Category: Politics

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Stoke-on-Trent awarded funding to help tackle homelessness and rough sleeping

    Source: City of Stoke-on-Trent

    Published: Thursday, 17th July 2025

    Partnership working to tackle homelessness and rough sleeping is set to continue across Stoke-on-Trent.

    The city council has been allocated cash from various government initiatives to support the ongoing work it is doing to help rough sleepers in Stoke-on-Trent and those facing homelessness.

    The latest round of funding – which looks set to be agreed by cabinet members at a meeting later this month –  will enable the council to continue to provide vital services to support rough sleepers and homeless individuals in the city.

    This includes extending the current agreements it has in place with partners delivering these important services, such as Brighter Futures, Honeycomb Group and the North Staffs Combined Healthcare Trust, for a further 12 months.

    It comes as Stoke-on-Trent City Council is currently reviewing its Homelessness and Rough Sleeping Strategy which sets out the authority’s vision and priorities for tackling homelessness and rough sleeping over the next five years.

    Councillor Chris Robinson, cabinet member for housing, planning and governance at Stoke-on-Trent City Council, said: “Our support services, provided with trusted partners, do a great job in supporting rough sleepers and those facing homelessness.

    “But despite those efforts, rough sleeping continues to rise – nationally and locally – due to housing pressures and the cost of living crisis. We are determined to do more.

    “We recently undertook a review into homelessness and rough sleeping to help us get an understanding of the current picture of homelessness in the city and this has given us an idea of where to focus our resources in the future.

    “Everybody has the right to a decent home, and we are determined to do everything we can to ensure everyone has the support they need to live independently.”

    Over the past three years, Stoke-on-Trent City Council has developed and delivered a range of initiatives in collaboration with partners, including:

    • A Homeless Hub which supports more than 900 people every month
    • Enhanced outreach support via the Rough Sleepers Outreach Team which has supported over 330 individuals out of rough sleeping
    • Health and mental health support to help people access universal health services and manage chronic conditions, with around 250 people accessing the service per month
    • Providing long-term accommodation options for individuals moving on from emergency off-street accommodation such as B&Bs and night shelters. This service has supported around 65 individuals during 24/25.

    Anyone concerned about a person sleeping rough, or at risk of sleeping rough, is encouraged to report it to the city council via the website or by calling the Rough Sleepers team on 0800 970 2304 which is a free phone number.

    Alternatively visit www.brighter-futures.org.uk or www.thestreetlink.org.uk.

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: New appointments to Board of the Office for Environmental Protection

    Source: United Kingdom – Government Statements

    News story

    New appointments to Board of the Office for Environmental Protection

    Two appointments and two re-appointments to the OEP Board

    Professor Elizabeth Fisher and Caroline May have been appointed as Non-Executive Directors of the Office for Environmental Protection (OEP), and Professor Dan Laffoley and Dr Paul Leinster CBE have been reappointed for second terms.

    Elizabeth Fisher’s and Caroline May’s new roles will run from 1 July 2025 until 30 June 2029. Dan Laffoley’s and Paul Leinster’s second terms will run from 1 July 2025 to 31 December 2026.

    The appointments have been made in accordance with the Ministerial Governance Code on Public Appointments published by the Cabinet Office. All appointments are made on merit and political activity plays no part in the selection process.

    The Office for Environmental Protection (OEP) was created in November 2021 under the Environment Act. It is an independent statutory body with a remit to protect and improve the environment by holding government and other public authorities to account in England and Northern Ireland.

    Biographies

    Professor Elizabeth Fisher

    • Professor Elizabeth Fisher is Professor of Environmental Law at the Faculty of Law and a Fellow of Corpus Christi College, University of Oxford.

    • She has over three decades of experience as an environmental law academic and writes widely on environmental law and administrative law in national common law jurisdictions.

    • She was General Editor of the Journal of Environmental Law from 2012 to 2022 and from 2022 to 2025 she held a Leverhulme Major Research Fellowship for a project exploring legal imagination and environmental law.

    • She is a Delegate of Oxford University Press and has served as Vice Dean of the Oxford Law Faculty. She is also an Overseas Fellow of the Australian Academy of Law and has been a Member of the OEP’s Advisory Group on Environmental Principles since 2023.

    Caroline May

    • Caroline May has been a specialist environmental  lawyer for over 35 years. She is currently head of the environment, ESG and safety practice for Europe, Middle East and Asia at global law firm Norton Rose Fulbright, where she has been a partner since 2006.

    • She is Chair of the Law Society Climate Change Committee which produced the world’s first professional services guidance on climate change.

    • She is Honorary President of the Legal Sustainability Alliance and a former Director of leading sustainability NGO, the Aldersgate Group. She sat on the National Council of the United Kingdom Environmental Law Association (UKELA) for 6 years.

    • She is a Freeman of the City of London and is listed in the Ends Power List 2024, as a Green Ambassador for the UK by Legal 500, and in the Guide to the World’s Leading Environmental Lawyers.

    Professor Dan Laffoley

    • Professor Dan Laffoley is a scientist, communicator, explorer and marine biologist, with over four decades of experience in the UK, Europe and around the world.  He is a UK and international expert on Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) and conservation.

    • He is Emeritus Marine Vice Chair of the International Union for Conservation of Nature’s World Commission on Protected Areas responsible for global targets and guidance on ocean protection.

    • Prior to that he led the development and scale-up of the marine conservation work of Natural England and English Nature. He has been responsible for the creation of many global, European and UK public and private sector partnerships, alliances and frameworks that underpin modern-day marine conservation.

    • This work includes creating the concept behind Blue Carbon, scaling up knowledge and action on ocean warming, acidification and deoxygenation, scaling-up work on marine World Heritage and conservation of the High Seas, and various global guidance on implementing MPAs and marine spatial planning.

    Dr Paul Leinster CBE

    • Dr Paul Leinster CBE has over 40 years of practical experience in environmental management, science, policy and regulatory development and implementation in the private and public sectors.

    • He is Chair of Water Resources East, the Cambridge Water Scarcity Group, the Bedfordshire Local Nature Partnership, the Great Ouse Rivers Trust, and the Upper and Bedford Ouse Catchment Partnership and is a Board Member of Delphic HSE.

    • He is a visiting professor at Cranfield University where from October 2015 to December 2020 he was Professor of Environmental Assessment and was a Member of the Government’s Natural Capital Committee.

    • Immediately prior to this, he was Chief Executive of the Environment Agency for more than seven years. Prior to joining the EA in 1998 he worked for more than 20 years in the private sector.

    Updates to this page

    Published 17 July 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: ODIHR’s latest report adds to the mountain of evidence detailing serious concerns with Russia’s actions in Ukraine: UK statement to the OSCE

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    Speech

    ODIHR’s latest report adds to the mountain of evidence detailing serious concerns with Russia’s actions in Ukraine: UK statement to the OSCE

    Ambassador Holland condemns Russia’s appalling actions in Ukraine – including civilians deaths, CRSV and widespread use of torture – as detailed in ODIHR’s seventh interim report on reported violations of international humanitarian law and international human rights law in Ukraine.

    Thank you, Mr Chair.  Today I would like to address the issue of civilian casualties from Russia’s war in Ukraine.

    Firstly, every death in this conflict is a tragedy.  These are people, not statistics, and for each life lost, many more are destroyed as a result.  We cannot allow the normalisation of such death and destruction here or anywhere else.

    Secondly, we must remember that Russia chose to start this war.  There was no threat to Russia or Russians or Russian speakers in Ukraine.  What Russia feared was Ukraine escaping Moscow’s orbit.  It feared a prosperous, successful and sovereign Ukraine on its doorstep.  The responsibility for the increased risk to Russians, Ukrainians and our collective security sits squarely with Moscow.

    But just as President Putin chose to start this war, he could choose to end it.  President Trump has called for the senseless killing to stop and proposed an immediate and unconditional ceasefire.  Ukraine agreed to it.  Russia rejected it.  Despite Moscow’s attempts to obfuscate, these are the facts.

    Thirdly, Mr Chair, when it comes to civilian casualties, let us remember that Ukraine permits access to independent organisations who provide impartial reporting and verification of developments on the ground.  Many of these, including the UN Independent International Commission of Inquiry on Ukraine, have requested equal access to Russia.  But these requests have been denied.  We strongly urge Russia to allow access by independent international bodies who can offer impartial analysis of incidents in the Russian Federation, which would be of benefit to all OSCE participating States.

    A timely example of factual reporting from an independent organisation, this week ODIHR published their seventh interim report on reported violations of international humanitarian law and international human rights law in Ukraine.  The report covers some of the deeply concerning issues that we have raised in this room.  For example, ODIHR reported that in the six months to 31 May 2025, the number of verified civilian casualties in Government-controlled areas of Ukraine was over 50% higher than in the corresponding period in 2024.

    ODIHR’s report also covered the 4 April attack on Kryvyi Rih, which involved a Russian ballistic missile hitting a playground and killing 20 civilians, including nine children.  Colleagues will remember that we held a Special Permanent Council on this shocking incident.  ODIHR states: “Following analysis of photographs and videos, as well as eye-witness statements and other publicly available evidence, ODIHR has reasonable grounds to believe that, contrary to the Russian Federation’s claims, there were no military objectives in the area immediately prior to or at the time of the strike.”

    There is much more of concern in ODIHR’s report, including testimony that conflict-related sexual violence is intensifying and increasingly cruel.  And the reconfirmation of ODIHR’s previous findings on the widespread and systematic use of torture by the Russian authorities against detained Ukrainian civilians and POWs. We are appalled by these findings and urge the full implementation of the recommendations within the report.

    Thank you, Mr Chair.

    Updates to this page

    Published 17 July 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: 16 year olds to be given right to vote through seismic government election reforms

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    Press release

    16 year olds to be given right to vote through seismic government election reforms

    Sixteen year olds will be given the right to vote in all UK elections as part of seismic changes to modernise UK democracy

    • Modernisation of UK democracy will see 16 and 17 year olds able to vote in next general election
    • Voter ID to be extended to include bank cards to help more people exercise their democratic right
    • Tougher new rules to guard against foreign political interference and abuse of campaigners

    Sixteen year olds will be given the right to vote in all UK elections as part of seismic changes to modernise UK democracy, delivering a key manifesto commitment and helping to restore trust in politics through our Plan for Change.         

    This will mean young people, who already contribute to society by working, paying taxes and serving in the military, will be given the right to vote on the issues that affect them. This will bring UK-wide elections in line with Scotland and Wales and is a major step towards meeting a manifesto commitment, ushering in the biggest change to UK democracy in a generation. 

    The plans, published today [17 July] in a new strategy paper, will boost democratic engagement in a changing world, and help to restore trust in UK democracy.     

    As part of the plans, the government is going further to make sure eligible voters are not deterred from voting, by expanding voter ID to permit the use of UK-issued bank cards as an accepted form of ID at the polling station. This is alongside harnessing more digital options to support voters and polling station staff, including allowing accepted IDs such as the Veteran Card and UK driving licence to be used at polling stations when they become available in digital format.  

    A new digital Voter Authority Certificate will also be created to ensure Electoral Registration Officers can meet the digital needs of voters, reduce printing costs and ensure faster delivery.  

    An increasingly automated voter registration system will also make it easier for people to register to vote and reduce the need to fill out their details across different government services on multiple occasions.      

    Major new changes will boost transparency and accountability in politics by closing loopholes that would allow foreign donors via ‘shell companies’ to influence UK political parties. Meanwhile, new requirements on unincorporated associations will mandate checks on donations over £500 to tackle foreign interference and protect UK democracy from those who attempt to undermine it.   

    Alongside this, the reforms will allow the Electoral Commission to take action and enforce heavier fines of up to £500,000 on those who breach political finance rules, and enable tougher sentences for those who abuse election campaigners – stabilising the foundations of UK democracy.     

    Deputy Prime Minister, Angela Rayner said:       

    “For too long public trust in our democracy has been damaged and faith in our institutions has been allowed to decline.       

    “We are taking action to break down barriers to participation that will ensure more people have the opportunity to engage in UK democracy, supporting our Plan for Change, and delivering on our manifesto commitment to give sixteen year olds the right to vote.   

    “We cannot take our democracy for granted, and by protecting our elections from abuse and boosting participation we will strengthen the foundations of our society for the future.”       

    Minister for Democracy, Rushanara Ali, said:    

    “We are modernising our democracy, so that it is fit for the 21st century. By delivering our manifesto commitment to extend the vote to 16 and 17 year olds, we are taking a generational step forward in restoring public trust and boosting engagement in UK democracy, supporting our Plan for Change.    

    “By reinforcing safeguards against foreign interference, we will strengthen our democratic institutions and protect them for future generations.”   

    Alongside expanding the right to vote, we are going further to restore and maintain public trust by ensuring elections are as accessible as possible for legitimate voters.      

    That’s why the government is making common sense changes to move towards an automated electoral registration system, stripping complexities and barriers for voters to make their lives easier. Learning from countries such as Australia and Canada, which have high rates of legitimate voter registration via automated systems, the government will bring the UK’s democracy into the 21st century.    

    At the same time, far too many people are being deterred from voting because of voter ID rules, with the Electoral Commission finding that 4% of non-voters at the 2024 General Election saying that a lack of voter ID was a key reason they didn’t vote, equating to around three quarters of a million people across Great Britain.   

    Boosting participation is crucial to restoring faith in democracy, and adding the Veteran ID card last year to the accepted forms of Voter ID was just the start of this. Through the new plans, the government is going further to allow UK-issued bank cards to be used as ID when voting, making it far easier for more voters to meet the requirements.     

    This change will allow us to continue to protect the integrity of the UK electoral system, while allowing greater accessibility. Bank cards, which are issued after the applicant has passed necessary security checks for a bank account, will add a widely and commonly carried item to the range of documents already accepted. Research on the ownership of bank cards shows that over 96% of the UK population has a bank account, with the majority expected to also have a bank card.   

    These measures will strike the right balance by continuing to protect voters from the risk of impersonation, while also removing barriers to ensure legitimate voters are not prevented or discouraged from exercising their right to vote.      

    Another key aspect of the reforms is ensuring UK democracy is protected and all voters, candidates, campaigners and electoral staff are safe from intimidation, harassment and abuse.    

    This behaviour is on the rise, particularly against women and ethnic minorities – with recent Electoral Commission research showing 55% of candidates at the 2024 General Election experienced abuse. The reforms will crack down on these unacceptable practices, delivering tougher sentences for those who intimidate campaigners and stronger protections for candidates in public life by removing the requirement for their home address to be published and openly available.    

    This supports ongoing work including through the Defending Democracy Taskforce, which was given a new mandate by the Prime Minister to coordinate and drive forward government’s response to the full range of threats to UK democracy.    

    That includes working across government with the police, parliamentary authorities, and the Electoral Commission to actively review our levers to tackle the harassment and intimidation of elected representatives, candidates, and electoral staff.  

    In relation to political finance, the changes being brought by the government will effectively meet an evolving and sophisticated threat of illicit money being funnelled from abroad to political parties. Tough new rules will ensure that in the future, ‘shell companies’ will not be permitted to make political donations to UK political parties.  

    This will end the status quo, where a new company registered today, owned by anyone, funded from anywhere, without even a single day of trade, can donate and have influence in UK politics.     

    The introduction of ‘Know your Donor’ checks will increase scrutiny of donations, requiring recipients to conduct enhanced checks to decrease the risk of illegitimate donations entering our system, guarding against foreign interference. This will close loopholes, reinforce our democracy and protect our citizens from those who seek to undermine and harm our society.    

    Further information:      

    • To deliver these changes, we will bring forward an elections bill. The bill will deliver the Government’s manifesto commitments and wider ambitions set out in this Strategy by putting in place the legislation required for these important reforms.
    • A subsequent programme of secondary legislation will set out the detail for implementation and we will provide more detail on implementation timings in due course.

    Updates to this page

    Published 17 July 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Sadiq to host first-ever mayoral London-Africa business summit to attract new foreign investment to the capital and boost trade links across the continent

    Source: Mayor of London

    • Mayor of London, Sadiq Khan, announces City Hall’s first-ever London-Africa business summit to be held next year
    • Sadiq is in Africa this week – he is the first ever London Mayor to lead a trade delegation to the continent to drive trade and investment and strengthen cultural links
    • Summit in London next year will bring together entrepreneurs and investors, state officials, mayors, trade groups and stock exchanges from across the African continent, to attract foreign investment to the capital and boost trade links
    • Sadiq declares that expanding ties with Africa will be key to delivering his international trade ambitions for London
    • New figures reveal that UK bilateral trade with Africa is currently worth almost £50 billion [1] and projected to be worth £62 billion by 2030

    The Mayor of London, Sadiq Khan, has today announced that City Hall will host its first-ever London-Africa business summit next year as he revealed that the UK’s bilateral trade with the African continent is likely to reach £62 billion ($79 billion) by 2030. [2]

    The Summit will bring together entrepreneurs and investors, state officials, mayors, trade groups and stock exchanges from across the continent, with the aim of promoting London as the best global city for African businesses to expand and invest in.

    It will focus on strengthening trade and investment links both ways, and the opportunities that can be unlocked for both London and Africa via key growth sectors, including fintech, creative industries, education and sustainability.

    The announcement comes as Sadiq this week leads a trade mission to Nigeria, Ghana and South Africa to bang the drum for London as a place to invest and do business, making him the first London Mayor to do so.

    The Mayor is determined to meet the goals of his Growth Plan and has doubled down on his commitment to attract foreign direct investment to help grow London’s economy by £107 billion by 2035 and create 150,000 good jobs by 2028.

    Africa’s economic growth is expected to accelerate, with several African countries projected to rank among the top 10 fastest-growing economies globally in 2025. [3]

    The bilateral trade relationship between Africa and the UK has shown consistent growth over recent years, despite global challenges. More businesses from London expand into Africa than from any other city globally and the UK stands as one of Africa’s significant trading partners, with trade between the UK and Africa worth nearly £50 billion ($63 billion) in 2024 and UK exports up seven per cent year on year [4].

    Since 2013, London has been the leading destination city for African FDI in Europe and the US with 72 projects, and ranks as the second most popular destination globally outside Africa — behind only Dubai (202 projects) and ahead of Paris (63 projects). [5] Over the past decade, there have been a total of 71 projects recorded from Africa to London, accounting for an estimated £578 million in Capital Expenditure and creating 2,145 jobs. [6]

    Sadiq is visiting Lagos in Nigeria, Accra in Ghana, and Johannesburg and Cape Town in South Africa this week to build on extensive connections between the region and the capital’s growing African diaspora, and boost trade links with London. Alongside the visit, the Mayor’s growth agency London & Partners is hosting a trade delegation of 36 London-based companies that are looking to grow their business and access opportunities in Africa.   

    The Mayor of London, Sadiq Khan, said: “Trade between the UK and Africa is projected to be worth £62 billion by 2030. Whether its their tech start ups or business and financial services, London is perfectly placed to benefit from Africa’s growth.

    “Today I am announcing that City Hall will host the first-ever mayoral London-Africa business summit to tap into the huge economic opportunities that a strong, mutual relationship with the continent can bring.

    “Expanding ties with Africa will be key to delivering our international trade ambitions, creating thousands of good jobs in the next five years and beyond.

    “London has a rich history with the continent through our diaspora communities. I’m proud to be the first Mayor of London to visit Africa to drive trade and investment and strengthen our cultural links as we work to build a better, more prosperous city for everyone.”

    With nearly eight per cent of Londoners being of African heritage [7] and African students studying in London accounting for four per cent of all international students, half of whom are studying at post-graduate level, [8] the Summit will be a landmark opportunity for London to build on its strong cultural links and history with the African continent.

    The Mayor is keen to tap into Africa’s successes as a growing tech hub and has already begun to establish relationships with cities leading in this space, including Lagos in Nigeria which has generated five tech ‘unicorns’ [9] – startup companies valued at over US$1 billion – and is ranked as the world’s fastest-growing tech hub by global data analysts Dealroom [10].

    Accra, the capital of Ghana has also been highlighted by Dealroom [11] as an up-and-coming business sector with a tech hub that punches above its weight in innovation startup activity, research output, and university-industry collaboration.

    Foreign Secretary David Lammy said: “London is a global city, where the world comes to do business.

    “The UK is committed to a new approach with African countries – rooted in partnership, not paternalism and built on mutual respect. By bringing together investors, innovators and decisions-makers the London-Africa Business Summit will strengthen those ties and unlock growth and prosperity.

    Laura Citron, CEO of London & Partners said: “We’re proud to be joining the Mayor on this historic visit to Africa. It’s an exciting opportunity to explore the continent’s dynamic growth sectors, as well as discovering how their innovation and ambition can inspire new approaches back home in London. With next year’s first Africa–London Summit, this trip is a pivotal moment to build lasting partnerships, unlock new opportunities, and strengthen business ties between our regions.”

    Adjoba Kyiamah, Executive Director of the UK-Ghana Chamber of Commerce, said: “We welcome the Mayor’s first-ever London-Africa business summit next year, to forge deeper, mutually prosperous ties between London and Ghana.

    “As Accra continues to emerge as a vibrant tech hub, this summit will be a crucial platform to unlock new opportunities, benefiting businesses and ensuring economic prosperity in both London and Accra.

    “As the leading private sector voice of the UK-Ghana business community in Ghana, we are committed to promoting bilateral trade and investment between Ghana and the UK. We are thus encouraged by the summit’s focus on key growth sectors such as fintech, creative industries, education, and sustainability, which hold immense potential for mutual prosperity.”

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-Evening Report: 12 countries agree to confront Israel collectively over Gaza after Bogotá summit

    ANALYSIS: By Mick Hall

    Collective measures to confront Israel’s genocide of the Palestinian people have been agreed by 12 nations after an emergency summit of the Hague Group in Bogotá, Colombia.

    A joint statement today announced the six measures, which it said were geared to holding Israel to account for its crimes in Palestine and would operate within the states’ domestic legal and legislative frameworks.

    Nearly two dozen other nations in attendance at the summit are now pondering whether to sign up to the measures before a September deadline set by the Hague Group.

    New Zealand and Australia stayed away from the summit.

    The measures include preventing the provision or transfer of arms, munitions, military fuel and dual-use items to Israel and preventing the transit, docking or servicing of vessels if there is a risk of vessels carrying such items. No vessel under the flag of the countries would be allowed to carry this equipment.

    The countries would also “commence an urgent review of all public contracts, in order to prevent public institutions and public funds, where applicable, from supporting Israel’s illegal occupation of the Palestinian Territory which may entrench its unlawful presence in the territory, to ensure that our nationals, and companies and entities under our jurisdiction, as well as our authorities, do not act in any way that would entail recognition or provide aid or assistance in maintaining the situation created by Israel’s illegal presence in the Occupied Palestinian Territory”.

    The countries will prosecute “the most serious crimes under international law through robust, impartial and independent investigations and prosecutions at national or international levels, in compliance with our obligation to ensure justice for all victims and the prevention of future crimes”.

    They agreed to support universal jurisdiction mandates, “as and where applicable in our legal constitutional frameworks and judiciaries, to ensure justice for all victims and the prevention of future crimes in the Occupied Palestine Territory”.

    This will mean IDF soldiers and others accused of war crimes in Palestine would face arrest and could go through domestic judicial processes in these countries, or referrals to the ICC.

    The statement said the measures constituted a collective commitment to defend the foundational principles of international law.

    It also called on the UN Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) to commission an immediate investigation of the health and nutritional needs of the population of Gaza, devise a plan to meet those needs on a continuing and sustained basis, and report on these matters before the 80th session of the United Nations General Assembly in September.

    Following repeated total blockades of Gaza since October 7, 2023, Gazans have been dying of starvation as they continue to be bombed and repeatedly displaced and their means of life destroyed.

    The official death toll stands at nearly 59,000, mostly women and children, although some estimates put that number at over 200,000.

    The joint statement recognised Israel as a threat to regional peace and the system of international law and called on all United Nations member states to enforce their obligations under the UN charter.

    It condemned “unilateral attacks and threats against United Nations mandate holders, as well as key institutions of the human rights architecture and international justice” and committed to build “on the legacy of global solidarity movements that have dismantled apartheid and other oppressive systems, setting a model for future co-ordinated responses to international law violations”.

    Countries face wrath of US
    Ministers, high-ranking officials and envoys from 30 nations attended the two-day event, from July 15-16, called to come up with the measures. It is now hoped some of those attendees will sign up to the statement by September.

    For countries like Ireland, which sent a delegation, signing up would have profound implications. The Irish government has been heavily criticised by its own citizens for continuing to allow Shannon Airport as a transit point for military equipment from the United States to be sent to Israel.

    It would also face the prospect of severe reprisals by the US, as would others thinking of adding their names to the collective statement. The US is now expected to consult with nations that attended and warn them of the consequences of signing up.

    The summit had been billed by the UN Rapporteur for Human Rights in the Occupied Palestinian Territories, Francesca Albanese, as “the most significant political development of the last 20 months”.

    Albanese had told attendees that “for too long, international law has been treated as optional — applied selectively to those perceived as weak, ignored by those acting as the powerful”.

    “This double standard has eroded the very foundations of the legal order. That era must end,” she said.

    Co-chaired by Colombia and South Africa, the Hague group was established by nine nations in late January at The Hague in the Netherlands to hold Israel to account for its crimes and push for Palestinian self-determination.

    Colombia last year ended diplomatic relations with Israel, while South Africa in late December 2023 filed an application at the International Court of Justice (ICJ) accusing Israel of genocide, which was joined by nearly two dozen countries.

    The ICJ has determined a plausible genocide is taking place and issued orders for Israel to protect Palestinians and take measures to stop genocide taking place, a call ignored by the Zionist state.

    Representatives from the countries arrived in Bogota this week in defiance of the United States, which last week sanctioned Albanese for attempts to have US and Israeli political officials and business leaders prosecuted by the ICC over Gaza.

    Secretary of State Marco Rubio called it an illegitimate “campaign of political and economic warfare”.

    It followed the sanctioning of four ICC judges after arrest warrants were issued in November last year for Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former defence minister Yoav Gallant, for crimes against humanity and war crimes.

    Ahead of the Bogota meeting, the US State Department accused The Hague Group of multilateral attempts to “weaponise international law as a tool to advance radical anti-Western agendas” and warned the US would “aggressively defend” its interests.

    Signs of division in the West
    Most of those attending came from nations in the Global South, but not all.

    Founding Hague Group members Belize, Bolivia, Colombia, Cuba, Honduras, Malaysia, Namibia, Senegal and South Africa attended the Summit. Joining them were Algeria, Bangladesh, Botswana, Brazil, Chile, China, Djibouti, Indonesia, Iraq, Republic of Ireland, Lebanon, Libya, Mexico, Nicaragua, Oman, Pakistan, Palestine, Qatar, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Uruguay, and Venezuela.

    However, in a sign of increasing division in the West, NATO members Spain, Portugal, Norway, Slovenia and Turkey also attended.

    Inside the summit, former US State Department official Annelle Sheline, who resigned in March over Gaza, defended the right of those attending “to uphold their obligations under the UN Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide”.

    “This is not the weaponisation of international law. This is the application of international law,” she told delegates.

    The US and Israel deny accusations that genocide is taking place in Gaza, while Western media have collectively refused to adjudicate the claims or frame stories around Israel’s ethnic cleansing of the strip, despite ample evidence by the UN and genocide experts.

    Since 7 October 2023, US allies have offered diplomatic cover for Israel by repeating it had “a right to defend itself” and was engaged in a legitimate defensive “war against Hamas”.

    Israel now plans to corral starving Gazans into a concentration camp in the south of the strip, with many analysts expecting the IDF to exterminate anyone found outside its boundaries, while preparing to push those inside across the border into Egypt.

    Asia Pacific and EU allies shun Bogota summit
    Addressing attendees at the summit yesterday, Albanese criticised the EU for its neo-colonialism and support for Israel, criticisms that can be extended to US allies in the Asia Pacific region.

    Independent journalist Abby Martin reported Albanese as saying: “Europe and its institutions are guided more by colonial mindset than principle, acting as vessels to US Empire even as it drags us from war to war, misery to misery.

    “The Hague Group is a new moral centre in world politics. Millions are hoping for leadership that can birth a new global order, rooted in justice, humanity and collective liberation. It’s not just about Palestine. This is about all of us.”

    The Australian Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade was asked why Foreign Minister Penny Wong did not take up an invite to attend the Hague Group meeting. In a statement to Mick Hall in Context, a spokesperson said she had been unable to attend, but did not explain why.

    She said Australia was a “resolute defender of international law” and added: “Australia has consistently been part of international calls that all parties must abide by international humanitarian law. Not enough has been done to protect civilians and aid workers.

    “We have called on Israel to respond substantively to the ICJ’s advisory opinion on the legal consequences arising from Israel’s policies and practices in the Occupied Palestinian Territories.

    “We have also called on Israel to comply with the binding orders of the ICJ, including to enable the unhindered provision of basic services and humanitarian assistance at scale.”

    When asked why New Zealand’s Foreign Minister Winston Peters had failed to take up the invitation or send any of his officials, a Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade (MFAT) spokesperson simply refused to comment.

    She said MFAT media advisors would only engage with “recognised news media outlets”.

    Australia’s Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and New Zealand’s Prime Minister Christopher Luxon, as well as a number of his ministers, have been referred to the ICC by domestic legal teams, accused of complicity in the genocide.

    Evidence against Albanese was accepted into the ICC’s wider investigation of crimes in Gaza in October last year, while Luxon’s referral earlier this month is being assessed by the Chief Prosecutor’s Office.

    Delegates told humanity at stake
    Delegates heard several impassioned addresses from speakers on what was at stake during the two-day event in Bogota.

    Palestinian-American trauma surgeon, Dr Thaer Ahmad, told the gathering that Palestinians seeking food were being met with bullets, describing aid distribution facilities set up by the US contractor-run Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) as “slaughterhouses”. More than 800 starving Gazans have been killed at the GHF aid points so far.

    “People know they could die but cannot sit idly by and watch their families starve,” he said.

    “The bullets fired by GHF mercenaries are just one part of the weaponisation of aid, where Palestinians are ghettoised into areas where somebody in military fatigues decides if you are worthy of food or not.”

    Palestinian diplomat Riyad Mansour had urged the summit attendees to take decisive action to not only save the Palestinian people, but redeem humanity.

    “Instead of outrage at the crimes we know are taking place, we find those who defend, normalise, and even celebrate them,” he said.

    “The core values we believed humanity agreed were universal are shattered, blown to pieces like the tens of thousands of starved, murdered and injured civilians in Palestine.

    “The mind and heart cannot fathom or process the immense pain and horror that has taken hold of the lives of an entire people. We must not fail — not just for Palestine’s sake — but for humanity’s sake.”

    At the beginning of the summit, Colombian Deputy Foreign Minister Mauricio Jaramillo Jassir told summit delegates the Palestinian genocide threatened the entire international system.

    Colombian President Gustavo Petro wrote in The Guardian last week: “We can either stand firm in defence of the legal principles that seek to prevent war and conflict, or watch helplessly as the international system collapses under the weight of unchecked power politics.”

    Meanwhile, EU foreign ministers, as well as Israel’s Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar and Syrian counterpart, Asaad Hassan al-Shaibani, met in Brussels at the same time as the Bogota summit, to discuss Middle East co-operation, but also possible options for action against Israel.

    At the EU–Southern Neighbourhood Ministerial Meeting, EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas put forward potential actions after Israel was found to have breached the EU economic cooperation deal with the bloc on human rights grounds. As expected, no sanctions, restricted trade or suspension of the co-operation deal were agreed.

    The EU has been one of Israel’s most strident backers in its campaign against Gaza, with EU members Germany and France in particular supplying weapons, as well as political support.

    The UK government has continued to supply arms and operate spy planes over Gaza over the past 21 months, launched from bases in Cyprus, while its military has issued D-Notices to censor media reports that its special forces have been operating inside the occupied territories.

    Mick Hall is an independent Irish-New Zealand journalist, formerly of RNZ and AAP, based in New Zealand since 2009. He writes primarily on politics, corporate power and international affairs. This article is republished from his substack Mick Hall in Context with permission.

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-Evening Report: 12 countries agree to confront Israel collectively over Gaza after Bogotá summit

    ANALYSIS: By Mick Hall

    Collective measures to confront Israel’s genocide of the Palestinian people have been agreed by 12 nations after an emergency summit of the Hague Group in Bogotá, Colombia.

    A joint statement today announced the six measures, which it said were geared to holding Israel to account for its crimes in Palestine and would operate within the states’ domestic legal and legislative frameworks.

    Nearly two dozen other nations in attendance at the summit are now pondering whether to sign up to the measures before a September deadline set by the Hague Group.

    New Zealand and Australia stayed away from the summit.

    The measures include preventing the provision or transfer of arms, munitions, military fuel and dual-use items to Israel and preventing the transit, docking or servicing of vessels if there is a risk of vessels carrying such items. No vessel under the flag of the countries would be allowed to carry this equipment.

    The countries would also “commence an urgent review of all public contracts, in order to prevent public institutions and public funds, where applicable, from supporting Israel’s illegal occupation of the Palestinian Territory which may entrench its unlawful presence in the territory, to ensure that our nationals, and companies and entities under our jurisdiction, as well as our authorities, do not act in any way that would entail recognition or provide aid or assistance in maintaining the situation created by Israel’s illegal presence in the Occupied Palestinian Territory”.

    The countries will prosecute “the most serious crimes under international law through robust, impartial and independent investigations and prosecutions at national or international levels, in compliance with our obligation to ensure justice for all victims and the prevention of future crimes”.

    They agreed to support universal jurisdiction mandates, “as and where applicable in our legal constitutional frameworks and judiciaries, to ensure justice for all victims and the prevention of future crimes in the Occupied Palestine Territory”.

    This will mean IDF soldiers and others accused of war crimes in Palestine would face arrest and could go through domestic judicial processes in these countries, or referrals to the ICC.

    The statement said the measures constituted a collective commitment to defend the foundational principles of international law.

    It also called on the UN Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) to commission an immediate investigation of the health and nutritional needs of the population of Gaza, devise a plan to meet those needs on a continuing and sustained basis, and report on these matters before the 80th session of the United Nations General Assembly in September.

    Following repeated total blockades of Gaza since October 7, 2023, Gazans have been dying of starvation as they continue to be bombed and repeatedly displaced and their means of life destroyed.

    The official death toll stands at nearly 59,000, mostly women and children, although some estimates put that number at over 200,000.

    The joint statement recognised Israel as a threat to regional peace and the system of international law and called on all United Nations member states to enforce their obligations under the UN charter.

    It condemned “unilateral attacks and threats against United Nations mandate holders, as well as key institutions of the human rights architecture and international justice” and committed to build “on the legacy of global solidarity movements that have dismantled apartheid and other oppressive systems, setting a model for future co-ordinated responses to international law violations”.

    Countries face wrath of US
    Ministers, high-ranking officials and envoys from 30 nations attended the two-day event, from July 15-16, called to come up with the measures. It is now hoped some of those attendees will sign up to the statement by September.

    For countries like Ireland, which sent a delegation, signing up would have profound implications. The Irish government has been heavily criticised by its own citizens for continuing to allow Shannon Airport as a transit point for military equipment from the United States to be sent to Israel.

    It would also face the prospect of severe reprisals by the US, as would others thinking of adding their names to the collective statement. The US is now expected to consult with nations that attended and warn them of the consequences of signing up.

    The summit had been billed by the UN Rapporteur for Human Rights in the Occupied Palestinian Territories, Francesca Albanese, as “the most significant political development of the last 20 months”.

    Albanese had told attendees that “for too long, international law has been treated as optional — applied selectively to those perceived as weak, ignored by those acting as the powerful”.

    “This double standard has eroded the very foundations of the legal order. That era must end,” she said.

    Co-chaired by Colombia and South Africa, the Hague group was established by nine nations in late January at The Hague in the Netherlands to hold Israel to account for its crimes and push for Palestinian self-determination.

    Colombia last year ended diplomatic relations with Israel, while South Africa in late December 2023 filed an application at the International Court of Justice (ICJ) accusing Israel of genocide, which was joined by nearly two dozen countries.

    The ICJ has determined a plausible genocide is taking place and issued orders for Israel to protect Palestinians and take measures to stop genocide taking place, a call ignored by the Zionist state.

    Representatives from the countries arrived in Bogota this week in defiance of the United States, which last week sanctioned Albanese for attempts to have US and Israeli political officials and business leaders prosecuted by the ICC over Gaza.

    Secretary of State Marco Rubio called it an illegitimate “campaign of political and economic warfare”.

    It followed the sanctioning of four ICC judges after arrest warrants were issued in November last year for Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former defence minister Yoav Gallant, for crimes against humanity and war crimes.

    Ahead of the Bogota meeting, the US State Department accused The Hague Group of multilateral attempts to “weaponise international law as a tool to advance radical anti-Western agendas” and warned the US would “aggressively defend” its interests.

    Signs of division in the West
    Most of those attending came from nations in the Global South, but not all.

    Founding Hague Group members Belize, Bolivia, Colombia, Cuba, Honduras, Malaysia, Namibia, Senegal and South Africa attended the Summit. Joining them were Algeria, Bangladesh, Botswana, Brazil, Chile, China, Djibouti, Indonesia, Iraq, Republic of Ireland, Lebanon, Libya, Mexico, Nicaragua, Oman, Pakistan, Palestine, Qatar, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Uruguay, and Venezuela.

    However, in a sign of increasing division in the West, NATO members Spain, Portugal, Norway, Slovenia and Turkey also attended.

    Inside the summit, former US State Department official Annelle Sheline, who resigned in March over Gaza, defended the right of those attending “to uphold their obligations under the UN Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide”.

    “This is not the weaponisation of international law. This is the application of international law,” she told delegates.

    The US and Israel deny accusations that genocide is taking place in Gaza, while Western media have collectively refused to adjudicate the claims or frame stories around Israel’s ethnic cleansing of the strip, despite ample evidence by the UN and genocide experts.

    Since 7 October 2023, US allies have offered diplomatic cover for Israel by repeating it had “a right to defend itself” and was engaged in a legitimate defensive “war against Hamas”.

    Israel now plans to corral starving Gazans into a concentration camp in the south of the strip, with many analysts expecting the IDF to exterminate anyone found outside its boundaries, while preparing to push those inside across the border into Egypt.

    Asia Pacific and EU allies shun Bogota summit
    Addressing attendees at the summit yesterday, Albanese criticised the EU for its neo-colonialism and support for Israel, criticisms that can be extended to US allies in the Asia Pacific region.

    Independent journalist Abby Martin reported Albanese as saying: “Europe and its institutions are guided more by colonial mindset than principle, acting as vessels to US Empire even as it drags us from war to war, misery to misery.

    “The Hague Group is a new moral centre in world politics. Millions are hoping for leadership that can birth a new global order, rooted in justice, humanity and collective liberation. It’s not just about Palestine. This is about all of us.”

    The Australian Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade was asked why Foreign Minister Penny Wong did not take up an invite to attend the Hague Group meeting. In a statement to Mick Hall in Context, a spokesperson said she had been unable to attend, but did not explain why.

    She said Australia was a “resolute defender of international law” and added: “Australia has consistently been part of international calls that all parties must abide by international humanitarian law. Not enough has been done to protect civilians and aid workers.

    “We have called on Israel to respond substantively to the ICJ’s advisory opinion on the legal consequences arising from Israel’s policies and practices in the Occupied Palestinian Territories.

    “We have also called on Israel to comply with the binding orders of the ICJ, including to enable the unhindered provision of basic services and humanitarian assistance at scale.”

    When asked why New Zealand’s Foreign Minister Winston Peters had failed to take up the invitation or send any of his officials, a Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade (MFAT) spokesperson simply refused to comment.

    She said MFAT media advisors would only engage with “recognised news media outlets”.

    Australia’s Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and New Zealand’s Prime Minister Christopher Luxon, as well as a number of his ministers, have been referred to the ICC by domestic legal teams, accused of complicity in the genocide.

    Evidence against Albanese was accepted into the ICC’s wider investigation of crimes in Gaza in October last year, while Luxon’s referral earlier this month is being assessed by the Chief Prosecutor’s Office.

    Delegates told humanity at stake
    Delegates heard several impassioned addresses from speakers on what was at stake during the two-day event in Bogota.

    Palestinian-American trauma surgeon, Dr Thaer Ahmad, told the gathering that Palestinians seeking food were being met with bullets, describing aid distribution facilities set up by the US contractor-run Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) as “slaughterhouses”. More than 800 starving Gazans have been killed at the GHF aid points so far.

    “People know they could die but cannot sit idly by and watch their families starve,” he said.

    “The bullets fired by GHF mercenaries are just one part of the weaponisation of aid, where Palestinians are ghettoised into areas where somebody in military fatigues decides if you are worthy of food or not.”

    Palestinian diplomat Riyad Mansour had urged the summit attendees to take decisive action to not only save the Palestinian people, but redeem humanity.

    “Instead of outrage at the crimes we know are taking place, we find those who defend, normalise, and even celebrate them,” he said.

    “The core values we believed humanity agreed were universal are shattered, blown to pieces like the tens of thousands of starved, murdered and injured civilians in Palestine.

    “The mind and heart cannot fathom or process the immense pain and horror that has taken hold of the lives of an entire people. We must not fail — not just for Palestine’s sake — but for humanity’s sake.”

    At the beginning of the summit, Colombian Deputy Foreign Minister Mauricio Jaramillo Jassir told summit delegates the Palestinian genocide threatened the entire international system.

    Colombian President Gustavo Petro wrote in The Guardian last week: “We can either stand firm in defence of the legal principles that seek to prevent war and conflict, or watch helplessly as the international system collapses under the weight of unchecked power politics.”

    Meanwhile, EU foreign ministers, as well as Israel’s Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar and Syrian counterpart, Asaad Hassan al-Shaibani, met in Brussels at the same time as the Bogota summit, to discuss Middle East co-operation, but also possible options for action against Israel.

    At the EU–Southern Neighbourhood Ministerial Meeting, EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas put forward potential actions after Israel was found to have breached the EU economic cooperation deal with the bloc on human rights grounds. As expected, no sanctions, restricted trade or suspension of the co-operation deal were agreed.

    The EU has been one of Israel’s most strident backers in its campaign against Gaza, with EU members Germany and France in particular supplying weapons, as well as political support.

    The UK government has continued to supply arms and operate spy planes over Gaza over the past 21 months, launched from bases in Cyprus, while its military has issued D-Notices to censor media reports that its special forces have been operating inside the occupied territories.

    Mick Hall is an independent Irish-New Zealand journalist, formerly of RNZ and AAP, based in New Zealand since 2009. He writes primarily on politics, corporate power and international affairs. This article is republished from his substack Mick Hall in Context with permission.

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-OSI Africa: Yinson Production’s Titus de Greeff Joins African Energy Week (AEW) 2025 to Discuss Innovative Floating Production Storage and Offloading (FPSO) Solutions

    Source: APO – Report:

    Titus de Greeff, Head of Corporate Finance for Western Hemisphere at Yinson Production, has confirmed his participation as a speaker at African Energy Week (AEW): Invest in African Energies 2025, taking place from September 29 to October 3 in Cape Town. His participation comes as Yinson Production scales up its low-carbon energy solutions and deepens its footprint across Africa’s offshore oil and gas sector through innovation, strategic investments and clean technology integration.

    As Yinson Production continues to expand its footprint across the continent, the company recently made a strategic stopover in Namibia, engaging with regional stakeholders and presenting its sustainability-focused offshore energy solutions. As Namibia rapidly rises as a frontier market for hydrocarbons, Yinson Production’s presence underscores its intent to support responsible development through FPSO systems equipped with carbon-reducing technologies.

    Yinson Production’s pioneering efforts are further exemplified by the FPSO Agogo, which will operate offshore Angola has part of the Agogo Integrated West Hub development. The vessel incorporates a suite of low-carbon technologies including a close flare system, hydrocarbon blanketing, combined cycle systems, automated process controls and all-electric drives. These innovations are expected to significantly reduce carbon emissions from FPSO operations and support Yinson Production’s target of achieving carbon neutrality by 2030 and net-zero emissions by 2050. The Agogo project will develop two deepwater discoveries – Agogo and Ndungu – in Block 15/06, located approximately 20km west of the operational FPSO N’Goma. This development positions Yinson Productions at the center of Angola’s next wave of deepwater growth while reinforcing the company’s commitment to cleaner offshore production.

    Recognizing the importance of carbon capture and storage (CCS) in the global energy transition, Yinson Production has also expanded its decarbonization portfolio through key investments. In 2024, the company acquired Norway-based CCS business Stella Maris and made a strategic investment in Ionada, a technology firm specializing in compact carbon capture systems. These moves reflect Yinson Production’s intent to integrate CCS into its FPSO operations and further reduce the environmental footprint of offshore energy projects.

    “Yinson Production is redefining what sustainable offshore development looks like, combining cutting-edge FPSO innovation with bold carbon reduction strategies. As Africa advances oil and gas developments – from onshore to shallow water to deepwater – solutions introduced by Yinson Productions will support successful project development,” states Tomás Gerbasio, VP of Commercial and Strategic Engagement, African Energy Chamber.

    De Greeff’s participation at AEW: Invest in African Energies 2025 is set to highlight the company’s role as a trailblazer in low-carbon energy, its support for Africa’s energy security and its contributions to sustainable oil and gas production.

    – on behalf of African Energy Chamber.

    About AEW:
    Invest in African Energies is the platform of choice for project operators, financiers, technology providers and government, and has emerged as the official place to sign deals in African energy. Visit http://www.AECWeek.com for more information about this exciting event.

    Media files

    .

    MIL OSI Africa

  • MIL-OSI Africa: Africa’s Crude Export Landscape is Shifting – What It Means for the Continent and the Industry

    Source: APO – Report:

    .

    Africa is repositioning itself in the global oil market – not merely as a supplier to international markets, but as a rising energy consumer and industrial growth hub. The newly released OPEC World Oil Outlook 2025 underscores a continent in transition, leveraging its natural resources to meet domestic demand, expand refining capacity and strengthen regional energy security. These shifts signal a maturing energy profile, one that will be at the forefront of discussions during African Energy Week 2025 (AEW): Invest in African Energies, where policymakers, investors and industry leaders will shape the future of African energy on African terms.

    Crude Exports Plateau Before Gradual Decline

    OPEC projects that Africa’s total crude and condensate exports will remain stable at around 5.2 million barrels per day (bpd) through 2035, thanks to modest increases in production. However, this steady supply will increasingly be used at home. By 2050, exports are expected to decline to 4.2 million bpd – not due to market loss, but as a result of rising domestic demand and strategic value addition on the continent.

    One of the most significant insights from the report is the continent’s growing internal energy appetite. Domestic crude use is expected to rise from 1.8 million bpd in 2024 to 4.5 million bpd by 2050, nearly tripling over the outlook period. This growth is tied to Africa’s demographic boom, industrial expansion and a concerted push to enhance local refining and downstream infrastructure. As African governments invest in capacity to process more of their own crude and produce their own fuels, the continent is taking steps toward energy independence and job creation across the value chain.

    Europe and Asia: Changing Trade Patterns

    Meanwhile, global trade patterns are shifting in ways that present new opportunities for African producers. Exports to Europe are expected to increase to a peak of 3 million bpd in 2030, before gradually tapering to 2.3 million bpd by 2050, in line with Europe’s broader energy transition and shrinking reliance on imported oil. The Asia-Pacific region is emerging as a more prominent long-term partner, with African crude exports remaining stable at 1.9 million bpd through 2030, then rising modestly to 2.2 million bpd by 2040 before easing to 1.8 million bpd by 2050.

    Trade with the U.S. and Canada, which stood at 400,000 bpd in 2024, is expected to fall to 100,000 bpd by 2045, as competition from Latin America intensifies. Yet rather than signaling decline, this trend underscores the importance of market diversification and deeper regional cooperation – a direction many African producers are already pursuing through integrated trade corridors, cross-border pipelines and African Continental Free Trade Area initiatives.

    What This Means for Africa’s Energy Strategy — and AEW

    These evolving dynamics will be a core focus at AEW 2025: Invest in African Energies, the continent’s premier platform for energy dialogue, investment and policy alignment. AEW will provide a stage for African countries to present their long-term energy strategies and forge partnerships aimed at building capacity, securing financing and scaling infrastructure. Rather than reacting to global shifts, Africa is asserting its own agenda centered on energy access, industrialization and sustainable growth.

    A dedicated OPEC roundtable at AEW will also explore the implications of the World Oil Outlook 2025 in greater depth. This forum will offer African producers and OPEC member states a chance to align on market expectations, explore new trade frameworks and identify areas for collaboration across production, refining and investment.

    “As demand at home accelerates and global market dynamics evolve, the continent is stepping into a more self-directed and strategic role in the energy world. AEW 2025 will be a critical moment to chart that course, ensuring that Africa’s oil and gas resources are harnessed not only for global supply but for African prosperity,” says NJ Ayuk, Executive Chairman, African Energy Week.

    – on behalf of African Energy Chamber.

    About AEW: Invest in African Energies: 
    AEW: Invest in African Energies is the platform of choice for project operators, financiers, technology providers and government, and has emerged as the official place to sign deals in African energy. Visit www.AECWeek.com for more information about this exciting event.

    MIL OSI Africa

  • MIL-OSI Africa: Many South Africans ‘eagerly awaiting’ National Dialogue

    Source: Government of South Africa

    As many as 737 organisations have registered their wish to participate in various elements of the National Dialogue, which will take place next month. 

    This is according to Minister in the Presidency Khumbudzo Ntshavheni, who was speaking during the debate on the Presidency Budget Vote on Wednesday.

    She said this showed that many South Africans were eagerly awaiting this process.

    The national dialogue is a historic process to bring South Africans together and chart a common path forward.

    “As the President has indicated, the national dialogue is one of the most important pillars of any thriving democracy. It is a bridge that connects government to citizens, leaders to communities, and one generation to the next. 

    “In moments of uncertainty, it provides clarity. And in seasons of transformation, it offers us direction and shared purpose. From South Africa’s own journey out of apartheid, where dialogue laid the foundation for reconciliation and democracy, the lesson is clear: when people talk— honestly, openly, and respectfully—nations change,” said the Minister.

    She said the National Dialogue was not an event but a process that would commence on 15 August and take place for a period of no less than 12 months. 

    “The national dialogue must be a culture. A culture where disagreement is not a threat, but a sign of a healthy democracy. A culture where every voice matters —whether from the hills of the rural provinces or the corridors of our cities. 

    “A culture where the youth are not just heard but involved, and where the marginalized are not only included but empowered.”

    She said to achieve these goals, the National Dialogue Preparatory Task Team and IMC have proposed an inclusive process that will be immersed in deep citizen engagements that prioritise the voice of those who feel marginalised. 

    They have identified 30 sectors around which to mobilise, with an emphasis on the diversity and inclusion of the often-marginalised sections of society. 

    In its entirety the National Dialogue will involve the following layers of conversation: 

    1. The first National Convention on 15 August 2025 with 1000 delegates. This is an agenda setting convention which will prepare the nation for the community engagements. 

    2. Community dialogues with 13400 ward-based community dialogues. 

    3. The online platform aims to reach no less than 2.5 million citizens. 

    4. There will be smaller citizen-hosted events in churches and community groups that shall have access to the toolkit being designed so that the outcomes feed into the process. 

    5. Sectoral dialogues – self organised in specific social or economic sectors which shall also have access to the toolkit so that their outcomes feed into the process.

    6. The 2nd National Convention will be the concluding event that converts the engagements into a National Compact and 30 Year Plan of Action. It is estimated that this will be about another 1000 delegates. 

    7. A detailed implementation plan. 

    8. A national roadshow to socialise the outcomes of the National Dialogue and engage with implementation partners.

    9. Independent, citizen-led monitoring and evaluation. 

    The national dialogue will promote government social cohesion efforts and strengthen social compacting as led by the Deputy President. The Deputy President-led social cohesion efforts have prioritised a focus on gender-based violence and femicide, teenage pregnancy, racism, sexism and patriarchy, as well as the role of families in building communities.

    The majority of the work of conceptualising and planning for the National Dialogue process has been undertaken by ordinary citizens from various walks of life who have volunteered their time, skills and resources to this national effort over the past 12 months, said the Minister.

    To register go to : https://nationaldialogue.org.za/. – SAnews.gov.za

    MIL OSI Africa

  • MIL-OSI Russia: Former CPPCC National Committee Bureau Member Sentenced to Death with Suspension for Bribery

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: People’s Republic of China in Russian – People’s Republic of China in Russian –

    An important disclaimer is at the bottom of this article.

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    BEIJING, July 17 (Xinhua) — Wu Yingjie, a former member of the Bureau of the National Committee of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference (CPPCC), was sentenced to death with a two-year reprieve on Wednesday for accepting bribes.

    According to the verdict handed down by the Third Intermediate People’s Court of Beijing, Wu Yingjie, who also previously served as chairman of the CPPCC National Committee’s Culture, Historical Information and Education Committee, was deprived of his political rights for life. All of his personal property and illegal income were confiscated and retained by the state.

    The court found that between June 2006 and February 2021, the defendant, while holding various positions in the Xizang Autonomous Region in southwest China, abused his official position to provide assistance to relevant organizations and third parties in matters such as concluding contracts for projects and conducting business activities, in exchange for which he received financial or material benefits from them worth more than 343 million yuan (about 48 million US dollars).

    The court found that the amount of bribes Wu Yingjie received was particularly large, the circumstances of his case were particularly aggravated, and the social consequences were extremely negative, which led to significant damage to the interests of the country and the people.

    However, the court gave Wu Yingjie a more lenient sentence given mitigating circumstances, including his reports of other people’s alleged illegal and criminal activities that were verified following the investigation, Wu Yingjie’s admission of guilt and remorse for his actions, and his active return of the property he had illegally appropriated. -0-

    Please note: This information is raw content obtained directly from the source of the information. It is an accurate report of what the source claims and does not necessarily reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    .

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI Russia: China calls for strengthening trade and economic cooperation within the SCO

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: People’s Republic of China in Russian – People’s Republic of China in Russian –

    An important disclaimer is at the bottom of this article.

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    BEIJING, July 17 (Xinhua) — Gao Yunlong, chairman of the China Association of Industry and Commerce, called for improving the quality and level of economic and trade cooperation within the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), speaking at the opening of the SCO Business Forum in Beijing on Thursday.

    Gao Yunlong, also vice chairman of the National Committee of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference (CPPCC), noted that trade and economic cooperation is a powerful engine for the dynamic development of the SCO.

    According to him, China is ready to work with all parties to further align regional development strategies, promote the improvement of the quality and level of trade and economic cooperation, and ensure the stability and continuity of production chains and supply chains.

    Gao Yunlong stressed that these efforts will be aimed at building a closer SCO community with a shared future and promoting long-term peace and common prosperity throughout the world.

    The forum, organized by the China Council for the Promotion of International Trade, brought together about 400 government and business representatives from China and abroad. -0-

    Please note: This information is raw content obtained directly from the source of the information. It is an accurate report of what the source claims and does not necessarily reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    .

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Tonbridge and Tunbridge Wells receives new flood warning service

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    Press release

    Tonbridge and Tunbridge Wells receives new flood warning service

    New warning for Southborough Stream. 106 properties in Tonbridge and Tunbridge Wells to benefit. Households urged to register for new, more targeted, service.

    Southborough Stream, which now benefits from an improved flood warning system.

    The Environment Agency has announced that they’ll be offering a new flood warning service to 106 properties in Tonbridge and Tunbridge Wells, Kent, for the Southborough Stream.

    Parts of Tonbridge and Tunbridge Wells are at risk of flooding from the Southborough Stream, which drains the north of the main Tunbridge Wells urban area, flowing north towards its meeting with the River Medway, east of Tonbridge. This stream was previously included as part of a wider flood alert area for the middle Medway and had no existing flood warning service. A new flood alert and flood warning area has now been created for the stream to allow more than 100 properties to be better prepared for flooding.

    The new areas have been created by targeting groups of households where during periods of flood risk, the chances of flooding might be greater than the larger surrounding area. This will make the flood warnings they receive more targeted and enable the homeowners to take the steps they need to respond in good time. 

    Flood Warnings tell people about an imminent risk of flooding to their home or business and helps people make informed decisions about how to respond. There are three types of warning – flood alert, flood warning and severe flood warning. Each warning type is triggered by particular weather, or river or sea conditions that cause flooding.

    Householders are encouraged to prepare if they receive a flood alert, which could mean packing a bag that includes medicines, insurance documents and anything else they wouldn’t want to lose if flooding were to take place.

    A flood warning calls on people to act now which means turning off gas, water and electricity and moving family and pets to safety.

    A severe flood warning means you are in immediate danger and to follow advice from emergency services.

    Henry Bethell, Environment Agency flood resilience team leader for Kent, said:

    We know the devastating impact that flooding can have, which is why protecting people and communities is our top priority. However, the climate emergency means we cannot prevent all flooding – so we’re working to make communities resilient to future flooding.

    We want to ensure that everyone has as much time as possible to prepare for flooding, which is why we’re pleased that people in Tonbridge and Tunbridge Wells will now be able to receive our free flood warning service for the Southborough Stream.

    Home and business owners will be automatically enrolled to the flood warning service via their mobile network. However, to get the most benefit out of the service the Environment Agency is encouraging people to register directly with them by calling Floodline on 0345 988 1188, or visiting www.gov.uk/sign-up-for-flood-warnings where they can register preferred contact details. 

    Background:

    • 6.3 million properties in England are at risk of flooding.
    • With climate change projections, 8 million properties could be at risk of flooding by mid-century.
    • The average cost of flood damage to a home is £30,000.
    • The average cost of flooding to a business is £82,000.
    • If you are flooded, temporary accommodation costs on average £10,000.
    • If you are flooded you are likely to be out of your home for an average of 5 months.
    • Know what to do when you receive a flood warning and download a personal flood plan – www.gov.uk/guidance/flood-alerts-and-warnings-what-they-are-and-what-to-do.

    All Environment Agency news releases, both area and national, can be found under Announcements at www.gov.uk/government/organisations/environment-agency.

    Follow us on Twitter, now known as X: @envagencyse

    Updates to this page

    Published 17 July 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Planning Inspectorate publishes June official statistic

    Source: United Kingdom – Government Statements

    News story

    Planning Inspectorate publishes June official statistic

    The Planning Inspectorate has published the June official statistic

    We have today published our latest official statistics on appeals performance which represents the greatest volume (in terms of number of cases) of the work of the Planning Inspectorate.

    The quarterly statistics also include our current appeals handling times to let customers know the average time it takes to receive a decision.

    Updates to this page

    Published 17 July 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: MAIB Annual Report 2024 published

    Source: United Kingdom – Government Statements

    News story

    MAIB Annual Report 2024 published

    This report provides information on the branch’s activities during 2024.

    Today, we have issued our annual report which details the work of the branch during 2024 and includes:

    • a statement from the Chief Inspector of Marine Accidents
    • an overview of accidents reported
    • a summary of investigations started
    • details of publications issued
    • recommendations issued in 2024 and an update on their status
    • updates on open recommendations made in previous years
    • marine accident statistics

    Read more in our Annual Report 2024.

    Media enquiries (telephone only)

    Media enquiries during office hours 01932 440015

    Media enquiries out of hours 0300 7777878

    Updates to this page

    Published 17 July 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: AAIB Report: Grob G109B, G-CHYB

    Source: United Kingdom – Government Statements

    News story

    AAIB Report: Grob G109B, G-CHYB

    Grob G109B (G-CHYB), aircraft pitched down from final approach and struck trees before coming to rest on the A419 near Aston Down Airfield, Gloucestershire, 27 August 2024

    Grob 109B

    The aircraft was on the late stage of final approach to Aston Down Airfield when it pitched down rapidly. The aircraft struck trees and then came to rest on the A419. Both those on board were injured and taken to hospital by the emergency services. The aircraft was severely damaged and the A419 was closed for several hours. The passenger, an experienced glider pilot, was flying the approach. The passenger’s gliding experience meant that they would normally fly the approach with their right hand on the control column and their left hand controlling the rate of descent using the airbrake handle. Flying the Grob 109 from the right seat, this control arrangement was reversed. When attempting to reduce the rate of descent, the passenger inadvertently pushed forward on the control column which caused a rapid increase in the rate of descent which could not be corrected before the aircraft struck the ground.

    Read the report

    Updates to this page

    Published 17 July 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: AAIB Report: Guimbal Cabri G2, G-FICH

    Source: United Kingdom – Government Statements

    News story

    AAIB Report: Guimbal Cabri G2, G-FICH

    Guimbal Cabri G2 (G-FICH), uncontrolled yaw resulting in ground contact, Leicester Airport, Leicestershire, 27 September 2024

    Accident site

    During a period of hovering at the end of an instructional flight, the helicopter began to yaw to the left. This yaw rapidly accelerated and G-FICH completed four rotations before striking the ground. Whilst the commander reported no injuries after the accident, he died seven days later from an unrelated medical condition.

    The helicopter examination did not reveal any technical faults that could have caused or contributed to the accident. Evidence from the manufacturer and operator demonstrated that applying and maintaining full opposite pedal will stop rotation in the situation encountered on the accident flight. It is likely that full pedal was not applied and/or not held long enough to effect a recovery.

    The helicopter was equipped with adjustable pedals on the right side but not on the left where the commander was sat. The manufacturer has taken safety action to install adjustable pedals in the left seat of all new models of the Cabri G2 as well as to add a pre-flight check of the travel of the fenestron.

    Read the report

    Updates to this page

    Published 17 July 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Civil Society Covenant: Government Outcomes Lab

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    Case study

    Civil Society Covenant: Government Outcomes Lab

    Data sharing and partnership working.

    The Government Outcomes Lab (GO Lab) is a research and policy centre at the Blavatnik School of Government, University of Oxford, established through a partnership with the UK Government. The mission of the GO Lab is to enable government to partner more effectively with the private and social sectors to improve people’s lives. The GO Lab offers a collaborative hub to enhance government learning from outcomes-based commissioning through world-class research, data curation and sharing, and responsive policy engagement.

    Data-led decision making

    Through initiatives such as INDIGO (International Network for Data on Impact and Government Outcomes) GO Lab’s work illustrates how data-led decision making can support effective working relationships across sectors. INDIGO is a global data collaborative that openly and transparently shares data about outcomes-focused partnerships. The INDIGO initiative includes the maintenance of a community of practitioners, a system for sharing data and open-access datasets designed to serve as public goods, such as a comprehensive dataset on social outcomes partnerships, and outcomes achieved by the Life Chances Fund projects.

    Key learnings

    Open data sharing between civil society and public bodies creates a shared evidence base and improves mutual understanding, while empowering civil society and other stakeholders to better understand and engage with government initiatives.

    Updates to this page

    Published 17 July 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Civil Society Covenant: AllChild and Better Society Capital

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    Case study

    Civil Society Covenant: AllChild and Better Society Capital

    Flexible commissioning for impactful early action.

    AllChild is a charity created to harness community resources to work with schools, local authorities, philanthropists, government and the voluntary and community sector to improve life chances for the 20% of children most at risk of poor outcomes. The programme is an intensive two year package of support tailored to each child’s unique strengths, needs and aspirations.

    Funding model

    In terms of its funding model, AllChild is supported by outcomes-based commissioning, which sees social investors such as Better Society Capital channel money through fund managers to provide working capital for the organisation. The commissioner, in this case local government, only pays out once target outcomes are achieved, such as improved wellbeing for children. This funding model reduces the financial risk on public bodies, thereby encouraging investment in innovative and flexible programmes. 

    Outcomes

    Outcomes-based contracts provide flexibility and sustainability for social sector organisations, enabling them to create partnerships with stakeholders including the local public sector, philanthropists and investors, while delivering tailored, impactful services.

    Updates to this page

    Published 17 July 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Civil Society Covenant: Greater London Authority

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    Case study

    Civil Society Covenant: Greater London Authority

    Increasing trust with civil society and communities during and after COVID.

    During response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Greater London Authority (GLA) worked collaboratively with London’s civil society, hosting online roundtables, public health briefings, and Big Conversation events. Working with health partners, these forums played a vital role in supporting testing and vaccine uptake, building trust, and sharing accurate and culturally competent information. 

    London Legacy Health Equity Partnership

    Following the pandemic, there was a determination to take the learnings from this collaboration, further embedding these approaches within vaccine programmes and work tackling health inequalities. This happened predominantly through the London Legacy Health Equity Partnership. During this time, there was a continuation of co-convened public health, GLA and NHS information briefings, covering issues like winter preparedness and mental health. 

    London Communities Emergencies Partnership

    The GLA has further strengthened relationships with community and faith partners within their approach to resilience, including through co-producing the London Communities Emergencies Partnership (LCEP), a civil society-led approach to coordinating emergency preparedness and response. LCEP sits on the London Resilience Forum, alongside emergency services and other public agencies, bringing the value of community voice and insight into London’s emergency response. This has helped build trust between agencies and collaboration with civil society in response to incidents. 

    Key learnings

    Working collaboratively with civil society before, during and after emergencies can strengthen resilience and, in the case of the pandemic, improve health outcomes like vaccine uptake.  Community-led models can increase trust in public services, and ensure government’s messaging and approach is culturally competent. Furthermore, through recognising the value of civil society organisations in its reach into local communities, the GLA has been able to effectively work with the sector to tackle shared challenges.

    Updates to this page

    Published 17 July 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Civil Society Covenant: Greater Manchester (GM) VCFSE Accord

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    Case study

    Civil Society Covenant: Greater Manchester (GM) VCFSE Accord

    Recognising the potential of civil society to address inequalities in the city-region.

    The Greater Manchester (GM) VCFSE (Voluntary, Community, Faith and Social Enterprise) Accord was signed in November 2017 as a collaboration agreement between public bodies and civil society.

    The Accord was established by the Greater Manchester Combined Authority and the Greater Manchester Health and Social Care Partnership with a group of GM-based civil society leaders to build a relationship that would recognise and unlock the full potential of civil society to address inequalities in the city-region for the public’s benefit. 

    A spotlight on civil society

    The Accord has helped raise the profile of civil society organisations with local public sector leaders and put a spotlight on the value and expertise that they can bring. One resulting partnership is the Greater Manchester Violence Reduction Unit (GMVRU) between government, police, health, education, youth justice services, local authorities, other statutory agencies and civil society. The GMVRU is committed to taking a community-led approach in its efforts to prevent violence. This approach acknowledges the value and strength of civil society organisations in working closely with communities, to understand their needs, challenges and strengths in relation to violence prevention. It also places decision-making in the hands of communities, including setting priorities and agreeing funding for projects and interventions aimed at engaging children, young people and families.

    StreetDoctors

    VRU Initiatives have included a civil society led StreetDoctors programme which delivers training sessions for young people to act in a medical emergency. This resulted in 95% of young people knowing what to do if someone is bleeding or unconscious, and 85% being willing to act in a medical emergency.

    Enhancing the Accord’s visibility

    An Interim Report suggests enhancing the Accord’s visibility and embedding its principles across public sector organisations. This will enhance recognition of civil society’s value across GM, thereby supporting increased involvement of VCSEs and increasing citizens’ voices in GM wide work.

    Updates to this page

    Published 17 July 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Civil Society Covenant: Transforming the NHS

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    Case study

    Civil Society Covenant: Transforming the NHS

    Collaboration shaping people’s health for the future.

    Through open dialogue and partnerships with civil society, the UK government’s Health Mission is building a National Health Service (NHS) in England fit for the future.

    The Department of Health and Social Care put in place a comprehensive engagement strategy to inform the development of the 10 Year Health Plan, which translates the thousands of insights gathered into a clear plan of action. Civil society can play a vital role in supporting the three fundamental shifts: from hospital to community, analogue to digital and treatment to prevention.

    The 10 Year Health Plan includes an explicit goal to make the NHS the best possible partner and the world’s most collaborative public healthcare provider. Bottom-up and grass roots innovation is how we’ll maximise progress. Alongside setting strategy, the Plan will have an explicit goal to harness partnerships with investors, industry, local government, employers, SMEs, voluntary organisations and trade unions. Deepening the relationship with civil society partners will help deliver the 10 Year Health Plan’s aims, including by fostering a ‘neighbourhood health service’ model.

    The ambition is to use a plurality of providers – from within the NHS, the voluntary sector, the independent sector and social enterprise. Where there is such rapid innovation taking place today in how services can be transformed through advances in science and technology, the government wants to broaden the eco-system of providers. For example, there is enormous potential for a wide range of providers to offer real value in the Neighbourhood Health Service. Our aim is to establish a neighbourhood health centre in every community, a one-stop-shop for patient care and the place from which multi-disciplinary teams operate. Neighbourhood health centres will co-locate NHS, local authority and voluntary sector services, to help create an offer that meets population needs holistically.

    Updates to this page

    Published 17 July 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: RSH highlights the importance of landlords understanding tenants’ homes

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    Press release

    RSH highlights the importance of landlords understanding tenants’ homes

    RSH’s standards require landlords to have a strong understanding of stock condition.

    A new report from the Regulator of Social Housing (RSH) sets out the importance of social landlords understanding the condition of tenants’ homes. The report concludes that this is essential for keeping tenants safe and underpins effective long-term investment planning.  

    RSH’s standards require landlords to have a strong understanding of stock condition. Through its regulatory activity, including inspections, RSH has found that landlords who demonstrated a stronger approach had some or all of the following features:  

    • Having up to date stock condition survey coverage of their homes, which they use to respond quickly to rectify hazards and Decent Homes Standard failures. 

    • Using stock condition data to build a strategic approach to investment and provide better value for money, by proactively addressing potential issues through planned major repairs, rather than fixing issues responsively. 

    • Demonstrating effective data management processes, by triangulating data from a range of sources to inform long-term financial planning and stress test business plans.    

    • Having effective governance processes and oversight, with clear reporting to boards or councillors.  

    • Using suitably skilled and accredited surveyors to carry out the work.  

    Almost all the C3 and C4 judgements that RSH has published since April 2024 related at least in part to the landlord failing to meet the Safety and Quality standard. In nearly three quarters of these cases, the issues included low stock condition survey coverage or a failure to demonstrate an understanding of tenants’ homes. Weaknesses in data quality has also been an important theme in governance downgrades, where some landlords have failed to use data to support key decisions including long-term investment planning. 

    Boards and councillors must ensure their organisation has an accurate, up-to-date and evidenced understanding of stock condition. This enables the provision of good quality homes and supports the strategic planning of major repairs programmes.  

    RSH will continue to use a range of regulatory tools to ensure landlords deliver the outcomes of its standards.  

    Kate Dodsworth, Chief of Regulatory Engagement at RSH, said:   

    Many social landlords are putting significant time and resources into understanding and improving the quality of tenants’ homes. This is a crucial requirement of our standards and underpins good governance, sound financial decision making, delivering value for money, and providing good quality homes and services for tenants.  

    Having a strong understanding of tenants’ homes enables landlords to provide more and better homes for people who need them. All landlords should read this report and use the findings to improve their approach.

    Most landlords continue to improve stock condition survey coverage. The average landlord reported surveying 75% of homes in the last five years (as of 31 March 2024), compared with 68% reported as of March 2023. 

    The vast majority (87%) of housing associations reported that they had undertaken a stock condition survey within 2023/24. These landlords reported physically inspecting over half a million homes in their most recent survey – equivalent to 20% of the total homes they own. 

    Notes to Editors

    1. In April 2024 RSH introduced new consumer standards for all social landlords, as well as a programme of inspections for large landlords (those with 1,000 homes or more).  

    2. RSH gathers a range of information from landlords beyond its inspections. This includes the annual Statistical Data Return (which requires landlords to report on stock condition survey coverage and homes that do not meet the Decent Homes Standard). Landlords are also required to produce and publish Tenant Satisfaction Measures which include questions about stock quality.  

    3. All social landlords must deliver the requirements of the Safety and Quality Standard. This includes the following required outcomes:  

    • Registered providers must have an accurate, up to date and evidenced understanding of the condition of their homes that reliably informs their provision of good quality, well maintained and safe homes for tenants.   

    • Registered providers must ensure that tenants’ homes meet the standard set out in section five of the Government’s Decent Homes Guidance and continue to maintain their homes to at least this standard unless exempted by the regulator.  

    • Registered providers must have an accurate record at an individual property level of the condition of their homes, based on a physical assessment of all homes and keep this up to date.

    For general enquiries email enquiries@rsh.gov.uk. For media enquiries please see our Media Enquiries page.

    Updates to this page

    Published 17 July 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: New action to tackle unpaid internships as Government seeks to protect younger workers

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    Press release

    New action to tackle unpaid internships as Government seeks to protect younger workers

    Call for Evidence launched into unpaid internships as some employers fail to pay young workers despite ban.

    • Evidence will be collected to better protect younger workers from being exploited by illegal unpaid internships. 

    • Tackling this issue would put money back into the pockets of interns across the UK. 

    • This delivers on a commitment to stop employers flouting the rules around unpaid internships, ensuring fair career pathways are accessible to all, breaking down barriers to opportunity as part of the Plan for Change. 

    Younger workers will be protected from employers flouting the rules on the use exploitative unpaid internships, as government takes a step closer on delivering its manifesto commitment to ban the practice. 

    Today (Thursday 17 July) the government has launched its call for evidence on the issue. This forms part of the Make Work Pay agenda, the biggest upgrade to worker’s rights in a generation which will directly benefit over 15 million workers – half of all workers in the UK.  

    Internships offer young people invaluable experience as they build their careers. When these are unpaid or paid below the National Minimum Wage, barriers to equal opportunity are created based on where people live, how old they are, or their social background.  

    Unpaid internships are already largely banned under current law, when they are not part of an educational or training course. The government is committed to strengthening these protections by gathering more evidence on how unpaid internships affect young people, and how businesses use them to assess candidates.  

    Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds said: 

    Every young person deserves the chance to build their career through quality work experience, but good employers are still being undercut by those exploiting interns by illegally asking them to work for free. 

    Our Plan for Change seeks to break down barriers to opportunity, which is why we will strengthen protections for younger workers so that internships are accessible to everyone, ensuring they have the foundations to build a strong and successful career.

    Employment Rights Minister Justin Madders said:  

    Internships provide a strong platform from which to build a career, allowing young people to learn new skills and giving employers a pipeline of future talent to hire from to grow their business. 

    Employers should not be taking advantage of the opportunities on offer by not paying their interns. This move will help us crack down on those not following the rules, so that the next generation of interns are able to gain that crucial experience whilst earning a fair wage.

    Nick Harrison, CEO of the Sutton Trust, said:

    Taking action on internships with low or no pay is absolutely the right thing to do. We’ve found that 61% of internships undertaken by recent graduates were ‘unpaid or underpaid’, effectively excluding those who can’t rely on financial support from family.  

    Employers will benefit from the wider pool of talent available to them, and three quarters of employers told us a ban wouldn’t impact the number of opportunities they provide. Today’s announcement marks a significant step in the right direction.

    The Call for Evidence will run for [12 weeks, closing on 9 October 2025]. 

    NOTES TO EDITORS: 

    • The Sutton Trust’s report, Unpaid and underpaid internships, was published on 23rd January 2025.  

    • The Sutton Trust surveyed 1,232 recent graduates (aged between 21 and 29) were surveyed between 10 and 11 December 2024 via Public First. 623 recent graduates reported completing at least one internship. All results are weighted using Iterative Proportional Fitting, or ‘Raking’. The results are weighted by age, gender and region to census data proportions. 

    • For the Sutton Trust’s report, employers were surveyed with a sample of 1,009 senior HR decision makers at businesses across Great Britain. Fieldwork was conducted online, between 10 and 18 December 2024, via YouGov, with quotas set by business size targeting 50% in small (10 to 49 employees), 25% in medium (50 to 249 employees) and 25% in large (250+ employees) businesses, to give statistically robust data.

    Updates to this page

    Published 17 July 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Civil Society Covenant: EUSS Vulnerability Programme

    Source: United Kingdom – Government Statements

    Case study

    Civil Society Covenant: EUSS Vulnerability Programme

    Leveraging data and transparency to bridge digital divides for vulnerable citizens.

    The EU Settlement Scheme’s (EUSS) digital-first design posed challenges for vulnerable EU citizens in the UK, including those facing language barriers, digital exclusion, mental health issues and homelessness. These issues posed a barrier to applying and securing settled status in the UK. Although many civil society organisations (CSOs) were uniquely placed to reach and support these individuals, they lacked accurate data to work with.

    Better data sharing

    In response, government launched a grant programme for CSOs to enhance data collection, sharing and transparency. This enabled better data sharing between the government and grantees for immediate assessments, established transparency standards, and offered support to smaller organisations for data management compliance. Data gathered from civil society informed policy changes and outreach, improving understanding of needs and enabling collaborative, evidence-based solutions. 

    Providing essential assistance

    Over £32.5 million was successfully allocated to over 70 civil society organisations, enabling them to provide essential assistance to more than 500,000 vulnerable citizens who might not have applied to the scheme otherwise. This critical initiative supported individuals with understanding the scheme, completing applications, and accessing legal or translation services.

    The grants also supported four national organisations (one each in England, Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland) and a number of regional organisations, ensuring UK-wide access to services. An example includes Citizens Advice Scotland, with 1,000 advisers in 200 outreach locations, delivering EU Settlement Scheme (EUSS) advice, including benefits, housing, and debt support, enhancing community wellbeing.

    Next steps

    Next steps include applying this model to future schemes and tracking long term impacts on community resilience.

    Updates to this page

    Published 17 July 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Civil Society Covenant: Accessible aviation with AATFG

    Source: United Kingdom – Government Statements

    Case study

    Civil Society Covenant: Accessible aviation with AATFG

    Co-designing accessible aviation through partnership.

    Established in November 2024 and chaired by Baroness Tanni Grey-Thompson, the Aviation Accessibility Task and Finish Group (AATFG) united industry, the regulator, and consumer advocates. This Department for Transport-facilitated group aimed to co-design practical improvements for disabled and less mobile air travellers.

    The initiative emphasises inclusive collaboration, actively engaging civil society, disability charities, and individuals with lived experience through roundtables, direct feedback, and deep dives. This approach directly contributes to Labour’s manifesto commitment to championing the rights of disabled people and to the principle of working with them, ensuring their views and voices are at the heart of all policy and action. The emphasis was on practical changes and ongoing dialogue with disabled passengers to ensure meaningful, sustainable improvements.

    This inclusive approach has positively influenced government-civil society relations. Actively involving disability advocacy groups and individuals, has enabled a collaborative and inclusive process. This aims to build trust and mutual understanding, where disabled citizens’ concerns are heard.

    Notable achievements included establishing direct engagement with disabled individuals and charities, fostering a collaborative policy approach, and setting a precedent for meaningfully including marginalised groups in policies that directly affect them.

    Updates to this page

    Published 17 July 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Civil Society Covenant: Medrwn Môn Place Shaping

    Source: United Kingdom – Government Statements

    Case study

    Civil Society Covenant: Medrwn Môn Place Shaping

    Working together as an alliance.

    Medrwn Môn’s Place Shaping empowers Anglesey communities through community alliances to actively shape local services. Previously, traditional top-down service provision often overlooked unique community needs. This created a barrier to citizen participation, with citizens often feeling disengaged from the decisions that affected them.

    Medrwn Môn’s Place Shaping was developed with Anglesey County Council to help find a solution. Supported by funding from the Welsh Government and using the principles of Wales’ Third Sector Scheme, the programme set up Community Alliances which create a map of community assets in their area, including physical facilities and the availability of local skills and experiences. They would then work with statutory services to develop services based on local assets and needs.

    The benefits of Place Shaping have included an increase in attendance of community groups, use of community buildings, and more opportunities for volunteering. The Môn Community Link, a social prescribing programme for residents, has become the single point of access for early intervention and prevention services for statutory providers including the community mental health team, housing support providers, GPs, and the local police.

    One of the Community Alliances, the Seiriol Alliance, is now a Charitable Incorporated Organisation employing its own staff, running its own community transport scheme and is generating its own money for small-scale community-led projects. This has improved government and civil society relationships by facilitating greater trust and a culture of shared responsibility.

    Services, which are both devolved and reserved, have become more relevant and accessible, building stronger community resilience through active participation. Public sector partners remain committed to meaningful community planning, with Place Shaping now directly written into Anglesey Council executive job descriptions and duties and a commitment to ensure all council departments are aware of their responsibilities to sustain this way of working.

    Updates to this page

    Published 17 July 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Civil Society Covenant: National Youth Strategy

    Source: United Kingdom – Government Statements

    Case study

    Civil Society Covenant: National Youth Strategy

    Putting young people at the heart of policy development.

    Young people have been in the driving seat of co-producing a new National Youth Strategy since its announcement in November 2024 by the DCMS Secretary of State as part of the government’s mission to improve opportunities. 

    As a first step, to ensure that youth voices would be at the heart of the process, the government appointed 13 diverse young people to form a Youth Advisory Group (YAG) and bring lived experience across key areas including advocacy, violence prevention, social mobility and mental health. An Expert Advisory Group of 14 experts from a variety of sectors sat alongside the YAG to bring expertise from relevant sectors, providing input and challenging thinking.

    DCMS partnered with an expert consortium – market research consultancy Savanta, My Life My Say and the #iwill Movement with coordination from Volunteering Matters and UK Youth – to set up a youth-led engagement campaign to ensure young people from all areas of the country had the opportunity to have their say. The consortium worked with ten Youth Collaborators to ensure all campaign activities were genuinely designed and led by young people. The “Deliver You” campaign used a range of innovative and targeted methods to ensure underrepresented groups were able to get their voices heard. The campaign captured insights from over 20,000 young people. 

    Outcomes

    Our approach has empowered young people to lead change at the heart of policy making and in their own lives. Their lived experiences including their worries and hopes for the future will form the basis of a new ten year ambition for young people in the National Youth Strategy.

    Updates to this page

    Published 17 July 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Civil Society Covenant: The Plan to Make Work Pay

    Source: United Kingdom – Government Statements

    Case study

    Civil Society Covenant: The Plan to Make Work Pay

    Early and inclusive collaboration with stakeholders.

    From the first day in office, the government set out its commitment to creating jobs that provide security, treat workers fairly, and pay a decent wage. To help achieve this, the government committed to continuing to work closely in partnership with business and trade unions at ministerial and official level. This tripartite working has been embedded within the delivery of the Plan to Make Work Pay and as part of the development of the government’s landmark Employment Rights Bill.

    This way of working has involved numerous engagement sessions to hear honest and diverse opinions from a range of perspectives and backgrounds. The expert and detailed insights and feedback gained from tripartite working has been invaluable in getting the detail right across the Plan to Make Work Pay and the Employment Rights Bill. From new rights on guaranteed hours, to sick pay, and to protection from unfair dismissal, trade union and business representatives have actively participated in informing policy development and will continue their involvement during the implementation. 

    This collaborative approach has ensured that the development of the Plan to Make Work Pay and the Employment Rights Bill have benefited from the practical expertise and perspectives of representatives of employers and employees. DBT’s Ministers and Employment Rights Directorate has engaged with over 190 stakeholders; ensuring the government is engaging broadly and deeply. The resulting policies will represent the biggest upgrade in workers’ rights in a generation.

    Key learnings

    Early and extensive collaboration with key stakeholders is crucial for developing effective and well-received employment legislation. This approach should be sustained throughout policy development. Embedding tripartite working fosters a more comprehensive understanding of the issues and helps to mitigate unintended consequences.

    Updates to this page

    Published 17 July 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Civil Society Covenant: Home Office Knife Crime Coalition

    Source: United Kingdom – Government Statements

    Case study

    Civil Society Covenant: Home Office Knife Crime Coalition

    A partnership based approach to reducing knife crime.

    Launched by the Prime Minister in September 2024, the Coalition to Tackle Knife Crime is a partnership of individuals with lived experience, civil society, and campaign groups, adopting a partnership approach with government to halve knife crime within a decade.

    The collaboration brings deep understanding of interventions that can help to prevent knife crime, bringing these perspectives into policy and programme creation to tackle the issue.

    The Home Office is also working with Coalition partners to provide a platform for youth voice and their perspectives on the core issues around knife crime, increasing public safety and supporting those who need it most, ensuring young people’s lived experiences contribute to shaping government policy.

    A key example of the Coalition working in partnership with government is the valuable contribution it made to inform the policy development and design of the extended surrender arrangements for knives, ninja swords and other weapons.   

    With Coalition member FazAmnesty and Words 4 Weapons, the government are delivering extended weapon surrender arrangements throughout July 2025. FazAmnesty is operating a mobile surrender van in Greater London, the West Midlands, and Greater Manchester, while Words 4 Weapons are providing anonymous surrender bins in these areas for knives and other weapons, including ninja swords. 

    These initiatives provide safe options for young people to surrender dangerous weapons, making our streets safer and removing more weapons from communities.

    Updates to this page

    Published 17 July 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom