NewzIntel.com

    • Checkout Page
    • Contact Us
    • Default Redirect Page
    • Frontpage
    • Home-2
    • Home-3
    • Lost Password
    • Member Login
    • Member LogOut
    • Member TOS Page
    • My Account
    • NewzIntel Alert Control-Panel
    • NewzIntel Latest Reports
    • Post Views Counter
    • Privacy Policy
    • Public Individual Page
    • Register
    • Subscription Plan
    • Thank You Page

Category: Politics

  • MIL-OSI: Midland States Bancorp, Inc. Announces 2024 Third Quarter Results

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Third Quarter 2024 Highlights:

    • Net income available to common shareholders of $16.2 million, or $0.74 per diluted share
    • Adjusted pre-tax, pre-provision earnings of $27.5 million
    • Tangible book value per share increased to $24.90, compared to $23.36 at June 30, 2024
    • Common equity tier 1 capital ratio improved to 9.00%, compared to 8.64% at June 30, 2024
    • Net interest margin of 3.10%, compared to 3.12% in prior quarter
    • Efficiency ratio of 62.8%, compared to 65.2% in prior quarter

    EFFINGHAM, Ill., Oct. 24, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Midland States Bancorp, Inc. (Nasdaq: MSBI) (the “Company”) today reported net income available to common shareholders of $16.2 million, or $0.74 per diluted share, for the third quarter of 2024, compared to $4.5 million, or $0.20 per diluted share, for the second quarter of 2024. This also compares to net income available to common shareholders of $9.2 million, or $0.41 per diluted share, for the third quarter of 2023.

    Provision expense was $5.0 million in the third quarter of 2024 compared to $16.8 million and $5.2 million in the second quarter of 2024 and the third quarter of 2023, respectively. The elevated provision expense in the second quarter of 2024 was primarily due to credit deterioration and servicing issues involving one of our fintech partners, LendingPoint, subsequent to their system conversion in late 2023.

    Jeffrey G. Ludwig, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, said, “We executed well in the third quarter and delivered a higher level of profitability while making continued progress on our balance sheet management strategies, which resulted in further increases in all of our capital ratios, an increase in our tangible book value per share, and an increase in our level of liquidity with a reduction in our loan-to-deposit ratio. We continue to utilize the payoffs resulting from the intentional reduction of our equipment finance and consumer portfolios to fund high quality loans generated in our community bank and the purchase of investment securities. We are also seeing good results from the investments we have made in the business, such as increasing our presence and business development efforts in the St. Louis market, where our loan balances increased at an annualized rate of 12% during the third quarter, and growth in our Wealth Management revenues due to an increase in assets under administration, partially driven by the new wealth advisors we have added in recent quarters.

    Improving our credit quality is a priority and we are taking proactive steps to resolve problem loans in order to reduce our level of non-performing and classified loans going forward. We continue to closely monitor the health of our borrowers and be conservative in downgrading loans where we see the potential for weakness. We also recently added a new Chief Credit Officer whose background and experience is consistent with our increased focus on in-market relationship lending in our community bank, which will continue to result in a higher quality, lower risk loan portfolio.

    “While we will remain conservative in new loan production while economic conditions remain uncertain, we are well positioned to benefit from lower interest rates and we expect positive trends in our net interest margin and revenue generated from our Wealth Management business. While maintaining disciplined expense control, we are continuing to make investments in talent and technology that will further enhance our ability to increase our market share, add attractive new client relationships in our community bank, and generate profitable growth. With the stronger balance sheet we are building, including a Total Capital Ratio of approximately 14%, we believe we are well positioned to support the continued growth of our franchise as economic conditions improve in the future and create additional value for our shareholders in the process,” said Mr. Ludwig.

    Balance Sheet Highlights

    Total assets were $7.75 billion at September 30, 2024, compared to $7.76 billion at June 30, 2024, and $7.97 billion at September 30, 2023. At September 30, 2024, portfolio loans were $5.75 billion, compared to $5.85 billion at June 30, 2024, and $6.28 billion at September 30, 2023.

    Loans

    During the third quarter of 2024, outstanding loans declined by $103.2 million, or 1.8%, from June 30, 2024, as the Company continued to shrink its equipment financing and consumer loan portfolios, and focus on commercial loan opportunities in our community banking regions.

    Equipment finance loan and lease balances decreased $30.0 million during the third quarter of 2024 as the Company continued to reduce its concentration of this product within the overall loan portfolio. Consumer loans decreased $82.8 million due to loan payoffs and a cessation in loans originated through GreenSky. Our Greensky-originated loan balances decreased $63.0 million during the third quarter to $475.3 million at September 30, 2024. In addition, as previously disclosed, during the fourth quarter of 2023, the Company ceased originating loans through LendingPoint. As of September 30, 2024, the Company had $96.5 million in loans that were originated through and serviced by LendingPoint. Equipment financing and consumer loans comprised 15.0% and 11.5%, respectively, of the loan portfolio at September 30, 2024, compared to 15.2% and 12.7%, respectively, at June 30, 2024.

    Increases in commercial FHA warehouse lines and commercial real estate loans of $50.2 million and $89.0 million, respectively, were offset by decreases in all other loan categories.

        As of
        September 30,   June 30,   March 31,   December 31,   September 30,
    (in thousands)   2024   2024   2024   2023   2023
    Loan Portfolio                    
    Commercial loans   $ 863,922   $ 939,458   $ 913,564   $ 951,387   $ 943,761
    Equipment finance loans     442,552     461,409     494,068     531,143     578,931
    Equipment finance leases     417,531     428,659     455,879     473,350     485,460
    Commercial FHA warehouse lines     50,198     —     8,035     —     48,547
    Total commercial loans and leases     1,774,203     1,829,526     1,871,546     1,955,880     2,056,699
    Commercial real estate     2,510,472     2,421,505     2,397,113     2,406,845     2,412,164
    Construction and land development     422,253     476,528     474,128     452,593     416,801
    Residential real estate     378,657     378,393     378,583     380,583     375,211
    Consumer     663,234     746,042     837,092     935,178     1,020,008
    Total loans   $ 5,748,819   $ 5,851,994   $ 5,958,462   $ 6,131,079   $ 6,280,883


    Loan Quality

    Overall, credit quality metrics remained consistent this quarter compared to the second quarter of 2024, albeit, nonperforming loans were still at elevated levels. Non-performing loans increased $2.4 million to $114.6 million at September 30, 2024, compared to $112.1 million as of June 30, 2024. Substandard loans increased $32.0 million to $167.5 million at September 30, 2024, as compared to June 30, 2024, primarily due to two multi-family projects that were downgraded this past quarter.

        As of and for the Three Months Ended
    (in thousands)   September 30,   June 30,   March 31,   December 31,   September 30,
        2024       2024       2024       2023       2023  
    Asset Quality                    
    Loans 30-89 days past due   $ 55,329     $ 54,045     $ 58,854     $ 82,778     $ 46,608  
    Nonperforming loans     114,556       112,124       104,979       56,351       55,981  
    Nonperforming assets     126,771       123,774       116,721       67,701       58,677  
    Substandard loans     167,549       135,555       149,049       184,224       143,793  
    Net charge-offs     11,379       2,874       4,445       5,117       3,449  
    Loans 30-89 days past due to total loans     0.96 %     0.92 %     0.99 %     1.35 %     0.74 %
    Nonperforming loans to total loans     1.99 %     1.92 %     1.76 %     0.92 %     0.89 %
    Nonperforming assets to total assets     1.64 %     1.60 %     1.49 %     0.86 %     0.74 %
    Allowance for credit losses to total loans     1.49 %     1.58 %     1.31 %     1.12 %     1.06 %
    Allowance for credit losses to nonperforming loans     74.90 %     82.22 %     74.35 %     121.56 %     119.09 %
    Net charge-offs to average loans     0.78 %     0.20 %     0.30 %     0.33 %     0.22 %

    The allowance for credit losses on loans totaled $85.8 million at September 30, 2024, compared to $92.2 million at June 30, 2024, and $66.7 million at September 30, 2023. The allowance as a percentage of total loans was 1.49% at September 30, 2024, compared to 1.58% at June 30, 2024, and 1.06% at September 30, 2023.

    Notably, the Company recognized provision expense of $14.0 million in the second quarter of 2024 related to the loans originated and serviced by LendingPoint, increasing the allowance to $14.6 million on this portfolio. Credit deterioration and servicing issues following their system conversion have resulted in increased losses within this portfolio. In the third quarter of 2024, loans totaling $6.2 million were charged off. At September 30, 2024, the Company had an allowance of $8.3 million on the $96.5 million of loans serviced by LendingPoint.

    Deposits

    Total deposits were $6.26 billion at September 30, 2024, compared with $6.12 billion at June 30, 2024. Noninterest-bearing deposits decreased $57.9 million to $1.05 billion at September 30, 2024, while interest-bearing deposits increased $196.7 million to $5.21 billion at September 30, 2024. Brokered time deposits increased $138.0 million to $269.4 million, and represented 4.31% of total deposits at September 30, 2024.

        As of
        September 30,   June 30,   March 31,   December 31,   September 30,
    (in thousands)   2024   2024   2024   2023   2023
    Deposit Portfolio                    
    Noninterest-bearing demand   $ 1,050,617   $ 1,108,521   $ 1,212,382   $ 1,145,395   $ 1,154,515
    Interest-bearing:                    
    Checking     2,389,970     2,343,533     2,394,163     2,511,840     2,572,224
    Money market     1,187,139     1,143,668     1,128,463     1,135,629     1,090,962
    Savings     510,260     538,462     555,552     559,267     582,359
    Time     849,413     852,415     845,190     862,865     885,858
    Brokered time     269,437     131,424     188,234     94,533     119,084
    Total deposits   $ 6,256,836   $ 6,118,023   $ 6,323,984   $ 6,309,529   $ 6,405,002


    Results of Operations Highlights

    Net Interest Income and Margin

    During the third quarter of 2024, net interest income and net interest margin, on a tax-equivalent basis, were $55.2 million and 3.10%, respectively, compared to $55.2 million and 3.12%, respectively, in the second quarter of 2024. Net interest income and net interest margin, on a tax-equivalent basis, were $58.8 million and 3.20%, respectively, in the third quarter of 2023.

    Average interest-earning assets for the third quarter of 2024 were $7.07 billion, compared to $7.13 billion for the second quarter of 2024. The yield on interest-earning assets increased 7 basis points to 5.91% compared to the second quarter of 2024. Interest-earning assets averaged $7.28 billion for the third quarter of 2023.

    Average loans were $5.78 billion for the third quarter of 2024, compared to $5.92 billion for the second quarter of 2024 and $6.30 billion for the third quarter of 2023. The yield on loans was 6.15% for the third quarter of 2024, up from 6.03% for the second quarter of 2024 and 5.93% for the third quarter of 2023.

    Investment securities averaged $1.16 billion for the third quarter of 2024, and yielded 4.71%, compared to an average balance and yield of $1.10 billion and 4.69%, respectively, for the second quarter of 2024. The Company purchased additional higher-yielding investments resulting in the increased average balance and yield. Investment securities averaged $863.0 million for the third quarter of 2023.

    Average interest-bearing liabilities for the third quarter of 2024 were $5.76 billion, compared to $5.78 billion for the second quarter of 2024. The cost of funds increased 9 basis points to 3.45% compared to the second quarter of 2024. Interest-bearing liabilities averaged $5.92 billion for the third quarter of 2023.

    Average interest-bearing deposits were $5.13 billion for the third quarter of 2024, compared to $5.10 billion for the second quarter of 2024, and $5.35 billion for the third quarter of 2023. Cost of interest-bearing deposits was 3.25% in the third quarter of 2024, which represented a 14 basis point increase from the second quarter of 2024, due to increased competition.

        For the Three Months Ended
    (dollars in thousands)   September 30, 2024   June 30, 2024   September 30, 2023
    Interest-earning assets   Average Balance   Interest & Fees   Yield/Rate   Average Balance   Interest & Fees   Yield/Rate   Average Balance   Interest & Fees   Yield/Rate
    Cash and cash equivalents   $ 75,255   $ 1,031   5.45 %   $ 65,250   $ 875   5.40 %   $ 78,391   $ 1,036   5.24 %
    Investment securities(1)     1,162,751     13,752   4.71       1,098,452     12,805   4.69       862,998     7,822   3.60  
    Loans(1)(2)     5,783,408     89,344   6.15       5,915,523     88,738   6.03       6,297,568     94,118   5.93  
    Loans held for sale     7,505     124   6.57       4,910     84   6.84       6,078     104   6.80  
    Nonmarketable equity securities     41,137     788   7.62       44,216     963   8.76       39,347     710   7.16  
    Total interest-earning assets     7,070,056     105,039   5.91       7,128,351     103,465   5.84       7,284,382     103,790   5.65  
    Noninterest-earning assets     653,279             669,370             622,969        
    Total assets   $ 7,723,335           $ 7,797,721           $ 7,907,351        
                                         
    Interest-Bearing Liabilities                                    
    Interest-bearing deposits   $ 5,132,640   $ 41,970   3.25 %   $ 5,101,365   $ 39,476   3.11 %   $ 5,354,356   $ 37,769   2.80 %
    Short-term borrowings     53,577     602   4.47       30,449     308   4.07       20,127     14   0.28  
    FHLB advances & other borrowings     428,739     4,743   4.40       500,758     5,836   4.69       402,500     4,557   4.49  
    Subordinated debt     89,120     1,228   5.48       93,090     1,265   5.47       93,441     1,280   5.43  
    Trust preferred debentures     50,990     1,341   10.46       50,921     1,358   10.73       50,379     1,369   10.78  
    Total interest-bearing liabilities     5,755,066     49,884   3.45       5,776,583     48,243   3.36       5,920,803     44,989   3.01  
    Noninterest-bearing deposits     1,075,712             1,132,451             1,116,988        
    Other noninterest-bearing liabilities     97,235             104,841             97,935        
    Shareholders’ equity     795,322             783,846             771,625        
    Total liabilities and shareholder’s equity   $ 7,723,335           $ 7,797,721           $ 7,907,351        
                                         
    Net Interest Margin       $ 55,155   3.10 %       $ 55,222   3.12 %       $ 58,801   3.20 %
                                         
    Cost of Deposits           2.69 %           2.55 %           2.32 %

    (1) Interest income and average rates for tax-exempt loans and investment securities are presented on a tax-equivalent basis, assuming a federal income tax rate of 21%. Tax-equivalent adjustments totaled $0.2 million for each of the three months ended September 30, 2024, June 30, 2024 and September 30, 2023, respectively.
    (2) Average loan balances include nonaccrual loans. Interest income on loans includes amortization of deferred loan fees, net of deferred loan costs.

    For the nine months ended September 30, 2024, net interest income, on a tax-equivalent basis, decreased to $166.5 million, with a tax-equivalent net interest margin of 3.13%, compared to net interest income, on a tax-equivalent basis, of $178.6 million, and a tax-equivalent net interest margin of 3.27% for the nine months ended September 30, 2023.

    The yield on earning assets increased 34 basis points to 5.84% for the nine months ended September 30, 2024 compared to the prior year. However, the cost of interest-bearing liabilities increased at a faster rate during this period, increasing 57 basis points to 3.34% for the nine months ended September 30, 2024.

        For the Nine Months Ended
    (dollars in thousands)   September 30, 2024   September 30, 2023
    Interest-earning assets   Average Balance   Interest & Fees   Yield/Rate   Average Balance   Interest & Fees   Yield/Rate
    Cash and cash equivalents   $ 69,960   $ 2,857   5.45 %   $ 76,939   $ 2,868   4.98 %
    Investment securities(1)     1,083,597     37,265   4.59       844,946     21,103   3.33  
    Loans(1)(2)     5,903,216     267,570   6.05       6,324,578     274,005   5.79  
    Loans held for sale     5,281     263   6.65       3,900     179   6.14  
    Nonmarketable equity securities     40,429     2,438   8.06       44,034     2,104   6.39  
    Total interest-earning assets     7,102,483     310,393   5.84       7,294,397     300,259   5.50  
    Noninterest-earning assets     663,967             615,383        
    Total assets   $ 7,766,450           $ 7,909,780        
                             
    Interest-Bearing Liabilities                        
    Interest-bearing deposits   $ 5,142,979   $ 120,660   3.13 %   $ 5,223,852   $ 97,791   2.50 %
    Short-term borrowings     49,750     1,746   4.69       26,865     53   0.26  
    FHLB advances & other borrowings     414,259     13,615   4.39       471,084     15,959   4.53  
    Subordinated debt     91,921     3,773   5.48       96,820     3,985   5.49  
    Trust preferred debentures     50,873     4,088   10.73       50,216     3,887   10.35  
    Total interest-bearing liabilities     5,749,782     143,882   3.34       5,868,837     121,675   2.77  
    Noninterest-bearing deposits     1,119,764             1,184,410        
    Other noninterest-bearing liabilities     107,192             84,650        
    Shareholders’ equity     789,712             771,883        
    Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity   $ 7,766,450           $ 7,909,780        
                             
    Net Interest Margin       $ 166,511   3.13 %       $ 178,584   3.27 %
                             
    Cost of Deposits           2.57 %           2.04 %

    (1) Interest income and average rates for tax-exempt loans and investment securities are presented on a tax-equivalent basis, assuming a federal income tax rate of 21%. Tax-equivalent adjustments totaled $0.6 million for each of the nine months ended September 30, 2024 and 2023, respectively.
    (2) Average loan balances include nonaccrual loans. Interest income on loans includes amortization of deferred loan fees, net of deferred loan costs.

    Noninterest Income

    Noninterest income was $19.3 million for the third quarter of 2024, compared to $17.7 million for the second quarter of 2024. Noninterest income for the second quarter of 2024 included a $0.2 million gain on the repurchase of subordinated debt, offset by $0.2 million of net losses on the sale of investment securities. The third quarter of 2023 included $5.0 million of losses on the sale of investment securities. Excluding these transactions, noninterest income for the third quarter of 2024, the second quarter of 2024, and the third quarter of 2023 was $19.3 million, $17.6 million, and $16.5 million, respectively.

        For the Three Months Ended   For the Nine Months Ended
        September 30,   June 30,   September 30,   September 30,   September 30,
    (in thousands)     2024       2024       2023       2024       2023  
    Noninterest income                    
    Wealth management revenue   $ 7,104     $ 6,801     $ 6,288     $ 21,037     $ 18,968  
    Service charges on deposit accounts     3,411       3,121       3,149       9,648       8,744  
    Interchange revenue     3,506       3,563       3,609       10,427       10,717  
    Residential mortgage banking revenue     697       557       507       1,781       1,452  
    Income on company-owned life insurance     1,982       1,925       918       5,708       2,685  
    Loss on sales of investment securities, net     (44 )     (152 )     (4,961 )     (196 )     (6,478 )
    Other income     2,683       1,841       2,035       9,777       9,989  
    Total noninterest income   $ 19,339     $ 17,656     $ 11,545     $ 58,182     $ 46,077  

    Wealth management revenue totaled $7.1 million in the third quarter of 2024, an increase of $0.3 million, or 4.5%, as compared to the second quarter of 2024, due to increases in assets under administration and estate fees. Assets under administration increased to $4.27 billion at September 30, 2024 from $4.00 billion at June 30, 2024, primarily due to improved sales activity. Assets under administration totaled $3.50 billion at September 30, 2023.

    Income on company-owned life insurance income totaled $2.0 million, $1.9 million and $0.9 million for the third quarter of 2024, the second quarter of 2024, and the third quarter of 2023, respectively. The Company surrendered certain low-yielding life insurance policies and purchased additional policies in the third quarter of 2023, resulting in the increase in revenue.

    Other income totaled $2.7 million in the third quarter of 2024 compared to $1.8 million in the second quarter of 2024. Income from the sale of SBA loans in the third quarter of 2024 of $0.2 million and losses from the disposition of repossessed leased assets in the second quarter of 2024 of $0.6 million resulted in the quarter over quarter increase in other income.

    Noninterest Expense

    Noninterest expense was $46.7 million in the third quarter of 2024, compared to $47.5 million in the second quarter of 2024 and $42.0 million in the third quarter of 2023. Noninterest expense for the second quarter of 2024 included $4.1 million of aggregate expenses related to OREO impairment and property taxes, and accruals related to various legal proceedings. Excluding these items, noninterest expense for the third quarter of 2024, the second quarter of 2024, and the third quarter of 2023 was $46.7 million, $43.4 million, and $42.0 million, respectively. Costs related to increased staffing levels, upgrades to our ATM fleet, and loan collection and OREO expenses drove the increase in noninterest expense in the third quarter of 2024 compared to the prior quarter.

    The efficiency ratio improved to 62.76% for the quarter ended September 30, 2024, compared to 65.16% for the quarter ended June 30, 2024. The efficiency ratio for the third quarter of 2023 was 55.82%.

        For the Three Months Ended   For the Nine Months Ended
        September 30,   June 30,   September 30,   September 30,   September 30,
    (in thousands)   2024   2024   2023   2024   2023
    Noninterest expense                    
    Salaries and employee benefits   $ 24,382   $ 22,872   $ 22,307   $ 71,356   $ 69,407
    Occupancy and equipment     4,393     3,964     3,730     12,499     12,052
    Data processing     6,955     7,205     6,468     20,882     19,323
    Professional services     1,744     2,243     1,554     6,242     4,977
    Amortization of intangible assets     951     1,016     1,129     3,056     3,628
    FDIC insurance     1,402     1,219     1,107     3,895     3,632
    Other expense     6,906     8,960     5,743     21,149     16,395
    Total noninterest expense   $ 46,733   $ 47,479   $ 42,038   $ 139,079   $ 129,414


    Income Tax Expense

    Income tax expense was $4.1 million for the third quarter of 2024, compared to $1.7 million for the second quarter of 2024 and $11.5 million for the third quarter of 2023. The resulting effective tax rates were 18.1%, 19.9% and 50.3%, respectively. Tax expense for the third quarter of 2023 included a $1.4 million return to provision adjustment and $4.5 million associated with the surrender of company-owned life insurance policies, as previously discussed.

    Capital

    At September 30, 2024, Midland States Bank and the Company exceeded all regulatory capital requirements under Basel III, and Midland States Bank met the qualifications to be a ‘‘well-capitalized’’ financial institution, as summarized in the following table:

      As of September 30, 2024
      Midland States Bank   Midland States Bancorp, Inc.   Minimum Regulatory Requirements(2)
    Total capital to risk-weighted assets 13.34%   13.98%   10.50%
    Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets 12.09%   11.65%   8.50%
    Common equity Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets 12.09%   9.00%   7.00%
    Tier 1 leverage ratio 10.47%   10.10%   4.00%
    Tangible common equity to tangible assets(1) N/A   7.03%   N/A

    (1) A non-GAAP financial measure. Refer to page 16 for a reconciliation to the comparable GAAP financial measure.
    (2) Includes the capital conservation buffer of 2.5%, as applicable.

    The impact of rising interest rates on the Company’s investment portfolio and cash flow hedges resulted in an accumulated other comprehensive loss of $60.6 million at September 30, 2024, which reduced tangible book value by $2.84 per share.

    Stock Repurchase Program

    As previously disclosed, on December 5, 2023, the Company’s board of directors authorized a new share repurchase program, pursuant to which the Company is authorized to repurchase up to $25.0 million of common stock through December 31, 2024. During the third quarter of 2024, the Company repurchased 23,113 shares of its common stock at a weighted average price of $22.54 under its stock repurchase program.

    About Midland States Bancorp, Inc.

    Midland States Bancorp, Inc. is a community-based financial holding company headquartered in Effingham, Illinois, and is the sole shareholder of Midland States Bank. As of September 30, 2024, the Company had total assets of approximately $7.75 billion, and its Wealth Management Group had assets under administration of approximately $4.27 billion. The Company provides a full range of commercial and consumer banking products and services and business equipment financing, merchant credit card services, trust and investment management, insurance and financial planning services. For additional information, visit https://www.midlandsb.com/ or https://www.linkedin.com/company/midland-states-bank.

    Non-GAAP Financial Measures

    Some of the financial measures included in this press release are not measures of financial performance recognized in accordance with GAAP.

    These non-GAAP financial measures include “Adjusted Earnings,” “Adjusted Earnings Available to Common Shareholders,” “Adjusted Diluted Earnings Per Common Share,” “Adjusted Return on Average Assets,” “Adjusted Return on Average Shareholders’ Equity,” “Adjusted Return on Average Tangible Common Equity,” “Adjusted Pre-Tax, Pre-Provision Earnings,” “Adjusted Pre-Tax, Pre-Provision Return on Average Assets,” “Efficiency Ratio,” “Tangible Common Equity to Tangible Assets,” “Tangible Book Value Per Share,” “Tangible Book Value Per Share excluding Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income,” and “Return on Average Tangible Common Equity.” The Company believes these non-GAAP financial measures provide both management and investors a more complete understanding of the Company’s funding profile and profitability. These non-GAAP financial measures are supplemental and are not a substitute for any analysis based on GAAP financial measures. Not all companies use the same calculation of these measures; therefore, the measures in this press release may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures as presented by other companies.

    Forward-Looking Statements

    Readers should note that in addition to the historical information contained herein, this press release includes “forward-looking statements” within the meanings of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, including but not limited to statements about the Company’s plans, objectives, future performance, goals and future earnings levels. These statements are subject to many risks and uncertainties, including changes in interest rates and other general economic, business and political conditions, the impact of inflation, increased deposit volatility and potential regulatory developments; changes in the financial markets; changes in business plans as circumstances warrant; risks relating to acquisitions; changes to U.S. tax laws, regulations and guidance; and other risks detailed from time to time in filings made by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Readers should note that the forward-looking statements included in this press release are not a guarantee of future events, and that actual events may differ materially from those made in or suggested by the forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements generally can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “will,” “propose,” “may,” “plan,” “seek,” “expect,” “intend,” “estimate,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “continue,” or similar terminology. Any forward-looking statements presented herein are made only as of the date of this press release, and the Company does not undertake any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements to reflect changes in assumptions, the occurrence of unanticipated events, or otherwise.

    CONTACTS:
    Jeffrey G. Ludwig, President and CEO, at jludwig@midlandsb.com or (217) 342-7321
    Eric T. Lemke, Chief Financial Officer, at elemke@midlandsb.com or (217) 342-7321
    Douglas J. Tucker, SVP and Corporate Counsel, at dtucker@midlandsb.com or (217) 342-7321

    MIDLAND STATES BANCORP, INC.
    CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL SUMMARY (unaudited)
                         
        As of and for the Three Months Ended   As of and
    for the Nine Months Ended
        September 30,   June 30,   September 30,   September 30,   September 30,
    (dollars in thousands, except per share data)     2024       2024       2023       2024       2023  
    Earnings Summary                    
    Net interest income   $ 54,950     $ 55,052     $ 58,596     $ 165,922     $ 177,940  
    Provision for credit losses     5,000       16,800       5,168       35,800       14,182  
    Noninterest income     19,339       17,656       11,545       58,182       46,077  
    Noninterest expense     46,733       47,479       42,038       139,079       129,414  
    Income before income taxes     22,556       8,429       22,935       49,225       80,421  
    Income taxes     4,080       1,679       11,533       10,114       25,672  
    Net income     18,476       6,750       11,402       39,111       54,749  
    Preferred dividends     2,229       2,228       2,229       6,685       6,685  
    Net income available to common shareholders   $ 16,247     $ 4,522     $ 9,173     $ 32,426     $ 48,064  
                         
    Diluted earnings per common share   $ 0.74     $ 0.20     $ 0.41     $ 1.47     $ 2.14  
    Weighted average common shares outstanding – diluted     21,678,242       21,734,849       21,977,196       21,732,093       22,223,986  
    Return on average assets     0.95 %     0.35 %     0.57 %     0.67 %     0.93 %
    Return on average shareholders’ equity     9.24 %     3.46 %     5.86 %     6.62 %     9.48 %
    Return on average tangible common equity(1)     12.69 %     3.66 %     7.56 %     8.62 %     13.37 %
    Net interest margin     3.10 %     3.12 %     3.20 %     3.13 %     3.27 %
    Efficiency ratio(1)     62.76 %     65.16 %     55.82 %     61.91 %     56.15 %
                         
    Adjusted Earnings Performance Summary(1)                    
    Adjusted earnings available to common shareholders   $ 16,223     $ 4,511     $ 17,278     $ 32,391     $ 56,783  
    Adjusted diluted earnings per common share   $ 0.74     $ 0.20     $ 0.78     $ 1.47     $ 2.53  
    Adjusted return on average assets     0.95 %     0.35 %     0.98 %     0.67 %     1.07 %
    Adjusted return on average shareholders’ equity     9.23 %     3.46 %     10.03 %     6.61 %     10.99 %
    Adjusted return on average tangible common equity     12.67 %     3.65 %     14.24 %     8.61 %     15.80 %
    Adjusted pre-tax, pre-provision earnings   $ 27,523     $ 25,214     $ 33,064     $ 84,977     $ 100,405  
    Adjusted pre-tax, pre-provision return on average assets     1.42 %     1.30 %     1.66 %     1.46 %     1.70 %
                         
    Market Data                    
    Book value per share at period end   $ 33.08     $ 31.59     $ 29.96          
    Tangible book value per share at period end(1)   $ 24.90     $ 23.36     $ 21.67          
    Tangible book value per share excluding accumulated other comprehensive income at period end(1)   $ 27.74     $ 27.22     $ 26.35          
    Market price at period end   $ 22.38     $ 22.65     $ 20.54          
    Common shares outstanding at period end     21,393,905       21,377,215       21,594,546          
                         
    Capital                    
    Total capital to risk-weighted assets     13.98 %     13.83 %     12.76 %        
    Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets     11.65 %     11.23 %     10.53 %        
    Common equity tier 1capital to risk-weighted assets     9.00 %     8.64 %     8.07 %        
    Tier 1 leverage ratio     10.10 %     9.84 %     9.59 %        
    Tangible common equity to tangible assets(1)     7.03 %     6.59 %     6.01 %        
                         
    Wealth Management                    
    Trust assets under administration   $ 4,268,539     $ 3,996,175     $ 3,501,225          

    (1) Non-GAAP financial measures. Refer to pages 14 – 16 for a reconciliation to the comparable GAAP financial measures.

    MIDLAND STATES BANCORP, INC.
    CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL SUMMARY (unaudited) (continued)
                         
        As of
        September 30,   June 30,   March 31,   December 31,   September 30,
    (in thousands)     2024       2024       2024       2023       2023  
    Assets                    
    Cash and cash equivalents   $ 121,873     $ 124,646     $ 167,316     $ 135,061     $ 132,132  
    Investment securities     1,216,795       1,099,654       1,044,900       920,396       839,344  
    Loans     5,748,819       5,851,994       5,958,462       6,131,079       6,280,883  
    Allowance for credit losses on loans     (85,804 )     (92,183 )     (78,057 )     (68,502 )     (66,669 )
    Total loans, net     5,663,015       5,759,811       5,880,405       6,062,577       6,214,214  
    Loans held for sale     8,001       5,555       5,043       3,811       6,089  
    Premises and equipment, net     84,672       83,040       81,831       82,814       82,741  
    Other real estate owned     8,646       8,304       8,920       9,112       480  
    Loan servicing rights, at lower of cost or fair value     18,400       18,902       19,577       20,253       20,933  
    Goodwill     161,904       161,904       161,904       161,904       161,904  
    Other intangible assets, net     13,052       14,003       15,019       16,108       17,238  
    Company-owned life insurance     209,193       207,211       205,286       203,485       201,750  
    Other assets     245,932       274,244       241,608       251,347       292,460  
    Total assets   $ 7,751,483     $ 7,757,274     $ 7,831,809     $ 7,866,868     $ 7,969,285  
                         
    Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity                    
    Noninterest-bearing demand deposits   $ 1,050,617     $ 1,108,521     $ 1,212,382     $ 1,145,395     $ 1,154,515  
    Interest-bearing deposits     5,206,219       5,009,502       5,111,602       5,164,134       5,250,487  
    Total deposits     6,256,836       6,118,023       6,323,984       6,309,529       6,405,002  
    Short-term borrowings     13,849       7,208       214,446       34,865       17,998  
    FHLB advances and other borrowings     425,000       600,000       255,000       476,000       538,000  
    Subordinated debt     82,744       91,656       93,617       93,546       93,475  
    Trust preferred debentures     51,058       50,921       50,790       50,616       50,457  
    Other liabilities     103,737       103,694       102,966       110,459       106,743  
    Total liabilities     6,933,224       6,971,502       7,040,803       7,075,015       7,211,675  
    Total shareholders’ equity     818,259       785,772       791,006       791,853       757,610  
    Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity   $ 7,751,483     $ 7,757,274     $ 7,831,809     $ 7,866,868     $ 7,969,285  
    MIDLAND STATES BANCORP, INC.
    CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL SUMMARY (unaudited) (continued)
                         
        For the Three Months Ended   For the Nine Months Ended
        September 30,   June 30,   September 30,   September 30,   September 30,
    (in thousands, except per share data)     2024       2024       2023       2024       2023  
    Net interest income:                    
    Interest income   $ 104,834     $ 103,295     $ 103,585     $ 309,804     $ 299,615  
    Interest expense     49,884       48,243       44,989       143,882       121,675  
    Net interest income     54,950       55,052       58,596       165,922       177,940  
    Provision for credit losses on loans     5,000       17,000       5,168       36,000       14,182  
    Provision for credit losses on unfunded commitments     —       (200 )     —       (200 )     —  
    Total provision for credit losses     5,000       16,800       5,168       35,800       14,182  
    Net interest income after provision for credit losses     49,950       38,252       53,428       130,122       163,758  
    Noninterest income:                    
    Wealth management revenue     7,104       6,801       6,288       21,037       18,968  
    Service charges on deposit accounts     3,411       3,121       3,149       9,648       8,744  
    Interchange revenue     3,506       3,563       3,609       10,427       10,717  
    Residential mortgage banking revenue     697       557       507       1,781       1,452  
    Income on company-owned life insurance     1,982       1,925       918       5,708       2,685  
    Loss on sales of investment securities, net     (44 )     (152 )     (4,961 )     (196 )     (6,478 )
    Other income     2,683       1,841       2,035       9,777       9,989  
    Total noninterest income     19,339       17,656       11,545       58,182       46,077  
    Noninterest expense:                    
    Salaries and employee benefits     24,382       22,872       22,307       71,356       69,407  
    Occupancy and equipment     4,393       3,964       3,730       12,499       12,052  
    Data processing     6,955       7,205       6,468       20,882       19,323  
    Professional services     1,744       2,243       1,554       6,242       4,977  
    Amortization of intangible assets     951       1,016       1,129       3,056       3,628  
    FDIC insurance     1,402       1,219       1,107       3,895       3,632  
    Other expense     6,906       8,960       5,743       21,149       16,395  
    Total noninterest expense     46,733       47,479       42,038       139,079       129,414  
    Income before income taxes     22,556       8,429       22,935       49,225       80,421  
    Income taxes     4,080       1,679       11,533       10,114       25,672  
    Net income     18,476       6,750       11,402       39,111       54,749  
    Preferred stock dividends     2,229       2,228       2,229       6,685       6,685  
    Net income available to common shareholders   $ 16,247     $ 4,522     $ 9,173     $ 32,426     $ 48,064  
                         
    Basic earnings per common share   $ 0.74     $ 0.20     $ 0.41     $ 1.47     $ 2.14  
    Diluted earnings per common share   $ 0.74     $ 0.20     $ 0.41     $ 1.47     $ 2.14  
    MIDLAND STATES BANCORP, INC.
    RECONCILIATIONS OF NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES (unaudited)
                         
    Adjusted Earnings Reconciliation
                         
        For the Three Months Ended   For the Nine Months Ended
    (dollars in thousands, except per share data)    September 30,
    2024
     
       June 30,
    2024
     
       September 30,
    2023
     
       September 30,
    2024
     
       September 30,
    2023
     
    Income before income taxes – GAAP   $ 22,556     $ 8,429     $ 22,935     $ 49,225     $ 80,421  
    Adjustments to noninterest income:                    
    Loss on sales of investment securities, net     44       152       4,961       196       6,478  
    (Gain) on repurchase of subordinated debt     (77 )     (167 )     —       (244 )     (676 )
    Total adjustments to noninterest income     (33 )     (15 )     4,961       (48 )     5,802  
    Adjusted earnings pre tax – non-GAAP     22,523       8,414       27,896       49,177       86,223  
    Adjusted earnings tax     4,071       1,675       8,389       10,101       22,755  
    Adjusted earnings – non-GAAP     18,452       6,739       19,507       39,076       63,468  
    Preferred stock dividends     2,229       2,228       2,229       6,685       6,685  
    Adjusted earnings available to common shareholders   $ 16,223     $ 4,511     $ 17,278     $ 32,391     $ 56,783  
    Adjusted diluted earnings per common share   $ 0.74     $ 0.20     $ 0.78     $ 1.47     $ 2.53  
    Adjusted return on average assets     0.95 %     0.35 %     0.98 %     0.67 %     1.07 %
    Adjusted return on average shareholders’ equity     9.23 %     3.46 %     10.03 %     6.61 %     10.99 %
    Adjusted return on average tangible common equity     12.67 %     3.65 %     14.24 %     8.61 %     15.80 %
     
                         
                         
    Adjusted Pre-Tax, Pre-Provision Earnings Reconciliation
                         
        For the Three Months Ended   For the Nine Months Ended
        September 30,   June 30,   September 30,   September 30,   September 30,
    (dollars in thousands)     2024       2024       2023       2024       2023  
    Adjusted earnings pre tax – non-GAAP   $ 22,523     $ 8,414     $ 27,896     $ 49,177     $ 86,223  
    Provision for credit losses     5,000       16,800       5,168       35,800       14,182  
    Adjusted pre-tax, pre-provision earnings – non-GAAP   $ 27,523     $ 25,214     $ 33,064     $ 84,977     $ 100,405  
    Adjusted pre-tax, pre-provision return on average assets     1.42 %     1.30 %     1.66 %     1.46 %     1.70 %
    MIDLAND STATES BANCORP, INC.
    RECONCILIATIONS OF NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES (unaudited) (continued)
                         
    Efficiency Ratio Reconciliation
                         
        For the Three Months Ended   For the Nine Months Ended
        September 30,   June 30,   September 30,   September 30,   September 30,
    (dollars in thousands)     2024       2024       2023       2024       2023  
    Noninterest expense – GAAP   $ 46,733     $ 47,479     $ 42,038     $ 139,079     $ 129,414  
                         
    Net interest income – GAAP   $ 54,950     $ 55,052     $ 58,596     $ 165,922     $ 177,940  
    Effect of tax-exempt income     205       170       205       589       644  
    Adjusted net interest income     55,155       55,222       58,801       166,511       178,584  
                         
    Noninterest income – GAAP     19,339       17,656       11,545       58,182       46,077  
    Loss on sales of investment securities, net     44       152       4,961       196       6,478  
    (Gain) on repurchase of subordinated debt     (77 )     (167 )     —       (244 )     (676 )
    Adjusted noninterest income     19,306       17,641       16,506       58,134       51,879  
                         
    Adjusted total revenue   $ 74,461     $ 72,863     $ 75,307     $ 224,645     $ 230,463  
                         
    Efficiency ratio     62.76 %     65.16 %     55.82 %     61.91 %     56.15 %
                         
    Return on Average Tangible Common Equity (ROATCE)
                         
        For the Three Months Ended   For the Nine Months Ended
        September 30,   June 30,   September 30,   September 30,   September 30,
    (dollars in thousands)     2024       2024       2023       2024       2023  
    Net income available to common shareholders   $ 16,247     $ 4,522     $ 9,173     $ 32,426     $ 48,064  
                         
    Average total shareholders’ equity—GAAP   $ 795,322     $ 783,846     $ 771,625     $ 789,712     $ 771,883  
    Adjustments:                    
    Preferred Stock     (110,548 )     (110,548 )     (110,548 )     (110,548 )     (110,548 )
    Goodwill     (161,904 )     (161,904 )     (161,904 )     (161,904 )     (161,904 )
    Other intangible assets, net     (13,506 )     (14,483 )     (17,782 )     (14,501 )     (18,959 )
    Average tangible common equity   $ 509,364     $ 496,911     $ 481,391     $ 502,759     $ 480,472  
    ROATCE     12.69 %     3.66 %     7.56 %     8.62 %     13.37 %
    MIDLAND STATES BANCORP, INC.
    RECONCILIATIONS OF NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES (unaudited) (continued)
                         
    Tangible Common Equity to Tangible Assets Ratio and Tangible Book Value Per Share
                         
        As of
    (dollars in thousands, except per share data)    September 30,
    2024
     
       June 30,
    2024
     
       March 31,
    2024
     
       December 31,
    2023
     
       September 30,
    2023
     
    Shareholders’ Equity to Tangible Common Equity                
    Total shareholders’ equity—GAAP   $ 818,259     $ 785,772     $ 791,006     $ 791,853     $ 757,610  
    Adjustments:                    
    Preferred Stock     (110,548 )     (110,548 )     (110,548 )     (110,548 )     (110,548 )
    Goodwill     (161,904 )     (161,904 )     (161,904 )     (161,904 )     (161,904 )
    Other intangible assets, net     (13,052 )     (14,003 )     (15,019 )     (16,108 )     (17,238 )
    Tangible common equity     532,755       499,317       503,535       503,293       467,920  
                         
    Less: Accumulated other comprehensive loss (AOCI)     (60,640 )     (82,581 )     (81,419 )     (76,753 )     (101,181 )
    Tangible common equity excluding AOCI   $ 593,395     $ 581,898     $ 584,954     $ 580,046     $ 569,101  
                         
    Total Assets to Tangible Assets:                    
    Total assets—GAAP   $ 7,751,483     $ 7,757,274     $ 7,831,809     $ 7,866,868     $ 7,969,285  
    Adjustments:                    
    Goodwill     (161,904 )     (161,904 )     (161,904 )     (161,904 )     (161,904 )
    Other intangible assets, net     (13,052 )     (14,003 )     (15,019 )     (16,108 )     (17,238 )
    Tangible assets   $ 7,576,527     $ 7,581,367     $ 7,654,886     $ 7,688,856     $ 7,790,143  
                         
    Common Shares Outstanding     21,393,905       21,377,215       21,485,231       21,551,402       21,594,546  
                         
    Tangible Common Equity to Tangible Assets     7.03 %     6.59 %     6.58 %     6.55 %     6.01 %
    Tangible Book Value Per Share   $ 24.90     $ 23.36     $ 23.44     $ 23.35     $ 21.67  
    Tangible Book Value Per Share, excluding AOCI   $ 27.74     $ 27.22     $ 27.23     $ 26.91     $ 26.35  

    The MIL Network –

    January 25, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: Seacoast Reports Third Quarter 2024 Results

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Strong Growth in Loans and Deposits

    Annualized 20% Increase in Tangible Book Value Per Share

    Well-Positioned Balance Sheet with Strong Capital and Liquidity

    STUART, Fla., Oct. 24, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida (“Seacoast” or the “Company”) (NASDAQ: SBCF) today reported net income in the third quarter of 2024 of $30.7 million, or $0.36 per diluted share, compared to $30.2 million, or $0.36 per diluted share in the second quarter of 2024 and $31.4 million, or $0.37 per diluted share in the third quarter of 2023.

    Pre-tax pre-provision earnings1 were $46.1 million in the third quarter of 2024, an increase of 3% compared to the second quarter of 2024 and an increase of 6% compared to the third quarter of 2023. Adjusted pre-tax pre-provision earnings1 were $46.4 million in the third quarter of 2024, an increase of 4% compared to the second quarter of 2024 and a decrease of 2% compared to the third quarter of 2023.

    For the third quarter of 2024, return on average tangible assets was 0.99% and return on average tangible shareholders’ equity was 10.31%, compared to 1.00% and 10.75%, respectively, in the prior quarter, and 1.04% and 11.90%, respectively, in the prior year quarter.

    Charles M. Shaffer, Chairman and CEO of Seacoast, stated, “I would like to thank all of the Seacoast associates for their unwavering dedication during the challenging impact of back-to-back significant hurricanes. Your commitment to our customers and the well-being of our communities is commendable. I am very proud to serve alongside such an amazing and dedicated group of bankers. Furthermore, our hearts and sympathy go out to all those in our communities who lost loved ones and experienced catastrophic outcomes as a result of the storms.”

    Shaffer added, “Turning to third quarter results, this marks the turn in organic growth we had anticipated, with nearly 7% annualized loan growth and 7% annualized customer deposit growth, clearly showcasing the results of our previous investments in banking teams across the state. Additionally, this quarter demonstrated continued growth in net interest income, noninterest income and, when removing accretion on acquired loans, expansion in the net interest margin. Our competitive transformation is taking shape as we build Seacoast into Florida’s leading regional bank. We expect to continue to see positive results from recent talent acquisitions, which will drive further organic growth in the coming periods.”

    Shaffer concluded, “We remain committed to a disciplined approach to credit, and our balance sheet is one of the strongest in the industry, with a Tier 1 capital ratio of 14.8%2 as of September 30, 2024. The ratio of tangible common equity to tangible assets has increased to a strong 9.64%. Our liquidity position is also robust, with a loan-to-deposit ratio of 83%, providing us with balance sheet flexibility as we continue to work towards stronger earnings in the coming periods.”

    Update on Hurricane Recovery

    In late September and early October 2024, communities across our corporate footprint were impacted by Hurricanes Helene and Milton. We maintained uninterrupted digital and telephone access for our customers and, having experienced minimal impacts to our branch properties, we fully reopened to serve our communities shortly after each storm passed. Recovery efforts in many areas continue and the full impacts on people and businesses in the most hard-hit regions are not fully known. We do not expect a significant impact from Hurricane Helene, but an additional provision for credit losses may be warranted in the fourth quarter of 2024 for Hurricane Milton, in a range between approximately $5 million and $10 million.

    Financial Results

    Income Statement

    • Net income in the third quarter of 2024 was $30.7 million, or $0.36 per diluted share, compared to $30.2 million, or $0.36 per diluted share in the prior quarter and $31.4 million, or $0.37 per diluted share in the prior year quarter. For the nine months ended September 30, 2024, net income was $86.9 million, or $1.02 per diluted share, compared to $74.5 million, or $0.89 per diluted share, for the nine months ended September 30, 2023. Adjusted net income1 for the third quarter of 2024 was $30.5 million, or $0.36 per diluted share, compared to $30.3 million, or $0.36 per diluted share, for the prior quarter, and $34.2 million, or $0.40 per diluted share, for the prior year quarter. For the nine months ended September 30, 2024, adjusted net income1 was $91.9 million, or $1.08 per diluted share, compared to $101.9 million, or $1.21 per diluted share, for the nine months ended September 30, 2023.
    • Net revenues were $130.3 million in the third quarter of 2024, an increase of $3.7 million, or 3%, compared to the prior quarter, and a decrease of $6.8 million, or 5%, compared to the prior year quarter. For the nine months ended September 30, 2024, net revenues were $382.5 million, a decrease of $56.7 million, or 13%, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2023. Adjusted net revenues1 were $130.5 million in the third quarter of 2024, an increase of $3.6 million, or 3%, compared to the prior quarter, and a decrease of $7.2 million, or 5%, compared to the prior year quarter. For the nine months ended September 30, 2024, adjusted net revenues1 were $382.9 million, a decrease of $55.2 million, or 13%, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2023.
    • Pre-tax pre-provision earnings1 were $46.1 million in the third quarter of 2024, an increase of $1.5 million, or 3%, compared to the second quarter of 2024 and an increase of $2.7 million, or 6%, compared to the third quarter of 2023. For the nine months ended September 30, 2024, pre-tax pre-provision earnings1 were $126.3 million, a decrease of $5.5 million, or 4%, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2023. Adjusted pre-tax pre-provision earnings1 were $46.4 million in the third quarter of 2024, an increase of $1.9 million, or 4%, compared to the second quarter of 2024 and a decrease of $1.0 million, or 2%, compared to the third quarter of 2023. For the nine months ended September 30, 2024, adjusted pre-tax pre-provision earnings1 were $133.4 million, a decrease of $35.5 million, or 21%, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2023.
    • Net interest income totaled $106.7 million in the third quarter of 2024, an increase of $2.2 million, or 2%, compared to the prior quarter, and a decrease of $12.6 million, or 11%, compared to the prior year quarter. For the nine months ended September 30, 2024, net interest income was $316.2 million, a decrease of $61.3 million, or 16%, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2023. In the loan portfolio, higher interest income from new loan production was partially offset by lower accretion of purchase discount on acquired loans. Included in loan interest income was accretion on acquired loans of $9.2 million in the third quarter of 2024, $10.2 million in the second quarter of 2024, and $14.8 million in the third quarter of 2023. For the nine months ended September 30, 2024, accretion on acquired loans totaled $30.0 million, compared to $45.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2023. Recent purchases in the securities portfolio contributed to higher securities yields. Higher interest expense on deposits reflects the impact of higher rates, with cuts to the federal funds rate late in the quarter not yet fully impacting the third quarter 2024 results.
    • Net interest margin decreased one basis point to 3.17% in the third quarter of 2024 compared to 3.18% in the second quarter of 2024. Excluding the effects of accretion on acquired loans, net interest margin increased three basis points to 2.90% in the third quarter of 2024 compared to 2.87% in the second quarter of 2024. Loan yields were 5.94%, an increase of one basis point from the prior quarter. Securities yields increased six basis points to 3.75%, compared to 3.69% in the prior quarter. The cost of deposits increased three basis points from 2.31% in the prior quarter, to 2.34% in the third quarter of 2024. We expect the cost of deposits to decline in the fourth quarter of 2024.
    • Noninterest income totaled $23.7 million in the third quarter of 2024, an increase of $1.5 million, or 7%, compared to the prior quarter, and an increase of $5.9 million, or 33%, compared to the prior year quarter. For the nine months ended September 30, 2024, noninterest income totaled $66.4 million, an increase of $4.5 million, or 7%, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2023. Results in the third quarter of 2024 included:
      • Service charges on deposits totaled $5.4 million, an increase of $0.1 million, or 1%, from the prior quarter and an increase of $0.8 million, or 16%, from the prior year quarter. Our investments in talent and significant market expansion across the state have resulted in continued growth in treasury management services to commercial customers.
      • Wealth management income totaled $3.8 million, an increase of $0.1 million, or 2%, from the prior quarter and an increase of $0.7 million, or 22%, from the prior year quarter. The wealth management division continues to grow and add new relationships, with assets under management increasing 26% year over year to $2.0 billion at September 30, 2024.
      • Insurance agency income totaled $1.4 million, an increase of 3% from the prior quarter and an increase of 18% from the prior year quarter, reflecting continued growth and expansion of services.
      • SBA gains totaled $0.4 million, a decrease of $0.3 million, or 44%, from the prior quarter and a decrease of $0.2 million, or 36%, from the prior year quarter, due to lower saleable originations.
      • Other income totaled $7.5 million, an increase of $1.5 million, or 26%, from the prior quarter and an increase of $3.2 million, or 74% from the prior year quarter. Increases in the third quarter of 2024 include gains on SBIC investments and higher swap-related fees.
    • The provision for credit losses was $6.3 million in the third quarter of 2024, compared to $4.9 million in the second quarter of 2024 and $2.7 million in the third quarter of 2023.
    • Noninterest expense was $84.8 million in the third quarter of 2024, an increase of $2.3 million, or 3%, compared to the prior quarter, and a decrease of $9.1 million, or 10%, compared to the prior year quarter. Noninterest expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2024, totaled $257.7 million, a decrease of $51.5 million, or 17%, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2023. With significant cost-saving initiatives now complete, Seacoast has prudently managed expenses while strategically investing to support continued growth. Results in the third quarter of 2024 included:
      • Salaries and wages totaled $40.7 million, an increase of $1.8 million, or 5%, compared to the prior quarter and a decrease $5.7 million, or 12%, from the prior year quarter. The third quarter of 2024 reflects continued additions to the banking team as the Company focuses on organic growth.
      • Outsourced data processing costs totaled $8.0 million, a decrease of $0.2 million, or 3%, compared to the prior quarter and a decrease of $0.7 million, or 8%, from the prior year quarter, reflecting the benefit of lower negotiated rates with key service providers.
      • Marketing expenses totaled $2.7 million, a decrease of $0.5 million, or 16%, compared to the prior quarter and an increase of $0.9 million, or 45%, from the prior year quarter, primarily associated with the timing of various campaigns. We will continue to invest in marketing and branding supporting customer growth.
      • Legal and professional fees totaled $2.7 million, an increase of $0.7 million, or 37%, compared to the prior quarter and an increase of $29 thousand, or 1%, from the prior year quarter. Professional services engaged in connection with contract negotiations contributed to the increase in the third quarter of 2024.
    • Seacoast recorded $8.6 million of income tax expense in the third quarter of 2024, compared to $8.9 million in the second quarter of 2024, and $9.1 million in the third quarter of 2023. Tax benefits related to stock-based compensation totaled $0.1 million in the third quarter of 2024, compared to tax expense of $0.2 million in the second quarter of 2024 and a nominal tax benefit in the third quarter of 2023.
    • The efficiency ratio was 59.84% in the third quarter of 2024, compared to 60.21% in the second quarter of 2024 and 62.60% in the prior year quarter. The adjusted efficiency ratio1 was 59.84% in the third quarter of 2024, compared to 60.21% in the second quarter of 2024 and 60.19% in the prior year quarter. The Company continues to remain keenly focused on disciplined expense control, while making investments for growth.

    Balance Sheet

    • At September 30, 2024, the Company had total assets of $15.2 billion and total shareholders’ equity of $2.2 billion. Book value per share was $25.68 as of September 30, 2024, compared to $24.98 as of June 30, 2024, and $24.06 as of September 30, 2023. Tangible book value per share increased 20% annualized from the prior quarter to $16.20 as of September 30, 2024, compared to $15.41 as of June 30, 2024, and $14.26 as of September 30, 2023.
    • Debt securities totaled $2.8 billion as of September 30, 2024, an increase of $180.8 million compared to June 30, 2024. Debt securities include approximately $2.2 billion in securities classified as available for sale and recorded at fair value.
      • During the third quarter of 2024, net unrealized losses associated with available for sale securities declined by $59.6 million due to changes in the interest rate environment. This contributed $0.53 to the increase in tangible book value per share during the quarter. The unrealized loss on available for sale securities is fully reflected in the value presented on the balance sheet.
      • The portfolio also includes $646.1 million in securities classified as held to maturity with a fair value of $538.5 million. Held-to-maturity securities consist solely of mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations guaranteed by U.S. government agencies, each of which is expected to recover any price depreciation over its holding period as the debt securities move to maturity. The Company has significant liquidity and available borrowing capacity and has the intent and ability to hold these investments to maturity.
      • In October, we took advantage of favorable market conditions and repositioned a portion of the available for sale securities portfolio. We sold securities with an average book yield of 2.8%, resulting in a pre-tax loss of approximately $8.0 million impacting fourth quarter results. The proceeds, approximately $113 million, were reinvested in agency mortgage-backed securities with an average book yield of 5.4%, for an estimated earnback of less than three years.
    • Loans increased $166.8 million, or 6.6% annualized, totaling $10.2 billion as of September 30, 2024. Loan originations increased 22% to $657.9 million in the third quarter of 2024, compared to $538.0 million in the second quarter of 2024. The Company continues to exercise a disciplined approach to lending and is benefiting from the investments made in recent years to attract talent from large regional banks across its markets. This talent is onboarding significant new relationships, resulting in increased loan production.
    • Loan pipelines (loans in underwriting and approval or approved and not yet closed) totaled $831.1 million as of September 30, 2024, compared to $834.4 million at June 30, 2024 and $353.0 million at September 30, 2023.
      • Commercial pipelines were $744.5 million as of September 30, 2024, compared to $743.8 million at June 30, 2024, and $259.4 million at September 30, 2023.
      • SBA pipelines were $28.9 million as of September 30, 2024, compared to $29.3 million at June 30, 2024, and $41.4 million at September 30, 2023.
      • Residential saleable pipelines were $11.2 million as of September 30, 2024, compared to $12.1 million at June 30, 2024, and $6.8 million at September 30, 2023. Retained residential pipelines were $21.9 million as of September 30, 2024, compared to $24.7 million at June 30, 2024, and $20.9 million at September 30, 2023.
      • Consumer pipelines were $24.4 million as of September 30, 2024, compared to $24.5 million at both June 30, 2024 and September 30, 2023.
    • Total deposits were $12.2 billion as of September 30, 2024, an increase of $127.5 million, or 4.2% annualized, when compared to June 30, 2024. Excluding brokered balances, total deposits increased $195.9 million, or 6.6% annualized, in the third quarter of 2024.
      • Commercial deposits increased $133.0 million, or 2%, compared to the prior quarter. Of note, commercial noninterest bearing deposits increased $67.2 million, or 3%, from the prior quarter, the result of onboarding new clients.
      • Total noninterest bearing deposits increased $45.5 million, or 5.3% annualized, from the prior quarter.
      • At September 30, 2024, customer transaction account balances represented 49% of total deposits.
      • The Company benefits from a granular deposit franchise, with the top ten depositors representing approximately 3% of total deposits.
      • Average deposits per banking center were $159 million at September 30, 2024, compared to $157 million at June 30, 2024.
      • Uninsured deposits represented only 36% of overall deposit accounts as of September 30, 2024. This includes public funds under the Florida Qualified Public Depository program, which provides loss protection to depositors beyond FDIC insurance limits. Excluding such balances, the uninsured and uncollateralized deposits were 31% of total deposits. The Company has liquidity sources including cash and lines of credit with the Federal Reserve and Federal Home Loan Bank that represent 145% of uninsured deposits, and 167% of uninsured and uncollateralized deposits.
      • Consumer deposits represent 43% of overall deposit funding with an average consumer customer balance of $26 thousand. Commercial deposits represent 57% of overall deposit funding with an average business customer balance of $117 thousand.
    • Federal Home Loan Bank advances totaled $245.0 million at September 30, 2024 with a weighted average interest rate of 4.19%.

    Asset Quality

    • Nonperforming loans were $80.9 million at September 30, 2024, compared to $59.9 million at June 30, 2024, and $41.5 million at September 30, 2023. New nonperforming loans in the third quarter of 2024 have collateral values well in excess of balances outstanding, and therefore, no loss is expected. Nonperforming loans to total loans outstanding were 0.79% at September 30, 2024, 0.60% at June 30, 2024, and 0.41% at September 30, 2023.
    • Accruing past due loans were $50.7 million, or 0.50% of total loans, at September 30, 2024, compared to $39.6 million, or 0.39% of total loans, at June 30, 2024, and $35.5 million, or 0.33% of total loans, at September 30, 2023. A limited number of larger-balance residential mortgage loans, which returned to current status in October, comprise the majority of the increase from the prior quarter.
    • Nonperforming assets to total assets were 0.58% at September 30, 2024, compared to 0.45% at June 30, 2024, and 0.33% at September 30, 2023.
    • The ratio of allowance for credit losses to total loans was 1.38% at September 30, 2024, 1.41% at June 30, 2024, and 1.49% at September 30, 2023.
    • Net charge-offs were $7.4 million in the third quarter of 2024, compared to $9.9 million in the second quarter of 2024 and $12.7 million in the third quarter of 2023. Charge-offs during the quarter primarily reflect specifically identified reserves previously established in the allowance for credit losses.
    • Portfolio diversification, in terms of asset mix, industry, and loan type, has been a critical element of the Company’s lending strategy. Exposure across industries and collateral types is broadly distributed. Seacoast’s average loan size is $360 thousand, and the average commercial loan size is $789 thousand, reflecting an ability to maintain granularity within the overall loan portfolio.
    • Construction and land development and commercial real estate loans remain well below regulatory guidance at 36% and 241% of total bank-level risk-based capital2, respectively, compared to 36% and 235%, respectively, at June 30, 2024. On a consolidated basis, construction and land development and commercial real estate loans represent 34% and 227%, respectively, of total consolidated risk-based capital2.

    Capital and Liquidity

    • The Company continues to operate with a fortress balance sheet with a Tier 1 capital ratio at September 30, 2024 of 14.8%2 compared to 14.8% at June 30, 2024, and 14.0% at September 30, 2023. The Total capital ratio was 16.2%2, the Common Equity Tier 1 capital ratio was 14.1%2, and the Tier 1 leverage ratio was 11.2%2 at September 30, 2024. The Company is considered “well capitalized” based on applicable U.S. regulatory capital ratio requirements.
    • Cash and cash equivalents at September 30, 2024 totaled $637.1 million.
    • The Company’s loan to deposit ratio was 83.4% at September 30, 2024, which should provide liquidity and flexibility moving forward.
    • Tangible common equity to tangible assets was 9.64% at September 30, 2024, compared to 9.30% at June 30, 2024, and 8.68% at September 30, 2023. If all held-to-maturity securities were adjusted to fair value, the tangible common equity ratio would have been 9.11% at September 30, 2024.
    • At September 30, 2024, in addition to $637.1 million in cash, the Company had $5.6 billion in available borrowing capacity, including $4.1 billion in available collateralized lines of credit, $1.2 billion of unpledged debt securities available as collateral for potential additional borrowings, and available unsecured lines of credit of $0.3 billion. These liquidity sources as of September 30, 2024, represented 167% of uninsured and uncollateralized deposits.

    1 Non-GAAP measure, see “Explanation of Certain Unaudited Non-GAAP Financial Measures” for more information and for a reconciliation to GAAP.
    2 Estimated.

    FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS              
    (Amounts in thousands except per share data) (Unaudited)
      Quarterly Trends
                       
      3Q’24   2Q’24   1Q’24   4Q’23   3Q’23
    Selected balance sheet data:                  
    Gross loans $ 10,205,281     $ 10,038,508     $ 9,978,052     $ 10,062,940     $ 10,011,186  
    Total deposits   12,243,585       12,116,118       12,015,840       11,776,935       12,107,834  
    Total assets   15,168,371       14,952,613       14,830,015       14,580,249       14,823,007  
                       
    Performance measures:                  
    Net income $ 30,651     $ 30,244     $ 26,006     $ 29,543     $ 31,414  
    Net interest margin   3.17 %     3.18 %     3.24 %     3.36 %     3.57 %
    Pre-tax pre-provision earnings1 $ 46,086     $ 44,555     $ 35,674     $ 42,006     $ 43,383  
    Average diluted shares outstanding   85,069       84,816       85,270       85,336       85,666  
    Diluted earnings per share (EPS)   0.36       0.36       0.31       0.35       0.37  
    Return on (annualized):                  
    Average assets (ROA)   0.81 %     0.82 %     0.71 %     0.80 %     0.84 %
    Average tangible assets (ROTA)2   0.99       1.00       0.89       0.99       1.04  
    Average tangible common equity (ROTCE)2   10.31       10.75       9.55       11.22       11.90  
    Tangible common equity to tangible assets2   9.64       9.30       9.25       9.31       8.68  
    Tangible book value per share2 $ 16.20     $ 15.41     $ 15.26     $ 15.08     $ 14.26  
    Efficiency ratio   59.84 %     60.21 %     66.78 %     60.32 %     62.60 %
                       
    Adjusted operating measures1:                  
    Adjusted net income4 $ 30,511     $ 30,277     $ 31,132     $ 31,363     $ 34,170  
    Adjusted pre-tax pre-provision earnings4   46,390       44,490       42,513       45,016       47,349  
    Adjusted diluted EPS4   0.36       0.36       0.37       0.37       0.40  
    Adjusted ROTA2   0.98 %     1.00 %     1.04 %     1.04 %     1.12 %
    Adjusted ROTCE2   10.27       10.76       11.15       11.80       12.79  
    Adjusted efficiency ratio   59.84       60.21       61.13       60.32       60.19  
    Net adjusted noninterest expense as a
    percent of average tangible assets2
      2.19 %     2.19 %     2.23 %     2.25 %     2.34 %
                       
    Other data:                  
    Market capitalization3 $ 2,277,003     $ 2,016,472     $ 2,156,529     $ 2,415,158     $ 1,869,891  
    Full-time equivalent employees   1,493       1,449       1,445       1,541       1,570  
    Number of ATMs   96       95       95       96       97  
    Full-service banking offices   77       77       77       77       77  
    1Non-GAAP measure, see “Explanation of Certain Unaudited Non-GAAP Financial Measures” for more information and a reconciliation to GAAP.
    2The Company defines tangible assets as total assets less intangible assets, and tangible common equity as total shareholders’ equity less intangible assets.
    3Common shares outstanding multiplied by closing bid price on last day of each period.
    4As of 1Q’24, amortization of intangibles is excluded from adjustments to noninterest expense; prior periods have been updated to reflect the change.

    OTHER INFORMATION

    Conference Call Information

    Seacoast will host a conference call October 25, 2024, at 10:00 a.m. (Eastern Time) to discuss the third quarter of 2024 earnings results and business trends. Investors may call in (toll-free) by dialing (800) 715-9871 (Conference ID: 6787376). Charts will be used during the conference call and may be accessed at Seacoast’s website at www.SeacoastBanking.com by selecting “Presentations” under the heading “News/Events.” Additionally, a recording of the call will be made available to individuals shortly after the conference call and can be accessed via a link at www.SeacoastBanking.com under the heading “Corporate Information.” The recording will be available for one year.

    About Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida (NASDAQ: SBCF)

    Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida (NASDAQ: SBCF) is one of the largest community banks headquartered in Florida with approximately $15.2 billion in assets and $12.2 billion in deposits as of September 30, 2024. Seacoast provides integrated financial services including commercial and consumer banking, wealth management, and mortgage services to customers at 77 full-service branches across Florida, and through advanced mobile and online banking solutions. Seacoast National Bank is the wholly-owned subsidiary bank of Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida. For more information about Seacoast, visit www.SeacoastBanking.com. 

    Cautionary Notice Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

    This press release contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning, and protections, of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, including, without limitation, statements about future financial and operating results, cost savings, enhanced revenues, economic and seasonal conditions in the Company’s markets, and improvements to reported earnings that may be realized from cost controls, tax law changes, new initiatives and for integration of banks that the Company has acquired, or expects to acquire, as well as statements with respect to Seacoast’s objectives, strategic plans, expectations and intentions and other statements that are not historical facts. Actual results may differ from those set forth in the forward-looking statements.

    Forward-looking statements include statements with respect to the Company’s beliefs, plans, objectives, goals, expectations, anticipations, assumptions, estimates and intentions about future performance and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, which may be beyond the Company’s control, and which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida (“Seacoast” or the “Company”) or its wholly-owned banking subsidiary, Seacoast National Bank (“Seacoast Bank”), to be materially different from results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. You should not expect the Company to update any forward-looking statements.

    All statements other than statements of historical fact could be forward-looking statements. You can identify these forward-looking statements through the use of words such as “may”, “will”, “anticipate”, “assume”, “should”, “support”, “indicate”, “would”, “believe”, “contemplate”, “expect”, “estimate”, “continue”, “further”, “plan”, “point to”, “project”, “could”, “intend”, “target” or other similar words and expressions of the future. These forward-looking statements may not be realized due to a variety of factors, including, without limitation: the impact of current and future economic and market conditions generally (including seasonality) and in the financial services industry, nationally and within Seacoast’s primary market areas, including the effects of inflationary pressures, changes in interest rates, slowdowns in economic growth, and the potential for high unemployment rates, as well as the financial stress on borrowers and changes to customer and client behavior and credit risk as a result of the foregoing; potential impacts of adverse developments in the banking industry, including those highlighted by high-profile bank failures, and including impacts on customer confidence, deposit outflows, liquidity and the regulatory response thereto (including increases in the cost of our deposit insurance assessments), the Company’s ability to effectively manage its liquidity risk and any growth plans, and the availability of capital and funding; governmental monetary and fiscal policies, including interest rate policies of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve, as well as legislative, tax and regulatory changes including proposed overdraft and late fee caps, including those that impact the money supply and inflation; the risks of changes in interest rates on the level and composition of deposits (as well as the cost of, and competition for, deposits), loan demand, liquidity and the values of loan collateral, securities, and interest rate sensitive assets and liabilities; interest rate risks (including the impacts of interest rates on macroeconomic conditions, customer and client behavior, and on our net interest income), sensitivities and the shape of the yield curve; changes in accounting policies, rules and practices; changes in retail distribution strategies, customer preferences and behavior generally and as a result of economic factors, including heightened inflation; changes in the availability and cost of credit and capital in the financial markets; changes in the prices, values and sales volumes of residential and commercial real estate, especially as they relate to the value of collateral supporting the Company’s loans; the Company’s concentration in commercial real estate loans and in real estate collateral in Florida; Seacoast’s ability to comply with any regulatory requirements and the risk that the regulatory environment may not be conducive to or may prohibit or delay the consummation of future mergers and/or business combinations, may increase the length of time and amount of resources required to consummate such transactions, and may reduce the anticipated benefit; inaccuracies or other failures from the use of models, including the failure of assumptions and estimates, as well as differences in, and changes to, economic, market and credit conditions; the impact on the valuation of Seacoast’s investments due to market volatility or counterparty payment risk, as well as the effect of a decline in stock market prices on our fee income from our wealth management business; statutory and regulatory dividend restrictions; increases in regulatory capital requirements for banking organizations generally; the risks of mergers, acquisitions and divestitures, including Seacoast’s ability to continue to identify acquisition targets, successfully acquire and integrate desirable financial institutions and realize expected revenues and revenue synergies; changes in technology or products that may be more difficult, costly, or less effective than anticipated; the Company’s ability to identify and address increased cybersecurity risks, including those impacting vendors and other third parties which may be exacerbated by developments in generative artificial intelligence; fraud or misconduct by internal or external parties, which Seacoast may not be able to prevent, detect or mitigate; inability of Seacoast’s risk management framework to manage risks associated with the Company’s business; dependence on key suppliers or vendors to obtain equipment or services for the business on acceptable terms; reduction in or the termination of Seacoast’s ability to use the online- or mobile-based platform that is critical to the Company’s business growth strategy; the effects of war or other conflicts, acts of terrorism, natural disasters, including hurricanes in the Company’s footprint, health emergencies, epidemics or pandemics, or other catastrophic events that may affect general economic conditions and/or increase costs, including, but not limited to, property and casualty and other insurance costs; Seacoast’s ability to maintain adequate internal controls over financial reporting; potential claims, damages, penalties, fines, costs and reputational damage resulting from pending or future litigation, regulatory proceedings and enforcement actions; the risks that deferred tax assets could be reduced if estimates of future taxable income from the Company’s operations and tax planning strategies are less than currently estimated, the results of tax audit findings, challenges to our tax positions, or adverse changes or interpretations of tax laws; the effects of competition from other commercial banks, thrifts, mortgage banking firms, consumer finance companies, credit unions, non-bank financial technology providers, securities brokerage firms, insurance companies, money market and other mutual funds and other financial institutions; the failure of assumptions underlying the establishment of reserves for expected credit losses; risks related to, and the costs associated with, environmental, social and governance matters, including the scope and pace of related rulemaking activity and disclosure requirements; a deterioration of the credit rating for U.S. long-term sovereign debt, actions that the U.S. government may take to avoid exceeding the debt ceiling, and uncertainties surrounding the federal budget and economic policy; the risk that balance sheet, revenue growth, and loan growth expectations may differ from actual results; and other factors and risks described under “Risk Factors” herein and in any of the Company’s subsequent reports filed with the SEC and available on its website at www.sec.gov.

    All written or oral forward-looking statements attributable to us are expressly qualified in their entirety by this cautionary notice, including, without limitation, those risks and uncertainties described in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023 and in other periodic reports that the Company files with the SEC. Such reports are available upon request from the Company, or from the Securities and Exchange Commission, including through the SEC’s Internet website at www.sec.gov.

    FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS         (Unaudited)          
    SEACOAST BANKING CORPORATION OF FLORIDA AND SUBSIDIARIES                    
              Quarterly Trends           Nine Months Ended
    (Amounts in thousands, except ratios and per share data) 3Q’24   2Q’24   1Q’24   4Q’23   3Q’23   3Q’24   3Q’23
    Summary of Earnings                          
    Net income $ 30,651     $ 30,244     $ 26,006     $ 29,543     $ 31,414     $ 86,901     $ 74,490  
    Adjusted net income1,6   30,511       30,277       31,132       31,363       34,170       91,920       101,878  
    Net interest income2   106,975       104,657       105,298       111,035       119,505       316,930       378,009  
    Net interest margin2,3   3.17 %     3.18 %     3.24 %     3.36 %     3.57 %     3.19 %     3.91 %
    Pre-tax pre-provision earnings1   46,086       44,555       35,674       42,006       43,383       126,315       131,807  
    Adjusted pre-tax pre-provision earnings1,6   46,390       44,490       42,513       45,016       47,349       133,393       168,905  
                               
    Performance Ratios                          
    Return on average assets-GAAP basis3   0.81 %     0.82 %     0.71 %     0.80 %     0.84 %     0.78 %     0.68 %
    Return on average tangible assets-GAAP basis3,4   0.99       1.00       0.89       0.99       1.04       0.96       0.88  
    Adjusted return on average tangible assets1,3,4   0.98       1.00       1.04       1.04       1.12       1.01       1.15  
    Pre-tax pre-provision return on average tangible assets1,3,4,6   1.46       1.45       1.22       1.39       1.43       1.38       1.49  
    Adjusted pre-tax pre-provision return on average tangible assets1,3,4   1.47       1.45       1.42       1.48       1.55       1.44       1.85  
    Net adjusted noninterest expense to average tangible assets1,3,4   2.19       2.19       2.23       2.25       2.34       2.20       2.40  
    Return on average shareholders’ equity-GAAP basis3   5.62       5.74       4.94       5.69       6.01       5.44       4.94  
    Return on average tangible common equity-GAAP basis3,4   10.31       10.75       9.55       11.22       11.90       10.21       10.09  
    Adjusted return on average tangible common equity1,3,4   10.27       10.76       11.15       11.80       12.79       10.72       13.14  
    Efficiency ratio5   59.84       60.21       66.78       60.32       62.60       62.24       65.19  
    Adjusted efficiency ratio1   59.84       60.21       61.13       60.32       60.19       60.39       56.47  
    Noninterest income to total revenue (excluding securities gains/losses)   18.05       17.55       16.17       15.14       13.22       17.27       14.16  
    Tangible common equity to tangible assets4   9.64       9.30       9.25       9.31       8.68       9.64       8.68  
    Average loan-to-deposit ratio   83.79       83.11       84.50       83.38       82.63       83.80       82.86  
    End of period loan-to-deposit ratio   83.44       82.90       83.12       85.48       82.71       83.44       82.71  
                               
    Per Share Data                          
    Net income diluted-GAAP basis $ 0.36     $ 0.36     $ 0.31     $ 0.35     $ 0.37     $ 1.02     $ 0.89  
    Net income basic-GAAP basis   0.36       0.36       0.31       0.35       0.37       1.03       0.89  
    Adjusted earnings1,6   0.36       0.36       0.37       0.37       0.40       1.08       1.21  
                               
    Book value per share common   25.68       24.98       24.93       24.84       24.06       25.68       24.06  
    Tangible book value per share   16.20       15.41       15.26       15.08       14.26       16.20       14.26  
    Cash dividends declared   0.18       0.18       0.18       0.18       0.18       0.54       0.53  
    1Non-GAAP measure – see “Explanation of Certain Unaudited Non-GAAP Financial Measures” for more information and a reconciliation to GAAP. 2Calculated on a fully taxable equivalent basis using amortized cost. 3These ratios are stated on an annualized basis and are not necessarily indicative of future periods. 4The Company defines tangible assets as total assets less intangible assets, and tangible common equity as total shareholders’ equity less intangible assets. 5Defined as noninterest expense less amortization of intangibles and gains, losses, and expenses on foreclosed properties divided by net operating revenue (net interest income on a fully taxable equivalent basis plus noninterest income excluding securities gains and losses). 6As of 1Q’24, amortization of intangibles is excluded from adjustments to noninterest expense; prior periods have been updated to reflect the change.
    CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME   (Unaudited)          
    SEACOAST BANKING CORPORATION OF FLORIDA AND SUBSIDIARIES                    
      Quarterly Trends   Nine Months Ended
    (Amounts in thousands, except per share data) 3Q’24   2Q’24   1Q’24   4Q’23   3Q’23   3Q’24   3Q’23
                               
    Interest on securities:                          
    Taxable $ 25,963   $ 24,155     $ 22,393     $ 21,383     $ 21,401     $ 72,511   $ 61,543  
    Nontaxable   34     33       34       55       97       101     299  
    Interest and fees on loans   150,980     147,292       147,095       147,801       149,871       445,367     433,304  
    Interest on interest bearing deposits and other investments   7,138     8,328       6,184       7,616       8,477       21,650     16,974  
    Total Interest Income   184,115     179,808       175,706       176,855       179,846       539,629     512,120  
                               
    Interest on deposits   51,963     51,319       47,534       44,923       38,396       150,816     81,612  
    Interest on time certificates   19,002     17,928       17,121       15,764       16,461       54,051     36,490  
    Interest on borrowed money   6,485     6,137       5,973       5,349       5,683       18,595     16,597  
    Total Interest Expense   77,450     75,384       70,628       66,036       60,540       223,462     134,699  
                               
    Net Interest Income   106,665     104,424       105,078       110,819       119,306       316,167     377,421  
    Provision for credit losses   6,273     4,918       1,368       3,990       2,694       12,559     33,528  
    Net Interest Income After Provision for Credit Losses   100,392     99,506       103,710       106,829       116,612       303,608     343,893  
                               
    Noninterest income:                          
    Service charges on deposit accounts   5,412     5,342       4,960       4,828       4,648       15,714     13,450  
    Interchange income   1,911     1,940       1,888       2,433       1,684       5,739     11,444  
    Wealth management income   3,843     3,766       3,540       3,261       3,138       11,149     9,519  
    Mortgage banking fees   485     582       381       378       410       1,448     1,412  
    Insurance agency income   1,399     1,355       1,291       1,066       1,183       4,045     3,444  
    SBA gains   391     694       739       921       613       1,824     1,184  
    BOLI income   2,578     2,596       2,264       2,220       2,197       7,438     6,181  
    Other   7,473     5,953       5,205       4,668       4,307       18,631     15,636  
        23,492     22,228       20,268       19,775       18,180       65,988     62,270  
    Securities gains (losses), net   187     (44 )     229       (2,437 )     (387 )     372     (456 )
    Total Noninterest Income   23,679     22,184       20,497       17,338       17,793       66,360     61,814  
                               
    Noninterest expense:                          
    Salaries and wages   40,697     38,937       40,304       38,435       46,431       119,938     139,202  
    Employee benefits   6,955     6,861       7,889       6,678       7,206       21,705     23,240  
    Outsourced data processing costs   8,003     8,210       12,118       8,609       8,714       28,331     43,489  
    Occupancy   7,096     7,180       8,037       7,512       7,758       22,313     24,360  
    Furniture and equipment   2,060     1,956       2,011       2,028       2,052       6,027     6,664  
    Marketing   2,729     3,266       2,655       2,995       1,876       8,650     6,161  
    Legal and professional fees   2,708     1,982       2,151       3,294       2,679       6,841     14,220  
    FDIC assessments   1,882     2,131       2,158       2,813       2,258       6,171     5,817  
    Amortization of intangibles   6,002     6,003       6,292       6,888       7,457       18,297     21,838  
    Other real estate owned expense and net loss (gain) on sale   491     (109 )     (26 )     573       274       356     412  
    Provision for credit losses on unfunded commitments   250     251       250       —       —       751     1,239  
    Other   5,945     5,869       6,532       6,542       7,210       18,346     22,613  
    Total Noninterest Expense   84,818     82,537       90,371       86,367       93,915       257,726     309,255  
                               
    Income Before Income Taxes   39,253     39,153       33,836       37,800       40,490       112,242     96,452  
    Provision for income taxes   8,602     8,909       7,830       8,257       9,076       25,341     21,962  
    Net Income $ 30,651   $ 30,244     $ 26,006     $ 29,543     $ 31,414     $ 86,901   $ 74,490  
                               
    Share Data                          
    Net income per share of common stock                          
    Diluted $ 0.36   $ 0.36     $ 0.31     $ 0.35     $ 0.37     $ 1.02   $ 0.89  
    Basic   0.36     0.36       0.31       0.35       0.37       1.03     0.89  
    Cash dividends declared   0.18     0.18       0.18       0.18       0.18       0.54     0.53  
                               
    Average common shares outstanding                          
    Diluted   85,069     84,816       85,270       85,336       85,666       84,915     83,993  
    Basic   84,434     84,341       84,908       84,817       85,142       84,319     83,457  
                               
    CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS       (Unaudited)        
    SEACOAST BANKING CORPORATION OF FLORIDA AND SUBSIDIARIES                
      September 30,   June 30,   March 31,   December 31,   September 30,
    (Amounts in thousands)  2024     2024     2024     2023     2023 
    Assets                  
    Cash and due from banks $ 182,743     $ 168,738     $ 137,850     $ 167,511     $ 182,036  
    Interest bearing deposits with other banks   454,315       580,787       544,874       279,671       513,946  
    Total cash and cash equivalents   637,058       749,525       682,724       447,182       695,982  
                       
    Time deposits with other banks   5,207       7,856       7,856       5,857       4,357  
                       
    Debt Securities:                  
    Securities available for sale (at fair value)   2,160,055       1,967,204       1,949,463       1,836,020       1,841,845  
    Securities held to maturity (at amortized cost)   646,050       658,055       669,896       680,313       691,404  
    Total debt securities   2,806,105       2,625,259       2,619,359       2,516,333       2,533,249  
                       
    Loans held for sale   11,039       5,975       9,475       4,391       2,979  
                       
    Loans   10,205,281       10,038,508       9,978,052       10,062,940       10,011,186  
    Less: Allowance for credit losses   (140,469 )     (141,641 )     (146,669 )     (148,931 )     (149,661 )
    Loans, net of allowance for credit losses   10,064,812       9,896,867       9,831,383       9,914,009       9,861,525  
                       
    Bank premises and equipment, net   108,776       109,945       110,787       113,304       115,749  
    Other real estate owned   6,421       6,877       7,315       7,560       7,216  
    Goodwill   732,417       732,417       732,417       732,417       731,970  
    Other intangible assets, net   77,431       83,445       89,377       95,645       102,397  
    Bank owned life insurance   306,379       303,816       301,229       298,974       296,763  
    Net deferred tax assets   94,820       108,852       111,539       113,232       131,602  
    Other assets   317,906       321,779       326,554       331,345       339,218  
    Total Assets $ 15,168,371     $ 14,952,613     $ 14,830,015     $ 14,580,249     $ 14,823,007  
                       
    Liabilities                  
    Deposits                  
    Noninterest demand $ 3,443,455     $ 3,397,918     $ 3,555,401     $ 3,544,981     $ 3,868,132  
    Interest-bearing demand   2,487,448       2,821,092       2,711,041       2,790,210       2,800,152  
    Savings   524,474       566,052       608,088       651,454       721,558  
    Money market   4,034,371       3,707,761       3,531,029       3,314,288       3,143,897  
    Time deposits   1,753,837       1,623,295       1,610,281       1,476,002       1,574,095  
    Total Deposits   12,243,585       12,116,118       12,015,840       11,776,935       12,107,834  
                       
    Securities sold under agreements to repurchase   210,176       262,103       326,732       374,573       276,450  
    Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings   245,000       180,000       110,000       50,000       110,000  
    Long-term debt, net   106,800       106,634       106,468       106,302       106,136  
    Other liabilities   168,960       157,377       153,225       164,353       174,193  
    Total Liabilities   12,974,521       12,822,232       12,712,265       12,472,163       12,774,613  
                       
    Shareholders’ Equity                  
    Common stock   8,614       8,530       8,494       8,486       8,515  
    Additional paid in capital   1,821,050       1,815,800       1,811,941       1,808,883       1,813,068  
    Retained earnings   508,036       492,805       478,017       467,305       453,117  
    Less: Treasury stock   (18,680 )     (18,744 )     (16,746 )     (16,710 )     (14,035 )
        2,319,020       2,298,391       2,281,706       2,267,964       2,260,665  
    Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net   (125,170 )     (168,010 )     (163,956 )     (159,878 )     (212,271 )
    Total Shareholders’ Equity   2,193,850       2,130,381       2,117,750       2,108,086       2,048,394  
    Total Liabilities & Shareholders’ Equity $ 15,168,371     $ 14,952,613     $ 14,830,015     $ 14,580,249     $ 14,823,007  
                       
    Common shares outstanding   85,441       85,299       84,935       84,861       85,150  
    CONSOLIDATED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA       (Unaudited)    
    SEACOAST BANKING CORPORATION OF FLORIDA AND SUBSIDIARIES                    
                         
    (Amounts in thousands)   3Q’24   2Q’24   1Q’24   4Q’23   3Q’23
    Credit Analysis                    
    Net charge-offs   $ 7,445     $ 9,946     $ 3,630     $ 4,720     $ 12,748  
    Net charge-offs to average loans     0.29 %     0.40 %     0.15 %     0.19 %     0.50 %
                         
    Allowance for credit losses   $ 140,469     $ 141,641     $ 146,669     $ 148,931     $ 149,661  
                         
    Non-acquired loans at end of period   $ 7,178,186     $ 6,834,059     $ 6,613,763     $ 6,571,454     $ 6,343,121  
    Acquired loans at end of period     3,027,095       3,204,449       3,364,289       3,491,486       3,668,065  
    Total Loans   $ 10,205,281     $ 10,038,508     $ 9,978,052     $ 10,062,940     $ 10,011,186  
                         
    Total allowance for credit losses to total loans at end of period     1.38 %     1.41 %     1.47 %     1.48 %     1.49 %
    Purchase discount on acquired loans at end of period     4.48       4.51       4.63       4.75       4.86  
                         
    End of Period                    
    Nonperforming loans   $ 80,857     $ 59,927     $ 77,205     $ 65,104     $ 41,508  
    Other real estate owned     933       1,173       309       221       221  
    Properties previously used in bank operations included in other real estate owned     5,488       5,704       7,006       7,339       6,995  
    Total Nonperforming Assets   $ 87,278     $ 66,804     $ 84,520     $ 72,664     $ 48,724  
                         
    Nonperforming Loans to Loans at End of Period     0.79 %     0.60 %     0.77 %     0.65 %     0.41 %
                         
    Nonperforming Assets to Total Assets at End of Period     0.58       0.45       0.57       0.50       0.33  
                         
        September 30,   June 30,   March 31,   December 31,   September 30,
    Loans    2024     2024     2024     2023     2023 
    Construction and land development   $ 595,753     $ 593,534     $ 623,246     $ 767,622     $ 793,736  
    Commercial real estate – owner occupied     1,676,814       1,656,391       1,656,131       1,670,281       1,675,881  
    Commercial real estate – non-owner occupied     3,573,076       3,423,266       3,368,339       3,319,890       3,285,974  
    Residential real estate     2,564,903       2,555,320       2,521,399       2,445,692       2,418,903  
    Commercial and financial     1,575,228       1,582,290       1,566,198       1,607,888       1,588,152  
    Consumer     219,507       227,707       242,739       251,567       248,540  
    Total Loans   $ 10,205,281     $ 10,038,508     $ 9,978,052     $ 10,062,940     $ 10,011,186  
     
    AVERAGE BALANCES, INTEREST INCOME AND EXPENSES, YIELDS AND RATES 1       (Unaudited)                    
    SEACOAST BANKING CORPORATION OF FLORIDA AND SUBSIDIARIES                                
                                       
                                       
      3Q’24   2Q’24   3Q’23
      Average       Yield/   Average       Yield/   Average       Yield/
    (Amounts in thousands) Balance   Interest   Rate   Balance   Interest   Rate   Balance   Interest   Rate
                                       
    Assets                                  
    Earning assets:                                  
    Securities:                                  
    Taxable $ 2,756,502     $ 25,963   3.75 %   $ 2,629,716     $ 24,155   3.69 %   $ 2,575,002     $ 21,401   3.32 %
    Nontaxable   5,701       42   2.93       5,423       40   2.97       15,280       119   3.11  
    Total Securities   2,762,203       26,005   3.75       2,635,139       24,195   3.69       2,590,282       21,520   3.32  
                                       
    Federal funds sold   433,423       5,906   5.42       510,401       6,967   5.49       547,576       7,415   5.37  
    Interest bearing deposits with other banks and other investments   102,700       1,232   4.77       98,942       1,361   5.53       90,039       1,062   4.68  
                                       
    Total Loans, net2   10,128,822       151,282   5.94       10,005,122       147,518   5.93       10,043,611       150,048   5.93  
                                       
    Total Earning Assets   13,427,148       184,425   5.46       13,249,604       180,041   5.47       13,271,508       180,045   5.38  
                                       
    Allowance for credit losses   (141,974 )             (146,380 )             (158,440 )        
    Cash and due from banks   167,103               168,439               168,931          
    Bank premises and equipment, net   109,699               110,709               116,704          
    Intangible assets   812,761               818,914               839,787          
    Bank owned life insurance   304,703               302,165               295,272          
    Other assets including deferred tax assets   317,406               336,256               372,241          
                                       
    Total Assets $ 14,996,846             $ 14,839,707             $ 14,906,003          
                                       
    Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity                                  
    Interest-bearing liabilities:                                  
    Interest-bearing demand $ 2,489,674     $ 12,905   2.06 %   $ 2,670,569     $ 14,946   2.25 %   $ 2,804,243     $ 15,013   2.12 %
    Savings   546,473       601   0.44       584,490       560   0.39       770,503       465   0.24  
    Money market   3,942,357       38,457   3.88       3,665,858       35,813   3.93       2,972,495       22,918   3.06  
    Time deposits   1,716,720       19,002   4.40       1,631,290       17,928   4.42       1,619,572       16,461   4.03  
    Securities sold under agreements to repurchase   241,083       2,044   3.37       293,603       2,683   3.68       327,711       2,876   3.48  
    Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings   237,935       2,549   4.26       149,234       1,592   4.29       111,087       888   3.17  
    Long-term debt, net   106,706       1,892   7.05       106,532       1,862   7.03       106,036       1,919   7.18  
                                       
    Total Interest-Bearing Liabilities   9,280,948       77,450   3.32       9,101,576       75,384   3.33       8,711,647       60,540   2.76  
                                       
    Noninterest demand   3,393,110               3,485,603               3,987,761          
    Other liabilities   154,344               134,900               133,846          
    Total Liabilities   12,828,402               12,722,079               12,833,254          
                                       
    Shareholders’ equity   2,168,444               2,117,628               2,072,747          
                                       
    Total Liabilities & Equity $ 14,996,846             $ 14,839,707             $ 14,906,003          
                                       
    Cost of deposits         2.34 %           2.31 %           1.79 %
    Interest expense as a % of earning assets         2.29 %           2.29 %           1.81 %
    Net interest income as a % of earning assets     $ 106,975   3.17 %       $ 104,657   3.18 %       $ 119,505   3.57 %
                                       
                                       
    1 On a fully taxable equivalent basis. All yields and rates have been computed using amortized cost.              
    2 Fees on loans have been included in interest on loans. Nonaccrual loans are included in loan balances.              
    AVERAGE BALANCES, INTEREST INCOME AND EXPENSES, YIELDS AND RATES 1       (Unaudited)        
    SEACOAST BANKING CORPORATION OF FLORIDA AND SUBSIDIARIES                    
                           
                           
      Nine Months Ended September 30, 2024   Nine Months Ended September 30, 2023
      Average       Yield/   Average       Yield/
    (Amounts in thousands) Balance   Interest   Rate   Balance   Interest   Rate
                           
    Assets                      
    Earning assets:                      
    Securities:                      
    Taxable $ 2,655,422     $ 72,511   3.65 %   $ 2,649,127     $ 61,543   3.10 %
    Nontaxable   5,677       123   2.89       15,721       370   3.14  
    Total Securities   2,661,099       72,634   3.65       2,664,848       61,913   3.10  
                           
    Federal funds sold   438,089       17,929   5.47       336,022       12,444   4.95  
    Interest bearing deposits with other banks and other investments   102,415       3,721   4.85       90,511       4,530   6.69  
                           
    Total Loans, net2   10,056,466       446,108   5.93       9,840,484       433,821   5.89  
                           
    Total Earning Assets   13,258,069       540,392   5.44       12,931,865       512,708   5.30  
                           
    Allowance for credit losses   (145,579 )             (151,613 )        
    Cash and due from banks   167,424               185,426          
    Bank premises and equipment, net   110,929               116,840          
    Intangible assets   819,046               811,483          
    Bank owned life insurance   302,220               287,756          
    Other assets including deferred tax assets   330,898               402,175          
                           
    Total Assets $ 14,843,007             $ 14,583,932          
                           
    Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity                      
    Interest-bearing liabilities:                      
    Interest-bearing demand $ 2,626,026     $ 43,117   2.19 %   $ 2,642,180     $ 25,780   1.30 %
    Savings   586,285       1,701   0.39       909,184       1,292   0.19  
    Money market   3,673,493       105,998   3.85       2,831,747       54,540   2.58  
    Time deposits   1,646,285       54,051   4.39       1,288,736       36,490   3.79  
    Securities sold under agreements to repurchase   289,181       7,806   3.61       249,242       5,333   2.86  
    Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings   163,468       5,101   4.17       214,415       5,936   3.70  
    Long-term debt, net   106,538       5,688   7.13       103,469       5,328   6.88  
                           
    Total Interest-Bearing Liabilities   9,091,276       223,462   3.28       8,238,973       134,699   2.19  
                           
    Noninterest demand   3,468,790               4,204,389          
    Other liabilities   148,000               126,487          
    Total Liabilities   12,708,066               12,569,849          
                           
    Shareholders’ equity   2,134,941               2,014,083          
                           
    Total Liabilities & Equity $ 14,843,007             $ 14,583,932          
                           
    Cost of deposits         2.28 %           1.33 %
    Interest expense as a % of earning assets         2.25 %           1.39 %
    Net interest income as a % of earning assets     $ 316,930   3.19 %       $ 378,009   3.91 %
                           
                           
    1 On a fully taxable equivalent basis. All yields and rates have been computed using amortized cost.        
    2 Fees on loans have been included in interest on loans. Nonaccrual loans are included in loan balances.        
    CONSOLIDATED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA         (Unaudited)        
    SEACOAST BANKING CORPORATION OF FLORIDA AND SUBSIDIARIES                  
    (Amounts in thousands) September 30,
    2024
      June 30,
    2024
      March 31,
    2024
      December 31,
    2023
      September 30,
    2023
    Customer Relationship Funding                  
    Noninterest demand                  
    Commercial $ 2,731,564   $ 2,664,353   $ 2,808,151   $ 2,752,644   $ 3,089,488
    Retail   509,527     532,623     553,697     561,569     570,727
    Public funds   139,072     142,846     145,747     173,893     134,649
    Other   63,292     58,096     47,806     56,875     73,268
    Total Noninterest Demand   3,443,455     3,397,918     3,555,401     3,544,981     3,868,132
                       
    Interest-bearing demand                  
    Commercial   1,426,920     1,533,725     1,561,905     1,576,491     1,618,755
    Retail   874,043     892,032     930,178     956,900     994,224
    Brokered   —     198,337     —     —     —
    Public funds   186,485     196,998     218,958     256,819     187,173
    Total Interest-Bearing Demand   2,487,448     2,821,092     2,711,041     2,790,210     2,800,152
                       
    Total transaction accounts                  
    Commercial   4,158,484     4,198,078     4,370,056     4,329,135     4,708,243
    Retail   1,383,570     1,424,655     1,483,875     1,518,469     1,564,951
    Brokered   —     198,337     —     —     —
    Public funds   325,557     339,844     364,705     430,712     321,822
    Other   63,292     58,096     47,806     56,875     73,268
    Total Transaction Accounts   5,930,903     6,219,010     6,266,442     6,335,191     6,668,284
                       
    Savings                  
    Commercial   44,151     53,523     52,665     58,562     79,731
    Retail   480,323     512,529     555,423     592,892     641,827
    Total Savings   524,474     566,052     608,088     651,454     721,558
                       
    Money market                  
    Commercial   1,953,851     1,771,927     1,709,636     1,655,820     1,625,455
    Retail   1,887,975     1,733,505     1,621,618     1,469,142     1,362,390
    Public funds   192,545     202,329     199,775     189,326     156,052
    Total Money Market   4,034,371     3,707,761     3,531,029     3,314,288     3,143,897
                       
    Brokered time certificates   256,536     126,668     142,717     122,347     307,963
    Time deposits   1,497,301     1,496,627     1,467,564     1,353,655     1,266,132
        1,753,837     1,623,295     1,610,281     1,476,002     1,574,095
    Total Deposits $ 12,243,585   $ 12,116,118   $ 12,015,840   $ 11,776,935   $ 12,107,834
                       
    Securities sold under agreements to repurchase   210,176     262,103     326,732     374,573     276,450
                       
    Total customer funding 1 $ 12,197,225   $ 12,053,216   $ 12,199,855   $ 12,029,161   $ 12,076,321
                       
    1Total deposits and securities sold under agreements to repurchase, excluding brokered deposits. Securities sold under agreements to repurchase consists of customer sweep accounts.

    Explanation of Certain Unaudited Non-GAAP Financial Measures

    This presentation contains financial information determined by methods other than Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”). Management uses these non-GAAP financial measures in its analysis of the Company’s performance and believes these presentations provide useful supplemental information, and a clearer understanding of the Company’s performance. The Company believes the non-GAAP measures enhance investors’ understanding of the Company’s business and performance and if not provided would be requested by the investor community. These measures are also useful in understanding performance trends and facilitate comparisons with the performance of other financial institutions. The limitations associated with operating measures are the risk that persons might disagree as to the appropriateness of items comprising these measures and that different companies might define or calculate these measures differently. The Company provides reconciliations between GAAP and these non-GAAP measures. These disclosures should not be considered an alternative to GAAP.

    GAAP TO NON-GAAP RECONCILIATION         (Unaudited)              
    SEACOAST BANKING CORPORATION OF FLORIDA AND SUBSIDIARIES                        
              Quarterly Trends           Nine Months Ended
    (Amounts in thousands, except per share data) 3Q’24   2Q’24   1Q’24   4Q’23   3Q’23   3Q’24 3Q’23
    Net Income $ 30,651     $ 30,244     $ 26,006     $ 29,543     $ 31,414     $ 86,901   $ 74,490  
                             
    Total noninterest income   23,679       22,184       20,497       17,338       17,793       66,360     61,814  
    Securities (gains) losses, net   (187 )     44       (229 )     2,437       387       (372 )   456  
    BOLI benefits on death (included in other income)   —       —       —       —       —       —     (2,117 )
    Total Adjustments to Noninterest Income   (187 )     44       (229 )     2,437       387       (372 )   (1,661 )
    Total Adjusted Noninterest Income   23,492       22,228       20,268       19,775       18,180       65,988     60,153  
                             
    Total noninterest expense   84,818       82,537       90,371       86,367       93,915       257,726     309,255  
    Merger-related charges   —       —       —       —       —       —     (33,180 )
    Branch reductions and other expense initiatives   —       —       (7,094 )     —       (3,305 )     (7,094 )   (5,167 )
    Adjustments to Noninterest Expense   —       —       (7,094 )     —       (3,305 )     (7,094 )   (38,347 )
    Adjusted Noninterest Expense2   84,818       82,537       83,277       86,367       90,610       250,632     270,908  
                             
    Income Taxes   8,602       8,909       7,830       8,257       9,076       25,341     21,962  
    Tax effect of adjustments   (47 )     11       1,739       617       936       1,703     9,298  
    Adjusted Income Taxes   8,555       8,920       9,569       8,874       10,012       27,044     31,260  
    Adjusted Net Income2 $ 30,511     $ 30,277     $ 31,132     $ 31,363     $ 34,170     $ 91,920   $ 101,878  
                             
    Earnings per diluted share, as reported $ 0.36     $ 0.36     $ 0.31     $ 0.35     $ 0.37     $ 1.02   $ 0.89  
    Adjusted Earnings per Diluted Share   0.36       0.36       0.37       0.37       0.40       1.08     1.21  
    Average diluted shares outstanding   85,069       84,816       85,270       85,336       85,666       84,915     83,993  
                             
    Adjusted Noninterest Expense $ 84,818     $ 82,537     $ 83,277     $ 86,367     $ 90,610     $ 250,632   $ 270,908  
    Provision for credit losses on unfunded commitments   (250 )     (251 )     (250 )     —       —       (751 )   (1,239 )
    Other real estate owned expense and net gain (loss) on sale   (491 )     109       26       (573 )     (274 )     (356 )   (412 )
    Amortization of intangibles   (6,002 )     (6,003 )     (6,292 )     (6,888 )     (7,457 )     (18,297 )   (21,838 )
    Net Adjusted Noninterest Expense $ 78,075     $ 76,392     $ 76,761     $ 78,906     $ 82,879     $ 231,228   $ 247,419  
    Average tangible assets   14,184,085       14,020,793       13,865,245       13,906,005       14,066,216       14,023,961     13,772,449  
    Net Adjusted Noninterest Expense to Average Tangible Assets   2.19 %     2.19 %     2.23 %     2.25 %     2.34 %     2.20 %   2.40 %
                             
    Net Revenue $ 130,344     $ 126,608     $ 125,575     $ 128,157     $ 137,099     $ 382,527   $ 439,235  
    Total Adjustments to Net Revenue   (187 )     44       (229 )     2,437       387       (372 )   (1,661 )
    Impact of FTE adjustment   310       233       220       216       199       763     588  
    Adjusted Net Revenue on a fully taxable equivalent basis $ 130,467     $ 126,885     $ 125,566     $ 130,810     $ 137,685     $ 382,918   $ 438,162  
    Adjusted Efficiency Ratio   59.84 %     60.21 %     61.13 %     60.32 %     60.19 %     60.39 %   56.47 %
                             
    Net Interest Income $ 106,665     $ 104,424     $ 105,078     $ 110,819     $ 119,306     $ 316,167   $ 377,421  
    Impact of FTE adjustment   310       233       220       216       199       763     588  
    Net Interest Income including FTE adjustment $ 106,975     $ 104,657     $ 105,298     $ 111,035     $ 119,505     $ 316,930   $ 378,009  
    Total noninterest income   23,679       22,184       20,497       17,338       17,793       66,360     61,814  
    Total noninterest expense less provision for credit losses on unfunded commitments   84,568       82,286       90,121       86,367       93,915       256,975     308,016  
    Pre-Tax Pre-Provision Earnings $ 46,086     $ 44,555     $ 35,674     $ 42,006     $ 43,383     $ 126,315   $ 131,807  
    Total Adjustments to Noninterest Income   (187 )     44       (229 )     2,437       387       (372 )   (1,661 )
    Total Adjustments to Noninterest Expense including other real estate owned expense and net (gain) loss on sale   491       (109 )     7,068       573       3,579       7,450     38,759  
    Adjusted Pre-Tax Pre-Provision Earnings2 $ 46,390     $ 44,490     $ 42,513     $ 45,016     $ 47,349     $ 133,393   $ 168,905  
                             
    Average Assets $ 14,996,846     $ 14,839,707     $ 14,690,776     $ 14,738,034     $ 14,906,003     $ 14,843,007   $ 14,583,932  
    Less average goodwill and intangible assets   (812,761 )     (818,914 )     (825,531 )     (832,029 )     (839,787 )     (819,046 )   (811,483 )
    Average Tangible Assets $ 14,184,085     $ 14,020,793     $ 13,865,245     $ 13,906,005     $ 14,066,216     $ 14,023,961   $ 13,772,449  
    Return on Average Assets (ROA)   0.81 %     0.82 %     0.71 %     0.80 %     0.84 %     0.78 %   0.68 %
    Impact of removing average intangible assets and related amortization   0.18       0.18       0.18       0.19       0.20       0.18     0.20  
    Return on Average Tangible Assets (ROTA)   0.99       1.00       0.89       0.99       1.04       0.96     0.88  
    Impact of other adjustments for Adjusted Net Income   (0.01 )     —       0.15       0.05       0.08       0.05     0.27  
    Adjusted Return on Average Tangible Assets   0.98       1.00       1.04       1.04       1.12       1.01     1.15  
                             
    Pre-Tax Pre-Provision return on Average Tangible Assets   1.46       1.45       1.22       1.39       1.43       1.38     1.49  
    Impact of adjustments on Pre-Tax Pre-Provision earnings   0.01       —       0.20       0.09       0.12       0.06     0.36  
    Adjusted Pre-Tax Pre-Provision Return on Tangible Assets2   1.47 %     1.45 %     1.42 %     1.48 %     1.55 %     1.44 %   1.85 %
                             
    Average Shareholders’ Equity $ 2,168,444     $ 2,117,628     $ 2,118,381     $ 2,058,912     $ 2,072,747     $ 2,134,941   $ 2,014,083  
    Less average goodwill and intangible assets   (812,761 )     (818,914 )     (825,531 )     (832,029 )     (839,787 )     (819,046 )   (811,483 )
    Average Tangible Equity $ 1,355,683     $ 1,298,714     $ 1,292,850     $ 1,226,883     $ 1,232,960     $ 1,315,895   $ 1,202,600  
                             
    Return on Average Shareholders’ Equity   5.62 %     5.74 %     4.94 %     5.69 %     6.01 %     5.44 %   4.94 %
    Impact of removing average intangible assets and related amortization   4.69       5.01       4.61       5.53       5.89       4.77     5.15  
    Return on Average Tangible Common Equity (ROTCE)   10.31       10.75       9.55       11.22       11.90       10.21     10.09  
    Impact of other adjustments for Adjusted Net Income   (0.04 )     0.01       1.60       0.58       0.89       0.51     3.05  
    Adjusted Return on Average Tangible Common Equity   10.27 %     10.76 %     11.15 %     11.80 %     12.79 %     10.72 %   13.14 %
                             
    Loan interest income1 $ 151,282     $ 147,518     $ 147,308     $ 148,004     $ 150,048     $ 446,108   $ 433,821  
    Accretion on acquired loans   (9,182 )     (10,178 )     (10,595 )     (11,324 )     (14,843 )     (29,955 )   (45,365 )
    Loan interest income excluding accretion on acquired loans $ 142,100     $ 137,340     $ 136,713     $ 136,680     $ 135,205     $ 416,153   $ 388,456  
                             
    Yield on loans1   5.94       5.93       5.90       5.85       5.93       5.93     5.89  
    Impact of accretion on acquired loans   (0.36 )     (0.41 )     (0.42 )     (0.45 )     (0.59 )     (0.40 )   (0.61 )
    Yield on loans excluding accretion on acquired loans   5.58 %     5.52 %     5.48 %     5.40 %     5.34 %     5.53 %   5.89 %
                             
    Net Interest Income1 $ 106,975     $ 104,657     $ 105,298     $ 111,035     $ 119,505     $ 316,930   $ 378,009  
    Accretion on acquired loans   (9,182 )     (10,178 )     (10,595 )     (11,324 )     (14,843 )     (29,955 )   (45,365 )
    Net interest income excluding accretion on acquired loans $ 97,793     $ 94,479     $ 94,703     $ 99,711     $ 104,662     $ 286,975   $ 332,644  
                             
    Net Interest Margin   3.17       3.18       3.24       3.36       3.57       3.19     3.91  
    Impact of accretion on acquired loans   (0.27 )     (0.30 )     (0.33 )     (0.34 )     (0.44 )     (0.30 )   (0.47 )
    Net interest margin excluding accretion on acquired loans   2.90 %     2.87 %     2.91 %     3.02 %     3.13 %     2.89 %   3.44 %
                             
    Security interest income1 $ 26,005     $ 24,195     $ 22,434     $ 21,451     $ 21,520     $ 72,634   $ 61,913  
    Tax equivalent adjustment on securities   (8 )     (7 )     (7 )     (13 )     (22 )     (22 )   (71 )
    Security interest income excluding tax equivalent adjustment $ 25,997     $ 24,188     $ 22,427     $ 21,438     $ 21,498     $ 72,612   $ 61,842  
                             
    Loan interest income1 $ 151,282     $ 147,518     $ 147,308     $ 148,004     $ 150,048     $ 446,108   $ 433,821  
    Tax equivalent adjustment on loans   (302 )     (226 )     (213 )     (203 )     (177 )     (741 )   (517 )
    Loan interest income excluding tax equivalent adjustment $ 150,980     $ 147,292     $ 147,095     $ 147,801     $ 149,871     $ 445,367   $ 433,304  
                             
    Net Interest Income1 $ 106,975     $ 104,657     $ 105,298     $ 111,035     $ 119,505     $ 316,930   $ 378,009  
    Tax equivalent adjustment on securities   (8 )     (7 )     (7 )     (13 )     (22 )     (22 )   (71 )
    Tax equivalent adjustment on loans   (302 )     (226 )     (213 )     (203 )     (177 )     (741 )   (517 )
    Net interest income excluding tax equivalent adjustment $ 106,665     $ 104,424     $ 105,078     $ 110,819     $ 119,306     $ 316,167   $ 377,421  
                             
    1On a fully taxable equivalent basis. All yields and rates have been computed using amortized cost.    
    2As of 1Q’24, amortization of intangibles is excluded from adjustments to noninterest expense; prior periods have been updated to reflect the change.    

    The MIL Network –

    January 25, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Senator Murray Establishes & Funds Scientific Consortium in Washington State, Expanding NASA Footprint in PNW

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Washington State Patty Murray

    Murray wrote and passed the funding bill that provided the resources for this award and directly authored the provision to establish the BioS-ENDURES Consortium

    Seattle, WA – Today, U.S. Senator Patty Murray (D-WA), Chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee, announced a $2.5 million NASA award to establish a scientific consortium based at the University of Washington in partnership with Washington State University and the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory. The award was funded through a provision in the Fiscal Year 2024 government spending bill authored by Senator Murray to establish a consortium within the Biological and Physical Sciences—and resulted in the establishment of the Biology in Space: Establishing Networks for DUrable & REsilient Systems (BioS-ENDURES) Consortium. The BioS-ENDURESConsortium will focus on innovation, acceleration, and implementation of space biology specific knowledge and technology centered on human-plant-microbiome relationships to enable a durable human presence in low Earth orbit and beyond.  

    “As Chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee, I am writing our funding bills to invest in Washington state’s growing innovation economy,” said Senator Murray. “By establishing this scientific consortium here in Washington state, we are laying the groundwork to bring even more private and federal investment to our state’s growing aerospace industry. If we want to maintain our competitive edge, we have to stay at the forefront of scientific discovery—and this federal research partnership will help us do that. Investing in scientific discovery is an investment that pays off—this is a next chapter in a story of inquiry, invention, innovation, exploration, and discovery of new frontiers.”

    “The University of Washington is excited to have this opportunity to contribute to the development of new capabilities that will enable a sustainable human presence in space,” said Mari Ostendorf, Vice Provost of Research, University of Washington. “This consortium enables new partnerships and brings together investigators who have a long history with NASA and space applications with researchers who have deep expertise in human/animal, plant, and microbial biology. This research will push the boundaries of our scientific understanding to reveal new biological mechanisms that will address both sustainability and risk mitigation needs in space. We look forward working with WSU, PNNL, and NASA, as well as with other industry and science partners to accelerate space technology.”

    “This represents an exciting opportunity for the state of Washington to continue building our capacity for critical research to understand and improve human-plant-microbial systems for space habitation,” said Dr. Michael Wolcott, Interim Vice President of Research at Washington State University. “This work will have a direct contribution to humankind’s ability to travel—and live—in space. WSU is thrilled to be part of this collaborative effort with our colleagues at the University of Washington and the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory and looks forward to continuing this work with NASA.”

    “Pacific Northwest National Laboratory is thrilled to join forces with the University of Washington and Washington State University in the BioS-ENDURES consortium,” said Malin Young, Associate Laboratory Director, Earth and Biological Sciences. “Together, we’re harnessing our cutting-edge life science capabilities to help NASA achieve its mission of establishing a sustainable and lasting human presence in low Earth orbit, on the Moon, on Mars, and beyond.”

    A more thorough understanding is needed of mechanisms underlying responses to space-relevant stressors (ionizing radiation, microgravity, circadian disruption, abiotics, and biotics) to both humans and plant food sources and what role microbiomes may play in shaping those responses.  Human/animal, plant, and microbial biologists will work together to ensure an integrated view of the space flight biosphere by enhancing data acquisition, modeling, and testing.

    Human/animal, plant, and microbial biologists will work together to ensure an integrated view of the space flight biosphere by enhancing data acquisition, modeling, and testing. BioS-ENDURES has three thrust areas focusing on the effects of spaceflight stressors: 

    • Develop monitoring capabilities to measure underlying molecular status (biomarkers) of humans, animal models, plants and their associated microbial communities.
    • Build models to predict human-plant-microbe robustness and interactions among organisms in space.
    • Validate and apply understanding of human and plant health, including promoting beneficial human-plant-microbe interactions, to enhance health in space.

    The BioS-ENDURES Consortium is built upon a collaboration between the University of Washington, Washington State University, the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, and science and industry advisory boards. Consortium members will partner closely with NASA to align work with current and projected needs. Funding from NASA will support proof-of-principle demonstration projects each year to advance the science of the three thrusts, annual symposia tracks (some full consortium, some with tighter focus), and costs of physical testing.

    MIL OSI USA News –

    January 25, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Cassidy, Cotton, Colleagues to DOJ and FTC: Systemic, Weaponized Leaks Violate Ethics Rules

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Louisiana Bill Cassidy

    WASHINGTON – U.S. Senators Bill Cassidy, M.D. (R-LA), Tom Cotton (R-AR), Mitch McConnell (R-KY), Thom Tillis (R-NC), and Pete Ricketts (R-NE) demanded an investigation into systemic media leaks in a letter to Department of Justice (DOJ) Inspector General Michael Horowitz and Federal Trade Commissioner (FTC) Inspector General Andrew Katsaros. These leaks, all to the same media outlet, resulted in negative headlines about the Biden-Harris administration’s antitrust targets and potentially violated ethics rules.
    “These leaks result in negative headlines about the administration’s targets while the targeted companies have no way to respond, as they haven’t yet seen the potential lawsuits. Both DOJ and FTC have ethics rules that prohibit leaking civil cases before the cases are filed,” wrote the senators. 
    Read the full letter here or below: 
    Dear Inspectors General Horowitz and Katsaros,
    We write asking you to investigate whether the Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission have violated their own ethics rules by systematically leaking potential antitrust cases to a specific media outlet.
    Since 2023, Bloomberg News has broken the news in at least twelve instances that DOJ or FTC was “preparing” or “poised” to take legal action before a lawsuit was filed. Indeed, the same journalist reported on eleven of these cases. This pattern strongly suggests that certain officials at DOJ and FTC are intentionally publicizing legal action days or weeks before filing.
    These leaks result in negative headlines about the administration’s targets while the targeted companies have no way to respond, as they haven’t yet seen the potential lawsuits. Both DOJ and FTC have ethics rules that prohibit leaking civil cases before the cases are filed.
    Bloomberg News reporting DOJ and FTC antitrust actions before the filing of a lawsuit

    January 23, 2023: DOJ Poised to Sue Google Over Digital Ad Market Dominance
    February 23, 2023: DOJ Preps Antitrust Suit to Block Adobe’s $20 Billion Figma Deal
    May 15, 2023: Amgen’s $28 Billion Horizon Deal Faces Unexpected FTC Hurdle
    June 29, 2023: Lina Khan Is Coming for Amazon, Armed With an FTC Antitrust Suit
    October 16, 2023: Real Estate Brokers Pocketing Up to 6% in Fees Draw Antitrust Scrutiny
    February 20, 2024: FTC, States to Sue Over Kroger-Albertsons Deal Next Week
    March 20, 2024: Justice Department to Sue Apple for Antitrust Violations
    April 10, 2024: Nippon Steel Bid to Buy US Steel Gets Extended Antitrust Review
    April 17, 2024: Tapestry’s $8.5 Billion Capri Deal Faces Planned FTC Lawsuit
    May 22, 2024: US Justice Department to Seek Breakup of Live Nation-Ticketmaster
    July 10, 2024: FTC Preparing Suit Against Drug Middlemen Over Insulin Rebates
    September 23, 2024: Visa Faces Justice Department Antitrust Case on Debit Cards

    These leaks aren’t just unethical, but they harm these companies’ employees, shareholders, and others. If the companies have engaged in wrongdoing, by all means the government should try them in a court of law. But the Biden-Harris administration shouldn’t try them in the liberal media. These leaks appear to be simply one more instance of this administration weaponizing the administrative state against politically disfavored opponents and critics, much like DOJ investigating parents at school-board meetings or the FTC targeting Elon Musk and Twitter for insufficient censorship of conservatives.
    We urge you to investigate promptly these systematic, unethical, and potentially illegal leaks.

    MIL OSI USA News –

    January 25, 2025
  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Secretary of State for Northern Ireland speech at the British-Irish Chamber of Commerce

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    Speech by Rt Hon Hilary Benn MP, Secretary of State for Northern Ireland.

    Location:
    Dublin, Republic of Ireland
    Delivered on:
    24 October 2024 (Speaker’s notes, may differ from delivered version)

    Good afternoon. It’s a great pleasure to be with you all today.

    Go raibh míle maith agaibh.

    I would like to extend my thanks to John McGrane and Paul Lynam for your very kind invitation and sharing my congratulations to Marie Doyle on her recent appointment as President of this wonderful organisation.

    Now, many people in Britain might assume that the British-Irish Chamber of Commerce has a long and distinguished history. It is certainly distinguished but it’s not very long, having been founded only in 2011. But it feels to me and I’m sure to you much older, such is the strength of the ties that bind our two countries together.

    Two countries that share so much… in terms of history, culture, ideas, politics and friendships.

    And it is a story that runs like a thread through these islands and through the lives of so many of our families, including my own: on my side, it was an Ulster Scot from Fermanagh who took that journey that millions made across the Atlantic to Ohio from where my mother came and, on my wife’s side, Irish Catholics from  Mayo and Kilkenny and Cork, her grandfather was born in Monkstown.

    And talking of families, you may be aware that I come from a family best known for politics. What you may be less aware of is that two of my great grandfathers were Victorian entrepreneurs.

    One – Peter Eadie – designed and made ring travellers for the textile industry working out of the upstairs of a terraced house in Galashiels, in Scotland.

    The other – John Benn – was very good at drawing and decided to found a furniture trade magazine which, with great prescience – given the posts that his son, grandson and great grandson – that’s me – all went on to hold, he decided to call it “ The Cabinet Maker.“ You couldn’t make it up.

    Both of those grandfathers entered politics as elected councillors as they put their business minds, industriousness and civic virtues at the service of the public.

    So, if I may say so, it is in that spirit of innovation and constructive endeavour that I address you today.

    Now the history of these islands has not always been benign. Over the centuries there have been terrible wrongs, great violence, revolution, bitterness but in recent years – reconciliation and progress in ways that would have seemed impossible in the past.

    It was a great pleasure last night to see the play Agreement at the Gate Theatre, which so powerfully depicts the events leading up to that miraculous Good Friday in 1998. That agreement eventually resulted in something – I must be frank – I never thought I would see in my lifetime. I grew up watching reporting of the Troubles on the television, reading about it in the papers, and to witness a unionist and a nationalist sitting side by side in government together – that truly was the impossible made possible. And today Northern Ireland is a very different place. 

    Why? 

    Because of the courageous political leadership shown in the play last night and many others showed.

    We must never lose sight of how far we have come across these shared islands since then. I want to say very clearly and directly: The Government’s commitment to the Good Friday Agreement – in letter and in spirit – is absolute. And that our support for the European Convention on Human Rights, which underpins the Agreement, and to the rule of law is unwavering.

    My priority as Secretary of State for Northern Ireland – above all else – is to support political stability and economic growth. 

    And critical to that stability and critical to that growth in Northern Ireland is a healthy and constructive relationship between the Irish and UK governments.

    And from day one, this new Government has been absolutely determined to seize the opportunity to restore trust, friendship and collaboration between our two countries. And as Paul just set out, the Prime Minister and the Taoiseach have made their joint commitment to this reset,  which will be underpinned by annual summits, in addition to the existing Strand 3 institutions.

    You’ve heard about the visits the British ministers have made and colleagues from here over to Westminster, and all of those are practical expressions of that commitment to a new and better relationship. 

    And talking of new relationships, the restoration of the Executive and Assembly in February was a hugely important moment for Northern Ireland – after too many years in which devolved government was not functioning. And it is vital that we now do all we can to ensure that this stability endures.

    Stable and devolved government and political representation at Stormont matters above all for the people of Northern Ireland  – they need a government and an Assembly that work for them.

    But it also matters enormously for businesses right across Ireland, the United Kingdom and beyond. What do businesses and potential investors say they want? Stability. Political stability. 

    I am really impressed by the partnership that Michelle O’Neill and Emma Little-Pengelly have forged and the Executive now has a Programme for Government and a Fiscal Sustainability Plan.

    And Northern Ireland has a great opportunity to make the most of its unique access to both the British and the European markets to help the economy to grow and to create jobs.

    And that is what you do as the British Irish Chamber in promoting trade, prosperity and progress across these islands.

    Now we are still having to manage the consequences of the UK’s decision to leave the European Union, in a way that does not unnecessarily inhibit trade and commerce across the Irish Sea. That is why this Government is absolutely committed to fully implementing the Windsor Framework, pragmatically and in good faith.

    It is not without its challenges – I think that is probably the understatement of the year – but it is necessary. And there is a much bigger prize in sight.

    The Government is committed to improving the UK’s trading relationship with the EU, including through the negotiation of a sanitary and phyto-sanitary agreement which would have the potential to dramatically smooth the movement of food, animals and plants across the Irish Sea.

    One of the joys of my job is that everywhere I go in Northern Ireland I see talent, ingenuity and enterprise.

    I see world class businesses operating in the life sciences, high-tech engineering, making composite aircraft wings and building the buses of the future – electric and hydrogen – services and film and television, education.

    I am really struck that all these firms have seen something in Northern Ireland and its people.

    And my message to investors is simply this.

    Come, look, see, believe, invest in Northern Ireland.

    Just look at the opportunities for the UK and Irish Governments to work collaboratively on areas and projects to help improve growth in Northern Ireland, in the Republic of Ireland including in its border regions.

    Areas which are summed up by the four pillars which will form the basis of the annual leaders’ summits.

    We need this collaboration not only because it is in our mutual economic interest, but because in these very uncertain times, we face shared challenges which our shared values and our shared commitment to democracy and the rule of law, will help us to face up to.

    What do we need to do?

    We need to ensure stability in an unstable world.

    We need to build economic growth.

    We need to make sure we have the infrastructure to enable that growth and attract that investment.

    We have got to invest in skills. 

    We’ve got to make the transition to net zero – what a fantastic opportunity for businesses if you just think about changing the way we heat our homes. There are a lot of heat pumps that will have to be built and installed, and we together on these islands should be making them.

    Building new energy infrastructure which will be required to power those heat pumps and the electric buses, cooperating on energy resilience – not least given the huge potential across these islands for more wind power – and the investment in Northern Ireland from GB Energy, the UK’s new publicly owned, clean energy company, which in turn will support the Shared Electricity Market.

    At the same time, we only have to look around us to see the risks from conflict, climate change and the loss of biodiversity. Biodiversity is not a like-to-have, it is the very stuff on which human existence is based.  

    If you pause for a moment and look around you, every single thing we see is a gift from what is on the surface of the earth and beneath it. The genius of the human mind is that we have taken those gifts and look at what we have built. Look at what we have created, look at what we have fashioned.  

    And given the increasingly uncertain geopolitics of the world, it also makes sense for the UK and Ireland to collaborate on confronting the threats we face, whether in relation to cyber security, terrorism, organised crime or the threat from Russia and other states.

    And in doing all of this, the sense I get from the vast majority of people is they would like us to move forward and to try and build a better future that we can jointly embrace.

    So let us be bold, let us get on with it and let us take inspiration from those who 26 years ago truly made the impossible possible. 

    Finally, why do the relationships that I have spoken about matter so much?

    They are clearly important economically, but they are also about something else – it’s about building alliances so we can deal with the risks and take advantage of the opportunities.

    All of these are powerful reasons why we should work together closely.

    Ireland and the United Kingdom.

    Two proud nations with everything to gain from a close partnership, for as the great W B Yeats reminded us:

    “There are no strangers here. Only friends you haven’t yet met.”

     Thank you.

    Updates to this page

    Published 24 October 2024

    MIL OSI United Kingdom –

    January 25, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA News: Remarks by Vice President Harris in Press Gaggle | Philadelphia,  PA

    Source: The White House

    Warwick Hotel Rittenhouse Square Philadelphia
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

    1:27 P.M. EDT

    THE VICE PRESIDENT:  Oh, hi, guys. 

         Q    Hello.

    THE VICE PRESIDENT:  Okay.  Good morning — or af- —

         Q    Good afternoon.

    THE VICE PRESIDENT:  — afternoon.  Good afternoon.  Good afternoon.

    Well, let me start by saying I’m really very proud to announce that we’ve had some endorsements this morning, as we’ve been rolling out endorsements, by two leaders in the Republican Party: the mayor of Waukesha and then, of course, former Representative Fred Upton.

    And this continues to be, I think, evidence of the fact that people who have been leaders in our country, regardless of their political party, understand what’s at stake.  And they are weighing in — courageously, in many cases — in support of what we need to have, which is a president of the United States who understands the obligation to uphold the Constitution of the United States and our democracy.

    As for last night, yet again, Trump not showing up, refused to be a part of a CNN debate.  And clearly, his staff has been saying he’s exhausted.  And the sad part about that is he’s trying to be president of the United States, probably the toughest job in the world, and he’s exhausted.

    I said last night what I mean, which is the American people are being presented with a very serious decision, and it includes what we must understand will happen, starting on January 20th, in this choice. 

    Either you have the choice of a Donald Trump, who will sit in the Oval Office stewing, plotting revenge, retribution, writing out his enemies list, or what I will be doing, which is responding to folks like the folks last night with a to-do list, understanding the need to work on lifting up the American people, whether it be through the issue of grocery prices and bringing them down or investing in our economy, investing in our small businesses, investing in our families.

    Happy to take any questions.

         Q    Madam Vice President, you will be back in Philadelphia with members of your team on Monday, former President Barack Obama, as well as Bruce Springsteen.

    THE VICE PRESIDENT:  Yes.

         Q    Do you — can you tell us where you — that may be? 

    And secondly, any other, as we would say, heavy hitters in your campaign planning to come to Philadelphia in the lead-up to Election Day?

    THE VICE PRESIDENT:  Well, I’m very honored to have the support of former President Obama.  As you know, he’s been on the campaign trail and has been really wonderful and extraordinary in terms of the time and effort that he’s putting into our campaign.  And people like Bruce Springsteen, to have their support — and, of course, he is an American icon — I think it just shows the breadth and depth of the support that we have and also the enthusiasm that a lot of people are bringing to the campaign and feel about our campaign.

    Q    Any other big names we can share?

    THE VICE PRESIDENT:  I have nothing to report at this moment.  (Laughs.)

    Q    (Inaudible.)

    THE VICE PRESIDENT:  Stay tuned, however.

    Q    Vice President, what do you make of the gender gap in this election?  Why do you think you have stronger support among women than the former president?

    THE VICE PRESIDENT:  Well, I have to be honest with you, it’s not what I see in terms of my rallies, in terms of the interactions I’m having with people in communities and — and on the ground.  What I am seeing is e- — in equal measure, men and women talking about their concerns about the future of our democracy; talking about the fact that they want a president who leads with optimism and takes on the challenges that we face, whether it be grocery prices or investing in small businesses or homeownership. 

    So, I’m not actually seeing that kind of disparity, and I intend to be a president for all Americans.  And that includes paying attention, yes, to a fundamental freedom that has been taken away because of Donald Trump — the freedom of a woman to make decisions about her own body — and, in equal measure, to prioritize the economic needs of individuals and families in America and what we also must do in terms of upholding our strength and standing on the global stage.

    Q    Madam Vice President —

    Q    Madam Vice President —

    THE VICE PRESIDENT:   You all sort that out, okay?  (Laughter.)

    Q    How are you going to vote on Prop 36 in California? You are a California voter.  Do California and other states need to punish drug and theft crimes more harshly?

    THE VICE PRESIDENT:  So, I have not yet voted, and I have not yet had the chance to read through the ballot.  I will keep you posted on that.

    AIDE:  We have time for one more question.

    Q    Madam Vice President, this topic was brought up last night, but will construction of a southern border wall continue in your administration?

    THE VICE PRESIDENT:  I will tell you that my highest priority is to put the resources into ensuring that our border is secure, which is why I’ve been very clear: I’m going to bring back up, as president, that bipartisan border security bill and make sure that it is brought to my desk so I can sign it into law. 

    The biggest issue that we have right now is that Donald Trump has stood in the way of what would have been a proven part of the solution to the bigger problem, which is that we have a broken immigration system in America, and we need to fix it.  And we have the tools at hand, but we have on the other side of this election, Donald Trump, who would prefer to run on a problem instead of fixing a problem. 

    I intend to fix the problem in a way that is just about practical solutions that are within our arms reach if we have the commitment to do it. 

    Okay?  Thank you.

    MIL OSI USA News –

    January 25, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Canada: Manitoba Government Continues to Combat Retail Theft Over Holiday Season

    Source: Government of Canada regional news

    October 24, 2024

    Manitoba Government Continues to Combat Retail Theft Over Holiday Season


    The Manitoba government is continuing to support the efforts of the Winnipeg Police Service (WPS) in combating retail theft throughout the holiday season, Justice Minister Matt Wiebe announced today.

    “We’re grateful to the Winnipeg Police Service and their members who have made such a positive impact throughout the summer and fall for businesses and community members,” said Wiebe. “Over the summer, people in the Exchange District, Osborne Village, the West End and other parts of the city have said they feel safer. We look forward to maintaining that momentum throughout the holiday season.”

    In addition to building on the success of the retail theft and violent crime overtime initiative, 12 new provincially funded Winnipeg police officers begin patrols next month to provide a visible presence and engage with the community in specified areas. The minister noted the use of overtime for focused enforcement and crime prevention will continue.

    “Over the last number of months, WPS members have renewed their connection with the community through engagements and interactions that help foster trust and confidence,” said acting chief Arthur Stannard, Winnipeg Police Service. “The Winnipeg Police Service appreciates the support of the Manitoba government and the funding that has helped make this possible. I would also extend further thanks to the citizens, business owners, and our police officers for their efforts and commitments to enhance the safety of our communities.”

    The enhanced police response to retail crime and violence is another important component of efforts to ensure safety in core areas of Winnipeg, the minister noted. Related initiatives include nearly $1.5 million from the Manitoba government, mayor’s office and the Downtown Winnipeg BIZ for the Downtown Community Safety Partnership and development of a voluntary safe sobering centre at N’Dinawemak – Our Relatives’ Place at 190 Disraeli Fwy.

    “The impact of the retail theft initiative has been phenomenal, as provincial funding has allowed Winnipeg Police Service to more effectively respond to the safety and security issues retail stores have been facing for too long,” said John Graham, director of government relations (prairie region), Retail Council of Canada. “We are grateful that this support will continue and help support retailers as they head into the very busy and important holiday shopping season.”

    Over the summer and fall, the Manitoba government has provided $1.9 million to support an increased police presence in areas identified by the WPS.

    – 30 –

    MIL OSI Canada News –

    January 25, 2025
  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Awards – New Zealand Muslim Women hit the world stage as finalists in global awards

    Source: Islamic Women’s Council New Zealand (ICWNZ) 

    25 October 2024 – A small New Zealand charity dedicated to uplifting the lives of Muslim women across the nation has been named as a finalist in an international Shorty Awards alongside major global brands and their marketing teams.   The Shorty Impact Awards honour the best and most impactful digital and social media campaigns, projects, and initiatives that address pressing global issues.

    In June this year, the Islamic Women’s Council New Zealand (ICWNZ) launched the CHILL campaign to empower New Zealand Muslim women, challenge hate and gendered stereotypes, and pass the mic to local women to tell their own stories.

    CHILL stands for Challenge Islamophobic Language and Loathing, and the campaign featured eight Muslim women’s personal stories told through their voices as they go about their lives – working, teaching, creating and sharing moments of joy in their communities. All videos end with the participant saying, “Just CHILL, New Zealand, we’ve got this!”– indicating the country, as a whole, can get in front of the challenges facing Muslim women.

    The campaign has been selected as a finalist in the Shorty Impact Awards, an international competition celebrating social impact campaigns. Other finalists include major brands like Amazon, Doritos, L’Oreal and Searchlight Pictures, international marketing agencies  and large international NGOs.

    “The entire campaign was conceived in-house,” says IWCNZ National Coordinator Aliya Danzeisen adding, “We wanted to create awareness about our community and to encourage New Zealanders to challenge Islamophobic language and stereotypes about Muslim women by empowering women themselves to share their joys, triumphs and challenges in their own words. The response was far more positive than we could have ever expected.”

    The campaign was produced by local production company Eyes and Ears and had a shoestring advertising budget exclusively targeting a New Zealand audience. CHILL content reached over 300,000 New Zealanders, with videos going viral locally for a small country, as well as reaching global audiences.

    All awards finalists are eligible for an Audience Honor award, so IWCNZ is asking their community and all New Zealanders to get behind the CHILL campaign and vote for it as their people’s choice in both categories. Voting is open to anyone internationally. 

    “Watching the CHILL campaign grow from an idea into something that has touched people’s hearts has been amazing. It started as a dream, and now it’s creating real change, both in our community and internationally. Seeing this impact has been a powerful reminder of what we can achieve when we come together. For me, we’re winners already.” says ICWNZ Project Manager Shabina Shamsudeen.

    Further information and campaign background:

    In recent years, social media has been an increasingly hostile space for Muslims. This is no different in New Zealand, where in 2019, a terror attack killed 51 Muslims in their places of worship, forcing New Zealanders to grapple with the impacts of Islamophobia and anti-immigrant hate. 

    Muslim women in New Zealand face a challenging combination of Islamaphobia and gendered abuse, including increasing online hatred, physical assault and harassment, particularly for women who wear hijab.

    Through CHILL, the Islamic Women’s Council of New Zealand (IWCNZ) sought to challenge that by leveraging the positive power of social media to connect and amplify their stories. 

    CHILL also sought to empower non-Muslim New Zealanders with material to challenge stereotypes when they encounter gendered Islamophobia in their wider communities. The team decided that through showcasing the diverse lives of Muslim women throughout New Zealand, CHILL would focus on the joy, strength, community belonging and leadership of New Zealand Muslim women, inspiring more people to counter hate. 

    Alongside a small local production company Eyes and Ears, director Calvin Sang, and photographer Ankita Singh, the creative team behind CHILL also reflects and celebrates New Zealand’s diversity. 

    The campaign was not without its challenges, including securing funding. After a highly competitive grant process, IWCNZ was awarded a small amount of funding from the New Zealand Government to make CHILL a reality. However, the campaign budget remained tight, and the IWCNZ team relied on their creativity, connections, and skills to ensure this campaign’s impact and production value punched above its weight.

    The team also worked to ensure a high duty of care to their participants. As Aliya outlines:

    “Our campaign delivery involved dedicated monitoring of social media, with clear processes in place to support our participants if they encountered any abuse through their involvement with the campaign,”

    CHILL launched in June 2024 with a community celebration featuring participants and their families. Over the next ten weeks, content rolled out across Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, TikTok, and Twitter. 

    The campaign highlights the unique journeys, challenges and successes of Muslim women in New Zealand through eight personal stories:

    • Anjuman – an assistant principal who works at a special needs school.
    • Heba – a yoga and wellness instructor who provides free classes to her community.
    • Samadiana – a gymnast, coach and a nursing student.
    • Naeema – an artist who runs creative workshops and works in cancer prevention.
    • Hend – A public servant with a PhD in Politics and International Relations, working to make organisations more inclusive. 
    • Nesra – a primary school teacher and former refugee who is now a teacher at the school she once attended, and proudly encourages all to embrace their multiple identities.
    • Rizwangul – a former asylum seeker, a Fulbright scholar with two Master’s Degrees. and now a community worker who helps refugees and migrants settle and thrive in New Zealand.
    • Ugeshni – an operations engineer, outdoor enthusiast and YouTuber working on living more holistically.

    Given that CHILL confronts and provides a counterbalance to online hostility, the IWCNZ team was prepared to encounter some bad-faith engagements. Instead, they were thrilled to receive an outpouring of enthusiastic support from New Zealand and around the world. 

    The campaign had a shoestring advertising budget, exclusively targeting a New Zealand audience. CHILL content reached over 300,000 New Zealanders, with videos going viral locally for a small country, as well as reaching global audiences.

    Some examples of the reach of the campaign include: on Instagram, the campaign teaser was viewed over 57,000 times. Nesra’s story was especially popular, reaching 55,000 views. On Facebook, Hend’s story gained nearly 14,000 impressions.

    Within New Zealand, the campaign has been highlighted by a range of group, the Human Rights Commission, Race Relations Day, nationwide media like Radio New Zealand, government ministries like the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet and high-profile organisations like Sport New Zealand.

    Globally, CHILL has also been picked up and share.  

    Most importantly, the campaign has been energising and powerful for the participants themselves.

    “By taking part in this campaign, I’ve felt a profound sense of purpose—helping inspire others while building awareness of the strength, diversity, and beauty within our community.” – Naeema

    MIL OSI New Zealand News –

    January 25, 2025
  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Wellington – Poll shows 3 in 4 Wellington residents oppose council spending on cycleways

    Source: Business Central

    As Wellington City Council reviews its Long-Term Plan, a new Wellington Chamber of Commerce-Curia poll shows a significant majority of Wellington City residents believe the council is spending too much on cycleways.
    The poll shows three quarters of residents believe Wellington City Council is spending “too much” on its cycleway program.
    Voters of the five largest political parties believe the council is overspending on cycleways, including 51% of Green Party voters.
    Overall, 76% of Wellington residents believe the council is spending too much on the bicycle network.
    17% believe the spending is “about right”; 3% say it’s “too little”; 4% say they’re “unsure”.
    The poll of 1099 Wellington city residents was conducted between September 15 and September 25, with a representative sample of the population in terms of gender, age and ward.
    Respondents were asked the following question:
    Wellington City Council has spent $52 million dollars on cycleways in the past three years, an average of $642 per household. It is planning to spend another $56 million on cycleways over the next three years. Do you believe this level of spending is – too much, too little or about right?
    Wellington City Council’s Long-Term Plan (LTP) includes $115m of capital expenditure on the cycle network in the next 10 years, as set out on Page 100 of the 2024-34 Long-term Plan Volume 2.
    It comes as Wellington City Council revisits the spending in its LTP. The city’s 10-year budget will now have to be amended after the council reversed its decision to sell its shares in Wellington Airport.
    Wellington Chamber of Commerce CEO Simon Arcus says it’s time to review all of council’s spending, including the bike network plan.
    “This is the first definitive survey of Wellington residents on cycleways. It is fairer and far more compelling than the conclusions from public consultation for the Long-Term Plan and the cycle network surveys, which never consulted the public on cost,” says Mr Arcus.
    “Put simply, the council needs to stop talking how much it will be spending and start thinking about how much it has to spend, with revenue as the starting point. Council must be working on a plan to reduce rates for Wellington resident and businesses,” he said.
    “There can be no non-negotiables in the process of re-drafting the LTP. All options need to be on the table, and that includes the transport network.
    “Let us be clear that we do support cycleways, as part of an integrated transport network – one where investment is equitable and based on the needs of every resident. Right now that isn’t the case,” said Mr Arcus.
    “This poll shows three quarters of Wellington residents believe the council is over-spending on the cycle network.
    “The collapse of the LTP process is a profound signal the current ideas have failed and new principles for expenditure need to be considered.
    “Let’s think more strategically about alternatives to the cycle spend and look closely at the success of Te Kāinga Te Pu, part of Wellington City Council’s Te Kāinga Affordable Rental Programme. This has been an excellent initiative, converting vacant office space to affordable residential living. People can live in the heart of the city with improved quality of life and sustainable outcomes without the need to build extensive cycleways.
    “There is a lot more work to do to make sure the LTP sets Wellington up for a prosperous future. We think the council has to look at this through the right framework and will contribute more on that soon,” said Mr Arcus.
    It also follows the decision of Local Government Minister Simeon Brown to appoint a Crown Observer to oversee the council’s management of the LTP.
    “We welcome this decision by Minister Brown to bring order and accountability to the council table.
    “Wellington faces many tough decisions that are crucial to its future. Rewriting the city’s Long-Term Plan months after its passing is a significant and unusual step. It’s important that everything is on the table when projects have to be cut.
    “Wellington’s rate rises are among the highest in the country, and that isn’t sustainable in the short or long term.
    “This is a vital opportunity to revisit the council’s budget and ensure it’s focused on the things that matter, not pet projects and nice-to-haves.
    “A Crown Observer will assist in that process. We encourage the council to heed the Observer’s advice, listen to ratepayers and the business community for the many decisions that are still to come.”
    Note:
    Business Central is the home of the Wellington Chamber of Commerce and part of the BusinessNZ network, alongside EMA, Business Canterbury and Business South. 

    MIL OSI New Zealand News –

    January 25, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Agriculture Recovery Resource Day to Take Place in Grayson County, Va., on Oct. 29

    Source: US Federal Emergency Management Agency

    Headline: Agriculture Recovery Resource Day to Take Place in Grayson County, Va., on Oct. 29

    Agriculture Recovery Resource Day to Take Place in Grayson County, Va., on Oct. 29

    BRISTOL, Va.— Helene caused over $159 million in agricultural damage and farm losses in southwest Virginia, according to a recent assessment by the Virginia Cooperative Extension. Commonwealth, federal and local agencies will be coming together in day-long events dedicated to agricultural recovery to share information and resources with impacted producers. The commonwealth of Virginia, USDA and FEMA are jointly organizing an Agricultural Recovery Resource Day on Tuesday, Oct. 29, from 9 a.m. to 7 p.m. in Grayson County. The event will take place at the Mountain View Baptist Church at 112 Mountain View Road in Independence, Va. At least two additional, day-long events are also being planned for the week of Nov. 3 in Wythe and Washington counties. Southwest Virginia farmers and agricultural producers whose operations were affected by Helene can attend any event and can arrive any time from 9 a.m. to 7 p.m. For the latest information, please visit the event website: fema.gov/event/hurricane-helene-virginia-agricultural-recovery-resource-day“Multiple organizations, including federal, commonwealth, and local agencies have come together to help agricultural community recover from Tropical Storm Helene. The first Agriculture Recovery Resource Day will be an opportunity for farmers, private forest owners, and agribusiness owners to receive information and speak directly to representatives from over 15 agencies,” said FEMA Federal Coordinating Officer Timothy Pheil. “We understand the critical role agribusinesses play in Virginia’s economy, and through the Agriculture Recovery Resource Days, we’re working to provide farmers with direct access to the tools and resources they need to bounce back stronger than ever.”“Recovery is a long process. The commonwealth is working to coordinate resources for the agricultural community that was impacted by Tropical Storm Helene,”, said VDEM State Coordinating Officer Shawn Talmadge. “We welcome any farmers to the first Agriculture Recovery Resource Day in Grayson County”.The following agencies will be present on Agriculture Recovery Resource Day to answer questions about grants, loans and other resources available for the agricultural community: Federal agencies: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) USDA Farm Service Agency (USDA FSA) USDA National Resources Conservation Agency (USDA NRCS) USDA Rural Development (USDA RD) Commonwealth agencies:Virginia Department of Emergency Management Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer ServicesVirginia Department of ForestryVirginia Department of Conservation and RecreationVirginia Department of Environmental QualityVirginia Cooperative ExtensionVirginia Department of HealthVirginia Tobacco Region Revitalization CommissionVirginia Small Business Financing AuthorityLocal agencies and organizations: Soil and Water Conservation DistrictsAgriSafeVirginia Farm Bureau Virginia Cattlemen’s Association Farm Credit of the Virginias First Bank & TrustMount Rogers Health DistrictGrayson CountyFarming is an economic driver in southwest Virginia and recovery for agribusiness is essential for long-term, sustainable recovery after Helene. The federal government and commonwealth are here to support recovery for the whole community. For additional disaster recovery resources, visit vaemergency.gov,  the Virginia Department of Emergency Management Facebook page , fema.gov/disaster/4831 and facebook.com/FEMA.  ###FEMA’s mission is helping people before, during, and after disasters. FEMA Region 3’s jurisdiction includes Delaware, the District of Columbia, Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia and West Virginia. Follow us on X at x.com/FEMAregion3 and on LinkedIn at linkedin.com/company/femaregion3.To apply for FEMA assistance, please call the FEMA Helpline at 1-800-621-3362, visit https://www.disasterassistance.gov/, or download and apply on the FEMA App. If you use a relay service, such as video relay service (VRS), captioned telephone service or others, give FEMA the number for that service. Multilingual operators are available (press 2 for Spanish and 3 for other languages). Disaster recovery assistance is available without regard to race, color, religion, nationality, sex, age, disability, English proficiency, or economic status.
    erika.osullivan
    Thu, 10/24/2024 – 20:31

    MIL OSI USA News –

    January 25, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Governor Katie Hobbs and Local Leaders Applaud ADWR Steps Toward Protecting Arizona’s Water

    Source: US State of Arizona

    Phoenix, AZ —Today, Governor Katie Hobbs, local vineyard owner Mark Jorve, farmer Ed Curry, and resident Steve Kisiel issued statements in support of the Arizona Department of Water Resources announcing the Notice of Initiation of Designation Procedures for a potential Willcox Groundwater Basin AMA.

    “When I traveled to Willcox, I heard stories from farmers, local well owners, and a bipartisan group of elected officials who are concerned about their community’s future because of groundwater depletion,” said Governor Katie Hobbs. “I saw dried up wells, fissures in the earth, and farms struggling to survive because of unchecked pumping of the precious water that Arizonans rely on. As the Department of Water Resources begins this important process, I look forward to hearing more from Arizonans concerned about securing our water future. 

    “For too long, politicians have stuck their heads in the sand and refused to take action to fix the problems Arizonans face. I won’t. I know protecting our water isn’t a Democratic or a Republican issue, it’s an Arizona issue. I will continue to put politics aside and work across the aisle to deliver the solutions Arizonans are desperate for.”

    “We support and welcome this step taken towards protecting our water supplies. As a small business vineyard in the Willcox groundwater basin we’ve experienced firsthand the alarming declines in our local water levels due to decades of unchecked, unlimited groundwater pumping,” said Mark Jorve, owner of Zarpara Vineyard. “An AMA designation would finally put us on a path to stabilizing this precious and shared resource to safeguard local growers and business owners.”

    “When a situation becomes a crisis, it demands action,” said fourth-generation Arizona farmer, Ed Curry. “This announcement of a potential AMA is a new beginning for the Willcox Basin, and we must continue to work together to move forward to protect our groundwater supplies. I am thankful for the courage of Governor Hobbs and her administration to tackle these issues head on.”

    “Today’s announcement by ADWR to initiate the AMA designation process gives me hope that we will finally have a secure water future here in the Willcox Basin,” said Willcox basin homeowner Steve Kisiel. “For too many years legislative and executive inaction to protect rural groundwater in Arizona has led to severe consequences for myself and my neighbors. While today’s announcement is just the first step on our journey toward a better water future, we can finally see a solution on the horizon. Thank you to ADWR and Governor Hobbs for your historic work to preserve our groundwater supplies.”

    The action comes after Governor Hobbs visited the Willcox basin to examine the effects of unlimited groundwater pumping, including dried wells and earth fissures, and met with local officials and everyday Arizonans to hear more about their experiences with groundwater depletion. Groundwater conditions in the Willcox Basin have declined at alarming rates, making it one of the most endangered groundwater basins in the state. 

    The Notice of Initiation of Designation Procedures is the first step in ADWR considering designating an Active Management Area in the Willcox Groundwater Basin. As a part of that process, ADWR is accepting comments and will hold a public hearing at 1:00 p.m. on November 22, 2024, at the Willcox Community Center. 

    More information on groundwater conditions in the Willcox Basin can be found HERE.

    MIL OSI USA News –

    January 25, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Defense Contractor Sentenced to 15 Months in Prison for Fraud, Money Laundering, and Unlawful Export of Technical Data

    Source: US State of California

    Yuksel Senbol, 36, of Orlando, Florida, was sentenced today to 15 months in prison for conspiracy to defraud the United States, conspiracy to commit wire fraud, wire fraud, conspiracy to commit money laundering, money laundering, conspiracy to violate the Export Control Reform Act, violating the Export Control Reform Act, and violating the Arms Export Control Act. As part of her sentence, the court also entered an order of forfeiture in the amount of $275,430.90, the proceeds of Senbol’s fraud and money laundering scheme. Senbol entered pleaded guilty on May 7.

    According to facts taken from public filings, beginning in approximately April 2019, Senbol operated a front company in the Middle District of Florida called Mason Engineering Parts LLC. She used this front company to assist her co-conspirators, Mehmet Ozcan and Onur Simsek, to fraudulently procure contracts to supply critical military components to the Department of Defense. These components were intended for use in the Navy Nimitz and Ford Class Aircraft Carriers, Navy Submarines, Marine Corps Armored Vehicles, and Army M-60 Series Tank and Abrahams Battle Tanks, among other weapons systems.

    To fraudulently procure the government contracts, Senbol and her co-conspirators falsely represented to the U.S. government and U.S. military contractors that Mason Engineering Parts LLC was a vetted and qualified manufacturer of military components, when in fact, the parts were being manufactured by Ozcan and Simsek in Turkey. As Senbol knew, Simsek’s involvement had to be concealed from the U.S. government because he had been debarred from contracting with the U.S. government after being convicted of a virtually identical scheme in the Southern District of Florida.

    In order to enable Ozcan and Simsek to manufacture the components in Turkey, Senbol assisted them in obtaining sensitive, export-controlled drawings of critical U.S. military technology. Using software that allowed Ozcan to remotely control her computer — and thus evade security restrictions that limited access to these sensitive military drawings to computers within the United States — Senbol knowingly facilitated the illegal export of these drawings. She did so despite having executed numerous agreements promising to safeguard the drawings from unlawful access or export, and in spite of the clear warnings on the face of each drawing that it could not be exported without obtaining a license.

    Once Ozcan and Simsek manufactured the components in Turkey, they shipped them to Senbol, who repackaged them — making sure to remove any reference to their Turkish origin. The conspirators then lied about the origin of the parts to the U.S. government and a U.S. government contractor to receive payment for the parts. Senbol then laundered hundreds of thousands of dollars in criminal proceeds back to Turkey through international wire transfers.

    This scheme continued until uncovered and disrupted by federal investigators. Parts supplied by Senbol were tested by the U.S. military and were determined not to conform with product specifications. Many of the components supplied to the U.S. military by Senbol were “critical application items,” meaning that failure of these components would have potentially rendered the end system inoperable.

    Alleged co-conspirators Mehmet Ozcan and Onur Simsek are fugitives.

    The General Services Administration, Office of Inspector General; Defense Criminal Investigative Service; Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security; Air Force Office of Special Investigations; FBI; Homeland Security Investigations; and Department of State, Directorate of Defense Trade Controls are investigating the case.

    Assistant U.S. Attorneys Daniel J. Marcet and Lindsey Schmidt for the Middle District of Florida and Trial Attorney Stephen Marzen of the National Security Division’s Counterintelligence and Export Section are prosecuting the case.

    MIL OSI USA News –

    January 25, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: U.S. Reaches Settlement for Over $100M in Civil Lawsuit Against Owner and Operator of the Vessel That Destroyed the Francis Scott Key Bridge

    Source: US State of California

    Settlement Will Cover Federal Costs Incurred to Restore Access to the Port of Baltimore

    The Justice Department announced today that Grace Ocean Private Limited and Synergy Marine Private Limited, the Singaporean corporations that owned and operated the Motor Vessel DALI, have agreed to pay $101,980,000 to resolve a civil claim brought by the United States for costs borne in responding to the catastrophic collapse of the Francis Scott Key Bridge.  

    The settlement resolves the United States’ claims for civil damages for $103,078,056 under the Rivers and Harbors Act, Oil Pollution Act, and general maritime law. The settlement monies will go to the U.S. Treasury and to the budgets of several federal agencies directly affected by the allision or involved in the response.

    “Nearly seven months after one of the worst transportation disasters in recent memory, which claimed six lives and caused untold damage, we have reached an important milestone with today’s settlement,” said Principal Deputy Associate Attorney General Benjamin C. Mizer. “Thanks to the hard work of the Justice Department attorneys since day one of this disaster, we were able to secure this early settlement of our claim, just over one month into litigation. This resolution ensures that the costs of the federal government’s cleanup efforts in the Fort McHenry Channel are borne by Grace Ocean and Synergy and not the American taxpayer.”

    “This is a tremendous outcome that fully compensates the United States for the costs it incurred in responding to this disaster and holds the owner and operator of the DALI accountable,” said Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Brian M. Boynton, head of the Justice Department’s Civil Division. “The prompt resolution of this matter also avoids the expense associated with litigating this complex case for potentially years.”

    In the early morning hours of March 26, the Motor Vessel DALI left the Port of Baltimore bound for Sri Lanka. While navigating through the Fort McHenry Channel, the vessel lost power, regained power, and then lost power again before striking the bridge. The bridge collapsed and plunged into the water below, tragically killing six people. In addition to this heartbreaking loss of life, the wreck of the DALI and the remains of the bridge were left to obstruct the navigable channel, bringing all shipping into and out of the Port of Baltimore to a standstill. The loss of the bridge also severed a critical highway in the transportation infrastructure and blocked a key artery for local commuters.

    The United States led the response efforts of dozens of federal, state, and local agencies to remove about 50,000 tons of steel, concrete, and asphalt from the channel and from the DALI itself. While removal operations were underway, the United States set up temporary channels to start relieving the bottleneck at the port and mitigate some of the economic devastation caused by the DALI. The Fort McHenry Channel was cleared by June 10, and the Port of Baltimore was once again open for commercial navigation.

    On Sept. 18, the Justice Department filed a civil lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland, seeking over $100 million in damages from Grace Ocean and Synergy. The Department’s claim was part of a legal action that the vessel companies filed shortly after the tragedy, in which they seek exoneration or limitation of their liability to approximately $43.7 million. Today’s settlement is in addition to $97,294 recently paid by Grace Ocean  to the Coast Guard National Pollution Fund Center for costs incurred to abate the threat of oil pollution arising from the incident.  

    The settlement does not include any damages for the reconstruction of the Francis Scott Key Bridge. The State of Maryland built, owned, maintained, and operated the bridge, and attorneys on the state’s behalf filed their own claim for those damages. Pursuant to the governing regulation, funds recovered by the State of Maryland for reconstruction of the bridge will be used to reduce the project costs paid for in the first instance by federal tax dollars.

    The resolution of the civil matter was handled by attorneys from the Civil Division’s Aviation, Space & Admiralty Litigation Section and the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Maryland, Baltimore Division.

    MIL OSI USA News –

    January 25, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Security: U.S. Reaches Settlement for Over $100M in Civil Lawsuit Against Owner and Operator of the Vessel That Destroyed the Francis Scott Key Bridge

    Source: United States Attorneys General

    Settlement Will Cover Federal Costs Incurred to Restore Access to the Port of Baltimore

    The Justice Department announced today that Grace Ocean Private Limited and Synergy Marine Private Limited, the Singaporean corporations that owned and operated the Motor Vessel DALI, have agreed to pay $101,980,000 to resolve a civil claim brought by the United States for costs borne in responding to the catastrophic collapse of the Francis Scott Key Bridge.  

    The settlement resolves the United States’ claims for civil damages for $103,078,056 under the Rivers and Harbors Act, Oil Pollution Act, and general maritime law. The settlement monies will go to the U.S. Treasury and to the budgets of several federal agencies directly affected by the allision or involved in the response.

    “Nearly seven months after one of the worst transportation disasters in recent memory, which claimed six lives and caused untold damage, we have reached an important milestone with today’s settlement,” said Principal Deputy Associate Attorney General Benjamin C. Mizer. “Thanks to the hard work of the Justice Department attorneys since day one of this disaster, we were able to secure this early settlement of our claim, just over one month into litigation. This resolution ensures that the costs of the federal government’s cleanup efforts in the Fort McHenry Channel are borne by Grace Ocean and Synergy and not the American taxpayer.”

    “This is a tremendous outcome that fully compensates the United States for the costs it incurred in responding to this disaster and holds the owner and operator of the DALI accountable,” said Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Brian M. Boynton, head of the Justice Department’s Civil Division. “The prompt resolution of this matter also avoids the expense associated with litigating this complex case for potentially years.”

    In the early morning hours of March 26, the Motor Vessel DALI left the Port of Baltimore bound for Sri Lanka. While navigating through the Fort McHenry Channel, the vessel lost power, regained power, and then lost power again before striking the bridge. The bridge collapsed and plunged into the water below, tragically killing six people. In addition to this heartbreaking loss of life, the wreck of the DALI and the remains of the bridge were left to obstruct the navigable channel, bringing all shipping into and out of the Port of Baltimore to a standstill. The loss of the bridge also severed a critical highway in the transportation infrastructure and blocked a key artery for local commuters.

    The United States led the response efforts of dozens of federal, state, and local agencies to remove about 50,000 tons of steel, concrete, and asphalt from the channel and from the DALI itself. While removal operations were underway, the United States set up temporary channels to start relieving the bottleneck at the port and mitigate some of the economic devastation caused by the DALI. The Fort McHenry Channel was cleared by June 10, and the Port of Baltimore was once again open for commercial navigation.

    On Sept. 18, the Justice Department filed a civil lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland, seeking over $100 million in damages from Grace Ocean and Synergy. The Department’s claim was part of a legal action that the vessel companies filed shortly after the tragedy, in which they seek exoneration or limitation of their liability to approximately $43.7 million. Today’s settlement is in addition to $97,294 recently paid by Grace Ocean  to the Coast Guard National Pollution Fund Center for costs incurred to abate the threat of oil pollution arising from the incident.  

    The settlement does not include any damages for the reconstruction of the Francis Scott Key Bridge. The State of Maryland built, owned, maintained, and operated the bridge, and attorneys on the state’s behalf filed their own claim for those damages. Pursuant to the governing regulation, funds recovered by the State of Maryland for reconstruction of the bridge will be used to reduce the project costs paid for in the first instance by federal tax dollars.

    The resolution of the civil matter was handled by attorneys from the Civil Division’s Aviation, Space & Admiralty Litigation Section and the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Maryland, Baltimore Division.

    MIL Security OSI –

    January 25, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: The First of Long Island Corporation Reports Earnings for the Third Quarter of 2024

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    MELVILLE, N.Y., Oct. 24, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — The First of Long Island Corporation (Nasdaq: FLIC, the “Company” or the “Corporation”), the parent of The First National Bank of Long Island (the “Bank”), reported earnings for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2024.

    President and Chief Executive Officer Chris Becker commented on the Company’s results: “We are encouraged by a second consecutive linked quarter showing improvements in key financial metrics. After an increase in the net interest margin of one basis point in the second quarter of 2024 from the first quarter of 2024, the margin increased nine basis points in the third quarter of 2024 when compared to second quarter of 2024. We are optimistic the trend will continue during the fourth quarter of this year. Excluding merger and branch consolidation expenses, our noninterest expense remains well controlled and in line with expectations. Finally, our credit quality results remained strong.”

    Analysis of Earnings – Nine Months Ended September 30, 2024

    Net income and earnings per share (“EPS”) for the nine months ended September 30, 2024, were $13.8 million and $0.61, respectively, as compared to $20.2 million and $0.89, respectively, in the same period of 2023.  Adjusted net income and EPS for the current nine-month period, which exclude merger and branch consolidation expenses, were $14.8 million and $0.66, respectively (see “Non-GAAP Reconciliation” table at the end of this release). The principal drivers of the change in adjusted net income were a decline in net interest income of $11.7 million, or 17.5%, and a provision for credit losses of $740,000 as compared to a provision reversal of $1.2 million in the prior period, partially offset by a loss on sales of securities of $3.5 million in the first quarter of 2023, an increase in remaining noninterest income of $1.4 million, and decreases in noninterest expense of $1.2 million and income tax expense of $2.2 million. The nine months ended 2024 produced a return on average assets (“ROA”) of 0.44%, a return on average equity (“ROE”) of 4.88%, an efficiency ratio of 76.39%, and a net interest margin of 1.83%.  Excluding merger and branch consolidation expenses, adjusted ROA and ROE were 0.47% and 5.23%, respectively, and the adjusted efficiency ratio was 74.21% (see “Non-GAAP Reconciliation” table at the end of this release).

    Net interest income declined when comparing the first nine months of 2024 and 2023 due to an increase in interest expense of $23.4 million that was only partially offset by a $11.7 million increase in interest income. The cost of interest-bearing liabilities increased 109 basis points while the yield on interest-earning assets increased 38 basis points when comparing the nine-month periods.  The Bank’s balance sheet remains liability sensitive, however the pace of repricing of average interest-earning assets began outpacing the repricing of average interest-bearing liabilities in the third quarter.

    The Bank recorded a provision for credit losses of $740,000 for the nine months ended 2024, compared to a provision reversal of $1.2 million in the same period of 2023. The allowance for credit losses declined when compared to year-end 2023 largely due to declines in historical loss rates and reserves on individually evaluated loans, partially offset by a deterioration in current and forecasted economic conditions, including adjustments for rent stabilization status of multifamily properties. The reserve coverage ratio remained stable at 0.88% of total loans at September 30, 2024 as compared to 0.88% at June 30, 2024 and 0.89% at December 31, 2023. Past due loans and nonaccrual loans were at $346,000 and $2.9 million, respectively, on September 30, 2024. Overall credit quality of the loan and investment portfolios remains strong.

    Noninterest income, excluding the loss on sales of securities of $3.5 million in the 2023 period, increased $1.4 million, or 19.1%, when comparing the first nine months of 2024 and 2023. Recurring components of noninterest income including bank-owned life insurance (“BOLI”) and service charges on deposit accounts had increases of 8.0% and 13.4%, respectively. Other noninterest income increased 33.2% and included increases of $469,000 in merchant card services, $232,000 in back-to-back swap fees, and $181,000 in pension income, which were partially offset by a gain on disposition of premises and fixed assets of $240,000 in 2023.

    Noninterest expense increased $254,000, or 0.5%, for the nine months of 2024, as compared to the same period in 2023. Excluding merger and branch consolidation expenses, adjusted noninterest expense decreased by $1.2 million (See “Non-GAAP Reconciliation” table at the end of this release). Reductions in occupancy and equipment expense of $685,000 and telecommunication expense of $383,000 drove the decline in adjusted noninterest expense. The decrease in occupancy and equipment expense was largely due to the ongoing branch optimization strategy, which resulted in the closing of various locations. Telecom expense decreased mainly due to efficiencies associated with system upgrades.

    Income tax expense decreased $2.7 million, and the effective tax rate declined to (0.3)% for the nine months ended 2024 as compared to 11.6% for the same period in prior year. The decline in the effective tax rate is mainly due to an increase in the percentage of pre-tax income derived from the Bank’s real estate investment trust reducing the state and local income tax due. The decrease in income tax expense reflects the lower effective tax rate and a decline in pre-tax income.

    Analysis of Earnings – Third Quarter 2024 Versus Third Quarter 2023

    Net income for the third quarter of 2024 decreased $2.2 million as compared to the third quarter of last year. Adjusted net income for the third quarter decreased by $1.2 million (see “Non-GAAP Reconciliation” table at the end of this release). The change in adjusted net income is mainly attributable to a $2.8 million decline in net interest income for substantially the same reasons discussed above with respect to the nine-month periods along with a $341,000 increase in the provision for credit losses.  Partially offsetting the decreases, was an increase in noninterest income of $966,000 for substantially the same reasons discussed above with respect to the nine-month periods. The quarter produced a ROA of 0.44%, a ROE of 4.77%, an efficiency ratio of 79.09%, and a net interest margin of 1.89%.  On an adjusted basis, ROA and ROE were 0.53% and 5.79%, respectively, and the efficiency ratio was 72.69% (see “Non-GAAP Reconciliation” table at the end of this release).

    Analysis of Earnings –Third Quarter 2024 Versus Second Quarter 2024

    Net income for the third quarter of 2024 decreased $199,000 compared to the second quarter of 2024. Adjusted net income for the third quarter increased by $782,000 (see “Non-GAAP Reconciliation” table at the end of this release). The increase in adjusted net income was partially due to an increase in net interest income of $169,000, a decrease in the provision for credit losses of $400,000, and an increase in back-to-back swap fees of $232,000.  

    Net interest income increased due to an increase in net interest margin. The increase in the net interest margin to 1.89% in the third quarter of 2024 from 1.80% in the second quarter of 2024 was largely due to the repricing of wholesale funding at lower costs largely offsetting the increase in cost of other interest-bearing liabilities while the yield on interest-earning assets continued to rise. Additionally, average interest-bearing deposits decreased $35.8 million and average higher cost borrowings decreased $65.6 million.

    The decrease in income tax expense was substantially due to the same reasons discussed above with respect to the nine-month periods.

    Liquidity

    Total average deposits declined by $89.6 million, or 2.6%, when comparing the nine-month periods of 2024 and 2023. On September 30, 2024, overnight advances and other borrowings were down by $70.0 million and $27.5 million, respectively, from year-end 2023. The Bank had $582.8 million in collateralized borrowing lines with the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York and the Federal Reserve Bank, as well as a $20 million unsecured line of credit with a correspondent bank. We also had $312.9 million in unencumbered cash and securities. In total, we had approximately $915.7 million of available liquidity on September 30, 2024.  At September 30, 2024, uninsured deposits were 45.9% of total deposits. 

    Capital

    The Corporation’s capital position remains strong with a leverage ratio of approximately 10.13% on September 30, 2024.  Book value per share was $17.25 on September 30, 2024, versus $16.83 on December 31, 2023. The accumulated other comprehensive loss component of stockholders’ equity is mainly comprised of a net unrealized loss in the available-for-sale securities portfolio due to higher market interest rates. The Company declared its quarterly cash dividend of $0.21 per share during the quarter. There were no share repurchases during the quarter. The Board and management continue to evaluate the quarterly dividend to provide the best opportunity to maximize shareholder value.

    Forward Looking Information

    This earnings release contains various “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of that term as set forth in Rule 175 of the Securities Act of 1933 and Rule 3b-6 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Such statements are generally contained in sentences including the words “may” or “expect” or “could” or “should” or “would” or “believe” or “anticipate”. The Corporation cautions that these forward-looking statements are subject to numerous assumptions, risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contemplated by the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause future results to vary from current management expectations include, but are not limited to, changing economic conditions; legislative and regulatory changes; monetary and fiscal policies of the federal government; changes in interest rates; deposit flows and the cost of funds; demand for loan products; competition; changes in management’s business strategies; changes in accounting principles, policies or guidelines; changes in real estate values; and other factors discussed in the “risk factors” section of the Corporation’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The forward-looking statements are made as of the date of this press release, and the Corporation assumes no obligation to update the forward-looking statements or to update the reasons why actual results could differ from those projected in the forward-looking statements.

    For more detailed financial information please see the Corporation’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2024. The Form 10-Q will be available through the Bank’s website at www.fnbli.com on or about October 28, 2024, when it is anticipated to be electronically filed with the SEC. Our SEC filings are also available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.

               
    CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
    (Unaudited)
               
      9/30/2024     12/31/2023  
      (dollars in thousands)  
    Assets:              
    Cash and cash equivalents $ 78,568     $ 60,887  
    Investment securities available-for-sale, at fair value   659,696       695,877  
                   
    Loans:              
    Commercial and industrial   146,440       116,163  
    Secured by real estate:              
    Commercial mortgages   1,950,008       1,919,714  
    Residential mortgages   1,103,937       1,166,887  
    Home equity lines   36,962       44,070  
    Consumer and other   1,150       1,230  
        3,238,497       3,248,064  
    Allowance for credit losses   (28,647 )     (28,992 )
        3,209,850       3,219,072  
                   
    Restricted stock, at cost   28,191       32,659  
    Bank premises and equipment, net   30,180       31,414  
    Right-of-use asset – operating leases   20,359       22,588  
    Bank-owned life insurance   116,192       114,045  
    Pension plan assets, net   10,421       10,740  
    Deferred income tax benefit   27,779       28,996  
    Other assets   20,243       19,622  
      $ 4,201,479     $ 4,235,900  
    Liabilities:              
    Deposits:              
    Checking $ 1,121,871     $ 1,133,184  
    Savings, NOW and money market   1,594,317       1,546,369  
    Time   610,876       591,433  
        3,327,064       3,270,986  
                   
    Overnight advances   —       70,000  
    Other borrowings   445,000       472,500  
    Operating lease liability   22,876       24,940  
    Accrued expenses and other liabilities   17,958       17,328  
        3,812,898       3,855,754  
    Stockholders’ Equity:              
    Common stock, par value $0.10 per share:              
    Authorized, 80,000,000 shares;              
    Issued and outstanding, 22,532,080 and 22,590,942 shares   2,253       2,259  
    Surplus   79,157       79,728  
    Retained earnings   355,541       355,887  
        436,951       437,874  
    Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax   (48,370 )     (57,728 )
        388,581       380,146  
      $ 4,201,479     $ 4,235,900  
                   
                   
    CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
    (Unaudited)
               
      Nine Months Ended     Three Months Ended  
      9/30/2024     9/30/2023     9/30/2024     9/30/2023  
      (dollars in thousands)  
    Interest and dividend income:                              
    Loans $ 102,679     $ 94,706     $ 35,026     $ 32,818  
    Investment securities:                              
    Taxable   20,701       15,877       6,229       6,594  
    Nontaxable   2,872       3,976       955       1,004  
        126,252       114,559       42,210       40,416  
    Interest expense:                              
    Savings, NOW and money market deposits   33,637       22,188       12,117       8,802  
    Time deposits   20,748       13,086       6,712       5,785  
    Overnight advances   392       596       125       50  
    Other borrowings   16,283       11,782       4,656       4,347  
        71,060       47,652       23,610       18,984  
    Net interest income   55,192       66,907       18,600       21,432  
    Provision (credit) for credit losses   740       (1,227 )     170       (171 )
    Net interest income after provision (credit) for credit losses   54,452       68,134       18,430       21,603  
                                   
    Noninterest income:                              
    Bank-owned life insurance   2,573       2,383       876       809  
    Service charges on deposit accounts   2,543       2,243       842       703  
    Net loss on sales of securities   —       (3,489 )     —       —  
    Other   3,732       2,802       1,492       732  
        8,848       3,939       3,210       2,244  
    Noninterest expense:                              
    Salaries and employee benefits   29,169       29,268       9,695       9,649  
    Occupancy and equipment   9,289       9,974       2,965       3,253  
    Merger expenses   866       —       866       —  
    Branch consolidation expenses   547       —       547       —  
    Other   9,635       10,010       3,378       3,262  
        49,506       49,252       17,451       16,164  
    Income before income taxes   13,794       22,821       4,189       7,683  
    Income tax (credit) expense   (38 )     2,641       (410 )     883  
    Net income $ 13,832     $ 20,180     $ 4,599     $ 6,800  
                                   
    Share and Per Share Data:                              
    Weighted Average Common Shares   22,520,026       22,538,520       22,529,051       22,569,716  
    Dilutive restricted stock units   87,716       69,010       138,272       86,914  
    Dilutive weighted average common shares   22,607,742       22,607,530       22,667,323       22,656,630  
                                   
    Basic EPS $ 0.61     $ 0.90     $ 0.20     $ 0.30  
    Diluted EPS   0.61       0.89       0.20       0.30  
    Cash Dividends Declared per share   0.63       0.63       0.21       0.21  
                                   
    FINANCIAL RATIOS  
    (Unaudited)  
    ROA   0.44 %     0.64 %     0.44 %     0.63 %
    ROE   4.88       7.29       4.77       7.34  
    Net Interest Margin   1.83       2.21       1.89       2.13  
    Dividend Payout Ratio   103.28       70.79       105.00       70.00  
    Efficiency Ratio   76.39       65.33       79.09       67.51  
                                   
                                   
    PROBLEM AND POTENTIAL PROBLEM LOANS AND ASSETS
    (Unaudited)
               
      9/30/2024     12/31/2023  
      (dollars in thousands)  
    Loans including modifications to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty:              
    Modified and performing according to their modified terms $ 424     $ 431  
    Past due 30 through 89 days   346       3,086  
    Past due 90 days or more and still accruing   —       —  
    Nonaccrual   2,899       1,053  
        3,669       4,570  
    Other real estate owned   —       —  
      $ 3,669     $ 4,570  
                   
    Allowance for credit losses $ 28,647     $ 28,992  
    Allowance for credit losses as a percentage of total loans   0.88 %     0.89 %
    Allowance for credit losses as a multiple of nonaccrual loans   9.9 x     27.5 x
                   
                   
    AVERAGE BALANCE SHEET, INTEREST RATES AND INTEREST DIFFERENTIAL
    (Unaudited)
           
        Nine Months Ended September 30,  
        2024     2023  
        Average     Interest/     Average     Average     Interest/     Average  
    (dollars in thousands)   Balance     Dividends     Rate     Balance     Dividends     Rate  
    Assets:                                                
    Interest-earning bank balances   $ 66,593     $ 2,724       5.46 %   $ 52,163     $ 1,969       5.05 %
    Investment securities:                                                
    Taxable (1)     620,721       17,977       3.86       564,857       13,908       3.28  
    Nontaxable (1) (2)     152,758       3,636       3.17       209,566       5,033       3.20  
    Loans (1) (2)     3,236,794       102,679       4.23       3,266,184       94,708       3.87  
    Total interest-earning assets     4,076,866       127,016       4.15       4,092,770       115,618       3.77  
    Allowance for credit losses     (28,590 )                     (30,531 )                
    Net interest-earning assets     4,048,276                       4,062,239                  
    Cash and due from banks     32,844                       31,410                  
    Premises and equipment, net     30,979                       32,107                  
    Other assets     122,671                       115,167                  
        $ 4,234,770                     $ 4,240,923                  
    Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity:                                                
    Savings, NOW & money market deposits   $ 1,589,154       33,637       2.83     $ 1,668,506       22,188       1.78  
    Time deposits     625,553       20,748       4.43       536,529       13,086       3.26  
    Total interest-bearing deposits     2,214,707       54,385       3.28       2,205,035       35,274       2.14  
    Overnight advances     9,303       392       5.63       14,993       596       5.31  
    Other borrowings     457,053       16,283       4.76       377,053       11,782       4.18  
    Total interest-bearing liabilities     2,681,063       71,060       3.54       2,597,081       47,652       2.45  
    Checking deposits     1,136,738                       1,236,001                  
    Other liabilities     38,354                       37,736                  
          3,856,155                       3,870,818                  
    Stockholders’ equity     378,615                       370,105                  
        $ 4,234,770                     $ 4,240,923                  
                                                     
    Net interest income (2)           $ 55,956                     $ 67,966          
    Net interest spread (2)                     0.61 %                     1.32 %
    Net interest margin (2)                     1.83 %                     2.21 %
                                                     
    (1) The average balances of loans include nonaccrual loans. The average balances of investment securities exclude unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities.
    (2) Tax-equivalent basis. Interest income on a tax-equivalent basis includes the additional amount of interest income that would have been earned if the Corporation’s investment in tax-exempt loans and investment securities had been made in loans and investment securities subject to federal income taxes yielding the same after-tax income. The tax-equivalent amount of $1.00 of nontaxable income was $1.27 for each period presented using the statutory federal income tax rate of 21%.
       
    AVERAGE BALANCE SHEET, INTEREST RATES AND INTEREST DIFFERENTIAL
    (Unaudited)
           
        Three Months Ended September 30,  
        2024     2023  
        Average     Interest/     Average     Average     Interest/     Average  
    (dollars in thousands)   Balance     Dividends     Rate     Balance     Dividends     Rate  
    Assets:                                                
    Interest-earning bank balances   $ 33,463     $ 453       5.39 %   $ 66,474     $ 902       5.38 %
    Investment securities:                                                
    Taxable (1)     602,446       5,776       3.84       625,827       5,692       3.64  
    Nontaxable (1) (2)     152,278       1,209       3.18       161,423       1,271       3.15  
    Loans (1)     3,237,138       35,026       4.33       3,257,256       32,818       4.03  
    Total interest-earning assets     4,025,325       42,464       4.22       4,110,980       40,683       3.96  
    Allowance for credit losses     (28,495 )                     (29,981 )                
    Net interest-earning assets     3,996,830                       4,080,999                  
    Cash and due from banks     33,028                       33,420                  
    Premises and equipment, net     30,754                       32,268                  
    Other assets     126,428                       113,084                  
        $ 4,187,040                     $ 4,259,771                  
    Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity:                                                
    Savings, NOW & money market deposits   $ 1,614,294       12,117       2.99     $ 1,655,032       8,802       2.11  
    Time deposits     600,873       6,712       4.44       587,814       5,785       3.90  
    Total interest-bearing deposits     2,215,167       18,829       3.38       2,242,846       14,587       2.58  
    Overnight advances     8,793       125       5.66       3,478       50       5.70  
    Other borrowings     396,739       4,656       4.67       382,500       4,347       4.51  
    Total interest-bearing liabilities     2,620,699       23,610       3.58       2,628,824       18,984       2.87  
    Checking deposits     1,146,274                       1,225,052                  
    Other liabilities     36,805                       38,123                  
          3,803,778                       3,891,999                  
    Stockholders’ equity     383,262                       367,772                  
        $ 4,187,040                     $ 4,259,771                  
                                                     
    Net interest income (2)           $ 18,854                     $ 21,699          
    Net interest spread (2)                     0.64 %                     1.09 %
    Net interest margin (2)                     1.89 %                     2.13 %
                                                     
    (1) The average balances of loans include nonaccrual loans. The average balances of investment securities exclude unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities.
    (2) Tax-equivalent basis. Interest income on a tax-equivalent basis includes the additional amount of interest income that would have been earned if the Corporation’s investment in tax-exempt investment securities had been made in investment securities subject to federal income taxes yielding the same after-tax income. The tax-equivalent amount of $1.00 of nontaxable income was $1.27 for each period presented using the statutory federal income tax rate of 21%.
       

    NON-GAAP RECONCILIATION
    (Unaudited)

    The following tables provide supplemental non-GAAP financial measures which management uses internally to help understand, manage, and evaluate our business performance and to help make operating decisions. These supplemental financial measures are not measurements of financial performance under generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”) and, as a result may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies. The Corporation believes that these non-GAAP financial measures are useful to investors and analysts in comparing our performance across reporting periods on a consistent basis. The Corporation also believes the use of these non-GAAP financial measures can facilitate comparison of our operating results to those of our competitors. The following non-GAAP financial measures exclude merger related and branch consolidation expenses:  

               
      Nine Months Ended     Three Months Ended  
      9/30/2024     9/30/2023     9/30/2024     9/30/2023  
      (dollars in thousands, except per share data)  
    Reconciliation of adjusted net income:                              
    Net income $ 13,832     $ 20,180     $ 4,599     $ 6,800  
    Adjustments to net income:                              
    Merger expenses   866       —       866       —  
    Branch consolidation expenses   547       —       547       —  
    Income tax effect of adjustments (1)   (432 )     —       (432 )     —  
    Adjusted net income $ 14,813     $ 20,180     $ 5,580     $ 6,800  
                                   
    Diluted EPS                              
    Net income $ 13,832     $ 20,180     $ 4,599     $ 6,800  
    Adjusted net income   14,813       20,180       5,580       6,800  
                                   
    Dilutive weighted average common shares   22,607,742       22,607,530       22,667,323       22,656,630  
                                   
    Diluted EPS $ 0.61     $ 0.89     $ 0.20     $ 0.30  
    Adjusted Diluted EPS   0.66       0.89       0.25       0.30  
                                   
    ROA and ROE                              
    Net income $ 13,832     $ 20,180     $ 4,599     $ 6,800  
    Adjusted net income   14,813       20,180       5,580       6,800  
                                   
    Average Total Assets $ 4,234,770     $ 4,240,923     $ 4,187,040     $ 4,259,771  
    Average Total Equity   378,615       370,105       383,262       367,772  
                                   
    ROA   0.44 %     0.64 %     0.44 %     0.63 %
    Adjusted ROA   0.47       0.64       0.53       0.63  
                                   
    ROE   4.88 %     7.29 %     4.77 %     7.34 %
    Adjusted ROE   5.23       7.29       5.79       7.34  
                                   
    Efficiency Ratio                              
    Noninterest expense $ 49,506     $ 49,252     $ 17,451     $ 16,164  
    Adjustments to noninterest expense:                              
    Merger expenses   (866 )     —       (866 )     —  
    Branch consolidation expenses   (547 )     —       (547 )     —  
    Adjusted noninterest expense $ 48,093     $ 49,252     $ 16,038     $ 16,164  
                                   
    Net interest income $ 55,956       67,966       18,854       21,699  
    Noninterest income   8,848       3,939       3,210       2,244  
    Total revenue $ 64,804     $ 71,905     $ 22,064     $ 23,943  
                                   
    Efficiency Ratio   76.39 %     65.33 %     79.09 %     67.51 %
    Adjusted Efficiency Ratio   74.21       65.33       72.69       67.51  
                                   

    (1) Adjustments to net income are taxed at the Corporation’s approximate statutory rate. 

    For More Information Contact:
    Janet Verneuille, SEVP and CFO
    (516) 671-4900, Ext. 7462

    The MIL Network –

    January 25, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Sorensen Returns Over $3.2 Million to Illinois Neighbors

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Eric Sorensen (IL-17)

    ROCK ISLAND, IL – Congressman Eric Sorensen (IL-17) is announcing that his office has returned more than $3.2 million to his neighbors through federal casework services since he was sworn into Congress. 

    “My number one job as the representative for Central and Northwestern Illinois in Congress is to make sure the federal government is working on behalf of my neighbors,” said Sorensen. “I know how stressful it can be when you need help from the government and all you get is the runaround. That is where I can step in to get you the help you need. I am proud of the work we have done to put more than $3.2 million of my neighbor’s hard-earned cash back in their pockets. If you need any help dealing with a federal agency, know that I have your back.” 

    The more than $3,263,230 secured for his neighbors across Central and Northwestern Illinois comes as a result of Sorensen and his staff’s work to help constituents get the refunds and benefits they are owed from federal agencies, which include overdue tax returns and delayed Social Security, veterans, and worker’s compensation benefits.  

    Residents of Illinois’ 17th Congressional District who need help with a federal agency are encouraged to contact Sorensen’s office at (309) 786-3406 or fill out a casework request form on Sorensen’s official website. All submissions are reviewed by a member of Sorensen’s staff. 

    The following stories are from constituents that Sorensen’s office has helped: 

    Daniel from Peoria Heights reached out to get help with VA benefits: “I was having trouble having my VA benefits reinstated after they were mistakenly revoked after contacting Representative Sorensen’s office Hillary handle my case and my benefits were reinstated, and I had a check within 30 days.” 

    Holly from Morrison needed help getting issues resolved between her and the IRS: “I reached out in hopes to get help with repeated problems I have been having with the IRS. They were able to reach out on my behalf and figure the issue out. Within a very short timeframe my issues were all resolved.” 

    Deb from Freeport needed to get her families passports renewed quickly and called Sorensen’s office for help: “Staff helped us with the issue we were having trying to renew our passports. If she would not have kept pushing for a resolution, we would not have received them, as the only response we could get was the passport processing center lost them. We are so thankful for their continued excellent fast assistance to our needs.” 

    Katie from Monmouth lost her job and needed help getting her past wages: “Ever since I lost my job at WCCS Head Start, I have had help with gaining information on how to get my past wages that are due. Eric Sorensen’s office has helped me gain information about my situation and ways to improve the outcome.” 

    Bob from Peoria needed help getting Medicare Part B coverage: “I was having difficulty trying to get my Medicare Part B to begin on September 1st, 2023, with our local office of the Social Security Administration. After many failed attempts to get a certain individual to return my calls, as well as several conversations with the Chicago and Maryland offices with no results, I contacted your office. I spoke with staff in your office about my difficulties with this matter on August 31st, 2023, and within three days, our local office received a letter or document from your office, and they got me signed up for Part B on September 15th, 2023, to be effective on September 1st, 2023. Staff were caring and showed extraordinary expedience in helping me get this issue resolved.” 

    Melissa from Rock Island reached out to get help with a refugee family: “Staff assisted me in the process of rescheduling USCIS appointments for a refugee family in Moline. Her assistance has allowed a constituent and her family the opportunity to continue the immigration process more easily. Staff has been friendly, supportive, and knowledgeable every step of the process. We are so grateful for her help.” 

    Congressman Eric Sorensen serves on the House Committee on Agriculture and the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology. Prior to serving in Congress, Sorensen was a local meteorologist in Rockford and the Quad Cities for nearly 20 years. His district includes Illinois’ Quad Cities, Rockford, Peoria, and Bloomington-Normal.

    ###

    MIL OSI USA News –

    January 25, 2025
  • MIL-Evening Report: Stoneflies change colour in response to deforestation, suggesting humans can alter evolution – new research

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Jonathan Waters, Professor of Zoology, University of Otago

    Author provided, CC BY-SA

    As we continue to change the planet, scientists are worried we might also be altering the evolutionary trajectories of the species that live alongside us, perhaps even including some irreversible shifts.

    Certainly, the evidence for change is everywhere. As the planet warms, species’ ranges are shifting and their life cycles are changing. As we harvest the largest fish in the ocean, the species affected are now maturing at smaller sizes.

    But are these shifts we observe in wild populations underpinned by genetic changes (mutations in the DNA) or are they simply flexible responses to environmental change? If the changes are genetic, how are they happening?

    So far, researchers have observed fewer clear-cut examples of human-induced evolution in the wild than one might imagine. But our new study may provide a new “textbook” case of human-driven evolution in wild insects.

    Our findings are centred on an intriguing case of “mimicry” from New Zealand, in which a harmless insect has evolved to mimic the warning colours of a highly toxic species.

    Forest removal drives colour shift

    Convincingly demonstrating “evolution in action” involves finding the agents of natural selection (environmental factors driving the change) and discovering the genetic mechanism.

    Until now, the peppered moth was the “classic” example of human-driven evolution. Dark-coloured specimens of the moth suddenly appeared during the 19th century. It was a likely response to industrial pollution which meant light-coloured individuals were no longer blending in to the increasingly sooty British environment. Despite its broad appeal, some aspects of even this famous case have been criticised as unclear and anecdotal.

    We worked on stoneflies and the impact of deforestation.

    The black stonefly Austroperla lives in forests. It produces cyanide to deter potential predators, and to advertise its toxicity this species has high-contrast black, white and yellow markings, reminiscent of wasp colouration.

    The non-toxic Zelandoperla stonefly has evolved astonishingly similar warning colouration, apparently to trick predators (forest birds) into assuming that it, too, is toxic. The intricate and unique ecological interactions between these insects and their predators have apparently evolved together over millions of years.

    Dark coloured Zelandoperla stoneflies (middle) mimic the poisonous Austroperla (top), which are abundant in forests. Recent forest clearance has eliminated Austroperla from many regions of New Zealand. In response, Zelandoperla populations have quickly evolved lighter colouration (bottom).
    Graham McCulloch, Jon Waters, CC BY-SA

    Where do humans come into this story? Aotearoa New Zealand was the last major landmass to be colonised by people. In many places the human impacts on its ecosystems have been devastating.

    In addition to species extinctions, New Zealand has lost much of its original native forest cover in just a few centuries. This deforestation has wiped out countless populations of forest birds, along with the poisonous, forest-dependent Austroperla.

    Our study reveals this widespread deforestation has also proven a game changer for the stonefly “mimic”. As its predators and the poisonous species it mimics have vanished from many regions, there is no longer much point in displaying warning colouration.

    In an astonishing about-turn, Zelandoperla populations from deforested habitats have quickly lost their spectacular “mimic” colouration. It turns out that the production of this intricate colouration was costly, and when no longer essential, evolution rapidly removed it – in a case of “use it or lose it”.

    Human-driven deforestation in New Zealand has altered species interactions in a mimicry system, leading to rapid evolution of insect colour.
    Graham McCulloch, Jon Waters, CC BY-SA

    Genetic change

    In our study, we compared insect populations across several parts of the South Island. We found a remarkably consistent picture. The removal of forest has driven similar colour shifts across different deforested regions.

    The finding that evolutionary change can be “predictable” offers hope that scientists can use evolutionary theory to predict future biodiversity shifts.

    Stonefly models helped to reveal the role of birds.
    Author provided, CC BY-SA

    How do we know birds have played a key role in this rapid colour change? By placing stonefly models of different colours in a variety of habitats, we were able to demonstrate that birds only avoid attacking stoneflies with the “warning” colouration when they are in forests.

    Another challenge was to show that this colour change represents evolution at the DNA level rather than a flexible response to environmental change. We looked at genetic variation across the Zelandoperla genome and found that just a single gene – ebony – is almost completely responsible for this colour evolution.

    Our study also reveals the pace of evolutionary change. By comparing regions deforested soon after human arrival (for example Central Otago, which was deforested around 600 to 700 years ago) with those cleared much more recently (Otago Peninsula, 150 years ago), we show that evolution has proceeded steadily yet inexorably over this human timeframe.

    On the positive side, the finding that at least some of our native species can adapt in the face of rapid environmental change suggests ongoing resilience of our native biodiversity. However, our results also highlight how quickly the intricate interactions that have evolved among native species over millennia can be lost from disturbed ecosystems.

    These new findings raise tantalising questions about the potential to reverse the negative impacts of deforestation on our native biodiversity. In particular, our increasing focus on reforestation and ecological restoration provides hope for restoring the complex ecosystems we have inherited.

    Jonathan Waters receives funding from the RSNZ Marsden Fund.

    Graham McCulloch receives funding from the RSNZ Marsden Fund

    – ref. Stoneflies change colour in response to deforestation, suggesting humans can alter evolution – new research – https://theconversation.com/stoneflies-change-colour-in-response-to-deforestation-suggesting-humans-can-alter-evolution-new-research-242008

    MIL OSI Analysis – EveningReport.nz –

    January 25, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Canada: Speaking notes for the Honourable Marc Miller, Minister of Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship: Government of Canada reduces immigration

    Source: Government of Canada News

    Speech

    Immigration is essential for our country’s economy and accounts for almost 100% of Canada’s labour force growth. In response to the global pandemic and labour shortages, we brought in temporary measures to attract some of the world’s best and brightest to study and work in Canada, which supported the urgent needs of businesses.

    Check against delivery. This speech has been translated in accordance with the Government of Canada’s official languages policy and edited for posting and distribution in accordance with its communications policy.

    Speech was delivered on October 24, 2024 in Ottawa, Ontario.

    Bonjour tout le monde. Good morning. Thank you for being here today.

    I’ll begin by acknowledging that we are gathering on the traditional and unceded territory of the Algonquin Anishinaabeg People.

    I’d like to acknowledge the Prime Minister, and my colleagues for being here today.

    Immigration is essential for our country’s economy and accounts for almost 100% of Canada’s labour force growth. In response to the global pandemic and labour shortages, we brought in temporary measures to attract some of the world’s best and brightest to study and work in Canada, which supported the urgent needs of businesses.

    The plan worked by helping our economy navigate a challenging period and recover more quickly.

    Since then, our economy and the world have changed. While we see signs of improvement, families and communities across the country continue to face challenges.

    The pressures on housing and social services require a more sustainable approach to welcoming newcomers. It is also clear that Canadians want the federal government to better manage the immigration system.

    For the first time, the Immigration Levels Plan includes targets for temporary residents, such as international students and temporary foreign workers, as well as for permanent residents. This more comprehensive approach to welcoming newcomers will help preserve the integrity of our immigration system, respond to the needs and challenges of communities, and set up newcomers for success by having adequate resources to support them.

    Temporary Resident Programs

    Over the last two years, 60% of all newcomers were temporary residents, including international students, temporary workers, and some arriving through humanitarian programs.

    This fast growth resulted in Canadians and newcomers facing challenges and integrity issues that we have already begun to address.

    Today’s plan fulfills the commitment I made earlier this year: to reduce volumes of temporary residents coming and staying in Canada.

    This brings temporary resident planning in line with permanent resident programs, providing greater predictability and transparency to our immigration system.

    For international students, we worked with partners to

    • implement a cap on international students
    • tighten controls on study permits, including the requirement for provincial attestation letters
    • limit access to work permits for graduates – including private-public partnerships that were driving up program admissions

    The changes have worked: in the first nine months of the year, we had fewer international students coming to Canada – down 43% compared to 2023. The result is that local communities face lower rental prices in parts of the country that saw large numbers of students in recent years, and international students are receiving better services and support. For example, in Vancouver, one- and two-bedroom apartment rental prices are down more than 10%, and Toronto over 8%.

    With my colleague, Minister Boissonnault, the government ended temporary pandemic measures regarding the Temporary Foreign Worker Program by bringing in restrictions and controls to limit access for companies employing low-wage workers.

    These changes will help our partners, including provinces, territories and municipalities, align their capacities and allow populations to grow at a more sustainable pace as we encourage institutions to do their part in better welcoming newcomers.

    Our plan reaffirms the government’s commitment to reduce non‑permanent resident volumes to 5% of Canada’s population by the end of 2026.

    With these reduction measures, Canada’s temporary population will decrease over the next few years as significantly more temporary residents will transition to permanent residents or leave Canada compared to new ones arriving. Specifically, compared to each previous year, we will see Canada’s temporary population decline by

    • 445,901 in 2025
    • 445,662 in 2026
    • a modest increase of 17,439 in 2027

    Our actions to-date and levels plan for 2025 will mean that the number of newcomers will decrease over the next few years because significantly more temporary residents will leave Canada compared to those new arrivals.

    Permanent Resident Programs

    It’s clear that our country still needs newcomers to help grow our economy, fill skills and labour gaps, and address challenges like building new homes and providing quality health care.

    With our aging population and people living longer, we need more workers to support important social programs like health care, public pensions and infrastructure.

    But we see the pressures facing our country and are adapting our policies so that Canadians and newcomers alike have access to the quality jobs, homes, and support they need to thrive.

    We have listened to Canadians. That is why we are adjusting the plan and reducing our permanent resident targets. The plan focuses on attracting skilled workers, helping reunite families, and resettling refugees.

    Canada will reduce its permanent immigration targets to align with our economic needs

    • from 500,000 down to 395,000 in 2025;
    • from 500,000 to 380,000 in 2026; and
    • setting a target of 365,000 in 2027.

    These lower permanent resident targets are expected to reduce the housing supply gap by about 670,000 units by the end of 2027.

    We will prioritize permanent resident spots for temporary residents like international students or temporary workers who are already in Canada, by facilitating their transition.

    This means over 40% of permanent residents will come from temporary residents that are already in Canada. These skilled, educated newcomers can continue to support the workforce and economy, without placing additional demands on our social services. Newcomers with experience in Canada show greater long-term success.

    Adjustments will be made to our economic immigration streams to prioritize the transition of workers already here to permanent residence and to be responsive to labour market needs – our In‑Canada Focus. We will put emphasis on our federal economic priorities in programs including provincial nominee programs, the Canadian Experience Class, and regional immigration programs to attract the workers we need such as those in health care and trades occupations.

    Canadians are proud of our country’s reputation as a leader in refugee resettlement. While our refugee resettlement targets are reduced as a result of overall reductions, our commitment to some of the world’s most vulnerable people remains.

    We also understand the importance of reuniting families and loved ones, including spouses, children, parents, and grandparents. That’s why we are continuing to allocate almost 24% of our overall permanent resident admissions to family immigration in 2025.

    And we continue to strengthen Francophone communities outside Quebec. We will target nearly 30,000 French-speaking newcomers in 2025, representing over 8.5% of total admissions, rising to 9.5% in 2026, and 10% of newcomers in 2027.

    This means that despite the decrease in overall PR targets, the number of Francophone newcomers that we hope to settle outside Quebec will continue to increase year over year. This will help support our plan to restore the demographic weight of Francophone communities outside of Quebec.

    Regularization

    Regarding undocumented individuals in Canada, we have been clear that a broad program would not be pursued. However, we will set a small number of admissions for individuals that would be regularized through an initiative focused on those that worked in essential service industries.

    Conclusion

    I want Canadians to know we are listening. We’re aware of our country’s current challenges and are stepping up to address Canada’s evolving needs.

    Our immigration plan will support our economy while responding to the pressures that families and communities are facing today.

    Canada’s immigration plan for the next three years will pause our population growth in the short term to maintain well‑managed and sustainable growth for the long term.

    Our changes over the last year are working. Today’s plan will build on our support for communities and employers while upholding our humanitarian commitments and Canadian values.

    We will pause growth from immigration for two years. It will allow us to get back on pre-pandemic population growth trajectory by 2027 so that over the long term we can continue to grow our economic and social prosperity through immigration.

    We are making immigration work and leveraging our existing programs so that everyone has access to the quality jobs, homes, and supports they need. We are supporting newcomers’ integration and giving them a fair shot in Canada.

    Thank you.

    MIL OSI Canada News –

    January 25, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Australia: 1206 2CC Breakfast with Stephen Cenatiempo

    Source: Australia Government Ministerial Statements

    STEPHEN CENATIEMPO: All right. I want to talk federal politics a little bit further. We’re joined by Kristy McBain, the Minister for Regional Development, Territories and Local Government and the Member for Eden-Monaro. Kristy, good morning. 

    KRISTY MCBAIN: Good morning Stephen. 

    CENATIEMPO: Now I’m going to leave you out of the energy debate for the moment because it’s not your portfolio, but something in the time that you and I have been talking, you’ve been very critical of the previous government and what the current government likes to call rorts, whether it’s sports rorts, car park rorts, all of this. Well, it now turns out you guys are just as bad because the Housing Support Program is pouring money into Labor electorates and marginal electorates that you’re trying to pick up. Pot calling the kettle black, much? 

    MCBAIN: Our Housing Support Program Stream One has been announced, which is for a range of assistance to councils to help them with planning. Stream Two is not yet announced, which is the enabling infrastructure that will help build the water and sewer connections, the roads, kerbs and guttering to get more housing underway. It’s really important that enabling infrastructure is taken off councils that may have to do it themselves if they own the land. Developers are saying, if we did all of that, the blocks become too expensive and nothing will get built. We’re contributing in a number of ways to make sure that housing is more affordable for Australians out there, whether it’s through enabling infrastructure, whether it’s through the Housing Australia Future Fund.

    CENATIEMPO: Kristy, that’s not the argument here. The argument is that it’s going into like key Labor electorates, and Coalition seats that you’re targeting, exactly like car park and sports rorts. 

    MCBAIN: I haven’t seen any of those reports. The decisions have been made by the department, not by Ministers. It is important that we deal with what’s in front of us, and that’s transparency. If it’s been made by the department, it’s been made by the department. We’ve gone through round one of the Growing Regions Fund, which was audited in real time. Those projects were found to stack up to the guidelines. They were across a range of electorates. We’ve been walking the talk and saying, this is what we’re going to be, as transparent as possible as the decisions are made by the department. That’s what they are.

    CENATIEMPO: Except for the Housing Support Fund. All right, let’s talk housing while we’re at it. You’ve hit out a Bridget McKenzie for saying the Commonwealth shouldn’t fund housing. Well, the reality is, the Commonwealth’s not going to fund housing. You’re funding around the edges, which is exactly what the Opposition is saying we should do with their $5 billion package. 

    MCBAIN: What I found quite extraordinary about Bridget McKenzie’s comments was that she said we shouldn’t fund housing in regional areas. That we need to get out of the way and let developers get on with the job. If Bridget paid any attention to the debate that was happening in the Senate, she would know that’s exactly what we’re doing. The Commonwealth Government doesn’t have a construction arm. What we’re doing is making sure we make it easier for people to get on with developments. They say imitation is the best form of flattery. It’s nice to see the Coalition get on now and say we’re actually going to contribute to the housing debate and copy our Housing Support Program.

    CENATIEMPO: Well, it’s not copying. Let’s be fair dinkum about it, it’s not copying.

    MCBAIN: It is. It’s funding enabling infrastructure, which is exactly what we’re doing. I think that’s fantastic. It’s really important that we’ve got major parties interested in housing, and that’s a big change from the ten years that they were in government. What we would like them to do is not only talk with us about enabling infrastructure, but also talk with us about the Help to Buy program, or the Build to Rent program. We know we need to start helping in all different facets of home ownership, whether that’s renting, whether that’s buying, whether that’s trying to enable more blocks to get out on the market. It’s really important that we’re making a difference. The three levels of government need to be working together on this. That’s been the change over the last couple of years. There is a real focus now on housing from three levels of government. 

    CENATIEMPO: Now, I don’t think we’ve seen any results of that yet. Let’s talk about things closer to home in Bungendore. A flood mitigation program. Tell us about this?

    MCBAIN: Right across the country we saw some catastrophic flooding in 2022. We provided $40 million towards the New South Wales Flood Recovery and Resilience Grant program. Under round two of this, more than $4.6 million is being invested across New South Wales, to deal with flood mitigation projects. $2.2 million is going to Queanbeyan-Palerang Regional Council to construct an overflow channel over Turallo Creek in Bungendore. It will allow the flood waters to bypass Tarago Road bridge instead of crossing that and flooding it, during times of heavy rain. I’m really proud to be able to deliver this, because the community has long called for this. We know we need to do more in making our communities more resilient come those heavy weather events. This is just another way that we’re helping New South Wales deliver those resilient programs. It builds on last year’s allocation of over $20 million, which went to 19 projects across New South Wales. Really proud that the community is finally getting a long called for a piece of infrastructure, that will allow them to still cross the road during heavy weather. 

    CENATIEMPO: Now local communities are going to be asked to help identify potential locations for the next round of the Mobile Black Spots Program. Why do we need to do this? Why aren’t local Members already aware of where their black spots are? 

    MCBAIN: We do this all the time with communities. Councils call for community input for black spots all the time, and are constantly updating the telcos with these. I ran a survey last time, which identified a range of different black spots, and we contribute to it as well as community members. It’s really important, particularly as we see the development of more housing blocks, that we make sure that connectivity is still front of mind, particularly when we’re developing more rural areas. It is really important that we continue to update that as we head towards round eight of the Mobile Black Spot Program, which will close later this year. It’s just another way you integrate with your community and understand what’s happening. 

    CENATIEMPO: All right. Again, I think if a local Member is doing their job well enough, they should know where the black spots are in their electorates. But Kristy, always good to talk to you. We’ll catch up in a couple of weeks’ time. 

    MCBAIN: Sounds great. Thanks.

    MIL OSI News –

    January 25, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Security: Update 256 – IAEA Director General Statement on Situation in Ukraine

    Source: International Atomic Energy Agency – IAEA

    Ukraine’s Zaporizhzhya Nuclear Power Plant (ZNPP) lost the connection to its only remaining 330 kilovolt (kV) back-up power line for a second time this month, once again leaving the facility dependent on one single source of the external electricity it needs for reactor cooling and other key nuclear safety and security functions, Director General Rafael Mariano Grossi said today.

    The IAEA team stationed at the plant was informed that the power line was disconnected for more than 26 hours between Monday and Tuesday this week due to unspecified damage on the other side of the Dnipro River. It took place three weeks after another disconnection of the same line. In both instances, the ZNPP continued to receive electricity from its sole 750 kV line. Before the military conflict, Europe’s largest nuclear power plant (NPP) had four 750 kV and six 330 kV lines available.

    “What once would have been unthinkable – a major nuclear power plant suffering repeated off-site power cuts – has become a frequent occurrence during this devastating war. The situation is clearly not getting any better in this regard. The nuclear safety and security situation at the Zaporizhzhya Nuclear Power Plant remains highly precarious,” Director General Grossi said.

    Underlining the persistent risks, the IAEA team has continued to hear explosions every day over the past week, although no damage to the ZNPP was reported.

    The IAEA team members conducted walkdowns across the site as part of their activities to assess nuclear safety and security at the plant, including observing the testing of an emergency diesel generator (EDG) of reactor unit 4. In meetings with plant staff, they discussed other important topics, such as the modernization of control systems for the site’s EDGs as well as updated procedures related to the ZNPP’s radiation protection programme.

    As a follow up to their visit last week to the cooling tower damaged by a major fire in August, the team members also discussed with the ZNPP how it will assess the extent of the damage, including the selection of an external contractor to carry out this work.

    The IAEA teams present at the Khmelnytskyy, Rivne and South Ukraine NPPs and the Chornobyl site reported that nuclear safety and security is being maintained despite the effects of the ongoing conflict, including air raid alarms for several days over the past week.

    At the South Ukraine NPP, the IAEA team was informed that reactor unit 1 was disconnected from the grid for about four hours on Tuesday evening due to a spurious signal to the unit’s protection systems without the reactor safety systems being activated. The root cause of the event is being investigated. The reactor – one of three at the plant – is again generating power for the grid.

    At the request of Ukraine, an IAEA team is visiting six electrical substations in Ukraine this week, as part of the Agency’s work to assess the status of the electrical grid infrastructure essential to nuclear safety that began in September. During the visits, the team reviews the operational consequences of actual and potential damage to substations which supply off-site power to the country’s NPPs.  

    Reliable access to off-site power is one of the Seven Indispensable Pillars for ensuring nuclear safety and security during an armed conflict outlined by Director General Grossi two and a half years ago. The safety of operating NPPs is dependent on a stable grid connection, but the situation in this regard has become increasingly precarious in recent months.

    The IAEA already has teams of staff stationed at all of Ukraine’s NPPs who contribute to maintaining nuclear safety and security during the military conflict.

    The IAEA is continuing to implement its comprehensive programme of assistance in support of nuclear safety and security in Ukraine, including by delivering requested equipment. This week, two spectrometry systems enhancing the analytical capabilities of the hydrometeorological organizations of the Ukraine’s State Emergency Service were procured and delivered, funded by Switzerland. It was the 71st equipment delivery to Ukraine, totaling over 12.1 million euro since the start of the armed conflict.

    In addition, the Agency has coordinated the delivery of the two static test benches from the Rivne NPP to the supplier for repair during an outage of reactor unit 2. The repair was funded by Norway. The repair should be completed by the end of April next year, when the repaired test benches will be returned to the plant to enable the unit’s restart. The equipment is used in the nuclear and other industries to stress test components, including hydraulic shock absorbers.

    MIL Security OSI –

    January 25, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: PEL 83 Second Exploration Campaign Commencement of Operations – Spud of Mopane 1-A Well

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    TORONTO, Oct. 24, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Sintana Energy Inc. (TSX-V: SEI, OTCQB: SEUSF) (“Sintana” or the “Company”) is pleased to provide the following update regarding a second exploration and appraisal campaign on blocks 2813A and 2814B located in the heart of Namibia’s Orange Basin, emerging as one of the world’s most prospective oil and gas regions. The blocks are governed by Petroleum Exploration License 83 (“PEL 83”) which is operated by a subsidiary of Galp Energia (“Galp”) of Portugal. Sintana maintains an indirect 49% interest in Custos Energy (Pty) Ltd. (“Custos”), which in turn owns a 10% working interest owner in PEL 83. NAMCOR, the National Petroleum Company of Namibia, also maintains a 10% working interest.

    The drill ship Santorini has arrived on location and operations associated with the Mopane 1-A well have commenced. Specifically, the Mopane 1-A was spud 23:30 local time on October 23rd.

    This appraisal well is the first of an up to four well program potentially consisting of two exploration wells and two appraisal wells. This second campaign on PEL 83 is predicated on providing additional insights into the scope and quality of the Mopane complex.

    We refer to press releases from Galp (available at galp.com) and Custos (available at newsdirect.com) throughout Q1 and Q2 of 2024, noting that an inaugural two well exploration campaign that commenced in Q4 2023 resulted in multiple discoveries of significant columns of light oil in high-quality reservoir sands providing for an initial estimate of original oil in place (“OOIP”) of 10 billion barrels of oil equivalent. A drill stem test was also conducted resulting in an infrastructure constrained flow of 14,000 boe/d.

    Initial analysis suggests the reservoirs have good porosities, high pressures and high permeabilities in large hydrocarbon columns with very low oil viscosity, and no CO2 nor H2S. The flows achieved during the well test have reached the maximum allowed limits, positioning Mopane as, potentially, an important commercial discovery. 

    “We look forward to the continuing progress on PEL 83, further unveiling of the potential and quality of the Mopane complex. These efforts should provide additional insights into this world class opportunity and into our broader Orange Basin portfolio located at the heart of this emerging hydrocarbon province.” said Robert Bose, Chief Executive Officer of Sintana.

    ABOUT SINTANA ENERGY:

    The Company is engaged in petroleum and natural gas exploration and development activities on five large, highly prospective, onshore and offshore petroleum exploration licenses in Namibia, and in Colombia’s Magdalena Basin.

    On behalf of Sintana Energy Inc.,
    “A. Robert Bose”
    Chief Executive Officer

    For additional information or to sign-up to receive periodic updates about Sintana’s projects, and corporate activities, please visit the Company’s website at www.sintanaenergy.com

    Corporate Contacts:   Investor Relations Advisor:
    Robert Bose Sean J. Austin Jonathan Paterson
    Chief Executive Officer Vice-President Founder & Managing Partner
    212-201-4125 713-825-9591 Harbor Access
        475-477-9401
         

    Forward-Looking Statements

    Certain information in this release are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements consist of statements that are not purely historical, including statements regarding beliefs, plans, expectations or intensions for the future, and include, but not limited to, statements with respect to potential future farmout agreements on PEL 83 and/or PEL 87, and proposed future exploration and development activities on PEL 83 and/or PEL 90 and neighbouring properties, as well as the prospective nature of the Company’s property interests. Such statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results, performance or developments to differ materially from those contained in the statements, including, but not limited to risks relating to the receipt of all applicable regulatory approvals, results of exploration and development activities, the ability to source joint venture partners and fund exploration, permitting and government approvals, and other risks identified in the Company’s public disclosure documents from time to time. Readers are cautioned that the assumptions used in the preparation of such information, although considered reasonable at the time of preparation, may prove to be imprecise and, as such, undue reliance should not be placed on forward-looking statements. The Company assumes no obligation to update such information, except as may be required by law.

    NEITHER THE TSX VENTURE EXCHANGE NOR ITS REGULATION SERVICES PROVIDER (AS THAT TERM IS DEFINED IN THE POLICIES OF THE TSX VENTURE EXCHANGE) ACCEPTS RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ADEQUACY OR ACCURACY OF THIS RELEASE.

    A photo accompanying this announcement is available at: 
    https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/ca79be82-d8c9-4894-be4d-1acfbcc48be3

    The MIL Network –

    January 25, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: S. 4656, a bill to amend title 5, United State Code, concerning restrictions on the participation of certain Federal employees in partisan political activity, and for other purposes

    Source: US Congressional Budget Office

    S. 4656 would amend the Hatch Act, which limits certain political activities of federal employees. Under current law, most employees of the executive branch (referred to as “less restricted employees”) are allowed to participate in political management and campaign activities while off duty, as long as they are outside of federal facilities and do not use federal property. The bill would add employees of any Office of Inspector General or Office of Special Inspector General to the list of federal employees prohibited from participating in political management or campaigns (referred to as “further restricted employees”). Such prohibited activities include running for office, volunteering in any campaign, fundraising, or registering voters for a political party.

    MIL OSI USA News –

    January 25, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: Transocean Ltd. Provides Quarterly Fleet Status Report

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    STEINHAUSEN, Switzerland, Oct. 24, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Transocean Ltd. (NYSE: RIG) today issued a quarterly Fleet Status Report that provides the current status of, and contract information for, the company’s fleet of offshore drilling rigs.

    This quarter’s report includes the following updates:

    • Deepwater Atlas – Awarded a 365-day contract in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico at a dayrate of $635,000.
    • Deepwater Conqueror – Awarded a 365-day contract in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico at a dayrate of $530,000.
    • Deepwater Invictus – Awarded a 1095-day contract in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico at a dayrate of $485,000.
    • Deepwater Invictus – Awarded two one-well contract extensions in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico.
    • Dhirubhai Deepwater KG1 – Awarded a six-well contract in India at a dayrate of $410,000.
    • Transocean Spitsbergen – Customer exercised a three-well option in Norway at a dayrate of $483,000.
    • Transocean Endurance – Customer exercised a one-well option in Australia at a dayrate of $390,000.
    • Transocean Endurance – Customer exercised a five-well option in Australia at a dayrate of $390,000.

    The aggregate incremental backlog associated with these fixtures is approximately $1.3 billion. As of October 24, 2024, the company’s total backlog is approximately $9.3 billion.  

    The report can be accessed on the company’s website: www.deepwater.com.

    About Transocean

    Transocean is a leading international provider of offshore contract drilling services for oil and gas wells. Transocean specializes in technically demanding sectors of the global offshore drilling business with a particular focus on deepwater and harsh environment drilling services and operates the highest specification floating offshore drilling fleet in the world.

    Transocean owns or has partial ownership interests in and operates a fleet of 34 mobile offshore drilling units, consisting of 26 ultra-deepwater floaters and eight harsh environment floaters.

    Forward-Looking Statements

    The statements described herein that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These statements could contain words such as “possible,” “intend,” “will,” “if,” “expect,” or other similar expressions. Forward-looking statements are based on management’s current expectations and assumptions, and are subject to inherent uncertainties, risks and changes in circumstances that are beyond our control, and many cases, cannot be predicted. As a result, actual results could differ materially from those indicated by these forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially include, but are not limited to, estimated duration of customer contracts, contract dayrate amounts, future contract commencement dates and locations, planned shipyard projects and other out-of-service time, sales of drilling units, the cost and timing of mobilizations and reactivations, operating hazards and delays, risks associated with international operations, actions by customers and other third parties, the fluctuation of current and future prices of oil and gas, the global and regional supply and demand for oil and gas, the intention to scrap certain drilling rigs, the effects of the spread of and mitigation efforts by governments, businesses and individuals related to contagious illnesses, and other factors, including those and other risks discussed in the company’s most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023, and in the company’s other filings with the SEC, which are available free of charge on the SEC’s website at: www.sec.gov. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those indicated. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us or to persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by reference to these risks and uncertainties. You should not place undue reliance on forward looking statements. Each forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date of the particular statement. We expressly disclaim any obligations or undertaking to release publicly any updates or revisions to any forward-looking statement to reflect any change in our expectations or beliefs with regard to the statement or any change in events, conditions or circumstances on which any forward-looking statement is based, except as required by law. All non-GAAP financial measure reconciliations to the most comparative GAAP measure are displayed in quantitative schedules on the company’s website at: www.deepwater.com.

    This press release, or referenced documents, do not constitute an offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy, any securities, and do not constitute an offering prospectus within the meaning of the Swiss Financial Services Act (“FinSA”) or advertising within the meaning of the FinSA. Investors must rely on their own evaluation of Transocean and its securities, including the merits and risks involved. Nothing contained herein is, or shall be relied on as, a promise or representation as to the future performance of Transocean.

    Analyst Contact:
    Alison Johnson
    +1 713-232-7214

    Media Contact:
    Pam Easton
    +1 713-232-7647

    The MIL Network –

    January 25, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Tillis Statement On Cooper’s Mishandling of Disaster Recovery Funding

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for North Carolina Thom Tillis

    WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, Senator Thom Tillis responded to Governor Roy Cooper’s request for the N.C. General Assembly to cover a $175 million shortfall in the budget of the North Carolina Office of Recovery and Resiliency (NCORR) on recovery efforts for Hurricane Matthew (2016) and Hurricane Florence (2018). These funds were originally provided to the State of North Carolina by the federal government as part of disaster assistance packages funded and passed by Congress. 

    For the last six years, Tillis has pressed the Cooper Administration on the slow pace of spending on recovery and rebuilding efforts for Matthew and Florence. As recently as May of this year, Senator Tillis once again pressed NCORR Director Laura Hogshead for answers on the rebuilding process. 

    Nowhere in Hogshead’s response from June 2024 did she indicate that NCORR was facing such a massive shortfall of the funding originally allocated by Congress. Instead, she stated: “NCORR stands prepared to complete the homes of its current applicants and to respond quickly to any future disasters.”

    In 2022, the Office of Inspector General released a report finding that NCORR could not provide reasonable assurance that $2.5 million of the $5.4 million of federal assistance reviewed by the Inspector General was spent properly.   

    In response to the NCORR’s fiscal mismanagement, Senator Thom Tillis issued the following statement: 

    “For the last six years, I have been warning that Governor Cooper and NCORR were dropping the ball on distributing disaster relief to victims. NCORR’s last-second announcement of a staggering $175 million shortfall for Matthew and Florence recovery confirms those concerns were justified. It is scandalous that the Cooper Administration has failed thousands of North Carolina families, many of whom are still living in hotel rooms and still have no relief from storms that hit our state as long as eight years ago. Instead of working to actually fix this problem, it seems the Governor’s office has always been more focused on attacking anyone who drops a hint of criticism over their failure to get assistance to disaster victims. 

    “All this makes it much more difficult for North Carolina’s Congressional leaders to secure needed federal assistance for Helene victims when our colleagues look at the Cooper Administration’s failure to get federal assistance in the hands of Matthew and Florence victims. 

    “The next Governor must turn the page on the systemic incompetence and mismanagement of North Carolina’s disaster rebuilding efforts: the thousands of families who lost their homes to Helene certainly deserve better. While the NCGA is right to provide NCORR with some funding to keep operations running, state and federal leaders need to hear directly from Director Hogshead and Governor Cooper on how this appalling failure occurred on their watch, and there must be serious systematic changes to ensure North Carolina has a disaster office that is able to properly take care of disaster victims.” 

    MIL OSI USA News –

    January 25, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Duckworth, Durbin Join Sanders, Peters, Stabenow and 18 Fellow Senators in Demanding Stellantis Keep Its Promises to Autoworkers

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Illinois Tammy Duckworth

    October 24, 2024

    [WASHINGTON, D.C.] – In a letter sent yesterday to the automotive giant responsible for Chrysler, Dodge, Jeep and more, U.S. Senator Tammy Duckworth (D-IL) and U.S. Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin (D-IL) joined U.S. Senators Bernie Sanders (I-VT), Gary Peters (D-MI), Debbie Stabenow (D-MI) and 18 of their colleagues in urging Stellantis CEO Carlos Tavares to honor the collective bargaining agreement signed last year with the United Auto Workers (UAW) and the promises the company made to strengthen and expand good-paying union jobs in America. The Senators also reinforced the importance of re-opening the idled Stellantis plant in Belvidere.

    “We are writing to express our growing concerns about the failure of Stellantis, under your leadership, to honor the commitments it made to the United Auto Workers (UAW) in last year’s collective bargaining agreement…” wrote the Senators. “We urge Stellantis not to renege on the promises it made to American autoworkers and to provide details on the timelines for these investments.”

    In the contract ratified last year, Stellantis committed to:

    • Make nearly $19 billion in new investments and product commitments in the U.S.;
    • Re-open the plant in Belvidere, Illinois that was “indefinitely idled” last year;
    • Establish a parts and customer care Mega Hub in Belvidere;
    • Continue to manufacture the Dodge Durango in Detroit through 2025; and
    • Manufacture the next generation Dodge Durango in Detroit starting in 2026.

    Instead, Stellantis has taken actions that undermine the commitments made to the UAW and leave “behind thousands of American workers who built the company into the auto giant it is today,” wrote the Senators. These actions may include moving the next generation Dodge Durango out of the U.S. and into “low-cost” countries like Mexico, as well as delaying planned investments to reopen and expand the Belvidere assembly plant.

    This year, Stellantis has spent over $8 billion on stock buybacks and dividends to benefit its wealthy executives and stockholders. During the first six months of this year, Stellantis has generated over $6 billion in profits, making it one of the most profitable auto companies in the world. The company has also benefited from billions of dollars in financial assistance from American taxpayers and the federal government. In July, the Department of Energy announced Stellantis would receive nearly $335 million in federal dollars to support Belvidere Assembly Plant’s conversion to electric vehicle production.

    “Last year, while blue collar auto workers in Belvidere were being laid off indefinitely, you were able to receive a 56 percent pay raise, boosting your total compensation to $39.5 million, which made you the highest paid executive among traditional auto companies,” wrote the Senators. “We believe that if Stellantis can afford to spend over $8 billion this year on stock buybacks and dividends, it can live up to the contractual commitments it made to the UAW. This is especially true given the billions of dollars in financial assistance American taxpayers have spent to support your company and the enormous sacrifices autoworkers have been forced to make over many decades.”

    Joining Duckworth, Durbin, Sanders, Peters and Stabenow on the letter are U.S. Senators Tammy Baldwin (D-WI), Richard Blumenthal (D-CT), Sherrod Brown (D-OH), Cory Booker (D-NJ), Laphonza Butler (D-CA), Bob Casey (D-PA), Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY), Mazie Hirono (D-HI), Amy Klobuchar (D-MN), Ben Ray Luján (D-NM), Ed Markey (D-MA), Chris Murphy (D-CT), Jack Reed (D-RI), Jacky Rosen (D-NV), Chuck Schumer (D-NY), Tina Smith (D-MN), Chris Van Hollen (D-MD) and Elizabeth Warren (D-MA).

    The full letter is available here and below.

    Dear Mr. Tavares:

    We are writing to express our growing concerns about the failure of Stellantis, under your leadership, to honor the commitments it made to the United Auto Workers (UAW) in last year’s collective bargaining agreement.

    In that contract, ratified by UAW members, Stellantis committed to “establish long-term stability and job security” for its workforce. The agreement includes nearly $19 billion in new investment and product commitments in the United States, including promises to:

    • Re-open the plant in Belvidere, Illinois that was “indefinitely idled” last year;
    • Establish a parts and customer care Mega Hub in Belvidere;
    • Continue to manufacture the Dodge Durango in Detroit through 2025;
    • and Manufacture the next generation Dodge Durango in Detroit starting in 2026.

    We are deeply concerned that Stellantis is not keeping the promises it made to strengthen and expand good-paying union jobs in America.

    Specifically, Stellantis is now delaying planned investments to reopen and expand the Belvidere assembly plant, leaving behind thousands of American workers who built the company into the auto giant it is today. We are also concerned with reporting that Stellantis is planning to move production of the next generation Dodge Durango out of the United States, after previously announcing layoffs that threaten the economic security and well-being of thousands of autoworkers. Moreover, Stellantis has stated publicly that it plans to source 80 percent of supply from “low-cost countries” like Mexico. By your own admission, Stellantis’s growth plan hinges on shifting “industrial production into cost competitive countries” like Mexico, where workers are making substandard wages. These actions violate the obligations Stellantis made to the UAW. We urge Stellantis not to renege on the promises it made to American autoworkers and to provide details on the timelines for these investments.

    This year, Stellantis has spent over $8 billion on stock buybacks and dividends to benefit its wealthy executives and stockholders. Last year, while blue collar auto workers in Belvidere were being laid off indefinitely, you were able to receive a 56 percent pay raise boosting your total compensation to $39.5 million, which made you the highest paid executive among traditional auto companies. During the first six months of this year, Stellantis has generated over $6 billion in profits, making it one of the most profitable auto companies in the world.

    We believe that if Stellantis can afford to spend over $8 billion this year on stock buybacks and dividends, it can live up to the contractual commitments it made to the UAW. This is especially true given the billions of dollars in financial assistance American taxpayers have spent to support your company and the enormous sacrifices autoworkers have been forced to make over many decades.

    For example, the Department of Energy announced in July that nearly $335 million in federal dollars would be going to supporting Belvidere Assembly Plant’s conversion to electric vehicle production. With hundreds of millions of dollars of federal support going towards ensuring strong union jobs stay in the U.S., Stellantis must honor the promises it made to UAW workers and the Belvidere community.

    We urge you to deliver on the commitments you made to the UAW in your 2023 national agreement without further delay.

    -30-

    MIL OSI USA News –

    January 25, 2025
  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Activist News – Christchurch City Council leads – Luxon government must follow – PSNA

    Source: Palestine Solidarity Network Aotearoa

     

    Following the principled decision of the Christchurch City Council this week to change its procurement policy to exclude companies involved in illegal Israeli settlements, nationwide protests this week will be demanding the government:

     

    • Ban all imports into Aotearoa New Zealand from illegal Israeli settlements
    • End government procurement of goods and services from companies identified by the UN as complicit in the building and maintaining of illegal Israeli settlements
    • Direct the Superfund, ACC and Kiwisaver providers to end investments in the companies involved in illegal Israeli settlements

     

    The Christchurch City Council has shown the way. The Luxon government must follow.

     

    PSNA has asked the government to take these steps – we have had no response for two months.

     

    John Minto

    National Chair

    Palestine Solidarity Network Aotearoa

     

    Nationwide rallies/marches/MP protests/vigils this week

     

    These are on the PSNA Facebook events page here with the basic details listed below.

     

    North Island
    Opononi – Gathering for Palestine
    Sunday 27 October
    No Rally this weekend
     
    Kerikeri – Rally
    Saturday 26 October
    No Rally this weekend
     
    Whangarei – Rally
    Saturday 26 October
    No Rally this weekend
     
    Auckland – Talk by Vijay Prashad
    Thursday 24 October
    7:00 pm
    Western Springs Garden Community Center
    956 Great North Road, Western Springs
     
    Auckland – Picket
    Friday 25 October
    No Picket this Friday – Labour Weekend
    Next picket Wed 30 October @ 4:00 pm outside the US Consulate
      
    Waiheke – Market Stall – hosted by Stand With Palestine Waiheke!
    Every Saturday
    8:00 am – 1:00 pm
    Ostend Market, Waiheke Island
     
    Auckland – Banners around Tamaki Makaurau
    Every Saturday
    10:00 am
    Text John on 021 899 659 for location
     
    Auckland – Rally
    Saturday 26 October
    2:00 pm
    Te Komititanga – Britomart Square, Tamaki Makaurau
     
    Thames – Vigil to Stop the war on Children
    (Hosted by The Basket – Social and Environmental Justice – Hauraki)
    First Saturday of the month
     
    Tauranga – Flag wave
    Monday 28 – Labour Day
    1:00 am
    Coronation park, Mt Maunganui
     
    Whakatane
    Saturday 26 October
    Rallies are being organised
    Watch this space
     
    Hamilton – Flag Waving for Palestine
    Saturday 26 October
    1:00 pm
    Flynn Park, Hamilton
     
    Raglan
    To be advised
    Watch this space
     
    Cambridge – Rally for Palestine
    Every Saturday
    11:00 am
    Cambridge Town Hall
     
    Rotorua – Rally for Palestine
    Every Thursday
    4:30 pm
    National MP Todd McClays Office – Cnr Amohau and Ranolf St lights, Rotorua
     
    Gisborne – Farmers Market – Vigil to Stop the war on Children
    Every Saturday
    9:30 – 11:30 am
    Gisborne Farmers Market
     
    Napier – Rally for Palestine
    Saturday 26 October
    11:30 am
    Marine Parade Soundshell Roundabout
     
    Hastings – Rally for Palestine
    Sunday 27 October
    1:00 pm
    Hastings Town Clock – Hastings CBD
     
    Palmerston North – Rally for Palestine
    Sunday 27 October
    2:00 pm
    The Square, Palmerston North
     
    New Plymouth – Flags on the Bridge
    Friday 25 September
    4:30 pm
    Paynters Ave Bridge, New Plymouth
     
    New Plymouth – March for Gaza
    Saturday 26 October
    1:00 PM
    Huatoki Plaza, Ngamotu, New Plymouth
     
    Whanganui – Rally for Palestine
    Saturday 26 October
    11:00 am
    Riverside Market, Whanganui
     
    Carterton – Gathering for Gaza
    Every Tuesday
    12:00 midday
    Memorial Square.
     
    Martinborough – Vigil for Palestine
    Every Wednesday
    11:00 am
    The square at the top of Kitchener St, Martinborough
     
    Masterton – Gathering for Gaza
    Every Sunday
    9:30 am
    Town Hall Lawn, Masterton
     
    Featherston – Gathering for Gaza
    Every Saturday
    11:00 am
    The Squircle (opposite the op shop).
     
    Wellington – Vigil for Palestine (by Aotearoa Healthcare Workers for Palestine)
    Every Friday
    6:00 pm
    In front of Wellington Hospital
    49 Riddiford Street, Newtown, Wellington
     
    Wellington – Flags on the Bridge
    (hosted by the Falastin Tea Collective)
    Every Friday
    7:15 – 8:15 am
    Hill Street bridge Overbridge, Wellington
     
    Wellington – Obela boycott rally
    (hosted by the Falastin Tea Collective)
    Saturday 26 October
    1:00 – 2:00 pm
    Outside Countdown in Newtown, Wellington
    Meeting on the corner of Hanson St and John St
     
    South Island
    Nelson – Rally for Palestine
    Saturday 26 October
    10:30 am
    Rocks Road by the beach
     
    Blenheim – Rally for Palestine
    Saturday 26 October
    11:00 am
    Blenheim Railway Station
     
    Littleton – Flag Waving for Palestine
    Wednesday 23 October
    4:00 pm
    Corner of Sutton Quay and Norwich Quay, Littleton
     
    Christchurch – Flag Waving for Palestine
    Friday 25 October
    4:00 pm
    Bridge of Remembrance, Cashel Street, Christchurch
     
    Christchurch – Rally
    Saturday 26 October
    1:00 – 2:00 pm
    Bridge of Remembrance, Cashel Street, Christchurch
     
    Timaru
    No Rally this weekend
     
    Dunedin – Rally and March
    Saturday 19 October
    No Rally this weekend
     
    Queenstown
    No Rally this weekend
     
    Invercargill – Rally for Palestine
    Sunday 27 October
    1:00 pm
    Wachner place Invercargill.

    MIL OSI New Zealand News –

    January 25, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: New Report Reveals Historic Surge in Small Business Financing Under Biden-Harris Administration

    Source: United States Small Business Administration

    WASHINGTON – Today, Vice President Kamala Harris and Administrator Isabel Casillas Guzman, head of the U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) and the voice for America’s more than 34 million small businesses in President Biden’s Cabinet, announced that the SBA delivered a transformative $56 billion to small businesses and disaster-impacted communities in Fiscal Year 2024 (FY24). The FY24 Capital Impact Report released today shows that the Agency increased its annual capital portfolio – which includes startup, growth, and recovery capital, as well as surety bonds – by 7% over Fiscal Year 2023 (FY23). Moreover, for the first time since 2008, the SBA made more than 100,000 financings to small businesses, representing a 22% increase over FY23 and a 50% increase over 2020.

    “Under the Biden-Harris Administration, the SBA has revolutionized its capital access programs, helping finance tens of thousands of small businesses in every corner of this country,” said Administrator Guzman. “As every entrepreneur knows, capital is critical – it’s integral to business owners at all stages of their journey, from startup to growth and resilience. Through loans, investments, and surety bond guarantees, the SBA has helped power the small businesses that have in turn powered America’s unparalleled economic recovery from the COVID-19 crisis. Today, we are proud to share data that reveals how in FY24 the Biden-Harris Administration contributed once again to the historic Small Business Boom which has revitalized Main Streets and innovation hubs across America.”

    The SBA’s FY24 Capital Impact Report shows a marked spike in small dollar loans. This notable increase comes on the heels of the agency’s historic program reforms in late FY23 that improved access to affordable small loans. Specifically, these reforms modernized lending criteria for small loans, welcomed new lenders with expertise on underserved borrowers into the 7(a) program, and made it easier for both lenders and business owners to work with the SBA. The FY24 Capital Impact Report reveals that these reforms contributed to a doubling of loans less than $150,000 since FY20, and a 33% increase since FY23.

    Since 2020, the most dramatic trend in the SBA’s capital programs has been the outsized growth in loans to Black-, Latino-, and women-owned businesses. In FY 2024, across its signature 7(a) and 504 loan programs, the SBA backed:

    • 5,200 loans for $1.5 billion to Black-owned businesses, a tripling of loan count relative to FY20.
    • 9,600 loans for $3.3 billion to Latino-owned businesses, reflecting a loan count 2.5 times greater than in FY20.
    • 15,500 loans for $5.6 billion to majority women-owned businesses, representing doubling in women-owned business participation relative to FY20.

    The FY24 Capital Impact Report also revealed the power of the Biden-Harris Administration’s Investing in America Agenda. In 2023 and 2024, construction became the leading industry in the SBA’s 7(a) program, reflecting in part the once-in-a-generation investment in infrastructure and domestic manufacturing since President Biden took office.

    View the complete FY24 Capital Impact report, which includes additional data. For complete data on the SBA’s loan programs visit SBA Office Of Capital Access – Dataset – U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) | Open Data.

    Small businesses can visit SBA’s Lender Match page to be matched with participating SBA Lenders that can provide funding with competitive rates and fees.

    ###

    About the U.S. Small Business Administration 
    The U.S. Small Business Administration helps power the American dream of business ownership. As the only go-to resource and voice for small businesses backed by the strength of the federal government, the SBA empowers entrepreneurs and small business owners with the resources and support they need to start, grow, or expand their businesses, or recover from a declared disaster. It delivers services through an extensive network of SBA field offices and partnerships with public and private organizations. To learn more, visit www.sba.gov.

    MIL OSI USA News –

    January 25, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Australia: Robotics revolution: UniSA sparks STEM passion for future teachers

    Source: University of South Australia

    25 October 2024

    Cheers of excitement, high-fives all around, and wide, beaming smiles – they’re all the signs of a team success. But this is not a sporting field – this is the camaraderie found among the next generation of teachers learning the very latest, world-class robotics programs so they can excite and inspire students about STEM.

    And on World Teachers Day today, there’s no better time to highlight passionate, job-ready teachers who have the expertise needed to tackle STEM skills shortages across Australia.

    Robotics and automation are in huge demand across multiple industries. Yet, despite the need, very few education initiatives are preparing students with these future skills.

    As the only university in Australia and Southeast Asia to incorporate VEX Robotics as part of its digital electronics undergraduate course, UniSA’s pre-service teachers are ensuring the future workforce is not only skilled, but passionate about robotics and STEM.

    UniSA Education Futures course developer and robotics expert, Emil Zankov, says it’s vital for universities and schools to embrace robotics as part of their students’ learning experience.

    “Robotics is a fantastic way to introduce and get students excited about STEM and computer science. Yet many teachers struggle to embrace new technologies because they’re not familiar with them and didn’t learn about them at uni,” Zankov says.

    “That’s where UniSA comes in. Through the VEX educational robotics program, our pre-service teachers graduate with the skills to teach robotics confidently and creatively in schools.

    “It’s so important for universities to educate teachers with these sorts of technical skills; not only because we have a responsibility to deliver professional, job-ready graduates, but also because these teachers will be the ones to inspire students to consider STEM pathways as an exciting area to pursue.”

    UniSA’s undergraduate Secondary Education students in their robotics class.

    Globally there is a STEM talent shortage, with nearly half of businesses struggling to recruit people with the STEM skills they need. In Australia, school students’ interest and performance in STEM subjects is stagnating or declining, with the Australian government calling for a collective effort to initiate change.

    Zankov says VEX is the program of choice because it can deliver robotics education across the school continuum, from Reception through to Year 12.

    “This is a platform that we can use all the way from five-year-olds through to our high school and tertiary students. That’s what makes it so exciting – we have this resource rich environment, and very robust program that allows lots of different aspects of robotics any pre-service teacher to engage in,” Zankov says.

    “Through the VEX program teachers support their students to plan, design, code and construct a working robot, with the option of entering it into a competition at the end of the module.

    “But it’s not just about technical or engineering skills; the program also embraces strategy, teamwork, resilience, automation, documentation and report writing, problem solving and more. So, there are a lot of transferable skills that come into play.

    “Ultimately, being involved in this program inspires students to want to go into STEM through an authentic, hands-on approach they’ve had at school.

    “When you hear students audibly excited about what they’re doing in class, there’s no better satisfaction. Seeing students learning because they want to learn; seeing them passionate, high fiving each other, and saying, ‘Yes, it’s working!’ and their robot is doing what they wanted it to do after they’ve programmed it… that’s what really puts such a buzz in a teacher. That’s pure magic.”

    Notes to editors:

    The SA VEX State Championships will be held at UniSA’s Mawson Lakes campus on Monday 28 October. Run by DATTA (Design and Technology Teachers Association of SA) in collaboration with the University of South Australia, this competition will see more than 300 school students showcase and compete their robots in a series of graded competitions. To find out more, visit: https://datta.sa.edu.au/datta-sa-vex-tournament/

    Photos available upon request

    Video available here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DWiPLcJLGp0

    …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

    Contact for interview:  Emil Zankov E: Emil.Zankov@unisa.edu.au
    Media contact: Annabel Mansfield M: +61 479 182 489 E: Annabel.Mansfield@unisa.edu.au

    Other articles you may be interested in

    MIL OSI News –

    January 25, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Economics: Transcript of Press Briefing: Asia and Pacific Department Regional Economic Outlook October 24

    Source: International Monetary Fund

    October 24, 2024

    Speakers:

    KRISHNA SRINIVASAN, Director of the Asia and Pacific Department, International Monetary Fund

    THOMAS HELBLING, Deputy Director, Asia and Pacific Department, International Monetary Fund

    Moderator:

    RANDA ELNAGAR, Senior Communications Officer, International Monetary Fund

    *  *  *  *  *

    MS. ELNAGAR:  Good morning and welcome to our attendees here in the room and those joining us online and virtually.  This is the Press Briefing on the Regional Economic Outlook  for the Asia Pacific Department.  I am Randa Elnagar of the IMF’s Communications Department.  Joining me today is Krishna Srinivasan, Director of the Asia Pacific Department, and Thomas Helbling, Deputy Director of the Asia Pacific Department.  To kickstart our briefing, Krishna is going to give some opening remarks and then we’re going to take your questions.  Thank you. 

    MS. SRINIVASAN: Thank you, Randa.  Good morning to everyone here in Washington, D.C.  Good evening to everyone in Asia.  Welcome to our Press Briefing for Asia and the Pacific.  Allow me to make a few opening remarks. 

              Let me start with growth.  In the first half of this year, Asia’s economies grew stronger than we had expected.  As a result, we have upgraded our regional forecast to 4.6 percent in 2024 and to 4.4 percent in 2025.  With this, Asia remains the world’s engine of growth.  It generates 60 percent of global growth, far more than its share in global GDP of about 40 percent. 

              Going forward, we expect domestic demand to strengthen in advanced Asia as the impact of past monetary tightening fades.  Growth in India and China would remain resilient, even though in both economies it would slow slightly in 2025.  For emerging markets outside China and India, we expect robust and broad based growth. 

            Inflation.  Asia has also brought inflation down to low and stable rates faster than other regions.  In Emerging Asia, the disinflation process is essentially complete.  There are a few exceptions in advanced Asia, notably Australia and New Zealand, where wage pressures have kept services inflation elevated.  But we expect these pressures to fade as well within the next 12 months or so. 

              This means that most Asian central banks now have room to cut interest rates earlier in the year.  Some central banks may have been reluctant to ease before the Federal Reserve, fearing that this could put their currencies under pressure.  But as the Fed has now started its own easing cycle, such concerns should have dissipated.

              Let me add a little bit more detail on the China outlook.  As you can see on the left hand side, activity has decelerated since the first quarter.  As a result, we have marked down growth to 4.8 percent in 2024 compared to 5 percent in our July WEO update.  In particular, the property sector has continued to deteriorate and weigh on investment, while private consumption has also weakened amid low consumer confidence.  This forecast incorporates the monetary and financial sector policies that were announced in September. 

              Weak Chinese demand is triggering into continued disinflationary pressures as shown on the right-hand side core inflation fell to 0.1 percent year-on-year in September.  Several developments have taken place since we finalized our China forecast.  Q3 data came out marginally weaker than we expected.  At the same time, the authorities announced additional fiscal and housing measures which could provide some upside potential to our growth projection, especially in 2025 when the policy measures are likely to take effect. 

              The external environment remains tough.  Going back to the broader region, the environment in which Asian policymakers act has become tougher.  Risks to the outlook are now tilted to the downside.  For example, there are tentative signs that global demand could weaken, including from the United States, which would be bad news for an export dependent region like Asia.  China’s domestic demand weakness also continues to weigh on the wider region. 

              Moreover, countries across the globe continue to implement trade restrictions at a rapid pace.  We see already how trade flows are adjusting:  China, for example, exports relatively more to emerging markets and less to advanced economies than five years ago.  The ASEAN economies export more to China and the U.S. as trade targeted by U.S. and Chinese startups get channeled through third countries.  In economic terms, this is a costly detour.  As we stressed before, no one really wins from trade fragmentation.  We all pay for this with slower global growth.  And Asia has more to lose than others given its tight integration into global supply chains. 

              Now, how should Asian policymakers navigate this environment?  I talked already about monetary policy where welcome policy space has emerged.  Unfortunately, the same is not true for fiscal policy.  Public debt increased sharply during the Pandemic in Pacific Island countries.  Debt ratios almost doubled, but debt has hardly come down since then.  This drives up debt service costs and leaves governments with little spending power to address unforeseen events. 

              In some economies, weak private demand may justify somewhat larger fiscal deficits in the near-term.  Again, the emphasis is on the near-term.  But for most Asian countries, it’s time to start budget reconsolidation in earnest, both to build buffers against downside risks and to preserve spending power for addressing longer term challenges such as climate change and population aging. 

              Let me spend a few words on another long-term issue, structural transformation and the future of Asian growth.  Asia’s traditional development model has been based on moving workers from agriculture into manufacturing and on selling the manufactured goods in the global market.  The success has been spectacular.  It unleashed the maybe greatest development success in story of human history.  In recent decades, Asian economies have shifted more into services rather than manufacturing, however.  This has been good for growth as modern services are often more productive than manufacturing.  This trend is likely to continue as many Asian economies have reached income levels where the demand for manufactured goods typically declines and the demand for services tends to increase. 

              Moreover, digital technology is making some services, such as business and finance, tradable in global markets.  A global market for services holds large growth opportunities, but harvesting them will require reforms.  In particular, education and training will be important.  It will need to equip workers with the skills to provide modern services.  And Asia should open up its services sectors to trade and investment.  They remain relatively closed now, different from manufacturing. 

              Finally, let me note, we will publish the Regional Economic Outlook  November 1 in Tokyo, together with an analytical piece about the future of Asia’s growth model. 

              With this, Thomas and I will be happy to take your questions.  Thank you. 

    MS. ELNAGAR: Thank you, Krishna.  Please raise your hand and identify yourself and your news organization. 

    QUESTIONER:  Thank you, Randa, for taking my question.  I’m Maoling Xiong with Xinhua News Agency.  So, Krishna, I talked about fragmentation in your opening remarks.  I wonder whether you could elaborate a little bit on the economic impact of economic fragmentation on Asia, especially it’s so integrated into the global system.  Thank you. 

    MS. SRINIVASAN: Thank you for the question, Maoling.  As you know, there is evidence that global supply chains have been rewiring in recent years.  Now this goes for the time before the Pandemic and into the context of U.S. China trade tensions.  Now we have done some work in our Regional Economic Outlook which is forthcoming, which looks at the impact of the trade tension between U.S and China on Asian economies. 

              What we find is that many Asian economies, notably those in the ASEAN, have increased their market shares of both Chinese and U.S. imports in both gross and value added terms, in what we call as connected countries.  Now we also find that these third-party Asian countries, exports of targeted goods, of the goods which are targeted for tariffs by U.S. and China, they’ve also increased.  And what we find particularly the case is for some countries like Thailand, Korea and Singapore, these effects are particularly strong.  In other words, the sectors which are targeted by tariffs have seen ASEAN countries exporting more. 

              Now again, I was talking about the targeted sectors.  If you look at the aggregate growth, aggregate export growth, the question is whether these increase in targeted exports show up in the aggregate exports.  And there the picture is mixed.  Some countries have done better.  For instance, Vietnam has done better both in terms of targeted exports and aggregate exports. 

              But the point I’d like to leave with you here is in the short run we see these trade patterns changing.  The question, of course, is whether this is temporary, whether it’s permanent.  It’s only time will tell.  But our analysis, you know, has shown that in the long run everyone hurts from trade fragmentation, from fragmentation and that’s because global demand comes down.  When global demand comes on, everyone hurts.  So this is the message I would like to leave with that there have been shifting trade patterns because of fragmentation.  But the point here is over the long run, everybody will lose.  And so we all have to collectively fight against these forces of fragmentation. 

    MS. ELNAGAR: Thank you, Krishna.  Lady in the pink jacket.

    QUESTIONER:  Hi, my name is Ray Zho, financial journalist at 21st Century Rui Zhou,China.  So I have two questions.  First is about Asia Pacific.  The IMF report has indicated a somewhat positive growth outlook for Asia Pacific region, especially in emerging markets compared to other regions.  So can you elaborate on the key factors contributing to this relative strength?  And the second question is about China.  So China’s recent economic stimulus measures could create potential opportunities for stronger growth in the future.  So can you elaborate on these measures and the potential long-term benefits for China’s economic structure?  Thank you. 

    MS. ELNAGAR: Thank you.  Do we have any other questions on China?  Okay, the lady here. 

    QUESTIONER:  Thank you.  My name is Xu Tao from China Central Television, and I have two questions.  The first is how do you evaluate China’s role in the development of the world economy?  And the second is about the trade tension between the U.S. and China.  As you mentioned, the trade and the trade tension between U.S. and China will affect the Asian growth.  So if more traverse, if more tariffs are imposed on the Chinas by an incoming U.S.  administration, how will that affect Asian growth?  Thank you. 

    MS. ELNAGAR: One more on China.  The gentleman. 

    QUESTIONER:  Hi, good morning.  My question is for Krishna.  Thank you so much.  You said in your presentation that the growth in India and China will slow down in 2025.  Can you please elaborate reasons as to why the growth will slow down.  And also about the South Asian countries, the growth in like Nepal, Bangladesh, if you could elaborate as that as well.  Thank you. 

    MS. SRINIVASAN: Okay, thank you for those questions on China.  So let me – let me start by saying that we have revised on our growth forecast for China for 2024 to 4.8 percent, and that is coming down from 5 percent we had in the Article IV Consultations and during the July WEO update.  

              The question is why have we revised down?  Now if you look at growth in China, domestic demand has been very weak since the first quarter.  So numbers coming out from China since Q1 have been pretty weak.  Now that is offset somewhat by the measures announced in September, the monetary and financial measures.  Again, we have to break up these measures into two sets.  One is the monetary and financial sector policies, which were announced in September, and the fiscal policy measures, which were announced in October.  So the first set of measures were already internalized in our baseline forecast.  And that — so you had Q1, activity since Q1 being very weak, offset by some support measures.  So we mark it down to 4.8 percent.  Now support since then could provide some upside potential. 

              The question you asked also is:  how do we see the impact of these measures now?  Most of these measures, which were announced in September on the monetary and financial sector side, were consistent with what we had elaborated on in our Article IV reports in July.  So we welcome those measures.  And on the fiscal measures, we’re still awaiting further details, including how big it is, how – how will it retarget?  We know the broad areas of targeting.  They’re trying to reduce the debt for local governments and trying to alleviate the problems in the property sector.  But we still don’t know all the details.  

              Now, going beyond this, what are we saying is that to address the – the issue of weak domestic demand and to put the economy back on a more sustainable trajectory, there needs to be — more needs to be done to help rehabilitate the property sector.  And we provided these numbers estimates.  We think central government support both to, you know, finish these pre-sold housing is important.  It’s important to resolve the unviable developers.  So all that will take some fiscal costs.  And we are very clear that in the near-term China could use some of the fiscal resources to address the problem in the property sector.  But beyond the near-term, over the medium term, given rising debt levels, China will need to embark on consolidation.  

              We also talk about refocusing expenditures to boost social safety nets and do pension reform, which will allow China to save more going forward.  So right now China saves a lot.  So if you have these measures addressing Social Security and pensions, that will allow Chinese to save less, and that will also provide a boost to domestic demand, rebalance the economy, and also lead to lower imbalances going forward.  

              Now there are other questions on why Asia is doing better.  Emerging markets in Asia doing well.  See, in Asia you had a huge labor force, which is more — which is cheaper than other parts of the world.  Productivity has been high in many parts of Asia, and this is a region which is really integrated well into global supply chains and the global economy, and so on.  So that lends inherent dynamism to the region, and that we expect to continue going forward.  However, you do see some problems going forward in terms of populations aging in some parts of the world, some parts of Asia, notably in China, Korea.  It’s already happening in Japan and so on.  So you have population aging, you have AI coming into play, you have climate change.  All these are factors which could affect, you know, prospects going forward.  But that’s where you need reforms which address these challenges going forward.  

              Now, there were some questions on –

    MS. ELNAGAR: We can stick to China now and then go to other questions.

    MS. SRINIVASAN: We’ll come back to other questions.  So those are the questions.  Response on China. 

    MS. ELNAGAR: Okay, next.  Okay, we go to this side.  Gentleman.

    QUESTIONER:  thank you very much.  Thank you very much, Randa.  Shu Tataoka from JiJi Press.  I have a question on Japanese economy.  In the latest WEO, you have revised up the BOJ neutral rate to 1.5 percent.  And what is the implication of such drastically revised up, especially given Japanese high debt level?  And another question is on Japanese yen.  Japanese yen has depreciated recently again.  And what is your view on that – that development?  Can you describe it as excessive movement which we should pay attention?  Thank you. 

    MS. ELNAGAR: Any other questions on Japan? 

    MS. SRINIVASAN: Okay.  Thank you for the question.  Let me, you have — you have a number of questions.  One question — so let me answer one by one.  We welcomed the Bank of Japan’s decision to increase the policy rate in July, which will help anchor inflation and inflation expectations at around the 2 percent target.  Now, given balanced risks of inflation, further hikes in policy rates should proceed at a gradual pace.  Now, nominal neutral rate estimates for Japan range from 1 to 2 percent based on different methodologies and we now expect the policy rate to reach 1.5 percent in 2027. 

              Now, in terms of what does – what do rising interest rates in Japan mean for the rest of the world?  Now, from a very global perspective, an increase in interest rates in Japan could have output spillovers to other sovereign debt markets where Japanese investors hold large positions.  But that said, so far we’ve seen these growth spillovers to be pretty muted because the BOJ decisions have been well communicated and they’ve been very gradual.  So it’s been — markets have been given the time to both internalize these changes and what comes next.  So in that sense, the spillovers have been limited. 

              Now you ask the question what does also mean for the rest of the world?  I think rising interest rates gives support.  Gives, I mean, it’s in line with, you know, improving prospects in Japan.  Though when Japan’s economy grows, it’s good for both the region and – and for the global economy. 

              Now, in terms of the exchange rate.  The Japanese authorities are fully committed to a flexible exchange rate regime.  So we’ve seen exchange rate depreciation and appreciation over the past one year.  So it’s been pretty flexible.  Now that said, the yen has been used as a funding currency for carry trade.  And that means that over the past year or so, sometimes the changes in the yen can be magnified because of the unwinding of carry trade.  And we saw that on August 5th, not just because of what happened in terms of the BOJ increasing rates, but also because in response to how the labor market of this came out, the reaction was magnified because of the unwinding of carry trade.  So that’s been an issue.  But other than that, what we feel are the authorities are fully committed to the flexible exchange rate regime.  Thank you. 

    MS. ELNAGAR: Thank you, Krishna.  Can we move to the India question?  And then I have another India question that came in online from Informist Media, Siddharth Upasani.  The IMF sees India growth declining to 6.5 percent in FY26.  This is lower than Reserve Bank of India forecast 7 percent.  The RBI, in fact, is far more bullish about India’s growth in general, with Deputy Governor Michael Patra saying in New York on Monday that there is a strong possibility of India’s GDP growth returning to an 8 percent trend after FY26.  Does the IMF share this view?  If not, do you think Indian authorities are being overly optimistic?

              Any other questions on India or you ready to discuss?  

    MS. SRINIVASAN: Yeah, thank you for those two questions.  I’ll have my colleague Thomas answer the question. 

    MR. HELBLING: On India.  So on India and on growth, I think it’s important with the general point, we see India as the strongest growing major emerging market economy this year, but also in the coming years.  Point number one.  Point number two, this year we have revised up growth for the current fiscal year in year 7 percent, reflecting stronger — the expectation of stronger private consumption after a favorable monsoon season that will strengthen in particular rural demand. 

    In terms of the growth trajectory, India had 8 percent last year.  This year we project 7 and then to 6.5 percent.  For us, it’s a return back to potential after the Pandemic, after government’s recent infrastructure push and after the rebound after some financial stresses.  India has benefited from strong cyclical growth, and we now expect a return back to potential over the next two years, six and a half percent.  I would note that potential growth for India had been revised upward last year, and there is scope for even higher potential with adequate more structural reforms.  Our India team has noted in particular labor market reforms, some fiscal reforms, and maybe an increased infrastructure push, and also if there were reforms to education and skilling the labor force.  So there is scope for even higher growth.  But at the moment we see policies consistent or our current policies, we see six and a half percent potential growth which is high. 

    MS. SRINIVASAN: If I could just add, you know, we have in the REO chapter we have an analytical note on structural transformation where countries will move towards more services led growth.  I think in that context there’s a lot of potential for India to benefit from that kind of growth.  However, to benefit from that kind of growth, significant amount of investment has to take place in education and scaling of labor which as Thomas mentioned.  So we want to look at that note when it comes out next week. 

    MS. ELNAGAR: Thank you.  I think he also asked about Nepal so we can move because we have I think a Webex question on Nepal.  So Sharad, if you can please put on your screen camera and turn on the audio.  Sharad? 

    QUESTIONER:  Good afternoon.  Sorry, good evening.  Am I audible? 

    MS. ELNAGAR: We can hear you.  Yes. 

    QUESTIONER:  Okay, I will ask two questions.  One, IMF, has sent Nepal’s county rep between ECF agreement, why did the Fund send country representatives in between the agreements?  And second, some individuals argue that Nepal have not carried out required fiscal and monetary reform as promised under ECF.  How do you access Nepal’s progress regarding ECF commitments?  Thank you. 

    MS. ELNAGAR: Thank you. 

    MR. HELBLING: On Nepal, we have regular changes in our staff, as you know, we have staff mobility, regular changes in assignments.  So we have a transition in resident representatives as we also have in other countries.  Point number two on the ECF.  Nepal has an ECF.  The arrangement started in 2022.  So far we have completed four reviews under the program.  Discussions for the fifth review are underway.  There was a change in government in August, so the discussions are continuing with the new government.  And as to my knowledge, performance on the quantitative performance criteria is strong.  There is some discussion ongoing about whether some requirements on the structural benchmarks have been met and or whether there need be a recalibration of some of the structural benchmarks.  These are ongoing discussions, and the Nepal team will soon go back into the field. 

    MS. ELNAGAR: Thank you, Thomas.  Questions from the room.  The lady in the third row. 

    QUESTIONER:  Hello, my name is Sanghoon Lee.  I’m from the Korea Economic Daily newspaper.  I got a question for Krishna Srinivasan.  Since after  the United States presidential election, it is likely the economics conflict between the United States and China will escalate even further.  So I believe this kind of a situation is highly likely to constrain the economic growth of countries like South Korea.  So my question is, I’m curious to what extent this scenario is reflected to your outlook.  And also, I would like to hear how much impact do you expect it to have on Korea’s economic growth afterwards.  Thank you. 

    MS. SRINIVASAN: Thank you.  You asked me that question, but Thomas could answer. 

    QUESTIONER:  Yeah.  And I will add one more question that came online from Korea from Ahn Taeho, Hankyoreh.  She said, could you provide a brief evaluation of the current state and outlook of South Korean economy.  Specifically, while exports seem to be recovering, domestic demand remains sluggish.  What does the IMF see the main reasons behind the weak domestic consumption and what is the forecast for its recovery? 

    MR. HELBLING: So, for Korea, our forecast for this year is 2.5 percent and then growth will slow towards potential to 2 percent next year.  As you mentioned, growth in first half of this year was stronger than expected.  Very strong growth.  In particular on the external side, domestic demand was weaker than in the external sector or the export sector.  This weakness in domestic demand reflected in particular the loss or the erosion of purchasing power.  With the rise, the surge inflation globally and then the monetary policy tightening which affected domestic demand in particular through the relatively high private debt burden, increasing debt service payments.  This situation is about to change.  As the Bank of Korea has started the monetary policy easing cycle, inflation has declined.  So, with the similar nominal compensation and income increases, real purchasing power will increase, and we expect domestic demand to strengthen. 

    Indeed, in the Q3 release that was just released last night, Washington time, domestic demand in Korea has strengthened in Q3 as expected.  As for trade tensions, these are not — our baseline does not incorporate a further increase in trade tensions.  As noted in the release of the World Economic Outlook and as also noted or will be noted down in our Regional Economic Outlook, an increase in trade tensions is a major downside risk.  Korea is very strongly integrated in global supply chains into global markets and exposed, strongly exposed both to China and the United States. 

            So as previous regional economics outlooks have highlighted, Korea will be relatively more affected negatively if there were a further increase in the trade tensions between the United States and China.  I cannot say much more because if there were an increase in trade tensions, much would depend on details on measures, the extent of the increase in tensions so far.  And so there’s no point in going further at this point.  Thank you. 

    MS. ELNAGAR: Thank you.  We can take question from the gentleman. 

    QUESTIONER:  Hi.  Thank you for the opportunity, I’m with Idika from Economy Next from Sri Lanka.  I have two questions.  Now that the debt restructuring process is largely completed, what are the key fiscal or structural benchmark does Sri Lanka need to meet in order to unlock the fourth transfer of funding?  And how does the recent change in government impact the timeline or the likelihood of achieving these targets? 

              The second question is that there are talks that the new government is sort of contemplating dropping the imputed rental tax that is supposed to come next year.  Has this been discussed with the IMF so far?  Also, what’s IMF position on Sri Lanka continuing with the vehicle suspension? 

    MS. ELNAGAR: Any other question on Sri Lanka? 

    QUESTIONER:  Hi, thank you for taking my question.  My name is Magnus Sherman, I’m with Reorg.  I wanted to touch on the Sri Lanka’s debt restructuring.  We heard the Managing Director just an hour ago say that it’s important to help countries back on their feet as quickly as possible.  The Macro link bonds Sri Lanka has this mechanism where the better they perform, the more debt they effectively have to pay back.  So you could argue that does the exact opposite.  What’s the IMF’s position on this?  Is that something you would recommend future restructurings to include as well?  I know it’s very popular among creditors, but it could backfire. 

    MS. ELNAGAR: Thank you.  I think we have a Webex question on Sri Lanka too.  Zuflik, if you can please put on your camera.  Here we go.  We cannot hear you. 

    QUESTIONER:  This is from News First Sri Lanka.  My question is to Mr. Srinivasan.  Sri Lanka is currently on a IMF supported program for 48 months.  Is IMF having any long-term support program for Sri Lanka given that the debt restructuring is also in its final stages?  And just 48 hours ago at the G24 press briefing, we had the director of G24 saying that countries like Sri Lanka, the middle-income countries, should also have something similar to a common framework and there should be timely debt reduction measures also in place.  What is the IMF’s position on these two aspects?  Thank you. 

    MS. ELNAGAR: Any other questions on Sri Lanka?  We have a few similar questions that came through the media center.  So we’re going to answer them if we can please.  Krishna and Thomas.  Thank you.  So there is a question from Ceylon Newspaper.  How is the progress of Sri Lanka’s program and when is the third review expected?  So it’s similar to what was asked.  What are the expected dates of releasing the next change?  How can Sri Lanka address post debt restructuring challenges, particularly within loan interest payments starting next year? 

              There is also the Daily Mirror.  He’s asking has the change in the presidency and the likelihood of change of government at the upcoming parliament polls has an impact on the agreement already reached between Sri Lanka and the IMF.  Has there been any move by the new Sri Lankan administration to renegotiate the agreement reached between Sri Lanka and the IMF?  There is also similar questions from Hero News and from — that’s it. 

    MS. SRINIVASAN: Thank you.  Quite a few questions.  Let me try to answer all of them. So when the new government took office not too long ago, I led a high level team to Colombo to discuss the to engage with the authorities.  And we had some very, very productive discussions with the new government and the team there.  And the discussions are continuing this week during the Annual Meetings.  Now, there was broad consensus, I would say unanimous consensus, that Sri Lanka, which was tearing at the abyss in 2022, has come a long way in terms of undertaking reforms which have led to some hard won gains, as you can know.  You’ll note that growth has been positive the last four quarters.  Inflation is coming down.  So there is consensus that the new government, you know from the new government that it would like to safeguard and build on the hard won gains under the program. 

              Now, under the program we have elements which address some of the priorities of the new government, including in terms of social protection and so on.  But the details on the program are continuing and they’ll be happening this week in Washington.  And we are encouraged by what we have heard so far and hoping that, you know, we can move fast towards the third review which will come up soon.  Now, in terms of there was a question on the debt restructuring.  They have reached agreements with the official creditors, and they’ve reached an agreement in principle with the private creditors.  The next step would be to reach a formal agreement with all creditors.  And that’s a big step forward.  And of course that’s not the end.  There’s a lot more work to be done in terms of continuing with the reforms because a long way to go before you’re on the path of strong and sustainable recovery. 

              In terms of the macro linked bonds, this is something which is a negotiation between the country’s creditors, the country’s advisors and the creditors.  We don’t get involved in the kind of instruments that they negotiate on and so on and so forth.  What we are concerned about is whether these instruments and the restructuring they reach are one consistent with our program targets on debt and so on, and that there’s comparability of treatment across creditors.  So that’s something which the country works on.  Now you’re right that these macro linked bonds have become popular.  And so, you know, it all depends, country to country, how the creditors and advisors go about it.  So it’s not for me to say that this is going to be the future of all debt restructuring.  It varies from country to country.  We’ve seen plain vanilla bonds being exchanged and you have these kind of bonds in other countries. 

              Now there was one question on specific tax measures there.  I mean that I don’t want to go to the detail because those are things being worked out in the context of discussions which are ongoing right now.  Hopefully, you know, we’ll move along these negotiations over the next few weeks in a more targeted way.  Thank you. 

    MS. ELNAGAR: Thank you.  I know that there is someone online, but let’s have the lady here. 

    QUESTIONER:  Given that you — I’m Natha Goonawarra from the Standard Thailand.  Given that you mentioned a lot about trade fragmentation and trade tension, especially between the US and China, and I’m from Thailand and Southeast Asia.  So what is your recommendation or your insight on how Southeast Asia and Thailand navigate this global economic challenge this year and what are the most influential factor in the coming years? 

    MS. SRINIVASAN: Thank you.  I’ll have Thomas answer that question. 

    MR. HELBLING: So, the ASEAN countries like Thailand are very strongly integrated into the global economy.  Rising trade integration has been an important engine for growth in the region.  So what we have seen so far, as Krishna mentioned earlier, there’s two developments.  One is the global picture of increasing trade tensions and increasing trade fragmentation.  In a sense, it’s a strong negative for the global economy as a whole.  Global growth will be relatively lower compared to a situation with no or fewer tensions.  Real incomes and productivity will be lower.  On the ASEAN side, a number of countries, including Thailand, have had some trade diversion benefits.  It’s also true for Vietnam for example, or Malaysia.  So that is some benefits.  But our view has been that on net it’s still a negative also for the countries in the ASEAN. 

              So therefore we think the countries in the ASEAN should make a strong push for a continued, strong multilateral trading system for further trade integration.  We also see scope for further regional trade integration.  Obstacles to trade are still relatively higher in services.  There’s scope there to move forward.  Third, on other policies, we see scope for horizontal structural reforms to prepare the economies for a changing trade landscape, for a trendless landscape where services will be relatively more important.  Krishna also mentioned already the importance of education and upskilling the labor force to prepare them for changes.  And then thirdly, maintaining macroeconomic stability.  In particular also having a flexible exchange rate regime that serves as a buffer to external shocks will be important. 

    MS. ELNAGAR: Thank you.  Thank you, Thomas.  We’re going to go online again because we have the gentleman.  Saiful, can you please put on your camera?  I have his question, but I think he cannot connect.  He’s asking about Bangladesh.  The IMF has lowered down GDP growth projection for Bangladesh to 4.5 percent for FY25 from April projections of 6.6 percent.  What are the reasons behind the downgrading?  Does the IMF have any plan to grant additional 3 billion budget support as sought by the interim government of Bangladesh?  Any other questions on Bangladesh? 

    MS. SRINIVASAN: Thank you.  Again.  The reason for our revising down our growth forecast is in response to what we saw in the events in the recent past.  So things have slowed down compared to what we saw previously in the April forecast.  And so those developments give us a pause in terms of what’s happened to growth.  There was a mission led by our mission chief, Chris Papadakis to Bangladesh, which looked at all aspects of what’s happening to the economy.  Based on that, we revised on a growth forecast.  In the case of Bangladesh, growth has slowed, inflation remains high, and they were making good progress.  Bangladesh was making good progress under the program.  So discussions are ongoing in terms of the next review.  We had discussions in Bangladesh, in Dhaka, and discussions are continuing in Washington on how to move forward in terms of financing.  All those will be part of the discussion which will take place this week and next.  Thank you. 

    MS. ELNAGAR: Thank you.  We have another online question from CNN Indonesia.  What is Indonesia’s projected economic growth for the coming year and what are the key global risks that Indonesia should anticipate in 2025 to maintain its resilience amid shifting global economic dynamics?  The second question is how are sustainability challenges and climate risks expected to shape the Asia Pacific regions economic performance in 2025?  And what role will climate finance play in helping governments and businesses mitigate these risks while driving sustainable and long term growth? 

    MR. HELBLING: On Indonesia.  Indonesia has enjoyed and is projected to continue enjoy strong robust growth around 5 percent.  In terms of specific numbers, just for this year we have 5 percent and for next year we have 5.1 percent.  In terms of risks, the external risk ask.  I think they’re very similar for Indonesia as they are for other countries in the Asia Pacific region.  An important concern is trade fragmentation or increasing trade fragmentation.  What’s perhaps a bit different for Indonesia is this will play out relatively more through commodity market channels than just through manufacturing channels as elsewhere.  But trade fragmentation is a big risk.  And as for other emerging market regions in the Asia Pacific or elsewhere, possible shifts in monetary policy expectations, increased financial market volatility also pose some downside risks. 

    MS. ELNAGAR: Thank you.  We have one last question online on the Pacific Islands Pacific region.  It’s by Ben Westcott from Bloomberg.  Given the increasing economic pressures and climate challenges facing Pacific Islands, Pacific Island nations, how does the IMF assess the current trajectory of debt burdens in the region?  Are these debts shrinking or growing?  And what factors are contributing to this trend? 

    MS. SRINIVASAN: Thank you, Randa.  Now, with the deterioration of fiscal balances during the pandemic, public debt did increase on average in the Pacific island countries.  In most countries, however, it has now stabilized or is falling relative to the size of the economies.  Now, that said, seven out of 12 countries in the Pacific islands are considered to be at high risk of debt distress and only about 5 are considered to be at moderate risk of debt distress.  So this goes to the issue of the fact that there needs to be growth friendly fiscal consolidation to bring down debt in these countries.  Of course, these countries also face a challenge of the risks associated with climate change and so there is pressure on them to borrow to address these challenges.  But again, we would emphasize that given where they are with their debt levels and so on, it’s prudent, it’s very important for them to access concessional financing or even grants to make sure that when they address these longer term challenges that they do that in a prudent way so that debt doesn’t become too much, doesn’t become more onerous than it is right now. 

              Now, on the issue of debt, this is not just limited to Pacific Island countries.  What we have seen is since the global financial crisis, public debt has been rising across most countries in Asia.  And so the issue of growth friendly consolidation is very important.  And like I said in my opening remarks, consolidation, fiscal consolidation needs to begin in earnest in many of these countries.  For some countries there could be, there may be a need to provide some support in the near term.  But beyond that, all countries in Asia need to embark on fiscal consolidation, which is growth friendly. 

    MS. ELNAGAR: Thank you very much.  Thank you Krishna and Thomas for giving us the time and answering all the questions.  And we come now to the end of our press briefing.  I just want to remind everyone that you can find all the briefing material and the transcript on IMF.org.  I would also like to remind you that the full release of the Regional Economic Outlook of the Asia Pacific Department is going to be released in Tokyo on November 1st, as Krishna mentioned in his opening remarks.  So we look forward to seeing you online or in person there.  I also would like to remind you that we have regional briefings today in this room for MCD just after this and then after that for the European Department.  Thank you very much and have a wonderful day. 

    *  *  *  *  *

    IMF Communications Department
    MEDIA RELATIONS

    PRESS OFFICER: Randa Elnagar

    Phone: +1 202 623-7100Email: MEDIA@IMF.org

    @IMFSpokesperson

    MIL OSI Economics –

    January 25, 2025
  • MIL-Evening Report: Queensland election signals both major parties accept pumped hydro and the renewable energy transition as inevitable

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Jamie Pittock, Professor, Fenner School of Environment & Society, Australian National University

    Sirbatch/Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA

    Solar and wind have won the global energy race. They accounted for 80% of new global power capacity installed in 2023. In Australia, 99% of new capacity is wind or solar.

    The Queensland election campaign suggests both sides of politics have embraced the renewable energy transition. But solar and wind are variable and need energy storage. That is where pumped hydro energy storage and batteries come in.

    Both are off-the-shelf technologies. And both are already being used on a vast scale.

    Having promised 80% renewable energy by 2035, the incumbent Labor government is committed to large pumped hydro systems at Borumba, on the Sunshine Coast, and Pioneer-Burdekin, near Mackay. The A$14.2 billion Borumba project appears to have support from both major parties. However, the Liberal National Party (LNP) says it will scrap the $12 billion Pioneer Burdekin project and the renewables target if elected.

    While Pioneer-Burdekin is a very good site, there are good alternatives. The LNP says it “will investigate opportunities for smaller, more manageable pumped hydro projects”. Regardless, in supporting more pumped hydro storage and rejecting the federal Coalition’s nuclear power plans, the state LNP is accepting the renewable energy transformation as inevitable.

    What is pumped hydro energy storage?

    Pumped hydro systems store surplus electricity from solar and wind on sunny and windy days. The electricity is used to pump water from a lower reservoir to an upper reservoir. This water can later be released downhill though turbines to generate power when it’s needed.


    ARENA, CC BY

    This proven technology has been used for over a century. It accounts for about 90% of global energy storage. Australia has three pumped hydro systems (Tumut 3, Kangaroo Valley, Wivenhoe) and two under construction (Snowy 2.0 and Kidston).

    Snowy 2.0 will last for at least 100 years. Its capacity (350 gigawatt-hours, GWh) is equivalent to 6 million electric vehicle batteries. It’s enough to power 3 million homes for a week.

    Due to start operating in 2028, Snowy 2.0 will cost about $12 billion. That’s roughly equivalent to $2,000 for a 100-year-lifetime EV battery. Pumped hydro energy storage is cheap!

    ANU’s RE100 Group has published global atlases of about 800,000 potential pumped hydro sites. None require new dams on rivers. Some are new sites (greenfield). Others would use existing reservoirs (bluefield) or old mines (brownfield).

    What about batteries?

    Batteries are best for short-term storage (a few hours). Pumped hydro is better for overnight or several days – Snowy 2.0 will provide 150 hours of storage.

    A combination of these storage systems is better than either alone.

    As with any major infrastructure, pumped hydro development has costs and risks. It has high upfront capital costs but very low operating costs.

    What are Queensland’s options?

    In Queensland, solar and wind electricity rose from 2% to 26% of total generation over the past decade. It’s heading for about 75% in 2030 as part of Australia’s 82% renewables target.

    Queensland needs roughly 150 GWh of extra storage for full decarbonisation. After accounting for Borumba (50 GWh), batteries and other storage, Pioneer-Burdekin (120 GWh) would meet that need.

    A similarly sized system or several smaller systems would also suffice. The latter approach has advantages of decentralisation but would cost more and have environmental impacts in more places.

    The state has thousands of potential sites that are “off-river” (do not require new dams on rivers). The table below shows 15 premium sites, most with capacities of 50–150 GWh. Some larger sizes are included for interest – 5,000 GWh would store enough energy for 100 million people.

    The key technical parameters are:

    • head: the altitude difference between the two reservoirs – bigger is better
    • slope: the ratio of the head to the distance between the reservoirs – larger slope means shorter tunnel
    • W/R: the volume of stored water (W) divided by the volume of rock (R) needed for the reservoir walls. Large W/R means low-cost reservoirs.

    Clicking on each name takes you to a view of the site with more details.

    Site Size (GWh) Type Head (m) Slope (%) W/R
    Mackay 50 Green 800 13 8
    Townsville 50 Green 490 8 19
    Pentland 50 Green 340 6 10
    Boyne 50 Green 390 8 14
    Beechmont 50 Blue 427 6 8
    Tully 50 Blue 726 10 9
    Tully 150 Blue 726 11 5
    Townsville 150 Green 440 8 14
    Mackay 150 Green 412 6 17
    Mackay 150 Green 680 9 7
    Yeppoon 150 Green 390 8 17
    Proserpine 500 Green 600 12 7
    Townsville 500 Green 490 18 6
    Ingham 1,500 Green 650 6 8
    Ingham 5,000 Green 650 7 3

    Pumped storage in far north Queensland is valuable because it can absorb solar and wind energy from the Copperstring transmission extension to Mt Isa. It can then send it down the transmission line to Brisbane at off-peak times. This will ensure the line mostly operates close to full capacity.

    Two potential premium 150 GWh bluefield pumped hydro energy storage systems near Tully.
    Author provided/RE100

    What about the rest of Australia?

    Pumped storage and batteries keep the lights on during solar and wind energy droughts that occasionally occur in winter in southern Australia. They also meet evening peak demand.

    The fossil fuel lobby argues gas is needed in the energy transition. But pumped hydro and battery storage eliminate the need for gas generators and their greenhouse gas emissions.

    In the past decade, solar and wind generation in Australia’s National Electricity Market increased from 6% to 35%. Gas fell from 12% to 5%.

    Most pumped hydro projects can be built off rivers. The same water is repeatedly transferred between the reservoirs. This means the system keeps running during droughts and avoids the impacts of new dams blocking rivers and flooding valleys.

    The environmental and social impacts of off-river pumped hydro projects are much lower than for conventional hydropower or fossil fuel projects.

    The system uses very common materials, primarily water, rock, concrete and steel. Very little land is flooded for off-river pumped hydro to support a 100% renewable energy system: about 3 square metres per person. Only about 3 litres of water per person per day is needed for the initial fill and to replace evaporation.

    Sometimes, safely disposing of tunnel spoil is a challenge – as with mining (including for coal and battery metals). Any major new generation facility and its transmission lines may involve clearing and disturbing bushland. Local communities sometimes oppose pumped hydro developments.

    In Australia, ANU identified 5,500 potential sites. Only one to two dozen are needed to enable the nation to be fully powered by renewables.

    About a dozen pumped hydro projects are in detailed planning. Hydro Tasmania’s Battery of the Nation is proposed for Cethana. Other prominent projects include Oven Mountain, Central West, Upper Hunter Hydro and Burragorang in New South Wales.

    You can expect to see more pumped hydro systems in a state near you.

    Jamie Pittock receives funding from the Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade to provide technical assistance for the development of pumped storage hydropower to aid the transition to renewable energy for governments and others in Asia. He holds governance and advisory roles with a number of non-government environmental organisations.

    Andrew Blakers receives funding from the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade

    – ref. Queensland election signals both major parties accept pumped hydro and the renewable energy transition as inevitable – https://theconversation.com/queensland-election-signals-both-major-parties-accept-pumped-hydro-and-the-renewable-energy-transition-as-inevitable-229611

    MIL OSI Analysis – EveningReport.nz –

    January 25, 2025
←Previous Page
1 … 1,639 1,640 1,641 1,642 1,643 … 1,899
Next Page→
NewzIntel.com

NewzIntel.com

MIL Open Source Intelligence

  • Blog
  • About
  • FAQs
  • Authors
  • Events
  • Shop
  • Patterns
  • Themes

Twenty Twenty-Five

Designed with WordPress