NewzIntel.com

Category: Politics

  • MIL-OSI: How to easily earn USD at home: Cloud mining to easily earn cryptocurrencies

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Monmouthshire, UK, March 02, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Alr Miner, a leading AI cloud mining platform, is making waves in the cryptocurrency industry by offering a limited-time $12 login mining bonus to new users. The program is designed to lower the barrier to entry for cryptocurrency enthusiasts and provide a seamless, cost-effective way to start earning Bitcoin through cloud mining.

    What is Cloud Mining?

    Cloud mining is an effective method that makes cloud mining a remote mining of cryptocurrencies, including Bitcoin mining. With this method, you can make cloud mining profitable in the following ways: borrow the mining power of cloud mining companies to avoid personal investment in hardware and maintenance; use powerful computers to access large mining farms, tirelessly solve cryptographic puzzles and receive cryptocurrency rewards.

    Alr Miner: Where laziness meets profit

    Alr Miner takes cloud mining simplicity to the highest level, making it perfect for newbies. The platform’s user-friendly interface ensures that even cryptocurrency newbies can navigate it with ease.For Alr Miner, laziness is not a shortcoming; it is the path to success. As a pioneer in providing cloud mining services, Alr Miner has more than 100 mining farms around the world, with more than 100,000 mining equipment, all using new energy and renewable cycle power generation. With its stable income and security, it has won the recognition of more than 6.9 million users.

    Incredible earning opportunities

    What makes Alr Miner different is its extraordinary daily passive income. Offering the opportunity to earn $10,800 or more per day, Alr Miner enables users to realize their dream of getting rich online. Imagine earning a substantial income without constant effort or complicated setup – that’s what Alr Miner offers.

    Safety sustainability

    In the world of mining, trust and security are of paramount importance. Alr Miner understands this and puts user safety first. Alr Miner is committed to transparency and legality, ensuring that your investment is protected, allowing you to focus on gaining profits. All mines use clean energy electricity, making cloud mining carbon neutral. Renewable energy prevents environmental pollution and has super high returns, allowing every investor to enjoy opportunities and benefits.

    Alr Miner Platform Advantages:

    1: Cutting-edge equipment: We use mining equipment provided by top mining machine manufacturers such as Bitmain, Antminer, and JuNeng Combination Miner to ensure the stable operation and efficient production capacity of Bitcoin mining machines.

    2: Legality and global audience: The platform was legally established in the UK in 2018, protected and issued by the UK government, and has attracted more than 6.9 million real users worldwide with cutting-edge technology.

    3: Intuitive Interface: The platform’s user-friendly interface ensures that even crypto newbies can navigate with ease.

    4: Support a variety of popular cryptocurrencies: such as DOGE, BTC, ETH, USDC, USDT, BCH, LTC, XRP, SOL, etc. for settlement.

    5: Stable income: The contracts launched by the platform generate income every 24 hours, and the principal will be automatically returned after the contract expires.

    6: Professional team: The platform has an experienced IT team and 24/7 real-time customer service team support to ensure that users can solve problems in a timely manner.

    7: Affiliate Program: Allows you to refer friends and get a referral bonus of up to $60,000.

    How to join Alr Miner:1: Sign up now to get a $12 bonus ($0.60 for daily check-ins).2: Choose a contract: After successfully registering, the next step is to choose a mining contract that suits your goals and budget. Alr Miner offers a variety of contracts to suit different needs, whether you are a beginner or an experienced miner. Take a close look at the available options, considering factors such as contract length, potential returns, and associated costs.3: Start Profiting: Once you have selected and activated your mining contract, you can sit back and let the system do the work for you. Alr Miner’s advanced technology ensures that your mining operation runs efficiently, maximizing your potential earnings.Choose the contract that suits your investment strategy:

    Affiliate Program

    Now, Alr Miner also launched an affiliate program, a platform where you can earn money by recommending the site to other people. You can start earning money even without investing. After inviting a certain number of active referrals, you will receive a one-time fixed bonus of up to $60,000. With unlimited referrals, your earning potential is unlimited too!

    In short

    If you are looking for ways to increase your passive income, cloud mining is a great way to do it. If used correctly, these opportunities can help you grow your cryptocurrency wealth in “autopilot” mode with minimal time investment.At the very least, they should take less time than any type of active trading. Passive income is the goal of every investor and trader, and with  Alr Miner, you can maximize your passive income potential easier than ever before.

    If you want to know more about Alr Miner, please visit its official website

    Disclaimer: The information provided in this press release is not a solicitation for investment, nor is it intended as investment advice, financial advice, or trading advice. Cryptocurrency mining and staking involve risk. There is potential for loss of funds. It is strongly recommended you practice due diligence, including consultation with a professional financial advisor, before investing in or trading cryptocurrency and securities.

    Olivia Miller 
    Marketing Manager
    Alr Miner
    +44 7514 226545
    info(at)alrminer.com

    https://t.me/Alrminer

    The MIL Network –

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: PM meeting with Prime Minister Meloni of Italy: 2 March 2025

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    News story

    PM meeting with Prime Minister Meloni of Italy: 2 March 2025

    The Prime Minister met Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni in Downing Street this morning.

    The Prime Minister met Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni in Downing Street this morning, their third meeting since July. The meeting came ahead of the Prime Minister convening international leaders in London today to discuss how partners can work with the USA to move forward to a lasting peace for a sovereign Ukraine. They agreed on the importance of the transatlantic alliance in confronting shared challenges.

    They had a warm and constructive discussion, agreeing the strength of the UK-Italy relationship is as vital now as it has ever been. They reaffirmed their support for Ukraine, agreeing that the UK and Italy will stand with them for as long as it takes. 

    The two leaders acknowledged positive progress made since their last meeting in joint working to tackle irregular migration. They agreed secure borders are a bedrock of a secure economy. They noted the significance of recent successful joint operations to disrupt smuggling gangs and agreed there is greater opportunity to disrupt gangs upstream at source when countries work together. They will strengthen cooperation to share intelligence and data, such as through Europol. The Prime Ministers committed to continue to work closely together in these areas. 

    The two Prime Ministers committed to staying in close contact to take today’s discussion forward at pace.

    Updates to this page

    Published 2 March 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom –

  • MIL-OSI Global: Soaring U.S. egg prices and millions of dead chickens signal the deep problems and risks in modern poultry production

    Source: The Conversation – Canada – By Tony Weis, Professor of Geography and Environment, Western University

    The recent volatility of egg prices in the United States has been a hot topic. Media coverage has consistently made the connection between supply problems and virulent strains of avian flu that has been afflicting poultry birds since 2022.

    Many articles have indicated that, in addition to millions of birds dying from avian flu, infected flocks have widely been killed en masse in an attempt to contain its spread. The livestock industry euphemistically calls this killing of infected animals “depopulation,” and around 150 million birds have been depopulated since the current crisis began.

    I have studied industrial livestock production for many years and have seen its myriad problems flash in and out of the media — such as greenhouse gas emissions, air and water pollution, food-borne illnesses, labour exploitation, and animal suffering. But it’s rare for the sector to stay in the media for long.

    The unusually heavy media coverage of expensive eggs, depopulated chickens and avian flu has highlighted some of the deep problems and risks of modern poultry production. Unfortunately, however, important context and dynamics have been regularly omitted.

    Unpacking key omissions helps to better understand both the nature of these chronic risks of infectious disease and the perilous response of the Trump administration.

    The spotlight on avian flu

    Multiple strains of avian flu chronically circulate within populations of both wild and domesticated birds. Avian flu is prone to frequent mutations, and occasionally some strains become more virulent and spillover across species.

    In addition to the problems avian flu in poultry production, recent media coverage has also highlighted the virus’s broader dangers.

    Avian flu is currently ravaging many wild animal species around the world, reaching into extremely remote places and even zoos.

    In the U.S., avian flu recently spilled over into cattle — causing widespread illness after a mutation enabled intra-species transmission.

    Avian flu has also caused a small number of severe human illnesses in the U.S. (primarily workers in poultry operations). Although no human-to-human transmission is evident — a necessary condition for a pandemic — this potential remains a grave threat.

    Key issues underplayed

    Although the media coverage of egg prices, depopulated chickens and avian flu has cast a valuable spotlight on many aspects of modern poultry production, it has also tended to leave out some important elements.

    Mentions in the media of many millions of chickens being killed to contain the spread of avian flu will surely sound jarring to some. But such figures pale in comparison to the 9.5 billion chickens slaughtered annually in the U.S. and the 76 billion slaughtered annually worldwide.

    Poultry birds now comprise 70 per cent of the total biomass of all birds on earth. Most are produced in densely-packed operations where reproduction, life and death have been greatly accelerated.

    Modern chickens have been selectively bred to either put on weight (broilers) or produce eggs (layers) very quickly. Broilers reach slaughter weight in a mere six weeks. Layer hens produce nearly an egg a day for about a year or two, before being slaughtered. These short life-cycles are rarely mentioned in coverage of depopulations.

    The growing risk of avian flu mutations relate to both enormity of poultry bird populations — by far the biggest habitat for the virus — and the unhealthy conditions of life in large enclosures.

    According to the U.S. Census of Agriculture, over 97 per cent of layers live in operations with at least 10,000 birds. Over 99 per cent of broilers are grown in operations with annual sales of at least 100,000 birds.

    This scale also relates to a question that has, with a few notable exceptions, received scant coverage: since infected populations cannot simply be shipped to the slaughterhouse, how are the birds actually killed?

    A leading approach to depopulation is ventilation shutdown. This involves turning off the powerful fans needed to make the ambient conditions in large enclosures bearable, and results in agonizing deaths.

    Researchers are investigating ways to augment ventilation shutdown as part of a broader research agenda seeking to develop systematic ways to depopulate large operations. This agenda clearly illustrates that the livestock industry is acutely aware of the great risks of infectious disease evolution within these spaces.

    Undermining infectious disease surveillance

    In the 2024 election campaign, Republicans regularly pointed to high egg prices in efforts to highlight rising inflation. In early 2025, the continuing rise of egg prices has cast a glare on U.S. President Donald Trump’s failed promise to immediately solve inflation.

    In response to scrutiny, the Trump administration initially tried to blame Biden for the depopulation of chickens. While such deflection might work for a time, Trump and his advisors realize they need a strategy to increase egg supplies.

    This emerging strategy must be viewed in relation to Trump’s sweeping assault on state institutions and regulations — which includes undermining crucial capacity for infectious disease surveillance. Trump made immediate cuts to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and forced it to disengage with the World Health Organization. He has also promised big cuts to the National Institutes of Health.

    In this context, it’s unsurprising that Trump is laying out a simple plan to increase the egg supply: rebuilding layer populations, reducing depopulations and trusting the livestock and pharmaceutical industries to find ways of containing avian flu — likely through vaccines and strengthened biosecurity.

    It’s profoundly irrational to be weakening infectious disease surveillance in the midst of the current avian flu crisis (and amid mounting infectious disease risks more generally).
    It’s also hard to fathom how further empowering the leading actors in poultry production can be expected to resolve the risks of avian flu that are so bound up in the nature of modern production.

    Pursuing this course might temporarily bring egg prices down, but it also inevitably means passing untold risks into the future.

    Tony Weis does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    – ref. Soaring U.S. egg prices and millions of dead chickens signal the deep problems and risks in modern poultry production – https://theconversation.com/soaring-u-s-egg-prices-and-millions-of-dead-chickens-signal-the-deep-problems-and-risks-in-modern-poultry-production-249679

    MIL OSI – Global Reports –

  • MIL-OSI Global: The Canada Carbon Rebate is still widely misunderstood — here’s why

    Source: The Conversation – Canada – By Ruolz Ariste, Adjunct Professor, School of Public Policy and Administration, Carleton University

    As Canada’s federal parties gear up for the upcoming federal election, one of the key issues on the campaign trail will be how Canada will meet its climate policy targets.

    Several strategies exist to meet these targets, including: a border charge on imports, a border rebate for exports, a domestic output-based subsidy or a consumer-based carbon rebate like the Canada Carbon Rebate (CCR).

    The CCR, introduced by Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s administration to curb carbon emissions, is designed to offset the costs of carbon pricing by providing rebates to households.



    Read more:
    The upcoming election is a critical juncture for Canada’s carbon tax and climate policies

    However, both leading candidates for Liberal Party leadership, Mark Carney and Chrystia Freeland, have said they will drop the CCR if elected. Carney has proposed replacing it with a green incentive program, while Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre has been a vocal opponent of the CCR altogether.

    The debate surrounding the CCR is crucial, as carbon pricing is the most effective measure to reduce greenhouse gas emissions when paired with accompanying measures. Yet, despite its effectiveness, Canada’s major political parties are willing to scrap it because it’s not politically rewarding.

    CCR is widely misunderstood

    The CCR is widely misunderstood in Canada, leading to misleading narratives about its economic and environmental impacts.

    A recent report from the Parliamentary Budget Office (PBO) argues that industries facing pollution charges could become less competitive because of the CCR, potentially increasing Canada’s federal budget deficit by $4 billion by 2030, and making Canadians worse off.

    Similarly, a Fraser Institute report argues Canada’s global emission footprint is too small for the CCR to make a difference, even if environmental benefits are accounted for.

    However, these reports fail to fully assess the impacts of carbon pricing and risk distorting the debate and influencing policy in ways that could weaken Canada’s climate strategy.

    Yet an overlooked crucial fact in the debate on the CCR is that 80 per cent of Canadian families received more in rebates than they paid in pollution pricing in 2024 because major polluters bear the highest costs under the system.

    The missing perspective in assessments

    While the PBO’s report may be valid from a business standpoint, the report didn’t run a full cost-benefit analysis, which would have weighed both the economic costs and the social benefits of reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

    In climate policy, the social perspective is much more important than the business one. Without this context, reports like the PBO’s risk being misinterpreted, particularly by politicians opposed to climate action. This could have significant negative consequences for environmental policy in Canada.



    Read more:
    The carbon tax needs fixing, not axing — Canada needs a progressive carbon tax

    A major issue in economic assessments is that the benefits of greenhouse gas reduction are typically excluded because they extend beyond national borders. As a result, emissions reduction can appear to be a poor investment, when in reality, its global and long-term benefits far outweigh the initial expenses.

    The Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat’s cost-benefit guide acknowledges this issue. Under normal circumstances, global benefits should be excluded in cost-benefit analysis. However, given the nature of climate change, the guide states that the costs and benefits of greenhouse gas reductions — calculated using the social cost of greenhouse gas — are appropriate to include in cost-benefit analysis.

    A recent UN report supports this approach, estimating that while global carbon policy measures could cost more than US$1 trillion annually, the economic benefits will be far greater. Shifting to a green economy could yield US$26 trillion by 2030, compared to maintaining business as usual.

    Carbon leakage challenge

    A major challenge for Canada’s carbon pricing strategy is that many of its key trading partners don’t impose similar emissions pricing on consumers.

    For example, the United States and China don’t, even though they are the world’s two biggest polluters. While some jurisdictions, like California’s Cap-and-Trade Program and China’s national emissions trading system, have introduced emissions regulations, these programs are not as widespread as Canada’s.

    This imbalance puts Canadian producers at a competitive disadvantage. In response, some businesses may choose to move their production operations to countries with weaker environmental regulations to avoid higher carbon pricing in Canada — a phenomenon known as “carbon leakage.”

    Instead of reducing emissions, this carbon leakage simply shifts emissions elsewhere, undermining global efforts to address climate change. To counter this, there has been a growing interest in policies designed to prevent this from happening, such as border carbon adjustments.

    This issue is critical to Canada’s ability to meet its climate policy targets. Without effective measures to prevent carbon leakage, the country could face higher costs and less impact on global emissions reduction efforts.

    Can Canada still compete?

    Given the U.S. President Donald Trump administration’s withdrawal from the Paris Accord, one might wonder whether Canada should continue pursuing the CCR program.

    Ideally, Canada would not have to choose between strong climate policy and economic competitiveness. However, without a co-ordinated global approach to carbon policy, Canada faces difficult trade-offs.

    International organizations like the World Trade Organization (WTO) could step up by actively promoting carbon tariffs similar to the EU’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM).

    At the heart of this debate is the “polluter-pays principle,” which holds that those who pollute must bear the costs of their actions. This principle is central to climate justice.



    Read more:
    Carbon pricing works: the largest-ever study puts it beyond doubt

    Carbon pricing is the only abatement instrument that can implement the polluter-pays principle, but additional policies — such as border charges on imports, border rebates for exports or domestic output-based subsidies — are required to make it more efficient and politically viable.

    Currently, 75 carbon taxes and emissions trading systems are in operation worldwide, covering approximately 24 per cent of global emissions.

    Canada is considering its own CBAM, but challenges remain. Implementing such a policy could lead to heightened trade tensions with the U.S. or even provoke retaliatory actions.

    Need for international co-operation

    To make carbon pricing and border adjustments work, international organizations must help close the knowledge and information gaps. One way to do this is by providing more accurate data on embedded carbon prices to improve the calculation of carbon prices down the road.

    Further research is also needed to understand how domestic climate policies impact other nations and how to ensure CBAM’s interoperability with other climate measures. Such work will contribute to the optimization of climate policies for the benefit of all.

    In the meantime, Canada’s climate policy must strive to integrate CBAM in a way that aligns with global trade systems like the WTO. Some trade law experts have expressed concerns that CBAM may not be compatible with the WTO General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, and this must be addressed.

    If Canada were to keep the CCR, this integration would be especially important as Canada navigates future trade relations with the U.S. under Trump’s unpredictable administration. Canada doesn’t want to fall behind in its climate action efforts.

    Canadians would like the country to lead on climate action while staying competitive. A public consultation on this matter would be a good move from any elected political leader.

    Ruolz Ariste is currently affiliated with Carleton University and Université du Québec en Outaouais.

    – ref. The Canada Carbon Rebate is still widely misunderstood — here’s why – https://theconversation.com/the-canada-carbon-rebate-is-still-widely-misunderstood-heres-why-249097

    MIL OSI – Global Reports –

  • MIL-OSI Global: The urgent mental health needs of young people: Lessons for Canada from a global commission

    Source: The Conversation – Canada – By Tovah Cowan, Postdoctoral Fellow in Psychiatry, McGill University

    Since 2015, youth mental health has noticeably declined. Currently, 1.25 million young people in Canada require mental health support. (Shutterstock)

    Canada urgently needs to take action to support the well-being of young people and secure a healthier and more prosperous future for generations to come.

    Since 2015, well before the COVID-19 pandemic began, self-reported mental health has notably declined among young people. Currently, 1.25 million young people require mental health support. According to Mental Health Research Canada, in 2024, 19 per cent of Canadians between 16 and 34 years old accessed mental health services in the previous year while another 12 per cent felt they needed services but did not receive them.

    Megatrends

    The recently published Lancet Psychiatry Commission on Youth Mental Health shows that this problem is global, and in part driven by megatrends — major and long-lasting societal changes such as climate change, insecure employment and growing intergenerational inequality. These issues are situated within decades of colonial and neoliberal political, social and economic policies.



    Read more:
    What exactly is neoliberalism?

    In Canada, the effects of historic and ongoing colonialism on First Nations, Métis and Inuit youth are heartbreakingly clear in rates of suicide, which are six times higher in First Nations youth than non-Indigenous youth, and 33 times higher in young Inuit women than non-Indigenous young women. Additionally, there are gaps in services and barriers to access for Indigenous, 2SLGBTQ+, newcomer, Black and racialized young people, leading to disparities in care and support.

    To support youth mental health, Canada must work towards reversing these megatrends while also investing in youth mental health services.

    The youth mental health problem is global, and in part driven by ‘megatrends’ — major and long-lasting societal changes such as climate change, insecure employment and growing intergenerational inequality.
    (Shutterstock)

    As a team of mental health researchers and professionals, we are deeply committed to improving youth mental health. Without timely support, mental health challenges can disrupt education, relationships and career development, creating long-term effects for young people, their families and their communities. Unaddressed mental health issues can persist into adulthood, becoming more difficult to treat, adding preventable strain to health-care systems and hindering economic growth due to lost productivity.

    We were inspired by The Lancet Psychiatry Commission on Youth Mental Health, which calls for global action to address this urgent mental health crisis affecting young people. This global initiative involved researchers from diverse fields, service providers and young people, and was co-led by Srividya Iyer (a co-author on this piece and Canada Research Chair in Youth, Mental Health, and Learning Health Systems). It advances a framework for improving youth mental health care, integrating all sectors providing services relevant to mental health (for example, community centres, stand-alone clinics, hospitals) and all types of interventions, ranging from prevention to specialized services for youth with long-term mental health problems.

    The situation in Canada

    Canada is a global leader in creating new mental health services for youth, which began with the creation of a network of programs for youth with psychosis. Lessons learned have inspired transformation in broader youth mental health services, called “Integrated Youth Services” (IYS).

    Designed with input from youth and their families, IYS do not require transition from pediatric to adult care at age 18, which prevents youth from slipping through the cracks between the two systems. IYS integrate mental health, medical health and other social services; and create primary mental health care services.

    Today, there are almost 80 IYS hubs in most jurisdictions across Canada, with approximately 50 more in development. In the 2024 federal budget, a $500 million investment in community-based youth mental health services was the most positively received item by the public.

    These services and investments represent Canada’s critical commitment to youth mental health. However, there have been relatively fewer efforts to address other elements responding to factors contributing to worse youth mental health, such as the ongoing harms of colonization and the climate crisis.

    To truly address the youth mental health crisis, we must move beyond just creating services and into creating a world that supports young people to thrive. In these areas, young people themselves have shown us the way through initiatives like the Indigenous Climate Action Youth Leadership, the Anti-Racist Youth Lab and EveryChildNow, which takes action on youth poverty.

    What can we do

    Society must embrace a strong cultural shift that prioritizes a duty to young people.
    (Shutterstock)

    To support young people, the Lancet report highlights that society must embrace a strong cultural shift that prioritizes a duty to young people, future generations and intergenerational equity, ensuring that present-day policies consider their long-term impacts. The influence of megatrends suggests that activism on any of these societal issues can benefit youth mental health.

    For those who want to take action directly, advocating for increasing mental health and social service funding, supporting local organizations dedicated to young people, involving youth in decision-making processes, and fostering nurturing social communities are all important steps.

    In light of the upcoming federal election, Canadians should demand that all political parties have a clear plan for youth mental health. Policymaking should prioritize youth, family and community needs. Policies should be evidence-based, especially since intuitively helpful but untested ideas may have unintended consequences (for example, negative effects of universal prevention efforts) or can be complicated (such as the relationship between social media use and youth mental health).

    Continuous funding for mental health research can generate knowledge that can inform practice and policy, anticipate and respond to future priorities, test innovative interventions (like nature-based, social prescribing and intergenerational connection) and improve existing systems and interventions.

    Young people are tomorrow’s leaders, innovators and contributors. Ignoring their mental health problems undermines their potential and jeopardizes Canada’s ability to build a prosperous, inclusive society. Prioritizing youth mental health is not just a strategic investment for the country’s resilience — it is an ethical imperative.

    Tovah Cowan receives funding from CIHR for a Planning and Dissemination grant supporting a project related to improving learning health systems for youth mental health services. Her current salary is paid through a CIHR grant previously awarded to Dr. Iyer.

    Camila Velez receives funding from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) through a Doctoral Scholarship and a Planning and Dissemination grant for an International Symposium on arts-based research in youth mental health. Her current research assistant salary is paid through a CIHR grant previously awarded to Dr. Iyer.

    Nora Morrison’s current salary is paid through a CIHR grant previously awarded to Dr. Srividya Iyer.

    Rubén Valle receives his salary from a CIHR grant previously awarded to Dr. Iyer.

    Srividya N. Iyer is supported by the Canada Research Chairs Program (Tier 1) and has received peer-reviewed grants from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Fonds de Recherche du Québec – Santé and the International Development Research Centre.

    – ref. The urgent mental health needs of young people: Lessons for Canada from a global commission – https://theconversation.com/the-urgent-mental-health-needs-of-young-people-lessons-for-canada-from-a-global-commission-245039

    MIL OSI – Global Reports –

  • MIL-OSI Global: Why bike lanes should remain on Ontario’s roads

    Source: The Conversation – Canada – By Mahtot Gebresselassie, Assistant Professor, Environmental and Urban Change, York University, Canada

    In late 2024, the Ontario legislature passed Bill 212 giving the provincial government significant control over municipal bike lanes. The law requires municipalities to ask the province for its approval to install bike lanes if they would remove a lane for other vehicular traffic. The legislation also allows for the removal of three major bike lanes in Toronto.

    Supporters of such moves argue that bike lanes worsen traffic congestion, negatively impact local businesses and delay emergency vehicles from getting where they need to go. However, research shows that bike lanes improve transportation infrastructure, including preventing injuries.

    One of the main values of bike lanes is that they promote safety for all road users. Many cities around the world install bike lanes to wholly or partially separate cyclists from larger vehicles. This separation limits the interaction with cars and makes cycling safer.

    Bike lanes can also be more efficient at moving more people per unit width of the road compared to car lanes. They are also much more inexpensive to build than roads for cars. Protected bike lanes cost an average of a few hundred thousand per mile compared to vehicular roads in millions of dollars per lane mile.

    Reduced injuries

    Bicycles are classified as vehicles under Ontario’s Highway Traffic Act, and cyclists are rightful users of all roads except controlled access highways.

    When people cycle on infrastructure that supports biking (bike lanes, cycle tracks, low-speed zones, etc.), the risk of injury is reduced significantly. Bike lanes increase the visibility of cyclists to motorists and reduce interaction between cars and bikes.

    A 2016 paper that looked at data on bike networks and injuries in 10 Canadian and U.S. cities between 2000 and 2015 showed that an increase in bike networks led to a decrease in fatal and serious injuries.

    The safety associated with bike lanes can also encourage more people to take up cycling. A 2020 poll from the Canadian Automobile Association indicates that 40 per cent of Canadians reported they would feel encouraged to cycle on bike lanes physically separated from other vehicles.

    More inclusive roads

    Bike lanes can make cycling more inclusive for women, children, older adults, people with disabilities and those with limited transportation options.

    For them, bike lanes can bridge the equity gap and affirm cycling as something “inherently democratic, inclusive, and affordable.”

    Fewer women bike compared to men. A 2014 study that surveyed cyclists in five U.S. cities found that more women than men strongly agreed that protected bike lanes made them feel safe and new ones increased how often they cycled.

    Child cyclists benefit a great deal from bike lanes. They are often smaller and less visible to people driving cars. They are also less able to assess risk and navigate shared roads, so a separate lane can reduce those risks.

    Older adults and people with disabilities also benefit from bike lanes, as they provide a more suitable cycling environment for riding with limited physical acuity and slower speeds.

    Low-income and racialized people are significant bike users and are more likely to rely on biking to get around due to their limited access to transportation options. Yet, without bike lanes, they may have no choice but to risk cycling in a dangerous environment. For them, bike lanes are crucial infrastructure.

    Cycling is also much cheaper than having a car. Cycling costs about $0.06/km and driving a car $0.58/km, and switching from driving to cycling can reduce transportation spending from 30 per cent to 10 per cent of household income.

    Consumer spending and congestion

    Some argue that bike lanes reduce street parking, which can lead to lower economic activity. However, a 2012 study showed that people who cycle, walk and use transit frequent local businesses more and spend the same or more than those who use private cars.

    In Toronto, when bike lanes were installed on Bloor Street West, there was an average increase in monthly consumer spending from $186 to $245. A similar trend was observed in New York City, San Francisco, Los Angeles, Bern, Dublin and Copenhagen.

    When it comes to congestion, a 2018 study on the impact of installing bike lanes on arterial roads in Toronto found that the most affected street segments would only result in an estimated one-minute delay.

    A 2022 study from Melbourne showed a minor effect on traffic when bike lanes were added to residential streets with low speed limits. It also found the “selective inclusion” of safe cycling lanes, in the worst cases, leads to a delay of less than 10 seconds per kilometre for drivers.

    In New York, a 2016 study found that adding bike lanes reduced the average time for car travel on major thoroughfares from an average of 4.5 minutes to 3 minutes.

    Examples from elsewhere indicate that removing bike lanes would not bode well for Toronto. A well-used bike lane in London, England was removed in December 2020 following residents’ complaints that they caused traffic congestion. A study found that the removal resulted in longer travel time on the street compounded by cars illegally parking in the space previously reserved for the bike lane.

    Emergency response

    Immediately after the bike lanes were installed on Toronto’s Bloor Street West, paramedics response time within 500 metres of the bike lane corridor rose by 42 seconds compared to 45 seconds city-wide.

    Toronto Fire Services (TFS) response time increased by 30 seconds within the same corridor compared to a two-second increase for the entire city. However, these evaluations were for two months in 2023. In October 2024, TFS Chief Jim Jessop said the Bloor Street West bike lanes did not lead to an increase in response time.

    If these bike lanes are removed and replaced with others elsewhere, it could create a poorly connected bike network. The safety and convenience associated with connected bike networks will be lost as a result.

    Based on what research tells us, Toronto’s bike lanes should stay. Bike lanes provide various benefits, including making our streets more inclusive of more people.

    Bike lanes offer safety on the roads by reducing the risk of fatal or non-life-threatening injuries on roads, and are a tremendous gain for transportation infrastructure.

    Even in cases where a bike lane causes a few seconds of delay, politicians and city planners must consider the trade-off — especially if it means saving a person’s life.

    The authors do not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and have disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    – ref. Why bike lanes should remain on Ontario’s roads – https://theconversation.com/why-bike-lanes-should-remain-on-ontarios-roads-249150

    MIL OSI – Global Reports –

  • MIL-Evening Report: Hamas accuses Israel of ‘blackmail’ over aid, demands end of US support for Netanyahu

    Asia Pacific Report

    The Palestinian resistance group Hamas has accused Israel of “blackmail” over aid and urged the US government to act more like a neutral mediator in the ceasefire process.

    “We call on the US administration to stop its bias and alignment with the fascist plans of the war criminal Netanyahu, which target our people and their existence on their land,” Hamas said in a statement.

    “We affirm that all projects and plans that bypass our people and their established rights on their land, self-determination, and liberation from occupation are destined for failure and defeat.

    “We reaffirm our commitment to implementing the signed agreement in its three stages, and we have repeatedly announced our readiness to start negotiations on the second stage of the agreement,” it said.

    Al Jazeera Arabic reports that Israel sought a dramatic change to the terms of the ceasefire agreement with a demand that Hamas release five living captives and 10 bodies of dead captives in exchange for Palestinian prisoners and increased aid to the Gaza Strip.

    It also sought to extend the first phase of the ceasefire by a week.

    Hamas informed the mediators that it rejected the Israeli proposal and considered it a violation of what was agreed upon in the ceasefire.

    Israel suspends humanitarian aid
    In response, Israel suspended the entry of humanitarian aid until further notice and Hamas claimed Tel Aviv “bears responsibility” for the fate of the 59 Israelis still held in the Gaza Strip.

    Reports said Israeli attacks in Gaza on Sunday have killed at least four people and injured five people, according to medical sources.

    “The occupation [Israel] bears responsibility for the consequences of its decision on the population of the Strip and for the fate of its prisoners,” Hamas spokesman Hazem Qassem said in a statement.

    Hamas denounces blackmail headline on Al Jazeera news. Image: AJ screenshot APR

    Under the agreed ceasefire, the second phase of the truce was intended to see the release of the remaining captives, the full withdrawal of Israeli troops from Gaza and a final end to the war.

    However, the talks on how to carry out the second phase never began, and Israel said all its captives must be returned for fighting to stop.

    In an interview with Al Jazeera, an analyst said that although the fragile ceasefire seemed on the brink of collapse, it was unlikely that US President Donald Trump would allow it to fail.

    “I think the larger picture here is Trump is not interested in the resumption of war,” said Sami al-Arian, professor of public affairs at Istanbul Zaim University.

    “He has a very long agenda domestically and internationally and if it is going to be dragged by Netanyahu and his fascist partners into another war of genocide with no strategic end, he knows this is going to be a no-win for him.

    “And for one thing, Trump hates to lose.”

    No game plan
    In another interview, Israeli political commentator Ori Goldberg told Al Jazeera that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was caught between seeing the Gaza ceasefire through and resorting to a costly all-out war that may prove unpopular at home.

    “I’m not sure Netanyahu has a game plan,” Goldberg said.

    “The reason he hasn’t made a decision is because . . . Israel is not equipped to go to war right now. Resilience is at an all-time low. Resources are at an all-time low.”

    War crimes . . . a poster at a New Zealand pro-Palestinian rally in Auckland on Saturday. Image: Asia Pacific Report

    In December, the UN agency for Palestinian refugees reported that more than 19,000 children had been hospitalised for acute malnutrition in four months.

    In the first full year of the war — ending in October 2024 — 37 children died from malnutrition or dehydration.

    Last September 21, The International Criminal Court (ICC) said there was reason to believe Israel was using “starvation as a method of warfare” when it issued arrest warrants for Netanyahu and former Defence Minister Yoav Gallant.

    United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres said all efforts must be made to prevent a return to hostilities, which would be catastrophic.

    He urged all parties to exercise maximum restraint and find a way forward on the next phase.

    Guterres also called for an urgent de-escalation of the violence in the occupied West Bank.

    Almost 50,000 Palestinians have been killed in the Israeli war on Gaza since 7 October 2023.

    New Zealand protesters warn against a “nuclear winter” in a pro-Palestinian rally in Auckland on Saturday. Image: Asia Pacific Report

    MIL OSI Analysis – EveningReport.nz –

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: PM call with leaders of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania: 2 March 2025

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    News story

    PM call with leaders of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania: 2 March 2025

    The Prime Minister spoke to President Alar Karis of Estonia, Prime Minister Evika Siliņa of Latvia and President Gitanas Nausėda of Lithuania this morning.

    The Prime Minister spoke to President Alar Karis of Estonia, Prime Minister Evika Siliņa of Latvia and President Gitanas Nausėda of Lithuania this morning.

    The Prime Minister reiterated that Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania are key partners of the UK, including through the Joint Expeditionary Force, and welcomed their leading contributions in support of Ukraine since Russia’s illegal invasion began. 

    The Prime Minister updated them on his discussions with the leaders of Ukraine, France and the United States in recent days – and underlined his focus on securing a lasting peace in Ukraine that ensures their future sovereignty, backed up by strong security guarantees. 

    They all agreed that Europe must unite and drive forward urgent action that will secure the best outcome, which will be vital for Europe’s future security. 

    The Prime Minister updated on his plans to convene leaders in London later today for further discussions and they agreed to stay in close contact in the coming weeks.

    Updates to this page

    Published 2 March 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom –

  • MIL-OSI China: China’s Xinjiang moves to protect Gobi Desert with landmark regulation

    Source: China State Council Information Office 2

    Authorities in northwest China’s Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region have introduced a new legal framework to safeguard the Gobi, a vital part of the desert ecosystem.
    On Saturday, the city of Hami enacted Xinjiang’s first local regulation aimed at protecting the Gobi Desert, marking a major step in the region’s broader efforts to combat desertification through legal measures.
    The new regulation requires that city and county governments in Hami develop a comprehensive ecological protection plan with clear conservation and restoration targets. It also mandates that construction, tourism, and commercial activities within the Gobi align with these guidelines to prevent environmental degradation, said Li Qiang, deputy head of the standing committee of the Hami people’s congress.
    Experts noted that the Gobi’s gravel layer serves as a natural barrier against desertification. If disturbed, dormant dust sources could become active, intensifying sandstorms across the region.
    The Gobi Desert in Hami covers 94,600 square km, accounting for about 66 percent of the city’s total area, according to Hami’s bureau of ecology and environment.
    In August 2023, Hami launched an environmental project aimed at evaluating and restoring the Gobi Desert. Scientists from Nanjing City in east China collaborated on the initiative, which also helped advance the birth of the regulation.
    Xinjiang has long prioritized environmental conservation. In late November, the Taklimakan, China’s largest desert and the world’s second-largest drifting desert, was completely encircled with a sand-blocking green belt stretching 3,046 km.

    MIL OSI China News –

  • MIL-OSI Economics: Central Bank of Bahrain grants license to Mena Industrial Bank

    Source: Central Bank of Bahrain

    Published on 2 March 2025

    Manama, Kingdom of Bahrain – 2 March 2025 – The Central Bank of Bahrain (“CBB”) has granted “Mena Industrial Bank B.S.C. (c)” a Conventional Wholesale Bank license to operate in the Kingdom of Bahrain.

    Commenting on this announcement, Mr. Abdulla Haji, Director of Licensing Directorate at CBB, said “We are pleased to announce the issuance of a license to a new wholesale bank in Bahrain. This reflects the Kingdom’s continued appeal as a regional and international financial hub in attracting direct investments in the financial services sector. It also reflects CBB’s commitment to maintain a robust and progressive financial regulatory framework that supports economic growth, financial stability, and innovation”.

    The Bank will provide wholesale banking and trade finance solutions to corporations, government entities, and high-net-worth individuals, locally and regionally.

    Share this

    MIL OSI Economics –

  • MIL-OSI: Ellomay Capital Announces Execution of Project Finance Agreements for its 198 MW Solar Portfolio in Italy

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Tel-Aviv, Israel, March 02, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Ellomay Capital Ltd. (NYSE American; TASE: ELLO) (“Ellomay” or the “Company”), a renewable energy and power generator and developer of renewable energy and power projects in Europe, Israel and the USA, today reported that its wholly-owned subsidiary, Ellomay Holdings Luxembourg Sarl (“Ellomay Luxembourg”), which owns a portfolio of 198 MW solar facilities in Italy, among other assets, that includes operating and “ready to build” projects (the “Italian Solar Portfolio”), entered into a set of agreements governing the procurement of financing (the “Project Finance”) with a reputable European institutional investor (the “Lender”), intended to finance the construction and related expenses of the Italian Solar Portfolio. The Italian Solar Portfolio includes three solar facilities, in the aggregate capacity of approximately 38 MW, which are already constructed and connected to the grid, and additional projects with an aggregate capacity of approximately 160 MW that have reached ready-to-build status.

    The Project Finance in an amount of up to €110 million will be provided by way of senior secured notes to be issued in multiple tranches during the construction phase by a wholly-owned subsidiary of Ellomay Luxembourg. All notes are due on December 31, 2047 and to be repaid in semi-annual installments. The notes bear interest from and including the issue date to and excluding the maturity date at the rate of 4.50% per annum, to be paid semi-annually in arrears.

    The financial closing of the Project Finance is expected to occur in the coming weeks.

    About Ellomay Capital Ltd.

    Ellomay is an Israeli based company whose shares are registered with the NYSE American and with the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange under the trading symbol “ELLO”. Since 2009, Ellomay Capital focuses its business in the renewable energy and power sectors in Europe, USA and Israel.

    To date, Ellomay has evaluated numerous opportunities and invested significant funds in the renewable, clean energy and natural resources industries in Israel, Italy, Spain, the Netherlands and Texas, USA, including:

    • Approximately 335.9 MW of operating solar power plants in Spain (including a 300 MW solar plant in owned by Talasol, which is 51% owned by the Company) and approximately 38 MW of operating solar power plants in Italy;
    • 9.375% indirect interest in Dorad Energy Ltd., which owns and operates one of Israel’s largest private power plants with production capacity of approximately 850MW, representing about 6%-8% of Israel’s total current electricity consumption;
    • Groen Gas Goor B.V., Groen Gas Oude-Tonge B.V. and Groen Gas Gelderland B.V., project companies operating anaerobic digestion plants in the Netherlands, with a green gas production capacity of approximately 3 million, 3.8 million and 9.5 million Nm3 per year, respectively;
    • 83.333% of Ellomay Pumped Storage (2014) Ltd., which is involved in a project to construct a 156 MW pumped storage hydro power plant in the Manara Cliff, Israel;
    • Solar projects in Italy with an aggregate capacity of 285 MW that have reached “ready to build” status; and
    • Solar projects in the Dallas Metropolitan area, Texas, USA with an aggregate capacity of 49 MW that are under construction.

    For more information about Ellomay, visit http://www.ellomay.com.

    Information Relating to Forward-Looking Statements

    This press release contains forward-looking statements that involve substantial risks and uncertainties, including statements that are based on the current expectations and assumptions of the Company’s management. All statements, other than statements of historical facts, included in this press release regarding the Company’s plans and objectives, expectations and assumptions of management are forward-looking statements. The use of certain words, including the words “estimate,” “project,” “intend,” “expect,” “believe” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The Company may not actually achieve the plans, intentions or expectations disclosed in the forward-looking statements and you should not place undue reliance on the Company’s forward-looking statements. Various important factors could cause actual results or events to differ materially from those that may be expressed or implied by the Company’s forward-looking statements, including the non-fulfillment of any of the conditions to closing set forth in the Project Finance documentation, changes in electricity prices and demand, regulatory changes, increases in interest rates and inflation, changes in the supply and prices of resources required for the operation of the Company’s facilities (such as waste and natural gas) and in the price of oil, the impact of the war and hostilities in Israel and Gaza, the impact of continued military conflict between Russia and Ukraine, technical and other disruptions in the operations or construction of the power plants owned by the Company and general market, political and economic conditions in the countries in which the Company operates, including Israel, Spain, Italy and the United States. These and other risks and uncertainties associated with the Company’s business are described in greater detail in the filings the Company makes from time to time with Securities and Exchange Commission, including its Annual Report on Form 20-F. The forward-looking statements are made as of this date and the Company does not undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

    Contact:
    Kalia Rubenbach (Weintraub)
    CFO
    Tel: +972 (3) 797-1111
    Email: hilai@ellomay.com

    The MIL Network –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Flags Lowered to Honor Dr. Hazel N. Dukes

    Source: US State of New York

    Official websites use ny.gov

    A ny.gov website belongs to an official New York State government organization.

    Secure ny.gov websites use HTTPS

    A lock icon or https:// means you’ve safely connected to a ny.gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

    You are leaving the official State of New York website.

    The State of New York does not imply approval of the listed destinations, warrant the accuracy of any information set out in those destinations, or endorse any opinions expressed therein. External web sites operate at the direction of their respective owners who should be contacted directly with questions regarding the content of these sites.

    Visit Site

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Transcript: Disincentivizing Private Equity Housing Investors

    Source: US State of New York

    arlier today, Governor Kathy Hochul made a stop in Rochester to highlight her 2025 State of the State proposal to give more families an opportunity to become homeowners by disincentivizing institutional investors from buying up one- and two-family homes across New York State. The Governor’s proposed legislation will require a 75-day waiting period before institutional investors that own 10 or more single- and two-family properties and have $50 million in assets can make an offer on or buy one- or two-family homes. Additionally, Governor Hochul proposed reducing the opportunity for these institutional investors to take advantage of tax code provisions that make these investments in single- and two-family homes more lucrative by generally denying these entities the ability to utilize depreciation tax or most interest deductions on these properties.

    VIDEO: The event is available to stream on YouTube here and TV quality video is available here (h.264, mp4).

    AUDIO: The Governor’s remarks are available in audio form here.

    PHOTOS: The Governor’s Flickr page will post photos of the event here.

    A rush transcript of the Governor’s remarks is available below:

    I always feel so welcome in the Rochester area – the Finger Lakes region – it’s a spectacular area and it’s a place where you understand if you say, “Go Bills,” you’ll get an answer back, right? Go Bills! I’m right at home, and so, there’s always next year. It’s kind of our slogan for 31 years, but we’re going to say it again.

    And also, New Yorkers don’t agree on everything, and they don’t all agree on our sports teams in other parts of the state, although I’m converting everybody – but it’s a very, fabulously diverse place. And I’ve been so blessed to be someone who came from Western New York who was proud to represent this area in Congress, but also now to be able to represent the entire state.

    And I’m so acutely aware of the diversity and the different places that people live and the different options they have. Some are tiny, little hamlets with one stop sign and some are just enormous metropolitan areas like New York City.

    But one thing we have in common is that everybody has a dream. Everybody thinks that someday they’re going to have a home. And it’s something that particularly here Upstate, it never was that far out of reach. Maybe your grandparents had a home and your parents had a home. And the expectation was that every generation would be able to have the power, the ability to buy their own home.

    Yes, it’s going to be a struggle. I remember scraping nickels together for my husband and I to get our first home. It was 1,300 square feet, and we raised two kids in it. They were in one bedroom, we were in the other, one bathroom. But you know what – it was ours. It’s ours, it meant so much to us.

    That townie house now is over $1 million. I paid almost nothing for it. So, it’s so hard for young people today, but everybody just wants to have a stable place. And we talk about a place like Rochester, and a place like Buffalo, Rochester, Upstate, had always been known for their affordability. That was good. That meant you had the options available to you.

    But now we have what is called a “Hot Market.” Sounds good. Sounds really – hey, who doesn’t want to be hot, right? It sounds great. I shouldn’t have said that.

    But that’s what they describe Upstate New York, right? Buffalo, I think they said Buffalo is the hottest housing market in America. And we’re right up here second or third in this area. It’s really something that I know the people in this room – and I want to just take a moment to acknowledge the extraordinary partners that I have in government here because they’re on this quest with me to ensure that that dream becomes a reality for all New Yorkers.

    And I want to start with our Mayor Malik Evans. He has been such a champion for the people of this region. I honor your public service. It is hard. We’ve been fighting crime together and stabilizing our communities. Amazing partner of mine. I want to give a special round of applause to our Mayor, Malik Evans.

    Your Senator, Samra Brouk. I want to thank her for all she does and a great champion for this area. A real fighter. Assemblymember Sarah Clark. We’ve worked together for many years since your first run. We’ve been together and I appreciate you stepping up and running. And of course, Jen Lunsford, who’s doing such an incredible job as well.

    These are your champions in Albany. These are your champions. And also, you’ll be hearing from Theo Finn. Theo’s a rock star in her own right and the Greater Rochester Housing Project, because all she wakes up thinking about is, “How I’m going to build more housing.” And I just love that spirit of public service, let’s give her a round of applause, Theo Finn.

    And Luis Alvarez, our regular person who’s going to talk to you about what regular people are going through. And I thank him for being here. And is Bill Moehle here too? I just saw you over there. Bill, stand up. Our Supervisor. Thank you. Bill’s been — we’ve been working together a long, long time together.

    But, not finding a home is a huge source of stress. Sometimes you have a lot of pressure. You might be about to change jobs — and this is what my son and daughter in law just went through — about to change jobs, but you knew if you did that and then try to apply for financing they’d say, “Oh, you’ve only been at this job a few months.” So, it’s going to be a strike against you. So there’s a lot of pressure on everybody.

    And what I want to be able to do is — also for our businesses that we’re attracting here — we’re doing really well attracting businesses to the Rochester region. It’s a hot place to be. But if the businesses come and they say, “Well, where are people supposed to live?” And if you can’t offer the housing stock to their workers, they might have to find someplace else.

    So, we think about the people who are already here who raised their children, and those children want to live in the same neighborhood. They’ve got great schools, great opportunities, great quality of life, but too many times the families have had to move away when it’s time for them to have a family because they don’t have a home to live in.

    Also, it’s an economic issue. We have to be able to tell businesses who are here, and those who are recruiting, that there is plentiful, affordable housing stock. But think also about the senior citizens. And maybe they’ve been blessed with the home, but they want to downsize. If there’s not a condo or an apartment or a townhouse to move to, then their options are limited.

    So, that’s what we’ve been tackling head on. As Governor, I took on the housing crisis, and many people said, “Don’t go there. It’s complicated. There’s a reason no other Governor talks about housing,” but we are successful in working with our partners in the Legislature over the last couple of years, really achieving something that we should be proud of.

    The New York Times said it’s the most far-reaching, ambitious housing package in 70 years, 60 years — I don’t want to exaggerate, 60 years. That’s pretty impressive. That’s older than most of you in this room. It’s a long time. But, I also unveiled the plan to have over 100,000 new units built in 5 years, and we’re getting there ahead of schedule.

    And people said, “That’s too ambitious; it’s too big,” but we’re really, really ahead of schedule on that as well. So, we’re really excited about this. But, also, one other thing I add to the table — a lot of communities have said, “Don’t tell us we have to grow.” Okay, you should grow on your own, but if you don’t know to do this, then I’ll put incentives out there. I will make it easier for you to be able to grow and help with programs and projects that can help your community like the pro-housing agenda.

    If you’ve not heard of this, the communities that say, “We are pro-housing. We will step up and pass a resolution.” I was on a town board for 14 years. We did resolutions all the time. You write the resolution, you get it passed and what that says is that we have the ambition to build more housing. This is really important.

    And, so, the communities that are doing it are eligible for $650 million of everything from downtown revitalization, to special grants for water and sewer, to Main Street programs — Main Street grant — all that’s available for the communities that say, “We’re going to build more housing,” and we’ve added another $100 million to that.

    We’re also adding money for people to be able to afford that first home. We’re going to have $100 million for new starter homes for purchasing and that provide that down payment for first time home buyers — that could really make a difference for someone. And I’m going to have a new housing ombudsman because a lot of developers say it just takes too long. It’s too frustrating. And I’m going to have a person dedicated to making that a lot easier.

    But here’s the truth, no matter what we’re doing, we’re in competition with a powerful, powerful force. Our parents and grandparents didn’t have to bid against private equity firms when they’re buying their first home. That wasn’t happening. And these huge, greedy conglomerates are gobbling up the housing stock and they’re trying to increase their portfolios and bring in more money and they’re building up a lot more vacation homes and rentals.

    And think about a young family that’s scraping together everything they’ve got, and you’ll hear about this from Luis, every dime you have and everything you’re dedicated to, and you’re trying to get out there and you’re going and making offer after offer after offer, and you keep losing because there’s somebody else who’s not from your community, who doesn’t understand our values, our way of life, who comes in to make a buck and they pluck down a cash offer.You can’t compete with that. And it’s so sad. It’s tragic when you think about it. And they’re milking it.

    And this is a real threat that they’re saying that by 2030, 40 percent of the homes will be owned by private equity firms. That’s shocking. And they’re not always investing in them either. They’re getting run down. So we have to fight this. And they’re also engaging sometimes in illegal income discrimination practices, and the local news is talking about it and they’re violating codes — they’re wreaking havoc. But I want to do something about it. We can complain all we want, but when I hear there’s a problem, I want a solution.

    So I worked with my team, and in this year’s Budget I announced this – I said, “What we’re going to do is say, private equity companies – you can have your chance, but you’re going to wait 75 days. You’re going to give the rest of the people, the real people, not the corporations, a chance to bid over 75 days, make their offers first. So you can get in line. You may end up getting a home, buying it, but I don’t want any more hard working individuals or moms or dads or anybody who wants this dream to become reality to have to lose out to you.” And that’s how we’re going to stop it.

    So, these homes we built, these homes are being built, we’re going to build more housing, that’s great. But I want to make sure that people have a chance to get in that market and be able to bid on it. So, I’m grateful to, again, our elected officials who will support this. You’re with me, right? Okay, good, I got the – you heard it there, my entire Budget’s been supported by the front row. Grateful for that.

    But also this is a fight. They’re not going to like this. They have a lot of money to fight this, fight us back. But I’m not afraid of this. You’re not afraid of this either, are you? We’re going to stand up and fight for our families, our individuals, and our seniors, because this is a fight worth taking on.

    So I thank all of you for being part of this. We’re ready for it, and let’s make sure that this policy gets over the finish line. So thank you everyone. I appreciate your support for this. And also let me bring up our Mayor, Malik Evans.

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI USA News: Designating English as the Official Language of The United States

    Source: The White House

    class=”has-text-align-left”>By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered:

    Section 1.  Purpose and Policy.  From the founding of our Republic, English has been used as our national language.  Our Nation’s historic governing documents, including the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution, have all been written in English.  It is therefore long past time that English is declared as the official language of the United States.  A nationally designated language is at the core of a unified and cohesive society, and the United States is strengthened by a citizenry that can freely exchange ideas in one shared language.

    In welcoming new Americans, a policy of encouraging the learning and adoption of our national language will make the United States a shared home and empower new citizens to achieve the American dream.  Speaking English not only opens doors economically, but it helps newcomers engage in their communities, participate in national traditions, and give back to our society.  This order recognizes and celebrates the long tradition of multilingual American citizens who have learned English and passed it to their children for generations to come.

    To promote unity, cultivate a shared American culture for all citizens, ensure consistency in government operations, and create a pathway to civic engagement, it is in America’s best interest for the Federal Government to designate one — and only one — official language.  Establishing English as the official language will not only streamline communication but also reinforce shared national values, and create a more cohesive and efficient society.

    Accordingly, this order designates English as the official language of the United States.

    Sec. 2.  Definitions.  For purposes of this order:
    (a)  “Agency” has the meaning given to it in section 3502 of title 44, United States Code, except that such term does not include the Executive Office of the President or any components thereof.

    (b)  “Agency Head” means the highest-ranking official of an agency, such as the Secretary, Administrator, Chairman, or Director, unless otherwise specified in this order.

    Sec. 3.  Designating an Official Language for the United States.  (a)  English is the official language of the United States. 

    (b)  Executive Order 13166 of August 11, 2000 (Improving Access to Services for Persons with Limited English Proficiency), is hereby revoked; nothing in this order, however, requires or directs any change in the services provided by any agency.  Agency heads should make decisions as they deem necessary to fulfill their respective agencies’ mission and efficiently provide Government services to the American people.  Agency heads are not required to amend, remove, or otherwise stop production of documents, products, or other services prepared or offered in languages other than English.  

    (c)  The Attorney General shall rescind any policy guidance documents issued pursuant to Executive Order 13166 and provide updated guidance, consistent with applicable law.

    Sec. 4.  General Provisions.  (a)  Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:

    (i)   the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or the head thereof; or

    (ii)  the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.

    (b)  This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.

    (c)  This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

    THE WHITE HOUSE,
        March 1, 2025.

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI USA News: Addressing the Threat to National Security from Imports of Timber, Lumber

    Source: The White House

    class=”has-text-align-left”>By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1862) (Trade Expansion Act), it is hereby ordered:

    Section 1.  Policy.  The wood products industry, composed of timber, lumber, and their derivative products (such as paper products, furniture, and cabinetry) is a critical manufacturing industry essential to the national security, economic strength, and industrial resilience of the United States.  This industry plays a vital role in key downstream civilian industries, including construction.

    The United States faces significant vulnerabilities in the wood supply chain from imported timber, lumber, and their derivative products being dumped onto the United States market.

    The United States has ample timber resources.  The current United States softwood lumber industry has the practical production capacity to supply 95 percent of the United States’ 2024 softwood consumption.  Yet, since 2016 the United States has been a net importer of lumber.

    Wood products are a key input used by both the civilian construction industry and the military.  Each year, the United States military spends over 10 billion dollars on construction.  The military also invests in innovative building material technology, including processes to create innovative wood products such as cross-laminated timber.  The procurement of these building materials depends on a strong domestic lumber industry and a manufacturing base capable of meeting both military-specific and wider civilian needs.

    It is the policy of the United States to ensure reliable, secure, and resilient domestic supply chains of timber, lumber, and their derivative products.  Unfair subsidies and foreign government support for foreign timber, lumber, and their derivative products necessitate action under section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act to determine whether imports of these products threaten to impair national security.

    Sec. 2.  Investigation.  (a)  The Secretary of Commerce shall initiate an investigation under section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act to determine the effects on the national security of imports of timber, lumber, and their derivative products.

    (b)  In conducting the investigation described in subsection (a) of this section, the Secretary of Commerce shall assess the factors set forth in 19 U.S.C. 1862(d), labeled “Domestic production for national defense; impact of foreign competition on economic welfare of domestic industries,” as well as other relevant factors, including:

    (i)    the current and projected demand for timber and lumber in the United States;

    (ii)   the extent to which domestic production of timber and lumber can meet domestic demand;

    (iii)  the role of foreign supply chains, particularly of major exporters, in meeting United States timber and lumber demand;

    (iv)   the impact of foreign government subsidies and predatory trade practices on United States timber, lumber, and derivative product industry competitiveness;

    (v)    the feasibility of increasing domestic timber and lumber capacity to reduce imports; and

    (vi)   the impact of current trade policies on domestic timber, lumber, and derivative product production, and whether additional measures, including tariffs or quotas, are necessary to protect national security.

    Sec. 3.  Required Actions.  (a)  The Secretary of Commerce shall consult with the Secretary of Defense and the heads of other relevant executive departments and agencies as determined by the Secretary of Commerce to evaluate the national security risks associated with imports of timber, lumber, and their derivative products.

    (b)  No later than 270 days after the date of this order, the Secretary of Commerce shall submit a report to the President that includes:

    (i)    findings on whether imports of timber, lumber, and their derivative products threaten national security;

    (ii)   recommendations on actions to mitigate such threats, including potential tariffs, export controls, or incentives to increase domestic production; and

    (iii)  policy recommendations for strengthening the United States timber and lumber supply chain through strategic investments and permitting reforms.

    Sec. 4.  Definitions.  As used in this order:

    (a)  The term “timber” refers to wood that has not been processed.

    (b)  The term “lumber” refers to wood that has been processed, including wood that has been milled and cut into boards or planks.

    Sec. 5.  General Provisions.  (a)  Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:

    (i)   the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or the head thereof; or

    (ii)  the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.

    (b)  This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.

    (c)  This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

    THE WHITE HOUSE,
        March 1, 2025.

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Amendments to Approved Document B (fire safety): Circular 01/2025

    Source: United Kingdom – Government Statements

    Correspondence

    Amendments to Approved Document B (fire safety): Circular 01/2025

    Circular replacing Approved Document B vols.1 and 2 (2019 ed. incorporating 2020 and 2022 amendments with 2025, 2026 and 2029 amendments) to make corrections.

    Applies to England

    Documents

    Amendments to Approved Document B (fire safety): letter

    HTML

    Amendments to Approved Document B (fire safety): Circular 01/2025

    PDF, 184 KB, 4 pages

    Details

    The circular and circular letter record the withdrawal and replacement of Approved Document B (Fire Safety) Volumes 1 and 2: 2019 edition incorporating 2020 and 2022 amendments collated with 2025, 2026 and 2029 amendments. It details where changes have been made to correct typographical errors. The policy intent, implementation schedule and transitional provisions are unchanged.

    Updates to this page

    Published 2 March 2025

    Sign up for emails or print this page

    MIL OSI United Kingdom –

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Prime Minister Keir Starmer to host leaders summit on Ukraine

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    Press release

    Prime Minister Keir Starmer to host leaders summit on Ukraine

    The Prime Minister will intensify his efforts in pursuit of a just and lasting peace in Ukraine by convening international leaders at a summit in London today [2 March 2025].

    The Prime Minister will intensify his efforts in pursuit of a just and lasting peace in Ukraine by convening international leaders at a summit in London today. 

    The Prime Minister has this weekend reiterated his unwavering support for Ukraine and is determined to find a way forward that brings an end to Russia’s illegal war and guarantees Ukraine a lasting peace based on sovereignty and security. 

    The summit rounds off a week of intense diplomacy for the Prime Minister, which has seen him raise UK defence spending and travel to Washington D.C. for productive talks with President Trump in support of UK and European security. The Prime Minister spoke again with both President Trump and President Zelenskyy on Friday evening following the events of yesterday at the Presidents’ meeting in Washington D.C. 

    The Prime Minister will welcome Italy’s Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni to Downing Street this morning, before being joined at the summit in central London by the leaders of Ukraine, France, Germany, Denmark, Italy, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Spain, Canada, Finland, Sweden, Czechia and Romania. The Turkish Foreign Minister, NATO Secretary General and the Presidents of the European Commission and European Council will also attend. 

    The Prime Minister has been clear that there can be no negotiations about Ukraine without Ukraine, a determination he reiterated when he warmly welcomed President Zelenskyy to Downing Street on Saturday evening ahead of the summit. 

    Discussions at the summit will focus on: 

    • Strengthening Ukraine’s position now – including ongoing military support and increased economic pressure on Russia. 

    • The need for a strong lasting deal that delivers a permanent peace in Ukraine and ensures that Ukraine is able to deter and defend against future Russian attack. 

    • Next steps on planning for strong security guarantees. 

    Following the announcement earlier this week that the UK will spend 2.5% of its GDP on defence by 2027, the Prime Minister will be clear on the need for Europe to play its part on defence and step up for the good of collective security. 

    The UK has already been clear it is willing to support Ukraine’s future security with troops on the ground. 

    Prime Minister Keir Starmer said: 

    Three years on from Russia’s brutal invasion of Ukraine, we are at a turning point. Today I will reaffirm my unwavering support for Ukraine and double down on my commitment to provide capacity, training and aid to Ukraine, putting it in the strongest possible position. 

    In partnership with our allies, we must intensify our preparations for the European element of security guarantees, alongside continued discussions with the United States.   

    We have an opportunity to come together to ensure a just and lasting peace in Ukraine that secures their sovereignty and security.   

    Now is the time for us to unite in order to guarantee the best outcome for Ukraine, protect European security, and secure our collective future.

    Updates to this page

    Published 1 March 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom –

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: UK reinforces support for Ukraine with £2.26 billion loan to bolster Ukrainian defence capabilities

    Source: United Kingdom – Government Statements

    Press release

    UK reinforces support for Ukraine with £2.26 billion loan to bolster Ukrainian defence capabilities

    Chancellor Rachel Reeves and Ukraine’s Finance Minister Sergii Marchenko will today (Saturday 1 March) sign the UK-Ukraine Bilateral agreement.

    • The £2.26 billion loan will bolster Ukrainian military capability, and will be paid back using profits generated on sanctioned Russian sovereign assets.
    • Chancellor Rachel Reeves and Ukrainian Finance Minister Sergii Marchenko will sign the formal loan agreement today (Saturday 1 March), with the first tranche of funding expected to reach Ukraine later next week.
    • The loan demonstrates the UK’s commitment to Ukrainian defence. A strong Ukraine is vital to UK national security – the first duty of any government and central to the Plan for Change.

    Chancellor Rachel Reeves and Ukraine’s Finance Minister Sergii Marchenko will today (Saturday 1 March) sign the UK-Ukraine Bilateral agreement.

    This agreement will deliver £2.26 billion in funding to Ukraine, which will be paid back using the extraordinary profits generated on sanctioned Russian sovereign assets held in the EU.

    This is the UK’s contribution to the G7 Extraordinary Revenue Acceleration (ERA) Loans to Ukraine scheme, through which G7 countries will collectively provide $50 billion to support Ukraine.

    Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves said:

    A safe and secure Ukraine is a safe and secure United Kingdom. This funding will bolster Ukraine’s armed forces and will put Ukraine in the strongest possible position at a critical juncture in the war.

    It comes as we have increased our defence spending to 2.5% of GDP, which will deliver the stability required to keep us safe and underpin economic growth.

    The loan will be fully earmarked for military procurement to bolster Ukraine’s defences, with the first tranche of funding expected to be disbursed to Ukraine next week.

    Russia’s obligation under international law to pay for the damage it has caused to Ukraine is clear and this G7 agreement, backed by the profits generated on sanctioned Russian sovereign assets, is an important step to ensuring this happens.

    The funding will be delivered in three equal annual payments of £752m.

    The announcement of the loan agreement is on top of the £3 billion a year commitment by the UK to provide military aid for Ukraine. The Prime Minister has been clear that a strong Ukraine is vital to UK national security.

    This loan follows the announcement by the Prime Minister committing the Government to increase UK defence spending to 2.5% of GDP by 2027, with an ambition to spend 3% of GDP on defence in the next parliament as economic and fiscal conditions allow.

    This represents the biggest sustained increase in defence spending since the Cold War, safeguarding our collective security and funding the capabilities, technology and industrial capacity needed to keep the UK and our allies safe for generations to come.

    As set out in the Plan for Change, national security is the first duty of the government, and investment in defence will protect UK citizens from threats at home while also creating a secure and stable environment for economic growth.

    Updates to this page

    Published 1 March 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom –

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: PM meeting with President Zelenskyy of Ukraine: 1 March 2025

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    Press release

    PM meeting with President Zelenskyy of Ukraine: 1 March 2025

    Prime Minister Keir Starmer welcomed President Zelenskyy to Downing Street this afternoon.

    The Prime Minister welcomed President Zelenskyy to Downing Street this afternoon. 

    The Prime Minister reiterated his unwavering support for Ukraine, adding that the UK will always stand with them, for as long as it takes.

    The Prime Minister re-stated his determination to finding a path that ends Russia’s illegal war and ensures a just and lasting peace that secures Ukraine’s future sovereignty and security. 

    The leaders looked forward to continuing these discussions at tomorrow’s leaders’ summit in London.

    Updates to this page

    Published 1 March 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom –

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: PM meeting President Zelenskyy of Ukraine: 1 March 2025

    Source: United Kingdom – Government Statements

    Press release

    PM meeting President Zelenskyy of Ukraine: 1 March 2025

    Prime Minister Keir Starmer welcomed President Zelenskyy to Downing Street this afternoon.

    The Prime Minister welcomed President Zelenskyy to Downing Street this afternoon. 

    The Prime Minister reiterated his unwavering support for Ukraine, adding that the UK will always stand with them, for as long as it takes.

    The Prime Minister re-stated his determination to finding a path that ends Russia’s illegal war and ensures a just and lasting peace that secures Ukraine’s future sovereignty and security. 

    The leaders looked forward to continuing these discussions at tomorrow’s leaders’ summit in London.

    Updates to this page

    Published 1 March 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom –

  • MIL-OSI USA: More Support for Trump Administration’s Pursuit of Peace in Ukraine

    US Senate News:

    Source: The White House
    Support continues to roll in for the unwavering commitment of President Donald J. Trump and Vice President Vance to the American people and the Trump Administration’s relentless pursuit of peace. Speaker Mike Johnson: “Thanks to President Trump – the days of America being taken advantage of and disrespected are OVER. The death and destruction of the Russian-provoked war needs to stop immediately, and only our American President can put these two countries on a path to lasting peace. President Zelenskyy needed to acknowledge that, and accept the extraordinary mineral rights partnership proposal that President Trump put on the table. What we witnessed in the Oval Office today was an American President putting America first.” Secretary of State Marco Rubio: “The only person on the planet who is actively trying to bring an end to this conflict is named Donald Trump, the President of the United States.” National Security Advisor Mike Waltz: “It’s not clear that Zelenskyy truly wants to stop the fighting. He came in, even though he was warned not to, determined to litigate all of that … This was the wrong approach, wrong time in history, and definitely the wrong president to try to do this.” Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard: “Thank you @realDonaldTrump for your unwavering leadership in standing up for the interests of the American people, and peace. What you said is absolutely true: Zelensky has been trying to drag the United States into a nuclear war with Russia/WW3 for years now, and no one has called him on it. Thank you, Vice President @JDVance for speaking out so forcefully and clearly, about the necessity of diplomacy.” UN Ambassador-designate Elise Stefanik: “President Trump will ALWAYS stand up for the American people – especially in the Oval Office. Peace through strength is back on the world stage because of President Trump’s bold and strong leadership.” Sen. Eric Schmitt: “Zelensky was probably used to talking this way to American leaders. Apparently, no one told him that things have changed. The age of America Last foreign policy is over. From this day forward, it’s going to be only America First.” Sen. Lindsey Graham: “I have never been more proud of the president. I was very proud of JD Vance, standing up for our country.” CNN’s Scott Jennings: “All Zelenskyy had to do today was put on a tie, show up, smile, say thank you, sign the papers, and have lunch. That’s it — and he couldn’t do that.” Marc Thiessen: “There was no ambush. Z was set up for success. All he had to do was not get into a public fight and sign the minerals deal.  Not hard. A lot of work went into making a successful moment possible and he blew it and then refused to apologize.” Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller: “The way that President Trump defended Americans after YEARS of being fleeced and abused and taken advantage of and taken for granted — millions of American hearts swelled with overflowing pride today to watch President Trump put Zelenskyy in his place.” Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt: “[Zelenskyy] refuses to recognize the practical reality of this war. It has been going on for years, his countrymen are dying, and the people who have been funding this effort — the American people — are sick and tired of footing this bill.” Rep. Victoria Spartz: “It’s such a disservice to the Ukrainian people to play hero and politics and trying to increase his rating … Being so insulting to the American people after how much was done by us for Ukraine and for Europe, I can’t believe it.” Rep. Kevin Hern: “President Trump is determined to end the war in Ukraine. He is determined for the world to get back at peace, as it was when he was in office before.”

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: AFSCME’s Saunders: ‘The biggest scheme of all time is Elon Musk’s takeover of the federal government’

    Source: American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees Union

    WASHINGTON – AFSCME President Lee Saunders released the following statement after Elon Musk called Social Security ‘the biggest Ponzi scheme of all time’:

    “The biggest scheme of all time is Elon Musk’s hostile takeover of the American government, a takeover in which the richest man in the world is somehow allowed to make decisions on a whim that hurt working people and seniors all to fund tax breaks for himself and his fellow billionaires. Their only goal is to rob working people of the Social Security benefits we have earned, so they can make themselves even richer. This administration is only making fraud and waste easier to accomplish by firing the inspectors general whose job it is to audit the government and firing the qualified professionals who actually know how government works. It’s all part of their scheme to continue to steal power and wealth from working people and seniors. But we know Social Security is a trust that we’ve paid into, and we’re not going to let Elon Musk or any unelected billionaire take it away from us.”

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI Global: It was risky for Ontario Premier Doug Ford to call an early election — but it paid off

    Source: The Conversation – Canada – By Sam Routley, PhD Candidate, Political Science, Western University

    Ontario Premier Doug Ford’s election gamble has paid off. As a consequence of last night’s election results, the Progressive Conservatives are now set to form their third consecutive majority government.

    By and large, last night’s election results were dull and uninspiring, looking very similar to the outcome of the province’s election in 2022. The Progressive Conservatives return (going from 79 to 80) with only one additional member of caucus, receiving a noticeable but modest two per cent bump in support.

    And, while the Liberals saw even more of a recovery from 2018, the generally widespread distribution of that vote means that they were only able to gain five seats. Although tarnished, the New Democrats return as the official opposition party.

    Unprepared rivals

    These lacklustre results flow directly from lacklustre campaigns. The fact is that, regardless of Premier Ford’s legitimate calls for a renewed mandate amidst an aggressive American administration, the party had been looking for an excuse to call a premature election for quite some time. In doing so, they were able to — quite intentionally — catch their rivals unprepared, complete with incomplete candidate slates, unknown leaders and undercooked policy platforms.

    It meant that, while Ford was able to run a safe and constrained front-runner’s campaign, his main opponents struggled to find the momentum necessary to move the dial and exploit enough backlash. This is alongside real policy vulnerabilities in health care and education, with enough voters expressing discontent with what they felt to be an unnecessary and self-serving election call.

    Chaotic news cycle

    There are good reasons to believe that voters were mostly apathetic towards the parties and their candidates. Alongside the reasons already stated, the dense, chaotic and ever-shifting news cycle of the last few months may have entailed that this election was able to slip by quietly.

    But this does not seem to be the full story, as this year’s turnout — while still low — is slightly higher than that of 2022. Instead, voters also seemed to have wanted to maintain the status quo.

    On the local level, siting members of the provincial legislature from all three parties generally performed quite well. Of the 111 ridings with party-nominated incumbents, for example, only four lost. So while many voters may have been unhappy with the election call, the unpredictable environment may have also had the reverse effect of leading them to support, if not fully endorse, the leaders they already have.

    Regardless of the more limited dynamics of this election, however, we cannot overlook the fact that this has been a very real accomplishment for Doug Ford and the Progressive Conservatives. In a period of high executive turnover and anti-incumbent backlash, Doug Ford has, as the leader of the Progressive Conservative Party of Ontario, brought about a track record of secure, consecutive majorities — a feat that was last attained by Leslie Frost and John Robarts.

    In many ways, it brings to mind the years of the traditional “big blue machine,” when the party controlled the government of Ontario for 40 consecutive years.

    Durable persona

    Here, Ford’s success is much deeper than a matter of suave electoral maneuvering, and it is more long-standing than the recent confrontation with the Trump administration. Instead, these results attest to the fact that, while the Premier is not without his detractors, he has nevertheless managed to secure a stable, solid and sufficient base of support through the combination of both a carefully balanced policy agenda and a durable leadership persona.

    As with his successful conservative predecessors, Ford practices a form of the pragmatic and moderate governance that characterizes Ontario. A large part of what makes this successful is the fact that while it makes policy decisions flexible, it does not make them arbitrary.

    Ford continues to emphasize a government oriented around continual economic growth and innovation as a means to accomplish raising living standards, fund the province’s social programs and — more recently — rival the United States. Combined with Ford’s aptitude in retail politics this has created a clear and accessible political project supported by big developers, small business owners and private-sector workers’ unions.

    In a political environment shaped by personality, Ford continues to suck up the majority of the political oxygen in Ontario. Even while a good portion of Ontarians may dislike Ford — he is far from the most popular of Canada’s premiers — they have not experienced an overriding need to get rid of the incumbent, nor pursue another course of change.

    While politics is impossible to predict, it suggests that this state of continuity will persist in Ontario, even amid a chaotic global environment.

    Sam Routley does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    – ref. It was risky for Ontario Premier Doug Ford to call an early election — but it paid off – https://theconversation.com/it-was-risky-for-ontario-premier-doug-ford-to-call-an-early-election-but-it-paid-off-251142

    MIL OSI – Global Reports –

  • MIL-OSI Canada: Alberta Francophonie Month: Ministers Fir and Glubish | Déclaration des ministres Fir et Glubish à l’occasion du Mois de la francophonie albertaine

    “This month, we recognize the vital contributions of French-speaking Albertans to our communities, culture and economy. Raising the Franco-Albertan flag is a proud tribute to our shared heritage and bright future.

    “French is the second-most spoken language in Alberta, with over 260,000 speakers who either speak it as their mother tongue or use it at home. Their role in enriching our culture, fostering economic development and strengthening diversity, is invaluable.

    “Alberta’s government remains committed to enhancing French-language services to better serve French-speaking Albertans. Over the past year, we have made meaningful progress in justice, health, child care, and we will continue working to expand access and opportunities.

    “We also recognize the invaluable efforts of our partners—community leaders, educators, non-profits and businesses—who drive the continued growth and vitality of Alberta’s Francophonie.

    “Their dedication strengthens our province.

    “To everyone who nurtures and preserves our francophone heritage, thank you.

    “This month, I invite all Albertans to take part in the celebrations, explore the richness of our shared history and support the continued vibrancy of the Francophonie in Alberta.”

    Tanya Fir, Minister of Arts, Culture and Status of Women

    “One of the greatest gifts my parents ever gave me was sending me to a French immersion program when I was younger. Being immersed in French from an early age was transformative. It expanded my worldview, gave me access to diverse cultural experiences, and instilled in me a lifelong love for languages.

    “Now, as a parent, I am thrilled to pass on this legacy to my son. Enrolling him in a French immersion kindergarten program was a decision rooted in the desire to give him the same opportunities I had. Watching him learn and speak French, I am filled with pride and optimism for his future. We practice French at home, making language learning a family affair.

    “Francophonie Month is an excellent opportunity to celebrate the contributions of the francophone community in Alberta. It is a time to reflect on the importance of linguistic diversity and to honour the resilience and passion of those who keep the French language alive.

    “Alberta’s francophones have made, and continue to make, invaluable contributions to our province. Let us celebrate their legacy and work towards a future that embraces and celebrates bilingualism.”

    Nate Glubish, Minister of Technology and Innovation and Francophone Community Liaison

    Madame Tanya Fir, ministre des Arts, de la Culture et de la Condition féminine, et monsieur Nate Glubish, ministre de la Technologie et de l’Innovation, ont fait la déclaration suivante à l’occasion du Mois de la francophonie albertaine :

    « Ce mois-ci, nous reconnaissons les contributions fondamentales des Albertaines et des Albertains francophones à nos communautés, à notre culture et à notre économie. En levant le drapeau franco-albertain, nous rendons un fier hommage à notre patrimoine commun et à un avenir prometteur pour toutes et tous.

    « Plus de 260 000 personnes ont le français comme langue maternelle ou l’utilisent à la maison, ce qui classe cette langue au deuxième rang des langues parlées en Alberta. Ces gens jouent un rôle inestimable dans l’enrichissement de notre culture, le développement de notre économie et le renforcement de notre diversité.

    « Le gouvernement de l’Alberta reste déterminé à améliorer les services en français dans le but de mieux servir la francophonie albertaine. Au cours de la dernière année, nous avons réalisé des progrès importants dans les domaines de la justice, de la santé et de la garde d’enfants, et nous continuerons à travailler pour améliorer l’accès à ces services et multiplier les possibilités.

    « Nous reconnaissons également les précieux efforts de nos partenaires ? dirigeants communautaires, éducateurs, organismes sans but lucratif et entreprises ? qui sont à l’origine de la croissance et de la vitalité continues de la francophonie albertaine.

    « Leur dévouement renforce notre province.

    « À toutes celles et tous ceux qui enrichissent et préservent notre patrimoine francophone, je dis merci.

    « Ce mois-ci, j’invite toute la population albertaine à prendre part aux célébrations, à découvrir la richesse de notre histoire commune et à soutenir le dynamisme continu de la francophonie en Alberta. »

    Tanya Fir, ministre des Arts, de la Culture et de la Condition féminine

    « L’un des plus beaux cadeaux que mes parents m’ont offerts a été de m’inscrire dans un programme d’immersion française dès mon plus jeune âge. Cette éducation a profondément marqué mon parcours : elle a élargi ma vision du monde, m’a ouvert les portes à de nouvelles expériences culturelles et m’a transmis un amour des langues qui m’accompagnera toute ma vie.

    « Aujourd’hui, en tant que parent, je suis heureux de transmettre cet héritage à mon fils. En l’inscrivant à un programme d’immersion française dès la maternelle, j’ai voulu lui donner des chances égales à celles que j’avais eues. Quand je le regarde apprendre le français et s’exprimer dans cette langue, je suis rempli de fierté et d’optimisme pour son avenir. À la maison, nous pratiquons le français au quotidien, ce qui nous permet de vivre notre apprentissage des langues en famille.

    « Le Mois de la francophonie est une excellente occasion de célébrer les contributions de la communauté francophone de l’Alberta. Cette célébration nous invite à réfléchir à l’importance de la diversité linguistique et à honorer la résilience et la passion de celles et ceux qui se font un devoir de préserver la langue française.

    « Les francophones de l’Alberta ont joué, et continuent de jouer, un rôle essentiel dans l’enrichissement de notre province. Célébrons leur héritage et œuvrons ensemble pour bâtir un avenir qui honore et valorise pleinement le bilinguisme. »

    Nate Glubish, ministre de la Technologie et de l’Innovation et agent de liaison avec la communauté francophone

    MIL OSI Canada News –

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Government and Nuffield Health support NHS staff get back to work

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    Press release

    Government and Nuffield Health support NHS staff get back to work

    Thousands of frontline NHS staff to benefit from a free rehabilitation programme with Nuffield Health to get them back to work.

    • The partnership will support thousands of NHS workers suffering from chronic joint conditions like arthritis or back pain
    • Musculoskeletal (MSK) conditions are second leading cause of absence among NHS staff, and this initiative will help them regain quality of life
    • Programme will help deliver Plan for Change’s ambition to build an NHS fit for the future and shift healthcare from hospitals to community

    Four thousand frontline NHS staff will benefit from a free rehabilitation programme Nuffield Health are rolling out in partnership with the government to get them back to work, the Health and Social Care Secretary announced today.

    Nuffield Health’s Joint Pain Programme will support NHS workers with chronic and long-term joint conditions like arthritis, helping them regain their quality of life and focus on bringing down waiting lists. 

    It will work with NHS teams to identity staff suitable for the programme and initially offer it at 10 trusts in London, Birmingham and the North West before a national rollout later this year.

    Musculoskeletal (MSK) conditions are the second leading cause of absence among NHS staff, and this groundbreaking partnership will help them recover and focus on supporting patients.

    Health and Social Care Secretary Wes Streeting said:

    NHS staff cannot treat patients if they’re in debilitating pain themselves.

    This partnership with Nuffield Health will help get thousands of NHS staff back to work, improve their quality of life, and allow them to continue to cut waiting lists.

    We’ll care for them so they can care for us and deliver our Plan for Change’s goal to build an NHS fit for the future.

    Alex Perry, CEO, Nuffield Health said:

    Nuffield Health’s mission is to build a healthier nation and our free-to-access Joint Pain Programme is a key part of that. This unique programme has helped over 35,000 people to date improve their health and quality of life.

    By offering this free programme directly to NHS staff—including nurses, porters, and paramedics—we are providing them with support to recover, return to work, and continue delivering essential care.

    This not only improves their health but also reduces pressure on the NHS by lowering sickness absence and keeping skilled staff where they are needed most

    In August 2024, more than two million days were lost due to NHS staff sickness.

    Back and musculoskeletal problems led to over 314,000 lost days and over 10,000 members of staff off.

    Nuffield Health’s programme has already benefitted 35,000 people, and participants experienced 35% improvement in joint pain and 37% improvement in joint function after taking part in 2024.

    On top of this, it prevented 86,226 sick days and resulted in a 29% reduction in GP appointments in 2024.

    The programme will deliver the Plan for Change’s ambition to build an NHS fit for the future as part of a decade of national renewal.

    It provides 12 weeks of exercise and support led by a personal trainer who has been upskilled to deliver rehabilitation programmes, followed by 12 weeks of access to Nuffield Health fitness facilities – all at no cost.

    It will help keep NHS staff healthy and fulfil one of the 10 Year Health Plan’s key ambitions of shifting care from hospital into the community.

    Keeping more NHS staff at work will boost productivity – ensuring they can focus on delivering the highest-quality care for patients and continue to cut waiting lists.

    Between July and November last year, the NHS carried out almost 2.2 million more elective care appointments compared to the same period the previous year – delivering on the government’s mission to fix the NHS. 

    The government reached the target seven months earlier than promised – with 100,000 more treatments, tests, and scans for patients each week, and more than half a million extra diagnostic tests delivered.

    It follows figures published this month which showed the waiting list has been cut by almost 160,000 since the government took office, compared to a rise of almost 33,000 over the same period the previous year. 

    The Health and Social Care Secretary announced the partnership at an event attended by 100 NHS staff in Peterborough earlier this week to gather their views on how to fix the health service.

    The public engagement event will help shape the government’s 10 Year Health Plan and forms part of a nationwide series of debates about how to make the NHS fit for the future.

    Ministers and NHS clinicians have carried out engagement events with NHS workers throughout this month – while thousands of NHS staff and the wider public have already submitted a range of ideas on Change NHS. These ideas will inform the government’s Plan for Change, which will drive a decade of national renewal and transform the health service.

    A new survey has recently been launched on the page, focusing on patient choice, how to support staff to care for patients, and using technology to improve people’s experiences of the NHS.

    Notes to editors

    The Joint Pain Programme will be available to NHS staff in the following Nuffield Health locations:

    • Wandsworth
    • Wandsworth Southside
    • City
    • Covent Garden
    • Shoreditch
    • Paddington
    • Battersea
    • Chiselhurst
    • Fulham
    • Wimbledon
    • Twickenham
    • Brondesbury Park
    • Stoke Poges
    • Friern Barnet Hendon
    • Birmingham Central
    • Preston
    • Bolton

    Updates to this page

    Published 1 March 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Secretary Wright Leads AI Collaboration Event from Oak Ridge National Lab

    Source: US Department of Energy

    OAK RIDGE, TENN.—U.S. Secretary of Energy Chris Wright, Senator Bill Hagerty (R-Tenn.), Chairman of House Committee on Energy and Waters Chuck Fleischmann (R-Tenn.), and Greg Brockman, OpenAI President and Co-Founder released the following statements after participating in the launch of an AI collaboration session involving more than 1,000 Energy Department scientists and OpenAI employees.

    “More than 70 years ago, experts from the Department of Energy’s Oak Ridge National Lab joined with innovators from around the United States in one of the greatest scientific and engineering accomplishments in history: the Manhattan Project,” Secretary Wright said. “We’re at the start of a new Manhattan Project. With President Trump’s leadership, the United States will win the global AI race, but first, we must unleash our energy dominance and restore American competitiveness. Today’s collaboration of DOE’s national labs and technology companies is an important step in our efforts to secure America’s future.”

    “It was great to join Secretary Wright and Representative Chuck Fleischmann this morning in Oak Ridge,” Senator Hagerty said. “In order for the U.S. to win the Artificial Intelligence race, we need computing power and energy, and Tennessee has both. The U.S. can lead in this space with the Volunteer State at the tip of the spear. I am more than confident that we can achieve this under President Trump’s leadership.”

    “I’m honored to have welcomed Energy Secretary Chris Wright to East Tennessee and the Oak Ridge National Laboratory to showcase the groundbreaking work ORNL is doing to advance breakthroughs in AI, develop new nuclear that will create America’s New Nuclear Future which is necessary to power our nation through the 21st Century and strengthen our national and energy security,” Chairman Fleischmann said. Secretary Wright’s visit, I’ve seen his determination to deliver on President Trump’s agenda to unleash American energy and innovation, and I look forward to partnering with Sec. Wright over the next four years to create America’s New Golden Age, win the AI Arms Race, and make our country energy dominant again.”

    “Advancing scientific research is one of the most promising applications of AI. We’re proud to work with the U.S. national labs to put our advanced technology into the hands of our country’s top scientists,” Brockman said. “OpenAI believes working closely with the U.S. government is essential to unlocking AI’s full potential. I want to thank Secretary Wright for his commitment to ensuring the U.S. continues to lead on AI, including through public-private collaborations like today’s event.”  

    BACKGROUND:

    Secretary Wright joined Senator Hagerty, Chairman Fleischmann and Greg Brockman at the “1,000 Scientist AI Jam Session” on Friday, February 28. This first-of-its-kind event co-hosted by OpenAI and nine of the U.S. Department of Energy’s national labs explored how AI can accelerate scientific discovery.

    Nine labs, including Argonne, Berkeley, Brookhaven, Idaho, Livermore, Los Alamos, Oak Ridge, Pacific Northwest, and Princeton Plasma Physics. It hosted more than 1,000 of America’s leading scientists for the day-long event. Participants had access to leading frontier AI models to test research applications, evaluate model responses, and help improve future AI systems. 

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: ‘World’s first’ dual-fuel ammonia-powered vessel arrives in the UK

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    Press release

    ‘World’s first’ dual-fuel ammonia-powered vessel arrives in the UK

    ‘Fortescue Green Pioneer successfully demonstrates what a future of cleaner shipping could look like’

    Fortescue Green Pioneer arrives in the UK

    The UK has welcomed the world’s first dual-fuelled ammonia-powered vessel to its shores, marking an important step forward in maritime decarbonisation.

    The Singapore-flagged vessel Fortescue Green Pioneer has arrived in the UK to demonstrate the viability of ammonia as a sustainable marine fuel. The vessel is the first of its kind, powered by a four-stroke engine, two of which are capable of being fuelled by ammonia and diesel.

    Ammonia, a zero-carbon fuel, has the potential to substantially reduce greenhouse gas emissions when used for shipping. An ammonia-powered vessel exemplifies how shipping can become more sustainable, an ambitious but essential mission fully backed by UK Government. 

    To support Fortescue Green Pioneer’s time in the UK, the vessel and team have been working closely with the Maritime and Coastguard Agency (MCA) to ensure full compliance with UK regulatory requirements.

    Fortescue Green Pioneer has today docked at the Port of Southampton, where Port State Control inspections will be conducted by the MCA’s Survey and Inspection team.

    The vessel will then travel to West India Dock in London, operated by Canal and River Trust, to showcase its technology and capabilities to key maritime stakeholders, partners and the public.

    Maritime Minister Mike Kane said: 

    It’s great to welcome this pioneering, first-of-a-kind vessel to UK shores – this is exactly the kind of innovation that will drive forward decarbonisation in the shipping sector. 

    Through our UK SHORE programme, we are committed to supporting the technology and alternative fuels needed to make zero-emission shipping a reality and establishing the UK as a clean energy superpower.

    MCA Director of UK Customer Services Lars Lippuner said:

    Decarbonisation in the maritime sector is a huge priority for the UK and shipping, and Fortescue Green Pioneer successfully demonstrates what a future of cleaner shipping could look like.

    The MCA will conduct thorough inspections and checks to ensure the vessel’s safety and operational readiness for its onward journey. It has been a pleasure working in collaboration with Fortescue to bring this innovative vessel to Europe, and we are excited that the shift to a more sustainable marine fuel and a world’s first is being showcased here in the UK.

    Fortescue Executive Chairman and Founder, Dr Andrew Forrest, said:

    We have brought the Fortescue Green Pioneer to the UK to deliver a simple message: This vessel encapsulates the innovation and character that has defined Fortescue’s mission to lead the world beyond fossil fuels.

    Over the coming months, global shipping regulators at the International Maritime Organization have the chance to fast-track shipping’s move away from dirty bunker fuel and embrace real zero fuel standards. With the right character and leadership, they can chart a course towards a more sustainable future for the planet and advance a dramatic reduction in shipping costs through the widespread adoption and scaling of renewable sources. This opportunity cannot be missed.

    BACKGROUND

    • The MCA works with operators and Classification Societies to regulate vessels using ammonia as a marine fuel, under the International Maritime Organization’s interim guidelines for using ammonia as fuel. This should be used in conjunction with the International Code of Safety for Ships Using Gases or Other Low-flashpoint Fuels (IGF Code). These guidelines can be used by owners or operators wishing to build new vessels or convert existing vessels to run on ammonia.
    • The MCA is currently working with other member states at the IMO to further develop the interim guidelines on the use of ammonia as a fuel with the expectation of them being reviewed, finalised and adopted into the main IGF code in the future.
    • As part of the requirements, the IGF Code requires that an Alternative Design Arrangement (ADA) is submitted to the Administration to be notified to the IMO. Full guidance on the ADA process is published in MSC Circular, MSC.1/Circ.1212, and should be closely followed by owners and operators prior to submission to the MCA as part of the plan approval process.
    • Ammonia can be used in existing marine diesel engines by carrying out appropriate modifications, which should be duly approved by the relevant Classification Society and the flag administration.

    Press office

    Email public.relations@mcga.gov.uk

    Press enquiries (Monday to Friday, 9am-5pm) 0203 817 2222

    Outside these hours or on bank holidays and weekends, for media enquiries ONLY, please send an email outlining your query and putting #Urgent in the subject title.

    Updates to this page

    Published 1 March 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom –

  • MIL-OSI Video: Cyber Expert’s Safety Tips & UN Chief Talks Humanitarian Crises | WEF | Top Stories Week

    Source: World Economic Forum (video statements)

    This week’s top stories of the week include:

    0:15 Online safety tips from cyber expert – Rupal Hollenbeck leads cybersecurity firm Check Point Software. Today’s online space is much more hyperconnected than it used to be, she says. Gen Z uses the internet in a different way to older users, says Hollenbeck, who may be alarmed at what young people choose to share online. But the cybersecurity industry needs to accept this new reality and ‘lean into it’, she says.

    4:16 UN chief talks humanitarian crises – In December, the UN released its annual review of the scale of worldwide need. In total, 305 million people need urgent humanitarian aid from Syria and sub-Saharan Africa to Myanmar, Venezuela and Ukraine. At the same time, 2024 was the deadliest year ever to be a humanitarian worker. Tom Fletcher took over the UN humanitarian affairs office in October. He says that while the task is daunting, multilateral cooperation is essential to success.

    8:49 How history can help leaders today – According to Mohit Joshi, CEO of Tech Mahindra, understanding history can shape better leaders by offering valuable insights into how societies adapt to change. As the world navigates the rapid transformation brought by the AI revolution, Joshi highlights how past events like the Industrial Revolution, the rise of railroads, and mechanization provide a template for understanding technological adoption and its long-term societal impact.

    12:00 Climate scientists’ warning to business – Even as the world strives to hit net-zero targets, things will get worse before they get better. But for businesses that take action today, there will be opportunities amid the upheaval. Every $1 that businesses invest in climate adaptation and resilience today could generate up to $19 in returns tomorrow. These benefits will appear from several directions, says Johan Rockström, Director of Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research.

    _____________________________________________

    The World Economic Forum is the International Organization for Public-Private Cooperation. The Forum engages the foremost political, business, cultural and other leaders of society to shape global, regional and industry agendas. We believe that progress happens by bringing together people from all walks of life who have the drive and the influence to make positive change.

    World Economic Forum Website ► http://www.weforum.org/
    Facebook ► https://www.facebook.com/worldeconomicforum/
    YouTube ► https://www.youtube.com/wef
    Instagram ► https://www.instagram.com/worldeconomicforum/ 
    Twitter ► https://twitter.com/wef
    LinkedIn ► https://www.linkedin.com/company/world-economic-forum
    TikTok ► https://www.tiktok.com/@worldeconomicforum
    Flipboard ► https://flipboard.com/@WEF

    #WorldEconomicForum

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XqaNb1gBykE

    MIL OSI Video –

  • MIL-Evening Report: Palestine asks ICJ for advisory opinion on illegal occupier Israel’s obligations

    More than 180 remained in detention without a clear indication of when or if they would be released, the physicians’ report said.

    “Detainees endure physical, psychological and sexual abuse as well as starvation and medical neglect amounting to torture,” the report said, denouncing a “deeply ingrained policy”.

    Healthcare workers were beaten, threatened, and forced to sign documents in Hebrew during their detention, according to the report based on 20 testimonies collected in prison.

    “Medical personnel were primarily questioned about the Israeli hostages, tunnels, hospital structures and Hamas’s activity,” it said.

    “They were rarely asked questions linking them to any criminal activity, nor were they presented with substantive charges.”

    New Zealand protesters calling for the continuation of the Gaza ceasefire and for peace and justice in Palestine in a march along the Auckland waterfront today. Image: Asia Pacific Report

    Where does Trump stand on the Gaza ceasefire?
     With phase one of the ceasefire due to end today and negotiations barely started on phase two, serious fears are being raised over  the viability of the ceasefire.

    President Donald Trump took credit for the truce that his Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff helped push across the finish line after a year of negotiations led by the Biden administration, Egypt and Qatar, reports Al Jazeera.

    Advocate Maher Nazzal at today’s New Zealand rally for Gaza in Auckland . . . he was elected co-leader of the Palestine Solidarity Network Aotearoa last weekend. Image: Asia Pacific Report

    However, Trump has since sent mixed signals about the deal.

    Earlier last month, he set a firm deadline for Hamas to release all the captives, warning “all hell is going to break out” if it didn’t.

    But he said it was ultimately up to Israel, and the deadline came and went.

    Trump sowed further confusion by proposing that Gaza’s population of about 2.3 million be relocated to other countries and for the US to take over the territory and develop it.

    Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu welcomed the idea, but it was universally rejected by Palestinians and Arab countries, including close US allies. Human rights groups said it could violate international law.

    Trump stood by the plan in a Fox News interview over the weekend but said he was “not forcing it”.


    ‘Finally’ an effort to hold the US accountable, says Al-Haq director
    Palestinian human rights activist Shawan Jabarin has welcomed a plea by the US-based rights group DAWN for the International Criminal Court (ICC) to investigate Joe Biden and senior US officials for aiding Israeli war crimes in Gaza.

    In a video posted by DAWN, Jabarin, director of the Palestinian rights group Al-Haq, said the effort was long overdue.

    “For decades we have called on the international community to hold Israel accountable for its violations of international law, but time and again, the US has used its power and influence to block that accountability, to shield Israel from consequences and to ensure that it can continue its crimes with impunity,” Jabarin said.

    “Now, finally, we see an effort to hold not just Israeli officials accountable but also those who have made these crimes possible: US officials who have armed, financed, and politically defended Israeli atrocities.”

    A father piggybacks his sleepy child during the New Zealand solidarity protest for Palestine in Auckland’s Viaduct today. Image: Asia Pacific Report

    Article by AsiaPacificReport.nz

    MIL OSI Analysis – EveningReport.nz –

  • MIL-OSI Economics: Trump’s NIH funding cuts and freezes raise concerns over US biotech drug development and innovation, reveals GlobalData

    Source: GlobalData

    Trump’s NIH funding cuts and freezes raise concerns over US biotech drug development and innovation, reveals GlobalData

    Posted in Business Fundamentals

    The US President Donald Trump began his second term with a series of directives targeting the US National Institutes of Health (NIH), creating uncertainty around NIH grant funding for biopharmaceutical drug development. With over $1.4 billion in NIH Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) and Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) grants involving innovator drugs awarded between 2020 and 2024, the funding cuts and freezes could hamper biopharmaceutical innovation and limit patient access to drugs, reveals GlobalData, a leading data and analytics company.

    The US NIH is the largest funder of biomedical research globally, providing federal government funding to US-based early-stage small businesses through its SBIR and STTR programs to drive innovation with a focus on commercialization.

    Alison Labya, Business Fundamentals Analyst at GlobalData, comments: “Biotech startups rely on government grants to fund early-stage biopharmaceutical research and development (R&D), where attracting venture capital is challenging unless a clear return on investment is evident.”

    According to GlobalData’s Pharma Intelligence Center Grants Database, SBIR and STTR grants involving innovator drugs saw a 37% increase in total grant value from $237 million in 2020 to $326 million in 2024. Over 80% of SBIR and STTR grants were awarded for preclinical and discovery-stage drugs, amounting to over $1.1 billion between 2020 and 2024, reflecting the support NIH SBIR and STTR grant funding provides to early-stage R&D.

    Labya continues: “Infectious disease was the top therapy area for preclinical and discovery-stage SBIR and grants with a total grant value of $295 million from 2020 to 2024, followed by central nervous system with $241 million. However, infectious disease drug development could see a downturn in NIH grant funding under the leadership of Robert F Kennedy Jr.—Trump’s newly appointed head of the US Department of Health and Human Services—who has previously commented plans to shift research away from infectious diseases.”

    A notable NIH reform rolled out by Trump was a $4 billion cut to overhead funding for biomedical research by reducing “indirect” costs on grants to 15%. This follows other restrictions that were imposed on the NIH, including abrupt cancellations of grant review panels without reschedule, delaying access to grant funding.

    Similarly, Trump issued a 90-day funding freeze and stop-work order for the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), disrupting USAID-funded clinical trials globally.

    Labya concludes: “The Trump administration communicated its intent to review and redirect federal spending away from grant programs that do not align with Trump’s ideological agenda, signalling increased stringency in the allocation of NIH grant funding, with grant applications referencing diversity in preclinical and clinical drug development potentially facing challenges.

    “Trump’s recent federal funding cuts and freezes could stifle innovation by creating cash flow challenges for biotech companies that rely on government grants, which could delay or halt global biopharmaceutical R&D and drug approvals, limiting patient access to essential treatments.”

    Note: Data in the chart includes all announced and completed SBIR and STTR grants received by a company from 2020 to 2024 involving at least one innovator drug.

    MIL OSI Economics –