Category: United States of America

  • MIL-OSI USA: S. 842, No Hezbollah In Our Hemisphere Act

    Source: US Congressional Budget Office

    S. 842 would require the Administration to assess and report to the Congress whether jurisdictions in Latin America could be designated as terrorist sanctuaries, as defined under the Foreign Relations Authorization Act of Fiscal Year 1988 and 1989. To inform that determination, the bill specifically directs the Administration to consider whether such jurisdictions have allowed Hezbollah to operate freely within their borders. S. 842 also would authorize the Administration to restrict visas for any government officials from areas designated as terrorist sanctuaries unless those officials have taken significant action to prevent terrorist activity within their jurisdiction.

    Under current law, the Administration can restrict visas for individuals who support terrorist activity. If the enactment of S. 842 leads the Administration to broaden those sanctions, more people would be denied visas by the Department of State, resulting in an insignificant decrease in revenues from fees. Although most visa fees are retained by the Department of State and spent, some collections are deposited into the Treasury as revenues. Denying foreign nationals entry into the United States also would reduce direct spending on federal benefits (emergency Medicaid or federal subsidies for health insurance, for example) for which those people might otherwise be eligible.

    On the basis of data about similar visa restrictions, CBO estimates any additional visa restrictions imposed under the bill would affect a small number of people. Thus, enacting S. 842 would decrease revenues and direct spending by insignicant amounts, and would, on net, reduce deficits by insignificant amounts over the 2025-2035 period.

    S. 842 would require the Administration to report to the Congress whenever it waives the imposition of sanctions authorized by the bill. Using information about the cost of reports similar to those required by the bill, CBO estimates that implementing S. 842 would cost less than $500,000 over the 2025-2030 period. Such related spending would be subject to the availability of appropriated funds.

    The CBO staff contact for this estimate is Emma Uebelhor. The estimate was reviewed by Christina Hawley Anthony, Deputy Director of Budget Analysis.

    Phillip L. Swagel

    Director, Congressional Budget Office

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI: GraniteShares Announces Change in ETF Lineup

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    NEW YORK, May 19, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — GraniteShares announced today that it will close and liquidate the following ETF:

    Ticker Fund Name Commencement of investment operations
    TSLI GraniteShares 1x Short AMD Daily ETF 08/23/2023

    On May 09, 2025, the board of GraniteShares ETF Trust approved the liquidation of the GraniteShares 1x Short AMD Daily ETF (the “ETF”). The last day of trading for the ETF on NASDAQ Stock Market will be June 20, 2025. The last day creation orders will be accepted for the ETF will be June 18, 2025. Investors may sell their shares of the ETF until market close on June 20, 2025. Shares of the ETF will no longer trade on NASDAQ Stock Market after market close on June 20, 2025, and will be subsequently delisted. The final distribution to shareholders of the ETF is expected to occur on or about June 23, 2025.

    When the ETF commences the liquidation of its portfolio, it may hold cash and securities that may not be consistent with the ETF’s investment objectives and strategies.

    At the time the liquidation of the ETF is complete, the ETF shares will be individually redeemed. For shareholders that still hold shares of the ETF as of June 20, 2025, shares will be automatically redeemed for cash at the net asset value as of close of business on that date, which will reflect the costs of closing the ETF. Shareholders will generally recognize a capital gain or loss on the redemptions. The ETF may or may not pay one or more dividends or other distributions prior to or along with the redemption payments.

    About GraniteShares

    GraniteShares is an independent ETF issuer headquartered in New York City. GraniteShares will continue to offer the following leveraged single stock ETFs:

    ETF NAME TICKER UNDERLYING STOCK MANAGEMENT FEE/TOTAL EXPENSES
           
    GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF AAPB Apple 0.99%/1.15%
    GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF AMDL AMD 0.99%/1.15%
    GraniteShares 2x Long AMZN Daily ETF AMZZ Amazon.com 0.99%/1.15%
    GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF BABX Alibaba 0.99%/1.15%
    GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF CONL Coinbase 0.99%/1.15%
    GraniteShares 2x Short COIN Daily ETF CONI Coinbase 0.99%/1.15%
    GraniteShares 2x Long CRWD Daily ETF CRWL CrowdStrike 1.30%/1.50%
    GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF DLLL Dell Technologies 1.30%/1.50%
    GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF INTW Intel 1.30%/1.50%
    GraniteShares 2x Long IONQ Daily ETF IONL IONQ 1.30%/1.50%
    GraniteShares 2x Long LCID Daily ETF LCDL Lucid 0.99%/1.15%
    GraniteShares 2x Long MARA Daily ETF MRAL MARA Holding 1.30%/1.50%
    GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF FBL Meta Platform 0.99%/1.15%
    GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF MVLL Marvell Technology 1.30%/1.50%
    GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF MSFL Microsoft 0.99%/1.15%
    GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF MULL Micron Technology 1.30%/1.50%
    GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF NVDL NVIDIA 0.99%/1.15%
    GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF NVD NVIDIA 0.99%/1.15%
    GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF PTIR Palantir 0.99%/1.15%
    GraniteShares 2x Long QCOM Daily ETF QCML Qualcomm 1.30%/1.50%
    GraniteShares 2x Long RDDT Daily ETF RDTL Reddit 1.30%/1.50%
    GraniteShares 2x Long RIVN Daily ETF RVNL Rivian 0.99%/1.15%
    GraniteShares 2x Long SMCI Daily ETF SMCL Super Micro Computer 1.30%/1.50%
    GraniteShares 1.25x Long TSLA Daily ETF TSL Tesla 0.99%/1.15%
    GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF TSLR Tesla 0.99%/1.15%
    GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF TSDD Tesla 0.99%/1.15%
    GraniteShares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF TSML Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing 1.30%/1.50%
    GraniteShares 2x Long Uber Daily ETF UBRL Uber 0.99%/1.15%
    GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF VRTL Vertiv 1.30%/1.50%
           

    In addition, GraniteShares’ ETF suite includes the following ETFs:

    Contact Information:
    William Rhind, CEO
    GraniteShares Inc
    +1 646 876 5049
    william.rhind@graniteshares.com

    Important Information

    Investors should consider the investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses of the GraniteShares funds (the “Funds”) carefully before investing. For a prospectus or summary prospectus with this and other information about the Funds, please call (844) 476 8747, or visit the website at www.graniteshares.com. Read the prospectus or summary prospectus carefully before investing.

    To obtain a prospectus for BAR, please visit
    https://www.graniteshares.com/Documents/25/Prospectus-GraniteShares-Gold-Trust.pdf
    To obtain a prospectus for PLTM, please visit
    https://graniteshares.com/media/gwrbh3ah/pltm_prospectus.pdf
    To obtain a prospectus for COMB, please visit
    https://graniteshares.com/media/4crf2x4e/graniteshares-etf-trust-comb-summary-prospectus.pdf

    Except as described above regarding the liquidation of the ETFs, shares of the Funds may be sold during trading hours on the exchange through any brokerage account, shares are not individually redeemable, and shares may only be redeemed directly from a Fund by Authorized Participants. There can be no assurance that an active trading market for shares in a Fund will develop or be maintained. Shares may trade above or below NAV. Brokerage commissions will apply.

    Fund Risks

    Multiple funds have a limited operating history of less than a year and risks associated with a new fund. The Leveraged and Daily Inverse Funds are not suitable for all investors. The investment program of the funds is speculative, entails substantial risks and include asset classes and investment techniques not employed by most ETFs and mutual funds. Investments in the ETFs are not bank deposits and are not insured or guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or any other government agency. The Fund is designed to be utilized only by knowledgeable investors who understand the potential consequences of seeking daily leveraged (2X) or daily inverse (-1X and -2X) investment results, understand the risks associated with the use of leverage and are willing to monitor their portfolios frequently. For periods longer than a single day, the Fund will lose money if the Underlying Stock’s performance is flat, and it is possible that the Fund will lose money even if the Underlying Stock’s performance increases over a period longer than a single day. An investor could lose the full principal value of his/her investment within a single day. The funds do not directly invest in the underlying stock.

    The Funds seek daily inverse or leveraged investment results and are intended to be used as short-term trading vehicles. Each Fund with “Long” in its name attempts to provide daily investment results that correspond to the respective long leveraged multiple of the performance of an underlying stock (each a Leveraged Long Fund). Each Fund with “Short” in its name attempts to provide daily investment results that correspond to the inverse (or opposite) multiple of the performance of an underlying stock (each an Inverse Fund).

    Investors should note that the Long Leveraged Funds and the Daily Inverse Funds pursue daily leveraged investment objectives and daily inverse investment objectives (respectively), which means that the fund is riskier than alternatives that do not use leverage and inverse strategies because the fund magnifies the performance of their underlying security. The volatility of the underlying security may affect a Funds’ return as much as, or more than, the return of the underlying security.

    For the Leveraged Long Funds because of daily rebalancing and the compounding of each day’s return over time, the return of the Fund for periods longer than a single day will be the result of each day’s returns compounded over the period, which will very likely differ from 200% of the return of the Underlying Stock over the same period. The Fund will lose money if the Underlying Stock’s performance is flat over time, and as a result of daily rebalancing, the Underlying Stock volatility and the effects of compounding, it is even possible that the Fund will lose money over time while the Underlying Stock’s performance increases over a period longer than a single day.

    For the Daily Inverse Funds because of daily rebalancing and the compounding of each day’s return over time, the return of the Fund for periods longer than a single day will be the result of each day’s returns compounded over the period, which will very likely differ from -100% and 200% of the return of the Underlying Stock over the same period. The Fund will lose money if the Underlying Stock’s performance is flat over time, and as a result of daily rebalancing, the Underlying Stock volatility and the effects of compounding, it is even possible that the Fund will lose money over time while the Underlying Stock’s performance decreases over a period longer than a single day.

    Shares are bought and sold at market price (not NAV) and are not individually redeemed from the ETF. There can be no guarantee that an active trading market for ETF shares will develop or be maintained, or that their listing will continue or remain unchanged. Buying or selling ETF shares on an exchange may require the payment of brokerage commissions and frequent trading may incur brokerage costs that detract significantly from investment returns.

    An investment in the Fund involves risk, including the possible loss of principal. The Fund is non-diversified and includes risks associated with the Fund concentrating its investments in a particular industry, sector, or geographic region which can result in increased volatility. The use of derivatives such as futures contracts and swaps are subject to market risks that may cause their price to fluctuate over time. Risks of the Fund include Effects of Compounding and Market Volatility Risk, Inverse Risk, Market Risk, Counterparty Risk, Rebalancing Risk, Intra-Day Investment Risk, Daily Index Correlation Risk, Other Investment Companies (including ETFs) Risk, and risks specific to the securities of the Underlying Stock and the sector in which it operates. These and other risks can be found in the prospectus.

    Investing in physical commodities, including through commodity-linked derivative instruments such as Commodity Futures, Commodity Swaps, as well as other commodity-linked instruments, is speculative and can be extremely volatile and may not be suitable for all investors. Market prices of commodities may fluctuate rapidly based on numerous factors, including: changes in supply and demand relationships (whether actual, perceived, anticipated, unanticipated or unrealized); weather; agriculture; trade; domestic and foreign political and economic events and policies; diseases; pestilence; technological developments; currency exchange rate fluctuations; and monetary and other governmental policies, action and inaction.

    A liquid secondary market may not exist for the types of commodity-linked derivative instruments the Fund buys, which may make it difficult for the Fund to sell them at an acceptable price. The Fund is new with no operating history. As a result, there can be no assurance that the Fund will grow to or maintain an economically viable size, in which case it could ultimately liquidate.

    Derivatives may be more sensitive to changes in market conditions and may amplify risks and losses.

    This information is not an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy shares of any Funds to any person in any jurisdiction in which an offer, solicitation, purchase or sale would be unlawful under the securities laws of such jurisdiction. Please consult your tax advisor about the tax consequences of an investment in Fund shares, including the possible application of foreign, state, and local tax laws. You could lose money by investing in the ETFs. There can be no assurance that the investment objective of the Funds will be achieved. None of the Funds should be relied upon as a complete investment program.

    The Fund is distributed by ALPS Distributors, Inc, which is not affiliated with GraniteShares or any of its affiliates ©2025 GraniteShares Inc. All rights reserved. GraniteShares, GraniteShares Trusts, and the GraniteShares logo are registered and unregistered trademarks of GraniteShares Inc., in the United States and elsewhere. All other marks are the property of their respective owners

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI Video: President Cyril Ramaphosa has arrived in Washington DC for his working visit.

    Source: Republic of South Africa (video statements-2)

    President Cyril Ramaphosa has this afternoon, Monday 19 May 2025 arrived in Washington DC for his working visit.

    The purpose of the visit is to reset and revitalise bilateral relations between South Africa and the United States (US). In this regard, the visit will focus specifically on reframing bilateral, economic and commercial relations.

    On Wednesday, 21 May 2025, President Ramaphosa will meet with President Donald Trump at the White House.

    President Ramaphosa will be accompanied by the following Ministers: Mr Lamola, Minister of International Relations and Cooperation, Ms Ntshavheni, Minister in the Presidency, Mr Tau, Minister of Trade, Industry Competition, Mr Steenhuisen, Minister of Agriculture and Mr Jonas, Special Envoy to the United States of America.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PImRrGyQb8M

    MIL OSI Video

  • MIL-OSI USA: Baldwin Challenges Trump to Close Tax Loophole for Wall Street

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Wisconsin Tammy Baldwin

    WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Senators Tammy Baldwin (D-WI) and Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) led a group of their colleagues in challenging President Donald Trump to end a tax loophole, the carried interest loophole, that benefits wealthy money managers on Wall Street. Senator Baldwin leads legislation to close this loophole and, in February, she pushed for a vote on her amendment to end the tax break during the Senate’s budget resolution debate. While he failed to enact it in his first term, President Trump has been supportive of closing this loophole and has advocated for closing it as recently as this year.

    “During your first campaign, you claimed that the carried interest loophole was ‘ridiculous’ and ‘unfair to American workers’ and that the individuals reaping the benefits from the loophole were ‘getting away with murder.’ We agree,” wrote Baldwin and the lawmakers in a letter to President Trump. “We write to ask that you follow through on your promise to eliminate the carried interest loophole and demand that Congressional Republicans eliminate it in any tax bill they send to your desk.”

    When private equity managers oversee an investment fund, they receive a 20% share of the profits earned from the funds’ investments, called “carried interest.” This interest is not subject to the ordinary income tax rate of 37%, and is instead taxed at the 20% capital gains rate as long as the investments are held for at least three years. As a result, private equity fund managers who routinely make hundreds of millions of dollars are subject to a tax rate lower than that of an average blue-collar worker.

    “Despite the extraordinary profits that private equity funds are raking in each year, the carried interest loophole allows private equity managers to avoid paying their fair share of taxes, often paying tax rates that are lower than middle-class workers,” continued Baldwin and the lawmakers.

    The massive loophole costs the federal government tens of billions of dollars in tax revenue, and the private equity industry regularly donates significant sums to politicians sympathetic to their cause in order to make sure the loophole remains open for their profit. The industry has donated almost $600 million to political campaigns over the last decade to maintain a loophole worth upwards of $63 billion over the next 10 years.

    In addition to Senators Baldwin and Warren, this letter is co-signed by Senators Chris Van Hollen (D-MD), Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI), Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Ron Wyden (D-OR), Amy Klobuchar (D-MN), Jack Reed (D-RI), Peter Welch (D-VT), and Bernie Sanders (I-VT).

    The full letter is available here and below.

    Dear Mr. President:

    We write to ask that you follow through on your promise to eliminate the carried interest loophole and demand that Congressional Republicans eliminate it in any tax bill they send to your desk. 

    During your first campaign, you claimed that the carried interest loophole was “ridiculous” and “unfair to American workers” and that the individuals reaping the benefits from the loophole were “getting away with murder.” We agree. Despite the extraordinary profits that private equity funds are raking in each year, the carried interest loophole allows private equity managers to avoid paying their fair share of taxes, often paying tax rates that are lower than middle-class workers.

    When private equity managers oversee an investment fund, they receive a 20% share of the profits earned from the funds’ investments. This portion of future profits is known as “carried interest.” Although carried interest is essentially salary for private equity managers, it is not subject to the ordinary income tax rate of 37% and instead is taxed at the 20% capital gains rate as long as the investments are held for at least three years. The result? Private equity fund managers who routinely make hundreds of millions of dollars are subject to a tax rate lower than that of an average blue-collar worker making $85,000 a year.

    Though this massive loophole costs the federal government billions of dollars in revenue, efforts to constrain it have consistently fallen short. In a desperate attempt to retain Wall Street’s favorite loophole, the private equity industry doles out eye-popping amounts of campaign cash to curry favor with politicians sympathetic to their cause. And it works. In fact, economists have credited the hedge-fund-led lobbying blitz to the survival of the loophole. Overall, the industry doled out almost $600 million to political campaigns over the last decade, a cheap price tag for a loophole worth upwards of $63 billion over the next ten years.

    It is clear that the private equity industry has fought hard to retain these extraordinary tax giveaways. What is less clear is whether you will allow your party to deviate from your commitments, bow to industry demands, and fail to close the loophole for a second time. You were an avid supporter of closing the carried interest loophole throughout your first campaign and during the first few months of your first administration.  Your chief economic adviser even publicly confirmed in September 2017 that you “remain[ed] committed to ending the carried interest deduction.” Yet, only a few months later, your signature legislative package, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, did virtually nothing to change the loophole.

    Now, you have another opportunity to get the job done. You have once again confirmed your desire to end the loophole, and we understand that last week you asked Speaker Johnson to close the carried interest loophole. Notably, the House Ways and Means Committee defied your wishes and chose to advance legislation that does not eliminate the carried interest loophole.

    So, Mr. President, will you get it done?

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: New AJC Op-Ed: 42,000 New Jobs in Georgia Could Vanish if GOP Tax Bill Passes Warns Warnock

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator Reverend Raphael Warnock – Georgia

    New AJC Op-Ed: 42,000 New Jobs in Georgia Could Vanish if GOP Tax Bill Passes Warns Warnock

    Read the op-ed HERE

    Senator Reverend Warnock penned an op-ed in the Atlanta Journal-Constitution (AJC) outlining how Georgia risks losing up to 42,000 good-paying jobs if Washington Republicans repeal the Inflation Reduction Act’s (IRA) Clean Energy Tax Credits

    These endangered clean energy tax credits support 51 clean energy projects worth over $28 billion, largely outside metro Atlanta

    Senator Reverend Warnock in the AJC: “If the President and Congressional Republicans were serious about bringing American manufacturing back to the United States, as I am, they would protect these tax credits”

    Senator Reverend Warnock in the AJC: “Politics has a way of trying to make easy stuff, complicated. I’ll tell you what’s not complicated – 51 new projects worth $28 billion all across our state and up to 42,000 new jobs”

    Washington, D.C. – U.S. Senator Reverend Raphael Warnock (D-GA) penned an op-ed in the Atlanta Journal-Constitution (AJC) warning that 42,000 good-paying Georgia jobs could be at risk if Congress passes the GOP tax bill, which repeals the Inflation Reduction Act’s (IRA) Clean Energy Tax Credits. The Senator called on his House GOP colleagues to protect good-paying Georgia jobs. 

    “If Washington Republicans move forward with a GOP tax bill that repeals these clean energy tax credits, it’s their districts that will lose jobs and private investments: three out of four clean energy projects that were announced or boosted following the passage of these tax credits have gone to House districts held by Republicans. This is especially true in Georgia: 80% of the projects, 94% of the total investments, and 75% of the proposed new jobs and investments are in Congressional districts represented by Republicans,” warned Senator Reverend Warnock. “By repealing clean energy tax credits to give a tax cut to the wealthy and well-connected, Washington Republicans could cause Georgia to lose up to 42,000 jobs in communities desperate for new jobs and investments. If the President and Congressional Republicans were serious about bringing American manufacturing back to the United States, as I am, they would protect these tax credits.”

    The op-ed follows the release of the Senator’s comprehensive report that found Georgia risks losing up to 42,000 good-paying jobs if Washington Republicans repeal the clean energy tax credits. Since the tax credit’s passage, clean energy jobs and investments exploded across the country, but nowhere was that growth more potent than in Georgia. In less than three years, 51 new projects in Georgia worth over $28 billion have been announced or boosted by the clean energy tax credits. According to the Senator’s report, in Georgia, nearly all the new investments and new jobs are in counties outside of the Atlanta region. Over 70 percent of the new investments and 83 percent of new jobs are in counties with median family incomes below the national median. More than 95 percent of the new jobs and investments are in counties where the percentage of people with a bachelor’s degree is below the national average.

    The full op-ed is available HERE and below. 

    This week, Washington politicians are voting on partisan legislation to cut taxes for billionaires by repealing clean energy tax credits that are creating tens of thousands of manufacturing jobs and are bringing billions of investments to communities across Georgia. It’s up to us to speak out and keep these good-paying, advanced manufacturing jobs coming to communities that are too often overlooked.

    The sad truth is cynical politicians want to repeal these tax credits because they were passed by a Democratic Congress and signed into law by a Democratic president. They’re so focused on the politics that they’re willing to take good-paying jobs, which often don’t require a college degree, away from their constituents. If we set politics aside and center what’s best for ordinary people, there’s no doubt everyone would come together to protect these tax credits and thousands of Georgia jobs.

    During my first term in the Senate, I was proud to champion these clean energy tax credits, which were passed as part of landmark climate legislation in August 2022. Since then, clean energy investment has exploded across Georgia. In less than three years, businesses have announced or advanced 51 new projects worth over $28 billion in our state. In fact, Georgia has benefited from these clean industry tax credits more than any other state. New projects are expected to add nearly 42,000 jobs across all corners of Georgia. More than 95% of these new jobs are outside metro Atlanta, and these projects overwhelmingly benefit places where folks are less likely to have a college degree and don’t earn as much as the average American. 

    This month, I laid out the benefits of these tax credits in a report that outlines Georgia’s Clean Energy Boom. In an era defined by gridlock, Democrats and Republicans across the state agree: these clean energy manufacturing jobs are good for Georgians and their families.

    Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene said solar panel manufacturer Qcells, which will invest over $2.5 billion in projects across Georgia, partially thanks to these tax credits, is “fantastic” and claims her constituents are “excited to have jobs”. Congressman Barry Loudermilk, whose congressional district is home to a future Qcells facility, praised the company’s solar panel production as a “win for our state” and a “great source of jobs”.

    Congressman Buddy Carter has noted that “countless American companies” have used the tax credits to make “major investments” in clean energy. His constituents alone stand to benefit from 11 new clean energy projects representing nearly $7.9 billion in investments and 7,400 new jobs announced after these tax credits were signed into law. The congressman has supported preserving these private sector investments, which he said, “increase domestic manufacturing, promote energy innovation, and keep utility costs down.”

    If Washington Republicans move forward with a GOP tax bill that repeals these clean energy tax credits, it’s their districts that will lose jobs and private investments: three out of four clean energy projects that were announced or boosted following the passage of these tax credits have gone to House districts held by Republicans. This is especially true in Georgia: 80% of the projects, 94% of the total investments, and 75% of the proposed new jobs and investments are in Congressional districts represented by Republicans.

    By repealing clean energy tax credits to give a tax cut to the wealthy and well-connected, Washington Republicans could cause Georgia to lose up to 42,000 jobs in communities desperate for new jobs and investments. If the President and Congressional Republicans were serious about bringing American manufacturing back to the United States, as I am, they would protect these tax credits.

    Politics has a way of trying to make easy stuff, complicated. I’ll tell you what’s not complicated – 51 new projects worth $28 billion all across our state and up to 42,000 new jobs. Georgians are smart enough to know who is actually looking out for them. Now, it’s up to Georgians to ask their Congressional representatives: when the GOP tax bill comes up for a vote, are you going to protect good-paying Georgia jobs?

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Beyer Commends Federal Court Ruling Affirming DOGE Power Grab at USIP Was Illegal

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Representative Don Beyer (D-VA)

    Congressman Don Beyer (D-VA) today issued the following statement welcoming a decision by Judge Beryl A. Howell protecting the United States Institute of Peace (USIP) from executive overreach. Judge Howell’s decision found that the Trump Administration and the “Department of Government Efficiency” (DOGE) acted unlawfully in removing USIP Board members, thereby nullifying subsequent actions, including the Board members’ replacement by officials affiliated with DOGE, the mass firing of USIP staff, and the transfer of USIP property to the General Services Administration (GSA):

    “The Court rightly concluded the Trump Administration and DOGE’s hostile takeover of the Institute was executed without legal authority and in direct violation of congressional statute. This ruling is a decisive victory for the United States Institute of Peace, its dedicated staff, and the rule of law.

    “Congress established the Institute of Peace with the support of Ronald Reagan to advance a safer, more peaceful world. In doing so, it defined the Institute as an independent, 501(c)(3) non-profit and placed clear restrictions on presidential authority to remove Board members. Donald Trump and Elon Musk’s brazen attempts to disregard these legal protections and dismantle this organization inflicted unnecessary trauma on the Institute’s committed leadership and employees, threatened the independence of more than 232,000 other 501(c)(3) non-profits across the country, and undermined American diplomacy.

    “This decision restores the rule of law and protects the Institute’s ability to fulfill its mission of resolving conflict, training peacemakers, and advancing America’s interests through global stability. I will continue to support the United States Institute of Peace and the dedicated professionals who carry out this essential work.”

    Beyer served as a U.S. Ambassador during the Obama Administration. He went to the United States Institute of Peace to conduct congressional oversight amid DOGE’s illegal power grab. He has been an outspoken defender of the United States Institute of Peace, and critic of illegal attempts by the Trump Administration and “DOGE” to dismantle it.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Wasserman Schultz Condemns Supreme Court Order that Empowers Trump to Return Venezuelans to Murderous Dictator

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Representative Debbie Wasserman Schultz (FL-23)

    “Venezuelan TPS holders fled the Maduro regime and built lives in America. They sought refuge in America from his oppression and tyranny. This atrocious decision allows Trump to deport non-criminals back to this murderous dictator. This fight is not over. We must pass my Venezuela TPS Act to keep our community safe.”

    Washington D.C. – Today, U.S. Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (FL-25), co-chair of the Venezuela Democracy Caucus, denounced a U.S. Supreme Court order that would allow the Trump Administration to return hundreds of thousands of Venezuelans right back into the hands of a murderous dictator that they had sought refuge from in coming to America.

    “Venezuelan TPS holders fled the Maduro regime and built lives in America. They sought refuge in America from his oppression and tyranny. This atrocious decision allows Trump to deport non-criminals back to this murderous dictator,” Wasserman Schultz said about the court order. “This fight is not over. We must pass my Venezuela TPS Act to keep our community safe.”

    Wasserman Schultz had led 48 Democratic Members of Congress this month in filing an amicus brief to the Supreme Court in this case, opposing Trump’s attempt to cancel TPS. Lower courts had agreed to temporarily block Trump’s attempt to rescind those TPS protections. But earlier today, the Supreme Court released an unsigned court order that basically allows the Trump Administration to lift those TPS restrictions and begin the mass deportations of Venezuelans who had lawful status just hours ago.

    The Trump Administration seeks to deport as many as 350,000 Venezuelans, despite President Joe Biden redesignating Temporary Protected Status, or TPS, to them last year. Despite being characterized as “criminal illegals” and “dirtbags” by senior Trump Administration officials, TPS recipients must pass continuous background checks and anyone with a criminal record is not eligible for protections.

    Wasserman Schultz has also sponsored bipartisan legislation to restore and redesignate TPS for Venezuelans, led calls to Secretary Noem and Secretary Rubio to demand answers on their TPS betrayal, given worsening political repression and economic conditions in in Venezuela. And the Congresswoman from Weston, Florida, also re-introduced the Venezuelan Adjustment Act to create a pathway to lawful permanent residence for Venezuelan nationals in the United States.

    ####

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: NASA’s Perseverance Mars Rover to Take Bite Out of ‘Krokodillen’

    Source: NASA

    Scientists expect the new area of interest on the lower slope of Jezero Crater’s rim to offer up some of the oldest rocks on the Red Planet.
    NASA’s Perseverance Mars rover is exploring a new region of interest the team is calling “Krokodillen” that may contain some of the oldest rocks on Mars. The area has been on the Perseverance science team’s wish list because it marks an important boundary between the oldest rocks of Jezero Crater’s rim and those of the plains beyond the crater.
    “The last five months have been a geologic whirlwind,” said Ken Farley, deputy project scientist for Perseverance from Caltech in Pasadena. “As successful as our exploration of “Witch Hazel Hill” has been, our investigation of Krokodillen promises to be just as compelling.”
    Named by Perseverance mission scientists after a mountain ridge on the island of Prins Karls Forland, Norway, Krokodillen (which means “the crocodile” in Norwegian) is a 73-acre (about 30-hectare) plateau of rocky outcrops located downslope to the west and south of Witch Hazel Hill.
    A quick earlier investigation into the region revealed the presence of clays in this ancient bedrock. Because clays require liquid water to form, they provide important clues about the environment and habitability of early Mars. The detection of clays elsewhere within the Krokodillen region would reinforce the idea that abundant liquid water was present sometime in the distant past, likely before Jezero Crater was formed by the impact of an asteroid. Clay minerals are also known on Earth for preserving organic compounds, the building blocks of life.
    “If we find a potential biosignature here, it would most likely be from an entirely different and much earlier epoch of Mars evolution than the one we found last year in the crater with ‘Cheyava Falls,’” said Farley, referring to a rock sampled in July 2024 with chemical signatures and structures that could have been formed by life long ago. “The Krokodillen rocks formed before Jezero Crater was created, during Mars’ earliest geologic period, the Noachian, and are among the oldest rocks on Mars
    Data collected from NASA’s Mars orbiters suggest that the outer edges of Krokodillen may also have areas rich in olivine and carbonate. While olivine forms from magma, carbonate minerals on Earth typically form during a reaction in liquid water between rock and dissolved carbon dioxide. Carbonate minerals on Earth are known to be excellent preservers of fossilized ancient microbial life and recorders of ancient climate.
    The rover, which celebrated its 1,500th day of surface operations on May 9, is currently analyzing a rocky outcrop in Krokodillen called “Copper Cove” that may contain Noachian rocks.
    Ranking Mars Rocks
    The rover’s arrival at Krokodillen comes with a new sampling strategy for the nuclear-powered rover that allows for leaving some cored samples unsealed in case the mission finds a more scientifically compelling geologic feature down the road.
    To date, Perseverance has collected and sealed two regolith (crushed rock and dust) samples, three witness tubes, and one atmospheric sample. It has also collected 26 rock cores and sealed 25 of them. The rover’s one unsealed sample is its most recent, a rock core taken on April 28 that the team named “Bell Island,” which contains small round stones called spherules. If at some point the science team decides a new sample should take its place, the rover could be commanded to remove the tube from its bin in storage and dump the previous sample.
    “We have been exploring Mars for over four years, and every single filled sample tube we have on board has its own unique and compelling story to tell,” said Perseverance acting project scientist Katie Stack Morgan of NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Southern California. “There are seven empty sample tubes remaining and a lot of open road in front of us, so we’re going to keep a few tubes — including the one containing the Bell Island core — unsealed for now. This strategy allows us maximum flexibility as we continue our collection of diverse and compelling rock samples.”
    Before the mission adopted its new strategy, the engineering sample team assessed whether leaving a tube unsealed could diminish the quality of a sample. The answer was no.
    “The environment inside the rover met very strict standards for cleanliness when the rover was built. The tube is also oriented in such a way within its individual storage bin that the likelihood of extraneous material entering the tube during future activities, including sampling and drives, is very low,” said Stack Morgan.   
    In addition, the team assessed whether remnants of a sample that was dumped could “contaminate” a later sample. “Although there is a chance that any material remaining in the tube from the previous sample could come in contact with the outside of a new sample,” said Stack Morgan, “it is a very minor concern — and a worthwhile exchange for the opportunity to collect the best and most compelling samples when we find them.”
    News Media Contact
    DC AgleJet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif.818-393-9011agle@jpl.nasa.gov
    Karen Fox / Molly WasserNASA Headquarters, Washington202-358-1600karen.c.fox@nasa.gov / molly.l.wasser@nasa.gov  
    2025-071

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: CISA Welcomes Madhu Gottumukkala as the New Deputy Director

    News In Brief – Source: US Computer Emergency Readiness Team

    WASHINGTON – The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) is proud to announce the appointment of Madhu Gottumukkala as its new Deputy Director. In this role, he will help lead CISA’s mission to understand, manage, and reduce risk to the cyber and physical infrastructure that the American people rely on every day. 

    Prior to his appointment as the CISA Deputy Director, Dr. Gottumukkala served as Commissioner and Chief Information Officer for South Dakota’s Bureau of Information and Technology, overseeing statewide technology and cybersecurity initiatives. He assumed this role after serving as South Dakota’s second-ever chief technology officer, focused on innovation through the adoption of emerging technologies, while increasing efficiency by replacing outdated legacy systems.

    “I am honored to be appointed by Secretary Noem to serve as Deputy Director of CISA. As a former state and local leader, I have seen firsthand the exceptional work CISA does in advancing our nation’s cybersecurity and infrastructure resilience,” said Gottumukkala. “I look forward to building on that foundation by fostering collaboration and strengthening resilience across all levels of government and the private sector. Together, through trusted partnerships, transparency, and shared responsibility, we can better manage systemic risks and safeguard the critical functions that ensure our nation’s safety and prosperity.”

    “CISA is excited to welcome Madhu to the team. As we work around the clock to safeguard our nation’s most critical infrastructure, Madhu brings a unique blend of technical expertise and real-world experience that will enhance our mission,” said CISA Senior Official Performing the duties of the Director Bridget Bean. “His deep understanding of both the complexities and practical realities of infrastructure security will strengthen CISA in its role as the nation’s lead cyber defense agency and the national coordinator for infrastructure resilience today and into the future.”

    With over 24 years of experience in information technology (IT), Dr. Gottumukkala has held leadership roles spanning both the public and private sectors, including work across the wireless and telecom, unified communications, and health technology industries. He currently serves on the Advisory Committee of the College of Business and Information Systems at Dakota State University.

    Dr. Gottumukkala holds a Ph.D. in Information Systems from Dakota State University, an MBA in Engineering and Technology Management from the University of Dallas, an M.S. in Computer Science from the University of Texas at Arlington, and a B.E. in Electronics and Communication Engineering from Andhra University.

    For more information about CISA’s leadership team, please visit the official CISA website at CISA Leadership | CISA

    ###

    About CISA 

    As the nation’s cyber defense agency and national coordinator for critical infrastructure security, the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency leads the national effort to understand, manage, and reduce risk to the digital and physical infrastructure Americans rely on every hour of every day.

    Visit CISA.gov for more information and follow us on XFacebookLinkedIn, Instagram

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Webb Finds Icy Disk

    Source: NASA

    This artist’s concept illustration, released on May 14, 2025, shows a Sun-like star encircled by a disk of dusty debris containing crystalline water ice. Astronomers long expected that frozen water was scattered in systems around stars. By using detailed data known as spectra from NASA’s James Webb Space Telescope, researchers confirmed the presence of crystalline water ice — definitive evidence of what astronomers expected. Water ice is a vital ingredient in disks around young stars — it heavily influences the formation of giant planets and may also be delivered by small bodies like comets and asteroids to fully formed rocky planets.
    Read more about what this discovery means.
    Image credit: NASA, ESA, CSA, Ralf Crawford (STScI)

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Less Than 1 Week Left To Apply for FEMA Assistance Following February Severe Storms and Flooding

    Source: US Federal Emergency Management Agency

    Headline: Less Than 1 Week Left To Apply for FEMA Assistance Following February Severe Storms and Flooding

    Less Than 1 Week Left To Apply for FEMA Assistance Following February Severe Storms and Flooding

    FRANKFORT, Ky

    – Homeowners and renters in Breathitt, Clay, Estill, Floyd, Harlan, Johnson, Knott, Lee, Leslie, Letcher, Martin, Owsley, Perry, Pike, Simpson and Woodford counties who experienced damage or losses caused by the February severe storms and floods have less than 1 week to apply for federal disaster assistance

    The deadline to apply for federal assistance is May 25

      Survivors of the April storms still have until June 25 to Apply

    How To Apply for FEMA AssistanceThere are several ways to apply for FEMA assistance:Online at DisasterAssistance

    gov

    Visit any Disaster Recovery Center

    To find a center close to you, visit fema

    gov/DRC, or text DRC along with your Zip Code to 43362 (Example: “DRC 29169”)

    Use the FEMA mobile app

    Call the FEMA Helpline at 800-621-3362

    It is open 7 a

    m

    to 10 p

    m

    Eastern Time

    Help is available in many languages

    If you use a relay service, such as Video Relay Service (VRS), captioned telephone or other service, give FEMA your number for that service

    FEMA works with every household on a case-by-case basis

    FEMA representatives can explain available assistance programs, how to apply to FEMA, and help connect survivors with resources for their recovery needs

    When you apply, you will need to provide:A current phone number where you can be contacted

    Your address at the time of the disaster and the address where you are now staying

    Your Social Security Number

    A general list of damage and losses

    Banking information if you choose direct deposit

    If insured, the policy number or the agent and/or the company name

    Survivors should keep their contact information updated with FEMA as the agency may need to call to schedule a home inspection or get additional information

     Disaster assistance is not a substitute for insurance and is not intended to compensate for all losses caused by a disaster

    The assistance is intended to meet basic needs and supplement disaster recovery efforts

     Homeowners and renters in Woodford County may be eligible for federal assistance, if you had property damage or loss in Woodford County from the February severe incident, and then again from the April severe incident, you would need to complete two separate disaster assistance applications

    For an accessible video on how to apply for FEMA assistance, go to youtube

    com/watch?v=WZGpWI2RCNw

     For more information about Kentucky flooding recovery, visit www

    fema

    gov/disaster/4860

    Follow the FEMA Region 4 X account at x

    com/femaregion4

     
    martyce

    allenjr
    Mon, 05/19/2025 – 15:09

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: A Defining Era: NASA Stennis and Space Shuttle Main Engine Testing

    Source: NASA

    The numbers are notable – 34 years of testing space shuttle main engines at NASA’s Stennis Space Center near Bay St. Louis, Mississippi, 3,244 individual tests, more than 820,000 seconds (totaling more than nine days) of cumulative hot fire.
    The story behind the numbers is unforgettable.
    “It is hard to describe the full impact of the space shuttle main engine test campaign on NASA Stennis,” Center Director John Bailey said. “It is hundreds of stories, affecting all areas of center life, within one great story of team achievement and accomplishment.”
    NASA Stennis tested space shuttle main engines from May 19, 1975, to July 29, 2009. The testing made history, enabling 135 shuttle missions and notable space milestones, like deployment of the Hubble Space Telescope and construction of the International Space Station.
    The testing also:

    Established NASA Stennis as the center of excellence for large propulsion testing.
    Broadened and deepened the expertise of the NASA Stennis test team.
    Demonstrated and expanded the propulsion test capabilities of NASA Stennis.
    Ensured the future of the Mississippi site.

    NASA Stennis was not the immediate choice to test space shuttle main engines. Two other sites also sought the assignment – NASA’s Marshall Flight Center in Alabama and Edwards Air Force Base in California. However, following presentations and evaluations, NASA announced March 1, 1971, that the test campaign would take place in south Mississippi.
    “(NASA Stennis) was now assured of a future in propulsion testing for decades,” summarized Way Station to Space, a history of the center’s first decades.
    Testing did not begin immediately. First, NASA Stennis had to complete an ambitious project to convert stands built the previous decade for rocket stage testing to facilities supporting single-engine hot fire.
    Propellant run tanks were installed and calibrated. A system was fashioned to measure and verify engine thrust. A gimbaling capability was developed on the Fred Haise Test Stand to allow operators to move engines as they must pivot in flight to control rocket trajectory. Likewise, engineers designed a diffuser capability for the A-2 Test Stand to allow operators to test at simulated altitudes up to 60,000 feet.
    NASA Stennis teams also had to learn how to handle cryogenic propellants in a new way. For Apollo testing, propellants were loaded into stage tanks to support hot fires. For space shuttle, propellants had to be provided by the stand to the engine. New stand run tanks were not large enough to support a full-duration (500 seconds) hot fire, so teams had to provide real-time transfer of propellants from barges, to the run tanks, to the engine.
    The process required careful engineering and calibration. “There was a lot to learn to manage real-time operations,” said Maury Vander, chief of NASA Stennis test operations. “Teams had to develop a way to accurately measure propellant levels in the tanks and to control the flow from barges to the tanks and from the tanks to the engine. It is a very precise process.”

    The biggest challenge was operation of the engine itself. Not only was it the most sophisticated ever developed, but teams would be testing a full engine from the outset. Typically, individual components are developed and tested prior to assembling a full engine. Shuttle testing began on full-scale engines, although several initial tests did feature a trimmed down thrust chamber assembly.
    The initial test on May 19, 1975, provided an evaluation of team and engine. The so-called “burp” test did not feature full ignition, but it set the stage for moving forward.
    “The first test was a monstrous milestone,” Vander said. “Teams had to overcome all sorts of challenges, and I can only imagine what it must have felt like to go from a mostly theoretical engine to seeing it almost light. It is the kind of moment engineers love – fruits-of-all-your-hard-labor moment.”
    NASA Stennis teams conducted another five tests in quick succession. On June 23/24, with a complete engine thrust chamber assembly in place, teams achieved full ignition. By year’s end, teams had conducted 27 tests. In the next five years, they recorded more than 100 annual hot fires, a challenging pace. By the close of 1980, NASA Stennis had accumulated over 28 hours of hot fire.
    The learning curve remained steep as teams developed a defined engine start, power up, power down, and shutdown sequences. They also identified anomalies and experienced various engine failures.
    “Each test is a semi-controlled explosion,” Vander said. “And every test is like a work of art because of all that goes on behind the scenes to make it happen, and no two tests are exactly the same. There were a lot of knowledge and lessons learned that we continue to build on today.”

    Teams took a giant step forward in 1978 to 1981 with testing of the Main Propulsion Test Article, which involved installing three engines (configured as during an actual launch), with a space shuttle external tank and a mock orbiter, on the B-2 side of the Thad Cochran Test Stand.
    Teams conducted 18 tests of the article, proving conclusively that the shuttle configuration would fly as needed. On April 12, 1981, shuttle Columbia launched on the maiden STS-1 mission of the new era. Unlike previous vehicles, this one had no uncrewed test flight. The first launch of shuttle carried astronauts John Young and Bob Crippen.
    “The effort that you contributed made it possible for us to sit back and ride,” Crippen told NASA Stennis employees during a post-test visit to the site. “We couldn’t even make it look hard.”
    Testing proceeded steadily for the next 28 years. Engine anomalies, upgrades, system changes – all were tested at NASA Stennis. Limits of the engine were tested and proven. Site teams gained tremendous testing experience and expertise. NASA Stennis personnel became experts in handling cryogenics.
    Following the loss of shuttles Challenger and Columbia, NASA Stennis teams completed rigorous test campaigns to ensure future mission safety. The space shuttle main engine arguably became the most tested, and best understood, large rocket engine in the world – and NASA Stennis teams were among those at the forefront of knowledge.

    NASA recognized the effort of the NASA Stennis team, establishing the site as the center of excellence for large propulsion test work. In the meanwhile, NASA Stennis moved to solidify its future, growing as a federal city, home to more than 50 resident agencies, organizations, and companies.
    Shuttle testing opened the door for the variety of commercial aerospace test projects the site now supports. It also established and solidified the test team’s unique capabilities and gave all of Mississippi a sense of prideful ownership in the Space Shuttle Program – and its defining missions.
    No one can say what would have happened to NASA Stennis without the space shuttle main engine test campaign. However, everything NASA Stennis now is rests squarely on the record and work of that history-making campaign.
    “Everyone knows NASA Stennis as the site that tested the Apollo rockets that took humans to the Moon – but space shuttle main engine testing really built this site,” said Joe Schuyler, director of NASA Stennis engineering and test operations. “We are what we are because of that test campaign – and all that we become is built on that foundation.”

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Disaster Recovery Center Opens in Grayson County

    Source: US Federal Emergency Management Agency

    Headline: Disaster Recovery Center Opens in Grayson County

    Disaster Recovery Center Opens in Grayson County

    FRANKFORT, Ky

    –A Disaster Recovery Center has opened in Grayson County to offer in-person support to Kentucky survivors who experienced loss as the result of the April severe storms, straight-line winds, flooding, landslides and mudslides

    The new Disaster Recovery Center in Grayson County is located at: Fiscal Courthouse, 125 E

    White Oak St

    , Leitchfield, KY 42754 Working hours are 9 a

    m

    to 7 p

    m

    Central Time, Monday through Saturday and 1 – 7 p

    m

    Central Time, Sunday

    FEMA representatives can explain available assistance programs, how to apply to FEMA and help connect survivors with resources for their recovery needs

     FEMA is encouraging Kentuckians affected by the April storms to apply for federal disaster assistance as soon as possible

    The deadline to apply is June 25

    You can visit any Disaster Recovery Center to get in-person assistance

    No appointment is needed

    To find all other center locations, including those in other states, go to fema

    gov/drc or text “DRC” and a Zip Code to 43362

     You don’t have to visit a center to apply for FEMA assistance

    There are other ways to apply: online at DisasterAssistance

    gov, use the FEMA App for mobile devices or call 800-621-3362

    If you use a relay service, such as Video Relay Service (VRS), captioned telephone or other service, give FEMA the number for that service

    When you apply, you will need to provide:A current phone number where you can be contacted

    Your address at the time of the disaster and the address where you are now staying

    Your Social Security Number

    A general list of damage and losses

    Banking information if you choose direct deposit

    If insured, the policy number or the agent and/or the company name

    For more information about Kentucky flooding recovery, visit www

    fema

    gov/disaster/4860 and www

    fema

    gov/disaster/4864

    Follow the FEMA Region 4 X account at x

    com/femaregion4

    martyce

    allenjr
    Mon, 05/19/2025 – 13:13

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Disaster Recovery Center Opens in McLean County

    Source: US Federal Emergency Management Agency

    Headline: Disaster Recovery Center Opens in McLean County

    Disaster Recovery Center Opens in McLean County

    FRANKFORT, Ky

    –A Disaster Recovery Center has opened in McLean County to offer in-person support to Kentucky survivors who experienced loss as the result of the April severe storms, straight-line winds, flooding, landslides and mudslides

    The new Disaster Recovery Center in McLean County is located at: Calhoun Baptist Church, 315 Main St, Calhoun, KY 42327Working hours are 9 a

    m

    to 7 p

    m

    Central Time, Monday through Saturday and 1 – 7 p

    m

    Central Time, Sunday

    FEMA representatives can explain available assistance programs, how to apply to FEMA and help connect survivors with resources for their recovery needs

     FEMA is encouraging Kentuckians affected by the April storms to apply for federal disaster assistance as soon as possible

    The deadline to apply is June 25

    You can visit any Disaster Recovery Center to get in-person assistance

    No appointment is needed

    To find all other center locations, including those in other states, go to fema

    gov/drc or text “DRC” and a Zip Code to 43362

     You don’t have to visit a center to apply for FEMA assistance

    There are other ways to apply: online at DisasterAssistance

    gov, use the FEMA App for mobile devices or call 800-621-3362

    If you use a relay service, such as Video Relay Service (VRS), captioned telephone or other service, give FEMA the number for that service

    When you apply, you will need to provide:A current phone number where you can be contacted

    Your address at the time of the disaster and the address where you are now staying

    Your Social Security Number

    A general list of damage and losses

    Banking information if you choose direct deposit

    If insured, the policy number or the agent and/or the company name

    For more information about Kentucky flooding recovery, visit www

    fema

    gov/disaster/4860 and www

    fema

    gov/disaster/4864

    Follow the FEMA Region 4 X account at x

    com/femaregion4

    martyce

    allenjr
    Mon, 05/19/2025 – 13:35

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Disaster Recovery Center Opens in Jefferson County

    Source: US Federal Emergency Management Agency

    Headline: Disaster Recovery Center Opens in Jefferson County

    Disaster Recovery Center Opens in Jefferson County

    FRANKFORT, Ky

    –A Disaster Recovery Center has opened in Jefferson County to offer in-person support to Kentucky survivors who experienced loss as the result of the April severe storms, straight-line winds, flooding, landslides and mudslides

    The new Disaster Recovery Center in Jefferson County is located at: Council Chambers, 10416 Watterson Trail, Jeffersontown, KY 40299 Working hours are 9 a

    m

    to 7 p

    m

    Eastern Time, Monday through Saturday and 1 – 7 p

    m

    Eastern Time, Sunday

    FEMA representatives can explain available assistance programs, how to apply to FEMA and help connect survivors with resources for their recovery needs

     FEMA is encouraging Kentuckians affected by the April storms to apply for federal disaster assistance as soon as possible

    The deadline to apply is June 25

    You can visit any Disaster Recovery Center to get in-person assistance

    No appointment is needed

    To find all other center locations, including those in other states, go to fema

    gov/drc or text “DRC” and a Zip Code to 43362

     You don’t have to visit a center to apply for FEMA assistance

    There are other ways to apply: online at DisasterAssistance

    gov, use the FEMA App for mobile devices or call 800-621-3362

    If you use a relay service, such as Video Relay Service (VRS), captioned telephone or other service, give FEMA the number for that service

    When you apply, you will need to provide:A current phone number where you can be contacted

    Your address at the time of the disaster and the address where you are now staying

    Your Social Security Number

    A general list of damage and losses

    Banking information if you choose direct deposit

    If insured, the policy number or the agent and/or the company name

    For more information about Kentucky flooding recovery, visit www

    fema

    gov/disaster/4860 and www

    fema

    gov/disaster/4864

    Follow the FEMA Region 4 X account at x

    com/femaregion4

    martyce

    allenjr
    Mon, 05/19/2025 – 13:32

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Disaster Recovery Center Opens in Bullitt County

    Source: US Federal Emergency Management Agency

    Headline: Disaster Recovery Center Opens in Bullitt County

    Disaster Recovery Center Opens in Bullitt County

    FRANKFORT, Ky

    –A Disaster Recovery Center has opened in Bullitt County to offer in-person support to Kentucky survivors who experienced loss as the result of the April severe storms, straight-line winds, flooding, landslides and mudslides

    The new Disaster Recovery Center in Bullitt County is located at: Bullitt County Emergency Services, 238 Saltwell Road, Shepherdsville, KY 40165 Working hours are 9 a

    m

    to 7 p

    m

    Eastern Time, Monday through Saturday and 1 – 7 p

    m

    Eastern Time, Sunday

    FEMA representatives can explain available assistance programs, how to apply to FEMA, and help connect survivors with resources for their recovery needs

     FEMA is encouraging Kentuckians affected by the April storms to apply for federal disaster assistance as soon as possible

    The deadline to apply is June 25

    You can visit any Disaster Recovery Center to get in-person assistance

    No appointment is needed

    To find all other center locations, including those in other states, go to fema

    gov/drc or text “DRC” and a Zip Code to 43362

     You don’t have to visit a center to apply for FEMA assistance

    There are other ways to apply: online at DisasterAssistance

    gov, use the FEMA App for mobile devices or call 800-621-3362

    If you use a relay service, such as Video Relay Service (VRS), captioned telephone or other service, give FEMA the number for that service

    When you apply, you will need to provide:A current phone number where you can be contacted

    Your address at the time of the disaster and the address where you are now staying

    Your Social Security Number

    A general list of damage and losses

    Banking information if you choose direct deposit

    If insured, the policy number or the agent and/or the company name

    For more information about Kentucky flooding recovery, visit www

    fema

    gov/disaster/4860 and www

    fema

    gov/disaster/4864

    Follow the FEMA Region 4 X account at x

    com/femaregion4

    martyce

    allenjr
    Mon, 05/19/2025 – 13:06

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: First Partner joins conversation on expanding access to capital for female founders

    Source: US State of California 2

    May 19, 2025

    SACRAMENTO — First Partner Jennifer Siebel Newsom joined Marcie Frost (CEO, CalPERS) and Cassandra Lichnock (CEO, CalSTRS) at the annual Catalyst event for a candid conversation on the role California’s public institutions can play in opening access to funding for women and diverse entrepreneurs.

    California is now the fourth largest economy in the world and the center of the world’s investment-backed innovation economy, with Bay Area venture capitalists alone raising more than $151 billion in funds over the past five years— more than the rest of the U.S. combined. Yet, women and underrepresented voices are systematically overlooked: 

    • In 2023, women-founded companies raised $3.2 billion from VCs, just 2.8% of all U.S. VC activity. In comparison, all-male-founded companies raised $114 billion. (Pitchbook and Deloitte, Carta)
    • Women of color received just 0.39% of VC funding in 2023 and 0.13% of funding in 2022. (Fearless Fund)
    • Although the percentage of female VC check writers has grown from 9% to 15.5% in the U.S, 64% of venture firms still don’t have any female partners (female investors who are able to write checks). (All Raise)

    California is the global center of the innovation economy because we embrace new ways of thinking and fresh ideas. But if we’re missing out on more than half of the population’s entrepreneurial breakthroughs, we’re leaving a lot on the table. The current system doesn’t reflect a lack of talent. It reflects a lack of access and that’s something we must change. And it’s something we’re uniquely positioned to do here in California. Because we know that when women and diverse founders lead, they deliver results —not just for investors—but for entire communities.”

    First Partner Jennifer Siebel Newsom

    At the event, Siebel Newsom, Frost, and Lichnock also discussed how California is making strides to shift the structural conditions that limit economic opportunity for all: 

    • CalPERS has shifted private equity focus away from just large-scale managers to include mid-market, growth, and venture—segments viewed as “undercapitalized.” 33% of CalPERS-backed managers now qualify as “diverse,” compared to an industry average of 21% across eight peer public pension funds. 
    • SB 54, California’s Venture Capital Diversity Disclosure Law, which will require VC firms operating in California to disclose demographic data on funded founders to boost transparency.
    • SB 826, California’s first-in-the-nation “women on boards” law, although later challenged by the courts, this law helped boost the seats women held on California’s public company board to 30% — up from 15.5% in 2018.  
    • AB 2927, requires all high school students to take a personal finance course. It helps to ensure the next generation—especially girls from underserved communities—have the knowledge to build financial independence early.

    Through the First Partner’s work with California for all Women and her nonprofit the California Partners Project, she has championed efforts to help increase representation of women and close the gender wealth gap–including a board playbook series, co-created with Stanford’s VMware Women’s Leadership Innovation Lab and Stanford Graduate School of Business, to help companies boost talent and representation on boards. 

    “Women are the innovators and entrepreneurs that are helping solve societal issues yet remain significantly underrepresented in getting the capital they need to turn ideas into reality,” said Marcie Frost, CEO of CalPERS. Data shows businesses that are majority-owned by women only get 2-percent of venture capital investments in the United States. This gap highlights persistent systemic barriers and biases within the venture capital ecosystem, underscoring the need for more inclusive investment practices and equitable access to funding opportunities that align with our fiduciary duty and requirement to diversify assets.”

    Marcie Frost, CEO of CalPERS

    Research shows that women and diverse leaders deliver outsized results: 

    • Research from Boston Consulting Group indicates that women-owned startups can generate significantly more revenue per dollar invested, potentially leading to greater wealth for investors. 
    • Venture capital firms with more women investing partners outperform their peers—seeing 1.5% higher fund returns and nearly 10% more profitable exits. 

    First Partner, Press releases

    Recent news

    News What you need to know: California’s battery storage capacity now exceeds 15,700 megawatts, an unprecedented milestone that reflects the Newsom administration’s continued leadership in building the grid of the future. SACRAMENTO — California continues to rapidly…

    News What you need to know: The state is investing almost $1.7 billion for improvements to California’s highway system, including $86.5 million for improvements to infrastructure damaged during the Los Angeles firestorms earlier this year. SACRAMENTO – Governor Gavin…

    News SACRAMENTO – Governor Gavin Newsom kicked off #WorldTradeMonth with a round of key international interviews with journalists from major broadcast networks in Canada, Japan, Mexico, South Korea, and the United Kingdom. In the interviews, Governor Newsom addressed…

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Since Governor Newsom took office, California’s battery storage has increased 1,944% – and just achieved a major milestone

    Source: US State of California 2

    May 19, 2025

    What you need to know: California’s battery storage capacity now exceeds 15,700 megawatts, an unprecedented milestone that reflects the Newsom administration’s continued leadership in building the grid of the future.

    SACRAMENTO — California continues to rapidly expand its energy storage statewide, adding 2,300 megawatts (MW) since last September for a total of 15,763 MW of battery storage capacity, according to new data released today. This reflects a 1,944% increase since the start of the Newsom Administration – up from 770 MW in 2019. 

    Energy storage – particularly battery storage – has become a key resource in the state’s energy transformation. Battery systems capture power produced by wind and solar resources and discharge the energy back to the electric grid during times of peak demand – creating a safer and more reliable power grid.

    California is adding battery storage at a pace never seen before as we continue our work to build the grid of the future. The key to a cleaner, more reliable power grid is batteries – and no other jurisdiction on the planet, save China, comes even close to our rapid deployment.

    Governor Gavin Newsom

    On a smaller scale, tens of thousands of residential and commercial battery systems provide backup power and flexibility to homes, schools and businesses. They make up about 2,500 MW of total storage statewide, or about 16% of the battery storage total.

    The state projects that more than 48,000 MW of battery storage and 4,000 MW of long duration storage will be needed by 2045. Long duration energy storage systems are especially important, as they can provide up to 10 hours of power–more than double the four hours of power provided by traditional battery storage technology. 

    As California builds out the grid of the future, it is focusing efforts on proactively addressing safety for utility-scale battery storage systems through comprehensive state level collaborations and regulatory updates. Building battery storage is a critical part of the Governor’s build more, faster agenda delivering infrastructure upgrades and creating thousands of jobs across the state. 

    Governor Gavin Newsom recently convened a state-level collaborative to find opportunities to improve safety as the technology continues to evolve. Last month, the California Public Utilities Commission implemented new safety standards for battery storage facilities. Other key initiatives include an update to the California Fire Code happening this year, expected to include enhanced BESS safety standards. 

    California’s climate leadership

    Pollution is down and the economy is up. Greenhouse gas emissions in California are down 20% since 2000 – even as the state’s GDP increased 78% in that same time period.

    The state continues to set clean energy records. Last year, California ran on 100% clean electricity for the equivalent of 51 days – with the grid running on 100% clean energy for some period three out of every five days. 

    Press releases, Recent news

    Recent news

    News What you need to know: The state is investing almost $1.7 billion for improvements to California’s highway system, including $86.5 million for improvements to infrastructure damaged during the Los Angeles firestorms earlier this year. SACRAMENTO – Governor Gavin…

    News SACRAMENTO – Governor Gavin Newsom kicked off #WorldTradeMonth with a round of key international interviews with journalists from major broadcast networks in Canada, Japan, Mexico, South Korea, and the United Kingdom. In the interviews, Governor Newsom addressed…

    News Sacramento, California – Governor Gavin Newsom today issued a proclamation declaring May 2025 as “Small Business Month.”The text of the proclamation and a copy can be found below: PROCLAMATIONCalifornia’s more than 4.2 million small businesses – the most of any…

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Attorney General Bonta Co-Leads Comment Letter Opposing Federal Government’s Proposal to Significantly Weaken the Federal Endangered Species Act

    Source: US State of California

    OAKLAND – California Attorney General Rob Bonta today co-led a coalition of 16 attorneys general in sending a comment letter to the Trump Administration opposing a proposed rule by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service and the National Marine Fisheries Service (collectively, the Services) to rescind the regulatory definitions of “harm” under the federal Endangered Species Act (ESA). This change, if finalized, would significantly weaken the law’s ability to protect imperiled wildlife, especially from threats to the habitat upon which these species depend for their survival and recovery. This would include destroying breeding and feeding grounds, polluting or draining critical water sources, or degrading habitat, even if those actions lead to the death or injury of protected ESA-listed species. 

    “California is home to more than 300 species listed as threatened or endangered under the federal ESA, whose survival depends on the continued protection provided by the ESA,” said Attorney General Bonta. “Not only would the proposed rule put our ecosystems in critical danger, but the Trump Administration would be making this change illegally. My fellow attorneys general and I will continue to defend laws that protect endangered and threatened species and the preservation of biodiversity. Both humanity and the species with whom we share this planet depend on it.” 

    The ESA has been recognized as “the most comprehensive legislation for the preservation of endangered species ever enacted by any nation.” Enacted by Congress in 1973 with bipartisan support, the ESA provides a national program for the protection and recovery of endangered and threatened species and their habitats. Since then, the ESA has helped bring back several species from near-extinction, including the bald eagle, which is our national bird and an emblem of the nation, and the California condor. 

    In their letter, the attorneys general argue that the proposed rule from the Services, if finalized, will significantly reduce protections for vulnerable species and make it much harder to save such species from extinction, which is contrary to the plain language and purposes of the ESA, as well as longstanding Supreme Court precedent and other caselaw upholding the existing definitions. Not only is this proposed rule in violation of the ESA, but it also violates the Administrative Procedure Act and the National Environmental Policy Act. 

    California has millions of acres of lands that provide habitat for endangered and threatened species, and numerous local jurisdictions and private parties adhere to voluntary habitat conservation plans. These plans adjust land uses and development plans, and provide habitat protection and mitigation programs, to allow for reasonable economic development while avoiding, minimizing, and mitigating harm to listed species and their habitats. 

    California Attorney General Bonta co-led the letter with Massachusetts Attorney General Joy Campbell and Maryland Attorney General Anthony Brown. They were joined by the attorneys general of Arizona, Conneticut, Colorado, Illinois, Maine, Minnesota, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont and Washington.  

    A copy of the comment letter can be found here. 

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Secretary of the Commonwealth to Hold Primary Election Press Conference

    Source: US State of Pennsylvania

    May 20, 2025Harrisburg, PA

    ADVISORY – Secretary of the Commonwealth to Hold Primary Election Press Conference

    Secretary of the Commonwealth Al Schmidt will hold a press conference to provide an update on the administration of Pennsylvania’s primary election. A PACast with audio, video, and a press release will be available after the event.

    WHO: Al Schmidt, Secretary of the Commonwealth

    WHEN: TOMORROW, Tuesday, May 20 at 9:00 PM and 11:00 PM (if necessary)

    WHERE: Capitol Media Center (Media should enter at the rear of the Capitol behind the fountain. Press credentials are required.)

    RSVP: Press interested in attending should RSVP with the name of photographer/reporter to ra-st-press@pa.gov

    PUBLIC LIVESTREAM: pacast.com/live/dos

    SATELLITE COORDINATES:
    DATE: Tuesday, May 20, 2025
    TIME: 20:45 to 23:30 (Eastern)
    FORMAT: 16 x 9 HD
    SATELLITE: SES 02 (KU-Band – DIGITAL
    ORBITAL POSITION: 87 Degrees West
    TRANSPONDER: 15 [1]
    CHANNEL: B9 (9Mhz)
    SYM RATE: 6.333 msps
    FEC: 3/4
    BIT RATE: 8.754441
    VIDEO CODEC: MPEG-4 (H.264)
    DOWNLINK POL: Horizontal
    DOWNLINK FREQ: 11998.00 MHz
    MODULATION: DVB-S, QPSK
    TROUBLE: 717-772-4282

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Action Taken by Governor Phil Scott on Legislation – May 19, 2025

    Source: US State of Vermont

    Montpelier, Vt. – Governor Phil Scott announced action on the following bills, passed by the General Assembly.

    On May 19, Governor Scott signed bills of the following titles:

    • H.137, An act relating to the regulation of insurance products and services
    • H.491, An act relating to setting the homestead property tax yields and the nonhomestead property tax rate

    When signing H.491, Governor Scott issued the following statement:

    “After last year’s significant property tax increase, we knew it was important to provide Vermonters tax relief. But I want to be clear, buying down rates year after year isn’t good fiscal management and we should only view this as a bridge to the real education transformation our system needs. Before this session adjourns, it’s critical we work together to deliver an education bill that sets us on a path to a better more sustainable funding system, a more efficient and effective governance structure, and a commitment to doing the education quality work needed to make sure all students have access to educational opportunities, at a price Vermonters can afford.”

    To view a complete list of action on bills passed during the 2025 legislative session, click here.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Republican Budget Bill Threatens Health Coverage

    Source: US State of New York

    overnor Kathy Hochul today updated New Yorkers on the harmful effects of several healthcare provisions already passed from the House Ways & Means and Energy & Commerce committees for the Republican budget reconciliation bill. These provisions collectively amount to an annual loss of nearly $13.5 billion for New Yorkers and our healthcare sector, jeopardizing healthcare access for millions of New Yorkers while imperiling the state’s hospitals and other healthcare providers.

    “House Republicans are unrelenting in their pursuit to slash critical safety net programs like Medicaid that millions of New Yorkers rely on,” Governor Hochul said. “I’ll say it again, no one State can backfill these massive cuts – our Republican congressional members must speak out and push back to protect New Yorkers, now.”

    The provisions as currently written will lead to substantial changes in how the critical public insurance programs Medicaid and the Essential Plan are funded and administered across the state. According to the text of the bill language as passed by Ways & Means, more than half (50%) of Essential Plan funding — more than $7.5 billion — would be slashed, threatening the future of the program, and causing hundreds of thousands of New Yorkers to lose coverage. That same Ways & Means text would shift almost $3 billion of costs to the State, and result in billions of dollars in cuts to the State’s healthcare providers.

    In addition to the devastating financial losses to the Essential Plan, the text of the bill language as passed by Energy & Commerce requires states to impose stricter work reporting requirements and onerous verification processes for Medicaid, both of which will significantly increase the administrative burden of the program, thus making coverage more difficult to access. All told, the Republican bill would cause nearly 1.5 million New Yorkers to lose coverage and become uninsured. The Republican bill would also eliminate critical funding mechanisms long used to support our healthcare providers, place enormous strain on the health care system and trigger widespread impacts across local economies. The state anticipates an additional fiscal impact of more than $3 billion due to the Energy & Commerce language, including approximately $500 million in new administrative costs alone.

    View a congressional district-by-district breakdown on anticipated funding losses here.

    New York State Health Commissioner Dr. James McDonald said, “The proposed changes to federal health care funding would have serious consequences for New York State. Losing coverage for nearly 1.5 million New Yorkers would lead to significantly worse health outcomes for New Yorkers and would put immense strain on our health care system. We remain committed to working with all levels of government to protect access to quality, affordable care for all New Yorkers.”

    Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer said, ““This is as cruel and heartless as it gets. Trump and House Republicans want to kick 1.5 million New Yorkers off their health insurance and rip away $13.5 billion from NY’s hospitals and healthcare economy so they can have bigger tax breaks for billionaires & corporations. NY House Republicans promised for months they would protect Medicaid, but now New Yorkers know the truth: they never intended to keep that promise, and this confirms it. This isn’t targeting waste and fraud, this is a rushed plan to bankroll Trump’s tax breaks for the ultra-rich paid for by ripping away healthcare for New Yorkers. Hospitals and nursing homes will shutter, premiums will go up, families will suffer, and health care workers will lose their jobs. NY House Republicans need to stand up to Trump and stand up for New York, and stop the largest cut to healthcare in American history.”

    Senator Kirsten Gillibrand said, “This proposal would be catastrophic for the millions of Americans who rely on Medicaid. Republicans should be focused on bringing down the cost of essentials; instead, they are making health care harder to access and more expensive. They have proposed work requirements for Medicaid that ignore the fact that most Medicaid recipients already work, and would cost New York State an estimated $500 million to administer and enforce – all for minimal cost savings. The Republican bill puts kids at risk of losing health care through Medicaid and CHIP and puts the future of our state’s many rural hospitals in jeopardy. This is an unacceptable piece of legislation, and I will be doing everything in my power to stop it from passing.”

    House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries said, “Across our great state, millions rely on Medicaid for life-saving and life-sustaining healthcare coverage. Under the Republican plan, 1.5 million New Yorkers would lose their insurance, including over 60,000 residents of the Eighth Congressional District, as part of a toxic scheme to enact massive tax cuts for billionaires like Elon Musk. Nursing homes will close, hospitals will shut down and Community Health Centers will lose funding. It is time for House Republicans in New York to come up with the courage to stand up for their constituents and join with Democrats to prevent this devastating attack on the healthcare that New Yorkers depend on to survive.”

    Representative Jerrold Nadler said, “The House Republicans’ dangerous budget reconciliation bill would rip health care away from nearly 14 million Americans, including 1.5 million New Yorkers. Let’s be clear: this is an attack on the health care millions of families rely on, and it has nothing to do with fighting fraud, waste, or abuse. These cuts would fall hardest on children, women, seniors, and people with disabilities. It’s a shameful assault on the most vulnerable in our society, all to bankroll tax cuts for the ultra-wealthy. Every member of New York’s Congressional Delegation has a moral obligation to vote no on this devastating bill. To do anything less would be a callous betrayal of the New York families we represent.”

    Representative Nydia Velázquez said, “This is a calculated, partisan attack on New York by extremist Republicans who would rather dismantle public healthcare than ask billionaires to pay their fair share. Gutting the Essential Plan and subtracting $13.5 billion from the New York State economy is not sound policy; it is an assault on immigrants, workers, and underserved communities. These cuts will devastate safety net hospitals, strip coverage from over a million people, and punish states that remain committed to upholding their moral responsibility to provide care for all.”

    Representative Yvette D. Clarke said, “My Republican colleagues are so determined to gift tax breaks to their billionaire donors that they’ll strip healthcare from millions of Americans just to fund them. Let’s be clear: New Yorkers will lose their lives from the proposed cuts to Medicaid and other critical safety nets. Families won’t be able to afford to put food on the table, much less access the care they depend on to survive. For the safety and health of our communities and those across the nation, Congress has a moral responsibility to draw a line in the sand and not allow these cruel cuts to pass.”

    Representative Paul Tonko said, “I spent last week in Congress stating in the strongest possible terms my opposition to the Republicans’ budget betrayal and sharing the personal, devastating impacts these cuts would have on the communities and constituents I represent. New York State stands to lose billions of dollars in cuts to Medicaid from the reduced federal match, the provider tax provisions and more senseless provisions in this cruel package. Too many lives are at stake: I will continue to fight against this heartless budget with everything I’ve got.”

    Representative Grace Meng said, “As it stands, the GOP budget would threaten health care for hundreds of thousands of Queens residents in my district and the health care providers throughout New York that serve them. My Queens district has hundreds of thousands of Medicaid enrollees, many of which are children and seniors. Drastic cuts in federal funding will leave untold numbers without care and make it increasingly burdensome for local hospitals and community health centers to provide vital services. Health care is a basic need and the budgetary cuts the GOP is attempting to make will decimate our health care system in Queens and beyond.”

    Representative Adriano Espaillat said, “House Republicans remind us daily where their loyalties lie, even if it means supporting Donald Trump’s budget cuts that put millions of Americans at risk of becoming uninsured and hospitals in peril of losing critical funding to care for patients around the nation. The GOP’s attack on Medicaid harms more than 500,000 Medicaid recipients in my district, and I am doing all that it takes to combat these reckless policies that threaten our communities and health care throughout our state.”

    Representative Joe Morelle said, “President Trump’s plan to slash funding for Medicaid and the Essential Plan would take health care coverage away from thousands of Rochester residents, including vulnerable children and retirees. These reckless cuts would overwhelm emergency rooms with uncompensated care and devastate both our health care system and local economy. We cannot let this happen—I will continue fighting in Congress to protect these lifesaving programs.”

    Representative Dan Goldman said, “The Trump/Republican budget bill puts billionaires first and working-class Americans last. Every New York Republican in the House has voted to support the framework of a Republican budget that would strip away health care from nearly 14 million people, cut taxes for billionaires and raise taxes on working-class Americans, gut food benefits for the poor, maintain the Trump SALT cap, cancel clean energy projects, and increase the deficit by trillions of dollars. This bill is a betrayal of GOP campaign promises and the promise that the American Dream is accessible to everyone. New York Republicans must be held accountable for turning their backs on their own constituents.”

    Representative Tom Suozzi said, “The Reconciliation Budget bill will hit NY hospitals and nursing homes hard, while cutting health insurance for millions of Americans. These cuts will happen while giving unnecessary tax cuts to the wealthiest among us while adding $4 trillion to the deficit. I will keep up the fight for the health care New Yorkers deserve.”

    Representative Timothy M. Kennedy said, “Despite months of insisting they would not cut Medicaid, House Republicans are showing their true colors, eliminating critical social safety nets in order to force through a budget-busting tax break for billionaires. As families struggle to make ends meet, the House Republicans’ spending bill shows where their true priorities lie: helping the ultra-rich over their working-class constituents. Western New Yorkers cannot afford this anti-working family agenda.”

    Representative George Latimer said, “Everyday Americans will suffer if the Republicans’ budget becomes law. 196,000 people in my district will have their healthcare taken away – from children to seniors, and the disabled. I’m sure the state and hospitals will step in the best they can, but care will be much more expensive if these Medicaid cuts go into effect. For what? Tax breaks for billionaires. It’s unconscionable.”

    Representative Josh Riley said, “The House Republicans’ dangerous budget reconciliation bill would rip health care away from nearly 14 million Americans, including 1.5 million New Yorkers. Let’s be clear: this is an attack on the health care millions of families rely on, and it has nothing to do with fighting fraud, waste, or abuse. These cuts would fall hardest on children, women, seniors, and people with disabilities. It’s a shameful assault on the most vulnerable in our society, all to bankroll tax cuts for the ultra-wealthy. Every member of New York’s Congressional Delegation has a moral obligation to vote no on this devastating bill. To do anything less would be a callous betrayal of the New York families we represent.”

    Senate Majority Leader Andrea Stewart-Cousins said, “While House Republicans in Washington are advancing a budget that would devastate New York’s health care system—stripping coverage from 1.2 million New Yorkers and costing our state more than $11 billion annually—we are doing the opposite. In our state budget, we’ve expanded mental health services, restored funding to distressed hospitals, and invested in reproductive and primary care access. We are protecting people, not cutting them off. This federal proposal is not just reckless—it’s cruel. Every New Yorker should contact their member of Congress and demand they reject this dangerous plan. We can’t stand by while Washington plays politics with people’s lives.”

    Assembly Speaker Carl Heastie said, “This decision will devastate New Yorkers seeking healthcare and providers all across our state. It’s time for the Republican members of New York’s congressional delegation to stand up and stand against this decision that will harm their constituents directly.”

    Greater New York Hospital Association President Ken Raske said, “These proposals will strip health coverage from millions of hardworking individuals, drive up uncompensated care costs for financially struggling hospitals, and shift unsustainable costs to New York State. The Ways and Means Committee’s immigration coverage provision alone could cost our hospitals $1.3 billion per year from uncompensated care increases and lower reimbursement levels. This will harm all patients, not just those with Medicaid coverage. These proposals will wreck New York’s hospital system.”

    Hospital Association of New York State President Bea Grause said, “The House budget reconciliation bill threatens to shatter New York’s already fragile healthcare system. This perfect storm of a bill threatens our patients’ access to care, the jobs our healthcare system supports and the economies of our local communities. Washington should be advancing bills that ensure our hospitals, nursing homes and other providers are there when New Yorkers need them. This bill does the opposite. HANYS calls on every member of the New York Congressional delegation to vote no on this bill.”

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI: Best VPN 2025: NordVPN Tops VPN Service Providers Rankings

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Dallas, May 19, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) —

    NordVPN has emerged as one of the best VPN services in the US, widely recognized for its strong security features, fast connection speeds, and user-friendly interface. This major accolade comes as more and more people seek to encrypt their internet traffic for enhanced security and privacy.

    CLICK HERE TO GET THE BEST VPN 2025: NORDVPN

    “For most people in the US and across the globe, the internet isn’t a luxury anymore but part of everyday life. From shopping online to learning new things or paying bills, the internet has become a necessity. Therefore, it has become more important than ever for NordVPN to keep connections private and secure.”

    First and foremost, NordVPN sets the standard by incorporating a clean and easy-to-use user interface. Whether a seasoned user or a beginner, users can easily get started and choose their pricing plans without help. This look and feel is maintained across all platforms, including Windows, macOS, iOS, and Linux. End users with direct experience have described the platform as clear and visually engaging in a simple way that doesn’t compromise functionality.

    CLICK HERE TO GET THE BEST VPN 2025: NORDVPN

    Users can easily connect to the fastest and most secure server by clicking on Quick Connect. A comprehensive list of servers can be filtered based on specialty, such as P2P or double VPN. Moreover, users can view clear real-time indicators of their connection status.

    Moreover, it is easy for beginners to get started. Users can configure their VPNs to connect automatically or manually. Automatic connections enable users to be protected all the time, while manual connections enable connections depending on needs. When it comes to pricing, NordVPN has worked out plans that suit users with different budgets. With each plan, users can connect up to 10 devices simultaneously. Here is a guide.

    • Choose a subscription plan.
    • Create your account.
    • Select a payment method to complete your purchase.
    • Sign in to NordVPN to access your virtual private network.

    NordVPN stands out from its competitors when it comes to security. The VPN provider takes your online security to the next level by offering a double VPN. This routes your traffic through two servers, which adds an extra layer of encryption to the user’s online activity — a feature few VPNs offer. Other features that provide robust defense against malware, trackers, and data leaks include Threat Protection and Dark Web Monitoring. These two features prevent users from downloading malware while blocking trackers and ads. Users can rest assured that their accounts are safe by activating the Dark Web Monitor. In case of any password and data leaks, the user will be informed to take the necessary action.

    “In a time when digital threats are evolving faster than ever, NordVPN continues to set the gold standard in online security. From RAM-only servers to next-generation encryption and independent audits, everything we do is built on trust — because our users deserve complete privacy without compromise.”

    Additionally, NordVPN’s advanced features show its unwavering commitment to online privacy. For instance, users have access to encrypted cloud storage, which allows them to encrypt their files and back them up in secure cloud storage. Another notable example is NordProtect. This free feature is available to US users only and protects them from identity theft by monitoring a user’s account, credit card activity, and credit score. Other premium services include password managers and secure remote file access.

    Regarding infrastructure, NordVPN stands at the forefront. The provider has significantly invested in expanding and optimizing its server network, ensuring high-quality performance and broad accessibility. This robust infrastructure is crucial, as it directly impacts the VPN’s coverage, speed, and reliability for users worldwide. NordVPN has more than 7,600 VPN servers spread across 118 locations.

    Of these, 25% are spread across the US in 16 locations. Additionally, NordVPN has integrated advanced server technology to maximize speed and security. For instance, NordVPN has leveraged RAM-only servers that ensure data is wiped out whenever the server restarts. Additionally, open-source protocols such as the WireGuard-poweredNordLynx protocol are integrated to enable the highest level of encryption.

    The speed of any VPN is critical — even with the best security features, low speeds could greatly affect usability. NordVPN has dedicated efforts towards high speeds to improve the quality and speed of connection. Through their server infrastructure, NordVPN delivers impressive connection speeds. Users in the USA enjoy the highest speeds of up to 2964 mb/s. In addition, using lightweight protocols comes in handy for speed. SmartPlay technology has enhanced security and privacy without compromising on speed for gamers and live streamers.

    NordVPN has poured resources into ensuring a flawless experience from purchasing plans to connectivity. However, in case of any hitches, the platform has reliable customer support. The team is available around the clock and offers prompt and knowledgeable responses. Users can access the team through the live chat feature. Several site blog guides teach how to troubleshoot any app or connection issues. As a top-ranking VPN provider, this is evidence enough that NordVPN goes above and beyond to ensure customer satisfaction.

    NordVPN’s rise to the top is due to its commitment to privacy and freedom to decide what users share. This has been delivered perfectly by incorporating the latest advanced technology.

    NordVPN Support:

    Disclaimer and Disclosure Notice

    The information provided in this article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice, financial guidance, or an endorsement of any specific product or service. While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the content at the time of publication, no guarantees are made regarding its completeness, timeliness, or relevance. The publisher, the author, and any affiliated syndication partners disclaim any liability for any errors or omissions, including but not limited to typographical or factual inaccuracies that may be present.

    This article may contain references to third-party products and services. Any product claims, statistics, quotes, or other representations should be verified with the manufacturer, provider, or party in question. Readers are encouraged to perform their own due diligence before making any purchase or relying on the content in any capacity.

    Some links within this article may be affiliate links. This means the publisher or author may earn a commission if a reader clicks through and makes a purchase, at no additional cost to the reader. Such commissions help support the production and distribution of content but do not influence the editorial integrity or recommendations presented.

    All parties involved in the creation, distribution, and promotion of this article — including syndication partners — are held harmless from any liability arising directly or indirectly from the use or misuse of the information herein. Inclusion of product references does not constitute a formal endorsement by the publisher or its affiliates.

    Use of the information in this article is strictly at the reader’s own risk.

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI Video: Laredo, Texas, worksite operation

    Source: United States of America – Federal Government Departments (video statements)

    LAREDO, Texas — During a one-day worksite operation, ICE Laredo made 31 arrests. We discovered several of the aliens had previous convictions.

    Our records check uncovered offenses including:

    Aggravated sexual assault

    Human smuggling

    Terroristic threats against family/household members

    Weapons in a weapons-free zone

    Domestic violence

    Strangulation

    Employers who hire illegal workers put other employees and our communities at risk.

    Report worksite noncompliance: 866-DHS-2-ICE

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9GZ2wOLJktQ

    MIL OSI Video

  • MIL-OSI Video: Negotiated Rulemaking Public Hearing Afternoon Session April 28, 2025

    Source: United States of America – Federal Government Departments (video statements)

    This public hearing is part of the Department of Education’s negotiated rulemaking for 2025-2026 to make regulatory changes for the programs authorized by Title IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1gtLavFitMI

    MIL OSI Video

  • MIL-OSI Video: Negotiated Rulemaking Public Hearing Morning Session April 28, 2025

    Source: United States of America – Federal Government Departments (video statements)

    This public hearing is part of the Department of Education’s negotiated rulemaking for 2025-2026 to make regulatory changes for the programs authorized by Title IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z51nJdJbGgk

    MIL OSI Video

  • MIL-OSI Video: Negotiated Rulemaking Public Hearing Morning Session April 30, 2025

    Source: United States of America – Federal Government Departments (video statements)

    This public hearing is part of the Department of Education’s negotiated rulemaking for 2025-2026 to make regulatory changes for the programs authorized by Title IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KXSfd_wbPOE

    MIL OSI Video

  • MIL-OSI Video: Negotiated Rulemaking Public Hearing Afternoon Session April 30, 2025

    Source: United States of America – Federal Government Departments (video statements)

    This public hearing is part of the Department of Education’s negotiated rulemaking for 2025-2026 to make regulatory changes for the programs authorized by Title IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8iqogAfZrpA

    MIL OSI Video

  • MIL-OSI Video: Breast Cancer Screening for Women Veterans

    Source: United States of America – Federal Government Departments (video statements)

    VA offers screening mammograms to women Veterans, helping detect breast cancer early—when it’s most treatable. Mammograms are available on-site at more than 70 VA medical centers across the country. If you receive care at a facility without on-site services, VA will connect you with a nearby community provider.

    Have mobility challenges or difficulty standing? VA uses state-of-the-art, accessible equipment to ensure every woman Veteran can get the screenings she needs.

    The SERVICE Act also expands eligibility—if you deployed to certain locations during specific time frames, you may qualify for a breast cancer risk evaluation and mammogram when clinically appropriate.

    To learn more, watch this video or call the Women Veterans Call Center at 1-855-VA-WOMEN (1-855-829-6636).

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QjFttDTgJ4Y

    MIL OSI Video

  • MIL-OSI USA: Reconciliation Recommendations of the House Committee on Natural Resources

    Source: US Congressional Budget Office

    Legislation Summary

    H. Con. Res. 14, the Concurrent Resolution on the Budget for Fiscal Year 2025, instructed the House Committee on Natural Resources to recommend legislative changes that would decrease deficits by not less than a specified amount over the 2025-2034 period. As part of the reconciliation process, the House Committee on Natural Resources approved legislation on May 6, 2025, with provisions that would decrease deficits.

    Estimated Federal Cost

    In CBO’s estimation, the reconciliation recommendations of the House Committee on Natural Resources would, on net, decrease deficits by $20.2 billionover the 2025-2034 period. The estimated budgetary effects of the legislation are shown in Table 1. The costs of the legislation fall within budget functions 300 (natural resources and environment) and 950 (undistributed offsetting receipts).

    Return to Reference

    Table 1.

    Estimated Budgetary Effects of Reconciliation Recommendations Title VIII, House Committee on Natural Resources, as Ordered Reported on May 6, 2025

     

    By Fiscal Year, Millions of Dollars

       
     

    2025

    2026

    2027

    2028

    2029

    2030

    2031

    2032

    2033

    2034

    2025-2029

    2025-2034

     

    Increases or Decreases (-) in Direct Spending

       

    Budget Authority

    2,018

    -575

    -835

    -1,722

    -1,748

    -2,437

    -2,698

    -3,146

    -3,835

    -4,355

    -2,862

    -19,333

    Estimated Outlays

    -122

    -521

    -659

    -1,523

    -1,504

    -2,224

    -2,254

    -2,693

    -3,377

    -4,096

    -4,329

    -18,973

     

    Increases in Revenues

       

    Estimated Revenues

    0

    65

    130

    130

    135

    140

    140

    145

    150

    150

    460

    1,185

     

    Net Decrease in the Deficit

    From Changes in Direct Spending and Revenues

       

    Effect on the Deficit

    -122

    -586

    -789

    -1,653

    -1,639

    -2,364

    -2,394

    -2,838

    -3,527

    -4,246

    -4,789

    -20,158

    Basis of Estimate

    For this estimate, CBO assumes that the legislation will be enacted in summer 2025. CBO’s estimates are relative to its January 2025 baseline and cover the period from 2025 through 2034. Outlays of directly appropriated amounts were estimated using historical obligation and spending rates for similar programs.

    CBO expects that the share of bonus bids, rents, and royalties from onshore oil, gas, coal, and renewable-energy production paid to states and counties would be subject to sequestration under the Budget Control Act of 2011. CBO estimates that a portion of those payments would be sequestered in each year, starting in 2027 and ending in 2032. However, in every subsequent year, starting in 2028 and ending in 2033, those amounts would be restored, resulting in a net zero budgetary effect over the 2025‑2034 period. CBO includes those effects in its estimates for sections 80101, 80111, 80121, 80122, 80141, 80144, 80181, 80301, 80303, 80304, and 80305.

    Direct Spending

    CBO estimates that enacting the legislation would decrease direct spending outlays by $19.0 billion over the 2025-2034 period (see Table 2).

    Subtitle A. Energy and Mineral Resources

    Subtitle A would require new lease sales on federal land for onshore and offshore oil and gas, coal, and renewable energy and would change permitting processes. CBO estimates that enacting the subtitle would decrease direct spending by $19.7 billion over the 2025-2034 period.

    Federally owned energy resources are developed under a leasing system that requires companies to bid on tracts of land. Winning bidders remit payments called bonus bids when leases are issued; pay annual rent on nonproducing leases; and pay royalties on the value of any oil, gas, coal, or electricity produced from the leased land. Those payments are recorded in the budget as offsetting receipts—that is, as reductions in direct spending. Unless otherwise noted, those fees are deposited in the Treasury.

    Part I. Oil and Gas

    Sections 80101 through 80105 would increase the minimum number of oil and gas lease sales required each year, reinstate noncompetitive oil and gas lease sales, establish permitting by rule for oil and gas drilling, expand the practice of commingling oil and gas production, and reduce royalty rates for new onshore oil and gas leases from 16.67 percent to 12.5 percent. Those sections interact and CBO has shown the estimates of their combined budgetary effects under section 80101.

    Onshore Oil and Gas Leasing Sales. Section 80101 would require the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) to conduct at least four onshore oil and gas lease sales each year in specified states where land is available for oil and gas development under the Mineral Leasing Act. Under current law, the Department of the Interior (DOI) has discretion to postpone or cancel oil and gas lease sales; the section would require BLM to conduct a replacement sale if a sale is canceled. CBO estimates that the resulting number of onshore oil and gas leases would increase by 1,300 annually, on average, over the 2025-2034 period.

    CBO estimates that the interactive effects of enacting this section and sections 80102 through 80105, discussed below, would increase offsetting receipts from bonus bids, rents, and royalties by $12.8 billion, on net, over the 2026-2034 period, after adjusting for the effects of sequestration.

    Noncompetitive Leasing. Section 80102 would reinstate BLM’s authority, rescinded by the 2022 reconciliation act, to award federal land for oil and gas development in noncompetitive leases if no successful bids are made in a competitive sale. Using data from the agency, CBO estimates that enacting the section would increase onshore oil and gas leasing by 150 to 180 leases each year, thus increasing oil and gas production and related collections of royalties over the 2025‑2034 period. This provision interacts with other sections and CBO has shown the estimated budgetary effects under section 80101.

    Permit Fees. Section 80103 would direct DOI to approve applications that allow operators to commingle onshore oil and gas production from multiple sources within a single well. Operators would be required to pay a $10,000 fee and install volume-measuring equipment to ensure appropriate oil and gas allocation and royalty payments. BLM currently allows onshore operators to commingle production under certain conditions; enacting this provision would expand that practice.

    Information from industry sources and BLM indicates that commingling can produce larger yields over shorter periods than is likely with permitting and drilling separate wells. CBO estimates that under this provision DOI would approve an average of 1,000 applications annually over the 2025‑2034 period; thus, royalty collections would increase relative to current law.

    Within two years of enactment, section 80103 also would require DOI to establish a permit-by-rule program. Under the program, leaseholders would purchase permits (at a cost of $5,000) allowing them to notify a permitting authority of their compliance with certain rules. That process would shorten the time to begin oil and gas development.

    Using information from industry sources and BLM, CBO estimates that under this provision, DOI would receive more than 3,000 applications annually over the 2025-2034 period. We expect that oil and gas production would accelerate by about 200 days, on average, increasing royalty payments relative to current law. CBO further expects that under section 80103, future leased parcels would become more valuable, increasing future bonus bids for onshore leases. This provision interacts with other sections and CBO has shown the estimated budgetary effects under section 80101.

    Permitting Fee for Non-Federal Land. Section 80104 would prohibit DOI from requiring permits to drill for oil and gas leases under certain conditions, including drilling in places where the federal government owns less than 50 percent of the minerals or does not own the surface of the drilling area. Operators would be required to pay a $5,000 fee for each lease. Using information from the agency, CBO estimates that fewer than 200 such cases would occur each year over the 2025-2034 period. CBO estimates that oil and gas production would accelerate by about a year in those cases, increasing royalties paid to the federal government. This provision interacts with other sections and CBO has shown the estimated budgetary effects under section 80101.

    Reinstate Reasonable Royalty Rates. Section 80105 would reinstate a royalty rate of 12.5 percent for new onshore oil and gas leases. The 2022 reconciliation act set the royalty rate at 16.67 percent. (The legislation would not affect the royalty rate for outstanding leases.) CBO expects that one effect of lowering the rate would be to reduce royalty receipts from new lease sales that CBO projects would occur under current law. CBO also expects that lowering the rate would increase oil and gas production on those sites, because of the potential for increased profits for operators and leaseholders, thus increasing royalty collections. In addition, CBO expects that future leased parcels would become more valuable, thus raising future bonus bids on onshore leases. This provision interacts with other sections and CBO has shown the estimated budgetary effects under section 80101.

    Under current law, through August 2032 the royalty rates for offshore oil and gas leases must be between 16.67 percent and 18.75 percent, and at least 16.67 percent after that. This provision would permanently set the rate between 12.5 percent and 18.75 percent. Based on royalty rates for recent oil and gas leasing, CBO expects that the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) would continue to impose a rate of 18.75 percent; on that basis, CBO expects that the legislation would not affect the royalty rate for future offshore oil and gas leases.

    Part II. Geothermal

    Sections 80111 and 80112 would require annual geothermal lease sales and exclude power plants outside of the leasing area from paying royalties on geothermal resources used by those plants. The two sections interact and CBO has shown the estimates of their combined budgetary effects under section 80111.

    Geothermal Leasing. Section 80111 would require DOI to hold annual geothermal lease sales and replace canceled or delayed sales within the same year. Sales would include parcels in each state that are eligible for geothermal development under the Federal Land and Management Act of 1976. Under current law, DOI holds geothermal lease sales every other year. Winning bidders remit bonus bids as leases are issued and they pay annual rent on nonproducing leases and royalties on the value of any electricity produced and sold from the leased land. Geothermal projects on federal land take between seven and nine years from leasing to electricity production, depending on permitting, exploration results, and financial resources.

    Using information from the industry and data from BLM, CBO estimates that under the legislation DOI would issue about 450 new leases through 2034. CBO estimates that, after sharing a portion of those receipts with states and counties where the activities occur, the legislation would increase net offsetting receipts by $23 million from bonus bids, rents, and royalties over the 2025-2034 period, after adjusting for sequestration.

    Geothermal Royalties. Section 80112 would exclude from royalty payments federal geothermal resources that support power plants located outside the boundaries of the federal geothermal leasing area. Under current law, using geothermal resources within or outside an area does not exempt lessees from paying royalties. Using data from BLM, CBO estimates that more than half of all power plants that access federal geothermal resources would be excluded from paying royalties under this provision, decreasing royalty payments under new leases.

    Part III. Alaska

    Part III would reinstate the Coastal Plain Oil and Gas Leasing Program and require new lease sales in the National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska.

    Coastal Plain Oil and Gas Leasing. Section 80121 would require BLM to reinstate six leases canceled after the 2021 lease sale. CBO expects that the lessees would repay the $8 million for bonus bids they received in reimbursements after the cancellation and that they would pay rent totaling $3 million a year until production begins.

    This provision also would require BLM to conduct at least four oil and gas lease sales in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge within 10 years of enactment. BLM would be required to offer a minimum of 400,000 acres in each sale, or the total number of unleased acres available at the time of a sale. The legislation would require those sales to be conducted under terms established by the “Record of Decision for the Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Coastal Plain Oil and Gas Leasing Program, Alaska,” dated August 21, 2020.

    Section 80121 also would require BLM to issue any rights-of-way, easements, permits, or other necessary authorizations for the exploration, development, production, and transportation of oil and gas under those leases. Those authorizations would be considered to satisfy all federal laws, including the Alaska National Interest Lands Act, Endangered Species Act, and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), and they would be exempted from judicial review. CBO expects that enacting those provisions would significantly increase the likelihood that companies would participate in each sale and the amount that companies would bid in those sales.

    Using information from BLM, the U.S. Geological Survey, and industry experts, CBO estimates that the reinstated and new leases awarded under the legislation would increase net offsetting receipts to the federal government by $946 million from bonus bids, rents, and royalties over the 2025-2034 period, after adjusting for sequestration. That amount is adjusted for sequestration and incorporates the 50 percent that would be paid to Alaska under current law.

    Estimates of bonus bids, rents, and royalties from leases in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge are uncertain. Potential bidders might make assumptions that are different from CBO’s, including assumptions about long-term oil prices, production costs, the amount of oil and gas resources in the area, production timelines, and alternative investment opportunities. The number of factors that affect companies’ investment and operation decisions result in wide ranges for bonus bids, rents, and royalties. CBO’s estimate represents the midpoint of those ranges.

    National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska. Section 80122 would direct DOI to resume the oil and gas leasing program under the Naval Petroleum Reserves Production Act of 1976, requiring a lease sale within one year of enactment, and every two years thereafter. Under regulations issued in 2020, BLM would offer a minimum of 4 million acres in each sale. The legislation would deem all sales to meet environmental requirements established in NEPA.

    Using information from BLM, the U.S. Geological Survey, and industry groups, CBO estimates that bonus bids, rents, and royalties from the reinstated and new leases would increase net offsetting receipts by $532 million over the 2025‑2034 period, after adjusting for sequestration. That amount is adjusted for sequestration and incorporates the 50 percent that would be paid to Alaska under current law.

    Part IV. Mining

    Part IV would reinstate mining leases in national forest land in the state of Minnesota and require the necessary approvals and permits for a new road in Alaska.

    Superior National Forest Lands in Minnesota. Section 80131 would rescind an order issued by BLM in 2023 that was effective for a period of 20 years and subject to valid existing rights. That order withdrew more than 225,000 acres of National Forest System land in Minnesota from mineral and geothermal leasing. This provision would require the Departments of Agriculture and the Interior to reissue all mineral leases for a 20-year term with an option for renewal. The remaining terms of the reinstated leases would be as they were originally and the leases would be exempt from judicial review.

    Using information from BLM on the leases’ terms, CBO expects that leaseholders would pay combined annual rent and minimum royalties of about $400,000 and would pay a 6 percent royalty on the gross value of minerals mined. Based on information from the industry, CBO expects that state and local permitting and preproduction activities would take about seven years to complete. Because of uncertainty about when and whether leaseholders would obtain the necessary state permits, CBO used a 50 percent probability that production would begin after 2031 but before 2034. On that basis, CBO estimates that the federal government would collect $81 million in rents and royalties over the 2025-2034 period.

    Ambler Road in Alaska. Section 80132 would require federal approval for rights-of-way, permits, licenses, leases, and any other authorizations needed to access public land for the construction of the Ambler Road across the western unit of the Gates of the Arctic National Preserve and the Central Yukon Planning Area in Alaska. All authorizations would be granted under the 2020 Ambler Road Environmental Impact Statement and would be exempt from judicial review. This provision also would establish an annual rent of $500,000 from 2025 through 2034. CBO estimates that enacting the provision would reduce direct spending by $4 million over the 2025-2034 period.

    Part V. Coal

    Part V would require DOI to rescind the temporary pause on coal leasing and reduce the royalty rate on existing and new coal leases. Sections 80141 through 80143 interact and CBO has shown the estimates of their combined budgetary effects under section 80141.

    Coal Leasing. Section 80141 would direct DOI to process and approve qualified applications for coal leases and provide any necessary approvals for mining. The legislation also would require DOI to make available a minimum of 4 million additional acres with known recoverable coal reserves in the lower 48 states and Alaska. That requirement would exclude national parks and monuments as well as historic, wilderness, recreational, and conservation areas. After adjusting for the effects of sequestration, CBO estimates that the bonus bids, rents, and royalties would increase offsetting receipts by $237 million over the 2025‑2034 period.

    Future Coal Leasing. Section 80142 would rescind a 2016 Secretarial Order from DOI that paused the issuance of new federal leases for thermal coal. This provision interacts with section 80141 and CBO has shown the estimated budgetary effects under that section.

    Coal Royalty. Section 80143 would reduce the royalty rate on federal coal leases from 12.5 percent to 7 percent. That rate would apply to existing and new leases from the date of enactment through September 30, 2034. CBO estimates that the reduction would increase direct spending during the same period by reducing offsetting receipts. This section interacts with section 80141 and CBO has shown the estimated budgetary effects under that section.

    Authorization to Mine Federal Minerals. Section 80144 would authorize the mining of all coal reserves under certain federal coal leases previously issued for about 800 acres in Montana. Mining authorizations would be provided in accordance with a 2020 mining plan modification. Using information from BLM, CBO estimates that enacting the provision would increase net royalties by $42 million in the 2025‑2034 period, after sharing 50 percent of the total receipts with the state of Montana. The estimate is adjusted for the effects of sequestration.

    Part VI. NEPA

    Part VI would authorize sponsors of projects that require environmental assessments or environmental impact statements under NEPA to pay a fee to potentially expedite completion of the assessments or statements and for exemption from judicial review.

    Project Sponsor Opt-In Fees for Environmental Reviews. Section 80151 would authorize sponsors of projects that require environmental assessments or environmental impact statements under NEPA to pay a fee for a potentially expedited completion of the assessment or statement and for exemption from judicial review. The fee would be set at 125 percent of the anticipated costs to prepare or supervise the preparation of the assessment or statement.

    CBO expects that the exemption from judicial review would accelerate the start date of some large, federally funded transportation, energy, and infrastructure projects that otherwise would have been delayed by litigation. Based on NEPA litigation data and factoring in the chance that projects would be delayed by other litigation (for example, challenges under the Endangered Species Act), CBO anticipates that enacting section 80151 would accelerate those projects by about two years. We also expect that some federally funded projects that would have been permanently stopped by a challenge under current law would commence under this provision. CBO estimates that accelerating or starting those formerly delayed or stopped projects would increase direct spending by $190 million over the 2025-2034 period. (CBO expects that federal funds for those projects would have been spent more slowly or would not have been spent at all, under current law.)

    Finally, CBO expects that enacting section 80151 would accelerate the start of some energy projects on federal land, increasing the collection of rents and royalties over the 2025-2034 period. Those effects are included as interactive effects in other sections.

    Rescission Relating to Environmental and Climate Data Collection. Section 80152 would rescind the unobligated balances of funds directly appropriated in the 2022 reconciliation act to the Council on Environmental Quality. Using information from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), CBO estimates that enacting this provision would decrease direct spending by $25 million over the 2025-2034 period.

    Part VII. Miscellaneous

    Part VII would require a fee for the filing of protests against oil and gas lease sales. The receipts collected under the provision would reduce direct spending.

    Protest Fees. Section 80161 would establish filing fees to submit protests against oil and gas lease sales; the fees would depend on the number of pages and protests in each filing. Using data from BLM on protests and the estimated increases in oil and gas leasing under the legislation, CBO estimates that enacting the provision would increase offsetting receipts by $5 million over the 2025-2034 period.

    Part VIII. Offshore Oil and Gas Leasing

    Part VIII would require new sales of offshore oil and gas leases, authorize the commingling of offshore oil production from multiple reservoirs within a single well under certain conditions, and increase the amount of energy receipts that may be distributed to states and conservation programs. Sections 80171 and 80172 interact and CBO has shown the combined estimates of their budgetary effects under section 80171.

    Mandatory Offshore Oil and Gas Lease Sales. Section 80171 would require BOEM to hold at least 30 lease sales in the Gulf of America during the 15 years after enactment and 6 lease sales in Alaska’s Cook Inlet during the 10 years after enactment. Those sales would be held annually according to a schedule described in the legislation.

    In September 2023, BOEM released its five-year plan for holding Outer Continental Shelf oil and gas lease sales during the 2024-2029 period. The Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act requires BOEM to issue leasing schedules; any significant revisions require a process for consultation and rulemaking. Under the current five-year plan, the agency intends to hold two more sales in the gulf: one each in 2027 and 2029. The plan does not include sales in the Alaska Outer Continental Shelf. The legislation would authorize BOEM to hold the new sales in addition to those in the five-year plan.

    CBO expects that, under the legislation, BOEM would hold 24 additional offshore oil and gas sales by the end of 2034: 18 in the gulf and 6 in the Cook Inlet. Because planning and executing a lease sale takes between six months and two years, CBO expects that the sale that the legislation would require before August 15, 2025, would occur in a later year. CBO estimates that new offshore lease sales would generate $6.3 billion in bonus bids, rents, and royalties over the 2026-2034 period. That estimate includes the effects of enacting section 80172.

    Offshore Commingling. Section 80172 would require DOI to approve operator requests to commingle offshore oil production from multiple reservoirs within a single well unless there is conclusive evidence that safety is threatened or aggregate production could decline. The Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement currently generally allows offshore leaseholders to commingle production if the pressure differential between reservoirs is under 200 pounds per square inch, though in one region, that differential is set at below 1,500 pounds per square inch. The legislation would authorize commingling at any pressure differential if safety and production are unaffected.

    According to academic research and industry feedback, commingled wells can be more productive, on average, than sequential wells. On that basis, CBO expects that enacting the provision would increase the number of commingled wells, leading to increased production. CBO also expects that future leased tracts would become more valuable, increasing the amount of future bonus bids on offshore leases.

    Using information from BOEM, the Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement, and industry groups, CBO expects that the provision would increase offsetting receipts relative to current law. This section interacts with section 80171 and CBO has shown its effects in the estimate for that section.

    Limitations of Amount of Distributed Qualified Outer Continental Shelf Revenues. Section 80173 would amend the Gulf of Mexico Energy Security Act of 2006 to increase the amount of energy receipts that may be distributed to states and conservation programs. Under current law, not more than $500 million in receipts collected from leases entered into on or after December 2006 may be distributed in each year through 2055; the legislation would allow up to $650 million to be distributed in each year through 2034. CBO expects that the new funding resulting from increasing the cap would be subject to sequestration beginning in 2027, which would reduce spending by about $50 million over the 2027-2032 period. Accounting for sequestration, CBO estimates that increasing the cap to $650 million would increase direct spending outlays by $1.2 billion over the 2025-2034 period.

    Part IX. Renewable Energy

    Part IX would establish a standard formula to calculate the capacity fee (an equivalent to royalty payment) paid to the federal government under geothermal leases and require the Treasury to distribute a part of those receipts to the states and counties where the operations take place. Sections 80181 and 80182 interact and CBO has shown the estimate of their combined budgetary effects in the estimate for section 80181.

    Renewable Energy Fees on Federal Lands. Section 80181 would establish a formula to calculate rental rates and the capacity fees paid to the federal government under solar and wind leases on federal land. A capacity fee is a royalty based on the energy produced and sold under those leases. Under current law, BLM establishes and can modify those formulas by rule. The capacity fee calculation under this provision would apply to existing and new leases and would, in CBO’s estimation, increase the total offsetting receipts collected relative to current law. Using information from BLM on current and estimated future wind and solar projects, CBO estimates that enacting the provision would increase offsetting receipts by $180 million over the 2025-2034 period, after adjusting for the effects of sequestration.

    Renewable Energy Revenue Sharing. Section 80182 would require the Treasury to distribute 25 percent of the offsetting receipts from wind and solar leases on federal land to the states and counties where those operations take place. The federal government does not currently distribute any of those receipts to states. CBO estimates that enacting this provision would increase direct spending over the 2025-2034 period. This section interacts with section 80181 and CBO has shown its budgetary effects in the estimate for section 80181.

    Subtitle B. Water, Wildlife, and Fisheries

    Subtitle B would rescind certain unobligated balances from funds directly appropriated in the 2022 reconciliation act and provide funding for water storage and conveyance activities. CBO estimates that enacting the subtitle would increase outlays, on net, by $2.4 billion over the 2025-2034 period.

    Rescission of Funds. Sections 80201 and 80202 would rescind certain unobligated balances of funds directly appropriated in the 2022 reconciliation act. Using information from OMB, CBO estimates that enacting those sections would decrease outlays over the 2025-2034 period by the following amounts:

    • $100 million for Investing in Coastal Communities and Climate Resilience; and

    $29 million for Facilities of National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

    Surface Water Storage Enhancement. Section 80203 would provide $2 billion in 2025 to the Bureau of Reclamation (BOR) to increase the capacity of existing surface water storage facilities. The section also would exempt those funds from cost-sharing, matching, and reimbursement requirements, which are typical for financing projects for developing water storage.

    CBO expects that the funds would allow BOR to move forward with the Shasta Dam and Reservoir Enlargement Project by removing the requirement to engage a nonfederal partner. Based on historical spending patterns and information from the agency, CBO estimates that enacting this provision would increase direct spending by $2 billion over the 2025-2034 period.

    Water Conveyance Enhancement. Section 80204 would directly appropriate $500 million in 2025 to BOR to increase the capacity of existing water conveyance facilities. Based on historical spending patterns and information from the agency, CBO expects that the amounts provided would be fully spent over the 2025-2034 period.

    Section 80204 also would exempt the amounts provided from cost-sharing, matching, and reimbursement requirements, which are typical for financing conveyance projects. That could affect spending subject to appropriation, but CBO has not reviewed this provision for such effects.

    Subtitle C. Federal Lands

    Subtitle C would prohibit BLM from implementing certain resource management plans and rescind unobligated funds from the Forest Service and BLM. CBO estimates that enacting the subtitle would decrease direct spending by $1.6 billion over the 2025-2034 period.

    Prohibition on the Implementation of Field Office Management Plans. Sections 80301 through 80305 would prohibit DOI from implementing, administering, or enforcing five BLM Resource Management Plans made final between October 2024 and January 2025 for the Rock Springs and Buffalo Field Offices in Wyoming, the Miles City Field Office in Montana, a statewide plan for North Dakota, and the Colorado River Valley and Grand Junction Field Offices in Colorado. After adjusting for the effects of sequestration, CBO estimates that enacting those provisions would decrease direct spending by a total of $261 million over the 2026-2034 period.

    Rescissions of Funds. Sections 80306, 80307, 80308, and 80309 would rescind certain unobligated balances of funds directly appropriated in the 2022 reconciliation act. Using information from the OMB, CBO estimates that enacting those rescissions would decrease outlays over the 2025-2034 period by $287 million for the Forest Service, the National Park Service, and BLM.

    Celebrating America’s 250th Anniversary. Section 80310 would provide $190 million for DOI to commemorate the 250th anniversary of the founding of the United States of America and establish and maintain a statuary park named the National Garden of American Heroes. Based on historical spending patterns, CBO expects that the directly appropriated amounts would be fully spent over the 2025-2034 period.

    Long-Term Contracts for the Forest Service. Section 80311 would require the Forest Service to enter into at least one 20-year contract for timber harvesting per region each year over the 2025-2029 period. CBO expects that the sales required within one year of enactment would occur in a later year.

    This section would establish the contracts’ terms and conditions. Under current law, proceeds from national forests’ timber sales are deposited into various funds, depending on the authority under which the sale is conducted; amounts deposited into those funds can be spent without further appropriation. This provision would require the proceeds from the sales conducted under the legislation to be deposited in the Treasury. Thus, CBO estimates that enacting the provision would decrease direct spending over the 2025-2034 period.

    CBO estimates that section 80311 would interact with section 80313. That section would require the Forest Service to harvest and sell a minimum of 25 percent more timber than the amounts it sold in fiscal year 2024.

    CBO estimates that of the additional timber sales conducted under section 80313, half could be harvested through the required long-term contracts. Using data on timber sales and accounting for the interaction between the two sections, CBO estimates that enacting those sections would increase offsetting receipts by $111 million over the 2025-2034 period.

    Long-Term Contracts for the Bureau of Land Management. Section 80312 would require BLM to enter at least one 20-year contract for timber harvesting per region each year over the 2025-2029 period.

    This section would establish the contracts’ terms and conditions. Under current law, most proceeds of timber sales on public land under the jurisdiction of BLM are deposited into various funds depending on the authority under which the sale is conducted; amounts deposited into those funds can be spent without further appropriation. This provision would require the proceeds from the sales conducted under the legislation to be deposited in the Treasury as offsetting receipts. Thus, CBO estimates that enacting the provision would decrease direct spending over the 2025-2034 period.

    CBO estimates that half of the timber sold under section 80314 could be harvested under long-term contracts. That section would require BLM to harvest and sell a minimum of 25 percent more timber than it sold in fiscal year 2024. Using data on timber sales and accounting for the interaction between the sections, CBO estimates that enacting those sections would increase offsetting receipts by $46 million over the 2025-2034 period. Furthermore, CBO expects that the sales required within a year of enactment would occur in a later year. CBO expects that section 80312 would interact with section 80314 and the combined estimated budgetary effects are shown in the estimate for section 80312.

    Bureau of Land Management Land in Nevada. Section 80315 would direct DOI to identify and convey federal land, managed by BLM, in non-metropolitan areas of four counties in Nevada. The provision would require BLM to sell the land below fair-market value upon request by certain counties to use it for affordable housing. Otherwise, the land would be sold or exchanged for a price that is at or above fair-market value. Proceeds from those sales are recorded in the budget as offsetting receipts.

    Based on public maps describing available land for disposal in the state and information from BLM, CBO estimates that roughly 400,000 acres are identified for conveyance under this section. Much of that land is in Pershing County and is estimated to be encumbered with mining claims, millsites, or tunnel sites (roughly 250,000 acres). Encumbered land would be offered at fair-market value to the owner of the encumbrance under this section, and CBO expects that those acres would be conveyed over the 2025‑2034 period. For the remaining acres, CBO used a 50 percent probability that some of the available land would be identified for disposal and a 50 percent probability that the land so identified would be conveyed. On that basis, CBO estimates that 40,000 acres would be conveyed under the legislation over the next 10 years.

    Using information from DOI, related organizations, and past land sales in the state, CBO estimates that enacting this section would reduce direct spending by $819 million over the 2025-2034 period.

    Forest Service Land in Nevada. Section 80316 would direct the Department of Agriculture to identify and convey federal land managed by the Forest Service in Washoe County, Nevada. The provision would require the department to sell the land below fair-market value upon request by the county to use for affordable housing. Otherwise, the land would be sold at or above fair-market value. Proceeds from the sales would be recorded in the budget as offsetting receipts. Based on information from other land sales, CBO estimates that enacting section 80316 would reduce direct spending by $7 million over the 2025-2034 period.

    Federal Land in Utah. Section 80317 would require DOI to convey roughly 11,000 acres of federal land managed by BLM in Utah. The section would require DOI to sell the land at or above fair-market value. CBO expects that identifying and conveying the land would take several years. Proceeds from the sales would be recorded in the budget as offsetting receipts Using information on land values from BLM, CBO estimates that enacting section 80317 would reduce direct spending by $293 million over the 2025-2034 period.

    Revenues

    Enacting the legislation would increase revenues by $1.2 billion over the 2025-2034 period. (see On that basis, CBO estimates that enacting section 80151 would increase revenues, on net, by $1.2 billion over the 2025-2034 period.

    Uncertainty

    Many of CBO’s estimates for spending and revenues are subject to uncertainty because they rely on underlying projections and other estimates that are themselves uncertain.

    Several areas of the legislation are subject to particular uncertainty:

    • Projecting bonus bids, rents, and royalties from onshore and offshore oil, gas, and coal leasing depends on future prices of those fuels and minerals, the number of new leases that would begin production within the 10-year window, and the amount of production per lease, all of which are subject to market conditions and individual responses by public and private-sector entities;
    • Projecting bonus bids, rents, and royalties from renewable-energy leases depends on future prices of electricity and grid capacity, the number of new leases that would produce electricity, and the amount of electricity produced per lease, all of which are subject to market conditions and individual responses by public and private-sector entities;
    • Estimating bonus bids for leases in the National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska and the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge requires CBO to make assumptions that might differ from those of potential bidders, including our projections of long-term oil and gas prices and estimated production costs. For more information about the uncertainty of the estimates related to Alaska, see the discussion above in the section “Part III. Alaska”;
    • Anticipating market conditions and the risk tolerance of nonfederal entities make it difficult to project the amount of fees that those entities would pay for exemptions from judicial review under section 80151;
    • Projecting timelines is difficult for federally funded projects that could accelerate or newly start because of the judicial review provision; and
    • Projecting receipts from the conveyance of federal land in Nevada and Utah because of uncertain timelines, land value, and acreage.

    Pay-As-You-Go Considerations

    The Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010 establishes budget-reporting and enforcement procedures for legislation affecting direct spending or revenues. The net changes in outlays and revenues that are subject to those pay-as-you-go procedures are shown in Acting Chief, Natural and Physical Resources Cost Estimates Unit

    Kathleen FitzGerald
    Chief, Public and Private Mandates Unit

    Christina Hawley Anthony
    Deputy Director of Budget Analysis

    H. Samuel Papenfuss 
    Deputy Director of Budget Analysis

    Chad Chirico 
    Director of Budget Analysis

    Phillip L. Swagel

    Director, Congressional Budget Office

    Table 2.

    Estimated Changes in Direct Spending and Revenues Under Reconciliation Recommendations Title VIII, Committee on Natural Resources, as Ordered Reported on May 6, 2025

     

    By Fiscal Year, Millions of Dollars

       
     

    2025

    2026

    2027

    2028

    2029

    2030

    2031

    2032

    2033

    2034

    2025-2029

    2025-2034

     

    Increases or Decreases (-) in Direct Spending

       

    Subtitle A. Energy and Mineral Resources

                       

    Part I. Oil and Gas

                           

    Sec. 80101, Onshore Oil and Gas Lease Salesa

                         

    Budget Authority

    0

    -210

    -686

    -1,102

    -1,333

    -1,552

    -1,730

    -1,854

    -2,043

    -2,260

    -3,331

    -12,770

    Estimated Outlays

    0

    -210

    -686

    -1,102

    -1,333

    -1,552

    -1,730

    -1,854

    -2,043

    -2,260

    -3,331

    -12,770

    Part II: Geothermal

                           

    Sec. 80111, Geothermal Leasingb

                         

    Budget Authority

    0

    -1

    -1

    -2

    -2

    -3

    -3

    -3

    -3

    -5

    -6

    -23

    Estimated Outlays

    0

    -1

    -1

    -2

    -2

    -3

    -3

    -3

    -3

    -5

    -6

    -23

    Part III. Alaska

                           

    Sec. 80121, Coastal Plain Oil and Gas Leasing

                           

    Budget Authority

    0

    -219

    -3

    -15

    -2

    -15

    -3

    -16

    -332

    -341

    -239

    -946

    Estimated Outlays

    0

    -219

    -3

    -15

    -2

    -15

    -3

    -16

    -332

    -341

    -239

    -946

    Sec. 80122, National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska

                           

    Budget Authority

    0

    -80

    -5

    -90

    -6

    -95

    -11

    -97

    -34

    -114

    -181

    -532

    Estimated Outlays

    0

    -80

    -5

    -90

    -6

    -95

    -11

    -97

    -34

    -114

    -181

    -532

    Part IV. Mining

                           

    Sec. 80131, Superior National Forest Lands in Minnesota

                         

    Budget Authority

    -1

    *

    -1

    *

    -1

    *

    -1

    -22

    -28

    -27

    -3

    -81

    Estimated Outlays

    -1

    *

    -1

    *

    -1

    *

    -1

    -22

    -28

    -27

    -3

    -81

    Sec. 80132, Ambler Road in Alaska

                         

    Budget Authority

    0

    *

    -1

    *

    -1

    *

    -1

    *

    -1

    *

    -2

    -4

    Estimated Outlays

    0

    *

    -1

    *

    -1

    *

    -1

    *

    -1

    *

    -2

    -4

    Part V. Coal

                           

    Sec. 80141, Coal Leasingc

                           

    Budget Authority

    0

    84

    67

    61

    57

    -107

    -101

    -98

    -99

    -101

    269

    -237

    Estimated Outlays

    0

    84

    67

    61

    57

    -107

    -101

    -98

    -99

    -101

    269

    -237

    Sec. 80144, Authorization to Mine Federal Minerals

                           

    Budget Authority

    0

    -14

    -15

    -14

    1

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    -42

    -42

    Estimated Outlays

    0

    -14

    -15

    -14

    1

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    -42

    -42

                         

    (Continued)

    Table 2.

    Estimated Changes in Direct Spending and Revenues Under Reconciliation Recommendations Title VIII, Committee on Natural Resources, as Ordered Reported on May 6, 2025

    (Continued)

     

    By Fiscal Year, Millions of Dollars

       
     

    2025

    2026

    2027

    2028

    2029

    2030

    2031

    2032

    2033

    2034

    2025-2029

    2025-2034

     

    Increases or Decreases (-) in Direct Spending

       

    Part VI. NEPA

                           

    Sec. 80151, Project Sponsor Opt-In Fees for Environmental Reviews

                         

    Budget Authority

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    Estimated Outlays

    0

    0

    *

    5

    15

    25

    30

    35

    40

    40

    20

    190

    Sec. 80152, Rescission Relating to Environmental and Data Collection

                         

    Budget Authority

    -25

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    -25

    -25

    Estimated Outlays

    -7

    -6

    -6

    -6

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    -25

    -25

    Part VII. Miscellaneous

                           

    Sec. 80161, Protest Fees

                           

    Budget Authority

    0

    *

    -1

    *

    -1

    *

    -1

    *

    -2

    *

    -2

    -5

    Estimated Outlays

    0

    *

    -1

    *

    -1

    *

    -1

    *

    -2

    *

    -2

    -5

    Part VIII: Offshore Oil and Gas Leasing

                       

    Sec. 80171, Mandatory Offshore Oil and Gas Lease Salesd

                         

    Budget Authority

    0

    -160

    -170

    -530

    -390

    -540

    -800

    -1,010

    -1,240

    -1,450

    -1,250

    -6,290

    Estimated Outlays

    0

    -160

    -170

    -530

    -390

    -540

    -800

    -1,010

    -1,240

    -1,450

    -1,250

    -6,290

    Sec. 80173, Limitations on Amount of Distributed Qualified Outer Continental Shelf Revenues

                       

    Budget Authority

    0

    150

    140

    140

    140

    140

    140

    145

    150

    150

    570

    1,295

    Estimated Outlays

    0

    120

    120

    130

    140

    140

    140

    145

    150

    150

    510

    1,235

    Part IX: Renewable Energy

                           

    Sec. 80181, Renewable Energy Fees on Federal Landse

                         

    Budget Authority

    0

    -5

    -5

    -6

    -13

    -21

    -28

    -27

    -37

    -38

    -29

    -180

    Estimated Outlays

    0

    -5

    -5

    -6

    -13

    -21

    -28

    -27

    -37

    -38

    -29

    -180

                         

    (Continued)

    Table 2.

    Estimated Changes in Direct Spending and Revenues Under Reconciliation Recommendations Title VIII, Committee on Natural Resources, as Ordered Reported on May 6, 2025

    (Continued)

     

    By Fiscal Year, Millions of Dollars

       
     

    2025

    2026

    2027

    2028

    2029

    2030

    2031

    2032

    2033

    2034

    2025-2029

    2025-2034

     

    Increases or Decreases (-) in Direct Spending

       

    Subtitle B: Water, Wildlife, and Fisheries

                       

    Sec. 80201, Rescission of Funds for Investing in Coastal Communities and Climate Resilience

                       

    Budget Authority

    -280

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    -280

    -280

    Estimated Outlays

    -40

    -20

    -15

    -15

    -10

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    -100

    -100

    Sec. 80202, Rescission of Funds for Facilities of National Atmospheric Administration and National Marine Sanctuaries

                       

    Budget Authority

    -29

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    -29

    -29

    Estimated Outlays

    -7

    -7

    -7

    -6

    -2

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    -29

    -29

    Sec. 80203, Surface Water Storage Enhancement

                           

    Budget Authority

    2,000

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    2,000

    2,000

    Estimated Outlays

    0

    31

    71

    108

    109

    209

    417

    418

    418

    219

    319

    2,000

    Sec. 80204, Water Conveyance Enhancement

                         

    Budget Authority

    500

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    500

    500

    Estimated Outlays

    0

    25

    175

    150

    150

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    500

    500

    Subtitle C: Federal Lands

                           

    Sec. 80301, Prohibition on the Implementation of the Rock Springs Field Office, Wyoming, Resource Management Plan

                       

    Budget Authority

    0

    -4

    *

    *

    -21

    -24

    -26

    -29

    -29

    -30

    -25

    -163

    Estimated Outlays

    0

    -4

    *

    *

    -21

    -24

    -26

    -29

    -29

    -30

    -25

    -163

    Sec. 80303, Prohibition on the Implementation of the Miles City Field Office, Montana, Resource Management Plan

                       

    Budget Authority

    0

    -3

    -3

    -3

    -3

    -4

    0

    0

    0

    0

    -12

    -16

    Estimated Outlays

    0

    -3

    -3

    -3

    -3

    -4

    0

    0

    0

    0

    -12

    -16

    Sec. 80304, Prohibition on the Implementation of the North Dakota Resource Management Plan

                       

    Budget Authority

    0

    -4

    *

    *

    *

    *

    -1

    *

    *

    *

    -4

    -5

    Estimated Outlays

    0

    -4

    *

    *

    *

    *

    -1

    *

    *

    *

    -4

    -5

    Sec. 80305, Prohibition on the Implementation of the Colorado River Valley Field Office and Grand Junction Field Office Resource Management Plans

                       

    Budget Authority

    0

    -4

    *

    *

    -12

    -12

    -12

    -12

    -12

    -13

    -16

    -77

    Estimated Outlays

    0

    -4

    *

    *

    -12

    -12

    -12

    -12

    -12

    -13

    -16

    -77

                         

    (Continued)

    Table 2.

    Estimated Changes in Direct Spending and Revenues Under Reconciliation Recommendations Title VIII, Committee on Natural Resources, as Ordered Reported on May 6, 2025

    (Continued)

     

    By Fiscal Year, Millions of Dollars

       
     

    2025

    2026

    2027

    2028

    2029

    2030

    2031

    2032

    2033

    2034

    2025-2029

    2025-2034

     

    Increases or Decreases (-) in Direct Spending

       

    Sec. 80306, Rescission of Forest Service Funds

                         

    Budget Authority

    -8

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    -8

    -8

    Estimated Outlays

    -3

    -2

    -1

    -1

    -1

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    -8

    -8

    Sec. 80307, Rescission of National Park Service and Bureau of Land Management Funds

                       

    Budget Authority

    -7

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    -7

    -7

    Estimated Outlays

    -2

    -1

    -1

    -1

    -1

    -1

    0

    0

    0

    0

    -6

    -7

    Sec. 80308, Rescission of Bureau of Land Management and National Park Service Funds

                       

    Budget Authority

    -5

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    -5

    -5

    Estimated Outlays

    -2

    -1

    -1

    -1

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    -5

    -5

    Sec. 80309, Rescission of National Park Service Funds

                           

    Budget Authority

    -317

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    -317

    -317

    Estimated Outlays

    -75

    -63

    -44

    -36

    -26

    -20

    -3

    0

    0

    0

    -244

    -267

    Sec. 80310, Celebrating America’s 250th Anniversary

                           

    Budget Authority

    190

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    190

    190

    Estimated Outlays

    15

    128

    25

    12

    10

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    190

    190

    Sec. 80311, Long-Term Contracts for the Forest Servicef

                         

    Budget Authority

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    -19

    -21

    -22

    -24

    -25

    0

    -111

    Estimated Outlays

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    -19

    -21

    -22

    -24

    -25

    0

    -111

    Sec. 80312, Long-Term Contracts for the Bureau of Land Managementg

                         

    Budget Authority

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    -8

    -8

    -10

    -10

    -10

    0

    -46

    Estimated Outlays

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    -8

    -8

    -10

    -10

    -10

    0

    -46

    Sec. 80315, Bureau of Land Management Land in Nevada

                         

    Budget Authority

    0

    -91

    -91

    -91

    -91

    -91

    -91

    -91

    -91

    -91

    -364

    -819

    Estimated Outlays

    0

    -91

    -91

    -91

    -91

    -91

    -91

    -91

    -91

    -91

    -364

    -819

    Sec. 80316, Forest Service Land in Nevada

                           

    Budget Authority

    0

    -3

    -4

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    -7

    -7

    Estimated Outlays

    0

    -3

    -4

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    -7

    -7

    Sec. 80317, Federal Land in Utah

                         

    Budget Authority

    0

    -11

    -56

    -70

    -70

    -86

    0

    0

    0

    0

    -207

    -293

    Estimated Outlays

    0

    -11

    -56

    -70

    -70

    -86

    0

    0

    0

    0

    -207

    -293

                         

    (Continued)

    Table 2.

    Estimated Changes in Direct Spending and Revenues Under Reconciliation Recommendations Title VIII, Committee on Natural Resources, as Ordered Reported on May 6, 2025

    (Continued)

     

    By Fiscal Year, Millions of Dollars

       
     

    2025

    2026

    2027

    2028

    2029

    2030

    2031

    2032

    2033

    2034

    2025-2029

    2025-2034

     

    Increases or Decreases (-) in Direct Spending

       

    Total Changes

                           

    Budget Authority

    2,018

    -575

    -835

    -1,722

    -1,748

    -2,437

    -2,698

    -3,146

    -3,835

    -4,355

    -2,862

    -19,333

    Estimated Outlays

    -122

    -521

    -659

    -1,523

    -1,504

    -2,224

    -2,254

    -2,693

    -3,377

    -4,096

    -4,329

    -18,973

     

    Increases in Revenues

       

    Sec. 80151, Project Sponsor Opt-In Fees for Environmental Reviews

                         

    Estimated Revenues

    0

    65

    130

    130

    135

    140

    140

    145

    150

    150

    460

    1,185

    Total Changes

                           

    Estimated Revenues

    0

    65

    130

    130

    135

    140

    140

    145

    150

    150

    460

    1,185

     

    Net Decrease in the Deficit

    From Changes in Direct Spending and Revenues

       

    Effect on the Deficit

    -122

    -586

    -789

    -1,653

    -1,639

    -2,364

    -2,394

    -2,838

    -3,527

    -4,246

    -4,789

    -20,158

    a. Includes amounts for sections 80102, 80103, 80104, and 80105.

    b. Includes amounts for section 80112.

    c. Includes amounts for sections 80142, 80143, and 80302.

    d. Includes amounts for section 80172.

    e. Includes amounts for section 80182.

    f. Includes amounts for section 80313.

    g. Includes amounts for section 80314.

    MIL OSI USA News