Category: Politics

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Unregistered boats on River Thames: fines and costs total £18,000

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    Clear warning to unregistered boat owners on the Thames as owners failed to register their boats despite warnings. More to face court in coming months

    Lindum, owned by Battersea boater Drystan Brod

    Staines magistrates’ court had a busy day on 22 October as 14 owners were sentenced to pay more than £18,000 for failing to register their boats for use on the River Thames.

    Environment Agency enforcement officers discovered these vessels during spot checks in December 2023 at Penton Hook Marina in Surrey. The inspection showed unacceptably high levels of registration evasion with a quarter of the boats in the marina, around 125 vessels, failing to have been registered. Every boat-owner was traced and given ample warning and opportunity to register their boats correctly.

    The court was told that all owners had skipped the annual registration fee, determined by the length and width of the boat. A couple of them had skipped it twice. Duncan Heyward and Tony Davies, both of Chertsey, were found guilty of owning two unregistered vessels and had to pay compensation accordingly.

    The highest charges were issued to Drystan Brod of Battersea for his boat, Lindum – more than £2300 including costs, fines, compensation and victim surcharge. Full details of all fines below.

    Colin Chiverton, environment manager for Surrey at the Environment Agency, said:

    This was a great day for the majority of Thames boat-owners who register their vessel with us every year. Just like us, they’re fed up with seeing this unlawful behaviour take place on the river every year. We’re pleased with this outcome, and it sends a clear warning to all unregistered boat owners – it’s just not worth the risk.

    At the end of November, we have another day in court with a further 14 owners facing the music. So, if you have an unregistered boat on the Thames, you should know that our enforcement teams are still out in October, patrolling the river and checking for valid registrations.

    Renewal invitation letters for 2025 registrations on the River Thames are to be sent in November to everyone that registered their boat this year and owners are encouraged to register early to ensure their boats are compliant by 1 January, when the new season starts. The Environment Agency’s approach to non-registration on the Thames has changed – boat-owners are given ample opportunity to register their boat. However, once a summons has been issued, it won’t stop court proceedings, even if the boat owner subsequently pays their registration fee.

    Similar to excise duty for road vehicles, boat registration fees allow the Environment Agency to manage and maintain more than 600 miles of inland waterways across England, keeping them open and safe for thousands of boaters to enjoy.

    Background:

    Owners of powered or non-powered boats, including paddleboards, must register their boats annually with the Environment Agency for use on the non-tidal River Thames.

    Boat registration on the Thames starts on 1 January every year. Any boats found on the water after that date, without having registered, may be liable to a fine.

    In mid-September 2024 during a river wide census, Environment Agency officers recorded the locations of 10,890 boats on the river.

    Boats can be registered by calling 03708 506 506 or going to River Thames: boat registration and application forms – GOV.UK (www.gov.uk)

    Offender/age/address/boat[s]/pleas/compensation order/costs/victim surcharge/fine

    Des Higgins, 64, of Graham Court, Northolt, Middlesex, PRINCESS BURFORD. Pleaded not guilty then changed plea at court to guilty. £803.60. £250. £80. £120.

    Stephen Hale, 54, of Bridge Court, Chertsey, Surrey. LADY RUTH. Found guilty in absence. £994.14. £275. £88. £220.

    Drystan Brod, 50, of Birley Street, Battersea, London. LINDUM. Found guilty in absence. £1724.00. £275. £88. £220.

    Duncan Hayward, 40, of Hill Rise, Richmond, Surrey. MAVERICK III/TT MAVERICK III. Found guilty in absence – 2 offences. £1065.15/£23.20. £275/nil. £24/nil. £60/NSP

    Mark Geeson, 53, of Gaston Way, Shepperton, Middlesex. PORTIA. Found guilty in absence. £970.47. £275. £88. £220

    Tony Davies, 70, of St Annes Road, Chertsey, Surrey. BULTRUG/REDWATCH. Pleaded guilty at court – 2 offences. £923.13/£887.64. £250/nil. Nil/nil. No separate penalty/NSP.

    Andrew Graham, 53,  of Wellington Terrace, Basingstoke, Hampshire. BUSTAROON. Found guilty in absence. £757.44. £275. £88. £220.

    Hugo Handford, of Chichester Road, West Wittering, West Sussex. DAJA. Found guilty in absence. £331.00. £275. £88. £220.

    Tim Cartwright, 64, of Elder Road, Bisley, Surrey. CHARLIE BEN. Found guilty in absence. £678.44. £275. £88. £220.

    Brian Harvey, 60, of Queens Road, Hersham, Surrey. SEA DANCER. Found guilty in absence. £520.74. £275. £88. £220.

    Scott Cole, 52, of Grafton Road, Acton, London. ALKYON. Found guilty in absence. £284.04. £275. £88. £220.

    Lee Davis, 49, of Meadow View, Chertsey, Surrey. TUBS. Found guilty in absence. £473.40. £275. £88. £220.

    Maciej Firla-Cuchra, 49, of The Broadway, Laleham, Surrey. JEWNA. Found guilty in absence. £426.06. £275. £88. £220.

    David Harding, 73, of Easton, Wells, Somerset. Le BATEAU DE BOIS. Pleaded not guilty, then changed plea at court to guilty. £736.02. £275. Nil. NSP.

    Contact us:

    Journalists only: 0800 141 2743 or communications_se@environment-agency.gov.uk.

    Updates to this page

    Published 28 October 2024

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI Russia: SUM will act as a partner of the International Forum “World Quality Day – 2024”

    Translation. Region: Russian Federation –

    Source: State University of Management – Official website of the State –

    From November 11 to 15, the International Forum “World Quality Day 2024” will be held, with the State University of Management as a partner.

    The International Forum “World Quality Day” will be held for the fifth time. The event is held as part of the Quality Week, dedicated to World Quality Day, which this year falls on November 14.

    The forum will be held in two formats – in-person and hybrid. Offline events are planned in Moscow, St. Petersburg, Ufa, Sochi. Everyone who registers on the forum website will be able to watch the online broadcast of the sessions, and later the recording.

    In 2023, 60 sessions were held as part of the business program. They were attended by 437 speakers from 16 countries. The broadcast of the business program was watched by over 3 million people from 65 countries.

    As in previous years, the business program will feature leading experts from various sectors of the economy, representatives of federal and regional authorities, businesses and public organizations. Participants will exchange experiences in improving quality standards, implementing innovative management methods and sustainable development practices, and discuss quality infrastructure and industry development vectors.

    Traditionally, the main event of the forum will be the plenary session “Development Horizons” with the participation of representatives of government bodies. The participation of the First Deputy Chairman of the Government of the Russian Federation Denis Manturov, the Minister of Industry and Trade of the Russian Federation Anton Alikhanov, the Minister of Health of the Russian Federation Mikhail Murashko, the State Secretary – Deputy Minister of Economic Development of the Russian Federation Alexey Khersontsev and others is expected. The experts will discuss key tasks and update the priorities that the state faces until the end of the decade and beyond.

    The business program will include sessions on business excellence, food safety, tourism, retail, HR, finance, business and much more. You can view the full program and register for events on the official forum website.

    Two sessions of the business program will be held at the State University of Management: – November 14, 12:00-13:30 – Session “New Horizons for the Development of the Labor Market in the Russian Federation”; – November 14, 14:00-15:30 – Session “Assessment of Management Quality: Approaches, Methods, Tools, Personnel”.

    The forum is held by the Ministry of Industry and Trade of Russia, the Ministry of Economic Development of Russia, Roskachestvo, Rosstandart and Rosaccreditation with the support of the Chamber of Commerce and Industry of the Russian Federation and other organizations.

    The Forum partners are the Russian Society “Knowledge”, PAO Promsvyazbank (PSB), the State University of Management, Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, ROSBIOTECH, the Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, RUDN University and other universities and organizations.

    Subscribe to the tg channel “Our State University” Announcement date: 10/28/2024

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI: NANO Nuclear Energy Announces Closing of Upsized $36 Million Underwritten Offering

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Additional capital following public offerings in May and July 2024 to fund technology advancements and growth opportunities

    New York, N.Y., Oct. 28, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — NANO Nuclear Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: NNE) (“NANO Nuclear”), a leading vertically integrated advanced nuclear energy and technology company developing portable clean nuclear energy solutions, today announced that it has closed its previously announced upsized $36 million firm commitment, registered underwritten public offering.

    In the offering, NANO Nuclear sold 2,117,646 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase 1,217,646 shares of common stock at $17.00 per share and associated warrant, less underwriting discounts and expenses. Such warrants include warrants to purchase 158,823 shares of common stock which were purchased by the underwriter at closing pursuant to a partial exercise of its offering over-allotment option. The underwriter retains an option through November 22, 2024, to purchase an additional 317,646 shares of common stock. The warrants are exercisable immediately, have a term of five years, and have an exercise price of $17.00 per share. The warrants will not trade on any market.

    This offering follows NANO Nuclear’s initial public offering which closed on May 10, 2024, and its underwritten follow-on offering which closed on July 15, 2024, from which NANO Nuclear received total gross proceeds of over $30 million.

    NANO Nuclear expects its net proceeds from the offering, after underwriting commissions and offering expenses, will be approximately $32.6 million. NANO Nuclear intends to use the net proceeds from this offering for (i) research and development of its products and technologies, including its ‘ZEUS’ and ‘ODIN’ microreactors and nuclear fuel transportation design optimization, fuel facility investigations and development, test work and scoping studies, and other technology research and development; (ii) marketing, promotion and business development activities; and (iii) regulatory compliance, intellectual property protection, hiring additional employees, retaining additional contractors and building out NANO Nuclear’s new Nuclear Technology Headquarters in Oak Ridge, Tennessee. NANO Nuclear will also use the proceeds for general working capital and may also use a portion of the net proceeds to acquire, license and invest in complementary products, technologies, or additional businesses, although NANO Nuclear currently has no agreements or commitments with respect to any such transaction.

    “We have worked extremely hard to establish NANO Nuclear as one of the leaders in the U.S. advanced nuclear energy market. It is incredibly gratifying to see the continued support from our current shareholder base as well as new fundamental and institutional investors in this oversubscribed financing round, which will fuel our efforts to further develop and refine our proprietary technologies,” said Jay Yu, Founder and Chairman of NANO Nuclear Energy. “With over $65 million raised in under 6 months as a public company, we are positioned to drive shareholder value and realize our vision of becoming a leading, diversified, and vertically integrated nuclear energy company.”

    The Benchmark Company, LLC acted as the sole book-running representative for the offering. Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLP acted as counsel to NANO Nuclear. Lucosky Brookman LLP acted as counsel to The Benchmark Company. Withum Smith+Brown PC are NANO Nuclear’s registered independent auditors.

    Registration statements relating to this public offering were filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and declared. This registration statement can be obtained by visiting the SEC website at www.sec.gov. Please see such registration statement for additional information regarding NANO Nuclear.

    This press release shall not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy these securities, nor shall there be any sale of these securities in any state or jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful prior to registration or qualification under the securities laws of any such state or jurisdiction.

    About NANO Nuclear Energy Inc.

    NANO Nuclear Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: NNE) is an advanced technology-driven nuclear energy company seeking to become a commercially focused, diversified, and vertically integrated company across four business lines: (i) cutting edge portable microreactor technology, (ii) nuclear fuel fabrication, (iii) nuclear fuel transportation and (iv) nuclear industry consulting services. NANO Nuclear believes it is the first portable nuclear microreactor company to be listed publicly in the U.S.

    Led by a world-class nuclear engineering team, NANO Nuclear’s products in technical development are “ZEUS”, a solid core battery reactor, and “ODIN”, a low-pressure coolant reactor, each representing advanced developments in clean energy solutions that are portable, on-demand capable, advanced nuclear microreactors.

    Advanced Fuel Transportation Inc. (AFT), a NANO Nuclear subsidiary, is led by former executives from the largest transportation company in the world aiming to build a North American transportation company that will provide commercial quantities of HALEU fuel to small modular reactors, microreactor companies, national laboratories, military, and DOE programs. Through NANO Nuclear, AFT is the exclusive licensee of a patented high-capacity HALEU fuel transportation basket developed by three major U.S. national nuclear laboratories and funded by the Department of Energy. Assuming development and commercialization, AFT is expected to form part of the only vertically integrated nuclear fuel business of its kind in North America.

    HALEU Energy Fuel Inc. (HEF), a NANO Nuclear subsidiary, is focusing on the future development of a domestic source for a High-Assay, Low-Enriched Uranium (HALEU) fuel fabrication pipeline for NANO Nuclear’s own microreactors as well as the broader advanced nuclear reactor industry.

    NANO Nuclear Space Inc. (NNS), a NANO Nuclear subsidiary, is exploring the potential commercial applications of NANO Nuclear’s developing micronuclear reactor technology in space. NNS is focusing on applications such as power systems for extraterrestrial projects and human sustaining environments, and potentially propulsion technology for long haul space missions. NNS’ initial focus will be on cis-lunar applications, referring to uses in the space region extending from Earth to the area surrounding the Moon’s surface.

    For further information, please contact:

    Email: IR@NANONuclearEnergy.com
    Business Tel: (212) 634-9206

    Cautionary Note Regarding Forward Looking Statements

    This news release and statements of NANO Nuclear’s management in connection with this news release or related events contain or may contain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. In this context, forward-looking statements mean statements (including statements related to the public offering and the proposed use of proceeds from such offering, as described herein) related to future events, which may impact our expected future business and financial performance, and often contain words such as “seek,” “expects”, “anticipates”, “intends”, “plans”, “believes”, “potential”, “will”, “should”, “could”, “would” or “may” and other words of similar meaning. These forward-looking statements are based on information available to us as of the date of this news release and represent management’s current views and assumptions. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance, events or results and involve significant known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, some of which may be beyond our control. Readers are cautioned that actual results may differ materially and adversely from the results implied in forward-looking statements. For NANO Nuclear, particular risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual future results to differ materially from those expressed in our forward-looking statements include but are not limited to the following: (i) risks related to our U.S. Department of Energy (“DOE”) or related state nuclear fuel licensing submissions, (ii) risks related the development of new or advanced technology, including difficulties with design and testing, cost overruns, regulatory delays and the development of competitive technology, (iii) our ability to obtain contracts and funding to be able to continue operations, (iv) risks related to uncertainty regarding our ability to technologically develop and commercially deploy a competitive advanced nuclear reactor or other technology in the timelines we anticipate, if ever, (v) risks related to the impact of government regulation and policies including by the DOE and the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, including those associated with the recently enacted ADVANCE Act, and (vi) similar risks and uncertainties associated with the business of a start-up business operating a highly regulated industry. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which apply only as of the date of this news release. These factors may not constitute all of the factors that could cause actual results to differ from those discussed in any forward-looking statement, and the Company therefore encourages investors to review other factors that may affect future results in the Company’s filings with the SEC, which are available for review at www.sec.gov and at https://ir.nanonuclearenergy.com/financial-information/sec-filings. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which apply only as of the date of this news release, and forward-looking statements should not be relied upon as a predictor of actual results. We do not undertake to update our forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances that may arise after the date of this news release, except as required by law.

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI: Franklin Electric Declares Quarterly Dividend of $0.25 Per Share

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    FORT WAYNE, Ind., Oct. 28, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Franklin Electric Co., Inc. (NASDAQ: FELE) announced today that its Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.25 per share payable November 21, 2024, to shareholders of record on November 7, 2024.

    About Franklin Electric
    Franklin Electric is a global leader in the production and marketing of systems and components for the movement of water and energy. Recognized as a technical leader in its products and services, Franklin Electric serves customers around the world in residential, commercial, agricultural, industrial, municipal, and fueling applications. Franklin Electric is proud to be named in Newsweek’s lists of America’s Most Responsible Companies and Most Trustworthy Companies for 2023 and America’s Climate Leaders 2023 by USA Today.

    “Safe Harbor” Statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Any forward-looking statements contained herein, including those relating to market conditions or the Company’s financial results, costs, expenses or expense reductions, profit margins, inventory levels, foreign currency translation rates, liquidity expectations, business goals and sales growth, involve risks and uncertainties, including but not limited to, risks and uncertainties with respect to general economic and currency conditions, various conditions specific to the Company’s business and industry, weather conditions, new housing starts, market demand, competitive factors, changes in distribution channels, supply constraints, effect of price increases, raw material costs, technology factors, integration of acquisitions, litigation, government and regulatory actions, the Company’s accounting policies, future trends, epidemics and pandemics, and other risks which are detailed in the Company’s Securities and Exchange Commission filings, included in Item 1A of Part I of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2023, Exhibit 99.1 attached thereto and in Item 1A of Part II of the Company’s Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q. These risks and uncertainties may cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated by the forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements made herein are based on information currently available, and the Company assumes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements.

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI: SWA Lithium and Koch Technology Solutions Sign License for First Commercial DLE Project in North America

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    EL DORADO, Ark., Oct. 28, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — SWA Lithium, the Joint Venture between Standard Lithium and Equinor which is developing the South West Arkansas Project (“SWA” or the “Project”), is pleased to announce that it has entered into a license agreement with Koch Technology Solutions LLC (“KTS”) to deploy and use KTS’ Li-ProTM Lithium Selective Sorption (“Li-Pro LSS”) technology at the JV’s commercial plant for the SWA Phase 1 Project.

    The license agreement allows the JV to utilize KTS’ technology for the lifetime of the first phase of the Project, with an option for utilization in subsequent phases of the Project. Considerations and benefits of the license agreement include:

    • Rights to use the Li-Pro LSS technology for subsequent phases of the JV’s SWA Project;
    • Certain technology performance guarantees for lithium recovery, contaminant rejection and water use;
      • Lithium recovery ≥ 95.00%
      • Impurity rejection Calcium, Sodium, Potassium & Magnesium ≥ 99%
    • Technical support from KTS to fully integrate the Li-Pro LSS technology into overall process plant design;
    • Continued exclusive joint development of the technology in the Smackover Formation;
    • Technical support from KTS during commissioning and startup;
    • License payment phased over several milestones; and
    • Continued collaboration and technology refinement between SWA Lithium and KTS.

    Standard Lithium’s Director, President & COO, Dr. Andy Robinson commented: “Signing this license agreement is the culmination of over two years of close work with the KTS team to refine the direct lithium extraction (‘DLE’) technology and integrate it into the JV’s flowsheet. The Li-Pro LSS technology is now sufficiently scaled-up, tested and derisked, so not only is the JV comfortable committing to its use at commercial scale, but KTS is also able to offer performance guarantees for its commercial deployment. We view this as a significant derisking event for the Project, and it points to the successful ongoing partnership with the KTS team.

    Garrett Krall, Business Leader for Koch Technology Solutions, said: “This license agreement for use of our Li-Pro LSS technology is another key milestone in the development of DLE as a commercially viable, economic and environmentally responsible solution to deliver against future lithium demand.”

    UPDATED PERFORMANCE OF COMMERCIAL-SCALE DLE COLUMN

    Standard Lithium is also pleased to announce the continued successful operation of the commercial-scale DLE column at its wholly-owned Demonstration Plant (“Demo Plant”) near El Dorado, Arkansas. The Company installed a commercial-scale DLE column in late March 2024 and has been operating the column continuously. The column is a Li-Pro LSS unit, supplied by KTS and identical to those currently being integrated into the front-end engineering and design (FEED) study for the SWA Project.

    Since commissioning, the column has exceeded the targeted design parameters for lithium recovery and rejection of impurities. Key technical highlights of the commercial-scale DLE column are provided below:

    • Lithium recovery efficiency of 95.4%: During a four-month continuous operating period (1st April to 31st July 2024), the Li-Pro LSS process achieved an average lithium recovery (i.e. after loading and elution) of 95.4% from the 90 gallons per minute (gpm) incoming brine flow (the average incoming brine contained 183 mg/L lithium during the same period).
    • Excellent contamination rejection rate: During the same period, the DLE process rejected, on average;
      • Sodium – 99.9%
      • Calcium – 99.6%
      • Magnesium – 99.2%
      • Potassium – 99.7%
      • Boron – 95.4%
        High and consistent contaminant rejection at the DLE stage means that the eluate (the initial lithium chloride solution) is easier and cheaper to further refine and concentrate using tested and proven steps to make a concentrated and purified lithium chloride solution. This solution can then be converted to a battery quality carbonate, as has been demonstrated multiple times and at several different scales, both at the Demo Plant and off-site with various third-party vendors.
    • Nearly 10,000 operational cycles for the Li-Pro LSS technology: The commercial-scale Li-Pro LSS column has completed over 725 operational cycles, and the Li-Pro LSS technology has completed over 9,740 operational cycles at the Demo Plant (as of early October 2024).
    • Over 24 million gallons of brine processed: As of the end of September 2024, the Demo Plant had processed 24,446,306 gallons (92,539,335 litres) of Smackover brine, produced directly from the formation and reinjected continuously back into the same formation.

    Figure 1 – Side elevation of operators working on the commercial-scale DLE column at Standard Lithium’s Demonstration Plant near El Dorado, Arkansas.

    About Standard Lithium Ltd.

    Standard Lithium is a leading near-commercial lithium development company focused on the sustainable development of a portfolio of large, high-grade lithium-brine properties in the United States. The Company prioritizes projects characterized by the highest quality resources, robust infrastructure, skilled labor, and streamlined permitting. Standard Lithium aims to achieve sustainable, commercial-scale lithium production via the application of a scalable and fully integrated Direct Lithium Extraction (“DLE”) and purification process. The Company’s flagship projects are located in the Smackover Formation, a world-class lithium brine asset, focused in Arkansas and Texas. In partnership with global energy leader Equinor ASA, Standard Lithium is advancing the South West Arkansas project, a greenfield project located in southern Arkansas, and actively exploring promising lithium brine prospects in East Texas. Additionally, the Company is advancing the Phase 1A project in partnership with LANXESS Corporation, a brownfield development project located in southern Arkansas. Standard Lithium also holds an interest in certain mineral leases in the Mojave Desert in San Bernardino County, California.

    Standard Lithium trades on both the TSX Venture Exchange and the NYSE American under the symbol “SLI”; and on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange under the symbol “S5L”. Please visit the Company’s website at www.standardlithium.com.

    About Equinor

    Equinor is an international energy company committed to long-term value creation in a low-carbon future. Our purpose is to turn natural resources into energy for people and progress for society. Equinor’s portfolio of projects encompasses oil and gas, renewables and low-carbon solutions, with an ambition of becoming a net-zero energy company by 2050. Headquartered in Stavanger (Norway), Equinor is the leading operator on the Norwegian continental shelf. We are present in around 30 countries worldwide.

    About Koch Technology Solutions (KTS)

    Koch Technology Solutions is the technology licensing business of Koch Engineered Solutions (KES). KTS creates value for its customers across a growing portfolio of technologies including direct lithium extraction, the polyester value chain, and 1,4-Butananediol plus its derivates. KTS combines its exclusive technologies, expertise, and capabilities with those of other KES companies to provide overall solutions to optimize customer’s capital investments and existing manufacturing assets.

    Qualified Person

    Marek Dworzanowski, EUR ING, CEng, HonFSAIMM, FIMMM, a qualified person as defined by National Instrument 43 -101 – Technical Report Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects, and a Consulting Metallurgical Engineer who is independent of the Company, has reviewed and approved the relevant scientific and technical information in this news release.

    Twitter: @standardlithium
    LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/standard-lithium/

    Neither the TSXV nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in policies of the TSXV) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release. This news release may contain certain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and “forward looking information” within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities laws. When used in this news release, the words “anticipate”, “believe”, “estimate”, “expect”, “target, “plan”, “forecast”, “may”, “schedule” and other similar words or expressions identify forward-looking statements or information. These forward-looking statements or information may relate to intended development timelines, future prices of commodities, accuracy of mineral or resource exploration activity, reserves or resources, continued operation of the LSS column, regulatory or government requirements or approvals, the reliability of third party information, the continued accuracy of current contaminant rejection rates, continued access to mineral properties or infrastructure, fluctuations in the market for lithium and its derivatives, changes in exploration costs and government regulation in Canada and the United States, and other factors or information. Such statements represent the Company’s current views with respect to future events and are necessarily based upon a number of assumptions and estimates that, while considered reasonable by the Company, are inherently subject to significant business, economic, competitive, political and social risks, contingencies and uncertainties. Many factors, both known and unknown, could cause results, performance or achievements to be materially different from the results, performance or achievements that are or may be expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. The Company does not intend, and does not assume any obligation, to update these forward-looking statements or information to reflect changes in assumptions or changes in circumstances or any other events affecting such statements and information other than as required by applicable laws, rules and regulations.

    A photo accompanying this announcement is available at https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/0c4dea63-0750-44b2-bea8-e287cc9be29c

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-Evening Report: Echoes of a Lost Gaza – Al Jazeera documentary on a brutal war

    Pacific Media Watch

    Mariam Shahin has been making films about Gaza for more than 30 years.

    She has also made many documentaries and short films for Al Jazeera English since it launched in 2006.

    When she moved to Gaza in 2005, she felt a powerful sense of optimism following the Israeli withdrawal.

    Mariam Shahin . . . revisiting the Gaza people and lives the film maker has met over the years. Image: MS

    But by 2009, war had badly damaged its infrastructure, neighbourhoods, businesses and communities — and that optimism had evaporated.

    Now, in the wake of the even more destructive war that began on 7 October 2023, Shahin seeks out the people she has met in Gaza over the years.

    She reflects on the wasted potential and devastated lives after 16 years of blockade and a year of one of the most destructive wars in Middle East history.


    Echoes of a Lost Gaza: 2005-2024.     Video: Al Jazeera

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-OSI Africa: Somaliland elections: what’s at stake for independence, stability and shifting power dynamics in the Horn of Africa

    Source: The Conversation – Africa – By Brendon J. Cannon, Associate Professor, Khalifa University

    Somaliland is due to hold a presidential election on 13 November 2024.

    The results of the election will be important for two main reasons. First, what the leadership outcome will mean for Somaliland’s democratic credentials. Second, it will have implications for Somaliland’s push for recognition as an independent state.

    Thirty-three years ago, Somaliland declared its unilateral withdrawal from the Somali Union. It is an independent state in reality but unrecognised in law. Like other unrecognised states such as Taiwan, it doesn’t fly a flag at the United Nations in New York. It also suffers from a lack of access to global financing, and humanitarian and development aid, most of which must come via Mogadishu.

    Somaliland’s determination to achieve recognition was evident in January 2024 when it signed an agreement with neighbouring Ethiopia. Under this deal, Ethiopia would get access to the sea via a 19km strip of coastline, possibly near the port of Berbera (though three sites have been identified), and Addis Ababa would recognise Somaliland’s statehood. The agreement, which has yet to be ratified, was met with a storm of protests, including from Somalia.

    Somaliland is run by the ruling party, Kulmiye, which is led by Muse Bihi Abdi, Somaliland’s president since 2017. The party has been in power since 2010. The main opposition party is Waddani (also spelled Wadani), led by Abdirahman Mohamed Abdilahi (or Ciro/Irro).

    I have carried out a decade of research and fieldwork in Somaliland. In my view, this election carries weight in terms of Somaliland’s democratic health, as well as its prospects for peace and stability – within its borders and in the region.

    Somaliland’s democracy, like all democracies, relies on giving politicians and parties the chance to win elections. It is the voters who will decide who gets to run Somaliland next, and they face a clear choice between Kulmiye and Waddani.

    Political landscape

    Somaliland’s 2024 presidential election will be a test of its democratic institutions and a critical moment in its quest for independence.

    Kulmiye can point to milestones on the road to Somaliland’s recognition. It was in power when Somaliland and Taiwan (Republic of China) recognised one another and swapped diplomats.

    The party can also claim success for a strategy to get support from western states for Somaliland’s formal recognition. This includes the staffing and funding of Somaliland’s overseas missions in London, Washington DC and Dubai, among others. These act as non-accredited embassies for the country.

    Their work resulted in a non-official visit to Washington, DC by Bihi in 2022. The same year, a UK parliamentary delegation visited Hargeisa.

    Somaliland and Ethiopia also reached their agreement in January 2024. This is the closest Somaliland has come to gaining official recognition from another state.


    Read more: Somaliland has been pursuing independence for 33 years. Expert explains the impact of the latest deal with Ethiopia


    Like the ruling party, the opposition party Waddani fully supports the agreement with Ethiopia. It sees recognition from Somaliland’s huge neighbour – which also happens to host the headquarters of the African Union – as a first step to gaining official recognition.

    However, based on my recent interviews with a Waddani official, the party is likely to adopt a broader approach if it wins the upcoming election. Instead of focusing solely on western states like the US and the UK, Waddani plans to approach African and global south states, such as Senegal and Kenya, for support.

    This potential shift reflects an understanding that both regional and global dynamics are changing.

    Waddani’s broader diplomatic strategy is reinforced by its recent coalition with KAAH (the Somali acronym for Alliance for Equity and Development). KAAH is a young political association rather than a formal political party. Somaliland has a constitutional limit of three official parties.

    KAAH was formed, in part, by experienced politicians. In building a coalition, Waddani and KAAH hope to displace Somaliland’s current third party, the Justice and Welfare Party.

    KAAH’s support is partially based in Somaliland’s eastern region, which has experienced violent upheavals in recent years. This coalition promises to better incorporate the eastern regions and clans into the government should Waddani win.

    Regardless of the outcome of the election, one issue unites Somaliland’s political parties: the push for independence.

    Regional implications

    A peaceful election would reinforce Somaliland’s claim as a stable, democratic entity.

    Mogadishu should not expect any winds of change to blow from Hargeisa if Waddani wins. Three generations and counting have been raised in a de-facto independent Somaliland and they remember the violent dissolution from the Somali Union. This included the bombing of Hargeisa, the destruction of Berbera port and the displacement of thousands of people. Somalilanders largely support independence.

    Neither Waddani nor Kulmiye will be wishy-washy on this issue. And there will be forward movement on the Ethiopia-Somaliland agreement. This is likely to lead to increased tensions in the Horn region. As it is, Ethiopia and Somaliland are disturbed by the prospect of a resurgent Somalia supported by Egypt with arms and troops.


    Read more: Somaliland crisis: delayed elections and armed conflict threaten dream of statehood


    There won’t be a shooting war – Mogadishu still has far too many problems with al-Shabaab, clan infighting and a lack of resources and training. But history shows that states take extreme measures if they feel existentially threatened.

    Mogadishu’s stance is to retake Somaliland at all costs. And it has much of the world’s tacit support for its “one Somalia” policy. That makes Somaliland a textbook case of an existentially threatened state.

    Risks that lie ahead

    There are some risks of instability regardless of who wins the election.

    The Isaaq clan controls much of the political and economic landscape. This may intensify tensions, especially if minority clans feel sidelined. Waddani’s promise of inclusivity may appeal to marginalised groups, but clan-based grievances have grown over the past decade.

    There’s also the risk of unrest among Isaaq loyalists if power shifts too much. And allegations of electoral fraud or voter suppression could fuel protests.

    After 2022’s violent postponement due to election disputes, maintaining peace will require transparency, clan reconciliation and careful oversight to prevent renewed conflict.

    Despite these risks, Somaliland is again (better late than never) going to the polls. Regardless of who wins, this is good news for Somaliland and its ongoing push for independence recognition.

    – Somaliland elections: what’s at stake for independence, stability and shifting power dynamics in the Horn of Africa
    – https://theconversation.com/somaliland-elections-whats-at-stake-for-independence-stability-and-shifting-power-dynamics-in-the-horn-of-africa-242131

    MIL OSI Africa

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: More Scottish energy projects unlocked to deliver clean power

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    Consultation on proposed changes to improve the planning system for large energy projects in Scotland

    • UK and Scottish governments set out proposals to streamline the system for determining energy infrastructure consents in Scotland
    • consultation to reform outdated processes with the aim to cut delays and create a fairer system, in which communities can have their say from the outset
    • the move could help to unlock Scotland’s pipeline of energy projects, driving forward the UK’s clean power mission and energy independence

    The planning process for new clean energy infrastructure in Scotland will be improved under UK and Scottish government proposals to reform outdated legislation that can delay new projects being built. 

    In collaboration with the Scottish Government, the UK government has today (28 October) launched a consultation on proposed changes that will make the system for considering large energy projects in Scotland more efficient, while also ensuring that affected communities can have their say on proposals at the right time in the process. 

    Currently it can take up to four years to approve large electricity infrastructure projects in Scotland, such as power lines and onshore wind farms, under UK legislation that has been in place since 1989.

    This system can create uncertainty for investors and communities, which in turn can lead to higher costs being passed onto bill payers. In England and Wales, new large-scale electricity projects can take around half as long on average to be determined compared to Scotland, thanks to previous legislative reforms to streamline the process. 

    By making vital updates to the energy consents system in Scotland, the UK and Scottish governments aim to support the rollout of new clean energy projects while giving communities early and meaningful opportunities to be heard. The consultation proposes making it a requirement that communities and wider stakeholders are consulted at pre-application stage. 

    Energy Minister Michael Shanks said:  

    Scotland has huge potential to propel the UK towards our clean power by 2030 goal, with its natural resources, energy expertise and highly skilled workforce.  

    Together with the Scottish Government, we are modernising outdated bureaucratic processes to make sure Scotland is firmly open for business as we build the UK’s clean energy future.  

    This will help to accelerate new clean, homegrown energy – taking us a step closer to energy independence and protecting billpayers from the rollercoaster of volatile fossil fuel markets for good.

    Acting Cabinet Secretary for Net Zero and Energy Gillian Martin said:

    These long-awaited UK legislative reforms will help support Scotland realise our clean power ambitions, while providing investors with confidence that a more robust and efficient process is being applied.

    This will in turn support our net zero ambitions, enable economic growth and ensure our communities have an enhanced opportunity to be heard.

    Today’s announcement forms the next step in joint work from the two governments to cement Scotland’s role in making the UK a clean energy superpower.  

    It comes after the UK government confirmed Aberdeen as the headquarters for the publicly-owned company Great British Energy, that will own and invest in clean power projects across the UK. This month, Scottish and UK governments also signed an agreement to support clean energy supply chains and infrastructure, via new partnerships between Great British Energy and Scottish public bodies. 

    The proposed reforms aim to provide developers and communities with an updated system when submitting plans for large clean energy projects. The changes cover the entire process from pre-application to challenging decisions, tackling issues that have already been addressed in England and Wales under previous reforms. They include: 

    • Pre-application requirements: New standardised processes for both onshore and offshore developers to engage with local communities and stakeholders before submitting an application to the Scottish Government for new energy infrastructure. This will involve communities at an earlier stage and improve the quality and speed of applications, with new powers for the Scottish Government to reject any that do not meet requirements. The Scottish Government will also be able to charge fees for pre-application services, helping to deliver the new system effectively. 

    • Appealing decisions: Standardising the appeals process, with set criteria for challenging decisions on new energy infrastructure and a 6-week time limit in which objections can be raised. Currently challenges to large onshore projects must be brought by judicial review within three months, which can lead to lengthy delays.  

    • Public Inquiries: Reforming the public inquiry process which is automatically triggered when Planning Authorities raise objections to new energy infrastructure. These inquiries can take an average of 18 months and have cost the Scottish Government £1.9 million since 2021. Under the proposals, inquiry sessions will still be held where necessary, but other forms of decision making will also be deployed on a case-by-case basis guided by a specialist reporter.

    • Changes to planning consent: New powers to allow the Scottish Government to revoke, suspend or vary consents for energy infrastructure projects under specific circumstances. This will allow for necessary amends to be made, without the applicant having to restart the process. 

    • Necessary wayleaves: A new power for the Scottish Government to charge developers a fee for submitting wayleave applications to place overhead lines on private land. Similar fees are charged in England and Wales, and will help the Scottish Government to meet an expected increase in applications in the rollout of new clean energy projects.   

    Notes to editors:  

    The consultation, launched today, will run for 4 weeks until 26 November. Read more about the consultation.

    All decisions on new energy infrastructure projects in Scotland are devolved and applications over 50MW are made to the Scottish Government. The UK government is responsible for energy policy and the legislative framework (i.e. Electricity Act 1989) is reserved for the UK Parliament.  

    Changes to the Planning Act 2008 (such as Nationally Significant Infrastructure Projects) helped to speed up decision making on energy infrastructure projects in England and Wales. The proposed reforms in this consultation will update the approvals process for energy infrastructure in Scotland.  

    Following the consultation process, the UK government will bring forward the necessary legislation as soon as Parliamentary time allows.

    Updates to this page

    Published 28 October 2024

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: UK statement for 75th session of the UNHCR Executive Committee

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    UK general statement delivered by the UK’s Permanent Representative to the WTO and UN, Simon Manley, at the 75th session of the UNHCR Executive Committee, October 2024.

    Thank you, Chair, High Commissioner,

    Let me start by paying tribute to those humanitarians who have so tragically lost their lives in the past year – not least among them the UNHCR colleagues whom we have lost in the course of their duties in Lebanon. They have paid the ultimate price in their labour for peace and humanitarianism.

    We are deeply concerned about the escalating humanitarian situation in the Middle East and in Lebanon. The UK emphasises all parties’ obligation to comply with international humanitarian law and to ensure protection for civilians and civilian infrastructure. My government has been clear: the fighting must stop, the hostages must be freed, and there must be safe and free humanitarian access to those in need.

    Turning to the themes of the Executive Committee, as we face future uncertainties and ever-increasing global displacement, we need to continue to work in solidarity and in unity to find solutions. Forcibly displaced persons demand and expect that the international community takes responsibility.

    My government’s commitment to multilateralism and multilateral solutions is clear and deep-rooted. The UK will work hand-in-hand with UNHCR to respond to the growing list of protracted and emerging crises. We will tackle climate and nature emergencies and global development challenges together, by working for peace and promoting global economic development and growth to develop sustainable solutions. And we welcome the High Commissioner’s recent visit to London and the contact he has had with UK Ministers.

    But clearly, the situation in countries of origin needs international attention too. We need to address root causes and invest in early anticipatory action that builds resilience and independence. We need partnerships that promote local leadership. And we need to empower women and girls.

    Where needs arise, UNHCR must continue to provide protection for the most vulnerable. But clearly, more predictable and more sustainable support is needed so that increasingly stretched resources can be used more efficiently to keep pace with rising needs. UNHCR’s ongoing commitment to reform, efficiencies and effectiveness is an important part of this.

    The UK is committed to seeking sustainable solutions together. Not just because inclusion in national systems is the right thing to do, but also because it is the smart thing to do. And we support national ownership and the leadership of hosting countries, who I want to recognize here for their generosity, where this is in refugees’ best interests.

    This is why, at last year’s Global Refugee Forum, the UK highlighted the need to look beyond traditional humanitarian partnerships to galvanize joint sustainable action. And we have been working hard with our partners over the last ten months to put those commitments into action.

    We must be led by the needs of displaced people wherever and whenever we find them. But I want to point to two specific crises which demand our attention. Firstly, Russia’s brutal invasion of Ukraine in flagrant breach of the UN Charter. This year, the UK provided £100 million in humanitarian assistance and like my Czech colleague I want to pay tribute to the British people who have extended sanctuary to almost 300,000 Ukrainians since the start of the invasion.

    And Sudan which is perhaps the world’s most severe humanitarian crisis with almost 25 million people in need of assistance. Thank you, High Commissioner, for speaking out so clearly about the scale and horror of the conflict. We have provided almost £100m in assistance for Sudan this year.

    And finally, on statelessness, we are grateful to UNHCR for its leadership of the I Belong campaign. The achievements are a strong foundation on which to launch the Global Alliance, which the UK is honoured to join. We know statelessness can be ended, and we look forward to working with others on this shared mission.

    I’ll end by reiterate the UK’s gratitude to all UNHCR staff who tirelessly provide assistance to those who need it, so often in such difficult and dangerous circumstances. Let us, through the Executive Committee, show them our sustained support.

    Thank you.

    Updates to this page

    Published 28 October 2024

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: New Coastguard station is ‘great news for both the team and the island’

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    After around 40 years in the same station, a coastguard rescue team on the Isle of Wight has a new home.

    Needles Coastguard Rescue Team standing outside their new station

    Needles Coastguard Rescue Team is now operating from its new station at Golden Hill Fort in the Freshwater area, offering a spacious, modern and well-equipped space to prepare for search and rescue missions.

    With a dedicated training room and washing and drying facilities, and located in the heart of the community, the team of 11 volunteers will be even more ready to respond to those in need.

    Senior Coastal Operations Officer Andrew Woodford said:

    This is great news for both the team and the island, as we are now in a much better place to respond to call outs and undertake training activities.

    The station is future-proof so it will be there for officers for years to come, it looks the part, and has all the facilities we need in a much more suitable space.

    A fit-for-purpose station is such an important part of coastguard training and response, so this is a brilliant addition to the service which will have clear benefits.

    After 12 months of planning and costing more than £200,000, the building and fit-out took around three months to complete, with the final touches added in October, marking its operational status.

    An official opening ceremony for the new station will take place later this year.

    Press office

    Email public.relations@mcga.gov.uk

    Press enquiries (Monday to Friday, 9am-5pm) 0203 817 2222

    Outside these hours or on bank holidays and weekends, for media enquiries ONLY, please send an email outlining your query and putting #Urgent in the subject title.

    Updates to this page

    Published 28 October 2024

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI: Norwood Financial Corp Announces Third Quarter 2024 Results

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Quarterly Highlights:

    • Net interest margin increased 19 basis points vs. the prior quarter and 7 basis points over the prior year.
    • Loans grew at an 8% annualized rate during the 3rd quarter.
    • Capital continues to improve as the negative mark-to-market effect lessens 42% since last year.

    HONESDALE, Pa., Oct. 28, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Norwood Financial Corp (Nasdaq Global Market-NWFL) and its subsidiary, Wayne Bank, announced earnings for the three months ended September 30, 2024 of $3.8 million, which was $275 thousand lower than the same three-month period of last year. Net interest income was up by $892 thousand which was offset by increases in operating expense and the provision for credit losses. Earnings per share (fully diluted) were $0.48 in the three months ended September 30, 2024, compared to $0.51 in the same period of last year. The annualized return on average assets for the three months ended September 30, 2024, was 0.68%, while the annualized return on average tangible equity was 9.58%.

    Net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2024, was $12.5 million, which is $3.9 million lower than the same nine-month period of 2023, due to a decrease in net interest income, an increase in the provision for credit losses, and an increase in operating expenses, partially offset by an increase in total other income. Earnings per share (fully diluted) for the nine months ended September 30, 2024, were $1.55, compared to $2.03 for the nine months ended September 30, 2023. The annualized return on average assets for the nine months ended September 30, 2024 was 0.75%. The annualized return on average tangible equity for the nine months ended September 30, 2024 was 10.82%.

    Total assets as of September 30, 2024 were $2.280 billion, compared to $2.180 billion at September 30, 2023. At September 30, 2024, loans receivable were $1.675 billion, total deposits were $1.855 billion and stockholders’ equity was $195.7 million.

    For the three months ended September 30, 2024, net interest income, on a fully-taxable equivalent basis (fte), totaled $16.1 million, an increase of $914 thousand compared to the same period in 2023. A $77.5 million increase in average interest-earning assets, generated an increase in interest income of $4.0 million. Interest expense increased $3.1 million mainly due to higher deposit balances and higher rates on those deposits. Net interest margin (fte) for the three months ended September 30, 2024 was 2.99%, compared to 2.92% in the same period of 2023. The tax-equivalent yield on interest-earning assets increased 58 basis points to 5.31% during the three months ended September 30, 2024, compared to the same prior year period, while the cost of interest-bearing liabilities increased 62 basis points to 3.09%.

    Net interest income (fte) for the nine-months ended September 30, 2024 totaled $45.6 million, which was $1.2 million lower than the same period in 2023, due primarily to a $14.8 million increase in the cost of interest-bearing liabilities. The net interest margin (fte) was 2.87% for the nine-months ended September 30, 2024, as compared to 3.10% for the nine-months ended September 30, 2023.

    Other income for the three months ended September 30, 2024, totaled $2.3 million, compared to $2.3 million for the same period in 2023. For the nine-months ended September 30, 2024, other income totaled $6.5 million, compared to $6.0 million for the nine-months ended September 30, 2023.

    Other expenses totaled $12.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2024, an increase of $755 thousand, compared to the $11.3 million for the same period of 2023. For the nine-months ended September 30, 2024, other expenses totaled $35.2 million, compared to $32.6 million for the same period in 2023, due primarily to an increase in salaries and benefits, professional fees, data processing costs and FDIC insurance.

    Jim Donnelly President and CEO of Norwood Financial Corp and Wayne Bank, stated, “We are pleased to present our result of operations for the third quarter. Although strong loan growth caused an increase in our provision for credit losses we welcome the ongoing opportunity to serve our customers. Net interest margin (fte) for this quarter eclipsed the margin for last year, something that hasn’t happened since the Federal Reserve began raising interest rates. Our capital base remains above “Well-Capitalized” targets and we continue to show less impact from the market value of our bond portfolio. Additionally, our credit quality metrics remained strong during the third quarter, which we believe should benefit future performance. We appreciate the opportunity to serve our Wayne Bank customers and our customers at the Bank of the Finger Lakes and Bank of Cooperstown locations. We continue to look for opportunities available to us as we service our growing base of stockholders and customers.”

    Norwood Financial Corp is the parent company of Wayne Bank, which operates from fourteen offices throughout Northeastern Pennsylvania and fifteen offices in 4 Delaware, Sullivan, Ontario, Otsego and Yates Counties, New York. The Company’s stock trades on the Nasdaq Global Market under the symbol “NWFL”.

    Forward-Looking Statements

    The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 contains safe harbor provisions regarding forward-looking statements. When used in this discussion, the words “believes”, “anticipates”, “contemplates”, “expects”, “bode”, “future performance” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Such statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected. Those risks and uncertainties include, among other things, changes in federal and state laws, changes in interest rates, our ability to maintain strong credit quality metrics, our ability to have future performance, our ability to control core operating expenses and costs, demand for real estate, government fiscal and trade policies, cybersecurity and general economic conditions. The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly release the results of any revisions to those forward-looking statements which may be made to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

    Non-GAAP Financial Measures

    This release references net interest income on a fully taxable-equivalent basis (fte), which is a non-GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) financial measure. Fully taxable-equivalent net interest income was derived from GAAP interest income and net interest income using an assumed tax rate of 21%. We believe the presentation of net interest income on a fully taxable-equivalent basis ensures comparability of net interest income arising from both taxable and tax-exempt sources and is consistent with industry practice.

    The following table reconciles net interest income to net interest income on a fully taxable-equivalent basis:

         
    (dollars in thousands) Three months ended Nine months ended
    September 30 September 30
        2024     2023     2024     2023
    Net Interest Income $         15,931   $         15,039   $         45,566   $         46,774
    Taxable equivalent basis
    adjustment using 21% marginal
    tax rate
      207     185     601     554
    Net interest income on a fully
    taxable equivalent basis
    $ 16,138   $ 15,224   $ 46,167   $ 47,328
                           

    This release also references average tangible equity, which is also a non-GAAP financial measure. Average tangible equity is calculated by deducting average goodwill and other intangible assets from average stockholders’ equity. The Company believes that disclosure of tangible equity ratios enhances investor understanding of our financial position and improves the comparability of our financial data.

    The following table reconciles average equity to average tangible equity:

           
      Three months ended   Nine months ended
    (dollars in thousands) September 30   September 30
        2024      2023     2024     2023
    Average equity $ 189,135   $ 175,224   $ 183,593    $ 174,943
    Average goodwill and other
    intangibles
       (29,440)     (29,514)      (29,457)     (29,536)
    Average tangible equity $ 159,695   $ 145,710   $ 154,136   $ 145,407
                           

    Contact: John M. McCaffery
    Executive Vice President &
    Chief Financial Officer
    NORWOOD FINANCIAL CORP
    272-304-3003
    www.waynebank.com

     
    NORWOOD FINANCIAL CORP
    Consolidated Balance Sheets
    (dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)
    (unaudited)
      September 30
        2024
      2023
     
    ASSETS              
    Cash and due from banks $  47,072     $ 41,141  
    Interest-bearing deposits with banks   35,808       13,005  
    Cash and cash equivalents   82,880       54,146  
                   
    Securities available for sale   396,891       380,499  
    Loans receivable   1,675,139       1,611,069  
    Less: Allowance for credit losses   18,699       16,086  
    Net loans receivable   1,656,440       1,594,983  
    Regulatory stock, at cost   6,329       8,843  
    Bank premises and equipment, net   18,503       17,254  
    Bank owned life insurance   46,382       46,197  
    Foreclosed real estate owned   0       290  
    Accrued interest receivable   8,062       7,759  
    Deferred tax assets, net   18,818       25,610  
    Goodwill   29,266       29,266  
    Other intangible assets   167       240  
    Other assets   16,013       14,911  
    TOTAL ASSETS $         2,279,751     $         2,179,998  
               
    LIABILITIES          
    Deposits:          
    Non-interest bearing demand $ 420,967     $ 430,242  
    Interest-bearing   1,434,284       1,316,582  
    Total deposits   1,855,251       1,746,824  
    Short-term borrowings   52,453       103,881  
    Other borrowings   144,959       137,447  
    Accrued interest payable   12,688       8,605  
    Other liabilities   18,746       18,539  
    TOTAL LIABILITIES   2,084,097       2,015,296  
                   
    STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
    Preferred Stock, no par value per share, authorized 5,000,000 shares
             
    Common Stock, $.10 par value per share,              
    authorized: 20,000,000 shares,
    issued: 2024: 8,311,851 shares, 2023: 8,291,401 shares
      831       829  
    Surplus   98,330       97,449  
    Retained earnings   140,489       137,363  
    Treasury stock, at cost: 2024: 221,140 shares, 2023: 222,051 shares   (5,969 )     (5,957 )
    Accumulated other comprehensive loss   (38,027 )     (64,982 )
    TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY   195,654       164,702  
    TOTAL LIABILITIES AND
    STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
    $ 2,279,751     $ 2,179,998  
             
    NORWOOD FINANCIAL CORP
    Consolidated Statements of Income
    (dollars in thousands, except per share data)
    (unaudited)
           
        Three Months Ended September 30,   Nine Months Ended September 30,
        2024  2023     2024       2023  
    INTEREST INCOME                      
    Loans receivable, including fees $ 25,464   22,021   $ 73,266   $ 61,881  
    Securities   2,526     2,433     7,635     7,418  
    Other   497     54     2,194     156  
    Total Interest income   28,487     24,508     83,095     69,455  
                         
    INTEREST EXPENSE                    
    Deposits   10,553     7,017     31,349     17,119  
    Short-term borrowings   323     1,126     1,015     2,702  
    Other borrowings   1,680     1,326     5,165     2,860  
    Total Interest expense   12,556     9,469     37,529     22,681  
    NET INTEREST INCOME   15,931     15,039     45,566     46,774  
    PROVISION FOR CREDIT LOSSES   1,345   $ 882   $         1,069   $ (568 )
    NET INTEREST INCOME AFTER PROVISION FOR CREDIT LOSSES   14,586     14,157     44,497     47,342  
                         
    OTHER INCOME                    
    Service charges and fees   1,517     1,527     4,364     4,192  
    Income from fiduciary activities   256     246     719     688  
    Net realized (losses) gains on sales of securities               (209 )
    Gains on sales of loans, net   103     18     145     27  
    Gains on sales of foreclosed real estate owned       13     32     13  
    Earnings and proceeds on life insurance policies   261     328     781     770  
    Other   158     174     467     520  
    Total other income   2,295     2,306     6,508     6,001  
                         
    OTHER EXPENSES                    
    Salaries and employee benefits   6,239     6,083     18,328     17,893  
    Occupancy, furniture and equipment   1,269     1,242     3,758     3,818  
    Data processing and related operations   1,162     876     3,208     2,465  
    Taxes, other than income   179     167     452     490  
    Professional fees   576     524     1,669     1,132  
    FDIC Insurance assessment   339     254     1,009     699  
    Foreclosed real estate   9     9     45     112  
    Amortization of intangibles   16     20     54     66  
    Other   2,242     2,101     6,683     5,974  
    Total other expenses   12,031     11,276     35,206     32,649  
                             
    INCOME BEFORE TAX   4,850     5,187     15,799     20,694  
    INCOME TAX EXPENSE   1,006     1,068     3,308     4,289  
    NET INCOME $ 3,844   $ 4,119   $ 12,491   $ 16,405  
                             
    Basic earnings per share $ 0.48   $ 0.51   $ 1.55   $ 2.03  
                             
    Diluted earnings per share $ 0.48   $ 0.51   $ 1.55   $ 2.03  
                   
    NORWOOD FINANCIAL CORP
    Financial Highlights (Unaudited)
    (dollars in thousands, except per share data)
                 
    For the Three Months Ended September 30   2024       2023  
    Net interest income $         15,931     $         15,039  
    Net income   3,844       4,119  
                   
    Net interest spread (fully taxable equivalent)   2.23 %     2.26 %
    Net interest margin (fully taxable equivalent)   2.99 %     2.92 %
    Return on average assets   0.68 %     0.76 %
    Return on average equity   8.09 %     9.33 %
    Return on average tangible equity   9.58 %     11.22 %
    Basic earnings per share $         0.48     $         0.51  
    Diluted earnings per share $         0.48     $         0.51  
                   
    For the Nine Months Ended September 30   2024       2023  
    Net interest income $         45,566     $         46,774  
    Net income   12,491       16,405  
                   
    Net interest spread (fully taxable equivalent)   2.12 %     2.56 %
    Net interest margin (fully taxable equivalent)   2.87 %     3.10 %
    Return on average assets   0.75 %     1.04 %
    Return on average equity   9.09 %     12.54 %
    Return on average tangible equity   10.82 %     15.08 %
    Basic earnings per share $         1.55     $         2.03  
    Diluted earnings per share $         1.55     $         2.03  
                   
    As of September 30   2024       2023  
    Total assets $         2,279,751     $         2,179,998  
    Total loans receivable   1,675,139       1,611,069  
    Allowance for credit losses   18,699       16,086  
    Total deposits   1,855,251       1,746,824  
    Stockholders’ equity   195,654       164,702  
    Trust assets under management   209,857       185,913  
                   
    Book value per share $         24.92     $         21.15  
    Tangible book value per share $         21.28     $         17.49  
    Equity to total assets   8.58 %     7.56 %
    Allowance to total loans receivable   1.12 %     1.00 %
    Nonperforming loans to total loans   0.47 %     0.65 %
    Nonperforming assets to total assets   0.35 %     0.50 %
     
    NORWOOD FINANCIAL CORP
    Consolidated Balance Sheets (unaudited)
    (dollars in thousands)
      September 30
    2024
    June 30
    2024
    March 31
    2024
    December 31
    2023
    September 30
    2023
    ASSETS          
    Cash and due from banks $         47,072   $         29,903   $         19,519   $         28,533   $         41,141  
    Interest-bearing deposits with banks    35,808     39,492     92,444     37,587     13,005  
    Cash and cash equivalents   82,880     69,395     111,963     66,120     54,146  
                                   
    Securities available for sale   396,891     397,578     398,374     406,259     380,499  
    Loans receivable   1,675,139     1,641,356     1,621,448     1,603,618     1,611,069  
    Less: Allowance for credit losses   18,699     17,807     18,020     18,968     16,086  
    Net loans receivable   1,656,440     1,623,549     1,603,428     1,584,650     1,594,983  
    Regulatory stock, at cost   6,329     6,443     6,545     7,318     8,843  
    Bank owned life insurance   46,382     46,121     45,869     46,439     46,197  
    Bank premises and equipment, net   18,503     18,264     18,057     17,838     17,254  
    Foreclosed real estate owned   0     0     97     97     290  
    Goodwill and other intangibles   29,433     29,449     29,468     29,487     29,506  
    Other assets   42,893     44,517     46,622     42,871     48,280  
    TOTAL ASSETS $         2,279,751   $         2,235,316   $         2,260,423   $         2,201,079   $         2,179,998  
               
    LIABILITIES          
    Deposits              
    Non-interest bearing demand $         420,967   $         391,849   $         383,362   $         399,545   $         430,242  
    Interest-bearing deposits   1,434,284     1,419,323     1,455,636     1,395,614     1,316,582  
    Total deposits   1,855,251     1,811,172     1,838,998     1,795,159     1,746,824  
    Borrowings   197,412     210,422     211,234     198,312     241,328  
    Other liabilities   31,434     31,534     28,978     26,538     27,144  
    TOTAL LIABILITIES   2,084,097     2,053,128     2,079,210     2,020,009     2,015,296  
                                   
    STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY   195,654     182,188     181,213     181,070     164,702  
                                   
    TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY $         2,279,751   $         2,235,316   $         2,260,423   $         2,201,079   $         2,179,998  
                 
    NORWOOD FINANCIAL CORP
    Consolidated Statements of Income (unaudited)
    (dollars in thousands, except per share data)
           
                 
        September 30
    2024
    June 30
    2024
    March 31
    2024
    December 31
    2023
    September 30
    2023
    Three months ended  
    INTEREST INCOME            
    Loans receivable, including fees $ 25,464   $ 24,121   $ 23,681   $ 23,328   $ 22,021  
    Securities   2,526     2,584     2,526     2,504     2,433  
    Other   497     966     731     253     54  
    Total interest income   28,487     27,671     26,938     26,085     24,508  
                                   
    INTEREST EXPENSE            
    Deposits   10,553     10,687     10,110     8,910     7,017  
    Borrowings   2,003     2,059     2,118     1,882     2,452  
    Total interest expense   12,556     12,746     12,228     10,792     9,469  
    NET INTEREST INCOME   15,931     14,925     14,710     15,293     15,039  
    (RELEASE OF) PROVISION FOR CREDIT LOSSES   1,345     347     (624   6,116     882  
    NET INTEREST INCOME AFTER (RELEASE OF)
    PROVISION FOR CREDIT LOSSES
               
    14,586     14,578     15,334     9,177     14,157  
                 
    OTHER INCOME                              
    Service charges and fees   1,517     1,504     1,343     1,421     1,527  
    Income from fiduciary activities   256     225     238     210     246  
    Net realized (losses) gains on sales of securities                    
    Gains on sales of loans, net   103     36     6     36     18  
    Gains on sales of foreclosed real estate owned       32         66     13  
    Earnings and proceeds on life insurance policies   261     253     268     242     328  
    Other   158     157     151     148     174  
    Total other income   2,295     2,207     2,006     2,123     2,306  
                                   
    OTHER EXPENSES            
    Salaries and employee benefits   6,239     5,954     6,135     5,672     6,083  
    Occupancy, furniture and equipment, net   1,269     1,229     1,261     1,265     1,242  
    Foreclosed real estate   9     15     21     17     9  
    FDIC insurance assessment   339     309     361     287     254  
    Other   4,175     3,937     3,954     3,608     3,688  
    Total other expenses   12,031     11,444     11,732     10,849     11,276  
                                   
    INCOME BEFORE TAX   4,850     5,341     5,608     451     5,187  
    INCOME TAX EXPENSE   1,006     1,128     1,175     96     1,068  
    NET INCOME $ 3,844   $ 4,213   $ 4,433   $ 355   $ 4,119  
                                   
    Basic earnings per share $ 0.48   $ 0.52   $ 0.55   $ 0.04   $ 0.51  
                                   
    Diluted earnings per share $ 0.48   $ 0.52   $ 0.55   $ 0.04   $ 0.51  
                                   
    Book Value per share $ 24.92   $ 23.26   $ 23.01   $ 22.99   $ 21.15  
    Tangible Book Value per share   21.28     19.62     19.38     19.36     17.49  
                                   
    Return on average assets (annualized)   0.68 %   0.75 %   0.80 %   0.06   0.76 %
    Return on average equity (annualized)   8.09 %   9.41   9.79   0.84   9.33 %
    Return on average tangible equity (annualized)   9.58 %   11.26   11.68   1.01   11.22 %
                                   
    Net interest spread (fte)   2.23 %   2.05   2.07   2.24   2.28 %
    Net interest margin (fte)   2.99 %   2.79   2.79   2.95   2.94 %
                                   
    Allowance for credit losses to total loans   1.12 %   1.08   1.11   1.18   1.00 %
    Net charge-offs to average loans (annualized)   0.08 %   0.13   0.08   0.79   0.59 %
    Nonperforming loans to total loans   0.47 %   0.47   0.23   0.48   0.65 %
    Nonperforming assets to total assets   0.35 %   0.34   0.17   0.35   0.50 %
    NORWOOD FINANCIAL CORP
    NET INTEREST MARGIN ANALYSIS
    (dollars in thousands)

      For the Quarter Ended
      September 30, 2024 For the Quarter Ended June 30, 2024 September 30, 2023
    Average
    Balance
    (2)
    Interest
    (1) 
    Average
    Rate
    (3)
    Average
    Balance
    (2)
    Interest
    (1)
    Average
    Rate

    (3)
    Average
    Balance
    (2)
    Interest
    (1) 
    Average
    Rate
     (3)

    Assets                      
    Interest-earning assets:                      
    Interest-bearing deposits with banks $ 36,221   $ 497   5.46 % $ 69,173   $ 967   5.62 % $ 3,675   $ 54   5.83 %
    Securities available for sale:                      
    Taxable   392,168     2,161   2.19     401,014     2,206   2.21     406,962     2,052   2.00  
    Tax-exempt (1)   67,563     461   2.71     69,126     477   2.78     70,219     483   2.73  
    Total securities available for sale (1)   459,731     2,622   2.27     470,140     2,683   2.30     477,181     2,535   2.11  
    Loans receivable (1) (4) (5)   1,651,921     25,575   6.16     1,629,283     24,220   5.98     1,589,474     22,104   5.52  
    Total interest-earning assets   2,147,873     28,694   5.31     2,168,596     27,870   5.17     2,070,330     24,693   4.73  
    Non-interest earning assets:                      
    Cash and due from banks   28,193           26,422           27,910      
    Allowance for credit losses   (17,944 )         (18,023 )         (17,262 )    
    Other assets   78,344           69,718           65,863      
    Total non-interest earning assets   88,593           78,117           76,511      
    Total Assets $ 2,236,466         $ 2,246,713         $ 2,146,841      
    Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity                      
    Interest-bearing liabilities:                      
                           
    Interest-bearing demand and money market $ 461,897   $ 2,782   2.40   $ 450,918   $ 2,397   2.14   $ 439,255   $ 1,647   1.49  
    Savings   221,366     13   0.02     233,676     286   0.49     238,493     77   0.13  
    Time   734,235     7,758   4.20     755,224     8,004   4.26     611,607     5,293   3.43  
    Total interest-bearing deposits   1,417,498     10,553   2.96     1,439,818     10,687   2.99     1,289,355     7,017   2.16  
    Short-term borrowings   53,622     323   2.40     61,689     356   2.32     116,470     1,126   3.84  
    Other borrowings   146,357     1,680   4.57     149,442     1,703   4.58     116,700     1,326   4.51  
    Total interest-bearing liabilities   1,617,477     12,556   3.09     1,650,949     12,746   3.11     1,522,525     9,469   2.47  
    Non-interest bearing liabilities:                      
    Demand deposits   400,314           387,962           425,216      
    Other liabilities   29,540           28,308           23,876      
    Total non-interest bearing liabilities   429,854           416,270           449,092      
    Stockholders’ equity   189,135           179,494           175,224      
    Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity $ 2,236,466         $ 2,246,713         $ 2,146,841      
    Net interest income/spread (tax equivalent basis)     16,138   2.23 %     15,124   2.06 %     15,224   2.26 %
    Tax-equivalent basis adjustment     (207 )         (199 )         (185 )  
    Net interest income   $ 15,931         $ 14,925         $ 15,039    
    Net interest margin (tax equivalent basis)     2.99 %     2.80 %     2.92 %
                             

    (1) Interest and yields are presented on a tax-equivalent basis using a marginal tax rate of 21%.
    (2) Average balances have been calculated based on daily balances.
    (3) Annualized
    (4) Loan balances include non-accrual loans and are net of unearned income.
    (5) Loan yields include the effect of amortization of deferred fees, net of costs.

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI Economics: CBB Governor receives PM Fellowship Program candidate

    Source: Central Bank of Bahrain

    Published on 28 October 2024

    Manama, Kingdom of Bahrain – 28 October 2024 – HE Khalid Humaidan, Governor of the Central Bank of Bahrain, affirmed that the PM Fellowship Program reflects the Kingdom of Bahrain’s commitment to investing in its national workforce and engaging them in comprehensive development, under the leadership of His Majesty King Hamad bin Isa Al Khalifa and in line with the vision of His Royal Highness Prince Salman bin Hamad Al Khalifa, the Crown Prince and Prime Minister.

    HE the Governor received at his office Mr. Rashed Adel Kamal, the CBB employee selected as a candidate for the 10th intake of the Prime Minister’s Fellowship Program, and  congratulated him on his selection, wishing him ongoing success and benefit from the program’s opportunities.

    Mr. Kamal expressed his gratitude to HE the Governor for his continuous support for CBB employees in achieving their aspirations.

    Share this

    MIL OSI Economics

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: Nigeria: Escalation of mob violence emboldens impunity

    Source: Amnesty International –

    • At least 555 victims of mob violence recorded over the last decade
    • Upsurge of blasphemy killings fueled by alleged incitement from clerics
    • Allegations of corruption and policing failures perpetuating violence

    The failure of the Nigerian authorities to protect lives has led to a growing escalation of mob violence over the last decade, as people increasingly take law into their hands and carry out so- called ‘jungle justice,’ said Amnesty International Nigeria in a new report. 

    Instantly Killed: How Law Enforcement failures exacerbate wave of mob violence in Nigeria documents how victims accused of theft, blasphemy, shoplifting and witchcraft are beaten, tortured and killed with impunity and suspected perpetrators almost always get away with it. 

    Between January 2012 to August 2023, Amnesty International recorded at least 555 victims of mob violence (how many killed), from 363 documented incidents across Nigeria. Over the period of this investigation 57 people were killed by violent mobs; 32 were burnt alive, 2 persons were buried alive, while 23 people were tortured to death.

    “The menace of mob violence is perhaps one of the biggest threats to the right to life in Nigeria. The fact that these killings have been happening for a long time, with few cases investigated and prosecuted, highlights the authorities’ shocking failure to uphold and fulfil their obligation to protect people from harm and violence,” said Isa Sanusi, Director Amnesty International Nigeria.

    “The failure of law enforcement agencies, especially the Nigeria Police Force, to prevent mob violence, investigate allegations of torture and killings, and bring suspected perpetrators to justice, is empowering mobs to kill. The problem is compounded by weak and corrupt legal institutions and systems.” 

    Isa Sanusi, Director Amnesty International Nigeria

    Amnesty International’s research details cases of victims of mob violence that include at least 13 women, six children, and two people with actual or perceived mental health illnesses and/or psycho-social or intellectual disabilities. Cases of mob violence were documented in each of Nigeria’s six geopolitical zones: South-South (82), South-East (43), South-West (98), North-Central (42), North-West (100), and North-East (26).

    In the southern parts of Nigeria, mob violence is mostly targeted at those accused of theft, of taking part in rituals or practising witchcraft. In northern Nigeria, it is mostly used against those accused of blasphemy and often endorsed by religious clerics. 

    Those with mental health conditions and psycho-social disabilities are consistently targeted by violent mobs that use their disabilities to make false accusations against victims and to justify lynching them. 

    “It is appalling that mob violence is gradually becoming the norm, often meted out in crowded areas, such as motor parks, market areas and busy roads. Victims were always tortured including by beating, stoning, or via the use of improvised weapons like sticks and metal rods,” said Isa Sanusi.

    Many of the victims of mob violence were targeted because of their social status, identities as members of religious or other minority groups. Other reasons for targeting victims include attempts to curtail the rights to freedom of expression, and freedom from discrimination due to gender or specific conditions, including against women, children, and people with psycho-social disabilities.

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI Global: Somaliland elections: what’s at stake for independence, stability and shifting power dynamics in the Horn of Africa

    Source: The Conversation – Africa – By Brendon J. Cannon, Associate Professor, Khalifa University

    Somaliland is due to hold a presidential election on 13 November 2024.

    The results of the election will be important for two main reasons. First, what the leadership outcome will mean for Somaliland’s democratic credentials. Second, it will have implications for Somaliland’s push for recognition as an independent state.

    Thirty-three years ago, Somaliland declared its unilateral withdrawal from the Somali Union. It is an independent state in reality but unrecognised in law. Like other unrecognised states such as Taiwan, it doesn’t fly a flag at the United Nations in New York. It also suffers from a lack of access to global financing, and humanitarian and development aid, most of which must come via Mogadishu.

    Somaliland’s determination to achieve recognition was evident in January 2024 when it signed an agreement with neighbouring Ethiopia. Under this deal, Ethiopia would get access to the sea via a 19km strip of coastline, possibly near the port of Berbera (though three sites have been identified), and Addis Ababa would recognise Somaliland’s statehood. The agreement, which has yet to be ratified, was met with a storm of protests, including from Somalia.

    Somaliland is run by the ruling party, Kulmiye, which is led by Muse Bihi Abdi, Somaliland’s president since 2017. The party has been in power since 2010. The main opposition party is Waddani (also spelled Wadani), led by Abdirahman Mohamed Abdilahi (or Ciro/Irro).

    I have carried out a decade of research and fieldwork in Somaliland. In my view, this election carries weight in terms of Somaliland’s democratic health, as well as its prospects for peace and stability – within its borders and in the region.

    Somaliland’s democracy, like all democracies, relies on giving politicians and parties the chance to win elections. It is the voters who will decide who gets to run Somaliland next, and they face a clear choice between Kulmiye and Waddani.

    Political landscape

    Somaliland’s 2024 presidential election will be a test of its democratic institutions and a critical moment in its quest for independence.

    Kulmiye can point to milestones on the road to Somaliland’s recognition. It was in power when Somaliland and Taiwan (Republic of China) recognised one another and swapped diplomats.

    The party can also claim success for a strategy to get support from western states for Somaliland’s formal recognition. This includes the staffing and funding of Somaliland’s overseas missions in London, Washington DC and Dubai, among others. These act as non-accredited embassies for the country.

    Their work resulted in a non-official visit to Washington, DC by Bihi in 2022. The same year, a UK parliamentary delegation visited Hargeisa.

    Somaliland and Ethiopia also reached their agreement in January 2024. This is the closest Somaliland has come to gaining official recognition from another state.




    Read more:
    Somaliland has been pursuing independence for 33 years. Expert explains the impact of the latest deal with Ethiopia


    Like the ruling party, the opposition party Waddani fully supports the agreement with Ethiopia. It sees recognition from Somaliland’s huge neighbour – which also happens to host the headquarters of the African Union – as a first step to gaining official recognition.

    However, based on my recent interviews with a Waddani official, the party is likely to adopt a broader approach if it wins the upcoming election. Instead of focusing solely on western states like the US and the UK, Waddani plans to approach African and global south states, such as Senegal and Kenya, for support.

    This potential shift reflects an understanding that both regional and global dynamics are changing.

    Waddani’s broader diplomatic strategy is reinforced by its recent coalition with KAAH (the Somali acronym for Alliance for Equity and Development). KAAH is a young political association rather than a formal political party. Somaliland has a constitutional limit of three official parties.

    KAAH was formed, in part, by experienced politicians. In building a coalition, Waddani and KAAH hope to displace Somaliland’s current third party, the Justice and Welfare Party.

    KAAH’s support is partially based in Somaliland’s eastern region, which has experienced violent upheavals in recent years. This coalition promises to better incorporate the eastern regions and clans into the government should Waddani win.

    Regardless of the outcome of the election, one issue unites Somaliland’s political parties: the push for independence.

    Regional implications

    A peaceful election would reinforce Somaliland’s claim as a stable, democratic entity.

    Mogadishu should not expect any winds of change to blow from Hargeisa if Waddani wins. Three generations and counting have been raised in a de-facto independent Somaliland and they remember the violent dissolution from the Somali Union. This included the bombing of Hargeisa, the destruction of Berbera port and the displacement of thousands of people. Somalilanders largely support independence.

    Neither Waddani nor Kulmiye will be wishy-washy on this issue. And there will be forward movement on the Ethiopia-Somaliland agreement. This is likely to lead to increased tensions in the Horn region. As it is, Ethiopia and Somaliland are disturbed by the prospect of a resurgent Somalia supported by Egypt with arms and troops.




    Read more:
    Somaliland crisis: delayed elections and armed conflict threaten dream of statehood


    There won’t be a shooting war – Mogadishu still has far too many problems with al-Shabaab, clan infighting and a lack of resources and training. But history shows that states take extreme measures if they feel existentially threatened.

    Mogadishu’s stance is to retake Somaliland at all costs. And it has much of the world’s tacit support for its “one Somalia” policy. That makes Somaliland a textbook case of an existentially threatened state.

    Risks that lie ahead

    There are some risks of instability regardless of who wins the election.

    The Isaaq clan controls much of the political and economic landscape. This may intensify tensions, especially if minority clans feel sidelined. Waddani’s promise of inclusivity may appeal to marginalised groups, but clan-based grievances have grown over the past decade.

    There’s also the risk of unrest among Isaaq loyalists if power shifts too much. And allegations of electoral fraud or voter suppression could fuel protests.

    After 2022’s violent postponement due to election disputes, maintaining peace will require transparency, clan reconciliation and careful oversight to prevent renewed conflict.

    Despite these risks, Somaliland is again (better late than never) going to the polls. Regardless of who wins, this is good news for Somaliland and its ongoing push for independence recognition.

    Brendon J. Cannon does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. Somaliland elections: what’s at stake for independence, stability and shifting power dynamics in the Horn of Africa – https://theconversation.com/somaliland-elections-whats-at-stake-for-independence-stability-and-shifting-power-dynamics-in-the-horn-of-africa-242131

    MIL OSI – Global Reports

  • MIL-OSI: Ozop Capital Partners, Inc. Enters Agreement with Empire Auto Protect

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Empire Auto Protect to White Label the Fully Charged VSC as EMPIRE PLUS

    Warwick, NY, Oct. 28, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — OZOP Capital Partners, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Ozop Energy Solutions, Inc. (OZSC or the “Company”), announces the execution of a White Label Agreement with Empire Auto Protect, a leading provider of comprehensive protection and aftermarket products to the automotive industry.

    Under the agreement, Empire will white label the Royal Administration’s Fully Charged Vehicle Service Contract, incorporating their own branding as Empire Plus. OZOP Plus will be providing battery protection and will be ceded the battery portion of all premiums sold through Empire. Empire’s version of the Fully Charged VSC will offer the same enhanced features and benefits of the Fully Charged VSC to their extensive customer base through their well-established marketing programs.

    The benefits of this white-label agreement are that Empire can immediately go to market with their branded version of the Fully Charged VSC and will also use Royal Administration as the Third-Party Administrator (the “TPA”) for any claims. Royal provides their TPA services for processing claims through their claims center. This seamless integration of services ensures that consumers and dealerships will experience a smooth and efficient claims process, further enhancing their overall experience.

    Brian Conway, CEO of Ozop Plus stated, “This agreement opens new revenue opportunities for OZOP Plus, from Empire’s comprehensive national marketing network which sees a monthly average of 5,000 + vehicle service policies written nationwide. This expansion allows the Fully Charged VSC to be accessible to new and current EV owners in addition to our total of 7,000+ dealerships, consolidating the strengths of both Royal Administration, Ozop Plus, and Empire within the automotive industry.”

    Empire Auto Protect, a trusted name in the automotive market, boasts a remarkable 17-year track record of offering a wide variety of top-rated vehicle service protection plans. As they launch a new Electric Vehicle product, the company is equally enthusiastic about integrating the Fully Charged VSC into their existing portfolio. This move aims to fortify their position in the market and provide their customers with a comprehensive suite of offerings to protect and enhance their electric vehicles.

    Robin and Michael Isaac Kassin, CEO & CFO of Empire Auto Protect talked about the partnership with Ozop Plus: “With this collaboration, we’re leveraging Empire Auto Protect’s cutting-edge digital technology to meet the evolving needs of today’s drivers. We’re excited to lead the warranty sector into a new era of efficiency and accessibility. Through our partnership with OZOP Plus, we will become the leading provider for EV and hybrid vehicles for all automotive warranty needs. This partnership will give customers access to a large network of fully charged Vehicle Service Contracts, offering the best warranty options tailored to each consumer, giving all drivers the peace of mind they deserve.”

    About Ozop Energy Solutions.

    Ozop Energy Solutions (Ozop Energy Solutions (http://ozopenergy.com/) is the flagship company that oversees a wide variety of products in various stages of development in the renewable energy sector. Our strategy focuses on capturing a significant share of the rapidly growing renewable energy market as a provider of assets and infrastructure needed to store energy.

    About Empire Auto Protect

    Empire Auto Protect is at the forefront of transforming the auto warranty landscape by integrating cutting-edge technology into every aspect of our services. Much like how Apple revolutionized consumer electronics and Tesla redefined automotive innovation, we are setting new standards in the warranty sector.

    Our advanced digital platforms streamline the warranty process, making it more efficient and user-friendly for customers. By harnessing data analytics and seamless online tools, we empower consumers with tailored warranty solutions that meet their unique needs. This commitment to innovation not only enhances customer experience but also positions Empire Auto Protect as the leading technology provider in the automotive warranty industry, driving it into a new digital age.

    https://empireautoprotect.com/

    About Automated Room Controls, Inc.

    Also known as ARC, Inc. its mission is to deliver cutting-edge technology that simplifies complex control needs, ensuring seamless integration and exceptional performance. We aim to lead the industry by continuously innovating and providing solutions that meet the evolving demands of our customers. Our vision is to make control systems smarter, more efficient, and more accessible to everyone.

    www.ARControl.com

    About Ozop Energy Systems, Inc.

    Ozop Energy Systems is a manufacturer and distributor of Renewable Energy products in the Energy Storage, Solar, Microgrids, and EV charging Station space. We offer a broad portfolio of Renewable Energy products at competitive prices with a commitment to customer satisfaction from selection, to ordering, shipping, and delivery.

    About Ozop Engineering and Design

    Ozop Engineering and Design engineers’ energy efficient, easy to install and use, digital lighting controls solutions for commercial buildings, campuses, and sports complexes throughout North America. Products include relays panels, controllers, occupancy/vacancy sensors, daylight sensors and wall switch stations. Ozop has a dedicated design team that produces system drawings and a technical support group for product questions and onsite system commissioning. Our mission is to be recognized for our deep understanding of power management systems and ability to provide the right solution for each facility.

    www.ozopengineering.com

    About Ozop Capital Partners

    Ozop Capital Partners, Inc. is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, and wholly owns EV Insurance Company, Inc. (“EVIC”). EVIC, DBA Ozop Plus is licensed as a captive insurer that reinsures. www.OzopPlus.com

    https://twitter.com/OzopEnergy

    https://www.facebook.com/OzopEnergy/

    Safe Harbor Statement

    “This press release contains or may contain, among other things, certain forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements involve significant risks and uncertainties. Such statements may include, without limitation, statements with respect to the company’s plans, objectives, projections, expectations and intentions and other statements identified by words such as “projects,” “may,” “will,” “could,” “would,” “should,” “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “intends,” “plans,” “potential” or similar expressions. These statements are based upon the current beliefs and expectations of the company’s management and are subject to significant risks and uncertainties, including those detailed in the company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Actual results may differ significantly from those set forth in the forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements involve certain risks and uncertainties that are subject to change based on various factors (many of which are beyond the company’s control). The company undertakes no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by applicable law.”

    Investor Relations Contact – Ozop
    The Waypoint Refinery, LLC
    845-397-2956
    Visit our Discord:
    https://discord.gg/waypoint

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI: Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. Reports Third Quarter 2024 Earnings of $0.32 Per Share; Nine Month 2024 Earnings of $1.07 Per Share

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    EAU CLAIRE, Wis., Oct. 28, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) (Nasdaq: CZWI), the parent company of Citizens Community Federal N.A. (the “Bank” or “CCFBank”), today reported earnings of $3.3 million and earnings per diluted share of $0.32 for the third quarter ended September 30, 2024, compared to $3.7 million and earnings per diluted share of $0.35 for the quarter ended June 30, 2024, and $2.5 million and $0.24 earnings per diluted share for the quarter ended September 30, 2023, respectively.

    The Company’s third quarter 2024 operating results reflected the following changes from the second quarter of 2024: (1) no loan forbearance interest income in the third quarter compared to $0.2 million in the second quarter; (2) a $1.1 million decrease in negative provision for credit losses to $0.4 million in the third quarter; and (3) higher non-interest income of $1.0 million due to $0.5 million higher gain on sale of loans and $0.6 million lower net losses on sale of equity securities in the third quarter of 2024.

    Book value per share improved to $17.88 at September 30, 2024, compared to $17.10 at June 30, 2024, and $15.80 at September 30, 2023. Tangible book value per share (non-GAAP)1 was $14.64 at September 30, 2024, compared to $13.91 at June 30, 2024, and a 16.1% increase from $12.61 at September 30, 2023. For the third quarter of 2024, tangible book value was positively influenced by net income, net unrealized gains on the available for sale securities portfolio and intangible amortization. Stockholders’ equity as a percentage of total assets was 10.01% at September 30, 2024, compared to 9.77% at June 30, 2024. Tangible common equity (“TCE”) as a percent of tangible assets (non-GAAP)1 was 8.35% at September 30, 2024, compared to 8.09% at June 30, 2024, with the changes above impacted favorably by asset shrinkage.

    “We continued to execute on our strategic objectives during the third quarter that further strengthened franchise value. The quarter reflected our balance sheet optimization efforts, which increased tangible common equity levels and allowed for the continued repurchase of shares at prices that were accretive to tangible book value per share and earnings per share. The TCE ratio increased to 8.35%, from 8.09% in the prior quarter, which included the impact of repurchasing 223 thousand shares. Deposits, net of the decrease in brokered deposits, increased $31 million. While credit metrics were impacted by an increase in nonperforming loans, the increase largely reflected one lending relationship. Meanwhile, we continue to maintain a healthy reserve for credit losses to total loans at 1.47%,” stated Stephen Bianchi, Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer.

    September 30, 2024, Highlights:

    • Quarterly earnings were $3.3 million, or $0.32 per diluted share for the quarter ended September 30, 2024, a decrease from the quarter ended June 30, 2024, earnings of $3.7 million, or $0.35 per diluted share, and an increase from the quarter ended September 30, 2023, earnings of $2.5 million, or $0.24 per diluted share.
    • Net interest income decreased $0.3 million for the current quarter ended September 30, 2024, from $11.6 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2024, and decreased from $12.1 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2023. The decrease in net interest income from the second quarter of 2024 was primarily due to lower non-recurring interest income of $0.2 million recognized in the second quarter from curing technical defaults on performing loans.
    • The net interest margin was 2.63% for the quarter ended September 30, 2024, compared to 2.72% for the previous quarter, and 2.79% for the quarter ended September 30, 2023. The net interest margin declined nine basis points in the third quarter, of which five basis points were due to no interest income recognition from curing technical defaults.
    • In the third quarter ended September 30, 2024, a negative provision for credit losses of $0.4 million was recorded compared to a negative provision for credit losses of $1.525 million in the quarter ended June 30, 2024, and a negative provision for credit losses of $0.30 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2023. The third quarter’s negative provision was due to decreases in on-balance sheet allowance for credit losses (“ACL”) of $0.1 million and a $0.3 million decrease in off-balance sheet ACL due to a reduction in unfunded loan commitments.
    • Non-interest income increased $1.0 million in the third quarter of 2024, due to $0.5 million of higher gain on sale of loans and $0.6 million of lower net losses on equity securities and was $0.4 million higher compared to the third quarter of 2023, due to higher gain on sale of loans.
    • Non-interest expense increased $122 thousand to $10.4 million from $10.3 million for the previous quarter and increased $452 thousand from $10.0 million one year earlier.
    • Gross loans decreased by $3.9 million during the third quarter ended September 30, 2024, to $1.43 billion, compared to June 30, 2024.
    • Total deposits increased $1.1 million, more than offsetting the $30.1 million decrease in brokered deposits during the quarter ended September 30, 2024, to $1.52 billion, compared to June 30, 2024.
    • Federal Home Loan Bank advances decreased $10.5 million to $21.0 million at September 30, 2024, from $31.5 million at June 30, 2024.
    • The effective tax rate was 21.48% for the quarter ended September 30, 2024, compared to 22.1% for the quarter ended June 30, 2024, and 50.5% for the quarter ended September 30, 2023. The change in tax rate from 2023 is largely due to the Wisconsin state legislation in the third quarter of 2023, eliminating the Company’s state income tax in Wisconsin.
    • Nonperforming assets increased to $17.1 million at September 30, 2024, compared to $10.3 million at June 30, 2024. The increase was largely due to one agricultural real estate loan relationship in forestry services that moved from special mention to substandard and was placed on nonaccrual in the third quarter.
    • Common stock totaling 223 thousand shares were repurchased in the third quarter of 2024 at an average price of $12.91 per share.
    • The efficiency ratio was 72% for the quarters ended September 30, 2024 and June 30, 2024.

    Balance Sheet and Asset Quality

    Total assets decreased by $3.2 million during the quarter to $1.80 billion at September 30, 2024.

    Securities available for sale (“AFS”) increased $3.0 million during the quarter ended September 30, 2024, to $149.4 million from $146.4 million at June 30, 2024. The increase was due to: (1) pre-tax unrealized gains of $4.6 million; and (2) a purchase of $2.9 million of agency MBS to support the Bank’s CRA program partially offset by principal repayments of $4.5 million.

    Securities held to maturity (“HTM”) decreased $1.6 million to $87.0 million during the quarter ended September 30, 2024, from $88.6 million at June 30, 2024, due to principal repayments.

    The on-balance sheet liquidity ratio, which is defined as the fair market value of AFS and HTM securities that are not pledged and cash on deposit with other financial institutions, was 11.46% of total assets at September 30, 2024, compared to 11.48% at June 30, 2024. On-balance sheet liquidity, collateralized new borrowing capacity and uncommitted federal funds borrowing availability was $718 million, or 269%, of uninsured and uncollateralized deposits at September 30, 2024, and $714 million, or 289%, at June 30, 2024.

    Gross loans decreased by $3.9 million during the third quarter ended September 30, 2024, due to loan payoffs exceeding origination activity and construction loan fundings.

    The office loan portfolio totaled $31.0 million at quarter end and consists of 71 loans. There was one criticized loan in this portfolio during the quarter ended September 30, 2024, totaling $0.2 million and there have been no charge-offs in the trailing twelve months.

    The allowance for credit losses on loans decreased by $0.2 million to $21.0 million at September 30, 2024, representing 1.47% of total loans receivable compared to 1.48% of total loans receivable at June 30, 2024. For the quarter ended September 30, 2024, the Bank recorded negative provision of $0.4 million which included a negative provision on ACL for loans of $0.1 million and a negative provision of $0.3 million on ACL for unfunded commitments.

    Allowance for Credit Losses (“ACL”) – Loans Percentage

    (in thousands, except ratios)

      September 30, 2024   June 30, 2024   December 31, 2023   September 30, 2023
    Loans, end of period $ 1,424,828     $ 1,428,588     $ 1,460,792     $ 1,447,529  
    Allowance for credit losses – Loans $ 21,000     $ 21,178     $ 22,908     $ 22,973  
    ACL – Loans as a percentage of loans, end of period   1.47 %     1.48 %     1.57 %     1.59 %

    In addition to the ACL – Loans, the Company has established an ACL – Unfunded Commitments of $0.460 million at September 30, 2024, $0.712 million at June 30, 2024, and $1.571 million at September 30, 2023, classified in other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets.

    Allowance for Credit Losses – Unfunded Commitments:
    (in thousands)

      September 30, 2024
    and Three Months
    Ended
      September 30, 2023
    and Three Months
    Ended
      September 30, 2024
    and Nine Months
    Ended
      September 30, 2023
    and Nine Months
    Ended
    ACL – Unfunded commitments – beginning of period $ 712     $ 1,544   $ 1,250     $
    Cumulative effect of ASU 2016-13 adoption                   1,537
    (Reductions) additions to ACL – Unfunded commitments via provision for credit losses charged to operations   (252 )     27     (790 )     34
    ACL – Unfunded commitments – end of period $ 460     $ 1,571   $ 460     $ 1,571

    Special mention loans increased by $2.2 million to $11.0 million at September 30, 2024, compared to $8.8 million at June 30, 2024. The increase is largely due to one loan of $8.7 million, which is secured by a multi-family unit. The addition of the multi-family unit to special mention was partially offset by the movement of a $7.7 million agricultural real estate loan relationship in forestry services that moved to substandard and was placed on nonaccrual.

    Substandard loans increased by $6.8 million to $21.2 million at September 30, 2024, compared to $14.4 million at June 30, 2024, due to the addition of the forestry services loan relationship noted above.

    Nonperforming assets increased to $17.1 million at September 30, 2024, compared to $10.3 million at June 30, 2024 largely due to the previously mentioned forestry services loan relationship.

      (in thousands)
      September 30, 2024   June 30, 2024   March 31, 2024   December 31, 2023   September 30, 2023
    Special mention loan balances $ 11,047   $ 8,848   $ 13,737   $ 18,392   $ 20,043
    Substandard loan balances   21,202     14,420     14,733     19,596     16,171
    Criticized loans, end of period $ 32,249   $ 23,268   $ 28,470   $ 37,988   $ 36,214

    Total deposits increased $1.1 million during the quarter ended September 30, 2024, to $1.52 billion. Consumer deposits increased $22.1 million, including an increase in CDs of $17.9 million. Commercial deposits increased by $20.0 million. Brokered deposits decreased $30.1 million as the company decreased brokered MMDAs by $24.6 million and $5.5 million in brokered CDs matured and were not replaced. Public deposits decreased $10.9 million, largely due to expected seasonal outflows.

    Deposit Portfolio Composition
    (in thousands)

      September 30,
    2024
      June 30,
    2024
      March 31,
    2024
      December 31,
    2023
      September 30,
    2023
    Consumer deposits $ 844,808   $ 822,665   $ 827,290   $ 814,899   $ 794,970
    Commercial deposits   432,361     412,385     414,088     423,762     429,358
    Public deposits   176,844     187,698     202,175     182,172     163,734
    Brokered deposits   66,654     96,796     83,936     98,259     85,173
    Total deposits $ 1,520,667   $ 1,519,544   $ 1,527,489   $ 1,519,092   $ 1,473,235


    Deposit Composition

    (in thousands)

      September 30,
    2024
      June 30,
    2024
      March 31,
    2024
      December 31,
    2023
      September 30,
    2023
    Non-interest-bearing demand deposits $ 256,840   $ 255,703   $ 248,537   $ 265,704   $ 275,790
    Interest-bearing demand deposits   346,971     353,477     361,278     343,276     336,962
    Savings accounts   169,096     170,946     177,595     176,548     183,702
    Money market accounts   366,067     370,164     387,879     374,055     312,689
    Certificate accounts   381,693     369,254     352,200     359,509     364,092
    Total deposits $ 1,520,667   $ 1,519,544     1,527,489   $ 1,519,092   $ 1,473,235

    At September 30, 2024, the deposit portfolio composition was 56% consumer, 28% commercial, 12% public, and 4% brokered deposits compared to 54% consumer, 27% commercial, 12% public, and 7% brokered deposits at June 30, 2024.

    Uninsured and uncollateralized deposits were $267.1 million, or 18% of total deposits, at September 30, 2024, and $246.7 million, or 16% of total deposits, at June 30, 2024. Uninsured deposits alone at September 30, 2024, were $413.6 million, or 27% of total deposits, and $401.6 million, or 26% of total deposits at June 30, 2024.

    Federal Home Loan Bank advances decreased $10.5 million to $21.0 million at September 30, 2024, from $31.5 million one quarter earlier.

    Common stock totaling 223 thousand shares were repurchased in the third quarter of 2024 at an average price of $12.91 per share. For the nine-month period ended September 30, 2024, 382 thousand shares of common stock were repurchased at an average price of $12.32 per share. There are 333 thousand shares remaining under the July 2024 Board of Director repurchase authorization plan.

    Review of Operations

    Net interest income decreased $0.3 million for the current quarter ended September 30, 2024, from $11.6 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2024, and decreased from $12.1 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2023. The decrease in net interest income from the second quarter of 2024 was primarily due to lower non-recurring interest income of $0.2 million recognized from curing technical defaults on performing loans during the prior quarter. The net interest margin declined nine basis points in the third quarter, of which five basis points were due to no interest income recognition from curing technical defaults.

    Net interest income and net interest margin analysis:
    (in thousands, except yields and rates)

      Three months ended
      September 30, 2024   June 30, 2024   March 31, 2024   December 31, 2023   September 30, 2023
      Net
    Interest
    Income
      Net
    Interest
    Margin
      Net
    Interest
    Income
      Net
    Interest
    Margin
      Net
    Interest
    Income
      Net
    Interest
    Margin
      Net
    Interest
    Income
      Net
    Interest
    Margin
      Net
    Interest
    Income
      Net
    Interest
    Margin
    As reported $ 11,285     2.63 %   $ 11,576     2.72 %   $ 11,905     2.77 %   $ 11,747     2.69 %   $ 12,121     2.79 %
    Less accretion for PCD loans   (45 )   (0.01 )%     (62 )   (0.01 )%     (75 )   (0.02 )%     (37 )   (0.01 )%     (39 )   (0.01 )%
    Less scheduled accretion interest   (33 )   (0.01 )%     (32 )   (0.01 )%     (33 )   (0.01 )%     (33 )   (0.01 )%     (77 )   (0.02 )%
    Without loan purchase accretion $ 11,207     2.61 %   $ 11,482     2.70 %   $ 11,797     2.74 %   $ 11,677     2.67 %   $ 12,005     2.76 %

    Non-interest income increased $1.0 million in the third quarter of 2024, due to $0.5 million of higher gain on sale of loans and $0.6 million of lower net losses on equity securities. Non-interest income was $0.4 million higher compared to the third quarter of 2023 due to higher gain on sale of loans.

    Non-interest expense increased $122 thousand to $10.4 million in the third quarter of 2024 from $10.3 million for the previous quarter and increased $452 thousand from $10.0 million one year earlier. The increase in the current quarter relative to the second quarter was primarily related to one-time data processing costs, modest REO losses and higher quarterly marketing spending, partially offset by $0.2 million in branch closure costs in the second quarter.

    Provision for income taxes decreased to $0.9 million in the third quarter of 2024 from $1.0 million in the second quarter of 2024 largely due to lower pre-tax income. The effective tax rate was 21.48% for the quarter ended September 30, 2024, 22.1% for the quarter ended June 30, 2024, and 50.5% for the quarter ended September 30, 2023. The change in tax rate from 2023 is largely due to the Wisconsin state legislation in the third quarter of 2023, eliminating the Company’s state income tax in Wisconsin.

    These financial results are preliminary until Form 10-Q is filed in November 2024.

    About the Company

    Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (NASDAQ: “CZWI”) is the holding company of the Bank, a national bank based in Altoona, Wisconsin, currently serving customers primarily in Wisconsin and Minnesota through 22 branch locations. Its primary markets include the Chippewa Valley Region in Wisconsin, the Twin Cities and Mankato markets in Minnesota, and various rural communities around these areas. The Bank offers traditional community banking services to businesses, ag operators and consumers, including residential mortgage loans.

    Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

    Certain statements contained in this release are considered “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements may be identified using forward-looking words or phrases such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “could,” “expect,” “estimates,” “intend,” “may,” “on pace,” “preliminary,” “planned,” “potential,” “should,” “will,” “would” or the negative of those terms or other words of similar meaning. Such forward-looking statements in this release are inherently subject to many uncertainties arising in the operations and business environment of the Company and the Bank. These uncertainties include: conditions in the financial markets and economic conditions generally; the impact of inflation on our business and our customers; geopolitical tensions, including current or anticipated impact of military conflicts; higher lending risks associated with our commercial and agricultural banking activities; future pandemics (including new variants of COVID-19); cybersecurity risks; adverse impacts on the regional banking industry and the business environment in which it operates; interest rate risk; lending risk; changes in the fair value or ratings downgrades of our securities; the sufficiency of allowance for credit losses; competitive pressures among depository and other financial institutions; disintermediation risk; our ability to maintain our reputation; our ability to maintain or increase our market share; our ability to realize the benefits of net deferred tax assets; our inability to obtain needed liquidity; our ability to raise capital needed to fund growth or meet regulatory requirements; our ability to attract and retain key personnel; our ability to keep pace with technological change; prevalence of fraud and other financial crimes; the possibility that our internal controls and procedures could fail or be circumvented; our ability to successfully execute our acquisition growth strategy; risks posed by acquisitions and other expansion opportunities, including difficulties and delays in integrating the acquired business operations or fully realizing the cost savings and other benefits; restrictions on our ability to pay dividends; the potential volatility of our stock price; accounting standards for credit losses; legislative or regulatory changes or actions, or significant litigation, adversely affecting the Company or Bank; public company reporting obligations; changes in federal or state tax laws; and changes in accounting principles, policies or guidelines and their impact on financial performance. Stockholders, potential investors, and other readers are urged to consider these factors carefully in evaluating the forward-looking statements and are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. Such uncertainties and other risks that may affect the Company’s performance are discussed further in Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” in the Company’s Form 10-K, for the year ended December 31, 2023, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on March 5, 2024 and the Company’s subsequent filings with the SEC. The Company undertakes no obligation to make any revisions to the forward-looking statements contained in this news release or to update them to reflect events or circumstances occurring after the date of this release.

    1Non-GAAP Financial Measures

    This press release contains non-GAAP financial measures, such as net income as adjusted, net income as adjusted per share, tangible book value, tangible book value per share, tangible common equity as a percent of tangible assets and return on average tangible common equity, which management believes may be helpful in understanding the Company’s results of operations or financial position and comparing results over different periods.

    Net income as adjusted and net income as adjusted per share are non-GAAP measures that eliminate the impact of certain expenses such as branch closure costs and related severance pay, accelerated depreciation expense and lease termination fees, and the gain on sale of branch deposits and fixed assets. Tangible book value, tangible book value per share, tangible common equity as a percentage of tangible assets and return on average tangible common equity are non-GAAP measures that eliminate the impact of goodwill and intangible assets on our financial position. Management believes these measures are useful in assessing the strength of our financial position.

    Where non-GAAP financial measures are used, the comparable GAAP financial measure, as well as the reconciliation to the comparable GAAP financial measure, can be found in this press release. These disclosures should not be viewed as a substitute for operating results determined in accordance with GAAP, nor are they necessarily comparable to non-GAAP performance measures that may be presented by other banks and financial institutions.

    Contact: Steve Bianchi, CEO
    (715)-836-9994

    (CZWI-ER)

     
    CITIZENS COMMUNITY BANCORP, INC.
    Consolidated Balance Sheets
    (in thousands, except shares and per share data)
     
      September 30, 2024
    (unaudited)
      June 30, 2024
    (unaudited)
      December 31, 2023
    (audited)
      September 30, 2023
    (unaudited)
    Assets              
    Cash and cash equivalents $ 36,632     $ 36,886     $ 37,138     $ 32,532  
    Securities available for sale “AFS”   149,432       146,438       155,743       153,414  
    Securities held to maturity “HTM”   87,033       88,605       91,229       92,336  
    Equity investments   5,096       5,023       3,284       2,433  
    Other investments   12,311       13,878       15,725       15,109  
    Loans receivable   1,424,828       1,428,588       1,460,792       1,447,529  
    Allowance for credit losses   (21,000 )     (21,178 )     (22,908 )     (22,973 )
    Loans receivable, net   1,403,828       1,407,410       1,437,884       1,424,556  
    Loans held for sale   697       275       5,773       2,737  
    Mortgage servicing rights, net   3,696       3,731       3,865       3,944  
    Office properties and equipment, net   17,365       17,774       18,373       19,465  
    Accrued interest receivable   6,235       6,289       5,409       5,936  
    Intangible assets   1,158       1,336       1,694       1,873  
    Goodwill   31,498       31,498       31,498       31,498  
    Foreclosed and repossessed assets, net   1,572       1,662       1,795       1,046  
    Bank owned life insurance (“BOLI”)   25,901       25,708       25,647       25,467  
    Other assets   16,683       15,794       16,334       18,741  
    TOTAL ASSETS $ 1,799,137     $ 1,802,307     $ 1,851,391     $ 1,831,087  
    Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity              
    Liabilities:              
    Deposits $ 1,520,667     $ 1,519,544     $ 1,519,092     $ 1,473,235  
    Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) advances   21,000       31,500       79,530       114,530  
    Other borrowings   61,548       61,498       67,465       67,407  
    Other liabilities   15,773       13,720       11,970       10,513  
    Total liabilities   1,618,988       1,626,262       1,678,057       1,665,685  
    Stockholders’ equity:              
    Common stock— $0.01 par value, authorized 30,000,000; 10,074,136, 10,297,341, 10,440,591, and 10,468,091 shares issued and outstanding, respectively   101       103       104       105  
    Additional paid-in capital   115,455       117,838       119,441       119,612  
    Retained earnings   78,438       75,501       71,117       67,424  
    Accumulated other comprehensive loss   (13,845 )     (17,397 )     (17,328 )     (21,739 )
    Total stockholders’ equity   180,149       176,045       173,334       165,402  
    TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY $ 1,799,137     $ 1,802,307     $ 1,851,391     $ 1,831,087  

    Note: Certain items previously reported were reclassified for consistency with the current presentation.

    CITIZENS COMMUNITY BANCORP, INC.
    Consolidated Statements of Operations
    (in thousands, except per share data)
     
      Three Months Ended   Nine Months Ended
      September 30, 2024 (unaudited)   June 30, 2024 (unaudited)   September 30, 2023 (unaudited)   September 30, 2024 (unaudited)   September 30, 2023 (unaudited)
    Interest and dividend income:                  
    Interest and fees on loans $ 20,115     $ 19,921     $ 19,083     $ 60,204     $ 54,169
    Interest on investments   2,397       2,542       2,689       7,450       8,053
    Total interest and dividend income   22,512       22,463       21,772       67,654       62,222
    Interest expense:                  
    Interest on deposits   10,165       9,338       7,388       28,712       17,898
    Interest on FHLB borrowed funds   128       576       1,210       1,216       4,595
    Interest on other borrowed funds   934       973       1,053       2,960       3,127
    Total interest expense   11,227       10,887       9,651       32,888       25,620
    Net interest income before provision for credit losses   11,285       11,576       12,121       34,766       36,602
    (Negative) provision for credit losses   (400 )     (1,525 )     (325 )     (2,725 )     175
    Net interest income after provision for credit losses   11,685       13,101       12,446       37,491       36,427
    Non-interest income:                  
    Service charges on deposit accounts   513       490       491       1,474       1,464
    Interchange income   577       579       601       1,697       1,743
    Loan servicing income   643       526       611       1,751       1,679
    Gain on sale of loans   752       226       299       1,998       1,501
    Loan fees and service charges   165       309       140       704       308
    Net realized gains on debt securities                           12
    Net (losses) gains on equity securities   (78 )     (658 )     116       (569 )     170
    Bank Owned Life Insurance (BOLI) death benefit         184             184      
    Other   349       257       307       859       893
    Total non-interest income   2,921       1,913       2,565       8,098       7,770
    Non-interest expense:                  
    Compensation and related benefits   5,743       5,675       5,293       16,901       15,967
    Occupancy   1,242       1,333       1,335       3,942       4,117
    Data processing   1,665       1,525       1,536       4,787       4,440
    Amortization of intangible assets   178       179       179       536       576
    Mortgage servicing rights expense, net   163       116       150       427       456
    Advertising, marketing and public relations   225       186       185       575       472
    FDIC premium assessment   201       200       204       606       608
    Professional services   336       347       342       1,249       1,153
    Losses (gains) on repossessed assets, net   65       (18 )     100       47       62
    Other   603       756       645       2,427       2,085
    Total non-interest expense   10,421       10,299       9,969       31,497       29,936
    Income before provision for income taxes   4,185       4,715       5,042       14,092       14,261
    Provision for income taxes   899       1,040       2,544       3,043       4,895
    Net income attributable to common stockholders $ 3,286     $ 3,675     $ 2,498     $ 11,049     $ 9,366
    Per share information:                  
    Basic earnings $ 0.32     $ 0.35     $ 0.24     $ 1.07     $ 0.89
    Diluted earnings $ 0.32     $ 0.35     $ 0.24     $ 1.07     $ 0.89
    Cash dividends paid $     $     $     $ 0.32     $ 0.29
    Book value per share at end of period $ 17.88     $ 17.10     $ 15.80     $ 17.88     $ 15.80
    Tangible book value per share at end of period (non-GAAP) $ 14.64     $ 13.91     $ 12.61     $ 14.64     $ 12.61

    Reconciliation of GAAP Net Income and Net Income as Adjusted (non-GAAP)

    (in thousands, except per share data)

      Three Months Ended   Nine Months Ended
      September 30,
    2024
      June 30,
    2024
      September 30,
    2023
      September 30,
    2024
      September 30,
    2023
                       
    GAAP pretax income $ 4,185   $ 4,715   $ 5,042   $ 14,092   $ 14,261
    Branch closure costs (1)       168         168    
    Pretax income as adjusted (2) $ 4,185   $ 4,883   $ 5,042   $ 14,260   $ 14,261
    Provision for income tax on net income as adjusted (3)   899     1,077     2,544     3,079     4,895
    Net income as adjusted (non-GAAP) (2) $ 3,286   $ 3,806   $ 2,498   $ 11,181   $ 9,366
    GAAP diluted earnings per share, net of tax $ 0.32   $ 0.35   $ 0.24   $ 1.07   $ 0.89
    Branch closure costs, net of tax       0.01         0.01    
    Diluted earnings per share, as adjusted, net of tax (non-GAAP) $ 0.32   $ 0.36   $ 0.24   $ 1.08   $ 0.89
                       
    Average diluted shares outstanding   10,204,195     10,373,089     10,470,098     10,339,802     10,474,685

    (1) Branch closure costs include severance pay recorded in compensation and benefits and depreciation and right of use lease asset accelerated expense included in other non-interest expense in the consolidated statement of operations.
    (2) Pretax income as adjusted and net income as adjusted are non-GAAP measures that management believes enhances the market’s ability to assess the underlying business performance and trends related to core business activities.
    (3) Provision for income tax on net income as adjusted is calculated at our effective tax rate for each respective period presented.


    Loan Composition

    (in thousands)

      September 30, 2024   June 30, 2024   December 31, 2023   September 30, 2023
    Total Loans:              
    Commercial/Agricultural real estate:              
    Commercial real estate $ 730,459     $ 729,236     $ 750,531     $ 750,282  
    Agricultural real estate   76,043       78,248       83,350       84,558  
    Multi-family real estate   239,191       234,758       228,095       219,193  
    Construction and land development   87,875       87,898       110,941       109,799  
    C&I/Agricultural operating:              
    Commercial and industrial   119,619       127,386       121,666       121,033  
    Agricultural operating   27,550       27,409       25,691       24,552  
    Residential mortgage:              
    Residential mortgage   134,944       133,503       129,021       125,939  
    Purchased HELOC loans   2,932       2,915       2,880       2,881  
    Consumer installment:              
    Originated indirect paper   4,405       5,110       6,535       7,175  
    Other consumer   5,438       5,860       6,187       6,440  
    Gross loans $ 1,428,456     $ 1,432,323     $ 1,464,897     $ 1,451,852  
    Unearned net deferred fees and costs and loans in process   (2,703 )     (2,733 )     (2,900 )     (3,048 )
    Unamortized discount on acquired loans   (925 )     (1,002 )     (1,205 )     (1,275 )
    Total loans receivable $ 1,424,828     $ 1,428,588     $ 1,460,792     $ 1,447,529  

    Nonperforming Assets
    Loan Balances at Amortized Cost

    (in thousands, except ratios)

      September 30, 2024   June 30, 2024   December 31, 2023   September 30, 2023
    Nonperforming assets:              
    Nonaccrual loans              
    Commercial real estate $ 4,778     $ 5,350     $ 10,359     $ 10,570  
    Agricultural real estate   6,193       382       391       469  
    Construction and land development   106             54       94  
    Commercial and industrial (“C&I”)   1,956       422              
    Agricultural operating   901       1,017       1,180       1,373  
    Residential mortgage   1,088       1,145       1,167       923  
    Consumer installment   20       36       33       27  
    Total nonaccrual loans $ 15,042     $ 8,352     $ 13,184     $ 13,456  
    Accruing loans past due 90 days or more   530       256       389       971  
    Total nonperforming loans (“NPLs”) at amortized cost   15,572       8,608       13,573       14,427  
    Foreclosed and repossessed assets, net   1,572       1,662       1,795       1,046  
    Total nonperforming assets (“NPAs”) $ 17,144     $ 10,270     $ 15,368     $ 15,473  
    Loans, end of period $ 1,424,828     $ 1,428,588     $ 1,460,792     $ 1,447,529  
    Total assets, end of period $ 1,799,137     $ 1,802,307     $ 1,851,391     $ 1,831,087  
    Ratios:              
    NPLs to total loans   1.09 %     0.60 %     0.93 %     1.00 %
    NPAs to total assets   0.95 %     0.57 %     0.83 %     0.85 %

    Average Balances, Interest Yields and Rates

    (in thousands, except yields and rates)

      Three Months Ended
    September 30, 2024
      Three Months Ended
    June 30, 2024
      Three Months Ended
    September 30, 2023
      Average
    Balance
      Interest
    Income/
    Expense
      Average
    Yield/
    Rate
      Average
    Balance
      Interest
    Income/
    Expense
      Average
    Yield/
    Rate
      Average
    Balance
      Interest
    Income/
    Expense
      Average
    Yield/
    Rate
    Average interest earning assets:                                  
    Cash and cash equivalents $ 25,187   $ 360   5.69 %   $ 18,894   $ 272   5.79 %   $ 21,298   $ 302   5.63 %
    Loans receivable   1,429,928     20,115   5.60 %     1,439,535     19,921   5.57 %     1,435,284     19,083   5.27 %
    Investment securities   236,960     1,966   3.30 %     238,147     2,012   3.40 %     252,226     2,119   3.33 %
    Other investments   12,553     71   2.25 %     13,051     258   7.95 %     15,511     268   6.85 %
    Total interest earning assets $ 1,704,628   $ 22,512   5.25 %   $ 1,709,627   $ 22,463   5.28 %   $ 1,724,319   $ 21,772   5.01 %
    Average interest-bearing liabilities:                                  
    Savings accounts $ 170,777   $ 450   1.05 %     174,259   $ 429   0.99 %   $ 199,279   $ 328   0.65 %
    Demand deposits   357,201     2,152   2.40 %     354,850   $ 2,023   2.29 %     354,073     1,863   2.09 %
    Money market accounts   381,369     3,126   3.26 %     377,346   $ 2,958   3.15 %     298,098     1,889   2.51 %
    CD’s   379,722     4,437   4.65 %     352,323   $ 3,928   4.48 %     358,238     3,308   3.66 %
    Total deposits $ 1,289,069   $ 10,165   3.14 %   $ 1,258,778   $ 9,338   2.98 %   $ 1,209,688   $ 7,388   2.42 %
    FHLB advances and other borrowings   80,338     1,062   5.26 %     121,967   $ 1,549   5.11 %     182,967     2,263   4.91 %
    Total interest-bearing liabilities $ 1,369,407   $ 11,227   3.26 %   $ 1,380,745   $ 10,887   3.17 %   $ 1,392,655   $ 9,651   2.75 %
    Net interest income     $ 11,285           $ 11,576           $ 12,121    
    Interest rate spread         1.99 %           2.11 %           2.26 %
    Net interest margin         2.63 %           2.72 %           2.79 %
    Average interest earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities         1.24             1.24             1.24  
      Nine Months Ended
    September 30, 2024
      Nine Months Ended
    September 30, 2023
      Average
    Balance
      Interest
    Income/
    Expense
      Average
    Yield/
    Rate
      Average
    Balance
      Interest
    Income/
    Expense
      Average
    Yield/
    Rate
    Average interest earning assets:                      
    Cash and cash equivalents $ 19,073   $ 823   5.76 %   $ 19,066   $ 768   5.39 %
    Loans receivable   1,441,972     60,204   5.58 %     1,420,423     54,169   5.10 %
    Interest bearing deposits         %     84     1   1.59 %
    Investment securities   240,054     6,038   3.36 %     261,507     6,505   3.33 %
    Other investments   12,983     589   6.06 %     16,447     779   6.33 %
    Total interest earning assets $ 1,714,082   $ 67,654   5.27 %   $ 1,717,527   $ 62,222   4.84 %
    Average interest-bearing liabilities:                      
    Savings accounts $ 173,946   $ 1,300   1.00 %   $ 208,446   $ 1,103   0.71 %
    Demand deposits   355,356     6,192   2.33 %     370,235     5,047   1.82 %
    Money market accounts   378,740     9,005   3.18 %     298,957     4,759   2.13 %
    CD’s   364,131     12,215   4.48 %     300,279     6,989   3.11 %
    Total deposits $ 1,272,173   $ 28,712   3.01 %   $ 1,177,917   $ 17,898   2.03 %
    FHLB advances and other borrowings   108,897     4,176   5.12 %     214,034     7,722   4.82 %
    Total interest-bearing liabilities $ 1,381,070   $ 32,888   3.18 %   $ 1,391,951   $ 25,620   2.46 %
    Net interest income     $ 34,766           $ 36,602    
    Interest rate spread         2.09 %           2.38 %
    Net interest margin         2.71 %           2.85 %
    Average interest earning assets to average interest bearing liabilities         1.24             1.23  


    Key Financial Metric Ratios:

      Three Months Ended   Nine Months Ended
      September 30, 2024   June 30, 2024   September 30, 2023   September 30, 2024   September 30, 2023
    Ratios based on net income:                  
    Return on average assets (annualized) 0.72 %   0.81 %   0.54 %   0.81 %   0.68 %
    Return on average equity (annualized) 7.34 %   8.52 %   5.97 %   8.46 %   7.59 %
    Return on average tangible common equity4 (annualized) 9.38 %   10.92 %   7.74 %   10.78 %   9.91 %
    Efficiency ratio 72 %   72 %   67 %   71 %   66 %
    Net interest margin with loan purchase accretion 2.63 %   2.72 %   2.79 %   2.71 %   2.85 %
    Net interest margin without loan purchase accretion 2.61 %   2.70 %   2.76 %   2.69 %   2.82 %
    Ratios based on net income as adjusted (non-GAAP)                  
    Return on average assets as adjusted2 (annualized) 0.72 %   0.84 %   0.54 %   0.82 %   0.68 %
    Return on average equity as adjusted3 (annualized) 7.34 %   8.82 %   5.97 %   8.56 %   7.59 %


    Reconciliation of Return on Average Assets

    (in thousands, except ratios)

      Three Months Ended   Nine Months Ended
      September 30, 2024   June 30, 2024   September 30, 2023   September 30, 2024   September 30, 2023
           
    GAAP earnings after income taxes $ 3,286     $ 3,675     $ 2,498     $ 11,049     $ 9,366  
    Net income as adjusted after income taxes (non-GAAP) (1) $ 3,286     $ 3,806     $ 2,498     $ 11,181     $ 9,366  
    Average assets $ 1,810,826     $ 1,815,693     $ 1,836,775     $ 1,822,106     $ 1,832,832  
    Return on average assets (annualized)   0.72 %     0.81 %     0.54 %     0.81 %     0.68 %
    Return on average assets as adjusted (non-GAAP) (annualized)   0.72 %     0.84 %     0.54 %     0.82 %     0.68 %

    (1) See Reconciliation of GAAP Net Income and Net Income as Adjusted (non-GAAP)


    Reconciliation of Return on Average Equity

    (in thousands, except ratios)

      Three Months Ended   Nine Months Ended
      September 30, 2024   June 30, 2024   September 30, 2023   September 30, 2024   September 30, 2023
    GAAP earnings after income taxes $ 3,286     $ 3,675     $ 2,498     $ 11,049     $ 9,366  
    Net income as adjusted after income taxes (non-GAAP) (1) $ 3,286     $ 3,806     $ 2,498     $ 11,181     $ 9,366  
    Average equity $ 178,050     $ 173,462     $ 166,131     $ 174,436     $ 165,075  
    Return on average equity (annualized)   7.34 %     8.52 %     5.97 %     8.46 %     7.59 %
    Return on average equity as adjusted (non-GAAP) (annualized)   7.34 %     8.82 %     5.97 %     8.56 %     7.59 %

    (1) See Reconciliation of GAAP Net Income and Net Income as Adjusted (non-GAAP)


    Reconciliation of Efficiency Ratio

    (in thousands, except ratios)

      Three Months Ended   Nine Months Ended
      September 30, 2024   June 30, 2024   September 30, 2023   September 30, 2024   September 30, 2023
    Non-interest expense (GAAP) $ 10,421     $ 10,299     $ 9,969     $ 31,497     $ 29,936  
    Less amortization of intangibles   (178 )     (179 )     (179 )     (536 )     (576 )
    Efficiency ratio numerator (GAAP) $ 10,243     $ 10,120     $ 9,790     $ 30,961     $ 29,360  
                       
    Non-interest income $ 2,921     $ 1,913     $ 2,565     $ 8,098     $ 7,770  
    Add back net losses on debt and equity securities   (78 )     (658 )           (569 )      
    Subtract net gains on debt and equity securities               116             182  
    Net interest income   11,285       11,576       12,121       34,766       36,602  
    Efficiency ratio denominator (GAAP) $ 14,284     $ 14,147     $ 14,570     $ 43,433     $ 44,190  
    Efficiency ratio (GAAP)   72 %     72 %     67 %     71 %     66 %


    Reconciliation of tangible book value per share (non-GAAP)

    (in thousands, except per share data)

    Tangible book value per share at end of period September 30, 2024   June 30, 2024   December 31, 2023   September 30, 2023
    Total stockholders’ equity $ 180,149     $ 176,045     $ 173,334     $ 165,402  
    Less: Goodwill   (31,498 )     (31,498 )     (31,498 )     (31,498 )
    Less: Intangible assets   (1,158 )     (1,336 )     (1,694 )     (1,873 )
    Tangible common equity (non-GAAP) $ 147,493     $ 143,211     $ 140,142     $ 132,031  
    Ending common shares outstanding   10,074,136       10,297,341       10,440,591       10,468,091  
    Book value per share $ 17.88     $ 17.10     $ 16.60     $ 15.80  
    Tangible book value per share (non-GAAP) $ 14.64     $ 13.91     $ 13.42     $ 12.61  


    Reconciliation of tangible common equity as a percent of tangible assets (non-GAAP)

    (in thousands, except ratios)

    Tangible common equity as a percent of tangible assets at end of period September 30, 2024   June 30, 2024   December 31, 2023   September 30, 2023
    Total stockholders’ equity $ 180,149     $ 176,045     $ 173,334     $ 165,402  
    Less: Goodwill   (31,498 )   $ (31,498 )     (31,498 )   $ (31,498 )
    Less: Intangible assets   (1,158 )   $ (1,336 )     (1,694 )   $ (1,873 )
    Tangible common equity (non-GAAP) $ 147,493     $ 143,211     $ 140,142     $ 132,031  
    Total Assets $ 1,799,137     $ 1,802,307     $ 1,851,391     $ 1,831,087  
    Less: Goodwill   (31,498 )     (31,498 )     (31,498 )   $ (31,498 )
    Less: Intangible assets   (1,158 )     (1,336 )     (1,694 )   $ (1,873 )
    Tangible Assets (non-GAAP) $ 1,766,481     $ 1,769,473     $ 1,818,199     $ 1,797,716  
    Total stockholders’ equity to total assets ratio   10.01 %     9.77 %     9.36 %     9.03 %
    Tangible common equity as a percent of tangible assets (non-GAAP)   8.35 %     8.09 %     7.71 %     7.34 %


    Reconciliation of Return on Average Tangible Common Equity (non-GAAP)

    (in thousands, except ratios)

      Three Months Ended   Nine Months Ended
      September 30, 2024   June 30, 2024   September 30, 2023   September 30, 2024   September 30, 2023
    Total stockholders’ equity $ 180,149     $ 176,045     $ 165,402     $ 180,149     $ 165,402  
    Less: Goodwill   (31,498 )     (31,498 )     (31,498 )     (31,498 )     (31,498 )
    Less: Intangible assets   (1,158 )     (1,336 )     (1,873 )     (1,158 )     (1,873 )
    Tangible common equity (non-GAAP) $ 147,493     $ 143,211     $ 132,031     $ 147,493     $ 132,031  
    Average tangible common equity (non-GAAP) $ 145,305     $ 140,539     $ 132,671     $ 141,512     $ 131,425  
    GAAP earnings after income taxes   3,286       3,675       2,498       11,049       9,366  
    Amortization of intangible assets, net of tax   140       140       89       374       378  
    Tangible net income $ 3,426     $ 3,815     $ 2,587     $ 11,423     $ 9,744  
    Return on average tangible common equity (annualized)   9.38 %     10.92 %     7.74 %     10.78 %     9.91 %


    1
    Net income as adjusted and net income as adjusted per share are non-GAAP financial measures that management believes enhances investors’ ability to better understand the underlying business performance and trends related to core business activities. For a detailed reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP results, see the accompanying financial table “Reconciliation of GAAP Net Income and Net Income as Adjusted (non-GAAP)”.

    2Return on average assets as adjusted is a non-GAAP measure that management believes enhances investors’ ability to better understand the underlying business performance and trends relative to average assets. For a detailed reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP results, see the accompanying financial table “Reconciliation of Return on Average Assets as Adjusted (non-GAAP)”.

    3Return on average equity as adjusted is a non-GAAP measure that management believes enhances investors’ ability to better understand the underlying business performance and trends relative to average equity. For a detailed reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP results, see the accompanying financial table “Reconciliation of Return on Average Equity as Adjusted (non-GAAP)”.

    4Tangible book value, tangible book value per share, tangible common equity as a percent of tangible assets and return on tangible common equity are non-GAAP measures that management believes enhances investors’ ability to better understand the Company’s financial position. For a detailed reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP results, see the accompanying financial table “Reconciliation of tangible book value per share (non-GAAP)”, “Reconciliation of tangible common equity as a percent of tangible assets (non-GAAP)”, and “Reconciliation of return on average tangible common equity)”.

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI: PSB Holdings, Inc. Reports Earnings of $0.69 per Share for Q3 2024; Net Interest Margin and Tangible Book Value Increase; Asset Quality Improves

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    WAUSAU, Wis., Oct. 28, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — PSB Holdings, Inc. (“PSB”) (OTCQX: PSBQ), the holding company for Peoples State Bank (“Peoples”) serving Northcentral and Southeastern Wisconsin reported third quarter earnings ending September 30, 2024 of $0.69 per common share on net income of $2.9 million, compared to $0.56 per common share on net income of $2.3 million during the second quarter ending June 30, 2024, and $0.29 per common share on net income of $1.2 million during the third quarter ending September 30, 2023.

    PSB’s third quarter 2024 operating results reflected the following changes from the second quarter of 2024: (1) higher net interest margin increased 6 basis points; (2) slightly lower non-interest income; (3) lower non-interest expense due to the second quarter reflecting elevated severance expenses; and (4) the return of a $2.5 million non-performing loan to performing status and a corresponding release in specific reserves.

    “Over the past year, we have increased shareholders’ tangible book value per share 18.7% and paid $0.62 in dividends to our shareholders, up 12.7% from the 12 month period ended September 30, 2023. With the rapid rise in short term interest rates over the past couple of years coming to an apparent end, we expect our net interest margin to be stable and operating expenses to continue to be well managed and efficient. Additionally, as funds become available from investment and loan repayments and maturities, we expect the funds to be reinvested into higher yielding assets which should lessen the volatility in fair market value adjustments reflected in our tangible book value,” stated Scott Cattanach, President and CEO.

    September 30, 2024, Highlights:

    • Net interest income increased to $9.9 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2024, from $9.4 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2024, as increases in asset and loan yields outpaced the increases in funding costs.
    • Noninterest income decreased slightly to $1.8 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2024, compared to $1.9 million the prior quarter.
    • Noninterest expenses decreased during the quarter ended September 30, 2024, reflecting lower salary and benefit expenses. Included in salary and benefit expenses for the prior quarter were non-recurring expenses totaling approximately $404,000.
    • Tangible book value per common share increased $1.86 per share to $26.41 at September 30, 2024, compared to $24.55 one quarter earlier, and increased $4.16 per share, or 18.7%, compared to $22.25 at September 30, 2023. Additionally, PSB paid dividends totaling $0.62 per share over the past year. During the third quarter ended September 30, 2024, tangible book value per share was positively influenced by higher net income, intangible asset amortization, an increase in fair market value of investment securities and consistent stock repurchase activity.
    • Loans decreased $16.9 million in the third quarter ended September 30, 2024, to $1.06 billion largely due to not replacing certain out of market maturing loans. Allowance for credit losses increased to 1.18% of gross loans.
    • Non-performing assets declined to 0.71% of total assets at September 30, 2024 from 0.84% at June 30, 2024 as a $2.5 million loan returned to performing status.
    • Total deposits decreased $13.2 million during the quarter ended September 30, 2024 to $1.14 billion, with a large portion of the decrease attributable to a large overnight deposit held at June 30, 2024 which was withdrawn in early July.
    • Return on average tangible common equity was 10.96% for the quarter ended September 30, 2024, compared to 9.34% the prior quarter and 5.17% in the year ago quarter.

    Balance Sheet and Asset Quality Review

    Total assets decreased $9.7 million to $1.48 billion at September 30, 2024. Investment securities available for sale increased $9.7 million to $174.9 million at September 30, 2024, from $165.2 million one quarter earlier. Total collateralized liquidity available to meet cash demands was approximately $321 million at September 30, 2024, with an additional $343 million that could be raised in a short time frame from the brokered CDs market.

    Total loans receivable decreased $16.9 million to $1.06 billion at September 30, 2024, due primarily to lower commercial and construction lending. Commercial non-real estate loans decreased $9.1 million to $139.0 million at September 30, 2024, from $148.2 million one quarter earlier. Gross construction lending decreased $9.6 million to $61.0 million at September 30, 2024, from $70.5 million at June 30, 2024, while loans in process declined $3.6 million during the quarter ended September 30, 2024. Commercial real estate loans decreased $2.6 million to $541.6 million at September 30, 2024, from $544.2 million the prior quarter. Meanwhile, residential real estate loans increased slightly from the prior quarter to $341.3 million from $340.9 million. The loan portfolio remains well diversified with commercial real estate and construction loans totaling 55.4% of gross loans followed by residential real estate loans at 31.4% of gross loans, commercial non-real estate loans at 12.8% and consumer loans at 0.4%.

    The allowance for credit losses increased slightly to 1.18% of gross loans at September 30, 2024, from 1.16% the prior quarter. Annualized net charge-offs to average loans were zero for the last five quarters. Non-performing assets totaled 0.71% of total assets at September 30, 2024, compared to 0.84% at June 30, 2024. During the quarter ended September 30, 2024, a loan totaling $2.5 million was returned to performing status, while a loan on a recreation facility totaling $3.3 million was added to nonaccrual status. Additionally, one loan relationship to an equipment dealership on nonaccrual status totaling $5.1 million at June 30, 2024 was paid down to $2.8 million at September 30, 2024 on sale of the equipment inventory. For the seventh consecutive quarter, the Bank did not own any foreclosed real estate.

    Total deposits decreased $13.2 million to $1.14 billion at September 30, 2024, from $1.15 billion at June 30, 2024. The decrease in deposits reflects a $13.1 million decrease in interest-bearing demand and savings deposits, a $19.7 million decrease in money market deposits partially offset by a $14.6 million increase in non-interest bearing deposits and a $5.4 million increase in retail and local time deposits. The decrease in money market deposits reflected a large deposit of $49 million on June 30, 2024 that was drawn down in early July 2024.

    At September 30, 2024, non-interest bearing demand deposits increased to 23.3% of total deposits from 21.6% the prior quarter, while interest-bearing demand and savings deposits decreased to 28.4% of deposits, compared to 29.3% at June 30, 2024. Uninsured and uncollateralized deposits decreased to 21.6% of total deposits at September 30, 2024, from 24.0% of total deposits at June 30, 2024.

    FHLB advances decreased to $181.3 million at September 30, 2024, compared to $184.9 million at June 30, 2024.

    Tangible stockholder equity as a percent of total tangible assets increased to 7.85% at September 30, 2024, compared to 7.32% at June 30, 2024, and 6.98% at September 30, 2023.

    Tangible net book value per common share increased $4.16, to $26.41, at September 30, 2024, compared to $22.25 one year earlier, an increase of 18.7% after dividends of $0.62 were paid to shareholders. Relative to the prior quarter, tangible net book value per common share increased due to continued earnings, a fair market value increase in the investment portfolio which reduced unrealized losses reflected in accumulated other comprehensive income and amortization of intangible assets. The accumulated other comprehensive loss on the investment portfolio was $15.8 million at September 30, 2024, compared to $20.5 million one quarter earlier.

    Operations Review

    Net interest income increased to $9.9 million (on a net margin of 2.90%) for the third quarter of 2024, from $9.4 million (on a net margin of 2.84%) for the second quarter of 2024, and $9.6 million (on a net margin of 2.88%) for the third quarter of 2023. Earning asset yields increased by 8 basis points to 5.29% during the third quarter of 2024 from 5.21% during the second quarter of 2024, while interest bearing deposit and borrowing costs increased 7 basis points to 3.13% compared to 3.06% during the second quarter of 2024.

    The increase in earning asset yields was primarily due to higher yields on loan originations and renewals. Loan yields increased during the third quarter of 2024 to 5.78% from 5.67% for the second quarter of 2024, up 11 basis points. Taxable security yields were 3.01% for the quarter ended September 30, 2024, compared to 3.02% for the quarter ended June 30, 2024, while tax-exempt security yields were 3.31% for the quarter ended September 30, 2024 compared to 3.33% the prior quarter.

    The cost of all deposits was 2.11% for the quarter ended September 30, 2024, compared to 2.11% the prior quarter, while the overall cost of funds increased 7 basis points from 3.06% to 3.13% during the same time period. Deposit costs for money market deposits decreased during the quarter ended September 30, 2024, to 2.69% from 2.72% the prior quarter. The cost of time deposits and FHLB advances continued to increase and were primarily responsible for the rise in the Bank’s cost of funds in the current quarter. The cost of time deposits increased to 4.04% for the third quarter ended September 30, 2024, from 3.97% the prior quarter. FHLB advance costs rose to 4.44% during the third quarter ended September 30, 2024, from 4.28% the prior quarter.

    Total noninterest income decreased slightly for the third quarter of 2024 to $1.84 million, from $1.91 million for the second quarter of 2024. Mortgage banking income remained at $433,000 in the September 30, 2024 quarter while various decreases in nominal revenue sources accounted for the slight decline in non-interest income during the third quarter ended September 30, 2024. At September 30, 2024, the Bank serviced $371 million in secondary market residential mortgage loans for others which provide fee income.

    Noninterest expenses decreased to $8.2 million for the third quarter of 2024, compared to $8.4 million for the second quarter of 2024. The second quarter ended June 30, 2024, reflected higher salary and benefit expenses related to non-recurring costs. Relative to one year earlier, salary and benefit cost increased 5.7% to $4.8 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2024, compared to $4.5 million for the third quarter ended September 30, 2023.

    Taxes increased $183,000 during the third quarter to $593,000, from $410,000 one quarter earlier. The increase generally reflects higher pre-tax income. The effective tax rate for the quarter ended September 30, 2024, was 16.6% compared to 14.4% for the second quarter ended June 30, 2024, and 63.8% for the third quarter ended September 30, 2023, when higher tax expenses were incurred to recognize the loss of certain deferred tax assets following a change in Wisconsin tax law that eliminated state taxes on certain qualified assets.

    About PSB Holdings, Inc.

    PSB Holdings, Inc. is the parent company of Peoples State Bank. Peoples is a community bank headquartered in Wausau, Wisconsin, serving northcentral and southeastern Wisconsin from twelve full-service banking locations in Marathon, Oneida, Vilas, Portage, Milwaukee and Waukesha counties and a loan production office in Dane County. Peoples also provides investment and insurance products, along with retirement planning services, through Peoples Wealth Management, a division of Peoples. PSB Holdings, Inc. is traded under the stock symbol PSBQ on the OTCQX Market. More information about PSB, its management, and its financial performance may be found at www.psbholdingsinc.com

    Forward-Looking Statements

    This press release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements are based on current expectations, estimates and projections about PSB’s business based, in part, on assumptions made by management and include, without limitation, statements with respect to the potential growth of PSB, its future profits, expected stock repurchase levels, future dividend rates, future interest rates, and the adequacy of its capital position. Forward-looking statements can be affected by known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors, including, but not limited to, strength of the economy, the effects of government policies, including interest rate policies, risks associated with the execution of PSB’s vision and growth strategy, including with respect to current and future M&A activity, and risks associated with global economic instability. The forward-looking statements in this press release speak only as of the date on which they are made and PSB does not undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this release.

                

    PSB Holdings, Inc.          
    Consolidated Balance Sheets          
    September 30, June 30, and March 31, 2024, September 30, 2023, unaudited, December 31, 2023 derived from audited financial statements
               
      Sep. 30, Jun. 30, Mar. 31, Dec. 31, Sep. 30,
    (dollars in thousands, except per share data)   2024     2024     2024     2023     2023  
               
    Assets          
               
    Cash and due from banks $ 23,554   $ 16,475   $ 13,340   $ 20,887   $ 12,881  
    Interest-bearing deposits   5,126     251     105     1,431     668  
    Federal funds sold   58,434     69,249     2,439     5,462     7,764  
               
    Cash and cash equivalents   87,114     85,975     15,884     27,780     21,313  
    Securities available for sale (at fair value)   174,911     165,177     165,566     164,024     160,883  
    Securities held to maturity (fair values of $82,389, $79,993, $81,234, $82,514 and        
      $75,236 respectively)   86,847     86,825     87,104     87,081     86,908  
    Equity securities   1,752     1,661     1,474     1,474     2,273  
    Loans held for sale       2,268     865     230     971  
    Loans receivable, net (allowance for credit losses of $12,598, $12,597, $12,494,        
     $12,302 and $12,267 respectively)   1,057,974     1,074,844     1,081,394     1,078,475     1,098,019  
    Accrued interest receivable   4,837     5,046     5,467     5,136     4,716  
    Foreclosed assets                    
    Premises and equipment, net   14,065     14,048     13,427     13,098     13,242  
    Mortgage servicing rights, net   1,727     1,688     1,657     1,664     1,684  
    Federal Home Loan Bank stock (at cost)   8,825     8,825     7,006     6,373     6,373  
    Cash surrender value of bank-owned life insurance   24,565     24,401     24,242     24,085     23,931  
    Core deposit intangible   212     229     249     273     297  
    Goodwill   2,541     2,541     2,541     2,541     2,541  
    Other assets   10,598     12,111     11,682     11,866     14,094  
               
    TOTAL ASSETS $ 1,475,968   $ 1,485,639   $ 1,418,558   $ 1,424,100   $ 1,437,245  
               
    Liabilities          
               
    Non-interest-bearing deposits $ 265,078   $ 250,435   $ 247,608   $ 266,829   $ 288,765  
    Interest-bearing deposits   874,035     901,886     865,744     874,973     883,474  
               
       Total deposits   1,139,113     1,152,321     1,113,352     1,141,802     1,172,239  
               
    Federal Home Loan Bank advances   181,250     184,900     158,250     134,000     128,000  
    Other borrowings   6,128     5,775     8,096     8,058     5,660  
    Senior subordinated notes   4,779     4,778     4,776     4,774     4,772  
    Junior subordinated debentures   12,998     12,972     12,947     12,921     12,896  
    Allowance for credit losses on unfunded commitments   477     477     477     577     512  
    Accrued expenses and other liabilities   12,850     13,069     10,247     12,681     10,258  
               
       Total liabilities   1,357,595     1,374,292     1,308,145     1,314,813     1,334,337  
               
    Stockholders’ equity          
               
    Preferred stock – no par value:          
       Authorized – 30,000 shares; no shares issued or outstanding          
       Outstanding – 7,200 shares, respectively   7,200     7,200     7,200     7,200     7,200  
    Common stock – no par value with a stated value of $1.00 per share:          
       Authorized – 18,000,000 shares; Issued – 5,490,798 shares          
       Outstanding – 4,105,594, 4,128,382, 4,147,649, 4,164,735 and          
         4,174,197 shares, respectively   1,830     1,830     1,830     1,830     1,830  
    Additional paid-in capital   8,567     8,527     8,466     8,460     8,421  
    Retained earnings   138,142     135,276     134,271     132,666     131,624  
    Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax   (15,814 )   (20,503 )   (20,775 )   (20,689 )   (26,190 )
    Treasury stock, at cost – 1,385,204, 1,362,416, 1,343,149, 1,326,063 and          
      1,316,601 shares, respectively   (21,552 )   (20,983 )   (20,579 )   (20,180 )   (19,977 )
               
       Total stockholders’ equity   118,373     111,347     110,413     109,287     102,908  
               
    TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY $ 1,475,968   $ 1,485,639   $ 1,418,558   $ 1,424,100   $ 1,437,245  
               
    PSB Holdings, Inc.                
    Consolidated Statements of Income                
                          Quarter Ended     Nine Months Ended
    (dollars in thousands, Sep. 30, Jun. 30, Mar. 31, Dec. 31, Sep. 30,   September
    except per share data – unaudited) 2024 2024 2024   2023   2023   2024 2023
                     
    Interest and dividend income:                
       Loans, including fees $ 15,634 $ 15,433 $ 15,109   $ 14,888   $ 14,263   $ 46,176   $ 38,745  
       Securities:                
          Taxable   1,345   1,295   1,197     1,147     1,114     3,837     3,772  
          Tax-exempt   522   521   526     532     533     1,569     1,605  
       Other interest and dividends   699   265   343     320     238     1,307     531  
                     
             Total interest and dividend income   18,200   17,514   17,175     16,887     16,148     52,889     44,653  
                     
    Interest expense:                
       Deposits   5,905   5,838   6,082     5,526     4,817     17,825     11,467  
       FHLB advances   2,038   1,860   1,450     1,349     1,321     5,348     3,068  
       Other borrowings   57   58   60     54     51     175     161  
       Senior subordinated notes   59   58   59     59     59     176     179  
       Junior subordinated debentures   252   255   251     254     255     758     731  
                     
             Total interest expense   8,311   8,069   7,902     7,242     6,503     24,282     15,606  
                     
    Net interest income   9,889   9,445   9,273     9,645     9,645     28,607     29,047  
    Provision for credit losses     100   95     100     150     195     350  
                     
    Net interest income after provision for credit losses   9,889   9,345   9,178     9,545     9,495     28,412     28,697  
                     
    Noninterest income:                
       Service fees   367   350   336     360     349     1,053     1,088  
       Mortgage banking income   433   433   308     247     345     1,174     981  
       Investment and insurance sales commissions   230   222   121     100     158     573     810  
       Net loss on sale of securities       (495 )   (297 )       (495 )   (279 )
       Increase in cash surrender value of life insurance   165   159   157     154     155     481     461  
       Life insurance death benefit                       533  
       Other noninterest income   648   742   617     540     675     2,007     2,022  
                     
             Total noninterest income   1,843   1,906   1,044     1,104     1,682     4,793     5,616  
                     
    Noninterest expense:                
       Salaries and employee benefits   4,771   5,167   5,123     4,244     4,514     15,061     14,404  
       Occupancy and facilities   757   733   721     675     689     2,211     2,086  
       Loss (gain) on foreclosed assets   1         1         1     (46 )
       Data processing and other office operations   1,104   1,047   1,022     1,001     953     3,173     2,784  
       Advertising and promotion   164   171   129     244     161     464     489  
       Core deposit intangible amortization   17   20   24     24     24     61     85  
       Other noninterest expenses   1,337   1,257   1,306     1,169     1,113     3,900     3,388  
                     
            Total noninterest expense   8,151   8,395   8,325     7,358     7,454     24,871     23,190  
                     
    Income before provision for income taxes   3,581   2,856   1,897     3,291     3,723     8,334     11,123  
    Provision for income taxes   593   410   169     878     2,374     1,172     3,967  
                     
    Net income $ 2,988 $ 2,446 $ 1,728   $ 2,413   $ 1,349   $ 7,162   $ 7,156  
    Preferred stock dividends declared $ 122 $ 122 $ 122   $ 122   $ 122   $ 366   $ 366  
                     
    Net income available to common shareholders $ 2,866 $ 2,324 $ 1,606   $ 2,291   $ 1,227   $ 6,796   $ 6,790  
    Basic earnings per common share $ 0.69 $ 0.56 $ 0.39   $ 0.55   $ 0.29   $ 1.64   $ 1.61  
    Diluted earnings per common share $ 0.69 $ 0.56 $ 0.39   $ 0.55   $ 0.29   $ 1.64   $ 1.61  
                     
    PSB Holdings, Inc.          
    Quarterly Financial Summary          
    (dollars in thousands, except per share data) Quarter ended
        Sep. 30, Jun. 30, Mar. 31, Dec. 31, Sep. 30,
    Earnings and dividends:   2024     2024     2024     2023     2023  
                 
      Interest income $ 18,200   $ 17,514   $ 17,175   $ 16,887   $ 16,148  
      Interest expense $ 8,311   $ 8,069   $ 7,902   $ 7,242   $ 6,503  
      Net interest income $ 9,889   $ 9,445   $ 9,273   $ 9,645   $ 9,645  
      Provision for credit losses $   $ 100   $ 95   $ 100   $ 150  
      Other noninterest income $ 1,843   $ 1,906   $ 1,044   $ 1,104   $ 1,682  
      Other noninterest expense $ 8,151   $ 8,395   $ 8,325   $ 7,358   $ 7,454  
      Net income available to common shareholders $ 2,866   $ 2,324   $ 1,606   $ 2,291   $ 1,227  
                 
      Basic earnings per common share (3) $ 0.69   $ 0.56   $ 0.39   $ 0.55   $ 0.29  
      Diluted earnings per common share (3) $ 0.69   $ 0.56   $ 0.39   $ 0.55   $ 0.29  
      Dividends declared per common share (3) $   $ 0.32   $   $ 0.30   $  
      Tangible net book value per common share (4) $ 26.41   $ 24.55   $ 24.21   $ 23.84   $ 22.25  
                 
      Semi-annual dividend payout ratio n/a   33.60 % n/a   38.14 % n/a
      Average common shares outstanding   4,132,218     4,139,456     4,154,702     4,168,924     4,186,940  
                 
                 
    Balance sheet – average balances:          
      Loans receivable, net of allowances for credit loss $ 1,066,795   $ 1,088,013   $ 1,081,936   $ 1,081,851   $ 1,076,158  
      Assets $ 1,445,613   $ 1,433,749   $ 1,429,437   $ 1,424,240   $ 1,425,522  
      Deposits $ 1,110,854   $ 1,111,240   $ 1,138,010   $ 1,148,399   $ 1,149,624  
      Stockholders’ equity $ 114,458   $ 110,726   $ 109,473   $ 105,060   $ 105,745  
                 
                 
    Performance ratios:          
      Return on average assets (1)   0.82 %   0.69 %   0.49 %   0.67 %   0.38 %
      Return on average common stockholders’ equity (1)   10.63 %   9.03 %   6.32 %   9.29 %   4.94 %
      Return on average tangible common          
        stockholders’ equity (1)(4)   10.96 %   9.34 %   6.57 %   9.64 %   5.17 %
      Net loan charge-offs to average loans (1)   0.00 %   0.00 %   0.00 %   0.00 %   0.00 %
      Nonperforming loans to gross loans   0.97 %   1.15 %   1.08 %   0.54 %   0.55 %
      Nonperforming assets to total assets   0.71 %   0.84 %   0.83 %   0.42 %   0.42 %
      Allowance for credit losses to gross loans   1.18 %   1.16 %   1.14 %   1.13 %   1.10 %
      Nonperforming assets to tangible equity          
        plus the allowance for credit losses (4)   8.71 %   11.09 %   10.59 %   5.38 %   5.87 %
      Net interest rate margin (1)(2)   2.90 %   2.84 %   2.80 %   2.88 %   2.88 %
      Net interest rate spread (1)(2)   2.16 %   2.15 %   2.12 %   2.20 %   2.27 %
      Service fee revenue as a percent of          
        average demand deposits (1)   0.56 %   0.56 %   0.54 %   0.52 %   0.50 %
      Noninterest income as a percent          
        of gross revenue   9.20 %   9.81 %   5.73 %   6.14 %   9.43 %
      Efficiency ratio (2)   68.43 %   72.52 %   78.93 %   67.04 %   64.58 %
      Noninterest expenses to average assets (1)   2.24 %   2.35 %   2.34 %   2.05 %   2.07 %
      Average stockholders’ equity less accumulated          
        other comprehensive income (loss) to          
        average assets   9.06 %   9.03 %   8.98 %   8.88 %   9.00 %
      Tangible equity to tangible assets (4)   7.85 %   7.32 %   7.60 %   7.49 %   6.98 %
                 
    Stock price information:          
                 
      High $ 25.00   $ 21.40   $ 22.50   $ 22.30   $ 22.50  
      Low $ 20.30   $ 19.75   $ 20.05   $ 20.10   $ 20.35  
      Last trade value at quarter-end $ 25.00   $ 20.40   $ 21.25   $ 22.11   $ 21.15  
                 
    (1) Annualized          
    (2) The yield on federally tax-exempt loans and securities is computed on a tax-equivalent basis using a federal tax rate of 21%.
    (3) Due to rounding, cumulative quarterly per share performance may not equal annual per share totals.  
    (4) Tangible stockholders’ equity excludes goodwill and core deposit intangibles.      
           
    PSB Holdings, Inc.          
    Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income        
                     
            Quarter Ended
            Sep. 30, Jun. 30, Mar. 31, Dec. 31, Sep. 30,
    (dollars in thousands – unaudited)   2024     2024     2024     2023     2023  
                     
    Net income $ 2,988   $ 2,446   $ 1,728   $ 2,413   $ 1,349  
                     
    Other comprehensive income, net of tax:          
                     
      Unrealized gain (loss) on securities available        
        for sale   4,738     184     (615 )   5,278     (3,085 )
                     
      Reclassification adjustment for security          
        loss included in net income           391     280      
                     
      Accretion of unrealized loss included in net          
        income on securities available for sale          
        deferred tax adjustment for Wisconsin          
        Act 19           (35 )        
                     
      Amortization of unrealized loss included in net        
        income on securities available for sale          
        transferred to securities held to maturity   90     89     91     91     91  
                     
      Unrealized gain (loss) on interest rate swap   (101 )   39     123     (109 )   79  
                     
      Reclassification adjustment of interest rate          
        swap settlements included in earnings   (38 )   (40 )   (41 )   (39 )   (35 )
                     
                     
    Other comprehensive income (loss)   4,689     272     (86 )   5,501     (2,950 )
                     
    Comprehensive income (loss) $ 7,677   $ 2,718   $ 1,642   $ 7,914   $ (1,601 )
                     

       

    PSB Holdings, Inc.          
    Nonperforming Assets as of:          
      Sep 30, Jun 30, Mar 31, Dec 31, Sep 30,
    (dollars in thousands)   2024     2024     2024     2023     2023  
               
    Nonaccrual loans (excluding restructured loans) $ 10,116   $ 12,184   $ 11,498   $ 5,596   $ 5,807  
    Nonaccrual restructured loans   25     28     30     34     42  
    Restructured loans not on nonaccrual   292     299     304     310     256  
    Accruing loans past due 90 days or more                    
               
    Total nonperforming loans   10,433     12,511     11,832     5,940     6,105  
    Other real estate owned                    
               
    Total nonperforming assets $ 10,433   $ 12,511   $ 11,832   $ 5,940   $ 6,105  
               
    Nonperforming loans as a % of gross loans receivable   0.97 %   1.15 %   1.08 %   0.54 %   0.55 %
    Total nonperforming assets as a % of total assets   0.71 %   0.84 %   0.83 %   0.42 %   0.42 %
    Allowance for credit losses as a % of nonperforming loans   120.75 %   100.69 %   105.59 %   207.10 %   200.93 %
               
    PSB Holdings, Inc.      
    Nonperforming Assets >= $500,000 net book value before specific reserves    
    At September 30, 2024      
    (dollars in thousands)      
        Gross Specific
    Collateral Description Asset Type Principal Reserves
           
    Real estate – Recreation Facility Nonaccrual $ 3,291   $  
    Real estate – Independent Auto Repair Nonaccrual   562      
    Real estate – Equipment Dealership Nonaccrual   2,808     660  
           
           
    Total listed nonperforming assets   $ 6,661   $ 660  
    Total bank wide nonperforming assets   $ 10,433   $ 1,220  
    Listed assets as a % of total nonperforming assets     64 %   54 %
           
    PSB Holding, Inc.          
    Loan Composition by Collateral Type          
    Quarter-ended (dollars in thousands) Sep 30, 2024 Jun 30, 2024 Mar 31, 2024 Dec 31, 2023 Sep 30, 2023
               
    Commercial:          
    Commercial and industrial $ 115,234   $ 125,508   $ 118,821   $ 117,207   $ 138,299  
    Agriculture   11,203     11,480     12,081     12,304     12,464  
    Municipal   12,596     11,190     28,842     31,530     27,186  
               
    Total Commercial   139,033     148,178     159,744     161,041     177,949  
               
    Commercial Real Estate:          
    Commercial real estate   541,577     544,171     546,257     536,209     539,488  
    Construction and development   60,952     70,540     63,375     81,701     86,456  
               
    Total Commercial Real Estate   602,529     614,711     609,632     617,910     625,944  
               
    Residential real estate:          
    Residential   269,954     270,944     274,300     274,453     274,632  
    Construction and development   34,655     36,129     34,158     33,960     33,141  
    HELOC   36,734     33,838     31,357     29,766     29,044  
               
    Total Residential Real Estate   341,343     340,911     339,815     338,179     336,817  
               
    Consumer installment   4,770     4,423     4,867     4,357     4,350  
               
    Subtotals – Gross loans   1,087,675     1,108,223     1,114,058     1,121,487     1,145,060  
    Loans in process of disbursement   (17,836 )   (21,484 )   (20,839 )   (31,359 )   (35,404 )
               
    Subtotals – Disbursed loans   1,069,839     1,086,739     1,093,219     1,090,128     1,109,656  
    Net deferred loan costs   733     702     669     649     630  
    Allowance for credit losses   (12,598 )   (12,597 )   (12,494 )   (12,302 )   (12,267 )
               
    Total loans receivable $ 1,057,974   $ 1,074,844   $ 1,081,394   $ 1,078,475   $ 1,098,019  
               
    PSB Holding, Inc.                            
    Selected Commercial Real Estate Loans by Purpose                    
      Sept 30,   June 30,   Mar 31,   Dec 31,   Sept 30,
     (dollars in thousands)   2024       2024       2024       2023       2023  
                                 
      Total Exposure % of Portfolio (1)   Total Exposure % of Portfolio (1)   Total Exposure % of Portfolio (1)   Total Exposure % of Portfolio (1)   Total Exposure % of Portfolio (1)
    Multi Family $ 140,307 14.7 %   $ 146,873 15.2 %   $ 142,001 14.4 %   $ 132,386 13.2 %   $ 133,466 13.3 %
    Industrial and Warehousing   86,818 9.1       86,025 8.9       85,409 8.6       83,817 8.3       88,906 8.9  
    Retail   33,020 3.5       34,846 3.6       33,177 3.4       35,419 3.5       35,281 3.5  
    Hotels   31,611 3.3       34,613 3.6       35,105 3.6       36,100 3.6       31,819 3.2  
    Office   6,378 0.7       6,518 0.7       6,655 0.7       6,701 0.7       6,746 0.7  
                                 
    (1) Percentage of commercial and commercial real estate portfolio and commitments.              
                   
    PSB Holdings, Inc.                    
    Deposit Composition                    
                         
    Insured and Collateralized Deposits September 30, June 30, March 31, December 31, September 30,
    (dollars in thousands)   2024     2024     2024     2023     2023  
      $ % $ % $ % $ % $ %
                         
    Non-interest bearing demand $ 210,534 18.6 % $ 202,343 17.5 % $ 199,076 17.8 % $ 197,571 17.3 % $ 209,133 17.9 %
    Interest-bearing demand and savings   305,631 26.8 %   304,392 26.5 %   318,673 28.7 %   317,984 27.8 %   307,620 26.3 %
    Money market deposits   138,376 12.2 %   137,637 12.0 %   143,167 12.9 %   142,887 12.5 %   135,910 11.4 %
    Retail and local time deposits <= $250   155,988 13.7 %   149,298 13.0 %   148,404 13.3 %   149,145 13.1 %   144,738 12.4 %
                         
    Total core deposits   810,529 71.3 %   793,670 69.0 %   809,320 72.7 %   807,587 70.7 %   797,401 68.0 %
    Retail and local time deposits > $250   23,500 2.1 %   22,500 2.0 %   24,508 2.3 %   23,000 2.0 %   22,750 1.9 %
    Broker & national time deposits <= $250   1,241 0.1 %   1,490 0.1 %   2,229 0.2 %   3,470 0.3 %   3,222 0.3 %
    Broker & national time deposits > $250   56,164 4.9 %   56,328 4.9 %   61,752 5.5 %   70,020 6.1 %   88,614 7.6 %
                         
    Totals $ 891,434 78.4 % $ 873,988 76.0 % $ 897,809 80.7 % $ 904,077 79.1 % $ 911,987 77.8 %
                         
    PSB Holdings, Inc.                    
    Deposit Composition                    
                         
    Uninsured Deposits September 30, June 30, March 31, December 31, September 30,
    (dollars in thousands)   2024     2024     2024     2023     2023  
      $ % $ % $ % $ % $ %
                         
    Non-interest bearing demand $ 54,544 4.7 % $ 48,092 4.1 % $ 48,532 4.4 % $ 69,258 6.1 % $ 79,632 6.8 %
    Interest-bearing demand and savings   18,317 1.6 %   32,674 2.8 %   20,535 1.8 %   20,316 1.8 %   22,847 1.9 %
    Money market deposits   157,489 13.8 %   177,954 15.4 %   124,766 11.2 %   124,518 10.9 %   133,653 11.4 %
    Retail and local time deposits <= $250   0.0 %   0.0 %   0.0 %   0.0 %   0.0 %
                         
    Total core deposits   230,350 20.1 %   258,720 22.3 %   193,833 17.4 %   214,092 18.8 %   236,132 20.1 %
    Retail and local time deposits > $250   17,329 1.5 %   19,613 1.7 %   21,710 1.9 %   23,633 2.1 %   24,120 2.1 %
    Broker & national time deposits <= $250   0.0 %   0.0 %   0.0 %   0.0 %   0.0 %
    Broker & national time deposits > $250   0.0 %   0.0 %   0.0 %   0.0 %   0.0 %
                         
    Totals $ 247,679 21.6 % $ 278,333 24.0 % $ 215,543 19.3 % $ 237,725 20.9 % $ 260,252 22.2 %
                         
    PSB Holdings, Inc.                    
    Deposit Composition                    
                         
    Total Deposits September 30, June 30, March 31, December 31, September 30,
    (dollars in thousands)   2024     2024     2024     2023     2023  
      $ % $ % $ % $ % $ %
                         
    Non-interest bearing demand $ 265,078 23.3 % $ 250,435 21.6 % $ 247,608 22.2 % $ 266,829 23.4 % $ 288,765 24.7 %
    Interest-bearing demand and savings   323,948 28.4 %   337,066 29.3 %   339,208 30.5 %   338,300 29.6 %   330,467 28.2 %
    Money market deposits   295,865 26.0 %   315,591 27.4 %   267,933 24.1 %   267,405 23.4 %   269,563 22.8 %
    Retail and local time deposits <= $250   155,988 13.7 %   149,298 13.0 %   148,404 13.3 %   149,145 13.1 %   144,738 12.4 %
                         
    Total core deposits   1,040,879 91.4 %   1,052,390 91.3 %   1,003,153 90.1 %   1,021,679 89.5 %   1,033,533 88.1 %
    Retail and local time deposits > $250   40,829 3.6 %   42,113 3.7 %   46,218 4.2 %   46,633 4.1 %   46,870 4.0 %
    Broker & national time deposits <= $250   1,241 0.1 %   1,490 0.1 %   2,229 0.2 %   3,470 0.3 %   3,222 0.3 %
    Broker & national time deposits > $250   56,164 4.9 %   56,328 4.9 %   61,752 5.5 %   70,020 6.1 %   88,614 7.6 %
                         
    Totals $ 1,139,113 100.0 % $ 1,152,321 100.0 % $ 1,113,352 100.0 % $ 1,141,802 100.0 % $ 1,172,239 100.0 %
                         
    PSB Holdings, Inc.                      
    Average Balances ($000) and Interest Rates                  
    (dollars in thousands)                      
                           
      Quarter ended September 30, 2024   Quarter ended June 30, 2024   Quarter ended September 30, 2023
      Average   Yield /   Average   Yield /   Average   Yield /
      Balance Interest Rate   Balance Interest Rate   Balance Interest Rate
    Assets                      
    Interest-earning assets:                      
       Loans (1)(2) $ 1,079,393   $ 15,674 5.78 %   $ 1,100,518   $ 15,520 5.67 %   $ 1,088,137   $ 14,337 5.23 %
       Taxable securities   177,520     1,345 3.01 %     172,563     1,295 3.02 %     173,287     1,114 2.55 %
       Tax-exempt securities (2)   79,472     661 3.31 %     79,564     659 3.33 %     81,327     675 3.29 %
       FHLB stock   8,825     176 7.93 %     7,931     182 9.23 %     6,368     127 7.91 %
       Other   36,680     523 5.67 %     8,241     83 4.05 %     8,195     111 5.37 %
                           
       Total (2)   1,381,890     18,379 5.29 %     1,368,817     17,739 5.21 %     1,357,314     16,364 4.78 %
                           
    Non-interest-earning assets:                    
       Cash and due from banks   17,162           17,345           19,299      
       Premises and equipment,                    
          net   14,216           13,930           13,266      
       Cash surrender value ins   24,458           24,297           23,840      
       Other assets   20,485           21,865           23,782      
       Allowance for credit                      
          losses   (12,598 )         (12,505 )         (11,979 )    
                           
       Total $ 1,445,613     $ 1,433,749     $ 1,425,522  
                           
    Liabilities & stockholders’ equity                    
    Interest-bearing liabilities:                    
       Savings and demand                      
          deposits $ 323,841   $ 1,515 1.86 %   $ 331,740   $ 1,467 1.78 %   $ 335,214   $ 1,198 1.42 %
       Money market deposits   277,884     1,876 2.69 %     271,336     1,835 2.72 %     255,823     1,489 2.31 %
       Time deposits   247,296     2,514 4.04 %     257,006     2,536 3.97 %     279,971     2,130 3.02 %
       FHLB borrowings   182,414     2,038 4.44 %     174,596     1,860 4.28 %     134,386     1,321 3.90 %
       Other borrowings   6,702     57 3.38 %     6,870     58 3.40 %     5,681     51 3.56 %
     Senior sub. notes   4,779     59 4.91 %     4,777     58 4.88 %     4,772     59 4.91 %
       Junior sub. debentures   12,985     252 7.72 %     12,960     255 7.91 %     12,883     255 7.85 %
                           
       Total   1,055,901     8,311 3.13 %     1,059,285     8,069 3.06 %     1,028,730     6,503 2.51 %
                           
    Non-interest-bearing liabilities:                    
       Demand deposits   261,833           251,158           278,616      
       Other liabilities   13,421           12,580           12,431      
       Stockholders’ equity   114,458           110,726           105,745      
                           
       Total $ 1,445,613     $ 1,433,749     $ 1,425,522  
                           
    Net interest income   $ 10,068       $ 9,670       $ 9,861  
    Rate spread     2.16 %       2.15 %       2.27 %
    Net yield on interest-earning assets   2.90 %       2.84 %       2.88 %
                           
    (1) Nonaccrual loans are included in the daily average loan balances outstanding.          
    (2) The yield on federally tax-exempt loans and securities is computed on a tax-equivalent basis using a federal tax rate of 21%.  
                           
    PSB Holdings, Inc.              
    Average Balances ($000) and Interest Rates          
    (dollars in thousands)              
        Nine months ended September 30, 2024   Nine months ended September 30, 2023
        Average   Yield/   Average   Yield/
        Balance Interest Rate   Balance Interest Rate
    Assets              
    Interest-earning assets:              
       Loans (1)(2) $ 1,091,366   $ 46,393 5.68 %   $ 1,025,955   $ 38,851 5.06 %
       Taxable securities   173,971     3,837 2.95 %     189,583     3,772 2.66 %
       Tax-exempt securities (2)   79,822     1,986 3.32 %     81,670     2,032 3.33 %
       FHLB stock   7,755     523 9.01 %     4,943     228 6.17 %
       Other   18,804     784 5.57 %     8,154     303 4.97 %
                     
       Total (2)   1,371,718     53,523 5.21 %     1,310,305     45,186 4.61 %
                     
    Non-interest-earning assets:              
       Cash and due from banks   17,291           17,403      
       Premises and equipment,              
          net   13,778           13,311      
       Cash surrender value ins   24,301           24,446      
       Other assets   21,146           23,364      
       Allowance for credit              
          losses   (12,496 )         (12,004 )    
                     
       Total $ 1,435,738     $ 1,376,825  
                     
    Liabilities & stockholders’ equity            
    Interest-bearing liabilities:              
       Savings and demand              
          deposits $ 335,317   $ 4,654 1.85 %   $ 350,928   $ 3,286 1.25 %
       Money market deposits   274,405     5,608 2.73 %     241,594     3,508 1.94 %
       Time deposits   256,287     7,563 3.94 %     257,639     4,673 2.43 %
       FHLB borrowings   166,703     5,348 4.29 %     110,460     3,068 3.71 %
       Other borrowings   7,373     175 3.17 %     7,082     161 3.04 %
       Senior sub. notes   4,778     176 4.92 %     4,965     179 4.82 %
       Junior sub. debentures   12,972     758 7.81 %     12,857     731 7.60 %
                     
       Total   1,057,835     24,282 3.07 %     985,525     15,606 2.12 %
                     
    Non-interest-bearing liabilities:            
       Demand deposits   254,134           273,699      
       Other liabilities   12,720           12,165      
       Stockholders’ equity   111,049           105,436      
                     
       Total $ 1,435,738     $ 1,376,825  
                     
    Net interest income   $ 29,241       $ 29,580  
    Rate spread     2.14 %       2.49 %
    Net yield on interest-earning assets   2.85 %       3.02 %
                     
    (1) Nonaccrual loans are included in the daily average loan balances outstanding.    
    (2) The yield on federally tax-exempt loans and securities is computed on a tax-equivalent basis using a federal tax rate of 21%.
                     

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI: cBrain lowers expected yearly revenue growth to 10-15%, but maintains EBT margin of 24-28%

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Company Announcement no. 10/2024

    cBrain lowers expected yearly revenue growth to 10-15%, but maintains EBT margin of 24-28%

    Copenhagen, November 28, 2024

    cBrain (NASDAQ: CBRAIN) is executing its international growth plan with a financial goal of reaching total revenue of 350 million DKK in 2025. This goal is anchored in two primary revenue streams, referred to as “Base” and “Stepping stones”. 

    The “Base” stream aims to achieve annual revenue growth of 10-15% by strengthening and expanding existing operations and customer relationships. In parallel, the “Stepping Stones” initiative aims to lift annual revenue growth to 30%, by increasing contract values and winning larger international contracts.

    cBrain continues to execute its growth strategy, building a robust pipeline of major opportunities. This is facilitated by a growing number of international pilot projects that set the stage for significant “Stepping Stones” achievements.

    In early 2024, cBrain anticipated some of these opportunities, particularly in Germany and the U.S., to yield significant revenue in the second half of the year. cBrain remains highly active in these pursuits and has added further opportunities during the year.

    However, not unusually with larger government procurement, delays in decision making mean that cBrain estimates less than a 50% likelihood of substantial revenue from larger international projects materializing in Q4. Consequently, cBrain adjusts its 2024 revenue growth forecast to 10-15%, down from the initial estimate of 20-25%.

    In alignment with business planning, cBrain has earmarked financial investments to support “Stepping Stones” projects in Germany and the U.S. Since these projects have not yet materialized, these reserved funds have not been deployed. This provides a positive impact on earnings. cBrain, therefore, maintains its EBT (Earnings Before Tax) guidance at 24-30%.

    Larger international projects are often structured so that F2 standard software licenses form the majority of the contract value. Due to financial standards for software revenue recognition, larger international orders may, as a result, introduce greater variability in revenue patterns over time.

    As cBrain is currently pursuing global opportunities across the USA, Europe, Africa, the UAE, and India, some of these opportunities may still materialize during the fourth quarter, with a positive affect on this year’s revenue.

    Best regards

    Per Tejs Knudsen, CEO

    Inquiries regarding this Company Announcement may be directed to

    Ejvind Jørgensen, CFO & Head of Investor Relations, cBrain A/S, ir@cbrain.com, +45 2594 4973

    Attachment

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: FIFA/Saudi Arabia: Global law firm’s flawed human rights assessment of Saudi Arabia’s World Cup 2034 bid raises ‘deep concern’

    Source: Amnesty International –

    AS&H Clifford Chance’s assessment contains no substantive discussion of Saudi’s extensive and relevant abuses

    11 human rights groups, football supporters and worker organisations join forces to voice deep concern

    ‘FIFA must insist on a proper assessment and meaningful human rights strategy or its flagship tournament will be tarnished by severe human rights violations’ – Steve Cockburn

    A flawed human rights assessment of Saudi Arabia’s FIFA 2034 World Cup bid by AS&H Clifford Chance – part of the global partnership of London-based law firm Clifford Chance – leaves the global firm at risk of being linked to abuses which result from the tournament, 11 organisations said today.

    AS&H Clifford Chance, which is based in Riyadh and sits within Clifford Chance’s integrated global partnership, produced an “independent human rights context assessment” that was published by FIFA and has helped pave the way for Saudi Arabia to be confirmed on 11 December as the 2034 hosts, as is widely expected to happen.

    The assessment contains no substantive discussion of extensive and relevant abuses in Saudi Arabia documented by multiple human rights organisations and UN bodies. It formed the basis of Saudi Arabia’s human rights strategy for the tournament, which Amnesty International described as a “whitewash”.

    The 11 organisations – which include a Saudi Arabian diaspora organisation, Gulf human rights groups, and labour organisations, as well as Football Supporters Europe, Amnesty and Human Rights Watch – wrote to Clifford Chance’s Global Managing Partner setting out in detail all of their concerns with the statement, and invited the authors to publish an updated report. The firm, which says that it works in partnership with “some of the world’s leading NGOs and civil society organisations”, said in response last week that it would be “inappropriate” to offer any further comment on the report and shared a link to publicly available company policies.

    Dire human rights record

    Saudi Arabia’s already dire human rights record has deteriorated under the de facto rule of Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, who has presided over a soaring number of mass executions, torture, enforced disappearance, severe restrictions on free expression, repression of women’s rights under the male guardianship system, LGBTI+ discrimination, and the killing of hundreds of migrants at the  Saudi Arabia-Yemen border. The country’s abusive Kafala (labour sponsorship) system, as well as the prohibition on trade unions and lack of enforcement of labour laws continues to lead to the widespread exploitation of migrant workers.

    The organisations have warned Clifford Chance that, through the production of its human rights assessment by AS&H Clifford Chance, there is a risk that the firm could be linked to potential adverse human rights impacts resulting from a Saudi Arabia-hosted tournament.

    In their memorandum to Clifford Chance the organisations set out and requested comment on three overarching concerns about the assessment. Taken together, these fatally undermine the report’s claim to provide an independent assessment of the human rights context in Saudi Arabia, relevant to the hosting and staging of the 2034 World Cup.

    • AS&H Clifford Chance agreed to a decision by FIFA and the Saudi Arabian Football Federation to effectively exclude analysis of Saudi Arabia’s record on multiple critical human rights such as freedom of expression, LGBTI+ discrimination, the prohibition of trade unions, or forced evictions – either because Saudi Arabia has not ratified the relevant treaties or because the Saudi Arabian Football Federation did not accept them as “applying”. Any assessment that does not recognise these as relevant human rights risks for a World Cup in Saudi Arabia cannot be considered credible.
    •  The assessment made highly selective use of the findings of UN bodies on Saudi Arabia, leaving out damaging judgements. For example, it fails to reference one UN body’s concern at receiving reports that “torture and other ill-treatment are commonly practised in prisons”, or another which notes that “women and girls who are victims of sexual abuse risk facing criminal proceedings if they press charges”. It does not mention that Saudi Arabia is currently facing a labour complaint at the UN brought by Building and Woodworkers International, an international trade union. No reports by UN Special Rapporteurs are included meaning, for example, there is no reference to the imposition of the death penalty in relation to the Crown Prince’s flagship giga-project NEOM, or the murder of Saudi Arabian journalist Jamal Khashoggi.
    • There is no evidence that AS&H Clifford Chance consulted external experts, such as people who might be affected by human rights abuses linked to the tournament, Saudi Arabian human rights experts or organisations, international human rights organisations, or trade unions. No work by such groups is referenced. The report, for example, ignores Amnesty’s 2024 91-page report ‘Playing a Dangerous Game? Human Rights Risks Linked to the 2030 and 2034 FIFA World Cups’.

    Amnesty has written to FIFA asking it to confirm on what basis the organisation agreed with the Saudi Arabian Football Federation to limit the scope of the rights assessment conducted by AS&H Clifford Chance. As of 25 October, FIFA had not responded.

    James Lynch, FairSquare co-director, said: 

    “It has been clear for more than a year now that FIFA is determined to remove all potential obstacles to make sure it can hand Saudi Arabia’s Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman the 2034 World Cup. By producing a shockingly poor report, AS&H Clifford Chance, part of one of the world’s largest law firms that makes much of its human rights expertise, has helped to remove a key final stumbling block.”

    Julia Legner, Executive Director of ALQST for Human Rights, a Saudi Arabian diaspora organisation, said:

    “AS&H Clifford Chance had the chance to write a credible assessment of risks that are relevant to the 2034 World Cup. Instead, they have produced an artificially limited, misleading and overly positive perspective, that serves only to whitewash the reality of abuse and discrimination faced by Saudi Arabia’s citizens and residents.”

    Steve Cockburn, Amnesty International’s Head of Labour Rights and Sport, said:

    “The severe risks of hosting the 2034 World Cup in Saudi Arabia are clear and well-known – without huge reforms, critics will be arrested, women and LGBTI+ people will face discrimination, and workers will be exploited on a massive scale. It is incredible that AS&H Clifford Chance omitted such glaring risks from its assessment and scandalous that FIFA paved the way for them to do so. FIFA must now insist on a proper assessment and meaningful human rights strategy or its flagship tournament will inevitably be tarnished by severe human rights violations.”

    Martha Waithira, Equidem investigator, said:

    “As a former domestic worker in Saudi Arabia from Kenya, I know that women like me are often treated like slaves. Women especially face sexual and other gender abuse. I’m in regular contact with workers in horrific situations in Saudi Arabia. Now, the hundreds of thousands of people expected to arrive in Saudi Arabia to build stadiums and clean hotels ahead of the World Cup are at great risk of severe exploitation and even death. How can these realities have escaped AS&H Clifford Chance’s attention?”

    Stated commitments to human rights

    The Independent Context Assessment Prepared for the Saudi Arabian Football Federation in relation to the FIFA World Cup 2034’ can be found on FIFA’s website. FIFA’s Human Rights Policy, adopted in 2017, outlines its responsibility to identify and address adverse human rights impacts of its operations, including taking adequate measures to prevent and mitigate human rights abuses.

    Clifford Chance is one of the world’s largest law firms. It has made multiple commitments concerning its human rights responsibilities, including in its company code. The firm states on its global website that its client base in Saudi Arabia, delivered “through AS&H Clifford Chance” includes “key Saudi Ministries and government-owned entities as well as a wide range of government owned, privately and publicly held Saudi and international businesses, listed companies and financial institutions.” These Saudi clients include the Public Investment Fund. AS&H Clifford Chance is a joint venture between Clifford Chance and AS&H that has been registered in Saudi Arabia since 2023. It is integrated within Clifford Chance’s global firm, “follows [the global firm’s] processes and practices”, and employs a number of Clifford Chance partners, including a “Senior Clifford Chance partner”. The Independent Context Assessment refers readers to the global Clifford Chance website.

    Full list of signatories:

    FairSquare

    ALQST for Human Rights

    Amnesty International

    The Army of Survivors

    Building and Woodworkers International

    Equidem

    Football Supporters Europe

    Gulf Centre for Human Rights

    Human Rights Watch

    Middle East Democracy Center

    Migrant-Rights.org

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI Global: Michiganders or Michiganians? A linguist explains why the answer is clear

    Source: The Conversation – USA – By Robin Queen, Professor of Linguistics, English Language and Literatures and Germanic Languages and Literatures, University of Michigan

    Beloved Michigander Aidan Hutchinson is no silly goose. Nic Antaya/Getty Images

    Growing up in the late 1970s, my best friend was from Michigan. Early in our friendship I asked her what someone from Michigan is called. “Michigander,” she replied. I laughed and said, “You mean like a goose?” Her older sister then chimed in that it was being changed to Michiganian. Michigander is sexist, she said, since gander refers only to a male goose.

    I spent the next two decades never questioning, or particularly thinking about, Michiganian.

    Then, I moved to Michigan. In over 20 years living here, I’ve never heard anyone say Michiganian. People from Michigan call themselves Michiganders.

    Even though it may seem rather trivial, there is endless interest in the Michigander-Michiganian question. News articles about this topic pop up fairly regularly, inevitably stating that:

    1. Both terms are recognized.

    2. Abraham Lincoln coined “Michigander” in 1848 to insult Michigan Gov. Lewis Cass, implying he was silly, weak and unserious.

    3. Govs. James Blanchard, John Engler and Jennifer Granholm used “Michiganian,” while Govs. Rick Snyder and Gretchen Whitmer prefer “Michigander.”

    4. The debate about which term is correct is ongoing.

    For the most part, though, the debate seems long over. Many Michiganders haven’t heard of Michiganian, as a recent text thread with my 19-year-old neighbor illustrates:

    ‘It’s just Michigander.’
    Robin Queen, CC BY-SA

    Regardless of whether there is – or ever really has been – a debate, the pas de deux between Michigander and Michiganian has an unusual history and peculiar twists and turns.

    As a linguist who works on issues related to authority in language and linguistic justice, I like to investigate how terms come to be understood as correct, and on whose authority those determinations are made.

    In the case of Michiganian and Michigander, Michiganian appears in style guides, and Michigander is the term most frequently used by people from Michigan.

    Rooted in an insult

    While it’s true that Lincoln called Cass “the great Michigander” as an unambiguous insult, the term Michigander appeared in print as early as 1838.

    Despite not having coined the term, however, Lincoln did likely play a part in its popularization by using it to malign Cass.

    Google’s NGram, which tracks how often terms appear in a large collection of print sources, shows Michigander has been used more frequently in print than Michiganian since around 1845.

    Michigander has outperformed Michiganian in print for over 175 years.
    Google NGram

    No specific law designates the use of one term or the other, but the terms do appear in two Michigan laws.

    The first is in the Older Michiganians Act, which was passed in 1981.

    The second is tied to the Historical Markers Act. The original act, established in 1955, used the term Michigander, but an amendment to it in 2002 changed the term to Michiganian. In 2017, the act was updated and the moniker was changed back to Michigander.

    Interestingly, the federal government, in the form of the U.S. Government Publishing Office’s Style Manual, specifies Michiganian as the correct term. This represents a change from Michiganite, which was the term specified in the Style Manual from 1945 to 2000, likely as a match to terms such as Wisconsinite.

    It’s difficult to know the origins of Michigander prior to 1848, but Lincoln did likely coin the term Michigander as a blend of Michigan and gander, leading to the possibility for goose jokes and humor. While other states have unusual monikers – such as Hoosiers for Indiana – none involves an animal pun like gander.

    The humorous aspect of Michigander is what likely keeps the articles, Reddit threads and friendly banter going.

    In 1947, the American journalist and essayist H.L. Mencken wrote, “The chief objection to Michigander is that it inspires idiots to call a Michigan woman a Michigoose and a child a Michigosling, but the people of the State have got used to this …”

    Funny or sexist?

    Gander humor reigns when it comes to Michigander. But perhaps more importantly, Michigander provides a greater sense of belonging and identity than Michiganian, despite the fact that there are those who find Michiganian has more finesse.

    That sense of identity is evident in the many pairings of Michigander with other charming things that are a part of living in Michigan, such as using your hand to show where in the mitten-shaped state you are from.

    How Michiganders explain where they’re from.
    (WT-en) TVerBeek at English Wikivoyage, CC BY-SA

    Given that gander designates a male goose, Michigander does raise questions about sexism.

    The rise in the use of Michiganian along with the fall of Michigander from the late 1970s to the early 2000s occurred alongside broader recognition of sexism in different realms of social life. It corresponds with a variety of changes to the terms people had been using, such as chairman, waitress and fireman. In 2024, it is unremarkable to refer instead to a chair or chairperson, a server, or a firefighter.

    So, why hang on to Michigander?

    Given that Whitmer is a proud and consistent user of Michigander, the most likely answer is that people from Michigan don’t feel the term is exclusionary. As a colleague of mine, a Michigan-raised feminist activist in her 60s, told me, “Do we not have real issues of sexism in the vernacular? I never heard anyone use any other term growing up.”

    Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer has no qualms with Michigander.
    GIPHY News

    Over the past several days, I’ve asked over two dozen people who were born and raised in Michigan what they call someone from Michigan. To a person, they have said Michigander. They range in age from 19-89, have different gender identities and racial affiliations, and have a wide range of professions and political orientations.

    Only one had ever heard anyone referred to as a Michiganian, while a third had never heard the term Michiganian at all.

    My results reflect other poll results about these terms. A clear majority choose Michigander.

    When the people of Michigan say they are Michiganders, it’s odd to insist that they are Michiganians. And even those few, such as The Detroit News, who prefer Michiganian acknowledge that Michigander is more broadly preferred.

    Ultimately the debate rests on whether it’s the people from Michigan or some other entity, such as the Government Publishing Office, that decides which term should be used. If we grant the people of Michigan the right to name themselves, the verdict is clear.

    Robin Queen does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. Michiganders or Michiganians? A linguist explains why the answer is clear – https://theconversation.com/michiganders-or-michiganians-a-linguist-explains-why-the-answer-is-clear-241664

    MIL OSI – Global Reports

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Chancellor: “We will build a Britain where those who can work, will work”

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    Ahead of Budget later this week, the Chancellor pledges work and welfare overhaul so people who can work, do work.

    • £240 million Get Britain Working package to include work, skills and health support for disabled people and long-term sick.
    • Benefit reform to be accelerated from this autumn to give more people access to employment support.

    Ahead of the Budget, the Chancellor has unveiled a £240 million cash-injection to accelerate the rollout of local services to help people back into work and drive down inactivity.

    The intervention comes as stark figures show that the UK remains the only G7 country that has higher levels of economic inactivity now than before the pandemic, with 2.8 million people out of work due to long-term sickness, which is holding back productivity and stunting growth. 

    The funding is partly set to go towards boosting the rollout of Get Britain Working “trailblazers” in local areas, which will bring together and streamline work, health, and skills support to disabled people and those who are long term sick.

    These trailblazers will focus on reaching people who are not normally in touch with the system, by enabling local areas to help them access existing support in skills, education, employment, or health but also testing new early interventions targeted at the specific barriers they are facing to work.

    Recognising that poor health is a key driver of economic inactivity, these trailblazers will also ensure work and skills support is better integrated with the health service, to ensure people get the joined-up health and employment support they need to get back into work and stay in work.

    The government will also work in close partnership with mayors to develop these trailblazers, to ensure these local services are tailored to meet the unique employment and inactivity challenges in different areas.

    Benefit reform is also set to be accelerated this year, with 800,000 people on the old Employment and Support Allowance (ESA) benefit to be moved onto Universal Credit (UC) from this autumn instead of 2028.

    This move will bring more people into a modern benefit regime, continuing to ensure they are supported to look for and move into work. 

    It comes ahead of the Get Britain Working White Paper – set to be unveiled later in the Autumn – which will set out the government’s ambitious plans for reform to break down barriers to work.

    The reforms will be underpinned by an approach of high expectation and high support as well as a belief in mutual obligations: the responsibility to work if you can, backed up by proper support and real opportunities to get a decent job.

    Chancellor of the Exchequer, Rachel Reeves said:

    Due to years of economic neglect, the benefits bill is ballooning. We will build a Britain where people who can work, will work, turning the page on the recent rise in economic inactivity and decline and towards a future where people have good jobs and our benefits bill is under control.

    Work and Pensions Secretary, Liz Kendall said:

    Millions of people have been denied the opportunity to build a better life. This includes one-in-eight young people who have had their hopes of a brighter future dashed and written off before they’ve even begun.

    Through our Get Britain Working plan, we will ensure every young person is supported to find earnings or learning, while our new jobs and careers service will transform opportunity for all, as we deliver the fundamental reforms needed to tackle spiralling inactivity, grow the economy, and take our first steps to our ambitious 80 per cent employment rate.

    Unlocking barriers to work and tackling inactivity is at the heart of plans to improve living standards for everyone across the country and delivering on the central mission of driving growth.

    By creating more good jobs through investment, reforming employment support, fixing our NHS, making work pay through our Employment Rights Bill, and devolving power out of Westminster as set out in our forthcoming English Devolution White Paper, we will ensure many more people can benefit from the dignity and purpose that comes with work.

    These reforms will support more people into jobs alongside the Plan to Make Work Pay, that will make sure that those jobs provide security, a decent wage, and the genuine two-sided flexibility needed so people can thrive at work.

    This plan is central to the Government’s efforts to repair the damage done to the economy, fix its foundations, and rebuild Britain so it becomes a country of growth, not decline.

    Shevaun Haviland, Director General of the British Chambers of Commerce said:

    The high number of working age people who are economically inactive is a real and daily concern to employers. Many firms are struggling to fill job vacancies, and this is constraining their operations and profitability. 

    We welcome further cash investment into tackling economic activity. Businesses will be pleased to hear about plans to improve skills, health and employment support for people who want to work – alongside support for young people to start and build their careers.  

    It’s important these changes are delivered quickly to help firms develop thriving workforces, so they can grow and invest further in the years to come.

    Updates to this page

    Published 28 October 2024

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Could you provide an opportunity for a young person leaving care?

    Source: City of Plymouth

    Could you help change the life chances of a young person leaving care? If so, the Council would love to hear from you.

    We are asking businesses to consider offering a job opportunity to a care leaver. Compared with other young people locally, care leavers are around nine times more likely to not be in education, training or employment when they enter adulthood.

    Councillor Jemima Laing, Deputy Leader of the Council and Cabinet Member for Children’s Social Care, said; “Care leavers are our city’s young people, and we need to work together as a city to ensure they have a successful future.

    “Care leavers face significant challenges over and above those normally experienced by our children and young people, but with the right support they can succeed in managing the move to independent living and a career. Supportive employers can play a vital part in ensuring they have the same opportunities in life as other young people.

    “Over the last five years, on average we have 180 young people leaving care in Plymouth every year.

    “We are very keen to hear from local employers who are willing to give our care leavers a chance, who can offer an apprenticeship, or a work placement for a vulnerable child trying to navigate the difficult path of leaving care and moving to independent living.  We are asking for your help to ensure that our care leavers get the same opportunities in life as other young people.

    “Offering a care leaver a job opportunity will give businesses a chance to invest in young people who have bright ideas and shows that they are a supportive organisation willing to give young people a chance at starting a career.”

    If you are thinking of offering an apprenticeship, the government offers a bursary which is paid to the apprenticed care leaver after they have maintained their apprenticeship for 60 days. The bursary aims to support care leavers as they move from care into independent living and work.  

    The Council has developed a free pastoral leadership programme through On Course South West, for managers and employers that employ care experienced young people. These programmes can be personalised for your business with flexible delivery optionsThe flexible programme includes short courses on safeguarding, trauma informed practice and mental health awareness, visit: On Course South West

    As an approved apprenticeship training provider, the Council can offer support to businesses to develop an apprenticeship or supported apprenticeship programme, contact apprenticeships@plymouth.gov.uk for more information.

    For more information, visit: Care leavers | PLYMOUTH.GOV.UK

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI: Correction: cBrain lowers expected yearly revenue growth to 10-15%, but maintains EBT margin of 24-30%

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Company Announcement no. 10/2024

    cBrain lowers expected yearly revenue growth to 10-15%, but maintains EBT margin of 24-30%

    Copenhagen, November 28, 2024

    cBrain (NASDAQ: CBRAIN) is executing its international growth plan with a financial goal of reaching total revenue of 350 million DKK in 2025. This goal is anchored in two primary revenue streams, referred to as “Base” and “Stepping stones”. 

    The “Base” stream aims to achieve annual revenue growth of 10-15% by strengthening and expanding existing operations and customer relationships. In parallel, the “Stepping Stones” initiative aims to lift annual revenue growth to 30%, by increasing contract values and winning larger international contracts.

    cBrain continues to execute its growth strategy, building a robust pipeline of major opportunities. This is facilitated by a growing number of international pilot projects that set the stage for significant “Stepping Stones” achievements.

    In early 2024, cBrain anticipated some of these opportunities, particularly in Germany and the U.S., to yield significant revenue in the second half of the year. cBrain remains highly active in these pursuits and has added further opportunities during the year.

    However, not unusually with larger government procurement, delays in decision making mean that cBrain estimates less than a 50% likelihood of substantial revenue from larger international projects materializing in Q4. Consequently, cBrain adjusts its 2024 revenue growth forecast to 10-15%, down from the initial estimate of 20-25%.

    In alignment with business planning, cBrain has earmarked financial investments to support “Stepping Stones” projects in Germany and the U.S. Since these projects have not yet materialized, these reserved funds have not been deployed. This provides a positive impact on earnings. cBrain, therefore, maintains its EBT (Earnings Before Tax) guidance at 24-30%.

    Larger international projects are often structured so that F2 standard software licenses form the majority of the contract value. Due to financial standards for software revenue recognition, larger international orders may, as a result, introduce greater variability in revenue patterns over time.

    As cBrain is currently pursuing global opportunities across the USA, Europe, Africa, the UAE, and India, some of these opportunities may still materialize during the fourth quarter, with a positive affect on this year’s revenue.

    Best regards

    Per Tejs Knudsen, CEO

    Inquiries regarding this Company Announcement may be directed to

    Ejvind Jørgensen, CFO & Head of Investor Relations, cBrain A/S, ir@cbrain.com, +45 2594 4973

    Attachment

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI Global: Why donors should ask local communities what matters to them while deciding what success looks like

    Source: The Conversation – USA – By Erin K. McFee, Professor of Practice of Climate Security, National Defense University

    Members of the Leonor Cuadras cooperative sort nursery-grown oysters in La Reforma, Mexico, in December 2023. Jonathan Röders, CC BY-ND

    Have you ever asked a teacher whether something will be on an upcoming test to decide whether to closely pay attention to a particular lesson? Taken the long way back from a lunch break to get enough exercise to meet a goal monitored by a fitness app? Logged on to a virtual meeting to be seen showing up, even as you worked on other tasks?

    It’s human nature to adapt your behavior to meet evaluation criteria – even when meeting those targets comes at the expense of attaining more meaningful goals. Most donors, whether they are governments providing foreign aid, foundations making grants or individual people who give nonprofits money, expect or demand reports on what was accomplished with their funding. And what is measured for that purpose and how it’s measured tend to shape entire programs – often missing the mark on what truly matters to the communities involved.

    While spending years conducting fieldwork everywhere from Colombia to the Kenya-Uganda border as a political anthropologist and a political scientist, we’ve witnessed firsthand the absurdities of the bureaucratic hoops people must jump through to access vital aid. We’ve watched both genuine efforts to abide by the guidelines donors set and the cynical exploitation of them. We have also spent years engaged in international development efforts, both with and through nonprofits that sought to resolve some of the world’s most intractable problems.

    There’s a glaring and crucial question we’ve rarely heard asked when projects are being designed: What does success look like to the people meant to benefit from development funding?

    Promoting environmental sustainability

    We conducted an exploratory field study in La Reforma, a small coastal town located in the Mexican state of Sinaloa.

    We focused on the Leonor Cuadras Oyster Aquaculture Cooperative, a locally led initiative supported by the seafood company Marine Edén and SUCEDE, a Mexican nongovernmental organization that’s dedicated to promoting individual, social and environmental well-being in La Reforma and other nearby communities.

    This particular project sought to create jobs for women in La Reforma, while promoting environmental sustainability through oyster farming. The cooperative’s objectives included empowering women, fostering collective work and contributing to local environmental restoration by improving water quality through oyster filtration. Traditional metrics for projects like this would tally labor hours, harvest size and jobs created – all important but incomplete insights into the whole story.

    Our study was unusual because it was designed as an exploratory effort to help shape future metrics in a participatory manner. We sought to understand the cooperative’s internal dynamics and challenges so we could create metrics that reflected what the cooperative members wanted and needed.

    After several weeks of fieldwork, multiple focus group discussions and eight interviews with people involved in the cooperative in the last quarter of 2023, we found that success is not solely defined by the number of oysters they produce or the dollar signs next to their names in a report submitted to donors.

    In their view, success is framed around dignity, gender equity and the well-being of their families and the environment. We also learned that their work together had increased a sense of collective commitment to the project and each other.

    Measuring success in terms that make sense to locals

    Most donors love numbers. They want to know how many people attended an event, how much money was spent, how many widgets were produced. But while such outcomes are easily measurable, they are not always meaningful.

    In La Reforma, the women who belong to the Leonor Cuadras cooperative told us that they define success differently. Their primary goal isn’t just to grow oysters. They see their co-op as a tool for social transformation, not just a source of income.

    One woman we’ll call Aurelia to protect her anonymity proudly shared that working with the cooperative has proved that “we can do things on par with men.”

    Julia, another cooperative member, put it this way: “We are not just working for ourselves – we are working for the future of our families and our community.”

    This version of success includes improving their family’s prospects and safeguarding their marine environment for future generations. As the oysters they grow naturally filter and clean the bay’s waters, so too does their collaborative work improve the social fabric of this violence-affected community in ways that won’t show up on a balance sheet.

    Finding participatory approaches

    When donors impose their own frameworks and set their own goals for the projects they fund, they usually miss what truly defines success for local communities. In La Reforma, the women are acquiring technical skills related to oyster farming, but they seem to see more value in the empowerment that comes with leading a project that reflects their realities and needs.

    If the cooperative’s donors had chosen to focus on traditional production metrics, such as the number of participants, the scale of the harvest and the hours of labor involved, they would have surely overlooked the deeper social shifts, such as women’s leadership in a male-dominated profession or a greater commitment to collective well-being.

    What if, instead of dictating outcomes from the start, donors worked collaboratively with communities to define success? The cooperative’s members want independence. They hope that someday they will run their own oyster farms or support other aquaculture initiatives. These are aspirations that don’t fit into traditional donor checkboxes. But that kind of approach is critical for the project’s sustainability.

    Some donors and development agencies are beginning to integrate this approach. For example, the International Organization for Migration consults with community members when writing performance reviews. Some donors have embraced an approach called trust-based philanthropy, which largely removes reporting burdens altogether. They focus instead on collaborative relationships with their grantees.

    What is measured matters. It can shape the goals and the limits of projects long before a single dollar is spent.

    Setting goals that are more relevant to local conditions requires a radical shift in how development projects are designed and evaluated. Rather than imposing predetermined outcomes, we believe that it is crucial to ask of the communities and individuals on the ground: What does success look like to you?

    Erin McFee is the founder and president of the Corioli Institute, which conducted this study. The research for this article was funded by the UK Research and Innovation Future Leader Fellows Program. The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not reflect official policies or positions of the National Defense University, the Department of Defense or the U. S. government.

    Jonathan Röders is Director of Projects & Programs at the Corioli Institute, which conducted this study. His contribution to this research was funded by UK Research and Innovation.

    ref. Why donors should ask local communities what matters to them while deciding what success looks like – https://theconversation.com/why-donors-should-ask-local-communities-what-matters-to-them-while-deciding-what-success-looks-like-241196

    MIL OSI – Global Reports

  • MIL-OSI Global: Why do we use gasoline for small vehicles and diesel fuel for big vehicles?

    Source: The Conversation – USA – By Michael Leamy, Woodruff Endowed Professor of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology

    Green pump for diesel, blue for gas – but what’s the difference? Jeffrey Greenberg/Education Images/Universal Images Group via Getty Images

    Curious Kids is a series for children of all ages. If you have a question you’d like an expert to answer, send it to curiouskidsus@theconversation.com.


    Why do we use gasoline for small vehicles and diesel fuel for big vehicles? – Methdini, age 15, Sri Lanka


    Gasoline fuels most light-duty vehicles, such as passenger cars and pickup trucks. Heavy-duty vehicles, like buses, delivery trucks and long-haul tractor-trailers, typically run on diesel.

    Both fuel types are needed because gasoline and diesel engines have different strengths. As my automotive engineering students learn, this makes them suitable for different uses.

    Let’s start with what they have in common. Gas and diesel engines both work through a process called internal combustion.

    • First, they mix fuel with air because the fuel needs oxygen from the air to burn.

    • Next, they compress the fuel-air mixture, which makes the mixture hot enough to burn.

    • Then the engine burns the mix of fuel and air, releasing heat. This creates high pressure, which moves internal parts that make the car move.

    • Finally, the car releases spent combustion gases to the atmosphere through its tailpipe. These gases contain pollutants, such as carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides and unburned fuel, that are harmful to human health, as well as carbon dioxide, which warms Earth’s atmosphere.

    How a gas-powered internal combustion engine converts chemical energy in gasoline into kinetic energy that makes the car move.

    Different engines for different jobs

    Gasoline and diesel fuel are both made from crude oil, a fossil-based energy source. But they have different chemical properties that require different types of engines.

    In a gas engine, a small device called a spark plug ignites the compressed fuel-air mixture. It uses hundreds of thousands of volts to create an electrical arc that can start the burn, much like striking a flint rock against another stone.

    Diesel fuel is harder to ignite and slower to burn than gasoline. But if it is compressed enough, it will ignite without a spark. And this higher compression results in higher efficiency, so vehicles powered with diesel get more miles per gallon. That’s important for transporting goods and people as economically as possible – one reason why most buses, trains and large trucks run on diesel.

    Diesel engines tend to be more expensive than gas engines, since they need sturdier parts to withstand the higher temperatures and pressures they produce. But they also last longer than gasoline engines. This is a plus for vehicles such as long-haul trucks that need to go many hundreds of thousands of miles between engine overhauls.

    So why do passenger cars use gas? One reason is that diesel engines’ higher compression and temperature make them noisier, especially at higher frequencies that humans find annoying. Diesel engines also produce higher levels of fine particle pollution, known as PM 2.5, that has been linked to many human health risks.

    These trade-offs typically lead consumers to prefer cheaper, quieter gasoline engines in cars they drive for work and pleasure. Efficient, long-lasting diesel engines are more attractive to companies hauling goods and transporting large numbers of people.

    Beyond internal combustion engines

    In the future, transportation may not use gas or diesel at all. Some cars and light trucks – models known as hybrids – already use gas or diesel together with batteries and electric motors, or run entirely on electricity. And cities across the U.S. are investing in electric school buses, which are lower-polluting and cheaper to maintain than diesel buses.

    Hybrid, plug-in hybrid and battery electric vehicles promise to result in far fewer emissions of toxic gases and carbon dioxide – especially if they are recharged with electricity produced from renewable sources like wind and solar power. These vehicles will be quieter than gasoline and diesel models and also cheaper to maintain, since they have fewer moving parts. Gasoline and diesel vehicles will remain in use for years to come, but they no longer represent the forefront of transportation innovation.


    Hello, curious kids! Do you have a question you’d like an expert to answer? Ask an adult to send your question to CuriousKidsUS@theconversation.com. Please tell us your name, age and the city where you live.

    And since curiosity has no age limit – adults, let us know what you’re wondering, too. We won’t be able to answer every question, but we will do our best.

    Michael Leamy receives funding from the National Science Foundation, the Department of Energy, General Motors, and other government agencies and corporations.

    ref. Why do we use gasoline for small vehicles and diesel fuel for big vehicles? – https://theconversation.com/why-do-we-use-gasoline-for-small-vehicles-and-diesel-fuel-for-big-vehicles-235084

    MIL OSI – Global Reports

  • MIL-OSI Global: Trump’s anti-Haitian rhetoric reflects America’s long-standing racism against Haiti and its people

    Source: The Conversation – USA – By Thurka Sangaramoorthy, Professor of Anthropology, American University

    Pastor Dieufort Fleurissaint denounces the hateful rhetoric aimed at Haitian migrants in Springfield, Ohio, during a Sept. 24, 2024, rally in Boston. Jessica Rinaldi/The Boston Globe/Getty Images)

    Since 2021, about 15,000 Haitians have found new lives in Springfield, Ohio, after fleeing the violence of Haiti, their native country.

    But a wave of baseless rumors and hate, amplified by former President Donald Trump and his running mate, U.S. Sen. JD Vance, has shattered that sense of safety. Many of the city’s Haitian immigrants are left questioning whether their vision of an American dream is still possible.

    Frightened and worried, many Haitians say they are fearful of going outside and staying in Springfield.

    The morning after the presidential debate, a Haitian woman who had moved to Springfield six years ago told a newspaper reporter that “they’re attacking us in every way.”

    In addition to the anxiety, the woman, who asked not to be identified, said that her car windows had been broken in the middle of the night. “I’m going to have to move because this area is no longer good for me,” the woman said. “I can’t even leave my house to go to Walmart. I’m anxious and scared.”

    Trump’s inflammatory statements, which have included wrongful allegations of Haitians eating pets, are part of a broader historical pattern of racism and anti-Black xenophobia in the U.S. aimed at Haitians. Days after the debate, Trump further explained how he would start his mass deportation program in Springfield. “Illegal Haitian migrants have descended upon a town of 58,000 people, destroying their way of life,” Trump said.

    The comments have not only stoked existing racial tensions but have also sparked racist discourse and violent threats against Haitians across the country.

    As a scholar of migration who has studied Haitian immigrants in the U.S. for over 25 years, I have seen how Haitians, as Black immigrants, are doubly marginalized, by not only the structural racism embedded in U.S. immigration policies but also the broader societal racism experienced by Black Americans.

    In my view, Trump’s baseless allegations reflect America’s deeply rooted history of systemic racism against Haiti and its people.

    A flawed history

    The roots of anti-Haitian racism in the U.S. can be traced to the Haitian Revolution in 1804 in which Black Haitians who were enslaved rose up and overthrew the French colonial government.

    Haiti became the first independent Black republic in the world, and the country’s independence terrified many in the U.S., especially white slaveholders. They feared the revolution might inspire slave revolts at home.

    Illustration depicting the Haitian Revolution led by Toussaint Louverture.
    Bettmann/Getty Images

    For much of the 19th century, the U.S. refused to recognize Haiti as a legitimate nation. It wasn’t until 1862, during the Civil War, that the U.S. finally established diplomatic relations with the country.

    But the U.S. continued to exploit Haiti for its own economic and military interests, occupying the country with the military from 1915 to 1934. During this period, the U.S. controlled Haiti’s government and finances, installed a pro-American president and helped establish a brutal military force.

    The occupation worsened racial and economic inequality in Haiti and further destabilized the nation.

    This history of exploitation and interference has had long-lasting effects on Haiti’s ability to develop economically and politically, a situation exacerbated by continued U.S. intervention throughout the Cold War era.

    During the nearly 30-year dictatorships of François “Papa Doc” and Jean-Claude “Baby Doc” Duvalier between 1957 and 1986, for example, the U.S. government provided approximately US$900 million in financial support to these repressive regimes, despite their notorious human-rights abuses.

    Anti-Black immigration policies

    All the history of U.S. involvement in Haiti set the stage for the mass migration of Haitians to the U.S. since the early 1960s.

    Over the years, about 200,000 Haitians have sought to escape violence and poverty to the U.S.

    Those with resources, such as the Haitian elite and middle class, migrated legally, settling in New York and Miami. Many of them organized ways to send aid to Haiti and brought attention to human-rights abuses being committed by the Duvalier regimes.

    Poor Haitians soon followed, arriving by crude boats.

    In September 1963, the first boatload of Haitian refugees landed in Miami. But instead of finding freedom, all 23 Haitians were denied asylum and sent back to Haiti by the U.S. immigration authorities.

    Since then, Haitians arriving by boat have faced arrest, detention, asylum denials and deportation as successive U.S. governments refused to recognize the political repression in Haiti. Instead, Haitians were labeled economic migrants who sought a better standard of living and, as such, were not eligible for asylum.

    From 1981 to 1991, for instance, 433 boats carrying approximately 25,580 Haitians were intercepted by U.S. immigration authorities. Only 28 people were allowed to pursue refugee claims.

    The Haitian experience in the US

    Often portrayed by white policymakers as disease carriers and criminals, Haitian immigrants have long suffered discrimination and dehumanization in the U.S.

    In the 1980s, during the HIV crisis, U.S. health officials wrongly labeled Haitians as high-risk carriers of the virus, reinforcing harmful racial and ethnic stereotypes.

    Despite a lack of scientific evidence, Haitians were stigmatized as a group, leading to economic and social exclusion within the U.S. Many Haitians lost jobs, housing and faced threats of violence simply because of their nationality and ethnicity.

    My research has shown this portrayal of Haitians as dangerous and undesirable persists today, as reflected in Trump’s and Vance’s recent claims. The narrative of immigrants eating pets and spreading diseases is a recycled trope in American history, used by white conservative politicians to stoke fears about foreigners to reinforce white supremacy.

    Historically, these kinds of claims have been used to justify exclusionary immigration policies and racial violence against nonwhite populations.

    A group of Haitian Americans in Springfield, Ohio, listen to area residents denounce the town’s growing Haitian population during a public meeting on Sept. 24, 2024.
    Dominic Gwinn/Middle East Images /Getty Images

    The accusations against Haitians in Springfield have not only triggered immediate threats of violence but have also reinforced deep-seated, anti-Black xenophobia that continues to plague U.S. society.

    In recent years, hate speech and attacks against Black immigrants, including Haitians, have been on the rise. Black immigrants, regardless of their legal status, face higher rates of deportation and are more likely to be targeted than white immigrants by law enforcement.

    Addressing anti-Haitian racism

    The allegations made by Trump and Vance represent a dangerous escalation of rhetoric that has real-life consequences for Haitians in the U.S.

    The demonization of Haitians in Springfield is not just a political ploy – it is part of a broader strategy to uphold systems of exclusion that have historically been used to marginalize Black people, both immigrants and citizens.

    Thurka Sangaramoorthy receives funding from the National Institutes of Health.

    ref. Trump’s anti-Haitian rhetoric reflects America’s long-standing racism against Haiti and its people – https://theconversation.com/trumps-anti-haitian-rhetoric-reflects-americas-long-standing-racism-against-haiti-and-its-people-240975

    MIL OSI – Global Reports

  • MIL-OSI Global: LGBTQ+ voters in these 4 states could swing the 2024 presidential election

    Source: The Conversation – USA – By Dorian Rhea Debussy, Lecturer of Women’s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies, The Ohio State University

    LGBTQ+ voters lean heavily Democratic, and they tend to turn out in high numbers. Dani VG via Getty Images

    Victory in the 2024 U.S. presidential election may come down to LGBTQ+ voters.

    Polling data shows that Donald Trump and Kamala Harris are running in a near-dead heat in four states – Georgia, Michigan, North Carolina and Pennsylvania. And as a scholar of LGBTQ+ politics, I suspect that LGBTQ+ voters could play an outsize role in these states and the race.

    So, how might LGBTQ+ voters swing these states?

    LGBTQ+ voting behavior, explained

    In the most comprehensive political survey of LGBTQ+ Americans ever conducted, the Pew Research Center found in 2013 that the vast majority of respondents – 85% – “always” or “nearly always” voted, compared with roughly a third of the general population. Turnout in the most recent presidential election validated that finding. A 2020 post-election survey by the advocacy group GLAAD found that 81% of LGBTQ+ voters cast a ballot.

    For context, 64% of all eligible voters cast a ballot in the 2020 presidential election, which was unusually high voter participation. Historically, turnout hovers around 55% for presidential elections and 35% for midterm elections.

    An LGBTQ+ delegate at the 2024 Democratic National Convention.
    Alex Wroblewski/AFP via Getty Images

    The National Center for Transgender Equality, an advocacy organization, finds that voter turnout is particularly high among transgender people.

    Even in the historically low-turnout 2014 midterm election, the group’s data indicated that roughly half of transgender respondents had voted, compared with only one-third of the general population. In the 2022 midterm election, transgender voter turnout increased to nearly 75%, according to the 2024 U.S. Trans Survey.

    LGBTQ+ voters and partisanship

    LGBTQ+ voters strongly lean Democratic. Pew’s 2013 survey found that nearly 60% of all LGBTQ+ respondents were Democrats, and less than 10% were Republicans. Transgender voters are even more partisan, and nearly 80% identified as Democratic or Democratic-leaning in the 2015 U.S. Trans Survey.

    Exit poll data from the 2016 presidential election supports this conclusion. Nearly 80% of LGBTQ+ voters told researchers outside polling stations that they’d cast their ballot for Hillary Clinton. Just 14% reported that they’d backed Trump.

    Initial exit poll data from the 2020 presidential election indicated that Trump had doubled his share of LGBTQ+ voters to 28%. Later analyses contradicted that finding, however, showing that LGBTQ+ voters were actually essential to Joe Biden’s victory.

    The surprising miscalculation was likely due to COVID-19-related polling errors. Exit poll data from the 2022 midterm election put LGBTQ+ support for Republican congressional candidates back at 14%.

    LGBTQ+ voters in ‘tipping-point’ states

    Taken together, past polling data indicates that the LGBTQ+ community will likely back Harris over Trump by strong margins in four of the most likely “tipping-point” states – that is, the swing states with enough electoral votes to tip the entire election for one candidate.

    Georgia, Michigan, North Carolina and Pennsylvania all have populations of LGBTQ+ adults that are significantly larger than the margin of victory by which the winning candidate took the state in 2020.

    For instance, Biden won Georgia and its 15 electoral votes by 11,779 votes in 2020, and there are over 400,000 LGBTQ+ adults in the state. Trump’s apparent current lead in Georgia is within the margin of error, and even a slight increase in Democratic-leaning LGBTQ+ voters, compared with 2020, could hand Harris the state.

    Georgia now has 16 electoral votes following a population increase.

    The gap between the two candidates in all four tipping-point states is similarly narrow – 2% or less. That’s well within state polls’ margin of error. Together, these states have a combined 66 electoral votes. That’s nearly double Biden’s Electoral College margin of victory in 2020 and Trump’s margin in 2016.

    If higher turnout among LGBTQ+ voters in these four likely tipping-point states could deliver the 2024 race for Harris, then lower LGBTQ+ turnout could pave Trump’s path to victory.

    Trump is well within striking distance in the Rust Belt states of Pennsylvania and Michigan, where polling puts him in a statistical dead heat with Harris. With those slim margins that are well within the margin of error, even a moderate decrease in turnout among the states’ many thousands of LGBTQ+ voters could cause serious problems for Harris.

    For context, Biden won Pennsylvania and Michigan by 80,555 and 154,188 votes, respectively, in 2020.

    Possible X factors

    Of course, the 2020 and 2024 presidential elections are not carbon copies of each other.

    The LGBTQ+ electorate grows each year, and by 2030 1 in 7 voters are expected to identify as LGBTQ+.

    Republicans have also ramped up legislative attacks on LGBTQ+ rights since 2020, and GOP campaign ads with anti-transgender messages dominate this election cycle. Both of these factors will play a role in 2024, as will a shake-up in the North Carolina governor’s race.

    In September, CNN reported that the Republican nominee for governor of North Carolina, Mark Robinson, had posted controversial comments on a pornographic website between 2008 and 2012. In addition to referring to himself as a “black Nazi,” Robinson said that he enjoyed watching transgender pornography.

    For a candidate whose anti-trans rhetoric includes saying transgender women should be arrested for using women’s restrooms, this was shocking news. Robinson has denied the allegation, which has severely damaged his campaign. Two weeks ahead of the election, polling gave Robinson’s Democratic opponent, Josh Stein, a clear lead over Robinson.

    Robinson’s troubled past and embattled campaign could mobilize multiple pockets of progressive North Carolinians, including LGBTQ+ voters, against him. Boosted turnout would almost certainly eat into Trump’s vote share in North Carolina – a state he won by 1.3% in 2020.

    What to expect on election night

    Historical trends, demographic data and current affairs all point toward LGBTQ+ voters playing an important – and potentially decisive – role in tipping swing states to Harris.

    Yet, there are also signs that Harris may underperform with LGBTQ+ voters.

    A September 2024 survey by the Human Rights Campaign, a LGBTQ+ advocacy organization, reported that about 20% of LGBTQ+ respondents were undecided, planning to stay home or backing a third party. Less than 8% of LGBTQ+ respondents were leaning toward Trump, but disaffected LGBTQ+ Democrats could cause problems for Harris.

    Ultimately, there’s no way to know what LGBTQ+ voters will actually do at the ballot box. This race is in flux, and plenty can happen before election day. Other voting blocs have grown or changed since 2024, too.

    The answers will come on election night or – in a race with such narrow margins of victory – in the days and weeks of counting and recounting to follow.

    Dorian Rhea Debussy does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. LGBTQ+ voters in these 4 states could swing the 2024 presidential election – https://theconversation.com/lgbtq-voters-in-these-4-states-could-swing-the-2024-presidential-election-239656

    MIL OSI – Global Reports

  • MIL-OSI Security: Defense News: USS Mobile (LCS 26) Returns to Homeport San Diego

    Source: United States Navy

    “Mobile’s maiden deployment to 7th fleet was incredibly successful, and we are extremely proud of the accomplishments of both crews,” said Capt. Douglas Meagher, commodore, Littoral Combat Ship Squadron One. “Mobile operated alongside other U.S. Navy assets as well as international allies and partners to not only strengthen our relationships but to demonstrate the tactical capabilities and strategic value of littoral combat ships.”

    Mobile participated in freedom of navigation operations in the South China Sea, maritime domain awareness and patrol alongside the Philippine Navy, Cooperation Afloat Readiness and Training (CARAT) Thailand 2023, Malaysia’s Langkawi International Maritime Aerospace Exhibition 2023 (LIMA 2023), and Noble Dingo with the Royal Australian Navy. Mobile also participated in trilateral exercises alongside the French Navy and Royal Australian Navy, multinational maritime cooperative activity exercises with Philippine Navy, Royal Australian Navy and Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force, and bilateral operations with the Royal Netherlands Navy and Italian Navy.

    “I am particularly proud of the resiliency and self-sufficiency that our Sailors demonstrated throughout the deployment,” said Cmdr. David Gardner, commanding officer of Mobile Gold crew. “Mobile operated for extensive periods of time outside of the normal U.S. Navy logistics umbrella, which necessitated deliberate planning and at times time-critical actions to ensure that Mobile was fully mission-ready despite the prolonged operations and distance from shore-based support. The man-hours and money saved through Mobile’s self-sufficiency and can-do attitude was a key to our success.”

    Mobile was showcased at the International Maritime Defense Exhibition (IMDEX) Asia 2023 at Changi Naval Base in Singapore. The exhibition included displays and tours of 22 warships from 13 countries.

    Mobile participated in CARAT Thailand 2023, a bilateral exercise between Thailand and the United States designed to promote regional security cooperation, maintain and strengthen maritime partnerships, and enhance maritime interoperability.
    Mobile was an active participant in LIMA 2023, which included industry stakeholders, government, and military officials from more than a dozen countries dedicated to the maritime and aerospace sectors for defense, civil, and commercial applications. Apart from exhibits, forums and conferences, LIMA 23 also organized various activities such as cultural exchanges, flight simulators, technology talks, and career fairs for participants.
    Mobile conducted bilateral operations with the Royal Netherlands Navy in the South China Sea to improve allied interoperability and conduct complex scenarios to improve combined readiness. The operation was followed by a separate bilateral operation with the Italian Navy that was also held in the South China Sea.

    “These Sailors are returning home to their families with significant operational experience. Given the nature of our minimally manned crew each of these Sailors has amassed hundreds of hours of experience in specialized evolutions, both in real-world events and through training while deployed,” said Gardner. “The result is Mobile Sailors are highly qualified within rate and rapidly advancing in their careers. Mobile flies both the Enlisted Surface Warfare Specialist and Surface Warfare Officer pennants as a visual indication of our highly warfare-qualified team.”

    Mobile is homeported in San Diego as a part of Littoral Combat Ship Squadron One. Littoral combat ships are fast, optimally-manned, mission-tailored surface combatants that operate in near-shore and open-ocean environments, winning against 21st-century threats. LCS integrate with joint, combined, manned and unmanned teams to support forward-presence, maritime security, sea control, and deterrence missions around the globe.
    For more news from Commander, Littoral Combat Ship Squadron One, visit https://www.surfpac.navy.mil/comlcsron1/ or follow on Facebook at https://www.facebook.com/COMLCSRONONE/.

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Enhanced partnership in trade and the digital and green transition were discussed during Nigerian Vice President’s visit to Sweden

    Source: Government of Sweden

    Enhanced partnership in trade and the digital and green transition were discussed during Nigerian Vice President’s visit to Sweden – Government.se

    Please enable javascript in your browser

    Published

    On 17–18 October, Nigerian Vice President Kashim Shettima visited Sweden to enhance cooperation in trade and investment, regional security and global issues. Minister for Foreign Affairs Maria Malmer Stenergard hosted the visit, which is an important step in strengthening the ties between the countries – not least by exploring new opportunities for cooperation in business and innovation.

    • When Nigerian Vice President Kashim Shettima visited Sweden, Minister for Foreign Affairs Maria Malmer Stenergard hosted the visit.

      Photo: Frida Drake/Government Offices

    • Minister for International Development Cooperation Benjamin Dousa had a separate meeting with and Minister of Communications, Innovation and Digital Economy Bosun Tijani.

      Photo: Frida Drake/Government Offices

    • Minister for Energy, Business and Industry and Deputy Prime Minister Ebba Busch met Nigerian Vice President Kashim Shettima and discussed trade issues.

      Photo: Frida Drake/Government Offices

    “Nigeria is undertaking an extensive green and digital transition and there are great opportunities for Swedish companies to contribute. Nigeria is a major regional and global power with a rapidly growing population. It was very valuable to have the chance to discuss enhanced cooperation in trade with Vice President Shettima, who also demonstrated impressive knowledge of Swedish history,” said Ms Malmer Stenergard.

    Nigeria is an important trade partner to Sweden in sub-Saharan Africa and is expected to be the world’s third most populous country by 2050. Sectors such as energy, information and communication technologies, environmental technology, urban planning and infrastructure hold special interest – areas in which Sweden has much to offer. At present, around 40 Swedish companies operate in Nigeria and provide solutions ranging from 5G-technology and sustainable transport to renewable energy. This cooperation is paving the way for further Swedish investments and partnerships in the country.

    “As a forerunner in an IT-driven economy in various sectors, Nigeria is well-positioned to become West Africa’s technological hub. There are numerous newly started businesses and technological development and innovation centres that showcase a rapidly growing industry. This is an opportunity that Swedish companies cannot afford to miss,” said Minister for International Development Cooperation Benjamin Dousa.

    Mr Shettima and his delegation met with several Swedish companies and other key actors during their visit to Sweden. The delegation included Executive Governor of Plateau State Caleb Manasseh Mutfwang, Nigerian Minister of Foreign Affairs Yusuf Tuggar and Minister of Communications, Innovation and Digital Economy Bosun Tijani. 

    Mr Shettima was also received by the Crown Princess and met with Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson, where issues regarding enhanced exchange and common global challenges were discussed. He also met with Minister for Energy, Business and Industry and Deputy Prime Minister Ebba Busch to discuss trade issues. Trade and investment, regional security and global issues were discussed during a lunch with Ms Maria Malmer Stenergard. Mr Dousa had a separate meeting with Mr Tijani. 

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI USA: This Week in NJ – October 25th, 2024

    Source: US State of New Jersey

    Governor Murphy Highlights More Than $1 Billion Investment in Child Care Sector

    Governor Phil Murphy highlighted that his Administration has invested more than $1 billion in expanding access to high-quality, affordable child care across New Jersey. The Governor also announced an additional $17 million in funding for the New Jersey Economic Development Authority (NJEDA) Child Care Facilities Improvement Program. With these new resources, New Jersey is dedicating more than $140 million to improve child care infrastructure, representing one of the largest investments of any state in the country. The announcement was made at a child care center in West Orange that is expanding access to services thanks to funding from the NJEDA. 

    Building on the Murphy Administration’s comprehensive strategy to support the state’s vital child care sector, the NJEDA’s Child Care Facilities Improvement Program provides grants to eligible child care providers for improvements that contribute to high quality early childhood learning environments. Through the program, which awards grants of up to $200,000, the NJEDA has approved $85 million in grants to over 400 child care centers that collectively enroll over 34,000 children and employ over 8,500 staff. With the inclusion of new funding announced, the NJEDA now anticipates another 200 centers will receive awards, bringing the total to more than 600 child care centers across all 21 New Jersey counties. Nearly a third of all awards are to centers located in Opportunity Zones.

    “Affordable, exceptional child care is a vital part of a stronger and fairer New Jersey economy, and the increased funding announced today will strengthen our state’s economic security and provide equitable opportunities to working parents,” said Governor Phil Murphy. “Increased access to high-quality child care allows more parents to return to the workforce, bolstering New Jersey’s economic growth and competitiveness. Thank you to the Biden-Harris Administration, who have provided record-high federal funding to expand access to child care, health care, and other critical resources for families in the Garden State.” 

    With the additional $17 million in Federal American Rescue Plan State Fiscal Recovery Fund funding announced, the NJEDA anticipates being able to approve all eligible child care centers that applied to Phase One of the program, which is no longer accepting new applications. A significant focus of the program is expanding or unlocking capacity within child care centers, especially for infants and toddlers. All construction work is delivered by New Jersey Department of Labor Registered Public Works Contractors and subject to prevailing wage and affirmative action monitoring.

    READ MORE

    New Jersey Slated to Get a Total of $168M for Water Infrastructure

    The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced $3.6 billion in new funding under the Biden-Harris Administration’s Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL) to upgrade water infrastructure and keep communities safe. New Jersey is slated to get more than $168 million for drinking water and wastewater improvements – including the $44 million that was announced as part of EPA’s announcement of the Lead and Copper Rule Improvements earlier this month. This BIL funding will help communities across the state upgrade water infrastructure that is essential to safely managing wastewater, protecting local freshwater resources, and delivering safe drinking water to homes, schools, and businesses. 

    These Bipartisan Infrastructure Law funds will flow through the Clean Water and Drinking Water State Revolving Funds (CWSRF and DWSRF), a long-standing federal-state water investment partnership. This multibillion-dollar investment will fund state-run, low-interest loan programs that address key challenges in financing water infrastructure. This announcement includes allotments for New Jersey’s Bipartisan Infrastructure Law Clean Water General Supplemental funds totaling $101 million, Emerging Contaminant funds totaling $8.7 million, and $13.6 million in funds under the Drinking Water Emerging Contaminant Fund. 

    “We are grateful to the Biden-Harris Administration, New Jersey’s congressional delegation, and the Environmental Protection Agency for their continued support in helping us build a cleaner and healthier Garden State through the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law,” said New Jersey Governor Phil Murphy. “This newly announced funding will help New Jersey communities with the vital tasks of ensuring that everyone in New Jersey has access to clean, safe drinking water and protecting and improving water quality throughout the state. These critical investments in our environmental infrastructure will help protect our citizens from lead and forever chemicals in drinking water, support proper management of wastewater and stormwater to protect our surface and ground waters, and create good-paying jobs for New Jerseyans.”

    READ MORE

    Governor Murphy Announces Planned Innovation Center Based in Newark

    Governor Phil Murphy announced that the New Jersey Economic Development Authority (NJEDA) and the New Jersey Innovation Institute (NJII), a corporation of the New Jersey Institute of Technology (NJIT), have launched the NJII Venture Studio, the state’s latest Strategic Innovation Center (SIC). The NJII Venture Studio will focus on accelerating and commercializing intellectual property with a focus on high technology and information technology developed by NJIT, NJII and NJIT’s corporate partners, as well as other academic institutions who contribute to the advancement of the industry. This will be the seventh SIC in New Jersey announced under the Murphy Administration.

    “Since I took office, my administration has been laser focused on positioning New Jersey as a national leader in innovation and technology development,” said Governor Phil Murphy. “The NJII Venture Studio, our seventh Strategic Innovation Center, will provide aspiring entrepreneurs with access to cutting-edge technology and the chance to collaborate with industry experts. This exciting initiative reinforces New Jersey’s reputation as a hub for innovation and research and the tremendous expertise within our state’s research universities.”

    NJII, a non-profit subsidiary corporation established by NJIT in 2014, will operate and manage the Studio. The NJEDA and NJII have entered into a non-binding term sheet to establish the creation, funding, and management of the Venture Studio with an opportunity to make equity investments into participating companies. The Studio, which will be located in the Paul Profeta Center for Innovation and Entrepreneurship in Newark, will seek to launch two to three start-ups a year over a four-year period.

    The Venture Studio will provide emerging companies with necessary business training, operating services, physical space, and management guidance to transform their research into commercially viable products and services. Pending approval by its Board, the NJEDA intends to invest $5.8 million into the project on a 1:1 basis with NJII, with program funding for the Venture Studio totaling $11.6 million.

    READ MORE

    Lt. Governor Way, Attorney General Platkin, and OHSP Director Doran Announce Safeguards to Protect the Right to Vote During the 2024 General Election

    Lieutenant Governor Tahesha Way, Attorney General Matthew J. Platkin, and New Jersey Office of Homeland Security and Preparedness (NJOHSP) Director Laurie Doran announced that the State of New Jersey will be taking a multi-pronged approach to help ensure that the 2024 General Election is fair, transparent, secure, and runs smoothly. Among the efforts highlighted are the Division of Elections Voter Information project and the Department of Law and Public Safety’s (LPS) Voter Protection Initiative.

    Presidential general elections see the highest voter participation numbers, and it is important for voters to know what to expect. New Jersey law contains many checks and balances to protect the right to vote, and the State has implemented measures that prioritize voting integrity and safety.

    “As chief election official, I am proud to work with my state and federal law enforcement and security colleagues to support our county election officials as they administer free and fair elections for all New Jersey voters,” said Lieutenant Governor Tahesha Way, who leads the New Jersey Division of Elections in her capacity as Secretary of State. “Together, we ensure that our elections are safe, secure, and free from interference. Every New Jersey voter can prepare to participate in this election by visiting vote.nj.gov and making their plan to vote.”

    “New Jersey is fully prepared to quickly and decisively identify and resolve any issues related to voting,” said Attorney General Matthew J. Platkin. “Voting is the cornerstone of our democracy and a fundamental right. We will do everything in our power to ensure every eligible voter can exercise their right to participate in the democratic process without interference.”

    “Year round, the New Jersey Office of Homeland Security and Preparedness collaborates with local, state, and federal partners through the Election Security Task Force to protect our elections and uphold our democratic processes,” said NJOHSP Director Laurie Doran. “As we prepare for the 2024 presidential election, NJOHSP and the Task Force are focused on ensuring New Jersey’s public safety and election officials are equipped to handle all threats and hazards, whether physical or cyber, foreign or domestic.”

    READ MORE

    New Jersey Board of Public Utilities Announces Adoption of Minimum Filing Requirements for Medium-and-Heavy-Duty Electric Vehicles

    The New Jersey Board of Public Utilities (NJBPU) announced on Wednesday the adoption of minimum filing requirements (MFRs) that direct the state’s investor-owned electric distribution companies (EDCs) to propose programs to expand charging access for medium-and-heavy-duty (MHD) electric vehicles (EVs) and fleets. The expansion of New Jersey’s EV charging ecosystem will catalyze the ongoing clean transition of the state’s fleet, yielding significant greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reductions within the state’s transportation sector and improving localized air quality.

    New Jersey’s transportation sector accounts for nearly 40% of the state’s net GHG emissions, with MHD trucks and busses emitting an outsized share of those emissions. Low-income neighborhoods and communities of color are more likely to be exposed to these pollutants due to their disproportionate proximity to freight corridors, ports, and distribution centers. The adopted MFRs allow utilities to provide additional “bonus” incentives for overburdened municipalities and overburdened communities adjacent to Freight EV Corridors, as well as small businesses.

    “Today’s announcement by the BPU is a key part of my Administration’s whole-of-government approach to reducing harmful emissions from the transportation sector that negatively impact the health of our residents,” said Governor Phil Murphy. “Along with New Jersey’s action on Advanced Clean Trucks and the Clean Corridors Coalition, we are building a robust charging infrastructure for a clean transportation future.”

    “Under Governor Murphy’s leadership and in coordination with New Jersey’s EDCs, the NJBPU remains at the forefront of advancing smart, clean transportation initiatives and infrastructure that provide considerable health and environmental benefits,” said NJBPU President Christine Guhl-Sadovy. “These benefits are especially vital to the overburdened communities that have borne the brunt of air pollution and its health effects for far too long.”

    READ MORE

    MIL OSI USA News