Category: Politics

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Over $21 million to transform New South Wales’ regional cities

    Source: Australian Ministers 1

    The Albanese Government is building Australia’s future by delivering social infrastructure that connects communities, boosts economies and transforms Australia’s regions.

    Today we are announcing four projects will share in over $21 million to create new and revitalise existing town precincts across regional New South Wales. 

    In Cessnock, over $14 million is going towards transforming the underutilised Apex Park into a thriving precinct connecting local businesses, community groups, service providers and the Cessnock Pool recreation area.

    The new precinct will transform Cessnock for locals and visitors alike, shaping the future of the town and strengthening its role as a tourism gateway to the Hunter Valley region.

    Further west, we’re investing $2 million into the Mid-Western Regional Council’s Mortimer Street Precinct to revitalise the south-eastern section of the Mudgee CBD. 

    The project will deliver plans to accommodate a hotel, residential apartments, commercial shops, restaurants, car parks, green spaces and designated pedestrian connections. It will enable the precinct to progress to Development Application and investment.

    Bathurst Regional Council’s Connected Regional Neighbourhoods project will receive $1.7 million to develop a comprehensive business case, master plan and concept designs to reinvigorate the Bathurst CBD. 

    The project will set a benchmark for the use of smart, sustainable technologies in a regional city, incorporating active transport infrastructure and streetscape enhancements to attract investment into the town.

    In Cobar, almost $3.5 million will deliver the design and planning works for the council’s Grand Precinct, getting it up to construction and tender-ready status. 

    The project will transform the town by redesigning the Grand Hotel into a cultural-commercial hub, upgrading the library with enhanced services, restoring the town hall for multi-purpose use, adding senior housing and improving streetscapes. 

    These projects showcase the Government’s commitment to listening to, and working with, local communities, and addressing regional needs.

    They are funded through the Albanese Government’s regional Precincts and Partnership Program, which provides investment to transform regional, rural and remote places. 

    The program is investing $47.9 million to support the transformation of seven precincts across New South Wales. For more information, visit: infrastructure.gov.au/regional

    Quotes attributable to Minister for Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development and Local Government Catherine King: 

    “Precincts like this not only give the community a space to gather and visitors a space to enjoy, but they transform towns by boosting local economies and shaping the everyday lives of locals.

    “The regional Precincts and Partnerships program is about revitalising underutilised spaces to enhance regional cities and towns – working collaboratively across government, community and with the private sector. 

    “We are listening to communities across regional New South Wales and boosting local economies by strengthening community infrastructure.”
     
    Quotes attributable to Member for Hunter Dan Repacholi: 

    “This investment is a game-changer for Cessnock, ensuring our region continues to grow, attract visitors, and provide better amenities for locals.

    “Our community has been asking for these improvements, and I’m proud to be delivering real outcomes that will make a lasting difference.

    “The Albanese Government is committed to supporting regional New South Wales, and this funding will help build a stronger, more connected future for Cessnock and beyond.”

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-Evening Report: ‘A shameful call by Creative Australia’: the arts community reacts to Khaled Sabsabi being dropped from the Venice Biennale

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Cecelia Cmielewski, Research Fellow, Institute for Culture and Society, Western Sydney University

    To be selected as the artist and curator team to represent Australia at the Venice Biennale is considered the ultimate exhibition for an artistic team. To have your selection rescinded, as has now happened to the 2026 team of Khaled Sabsabi and curator Michael Dagostino, is without precedent.

    Australia has presented at the biennale since 1954, and is one of 29 countries to have a permanent pavilion. Last year, Archie Moore was the first Australian to win the Golden Lion for best national pavilion.

    The selection of an artist and curator pair is managed by Creative Australia. The arts funding body appoints a committee of visual artists and industry experts to form a shortlist of six teams, and make the final selection.

    The announcement on February 7 of Sabsabi and Dagostino was widely celebrated as creatively bold and inclusive.

    On Thursday, opposition arts spokesperson, Claire Chandler, questioned Sabsabi’s selection in the Senate. She cited a 2007 work that featured Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah, and said the artist had made work “promoting” Osama bin Laden.

    In a statement released on Thursday night, Creative Australia said Sabsabi and Dagostino would no longer represent Australia at the biennale.

    The Creative Australia board, the statement said, “believes a prolonged and divisive debate about the 2026 selection outcome poses an unacceptable risk to public support for Australia’s artistic community”.

    On social media, the artistic community was swift in its condemnation. They criticised the paucity of understanding of Sabsabi’s artistic and community practice, and questioned the role of political interference and freedom of artistic expression.

    Artists called for the resignation of the Creative Australia board, and for a boycott of the Australian pavilion at the biennale.

    ‘A remarkable career’

    Before moving into visual arts, Sabsabi began his career as a hip-hop artist, known as Peacefender. In a career spanning more than 35 years, he has worked in video, mixed media and installation art, exhibiting around Australia and internationally.

    Media artist and academic John Gillies described Sabsabi as “a thoughtful and peaceful person” who has worked as a community arts worker in Palestinian refugee camps in Lebanon.

    The former head of the Sydney gallery Artspace, Nicholas Tsoutas, said Sabsabi “has had a remarkable career in contemporary art and his selection was so well deserved”.

    He praised the selection of Sabsabi as “an extraordinary opportunity to really advocate for artistic freedom for bringing [people] together”, and added this decision will “do the exact opposite”.

    ‘A sad day’

    Artist Kate Just said the board’s decision “undermines the expertise of the artist, curator, and the selection team. The decision fails to uphold the work of artists to interrogate complex personal and political histories and the urgent issues of our time.”

    Fiona Winning, former director of programming at Sydney Opera House, said it was “a shameful call by Creative Australia”. Artist Nigel Helyer expressed his belief this decision was “liable to emphasise cultural divides, rather than placate them”.

    Investment banker, art collector and philanthropist Simon Mordant, commented on Instagram he has “resigned as an Ambassador to the now cancelled project and withdrawn my financial support – this situation is unacceptable”.

    He suggested “the Pavilion should remain empty in solidarity with Khaled. A very dark day for Australia and the Arts”.

    Advocacy body National Association for the Visual Arts (commonly known as NAVA) released a statement saying “government interference in the expert panel’s selection process undermines the very principle of independence”.

    The decision, they said, “erodes public trust, alienates artists, and sparks widespread protest from those who stand with Sabsabi and Dagostino as a matter of principle”.

    ‘Artists reflect the times they live in’

    The five artistic teams who were shortlisted to represent Australia at the biennale have released a joint statement in support of Sabsabi.

    They called the selection process “rigorous and professionally independent” leading to the selection of a team with “artistic vision and courage”.

    Revoking support, they wrote, is “antithetical to the goodwill and hard-fought artistic independence, freedom of speech and moral courage that is at the core of arts in Australia”.

    In a statement, Sabsabi and Dagostino said “art should not be censored as artists reflect the times they live in”.

    “We intended to present a transformational work in Venice, an experience that would unite all audiences in an open and safe shared space,” they said.

    As the artistic community is showing, this decision has raised a debate on what artists are allowed to say in Australia and brings into question the independence of Creative Australia.

    Cecelia Cmielewski does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. ‘A shameful call by Creative Australia’: the arts community reacts to Khaled Sabsabi being dropped from the Venice Biennale – https://theconversation.com/a-shameful-call-by-creative-australia-the-arts-community-reacts-to-khaled-sabsabi-being-dropped-from-the-venice-biennale-249941

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: Census to be conducted next year

    Source: Hong Kong Information Services

    The 2026 Population Census will be held from January 1 to December 31, 2026.

    The Census & Statistics (2026 Population Census) Order was published in the Government Gazette today.

    To modernise and reform Hong Kong’s approach to censuses, several new initiatives will be implemented in the 2026 Population Census, such that only around one-tenth of the population will be subject to detailed enquiry by long-form questionnaire.

    Government administrative data will be used more extensively to supplement survey data with a view to reducing the reporting burden on respondents.

    A small-scale test survey for the 2026 Population Census will be conducted from April to July this year.

    Sampled households are encouraged to participate in the census through online questionnaires. They may also choose to provide the requested information by telephone interview.

    Census & Statistics Department Census officers will visit households who have not completed their questionnaires to collect the requested information.

    Households selected to participate in the census will receive a household notification letter issued by the department. If households have not provided telephone numbers to the department, it will not initiate phone calls to them.

    When visiting households, census officers will wear a vest uniform and carry a government or enumerator identity card and a Census Officer Certificate of Identity issued by the department.

    The department will implement strict procedures to handle all data collected and will only release statistics that do not reveal the identity of the individuals involved.

    All completed questionnaires, in both paper and electronic forms, will be destroyed on or before December 31, 2027.

    The order will be tabled at the Legislative Council for negative vetting on February 19.

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News

  • MIL-Evening Report: Dingoes are being culled in Victoria. How much harm to the species is needed to protect commercial profits?

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Danielle Ireland-Piper, Associate Professor, ANU National Security College, Australian National University

    A Victorian government decision to allow dingo culling in the state’s east until 2028 has reignited debate over what has been dubbed Australia’s most controversial animal.

    Animals Australia, an animal welfare group, has filed proceedings in the Supreme Court of Victoria, challenging the decision. The case is due to be heard this year.

    Announcing the legal action, the group said the eradication program targeted a unique native animal at risk of extinction, and ignored pleas from Traditional Owners who “treasure the dingo as a totem species”.

    The controversy raises a few thorny questions. Are dingoes an important native species or an agricultural pest? And what is the right balance between protecting the species, and protecting the interests of farmers?

    What’s this all about?

    Dingoes are listed as vulnerable in Victoria. This means the species faces a high risk of extinction in the wild over the medium term.

    Dingoes are also protected under Victoria’s Wildlife Act – unless a special order is made to declare them “unprotected”. To date, these unprotection orders have been made when authorities deem it necessary to prevent dingoes from killing livestock.

    An unprotection order means a person can legally kill dingoes in certain areas of private and public land, by trapping, poisoning or shooting.

    Since around 2010, a succession of unprotection orders have allowed dingoes to be killed in various parts of Victoria. The unprotection order now being challenged came into effect on October 1 last year and will continue until January 1, 2028.

    Announcing the decision, Victoria’s Environment Minister Steve Dimopoulos says the government was:

    striking the right balance between protecting our vulnerable dingo populations while giving farmers the ability to protect their livestock, and we will regularly engage to ensure settings continue to achieve this balance.

    Dingoes are not ‘wild dogs’

    DNA studies suggest dingoes have been in Australia for between 4,600 and 18,000 years. Often wrongly described as “wild dogs”, they are [actually descended from south Asian wolves](https://environment.desi.qld.gov.au/wildlife/animals/living-with/dingoes#:~:text=The%20dingo—Australia’s%20only%20native,role%20in%20the%20natural%20environment.Sustainable dingo management (and public sympathies either way).

    Adding to the complications, it can be hard to distinguish between a wild dog and a dingo without DNA testing.

    Dingoes were once widespread across Victoria but are now extinct across most of the state, save for two populations in the state’s north and east.

    Conservationists and scientists fear the extended order in eastern Victoria may push dingoes to local extinction

    The experience in north-west Victoria offers a cautionary tale. There, under a dingo unprotection order, the population dropped to as few as 40 individuals. The local dingo population was deemed “critically low and at risk of extinction”, prompting the government to reinstate dingo protections.

    In eastern Victoria, the dingo population is estimated at between 2,640 and 8,800.

    However in September last year, before the unprotection order in eastern Victoria came into effect, Nationals Member for Gippsland, Tim Bull, claimed 1,500 dingoes were already being killed in the region each year by farmers and others.

    If those figures are correct, it suggests extending the unprotection order until 2028 will devastate the dingo population in eastern Victoria.

    A decline in dingo populations is not just a concern for the species itself – it will have knock-on effects.

    Dingoes are apex predators and research shows they are central to how ecosystems function. They can help control introduced predators such as foxes, feral cats and rabbits. This benefits native animals and plants.

    Is the balance right?

    Given the risks to dingo populations and the broader environment, it’s pertinent to ask if the government decision swings too far towards protecting agricultural production.

    One report suggests within Victoria’s 16 “wild dog management zones” in the 2022–23 financial year, there were more than 1.7 million head of livestock. Of these, 1,455 were confirmed killed by dingoes. While understandably of concern to farmers, this nonetheless represents a tiny proportion of total stock numbers.

    The number of sheep killed by dingoes is also only a fraction of the 14.6 million currently farmed in Victoria. Sheep are not at risk of extinction.

    These numbers suggest the government has not struck the right balance between protecting livestock and ensuing dingo populations survive.

    Considering the rights of Traditional Owners

    When weighing up an unprotection order, a minister must consider how it affects the rights of Traditional Owners.

    In 2023, when deliberating over whether to make an unprotection order in eastern Victoria, the Victorian government stated that for Aboriginal people:

    • dingoes are part of their living cultural heritage

    • the loss of a dingo is akin to the loss of a family member

    • the dingo helps maintain connection to Country

    • some have a totemic and kinship relationship with the dingo.

    The government said while the order would limit Aboriginal people’s rights, this was justified when taking other factors into account.

    The court will decide

    Animal protection group Animals Australia has filed proceedings in the Supreme Court of Victoria, challenging the lawfulness and validity of the unprotection order. Court documents are not yet publicly available.

    Australia does not have a single and consistent animal welfare and protection regime. Instead, protections are fractured between the states. That is why the current challenge to dingo culling is limited to Victoria, even though culling takes place in other states. This illustrates the difficulty in using the law to protect animals at a national level.

    This challenge is part of a broader push to redefine the relationship between humans and animals through what’s known as animal law. In recent years, animal advocates have used various aspects of the law to challenge the gassing of pigs before they are slaughtered, and recreational duck shooting.

    The current case is an important test for how the law balances the needs of humans and animals – and in particular, how much harm is deemed “necessary” at law to protect commercial profit and livelihood.

    Danielle Ireland-Piper does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. Dingoes are being culled in Victoria. How much harm to the species is needed to protect commercial profits? – https://theconversation.com/dingoes-are-being-culled-in-victoria-how-much-harm-to-the-species-is-needed-to-protect-commercial-profits-245759

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-Evening Report: Bracing for a monster: Tropical Cyclone Zelia is bearing down on WA. Here’s what to expect

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Steve Turton, Adjunct Professor of Environmental Geography, CQUniversity Australia

    Severe Tropical Cyclone Zelia is bearing down on the northwest coast of Australia and is likely to make landfall early Friday evening.

    It’s a monster storm of great concern to Western Australia. Port Hedland is the largest town in the firing line and also our busiest iron ore export port. Strong winds may extend to other areas along the coast, and inland to areas such as Marble Bar, Tom Price and Paraburdoo.

    Even if Zelia doesn’t hit towns directly, it’s likely to cause a lot of damage. The Bureau of Meteorology predicts extremely dangerous sustained winds of around 205 kilometers an hour and wind gusts higher still, at 290km/h. That’s strong enough to flatten homes, trees, power lines and other infrastructure.

    This is a category five cyclone, which is the most severe possible under the current scale. But as climate change worsens, authorities may need to add another category to the scale.

    Bureau of Meteorology video explaining the threat of Tropical Cyclone Zeila.

    Do we need a category 6?

    Elsewhere in the world, tropical cyclones are called hurricanes or typhoons.

    The severity of a tropical cyclone (or hurricane or typhoon) is ranked in categories from 1 (weakest) to 5 (strongest).

    Category one involves maximum average wind speed of up to 88km/h, and strongest gusts up to 125 km/h. It typically causes negligible damage to homes but may damage crops, trees and caravans.

    Category five, the most severe, is defined as “extremely dangerous”, causing widespread destruction of buildings and vegetation. These cyclones bring maximum average wind speeds greater than 200km/h and gusts greater than 279km/h.

    However, on a warming planet, cyclones are expected to become more intense. It’s also making tropical cyclones and hurricanes intensify more quickly.

    Some scientists have called for a category six for hurricanes, typhoons and cyclones with sustained wind speeds greater than 309km/h. They argue a new category is needed to communicate the risks associated with tropical cyclones fuelled by climate change.

    Bureau of Meteorology video explaining the threat of Tropical Cyclone Zeila.

    Climate change is feeding storms

    It’s too early to say if Cyclone Zelia is directly caused, or fuelled, by climate change. However, research over the last 30 years has found a link between global warming and more intense tropical cyclones.

    Globally, 2024 was Earth’s warmest year on record. Ocean heat content is increasing around most tropical seas, and other places where tropical cyclones are forming.
    Warmer oceans, and a warmer atmosphere, both feed energy into tropical cyclones, making them more intense and fast-forming when conditions are favourable.

    Zelia intensified from a category one into a five in just over 24 hours.

    Australia is currently experiencing record-breaking sea surface temperatures. The area off the northwest coast has been up to 4-5°C above normal this summer.

    Hurricane Milton, which struck the United States in October last year, also shows how climate change is making tropical cyclones worse. Amid very warm ocean temperatures, it intensified rapidly over the Gulf of Mexico to a category five hurricane.

    We can expect more of these severe cyclones in future, if humanity keeps warming up the oceans and the atmosphere.

    Slow is not good

    Climate change is slowing the forward motion of tropical cyclones over the ocean and land. That means they take longer to cross the coast and pass through an area – inflicting more damage from wind and storm surge, and dumping more rain.

    The Bureau of Meteorology says Cyclone Zelia’s “forward speed” is quite slow, at 11km/h. So, heavy rain and the strong winds will persist for quite a few hours before and after it crosses the coast.

    The strongest winds of a tropical cyclone are usually near the eye, but can extend for hundreds of kilometres. Sometimes, winds on opposite sides of the eye blow in different directions, causing destruction on the ground which damages buildings, infrastructure, farmland and the environment.



    Conditions on the ground

    At the moment around Port Hedland, winds are about 70-100km/h and rising. That’s gale force but not too alarming. Conditions will rapidly deteriorate into this afternoon, particularly to the east of Port Hedland.

    The storm has already dropped a lot of rain. This has caused local flooding and cut rail lines. But there’s more to come.

    The Bureau of Meteorology is also warning of a significant storm tide – when sea levels rise well above a typical high tide. This may lead to flooding and inundate coastal roads and properties.

    The cyclone will continue to trek inland over the weekend, gradually weakening as it goes. People in mining and Indigenous communities hundreds of kilometres inland could experience strong winds, heavy rain and flooding.

    The bureau is providing regular updates online. For those in the path of the cyclone visit www.emergency.wa.gov.au or download the Emergency WA app for the latest community alerts and warnings.

    Steve Turton has received funding from the Australian government.

    ref. Bracing for a monster: Tropical Cyclone Zelia is bearing down on WA. Here’s what to expect – https://theconversation.com/bracing-for-a-monster-tropical-cyclone-zelia-is-bearing-down-on-wa-heres-what-to-expect-249947

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Universities – Hon. Carmel Sepuloni talks Celebrity Treasure Island and imposter syndrome on return to University of Auckland

    Source: University of Auckland (UoA)

    New Zealand’s first Pacific Deputy Prime Minister Hon. Carmel Sepuloni returned to the place that became the catalyst for her political career, Waipapa Taumata Rau, the University of Auckland.

    Accompanied by fellow alumnus Labour MP Hon. Shanan Halbert, she spoke with a cohort of Māori and Pacific school leavers on 10 February as a guest of Unibound, the summer academic enrichment programme designed to ease students into university life.
     
    Despite having risen to the highest ranks of political life the Deputy Leader of the Opposition says she much prefers talking policy rather than sharing her own story.
     
    “It’s probably one of the most uncomfortable things to do. I’d much rather talk about policy and politics than my personal backstory. But I think it’s really important to come back here and talk to the students.”
     
    As a highly experienced politician Sepuloni (Samoa, Tonga and Pākehā) is used to Question Time. However it was likely her first Q&A session including questions about her time on Celebrity Treasure Island. In particular the challenge with media personality Gabby Solomona where both held a block together using only their feet.
     
    “Of course I got asked some questions about Celebrity Treasure Island and the challenge with Gabby and what that meant, and I could speak to the importance of that ‘duty of care’ we have to each other as part of being Pacific people, and how sometimes we will actually achieve more out of working with a sense of obligation to someone else, as opposed to just our own individual pursuits.”
     
    Sepuloni studied at the Auckland College of Education and later gained a Bachelor of Education and Diploma of Primary School Teaching with the University of Auckland. She also ran the University’s Tuakana programme as Equity Manager with the Faculty of Arts for five years, working predominantly with Māori and Pacific undergraduate students.
     
    “This was so very close to my own heart and also a catalyst for what got me into politics in the first place,” she says of her passion that also extended to working with youth who had fallen out of the schooling system.
     
    “It was my passion for education, for our Pacific community. My first hand witness to the inequities that exist for us as Pacific people in the education system.  And so I will always take up the opportunity to come back to the University of Auckland, particularly to see our Pacific students.”
     
    As well as the numerous questions about politics, the discussion turned to Imposter syndrome and Sepuloni was able to cast back to more than three decades ago when she was an undergraduate student at the University and the first in her family to venture into the tertiary space.
     
    “We talked about imposter syndrome and I mentioned that I actually had it as an undergrad student, because I was the first in my family, like many of them, to come to university.
     
    “So the space and the environment was quite unfamiliar and scary for me to start with. We talked about imposter syndrome in that setting, but I said that for many of us that are brown and women, that it’s something that that we may carry for life, but it isn’t necessarily to the same extent.”
     
    Speaking with the young audience, Sepuloni realised there were many shared similarities but was aware that time and progress had a made a difference.
     
    “I guess the thing that I’m cognizant of is these kids are so much younger than me.
    I’m standing there talking to them, and I realize that I could be their mother, reflecting and realizing it’s nearly been 30 years since I was a first-year university student. So I’m really mindful that despite the fact we’ll have some similarities and experience, and that some things haven’t changed that much, there is still, you know, a huge amount of difference between us.”
     
    Pro Vice-Chancellor Pacific Professor Jemaima Tiatia-Siau says having the Leader of the Opposition and the country’s first former Pacific female Deputy Prime Minister was an invaluable experience for the Unibound school leavers to realise what the future could hold in store for them.
     
    “This was an invaluable experience for our young people to be in the same room as the Hon. Carmel Sepuloni; the opportunity to ask her about her journey and the steps she took toward her accomplishments, it has made a great impression and given them motivation as they set out on the start of their tertiary journey.”
     
    Professor Tiatia-Siau also acknowledged ethnomusicologist and lecturer Sharon Televave along with UniBound acting manager Sara Toleafoa for bringing Sepuloni back to the University.
     
    “Vā Fealoa’i is a Samoan concept, which is about relationality. Similarly, Tauhi Vā is a Tongan concept about relationality. Nurturing vā or relationships, is essential in Pacific cultures, this made it seamless for us to contact the Hon Carmel Sepuloni, says Sharon Televave.
     
    As an alumni and former staff member of the University, Televave was hopeful the visit would plant seeds to empower our Pacific students about to embark on their academic journeys.

    MIL OSI New Zealand News

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Australian Deputy PM: Over $21 million to transform New South Wales’ regional cities

    Source: Minister of Infrastructure

    The Albanese Government is building Australia’s future by delivering social infrastructure that connects communities, boosts economies and transforms Australia’s regions.

    Today we are announcing four projects will share in over $21 million to create new and revitalise existing town precincts across regional New South Wales. 

    In Cessnock, over $14 million is going towards transforming the underutilised Apex Park into a thriving precinct connecting local businesses, community groups, service providers and the Cessnock Pool recreation area.

    The new precinct will transform Cessnock for locals and visitors alike, shaping the future of the town and strengthening its role as a tourism gateway to the Hunter Valley region.

    Further west, we’re investing $2 million into the Mid-Western Regional Council’s Mortimer Street Precinct to revitalise the south-eastern section of the Mudgee CBD. 

    The project will deliver plans to accommodate a hotel, residential apartments, commercial shops, restaurants, car parks, green spaces and designated pedestrian connections. It will enable the precinct to progress to Development Application and investment.

    Bathurst Regional Council’s Connected Regional Neighbourhoods project will receive $1.7 million to develop a comprehensive business case, master plan and concept designs to reinvigorate the Bathurst CBD. 

    The project will set a benchmark for the use of smart, sustainable technologies in a regional city, incorporating active transport infrastructure and streetscape enhancements to attract investment into the town.

    In Cobar, almost $3.5 million will deliver the design and planning works for the council’s Grand Precinct, getting it up to construction and tender-ready status. 

    The project will transform the town by redesigning the Grand Hotel into a cultural-commercial hub, upgrading the library with enhanced services, restoring the town hall for multi-purpose use, adding senior housing and improving streetscapes. 

    These projects showcase the Government’s commitment to listening to, and working with, local communities, and addressing regional needs.

    They are funded through the Albanese Government’s regional Precincts and Partnership Program, which provides investment to transform regional, rural and remote places. 

    The program is investing $47.9 million to support the transformation of seven precincts across New South Wales. For more information, visit: infrastructure.gov.au/regional

    Quotes attributable to Minister for Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development and Local Government Catherine King: 

    “Precincts like this not only give the community a space to gather and visitors a space to enjoy, but they transform towns by boosting local economies and shaping the everyday lives of locals.

    “The regional Precincts and Partnerships program is about revitalising underutilised spaces to enhance regional cities and towns – working collaboratively across government, community and with the private sector. 

    “We are listening to communities across regional New South Wales and boosting local economies by strengthening community infrastructure.”
     
    Quotes attributable to Member for Hunter Dan Repacholi: 

    “This investment is a game-changer for Cessnock, ensuring our region continues to grow, attract visitors, and provide better amenities for locals.

    “Our community has been asking for these improvements, and I’m proud to be delivering real outcomes that will make a lasting difference.

    “The Albanese Government is committed to supporting regional New South Wales, and this funding will help build a stronger, more connected future for Cessnock and beyond.”

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Press conference – Fairfield Connect

    Source: Australian Ministers for Education

    JASON CLARE, MINISTER FOR EDUCATION: Thanks to the mighty Western Sydney University. When I was a little kid growing up in Cabramatta, just down the road from here, decades ago, I remember lots of KFC logos, lots of Macca’s logos, Westfield logos, but not a lot of university logos. Lots of Big W shops but not enough of that big W. And I want to see more of it. I want more young people to think in Western Sydney, that, “Hey, uni can be for me too.” I want more young people to be on Smart Street in Fairfield. And that’s what this is all about.

    As a kid growing up in Western Sydney – and you guys know this too – for a lot of our mates, university just seemed like it was too far away and that it was somewhere else for someone else. This is about bringing university closer to us, to our communities, to where people live in the western suburbs of Sydney. But not just that. Also the western suburbs of Brisbane and Melbourne as well. Bringing university closer so more people get that life-changing chance that education can provide.

    Alphia, you mentioned this to me when we came in a little bit ago – it was about a year ago that we were here and that we cut the ribbon and opened this launchpad. And it really is a launchpad. And it reminded me that, all those years ago, I got my first job working right here. It wasn’t a university launchpad then, it wasn’t a Study Hub, it was the Woolies car park. I was collecting shopping trolleys for Woolies. And it’s not lost on me that now this is a Study Hub for our local community, where young people out of school can get a chance to do a law degree, or a business degree, or an engineering degree, or maybe medical science. A place that can change your life and a place that can change our community.

    About one in two people in their 30s today have a university degree, but not everywhere. Not in the outer suburbs of our big cities, not in the regions and not in the bush. You know, in a place like Fairfield, it’s only 12 per cent of the community that has a uni degree today. Mount Druitt, it’s about 19 per cent. In Inala, in the western suburbs of Brissie, it’s about 12 per cent as well. In Beenleigh, it’s about 9 per cent. That’s why what we’re doing here is important because when you bring university closer to where people live, it makes it a little bit easier to make that decision that, “Hey, I can do this too.”

    I used to get on the train at Cabramatta and catch it all the way to the city and then get on a bus from Central out to Randwick, it took an hour and a half each way. It was only about 10 minutes to get to Fairfield. As I went past here, I still had another hour and 15 minutes to go. Now, if we can bring university closer to our local communities, then we can change lives and we can change communities. We can help build communities where more people have the qualifications they need to get the jobs that they dream of and build the lives that they want. So, that’s what this is about – life-changing stuff.

    So, this funding helps to expand this centre, turn a launchpad into a real University Hub. But not just that. As you can see, funding to set up a hub like this in Liverpool as well. We announced one for Macquarie Fields just late last year and then a hub at Mount Druitt and Everton as well. And as I mentioned, Inala and Beenleigh in Queensland. All up, what we’re now doing is funding more than 70 of these hubs across the country. About 56 in the regions and the bush, and now, for the first time, 15 in the outer suburbs of our big cities.

    But it’s not just about the buildings, it’s about the lives that we will build and the lives that will change because of this. And I’ve got to say, the reason this launchpad exists, a big part of the credit goes to Western Sydney University. But, Maryanne, as you pointed out before, it also, a lot of the credit goes to the local representation in this community who fought for it for a very, very long time. And at the head of that is one of my best mates, we’ve known each other since before we ever had wrinkles or grey hair and we’ll be mates forever. He fought for it, he helped make it happen, and I’m so glad that we’re able to expand this centre today and turn it into a real University Hub. Can I introduce my friend Chris Bowen.

    CHRIS BOWEN, MINISTER FOR CLIMATE CHANGE AND ENERGY: Thanks very much, Jason. Well, when Jason and David and I were here launching Fairfield Connect almost exactly a year ago, since then 7,000 young people have used this facility. Uni students, Western Sydney Uni students, other universities, school students dreaming, wondering whether they could go to university have come through here. And I’ve got absolutely no doubt, as a result, have thought, “Yes, I can. Yes, I can. I can do this.”

    And today, Jason has locked in the future of this – I like to call it a campus – this campus of Western Sydney University, made sure it’s going to be permanent with this funding and made sure that we can increase the services available here. Mentoring, wrap-around services, wonderful fellow university students, academics talking to young people about how they’re going at university or at school, what more they can do, what help, and assistance is there, so they know that on that journey they are not alone. Their family is with them, but their community is with them too, their village is with them. And that’s so important. There’s always been a gap, in my view, in that wonderful institution of Western Sydney University. Great presences in Parramatta and Campbelltown and elsewhere. Always been a gap at Fairfield, a home to 200,000 people, didn’t have a Western Sydney University presence. I decided a little while ago that if we ever got the chance and got back to government, we’d fix that. And with the support of David as the state MP, we made complete pains of ourselves. And I was helped by the fact that Jason and I are Canberra flatmates. So, when he’d finish a hard day in Parliament and he’d get home to our place, he’d open the door and there’s me – perhaps with a glass of whisky – saying, “How’s that Fairfield Western Sydney Hub going, Jason?” And the last thing he needed after a busy day was hearing from me, so eventually we got there, with Jason’s leadership and passion as a fellow Western Sydney kid who got to university and then got to Parliament and then got to Cabinet. That makes a difference.

    So, today is a very special day for our community. As has been said, you can’t be what you can’t see. And it’s not just the 7,000 people who have been through. It’s the many thousands more who will walk past, maybe six years old, first they’ve heard of a university, out shopping with Mum and Dad, who think, “Oh, maybe that’s for me one day.” That’s what we’re doing here today.

    So, I’m just absolutely delighted. Obviously, I welcome as well the Mount Druitt and Liverpool Hubs because Western Sydney is one community. But this Fairfield Hub is the one in Smart Street, which has driven us for a long time and will drive us for a long time to come as we make it bigger and better and it continues to expand and grow. It’s become, I think, now an essential part of our community and will continue to be and will grow even more.

    So, I want to thank Jason for your leadership and commitment in delivering this $3 million for our community and the money for the other communities as well – $3.5 million, I think – which will see us grow, thrive, and continue to educate and make sure that every Australian child – whether the son of a brain surgeon on Sydney’s North Shore or the daughter of a single parent in Cabramatta or Fairfield – can grow to their full potential for themselves and for their country. And that’s what we’re doing today. So, thank you everyone who works here who has made it a reality. Thank you to everyone who’s going to make it a bigger reality. And thank you to Jason and the university for making this a special day for Fairfield. I’m going to hand over to Senator Sheldon, then I think we’re going to take a few questions.

    TONY SHELDON, SENATOR FOR NSW: Thank you, Chris. And I think that glass of whisky is now two glasses of whisky waiting for him. So, thank you for that announcement for Western Sydney. My previous life to being in the Senate was representing truck drivers and I did that for over 30 years. And most of that work took me throughout Western Sydney, many days and long hours because that’s what truck drivers do. They do 12- and 14-hour days. Many of them own their own trucks. And why are they doing that? Because they want to make sure there’s something for their kids, for their families, and they’re earning an income that will give an opportunity for their families to do good as well and to work hard as they have. But the big disadvantage for anyone in Western Sydney was that there was a lack of university connect. And congratulations to Western Sydney University and to Chris and to Jason.

    And Tu Le, for the years I’ve known Tu Le, is also our candidate for Fowler. Tu has been saying to me as well that we need to make sure that those communities we represent, we work with, have an opportunity for their kids, but also for them, for themselves. Now, for all those truck drivers out there and all those kids of truck drivers, and all those mums and dads out there that have stood by whilst those long hours have been worked, this is what pays off. This is what pays off when community comes together. When governments make decisions and make a real difference for people in a local community. And I can see Barry and [indistinct] and a whole series of people I’ve worked with for many, many years in my previous life, and I work with now, that are so privileged and so happy to see that Western Sydney is again on the map because of the hard work you’ve all been doing to deliver this. And for all those families that now have those opportunities, congratulations. And a significant, a significant opportunity for everybody here in the West. So, thanks, Chris. Thanks, Jason. And thanks to Western Sydney University. Thank you.

    JOURNALIST: I just wanted to start with education, Jason, if that’s alright. When it comes to the final two states, there’s hope that a deal would be reached. Well, I guess that’s hoped to be done imminently. Are you much closer and is there any chance that they’ll be done before the election, whenever that may be?

    CLARE: I’m not going to negotiate through the media. But already we’ve formed agreements, we’ve signed agreements with Western Australia, with South Australia, with Victoria, with the ACT, with Tasmania and the Northern Territory to fix the funding of public schools. And just as importantly, to tie that funding to real and practical reforms to help kids who fall behind at school, to catch up and to keep up and finish school.

    You know, if you don’t know already what drives me – and I think you got an idea of it from my comments a moment ago about helping more young people from communities like ours to get to university – it’s this. The number of kids finishing high school at the moment is going backwards. And it’s not happening everywhere, it’s not happening in private schools, it’s happening in public schools. It’s dropped from 83 per cent to 73 per cent in the last 10 years. And you can draw a connection between that and the billions of dollars that were ripped out of public schools by the last Liberal government.

    I want to fix the funding of our schools and I want to tie it to the sort of reforms that are going to help children who fall behind when they’re little to catch up and to keep up and to finish high school, and so they get a crack at a place like this, they get a chance to go to TAFE or to go to university. That’s what those reforms are about. That’s what the reforms that we passed through the Parliament yesterday are also about. That’s about making sure that disadvantaged kids who are currently missing out on going to child care, to early education and care, don’t miss out.

    At the moment, some of the most disadvantaged kids in this country aren’t just not finishing school, they’re not getting a chance to go to child care. Because of what the Liberal Party put in place when they were in power – something called the Activity Test – it meant that their mum and dads couldn’t get access to government-supported child care for their kids. These are the sort of kids who maybe don’t see a book until they start kindergarten, all because of changes the Liberal Party made.

    Well, we swept that away through the Parliament yesterday. It’s designed to make sure that more kids – as Chris said, whether they come from Mosman or whether they come from Fairfield – get the early education they need to start school ready to learn. The funding agreements that we want to strike with the states are about making sure that the same kids finish school. And hubs like this are about making sure that that same young person gets a chance to go to university closer to where they live.

    JOURNALIST: Can I just clarify, sorry, on that Activity Test, I heard two conflicting things. Is the entire test scrapped, like, across the board, or is it just those kind of three days?

    CLARE: The test as it stands at the moment means that, for some of the most disadvantaged kids in this country, they were only entitled, their parents were only entitled to one day a week of government-supported care. The legislation that passed through the Parliament yesterday strikes that out and provides a three-day guarantee a week for their parents in early education and care. Why three days? Because the Productivity Commission report that we got in the middle of last year, that provides us with a blueprint for how do we build a universal early education and care system for this country, says that’s the amount that kids need. Three days a week, or 30 hours a week, of early education and care. That’s what’s needed to help make sure that all Australia’s children get the early education they need to start school ready to learn, to make sure that they all get off to a great start in life.

    JOURNALIST: And then the final topic for me was just going back to deepfakes at school. So, we’ve seen some examples when it comes to – what’s it called? – in terms of, like, sexualising classmates with deepfakes. I’m just wondering if there’s been any development in that area? I know it’s also a state issue, to an extent, but is there anything you’re working on through that consent course that you’ve set up or in terms of Commonwealth legislation that might further capture this? We kind of have patchy legislation in the Commonwealth level and state levels.

    CLARE: This is terrifying. I can’t think of anything worse for a young student, in particular young Australian women, than if AI was used to do this to you. It’s just simply terrifying. There are three things that we’re doing, Dom. First is the legislation that passed through the Parliament in August last year that criminalises this, that sets serious criminal penalties for this sort of behaviour. Up to seven years in jail.

    The second is the extra funding that we’re providing to the eSafety Commissioner to make sure that she has the resources that she needs to crack down and stamp this out. And then the third is education, what we do in our schools and making sure that we provide the resources to the states and to schools to educate young people, in particular boys and young men, to make it very clear to them what this is and the fact that this is not on.

    We’ve provided about $70-odd million to the states. That consent and respectful relationships education funding is now there and those programs are rolling out in schools right across the country. And one part of that is exactly this.

    JOURNALIST: Thanks for that, mate. That’s all from me.

    CLARE: No worries. I think that might be it. Great. Thanks, guys.

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI USA: February 13th, 2025 N.M. Delegation Demands Trump Stop Unlawful Mass Firings of Probationary Federal Employees

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for New Mexico Martin Heinrich

    Heinrich, Luján, Leger Fernández, Stansbury, Vasquez: “Large-scale firings of probationary employees would ripple through our communities, reducing consumer spending, straining local businesses, and creating unnecessary economic instability”

    “Federal agencies must be staffed by qualified professionals, not political loyalists”

    WASHINGTON — U.S. Senators Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.) and Ben Ray Luján (D-N.M.), and U.S. Representatives Teresa Leger Fernández (D-N.M.), Melanie Stansbury (D-N.M.), and Gabe Vasquez (D-N.M.) are demanding that President Trump immediately halt his unlawful mass firings of federal employees on probationary status.

    Nearly all federal employees are routinely in a probationary period for the first one or two years of service and more than 200,000 of them are on probationary status across the federal government. In New Mexico, there are approximately 2,200 federal employees in their probationary period – including individuals who serve in critical roles across key agencies, including the Veterans Health Administration, the Bureau of Land Management, the U.S. Forest Service, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation, among others. 

    “Abruptly terminating these employees without due process would not only undermine the delivery of essential government services but would also have widespread economic consequences for our state. Federal employment is a major contributor to New Mexico’s economy, supporting thousands of families and generating significant local revenue. Large-scale firings of probationary employees would ripple through our communities, reducing consumer spending, straining local businesses, and creating unnecessary economic instability,” the lawmakers wrote in their letter to President Trump.

    The delegation emphasized how these firings could endanger the safety of New Mexicans, “Recent reports highlight the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s extensive training and reliance on probationary employees, with new agents and support staff actively investigating crimes nationwide. Dismissing these employees could have dire consequences on national security and public safety. Such firings are sure to weaken national security by removing personnel involved in critical investigations. The loss of these agents would leave vital work unfinished and could compromise public safety both in the present and for years to come.”

    Additionally, the delegation highlighted that probationary employees are subject to established federal workforce protections, underscoring the unlawfulness of terminating employees for reasons other than performance or conduct issues, “Concerns have already been raised about the legality of these terminations, noting that mass layoffs without individualized assessments violate existing federal workforce statutes. Federal law permits the termination of probationary employees based on performance or conduct. It does not allow for large-scale firings without individualized assessments or adherence to Reduction in Force procedures. Additionally, it explicitly prohibits dismissing probationary employees for partisan political reasons. Federal agencies must be staffed by qualified professionals, not political loyalists.”

    The lawmakers demanded, “We urge your Administration to halt any plans for mass firings of probationary employees in New Mexico and across the country.”

    The text of the letter is here and below:

    Dear President Trump,

    We write to express serious concerns about your Administration’s efforts to target federal employees, particularly those on probationary status.  Probationary employees are subject to established federal workforce protections, including adherence to Reduction in Force (RIF) procedures (5 C.F.R. § 351.201(a)(1)).  Any attempt to circumvent legal protections by imposing mass terminations would be unprecedented, disruptive, and illegal.

    Nationally, there are more than 2.4 million federal workers. Nearly all federal employees are routinely in a probationary period for the first one or two years of service and more than 200,000 of them are on probationary status across the federal government.  In New Mexico, there are approximately 2,200 federal employees in their probationary period – including individuals who serve in critical roles across key agencies, including the Veterans Health Administration, the Bureau of Land Management, the U.S. Forest Service, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation, among others.

    Abruptly terminating these employees without due process would not only undermine the delivery of essential government services but would also have widespread economic consequences for our state. Federal employment is a major contributor to New Mexico’s economy, supporting thousands of families and generating significant local revenue. Large-scale firings of probationary employees would ripple through our communities, reducing consumer spending, straining local businesses, and creating unnecessary economic instability.

    Immediately terminating probationary employees also risks long-term harm to the federal workforce. Many of these probationary employees represent the next generation of skilled public servants – 27% are under the age of 30 – and they report the highest levels of job engagement across the federal workforce. Signaling that federal employment is unstable and subject to arbitrary dismissal will undermine recruitment and retention efforts, making it harder for agencies to attract and keep the skilled professionals essential to their missions (5 C.F.R. § 351.501).

    Concerns have already been raised about the legality of these terminations, noting that mass layoffs without individualized assessments violate existing federal workforce statutes. Federal law permits the termination of probationary employees based on performance or conduct. It does not allow for large-scale firings without individualized assessments or adherence to Reduction in Force procedures.  Additionally, it explicitly prohibits dismissing probationary employees for partisan political reasons. Federal agencies must be staffed by qualified professionals, not political loyalists.

    Particularly concerning are the potential implications for public safety. Recent reports highlight the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s extensive training and reliance on probationary employees, with new agents and support staff actively investigating crimes nationwide. Dismissing these employees could have dire consequences on national security and public safety. Such firings are sure to weaken national security by removing personnel involved in critical investigations. The loss of these agents would leave vital work unfinished and could compromise public safety both in the present and for years to come.

    Given all of the above, we urge your Administration to halt any plans for mass firings of probationary employees in New Mexico and across the country.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI United Nations: 13 February 2025 Feature story Biosimilars: expanding access to essential biologic therapies

    Source: World Health Organisation

    WHO’s role in promoting biosimilars

    The World Health Organization (WHO) recognizes biosimilars as key drivers for expanding global access to essential biological medicines. Through its Essential Medicines List (EML), WHO evaluates and includes quality-assured biosimilars, endorsing them as safe, effective, and cost-effective alternatives to originator biologics​. The WHO prequalification of biosimilars builds confidence for their procurement by the United Nation (UN) agencies and countries, enhancing their availability and affordability. WHO also advocates for non-exclusive voluntary licensing to accelerate affordable biosimilar access and emphasizes the importance of regulatory harmonization, healthcare professional education, and stakeholder collaboration in promoting biosimilar use​ (3).

    Standards for biological products

    Since early 1950s’ WHO has played a pivotal role in establishing norms and standards for biological products. These standards ensure the consistent quality, safety, and efficacy of biological medicines and related in vitro biological diagnostic tests worldwide. The WHO Expert Committee on Biological Standardization (ECBS) collaborates with international scientific and professional communities, regional and national regulatory authorities, manufacturers, and expert laboratories to develop these standards based on international consensus. WHO guidelines and recommendations for biological products cover various aspects, including production, control, and regulatory preparedness. This guidance is crucial for maintaining high standards in the development and use of biological products, including biosimilars. For instance, the guidelines on the quality, safety, and efficacy of biotherapeutic products provide a framework for evaluating biosimilars at country level, ensuring they meet the same rigorous standards as their reference products. WHO also establishes International Biological Reference Materials, which serve as benchmarks for the quality and potency of biological products (i.e. WHO International Reference Standards for Biological Products). These reference materials are essential for standardizing assays and ensuring the comparability of biosimilar products across different regions and manufacturers. WHO emphasizes the importance of regulatory harmonization to facilitate the global adoption of biosimilars.

    Biosimilars in the EML: bridging the gap

    As of 2023, the WHO EML includes 81 biologic therapies, representing over 15% of all listed essential medicines. The inclusion of biosimilars on the EML helps bridge the gap in affordability and availability of these therapies. For example, following the EML recommendation and WHO prequalification of trastuzumab and rituximab biosimilars treatment costs for breast cancer and lymphoma​ have significantly reduced. Countries such as Brazil (4), India (5), and South Africa (6) have successfully expanded patient access through approved biosimilars, demonstrating the practical benefits of these inclusions.

    Evolution of biologic medicines in the EML

    WHO recognizes the importance of expanding access to essential biologic medicines globally. In 2013, bevacizumab (recommended for age-related macular degeneration, a disease of the eye) was the first monoclonal antibody added to the WHO EML, followed by trastuzumab and rituximab in 2015, both indicated against cancer.  

    Trastuzumab has revolutionized breast cancer treatment for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer. Since its introduction almost 25 years ago, trastuzumab has significantly improved outcomes for patients with this type of cancer. It is a monoclonal antibody that targets the HER2 protein, which is overexpressed in some breast cancers, and it has been pivotal in reducing recurrence and improving survival rates. Trastuzumab’s impact is reflected in the shift from conventional chemotherapy to targeted therapies, offering more effective and less toxic treatment options. However, with an average annual cost exceeding $20,000 USD, many LMICs faced severe budget constraints, leading to limited use of trastuzumab and poor survival rates for patients. In response, WHO prequalified the first trastuzumab biosimilar in 2019. These biosimilars, offering the same efficacy and safety at approximately 65% lower cost, had the potential to transform breast cancer treatment in LMICs.

    Since then, several trastuzumab biosimilars have been approved or are in development by various companies. These biosimilars have been launched in all WHO regions. The inclusion of these biosimilars on the EML facilitated initiatives such as the Cancer Access Partnership, led by the Clinton Health Access Initiative (CHAI) and the American Cancer Society (ACS), which included biological medicines for the first time.

    Today, equitable global access to trastuzumab biosimilars is gradually being realized. Countries like India and Brazil have swiftly integrated these biosimilars into their national healthcare systems. India, for example, has approved multiple trastuzumab biosimilars, significantly reducing treatment costs and broadening patient access nationwide. Similarly, South Africa has adopted trastuzumab biosimilars into its treatment protocols, enhancing accessibility to essential breast cancer medications for patients. Overall, trastuzumab biosimilars have received market authorization and approval in at least 65 countries, signaling a major step forward in global cancer care (7).  

    As of 2019, trastuzumab biosimilars have received market authorization and approval in over 65 countries (8).

    The 2019 inclusion of adalimumab (recommended for rheumatoid arthritis, juvenile idiopathic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis and Crohn’s disease) further underscored WHO’s commitment to improving access and affordability through biosimilars​. Over the next few years, WHO has built on this biosimilar precedent by continuing to add further important biologic medicines to the EML and explicitly listing their quality-assured biosimilars as alternatives.

    Removing barriers to adoption

    While biosimilars have made promising inroads into the Model List, concerns have persisted regarding interchangeability and switching between reference biologics and their biosimilar versions. In 2021, after reviewing substantial evidence confirming the safety and efficacy of transitioning patients from original biologics to biosimilars, the WHO recommended that quality-assured biosimilars of listed biologic medicines should also be viewed as interchangeable and considered for national selection and procurement. This recommendation was pivotal for improving real-world access and use, positioning biosimilars as equal to their reference counterparts and affirming confidence in transitioning patients to save costs without compromising care. The committee reinforced this support by recommending the expansion of WHO prequalification to include biosimilars and advocating for their regular evaluation alongside originators (9).

    WHO recommends that quality-assured biosimilars of EML-listed biologic medicines should be viewed as interchangeable and eligible for selection and procurement at the country level for national essential medicines lists.

    Despite their potential, challenges remain in integrating biosimilars in clinical practice across countries and clinical areas. Issues such as concerns about switching between biosimilars and reference products, regulatory complexities, and educational gaps among healthcare professionals necessitate careful consideration (10).

    Current landscape of essential biologic and biosimilar medicines

    The 2023 Model List includes multiple biologics and their biosimilar alternatives across different therapeutic areas:

    Table 1: Biologic medicines and therapeutic alternatives (including quality-assured biosimilars) on the WHO Model Lists.

    Medicine Indication(s)
    Adalimumab
     
    (therapeutic alternatives: certolizumab pegol, etanercept, golimumab, infliximab)
    Ankylosing spondylitis, Crohn disease, juvenile idiopathic arthritis and rheumatoid arthritis
    Anti-rabies virus monoclonal antibodies
     
    Rabies post-exposure prophylaxis
    Asparaginase
     
    Acute lymphoblastic leukemia
    Bevacizumab
     
    Age-related macular degeneration
    Enoxaparin
     
    (therapeutic alternatives: dalteparin, nadroparin)
     
    Acute coronary syndromes
    Venous thromboembolism
    Erythorpoiesis-stimulating agents

    (therapeutic alternatives: epoetin alfa, beta, and theta, darbepoetin alfa, methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta)
     

    Anaemia of chronic renal disease
    Filgrastim Primary and secondary prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia associated with myelotoxic chemotherapy.
     
    Insulin (human)
    (soluble and intermediate-acting)
     
    Diabetes
    Long-acting Insulin analogues
     
    (therapeutic alternatives: insulin degludec, insulin detemir, insulin glargine)
     
    Diabetes
    Nivolumab
     
    (therapeutic alternative: pembrolizumab)
     
    Metastatic melanoma
    Pegaspargase
     
    Acute lymphoblastic leukemia
    Pegfilgrastim
     
    Primary and secondary prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia associated with myelotoxic chemotherapy.
     
    Rituximab
     
    Burkitt lymphoma, chronic lymphocytic leukaemia, diffuse large B-cell lymphomas, follicular lymphoma, multiple sclerosis
    Trastuzumab
     
    HER2-positive breast cancer

    Economic benefits and WHO recommendations for biosimilar medicines

    The WHO guideline on country pharmaceutical pricing policies includes a strong recommendation for promoting the use of quality-assured generic and biosimilar medicines.

    WHO recommends that countries enable early market entry of generic and biosimilar medicines through legislative and administrative measures, with a view to encouraging early submission of regulatory applications, allowing for prompt and effective review, and ensuring these products are safe, efficacious, and quality-assured (9)

    The WHO guideline also emphasizes the importance of cost-effective procurement strategies to enhance accessibility and sustainability of healthcare systems, particularly in LMICs.

    Challenges and future directions

    Despite the demonstrated benefits, several challenges remain in the broader adoption of biosimilars. Regulatory barriers, lack of awareness among healthcare professionals, and limited manufacturing capabilities in certain regions can hinder the widespread acceptance and utilization of biosimilars​. Addressing these challenges requires coordinated efforts among governments, healthcare providers, and the pharmaceutical industry to promote education, streamline regulatory processes, and invest in local manufacturing infrastructure.

    WHO continues to play a pivotal role in promoting the adoption of biosimilars through its strategic initiatives. WHO emphasizes the importance of regulatory harmonization and supports countries in building robust regulatory frameworks to ensure the quality, safety, and efficacy of biosimilars. Additionally, WHO collaborates with various stakeholders to enhance healthcare professional education and public awareness about the benefits of biosimilars, fostering a more receptive environment for their adoption​.

    References

    1. Agency EM. European Medicines Agency [Internet]. [cited 2024]. Available from: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/human-regulatory-overview/biosimilar-medicines-overview.
    2. Calleja MA, Albanell J, Aranda E, García-Foncillas J, Feliu A, Rivera F, et al. Budget impact analysis of bevacizumab biosimilars for cancer treatment in adult patients in Spain. European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy. 2023;30(e1):e40.
    3. Burrone E, Gotham D, Gray A, de Joncheere K, Magrini N, Martei YM, et al. Patent pooling to increase access to essential medicines. Bull World Health Organ. 2019;97(8):575-7.
    4. Celltrion. Biosimilar Development [Internet]2019. [cited 2024]. Available from: https://www.biosimilardevelopment.com/doc/celltrion-announces-approval-of-herzuma-trastuzumab-pkrb-in-brazil-0001.
    5. Lopes G. American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Connection [Internet]2016. [cited 2024]. Available from: https://connection.asco.org/blogs/biosimilars-emerging-markets-india-and-russia.
    6. Pategou J. Biosimilar Development [Internet]2020. [cited 2024]. Available from: https://www.biosimilardevelopment.com/doc/africa-s-biosimilar-landscape-outlook-current-challenges-0001.
    7. CHAI and ACS announce agreement to expand Cancer Access Partnership  [press release]. 2021.
    8. Biocon. Biocon [Internet]2019. [cited 2024]. Available from: https://www.biocon.com/mylan-and-biocon-launch-first-trastuzumab-biosimilar-ogivri-in-australia/.
    9. World Health Organization. WHO guideline on country pharmaceutical pricing policies. World Health Organization; 2020. Available from: https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/335692 

    “,”datePublished”:”2025-02-13T13:00:00.0000000+00:00″,”image”:”https://www.who.int/images/default-source/wpro/vaccines.jpg?sfvrsn=89a81d7f_14″,”publisher”:{“@type”:”Organization”,”name”:”World Health Organization: WHO”,”logo”:{“@type”:”ImageObject”,”url”:”https://www.who.int/Images/SchemaOrg/schemaOrgLogo.jpg”,”width”:250,”height”:60}},”dateModified”:”2025-02-13T13:00:00.0000000+00:00″,”mainEntityOfPage”:”https://www.who.int/news/item/13-02-2025-biosimilars–expanding-access-to-essential-biologic-therapies”,”@context”:”http://schema.org”,”@type”:”NewsArticle”};
    ]]>

    MIL OSI United Nations News

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Second Reading Speech – Early Childhood Education And Care (Three Day Guarantee) Bill 2025

    Source: Australian Executive Government Ministers

    Ask any parent, and they’ll tell you early education and care is an essential service. It helps them get back to work and helps their children get ready for school. Under
    the Liberals the cost went through the roof and the rules were tightened to make it harder for some children to get the start in life they deserve. We’re fixing that.

    Over 10 years the cost of child care exploded by more than 49 per cent—double the OECD average—under Abbott, Turnbull and Morrison. We said we’d cut the cost of child care and we have, for more than one million families right across the country. As a result of the changes we made and passed through this Parliament two years ago, a family on a joint income of about $120,000 has saved $2,768 since July 2023. That’s helped a lot of parents get back to work and put more money in their pockets, and it’s meant more children are now getting the benefits of our early education system. The number of children in our early education system is now about 100,000 more than it was when we were elected 2½ years ago. That’s a good thing. There are also 1,000 more centres and more services. That’s good, too.

    When we came to office 2½ years ago, something else was happening. The people who educate and care for our children were leaving the sector in droves. They were leaving the job that they loved. The attrition rate was through the roof. That’s now changed, too. The reason for that is the 15 per cent pay rise that we’re now rolling out. The best example of that is what’s happening at Goodstart Early Learning, the biggest childcare operator in the country. At their centres, across the country, job applications have now jumped by 35 per cent. Expressions of interest have jumped by 50 to 60 per cent, and vacancy rates are down by a massive 28 per cent. We’re seeing that right across the country. Vacancy rates right across the sector are now down by 22 per cent. It turns out that, if you pay people more, more want to do the job. Early educators are some of the most important workers in this country and some of the most underpaid. They were leaving the job that they love, the job that we need them to, not because they didn’t want to do it but because they couldn’t afford to keep doing it. That 15 per cent pay increase is fixing that.

    The next step in making our early education system better and fairer is making sure that more children who currently can’t get access to it get that chance. In February 2023, we asked the Productivity Commission to comprehensively review our early education system. We asked them to help build a blueprint for reform and tell us how we can build a truly universal early education system. We got their final report in June of last year. One of the things it says that we have to do if we want to build that universal early education system is build more centres where they don’t exist, what are sometimes referred to as ‘childcare deserts’. We’re doing that. In December, the Prime Minister announced that, if we win the next election, the government will create a $1 billion Building Early Education Fund. This will be the single biggest ever investment by an Australian government in new childcare services. It will build or expand over 160 early education and care centres where they’re needed most. I want to thank GrainGrowers, who said that this is positive step and that this fund will help expand and build new childhood education and care centres in areas of need. I want to thank the National Farmers Federation too for imploring the Liberals and the Nationals to match what we’re doing. They get it. Unfortunately, the Liberal Party and National Party haven’t heard them, because they don’t support this. They’ve spent 2½ years in this Parliament talking about childcare deserts. They spent a decade in government doing nothing about it. Now there is a $1 billion fund on the table that they could support, but they choose not to. It’s unbelievable. The Productivity Commission also recommended something else that we need to do next. That’s to get rid of the Liberals’ activity test. This is a real barrier that was purposefully put in place by the Liberal Party to limit access to early education for a lot of children—in particular, a lot of disadvantaged children and kids from poor families. It is deeply unfair. A test to determine if your child is worthy of accessing early education is one that no family should have to pass. The Productivity Commission report gives us a definition of what a universal early education and care system could and should look like. It says it’s a system where every child can get access to affordable early education and care three days a week or 30 hours a week. This bill gets rid of the Liberals’ activity test and replaces it with a guarantee of access to three days a week of government supported early education and care for every child who needs it. It’s still means tested, but it means that families will not be left out because parents are looking for work or preparing to go back to study. It means that over 100,000 families will be able to get more subsidised hours of early education and care. And it means real cost-of-living relief for 66,700 families in the first full financial your alone. Those families will save an average of $1,370 per year on their childcare costs. About half of those families earn less than $100,000 per year. Lower-income families will save even more: an average of $1,460 a year.

    This is going to make a real difference for a lot of young families. It will help with the cost of living but it will do more than that. Fundamentally this is about helping every child get a great start in life—what every parent wants for their children and what every child deserves—helping them to get ready to start school, helping to make sure they don’t start school behind. That’s what early education does. This is not babysitting; it’s early education. The evidence is clear: children who get access to early education and care are more likely to start school ready to go, ready to learn. They’re also more likely to finish school and then go on to more study. Former US President Joe Biden often made the point that a child who goes to preschool is 50 per cent more likely to go to college. At the moment, while lots of Australian children get the benefit of this life-changing opportunity, not all do. As the Productivity Commission pointed out in its final report, at the moment it’s children who need it most who are least likely to access early education and care. In 2021 only 54 per cent of children in the most disadvantaged areas were enrolled in early education and care, compared with 76 per cent of children in the highest socioeconomic areas. The most recent Early Development Census report found that only 42.7 per cent of children experiencing the highest level of socioeconomic disadvantage were on track when they started school, compared with 54.8 per cent of all children. That’s what this is about: helping them, helping to make sure more children are ready to start school.

    This bill does something else, too. As part of our commitment to closing the gap we are setting a target of ensuring that at least 55 per cent of Indigenous Australian children are developmentally on track. At the moment it’s 34 per cent. That’s a big gap. Not unsurprisingly, Indigenous children’s attendance at early education and care is way below the national average, and the activity test is one of the reasons for this. That’s why this bill increases the base entitlement to 100 hours for Indigenous children. It’s a really important change—one that Indigenous families and communities have been calling for since the activity test was created. And we have listened. You only have to listen to the words of the CEO of SNAICC, Catherine Liddle, after the Prime Minister announced this policy to know how important this is. This is what Catherine said:
    This can be a game-changer for our babies. It will mean more children are developmentally ready for school, setting them up for a thriving future.

    It’s just one part of the work we need do to close the gap, and I am so very proud that it’s part of this bill. I want to thank the Prime Minister for his leadership in driving reform in this area, and I know how personally important it is to him to see these changes being made. I also want to thank my dear friend and colleague the Minister for Early Childhood Education, the awesome Anne Aly. I also want to thank our offices, and I want to thank our department for the work they have done in preparing this legislation. And I want to thank our early educators and our teachers, and I hope you see in this bill how this government values the important work you do. I also want to thank everyone who has called for this for years and years and years—groups like the Parenthood, whose CEO, Georgie Dent, called this ‘a paradigm shift’; people like Ros Baxter, the CEO of Goodstart, who said, ‘This will change lives;’ or Jay Weatherill at the Minderoo Foundation who called this ‘a momentous step’; or the Centre for Policy Development, who said that this guarantee ‘is a game-changer’ and that it demonstrates ‘a real dedication to delivering a universal system’; or the Business Council of Australia’s Wendy Black, who said that they have ‘long called for an early childhood education guarantee based on quality, universal access to give children a strong educational foundation’.

    This is important reform for an essential service for more than a million families across the country. It helps parents get back to work, but, even more important than that, it helps the next generation of Australians to prepare for school, to prepare for their life ahead. That’s what makes this reform so important, and I am so happy to commend it to the House.

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI: Pulse Seismic Inc. Reports 2024 Financial Results and Declares Regular and Special Dividends

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    CALGARY, Alberta, Feb. 13, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Pulse Seismic Inc. (TSX:PSD) (OTCQX:PLSDF) (“Pulse” or the “Company”) is pleased to report its financial and operating results for the year ended December 31, 2024. The audited consolidated financial statements, accompanying notes and MD&A are being filed on SEDAR+ (www.sedarplus.ca) and will be available on Pulse’s website at www.pulseseismic.com.

    Pulse’s Board of Directors today approved a quarterly dividend of $0.015 per share and additionally declared a special dividend of $0.20 per share. The total of the dividends will be approximately $10.9 million based on Pulse’s 50,837,863 common shares outstanding as of February 13, 2025, to be paid on March 13, 2025, to shareholders of record on February 28, 2025. This dividend is designated as an eligible dividend for Canadian income tax purposes. For non-resident shareholders, Pulse’s dividends are subject to Canadian withholding tax.

    “We are very pleased with the Company’s 2024 financial performance, and what we have accomplished so far in 2025. We remain focused on returning capital to shareholders, as deemed appropriate given the annual fluctuations inherent in our business. So far in 2025 we have secured $17.5 million in sales and today the Board of Directors declared a special dividend of $0.20 per share, in addition to the regular quarterly dividend,” stated Neal Coleman, Pulse’s President and CEO. “In 2024, 76% of free cashflow was allocated to dividends and share buybacks, and looking back to Q4 2021, after repayment of the majority of the 2019 acquisition debt, we resumed dividends and share buybacks and have declared $0.83 per share in dividends and decreased our share count by three million,” Coleman concluded.

    HIGHLIGHTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2024

    • The return of capital to shareholders in 2024 including all dividends declared in the year and shares purchased under the Normal Course Issuer Bid (NCIB), totalled $9.5 million, and was 76% of shareholder free cashflow generated for the year;
    • Dividends of $0.10875 per share were declared in 2024. Regular dividends declared and paid totalled $0.05875 per share. The annualized regular dividend of $0.055 per share was increased by 9% to $0.06 per share in the second quarter of the year. A special dividend of $0.05 per share was paid in the third quarter of 2024;
    • 1,784,000 shares were purchased during the year under the Normal Course Issuer Bid (NCIB) at an average price of $2.17 per share, for total cost of approximately $3.9 million;
    • Shareholder free cash flow(a) was $12.4 million ($0.24 per share basic and diluted) compared to $24.8 million ($0.47 per share basic and diluted) for the year ended December 31, 2023;
    • EBITDA(a) was $15.5 million ($0.30 per share basic and diluted) compared to $30.4 million ($0.57 per share basic and diluted) for the year ended December 31, 2023;
    • Net earnings were $3.4 million ($0.07 per share basic and diluted) compared to net earnings of $15.0 million ($0.28 per share basic and diluted) for 2023;
    • Total revenue was $23.4 million compared to $39.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2023; and
    • At December 31, 2024, the Company had a cash balance of $8.7 million as well as $5.0 million of available liquidity on its credit facility.

    HIGHLIGHTS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2024

    • The regular quarterly dividend of $0.015 per share was paid in the fourth quarter;
    • A total of 97,700 shares were purchased under the NCIB in the fourth quarter, at an average price of $2.32 per share and total cost of approximately $226,000;
    • Shareholder free cash flow was $2.4 million ($0.05 per share basic and diluted) compared to $10.9 million ($0.21 per share basic and diluted) in the fourth quarter of 2023;
    • EBITDA was $3.8 million ($0.07 per share basic and diluted) compared to $13.6 million ($0.26 per share basic and diluted) in the fourth quarter of 2023;
    • Net earnings were $774,000 ($0.02 per share basic and diluted) compared to net earnings of $8.3 million ($0.16 per share basic and diluted) in the fourth quarter of 2023; and
    • Total revenue was $5.6 million compared to $16.9 million for the three months ended December 31, 2023.
    SELECTED FINANCIAL AND
    OPERATING INFORMATION
           
             
             
    (Thousands of dollars except per share data, Three months ended December 31, Years ended December 31,
    numbers of shares and kilometres of seismic data) 2024 2023 2024 2023
         
    Revenue 5,576 16,861 23,379 39,127
             
    Amortization of seismic data library 2,263 2,270 9,090 9,103
    Net earnings 774 8,307 3,391 15,007
    Per share basic and diluted 0.02 0.16 0.07 0.28
    Cash provided by operating activities 2,337 7,001 14,195 23,524
    Per share basic and diluted 0.05 0.13 0.28 0.44
    EBITDA (a) 3,785 13,592 15,496 30,431
    Per share basic and diluted (a) 0.07 0.26 0.30 0.57
    Shareholder free cash flow (a) 2,440 10,946 12,408 24,829
    Per share basic and diluted (a) 0.05 0.21 0.24 0.47
             
    Capital expenditures        
    Seismic data 225
    Property and equipment 45 28
    Total capital expenditures 270 28
             
    Dividends        
    Regular dividends declared 763 724 3,018 2,862
    Special dividends declared 10,527 2,548 18,519
    Total dividends declared 763 11,251 5,566 21,381
             
    Normal course issuer bid        
    Number of shares purchased and cancelled 97,700 59,500 1,784,000 1,005,006
    Cost of shares purchased and cancelled 227 112 3,880 1,943
             
    Weighted average shares outstanding        
    Basic and diluted 50,878,652 52,647,740 51,448,985 53,237,569
    Shares outstanding at period-end     50,837,863 52,621,863
             
    Seismic library        
    2D in kilometres     829,207 829,207
    3D in square kilometres     65,310 65,310
           
    FINANCIAL POSITION        
          December 31, December 31,
    (Thousands of dollars except working capital ratio)     2024 2023
    Working capital     9,222 7,468
    Working capital ratio     5.1:1 1.5:1
    Cash and cash equivalents     8,722 15,948
    Total assets     21,516 41,249
    EBITDA     15,496 30,431
    Shareholders’ equity     18,295 25,655
             
     

    (a) The Company’s continuous disclosure documents provide discussion and analysis of “EBITDA”, “EBITDA per share”, “shareholder free cash flow” and “shareholder free cash flow per share”. These financial measures do not have standard definitions prescribed by IFRS and, therefore, may not be comparable to similar measures disclosed by other companies. The Company has included these non-GAAP financial measures because management, investors, analysts and others use them as measures of the Company’s financial performance. The Company’s definition of EBITDA is cash available for interest payments, cash taxes, repayment of debt, purchase of its shares, discretionary capital expenditures and the payment of dividends, and is calculated as earnings (loss) from operations before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. The Company believes EBITDA assists investors in comparing Pulse’s results on a consistent basis without regard to non-cash items, such as depreciation and amortization, which can vary significantly depending on accounting methods or non-operating factors such as historical cost. EBITDA per share is defined as EBITDA divided by the weighted average number of shares outstanding for the period. Shareholder free cash flow further refines the calculation of capital available to invest in growing the Company’s 2D and 3D seismic data library, to repay debt, to purchase its common shares and to pay dividends by deducting non-discretionary expenditures from EBITDA. Non-discretionary expenditures are defined as non-cash expenses, debt financing costs (net of deferred financing expenses amortized in the current period), net restructuring costs and current tax provisions. Shareholder free cash flow per share is defined as shareholder free cash flow divided by the weighted average number of shares outstanding for the period.
    These non-GAAP financial measures are defined, calculated and reconciled to the nearest GAAP financial measures in the Management’s Discussion and Analysis.

    OUTLOOK

    Pulse’s ability to predict future revenue generation has always been challenging due to the nature of the business, which naturally fluctuates from year to year. That said, Pulse has had a strong start to the year having closed $17.5 million in sales, representing approximately 75% of sales in 2024. There are generally a mix of positive and negative factors influencing the industry which contributes to the challenge, and at this time in particular, uncertainty concerning 2025 is high. Positive factors in 2024, and recent projections into 2025 include high levels of M & A activity, approximately $19.4 billion in 2024 compared to $16.5 billion in 2023, while the latest annual forecast by Sayer Energy Advisors for 2025 is approximately $15.0 billion. There were continuing high volumes of land sales in Alberta in 2024: approximately $365 million, down only slightly from the $370 million in 2023, and significantly higher than in recent years going back to before the 2014-2015 industry downturn. In British Columbia, land sales which had been paused since May 2021 finally resumed in December 2024. New infrastructure, such as the TMX pipeline expansion which was completed in 2024 has already provided increased export capacity and is a driver of increased drilling activity. The Canadian Association of Energy Contractors, in November 2024 forecast an increase to 6,604 wells to be drilled in 2025, an approximate 7% increase over 2024. The pending completion of LNG Canada’s liquified natural gas export facility is expected to contribute to the forecast increase in drilling and may lead to an improvement in Canadian natural gas prices. The positive factors are offset by factors that create uncertainty for the future, including economic, political, and environmental concerns. It is clear that Canada needs to continue to build pipelines and increase natural gas egress, to support the country’s energy security, as well as to secure new buyers of Canadian energy. The impacts of the recent change in administration in the United States and the uncertainty around energy tariffs and trade policy, together with Canadian federal government leadership changes are contributing to the lack of clarity for the future.

    Pulse, as previously stated, has low visibility regarding future seismic data library sales levels, regardless of industry conditions. The Company remains focused on business practices that have served throughout the full range of conditions. The Company maintains a strong balance sheet, has zero debt, no capital spending commitments, and a disciplined and rigorous approach to evaluating growth opportunities. This 15-person company, led by an experienced and capable management team, operates with a low-cost structure and focuses on developing excellent client relations as well providing exceptional customer service. Pulse’s strong financial position, high leverage to increased revenue in its EBITDA margin and careful management of its cash resources have resulted in the return of capital to shareholders through regular and special dividends and the repurchase of its shares.

    CORPORATE PROFILE

    Pulse is a market leader in the acquisition, marketing and licensing of 2D and 3D seismic data to the western Canadian energy sector. Pulse owns the largest licensable seismic data library in Canada, currently consisting of approximately 65,310 square kilometres of 3D seismic and 829,207 kilometres of 2D seismic. The library extensively covers the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin, where most of Canada’s oil and natural gas exploration and development occur.

    For further information, please contact:
    Neal Coleman, President and CEO
    Or
    Pamela Wicks, Vice President Finance and CFO
    Tel.: 403-237-5559
    Toll-free: 1-877-460-5559
    E-mail: info@pulseseismic.com.
    Please visit our website at www.pulseseismic.com

    This document contains information that constitutes “forward-looking information” or “forward-looking statements” (collectively, “forward-looking information”) within the meaning of applicable securities legislation. Forward-looking information is often, but not always, identified by the use of words such as “anticipate”, “believe”, “expect”, “plan”, “intend”, “forecast”, “target”, “project”, “guidance”, “may”, “will”, “should”, “could”, “estimate”, “predict” or similar words suggesting future outcomes or language suggesting an outlook.

    The Outlook section herein contain forward-looking information which includes, but is not limited to, statements regarding:

    >   The outlook of the Company for the year ahead, including future operating costs and expected revenues;
    >   Recent events on the political, economic, regulatory, and legal fronts affecting the industry’s medium- to longer-term prospects, including progression and completion of contemplated pipeline projects;
    >   The Company’s capital resources and sufficiency thereof to finance future operations, meet its obligations associated with financial liabilities and carry out the necessary capital expenditures through 2025;
    >   Pulse’s capital allocation strategy;
    >   Pulse’s dividend policy;
    >   Oil and natural gas prices and forecast trends;
    >   Oil and natural gas drilling activity and land sales activity;
    >   Oil and natural gas company capital budgets;
    >   Future demand for seismic data;
    >   Future seismic data sales;
    >   Pulse’s business and growth strategy; and
    >   Other expectations, beliefs, plans, goals, objectives, assumptions, information and statements about possible future events, conditions, results and performance, as they relate to the Company or to the oil and natural gas industry as a whole.
         

    By its very nature, forward-looking information involves inherent risks and uncertainties, both general and specific, and risks that predictions, forecasts, projections and other forward-looking statements will not be achieved. Pulse does not publish specific financial goals or otherwise provide guidance, due to the inherently poor visibility of seismic revenue. The Company cautions readers not to place undue reliance on these statements as a number of important factors could cause the actual results to differ materially from the beliefs, plans, objectives, expectations and anticipations, estimates and intentions expressed in such forward-looking information.

    These factors include, but are not limited to:

    >   Uncertainty of the timing and volume of data sales;
    >   Volatility of oil and natural gas prices;
    >   Risks associated with the oil and natural gas industry in general;
    >   The Company’s ability to access external sources of debt and equity capital;
    >   Credit, liquidity and commodity price risks;
    >   The demand for seismic data and;
    >   The pricing of data library licence sales;
    >   Cybersecurity;
    >   Relicensing (change-of-control) fees and partner copy sales;
    >   Environmental, health and safety risks;
    >   Federal and provincial government laws and regulations, including those pertaining to taxation, royalty rates, environmental protection, public health and safety;
    >   Competition;
    >   Dependence on key management, operations and marketing personnel;
    >   The loss of seismic data;
    >   Protection of intellectual property rights;
    >   The introduction of new products; and
    >   Climate change.
         

    Pulse cautions that the foregoing list of factors that may affect future results is not exhaustive. Additional information on these risks and other factors which could affect the Company’s operations and financial results is included under “Risk Factors” in the Company’s most recent annual information form, and in the Company’s most recent audited annual financial statements, most recent MD&A, management information circular, quarterly reports, material change reports and news releases. Copies of the Company’s public filings are available on SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.ca.

    When relying on forward-looking information to make decisions with respect to Pulse, investors and others should carefully consider the foregoing factors and other uncertainties and potential events. Furthermore, the forward-looking information contained in this document is provided as of the date of this document and the Company does not undertake any obligation to update publicly or to revise any of the included forward-looking information, except as required by law. The forward-looking information in this document is provided for the limited purpose of enabling current and potential investors to evaluate an investment in Pulse. Readers are cautioned that such forward-looking information may not be appropriate, and should not be used, for other purposes.

    PDF available: http://ml.globenewswire.com/Resource/Download/f55ea14e-e8ea-4d49-975a-eedb00bb9aa3

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-Evening Report: In Robert F. Kennedy Jr, the US has put a conspiracy theorist in charge of public health

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Hassan Vally, Associate Professor, Epidemiology, Deakin University

    Overnight, Robert F. Kennedy Jr was confirmed as the secretary of the US Health and Human Services Department. Put simply, this makes him the most influential figure in overseeing the health and wellbeing of more than 330 million Americans.

    As health secretary, Kennedy will be involved in overseeing federal health agencies that regulate medical research, disease prevention, drug approvals and health-care programs.

    This includes oversight of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the Food and Drug Administration and the National Institutes of Health, which are among the most crucial public health agencies in the country.

    Reports suggest he’ll oversee a budget in the order of US$1.8 trillion (A$2.8 trillion) annually.

    In the era of Trump 2.0, there’s little that shocks me anymore. But Kennedy would have to be the most unqualified person ever to hold this crucial role of protecting the health of the American people.

    A history of discounting science

    The absolute minimum requirement for someone occupying such as role should be an understanding of science and respect for scientific evidence and expertise. Yet, Kennedy fails spectacularly in this regard.

    Here are just some of the false claims he has made over the years:

    None of these positions has even the smallest amount of scientific support.

    It’s hard to predict what Kennedy will do as health secretary, especially given his confirmation hearings looked to be an exercise in being vague, evasive and denying or downplaying his prior controversial statements to secure support.

    But there are three areas where his views are fairly clear and his appointment could be expected to have a significant impact. These are water fluoridation, infectious diseases research and vaccines.

    Fluoridation of water

    Kennedy has been a long-term opponent of water fluoridation, despite its proven benefits in preventing tooth decay. He has consistently questioned its safety and claimed it’s linked to a range of illnesses such as arthritis, bone cancer, IQ loss and neurodevelopmental disorders.

    While a recent review suggested a link between water fluoridation and lower IQ in children, the levels of fluoride in the water in countries included in this review were generally several times higher than the levels in public water fluoridation programs in countries such as the US and Australia. There were also other limitations that make interpreting these findings challenging.

    The CDC has identified community water fluoridation as as one of the ten great public health achievements of the 20th century. And it continues to benefit dental health today, without any convincing evidence of possible harms.

    Nonetheless, it seems likely that in keeping with his longstanding views one of Kennedy’s first priorities will be to try to halt water fluoridation in the US.

    Infectious diseases

    Alongside his confirmation as health secretary, US President Donald Trump signed an executive order establishing “The President’s Commission to Make America Healthy Again”, with Kennedy as the chair.

    The Make America Healthy Again movement (MAHA) is an initiative driven by Kennedy focusing on improving nutrition, increasing transparency in medical practices and reducing the corporate influence in health.

    Though premised primarily on combating chronic diseases, the movement also embraces scepticism of established medical practices, unproven alternative therapies and a general mistrust of institutions.

    What’s more, Kennedy’s focus on chronic diseases seems to be coming at the expense of continued work on infectious diseases.

    He has proposed directing the National Institutes of Health to pause infectious disease research for eight years to prioritise research into chronic diseases and alternative treatments.

    As health secretary, Kennedy has the power to shift research priorities. If he were to effectively halt infectious diseases research – in the wake of COVID and with a looming threat of future pandemics – this would be catastrophic for the US and global health.

    Vaccine scepticism

    Related to infectious diseases, there’s little doubt the area in which Kennedy has done the most damage relates to vaccines.

    He has dedicated a large part of his life to undermining public confidence in vaccines. This is despite overwhelming scientific evidence demonstrating their safety and effectiveness, and the millions of lives they’ve saved.

    Although he has subsequently denied it, Kennedy is on record as falsely stating there is no such thing as a safe and effective vaccine. Notably, he has continued to push the debunked claim that the measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine is linked to autism, despite the single study finding this having been widely discredited.

    Kennedy’s frequent assertion that he’s not anti-vaccine, but “pro-safety”, is also deeply disingenuous. Being “pro-safety” is a deliberately vague notion designed to appear reasonable while at the same time undermining the scientific evidence.

    The impact of Kennedy’s appointment as health secretary on vaccine confidence will not just be limited to the US. Vaccine hesitancy has been recognised as one of the greatest threats to public health. Having a vaccine sceptic leading the US health agencies has the potential to harm vaccine uptake worldwide.

    As we’ve seen during the COVID pandemic, producing a vaccine is only half the battle. Convincing people to take it is just as important. There’s no doubt Kennedy’s influence on public health messaging could further erode vaccine confidence at a time when vaccine messaging must be clear.

    It’s bad news for the US and the world

    One of the reasons Kennedy poses such a threat to public health in the US and globally is his lack of trust in science. He believes a narrative can be crafted by picking and choosing any study that fits with his world view, regardless of its quality.

    In addition, he personifies the bad-faith tactics of conspiracy theorists globally, “selling” the flawed premise that any assertion is valid until others prove it false.

    What the world needs now is a safe pair of hands leading public health in the US. Someone who is guided by evidence – not someone who promotes anti-science propaganda and conspiracy theories.

    Hassan Vally does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. In Robert F. Kennedy Jr, the US has put a conspiracy theorist in charge of public health – https://theconversation.com/in-robert-f-kennedy-jr-the-us-has-put-a-conspiracy-theorist-in-charge-of-public-health-249601

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-OSI China: China’s unreliable entity list only targets very small number of rule-breaking firms

    Source: China State Council Information Office 3

    China’s Ministry of Commerce said Thursday that the unreliable entity list targets only a very small number of foreign entities that undermine market rules and violate Chinese laws.

    Two U.S. firms, namely PVH Corp. and Illumina, Inc., were added to China’s unreliable entity list on Feb. 4. The move could subject the companies to one or multiple measures under Article 10 of the country’s provisions on the unreliable entity list, ministry spokesperson He Yongqian said at a regular news conference.

    China has always exercised prudence in addressing issues related to the unreliable entity list, He said, noting that honest and law-abiding foreign entities have nothing to worry about.

    The Chinese government continues to welcome companies from around the world to invest and operate in China, and remains committed to providing a stable, fair and predictable business environment for law-abiding foreign enterprises operating in the country, said the spokesperson.

    MIL OSI China News

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Auckland Council advances flood resilience project in Rānui

    Source: Auckland Council

    Auckland Council is taking further action to protect homes from flooding with the Transport, Resilience and Infrastructure Committee endorsing a major flood resilience project for Clover Drive in Rānui.

    This follows the green light given to critical projects in Māngere earlier in 2024.

    “I’m pleased that we’ll be able to get on with the flood resilience work in Rānui. This community was among the worst affected during the 2023 Anniversary Weekend floods so it’s critical we progress the work to mitigate against future risk and protect residents living in these areas,” says Mayor Wayne Brown.

    At its recent meeting, the Transport, Resilience and Infrastructure Committee approved the business case for Clover Drive flood resilience works which now releases funding for the design and consenting processes.

    “Receiving the endorsement to progress with this next project is a much-welcomed step forward,” says Councillor Andy Baker, Chair of the Transport, Resilience and Infrastructure Committee.

    “Reducing the risks to our flood-prone communities is a clear priority for this council. Improving the capacity to manage stormwater in these areas will significantly reduce flood risk for hundreds of homes as well as create an opportunity to make transformational improvements to the wider community.”

    Improving flood resilience in Rānui

    Many streets, including Clover Drive and more, in the Rānui area experienced severe flooding during the 2023 Auckland Anniversary Weekend floods. The area was inundated with floodwaters, reaching depths of close to two metres in some houses with emergency services conducting numerous rescues of marooned residents.

    Waitākere Ward Councillor Shane Henderson acknowledges the impacts of flooding on this community and the importance of this work.

    “Our communities in Rānui have been feeling the severe impacts of flooding long before the Auckland Anniversary floods and were one of the worst hit areas at the time. It’s important that we, as a council, support our hardest hit communities and it’s great to see the work in Clover Drive prioritised so it can progress swiftly,” says Cr Henderson.

    Waitākere Ward Councillor Ken Turner celebrates this milestone and acknowledges that there’s more work to be done.

    “It’s good to see this work reach a key milestone for our West Auckland communities. It’s important for us to ensure our focus remains on maintaining these improvements into the future so we can safeguard against increased capacity.”

    The planned improvements in Rānui will be done in collaboration with local iwi and the community to maximise benefits for the wider area. Works may involve widening of streams and installing debris racks to enhance water flow and reduce the risk of blockages. Upgrades to bridges to increase stormwater flow will also be planned with community input.

    These physical changes will be complemented by efforts to enhance the local environment, creating open spaces, connecting parkland and pathways, and widening streams to redirect water away from homes during heavy rain events. This work stands to bring many benefits to the community, including better water quality, more open space, improved biodiversity, and better connectivity.

    This initiative is part of the Making Space for Water programme co-funded by local and central government to share the cost of storm recovery and resilience work in the Auckland region.

    Early concept designs are currently being scoped and once completed will be presented to cabinet for final funding approval by March 2025. Once funding is approved, community engagement will continue, before moving into detailed design stages, with construction expected to commence in late 2026/early 2027.

    Planning and prioritisation for future projects

    Many communities were heavily impacted by the severe weather events of early 2023 including the Wairau Valley area which experienced widespread damage, especially in the residential areas of Tōtara Vale, Nile Road and commercial areas around Wairau Road, tragically resulting in two fatalities.

    The council is working closely with the Wairau community to gather feedback and input on early concept designs before a business case is submitted in the coming months.

    Further areas across Tāmaki Makaurau continue to be assessed and prioritised for future blue-green works.

    You can find out more information about these projects on the council’s website or you can reach out to the team at bluegreen@aucklandcouncil.govt.nz

    About Making Space for Water

    The Making Space for Water programme includes a range of initiatives to reduce flood risk to Aucklanders. Part of this is building new flood resilient infrastructure to enhance stormwater assets and green spaces to deliver increased flood management.

    Auckland Council is sharing some of the cost of flood resilience projects with central government as part of a $2 billion co-funding agreement for storm recovery. These are subject to business case approvals from both the council and the government, and projects must demonstrate a flood risk reduction for the wider community, not just individual properties.

    MIL OSI New Zealand News

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Release: Disabled people languishing in psych wards due to Govt cuts

    Source: New Zealand Labour Party

    National’s cuts to disability support funding and freezing of new residential placements has resulted in significant mental health decline for intellectually disabled people.

    “It’s unacceptable that government decisions have resulted in trauma for disabled people, their families, and carers. Clinicians are clearly seeing a decline in the mental health of their intellectually disabled patients as a result,” Priyanca Radhakrishnan said.

    A report in the New Zealand Medical Journal published today, outlines clinicians’ concerns that intellectually disabled people are being declined residential placements because of the government’s freeze on new placements. They note this is leading to an increase in high-risk suicidal and violent behaviour.

    “We have been down this road before and know the dangers which come with institutionalisation. We’ve seen in the Royal Commission of Inquiry, the risks of returning to a time where individuals were placed into care completely unfit for their needs.

    “These cuts take us back decades and are causing years of irreversible harm for disabled people and their families. Some have been unable to transition back to the community, and are effectively trapped in hospitals, blocking access to others who need care.

    “With the funding freeze meaning no new residential places are funded, families who’d already made the decision to place a loved one in a care home after visiting the residence have now been locked out of this option.

    “Louise Upston needs to start taking responsibility for this and stop blaming Needs Assessment and Service Coordination (NASC) services.

    “She must reverse these changes immediately and ensure that NASCs are supported to honour the care packages previously agreed upon so that all disabled people, their families and carers can access the support they need,” Priyanca Radhakrishnan said.


    Stay in the loop by signing up to our mailing list and following us on FacebookInstagram, and X.

    MIL OSI New Zealand News

  • MIL-OSI China: Shopping centers have stellar year

    Source: China State Council Information Office

    People shop at Haikou International Duty-Free Shopping Complex in Haikou, south China’s Hainan Province, Feb. 11, 2024. [Photo/Xinhua]

    China’s shopping centers saw broad growth in sales, foot traffic and rental income in 2024, according to a shopping center industry report, recently released by the China Chain Store & Franchise Association.

    The report found that 73 percent of surveyed venues recorded year-on-year sales growth, with the majority seeing moderate increases.

    Nearly half achieved growth of up to 10 percent, while 20 percent posted gains exceeding that threshold.

    More than half of venues surveyed also reported an increase in online sales, underscoring the effectiveness of an omni-channel strategy that integrates digital and offline operations with innovative marketing.

    Shopping centers have actively expanded their online business to drive sales. For instance, Wushang Group, a leading shopping mall operator in Wuhan, Hubei province, saw its online transaction volume rise 20 percent year-on-year in 2024, with online orders surging 77 percent and the number of online users 25 percent higher, according to the company.

    The report’s findings were based on a survey of CCFA member companies, including the top 100 shopping centers and major comprehensive retailers. A total of 113 venues spanning 41 enterprises participated in the survey.

    Foot traffic also saw an overall uptrend, with 15 shopping centers reporting increases of up to 20 percent, while others experienced more moderate gains. The data highlight a steady rise in consumer visits throughout the year, contributing to stronger overall sales performance, said the report.

    Member-driven consumption remained a key contributor to total annual sales, with 76 venues reporting an increase in the proportion of revenue generated by their membership programs, while 31 saw no change.

    Rental income also improved, with 70 percent of surveyed locations reporting year-on-year growth. Among them, several recorded increases of more than 10 percent, while a smaller proportion achieved gains exceeding 20 percent.

    Despite China’s vast retail market and diverse business entities, the sector still faces challenges such as uneven development and intensifying competition.

    Industry experts said that diversified supply will shape the next phase of retail growth, as new national policies create fresh opportunities in previously overlooked segments.

    Meng Yi, head of the northern commercial department at Cushman & Wakefield, said the commercial sector is shifting back to a demand-driven, people-oriented model.

    Meng told the Beijing News that both population density and increasing demand for high-quality services will drive future retail transformations.

    Sectors catering to the silver economy, healthcare, multigenerational education, and cultural, commercial and sports-related experiences are all poised for expansion, he said.

    With strong government policy support, these segments are expected to become key drivers of China’s next wave of retail growth, Meng added.

    MIL OSI China News

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Appointment to Old Parliament House Board

    Source: Australian Ministers for Infrastructure and Transport

    The Albanese Labor Government has appointed Lenda Oshalem as Deputy Chair of the Board of Old Parliament House and Warren Snowdon as a member of the Board.

    Minister for the Arts, Tony Burke, congratulated Ms Oshalem on her appointment and welcomed Mr Snowdon to the Board. 

    “Lenda has been a valuable member of the Board for more than four years, and I trust she will draw on her skills and experience to make an excellent Deputy Chair. 

    “Warren has dedicated a large part of his life to the Australian Parliament, and we are lucky to have someone with his experience to help guide the national institution that tells the story of our democracy.”

    Old Parliament House was the home of the Federal Parliament from 1927 to 1988.

    It is home to the Museum of Australian Democracy, which provides an enriched understanding of the political legacy and value of Australian democracy. 

    Ms Lenda Oshalem has been a member of the Board since 2021 and was reappointed for a second term in 2024. She is the Executive Director of Advocacy and Engagement at the Minderoo Foundation, and the Chair of Minderoo Pictures.

    Ms Oshalem’s previous roles include Board member of Auspire – the Australia Day Council Western Australia Board, Management Committee Member at the Metropolitan Migrant Resource Centre, National Campaigns Director and Partner at SEC Newgate, and Assistant State Secretary and Assistant State Campaign Director for  WA Labor. 

    The Hon Warren Snowdon is a former Federal Minister and longtime Member of the House of Representatives, elected initially as Member for the Northern Territory from 1987-1996 and from 1998-2001, then as Member for Lingiari from 2001-2022. 

    A Government Relations Advisor for Diabetes Australia, Mr Snowdon also sits on the Board of Soldier On Australia. Since 2022, he has served as a member of the Advisory Board of the Indigenous Eye Health Unit at the University of Melbourne. 

    In 2024, Mr Snowdon was appointed as Chair of the independent review of the Northern Australia Infrastructure Facility Act 2016 and was appointed to the Australian War Memorial Council.

    More information about the Old Parliament House Board can be found here: www.moadoph.gov.au/about/board-old-parliament-house

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Cramer, Thune Introduce Death Tax Repeal Act

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator Kevin Cramer (R-ND)
    WASHINGTON, D.C. – The impacts of the federal estate tax, often referred to as the death tax, were reduced in 2017 with the passage of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which doubled the amount exempt from the tax and tied it to inflation. These tax cuts, unless extended, expire in 2025. In particular, the death tax significantly impacts family farms, ranches, and small businesses.
    U.S. Senator Kevin Cramer (R-ND) joined U.S. Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) in introducing the Death Tax Repeal Act. This legislation would permanently repeal the federal estate tax and generation-skipping transfer taxes, reduce the federal gift tax from 40 percent to 35 percent, and retain the full step-up in basis.
    “Taxing the assets of people who have died is wrong on multiple levels, starting with the fact the same income is taxed twice, during life and after death,” said Cramer. “It’s hard to imagine a less moral government imposition than taxing death.”
    “Family farms and ranches play a vital role in our economy and are the lifeblood of rural communities in South Dakota,” said Thune. “Losing even one of them to the death tax is one too many. It’s time to put an end to this punishing, burdensome tax once and for all so that family farms, ranches and small businesses can grow and thrive without costly estate planning or massive tax burdens that can threaten their viability.”
    Cramer supported related efforts when Congress debated the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.
    The bill is endorsed by supported by more than 190 members of the Family Business Coalition and more than 105 members of the Family Business Estate Tax Coalition, which includes the National Federation of Independent Business, the National Restaurant Association, the National Association of Home Builders, and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.
    Cosponsors of the bill include U.S. Senators Jim Banks (R-IN), John Barrasso (R-WY), Marsha Blackburn (R-TN), John Boozman (R-AR), Katie Britt (R-AL), Ted Budd (R-NC), Shelley Moore Capito (R-WV), John Cornyn (R-TX), Tom Cotton (R-AR), Mike Crapo (R-ID), Ted Cruz (R-TX), John Curtis (R-UT), Steve Daines (R-MT), Joni Ernst (R-IA), Deb Fischer (R-NE), Lindsay Graham (R-SC), Chuck Grassley (R-IA), Bill Hagerty (R-TN), Josh Hawley (R-MO), John Hoeven (R-ND), Cindy Hyde-Smith (R-MS), Ron Johnson (R-WI), Jim Justice (R-WV), John Kennedy (R-LA), James Lankford (R-OK), Mike Lee (R-UT), Cynthia Lummis (R-WY), Roger Marshall (R-KS), Mitch McConnell (R-KY), Dave McCormick (R-PA), Jerry Moran (R-KS), Bernie Moreno (R-OH), Markwayne Mullin (R-OK), Pete Ricketts (R-NE), Jim Risch (R-ID), Mike Rounds (R-SD), Eric Schmitt (R-MO), Rick Scott (R-FL), Tim Scott (R-SC), Tim Sheehy (R-MT), Thom Tillis (R-NC), Tommy Tuberville (R-AL), Roger Wicker (R-MS), and Todd Young (R-IN).
    Click here for bill text.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Senator Markey Joins Entire Democratic Caucus in Raising Alarm Over Trump Admin Pushing Illegal Indiscriminate Funding Cuts to NIH, Derailing Lifesaving Research

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Massachusetts Ed Markey

    Washington (February 13, 2025) – Senator Edward J. Markey (D-Mass.) today joined the entire Senate Democratic Caucus in sending a letter to U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. expressing serious alarm over the Trump Administration’s recent decisions that threaten to undermine America’s biomedical research infrastructure and set us back generations. The steps the Trump administration has taken would create a serious funding shortfall for research institutions nationwide, threaten to undermine progress on lifesaving scientific advancements, and could cost the U.S. economy billions of dollars and threaten the livelihoods of hundreds of thousands of workers. 

    “As the largest public funder of biomedical research in the world, NIH plays a critical role in sustaining the research infrastructure necessary for scientific breakthroughs in cancer treatment, infectious disease prevention, and medical technology innovation, among many others. President Trump has wreaked havoc on the nation’s biomedical research system in recent weeks. In his first several days in office, President Trump imposed a hiring freeze, communications freeze, ban on travel, and cancellation of grant review and advisory panels that are necessary to advance research. While some of these efforts have been reversed, they continue to cause confusion and miscommunication among researchers and recipients of NIH funds,” the lawmakers wrote.

    Last week, the NIH announced it would set the maximum reimbursement rate for indirect costs to 15 percent—creating a serious funding shortfall for research institutions of all types across the country. This move would dismantle the biomedical research system and stifle the development of new cures for disease. It won’t produce cost savings—it will just shift costs to states who can’t afford to pay the difference. Importantly, this action by the Trump administration is illegal—Congress’ bipartisan Labor-HHS-Education Appropriations Bill prohibits modifications to NIH’s indirect costs.

    “This change to NIH’s indirect cost rate represents an indiscriminate funding cut that will be nothing short of catastrophic for the lifesaving research that patients and families are counting on. The Administration’s new policy means that research will come to a halt, sick kids may not get the treatment they need, and clinical trials may shut down abruptly,” the senators wrote. On Monday, a federal judge in Boston temporarily blocked the NIH rate cut and set a hearing for February 21st.

    The senators’ letter points out that, in addition to the stifling impact on discovering new cures and ripping away treatment from those who need it, changes to NIH policy and communications threaten jobs in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. NIH research supported more than 412,000 jobs and fueled nearly $93 billion in new economic activity in Fiscal Year 2023 and every dollar the NIH invests in research generates almost $2.50 in economic activity. 

    “The Trump Administration has left researchers, universities, and health systems with great uncertainty about whether they can continue to support entire research programs and patient clinical trials across the country. Institutions and grantees nationwide are dealing with an unprecedented external communications “pause” enacted by new leadership at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the lack of transparency regarding the Administration’s illegal funding freeze, and the uncertainty of how new Executive Orders would be applied to their critical work. These actions resulted in NIH freezing grant reviews and cancelling advisory meetings, delaying critical funding that scientists need to continue advancing new cures and treatments. These disruptions do not just slow research—they cost lives,” the senators continued.

    “Our standing as a world leader in funding and producing new medical and scientific innovations has been put at risk by these recent actions from the Trump Administration. We urge you to stop playing political games with the lifesaving work of the NIH and to allow NIH research to continue uninterrupted.”

    The letter was led by Senator Patty Murray (D-Wash.) and signed by the entire Senate Democratic caucus: Senators Angela Alsobrooks (D-MD), Tammy Baldwin (D-WI), Michael Bennet (D-CO), Richard Blumenthal (D-CT), Lisa Blunt Rochester (D-DE), Cory Booker (D-NJ), Maria Cantwell (D-WA), Chris Coons (D-DE), Catherine Cortez Masto (D-NV), Tammy Duckworth (D-IL), Dick Durbin (D-IL), John Fetterman (D-PA), Ruben Gallego (D-AZ), Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY), Maggie Hassan (D-NH), Martin Heinrich (D-NM), John Hickenlooper (D-CO), Mazie Hirono (D-HI), Tim Kaine (D-VA), Mark Kelly (D-AZ), Andy Kim (D-NJ), Angus King (I-ME), Amy Klobuchar (D-MN), Ben Ray Luján (D-NM), Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Chris Murphy (D-CT), Jon Ossoff (D-GA), Alex Padilla (D-CA), Gary Peters (D-MI), Jack Reed (D-RI), Jacky Rosen (D-NV), Bernie Sanders (I-VT), Brian Schatz (D-HI), Adam Schiff (D-CA), Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY), Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH), Elissa Slotkin (D-MI), Tina Smith (D-MN), Chris Van Hollen (D-MD), Mark Warner (D-VA), Raphael Warnock (D-GA), Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), Peter Welch (D-VT), Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI), and Ron Wyden (D-OR) signed onto the letter.

    A PDF of the letter is available HERE and the full text is below.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Murphy Demands Investigation Into Elon Musk’s Access To Americans’ Personal Information

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Connecticut – Chris Murphy

    February 13, 2025

    WASHINGTON—U.S. Senator Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) sent a letter to Gene L. Dodaro, U.S. Comptroller General and head of the Government Accountability Office (GAO), calling for an investigation into the legality and scope of the agreement authorizing Elon Musk and his aides to use private servers to access sensitive and classified information. Murphy also requested a review of their designation as ‘special government employees’ (SGEs) and urged the GAO to assess whether they adhered to federal ethics and security requirements.

    “While the designation absolves Musk and his aides of some government requirements that apply to most federal employees, it does not absolve them of all obligations, nor does such a designation afford Musk and his aides carte blanche access to government data and servers,” Murphy wrote. “I also believe that Musk and his aides are subject to various conflict of interest statutes which prohibit federal employees from participating in matters that impact their own financial interests. Given the authority that President Trump has ceded to Musk and his aides, it is imperative the public understands whether Musk and his aides have complied with the law and whether highly sensitive data could be at risk if accessed by private actors who seek to benefit from the information illegally, or worse, by foreign adversaries who wish to attack this country.”

    Murphy warned the SGE designation could be exploited to give Trump’s political allies access to sensitive data without complying with ethics rules, referencing concerns of his colleagues from 2015: “As Senator Charles Grassley has rightly noted, the use of this designation at times has allowed some of the President’s political allies to work for the government while keeping their private sector jobs. Under this designation, many standard ethics and disclosure requirements are circumvented, but not all. In this case, press reports state Musk and his aides have set up private servers in at least one, and possibly multiple, federal agencies. This is very alarming if true. As Senator Grassley noted, “[t]he public’s business ought to be public with few exceptions…When employees are allowed to serve the government and the private sector at the same time and use private email, the employees have access to everything and the public, nothing.”

    In 2013, Senator Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and other Senate Republicans raised repeated concerns about Hillary Clinton’s use of the SGE designation as U.S. Secretary of State and the use of private emails and servers to conduct government business. At the time, Grassley warned, “This is worrisome because if the government isn’t properly tracking who holds this designation, it may be failing to catch conflicts of interest between government service and private-sector jobs.”

    Full text of the letter is available HERE and below:

    Dear Comptroller General Dodaro,

    I write to request an investigation into the legality and scope of the agreement authorizing Elon Musk and his private aides to utilize private servers to access, obtain information on, and otherwise enter varying levels of sensitive and classified information that belongs to the federal government, and to work in the federal government as ‘special government employees’ (SGE).

    On Monday, February 3, 2025, a White House official confirmed that Elon Musk (and by extension, his aides) have been designated SGEs. While the designation absolves Musk and his aides of some government requirements that apply to most federal employees, it does not absolve them of all obligations, nor does such a designation afford Musk and his aides carte blanche access to government data and servers. I also believe that Musk and his aides are subject to various conflict of interest statutes which prohibit federal employees from participating in matters that impact their own financial interests. Given the authority that President Trump has ceded to Musk and his aides, it is imperative the public understands whether Musk and his aides have complied with the law and whether highly sensitive data could be at risk if accessed by private actors who seek to benefit from the information illegally, or worse, by foreign adversaries who wish to attack this country.

    As Senator Charles Grassley has rightly noted, the use of this designation at times has allowed some of the President’s political allies to work for the government while keeping their private sector jobs. Under this designation, many standard ethics and disclosure requirements are circumvented, but not all. In this case, press reports state Musk and his aides have set up private servers in at least one, and possibly multiple, federal agencies. This is very alarming if true. As Senator Grassley noted, “[t]he public’s business ought to be public with few exceptions…When employees are allowed to serve the government and the private sector at the same time and use private email, the employees have access to everything and the public, nothing.”

    Specifically, I ask you to examine, and make publicly available, the following:

    1. any agreements, and any related documents, concerning the designation of Musk and his aides as ‘special designation employees;’
    2. all documents associated with required ethics compliance for Musk and his aides, including whether the required financial disclosures have occurred;
    3. whether all ethics officers at the relevant agencies were consulted or aware of the presence of Musk and his aides and compliance with federal law;
    4. the security of the private servers, including whether such servers can be exploited or accessed by individuals without appropriate security clearances;
    5. the names of the individuals who used, or continue to use, private e-mail addresses to conduct the business of the federal government (and for these individuals, identify any dual employment);
    1. whether any work-related emails from such servers have been deleted;
    1. whether any “Department considered any other candidates besides [Musk and his aides] for the expert position requiring expert knowledge on policy, administrative, and other matters? If so, please provide the supporting documentation. If not, why not?”
    2. whether [Musk and his aides] will be “reminded before [their] departure from government employment about [their] obligations in preserving [their] email communications and records;”
    3. whether Musk and his aides have adhered to legal obligations and otherwise to safeguard data, including, but not limited to, creating data inventories, undertaking data minimization and purpose limitation, and adhering to the highest levels of cybersecurity to protect the data from exploitation and exfiltration; and
    4. whether Musk and his aides can identify whether any data that they have accessed (within their authorized access level or not), has also been accessed impermissibly by any other party without authorization, and if so, what remedial measures have taken place.

    Given the stakes of what has occurred, I request that you expedite this investigation.

    Respectfully submitted,

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Murphy, Blumenthal, Democratic Caucus Raise Alarm Over Trump Admin Pushing Illegal Indiscriminate Funding Cuts To NIH, Derailing Lifesaving Research

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Connecticut – Chris Murphy
    WASHINGTON—U.S. Senators Chris Murphy (D-Conn.), a member of the U.S. Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP) Committee, and Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) joined 45 of their Senate colleagues in sending a letter to U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. expressing serious alarm over the Trump Administration’s recent decisions that threaten to undermine America’s biomedical research infrastructure and set us back generations. The steps the Trump administration has taken would create a serious funding shortfall for research institutions nationwide, threaten to undermine progress on lifesaving scientific advancements, and could cost the U.S. economy billions of dollars and threaten the livelihoods of hundreds of thousands of workers. 
    “As the largest public funder of biomedical research in the world, NIH plays a critical role in sustaining the research infrastructure necessary for scientific breakthroughs in cancer treatment, infectious disease prevention, and medical technology innovation, among many others,” the senators wrote. “President Trump has wreaked havoc on the nation’s biomedical research system in recent weeks. In his first several days in office, President Trump imposed a hiring freeze, communications freeze, ban on travel, and cancellation of grant review and advisory panels that are necessary to advance research. While some of these efforts have been reversed, they continue to cause confusion and miscommunication among researchers and recipients of NIH funds.”
    Last week, the NIH announced it would set the maximum reimbursement rate for indirect costs to 15 percent—creating a serious funding shortfall for research institutions of all types across the country. This move would dismantle the biomedical research system and stifle the development of new cures for disease. It won’t produce cost savings—it will just shift costs to states who can’t afford to pay the difference. Importantly, this action by the Trump administration is illegal—Congress’ bipartisan Labor-HHS-Education Appropriations Bill prohibits modifications to NIH’s indirect costs.
    “This change to NIH’s indirect cost rate represents an indiscriminate funding cut that will be nothing short of catastrophic for the lifesaving research that patients and families are counting on. The Administration’s new policy means that research will come to a halt, sick kids may not get the treatment they need, and clinical trials may shut down abruptly,” the senators added. On Monday, a federal judge in Boston temporarily blocked the NIH rate cut and set a hearing for February 21.
    The senators’ letter points out that, in addition to the stifling impact on discovering new cures and ripping away treatment from those who need it, changes to NIH policy and communications threaten jobs in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. NIH research supported more than 412,000 jobs and fueled nearly $93 billion in new economic activity in Fiscal Year 2023 and every dollar the NIH invests in research generates almost $2.50 in economic activity. 
    “The Trump Administration has left researchers, universities, and health systems with great uncertainty about whether they can continue to support entire research programs and patient clinical trials across the country. Institutions and grantees nationwide are dealing with an unprecedented external communications ‘pause’ enacted by new leadership at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the lack of transparency regarding the Administration’s illegal funding freeze, and the uncertainty of how new Executive Orders would be applied to their critical work. These actions resulted in NIH freezing grant reviews and cancelling advisory meetings, delaying critical funding that scientists need to continue advancing new cures and treatments. These disruptions do not just slow research—they cost lives,” the senators continued.
    They concluded: “Our standing as a world leader in funding and producing new medical and scientific innovations has been put at risk by these recent actions from the Trump Administration. We urge you to stop playing political games with the lifesaving work of the NIH and to allow NIH research to continue uninterrupted.”
    U.S. Senators Patty Murray (D-Wash.), Angela Alsobrooks (D-Md.), Tammy Baldwin (D-Wis.), Michael Bennet (D-Colo.), Lisa Blunt Rochester (D-Del.), Cory Booker (D-N.J.), Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.), Chris Coons (D-Del.), Catherine Cortez Masto (D-Nev.), Tammy Duckworth (D-Ill.), Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), John Fetterman (D-Pa.), Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.), Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.), Maggie Hassan (D-N.H.), Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), John Hickenlooper (D-Colo.), Mazie Hirono (D-Hawaii), Tim Kaine (D-Va.), Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.), Andy Kim (D-N.J.), Angus King (I-Maine), Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), Ben Ray Luján (D-N.M.), Ed Markey (D-Mass.), Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), Jon Ossoff (D-Ga.), Alex Padilla (D-Calif.), Gary Peters (D-Mich.), Jack Reed (D-R.I.), Jacky Rosen (D-Nev.), Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii), Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.), Elissa Slotkin (D-Mich.), Tina Smith (D-Minn.), Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.), Mark Warner (D-Va.), Raphael Warnock (D-Ga.), Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Peter Welch (D-Vt.), Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.), and Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) also signed the letter.
    Full text of the letter is available HERE and below.
    Dear Secretary Kennedy,
    We write to express our serious concern with the Trump Administration’s recent decisions that threaten to undermine the nation’s biomedical research infrastructure and set us back generations. The steps the Trump Administration has taken will create a serious funding shortfall for research institutions nationwide, threaten to undermine progress on lifesaving scientific advancements, could cost the U.S. economy billions of dollars, and threaten the livelihoods of hundreds of thousands of workers. 
    As the largest public funder of biomedical research in the world, NIH plays a critical role in sustaining the research infrastructure necessary for scientific breakthroughs in cancer treatment, infectious disease prevention, and medical technology innovation, among many others. President Trump has wreaked havoc on the nation’s biomedical research system in recent weeks. In his first several days in office, President Trump imposed a hiring freeze, communications freeze, ban on travel, and cancellation of grant review and advisory panels that are necessary to advance research. While some of these efforts have been reversed, they continue to cause confusion and miscommunication among researchers and recipients of NIH funds.
    Just last week, NIH announced an illegal plan to cap indirect cost rates that research institutions rely on. In capping indirect cost rates at 15 percent for NIH-funded grants, this policy would cut funding essential for conducting research, such as operating and maintaining laboratories, equipment, and research facilities. This change to NIH’s indirect cost rate represents an indiscriminate funding cut that will be nothing short of catastrophic for the lifesaving research that patients and families are counting on. The Administration’s new policy means that research will come to a halt, sick kids may not get the treatment they need, and clinical trials may shut down abruptly.
    These confusing and harmful policy changes threaten patient safety. The strength of the American research enterprise – recognized as the best in the world – is built on Congress’ bipartisan commitment to supporting essential research infrastructure. This funding, which Congress has long appropriated on a bipartisan basis, fuels groundbreaking medical discoveries and cements the United States’ position as the global leader in biomedical research.
    In addition to the stifling impact on discovering new cures and ripping away treatment from those who need it, changes to NIH policy and communications threaten jobs in all 50 states and the District of Columbia, with everyone from custodians, to research trainees, to scientists facing potential layoffs. NIH research supported more than 412,000 jobs and fueled nearly $93 billion in new economic activity in Fiscal Year 2023. Every dollar the NIH invests in research generates almost $2.50 in economic activity. These reckless policy changes not only threaten biomedical innovation and research, but also the livelihoods of thousands of workers in every state across the nation.
    The Trump Administration has left researchers, universities, and health systems with great uncertainty about whether they can continue to support entire research programs and patient clinical trials across the country. Institutions and grantees nationwide are dealing with an unprecedented external communications “pause” enacted by new leadership at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the lack of transparency regarding the Administration’s illegal funding freeze, and the uncertainty of how new Executive Orders would be applied to their critical work. These actions resulted in NIH freezing grant reviews and cancelling advisory meetings, delaying critical funding that scientists need to continue advancing new cures and treatments. These disruptions do not just slow research – they cost lives.
    The NIH plays a critical role in our nation’s efforts to fund scientific advancements that improve health and save lives. Our standing as a world leader in funding and producing new medical and scientific innovations has been put at risk by these recent actions from the Trump Administration. We urge you to stop playing political games with the lifesaving work of the NIH and to allow NIH research to continue uninterrupted.
    Sincerely,

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-Evening Report: Parliament has passed landmark election donation laws. They may be a ‘stitch up’ but they also improve Australia’s democracy

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Joo-Cheong Tham, Professor, Melbourne Law School, The University of Melbourne

    Federal parliament has passed the biggest changes to Australia’s electoral funding laws in decades.

    The Albanese government’s Electoral Legislation Amendment (Electoral Reform) Bill 2024 cleared the Senate on Wednesday night after just two hours of debate on amendments agreed to earlier by the Coalition. In blatant disregard for democracy, the government refused to refer the bill to a parliamentary committee for proper scrutiny.

    The amendments fail to address numerous deficiencies in the original bill that was introduced last November. Transparency has been wound back and hollow contribution caps have been locked in.

    In significant respects, however, the package is an improvement on the status quo, which has seen unrestricted donations and spending flourish. So, too, secrecy.

    We need to penetrate the sound and fury of partisanship and assess the substance of these laws. This will yield a much more nuanced picture than conveyed by cross bench claims of a major party stitch up.

    Some improvement to transparency

    The government originally proposed lowering the disclosure threshold for donations from $16,000 to $1,000. The revised bill settles on a new threshold of $5,000.

    The amendments fail to plug a loophole that allows a donor to give separately to all of the branches attached to a political party if each individual contribution is just under the threshold. For example, a donor could spread almost $45,000 to the nine state and federal branches of the ALP without being required to declare the amounts.

    But the new laws will usher in near-real time disclosure and substantially reduce “dark money”, a seismic shift from the secrecy and lack of timeliness in the regime it replaces.

    Hollow donation caps

    Under the reforms, a series of contribution caps have been introduced to curb the influence of big money in politics.

    In my assessment of the original bill, I highlighted how the caps would prevent multi-million dollar contributions from cashed-up individuals.

    The amendments go further by closing a number of sizeable loopholes. Self financing candidates, such as Clive Palmer and Malcolm Turnbull will be subject to the contribution caps. The current exclusions for membership and affiliation fees to associated entities – “disguised donations” – will also be caught by the caps.

    But any positives are emphatically outweighed by the “annual gift cap” more than doubling to $50,000. The same “spreading” loophole that applies to the disclosure obligations would allow a donor to to give just shy of this amount to each of a party’s state and federal branches across the country. The major parties could reap up to almost $450,000 per annum from a single donor.

    And the “overall gift cap” on total donations made to political parties and candidates is a generous $1.6 million, which means large contributions will still be permissible under the new framework.

    The government has also failed to remove the patently unfair provisions relating to “nominated entities”, which are likely to be used by the major parties as investment vehicles.

    As the Victorian Electoral Review Expert Panel has rightly noted, such entities:

    provide some (parties) with significantly more funds, creating a risk that those (parties) drown out other voices.

    Election spending contained and fairer

    The spending caps in the new finance laws are fundamentally unaltered by the government’s amendments.

    The $800,000 per electorate limit, and $90 million per party nationally, will contain the “arms race” that has necessitated “big money” fundraising and fuelled unfair contests.

    However, the limits are set too high and will benefit the established parties due to the narrow scope of the spending caps in individual electorates. This means the major parties will be able to shift funding to must-win seats without being caught by the electorate caps.

    This shortcoming has been seized upon as clear evidence that Labor and the Liberals are seeking to kneecap Teal election campaigns. While having some force, these criticisms should be viewed in the context of the current situation where the major parties have an unfettered ability to direct spending to marginal seats, a situation which the Teals are ironically defending with their opposition to spending caps.

    The importance of public funding

    The new regime includes a substantial jump in public funding from $3.50 to $5 per vote.

    Crossbenchers, such as Kate Chaney, are opposed, to the increase, saying it will entrench the might of the majors while making it harder for new independents:

    The effect of increasing public funding is that political parties don’t have to fundraise because they’ve got their war chests. But any challengers do have to fundraise.

    While there is a clear risk of unfairness, the crossbench position throws the baby out with the bathwater. It romanticises the role of private funding, skating over the risks of corruption and undue influence via large donations.

    The public funding of political parties and candidates is warranted. But there should be a conversation about the design and scope of taxpayer support.

    The political finance laws could be made considerably fairer by fixing the structural bias that favours incumbents, including teal MPs. And they don’t need to be as generous given the large flows of private funding that will continue under the shallow contribution caps.

    Unfinished business

    Bad processes tend to make bad laws. The government’s actions have cast a pall of illegitimacy over its political finance regime. The new framework is unfair and ineffectual in significant ways and yet democracy enhancing in others.

    We are all trustees of democracy, with an obligation to protect and deepen democratic practices. An urgent task in that continuing struggle is to protect the strengths of these laws while jettisoning the elements that are egregiously bad.

    Joo-Cheong Tham has received funding from the Australian Research Council, the Australian Council of Trade Unions, European Trade Union Institute, International IDEA, the New South Wales Electoral Commission, the New South Wales Independent Commission Against Corruption and the Victorian Electoral Commission. He is a Director of the Centre for Public Integrity; Expert Network Member of Climate Integrity; a Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences in Australia; and the Victorian Division Assistant Secretary (Academic Staff) of the National Tertiary Education Union.

    ref. Parliament has passed landmark election donation laws. They may be a ‘stitch up’ but they also improve Australia’s democracy – https://theconversation.com/parliament-has-passed-landmark-election-donation-laws-they-may-be-a-stitch-up-but-they-also-improve-australias-democracy-249588

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Chief Officer of NTES appointed

    Source: Northern Territory Police and Fire Services

    The Northern Territory Fire and Emergency Services (NTFES) is pleased to announce the appointment of Mr Wayne Snell as Chief Officer of NT Emergency Service (NTES), following an extensive merit-based selection process.

    Mr Snell’s appointment brings stability and renewed energy to NTES, particularly following its transition to NTFES in 2024.

    With over 35 years of emergency management and leadership experience, Mr Snell has held senior management roles both nationally and internationally for more than 20 years. His career includes prominent positions at the Australian Civil Military Centre, the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO), and as Commander of the New South Wales State Emergency Service, State Operations.

    Additionally, Mr Snell has worked with leading state, national, and international policing organisations, including INTERPOL and the Australian Federal Police (AFP).

    His qualifications span emergency management, human resources, law enforcement, training, fire investigation, and forensic science.

    Mr Snell succeeds Ms Fleur O’Connor, who has made invaluable contributions to NTES during her time as Chief Officer. NTFES thanks Ms O’Connor for her dedication and service and wishes her all the best.

    Quotes from Commissioner, NT Fire and Emergency Services, Andrew Warton:

    “I am pleased to welcome Wayne into the role of Chief Officer with NTES. He brings with him a wealth of knowledge and experience from his extensive career in emergency management both in Australia and internationally.”
    “I also want to express my sincere thanks to Ms. Fleur O’Connor for her significant contributions to the service.”

    Quotes from incoming Chief Officer, NTES, Mr Wayne Snell:

    “It is an honour to join the NT Emergency Service at such a pivotal moment, as it transitions into the NFES standalone agency.”

    “My focus will be on ensuring the safety of our communities, supporting our dedicated staff and volunteers, and strengthening our operational capabilities to respond effectively across the Territory.”

    “I look forward to bringing my leadership and experience to the Northern Territory and collaborating with the NTES team and the broader NTFES agency to enhance our community safety and capability.”

    Media contact
    Rickie Abraham

    8923 9803 

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI USA: U.S. Department of Energy Secretary Chris Wright Announces Key Senior Staff Appointments

    Source: US Department of Energy

    WASHINGTON— Today, U.S. Secretary of Energy Chris Wright announced key appointments to the Department’s senior leadership team, naming experienced professionals who will lead efforts to advance President Trump’s energy agenda. 

    “President Trump has outlined a bold and ambitious agenda for restoring American energy dominance, and this exceptional team of leaders will be essential to delivering that agenda in this critical moment,” Secretary Wright said. “Energy is essential to everything we do, and I look forward to working together to remove barriers to innovation, cut red tape and pursue common sense solutions for unleashing our energy potential. The American people deserve nothing less.”

    Key senior staff appointments include:

    Office of the Secretary
    Alexander Fitzsimmons, Chief of Staff
    Audrey Barrios, Advisor to the Secretary
    Mike Kopp, Senior Advisor to the Secretary
    Conner Prochaska, Senior Advisor
    Theodore Garrish, Senior Advisor
    John LaValle, White House Liaison
    Samuel Fodale, Deputy White House Liaison

    Office of the Under Secretary for Infrastructure
    Steven Winberg, Acting Under Secretary

    Office of Public Affairs
    Andrea Woods, Deputy Director
    Ben Dietderich, Press Secretary and Chief Spokesperson

    Office of Management
    Ashley Hebert, Director, Scheduling and Advance
    Isabelle Lamanna, Director of Scheduling

    Office of the Chief Financial Officer
    Joshua Jones, Senior Advisor

    Office of Clean Energy Demonstrations
    Curt Coccodrilli, Senior Advisor
    Cathleen Tripodi, Executive Director

    Office of Science
    Christian Newton, Chief of Staff

    Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization
    Charles Smith, Director

    Loan Programs Office
    John Sneed, Director

    Grid Deployment Office
    Joseph Alexander, Chief of Staff
    Christina Francone, Senior Advisor

    Assistant Secretary for Congressional and Intergovernmental Affairs
    Shawn Affolter, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary

    Assistant Secretary for Fossil Energy and Carbon Management
    Tala Goudarzi, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary 
    Kevin Tatulyan, Chief of Staff

    Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy
    Louis Hrkman, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary 

    Assistant Secretary for Electricity
    Catherine Jereza, Senior Advisor

    Assistant Secretary for Environmental Management
    Roger Jarrell, Senior Advisor

    Assistant Secretary for International Affairs
    William Joyce, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary
    Andrew Rapp, Senior Advisor

    State And Community Energy Programs
    Eric Mahroum, Director
     

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: WHAT THEY ARE SAYING: Secretary Wright Poised to Unleash American Energy Dominance

    Source: US Department of Energy

    WASHINGTON—This week, Chris Wright was sworn in as the 17th Secretary for the Department of Energy. Nominated by President Donald J. Trump for his leadership and experience in the energy sector, Secretary Wright has been at the forefront of expanding domestic production, strengthening critical infrastructure, and advancing policies that promote American energy independence. His expertise will be essential as the Department returns to regular order and works to advance President Trump’s energy dominance agenda.  

    Under Secretary Wright’s leadership, the Department will focus on streamlining operations, cutting regulatory burdens imposed by the previous Administration, prioritizing common-sense solutions and unleashing American energy to drive economic growth and strengthen national security. 

    Secretary Wright’s confirmation has been met with widespread praise from policymakers, industry leaders, and trade associations and others.

    What They’re Saying:        

    “As Secretary of Energy, Chris will be a key leader, driving innovation, cutting red tape, and ushering in a new ‘Golden Age of American Prosperity and Global Peace.’” – President Donald Trump 

    “America’s extraordinary new Energy Secretary, Chris Wright, will work alongside President Trump to restore American energy dominance. As an entrepreneur and leader in the energy sector, Chris has experienced the crushing weight of bureaucracy and knows that innovation – not regulation – is what drives down energy costs. House Republicans stand ready to work with Chris to advance policies that cut red tape for producers and lower costs for consumers.” – House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.)

    “Chris Wright has seen what American-made energy can do to improve human lives, bring people out of poverty, and remake entire societies. He will be an asset to President Trump’s energy team, and I look forward to seeing what he can accomplish to make our nation energy independent once again.” – U.S. Senator John Thune (R-S.D.), Senator Majority Leader

    “Secretary Chris Wright will help usher in the golden age of American energy dominance. He understands that affordable, abundant energy is the source of American strength. Under his leadership, we will use all of our nation’s vast energy resources to lower prices for families and grow our economy. I look forward to working with Secretary Wright and Secretary Doug Burgum to promote energy projects in Wyoming and across the country.” – U.S. Senator John Barrasso (R-Wyo.), Senate Majority Whip 

    “For the last four years, when Americans opened their energy bills, they didn’t see ‘climate plans’—they saw costs piling up and questions they couldn’t answer. With Chris Wright as Secretary of Energy, I am confident that we can reverse the irresponsible policies of the Biden administration and prioritize affordable and reliable energy. Under his leadership, the DOE will once again support the American worker, the American family, and the American future.” – U.S. Senator Mike Lee, Chairman, Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources (R-Utah)

    “Chris Wright is a successful Colorado entrepreneur with deep expertise in energy innovation and technology. He is passionate about strengthening America’s energy independence and lowering costs for Colorado families. While we don’t agree on everything, we look forward to working with him to ensure Colorado continues to lead the country in energy production and innovation.”  – U.S. Senator Michael Bennet (D-Colo.)

    “Chris Wright’s Liberty Energy company has been integral to the growth of North Dakota’s Bakken oil fields. From our shale play to carbon capture development, Chris knows the importance of energy innovation to the America First agenda.” – U.S. Senator Kevin Cramer (R-N.D.)

    “Christopher Wright has committed to an all-of-the-above domestic energy strategy that will advance and promote innovative solutions to achieve greater American energy excellence, leadership, and independence. He has an extensive background spanning many energy sources. Wright’s commitment to ensuring America is the leader in nuclear energy holds particular value for Idaho, which is home to one of the nation’s leading nuclear laboratories. Under his leadership at DOE, our nation will prioritize affordable, reliable, and secure energy sources that support American innovation and growth and improve the lives of Americans.”  – U.S. Senator Mike Crapo (R-Idaho)  

    “Time to unleash American energy! I look forward to working with Secretary of Energy Chris Wright to carry out President Trump’s agenda to support domestic energy production and jobs. Let’s get to work!” – U.S. Senator Steve Daines (R-Mont.)

    “Chris Wright is a scientist who has dedicated his life to the study and use of energy. He believes in science and supports the research that will deliver the affordable, reliable, and clean energy that will not only lower costs but make our country more secure. While we don’t always agree, we will work together because none of us have four years to wait to act.” – U.S. Senator John Hickenlooper (D-Colo.)

    “Chris Wright is another great addition to the Trump administration, bringing a wealth of knowledge and real-world experience to the job of Energy Secretary. He knows what it takes to develop new technologies and make them commercially viable. In North Dakota, we’ve seen firsthand his success in the private sector with the growth in the Bakken. We look forward to working with him in his new role to build upon that record of innovation and unleash America’s energy potential, including through North Dakota’s leadership in CCUS technologies.” – U.S. Senator John Hoeven (R-N.D.) 

    “Maintaining affordable and reliable energy will be key to both our economic success and national security in the years ahead. Secretary Wright understands the importance of utilizing our domestic energy resources to secure the grid, lower prices, and create family-sustaining jobs. I congratulate Secretary Wright on his confirmation and look forward to working with him to restore American energy dominance.” – U.S. Representative Brett Guthrie (R-Ky.), Chairman, House Committee on Energy and Commerce  

    “President Donald Trump made an excellent decision to nominate Chris Wright to be our next Secretary of Energy–I am confident that Secretary Wright will be a close ally and partner with me as Chairman of Energy and Water Appropriations to expand civil nuclear energy, modernize our nuclear deterrent, revitalize America’s defense industrial base, bring back critical mineral supply chains, and unleash all forms of American-made energy to get our economy back on track, lower costs for workers and families, and make the United States the number one energy producer and exporter in the world.”  – U.S. Representative Chuck Fleischmann (R-Tenn.), Chairman, House Appropriations Subcommittee on Energy and Water Development

    “Southeast Texas, the energy capital of the world, welcomes Secretary Chris Wright as our new leader of the Department of Energy. With his expertise and leadership, I am confident we will reverse the damage done to our energy industry, unleash American energy, and restore the United States as the dominant force on the world stage.” – U.S. Representative Randy Weber (R-Texas), Vice Chairman, Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Energy   

    “I am greatly looking forward to working with Chris Wright in his new role as Secretary of Energy. Secretary Wright deeply understands the undeniable link between energy security and national security, the importance of reliable energy infrastructure, and how overregulation has killed innovation. I am eager to work alongside him to unleash domestic energy production, advance critical technologies, and restore American dominance on the global stage.”  – U.S. Representative August Pfluger (R-Texas), Chairman, Republican Study Committee 

    “I’m glad to see the Senate confirm Secretary Chris Wright. Under the Trump administration, reliable and proven energy sources such as liquefied natural gas and nuclear will thrive, and costs will decline. The Congressional Western Caucus is committed to supporting Secretary Wright’s efforts to ensure a golden age for American energy.” – U.S. Representative Doug LaMalfa (R-Calif.), Chairman, Congressional Western Caucus  

    “Congratulations, Chris Wright! You understand the importance of affordable, reliable, AND sustainable energy. I’m excited for your forward-thinking leadership at the Department of Energy, which will help secure our grid, lower costs, reduce emissions, and help our allies around the world.” – U.S. Representative Julie Fedorchak (R-N.D.)

    “Congratulations to Chris Wright on his confirmation as President Trump’s Secretary of Energy! Under the Trump administration, we will unleash American energy—including biofuels—to lower prices at the pump and end our reliance on foreign countries for our energy needs.” – U.S. Representative Randy Feenstra (R-Iowa)

    “Chris Wright’s strengths as an innovator and strategic thinker will be invaluable in bringing new ideas to the National Energy Council.”  – Gale Norton, former U.S. Secretary of the Interior 

    “Congrats to our next Secretary of Energy, Chris Wright. With his background in engineering and developing the Bakken, Chris understands how innovation drives production—making America safer with abundant, affordable, and reliable energy. Good for our state, good for the nation.” – Governor Kelly Armstrong (R-N.D.)

    “Secretary Chris Wright’s experience in the American energy sector gives him an important perspective that will inform his leadership of the Department of Energy. We look forward to working with him to bolster American geopolitical strength by swiftly approving new LNG export permits and ensuring the open access of American energy for our allies around the world.” – Mike Sommers, President and CEO, American Petroleum Institute   

    “Throughout their confirmation hearings, Governor Burgum, Congressman Zeldin, and Chris Wright have each proven their expertise and made clear they intend to advance an America-first, all-of-the-above energy strategy. With their leadership, I am confident we can collaborate on pragmatic, conservative policies to lower energy costs for American families and businesses and create good-paying jobs across the country—all while ensuring a cleaner future for generations to come.” – Heather Reams, President, Citizens for Responsible Energy Solutions 

    “We look forward to working with Mr. Wright to prioritize programs that help keep the lights on for families and businesses across America. We also look forward to working with Mr. Wright and DOE to make effective and efficient use of the remaining infrastructure funding appropriated by Congress that supports investments in electric infrastructure and helps co-ops harden their systems.” – James Matheson, CEO, National Rural Electric Cooperative Association

    “We applaud the Senate’s confirmation of Chris Wright as Secretary of Energy. In this new role, Secretary Wright will play a pivotal role in furthering our nation’s energy and national security goals through prioritizing reliable, 24/7/365 energy generation, like clean nuclear energy. We look forward to working with Secretary Wright to continue our progress toward building the resilient, reliable, and affordable energy grid of the future.” – Maria Korsnick, President and CEO, Nuclear Energy Institute

    “On behalf of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) community, I’m pleased to congratulate Chris Wright on his confirmation as the U.S. Secretary of Energy. ASME continues to have strong alignment with the Department of Energy’s mission to advance our national energy goals, and we look forward to working with Secretary Wright to advance technology development, strengthen our energy workforce, and promote affordable, reliable, and sustainable energy.” – Thomas Costabile, Executive Director and CEO, American Society of Mechanical Engineers

    “With the Senate’s confirmation of Chris Wright, Doug Burgum, and Lee Zeldin, the United States is poised for a new era of energy leadership. These individuals are proven champions of energy development, job creation, and technological innovation. Under their leadership, we are confident that the United States will lead in energy and technology advancement, which will continue to become more hand in glove over time. The Digital Energy Council looks forward to working alongside the administration to ensure continued progress in the digital energy sector.” – Thomas Mapes, President, Digital Energy Council

    “PLASTICS extends our sincere congratulations to Chris Wright on his confirmation to serve as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Energy. Mr. Wright’s leadership in the energy sector, combined with his unwavering commitment to economic growth and job creation, aligns closely with the priorities of the plastics industry. We look forward to collaborating with Mr. Wright to implement practical, forward-thinking policies that will not only enhance the plastics industry but also promote sustainability, circularity, and responsible growth throughout the supply chain.” – Matt Seaholm, President and CEO, Plastics Industry Association 

    “Congratulations to Chris Wright on his confirmation as U.S. Secretary of Energy! With his expertise across nuclear, oil & gas, and renewables, America’s energy future is in strong hands.” – America First Policy Institute

    “Congratulations to Chris Wright on his confirmation as U.S. Secretary of Energy! With his deep expertise in energy innovation and commitment to affordability and reliability, we look forward to his leadership in shaping America’s energy future.” – The Colorado Business Roundtable

    “Chris is the right choice to reorient DOE toward a mission of bettering human lives—his passion has been evident for years.” – Western Energy Alliance

    “On behalf of EPSA and its members, I extend our congratulations to Secretary Chris Wright, Secretary Doug Burgum, and Administrator Lee Zeldin on their confirmations. We look forward to working with them to advance policies that enable infrastructure development and ensure Americans have access to reliable and cost-effective energy to meet the demands of a growing and evolving economy.” – Electric Power Supply Association 

    “Chris Wright as Secretary of Energy is a total game changer for American energy policy. We as a country are lucky that Chris’s vast energy knowledge, leadership abilities, and commitment to energy freedom will guide our energy policy.” – Alex Epstein, Author and Energy Advocate 
     

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Shaheen, Hoeven Call on Acting FAA Administrator to Urgently Address Air Traffic Controller Staffing Shortages

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for New Hampshire Jeanne Shaheen
    **Citing the deadly collision at Reagan National Airport and increasingly frequent near-misses at airports across the country, Senators request that the FAA work with Congress on ways to prevent future tragedies**
    (Washington, DC) – Following the deadliest commercial aviation incident on U.S. soil in more than 23 years last month, U.S. Senators Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH) and John Hoeven (R-ND) are calling on Acting Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Chris Rochelau to urgently work with Congress to address air traffic controller staffing shortages. In their letter, Shaheen and Hoeven highlight how increasingly frequent near-misses and crashes emphasize the need for the FAA to confront the shortage of air traffic controllers as part of any response to the fatal collision that took place on January 29, 2025. 
    In part, the Senators wrote: “We know the FAA understands the need to increase controller staffing: the agency raised their hiring goal to onboard a projected 17,125 controllers through Fiscal Year 2033. However, turning those goals into reality is far more challenging. According to the FAA, only 60% of controller trainees reach full certification within three years. And despite meeting self-imposed yearly staffing targets, attrition continues to keep pace with new hires. 
    They continued: “We ask that you work with Congress and the National Air Traffic Controllers Association to increase funding for operations, modernize facilities and equipment, expand the FAA training academy’s capacity, strengthen partnerships with aviation schools across the county and other ways to prevent partisan brinksmanship around government funding from shutting down operations.” 
    The Senators concluded: “For the sake of America’s traveling public, we can and must do better. At a minimum, we must commit to doing all we can to reinforce our certified professional controller (CPC) workforce and keep tragedies like this from becoming commonplace. We stand ready to work closely with you and your Administration to do everything in our power to prevent this from happening again.” 
    Full text of the letter can be found here. 
    A recent New York Times investigation found that in Fiscal Year 2023 there were 503 air traffic control lapses that the FAA preliminarily categorized as “significant,” which marks a 65 percent increase from the previous year. During that period, air traffic increased by about 4 percent. 
    At the end of Fiscal Year 2024, there were 1,020 fewer CPCs than there were at the end of Fiscal Year 2012 – marking a 9% decrease in air traffic controllers in the workforce. Last year, Congress passed the FAA Reauthorization Act with broad bipartisan support. The reauthorization legislation included provisions secured by Shaheen requiring the FAA, for the first time, to hire the maximum number of new controller trainees as can be trained annually at the FAA’s Academy in Oklahoma City for each of the five years of the law’s duration. 

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI China: China, Britain need to strengthen dialogue, communication

    Source: China State Council Information Office

    Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi, also a member of the Political Bureau of the Communist Party of China Central Committee, co-chairs the 10th China-UK Strategic Dialogue with British Foreign Secretary David Lammy in London, Britain, on Feb. 13, 2025. [Photo/Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs]

    China and Britain need to strengthen dialogue and communication, said visiting Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi in London on Thursday when he co-chaired the 10th China-UK Strategic Dialogue with British Foreign Secretary David Lammy.

    Wang, also a member of the Political Bureau of the Communist Party of China Central Committee, said China and Britain are different in system, history and culture, so it is only natural that there are some differences and disagreements.

    What is important is to establish an objective and rational understanding, and strengthen dialogue and communication in the spirit of mutual respect, he said.

    China regards Britain as an important strategic partner, stands ready to make good plans for high-level exchanges in the next stage, and deepen practical cooperation in various fields to promote a fresh outlook in bilateral relations in the new year, wang noted.

    China and Britain are both permanent members of the United Nations Security Council. Under the current circumstances, China and Britain should showcase their responsibility as major countries, practice multilateralism, support free trade, promote political settlement of hotspot issues, and jointly promote world peace and stability, he said.

    Wang also elaborated on China’s position on issues related to Taiwan, Hong Kong, and others.

    The two sides exchanged in-depth views on the Ukraine crisis. Wang explained China’s position in a comprehensive manner, stressing that China has always been guided by “the four points about what must be done” put forward by President Xi Jinping, and called for “no expansion of the battlefields, no escalation of hostilities, and no fanning flames.”

    Wang said China welcomes all efforts committed to peace talks and supports the building of a balanced, effective and sustainable European security architecture, to ultimately realize long-term peace and stability in Europe. He added China is willing to work with all parties, including the European side, to continue to play a constructive role in this regard.

    MIL OSI China News

  • MIL-OSI United Nations: Peace by chocolate: One Syrian refugee family’s journey to sweet success

    Source: United Nations 2

    “War can kill anything in a person, but it cannot kill values ​​and hope. Syrians are a naturally happy people, and we aspire to live in a spirit of giving, generosity and hospitality.”

    Just desserts

    With these words, Tareq Hadhad described to UN News the difficult journey his family took from the Syrian capital to the remote Canadian city of Antigonish.

    The Hadhads are a long-established Damascene family and from it came judges, engineers and doctors for generations. But, what they are best known for is chocolate, a legacy that Mr. Hadhad’s father, Issam, built in 1986.

    That year, the senior Mr. Hadhad decided to leave mechanical engineering and start making chocolate despite the fact that there were only a few well-known companies in the Middle East in that field at the time.

    Chocolate for good

    The younger Mr. Hadhad said his father wanted to be in a field that made people around him happy as frustration prevailed among Syria’s youth after the events of 1982, when the Hafez al Assad regime committed the Hama massacre.

    Founded “from scratch”, the company grew to employ hundreds of people.

    In 2008, it began exporting to several countries in the Middle East and Europe in line the senior Mr. Hadhad’s aspiration: to “deliver the message of the Syrians all over the world” through a universal product that everyone knew and loved, his son explained, adding that the goal was not only to increase sales, but to embark on several development and relief projects in Syria.

    “My father believed that if you are successful in your life, you have a responsibility to raise others to success,” Mr. Hadhad said.

    Peace by Chocolate

    Isam Hadhad makes chocolate in the factory.

    Time for survival

    Before 2013, the entire family of more than 60 people lived in one building chockful of memories just south of the Al-Midan area in old Damascus, standing their ground for two years after the war began.

    “I lost many members of my family,” Mr. Hadhad said. “My sister’s husband was arrested, tortured and then killed in prison. Many of my cousins ​​ disappeared, some of whom we still know nothing about and some of whom were summarily executed.”

    The chocolate factory was targeted in airstrike in 2012 and the following year, as Mr. Hadhad and his brother were walking in a street in downtown Damascus, a missile fell nearby.

    “Amid the dust, I thought my brother was dead,” he said. “I picked him up and ran home. When I got there, I told the family this is not the time to build a business or study. This is a time for survival.”

    ‘We are not victims’

    The family made the excruciating decision to seek refuge in Lebanon, leaving everything behind. The following year, they learned that the regime’s forces had “looted their homes, burned them down and bombed them to cover up the crime”.

    “There are many Syrians who have lost much more than us,” Mr. Hadhad said. “We are not victims. We are victors regardless of the outcome because we were able to survive the war with our lives and start our lives again.”

    The family registered with the UN refugee agency, UNHCR, and moved many times in Lebanon until they settled in the city of Sidon. While Mr. Hadhad said the Lebanese people were very hospitable to the Syrians, because no official agreements had been signed, they could not work, rent homes or go to school.

    Refugees giving back

    Lebanon, as a country of four to five million people at the time, received more than a million Syrian refugees in a very short period of time.

    “That’s equivalent to 10 to 15 million American refugees entering Canada in a year or two,” he said. “Of course, the country wouldn’t be able bear that burden. But, Lebanon absorbed that burden over 13 years.”

    Indeed, the burden of the war wasn’t just on Syria and the Syrian people, but on the peoples of the entire region, including the Jordanians, Lebanese, Turkish and Iraqis.

    However, the Hadhad family was determined “at every stage of our refugee story to prove to the world that we can give to the host community and not take”.

    For his part, Mr. Hadhad spent most of his days in Lebanon volunteering with several relief organizations, including the World Health Organization (WHO) and UNHCR, providing his expertise in healthcare to both Syrian refugees and their Lebanese hosts alike, having reached the final stages of his medical studies before leaving Syria.

    Canada bound

    The family’s goal was to return to Syria, but when that seemed like a distant dream and their fears grew for the future of the young children who had missed years of education, they began applying for resettlement in other countries.

    In 2015, despite many interviews at embassies from around the world, not a single one would accept them, Mr. Hadhad said.

    “Late that year, things changed,” he said. “The new Canadian Government had pledged to receive about 25,000 Syrian refugees, and my family was one of them.”

    Peace by Chocolate

    The Hadhad family celebrating Canada Day.

    UN intervention

    The UN was the turning point in the Hadhad family’s story. Without being identified as refugees by the UNHCR, they would not have been able to even apply for resettlement in Canada.

    The Canadian embassy conducts cross-checks through the UNHCR, and the International Organization for Migration (IOM) also played a key role in their resettlement process.

    But, the major credit goes to Canadians themselves. The tragic drowning of toddler Alan Kurdi and his family in the summer of 2015 while trying to reach Europe had spread throughout the globe, the cause of Syrian refugees became a global cause.

    Canadian hospitality, one family at a time

    Community leaders in Antigonish, Nova Scotia, home to 5,000 residents and 5,000 students at St. Francis Xavier University, raised enough money to host one Syrian family that matched the Hadhads, and so they sponsored them without knowing their names, the way they looked or even their backgrounds.

    “The community in Antigonish are pioneers in their DNA, and when they saw they could make a difference, they started the process of registering an organization called SAFE (Syrian Antigonish Families Embrace),” Mr. Hadhad said.

    “I don’t know how people who are almost 8,000km away from Syria or Lebanon could be so concerned with our ability to restart our lives and to see my siblings and my sister Alaa’s children go to school. I did not expect that there would be human beings among us on this planet with such a spirit of giving because we lived through wars and saw how people kill each other.”

    He said he came to Antigonish, on the eastern coast of Canada, because of them and because they believed that he, as a person, had the same values, dignity, respect, rights and freedoms that apply to anyone in Canada.

    One peace won’t hurt

    This act left a huge mark on him and prompted the family to do everything in their power to give back to the Canadian community “that believed in us and our humanity and tried to support us in every way”, he said.

    “This community restored our faith in humanity. Regardless of the colour of your skin, your religion or where you were born, you are qualified to be a human being.”

    It was also the community “that gave us the idea of ​peace with its kindness and generosity that match our values”, he added.

    Peace by Chocolate

    The original factory shed built by members of the community and located on the family’s property next to their home.

    ‘Peace by Chocolate’

    To prove that nothing is impossible with hope, the family spotted a niche job opportunity to build on the legacy they were forced to leave behind in Syria. While it took decades to register their chocolate company in Syria due to government corruption, it took only a few weeks in Canada.

    From there, the road to success began on all levels.

    “Our project did not start for a purely economic reason, nor did it start for a purely humanitarian purpose; it combined the two,” Mr. Hadhad said.

    “That is why we named it Peace by Chocolate. Many companies around the world aim to make profits, but our goal was to support the community and at the same time to try to grow the company to become one of the largest companies in Canada.”

    ‘Canadians pull together’

    A few months after the opening of Peace by Chocolate in 2016, wildfires swept through Fort McMurray in Alberta in Canada’s mid-west. The Hadhads were watching the news as Canadians lost everything as their homes burned down, forcing them to seek refuge at Canadian Red Cross shelters.

    “Canadians always pull together, so we felt a responsibility to give back to the people who welcomed us with such warmth and kindness,” Mr Hadhad said, explaining that they launched a fundraising campaign, donating profits from Peace for Chocolate to help aid organizations.

    In September of that year, at the UN Leaders’ Summit on Refugees in New York, Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau highlighted the Hadhad’s story and their contribution to the relief efforts in their new country just months after their arrival.

    Kindness pays off

    Since then, the Hadhad’s company has raised more than $655,000 to support relief projects for across Canada alongside 11 partnership agreements with such organizations as the Canadian Red Cross.

    “Thanks to the support of the Antigonish community and the country as a whole, we have been able to grow our company and have paid tens of millions in taxes to back into the Canadian economy,” Mr. Hadhad said.

    “Kindness pays off, and the best investment you can make is to be kind to others.”

    Peace by Chocolate is now the third largest employer in Antigonish, home to the company headquarters and factory. With the senior Mr. Hadhad as president and his son, Tareq, the CEO, the company has a branch in Halifax, the provincial capital, and its products are sold in more than a thousand stores across Canada.

    Mr. Hadhad said the Peace by Chocolate website has become the largest e-commerce platform in Canada’s Atlantic region, and it aspires to become the largest chocolate exporter in the country and to open branches in the United States, Japan and the Middle East.

    Peace by Chocolate

    Tareq and his father Isam meet Prime Minister Justin Trudeau for the first time.

    Refugee to employer

    Despite the major differences that separate the family from their new community, what brought them together was “much stronger”, and they never felt like outcasts at any time or that they are obstacles to becoming part of that community.

    Mr. Hadhad said any successful refugee or migration story has two sides. There is, of course, a major role for the host community to play, but “the main responsibility lies primarily with the migrant or refugee”.

    “No one is going to knock on your door and ask about your story or your ambitions for the future. The first step always comes from the migrant or refugee themselves to tell their story,” he said.

    That is exactly what he did. He spoke with the local newspaper shortly after arriving and made the front page. The word spread. The Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC) sent a correspondent to visit the Hadhad’s every month to follow up on their integration.

    A sense of belonging

    In addition to the warm welcome from Canadians themselves, stability was a major factor in the family’s integration, with the Hadhads granted permanent residency upon arrival.

    In many countries, as a refugee, “you can’t think beyond an hour, a week or a month because your situation is always temporary,” Mr. Hadhad explained.

    “What Canada also gave us was ambition for sustainability,” he said. “You can think 10 or 20 years into the future or even for the rest of your life. You can build projects and plan. Canada gave us a sense of belonging and citizenship even before we became Canadian citizens.”

    He said he has the utmost respect for “the Canadian brand” and what it stands for.

    “Regardless of what politicians, individuals or economists do, I am proud to belong to this great country and to be a Canadian citizen today.”

    UNHCR/Darren Calabrese

    Tareq Haddad with his family and friends in Halifax, Nova Scotia, for his citizenship ceremony in January 2020.

    ‘More than a miracle’

    After more than 13 years of war, destruction and displacement, Mr. Hadhad described the fall of the Bashar al Assad regime as “more than a miracle” as many Syrians had lost hope of getting rid of the oppressive regime that had terrorised the country for more than 50 years.

    The future of Syria seems “very bright” to him, thanks to the efforts of its heroic people who refused to leave Syria and those who sought refuge in other communities around the world and built strong relationships there, he said.

    “My city, Damascus, is the oldest city in the world. It has survived much greater disasters than what happened to it in the past 50 years,” he said. “God willing, we are on the road to recovery, and I have a strong belief that the Syrian people will overcome all the difficulties of the war and build a country that we can all be proud of.”

    After 12 years in exile, he is now looking forward to visiting the country soon to meet those loved ones he left behind, including one of his sisters.

    Pride and duty to the homeland

    Supporting the Canadian community was a duty to pay back those that embraced the Hadhads in their hour of need, and now the family is focusing on its moral obligation to help their homeland.

    From working on licensing in the Middle East to be closer to collecting donations through Peace by Chocolate sales, the Hadhads aim to support relief organizations and those helping Syrian refugees return home. Efforts are also underway to connect the Syrian-Canadian community by presenting models of projects in Syria that it can support.

    “It is an honour for us to contribute to rebuilding it again and to support our Syrian people,” Mr. Hadhad said.

    Peace by Chocolate

    The Hadhad family and many supporters join them in the opening of their factory in Antigonish in 2017.

    Creating a happy ending

    In a message to people facing hardship and forced expulsion, Mr. Hadhad stressed that “believing in values, in oneself and in a bright future is very important, but what is more important is fighting despair in all its forms”.

    “I advise anyone anywhere around the world looking for an opportunity – if you don’t find it, create it yourself,” he said.

    “As long as we are able to continue our lives, we are able to create new opportunities for ourselves and our new communities. We must not forget to give back to the countries that opened their doors to us, and at the same time be proud of where we came from, because we are ultimately ambassadors for our culture, our countries, and our values.”

    Mr. Hadhad cited author Mary Robinson: “nobody can go back and start a new beginning, but anyone can start today and make a new ending.”

    MIL OSI United Nations News

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Minister acknowledges outgoing Director-General

    Source: New Zealand Government

    Health Minister Simeon Brown has today acknowledged the resignation of Director-General of Health and Chief Executive of the Ministry of Health, Dr Diana Sarfati, and thanked her for her service.

    “Diana was appointed in November 2022, having acted in the role from July 2022. She played a key role as the government’s chief health advisor and steward of New Zealand’s public health system during the health system reforms. 

    “Prior to this, Diana was National Director of Cancer at the Ministry of Health where she oversaw the implementation of the Cancer Control Agency, before being appointed its Chief Executive and National Director.

    “Diana has had a long, distinguished career in health as a public health physician, cancer epidemiologist, and health services researcher.

    “An experienced and respected leader, Diana has led the Ministry of Health during a challenging time as the last government’s reforms were being implemented.

    “I acknowledge Diana’s decision to step down from the role and thank her for her commitment to ensuring the health system delivers for New Zealanders.

    “I wish her all the very best for the future,” Mr Brown says.

    MIL OSI New Zealand News