Category: Politics

  • MIL-OSI China: New low-altitude economy research institute established in SW China

    Source: China State Council Information Office

    A new low-altitude economy research institute has been launched in Mianyang in southwest China’s Sichuan Province, marking a strategic move to drive the development of low-altitude industries in the country’s vast western region, according to China Low Altitude Economic Alliance.

    The China (Mianyang) Science and Technology City Low-Altitude Economy Research Institute was inaugurated on Sunday. It is jointly established by 14 entities, including Sichuan Jiuzhou Investment Holding Group Co., Ltd., Southwest University of Science and Technology, and leading commercial unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) company JOUAV. The institute aims to foster technological innovation and industry integration in this rapidly emerging sector.

    It brings together the strengths of government, industry, academia, research and application in Mianyang, a city known for its strong scientific and technological foundation.

    With its solid technological base, comprehensive industrial support and diverse application scenarios, Mianyang is poised to become a leading “city of low altitude” in western China, noted Luo Jun, executive director of the alliance.

    Speaking at the institute’s launch ceremony, Luo said that Mianyang will join the national low-altitude transportation network pilot program, which aims to integrate drones and air mobility systems into a unified traffic management framework.

    The institute’s establishment aligns with China’s broader strategy to advance the low-altitude economy, encompassing UAVs, urban air mobility, and other emerging sectors.

    In his keynote speech, Xiang Jinwu, an academician of the Chinese Academy of Engineering, described the low-altitude economy as an important engine for economic transformation and upgrading in the new era.

    Mianyang should leverage the institute as a platform to drive innovation, foster industrial clustering, and serve as a demonstration site for low-altitude economy applications.

    Moving forward, the institute will focus on key technological breakthroughs and the transformation of research outcomes while striving to become a leading hub for low-altitude economy innovation in western China and beyond. 

    MIL OSI China News

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Mexican Icon Frida Kahlo inspires exciting destination campaign

    Source: State of Victoria Local Government 2

    In celebration of the much-anticipated Frida Kahlo: In her own image exhibition opening at Bendigo Art Gallery on March 15, a vibrant Bendigo Fiesta marketing campaign has been launched with over 70 Mexican-inspired events and experiences for visitors and residents.

    Mayor Cr Andrea Metcalf said it was a huge scoop for Bendigo Art Gallery to have secured the exclusive Frida Kahlo exhibition.

    “This major exhibition has never been seen before in Australia, and only rarely shown internationally. It comes direct from Mexico’s Museo Frida Kahlo and features the iconic artist’s personal items including her fashion collection, make up, accessories, photographs, drawings and two celebrated paintings,” Cr Metcalf said.

    “This exhibition, complemented by the exciting Fiesta Bendigo campaign, is a fantastic opportunity for our region. Following on the from the success of previous destination campaigns, Fiesta Bendigo offers unique events, experiences and products to entice visitors to stay longer, shop, dine and spend, and explore other parts of our beautiful region while they are here. It puts Greater Bendigo on the map as a must-visit destination and that is a major boost to our local economy, supporting businesses and jobs.

    “Fiesta Bendigo celebrates all things Mexican with plenty of colour, dance, food, music and a great program line up. The program will be marketed throughout Victoria and interstate alongside the exhibition. I encourage you to take a look and join the Fiesta fun.”

    A tasty initiative is the launch of The Taco Trail running from March to July, involving over 20 local eateries who have risen to the challenge to serve up unique taco creations to savour, from meaty, vegan to sweet delights.

    Local residents and visitors can explore The Taco Trail and are encouraged to vote for their favourite taco from the selection on offer. By voting, you will automatically enter a draw to win a VIP weekend for two in Bendigo valued at over $1,000 (only Victorian residents). The finale will be a best taco competition in early June with professional culinary judges having the final say on the top taco in town. Hospitality businesses have also put together Mexican-inspired menus, tasting plates, mouth-watering desserts, Mexican cocktails and beverages.

    Hargreaves Mall will be transformed for a Fiesta Bendigo Street Party on Saturday May 3, 2025 to celebrate the music, food, culture, fashion and dance of Mexico. Fun free activities for the kids are also planned to include piñatas, facepainting and craft workshops. There will be stage performances from The Mexican Music Man, and the vibrant Mexbourne Dance Company. Until July, a wide range of Mexican-inspired events will be held in Hargreaves Mall offering free interactive family activities.

    Visitors and residents can also experience a wide range of cultural festivals and events, music, exhibitions, and themed events, including the Bendigo Latin Festival, the Dahlia Arts Festival, Mexican cooking classes and film screenings, flora headpiece workshops, make up sessions, and a mosaic show.

    Several Bendigo Tourism retailers have embraced the Fiesta theme with colourful displays and Mexican-inspired merchandise. You can bring the vibrant spirit of Fiesta Bendigo home with exclusive gastronomic merchandise and Mexican-inspired hampers available at Uniquely Bendigo, located inside the Bendigo Visitor Centre. There are also special accommodation packages for visitors.

    Perfect selfie spots in public spaces around the city centre capture the Bendigo Fiesta mood. The Bendigo letters at the piazza in Rosalind Park will be transformed on March 14 with the vibrant floral Fiesta Bendigo branding and the striking VIVA letters will also be installed near the Conservatory Gardens. Wrapped in bold, colourful artwork, the letters are inspired by Frida Kahlo’s iconic Viva La Vida painting.

    Bendigo Tramways will present La Música Tram which will host party evenings on the move, while the stationary Tram Café has been transformed into a floral Fiesta Tram.

    Chancery Lane features a vibrant street art mural El Callejón Azul created by artists Louise Davis, Tomi McManus and Wes Franklin. By temporarily renaming Chancery Lane ‘El Callejón Azul’ (The Blue Alley), the mural is inspired by the colours of Frida Kahlo’s home and includes plant life, animals and festive marigold garlands. The iconic red doors at the Engine Room on View Street are sporting a Mexican-inspired makeover with a stunning artwork from Dale Harris featuring a carnival performer.

    Bendigo Visitor Centre has a Fiesta façade and an interior wall featuring Fiesta Bendigo branding and bunting. Bendigo Railway Station has a vibrant new artwork, Love in Neon by Carly Wood, to create a welcoming space for commuters and visitors. The project was in partnership with the Department of Transport and Planning and V/Line.

    For the Fiesta program and to keep updated, head to:

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: President Lai attends ceremony marking 78th anniversary of 228 Incident

    Source: Republic of China Taiwan

    Details
    2024-12-10
    President Lai attends 2024 Asia Democracy and Human Rights Award ceremony
    On the morning of December 10, President Lai Ching-te presented the 2024 Asia Democracy and Human Rights Award to Bangladesh-based human rights organization Odhikar. In his remarks, President Lai recognized Odhikar’s dedication to promoting the human and political rights of the citizens of Bangladesh and courageously forging ahead in the pursuit of democracy and human rights. The president emphasized that defending democracy requires all the strength we can muster. He stated that the government of Taiwan will continue its efforts to strengthen Taiwan’s ability to defend democracy, and deepen partnerships with various countries to make global democracy more resilient. A translation of President Lai’s remarks follows: First, on behalf of the people of Taiwan, I want to offer sincere congratulations to Bangladesh-based human rights organization Odhikar, winner of the 2024 Asia Democracy and Human Rights Award. The Taiwan Foundation for Democracy (TFD) upholds that in Taiwan, human rights are a pillar of the nation. The TFD established the Asia Democracy and Human Rights Award in 2006, and thanks to the leadership of its successive chairmen and presidents, this award has now become one of Asia’s highest honors. And under the leadership of Chairman Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜), it will continue to strengthen Taiwan’s links with the world. This award recognizes individuals or groups that have promoted democracy and defended human rights in Asia, and also conveys the values that Taiwan upholds. Recipients of this award, just like Odhikar, have fought valiantly for freedom and human rights. Since its founding in 1994, Odhikar has been dedicated to promoting the human and political rights of the citizens of Bangladesh. The organization not only provides oversight and promotes accountability, but also publishes an annual human rights report that exposes neglected human rights abuses, so that unjust practices hidden in darkness can be brought to light. Members of Odhikar’s team have long faced severe difficulties while conducting human rights work, including harassment, imprisonment, and surveillance. Nevertheless, all have maintained an indomitable fighting spirit, courageously forging ahead in the pursuit of democracy and human rights, which is truly admirable. Taiwan, like Bangladesh, has experienced the suppression and coercion of authoritarian rule. But thanks to the dedication of many democracy activists and defenders of human rights, the people of Taiwan now enjoy a free and democratic way of life, and can use their ballots to determine the future of their own country. Taiwan is now a vibrant democratic society on the frontline of the defense of democracy. In recent years, disinformation and cognitive warfare have become challenges for all democracies. Through the Global Cooperation and Training Framework (GCTF), Taiwan has continuously expanded cooperation with various partner countries, exchanging experiences and strategies to counter disinformation. In September this year, for example, a GCTF overseas workshop was held in Lithuania for the first time, exploring how to deal with foreign information manipulation and interference during elections. Looking ahead, the government of Taiwan will continue its efforts to strengthen our ability to defend democracy, and deepen our partnerships with various countries to make global democracy more resilient. I also want to emphasize that defending democracy requires all the strength we can muster. So today, on Human Rights Day, I am honored to congratulate Odhikar in person, and thank you all for sharing your ideas and experiences with Taiwan’s society to forge an even greater force for progress. I look forward to a world with more civil society organizations like Odhikar to strengthen the bulwarks of freedom and human rights, and I firmly believe that into the future, your courageous convictions will be carried forward here in Taiwan. Let’s continue our efforts. Members of the foreign diplomatic corps stationed in Taiwan were also in attendance at the event.

    Details
    2024-05-10
    President Tsai attends 2024 Human Rights Press Awards ceremony
    On the evening of May 10, President Tsai Ing-wen attended the 2024 Human Rights Press Awards ceremony. In her remarks, President Tsai thanked the media for reporting on and bringing awareness to many important human rights issues. The president stated that Taiwan remains committed to advancing human rights. In 2019, she said, Taiwan became the first Asian country to legalize same-sex marriage, and in the following year, we established the National Human Rights Commission to better monitor and secure human rights protections at home. The president also stated that in 2022, Taiwan rolled out our first National Human Rights Action Plan, and in February, the Executive Yuan passed the UN International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance, marking another major milestone for Taiwan’s human rights development, achieved by our people and government working together. President Tsai stated that Taiwan now is rated as one of the freest countries when it comes to press freedom, and is an important hub for international media. This growing presence of international journalists, she said, is evidence that Taiwan is a country where transparency, freedom of expression, and easy access to information are ensured. The president said she is looking forward to Taiwan continuing to be the home for free press in Asia, and that Taiwan will continue to stand up for democracy, freedom, and human rights, and endeavor to build a world where all can live in dignity. A transcript of President Tsai’s remarks follows: It is my pleasure to join you all today at this important awards ceremony to congratulate the recipients of the Human Rights Press Awards. I am also happy about the fact that this event is being held in Taiwan for the very first time.  Your presence here is testament to Taiwan’s hard work on safeguarding media freedom and human rights. This event is also a demonstration to the world just how deeply Taiwan values these important pillars of democracy. I would like to thank the organizers of this event: Human Rights Watch, the Walter Cronkite School of Journalism and Mass Communication at Arizona State University, the foreign correspondents’ clubs of Taiwan and Thailand, and the Reynolds Center for Business Journalism. I applaud you for taking up this important mission of maintaining this award at a time when journalists are under unprecedented pressure and repression in carrying out their duties.  Tonight, I want to congratulate the recipients of the Human Rights Press Awards.  Congratulations to you all, and thank you for reporting on, and bringing awareness to many important human rights issues.  This includes the persecution of religious minorities in Myanmar, the rising number of suicides among Afghan women living under Taliban rule, and the Chinese government’s treatment of White Paper protesters, who stood up against COVID-19 lockdowns.  In an era of rising authoritarianism, with an increasing number of autocratic leaders and disinformation campaigns, your role as journalists in exposing the truth is more critical than ever. And through a variety of forms, such as writing, photography, video, audio, and multimedia, your courage and effort not only inspire us. You also help raise awareness in the international community, and prompt us to take action to tackle these pressing human rights issues. More importantly, by exposing injustices, you give hope to those whose stories that you told.  In Taiwan, we experienced the injustices of authoritarian rule, under nearly four decades of martial law. Some even sacrificed their lives for media freedom. Through our hard work, Taiwan now is rated as one of the freest countries when it comes to press freedom. In Freedom House’s report on Freedom in the World this year, Taiwan scored 94 out of 100. Under the Civil Liberties category, Taiwan received a perfect score for Freedom of Expression and Belief. Our news media is described as “generally free, reflecting a diversity of views and reporting aggressively on government policies.” Of course, in a critical way. According to the Economist Intelligence Unit’s Democracy Index 2023, Taiwan ranked 10th in the world and first in Asia, and was one of only 24 countries in the world evaluated as a “full democracy.” And, in this year’s World Press Freedom Index by Reporters Without Borders, Taiwan ranked 27th in the world, rising eight spots from last year. Despite these achievements, in recent years, there have been authoritarian forces targeting the freedom we have worked so hard to achieve. We found that there are constant attempts from authoritarian forces to influence our media environment. There are also well-funded, large-scale disinformation campaigns making extensive use of internal and external propaganda to influence Taiwan’s democracy. The freedoms enjoyed by Taiwanese citizens on the internet, media, and social media are now being utilized to erode Taiwan’s democracy.  Eleven years in a row, Taiwan has exceeded every other country in the world, on the amount of false information disseminated within its borders by other governments, according to the research by V-Dem. There are several goals of such campaigns. They want to further polarize our society, pitting citizens against one another. They also want to erode trust in democratic institutions and government officials. They aggressively promote the narrative that democracy is chaotic and inefficient. Such disinformation campaigns have become one of the most difficult challenges for democracies like Taiwan. Moreover, the rise of AI has benefited all of us. On the other hand, this rise has also allowed disinformation to be generated and distributed at an unprecedented rate. This makes deterring it much more difficult. This also makes defending our right to know the facts all the more important.  A democracy has limited means to deal with disinformation campaigns. This is out of the concern of causing harm to freedom of speech, if measures are taken to limit, restrict, or control the free flow of information. In Taiwan, in order to counter disinformation campaigns, we encourage all parts of our society to act together. As timeliness and transparency are keys to an effective defense against disinformation, the Taiwanese government holds news briefings and releases real-time official clarifications on a regular basis. Taiwan’s vibrant civil society also contributes quite a lot to combat disinformation. Some publish thoroughly researched and detailed reports on disinformation campaigns. They also identify playbooks on authoritarian information manipulation. This is accompanied by media literacy lesson plans and offering education to citizens. The civil tech community has also developed chatbots for chat applications to make fact-checking much easier.  Other than countering information warfare from authoritarian regimes, Taiwan remains committed to advancing human rights. In 2019, we became the first Asian country to legalize same-sex marriage. The following year, we established the National Human Rights Commission to better monitor and secure human rights protections at home. And in 2022, we rolled out our first National Human Rights Action Plan, with the aim of continually improving human rights standards. Although Taiwan is not a member of the United Nations (UN), we have voluntarily incorporated six international covenants on human rights into domestic law, and issued national reports on their implementation.  In February, the Executive Yuan passed the UN International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance. This marked another major milestone for Taiwan’s human rights development, achieved by our people and government working together. As the result of our work on safeguarding freedom, Taiwan is now an important hub for international media. In recent years, we have received increasing numbers of resident correspondents and visiting journalists from international media agencies. As of last month, Taiwan is home to 176 correspondents from 86 media outlets originating in 22 countries – this is roughly double the figure from 2016. This growing presence of international journalists is evidence that Taiwan is a country where transparency, freedom of expression, and easy access to information are ensured. I am proud and looking forward to Taiwan continuing to be the home for free press in Asia. Despite the new and growing challenges in the region, Taiwan will continue to stand up for democracy, freedom, and human rights. Now more than ever, it is essential that we unite and support one another, as we address these challenges together and endeavor to build a world where all can live in dignity. I want to close by thanking you all again for joining me to honor the recipients of the Human Rights Press Awards. At a time when many journalists in Asia and from around the world must put their safety at risk for doing their job, you have our utmost respect for your professionalism and courage. Once again, congratulations to all the award-winners. Also in attendance at the event were European Economic and Trade Office Head Filip Grzegorzewski and British Office Taipei Representative John Dennis.

    Details
    2024-04-17
    President Tsai delivers remarks at International Holocaust Remembrance Day event
    On the afternoon of April 17, President Tsai Ing-wen attended an International Holocaust Remembrance Day event and delivered remarks, in which she said that unity is imperative in combating hatred and developing understanding. The president stated that as we are confronted with the growing threats of terrorism and authoritarianism, Taiwan has been taking initiatives, through collaboration with our international partners, to enhance regional religious freedom, to fight against discrimination, and to promote equality. She stated that Taiwan will continue to be a strong advocate for human rights and democracy, so we can leave the world a better place for future generations. Upon arrival, President Tsai took in a musical performance and watched as a rabbi recited a prayer before joining other distinguished guests to light candles in memory of the Holocaust’s victims. A transcript of President Tsai’s remarks follows: I would like to begin by thanking the Israel Economic and Cultural Office (ISECO) in Taipei, the German Institute Taipei, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and the Taiwan Foundation for Democracy for co-organizing this important event. I also want to thank you all for making time to come here today to remember those who lost their lives in the Holocaust. We are also here to pay tribute to those who survived, and to acknowledge the sufferings of all who were affected by this dark chapter of human history.  I also want to take a moment to acknowledge Mr. Peter Gaspar, who is joining us virtually today. I am grateful for his participation in this year’s event and for sharing his harrowing experience with all of us. Every year, we come here together to remember those who perished in the Holocaust, as well as those who endured unimaginable sufferings because of this tragedy. We must pledge to never forget this period in history, when human dignity was cast aside for political ideology. We should also never stop fighting against discrimination and bigotry. We must also be reminded that there are still countless people who continue to suffer at the hands of authoritarian regimes and dictatorships, just because they are of different ethnic origin, gender, sexual orientation, religion, or political ideology. In other words, there is still much work needed to be done. In the pursuit of justice and truth, we can learn from Israel and Germany – Israel in its efforts to preserve the historical accounts of the Holocaust, especially its victims, and Germany in its courage to face the past.  In Taiwan, we have been working to ensure that we address the injustices of the past and uncover the truth of atrocities in the authoritarian era. In addition to the annual commemoration of the 228 Incident, my government has built a solid foundation for the realization of transitional justice. We elevated transitional justice as a priority at the highest government level. The Executive Yuan established government bodies to further emphasize the values of transitional justice in policy implementation. The newly amended Political Archives Act came into effect this year, on the 77th anniversary of the 228 Incident. This is an important element in my government’s effort to restore truth in the pursuit of transitional justice. We hope this will further help bring some closure and comfort to the victims of the White Terror era and their families. Even though we have come quite a long way on upholding human rights and fighting against bigotry, the world must continue to confront antisemitism and authoritarian aggression. We are also seeing the horrifying effects of such aggressions in Ukraine and in Hamas’ terroristic attack on Israel. This is why we stress the importance of working alongside the international community to safeguard what we fought so hard to achieve, that is, democracy, freedom, equality, and peace. As part of our collaborative efforts, starting from 2021, the Israel office here, our Ministry of Education’s human rights resource center, and Yad Vashem, Israel’s World Holocaust Remembrance Center, co-organized workshops and held traveling exhibitions to raise awareness on the history of the Holocaust. We also continue to donate to Yad Ezer Lechaver, an NGO that works with our representative office in Tel Aviv, to help provide daily necessities to Holocaust survivors. Through collaboration with our international partners, Taiwan has been proactively taking initiatives to enhance regional religious freedom, to fight against discrimination, and to promote equality. Taiwan will continue to be a strong advocate for human rights and democracy. History has taught us time and again that unity is imperative in combating hatred and developing understanding. As we are confronted with the growing threats of terrorism and authoritarianism, it is even more important that we work together, so we can leave the world a better place for future generations. We owe it to the memory of those who lost their precious lives to a tragedy like the Holocaust and those who sacrificed themselves to protect the value of democracy. We should also remind ourselves to remain vigilant, while we reaffirm our vow to not let this tragedy happen again. In closing, I want to thank everyone for taking part in this meaningful event, and for keeping the names and stories of the victims of the Holocaust living in our memory. Also in attendance at the event were Chair of the Knesset Taiwan friendship group Boaz Toporovsky, ISECO Representative Maya Yaron, and German Institute Taipei Director General Jörg Polster.

    Details
    2024-02-28
    President Tsai attends ceremony marking 77th anniversary of 228 Incident
    On the morning of February 28, in Chiayi County, President Tsai Ing-wen attended the nation’s main memorial ceremony marking the 77th anniversary of the 228 Incident. The president offered a floral wreath in memory of the victims, and stated that over the past eight years the government has worked systematically to advance work in transitional justice, pointing out that it has completed four fact-finding investigation reports to restore historical truths and has helped victims to restore their reputations and receive compensation. She said that nearly 2,000 applications for compensation have been accepted for processing, and the government has already paid out a total of more than NT$4 billion in compensation. The government’s effort last year to pass an amendment to the Political Archives Act saw support from both the ruling and opposition parties, she said, and that amendment enters into force today. The president emphasized that transitional justice is not intended to be directed at any particular political party. Rather, she said, it is that the government in a democratic system must take responsibility for illegal acts committed by the state during an earlier period of authoritarian rule and make amends for past harms. She said that honestly facing up to our history is the only way Taiwan’s democratic institutions can become more deeply rooted and continue to evolve. Emphasizing that there is no shortcut to transitional justice, and that scars in the memory do not easily fade, the president said that our generation must take concrete action to find ways to peacefully coexist with history and build an even more open society. She said that to face the past, we must not forget the past, much less fear to remember it; and to face the future, we must continue to deepen our discussions as we pursue a more democratic, sustainable social community. A translation of the president’s remarks follows: The February 28 Incident filled the people of Taiwan with a desire for democracy and freedom, but authoritarianism and heavy-handed rule stymied the seeds of democracy and ushered in the White Terror era. This difficult period of the past left a scar on Taiwan’s history. To help this scar to heal, we must first understand the nature of the wound. Until we honestly face facts and listen to one other, we cannot close our wounds and reach the genuine reconciliation that ends our history being a cause of division in Taiwan. Once we do this, the people of Taiwan will be better able to join together in defense of democracy and move forward together. Over the past eight years, we have worked systematically to advance work in transitional justice. In the area of legislative action, we began with reinforcing the foundation for transitional justice by amending the Act Governing the Settlement of Ill-gotten Properties by Political Parties and Their Affiliate Organizations, the Act on Promoting Transitional Justice, the Organizational Act of the National Human Rights Museum, the Political Archives Act, and the Act to Restore Victim’s Rights Infringed by Illegal Acts of the State During the Period of Authoritarian Rule. We have also established specialized organizations and mechanisms that form the engine moving our transitional justice project forward. Now that the Transitional Justice Commission has completed its mission, the Executive Yuan is coordinating the efforts of six central government agencies that have taken over the task of implementing transitional justice work. Building on this foundation, our government has completed four fact-finding investigation reports to restore historical truths, and we have amended legislation to improve the handling of political archives and ill-gotten assets in the possession of political parties. From the ill-gotten party assets that have been appropriated by the state, a special fund has been established to support public welfare and transitional justice-related work. We have also helped victims restore their reputations and receive compensation. Nearly 2,000 applications for compensation have been accepted for processing by the Restoration of Victim’s Rights Infringed by Illegal Acts of the State During the Period of Authoritarian Rule Foundation since it was established over a year ago. Last year, for the first time ever, our government returned property to a victim from whom it had been illegally confiscated by the state during the period of authoritarian rule. In total, the government has already paid out more than NT$4 billion in compensation. Transitional justice is not intended to be directed at any particular political party. Rather, it is that the government in a democratic system must take responsibility for illegal acts committed by the state during an earlier period of authoritarian rule and make amends for past harms. Honestly facing up to our history is the only way Taiwan’s democratic institutions can become more deeply rooted and continue to evolve. After years of hard work, the 228 Memorial Foundation has identified 2,340 victims of the 228 Incident, and has additionally identified more than 4,000 possible victims. In a short while, acting on behalf of the government, I will be awarding “certificates of restored reputation” to the family members of several victims of the 228 Incident. Two of these individuals had originally been classified as “possible victims,” but after historical archives were made available for public access it was confirmed that they had indeed been victims. Our experience in this case showed us that there remain more historical truths for the government to help bring to light. This is why the government saw support from both the ruling and opposition parties last year when it worked to pass an amendment to the Political Archives Act. That amendment did pass, and it enters into force today. Political archives provide many important pieces in the puzzle of our historical past, so I would like to ask our national security officials to adopt an open-minded attitude. I would like for them to declassify more political archives and make them publicly accessible to the greatest possible extent. Our transitional justice work encompasses truth, justice, reparation, memorialization, and, most importantly, guarantees of non-recurrence. These are the five internationally recognized pillars of transitional justice. We have also seen different sectors of Taiwanese society contribute to transitional justice, each in its own way. In Search of a Mixed Identity, a film about a victim of the 228 Incident, will premiere next month, and the Gongsheng Music Festival, which is held annually to commemorate the incident, marked its 12th year in 2024. I want to thank the many civil society organizations and young people who have worked so long and hard to further the cause of transitional justice. You have given of yourselves for the nation, providing fresh tinder to keep the torch of democracy alight and keep it glowing ever stronger. I must also thank the Executive Yuan, the Transitional Justice Commission, the Ill-Gotten Party Assets Settlement Committee, and the various central government agencies and civil society organizations that have accompanied us on this undertaking every step of the way. Together we have worked on behalf of those who suffered the indignities of the 228 Incident and the White Terror era so that they can put the darkness behind them. But I know full well that our efforts pale in comparison to what the victims and their family members have been through. There is no shortcut to transitional justice, and scars in the memory do not easily fade. Our generation must take concrete action to find ways to peacefully coexist with history and build an even more open society.  I have spoken with the Executive Yuan about the three points that Chiang Jung-sen (江榮森) just raised. As a matter of fact, these three points are related to issues the Executive Yuan is actively addressing right now, and I am confident that the Executive Yuan will come forward with public statements at the proper times. These matters are all part of the government’s work, and we will continue doing our best to address them. To face the past, we must not forget the past, much less fear to remember it. To face the future, we must continue to deepen our discussions as we pursue a more democratic, sustainable social community.

    Details
    2023-12-07
    President Tsai attends 2023 Asia Democracy and Human Rights Award ceremony
    On the morning of December 7, President Tsai Ing-wen presented the 2023 Asia Democracy and Human Rights Award to Amihan Abueva, regional executive director of the Child Rights Coalition Asia (CRC Asia). In remarks, President Tsai recognized Ms. Abueva’s long-term contributions to advocacy for the rights of children in her battle against all forms of child violence. The president pointed out that Taiwan has endeavored for nearly a decade now to incorporate international standards for the rights of the child into domestic law to ensure more protections for children’s rights. The president said that Taiwan will remain vigilant to protect our hard-earned democracy, freedom, and human rights, and by doing so, help further entrench the rights of the child here and globally. A transcript of President Tsai’s remarks follows: Today, I would like to begin by congratulating Ms. Amihan Abueva on receiving this year’s Asia Democracy and Human Rights Award, established by the Taiwan Foundation for Democracy. Ms. Abueva has been a powerful advocate for the rights of children in her decades-long battle against all forms of child violence, especially trafficking and sexual exploitation. Throughout her career, she has epitomized selflessness and courage, tirelessly fighting to secure a safer world for our children and our future. Whether in her former roles as executive secretary and president of ECPAT International [End Child Prostitution, Child Pornography and Trafficking of Children for Sexual Purposes], or in her current position as the regional executive director of the Child Rights Coalition of Asia, Ms. Abueva has pushed for more child participation, in society and in policy-making for child welfare. She has also contributed to the strengthening of the relevant legal framework at the national and international levels. As she once said, “Children’s rights are everybody’s business.” Ms. Abueva has also played an important role in government efforts by serving as Philippine representative to the ASEAN Commission on the Rights of Women and Children. And her leadership today at CRC Asia has helped connect child rights organizations throughout Asia, including our own Child Welfare League Foundation in Taiwan. The network she built has brought the public sector and private society together to work toward the improvement of children’s rights. While advocating her cause, Ms. Abueva has also devoted herself to awareness raising, through speeches and reading materials, helping both adults and children see the warning signs so that they can prevent trafficking from taking place. Throughout her storied career, her mission has remained the same: to protect children, their rights, and their future, by giving them a voice and making sure their stories are heard. Taiwan also strives to do its part to protect our children and their rights. As with most rights advocacy, we owe our thanks to our civil society in spearheading grassroots efforts and working in coordination with the government. And a crucial part of that is making sure we have sound legislation. For nearly a decade now, we have endeavored to incorporate international standards for the rights of the child into domestic law. In 2014 we passed legislation to bring the principles of the 1989 United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC), the most ratified human rights treaty in history, into our own legal framework. And to bring Taiwan more in compliance with the UNCRC, we hold discussions and reviews on our implementation efforts, which help us formulate future policy and further protect the rights of children. To date, we have submitted two national reports, each followed by a review meeting. To these, we invite international experts to discuss the state of children’s rights in Taiwan with our government agencies and NGOs. Most importantly, and as Ms. Abueva has long championed, children and the youth are represented in these meetings to ensure that they have a voice in the protection of their own rights. Aside from overarching legislation, we want to ensure that children’s rights are covered by relevant laws. Under these laws, Taiwan has not only addressed traditional forms of violence done to children, in both home and school environments; we have also taken a forward-looking approach to prevent novel forms of child violence. With the addition to our Criminal Code of a chapter on offense against sexual privacy this year, we aim to protect the sexual privacy of every individual in the digital age. And this is particularly beneficial for children and young people, a large and vulnerable demographic of Internet users. As proclaimed in the UNCRC, children are entitled to the very rights set forth in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. With this in mind, Taiwan will remain vigilant to protect our hard-earned democracy, freedom, and human rights, and by doing so, help further entrench the rights of the child here and globally. Once again, I extend my sincere congratulations to Ms. Abueva, and thank her for her selfless efforts. With the inspiration of such outstanding advocates as Ms. Abueva, I look forward to more people joining forces in the fight to protect the rights of the most vulnerable. Members of the foreign diplomatic corps in Taiwan were also in attendance at the event.

    Details
    2025-02-14
    President Lai holds press conference following high-level national security meeting
    On the morning of February 14, President Lai Ching-te convened the first high-level national security meeting of the year, following which he held a press conference. In remarks, President Lai announced that in this new year, the government will prioritize special budget allocations to ensure that Taiwan’s defense budget exceeds 3 percent of GDP. He stated that the government will also continue to reform national defense, reform our legal framework for national security, and advance our economic and trade strategy of being rooted in Taiwan while expanding globally. The president also proposed clear-cut national strategies for Taiwan-US relations, semiconductor industry development, and cross-strait relations. President Lai indicated that he instructed the national security and administrative teams to take swift action and deliver results, working within a stable strategic framework and according to the various policies and approaches outlined. He also instructed them to keep a close watch on changes in the international situation, seize opportunities whenever they arise, and address the concerns and hope of the citizens with concrete actions. He expressed hope that as long as citizens remain steadfast in their convictions, are willing to work hand in hand, stand firm amidst uncertainty, and look for ways to win within changing circumstances, Taiwan is certain to prevail in the test of time yet again. A translation of President Lai’s remarks follows: First, I would like to convey my condolences for the tragic incident which occurred at the Shin Kong Mitsukoshi department store in Taichung, which resulted in numerous casualties. I have instructed Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) to lead the relevant central government agencies in assisting Taichung’s municipal government with actively resolving various issues regarding the incident. It is my hope that these issues can be resolved efficiently. Earlier today, I convened this year’s first high-level national security meeting. I will now report on the discussions from the meeting to all citizens. 2025 is a year full of challenges, but also a year full of hope. In today’s global landscape, the democratic world faces common threats posed by the convergence of authoritarian regimes, while dumping and unfair competition from China undermine the global economic order. A new United States administration was formed at the beginning of the year, adopting all-new strategies and policies to address challenges both domestic and from overseas. Every nation worldwide, including ours, is facing a new phase of changes and challenges. In face of such changes, ensuring national security, ensuring Taiwan’s indispensability in global supply chains, and ensuring that our nation continues to make progress amidst challenges are our top priorities this year. They are also why we convened a high-level national security meeting today. At the meeting, the national security team, the administrative team led by Premier Cho, and I held an in-depth discussion based on the overall state of affairs at home and abroad and the strategies the teams had prepared in response. We summed up the following points as an overall strategy for the next stage of advancing national security and development. First, for overall national security, so that we can ensure the freedom, democracy, and human rights of the Taiwanese people, as well as the progress and development of the nation as we face various threats from authoritarian regimes, Taiwan must resolutely safeguard national sovereignty, strengthen self-sufficiency in national defense, and consolidate national defense. Taiwan must enhance economic resilience, maintain economic autonomy, and stand firm with other democracies as we deepen our strategic partnerships with like-minded countries. As I have said, “As authoritarianism consolidates, democratic nations must come closer in solidarity!” And so, in this new year, we will focus on the following three priorities: First, to demonstrate our resolve for national defense, we will continue to reform national defense, implement whole-of-society defense resilience, and prioritize special budget allocations to ensure that our defense budget exceeds 3 percent of GDP. Second, to counter the threats to our national security from China’s united front tactics, attempts at infiltration, and cognitive warfare, we will continue with the reform of our legal framework for national security and expand the national security framework to boost societal resilience and foster unity within. Third, to seize opportunities in the restructuring of global supply chains and realignment of the economic order, we will continue advancing our economic and trade strategy of being rooted in Taiwan while expanding globally, strengthening protections for high-tech, and collaborating with our friends and allies to build supply chains for global democracies. Everyone shares concern regarding Taiwan-US relations, semiconductor industry development, and cross-strait relations. For these issues, I am proposing clear-cut national strategies. First, I will touch on Taiwan-US relations. Taiwan and the US have shared ideals and values, and are staunch partners within the democratic, free community. We are very grateful to President Donald Trump’s administration for their continued support for Taiwan after taking office. We are especially grateful for the US and Japan’s joint leaders’ statement reiterating “the importance of maintaining peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait as an indispensable element of security and prosperity for the international community,” as well as their high level of concern regarding China’s threat to regional security. In fact, the Democratic Progressive Party government has worked very closely with President Trump ever since his first term in office, and has remained an international partner. The procurement of numerous key advanced arms, freedom of navigation critical for security and stability in the Taiwan Strait, and many assisted breakthroughs in international diplomacy were made possible during this time. Positioned in the first island chain and on the democratic world’s frontline countering authoritarianism, Taiwan is willing and will continue to work with the US at all levels as we pursue regional stability and prosperity, helping realize our vision of a free and open Indo-Pacific. Although changes in policy may occur these next few years, the mutual trust and close cooperation between Taiwan and Washington will steadfastly endure. On that, our citizens can rest assured. In accordance with the Taiwan Relations Act and the Six Assurances, the US announced a total of 48 military sales to Taiwan over the past eight years amounting to US$26.265 billion. During President Trump’s first term, 22 sales were announced totaling US$18.763 billion. This greatly supported Taiwan’s defensive capabilities. On the foundation of our close cooperation with the past eight years’ two US administrations, Taiwan will continue to demonstrate our determination for self-defense, accelerate the bolstering of our national defense, and keep enhancing the depth and breadth of Taiwan-US security cooperation, along with all manner of institutional cooperation. In terms of bilateral economic cooperation, Taiwan has always been one of the US’s most reliable trade partners, as well as one of the most important cooperative partners of US companies in the global semiconductor industry. In the past few years, Taiwan has greatly increased both direct and indirect investment in the US. By 2024, investment surpassed US$100 billion, creating nearly 400,000 job opportunities. In 2023 and 2024, investment in the US accounted for over 40 percent of Taiwan’s overall foreign investment, far surpassing our investment in China. In fact, in 2023 and 2024, Taiwanese investment in China fell to 11 percent and 8 percent, respectively. The US is now Taiwan’s biggest investment target. Our government is now launching relevant plans in accordance with national development needs and the need to establish secure supply systems, and the Executive Yuan is taking comprehensive inventory of opportunities for Taiwan-US economic and trade cooperation. Moving forward, close bilateral cooperation will allow us to expand US investment and procurement, facilitating balanced trade. Our government will also strengthen guidance and support for Taiwanese enterprises on increasing US investment, and promote the global expansion and growth of Taiwan’s industries. We will also boost Taiwan-US cooperation in tech development and manufacturing for AI and advanced semiconductors, and work together to maintain order in the semiconductor market, shaping a new era for our strategic economic partnership. Second, the development of our semiconductor industry. I want to emphasize that Taiwan, as one of the world’s most capable semiconductor manufacturing nations, is both willing and able to address new situations. With respect to President Trump’s concerns about our semiconductor industry, the government will act prudently, strengthen communications between Taiwan and the US, and promote greater mutual understanding. We will pay attention to the challenges arising from the situation and assist businesses in navigating them. In addition, we will introduce an initiative on semiconductor supply chain partnerships for global democracies. We are willing to collaborate with the US and our other democratic partners to develop more resilient and diversified semiconductor supply chains. Leveraging our strengths in cutting-edge semiconductors, we will form a global alliance for the AI chip industry and establish democratic supply chains for industries connected to high-end chips. Through international cooperation, we will open up an entirely new era of growth in the semiconductor industry. As we face the various new policies of the Trump administration, we will continue to uphold a spirit of mutual benefit, and we will continue to communicate and negotiate closely with the US government. This will help the new administration’s team to better understand how Taiwan is an indispensable partner in the process of rebuilding American manufacturing and consolidating its leadership in high-tech, and that Taiwan-US cooperation will benefit us both. Third, cross-strait relations. Regarding the regional and cross-strait situation, Taiwan-US relations, US-China relations, and interactions among Taiwan, the US, and China are a focus of global attention. As a member of the international democratic community and a responsible member of the region, Taiwan hopes to see Taiwan-US relations continue to strengthen and, alongside US-China relations, form a virtuous cycle rather than a zero-sum game where one side’s gain is another side’s loss. In facing China, Taiwan will always be a responsible actor. We will neither yield nor provoke. We will remain resilient and composed, maintaining our consistent position on cross-strait relations: Our determination to safeguard our national sovereignty and protect our free and democratic way of life remains unchanged. Our efforts to maintain peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait, as well as our willingness to work alongside China in the pursuit of peace and mutual prosperity across the strait, remain unchanged. Our commitment to promoting healthy and orderly exchanges across the strait, choosing dialogue over confrontation, and advancing well-being for the peoples on both sides of the strait, under the principles of parity and dignity, remains unchanged. Regarding the matters I reported to the public today, I have instructed our national security and administrative teams to take swift action and deliver results, working within a stable strategic framework and according to the various policies and approaches I just outlined. I have also instructed them to keep a close watch on changes in the international situation, seize opportunities whenever they arise, and address the concerns and hope of the citizens with concrete actions. My fellow citizens, over the past several years, Taiwan has weathered a global pandemic and faced global challenges, both political and economic, arising from the US-China trade war and Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. Through it all, Taiwan has persevered; we have continued to develop our economy, bolster our national strength, and raise our international profile while garnering more support – all unprecedented achievements. This is all because Taiwan’s fate has never been decided by the external environment, but by the unity of the Taiwanese people and the resolve to never give up. A one-of-a-kind global situation is creating new strategic opportunities for our one-of-a-kind Taiwanese people, bringing new hope. Taiwan’s foundation is solid; its strength is great. So as long as everyone remains steadfast in their convictions, is willing to work hand in hand, stands firm amidst uncertainty, and looks for ways to win within changing circumstances, Taiwan is certain to prevail in the test of our time yet again, for I am confident that there are no difficulties that Taiwan cannot overcome. Thank you.

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News

  • MIL-Evening Report: NSW has finally struck a school funding deal. What does this mean for schools and students?

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Stewart Riddle, Professor, School of Education, University of Southern Queensland

    The federal government and NSW government have announced a new funding deal for the state’s public schools.

    This will see the Commonwealth contribution jump from 20% to 25% of the schooling resource standard (on which school funding is based) by 2034. The NSW government will contribute the rest.

    This follows more than a year of negotiations between federal Labor and the states and territories to lock in a new agreement, after the previous one expired at the end of 2024. Queensland is now the only state or territory without an agreement.

    Th NSW deal will result in an additional A$4.8 billion in federal funding to NSW public schools over ten years. But the extra funding comes with conditions.

    As Prime Minister Anthony Albanese says,

    This is not a blank cheque; [it] ties funding to reforms that will help students catch up, keep up and finish school.

    Why has this taken so long?

    The first state to sign on was Western Australia in January last year, but many other states have taken longer to agree.

    Some, like NSW pushed for a 5% funding increase, when the Albanese government was initially only offering a 2.5% boost.

    The federal government finally agreed to a 5% increase for South Australia and Victoria in January, in a sign the school “funding wars” were about to see some peace.




    Read more:
    Schools agreement provides NSW $4.8 billion extra for public schools over a decade


    What’s in the new agreement?

    The new funding is part of the Better and and Fairer Schools Agreement. Under this agreement, states and territories must agree to specific education reforms to qualify for the federal funding. These include:

    • Year 1 phonics and early years numeracy checks

    • an emphasis on “explicit teaching” (where teachers show students what to do and how to do it)

    • providing intensive support for students

    • support for student and teacher wellbeing

    • improving teacher recruitment and retention.

    The specific actions required by each state and territory are outlined in their bilateral agreements with the federal government.

    The new money will take time to arrive

    The federal and NSW governments have billed their deal as a means to “fully and fairly fund New South Wales public schools”. Or, as Education Minister Jason Clare noted, “this is big”.

    But while the extra funding is welcome news for NSW public schools, the results of the agreed reforms will not be felt for some time. Underfunded schools will continue to be underfunded for years to come.

    This is because the extra funding will gradually kick in from 2026 to 2034. So many students who currently attend underfunded public schools will not see the benefits of the increased funding during their time at school.

    Keep in mind, talk of “fully funding” schools dates back to David Gonski’s 2011 report, which called for equitable funding for Australia’s education system.




    Read more:
    How a Cold War satellite and Robert Menzies changed the way Australian schools are funded


    What about the reforms?

    The federal government is placing considerable emphasis on its bid to lift wellbeing, teaching and learning standards as part of the new agreement. But the last agreement with states made little difference to schools.

    The National School Reform Agreement (which expired at the end of 2024) aimed to improved academic outcomes, especially for children from disadvantaged backgrounds and improve school attendance. But there were few positive gains around its goals.

    In 2022, a scathing Productivity Commission’s review of the agreement found:

    The [reform agreement’s] initiatives have done little, so far, to improve student outcomes.

    The new bilateral agreements contain more specific targets for each state and territory. However, this does not mean promises will be kept. Our 2024 research has shown how various education ministers make national schooling reform promises, which are then lost as the political cycle moves on.

    once agreements are endorsed and ratified, the ongoing commitment to the enactment of agreed education reforms can be ‘forgotten’.

    Our research has also shown how school reform also becomes stuck in the process of moving between national, state and school levels. That is, the policy intention (or reform agreement) rarely plays out the way it is intended in schools.

    What now?

    Does this mean the new agreement will also fail to produce “better and fairer” outcomes for some of Australia’s most marginalised and disenfranchised students?

    We need to be careful that real schooling reform – of which fair and full funding to every Australian schools is an important element – is not lost to the short-term political games of the election cycle.

    While the Coalition has been critical of the time taken to reach an agreement, it says it will honour the funding commitments if elected.

    So assuming Queensland signs onto the new agreement before the federal election, perhaps the promise of the original Gonski reforms will finally be realised, even if it is two decades later.

    Stewart Riddle receives funding from the Australian Research Council (LP210100098).

    ref. NSW has finally struck a school funding deal. What does this mean for schools and students? – https://theconversation.com/nsw-has-finally-struck-a-school-funding-deal-what-does-this-mean-for-schools-and-students-251271

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-OSI China: Chinese economy’s trend of long-term sound development unchanged

    Source: China State Council Information Office

    Liu Jieyi, spokesperson for the third session of the 14th Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference (CPPCC) National Committee, attends a press conference at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing, capital of China, March 3, 2025. [Photo/Xinhua]

    The underlying conditions for and basic trend of the long-term sound development of the Chinese economy remain unchanged, a spokesperson said Monday.

    Liu Jieyi, spokesperson for the third session of the 14th National Committee of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference, China’s top political advisory body, made the remarks at a press conference.

    Liu said the Chinese economy has a solid foundation, numerous advantages, strong resilience and vast potential, noting that the country has distinctive institutional strengths, a supersized domestic market and a complete industrial system.

    The spokesperson acknowledged that both domestic and external environments are undergoing profound changes and that the country’s economic development still faces many challenges and difficulties, with domestic demand still insufficient and risks in some areas yet to be defused.

    He called for addressing difficulties head-on and maintaining confidence, and stressed that the high-quality development of the economy will reach new heights.

    The country has vowed to promote opening up across more areas and in greater depth, according to the spokesperson.

    He said the country will continue to steadily expand institutional opening up, deepen foreign trade structural reform, optimize the layout for regional opening up, and improve the mechanism for high-quality Belt and Road cooperation.

    Over the past year, China has deepened the integration of scientific and technological innovation and industrial innovation, accelerated the modernization of its industrial system, and made remarkable achievements in developing new quality productive forces, Liu said.

    Noting that new quality productive forces serve as the strong engines driving China’s high-quality development, Liu called for continued efforts to further unleash their dynamism. 

    MIL OSI China News

  • MIL-OSI China: China’s Shenzhen tech hub to expand scale of AI terminal industry

    Source: China State Council Information Office

    A visitor waits for a robot-made coffee at a park in Shenzhen, south China’s Guangdong Province, Dec. 27, 2024. [Photo/Xinhua]

    China’s southern tech hub of Shenzhen on Monday published an action plan to expand the city’s AI terminal industry to a scale of 1 trillion yuan (about 139.38 billion U.S. dollars) by 2026.

    According to the plan, the output of AI terminal products in Shenzhen should exceed 150 million units by 2026. More than 50 popular AI terminal products will be launched in fields such as mobile phones, computers, large-model all-in-one machines and wearable devices.

    Key fields of the AI terminal industry involved in the plan also include AI tablets, AI imaging devices, whole-home intelligent products and industrial-grade AI terminals.

    The municipality will create more than 60 typical AI terminal application scenarios in the areas of intelligent manufacturing, smart finance, smart cities, smart elderly care and smart government affairs, per the action plan. 

    MIL OSI China News

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Closer look at Auckland’s pools welcomed by councillors

    Source: Auckland Council

    Councillors welcomed a closer look into Auckland’s swimming pool network at February’s Policy and Planning Committee. 

    A review of current and future demand for public pools and aquatic services across Tāmaki Makaurau was presented to Auckland’s elected members for discussion. 

    Councillor Richard Hills, chair of the Policy and Planning Committee, said the review is currently in its early stages, and will help develop a long-term plan for the provision of pools across Auckland in the future. 

    “Our pools are very popular with Aucklanders – with over 8 million visits to pool and leisure centres each year, they are some of our most used facilities. Providing leisure opportunities is important, but it’s not just about recreation. Learning to swim is an incredibly valuable life skill and Aucklanders should be able to access safe, local facilities to do this. 

    “We are now looking to put together a plan for the next 30 years so there are pools for Aucklanders to access across the region as it grows,” he said.  

    The review outlines where public pools are currently available to Aucklanders, and where there are gaps that need to be addressed in the future to meet the needs of the region’s growing population.   

    Deputy chair of the committee, Angela Dalton, who also chairs the Community Committee, welcomes the review and a refreshed approach to grow a network of pools across Auckland.  

    “This review will help us create a plan for fair and equitable access to pools across the region, as our population increases, and so Aucklanders can access safe and enjoyable facilities near to where they live.  

    “There is still plenty of work to be done and decisions to be made on funding and locations. But at this stage, it’s great to be looking at how we can improve and make the most of our pools.” 

    Next steps 

    Council staff will use the information from the review to put together a business case to present back to councillors early in 2026. 

    Did you know?  

    Access to Auckland Council’s public pools is free for young people aged 16 and under. Read more here.

    MIL OSI New Zealand News

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Sky News Regional Breakfast interview with Rhiannon Elston

    Source: Australian Executive Government Ministers

    RHIANNON ELSTON [HOST]: The Albanese Government has announced it will invest $6 million to improve 11 regional airports in Queensland. The money will be used to upgrade facilities at Hervey Bay, Roma and Gladstone airports and Gympie and Stanthorpe aerodromes as well. Joining me live is Queensland Senator and Assistant Minister for Regional Development Anthony Chisholm. Very good morning to you and we’ll get to that announcement in just a moment. But you’re in Hervey Bay right now as I understand it. How’s the weather looking?

    ANTHONY CHISHOLM [ASSISTANT MINISTER]: Well, it actually looks quite calm here today, Rhiannon. So there’s a bit of a breeze. But I was in Yeppoon yesterday and Hervey Bay today. So I’ve been tracking some of those early towns that were in the path of the cyclone, and they’ve all been taking advice and preparing as best they can. It seems now the risk is further south of here. So I will be heading down to Brisbane later today. But I do get a sense that Queenslanders are taking the advice and preparing as best they can, and the Federal Government are obviously working constructively with the Queensland Government to ensure that we’re as best prepared as possible.

    RHIANNON ELSTON: Okay. The Federal Government has announced more funding for regional airport upgrades across Queensland, but Western Australia and Victoria as well. What exactly is being promised?

    ANTHONY CHISHOLM: We know that for a country as big as ours that we rely on aircrafts to get around and we need good quality airports and aerodromes in regional and rural Australia. So that’s what this fund is about. It’s about improving safety, whether that be some places they need good fencing to keep some of the animals out. Others around Gladstone, it’s about a patient transfer facility so that they can get people who may need to travel to Brisbane for medical emergencies. And also upgrading tarmacs and so forth, so that they can be resilient all year round from flooding. So it’s an important program and one that is very popular in regional Australia. And I’m really pleased to be in Hervey Bay today to announce their successful bid for funding around their airport as well.

    RHIANNON ELSTON: Speaking about regional airports and airlines, what about Rex Airlines? Is there any update on what the government plans to do there?

    ANTHONY CHISHOLM: No, it’s obviously a very complex process that’s going through at the moment. We work constructively to ensure that those regional flights were maintained and that regional Australians had the confidence to book an airline ticket, knowing that Rex would continue to fly. I travel to many parts of regional Australia and it’s often only Rex that fly there, so we want to see that second round bid be successful and someone take ownership of Rex. But we understand how important it is and want to see that service continue for regional Australia.

    RHIANNON ELSTON: Yeah. Rex collapsed in part because it couldn’t compete with Jetstar. Now we see Qantas as well investing regionally, bringing more of its Q400 fleet which will increase capacity on some routes. Would the government investing in Rex mean propping it up as well? And is that the best use of taxpayer dollars?

    ANTHONY CHISHOLM: We’ve been clear. We want to see that second round successful in terms of someone taking ownership of Rex. You go to many parts of regional Queensland and indeed regional Australia, and they do pay a lot in airfares. So I think it is important to ensure that we have the right mix of competition to try and keep airfares down. But the reality is for many of the towns that these Rex cover, they are the only ones that fly there. So it’s important that we recognise that. And as a federal government, we want to ensure that service continues. Often when you’re flying Rex, you’ll be seeing an elderly person who is travelling to the city for healthcare, for instance. So that sort of work that Rex does is really important for regional Australia. That’s why the Federal Government wants to ensure that it continues.

    RHIANNON ELSTON: Okay. We just had the member for Hinchinbrook, Nick Dametto, on the program a short time ago. Now, he said the Federal Government’s flood recovery grant system has failed in North Queensland. Many people have been denied payments and neighbours are split on who can get a flood recovery payment and who can’t. Is he right that the system has failed?

    ANTHONY CHISHOLM: I know that Minister McAllister was working really constructively with the Queensland State government, was visiting regularly. I’m sure- I’m happy, I know Nick well. I’d be happy to follow up with Nick and have a chat to him to ensure that we’ve got the best possible advice about what’s happening on the ground. Obviously, Queensland is a big state. It’s impossible to be everywhere, but we want to ensure that we’re doing our part to support those people who have been impacted by weather events up in North Queensland. I know that it does have a devastating impact on communities and we need to be there for the long term, so if there are things we can learn and improve from that, I’d be more than happy to have a chat with Nick about that.

    RHIANNON ELSTON: Okay. Anthony Chisholm, thank you so much for your time this morning.

    ANTHONY CHISHOLM: No worries, Rhiannon. Thank you.

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI Australia: ABC Capricornia Breakfast interview with Jeremy Jones

    Source: Australian Executive Government Ministers

    JEREMY JONES [HOST]: Well, Senator Anthony Chisholm is in Rockhampton this week. He is the Assistant Minister for Education, Regional Development and Agriculture, and I caught up with him yesterday.

    ANTHONY CHISHOLM [ASSISTANT MINISTER]: We’re helping to open the Keppel Bay Sailing Club new headquarters, which- I’ve seen pictures, it looks absolutely fantastic. And I’m sure it will be a great addition to that community, but also provides opportunity as part of a convention centre that will hopefully drive some more business tourism to the area, which will be fantastic. And then we’re announcing some money for the Rockhampton Council to expand more housing opportunities in this area. So I know that there’s high growth, there’s a lot of people who want to move here, so we want to work with councils where possible to ensure that we can free up land for development. Good for jobs, but also good for those people who want to find a place to live as well.

    JEREMY JONES: That’s exciting that you’re going to be heading to Keppel Bay. We heard a proposal before that they’ve put in to host the sailing for the 2032 Olympics. As Assistant Regional Development Minister, what do you make of that? Do you- would you like to see the Olympics held regionally?

    ANTHONY CHISHOLM: I certainly think that we need to ensure that there’s a strong regional footprint. So we know that the substance of the Olympics will be based in South East Queensland, but I’m really passionate about being an Olympics for the whole of the state and the whole of the country as well. So I think that we should encourage, where possible and where practicable, that we have as many events spread around the state as possible so that all Queenslanders can feel part of it.

    JEREMY JONES: Is that something the Federal Government would support, to see events outside of Brisbane?

    ANTHONY CHISHOLM: The way it works so far is that we’ve contributed some financial backing for some of the facilities. That process is being led by the State Government, though, so we’re always willing to discuss proposals that they put forward, but they’re the lead agency on this. But we want to see a successful Olympics. I want to see that from a Queensland point of view. But we think there’s enormous opportunity for how we position the country – Queensland’s going to be a key beneficiary of that.

    JEREMY JONES: So exciting. And moving as well, another announcement that we’re set to see about $1 million for the Gladstone Airport Corporation to construct a fit for purpose patient transfer facility. What’s going on there?

    ANTHONY CHISHOLM: Yeah. So the Regional Airport upgrades fund is one that we’ve had running for a while now, and this is the latest round that has supported nine airports across regional Queensland, including Gladstone. What we know is that in regional Australia and regional Queensland, our airports aren’t only convenient – there actually can be a matter of life and death, and they do provide that facility. So part of the money for Gladstone was providing a patient transfer facility. It’s one that sort of is fit for purpose and can help that community. And the upgrades right across the state go to safety and flooding and lighting so that these airports can be used 24 hours a day, seven days a week.

    JEREMY JONES: We caught up with Gladstone Airport Corporation CEO Mark Cachia, who was chatting about this last week. This is what he had to say.

    [Excerpt]

    MARK CACHIA [GLADSTONE AIRPORT CORPORATION CEO]: It’s about a $5 million upgrade of the- you know, including the building of the facility, and upgrading of the apron area. Being in a regional town, finding medical specialists is very difficult. Most of the time, whenever there’s a speciality needed for surgery or treatment and it’s urgent, most patients need to go out in the Air Ambulance and head back to- head to Brisbane to find a specialist. So it’s- look, it’s quite vital for the region.

    [End of excerpt]

    JEREMY JONES: He certainly says that it is needed there, but mentioned the price tag of $5 million there. Will it be able to go ahead with just $1 million?

    ANTHONY CHISHOLM: Obviously the department will be in discussions with the council about ensuring that we- how we can best support that program. They often have to put in a submission that’s assessed by the department, and they do that on a merits-based approach, so I’m confident that they’ll be able to achieve what they’ve set out to achieve. But there’s always an openness from the Government to ensure that we’re working constructively with councils. And I imagine that story that they’re telling would be a similar one across many parts of regional Queensland.

    JEREMY JONES: You’re hearing from Senator Anthony Chisholm, who’s in Rocky this week. He’s the Assistant Minister for Education, Regional Development and Agriculture, and of course, the election coming up. How are you feeling about it for Labor?

    ANTHONY CHISHOLM: [Laughs] No, I always enjoy election campaigns because they’re an opportunity to get out and about across this great state of Queensland. Being a senator, I’m actually not up for election this time, but certainly will be out supporting the Queensland Labor Senate team and our fantastic candidates like Emily Mawson here in Capricornia, and right up and down the coast as well.

    JEREMY JONES: Are you confident?

    ANTHONY CHISHOLM: Well, I think- you’re never confident in this game, but I feel as though for the last three years we’ve put forward responsible cost of living relief, we’ve delivered on our promises, and we’re offering a vision for the future. And I think that there’s a good contrast between what an Albanese Labor Government stands for, compared to what a Dutton Liberal National Party government would mean with cuts to services. So I think there’s going to be a real contrast at this election campaign, and we’ll be out there prosecuting that case between now and whenever that election date is. Jeremy.

    JEREMY JONES: Well, Senator, thanks for joining us this morning.

    ANTHONY CHISHOLM: Thank you.

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI China: Europe unveils plan for Ukraine peace deal

    Source: China State Council Information Office 3

    Following last week’s Trump-Zelensky White House clash, more than a dozen Western leaders gathered Sunday to revive efforts for a Ukraine peace deal and propose a settlement to Washington.

    British Prime Minister Keir Starmer described the summit as a “once-in-a-generation moment for the security of Europe.” Although the meeting could push the region toward greater self-reliance in security, many observers fear the measures may be too little and too late.

    Wake-up call

    Europe now finds itself at a moment of truth in its security strategy. Before Friday’s diplomatic debacle at the White House, Russia-U.S. talks on the Ukraine crisis took place in Riyadh on Feb. 18, with neither Europe nor Ukraine given a seat at the table.

    This photo shows a scene during a defense summit in London, Britain, March 2, 2025. [Photo/Lauren Hurley/No. 10 Downing Street handout via Xinhua]

    Just one week later, U.S. President Donald Trump announced a plan to impose a 25-percent tariff on all goods imported from the European Union (EU), and justified the move by claiming that the EU was formed to “screw” the United States.

    Europe was in a “moment of real fragility,” Starmer told the BBC’s Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg.

    Asked about the White House clash involving the duo of Trump and U.S. Vice President JD Vance and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, Finnish President Alexander Stubb told BBC before the summit that the breakdown was a “wake-up call” for European nations, stressing that they must adopt a cohesive strategy for the Ukraine crisis and post-conflict arrangements.

    Stubb expressed frustration over shifting transatlantic ties, saying the U.S.-Europe relationship “is evolving,” and “we’re witnessing a more transactional United States, where the Trump administration — rightly or wrongly — is pursuing an ‘America First’ policy.”

    This has led European leaders to explore their own security solutions. At the Munich Security Conference last month, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen pushed for an emergency clause that would allow governments to increase defense spending without being constrained by the EU’s strict budget deficit rules. After Sunday’s summit, she reiterated that Europe must “step up massively” and forge a common security approach.

    French President Emmanuel Macron proposed on Sunday that European countries should boost their defense spending to between 3 and 3.5 percent of gross domestic product (GDP). His proposal came a few days after Starmer’s announcement that Britain would increase its defense spending to 2.5 percent of its GDP by 2027 and to 3 percent in the next parliamentary term, which would mean by 2034 at the latest.

    Following a bilateral meeting with Ukraine on Saturday, Britain also agreed to loan Ukraine 2.26 billion pounds (2.84 billion U.S. dollars) to bolster its defense capabilities. Shortly after the summit, Britain further committed 1.6 billion pounds (2 billion dollars) in export finance, allowing Ukraine to purchase over 5,000 air defense missiles.

    More than eight years after Britain voted to depart from the EU, it has positioned itself at the forefront of European security efforts, trying to play the role of a “bridge” between Europe and the United States to secure a peace deal for Ukraine.

    Strengthened bond

    After Sunday’s summit, Starmer outlined a four-step plan to strengthen Ukraine and support peace: to maintain military aid to Ukraine while the conflict continues and increase economic pressure on Russia; to ensure that any lasting peace guarantees Ukraine’s sovereignty and security, with Ukraine at the table for any negotiations; to deter “any future invasion by Russia” in the event of a peace deal; and to establish a “coalition of the willing” to defend Ukraine and uphold peace in the country.

    The summit’s outcome was welcomed by European leaders. NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte called it “a good meeting,” saying “European countries are stepping up to ensure Ukraine has what it needs to fight for as long as necessary.”

    German Chancellor Olaf Scholz emphasized the importance of NATO and said on social media on Sunday: “In recent years, we have strengthened our alliance with new members and increased defense spending. This is the path we will continue to follow.”

    However, doubts remain over whether Europe can fully safeguard a peace deal on its own. When asked how Britain plans to persuade more countries to join the “coalition of the willing,” Starmer acknowledged that some countries may be reluctant to contribute militarily.

    “I strongly feel that unless some countries move forward, we will stay in the position we’re in and not be able to move forward,” he said, while admitting the goal to “stay in lockstep with the United States.”

    Transatlantic disagreements

    The EU and the Trump administration have a range of disagreements on the settlement of the Ukraine crisis, while the U.S. provision of security guarantees for Ukraine is foremost among the discussions.

    Within a week before the London summit, both Macron and Starmer visited Washington to seek U.S. security guarantees for Ukraine or Europe, but failed to persuade Trump in this regard.

    U.S. President Donald Trump (2nd L) welcomes Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky (2nd R) at the White House in Washington, D.C., the United States, on Feb. 28, 2025. [Photo/Xinhua]

    Trump sidestepped the question of security guarantees, expressing confidence that his Russian counterpart, Vladimir Putin, would “keep his word” if an agreement is reached. He also ruled out the possibility of Ukraine joining NATO. Ukraine’s NATO membership has been a focal issue in the crisis.

    Earlier on Sunday before the summit, Starmer announced that Britain, France and Ukraine will work on a ceasefire plan to present to the United States. He named three essential points to achieve “lasting peace” — a strong Ukraine, a European element with security guarantees and a U.S. backstop, with the last one being the subject of “intense” discussion.

    After the announcement of the four-step plan to guarantee peace in Ukraine at the summit, the participating leaders also agreed to meet again soon to sustain the momentum behind these efforts.

    “Europe must do the heavy lifting,” Starmer said, emphasizing that the agreement needs U.S. backing.

    Iain Begg, a research fellow at the London School of Economics and Political Science, told Xinhua, “The real question is whether this will be enough to sway the White House. We’ve seen time and again that Washington can reverse its stance overnight.”

    Also on Sunday, Macron told a French newspaper that he was “trying to make Washington understand that disengaging from Ukraine is not in America’s interest.”

    While the summit has pushed Europe toward greater security commitments, the region still faces divisions over whether to deploy troops to Ukraine under a peacekeeping framework.

    For now, some major European countries, including Germany, Spain and Poland, remain hesitant to commit troops to Ukraine, with Britain and France taking the lead in potentially sending military forces.

    Meanwhile, the EU is still in the early stages of developing a defense budget plan. Some experts noted that Europe’s efforts to build its own defense capabilities may still have a long way to go.

    David Galbreath, a professor of international security at the University of Bath, pointed to the U.S. military’s capabilities: “The U.S. provides far sharper military capabilities, such as long-range strikes, sophisticated anti-tank systems and advanced surface-to-air missiles, than anything coming from Europe.”

    MIL OSI China News

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Critical funding locked in to deliver Para-Sport Unit at NSWIS

    Source: New South Wales Government 2

    Headline: Critical funding locked in to deliver Para-Sport Unit at NSWIS

    Published: 4 March 2025

    Released by: Minister for Disability Inclusion, Minister for Sport


    The Minns Labor government is today announcing $2.305 million investment towards the formation of the New South Wales Institute of Sport (NSWIS) Para Unit. 

    The NSWIS Para Unit will provide a landing place for aspiring Paralympians. It will create opportunities for holistic development and progression focusing on increased participation in sport, and the number of NSW athletes selected to compete for Australia at major international para events. 

    The funding will be used to: 

    • break down the 160 systemic barriers that have been identified as deterring potential para-athletes from entering, and progressing, in sport
    • guide more para-athletes into sport to increase participation numbers and, consequently, the talent pool for international sport
    • identify talent
    • employ specialised para-coaches and support staff
    • increase opportunities to gain classifications to compete nationally and internationally, and to enter high performance pathway
    • assist para-athletes to overcome the difficulties they encounter when travelling to domestic and international competitions. 

    NSW Minister of Sport Steve Kamper said: 

    “The Minns government believes that no athlete should be held back by barriers. 

    We’re committed to making sport accessible to all—because everyone deserves the opportunity to chase their dreams. 

    The NSWIS Para Unit will be a game-changer, providing a clear pathway for athletes to develop their skills, find purpose, and strive for greatness. “ 

    NSW Minister for Disability Inclusion Kate Washington said: 

    “We saw just last year in Paris, how the sheer grit and determination of our Paralympians can inspire the nation and open our eyes to a more inclusive society.  

    “The NSW Government has a proud history of investing in our Paralympians and cheering them on as they do us proud on the world stage.   

    “This commitment will ensure people with disability have the same opportunities to reach their full potential in sport – by providing dedicated pathways, specialist coaches, and more support.” 

     NSWIS Chief Executive Officer, Professor Kevin Thompson said:

    “Young Athletes will be inspired knowing there is now a world-class, high-performance unit that’s dedicated to nurturing emerging para-athletic talent – like them – to succeed on the world stage. 

    “The funding will be used to unearth yet to be discovered para-athletes from around the state and provide them with every opportunity to experience the joy and fellowship of sport, as well as the honour and privilege of competing for Australia at the Paralympics.” 

    Paralympics Australia Chief Executive Officer Cameron Murray said: 

    “NSW has a proud tradition in Paralympic sport, having produced many of Australia’s greatest Paralympians,”  

    “We are confident the establishment of a dedicated and well-resourced NSW Para Unit at NSWIS will prove an enormous boost for current and future athletes and coaches. 

     It is exciting to think this unit will provide opportunities for up to another 40 para-athletes over the term of the current two-year contract to come into the NSW Para-sport system and help set the foundation for an era of unprecedented success. 

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Commissioners slam NSW and WA govts over ‘shameful’ inaction on accessible homes

    Source: Australian Human Rights Commission

    Australia’s Disability and Age Discrimination Commissioners have called out the governments of NSW and Western Australia for failing older people and people with disability by not requiring new homes in their jurisdictions to meet the minimum national accessibility standards in the National Construction Code (NCC).   

    All other Australian states and territories have committed to the NCC’s minimum accessibility standards such as a step-free entrance, wider doorways, accessible bathrooms and corridors that allow for easy movement with mobility aids, ensuring a safe and continuous path of travel throughout a dwelling.

    However, the NSW and WA governments have refused to adopt the NCC standards which advocates say is creating significant problems for older people and people with disability now and into the future.

    Age Discrimination Commissioner Robert Fitzgerald AM: “Accessibility and affordability are central elements of the human right to adequate housing and it’s shameful that the NSW and WA governments are refusing to sign up to the same accessibility standards that all other states agreed to years ago.

    “Confoundingly, their resistance is in spite of all the evidence of the benefits these standards provide for older people and people with disability specifically, as well as our community and economy more broadly.”

    “Right now, older people and people with disability are at greater risk of housing stress because of a lack of accessible and affordable dwellings in the private rental market, and this situation will only get worse in the future as Australia’s population ages.

    “We need more accessible dwellings now and we’ll need a lot more in the future, so it’s perplexing that the NSW and WA governments continue to block such a simple and straightforward reform that will deliver the kind of housing stock our country desperately needs.” 

    Disability Discrimination Commissioner Rosemary Kayess: “NSW and WA can’t keep ignoring the need for accessible housing because the cost of retrofitting dwellings in those states to meet the accessibility needs of residents is much more costly than making new homes align with minimum accessibility standards now.

    “The lack of affordable and accessible housing contributes to the segregation of people with disability into ‘specialised’ housing, contributes to bed blockages within the health system, contributes to homelessness of people with disability, and contributes to people with disability living in inappropriate and inaccessible housing, generating a range of significant social, health and economic problems.”

    ENDS | Media contact: media@humanrights.gov.au or +61 457 281 897

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-Evening Report: NZ hopes to store carbon in marine ecosystems – but some are so degraded they’re already a source of emissions

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Simon Francis Thrush, Director of the Institute of Marine Science, University of Auckland, Waipapa Taumata Rau

    Shutterstock/Danita Delimont

    For New Zealand, a country with an underwater territory 14 times its landmass, marine ecosystems present a significant opportunity to investigate carbon storage options.

    Prompted by a 2023 report from the Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment, the government recognised the need to focus on the oceans in addressing climate change.

    In its emissions reduction plan for 2026-2030, it highlights the potential to harness marine habitats as carbon sinks and to count this towards the country’s efforts to slow climate change.

    Several blue-carbon studies report on stocks of carbon in sediments and mangrove, saltmarshes and kelp forests. This tells us how much carbon is stored in these ecosystems – but very little about how carbon flows through them and the factors that influence whether it is stored or emitted.

    Research shows seagrass meadows, mangroves, saltmarshes and kelp forests are significant carbon stores.
    Shutterstock/Daniel Poloha

    This is important. Marine ecosystems can be both sinks or sources of carbon. If we don’t understand how organic material is transformed or how carbon dioxide (CO₂) is either taken up by plants or emitted into the atmosphere, we will likely make poor decisions about nature-based solutions.

    To address this, we have invited researchers from the Scandinavian research partnership CoastClim – an innovative project linking seafloor biodiversity and climate – to bring their unique set of instrumentation to New Zealand to explore patterns in greenhouse gas emissions from the seafloor.

    The measurements we made this summer are tracking emissions of methane and CO₂ from seafloor sediments in the upper reaches of several harbours (Waitemata, Mahurangi and Whangateau) in the Auckland region.

    We found CO₂ concentrations were up to eight times higher than atmospheric levels in more disturbed and polluted parts of these harbours. Methane concentrations were up to 30 times higher. This shows that degraded habitats are indeed transformed into net emitters of greenhouse gases.

    Paying attention to land-coast connections

    There has been concern about the health of the Firth of Thames, at the back of the Hauraki Gulf, because the area drains a large catchment with intensive agriculture.

    We found this region is a significant source of greenhouse gases.

    Our sampling on the open coast revealed high draw-down of CO₂ in healthy patches of kelp. But this effect was reversed in areas where New Zealand’s endemic sea urchin, kina, has grazed off the kelp. These regions are known as kina barrens and they dominate many non-protected reefs.

    Kina, New Zealand’s endemic sea urchin, grazes on kelp and can turn the seafloor into a source of emissions.
    Wikimedia Commons/Shaun Lee, CC BY

    Our data highlight an important finding relevant to how we manage marine ecosystems and address both the biodiversity and climate crises. As we stress and degrade these ecosystems, they have less capacity to process carbon in ways that store it or move it into food webs. The system fails in its self-regulation and transforms into a net source of greenhouse gases.

    We argue that we have to manage these ecosystems in an integrative fashion, considering the long-term stores of carbon and the time it takes to build them up, along with the many processes that move carbon from one part of the ecosystem to another.

    Considering the dynamics of marine carbon and restoring or protecting coastal ecosystems are good options for addressing multiple challenges. We shouldn’t just be looking for good places to bank carbon but also those where good management can reduce seafloor disturbance and therefore limit the release of greenhouse gases.

    Considering climate and biodiversity

    This project highlights the importance of considering both biodiversity and climate together. If we manage one ignorant of the other, we risk failure because biodiversity matters to how we address climate change.

    This holistic understanding of the stock and flows of carbon (long-term sequestration and carbon in living organisms) is necessary if we are to identify viable long-term carbon stores. It is also crucial to assessing how the stresses we put on the marine environment can turn an ecosystem from a carbon sink to a source.

    Working with our Scandinavian colleagues also confirmed our earlier research. For a number of years, we have been studying how different stressors – including sediment disturbance, nutrient flows from land and microplastic pollution affect the way nitrogen, carbon and oxygen are processed in coastal sediments.

    These processes have implications for the release of greenhouse gases. But until now, we have not been able to test some connections and close the loop on some of our ideas.

    As with most interventions to natural ecosystems, we are better off accepting they are complex, and that any supposed “silver bullet” solutions can have unintended consequences.

    Simon Francis Thrush receives funding from currently from MBIE and the Auckland Foundation.

    ref. NZ hopes to store carbon in marine ecosystems – but some are so degraded they’re already a source of emissions – https://theconversation.com/nz-hopes-to-store-carbon-in-marine-ecosystems-but-some-are-so-degraded-theyre-already-a-source-of-emissions-248875

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-Evening Report: Another US funding cut threatens human rights in North Korea – and hands more power to a dictator

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Danielle Chubb, Associate Professor of International Relations, Deakin University

    Shutterstock

    This week, the United Nations Special Rapporteur on human rights in North Korea issued an appeal to the international community. She expressed concern about the future of civil society work on North Korean human rights.

    The cause for alarm is a sudden freeze on the funds of the National Endowment for Democracy (NED)- a US nongovernmental organisation.

    One major beneficiary of funds from the NED are groups documenting and helping to stop human rights abuses in North Korea.

    The funding halt threatens to damage further the lives of people living under one of the world’s most egregious authoritarian regimes.

    What is the NED?

    The NED is a US institution with a long history in its foreign policy, described as a “bastion of Republican internationalism”. Established by an act of Congress, it was signed into law by President Ronald Reagan in 1983.

    With bipartisan support, the NED is squarely based on core Republican values of spreading democracy through the world. It supports the work of nongovernmental organisations in more than 100 countries every year.

    While it is unclear why Elon Musk, in his role in the Department of Government Efficiency, has suddenly taken aim at this institution, the consequences of cutting off funding overnight are easy to see.

    One result is the likely end of decades-long work on North Korean human rights.

    How this affects North Korea

    One of the groups hit hard by this funding freeze is the Citizens’ Alliance for North Korean Human Rights. The original single-issue North Korean human rights organisation, it’s now planning to shut its doors.

    Without NED funding, it says it cannot cover its running costs, such as paying the rent or staff salaries.

    It also can’t continue its important work investigating and documenting human rights abuses suffered by North Korean people.

    The Citizens’ Alliance is just one of many groups, most of which are based in South Korea, that rely on the NED for their work.

    The political environment in South Korea is uncertain and precarious for North Korean human rights activists. Despite efforts to diversify funding sources over many decades, there are few other options.

    I have studied this question in-depth and over two decades. It’s a problem that cannot be overcome overnight, or even in the medium term, as it’s so deeply embedded, both politically and socially.

    In the absence of funding opportunities in South Korea, Seoul-based groups must look abroad.

    Yet many of the international support schemes available exist to fund in-country democratisation and human rights efforts.

    The authoritarian regime in North Korea is so complete that no active, open civil society efforts can safely take place. The movement relies entirely on transnational activism and so doesn’t neatly fit into existing funding schemes.

    On top of this, the funding freeze comes at a particularly bad time, with South Korea in a state of political turmoil. In the wake of the President Yoon Suk-yeol’s impeachment following his declaration of martial law, it is unclear what the future of the limited number of existing initiatives will be.

    Putting North Korea in the spotlight

    For a long time, the plight of those suffering human rights abuses inside the secretive country was not well known to the outside world.

    For decades, civil society groups built coalitions, gathered information, wrote reports, compiled databases, held public awareness-raising events, and lobbied politicians at all different levels. They then succeeded in bringing about the 2014 UN Commission of Inquiry into North Korean Human Rights.

    This inquiry, chaired by Australia’s Michael Kirby, has been the definitive document on North Korean human rights for more than ten years.

    Its findings of gross violations of human rights inside the country have formed the evidentiary basis for international action on North Korean human rights. Examples of the report’s findings include:

    • the use of political prison camps, torture, executions and other sorts of arbitrary detention to suppress real or perceived political dissent

    • an almost complete denial of the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion and association

    • the use of access to food as a means of control over the population.

    Non-profit North Korean human rights groups remain at the centre of this work. Having succeeded in putting the issue squarely on the international agenda, they continue to press for greater attention on the human rights situation from the international community.

    The groups relying on NED funding do a wide range of work. They support North Koreans living in South Korea and elsewhere abroad. Some provide support to formally record human rights abuses, helping build a robust database of testimony from survivors.

    Others back in-country accounts from underground North Korean journalists, and more still do myriad other advocacy, support and accountability work.

    But now this work could all end more suddenly than anyone could have expected.

    More power to a dictator

    The Database Center for North Korean Human Rights has paused all but its most urgent programs and launched an appeal for donations. Executive Director Hannah Song has described the situation as a crisis of “a massive and sudden cut to funding that threatens the crucial work of those on the frontlines”.

    Sokeel Park, the leader of another nongovernmental group working in this space, described it as “by far the biggest crisis facing NGOs working on this issue since the start of the movement in the 1990s”.

    This is no exaggeration. The North Korean human rights movement has had an outsized effect on the international community’s awareness and understanding of how the North Korean government maintains order and represses dissent.

    So who wins out of this? North Korea’s Supreme Leader and dictator, Kim Jong-un.

    Back in 2018, US President Donald Trump’s State of the Union address centred on the human rights violations suffered by the North Korean people at the hands of the authoritarian regime. Trump declared:

    we need only look at the depraved character of the North Korean regime to understand the nature of the nuclear threat it could pose.

    Now, by effectively silencing the government’s most vocal critics, the Trump administration appears to be giving breathing room to one of the world’s most atrocious authoritarian regimes.

    Danielle Chubb does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. Another US funding cut threatens human rights in North Korea – and hands more power to a dictator – https://theconversation.com/another-us-funding-cut-threatens-human-rights-in-north-korea-and-hands-more-power-to-a-dictator-251239

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-OSI USA: Shaheen Hosts Roundtable with New Hampshire Farmers, Highlights Harmful Impact of Trump Administration’s Federal Funding Chaos

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for New Hampshire Jeanne Shaheen
    (Londonderry, NH) – Today, U.S. Senator Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH), Ranking Member of the U.S. Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration and Related Agencies, hosted a roundtable discussion with New Hampshire farmers and agricultural producers on the impacts and uncertainty farms are experiencing as a result of President Trump’s decision to halt tens of billions of dollars of federal funding for the U.S. Department of Agriculture. The discussion follows the recent announcement that Shaheen is now the top Democrat on the U.S. Senate Appropriations Subcommittee with jurisdiction over the U.S. Department of Agriculture. You can view photos from the event here.  
    “I heard from many farmers today that are waiting on federal government reimbursement from contracts they’ve signed and completed or that have contracts stuck in limbo because they don’t know whether the federal funding they’ve been awarded will actually come through,” said Senator Shaheen. “Some of these farms are already struggling due to several years of extreme weather, and if they can’t access the funding they’ve been promised, farms will continue to suffer and the local food supply could be impacted. Congress approved this funding and now the Trump Administration must make good on these overdue payments.” 
    The discussion follows a series of roundtables and discussions with Granite Staters hosted by Shaheen to better understand and highlight the direct consequences of the Trump administration’s funding chaos and uncertainty. Following the Trump administration’s decision to freeze grants and loans disbursed by the federal government in January, Shaheen immediately condemned the move and spoke on the Senate floor against the decision to freeze federal grants and loans that families, seniors and small businesses rely on for critical, often life-saving services. 
    Shaheen has long fought to support farmers in New Hampshire, including by successfully helping to secure disaster supplemental funding for farmers impacted by crop losses in 2023. Shaheen also has a strong record of working to improve crop insurance policies to support farmers in New Hampshire and leads legislation to reform the federal government’s crop insurance program. Senator Shaheen has supported more than 230 New Hampshire small businesses who have received over $25 million to lower energy bills and cut costs through USDA’s Rural Energy for America Program. She has consistently fought for increased funding and improved support for rural development programs, including rural water programs. 

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Senator Murray On Trump’s Joint Congressional Address

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Washington State Patty Murray
    Senator Murray: “The state of the union is that the President is spitting in the face of the law and he is letting an unelected billionaire fire cancer researchers and wreck federal agencies like the Social Security Administration at will.”
    Washington, D.C. — Today, U.S. Senator Patty Murray (D-WA) issued the following statement on her decision to not attend President Donald J. Trump’s joint Congressional address:
    “I will not be attending President Trump’s address to Congress. The state of the union is that the President is spitting in the face of the law and he is letting an unelected billionaire fire cancer researchers and wreck federal agencies like the Social Security Administration at will.
    “The state of the union might be great for corrupt billionaires like Elon Musk as Trump guts our foremost consumer protection agency, and even for dictators like Putin, who are cheering on the dismantling of USAID and the betrayal of our allies—but the rest of the country is in a state of emergency as Elon fires the experts responding to bird flu or managing our nuclear weapons stockpile, all while Republicans sprint to tear apart Medicaid and kick families off their health care to pass massive tax giveaways for billionaires.
    “Instead, I’m meeting with constituents who have been harmed by this administration’s reckless firings and its illegal and ongoing funding freeze across government. There are farms and small businesses across Washington state and America who are on the verge of collapse because Trump and Elon are illegally blocking federal dollars they are owed. There are thousands of fired federal workers, many of them veterans, who have been carelessly laid off by Trump and Musk with no consideration for the services they provide and how that might harm millions of Americans, whether that’s VA patient safety or the timely disbursement of Social Security checks. I’ll be focused on sharing those stories from Washington state.”

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Ahead of Confirmation Vote, Senator Murray Blasts Linda McMahon’s Nomination: “We Cannot Have a Secretary of Education Who Doesn’t Believe in Having a Secretary of Education”

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Washington State Patty Murray
    ICYMI: Pressed by Sen. Murray, McMahon Can’t Name a Single Requirement of Landmark Education Law; Murray Grills McMahon on Trump Plans to Dismantle Education Department, DOGE Access to Sensitive Student Data
    WATCH: At Nomination Hearing, Murray Grills McMahon on Trump Plans to Dismantle Education Department
    *** WATCH: Senator Murray’s floor speech***
    Washington, D.C. — Today, U.S. Senator Patty Murray (D-WA), a senior member and former Chair of the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP) Committee, took to the Senate floor to speak out against the nomination of Linda McMahon for Secretary of Education. A formal pre-school teacher and community college educator herself, Senator Murray sounded the alarm over President Trump and Elon Musk’s plans to dismantle the U.S. Department of Education, which would devastate students, families, and schools across the country.
    “We need a Secretary of Education with a really deep understanding of how to use this crucial position to strengthen educational opportunities and outcomes for every student in this country. We need a Secretary of Education who will put students first—not billionaires—who will stand up for our kids, every single one of them, even if it means standing up to Donald Trump and Elon Musk… On each of those accounts, Linda McMahon fails to make the grade,” said Senator Murray.
    “Let’s be clear what it will mean if Trump, Musk, and McMahon have their way, and try to turn the Department of Education into something that kids read about in our history books,” continued Senator Murray. “There are 26 million K-12 students from low-income neighborhoods who could see their schools lose federal funding, lay off teachers, or even close. There are 9.8 million students at rural schools that count on federal support, which could face similar challenges. There are 7.4 million students with disabilities who could see the IDEA program upended, cutting off support that state and local taxpayers will need to provide. There are 6.6 million students who get Pell Grants to help them afford college, prepare to enter the workforce, or further their careers—who could be impacted by the chaos of abolishing the Department. And there are 8.1 million high school students and 3.3 million college students who are served by our career and technical education programs that are administered by the Department of Education.
    “So here is my message to everyone, and like any good preschool teacher, I am going to make this short and simple: We cannot have a Secretary of Education who doesn’t believe in having a Secretary of Education. That’s kind of common sense,” said Senator Murray.
    A senior member and former chair of the HELP Committee, Senator Murray has championed students and families at every stage of her career—fighting to help ensure every child in America can get a high-quality public education. Among other things, Senator Murray negotiated the bipartisan Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA), landmark legislation that she got signed into law, replacing the broken No Child Left Behind Act. As a longtime appropriator, she has successfully fought to boost funding to support students and invest in our nation’s K-12 schools, and she has secured significant increases to the Pell Grant so that it goes further for students pursuing a higher education. Senator Murray also successfully negotiated the FAFSA Simplification Act, bipartisan legislation to reform the financial aid application process, simplify the FAFSA form for students and parents, and significantly expand eligibility for federal aid.
    During McMahon’s confirmation hearing, Senator Murray pressed McMahon on whether she will ensure approved funding gets out to serve students as the law requires and whether she would protect students’ data from DOGE. She also asked McMahon to name a single requirement of ESSA—and McMahon demurred, failing to name any.
    Senator Murray’s full remarks, as delivered on the Senate floor today, are below and video is HERE:
    “I got my start in politics as a mom in tennis shoes fighting to protect a preschool program—and I still wear that label proudly.
    “I am a former preschool teacher. I’m also a former community college educator. And I am also a former school board member.
    “So, I don’t mess around when it comes to making sure every single one of our students, in every corner of our country, has access to a quality public education—one that leaves them prepared for the future, and opens the doors of opportunity wide.
    “That’s not a responsibility I take lightly. It never will be.
    “Our kids are the future of this country, and the Department of Education is really at the heart of how we make sure they are set up for success. But Donald Trump and Elon Musk want to rip the heart out of public education in America—and abolish the Department of Education.
    “Well, not if I can help it. And that’s why I believe we need a leader at the Department of Education who actually believes in the mission of the Department of Education!
    “We need a Secretary of Education with a really deep understanding of how to use this crucial position to strengthen educational opportunities and outcomes for every student in this country.
    “We need a Secretary of Education who will put students first—not billionaires—who will stand up for our kids, every single one of them, even if it means standing up to Donald Trump and Elon Musk.
    “And, Madam President, on each of those accounts, Linda McMahon fails to make the grade.
    “I’ve had concerns from the outset about whether Ms. McMahon has the experience we should expect from an Education Secretary, and I’m sorry to say my concerns have not been alleviated. Far from it!
    “I asked her in her confirmation hearing about the Every Student Succeeds Act, that is the law I negotiated with Republicans to finally fix No Child Left Behind, and provide more flexibility to states and schools, while ensuring accountability for our tax dollars. She couldn’t name a single requirement of the law—not one!
    “How is she supposed to enforce our education laws when she didn’t even bother to study up before her Senate confirmation hearing?
    “On fighting for public schools, it is already painfully clear that McMahon’s plan for our students and schools is in lockstep with Trump’s pro-billionaire agenda.
    “They are going to let public schools get robbed blind as the richest people in the world suck money out of the schools and communities that need it the most. They’re going to cut off funding that directly supports our students and teachers, and send it straight to the pockets of unaccountable private and for-profit K-12 schools.
    “And on standing up for our students, standing up to President Trump—Linda McMahon got it backwards.
    “When I asked her at our hearing about making sure schools get the money that we, Congress, passes—even if Trump and Musk try to block it—and making sure that our students’ data is protected as DOGE tries to muck around with no oversight or accountability, she made it very clear: she would not stand in their way.
    “But it gets worse, because when it comes to Trump’s mission of destroying the Department of Education, she’s all too ready to grab a hatchet and get to work.
    “The irony is, that while Trump and Musk talk about eliminating the Department of Education, they are trying to involve the federal government even deeper into schools than ever before.
    “They talk about how schools and parents know best—and then threaten schools if they don’t do what they say!
    “Apparently, Ms. McMahon thinks: why should we have a Department of Education if Trump and Elon Musk actually can just tell schools what they can do, and what they can teach?
    “Well let’s be clear what it will mean if Trump, Musk, and McMahon have their way, and try to turn the Department of Education into something that kids read about in our history books.
    “There are 26 million K-12 students from low-income neighborhoods who could see their schools lose federal funding, lay off teachers, or even close.
    “There are 9.8 million students at rural schools that count on federal support, which could face similar challenges.
    “There are 7.4 million students with disabilities who could see the IDEA program upended, cutting off support that state and local taxpayers will need to provide.
    “There are 6.6 million students who get Pell Grants to help them afford college, prepare to enter the workforce, or further their careers—who could be impacted by the chaos of abolishing the Department.
    “And there are 8.1 million high school students and 3.3 million college students who are served by our career and technical education programs that are administered by the Department of Education.
    “Trying to abolish the Department—or even just taking a wrecking ball to the critical work that it does—will hurt our students who face homelessness. It will cut off federal aid to students who want to pursue a higher education. It will undermine enforcement of the rights of students with disabilities. It will reduce assistance intended to lift up students not getting the support they need, weaken protections for students, scrap evidence-based research that helps us know what is working, for whom, and how, and it will leave for-profit colleges free to rip off students and families, which we have seen happen in the past, and we can’t let that happen again.  
    “So, the fact that Ms. McMahon has not opposed Trump’s grand plan to abolish the Department of Education is not just a red flag—it is a blinking, blaring fire alarm.
    “It means either she doesn’t fully understand just what the Department does and how devastating it would be to abolish, or she doesn’t care. Either way, I have to say, I find that disqualifying.
    “So here is my message to everyone, and like any good preschool teacher, I am going to make this short and simple: We cannot have a Secretary of Education who doesn’t believe in having a Secretary of Education. That’s kind of common sense.
    “I mean, why would we have someone in charge of the education department who thinks it should not exist, who doesn’t care if we have a Department focused on getting our students and schools the support they need?
    “So, Madam President, let me finish with this. I still have in my office a quilt that my kids, in my preschool, made for me on the very last day I taught preschool.
    “It is hung prominently on the wall of my biggest meeting room, it is a beautiful patchwork of squiggles and smiles drawn in bright messy crayon.
    “And when I look at it, I remember the little hands that made each one of those squares. I think about those little heads with big curious minds and a world of possibilities before them.
    “I remember the responsibility that we all felt to make sure they were leaving our preschool ready to succeed.
    “I wonder how many of the children that made those little small squares now have kids of their own.
    “And I reflect on how the decisions we make in education today—the policies that we fight for, the people that we confirm or reject here—will set a course for our children and our country for years to come.  
    “There are two clear courses ahead of us with this vote: one where we have a Department of Education that continues to work to support every student, and give them a bright possible future—or one where we don’t.
    “One where every kid is on their own. One where lights are turned off, anddoors are shut,and opportunities are closed—unless you happen to have the right zip code, or the right money.
    “I know which future I’m going to vote for today—the one where we live up to our responsibility and all of our kids can live up to their fullest potential and pursue big dreams.
    “I urge my colleagues to join me in voting for that future—and against Linda McMahon for Secretary of Education.”

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: SCHUMER TO BRING CENTRAL NY USDA WORKER – FIRED BY DOGE AFTER YEARS OF SERVICE – WHO HELPED FARMERS & RURAL BUSINESSES ACROSS UPSTATE NY AS HIS PERSONAL GUEST TO PRESIDENT TRUMP’S JOINT ADDRESS TO…

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for New York Charles E Schumer
    Tiffany Ramos, A Rome, NY Native & SUNY Morrisville Graduate, Worked At The USDA Since 2021, Helping Farms, Businesses & Residents Of Rural Communities Across Upstate, Until She Was Unfairly Fired As “Probationary” Amid Blind Rash Of DOGE Cuts
    Senator Says Callously Firing Dutiful Public Servants Like Tiffany And Slashing USDA Programs That Farmers & Rural Areas Depend On Does Nothing To Stop Government Waste, And Shows Why Efficiency Demands A Scalpel, Not A Chainsaw
    Schumer: We Should Not Be Firing The Upstate NY-er’s Who Help Our Farmers & Rural Businesses Grow
    Amid mass firings and funding freezes at the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) because of DOGE, hurting farms, businesses, and residents of rural communities in Upstate NY and across all corners of NY, U.S. Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer today announced he will bring former Syracuse USDA employee, Tiffany Ramos, as his personal guest to attend President Trump’s Joint Session of Congress. Tiffany was fired earlier this month from the USDA’s Rural Development (RD) office where she worked helping farmers, businesses, and rural communities across Upstate NY get the financial assistance they needed, despite her years of service and critical work helping rural New Yorkers.
    “Our farms and rural businesses are the lifeblood of Upstate NY, and the backbone of America. For nearly half a decade, Tiffany Ramos brought passion and commitment to her work at the USDA’s offices in Central New York and the Mohawk Valley, helping rural communities across Upstate New York.  Support for our farmers, support for rural businesses, and jobs like Tiffany’s that help rural areas thrive are not government waste,” said U.S. Senator Charles E. Schumer. “Tiffany embodies the devotion and determination that makes America’s public servants the best in the world. I am all for cutting out inefficiency, but you use a scalpel, not a chainsaw. You don’t rip resources away from our farmers and rural businesses that are already struggling. I am proud to bring Central New York’s own Tiffany Ramos as my guest to President Trump’s Joint Session of Congress and will be fighting to reverse cuts like these that hurt Upstate NY’s farms and rural businesses.”
    “My colleagues and I at the USDA proudly serve the farmers and businesses in our rural communities, living alongside them, understanding their needs, and fighting for their interests. The mass terminations at USDA is not just about me losing my job, it’s the dangerous message we’re sending to rural America. We’re telling farmers, small business owners, healthcare providers and residents of rural communities that they don’t matter enough for our federal government to support the staff needed to help them succeed,” said former USDA employee Tiffany Ramos. “The extraordinary members of the federal civil service I have had the pleasure of working with are not the enemy and are not sitting behind computers doing nothing, rather we are hard at work out in our communities every single day.”
    Tiffany Ramos is a former Farm Service Agency (FSA) Program Technician and RD Business Program Technician based at the USDA’s offices in Oneida and Onondaga Counties. Originally from Rome, NY Tiffany graduated from SUNY Morrisville with an Associate’s Degree in Equine Science & Farm Management in 2009 and a Bachelor’s Degree in Agriculture Business Development in 2021.
    Tiffany started her career at the USDA in 2021 as an FSA Programs Technician. Over her years of work at FSA, Tiffany served as Oneida County’s primary technical contact on Farm Storage Facility loans, Marketing Assistance loans, conservation programs, and more. In 2024, Tiffany voluntarily transferred to USDA RD’s office in Syracuse to fill a Business Program Technician position that had been open for years. During her time at RD, Tiffany took on a statewide portfolio overseeing various loan, loan guarantee, and grant programs to help provide financial support to farms and rural businesses. 
    Tiffany was not on the initial list of probationary employees provided to the USDA after President Trump took office, but after her recent transfer Tiffany specifically reached out to OPM to double check her status. On Wednesday, February 12, 2025, OPM informed Tiffany that her years of service at FSA would be counted towards her retirement and leave. Nonetheless, Tiffany was blindsided by an email the very next day with news of her immediate termination. Since then, Tiffany has not received any update on the termination procedure or next steps, leaving her unclear on the status of healthcare insurance and making it difficult to file for unemployment benefits.
    Tiffany’s termination letter claimed that her continued employment was not “in the public interest” despite all of Tiffany’s performance evaluations rating her as “Fully Successful” and zero documentation of poor performance or unsatisfactory work. Schumer said this is a prime example of blind and misguided ‘DOGE’ layoffs hurting American farmers, businesses and residents in our rural communities while creating chaos in every corner of New York State and all across the country.
    President Trump has fired federal workers across Upstate New York, including at the USDA’s Syracuse office where workers like Tiffany help farmers and rural businesses. In January, President Trump froze all federal payments including at the USDA, creating ongoing chaos for farmers and rural communities in Upstate New York. Farmers across the country are still reporting missing payments that they depend on to continue operations. Schumer explained that laying off workers like Tiffany is only hurting farmers, businesses, and rural communities more by cutting off resources they need and limiting staff who can help them.
    President Trump’s layoffs have hurt programs across the USDA, which in tandem with chaos from executive orders, the funding freeze, and slashing of other critical programs like USAID that support farmers, are causing serious financial hardship and worry for agriculture across America. Experts say these massive layoffs at the USDA, which range from those who help rural businesses to top agricultural scientists, could have severe and long lasting impacts for farms and America’s food supply chain. Schumer said DOGE’s approach of fire first and ask questions later cannot continue. As one significant example, last month, DOGE carelessly fired approximately 25% of the employees working on combatting bird flu at the USDA, and now struggling to rehire them, and undermining a response to reduce the crushing prices of eggs Americans are facing.
    Farmers in Upstate NY have reported missing or delayed payments from dozens of programs. One example are programs in the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) that Senator Schumer led to passage in the Senate, which boosted funding for the USDA RD’s Rural Energy for America Program (REAP), which provides loans and grants to help farmers improve their infrastructure, expand economic opportunities, create jobs and improve the quality of life for millions of Americans in rural areas. The USDA has made billions of dollars available through REAP, but due to Trump’s federal funding fiasco ‘DOGE’ is reviewing millions in REAP payments, and farmers are missing REAP payments they rely on.  Schumer said we cannot continue cutting off resources for farms and rural America and is fighting to reverse these harmful cuts at the USDA.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Federal electoral divisions in the Northern Territory formalised [4 March 2025]

    Source: Australian Electoral Commission

    AECMedia

    Updated: 4 March 2025

    The next federal election will be conducted on new electoral division boundaries in the Northern Territory after a notice was published today in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.

    While final names and boundaries for House of Representatives seats in the Northern Territory were announced on Tuesday 7 January 2025, today’s gazette is the step that formally sets them in place and provides people with further information about the new boundaries.

    The final redistribution report will be available after the Minister has tabled material in both houses of Parliament.

    Northern Territory households notified of seat change ahead of the 2025 federal election

    Approximately 2,000 households in the city of Palmerston that were previously in the electoral division of Lingiari will now be in the division of Solomon for the federal election. In the coming few weeks, the AEC will be notifying these households of that change.

    AEC Northern Territory Manager Geoffrey Bloom said that a federal election date could be announced any day, and that it must be held sometime in either April or May.

    “With a federal election coming it is important that voters know whether they’ll be voting in either Lingiari or Solomon for the House of Representatives,” Mr Bloom said.

    “There will be an automatic change made on their enrolment record but the action required by voters is simply to know what their seat is ahead of time so they can be prepared when they’re thinking about who they might vote for.”

    Editor’s notes:

    • People on the electoral roll who are affected by the redistribution will now be moved into their new federal electoral division in readiness for the 2025 election. No action is necessary.
    • Further information about the redistribution process
    • Households can expect to see letters arriving in the coming weeks.
    • Enrol, update or check enrolment: aec.gov.au
    • Northern Territory federal redistribution

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI USA: As Measles Epidemic Spreads, Warren Demands RFK Jr. Explain “Irresponsible and Reckless” Efforts to Undermine Vaccines at Health Agency

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Massachusetts – Elizabeth Warren

    March 03, 2025

    “You were an anti-vaccine crusader before becoming HHS Secretary, and now appear to be continuing that crusade while in office — risking deadly consequences for the American public.” 

    “These are dangerous times for public health – and your irresponsible and reckless efforts to undermine the nation’s vaccine policy threaten to fan the flames of disaster.” 

    Text of Letter (PDF)

    Washington, D.C. – U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) wrote to Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) Robert F. Kennedy regarding his dangerous actions to undermine vaccines and vaccine production, just weeks after he was confirmed as Secretary and days after he published a new op-ed.  

    “In your March 2nd op-ed responding to the Texas measles outbreak, which has already killed one unvaccinated child, you failed to include a strong call for vaccinations. Instead, you claimed that ‘good nutrition remains a best defense against most chronic and infectious diseases.’ Do you believe good nutrition is a better defense against measles than the MMR vaccine?” asked Senator Warren. “Will you change course and tell American parents to vaccinate their children to protect against measles, yes or no?”

    Ahead of his February 2025 confirmation vote in the Senate, Secretary Kennedy committed to maintaining the Center for Disease Control and Prevention’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Process (ACIP), which advises the federal government on vaccine approvals, and that he would “base vaccine recommendations on data-driven, evidence-based, and medically sound research.”

    However, on February 20, 2025, Politico reported that Secretary Kennedy had started preparing to replace members of the committee. Shortly after, he postponed ACIP’s first meeting of his tenure — during which it had planned to take votes related to vaccines for “HPV, RSV, influenza, and Lyme disease” — without rescheduling it for a later date. 

    Later that month, Secretary Kennedy cancelled a meeting of a key FDA committee that would have selected the flu strains included in the 2025-26 flu vaccine. The flu is estimated to kill between 6,000 and 52,000 Americans each year, and the delay of this meeting threatens the timely manufacturing of this year’s flu vaccines. 

    “(I)nterfering with the timely production of a safe and effective flu vaccine will endanger thousands — particularly children and seniors, who are most likely to die or become hospitalized due to the flu,” said Senator Warren

    Meanwhile, Secretary Kennedy is chairing a “Make America Healthy Again” commission, created by President Trump, which is already undermining confidence in vaccines. Secretary Kennedy has declared that the commission will investigate the “childhood vaccine schedule” and that “nothing is going to be off limits.” 

    Amidst multiple public health crises, Secretary Kennedy’s actions are dangerous. In Texas, a deadly measles outbreak is raging. The United States is also in the middle of its deadliest flu epidemic in 15 years, with at least 19,000 Americans dead. Experts are increasingly warning about the spillover of the H5N1 bird flu into humans, and the potential for a deadly pandemic. Last week, HHS announced that it is “reevaluating” its funding agreement with Moderna for an mRNA-based bird flu vaccine.

    “The mission of the agency you lead is ‘to enhance the health and well-being of all Americans.’ You are already failing to do so — and you must reverse course immediately,” said Senator Warren.

    Senator Warren demanded Secretary Kennedy explain his recent actions to undermine vaccines at HHS by March 10, 2025. 

    Senator Warren has led the resistance to Donald Trump’s nominee to lead the Department of Health and Human Services, for his conflicts of interest and misleading views on vaccines: 

    • On February 13, 2025, following Senate Republicans voting to confirm Robert F. Kennedy Jr. for Secretary of Health and Human Services, Senator Elizabeth Warren released a statement calling his confirmation “a huge mistake” and said his conflicts of interest would allow him and his family to “continue getting richer from his anti-vaccine crusade.” 
    • On February 12, 2025, on the Senate floor, Senator Elizabeth Warren joined Democrats in delaying a final vote to confirm Robert F. Kennedy Jr. for Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services. In her speech, she warned that American families and children would pay the price for Mr. Kennedy’s “conspiracy-driven health care decisions,” while his serious ethics conflicts remain unresolved.
    • On February 6, 2025, Senators Elizabeth Warren and Tim Kaine (D-Va.) wrote to then-nominee Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. about his continued conflicts of interest. The senators called out Mr. Kennedy’s plan to enter office with a serious ethics conflict by keeping a financial interest in anti-vaccine lawsuits within his family, asked him to recuse himself from former clients’ matters, commit to not lobbying HHS after his tenure as Secretary, and more.
    • On February 4, 2025, following the Senate Finance Committee vote to advance the nomination of RFK Jr. for Secretary of Health and Human Services, Senator Warren gave remarks regarding Mr. Kennedy’s continued conflicts of interest. 
    • On February 3, 2025, Senators Warren and Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), Ranking Member on the Senate Finance Committee, wrote to RFK Jr., pressing him to urgently resolve his serious conflicts of interest before the committee vote Wednesday morning.
    • On January 31, 2025, following pressure from Senate Democrats, RFK Jr., agreed to amend his flawed ethics agreement (see Warren QFRs at the end of Part 2 and start of Part 3).
    • On January 29, 2025, at a hearing of the Senate Finance Committee, Senator Warren questioned Mr. Robert F. Kennedy Jr., nominee for Secretary of Health and Human Services, about his dangerous conflicts of interest and record of profiting from anti-vaccine conspiracies.
    • On January 18, 2025, ahead of RFK Jr.’s confirmation hearing for Secretary of Health and Human Services, Senator Warren sent a 34-page letter detailing her concerns with his nomination and asked him to answer 175 questions ahead of his hearing before the Finance Committee.
    • On November 14, 2024, in response to the news that President-elect Donald Trump selected Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to serve as Secretary of Health and Human Services, Senator Warren released a statement calling him a “danger to public health, scientific research, medicine, and health care coverage for millions of Americans.”

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Australia: All New South Wales public schools on a path to full and fair funding

    Source: Australian Ministers for Education

    The Albanese and Minns Labor Governments have reached an Agreement to fully and fairly fund New South Wales public schools.
     
    As part of the Heads of Agreements signed today, the Commonwealth will provide an additional 5 per cent of the Schooling Resource Standard (SRS) to New South Wales.
     
    This will lift the Commonwealth contribution from 20 per cent to 25 per cent of the SRS by 2034 and follows New South Wales delivering its election commitment to reach 75 per cent of the SRS in 2025, two years ahead of the former Liberal National Government.
     
    This will see an estimated $4.8 billion in additional Commonwealth funding to New South Wales public schools over the next 10 years.

    This represents the biggest ever new investment in New South Wales public schools by the Australian Government.
     
    New South Wales has also committed to removing the 4 per cent provision of indirect school costs such as capital depreciation so that New South Wales schools will be fully funded over the life of the Agreement.
     
    Commonwealth funding will be tied to the reforms needed to lift education standards across the country, including more individualised support for students, continuing evidence-based teaching practices, and more mental health and wellbeing support for schools.

    This is not a blank cheque. The Agreement will be accompanied by a New South Wales Bilateral Agreement, which ties funding to reforms that will help students catch up, keep up and finish school, such as:  

    • Year 1 phonics and early years of schooling numeracy checks to identify students who need additional help;
    • evidence-based teaching and targeted and intensive supports such as small-group or catch-up tutoring to help students who fall behind;
    • initiatives that support wellbeing for learning – including greater access to mental health professionals;
    • access to high-quality and evidence-based professional learning, and
    • initiatives that improve the attraction and retention of teachers.

    In addition to these reforms, the Agreements have national targets that complement the New South Wales Government’s own public school targets released last week.

    National targets include: 

    • Improving NAPLAN proficiency levels for reading and numeracy across all year levels;
    • Increasing the outcomes for priority equity cohorts in NAPLAN results;
    • Increasing the Student Attendance Rate;
    • Increasing the engagement rate (completed or still enrolled) of initial teacher education students; and
    • Increasing the proportion of students leaving school with a Year 12 certificate.

    This means more help for students and more support for teachers.

    Today’s agreement with New South Wales follows agreements with Western Australia, the Northern Territory, Tasmania, the Australian Capital Territory, South Australia and Victoria.
     
    The Commonwealth is continuing to work with Queensland.
     
    Quotes attributable to Prime Minister Anthony Albanese:
     
    “Building Australia’s Future means investing in the next generation.
     
    “That’s why every dollar of this funding will go into helping children learn.
     
    “We know that education opens the doors of opportunity, and we want to widen them for every child in Australia.
     
    “This is about investing in real reform with real funding – so all Australian children get the best possible education.”
     
    Quotes attributable to New South Wales Premier Chris Minns:
     
    “Public education is the best investment any government can make. Every dollar spent in this space is a dollar spent on the future of our country.

    “Every single child in Australia has the right to a quality, free public education and we are proud to work with the Albanese Labor Government to ensure New South Wales schools are fully funded.
     
    “We’ve seen a 40% reduction in teacher vacancies since we came to government, but we know there’s still more to do.

    “This investment is vital as we work to lift education standards across the state by ensuring there is a qualified, dedicated teacher at the front of the classroom.”
     
    Quotes attributable to Minister for Education, Jason Clare:

    “This is big. The biggest state in the country has now signed up.
     
    “This will help more than 780,000 kids in more than 2,200 public schools.
     
    “This is real funding tied to real reforms to help students catch up, keep up and finish school.
     
    “It’s not a blank cheque. I want this money to get results.
     
    “That’s why funding will be directly tied to reforms that we know work.
     
    “It will help make sure every child gets a great start in life. What every parent wants. And what every Australian child deserves.”
     
    Quotes attributable to New South Wales Minister for Education and Early Learning Prue Car:

    “This incredible outcome for public schools will allow us to deliver on the ambitious targets we have set for the public education system in New South Wales.

    “Our commitment to rebuilding public education will now be underpinned by an agreement that delivers full funding for public schools.
     
    “The Minns Labor Government inherited a teacher shortage crisis and falling outcomes after a decade of under funding by Federal and State Liberal and National Governments that saw 10,000 merged and cancelled classes daily and over 3000 teacher vacancies.
     
    “With teacher vacancies now down 40 per cent and the number of cancelled classes halved, we are delivering tangible results.  

    “This investment will enable us to restore public education in New South Wales to the world-leading standards that families deserve.”

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Transcript-radio interview-ABC South East NSW Breakfast

    Source: Australian Executive Government Ministers

    EDDIE WILLIAMS: Bega will become home to a new Medicare urgent care clinic, while the existing clinic at Batemans Bay will see its hours extended under an election promise from the Labor Government. It’s part of a $644 million commitment to open another 50 urgent care clinics across the country. The Member for Eden-Monaro is Kristy McBain. Good morning. 

    KRISTY MCBAIN: Good morning, Eddie. 

    WILLIAMS: How do these clinics work?

    MCBAIN: These clinics are aimed at trying to free up emergency departments for real emergencies. Those urgent matters like cuts that need stitches, burns, a sprain at the local football on the weekend, minor breaks. Those things can all be done through the Urgent Care Clinic, so that you’re not waiting in an emergency department, and you’re leaving the resources there for people who need emergency care. 

    WILLIAMS: Have they been effective in that? Or do patients often end up being referred to the emergency department anyway? 

    MCBAIN: There are times where patients do get referred to the emergency department. I was at an Urgent Care Clinic yesterday, and previously they had referred someone who had chest pains to the emergency department. They do refer patients that are in emergency situations anyway, that’s what they’re required to do. It’s our health system working to its best, where we’ve got GPs taking care of those routine appointments, where you’ve got Urgent Care Clinics dealing with people that have got, urgent medical needs. Then you’ve got the emergency department dealing with those serious emergency issues in our hospitals. 

    WILLIAMS: Why Bega as a location for one of these clinics? 

    MCBAIN: We went to the last election with a commitment to open 50 Medicare Urgent Care Clinics and we’ve delivered 87. We know that they’ve been incredibly effective, but the locations of the additional 50 Medicare Urgent Care Clinics were determined based on advice from the Department of Health and Aged Care. The exact locations of those will be worked through with an independent commissioning process, which is the same process that has delivered the previous 87. That commissioning process is run by the primary health networks or state and territory governments, independent of the Commonwealth. We’re looking at the data which shows where these clinics are best located, and making sure we’re giving people more options and more choice for healthcare. 

    WILLIAMS: When you say, you know that they’re working, the Royal Australian College of GPs says there’s been no sign of an evaluation to show whether they are actually providing value for money or helping keep people away from hospital. Is this really the best use of $644 million, or would, more support for GPs be a better bang for buck? 

    MCBAIN: Obviously, we’ve strengthened Medicare rebates over the last three years. We’ve tripled that bulk billing incentive, and worked really closely with GPs on a whole range of things. The announcement we made to strengthen Medicare by a further investment of $8.5 million not only provides additional rebates in the Medicare system, it also provides more Commonwealth supported places at universities to train doctors. It provides scholarships to nurses and nurse practitioners to upskill themselves to get further qualifications. It provides incentives to get those medical graduates to take up the GP specialisation so that we can get more doctors into our system. That’s on top of waiving HECS for doctors and nurse practitioners who go out and practice in rural and remote Australia. We’re really focused on that workforce issue, as well as strengthening Medicare, as well as providing more healthcare options across our communities. 

    WILLIAMS: Yeah. Does that work for workforce issue going to be a challenge here as well? How difficult will it be to staff these clinics? 

    MCBAIN: The workforce issue has been there for many decades. What we’re doing is concentrating on how we can get more people studying medicine at university. As I said, more Commonwealth supported places. We’ve worked with communities across the country to put in rural medical schools and training options into our regional hospitals so that people, when they come out and train in a regional area, are more likely to stay there. We are continuing to focus on that workforce issue with a number of the incentive programs that we’ve got now for doctors and nurse practitioners to go out into our region. We’ll continue to focus on the training option as well as strengthening the rebates, as well as making sure we’ve got more care options. It’s incredibly important that we continue to keep those focuses on all aspects of healthcare. 

    WILLIAMS: When would you hope that this clinic in Bega would open? 

    MCBAIN: Obviously following the next election that independent commissioning process will be undertaken by the Primary Health Network or the state government, depending on who we partner with at that time. Hopefully we’ll see one up and running very soon. 

    WILLIAMS: You’re hearing from Kristy McBain, the Member for Eden-Monaro. Labor’s also promising to freeze the excise on beer. The Coalition’s committed to the same. Will you consider freezing the tobacco excise as well?

    MCBAIN: We’ve listened to communities and I’ve spoken to numerous publicans and club managers across our community. What we don’t want to see is people not going out to socialise. We don’t want to see some of our small businesses that provide social connection in our community fail because of the excise, which goes up by CPI twice a year. We’ve campaigned really heavily to make sure that this announcement was made. It’s incredibly important that we continue to focus on how we can assist people with cost of living. This is another way, along with our cheaper medicines policy, the cheaper childcare policy. At this stage, we haven’t discussed the excise on tobacco. 

    WILLIAMS: Telstra held a community forum in Narooma on Friday. That was something you’d asked them to do after a lot of locals had poor mobile coverage during peak holiday season. How confident are you that things will be better next summer? 

    MCBAIN: It was really good for Telstra to hear directly from community members about the frustrations they had with congested signals and call drop outs, particularly during the summer period. They have assessed the tower that services the main township of Narooma and have found that it is congested and they are looking at putting up additional spectrum on that tower. It’s in addition to the work that they’re doing for a new tower in Dalmeny, and small cells in mystery Bay, which have been funded already. It was incredibly pleasing for community to hear that their concerns were being heard, and that there is more work happening, particularly on that Narooma Tower with additional spectrum. It is important, though, that we continue to tell Telstra when there are problems, so that it can be reported and it can be looked into by the Telstra engineers. We remain open to passing that feedback directly to Telstra for consumers, if that’s what’s required. 

    WILLIAMS: Couple of quick questions from the community on health. Jane asks where’s the funding for dental clinics in the hospital and down at Pambula Community Centre? Or what can the government do when it comes to dental care in the region? 

    MCBAIN: Obviously dental care is provided by Community Health through New South Wales Health. We continue to work with them on how we can provide more options to the community, particularly into dental care. The community health fair in Pambula does a great job, but it takes a while to get an appointment and we continue to work with the New South Wales Health Department on what additional options they can provide.

    WILLIAMS: Robyn in Bega asks, if you have a fracture, wouldn’t a hospital be faster than an Urgent Care Clinic? 

    MCBAIN: At times an Urgent Care Clinic can be faster. We saw over the weekend when I was in Queanbeyan someone that came in with what appeared to be a fracture or a break in the foot. It turned out to be a serious sprain instead. They were in and out of that Urgent Care Clinic within an hour. It’s important to know if you do need to be referred on to emergency department, you will, but in many cases,  it can be dealt with quicker through the emergency care centre. 

    WILLIAMS: Kristy McBain, appreciate your time this morning. Thank you. 

    MCBAIN: Good to be with you. 

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Remarks by President Trump on Investment Announcement

    US Senate News:

    Source: The White House
    class=”has-text-align-center”>Roosevelt Room
    2:38 P.M. EST
         THE PRESIDENT:  Hello, everybody.  Thank you very much.
         Thank you very much.  This is a very big day for a lot of reasons, but this gentleman is a very unique man.  I think I can say, in the world of chips, certainly, but in the world pretty much of business, nobody has done what he’s done.  For those of you that are into that world, you would say, “Wow, he’s a legend.”  But he is a legend.  And it’s an honor to be with you.  Very great honor.  Thank you very much.
         MR. WEI:  Thank you, Mr. President.
         THE PRESIDENT:  Thank you very much.
         Welcoming, from TSMC — which is the biggest there is, at a level that you can’t even calculate, frankly — C.C. Wei, to the White House for a very historic announcement.  This is a tremendous thing for our country and, hopefully, for his company. 
         We’re also pleased to be joined by Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and White House AI and crypto czar, David Sacks, another two very highly respected people.  It’s great to have you guys involved.  And, David, thank you very much for coming on.
         David is sort of the king of intellect in that world.  We have some good people.     Today, Taiwan Semiconductor is announcing that they will be investing at least $100 billion dollars in new capital in the United States over the next short period of time to build state-of-the-art semiconductor manufacturing facilities.  I think, mostly, it’s going to be in Arizona, which is what I understand, which is a great state.  I like it because I won it.  But I won most of them — (laughs) — actually.  So — but I did.  We won it, and we won it big.
         The most powerful AI chips in the world will be made right here in America, and it’ll be a big percentage of the chips made by his company.  But, as you know, they’re based mostly in Taiwan.  And they’re far and away the biggest.  There’s nobody even close. 
         This $100 billion in new investment will go into building five cutting-edge fabrication facilities in the great state that we just discussed, Arizona, and will create thousands of jobs — many thousands of jobs, and they’re high-paying jobs.     In total, today’s announcement brings Taiwan Semiconductor investments to about $165 billion — they’ve started already — among the largest new foreign direct investments in United States.
         Apple, as you know, made a big announcement last week of $500 billion, and we have some others that have announced. 
         We have many that want to announce.  But I don’t have time to do all of these announcements, I tell you.  But, for you, I’m doing the announcement.
         MR. WEI:  Thank you.
         THE PRESIDENT:  This will create hundreds of billions of dollars in economic activity and boost America’s dominance in artificial intelligence and beyond. 
         Semiconductors are the backbone of the 21st century economy — and, really, without the semiconductors, there is no economy — powering everything from AI to automobiles to advanced manufacturing.  And we must be able to build the chips and semiconductors that we need right here, in American factories, with American skill and American labor.  And that’s exactly what we’re doing.
         As you know, Taiwan pretty much has a monopoly on that market.  And I think “pretty much” is not a term that’s even appropriate.  They do have a monopoly.  And this is a tremendous move by the most powerful company in the world. 
         It’s a matter of economic security.  It’s also a matter of national security for us.  And, at the same time, Mr. Wei will be able to diversify and have his tremendous presence in another place and a very safe place.  And I want to thank Taiwan Semiconductor for doing the announcement.  
         And I’d like to ask Mr. Wei to say a few words, if you might.
         And I’d also like to ask Howard and David — you can say a couple of words.  But maybe you should go first because, right now, he’s the most important man in the room.  I’m sorry, fellas.
         Please.
         Thank you very much.  Thank you.  Great honor.  
         MR. WEI:  Thank you, Mr. President.
         THE PRESIDENT:  Thank you.
         MR. WEI:  I’m a — I’m a little bit nervous, so I have to pull out my piece of paper.
         Mr. President, Secretary Lutnick — and, David, I didn’t know that — your title, but — okay.
         First, I want to thank — say thank you to Mr. President to give me this opportunity to announce our big project in the U.S. 
    TSMC is the world’s largest chip manufacturing, founded by Dr. Morris Chang in 1987.  It’s now at the forefront of semiconductor technology, supporting AI advancement and industry growth. 
         In fact, I would like to wind back the time that in 2020 we have to thank President Trump’s vision and his support.  So, TSMC start the journey of establishing the advanced chip manufacturing in Arizona.  And now, let me proudly say, now the vision become reality.  
         In Phoenix, Arizona, with 3,000 employees, we are producing the most advanced chip made on U.S. soil with the success of our first fab. 
         So, we are now very happy to announce we are going to invest additional 100 billion U.S. dollar in addition to our current 65-billion-U.S.-dollars investment in Arizona.  We are going to build three more new fab — be- — after we promised the three fabs already, and another two very advanced packaging fab, and, most important, an R&D center, also in Arizona. 
         For this, all the investment — $165 billion — is going to create thousand of the high-paid job, as the president just announced.  And we are, most important — actually, we are going to produce many AI chips.  We are going to produce many chips to support AI’s progress and to support the smartphone’s progress. And, again, with that, I want to thank President Trump again for his support.  In addition, I also want to thank my customers in the U.S., such as Apple, Nvidia, AMD, Qualcomm, Broadcom.  They all support TSMC’s manufacturing in the U.S.  Without their support, we probably cannot make it true. 
    So, again, I want to thank them.  Also, I’d like to thank the TSMC’s employee.  Without their effort, we just cannot make it today. 
    That’s all I want to say.  And thank you. 
    THE PRESIDENT:  Thank you.  That’s great.  (Applause.)  Thank you very much. 
    Howard, please.  David.
    SECRETARY LUTNICK:  Sure.
    THE PRESIDENT:  Thank you. 
    SECRETARY LUTNICK:  So, I’m thrilled to be here today, because President Trump has made it a fundamental objective to bring semiconductor chip manufacturing home to America. 
    Under the Biden administration, TSMC received a $6 billion grant, and that encouraged them to build $65 billion.  So, America gave TSMC 10 percent of the money to build here.  And now you’re seeing the power of Donald Trump’s presidency, because TSMC, the greatest manufacturer of chips in the world, is coming to America with $100 billion investment.  And, of course, that is backed by the fact that they can come here because they can avoid paying tariffs. 
    So, the idea is: Come to America.  Build greatness in America.  Build for the American customers — the Apple, Nvidia, that whole list that Chairman Wei gave — in order to bring production to America. So, we’re really, really excited.  This continues the most incredible path you’ve ever seen, in these first weeks and months of the Trump administration, of incredible manufacturing coming to America.  The keys that the president has called out are coming here.  They’re coming here in huge size because they want to be in the greatest market in the world, and they want to avoid the tariffs that, if they’re not here, they’d have to suffer. 
    So, I want to congratulate C.C. Wei for bringing in this incredible $100 billion investment, but it’s on the shoulders of our president, Donald Trump, which is why he’s coming. 
    So, thank you.  
    THE PRESIDENT:  Thank you.
    David.  
    MR. SACKS:  Thank you, sir.  Well, the products that TSMC makes are literally the most important products in the world.  I mean, these advanced chips power everything.  They power AI.  They power your phone.  They power your cars.  And without them, the whole modern economy would stop, but they’re not made in the United States. 
    So, for TSMC to move here is a huge, huge development, and we owe that to President Trump’s leadership on the economy and Secretary Lutnick as well.  And, C.C., thank you for — for coming here. 
    Thank you.  Yeah.
    THE PRESIDENT:  Thank you, David. 
    So, thank you very much.  A big percentage of chips with this investment will be made now — a big percentage.  Worldwide, we had very little.  Almost none.  We used to have a lot with Intel.  But we had very little.  And we’ll be at close to 40 percent of the market with this transaction and a couple of others that we’re doing.  That’s a tremendous leap — like, a leap that nobody would have really said was possible. 
    So, I just want to thank you all for being here.  If you want a couple of questions.
    (Cross-talk.)
    Q    On the — 
    THE PRESIDENT:  Ideally on this subject. 
    Yes, please. 
    Q    — specific number of jobs it will create.   He said thousands —
    THE PRESIDENT:  They — yeah.
    Q    — but do you have a better —
    THE PRESIDENT:  They — you’re probably talking about 25,000 jobs.  But it’ll get bigger and bigger with time.  Knowing this gentleman, it’ll get bigger and bigger.  There’ll be no stopping him.  (Laughs.)
    Q    Mr. President, what more —
    THE PRESIDENT:  Yeah.  Brian, go ahead.
    Q    Right.  In addition to the jobs, you talked about national security, and that’s one thing I think a lot of Americans —
    THE PRESIDENT:  Yeah. 
    Q    — at home don’t understand.  Explain the national security aspect of this. 
    THE PRESIDENT:  Well, without the chips and semiconductors, nothing runs today.  You can’t buy a car without them.  You can’t get a radio, a television, nothing — you can’t get anything.  And we thought it was very important — obviously, business was, but we thought even to terms of national security, to have this large percentage of the chips, semiconductors, and other things that they make — the most important product, and not a product that you can really copy.  It takes years and years.  
    You’re on the needle of a pin is total genius.  I mean, they can put things — I mean, something the size of the needle, the point of a pin, they put information that is just not even believable. 
    So, if you would — 
    (Cross-talk.) 
    If you would see this, it’s just really something. 
    Yes, Brian. 
    Q    Can I — one — one more aspect to that.  Honda —
    THE PRESIDENT:  Yeah. 
    Q    — announced they’re coming to Indiana because of the tariffs.  Once again —
    THE PRESIDENT:  That’s right.
    Q    — you’re bringing additional jobs in manufacturing.  Do you want to comment on that as well?
    THE PRESIDENT:  Well, Honda is coming, and I told you about Apple, that they’re going to be starting to build massively here — $500 billion.  And we have many other companies.  It’s going to be announced, but we had many that have already announced.  And no, it’s going to be great.  It’s looking — it’s looking really strong.  I don’t think this country has ever seen anything like we’re seeing right now. 
    Now, the tariffs, as you know, it will start a week earlier than the reciprocal, which is going to be on — a couple of weeks earlier.  Reciprocal tariffs start on April 2nd.  And I wanted to make it April 1st, but I didn’t want to do — I didn’t want to go April Fool’s Day — (laughter) — because that cost me — that costs a lot of money, but — that one day.  So, we’re going April 2nd.
    But very importantly, tomorrow, tariffs — 25 percent on Canada and 25 percent on Mexico, and that’ll start.  So, they’re going to have to have a tariff.  So, what they’ll have to do is build their car plants, frankly, and other things in the United States — in which case, they have no tariffs.  In other words, you build — and this is exactly what Mr. Wei is doing by building here.  Otherwise, they’ll build — if they did them in Taiwan to send them here, they’ll have 25 percent or 30 percent or 50 percent or whatever the number may be someday.  It’ll go only up.  But by doing it here, he has no tariffs, so he’s way ahead of the game. 
    And I would just say this to people in Canada or Mexico, if they’re going to build car plants, the people that are doing them are much better off building here, because we have the market.  We’re the market where they sell the most.  
    And so, I think it’s going to be very exciting.  Very exciting for the automobile companies.  Very exciting for — I can think of any — as an example, North Carolina, they had the great — I used to go there to buy furniture for hotels, and it’s been wiped out.  That business all went to other countries, and now it’s all going to come back into North Carolina — the furniture manufacturing business.
    Please.  
    Q    Mr. President —
    Q    Is the Ukraine minerals deal now dead, or can it be revived?  What — what’s your —
    THE PRESIDENT:  Well, I’ll let you know.  We’re making a speech — you probably heard about it — tomorrow night, so I’ll let you know tomorrow night. 
    But, no, I don’t think so.  I think it’s — look, it’s a great deal for us, because, you know, Biden very, very, foolishly — stupidly, frankly — gave $300 billion and — $350 billion, more accurately — to a country to fight and to try and do things.  And you know what happened?  We get nothing.  We get nothing — just gave it. 
    We could have rebuilt our entire U.S. Navy with $350 billion.  Think of it.  Three hundred and fifty billion, we could have rebuilt our U.S. Navy.
    So, he gave it away as fast as the money could be gone.  And what we’re doing is getting that all back and a lot more than that.  And what we need — it’s very important for this business that we’re talking about here, with chips and semiconductors and everything else — we need rare earths.  And the deal we have is we have the finest rare earths that you can. 
    Q    Sir, on Ukraine.  Sir, on Ukraine.
         Q    Are you going to press back —
    Q    Thank you, Mr. President.  What do you need to see from President Zelenskyy to restart these negotiations?
    THE PRESIDENT:  Well, I just think he should be more appreciative, because this country has stuck with them through thick and thin.  We’ve given them much more than Europe, and Europe should have given more than us, because, as you know, that’s right there.  That’s the border. 
    This country really was like the fence on the border.  It was very important to Europe.  And I’m not knocking Europe, I’m saying they’re just — they were a lot smarter than Joe Biden, because Joe Biden didn’t have a clue.  He just gave money hand over a fist, and they should have been able to equalize with us. 
    In other words, if we gave a dollar, they should have given.  Well, we gave $350 billion.  They probably gave 100, but on top of it all, they get their money back, because they are doing it in the form of a loan, and it’s a secured loan.  
    So, when I saw that, which I’ve known about for a little while, I said, “It’s time for us to be smart.”  At the same time, it’s great for them, because they get us in the country taking the rare earth, which is going to fuel this big engine, and especially the engine that we’ve, in a very short time, created.  And we get something, and we’re in the — we’re there.  We have a presence there. 
    With all of that being said, I want one thing to happen: I want all of those young people to stop being killed.  They’re being killed by the thousands every single week.  Last week, 2,700 were killed.  Twenty-seven hundred young — in this case, just about, all young boys from Ukraine and from Russia.  And that’s not young people from the United States, but it’s on a human basis. 
    I want to see it stop.  The money is one thing, but the death.  And they’re losing thousands of soldiers a week, and that’s not including the people that get killed every time a town goes down or a missile goes into a town.
    (Cross-talk.)
    We — and — and I want to see it stop. 
    Yes.  
    Q    Mr. President, are you considering canceling military aid to Ukraine?  And can we get a reaction to what the Kremlin just said, that your administration is bringing U.S. worldview in alignment with Moscow’s?  
    THE PRESIDENT:  So, this is a deal that should have never happened.  This is a deal that would have never happened, and it didn’t happen — for four years, it didn’t happen.  It was never even close to happening.  If I were president, would not have happened.  And October 7th would have — would not have happened in Israel.  And inflation wouldn’t have happened. 
    And Afghanistan, disastrous — the way they withdrew — not the fact that they withdrew but the way they withdrew — would have never happened.  And we would have had Bagram right now instead of China having it.  It was one hour away from where China makes their nuclear weapons.  We would have kept Bagram — one of the biggest air bases in the world. 
    All of these things happened, and it’s a shame.  But it is what it is, and now we’re here.  I want to see it end fast.  I don’t want to see this go on for years and years.
    Now, President Zelenskyy supposedly made a statement today in AP — I’m not a big fan of AP, so maybe it was an incorrect statement — but he said he thinks the war is going to go on for a long time, and he better not be right about that.  That’s all I’ll say.
    Q    Mr. President, is there any —
         Q    Could this project — could this minimize the impact of the U.S. with chips should China decide to isolate Taiwan or China decide to take Taiwan? 
    THE PRESIDENT:  Well, it’s a very interesting point.  It’s a great question, actually.  But this would certainly — I can’t say “minimize.”  That would be a catastrophic event, obviously.  But it will at least give us a position where we have — in this very, very important business, we would have a very big part of it in the United States.  So, it would have a big impact if something should happen with Taiwan.
    Q    And with Russia sanctions, are you looking at relieving Russian sanctions if there is a peace deal?
    THE PRESIDENT:  Well, we’re going to make deals with everybody to get this war, including Europe and European nations.  And they’ve acted very well.  You know, they’re good people.  I know; most of them are friends of mine — the heads of state, the heads of the various countries, prime ministers from the different — I got four prime ministers and five presidents called me over the last two days, and they want to work it out.  They want to get it worked out.  
    And I think they’re also — you know, they’re talking money, but the money is less important than the deaths.  We’re talking thousands of young people a week.  And people would say why do I care about Ukraine, young people; why do I care about — and not all young, but they’re pretty young.  You know, Ukraine is running a little bit low, and they’re getting older.  They’re recruiting older people.  It’s a very, very sad thing that’s happening over there, and we want to get it finished.  We want to stop the death. 
    (Cross-talk.)
    Q    Mr. President, on the tariffs.  Is there any room left for Canada and Mexico to make a deal before midnight?  And should we expect those Chinese tariffs, the extra 10 percent to take effect tomorrow?
    THE PRESIDENT:  No room left for Mexico or for Canada.  No, the tariffs, you know, they’re all set.  They go into effect tomorrow.
    Q    Mr. President, just a follow-up on my colleague’s question.  Hearing —
    THE PRESIDENT:  And just so you understand, vast amounts of fentanyl have poured into our country from Mexico and, as you know, also from China, where it goes to Mexico and goes to Canada.  And China also had an additional 10, so it’s 10 plus 10.  
    And it comes in from Canada, and it comes in from Mexico, and that’s a very important thing to say.
    Yeah, please.  Go ahead.
    Q    Have you decided if you’re going to suspend military aid to Ukraine?  Have you made that decision?
    THE PRESIDENT:  Well, I haven’t even talked about that right now.  I mean, right now, we’ll see what happens.  A lot of things are happening right now, as we speak — I mean, literally as we speak.  I could give you an answer and go back to my office — the beautiful Oval Office.  I could go back into the Oval Office and find out that the answer is obsolete.
         It’s like his business.  It’s obsolete.  You come up with a new chip, and it’s obsolete about two minutes later, right?  But that’s what’s good about his business.  That’s why he’s the only one that’s successful in it.  But — 
         Q    And on tariffs, sir.
         Q    Mr. President, just to follow up my colleague’s question from Russia is saying that your foreign policy is largely in line with their vision.  Should that be concerning to Americans? 
    THE PRESIDENT:  Said what?
    Q    Should that be concerning to Americans?
    THE PRESIDENT:  Read the statement.
    Q    That Russia — Russia says that your administration’s foreign policy is, quote, “largely in line” with their vision.
    THE PRESIDENT:  Well, I tell you what, I think it takes two to tango, and you’re going to have to make a deal with Russia, and you’re going to have to make a deal with Ukraine.  You’re going to have to have the ascent, and you’re going to have to have the consent from the European nations, because I think that’s important, and from us. 
    I think everybody has to get into a room, so to speak, and we have to make a deal.  And the deal could be made very fast.  It should not be that hard a deal to make.  It could be made very fast. 
    Now, maybe somebody doesn’t want to make a deal, and if somebody doesn’t want to make a deal, I think that person won’t be around very long.  That person will not be listened to very long.  Because I believe that Russia wants to make a deal.  I believe, certainly, the people of Ukraine want to make a deal.  They’ve suffered more than anybody else.  We talk about suffering — they’ve suffered.
    But if you think about it, under President Bush, they got Georgia, right?  Russia got Georgia.  Under President Obama, they got a nice, big submarine base, a nice big chunk of land where they have their submarines.  You know that, right?  Crimea.  Under President Trump, they got nothing.  And under President O-Biden, they tried to get the whole thing.  They tried to get the whole big Ukraine, the whole thing.  If I didn’t get in here, they would’ve gotten the whole thing.  
    So, I can only say — you can go back to Bush, you go back to Obama, and go back to Biden — they took a lot.  The only one they didn’t get — you know what I gave them?  I gave them anti-tank missiles.  That’s what I gave them.  I gave them sanctions on Russia — on Russia.  I gave them Javelins.  You know the Javelins?  You know when they took out all those tanks?
    You know, the tanks were heading to Kyiv by the hundreds, and they were unstoppable, and I gave them Javelins. 
    So, you know, I really — Putin is the one that will tell you this has not been so good for them.  The fact is that I just want fairness.  I want fairness. 
    But think of it.  I gave Russia nothing except grief.  I gave them nothing.  I gave them sanctions and Javelins.  That’s what I gave them. 
    Obama gave them sheets.  And you heard that statement before.  It’s a very famous — Trump gave them Javelins, and Obama gave them sheets.  And then they say how close I am to Russia. 
    Let me tell you, we have to make a deal, because there are a lot of people being killed that shouldn’t be killed.  But remember, Trump gave them nothing, and the other presidents gave them a lot.  They gave them everything.
    Q    Mr. President, on trade.  You met with president — Argentine President Javier Milei at CPAC.  He wants to sign a free trade agreement —
    THE PRESIDENT:  Right. 
    Q    — with the United States.  Is that something that you would consider, even with Argentina, or any other country?
    THE PRESIDENT:  I’ll consider anything.  And Argentina — I think he’s great, by the way.  I think he’s a great leader.  He’s doing a great job.  He’s doing a fantastic job.  Brought it back from oblivion. 
    Yeah, we’ll look at things.  We’re looking at the UK with things.  It doesn’t have to be tariffs.  But tariffs are easy, they’re fast, they’re efficient, and they bring fairness. 
    For instance, when people kill their dollar, their equivalent of the dollar, whatever — whether it’s the yuan or the yen in Japan or the yuan in China — when they drop them down, that gives us — that puts us at a very unfair disadvantage.  So, all I have to do is say, “Howard, we’re going to have to raise the tariffs a little bit.”
    Because I’ve called President Xi, I’ve called the leaders of Japan to say, “You can’t continue to reduce and break down your currency.  You can’t do it, because it’s unfair to us.”  It’s very hard for us to make tractors — Caterpillar — here, when Japan, China, and other places are killing their currency, meaning driving it down. 
    So, all of these things add up, and the way you solve it very easily is with tariffs.  Because when they do that, instead of having to make phone calls every day, like I used to do with certain leaders — President Xi, a little bit — a lot of phone calls talking about the fact that they’re lowering their yuan.  They’re lowering it down.  And that makes it very, very hard for us. 
    So, this way, I just say, “Look, let them do that, and we make up for it with the tariffs.”  But —
    Q    Will you be speaking with Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum about tariffs today? 
    THE PRESIDENT:  Yeah, sure, I will.  I have a lot of respect for her.  I have a lot of respect for her. 
    (Cross-talk.) 
    Q    After the 10 percent tariff take ef- —
    THE PRESIDENT:  Yeah. 
    Q    — takes effect, it’ll be 20 percent on China now.  How high are you willing to go against China?
    THE PRESIDENT:  Well, I can’t say.  It depends on what they do with their currency.  It depends on what they do in terms of a retaliation with some kind of an economic retaliation, which I don’t think they’re going to retaliate too much.  
    Hey, look, the United States has been taken advantage of for 40 years.  The United States has been a laughing stock for years and years.  That’s why this gentleman has built in Taiwan, instead of building here.  It would have been better if he built here.  
    If we had a president that knew what they were doing — and we had a lot of them very bad on trade.  Look, I’m a huge fan of Ronald Reagan, but he was bad on trade.  Very bad on trade.  He allowed a lot of people, a lot of businesses, to be taken.  So, I say that with due respect, because I — he was so great on other things, but he was bad on trade. 
    We are setting records right now — records like nobody has ever seen before.  When you have companies like this coming in and almost 40 percent of their company, in one signature, is going to be devoted to what he does, which is one of the most important — important businesses in the world, that’s an unbelievable thing.  When Apple now is going to start building all of their plants here, all because of what we’ve done in terms of — it’s not because he likes me or they like me.  They don’t probably like me at all.  I don’t know.  I think he likes me a little bit, at least.  (Laughter.)
    MR. WEI:  No, I like you.
    THE PRESIDENT:  But you know what?  It’s the incentive we’ve created or the negative incentive.  I mean, it’s going to be very costly for people to take advantage of this country.  They can’t come in and steal our money and steal our jobs and take our factories and take our businesses and expect not to be punished, and they’re being punished by tariffs. 
    It’s a very powerful weapon that politicians haven’t used because they were either dishonest, stupid, or paid off in some other form.  And now we’re using them.
    Q    Have you spoken with President Xi?
    Q    Agriculture — 
    THE PRESIDENT:  Say it. 
    Q    Have you spoken with President Xi about this this term?
    THE PRESIDENT:  I don’t want to tell you that. 
    Q    On those incentives, sir.
    THE PRESIDENT:  Thank you very much, everybody. 
    (Cross-talk.) 
    Thank you.  Thank you very much.
                                 END                3:07 P.M. EST

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Australian Deputy PM: New centre to protect Fraser Coast turtles breaks ground

    Source: Minister of Infrastructure

    Work has started on the Fraser Coast Turtle Rehabilitation and Research Centre dedicated to the recovery of sick and injured marine turtles and vital research on the threats they face.

    Led by the University of the Sunshine Coast, the centre on the Hervey Bay foreshore will transform care for many at-risk marine turtles, removing the need to transport them several hours to receive life-saving treatment.

    More than 1,400 turtles have been rescued on the Fraser Coast over the past two years, with more than 300 needing specialist care at the nearest rehabilitation facility on the Sunshine Coast. 

    The project will retrofit existing buildings with a new fit-for-purpose facility including a specialist turtle life support system and indoor tanks to care for sick and injured sea turtles.

    The Centre will also be a hub for researchers investigating the general health of marine life across the wider region, and the emerging threats they face, including a deadly “soft shell syndrome”, which is plaguing the local turtle population.

    The Australian Government is providing $250,000 funding for the works with the Queensland Government allocating $1.17 million.

    Quotes attributable to Federal Assistant Minister for Regional Development, Anthony Chisholm:

    “Queensland is home to some of the world’s most diverse marine wildlife and this $250,000 investment will help safeguard the Fraser Coast’s turtle populations for future generations.

    “This facility will also boost the local economy with an estimated 15 jobs set to be created, along with students, researchers and tourists all set to walk through its doors, which benefits the entire region.”

    Quotes attributable to Queensland Deputy Premier and Minister for State Development, Infrastructure and Planning, Jarrod Bleijie:

    “We’re proud to partner with the University of Sunshine Coast to deliver this critical infrastructure on the Hervey Bay foreshore. 

    “Queenslanders voted for a fresh start and the State Government is committed to partnering with local government to deliver local projects that create jobs, provide long-term economic benefits and improve the lifestyle of Queenslanders no matter where they live.”

    Quotes attributable to Fraser Coast Mayor, George Seymour:

    “This facility will benefit the region’s wildlife, university students and the broader community, including Butchulla traditional owners.

    “This is an excellent partnership between all three levels of government, community groups and the University of the Sunshine Coast.

    “The turtles are an endangered species, so it is important that we research what has been happening to the local population that has caused the large number of fatalities and casualties.”

    Quotes attributable to University of the Sunshine Coast Vice-Chancellor and President, Professor Helen Bartlett 

    “We are pleased to formally announce the name for the new centre, which will give our threatened turtles the greatest opportunity for survival, is the ‘UniSC Milbi Centre – Sea Turtle Research and Rehabilitation’. 

    “Milbi is the Butchulla word for sea turtle and the Dayman Park site where the centre is located holds great cultural significance for the Butchulla people and their deep connection with the Milbi and other sea and land creatures. 

    “This is reflected in the design and operation of the centre, where Butchulla Land and Sea Rangers will help to care for rescued sea turtles on country, and science and Indigenous knowledge will combine to fill gaps in our local and global understanding of marine turtles.

    “Six of the world’s seven species of marine turtles are found in the region – all listed as vulnerable or endangered – and are ecologically and genetically linked to other parts of Australia and the wider Pacific region.

    “To rescue and care for marine turtles is vitally important, as is research to better understand the cause of strandings and deaths, and to increase their chances of survival once they are rehabilitated and returned safely to the sea. 

    “This centre will be a hub for vital research that will help to inform local, state, national and international responses to mitigate threats to marine turtles, including disease and climate change.

    “Ongoing funding support from governments, organisations and the community is vital for our endangered sea turtles.”

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI Australia: New centre to protect Fraser Coast turtles breaks ground

    Source: Australian Ministers for Regional Development

    Work has started on the Fraser Coast Turtle Rehabilitation and Research Centre dedicated to the recovery of sick and injured marine turtles and vital research on the threats they face.

    Led by the University of the Sunshine Coast, the centre on the Hervey Bay foreshore will transform care for many at-risk marine turtles, removing the need to transport them several hours to receive life-saving treatment.

    More than 1,400 turtles have been rescued on the Fraser Coast over the past two years, with more than 300 needing specialist care at the nearest rehabilitation facility on the Sunshine Coast. 

    The project will retrofit existing buildings with a new fit-for-purpose facility including a specialist turtle life support system and indoor tanks to care for sick and injured sea turtles.

    The Centre will also be a hub for researchers investigating the general health of marine life across the wider region, and the emerging threats they face, including a deadly “soft shell syndrome”, which is plaguing the local turtle population.

    The Australian Government is providing $250,000 funding for the works with the Queensland Government allocating $1.17 million.

    Quotes attributable to Federal Assistant Minister for Regional Development, Anthony Chisholm:

    “Queensland is home to some of the world’s most diverse marine wildlife and this $250,000 investment will help safeguard the Fraser Coast’s turtle populations for future generations.

    “This facility will also boost the local economy with an estimated 15 jobs set to be created, along with students, researchers and tourists all set to walk through its doors, which benefits the entire region.”

    Quotes attributable to Queensland Deputy Premier and Minister for State Development, Infrastructure and Planning, Jarrod Bleijie:

    “We’re proud to partner with the University of Sunshine Coast to deliver this critical infrastructure on the Hervey Bay foreshore. 

    “Queenslanders voted for a fresh start and the State Government is committed to partnering with local government to deliver local projects that create jobs, provide long-term economic benefits and improve the lifestyle of Queenslanders no matter where they live.”

    Quotes attributable to Fraser Coast Mayor, George Seymour:

    “This facility will benefit the region’s wildlife, university students and the broader community, including Butchulla traditional owners.

    “This is an excellent partnership between all three levels of government, community groups and the University of the Sunshine Coast.

    “The turtles are an endangered species, so it is important that we research what has been happening to the local population that has caused the large number of fatalities and casualties.”

    Quotes attributable to University of the Sunshine Coast Vice-Chancellor and President, Professor Helen Bartlett 

    “We are pleased to formally announce the name for the new centre, which will give our threatened turtles the greatest opportunity for survival, is the ‘UniSC Milbi Centre – Sea Turtle Research and Rehabilitation’. 

    “Milbi is the Butchulla word for sea turtle and the Dayman Park site where the centre is located holds great cultural significance for the Butchulla people and their deep connection with the Milbi and other sea and land creatures. 

    “This is reflected in the design and operation of the centre, where Butchulla Land and Sea Rangers will help to care for rescued sea turtles on country, and science and Indigenous knowledge will combine to fill gaps in our local and global understanding of marine turtles.

    “Six of the world’s seven species of marine turtles are found in the region – all listed as vulnerable or endangered – and are ecologically and genetically linked to other parts of Australia and the wider Pacific region.

    “To rescue and care for marine turtles is vitally important, as is research to better understand the cause of strandings and deaths, and to increase their chances of survival once they are rehabilitated and returned safely to the sea. 

    “This centre will be a hub for vital research that will help to inform local, state, national and international responses to mitigate threats to marine turtles, including disease and climate change.

    “Ongoing funding support from governments, organisations and the community is vital for our endangered sea turtles.”

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Transport – EMA backs congestion charging as Auckland’s traffic woes worsen

    Source: EMA

    The release today of a study on congestion in Auckland adds to the urgency around the introduction of time of use charging, says the Employers and Manufacturers Association (EMA).
    Auckland’s Cost of Congestion white paper, released by Mayor Wayne Brown, found congestion will cost Auckland $2.6 billion a year by 2026 – factoring in the cost of lost time, as well as impacts like reduced business investment and consumer spending.
    EMA Head of Advocacy Alan McDonald says there finally seems to be the political will to implement time of use charging in New Zealand’s largest city.
    The government’s Time of Use Charging Bill will be read in Parliament this month, and Auckland’s Mayor has come out strongly in support.
    “The EMA has long advocated for time of use charging as it will help maximise the use of existing motorway and arterial corridors around the slowly choking greater city area,” says McDonald.
    “The EMA commissioned NZIER to conduct a similar survey in 2019, which put the cost of congestion to Auckland’s economy at up to $1.3 billion annually.
    “Things have clearly gotten worse.
    “The local traffic modelling in the new report shows Aucklanders now sit in traffic for 29 million hours a year.
    “Congestion charging is intended to reduce this traffic and introduce more certainty into travel times on our roading network, but it will also improve air quality and help to fund public transport.
    “This means that allowing businesses and tradespeople who need their vehicles to effectively deliver goods and services around the city will have flow-on effects.
    “There are also social benefits for residents who need their vehicles to make doctor’s appointments or drop kids at sport practices.
    “Moves to charge commuters who travel at peak times will encourage many to use public transport and help the city derive maximum benefit from the City Rail Link when it comes online in early 2026.”
    In central London, congestion charging was introduced in 2003 and has helped cut traffic by around 15%.
    In Stockholm, where congestion charging was introduced in 2007, it has reduced traffic within the city centre by about 20%.
    “Congestion charging has been shown to work around the world and the case for implementing it in Auckland grows by the day,” says McDonald.
    “It’s time to put a solid case to residents that time of use charging has social as well as business benefits.
    “It needs to be done right, but it also needs to be done with some urgency if we are going to unlock productivity in New Zealand.”

    MIL OSI New Zealand News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Durbin, Senate Judiciary Democrats Press Justice Department On Diversion Of Law Enforcement To Purported Immigration Enforcement Initiative

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Illinois Dick Durbin

    March 03, 2025

    Under the guise of “enhanced immigration enforcement efforts,” Donald Trump and Pam Bondi continue to weaken the Department’s national security and public safety capabilities by reallocating vital resources, reassigning career officials, and purging longtime civil servants

    WASHINGTON – U.S. Senate Democratic Whip Dick Durbin (D-IL), Ranking Member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, led all Senate Judiciary Committee Democrats in pressing Attorney General Pam Bondi on her reallocation of resources from mission-critical Department of Justice (DOJ) projects to purported “immigration enforcement initiatives.”

    The Justice Department recently issued a directive to take legal action against so-called “sanctuary cities,” demanded an increase in immigration-related prosecutions, and reallocated resources away from critical national security and public safety efforts. The Senators request that Attorney General Bondi rescind this memo.

    The Senators begin by summarizing how the directive undermines our country’s national security and public safety capabilities, writing: “We are alarmed at recent changes within the Department of Justice (DOJ) that have significantly destabilized the agency and made America less safe. The shortsighted removal or reassignment of senior career DOJ and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) officials with national security expertise have diminished the country’s ability to respond to national security or public safety threats. We ask that you rescind the January 21, 2025, Memorandum and reverse any personnel decisions that diverted resources away from the Department’s critical national security and public safety missions.”

    The Senators then criticize the January 21, 2025, memo’s broad directive to divert resources away from vital law enforcement activities to vague immigration enforcement efforts, writing: “We are deeply disturbed that the Department is redirecting resources from the prosecution of violent crimes to the pursuit of dubious claims against so-called ‘sanctuary’ jurisdictions. Multiple studies have shown that localities that limit cooperation with federal immigration enforcement do not have higher crime rates.  Reassigning law enforcement officers to ill-defined immigration-focused initiatives, for which they have no expertise, and instructing prosecutors to investigate and potentially pursue charges against sanctuary jurisdictions will not successfully target those who pose an actual threat to public safety. These reassignments drain law enforcement resources from critical missions and create an experience and leadership vacuum in our national security, counterintelligence, and public safety apparatus.”

    The brain drain of the Department’s senior expertise is so severe that all the career officials who attended the daily threats session for years have been removed from their positions, per public reporting. A large number of officials have been reassigned to a newly created “Sanctuary City Enforcement Working Group,” despite the attorneys having no experience in immigration law and the group having no enforcement or litigation authority, which led to forced multiple resignations by veteran attorneys.

    Other reported efforts underway reallocate valuable government resources from critical missions to immigration enforcement matters, including from efforts to fight transnational-organized crime, violent crime, drug trafficking, and terrorism.

    The Senators then outline the disruption caused by the resource reallocation, writing: “The sweeping changes to personnel assignments and resource allocation across DOJ will lead to widespread disruption and delay in prosecutions, investigations, and sensitive operations… It is irresponsible and dangerous to divert DOJ and FBI law enforcement officials from their primary missions and areas of expertise to bolster the Trump Administration’s mass deportation effort.”

    The Senators conclude with a request to rescind the January 21, 2025, memo, before making a series of information requests with a deadline of March 17, 2025, writing: “DOJ’s extensive focus on immigration enforcement, to the detriment of other vital national security and public safety priorities, intentionally diverts the Department’s resources and will fail to actually move the needle on immigration enforcement. Personnel at DOJ, the FBI, and other component agencies are now limited in their ability to combat threats to public safety and national security, and a dedicated and talented workforce is facing a crisis of morale. To that end, we ask that you rescind the January 21, 2025, Memorandum and reverse any personnel decisions that diverted resources away from critical national security and public safety missions.”

    In addition to Durbin, the letter is signed by U.S. Senators Mazie Hirono (D-HI), Chris Coons (D-DE), Richard Blumenthal (D-CT), Amy Klobuchar (D-MN), Adam Schiff (D-CA), Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI), Cory Booker (D-NJ), Peter Welch (D-VT), and Alex Padilla (D-CA).

    For a PDF copy of the letter sent to Attorney General Pam Bondi, click here.

    -30-

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Durbin, Wyden, Kishnamoorthi Introduce Legislation To Reduce Tobacco Use In America

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Illinois Dick Durbin

    March 03, 2025

    The End Tobacco Loopholes Act would establish a new federal e-cigarette tax, increase tobacco tax rate, & close tax loopholes

    WASHINGTON—U.S. Senate Democratic Whip Dick Durbin (D-IL), U.S. Senator Ron Wyden (D-OR), U.S. Representative Raja Krishnamoothi (D-IL-08), and several Senate Democratic colleagues today introduced the End Tobacco Loopholes Act, legislation that would close tax code loopholes for tobacco products to lower tobacco use and reduce health care spending.  The legislation would establish a federal tax on e-cigarettes as 30 states have done, update the federal cigarette tax rate for the first time in more than 15 years to restore its public health impact, and harmonize the tax rate across tobacco products to address gamesmanship by manufacturers.  Increasing the price of tobacco products has been found to be the single most effective way to reduce tobacco use, particularly among children.

    “Big Tobacco’s deadly profit scheme relies on addicting children.  Our most effective strategy to reduce smoking and prevent a new generation from becoming addicted is to price these dangerous tobacco products out of the reach of children.  But federal law has not been updated in 16 years, creating loopholes that Big Tobacco has used to hook kids,” Durbin said.  “The End Tobacco Loopholes Act would help reduce tobacco and e-cigarette use, save billions in health care costs, and improve the health of children for generations to come.”

    “Big Tobacco is driving addiction, particularly among young people, and raking in the profits,” Wyden said. “This bill is about the health and safety of young people in America and accountability for the tobacco industry. Closing tax loopholes on tobacco products and setting the right policies to discourage their use is a public health no-brainer.”

    “Big Tobacco has systematically targeted Americans and their children with advertising for decades, first with cigarettes, now with e-cigarettes and vaping products,” Krishnamoorthi said.  “Unless we begin taxing e-cigarettes like other addictive products, Big Tobacco will continue to hitch future generations of Americans to a lifetime of addiction and health issues.  To properly end the youth vaping crisis, it’s time to make Big Tobacco pay its fair share and hit them where it matters: their bottom line.”

    Joining Durbin, Wyden, and Krishnamoorthi in introducing today’s bill are U.S. Senators Patty Murray (D-WA), Jack Reed (D-RI), Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Richard Blumenthal (D-CT), and Ed Markey (D-MA).

    The End Tobacco Loopholes Act would close tax code loopholes for tobacco products by increasing the federal tax rate on cigarettes, pegging it to inflation to ensure it remains an effective public health tool, and setting the federal tax rate for all other tobacco products at this same level.  While e-cigarettes are the most commonly used tobacco product among youth, and are now subject to the full regulatory framework of the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) Premarket Tobacco Product Applications, they are not subject to federal taxes—which has created an effective price discount that has contributed to the explosion of youth use of e-cigarettes.  The End Tobacco Loopholes Act would follow the lead of 30 states and Washington, D.C. that have set their own state taxes, by setting a federal tax on these vaping products.  The legislation also closes numerous tax and regulatory loopholes that the tobacco industry has exploited for large cigars, smokeless tobacco, and pipe tobacco by shifting production and sale schemes to avoid taxes and oversight, resulting in nearly $4 billion in lost federal revenue between 2009 and 2018.  In addition, large cigars, smokeless tobacco, and pipe tobacco remain dramatically undertaxed compared to cigarettes, at a time when their use—especially among youth—is trending at a comparable rate to cigarettes. 

    Tobacco is the leading cause of preventable death, annually accounting for 480,000 deaths—or 1 out of every 5 deaths—in America.  Nearly one-third of the middle and high school students using tobacco products use two or more tobacco products.  Tobacco use costs more than $600 billion a year, including $241 billion in direct medical care, 60 percent of which is paid through government programs such as Medicare and Medicaid, and $365 billion in lost productivity. 

    The Institute of Medicine, U.S. Surgeon General, and World Health Organization have determined that increasing the price of tobacco products is the single most effective way to reduce tobacco use, with studies showing a 10 percent cigarette price increase results in a three-five percent reduction in consumption.

    The End Tobacco Loopholes Act of 2025 is endorsed by Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, American Lung Association, American Heart Association, American Academy of Pediatrics, Parents Against Vaping, and American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network.

    -30-

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Cornyn, Coons Introduce Bill to Strengthen State Department’s Taiwan Strategy

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Texas John Cornyn
    WASHINGTON – U.S. Senators John Cornyn (R-TX) and Chris Coons (D-DE) today introduced the Taiwan Assurance Implementation Act to require the U.S. Department of State to review and update its policy guidance regarding Taiwan no less than every five years and deliver a report to Congress within 90 days in light of the rapidly changing geopolitical landscape and threats of an invasion by China:
    “The threat China poses to the stability of the Indo-Pacific, including our friend and ally Taiwan, is ever-evolving, and our diplomatic guidance must be able to keep up,” said Sen. Cornyn. “This legislation would help reinstate a strong Taiwan strategy at the State Department at a time when we need it most.”
    “Our commitment to Taiwan must be backed by an approach that evolves with the changing realities in the Indo-Pacific,” said Sen. Coons. “The Taiwan Assurance Implementation Act recognizes the importance of United States-Taiwan relations, supports our shared values, and reinforces stability in this critical region, consistent with our longstanding one China policy.” 

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Booker Statement on Vote Against Linda McMahon as Secretary of Education

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for New Jersey Cory Booker
    WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, U.S. Senator Cory Booker (D-NJ) issued the following statement:
    “The role of Secretary of Education demands someone with experience and a deep commitment to ensuring that every child, regardless of their background, has access to a high-quality education.
    “The Trump administration has made their plan to dismantle the Department of Education clear. If confirmed, Ms. McMahon would be leading the charge to destroy a critical entity that helps distribute federal funds that helps ensure that all students, including those in low-income communities, students with disabilities, students of color and English language learners, have equal access to a quality education. The impacts of eliminating the Department would be detrimental to our teachers, our students, and our country as a whole. As Secretary of Education, Ms. McMahon would decrease access to higher education, raise student loan payments, and weaken civil rights protections for students while using the Office for Civil Rights to promote a far-right political agenda. In New Jersey and across the nation, Ms. McMahon’s plans to cut funding for Title I and IDEA would have damaging impacts on public schools, particularly for low-income and disabled students. Dismantling the Department will make the very real challenges we face, including inadequate school funding, teacher shortages, and declines in student performance, even harder to overcome.
    “Ms. McMahon’s confirmation hearing was deeply concerning. She failed to provide clear answers on whether teaching African American history courses would violate Trump’s executive order on ‘radical indoctrination,’ or whether student organizations like ‘Special Olympics’ and ‘Jewish Student Association’ could put schools at risk of losing federal funding under Trump’s policies. Additionally, she failed to display knowledge of the education laws she would be responsible for enforcing. I am deeply skeptical of her ability to lead the Department of Education effectively. 
    “For these reasons, I will be voting against Ms. McMahon for Secretary of Education.”

    MIL OSI USA News