Category: NGOs

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: Lebanon: Pager attacks ‘bear the hallmarks of a sinister dystopian nightmare’ – witness testimonies

    Source: Amnesty International –

    Pager and walkie-talkie attacks are war crimes

    ‘He took the pager in his hands, I was looking at it, and it said ERROR …. then the pager exploded’ Witness

    ‘Detonating thousands of devices simultaneously without being able to determine their exact location or whose possession they were in at the time of the attack demonstrates a flagrant disregard for the right to life’ – Aya Majzoub

    An international investigation must be established to hold to account the perpetrators of the devastating explosions that blew up pagers and walkie-talkies injuring more than 2,931 people in Lebanon and Syria and killing at least 37, including at least four civilians said Amnesty International ahead of a UN Security Council meeting being held today to discuss the attacks.

    The attacks were carried out indiscriminately. Evidence indicates that those who planned and carried out these attacks could not verify who would be harmed when the devices exploded, or even if only fighters had been given them and is unlawful under international humanitarian law and should be investigated as war crimes.

    Explosions took place in supermarkets, cars, residential streets and other busy public areas causing traumatic injuries, spreading widespread terror and panic across Lebanon and overwhelming a healthcare sector already impacted by an acute economic crisis.

    Aya Majzoub, Amnesty International’s Deputy Director for the Middle East and North Africa, said:

    “The mass explosions across Lebanon and Syria in recent days bear the hallmarks of a sinister dystopian nightmare.

    “Using hidden explosive devices concealed within everyday telecommunications devices to wage deadly attacks on such a scale is unprecedented.

    “Even if the attacks intended to target military objectives, detonating thousands of devices simultaneously without being able to determine their exact location or whose possession they were in at the time of the attack demonstrates a flagrant disregard for the right to life and for the laws of armed conflict.

    “International humanitarian law prohibits indiscriminate attacks. It also prohibits the use of the type of booby-traps that appear to have been used in these attacks.

    “The UN Security Council should take all the measures at its disposal to ensure protection of civilians and avoid more needless suffering. An international investigation must urgently be set up to establish the facts and bring the perpetrators to justice.”

    Eyewitness testimony

    Amnesty spoke to eight witnesses, the Lebanese Minister of Health, two medical doctors, two psychologists and a security source. The organisation’s Crisis Evidence Lab analysed 19 photos and videos from the explosions and their aftermath.

    On 17 September between 3:30pm and 4:30pm, hidden explosive devices within thousands of pagers across Lebanon exploded, killing at least 12 people, including a nine-year-old girl, an 11-year-old boy and two medics, and injuring at least 2,323 people. The next day, just before 5pm similar explosive devices within scores of hand-held “walkie-talkies” exploded across Lebanon, killing at least 25 people and injuring at least 608.

    A resident of the southern city of Sour (Tyre) told Amnesty she saw people running as blood flowed in the street; a man told her that pagers were exploding: “It was a state of panic in every sense of the word. I still cannot comprehend it. It’s as if we are watching an episode of ‘Black Mirror’ (a dystopian TV series) – these things aren’t supposed to happen.”

    Another witness who was shopping in the southern Beirut suburb of Borj al-Barajne when she saw women and children screaming and running, described the scenes as apocalyptic. “People were running all around me, but my legs couldn’t move,” she said. She later saw young men lying on the ground and dozens of ambulances arriving.

    Amnesty’s Evidence Lab analysed 12 videos showing the pagers exploding in crowded civilian areas, including in residential streets and grocery stores, as well as in people’s homes. A verified video of the skyline of Beirut shows large plums of smoke over at least 10 sites in residential areas.

    Dr Firas Abiad, Lebanon’s Minister of Health, described the attacks as “the epitome of indiscriminate attacks” adding many caused “life-changing injuries”.

    One witness confirmed to Amnesty media reports that stated the pagers beeped before detonating which caused some people to hold them up to their faces to check the screens. A mechanic in Sour described how a friend’s pager started beeping:

    “He took it in his hands, I was looking at it, and it said ERROR. I turned around to get my cigarettes, and I was still right next to him, and then the pager exploded. He lost his hand and both his eyes.”

    Evidence available to Amnesty indicates the pagers were not only distributed to Hezbollah fighters but were also likely to have been distributed to employees of Hezbollah institutions that work in civilian capacities.

    Dr Abiad told Amnesty that at least four healthcare workers suffered serious injuries in the attacks including one who died from their wounds.

    Amnesty also spoke to the employee of a non-profit organisation who said that two staff members responsible for organising community outreach programmes in the southern suburbs of Beirut and in the south, owned these pagers and were injured when they exploded. 

    Dr Georges Ghanem, Chief Medical Officer of the Lebanese American University Medical Center, said the hospital was flooded with injured patients requiring the same expertise:

    “Everybody had injuries to their hands, lots of amputations, and eye problems that [cannot be fixed]…One of those who died was an 11-year-old boy. He had major brain injuries. He was with his father, who had the pager.”

    Dr Salah Zeineddine, the Chief Medical Officer of the American University of Beirut Medical Center, also said all of the patients admitted had sustained multiple injuries including to the face, hands, lower abdomen and waist.

    An ophthalmologist at Mount Lebanon University Hospital in Beirut told the media that 60%-70% of the patients he treated had to have at least one eye removed.

    “[For] some of the patients, we had to remove both eyes. It kills me. In my past 25 years of practice, I’ve never removed as many eyes as I did yesterday [17 September],” he said.

    Amnesty’s Crisis Evidence Lab analysed images of the destroyed pagers, and said they were consistent with AR-924 Gold Apollo Rugged pagers. A security source told Amnesty that Hezbollah had ordered around 5,000 of these pagers earlier this year.

    It is likely that the attack was carried out using a small remotely controlled explosive device hidden in a modified batch of pagers. The blasts in the videos are consistent with the detonation of the small amount of explosives that could be contained within such small electronic devices.

    Walkie-talkies explode

    On 18 September just before 5pm, more electronic devices simultaneously detonated across the country, with reports of explosions in the southern suburbs of Beirut, cities and towns in southern Lebanon, and in the Bekaa.

    Video verified by Amnesty’s Evidence Lab show large smoke plumes, indicating that the explosions resulting from those devices were bigger than those caused by the pagers setting entire residential apartments and shops on fire. The Lebanese Communications Ministry said the devices that exploded are IC-V82 handheld radios, or walkie-talkies, made by a Japanese firm, but that the model had been discontinued and the devices were not officially licensed. Images of the exploded devices reviewed by the Evidence Lab were consistent with IC-V82 walkie-talkies. A security source told Reuters that these handheld radios were purchased by Hezbollah five months ago, around the same time as the pagers.

    At least two explosions were heard as hundreds of people of all ages gathered for the funeral of four people – including a child and a medic – killed in the pager detonations the day before. Amnesty spoke to three witnesses there who described people running and screaming, one said that someone in the crowd was yelling:

    “it exploded in his hand!”

    The Lebanese Civil Defense said its personnel worked to extinguish fires that broke out in 60 homes and shops, 15 cars and dozens of motorcycles following the walkie-talkie explosions.

    Traumatised by fear

    These attacks have compounded the fear and trauma of a Lebanese population already facing the threat of an escalation of war with Israel.

    Joseph el-Khoury, a consultant psychiatrist, said the attacks could have a long-lasting impact:

    “These attacks terrorised the city…and are a continuation of the [Israeli jet] flyovers and sonic booms… Whoever did that did not care about the mental health of an entire population.”

    One resident told Amnesty:

    “I left my phone at home, I didn’t open a laptop, I became paranoid. Anything that connects me to the Internet, I don’t want to touch. I also don’t want a motorcycle to pass by me, I don’t want people next to me. Because if they have a device, I am gone with them.”

    Israel’s reaction

    Although the Israeli government has not officially commented on the attacks, on 18 September, Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant declared that a “new era” of war with Lebanon is beginning and praised the “excellent achievements” of the Israeli security and intelligence, a statement which has been interpreted as an implicit acknowledgement of Israel’s role in the attacks.

    The Lebanese authorities and US officials have also indicated they believe Israel orchestrated the attacks.

    Amnesty has written to the Israeli Prime Minister’s Office and Ministry of Foreign Affairs requesting their responses to the allegations that Israel was responsible for the attacks.

    International law

    If Israel is found to be responsible, then these attacks took place in the context of an ongoing armed conflict and, as a result, their lawfulness must be assessed on the basis of international humanitarian law, as well as applicable international human rights law, which continues to apply in situations of armed conflict. This applies in particular to the right to life, as confirmed by the UN Human Rights Committee.

    The reliance on routine tools of civilian daily life for the explosions, the impossibility of the perpetrators being able to know the identity of all those who received the devices, who would be using them and who would be near them – all of these factors indicate that the attacks were indiscriminate and therefore unlawful and should be investigated as war crimes.

    International humanitarian law also prohibits the use of booby-traps or other devices which employ a device “in the form of apparently harmless portable objects which are specifically designed and constructed to contain explosive material”.

    Catalogue of carnage

    As of 9 September, Israeli attacks on south Lebanon and the Bekaa have killed at least 137 civilians, according to the Lebanese Ministry of Health and the United Nations. Over 113,000 people have been displaced from south Lebanon due to the ongoing hostilities. According to the Israeli authorities, Hezbollah and other armed groups have fired projectiles at northern Israel and killed 14 civilians. Twelve children were killed on 27 July in an attack on Majdal Shams in the occupied Golan Heights, Israel blamed Hezbollah, but Hezbollah has denied responsibility. Around 60,000 residents of northern Israel have been evacuated since 8 October 2023 – attacks which do not distinguish between civilians and military targets are indiscriminate. When such attacks kill or injure civilians they constitute war crimes.

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: Defending the right to abortion shouldn’t be a dangerous job

    Source: Amnesty International –

    Fernanda Doz Costa, Director of Gender, Racial Justice, Refugees and Migrants Rights Program at Amnesty International.

    Hate emails, stigmatization, death threats, stalking, burglaries, attacks, harassment at work and at home. Killings. This is what life is like for many who provide life-saving reproductive care, including abortions.

    Facilitating safe access to abortions has become an increasingly dangerous undertaking in most corners of the world, despite huge progress to expand access to healthcare.

    From the United States to Ethiopia, Colombia and Poland, those who defend the right to abortion, including health professionals such as midwives, nurses and doctors, have been facing a relentless backlash.

    In the USA, the National Abortion Federation recorded 11 murders, 26 attempted murders and 531 cases of assault, among many other types of attacks against people who facilitated abortions between 1977 and 2022. Since a devastating Supreme Court ruling two years ago greatly limited access to abortion services and created an environment of fear, there has been an increase in incidents like arsons, burglaries and death threats.

    From the United States to Ethiopia, Colombia and Poland, those who defend the right to abortion, including health professionals such as midwives, nurses and doctors, have been facing a relentless backlash.

    Fernanda Doz Costa, Director of Gender, Racial Justice, Refugees and Migrants Rights Program, Amnesty International

    In Sudan, abortion providers routinely face physical violence and public shaming.

    “A provider was shot by the spouse of a woman who sought an abortion,” one gynecologist recently told us. “There have been a few instances where service providers have been beaten by members of the public, even when just educating about contraception, or intervening in child marriage cases, especially in rural communities. So, providers are scared.”

    In other countries, such as Italy, anti-abortion activists organize online harassment campaigns against health professionals, which can have a deep impact offline. Attacks include barrages of insults, threats and trolling, and their profiles being reported to social media companies, in an attempt to get them banned from social media platforms.

    Another form of intimidation that is common across the world are aggressive anti-abortion protests and pickets outside health clinics, a strategy to terrorize both people seeking medical care, particularly those relying on public services, and the professionals trying to provide it.

    Not all is bad news. Over the last few decades, there has been a tremendous positive global trend towards advancing abortion rights around the world — in the past 30 years alone, more than 60 countries have liberalized their abortion laws. But, partly as a response to this, anti-rights initiatives continue to impede millions of people from accessing essential and vital health care. This happens even in countries where abortion services are legal on paper but challenging to access in practice.  

    Individuals and organizations advocating for limits to basic human rights have promoted an agenda that violently targets and stigmatizes anyone working to protect those in need of medical attention.

    As a gynecologist from Nigeria told us: “I face harassment and stigmatization for the work I do. The stigma is among fellow professional colleagues who make remarks that are demeaning to me. On the basis of religion, they preach to me about the sins committed for supporting abortion care, the killing of ‘the unborn children’ and the ‘hellfire that awaits all murderers.’”

    Similarly, Dr. Laura Gil, a doctor from Colombia, described the harassment and violence her and other colleagues who perform abortions face, even from colleagues: “They slashed one of my friend’s car tires. They glued shut a different colleague’s padlock so she couldn’t open her locker. When another friend who is a psychiatrist stood up for a patient who was asking to terminate her pregnancy because of a health risk, one of her colleagues hit her with a folder. All this mistreatment stems from the idea that people who do abortions are morally inferior.”

    Why does this matter? You may ask.

    When health professionals trying to care for their patients are prevented from doing their jobs, it is the most vulnerable who end up at high risk. It’s been long documented that limits to accessing abortion care particularly affect vulnerable populations who are unable to pay for the services in private – which is how many people access abortions in countries where the procedure is illegal.

    When health professionals trying to care for their patients are prevented from doing their jobs, it is the most vulnerable who end up at high risk.

    Fernanda Doz Costa, Director of Gender, Racial Justice, Refugees and Migrants Rights Program, Amnesty International

    These kinds of harassment campaign also have the pervasive effect of discouraging health professionals from pursuing certain specialities, which, in turn, greatly limits the availability of good quality accessible healthcare, as Dr. Gil told us.

    It’s a silent and dangerous rollback on human rights that is placing many lives at risk.

    Providing safe abortions should not be a risky job. In fact, in many countries it isn’t. There, doctors and nurses are able to care for their patients, provide information and advice about their options so they are able to make informed decisions about what is best for them and then access the services they need. Without harassment, hate campaigns and attacks, health professionals are able to do what they trained to do: save lives and support people to follow their lives plans as healthy and as free as possible.

    Over the many years we have been working, side by side millions of brave activists and organizations from across the world, to ensure abortion services are a reality for all, we asked many health professionals working in challenging environments why they do it, despite all the risks.

    Many told us of their unwavering commitment to dedicate their life to the service of humanity, to care for their patients, regardless of any considerations of creed, gender or any other factors.

    On international safe abortion day, let’s all do our part to celebrate and protect them.

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: Saudi Arabia: Highest execution toll in decades as authorities put to death 198 people

    Source: Amnesty International –

    Saudi Arabian authorities have put to death over 198 individuals so far in 2024, the highest number of executions recorded in the country since 1990, Amnesty International said today.

    Despite repeated promises to limit the use of the death penalty, Saudi authorities have ramped up executions while routinely failing to abide by international fair trial standards and safeguards for defendants. Executions for drug-related crimes soared this year, with 53 carried out so far – with an average of one execution every two days in July alone – rising from just two drug-related executions in 2023. Authorities have also weaponised the death penalty to silence political dissent, punishing citizens from the country’s Shi’a minority who supported “anti-government” protests between 2011 and 2013.

    “Saudi Arabia’s authorities are pursuing a relentless killing spree displaying a chilling disregard for human life while promoting an empty-worded campaign to rebrand their image,” said Agnès Callamard, Amnesty International’s Secretary General.

    “The death penalty is an abhorrent and inhuman punishment which Saudi Arabia has used against people for a wide range of offences, including political dissent and drug-related charges following grossly unfair trials. The authorities must immediately establish a moratorium on executions, and order re-trials for those on death row in line with international standards without resorting to the death penalty.”

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: Saudi Arabia: authorities have already executed 198 people in 2024

    Source: Amnesty International –

    Even this grim death toll may be lower than the reality due to under-reporting in the country

    The number of those put to death – including some for drugs offences – is the highest since 1990

    ‘Where else in the world is someone sentenced to death for this?’ – an Egyptian on death row after being convicted of possessing eight grams of hashish

    The Saudi Arabian authorities have put to death at least 198 people so far in 2024, the highest number of executions recorded in the country since 1990, Amnesty International said today.

    Earlier today, the official Saudi Press Agency confirmed that the 198th execution this year had been carried out, though the real number may be higher given the news agency has previously under-reported the true number of executions in the country.

    In 2022, Saudi Arabia executed 196 people – the highest annual number of executions that Amnesty had recorded in the country in the last 30 years. In March 2022, Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salma said that the country had “got rid of” the death penalty except for cases where it is mandated under Sharia. Yet, in November 2022, the authorities carried the first executions for drug-related offences in nearly three years, reversing a moratorium on executions for such offences which was announced by the Saudi Human Rights Commission in 2021.

    Earlier this year, Amnesty analysed the country’s draft penal code which codifies the death penalty as a punishment and continues to enable judges to use their discretion to impose death sentences for murder, rape, blasphemy and apostasy.

    Despite repeated promises to limit the use of the death penalty, the Saudi authorities have ramped up executions while routinely failing to abide by international fair trial standards and safeguards for defendants. Executions for drug-related crimes have soared this year, with 53 carried out so far – with an average of one execution every two days in July alone – rising from just two drug-related executions in 2023.

    The authorities have also weaponised the death penalty to silence political dissent, punishing citizens from the country’s Shi’a minority who’ve supported “anti-government” protests between 2011 and 2013. On 17 August, the Saudi Press Agency announced the execution of Abdulmajeed al-Nimr, a retired traffic police officer, for terrorism-related offences related to joining Al-Qaeda. However, his court documents tell another story about his charges, which are related to his alleged support for “anti-government” protests in the country’s Shi’a-majority Eastern Province.

    According to a court document reviewed by Amnesty, he was initially sentenced on 25 October 2021 by the Specialised Criminal Court to nine years in prison on charges of “seeking to destabilise the social fabric and national unity by participating in demonstrations … supporting riots, chanting slogans against the state and its rulers”, as well as “dissenting against the decision to arrest and prosecute wanted individuals”, and for joining a WhatsApp group that included people wanted for security purposes. On appeal, his punishment was increased to a death sentence. The court did not make a single reference to Al-Nimr’s supposed involvement with Al-Qaeda.

    After Al-Nimr’s arrest on 28 October 2017 he was denied access to a lawyer for around two years during his interrogations and pre-trial detention. He spent three months in detention without being informed of the reason for his arrest. According to the court document, Al-Nimr’s conviction was based solely on a “confession” he said was obtained under duress, including being detained in solitary confinement for a month-and-a-half. 

    Agnès Callamard, Amnesty International’s Secretary General, said: 

    “The death penalty is an abhorrent and inhuman punishment which Saudi Arabia has used against people for a wide range of offences, including political dissent and drug-related charges following grossly unfair trials. 

    “The authorities must immediately establish a moratorium on executions, and order re-trials for those on death row in line with international standards without resorting to the death penalty.”

    Executed for drugs offences 

    So far in 2024, the Saudi authorities have executed 53 people solely for drug-related offences. Only two such offences were recorded in the country in 2023. Since July, 53 people have been executed for drug-related offences, 38 of whom were foreign nationals. This spike in executions raises serious fears for the fate of dozens of prisoners convicted of similar offences and currently on death row. Earlier today, the authorities executed two Egyptian men who were detained in Tabuk Prison for drug-related crimes.

    Amnesty has previously documented the cases of four Egyptian men held on death row in Tabuk Prison for drug-related offences. The four are among a group of at least 50 people on death row for drug-related crimes in Tabuk Prisons, the majority of whom are Egyptian. 

    This month, Omar (a pseudonym), one of the detained men, told Amnesty: 

    “I’ve been on death row for seven years for the possession of eight grams of hashish. I was also convicted of the intent to receive drugs, which I didn’t confess to and have denied. Where else in the world is someone sentenced to death for this? I have asked all governmental entities who may know – from the Ministry of Interior to the Supreme Judicial Council, and no one could tell me the status of my case. My son grew up without me for seven years. This makes me feel like I’m already a dead man … A few days ago, I shared a final meal with one of my fellow inmates before he was taken to be executed the next morning. He didn’t know about his impending execution until that morning. All I want to know is the status of my case.”

    The authorities sentenced these men to death in January 2019 on various drug-related charges and upheld the sentence in November 2019. Since then, the men have received no information about the status of their case. According to the court document analysed by Amnesty, the four men had no legal representation throughout their pre-trial detention, interrogations and preliminary trial resulting in their death sentence. Following their conviction, the court stated that they have the right to a legal representative to submit appeal proceedings. However, the court only appointed a lawyer for one of the men.

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: Northern Ireland: Failure of Martin O’Hagan murder investigation has created ‘an environment of impunity’

    Source: Amnesty International –

    Martin O’Hagan with the NUJ banner on May Day in Belfast 2001 © Kevin Cooper/Photoline NUJ

    Amnesty International backs calls by NUJ for a fresh investigation into the killing

    No-one convicted in 23 years since murder of journalist

    The failure to bring to justice those responsible for the murder of Martin O’Hagan has helped create an environment of impunity for those who continue to threaten journalists in Northern Ireland today, Amnesty International has said on the eve of the twenty-third anniversary of the killing of the reporter.

    On September 28 2001, Sunday World journalist Martin O’Hagan was shot dead in Lurgan by members of an illegal paramilitary group. To this day, no one has been held to account for his brutal murder.

    Amnesty has backed National Union of Journalists (NUJ) calls for a fresh investigation into the killing.

    Journalists in Northern Ireland, particularly those covering activities by paramilitary and organised crime groups, are regularly subject to threats of violence.

    Patrick Corrigan, Amnesty International’s Northern Ireland Director, said:

    “The public execution of Martin O’Hagan was designed to send a clear message to journalists in Northern Ireland that they are not safe.

    “It is simply unacceptable that, in the twenty-three years since Martin O’Hagan was shot dead, not a single person has been held accountable.

    “This failure has created an environment of impunity for those who continue to threaten journalists in Northern Ireland today.

    “It is notable that, in 2024, threats of serious violence continue to be directed at journalists from the very same sort of armed groups which killed Martin O’Hagan.

    “We support calls from the National Union of Journalists for a fresh investigation into the killing. Press freedom must be resolutely defended.”

    View latest press releases

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: Last chance: why EU cannot afford to be silent ahead of Tunisian election

    Source: Amnesty International –

    Hussein Baoumi is Foreign Policy advocacy officer at Amnesty International’s European Institutions Office.

    This opinion piece was originally published here by EUobserver.

    When I started as a researcher with Amnesty International in 2017, I had just moved to Tunisia, a country that had inspired and given hope to millions of people across the Middle East and North Africa for its transformation after the Arab Spring protests. 

    Tunisia’s story contrasted sharply to Egypt, where I witnessed firsthand how rule of law backsliding under a repressive government devastates almost every aspect of life.

    The authorities have been supported in their campaign of repression by billions of euros in aid and loans from the EU, funds that have been handed over without any insistence that Egypt abide by the EU’s standards on human rights.

    Unless it changes course, the EU is about to make the same mistakes in Tunisia that it made in Egypt.

    In July 2021, Tunisian president Kaies Saied suspended parliament, dismissed the entire government, including the prime minister, and took executive control of the country.

    Since then, he has dismantled most independent institutions, adopted repressive decrees, severely undermined judicial independence and the rule of law, arbitrarily arrested opponents and critics, rewritten the constitution, and restricted media freedom and the work of civil society organisations. 

    Unless it changes course, the EU is about to make the same mistakes in Tunisia that it made in Egypt

    Hussein Baoumi, EU Foreign Policy Advocacy Officer

    He has labelled opponents as traitors and foreign-funded agents and launched a wave of racist violent attacks against black migrants and refugees in the country.

    These campaigns have left hundreds of victims behind bars and left others, as in the case of some refugees, to die at the borders in Libya. 

    MIL OSI NGO