litigated.

    CAC: And when would you feel you’d met the standard to call in the marshals to execute your judgment?

    Hermandorfer: I think it’s very difficult again, to answer that question in the abstract, and I could just tell you, as a party, I’ve followed the appellate practice process whenever I felt as though a judgment had gone the wrong way against me, and I’ve secured appellate relief in those situations.

    CAC: Last question, what would you do if the U.S. Marshals were to disobey and refuse to execute the judgment of the circuit court, if they were instructed by the DOJ to stand down and to refuse to implement an order of the court?

    Hermandorfer: That would, probably, as junior appellate judge on my court, be something that I would look to my colleagues and whatever governing rules and precedents would govern that situation, but again, on the abstract as a hypothetical matter.

    CAC: Ms. Hermandorfer, I hope this is an abstract and hypothetical matter, but it’s one that occupies quite a few of us and quite a bit of our discussion on this committee, as we come up against the question of whether or not we have a president willing to disobey orders of federal courts. Thank you for your testimony. Thank you.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Crapo, Grassley and Republican Colleagues Introduce Legislation to Bolster Violent Crime Laws

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Idaho Mike Crapo
    Washington, D.C.–U.S. Senator Mike Crapo (R-Idaho) joined Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and nine Republican colleagues in introducing legislation to strengthen violent crime statutes and help prevent future crime.  The Combating Violent and Dangerous Crime Act would clarify and strengthen penalties for violent offenses like carjacking, robbery and kidnapping. 
    “Our legal system has a duty to punish the guilty and protect the innocent, and conflicting legal standards hamper the ability of federal authorities to do so,” Crapo said.  “These necessary reforms clarify and strengthen federal drug and violent crime laws to ensure justice is applied fairly to all.”
    “Under the Biden-Harris Administration, our nation saw a massive spike in violent crime.  As the Trump Administration works to clean up the previous Administration’s mess, Congress has a duty to resolve any legal ambiguities that may weaken our ability to hold criminals fully accountable,” Grassley said.  “Our bill includes several modest, but meaningful, reforms to tamp down on future crime and ensure justice is served.”
    The Combating Violent and Dangerous Crime Act would address ambiguity and conflicting applications of existing law by clarifying congressional intent.  Among other provisions, the bill would: 
    Resolve conflicting circuit court decisions that have resulted in a higher burden to charge violent offenses;
    Clarify that an attempt or conspiracy to commit an offense involving physical force meets the legal definition of a violent crime; 
    Increase the statutory maximum penalty for carjacking and remove a duplicative intent requirement needed to charge a carjacking offense;
    Clarify that attempted bank robbery and conspiracy to commit bank robbery are punishable under the current bank robbery statute; 
    Outlaw the marketing of candy-flavored drugs to minors; and 
    Establish a new category of violent kidnapping offenses, allowing for greater penalties for violent kidnapping.
    Crapo and Grassley are joined by Senators Jim Risch (R-Idaho), John Boozman (R-Arkansas), Kevin Cramer (R-North Dakota), Bill Cassidy (R-Louisiana), James Lankford (R-Oklahoma), Mitch McConnell (R-Kentucky), Susan Collins (R-Maine), Shelley Moore Capito (R-West Virginia) and Thom Tillis (R-North Carolina).
    Read the full bill text here. Read a section-by-section here.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Bill to Codify Key DOGE Initiative, Effectively Eliminate Billions in Improper Payments

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator Kevin Cramer (R-ND)

    WASHINGTON, D.C. – Shortly after President Donald Trump’s inauguration, he established the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) to maximize efficiency and productivity within the federal government. U.S. Senator Kevin Cramer (R-ND), a member of the Senate DOGE Caucus, joined caucus chairs U.S. Senator Joni Ernst (R-IA) and U.S. Representative Aaron Bean (R-FL-04) in introducing the DOGE in Spending Act to codify one of DOGE’s practices to identify and prevent fraudulent or improper payments.

    Introduction of the DOGE in Spending Act follows a recent Government Accountability Office report revealing 16 federal agencies reported an estimated $162 billion in improper payments across 68 programs in Fiscal Year 2024. The bill modernizes the U.S. Department of Treasury’s payment oversight system by requiring each federal disbursement include the payment’s purpose, funding source, and activity type all of which must be certified annually and publicly reported on USAspending.gov.

    It also empowers the Do Not Pay system to prevent improper payments by granting the U.S. Department of Treasury real-time access to verification data across agencies.

    “From the moment he took office, President Trump laid out a clear agenda: eliminate waste, reduce unnecessary spending, and restore fiscal sanity to Washington,” said Cramer. “The Department of Government Efficiency has delivered—cutting through layers of bureaucracy. This agency has taken a scalpel to the federal government, slashing misspending, and eliminating fraudulent and improper payments. By codifying DOGE’s best practices, we safeguard the taxpayer dollars of North Dakotans and Americans across the country.”

    “Requiring government to answer basic questions before spending tax dollars will save billions over the next decade,” said Ernst. “Enacting safeguards to spending has been one of the Trump administration’s and DOGE’s greatest triumphs, and I am determined to codify it and make it permanent. At $36 trillion in debt, the cost of inaction is too high, and I will continue to lead the fight in Washington to root out waste, fraud, and abuse.”

    “For too long, improper and fraudulent payments have drained resources and undermined trust in government spending,” said Bean. “The American people deserve responsible stewardship of their tax dollars, and this bill delivers exactly that. By ensuring federal payments are accurate, transparent, and verifiable, we are eliminating waste, fraud, and abuse in the federal government. This legislation takes the first critical step toward codifying DOGE efforts into law—bringing real oversight and integrity to the way taxpayer dollars are managed.”

    Cramer is a member of the Senate DOGE Caucus, a bicameral effort launched to advance DOGE priorities through legislation and oversight. The caucus, led by Ernst and backed by President Trump, is committed to rooting out waste, fraud, and abuse across the federal bureaucracy.

    Click here for bill text. Click here for a section-by-section breakdown.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI China: Xi says dialogue, cooperation only correct choice for China, U.S. in phone call with Trump

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    Xi says dialogue, cooperation only correct choice for China, U.S. in phone call with Trump

    BEIJING, June 5 — Chinese President Xi Jinping said on Thursday that dialogue and cooperation are the only correct choice for China and the United States.

    In the phone talks initiated by U.S. President Donald Trump, Xi said that recalibrating the direction of the giant ship of China-U.S. relations requires the two sides to take the helm and set the right course, adding that it is particularly important to steer clear of the various disturbances and disruptions.

    Noting that at the suggestion of the U.S. side, the two countries’ lead officials recently held an economic and trade meeting in Geneva, Xi said it marked an important step forward in resolving the relevant issues through dialogue and consultation, and was welcomed by both societies and the international community.

    The two sides need to make good use of the economic and trade consultation mechanism already in place, and seek win-win results in the spirit of equality and respect for each other’s concerns, he said, adding that the Chinese side is sincere about this, and at the same time has its principles.

    The Chinese, Xi said, always honor and deliver what has been promised, urging both sides to make good on the agreement reached in Geneva. In fact, China has been seriously and earnestly executing the agreement, Xi added.

    The U.S. side should acknowledge the progress already made, and remove the negative measures taken against China, he said.

    The two sides should enhance communication in such fields as foreign affairs, economy and trade, military, and law enforcement to build consensus, clear up misunderstandings, and strengthen cooperation, Xi added.

    Xi emphasized that the United States must handle the Taiwan question with prudence, so that the fringe separatists bent on “Taiwan independence” will not be able to drag China and the United States into the dangerous terrain of confrontation and even conflict.

    Trump said that he has great respect for Xi, and the U.S.-China relationship is very important.

    The United States wants the Chinese economy to do very well, and the United States and China working together can get a lot of great things done, he said.

    Trump said the United States will honor the one-China policy.

    The meeting in Geneva was very successful and produced a good deal, he said, adding that the United States will work with China to execute the deal.

    The United States loves to have Chinese students coming to study in America, Trump said.

    Xi welcomed Trump to visit China again, for which Trump expressed heartfelt appreciation.

    The two presidents agreed that their teams should continue implementing the Geneva agreement and hold another round of meetings as soon as possible.

    MIL OSI China News

  • MIL-OSI China: Xi says dialogue, cooperation only correct choice for China, US in phone call with Trump

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    Chinese President Xi Jinping said on Thursday that dialogue and cooperation are the only correct choice for China and the United States.

    In the phone talks initiated by U.S. President Donald Trump, Xi said that recalibrating the direction of the giant ship of China-U.S. relations requires the two sides to take the helm and set the right course, adding that it is particularly important to steer clear of the various disturbances and disruptions.

    Noting that at the suggestion of the U.S. side, the two countries’ lead officials recently held an economic and trade meeting in Geneva, Xi said it marked an important step forward in resolving the relevant issues through dialogue and consultation, and was welcomed by both societies and the international community.

    The two sides need to make good use of the economic and trade consultation mechanism already in place, and seek win-win results in the spirit of equality and respect for each other’s concerns, he said, adding that the Chinese side is sincere about this, and at the same time has its principles.

    The Chinese, Xi said, always honor and deliver what has been promised, urging both sides to make good on the agreement reached in Geneva. In fact, China has been seriously and earnestly executing the agreement, Xi added.

    The U.S. side should acknowledge the progress already made, and remove the negative measures taken against China, he said.

    The two sides should enhance communication in such fields as foreign affairs, economy and trade, military, and law enforcement to build consensus, clear up misunderstandings, and strengthen cooperation, Xi added.

    Xi emphasized that the United States must handle the Taiwan question with prudence, so that the fringe separatists bent on “Taiwan independence” will not be able to drag China and the United States into the dangerous terrain of confrontation and even conflict.

    Trump said that he has great respect for Xi, and the U.S.-China relationship is very important.

    The United States wants the Chinese economy to do very well, and the United States and China working together can get a lot of great things done, he said.

    Trump said the United States will honor the one-China policy.

    The meeting in Geneva was very successful and produced a good deal, he said, adding that the United States will work with China to execute the deal.

    The United States loves to have Chinese students coming to study in America, Trump said.

    Xi welcomed Trump to visit China again, for which Trump expressed heartfelt appreciation.

    The two presidents agreed that their teams should continue implementing the Geneva agreement and hold another round of meeting as soon as possible. 

    MIL OSI China News

  • MIL-OSI China: Trump, Musk clash over economic policy, spending bill

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    U.S. President Donald Trump and billionaire Elon Musk traded barbs over the Trump administration’s sweeping tax-cut and spending bill on Thursday, a week after Musk left the administration.

    The tax-cut and spending bill, also known as the “Big and Beautiful Bill,” is part of Trump’s core agenda and includes a series of economic measures such as eliminating tax credits for electric vehicle consumers, increasing investment in border security, and lowering corporate and personal tax rates.

    Musk has been fiercely criticizing the bill in recent days. On Thursday, he called the bill a “mountain of disgusting pork” on social media.

    “In the entire history of civilization, there has never been legislation that (is) both big and beautiful. Everyone knows this,” said Musk on social media.

    “Either you get a big and ugly bill or a slim and beautiful bill. Slim and beautiful is the way,” he said.

    Trump said Musk’s dissatisfaction stemmed from the bill’s proposal to eliminate tax credits for electric vehicle consumers, which affected Musk’s interests as CEO of electric vehicle manufacturer Tesla.

    “Look, Elon and I had a great relationship. I don’t know if we will anymore,” Trump said in the Oval Office.

    “I’m very disappointed in Elon. I’ve helped Elon a lot,” he added.

    “Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate,” said Musk at one point on Thursday afternoon.

    As for Trump’s post saying Musk “wearing thin” and going “crazy” and he asked Musk to leave, Musk referred the post as “Such an obvious lie. So sad.”

    Musk, however, said he opposed the bill because it would increase the federal deficit.

    Following Trump’s criticism of Musk, Tesla’s stock price fell more than 15 percent on Thursday afternoon. As of this year, Tesla’s share price has fallen over 30 percent.

    Musk was once a staunch ally of Trump, spending nearly 300 million U.S. dollars to support Trump’s campaign in 2024. After Trump won the presidential election, Musk joined the newly established Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), responsible for overseeing bureaucratic corruption and reducing the national debt.

    DOGE’s work led to thousands of federal government layoffs and cuts of billions of dollars in foreign aid and other programs, sparking multiple protests in the United States and around the world. On Wednesday last week, Musk announced his departure.

    Musk also initiated a survey on Twitter regarding “is it time to create a new political party in America that actually represents the 80 percent in the middle,” which drew more than 510,000 votes in about one hour. 

    MIL OSI China News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Administrator Loeffler Applauds House Passage of “Save SBA from Sanctuary Cities Act”

    Source: United States Small Business Administration

    WASHINGTON — Today, Kelly Loeffler, Administrator of the U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) applauded the U.S. House of Representatives’ bipartisan passage of H.R. 2931, the Save SBA from Sanctuary Cities Act of 2025, which will support the agency’s decision to relocate SBA field offices out of sanctuary jurisdictions that refuse to comply with federal immigration law.

    “By harboring criminal illegal aliens, sanctuary cities jeopardize both the lives of American citizens and the livelihoods of our small businesses — which is exactly why the SBA is moving our field offices out of these lawless jurisdictions and into safer, more accessible communities that comply with federal law,” said Administrator Loeffler. “This Administration is committed to ending the illegal invasion of our nation – and I am grateful for the bipartisan group of House lawmakers who voted in support of that agenda by passing the Save SBA from Sanctuary Cities Act of 2025.”

    In March, the SBA announced it would relocate six of its regional offices out of sanctuary cities, including Atlanta, Boston, Chicago, Denver, New York City, and Seattle. This decision was undertaken not only in support of President Donald J. Trump’s Executive Order 14218 ending the taxpayer subsidization of open borders, but also as part of SBA’s commitment to relocating field offices to safer, less costly, and more accessible communities.

    Under the leadership of Administrator Loeffler, the SBA has taken numerous steps to put American citizens first. Earlier this year, the agency announced it would require SBA loan applications to include a citizenship verification provision to ensure only legal, eligible applicants have access to taxpayer-funded SBA loan programs.

    # # #

    About the U.S. Small Business Administration
    The U.S. Small Business Administration helps power the American dream of entrepreneurship. As the leading voice for small businesses within the federal government, the SBA empowers job creators with the resources and support they need to start, grow, and expand their businesses or recover from a declared disaster. It delivers services through an extensive network of SBA field offices and partnerships with public and private organizations. To learn more, visit www.sba.gov.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Rosen Blasts Trump Administration Decision to Rescind Requirement for Hospitals to Provide Emergency Abortions

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator Jacky Rosen (D-NV)

    WASHINGTON, DC – Today, U.S. Senator Jacky Rosen released the following statement condemning the Trump Administration’s dangerous decision to rescind federal guidance that required hospitals to provide emergency reproductive care and protected doctors and health care providers who perform abortions during life-threatening emergency cases, regardless of state bans on the procedure.
    “The outrageous decision by the Trump Administration to get rid of federal requirements for hospitals to provide emergency abortions will have dire consequences for women in need of life-saving care,” said Senator Rosen. “Make no mistake – doctors will be arrested simply for doing their jobs and women will die as a result of this dangerous action by Donald Trump to implement his Project 2025 agenda. I’ll do everything I can to fight back against these dangerous anti-choice policies and push to restore Roe v. Wade.”
    Senator Rosen has been fighting against extreme anti-choice efforts to restrict women’s reproductive freedoms. Last year, she voted to protect access to IVF and joined legislation to federally protect access to IVF treatments. Senator Rosen helped introduce the Let Doctors Provide Reproductive Health Care Act to protect doctors and other health care professionals from being prosecuted for providing reproductive care to their patients. She also voted to protect women’s constitutional right to access birth control.

    MIL OSI USA News