NewzIntel.com

    • Checkout Page
    • Contact Us
    • Default Redirect Page
    • Frontpage
    • Home-2
    • Home-3
    • Lost Password
    • Member Login
    • Member LogOut
    • Member TOS Page
    • My Account
    • NewzIntel Alert Control-Panel
    • NewzIntel Latest Reports
    • Post Views Counter
    • Privacy Policy
    • Public Individual Page
    • Register
    • Subscription Plan
    • Thank You Page

Category: United States of America

  • MIL-OSI: Varonis Heads to Black Hat USA 2025, DEF CON, and BSides

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    MIAMI, July 22, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Varonis Systems, Inc. (Nasdaq: VRNS) is heading to Las Vegas this August for the cybersecurity world’s summer camp — Black Hat USA 2025, DEF CON, and BSides. Varonis will be on the ground sharing insights from our elite Varonis Threat Labs team, showcasing how to secure data from threats across multi-cloud environments, and connecting with the community that’s shaping the future of cyber defense.

    Varonis Highlights at Black Hat USA 2025:

    Meet Varonis at booth #2751. Varonis proudly returns to Black Hat USA 2025 as a Platinum Plus Sponsor and Sustaining Partner. Learn how Varonis’ cloud-native Data Security Platform enables organizations to reduce risk to data in the age of AI. Hear how Varonis identifies and mitigates threats across IaaS and SaaS, safeguards sensitive data, and supports customers with Managed Data Detection and Response, the industry’s only service dedicated to preventing attacks on data.

    Play the first Snowflake GOAT. Can you trace the attacker’s steps and stop a breach from becoming a data avalanche? Check out our capture-the-flag challenge online and at our booth for your chance to top the leaderboard and pick up the coolest swag at Black Hat!

    Play today: https://www.varonis.com/frostbyte

    Expert Session — Navigating the Identity Crisis: Why Authentication Keeps Failing.  Join Varonis’ Mark Vaitsman to explore how attackers continue to compromise authentication and steal identities. Learn how to recognize the signs of post-authentication compromise, identify detection and response gaps, and harden security beyond MFA.

    Date: Wednesday, August 6 at 10:50 a.m.
    Location: Business Hall Theater D

    Varonis Highlights at BSides Las Vegas:

    Expert Session — Rusty Pearls: Postgres RCE on Cloud Databases. Join Varonis Threat Labs experts as they unpack a critical Remote Code Execution vulnerability affecting cloud-hosted databases. Learn how they discovered this flaw and transformed it into a powerful exploit. They’ll share detection strategies, defense techniques, and more.

    Date: Tuesday, August 5 at 10:30 a.m.
    Location: Florentine A

    Varonis Highlights at DEF CON Las Vegas:

    Workshop — SnowGoat: Exposing Hidden Security Risks and Leaking Data Like a Threat Actor. Join senior security researchers Lior Adar and Chen Levy Ben Aroy for an interactive workshop on identifying hidden configuration risks in Snowflake. This intermediate session offers hands-on experience with vulnerable and misconfigured environments.

    Date: Friday, August 8 at 9:00 a.m.
    Location: Las Vegas Convention Center – L2 – Workshops

    Expert Session — Rusty Pearls: Postgres RCE on Cloud Databases. Join Varonis Threat Labs experts as they unpack a critical Remote Code Execution vulnerability affecting cloud-hosted databases. Learn how they discovered this flaw and transformed it into a powerful exploit. They’ll share detection strategies, defense techniques, and more.

    Date: Friday, August 8 at 5:30 p.m.
    Location: Las Vegas Convention Center – L1 – EHW3 – Track 1

    Additional Resources

    About Varonis
    Varonis (Nasdaq: VRNS) is a leader in data security, fighting a different battle than conventional cybersecurity companies. Our cloud-native Data Security Platform continuously discovers and classifies critical data, removes exposures, and detects advanced threats with AI-powered automation.

    Thousands of organizations worldwide trust Varonis to defend their data wherever it lives — across SaaS, IaaS, and hybrid cloud environments. Customers use Varonis to automate a wide range of security outcomes, including data security posture management (DSPM), data classification, data access governance (DAG), data detection and response (DDR), data loss prevention (DLP), AI security, identity protection, and insider risk management.

    Varonis protects data first, not last. Learn more at www.varonis.com. 

    Investor Relations Contact:
    Tim Perz
    Varonis Systems, Inc.
    646-640-2112
    investors@varonis.com

    News Media Contact:
    Rachel Hunt
    Varonis Systems, Inc.
    877-292-8767 (ext. 1598)
    pr@varonis.com

    The MIL Network –

    July 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Economics: 2025 External Sector Report: Global Imbalances in a Shifting World

    Source: International Monetary Fund

    Chapter 1: External Positions and Policies

    Current accounts in major economies diverged significantly in 2024, widening global current account balances by 0.6 percentage points of world GDP. This widening, driven by domestic macro imbalances, represents a sizable reversal from the post-pandemic narrowing. Staff assessment suggests that excess current account balances account for about two-thirds of the widening in global current account balances. The assessed increase in excess current account balances is the largest in a decade, with major economies—China, the United States and the euro area—driving the increase. Such rapid and globally sizable increase in excess current account balances in major economies can generate significant negative cross-border spillovers. In 2025 and over the medium term, a delay in macroeconomic adjustments to correct the post-pandemic domestic macro imbalances could result in continued current account divergence in major economies, while addressing domestic imbalances could bring about a convergence of major current account balances.

    MIL OSI Economics –

    July 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Analysis: Imaginary athletes: Creating make-believe teammates, competitors and coaches during play

    Source: The Conversation – USA – By Tracy Gleason, Professor of Psychology, Wellesley College

    What would an imaginary companion add to a child’s solo practice? Elkhophoto/iStock via Getty Images Plus

    The coach, the specialized equipment, the carefully tailored exercise regimen – they’re all key to athletic performance. But imagination might be an unexpected asset when it comes to playing sports.

    The idea that athletic achievement depends on the mind isn’t new. Sport psychologists have known for years that working with an athlete on their mental game – visualizing the skill, kinesthetically feeling the swing – has a positive impact on actual performance. But these mental simulations draw only upon mental imagery – seeing and feeling the physical goals in the mind’s eye. Imagination offers a much wider range of possibilities.

    What if your game could be helped by an imaginary friend?

    In a recent retrospective study of college students, we discovered that imagination comes in handy in athletics in ways that are surprisingly social. The creation of what we termed imaginary athletes – a person or being that a child imagined in the context of athletics – enabled and motivated athletic play, especially for children between the ages of about 6 and 12. Imaginary athletes also provided companionship during athletic play.

    An imaginary teammate or competitor might help improve a child’s game.
    NoSystem images/E+ via Getty Images

    Remembering childhood imaginary athletes

    The most basic form of an imaginary athlete might be a wall, fence or even tree that makes a good opponent in a pinch. For a child or adolescent practicing a sport alone, a surface that provides a ball return or a steady target for a throw gives opportunities for practice usually requiring other players.

    Is it any wonder, then, if the branches of the tree start to resemble a wide receiver’s arms, or an invisible goalie emerges in front of the fence? Solitary play might be a lot more fun if a make-believe teammate could provide an assist, or an invisible coach could appear and shout instructions during practice.

    The college students in our study reported that such support, even if imaginary, made them play a little longer or try a little harder as kids.

    About 41% of our sample of 225 college students reported creating at least one imaginary athlete at some point in middle childhood or early adolescence. Most, but not all, of these beings fell into three categories based on their characteristics.

    The first we called placeholders, such as ghost runners. They are typically generic, amorphous, imaginary teammates created by groups of children when not enough real players are available.

    The second type functioned as what we named athletic tools. They helped kids focus on their performance and improve their skills, usually by providing a worthy competitor, sometimes based on an admired professional athlete. The skills of athletic tools were often just above those of the child, drawing out the desire to be better, stronger, faster.

    Social relationships, our name for the third kind of imaginary athlete, primarily served emotional functions, relieving loneliness and providing the child or adolescent with a sense of belonging, safety or companionship as they engaged in their sport.

    Students who remembered imaginary athletes differed from their peers in two ways. First, more men than women reported creating these imaginary beings, possibly owing to the greater investment in and importance of athletics among boys versus girls. Second, people with imaginary athletes scored higher than those without on a current-day measure of predilection for imagination, but they were not more likely to report having created a make-believe friend or animal as a child.

    Imagination is a valuable power

    Creating an imaginary other might seem like a quirky, perhaps even childish, addition to sports practice. But actually, this behavior is entirely logical. After all, imagination is the core of human thought. Without it, we couldn’t conceptualize anything outside of the present moment that wasn’t already stored in memory. No thinking about the future, no consideration of multiple outcomes to a decision, no counterfactuals, daydreams, fantasies or plans.

    Why wouldn’t people apply such a fundamental tool of day-to-day thought in athletic contexts? Participation in sports is common, especially among school-age kids, and many college students in our study described drawing upon their imaginations frequently when playing sports, especially when doing so in their free time.

    Imagination is a core part of being human – it’s not a surprise it comes out on the sports field.
    Erik Isakson/Tetra images via Getty Images

    The creation of imaginary athletes is also unsurprising because it’s one of myriad ways that imagination enhances people’s social worlds throughout their lives. Above all else, social relationships are what matter most to people, and using imagination in thinking about them is common. For instance, people imagine conversations with others, particularly those close to them, sometimes practicing the delivery of bad news or envisioning the response to a proposal of marriage.

    In early childhood, kids create imaginary companions who help them learn about friendship and other’s perspectives. And in adolescence, when people focus on developing their autonomy and their own identities, they create parasocial relationships that let them identify with favorite celebrities, characters and media figures. Even in older age, some widows and widowers imagine continued relationships with their deceased spouses. These “continuing bonds” are efforts to cope with loss through imaginary narratives that are fed by and extrapolate upon years of interactions.

    At each point in their developmental trajectory, people might recruit imagination to help them understand, manage, regulate and enjoy the social aspects of life. Imaginary athletes are merely one manifestation of this habit.

    Because so many children and adolescents spend a lot of time engaged in sports, athletics can be a major environment for working on the developmental tasks of growing up. As children learn about functioning as part of a group, forming, maintaining and losing friendships, and mastering a range of skills and abilities, imaginary athletes provide teammates, coaches and competitors tailored to the needs of the moment.

    Of course, an imaginary athlete is but one tool that children and adolescents might use to address developmental tasks such as mastering skills or negotiating peer relationships. Children who aren’t fantasy-prone might create complex training regimens to practice their skills, and they might manage their friendships by talking through problems with others.

    But some report that turning inward generated real athletic and social benefits. “I got confidence out of my [imaginary athletes],” reported one participant. “If I could imagine beating someone, and [winning], then I felt like I could do anything.”

    The authors do not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and have disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    – ref. Imaginary athletes: Creating make-believe teammates, competitors and coaches during play – https://theconversation.com/imaginary-athletes-creating-make-believe-teammates-competitors-and-coaches-during-play-254879

    MIL OSI Analysis –

    July 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Medical Procedure Kits Correction: Medline Industries, LP Issues Correction for Medline Craniotomy Kits Containing Codman Disposable Perforators Due to Risk for Device Disassembly

    Source: US Department of Health and Human Services – 3

    Craniotomy Kit
    DYNJ35349C
    10888277858060 (EA), 40888277858061 (CASE)
    24CBJ925, 24DBT405, 24FBO318

    CRANI Accessory Pack
    DYNJ59270
    10888277771512 (EA), 40888277771513 (CASE)
    23JDB683, 23JDC548, 24ADB783, 24HDA822

    CRANI PACK-LF
    DYNJ44805M
    10195327506872 (EA), 40195327506873 (CASE)
    23JBI747, 23KBL228, 24ABG696, 24CBM117, 24EBQ114, 24GBJ699

    CRANIOTOMY KIT
    CDS982719V
    10195327510831 (EA), 40195327510832 (CASE)
    23KBP461, 23LBN381, 24ABB119, 24BBC547, 24BBI145

    CRANIOTOMY KIT
    CDS982719W
    10195327645090 (EA), 40195327645091 (CASE)
    24DBS813

    CRANIOTOMY KIT
    DYNJ904168F
    10195327395728 (EA), 40195327395729 (CASE)
    24DBU188

    CRANIOTOMY KIT
    DYNJ908404B
    10195327410506 (EA), 40195327410507 (CASE)
    23IDB680, 23LDB546, 24BDB174, 24FDA741, 24FDB584, 24IDA225, 24IDA646, 24IDA840

    CRANIOTOMY KIT
    DYNJ908723A
    10195327403270 (EA), 40195327403271 (CASE)
    23IBO314, 23JBC218, 24ABK090

    CRANIOTOMY KIT
    DYNJ908723C
    10198459009785 (EA), 40198459009786 (CASE)
    24IBM205, 24IBN365, 25ABM356

    CRANIOTOMY #IMF 56646-LF
    DYNJVB91001A
    10195327466466 (EA), 40195327466467 (CASE)
    23JLA765, 24DLA724, 24DLB006, 24ELA325

    CRANIOTOMY CDS
    CDS981888X
    10195327144760 (EA), 40195327144761 (CASE)
    24ABT432, 24CBD698, 24HBH954, 24HBP483, 24IBG797, 25CBF098

    CRANIOTOMY CDS
    CDS983467I
    10195327457945 (EA), 40195327457946 (CASE)
    23KDA336

    CRANIOTOMY PACK-LF
    DYNJ09882G
    10195327574055 (EA), 40195327574056 (CASE)
    24CBF778

    CRANIOTOMY PACK-LF
    DYNJ09882I
    10198459058172 (EA), 40198459058173 (CASE)
    24HBN426

    CRANIOTOMY S NASSAU
    DYNJ905879G
    10195327512996 (EA), 40195327512997 (CASE)
    23KBI086, 23LBH647, 23LBH649, 24BBU253, 24DBV133, 24FBE409

    MHC CRANIOTOMY
    DYNJ903713K
    10195327201579 (EA), 40195327201570 (CASE)
    23JBK426

    MHC CRANIOTOMY
    DYNJ903713L
    10195327531218 (EA), 40195327531219 (CASE)
    23KBT939, 23LBS862, 24ABH577, 24CBH126, 24CBH771

    PAD CRANIOTOMY
    DYNJ902149J
    10195327554323 (EA), 40195327554324 (CASE)
    23KBP275, 24ABJ684, 24CBF216, 24DBI296, 24EBD959, 24FBF064, 24HBK164, 24IBN443

    CRANI ADD A PACK
    DYNJ30926O
    10195327539153 (EA), 40195327539154 (CASE)
    24AMF811

    CRANIOTOMY KIT
    CDS983611N
    10195327466626 (EA), 40195327466627 (CASE)
    23KBA720, 23LBI611, 23LBJ586

    CRANIOTOMY CDS
    CDS983467J
    10195327561116 (EA), 40195327561117 (CASE)
    24ADA818, 24ADC216, 24BDA929, 24DDB447, 24EDA275, 24EDA751, 24GDB213, 24IDA327, 24IDB043

    CRANIOTOMY PACK
    DYNJ85807A
    10195327637392 (EA), 40195327637393 (CASE)
    24CBB843, 24EBC889, 24GBY029

    CRANIOTOMY PACK
    DYNJ85927
    10195327575571 (EA), 40195327575572 (CASE)
    24BMD310, 24EMI836

    MAJOR CRANIOTOMY PACK
    DYNJ82007A
    10195327635466 (EA), 40195327635467 (CASE)
    24CMA496, 24HMI081, 24HMI978

    MIL OSI USA News –

    July 22, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: Draganfly Secures Strategic Military Order for Commander 3XL UAV Systems

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Tampa Bay, Florida, July 22, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Draganfly Inc. (NASDAQ: DPRO; CSE: DPRO; FSE: 3U8A) (“Draganfly” or the “Company”), an award-winning developer of drone solutions and systems developer, today announced the sale of Commander 3XL Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) systems to a globally recognized defense contractor specializing in persistent surveillance technologies for military operations.

    A trusted partner to U.S. and allied defense forces for decades, the client is one of the world’s leading providers of persistent surveillance platforms. Its systems are deployed across key Department of Defense (DoD) and allied installations, delivering reliable, persistent intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) capabilities.

    The Commander 3XL’s modular payload architecture, extended endurance, and AI-enabled mission control make it an ideal asset for military-grade surveillance programs. The systems will support perimeter security, early warning, and real-time situational awareness, operating seamlessly alongside and integrated with persistent platforms and ground-based command centers.

    “This sale marks a significant milestone for Draganfly as we expand our presence in the defense sector,” said Cameron Chell, CEO of Draganfly. “We are honored that the Commander 3XL has been chosen for integration into one of the world’s most advanced and enduring persistent surveillance platforms. This integration enhances capabilities for military and border surveillance systems, providing greater reach and effectiveness.”

    This purchase further underscores the Commander 3XL’s versatility in both static and dynamic ISR environments, enabling defense clients to adapt swiftly to evolving threat landscapes.

    About Draganfly

    Draganfly Inc. (NASDAQ: DPRO; CSE: DPRO; FSE: 3U8A) is a leader in cutting-edge drone solutions and software that are transforming industries and serving stakeholders globally. Recognized for innovation and excellence for over 25 years, Draganfly delivers award-winning technology to the public safety, agriculture, industrial inspection, security, mapping, and surveying markets. The Company is driven by passion, ingenuity, and a mission to provide efficient solutions and first-class services to customers worldwide, saving time, money, and lives.

    NASDAQ (DPRO)
    CSE (DPRO)
    FSE (3U8)

    Media Contact:
    Erika Racicot
    Email: media@draganfly.com

    Company Contact
    Cameron Chell
    Chief Executive Officer
    (306) 955-9907
    info@draganfly.com

    This release contains certain “forward looking statements” and certain “forward-looking ‎‎‎‎information” as ‎‎‎‎defined under applicable securities laws. Forward-looking statements ‎‎‎‎and information can ‎‎‎‎generally be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as ‎‎‎‎‎“may”, “will”, “expect”, “intend”, ‎‎‎‎‎“estimate”, “anticipate”, “believe”, “continue”, “plans” or similar ‎‎‎‎terminology. Forward-looking statements ‎‎‎‎and information are based on forecasts of future ‎‎‎‎results, estimates of amounts not yet determinable and ‎‎‎‎assumptions that, while believed by ‎‎‎‎management to be reasonable, are inherently subject to significant ‎‎‎‎business, economic and ‎‎‎‎competitive uncertainties and contingencies. Forward-looking statements ‎‎‎‎include, but are not ‎‎‎‎limited to, statements with respect to the Commander 3XL’s modular payload architecture, extended endurance, and AI-enabled mission control make it an ideal asset for military-grade surveillance programs as well as that the systems will support perimeter security, early warning, and real-time situational awareness, operating seamlessly alongside persistent platforms and ground-based command centers. Forward-‎‎‎‎looking statements and information are subject to various ‎known ‎‎and unknown risks and ‎‎‎‎‎uncertainties, many of which are beyond the ability of the Company to ‎control or ‎‎predict, that ‎‎‎‎may cause ‎the Company’s actual results, performance or achievements to be ‎materially ‎‎different ‎‎‎‎from those ‎expressed or implied thereby, and are developed based on assumptions ‎about ‎‎such ‎‎‎‎risks, uncertainties ‎and other factors set out here in, including but not limited to: the potential ‎‎‎‎‎‎‎impact of epidemics, ‎pandemics or other public health crises, including the ‎COVID-19 pandemic, on the Company’s business, operations and financial ‎‎‎‎condition; the ‎‎‎successful integration of ‎technology; the inherent risks involved in the general ‎‎‎‎securities markets; ‎‎‎uncertainties relating to the ‎availability and costs of financing needed in the ‎‎‎‎future; the inherent ‎‎‎uncertainty of cost estimates; the ‎potential for unexpected costs and ‎‎‎‎expenses, currency ‎‎‎fluctuations; regulatory restrictions; and liability, ‎competition, loss of key ‎‎‎‎employees and other related risks ‎‎‎and uncertainties disclosed under the ‎heading “Risk Factors“ ‎‎‎‎in the Company’s most recent filings filed ‎‎‎with securities regulators in Canada on ‎the SEDAR ‎‎‎‎website at www.sedar.com and with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on EDGAR through the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. The Company undertakes ‎‎‎no obligation to update forward-‎looking ‎‎‎‎information except as required by applicable law. Such forward-‎‎‎looking information represents ‎‎‎‎‎managements’ best judgment based on information currently available. ‎‎‎No forward-looking ‎‎‎‎statement ‎can be guaranteed and actual future results may vary materially. ‎‎‎Accordingly, readers ‎‎‎‎are advised not to ‎place undue reliance on forward-looking statements or ‎‎‎information.

    The MIL Network –

    July 22, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Security: USS Pearl Harbor (LSD 52) Sailors perform daily operations [Image 1 of 3]

    Source: United States Navy (Logistics Group Western Pacific)

    Issued by: on


    PACIFIC OCEAN (July 17, 2025) Retail Specialist 3rd Class Hanan Lindow, from Lakeland, Florida, finalizes sales in the ships store aboard the Harpers Ferry-class amphibious dock landing ship USS Pearl Harbor (LSD 52) in the Indo-Pacific region on July 17, 2025. Now in its 21st iteration, the Pacific Partnership series is the largest annual multinational humanitarian assistance and disaster management preparedness mission conducted in the Indo-Pacific. Pacific Partnership works collaboratively with host and partner nations to enhance region and foster new and enduring friendships in the Indo-Pacific. (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist Seaman Isabel Mendoza)

    Date Taken: 07.17.2025
    Date Posted: 07.22.2025 06:56
    Photo ID: 9194907
    VIRIN: 250717-N-DM179-1021
    Resolution: 2800×2000
    Size: 395.02 KB
    Location: US

    Web Views: 1
    Downloads: 0

    PUBLIC DOMAIN  

    This work, USS Pearl Harbor (LSD 52) Sailors perform daily operations [Image 3 of 3], by SN Isabel Mendoza, identified by DVIDS, must comply with the restrictions shown on https://www.dvidshub.net/about/copyright.

    GALLERY

    MORE LIKE THIS

    CONTROLLED VOCABULARY KEYWORDS

    TAGS

    MIL Security OSI –

    July 22, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Security: USS Pearl Harbor (LSD 52) Sailors perform daily operations [Image 2 of 3]

    Source: United States Navy (Logistics Group Western Pacific)

    Issued by: on


    PACIFIC OCEAN (July 17, 2025) Gunner’s Mate 2nd Class Kenneth Rettig, from Gastonia, North Carolina, left, and Senior Chief Boatswain’s Mate Jesus Hernandez, from Tulare, California, right, conduct a spot check for the M18 aboard the Harpers Ferry-class amphibious dock landing ship USS Pearl Harbor (LSD 52) in the Indo-Pacific region on July 17, 2025. Now in its 21st iteration, the Pacific Partnership series is the largest annual multinational humanitarian assistance and disaster management preparedness mission conducted in the Indo-Pacific. Pacific Partnership works collaboratively with host and partner nations to enhance region and foster new and enduring friendships in the Indo-Pacific. (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist Seaman Isabel Mendoza)

    Date Taken: 07.17.2025
    Date Posted: 07.22.2025 06:56
    Photo ID: 9194908
    VIRIN: 250717-N-DM179-1024
    Resolution: 2631×2105
    Size: 647.04 KB
    Location: US

    Web Views: 1
    Downloads: 0

    PUBLIC DOMAIN  

    This work, USS Pearl Harbor (LSD 52) Sailors perform daily operations [Image 3 of 3], by SN Isabel Mendoza, identified by DVIDS, must comply with the restrictions shown on https://www.dvidshub.net/about/copyright.

    GALLERY

    MORE LIKE THIS

    CONTROLLED VOCABULARY KEYWORDS

    TAGS

    MIL Security OSI –

    July 22, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: Bitfarms Announces Corporate Share Buyback Program

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    This news release constitutes a “designated news release” for the purposes of the Company’s second amended and restated prospectus supplement dated December 17, 2024, to its short form base shelf prospectus dated November 10, 2023.

    TORONTO, Ontario, July 22, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Bitfarms Ltd. (Nasdaq/TSX: BITF) (“Bitfarms” or the “Company”), a global energy and compute infrastructure company, today announced that the Board of Directors has approved effective immediately the commencement of a corporate share buyback program. Toronto Stock Exchange (the “TSX”) has accepted the notice filed by the Company to establish a normal course issuer bid program (the “Program”).

    Under the Program, the Company is authorized to purchase up to 49,943,031 of its common shares (out of the 557,548,857 common shares outstanding as at July 14, 2025) representing up to 10% of the Company’s public float of 499,430,313 common shares, during the period starting on July 28, 2025 and ending on July 27, 2026.

    CEO Ben Gagnon stated, “We believe that Bitfarms’ shares are currently undervalued because our Bitcoin business is underappreciated by the market, with little to no value being associated with our HPC potential. This Program demonstrates our confidence in Bitfarms’ business, our management team, and most importantly our high-performance computing data center growth strategy. We strongly believe our unique and highly desirable energy portfolio in Pennsylvania will drive long-term, sustainable growth that is financeable and enables management to leverage its balance sheet strength to drive shareholder value with this buyback program while simultaneously pursuing growth opportunities in HPC/AI to best capitalize on our substantial US energy pipeline.”

    The timing, price and volume of repurchases will depend on a variety of factors including corporate liquidity requirements and priorities, as well as general market conditions, the share price, regulatory requirements and limitations, and other factors.

    Bitfarms may purchase shares, from time to time, through the facilities of the TSX and/or the Nasdaq Stock Market (the “Nasdaq”), or by such other means as may be permitted by the TSX and/or Nasdaq or under applicable law. Daily repurchases on the TSX will be limited to a maximum of 494,918 common shares, representing 25% of the average daily trading volume for the six months ended June 30, 2025 (being 1,979,673 common shares), except where purchases are made in accordance with the “block purchase exception” of the TSX rules. Purchases of common shares through the Nasdaq will be made in the normal course and will not, during the twelve-month period ending July 27, 2026 exceed, in the aggregate, 5% of the outstanding common shares as at the commencement of the Program. All shares purchased by the Company under the Program will be cancelled.

    Purchases will be made by the Company in accordance with the requirements of the TSX and/or the Nasdaq and the price which the Company will pay for any such common shares will be the market price of any such common shares at the time of acquisition, or such other price as may be permitted by the TSX and/or the Nasdaq.

    In connection with the Program, the Company has entered into an automatic repurchase arrangement with its designated broker to allow for purchases of its common shares during certain pre-determined blackout periods, based on Company instructions provided when not in blackout. Outside of these pre-determined blackout periods, any repurchases of common shares will be in accordance with management’s discretion, subject to applicable law. Although the Company has a present intention to acquire its common shares pursuant to the Program, the Company will not be obligated to make any purchases under said Program.

    About Bitfarms Ltd.
    Founded in 2017, Bitfarms is a North American energy and compute infrastructure company that develops, owns, and operates vertically integrated data centers. Bitfarms currently operates 15 data centers situated in four countries, which currently mine Bitcoin: the United States, Canada, Argentina and Paraguay.

    To learn more about Bitfarms’ events, developments, and online communities:

    www.bitfarms.com
    https://www.facebook.com/bitfarms/
    http://x.com/Bitfarms_io
    https://www.instagram.com/bitfarms/
    https://www.linkedin.com/company/bitfarms/

    Forward-Looking Statements
    This news release contains certain “forward-looking information” and “forward-looking statements” (collectively, “forward-looking information”) that are based on expectations, estimates and projections as at the date of this news release and are covered by safe harbors under Canadian and United States securities laws. The statements and information in this release regarding potential purchases under the Program, growth opportunities and prospects for the Company, and other statements regarding future growth, plans and objectives of the Company are forward-looking information.

    Any statements that involve discussions with respect to predictions, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, assumptions, future events or performance (often but not always using phrases such as “expects”, or “does not expect”, “is expected”, “anticipates” or “does not anticipate”, “plans”, “budget”, “scheduled”, “forecasts”, “estimates”, “prospects”, “believes” or “intends” or variations of such words and phrases or stating that certain actions, events or results “may” or “could”, “would”, “might” or “will” be taken to occur or be achieved) are not statements of historical fact and may be forward-looking information. This forward-looking information is based on assumptions and estimates of management of Bitfarms at the time they were made, and involves known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance, or achievements of Bitfarms to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking information. Such factors, risks and uncertainties include, among others: an inability to apply the Company’s data centers to HPC/AI opportunities on a profitable basis; a failure to secure long-term contracts associated with HPC/AI customers on terms which are economic or at all; the construction and operation of new facilities may not occur as currently planned, or at all; expansion of existing facilities may not materialize as currently anticipated, or at all; an inability to satisfy the Panther Creek location related milestones which are conditions to loan drawdowns under the Macquarie Group financing facility; an inability to deploy the proceeds of the Macquarie Group financing facility to generate positive returns at the Panther Creek location; the construction and operation of new facilities may not occur as currently planned, or at all; expansion of existing facilities may not materialize as currently anticipated, or at all; new miners may not perform up to expectations; revenue may not increase as currently anticipated, or at all; the ongoing ability to successfully mine digital currency is not assured; failure of the equipment upgrades to be installed and operated as planned; the availability of additional power may not occur as currently planned, or at all; expansion may not materialize as currently anticipated, or at all; the power purchase agreements and economics thereof may not be as advantageous as expected; potential environmental cost and regulatory penalties due to the operation of the former Stronghold plants which entail environmental risk and certain additional risk factors particular to the former business and operations of Stronghold including, land reclamation requirements may be burdensome and expensive, changes in tax credits related to coal refuse power generation could have a material adverse effect on the business, financial condition, results of operations and future development efforts, competition in power markets may have a material adverse effect on the results of operations, cash flows and the market value of the assets, the business is subject to substantial energy regulation and may be adversely affected by legislative or regulatory changes, as well as liability under, or any future inability to comply with, existing or future energy regulations or requirements, the operations are subject to a number of risks arising out of the threat of climate change, and environmental laws, energy transitions policies and initiatives and regulations relating to emissions and coal residue management, which could result in increased operating and capital costs and reduce the extent of business activities, operation of power generation facilities involves significant risks and hazards customary to the power industry that could have a material adverse effect on our revenues and results of operations, and there may not have adequate insurance to cover these risks and hazards, employees, contractors, customers and the general public may be exposed to a risk of injury due to the nature of the operations, limited experience with carbon capture programs and initiatives and dependence on third-parties, including consultants, contractors and suppliers to develop and advance carbon capture programs and initiatives, and failure to properly manage these relationships, or the failure of these consultants, contractors and suppliers to perform as expected, could have a material adverse effect on the business, prospects or operations; the digital currency market; the ability to successfully mine digital currency; it may not be possible to profitably liquidate the current digital currency inventory, or at all; a decline in digital currency prices may have a significant negative impact on operations; an increase in network difficulty may have a significant negative impact on operations; the volatility of digital currency prices; the anticipated growth and sustainability of hydroelectricity for the purposes of cryptocurrency mining in the applicable jurisdictions; the inability to maintain reliable and economical sources of power to operate cryptocurrency mining assets; the risks of an increase in electricity costs, cost of natural gas, changes in currency exchange rates, energy curtailment or regulatory changes in the energy regimes in the jurisdictions in which Bitfarms operates and the potential adverse impact on profitability; future capital needs and the ability to complete current and future financings, including Bitfarms’ ability to utilize an at-the-market offering program ( “ATM Program”) and the prices at which securities may be sold in such ATM Program, as well as capital market conditions in general; share dilution resulting from an ATM Program and from other equity issuances; the risks of debt leverage and the ability to service and eventually repay the Macquarie Group financing facility; volatile securities markets impacting security pricing unrelated to operating performance; the risk that a material weakness in internal control over financial reporting could result in a misstatement of financial position that may lead to a material misstatement of the annual or interim consolidated financial statements if not prevented or detected on a timely basis; risks related to the Company ceasing to qualify as an “emerging growth company”; risks related to unsolicited investor interest, takeover proposals, shareholder activism or proxy contests relating to the election of directors; risks relating to lawsuits and other legal proceedings and challenges; historical prices of digital currencies and the ability to mine digital currencies that will be consistent with historical prices; and the adoption or expansion of any regulation or law that will prevent Bitfarms from operating its business, or make it more costly to do so. For further information concerning these and other risks and uncertainties, refer to Bitfarms’ filings on www.sedarplus.ca (which are also available on the website of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC“) at www.sec.gov), including the Company’s annual information form for the year ended December 31, 2024, management’s discussion & analysis for the year-ended December 31, 2024 and the management’s discussion and analysis for the three months ended March 31, 2025. Although Bitfarms has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in forward-looking statements, there may be other factors that cause results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended, including factors that are currently unknown to or deemed immaterial by Bitfarms. There can be no assurance that such statements will prove to be accurate as actual results, and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking information. Bitfarms does not undertake any obligation to revise or update any forward-looking information other than as required by law. Trading in the securities of the Company should be considered highly speculative. No stock exchange, securities commission or other regulatory authority has approved or disapproved the information contained herein. Neither the Toronto Stock Exchange, Nasdaq, or any other securities exchange or regulatory authority accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

    Investor Relations Contact:
    Laine Yonker
    lyonker@bitfarms.com

    Media Contact:
    Caroline Brady Baker
    cbaker@bitfarms.com

    The MIL Network –

    July 22, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: Old National Bancorp Reports Second Quarter 2025 Results and Names New President and COO

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    EVANSVILLE, Ind., July 22, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) —

    Old National Bancorp (NASDAQ: ONB) reports 2Q25 net income applicable to common shares of $121.4 million, diluted EPS of $0.34; $190.9 million and $0.53 on an adjusted1basis, respectively.


    CEO COMMENTARY
    :

    “Old National’s impressive second quarter results were achieved through a strong focus on the fundamentals: Growing our balance sheet, expanding our fee-based businesses, and controlling expenses,” said Chairman and CEO Jim Ryan. “Additionally, with the successful closing of our partnership with Bremer on May 1, 2025, Old National is well-positioned for the remainder of the year, benefiting from a larger balance sheet and a stronger capital position.”

    “We are thrilled to welcome Tim Burke as Old National’s President and Chief Operating Officer,” said Chairman and CEO Jim Ryan. “Tim brings nearly 30 years of extensive banking expertise to this critical role. I am confident that his infectious energy, strong strategic vision, and collaborative leadership approach will ensure that Old National continues to exceed client expectations for years to come, while also working to strengthen the communities we serve.”


    SECOND
    QUARTER HIGHLIGHTS2:

    Net Income
    • Net income applicable to common shares of $121.4 million; adjusted net income applicable to common shares1 of $190.9 million
    • Earnings per diluted common share (“EPS”) of $0.34; adjusted EPS1 of $0.53
       
    Net Interest Income/NIM
    • Net interest income on a fully taxable equivalent basis1 of $521.9 million
    • Net interest margin on a fully taxable equivalent basis1 (“NIM”) of 3.53%, up 26 basis points (“bps”)
       
    Operating Performance
    • Pre-provision net revenue1 (“PPNR”) of $269.6 million; adjusted PPNR1 of $289.9 million
    • Noninterest expense of $384.8 million; adjusted noninterest expense1 of $343.6 million
    • Efficiency ratio1 of 55.8%; adjusted efficiency ratio1 of 50.2%
       
    Deposits and Funding
    • Period-end total deposits of $54.4 billion, up $13.3 billion; core deposits up $11.6 billion
      • Period-end core deposits up 0.8% annualized excluding deposits assumed from Bremer Financial Corporation (“Bremer”)
    • Granular low-cost deposit franchise; total deposit costs of 193 bps, up 2 bps
       
    Loans and Credit Quality
    • End-of-period total loans3 of $48.0 billion, up $11.5 billion
      • End-of-period loans3 up 3.7% annualized excluding loans acquired from Bremer
    • Provision for credit losses4 (“provision”) of $106.8 million; $31.2 million excluding $75.6 million of current expected credit loss (“CECL”) Day 1 non-purchased credit deteriorated (“non-PCD”) provision expense5
    • Net charge-offs of $26.5 million, or 24 bps of average loans; 21 bps excluding purchased credit deteriorated (“PCD”) loans that had an allowance at acquisition
    • 30+ day delinquencies of 0.30% and nonaccrual loans of 1.24% of total loans
     
    Return Profile & Capital
    • Return on average tangible common equity1 (“ROATCE”) of 12.0%; adjusted ROATCE1 of 18.1%
    • Preliminary regulatory Tier 1 common equity to risk-weighted assets of 10.74%, down 88 bps
       
    Notable Items
    • Closing of Bremer partnership on May 1, 2025
    • $75.6 million of pre-tax CECL Day 1 non-PCD provision expense5
    • $41.2 million of pre-tax merger-related charges
    • $21.0 million of pre-tax pension plan gain6

    1 Non-GAAP financial measure that management believes is useful in evaluating the financial results of the Company – refer to the Non-GAAP reconciliations contained in this release 2 Comparisons are on a linked-quarter basis, unless otherwise noted 3 Includes loans held-for-sale 4 Includes the provision for unfunded commitments 5 Refers to the initial increase in allowance for credit losses required on acquired non-PCD loans, including unfunded loan commitments, through the provision for credit losses 6 Includes a gain associated with freezing benefits of the Bremer pension plan

    TIM BURKE TO JOIN OLD NATIONAL AS PRESIDENT AND COO
    Timothy M. Burke, Jr. will join Old National Bancorp (“Old National”) on July 22, 2025 as President and Chief Operating Officer, assuming the role previously held by Mark Sander who announced his retirement earlier this year. Mr. Burke most recently served as Executive Vice President of the Central Region and Field Enablement for the Commercial Bank for a large Midwestern super-regional bank, where he was responsible for the full range of commercial banking in 12 Midwestern markets including those in Illinois, Indiana and Michigan.

    Mr. Burke’s nearly 30-year banking career has centered on serving clients and communities in the Midwest. His prior leadership experience includes roles as Northeast Ohio Market President for the same regional institution, where he was responsible for driving collaboration across all business lines including Retail, Business Banking, Commercial, Private Banking and Mortgage.

    “I’m truly thrilled to join a team that’s so deeply committed to relationship banking and making a real impact on our communities,” said Burke. “Old National’s core values and mission strongly align with my personal values, positioning me well to jump into the role, take care of clients and deliver standout products and services consistently across all of our markets.”

    As President and COO, Burke will be responsible for guiding the success of Old National’s Commercial, Community and Wealth segments, and Credit and Marketing teams. He and his family will reside in Evansville, Ind., and he will maintain offices in Evansville and Chicago.

    RESULTS OF OPERATIONS2
    Old National Bancorp reported second quarter 2025 net income applicable to common shares of $121.4 million, or $0.34 per diluted common share.

    Included in second quarter results were $75.6 million of pre-tax CECL Day 1 non-PCD provision expense related to the allowance for credit losses established on acquired non-PCD loans (including unfunded loan commitments), pre-tax charges of $41.2 million for merger-related expenses, and a $21.0 million pre-tax gain associated with freezing benefits of the Bremer pension plan. Excluding these items and realized debt securities losses from the current quarter, adjusted net income1 was $190.9 million, or $0.53 per diluted common share.

    DEPOSITS AND FUNDING
    Growth in core deposits driven by Bremer including public fund and business checking increases partly offset by normal seasonal outflows of retail deposits.

    • Period-end total deposits were $54.4 billion, up $13.3 billion; core deposits up $11.6 billion; includes $11.5 billion of period-end core deposits assumed in the Bremer transaction.
      • Period-end core deposits up 0.8% annualized excluding Bremer.
    • On average, total deposits for the second quarter were $49.8 billion, up $9.3 billion.
    • Granular low-cost deposit franchise; total deposit costs of 193 bps, up 2 bps.
    • A loan to deposit ratio of 88%, combined with existing funding sources, provides strong liquidity.

    LOANS
    Loan growth driven by Bremer and strong commercial loan production; pipeline increasing.

    • Period-end total loans3 were $48.0 billion, up $11.5 billion; includes $11.2 billion of period end loans acquired in the Bremer transaction.
      • Excluding loans3 acquired in the Bremer transaction, period-end total loans were up 3.7% annualized.
    • Commercial loans, excluding Bremer, grew 4.6% annualized
      • Total commercial loan production in the second quarter was $2.3 billion; period-end commercial pipeline totaled $4.8 billion, up approximately 40%.
    • Average total loans in the second quarter were $44.1 billion, an increase of $7.8 billion.

    CREDIT QUALITY
    Resilient credit quality continues to be a hallmark of Old National.

    • Provision4 expense was $106.8 million; $31.2 million excluding $75.6 million of CECL Day 1 non-PCD provision expense5 related to the allowance for credit losses established on acquired non-PCD loans (including unfunded loan commitments) in the Bremer transaction, consistent with the prior quarter.
    • Net charge-offs were $26.5 million, or 24 bps of average loans, consistent with the prior quarter.
      • Excluding PCD loans that had an allowance for credit losses established at acquisition, net charge-offs to average loans were 21 bps.
    • 30+ day delinquencies as a percentage of loans were 0.30% compared to 0.22%.
    • Nonaccrual loans as a percentage of total loans were 1.24% compared to 1.29%.
    • The allowance for credit losses, including the allowance for credit losses on unfunded loan commitments, stood at $594.7 million, or 1.24% of total loans, compared to $424.0 million, or 1.16% of total loans, reflecting $75.6 million of CECL Day 1 non-PCD provision expense5 related to acquired non-PCD loans (including unfunded loan commitments) and $90.4 million of allowance related to acquired PCD loans.

    NET INTEREST INCOME AND MARGIN
    Higher reflective of larger balance sheet and higher asset yields.

    • Net interest income on a fully taxable equivalent basis1 increased to $521.9 million compared to $393.0 million, driven by Bremer, loan growth, higher asset yields and more days in the quarter, partly offset by higher funding costs.
    • Net interest margin on a fully taxable equivalent basis1 increased 26 bps to 3.53%.
    • Cost of total deposits was 1.93%, increasing 2 bps and the cost of total interest-bearing deposits increased 6 bps to 2.52%.

    NONINTEREST INCOME
    Increase driven by Bremer and organic growth of fee-based businesses.

    • Total noninterest income was $132.5 million, $111.6 million excluding a $21.0 million pre-tax gain associated with the freezing of benefits of the Bremer pension plan, compared to $93.8 million.
    • Excluding the pension plan gain and realized debt securities losses, noninterest income was up 18.8% driven by Bremer revenue as well as higher wealth fees, mortgage fees, and capital markets revenue.

    NONINTEREST EXPENSE
    Higher reflective of Bremer, disciplined expense management drives efficiency ratio lower.

    • Noninterest expense was $384.8 million and included $41.2 million of merger-related charges.
    • Excluding merger-related charges, adjusted noninterest expense1 was $343.6 million, compared to $262.6 million, driven primarily by elevated operating costs and additional intangibles amortization, both related to the Bremer transaction.
    • The efficiency ratio1 was 55.8%, while the adjusted efficiency ratio1 was 50.2% compared to 53.7% and 51.8%, respectively.

    INCOME TAXES

    • Income tax expense was $30.3 million, resulting in an effective tax rate of 19.5% compared to 20.3%. On an adjusted fully taxable equivalent (“FTE”) basis, the effective tax rate was 24.6% compared to 22.5%.
      • The effective tax rate for the second quarter of 2025 was impacted by the Bremer transaction and the first quarter of 2025 was impacted by a $1.2 million benefit for the vesting of employee stock compensation.
    • Income tax expense included $5.8 million of tax credit benefit compared to $5.3 million.

    CAPITAL
    Capital ratios remain strong.

    • Preliminary total risk-based capital down 109 bps to 12.59% and preliminary regulatory Tier 1 capital down 103 bps to 11.20%, as strong retained earnings were more than offset by the Bremer transaction and loan growth.
    • Tangible common equity to tangible assets was 7.26%, down 6.4%.

    CONFERENCE CALL AND WEBCAST
    Old National will host a conference call and live webcast at 9:00 a.m. Central Time on Tuesday, July 22, 2025, to review second quarter financial results. The live audio webcast link and corresponding presentation slides will be available on the Company’s Investor Relations website at oldnational.com and will be archived there for 12 months. To listen to the live conference call, dial U.S. (800) 715-9871 or International (646) 307-1963, access code 9394540. A replay of the call will also be available from approximately noon Central Time on July 22, 2025 through August 5, 2025. To access the replay, dial U.S. (800) 770-2030 or International (647) 362-9199; Access code 9394540.

    ABOUT OLD NATIONAL
    Old National Bancorp (NASDAQ: ONB) is the holding company of Old National Bank. As the fifth largest commercial bank headquartered in the Midwest, Old National proudly serves clients primarily in the Midwest and Southeast. With approximately $71 billion of assets and $38 billion of assets under management, Old National ranks among the top 25 banking companies headquartered in the United States. Tracing our roots to 1834, Old National focuses on building long-term, highly valued partnerships with clients while also strengthening and supporting the communities we serve. In addition to providing extensive services in consumer and commercial banking, Old National offers comprehensive wealth management and capital markets services. For more information and financial data, please visit Investor Relations at oldnational.com. In 2025, Points of Light named Old National one of “The Civic 50” – an honor reserved for the 50 most community-minded companies in the United States.

    USE OF NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES
    The Company’s accounting and reporting policies conform to U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) and general practices within the banking industry. As a supplement to GAAP, the Company provides non-GAAP performance results, which the Company believes are useful because they assist investors in assessing the Company’s operating performance. Where non-GAAP financial measures are used, the comparable GAAP financial measure, as well as the reconciliation to the comparable GAAP financial measure, can be found in the tables at the end of this release.

    The Company presents EPS, the efficiency ratio, return on average common equity, return on average tangible common equity, and net income applicable to common shares, all adjusted for certain notable items. These items include CECL Day 1 non-PCD provision expense, merger-related charges associated with completed and pending acquisitions, a pension plan gain, debt securities gains/losses, separation expense, distribution of excess pension assets expense, and FDIC special assessment expense. Management believes excluding these items from EPS, the efficiency ratio, return on average common equity, and return on average tangible common equity may be useful in assessing the Company’s underlying operational performance since these items do not pertain to its core business operations and their exclusion may facilitate better comparability between periods. Management believes that excluding merger-related charges from these metrics may be useful to the Company, as well as analysts and investors, since these expenses can vary significantly based on the size, type, and structure of each acquisition. Additionally, management believes excluding these items from these metrics may enhance comparability for peer comparison purposes.

    Income tax expense, provision for credit losses, and the certain notable items listed above are excluded from the calculation of pre-provision net revenues, adjusted due to the fluctuation in income before income tax and the level of provision for credit losses required. Management believes adjusted pre-provision net revenues may be useful in assessing the Company’s underlying operating performance and their exclusion may facilitate better comparability between periods and for peer comparison purposes.

    The Company presents adjusted noninterest expense, which excludes merger-related charges associated with completed and pending acquisitions, separation expense, distribution of excess pension assets expense, and FDIC special assessment expense, as well as adjusted noninterest income, which excludes a pension plan gain and debt securities gains/losses. Management believes that excluding these items from noninterest expense and noninterest income may be useful in assessing the Company’s underlying operational performance as these items either do not pertain to its core business operations or their exclusion may facilitate better comparability between periods and for peer comparison purposes.

    The tax-equivalent adjustment to net interest income and net interest margin recognizes the income tax savings when comparing taxable and tax-exempt assets. Interest income and yields on tax-exempt securities and loans are presented using the current federal income tax rate of 21%. Management believes that it is standard practice in the banking industry to present net interest income and net interest margin on a fully tax-equivalent basis and that it may enhance comparability for peer comparison purposes.

    In management’s view, tangible common equity measures are capital adequacy metrics that may be meaningful to the Company, as well as analysts and investors, in assessing the Company’s use of equity and in facilitating comparisons with peers. These non-GAAP measures are valuable indicators of a financial institution’s capital strength since they eliminate intangible assets from stockholders’ equity and retain the effect of accumulated other comprehensive loss in stockholders’ equity.

    Although intended to enhance investors’ understanding of the Company’s business and performance, these non-GAAP financial measures should not be considered an alternative to GAAP. In addition, these non-GAAP financial measures may differ from those used by other financial institutions to assess their business and performance. See the following reconciliations in the “Non-GAAP Reconciliations” section for details on the calculation of these measures to the extent presented herein.

    FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
    This earnings release contains certain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the “Act”), Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Rule 175 promulgated thereunder, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 3b-6 promulgated thereunder, notwithstanding that such statements are not specifically identified as such. In addition, certain statements may be contained in our future filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), in press releases, and in oral and written statements made by us that are not statements of historical fact and constitute forward‐looking statements within the meaning of the Act. These statements include, but are not limited to, descriptions of Old National’s financial condition, results of operations, asset and credit quality trends, profitability and business plans or opportunities. Forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “contemplate,” “continue,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “guidance,” “intend,” “may,” “outlook,” “plan,” “potential,” “predict,” “should,” “would,” and “will,” and other words of similar meaning. These forward-looking statements express management’s current expectations or forecasts of future events and, by their nature, are subject to risks and uncertainties. There are a number of factors that could cause actual results or outcomes to differ materially from those in such statements, including, but not limited to: competition; government legislation, regulations and policies, including trade and tariff policies; the ability of Old National to execute its business plan; unanticipated changes in our liquidity position, including but not limited to changes in our access to sources of liquidity and capital to address our liquidity needs; changes in economic conditions and economic and business uncertainty which could materially impact credit quality trends and the ability to generate loans and gather deposits; inflation and governmental responses to inflation, including increasing interest rates; market, economic, operational, liquidity, credit, and interest rate risks associated with our business; our ability to successfully manage our credit risk and the sufficiency of our allowance for credit losses; the expected cost savings, synergies and other financial benefits from the merger (the “Merger”) between Old National and Bremer not being realized within the expected time frames and costs or difficulties relating to integration matters being greater than expected; potential adverse reactions or changes to business or employee relationships, including those resulting from the completion of the Merger; the impact of purchase accounting with respect to the Merger, or any change in the assumptions used regarding the assets acquired and liabilities assumed to determine their fair value and credit marks; the potential impact of future business combinations on our performance and financial condition, including our ability to successfully integrate the businesses, the success of revenue-generating and cost reduction initiatives and the diversion of management’s attention from ongoing business operations and opportunities; failure or circumvention of our internal controls; operational risks or risk management failures by us or critical third parties, including without limitation with respect to data processing, information systems, cybersecurity, technological changes, vendor issues, business interruption, and fraud risks; significant changes in accounting, tax or regulatory practices or requirements; new legal obligations or liabilities; disruptive technologies in payment systems and other services traditionally provided by banks; failure or disruption of our information systems; computer hacking and other cybersecurity threats; the effects of climate change on Old National and its customers, borrowers, or service providers; the impacts of pandemics, epidemics and other infectious disease outbreaks; other matters discussed in this earnings release; and other factors identified in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024 and other filings with the SEC. These forward-looking statements are based on assumptions and estimates, which although believed to be reasonable, may turn out to be incorrect. Old National does not undertake an obligation to update these forward-looking statements to reflect events or conditions after the date of this earnings release. You are advised to consult further disclosures we may make on related subjects in our filings with the SEC.

    CONTACTS:    
    Media: Rick Jillson   Investors: Lynell Durchholz
    (812) 465-7267   (812) 464-1366
    Rick.Jillson@oldnational.com   Lynell.Durchholz@oldnational.com
                   
    Financial Highlights (unaudited)
    ($ and shares in thousands, except per share data)
                     
      Three Months Ended   Six Months Ended
      June 30, March 31, December 31, September 30, June 30,   June 30, June 30,
        2025     2025     2024     2024     2024       2025     2024  
    Income Statement                
    Net interest income $ 514,790   $ 387,643   $ 394,180   $ 391,724   $ 388,421     $ 902,433   $ 744,879  
    FTE adjustment1,3   7,063     5,360     5,777     6,144     6,340       12,423     12,593  
    Net interest income – tax equivalent basis3   521,853     393,003     399,957     397,868     394,761       914,856     757,472  
    Provision for credit losses   106,835     31,403     27,017     28,497     36,214       138,238     55,105  
    Noninterest income   132,517     93,794     95,766     94,138     87,271       226,311     164,793  
    Noninterest expense   384,766     268,471     276,824     272,283     282,999       653,237     545,316  
    Net income available to common shareholders $ 121,375   $ 140,625   $ 149,839   $ 139,768   $ 117,196     $ 262,000   $ 233,446  
    Per Common Share Data                
    Weighted average diluted shares   361,436     321,016     318,803     317,331     316,461       340,250     304,207  
    EPS, diluted $ 0.34   $ 0.44   $ 0.47   $ 0.44   $ 0.37     $ 0.77   $ 0.77  
    Cash dividends   0.14     0.14     0.14     0.14     0.14       0.28     0.28  
    Dividend payout ratio2   41 %   32 %   30 %   32 %   38 %     36 %   36 %
    Book value $ 20.12   $ 19.71   $ 19.11   $ 19.20   $ 18.28     $ 20.12   $ 18.28  
    Stock price   21.34     21.19     21.71     18.66     17.19       21.34     17.19  
    Tangible book value3   12.60     12.54     11.91     11.97     11.05       12.60     11.05  
    Performance Ratios                
    ROAA   0.77 %   1.08 %   1.14 %   1.08 %   0.92 %     0.91 %   0.95 %
    ROAE   6.7 %   9.1 %   9.8 %   9.4 %   8.2 %     7.8 %   8.4 %
    ROATCE3   12.0 %   15.0 %   16.4 %   16.0 %   14.1 %     13.4 %   14.5 %
    NIM (FTE)3   3.53 %   3.27 %   3.30 %   3.32 %   3.33 %     3.41 %   3.31 %
    Efficiency ratio3   55.8 %   53.7 %   54.4 %   53.8 %   57.2 %     54.9 %   57.7 %
    NCOs to average loans   0.24 %   0.24 %   0.21 %   0.19 %   0.16 %     0.24 %   0.15 %
    ACL on loans to EOP loans   1.18 %   1.10 %   1.08 %   1.05 %   1.01 %     1.18 %   1.01 %
    ACL4 to EOP loans   1.24 %   1.16 %   1.14 %   1.12 %   1.08 %     1.24 %   1.08 %
    NPLs to EOP loans   1.24 %   1.29 %   1.23 %   1.22 %   0.94 %     1.24 %   0.94 %
    Balance Sheet (EOP)                
    Total loans $ 47,902,819   $ 36,413,944   $ 36,285,887   $ 36,400,643   $ 36,150,513     $ 47,902,819   $ 36,150,513  
    Total assets   70,979,805     53,877,944     53,552,272     53,602,293     53,119,645       70,979,805     53,119,645  
    Total deposits   54,357,683     41,034,572     40,823,560     40,845,746     39,999,228       54,357,683     39,999,228  
    Total borrowed funds   7,346,098     5,447,054     5,411,537     5,449,096     6,085,204       7,346,098     6,085,204  
    Total shareholders’ equity   8,126,387     6,534,654     6,340,350     6,367,298     6,075,072       8,126,387     6,075,072  
    Capital Ratios3                
    Risk-based capital ratios (EOP):                
    Tier 1 common equity   10.74 %   11.62 %   11.38 %   11.00 %   10.73 %     10.74 %   10.73 %
    Tier 1 capital   11.20 %   12.23 %   11.98 %   11.60 %   11.33 %     11.20 %   11.33 %
    Total capital   12.59 %   13.68 %   13.37 %   12.94 %   12.71 %     12.59 %   12.71 %
    Leverage ratio (average assets)   9.26 %   9.44 %   9.21 %   9.05 %   8.90 %     9.26 %   8.90 %
    Equity to assets (averages)   11.38 %   12.01 %   11.78 %   11.60 %   11.31 %     11.66 %   11.31 %
    TCE to TA   7.26 %   7.76 %   7.41 %   7.44 %   6.94 %     7.26 %   6.94 %
    Nonfinancial Data                
    Full-time equivalent employees   5,313     4,028     4,066     4,105     4,267       5,313     4,267  
    Banking centers   351     280     280     280     280       351     280  
    1 Calculated using the federal statutory tax rate in effect of 21% for all periods.          
    2 Cash dividends per common share divided by net income per common share (basic).          
    3 Represents a non-GAAP financial measure. Refer to the “Non-GAAP Measures” table for reconciliations to GAAP financial measures.
        June 30, 2025 capital ratios are preliminary.
         
    4 Includes the allowance for credit losses on loans and unfunded loan commitments.          
                     
    FTE – Fully taxable equivalent basis ROAA – Return on average assets ROAE – Return on average equity ROATCE – Return on average tangible common equity NCOs – Net Charge-offs ACL – Allowance for Credit Losses EOP – End of period actual balances NPLs – Non-performing Loans TCE – Tangible common equity TA – Tangible assets      
                     
    Income Statement (unaudited)
    ($ and shares in thousands, except per share data)
      Three Months Ended   Six Months Ended
      June 30, March 31, December 31, September 30, June 30,   June 30, June 30,
        2025     2025     2024     2024     2024       2025     2024  
    Interest income $ 824,961   $ 630,399   $ 662,082   $ 679,925   $ 663,663     $ 1,455,360   $ 1,259,644  
    Less: interest expense   310,171     242,756     267,902     288,201     275,242       552,927     514,765  
    Net interest income   514,790     387,643     394,180     391,724     388,421       902,433     744,879  
    Provision for credit losses   106,835     31,403     27,017     28,497     36,214       138,238     55,105  
    Net interest income
    after provision for credit losses
      407,955     356,240     367,163     363,227     352,207       764,195     689,774  
    Wealth and investment services fees   35,817     29,648     30,012     29,117     29,358       65,465     57,662  
    Service charges on deposit accounts   23,878     21,156     20,577     20,350     19,350       45,034     37,248  
    Debit card and ATM fees   12,922     9,991     10,991     11,362     10,993       22,913     21,047  
    Mortgage banking revenue   10,032     6,879     7,026     7,669     7,064       16,911     11,542  
    Capital markets income   7,114     4,506     5,244     7,426     4,729       11,620     7,629  
    Company-owned life insurance   6,625     5,381     6,499     5,315     5,739       12,006     9,173  
    Other income   36,170     16,309     15,539     12,975     10,036       52,479     20,506  
    Debt securities gains (losses), net   (41 )   (76 )   (122 )   (76 )   2       (117 )   (14 )
    Total noninterest income   132,517     93,794     95,766     94,138     87,271       226,311     164,793  
    Salaries and employee benefits   202,112     148,305     146,605     147,494     159,193       350,417     308,996  
    Occupancy   30,432     29,053     29,733     27,130     26,547       59,485     53,566  
    Equipment   12,566     8,901     9,325     9,888     8,704       21,467     17,375  
    Marketing   13,759     11,940     12,653     11,036     11,284       25,699     21,918  
    Technology   31,452     22,020     21,429     23,343     24,002       53,472     44,025  
    Communication   5,014     4,134     4,176     4,681     4,480       9,148     8,480  
    Professional fees   21,931     7,919     11,055     7,278     10,552       29,850     16,958  
    FDIC assessment   13,409     9,700     11,970     11,722     9,676       23,109     20,989  
    Amortization of intangibles   19,630     6,830     7,237     7,411     7,425       26,460     12,880  
    Amortization of tax credit investments   5,815     3,424     4,556     3,277     2,747       9,239     5,496  
    Other expense   28,646     16,245     18,085     19,023     18,389       44,891     34,633  
    Total noninterest expense   384,766     268,471     276,824     272,283     282,999       653,237     545,316  
    Income before income taxes   155,706     181,563     186,105     185,082     156,479       337,269     309,251  
    Income tax expense   30,298     36,904     32,232     41,280     35,250       67,202     67,738  
    Net income $ 125,408   $ 144,659   $ 153,873   $ 143,802   $ 121,229     $ 270,067   $ 241,513  
    Preferred dividends   (4,033 )   (4,034 )   (4,034 )   (4,034 )   (4,033 )     (8,067 )   (8,067 )
    Net income applicable to common shares $ 121,375   $ 140,625   $ 149,839   $ 139,768   $ 117,196     $ 262,000   $ 233,446  
                     
    EPS, diluted $ 0.34   $ 0.44   $ 0.47   $ 0.44   $ 0.37     $ 0.77   $ 0.77  
    Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding                
    Basic   360,155     315,925     315,673     315,622     315,585       338,162     303,283  
    Diluted   361,436     321,016     318,803     317,331     316,461       340,250     304,207  
    (EOP)   391,818     319,236     318,980     318,955     318,969       391,818     318,969  
                     
                     
     
    End of Period Balance Sheet (unaudited)
    ($ in thousands)
      June 30, March 31, December 31, September 30, June 30,
        2025     2025     2024     2024     2024  
    Assets          
    Cash and due from banks $ 637,556   $ 486,061   $ 394,450   $ 498,120   $ 428,665  
    Money market and other interest-earning investments   1,171,015     753,719     833,518     693,450     804,381  
    Investments:          
    Treasury and government-sponsored agencies   2,445,733     2,364,170     2,289,903     2,335,716     2,207,004  
    Mortgage-backed securities   9,632,206     6,458,023     6,175,103     6,085,826     5,890,371  
    States and political subdivisions   1,590,272     1,589,555     1,637,379     1,665,128     1,678,597  
    Other securities   852,687     755,348     781,656     783,079     775,623  
    Total investments   14,520,898     11,167,096     10,884,041     10,869,749     10,551,595  
    Loans held-for-sale, at fair value   77,618     40,424     34,483     62,376     66,126  
    Loans:          
    Commercial   14,662,916     10,650,615     10,288,560     10,408,095     10,332,631  
    Commercial and agriculture real estate   21,879,785     16,135,327     16,307,486     16,356,216     16,016,958  
    Residential real estate   8,212,242     6,771,694     6,797,586     6,757,896     6,894,957  
    Consumer   3,147,876     2,856,308     2,892,255     2,878,436     2,905,967  
    Total loans   47,902,819     36,413,944     36,285,887     36,400,643     36,150,513  
    Allowance for credit losses on loans   (565,109 )   (401,932 )   (392,522 )   (380,840 )   (366,335 )
    Premises and equipment, net   682,539     584,664     588,970     599,528     601,945  
    Goodwill and other intangible assets   2,944,372     2,289,268     2,296,098     2,305,084     2,306,204  
    Company-owned life insurance   1,046,693     859,211     859,851     863,723     862,032  
    Accrued interest receivable and other assets   2,561,404     1,685,489     1,767,496     1,690,460     1,714,519  
    Total assets $ 70,979,805   $ 53,877,944   $ 53,552,272   $ 53,602,293   $ 53,119,645  
               
    Liabilities and Equity          
    Noninterest-bearing demand deposits $ 12,652,556   $ 9,186,314   $ 9,399,019   $ 9,429,285   $ 9,336,042  
    Interest-bearing:          
    Checking and NOW accounts   9,194,738     7,736,014     7,538,987     7,314,245     7,680,865  
    Savings accounts   5,058,819     4,715,329     4,753,279     4,781,447     4,983,811  
    Money market accounts   16,564,125     11,638,653     11,807,228     11,601,461     10,485,491  
    Other time deposits   7,613,377     6,212,898     5,819,970     6,010,070     5,688,432  
    Total core deposits   51,083,615     39,489,208     39,318,483     39,136,508     38,174,641  
    Brokered deposits   3,274,068     1,545,364     1,505,077     1,709,238     1,824,587  
    Total deposits   54,357,683     41,034,572     40,823,560     40,845,746     39,999,228  
               
    Federal funds purchased and interbank borrowings   340,246     170     385     135,263     250,154  
    Securities sold under agreements to repurchase   297,637     290,256     268,975     244,626     240,713  
    Federal Home Loan Bank advances   5,835,918     4,514,354     4,452,559     4,471,153     4,744,560  
    Other borrowings   872,297     642,274     689,618     598,054     849,777  
    Total borrowed funds   7,346,098     5,447,054     5,411,537     5,449,096     6,085,204  
    Accrued expenses and other liabilities   1,149,637     861,664     976,825     940,153     960,141  
    Total liabilities   62,853,418     47,343,290     47,211,922     47,234,995     47,044,573  
    Preferred stock, common stock, surplus, and retained earnings   8,725,995     7,183,163     7,086,393     6,971,054     6,866,480  
    Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax   (599,608 )   (648,509 )   (746,043 )   (603,756 )   (791,408 )
    Total shareholders’ equity   8,126,387     6,534,654     6,340,350     6,367,298     6,075,072  
    Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity $ 70,979,805   $ 53,877,944   $ 53,552,272   $ 53,602,293   $ 53,119,645  
     
                             
    Average Balance Sheet and Interest Rates (unaudited)
    ($ in thousands)
                             
                             
        Three Months Ended   Three Months Ended   Three Months Ended
        June 30, 2025   March 31, 2025   June 30, 2024
        Average Income1/ Yield/   Average Income1/ Yield/   Average Income1/ Yield/
    Earning Assets:   Balance Expense Rate   Balance Expense Rate   Balance Expense Rate
    Money market and other interest-earning investments   $ 1,424,700   $ 14,791 4.16 %   $ 791,067   $ 8,815 4.52 %   $ 814,944   $ 11,311 5.58 %
    Investments:                        
    Treasury and government-sponsored agencies     2,396,691     20,820 3.47 %     2,318,869     20,019 3.45 %     2,208,935     21,531 3.90 %
    Mortgage-backed securities     8,567,318     87,734 4.10 %     6,287,825     54,523 3.47 %     5,828,225     47,904 3.29 %
    States and political subdivisions     1,596,899     13,402 3.36 %     1,610,819     13,242 3.29 %     1,686,994     14,290 3.39 %
    Other securities     970,581     15,770 6.50 %     770,839     10,512 5.45 %     788,571     12,583 6.38 %
    Total investments     13,531,489     137,726 4.07 %     10,988,352     98,296 3.58 %     10,512,725     96,308 3.66 %
    Loans:2                        
    Commercial     13,240,876     219,446 6.63 %     10,397,991     165,595 6.37 %     10,345,098     183,425 7.09 %
    Commercial and agriculture real estate     20,022,403     316,422 6.32 %     16,213,606     245,935 6.07 %     15,870,809     260,407 6.56 %
    Residential real estate loans     7,792,440     88,852 4.56 %     6,815,091     67,648 3.97 %     6,952,942     67,683 3.89 %
    Consumer     3,049,341     54,787 7.21 %     2,871,213     49,470 6.99 %     2,910,331     50,869 7.03 %
    Total loans     44,105,060     679,507 6.16 %     36,297,901     528,648 5.83 %     36,079,180     562,384 6.24 %
                             
    Total earning assets   $ 59,061,249   $ 832,024 5.64 %   $ 48,077,320   $ 635,759 5.30 %   $ 47,406,849   $ 670,003 5.66 %
                             
    Less: Allowance for credit losses on loans     (404,871 )         (398,765 )         (331,043 )    
                             
    Non-earning Assets:                        
    Cash and due from banks   $ 426,513         $ 372,428         $ 430,256      
    Other assets     6,403,239           5,394,600           5,341,022      
                             
    Total assets   $ 65,486,130         $ 53,445,583         $ 52,847,084      
                             
    Interest-Bearing Liabilities:                        
    Checking and NOW accounts   $ 8,594,591   $ 29,291 1.37 %   $ 7,526,294   $ 23,850 1.29 %   $ 8,189,454   $ 34,398 1.69 %
    Savings accounts     4,968,232     3,777 0.30 %     4,692,239     3,608 0.31 %     5,044,800     5,254 0.42 %
    Money market accounts     15,055,735     110,933 2.96 %     11,664,650     88,381 3.07 %     10,728,156     102,560 3.84 %
    Other time deposits     7,092,124     67,204 3.80 %     5,996,108     56,485 3.82 %     5,358,103     56,586 4.25 %
    Total interest-bearing core deposits     35,710,682     211,205 2.37 %     29,879,291     172,324 2.34 %     29,320,513     198,798 2.73 %
    Brokered deposits     2,530,726     28,883 4.58 %     1,546,756     18,171 4.76 %     1,244,237     17,008 5.50 %
    Total interest-bearing deposits     38,241,408     240,088 2.52 %     31,426,047     190,495 2.46 %     30,564,750     215,806 2.84 %
                             
    Federal funds purchased and interbank borrowings     88,603     953 4.31 %     148,130     1,625 4.45 %     148,835     1,986 5.37 %
    Securities sold under agreements to repurchase     295,948     636 0.86 %     272,961     551 0.82 %     249,939     639 1.03 %
    Federal Home Loan Bank advances     6,037,462     59,042 3.92 %     4,464,590     41,896 3.81 %     4,473,978     44,643 4.01 %
    Other borrowings     828,214     9,452 4.58 %     675,759     8,189 4.91 %     891,609     12,168 5.49 %
    Total borrowed funds     7,250,227     70,083 3.88 %     5,561,440     52,261 3.81 %     5,764,361     59,436 4.15 %
                             
    Total interest-bearing liabilities   $ 45,491,635   $ 310,171 2.73 %   $ 36,987,487   $ 242,756 2.66 %   $ 36,329,111   $ 275,242 3.05 %
                             
    Noninterest-Bearing Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity                      
    Demand deposits   $ 11,568,854         $ 9,096,676         $ 9,558,675      
    Other liabilities     973,525           944,935           980,322      
    Shareholders’ equity     7,452,116           6,416,485           5,978,976      
                             
    Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity   $ 65,486,130         $ 53,445,583         $ 52,847,084      
                             
    Net interest rate spread       2.91 %       2.64 %       2.61 %
                             
    Net interest margin (GAAP)       3.49 %       3.23 %       3.28 %
                             
    Net interest margin (FTE)3       3.53 %       3.27 %       3.33 %
                             
    FTE adjustment     $ 7,063       $ 5,360       $ 6,340  
                             
    1 Interest income is reflected on a FTE basis.  
    2 Includes loans held-for-sale.  
    3 Represents a non-GAAP financial measure. Refer to the “Non-GAAP Measures” table for reconciliations to GAAP financial measures.  
     
                     
    Average Balance Sheet and Interest Rates (unaudited)
    ($ in thousands)
                     
                     
        Six Months Ended   Six Months Ended
        June 30, 2025   June 30, 2024
        Average Income1/ Yield/   Average Income1/ Yield/
    Earning Assets:   Balance Expense Rate   Balance Expense Rate
    Money market and other interest-earning investments   $ 1,109,634   $ 23,606 4.29 %   $ 786,094   $ 21,296 5.45 %
    Investments:                
    Treasury and government-sponsored agencies     2,357,995     40,839 3.46 %     2,285,706     44,797 3.92 %
    Mortgage-backed securities     7,433,868     142,257 3.83 %     5,592,655     86,792 3.10 %
    States and political subdivisions     1,603,821     26,644 3.32 %     1,683,585     28,266 3.36 %
    Other securities     871,262     26,282 6.03 %     779,504     24,756 6.35 %
    Total investments   $ 12,266,946   $ 236,022 3.85 %   $ 10,341,450   $ 184,611 3.57 %
    Loans:2                
    Commercial     11,827,287     385,041 6.51 %     9,942,741     350,688 7.05 %
    Commercial and agriculture real estate     18,128,526     562,357 6.20 %     15,119,590     490,493 6.49 %
    Residential real estate loans     7,306,465     156,500 4.28 %     6,823,378     130,686 3.83 %
    Consumer     2,960,769     104,257 7.10 %     2,777,711     94,463 6.84 %
    Total loans     40,223,047     1,208,155 6.01 %     34,663,420     1,066,330 6.16 %
                     
    Total earning assets   $ 53,599,627   $ 1,467,783 5.48 %   $ 45,790,964   $ 1,272,237 5.56 %
                     
    Less: Allowance for credit losses on loans     (401,835 )         (322,256 )    
                     
    Non-earning Assets:                
    Cash and due from banks   $ 399,620         $ 396,466      
    Other assets     5,901,705           5,151,308      
                     
    Total assets   $ 59,499,117         $ 51,016,482      
                     
    Interest-Bearing Liabilities:                
    Checking and NOW accounts   $ 8,063,393   $ 53,141 1.33 %   $ 7,665,327   $ 59,650 1.56 %
    Savings accounts     4,830,998     7,385 0.31 %     5,035,100     10,271 0.41 %
    Money market accounts     13,369,560     199,314 3.01 %     10,322,808     196,773 3.83 %
    Other time deposits     6,547,143     123,689 3.81 %     5,023,620     104,018 4.16 %
    Total interest-bearing core deposits     32,811,094     383,529 2.36 %     28,046,855     370,712 2.66 %
    Brokered deposits     2,041,459     47,054 4.65 %     1,145,744     30,533 5.36 %
    Total interest-bearing deposits     34,852,553     430,583 2.49 %     29,192,599     401,245 2.76 %
                     
    Federal funds purchased and interbank borrowings     118,202     2,578 4.40 %     108,962     2,947 5.44 %
    Securities sold under agreements to repurchase     284,518     1,187 0.84 %     273,088     1,556 1.15 %
    Federal Home Loan Bank advances     5,255,372     100,938 3.87 %     4,430,236     85,810 3.90 %
    Other borrowings     752,408     17,641 4.73 %     858,727     23,207 5.43 %
    Total borrowed funds     6,410,500     122,344 3.85 %     5,671,013     113,520 4.03 %
                     
    Total interest-bearing liabilities     41,263,053     552,927 2.70 %     34,863,612     514,765 2.97 %
                     
    Noninterest-Bearing Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity              
    Demand deposits   $ 10,339,594         $ 9,408,406      
    Other liabilities     959,309           972,205      
    Shareholders’ equity     6,937,161           5,772,259      
                     
    Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity   $ 59,499,117         $ 51,016,482      
                     
    Net interest rate spread       2.78 %       2.59 %
                     
    Net interest margin (GAAP)       3.37 %       3.25 %
                     
    Net interest margin (FTE)3       3.41 %       3.31 %
                     
    FTE adjustment     $ 12,423       $ 12,593  
                     
    1 Interest income is reflected on a FTE.
    2 Includes loans held-for-sale.                
    3 Represents a non-GAAP financial measure. Refer to the “Non-GAAP Measures” table for reconciliations to GAAP financial measures.    
     
                     
    Asset Quality (EOP) (unaudited)
    ($ in thousands)
                     
      Three Months Ended   Six Months Ended
      June 30, March 31, December 31, September 30, June 30,   June 30, June 30,
        2025     2025     2024     2024     2024       2025     2024  
    Allowance for credit losses:                
    Beginning allowance for credit losses on loans $ 401,932   $ 392,522   $ 380,840   $ 366,335   $ 319,713     $ 392,522   $ 307,610  
    Allowance established for acquired PCD loans   90,442     —     —     2,803     23,922       90,442     23,922  
    Provision for credit losses on loans   99,263     31,026     30,417     29,176     36,745       130,289     60,598  
    Gross charge-offs   (29,954 )   (24,540 )   (21,278 )   (18,965 )   (17,041 )     (54,494 )   (31,061 )
    Gross recoveries   3,426     2,924     2,543     1,491     2,996       6,350     5,266  
    NCOs   (26,528 )   (21,616 )   (18,735 )   (17,474 )   (14,045 )     (48,144 )   (25,795 )
    Ending allowance for credit losses on loans $ 565,109   $ 401,932   $ 392,522   $ 380,840   $ 366,335     $ 565,109   $ 366,335  
    Beginning allowance for credit losses on unfunded commitments $ 22,031   $ 21,654   $ 25,054   $ 25,733   $ 26,264     $ 21,654   $ 31,226  
    Provision (release) for credit losses on unfunded commitments   7,572     377     (3,400 )   (679 )   (531 )     7,949     (5,493 )
    Ending allowance for credit losses on unfunded commitments $ 29,603   $ 22,031   $ 21,654   $ 25,054   $ 25,733     $ 29,603   $ 25,733  
    Allowance for credit losses $ 594,712   $ 423,963   $ 414,176   $ 405,894   $ 392,068     $ 594,712   $ 392,068  
    Provision for credit losses on loans $ 99,263   $ 31,026   $ 30,417   $ 29,176   $ 36,745     $ 130,289   $ 60,598  
    Provision (release) for credit losses on unfunded commitments   7,572     377     (3,400 )   (679 )   (531 )     7,949     (5,493 )
    Provision for credit losses $ 106,835   $ 31,403   $ 27,017   $ 28,497   $ 36,214     $ 138,238   $ 55,105  
    NCOs / average loans1   0.24 %   0.24 %   0.21 %   0.19 %   0.16 %     0.24 %   0.15 %
    Average loans1 $ 44,075,472   $ 36,284,059   $ 36,410,414   $ 36,299,544   $ 36,053,845     $ 40,201,289   $ 34,648,292  
    EOP loans1   47,902,819     36,413,944     36,285,887     36,400,643     36,150,513       47,902,819     36,150,513  
    ACL on loans / EOP loans1   1.18 %   1.10 %   1.08 %   1.05 %   1.01 %     1.18 %   1.01 %
    ACL / EOP loans1   1.24 %   1.16 %   1.14 %   1.12 %   1.08 %     1.24 %   1.08 %
    Underperforming Assets:                
    Loans 90 days and over (still accruing) $ 16,893   $ 6,757   $ 4,060   $ 1,177   $ 5,251     $ 16,893   $ 5,251  
    Nonaccrual loans   594,709     469,211     447,979     443,597     340,181       594,709     340,181  
    Foreclosed assets   7,986     6,301     4,294     4,077     8,290       7,986     8,290  
    Total underperforming assets $ 619,588   $ 482,269   $ 456,333   $ 448,851   $ 353,722     $ 619,588   $ 353,722  
    Classified and Criticized Assets:                
    Nonaccrual loans $ 594,709   $ 469,211   $ 447,979   $ 443,597   $ 340,181     $ 594,709   $ 340,181  
    Substandard loans (still accruing)   1,969,260     1,479,630     1,073,413     1,074,243     841,087       1,969,260     841,087  
    Loans 90 days and over (still accruing)   16,893     6,757     4,060     1,177     5,251       16,893     5,251  
    Total classified loans – “problem loans”   2,580,862     1,955,598     1,525,452     1,519,017     1,186,519       2,580,862     1,186,519  
    Other classified assets   43,495     53,239     58,954     59,485     60,772       43,495     60,772  
    Special Mention   1,008,716     828,314     908,630     837,543     967,655       1,008,716     967,655  
    Total classified and criticized assets $ 3,633,073   $ 2,837,151   $ 2,493,036   $ 2,416,045   $ 2,214,946     $ 3,633,073   $ 2,214,946  
    Loans 30-89 days past due (still accruing) $ 128,771   $ 72,517   $ 93,141   $ 91,750   $ 51,712     $ 128,771   $ 51,712  
    Nonaccrual loans / EOP loans1   1.24 %   1.29 %   1.23 %   1.22 %   0.94 %     1.24 %   0.94 %
    ACL / nonaccrual loans   100 %   90 %   92 %   92 %   115 %     100 %   115 %
    Under-performing assets/EOP loans1   1.29 %   1.32 %   1.26 %   1.23 %   0.98 %     1.29 %   0.98 %
    Under-performing assets/EOP assets   0.87 %   0.90 %   0.85 %   0.84 %   0.67 %     0.87 %   0.67 %
    30+ day delinquencies/EOP loans1   0.30 %   0.22 %   0.27 %   0.26 %   0.16 %     0.30 %   0.16 %
                     
    1 Excludes loans held-for-sale.            
                     
                     
    Non-GAAP Measures (unaudited)
    ($ and shares in thousands, except per share data)
                     
      Three Months Ended   Six Months Ended
      June 30, March 31, December 31, September 30, June 30,   June 30, June 30,
        2025     2025     2024     2024     2024       2025     2024  
    Earnings Per Share:                
    Net income applicable to common shares $ 121,375   $ 140,625   $ 149,839   $ 139,768   $ 117,196     $ 262,000   $ 233,446  
    Adjustments:                
    CECL Day 1 non-PCD provision expense   75,604     —     —     —     15,312       75,604     15,312  
    Tax effect1   (20,802 )   —     —     —     (3,476 )     (20,802 )   (3,476 )
    CECL Day 1 non-PCD provision expense, net   54,802     —     —     —     11,836       54,802     11,836  
    Merger-related charges   41,206     5,856     8,117     6,860     19,440       47,062     22,348  
    Tax effect1   (11,337 )   (1,089 )   (2,058 )   (1,528 )   (4,413 )     (12,426 )   (5,123 )
    Merger-related charges, net   29,869     4,767     6,059     5,332     15,027       34,636     17,225  
    Pension plan gain   (21,001 )   —     —     —     —       (21,001 )   —  
    Tax effect1   5,778     —     —     —     —       5,778     —  
    Pension plan gain, net   (15,223 )   —     —     —     —       (15,223 )   —  
    Debt securities (gains) losses   41     76     122     76     (2 )     117     14  
    Tax effect1   (11 )   (14 )   (31 )   (17 )   1       (25 )   (3 )
    Debt securities (gains) losses, net   30     62     91     59     (1 )     92     11  
    Separation expense   —     —     —     2,646     —       —     —  
    Tax effect1   —     —     —     (589 )   —       —     —  
    Separation expense, net   —     —     —     2,057     —       —     —  
    Distribution of excess pension assets   —     —     —     —     —   —   —     13,318  
    Tax effect1   —     —     —     —     —   —   —     (3,250 )
    Distribution excess pension assets, net   —     —     —     —     —       —     10,068  
    FDIC special assessment   —     —     —     —     —       —     2,994  
    Tax effect1   —     —     —     —     —       —     (731 )
    FDIC special assessment, net   —     —     —     —     —       —     2,263  
    Total adjustments, net   69,478     4,829     6,150     7,448     26,862       74,307     41,403  
    Net income applicable to common shares, adjusted $ 190,853   $ 145,454   $ 155,989   $ 147,216   $ 144,058     $ 336,307   $ 274,849  
    Weighted average diluted common shares outstanding   361,436     321,016     318,803     317,331     316,461       340,250     304,207  
    EPS, diluted $ 0.34   $ 0.44   $ 0.47   $ 0.44   $ 0.37     $ 0.77   $ 0.77  
    Adjusted EPS, diluted $ 0.53   $ 0.45   $ 0.49   $ 0.46   $ 0.46     $ 0.99   $ 0.90  
    NIM:                
    Net interest income $ 514,790   $ 387,643   $ 394,180   $ 391,724   $ 388,421     $ 902,433   $ 744,879  
    Add: FTE adjustment2   7,063     5,360     5,777     6,144     6,340       12,423     12,593  
    Net interest income (FTE) $ 521,853   $ 393,003   $ 399,957   $ 397,868   $ 394,761     $ 914,856   $ 757,472  
    Average earning assets $ 59,061,249   $ 48,077,320   $ 48,411,803   $ 47,905,463   $ 47,406,849     $ 53,599,627   $ 45,790,964  
    NIM (GAAP)   3.49 %   3.23 %   3.26 %   3.27 %   3.28 %     3.37 %   3.25 %
    NIM (FTE)   3.53 %   3.27 %   3.30 %   3.32 %   3.33 %     3.41 %   3.31 %
                     
    Refer to last page of Non-GAAP reconciliations for footnotes.            
                     
                     
    Non-GAAP Measures (unaudited)
    ($ in thousands)
                     
      Three Months Ended   Six Months Ended
      June 30, March 31, December 31, September 30, June 30,   June 30, June 30,
        2025     2025     2024     2024     2024       2025     2024  
    PPNR:                
    Net interest income (FTE)2 $ 521,853   $ 393,003   $ 399,957   $ 397,868   $ 394,761     $ 914,856   $ 757,472  
    Add: Noninterest income   132,517     93,794     95,766     94,138     87,271       226,311     164,793  
    Total revenue (FTE)   654,370     486,797     495,723     492,006     482,032       1,141,167     922,265  
    Less: Noninterest expense   (384,766 )   (268,471 )   (276,824 )   (272,283 )   (282,999 )     (653,237 )   (545,316 )
    PPNR $ 269,604   $ 218,326   $ 218,899   $ 219,723   $ 199,033     $ 487,930   $ 376,949  
    Adjustments:                
    Pension plan termination gain $ (21,001 ) $ —   $ —   $ —   $ —     $ (21,001 ) $ —  
    Debt securities (gains) losses $ 41   $ 76   $ 122   $ 76   $ (2 )   $ 117   $ 14  
    Noninterest income adjustments   (20,960 )   76     122     76     (2 )     (20,884 )   14  
    Adjusted noninterest income   111,557     93,870     95,888     94,214     87,269       205,427     164,807  
    Adjusted revenue $ 633,410   $ 486,873   $ 495,845   $ 492,082   $ 482,030     $ 1,120,283   $ 922,279  
    Adjustments:                
    Merger-related charges $ 41,206   $ 5,856   $ 8,117   $ 6,860   $ 19,440     $ 47,062   $ 22,348  
    Separation expense   —     —     —     2,646     —       —     —  
    Distribution of excess pension assets   —     —     —     —     —       —     13,318  
    FDIC Special Assessment   —     —     —     —     —       —     2,994  
    Noninterest expense adjustments   41,206     5,856     8,117     9,506     19,440       47,062     38,660  
    Adjusted total noninterest expense   (343,560 )   (262,615 )   (268,707 )   (262,777 )   (263,559 )     (606,175 )   (506,656 )
    Adjusted PPNR $ 289,850   $ 224,258   $ 227,138   $ 229,305   $ 218,471     $ 514,108   $ 415,623  
    Efficiency Ratio:                
    Noninterest expense $ 384,766   $ 268,471   $ 276,824   $ 272,283   $ 282,999     $ 653,237   $ 545,316  
    Less: Amortization of intangibles   (19,630 )   (6,830 )   (7,237 )   (7,411 )   (7,425 )     (26,460 )   (12,880 )
    Noninterest expense, excl. amortization of intangibles   365,136     261,641     269,587     264,872     275,574       626,777     532,436  
    Less: Amortization of tax credit investments   (5,815 )   (3,424 )   (4,556 )   (3,277 )   (2,747 )     (9,239 )   (5,496 )
    Less: Noninterest expense adjustments   (41,206 )   (5,856 )   (8,117 )   (9,506 )   (19,440 )     (47,062 )   (38,660 )
    Adjusted noninterest expense, excluding amortization $ 318,115   $ 252,361   $ 256,914   $ 252,089   $ 253,387     $ 570,476   $ 488,280  
    Total revenue (FTE)2 $ 654,370   $ 486,797   $ 495,723   $ 492,006   $ 482,032     $ 1,141,167   $ 922,265  
    Less: Debt securities (gains) losses   41     76     122     76     (2 )     117     14  
    Less: Pension plan gain   (21,001 )   —     —     —     —       (21,001 )   —  
    Total adjusted revenue $ 633,410   $ 486,873   $ 495,845   $ 492,082   $ 482,030     $ 1,120,283   $ 922,279  
    Efficiency Ratio   55.8 %   53.7 %   54.4 %   53.8 %   57.2 %     54.9 %   57.7 %
    Adjusted Efficiency Ratio   50.2 %   51.8 %   51.8 %   51.2 %   52.6 %     50.9 %   52.9 %
                     
    Refer to last page of Non-GAAP reconciliations for footnotes.            
                     
    Non-GAAP Measures (unaudited)
    ($ in thousands)
                     
      Three Months Ended   Six Months Ended
      June 30, March 31, December 31, September 30, June 30,   June 30, June 30,
        2025     2025     2024     2024     2024       2025     2024  
    ROAE and ROATCE:                
    Net income applicable to common shares $ 121,375   $ 140,625   $ 149,839   $ 139,768   $ 117,196     $ 262,000   $ 233,446  
    Amortization of intangibles   19,630     6,830     7,237     7,411     7,425       26,460     12,880  
    Tax effect1   (4,908 )   (1,708 )   (1,809 )   (1,853 )   (1,856 )     (6,615 )   (3,220 )
    Amortization of intangibles, net   14,722     5,122     5,428     5,558     5,569       19,845     9,660  
    Net income applicable to common shares, excluding intangibles amortization   136,097     145,747     155,267     145,326     122,765       281,845     243,106  
    Total adjustments, net (see pg.12)   69,478     4,829     6,150     7,448     26,862       74,307     41,403  
    Adjusted net income applicable to common shares, excluding intangibles amortization $ 205,575   $ 150,576   $ 161,417   $ 152,774   $ 149,627     $ 356,152   $ 284,509  
    Average shareholders’ equity $ 7,452,116   $ 6,416,485   $ 6,338,953   $ 6,190,071   $ 5,978,976     $ 6,937,161   $ 5,772,259  
    Less: Average preferred equity   (243,719 )   (243,719 )   (243,719 )   (243,719 )   (243,719 )     (243,719 )   (243,719 )
    Average shareholders’ common equity $ 7,208,397   $ 6,172,766   $ 6,095,234   $ 5,946,352   $ 5,735,257     $ 6,693,442   $ 5,528,540  
    Average goodwill and other intangible assets   (2,670,710 )   (2,292,526 )   (2,301,177 )   (2,304,597 )   (2,245,405 )     (2,482,663 )   (2,171,872 )
    Average tangible shareholder’s common equity $ 4,537,687   $ 3,880,240   $ 3,794,057   $ 3,641,755   $ 3,489,852     $ 4,210,779   $ 3,356,668  
    ROAE   6.7 %   9.1 %   9.8 %   9.4 %   8.2 %     7.8 %   8.4 %
    ROAE, adjusted   10.6 %   9.4 %   10.2 %   9.9 %   10.0 %     10.0 %   9.9 %
    ROATCE   12.0 %   15.0 %   16.4 %   16.0 %   14.1 %     13.4 %   14.5 %
    ROATCE, adjusted   18.1 %   15.5 %   17.0 %   16.8 %   17.1 %     16.9 %   17.0 %
                     
    Refer to last page of Non-GAAP reconciliations for footnotes.            
               
    Non-GAAP Measures (unaudited)
    ($ in thousands)
               
      As of
      June 30, March 31, December 31, September 30, June 30,
        2025     2025     2024     2024     2024  
    Tangible Common Equity:          
    Shareholders’ equity $ 8,126,387   $ 6,534,654   $ 6,340,350   $ 6,367,298   $ 6,075,072  
    Less: Preferred equity   (243,719 )   (243,719 )   (243,719 )   (243,719 )   (243,719 )
    Shareholders’ common equity $ 7,882,668   $ 6,290,935   $ 6,096,631   $ 6,123,579   $ 5,831,353  
    Less: Goodwill and other intangible assets   (2,944,372 )   (2,289,268 )   (2,296,098 )   (2,305,084 )   (2,306,204 )
    Tangible shareholders’ common equity $ 4,938,296   $ 4,001,667   $ 3,800,533   $ 3,818,495   $ 3,525,149  
               
    Total assets $ 70,979,805   $ 53,877,944   $ 53,552,272   $ 53,602,293   $ 53,119,645  
    Less: Goodwill and other intangible assets   (2,944,372 )   (2,289,268 )   (2,296,098 )   (2,305,084 )   (2,306,204 )
    Tangible assets $ 68,035,433   $ 51,588,676   $ 51,256,174   $ 51,297,209   $ 50,813,441  
               
    Risk-weighted assets3 $ 52,517,871   $ 40,266,670   $ 40,314,805   $ 40,584,608   $ 40,627,117  
               
    Tangible common equity to tangible assets   7.26 %   7.76 %   7.41 %   7.44 %   6.94 %
    Tangible common equity to risk-weighted assets3   9.40 %   9.94 %   9.43 %   9.41 %   8.68 %
    Tangible Common Book Value:          
    Common shares outstanding   391,818     319,236     318,980     318,955     318,969  
    Tangible common book value $ 12.60   $ 12.54   $ 11.91   $ 11.97   $ 11.05  
               
    1 Tax-effect calculations use management’s estimate of the full year FTE tax rates (federal + state).
    2 Calculated using the federal statutory tax rate in effect of 21% for all periods.
    3 June 30, 2025 figures are preliminary.

    A photo accompanying this announcement is available at https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/1e11c9d1-b9ea-4a5c-a250-cb6dc83091a5

    The MIL Network –

    July 22, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Security: Defense News in Brief: AFMAO embodies ‘No Airman left behind’ – Operation Colony Glacier 2025

    Source: United States Airforce

    ANCHORAGE, Alaska (AFNS) —  

    Forty miles from Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, and accessible only by helicopter, U.S. Air Force Capt. Travis Lockwood stands on Colony Glacier. Before him lies a wide, unforgiving landscape scattered with debris from a long-ago tragedy that has become a mission of recovery and reunion, 73 years later.

    Colony Glacier is a large glacier that is home to the debris of a C-124 Globemaster that crashed into the side of Mount Gannett. Originally taking off from McChord Air Force Base, Washington, Nov. 22, 1952, en route to Elmendorf AFB, the aircraft never made it to its destination. The accident took the lives of 52 passengers and crew members. As of June 2025, 49 of 52 passengers have been identified. The recovery mission has taken place annually since 2012, when the contents of the crash were discovered.

    Lockwood, who is the Operation Colony Glacier ground forces commander and recovery team lead, as well as an Air Force Mortuary Affairs Operations mortuary affairs deputy chief, travels from Dover AFB, Delaware, twice a summer for both phases of the operation, spending multiple weeks upon the blue ice, searching for key pieces of human remains, personal effects and identifiable information from the fallen aircraft passengers.

    Working with a team of joint partners including Armed Forces Medical Examiner System personnel, the Alaska Army National Guard, and JB Elmendorf-Richardson volunteers, Lockwood is able to bring pieces of bones, soft tissue, clothing articles, fully intact ID cards and large parts of the now retired C-124 back to Dover AFB where they will be sent to AFMES. 

    Lockwood describes a day on the ice as rewarding, despite being physically challenging. Safety is one of Lockwood’s priorities as the team lead.

    “The glacier is hard-packed ice covered in loose rock. Everything from gravel to large boulders. It’s not flat; there are steep inclines, crevasses, and hidden obstacles everywhere,” Lockwood explains, eyes scanning his cold surroundings, hearing the constant sound of rushing water pouring from the melting surfaces.

    “Temperature-wise, it ranges from the low 40s to mid-30s, with a lot of wind. And the glacier is constantly changing, it is melting, shifting, moving, so every day we reassess the area we’re working in.”

    The team, usually consisting of about seven crew members, begins their day with a 20-minute flight on an Alaska Army National Guard UH-60L Black Hawk, where skilled Army pilots are able to land the aircraft on small, uneven surfaces upon the ice for a brief, hot unloading. The recovery team is highly trained and carries a days worth of gear, with them preparing for the mission by attending mountaineering school in order to be able to navigate the rough terrain and have the ability to reach deeply into the glacial crevasses.

    Every day is a new day on Colony, due to the landscape constantly melting and revealing more debris underneath. The team moves miles down the glacier every year. Lockwood explains that oftentimes the surfaces are unrecognizable, so it is important they discover as much as they can because nothing will be in the same place tomorrow. The operation is split into two phases each summer, in order to let new parts of the landscape melt down to expose more content to search through. Weather conditions on the glacier are monitored by the 3rd Wing, JB Elmendorf-Richardson, who provide an on-site weather team. 

    Despite the challenging daily challenges on the glacier, the team is able to stay focused on the mission due to strong team bonds that can only truly be felt by those who have touched the ice and mission, according to Lockwood.

    “There’s a unique bond out here, one that only those who’ve been on this mission understand,” he explains. “You can’t explain what it’s like until you’re standing on the ice, finding human remains and personal effects. That experience creates a deep, unspoken connection among the team. We’re united by the mission and by our commitment to each other.”

    Returning personal effects to family members is one of the largest goals of Operation Colony Glacier. AFMAO and AFMES members recently were able to meet with children, cousins, nieces and nephews and friends of the fallen service members at an event in Dover. Families sharing memories of the fallen members highlighted the impact of the mission, and how their hard work to bring home and identify every member does not go unnoticed.

    Finding personal effects such as wallets, clothing, and safety equipment can be emotionally painful.

    Lockwood highlights one of the more emotional recoveries he made, a wallet belonging to a passenger and a father’s belongings.

    “Last year, we found a couple of wallets, one of which had contents like business cards and money. One wallet had a printed paper that said ‘mom’s sizes’ — her dress and shoe sizes. It was November, so maybe he was planning to buy her a Christmas present,” explains Lockwood. “I also found a family photo, and behind it, folded up, was a birth certificate for a daughter who was two months old. This individual had a brand new baby and was carrying her birth certificate at the time of the crash … that really puts a personal touch on things and makes (the mission) emotional, knowing these people left families behind and lost their lives coming up here.”

    During phase one of 2025, the team was able to find another completely intact wallet that included a fully preserved ID card, photos, mess hall pass, taxi receipt and TDY orders.

    With the personal effects and human remains that are found by the on-ice team, AFMES is able to do DNA processing, fingerprint examination and other identification processes.

    A key team member in this process is an Operation Colony Glacier veteran, Carlos Colon. Colon is an AFMES medicolegal death investigator and the operations subject matter expert. Colon has returned to the glacier every year for eight years, consistently bringing back and selecting the best viable specimens, submitting them to the DNA lab for processing, with identification usually happening within a year. On the ice, Colon organizes and numbers the samples, helping the team identify what would be suitable specimen to send back. Every day, he visits the morgue on JB Elmendorf-Richardson and oversees the process of storing the remains before they are brought to Dover AFB.

    Colon, originally from Puerto Rico, served in the U.S. Army as a mortuary affairs specialist, where he would discover and process remains, helping to send them to Dover AFB. He became interested in AFMES and the medical side of the process after witnessing a pathologist, photographer and investigator in Iraq, leading him to pursue a career in forensic investigation. 

    Combining his army and civilian experience, Colon has made many impacts to families and to fallen service members, helping them with dignity, honor and respect. Carlos highlights the importance of the mission, emphasizing the promise to bring service members back to their families.

    “We won’t leave you behind. For me, it’s a cool reminder, especially for the guys in combat arms, infantry, or combat engineers, that the DoD really does this. Having them participate is special. A lot of them say, ‘Wow, I can’t believe we’re still doing this after all these years.’ That’s my favorite part. I’ve seen a lot of deaths in my career, so I also find it rewarding to create an environment where it’s easier for people to process what’s happening, so they’re not as affected.”

    Colon explains that what keeps him motivated on the ice is how determined everyone is to make all 52 identifications. He shares that one of his favorite memories was when a fellow team member brought a speaker to the glacier, playing music from the 1950s that would have been popular in the time of the crash while they searched.

    “I wish people knew many people are involved in this mission,” Colon says. “How many organizations, how many individuals and how invested everybody is to see it through.”

    At the end of the mission each year, AFMAO organizes a dignified departure for the remains before transporting the remains to Dover AFB. The long, demanding days, unwavering motivation and commitment to service from all team members and units make this accomplishment possible.

    Colony Glacier is a one-of-a-kind mission that is authentically able to represent the Air Force’s commitment to never leaving an Airman behind.

    “We will never leave somebody behind. We’ve made a commitment to the fallen and their families that we will bring them home,” Lockwood said. “The lengths we go to do that are very special … we will care for your Airmen, your Soldiers, your Marines. From the time they join until the time they leave, or until they are brought home. They are not forgotten.”

    MIL Security OSI –

    July 22, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: Hut 8 Advances Capital Strategy with DIFC License

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    MIAMI, July 22, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Hut 8 Corp. (Nasdaq | TSX: HUT) (“Hut 8” or the “Company”), an energy infrastructure platform integrating power, digital infrastructure, and compute at scale to fuel next-generation, energy-intensive use cases such as Bitcoin mining and high-performance computing, today announced that its subsidiary, Hut 8 Investment Ltd, has secured a Commercial License in the Dubai International Financial Centre (“DIFC”). The license authorizes proprietary investments and certain non-financial commercial activity under the DIFC’s legal and regulatory framework, which is based on international standards and principles of common law.

    The DIFC license represents a structural expansion of Hut 8’s capital strategy, enhancing the Company’s ability to deploy Bitcoin held in reserve into structured derivatives strategies. The license is expected to broaden access to institutional counterparties, reduce trading friction, and lower transaction costs. In fiscal year 2024, Hut 8 generated more than $20 million in net proceeds from covered call options premiums on Bitcoin held in reserve. Through its presence in the DIFC, Hut 8 expects to unlock multiple advantages that support continued expansion of its active treasury management program, including:

    • Direct access to global derivatives markets: Enables Hut 8 to trade directly on institutional exchanges, reducing reliance on OTC intermediaries that historically introduced cost friction relative to spot pricing
    • Broader access to institutional-grade products and counterparties: Unlocks a wider set of global liquidity providers and instruments, enhancing strategic optionality
    • Greater flexibility in structured strategy design and execution: Allows Hut 8 to construct and manage advanced yield strategies that would more difficult to execute without a DIFC license
    • Supportive regulatory environment within a common law framework: Dubai offers an established legal and regulatory foundation for institutional digital asset activity, supporting enhanced enforceability, compliance certainty, and jurisdictional alignment

    “We believe that securing a DIFC license enhances our ability to drive outsized shareholder returns through our integrated capital strategy,” said Asher Genoot, CEO of Hut 8. “It allows us to execute directly on global derivatives markets, reduce trading costs, and access a broader range of institutional products. Within a regulatory environment that supports structured digital asset strategies, we believe we can manage Bitcoin held in reserve more efficiently, manage risk with greater precision, and optimize yield through disciplined, proactive management.”

    About Hut 8 

    Hut 8 Corp. is an energy infrastructure platform integrating power, digital infrastructure, and compute at scale to fuel next-generation, energy-intensive use cases such as Bitcoin mining and high-performance computing. We take a power-first, innovation-driven approach to developing, commercializing, and operating the critical infrastructure that underpins the breakthrough technologies of today and tomorrow. Our platform spans 1,020 megawatts of energy capacity under management across 15 sites in the United States and Canada: five Bitcoin mining, hosting, and Managed Services sites in Alberta, New York, and Texas, five high performance computing data centers in British Columbia and Ontario, four power generation assets in Ontario, and one non-operational site in Alberta. For more information, visit www.hut8.com and follow us on X at @Hut8Corp.

    About Dubai International Financial Centre

    Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC) is one of the world’s most advanced financial centres and a leading financial hub for the Middle East, Africa, and South Asia (MEASA). With a 20-year track record of facilitating trade and investment flows across the MEASA region, the Centre connects these fast-growing markets with the economies of Asia, Europe, and the Americas through Dubai. DIFC is home to an internationally recognised, independent regulator and a proven judicial system with an English common law framework. The Centre’s vision is to drive the future of finance through cutting-edge technology, innovation, and partnerships. Today, it is the global future of finance and innovation hub offering one of the region’s most comprehensive AI, FinTech and venture capital environments, including cost-effective licensing solutions, fit-for-purpose regulation, innovative accelerator programmes, and funding for growth-stage start-ups. For further information, please visit our website: difc.ae or follow us on LinkedIn and X at @DIFC.

    Cautionary Note Regarding Forward–Looking Information

    This press release includes “forward-looking information” and “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Canadian securities laws and United States securities laws, respectively (collectively, “forward-looking information”). All information, other than statements of historical facts, included in this press release that address activities, events, or developments that Hut 8 expects or anticipates will or may occur in the future, including statements relating to the Company’s use of its DIFC license to expand its capital strategy, enhance the Company’s ability to deploy Bitcoin held in reserve, broaden access to institutional counterparties, reduce trading friction, lower transaction costs, and unlock other advantages to support the expansion of the Company’s active treasury management program; the impact of the DIFC’s regulatory framework; the ability of the Company to drive outsized shareholder returns; and other such matters is forward-looking information. Forward-looking information is often identified by the words “may”, “would”, “could”, “should”, “will”, “intend”, “plan”, “anticipate”, “allow”, “believe”, “estimate”, “expect”, “predict”, “can”, “might”, “potential”, “predict”, “is designed to”, “likely,” or similar expressions.

    Statements containing forward-looking information are not historical facts, but instead represent management’s expectations, estimates, and projections regarding future events based on certain material factors and assumptions at the time the statement was made. While considered reasonable by Hut 8 as of the date of this press release, such statements are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties, assumptions and other factors that may cause the actual results, level of activity, performance, or achievements to be materially different from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking information, including, but not limited to, failure of critical systems; geopolitical, social, economic, and other events and circumstances; competition from current and future competitors; risks related to power requirements; cybersecurity threats and breaches; hazards and operational risks; changes in leasing arrangements; Internet-related disruptions; dependence on key personnel; having a limited operating history; attracting and retaining customers; entering into new offerings or lines of business; price fluctuations and rapidly changing technologies; construction of new data centers, data center expansions, or data center redevelopment; predicting facility requirements; strategic alliances or joint ventures; operating and expanding internationally; failing to grow hashrate; purchasing miners; relying on third-party mining pool service providers; uncertainty in the development and acceptance of the Bitcoin network; Bitcoin halving events; competition from other methods of investing in Bitcoin; concentration of Bitcoin holdings; hedging transactions; potential liquidity constraints; legal, regulatory, governmental, and technological uncertainties; physical risks related to climate change; involvement in legal proceedings; trading volatility; and other risks described from time to time in Company’s filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. In particular, see the Company’s recent and upcoming annual and quarterly reports and other continuous disclosure documents, which are available under the Company’s EDGAR profile at www.sec.gov and SEDAR+ profile at www.sedarplus.ca.

    Hut 8 Corp. Investor Relations
    Sue Ennis
    ir@hut8.com

    Hut 8 Corp. Public Relations
    Gautier Lemyze-Young
    media@hut8.com

    The MIL Network –

    July 22, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Security: Defense News in Brief: Living Namesake Rides First Set of Sea Trials for DDG 124

    Source: United States Navy

    In a rare moment of living history, ship namesake and Medal of Honor recipient, Col. Harvey “Barney” Barnum Jr. joined members of future USS Harvey C. Barnum Jr.’s (DDG 124) crew, the Navy programmatic team, and industry partners onboard the ship’s first set of sea trials, departing from General Dynamics Bath Iron Works, July 15.

    MIL Security OSI –

    July 22, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Africa: Dallas Mayor Signs City Sister Partnership with Dar es Salaam Counterpart

    Source: APO – Report:

    .

    On July 22, 2025, Mayor of Dallas, Texas, USA, Eric L. Johnson and his Dar es Salaam counterpart Mayor Omary Kumbilamoto signed a Sister City Partnership aimed at deepening commercial, cultural, and educational ties.

    The signing ceremony, held at the Hyatt Regency Hotel in Dar es Salaam, was also witnessed by the United States Chargé d’Affaires Jonathan Howard, Tanzania’s Ambassador to the United States, Elsie Kanza, and other Tanzanian government officials.

    Mayor Johnson is in Tanzania for an eight-day visit to explore trade opportunities and strengthen economic partnership between Dallas and Dar es Salaam as well as other parts of Tanzania.  He is also visiting Zanzibar and Arusha.

    The mayor is joined by members of the Tanzanian American Chamber of Commerce (TACC), which is headquartered in Dallas, Texas, and seeks to promote bilateral trade between Tanzania and the United States.  The delegation has had productive meetings with the Regional Commissioner of Dar es Salaam, representatives from various Ministries in the Tanzanian government, and the American Chamber of Commerce in Tanzania.

    As a major hub for American innovation in the agribusiness, health care, energy, tech, logistics, manufacturing, and financial services sectors, the City of Dallas has set a global standard for how municipal governments can leverage infrastructure development and business incentives to develop a vibrant economy. Thanks to its status as a commercial center and one of the fastest growing cities in the world, Dar es Salaam is a key gateway for unlocking international trade and investment in Tanzania with immense potential to create jobs and economic prosperity for citizens in both countries.

    – on behalf of U.S. Embassy in Tanzania.

    MIL OSI Africa –

    July 22, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: President Lai meets cross-party Irish Oireachtas delegation

    Source: Republic of China Taiwan

    Details
    2025-07-22
    President Lai meets official delegation from European Parliament’s Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield
    On the morning of July 22, President Lai Ching-te met with an official delegation from the European Parliament’s Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield (EUDS). In remarks, President Lai thanked the committee for choosing to visit Taiwan for its first trip to Asia, demonstrating the close ties between Taiwan and Europe. President Lai emphasized that Taiwan, standing at the very frontline of the democratic world, is determined to protect democracy, peace, and prosperity worldwide. He expressed hope that we can share our experiences with Europe to foster even more resilient societies. A translation of President Lai’s remarks follows: Firstly, on behalf of the people of Taiwan, I extend a warm welcome to your delegation, which marks another official visit from the European Parliament. The Special Committee on the EUDS aims to strengthen societal resilience and counter disinformation and hybrid threats. Having been constituted at the beginning of this year, the committee has chosen to visit Taiwan for its first trip to Asia, demonstrating the close ties between Taiwan and Europe and the unlimited possibilities for deepening cooperation on issues of concern. I am also delighted to see many old friends of Taiwan gathered here today. I deeply appreciate your longstanding support for Taiwan. Taiwan and the European Union enjoy close trade and economic relations and share the values of freedom and democracy. However, in recent years, we have both been subjected to information manipulation and infiltration by foreign forces that seek to interfere in democratic elections, foment division in our societies, and shake people’s faith in democracy. Taiwan not only faces an onslaught of disinformation, but also is the target of gray-zone aggression. That is why, after taking office, I established the Whole-of-Society Defense Resilience Committee at the Presidential Office, with myself as convener. The committee is a platform that integrates domestic affairs, national defense, foreign affairs, cybersecurity, and civil resources. It aims to strengthen the capability of Taiwan’s society to defend itself against new forms of threat, pinpoint external and internal vulnerabilities, and bolster overall resilience and security. The efforts that democracies make are not for opposing anyone else; they are for safeguarding the way of life that we cherish – just as Europe has endeavored to promote diversity and human rights. The Taiwanese people firmly believe that when our society is united and people trust one another, we will be able to withstand any form of authoritarian aggression. Taiwan stands at the very frontline of the democratic world. We are determined to protect democracy, peace, and prosperity worldwide. We also hope to share our experiences with Europe and deepen cooperation in such fields as cybersecurity, media literacy, and societal resilience. Thank you once again for visiting Taiwan. Your presence further strengthens the foundations of Taiwan-Europe relations. Let us continue to work together to uphold freedom and democracy and foster even more resilient societies. EUDS Special Committee Chair Nathalie Loiseau then delivered remarks, saying that the delegation has members from different countries, including France, Germany, the Czech Republic, Poland, and Belgium, and different political parties, but that they have in common their desire for stronger relations between the EU and Taiwan. Committee Chair Loiseau stated that the EU and Taiwan, having many things in common, should work more together. She noted that we have strong trade relations, strong investments on both sides, and strong cultural relations, while we are also facing very similar challenges and threats. She said that we are democracies living in a world where autocracies want to weaken and divide democracies. She added that we also face external information manipulation, cyberattacks, sabotage, attempts to capture elites, and every single gray-zone activity that aims to divide and weaken us. Committee Chair Loiseau pointed out another commonality, that we have never threatened our neighbors. She said that we want to live in peace and we care about our people; we want to defend ourselves, not to attack others. We are not being threatened because of what we do, she emphasized, but because of what we are; and thus there is no reason for not working more together to face these threats and attacks. Committee Chair Loiseau said that Taiwan has valuable experience and good practices in the area of societal resilience, and that they are interested in learning more about Taiwan’s whole-of-society approach. They in Europe are facing interference, she said, mainly from Russia, and they know that Russia inspires others. She added that they in the EU also have experience regulating social media in a way which combines freedom of expression and responsibility. In closing, the chair said that they are happy to have the opportunity to exchange views with President Lai and that the European Parliament will continue to strongly support relations between the EU and Taiwan. The delegation also included Members of the European Parliament Engin Eroglu, Tomáš Zdechovský, Michał Wawrykiewicz, Kathleen Van Brempt, and Markéta Gregorová.

    Details
    2025-07-17
    President Lai meets President of Guatemalan Congress Nery Abilio Ramos y Ramos  
    On the morning of July 17, President Lai Ching-te met with a delegation led by Nery Abilio Ramos y Ramos, the president of the Congress of the Republic of Guatemala. In remarks, President Lai thanked Congress President Ramos and the Guatemalan Congress for their support for Taiwan, and noted that official diplomatic relations between Taiwan and Guatemala go back more than 90 years. As important partners in the global democratic community, the president said, the two nations will continue moving forward together in joint defense of the values of democracy and freedom, and will cooperate to promote regional and global prosperity and development. A translation of President Lai’s remarks follows:  I recall that when Congress President Ramos visited Taiwan in July last year, he put forward many ideas about how our countries could promote bilateral cooperation and exchanges. Now, a year later, he is leading another cross-party delegation from the Guatemalan Congress on a visit, demonstrating support for Taiwan and continuing to help deepen our diplomatic ties. In addition to extending a sincere welcome to the distinguished delegation members who have traveled so far to be here, I would also like to express our concern and condolences for everyone in Guatemala affected by the earthquake that struck earlier this month. We hope that the recovery effort is going smoothly. Official diplomatic relations between Taiwan and Guatemala go back more than 90 years. In such fields as healthcare, agriculture, education, and women’s empowerment, we have continually strengthened our cooperation to benefit our peoples. Just last month, Guatemala’s President Bernardo Arévalo and the First Lady led a delegation on a state visit to Taiwan. President Arévalo and I signed a letter of intent for semiconductor cooperation, and also witnessed the signing of cooperation documents to establish a political consultation mechanism and continue to promote bilateral investment. This has laid an even sounder foundation for bilateral exchanges and cooperation, and will help enhance both countries’ international competitiveness. Taiwan is currently running a semiconductor vocational training program, helping Guatemala cultivate semiconductor talent and develop its tech industry, and demonstrating our determination to share experience with democratic partners. At the same time, we continue to assist Taiwanese businesses in their efforts to develop overseas markets with Guatemala as an important base, spurring industrial development in both countries and increasing economic and trade benefits. I want to thank Congress President Ramos and the Guatemalan Congress for their continued support for Taiwan’s international participation. Representing the Guatemalan Congress, Congress President Ramos has signed resolutions in support of Taiwan, and has also issued statements addressing China’s misinterpretation of United Nations General Assembly Resolution 2758. Taiwan and Guatemala, as important partners in the global democratic community, will continue moving forward together in joint defense of the values of democracy and freedom, and will cooperate to promote regional and global prosperity and development. Congress President Ramos then delivered remarks, first noting that the members of the delegation are not only from different parties, but also represent different classes, cultures, professions, and departments, which shows that the diplomatic ties between Guatemala and the Republic of China (Taiwan) are based on firm friendships at all levels and in all fields. Noting that this was his second time to visit Taiwan and meet with President Lai, Congress President Ramos thanked the government of Taiwan for its warm hospitality. With the international situation growing more complex by the day, he said, Guatemala highly values its longstanding friendship and cooperative ties with Taiwan, and hopes that both sides can continue to deepen their cooperation in such areas as the economy, technology, education, agriculture, and culture, and work together to spur sustainable development in each of our countries. Congress President Ramos said that the way the Taiwan government looks after the well-being of its people is an excellent model for how other countries should promote national development and social well-being. Accordingly, he said, the Guatemalan Congress has stood for justice and, for a second time, adopted a resolution backing Taiwan’s participation in the World Health Assembly. Regarding President Arévalo’s state visit to Taiwan the previous month, Congress President Ramos commented that this high-level interaction has undoubtedly strengthened the diplomatic ties between Taiwan and Guatemala and led to more opportunities for cooperation. Congress President Ramos emphasized that democracy, freedom, and human rights are universal values that bind Taiwan and Guatemala together, and that he is confident the two countries’ diplomatic ties will continue to grow deeper. In closing, on behalf of the Republic of Guatemala, Congress President Ramos presented President Lai with a Chinese translation of the resolution that the Guatemalan Congress proposed to the UN in support of Taiwan’s participation in international organizations, demonstrating the staunch bonds of friendship between the two countries. The delegation was accompanied to the Presidential Office by Guatemala Ambassador Luis Raúl Estévez López.  

    Details
    2025-07-08
    President Lai meets delegation led by Foreign Minister Jean-Victor Harvel Jean-Baptiste of Republic of Haiti
    On the morning of July 8, President Lai Ching-te met with a delegation led by Minister of Foreign Affairs Jean-Victor Harvel Jean-Baptiste of the Republic of Haiti and his wife. In remarks, President Lai noted that our two countries will soon mark the 70th anniversary of diplomatic relations and that our exchanges have been fruitful in important areas such as public security, educational cooperation, and infrastructure. The president stated that Taiwan will continue to work together with Haiti to promote the development of medical and health care, food security, and construction that benefits people’s livelihoods. The president thanked Haiti for supporting Taiwan’s international participation and expressed hope that both countries will continue to support each other, deepen cooperation, and face various challenges together. A translation of President Lai’s remarks follows: I am delighted to meet and exchange ideas with Minister Jean-Baptiste, his wife, and our distinguished guests. Minister Jean-Baptiste is the highest-ranking official from Haiti to visit Taiwan since former President Jovenel Moïse visited in 2018, demonstrating the importance that the Haitian government attaches to our bilateral diplomatic ties. On behalf of the Republic of China (Taiwan), I extend a sincere welcome. Next year marks the 70th anniversary of the establishment of diplomatic ties between our two countries. Our bilateral exchanges have been fruitful in important areas such as public security, educational cooperation, and infrastructure. Over the past few years, Haiti has faced challenges in such areas as food supply and healthcare. Taiwan will continue to work together with Haiti through various cooperative programs to promote the development of medical and health care, food security, and construction that benefits people’s livelihoods. I want to thank the government of Haiti and Minister Jean-Baptiste for speaking out in support of Taiwan on the international stage for many years. Minister Jean-Baptiste’s personal letter to the World Health Organization Secretariat in May this year and Minister of Public Health and Population Bertrand Sinal’s public statement during the World Health Assembly both affirmed Taiwan’s efforts and contributions to global public health and supported Taiwan’s international participation, for which we are very grateful. I hope that Taiwan and Haiti will continue to support each other and deepen cooperation. I believe that Minister Jean-Baptiste’s visit will open up more opportunities for cooperation for both countries, helping Taiwan and Haiti face various challenges together. In closing, I once again offer a sincere welcome to the delegation led by Minister Jean-Baptiste, and ask him to convey greetings from Taiwan to Prime Minister Alix Didier Fils-Aimé and the members of the Transitional Presidential Council. Minister Jean-Baptiste then delivered remarks, saying that he is extremely honored to visit Taiwan and reaffirm the solid and friendly cooperative relationship based on mutual respect between the Republic of Haiti and the Republic of China (Taiwan), which will soon mark its 70th anniversary. He also brought greetings to President Lai from Haiti’s Transitional Presidential Council and Prime Minister Fils-Aimé. Minister Jean-Baptiste emphasized that over the past few decades, despite the great geographical distance and developmental and cultural differences between our two countries, we have nevertheless established a firm friendship and demonstrated to the world the progress resulting from the mutual assistance and cooperation between our peoples. Minister Jean-Baptiste pointed out that our two countries cooperate closely in agriculture, health, education, and community development and have achieved concrete results. Taiwan’s voice, he said, is thus essential for the people of Haiti. He noted that Taiwan also plays an important role in peace and innovation and actively participates in global cooperative efforts. Pointing out that the world is currently facing significant challenges and that Haiti is experiencing its most difficult period in history, Minister Jean-Baptiste said that at this time, Taiwan and Haiti need to unite, help each other, and jointly think about how to move forward and deepen bilateral relations to benefit the peoples of both countries. Minister Jean-Baptiste said that he is pleased that throughout our solid and friendly diplomatic relationship, both countries have demonstrated mutual trust, mutual respect, and the values we jointly defend. He then stated his belief that Haiti and Taiwan will together create a cooperation model and future that are sincere, friendly, and sustainable. The delegation was accompanied to the Presidential Office by Chargé d’Affaires a.i. Francilien Victorin of the Embassy of the Republic of Haiti in Taiwan.

    Details
    2025-07-01
    President Lai meets delegation from 2025 Taiwan International Ocean Forum
    On the afternoon of July 1, President Lai Ching-te met with a delegation from the 2025 Taiwan International Ocean Forum (TIOF). In remarks, President Lai noted that the people of Taiwan will continue to work with democratic partners throughout the world in a maritime spirit of freedom and openness to contribute to ocean governance and jointly ensure maritime security. He expressed hope that their visit will help forge stronger friendships between Taiwan and international maritime partners, so that all can work together to spur shared maritime prosperity and sustainable development for the next generation. A translation of President Lai’s remarks follows: I want to thank our guests for coming here to the Presidential Office. The 2025 TIOF will take place tomorrow and the day after, and I thank you all for making the long trip to Taiwan to attend the event and share your valuable insights and experiences. This year’s forum will focus on strategies for strengthening maritime security and pathways to achieving a sustainable blue economy. By attending this forum, our guests are highlighting their commitment to safeguarding the oceans, and beyond that, taking concrete action to demonstrate support for Taiwan. I once again offer deepest gratitude on behalf of the people of Taiwan. Taiwan holds a key position on the first island chain, is one of the world’s top 10 shipping nations, and accounts for close to 10 percent of global container shipping by volume. As such, Taiwan occupies a unique and important position in maritime strategy. For Taiwan, the ocean is more than just a basis for survival and development; it is also an important driver of national prosperity. In my inaugural address last year, I spoke of a threefold approach to further Taiwan’s development. One of these involves further developing our strengths as a maritime nation. Our government must actively help deepen our connections with the ocean, and must continue to promote green shipping, a sustainable fishing industry, marine renewable energy, and other forms of industrial transformation. It must also make use of marine technology and digital innovation to create a new paradigm that balances environmental, economic, and social inclusion concerns. This will help enhance Taiwan’s responsibilities and competitiveness as a maritime nation. Taiwan is surrounded by ocean, and our territorial waters are a natural protective barrier. However, continued gray-zone aggression from China creates serious threats and challenges to peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait. Our government continues to invest resources to deal with increasingly complex maritime security issues. In addition to building coast guard patrol vessels, we must also step up efforts to build underwater, surface, and airborne unmanned vehicles and smart reconnaissance equipment, so as to demonstrate Taiwan’s determination to defend democracy and freedom and commitment to maintaining peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait. Oceans are Taiwan’s roots, and provide the channels by which we engage with the world. The people of Taiwan will continue to work with democratic partners throughout the world in a maritime spirit of freedom and openness to contribute to ocean governance and jointly ensure maritime security. The TIOF was first launched in 2020, and has now become an important platform for enhancement of cooperation between Taiwan and other countries. I hope that our distinguished guests will reap great benefits at this year’s forum, and further hope that this visit will help forge stronger friendships between Taiwan and international maritime partners, so that all can work together to spur shared maritime prosperity and sustainable development for the next generation. Chairman of The Washington Times Thomas McDevitt, a member of the delegation, then delivered remarks, noting first that July 4th, this Friday, is Independence Day in America. Independence is a sacred, powerful word which has great meaning in this part of the world, he said. Chairman McDevitt indicated that Taiwan has truly become a global beacon of democracy and a key partner for many nations. He then quoted President Lai’s 2024 inaugural address: “We will work together to combat disinformation, strengthen democratic resilience, address challenges, and allow Taiwan to become the MVP of the democratic world.” Chairman McDevitt went on to say that he appreciated the president’s speech with regard to his philosophical depth, sensitivity, and both moral and political clarity. He said that he was deeply moved by the speech, but within a few days of it, China responded with military activities and many threats. The chairman then emphasized that we are in a civilization crisis. Chairman McDevitt mentioned that President Lai has begun a series of 10 lectures, and remarked that they would help the world to understand the identity and the nature of Taiwan, as well as the situation we are in in the world. On behalf of all the delegation, Chairman McDevitt thanked the president for his leadership in dealing with these issues thoughtfully. Chairman McDevitt concluded with a line from the Old Testament which states that if the people have no vision, they will perish. He said that he believes Taiwan’s president has led the people of Taiwan, and the world, with a vision of how to navigate this great civilization crisis together. The delegation also included Members of the Japanese House of Representatives Kikawada Hitoshi, Aoyama Yamato, and Genma Kentaro, and Member of Parliament of the United Kingdom Gavin Williamson.

    Details
    2025-06-30
    President Lai meets Minister of State at UK Department for Business and Trade Douglas Alexander  
    On the morning of June 30, President Lai Ching-te met with Douglas Alexander, Minister of State at the Department for Business and Trade of the United Kingdom. In remarks, President Lai thanked the UK government for its longstanding support for peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait, demonstrating that Taiwan and the UK share similar goals. Noting that two years ago, Taiwan and the UK signed an enhanced trade partnership (ETP) arrangement, the president said that today Taiwan and the UK have signed three pillars under the ETP, which will help promote bilateral economic and trade cooperation. He expressed hope of the UK publicly supporting Taiwan’s accession to the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) so that together we can create an economic and trade landscape in the Indo-Pacific characterized by shared prosperity and development. A translation of President Lai’s remarks follows: First, on behalf of the people of Taiwan, I extend a warm welcome to Minister Alexander and wish a fruitful outcome for the 27th round of Taiwan-UK trade talks later today. Taiwan-UK relations have grown closer in recent years. We have not only continued to strengthen cooperation in such fields as offshore wind power, innovative technologies, and culture and education but also have established regular dialogue mechanisms in the critical areas of economics and trade, energy, and agriculture. The UK is currently Taiwan’s fourth-largest European trading partner, second-largest source of investment from Europe, and third-largest target for investment in Europe. Two years ago, Taiwan and the UK signed an ETP arrangement. This was particularly meaningful, as it was the first institutionalized economic and trade framework between Taiwan and a European country. Today, this arrangement is yielding further results. I am delighted that Taiwan and the UK have signed three pillars under the ETP covering investment, digital trade, and energy and net-zero. This will help promote bilateral economic and trade cooperation and advance industrial development on both sides. I also want to thank the UK government for its longstanding support for peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait. This month, the UK published its Strategic Defence Review 2025 and National Security Strategy 2025, which oppose any unilateral attempts to change the status quo across the Taiwan Strait. These not only demonstrate that Taiwan and the UK share similar goals but also show that security and prosperity in the Indo-Pacific region are inseparable from those of the transatlantic regions. In addition, last November, the House of Commons passed a motion which made clear that United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) Resolution 2758 neither established the sovereignty of the People’s Republic of China over Taiwan nor determined Taiwan’s status in the United Nations. The UK government also responded to the motion by publicly expressing for the first time its position on UNGA Resolution 2758, opposing any attempt to broaden the interpretation of the resolution to rewrite history. For this, on behalf of the people of Taiwan, I once again want to extend my deepest gratitude. Taiwan and the UK have the advantage of being highly complementary in the technology sector. In facing the restructuring of global supply chains and other international economic and trade developments, I believe that Taiwan and the UK are indispensable key partners for one another. I look forward to the UK publicly supporting Taiwan’s accession to the CPTPP so that together, we can create an economic and trade landscape in the Indo-Pacific characterized by shared prosperity and development. In closing, I wish Minister Alexander a pleasant and successful visit. And I hope he has the opportunity to visit Taiwan for personal travel in the future. Minister Alexander then delivered remarks, saying that it is a great personal honor to meet with everyone today to discuss further deepening the UK-Taiwan trade relationship and explore the many opportunities our two sides can pursue together. He mentioned that he traveled to Taiwan in 2022 when he was a private citizen, a visit he thoroughly enjoyed, so he is delighted to be back to see the strength of the UK-Taiwan relationship and the strengthening of that relationship. He said that relationship is built on mutual respect, democratic values, and a shared vision for open, resilient, and rules-based economic cooperation. As like-minded partners, he pointed out, our collaboration continues to grow across multiple sectors, and he is here today to further that momentum. Minister Alexander stated that on trade and investment, he is proud that this morning we signed the ETP Pillars on Investment, Digital Trade, Energy and Net Zero, which will provide a clear framework for our future cooperation and lay the foundation for expanded access and market-shaping engagement between our two economies. The minister said he believes that together with our annual trade talks, this partnership will help UK’s firms secure new commercial opportunities, improve regulatory alignment, and promote long-term investment in key growth areas, which in turn will also support Taiwan’s efforts to expand high-quality trade relationships with trusted partners. Minister Alexander said that President Lai’s promotion of the Five Trusted Industry Sectors and the UK’s recently published industrial and trade strategies are very well-aligned, as both cover clean energy and semiconductors as well as advanced manufacturing. He then provided an example, saying that both sides plan to invest in AI infrastructure and compute power-creating opportunities for great joint research in the future. By combining our strengths in these areas, he said, we can open the door to innovative collaboration and commercial success for both sides. He mentioned that yesterday he visited the Taiwan Space Agency, commenting that in sectors such as satellite technology, green energy, and cyber security, British expertise and trusted standards can provide meaningful solutions. Noting that President Lai spoke in his remarks of the broader challenge of peace and security in the region, Minister Alexander stated that the United Kingdom has, of course, also continued to affirm its commitment to peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait, along with its G7 partners. The UK-Taiwan relationship is strategic, enduring, and growing, he stated, and they reaffirm and remain firm in their longstanding position and confident in their ability to work together to support both prosperity and resilience in both of our societies. Minister Alexander said that, as Taiwan looks to diversify capital and build global partnerships, they believe the UK represents a strong and ambitious investment destination, particularly for Taiwanese companies at the very forefront of robotics, clean tech, and advanced industry. He pointed out that the UK’s markets are stable, open, and aligned with Taiwan’s vision of a high-tech, sustainable future, adding that he looks forward to our discussion on how we can further deepen our cooperation across all of these areas and more. The delegation also included Martin Kent, His Majesty’s Trade Commissioner for Asia Pacific at the UK Department for Business and Trade. The delegation was accompanied to the Presidential Office by British Office Taipei Representative Ruth Bradley-Jones.   

    Details
    2025-05-20
    President Lai interviewed by Nippon Television and Yomiuri TV
    In a recent interview on Nippon Television’s news zero program, President Lai Ching-te responded to questions from host Mr. Sakurai Sho and Yomiuri TV Shanghai Bureau Chief Watanabe Masayo on topics including reflections on his first year in office, cross-strait relations, China’s military threats, Taiwan-United States relations, and Taiwan-Japan relations. The interview was broadcast on the evening of May 19. During the interview, President Lai stated that China intends to change the world’s rules-based international order, and that if Taiwan were invaded, global supply chains would be disrupted. Therefore, he said, Taiwan will strengthen its national defense, prevent war by preparing for war, and achieve the goal of peace. The president also noted that Taiwan’s purpose for developing drones is based on national security and industrial needs, and that Taiwan hopes to collaborate with Japan. He then reiterated that China’s threats are an international problem, and expressed hope to work together with the US, Japan, and others in the global democratic community to prevent China from starting a war. Following is the text of the questions and the president’s responses: Q: How do you feel as you are about to round out your first year in office? President Lai: When I was young, I was determined to practice medicine and save lives. When I left medicine to go into politics, I was determined to transform Taiwan. And when I was sworn in as president on May 20 last year, I was determined to strengthen the nation. Time flies, and it has already been a year. Although the process has been very challenging, I am deeply honored to be a part of it. I am also profoundly grateful to our citizens for allowing me the opportunity to give back to our country. The future will certainly be full of more challenges, but I will do everything I can to unite the people and continue strengthening the nation. That is how I am feeling now. Q: We are now coming up on the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II, and over this period, we have often heard that conflict between Taiwan and the mainland is imminent. Do you personally believe that a cross-strait conflict could happen? President Lai: The international community is very much aware that China intends to replace the US and change the world’s rules-based international order, and annexing Taiwan is just the first step. So, as China’s military power grows stronger, some members of the international community are naturally on edge about whether a cross-strait conflict will break out. The international community must certainly do everything in its power to avoid a conflict in the Taiwan Strait; there is too great a cost. Besides causing direct disasters to both Taiwan and China, the impact on the global economy would be even greater, with estimated losses of US$10 trillion from war alone – that is roughly 10 percent of the global GDP. Additionally, 20 percent of global shipping passes through the Taiwan Strait and surrounding waters, so if a conflict breaks out in the strait, other countries including Japan and Korea would suffer a grave impact. For Japan and Korea, a quarter of external transit passes through the Taiwan Strait and surrounding waters, and a third of the various energy resources and minerals shipped back from other countries pass through said areas. If Taiwan were invaded, global supply chains would be disrupted, and therefore conflict in the Taiwan Strait must be avoided. Such a conflict is indeed avoidable. I am very thankful to Prime Minister of Japan Ishiba Shigeru and former Prime Ministers Abe Shinzo, Suga Yoshihide, and Kishida Fumio, as well as US President Donald Trump and former President Joe Biden, and the other G7 leaders, for continuing to emphasize at international venues that peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait are essential components for global security and prosperity. When everyone in the global democratic community works together, stacking up enough strength to make China’s objectives unattainable or to make the cost of invading Taiwan too high for it to bear, a conflict in the strait can naturally be avoided. Q: As you said, President Lai, maintaining peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait is also very important for other countries. How can war be avoided? What sort of countermeasures is Taiwan prepared to take to prevent war? President Lai: As Mr. Sakurai mentioned earlier, we are coming up on the 80th anniversary of the end of WWII. There are many lessons we can take from that war. First is that peace is priceless, and war has no winners. From the tragedies of WWII, there are lessons that humanity should learn. We must pursue peace, and not start wars blindly, as that would be a major disaster for humanity. In other words, we must be determined to safeguard peace. The second lesson is that we cannot be complacent toward authoritarian powers. If you give them an inch, they will take a mile. They will keep growing, and eventually, not only will peace be unattainable, but war will be inevitable. The third lesson is why WWII ended: It ended because different groups joined together in solidarity. Taiwan, Japan, and the Indo-Pacific region are all directly subjected to China’s threats, so we hope to be able to join together in cooperation. This is why we proposed the Four Pillars of Peace action plan. First, we will strengthen our national defense. Second, we will strengthen economic resilience. Third is standing shoulder to shoulder with the democratic community to demonstrate the strength of deterrence. Fourth is that as long as China treats Taiwan with parity and dignity, Taiwan is willing to conduct exchanges and cooperate with China, and seek peace and mutual prosperity. These four pillars can help us avoid war and achieve peace. That is to say, Taiwan hopes to achieve peace through strength, prevent war by preparing for war, keeping war from happening and pursuing the goal of peace. Q: Regarding drones, everyone knows that recently, Taiwan has been actively researching, developing, and introducing drones. Why do you need to actively research, develop, and introduce new drones at this time? President Lai: This is for two purposes. The first is to meet national security needs. The second is to meet industrial development needs. Because Taiwan, Japan, and the Philippines are all part of the first island chain, and we are all democratic nations, we cannot be like an authoritarian country like China, which has an unlimited national defense budget. In this kind of situation, island nations such as Taiwan, Japan, and the Philippines should leverage their own technologies to develop national defense methods that are asymmetric and utilize unmanned vehicles. In particular, from the Russo-Ukrainian War, we see that Ukraine has successfully utilized unmanned vehicles to protect itself and prevent Russia from unlimited invasion. In other words, the Russo-Ukrainian War has already proven the importance of drones. Therefore, the first purpose of developing drones is based on national security needs. Second, the world has already entered the era of smart technology. Whether generative, agentic, or physical, AI will continue to develop. In the future, cars and ships will also evolve into unmanned vehicles and unmanned boats, and there will be unmanned factories. Drones will even be able to assist with postal deliveries, or services like Uber, Uber Eats, and foodpanda, or agricultural irrigation and pesticide spraying. Therefore, in the future era of comprehensive smart technology, developing unmanned vehicles is a necessity. Taiwan, based on industrial needs, is actively planning the development of drones and unmanned vehicles. I would like to take this opportunity to express Taiwan’s hope to collaborate with Japan in the unmanned vehicle industry. Just as we do in the semiconductor industry, where Japan has raw materials, equipment, and technology, and Taiwan has wafer manufacturing, our two countries can cooperate. Japan is a technological power, and Taiwan also has significant technological strengths. If Taiwan and Japan work together, we will not only be able to safeguard peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait and security in the Indo-Pacific region, but it will also be very helpful for the industrial development of both countries. Q: The drones you just described probably include examples from the Russo-Ukrainian War. Taiwan and China are separated by the Taiwan Strait. Do our drones need to have cross-sea flight capabilities? President Lai: Taiwan does not intend to counterattack the mainland, and does not intend to invade any country. Taiwan’s drones are meant to protect our own nation and territory. Q: Former President Biden previously stated that US forces would assist Taiwan’s defense in the event of an attack. President Trump, however, has yet to clearly state that the US would help defend Taiwan. Do you think that in such an event, the US would help defend Taiwan? Or is Taiwan now trying to persuade the US? President Lai: Former President Biden and President Trump have answered questions from reporters. Although their responses were different, strong cooperation with Taiwan under the Biden administration has continued under the Trump administration; there has been no change. During President Trump’s first term, cooperation with Taiwan was broader and deeper compared to former President Barack Obama’s terms. After former President Biden took office, cooperation with Taiwan increased compared to President Trump’s first term. Now, during President Trump’s second term, cooperation with Taiwan is even greater than under former President Biden. Taiwan-US cooperation continues to grow stronger, and has not changed just because President Trump and former President Biden gave different responses to reporters. Furthermore, the Trump administration publicly stated that in the future, the US will shift its strategic focus from Europe to the Indo-Pacific. The US secretary of defense even publicly stated that the primary mission of the US is to prevent China from invading Taiwan, maintain stability in the Indo-Pacific, and thus maintain world peace. There is a saying in Taiwan that goes, “Help comes most to those who help themselves.” Before asking friends and allies for assistance in facing threats from China, Taiwan must first be determined and prepared to defend itself. This is Taiwan’s principle, and we are working in this direction, making all the necessary preparations to safeguard the nation. Q: I would like to ask you a question about Taiwan-Japan relations. After the Great East Japan Earthquake in 2011, you made an appeal to give Japan a great deal of assistance and care. In particular, you visited Sendai to offer condolences. Later, you also expressed condolences and concern after the earthquakes in Aomori and Kumamoto. What are your expectations for future Taiwan-Japan exchanges and development? President Lai: I come from Tainan, and my constituency is in Tainan. Tainan has very deep ties with Japan, and of course, Taiwan also has deep ties with Japan. However, among Taiwan’s 22 counties and cities, Tainan has the deepest relationship with Japan. I sincerely hope that both of you and your teams will have an opportunity to visit Tainan. I will introduce Tainan’s scenery, including architecture from the era of Japanese rule, Tainan’s cuisine, and unique aspects of Tainan society, and you can also see lifestyles and culture from the Showa era.  The Wushantou Reservoir in Tainan was completed by engineer Mr. Hatta Yoichi from Kanazawa, Japan and the team he led to Tainan after he graduated from then-Tokyo Imperial University. It has nearly a century of history and is still in use today. This reservoir, along with the 16,000-km-long Chianan Canal, transformed the 150,000-hectare Chianan Plain into Taiwan’s premier rice-growing area. It was that foundation in agriculture that enabled Taiwan to develop industry and the technology sector of today. The reservoir continues to supply water to Tainan Science Park. It is used by residents of Tainan, the agricultural sector, and industry, and even the technology sector in Xinshi Industrial Park, as well as Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company. Because of this, the people of Tainan are deeply grateful for Mr. Hatta and very friendly toward the people of Japan. A major earthquake, the largest in 50 years, struck Tainan on February 6, 2016, resulting in significant casualties. As mayor of Tainan at the time, I was extremely grateful to then-Prime Minister Abe, who sent five Japanese officials to the disaster site in Tainan the day after the earthquake. They were very thoughtful and asked what kind of assistance we needed from the Japanese government. They offered to provide help based on what we needed. I was deeply moved, as former Prime Minister Abe showed such care, going beyond the formality of just sending supplies that we may or may not have actually needed. Instead, the officials asked what we needed and then provided assistance based on those needs, which really moved me. Similarly, when the Great East Japan Earthquake of 2011 or the later Kumamoto earthquakes struck, the people of Tainan, under my leadership, naturally and dutifully expressed their support. Even earlier, when central Taiwan was hit by a major earthquake in 1999, Japan was the first country to deploy a rescue team to the disaster area. On February 6, 2018, after a major earthquake in Hualien, former Prime Minister Abe appeared in a video holding up a message of encouragement he had written in calligraphy saying “Remain strong, Taiwan.” All of Taiwan was deeply moved. Over the years, Taiwan and Japan have supported each other when earthquakes struck, and have forged bonds that are family-like, not just neighborly. This is truly valuable. In the future, I hope Taiwan and Japan can be like brothers, and that the peoples of Taiwan and Japan can treat one another like family. If Taiwan has a problem, then Japan has a problem; if Japan has a problem, then Taiwan has a problem. By caring for and helping each other, we can face various challenges and difficulties, and pursue a brighter future. Q: President Lai, you just used the phrase “If Taiwan has a problem, then Japan has a problem.” In the event that China attempts to invade Taiwan by force, what kind of response measures would you hope the US military and Japan’s Self-Defense Forces take? President Lai: As I just mentioned, annexing Taiwan is only China’s first step. Its ultimate objective is to change the rules-based international order. That being the case, China’s threats are an international problem. So, I would very much hope to work together with the US, Japan, and others in the global democratic community to prevent China from starting a war – prevention, after all, is more important than cure.

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News –

    July 22, 2025
  • MIL-OSI NGOs: Greenpeace calls for drastic cut in plastic production as new report reveals millions at risk of toxic air pollution exposure

    Source: Greenpeace Statement –

    Amsterdam, The Netherlands – A new Greenpeace International report released today reveals that over 50 million people in 11 countries [1] are at risk of exposure to hazardous air pollution from plastic linked petrochemical production. The findings intensify pressure on negotiators at the Global Plastics Treaty talks in Geneva to secure a treaty that tackles the problem at its source: plastic production.

    Graham Forbes, Global Plastics Campaign Lead for Greenpeace USA and Greenpeace Head of Delegation for the Global Plastics Treaty negotiation said: “What this report shows is that the plastics crisis is a public health emergency. The Global Plastics Treaty must deliver a 75% cut in plastic production by 2040 to reduce escalating threats to human and planetary health. People are being poisoned so fossil fuel and petrochemical companies can churn out more unnecessary plastic. Without a treaty that cuts production, the plastic crisis will only grow worse.”

    The report, Every Breath You Take: Air Pollution Risks from Petrochemicals Production for the Plastics Supply Chain, shifts the lens to midstream level plastic production—to the petrochemical plants that produce precursors to plastic and expose frontline communities living near to these facilities who are potentially facing exposure to dangerous air pollutants.

    During the production of feedstock, petrochemical facilities emit a suite of harmful airborne substances typically including Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs), nitrogen oxides (NOₓ), and sulfur oxides (SOₓ) and particulate matter (PM). Studies report higher concentrations of these pollutants near petrochemical facilities, with proximity linked to increased illness—raising a serious cause for concern.

    Key findings from the report include:

    • Over 51 million people in the 11 countries studied live within 10 km of plastics-linked petrochemical facilities; 16 million live within 5 km. In every country studied, residential areas lie within 10 km of plastic-linked petrochemical plants.
    • The United States has the highest number of people living at a distance that is linked to elevated risk—13 million, especially in Texas and Louisiana.
    • One in four people in the Netherlands live at a distance that is linked to elevated risk of exposure to air pollution emissions, including toxic emissions, from petrochemical plants. It has the highest proportion of its population at risk with 4.5 million people or 25.6% of the entire population within the exposure zones assessed in the analysis. The country with the second highest proportion is Switzerland at 10.9% of the population.
    • The pollution created by some petrochemical plants in the regions reviewed for the report is transboundary. Several plants are located in border zones, affecting communities in Austria, Poland, Singapore, Belgium, France and Germany.[2]
    • In documented case studies, communities near petrochemical facilities suffer disproportionately from cancer, respiratory disease, and premature death. The UN has labeled some of these areas “sacrifice zones.”

    The report also warns of industry plans to expand global plastic production through 2050, which would create more sacrifice zones, more waste exported to low-income countries, and more short-lived products driving the climate, health and waste crisis.

    The global Greenpeace network is demanding that the Global Plastics Treaty must reduce plastic production by at least 75% by 2040 to protect people’s health, the climate and the environment. The next round of negotiations will happen on August 5 to 14, 2025 in Geneva, Switzerland.

    ENDS

    Full report: Every Breath You Take: Air Pollution Risks from Petrochemicals Production for the Plastics Supply Chain

    Photos and videos can be accessed in the Greenpeace Media Library. 

    Interactive maps of petrochemical production zones

    Notes: 

    [1] The report, Every Breath You Take: Air Pollution Risks from Petrochemicals Production for the Plastics Supply Chain, identified the locations of petrochemical facilities linked to plastics in 11 countries: Philippines, Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia, South Korea, Canada, USA, Germany, United Kingdom, Switzerland, and the Netherlands. The countries were selected because of their significant petrochemical presence or association with major plastic-related concerns.

    [2] The transboundary zones include populations in Austria and Poland (from German facilities), Singapore (from Malaysian facilities) Belgium and Germany (from Dutch facilities) France and Germany (from Swiss facilities).

    Contacts:

    Angelica Carballo Pago, Global Plastics Campaign Media Lead, Greenpeace USA, +63 917 1124492, [email protected]

    Greenpeace International Press Desk, +31 (0) 20 718 2470 (available 24 hours), [email protected]

    MIL OSI NGO –

    July 22, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – G7 declaration on the minimum international taxation regime and advantages provided to US-based multinationals – E-002858/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002858/2025
    to the Council
    Rule 144
    Fabio De Masi (NI)

    The Commission has recently argued that the G7’s declaration on the treatment reserved for the United States as regards the minimum international taxation of multinationals should be automatically translated into EU law, without requiring amendments to EU law. Adopting the declaration would mean that US multinationals would continue to benefit from the ‘safe harbour’ mechanism and would therefore not be subject to the 15 % minimum tax requirement. This would be achieved through the establishment of a side-by-side system. This system could also give the United States a slight competitive advantage over European companies.

    I would therefore like to ask the following questions:

    • 1.Is there agreement among the Member States regarding the adoption of the G7 declaration?
    • 2.Was there a vote in the Council on approving the G7 declaration?
    • 3.Are there specific measures under discussion that could offset the potential competitive disadvantage associated with the side-by-side system?

    Submitted: 14.7.2025

    Last updated: 22 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

    July 22, 2025
  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: National security powers to be updated to reduce the burden on businesses

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    Press release

    National security powers to be updated to reduce the burden on businesses

    Investment security rules under the National Security and Investment (NSI) Act 2021 will be simplified to ease the burden on businesses as part of the Plan for Change.

    • Plans to reduce unnecessary red tape for businesses by ensuring mandatory notifications are no longer needed for certain internal reorganisations and the appointment of liquidators 
    • New consultation will put businesses at the heart of potential changes to the sectors facing the greatest scrutiny by the government’s investment security powers
    • Semiconductors, Critical Minerals carved out into standalone sectors and Water to be considered for addition to list of sensitive sectors 
    • NSIA Annual Report shows just 4.5% of notifications were called in for review, with the vast majority cleared to proceed in 30 days  

    Investment security rules under the National Security and Investment (NSI) Act 2021 will be simplified to ease the burden on businesses as part of the Plan for Change. 

    The changes, currently being developed, will when they come into force reduce unnecessary bureaucracy for businesses, no longer requiring them to notify the Cabinet Office’s Investment Security Unit when undertaking certain types of internal reorganisations or appointing liquidators, special administrators and official receivers. 

    Analysis has shown these types of transactions rarely warrant investigation. Simplifying the rules will ease the regulatory burden and help the government focus its attention on the deals presenting greater risk to national security.

    Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, Pat McFadden said: 

    The government has been clear about our ambition to cut red tape for businesses, while taking firm action to protect national security as we deliver the Plan for Change. 

    Data shows our investment security powers are working well, but there’s more we can do to ensure our tool kit keeps pace with the modern economy. We’re taking action to hone the type of transactions facing the greatest scrutiny, as well as consulting on updates to the sectors of the economy specified in the legislation. Businesses are at the heart of these plans and I look forward to engaging widely in the weeks ahead.

    The announcement comes as the government also publishes a new consultation—due to launch on 22 July and conclude on 14 October—-on separate plans to update the sectors of the economy subject to greater scrutiny under the National Security and Investment Act 2021. 

    Acquirers of businesses operating in seventeen sensitive sectors must currently notify the Investment Security Unit about relevant acquisitions before the deal can be completed. These sectors were first defined in 2021 and have not been updated since. 

    Building on business feedback, and to improve clarity and bring the sectors up to date with the latest economic and technological developments, the government is proposing creating new standalone categories for Semiconductors and Critical Minerals, which currently fall under the Advanced Materials sector. Computing Hardware, which is currently a standalone sector, would move under the Semiconductors sector. 

    Pat McFadden has also requested businesses’ views on bringing certain deals in the water sector into scope of the NSI Act’s mandatory notification requirements. This new requirement, while not expected to affect large numbers of deals, reflects increasing risks to the sector’s resilience in a growing threat landscape.

    Alongside the reforms and consultation, the Cabinet Office is also publishing the National Security and Investment Act Annual Report. This sets out the Investment Security Unit’s activity between 2024-2025. 

    It shows that the government saw an increase in the number of notifications received year on year, rising from 906 to 1,143.

    Similar to last year, only 4.5% of notified acquisitions reviewed were called in for further assessment, with the vast majority of businesses notified within 30 working days that no further action would be taken.

    The government issued 17 final orders: 16 allowing the acquisitions to proceed subject to conditions and one requiring divestment. 

    Like last year, the largest proportion of notifications involved acquisitions in the Defence, Critical Suppliers to Government and Military & Dual Use areas of the economy, and acquirers associated with the UK, followed by the US. 

    Of the 17 final orders issued, the largest number involved acquirers associated with the UK, followed by acquirers associated with China and acquirers associated with the USA. Defence and Military & Dual Use acquisitions also accounted for the largest number of final orders.

    Share this page

    The following links open in a new tab

    • Share on Facebook (opens in new tab)
    • Share on Twitter (opens in new tab)

    Updates to this page

    Published 22 July 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom –

    July 22, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: President Lai meets official delegation from European Parliament’s Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield

    Source: Republic of China Taiwan

    Details
    2025-07-17
    President Lai meets President of Guatemalan Congress Nery Abilio Ramos y Ramos  
    On the morning of July 17, President Lai Ching-te met with a delegation led by Nery Abilio Ramos y Ramos, the president of the Congress of the Republic of Guatemala. In remarks, President Lai thanked Congress President Ramos and the Guatemalan Congress for their support for Taiwan, and noted that official diplomatic relations between Taiwan and Guatemala go back more than 90 years. As important partners in the global democratic community, the president said, the two nations will continue moving forward together in joint defense of the values of democracy and freedom, and will cooperate to promote regional and global prosperity and development. A translation of President Lai’s remarks follows:  I recall that when Congress President Ramos visited Taiwan in July last year, he put forward many ideas about how our countries could promote bilateral cooperation and exchanges. Now, a year later, he is leading another cross-party delegation from the Guatemalan Congress on a visit, demonstrating support for Taiwan and continuing to help deepen our diplomatic ties. In addition to extending a sincere welcome to the distinguished delegation members who have traveled so far to be here, I would also like to express our concern and condolences for everyone in Guatemala affected by the earthquake that struck earlier this month. We hope that the recovery effort is going smoothly. Official diplomatic relations between Taiwan and Guatemala go back more than 90 years. In such fields as healthcare, agriculture, education, and women’s empowerment, we have continually strengthened our cooperation to benefit our peoples. Just last month, Guatemala’s President Bernardo Arévalo and the First Lady led a delegation on a state visit to Taiwan. President Arévalo and I signed a letter of intent for semiconductor cooperation, and also witnessed the signing of cooperation documents to establish a political consultation mechanism and continue to promote bilateral investment. This has laid an even sounder foundation for bilateral exchanges and cooperation, and will help enhance both countries’ international competitiveness. Taiwan is currently running a semiconductor vocational training program, helping Guatemala cultivate semiconductor talent and develop its tech industry, and demonstrating our determination to share experience with democratic partners. At the same time, we continue to assist Taiwanese businesses in their efforts to develop overseas markets with Guatemala as an important base, spurring industrial development in both countries and increasing economic and trade benefits. I want to thank Congress President Ramos and the Guatemalan Congress for their continued support for Taiwan’s international participation. Representing the Guatemalan Congress, Congress President Ramos has signed resolutions in support of Taiwan, and has also issued statements addressing China’s misinterpretation of United Nations General Assembly Resolution 2758. Taiwan and Guatemala, as important partners in the global democratic community, will continue moving forward together in joint defense of the values of democracy and freedom, and will cooperate to promote regional and global prosperity and development. Congress President Ramos then delivered remarks, first noting that the members of the delegation are not only from different parties, but also represent different classes, cultures, professions, and departments, which shows that the diplomatic ties between Guatemala and the Republic of China (Taiwan) are based on firm friendships at all levels and in all fields. Noting that this was his second time to visit Taiwan and meet with President Lai, Congress President Ramos thanked the government of Taiwan for its warm hospitality. With the international situation growing more complex by the day, he said, Guatemala highly values its longstanding friendship and cooperative ties with Taiwan, and hopes that both sides can continue to deepen their cooperation in such areas as the economy, technology, education, agriculture, and culture, and work together to spur sustainable development in each of our countries. Congress President Ramos said that the way the Taiwan government looks after the well-being of its people is an excellent model for how other countries should promote national development and social well-being. Accordingly, he said, the Guatemalan Congress has stood for justice and, for a second time, adopted a resolution backing Taiwan’s participation in the World Health Assembly. Regarding President Arévalo’s state visit to Taiwan the previous month, Congress President Ramos commented that this high-level interaction has undoubtedly strengthened the diplomatic ties between Taiwan and Guatemala and led to more opportunities for cooperation. Congress President Ramos emphasized that democracy, freedom, and human rights are universal values that bind Taiwan and Guatemala together, and that he is confident the two countries’ diplomatic ties will continue to grow deeper. In closing, on behalf of the Republic of Guatemala, Congress President Ramos presented President Lai with a Chinese translation of the resolution that the Guatemalan Congress proposed to the UN in support of Taiwan’s participation in international organizations, demonstrating the staunch bonds of friendship between the two countries. The delegation was accompanied to the Presidential Office by Guatemala Ambassador Luis Raúl Estévez López.  

    Details
    2025-07-08
    President Lai meets delegation led by Foreign Minister Jean-Victor Harvel Jean-Baptiste of Republic of Haiti
    On the morning of July 8, President Lai Ching-te met with a delegation led by Minister of Foreign Affairs Jean-Victor Harvel Jean-Baptiste of the Republic of Haiti and his wife. In remarks, President Lai noted that our two countries will soon mark the 70th anniversary of diplomatic relations and that our exchanges have been fruitful in important areas such as public security, educational cooperation, and infrastructure. The president stated that Taiwan will continue to work together with Haiti to promote the development of medical and health care, food security, and construction that benefits people’s livelihoods. The president thanked Haiti for supporting Taiwan’s international participation and expressed hope that both countries will continue to support each other, deepen cooperation, and face various challenges together. A translation of President Lai’s remarks follows: I am delighted to meet and exchange ideas with Minister Jean-Baptiste, his wife, and our distinguished guests. Minister Jean-Baptiste is the highest-ranking official from Haiti to visit Taiwan since former President Jovenel Moïse visited in 2018, demonstrating the importance that the Haitian government attaches to our bilateral diplomatic ties. On behalf of the Republic of China (Taiwan), I extend a sincere welcome. Next year marks the 70th anniversary of the establishment of diplomatic ties between our two countries. Our bilateral exchanges have been fruitful in important areas such as public security, educational cooperation, and infrastructure. Over the past few years, Haiti has faced challenges in such areas as food supply and healthcare. Taiwan will continue to work together with Haiti through various cooperative programs to promote the development of medical and health care, food security, and construction that benefits people’s livelihoods. I want to thank the government of Haiti and Minister Jean-Baptiste for speaking out in support of Taiwan on the international stage for many years. Minister Jean-Baptiste’s personal letter to the World Health Organization Secretariat in May this year and Minister of Public Health and Population Bertrand Sinal’s public statement during the World Health Assembly both affirmed Taiwan’s efforts and contributions to global public health and supported Taiwan’s international participation, for which we are very grateful. I hope that Taiwan and Haiti will continue to support each other and deepen cooperation. I believe that Minister Jean-Baptiste’s visit will open up more opportunities for cooperation for both countries, helping Taiwan and Haiti face various challenges together. In closing, I once again offer a sincere welcome to the delegation led by Minister Jean-Baptiste, and ask him to convey greetings from Taiwan to Prime Minister Alix Didier Fils-Aimé and the members of the Transitional Presidential Council. Minister Jean-Baptiste then delivered remarks, saying that he is extremely honored to visit Taiwan and reaffirm the solid and friendly cooperative relationship based on mutual respect between the Republic of Haiti and the Republic of China (Taiwan), which will soon mark its 70th anniversary. He also brought greetings to President Lai from Haiti’s Transitional Presidential Council and Prime Minister Fils-Aimé. Minister Jean-Baptiste emphasized that over the past few decades, despite the great geographical distance and developmental and cultural differences between our two countries, we have nevertheless established a firm friendship and demonstrated to the world the progress resulting from the mutual assistance and cooperation between our peoples. Minister Jean-Baptiste pointed out that our two countries cooperate closely in agriculture, health, education, and community development and have achieved concrete results. Taiwan’s voice, he said, is thus essential for the people of Haiti. He noted that Taiwan also plays an important role in peace and innovation and actively participates in global cooperative efforts. Pointing out that the world is currently facing significant challenges and that Haiti is experiencing its most difficult period in history, Minister Jean-Baptiste said that at this time, Taiwan and Haiti need to unite, help each other, and jointly think about how to move forward and deepen bilateral relations to benefit the peoples of both countries. Minister Jean-Baptiste said that he is pleased that throughout our solid and friendly diplomatic relationship, both countries have demonstrated mutual trust, mutual respect, and the values we jointly defend. He then stated his belief that Haiti and Taiwan will together create a cooperation model and future that are sincere, friendly, and sustainable. The delegation was accompanied to the Presidential Office by Chargé d’Affaires a.i. Francilien Victorin of the Embassy of the Republic of Haiti in Taiwan.

    Details
    2025-07-01
    President Lai meets delegation from 2025 Taiwan International Ocean Forum
    On the afternoon of July 1, President Lai Ching-te met with a delegation from the 2025 Taiwan International Ocean Forum (TIOF). In remarks, President Lai noted that the people of Taiwan will continue to work with democratic partners throughout the world in a maritime spirit of freedom and openness to contribute to ocean governance and jointly ensure maritime security. He expressed hope that their visit will help forge stronger friendships between Taiwan and international maritime partners, so that all can work together to spur shared maritime prosperity and sustainable development for the next generation. A translation of President Lai’s remarks follows: I want to thank our guests for coming here to the Presidential Office. The 2025 TIOF will take place tomorrow and the day after, and I thank you all for making the long trip to Taiwan to attend the event and share your valuable insights and experiences. This year’s forum will focus on strategies for strengthening maritime security and pathways to achieving a sustainable blue economy. By attending this forum, our guests are highlighting their commitment to safeguarding the oceans, and beyond that, taking concrete action to demonstrate support for Taiwan. I once again offer deepest gratitude on behalf of the people of Taiwan. Taiwan holds a key position on the first island chain, is one of the world’s top 10 shipping nations, and accounts for close to 10 percent of global container shipping by volume. As such, Taiwan occupies a unique and important position in maritime strategy. For Taiwan, the ocean is more than just a basis for survival and development; it is also an important driver of national prosperity. In my inaugural address last year, I spoke of a threefold approach to further Taiwan’s development. One of these involves further developing our strengths as a maritime nation. Our government must actively help deepen our connections with the ocean, and must continue to promote green shipping, a sustainable fishing industry, marine renewable energy, and other forms of industrial transformation. It must also make use of marine technology and digital innovation to create a new paradigm that balances environmental, economic, and social inclusion concerns. This will help enhance Taiwan’s responsibilities and competitiveness as a maritime nation. Taiwan is surrounded by ocean, and our territorial waters are a natural protective barrier. However, continued gray-zone aggression from China creates serious threats and challenges to peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait. Our government continues to invest resources to deal with increasingly complex maritime security issues. In addition to building coast guard patrol vessels, we must also step up efforts to build underwater, surface, and airborne unmanned vehicles and smart reconnaissance equipment, so as to demonstrate Taiwan’s determination to defend democracy and freedom and commitment to maintaining peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait. Oceans are Taiwan’s roots, and provide the channels by which we engage with the world. The people of Taiwan will continue to work with democratic partners throughout the world in a maritime spirit of freedom and openness to contribute to ocean governance and jointly ensure maritime security. The TIOF was first launched in 2020, and has now become an important platform for enhancement of cooperation between Taiwan and other countries. I hope that our distinguished guests will reap great benefits at this year’s forum, and further hope that this visit will help forge stronger friendships between Taiwan and international maritime partners, so that all can work together to spur shared maritime prosperity and sustainable development for the next generation. Chairman of The Washington Times Thomas McDevitt, a member of the delegation, then delivered remarks, noting first that July 4th, this Friday, is Independence Day in America. Independence is a sacred, powerful word which has great meaning in this part of the world, he said. Chairman McDevitt indicated that Taiwan has truly become a global beacon of democracy and a key partner for many nations. He then quoted President Lai’s 2024 inaugural address: “We will work together to combat disinformation, strengthen democratic resilience, address challenges, and allow Taiwan to become the MVP of the democratic world.” Chairman McDevitt went on to say that he appreciated the president’s speech with regard to his philosophical depth, sensitivity, and both moral and political clarity. He said that he was deeply moved by the speech, but within a few days of it, China responded with military activities and many threats. The chairman then emphasized that we are in a civilization crisis. Chairman McDevitt mentioned that President Lai has begun a series of 10 lectures, and remarked that they would help the world to understand the identity and the nature of Taiwan, as well as the situation we are in in the world. On behalf of all the delegation, Chairman McDevitt thanked the president for his leadership in dealing with these issues thoughtfully. Chairman McDevitt concluded with a line from the Old Testament which states that if the people have no vision, they will perish. He said that he believes Taiwan’s president has led the people of Taiwan, and the world, with a vision of how to navigate this great civilization crisis together. The delegation also included Members of the Japanese House of Representatives Kikawada Hitoshi, Aoyama Yamato, and Genma Kentaro, and Member of Parliament of the United Kingdom Gavin Williamson.

    Details
    2025-06-30
    President Lai meets Minister of State at UK Department for Business and Trade Douglas Alexander  
    On the morning of June 30, President Lai Ching-te met with Douglas Alexander, Minister of State at the Department for Business and Trade of the United Kingdom. In remarks, President Lai thanked the UK government for its longstanding support for peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait, demonstrating that Taiwan and the UK share similar goals. Noting that two years ago, Taiwan and the UK signed an enhanced trade partnership (ETP) arrangement, the president said that today Taiwan and the UK have signed three pillars under the ETP, which will help promote bilateral economic and trade cooperation. He expressed hope of the UK publicly supporting Taiwan’s accession to the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) so that together we can create an economic and trade landscape in the Indo-Pacific characterized by shared prosperity and development. A translation of President Lai’s remarks follows: First, on behalf of the people of Taiwan, I extend a warm welcome to Minister Alexander and wish a fruitful outcome for the 27th round of Taiwan-UK trade talks later today. Taiwan-UK relations have grown closer in recent years. We have not only continued to strengthen cooperation in such fields as offshore wind power, innovative technologies, and culture and education but also have established regular dialogue mechanisms in the critical areas of economics and trade, energy, and agriculture. The UK is currently Taiwan’s fourth-largest European trading partner, second-largest source of investment from Europe, and third-largest target for investment in Europe. Two years ago, Taiwan and the UK signed an ETP arrangement. This was particularly meaningful, as it was the first institutionalized economic and trade framework between Taiwan and a European country. Today, this arrangement is yielding further results. I am delighted that Taiwan and the UK have signed three pillars under the ETP covering investment, digital trade, and energy and net-zero. This will help promote bilateral economic and trade cooperation and advance industrial development on both sides. I also want to thank the UK government for its longstanding support for peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait. This month, the UK published its Strategic Defence Review 2025 and National Security Strategy 2025, which oppose any unilateral attempts to change the status quo across the Taiwan Strait. These not only demonstrate that Taiwan and the UK share similar goals but also show that security and prosperity in the Indo-Pacific region are inseparable from those of the transatlantic regions. In addition, last November, the House of Commons passed a motion which made clear that United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) Resolution 2758 neither established the sovereignty of the People’s Republic of China over Taiwan nor determined Taiwan’s status in the United Nations. The UK government also responded to the motion by publicly expressing for the first time its position on UNGA Resolution 2758, opposing any attempt to broaden the interpretation of the resolution to rewrite history. For this, on behalf of the people of Taiwan, I once again want to extend my deepest gratitude. Taiwan and the UK have the advantage of being highly complementary in the technology sector. In facing the restructuring of global supply chains and other international economic and trade developments, I believe that Taiwan and the UK are indispensable key partners for one another. I look forward to the UK publicly supporting Taiwan’s accession to the CPTPP so that together, we can create an economic and trade landscape in the Indo-Pacific characterized by shared prosperity and development. In closing, I wish Minister Alexander a pleasant and successful visit. And I hope he has the opportunity to visit Taiwan for personal travel in the future. Minister Alexander then delivered remarks, saying that it is a great personal honor to meet with everyone today to discuss further deepening the UK-Taiwan trade relationship and explore the many opportunities our two sides can pursue together. He mentioned that he traveled to Taiwan in 2022 when he was a private citizen, a visit he thoroughly enjoyed, so he is delighted to be back to see the strength of the UK-Taiwan relationship and the strengthening of that relationship. He said that relationship is built on mutual respect, democratic values, and a shared vision for open, resilient, and rules-based economic cooperation. As like-minded partners, he pointed out, our collaboration continues to grow across multiple sectors, and he is here today to further that momentum. Minister Alexander stated that on trade and investment, he is proud that this morning we signed the ETP Pillars on Investment, Digital Trade, Energy and Net Zero, which will provide a clear framework for our future cooperation and lay the foundation for expanded access and market-shaping engagement between our two economies. The minister said he believes that together with our annual trade talks, this partnership will help UK’s firms secure new commercial opportunities, improve regulatory alignment, and promote long-term investment in key growth areas, which in turn will also support Taiwan’s efforts to expand high-quality trade relationships with trusted partners. Minister Alexander said that President Lai’s promotion of the Five Trusted Industry Sectors and the UK’s recently published industrial and trade strategies are very well-aligned, as both cover clean energy and semiconductors as well as advanced manufacturing. He then provided an example, saying that both sides plan to invest in AI infrastructure and compute power-creating opportunities for great joint research in the future. By combining our strengths in these areas, he said, we can open the door to innovative collaboration and commercial success for both sides. He mentioned that yesterday he visited the Taiwan Space Agency, commenting that in sectors such as satellite technology, green energy, and cyber security, British expertise and trusted standards can provide meaningful solutions. Noting that President Lai spoke in his remarks of the broader challenge of peace and security in the region, Minister Alexander stated that the United Kingdom has, of course, also continued to affirm its commitment to peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait, along with its G7 partners. The UK-Taiwan relationship is strategic, enduring, and growing, he stated, and they reaffirm and remain firm in their longstanding position and confident in their ability to work together to support both prosperity and resilience in both of our societies. Minister Alexander said that, as Taiwan looks to diversify capital and build global partnerships, they believe the UK represents a strong and ambitious investment destination, particularly for Taiwanese companies at the very forefront of robotics, clean tech, and advanced industry. He pointed out that the UK’s markets are stable, open, and aligned with Taiwan’s vision of a high-tech, sustainable future, adding that he looks forward to our discussion on how we can further deepen our cooperation across all of these areas and more. The delegation also included Martin Kent, His Majesty’s Trade Commissioner for Asia Pacific at the UK Department for Business and Trade. The delegation was accompanied to the Presidential Office by British Office Taipei Representative Ruth Bradley-Jones.   

    Details
    2025-06-27
    President Lai confers decoration on former Japan-Taiwan Exchange Association Chairman Ohashi Mitsuo
    On the morning of June 27, President Lai Ching-te conferred the Order of Brilliant Star with Grand Cordon upon former Chairman of the Japan-Taiwan Exchange Association Ohashi Mitsuo in recognition of his firm convictions and tireless efforts in promoting Taiwan-Japan exchanges. In remarks, President Lai stated that Chairman Ohashi cares for Taiwan like a family member, and expressed hope that Taiwan and Japan continue to deepen their partnership, bring about the early signing of an economic partnership agreement (EPA), and jointly build secure and stable non-red supply chains as we boost the resilience and competitiveness of our economies and jointly safeguard the values of freedom and democracy. A translation of President Lai’s remarks follows: Every meeting I have with Chairman Ohashi, with whom I have worked side by side for many years, is warm and friendly. I recall that when we met last year, Chairman Ohashi said that he often thinks about what Japan can do for Taiwan and what Taiwan can do for Japan, and that it is that mutual concern that makes us so close. This was a truly moving statement illustrating the relationship between Taiwan and Japan. Chairman Ohashi has also said numerous times that our bilateral relations may very well be the best in the entire world, and that in fact they may serve as a model to other countries. Indeed, Chairman Ohashi is himself an exemplary model for friendly relations between Taiwan and Japan. His spirit of always working tirelessly to promote Taiwan-Japan exchanges is truly admirable. Assuming the position of chairman of the Japan-Taiwan Exchange Association in 2011, he served during the terms of former Presidents Ma Ying-jeou and Tsai Ing-wen, continuously making positive contributions to Taiwan-Japan relations. Over these past 14 years, Taiwan and Japan have signed over 50 major agreements, spanning the economy and trade, fisheries, and taxes, among other areas. In 2017, the Taiwan-Japan Relations Association and the Japan-Taiwan Exchange Association underwent name changes, strengthening the essence and significance of Taiwan-Japan relations. These great achievements were all made possible thanks to the firm convictions and tireless efforts of Chairman Ohashi. On behalf of the people of Taiwan, I am delighted to confer upon Chairman Ohashi the Order of Brilliant Star with Grand Cordon to express our deepest thanks for his outstanding contributions. Chairman Ohashi is not just a good friend of Taiwan, but someone who cares for Taiwan like a family member. When a major earthquake struck in 2016, he personally went to Tainan to assess the situation and meet with the city government. This outpouring of friendship and support across borders was deeply moving. As we look to the future, I hope that Taiwan and Japan can continue to deepen our partnership. In addition to bringing about the early signing of an EPA, I also hope that we can expand collaboration in key areas such as semiconductors, energy, and AI, continue building secure and stable non-red supply chains, and boost the resilience and competitiveness of our economies as well as peace and stability in the Indo-Pacific. As Chairman Ohashi has said, the close bilateral relationship between Taiwan and Japan is one the world can be proud of. I would like to thank him once again for his contributions to deepening Taiwan-Japan ties. Taiwan will continue to forge ahead side by side with Japan, jointly safeguarding the values of freedom and democracy and mutually advancing prosperous development. I wish Chairman Ohashi good health, happiness, peace, and success in his future endeavors, and invite him to return to Taiwan often to visit old friends. Chairman Ohashi then delivered remarks, first thanking President Lai for his kind words. He stated that the Taiwan-Japan relationship is not only worthy of praise; it can also serve as a superb model in the world for bilateral relations that is worthy of study by other countries. He added that this is the result of the collective efforts of President Lai as well as many other individuals. Chairman Ohashi said that the current international situation is rather severe, with wars and conflicts occurring between many neighboring countries. He said that there is a growing trend of nuclear weapon proliferation, emphasizing that use of such weapons would cause significant harm between nations. He also pointed out that some countries even use nuclear weapons as a threat, leading to instability and impacting the global situation. Chairman Ohashi said that neither Taiwan nor Japan possesses nuclear weapons, which is something to be proud of. That is why, he said, we can declare that a world without nuclear weapons is a peaceful world. He also mentioned that during his tenure as chairman of the Japan-Taiwan Exchange Association, he consistently upheld this principle in his work. Chairman Ohashi said that the mission of the World Federalist Movement (WFM) is to promote world peace. He said that the WFM has branches in countries worldwide, with the WFM of Japan being one of the most prominent, and that it also aspires to achieve the goal of world peace. Having served as chairman of the Japan-Taiwan Exchange Association for 14 years, he said, he is now stepping down from this role and will serve as the chairman of the WFM of Japan, aiming to promote peace in countries around the world. Chairman Ohashi said that both Taiwan and Japan can take pride in our friendly bilateral relationship, emphasizing that if the good relationship between Japan and Taiwan could be offered as an example to countries around the world, there would be no more wars. He expressed his sincere hope that under President Lai’s leadership, Taiwan and Japan can work together to jointly promote world peace. Also in attendance at the ceremony was Japan-Taiwan Exchange Association Taipei Office Chief Representative Katayama Kazuyuki.

    Details
    2025-05-20
    President Lai interviewed by Nippon Television and Yomiuri TV
    In a recent interview on Nippon Television’s news zero program, President Lai Ching-te responded to questions from host Mr. Sakurai Sho and Yomiuri TV Shanghai Bureau Chief Watanabe Masayo on topics including reflections on his first year in office, cross-strait relations, China’s military threats, Taiwan-United States relations, and Taiwan-Japan relations. The interview was broadcast on the evening of May 19. During the interview, President Lai stated that China intends to change the world’s rules-based international order, and that if Taiwan were invaded, global supply chains would be disrupted. Therefore, he said, Taiwan will strengthen its national defense, prevent war by preparing for war, and achieve the goal of peace. The president also noted that Taiwan’s purpose for developing drones is based on national security and industrial needs, and that Taiwan hopes to collaborate with Japan. He then reiterated that China’s threats are an international problem, and expressed hope to work together with the US, Japan, and others in the global democratic community to prevent China from starting a war. Following is the text of the questions and the president’s responses: Q: How do you feel as you are about to round out your first year in office? President Lai: When I was young, I was determined to practice medicine and save lives. When I left medicine to go into politics, I was determined to transform Taiwan. And when I was sworn in as president on May 20 last year, I was determined to strengthen the nation. Time flies, and it has already been a year. Although the process has been very challenging, I am deeply honored to be a part of it. I am also profoundly grateful to our citizens for allowing me the opportunity to give back to our country. The future will certainly be full of more challenges, but I will do everything I can to unite the people and continue strengthening the nation. That is how I am feeling now. Q: We are now coming up on the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II, and over this period, we have often heard that conflict between Taiwan and the mainland is imminent. Do you personally believe that a cross-strait conflict could happen? President Lai: The international community is very much aware that China intends to replace the US and change the world’s rules-based international order, and annexing Taiwan is just the first step. So, as China’s military power grows stronger, some members of the international community are naturally on edge about whether a cross-strait conflict will break out. The international community must certainly do everything in its power to avoid a conflict in the Taiwan Strait; there is too great a cost. Besides causing direct disasters to both Taiwan and China, the impact on the global economy would be even greater, with estimated losses of US$10 trillion from war alone – that is roughly 10 percent of the global GDP. Additionally, 20 percent of global shipping passes through the Taiwan Strait and surrounding waters, so if a conflict breaks out in the strait, other countries including Japan and Korea would suffer a grave impact. For Japan and Korea, a quarter of external transit passes through the Taiwan Strait and surrounding waters, and a third of the various energy resources and minerals shipped back from other countries pass through said areas. If Taiwan were invaded, global supply chains would be disrupted, and therefore conflict in the Taiwan Strait must be avoided. Such a conflict is indeed avoidable. I am very thankful to Prime Minister of Japan Ishiba Shigeru and former Prime Ministers Abe Shinzo, Suga Yoshihide, and Kishida Fumio, as well as US President Donald Trump and former President Joe Biden, and the other G7 leaders, for continuing to emphasize at international venues that peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait are essential components for global security and prosperity. When everyone in the global democratic community works together, stacking up enough strength to make China’s objectives unattainable or to make the cost of invading Taiwan too high for it to bear, a conflict in the strait can naturally be avoided. Q: As you said, President Lai, maintaining peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait is also very important for other countries. How can war be avoided? What sort of countermeasures is Taiwan prepared to take to prevent war? President Lai: As Mr. Sakurai mentioned earlier, we are coming up on the 80th anniversary of the end of WWII. There are many lessons we can take from that war. First is that peace is priceless, and war has no winners. From the tragedies of WWII, there are lessons that humanity should learn. We must pursue peace, and not start wars blindly, as that would be a major disaster for humanity. In other words, we must be determined to safeguard peace. The second lesson is that we cannot be complacent toward authoritarian powers. If you give them an inch, they will take a mile. They will keep growing, and eventually, not only will peace be unattainable, but war will be inevitable. The third lesson is why WWII ended: It ended because different groups joined together in solidarity. Taiwan, Japan, and the Indo-Pacific region are all directly subjected to China’s threats, so we hope to be able to join together in cooperation. This is why we proposed the Four Pillars of Peace action plan. First, we will strengthen our national defense. Second, we will strengthen economic resilience. Third is standing shoulder to shoulder with the democratic community to demonstrate the strength of deterrence. Fourth is that as long as China treats Taiwan with parity and dignity, Taiwan is willing to conduct exchanges and cooperate with China, and seek peace and mutual prosperity. These four pillars can help us avoid war and achieve peace. That is to say, Taiwan hopes to achieve peace through strength, prevent war by preparing for war, keeping war from happening and pursuing the goal of peace. Q: Regarding drones, everyone knows that recently, Taiwan has been actively researching, developing, and introducing drones. Why do you need to actively research, develop, and introduce new drones at this time? President Lai: This is for two purposes. The first is to meet national security needs. The second is to meet industrial development needs. Because Taiwan, Japan, and the Philippines are all part of the first island chain, and we are all democratic nations, we cannot be like an authoritarian country like China, which has an unlimited national defense budget. In this kind of situation, island nations such as Taiwan, Japan, and the Philippines should leverage their own technologies to develop national defense methods that are asymmetric and utilize unmanned vehicles. In particular, from the Russo-Ukrainian War, we see that Ukraine has successfully utilized unmanned vehicles to protect itself and prevent Russia from unlimited invasion. In other words, the Russo-Ukrainian War has already proven the importance of drones. Therefore, the first purpose of developing drones is based on national security needs. Second, the world has already entered the era of smart technology. Whether generative, agentic, or physical, AI will continue to develop. In the future, cars and ships will also evolve into unmanned vehicles and unmanned boats, and there will be unmanned factories. Drones will even be able to assist with postal deliveries, or services like Uber, Uber Eats, and foodpanda, or agricultural irrigation and pesticide spraying. Therefore, in the future era of comprehensive smart technology, developing unmanned vehicles is a necessity. Taiwan, based on industrial needs, is actively planning the development of drones and unmanned vehicles. I would like to take this opportunity to express Taiwan’s hope to collaborate with Japan in the unmanned vehicle industry. Just as we do in the semiconductor industry, where Japan has raw materials, equipment, and technology, and Taiwan has wafer manufacturing, our two countries can cooperate. Japan is a technological power, and Taiwan also has significant technological strengths. If Taiwan and Japan work together, we will not only be able to safeguard peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait and security in the Indo-Pacific region, but it will also be very helpful for the industrial development of both countries. Q: The drones you just described probably include examples from the Russo-Ukrainian War. Taiwan and China are separated by the Taiwan Strait. Do our drones need to have cross-sea flight capabilities? President Lai: Taiwan does not intend to counterattack the mainland, and does not intend to invade any country. Taiwan’s drones are meant to protect our own nation and territory. Q: Former President Biden previously stated that US forces would assist Taiwan’s defense in the event of an attack. President Trump, however, has yet to clearly state that the US would help defend Taiwan. Do you think that in such an event, the US would help defend Taiwan? Or is Taiwan now trying to persuade the US? President Lai: Former President Biden and President Trump have answered questions from reporters. Although their responses were different, strong cooperation with Taiwan under the Biden administration has continued under the Trump administration; there has been no change. During President Trump’s first term, cooperation with Taiwan was broader and deeper compared to former President Barack Obama’s terms. After former President Biden took office, cooperation with Taiwan increased compared to President Trump’s first term. Now, during President Trump’s second term, cooperation with Taiwan is even greater than under former President Biden. Taiwan-US cooperation continues to grow stronger, and has not changed just because President Trump and former President Biden gave different responses to reporters. Furthermore, the Trump administration publicly stated that in the future, the US will shift its strategic focus from Europe to the Indo-Pacific. The US secretary of defense even publicly stated that the primary mission of the US is to prevent China from invading Taiwan, maintain stability in the Indo-Pacific, and thus maintain world peace. There is a saying in Taiwan that goes, “Help comes most to those who help themselves.” Before asking friends and allies for assistance in facing threats from China, Taiwan must first be determined and prepared to defend itself. This is Taiwan’s principle, and we are working in this direction, making all the necessary preparations to safeguard the nation. Q: I would like to ask you a question about Taiwan-Japan relations. After the Great East Japan Earthquake in 2011, you made an appeal to give Japan a great deal of assistance and care. In particular, you visited Sendai to offer condolences. Later, you also expressed condolences and concern after the earthquakes in Aomori and Kumamoto. What are your expectations for future Taiwan-Japan exchanges and development? President Lai: I come from Tainan, and my constituency is in Tainan. Tainan has very deep ties with Japan, and of course, Taiwan also has deep ties with Japan. However, among Taiwan’s 22 counties and cities, Tainan has the deepest relationship with Japan. I sincerely hope that both of you and your teams will have an opportunity to visit Tainan. I will introduce Tainan’s scenery, including architecture from the era of Japanese rule, Tainan’s cuisine, and unique aspects of Tainan society, and you can also see lifestyles and culture from the Showa era.  The Wushantou Reservoir in Tainan was completed by engineer Mr. Hatta Yoichi from Kanazawa, Japan and the team he led to Tainan after he graduated from then-Tokyo Imperial University. It has nearly a century of history and is still in use today. This reservoir, along with the 16,000-km-long Chianan Canal, transformed the 150,000-hectare Chianan Plain into Taiwan’s premier rice-growing area. It was that foundation in agriculture that enabled Taiwan to develop industry and the technology sector of today. The reservoir continues to supply water to Tainan Science Park. It is used by residents of Tainan, the agricultural sector, and industry, and even the technology sector in Xinshi Industrial Park, as well as Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company. Because of this, the people of Tainan are deeply grateful for Mr. Hatta and very friendly toward the people of Japan. A major earthquake, the largest in 50 years, struck Tainan on February 6, 2016, resulting in significant casualties. As mayor of Tainan at the time, I was extremely grateful to then-Prime Minister Abe, who sent five Japanese officials to the disaster site in Tainan the day after the earthquake. They were very thoughtful and asked what kind of assistance we needed from the Japanese government. They offered to provide help based on what we needed. I was deeply moved, as former Prime Minister Abe showed such care, going beyond the formality of just sending supplies that we may or may not have actually needed. Instead, the officials asked what we needed and then provided assistance based on those needs, which really moved me. Similarly, when the Great East Japan Earthquake of 2011 or the later Kumamoto earthquakes struck, the people of Tainan, under my leadership, naturally and dutifully expressed their support. Even earlier, when central Taiwan was hit by a major earthquake in 1999, Japan was the first country to deploy a rescue team to the disaster area. On February 6, 2018, after a major earthquake in Hualien, former Prime Minister Abe appeared in a video holding up a message of encouragement he had written in calligraphy saying “Remain strong, Taiwan.” All of Taiwan was deeply moved. Over the years, Taiwan and Japan have supported each other when earthquakes struck, and have forged bonds that are family-like, not just neighborly. This is truly valuable. In the future, I hope Taiwan and Japan can be like brothers, and that the peoples of Taiwan and Japan can treat one another like family. If Taiwan has a problem, then Japan has a problem; if Japan has a problem, then Taiwan has a problem. By caring for and helping each other, we can face various challenges and difficulties, and pursue a brighter future. Q: President Lai, you just used the phrase “If Taiwan has a problem, then Japan has a problem.” In the event that China attempts to invade Taiwan by force, what kind of response measures would you hope the US military and Japan’s Self-Defense Forces take? President Lai: As I just mentioned, annexing Taiwan is only China’s first step. Its ultimate objective is to change the rules-based international order. That being the case, China’s threats are an international problem. So, I would very much hope to work together with the US, Japan, and others in the global democratic community to prevent China from starting a war – prevention, after all, is more important than cure.

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News –

    July 22, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Africa: Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) Hydrocarbons Ministry to Lead High-Level Delegation at United States (U.S.)-Africa Energy Forum (USAEF) 2025

    Source: APO

    The Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) is intensifying its focus on upstream development and strategic U.S. partnerships ahead of the U.S.-Africa Energy Forum (USAEF) 2025 (www.USAfricaEnergy.com) taking place on August 6-7 in Houston. Leading the effort is a senior delegation from the Ministry of Hydrocarbons, delivering a clear message: the DRC is open for investment, with exploration and downstream development as top priorities. 

    As part of its hydrocarbons roadmap, the DRC is seeking partners to bring capital, technology, and expertise into its exploration efforts, with a focus on high-potential onshore and offshore blocks. Many of these basins – including the Cuvette Centrale and Coastal regions – remain underexplored. While the DRC currently produces around 18,000 barrels per day (bpd), the Ministry of Hydrocarbons is targeting a major production scale-up to 300,000 bpd. This growth is expected to be driven by new offshore discoveries and a forthcoming petroleum code designed to clarify investor terms and enable joint development ventures. 

    The Ministry is also seeking to engage U.S.-based downstream and petrochemicals companies as part of a broader push to expand value-added processing and strengthen domestic energy infrastructure. USAEF 2025 offers a key platform for direct dialogue with U.S. investors, paving the way for new deals, technical partnerships and cross-regional energy trade. Current initiatives include the development of a new oil terminal in Goma to stabilize fuel supply in the east, along with upgrades to fuel storage and distribution networks nationwide. These projects create strong opportunities for U.S. engineering, technology and EPC firms to support infrastructure modernization, modular refining and local capacity-building. 

    Under efforts to foster new technical partnerships and attract capital investment, the Ministry will hold meetings at USAEF 2025 with upstream operators, seismic and drilling service providers, and petrochemical firms interested in entering or expanding in the Congolese market. The DRC is positioning itself as a strategic partner for American energy companies seeking access to a frontier market with significant geological potential, a reform-minded government and growing regional demand for refined products and petrochemicals. 

    For tickets, sponsorship opportunities and more information, please contact sales@energycapitalpower.com or visit www.USAfricaEnergy.com. Join us in Houston to connect with the leaders shaping Africa’s energy landscape and experience the momentum that drives ECP’s events worldwide. 

    Distributed by APO Group on behalf of Energy Capital & Power.

    Media files

    .

    MIL OSI Africa –

    July 22, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: ReconAfrica Provides a Corporate Operational Update

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    CALGARY, Alberta, July 22, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Reconnaissance Energy Africa Ltd. (the “Company” or “ReconAfrica”) (TSXV: RECO) (OTCQX: RECAF) (Frankfurt: 0XD) (NSX: REC) provides an operational update on the Kavango West 1X exploration prospect and announces the resignation of Iman Hill as a Corporate Director of the Company effective July 31, 2025.

    Kavango West 1X (Prospect I) – Spud scheduled before end of July

    The drilling rig has been safely moved on-site and all necessary permits required to spud the well have been received by the Company from the various regulators. Final drill-rig assembly and safety checks are underway and the Kavango West 1X exploration well is scheduled to spud before the end of July. The well is planned to reach total depth (TD) of approximately 3,800 metres (12,500 feet) and is expected to penetrate over 1,500 metres of Otavi carbonate reservoir section, which is the primary target of the Damara Fold Belt play.

    The Kavango West 1X exploration well will be the second test in the expansive Damara Fold Belt play. The prospect is a large structural fold identified on modern 2D seismic data, which extends over 22 kilometers long by three kilometers wide. The Company has identified over 19 prospects and leads mapped in the Damara Fold Belt trend, with an additional 5.0 million acres captured in a recently executed Memorandum of Understanding in offsetting Angola.

    Brian Reinsborough, President and CEO of ReconAfrica stated: “Everyone at the Company has worked diligently to get drill-ready on the Kavango West 1X prospect and we are excited to spud the well in the coming days. We recognize the importance of this play opening well holds for our shareholders, the local communities in which we operate and the broader energy industry in Namibia. We are committed to remaining engaged with local communities and authorities and to ensuring the safe and efficient operation of this well.”

    Board of Directors Update

    Iman Hill, who was appointed a Director of ReconAfrica in August 2023, has resigned from the Board of Directors effective July 31, 2025, due to foreign work obligations. Following Iman’s resignation, the Board of Directors will consist of five members, three of whom are independent directors. Currently, the Board of Directors intends to remain at five seats.

    Diana McQueen, Board Chair of ReconAfrica commented: “We thank Iman for her work and guidance over the past two years and wish her well in her future endeavors.

    With respect to the Kavango West 1X well, ReconAfrica wishes to thank all community and regulatory stakeholders in Namibia for working with the Company to bring the well to the current drill-ready stage. ReconAfrica remains engaged with its stakeholders and is focused on operations that are safe for all employees and neighbouring communities, as well as wildlife and the environment.”

    About ReconAfrica

    ReconAfrica is a Canadian oil and gas company engaged in the exploration of the Damara Fold Belt and Kavango Rift Basin in the Kalahari Desert of northeastern Namibia, southeastern Angola and northwestern Botswana, where the Company holds petroleum licences comprising ~13 million contiguous acres. In all aspects of its operations, ReconAfrica is committed to minimal disturbance of habitat in line with international standards and implementing environmental and social best practices in its project areas.

    Neither the TSXV nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in policies of the TSXV) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

    For further information contact:
    Brian Reinsborough, President and Chief Executive Officer
    Mark Friesen, Managing Director, Investor Relations & Capital Markets

    IR Inquiries Email: investors@reconafrica.com

    Media Inquiries Email: media@reconafrica.com

    Tel: +1-877-631-1160

    Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements:

    Certain statements contained in this press release constitute forward-looking information under applicable Canadian, United States and other applicable securities laws, rules and regulations, including, without limitation, statements with respect to the expected including timing of spud of the Kavango West 1X well, the well being drilled to a planned total depth of approximately 3,800 metres (12,500 feet), timing to reach total depth of the well and the Company’s commitment to minimal disturbance of habitat, in line with best international standards and its implementation of environmental and social best practices in its project areas. These statements relate to future events or future performance. The use of any of the words “could”, “intend”, “expect”, “believe”, “will”, “projected”, “estimated” and similar expressions and statements relating to matters that are not historical facts are intended to identify forward-looking information and are based on ReconAfrica’s current belief or assumptions as to the outcome and timing of such future events. There can be no assurance that such statements will prove to be accurate, as the Company’s actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of the factors discussed in the “Risk Factors” section in the Company’s annual information form (“AIF”) dated April 29, 2025 for the financial period ended December 31, 2024, available under the Company’s profile at www.sedarplus.ca. Actual future results may differ materially. Various assumptions or factors are typically applied in drawing conclusions or making the forecasts or projections set out in forward-looking information. Those assumptions and factors are based on information currently available to ReconAfrica. The forward-looking information contained in this release is made as of the date hereof and ReconAfrica undertakes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking information, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by applicable securities laws. Because of the risks, uncertainties and assumptions contained herein, investors should not place undue reliance on forward-looking information. The foregoing statements expressly qualify any forward-looking information contained herein.

    The MIL Network –

    July 22, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: Bispecific Antibodies Market Set to Surge to $163.15 Billion by 2032, Driven by a Robust 40.1% CAGR | Roche, Amgen, and Johnson & Johnson at the Forefront: AnalystView Market Insights

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    San Francisco, USA, July 22, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — The global bispecific antibodies market is witnessing a transformative surge, projected to grow at an impressive compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 40.10%, reaching a valuation of approximately USD 163,149.35 million by 2032. This extraordinary growth is propelled by the increasing adoption of bispecific antibody therapies in oncology and immunology, groundbreaking clinical outcomes, and robust R&D investments aimed at next-generation biologics.

    Bispecific antibodies are bioengineered molecules designed to simultaneously recognize and bind to two different antigens or epitopes. Unlike monoclonal antibodies that target a single antigen, bispecific antibodies can link a disease-related antigen (such as one found on cancer cells) to another molecule—often a T-cell—thus redirecting immune cells to attack malignant tissues with heightened precision. This dual-binding capability is unlocking new therapeutic possibilities in cancer, autoimmune diseases, and infectious diseases. As of 2024, over 300 bispecific antibodies are in global clinical development, with 14 already approved by the U.S. FDA, reflecting the sector’s rapid growth and clinical validation.

    Download Free Sample Report PDF @  https://www.analystviewmarketinsights.com/request_sample/AV4090 

    Global Bispecific Antibodies Market Key Players- Detailed Competitive Insights

    • Amgen
    • Genentech
    • Akeso, Inc.
    • Taisho Pharmaceutical
    • Janssen
    • Immunocore
    • Adimab, Innovent Biologics, Inc.
    • AstraZeneca
    • Affimed GmbH
    • Xencor
    • F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.
    • Sanofi
    • Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc.
    • Pieris Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
    • Eli Lilly
    • Mereo BioPharma Group plc
    • Merus
    • MacroGenics, Inc.
    • Sobi, TG Therapeutics Inc.
    • Genmab A/S
    • Alteogen
    • Emergent BioSolutions Inc.
    • Novartis AG
    • Astellas Pharma Inc.
    • Celgene Corporation
    • Others

    Market Drivers

    1. Increasing Cancer Prevalence Globally
    Cancer remains a global health crisis, with the World Health Organization (WHO) estimating around 19.3 million new cancer cases and nearly 10 million deaths in 2023 alone. Traditional therapies are often limited by poor specificity and severe side effects, which have shifted the focus toward more targeted modalities, such as bispecific antibodies. Their unique mechanism allows precise tumor targeting while preserving healthy tissues, making them a preferred choice for next-gen cancer therapies.

    2. Regulatory Approvals and Accelerated Development Pathways
    The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) have actively supported innovative antibody therapeutics. Between 2022 and 2024, the FDA approved six bispecific antibodies, a testament to their growing clinical value. Regulatory agencies are also introducing expedited pathways for breakthrough therapies, speeding up market entry for promising candidates.

    3. Rising Investments in Immunotherapy and Biologics
    Governments and private players are significantly boosting funding for immunotherapy research. For instance, the U.S. National Cancer Institute (NCI) allocated over USD 15 billion toward cancer research in 2023, a portion of which is directed toward the development of targeted therapies, including bispecific antibodies. This capital influx is catalyzing clinical trials, molecule discovery, and scalable manufacturing solutions.

    Market Challenges

    Despite the optimistic trajectory, the bispecific antibodies market faces notable challenges:

    • Complex Manufacturing: Producing bispecific antibodies involves intricate processes, such as protein folding and stability optimization, which increase production time and cost.
    • High Development Costs: The R&D cycle for bispecific therapies is long and resource-intensive, often requiring large-scale trials and advanced biotechnological platforms.
    • Immunogenicity Risks: Some bispecific formats can trigger unwanted immune responses, complicating their clinical profiles.

    Nonetheless, advances in antibody engineering, such as the development of Fc-engineered antibodies and T-cell engaging bispecifics (BiTEs), are helping overcome these limitations.

    Regional Insights

    North America is poised to maintain a dominant position in the global bispecific antibodies market. Its leadership is driven by:

    • A well-established biotech and pharma industry.
    • Substantial government and private R&D investments.
    • Early and streamlined regulatory approvals.

    In 2023 alone, the U.S. government dedicated nearly USD 7.9 billion toward cancer research, a portion of which supports novel antibody-based treatments. Moreover, the presence of major biopharmaceutical companies and academic research centers ensures rapid clinical development.

    Asia-Pacific, on the other hand, is anticipated to experience the fastest growth rate. Countries such as China, India, and South Korea are:

    • Increasing healthcare expenditures.
    • Encouraging local biotech innovation.
    • Expanding access to clinical trials and biologic therapies.

    China, for example, is investing heavily in biologics manufacturing capabilities and has introduced supportive regulations for fast-track drug approval, which will likely make the region a future hub for bispecific antibody development.

    TABLE OF CONTENT

    1. Bispecific Antibodies Market Overview
    1.1. Study Scope
    1.2. Market Estimation Years
    2. Executive Summary
    2.1. Market Snippet
    2.1.1. Bispecific Antibodies Market Snippet by Drug Type
    2.1.2. Bispecific Antibodies Market Snippet by Indication
    2.1.3. Bispecific Antibodies Market Snippet by Distribution Channel
    2.1.4. Bispecific Antibodies Market Snippet by Country
    2.1.5. Bispecific Antibodies Market Snippet by Region
    2.2. Competitive Insights
    3. Bispecific Antibodies Key Market Trends
    3.1. Bispecific Antibodies Market Drivers
    3.1.1. Impact Analysis of Market Drivers
    3.2. Bispecific Antibodies Market Restraints
    3.2.1. Impact Analysis of Market Restraints
    3.3. Bispecific Antibodies Market Opportunities
    3.4. Bispecific Antibodies Market Future Trends……

    Get a detailed analysis on regions, market segments, customer landscape, and companies@ https://www.analystviewmarketinsights.com/reports/report-highlight-bispecific-antibodies-market

    Market Segmentation by Indication

    The bispecific antibodies market is segmented by application into:

    • Cancer
    • Autoimmune and Inflammatory Disorders
    • Others

    Among these, the oncology segment is forecasted to command the largest share throughout the forecast period. As of March 2025, over 650 bispecific antibodies are in clinical development globally—nearly all focused on oncology applications, and nine of the 11 bispecifics approved since 2021 target cancer, representing over 80% of recent regulatory approvals.

    Competitive Landscape & Innovation Strategies

    The bispecific antibody space is rapidly evolving with heightened competition among biotech giants and emerging players. Leading companies are prioritizing:

    • Next-generation platforms for greater safety, flexibility, and efficacy.
    • Strategic collaborations and licensing deals to expand pipeline access.
    • Geographic expansion into emerging economies with rising healthcare demands.

    Biotech firms are utilizing AI-driven drug discovery, cell-line optimization, and novel bispecific formats (like dual-variable domain antibodies and knob-into-hole technologies) to advance their products. Some players are also entering into co-development agreements to reduce costs and accelerate regulatory milestones.

    Future Outlook

    The bispecific antibodies market is positioned at the forefront of immunotherapeutic innovation. With strong clinical potential, increasing funding, and a favorable regulatory climate, the sector is expected to witness substantial growth through 2032. As manufacturing bottlenecks are resolved and newer formats with improved safety emerge, bispecific antibodies will likely become standard components of combination therapies in oncology and immune-related disorders.

    In conclusion, the bispecific antibodies market offers immense opportunities for stakeholders across biotechnology, healthcare, and investment sectors. Its rapid evolution signals a paradigm shift in how complex diseases are treated, ushering in a new era of precision medicine.

    Browse more Reports from AnalystView Market Insights:

    Floating Production Storage and Offloading Market

    Wound Care Market

    Automotive Panoramic Roof Market

    Automotive Powerglide Shifters Market

    Industrial Edge Market

    The MIL Network –

    July 22, 2025
  • MIL-Evening Report: Gaza: Empty rhetoric from New Zealand and other Western countries

    In a joint statement, more than two dozen Western countries, including New Zealand, have called for an immediate end to the war on Gaza. But the statement is merely empty rhetoric that declines to take any concrete action against Israel, and which Israel will duly ignore. 

    AGAINST THE CURRENT: By Steven Cowan

    The New Zealand government has joined 27 other countries calling for an “immediate end” to the war in Gaza. The joint statement says  “the suffering of civilians in Gaza has reached new depths”.

    It goes on to say that the drip feeding of aid and the inhumane killing of civilians, including children, seeking to meet their most basic needs of water and food.

    But many of the countries that have signed this statement stand condemned for actively enabling Israel to pursue its genocidal assault on Gaza. Countries like Britain, Canada and Australia, continue to supply Israel with arms, have continued to trade with Israel, and have turned a blind eye to the atrocities and war crimes Israel continues to commit in Gaza.

    It’s more than ironic that while Western countries like Britain and New Zealand are calling for an end to the war in Gaza, they continue to be hostile toward the anti-war protest movements in their own countries.

    The British government recently classified the protest group Palestine Action as a “terrorist” group.

    In New Zealand, the Minister of Foreign Affairs, Winston Peters, has denounced pro-Palestine protesters as “left wing fascists” and “communist, fascist and anti-democratic losers”. He has pushed back against the growing demands that the New Zealand government take direct action against Israel, including the cutting of all diplomatic ties.

    The New Zealand government, which contains a number of Zionists within its cabinet, including Act leader David Seymour and co-leader Brooke van Velden, will be more than comfortable with a statement that proposes to do nothing.

    ‘Statement lacks leadership’
    Its call for an end to the war is empty rhetoric, and which Israel will duly ignore — as it has ignored other calls for its genocidal war to end.  As Amnesty International has said, ‘the statement lacks any resolve, leadership, or action to help end the genocide in Gaza.’

    “This is cruelty – this is not a war,” says this young girl’s placard quoting the late Pope Francis in an Auckland march last Saturday . . . this featured in an earlier report. Image: Asia Pacific Report

    New Zealand has declined to join The Hague Group alliance of countries that recently met in Colombia.

    It announced six immediate steps it would be taking against Israel. But since The Hague Group has already been attacked by the United States, it’s never been likely that New Zealand would join it.

    The National-led coalition government has surrendered New Zealand’s independent foreign policy in favour of supporting the interests of a declining American Empire.

    Republished from Steven Cowan’s blog Against The Current with permission.

    MIL OSI Analysis – EveningReport.nz –

    July 22, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: ICG Enterprise Trust announces realisation of Datasite

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    22 July 2025

    ICG Enterprise Trust announces realisation of Datasite, its fourth largest portfolio company

    ICG Enterprise Trust plc (“ICGT”) is pleased to announce that it has fully realised its co-investment1 in Datasite, a provider of software focused on virtual data rooms. At 31 January 2025, Datasite was ICGT’s fourth largest company exposure, accounting for 1.9% of the Portfolio value. The co-investment portion accounted for 1.6% of the Portfolio value.

    As a result of the sale ICGT has received cash proceeds of $30 million (£22 million), representing a 3% premium to the valuation at Q1 FY26.

    ICGT made an $18 million co-investment (£14 million) in Datasite alongside ICG Strategic Equity V and CapVest in 2024. The transaction has generated an attractive return, particularly given the short hold period2.

    1Following this transaction, ICGT will retain a small stake in Datasite through its commitment to ICG Strategic Equity V. At 31 January 2025 this indirect exposure represented 0.3% of the Portfolio value.

    2Does not necessarily reflect the expected future performance and should not be used to compare returns among multiple private equity funds.

    Enquiries

    Analyst / Investor enquiries:  
    Martin Li, Shareholder Relations, ICG +44 (0) 20 3545 1816
    Nathan Brown, Deutsche Numis +44 (0) 20 7260 1426
    David Harris, Cadarn Capital +44 (0) 20 7019 9042
       
    Media:  
    Clare Glynn, Corporate Communications, ICG +44 (0) 20 3545 1395
       
    Website:  
    www.icg-enterprise.co.uk  

    About ICG Enterprise Trust

    ICG Enterprise Trust is a leading listed private equity investor focused on creating long-term compounding growth by delivering consistently strong returns through selectively investing in profitable, cash-generative private companies, primarily in Europe and the US.

    We invest in companies directly as well as through funds managed by ICG and other leading managers who focus on creating long-term value and building sustainable growth through active management and strategic change.

    We have a long track record of delivering strong returns through a flexible mandate and highly selective approach that strikes the right balance between concentration and diversification, risk and reward.

    Disclaimer

    This report may contain forward looking statements. These written materials are not an offer of securities for sale in the United States. Securities may not be offered or sold in the United States absent registration under the US Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or an exemption therefrom. The issuer has not and does not intend to register any securities under the US Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and does not intend to offer any securities to the public in the United States. No money, securities or other consideration from any person inside the United States is being solicited and, if sent in response to the information contained in these written materials, will not be accepted.

    The MIL Network –

    July 22, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: ICG Enterprise Trust announces realisation of Datasite

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    22 July 2025

    ICG Enterprise Trust announces realisation of Datasite, its fourth largest portfolio company

    ICG Enterprise Trust plc (“ICGT”) is pleased to announce that it has fully realised its co-investment1 in Datasite, a provider of software focused on virtual data rooms. At 31 January 2025, Datasite was ICGT’s fourth largest company exposure, accounting for 1.9% of the Portfolio value. The co-investment portion accounted for 1.6% of the Portfolio value.

    As a result of the sale ICGT has received cash proceeds of $30 million (£22 million), representing a 3% premium to the valuation at Q1 FY26.

    ICGT made an $18 million co-investment (£14 million) in Datasite alongside ICG Strategic Equity V and CapVest in 2024. The transaction has generated an attractive return, particularly given the short hold period2.

    1Following this transaction, ICGT will retain a small stake in Datasite through its commitment to ICG Strategic Equity V. At 31 January 2025 this indirect exposure represented 0.3% of the Portfolio value.

    2Does not necessarily reflect the expected future performance and should not be used to compare returns among multiple private equity funds.

    Enquiries

    Analyst / Investor enquiries:  
    Martin Li, Shareholder Relations, ICG +44 (0) 20 3545 1816
    Nathan Brown, Deutsche Numis +44 (0) 20 7260 1426
    David Harris, Cadarn Capital +44 (0) 20 7019 9042
       
    Media:  
    Clare Glynn, Corporate Communications, ICG +44 (0) 20 3545 1395
       
    Website:  
    www.icg-enterprise.co.uk  

    About ICG Enterprise Trust

    ICG Enterprise Trust is a leading listed private equity investor focused on creating long-term compounding growth by delivering consistently strong returns through selectively investing in profitable, cash-generative private companies, primarily in Europe and the US.

    We invest in companies directly as well as through funds managed by ICG and other leading managers who focus on creating long-term value and building sustainable growth through active management and strategic change.

    We have a long track record of delivering strong returns through a flexible mandate and highly selective approach that strikes the right balance between concentration and diversification, risk and reward.

    Disclaimer

    This report may contain forward looking statements. These written materials are not an offer of securities for sale in the United States. Securities may not be offered or sold in the United States absent registration under the US Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or an exemption therefrom. The issuer has not and does not intend to register any securities under the US Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and does not intend to offer any securities to the public in the United States. No money, securities or other consideration from any person inside the United States is being solicited and, if sent in response to the information contained in these written materials, will not be accepted.

    The MIL Network –

    July 22, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Cortez Masto, Bipartisan Delegation Meet with Canadian Prime Minister, Discuss Critical U.S.-Canada Trade Partnership  

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Nevada Cortez Masto

    On a bipartisan trip to Ottawa, Senator Cortez Masto highlighted the harm President Trump’s trade war with Canada is having on Nevada’s travel and tourism economy

    Washington, D.C. – Today, U.S. Senator Catherine Cortez Masto (D-Nev.) returned from a bipartisan trip to Canada with Senators Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), and Maggie Hassan (D-N.H.). While there, they met with Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney to support the resolution of unnecessary trade conflicts between the United States and Canada, which are raising costs for American families and hurting Nevada’s travel and tourism industries.

    “Canada is one of America’s closest trade partners and allies, and in Nevada, we have a special connection with our neighbors to the north,” said Senator Cortez Masto. “Every year, well over a million Canadians visit the Silver State. Despite the chaos of the Trump presidency, I will continue to fight to ensure American workers are treated fairly, while strengthening our ties with Canada to bolster our tourism economy and promote American national security. We can do both.”

    In 2024, Canada was Nevada’s most important foreign market for travel, and 1.49 million Canadian visitors traveled to the state, primarily to Las Vegas. Since President Trump took office, however, the relationship between the United States and Canada has declined, threatening this vital travel and tourism relationship. The airlines with direct flights from Canada to Las Vegas have shown significant passenger declines this year, including a decrease of 64 percent for Flair, 34.6 percent for WestJet, and 22 percent for Air Canada. Overall, visitation from Canada to Las Vegas is down 14.5 percent this year.  

    The Senators also met with Foreign Minister Anita Anand, Finance Minister François-Philippe Champagne, Minister of Industry Melanie Joly and Canada-U.S. Trade Minister Dominic LeBlanc. The members raised a number of trade, tourism and economic issues, the importance of partnering on national security and cybersecurity, and on working together to combat fentanyl trafficking. 

    Senator Cortez Masto has continued to push the Trump Administration to address the impacts of Trump’s tariffs on working families and Nevada small businesses. During a Senate Finance Committee hearing, Cortez Masto pressed U.S. Trade Representative Greer about the impacts of President Trump’s blanket tariffs on Nevadans, particularly those employed in the tourism and hospitality industry. The Senator introduced the Tariff Transparency Act to require the U.S. International Trade Commission to publicly investigate how Donald Trump’s proposed tariffs on imports from Mexico and Canada would impact the American people.

    MIL OSI USA News –

    July 22, 2025
  • South Korea finance minister, trade envoy to hold tariff talks with US counterparts

    Source: Government of India

    Source: Government of India (4)

    South Korea’s new finance minister and the country’s top trade envoy will meet in Washington with U.S. counterparts on Friday for talks on U.S. tariffs, Finance Minister Koo Yun-cheol said on Tuesday.

    The country’s foreign and industry ministers will also visit the U.S. for trade discussions as early as this week, Koo told reporters after a meeting of economic ministers.

    Koo took office on Monday.

    The four officials complete a new cabinet team under President Lee Jae Myung who was sworn in on June 4 after winning a snap election called after his predecessor’s ouster for trying to declare martial law.

    The political turmoil that ensued delayed South Korea’s response to U.S. President Donald Trump’s punishing tariff regime imposed on dozens of trade partners, including key industrial powerhouses that are also security allies.

    Koo and Minister for Trade Yeo Han-koo will hold talks with U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer on Friday at the request of the U.S. officials, the finance minister said.

    “We’ve had discussions from the perspective of national interest and pragmatism and we’ll do our best to prepare a meticulous strategy until we’re leaving,” Koo said, declining to say whether Seoul was hoping to push back the August 1 deadline before reciprocal tariffs set by Trump are due to come in.

    Yeo said on Tuesday he would seek to base the talks around forming a manufacturing partnership with the United States.

    On Monday, South Korea’s new Industry Minister Kim Jung-kwan said tariff talks were in a critical phase that could result in a range of possible outcomes and pledged an all-out effort to wrap up negotiations by August 1.

    Trump has vowed to slap tariffs on a range of countries including South Korea to reduce what he called unfair trade imbalances.

    On Saturday, Japan’s top tariff negotiator, Ryosei Akazawa, said he planned to visit Washington this week to hold further ministerial-level talks, as Tokyo hopes to clinch a deal by its August 1 deadline.

    (Reuters)

    July 22, 2025
  • Trump releases Martin Luther King assassination files

    Source: Government of India

    Source: Government of India (4)

    The U.S. Justice Department on Monday released more than 240,000 pages of documents related to the assassination of Martin Luther King Jr., including records from the FBI, which had surveilled the civil rights leader as part of an effort to discredit the Nobel Peace Prize winner and his civil rights movement.

    Files were posted on the website of the National Archives, which said more would be released.

    King died of an assassin’s bullet in Memphis, Tennessee, on April 4, 1968, as he increasingly extended his attention from a nonviolent campaign for equal rights for African Americans to economic issues and calls for peace. His death shook the United States in a year that would also bring race riots, anti-Vietnam war demonstrations and the assassination of presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy.

    Earlier this year, President Donald Trump’s administration released thousands of pages of digital documents related to the assassinations of Robert Kennedy and former President John F. Kennedy, who was killed in 1963.

    Trump promised on the campaign trail to provide more transparency about Kennedy’s death. Upon taking office, he also ordered aides to present a plan for the release of records relating to the assassinations of Robert Kennedy and King.

    The FBI kept files on King in the 1950s and 1960s – even wiretapping his phones – because of what the bureau falsely said at the time were his suspected ties to communism during the Cold War between the U.S. and Soviet Union. In recent years, the FBI has acknowledged that as an example of “abuse and overreach” in its history.

    The civil rights leader’s family asked those who engage with the files to “do so with empathy, restraint, and respect for our family’s continuing grief,” and condemned “any attempts to misuse these documents.”

    “Now more than ever, we must honor his sacrifice by committing ourselves to the realization of his dream – a society rooted in compassion, unity, and equality,” they said in a statement.

    “During our father’s lifetime, he was relentlessly targeted by an invasive, predatory, and deeply disturbing disinformation and surveillance campaign orchestrated by J. Edgar Hoover through the Federal Bureau of Investigation,” the family, including his two living children, Martin III, 67, and Bernice, 62, said, referring to the then-FBI director.

    James Earl Ray, a segregationist and drifter, confessed to killing King but later recanted. He died in prison in 1998.

    King’s family said it had filed a wrongful death civil lawsuit in Tennessee in 1999 that led to a jury unanimously concluding “that our father was the victim of a conspiracy involving Loyd Jowers and unnamed co-conspirators, including government agencies as a part of a wider scheme. The verdict also affirmed that someone other than James Earl Ray was the shooter, and that Mr. Ray was set up to take the blame. Our family views that verdict as an affirmation of our long-held beliefs.”

    Jowers, once a Memphis police officer, told ABC’s Prime Time Live in 1993 that he participated in a plot to kill King. A 2023 Justice Department report called his claims dubious.

    (Reuters)

    July 22, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: DOD Raises Ceiling of Contract with General Dynamics for Vital Work in Grand Forks

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator Kevin Cramer (R-ND)

    WASHINGTON, D.C. – The U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) announced it has increased the size of its contract with General Dynamics, a global aerospace and defense company, by $34,273,921 to reflect growing numbers of test activities and missile track fusion work performed at Grand Forks and other sites for the Space Development Agency (SDA). This announcement brings the total cumulative value of the contract, which is expected to be completed by Sep. 30, 2029, to $1,106,722,296.

    As chair of the Senate Armed Services (SASC) Airland Subcommittee, U.S. Senator Kevin Cramer (R-ND) leads the effort to advance space-based capabilities and missions, both in North Dakota and across the nation.

    “With the 319th Reconnaissance Wing flying RQ-4 Global Hawks and providing vital warfighting and ground-based capabilities, the innovative defense ecosystem at Grand Forks Air Force Base is unmatched,” said Cramer. “Raising the contract ceiling will allow General Dynamics to better support our Proliferated Warfighter Space Architecture ground management, integration, operation, and sustainment efforts. This crucial investment is proof of the global expertise that resides right here in Grand Forks.”

    In April, General Michael Guetlein, the DOD’s Golden Dome leader, joined Cramer and SDA Director Derek Tournear in touring North Dakota’s defense capabilities. The group saw recent updates at SDA Operations Center North and visited Cavalier Space Force Station. During the visit, the group viewed on-going U.S. Space Force activities throughout the state.

    Last year, Cramer flipped the switch to bring the SDA Operations Center North online at Grand Forks Air Force Base (GFAFB), participated in a Grand Forks Base Retention Committee meeting, toured the University of North Dakota (UND) National Security Corridor, and announced new Navy personnel at GFAFB. Cramer also joined E-Space CEO Greg Wyler in meeting with UND faculty and SDA staff to discuss workforce development and initiatives, and announced educational initiatives between SDA and UND.

    MIL OSI USA News –

    July 22, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Cornyn Throws Down the Gauntlet on Outbound Investment to Counter China

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Texas John Cornyn

    WASHINGTON – Today on the floor, U.S. Senator John Cornyn (R-TX) highlighted his priorities for the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), including his Foreign Investment Guardrails to Help Thwart (FIGHT) China Act, which would safeguard the United States against the growing threat posed by the People’s Republic of China (PRC) by prohibiting and requiring notification of U.S. investment in certain technologies in China. Excerpts of Sen. Cornyn’s remarks are below, and video can be found here.

    “One of the things that I’m going to be focusing on as part of the defense authorization bill is to finally address outbound investment in China.”

    “As we speak, U.S. companies are spending billions of dollars in China, investing in Chinese companies, particularly those involved in critical technologies like quantum computing and Artificial Intelligence.”

    “I’ve been raising alarm bells for a number of years now and working toward a solution to this critical, strategic concern for a long time.”

    “I have something to announce to my colleagues here: I’m not going to give up.”

    “I’m not willing to take no for an answer on something that is so critical to our national security.”

    “What good does it do to continue to increase our defense spending if American investors are simultaneously making investments in China in what amounts to the arsenal of our number-one strategic adversary?”

    “Earlier this year, I introduced the Foreign Investment Guardrails to Help Thwart China Act, or the FIGHT China Act.”

    “Secretary Bessent and his colleagues at the Treasury Department have been great allies and great partners in providing us with technical assistance on this legislation.”

    “I would urge both our House and Senate colleagues to ensure that this year’s National Defense Authorization Bill addresses this critical issue.”

    “It’s time for Americans to stop investing in China’s military.”

    MIL OSI USA News –

    July 22, 2025
  • MIL-OSI China: Unitree begins preparation for mainland float

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    Humanoid robots from Chinese company Unitree Robotics are seen at the backstage of China Central Television (CCTV) Spring Festival Gala in Beijing, capital of China, Jan. 28, 2025. [Photo/Xinhua]

    Unitree Robotics, a Chinese manufacturer of humanoid robots, has begun preparations for an initial public offering, joining a wave of domestic embodied AI companies in tapping the capital market as they race to become globally leading robotics firms.

    While Unitree has yet to disclose its intended market for a flotation, several sources told China Daily that China’s STAR Market on the Shanghai Stock Exchange is the likeliest destination.

    According to a filing posted on the website of the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the company is under the listing guidance of CITIC Securities. The company could file its IPO as early as October.

    Founded by Wang Xingxing, Unitree focuses on the high-performance humanoid and quadruped robots. Wang controls roughly 34.8 percent of the firm through direct and indirect holdings.

    The Hangzhou, Zhejiang province-based startup’s G1 humanoid robot surprised viewers in January when 16 such robots performed a dance routine on China’s Spring Festival Gala, which was viewed 16.8 billion times.

    Wang has said previously that the company’s annual revenue has surpassed 1 billion yuan ($137 million) and that it has been making a profit since 2020, which industry experts said is a rare feat in the capital-intensive robotics field.

    Compared with counterparts in the United States, Chinese robotics makers are mass-producing humanoid robots for consumers at cheaper prices.

    Unitree’s G1 is priced at 99,000 yuan ($13,600). After the company became widely known, the humanoid robot has been frequently spotted at meetings, in restaurants, and in various galas as well as activities.

    In addition to the humanoid robots, Unitree also offers the Go2 robotic dog, starting at 9,997 yuan, along with various accessories. The Go2 series has been well-received for its versatility and affordability, making it a popular choice among tech enthusiasts.

    Unitree’s IPO push comes amid a red-hot summer of fundraising across China’s embodied AI sector, a field combining robotics and artificial intelligence to enable machines with physical agency in the real world.

    Earlier this month, humanoid robot startup AgiBot made headlines with a bold move to gain control of a material company via equity transfer and tender offer, which was seen by many industry insiders as a back-door listing play aimed at fast-tracking onto the STAR Market.

    Meanwhile, early-stage fundraising has surged.

    In July alone, several players in the embodied AI sector disclosed fresh financing rounds, drawing heavyweight backers including Tencent Holdings, Alibaba Group, and Geely.

    According to data from tech-focused ITjuzi.com, China’s embodied AI industry saw 133 investment events totaling over 18 billion yuan as of last week, already surpassing the full-year 2023 figures by both volume as well as value.

    Rick Xiong, general manager of the Beijing Embodied Artificial Intelligence Robotics Innovation Center, said: “These combined efforts will shape the future in our favor. Chinese robot companies have the right timing, the right place and the right people to accelerate the humanoid robot push.”

    Xiong said that leading Western countries have witnessed deep-pocketed industry giants dominating the robot landscape, whereas China has been characterized by a proliferation of small to medium-sized enterprises striving to navigate the competitive terrain of humanoid robots.

    He also said that the rise of artificial intelligence large language models, exemplified by technologies like ChatGPT, has been a game-changer in the robotics industry.

    While investor enthusiasm remains high, industry insiders said the real challenge lies in large-scale commercialization. Analysts see a growing divide between players chasing hype and those delivering viable applications.

    Wang from Unitree recently predicted that humanoid robots would be widely used in industries and services within three to five years, with early adoption in hazardous or repetitive environments.

    Wang Feili, a machinery analyst at UBS Securities, echoed that view, saying humanoid robots will likely first land in factories and service settings before entering households. “Industrial scenarios are less complex and more tolerant of cost, whereas consumers expect versatile capabilities — the bar is much higher at home,” she said.

    MIL OSI China News –

    July 22, 2025
←Previous Page
1 … 78 79 80 81 82 … 714
Next Page→
NewzIntel.com

NewzIntel.com

MIL Open Source Intelligence

  • Blog
  • About
  • FAQs
  • Authors
  • Events
  • Shop
  • Patterns
  • Themes

Twenty Twenty-Five

Designed with WordPress