Category: Politics

  • MIL-OSI Security: Mississippi Father and Son Convicted of Felony and Misdemeanor Charges for Actions During January 6 Capitol Breach

    Source: Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) State Crime Alerts (c)

                WASHINGTON – A father and son from Mississippi were convicted of felony and misdemeanor charges related to their conduct during the Jan. 6, 2021, breach of the U.S. Capitol. Their actions and the actions of others disrupted a joint session of the U.S. Congress convened to ascertain and count the electoral votes related to the 2020 presidential election.

                Toney Sheldon Bray, 46, and Ethan Bray, 25, both of Blue Springs, Mississippi, were found guilty on Oct. 4, 2024, of a felony charge of civil disorder and a misdemeanor charge of disorderly and disruptive conduct in a restricted building or grounds following a bench trial before by U.S. District Judge Rudolph Contreras.

                Prior to trial, Toney Bray entered an open guilty plea to three misdemeanor counts of theft of government property, entering and remaining in a restricted building or grounds, and parading, demonstrating, or picketing in a Capitol building. Ethan Bray pled guilty to two misdemeanor counts of entering and remaining in a restricted building or grounds and parading, demonstrating, or picketing in a Capitol building.

                Judge Contreras will sentence the two men on Feb. 7, 2025.

                According to evidence presented during the trial, on Jan. 6, 2021, the defendants dressed in military-style gear, including tactical helmets, vests, and goggles, and were part of the initial breach of police barricades at approximately 12:53 p.m. at Peace Circle, located at Pennsylvania Avenue NW and First Street NW. Specifically, Ethan and Tony Bray pushed and climbed over the police barriers.

                As the Brays and other rioters approached the first set of barricades, “AREA CLOSED” signs were affixed to the barriers. The Brays were among the first to confront law enforcement on the staircase under scaffolding leading from the West Plaza to the Lower West Terrace. They entered the U.S. Capitol Building at approximately 2:22 p.m. through the Senate Wing Door and moved toward the Crypt, as captured on Capitol CCTV footage. At the time they entered the Capitol, the Brays were wearing gas masks.

                The Brays were captured on CCTV in the Crypt at approximately 2:24 p.m. After exiting the Crypt, the Brays moved to the Rotunda, where they were again captured in an open-source photo and Capitol CCTV at approximately 2:36 p.m. While inside, the Brays joined a group of rioters who confronted a line of police officers in a hallway that led to the Senate Chamber.  The rioters engaged in a concerted push against police, and were rebuffed when police used OC spray to push them back.  After moving between the hallway and the Rotunda for some time, the Brays ultimately exited through the Rotunda doors leading to the East Front of the Capitol at approximately 2:54 p.m.

                In total, the Brays were inside the Capitol from approximately 2:22 p.m. until 2:54 p.m., for a total of 32 minutes. After leaving the Rotunda, open-source and Capitol CCTV footage captured Toney Bray carrying a U.S. Capitol Police riot shield. The elder Bray still had the shield after exiting the Capitol building.

                The FBI arrested the two men on June 8, 2023.

                This case is being prosecuted by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia and the Department of Justice National Security Division’s Counterterrorism Section. Valuable assistance was provided by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of Mississippi.

                The case is being investigated by the FBI’s Jackson and Washington Field Offices. Valuable assistance was provided by the U.S. Capitol Police and the Metropolitan Police Department.

                In the 45 months since Jan. 6, 2021, more than 1,532 individuals have been charged in nearly all 50 states for crimes related to the breach of the U.S. Capitol, including more than 571 individuals charged with assaulting or impeding law enforcement, a felony. The investigation remains ongoing.

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI USA: Department of Environmental Quality Secretary Mary Penny Kelley

    Source: US State of North Carolina

    Headline: Department of Environmental Quality Secretary Mary Penny Kelley

    Department of Environmental Quality Secretary Mary Penny Kelley
    mseets

    Today, Governor Roy Cooper announced Boards and Commissions appointments.

    Gov. Cooper has appointed the following individuals to the Governor’s Advisory Council on Aging:

    • Adrienne A. Livengood of Winston Salem as a member at-large. Livengood previously served on the Senior Services Board and the Family Services of Forsyth County Board. Livengood has dedicated her time to raising awareness for senior care accessibility.
    • Debra A. Stonecipher of Asheville as a member at-large. Stonecipher is a former Boeing Executive and owner of the Knight House. Stonecipher’s advocacy for families with aging parents led her to participate in the Mayo Aging and Alzheimer’s Study; allowing her to further assist in research efforts to find a cure for the disease.

    Gov. Cooper has appointed the following individuals to the North Carolina Arts Council:

    • Susan W. Woodson of Raleigh as a member at-large. Woodson is an Artist at 5 Points Art Gallery. She has over 30 years of experience in graphic design and founded the Roundabout Art Collective in Raleigh. She is an active member of Moondog Fine Arts.
    • Dr. Paul Keith Baker of Raleigh as a member at-large. Dr. Baker is the Executive Director of the Contemporary Art Museum of Raleigh and a Professor of History at North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University. Dr. Baker also has ample experience with program development and higher education.
    • Dr. William Henry Curry of Raleigh as a member at-large. Dr. Curry is the Music Director of the Durham Symphony Orchestra. He also has several years of experience as the Resident Conductor and Artistic Director of the North Carolina Symphony.

    Gov. Cooper has appointed the following individual to the North Carolina Auctioneers Commission:

    • John M. Harris of Winston-Salem as a member by the Governor’s discretion. Harris is a Principal Attorney at J. Harris Legal PLLC. He has over nine years of extensive law and government experience.

    Gov. Cooper has appointed the following individual to the Bald Head Island Transportation Authority Board of Trustees:

    • Joseph Patrick Hatem of Southport as a member at-large. Hatem is a native North Carolina resident who served as the Mayor of Southport from 2019 to 2023. He has experience as an Emergency Physician and as the Chairman of the Department of Medicine for J. Arthur Dosher Memorial Hospital.

    Gov. Cooper has appointed the following individual to the North Carolina Employment Security Board of Review:

    • Adam Lockhart Taylor of Raleigh as a representative of employers. Taylor was the Director of Governmental Relations for the North Carolina Office of State Human Resources. His wealth of experience afforded him the opportunity to serve as Chief Deputy and later Assistant Secretary of the Division of Employment Security (DES) before serving as Senior Policy Advisor to the Department of Commerce Division of Workforce Solutions.

    Gov. Cooper has appointed the following individual to the North Carolina Advisory Committee on Cancer Coordination and Control:

    • Melissa H. Smith of Wake as the North Carolina community college system representative. Smith is the Senior State Director of Health Science Programs for the NC Community College System. She previously served as the Dean of Health Sciences at Caldwell Community College and Technical Institute.

    Gov. Cooper has appointed the following individual to the Disciplinary Hearing Commission of the North Carolina State Bar:

    • Scarlett Hargis of Garner as a public member. Hargis serves as a Paralegal to the General Counsel in the Office of the Governor and has been in this role since 2017. Prior to this, she was the Administrative Officer for the Attorney General in the North Carolina Department of Justice.

    Gov. Cooper has appointed the following individual to the North Carolina Council on Educational Services for Exceptional Children:

    • Dr. Bradley S. Stevenson of Charlotte as a representative of a private school. Dr. Stevenson is the Director of Program Administration and Clinical Services of Melmark Carolinas. Dr. Stevenson has experience working as a Behavior Analyst, a Senior Consultant, and an Educational and Behavior Consultant.

    Gov. Cooper has appointed the following individual to the North Carolina Hearing Aid Dealers and Fitters Licensing Board:

    • Anne Morgan Selleck of Durham as a physician preferably specializing in the field of Otolaryngology. Selleck is a Clinical Assistant Professor at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. She has experience as a research coordinator and has a subspecialty certificate in Neurotology.

    Gov. Cooper has appointed the following individual to the Historic Murfreesboro Commission:

    • Craig Lee Dennis of Murfreesboro as a member at-large. Dennis is an art teacher at Riverview Elementary School. He also serves as a Murfreesboro Town Councilman and Fire Commissioner. Additionally, Dennis spends his time as a volunteer for the Murfreesboro Historical Association and serves as the Landscape Committee Chair of the John Wheeler House.

    Gov. Cooper has appointed the following individual to the North Carolina State Historical Records Advisory Board:

    • Melissa A. Lovell of Holly Springs as a member at-large. Lovell has over twenty-five years of experience as a Legal Services Practice Manager and Agency Legal Specialist for the North Carolina Department of Justice.

    Gov. Cooper has appointed the following individual to the North Carolina Human Relations Commission:

    • Kerry M. Wiggins of Winston-Salem as a member at-large. Wiggins is the Boards and Commissions Program Director of the North Carolina League of Conservation Voters Foundation. Previously, Wiggins was a patient advocate at Old Vineyard Behavior Health Services.

    Gov. Cooper has appointed the following individual to the North Carolina Locksmith Licensing Board:

    • Erich Crouch of Greensboro as a public member. Crouch is a former Probation Officer with the North Carolina Department of Adult Corrections, serving the department for 27 years. He has a certification in Homeland Security and ample experience in safety training.

    Gov. Cooper has appointed the following individuals to the North Carolina Commission for Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities and Substance Abuse Services:

    • Carolyn Floyd Robinson of Lumberton as a substance abuse services consumer or an immediate family member of a substance abuse services consumer. Robinson is the Program Director of Borderbelt Behavioral Healthcare LLC and has worked as a substance abuse professional for over 22 years.
    • Dr. Hany A. Kaoud of Winterville as a physician. Dr. Kaoud is the Medical Director and Psychiatrist at Easterseals PORT Health. Prior to this, he was an attending physician at Wayne UNC Health Care and a Research Assistant at California State University.
    • Danny Ray Graves of Charlotte as a member who is a substance abuse services professional. Graves is the Director of Clinical Supervision for the McLeod Addictive Disease Center. He is a certified Clinical Addictions Specialist and a certified Substance Abuse Counselor.
    • Suzanne Mizsur-Porter of Rutherfordton as a substance abuse services family member. Mizsur-Porter is the Executive Director of United Way of Rutherford County. She also served as Creative Director for EMSI Public Relations.
    • Karon F. Johnson of Durham as a developmental disability’s family member. Johnson is a Clinical Assistant Professor at the School of Social Work at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. She is the owner of a Private Therapy Practice and has experience working within the Crisis Unit at the Chapel Hill Police Department.

    Gov. Cooper has appointed the following individual to the Martin Luther King, Jr. Commission:

    • Mildred Christmas of Raleigh as a member at-large. Christmas spent over 17 years as a State Procurement Specialist in the Department of Administration. She also served as the Records Management Analyst for the State Records Center in the Department of Cultural Resources for 14 years.

    Gov. Cooper has appointed the following individual to the NCWorks Commission:

    • Rebecca Irene Axford of Hillsborough as a workforce representative/labor representative. Axford is the International Representative for the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Education Department for the state of North Carolina.

    Gov. Cooper has appointed the following individual to the North Carolina State Board of Examiners for Plumbing, Heating and Fire Sprinkler Contractors:

    • Jeffrey Clark Farlow of Greensboro as a plumbing contractor. Farlow is the Executive Vice President at InfraPros, LLC. Farlow is an established leader for Facility Automation and Operations. He has been recognized for guiding the company in Green Building Technology and awarded the Distech Controls International Green Building Award for innovation and work in energy-saving strategies.

    Gov. Cooper has appointed the following individual to the North Carolina Private Protective Services Board:

    • David E. Poston of Shelby as a member who is licensed under 74C-4. Poston is a former Patrol Deputy and Polygraphist/Background Investigator for Clay County’s Sheriff’s Office. He is a licensed private investigator and polygraph examiner who concentrates on defendant criminal case review and pre-trial polygraph testing, employee theft, espionage, and sabotage, as well as pre-employment and family advocacy.

    Gov. Cooper has appointed the following individuals to the North Carolina Real Estate Commission:

    • Patrick H. Bell of Raleigh as a licensed real estate broker. Bell is the Vice President of Land Acquisition Carolinas for The Kolter Group and serves as a board member on eight homeowner associations. He is also a former land acquisition manager and commercial real estate broker.
    • Melvin Alston of Greensboro as a licensed real estate broker. Alston is the President of Alston Realty Group, Inc. He is also the Guilford County Commissioner Board Chair, representing district 8.

    Gov. Cooper has appointed the following individual to the North Carolina Council on Sickle Cell Syndrome:

    • The Honorable Gladys A. Robinson of Raleigh as a member at-large. Senator Robinson is the Deputy Minority Leader of the North Carolina Senate for the State of North Carolina. Senator Robinson also serves on the Southern Regional Education Board.

    Gov. Cooper has appointed the following individuals to the Supplemental Retirement Board of Trustees:

    • Rajinder Singh of Cary as a member experienced in finance and investments. Singh has held various roles as a Global Financial Services Executive throughout his 25-year career. Singh also serves as a director on the boards of Sagen Canada, India Mortgage Guarantee Corporation, and Appalachian Trail Conservancy.
    • Lanier T. McRee of Raleigh as a member experienced in finance and investment who is also a state employee. McRee works as the Assistant State Budget Officer for the North Carolina Office of State Budget and Management. Previously, McRee worked as the principal budget analyst for the North Carolina General Assembly.

    Gov. Cooper has appointed the following individual to the North Carolina Commission on Volunteerism and Community Service:

    • Samantha C. Arrington Sliney of Whispering Pines as a member who is a representative of the military or veterans. Sliney is an attorney advisor for the Department of the Army- Joint Operations Command. She also serves as defense counsel for the New Jersey Air National Guard. Sliney also advocates and leads the Department of the Air Force Women’s Initiatives Team as their Co-Chair.

    ###

    Oct 9, 2024

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Mersen Workers in Columbia, Tennessee, Overwhelmingly Vote to Join IUE-CWA Union, Marking a Major Step Toward Worker Power in Advance Materials Industry

    Source: Communications Workers of America

    Columbia, Tenn. — In a decisive vote, workers at Mersen’s Columbia, Tenn., plant—part of the French multinational conglomerate specializing in electrical power and advanced materials—have overwhelmingly chosen to join the Industrial Division of the Communications Workers of America (IUE-CWA). The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) election concluded with a 39-13 vote in favor of unionization late on Monday evening, while four additional ballots remain contested. This win represents a critical moment for the 60 full-time employees, who aim to address low wages, safety concerns, and a lack of job progression at the facility.

    “We are proud of what we’ve accomplished by standing together to form a union,” said Tracy Jones, a worker involved in the organizing process. “We look forward to working with Mersen to create a safer and more structured workplace and to secure fair wages for everyone.”

    Workers at the Columbia facility raised concerns about the lack of a clear pay structure, highlighting the need for more equitable compensation that reflects the varying levels of skill and responsibility across different roles. Additionally, there are no formal pathways for temporary workers, which the company heavily relies on, to become full-time employees, a situation that has led to frustration among the workforce. Safety issues have also been a major driver of the union effort, with employees reporting frequent incidents and injuries due to the demanding nature of the work, which often involves exposure to high temperatures and workers working far apart in isolation of each other.

    Mersen has experienced significant growth, particularly in the U.S. market. In 2023, the company reported record global sales of €1.21 billion (approximately $1.27 billion USD), with North America contributing €463 million (roughly $486 million USD), driven by strong performance in electric vehicles, renewable energy, and semiconductors. Much of this growth has been supported by U.S. government initiatives like the CHIPS Act and Inflation Reduction Act, which have boosted demand for the advanced materials Mersen supplies.

    The success of the Columbia workers follows a growing trend of unionization in the advanced materials manufacturing sector. IUE-CWA has recently organized workers at several other facilities, including MPP in Campbellsburg, Ind., and another Mersen facility in St. Mary’s, Pa., and has seen increased interest from workers across the country in the advanced materials sector.

    “Mersen’s strong financial performance and expansion in high-growth sectors like semiconductors and renewable energy make this moment particularly significant,” said Orvin Caraballo, an IUE-CWA organizer who helped the Mersen workers organize. “As more workers in these industries organize, we are building greater density, which will translate into more worker power and better conditions across the sector.”

    Mersen’s Columbia workers are eager to negotiate a fair contract that addresses these concerns, and they look forward to collaborating with the company to build a safer and more equitable workplace.

    ###

    About CWA: The Communications Workers of America represents working people in telecommunications, customer service, media, airlines, health care, public service and education, manufacturing, tech, and other fields.

    cwa-union.org @cwaunion

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Canada: Address by Minister Joly at the General Debate of the 79th Session of the United Nations General Assembly

    Source: Government of Canada News

    Check against delivery. This speech has been translated in accordance with the Government of Canada’s official languages policy and edited for posting and distribution in accordance with its communications policy.

    September 30, 2024 – New York City, New York

    Check against delivery. This speech has been translated in accordance with the Government of Canada’s official languages policy and edited for posting and distribution in accordance with its communications policy.

    Mr. President, dear colleagues,

    It is an honour for me to speak to you on behalf of Canada and on behalf of Canadians.

    I would like to underscore that I am joining you on the traditional territory of the Lenape people.

    This recognition is important because today in Canada we mark the National Day of Truth and Reconciliation, when we acknowledge and commemorate the Indigenous Peoples who came before us and continue to live here.

    We acknowledge the pain caused by decades of abuse, neglect and racism.

    It is also an opportunity for us to commit to doing better and to righting the wrongs of the past so we can move forward together.

    Rights and freedoms

    Ours is a country based on the rights and freedoms that are enshrined in our constitutional charter.

    A core reason Canada is a prosperous society is that beyond offering the freedom to pursue a better life for you and your family, Canada also provides freedom from the barriers that prevent you from enjoying a better life: freedom from fear, violence, intimidation and discrimination; freedoms that foster a sense of inclusivity and belonging; freedom that protects the vulnerable and builds stronger communities.

    Far too often, though, some of the loudest voices claiming to speak for freedom are the ones trying to redefine that word for their own purposes.

    They claim freedom as an excuse to do as they wish without any regard for the freedom of others.

    That is certainly not how we should define freedom.

    They hide behind the word to tell us everything is broken and to spread disinformation, and they parrot the lines fed to them by those who wish to interfere in our elections and undermine our democracy.

    They weaponize the term “freedom” to further marginalize those in the most vulnerable situations, to justify spreading hate and even to deny people their right to make choices about their own bodies, including limits on reproductive rights.

    At the end of the day, through all the noise, what they really mean to say is: freedom for some—but not freedom for all.

    Often, the people who claim to speak for freedom are the same people who want the government to decide who people can love, who they are or even what they can wear.

    We see it in our country. We see it around the world. At the international level, we see it when groups or countries declare that international law doesn’t apply to them.

    Afghanistan

    In Afghanistan, we see it taken to its extreme as the Taliban continue to impose inhumane rules against women and girls, banning them from being in public so they are invisible, robbing young girls of the fundamental right to an education.

    How is that respecting human dignity? How is that protecting the best interests of their people?

    They must be held accountable.

    Last week, Canada joined Australia, Germany and the Netherlands, with the support of 22 other countries, to take steps to hold Afghanistan accountable under the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women.

    The Taliban cannot make international law disappear through simple decrees.

    Canada is a country that values freedom from oppression, not the freedom to oppress others.

    There should be nothing controversial about protecting human rights, including the dignity of all men and women.

    Haiti

    With regard to Haiti, the world cannot sit idly by as people suffer.

    Unchecked gang violence and corruption in Haiti have created a catastrophe for the population, which is plunged into a state of deep insecurity in which civilians fall victim to bullets and children die of hunger.

    Canada has always maintained that the solution to this crisis must come from Haitians for the benefit of Haitians.

    To this end, the Transitional Presidential Council and the transitional government are working to restore order, but they cannot do it alone.

    The Haitian people need a multinational security support mission to work with the Haitian National Police, not only to help them restore order but also to meet the basic needs of the population.

    That’s why Canada has invested more than $100 million to support it.

    Canada is doing its part.

    We must all show the Haitian people that we are not going to abandon them.

    The United Nations Security Council must be clear on this.

    I would like to thank CARICOM and Kenya for the essential role they are playing in the response to this crisis.

    Together, we can achieve lasting peace and stability in Haiti.

    Middle East

    Mr. President, what is happening in the Middle East is an unspeakable tragedy. Thousands have been killed in Israel, Gaza and Lebanon, including many Canadians.

    This is a senseless war that goes against the dignity of human beings. The suffering —on all sides—must end.

    What the world continues to witness is a repeated cycle of violence where civilians pay the heaviest price.

    Canada is joining those urging Israel and Hezbollah to accept an immediate ceasefire. We need to create space for peace talks and save lives.

    There cannot be war in Lebanon—full stop. UN Security Council resolutions must be respected.

    Families in Southern Lebanon and families in Northern Israel must be able to safely return to their homes. We have and always will insist that civilians be protected, wherever they’re from.

    Next week, we mark 1 year since the terrorist attacks by Hamas against Israel.

    Last March, I visited Kibbutz Kfar Aza, one of the communities attacked on October 7, 2023. I met Ayalet, a mother grieving for her son, who was brutally murdered in the attack; he died protecting his fiancée. Ayalet recounted the terror of that day, the search for loved ones in burned homes.

    As she spoke about the horrors of October 7, we heard the bombs, as they landed on Gaza nearby, and felt the ground shudder. In that moment, our sense of [MM1] the duality of the tragedy befalling the Israeli and Palestinian people was profound. It is a moment I will never forget.

    The situation in Gaza is inhumane. The level of suffering is unacceptable. It must stop. Innocent Palestinians, including [MM2] women and children, cannot pay the price of defeating Hamas. This must end.

    A ceasefire is needed immediately. The hostages [MM3] must be released. This requires both sides making real efforts.

    Mr. President: for lasting peace, Canada has long advocated for a 2-state solution. We believe both Israelis and Palestinians have the right to exist.

    We all know a negotiated agreement is the best chance for Israelis and Palestinians to live side by side in peace and security.

    Unfortunately, Hamas, a terrorist organization, continues to operate in Gaza, refuses to release hostages and refuses to lay down its weapons.

    Meanwhile, the Government of Israel is against the creation of a Palestinian state. Violence against Palestinians by extremist settlers and expansion of settlements by Israel in the West Bank continue unabated. This is unacceptable.

    Canada supports the creation of a Palestinian state.

    That is why we are providing security and development support to the Palestinian people. We will officially recognize the state of Palestine at the right time: when it is most conducive to building a lasting peace and not necessarily as the last step of a negotiated process.

    More than anything, this conflict has led to unspeakable pain. Communities are hurting.

    People have the right to protest peacefully. But nobody has the freedom [MM4] to intimidate others. Polarization is a problem. Division is real.

    We have a collective responsibility to bring people together.

    Ukraine

    Mr. President, it has now been 2 and a half years since Russia launched its illegal invasion of Ukraine. The human cost continues to grow.

    No country has the freedom [MM5] to invade its neighbour. There’s no freedom [MM6] to impose your will on others. This aggression is a blatant violation of the UN Charter.

    Russia needs to get out of Ukraine now.

    The Ukrainian people have the right to be free from fear, free from aggression. They have the right to decide what their own future should be.

    Mr. President, we all know that if Russia’s aggression goes unchecked here it will continue. Many countries in the region and the hemisphere are wondering if they will be next. The world must not back down in denouncing this unjustifiable aggression.

    Canada will not back down from its support for Ukraine.

    At the end of October, Canada will host a conference co-organized with Norway and Ukraine on the human dimension of Ukraine’s 10-point peace formula. We will focus on the return of children to their families and of deported civilians and prisoners of war.

    Every one of those affected by this war is entitled to freedom from violence and from being forced from their home.

    UN reform

    Mr. President,

    The issues I have just mentioned create immense challenges. This institution has a role to play in helping us to work together toward solutions.

    Critics of the United Nations accuse it of being incapable of solving the problems currently facing the world.

    Worse still, some more conspiratorial critics even believe that the UN is the cause of many of these problems.

    Both ignore the reality and the strength of this organization.

    The United Nations is a unique forum that allows us to come together and talk to each other on an equal footing to try to iron out our differences, which are sometimes profound, through discussion and consensus-building.

    That’s why Canada supported the adoption of the Pact for the Future at the Summit of the Future last week.

    The pact is a starting point as we work together to ensure the sustainability of the organization.

    The UN is not a perfect organization, it is true, but progress is possible. As the Secretary-General has said: “ We can’t build a future for our grandchildren with a system built for our grand[MM7] parents.” Let’s build that future together.

    Mr. President,

    For almost 80 years, no woman has held the post of secretary-general.

    This is unacceptable.

    Last week with my colleague from Jamaica, I had the great honour of welcoming to Toronto 15 women foreign ministers from the 4 corners of the earth.

    Our conclusion was clear. The next head of this illustrious institution must be a woman.

    It’s high time we were able to respectfully say, at this podium and around the world, “Madam Secretary-General.”

    I would say the same for the post of president of the General Assembly.

    Mr. President, with respect, I hope that next year the delegates will address “Madam President.”

    I know that many of us share this wish.

    Mr. President,

    Let me tell you about my mother. She will be so proud that I am talking about her at the United Nations.

    You know, my mother and grandmother are among the millions of women around the world who have fought hard for equal rights.

    They did so alongside the mothers and grandmothers of many of the people in this room.

    Mum recently told me that we were now part of the “consolidation generation.” She’s right.

    Being part of our generation means that we need to consolidate the gains that have been made over time and fight against those who are trying to roll back this progress. It also means that we need to continue to fight so that women and girls everywhere have the right to make choices about their own bodies and their own lives.

    We see the difference the gap in freedoms creates. When women are robbed of the right to decide when to have children, they lose out on education and job opportunities. When women don’t have access to safe abortions their lives are put at risk. When women are denied access to safe contraception and fertility treatments, they lose the power to make choices that have the most profound impacts on their lives.

    Attacks on sexual and reproductive health rights are an attack on equality rights. They’re an affront to basic dignity.

    We must always have the right to choose for ourselves which means of contraception to use, whether to have an abortion or even to choose assisted reproduction. We women have the right to be equal in everything: in education, in employment and in every other opportunity.

    We are women and proud of it.

    We can never turn back.

    Together, we must keep moving forward for our sisters, our daughters and our granddaughters.

    Mr. President, 2 years ago, I stood here and said countries around the world were faced with a choice. And we still have that choice today. We can choose a world where rules can be broken by the powerful, bringing us back to darker times of tension and conflict. Or we can choose a world that upholds human rights, opportunities for all, peace and prosperity; a world where people work together to solve problems.

    Canada will work with partners to move us beyond this moment of crisis.

    A new future is being shaped.

    We must not fail.

    Thank you.

    MIL OSI Canada News

  • MIL-OSI Canada: Manitoba Government Invests More Than $32 Million on Roadway and Area Improvements in Dauphin

    Source: Government of Canada regional news

    Manitoba Government Invests More Than $32 Million on Roadway and Area Improvements in Dauphin


    The Manitoba government’s $32.7-million investment to address improvements along Provincial Trunk Highway (PTH) 5 in the Dauphin area are now open and visible to travellers, Transportation and Infrastructure Minister Lisa Naylor announced today. 

    “These much-needed improvements enhance traffic flow, water diversion and boost the safety and curb appeal of the route for community members and travellers,” said Naylor. “These improvements will make our roads safer and support growing our economy by building important infrastructure that matters to Manitobans, especially in rural Manitoba.” 

    This project consisted of three sections:

    • Intersection improvements, traffic signals and service road construction as well as the reconstruction of PTH 5A including concrete curbing, raised medians, sidewalks, culvert installations, granular subgrade, granular base course and bituminous pavement on 1.8 kilometres from Triangle Road to Whitmore Avenue with a total cost of $21.8 million.
    • Construction of a land drainage and retention pond system for the City of Dauphin, funded by the city. The Manitoba government funded the infrastructure to support this project including approximately 885 meters of underground pipe and two retention ponds, with a total cost of $9.6 million.
    • Construction of a bituminous pavement on a 0.8 km section of PTH 5A in Dauphin from Whitmore Avenue to Fourth Avenue South with a total cost of $1.3 million.

    “This investment marks a significant step forward for the City of Dauphin, enhancing not only the safety and accessibility of our roads but also supporting our growth as a regional hub,” said Mayor David Bosiak, City of Dauphin. “These upgrades to PTH 5A will improve traffic flow and pedestrian safety while fostering economic development for our community and region. We are grateful to the Manitoba government for their commitment to infrastructure, which strengthens both our local economy and our quality of life.”

    The project added service roads on both the east and west sides of PTH 5A. The main lanes of PTH 5A were reconstructed to include a fully divided four-lane cross section, complete with a raised concrete median and traffic signals at the main entrance to the Dauphin Marketplace Mall as well as sidewalks along both service roads to encourage active transportation.

    This work in Dauphin supports Manitoba’s multi-year infrastructure investment strategy, which outlines planned strategic investments in roads, highways, bridges, airports and flood protection over the next five years in Manitoba, noted the minister.

    For more information on Manitoba’s Multi-Year Infrastructure Investment Strategy, visit: http://www.gov.mb.ca/mti/myhis/index.html. 

    Up-to-date information on highway conditions, including detours, restrictions and road closures, is available at http://www.manitoba511.ca/ or by calling 511. 

    – 30 –

    MIL OSI Canada News

  • MIL-OSI Security: Defense News: SECNAV Del Toro As-Written Remarks at the USNS Lucy Stone Christening

    Source: United States Navy

    Introduction/Thank You

    Good morning, everyone!

    It is an honor to be here with you in beautiful San Diego for the christening of our Fleet’s fifth John Lewis-Class replenishment oiler, USNS Lucy Stone (T-AO 209).

    First and foremost, I would like to thank our ship’s sponsors, Alicia and Debbie, for being here today and for their critical roles as ship introduction specialists, uniting ships with their sponsors.

    According to naval tradition, a ship sponsor’s spirit and presence guides the ship and its crew as long as the ship remains in service.

    And I can think of no one more fitting to take on this vital role and for this ship than Alicia Aadnesen and Debbie Simmons.

    Together, Alicia and Debbie have over six decades of service to the Navy, providing expertise and guidance to our ship sponsors, pre-commissioning crews, and ceremony participants in every aspect of Navy surface ship milestone ceremonies.

    They ensure that our Navy and Marine Corps heroes, Medal of Honor recipients, living namesakes, communities, and cities are properly honored in our Fleet.

    And everyone who meets them universally and unequivocally says that they are the two of the kindest people you will ever meet in your life.

    Alicia and Debbie, thank you for your dedication and careers of service to our Sailors, Marines, and civilian mariners.

    Secretary Winter, thank you for your presence today and support of our Navy and Marine Corps.

    President Carver, it is good to see you again. Thank you for your work here in San Diego, helping grow the Fleet our Navy and Marine Corps needs.

    Ms. Stiller, thank you for your leadership as President of the Society of Sponsors and all that you do to ensure our Fleet is warfighting ready.

    To our Navy team and industry representatives: thank you for your unwavering support—today was made possible only by your tireless efforts.

    And to all of our flag officers, general officers, distinguished guests and visitors—welcome and thank you for joining us today.

    USNS Lucy Stone

    Our John Lewis-Class replenishment oilers honor the legacy of our Nation’s champions—those who fought for the rights and fair treatment of all Americans.

    Each of the ships of this class are named for America’s civil rights leaders—men and women who dedicated their lives in service of equality and opportunity for all Americans and embody the soul of our great Nation.

    Lucy Stone, an abolitionist and suffragist, advocated and organized for the promotion of rights for women and the elimination of slavery.

    Alongside other suffragists, she helped establish the National Woman Suffrage Association, a key organization in the fight for women’s right to vote.

    She lived just as she told others to live, striving every day to “make the world better.”

    The enduring legacy of Lucy Stone as a trailblazer in the women’s rights movement remains an indelible source of inspiration today.

    And the John Lewis-Class replenishment oiler represents not only the legacies of these civil rights heroes, but also a tremendous asset to our Fleet and Force, an integral piece to our often complicated yet critical logistics puzzle.

    This is significant, because as you have seen and heard in the news, we face tremendous uncertainty in every part of the globe.

    And the Nation, and indeed the world, relies on the strength of our United States Navy and Marine Corps.

    Our Navy’s global presence is a powerful deterrent, safeguarding our national security interests, our prosperity, and our international allies and partners from any who would do us harm.

    Military Sealift Command

    And in order to maintain sustained operations at sea, our Navy warships rely on Military Sealift Command’s combat logistics fleet.

    Let me now take a moment to recognize our Government Merchant Mariners who crew our MSC ships.

    Despite the challenges posed by a shortfall in its numbers, the MSC continues to fulfill a vital role in supporting our Nation’s logistical readiness.

    I thank our Merchant Mariners for answering our national call to maritime service and for their ongoing efforts to recruit and maintain our critical capabilities.

    It is their vital work and logistical prowess which enables our Navy to project decisive power to scenes of action around the world in peace, crisis, and war.

    When our Sailors and Marines take our warships into combat, our MSC Merchant Mariners are right there with them, bringing the “beans, bullets, and black oil” they need to stay out to sea until the end of conflict.

    Two of our Navy’s most important attributes are our flexibility and our persistence.

    Our Navy’s ability to bring decisive forces to bear anywhere in the world on short notice, and our ability to keep the sea and stay on station until the job is done make all the difference in American strategy—possible only because of the Military Sealift Command.

    One of my near-term priorities is making the fleet we have more formidable with logistical innovations such as Rearm-at-Sea and Modular Refueling, which will expand our ability to sustain our ships on station and deter our adversaries.

    Rear Admiral Henry E. Eccles, the Naval War College’s “Clausewitz of Logistics,” once said: “The essence of flexibility is in the mind of the commander; the substance of flexibility is in logistics.”

    Today, the substance of our Navy’s flexibility is in the ships of the Military Sealift Command—like USNS Lucy Stone—and the intrepid Merchant Mariners who will take her to sea.

    And as Secretary of the Navy, I am dedicated to our mission of building and substantiating the most capable and powerful maritime warfighting force in the world.

    Multi-Ship Procurement

    One year ago, I announced a call for a new Maritime Statecraft to prevail in an era of intense strategic competition.

    Maritime Statecraft encompasses not only naval diplomacy and maritime competition, but a national, whole-of-government effort to build comprehensive U.S. and allied maritime power, both commercial and naval.

    History has shown that no great naval power has long endured without also being a maritime power—a commercial shipbuilding power.

    Our Maritime Statecraft strategy invests in rebuilding the foundations of national seapower to ensure our continued maritime dominance over the near, medium, and long-term horizons.

    We are diligently working to create a new paradigm of genuine market competition, one that leverages the power of dual-use commercial and naval shipbuilding which has proven so successful for our competitors and allies alike.

    One of the most effective tools we have in our current arsenal shipbuilding authorities are block buys.

    And so, I am proud to publicly announce the Department of the Navy is pursuing the award of the T-AO Program Block Buy Contract to procure eight T-AO ships like USNS Lucy Stone.

    This multi-billion-dollar contract reflects innovation to build and sustain our maritime dominance and allows for critical investment and maintenance of our shipbuilding industrial base.

    In turn, this will help ensure stability and jobs for the next decade.

    And the Block Buy will provide significant cost savings to the American taxpayer, demonstrating responsible stewardship of public funds.

    I am proud to make this announcement today alongside our Merchant Mariners and industry partners.

    Your contributions to our shipbuilding industry and logistical readiness are vital to our Maritime Statecraft.

    And your support is essential for the success of our Navy and Marine Corps.

    Closing

    Our Nation’s Maritime services are indeed the most powerful and capable this world has ever seen.

    And I know that we have the best ships, submarines, aircraft, equipment, and weapons.

    But having strong maritime services is about more than just acquiring advanced systems and platforms.

    Our people are the foundation of our maritime force—our Sailors, Marines, civilian mariners, and shipbuilders ensure that American remains the greatest nation in the world.

    Thank you, Alicia and Debbie, for your lifelong commitment to our Navy and civilian mariners, to our service men and women, and to the United States of America.

    You, like the trailblazing woman for whom this ship was named, and our Navy Sailors and civilian mariners on this ship, represent the absolute best this country has to offer.

    May God bless you and our service men and women stationed all around the globe. Thank you.

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Security: Defense News: SECNAV Del Toro As-Written Remarks at the SSN 812 Naming

    Source: United States Navy

    Introduction/Thank You

    Good morning, everyone!

    It is an honor to be with you here today.

    Mayor Scott, thank you for joining us and for your years of public service to the City of Baltimore.

    Thank you, Senator Cardin, for your partnership and support of our service men and women and their families in our Navy and Marine Corps.

    Deputy Secretary of Defense Hicks, ma’am, it is an honor to have you here today. Thank you for your leadership of the Department of Defense and fierce advocacy of our service members and DOD civilians.

    Admiral Holland, thank you for your presence and for your career of service to the Navy Submarine Force.

    To all of our service members, distinguished guests and visitors—welcome and thank you for joining us.

    City of Baltimore

    It is wonderful to be here in Baltimore, Maryland—a city rich in both American and naval history.

    And not only because when I was a Midshipman at the United States Naval Academy, my friends and I would come up to Baltimore to escape Annapolis every once in a while!

    The city of Baltimore maintains a strong connection with our maritime services and is a critical enabler of our National Maritime Statecraft.

    Baltimore boasts a storied shipbuilding history, famously the originator of the “Baltimore Clipper,” an eighteenth-century merchant sailing vessel known for its speed.

    In the early days of our Nation, the city earned a reputation as the center of commerce, and the Port of Baltimore remains one of the busiest in the Nation today.

    And in the wake of tragedy, we come together here in Baltimore.

    Following the collapse of the Francis Scott Key Bridge in March, the Navy worked with Key Bridge Response Unified Command which included the Army Corps of Engineers, Coast Guard, Maryland Department of the Environment, Maryland Transportation Authority, Maryland State Police, and Synergy Marine.

    NAVSEA’s Navy Supervisor of Salvage and Diving led critical efforts to support the clearance of the Port of Baltimore’s Fort McHenry Federal Channel.

    We mourn those we lost on March 26, 2024. Please join me in a moment of silence to honor the memory of the six souls taken too soon from us that day.

    The ship we are on today—USS Constellation—was named after and includes materials from one of our Navy’s six founding frigates, which was built here in Baltimore.

    And it was not far from here that during the Battle of Baltimore in 1814, Francis Scott Key penned the immortal words to “The Star-Spangled Banner,” our national anthem.

    Baltimore has deep roots with our Nation’s Navy and boasts one Continental Navy ship and five previous Navy vessels named for the city including:

    a brigantine,

    a converted merchant ship which served in the Quasi-War against France,

    a sidewheel steamer which served in the Civil War,

    a cruiser which fought in the Battle of Manila Bay during the Spanish-American War and then later in the First World War,

    a Baltimore-class cruiser which earned nine battle stars during the Second World War, and

    most recently, a Los Angeles-class nuclear attack submarine, SSN 704, which participated in undersea operations against the Soviet Union and decommissioned on July 10, 1998.

    Ship Naming

    Baltimore shaped America’s formative years—a strategic location since its very origins and an integral part of the Nation’s thriving shipping and shipbuilding industries.

    Baltimore’s external influence is far reaching—affecting American culture, food, sports, and commerce.

    And now, Ladies and Gentlemen, it is my honor and privilege to announce the name of the next Virginia-class nuclear-powered submarine, SSN EIGHT-TWELVE, USS Baltimore.

    Make ready!

    Sponsor Introduction

    I am also honored to announce that the ship sponsor of the future USS Baltimore is Deputy Secretary of Defense Kathleen Hicks.

    The ship’s sponsor fills a critical role throughout the life of a warship, serving as the bond between the ship, her crew, and the nation they serve.

    And I can think of no one more fitting to take on this vital role—no one with more resilience and grit and whose spirit embodies that of Baltimore—than Deputy Secretary Hicks.

    Since its very founding, the city of Baltimore has introduced new ideas, transforming the Nation and indeed the world.

    And in the Department of Defense, Deputy Secretary Hicks has championed innovation, modernization, and other strategic initiatives aimed at increasing our military’s adaptability, efficiency, and capabilities in the face of emerging global challenges.

    Thank you, ma’am, for your lifelong commitment to our Navy, to our service men and women, and to the United States of America.

    You, like the service members who will serve on this proud ship and the city it will be named after, represent the absolute best this country has to offer.

    Closing/Mayor Scott Introduction

    In closing, our Navy and Marine Corps Team is indeed the most powerful, capable, and lethal Force this world has ever seen.

    And I know that we have the best ships, submarines, aircraft, equipment, and weapons.

    But a strong Navy and Marine Corps is about more than just acquiring advanced systems and platforms.

    Our people are the foundation of this Department—they ensure that America remains the greatest nation in the world and that we remain the land of the free.

    We have the strongest Navy and Marine Corps in the world because of the people onboard ships like the future USS Baltimore.

    May God bless you and our service men and women stationed all around the globe.

    And now, I would like to introduce a community leader, public servant, and lifelong resident of Baltimore City who at the age of twenty-seven was one of the youngest people ever elected to the Baltimore City Council, and at the age of thirty-six was the youngest mayor in Baltimore’s history.

    Ladies and Gentlemen, please welcome the 52nd Mayor of Baltimore, Mayor Brandon Scott.

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Security: Defense News: SECNAV Del Toro As-Written Remarks at the USS New Jersey Commissioning

    Source: United States Navy

    Thank You/Introduction

    Good morning, everyone!

    Admiral Houston, thank you for that kind introduction and for your leadership of our Navy nuclear team.

    It is an absolute honor to be here with all of you today in beautiful New Jersey—the birthplace of the United States Submarine Force—to commission our fleet’s newest Virginia Class submarine, USS New Jersey (SSN 796).

    Mayor Perry, thank you for supporting our service members and their families who are stationed, train, and work here at Naval Weapons Station Earle. And thank you for all you have done to make today possible.

    Governor Murphy, thank you for your presence today and for your advocacy of our maritime services in New Jersey.

    Representative Norcross, Representative Smith, and Representative Pallone, welcome and thank you for your support of our men and women in the armed forces.

    President Boykin and Vice President Runkle, thank you for your partnership building the Navy our Nation needs.

    Dr. DiMarco, on behalf of this crew and our Navy, thank you for serving as ship sponsor for the USS New Jersey.

    In this role, you will forever be the connection between this warship, her crew, and the legacies of so many servicemembers from New Jersey.

    To the crew of USS New Jersey and your families, thank you for your service and sacrifice. Our Navy families shoulder the burdens of our absence, and service in defense of our country is only possible because of the love, support, and sacrifice of our loved ones.

    I am grateful to have had the support of my wife Betty and our four sons throughout my own naval career, a career in business, and now as Secretary of the Navy.

    To the rest of our Navy team, the commissioning committee, and our partners in industry: thank you for your unwavering support—this commissioning was made possible only by your tireless efforts.

    New Jersey and Call to Service

    This modern marvel behind me is the culmination of years of hard work and collaboration amongst government, industry, and the crew.

    The Navy’s newest Virginia-Class Fast Attack Submarine, USS New Jersey, is the third commissioned ship named to honor the contributions and support provided by the state of New Jersey.

    Our Navy’s Submarine Force is formidable—a lethal combination of one of the most powerful platforms available today manned by our Nation’s best and brightest.

    SSN 796 brings tremendous firepower to our Fleet and indeed our Nation—providing our commanders a valuable asset which strengthens our national security.

    And this submarine honors not only the legacy of the ships who bore the name USS New Jersey before her—both battleships.

    The first New Jersey was part of the Great White Fleet and circumnavigated the globe. Following the end of the Great War, USS New Jersey (BB 16) brought our soldiers back home from Europe.

    The second New Jersey was known as the “Big J.”

    She was the most decorated battleship in our Navy’s history—fighting in World War II, the Korean War, and the Vietnam War.

    During her 47-year career, she took part the two largest naval battles in history, the Battles of the Philippine Sea and Leyte Gulf, and supported the invasions of Iwo Jima and Okinawa.

    She received 19 battle and campaign stars, six Navy Unit Commendations, and at least 11 Meritorious Unit Citations.

    This submarine also honors the legacy of the great people from New Jersey.

    Because people—our Sailors and Marines—are our greatest strength, and force resilience and readiness begin and end with them.

    Our Sailors, including those from New Jersey, raised their right hands to support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic.

    In turn, through their willing service and sacrifice, we as Americans wake up every day in a nation which values and protects democracy—a nation which strives every day to become a more perfect Union.

    I thank the future Navy and Marine Corps Officers from Rutgers University who presented the colors for us today.

    These men and women will lead our Sailors and Marines, and some, if they are lucky, may one day even serve on this submarine.

    I am proud to stand here today as we welcome another “player to the field,” manned by an all-volunteer force of Sailors who have dedicated their careers and their lives in service to our Nation.

    And she will honor all those from New Jersey, sailing to protect our freedom from deep below the ocean’s waves.

    Closing

    To the Sailors of the USS New Jersey, you are about to embark on a great adventure as you bring this ship to life.

    On behalf of a grateful nation, thank you all for the work you have already done, for the sacrifices you have already made, and all that you will accomplish in the future.

    May God continue to watch over this ship, her crew, their families, and may they have fair winds and following seas wherever they may sail.

    Thank you.

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Security: Pittsburgh Man Charged with Robbery of Reserve Township Bank

    Source: Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) State Crime Alerts (c)

    PITTSBURGH, Pa. – A resident of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, has been indicted by a federal grand jury in Pittsburgh on a charge of bank robbery, United States Attorney Eric G. Olshan announced today.

    The one-count Indictment named Mark Laughner, 38, as the sole defendant.

    According to the Indictment, on or about May 16, 2024, Laughner entered a Reserve Township bank and, by force, violence, and intimidation, took approximately $1,370 in United States currency from the teller.

    The law provides for a total sentence of up to 20 years in prison, a fine of up to $250,000, or both. Under the federal Sentencing Guidelines, the actual sentence imposed would be based upon the seriousness of the offense and the prior criminal history, if any, of the defendant.

    Assistant United States Attorney V. Joseph Sonson is prosecuting this case on behalf of the government.

    The Allegheny County Police Department and Federal Bureau of Investigation conducted the investigation leading to the Indictment.

    This case is part of Project Safe Neighborhoods (PSN), a program bringing together all levels of law enforcement and the communities they serve to reduce violent crime and gun violence, and to make our neighborhoods safer for everyone. On May 26, 2021, the Department launched a violent crime reduction strategy strengthening PSN based on these core principles: fostering trust and legitimacy in our communities, supporting community-based organizations that help prevent violence from occurring in the first place, setting focused and strategic enforcement priorities, and measuring the results.

    An indictment is an accusation. A defendant is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Securing Cyberspace: Minister Doughty speech

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    Minister Doughty outlined the UK’s commitment to responsible behaviour in cyberspace in a keynote speech at RUSI’s Securing Cyberspace Conference.

    Thank you very much for traveling from near and far. 

    It’s a real pleasure. We’ve got so many leading lights in government, industry, law enforcement, academia and civil society here in one room.  

    And I’m very grateful to RUSI for bringing this together as they so often do.  

    This is a very welcome opportunity to reflect on an important mission for the new government that I’m proud to serve in, and that is, of course, enhancing cyber security and promoting responsible behaviour in cyberspace. 

    You in this room are all of our vital and valid partners in this. 

    And everyone here today has a role to play in shaping the future agenda, bringing diverse perspectives, specialist knowledge and deep expertise. 

    So thank you once again. 

    And I really hope that this conference, which we’ve been proud to support, helps you forge fresh connections and find new ways to collaborate.  

    And we cannot meet at a more pivotal moment in world history – a moment of the most extraordinary change, of risk, and of opportunity. 

    Because from our banks to our electricity grid, from our defence to our hospitals, the online cyber world underpins every aspect of our society. 

    And with every day that passes, we of course, rely on it more for our prosperity and our security. 

    But you hardly need to be told that this brave new world has a dark side -and the years to come will see us walking dangerous and difficult complex paths. 

    And I just reflect in my own life, I got my first email address when I was only 15 or 16 years old.  

    I went to an international school in Canada. It was quite a big chance to connect with some of my classmates from across the world, but my parents were still not used to the system. They were printing out my emails when I sent them home, kept them all in a folder as a physical copy and presented them to me.  

    But today, of course, we’re in that world shaped by Al and quantum, by ever evolving threats and opportunities.  

    And of course, we know that state actors, criminals and others who want to harm us are fighting hard for their share of this space which knows no borders.  

    Those are the threats, but we also have huge opportunities and the question, of course, for all of us is how we embrace the opportunities that cyber brings in every aspect whilst addressing those key challenges. 

    And so I’m grateful for the chance to share some perspectives with you today.  

    I wanted to start by saying that since taking office in July, growth and security have been among the government’s very top priorities and they will remain that way.  

    In a world where we all live and work online, investing in cyber security and promoting responsible behaviour is an essential part of this mission, because fundamentally, and you will all know this, there is no national security, no economic security without cyber security. 

    We cannot fulfil our growth Mission as a government without cyber resilient businesses and supply chains, a Cyber aware workforce and society. 

    And of course, all of those underpinned by strong technical and skills expertise in the cyber sector. 

    This is true for all of us, investing in that security and promoting responsible behaviour has to be a collective endeavour. 

    I wanted to highlight today and reflect on three key themes that will guide our approach as a new government. 

    The first of those is that partnerships are vital for success. 

    When Alan Turing and the codebreakers in Bletchley Park – I have visited and I’m sure many of the you in this room have – they, of course, cracked that Enigma Cipher during the Second World War, sharing those insights with our allies saved countless lives and hastened the end of the war. 

    But of course, today, the world faces a whole new set of threats. 

    Spyware, ransomware, espionage, information manipulation and other forms of interference are causing untold losses and distress to our security and to our economic security.  

    The World Economic Forum estimates that the global cost of cybercrime will reach 24 trillion US dollars by 2027, that’s up from an almost eyewatering 8 trillion in 2022.  

    In the online world, the stakes are higher than ever, and the gloves are well and truly off.  

    So it’s only through solid, respectful, mutual, beneficial partnerships that we can fight back, overcome the challenges we face, and make the most of important opportunities for all our people. 

    It’s a pleasure to see friends from across the diplomatic audience today as well, ready to solve these problems working together with partners and allies across the world.  

    That’s why, from Day One, this new Government has focused on connecting Britain and strengthening relationships with countries around the world, from the Euro-Atlantic to the Global South. 

    That means enhancing our relationships with the EU and our European friends to forge closer cooperation spanning the whole range of issues, including military, economic and cyber, our unshakeable commitment to NATO, the bedrock of our defence. 

    And here I will point out that the UK is playing a leading role in work to deter and respond to cyber threats.  

    And later this year, we will of course host the NATO Cyber Defence conference to galvanize those efforts.  

    We’re also collaborating with many individual countries and partners, for example, in the Western Balkans, a region I’m privileged to know well from many visits.  

    Indeed, in Opposition, I met with young cyber experts in Pristina and discussed their careers, their prospects, and how we can work together as partners.  

    We’re, of course, working together with governments right across the world to bolster defence and counteract threats.  

    And just last month, I was in Moldova where I discussed these issues and partnerships at the Ministry of Defence in Chișinău. 

    And turning to the wider world, particularly our important partnerships in the Global South, our work with Interpol in Africa, across the Indo-Pacific and indeed, Latin America, tackling cybercrime, building closer cross-border partnerships.  

    In Africa, this partnership has helped to smash 20,000 criminal networks and seize illegal funds worth more than 40 million US dollars.  

    Last year, Interpol coordination with cybercrime units in Nigeria, Benin, Cote d’Ivoire saw 300 suspects arrested, 3 million US dollars’ worth of assets ceased and multiple criminal networks dismantled.  

    In the months and years ahead, the UK will continue to play our role at Interpol, an organisation which of course is at the sharp end of the increasingly borderless world of global crime.  

    Secondly, I want to talk about responsible cyber behaviour. 

    In all of our collaborations around the world, we remain committed to the United Nations Framework for Responsible State Behaviour in the use of Information Communication Technologies, but will be guided by our principles when it comes to ensuring safe and responsible use of cyber capabilities. 

    That’s the second important theme of our work overall, and the topic I know you’ll be discussing in detail at this conference, thanks again to RUSI for putting together such a strong and relevant agenda.  

    But for now, I will simply say that for the UK, this is about staying at the forefront of science and technology so we can understand threats and respond appropriately, and helping others do the same. 

    For example, supporting cyber security nonprofit organisations like Shadowserver to share threat data.  

    It’s also about transparency, which is so vital to facilitate cooperation, build trust and reduce the possibility of misinterpretation and escalation.  

    It’s also about inclusion, for example, by bringing stakeholders, including many of you in this room with all their expertise into that global cyber security discussion. A topic I will return to shortly. 

    But it’s also importantly about promoting accountability, because while we here in this room are united in our support for responsible behaviour, we know that not everybody plays by those rules. 

    Sometimes we will need to take firm action, and the UK will continue our important work with partners to hold criminals and others to account.  

    International cooperation is central, as demonstrated in August, when, after significant efforts by many of those in this room, here today, UN member states finalized a new draft Cybercrime Convention.  

    Many of us, of course, have the tools to take domestic action in this area too. 

    Just last week, on 1 October, alongside the United States and Australia, this country sanctioned 16 members of the Russian cybercrime gang, Evil Corp.  

    This group, which truly lives up to its name, has waged a campaign of destructive attacks worldwide for over a decade.  

    They include malware and ransomware attacks against UK health, government and public sector institutions as well as commercial technology companies.  

    Those sanctioned are now subject to asset freezes and travel bans.  

    Alongside our allies, we will continue to crack down on malicious activity and call out criminals like Evil Corp, who seek to underline our prosperity and security.  

    Thirdly, I wanted to stress the importance of a whole of society approach.  

    And as a Member of Parliament, I see how cybercrime, these challenges affect the lives of my constituents on a daily basis, whether it’s in fraud, whether it’s in terrorism, recruitment of individuals. I’ve seen these aspects in the lives of my constituents over the last five years. 

    As this conference demonstrates, we’re taking every opportunity to bring a wide range of expert stakeholders into our work. Because cyber is not, of course, as you all know, just about the technology, it’s about the people who interact with it, people who come from all spheres of society and all parts of the globe 

    That includes those outside the realm of Government, who have huge pools of talent, expertise, innovation and enthusiasm to bring to the table.  

    And we have to make that advantage count through a whole of society approach to cyber. So this government is absolutely committed to work hand in glove with our partners in industry, in the development sector, in academia, in the not-for-profit sector and beyond.  

    And we’ve got an impressive story already to tell here and want to do even more on. Let me just reflect on a few examples. 

    Firstly, as Putin continues to wage an illegal war in Ukraine, we are working with Mandiant, Palo Alto Networks, CloudFlare, BAE systems, along with the government in Kyiv to bolster Ukraine’s resilience to Russian cyber attacks.  

    We’re drawing on world leading expertise from across the public and private sectors to protect Ukraine’s critical infrastructure and vital public services 

    But our partnerships with industry leaders are not just about addressing threats.  

    As the third largest exporter of cyber security services globally, there’s no doubting how important this sector is to our own economy, indeed to all of our economies, we need to stay ahead of the game when it comes to innovation, and as I’ve said, we have huge talent to draw on.  

    We will work with industry to make the most of the opportunities for British businesses, boosting prosperity and sharing our expertise with the world.  

    We’re leading the efforts through our National Cyber Security Centre to test ideas, enhance understanding and to engage with talented individuals from the private sector to shape our approach.  

    Of course, companies also have a crucial role to play in setting out responsible values and principles for their work. We know this is not a straightforward process. 

    So we will work with partners to find solutions to problems like the unregulated market for spyware that’s being used to target journalists and other civil society communities across the globe, violating human rights and ultimately undermining our free and open societies.  

    We’re bringing people together through the Pall Mall process – from states, industry and civil society to tackle the misuse of commercial spyware and other tools.  

    And besides those efforts to turbocharge our economy and shape the rules of the game, we want to work hard to level the playing field for people. 

    We want to be seeing cyber as an inclusive space where everyone can fulfil their potential. 

    That’s why we’re supporting schemes like the Caribbean Experts Fellowship – part of our wide-ranging work with the Commonwealth.  

    That scheme is going to support the brightest minds from across the region to shape the safe and prosperous cyberspace through academic research, opportunities, networking and more.  

    We’re also committed to close the gender gap in cyber because fundamentally, no country can achieve its full potential if it underuses 50% of its resources and talents.  

    And indeed, yesterday, on Ada Lovelace Day, the world celebrated the achievements of women in science, technology, engineering and mathematics, and I want us to celebrate those achievements every day and create fresh opportunities for women in every area of this work.  

    The UK already has some great projects around the world helping smooth the path for a new generation of female cyber experts to make their mark on this world – from our ‘Her Cyber’ project in Albania, which reaches out to girls at an early age through after school clubs and running right through to university level support, to our UN Women in Cyber Fellowship, which is sponsored with partners including Canada, US and Germany, to encourage greater female representation in negotiations in the UN First Committee.  

    So, I’ve gone through three key themes today. I hope they give you some insights to our thinking and direction of travel, as a new government.  

    But to conclude, we are living in a world, as I said at the beginning, that was unimaginable just a few decades ago.  

    It’s a world that’s ripe with opportunity when it comes to cyber, but of course, laden with challenge. 

    I’ve been glad of the opportunity today to be able to set out some of the ways in which the government will make the most of those opportunities, together with you, while meeting challenges head on through partnerships spanning the globe, demonstrating what a responsible approach looks like, and collaborating with those outside the government who have so much to bring to these efforts. 

    That’s how we can ultimately keep our citizens safe, help our economies to flourish, protect our security and stand up for our values.  

    So once again, I want to welcome you all here today to add my support to your efforts today to discuss these important issues, and to give our commitment as a new government to work with all of you as we develop our capabilities to respond to those threats and opportunities in the future.  

    Thank you very much.

    Updates to this page

    Published 9 October 2024

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI USA: UConn Scholars Consider ‘Historic Firsts’ of 2024 Election

    Source: US State of Connecticut

    It’s rare that any particular event can be confidently predicted to be of major historical significance before it happens, but American presidential elections definitely fit the bill. And while all presidential elections are momentous, each one has unique dynamics and characteristics that influence history in very different ways.

    It was with this in mind that three UConn scholars gathered at the Old State House in Hartford on Tuesday, Oct. 8, to analyze the current presidential contest in terms of historical significance – and what makes this election distinct.

    Christopher Vials, professor of English at UConn, engages in a discussion during the “Historic Firsts: The 2024 Presidential Election” forum at the Old State House in Hartford on Oct. 8, 2024. (Sydney Herdle/UConn Photo)

    One of the most striking differences between this election and every previous presidential campaign is that a major party nominee – Vice President Kamala Harris – is a woman of color. Even more remarkable, the scholars said, is the way she came to win the Democratic Party’s nomination – being endorsed by President Joe Biden after his unprecedented decision to drop out of the race just weeks before the party’s nominating convention in August.

    “What I will never forget, especially as a political scientist, is the way she came to be the Democratic nominee,” said Evelyn Simien, professor of Political Science, Director of the Africana Studies Institute, and author of “Historic Firsts: How Symbolic Empowerment Changes U.S. Politics (Oxford University Press, 2016).”

    Manisha Sinha, the James L. and Shirley A. Draper Chair in American History and author of “The Slave’s Cause: A History of Abolition (Yale University Press, 2017)” and “The Rise and Fall of the Second American Republic: Reconstruction, 1860-1920 (Liveright, 2024),” agreed that the circumstances of Harris’ nomination make the 2024 election unique.

    “This is probably one of the first times we’ve had a presidential nominee so late in the game who has been able to step up so quickly,” she said.

    Another distinctive factor of this election, argued Christopher Vials, professor of English and author of “Haunted by Hitler: Liberals, the Left, and the Fight Against Fascism in the United States (University of Massachusetts Press, 2014),” is that “new taboos continue to be broken” in political rhetoric surrounding the race.

    Pointing to an interview the pundit Tucker Carlson conducted in September with a far-right podcaster notorious for defending the Third Reich and blaming Winston Churchill for World War II, Vials said, “Tucker Carlson is nodding his head, and then Elon Musk tweets about how that was a fabulous interview. They’re sort of breaking the Hitler taboo now.”

    One concern all three scholars shared was the possibility of low voter turnout, especially in states like Connecticut, where the presidential race is not expected to be competitive.

    “A lot of people become a little blasé about elections; they think noting changes, they think their vote doesn’t count, and that can open the door to authoritarian outcomes in elections,” Sinha said.

    Simien said she reminds her students that the right to vote has only, in historical terms, recently been won by all Americans regardless of race or gender, and shouldn’t be taken for granted.

    “Younger voters owe a debt to older generations, people who have sacrificed life and limb so that we can have the right to cast a vote in American elections,” she said.

    Vials noted the importance of elections for state and local offices, pointing out that decisions made in city hall or Hartford often have immediate, direct consequences in daily life.

    “State elections affect your lives a lot; they determine whether social services are going to be provided, whether universities are going to be funded, tax rates, who gets taxed – those are things that affect people’s lives every day, apart from the federal election,” he said.

    Connecticut residents will be able to vote early for the first time this year: balloting begins on October 21 and runs for 14 days. 

    The forum at the Old State House was Sponsored by the UConn American Studies Program, the Department of Critical and Social Inquiry, the English Department, The Africana Studies Institute, the History Department, and the Department of Political Science at UConn.

    A video recording of the discussion can be viewed on YouTube.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: ERO Boston arrests Guatemalan national charged with forcibly raping Massachusetts child

    Source: US Immigration and Customs Enforcement

    BOSTON — Enforcement and Removal Operations Boston apprehended an unlawfully present 38-year-old Guatemalan national charged with forcibly raping a Massachusetts minor. Officers with ERO Boston arrested Maynor Francisco Hernandez-Rodas Sept. 20 in Lowell.

    “Maynor Francisco Hernandez-Rodas stands accused of horrific crimes against a Massachusetts child,” said ERO Boston acting Field Office Director Patricia H. Hyde. “He represents a significant danger to the children of our community that we will not tolerate. ERO Boston will continue to prioritize public safety by arresting and removing egregious noncitizen threats from our New England neighborhoods.”

    Hernandez unlawfully entered the United States on an unknown date, at an unknown location and without inspection, admission or parole by a U.S. immigration official.

    The Bridgeport, Connecticut, District Court convicted Hernandez Sept. 16, 2011, for the offense of breach of peace. The court sentenced him to six months in prison followed by a six-month suspended sentence and one year of probation.

    The Norwalk, Connecticut, District Court convicted Hernandez May 15, 2016, for the offense of breach of peace and issued him a $100 fine.

    The Lowell Police Department arrested Hernandez June 14, 2024, for aggravated rape of a child and rape of a child with force.

    ERO Boston lodged an immigration detainer against Hernandez with the MCHOC June 28.

    The Middlesex Superior Court arraigned Hernandez Sept. 4 for aggravated rape of a child with force and rape of a child by force.

    The Middlesex Superior Court ignored ERO Boston’s immigration detainer and released Hernandez from custody on an unknown date.

    Officers with ERO Boston arrested Hernandez Sept. 20 in Lowell. Hernandez remains in ERO custody.

    As part of its mission to identify and arrest removable noncitizens, ERO lodges immigration detainers against noncitizens who have been arrested for criminal activity and taken into custody by state or local law enforcement. An immigration detainer is a request from U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement to state or local law enforcement agencies to notify ICE as early as possible before a removable noncitizen is released from their custody. Detainers request that state or local law enforcement agencies maintain custody of the noncitizen for a period not to exceed 48 hours beyond the time the individual would otherwise be released, allowing ERO to assume custody for removal purposes in accordance with federal law.

    Detainers are critical public safety tools because they focus enforcement resources on removable noncitizens who have been arrested for criminal activity. Detainers increase the safety of all parties involved — ERO personnel, law enforcement officials, the removable noncitizens and the public — by allowing an arrest to be made in a secure and controlled custodial setting as opposed to at-large within the community. Since detainers result in the direct transfer of a noncitizen from state or local custody to ERO custody, they also minimize the potential that an individual will reoffend. Additionally, detainers conserve scarce government resources by allowing ERO to take criminal noncitizens into custody directly rather than expending resources locating these individuals at-large.

    ERO conducts removals of individuals without a lawful basis to remain in the United States, including at the order of immigration judges with Department of Justice’s Executive Office for Immigration Review. The Executive Office for Immigration Review is a separate entity from the Department of Homeland Security and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Immigration judges in these courts make decisions based on the merits of each individual case, determining if a noncitizen is subject to a final order of removal or eligible for certain forms of relief from removal.

    As one of ICE’s three operational directorates, ERO is the principal federal law enforcement authority in charge of domestic immigration enforcement. ERO’s mission is to protect the homeland through the arrest and removal of those who undermine the safety of U.S. communities and the integrity of U.S. immigration laws, and its primary areas of focus are interior enforcement operations, management of the agency’s detained and non-detained populations, and repatriation of noncitizens who have received final orders of removal. ERO’s workforce consists of more than 7,700 law enforcement and non-law enforcement support personnel across 25 domestic field offices and 208 locations nationwide, 30 overseas postings, and multiple temporary duty travel assignments along the border.

    Members of the public can report crimes and suspicious activity by dialing 866-DHS-2-ICE (866-347-2423) or completing the online tip form.

    Learn more about ICE’s mission to increase public safety in our New England communities on X, formerly known as Twitter, at @EROBoston.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: UN Human Rights Council 57: Resolution on Sudan

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    L22 Resolution on Sudan. Statement delivered by the UK’s Permanent Representative to the WTO and UN in Geneva, Simon Manley.

    Mr President,

    On behalf of a core group consisting of Germany, Norway, the United States and the United Kingdom, I would like to present draft resolution L22.

    Four years ago, this Council paid tribute to the exemplary, non-violent and inspiring popular uprising of the Sudanese people whose call for freedom, peace and justice, had brought about a fundamental change in Sudan’s political and human rights situation. The contrast to the situation in Sudan today could not be more stark. The senseless, brutal war that began last year has displaced over 10 million people.

    The Council’s fact-finding mission has documented some of the appalling suffering which Sudan’s people have endured. Women raped and sexually abused. People executed because of their ethnicity. Children recruited as soldiers. Indiscriminate shelling in civilian areas.

    More recent reporting of attacks by Rapid Support Forces in El Fasher and by the Sudanese Armed forces in greater Khartoum are horrifying. Airstrikes and shelling by both parties have killed many civilians and dozens of young men have reportedly been executed in the streets of Khartoum, for suspected affiliation with the RSF.

    Mr President,

    We would prefer not to have to present a resolution. But clearly – this situation warrants the Council’s attention. We need independent monitoring. We need to document these atrocities. The people of Sudan need accountability. It is only then that lasting peace can be achieved. The Fact-Finding Mission, the only independent mechanism focused on investigating the mass violations and abuses across the country, must be renewed. There is no other international mechanism doing this work and there is no feasible national alternative. Sudan’s ‘national committee’ is neither impartial, nor independent. And it is being used to silence those that criticise the authorities’ actions.

    Mr President,

    Our core group held consultations and consulted extensively with all delegations – including Sudan – on this draft. We took on board many of the suggestions made, including a number from Sudan. Unfortunately, despite our best efforts, these changes were not enough for the Sudanese authorities.

    Colleagues,

    The situation in Sudan has been shamefully underreported. There is already too little information coming out of the country. The Sudanese authorities may not be in favour of this resolution, but the Sudanese people are. They want accountability. They want peace. They want their future back.

    Let us show them today that they are not forgotten and that we are listening to them – by voting in favour of this resolution.

    Updates to this page

    Published 9 October 2024

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI Canada: Competitive compensation for resident physicians

    Source: Government of Canada regional news

    [embedded content]

    Alberta’s government, in partnership with Alberta Health Services (AHS), the University of Alberta, University of Calgary and the Professional Association of Resident Physicians of Alberta has reached a four-year agreement that provides competitive and fair-market compensation for physicians in training.

    The negotiated agreement provides wage increases of three per cent in each of the first two years, and two per cent in each of the last two years. It also includes market adjustments that put Alberta on par with other western Canadian medical schools.

    Ensuring resident physicians receive competitive, fair-market compensation while they train and provide services across the province will help stabilize and strengthen acute health care today while bringing medical students and ultimately more physicians to the province to support the province’s future health needs.

    “Alberta’s government is grateful for all the hard work resident physicians put in as they complete their training. We are pleased to see that a new agreement has been reached and look forward to more physicians calling Alberta home.”

    Adriana LaGrange, Minister of Health

    “We are extremely grateful to all of our resident physicians, who play a vital role in caring for Albertans and supporting our front-line physicians and health care teams. This agreement will help us recruit medical students and encourage them to practise in this province.”

    Athana Mentzelopoulos, president and CEO, AHS

    Rural and Remote Family Medicine Resident Physician Bursary Pilot Program

    The agreement builds on actions Alberta’s government is taking to make the province a more attractive place for medical students and resident physicians to study and practise. On Oct. 3, Alberta’s government announced measures to improve health care in rural and remote communities through the new Rural and Remote Family Medicine Resident Physician Bursary Pilot Program. The bursary program is part of the province’s Rural Health Action Plan.

    The pilot program will provide up to $8 million annually for the next two years to medical students in their final year of an undergraduate medical program when they are matched with a family medicine residency program at the University of Alberta or University of Calgary, or to residents currently completing a family medicine residency at either university regardless of their year of study. In return, bursary recipients will commit to delivering comprehensive patient care in eligible communities for three years after completing their residency. 

    “With this agreement, Alberta strengthens its position as an attractive destination for resident physicians across Canada. By enhancing compensation, training and working conditions, we ensure Alberta recruits and retains the brightest medical talent to serve our communities and shape the future of health care.”

    Dr. Pauwlina Cyca, president, Professional Association of Resident Physicians of Alberta (PARA)

    “The University of Alberta is pleased collaborations with our partners have resulted in an agreement that reflects the critical impact resident physicians make in our health care system so all Albertans receive the care they need.” 

    Brenda Hemmelgarn, dean and vice-provost, College of Health Sciences, and dean, faculty of medicine & dentistry, University of Alberta

    “Remuneration, respect, retention and recruitment of rural generalists are key to elevating rural hospitals to becoming rural centres of excellence. With this agreement and bursary pilot program, the Alberta government is recognizing rural health as being different, requiring separate and unique solutions for our communities that are mutually beneficial in enhancing the health of rural Albertans.”

    Dr. Rithesh Ram, president, section of rural medicine, Alberta Medical Association

    Quick facts

    • Resident physicians have graduated medical school but are completing post-graduate training in a residency program to obtain their licence to practise. With residency programs requiring an additional two to seven years of post-graduate training, most resident physicians spend more than 10 years training to become fully licensed physicians and surgeons.
    • The Professional Association of Resident Physicians of Alberta represents more than 1,660 resident physicians in Alberta.
    • The current agreement between AHS, the University of Alberta, University of Calgary and the association ended on June 30, 2024.
    • The resident physician agreement is funded by Alberta Health through a grant to AHS and the universities.

    Related information

    • Postgraduate medical education (AHS)

    Related news

    • Improving health care in rural and remote Alberta (Oct. 3, 2024)

    Multimedia

    • Watch the news conference

    MIL OSI Canada News

  • MIL-OSI Security: Kalispell Man Admits Pointing Laser at Airplane

    Source: Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) State Crime News

    MISSOULA — A Kalispell man today admitted to pointing a laser at an airplane while it was in flight over Kalispell, U.S. Attorney Jesse Laslovich said.

    The defendant, Nolan Wayne Hamman, 32, pleaded guilty to aiming a laser pointer at an aircraft as charged in an indictment. Hamman faces a maximum of five years in prison, a $250,000 fine and three years of supervised release.

    U.S. Magistrate Judge Kathleen L. DeSoto presided. Sentencing was set for Feb. 6, 2025 before U.S. District Judge Dana L. Christensen. The court will determine any sentence after considering the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and other statutory factors. Hamman was detained pending further proceedings.

    In court documents, the government alleged that on Nov. 25, 2023, a flight instructor operating a plane over Kalispell called 911 to report a person shining a laser pointer at her plane while she was flying with a minor student. The Flathead County Sheriff’s Office deputies responded and located Hamman on the ground with the laser pointer. Hamman admitted to shining the laser at the plane while it was in flight.

    The U.S. Attorney’s Office is prosecuting the case. The FBI, Federal Aviation Administration, Flathead County Sheriff’s Office and Kalispell Police Department conducted the investigation.

    XXX

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Security: Indiana Men Plead Guilty to Assaulting Law Enforcement During January 6 Capitol Breach

    Source: Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) State Crime Alerts (b)

                WASHINGTON – Two men from Indiana pleaded guilty on Oct. 3, 2024, to assaulting law enforcement during the Jan. 6, 2021, breach of the U.S. Capitol. Their actions and the actions of others disrupted a joint session of the U.S. Congress convened to ascertain and count the electoral votes related to the 2020 presidential election.

                Donald Lee Moss, 62, of Elizabethtown, Indiana, and James Link Behymer, 61, of Hope, Indiana, each pleaded guilty to one count of assaulting, resisting, or impeding certain officers before U.S. District Judge Tanya S. Chutkan. The two men will be sentenced on Feb. 13, 2025.

                According to court documents, at about 2:00 p.m. on Jan. 6, 2021, in Washington, D.C., a group of Metropolitan Police (MPD) officers, wearing riot gear, walked toward the Lower West Terrace of the U.S. Capitol building as angry and violent rioters descended on, and surrounded, the officers and began shouting obscenities and curses at them.

                The surrounded officers repeatedly issued commands to “move back.” They also began to move rioters away from their positions with their hands and batons. At approximately 2:01 p.m., Behymer approached the MPD officers with his friend, Donald Lee Moss. An MPD officer then extended his hand toward Behymer and said, “Sir, step back for your own safety.” Other officers directed Behymer and Moss to move back, but they did not. Behymer raised his right arm with a closed fist and repeatedly shouted, “USA! USA! USA!”  At the same time, Moss pointed toward the U.S. Capitol building and shouted, “This is our f— house!”

                At 2:01 p.m., an MPD officer extended their hand, attempting to keep Behymer back. Behymer then swung his fist down, striking the officer’s wrist. A few seconds later, the MPD officer placed their right hand on Behymer to keep him back; however, Behymer swung his left fist downward and struck the officer’s arm a second time while Moss forcibly shoved the officer’s hand off Behymer.

                Behymer continued to shout, “USA! USA! USA!” and Moss told the officer to “Get your f— hand off of him!” as the mob constricted the officers’ movements and pushed into them. Some members of the mob threw objects, including a traffic cone, at the officers. Amidst the chaos, rioters screamed: “F— You! F— Nazis!”, “Go back to the Gestapo training camp!” “You’re the traitors!” and “You wanna take us all on?!” Shortly after striking the officer’s arm, Moss leaned in and forcefully pushed another MPD officer from behind.

                At approximately 2:02 p.m., Behymer was at the front of the rioters, physically pressed into the officers. A rioter shouted at police: “Y’all surrounded.” Behymer then grabbed an officer’s hand and baton while the officer attempted to keep Behymer away. At approximately 2:03 p.m., Behymer re-engaged with police—again grabbing an officer’s baton.

                Ten minutes after assaulting and opposing officers on the Lower West Terrace, at approximately 2:13 p.m., Behymer and Moss entered the U.S. Capitol building through the Senate Wing doors. At approximately 2:21p.m. Moss stood at a shattered window and waived other rioters towards the Capitol building, encouraging them to enter the building. The two men then made their way toward the Crypt and the hallway linking toward the Senate Wing Doors. At about 2:31 p.m., Moss carried a chair across the Crypt lobby and placed it directly in the path of the retractable ceiling door to prevent the door from closing.

                Moss and Behymer exited the Capitol at approximately 2:41 p.m. and 2:43 p.m., respectively At about 2:48 p.m., rioters broke through a barricade set up by Capitol Police at the Senate Wing doors. Roughly two minutes later, Behymer and Moss re-entered the Capitol again via the Senate Wing doors and walked toward the Crypt before exiting at 3:34 p.m.

                The U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia and the Department of Justice National Security Division’s Counterterrorism Section are prosecuting this case. The U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Indiana provided valuable assistance.

                The FBI’s Indianapolis and Washington Field Offices are investigating this case. Moss was listed as BOLO (Be on the Lookout) #401 on the FBI’s website. Valuable assistance was provided by the U.S. Capitol Police and the Metropolitan Police Department.

                In the 44 months since Jan. 6, 2021, more than 1,504 individuals have been charged in nearly all 50 states for crimes related to the breach of the U.S. Capitol, including more than 560 individuals charged with assaulting or impeding law enforcement, a felony. The investigation remains ongoing.

                Anyone with tips can call 1-800-CALL-FBI (800-225-5324) or visit tips.fbi.gov.

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Europe: A bastion of democracy: helping journalism survive and thrive

    Source: European Union 2

    This year’s Connecting EU seminar, the EESC flagship annual communication event for civil society communicators, will be talking about journalism and the crucial need to preserve its independence and accountability as essential foundations for safeguarding democracy and preventing its decline.

    Apart from mounting political pressures and restrictions in media freedom, journalism is facing unprecedented challenges stemming from the rapid rise of generative AI, and all the good and bad it brings. Can journalism stay relevant in a world, where, according to some reports, over 20% of young people rely solely on TikTok to get their information?

    On top of this, old challenges, such as lack of media ownership transparency and insufficient funding, seem set to stay. What will it take for journalism to remain a cornerstone of democracy? How can civil society and journalists, as key democratic watchdogs, best team up in this new context?

    Taking place on 17 and 18 October in Brussels, under the title ‘A bastion of democracy: helping journalism survive and thrive’, the seminar will include two panels and a practical networking session:

    • Responsible journalism in the post-truth era. Is responsible journalism even viable today? In a world where media outlets are competing with influencers and social media as the sources of news, will journalism have to reinvent itself to stay a public good? Can the latest EU acts help make AI an ally of press freedom?
    • The job of living dangerously – investigative reporting. Investigative journalism has a long history of holding power to account and providing a voice for those seeking to report abuse of position and privilege. What kinds of challenges do investigative reporters have to grapple with to bring the truth to light? What protection do they have at their disposal to shield themselves from threats? Can the EU legislation secure more freedom and power for them?
    • Working as a press or communication officer in the age of Instagram, TikTok and AI – how to get your message across (networking session and workshops). Through presentations and hands-on workshops, the session aims to offer a glimpse into the brave new world of communicating to different audiences, including young people.

    The seminar is part of the ‘Connecting EU’ series, now in its 17th year.  Every year, this event provides a platform for press and communication professionals from civil society organisations to network and discuss current issues of common interest affecting Europe. It brings together EESC members and other EU representatives, partner organisations from Member States, journalists and researchers to debate the hot issues of the day.

    The Connecting EU 2024 seminar will take place at the EESC premises in Brussels and is organised with the support of the European Federation for Journalists and the Daphne Caruana Galizia Prize for Journalism.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Video: WTO Government Procurement Agreement

    Source: World Trade Organization – WTO (video statements)

    10 years ago, the revised Government Procurement Agreement entered into force.

    The GPA helps participating governments to get better value for money and their companies access opportunities in public contracts.

    Download this video from the WTO website:
    https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/webcas_e/webcas_e.htm

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2YHUzZ2DOQ

    MIL OSI Video

  • MIL-OSI Canada: Supporting Critical Minerals Development in Northern Ontario 

    Source: Government of Canada News

    News release

    October 9, 2024                                         Sudbury, Ontario                       Natural Resources Canada

    The Government of Canada is working to seize the generational opportunity presented by critical minerals while ensuring that Indigenous Peoples and communities share in those benefits. Canada is well positioned to be a global leader and first-class producer of a wide variety of critical minerals that are essential to power the clean economy — including nickel and copper — and, in turn, create good jobs and support economic opportunities across critical mineral value chains — from mining to processing, manufacturing and recycling.

    Today, the Honourable Jonathan Wilkinson, Canada’s Minister of Energy and Natural Resources, announced funding to support the further development of critical minerals in Sudbury and the surrounding region.

    Minister Wilkinson announced up to $8.4 million in conditionally approved funding provided through the Critical Minerals Infrastructure Fund (CMIF), pending final due diligence from Natural Resources Canada, for five critical mineral infrastructure development projects in the Sudbury and Timmins regions. This investment would include:

    • Up to $6.8 million for the Crawford Nickel Sulphide Project to inform the mine’s electrification and connection to the Ontario electricity grid. This includes:
      • Up to $2.4 million for Transmission Infrastructure Partnerships 1 Limited to advance a transmission line connecting the Crawford Nickel Sulphide Project to the Ontario power grid.
      • Up to $4.4 million for Canada Nickel Company Ltd. to conduct studies to inform the Crawford Nickel Sulphide Project’s electrification plan. When in production, the Project is expected to create over 1,500 high-paying jobs, according to Canada Nickel, and its electrification will reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 60 percent compared with diesel-powered operations. 
    • Up to $1.6 million for Magna Mining Inc. to support pre-construction activities to help power the Shakespeare and Crean Hill mines with clean electricity and connect the Shakespeare mine to the Ontario highway system. These mines will produce nickel and copper and help meet demand for these critical minerals as demand for use in clean technologies increases. The Crean Hill project is restarting an existing mine to meet this demand.

    Also, with $2.7 million from Natural Resources Canada, Giyak Mishkawzid Shkagmikwe Inc. (GMS) and Taighwenini Technical Services Corporation (TTS), the economic development corporations of Atikameksheng Anishnawbek and Wahnapitae First Nation respectively, will purchase two production mining drills. These drills will be leased out to support First Nations training opportunities, wealth generation and participation in the clean economy. This purchase will help Indigenous partners participate in the revitalization at Vale’s Stobie mine, which is a nearly $1-billion joint project of Vale, Thiess, United Steel Workers and local First Nations, to produce more nickel and copper. The historic Stobie Pit, which ceased operations in 2017 after 100 years, will be restarted to continue providing good jobs for the people of Sudbury, and production is expected to ramp up in the coming years.

    Minister Wilkinson made the announcement while visiting the Vale Stobie mine site in Sudbury. The Minister was in Sudbury to participate in the Conference of Mining Regions and Cities hosted by the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.

    Critical minerals are essential components in products used for clean energy technologies such as electric vehicles, electrical transmission lines and batteries. Canada’s mining sector provides many of the building blocks of clean technologies, including nickel and copper, needed to fight climate change and build a clean economy.

    Across the country, clean energy solutions are providing enormous economic opportunity for Canada. The critical mineral sector is already highly valuable to our economy. In 2022, the minerals and metals sector directly employed 420,000 people and contributed $109 billion of Canada’s total gross domestic product (GDP). Since 2020, automotive and battery manufacturers have announced investments of over $40 billion in electric vehicle production and the battery supply chain. With government support and with demand for critical minerals expected to double by 2024, these sectors will only grow. Today’s investments in mining and critical minerals will help deliver jobs and economic opportunities for Northern Ontario, along with Indigenous partners and communities.  

    Quotes

    “Today’s investments are about fostering Northern Ontario’s mining expertise to create more jobs and drive economic growth.  It is our priority that Indigenous partners have a part to play in the development of natural resources on our way to a clean energy future. The mining industry is one of the top employers for Indigenous communities across Canada, and we want to continue to encourage collaboration between mining and Indigenous communities.”

    The Honourable Jonathan Wilkinson

    Minister of Energy and Natural Resources

    “Canada is a mining nation and a leader in sustainable resource management. In Northern Ontario, particularly in Nickel Belt, our strong environmental, social and governance standards will be crucial as demand for critical minerals rises. By partnering with Indigenous communities and local mining partners, we ensure responsible sourcing of essential materials while protecting our planet and economy.”

    Marc G. Serré, MP for Nickel Belt, Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Energy and Natural Resources and Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Official Languages

    “Investing in critical minerals in Northern Ontario is vital for both our economic prosperity and future sustainability. Investing in our Indigenous communities is also fundamental to ensuring economic reconciliation. Northern Ontario has the key ingredients and partners to transition to a clean economy, and we know the right support is needed. These investments demonstrate our government’s commitment to supporting Indigenous communities and the mining and mining supply industry.” 

    Viviane Lapointe

    Member of Parliament, Sudbury

    “With our traditional territories spanning one of Canada’s key mining basins, it is critical that we take an active role in local mining activities. By owning and renting these drills, our communities will reap significant benefits, both economically and through the creation of meaningful employment opportunities.”

    Craig Nootchtai

    Gimaa (Chief), Atikameksheng Anishnawbek.

    “This marks the beginning of an exciting new venture for us. I believe this is a great example of how we, as First Nation communities, can support mining on our traditional territories when it is carried out in a way that respects and strengthens Indigenous Peoples, as well as our culture and history.”

    Larry Roque

    Chief, Wahnapitae First Nation

    “Canada Nickel is pleased to receive this contribution from the Government of Canada for the development of our clean energy infrastructure. With the CMIF’s support and meaningful Indigenous partnerships, Canada Nickel can integrate low-carbon grid power as we advance our Crawford Nickel Sulphide Project toward construction. Our flagship Project, anticipated to be Canada’s largest nickel mine, is expected to contribute a significant amount of nickel, cobalt and chromium to advance the Canadian Critical Minerals Strategy. Together, we are contributing to a future where resource development aligns with environmental stewardship and reconciliation.”

    Mark Selby

    CEO, Canada Nickel Company

    “These proposed investments from the Critical Minerals Infrastructure Fund will make a significant contribution toward the success of Magna Mining’s Crean Hill and Shakespeare Projects in Sudbury. We expect that these projects will benefit many stakeholders in the Sudbury region over the coming years, including the Indigenous communities and Indigenous-owned businesses that will play key roles in the development of these mines. We look forward to continued collaboration with the Government of Canada as we bring multiple new critical mineral mines into production in Sudbury.”

    Paul Fowler

    Senior Vice President, Magna Mining Inc.

    Quick facts

    • Stainless steel is the largest end use for nickel, accounting for just under two-thirds of total consumption. Nickel is used as an alloying agent in the manufacture of both metal products that contain iron and those that do not. It is also used in electroplating, in which a thin layer of nickel is coated onto a metal object as a decorative feature or to provide resistance to corrosion and wear. While nickel is well known as a component in the manufacture of nickel-cadmium batteries, an important evolving use is in production of lithium-ion batteries for EVs.

    • In 2022, Canada produced 143,266 tonnes of nickel in concentrate. Ontario produced 50 percent of Canada’s mined nickel.

    • Ontario-based Electra Battery Materials is developing a cobalt and nickel sulfate production plant and a lithium-ion battery recycling plant north of Toronto.

    • The mining industry is the top private-sector industrial employer for Indigenous people in Canada.

    • Canada has developed its own critical minerals strategy with the aim of advancing the development of these resources and related value chains to drive the transition to a low-carbon economy and support advanced technology and manufacturing.

    • The Canadian Critical Minerals Strategy addresses five core objectives:

      o   supporting economic growth, competitiveness and job creation;

      o   promoting climate action and strong environmental management;

      o   enhancing global security and partnerships with allies;

      o   advancing reconciliation with Indigenous peoples; and

      o   fostering diverse and inclusive workforces and communities.

    • Canada’s whole-of-government approach to critical mineral development is collaborative, forward-looking, iterative, adaptive and long-term. The initiatives presented in the Strategy will be implemented and refined in collaboration with provincial, territorial, Indigenous, industry and other Canadian and international partners.

    • Budget 2022 allocated $100 million over five years starting in 2022–23, to renew and expand the Indigenous Partnerships Office (IPO) and the INRP Program to make it a national natural resource sector-wide program.

    • At least $25 million of the $80 million in INRP contribution funding is to be dedicated to early engagement and Indigenous communities’ capacity building to support their participation in the Critical Minerals Strategy.

    • The CMIF is a key program under the Strategy to support enabling clean energy and transportation infrastructure projects necessary to increase Canada’s supply of responsibly sourced critical minerals.

    • The CMIF supports strategic priorities such as decarbonizing industrial mining operations, strengthening supply chains through transportation infrastructure and advancing economic reconciliation by supporting the participation of Indigenous Peoples in infrastructure and critical minerals projects.

    • In addition, the federal government is helping to develop Canada’s abundant critical minerals through NRCan’s Regional Energy and Resource Tables. These regional tables are joint partnerships with individual provinces and territories — in collaboration with Indigenous partners and with the input of key stakeholders — to identify and accelerate shared economic priorities for a low-carbon future in the energy and resource sectors.

    Related products

    Associated links

    Contacts

    Natural Resources Canada
    Media Relations
    343-292-6100
    media@nrcan-rncan.gc.ca

    Cindy Caturao
    Press Secretary
    Office of the Minister of Energy and Natural Resources
    613-795-5638
    cindy.caturao@nrcan-rncan.gc.ca

    Follow us on LinkedIn

    MIL OSI Canada News

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Culture Secretary sets out plans to turbocharge the economic impact of British filmmaking

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy has today laid legislation in Parliament introducing a new tax relief for independent British films to boost the growth of the UK’s world class film sector.

    • Culture Secretary tells Parliament new indy film tax relief will boost jobs, growth and investment in the UK’s regions and nations
    • Move comes as Pinewood Studios announces a new Indie Production Hub
    • Nandy commits to working with new Skills England to fill the 25,000 job vacancies in the creative industries

    She also told the Commons she would be working on a creative skills pathway to improve career opportunities for young people in the film industry. It comes as Pinewood Studios announced a new hub at its Buckinghamshire site to support Britain’s indie filmmakers.  

    In a statement in the House of Commons, she said: 

    Our independent film sector has produced films like Pride, The King’s Speech and Bend it Like Beckham that shows our heritage, our communities, and our culture to the world. It acts as a springboard from the grassroots for world class UK talent both on screen and behind the scenes.

    But while major film production has flourished, smaller budget independent films have not received sufficient support over the last decade. They face multiple challenges – rising production costs, crew shortages, and declining revenues which have hampered the growth of this vital part of the sector.

    While too much of our creative industries have traditionally been concentrated in just one part of the country, independent film thrives everywhere given the chance. So this uplift will not only boost creativity but create jobs, growth and investment in every nation and region. Through this we will help the independent film sector to reach its full potential.

    In response to the tax relief, Pinewood has today announced a new Independent Film Hub at its world-famous studios in Buckinghamshire. It will offer British indie filmmakers taking advantage of the tax relief support services and access to sound stages and workshop space.

    As well as confirming the tax relief, Nandy announced that the government will work with Skills England to improve career opportunities for young people in the creative industries. She said: 

    Too often people do not see themselves and their communities reflected in the story we tell ourselves about ourselves as a nation. And we are determined that this is going to change.

    The skills shortage that has been ignored for too long acts as a brake on the ambitions of this incredible sector. That is why this Government has already launched Skills England, to bring the skills we need for a decade of national renewal for our communities, businesses and country.

    We will focus apprenticeships once more on young people, to set them up to succeed and help fill the 25,000 vacancies in the creative sector.

    The Secretary of State for Education is overhauling the apprenticeship levy in order to provide better career opportunities for young people. Building on the success of existing high quality apprenticeships in the creative industries, we will work closely with Skills England to ensure the new flexibilities announced by the Prime Minister last month offer shorter apprenticeships and improve the offer for a creative skills pathway for young people embarking on careers in the creative sector. 

    Every child should have the chance to live a richer, larger life and consider a career in the arts.

    Nandy also confirmed that yesterday the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government recovered an appeal against the refusal of planning permission for Marlow Film Studios in Buckinghamshire. The planning merits of the proposal will now be reviewed by their Ministers in detail before reaching a decision.

    This evening Nandy will go on to attend the opening of the 68th London Film Festival at the BFI Southbank which is opening with the World Premiere of Blitz, the new Second World War film from one of Britain’s most successful directors, Steve McQueen.

    Today’s tax relief announcement is the latest in a series of interventions ahead of next week’s International Investment Summit to drive investment and growth, including in the creative industries.

    Updates to this page

    Published 9 October 2024

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI Global: Cambodia: journalist arrest signals false dawn for democracy as the country slides into authoritarianism

    Source: The Conversation – UK – By Sabina Lawreniuk, Principal Research Fellow, University of Nottingham

    Mech Dara, an award-winning Cambodian journalist and one of the kingdom’s last remaining independent media voices, was arrested on Monday, September 30. He has been detained over a social media post for “incitement to disturb social security”, and faces up to two years in jail.

    The news of Dara’s arrest has saddened and disturbed many within Cambodia and elsewhere. But it will have shocked few. Dara’s courageous journalism has made him a persistent thorn in the side of Cambodia’s ruling class.

    No stranger to harassment and intimidation by Cambodia’s increasingly repressive state apparatus, Dara had told me when we last met that he was considering applying for political asylum abroad. Life had become impossible in Cambodia.

    From humble beginnings, Dara built his reputation on a dogged commitment to justice, whose work includes exposing human rights abuse, illegal logging, land grabs and labour struggles in his homeland. These are rife in a notoriously corrupt state that ranks 141 out of 142 countries worldwide on the World Justice Project’s Rule of Law Index.

    Most recently, however, Dara’s investigations have focused on uncovering abuse in Cambodia’s cyberscam industry. Dara’s reporting, which in 2023 earned him a “Hero” commendation by the US State Department, revealed how the industry often involves cyberscam compounds staffed by victims of human trafficking.

    His investigations have disclosed how these people are compelled under the threat of physical torture and financial extortion to perform acts of deception and fraud on targets across China, the US, Europe and beyond, through fake romances or cryptocurrency schemes.

    The UN estimates that at least 100,000 people have been tricked into participating in this criminal industry, which is now said to be worth more than US$12 billion (£9.1 billion) per year in Cambodia.

    Dara has turned to identifying the political and business elites in Cambodia whose complicity enables the criminal syndicates who run the compounds to flourish with impunity.

    Some of his best-known work linked the LYP Group, which is owned by prominent Cambodian businessman and state senator, Ly Yong Phat, to the operation of scam compounds in Cambodia’s Koh Kong province. Ly Yong Phat continues to deny any involvement.

    The timing of Dara’s arrest may be no coincidence. He was detained 18 days after the US treasury department sanctioned Ly Yong Phat for his role in serious human rights abuse related to the treatment of trafficked workers.

    Dara’s arrest is believed by some to be an act of retaliation intended to send a chilling message to those who challenge the vested interests of Cambodia’s incumbent kleptocracy: be silent or you will be silenced.

    It continues a pattern of the Cambodian oligarchy’s waging of “lawfare” against members of civil society, using the court system to intimidate and muzzle critics. It is the surest sign yet that Cambodia’s new prime minister, Hun Manet, intends to follow his predecessor’s pathway into intensifying authoritarianism.

    The son rises

    Cambodia’s self-proclaimed “strongman” leader, Hun Sen, stepped down as prime minster in August 2023 after nearly 40 years in power. He chose Manet, his oldest son, as his successor.

    A dynastic succession does not typically indicate a democratic transfer of power. Yet hopes were raised that Manet might reverse the increasingly authoritarian trajectory of his father’s rule.

    Where Hun Sen came of age fighting on the frontlines of Cambodia’s civil war, Hun Manet has had a more worldly upbringing. He was educated in the US and UK, and obtained a PhD in economics from the University of Bristol.

    Cambodian prime minister, Hun Manet, who succeeded his father Hun Sen in 2023.
    Sa sola / Shutterstock

    Some observers believed that the softly spoken and sharp-suited Manet might possess a more liberal worldview than that of his father, ushering a new era of renewed democracy.

    Hun Sen’s reign in Cambodia was characterised by an increasing reliance on what researcher Neil Loughlin terms the “politics of coercion” to cement his hold on power. The Hun family are at the centre of a network of tightly entwined business and state elites that exert a stranglehold over Cambodia’s politics and economy.

    This kleptocratic coalition is accused of asset-stripping the kingdom of its once-abundant natural resources, enriching themselves at the cost of impoverishing the many. As a result, popular dissent has grown.

    To quell any threat to its longevity, the ruling Cambodian People’s party (CPP) has led a concerted crackdown on freedoms of association, assembly and expression. Over the past decade, this has included the shuttering of almost all independent news outlets, the dissolution of the opposition Cambodian National Rescue party, and the detention of its leader, Kem Sokha, under house arrest.

    As the architect of the Paris Peace Accords that brokered the end to Cambodia’s civil war, the old guard of the party has sought to legitimise its heavyhanded approach by stressing the continued need to preserve order and stability to prevent descent into further unrest.

    A false dawn

    Manet has been keen to present himself as part of a new guard, ready to reengage with major powers such as the US and EU. Both the US and EU had cooled relations with Cambodia following the democratic deficits unleashed during Hun Sen’s premiership.

    Yet the cyberscam story and its growing repercussions have embarrassed Cambodia on the international stage. By apparently censoring Mech Dara for uncovering the scandal, rather than seeking to control party elements responsible for the cyberscam scourge, Manet appears to be showing where his true loyalties and sentiments lie.

    Dara is but one of a long line of dissenters charged with “incitement” by the CPP-controlled courts. With its explicit reference to the conjured threat of renewed social chaos, it harks to the CPP’s past as custodian of order and stability.

    The heavyhanded nature of the arrest itself, where Dara was apprehended by a convoy of six military vehicles while on vacation with his family, is also straight out of the CPP’s historic playbook. Persecution not by stealth but by flourish, it sends a wider message to civil society to deter any would-be imitators.

    More crucially, it signals a forceful intent to preserve the power, plunder and impunity of Cambodia’s elites, and a commitment to the continued silencing of dissenting voices who threaten their supremacy.

    Sabina Lawreniuk receives funding from UKRI’s Future Leaders Fellowship scheme.

    ref. Cambodia: journalist arrest signals false dawn for democracy as the country slides into authoritarianism – https://theconversation.com/cambodia-journalist-arrest-signals-false-dawn-for-democracy-as-the-country-slides-into-authoritarianism-240382

    MIL OSI – Global Reports

  • MIL-OSI Global: Fix the climate or appease the fossil fuel industry – we can’t do both

    Source: The Conversation – UK – By Jack Marley, Environment + Energy Editor, UK edition

    Britain ended more than 140 years of coal power when it closed its last generator in September.

    Coal emits more heat-trapping gas to the atmosphere than any other fossil fuel, so its demise as a source of electricity is an unalloyed good for the climate. Yet, with another announcement a week later, the UK government has helped extend the reign of fossil fuels well into the 21st century.



    This roundup of The Conversation’s climate coverage comes from our award-winning weekly climate action newsletter. Every Wednesday, The Conversation’s environment editor writes Imagine, a short email that goes a little deeper into just one climate issue. Join the 35,000+ readers who’ve subscribed.


    Less than six months from polling day, the UK Labour party (then the official opposition) scrapped a campaign commitment to provide an annual stimulus of £28 billion (US$36.6 billion) for green industries.




    Read more:
    Labour’s £28 billion green investment promise could be watered down – here’s why


    Six billion pounds shy of this figure will now be raised over 25 years, Keir Starmer’s Labour government has revealed, but for a specific purpose: carbon capture and storage.

    “The technology works by capturing CO₂ as it is being emitted by a power plant or another polluter, then storing it underground,” says Mark Maslin, a professor of natural sciences at UCL.

    The Guardian reports that oil companies BP and Equinor will invest in a cluster of carbon capture and storage installations in Teesside, north-east England. Eni, an Italian oil company, is expected to develop sites in north-west England and north Wales. In each case, emissions will probably be pumped via gas pipes beneath the seabed.

    Starmer anointed “a new era” for green jobs when announcing this funding, but experts claim he is actually offering symbolic and strategic support to climate-wrecking energy sources that have dominated for centuries.

    A new error

    “This announcement represents a massive bet on a still unproven technology, and will lock the UK into fossil fuel dependence for decades to come,” Maslin says.




    Read more:
    The UK’s £22 billion bet on carbon capture will lock in fossil fuels for decades


    “The Climate Change Act mandates the UK should achieve net zero emissions by 2050, yet this will be impossible if carbon capture leads to the UK building new gas power stations instead of wind and solar farms.”

    Our ability to capture all this carbon is not guaranteed.
    DimaBerlin/Shutterstock

    Maslin was one of several scientists who wrote to energy secretary Ed Miliband criticising the plans. As he sees it, the government would not fund these projects if it did not see a future for fossil fuels beyond the middle of this century, by which time scientists have said our interference in the climate must end.

    The message is clear: expensive imports of natural gas (essentially methane, a potent greenhouse gas) are here to stay. Even successful deployment of carbon scrubbers at the point of burning this gas would not erase its climate impact, Maslin says, as it leaks at all stages of its production and use.

    But Maslin also doubts carbon capture and storage can siphon off the emissions of gas-fired power plants without adding to climate change. This is why climate scientists often describe carbon capture and storage as an unproven technology for decarbonising electricity and heavy industry: most of its applications have been in natural gas processing facilities where CO₂ is extracted for commercial uses.

    “The track record of adding carbon capture to power plants is much worse, with the vast majority of projects abandoned,” Maslin explains.

    More damning still, almost 80% of all the CO₂ captured by existing installations has been reinjected into oil fields – to pump more oil.

    Could carbon capture and storage tech turn natural gas into zero-carbon hydrogen, as some hope? Again, Maslin is dubious. Water is a cleaner source for hydrogen and using this fuel to heat homes or decarbonise factories is a second-rate solution compared with renewable electricity, he says.

    The fruits of appeasement

    Maslin and his co-signatories say that carbon capture and storage should be limited to reducing emissions from existing fossil power plants or steel furnaces while these emission sources are rapidly phased out.

    Marc Hudson at the University of Sussex is a historian of climate politics and policy in Australia, the US, UK and internationally. He has encountered policy proposals for carbon capture dating back to the 1970s and in his view, their overwhelming effect has been to prolong the use of fossil fuels by justifying investment in their expansion.




    Read more:
    Relying on carbon capture and storage may be a dangerous trap for UK industry


    “It’s the equivalent of smoking more and more cigarettes each day and gambling that a cure for cancer will exist by the time you need it,” he says.




    Read more:
    Cumbria coal mine: empty promises of carbon capture tech have excused digging up more fossil fuel for decades


    When trying to explain why rational climate policies like the mass insulation of draughty homes tends to lose out to investment in carbon capture and storage, Nils Markusson, a lecturer in environmental politics at Lancaster University, found something similar:

    “Home insulation does nothing to shield the profits of fossil fuel companies or landlords in the large and growing private rental sector,” he says.




    Read more:
    Does carbon capture and storage hype delay emissions cuts? Here’s what research shows


    In other words, appeasing the fossil fuel industry is a proviso of policies drafted to address climate change. This limitation has also infiltrated scientific assessments of the climate.

    A new report shows that “overshoot” scenarios – that is, projections of future climate change which accept the global target of 1.5°C will be at least temporarily breached – are rife in mainstream climate science.

    This is despite evidence of the permanent damage such a breach would cause – and our doubtful ability to reverse warming once it has exceeded these dangerous levels using speculative carbon removal technology.

    There is not enough land or energy to rapidly restore the carbon we have emitted.
    Oksana Bali/Shutterstock

    What has led us here? Comprehending the climate crisis and its solutions on terms favourable to the fossil fuel industry say Wim Carton and Andreas Malm, political ecologists at Lund University.

    “Avoiding climate breakdown demands that we bury the fantasy of overshoot-and-return and with it another illusion as well: that the Paris targets can be met without uprooting the status-quo.




    Read more:
    How mainstream climate science endorsed the fantasy of a global warming time machine


    “One limit after the other will be broken unless we manage to strand the necessary fossil assets and curtail opportunities for continuing to profit from oil and gas and coal.”

    ref. Fix the climate or appease the fossil fuel industry – we can’t do both – https://theconversation.com/fix-the-climate-or-appease-the-fossil-fuel-industry-we-cant-do-both-240694

    MIL OSI – Global Reports

  • MIL-OSI Global: Despite progress on poverty, Mexico’s first female president inherits a shaky economy

    Source: The Conversation – UK – By Nicolas Forsans, Professor of Management and Co-director of the Centre for Latin American & Caribbean Studies, University of Essex

    shutterstock Octavio Hoyos/Shutterstock

    Mexico’s first female president, leftwing academic and climate scientist Claudia Sheinbaum, has set out her agenda. She pledged to maintain the social policies of her mentor and predecessor, the widely popular former president Andrés Manuel López Obrador (commonly known by his initials, AMLO).

    She promised a transition to green energy, and set out the need for new infrastructure in railways, ports and airports. Sheinbaum inherits a US$1.79 trillion (£1.4 trillion) economy closely integrated to that of the US – in fact, Mexico has the second-largest economy in Latin America. It is also the most populous Spanish-speaking country in the world with 128 million people.

    But Sheinbaum also inherits Mexico’s largest budget deficit since the 1980s.

    Despite social policies that have seen 9.5 million Mexicans lifted from poverty during AMLO’s six-year term, 36% of Mexicans are still poor and 7% live in extreme poverty. Access to health services remains problematic, and has worsened for those living in deprivation.

    Gross domestic product per capita, a measure of wealth, actually fell during the previous administration, which means the “average” Mexican is worse off now than at the start of AMLO’s presidency. And next year, the central bank estimates GDP will grow by only 1.2%, which will inevitably constrain Sheinbaum in her early years in office.

    While campaigning, she promised to continue the social and political policies of her predecessor. Now in office, she will not only grapple with the country’s security situation but also navigate serious economic and fiscal challenges.




    Read more:
    As Mexico’s new president takes office, a renewed battle to contain cartel violence begins


    In 2018, AMLO took office in a relatively stable fiscal environment. His predecessor, Enrique Peña Nieto, had implemented significant reforms early in his term aimed at reducing reliance on oil revenues and energy subsidies.

    Nieto also sought to strengthen the country’s two stabilisation funds. The Oil Revenue Stabilisation Fund is aimed at protecting Mexico’s budget from fluctuations in oil revenues. Meanwhile, the Budget Income Stabilisation Fund seeks to stabilise budget revenues from non-oil sources, such as taxes.

    These funds have been crucial for maintaining economic stability given the volatility of commodity prices, especially since oil has historically been a key contributor to Mexico’s public finances. However, under AMLO’s administration, both funds were used to plug gaps, leaving them depleted and raising concerns about the country’s ability to weather economic downturns. The country has not balanced its books since 2007.

    High energy subsidies introduced in 2019 are putting a strain on public finances. Driven by a commitment by AMLO to shield consumers from rising international oil prices, subsidies increased as a result of the COVID pandemic in 2020, and again in 2022 amid the war in Ukraine.

    The recent rise in social spending to fund universal state pensions, social programmes and debt servicing has created considerable strain, pushing the deficit close to 6% of GDP. Mexico’s debt-to-GDP ratio is 50% this year, up from its 2018 level.

    The tax issue

    In most countries, tax revenues are used to fund social investment. But Mexico’s ability to raise taxes has been extremely limited – tax revenues amount to just 17% of the country’s GDP, below the Latin American average of 22%, and well below that of countries in the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) at 34%.

    Mexico has a large informal economy, with many workers and businesses not registered with tax authorities. Corruption, inefficiencies in tax administration and lack of trust in government institutions have led to low tax compliance, while efforts to increase taxes on the wealthy have met political resistance.

    Mexico has high levels of income inequality, and the wealthiest segments of society contribute relatively little to the overall tax revenue. Instead, the country had historically relied on oil revenues – which have declined – to fund public services and investment.

    AMLO had launched popular social programmes aimed at reducing poverty and inequalities. Now Sheinbaum has promised increased social spending while maintaining “fiscal responsibility” and not reforming tax (at least in her early presidency). That promise seems unrealistic. Without a change of approach, a fiscal crisis looms.

    However, she is expected to be a more pragmatic president than her predecessor. In part because she is less ideology-driven, but also because she won’t have a choice. If she wants to boost the economy and keep reducing poverty, she will need to attract foreign investment and encourage the private sector to play a much bigger role.

    Infrastructure will be a key focus, not least to ensure Mexico can benefit from the process of “near-shoring” – the relocation by multinationals of key processes away from Asia closer to the US market in order to minimise supply chain disruptions.

    Mexico stands to gain from the current desire by many companies to operate closer to the USA. As a result of the US-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), and its predecessor Nafta (North American Free Trade Agreement), Mexico enjoys tariff-free trade with its northern neighbours.

    But the country has not fully benefited from those opportunities. It lacks a consolidated investment promotion strategy and needs to produce more energy, ensuring it is from cleaner sources.

    It’s expected that Sheinbaum will continue government efforts to lift disadvantaged Mexicans out of poverty.

    Companies keen to invest in Mexico need access to low-emission hydrocarbons, as well as renewable energy. But AMLO viewed oil as a key part of Mexico’s sovereignty, eradicating previous reforms that had opened up the energy sector to private companies and preventing private investment in renewable energy. Instead, public finances were used to prop up ailing state-owned oil monopoly Pemex and national electricity company CFE.

    Given the fiscal challenges Sheinbaum inherits, Mexicans can expect the private sector to play a much greater role in infrastructure investment and in making the green energy transition a reality.

    As mayor of Mexico City, she championed public-private partnerships (PPP) while promoting solar energy. But to entice factories from Asia, she will also have to weaken the grip of the criminal organisations which are believed to control as much as a third of Mexico.

    During her tenure as mayor she halved the number of murders in the capital. But attempting to replicate this success throughout the country will be no small undertaking.

    Nicolas Forsans does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. Despite progress on poverty, Mexico’s first female president inherits a shaky economy – https://theconversation.com/despite-progress-on-poverty-mexicos-first-female-president-inherits-a-shaky-economy-240136

    MIL OSI – Global Reports

  • MIL-OSI Global: How mainstream climate science endorsed the fantasy of a global warming time machine

    Source: The Conversation – UK – By Wim Carton, Associate Professor of Political Ecology, Lund University

    When the Paris agreement on climate change was gavelled into being in December 2015, it briefly looked like that rarest of things: a political victory for climate activists and delegates from the poorest regions of the world that, due to colonisation by today’s wealthy nations, have contributed little to the climate crisis – but stand to suffer its worst ravages.

    The world had finally agreed an upper limit for global warming. And in a move that stunned most experts, it had embraced the stretch target of 1.5°C, the boundary that small island states, acutely threatened by sea-level rise, had tirelessly pushed for years.

    Or so, at least, it seemed. For soon, the ambitious Paris agreement limit turned out to be not much of a limit at all. When the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (or IPCC, the world’s foremost body of climate experts) lent its authority to the 1.5°C temperature target with its 2018 special report, something odd transpired.

    Nearly all modelled pathways for limiting global heating to 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels involved temporarily transgressing this target. Each still arrived back at 1.5°C eventually (the deadline being the random end point of 2100), but not before first shooting past it.

    Scientists responsible for modelling the response of Earth’s climate to greenhouse gas emissions – primarily caused by burning fossil fuels – called these “overshoot” scenarios. They became the dominant path along which mitigating climate change was imagined to proceed, almost as soon as talk of temperature limits emerged.

    De facto, what they said was this: staying below a temperature limit is the same as first crossing it and then, a few decades hence, using methods of removing carbon from the atmosphere to dial temperatures back down again.

    From some corners of the scientific literature came the assertion that this was nothing more than fantasy. A new study published in Nature has now confirmed this critique. It found that humanity’s ability to restore Earth’s temperature below 1.5°C of warming, after overshooting it, cannot be guaranteed. Many impacts of climate change are essentially irreversible. Those that are might take decades to undo, well beyond the relevant horizon for climate politics. For policy makers of the future, it matters little that temperatures might eventually fall back again; the impacts they will need to plan for are those of the overshoot period itself.

    Not coming back: tropical coral reefs face permanent destruction.
    Sabangvideo/Shutterstock

    The rise of overshoot ideology

    Even if global average surface temperatures are ultimately reversed, climate conditions at regional levels might not necessarily follow the global trend and might end up different from before. Delayed changes in ocean currents, for instance, could mean that the North Atlantic or Southern Ocean continue warming while the rest of the planet does not.

    Any losses and damages that accumulate during the overshoot period itself would of course be permanent. For a farmer in Sudan whose livestock perishes in a heatwave that would have been avoided at 1.5°C, it will be scant consolation to know that temperatures are scheduled to return to that level when her children have grown up.

    Then there is the dubious feasibility of planetary-scale carbon removal. Planting enough trees or energy crops to make a dent in global temperatures would require whole continents of land. Direct air capture of gigatonnes of carbon would consume prodigious amounts of renewable energy and so compete with decarbonisation. Whose land are we going to use for this? Who will shoulder the burdens for all this excess energy use?

    If reversal cannot be guaranteed, then clearly it is irresponsible to sanction a supposedly temporary overshoot of the Paris targets. And yet this is exactly what scientists have done. What compelled them to go down this dangerous route?

    Our own book on this topic (Overshoot: How the World Surrendered to Climate Breakdown, published last week by Verso) offers a history and critique of the idea.

    When overshoot scenarios were summoned into being in the early 2000s, the single most important reason was economics. Rapid, near-term emissions cuts were deemed prohibitively costly and so unpalatable. Cost optimisation mandated that they be pushed into the future to the extent possible.

    The models for projecting possible mitigation trajectories had these principles written into their code and so for the most part could not compute “low” temperature targets like 1.5 or 2°C. And because modellers could not imagine transgressing the deeply conservative constraints that they worked within, something else had to be transgressed.

    One team stumbled upon the idea that large-scale removal of carbon might be possible in the future, and so help reverse climate change. The EU and then the IPCC picked up on it, and before long, overshoot scenarios had colonised the expert literature. Deference to mainstream economics yielded a defence of the political status quo. This in turn translated into reckless experimentation with the climate system. Conservatism or fatalism about society’s capacity for change flipped into extreme adventurism about nature.

    Time to bury the time machine

    Just as the climate movement scored an important political victory, compelling the world to rally behind an ambitious temperature limit, an influential group of scientists, amplified by the world’s most authoritative scientific body on the subject, effectively helped water it down. When all is said and written about the post-Paris era, this surely should stand as one of its greatest tragedies.

    By conjuring up the fantasy of overshoot-and-return, scientists invented a mechanism for delaying climate action and unwittingly lent credibility to those (and they are many) who have no real interest in reigning in emissions here and now; who will seize on any excuse to keep the oil and gas and coal flowing just a little longer.

    A stable climate is not compatible with rising oil profits.
    Igor Hotinsky/Shutterstock

    The findings of this new paper make it perfectly clear: There is no time machine waiting in the wings. Once 1.5°C lies behind us, we must consider that threshold permanently broken.

    There then remains only one road to ambitious mitigation of climate change, and no amount of carbon dioxide removal can absolve us of its inconvenient political implications.

    Avoiding climate breakdown demands that we bury the fantasy of overshoot-and-return and with it another illusion as well: that the Paris targets can be met without uprooting the status-quo. One limit after the other will be broken unless we manage to strand fossil fuel assets and curtail opportunities for continuing to profit from oil and gas and coal.

    We will not mitigate climate change without confronting and defeating fossil fuel interests. We should expect climate scientists to be candid about this.



    Don’t have time to read about climate change as much as you’d like?

    Get our award-winning weekly roundup in your inbox instead. Every Wednesday, The Conversation’s environment editor writes Imagine, a short email that goes a little deeper into just one climate issue. Join the 35,000+ readers who’ve subscribed so far.


    Wim Carton receives funding for his work on carbon removal from the Swedish Research Council for Sustainable Development (Formas), the Swedish Energy Agency, the Marianne and Marcus Wallenberg Foundation, and the Independent Research Fund Denmark (DFF).

    Andreas Malm receives funding for his work on carbon removal from the Swedish Research Council for Sustainable Development (Formas).

    ref. How mainstream climate science endorsed the fantasy of a global warming time machine – https://theconversation.com/how-mainstream-climate-science-endorsed-the-fantasy-of-a-global-warming-time-machine-225597

    MIL OSI – Global Reports

  • MIL-OSI Security: Justice Department, Federal Trade Commission and Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Warn Consumers About Potential Scams and Price Gouging in the Wake of Hurricanes and other Natural Disasters

    Source: United States Attorneys General 1

    As the nation braces for another major hurricane, the Justice Department, along with the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), is warning consumers about those looking to take advantage of natural disasters by engaging in potential fraud, price gouging and collusive schemes.

    Scammers quickly exploit weather emergencies and take advantage of people trying to recover or donate to disaster victims. Weather emergencies provide disruptions to the supply chain, which can also provide opportunities for wrongdoers to engage in collusive schemes that inflate prices charged to customers who are under extreme stress and therefore unable to fight back against collusive or anticompetitive prices.

    “Companies are on notice: do not use the hurricane as an excuse to exploit people through illegal behavior,” said Deputy Assistant Attorney General Manish Kumar of the Justice Department’s Antitrust Division. “The Antitrust Division and its law enforcement partners will act quickly to root out anticompetitive behavior and use every tool available to hold wrongdoers accountable.”

    “Wrongdoers are looking to exploit opportunities and victims of natural disasters for their own personal gain,” said U.S. Attorney Ronald C. Gathe Jr. for the Middle District of Louisiana, who is also Executive Director of the National Center for Disaster Fraud (NCDF). “The Justice Department, including the NCDF, stands ready to prevent these bad actors from fraudulent activity. We are here to support victims of natural disasters during these difficult times together with our state, local and federal partners, and agencies. In an effort to assist the most vulnerable neighbors who are susceptible to these types of fraudulent schemes, we encourage you to be diligent in reporting suspicious activity on their behalf.”

    “As Americans seek safety from natural disasters, we’re hearing troubling reports of price gouging for essentials that are necessary for people to get out of harm’s way — from hotels to groceries to gas,” said FTC Chair Lina M. Khan. “No American should have to worry about paying grossly inflated prices when fleeing a hurricane. In partnership with state enforcers, the FTC will keep fighting to ensure that Americans can get the relief they need without being ripped off by bad actors exploiting a crisis.”

    “Price gouging during a natural disaster is just plain wrong, and excessive price increases can be unfair under the law,” said CFPB Director Rohit Chopra. “The CFPB will be on the lookout for financial companies that take advantage of natural disasters to rip people off.”

    Possible types of natural disaster scams include:

    • Fraudulent charities soliciting donations for disaster victims that often imitate the names of charities linked to the disaster;
    • Scammers impersonating government officials, offering disaster relief in exchange for personal information or money;
    • Scammers promoting non-existent businesses or investment opportunities related to disaster recovery, such as rebuilding or flood-proofing;
    • Price gouging for essential goods and services needed by disaster victims; and
    • Businesses using supply chain disruptions as a cover for collusion to overcharge customers.

    To avoid scams and frauds while you’re recovering from a hurricane or another natural disaster, remember only scammers will insist you pay for services by wire transfer, gift card, payment app, cryptocurrency or in cash. Avoid anyone who promises they can help you qualify for relief for a fee. That’s a scam. You are not required to pay a fee to get disaster relief. Never sign your insurance check over to someone else. Be sure to research contractors and get estimates from more than one before signing a contract for work. Get a written contract for repairs and read it carefully before signing it.

    The Justice Department established the NCDF in the wake of Hurricane Katrina to deter, investigate and prosecute fraud in the wake of disasters. More than 50 federal, state and local agencies participate in the NCDF, which reminds the public to be aware of and report any instances of alleged fraudulent activity related to relief operations and funding for victims. Complaints of fraud may be reported online at http://www.justice.gov/DisasterComplaintForm. Complaints may also be reported to the NCDF at (866) 720-5721, a hotline that is staffed 24 hours a day, seven days a week.

    Consumers and businesses with concerns about potentially anticompetitive conduct like price-fixing, bid-rigging, or customer-allocation can report those concerns to the Antitrust Division’s Citizen Complaint Center at 1-888-647-3258 or by visiting http://www.justice.gov/atr/report-violations.

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI: Subsea7 awarded contract in the US Gulf of Mexico

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Luxembourg – 9 October 2024 – Subsea 7 S.A. (Oslo Børs: SUBC, ADR: SUBCY) announced today the award of a sizeable 1 contract for a subsea tieback development in the US Gulf of Mexico.

    Subsea7 will be responsible for transporting and installing the flowline, umbilical, and associated subsea components for the tieback. Project management and engineering work will begin immediately at Subsea7’s office in Houston, Texas, and offshore activity is expected to start in 2025.

    Craig Broussard, Vice President for Subsea7 Gulf of Mexico, said: “Our strategy of early engagement and close collaboration with clients allows us to approach projects with an open mind and a deep understanding of client needs. This helps us explore innovative, cost-effective ways to deliver optimized energy solutions.”

    1. Subsea7 defines a sizeable contract as being between $50 million and $150 million

    *******************************************************************************
    Subsea7 is a global leader in the delivery of offshore projects and services for the evolving energy industry, creating sustainable value by being the industry’s partner and employer of choice in delivering the efficient offshore solutions the world needs.

    Subsea7 is listed on the Oslo Børs (SUBC), ISIN LU0075646355, LEI 222100AIF0CBCY80AH62.

    *******************************************************************************

    Contact for investment community enquiries:
    Katherine Tonks
    Investor Relations Director
    Tel +44 20 8210 5568
    ir@subsea7.com

    Contact for media enquiries:
    Ashley Shearer
    Communications Manager
    Tel +1-713-300-6792
    ashley.shearer@subsea7.com

    Forward-Looking Statements: This document may contain ‘forward-looking statements’ (within the meaning of the safe harbour provisions of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995). These statements relate to our current expectations, beliefs, intentions, assumptions or strategies regarding the future and are subject to known and unknown risks that could cause actual results, performance or events to differ materially from those expressed or implied in these statements. Forward-looking statements may be identified by the use of words such as ‘anticipate’, ‘believe’, ‘estimate’, ‘expect’, ‘future’, ‘goal’, ‘intend’, ‘likely’ ‘may’, ‘plan’, ‘project’, ‘seek’, ‘should’, ‘strategy’ ‘will’, and similar expressions. The principal risks which could affect future operations of the Group are described in the ‘Risk Management’ section of the Group’s Annual Report and Consolidated Financial Statements. Factors that may cause actual and future results and trends to differ materially from our forward-looking statements include (but are not limited to): (i) our ability to deliver fixed price projects in accordance with client expectations and within the parameters of our bids, and to avoid cost overruns; (ii) our ability to collect receivables, negotiate variation orders and collect the related revenue; (iii) our ability to recover costs on significant projects; (iv) capital expenditure by oil and gas companies, which is affected by fluctuations in the price of, and demand for, crude oil and natural gas; (v) unanticipated delays or cancellation of projects included in our backlog; (vi) competition and price fluctuations in the markets and businesses in which we operate; (vii) the loss of, or deterioration in our relationship with, any significant clients; (viii) the outcome of legal proceedings or governmental inquiries; (ix) uncertainties inherent in operating internationally, including economic, political and social instability, boycotts or embargoes, labour unrest, changes in foreign governmental regulations, corruption and currency fluctuations; (x) the effects of a pandemic or epidemic or a natural disaster; (xi) liability to third parties for the failure of our joint venture partners to fulfil their obligations; (xii) changes in, or our failure to comply with, applicable laws and regulations (including regulatory measures addressing climate change); (xiii) operating hazards, including spills, environmental damage, personal or property damage and business interruptions caused by adverse weather; (xiv) equipment or mechanical failures, which could increase costs, impair revenue and result in penalties for failure to meet project completion requirements; (xv) the timely delivery of vessels on order and the timely completion of ship conversion programmes; (xvi) our ability to keep pace with technological changes and the impact of potential information technology, cyber security or data security breaches; (xvii) global availability at scale and commercially viability of suitable alternative vessel fuels; and (xviii) the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting. Many of these factors are beyond our ability to control or predict. Given these uncertainties, you should not place undue reliance on the forward-looking statements. Each forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date of this document. We undertake no obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

    This information is considered to be inside information pursuant to the EU Market Abuse Regulation and is subject to the disclosure requirements pursuant to Section 5-12 the Norwegian Securities Trading Act.

    This stock exchange release was published by Katherine Tonks, Investor Relations, Subsea7, on 9 October 2024 at 18:20 CET.

    Attachment

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI USA: Jefferson, The Fed’s Discount Window: 1990 to the Present

    Source: US State of New York Federal Reserve

    Thank you, Steve, for that kind introduction and for the opportunity to talk to this group today.1
    Let me start by saying that I am saddened by the tragic loss of life, destruction, and damage resulting from Hurricane Helene in North Carolina, and throughout this region. My thoughts are with the people and communities affected. For our part, the Federal Reserve and other federal and state financial regulatory agencies are working with banks and credit unions in the affected area to help make sure they can continue to meet the financial services needs of their communities.
    Yesterday I shared my historical perspective on the discount window at Davidson College.2 In 1913, when the Federal Reserve was established, the discount window was the main tool it used to provide the nation with a safer, more flexible, and more stable monetary and financial system. More than 110 years later, the discount window continues to play an important role in supporting the liquidity and stability of the banking system, and the effective implementation of monetary policy.
    Today I would like to discuss with you how the discount window has evolved in the 21st century, including recent steps the Federal Reserve Board has taken to solicit feedback from the public on discount window operations. Before I address our most recent efforts, however, I will review some important episodes in discount window history that brought us to where we are today.
    First, I will recount briefly events in the 1980s and early 1990s that provide important context for the reappraisal of the discount window in the early 2000s. Second, I will summarize revisions to the discount window that the Fed made in 2003 and some additional changes made since then. Third, I will describe efforts that the Fed has taken to ensure that the discount window remains effective today, including the request for information that the Board recently issued on operational aspects of the discount window and intraday credit. After completing my discussion of the discount window, I will conclude with my outlook for the U.S. economy.
    Events before the 2003 Discount Window RevisionsI would like to pick up today where I left off yesterday in my speech at Davidson College: the 1980s and early 1990s. This was a period of widespread problems in the commercial banking sector. Troubled institutions borrowed from the discount window for extended periods of time as the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) sought to find merger partners or otherwise manage the closure of these institutions. As a result, the discount window became associated strongly with lending to troubled institutions. Healthy banks’ reluctance to borrow from the discount window increased. The greater reluctance to borrow from the discount window made it less effective both as a monetary policy tool and as a crisis-fighting tool.3 This led to a reassessment of the discount window in the early 2000s and to eventual revisions implemented in 2003.
    A Reassessment of the Discount Window in the Early 2000sThe key challenge in the reassessment of the discount window was to establish a lending program that would not only operate effectively and support monetary policy implementation, but also mitigate moral hazard and provide sufficient controls to minimize risk to Reserve Banks and, ultimately, to American taxpayers. After the reassessment, the Fed implemented several changes aimed to achieve the right balance.
    The Board replaced the adjustment credit program, which was extended at a below-market rate, with a new type of discount window credit called primary credit. This new type of discount window credit became effective in 2003.4 It is available as a backup source of liquidity to depository institutions in generally sound financial condition at an above-market rate. Making the discount rate a penalty rate is more consistent with the long-standing practice of other major central banks. This feature was intended to reduce the need for administrative pressures based on Reserve Bank staff judgment of inappropriate usage when the discount rate was below market rates. Although those measures effectively limited usage that was deemed inappropriate at the time, they also presented communication challenges regarding when it was appropriate to use the discount window and perpetuated the perception that the Fed discouraged its use.
    Primary credit is a “no questions asked” facility in which eligible depository institutions are no longer required to have exhausted other sources of funding or be subject to restrictions on the use of the borrowed funds. The Fed initially set the primary credit rate 100 basis points above the target federal funds rate.5 Since March 2020, the Fed has set the primary credit rate at a level equal to the top of the target range for the federal funds rate.6
    At the same time primary credit was established, another new program, called secondary credit, replaced the extended credit program. Secondary credit is available to depository institutions that are not eligible for primary credit. It was initially available at an interest rate 50 basis points higher than the primary credit rate, which is the spread in effect today. In contrast to primary credit, extensions under secondary credit are subject to higher collateral discounts and may involve ongoing oversight on the use of funds obtained under the program, reflecting the less-sound condition of secondary credit borrowers. Typically, Reserve Banks review a depository institution’s plan to repay the loan and return to market sources of funding.
    This two-tiered structure of providing the no-questions-asked primary credit program for healthy depository institutions and the secondary credit program for less-than-healthy depository institutions was designed primarily to instill public confidence in the health of institutions borrowing from the primary credit program and to reduce the reluctance of healthy depository institutions to borrow.7 In addition, having two separate facilities would reinforce the notion that healthy and troubled depository institutions alike should regard borrowing from the Fed as an option in the event of a need for additional funds.
    In the early years of the switch to the new facilities, there were signs that healthy depository institutions became more willing to borrow from the discount window. For example, some research found that after the 2003 discount window revisions, banks borrowed more from the discount window when the federal funds rate spiked than they had previously.8 This finding suggests that the redesign of the discount window was effective in reducing banks’ reluctance to borrow. As a result, the discount window may have been more effective in placing a ceiling on short-term funding rates, aiding the implementation of monetary policy, and serving as a liquidity tool when needed.
    Nevertheless, it is important to acknowledge that it is difficult to measure reluctance to borrow from the discount window. When the interest rate on primary credit is above the target federal funds rate and the federal funds rate is close to its target, the aggregate volume of primary credit is expected to be low. In other words, a low average level of discount window borrowing does not necessarily mean that there is a reluctance to borrow; instead, it could simply reflect a situation in which depository institutions do not currently need to borrow. In addition, when there is an abundance of liquidity in the banking system, as is the case in the current ample-reserves monetary policy regime, depository institutions may have less need to obtain additional liquidity via the discount window. Again, this does not necessarily mean that there is a reluctance to borrow. Conversely, the presence of discount window borrowing does not necessarily reflect the absence of a reluctance to borrow. It could be the case that, although aggregate usage increases, there are still some depository institutions that are willing to pay well above the primary credit rate even when they could have borrowed readily from the discount window. For these reasons, it is important that we complement data with market outreach information to assess the effectiveness of the discount window.
    Changes and Challenges since the Introduction of Primary and Secondary CreditPrimary and secondary credit exist today, but some changes have been made to primary credit since its inception. For example, although the discount window was used extensively and played an important role in the emergency measures taken during the financial crisis of 2007–09, some depository institutions during this period still were willing to borrow funds from the market at rates above the discount rate.9 This suggested that there was a reluctance to borrow before the crisis, and that reluctance appeared to grow over the course of the crisis. To promote the restoration of orderly conditions in financial markets and provide depository institutions with greater assurance about the cost and availability of funding, the Board approved temporary changes to its primary credit discount window facility during the crisis.10 In addition, in late 2007, the Board established the Term Auction Facility (TAF).11
    Concerns about lending to troubled depository institutions reemerged after the 2007–09 financial crisis. In the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, which was enacted in 2010, Congress required the Fed to publish detailed individual institution borrowing data with a two-year lag.12 This action was intended to enhance the transparency and accountability of Federal Reserve lending while still preserving a measure of confidentiality to avoid discouraging depository institutions from borrowing.
    More recently, in March 2020, the Fed announced changes to the provision of primary credit that were intended to encourage depository institutions to use the discount window to meet demands for credit from households and businesses in connection with the COVID-19 pandemic. These changes included setting the primary credit rate at a level equal to the top of the federal funds target range—a step that enhanced the ability of the discount window to support trading within the Federal Open Market Committee’s (FOMC) target range for the federal funds rate—and communicating the terms of borrowing as 90 days, prepayable and renewable on a daily basis. To further encourage depository institutions to use the discount window, the Fed also made changes to its reporting of Reserve Bank–level aggregate weekly discount window borrowing. It consolidated amounts previously reported as “loans,” which include discount window borrowing, into a broader category of assets.13 The changes made in 2020 remain in effect.
    During and after the spring 2023 stress events, the discount window again played an important role in supporting both monetary policy and financial stability. Depository institutions that came under severe stress turned to the discount window. The discount window also served an important role in providing ready access to funding, especially for depository institutions experiencing spillovers from the bank failures. To further ensure that depository institutions had the ability to meet the needs of all their depositors, the Board announced the creation of a new emergency program, the Bank Term Funding Program (BTFP). Although the BTFP was established pursuant to the Board’s emergency lending authority in section 13(3) of the Federal Reserve Act, the BTFP used the discount window infrastructure to lend to eligible depository institution borrowers.14 By relying on the existing discount window infrastructure, the BTFP was able to begin operating right away. The program ceased extending new loans on March 11, 2024, as scheduled.
    Today the discount window continues to be an effective tool, but it is important to acknowledge that economic and banking conditions continue to evolve. Since the 2003 discount window reassessment, we have seen an increased focus on liquidity in banking regulation, including the advent of quantitative liquidity requirements for large banking organizations; technological changes in the banking system; a general trend toward faster and 24-7-365 payment systems; changes in the composition and posture of Federal Home Loan Bank lending; and the move to an ample-reserves monetary policy implementation regime.
    In light of these developments, the Federal Reserve System has taken important steps to ensure that the discount window performs its functions successfully in the 21st-century economy. For example, last year the Board, along with the other federal banking agencies and the National Credit Union Administration, issued guidance on contingency funding plans that encouraged depository institutions to be ready to borrow from the discount window.15 This includes taking steps to establish borrowing relationships with the Federal Reserve, such as providing certain legal documentation and ensuring that collateral to secure loans is ready to pledge. In connection with interagency initiatives, Reserve Banks have conducted outreach to depository institutions and made efforts to guide them in using the discount window.
    Data suggest that this encouragement is working. By the end of 2023, 3,900 banks, or roughly 80 percent of all banks, had completed the legal documentation required to borrow from the discount window.16 Of those, nearly 2,000 banks had pledged collateral, with an aggregate lendable value of over $2.6 trillion after applying appropriate discounts. These figures are notably above their levels at the end of 2021 and 2022. Although I am pleased to see the improvements in discount window readiness statistics, continued outreach is still important. To that effect, this summer, Federal Reserve Banks hosted an Ask the Fed® session to discuss the purpose of the discount window, its facilities, and recommendations for depository institutions on how to prepare to borrow from the Fed.17
    Additionally, the Federal Reserve System has made important investments to enhance the technology that supports discount window activities. Earlier this year, the System launched Discount Window Direct, which is an online portal for depository institutions to request and prepay loans as well as securely message their local Reserve Bank.18 Discount Window Direct generally is accessible 24 hours a day. We are actively encouraging the use of Discount Window Direct.
    Seeking Feedback on the Discount WindowTo complement our efforts to enhance discount window operations, the Federal Reserve Board recently announced that it is collecting feedback from the public on operational frictions associated with the discount window and intraday credit through the issuance of a request for information. As some of you may know, a request for information is a formal document through which a government agency solicits feedback. Members of the public can submit comments in response to the request for information until December 9, 2024.19
    The Board requests input on various discount window and intraday credit operational practices, such as the process for requesting, receiving, and repaying discount window loans as well as Reserve Bank discount window and intraday credit communications practices. Through the request for information, the Board hopes to gain further insight into the operational aspects that are the most costly or burdensome for depository institutions. This will help the Fed consider further improvements to promote efficiency and reduce burden on depository institutions. Ultimately, the Fed’s goal is to build on the current discount window operations and processes so that the discount window will continue to provide ready access to funding against a wide range of collateral in the future. I encourage members of the public to submit comments on the request for information, and I look forward to considering the feedback that we receive.
    Economic OutlookBefore concluding, let me share with you a summary of my outlook for the U.S. economy, as I did yesterday with the audience at Davidson. Economic activity continues to grow at a solid pace. Inflation has eased substantially. The labor market has cooled from its formerly overheated state.
    Personal consumption expenditures (PCE) prices rose 2.2 percent over the 12 months ending in August, well down from 6.5 percent two years earlier. Excluding the volatile food and energy categories, core PCE prices rose 2.7 percent, compared with 5.2 percent two years earlier. Our restrictive monetary policy stance played a role in restraining demand and in keeping longer-term inflation expectations well anchored, as reflected in a broad range of inflation surveys of households, businesses, and forecasters, as well as measures from financial markets. Inflation is now much closer to the FOMC’s 2 percent objective. I expect that we will continue to make progress toward that goal.
    While, overall, the economy continues to grow at a solid pace, the labor market has modestly cooled. Employers added an average of 186,000 jobs per month during July through September, a slower pace than seen early this year. The unemployment rate now stands at 4.1 percent, up from 3.8 percent in September 2023. Meanwhile, job openings declined by about 4 million since their peak in March 2022. The good news is that the rise in unemployment has been limited and gradual, and the level of unemployment remains historically low. Even so, the cooling in the labor market is noticeable.
    Congress mandated the Fed to pursue maximum employment and price stability. The balance of risks to our two mandates has changed—as risks to inflation have diminished and risks to employment have risen, these risks have been brought roughly into balance. The FOMC has gained greater confidence that inflation is moving sustainably toward our 2 percent goal. To maintain the strength of the labor market, my FOMC colleagues and I recalibrated our policy stance last month, lowering our policy interest rate by 1/2 percentage point.
    Looking ahead, I will carefully watch incoming data, the evolving outlook, and the balance of risks when considering additional adjustments to the federal funds target range, our primary tool for adjusting the stance of monetary policy. My approach to monetary policymaking is to make decisions meeting by meeting. As the economy evolves, I will continue to update my thinking about policy to best promote maximum employment and price stability.
    Thank you.
    ReferencesArtuç, Erhan, and Selva Demiralp (2010). “Provision of Liquidity through the Primary Credit Facility during the Financial Crisis: A Structural Analysis,” Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Economic Policy Review, vol. 16 (August), p. 43–53.
    Bernanke, Ben S. (2009a). “The Federal Reserve’s Balance Sheet,” speech delivered at the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond 2009 Credit Markets Symposium, Charlotte, N.C., April 3.
    ——— (2009b). “The Federal Reserve’s Balance Sheet: An Update,” speech delivered at the Federal Reserve Board Conference on Key Developments in Monetary Policy, Washington, October 8.
    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (2002a). “Extensions of Credit by Federal Reserve Banks; Reserve Requirements of Depository Institutions,” final rule, technical amendment (Docket Nos. R-1123 and R-1134), Federal Register, vol. 67 (November 7), pp. 67777–87.
    ——— (2002b). “Publication of Final Rule Amending Regulation A (Extensions of Credit by Federal Reserve Banks),” press release, October 31.
    ——— (2020). “Federal Reserve Actions to Support the Flow of Credit to Households and Businesses,” press release, March 15.
    ——— (2023). “Federal Reserve Board Announces It Will Make Available Additional Funding to Eligible Depository Institutions to Help Assure Banks Have the Ability to Meet the Needs of All Their Depositors,” press release, March 12.
    ——— (2024a). “Bank Term Funding Program: Frequently Asked Questions (PDF),” updated January 24.
    ——— (2024b). “Request for Information and Comment on Operational Aspects of Federal Reserve Bank Extensions of Discount Window and Intraday Credit,” request for information and comment (Docket No. OP-1838), Federal Register, vol. 89 (September 10), pp. 73415–18.
    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, National Credit Union Administration, and Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (2023). “Agencies Update Guidance on Liquidity Risks and Contingency Planning,” joint press release, July 28.
    Clouse, James A. (1994). “Recent Developments in Discount Window Policy (PDF),” Federal Reserve Bulletin, vol. 80 (November), pp. 965–77.
    Jefferson, Philip N. (2024). “A History of the Fed’s Discount Window: 1913-2000,” speech delivered at Davidson College, Davidson, N.C., October 8.
    Madigan, Brian F. (2009). “Bagehot’s Dictum in Practice: Formulating and Implementing Policies to Combat the Financial Crisis,” speech delivered at the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City’s Annual Economic Symposium, Jackson Hole, Wyo., August 21.

    1. The views expressed here are my own and are not necessarily those of my colleagues on the Federal Reserve Board or the Federal Open Market Committee. Return to text
    2. See Jefferson (2024). Return to text
    3. For more details about this period, see Clouse (1994). In response to the wave of depository institution failures, Congress placed legal limitations on Federal Reserve lending to troubled institutions. Specifically, section 142 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 (FDICIA) amended section 10B of the Federal Reserve Act to place restraints on discount window lending to undercapitalized and critically undercapitalized insured depository institutions. FDICIA also imposed liability on the Board of Governors for excess losses incurred by the FDIC that are attributable to lending beyond those limits. The provisions of FDICIA were intended to reduce moral hazard in the banking system and limit taxpayer losses. Return to text
    4. For more details, see the October 31, 2002, Federal Reserve press release (Board of Governors, 2002b) and the final rule implementing the changes (Board of Governors, 2002a). Return to text
    5. In 2003, when primary credit was implemented, there was a single federal funds target rate. The Federal Open Market Committee adopted a federal funds target range on December 16, 2008. Return to text
    6. For details on the change to the rate spread announced in March 2020, see the press release (Board of Governors, 2020). As will be discussed in greater detail later, before 2020, the spread between the primary credit rate and the target federal funds rate (or top of the target range) had changed a few times to address economic conditions during the 2007–09 financial crisis and the subsequent recovery. Return to text
    7. This design feature also would help Reserve Banks manage risk more easily by establishing a standardized approach and risk controls when lending through a facility reserved for troubled depository institutions. Loans to troubled depository institutions entail more risk to the lending Reserve Bank, and depository institutions that are undercapitalized or critically undercapitalized are subject to lending limitations under FDICIA. Return to text
    8. See Artuç and Demiralp (2010). Return to text
    9. See Bernanke (2009a) and Madigan (2009) for a retrospective that elaborates on some of the emergency measures taken during the 2007–09 financial crisis and the reasoning for discount window rate changes during the financial crisis. Return to text
    10. Throughout this crisis, the Board approved numerous reductions in the primary credit rate and narrowed the spread between the primary credit rate and the target federal funds rate twice. With the narrowing of the spread in August 2007 from 100 basis points to 50 basis points and in March 2008 to 25 basis points, the Board announced that the maximum term for primary credit loans would be extended, first to 30 days and then to 90 days, respectively. As economic conditions improved, in 2010, the Board increased the spread between the primary credit rate and the target federal funds rate to 50 basis points and shortened the maximum term for primary credit loans to overnight. Return to text
    11. The TAF provided fixed quantities of term credit to depository institutions through an auction mechanism and seemed to have largely addressed banks’ concern that borrowing from the Federal Reserve would imply weakness. According to Bernanke (2009b, paragraph 7), this was “partly because the sizable number of borrowers provides a greater assurance of anonymity, and possibly also because the three-day period between the auction and auction settlement suggests that the facility’s users are not using it to meet acute funding needs on a particular day.” Return to text
    12. See section 1103 of the Dodd-Frank Act, which amended section 11 of the Federal Reserve Act. Return to text
    13. The Board’s H.4.1 statistical release, “Factors Affecting Reserve Balances of Depository Institutions and Condition Statement of Federal Reserve Banks,” is published weekly. It presents a balance sheet for each Federal Reserve Bank, a consolidated balance sheet for all 12 Reserve Banks, an associated statement that lists the factors affecting reserve balances of depository institutions, and several other tables presenting information on the assets, liabilities, and commitments of the Federal Reserve Banks. For additional details on the consolidation of “loans” into a broader category of assets, see the March 19, 2020, H.4.1 announcement, available on the Board’s website at https://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/h41/20200319. Return to text
    14. As with the discount window, an eligible institution participated in the BTFP through its local Reserve Bank. The legal agreements and process for pledging securities in the BTFP also relied on those used in discount window lending. Nevertheless, the BTFP differed from the discount window in various ways, including the term of lending, scope of eligible collateral, collateral valuation, and interest rate. For more information on the differences between the BTFP and the discount window, see the response to question A.3 in Board of Governors (2024a, p. 3). For additional details on the BTFP, see the March 12, 2023, press release (Board of Governors, 2023). Return to text
    15. See Board of Governors and others (2023). Return to text
    16. The statistics in this paragraph are available on the Board’s website at https://www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/discount-window-readiness.htm. Return to text
    17. More information on Ask the Fed is available on the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis’s website at https://bsr.stlouisfed.org/askthefed/Auth/Logon. Return to text
    18. Additional details on Discount Window Direct can be found on the Federal Reserve Bank Services website at https://www.frbservices.org/central-bank/lending-central. Return to text
    19. See the information on discount window operations in section II.A of Board of Governors (2024b). Return to text

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Rep. Panetta and a Bipartisan Coalition Introduce Legislation to Foster Alignment of Middle East Partners, Counter Iran

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Jimmy Panetta (D-Calif)

    Washington, DC – United States Representative Jimmy Panetta (CA-19) introduced bipartisan, bicameral legislation to improve security and military readiness between the United States and Abraham Accords nations.  The Learning Integrated National Knowledge (LINK) Act would connect strategic, operational, and tactical senior commanders through an exchange program to foster greater integration and alignment. 

    This legislation was introduced as tensions continue to rise in the Middle East due to the actions by Iran and Iranian-backed proxies and follows the fourth anniversary of the historic Abraham Accords.  Leading this legislation alongside Rep. Panetta are Reps. Zach Nunn (IA-03), Brad Schneider (IL-10), Ann Wagner (MO-02), David Trone (MD-06), and Cathy McMorris Rodgers (WA-05).  Companion legislation has been introduced by Senators Jacky Rosen (D-NV) and Joni Ernst (R-IA) in the Senate.

    Iran and its proxy forces, including Hamas, Hezbollah, and the Houthis, continue to conduct terrorist operations across the Middle East, from firing missiles within Lebanon, to attacks against commercial vessels in the Red Sea.  Through the establishment of a subject matter expert exchange program, American senior military officials will be able to bolster capabilities and deepen cooperationto enable the U.S. and its allies to respond to continuing and unforeseen aggression more effectively.

    “The increasingly aggressive actions by Iran and its terrorist proxies threaten the stability, security, and economy of the broader Middle East,” said Rep. Panetta.  “A military expert exchange program between Abraham Accords countries will ensure leaders are coordinating an integrated response to counter these malign activities in the region.  These partnerships are vital to our efforts to further strengthen the diplomatic, defense, and economic relationships between the United States, Israel, and our Arab partners.”

    “The Iranian Regime and its proxies cannot be left unchecked,” said Rep. Nunn.  “As Israel continues to withstand attacks from Iran, Hamas, and Hezbollah, now is the time to bring together the best and brightest military minds within the Abraham Accords.  This partnership will bring a more secure and peaceful Middle East.”

    “The combined efforts last week by Israel, the United States, and other allies to intercept nearly 200 Iranian ballistic missiles before they could cause unimaginable destruction demonstrates the importance of strengthening the coordination between CENTCOM and our allies,” said Rep. Schneider.  “As Iran and its proxies—including Hezbollah and the Houthis—continue to escalate threats to Israel, and the entire Middle East, it is critical that our partners have access to experienced military experts who can offer sound guidance during these escalations.  Through the LINK Act, we are strengthening our ties with Abraham Accords nations, ensuring both Israel and our Arab allies have the expert support needed to address these evolving threats and maintain regional security.”

    “Iran’s unprecedented missile attack on Israel on October 1 shows the Ayatollah is bent on Israel’s destruction and is willing to drag the region into war to accomplish its violent agenda,” said Rep. Wagner.  “As Iran continues to attack Israel directly and through its proxies, regional security cooperation remains vital to stability in the Middle East—and the defense of American allies against aggression.  My work with colleagues in the Abraham Accords Caucus has shown me how important it is to have our experts work closely with our partners and allies in the region to develop sound strategies and tackle threats together.   The ongoing instability and fighting in the region demand a more effective path forward to address threats from dictatorial governments and terrorists and ensure the safety of our own citizens at home and abroad.  This bill will ensure our partners in the Middle East support one another as we work towards that goal.”

    “Now more than ever, leaders in the Middle East and around the world must work together against growing threats, including Iran,” said Rep. Trone.  “With that goal in mind, it is imperative that we continue to share vital resources and encourage international cooperation to better equip our intelligence and military operations. With the LINK Act, we’re doing just that.”

    “Iran’s ballistic missile attack on Israel was an escalation that threatens to plunge the entire Middle East into chaos. Now more than ever, we need to strengthen military coordination and defense planning between Abraham Accords countries to safeguard against these increasingly aggressive attacks by Iran and its terrorist proxies,” said Rep. McMorris Rodgers.  “The LINK Act is a critical bipartisan effort to ensure military experts are in place to protect the diplomatic and economic relationships we’ve worked so hard to promote, while showing the world that we unequivocally stand with Israel.”

    This legislation has been included in the House and Senate versions of the FY25 National Defense Authorization Act, building upon the work of the Armed Services Committee to integrate air and missile defense capabilities, maritime domain awareness, cyber and AI readiness, and space satellites to deter Iranian aggression.

    ###

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: NIO minister pledges UK Government to support Health and Social Care Reform 

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Fleur Anderson, was speaking after attending the Accelerating Change conference in Belfast today (9 October)

    Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State Fleur Anderson

    Northern Ireland Office Minister Fleur Anderson has pledged the UK Government will support the NI Executive to reform and transform public services.

    The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State was speaking after attending the Accelerating Change conference hosted by the Department of Health in Belfast on Wednesday.

    Minister Anderson paid tribute to the Health Minister Mike Nesbitt for “bringing together expert voices on health reform into one room.”

    She said: “The conference highlighted the need to accelerate change in the health service and this is something the UK Government is keen to support. 

    “I understand the scale of the challenge facing the health service across the UK and particularly in Northern Ireland.

    “This Government’s five missions provide ambitious, measurable and long-term objectives to tackle shared public service challenges, which exist right across the UK. 

    “We want to support the NI Executive and the Department of Health to transform the health service to provide better outcomes for local people.”

    Updates to this page

    Published 9 October 2024

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI Global: Ultra-processed foods: we have the technology to turn them from foe into friend

    Source: The Conversation – UK – By David Benton, Professor Emeritus (Human & Health Sciences), Medicine Health and Life Science, Swansea University

    Ultra-processed foods can be cheap, convenient and they usually taste good. PeopleImages.com – Yuri A/Shutterstock

    Ultra-processed foods are the latest nutritional villains, associated with several diseases of the modern world, from obesity to heart disease. However, many nutritionists question whether the term “ultra-processed” does any more than create confusion. It only considers the way food is produced, ignoring other important factors like calories and nutrients.

    My work suggests that instead of being viewed as the problem, ultra-processed foods could actually be part of the solution. With advances in food science, we have the technology to create low-calorie, nutritious and affordable processed foods.

    There is no consensus about how ultra-processed foods should be defined. But a common approach was proposed by the nutrition and public health scholar, Carlos Monteiro. He coined the term about 15 years ago, defining foods that undergo significant industrial processing and often contain multiple added ingredients. In Portugal, ultra-processed food make up about 10% of the average diet, whereas in Germany it’s 46%, the UK 50% and in the US 76%.

    Ultra-processed foods three major advantages – they are cheap, convenient and they usually taste good. Their affordability in particular is an important factor.

    Producing food in bulk reduces costs. For instance, the Heinz factory in Wigan is the largest baked bean factory in the world. It produces 3 million cans of baked beans a day, ensuring they are widely available and affordable.

    In 1961, scientists in Chorleywood, Hertfordshire developed a new method for making bread. Today, more than 80% of loaves in Britain are produced this way. These loaves are softer, last longer and cost less than traditional bread.

    The affordability of ultra-processed food makes them a staple for many, particularly people on lower incomes. As around 30% of children in the UK live in poverty, calls to remove such foods from diets need to address how poorer families will be able to afford fresher and more nutritious food. Current ultra-processed foods may not offer a perfect diet, but they do provide calories when money is scarce.




    Read more:
    Ultra-processed foods: here’s what the evidence actually says about them


    Convenience is another notable benefit of ultra-processed food. Preparing meals from scratch can be time-consuming, involving buying ingredients, cooking and cleaning up afterwards. Ultra-processed foods offer a shortcut, saving valuable time. This is especially important for parents trying to balance jobs and family life. For those with busy lives who are working long hours, time is a luxury that ultra-processed food can help reclaim.

    Finally, ultra-processed foods are designed to be tasty. We’re genetically inclined to be attracted to sweet and fatty foods. Having a pleasant taste is one of the reasons we select our food.

    This convenience, affordability and taste come at a cost, however, as ultra-processed foods are often high in sugar, salt and saturated fats, while lacking in fruits, vegetables and essential nutrients.

    Are all ultra-processed foods bad for us?

    It’s not always clear if it’s the “ultra-processed” nature of these foods or their high calorie and low nutrient content that causes health issues. Nutrition is more complex than just considering how food is processed. We also need to consider calories, fibre, vitamins, minerals and other essential nutrients.

    For example, while baked beans are considered ultra-processed, they’re also high in fibre – something often missing from UK diets – low in fat and calories, and a good source of plant-based protein.

    Inside the world’s largest baked bean factory in Wigan.

    Some studies suggest that many health problems linked to ultra-processed food, like obesity and diabetes, may be caused by excess calorie consumption rather than the processing itself. When people cut out ultra-processed foods, they often end up eating fewer calories, which could explain the health benefits they experience.

    The link between ultra-processed foods and poverty suggests that many of the health issues linked to ultra-processed food may be caused by factors associated with poverty itself. Poor nutrition is often just one part of a wider picture that includes limited access to healthcare, higher stress levels and fewer opportunities for physical activity – all of which can contribute to poor health.

    Can ultra-processing be used for good?

    Ultra-processing has been used to fortify foods in the UK for decades. For example, the Bread and Flour Regulations 1998 requires certain nutrients like calcium, iron, thiamine (vitamin B1) and niacin (vitamin B3) to be added to any non-wholemeal flour. This fortification plays an important role in public health, providing around 35% of calcium intake, 31% of iron and 31% of thiamine to the average UK diet. Without these added nutrients, the risk of deficiencies would rise.

    The UK government took a further step in 2022 by requiring folic acid be added to flour. It was a move aimed at preventing birth defects such as spina bifida, where a baby’s spine and spinal cord doesn’t develop properly in the womb, and anencephaly, where a baby is born without parts of the brain and skull.

    Breakfast cereals, often criticised for their sugar content, can also boost the intake of essential nutrients like vitamins B2, B12, folate and iron. Some experts would like to see mandatory food fortification be extended much further.

    Food scientists are exploring other ways to make ultra-processed foods healthier. One approach involves reducing sugar by making it taste sweeter more quickly, which means less sugar is needed to achieve the same taste.

    Another is using scientific techniques to increase the speed at which salt is released from food. Similarly, this results in it being tasted more quickly, leading to lower consumption.

    Other innovations to lower the calories in foods by changing the recipe include creating creamy, low-calorie sauces without dairy, or plant-based burgers that are virtually indistinguishable from their meat counterparts, but have fewer calories.

    These types of innovations show that ultra-processing doesn’t necessarily mean unhealthy and calorie-dense food – it’s about the choices made in production. If scientists focus on creating affordable, nutritious ultra-processed foods, they could become part of the solution to the obesity crisis, rather than the enemy.

    I have never had funding that has anything to do with ultra-processed foods. However, I have worked on other aspects of nutrition and have worked with the likes of Novartis, Danone, Yakult, Beneo and Pepisco. Much of my work has been on micro-nutrients or the glycaemic response to carbohydrate. 

    ref. Ultra-processed foods: we have the technology to turn them from foe into friend – https://theconversation.com/ultra-processed-foods-we-have-the-technology-to-turn-them-from-foe-into-friend-239683

    MIL OSI – Global Reports