Category: United States of America

  • Syria’s Sharaa vows to protect Druze rights as ceasefire holds

    Source: Government of India

    Source: Government of India (4)

    Syrian leader Ahmed al-Sharaa accused Israel of trying to fracture Syria and promised to protect its Druze minority on Thursday, after U.S. intervention helped end deadly fighting between government forces and Druze fighters in the south.

    Overnight, the Islamist-led government’s troops withdrew from the predominantly Druze city of Sweida, where scores of people have been killed in days of conflict.

    One local journalist said he’d counted more than 60 bodies in the streets of Sweida on Thursday morning. Ryan Marouf of Suwayda24 told Reuters he had found a family of 12 people killed in one house, including women and an elderly man. “People are looking for bodies,” he said in a voice recording.

    Violence in Syria escalated sharply on Wednesday as Israel launched airstrikes in Damascus,while also hitting government forces in the south, demanding they withdraw and saying Israel aimed to protect Syrian Druze -part of asmall but influential minority that also has followers in Lebanon and Israel.

    Israel, which bombed Syria frequently under the rule of ousted President Bashar al-Assad, has struck the country repeatedly this year, describing its new leaders as barely disguised jihadists and saying it will not allow them to deploy forces in areas of southern Syria near its border.

    Addressing Syrians on Thursday, interim President Sharaa accused Israel of seeking to “dismantle the unity of our people”, saying it had “consistently targeted our stability and created discord among us since the fall of the former regime”.

    Sharaa, who was commander of an al Qaeda faction before cutting ties with the group in 2016, said protecting Druze citizens and their rights was “our priority” and rejected any attempt to drag them into the hands of an “external party”.

    He also vowed to hold to account those who committed violations against “our Druze people”.

    The Syrian Network for Human Rights said it had documented 193 dead in four days of fighting, among them medical personnel, women and children.

    The Network’s head Fadel Abdulghany told Reuters the figure included cases of field executions by both sides, Syrians killed by Israeli strikes and others killed in clashes but that it would take time to break down the figures for each category.

    A Reuters reporter saw government fighters loot and burn homes during this week’s violence, including just before they departed Sweida overnight. Fighters also shaved off the moustaches of Druze men.

    Moustaches are worn by Druze sheikhs and many other Druze men as a symbol of religious and cultural identity with spiritual significance.

    U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said late on Wednesday the United States had engaged all the parties involved and that steps had been agreed that would end “this troubling and horrifying situation”.

    Sharaa credited U.S. Arab and Turkish mediation for saving “the region from an uncertain fate”. A Turkish security source said Ankara played a crucial role in securing the ceasefire.

    The violence has underlined the challenges that Sharaa faces in stabilizing Syria and exerting centralised rule over the country, despite his warming ties with the United States and his administration’s evolving security contacts with Israel.

    Sharaa faces challenges to stitch Syria back together in the face of deep misgivings from groups that fear Islamist rule. In March, mass killings of members of the Alawite minority exacerbated the mistrust. The Druze follow a religion that is an offshoot of Islam.

    ISRAELI STRIKES

    Israel’s airstrikes on Wednesday blew up part of Syria’s defence ministry and hit near the presidential palace as it vowed to destroy government forces attacking Druze in southern Syria.

    “We will not allow southern Syria to become a terror stronghold,” said Eyal Zamir, Israel’s military chief of staff.

    The United Nations Security Council will meet on Thursday to address the conflict, diplomats said.

    “The council must condemn the barbaric crimes committed against innocent civilians on Syrian soil,” said Israel’s ambassador to the U.N., Danny Danon. “Israel will continue to act resolutely against any terrorist threat on its borders, anywhere and at any time.”

    Scores of Israeli Druze broke through the border fence on Wednesday, linking up with Druze on the Syrian side.

    Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu urged Israeli Druze citizens not to cross the border. The Israeli military said it was working to safely return civilians who had crossed.

    (Reuters)

  • MIL-OSI Security: Defense News in Brief: STARR, Stripes programs reward Airmen, Guardians referrals

    Source: United States Airforce

    Two programs, Stellar Talent Acquisition Recruiting Referral and Stripes for Referrals, aim to incentivize all Airmen and Guardians to inspire the next generation to serve in the Air Force and Space Force.

    Airmen and Guardians are eligible for decorations or promotions through recruiting referrals under the Airman and Guardian Referral Program.

    Referral Programs 
    Two programs, Stellar Talent Acquisition Recruiting Referral and Stripes for Referrals, aim to incentivize all Airmen and Guardians to inspire the next generation to serve in the Air Force and Space Force.

    Who is Eligible for Medals 
    STARR authorizes enlisted service members up to senior master sergeant and officers up to lieutenant colonel to receive up to two Air and Space Achievement Medals for referring three enlisted accessions applicants who depart for basic military training.

    Additionally, any enlisted member or officer up to colonel, may receive the Air and Space Commendation Medal for referring five enlisted accessions applicants who depart for BMT.

    Who is Eligible for Promotion
    Stripes for Referrals allows Airman and Guardian recruits to be promoted up to E-2 by referring two enlisted accessions candidates, or to E-3 by referring four enlisted accessions candidates who join the Delayed Entry Program or Delayed Entry Training.

    How To Apply
    Applications must be submitted through the Aim High application to qualify for the Air and Space Achievement and Commendation Medals. All users must create an account and input information in the ‘Refer a Friend’ portion of the app to receive credit for valid referrals.

    The Department of the Air Force launched a Barriers to Service Cross-Functional Team to examine existing policies and procedures to ensure they reflect the service members needed for the future. The programs are part of this initiative and serve as a cost-effective instrument for referring candidates and increasing enlistments throughout the DAF.

    Learn More
    More information on the STARR program can be found in DAFMAN 36-2806 and Stripes for Referrals in DAFMAN 36-2032.

    To submit referrals via application: 
    – Download the Aim High Application on your mobile device
    – Create an account using your full, first and last name and your .mil email address
    – Open the application and look for the three horizontal lines at the bottom right labeled ‘more’
    – Select ‘more’ and scroll to the bottom and select ‘Refer a Friend’ 

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Security: Defense News in Brief: JBSA Airmen bring help, hope to flood-stricken Hill Country communities

    Source: United States Airforce

    Members of the 33rd Cyberspace Operations Squadron, 59th Medical Wing and 502d Air Base Wing assisted with flood relief operations in the Texas Hill Country, supporting efforts in the communities of Ingram and Hunt.

    In a display of service and compassion, members of the 33rd Cyberspace Operations Squadron, 59th Medical Wing and 502nd Air Base Wing assisted on July 11 with flood relief operations in the Texas Hill Country, supporting efforts in the communities of Ingram and Hunt.

    One team assembled at City West Church in Kerrville, partnering with Mercy Chefs to organize and distribute hot meals. Three additional groups were dispatched to Hunt to assist with debris removal and participate in search and recovery operations in flood-damaged areas.

    “We partnered with Heroes for Humanity, the Mexican National Fire Department, and local rescue teams, including K-9 units, to help bring closure to families in the wake of this tragedy,” said Master Sgt. Nicholas Galbraith, 33rd Cyberspace Operations Squadron flight chief.

    “It was incredibly moving to see our Airmen volunteer their personal time to come out and serve. Efforts like this strengthen our bonds, not just within the unit, but with the community,” Galbraith said. “Our presence matters. We want these families to know they’re not alone, and that the Air Force is here for them, standing alongside them during their time of loss.”

    The response was part of a broader effort following the catastrophic flash floods that struck the Texas Hill Country on July 4-5. According to news reports, 130 people died, including 103 in Kerr County alone, with around 160 others still missing.

    At the direction of Galbraith, Joint Base San Antonio mobilized volunteers from across multiple units to assist in the recovery and support efforts.

    At City West Church, JBSA personnel partnered with Mercy Chefs, a nonprofit organization specializing in feeding disaster victims and first responders. The Airmen worked side by side with civilian volunteers to prep meals, organize donations, and provide emotional and spiritual care to anyone who needed it.

    “Mercy Chefs was founded nearly 20 years ago in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina,” said Gary LeBlanc, CEO and founder of the organization. “We provide high-quality, chef-prepared meals to victims, volunteers and first responders, both across the country and around the world.”

    LeBlanc said his team had been vacationing and picnicking over the holiday when they saw the flooding and immediately mobilized.

    “We were able to deploy quickly and got our first meals out by Saturday night, most of which went directly to the rescue teams that had started responding on Friday,” LeBlanc said.

    The arrival of Air Force personnel on Friday provided a significant boost to their efforts.

    “When the Air Force came in today, it was a game changer,” LeBlanc said. “They were incredibly sharp, followed instructions, were proactive, and immediately integrated into the operation. It was an amazing lift for us. We prepared nearly 4,000 meals just today.”

    “We saw people truly struggling as they worked to recover and heal,” said Maj. Todd Leathermon, chaplain with the 59th Medical Wing. “There was a clear need, and this gave us a chance to use the skills we’ve gained both through Air Force training and our ministry experience before joining the military. Whether it’s providing spiritual and emotional support, helping prepare meals, or simply being present, we’re here to care for them.”

    Meanwhile, in Hunt, three JBSA-led teams entered flood-damaged zones to help clear debris and aid in search and recovery efforts.

    “I’ve always wanted to join special forces, and this is great experience for me as I plan to cross-train in that field,” said Staff Sgt. Roberto Castro, with the 426th Cyberspace Operations Squadron. “I’ve been through several hurricanes so I understand how devastating they can be. I just thought, why not help out where I can?”

    Though the tasks varied — from chopping vegetables to hauling debris — the heart behind the mission remained the same.

    Throughout the day, chaplains remained available to volunteers and locals, ready to offer a listening ear or a quiet moment of spiritual care.

    “It’s been incredible to see all levels of government come together from our local law enforcement, military members, and even our brethren from Mexican emergency services to help bring closure to families,” said Master Sgt. James Newcomb, superintendent of cyber support operations. “For me, it’s meaningful because this is my duty. As military members, it’s our job to give back to the community — to help, serve, protect, support and defend the American people.” 

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI: Morien Announces Strategic Aggregate Partnership

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    HALIFAX, Nova Scotia, July 17, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Morien Resources Corp. (“Morien” or the “Company“) (TSX-V:MOX) is pleased to announce that it has entered into a strategic partnership with a large, U.S. based, regional crushed stone (“aggregate”) operator to jointly identify and permit long-life crushed stone opportunities in Atlantic Canada.

    Morien has pursued new relationships leveraging its regional expertise and longstanding relationships across Nova Scotia and Atlantic Canada. This effort is aligned with its commitment to unlocking the potential of Atlantic Canada’s high-quality mineral resources that can serve both domestic and export infrastructure markets.

    This partnership positions Morien to capitalize on Atlantic Canada’s strategic location, deep-water access, and high-quality stone resources to meet rising infrastructure demands in both Canada and the eastern U.S.

    In May 2025, the provincial government of Nova Scotia expanded its support of the mining industry by identifying aggregate as a “Strategic Mineral” under its Critical Minerals Strategy, a commodity that Nova Scotia now deems important for its economy and future development.

    The collaboration has already yielded promising results. One aggregate (granite) project in Nova Scotia has advanced to formal technical and stakeholder engagement with environmental and permitting groundwork now underway. A second aggregate (limestone) project in Newfoundland is currently progressing through due-diligence, including early-stage technical and commercial assessment.

    Under the terms of the strategic partnership agreement, Morien will receive a milestone payment upon the successful permitting of certain designated projects and is entitled to an industry competitive production royalty on future sales over the life of the operation. Morien’s time and expenses associated with each project are reimbursed by its partner. This arrangement is consistent with Morien’s focus on disciplined project selection and its partner-driven business model that maximizes long-term value while maintaining its lean operating model.

    The Company expects to provide further updates as milestones are achieved within this new aggregate initiative.

    About Morien

    Morien is a Nova Scotia based, mining development company created in 2012 to be a vehicle of direct prosperity for Nova Scotians, its largest shareholder group. Led by Nova Scotians, Morien’s primary assets are a royalty on the sale of coal from the Donkin Mine in Cape Breton, Nova Scotia, and a royalty on the sale of aggregate from the permitted Black Point Project, in Guysborough County, Nova Scotia. Morien’s management team exercises ruthless discipline in managing both the assets and liabilities of the Company. The Company’s management and its Board of Directors consider shareholder returns to be paramount over corporate size, number or scale of assets and industry recognition. The Company has 51,292,000 issued and outstanding common shares and a fully diluted position of 53,992,000. Further information is available at www.MorienRes.com.

    Forward-Looking Statements

    Some of the statements in this news release may constitute “forward-looking information” as defined under applicable securities laws. These statements reflect Morien’s current expectations of future revenues and business prospects and opportunities and are based on information currently available to Morien. Morien cautions that actual performance will be affected by a number of factors, many of which are beyond its control, and that future events and results may vary substantially from what Morien currently foresees. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in forward-looking statements include risks and uncertainties described in documents filed by Morien with the Canadian securities regulators on SEDAR+ (www.sedarplus.com) from time to time. Morien cautions that its royalty revenue will be based on production by third party property owners and operators who will be responsible for determining the manner and timing for the properties forming part of Morien’s royalty portfolio. These third party owners and operators are also subject to risk factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those predicted herein including: volatility in financial markets or general economic conditions; capital requirements and the need for additional financing; fluctuations in the rates of exchange for the currencies of Canada and the United States; prices for commodities including coal and aggregate; unanticipated changes in production, mineral reserves and mineral resources, metallurgical recoveries and/or exploration results; changes in regulations and unpredictable political or economic developments; loss of key personnel; labour disputes; and ineffective title to mineral claims or property. There are other business risks and hazards associated with mineral exploration, development and mining. Although Morien believes that the forward-looking information contained herein is based on reasonable assumptions (including assumptions relating to economic, market and political conditions, the Company’s working capital requirements and the accuracy of information supplied by the operators of the properties in which the Company has a royalty interest), readers cannot be assured that actual results will be consistent with such statements. Morien expressly disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking information in this news release, whether as a result of new information, events or otherwise, except in accordance with applicable securities laws. All dollar values discussed herein are in Canadian dollars. Any financial outlook or future-oriented financial information in this news release, as defined by applicable securities laws, has been approved by management of Morien as of the date of this news release. Such financial outlook or future-oriented financial information is provided for the purpose of providing information about management’s current expectations and plans relating to the future. Readers are cautioned that such outlook or information should not be used for purposes other than for which it is disclosed in this news release.

    Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

    For more information, please contact:

    Dawson Brisco, President & CEO
    Phone: (902) 403-3149
    dbrisco@MorienRes.com
    or
    John P.A. Budreski, Executive Chairman
    Phone: (416) 930-0914
    www.MorienRes.com

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI: DT Midstream to Announce Second Quarter 2025 Financial Results, Schedules Earnings Call

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    DETROIT, July 17, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — DT Midstream, Inc. (NYSE: DTM) plans to announce second quarter 2025 financial results before the market opens on Thursday, July 31, 2025.

    DT Midstream has scheduled a conference call to discuss results for 9:00 a.m. ET (8:00 a.m. CT) the same day. Investors, the news media and the public may listen to a live internet broadcast of the call at this link. The participant toll-free telephone dial-in number in the U.S. and Canada is 888.596.4144, and the toll number is 646.968.2525; the passcode is 9881735. International access numbers are available here.

    The webcast will be archived on the DT Midstream website at investor.dtmidstream.com. 

    About DT Midstream

    DT Midstream (NYSE: DTM) is an owner, operator and developer of natural gas interstate and intrastate pipelines, storage and gathering systems, compression, treatment and surface facilities. The company transports clean natural gas for utilities, power plants, marketers, large industrial customers and energy producers across the Southern, Northeastern and Midwestern United States and Canada. The Detroit-based company offers a comprehensive, wellhead-to-market array of services, including natural gas transportation, storage and gathering. DT Midstream is transitioning towards net zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050, including a plan of achieving 30% of its carbon emissions reduction by 2030. For more information, please visit the DT Midstream website at www.dtmidstream.com.

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI: Morien Receives Notice from Kameron to Explore Sale of Donkin Mine Interest

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    HALIFAX, Nova Scotia, July 17, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Morien Resources Corp. (“Morien” or the “Company“) (TSX-V:MOX) reports that it has received notice from Kameron Collieries ULC (“Kameron”), owner and operator of the Donkin Coal Mine (the “Donkin Mine”) in Nova Scotia, of Kameron’s intent to explore a sale of its 100% ownership in the Donkin Mine.

    Under the terms of the Royalty Agreement between Morien and Kameron, Morien holds a 2-4% production royalty on coal sales from the Donkin Mine. This royalty is binding upon Kameron and successor owners of the Donkin Mine and will continue if there is a change in ownership.

    The Company understands that Kameron is in the early stages of initiating the sale process and has not yet entered into any binding sale agreement with a third party. Kameron’s parent company, The Cline Group (“Cline”), has engaged U.S.-based Perella Weinberg Partners to lead the sales process.

    Morien will publish further information on the sale process when it becomes available and as the process advances. There is no assurance that the sale process will result in a completed transaction, nor can Morien provide guidance on timing, transaction terms, or expected outcomes at this stage, or the impact of the sale process or any completed sale on the prospects for the Donkin Mine to restart operations.  

    About Morien

    Morien is a Nova Scotia based, mining development company created in 2012 to be a vehicle of direct prosperity for Nova Scotians, its largest shareholder group. Led by Nova Scotians, Morien’s primary assets are a royalty on the sale of coal from Donkin in Cape Breton, Nova Scotia, and a royalty on the sale of aggregate from the permitted Black Point Project, in Guysborough County, Nova Scotia. Morien’s management team exercises ruthless discipline in managing both the assets and liabilities of the Company. The Company’s management and its Board of Directors consider shareholder returns to be paramount over corporate size, number or scale of assets and industry recognition. The Company has 51,292,000 issued and outstanding common shares and a fully diluted position of 53,992,000. Further information is available at www.MorienRes.com.

    Forward-Looking Statements

    Some of the statements in this news release may constitute “forward-looking information” as defined under applicable securities laws. These statements reflect Morien’s current expectations of future revenues and business prospects and opportunities and are based on information currently available to Morien. Morien cautions that actual performance will be affected by a number of factors, many of which are beyond its control, and that future events and results may vary substantially from what Morien currently foresees. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in forward-looking statements include risks and uncertainties described in documents filed by Morien with the Canadian securities regulators on SEDAR+ (www.sedarplus.com) from time to time. Morien cautions that its royalty revenue will be based on production by third party property owners and operators who will be responsible for determining the manner and timing for the properties forming part of Morien’s royalty portfolio. These third party owners and operators are also subject to risk factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those predicted herein including: volatility in financial markets or general economic conditions; capital requirements and the need for additional financing; fluctuations in the rates of exchange for the currencies of Canada and the United States; prices for commodities including coal and aggregate; unanticipated changes in production, mineral reserves and mineral resources, metallurgical recoveries and/or exploration results; changes in regulations and unpredictable political or economic developments; loss of key personnel; labour disputes; and ineffective title to mineral claims or property. There are other business risks and hazards associated with mineral exploration, development and mining. Although Morien believes that the forward-looking information contained herein is based on reasonable assumptions (including assumptions relating to economic, market and political conditions, the Company’s working capital requirements and the accuracy of information supplied by the operators of the properties in which the Company has a royalty interest), readers cannot be assured that actual results will be consistent with such statements. Morien expressly disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking information in this news release, whether as a result of new information, events or otherwise, except in accordance with applicable securities laws. All dollar values discussed herein are in Canadian dollars. Any financial outlook or future-oriented financial information in this news release, as defined by applicable securities laws, has been approved by management of Morien as of the date of this news release. Such financial outlook or future-oriented financial information is provided for the purpose of providing information about management’s current expectations and plans relating to the future. Readers are cautioned that such outlook or information should not be used for purposes other than for which it is disclosed in this news release.

    Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

    For more information, please contact:

    Dawson Brisco, President & CEO
    Phone: (902) 403-3149
    dbrisco@MorienRes.com
    or
    John P.A. Budreski, Executive Chairman
    Phone: (416) 930-0914
    www.MorienRes.com

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI USA: Cortez Masto: Republicans’ Claw Back of Bipartisan Funding will Hurt Families, Make Nevadans Less Safe

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Nevada Cortez Masto

    Washington, D.C. – U.S. Senator Catherine Cortez Masto (D-Nev.) voted against the Republican rescission package, which would cut already-approved bipartisan funding for public TV and radio as well as for global humanitarian aid. The legislation, which now heads back to the U.S. House of Representatives, would cut support for critical educational and public safety programs in Nevada.

    “Today, Republicans voted to slash funds that help rural communities, Tribes, families with kids, and farmers across the country. Public broadcasting funding in particular plays a critical role in delivering emergency alerts and keeping communities across Nevada safe,” said Senator Cortez Masto. “This vote also sets the dangerous precedent that Republicans can claw back funding that was already approved by Congress with bipartisan support. Nevadans deserve better.”

    The Republican rescission package would cut foreign aid programs that support American farmers, help thousands of vulnerable children worldwide, and help counter the influence of countries like Communist China abroad.

    The bill would slash over $7.5 million from public broadcasting in Nevada – including from Nevada Public Radio (KNPR), KUNR, Reno PBS TV, and Vegas PBS TV. The cuts would in turn affect rural communities whose radio and TV stations rely on public broadcasting funding – including stations in Laughlin, Mesquite, Elko, Tonopah, Round Mountain, and more. Eliminating these critical dollars will make it harder to get safety information and warnings to Nevadans in the cases of emergencies, AMBER Alerts, and natural disasters like wildfires. Public TV and radio also serve as critical resources that provide educational programming to children and families across the state. The average cost to the American taxpayer for public broadcasting is about $1.60 per person per year.

    “The elimination of CPB funding is a direct threat to Nevada Public Radio’s ability to cover news across our state—especially in rural communities, many of which are already considered news deserts. This decision undermines the essential role public media plays in connecting Nevadans with trusted, fact-based journalism and independent reporting that commercial media often overlooks. While CPB accounts for about 8% of our funding, its loss will be felt far beyond our budget—it jeopardizes our capacity to tell the stories of underrepresented communities, hold institutions accountable, and sustain meaningful reporting in places where no other outlet exists,” said Favian Perez, CEO & President of Nevada Public Radio.

    “We are beyond disappointed that despite the work of Senators Cortez Masto and Rosen, a majority of the Senate has decided to ignore the will of the American people and vote to defund public broadcasting. Due to this action thousands of Nevada’s families may lose access to the quality educational programs, services and emergency alerting notices provided by public television. This decision will have a negative impact on the quality of life in our state,” said Kurt A. Mische, President & CEO of PBS Reno.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI: Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc. Announces Second Quarter 2025 Results

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Second quarter 2025 net income of $77.3 million and net income available to common stockholders
    of $73.0 million, up 86% and 95%, respectively, year-over-year

    Second quarter 2025 EPS of $1.58 per diluted share and adjusted EPS(1)of $1.63 per
    diluted share, up 98% and 104%, respectively, year-over-year

    Strong balance sheet growth with total loans increasing 7% quarter-over-quarter and 10% year-over-year

    Book Value and Tangible Book Value(2)per share both increasing 13% year-over-year, reaching record levels

    DALLAS, July 17, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc. (NASDAQ: TCBI), the parent company of Texas Capital Bank, announced operating results for the second quarter of 2025.

    “Our multi-year focus on building a differentiated, full-service financial services firm has strengthened our client franchise and consistently delivered high-quality outcomes across our platform, driving strong financial performance this quarter,” said Rob C. Holmes, Chairman, President & CEO. “The strategic actions we’ve taken have structurally enhanced our earnings power, and as we enter the second half of the year, the breadth of our capabilities and the strength of our balance sheet position us to deliver durable, through-cycle results for both clients and shareholders.”

      2nd Quarter   1st Quarter   2nd Quarter
    (dollars in thousands except per share data)   2025       2025       2024  
    OPERATING RESULTS          
    Net income $ 77,328     $ 47,047     $ 41,662  
    Net income available to common stockholders $ 73,016     $ 42,734     $ 37,350  
    Pre-provision net revenue(3) $ 117,188     $ 77,458     $ 78,597  
    Diluted earnings per common share $ 1.58     $ 0.92     $ 0.80  
    Diluted common shares   46,215,394       46,616,704       46,872,498  
    Return on average assets   0.99 %     0.61 %     0.56 %
    Return on average common equity   9.17 %     5.56 %     5.26 %
               
    OPERATING RESULTS, ADJUSTED(1)          
    Net income $ 79,841     $ 47,047     $ 42,020  
    Net income available to common stockholders $ 75,529     $ 42,734     $ 37,708  
    Pre-provision net revenue(3) $ 120,475     $ 77,458     $ 79,059  
    Diluted earnings per common share $ 1.63     $ 0.92     $ 0.80  
    Diluted common shares   46,215,394       46,616,704       46,872,498  
    Return on average assets   1.02 %     0.61 %     0.57 %
    Return on average common equity   9.48 %     5.56 %     5.31 %
               
    BALANCE SHEET          
    Loans held for investment $ 18,035,945     $ 17,654,243     $ 16,700,569  
    Loans held for investment, mortgage finance   5,889,589       4,725,541       5,078,161  
    Total loans held for investment   23,925,534       22,379,784       21,778,730  
    Loans held for sale               36,785  
    Total assets   31,943,535       31,375,749       29,854,994  
    Non-interest bearing deposits   7,718,006       7,874,780       7,987,715  
    Total deposits   26,064,309       26,053,034       23,818,327  
    Stockholders’ equity   3,510,070       3,429,774       3,175,601  
               

    (1) These adjusted measures are non-GAAP measures. Please refer to “GAAP to Non-GAAP Reconciliations” for the computations of these adjusted measures and the reconciliation of these non-GAAP measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measure.
    (2) Stockholders’ equity excluding preferred stock, less goodwill and intangibles, divided by shares outstanding at period end.
    (3) Net interest income plus non-interest income, less non-interest expense.

    SECOND QUARTER 2025 COMPARED TO FIRST QUARTER 2025

    For the second quarter of 2025, net income available to common stockholders was $73.0 million, or $1.58 per diluted share, compared to $42.7 million, or $0.92 per diluted share, for the first quarter of 2025.

    Provision for credit losses for the second quarter of 2025 was $15.0 million, compared to $17.0 million for the first quarter of 2025. The $15.0 million provision for credit losses recorded in the second quarter of 2025 resulted primarily from an increase in total loans held for investment (“LHI”) and $13.0 million in net charge-offs, partially offset by a decrease in criticized loans.

    Net interest income was $253.4 million for the second quarter of 2025, compared to $236.0 million for the first quarter of 2025, primarily due to increases in average earning assets and earning asset yields, a decrease in average short-term borrowings and the impact of one additional day in the second quarter. Net interest margin for the second quarter of 2025 was 3.35%, an increase of 16 basis points from the first quarter of 2025. LHI, excluding mortgage finance, yields decreased 4 basis points from the first quarter of 2025 and LHI, mortgage finance, yields increased 49 basis points from the first quarter of 2025. Total cost of deposits was 2.65% for the second quarter of 2025, an 11 basis point decrease from the first quarter of 2025.

    Non-interest income for the second quarter of 2025 increased $9.6 million compared to the first quarter of 2025 primarily due to increases in investment banking and advisory fees and trading income, partially offset by a $1.9 million loss on sale of available-for-sale debt securities recognized during the second quarter of 2025.

    Non-interest expense for the second quarter of 2025 decreased $12.7 million compared to the first quarter of 2025, primarily due to decreases in salaries and benefits, related to the effect of seasonal payroll expenses that peak in the first quarter, and legal and professional expense, partially offset by an increase in other non-interest expense.

    SECOND QUARTER 2025 COMPARED TO SECOND QUARTER 2024

    Net income available to common stockholders was $73.0 million, or $1.58 per diluted share, for the second quarter of 2025, compared to $37.4 million, or $0.80 per diluted share, for the second quarter of 2024.

    The second quarter of 2025 included a $15.0 million provision for credit losses, reflecting an increase in total LHI and $13.0 million in net charge-offs, partially offset by a decline in criticized loans, compared to a $20.0 million provision for credit losses for the second quarter of 2024.

    Net interest income increased to $253.4 million for the second quarter of 2025, compared to $216.6 million for the second quarter of 2024, primarily due to an increase in average earning assets and a decrease in funding costs, partially offset by an increase in average interest bearing liabilities. Net interest margin increased 34 basis points to 3.35% for the second quarter of 2025, as compared to the second quarter of 2024. LHI, excluding mortgage finance, yields decreased 44 basis points compared to the second quarter of 2024 and LHI, mortgage finance yields increased 48 basis points from the second quarter of 2024. Total cost of deposits decreased 34 basis points compared to the second quarter of 2024.

    Non-interest income for the second quarter of 2025 increased $3.6 million compared to the second quarter of 2024 primarily due to increases in service charges on deposit accounts, trading income and other non-interest income, partially offset by the loss on sale of available-for-sale debt securities mentioned above.

    Non-interest expense for the second quarter of 2025 increased $1.9 million compared to the second quarter of 2024, primarily due to increases in salaries and benefits, occupancy expense and communications and technology expense, partially offset by a decrease in marketing expense.

    CREDIT QUALITY

    Net charge-offs of $13.0 million were recorded during the second quarter of 2025, compared to net charge-offs of $9.8 million and $12.0 million during the first quarter of 2025 and the second quarter of 2024, respectively. Criticized loans totaled $637.5 million at June 30, 2025, compared to $762.9 million at March 31, 2025 and $859.7 million at June 30, 2024. Non-accrual LHI totaled $113.6 million at June 30, 2025, compared to $93.6 million at March 31, 2025 and $85.0 million at June 30, 2024. The ratio of non-accrual LHI to total LHI for the second quarter of 2025 was 0.47%, compared to 0.42% for the first quarter of 2025 and 0.39% for the second quarter of 2024. The ratio of total allowance for credit losses to total LHI was 1.40% at June 30, 2025, compared to 1.48% and 1.44% at March 31, 2025 and June 30, 2024, respectively.

    REGULATORY RATIOS AND CAPITAL

    All regulatory ratios continue to be in excess of “well capitalized” requirements as of June 30, 2025. CET1, tier 1 capital, total capital and leverage ratios were 11.4%, 12.9%, 15.3% and 11.8%, respectively, at June 30, 2025, compared to 11.6%, 13.1%, 15.6% and 11.8%, respectively, at March 31, 2025 and 11.6%, 13.1%, 15.7% and 12.2%, respectively, at June 30, 2024. At June 30, 2025, our ratio of tangible common equity to total tangible assets was 10.1%, compared to 10.0% at March 31, 2025 and 9.6% at June 30, 2024.

    During the second quarter of 2025, the Company repurchased 317,860 shares of its common stock for an aggregate purchase price, including excise tax expense, of $21.0 million, at a weighted average price of $65.50 per share.

    About Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc.

    Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc. (NASDAQ®: TCBI), a member of the Russell 2000®Index and the S&P MidCap 400®, is the parent company of Texas Capital Bank (“TCB”). Texas Capital is the collective brand name for TCB and its separate, non-bank affiliates and wholly-owned subsidiaries. Texas Capital is a full-service financial services firm that delivers customized solutions to businesses, entrepreneurs and individual customers. Founded in 1998, the institution is headquartered in Dallas with offices in Austin, Houston, San Antonio, and Fort Worth, and has built a network of clients across the country. With the ability to service clients through their entire lifecycles, Texas Capital has established commercial banking, consumer banking, investment banking and wealth management capabilities.

    Forward Looking Statements

    This communication contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of and pursuant to the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 regarding, among other things, TCBI’s financial condition, results of operations, business plans and future performance. These statements are not historical in nature and may often be identified by the use of words such as “believes,” “projects,” “expects,” “may,” “estimates,” “should,” “plans,” “targets,” “intends” “could,” “would,” “anticipates,” “potential,” “confident,” “optimistic” or the negative thereof, or other variations thereon, or comparable terminology, or by discussions of strategy, objectives, estimates, trends, guidance, expectations and future plans.

    Because forward-looking statements relate to future results and occurrences, they are subject to inherent and various uncertainties, risks, and changes in circumstances that are difficult to predict, may change over time, are based on management’s expectations and assumptions at the time the statements are made and are not guarantees of future results. Numerous risks and other factors, many of which are beyond management’s control, could cause actual results to differ materially from future results expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. While there can be no assurance that any list of risks is complete, important risks and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contemplated by forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to: economic or business conditions in Texas, the United States or globally that impact TCBI or its customers; negative credit quality developments arising from the foregoing or other factors, including recent trade policies and their impact on our customers; TCBI’s ability to effectively manage its liquidity and maintain adequate regulatory capital to support its businesses; TCBI’s ability to pursue and execute upon growth plans, whether as a function of capital, liquidity or other limitations; TCBI’s ability to successfully execute its business strategy, including its strategic plan and developing and executing new lines of business and new products and services and potential strategic acquisitions; the extensive regulations to which TCBI is subject and its ability to comply with applicable governmental regulations, including legislative and regulatory changes; TCBI’s ability to effectively manage information technology systems, including third party vendors, cyber or data privacy incidents or other failures, disruptions or security breaches; TCBI’s ability to use technology to provide products and services to its customers; risks related to the development and use of artificial intelligence; changes in interest rates, including the impact of interest rates on TCBI’s securities portfolio and funding costs, as well as related balance sheet implications stemming from the fair value of our assets and liabilities; the effectiveness of TCBI’s risk management processes strategies and monitoring; fluctuations in commercial and residential real estate values, especially as they relate to the value of collateral supporting TCBI’s loans; the failure to identify, attract and retain key personnel and other employees; adverse developments in the banking industry and the potential impact of such developments on customer confidence, liquidity and regulatory responses to these developments, including in the context of regulatory examinations and related findings and actions; negative press and social media attention with respect to the banking industry or TCBI, in particular; claims, litigation or regulatory investigations and actions that TCBI may become subject to; severe weather, natural disasters, climate change, acts of war, terrorism, global or other geopolitical conflicts, or other external events, as well as related legislative and regulatory initiatives; and the risks and factors more fully described in TCBI’s most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and other documents and filings with the SEC. The information contained in this communication speaks only as of its date. Except to the extent required by applicable law or regulation, we disclaim any obligation to update such factors or to publicly announce the results of any revisions to any of the forward-looking statements included herein to reflect future events or developments.

    TEXAS CAPITAL BANCSHARES, INC.
    SELECTED FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS (UNAUDITED)
    (dollars in thousands except per share data)
      2nd Quarter 1st Quarter 4th Quarter 3rd Quarter 2nd Quarter
        2025     2025     2024     2024     2024  
    CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME          
    Interest income $ 439,567   $ 427,289   $ 437,571   $ 452,533   $ 422,068  
    Interest expense   186,172     191,255     207,964     212,431     205,486  
    Net interest income   253,395     236,034     229,607     240,102     216,582  
    Provision for credit losses   15,000     17,000     18,000     10,000     20,000  
    Net interest income after provision for credit losses   238,395     219,034     211,607     230,102     196,582  
    Non-interest income   54,069     44,444     54,074     (114,771 )   50,424  
    Non-interest expense   190,276     203,020     172,159     195,324     188,409  
    Income/(loss) before income taxes   102,188     60,458     93,522     (79,993 )   58,597  
    Income tax expense/(benefit)   24,860     13,411     22,499     (18,674 )   16,935  
    Net income/(loss)   77,328     47,047     71,023     (61,319 )   41,662  
    Preferred stock dividends   4,312     4,313     4,312     4,313     4,312  
    Net income/(loss) available to common stockholders $ 73,016   $ 42,734   $ 66,711   $ (65,632 ) $ 37,350  
    Diluted earnings/(loss) per common share $ 1.58   $ 0.92   $ 1.43   $ (1.41 ) $ 0.80  
    Diluted common shares   46,215,394     46,616,704     46,770,961     46,608,742     46,872,498  
    CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET DATA          
    Total assets $ 31,943,535   $ 31,375,749   $ 30,731,883   $ 31,629,299   $ 29,854,994  
    Loans held for investment   18,035,945     17,654,243     17,234,492     16,764,512     16,700,569  
    Loans held for investment, mortgage finance   5,889,589     4,725,541     5,215,574     5,529,659     5,078,161  
    Loans held for sale               9,022     36,785  
    Interest bearing cash and cash equivalents   2,507,691     3,600,969     3,012,307     3,894,537     2,691,352  
    Investment securities   4,608,628     4,531,219     4,396,115     4,405,520     4,388,976  
    Non-interest bearing deposits   7,718,006     7,874,780     7,485,428     9,070,804     7,987,715  
    Total deposits   26,064,309     26,053,034     25,238,599     25,865,255     23,818,327  
    Short-term borrowings   1,250,000     750,000     885,000     1,035,000     1,675,000  
    Long-term debt   620,256     660,521     660,346     660,172     659,997  
    Stockholders’ equity   3,510,070     3,429,774     3,367,936     3,354,044     3,175,601  
               
    End of period shares outstanding   45,746,836     46,024,933     46,233,812     46,207,757     46,188,078  
    Book value per share $ 70.17   $ 68.00   $ 66.36   $ 66.09   $ 62.26  
    Tangible book value per share(1) $ 70.14   $ 67.97   $ 66.32   $ 66.06   $ 62.23  
    SELECTED FINANCIAL RATIOS          
    Net interest margin   3.35 %   3.19 %   2.93 %   3.16 %   3.01 %
    Return on average assets   0.99 %   0.61 %   0.88 % (0.78 )%   0.56 %
    Return on average assets, adjusted(4)   1.02 %   0.61 %   0.88 %   1.00 %   0.57 %
    Return on average common equity   9.17 %   5.56 %   8.50 % (8.87 )%   5.26 %
    Return on average common equity, adjusted(4)   9.48 %   5.56 %   8.50 %   10.04 %   5.31 %
    Efficiency ratio(2)   61.9 %   72.4 %   60.7 %   155.8 %   70.6 %
    Efficiency ratio, adjusted(2)(4)   61.1 %   72.4 %   60.7 %   62.3 %   70.4 %
    Non-interest income to average earning assets   0.72 %   0.60 %   0.69 % (1.52 )%   0.71 %
    Non-interest income to average earning assets, adjusted(4)   0.74 %   0.60 %   0.69 %   0.86 %   0.71 %
    Non-interest expense to average earning assets   2.52 %   2.75 %   2.21 %   2.59 %   2.65 %
    Non-interest expense to average earning assets, adjusted(4)   2.50 %   2.75 %   2.21 %   2.52 %   2.65 %
    Common equity to total assets   10.1 %   10.0 %   10.0 %   9.7 %   9.6 %
    Tangible common equity to total tangible assets(3)   10.1 %   10.0 %   10.0 %   9.7 %   9.6 %
    Common Equity Tier 1   11.4 %   11.6 %   11.4 %   11.2 %   11.6 %
    Tier 1 capital   12.9 %   13.1 %   12.8 %   12.6 %   13.1 %
    Total capital   15.3 %   15.6 %   15.4 %   15.2 %   15.7 %
    Leverage   11.8 %   11.8 %   11.3 %   11.4 %   12.2 %

    (1) Stockholders’ equity excluding preferred stock, less goodwill and intangibles, divided by shares outstanding at period end.
    (2) Non-interest expense divided by the sum of net interest income and non-interest income.
    (3) Stockholders’ equity excluding preferred stock, less goodwill and intangibles, divided by total assets, less goodwill and intangibles.
    (4) These adjusted measures are non-GAAP measures. Please refer to “GAAP to Non-GAAP Reconciliations” for the computations of these adjusted measures and the reconciliation of these non-GAAP measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measure.

    TEXAS CAPITAL BANCSHARES, INC.
    CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED)
    (dollars in thousands)
      June 30,
    2025
    March 31,
    2025
    December 31,
    2024
    September 30,
    2024
    June 30,
    2024
    Assets          
    Cash and due from banks $ 182,451   $ 201,504   $ 176,501   $ 297,048   $ 221,727  
    Interest bearing cash and cash equivalents   2,507,691     3,600,969     3,012,307     3,894,537     2,691,352  
    Available-for-sale debt securities   3,774,141     3,678,378     3,524,686     3,518,662     3,483,231  
    Held-to-maturity debt securities   761,907     779,354     796,168     812,432     831,513  
    Equity securities   68,692     71,679     75,261     74,426     74,232  
    Trading securities   3,888     1,808              
    Investment securities   4,608,628     4,531,219     4,396,115     4,405,520     4,388,976  
    Loans held for sale               9,022     36,785  
    Loans held for investment, mortgage finance   5,889,589     4,725,541     5,215,574     5,529,659     5,078,161  
    Loans held for investment   18,035,945     17,654,243     17,234,492     16,764,512     16,700,569  
    Less: Allowance for credit losses on loans   277,648     278,379     271,709     273,143     267,297  
    Loans held for investment, net   23,647,886     22,101,405     22,178,357     22,021,028     21,511,433  
    Premises and equipment, net   86,831     84,575     85,443     81,577     69,464  
    Accrued interest receivable and other assets   908,552     854,581     881,664     919,071     933,761  
    Goodwill and intangibles, net   1,496     1,496     1,496     1,496     1,496  
    Total assets $ 31,943,535   $ 31,375,749   $ 30,731,883   $ 31,629,299   $ 29,854,994  
               
    Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity          
    Liabilities:          
    Non-interest bearing deposits $ 7,718,006   $ 7,874,780   $ 7,485,428   $ 9,070,804   $ 7,987,715  
    Interest bearing deposits   18,346,303     18,178,254     17,753,171     16,794,451     15,830,612  
    Total deposits   26,064,309     26,053,034     25,238,599     25,865,255     23,818,327  
    Accrued interest payable   14,120     25,270     23,680     18,679     23,841  
    Other liabilities   484,780     457,150     556,322     696,149     502,228  
    Short-term borrowings   1,250,000     750,000     885,000     1,035,000     1,675,000  
    Long-term debt   620,256     660,521     660,346     660,172     659,997  
    Total liabilities   28,433,465     27,945,975     27,363,947     28,275,255     26,679,393  
               
    Stockholders’ equity:          
    Preferred stock, $.01 par value, $1,000 liquidation value:          
    Authorized shares – 10,000,000          
    Issued shares(1)   300,000     300,000     300,000     300,000     300,000  
    Common stock, $.01 par value:          
    Authorized shares – 100,000,000          
    Issued shares(2)   517     517     515     515     515  
    Additional paid-in capital   1,065,083     1,060,028     1,056,719     1,054,614     1,050,114  
    Retained earnings   2,611,401     2,538,385     2,495,651     2,428,940     2,494,572  
    Treasury stock(3)   (354,000 )   (332,994 )   (301,842 )   (301,868 )   (301,868 )
    Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of taxes   (112,931 )   (136,162 )   (183,107 )   (128,157 )   (367,732 )
    Total stockholders’ equity   3,510,070     3,429,774     3,367,936     3,354,044     3,175,601  
    Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $ 31,943,535   $ 31,375,749   $ 30,731,883   $ 31,629,299   $ 29,854,994  
               
    (1) Preferred stock – issued shares   300,000     300,000     300,000     300,000     300,000  
    (2) Common stock – issued shares   51,747,305     51,707,542     51,520,315     51,494,260     51,474,581  
    (3) Treasury stock – shares at cost   6,000,469     5,682,609     5,286,503     5,286,503     5,286,503  
    TEXAS CAPITAL BANCSHARES, INC.        
    CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (UNAUDITED)        
    (dollars in thousands except per share data)        
      Three Months Ended June 30, Six Months Ended June 30,
        2025   2024   2025   2024
    Interest income        
    Interest and fees on loans $ 364,358   $ 345,251 $ 698,508   $ 676,130
    Investment securities   45,991     33,584   92,556     65,728
    Interest bearing cash and cash equivalents   29,218     43,233   75,792     97,588
    Total interest income   439,567     422,068   866,856     839,446
    Interest expense        
    Deposits   174,798     181,280   349,734     356,880
    Short-term borrowings   3,444     12,749   11,690     25,532
    Long-term debt   7,930     11,457   16,003     25,443
    Total interest expense   186,172     205,486   377,427     407,855
    Net interest income   253,395     216,582   489,429     431,591
    Provision for credit losses   15,000     20,000   32,000     39,000
    Net interest income after provision for credit losses   238,395     196,582   457,429     392,591
    Non-interest income        
    Service charges on deposit accounts   8,182     5,911   16,022     12,250
    Wealth management and trust fee income   3,730     3,699   7,694     7,266
    Brokered loan fees   2,398     2,131   4,347     4,042
    Investment banking and advisory fees   24,109     25,048   40,587     43,472
    Trading income   7,896     5,650   13,835     10,362
    Available-for-sale debt securities losses   (1,886 )     (1,886 )  
    Other   9,640     7,985   17,914     14,351
    Total non-interest income   54,069     50,424   98,513     91,743
    Non-interest expense        
    Salaries and benefits   120,154     118,840   251,795     247,567
    Occupancy expense   12,144     10,666   22,988     20,403
    Marketing   3,624     5,996   8,633     12,032
    Legal and professional   11,069     11,273   26,058     27,468
    Communications and technology   24,314     22,013   47,956     43,127
    Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insurance assessment   5,096     5,570   10,437     13,991
    Other   13,875     14,051   25,429     26,214
    Total non-interest expense   190,276     188,409   393,296     390,802
    Income before income taxes   102,188     58,597   162,646     93,532
    Income tax expense   24,860     16,935   38,271     25,728
    Net income   77,328     41,662   124,375     67,804
    Preferred stock dividends   4,312     4,312   8,625     8,625
    Net income available to common stockholders $ 73,016   $ 37,350 $ 115,750   $ 59,179
             
    Basic earnings per common share $ 1.59   $ 0.80 $ 2.52   $ 1.26
    Diluted earnings per common share $ 1.58   $ 0.80 $ 2.49   $ 1.25
    TEXAS CAPITAL BANCSHARES, INC.
    SUMMARY OF CREDIT LOSS EXPERIENCE
    (dollars in thousands)
      2nd Quarter 1st Quarter 4th Quarter 3rd Quarter 2nd Quarter
        2025     2025     2024     2024     2024  
    Allowance for credit losses on loans:          
    Beginning balance $ 278,379   $ 271,709   $ 273,143   $ 267,297   $ 263,962  
    Allowance established for acquired purchase credit deterioration loans               2,579      
    Loans charged-off:          
    Commercial   13,020     10,197     14,100     6,120     9,997  
    Commercial real estate   431     500     2,566     262     2,111  
    Consumer               30      
    Total charge-offs   13,451     10,697     16,666     6,412     12,108  
    Recoveries:          
    Commercial   486     483     4,562     329     153  
    Commercial real estate       413     18          
    Consumer       4     15          
    Total recoveries   486     900     4,595     329     153  
    Net charge-offs   12,965     9,797     12,071     6,083     11,955  
    Provision for credit losses on loans   12,234     16,467     10,637     9,350     15,290  
    Ending balance $ 277,648   $ 278,379   $ 271,709   $ 273,143   $ 267,297  
               
    Allowance for off-balance sheet credit losses:          
    Beginning balance $ 53,865   $ 53,332   $ 45,969   $ 45,319   $ 40,609  
    Provision for off-balance sheet credit losses   2,766     533     7,363     650     4,710  
    Ending balance $ 56,631   $ 53,865   $ 53,332   $ 45,969   $ 45,319  
               
    Total allowance for credit losses $ 334,279   $ 332,244   $ 325,041   $ 319,112   $ 312,616  
    Total provision for credit losses $ 15,000   $ 17,000   $ 18,000   $ 10,000   $ 20,000  
               
    Allowance for credit losses on loans to total loans held for investment   1.16 %   1.24 %   1.21 %   1.23 %   1.23 %
    Allowance for credit losses on loans to average total loans held for investment   1.19 %   1.29 %   1.22 %   1.24 %   1.27 %
    Net charge-offs to average total loans held for investment(1)   0.22 %   0.18 %   0.22 %   0.11 %   0.23 %
    Net charge-offs to average total loans held for investment for last 12 months(1)   0.18 %   0.18 %   0.19 %   0.20 %   0.22 %
    Total provision for credit losses to average total loans held for investment(1)   0.26 %   0.32 %   0.32 %   0.18 %   0.38 %
    Total allowance for credit losses to total loans held for investment   1.40 %   1.48 %   1.45 %   1.43 %   1.44 %

    (1) Interim period ratios are annualized.

    TEXAS CAPITAL BANCSHARES, INC.          
    NON-PERFORMING ASSETS, PAST DUE LOANS AND CRITICIZED LOANS      
    (dollars in thousands)          
      2nd Quarter 1st Quarter 4th Quarter 3rd Quarter 2nd Quarter
        2025     2025     2024     2024     2024  
    NON-PERFORMING ASSETS          
    Non-accrual loans held for investment $ 113,609   $ 93,565   $ 111,165   $ 88,960   $ 85,021  
    Non-accrual loans held for sale                    
    Other real estate owned                    
    Total non-performing assets $ 113,609   $ 93,565   $ 111,165   $ 88,960   $ 85,021  
               
    Non-accrual loans held for investment to total loans held for investment   0.47 %   0.42 %   0.50 %   0.40 %   0.39 %
    Total non-performing assets to total assets   0.36 %   0.30 %   0.36 %   0.28 %   0.28 %
    Allowance for credit losses on loans to non-accrual loans held for investment 2.4x 3.0x 2.4x 3.1x 3.1x
    Total allowance for credit losses to non-accrual loans held for investment 2.9x 3.6x 2.9x 3.6x 3.7x
               
    LOANS PAST DUE          
    Loans held for investment past due 90 days and still accruing $ 2,068   $ 791   $ 4,265   $ 5,281   $ 286  
    Loans held for investment past due 90 days to total loans held for investment   0.01 %   %   0.02 %   0.02 %   %
    Loans held for sale past due 90 days and still accruing $   $   $   $   $ 64  
               
    CRITICIZED LOANS          
    Criticized loans $ 637,462   $ 762,887   $ 713,951   $ 897,727   $ 859,671  
    Criticized loans to total loans held for investment   2.66 %   3.41 %   3.18 %   4.03 %   3.95 %
    Special mention loans $ 339,923   $ 484,165   $ 435,626   $ 579,802   $ 593,305  
    Special mention loans to total loans held for investment   1.42 %   2.16 %   1.94 %   2.60 %   2.72 %
    TEXAS CAPITAL BANCSHARES, INC.
    CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (UNAUDITED)
    (dollars in thousands)
               
      2nd Quarter 1st Quarter 4th Quarter 3rd Quarter 2nd Quarter
        2025   2025 2024   2024   2024
    Interest income          
    Interest and fees on loans $ 364,358   $ 334,150 $ 340,388 $ 361,407   $ 345,251
    Investment securities   45,991     46,565   44,102   38,389     33,584
    Interest bearing deposits in other banks   29,218     46,574   53,081   52,737     43,233
    Total interest income   439,567     427,289   437,571   452,533     422,068
    Interest expense          
    Deposits   174,798     174,936   189,061   190,255     181,280
    Short-term borrowings   3,444     8,246   10,678   13,784     12,749
    Long-term debt   7,930     8,073   8,225   8,392     11,457
    Total interest expense   186,172     191,255   207,964   212,431     205,486
    Net interest income   253,395     236,034   229,607   240,102     216,582
    Provision for credit losses   15,000     17,000   18,000   10,000     20,000
    Net interest income after provision for credit losses   238,395     219,034   211,607   230,102     196,582
    Non-interest income          
    Service charges on deposit accounts   8,182     7,840   6,989   6,307     5,911
    Wealth management and trust fee income   3,730     3,964   4,009   4,040     3,699
    Brokered loan fees   2,398     1,949   2,519   2,400     2,131
    Investment banking and advisory fees   24,109     16,478   26,740   34,753     25,048
    Trading income   7,896     5,939   5,487   5,786     5,650
    Available-for-sale debt securities losses   (1,886 )       (179,581 )  
    Other   9,640     8,274   8,330   11,524     7,985
    Total non-interest income   54,069     44,444   54,074   (114,771 )   50,424
    Non-interest expense          
    Salaries and benefits   120,154     131,641   97,873   121,138     118,840
    Occupancy expense   12,144     10,844   11,926   12,937     10,666
    Marketing   3,624     5,009   4,454   5,863     5,996
    Legal and professional   11,069     14,989   15,180   11,135     11,273
    Communications and technology   24,314     23,642   24,007   25,951     22,013
    Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insurance assessment   5,096     5,341   4,454   4,906     5,570
    Other   13,875     11,554   14,265   13,394     14,051
    Total non-interest expense   190,276     203,020   172,159   195,324     188,409
    Income/(loss) before income taxes   102,188     60,458   93,522   (79,993 )   58,597
    Income tax expense/(benefit)   24,860     13,411   22,499   (18,674 )   16,935
    Net income/(loss)   77,328     47,047   71,023   (61,319 )   41,662
    Preferred stock dividends   4,312     4,313   4,312   4,313     4,312
    Net income/(loss) available to common shareholders $ 73,016   $ 42,734 $ 66,711 $ (65,632 ) $ 37,350
    TEXAS CAPITAL BANCSHARES, INC.
    TAXABLE EQUIVALENT NET INTEREST INCOME ANALYSIS (UNAUDITED)(1)
    (dollars in thousands)
      2nd Quarter 2025   1st Quarter 2025   2nd Quarter 2024   YTD June 30, 2025   YTD June 30, 2024
      Average
    Balance
    Income/
    Expense
    Yield/
    Rate
      Average
    Balance
    Income/
    Expense
    Yield/
    Rate
      Average
    Balance
    Income/
    Expense
    Yield/
    Rate
      Average
    Balance
    Income/
    Expense
    Yield/
    Rate
      Average
    Balance
    Income/
    Expense
    Yield/
    Rate
    Assets                                      
    Investment securities(2) $ 4,573,164 $ 45,999 3.93 %   $ 4,463,876 $ 46,565 4.10 %   $ 4,427,023 $ 33,584 2.80 %   $ 4,518,822 $ 92,564 4.01 %   $ 4,363,195 $ 65,728 2.79 %
    Interest bearing cash and cash equivalents   2,661,037   29,218 4.40 %     4,255,796   46,574 4.44 %     3,273,069   43,233 5.31 %     3,454,011   75,792 4.43 %     3,662,348   97,588 5.36 %
    Loans held for sale     %     335   2 2.97 %     28,768   683 9.55 %     167   2 2.97 %     39,966   1,867 9.40 %
    Loans held for investment, mortgage finance   5,327,559   58,707 4.42 %     3,972,106   38,527 3.93 %     4,357,288   42,722 3.94 %     4,653,577   97,234 4.21 %     3,937,498   74,177 3.79 %
    Loans held for investment(3)   18,018,626   306,142 6.81 %     17,527,070   296,091 6.85 %     16,750,788   301,910 7.25 %     17,774,206   602,233 6.83 %     16,636,438   600,216 7.26 %
    Less: Allowance for credit losses on loans   278,035   %     272,758         263,145   %     275,411         256,541    
    Loans held for investment, net   23,068,150   364,849 6.34 %     21,226,418   334,618 6.39 %     20,844,931   344,632 6.65 %     22,152,372   699,467 6.37 %     20,317,395   674,393 6.68 %
    Total earning assets   30,302,351   440,066 5.80 %     29,946,425   427,759 5.76 %     28,573,791   422,132 5.86 %     30,125,372   867,825 5.78 %     28,382,904   839,576 5.87 %
    Cash and other assets   1,117,118         1,157,184         1,177,061         1,137,040         1,117,763    
    Total assets $ 31,419,469       $ 31,103,609       $ 29,750,852       $ 31,262,412       $ 29,500,667    
                                           
    Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity                                      
    Transaction deposits $ 2,213,037 $ 13,731 2.49 %   $ 2,163,250 $ 13,908 2.61 %   $ 2,061,622 $ 16,982 3.31 %   $ 2,188,282 $ 27,639 2.55 %   $ 2,034,057 $ 33,840 3.35 %
    Savings deposits   13,727,095   134,272 3.92 %     13,357,243   133,577 4.06 %     11,981,668   143,173 4.81 %     13,543,190   267,849 3.99 %     11,695,673   279,963 4.81 %
    Time deposits   2,361,525   26,795 4.55 %     2,329,384   27,451 4.78 %     1,658,899   21,125 5.12 %     2,345,543   54,246 4.66 %     1,689,112   43,077 5.13 %
    Total interest bearing deposits   18,301,657   174,798 3.83 %     17,849,877   174,936 3.97 %     15,702,189   181,280 4.64 %     18,077,015   349,734 3.90 %     15,418,842   356,880 4.65 %
    Short-term borrowings   306,176   3,444 4.51 %     751,500   8,246 4.45 %     927,253   12,749 5.53 %     527,608   11,690 4.47 %     919,670   25,532 5.58 %
    Long-term debt   649,469   7,930 4.90 %     660,445   8,073 4.96 %     778,401   11,457 5.92 %     654,927   16,003 4.93 %     818,955   25,443 6.25 %
    Total interest bearing liabilities   19,257,302   186,172 3.88 %     19,261,822   191,255 4.03 %     17,407,843   205,486 4.75 %     19,259,550   377,427 3.95 %     17,157,467   407,855 4.78 %
    Non-interest bearing deposits   8,191,402         7,875,244         8,647,594         8,034,196         8,642,685    
    Other liabilities   475,724         552,154         537,754         513,728         523,520    
    Stockholders’ equity   3,495,041         3,414,389         3,157,661         3,454,938         3,176,995    
    Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $ 31,419,469       $ 31,103,609       $ 29,750,852       $ 31,262,412       $ 29,500,667    
    Net interest income   $ 253,894       $ 236,504       $ 216,646       $ 490,398       $ 431,721  
    Net interest margin     3.35 %       3.19 %       3.01 %       3.27 %       3.02 %

    (1) Taxable equivalent rates used where applicable.
    (2) Yields on investment securities are calculated using available-for-sale securities at amortized cost.
    (3) Average balances include non-accrual loans.

    GAAP TO NON-GAAP RECONCILIATIONS

    The following items are non-GAAP financial measures: adjusted non-interest income, adjusted non-interest expense, adjusted net income, adjusted net income available to common stockholders, adjusted pre-provision net revenue (“PPNR”), adjusted diluted earnings/(loss) per common share, adjusted return on average assets, adjusted return on average common equity, adjusted efficiency ratio, adjusted non-interest income to average earning assets and adjusted non-interest expense to average earning assets. These are not measures recognized under GAAP and therefore are considered non-GAAP financial measures. The table below provides a reconciliation of these non-GAAP financial measures to the most comparable GAAP measures.

    These non-GAAP financial measures are adjusted for certain items, listed below, that management believes are non-operating in nature and not representative of its actual operating performance. Management believes that these non-GAAP financial measures provide meaningful additional information about Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc. to assist management and investors in evaluating operating results, financial strength, business performance and capital position. Non-GAAP financial measures have inherent limitations, are not required to be uniformly applied and are not audited. As such, these non-GAAP financial measures should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for analyses of operating results or capital position as reported under GAAP.

    Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures      
    (dollars in thousands except per share data) 2nd Quarter
    2025
    1st Quarter
    2025
    4th Quarter
    2024
    3rd Quarter
    2024
    2nd Quarter
    2024
    Net interest income $ 253,395   $ 236,034   $ 229,607   $ 240,102   $ 216,582  
               
    Non-interest income   54,069     44,444     54,074     (114,771 )   50,424  
    Available-for-sale debt securities losses, net   1,886             179,581      
    Non-interest income, adjusted   55,955     44,444     54,074     64,810     50,424  
               
    Non-interest expense   190,276     203,020     172,159     195,324     188,409  
    FDIC special assessment               651     (462 )
    Restructuring expenses   (1,401 )           (5,923 )    
    Non-interest expense, adjusted   188,875     203,020     172,159     190,052     187,947  
               
    Provision for credit losses   15,000     17,000     18,000     10,000     20,000  
               
    Income tax expense/(benefit)   24,860     13,411     22,499     (18,674 )   16,935  
    Tax effect of adjustments   774             44,880     104  
    Income tax expense/(benefit), adjusted   25,634     13,411     22,499     26,206     17,039  
               
    Net income/(loss)(1) $ 77,328   $ 47,047   $ 71,023   $ (61,319 ) $ 41,662  
    Net income/(loss), adjusted(1) $ 79,841   $ 47,047   $ 71,023   $ 78,654   $ 42,020  
               
    Preferred stock dividends   4,312     4,313     4,312     4,313     4,312  
               
    Net income/(loss) to common stockholders(2) $ 73,016   $ 42,734   $ 66,711   $ (65,632 ) $ 37,350  
    Net income/(loss) to common stockholders, adjusted(2) $ 75,529   $ 42,734   $ 66,711   $ 74,341   $ 37,708  
               
    PPNR(3) $ 117,188   $ 77,458   $ 111,522   $ (69,993 ) $ 78,597  
    PPNR(3), adjusted $ 120,475   $ 77,458   $ 111,522   $ 114,860   $ 79,059  
               
    Weighted average common shares outstanding, diluted   46,215,394     46,616,704     46,770,961     46,608,742     46,872,498  
    Diluted earnings/(loss) per common share $ 1.58   $ 0.92   $ 1.43   $ (1.41 ) $ 0.80  
    Diluted earnings/(loss) per common share, adjusted $ 1.63   $ 0.92   $ 1.43   $ 1.59   $ 0.80  
               
    Average total assets $ 31,419,469   $ 31,103,609   $ 32,212,087   $ 31,215,173   $ 29,750,852  
    Return on average assets   0.99 %   0.61 %   0.88 % (0.78 )%   0.56 %
    Return on average assets, adjusted   1.02 %   0.61 %   0.88 %   1.00 %   0.57 %
               
    Average common equity $ 3,195,041   $ 3,114,389   $ 3,120,933   $ 2,945,238   $ 2,857,661  
    Return on average common equity   9.17 %   5.56 %   8.50 % (8.87 )%   5.26 %
    Return on average common equity, adjusted   9.48 %   5.56 %   8.50 %   10.04 %   5.31 %
               
    Efficiency ratio(4)   61.9 %   72.4 %   60.7 %   155.8 %   70.6 %
    Efficiency ratio, adjusted(4)   61.1 %   72.4 %   60.7 %   62.3 %   70.4 %
               
    Average earning assets $ 30,302,351   $ 29,946,425   $ 31,033,803   $ 29,975,318   $ 28,573,791  
    Non-interest income to average earning assets   0.72 %   0.60 %   0.69 % (1.52 )%   0.71 %
    Non-interest income to average earning assets, adjusted   0.74 %   0.60 %   0.69 %   0.86 %   0.71 %
    Non-interest expense to average earning assets   2.52 %   2.75 %   2.21 %   2.59 %   2.65 %
    Non-interest expense to average earning assets, adjusted   2.50 %   2.75 %   2.21 %   2.52 %   2.65 %

    (1) Net interest income plus non-interest income, less non-interest expense, provision for credit losses and income tax expense/(benefit). On an adjusted basis, net interest income plus non-interest income, adjusted, less non-interest expense, adjusted, provision for credit losses and income tax expense/(benefit), adjusted.
    (2) Net income/(loss), less preferred stock dividends. On an adjusted basis, net income/(loss), adjusted, less preferred stock dividends.
    (3) Net interest income plus non-interest income, less non-interest expense. On an adjusted basis, net interest income plus non-interest income, adjusted, less non-interest expense, adjusted.
    (4) Non-interest expense divided by the sum of net interest income and non-interest income. On an adjusted basis, non-interest expense, adjusted, divided by the sum of net interest income and non-interest income, adjusted.

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI: Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc. Announces Second Quarter 2025 Results

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Second quarter 2025 net income of $77.3 million and net income available to common stockholders
    of $73.0 million, up 86% and 95%, respectively, year-over-year

    Second quarter 2025 EPS of $1.58 per diluted share and adjusted EPS(1)of $1.63 per
    diluted share, up 98% and 104%, respectively, year-over-year

    Strong balance sheet growth with total loans increasing 7% quarter-over-quarter and 10% year-over-year

    Book Value and Tangible Book Value(2)per share both increasing 13% year-over-year, reaching record levels

    DALLAS, July 17, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc. (NASDAQ: TCBI), the parent company of Texas Capital Bank, announced operating results for the second quarter of 2025.

    “Our multi-year focus on building a differentiated, full-service financial services firm has strengthened our client franchise and consistently delivered high-quality outcomes across our platform, driving strong financial performance this quarter,” said Rob C. Holmes, Chairman, President & CEO. “The strategic actions we’ve taken have structurally enhanced our earnings power, and as we enter the second half of the year, the breadth of our capabilities and the strength of our balance sheet position us to deliver durable, through-cycle results for both clients and shareholders.”

      2nd Quarter   1st Quarter   2nd Quarter
    (dollars in thousands except per share data)   2025       2025       2024  
    OPERATING RESULTS          
    Net income $ 77,328     $ 47,047     $ 41,662  
    Net income available to common stockholders $ 73,016     $ 42,734     $ 37,350  
    Pre-provision net revenue(3) $ 117,188     $ 77,458     $ 78,597  
    Diluted earnings per common share $ 1.58     $ 0.92     $ 0.80  
    Diluted common shares   46,215,394       46,616,704       46,872,498  
    Return on average assets   0.99 %     0.61 %     0.56 %
    Return on average common equity   9.17 %     5.56 %     5.26 %
               
    OPERATING RESULTS, ADJUSTED(1)          
    Net income $ 79,841     $ 47,047     $ 42,020  
    Net income available to common stockholders $ 75,529     $ 42,734     $ 37,708  
    Pre-provision net revenue(3) $ 120,475     $ 77,458     $ 79,059  
    Diluted earnings per common share $ 1.63     $ 0.92     $ 0.80  
    Diluted common shares   46,215,394       46,616,704       46,872,498  
    Return on average assets   1.02 %     0.61 %     0.57 %
    Return on average common equity   9.48 %     5.56 %     5.31 %
               
    BALANCE SHEET          
    Loans held for investment $ 18,035,945     $ 17,654,243     $ 16,700,569  
    Loans held for investment, mortgage finance   5,889,589       4,725,541       5,078,161  
    Total loans held for investment   23,925,534       22,379,784       21,778,730  
    Loans held for sale               36,785  
    Total assets   31,943,535       31,375,749       29,854,994  
    Non-interest bearing deposits   7,718,006       7,874,780       7,987,715  
    Total deposits   26,064,309       26,053,034       23,818,327  
    Stockholders’ equity   3,510,070       3,429,774       3,175,601  
               

    (1) These adjusted measures are non-GAAP measures. Please refer to “GAAP to Non-GAAP Reconciliations” for the computations of these adjusted measures and the reconciliation of these non-GAAP measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measure.
    (2) Stockholders’ equity excluding preferred stock, less goodwill and intangibles, divided by shares outstanding at period end.
    (3) Net interest income plus non-interest income, less non-interest expense.

    SECOND QUARTER 2025 COMPARED TO FIRST QUARTER 2025

    For the second quarter of 2025, net income available to common stockholders was $73.0 million, or $1.58 per diluted share, compared to $42.7 million, or $0.92 per diluted share, for the first quarter of 2025.

    Provision for credit losses for the second quarter of 2025 was $15.0 million, compared to $17.0 million for the first quarter of 2025. The $15.0 million provision for credit losses recorded in the second quarter of 2025 resulted primarily from an increase in total loans held for investment (“LHI”) and $13.0 million in net charge-offs, partially offset by a decrease in criticized loans.

    Net interest income was $253.4 million for the second quarter of 2025, compared to $236.0 million for the first quarter of 2025, primarily due to increases in average earning assets and earning asset yields, a decrease in average short-term borrowings and the impact of one additional day in the second quarter. Net interest margin for the second quarter of 2025 was 3.35%, an increase of 16 basis points from the first quarter of 2025. LHI, excluding mortgage finance, yields decreased 4 basis points from the first quarter of 2025 and LHI, mortgage finance, yields increased 49 basis points from the first quarter of 2025. Total cost of deposits was 2.65% for the second quarter of 2025, an 11 basis point decrease from the first quarter of 2025.

    Non-interest income for the second quarter of 2025 increased $9.6 million compared to the first quarter of 2025 primarily due to increases in investment banking and advisory fees and trading income, partially offset by a $1.9 million loss on sale of available-for-sale debt securities recognized during the second quarter of 2025.

    Non-interest expense for the second quarter of 2025 decreased $12.7 million compared to the first quarter of 2025, primarily due to decreases in salaries and benefits, related to the effect of seasonal payroll expenses that peak in the first quarter, and legal and professional expense, partially offset by an increase in other non-interest expense.

    SECOND QUARTER 2025 COMPARED TO SECOND QUARTER 2024

    Net income available to common stockholders was $73.0 million, or $1.58 per diluted share, for the second quarter of 2025, compared to $37.4 million, or $0.80 per diluted share, for the second quarter of 2024.

    The second quarter of 2025 included a $15.0 million provision for credit losses, reflecting an increase in total LHI and $13.0 million in net charge-offs, partially offset by a decline in criticized loans, compared to a $20.0 million provision for credit losses for the second quarter of 2024.

    Net interest income increased to $253.4 million for the second quarter of 2025, compared to $216.6 million for the second quarter of 2024, primarily due to an increase in average earning assets and a decrease in funding costs, partially offset by an increase in average interest bearing liabilities. Net interest margin increased 34 basis points to 3.35% for the second quarter of 2025, as compared to the second quarter of 2024. LHI, excluding mortgage finance, yields decreased 44 basis points compared to the second quarter of 2024 and LHI, mortgage finance yields increased 48 basis points from the second quarter of 2024. Total cost of deposits decreased 34 basis points compared to the second quarter of 2024.

    Non-interest income for the second quarter of 2025 increased $3.6 million compared to the second quarter of 2024 primarily due to increases in service charges on deposit accounts, trading income and other non-interest income, partially offset by the loss on sale of available-for-sale debt securities mentioned above.

    Non-interest expense for the second quarter of 2025 increased $1.9 million compared to the second quarter of 2024, primarily due to increases in salaries and benefits, occupancy expense and communications and technology expense, partially offset by a decrease in marketing expense.

    CREDIT QUALITY

    Net charge-offs of $13.0 million were recorded during the second quarter of 2025, compared to net charge-offs of $9.8 million and $12.0 million during the first quarter of 2025 and the second quarter of 2024, respectively. Criticized loans totaled $637.5 million at June 30, 2025, compared to $762.9 million at March 31, 2025 and $859.7 million at June 30, 2024. Non-accrual LHI totaled $113.6 million at June 30, 2025, compared to $93.6 million at March 31, 2025 and $85.0 million at June 30, 2024. The ratio of non-accrual LHI to total LHI for the second quarter of 2025 was 0.47%, compared to 0.42% for the first quarter of 2025 and 0.39% for the second quarter of 2024. The ratio of total allowance for credit losses to total LHI was 1.40% at June 30, 2025, compared to 1.48% and 1.44% at March 31, 2025 and June 30, 2024, respectively.

    REGULATORY RATIOS AND CAPITAL

    All regulatory ratios continue to be in excess of “well capitalized” requirements as of June 30, 2025. CET1, tier 1 capital, total capital and leverage ratios were 11.4%, 12.9%, 15.3% and 11.8%, respectively, at June 30, 2025, compared to 11.6%, 13.1%, 15.6% and 11.8%, respectively, at March 31, 2025 and 11.6%, 13.1%, 15.7% and 12.2%, respectively, at June 30, 2024. At June 30, 2025, our ratio of tangible common equity to total tangible assets was 10.1%, compared to 10.0% at March 31, 2025 and 9.6% at June 30, 2024.

    During the second quarter of 2025, the Company repurchased 317,860 shares of its common stock for an aggregate purchase price, including excise tax expense, of $21.0 million, at a weighted average price of $65.50 per share.

    About Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc.

    Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc. (NASDAQ®: TCBI), a member of the Russell 2000®Index and the S&P MidCap 400®, is the parent company of Texas Capital Bank (“TCB”). Texas Capital is the collective brand name for TCB and its separate, non-bank affiliates and wholly-owned subsidiaries. Texas Capital is a full-service financial services firm that delivers customized solutions to businesses, entrepreneurs and individual customers. Founded in 1998, the institution is headquartered in Dallas with offices in Austin, Houston, San Antonio, and Fort Worth, and has built a network of clients across the country. With the ability to service clients through their entire lifecycles, Texas Capital has established commercial banking, consumer banking, investment banking and wealth management capabilities.

    Forward Looking Statements

    This communication contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of and pursuant to the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 regarding, among other things, TCBI’s financial condition, results of operations, business plans and future performance. These statements are not historical in nature and may often be identified by the use of words such as “believes,” “projects,” “expects,” “may,” “estimates,” “should,” “plans,” “targets,” “intends” “could,” “would,” “anticipates,” “potential,” “confident,” “optimistic” or the negative thereof, or other variations thereon, or comparable terminology, or by discussions of strategy, objectives, estimates, trends, guidance, expectations and future plans.

    Because forward-looking statements relate to future results and occurrences, they are subject to inherent and various uncertainties, risks, and changes in circumstances that are difficult to predict, may change over time, are based on management’s expectations and assumptions at the time the statements are made and are not guarantees of future results. Numerous risks and other factors, many of which are beyond management’s control, could cause actual results to differ materially from future results expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. While there can be no assurance that any list of risks is complete, important risks and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contemplated by forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to: economic or business conditions in Texas, the United States or globally that impact TCBI or its customers; negative credit quality developments arising from the foregoing or other factors, including recent trade policies and their impact on our customers; TCBI’s ability to effectively manage its liquidity and maintain adequate regulatory capital to support its businesses; TCBI’s ability to pursue and execute upon growth plans, whether as a function of capital, liquidity or other limitations; TCBI’s ability to successfully execute its business strategy, including its strategic plan and developing and executing new lines of business and new products and services and potential strategic acquisitions; the extensive regulations to which TCBI is subject and its ability to comply with applicable governmental regulations, including legislative and regulatory changes; TCBI’s ability to effectively manage information technology systems, including third party vendors, cyber or data privacy incidents or other failures, disruptions or security breaches; TCBI’s ability to use technology to provide products and services to its customers; risks related to the development and use of artificial intelligence; changes in interest rates, including the impact of interest rates on TCBI’s securities portfolio and funding costs, as well as related balance sheet implications stemming from the fair value of our assets and liabilities; the effectiveness of TCBI’s risk management processes strategies and monitoring; fluctuations in commercial and residential real estate values, especially as they relate to the value of collateral supporting TCBI’s loans; the failure to identify, attract and retain key personnel and other employees; adverse developments in the banking industry and the potential impact of such developments on customer confidence, liquidity and regulatory responses to these developments, including in the context of regulatory examinations and related findings and actions; negative press and social media attention with respect to the banking industry or TCBI, in particular; claims, litigation or regulatory investigations and actions that TCBI may become subject to; severe weather, natural disasters, climate change, acts of war, terrorism, global or other geopolitical conflicts, or other external events, as well as related legislative and regulatory initiatives; and the risks and factors more fully described in TCBI’s most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and other documents and filings with the SEC. The information contained in this communication speaks only as of its date. Except to the extent required by applicable law or regulation, we disclaim any obligation to update such factors or to publicly announce the results of any revisions to any of the forward-looking statements included herein to reflect future events or developments.

    TEXAS CAPITAL BANCSHARES, INC.
    SELECTED FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS (UNAUDITED)
    (dollars in thousands except per share data)
      2nd Quarter 1st Quarter 4th Quarter 3rd Quarter 2nd Quarter
        2025     2025     2024     2024     2024  
    CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME          
    Interest income $ 439,567   $ 427,289   $ 437,571   $ 452,533   $ 422,068  
    Interest expense   186,172     191,255     207,964     212,431     205,486  
    Net interest income   253,395     236,034     229,607     240,102     216,582  
    Provision for credit losses   15,000     17,000     18,000     10,000     20,000  
    Net interest income after provision for credit losses   238,395     219,034     211,607     230,102     196,582  
    Non-interest income   54,069     44,444     54,074     (114,771 )   50,424  
    Non-interest expense   190,276     203,020     172,159     195,324     188,409  
    Income/(loss) before income taxes   102,188     60,458     93,522     (79,993 )   58,597  
    Income tax expense/(benefit)   24,860     13,411     22,499     (18,674 )   16,935  
    Net income/(loss)   77,328     47,047     71,023     (61,319 )   41,662  
    Preferred stock dividends   4,312     4,313     4,312     4,313     4,312  
    Net income/(loss) available to common stockholders $ 73,016   $ 42,734   $ 66,711   $ (65,632 ) $ 37,350  
    Diluted earnings/(loss) per common share $ 1.58   $ 0.92   $ 1.43   $ (1.41 ) $ 0.80  
    Diluted common shares   46,215,394     46,616,704     46,770,961     46,608,742     46,872,498  
    CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET DATA          
    Total assets $ 31,943,535   $ 31,375,749   $ 30,731,883   $ 31,629,299   $ 29,854,994  
    Loans held for investment   18,035,945     17,654,243     17,234,492     16,764,512     16,700,569  
    Loans held for investment, mortgage finance   5,889,589     4,725,541     5,215,574     5,529,659     5,078,161  
    Loans held for sale               9,022     36,785  
    Interest bearing cash and cash equivalents   2,507,691     3,600,969     3,012,307     3,894,537     2,691,352  
    Investment securities   4,608,628     4,531,219     4,396,115     4,405,520     4,388,976  
    Non-interest bearing deposits   7,718,006     7,874,780     7,485,428     9,070,804     7,987,715  
    Total deposits   26,064,309     26,053,034     25,238,599     25,865,255     23,818,327  
    Short-term borrowings   1,250,000     750,000     885,000     1,035,000     1,675,000  
    Long-term debt   620,256     660,521     660,346     660,172     659,997  
    Stockholders’ equity   3,510,070     3,429,774     3,367,936     3,354,044     3,175,601  
               
    End of period shares outstanding   45,746,836     46,024,933     46,233,812     46,207,757     46,188,078  
    Book value per share $ 70.17   $ 68.00   $ 66.36   $ 66.09   $ 62.26  
    Tangible book value per share(1) $ 70.14   $ 67.97   $ 66.32   $ 66.06   $ 62.23  
    SELECTED FINANCIAL RATIOS          
    Net interest margin   3.35 %   3.19 %   2.93 %   3.16 %   3.01 %
    Return on average assets   0.99 %   0.61 %   0.88 % (0.78 )%   0.56 %
    Return on average assets, adjusted(4)   1.02 %   0.61 %   0.88 %   1.00 %   0.57 %
    Return on average common equity   9.17 %   5.56 %   8.50 % (8.87 )%   5.26 %
    Return on average common equity, adjusted(4)   9.48 %   5.56 %   8.50 %   10.04 %   5.31 %
    Efficiency ratio(2)   61.9 %   72.4 %   60.7 %   155.8 %   70.6 %
    Efficiency ratio, adjusted(2)(4)   61.1 %   72.4 %   60.7 %   62.3 %   70.4 %
    Non-interest income to average earning assets   0.72 %   0.60 %   0.69 % (1.52 )%   0.71 %
    Non-interest income to average earning assets, adjusted(4)   0.74 %   0.60 %   0.69 %   0.86 %   0.71 %
    Non-interest expense to average earning assets   2.52 %   2.75 %   2.21 %   2.59 %   2.65 %
    Non-interest expense to average earning assets, adjusted(4)   2.50 %   2.75 %   2.21 %   2.52 %   2.65 %
    Common equity to total assets   10.1 %   10.0 %   10.0 %   9.7 %   9.6 %
    Tangible common equity to total tangible assets(3)   10.1 %   10.0 %   10.0 %   9.7 %   9.6 %
    Common Equity Tier 1   11.4 %   11.6 %   11.4 %   11.2 %   11.6 %
    Tier 1 capital   12.9 %   13.1 %   12.8 %   12.6 %   13.1 %
    Total capital   15.3 %   15.6 %   15.4 %   15.2 %   15.7 %
    Leverage   11.8 %   11.8 %   11.3 %   11.4 %   12.2 %

    (1) Stockholders’ equity excluding preferred stock, less goodwill and intangibles, divided by shares outstanding at period end.
    (2) Non-interest expense divided by the sum of net interest income and non-interest income.
    (3) Stockholders’ equity excluding preferred stock, less goodwill and intangibles, divided by total assets, less goodwill and intangibles.
    (4) These adjusted measures are non-GAAP measures. Please refer to “GAAP to Non-GAAP Reconciliations” for the computations of these adjusted measures and the reconciliation of these non-GAAP measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measure.

    TEXAS CAPITAL BANCSHARES, INC.
    CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED)
    (dollars in thousands)
      June 30,
    2025
    March 31,
    2025
    December 31,
    2024
    September 30,
    2024
    June 30,
    2024
    Assets          
    Cash and due from banks $ 182,451   $ 201,504   $ 176,501   $ 297,048   $ 221,727  
    Interest bearing cash and cash equivalents   2,507,691     3,600,969     3,012,307     3,894,537     2,691,352  
    Available-for-sale debt securities   3,774,141     3,678,378     3,524,686     3,518,662     3,483,231  
    Held-to-maturity debt securities   761,907     779,354     796,168     812,432     831,513  
    Equity securities   68,692     71,679     75,261     74,426     74,232  
    Trading securities   3,888     1,808              
    Investment securities   4,608,628     4,531,219     4,396,115     4,405,520     4,388,976  
    Loans held for sale               9,022     36,785  
    Loans held for investment, mortgage finance   5,889,589     4,725,541     5,215,574     5,529,659     5,078,161  
    Loans held for investment   18,035,945     17,654,243     17,234,492     16,764,512     16,700,569  
    Less: Allowance for credit losses on loans   277,648     278,379     271,709     273,143     267,297  
    Loans held for investment, net   23,647,886     22,101,405     22,178,357     22,021,028     21,511,433  
    Premises and equipment, net   86,831     84,575     85,443     81,577     69,464  
    Accrued interest receivable and other assets   908,552     854,581     881,664     919,071     933,761  
    Goodwill and intangibles, net   1,496     1,496     1,496     1,496     1,496  
    Total assets $ 31,943,535   $ 31,375,749   $ 30,731,883   $ 31,629,299   $ 29,854,994  
               
    Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity          
    Liabilities:          
    Non-interest bearing deposits $ 7,718,006   $ 7,874,780   $ 7,485,428   $ 9,070,804   $ 7,987,715  
    Interest bearing deposits   18,346,303     18,178,254     17,753,171     16,794,451     15,830,612  
    Total deposits   26,064,309     26,053,034     25,238,599     25,865,255     23,818,327  
    Accrued interest payable   14,120     25,270     23,680     18,679     23,841  
    Other liabilities   484,780     457,150     556,322     696,149     502,228  
    Short-term borrowings   1,250,000     750,000     885,000     1,035,000     1,675,000  
    Long-term debt   620,256     660,521     660,346     660,172     659,997  
    Total liabilities   28,433,465     27,945,975     27,363,947     28,275,255     26,679,393  
               
    Stockholders’ equity:          
    Preferred stock, $.01 par value, $1,000 liquidation value:          
    Authorized shares – 10,000,000          
    Issued shares(1)   300,000     300,000     300,000     300,000     300,000  
    Common stock, $.01 par value:          
    Authorized shares – 100,000,000          
    Issued shares(2)   517     517     515     515     515  
    Additional paid-in capital   1,065,083     1,060,028     1,056,719     1,054,614     1,050,114  
    Retained earnings   2,611,401     2,538,385     2,495,651     2,428,940     2,494,572  
    Treasury stock(3)   (354,000 )   (332,994 )   (301,842 )   (301,868 )   (301,868 )
    Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of taxes   (112,931 )   (136,162 )   (183,107 )   (128,157 )   (367,732 )
    Total stockholders’ equity   3,510,070     3,429,774     3,367,936     3,354,044     3,175,601  
    Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $ 31,943,535   $ 31,375,749   $ 30,731,883   $ 31,629,299   $ 29,854,994  
               
    (1) Preferred stock – issued shares   300,000     300,000     300,000     300,000     300,000  
    (2) Common stock – issued shares   51,747,305     51,707,542     51,520,315     51,494,260     51,474,581  
    (3) Treasury stock – shares at cost   6,000,469     5,682,609     5,286,503     5,286,503     5,286,503  
    TEXAS CAPITAL BANCSHARES, INC.        
    CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (UNAUDITED)        
    (dollars in thousands except per share data)        
      Three Months Ended June 30, Six Months Ended June 30,
        2025   2024   2025   2024
    Interest income        
    Interest and fees on loans $ 364,358   $ 345,251 $ 698,508   $ 676,130
    Investment securities   45,991     33,584   92,556     65,728
    Interest bearing cash and cash equivalents   29,218     43,233   75,792     97,588
    Total interest income   439,567     422,068   866,856     839,446
    Interest expense        
    Deposits   174,798     181,280   349,734     356,880
    Short-term borrowings   3,444     12,749   11,690     25,532
    Long-term debt   7,930     11,457   16,003     25,443
    Total interest expense   186,172     205,486   377,427     407,855
    Net interest income   253,395     216,582   489,429     431,591
    Provision for credit losses   15,000     20,000   32,000     39,000
    Net interest income after provision for credit losses   238,395     196,582   457,429     392,591
    Non-interest income        
    Service charges on deposit accounts   8,182     5,911   16,022     12,250
    Wealth management and trust fee income   3,730     3,699   7,694     7,266
    Brokered loan fees   2,398     2,131   4,347     4,042
    Investment banking and advisory fees   24,109     25,048   40,587     43,472
    Trading income   7,896     5,650   13,835     10,362
    Available-for-sale debt securities losses   (1,886 )     (1,886 )  
    Other   9,640     7,985   17,914     14,351
    Total non-interest income   54,069     50,424   98,513     91,743
    Non-interest expense        
    Salaries and benefits   120,154     118,840   251,795     247,567
    Occupancy expense   12,144     10,666   22,988     20,403
    Marketing   3,624     5,996   8,633     12,032
    Legal and professional   11,069     11,273   26,058     27,468
    Communications and technology   24,314     22,013   47,956     43,127
    Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insurance assessment   5,096     5,570   10,437     13,991
    Other   13,875     14,051   25,429     26,214
    Total non-interest expense   190,276     188,409   393,296     390,802
    Income before income taxes   102,188     58,597   162,646     93,532
    Income tax expense   24,860     16,935   38,271     25,728
    Net income   77,328     41,662   124,375     67,804
    Preferred stock dividends   4,312     4,312   8,625     8,625
    Net income available to common stockholders $ 73,016   $ 37,350 $ 115,750   $ 59,179
             
    Basic earnings per common share $ 1.59   $ 0.80 $ 2.52   $ 1.26
    Diluted earnings per common share $ 1.58   $ 0.80 $ 2.49   $ 1.25
    TEXAS CAPITAL BANCSHARES, INC.
    SUMMARY OF CREDIT LOSS EXPERIENCE
    (dollars in thousands)
      2nd Quarter 1st Quarter 4th Quarter 3rd Quarter 2nd Quarter
        2025     2025     2024     2024     2024  
    Allowance for credit losses on loans:          
    Beginning balance $ 278,379   $ 271,709   $ 273,143   $ 267,297   $ 263,962  
    Allowance established for acquired purchase credit deterioration loans               2,579      
    Loans charged-off:          
    Commercial   13,020     10,197     14,100     6,120     9,997  
    Commercial real estate   431     500     2,566     262     2,111  
    Consumer               30      
    Total charge-offs   13,451     10,697     16,666     6,412     12,108  
    Recoveries:          
    Commercial   486     483     4,562     329     153  
    Commercial real estate       413     18          
    Consumer       4     15          
    Total recoveries   486     900     4,595     329     153  
    Net charge-offs   12,965     9,797     12,071     6,083     11,955  
    Provision for credit losses on loans   12,234     16,467     10,637     9,350     15,290  
    Ending balance $ 277,648   $ 278,379   $ 271,709   $ 273,143   $ 267,297  
               
    Allowance for off-balance sheet credit losses:          
    Beginning balance $ 53,865   $ 53,332   $ 45,969   $ 45,319   $ 40,609  
    Provision for off-balance sheet credit losses   2,766     533     7,363     650     4,710  
    Ending balance $ 56,631   $ 53,865   $ 53,332   $ 45,969   $ 45,319  
               
    Total allowance for credit losses $ 334,279   $ 332,244   $ 325,041   $ 319,112   $ 312,616  
    Total provision for credit losses $ 15,000   $ 17,000   $ 18,000   $ 10,000   $ 20,000  
               
    Allowance for credit losses on loans to total loans held for investment   1.16 %   1.24 %   1.21 %   1.23 %   1.23 %
    Allowance for credit losses on loans to average total loans held for investment   1.19 %   1.29 %   1.22 %   1.24 %   1.27 %
    Net charge-offs to average total loans held for investment(1)   0.22 %   0.18 %   0.22 %   0.11 %   0.23 %
    Net charge-offs to average total loans held for investment for last 12 months(1)   0.18 %   0.18 %   0.19 %   0.20 %   0.22 %
    Total provision for credit losses to average total loans held for investment(1)   0.26 %   0.32 %   0.32 %   0.18 %   0.38 %
    Total allowance for credit losses to total loans held for investment   1.40 %   1.48 %   1.45 %   1.43 %   1.44 %

    (1) Interim period ratios are annualized.

    TEXAS CAPITAL BANCSHARES, INC.          
    NON-PERFORMING ASSETS, PAST DUE LOANS AND CRITICIZED LOANS      
    (dollars in thousands)          
      2nd Quarter 1st Quarter 4th Quarter 3rd Quarter 2nd Quarter
        2025     2025     2024     2024     2024  
    NON-PERFORMING ASSETS          
    Non-accrual loans held for investment $ 113,609   $ 93,565   $ 111,165   $ 88,960   $ 85,021  
    Non-accrual loans held for sale                    
    Other real estate owned                    
    Total non-performing assets $ 113,609   $ 93,565   $ 111,165   $ 88,960   $ 85,021  
               
    Non-accrual loans held for investment to total loans held for investment   0.47 %   0.42 %   0.50 %   0.40 %   0.39 %
    Total non-performing assets to total assets   0.36 %   0.30 %   0.36 %   0.28 %   0.28 %
    Allowance for credit losses on loans to non-accrual loans held for investment 2.4x 3.0x 2.4x 3.1x 3.1x
    Total allowance for credit losses to non-accrual loans held for investment 2.9x 3.6x 2.9x 3.6x 3.7x
               
    LOANS PAST DUE          
    Loans held for investment past due 90 days and still accruing $ 2,068   $ 791   $ 4,265   $ 5,281   $ 286  
    Loans held for investment past due 90 days to total loans held for investment   0.01 %   %   0.02 %   0.02 %   %
    Loans held for sale past due 90 days and still accruing $   $   $   $   $ 64  
               
    CRITICIZED LOANS          
    Criticized loans $ 637,462   $ 762,887   $ 713,951   $ 897,727   $ 859,671  
    Criticized loans to total loans held for investment   2.66 %   3.41 %   3.18 %   4.03 %   3.95 %
    Special mention loans $ 339,923   $ 484,165   $ 435,626   $ 579,802   $ 593,305  
    Special mention loans to total loans held for investment   1.42 %   2.16 %   1.94 %   2.60 %   2.72 %
    TEXAS CAPITAL BANCSHARES, INC.
    CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (UNAUDITED)
    (dollars in thousands)
               
      2nd Quarter 1st Quarter 4th Quarter 3rd Quarter 2nd Quarter
        2025   2025 2024   2024   2024
    Interest income          
    Interest and fees on loans $ 364,358   $ 334,150 $ 340,388 $ 361,407   $ 345,251
    Investment securities   45,991     46,565   44,102   38,389     33,584
    Interest bearing deposits in other banks   29,218     46,574   53,081   52,737     43,233
    Total interest income   439,567     427,289   437,571   452,533     422,068
    Interest expense          
    Deposits   174,798     174,936   189,061   190,255     181,280
    Short-term borrowings   3,444     8,246   10,678   13,784     12,749
    Long-term debt   7,930     8,073   8,225   8,392     11,457
    Total interest expense   186,172     191,255   207,964   212,431     205,486
    Net interest income   253,395     236,034   229,607   240,102     216,582
    Provision for credit losses   15,000     17,000   18,000   10,000     20,000
    Net interest income after provision for credit losses   238,395     219,034   211,607   230,102     196,582
    Non-interest income          
    Service charges on deposit accounts   8,182     7,840   6,989   6,307     5,911
    Wealth management and trust fee income   3,730     3,964   4,009   4,040     3,699
    Brokered loan fees   2,398     1,949   2,519   2,400     2,131
    Investment banking and advisory fees   24,109     16,478   26,740   34,753     25,048
    Trading income   7,896     5,939   5,487   5,786     5,650
    Available-for-sale debt securities losses   (1,886 )       (179,581 )  
    Other   9,640     8,274   8,330   11,524     7,985
    Total non-interest income   54,069     44,444   54,074   (114,771 )   50,424
    Non-interest expense          
    Salaries and benefits   120,154     131,641   97,873   121,138     118,840
    Occupancy expense   12,144     10,844   11,926   12,937     10,666
    Marketing   3,624     5,009   4,454   5,863     5,996
    Legal and professional   11,069     14,989   15,180   11,135     11,273
    Communications and technology   24,314     23,642   24,007   25,951     22,013
    Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insurance assessment   5,096     5,341   4,454   4,906     5,570
    Other   13,875     11,554   14,265   13,394     14,051
    Total non-interest expense   190,276     203,020   172,159   195,324     188,409
    Income/(loss) before income taxes   102,188     60,458   93,522   (79,993 )   58,597
    Income tax expense/(benefit)   24,860     13,411   22,499   (18,674 )   16,935
    Net income/(loss)   77,328     47,047   71,023   (61,319 )   41,662
    Preferred stock dividends   4,312     4,313   4,312   4,313     4,312
    Net income/(loss) available to common shareholders $ 73,016   $ 42,734 $ 66,711 $ (65,632 ) $ 37,350
    TEXAS CAPITAL BANCSHARES, INC.
    TAXABLE EQUIVALENT NET INTEREST INCOME ANALYSIS (UNAUDITED)(1)
    (dollars in thousands)
      2nd Quarter 2025   1st Quarter 2025   2nd Quarter 2024   YTD June 30, 2025   YTD June 30, 2024
      Average
    Balance
    Income/
    Expense
    Yield/
    Rate
      Average
    Balance
    Income/
    Expense
    Yield/
    Rate
      Average
    Balance
    Income/
    Expense
    Yield/
    Rate
      Average
    Balance
    Income/
    Expense
    Yield/
    Rate
      Average
    Balance
    Income/
    Expense
    Yield/
    Rate
    Assets                                      
    Investment securities(2) $ 4,573,164 $ 45,999 3.93 %   $ 4,463,876 $ 46,565 4.10 %   $ 4,427,023 $ 33,584 2.80 %   $ 4,518,822 $ 92,564 4.01 %   $ 4,363,195 $ 65,728 2.79 %
    Interest bearing cash and cash equivalents   2,661,037   29,218 4.40 %     4,255,796   46,574 4.44 %     3,273,069   43,233 5.31 %     3,454,011   75,792 4.43 %     3,662,348   97,588 5.36 %
    Loans held for sale     %     335   2 2.97 %     28,768   683 9.55 %     167   2 2.97 %     39,966   1,867 9.40 %
    Loans held for investment, mortgage finance   5,327,559   58,707 4.42 %     3,972,106   38,527 3.93 %     4,357,288   42,722 3.94 %     4,653,577   97,234 4.21 %     3,937,498   74,177 3.79 %
    Loans held for investment(3)   18,018,626   306,142 6.81 %     17,527,070   296,091 6.85 %     16,750,788   301,910 7.25 %     17,774,206   602,233 6.83 %     16,636,438   600,216 7.26 %
    Less: Allowance for credit losses on loans   278,035   %     272,758         263,145   %     275,411         256,541    
    Loans held for investment, net   23,068,150   364,849 6.34 %     21,226,418   334,618 6.39 %     20,844,931   344,632 6.65 %     22,152,372   699,467 6.37 %     20,317,395   674,393 6.68 %
    Total earning assets   30,302,351   440,066 5.80 %     29,946,425   427,759 5.76 %     28,573,791   422,132 5.86 %     30,125,372   867,825 5.78 %     28,382,904   839,576 5.87 %
    Cash and other assets   1,117,118         1,157,184         1,177,061         1,137,040         1,117,763    
    Total assets $ 31,419,469       $ 31,103,609       $ 29,750,852       $ 31,262,412       $ 29,500,667    
                                           
    Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity                                      
    Transaction deposits $ 2,213,037 $ 13,731 2.49 %   $ 2,163,250 $ 13,908 2.61 %   $ 2,061,622 $ 16,982 3.31 %   $ 2,188,282 $ 27,639 2.55 %   $ 2,034,057 $ 33,840 3.35 %
    Savings deposits   13,727,095   134,272 3.92 %     13,357,243   133,577 4.06 %     11,981,668   143,173 4.81 %     13,543,190   267,849 3.99 %     11,695,673   279,963 4.81 %
    Time deposits   2,361,525   26,795 4.55 %     2,329,384   27,451 4.78 %     1,658,899   21,125 5.12 %     2,345,543   54,246 4.66 %     1,689,112   43,077 5.13 %
    Total interest bearing deposits   18,301,657   174,798 3.83 %     17,849,877   174,936 3.97 %     15,702,189   181,280 4.64 %     18,077,015   349,734 3.90 %     15,418,842   356,880 4.65 %
    Short-term borrowings   306,176   3,444 4.51 %     751,500   8,246 4.45 %     927,253   12,749 5.53 %     527,608   11,690 4.47 %     919,670   25,532 5.58 %
    Long-term debt   649,469   7,930 4.90 %     660,445   8,073 4.96 %     778,401   11,457 5.92 %     654,927   16,003 4.93 %     818,955   25,443 6.25 %
    Total interest bearing liabilities   19,257,302   186,172 3.88 %     19,261,822   191,255 4.03 %     17,407,843   205,486 4.75 %     19,259,550   377,427 3.95 %     17,157,467   407,855 4.78 %
    Non-interest bearing deposits   8,191,402         7,875,244         8,647,594         8,034,196         8,642,685    
    Other liabilities   475,724         552,154         537,754         513,728         523,520    
    Stockholders’ equity   3,495,041         3,414,389         3,157,661         3,454,938         3,176,995    
    Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $ 31,419,469       $ 31,103,609       $ 29,750,852       $ 31,262,412       $ 29,500,667    
    Net interest income   $ 253,894       $ 236,504       $ 216,646       $ 490,398       $ 431,721  
    Net interest margin     3.35 %       3.19 %       3.01 %       3.27 %       3.02 %

    (1) Taxable equivalent rates used where applicable.
    (2) Yields on investment securities are calculated using available-for-sale securities at amortized cost.
    (3) Average balances include non-accrual loans.

    GAAP TO NON-GAAP RECONCILIATIONS

    The following items are non-GAAP financial measures: adjusted non-interest income, adjusted non-interest expense, adjusted net income, adjusted net income available to common stockholders, adjusted pre-provision net revenue (“PPNR”), adjusted diluted earnings/(loss) per common share, adjusted return on average assets, adjusted return on average common equity, adjusted efficiency ratio, adjusted non-interest income to average earning assets and adjusted non-interest expense to average earning assets. These are not measures recognized under GAAP and therefore are considered non-GAAP financial measures. The table below provides a reconciliation of these non-GAAP financial measures to the most comparable GAAP measures.

    These non-GAAP financial measures are adjusted for certain items, listed below, that management believes are non-operating in nature and not representative of its actual operating performance. Management believes that these non-GAAP financial measures provide meaningful additional information about Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc. to assist management and investors in evaluating operating results, financial strength, business performance and capital position. Non-GAAP financial measures have inherent limitations, are not required to be uniformly applied and are not audited. As such, these non-GAAP financial measures should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for analyses of operating results or capital position as reported under GAAP.

    Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures      
    (dollars in thousands except per share data) 2nd Quarter
    2025
    1st Quarter
    2025
    4th Quarter
    2024
    3rd Quarter
    2024
    2nd Quarter
    2024
    Net interest income $ 253,395   $ 236,034   $ 229,607   $ 240,102   $ 216,582  
               
    Non-interest income   54,069     44,444     54,074     (114,771 )   50,424  
    Available-for-sale debt securities losses, net   1,886             179,581      
    Non-interest income, adjusted   55,955     44,444     54,074     64,810     50,424  
               
    Non-interest expense   190,276     203,020     172,159     195,324     188,409  
    FDIC special assessment               651     (462 )
    Restructuring expenses   (1,401 )           (5,923 )    
    Non-interest expense, adjusted   188,875     203,020     172,159     190,052     187,947  
               
    Provision for credit losses   15,000     17,000     18,000     10,000     20,000  
               
    Income tax expense/(benefit)   24,860     13,411     22,499     (18,674 )   16,935  
    Tax effect of adjustments   774             44,880     104  
    Income tax expense/(benefit), adjusted   25,634     13,411     22,499     26,206     17,039  
               
    Net income/(loss)(1) $ 77,328   $ 47,047   $ 71,023   $ (61,319 ) $ 41,662  
    Net income/(loss), adjusted(1) $ 79,841   $ 47,047   $ 71,023   $ 78,654   $ 42,020  
               
    Preferred stock dividends   4,312     4,313     4,312     4,313     4,312  
               
    Net income/(loss) to common stockholders(2) $ 73,016   $ 42,734   $ 66,711   $ (65,632 ) $ 37,350  
    Net income/(loss) to common stockholders, adjusted(2) $ 75,529   $ 42,734   $ 66,711   $ 74,341   $ 37,708  
               
    PPNR(3) $ 117,188   $ 77,458   $ 111,522   $ (69,993 ) $ 78,597  
    PPNR(3), adjusted $ 120,475   $ 77,458   $ 111,522   $ 114,860   $ 79,059  
               
    Weighted average common shares outstanding, diluted   46,215,394     46,616,704     46,770,961     46,608,742     46,872,498  
    Diluted earnings/(loss) per common share $ 1.58   $ 0.92   $ 1.43   $ (1.41 ) $ 0.80  
    Diluted earnings/(loss) per common share, adjusted $ 1.63   $ 0.92   $ 1.43   $ 1.59   $ 0.80  
               
    Average total assets $ 31,419,469   $ 31,103,609   $ 32,212,087   $ 31,215,173   $ 29,750,852  
    Return on average assets   0.99 %   0.61 %   0.88 % (0.78 )%   0.56 %
    Return on average assets, adjusted   1.02 %   0.61 %   0.88 %   1.00 %   0.57 %
               
    Average common equity $ 3,195,041   $ 3,114,389   $ 3,120,933   $ 2,945,238   $ 2,857,661  
    Return on average common equity   9.17 %   5.56 %   8.50 % (8.87 )%   5.26 %
    Return on average common equity, adjusted   9.48 %   5.56 %   8.50 %   10.04 %   5.31 %
               
    Efficiency ratio(4)   61.9 %   72.4 %   60.7 %   155.8 %   70.6 %
    Efficiency ratio, adjusted(4)   61.1 %   72.4 %   60.7 %   62.3 %   70.4 %
               
    Average earning assets $ 30,302,351   $ 29,946,425   $ 31,033,803   $ 29,975,318   $ 28,573,791  
    Non-interest income to average earning assets   0.72 %   0.60 %   0.69 % (1.52 )%   0.71 %
    Non-interest income to average earning assets, adjusted   0.74 %   0.60 %   0.69 %   0.86 %   0.71 %
    Non-interest expense to average earning assets   2.52 %   2.75 %   2.21 %   2.59 %   2.65 %
    Non-interest expense to average earning assets, adjusted   2.50 %   2.75 %   2.21 %   2.52 %   2.65 %

    (1) Net interest income plus non-interest income, less non-interest expense, provision for credit losses and income tax expense/(benefit). On an adjusted basis, net interest income plus non-interest income, adjusted, less non-interest expense, adjusted, provision for credit losses and income tax expense/(benefit), adjusted.
    (2) Net income/(loss), less preferred stock dividends. On an adjusted basis, net income/(loss), adjusted, less preferred stock dividends.
    (3) Net interest income plus non-interest income, less non-interest expense. On an adjusted basis, net interest income plus non-interest income, adjusted, less non-interest expense, adjusted.
    (4) Non-interest expense divided by the sum of net interest income and non-interest income. On an adjusted basis, non-interest expense, adjusted, divided by the sum of net interest income and non-interest income, adjusted.

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI China: 7.2-magnitude quake hits 87 km south of Sand Point, Alaska: USGS

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    An earthquake with a magnitude of 7.2 jolted 87 km south of Sand Point, Alaska, the United States, at 20:37:40 GMT on Wednesday, the U.S. Geological Survey said.

    The epicenter, with a depth of 36 km, was initially determined to be at 54.55 degrees north latitude and 160.34 degrees west longitude.

    MIL OSI China News

  • MIL-Evening Report: 12 countries agree to confront Israel collectively over Gaza after Bogotá summit

    ANALYSIS: By Mick Hall

    Collective measures to confront Israel’s genocide of the Palestinian people have been agreed by 12 nations after an emergency summit of the Hague Group in Bogotá, Colombia.

    A joint statement today announced the six measures, which it said were geared to holding Israel to account for its crimes in Palestine and would operate within the states’ domestic legal and legislative frameworks.

    Nearly two dozen other nations in attendance at the summit are now pondering whether to sign up to the measures before a September deadline set by the Hague Group.

    New Zealand and Australia stayed away from the summit.

    The measures include preventing the provision or transfer of arms, munitions, military fuel and dual-use items to Israel and preventing the transit, docking or servicing of vessels if there is a risk of vessels carrying such items. No vessel under the flag of the countries would be allowed to carry this equipment.

    The countries would also “commence an urgent review of all public contracts, in order to prevent public institutions and public funds, where applicable, from supporting Israel’s illegal occupation of the Palestinian Territory which may entrench its unlawful presence in the territory, to ensure that our nationals, and companies and entities under our jurisdiction, as well as our authorities, do not act in any way that would entail recognition or provide aid or assistance in maintaining the situation created by Israel’s illegal presence in the Occupied Palestinian Territory”.

    The countries will prosecute “the most serious crimes under international law through robust, impartial and independent investigations and prosecutions at national or international levels, in compliance with our obligation to ensure justice for all victims and the prevention of future crimes”.

    They agreed to support universal jurisdiction mandates, “as and where applicable in our legal constitutional frameworks and judiciaries, to ensure justice for all victims and the prevention of future crimes in the Occupied Palestine Territory”.

    This will mean IDF soldiers and others accused of war crimes in Palestine would face arrest and could go through domestic judicial processes in these countries, or referrals to the ICC.

    The statement said the measures constituted a collective commitment to defend the foundational principles of international law.

    It also called on the UN Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) to commission an immediate investigation of the health and nutritional needs of the population of Gaza, devise a plan to meet those needs on a continuing and sustained basis, and report on these matters before the 80th session of the United Nations General Assembly in September.

    Following repeated total blockades of Gaza since October 7, 2023, Gazans have been dying of starvation as they continue to be bombed and repeatedly displaced and their means of life destroyed.

    The official death toll stands at nearly 59,000, mostly women and children, although some estimates put that number at over 200,000.

    The joint statement recognised Israel as a threat to regional peace and the system of international law and called on all United Nations member states to enforce their obligations under the UN charter.

    It condemned “unilateral attacks and threats against United Nations mandate holders, as well as key institutions of the human rights architecture and international justice” and committed to build “on the legacy of global solidarity movements that have dismantled apartheid and other oppressive systems, setting a model for future co-ordinated responses to international law violations”.

    Countries face wrath of US
    Ministers, high-ranking officials and envoys from 30 nations attended the two-day event, from July 15-16, called to come up with the measures. It is now hoped some of those attendees will sign up to the statement by September.

    For countries like Ireland, which sent a delegation, signing up would have profound implications. The Irish government has been heavily criticised by its own citizens for continuing to allow Shannon Airport as a transit point for military equipment from the United States to be sent to Israel.

    It would also face the prospect of severe reprisals by the US, as would others thinking of adding their names to the collective statement. The US is now expected to consult with nations that attended and warn them of the consequences of signing up.

    The summit had been billed by the UN Rapporteur for Human Rights in the Occupied Palestinian Territories, Francesca Albanese, as “the most significant political development of the last 20 months”.

    Albanese had told attendees that “for too long, international law has been treated as optional — applied selectively to those perceived as weak, ignored by those acting as the powerful”.

    “This double standard has eroded the very foundations of the legal order. That era must end,” she said.

    Co-chaired by Colombia and South Africa, the Hague group was established by nine nations in late January at The Hague in the Netherlands to hold Israel to account for its crimes and push for Palestinian self-determination.

    Colombia last year ended diplomatic relations with Israel, while South Africa in late December 2023 filed an application at the International Court of Justice (ICJ) accusing Israel of genocide, which was joined by nearly two dozen countries.

    The ICJ has determined a plausible genocide is taking place and issued orders for Israel to protect Palestinians and take measures to stop genocide taking place, a call ignored by the Zionist state.

    Representatives from the countries arrived in Bogota this week in defiance of the United States, which last week sanctioned Albanese for attempts to have US and Israeli political officials and business leaders prosecuted by the ICC over Gaza.

    Secretary of State Marco Rubio called it an illegitimate “campaign of political and economic warfare”.

    It followed the sanctioning of four ICC judges after arrest warrants were issued in November last year for Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former defence minister Yoav Gallant, for crimes against humanity and war crimes.

    Ahead of the Bogota meeting, the US State Department accused The Hague Group of multilateral attempts to “weaponise international law as a tool to advance radical anti-Western agendas” and warned the US would “aggressively defend” its interests.

    Signs of division in the West
    Most of those attending came from nations in the Global South, but not all.

    Founding Hague Group members Belize, Bolivia, Colombia, Cuba, Honduras, Malaysia, Namibia, Senegal and South Africa attended the Summit. Joining them were Algeria, Bangladesh, Botswana, Brazil, Chile, China, Djibouti, Indonesia, Iraq, Republic of Ireland, Lebanon, Libya, Mexico, Nicaragua, Oman, Pakistan, Palestine, Qatar, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Uruguay, and Venezuela.

    However, in a sign of increasing division in the West, NATO members Spain, Portugal, Norway, Slovenia and Turkey also attended.

    Inside the summit, former US State Department official Annelle Sheline, who resigned in March over Gaza, defended the right of those attending “to uphold their obligations under the UN Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide”.

    “This is not the weaponisation of international law. This is the application of international law,” she told delegates.

    The US and Israel deny accusations that genocide is taking place in Gaza, while Western media have collectively refused to adjudicate the claims or frame stories around Israel’s ethnic cleansing of the strip, despite ample evidence by the UN and genocide experts.

    Since 7 October 2023, US allies have offered diplomatic cover for Israel by repeating it had “a right to defend itself” and was engaged in a legitimate defensive “war against Hamas”.

    Israel now plans to corral starving Gazans into a concentration camp in the south of the strip, with many analysts expecting the IDF to exterminate anyone found outside its boundaries, while preparing to push those inside across the border into Egypt.

    Asia Pacific and EU allies shun Bogota summit
    Addressing attendees at the summit yesterday, Albanese criticised the EU for its neo-colonialism and support for Israel, criticisms that can be extended to US allies in the Asia Pacific region.

    Independent journalist Abby Martin reported Albanese as saying: “Europe and its institutions are guided more by colonial mindset than principle, acting as vessels to US Empire even as it drags us from war to war, misery to misery.

    “The Hague Group is a new moral centre in world politics. Millions are hoping for leadership that can birth a new global order, rooted in justice, humanity and collective liberation. It’s not just about Palestine. This is about all of us.”

    The Australian Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade was asked why Foreign Minister Penny Wong did not take up an invite to attend the Hague Group meeting. In a statement to Mick Hall in Context, a spokesperson said she had been unable to attend, but did not explain why.

    She said Australia was a “resolute defender of international law” and added: “Australia has consistently been part of international calls that all parties must abide by international humanitarian law. Not enough has been done to protect civilians and aid workers.

    “We have called on Israel to respond substantively to the ICJ’s advisory opinion on the legal consequences arising from Israel’s policies and practices in the Occupied Palestinian Territories.

    “We have also called on Israel to comply with the binding orders of the ICJ, including to enable the unhindered provision of basic services and humanitarian assistance at scale.”

    When asked why New Zealand’s Foreign Minister Winston Peters had failed to take up the invitation or send any of his officials, a Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade (MFAT) spokesperson simply refused to comment.

    She said MFAT media advisors would only engage with “recognised news media outlets”.

    Australia’s Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and New Zealand’s Prime Minister Christopher Luxon, as well as a number of his ministers, have been referred to the ICC by domestic legal teams, accused of complicity in the genocide.

    Evidence against Albanese was accepted into the ICC’s wider investigation of crimes in Gaza in October last year, while Luxon’s referral earlier this month is being assessed by the Chief Prosecutor’s Office.

    Delegates told humanity at stake
    Delegates heard several impassioned addresses from speakers on what was at stake during the two-day event in Bogota.

    Palestinian-American trauma surgeon, Dr Thaer Ahmad, told the gathering that Palestinians seeking food were being met with bullets, describing aid distribution facilities set up by the US contractor-run Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) as “slaughterhouses”. More than 800 starving Gazans have been killed at the GHF aid points so far.

    “People know they could die but cannot sit idly by and watch their families starve,” he said.

    “The bullets fired by GHF mercenaries are just one part of the weaponisation of aid, where Palestinians are ghettoised into areas where somebody in military fatigues decides if you are worthy of food or not.”

    Palestinian diplomat Riyad Mansour had urged the summit attendees to take decisive action to not only save the Palestinian people, but redeem humanity.

    “Instead of outrage at the crimes we know are taking place, we find those who defend, normalise, and even celebrate them,” he said.

    “The core values we believed humanity agreed were universal are shattered, blown to pieces like the tens of thousands of starved, murdered and injured civilians in Palestine.

    “The mind and heart cannot fathom or process the immense pain and horror that has taken hold of the lives of an entire people. We must not fail — not just for Palestine’s sake — but for humanity’s sake.”

    At the beginning of the summit, Colombian Deputy Foreign Minister Mauricio Jaramillo Jassir told summit delegates the Palestinian genocide threatened the entire international system.

    Colombian President Gustavo Petro wrote in The Guardian last week: “We can either stand firm in defence of the legal principles that seek to prevent war and conflict, or watch helplessly as the international system collapses under the weight of unchecked power politics.”

    Meanwhile, EU foreign ministers, as well as Israel’s Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar and Syrian counterpart, Asaad Hassan al-Shaibani, met in Brussels at the same time as the Bogota summit, to discuss Middle East co-operation, but also possible options for action against Israel.

    At the EU–Southern Neighbourhood Ministerial Meeting, EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas put forward potential actions after Israel was found to have breached the EU economic cooperation deal with the bloc on human rights grounds. As expected, no sanctions, restricted trade or suspension of the co-operation deal were agreed.

    The EU has been one of Israel’s most strident backers in its campaign against Gaza, with EU members Germany and France in particular supplying weapons, as well as political support.

    The UK government has continued to supply arms and operate spy planes over Gaza over the past 21 months, launched from bases in Cyprus, while its military has issued D-Notices to censor media reports that its special forces have been operating inside the occupied territories.

    Mick Hall is an independent Irish-New Zealand journalist, formerly of RNZ and AAP, based in New Zealand since 2009. He writes primarily on politics, corporate power and international affairs. This article is republished from his substack Mick Hall in Context with permission.

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-Evening Report: 12 countries agree to confront Israel collectively over Gaza after Bogotá summit

    ANALYSIS: By Mick Hall

    Collective measures to confront Israel’s genocide of the Palestinian people have been agreed by 12 nations after an emergency summit of the Hague Group in Bogotá, Colombia.

    A joint statement today announced the six measures, which it said were geared to holding Israel to account for its crimes in Palestine and would operate within the states’ domestic legal and legislative frameworks.

    Nearly two dozen other nations in attendance at the summit are now pondering whether to sign up to the measures before a September deadline set by the Hague Group.

    New Zealand and Australia stayed away from the summit.

    The measures include preventing the provision or transfer of arms, munitions, military fuel and dual-use items to Israel and preventing the transit, docking or servicing of vessels if there is a risk of vessels carrying such items. No vessel under the flag of the countries would be allowed to carry this equipment.

    The countries would also “commence an urgent review of all public contracts, in order to prevent public institutions and public funds, where applicable, from supporting Israel’s illegal occupation of the Palestinian Territory which may entrench its unlawful presence in the territory, to ensure that our nationals, and companies and entities under our jurisdiction, as well as our authorities, do not act in any way that would entail recognition or provide aid or assistance in maintaining the situation created by Israel’s illegal presence in the Occupied Palestinian Territory”.

    The countries will prosecute “the most serious crimes under international law through robust, impartial and independent investigations and prosecutions at national or international levels, in compliance with our obligation to ensure justice for all victims and the prevention of future crimes”.

    They agreed to support universal jurisdiction mandates, “as and where applicable in our legal constitutional frameworks and judiciaries, to ensure justice for all victims and the prevention of future crimes in the Occupied Palestine Territory”.

    This will mean IDF soldiers and others accused of war crimes in Palestine would face arrest and could go through domestic judicial processes in these countries, or referrals to the ICC.

    The statement said the measures constituted a collective commitment to defend the foundational principles of international law.

    It also called on the UN Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) to commission an immediate investigation of the health and nutritional needs of the population of Gaza, devise a plan to meet those needs on a continuing and sustained basis, and report on these matters before the 80th session of the United Nations General Assembly in September.

    Following repeated total blockades of Gaza since October 7, 2023, Gazans have been dying of starvation as they continue to be bombed and repeatedly displaced and their means of life destroyed.

    The official death toll stands at nearly 59,000, mostly women and children, although some estimates put that number at over 200,000.

    The joint statement recognised Israel as a threat to regional peace and the system of international law and called on all United Nations member states to enforce their obligations under the UN charter.

    It condemned “unilateral attacks and threats against United Nations mandate holders, as well as key institutions of the human rights architecture and international justice” and committed to build “on the legacy of global solidarity movements that have dismantled apartheid and other oppressive systems, setting a model for future co-ordinated responses to international law violations”.

    Countries face wrath of US
    Ministers, high-ranking officials and envoys from 30 nations attended the two-day event, from July 15-16, called to come up with the measures. It is now hoped some of those attendees will sign up to the statement by September.

    For countries like Ireland, which sent a delegation, signing up would have profound implications. The Irish government has been heavily criticised by its own citizens for continuing to allow Shannon Airport as a transit point for military equipment from the United States to be sent to Israel.

    It would also face the prospect of severe reprisals by the US, as would others thinking of adding their names to the collective statement. The US is now expected to consult with nations that attended and warn them of the consequences of signing up.

    The summit had been billed by the UN Rapporteur for Human Rights in the Occupied Palestinian Territories, Francesca Albanese, as “the most significant political development of the last 20 months”.

    Albanese had told attendees that “for too long, international law has been treated as optional — applied selectively to those perceived as weak, ignored by those acting as the powerful”.

    “This double standard has eroded the very foundations of the legal order. That era must end,” she said.

    Co-chaired by Colombia and South Africa, the Hague group was established by nine nations in late January at The Hague in the Netherlands to hold Israel to account for its crimes and push for Palestinian self-determination.

    Colombia last year ended diplomatic relations with Israel, while South Africa in late December 2023 filed an application at the International Court of Justice (ICJ) accusing Israel of genocide, which was joined by nearly two dozen countries.

    The ICJ has determined a plausible genocide is taking place and issued orders for Israel to protect Palestinians and take measures to stop genocide taking place, a call ignored by the Zionist state.

    Representatives from the countries arrived in Bogota this week in defiance of the United States, which last week sanctioned Albanese for attempts to have US and Israeli political officials and business leaders prosecuted by the ICC over Gaza.

    Secretary of State Marco Rubio called it an illegitimate “campaign of political and economic warfare”.

    It followed the sanctioning of four ICC judges after arrest warrants were issued in November last year for Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former defence minister Yoav Gallant, for crimes against humanity and war crimes.

    Ahead of the Bogota meeting, the US State Department accused The Hague Group of multilateral attempts to “weaponise international law as a tool to advance radical anti-Western agendas” and warned the US would “aggressively defend” its interests.

    Signs of division in the West
    Most of those attending came from nations in the Global South, but not all.

    Founding Hague Group members Belize, Bolivia, Colombia, Cuba, Honduras, Malaysia, Namibia, Senegal and South Africa attended the Summit. Joining them were Algeria, Bangladesh, Botswana, Brazil, Chile, China, Djibouti, Indonesia, Iraq, Republic of Ireland, Lebanon, Libya, Mexico, Nicaragua, Oman, Pakistan, Palestine, Qatar, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Uruguay, and Venezuela.

    However, in a sign of increasing division in the West, NATO members Spain, Portugal, Norway, Slovenia and Turkey also attended.

    Inside the summit, former US State Department official Annelle Sheline, who resigned in March over Gaza, defended the right of those attending “to uphold their obligations under the UN Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide”.

    “This is not the weaponisation of international law. This is the application of international law,” she told delegates.

    The US and Israel deny accusations that genocide is taking place in Gaza, while Western media have collectively refused to adjudicate the claims or frame stories around Israel’s ethnic cleansing of the strip, despite ample evidence by the UN and genocide experts.

    Since 7 October 2023, US allies have offered diplomatic cover for Israel by repeating it had “a right to defend itself” and was engaged in a legitimate defensive “war against Hamas”.

    Israel now plans to corral starving Gazans into a concentration camp in the south of the strip, with many analysts expecting the IDF to exterminate anyone found outside its boundaries, while preparing to push those inside across the border into Egypt.

    Asia Pacific and EU allies shun Bogota summit
    Addressing attendees at the summit yesterday, Albanese criticised the EU for its neo-colonialism and support for Israel, criticisms that can be extended to US allies in the Asia Pacific region.

    Independent journalist Abby Martin reported Albanese as saying: “Europe and its institutions are guided more by colonial mindset than principle, acting as vessels to US Empire even as it drags us from war to war, misery to misery.

    “The Hague Group is a new moral centre in world politics. Millions are hoping for leadership that can birth a new global order, rooted in justice, humanity and collective liberation. It’s not just about Palestine. This is about all of us.”

    The Australian Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade was asked why Foreign Minister Penny Wong did not take up an invite to attend the Hague Group meeting. In a statement to Mick Hall in Context, a spokesperson said she had been unable to attend, but did not explain why.

    She said Australia was a “resolute defender of international law” and added: “Australia has consistently been part of international calls that all parties must abide by international humanitarian law. Not enough has been done to protect civilians and aid workers.

    “We have called on Israel to respond substantively to the ICJ’s advisory opinion on the legal consequences arising from Israel’s policies and practices in the Occupied Palestinian Territories.

    “We have also called on Israel to comply with the binding orders of the ICJ, including to enable the unhindered provision of basic services and humanitarian assistance at scale.”

    When asked why New Zealand’s Foreign Minister Winston Peters had failed to take up the invitation or send any of his officials, a Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade (MFAT) spokesperson simply refused to comment.

    She said MFAT media advisors would only engage with “recognised news media outlets”.

    Australia’s Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and New Zealand’s Prime Minister Christopher Luxon, as well as a number of his ministers, have been referred to the ICC by domestic legal teams, accused of complicity in the genocide.

    Evidence against Albanese was accepted into the ICC’s wider investigation of crimes in Gaza in October last year, while Luxon’s referral earlier this month is being assessed by the Chief Prosecutor’s Office.

    Delegates told humanity at stake
    Delegates heard several impassioned addresses from speakers on what was at stake during the two-day event in Bogota.

    Palestinian-American trauma surgeon, Dr Thaer Ahmad, told the gathering that Palestinians seeking food were being met with bullets, describing aid distribution facilities set up by the US contractor-run Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) as “slaughterhouses”. More than 800 starving Gazans have been killed at the GHF aid points so far.

    “People know they could die but cannot sit idly by and watch their families starve,” he said.

    “The bullets fired by GHF mercenaries are just one part of the weaponisation of aid, where Palestinians are ghettoised into areas where somebody in military fatigues decides if you are worthy of food or not.”

    Palestinian diplomat Riyad Mansour had urged the summit attendees to take decisive action to not only save the Palestinian people, but redeem humanity.

    “Instead of outrage at the crimes we know are taking place, we find those who defend, normalise, and even celebrate them,” he said.

    “The core values we believed humanity agreed were universal are shattered, blown to pieces like the tens of thousands of starved, murdered and injured civilians in Palestine.

    “The mind and heart cannot fathom or process the immense pain and horror that has taken hold of the lives of an entire people. We must not fail — not just for Palestine’s sake — but for humanity’s sake.”

    At the beginning of the summit, Colombian Deputy Foreign Minister Mauricio Jaramillo Jassir told summit delegates the Palestinian genocide threatened the entire international system.

    Colombian President Gustavo Petro wrote in The Guardian last week: “We can either stand firm in defence of the legal principles that seek to prevent war and conflict, or watch helplessly as the international system collapses under the weight of unchecked power politics.”

    Meanwhile, EU foreign ministers, as well as Israel’s Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar and Syrian counterpart, Asaad Hassan al-Shaibani, met in Brussels at the same time as the Bogota summit, to discuss Middle East co-operation, but also possible options for action against Israel.

    At the EU–Southern Neighbourhood Ministerial Meeting, EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas put forward potential actions after Israel was found to have breached the EU economic cooperation deal with the bloc on human rights grounds. As expected, no sanctions, restricted trade or suspension of the co-operation deal were agreed.

    The EU has been one of Israel’s most strident backers in its campaign against Gaza, with EU members Germany and France in particular supplying weapons, as well as political support.

    The UK government has continued to supply arms and operate spy planes over Gaza over the past 21 months, launched from bases in Cyprus, while its military has issued D-Notices to censor media reports that its special forces have been operating inside the occupied territories.

    Mick Hall is an independent Irish-New Zealand journalist, formerly of RNZ and AAP, based in New Zealand since 2009. He writes primarily on politics, corporate power and international affairs. This article is republished from his substack Mick Hall in Context with permission.

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-OSI USA: Hoeven Statement on Senate Passage of President Trump’s Rescissions Request Legislation Makes $9 Billion in Spending Cuts

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for North Dakota John Hoeven
    07.17.25
    WASHINGTON – Senator John Hoeven issued the following statement after the Senate approved President Trump’s request to rescind $9 billion in wasteful spending. The White House submitted the rescissions package, which represents less than one-tenth of 1 percent of the federal budget, to Congress for consideration.
    “The American people have made it clear that we need to get control of our debt and deficit,” said Hoeven. “This package represents a fraction of our federal budget but is an important step in reining in federal spending. The vast majority of the rescissions come from foreign aid, and will help get rid of projects we shouldn’t be funding.”

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Security: Blue Springs Man Charged with Illegal Possession of Ammunition

    Source: United States Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco Firearms and Explosives (ATF)

    KANSAS CITY, Mo. – A Blue Springs, Mo., man was indicted by a federal grand jury on July 15, 2025, for illegally possessing ammunition.

    William Anthony Chaney, 38, was charged with being a felon in possession of ammunition after previously being convicted in federal court in the Western District of Missouri for conspiracy to distribute PCP and conspiracy to commit money laundering in 2016.  The indictment specifically alleges that, on or about May 24, 2025, Chaney illegally possessed ammunition that had previously travelled in interstate commerce, knowing that he was a prior felon.  Chaney was on federal supervised release for his prior conviction at the time he was discovered in possession of the ammunition.

    The charges contained in this indictment are simply accusations, and not evidence of guilt. Evidence supporting the charges must be presented to a federal trial jury, whose duty is to determine guilt or innocence.

    This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Kenneth W. Borgnino. It was investigated by the Blue Springs Missouri Police Department, and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms (ATF).

    Operation Take Back America

    These cases are part of Operation Take Back America, a nationwide initiative that marshals the full resources of the Department of Justice to repel the invasion of illegal immigration, achieve the total elimination of cartels and transnational criminal organizations (TCOs), and protect our communities from the perpetrators of violent crime. Operation Take Back America streamlines efforts and resources from the Department’s Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Forces (OCDETFs) and Project Safe Neighborhood (PSN).

    MIL Security OSI

  • Cricket to return at LA28 Olympics after 128 years, T20 format confirmed

    Source: Government of India

    Source: Government of India (4)

    Cricket will return to the Olympic stage after more than a century, with the sport set to feature in the Los Angeles 2028 Games in the fast-paced Twenty20 (T20) format.

    The men’s and women’s competitions will each feature six teams, with matches scheduled to begin on July 12 at Fairgrounds Stadium in Pomona, a temporary venue located roughly 50km east of downtown Los Angeles. The women’s medal match is slated for July 20, while the men’s final will be held on July 29.

    A total of 180 players will participate across the two events, with each team allowed to name a 15-member squad. Most match days will feature double-headers, starting at 9:00 a.m. and 6:30 p.m. local time. No games are scheduled on July 14 and 21.

    Cricket last featured in the Olympics at the 1900 Paris Games, when Great Britain defeated France in the only match played. Its return comes alongside four other sports — baseball/softball, flag football, lacrosse, and squash — approved by the International Olympic Committee for LA28.

    “This is a Games for all, and cricket’s inclusion reflects that spirit,” Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass said in a statement. She also cited the success of the city’s PlayLA youth sports initiative, which recently surpassed one million enrollments.

    The Fairgrounds Stadium, located at the Fairplex complex in Pomona, spans nearly 500 acres and regularly hosts large-scale events including the LA County Fair. It will serve as the sole venue for the cricket tournament.

    Cricket’s addition follows growing interest in the sport in the United States, particularly after the country co-hosted the ICC Men’s T20 World Cup 2024 with the West Indies. Matches were held in Grand Prairie, Lauderhill, and New York.

    Women’s cricket has seen increased visibility in recent years, debuting at the Commonwealth Games in 2022 and featuring in three Asian Games editions (2010, 2014, 2023) alongside the men’s tournament.

    The International Cricket Council (ICC), in coordination with national boards, is now working on creating a fair and transparent qualification pathway to ensure that top-performing teams get a chance to compete at LA28.

    (With agency input)

  • MIL-OSI Africa: Government scales up youth-focused initiatives 

    Source: Government of South Africa

    As government pursues faster and more inclusive economic growth, the fight against youth unemployment remains a priority, with large-scale programmes underway to create opportunities for young people to earn an income, develop skills and gain work experience.

    Delivering the Presidency Budget Vote for the 2025/2026 financial year, President Cyril Ramaphosa said the greatest challenge that faces South Africa today is youth unemployment. 

    “Approximately 3.8 million out of 10.3 million young people aged 15 to 24 years are not in employment, education or training. These are young people with energy, initiative and untapped potential,” President Ramaphosa said.

    In his address on Wednesday, the President said government has launched large-scale programmes to provide young people with income opportunities, skills development and work experience.

    “Through innovative and targeted interventions, the Presidential Employment Stimulus has continued to demonstrate that when a society invests in its people, the dividends are measured in hope restored and futures rewritten,” he said. 

    He cited the Basic Education Employment Initiative, which entered a new phase in June this year, placing over 200 000 young people as school assistants in more than 2 0000 schools. 

    To date, this initiative has created over one million posts for young people to serve as assistants in schools, supporting teachers in classrooms, school administration and school maintenance.

    “The programme has been designed to strengthen the learning environment and learning outcomes in schools. In the process, participants gain work experience and skills vital to finding employment and starting their own businesses,” the President said.

    He added that the SAYouth.mobi platform was launched in 2020 to tackle the barriers faced by young people such as experience and the lack of transport or lack of data money.

    “There are now over 4.7 million young people registered on the SAYouth network. Young people have been supported to access over 1.67 million earning opportunities.

    “A significant achievement of SA Youth is that the vast majority of earning opportunities have been accessed by the most excluded young people. Seventy percent of opportunities have been accessed by young black African women,” President Ramaphosa said.

    The President noted that around 65% of the platform’s users live in grant-receiving households, demonstrating that “we are reaching some of the people who have the greatest need.”

    Another impactful initiative mentioned was the Youth Employment Service (YES), which he said has become the largest corporate-funded youth jobs programme globally. 

    The programme has to date provided over 190 000 young people with year-long work experience opportunities.

    “Through all of these programmes coordinated by the Presidency, we are changing the way that government works and scaling innovative solutions to our unemployment challenge,” the President said. 

    Education 

    Turning to education, President Ramaphosa underscored its role in fighting poverty, with a focus on early childhood development, foundational learning, and access to well-run schools.

    “We continue our efforts to ensure that learners have a safe and conducive environment in which to learn. To date, we have completed 97 percent of the sanitation projects under the SAFE initiative aimed at getting rid of pit latrines in our schools.”

    He also confirmed the implementation of the Basic Education Laws Amendment (BELA) Act, expansion of vocational training, and broader access to higher education through the National Student Financial Aid Scheme (NSFAS).

    Having come into effect in December last year, the Act amends sections of the South African Schools Act of 1996 (SASA) and the Employment of Educators Act, 1998 (EEA) to account for developments in the education landscape since the enactment of the original legislation.

    Through the NSFAS, government is expanding access for students from poor and working class families, and with the support of the National Skills Fund, assistance is being expanded to the ‘missing middle’.

    “This year, NSFAS is supporting over 800 000 university and TVET [technical and vocational education and training] college students. This provides opportunities to young people today that will, in time, transform our economy and society,” he said. 

    NHI

    On healthcare and the National Health Insurance (NHI), the President said government is addressing the poor state of health facilities and is hiring more professionals, while also permanently employing community health workers.

    “To address the severe challenges in the health system and in preparation for the implementation of the NHI, we are directing resources towards the hiring of more doctors, nurses and health professionals, the permanent employment of community health workers, and the purchase of new equipment and supplies.

    “We are determined to meet our HIV testing and treatment targets, despite the withdrawal of US funding,” he added, noting that Deputy President Paul Mashatile continues to lead the HIV/AIDS response through the South African National AIDS Council.

    Last week, Health Minister, Dr Aaron Motsoaledi, said the National Treasury has allocated R753 million to the Department of Health — under Section 16 of the Public Finance Management Act (PFMA) — to help bridge the shortfall caused by the United States’ decision to cut HIV and tuberculosis (TB) grants.

    READ | Treasury allocates emergency funding of R750m towards HIV and TB after US funding cuts

    The United States government’s withdrawal of funding to key health initiatives, including the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief P(EPFAR), which was established by former President George W Bush in 2003, led to a loss of R7.9 billion spent on HIV/Aids programmes annually.
     

    Governance 

    On governance, the President said building a capable and corruption-resistant state remains a priority. 

    “For us to effectively tackle any of these challenges, we need to build a capable state with institutions that are resistant to corruption or interference. 

    “The recent adoption of the Public Service Commission Bill by the National Assembly marks a crucial milestone, enhancing the independence and effectiveness of the Public Service Commission in promoting ethical governance,” the President said. 

    President Ramaphosa said the bill will allow the Commission to function as an impartial constitutional body and ensure that the executive is compelled to act on the Commission’s recommendations, thereby reinforcing accountability across the public sector. 

    Digital Transformation Roadmap

    He added that the Digital Transformation Roadmap launched in April 2025, is set to make government work more efficiently while also bringing it closer to the people.

    READ | Digital Transformation Roadmap to make it easier to access government services

    “The roadmap focuses on building digital public infrastructure including a digital identity for every South African citizen. 

    “It includes a digital payments system to enable instant, low-cost payments, and interoperable data systems to ensure that citizens only have to provide their information to government once,” said President Ramaphosa. – SAnews.gov.za

    MIL OSI Africa

  • MIL-OSI Africa: Government to roll out Mpox vaccines as new cases are detected

    Source: Government of South Africa

    The Department of Health has announced a vaccination drive against Mpox disease, as the number of laboratory-confirmed cases is gradually increasing in the country.

    According to the department, the vaccination programme will primarily target the provinces most affected, which currently include Gauteng, Western Cape, and KwaZulu-Natal.

    Two new laboratory-confirmed cases were recorded – one in Gauteng and one in the Western Cape. 

    These cases involve a 32-year-old from Cape Town and a 45-year-old from Johannesburg, and both individuals have no history of travel.

    This brings to 10 the total number of confirmed cases since the beginning of 2025.

    “Vaccination helps to control the spread of this preventable and manageable disease, with vaccinated individuals being protected from becoming infected and from developing severe complications,” the statement read. 

    The department said vaccination can be accessed at some public health facilities, travel clinics and a few private providers in the selected provinces.

    Meanwhile, the department has urged people to be vigilant about the symptoms of Mpox. 

    Those who suspect they may be at risk of Mpox infection are advised to consult their nearest health facility or healthcare provider for screening and testing. They should also enquire about their eligibility for this life-saving vaccination.

    “Priority will be given to people at a higher risk of contracting the virus, including those who came into close contact with people who tested positive, people with multiple sexual partners and travellers going to areas where there is an outbreak of Mpox. Where indicated, vaccination will be offered to pregnant women and children older than two years.” 

    Mpox vaccine

    The department received approximately 10 500 doses of the mpox vaccine, Imvanex, as a donation from the Africa Centres for Disease Control. 

    This donation was made through the Access and Allocation Mechanism for Mpox to help combat the various outbreaks of Mpox across the African continent.

    The South African Health Products Regulatory Authority (SAHPRA) authorised the importation of this vaccine through a Section 21 process, which covers the sale and use of medicines not yet registered in South Africa. 

    The National Control Laboratory tested Imvanex samples to establish the vaccine’s safety and efficacy before its release to the South African market.

    “The vaccine was found to be safe and is well tolerated in most people. As with any vaccine, some individuals may experience mild to moderate side effects after vaccination. This is a normal sign that the body is developing some level of immunity to prevent the severity of the disease if infected,” the department said.

    Several countries, including the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Nigeria, Uganda, the United States, Canada and European countries have utilised the Mpox vaccine to control the spread of the disease. 

    Common side effects that might be experienced following immunisation include pain, redness, swelling and itching at the injection site, muscle pain, headache, nausea and fever. 

    However, the department said most side effects disappear on their own within a few days without treatment.

    These side effects can be managed by having enough rest, staying hydrated and taking medication to manage pain, if needed. 

    Individuals are encouraged to report any suspected side effects following immunisation directly to a healthcare professional or via the Med Safety App, which can be downloaded for free on an Android or IOS smartphone at https://medsafety.sahpra.org.za.

    The number of Mpox vaccine doses allocated to South Africa is limited, and quantities will be issued in a phased approach, prioritising outbreak hotspots and based on vaccine availability. 

    More information regarding mpox vaccination sites can be accessed at https://health.gov.za/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/2025-MPOX-VACCINATION-SITES.pdf. – SAnews.gov.za

    MIL OSI Africa

  • MIL-OSI Security: USS Pearl Harbor (LSD 52) U.S. Navy Sailors perform bridge operations [Image 1 of 7]

    Source: United States Navy (Logistics Group Western Pacific)

    Issued by: on


    PACIFIC OCEAN (July 15, 2025) Seaman Asia Blackwell, from Covington, Virginia steers the helm in the bridge aboard the Harpers Ferry-class amphibious dock landing ship USS Pearl Harbor (LSD 52) in the Indo-Pacific region on July 15, 2025. Now in its 21st iteration, the Pacific Partnership series is the largest annual multinational humanitarian assistance and disaster management preparedness mission conducted in the Indo-Pacific. Pacific Partnership works collaboratively with host and partner nations to enhance regional interoperability and disaster response capabilities, increase security and stability in the region, and foster new and enduring friendships in the Indo-Pacific. (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist Seaman Isabel Mendoza)

    Date Taken: 07.15.2025
    Date Posted: 07.17.2025 03:22
    Photo ID: 9184653
    VIRIN: 250716-N-DM179-1016
    Resolution: 2517×1798
    Size: 421.54 KB
    Location: US

    Web Views: 2
    Downloads: 0

    PUBLIC DOMAIN  

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Security: USS Pearl Harbor (LSD 52) U.S. Navy Sailors perform bridge operations [Image 3 of 7]

    Source: United States Navy (Logistics Group Western Pacific)

    Issued by: on


    PACIFIC OCEAN (July 15, 2025) Quartermaster Seaman Shaniya Mckinney, from Johnston, South Carolina works on shipboard qualifications in the bridge aboard the Harpers Ferry-class amphibious dock landing ship USS Pearl Harbor (LSD 52) in the Indo-Pacific region on July 15, 2025. Now in its 21st iteration, the Pacific Partnership series is the largest annual multinational humanitarian assistance and disaster management preparedness mission conducted in the Indo-Pacific. Pacific Partnership works collaboratively with host and partner nations to enhance regional interoperability and disaster response capabilities, increase security and stability in the region, and foster new and enduring friendships in the Indo-Pacific. (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist Seaman Isabel Mendoza)

    Date Taken: 07.15.2025
    Date Posted: 07.17.2025 03:22
    Photo ID: 9184658
    VIRIN: 250716-N-DM179-1005
    Resolution: 2434×1739
    Size: 409.42 KB
    Location: US

    Web Views: 2
    Downloads: 0

    PUBLIC DOMAIN  

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI USA: U.S. Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem to Host Press Conference at Nashville International Airport

    Source: US Department of Homeland Security

    Headline: U.S. Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem to Host Press Conference at Nashville International Airport

    U.S. Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem to Host Press Conference at Nashville International Airport
    aunica.brockel

    Secretary Noem will be hosting a press conference at the Nashville International Airport to highlight the opening of an Honor Lane – a special TSA security lane designated exclusively for military members and their families. She will also be addressing multiple other benefits for military members and their families as part of the “Serve With Honor, Travel With Ease” initiative. 

    Watch on YouTube

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-Evening Report: Rainbow Warrior bombing by French secret agents remembered 40 years on

    SPECIAL REPORT: By Te Aniwaniwa Paterson of Te Ao Māori News

    Forty years ago today, French secret agents bombed the Greenpeace campaign flagship  Rainbow Warrior in an attempt to stop the environmental organisation’s protest against nuclear testing at Moruroa Atoll in Mā’ohi Nui.

    People gathered on board Rainbow Warrior III to remember photographer Fernando Pereira, who was killed in the attack, and to honour the legacy of those who stood up to nuclear testing in the Pacific.

    The Rainbow Warrior’s final voyage before the bombing was Operation Exodus, a humanitarian mission to the Marshall Islands. There, Greenpeace helped relocate more than 320 residents of Rongelap Atoll, who had been exposed to radiation from US nuclear testing.

    The dawn ceremony was hosted by Ngāti Whātua Ōrākei and attended by more than 150 people. Speeches were followed by the laying of a wreath and a moment of silence.

    Photographer Fernando Pereira and a woman from Rongelap on the day the Rainbow Warrior arrived in Rongelap Atoll in May 1985. Image: David Robie/Eyes of Fire

    Tui Warmenhoven (Ngāti Porou), the chair of the Greenpeace Aotearoa board, said it was a day to remember for the harm caused by the French state against the people of Mā’ohi Nui.

    Warmenhoven worked for 20 years in iwi research and is a grassroots, Ruatoria-based community leader who works to integrate mātauranga Māori with science to address climate change in Te Tai Rāwhiti.

    She encouraged Māori to stand united with Greenpeace.

    “Ko te mea nui ki a mātou, a Greenpeace Aotearoa, ko te whawhai i ngā mahi tūkino a rātou, te kāwanatanga, ngā rangatōpū, me ngā tāngata whai rawa, e patu ana i a mātou, te iwi Māori, ngā iwi o te ao, me ō mātou mātua, a Ranginui rāua ko Papatūānuku,” e ai ki a Warmenhoven.

    Tui Warmenhoven and Dr Russel Norman in front of Rainbow Warrior III on 10 July 2025. Image:Te Ao Māori News

    A defining moment in Aotearoa’s nuclear-free stand
    “The bombing of the Rainbow Warrior was a defining moment for Greenpeace in its willingness to fight for a nuclear-free world,” said Dr Russel Norman, the executive director of Greenpeace Aotearoa.

    He noted it was also a defining moment for Aotearoa in the country’s stand against the United States and France, who conducted nuclear tests in the region.

    Greenpeace Aotearoa executive director Dr Russel Norman speaking at the ceremony on board Rainbow Warrior III today. Image: Te Ao Māpri News

    In 1987, the New Zealand Nuclear Free Zone, Disarmament, and Arms Control Act officially declared the country a nuclear-free zone.

    This move angered the United States, especially due to the ban on nuclear-powered or nuclear-armed ships entering New Zealand ports.

    Because the US followed a policy of neither confirming nor denying the presence of nuclear weapons, it saw the ban as breaching the ANZUS Treaty and suspended its security commitments to New Zealand.

    The Rainbow Warrior’s final voyage before it was bombed was Operation Exodus, during which the crew helped relocate more than 320 residents of Rongelap Atoll in the Marshall Islands, who had been exposed to radiation from US nuclear testing between 1946 and 1958.

    The evacuation of Rongelap Islanders to Mejatto by the Rainbow Warrior crew in May 1985. Image: Greenpeace/Fernando Pereira

    The legacy of Operation Exodus
    Between 1946 and 1958, the United States carried out 67 nuclear tests in the Marshall Islands.

    For decades, it denied the long-term health impacts, even as cancer rates rose and children were born with severe deformities.

    Despite repeated pleas from the people of Rongelap to be evacuated, the US government failed to act until Greenpeace stepped in to help.

    “The United States government effectively used them as guinea pigs for nuclear testing and radiation to see what would happen to people, which is obviously outrageous and disgusting,” Dr Norman said.

    He said it was important not to see Pacific peoples as victims, as they were powerful campaigners who played a leading role in ending nuclear testing in the region.

    Marshallese women greet the Rainbow Warrior as it arrived in the capital Majuro in March 2025. Image: Bianca Vitale/Greenpeace

    Between March and April this year, Rainbow Warrior III returned to the Marshall Islands to conduct independent research into the radiation levels across the islands to see whether it’s safe for the people of Rongelap to return.

    What advice do you give to this generation about nuclear issues?
    “Kia kotahi ai koutou ki te whai i ngā mahi uaua i mua i a mātou ki te whawhai i a rātou mā, e mahi tūkino ana ki tō mātou ao, ki tō mātou kōkā a Papatūānuku, ki tō mātou taiao,” hei tā Tui Warmenhoven.

    A reminder to stay united in the difficult world ahead in the fight against threats to the environment.

    Warmenhoven also encouraged Māori to support Greenpeace Aotearoa.

    Tui Warmenhoven and the captain of the Rainbow Warrior, Ali Schmidt, placed a wreath in the water at the stern of the ship in memory of Fernando Pereira. Image: Greenpeace

    Dr Norman believed the younger generations should be inspired to activism by the bravery of those from the Pacific and Greenpeace who campaigned for a nuclear-free world 40 years ago.

    “They were willing to take very significant risks, they sailed their boats into the nuclear test zone to stop those nuclear tests, they were arrested by the French, beaten up by French commandos,” he said.

    Republished from Te Ao Māori News with permission.

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-Evening Report: Rainbow Warrior bombing by French secret agents remembered 40 years on

    SPECIAL REPORT: By Te Aniwaniwa Paterson of Te Ao Māori News

    Forty years ago today, French secret agents bombed the Greenpeace campaign flagship  Rainbow Warrior in an attempt to stop the environmental organisation’s protest against nuclear testing at Moruroa Atoll in Mā’ohi Nui.

    People gathered on board Rainbow Warrior III to remember photographer Fernando Pereira, who was killed in the attack, and to honour the legacy of those who stood up to nuclear testing in the Pacific.

    The Rainbow Warrior’s final voyage before the bombing was Operation Exodus, a humanitarian mission to the Marshall Islands. There, Greenpeace helped relocate more than 320 residents of Rongelap Atoll, who had been exposed to radiation from US nuclear testing.

    The dawn ceremony was hosted by Ngāti Whātua Ōrākei and attended by more than 150 people. Speeches were followed by the laying of a wreath and a moment of silence.

    Photographer Fernando Pereira and a woman from Rongelap on the day the Rainbow Warrior arrived in Rongelap Atoll in May 1985. Image: David Robie/Eyes of Fire

    Tui Warmenhoven (Ngāti Porou), the chair of the Greenpeace Aotearoa board, said it was a day to remember for the harm caused by the French state against the people of Mā’ohi Nui.

    Warmenhoven worked for 20 years in iwi research and is a grassroots, Ruatoria-based community leader who works to integrate mātauranga Māori with science to address climate change in Te Tai Rāwhiti.

    She encouraged Māori to stand united with Greenpeace.

    “Ko te mea nui ki a mātou, a Greenpeace Aotearoa, ko te whawhai i ngā mahi tūkino a rātou, te kāwanatanga, ngā rangatōpū, me ngā tāngata whai rawa, e patu ana i a mātou, te iwi Māori, ngā iwi o te ao, me ō mātou mātua, a Ranginui rāua ko Papatūānuku,” e ai ki a Warmenhoven.

    Tui Warmenhoven and Dr Russel Norman in front of Rainbow Warrior III on 10 July 2025. Image:Te Ao Māori News

    A defining moment in Aotearoa’s nuclear-free stand
    “The bombing of the Rainbow Warrior was a defining moment for Greenpeace in its willingness to fight for a nuclear-free world,” said Dr Russel Norman, the executive director of Greenpeace Aotearoa.

    He noted it was also a defining moment for Aotearoa in the country’s stand against the United States and France, who conducted nuclear tests in the region.

    Greenpeace Aotearoa executive director Dr Russel Norman speaking at the ceremony on board Rainbow Warrior III today. Image: Te Ao Māpri News

    In 1987, the New Zealand Nuclear Free Zone, Disarmament, and Arms Control Act officially declared the country a nuclear-free zone.

    This move angered the United States, especially due to the ban on nuclear-powered or nuclear-armed ships entering New Zealand ports.

    Because the US followed a policy of neither confirming nor denying the presence of nuclear weapons, it saw the ban as breaching the ANZUS Treaty and suspended its security commitments to New Zealand.

    The Rainbow Warrior’s final voyage before it was bombed was Operation Exodus, during which the crew helped relocate more than 320 residents of Rongelap Atoll in the Marshall Islands, who had been exposed to radiation from US nuclear testing between 1946 and 1958.

    The evacuation of Rongelap Islanders to Mejatto by the Rainbow Warrior crew in May 1985. Image: Greenpeace/Fernando Pereira

    The legacy of Operation Exodus
    Between 1946 and 1958, the United States carried out 67 nuclear tests in the Marshall Islands.

    For decades, it denied the long-term health impacts, even as cancer rates rose and children were born with severe deformities.

    Despite repeated pleas from the people of Rongelap to be evacuated, the US government failed to act until Greenpeace stepped in to help.

    “The United States government effectively used them as guinea pigs for nuclear testing and radiation to see what would happen to people, which is obviously outrageous and disgusting,” Dr Norman said.

    He said it was important not to see Pacific peoples as victims, as they were powerful campaigners who played a leading role in ending nuclear testing in the region.

    Marshallese women greet the Rainbow Warrior as it arrived in the capital Majuro in March 2025. Image: Bianca Vitale/Greenpeace

    Between March and April this year, Rainbow Warrior III returned to the Marshall Islands to conduct independent research into the radiation levels across the islands to see whether it’s safe for the people of Rongelap to return.

    What advice do you give to this generation about nuclear issues?
    “Kia kotahi ai koutou ki te whai i ngā mahi uaua i mua i a mātou ki te whawhai i a rātou mā, e mahi tūkino ana ki tō mātou ao, ki tō mātou kōkā a Papatūānuku, ki tō mātou taiao,” hei tā Tui Warmenhoven.

    A reminder to stay united in the difficult world ahead in the fight against threats to the environment.

    Warmenhoven also encouraged Māori to support Greenpeace Aotearoa.

    Tui Warmenhoven and the captain of the Rainbow Warrior, Ali Schmidt, placed a wreath in the water at the stern of the ship in memory of Fernando Pereira. Image: Greenpeace

    Dr Norman believed the younger generations should be inspired to activism by the bravery of those from the Pacific and Greenpeace who campaigned for a nuclear-free world 40 years ago.

    “They were willing to take very significant risks, they sailed their boats into the nuclear test zone to stop those nuclear tests, they were arrested by the French, beaten up by French commandos,” he said.

    Republished from Te Ao Māori News with permission.

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-OSI USA: Senate Passes Legislation to Rescind Wasteful Federal Spending

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator Kevin Cramer (R-ND)

    WASHINGTON, D.C. – By a vote of 51 to 48 the United States Senate advanced the Rescissions Act of 2025 to rescind $9 billion in unnecessary, wasteful federal funds. The bill, which passed the House of Representatives in June by a vote of 214 to 212, will now return to the House for final consideration.

    The Rescissions Act of 2025 formalizes $9 billion in requested cuts made by the Trump administration. The bill contains 20 targeted rescissions of unobligated balances. Under the Impoundment Control Act, Congress must address the administration’s requested cuts within a 45-day window, or the funding remains in federal coffers. The bill must be sent to President Trump’s desk by Friday.

    U.S. Senator Kevin Cramer (R-ND), a member of the Senate DOGE Caucus, issued the following statement after voting in favor of the rescissions package:

    “After four years of reckless spending by the Biden administration, President Trump is right to request this cut in wasteful spending and Congress was right to pass it. This bill reclaims taxpayer dollars for hardworking North Dakotans and Americans, but this is only the beginning. Congress and the administration have a lot more work to do to restore accountability and fiscal sanity to Washington.”

    This rescissions package cuts funding for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB), which funds National Public Radio (NPR) and Public Broadcasting Service (PBS). The Trump administration’s request described the funds as being used to “subsidize a public media system that is politically biased and an unnecessary expense to the taxpayer.”

    While the CPB is legally mandated to be nonpolitical and unbiased, it has funded content celebrating irrevocable ‘gender transitions’ in minors, segments framing healthy eating and doorway sizes as forms of “fatphobia,” and children’s programming featuring drag queens. NPR has published stories on “genderqueer dinosaur enthusiasts,” “nonbinary deer,” and “hermaphrodite banana slugs,” while dismissing the Hunter Biden laptop scandal and pushing the discredited Russia-collusion narrative. In April 2024, Cramer led several of his colleagues in a letter to NPR CEO Katherine Maher, highlighting deep concerns regarding the network’s national leadership and calling for the enforcement of journalistic standards Americans deserve.

    Importantly, these cuts do not impact emergency broadcast capabilities. North Dakota radio stations continue to provide critical emergency services, and all for-profit broadcasters are required by the FCC to maintain an Emergency Alert System (EAS) and typically employ their own meteorologists. FEMA’s Integrated Public Alert & Warning System (IPAWS), and the Next Generation Warning System Grant Program (NGWS) also remain fully funded.

    These rescissions also eliminate funding in foreign-aid accounts antithetical to American interests and outside the scope of Congressional intent.  Taxpayer dollars have been allocated to projects such as promoting veganism in Zambia, funding pride parades in Lesotho, wind farms in Ukraine, DEIA contractors in Belarus, and gender diversity in Mexican street lighting. Other rescinded accounts supported “sedentary migrant” outreach in Colombia, reproductive health climate curricula, and social media mentorship in Eastern Europe—all at the expense of the American taxpayer. At the same time, the Senate bill provides guardrails to protect core Global Health Program funding —PEPFAR, tuberculosis, malaria, maternal and child health, and nutrition. It also protects the Countering PRC Influence Fund and reaffirms commitment to aid in the Middle East.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • Three-person IVF technique spared children from inherited diseases, scientists say

    Source: Government of India

    Source: Government of India (4)

    Eight children in the UK have been spared from devastating genetic diseases thanks to a new threeperson in vitro fertilization technique, scientists from Newcastle University reported on Wednesday.

    The technique, which is banned in the United States, transfers pieces from inside the mother’s fertilized egg – its nucleus, plus the nucleus of the father’s sperm – into a healthy egg provided by an anonymous donor.

    The procedure prevents the transfer of mutated genes from inside the mother’s mitochondria – the cells’ energy factories – that could cause incurable and potentially fatal disorders.

    Mutations in mitochondrial DNA can affect multiple organs, particularly those that require high energy, such as the brain, liver, heart, muscles and kidneys.

    One of the eight children is now 2 years old, two are between ages 1 and 2, and five are infants. All were healthy at birth, with blood tests showing no or low levels of mitochondrial gene mutations, the scientists reported in the New England Journal of Medicine. All have made normal developmental progress, they said.

    The results “are the culmination of decades of work,” not just on the scientific/technical challenges but also in ethical inquiry, public and patient engagement, law-making, drafting and execution of regulations, and establishing a system for monitoring and caring for the mothers and infants, reproductive medicine specialist Dr. Andy Greenfield of the University of Oxford, who was not involved in the research, said in a statement.

    The researchers’ “treasure trove of data” is likely to be the starting point of new avenues of investigation, Greenfield said.

    Often during IVF screening procedures, doctors can identify some low-risk eggs with very few mitochondrial gene mutations that are suitable for implantation.

    But sometimes all of the eggs’ mitochondrial DNA carries mutations. In those cases, using the new technique, the UK doctors first fertilize the mother’s egg with the father’s sperm. Then they remove the fertilized egg’s “pronuclei” – that is, the nuclei of the egg and the sperm, which carry the DNA instructions from both parents for the baby’s development, survival and reproduction.

    Next, they transfer the egg and sperm nuclei into a donated fertilized egg that has had its pronuclei removed.

    The donor egg will now begin to divide and develop with its healthy mitochondria and the nuclear DNA from the mother’s egg and the father’s sperm.

    This process, detailed in a second paper in the journal, “essentially replaces the faulty mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) with healthy mtDNA from the donor,” senior researcher Mary Herbert, professor of reproductive biology at Newcastle, said at a press briefing.

    Blood levels of mtDNA mutations were 95% to 100% lower in six newborns, and 77% to 88% lower in two others, compared to levels of the same variants in their mothers, the researchers reported in a second paper.

    “These data indicate that pronuclear transfer was effective in reducing transmission of mtDNA disease,” they said.

    The procedure was tested in 22 women whose babies were likely to inherit such genes. In addition to the eight women who delivered the children described in this report, another one of the 22 is currently pregnant.

    Seven of the eight pregnancies were uneventful; in one case, a pregnant woman had blood tests showing high lipid levels.

    There have been no miscarriages.

    The authors of the current reports have also tried transplanting the nucleus of a mother’s unfertilized egg into a donor egg and then fertilizing the donor egg afterward, but they believe their new approach may more reliably prevent transmission of the genetic disorders.

    In 2015, the UK became the first country in the world to legalize research into mitochondrial donation treatment in humans.

    That same year in the United States, pronuclear transfer was effectively banned for human use by a congressional appropriations bill that prohibited the Food and Drug Administration from using funds to consider the use of “heritable genetic modification”.

    (Reuters)

  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: LCSD to launch cross-cultural music lecture series “When Chinese landscape painting meets Western classical music” (with photos)

    Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region

         The Leisure and Cultural Services Department will present a cross-cultural music lecture series entitled “When Chinese landscape painting meets Western classical music” from September to October. The eight-lecture series, hosted by music critic William Ting, will explore the connections between Chinese landscape painting and Western classical music through appreciating works of Chinese and Western artists from various perspectives. The programme will also feature live demonstrations by pianist Chung Chi-woo and qin musician Chung Siu-sun in different lectures, offering audiences a fresh perspective on viewing paintings and appreciating music.
     
         Details of each lecture are as follows:

    Lecture 1: “Connect: The Meeting Point of Chinese Painting and Western Music” 
    ————————————————————————————————–
    Date: September 5 (Friday)
    Piano demonstration: Chung Chi-woo

    To provide an overview of the stylistic features and characteristics of Chinese landscape painting and Western classical music across different periods, examining the intersections between them and the similarities in their historical development.

    Lecture 2: “Sublime: Fan Kuan and J.S. Bach” 
    ————————————————————————————————–
    Date: September 12 (Friday)
    Piano demonstration: Chung Chi-woo
     
         To explore the connections between the works of Northern Song dynasty painter Fan Kuan and Baroque music master Bach, and discuss the intersection of “Travelers Among Mountains and Streams” and “The Art of Fugue”, two masterpieces in the history of Chinese painting and Western music.

    Lecture 3: “Transcendent Elegance: Ni Zan and Mozart”
    ————————————————————————————————–
    Date: September 19 (Friday)
    Piano demonstration: William Ting
     
         Through appreciating the works of Yuan dynasty painter Ni Zan and Western classical music composer Mozart, in an attempt to reveal the inner worlds of the two artists while exploring the aesthetic significance and similarities behind their creations.

    Lecture 4: “Visual Melodies: Sound and Music in the Paintings”
    ————————————————————————————————–
    Date: September 26 (Friday)
    Guqin demonstration and explanation: Chung Siu-sun
     
         Featuring a selection of Chinese landscape paintings and Western paintings to explore how to “listen” to the artworks’ audible elements, or how to integrate melodies and musical forms into the paintings with lines and colours, thereby discovering these “visible” sounds.
     
    Lecture 5: “Ancient Worshipping: Dong Qichang and Brahms”
    ————————————————————————————————–
    Date: October 10 (Friday)
    Piano demonstration: Chung Chi-woo
     
         Through examining the works of Ming dynasty painter Dong Qichang and Western classical music composer Brahms, to explore how they both “imitated” their ancient masters while forging new paths for future generations, illustrating the close relationship between arts development and the social environment of their time.
     
    Lecture 6: “The Beauty of Ugliness: Shitao and Beethoven”
    ————————————————————————————————–
    Date: October 17 (Friday)
    Piano demonstration: Chung Chi-woo
     
         To explore how the works of Qing dynasty painter Shitao and Western classical music composer Beethoven take ugliness as a kind of beauty, subverting the aesthetic traditions of their time, thereby offering new perspectives for interpreting these “ugly” creations.
     
    Lecture 7: “Deliberate Blank: Silence and Emptiness in Music and Painting”
    ————————————————————————————————–
    Date: October 24 (Friday)
    Piano demonstration: Chung Chi-woo

         To analyse how the technique of “deliberate blank” in Chinese ink painting infuses works with “spiritual energy” and stimulates the viewers’ imagination, and how different uses of “silence” in Western music express emotions and imbue music with deeper meaning.
     
    Lecture 8: “Inner Beauty: Fou Ts’ong and Huang Binhong”
    ————————————————————————————————–
    Date: October 31 (Friday)
    Piano demonstration: William Ting
     
         To explore how the essence of Chinese culture is reflected in the musical approach of pianist Fou Ts’ong from the perspective of musical interpretation, and how these relate to painter Huang Binhong’s works.
     
         William Ting graduated from Hong Kong Baptist University and received his Master Degree in Historical Musicology from Royal Holloway, University of London. He is currently a life member of the International Association of Theatre Critics (Hong Kong). As a local music critic, Ting’s writings are widely published in art magazines, newspapers and online. As a musicologist, Ting has conducted numerous public lectures in recent years including Baroque Music Lecture Series: Bach & Beyond in 2022.
     
         Chung Chi-woo earned his Master Degree in Piano Performance from the Manhattan School of Music in the United States. He has performed solo recitals and chamber performances across Europe and the United States and participated in many music festivals and master classes. Chung Siu-sun is a pupil of seasoned virtuoso of guqin Sou Si-tai, studying both guqin and xiao. He contributed his guqin expertise to the album “Gem of Ci Poetry Music” in recent years. He is currently the general officer of the Deyin Qin Society. 
     
         All lectures will be conducted in Cantonese and start at 7.30pm in the Lecture Hall of the Hong Kong Space Museum. Each lecture will run for about one hour and 30 minutes. Tickets priced at $80 (for each lecture, with free seating) are now available at URBTIX (www.urbtix.hk). For telephone bookings, please call 3166 1288. For programme enquiries, please call 2268 7321 or visit www.lcsd.gov.hk/CE/CulturalService/Programme/en/music/programs_1886.html.

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News

  • Trump says he’s not planning to fire Fed’s Powell

    Source: Government of India

    Source: Government of India (4)

    U.S. President Donald Trump said Wednesday he is not planning to fire Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, but he kept the door open to the possibility and renewed his criticism of the central bank chief for not lowering interest rates.

    A Bloomberg report earlier Wednesday saying that Trump was likely to fire Powell soon sparked a drop in stocks and the dollar, and a rise in Treasury yields.

    Trump, who has been criticizing Powell on an almost daily basis for being “TOO LATE” to cut interest rates, said the report wasn’t true. But Trump confirmed he had floated the idea with Republican lawmakers on Tuesday evening, marking the latest chapter in an escalating campaign by Trump against the independent central bank and its embattled chief.

    “I don’t rule out anything, but I think it’s highly unlikely unless he has to leave for fraud,” Trump said, a reference to recent White House and Republican lawmaker criticism of cost overruns in the $2.5 billion renovation of the Fed’s historic headquarters in Washington. There has been no evidence of fraud, and the Fed has pushed back on criticism of its handling of the project.

    Powell, who was nominated by Trump during his first term in late 2017 to lead the Fed and then nominated for a second term by Democratic President Joe Biden four years later, has repeatedly said he intends to serve out his term, which runs through May 15, 2026. A recent Supreme Court opinion has solidified a long-standing interpretation of the law that the Fed chair cannot be fired over policy differences but only “for cause.”

    In an interview aired later on Wednesday, Trump was again asked if he was thinking of removing Powell. “I’d love it if he wants to resign, that would be up to him,” Trump told the Real America’s Voice. “They say it would disrupt the market if I did.”

    Treasury yields pared declines and stocks ended the day higher after Trump’s comments, which included the familiar complaint that Powell is a “terrible” chair for keeping the Fed’s short-term policy rate in the 4.25%-4.50% range since December while the central bank assesses the impact of sharply higher tariffs on inflation.

    Trump blames the Fed for higher long-term rates that increase the cost of U.S. government borrowing. His attacks on Powell have continued since his signing on July 4 of the “Big Beautiful Bill,” the tax and spending bill that independent analysts say will add trillions of dollars to the U.S. deficit.

    “A HUGE MISTAKE”

    Republican Senator Thom Tillis of North Carolina, who opposed the tax bill and has since said he won’t run for reelection, on Wednesday delivered a spirited defense of an independent Fed, which economists say is the linchpin of U.S. financial and price stability.

    “There’s been some talk about potentially firing the Fed chair,” said Tillis, a member of the Senate Banking Committee, which oversees the Fed and confirms presidential nominations to its Board. Subjecting the Fed to direct presidential control would be a “huge mistake,” he said.

    “The consequences of firing a Fed chair, just because political people don’t agree with that economic decision, will be to undermine the credibility of the United States going forward, and I would argue if it happens you are going to see a pretty immediate response, and we’ve got to avoid that,” said Tillis.

    Other Republicans downplayed the possibility of Trump’s firing Powell.

    Asked if it would be a problem for Trump to fire Powell, Senate Majority Leader John Thune told reporters: “My understanding is he doesn’t have any intention of doing that.”

    “President Trump’s own analysis and that of his Treasury secretary is that he cannot fire Jay Powell,” House Financial Services Committee Chair French Hill told CNBC earlier on Wednesday.

    RENOVATIONS AT THE FED

    Last week, the White House appeared to try to lay the groundwork for firing Powell for cause when the director of the Office of Management and Budget, Russell Vought, sent Powell a letter saying that Trump was “extremely troubled” by the renovations of two Fed buildings.

    Powell responded by asking the U.S. central bank’s inspector general to review the project. The central bank also posted a “frequently asked questions” fact sheet, which rebutted some of Vought’s assertions about VIP dining rooms and elevators that he said added to the costs.

    “Nobody is fooled by President Trump and Republicans’ sudden interest in building renovations — it’s clear pretext to fire Fed Chair Powell,” Elizabeth Warren, the top Democrat on the Senate Banking Committee and herself a longtime critic of Powell, posted on X. Warren was the committee’s only member to vote against Powell’s renomination as chair in 2022, saying he had not done enough on regulation.

    Fed policymakers are worried that, with 40-year-high inflation only recently in the rear-view mirror, any bump up in inflation coupled with a too-early cut to short-term borrowing costs could ignite expectations that inflation is back, a potentially self-fulfilling prophecy that could weaken the economy and undermine progress on price stability.

    Analysts said they feared the pressure campaign on Powell would continue — with deleterious effects on the Fed’s ability to do its congressionally mandated job of both keeping prices stable and maximizing employment.

    “Any reduction in the independence of the Fed would likely add upside risks to an inflation outlook that is already subject to upward pressures from tariffs and somewhat elevated inflation expectations,” wrote JP Morgan chief U.S. economist Michael Feroli, who said he doubts the “saga” of the president’s repeated threats to remove Powell is over.

    Feroli and others noted that continued pressure on Powell would likely push up longer-term interest rates as investors demand more protection from the risk of higher inflation — making U.S. government borrowing more, not less, expensive.

    The “formal process” for identifying a successor to Powell is under way, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has said. Bessent is one candidate for the job, along with White House economic adviser Kevin Hassett, former Fed Governor Kevin Warsh and Fed Governor Christopher Waller.

    (Reuters)

  • MIL-OSI USA: Grassley-Led HALT Fentanyl Act Becomes Law

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Iowa Chuck Grassley

    WASHINGTON – President Donald Trump today signed the Halt All Lethal Trafficking of (HALT) Fentanyl Act into law, permanently classifying illicit, fentanyl-related substances as Schedule I. The bipartisan and bicameral legislation was led by Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Chairman Bill Cassidy, M.D. (R-La.) and Sen. Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.).

    “The HALT Fentanyl Act is now the law of the land, marking a major victory in America’s fight against fentanyl,” Grassley said. “By permanently classifying fentanyl-related substances as Schedule I, the HALT Fentanyl Act will save American lives and prevent deadly fentanyl knockoffs from making their way into Iowa communities. I applaud President Trump’s action today, as well as his ongoing commitment to turning the corner on the Biden administration’s disastrous policies and creating a safer America.”  

    Download photos HERE. 

    Download bill text HERE and a fact sheet HERE.  

    Background:

    The HALT Fentanyl Act was introduced by Grassley, Cassidy and Heinrich in January, advanced by the Senate Judiciary Committee in February, passed by the Senate in March and passed by the House of Representatives in June. Both houses of Congress passed the bill by overwhelming margins.

    The bipartisan bill is supported by over 40 major advocacy groups, including a coalition of over 200 impacted family groups and law enforcement organizations representing over a million officers. Learn more about the bill’s widespread support HERE.

    -30-

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Senator Marshall: Our National Debt is the Biggest Problem Our Country Faces

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Kansas Roger Marshall

    Senator Marshall Joins CNN to Talk About The Rescissions Package
    Washington – On Wednesday, U.S. Senator Roger Marshall, M.D. (R-Kansas), joined Jake Tapper on CNN’s The Lead with Jake Tapper to discuss the rescissions package and how out-of-control Congressional spending is the biggest issue facing America.

    Click HERE or on the image above to watch Senator Marshall’s full interview.
    On whether the Senate should take orders from the White House on spending:
    “I think the biggest problem that this country faces is our $37 trillion national debt, that we’re spending a trillion dollars a year on interest. If you think about where these cuts are coming from, USAID, our own Government Accounting Office, our own Inspector General have said that USAID is the systemic risk. That there’s significant fraud, waste, and abuse going on. That they don’t really have an audit system.
    “So we have identified with Congressional review significant waste and fraud. Think about  USAID. Just recently, a $500 million fraud scheme of bribes [uncovered] here in this country, overseeing those programs. In New Guinea $100 million embezzlement issue, or $50 million of waste on medical equipment in Zambia. So the fraud, the waste, the abuse, is out there. We need to do something. And this is some, I would say, low-hanging fruit. I wish we had a bigger rescission package.”
    On the Congressional spending problems facing the country:
    “Well, certainly Congress has a spending problem, and we need to address that. But I think that we want to be frugal with our money. I was taught to be frugal, to be concerned with other people’s money, which is what this is, and to take the very best care of it that I can.
    “I don’t care how much debt we’re in or even if we had a surplus, I don’t want to see waste and fraud like we’ve been seeing through USAID. I do think that both parties need to do a better job of working towards a balanced budget. Again, our national debt is the biggest problem our country faces long term.”

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Health – ProCare welcomes fast-tracked registration for overseas doctors

    Source: ProCare

    ProCare welcomes the Medical Council’s decision to recognise overseas-trained doctors from Chile, Croatia, and Luxembourg as part of the “Comparable Health System pathway”. Alongside the fast-track registration for GPs from the USA, Canada, and Singapore, this will deliver a much-needed boost to general practices across Aotearoa who are facing a significant GP shortage.

    The decision means ProCare will be better placed to support its primary care network to recruit offshore GPs; further helping to ease workforce pressure and improve access to care for communities.

    Bindi Norwell, Chief Executive at ProCare, says the organisation is ready to support practices to take full advantage of the change.

    “We know our practices are under pressure and this change gives us a practical way to bring in skilled clinicians faster,” says Norwell.

    Under the changes, GPs from the United States, Canada and Singapore will have their registration applications processed within two months, while specialists from countries such as the UK, Ireland and Australia will benefit from a fast-tracked 20-day assessment process. Japan and South Korea were added to the list in February 2025.

    “At ProCare, we are deeply committed to investing in the primary care workforce. We’ve long advocated for practical solutions that support our network and improve health outcomes for our communities. This announcement aligns with that vision.”

    Earlier this month, ProCare became an Immigration NZ Accredited Employer, allowing it to directly support practices with international recruitment and immigration processes.

    “We’re actively investing in solutions for primary care that make a difference,” says Norwell. “Our investment includes tailored support for general practice teams, leadership development, and tools to improve retention and resilience. We’re committed to building a strong, sustainable workforce that delivers better health outcomes for all New Zealanders.”

    ProCare will continue working closely with its network and partners to ensure overseas-trained doctors are welcomed, supported, and integrated into the communities where they’re needed most.

    Learn about ProCare’s Investment in Workforce: https://www.procare.co.nz/about-us/investment-in-workforce/

    About ProCare

    ProCare is a leading healthcare provider that aims to deliver the most progressive, pro-active and equitable health and wellbeing services in Aotearoa. We do this through our clinical support services, mental health and wellness services, virtual/tele health, mobile health, smoking cessation and by taking a population health and equity approach to our mahi. As New Zealand’s largest Primary Health Organisation, we represent a network of general practice teams and healthcare professionals who provide care to more than 830,000 people across Auckland and Northland. These practices serve the largest Pacific and South Asian populations enrolled in general practice and the largest Māori population in Tāmaki Makaurau. For more information go to www.procare.co.nz

    MIL OSI New Zealand News

  • MIL-OSI USA: REMARKS: Senator Coons condemns deep cuts to humanitarian and disaster aid in moving speech on Senate floor

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Delaware Christopher Coons
    WASHINGTON – U.S. Senator Chris Coons (D-Del.) delivered a floor speech today condemning proposed Republican-led efforts to axe humanitarian and disaster relief funding, and eliminate publicly broadcast emergency alerts for rural communities in the latest budget rescission package. The cuts, totaling approximately $9 billion, or roughly 0.1% of the federal budget, target critical aid programs including the World Food Program, UNICEF, Catholic Relief Services, Save the Children, and disaster response efforts around the globe. During his speech, Senator Coons said the cuts not only undermine America’s values, but they also betray the moral teachings at the heart of our faith traditions.
    “Jesus wept,” Senator Coons began, referencing the Gospel of John. Senator Coons warned that the proposed $9 billion in rescissions, which include drastic reductions to food assistance, refugee aid, and disaster response, would cause similar needless suffering to our most vulnerable. “For God’s justice is swift and sure, and I tremble when I think about the answer this chamber will give today to the question, who is my neighbor? Ladies and gentlemen of the Senate, we should turn aside. We should not, with this act and this vote today, make Jesus weep.”
    Despite the focus of President Trump and his Republican allies in Congress on cutting foreign aid this year, the United States spends less than 1% of its annual budget on foreign assistance. The money feeds starving children, combats epidemics overseas before they reach American shores, helps us strengthen partnerships and alliances, and is critical in helping us outcompete China.
    “I was on a bipartisan trip to the Philippines just a few months ago with Senator Ricketts, and I was struck to learn that the Philippines of all the nations on Earth is the most prone to natural disasters,” Senator Coons continued. “They value our partnership, our alliance. We’ve been security partners for decades. There’s many Filipino-Americans. There’s a close and deep relationship. But in meeting with their national leaders, their elected leaders, their senators and their ministers of their cabinet, they said, you know, it makes an incredible difference here in the Philippines: every time there’s a typhoon, there’s an earthquake, there’s a volcano, it’s the Americans who come. It’s the Americans who deliver the aid, who help us help ourselves with training and equipment and support.”
    Shortly afterward, Senator Coons offered an amendment on the Senate floor to strip out $496 million of the cuts that target international disaster relief.
    A video and transcript of Senator Coons’ remarks are available below.
    WATCH HERE.
    Senator Coons: Jesus wept. Jesus wept. Most of us who grew up in bible-believing households know this is the shortest verse in all of Scripture, and in some ways the most powerful – one that haunts me. Jesus wept in John, the 11th chapter, 35th verse, because he had come too late, seemingly, to save the life of Lazarus. He wept because someone he knew and loved had died, and it had caused such harm and loss to his family. Today we are doing something on this floor of this Senate – my Republican colleagues are doing something on the floor of this Senate – that I believe would make Jesus weep.
    In Luke, there’s a moment in the 10th chapter where a lawyer – and it’s always a lawyer – comes to test Jesus, and trying to justify himself, presses Jesus with questions: “What must I do to gain eternal life?” And Jesus says, “what does the Scripture teach?” He says, “You should love the Lord your God with all your heart, all your soul, and all your mind. And the second commandment is like unto it, you should love your neighbor as yourself.” Jesus says, “you have read well. Do this and you will gain eternal life.” But the lawyer, hoping to be justified says – “but, but, but wait. Who is my neighbor?” And what follows is the well-known parable of the good Samaritan where the righteous, the priestly, the respected, the powerful walk on the other side of the road when they encounter someone who’s been set upon by robbers. Not my problem, not my neighbor. But in the parable of the good Samaritan, it’s this person – a Samaritan from a disfavored ethnicity, someone outside the circle of concern to the ancient Israelites – who does the right thing.
    This parable would have been shocking at the time that it was preached by Jesus. The idea that the “good neighbor” was the outcast – the unexpected – would be something that frankly would have been a surprise. So although today being a ‘good Samaritan’ is a common term, it’s important to know the history. We are taught as children that we are to see all as our neighbors, not just those who live next door, not just those who look like us or speak like us or pray like us, but the widest possible definition of neighbor is what we are called through righteousness to see in the world.
    And what a difference it has made. Because our nation has for decades embraced the cause of being present, of caring, of making lifesaving differences to young mothers and children, to widows and orphans, to the imprisoned, to the hungry, to the refugee, to those fleeing oppression, to those seeking relief from authoritarian governments, for those seeking a better way. We are all God’s children, and from childhood we are taught that the Golden Rule, which appears in virtually every religion – do unto others as you would have them unto to you – is the very foundation of the goodness of America, that we care for each other as neighbors, and we care for the world as neighbors. Yes, we are the most charitable, giving, philanthropic, engaged nation on Earth. And yet all that we do in foreign aid is less than 1% of our total federal budget.
    Months ago, when Elon Musk and DOGE began roaming about the federal agencies of our government, their first target was that that delivers disaster relief, that helps feed the hungry, that helps welcome the refugee, that helps stabilize countries going through turmoil. They laid off thousands. They shut down programs. They canceled billions [of dollars]. And yet, here today we are at it again. Republicans are proposing even deeper cuts.
    I want to talk about one area of the many that will be cut, I fear, later today: disaster assistance. Our nation has been riveted as we’ve watched the tragedy that unfolded in the Texas Hill Country, where a raging river killed dozens and dozens of innocent children. And you know, around the world, when disaster strikes, it is the Americans who show up first. It is Americans who show up with relief, with assistance, with skill and talent and ability.
    It’s been this way for decades and it should be this way still. I was on a bipartisan trip to the Philippines just a few months ago with Senator Ricketts, and I was struck to learn that the Philippines, of all the nations on Earth, is the most prone to natural disasters. They value our partnership, our alliance. We’ve been security partners for decades. There’s many Filipino-Americans. There’s a close and deep relationship. But in meeting with their national leaders, their elected leaders, their senators and their ministers of their cabinet, they said, you know, it makes an incredible difference here in the Philippines: every time there’s a typhoon, there’s an earthquake, there’s a volcano, it’s the Americans who come. It’s the Americans who deliver the aid, who help us help ourselves with training and equipment and support. And you know, in the excess of DOGE’s deep cuts, they fired and laid off most of our experts who are capable of delivering world-class disaster relief.
    We saw the consequences with an earthquake in Myanmar just three months ago, where the few remaining folks who did this work were laid off as they were deployed. And instead, the response was led by the Chinese. We are driving nations into the open arms of our adversaries. We have long been known as a nation that sought to be respected, admired, believed in, embraced, not for the example of our power, but by the power of our example. That when there were dread pandemics killing millions, America showed up. 
    One of the positives of this day is that my Republican colleagues have recoiled from fully shutting down PEPFAR, and that is a positive. One of the best things we’ve ever done as a nation is to save 27 million lives across the world that otherwise would have been lost to HIV and AIDS. But I’ll tell you, when Ebola raged across Africa in 2014, I was the one member of Congress who went to Liberia at the request of the president – a Nobel Peace Prize winner, a brave and proud leader of a nation struggling facing massive losses of life. Projections at the early stages of the Ebola pandemic were that a fifth to a quarter of their population would die in a matter of weeks. And who came to help? The Americans. Catholic Relief Services, Save the Children, CARE, the U.S. military, our public health service. 
    I’ll never forget meeting a young Liberian named Alvin. He dropped out of college to become a physician’s assistant to help when the outbreak began and he in caring for patients himself contracted Ebola – a near certain death sentence. Yet, Alvin was evacuated by Americans to the Ebola treatment center set up and funded and equipped by Americans. And his life was saved by Americans. Whether it was the president of the nation, Ellen Johnson Sirleaf, or Alvin, the folks I met on that trip to Liberia thanked and praised the American people for our decency, our kindness, our seeing them as our neighbor in their moment of deepest struggle, risk, and loss. And yet today – yet today – my colleagues would rather trim one-tenth of 1% of the budget, $9 billion, to cut deeper into food aid and disaster assistance and fighting pandemics, all to justify a tax cut.
    I can think of few more despicable acts on this floor in my 15 years. I can speak to process. We have a bipartisan appropriations process where we can and should debate and consider these further cuts, and put them on the floor, and vote them up. But this is an odd thing. It’s a rescission. It is a cutting back further of money we’ve already appropriated. Just a few minutes later today, I will be trying to get votes to end $465 million of further cuts in disaster assistance that’ll be on the floor today. Taking money from the World Food Program and UNICEF, from Red Cross and Save the Children, from Catholic Relief Services and World Vision. Folks may think at home that this money that goes out to the world is money better spent here, but for the pennies on the federal dollar that we spend responding to disasters around the world, organizations we all know and the majority of us believe in and support, like the Red Cross, World Vision, or Catholic Relief Services are able to appear in time and deliver lifesaving aid. 
    Think about what we are doing. Think about the example we are setting. Think about what we are teaching our children. Open your hearts and eyes and realize what we are about to do. This is a nation of which I am so proud, and yet at times it does things of which I am so ashamed. I cannot imagine the faces in the refugee camps, in the villages, in the clinics, in the schools, in the towns, in the cities around the world, who for years have been used to the idea that when there’s a pandemic, the Americans come; that when there’s an earthquake, the Americans come; that when there is starvation, the Americans come. Today we will vote, “no, we won’t.” We are more interested in ourselves and in a bigger tax cut than we are in saving starving children, people laid low by the devastation of an earthquake, families separated by a typhoon. The best part of this nation – what truly makes us great – is our selfless giving to others. We will be judged by how we act today. For God’s justice is swift and sure, and I tremble when I think about the answer this chamber will give today to the question, who is my neighbor?
    Ladies and gentlemen of the Senate, we should turn aside. We should not, with this act and this vote today, make Jesus weep.

    MIL OSI USA News