NewzIntel.com

Category: Politics

  • MIL-OSI United Nations: Secretary-General Appoints Carlos G. Ruiz Massieu of Mexico Special Representative for Haiti, Integrated Office Chief

    Source: United Nations General Assembly and Security Council

    United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres announced today the appointment of Carlos G. Ruiz Massieu of Mexico as his new Special Representative for Haiti and Head of the United Nations Integrated Office in Haiti (BINUH).  He succeeds María Isabel Salvador of Ecuador, to whom the Secretary-General is grateful for her dedication and service.

    Mr. Ruiz Massieu brings to this position over 30 years of experience in public service and diplomacy, both in bilateral and multilateral contexts.  As Special Representative of the Secretary-General in Colombia since 2019, he led the United Nations Verification Mission in Colombia, monitoring the implementation of the Peace Agreement between the Government of Colombia and the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia–People’s Army (FARC-EP) guerrilla.  He provided good offices and political leadership in the recent peace dialogues of the Government of Colombia and the National Liberation Army, as well as with other illegal armed groups.  Prior to this assignment, he served as the Chairperson of the General Assembly’s Advisory Committee on Administrative and Budgetary Questions from 2013 to 2018.

    A distinguished career diplomat, Mr. Ruiz Massieu served in different positions in the Mexican Government prior to joining the United Nations, including at the Permanent Mission of Mexico to the United Nations.  Mr. Ruiz Massieu is a graduate in law from the Universidad Iberoamericana, Mexico City, and holds a Master of Arts in politics from the University of Essex in the United Kingdom, with a focus on Latin America.  In addition to Spanish, he speaks English and French.

    __________

    * This supersedes Press Release SG/A/1844-BIO/5164 of 10 December 2018.

    MIL OSI United Nations News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Congressman Brian Babin Votes YES on the One Big Beautiful Bill Act

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Representative Brian Babin (R-TX)

    Today, U.S. Congressman Brian Babin (TX-36) voted in favor of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, landmark legislation that advances President Trump’s America First agenda, delivers historic economic relief to American families, and puts an end to some of Washington’s most reckless and radical policies.

    The legislation stops taxpayer funding of the abortion industry, prevents the largest tax hike in American history, and shields small businesses from the crushing weight of federal overreach. It unleashes domestic energy production, restores law and order at the southern border, and reins in out-of-control government spending.

    “This bill puts America First in every sense,” said Rep. Babin. “It means bigger paychecks, lower taxes, secure borders, and strong national defense. It ends the Biden-era madness and delivers exactly what the American people have been asking for — common sense and accountability. With this vote, we’re protecting our children, defending our sovereignty, and restoring the American Dream for working families. I was proud to cast my vote for this historic bill, and I look forward to seeing it signed into law by President Trump.”

    Key provisions of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act include:

    · Delivering the largest tax cut in U.S. history for middle- and working-class Americans

    · Eliminating taxes on tips, overtime, and tax breaks for seniors

    · Stopping taxpayer funding of the abortion industry

    · Unleashing domestic oil, gas, and nuclear energy

    · Permanently funding mass deportations and codifying Trump’s border security policies

    · Hiring 10,000 ICE agents, 5,000 Customs officers, and 3,000 Border Patrol agents

    · Restoring fiscal sanity and slashing the deficit by $2 trillion

    · Funding for the Golden Dome Missile Defense System to confront 21st-century threats

    · Modernizing our air traffic control system

    · Banning taxpayer-funded sex changes for minors

    This is a defining moment for our country — a bill that keeps our promises, secures our future, and puts American families back in control.

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Rep. Sara Jacobs Votes Against Trump’s Budget that Strips Health Care, Food Assistance Away From Millions of People

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Congresswoman Sara Jacobs (D-CA-53)

    July 03, 2025

    Rep. Sara Jacobs (CA-51) voted against Republicans’ budget that cuts health care, food assistance, education, and consumer protection in order to pay for tax breaks for the ultra-rich and corporations. The bill now heads to President Trump’s desk for his signature.

    Rep. Sara Jacobs said: “The consequences of this bill will reverberate for generations, widening the chasm between our country’s two social classes: the rich and powerful, and everyone else. It will kick 17 million people off their health insurance and close rural hospitals, nursing homes, and health clinics. It will take away health care from 5-year-old Delilah and 2-year-old Cesar, whom I met earlier this year and who rely on Medi-cal to navigate and pay for their many health conditions. This bill will force the biggest cut ever to SNAP – our country’s biggest and best program to address food insecurity – when the San Diego Food Bank already serves 400,000 San Diegans every single month. And it would leave four million children without access to nutrition assistance and 18 million kids at risk of losing their free and reduced-price school lunches. Meanwhile, this bill would explode our deficit and reward the richest Americans and the biggest corporations that don’t need any government help.

    “I fundamentally believe that government can be a force for good and make people’s lives better, but this bill represents government at its worst. It cements inequality by eliminating the few levers that people have to escape and stay out of poverty. It saddles future generations with enormous debt and a sicker and hungrier workforce. And it further erodes the American people’s trust in government, paving the way for further authoritarian power-grabs. I know that people are feeling lost and demoralized right now, but there are still people in Congress – including me – fighting for you.”

    ###

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Garbarino Issues Statement on Final Passage of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Representative Andrew Garbarino (R-NY)

    WASHINGTON, D.C. – Congressman Andrew Garbarino (R‑NY‑02) issued the following statement after the House passed the One Big Beautiful Bill Act by a vote of 218–214, advancing the legislation to the President’s desk for his signature:

    “The One Big Beautiful Bill will provide much needed tax relief, safeguard essential programs, and strengthen our national security.

    “For nearly a decade, middle-class New Yorkers have borne the brunt of unfair double taxation. When Democrats had full control of Washington they failed to deliver a single dollar of SALT relief. After a hard-fought battle and months of negotiations, I’m proud to say that Republicans have quadrupled the SALT deduction cap to $40,000. This compromise will allow the vast majority of my constituents to deduct the full amount of their state and local taxes and provide much needed financial relief to hardworking Americans.

    “This bill also holds the line against higher taxes for working families by permanently locking in the 2017 tax cuts. It delivers on promises to address tax on tips, overtime pay, and car loan interest. It lifts up small businesses and strengthens SNAP and Medicaid to ensure these programs remain sustainable for generations to come and focused squarely on serving the vulnerable populations they were designed to help. Despite false claims to the contrary, this bill does not cut Medicaid benefits for pregnant women, children, seniors, people with disabilities, or low-income families. These targeted reforms are designed to protect benefits for those who truly need them while eliminating waste, fraud, and abuse that threaten the program long term.

    “At the same time, I remain concerned about the potential impact on New York State’s Essential Plan, but I am actively pursuing a fix that would ensure our state is not harmed by these provisions in the coming year. Continued access to affordable quality health care is a top priority.

    “Just as access to care must be protected, so too must the long-term stability of our energy supply. The future of American energy independence hinges on an all-of-the-above energy strategy. While some wanted a full repeal of key clean energy provisions, we fought back and secured language that will help preserve jobs, keep critical energy projects moving forward, and work to ensure American families and businesses have reliable access to power without the threat of blackouts or brownouts. This approach lays the groundwork to expand manufacturing and promote the development of AI and data centers across the United States. We didn’t get everything we wanted, but we got what we needed to make progress, and there will be more legislation to come that builds on these victories and addresses the remaining challenges.

    “In addition to domestic policy reforms, we are making a landmark investment in border security, public safety, and national defense at a time of escalating threats from hostile nation-states, transnational criminal groups, and terrorist actors targeting the United States. With the passage of this bill, Congress is delivering new resources and personnel to the border, building the wall, and modernizing our military to meet the challenges of today.

    “Lastly but importantly, this bill raises the debt ceiling to prevent default and protect the full faith and credit of the United States. Avoiding default is essential to maintaining economic stability, safeguarding retirement accounts, and ensuring continued support for our military and core government functions.

    “While not perfect, this bill includes real wins for Long Island and for the American people. I was proud to cast my ‘Yes’ vote to pass the One Big Beautiful Bill and send this critical legislation to the President’s desk.”

    ###

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Malliotakis Celebrates Passage of the Big Beautiful Bill

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Congresswoman Nicole Malliotakis (NY-11)

    (WASHINGTON, DC) – Congresswoman Nicole Malliotakis released the following statement after the final passage of the Big Beautiful Bill.

    “Today is a historic day for Staten Islanders, Brooklynites, and families across the nation who have been calling for meaningful tax relief. Our Big Beautiful Bill puts America first by strengthening our borders and military, and delivering tax relief for American workers, middle-class families, and senior citizens. We’re not only making President Trump’s 2017 tax cuts permanent but also ensuring 88% of senior citizens will no longer pay federal taxes on their Social Security income, as well as quadrupling the SALT deduction, to benefit 98% of taxpayers in our district. The legislation also raises the standard deduction, eliminates taxes on tips for service workers, provides relief for small businesses, and expands the Child Tax Credit all to ensure hardworking Americans keep more of their hard-earned money.

    We also save taxpayers $2 trillion by cutting waste and rooting out fraud and abuse throughout government. We fully protect the seniors, disabled, children, pregnant women, and those below the federal poverty level who rely on Medicaid, but take action to eliminate ineligible fraudsters and illegal immigrants from the rolls, and implement reasonable part time work requirements for able-bodied adults – all provisions supported by the vast majority of Americans.

     

    We also strengthen our national security by investing in our military, funding border barriers, hiring more law enforcement, and revitalizing our domestic energy production.

     

    Not passing this bill would have jeopardized all these America-First policies and led to a crushing $4 trillion tax increase on American families and businesses with New Yorkers seeing an average 22% tax hike.”

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • Aadhaar authentication hits 230 crore in June, face scans surge to all-time high

    Source: Government of India

    Source: Government of India (4)

    Aadhaar authentication transactions surged to nearly 230 crore in June 2025, marking a 7.8 percent year-on-year increase, according to data released by the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI).

    A total of 229.33 crore transactions were recorded during the month, surpassing both May 2025 and June 2024, highlighting the expanding footprint of Aadhaar in India’s digital ecosystem.

    With this, the cumulative Aadhaar authentication transactions since inception have crossed 15,452 crore, underscoring its central role in welfare delivery and access to services across sectors.

    The AI/ML-powered Face Authentication solution, developed in-house by UIDAI, also hit a record 15.87 crore transactions in June — a more than threefold jump from 4.61 crore a year ago. Since its launch, the face authentication modality has been used nearly 175 crore times.

    UIDAI said the face authentication tool, compatible with both Android and iOS devices, is being adopted by over 100 government and private entities — including ministries, financial institutions, oil marketing companies, and telecom operators — for seamless identity verification and service delivery.

    The month also saw over 39.47 crore Aadhaar e-KYC transactions, reaffirming its importance in streamlining customer onboarding and enhancing the ease of doing business, particularly in the banking and NBFC sectors.

  • MIL-OSI USA: Nadler Statement on Opposing Trump’s “Big Ugly Bill” and Its Cruel Betrayal of New Yorkers

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Jerrold Nadler (10th District of New York)

    WASHINGTON, DC — This afternoon, after Republicans tried to hide the cruelty of their agenda by debating the bill in the dead of night, I proudly cast my vote against Donald Trump’s Big Ugly Bill—because no one should be forced to lose health care, go hungry, or see their child priced out of college in order to fund permanent tax cuts for Republican donors and the ultra-wealthy.

    This bill is a historic betrayal of working Americans. It delivers the largest transfer of wealth from low-income families to the ultra-rich in our nation’s history, slashing incomes for the bottom sixty percent of earners while adding $4 trillion to the deficit, the largest increase ever passed by Congress. Republicans claim this was their only chance to extend tax cuts for the middle class. That’s false. They could have done it without gutting health care and food aid, and without adding to the deficit, if they had the courage to ask billionaires to pay their fair share.

    It strips health care from over 17 million people, including 1.5 million New Yorkers, as part of $1 trillion in Medicaid cuts nationwide. In New York alone, hospitals are projected to lose over $8 billion in funding, forcing closures, service reductions, and the elimination of programs for children, seniors, and people with chronic illnesses. Nursing homes and community health centers face similar threats. The bill also attacks reproductive freedom by blocking Medicaid patients from accessing care at Planned Parenthood health centers, cutting off cancer screenings, contraception, STI testing, and preventive care for millions who have nowhere else to turn. It also functions as a backdoor abortion ban, threatening to shut down one in four abortion providers nationwide. By some estimates, it could also result in more than $500 billion in cuts to Medicare.

    It slashes $2.1 billion a year from New York State and local governments by shifting SNAP costs onto them, gutting food aid for 300,000 households across our state. Families already struggling to afford groceries will see their benefits cut by an average of $220 per month, slashing support to less than $5 per day. One in seven New Yorkers relies on SNAP. And by stripping that funding, the bill threatens access to free and reduced-price school meals, forcing more children to learn on an empty stomach.

    It doesn’t stop there. The bill ends Pell Grants for 1.4 million students, eliminates income-driven repayment, and caps student borrowing, effectively slamming the door on higher education for students who can’t pay upfront. Medicaid cuts will also force states to raid education budgets just to keep health systems afloat. Campuses will close. Students will drop out. Our country needs more nurses, teachers, and engineers, not fewer. But this bill will shrink our skilled workforce and leave the U.S. less competitive in the global economy.

    It also decimates our clean energy economy, tearing up solar and wind projects, repealing tax credits, and eliminating key climate protections. It hands public lands back to Big Oil and halts progress toward energy independence. Experts warn it could cost 840,000 clean energy jobs in just five years. And families will pay the price. In New York alone, household energy bills will rise by $1.3 billion annually by 2030, $2.5 billion by 2035, and $12 billion over the life of the bill.

    Meanwhile, Republicans are spending $170 billion to ramp up family detention, mass deportations, and border militarization, giving ICE a bigger budget than the entire Canadian military. It’s unconscionable to spend billions expanding ICE’s surveillance and detention machine while slashing school lunches for children and ripping Medicaid away from cancer patients.

    Even the few crumbs Republicans offered to working families, like temporary SALT relief and short-term tax breaks on tips and overtime, expire after just four years. Yet the tax cuts for billionaires are permanent. Republicans continue to tout these short-term provisions as evidence they’re helping the middle class, but every so-called benefit for working Americans disappears quickly, while every giveaway to the ultra-wealthy is forever. And here’s the kicker: if Republicans had done nothing at all, the SALT cap would have expired this December. Instead, they passed a bill that leaves New Yorkers worse off.

    For months, I’ve been fighting this bill and listening to New Yorkers and people across the country who will suffer because of it. And behind these numbers are real lives. Patricia, 83 years old, lives in poverty in New York and relies on Medicaid just to get to her doctor. She told me, “I have no transportation other than help from Medicaid. I also live on only my Social Security and SNAP. If I lose this precious help, I will be homeless and surely die.” That’s the real cost of these cuts. I think of the father who told me he may have to sell his house to afford chemo for his child. I think of the senior who rationed insulin last winter to keep the heat on. This awful bill makes the rich richer and leaves everyone else behind.

    And to my Republican colleagues: come November 2026, you’ll have to answer for this vote. You’ll have to explain to the families who lost their health care, to the parents who lost child care, and to the students who lost their futures why you turned your backs when they needed you most. Because when hospitals close, when grocery bills spike, when classrooms empty and jobs disappear, your constituents will remember exactly who was responsible.

    I voted no because I came to Congress to fight for the people I serve, not to sell them out to further enrich the ultra-wealthy. And I will do everything in my power to shield New Yorkers from the harm this bill threatens to unleash, from pushing back against these cuts to working with local leaders to protect access to health care, food, education, and opportunity. New Yorkers deserve better. The American people deserve better. And I will never stop fighting to deliver for them.

    ###

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Jayapal Statement on the Big Bad Budget Betrayal

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Congresswoman Pramila Jayapal (7th District of Washington)

    WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Representative Pramila Jayapal (WA-07), a Member of the House Budget Committee, released the following statement after the House of Representatives passed the Big Bad Betrayal Bill 218-214:

    “This is a cruel, horrific betrayal that will leave Americans poorer and sicker. It will throw 17 million Americans off health care and increase health care costs for everyone. It will shutter over 300 rural hospitals, close over 500 nursing homes, and defund Planned Parenthood clinics that provide cancer screenings and basic reproductive care. It will slash food assistance for millions of hungry families, the largest cut in the history of the SNAP nutrition program. It will make electric bills more expensive in every single state, make it harder to pay for college, and substantially weaken our public schools. It will kill over a million good-paying jobs and destroy our planet for future generations. It will supercharge ICE’s kidnapping and disappearing of people of all legal statuses, giving $45 billion more to ICE to pad the pockets of the for-profit industrial prison complex that is detaining immigrants without due process. It will explode the deficit by trillions of dollars—all so that Republicans can give $5 trillion in tax breaks to the wealthiest millionaires and billionaires.  

    “The Big Bad Betrayal Bill is the largest ever transfer of wealth from poor and working people to the richest, and every single district and state—red, blue, and purple—will feel the effects. Under this legislation, the poorest Americans are dealt the biggest blow. Policies that are supposedly going to help working people—labeled “no tax on tips or overtime”—are instead another betrayal, structured to give very little help to very few people and set to expire in two years. When you add in the massive Medicaid and SNAP cuts, poor and middle class Americans will go backwards, not forward.

    “Everything in this bill is structured to lift up the wealthiest millionaires, billionaires, and giant corporations. Those tax cuts are permanent, not temporary, and they amount to gold bars while poor and working Americans get breadcrumbs. Every Republican who voted for this bill in the House and the Senate sold out their constituents to make their billionaire donors richer and to bend the knee to Donald Trump. Thanks to Trump, Republicans, and this bill, people will die.

    “The role of government should be to even the playing field for ALL Americans, to help Americans thrive, not just survive, and to create genuine opportunity for poor and working people. This bill does the exact opposite. I voted HELL NO and will never give up the fight to stand up for my constituents who deserve so much better.”

    Jayapal voted no on the legislation when it first passed the House in May.

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Brownley Statement on Final Passage of Republican Tax Scam

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Julia Brownley (D-CA)

    Washington, DC – Today, Congresswoman Julia Brownley (D-CA) issued the following statement following final passage of H.R. 1, Republicans’ sweeping tax reconciliation bill, which enacts the largest cuts to Medicaid and food assistance in American history.

    “Today, Republicans in Congress turned their backs on the people they were elected to serve, ramming through a reckless budget package that will leave America hungrier, sicker, and poorer. This wasn’t about policy or the public good. It was about appeasing Donald Trump and checking a political box, no matter the human cost.

    “Instead of course-correcting after the Senate returned an even more extreme version of the bill, House Republicans caved without remorse. They pushed through the largest cuts to Medicaid in our nation’s history, ripping away health care coverage from more than 17 million Americans, with millions more having to pay higher premiums, co-pays, and deductibles. They gutted food assistance with the largest cuts in American history, jeopardizing SNAP for 40 million people, including 16 million children, 8 million seniors, 4 million people with disabilities, and 1.2 million veterans. They increased the national debt by $3.4 trillion over ten years, all to deliver a massive unearned tax cut to billionaires.

    “Now, after gutting the social safety net and mortgaging our children’s future, they’re heading home to celebrate the Fourth of July. Meanwhile, working families are left to suffer the consequences.

    “By passing this egregious and outright awful bill, Republicans made one thing unmistakably clear: their loyalty lies with Donald Trump, not the American people. They have abandoned their duty to govern. They chose blind allegiance over responsibility, compassion, and common sense.

    “Every single House Democrat voted no on this cruel and despicable bill because the American people deserve better. This bill may be headed to Donald Trump’s desk, but our fight is far from over. I will keep fighting tooth and nail to push back against the cruelty, extremism, and misplaced priorities of Donald Trump and Republicans in Congress, and to fight for a future where every family has a fair shot.”

    ###

    Issues: 119th Congress, Budget

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Pressley Condemns Passage of Republicans’ Big, Ugly Bill: “This is Unforgivable”

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Congresswoman Ayanna Pressley (MA-07)

    Pressley Implored Colleagues to Reject Cruel Legislation and Helped Stall a Vote on the House Floor

    Press Conference Video (YouTube)

    WASHINGTON – Today, Congresswoman Ayanna Pressley (MA-07) issued the following statement on the final passage of Republicans’ Big, Ugly Bill that will rip healthcare and food assistance away from millions of people, including in Massachusetts, push reproductive healthcare further out of reach nationwide, and fuel Trump’s unlawful mass deportation agenda.

    Yesterday, Rep. Pressley joined colleagues at a press conference imploring the House to reject this cruel, harmful legislation, and the Congresswoman also joined the Congressional Black Caucus and over 100 colleagues in stalling a vote on the House floor. Rep. Pressley also filed an amendment to the bill this week with Rep. Diana DeGette to protect and expand reproductive healthcare.

    “Republicans have passed a bill that will be a death sentence—denying millions medical care, denying children food, and violently deporting immigrant families to destabilized countries,” said Congresswoman Pressley. “This is unforgivable. I remain yours in service to every family who calls the Massachusetts 7th home, and I will never stop fighting for you.”

    In Massachusetts, this bill is estimated to cause:

    • Over 320,000 people to lose health insurance
    • At least 103,000 to lose food assistance
    • 63,334 students to lose their Pell grants
    • 11,000 manufacturing and energy jobs to be cut
    • $1,400 in yearly premium increases for people covered by the ACA in the MA-07
    • $290 more per year in increased energy bills

    Congresswoman Pressley has been an outspoken critic of this harmful legislation since its inception.

    • Rep. Pressley joined colleagues at a press conference imploring the House to reject the cruel and harmful legislation.
    • Rep. Pressley joined the Congressional Black Caucus and over 100 colleagues in stalling a vote on the Big, Ugly Bill.  
    • Rep. Pressley and Rep. Diana DeGette, Co-Chairs of the Reproductive Freedom Caucus, filed an amendment to the bill to protect and expand reproductive healthcare.
    • Rep. Pressley issued a statement condemning the Senate’s passage of the Big, Ugly Bill and vowing to continue fighting it using every tool available.
    • Ahead of the third anniversary if the Dobbs decision, Rep. Pressley and her colleagues stood in solidarity with Planned Parenthood and condemned the proposed cuts to reproductive healthcare under Republicans’ Big, Ugly Bill.
    • Rep. Pressley and author Darrick Hamilton authored a Washington Post op-ed in which they discussed the regressive, ineffective “Trump Accounts” provision of Republicans’ reconciliation bill and urged Congress to instead embrace Baby Bonds to advance economic justice.
    • Rep. Pressley rallied with advocates from Caring Across Generations, Care Can’t Wait, and partner organizations to protest Trump’s and Republicans’ Big Ugly Bill that proposes disastrous cuts to Medicaid, SNAP, and other essential programs and would leave communities sicker, poorer, and more vulnerable.
    • Ahead of the House’s vote on the bill, Rep. Pressley delivered an impassioned speech on the House floor in which she made a direct appeal to her Republican colleagues to oppose this cruel and harmful bill.
    • Rep. Pressley delivered a floor speech in which she slammed the bill’s proposed Medicaid cuts, which would decimate reproductive healthcare in America and worsen maternal health outcomes.
    • Rep. Pressley co-hosted a press conference with Color of Change to oppose the Republicans’ cruel and harmful budget reconciliation package, which would gut critical programs like Medicaid and SNAP.
    • Rep. Pressley rallied with caregivers, advocates, and fellow lawmakers at a 24-hour vigil to protect Medicaid from Republicans’ cruel budget cuts that would devastate communities across this country.
    • In the House Oversight Committee’s markup of the Republican reconciliation bill, Rep. Pressley demanded Republicans answer to the families who would go hungry by way of this reconciliation bill – and she was met with silence.
    • In the House Financial Services Committee’s markup of the Republican reconciliation bill, Rep. Pressley condemned the bill’s proposed cuts to Medicaid and shared the story of Mary Marinelli, a 70-year-old hospice nurse from a Republican district in Michigan whose family depends on Medicaid to care for their autistic son.
    • In an impassioned speech on the House floor, Rep. Pressley slammed Republicans’ cruel and callous budget resolution that would slash Medicaid and other critical government services to pay for trillions of dollars in tax giveaways for Donald Trump’s billionaire donors.

    ###

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI Security: Orange County Man Charged in Federal Complaint Alleging He Helped $270 Million Medi-Cal Scam Involving Medication Reimbursement

    Source: US FBI

    LOS ANGELES – An Orange County man has been charged via federal criminal complaint with submitting over an 11-month span nearly $270 million in fraudulent claims to Medi-Cal for expensive prescription drugs containing generic ingredients that were not medically necessary and, in many instances, not provided to the purported recipients, the Justice Department announced today.

    Paul Richard Randall, 66, of Orange, is charged with health care fraud, a felony that carries a statutory maximum penalty of 10 years in federal prison.

    Randall made his initial appearance in United States District Court in Los Angeles on Friday and was ordered jailed without bond. His arraignment is scheduled for July 17.

    Today’s announcement was made as part of the Justice Department’s 2025 National Health Care Fraud Takedown, which resulted in criminal charges against 324 defendants, including 96 doctors, nurse practitioners, pharmacists, and other licensed medical professionals, in 50 federal districts and 12 State Attorneys General’s Offices across the United States, for their alleged participation in various health care fraud schemes involving over $14.6 billion in intended loss. The Takedown involved federal and state law enforcement agencies across the country and represents an unprecedented effort to combat health care fraud schemes that exploit patients and taxpayers.

    Demonstrating the significant return on investment that results from health care fraud enforcement efforts, the government seized more than $245 million in cash, luxury vehicles, cryptocurrency, and other assets as part of the coordinated enforcement efforts. As part of the whole-of-government approach to combating health care fraud announced today, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) also announced that it successfully prevented more than $4 billion from being paid in response to false and fraudulent claims and that it suspended or revoked the billing privileges of 205 providers in the months leading up to the Takedown. Civil charges against 20 defendants for $14.2 million in alleged fraud, as well as civil settlements with 106 defendants totaling $34.3 million, were also announced as part of the Takedown.

    “This record-setting Health Care Fraud Takedown delivers justice to criminal actors who prey upon our most vulnerable citizens and steal from hardworking American taxpayers,” said Attorney General Pamela Bondi. “Make no mistake – this administration will not tolerate criminals who line their pockets with taxpayer dollars while endangering the health and safety of our communities.”

    “Public health programs are designed to help the sick and needy, not to help unscrupulous individuals pad their pockets,” said United States Attorney Bill Essayli. “Working with our federal and state law enforcement partners, we will continue to crack down on those who cheat taxpayers via health care fraud.” 

    According to an affidavit filed with the complaint, Randall, Kyrollos Mekail, 37, of Moreno Valley, and Patricia Anderson, 57, of West Hills, took advantage of Medi-Cal’s suspension of its requirement that health care providers obtain prior authorization before providing certain health care services or medications as a condition of reimbursement. The suspension of the prior authorization requirements was part of an ongoing transition of Medi-Cal’s prescription drug program to a new payment system.

    Through a business called Monte Vista Pharmacy, Randall and his co-schemers exploited Medi-Cal’s prior authorization suspension by billing Medi-Cal tens of millions of dollars per month for dispensing high-reimbursement, non-contracted, generic drugs through Monte Vista Pharmacy. Some prescription medications purportedly were to treat pain and included Folite tablets, a vitamin available over the counter.

    Normally, these high-cost reimbursement medications would have required prior authorization under Medi-Cal’s old payment system. Medication involved in this scheme was medically unnecessary, frequently was not dispensed to patients, and procured by kickbacks. 

    From May 2022 to April 2023, Monte Vista billed Medi-Cal more than $269 million and was paid more than $178 million for 19 expensive, non-contracted drugs containing low-cost, generic ingredients that were not medically necessary, not provided, or both.

    Randall and others then laundered their illicit proceeds by transferring the proceeds of the Medi-Cal fraud scheme to a third party to pay kickbacks to Anderson, to promote the fraud scheme and to conceal and disguise the transfers from detection by law enforcement.

    A criminal complaint contains allegations. All defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.

    Relatedly, Anderson was charged in a two-count information charging her with health care fraud for her role in the scheme which was unsealed last week. Mekail pleaded guilty to criminal charges in August 2024 and awaits sentencing.

    The United States Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General (HHS-OIG), the FBI, and the California Department of Justice are investigating this matter.

    Assistant United States Attorney Roger A. Hsieh of the Major Frauds Section and Assistant Chief Niall M. O’Donnell and Trial Attorney Siobhan M. Namazi of the U.S. Department of Justice, Criminal Division, Fraud Section are prosecuting this case. Assistant United States Attorney James E. Dochterman of the Asset Forfeiture and Recovery Section is handling asset forfeiture matters in this case. 

    MIL Security OSI –

  • MIL-OSI: Wealth Megatrends Releases 2025 Forecast Update on Gold Prediction Amid Historic Surge in Central Bank Demand

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Palm Beach Gardens, July 03, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) —

    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

    SECTION 1 – INTRODUCTION

    The gold market has re-entered a cycle of historic attention as macroeconomic uncertainty accelerates worldwide. In early 2025, gold prices surged beyond $3,200 per ounce for the first time on record, prompting a surge in online interest, independent forecasts, and portfolio reassessments. This surge can be attributed to factors such as recent tariff escalations, currency reallocation by foreign governments, and geopolitical fragmentation, which have amplified concerns about the long-term stability of fiat systems. Simultaneously, capital outflows and bond yield distortions have complicated traditional wealth preservation strategies. Many investors, both institutional and retail, are actively revisiting gold as a potential counterbalance to portfolio risk, particularly in light of rising stagflation narratives.

    This trend is rooted in increasingly visible disruptions across both U.S. and international markets. Recent tariff escalations, currency reallocation by foreign governments, and geopolitical fragmentation have amplified concerns about the long-term stability of fiat systems. Simultaneously, capital outflows and bond yield distortions have complicated traditional wealth preservation strategies. Many investors, both institutional and retail, are actively revisiting gold as a potential counterbalance to portfolio risk, particularly in light of rising stagflation narratives.

    Gold’s long-term historical performance, a key factor in its investment potential, continues to draw analytical interest. Since 2000, the metal has averaged over 20% annualized returns in periods of monetary dislocation, with only four annual declines in the past 25 years. This statistical consistency has aligned with peak search periods around previous crises, including the 2008 financial collapse, the 2020 pandemic response, and inflation spikes of the 1970s, providing reassurance to potential investors.

    As the dollar weakens and equity markets exhibit erratic momentum, digital conversations have also expanded beyond physical gold. Investor attention is turning toward ancillary market sectors with cyclical ties to the price of gold, specifically gold mining equities, royalty streaming models, and historically correlated commodities. In response to this emerging wave of interest, financial analysts and newsletter platforms have begun re-evaluating the long-term implications of sustained gold appreciation under current monetary and geopolitical conditions.

    To explore the full gold forecast and related analysis from Sean Brodrick, visit the Wealth Megatrends research platform at: www.weissratings.com.

    SECTION 2 – COMPANY / PRODUCT ANNOUNCEMENT

    In its latest macroeconomic outlook, Wealth Megatrends, backed by the highly respected and seasoned precious metals researcher Sean Brodrick, has released an updated analysis. His projection of a potential rise in gold prices to $6,900 per ounce—more than double current levels-is a significant milestone in the gold market. This projection, based on more than two decades of field-based research across global mining markets, follows gold’s recent break past $3,200, a milestone Brodrick had publicly projected following key shifts in post-election market dynamics and intensifying global trade disruptions.

    Brodrick’s projections are informed by more than two decades of field-based research across global mining markets. They are developed in collaboration with Weiss Ratings, an independent financial analysis firm known for its longstanding data-driven forecasting models. Founded nearly a century ago, Weiss Ratings has established a reputation for identifying risk-adjusted investment trends early in their cycle across multiple sectors, including commodities. Wealth Megatrends, on the other hand, is a leading authority in macroeconomic trends and has a track record of accurate forecasts in the precious metals market.

    The latest gold outlook presented through Wealth Megatrends is framed within the broader thesis that structural volatility—driven by tariffs, debt accumulation, and rising capital flight—may continue to pressure fiat currencies and redirect both institutional and sovereign interest toward hard assets. Within that narrative, Brodrick identifies gold’s current trajectory as part of a long-form secular cycle, where historical comparisons to the 1970s, early 2000s, and post-2008 recovery periods offer a relevant benchmark.

    The forecast does not focus solely on bullion pricing. Instead, it emphasizes the importance of understanding how gold-related equities—specifically gold mining stocks—have historically shown outsized performance during similar macroeconomic phases. While physical gold has traditionally served as a wealth preservation tool, equities tied to its production have demonstrated the potential for amplified movement, often reflecting operational leverage and commodity price elasticity. This comprehensive view of the market, providing a holistic understanding, is crucial for investors seeking to maximize their returns and feel prepared for their investment decisions.

    Wealth Megatrends positions this update as part of its ongoing commitment to transparency in informational research within the investment landscape. All perspectives are based on publicly observable market behavior, historical analogs, and forward-looking interpretations of supply-demand dislocations currently underway in the precious metals ecosystem. This commitment ensures that our audience can trust the information we provide.

    SECTION 3 – TREND ANALYSIS / CONSUMER INTEREST

    As uncertainty continues to shape global markets, search behavior and investor sentiment have undergone a noticeable shift. Interest in “gold forecast,” “gold prediction 2025,” and “how to invest in gold mining stocks” has surged across digital platforms. Concurrently, investment forums, macroeconomic newsletters, and institutional reports have intensified their coverage of gold and related asset classes, driven by elevated concerns over inflation, currency depreciation, and geopolitical fragmentation.

    Beyond retail curiosity, sovereign actors are playing an increasingly visible role in gold market dynamics. According to international financial reporting, global central banks have significantly increased their gold reserves over the last five years, with holdings reaching multi-decade highs. Nations such as China, Russia, Saudi Arabia, and Hungary have expanded their stockpiles, while institutions like the IMF have noted a material decline in U.S. dollar reserve dominance. This broader pivot toward physical gold reflects a growing skepticism toward traditional currency systems, particularly after recent asset seizures and shifting global monetary policies.

    At the same time, prominent hedge fund managers and macro investors have reportedly rotated capital into precious metals and resource equities. Though motivations vary—from protection against dollar volatility to long-term diversification—the directional trend suggests a shared expectation of continued financial instability. These evolving behaviors have contributed to an ecosystem where gold-related content now performs at record engagement levels across both news outlets and investment research platforms.

    Notably, the discourse is also expanding beyond bullion. Mining stocks, streaming firms, and gold-sector ETFs have re-emerged in public conversations due to their historical pattern of outperforming the underlying metal during bull cycles. This pattern, often tied to operational leverage and production scalability, is once again being evaluated by market analysts seeking exposure to gold-aligned opportunities without the logistical or storage limitations of physical assets.

    Additional insights into long-cycle gold behavior, macro trends, and equity exposure models are available through the Wealth Megatrends monthly publication, produced by Weiss Ratings.

    SECTION 4 – TECHNOLOGY SPOTLIGHT

    Within the broader conversation about gold’s long-term role in financial strategy, renewed interest is emerging in an adjacent category: publicly traded gold mining companies. Historically, these companies have moved directionally with the price of gold but have shown the potential for outsized volatility—both upward and downward—due to the inherent operating leverage tied to commodity prices.

    Mining equities represent businesses engaged in the extraction, production, and refinement of gold, often operating across geographically diverse sites. Their revenue models are influenced not only by prevailing spot prices but also by internal efficiencies, fixed operating costs, jurisdictional stability, and resource scalability. This makes them a subject of focused interest for market analysts seeking to interpret how rising gold prices might impact corporate financial performance within the sector.

    In previous gold bull markets—such as those seen in the 1970s, early 2000s, and post-2008—specific gold mining equities exhibited exponential price action relative to the metal itself. This pattern, commonly attributed to margin expansion, arises when rising gold prices exceed fixed production costs. While the price of gold may increase incrementally, the profitability of certain miners can shift more dramatically under favorable conditions, depending on operational factors such as grade, jurisdiction, and scale of output.

    Recent digital commentary also reflects growing awareness of gold mining sub-sectors, including royalty and streaming companies. These entities do not engage directly in mining but instead finance producers in exchange for a fixed share of production, often at below-market rates. As a result, they tend to operate with reduced overhead and exposure, while still participating in the broader gold cycle.

    SECTION 5 – USER JOURNEY NARRATIVE / MARKET RECEPTION

    Public conversation around gold has shifted dramatically in recent quarters, with online forums, financial publications, and independent research platforms documenting a growing reappraisal of gold’s long-term role in diversified strategies. Once considered a niche or defensive holding, gold is increasingly being positioned by investors as a foundational asset in the face of mounting systemic uncertainty.

    The transition in tone—from peripheral interest to mainstream reconsideration—has coincided with several economic flashpoints. These include the recalibration of central bank policies, persistent inflation indicators, and pronounced volatility in both equity and fixed-income markets. As global confidence in fiat stability continues to waver, discourse around asset preservation has taken on new urgency. In this environment, physical gold is commonly cited as a symbolic safeguard, while gold-linked equities are being explored for their cyclical performance dynamics.

    This renewed attention is not limited to physical asset holders. Retail investors who previously focused on conventional equities or index strategies are now engaging with educational content around gold mining companies, royalty models, and global production footprints. Meanwhile, institutional portfolios have been observed increasing their allocations to tangible asset categories, sometimes through passive vehicles that provide exposure to diversified gold equity baskets.

    Notably, this shift in tone is not driven solely by performance metrics but by a broader cultural narrative about financial resilience, global realignment, and the search for assets that exist outside centralized systems.

    Wealth Megatrends is a subscription-based research newsletter published monthly by Weiss Ratings. It provides economic cycle analysis for informational purposes only.

    SECTION 6 – AVAILABILITY AND TRANSPARENCY

    Readers seeking additional context on gold market cycles, equity sector dynamics, or commodity-aligned investment frameworks can find expanded analysis in the Wealth Megatrends publication. The platform is designed to offer economic research and independent forecasting centered around macroeconomic cycles, resource asset classes, and long-term portfolio theory.

    All materials are presented for informational purposes only and are developed using a combination of historical market analysis, third-party data synthesis, and independent evaluation of publicly available company performance metrics. No materials constitute financial advice or investment guidance. Instead, Wealth Megatrends content is intended to support educational exploration for individuals seeking to understand the structural drivers behind evolving market behavior.

    SECTION 7 – FINAL OBSERVATIONS & INDUSTRY CONTEXT

    The renewed momentum behind gold and gold-aligned equities reflects a broader shift in investor expectations across global markets. What began as a defensive reaction to short-term economic stressors has evolved into a long-term reassessment of value preservation frameworks and asset decentralization strategies. Within this environment, commodities such as gold and, by extension, mining sector exposure have re-emerged as central discussion points in the allocation strategies of both institutional and individual investors.

    The movement is not isolated to metals alone. It parallels a growing trend toward so-called “clean-label assets”—investments perceived as tangible, auditable, and less reliant on third-party counterparty risk. This shift mirrors consumer demand in other sectors, where transparency, operational integrity, and verifiable origin are increasingly prioritized over yield projections or promotional narratives.

    As global policy tools face scrutiny and traditional diversification models come under pressure, the precious metals space may continue to serve as both a barometer and a response mechanism to macroeconomic volatility.

    SECTION 8 – PUBLIC COMMENTARY THEME SUMMARY

    Public commentary surrounding the current gold cycle reflects a diverse mix of enthusiasm, skepticism, and inquiry. A recurring theme among bullish observers is the belief that structural global instability—encompassing monetary policy and geopolitical shifts—has triggered a renewed case for gold as a long-term asset.

    At the same time, some participants express concern over the potential for near-term overvaluation. A recurring discussion point involves the pace of recent gains and whether market enthusiasm may be outpacing underlying supply-demand fundamentals.

    Discussions across digital channels also reflect an evolving understanding of how gold-related equities behave differently from physical bullion. Some have noted that while gold mining stocks can amplify exposure to the metal’s price, they may also introduce operational, jurisdictional, or liquidity risks not present in the physical commodity itself.

    Another frequently cited theme involves the role of silver and other precious metals within the current narrative. Some market observers have expressed curiosity about whether these secondary metals will follow gold’s trajectory or establish differentiated cycles based on industrial demand and production forecasts.

    ABOUT THE COMPANY

    Founded to help investors navigate complex economic cycles, Wealth Megatrends is a monthly research publication that provides independent, data-driven analysis across precious metals, energy, and global resource sectors. Veteran cycles analyst Sean Brodrick leads the newsletter and is part of the Weiss Ratings ecosystem, a firm originally established in 1971 and known for its transparent approach to financial modeling and risk assessment.

    The publication does not provide investment advice, treatment, or diagnostic services and is intended strictly for educational and informational purposes.

    Contact:

    The MIL Network –

  • MIL-OSI: Wealth Megatrends Releases 2025 Forecast Update on Gold Prediction Amid Historic Surge in Central Bank Demand

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Palm Beach Gardens, July 03, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) —

    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

    SECTION 1 – INTRODUCTION

    The gold market has re-entered a cycle of historic attention as macroeconomic uncertainty accelerates worldwide. In early 2025, gold prices surged beyond $3,200 per ounce for the first time on record, prompting a surge in online interest, independent forecasts, and portfolio reassessments. This surge can be attributed to factors such as recent tariff escalations, currency reallocation by foreign governments, and geopolitical fragmentation, which have amplified concerns about the long-term stability of fiat systems. Simultaneously, capital outflows and bond yield distortions have complicated traditional wealth preservation strategies. Many investors, both institutional and retail, are actively revisiting gold as a potential counterbalance to portfolio risk, particularly in light of rising stagflation narratives.

    This trend is rooted in increasingly visible disruptions across both U.S. and international markets. Recent tariff escalations, currency reallocation by foreign governments, and geopolitical fragmentation have amplified concerns about the long-term stability of fiat systems. Simultaneously, capital outflows and bond yield distortions have complicated traditional wealth preservation strategies. Many investors, both institutional and retail, are actively revisiting gold as a potential counterbalance to portfolio risk, particularly in light of rising stagflation narratives.

    Gold’s long-term historical performance, a key factor in its investment potential, continues to draw analytical interest. Since 2000, the metal has averaged over 20% annualized returns in periods of monetary dislocation, with only four annual declines in the past 25 years. This statistical consistency has aligned with peak search periods around previous crises, including the 2008 financial collapse, the 2020 pandemic response, and inflation spikes of the 1970s, providing reassurance to potential investors.

    As the dollar weakens and equity markets exhibit erratic momentum, digital conversations have also expanded beyond physical gold. Investor attention is turning toward ancillary market sectors with cyclical ties to the price of gold, specifically gold mining equities, royalty streaming models, and historically correlated commodities. In response to this emerging wave of interest, financial analysts and newsletter platforms have begun re-evaluating the long-term implications of sustained gold appreciation under current monetary and geopolitical conditions.

    To explore the full gold forecast and related analysis from Sean Brodrick, visit the Wealth Megatrends research platform at: www.weissratings.com.

    SECTION 2 – COMPANY / PRODUCT ANNOUNCEMENT

    In its latest macroeconomic outlook, Wealth Megatrends, backed by the highly respected and seasoned precious metals researcher Sean Brodrick, has released an updated analysis. His projection of a potential rise in gold prices to $6,900 per ounce—more than double current levels-is a significant milestone in the gold market. This projection, based on more than two decades of field-based research across global mining markets, follows gold’s recent break past $3,200, a milestone Brodrick had publicly projected following key shifts in post-election market dynamics and intensifying global trade disruptions.

    Brodrick’s projections are informed by more than two decades of field-based research across global mining markets. They are developed in collaboration with Weiss Ratings, an independent financial analysis firm known for its longstanding data-driven forecasting models. Founded nearly a century ago, Weiss Ratings has established a reputation for identifying risk-adjusted investment trends early in their cycle across multiple sectors, including commodities. Wealth Megatrends, on the other hand, is a leading authority in macroeconomic trends and has a track record of accurate forecasts in the precious metals market.

    The latest gold outlook presented through Wealth Megatrends is framed within the broader thesis that structural volatility—driven by tariffs, debt accumulation, and rising capital flight—may continue to pressure fiat currencies and redirect both institutional and sovereign interest toward hard assets. Within that narrative, Brodrick identifies gold’s current trajectory as part of a long-form secular cycle, where historical comparisons to the 1970s, early 2000s, and post-2008 recovery periods offer a relevant benchmark.

    The forecast does not focus solely on bullion pricing. Instead, it emphasizes the importance of understanding how gold-related equities—specifically gold mining stocks—have historically shown outsized performance during similar macroeconomic phases. While physical gold has traditionally served as a wealth preservation tool, equities tied to its production have demonstrated the potential for amplified movement, often reflecting operational leverage and commodity price elasticity. This comprehensive view of the market, providing a holistic understanding, is crucial for investors seeking to maximize their returns and feel prepared for their investment decisions.

    Wealth Megatrends positions this update as part of its ongoing commitment to transparency in informational research within the investment landscape. All perspectives are based on publicly observable market behavior, historical analogs, and forward-looking interpretations of supply-demand dislocations currently underway in the precious metals ecosystem. This commitment ensures that our audience can trust the information we provide.

    SECTION 3 – TREND ANALYSIS / CONSUMER INTEREST

    As uncertainty continues to shape global markets, search behavior and investor sentiment have undergone a noticeable shift. Interest in “gold forecast,” “gold prediction 2025,” and “how to invest in gold mining stocks” has surged across digital platforms. Concurrently, investment forums, macroeconomic newsletters, and institutional reports have intensified their coverage of gold and related asset classes, driven by elevated concerns over inflation, currency depreciation, and geopolitical fragmentation.

    Beyond retail curiosity, sovereign actors are playing an increasingly visible role in gold market dynamics. According to international financial reporting, global central banks have significantly increased their gold reserves over the last five years, with holdings reaching multi-decade highs. Nations such as China, Russia, Saudi Arabia, and Hungary have expanded their stockpiles, while institutions like the IMF have noted a material decline in U.S. dollar reserve dominance. This broader pivot toward physical gold reflects a growing skepticism toward traditional currency systems, particularly after recent asset seizures and shifting global monetary policies.

    At the same time, prominent hedge fund managers and macro investors have reportedly rotated capital into precious metals and resource equities. Though motivations vary—from protection against dollar volatility to long-term diversification—the directional trend suggests a shared expectation of continued financial instability. These evolving behaviors have contributed to an ecosystem where gold-related content now performs at record engagement levels across both news outlets and investment research platforms.

    Notably, the discourse is also expanding beyond bullion. Mining stocks, streaming firms, and gold-sector ETFs have re-emerged in public conversations due to their historical pattern of outperforming the underlying metal during bull cycles. This pattern, often tied to operational leverage and production scalability, is once again being evaluated by market analysts seeking exposure to gold-aligned opportunities without the logistical or storage limitations of physical assets.

    Additional insights into long-cycle gold behavior, macro trends, and equity exposure models are available through the Wealth Megatrends monthly publication, produced by Weiss Ratings.

    SECTION 4 – TECHNOLOGY SPOTLIGHT

    Within the broader conversation about gold’s long-term role in financial strategy, renewed interest is emerging in an adjacent category: publicly traded gold mining companies. Historically, these companies have moved directionally with the price of gold but have shown the potential for outsized volatility—both upward and downward—due to the inherent operating leverage tied to commodity prices.

    Mining equities represent businesses engaged in the extraction, production, and refinement of gold, often operating across geographically diverse sites. Their revenue models are influenced not only by prevailing spot prices but also by internal efficiencies, fixed operating costs, jurisdictional stability, and resource scalability. This makes them a subject of focused interest for market analysts seeking to interpret how rising gold prices might impact corporate financial performance within the sector.

    In previous gold bull markets—such as those seen in the 1970s, early 2000s, and post-2008—specific gold mining equities exhibited exponential price action relative to the metal itself. This pattern, commonly attributed to margin expansion, arises when rising gold prices exceed fixed production costs. While the price of gold may increase incrementally, the profitability of certain miners can shift more dramatically under favorable conditions, depending on operational factors such as grade, jurisdiction, and scale of output.

    Recent digital commentary also reflects growing awareness of gold mining sub-sectors, including royalty and streaming companies. These entities do not engage directly in mining but instead finance producers in exchange for a fixed share of production, often at below-market rates. As a result, they tend to operate with reduced overhead and exposure, while still participating in the broader gold cycle.

    SECTION 5 – USER JOURNEY NARRATIVE / MARKET RECEPTION

    Public conversation around gold has shifted dramatically in recent quarters, with online forums, financial publications, and independent research platforms documenting a growing reappraisal of gold’s long-term role in diversified strategies. Once considered a niche or defensive holding, gold is increasingly being positioned by investors as a foundational asset in the face of mounting systemic uncertainty.

    The transition in tone—from peripheral interest to mainstream reconsideration—has coincided with several economic flashpoints. These include the recalibration of central bank policies, persistent inflation indicators, and pronounced volatility in both equity and fixed-income markets. As global confidence in fiat stability continues to waver, discourse around asset preservation has taken on new urgency. In this environment, physical gold is commonly cited as a symbolic safeguard, while gold-linked equities are being explored for their cyclical performance dynamics.

    This renewed attention is not limited to physical asset holders. Retail investors who previously focused on conventional equities or index strategies are now engaging with educational content around gold mining companies, royalty models, and global production footprints. Meanwhile, institutional portfolios have been observed increasing their allocations to tangible asset categories, sometimes through passive vehicles that provide exposure to diversified gold equity baskets.

    Notably, this shift in tone is not driven solely by performance metrics but by a broader cultural narrative about financial resilience, global realignment, and the search for assets that exist outside centralized systems.

    Wealth Megatrends is a subscription-based research newsletter published monthly by Weiss Ratings. It provides economic cycle analysis for informational purposes only.

    SECTION 6 – AVAILABILITY AND TRANSPARENCY

    Readers seeking additional context on gold market cycles, equity sector dynamics, or commodity-aligned investment frameworks can find expanded analysis in the Wealth Megatrends publication. The platform is designed to offer economic research and independent forecasting centered around macroeconomic cycles, resource asset classes, and long-term portfolio theory.

    All materials are presented for informational purposes only and are developed using a combination of historical market analysis, third-party data synthesis, and independent evaluation of publicly available company performance metrics. No materials constitute financial advice or investment guidance. Instead, Wealth Megatrends content is intended to support educational exploration for individuals seeking to understand the structural drivers behind evolving market behavior.

    SECTION 7 – FINAL OBSERVATIONS & INDUSTRY CONTEXT

    The renewed momentum behind gold and gold-aligned equities reflects a broader shift in investor expectations across global markets. What began as a defensive reaction to short-term economic stressors has evolved into a long-term reassessment of value preservation frameworks and asset decentralization strategies. Within this environment, commodities such as gold and, by extension, mining sector exposure have re-emerged as central discussion points in the allocation strategies of both institutional and individual investors.

    The movement is not isolated to metals alone. It parallels a growing trend toward so-called “clean-label assets”—investments perceived as tangible, auditable, and less reliant on third-party counterparty risk. This shift mirrors consumer demand in other sectors, where transparency, operational integrity, and verifiable origin are increasingly prioritized over yield projections or promotional narratives.

    As global policy tools face scrutiny and traditional diversification models come under pressure, the precious metals space may continue to serve as both a barometer and a response mechanism to macroeconomic volatility.

    SECTION 8 – PUBLIC COMMENTARY THEME SUMMARY

    Public commentary surrounding the current gold cycle reflects a diverse mix of enthusiasm, skepticism, and inquiry. A recurring theme among bullish observers is the belief that structural global instability—encompassing monetary policy and geopolitical shifts—has triggered a renewed case for gold as a long-term asset.

    At the same time, some participants express concern over the potential for near-term overvaluation. A recurring discussion point involves the pace of recent gains and whether market enthusiasm may be outpacing underlying supply-demand fundamentals.

    Discussions across digital channels also reflect an evolving understanding of how gold-related equities behave differently from physical bullion. Some have noted that while gold mining stocks can amplify exposure to the metal’s price, they may also introduce operational, jurisdictional, or liquidity risks not present in the physical commodity itself.

    Another frequently cited theme involves the role of silver and other precious metals within the current narrative. Some market observers have expressed curiosity about whether these secondary metals will follow gold’s trajectory or establish differentiated cycles based on industrial demand and production forecasts.

    ABOUT THE COMPANY

    Founded to help investors navigate complex economic cycles, Wealth Megatrends is a monthly research publication that provides independent, data-driven analysis across precious metals, energy, and global resource sectors. Veteran cycles analyst Sean Brodrick leads the newsletter and is part of the Weiss Ratings ecosystem, a firm originally established in 1971 and known for its transparent approach to financial modeling and risk assessment.

    The publication does not provide investment advice, treatment, or diagnostic services and is intended strictly for educational and informational purposes.

    Contact:

    The MIL Network –

  • MIL-Evening Report: Mauna Loa Observatory captured the reality of climate change. The US plans to shut it down

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Alex Sen Gupta, Associate Professor in Climate Science, UNSW Sydney

    Izabela23/Shutterstock

    The greenhouse effect was discovered more than 150 years ago and the first scientific paper linking carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere with climate change was published in 1896.

    But it wasn’t until the 1950s that scientists could definitively detect the effect of human activities on the Earth’s atmosphere.

    In 1956, United States scientist Charles Keeling chose Hawaii’s Mauna Loa volcano for the site of a new atmospheric measuring station. It was ideal, located in the middle of the Pacific Ocean and at high altitude away from the confounding influence of population centres.

    Data collected by Mauna Loa from 1958 onward let us clearly see the evidence of climate change for the first time. The station samples the air and measures global CO₂ levels. Charles Keeling and his successors used this data to produce the famous Keeling curve – a graph showing carbon dioxide levels increasing year after year.

    But this precious record is in peril. US President Donald Trump has decided to defund the observatory recording the data, as well as the widespread US greenhouse gas monitoring network and other climate measuring sites.

    We can’t solve the existential problem of climate change if we can’t track the changes. Losing Mauna Loa would be a huge loss to climate science. If it shuts, other observatories such as Australia’s Kennaook/Cape Grim will become even more vital.

    The Keeling Curve tracking steadily rising carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere came from data gathered at Mauna Loa.
    Scripps Institution of Oceanography at UC San Diego, CC BY-NC-ND

    What did Mauna Loa show us?

    The first year of measurements at Mauna Loa revealed something incredible. For the first time, the clear annual cycle in atmospheric CO₂ was visible. As plants grow in summer, they absorb CO₂ and draw it out of the atmosphere. As they die and decay in winter, the CO₂ returns to the atmosphere. It’s like Earth is breathing.

    Most land on Earth is in the Northern Hemisphere, which means this cycle is largely influenced by the northern summer and winter.

    The annual cycle of carbon dioxide is largely due to plant growth and decay in the northern hemisphere.

    It only took a few years of measurements before an even more profound pattern emerged.

    Year on year, CO₂ levels in the atmosphere were relentlessly rising. The natural in-out cycle continued, but against a steady increase.

    Scientists would later figure out that the ocean and land together were absorbing almost half of the CO₂ produced by humans. But the rest was building up in the atmosphere.

    Crucially, isotopic measurements meant scientists could be crystal clear about the origin of the extra carbon dioxide. It was coming from humans, largely through burning fossil fuels.

    Mauna Loa has now been collecting data for more than 65 years. The resulting Keeling curve graph is the most iconic demonstration of how human activities are collectively affecting the planet.

    When the last of the Baby Boomer generation were being born in the 1960s, CO₂ levels were around 320 parts per million. Now they’re over 420 ppm. That’s a level unseen for at least three million years. The rate of increase far exceeds any natural change in the past 50 million years.

    The reason carbon dioxide is so important is that this molecule has special properties. Its ability to trap heat alongside other greenhouse gases means Earth isn’t a frozen rock. If there were no greenhouse gases, Earth would have an average temperature of -18°C, rather than the balmy 14°C under which human civilisation emerged.

    The greenhouse effect is essential to life. But if there are too many gases, the planet becomes dangerously hot. That’s what’s happening now – a very sharp increase in gases exceptionally good at trapping heat even at low concentrations.

    Greenhouse gases are the reason Earth isn’t an icebox. But the rate humans are emitting them is leading to very rapid changes.
    Reid Wiseman/NASA, CC BY-NC-ND

    Keeping our eyes open

    It’s not enough to know CO₂ is climbing. Monitoring is essential. That’s because as the planet warms, both the ocean and the land are expected to take up less and less of humanity’s emissions, letting still more carbon accumulate in the air.

    Continuous, high-precision monitoring is the only way to spot if and when that happens.

    This monitoring provides the vital means to verify whether new climate policies are genuinely influencing the atmospheric CO₂ curve rather than just being touted as effective. Monitoring will also be vital to capture the moment many have been working towards when government policies and new technologies finally slow and eventually stop the increase in CO₂.

    The US administration’s plans to defund key climate monitoring systems and roll back green energy initiatives presents a global challenge.

    Without these systems, it will be harder to forecast the weather and give seasonal updates. It will also be harder to forecast dangerous extreme weather events.

    Scientists in the US and globally have sounded the alarm about what the closure would do to science. This is understandable. Stopping data climate collection is like breaking a thermometer because you don’t like knowing you’ve got a fever.

    If the US follows through, other countries will need to carefully reconsider their commitments to gathering and sharing climate data.

    Australia has a long record of direct atmospheric CO₂ measurement, which began in 1976 at the Kennaook/Cape Grim Baseline Air Pollution Station in north-west Tasmania. This and other climate observations will only become more valuable if Mauna Loa is lost.

    It remains to be seen how Australia’s leaders respond to the US retreat from climate monitoring. Ideally, Australia would not only maintain but strategically expand its monitoring systems of atmosphere, land and oceans.

    Alex Sen Gupta receives funding from the Australian Research Council.

    Katrin Meissner receives funding from the Minderoo Foundation and has received funding from the Australian Research Council in the past.

    Timothy Raupach receives funding from QBE Insurance, Guy Carpenter, and the Australian Research Council.

    – ref. Mauna Loa Observatory captured the reality of climate change. The US plans to shut it down – https://theconversation.com/mauna-loa-observatory-captured-the-reality-of-climate-change-the-us-plans-to-shut-it-down-260403

    MIL OSI Analysis – EveningReport.nz –

  • MIL-Evening Report: Mauna Loa Observatory captured the reality of climate change. The US plans to shut it down

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Alex Sen Gupta, Associate Professor in Climate Science, UNSW Sydney

    Izabela23/Shutterstock

    The greenhouse effect was discovered more than 150 years ago and the first scientific paper linking carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere with climate change was published in 1896.

    But it wasn’t until the 1950s that scientists could definitively detect the effect of human activities on the Earth’s atmosphere.

    In 1956, United States scientist Charles Keeling chose Hawaii’s Mauna Loa volcano for the site of a new atmospheric measuring station. It was ideal, located in the middle of the Pacific Ocean and at high altitude away from the confounding influence of population centres.

    Data collected by Mauna Loa from 1958 onward let us clearly see the evidence of climate change for the first time. The station samples the air and measures global CO₂ levels. Charles Keeling and his successors used this data to produce the famous Keeling curve – a graph showing carbon dioxide levels increasing year after year.

    But this precious record is in peril. US President Donald Trump has decided to defund the observatory recording the data, as well as the widespread US greenhouse gas monitoring network and other climate measuring sites.

    We can’t solve the existential problem of climate change if we can’t track the changes. Losing Mauna Loa would be a huge loss to climate science. If it shuts, other observatories such as Australia’s Kennaook/Cape Grim will become even more vital.

    The Keeling Curve tracking steadily rising carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere came from data gathered at Mauna Loa.
    Scripps Institution of Oceanography at UC San Diego, CC BY-NC-ND

    What did Mauna Loa show us?

    The first year of measurements at Mauna Loa revealed something incredible. For the first time, the clear annual cycle in atmospheric CO₂ was visible. As plants grow in summer, they absorb CO₂ and draw it out of the atmosphere. As they die and decay in winter, the CO₂ returns to the atmosphere. It’s like Earth is breathing.

    Most land on Earth is in the Northern Hemisphere, which means this cycle is largely influenced by the northern summer and winter.

    The annual cycle of carbon dioxide is largely due to plant growth and decay in the northern hemisphere.

    It only took a few years of measurements before an even more profound pattern emerged.

    Year on year, CO₂ levels in the atmosphere were relentlessly rising. The natural in-out cycle continued, but against a steady increase.

    Scientists would later figure out that the ocean and land together were absorbing almost half of the CO₂ produced by humans. But the rest was building up in the atmosphere.

    Crucially, isotopic measurements meant scientists could be crystal clear about the origin of the extra carbon dioxide. It was coming from humans, largely through burning fossil fuels.

    Mauna Loa has now been collecting data for more than 65 years. The resulting Keeling curve graph is the most iconic demonstration of how human activities are collectively affecting the planet.

    When the last of the Baby Boomer generation were being born in the 1960s, CO₂ levels were around 320 parts per million. Now they’re over 420 ppm. That’s a level unseen for at least three million years. The rate of increase far exceeds any natural change in the past 50 million years.

    The reason carbon dioxide is so important is that this molecule has special properties. Its ability to trap heat alongside other greenhouse gases means Earth isn’t a frozen rock. If there were no greenhouse gases, Earth would have an average temperature of -18°C, rather than the balmy 14°C under which human civilisation emerged.

    The greenhouse effect is essential to life. But if there are too many gases, the planet becomes dangerously hot. That’s what’s happening now – a very sharp increase in gases exceptionally good at trapping heat even at low concentrations.

    Greenhouse gases are the reason Earth isn’t an icebox. But the rate humans are emitting them is leading to very rapid changes.
    Reid Wiseman/NASA, CC BY-NC-ND

    Keeping our eyes open

    It’s not enough to know CO₂ is climbing. Monitoring is essential. That’s because as the planet warms, both the ocean and the land are expected to take up less and less of humanity’s emissions, letting still more carbon accumulate in the air.

    Continuous, high-precision monitoring is the only way to spot if and when that happens.

    This monitoring provides the vital means to verify whether new climate policies are genuinely influencing the atmospheric CO₂ curve rather than just being touted as effective. Monitoring will also be vital to capture the moment many have been working towards when government policies and new technologies finally slow and eventually stop the increase in CO₂.

    The US administration’s plans to defund key climate monitoring systems and roll back green energy initiatives presents a global challenge.

    Without these systems, it will be harder to forecast the weather and give seasonal updates. It will also be harder to forecast dangerous extreme weather events.

    Scientists in the US and globally have sounded the alarm about what the closure would do to science. This is understandable. Stopping data climate collection is like breaking a thermometer because you don’t like knowing you’ve got a fever.

    If the US follows through, other countries will need to carefully reconsider their commitments to gathering and sharing climate data.

    Australia has a long record of direct atmospheric CO₂ measurement, which began in 1976 at the Kennaook/Cape Grim Baseline Air Pollution Station in north-west Tasmania. This and other climate observations will only become more valuable if Mauna Loa is lost.

    It remains to be seen how Australia’s leaders respond to the US retreat from climate monitoring. Ideally, Australia would not only maintain but strategically expand its monitoring systems of atmosphere, land and oceans.

    Alex Sen Gupta receives funding from the Australian Research Council.

    Katrin Meissner receives funding from the Minderoo Foundation and has received funding from the Australian Research Council in the past.

    Timothy Raupach receives funding from QBE Insurance, Guy Carpenter, and the Australian Research Council.

    – ref. Mauna Loa Observatory captured the reality of climate change. The US plans to shut it down – https://theconversation.com/mauna-loa-observatory-captured-the-reality-of-climate-change-the-us-plans-to-shut-it-down-260403

    MIL OSI Analysis – EveningReport.nz –

  • MIL-Evening Report: NZ will soon have no real interisland rail-ferry link – why are we so bad at infrastructure planning?

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Timothy Welch, Senior Lecturer in Urban Planning, University of Auckland, Waipapa Taumata Rau

    Hagen Hopkins/Getty Images)

    Another week, another Cook Strait ferry breakdown. As the winter maintenance season approaches and the Aratere prepares for its final months of service, New Zealand faces a self-imposed crisis.

    The government has spent NZ$507.3 million on cancelled iReX ferry plans, the country’s fleet has an average age of 28 years, and the earliest New Zealanders can hope for promised replacements is 2029.

    The Marlborough Chamber of Commerce warns unreliable ferries already shake tourist confidence. Several more years of duct-tape solutions won’t help.

    The recent pattern of breakdowns and cancellations has become so routine that New Zealand risks normalising what should be viewed as a national crisis: a serious infrastructure failure.

    It is also a textbook example of how short-term political cycles, coupled with chronic under-investment, create far more expensive problems than the ones they promise to solve.

    Cost blowouts

    While ministers claim to have spared taxpayers a $4 billion blowout on new ferries, Treasury papers show almost 80% of the cost escalation lay in seismic upgrades for wharves, not in the vessels themselves. Those land-side works will be required no matter what ferries the country eventually orders.

    Justifying the original contract cancellation, Finance Minister Nicola Willis quipped that iReX was a Ferrari when a Toyota Corolla would do. But the cost of finding a suitable Corolla is adding up fast.

    Annual maintenance costs are projected to nearly double to $65 million, just to keep the existing ageing ferries running. Additionally, $300 million had to be earmarked to cover fees for breaking the original ferry replacement contract.

    By retiring the Aratere this year – New Zealand’s only rail-capable ferry – the government is also severing the interisland rail link for almost five years.

    KiwiRail will “road-bridge” rail freight, an expensive workaround that involves loading train cars onto trucks, putting those trucks on ferries, then reversing the process at the other end. This will increase truck traffic, produce more emissions and add more wear to already strained infrastructure.

    Forcing more than $14 billion worth of annual freight from rail to road could also negatively affect New Zealand’s climate change commitments. Freight moved by rail generates only about 25% of the CO₂ per tonne-kilometre of the same load produced when hauled by truck.

    The cancelled hybrid ferries would have also cut emissions by 40%. Instead, New Zealand is locking in higher emissions for another half decade or longer.

    Unrealistic timelines

    The ferry saga reflects New Zealand’s infrastructure problem in a nutshell. The country tends to underestimate costs, create unfeasible timelines, then shows dismay when projects blow up or limp home at double the price.

    Auckland exemplifies the pattern. The city has seen decades of cancelled harbour crossing proposals and a scrapped light rail project, with nothing to show but consultancy fees.

    When New Zealand does build –Transmission Gully, for example – the final bill bears little resemblance to initial quotes. The 27 kilometre motorway north of Wellington was nearly 50% over budget and took eight years to build – two years longer than promised.

    The systematic underestimation of costs reflects a flawed approach to infrastructure planning. Politicians need quick wins within three-year electoral cycles, while infrastructure projects take decades to deliver.

    Projects are approved based on lowball estimates, with the outcome inherited by another administration. This has crossed party lines and created a system that rewards short-term thinking and punishes long-term planning.

    Just consider the second crossing for Auckland Harbour. For 35 years, the government has commissioned study after study – from the 1988 tunnel plans to the 2010 business cases – each time backing away when the price tag appeared, or the government changed.

    The iReX cancellation marks the first time the government has actually signed contracts and then walked away. As with the second Auckland Harbour crossing, each delay has only made the inevitable solution more expensive.

    Other countries have, to a degree, addressed this problem. Infrastructure Australia, for example, provides independent cost assessments and long-term planning that transcends political cycles. New Zealand’s Infrastructure Commission, established in 2019, lacks similar teeth and independence.

    Ultimately this isn’t really about ferries. It’s about how New Zealand consistently fails to deliver, on time and at cost, the infrastructure that keeps its economy moving.

    Timothy Welch does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    – ref. NZ will soon have no real interisland rail-ferry link – why are we so bad at infrastructure planning? – https://theconversation.com/nz-will-soon-have-no-real-interisland-rail-ferry-link-why-are-we-so-bad-at-infrastructure-planning-260279

    MIL OSI Analysis – EveningReport.nz –

  • MIL-Evening Report: NZ will soon have no real interisland rail-ferry link – why are we so bad at infrastructure planning?

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Timothy Welch, Senior Lecturer in Urban Planning, University of Auckland, Waipapa Taumata Rau

    Hagen Hopkins/Getty Images)

    Another week, another Cook Strait ferry breakdown. As the winter maintenance season approaches and the Aratere prepares for its final months of service, New Zealand faces a self-imposed crisis.

    The government has spent NZ$507.3 million on cancelled iReX ferry plans, the country’s fleet has an average age of 28 years, and the earliest New Zealanders can hope for promised replacements is 2029.

    The Marlborough Chamber of Commerce warns unreliable ferries already shake tourist confidence. Several more years of duct-tape solutions won’t help.

    The recent pattern of breakdowns and cancellations has become so routine that New Zealand risks normalising what should be viewed as a national crisis: a serious infrastructure failure.

    It is also a textbook example of how short-term political cycles, coupled with chronic under-investment, create far more expensive problems than the ones they promise to solve.

    Cost blowouts

    While ministers claim to have spared taxpayers a $4 billion blowout on new ferries, Treasury papers show almost 80% of the cost escalation lay in seismic upgrades for wharves, not in the vessels themselves. Those land-side works will be required no matter what ferries the country eventually orders.

    Justifying the original contract cancellation, Finance Minister Nicola Willis quipped that iReX was a Ferrari when a Toyota Corolla would do. But the cost of finding a suitable Corolla is adding up fast.

    Annual maintenance costs are projected to nearly double to $65 million, just to keep the existing ageing ferries running. Additionally, $300 million had to be earmarked to cover fees for breaking the original ferry replacement contract.

    By retiring the Aratere this year – New Zealand’s only rail-capable ferry – the government is also severing the interisland rail link for almost five years.

    KiwiRail will “road-bridge” rail freight, an expensive workaround that involves loading train cars onto trucks, putting those trucks on ferries, then reversing the process at the other end. This will increase truck traffic, produce more emissions and add more wear to already strained infrastructure.

    Forcing more than $14 billion worth of annual freight from rail to road could also negatively affect New Zealand’s climate change commitments. Freight moved by rail generates only about 25% of the CO₂ per tonne-kilometre of the same load produced when hauled by truck.

    The cancelled hybrid ferries would have also cut emissions by 40%. Instead, New Zealand is locking in higher emissions for another half decade or longer.

    Unrealistic timelines

    The ferry saga reflects New Zealand’s infrastructure problem in a nutshell. The country tends to underestimate costs, create unfeasible timelines, then shows dismay when projects blow up or limp home at double the price.

    Auckland exemplifies the pattern. The city has seen decades of cancelled harbour crossing proposals and a scrapped light rail project, with nothing to show but consultancy fees.

    When New Zealand does build –Transmission Gully, for example – the final bill bears little resemblance to initial quotes. The 27 kilometre motorway north of Wellington was nearly 50% over budget and took eight years to build – two years longer than promised.

    The systematic underestimation of costs reflects a flawed approach to infrastructure planning. Politicians need quick wins within three-year electoral cycles, while infrastructure projects take decades to deliver.

    Projects are approved based on lowball estimates, with the outcome inherited by another administration. This has crossed party lines and created a system that rewards short-term thinking and punishes long-term planning.

    Just consider the second crossing for Auckland Harbour. For 35 years, the government has commissioned study after study – from the 1988 tunnel plans to the 2010 business cases – each time backing away when the price tag appeared, or the government changed.

    The iReX cancellation marks the first time the government has actually signed contracts and then walked away. As with the second Auckland Harbour crossing, each delay has only made the inevitable solution more expensive.

    Other countries have, to a degree, addressed this problem. Infrastructure Australia, for example, provides independent cost assessments and long-term planning that transcends political cycles. New Zealand’s Infrastructure Commission, established in 2019, lacks similar teeth and independence.

    Ultimately this isn’t really about ferries. It’s about how New Zealand consistently fails to deliver, on time and at cost, the infrastructure that keeps its economy moving.

    Timothy Welch does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    – ref. NZ will soon have no real interisland rail-ferry link – why are we so bad at infrastructure planning? – https://theconversation.com/nz-will-soon-have-no-real-interisland-rail-ferry-link-why-are-we-so-bad-at-infrastructure-planning-260279

    MIL OSI Analysis – EveningReport.nz –

  • MIL-Evening Report: I’ve seen the brain damage contact sports can cause – we all need to take concussion and CTE more seriously

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Alan Pearce, Professor, Adjunct Research Fellow, School of Health Science, Swinburne University of Technology

    AAP Image/The Conversation, CC BY

    Concussion in sport continues to make headlines, whether it be class actions, young men flocking to the highly violent “RunIt” activity or debate about whether Australian rules football should remove the “bump” once and for all.

    Bringing this weighty issue to greater prominence are the former athletes who bravely share their long-term health struggles after careers in sport – cognitive impairments, mental health issues or concerns about neurodegenerative disease, specifically chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE).

    Yet for all the progress made by many sports in recent years, it feels like we still have not fully grasped the understanding of CTE – or maybe we don’t want to.

    Remind me again, what is CTE?

    CTE is a neurodegenerative brain disease, just like dementia, motor neurone disease (MND) and Parkinson’s disease.

    Expert groups agree on the links between traumatic brain injury and increased risk of Alzheimer’s disease (and other dementias), and the growing evidence of links to MND and Parkinson’s.

    People who have never had a traumatic brain injury can still regrettably suffer from these diseases. However, while CTE is rare in the general population, those with a history of repetitive impacts to the brain are more at risk.

    These impacts may not be diagnosed brain injuries or concussions, but rather non-concussive impacts (smaller hits that do not produce signs or symptoms of concussion).

    Contrary to anecdotal opinion, an athlete’s concussion history is not the crucial variable in risk and severity of CTE.

    Emerging international evidence, including my own recently published studies, show the risk of developing CTE (and its severity) is linked to exposure: the age a person starts full contact sport and the length of a playing career.

    The grey area of concussion, CTE and mental health

    Currently, CTE cannot be diagnosed in living people.

    However in understanding the progression of the disease in those who have passed away with CTE, families have described signs and symptoms including cognitive impairments such as:

    • Parkinsonism
    • memory loss
    • trouble with planning and organising tasks
    • impulsive behaviours
    • anger and irritability
    • emotional instability
    • substance misuse
    • suicidal thoughts/behaviour.

    While these signs and symptoms can overlap with those we associate with mental health, this does not necessarily mean the affected person had “mental health concerns”.

    The continued awareness in men’s mental health is a good thing broadly but it has sometimes misappropriated CTE as a mental health issue. For example, some fundraising games in the names of athletes who have died with CTE are being channelled to mental health charities and institutes, confusing the wider community.

    Consequently two recent tragic stories, one from the family of deceased former AFL player Shane Tuck and the other from Amanda Green, the widow of the late NRL player and coach Paul Green, needed to be told.

    Their stories contradicted widely held beliefs in the media and among fans that Tuck or Green were suffering with a psychiatric disease prior to their untimely deaths. In fact, they had CTE.

    An uncomfortable conversation

    So, why aren’t we talking about CTE more?

    The answer is, unfortunately it is an inconvenient truth.

    Considering CTE is entirely preventable if we remove exposure risk of repetitive hits to the head, the solution is to further modify many of our most popular sports to make head impacts much rarer.

    There is sizeable opposition to this idea.

    “Now is not the time to discuss such ‘political’ issues,” is the response I usually get from academics and colleagues involved in these sports, and even football loving friends, when I try to raise awareness.

    This continued hesitation only slows the science of CTE further.

    If an athlete’s family has been courageous in donating their brain to the Australian Sports Brain Bank and CTE has been found, the standard response from sports organisations is:

    the (insert sport here) takes athlete health and wellbeing as its greatest priority […] the (insert sport here) has implemented strict concussion protocols and continues research into athletes’ brain health.

    Even a Senate parliamentary inquiry has done little to change the situation.

    In fact, while most sports have tried to become safer through rule changes, progress more broadly has plateaued or even regressed in recent years.

    Take one recent example in the NRL, when some in the rugby league community made light of the multiple concussions suffered by Victor Radley. After playing his 150th game, he posed smiling with a t-shirt detailing the number of concussions he had suffered during his career. His club, the Sydney Roosters, posted the photo on Instagram before it was later removed.

    Even more worrying is a new controversial activity called “RunIt”, which involves two men running full speed at each other with the intention of knocking over (or more aptly knocking out) the opponent.

    A recent death of a New Zealand teenager playing RunIt has highlighted the dangers.



    Read more:
    Head knocks and ultra-violence: viral games Run It Straight and Power Slap put sports safety back centuries

    What more can be done?

    With the help of the Concussion Legacy Foundation, experts around the world, including myself, have produced a CTE prevention protocol. This does not mean banning any sports but rather modifying components that will reduce exposure risk.

    Here are five ideas I believe would make a difference.

    1. Reducing contact loads in training, particularly in pre-season training.

    2. Modify contact sports for children until the age of 14. This potentially removes six to eight years of incidental and unnecessary hits to kids’ heads. They can still play and learn all the fundamental motor skills and enjoy the psychological benefits of sport before graduating to the full version of the game at 14.

    3. Influential media commentators need to upskill themselves around CTE and to not be afraid to mention CTE rather than deferring to “concussion protocols”.

    4. Medical and allied health practitioners do not regularly screen for concussion or contact sport playing history when assessing a patient who is struggling with movement disorders, chronic headaches/fatigue or cognitive/behavioural impairments. Repetitive head impact history should be screened just like alcohol and drug use history.

    5. When an athlete suddenly and tragically dies, we need to include, along with emergency help lines, information for help and support for those unsure about CTE.

    Unfortunately, if we don’t have the political will to acknowledge CTE and act, more families will be grieving tragic deaths of athletes. These families may not even be aware of CTE.

    This does not make me anti-sport, but pro-athlete. Let’s all become pro-athlete for the sake of our sports and the people who play them.

    Alan Pearce is currently unfunded. Alan is a non-executive director for the Concussion Legacy Foundation (unpaid position) and Adjunct research manager for the Australian Sports Brain Bank (unpaid position). He has previously received funding from Erasmus+ strategic partnerships program (2019-1-IE01-KA202-051555), Sports Health Check Charity (Australia), Australian Football League, Impact Technologies Inc., and Samsung Corporation, and is remunerated for expert advice to medico-legal practices.

    – ref. I’ve seen the brain damage contact sports can cause – we all need to take concussion and CTE more seriously – https://theconversation.com/ive-seen-the-brain-damage-contact-sports-can-cause-we-all-need-to-take-concussion-and-cte-more-seriously-259785

    MIL OSI Analysis – EveningReport.nz –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Attorney General Bonta Opposes Trump Administration Effort to Roll Back Fair Housing Protections

    Source: US State of California

    Regulations developed to prevent discriminatory housing practices, racially segregated neighborhoods 

    OAKLAND — California Attorney General Rob Bonta today co-led a coalition of 21 attorneys general in sending a letter to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) opposing a proposed rule that would rollback critical fair housing regulations that prohibit discrimination in the marketing of affordable housing. The Affirmative Fair Housing Marketing (AFHM) regulations require owners of federally assisted housing to target advertising and outreach regarding their properties to communities that otherwise might not have learned about the opportunity to live there. The proposed rule would repeal these regulations, which are designed to ensure that federally assisted housing providers do not market available housing to only certain groups as had been done in the past to maintain racially segregated neighborhoods.

    “The Trump Administration is working to roll back critical fair housing regulations that prohibit discrimination — protections put in place in the 70’s to combat the insidious persistence of segregated neighborhoods — protections that are essential today to ensure that housing opportunities for underserved communities remain accessible,” said Attorney General Bonta. “The national housing crisis is driven by a shortage of housing supply and unaffordability that disproportionately affects communities of color. Today I urge the Administration to look closely at the mandate they inherited in the Fair Housing Act and understand that letting a broader range of buyers know about affordable housing opportunities that are available to them is necessary to ensure that these opportunities remain accessible for all Americans.” 

    Historically, government at all levels throughout the United States, along with private developers and mortgage lending institutions, played an active role in creating segregated living patterns, which perpetuated inequalities in access to opportunity. The Fair Housing Act, through AFHM regulations, requires HUD and recipients of federal funds from HUD to administer their programs in a manner to affirmatively further fair housing by ensuring that the agency and its program participants take meaningful actions to overcome patterns of segregation, promote fair housing choice, eliminate disparities in opportunities, and foster inclusive communities. The Fair Housing Act prohibits discrimination based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex (including gender and sexual orientation), familial status, and disability. 

    AFHM requirements require that owners and developers of HUD-subsidized housing have marketing programs in place to reach groups that are protected from discrimination by the Fair Housing Act and are not as likely to apply for such housing. Housing providers must then select methods of outreach and advertising, that are designed to reach those communities. Too often, the populations that are the least likely to apply are those that are underrepresented in the area where the property is located, especially affordable properties in high opportunity areas — areas that offer residents enhanced access to economic mobility and improved living conditions. The AFHM regulations do not dictate which tenants an owner must select for a unit, and nothing prohibits landlords from advertising through other media that reach different populations as well.

    In the letter, the attorneys general argue that the proposed repeal of these longstanding regulations is in direct contradiction with the mandate of the Fair Housing Act — to affirmatively further fair housing through ensuring non-discriminatory marketing practices — especially so given the lack of: 

    • a replacement rule; 
    • an explanation of how HUD will affirmatively ensure that covered program participants are not engaging in discriminatory and unlawful housing marketing practices in violation of federal law; and 
    • legally sufficient or evidence-based justifications for this total reversal of over 50 years of federal housing policy and law.

    The attorneys general hold a vested interest in ensuring equal access to housing and eradicating discrimination in communities nationwide. The national housing crisis is driven by a shortage of housing supply and skyrocketing unaffordability that disproportionately affects communities of color. The highest disparities are experienced by Black households — a byproduct of systemic racism and policies that targeted Black people and neighborhoods home to primarily Black people. Data on fair housing complaints confirm that proactive fair housing measures, including in advertising, are as vital as ever. In 2023, record high levels of fair housing complaints were submitted to HUD, the U.S. Department of Justice, and other fair housing organizations; the annual number of complaints has consistently risen. 

    In sending today’s letter Attorney General Bonta and the attorneys general from Maryland and New York lead the attorneys general of Arizona, Colorado, Connecticut, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, North Carolina, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington, and the District of Columbia.   

    A copy of the letter can be found here. 

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI Africa: Nigerian business leverage African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) to grow the country’s intra-African trade opportunities

    Source: APO – Report:

    Nigeria is working towards fast-tracking implementation of the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) to unlock opportunities for businesses in the country across the continent.

    Nigeria’s Minister of the Federal Ministry of Industry, Trade and Investment, Hon. Jumoke Oduwole noted that intra-African trade has been improving.

    “Intra African trade exports grew by over 13% from last year supported by new trade corridors and the initial success of AfCFTA’s guideline initiatives. Nigerian businesses are already key participants, exporting, ceramics, garments, pharmaceuticals and agro products across the continent,” Hon. Jumoke said in a keynote address to government officials, the Nigerian trade community, business leaders and investors attending the Nigeria IATF2025 Business Roadshow.

    “As we talk about expanding and unlocking new trade markets, we must recognize the creative economy as a serious trade frontier. Platforms such as Creative Africa Nexus (CANEX) led by Afreximbank are proving that African culture is bankable not just beautiful.” She added.

    The event that was attended by over 700 people focused on promoting intra-African trade under the theme: ‘Harnessing Regional and Continental Value Chains: Accelerating Africa’s Industrialisation and Global Competitiveness through AfCFTA.’

    The Nigeria IATF2025 roadshow is one of the five in a series of five high-level events in key cities including Nairobi, Accra, Johannesburg, and Algiers ahead of the fourth edition of the biennial Intra-African Trade Fair (IATF) that will be held in Algiers, Algeria from 4 – 10 September 2025 under the theme ‘Gateway to New Opportunities’. IATF is Africa’s premier trade and investment event that serves as a crucial platform for fostering economic growth, collaboration, and innovation across the continent.

    Addressing the forum, Executive Director/CEO of the Nigerian Export Promotion Council (NEPC), Nonye Ayeni noted that IATF offers an unparalleled platform for the exchange of trade and investment information and is Africa’s marketplace of ideas, opportunities, and partnerships.

    “With frameworks like AFCFTA and platforms like IATF we now have the tools to bridge the trade gap, boost Intra African trade and tremendously grow our economies in a sustainable and inclusive way. We need to build structured, sustainable and competitive value chains that can power inclusive growth both here in Nigeria and across the continent in Africa. We know that AfCFTA promises to be the largest single market in the world, connecting 1.3 billion people across 54 countries in Africa,” Ms Ayeni said.

    Building on this, Executive Vice President, Intra-African Trade and Export Development at Afreximbank, Mrs. Kanayo Awani highlighted the tangible results borne out of the trade fair across the continent and in Nigeria specifically.

    “In just three editions, IATF has achieved what once felt aspirational: over $100 billion in trade and investment deals, more than 70,000 participants, and 4,500+ exhibitors from across 130 countries. This is not just a conference, it is Africa’s trade engine, designed to connect our producers, unlock demand, and operationalise the promise of the AfCFTA. And in every edition—whether in Cairo, Durban, or beyond, Nigeria has not just participated. Nigeria has led. At IATF2023 alone, Nigerian enterprises generated over $11 billion in signed deals, the highest of any country,” Mrs Awani added.

    IATF is a platform for boosting trade and investment in Africa. The last edition held in Cairo attracted nearly 2,000 exhibitors from 65 countries and generated US$43.7 billion in trade and investment deals.

    Some of the activities lined up for the week-long IATF2025 include a trade exhibition by countries and businesses; the CANEX programme with a dedicated exhibition and summit on fashion, music, film, arts and craft, sports, literature, gastronomy and culinary arts; a four-day Trade and Investment Forum featuring leading African and international speakers; and the Africa Automotive Show for auto manufacturers, assemblers, original equipment manufacturers and component suppliers.

    Special Days will also be held at IATF2025, dedicated for countries as well as public and private entities to showcase trade and investment opportunities, and tourism and cultural attractions, as well as Global Africa Day to highlight commercial and cultural ties between Africa and its diaspora, featuring a Diaspora Summit, market and exhibition, cultural and gastronomic showcase.

    Also planned is a business-to-business (B2B) and business-to-government (B2G) platform for matchmaking and business exchanges; the AU Youth Start-Up programme showcasing innovative ideas and prototypes; the Africa Research and Innovation Hub @ IATF targeting university students, academia and national researchers to exhibit their innovations and research projects; the Trade Exhibition offering large corporations and SME’s the opportunities to showcase their goods and services, the Trade and Investment Forum, a four day conference featuring sessions and training discussing trade opportunities and barriers.

    Others include the Creative Africa Nexus (CANEX), a showcase of African and Diaspora creative talent, the Special Days segment offering countries, private and public sectors the opportunity to sponsor their special event on specific days, the Africa Automotive show, a platform for auto manufacturers to exhibit their products and interact with potential buyers, IATF Virtual, an interactive online platform that will continue after the live event is over, Diaspora Day highlighting the commercial and cultural ties between Africa and its diaspora and the African Sub-Sovereign Governments Network (AfSNET) to promote trade, investment, educational and cultural exchanges at the local level. The IATF Virtual platform is already live, connecting exhibitors and visitors throughout the year.

    To participate in IATF2025 please visit www.IntrAfricanTradeFair.com.

    – on behalf of Afreximbank.

    Media contact:
    media@intrafricatradefair.com 
    press@afreximbank.com

    About the Intra-African Trade Fair:

    Organised by African Export-Import Bank (Afreximbank), in collaboration with the African Union Commission (AUC) and the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) Secretariat, the Intra-African Trade Fair (IATF) is intended to provide a unique platform for facilitating trade and investment information exchange in support of increased intra-African trade and investment, especially in the context of implementing the African Continental Free Trade Agreement (AfCFTA). IATF brings together continental and global players to showcase and exhibit their goods and services and to explore business and investment opportunities in the continent. It also provides a platform to share trade, investment and market information with stakeholders and allows participants to discuss and identify solutions to the challenges confronting intra-African trade and investment. In addition to African participants, the Trade Fair is also open to businesses and investors from non-African countries interested in doing business in Africa and in supporting the continent’s transformation through industrialisation and export development.

    Media files

    .

    MIL OSI Africa –

  • MIL-OSI Canada: Backgrounder: Federal and territorial governments invest in expansion to transit fleet in Whitehorse

    Source: Government of Canada News

    Backgrounder

    The federal government is investing $5,894,443 through the Public Transit Infrastructure Stream of the Investing in Canada Infrastructure Program to support three public transit projects in Whitehorse, Yukon.

    Project Information:

    Location

    Project Name

    Project Details

    Federal Funding

    Territorial Funding

    Municipality of Whitehorse

    Whitehorse Transit: Additional Transit Buses 2024

    This 2024 project involves the addition of two 40-foot fully accessible buses to the City’s existing fleet to complement the reserve fleet and meet the needs of a growing city with expanding transit service. The reserve fleet serves multiple functions, such as vehicle substitution during regular maintenance, emergency situations such as accidents or unexpected breakdowns, driver training and the flexibility to modify transit service provided on relatively short notice. Additional buses will maintain the capacity of the public transit infrastructure by ensuring service levels are maintained, providing flexibility to modify and modernize routes and ensuring routine and unexpected maintenance can be accommodated to maximize the service life of the fleet. The City of Whitehorse’s Transit Services fleet currently consists of 15 low-floor, fully accessible 40-foot buses. The age of the fleet ranges from 2008 to the most recent buses acquired in 2023.

    $1,125,000

    $375,000

    Municipality of Whitehorse

    Whitehorse Transit: Additional Transit Buses 2025

    This 2025 project supplements the 2024 project and involves the addition of three 40-foot fully accessible buses to the City of Whitehorse’s existing fleet to complement the reserve fleet.

    $1,687,000

    $563,000

    Municipality of Whitehorse

    Whitehorse Transit: Additional Transit Buses 2026 and 2027

    The City of Whitehorse will acquire five 40-foot, fully accessible buses in 2026 and 2027. Three new buses will be added in 2026 to improve service during peak transit hours, enabling the system to better meet high demand by increasing frequency and reliability. Route coverage will also be expanded to ensure consistent and timely service during busy transit periods. The two buses planned for 2026 or 2027 will replace existing units that are nearing end of life, which will ensure fleet reliability and continued service quality as the City and ridership grows.

    $3,082,443

    $1,027,481

    MIL OSI Canada News –

  • MIL-OSI Canada: Federal and territorial governments invest in expansion to transit fleet in Whitehorse

    Source: Government of Canada News

    Whitehorse, Yukon, July 3, 2025 — The City of Whitehorse will improve their transit system thanks to a combined investment of over $7.8 million from the federal and territorial governments.

    Ten 40-foot fully accessible buses will be added to the existing fleet in Whitehorse between 2026 and 2028. The City’s current fleet consists of 15 low-floor accessible buses that were purchased between 2008 and 2023. New buses will ensure efficiency and maintain service levels while helping to meet the needs of the growing city for residents and visitors. The additional buses will allow opportunities to improve routes, ensure unexpected maintenance can be accommodated, and will maximize the service life of the fleet for the city. 

    MIL OSI Canada News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Justice Department Files Motion to Prevent Construction Delays for “Alligator Alcatraz” Immigration Detention Center in Florida

    Source: US State of North Dakota

    The Justice Department’s Environment and Natural Resources Division (ENRD) today filed in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida to prevent unnecessary construction delays for Florida’s temporary immigration detention center known as “Alligator Alcatraz” in the Everglades.

    “The Department of Justice has defended President Trump’s immigration agenda in court since day one and we are proud to protect ‘Alligator Alcatraz’ from baseless, politically motivated legal schemes,” said Attorney General Pamela Bondi.

    “Delaying the construction of Florida’s temporary detention center, as plaintiffs request, would imperil critical immigration enforcement efforts and endanger detainees in overcrowded detention facilities,” said Acting Assistant Attorney General Adam Gustafson of ENRD. “We are proud to defend against these unfounded claims and to help the administration fulfill its fundamental obligation to prioritize the safety and security of Americans.” 

    On June 27, two political advocacy organizations — Friends of the Everglades Inc. and Center for Biological Diversity — filed a lawsuit to halt the construction and operation of the detention center, alleging failure to analyze the environmental effects of the project as required under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The plaintiffs asked for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction.  

    In today’s filing, the Justice Department vigorously opposed the request for emergency and injunctive relief. Among other things, the filing highlights that there is no federal final agency action, that the Administrative Procedure Act does not apply to state agency decisions, that any claims related to potential federal funding are unripe, and that the plaintiffs failed to show irreparable harm.  

    Attorneys in ENRD’s Natural Resources Section are handling the case. 

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Justice Department Files Motion to Prevent Construction Delays for “Alligator Alcatraz” Immigration Detention Center in Florida

    Source: US State of North Dakota

    The Justice Department’s Environment and Natural Resources Division (ENRD) today filed in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida to prevent unnecessary construction delays for Florida’s temporary immigration detention center known as “Alligator Alcatraz” in the Everglades.

    “The Department of Justice has defended President Trump’s immigration agenda in court since day one and we are proud to protect ‘Alligator Alcatraz’ from baseless, politically motivated legal schemes,” said Attorney General Pamela Bondi.

    “Delaying the construction of Florida’s temporary detention center, as plaintiffs request, would imperil critical immigration enforcement efforts and endanger detainees in overcrowded detention facilities,” said Acting Assistant Attorney General Adam Gustafson of ENRD. “We are proud to defend against these unfounded claims and to help the administration fulfill its fundamental obligation to prioritize the safety and security of Americans.” 

    On June 27, two political advocacy organizations — Friends of the Everglades Inc. and Center for Biological Diversity — filed a lawsuit to halt the construction and operation of the detention center, alleging failure to analyze the environmental effects of the project as required under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The plaintiffs asked for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction.  

    In today’s filing, the Justice Department vigorously opposed the request for emergency and injunctive relief. Among other things, the filing highlights that there is no federal final agency action, that the Administrative Procedure Act does not apply to state agency decisions, that any claims related to potential federal funding are unripe, and that the plaintiffs failed to show irreparable harm.  

    Attorneys in ENRD’s Natural Resources Section are handling the case. 

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI: Safe Money Report Releases 2025 Strategic Update on Wealth Protection Amid the Age of Chaos

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Miami, July 03, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) —

    SECTION 1 – Introduction

    The global investment landscape is undergoing a historic shift, creating an urgent need for action. Amid inflationary pressures, geopolitical disruption, and conflicting signals from financial markets, individual investors are facing mounting uncertainty. In what financial analyst Martin Weiss terms the “Age of Chaos,” the traditional rules of investing are being challenged by rapid technological change, shifting fiscal policies, and evolving global alliances.

    Recent market anomalies underscore this volatility. Breakout earnings reports from leading tech firms have been met with unexpected stock declines. Gold prices are climbing even as investor sentiment wavers. Meanwhile, the U.S. dollar, which has been an extended global stabilizer, is facing pressure from currency realignment and prolonged fiscal imbalances. These conditions have raised urgent questions about how to preserve capital in a climate where risk is no longer easily defined.

    Online search behavior reflects the public’s growing concern. Queries related to “wealth protection,” “safe investments 2025,” and “inflation hedge strategies” have surged in recent months. Investors are actively seeking data-backed, non-promotional insights that go beyond market speculation. They are asking not just whether to buy or sell, but how to realign long-term strategies to weather sustained volatility.

    Against this backdrop, Safe Money Report has issued a 2025 update anchored in historical precedent, analytics-driven methodologies, and principles of liquidity and independence. The practicality of this update, designed to provide a reassuring reference point for investors seeking clarity in an era marked by unpredictability, instills confidence in their investment decisions.

    Further details are available through Weiss Ratings’ official publications.

    SECTION 2 – Company/Product Announcement

    In response to a wave of economic disruption and growing investor uncertainty, Safe Money Report has released a 2025 update outlining its strategic six-step framework for navigating what it terms the “Age of Chaos.” The announcement, developed by financial analyst Martin Weiss and backed by over five decades of market observation, builds on Weiss Ratings’ independent, data-driven model for assessing asset stability across multiple sectors, ensuring the objectivity and security of the analysis.

    The six-part strategy addresses key areas of concern voiced in public discourse and reflected in market behavior, including asset liquidity, portfolio exposure, inflation hedging, digital currency volatility, and the future role of alternative asset classes, such as farmland. Each step is designed to provide a comprehensive approach to wealth protection, emphasizing flexible, research-backed principles that investors can consider when evaluating current holdings or future positions.

    Central to the 2025 release is Weiss Ratings’ algorithmic model — a platform that draws on over 100 years of financial data, tens of thousands of data points per security, and a proprietary ratings system designed to function without external influence. This model, which has historically identified key turning points such as the 2008 financial crisis and the dot-com collapse, provides a non-emotional analytical foundation during periods of extreme volatility, making it a reliable tool for investors.

    According to the update, the new economic environment demands adaptability. The Weiss framework encourages investors to consider criteria such as daily trading volume, institutional-grade liquidity thresholds, and historical resilience under inflationary conditions. For instance, by analyzing the daily trading volume of a stock, investors can gauge its market liquidity and potential for quick sale. The six-step approach, informed by both traditional economic indicators and emerging signals from non-traditional sectors, is intended to serve as an informational resource for those seeking to safeguard long-term wealth in an unstable market.

    While the Safe Money Report refrains from offering personalized investment advice, its publication highlights a growing demand for independent analysis untethered from mainstream market narratives. In 2025, this release marks a structured effort to equip investors with data-driven perspectives, historical context, and systematized risk awareness, tailored to an era where market conditions remain in constant flux.

    SECTION 3 – Trend Analysis / Consumer Interest Overview

    Across public forums, financial news outlets, and digital search trends, one theme dominates the investor landscape in 2025: uncertainty. Search engine data indicates a growing interest in phrases such as “how to protect retirement from inflation,” “market chaos strategy,” and “safe asset classes.” Investors are actively seeking guidance that does not rely on speculative commentary or unverified opinions, but rather on grounded historical analysis and algorithmic insights.

    The term “Age of Chaos,” now gaining visibility among financial audiences, encapsulates this emerging outlook. Rather than focusing solely on individual asset classes or geopolitical events, it suggests a broader, systemic volatility — one marked by unpredictable policy shifts, economic fragmentation, and compressed investment cycles. In this context, traditional long-term assumptions about market recovery and asset correlation are increasingly being questioned.

    The Safe Money Report identifies this shift not as a short-term anomaly but as a structural transformation in how risk is perceived. Evidence from past crises, including the 2008 banking collapse and the 2000–2003 tech correction, supports the premise that periods of instability are often accompanied by brief rallies, followed by deeper contractions. Today’s landscape — with its rising gold prices, fluctuating technology stock valuations, and increasing attention to digital assets — is exhibiting similar characteristics.

    In response, public commentary has begun to focus more on portfolio positioning strategies that account for non-linear risks. Liquidity has become a key topic of discussion. Investors are increasingly skeptical of hard-to-exit assets or overly complex instruments, and instead are seeking investments that are simple to understand, transparent in structure, and easily adjusted.

    The current environment has also sparked a broader reevaluation of what constitutes “safe” investment behavior. As interest in central bank policy, dollar stability, and alternative currencies grows, so too does demand for analytical tools that can decode macroeconomic volatility without bias. This is where platforms like Weiss Ratings, which avoid promotional partnerships or external incentives, are seeing increased engagement. Rather than promise outcomes, these tools aim to provide frameworks for understanding the evolving nature of economic risk and market fragility.

    The full research update is accessible via Weiss Ratings’ publicly released materials.

    SECTION 4 – Spotlight on Strategic Components: Six Data-Driven Focus Areas

    The Safe Money Report 2025 framework is built on six primary focus areas that reflect long-standing economic signals and current shifts in asset behavior. Each has been selected not as a prediction vehicle, but as a lens through which to assess investment resilience amid ongoing volatility.

    1. Liquidity and Flexibility Screening

    At the foundation of the report’s framework is the principle of asset liquidity. Investments that can be easily entered or exited are central to maintaining financial agility in uncertain markets. Metrics such as average daily trading volume and minimum market capitalization thresholds are used as filters — not guarantees — to evaluate accessibility under rapidly changing conditions.

    2. Risk-Based Stock Ratings

    The Weiss Ratings model evaluates thousands of publicly traded companies against a range of stability and performance indicators. Stocks with consistently low ratings have been highlighted in recent communications as potentially vulnerable during periods of macroeconomic strain. These assessments are driven entirely by data inputs and proprietary scoring algorithms, without promotional intent.

    3. Historical Inflation Hedges: Gold

    Gold’s historical role as a hedge against currency devaluation and inflation has positioned it as a recurring area of interest in times of fiscal pressure. The report outlines this trend in neutral terms, citing past monetary shifts, such as the end of the gold standard in 1971, and their correlation with gold’s upward movement, without speculating on future pricing or returns.

    4. Market Signal Volatility and Emerging Asset Modeling

    As part of its broader modeling approach, Weiss Ratings includes observational data sets related to non-traditional asset classes, particularly those exhibiting high volatility cycles and inconsistent correlation with legacy financial indices. These asset categories, while not universally defined or adopted across institutions, have gained visibility in academic and research environments due to their periodic divergence from traditional investment patterns.

    The Safe Money Report includes this segment solely to acknowledge the role of high-variance instruments within volatility forecasting models. No investment recommendations or endorsements are provided. All data references are based on cyclical trends and historical behavior patterns without forward-looking claims or speculative commentary.

    5. Farmland and Alternative Real Estate

    Global agricultural land, particularly regions with low natural disaster risk and high food production capacity, is discussed as a long-term value store. Rather than promoting real estate purchases, the update highlights macroeconomic data suggesting increasing institutional interest in land-based assets during trade disruptions or currency weakness.

    6. Data-Guided Diversification Principles

    The sixth focus area emphasizes neutrality and independence in asset selection. Rather than relying on prevailing narratives or media sentiment, the report advocates for a systematic approach to evaluating diversification strategies through unbiased, long-term data modeling.

    These six pillars are not presented as guarantees or recommendations, but rather as analytical categories shaped by historical precedent and current volatility. Their inclusion reflects Safe Money Report’s effort to provide investors with structured context in the absence of certainty.

    SECTION 5 – Public Interest and Market Tone

    Recent shifts in online investor communities indicate a growing interest in frameworks that prioritize objectivity over speculation. While social media and financial forums remain saturated with short-term forecasts and high-frequency commentary, a parallel conversation has emerged: one centered on navigating prolonged uncertainty with data-first tools and historically grounded insights.

    Within this context, Safe Money Report has seen renewed interest from readers seeking clarity in what many now label an “unreadable” or “irrational” market. The term “Age of Chaos” itself has become a focal point in these discussions — a metaphor not only for economic conditions, but also for the perceived breakdown of traditional investing norms. Observers note that price action often diverges from fundamentals, with events such as strong earnings reports followed by market declines, or bullish policy moves met with retreat in equity indices. This disconnect has led many to seek out alternative interpretive models that are rooted in quantitative research rather than commentary.

    Feedback trends suggest that investors are especially drawn to the idea of rules-based frameworks, not as a way to predict market movements, but as a method for insulating decision-making from emotional swings. Terms like “bias-free ratings,” “independent signals,” and “data over headlines” are increasingly cited in discussions about financial preparedness. This echoes a wider public concern: how to plan responsibly when both optimism and pessimism seem unreliable as guiding principles.

    Additionally, the public narrative is shifting from short-term return maximization to long-term asset preservation. As attention to inflation rises and skepticism grows about centralized financial messaging, more investors are expressing interest in strategies that emphasize structural safety: liquid equities, tangible assets, and diversified exposure to sectors less correlated with traditional stock indices.

    While the Safe Money Report does not offer personalized advice, its model portfolio and analytical reports are gaining traction among those who view historical modeling and independent oversight as preferable alternatives to market-timed trading or sentiment-driven speculation. The ongoing reception appears to reflect a growing consensus that durable frameworks — even those without guarantees — may be the most practical tools available in navigating a market that no longer adheres to familiar rules.

    A comprehensive overview of the six-part methodology is featured in Weiss Ratings’ latest release.

    SECTION 6 – Availability and Transparency Statement

    The full 2025 strategic update from Safe Money Report, including its six-part framework for navigating market volatility, is now available to the public through Weiss Ratings. The content is designed for informational purposes only and is based entirely on independently developed research methodologies. It does not represent personalized investment advice, financial guarantees, or any form of promotional solicitation.

    Weiss Ratings remains privately held and operates without advertising sponsorships, ensuring that no outside party influences the analysis or ratings it provides. All insights contained within the Safe Money Report are driven by proprietary algorithms and long-range historical data, not market trends or promotional partnerships.

    Readers seeking further context can consult Weiss Ratings’ published materials, which detail the firm’s algorithmic modeling practices, asset evaluation methodologies, and archived forecasting studies. These resources are designed to support informed investor decision-making in environments where traditional predictive models may no longer be applicable.

    The current update reflects an ongoing commitment to data transparency, neutral positioning, and accessibility in financial analysis. It is one of several recurring informational releases Weiss Ratings makes available to the investing public.

    SECTION 7 – Final Observations & Industry Context

    The release of the Safe Money Report 2025 update arrives during a period when investor expectations are being reshaped by prolonged volatility and skepticism toward traditional market narratives. From institutional investors to retail market participants, the demand for data-backed, transparent, and independent frameworks continues to accelerate. The appetite for actionable intelligence has not disappeared, but the threshold for credibility has evolved.

    A defining trend across the financial industry is the growing rejection of opaque product offerings and media-driven investment cycles. In their place, clean-label strategies — rooted in historical precedent, accessible metrics, and conflict-free evaluation — have gained ground. The Safe Money Report, developed under the Weiss Ratings system, reflects this trend by prioritizing algorithmic transparency and long-term analysis over opinion-based guidance.

    In the broader ecosystem of financial research, independent ratings firms have become more relevant to both institutional and private investors seeking to avoid exposure to promotional conflicts of interest. The events of the past two decades — including multiple financial crises, asset bubbles, and regulatory failures — have underscored the importance of analytical models that operate outside the sphere of influence held by banks, brokers, and fund managers.

    As 2025 progresses, the challenges facing investors appear less likely to be resolved by short-term optimism and more likely to demand frameworks grounded in realism and historical literacy. The Safe Money Report release, while not prescriptive, contributes to this shift by presenting a systematic view of market behavior and economic fragility — one shaped by data, tested by precedent, and delivered with complete transparency.

    SECTION 8 – Public Commentary Theme Summary

    As conversations surrounding the “Age of Chaos” accelerate across financial forums, publications, and informal investor networks, several recurring themes have emerged — many reflecting heightened uncertainty. In contrast, others suggest cautious optimism rooted in historical precedent.

    Some observers have noted a growing disconnect between market fundamentals and short-term price behavior. This has led to broader discussions around the value of tools that prioritize data objectivity over media-driven sentiment. In particular, public interest is shifting toward ratings frameworks and risk models that operate without promotional sponsorship or institutional bias.

    Others have expressed concern about the reliability of traditional guidance in the current environment. With central banks pursuing varied monetary responses, geopolitical tensions disrupting supply chains, and asset correlations shifting unpredictably, many investors are raising questions about the long-term viability of conventional portfolio allocations.

    At the same time, a recurring discussion point involves the search for inflation hedges and value preservation strategies outside of traditional equities. Farmland, digital assets, and precious metals are increasingly appearing in public discourse, not as speculative investments, but as part of broader diversification conversations.

    Still, skepticism remains. Some have raised valid concerns about the feasibility of applying historical frameworks to modern market structures, which are shaped by artificial intelligence, algorithmic trading, and global interdependence. While historical case studies can offer context, not all investors agree on their applicability in an age of technological acceleration.

    A consensus has emerged, recognizing uncertainty as the default condition, rather than the exception. As a result, discussions continue to explore the potential of frameworks — such as those presented in the Safe Money Report — to help make sense of a market where volatility is not temporary, but structural.

    SECTION 9 – About the Company

    Founded in 1971 by Martin D. Weiss, Weiss Ratings is an independent financial research and ratings organization that delivers data-driven analysis of stocks, mutual funds, ETFs, banks, and insurance companies. The firm maintains a conflict-free model, accepting no advertising or compensation from the companies it evaluates. Its proprietary ratings system is based on more than a century of market history and thousands of performance indicators.

    Weiss Ratings aims to provide investors with transparent, algorithm-based tools that support informed financial decisions in uncertain market environments. Its methodologies are designed to operate independently of institutional influence, emphasizing data integrity and long-term historical context.

    Weiss Ratings does not provide treatment, personalized investment advice, or diagnostic financial services. All published material is for informational purposes only and intended for a general audience.

    Contact:

    The MIL Network –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Welch Meets with Vermonters in Killington, Ludlow, and Weston to Discuss His New Bill to Reform FEMA

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator Peter Welch (D-Vermont)
    KILLINGTON, VT — This week in Killington, Ludlow, and Weston, U.S. Senator Peter Welch (D-Vt.) unveiled his new bill, the Disaster Assistance Improvement and Decentralization (AID) Act, and met with flood-impacted Vermonters and community members to discuss the importance of reforming FEMA’s long-term recovery process, supporting hazard mitigation, and protecting recovery funding. 
    “The Disaster AID Act was inspired by towns and cities in Vermont that are still recovering from the 2023 and 2024 floods. These folks know firsthand the strengths and weaknesses of FEMA. I’m determined to help improve the long-term recovery process—both for Vermonters, and for communities across America hurt by climate disasters,” said Senator Peter Welch. “I am always thankful to hear how Washington can work better for Vermont, and I use these stories and experiences to shape the legislation I introduce.”  
    The Disaster AID Act will cut red tape and empower state and local governments, make the delivery of disaster aid more efficient and effective, provide assistance to small towns and communities impacted by natural disasters, and block the White House from withholding funding for disaster recovery. Senator Welch will officially introduce the Disaster AID Act next week, coinciding with the anniversary of the floods. 
    Killington: In Killington, Senator Welch joined town officials to tour view East Mountain Road, which was heavily damaged in July 2023 and has since been rebuilt. The Senator also held a Listening Session with flood-impacted Vermonters and community leaders to discuss the state’s long-term recovery from the July 2023 and July 2024 floods, and ways the Disaster AID Act will small and rural communities across the state. 
    Photo Caption: Abbie Sherman, Public Works Director for Killington (middle) and Will Austin, Assistant Town Planner for Killington (right) show Senator Peter Welch (left) a map with flood damage in Killington. 
    Photo Caption: Senator Peter Welch views a photo of the flood damage on East Mountain Road. Left to right: Senator Peter Welch; Rebecca Ellis, State Director for Senator Peter Welch; Will Austin, Assistant Town Planner for Killington; Abbie Sherman, Public Works Director for Killington. 
    Photo Caption: Senator Peter Welch discusses flood recovery and other issues with Vermonters at the Killington Welcome Center.   
    Photo Caption: Senator Peter Welch discusses flood recovery with  Joseph Gaudiana, Brendan McNamara, and Justin Hyjek at Ludlow’s wastewater treatment facility, which is located near the Black River. 
    Ludlow: Senator Welch joined Ludlow town officials to view flooding damage to the village wastewater treatment facility, located on the Black River, and discuss progress on relocating the facility out of the flood plain. The Senator highlighted how the Disaster AID Act would help to simplify and expedite the relocation of critical infrastructure out of flood-prone areas. 
    Photo Caption: Senator Peter Welch discusses flood recovery and other issues with Vermonters in Weston. 
    Weston: In Weston, Senator Welch joined community leaders to view and discuss the Weston Mill Dam removal project, which will substantially lower the flood elevation level in the village. Senator Welch nominated for the project for Congressionally Directed Spending (CDS). Senator Welch also met with town officials to discuss the importance and need for municipal technical assistance in flood recovery and mitigation planning. He was joined by members of the Weston Playhouse on the Green, which still requires major repairs following the floods. 
    Senator Welch has been outspoken in opposing any attempt by the Trump Administration to dismantle FEMA. Earlier this year, Senator Welch published a guest essay in The New York Times entitled: “Don’t Kill FEMA. Fix It.” In his piece, Senator Welch outlined why President Trump’s actions to undermine and potentially dissolve FEMA are misguided—but also committed to working with the President on good faith efforts to reform the agency’s long-term recovery process.   
    In December 2024, Senator Welch helped shape and pass a comprehensive disaster aid package, which delivered more than $100.4 billion of relief for states like Vermont recovering from climate disasters. The disaster aid package contained many of Senator Welch’s top priorities for the State: dedicated help for Vermont’s flood-impacted farmers, flexible spending through the Community Development Block Grant-Disaster Relief fund, money for FEMA’s Disaster Relief Fund, and support for businesses, among many other important provisions.  

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • Trump, Putin reiterate positions on Ukraine war in phone call, Kremlin aide says

    Source: Government of India

    Source: Government of India (4)

    U.S. President Donald Trump pushed for a quick halt to the Ukraine war in a Thursday phone call with Vladimir Putin, while a Kremlin aide said the Russian president reiterated that Moscow would keep pushing to solve the conflict’s “root causes.”

    The two leaders did not discuss a recent pause in some U.S. weapons shipments to Kyiv during the nearly hour-long call, according to a readout provided by Putin aide Yuri Ushakov.

    Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy, meanwhile, told reporters in Denmark that he hopes to speak to Trump as soon as Friday about the ongoing pause in some weapons shipments, which was first disclosed earlier this week.

    Trump did not immediately comment on the conversation with Putin, but he said on social media beforehand that he would speak to the Russian leader.

    “Root causes” has become Russian shorthand for issue of NATO enlargement and Western support for Ukraine, including the rejection of any notion of Ukraine joining the NATO alliance. Russian leaders are also angling to establish greater control over political decisions made in Kyiv and other eastern European capitals, NATO leaders have said.

    The diplomatic back-and-forth comes as the U.S. has paused shipments of certain critical weapons to Ukraine due to low stockpiles, sources earlier told Reuters.

    That decision led to Ukraine calling in the acting U.S. envoy to Kyiv on Wednesday to underline the importance of military aid from Washington, and caution that the move would weaken Ukraine’s ability to defend against intensifying Russian airstrikes and battlefield advances.

    The Pentagon’s move led in part to a cut in deliveries of Patriot air defence missiles that Ukraine relies on to destroy fast-moving ballistic missiles, Reuters reported on Wednesday.

    Ushakov, the Kremlin aide, said the issue of weapons deliveries to Ukraine did not come up during the Trump-Putin phone call.

    Ushakov added that while Russia was open to continuing to speak with the U.S., any peace negotiations needed to occur between Moscow and Kyiv.

    That comment comes amid some indications that Moscow is trying to avoid a trilateral format for any peace negotiations. The Russians asked American diplomats to leave the room during such a meeting in Istanbul in early June, Ukrainian officials have said.

    Trump and Putin did not talk about a face-to-face meeting, Ushakov said.

    -Reuters

  • MIL-OSI Security: Nine Charged with Alleged Scheme to Generate Revenue for North Korean Government and Its Weapons of Mass Destruction Program

    Source: US FBI

    Overseas operatives allegedly used stolen identities of American citizens to obtain remote jobs with U.S. companies, including Fortune 500 companies

    UPDATE: This press release was revised on July 3, 2025 to reflect that a 10th individual was charged in a separate charging document that was unsealed on July 2, 2025. 

    BOSTON – Nine individuals have been indicted in Boston, Mass. including one New Jersey man and eight overseas actors from China and Taiwan in connection with an alleged scheme to generate revenue for the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) weapons of mass destruction (WMD) programs. The alleged scheme involved the dispatchment of skilled information technology (IT) workers who, using stolen identities of U.S. persons, posed as domestic workers to obtain remote IT jobs with U.S. companies, including several Fortune 500 companies and a defense contractor.

    The following defendants have been indicted for their roles in the scheme, which generated at least $5 million in revenue for North Korea:  

    1. U.S. national Zhenxing “Danny” Wang of New Jersey;
    2. Chinese national Jing Bin Huang (靖斌 黄);
    3. Chinese national Baoyu Zhou (周宝玉);
    4. Chinese national Tong Yuze (佟雨泽);
    5. Chinese national Yongzhe Xu (徐勇哲 andيونجزهي أكسو), currently residing in the United Arab Emirates;
    6. Chinese national Ziyou Yuan (زيو), currently residing in the United Arab Emirates;
    7. Chinese national Zhenbang Zhou (周震邦);
    8. Taiwanese national Mengting Liu (劉 孟婷); and
    9. Taiwanese national Enchia Liu (刘恩)

    Zhenxing Wang was arrested earlier today in New Jersey. He will appear in federal court in Boston at a later date. A second U.S. national, Kejia “Tony” Wang of New Jersey, has also been charged in a separate charging document for his role in the scheme and has agreed to plead guilty.

    As alleged in court documents, in response to U.S. and U.N. sanctions, the DPRK government has dispatched thousands of skilled IT workers around the world, who stole identities of U.S. persons and posed as domestic workers to obtain remote IT jobs with U.S. companies and generate revenue for DPRK weapons of mass destruction WMD programs. The DPRK IT workers’ scheme involved the use of pseudonymous email, social media, payment platform and online job site accounts, as well as false websites, proxy computers, and third-party enablers in the United States and abroad. According to the court documents the IT workers employed under this scheme also gained access to sensitive employer data and source code, including International Traffic in Arms Regulations data from a California-based defense contractor that develops artificial intelligence-powered equipment and technologies

    “The threat posed by DPRK operatives is both real and immediate. Thousands of North Korean cyber operatives have been trained and deployed by the regime to blend into the global digital workforce and systematically target U.S. companies,” said United States Attorney Leah B. Foley. “We will continue to work relentlessly to protect U.S. businesses and ensure they are not inadvertently fueling the DPRK’s unlawful and dangerous ambitions.”

    “These schemes target and steal from U.S. companies and are designed to evade sanctions and fund the North Korean regime’s illicit programs, including its weapons programs,” said John A. Eisenberg, Assistant Attorney General for the Department’s National Security Division. “The Justice Department, along with our law enforcement, private sector, and international partners, will persistently pursue and dismantle these cyber-enabled revenue generation networks.”

    “The FBI will continue to work with our partners to expose and mitigate these fraudulent IT schemes and provide unwavering support to victims of North Korean cyber actors. While we have disrupted this group, this is merely the initial phase of the problem. The government of North Korea has trained and deployed thousands of IT workers to carry out similar schemes against U.S. companies daily. Protect your business by thoroughly vetting fully remote workers. The FBI strongly advises organizations to closely monitor their data, strengthen their remote hiring processes, and report any suspicious activity or fraud to the FBI,” said Rafik Mattar, Acting Special Agent in Charge of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Las Vegas Division.

    “These Indictments should act as a deterrent for individuals and foreign entities attempting to illegally export critical defense information,” said John E. Helsing, Acting Special Agent in Charge for the Department of Defense Office of Inspector General, Defense Criminal Investigative Service (DCIS) Western Field Office. “DCIS will continue to work aggressively with our law enforcement partners and the Department of Justice to investigate and prosecute those who threaten our National Security and America’s Warfighters.”

    “This multiagency case demonstrates the power of law enforcement agencies collaborating to dismantle international fraudulent schemes involving technology,” said Shawn Gibson, Special Agent in Charge for Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) in San Diego. “Let this investigation prove that HSI will aggressively identify and bring to justice those who seek to steal intellectual property through illegal access to computer networks in order to financially profit and jeopardize U.S.-based businesses who have fallen victim to these actors.”

    According to the indictment, from approximately 2021 through October 2024, the defendants and other co-conspirators perpetuated a massive fraud scheme resulting in the transmission of false and misleading information to dozens of U.S. companies, financial institutions, and government agencies, including the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), and the Social Security Administration (SSA). Specifically, these defendants and their co-conspirators allegedly compromised the identities of more than 80 U.S. persons; fraudulently obtained remote jobs at more than 100 U.S. companies, including several Fortune 500 companies and a cleared defense contractor; received laptops and other hardware from U.S. companies; accessed, without authorization, the internal systems of these U.S. companies, including sensitive employer data and source code; generated at least $5 million in revenue for the overseas IT workers; and caused U.S. victim companies to incur legal fees, computer network remediation costs, and other damages and losses of at least $3 million.  

    The overseas IT workers were allegedly assisted in this scheme by Kejia Wang, Zhenxing Wang, and at least four other identified U.S. facilitators. These facilitators allegedly received and/or hosted laptops belonging to U.S. victim companies at their residences to deceive the U.S. companies into believing the IT workers were in the United States. It is further alleged that they facilitated remote access to the computers for the overseas IT workers through illicit means, including downloading software to the computers without authorization from the U.S. companies, connecting the U.S. companies’ computers to internet-connected KVM switches, and creating shell companies with corresponding websites and financial accounts, including Hopana Tech LLC, Tony WKJ LLC and Independent Lab LLC to make it appear as though the overseas IT workers were affiliated with legitimate U.S. businesses. These facilitators also allegedly established accounts at U.S. financial institutions and online money transfer services to receive money from victimized U.S. companies, much of which was subsequently transferred to overseas co-conspirators. In exchange for their services, it is alleged that Kejia Wang, Zhenxing Wang, and the other U.S. facilitators collected at least $696,000 in fees.  

    According to court documents, in October 2024, seven locations in New York, New Jersey and California were searched and voluntary interviews at so-called “laptop farms” were conducted (that is, premises used to host U.S company laptop computers used in furtherance of the scheme), resulting in the recovery of more than 70 victim company devices. Additionally, 21 fraudulent web domains used to facilitate North Korean IT work have been seized, and 29 financial accounts, holding tens of thousands of dollars in funds, used to launder revenue for the North Korean regime through remote IT work.

    Also today, the Northern District of Georgia unsealed an indictment charging four North Korean nationals with a scheme to steal virtual currency held by two victim companies valued at over $750,000 and laundering the proceeds overseas. Unlike traditional North Korean IT workers, who usually seek employment with the goal of remitting their salaries back to North Korea, the defendants charged by the Northern District of Georgia allegedly sought employment with virtual currency-related businesses to earn the trust of those businesses and then stole those businesses’ virtual assets.

    Today’s announcement is the culmination of a multi-year investigation by federal law enforcement agencies and is one of several announced today as part of the Justice Department’s initiative, DPRK: Domestic Enabler. Under the initiative, Department prosecutors and agents continue to prioritize high-impact, strategic, and unified enforcement and disruption operations targeting DPRK’s illicit revenue generation efforts through remote IT workers, and the U.S.-based individuals who enable them.

    The U.S. Department of State has offered potential rewards for up to $5 million in support of international efforts to disrupt North Korea’s illicit financial activities, including for certain information related to individuals who are sent outside of North Korea to work to generate money for the North Korean government or who facilitate the activities of such North Korean nationals.

    The charges of conspiracy to commit mail and wire fraud, conspiracy to commit money laundering and conspiracy to violate the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) each provide for a sentence of up to 20 years in prison, three years of supervised release and a fine of $250,000. The charge of conspiracy to cause damage to a protected computer provides for a sentence of up to 15 years in prison, three years of supervised release and a $250,000 fine. The charge of conspiracy to commit identity theft provides for a sentence of up to five years in prison, three years of supervised release and a $250,000 fine. Sentences are imposed by a federal district court judge based upon the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and statutes which govern the determination of a sentence in a criminal case.

    U.S. Attorney Foley; AAG Eisenberg; FBI Las Vegas Acting SAC Mattar; DCIS San Diego Acting SAC Helsing; and HSI San Diego SAC Shawn Gibson made the announcement today. Assistant U.S. Attorney Jason Casey of the National Security Unit is prosecuting the case along with Trial Attorney Gregory J. Nicosia, Jr. of the National Security Division’s National Security Cyber Section. Valuable assistance was provided by FBI New York, Newark and San Diego Field Offices; HSI Newark Field Office; United States Postal Inspection Service’s San Diego Field Office; and the U.S. Attorney’s Offices for the District of New Jersey, the Eastern District of New York and the Southern District of California.

    The details contained in the charging document are allegations. The defendants are presumed to be innocent unless and until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in the court of law.  

    MIL Security OSI –

  • MIL-OSI Security: Justice Department Files Motion to Prevent Construction Delays for “Alligator Alcatraz” Immigration Detention Center in Florida

    Source: United States Attorneys General

    The Justice Department’s Environment and Natural Resources Division (ENRD) today filed in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida to prevent unnecessary construction delays for Florida’s temporary immigration detention center known as “Alligator Alcatraz” in the Everglades.

    “The Department of Justice has defended President Trump’s immigration agenda in court since day one and we are proud to protect ‘Alligator Alcatraz’ from baseless, politically motivated legal schemes,” said Attorney General Pamela Bondi.

    “Delaying the construction of Florida’s temporary detention center, as plaintiffs request, would imperil critical immigration enforcement efforts and endanger detainees in overcrowded detention facilities,” said Acting Assistant Attorney General Adam Gustafson of ENRD. “We are proud to defend against these unfounded claims and to help the administration fulfill its fundamental obligation to prioritize the safety and security of Americans.” 

    On June 27, two political advocacy organizations — Friends of the Everglades Inc. and Center for Biological Diversity — filed a lawsuit to halt the construction and operation of the detention center, alleging failure to analyze the environmental effects of the project as required under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The plaintiffs asked for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction.  

    In today’s filing, the Justice Department vigorously opposed the request for emergency and injunctive relief. Among other things, the filing highlights that there is no federal final agency action, that the Administrative Procedure Act does not apply to state agency decisions, that any claims related to potential federal funding are unripe, and that the plaintiffs failed to show irreparable harm.  

    Attorneys in ENRD’s Natural Resources Section are handling the case. 

    MIL Security OSI –

  • MIL-OSI Canada: Strengthening southern Yukon communities against wildfire exposure

    Source: Government of Canada News (2)

    Whitehorse, Yukon, July 3, 2025 — Communities in southern Yukon will reduce their wildfire risk after a combined investment of more than $17 million from the federal and Yukon governments.

    The funding was announced by Dr. Brendan Hanley, Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Northern and Arctic Affairs and Member of Parliament for Yukon, on behalf of the Honourable Gregor Robertson, Minister of Housing and Infrastructure and Minister responsible for Pacific Economic Development Canada, along with the Honourable Rebecca Alty, Minister of Crown-Indigenous Relations, and the Honourable Nils Clarke, on behalf of Richard Mostyn, Minister of Community Services, for the Government of Yukon.

    Funding for the Government of Yukon’s Wildland Fire Management branch will decrease fire risk in the communities of Whitehorse, Teslin, and Haines Junction—communities which are part of the northern boreal forest region and prone to aggressive wildfire behaviour.

    This region relies on Wildland Fire Management to protect life, critical infrastructure, and property from the impacts of wildfire while facilitating the creation of wildfire-resilient places to live. Funding will support different treatment phases, which include both retreatment and new fuel break construction. With new forest regrowth and new FireSmart standards, previous risk reduction efforts may become less effective over time. Retreatment includes increasing spacing between trees and removing live or dead vegetation that could allow fires to climb the landscape or trees from the forest floors. New treatment will include reducing or managing materials that are flammable or combustible in the wildland-urban interface. These measures follow national standards set out by FireSmart Canada and will increase the wildfire resilience of these three communities.

    MIL OSI Canada News –