Category: Politics

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Text adopted – Welfare of dogs and cats and their traceability – P10_TA(2025)0135 – Thursday, 19 June 2025 – Strasbourg

    Source: European Parliament

    Text proposed by the Commission   Amendment Amendment 1
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 1 (1)  Live animals, including cats and dogs are covered by Annex I to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and form part of the common agricultural policy of the Union. There is a market for these animals in the Union, including substantial cross-border trade. Many Member States are signatories to the European Convention for the Protection of Pet Animals. There is a wide range of evidence of sub-optimal functioning of the internal market for dogs and cats in the Union as well as of illegal trade in these animals within the Union and at import into the Union. Therefore, it is necessary to establish minimum requirements for the welfare of dogs and cats bred and kept in establishments, as well as strengthened requirements regarding the traceability of dogs and cats supplied in the Union. (1)  Live animals, including cats and dogs are covered by Annex I to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, form part of the common agricultural policy of the Union and their welfare should be protected. There is a market for these animals in the Union, including substantial cross-border trade. Many Member States are signatories to the European Convention for the Protection of Pet Animals. There is a wide range of evidence of sub-optimal functioning of the internal market for dogs and cats in the Union as well as of illegal trade in these animals within the Union and at import into the Union. Therefore, considering the findings on animals, which recognise their capacity for emotions, pain and social interactions, it is necessary to establish minimum requirements for the welfare of dogs and cats that are bred and kept in establishments, as well as strengthened requirements regarding the traceability of dogs and cats placed on the Union market. Amendment 2
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 2 (2)  The absence of Union welfare provisions on breeding, keeping and placing on the market of dogs and cats, as well as divergent national rules where they exist, have very often led to those animals being born, bred and sold or adopted at no cost, in circumstances detrimental to their welfare. Competition between commercial breeders of dogs and cats in different Member States is not conducted on a level playing field because animal welfare conditions are one of the main elements of the competitiveness of these operators and they differ considerably between Member States. As a consequence, competition is distorted, especially for high standards breeders and keepers, which are unable to monetise their investments into animal welfare when they trade cross border because they are confronted with operators that profit from sub-standard animal welfare conditions to exert competition and drive prices and standards down. (2)  Dogs and cats, with its own unique biological and behavioural needs, are traded and kept as pets in the Union. The absence of Union welfare provisions on breeding, keeping and placing on the market of dogs and cats, as well as divergent national rules where they exist, have sometimes led to those animals being born, bred and sold or adopted at no cost, in circumstances which could have serious detrimental consequences to their welfare. Competition between commercial breeders of dogs and cats in different Member States is not conducted on a level playing field because animal welfare conditions are one of the main elements of the competitiveness of these operators and they differ considerably between Member States. As a consequence, competition is distorted, especially for high standards breeders and keepers, which are unable to monetise their investments into animal welfare when they trade cross border because they are confronted with operators that profit from sub-standard animal welfare conditions to exert competition and drive prices and standards down. Amendment 3
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 3 (3)  Also, consumers are insufficiently protected as they are often confronted, when acquiring a dog or a cat, with the negative consequences of the poor welfare conditions in which the animals have been bred and kept in the establishments, such as health problems, behavioural problems or genetic defects of the dog or cat purchased or acquired. (3)  Also, consumers are insufficiently protected as they are often confronted, when acquiring a dog or a cat, with the negative consequences of the poor welfare conditions in which the animals have been bred and kept in the establishments, such as health problems, behavioural problems or genetic defects of the dog or cat purchased or acquired. To support informed consumer choices and promote compliance with Union rules, it is essential to inform the public and raise awareness of the difference between responsible and non-compliant or unlawful breeding practices. Amendments 280 and 307
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 3 a (new) (3a)   While several Member States have already introduced positive lists at national level to regulate the private ownership of animals, the absence of a common Union framework of welfare provisions on breeding, keeping and placing on the market of pet animal species other than dogs and cats, as well as divergent national rules, leads to inconsistencies, gaps in enforcement, confusion for consumers and, often, to serious animal welfare consequences for species that are unsuitable to be kept as pets, as well as risks to biodiversity, human health and safety and nature conservation. Amendment 308
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 3 b (new) (3b)   There have been previous calls to establish a science-based Union-wide list of animals that have been assessed as being suitable to be kept as pets, under appropriate welfare conditions, without causing harm to populations in the wild, and therefore to European biodiversity, or to human health and safety. In doing so, it is essential to ensure an assessment of the impact on animals, including their welfare, behaviour, dietary needs, and veterinary care, in order to avoid situations that could cause unnecessary suffering, inappropriate living conditions, or endangerment of species. Amendment 4
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 4 a (new) (4a)  Cooperation between Member States should be enhanced in order to identify illegal breeding establishments, dismantle associated networks, and ensure effective enforcement of applicable rules. Strengthening cross-border collaboration, information exchange and coordinated inspections is essential to address the transnational nature of certain illegal activities and to protect animal welfare and consumer interests across the Union. Amendment 5
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 4 b (new) (4b)  The number of companion animals in the Union has increased significantly over recent years, reflecting the strong attachment of Union citizens to the welfare of dogs and cats. In light of developments in animal welfare science, the Union and its Member States should be encouraged to promote a legal approach that reflects not only the status of animals as property, but also the ethical responsibility of humans towards their welfare and protection. Amendment 6
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 6 (6)  Illegal trade of dogs and cats has developed in part due to lack of traceability of these animals to the original litter. In turn, illegal trade practices are associated with suffering of dogs and cats subject to uncontrolled breeding practices. It is not possible to ensure that operators abide by the same standards of animal welfare, and to ensure uniform conditions of competition in the internal market in relation to the supplying of dogs and cats without reliable means to trace the animals to their origin. It is therefore crucial to ensure the traceability of dogs and cats by a system that identifies and registers dogs and cats before their first supplying in the Union as well as each time there is a change of ownership of the animals. (6)  Illegal trade of dogs and cats has developed in part due to lack of traceability of these animals to the original litter and to consumers’ enthusiasm for these animals, facilitated by the development of online purchasing. In turn, illegal trade practices are associated with suffering of dogs and cats subject to uncontrolled breeding practices. It is not possible to ensure that operators abide by the same standards of animal welfare, and to ensure uniform conditions of competition in the internal market in relation to the placing on the market of dogs and cats without reliable means to trace the animals to their origin. It is therefore crucial to ensure the traceability of dogs and cats by a system that identifies and registers dogs and cats before their first placing on the Union market as well as each time there is a change of ownership of the animals. Amendment 309
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 6 a (new) (6a)   This Regulation introduces mandatory registration, reinforced controls on online sales, and enhanced traceability of dogs and cats, with transition periods of up to 10 years in order to allow the relevant authorities to prepare. It further stresses the importance of Union-wide standards for responsible breeding to prevent detrimental health and welfare impacts on dogs and cats. This Regulation addresses these issues by establishing clear welfare requirements and ensuring that breeding practices uphold the highest standards. Amendment 7
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 7 (7)  Illegal trade in cats and dogs from outside the EU has been increasing. Current EU rules on the movements of dogs and cats into the EU, such as the provisions of Regulation 576/2013 and of the Animal Health Law, do not contain sufficient tools to prevent this illegal trade. This means that additional rules to fight illegal trade in dogs and cats are required. Existing animal health rules require that, both for commercial and non-commercial movement of dogs and cats entering into the Union, the animals must be identified with a microchip. To reinforce these traceability provisions, the owners of dogs and cats entering into the Union should ensure their registration in one of the Member States’ databases at the place of destination. This will provide for greater control on the movements of those animals. (7)  Illegal trade in cats and dogs from outside the EU has been increasing. Current EU rules on the movements of dogs and cats into the EU, such as the provisions of Regulation 576/2013 and of the Animal Health Law, do not contain sufficient tools to prevent this illegal trade. This means that additional rules to fight illegal trade in dogs and cats are required. Existing animal health rules require that, both for commercial and non-commercial movement of dogs and cats entering into the Union, the animals must be identified with a microchip. To reinforce these traceability provisions, the owners or persons responsible for dogs and cats entering into the Union should ensure their registration in one of the Member States’ databases at the place of destination. This will provide for greater control on the movements of those animals. Amendment 8
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 8 (8)  The traceability provisions of this proposal also contribute to the protection of public health via better animal welfare, better animal health, and better controls on the possible transmission of animal diseases (some of which being of zoonotic nature), this following a One Health approach. (8)  The traceability provisions of this proposal also contribute to the protection of public health via better animal welfare, better animal health, and better controls on the possible transmission of animal diseases (some of which being of zoonotic nature, some of which transmitting to wildlife, this following a One Health approach. Amendment 9
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 8 a (new) (8a)  Regulation (EU) 2016/429 of the European Parliament and of the Council regulates transmissible animal diseases for the purpose of avoiding the spread of such diseases in the Union. The health of animals is one of the five domains of animal welfare, and thus addressed in this Regulation. However, this Regulation does not address the diseases listed in Regulation (EU) 2016/429, but rather the state of health of dogs and cats as shaped by non-communicable diseases (for example injuries) or non-listed diseases (for example certain parasites). The rules laid down in this Regulation are therefore complementary to Regulation (EU) 2016/429 and do not duplicate or overlap with the rules laid down in that Regulation. Amendment 10
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 10 (10)  Regulation (EU) 2016/429 requires the identification of dogs and cats with a transponder but only if they are subject to movements between Member States entered into the Union. The identification required by that Regulation is not fully harmonised as it does not include precise standards regarding transponders. Furthermore, that Regulation does not require Member States to keep databases of dogs and cats. Therefore, Member States should be required to establish and maintain databases of dogs and cats supplied in the Union market to ensure the traceability of these animals. It is also necessary to ensure the interoperability of these databases. This will facilitate finding information on dogs and cats across the Union, as well as enable competent authorities to carry out official controls to ensure compliance with animal welfare rules. (10)  Regulation (EU) 2016/429 requires the identification of dogs and cats with a transponder but only if they are subject to movements between Member States entered into the Union. The identification required by that Regulation is not fully harmonised as it does not include precise standards regarding transponders. Furthermore, that Regulation does not require Member States to keep databases of dogs and cats. Therefore, Member States should be required to establish and maintain databases of dogs and cats placed on the Union market to ensure the traceability of these animals. It is also necessary to ensure the interoperability of these databases. This will facilitate finding information on dogs and cats across the Union, as well as enable competent authorities to carry out official controls to ensure compliance with animal welfare rules. Amendment 11
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 11 (11)  The supplying of dogs and cats, whether for profit or at no cost, has an impact on the internal market. Therefore, to prevent fraud, traceability of all animals traded in the Union market should be ensured and the keeping of animals in breeding establishments, pet shops or animal shelters should be subject to detailed rules. (11)  The placing on the market of dogs and cats, whether for profit or at no cost, has an impact on the internal market. Therefore, to prevent fraud, traceability of all animals traded in the Union market should be ensured and the keeping of animals in breeding and selling establishments, pet foster homes or animal shelters should be subject to detailed rules. The military, police or customs that breed or keep dogs for their own services’ use are not in such situation as they do not carry out their breeding or keeping activities for the market. Amendment 12
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 11 a (new) (11a)  The occasional supply of puppies and kittens by their owners who keep dogs or cats for personal or familial enjoyment and companionship and without any commercial intent or purpose, does not have a significant impact on the internal market and it is therefore justified to exclude such supply activities from the scope of application of this Regulation. Amendment 13
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 13 (13)  Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council4 regulates the keeping, breeding and supply of animals kept for scientific purposes including dogs and cats. Dogs and cats intended for scientific purposes should therefore be excluded from the scope of application of this Regulation. (13)  Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council4 regulates the keeping, breeding and supply of animals kept for scientific purposes including dogs and cats. Regulation (EU) 2019/6 of the European Parliament and of the Council regulates clinical trials for veterinary medicinal products involving the use of animals, including dogs and cats. Dogs and cats intended or used for scientific purposes as well as dogs and cats used in clinical trials required for the marketing authorisation of veterinary medicinal products should therefore be excluded from the scope of application of this Regulation. __________________ __________________ 4 Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2010 on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes (OJ L 276, 20.10.2010, p. 33). 4 Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2010 on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes (OJ L 276, 20.10.2010, p. 33). Amendment 14
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 14 (14)  A large number of dogs and cats will be covered by detailed welfare rules for the first time, which will allow them to benefit from better living conditions. However, considering the practical difficulties in certain cases to determine whether dogs and cats are kept as pets or for placing on the market or supply, this Regulation should exempt from certain obligations pet owners who keep a number of dogs and cats and produce a number of litters below a certain threshold. Otherwise, those pet owners would be subject to the relevant requirements of this Regulation, which would not be proportionate. (14)  A large number of dogs and cats will be covered by detailed welfare rules for the first time, which will allow them to benefit from better living conditions. However, considering the practical difficulties in certain cases to determine whether dogs and cats are kept as pets or used for agricultural purposes, such as herding, guarding livestock, farm protection, or for placing on the market or supply, this Regulation should exempt pet owners who keep a number of dogs and cats and produce a number of litters below a certain threshold. Otherwise, those pet owners would be subject to the relevant requirements of this Regulation, which would not be proportionate. Stray cats that roam freely and that keep rodent populations in check, have long been part of this rural balance and serve a functional and symbiotic role on agricultural holdings. Rural and remote areas, where access to veterinary services and compliance infrastructure may be limited, as well as the need to avoid imposing a disproportionate burden on farmers and small-scale breeders, should be duly taken into account. Amendment 15
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 17 (17)  Moreover, in the Union market different types of operators carrying out different types of activities supply dogs and cats. Aside from commercial breeders there are pet shops where dogs and cats, that are typically born and bred in other establishments, are kept for sale. The protection of these animals may be suboptimal, and there are no common welfare standards that need to be observed in these establishments. Given that pet shops are commercial operators that place on the market dogs and cats, it is therefore necessary to apply the requirements of this Regulation to these establishments. (17)  Moreover, in the Union market different types of operators carrying out different types of activities place dogs and cats on the market. Aside from commercial breeders there are selling establishments where dogs and cats, that are typically born and bred in other establishments, are kept for sale. The protection of these animals may be suboptimal, and there are no common welfare standards that need to be observed in these establishments. Given that selling establishments are commercial operators that place on the market dogs and cats, it is therefore necessary to apply the requirements of this Regulation to these establishments. Amendment 16
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 19 (19)  Despite the differences in the activities carried out by commercial breeders and pet shops, on the one hand, and animal shelters, on the other, they all supply dogs and cats in the Union market and there is a certain amount of overlap, especially at the level of the demand. When looking for a dog or cat, consumers make choices between buying an animal from a breeder (either directly or through a pet shop or intermediary), or adopting one from a shelter. The acquisition of dogs or cats directly from pet owners is marginal. One important factor in the choice of a dog or a cat is the possible behavioural or other problems that the animal may exhibit because of having been kept in poor welfare conditions and which may reduce their suitability to be kept as a pet animal, irrespective of whether the animal has been kept in a commercial breeding establishment, in a pet shop or in a shelter. Moreover, given that trade is also conducted by intermediaries and mostly online, consumers may not be aware before they acquire a dog or a cat of whether the animal originates from a shelter, a breeder or a pet shop. There is evidence that the number of animals supplied to the Union market by shelters is significant, in particular for cats. There is also evidence that animals are supplied from shelters in some Member States to prospective pet owners in other Member States, in particular for dogs. In order to ensure the achievement of the objective of this Regulation to ensure the smooth functioning of the internal market in dogs and cats, and the rational development of the sector while ensuring a high level of animal welfare, it is necessary to apply some of the requirements of this Regulation to shelters that keep a certain minimum number of animals, irrespective of whether they sell animals against payment or only supply animals for free or upon reimbursement of reasonable costs. However, for reasons of proportionality and given that the activities of shelters differ from those of other operators and may fulfil a public interest function, only some of the requirements of this Regulation should apply to shelters, concerning, in particular the number and competence of animal caretakers, housing, feeding and watering, behavioural needs and painful practices, and advisory visits by a veterinarian. (19)  Despite the differences in the activities carried out by commercial breeders and selling establishments, on the one hand, and animal shelters, on the other, they all place dogs and cats in the Union market and there is a certain amount of overlap, especially at the level of the demand. When looking for a dog or cat, consumers make choices between buying an animal from a breeder (either directly or through a selling establishment or intermediary), or adopting one from a shelter. The acquisition of dogs or cats directly from pet owners is marginal. One important factor in the choice of a dog or a cat is the possible behavioural or other problems that the animal may exhibit because of having been kept in poor welfare conditions and which may reduce their suitability to be kept as a pet animal, irrespective of whether the animal has been kept in a commercial breeding establishment, in a selling establishment or in a shelter. Moreover, given that trade is also conducted by intermediaries and mostly online, consumers may not be aware before they acquire a dog or a cat of whether the animal originates from a shelter, a breeder or a selling establishment. Providing such information could assist buyers in making informed and responsible choices. There is evidence that the number of animals placed on the Union market by shelters is significant, in particular for cats. There is also evidence that animals are placed on the market from shelters in some Member States to prospective pet owners in other Member States, in particular for dogs. In order to ensure the achievement of the objective of this Regulation to ensure the smooth functioning of the internal market in dogs and cats, and the rational development of the sector while ensuring a high level of animal welfare, it is necessary to apply some of the requirements of this Regulation to shelters that keep a certain minimum number of animals, irrespective of whether they place dogs or cats on the Union market against payment, for free or upon reimbursement of reasonable costs. However, for reasons of proportionality and given that the activities of shelters differ from those of other operators and may fulfil a public interest function, only some of the requirements of this Regulation should apply to shelters, concerning, in particular the number and competence of animal caretakers, housing, feeding and watering, behavioural needs and painful practices, and advisory visits by a veterinarian. Amendment 17
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 19 a (new) (19a)  Member States have observed the increasing use of foster homes by operators responsible for unwanted, abandoned, stray, lost or confiscated dogs or cats . Given that the number of dogs and cats kept in foster homes may impact the market of dogs and cats, foster homes should be covered by this Regulation. In such cases, the operators placing the dogs or cats in foster homes should be responsible for ensuring that the requirements of this Regulation are met in those foster homes. This could be achieved inter alia through the establishment of a contractual relationship between the operator and the foster family. Amendment 18
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 20 (20)  In addition, given the significant numbers of animals supplied in the Union by shelters, and the need to ensure the achievement of the objectives of this Regulation regarding traceability and prevention of illegal trade, shelters should also be subject to the requirements of this Regulation concerning identification and registration of dogs and cats, regardless of whether or not their activity can be considered economic in nature. (20)  In addition, given the significant numbers of animals placed on market in the Union by shelters, and the need to ensure the achievement of the objectives of this Regulation regarding traceability and prevention of illegal trade, shelters should also be subject to the requirements of this Regulation concerning identification and registration of dogs and cats, regardless of whether or not their activity can be considered economic in nature. Operators responsible for shelters should be encouraged to take appropriate measures to prevent reproduction of the dogs or cats kept in shelters. Amendment 19
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 23 (23)  In order to ensure proper enforcement of this Regulation, it is essential that competent authorities are able to identify the establishments subject to their official controls. It is therefore necessary that operators keeping dogs and cats in establishments notify their activities to the competent authorities. (23)  In order to ensure proper enforcement of this Regulation, it is essential that competent authorities are able to identify the establishments subject to their official controls. It is therefore necessary that operators keeping dogs and cats in establishments notify their activities to the competent authorities and that the competent authorities keep an updated register of these establishments. In order to minimise the administrative burden for operators, competent authorities should be able, for that purpose, to use information or data collected in the register of dogs and cats establishments under Regulation (EU) 2016/429. Amendment 278
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 24 (24)  Well trained and skilled staff are essential for improving the welfare conditions of animals. Competencies in animal welfare require knowledge of the basic behavioural patterns and needs of the species concerned. Animal caretakers should have the competencies in animal welfare relevant to their tasks and the animals they handle, in order to avoid inflicting pain, distress and suffering on dogs and cats. (24)  The distress and suffering of dogs and cats during training activities by untrained or poorly educated handlers can have detrimental effects on the behavioural patterns of dogs and cats, with possible risks to human health and safety and the environment. Therefore, well trained and skilled staff are essential for improving the welfare conditions of animals, including when breeding, keeping and handling dogs intended for military, police and customs services. Competencies in animal welfare require knowledge of the basic behavioural patterns and needs of the species concerned. Animal caretakers should have the competencies in animal welfare relevant to their tasks and the animals they handle, in order to avoid inflicting pain, distress and suffering on dogs and cats. Animal caretakers and relevant authorities, including government agencies should regularly update their competences through training programmes promoting training methods such as ‘operant conditioning’, prioritising positive reinforcement, instead of methods based on punishment. Amendment 21
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 25 (25)  Given the fact that animal welfare includes the health of animals, veterinarians are in the best position to provide advice to operators with a view to improving the animal welfare situation in establishments. Veterinarians should play an active role in raising awareness on the interrelationship between the health and welfare of those animals. Establishments keeping dogs and cats should therefore receive a regular animal welfare visit from a veterinarian. (25)  Given the fact that animal welfare includes the health of animals, veterinarians are in the best position to provide advice to operators with a view to improving the animal welfare situation in establishments. Veterinarians should play an active role in raising awareness on the interrelationship between the health and welfare of those animals. Establishments keeping a number of dogs and cats that exceeds a certain threshold dogs and cats should therefore receive an animal welfare visit from a veterinarian within the first year of application of this Regulation or within the first year of the notification of a new establishment, thereafter the visits from a veterinarian shall take place when appropriate, based on a risk analysis by the competent authorities. Amendment 22
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 25 a (new) (25a)  In order to ensure high level of animal welfare veterinarians maintain an appropriate degree of professional independence from the operator, as well as comprehensive education and ongoing training to stay abreast of scientific and professional advances. This training may, as appropriate, also encompass elements related to recognising instances of violence and animal abuse. Amendment 23
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 25 b (new) (25b)  Where veterinarians encounter circumstances during their animal health and welfare visits that could seriously affect the welfare of dogs or cats, they are encouraged, where appropriate, to notify the relevant authorities or to consider conducting a follow-up visit to assess the situation. Amendment 24
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 25 c (new) (25c)  Ending the life of dogs and cats should preferably be assisted by a veterinarian using methods that minimise pain and distress. In exceptional cases, such as when a hunting or livestock guardian dog is severely injured in a remote location where veterinary help is not accessible, other methods may be used, provided they minimise suffering to the greatest extent possible. Amendment 25
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 26 (26)  Certain breeding strategies may lead to welfare problems for dogs and cats. By selecting certain genetic traits for aesthetic or other marketing reasons, undesirable traits from an animal welfare perspective may also be created and passed on to future generations. Therefore, operators should take measures to ensure that their breeding strategies do not lead to such negative consequences for the welfare of the dogs and cats. (26)  Certain breeding strategies may lead to welfare problems for dogs and cats. By selecting certain genetic traits for aesthetic or other marketing reasons, undesirable traits from an animal welfare perspective may also be created and passed on to future generations. Therefore, operators should take measures to ensure that their breeding strategies do not lead to such negative consequences for the welfare of the dogs and cats. In particular, breeding strategies motivated by marketing objectives can result in certain types of dogs and cats developing ‘excessive conformational traits’. Since such excessive conformational traits can lead to significant health problems for the dogs and cats concerned, breeders should exclude them from breeding programmes. Amendment 26
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 26 a (new) (26a)  Aesthetic shows, exhibitions and competitions of dogs or cats have an impact on the market opportunities and price for selling dogs and cats. Mutilations and certain breeding strategies that result in dogs or cats with excessive conformational traits can be advantageous for breeders competing in aesthetic shows, exhibitions and competitions of dogs or cats. Organising and participating in such events can be driven by factors other than animal welfare, such as aesthetic standards, with the aim of advertising certain breeds and physical characteristics. In order to ensure that breeders prioritise the welfare of the dogs and cats they produce and in particular that dogs and cats do not develop excessive conformational traits and breeders do not perform mutilations to attain unhealthy aesthetic standards, operators of breeding and selling establishments and the organisers of such shows, exhibitions and competitions should not use or include dogs or cats with excessive conformational traits or those which have been mutilated for these shows, exhibitions or competitions. Amendment 27
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 27 (27)  Scientific evidence demonstrates that inbreeding has significant negative impacts on animal health and welfare. Therefore, inbreeding of dogs and cats including first-degree and second-degree matings should be prohibited, as this increases the incidence of inherited disorders and compromises immune system function, both of which adversely impact the health and welfare of dogs and cats. (27)  Scientific evidence demonstrates that inbreeding has significant negative impacts on animal health and welfare. Therefore, inbreeding of dogs and cats between parents and offspring, between siblings, between half siblings or between grandparents and grandchildren should be prohibited, as this increases the incidence of inherited disorders and compromises immune system function, both of which adversely impact the health and welfare of dogs and cats. Inbreeding should nevertheless be possible, when necessary to preserve local breeds with a limited genetic pool provided that it is authorised for that reason by the competent authority. Amendment 28
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 29 a (new) (29a)  Scientific evidence confirms that consistent access to adequate nutrition and hydration is fundamental for the welfare of dogs and cats. It is therefore appropriate to lay down minimum requirements for operators in this respect. Feeding and drinking facilities should be kept clean, and designed, constructed and installed in such a way as to ensure equal access for all animals, thus minimising competition and avoiding agonistic behaviour. Such facilities should also be designed to minimise spillage, prevent contamination of feed and water with harmful substances, and avoid any risk of harm to dogs and cats. Amendment 29
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 30 (30)  Scientific evidence is clear about the necessity for dogs and cats of having enough space to express their natural behaviour and having normal social interactions. This is not possible where animals are kept in confinement and in cages. The keeping of dogs and cats in cages should therefore be prohibited. (30)  Scientific evidence is clear about the necessity for dogs and cats of having enough space to express their natural behaviour and having normal social interactions. This is not possible where animals are kept in confinement and in containers for long periods. The keeping of dogs and cats in containers for long periods should therefore be prohibited, except if needed for the transport and temporary, short term isolation of individual dogs and or cats and during the participation in shows, exhibitions and competitions, for puppies or kittens with reduced thermoregulation capacity or puppies or kittens together with their mothers provided that stress is minimised and suffering due to extreme temperatures is avoided and the dogs and cats are able to stand and lie down in a natural position. Amendment 30
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 33 (33)  To prevent pregnancy complications and compromising their welfare, bitches and queens should only be bred after reaching skeletal as well as sexual maturity. To allow them to physically recuperate from pregnancy and lactation, bitches and queens should only be readmitted to reproduction after a sufficient period of time. However, to prevent certain pathological reproductive conditions in bitches and queens, such as pyometra, up to three consecutive pregnancies should be allowed, followed by an adequate recuperation period. Reproduction should gradually cease in bitches and queens coming into older age. (33)  To prevent pregnancy complications and compromising their welfare, bitches and queens should not be bred before reaching appropriate maturity. To allow them to physically recuperate from pregnancy and lactation, bitches and queens should only be readmitted to reproduction after a sufficient period of time. However, to prevent certain pathological reproductive conditions in bitches and queens, such as pyometra, up to three pregnancies litters within a period of 2 years should be allowed, followed by an adequate recuperation period, which should not be less of 1 year for bitches and queens that have delivered 3 litters, including stillborns, within a period of 2 years. Reproduction should cease in bitches and queens coming into older age and in bitches and queens that have had two cesarean sections, as it cannot be excluded that an additional pregnancy will have a negative effect on their welfare. All females used for reproduction should be regularly monitored by a veterinarian. Amendment 31
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 34 a (new) (34a)  Member States should lay down rules on effective, proportionate and dissuasive sanctions for non-compliance with this Regulation, including cases of abandonment of dogs and cats by operators. Breeding establishments that engage in abusive practices compromising animal welfare should, in particular, be subject to strong and dissuasive penalties. Such practices should be unequivocally condemned, and responsible persons should be prevented from continuing their activities in any Member State. Competent authorities should ensure that animals kept in such establishments are promptly removed and provided with appropriate care and protection. Amendment 32
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 36 (36)  Procedures with the purpose of altering the appearance of or preventing certain behaviours of cats and dogs, such as ear cropping, tail docking, removal of claws and resection of vocal cords, have a serious negative impact on the welfare of cats and dogs. These procedures cause pain and prevent cats and dogs from expressing innate behaviours. For this reason, they should only be allowed if performed by a veterinarian and only when necessary for medical reasons. (36)  Procedures with the purpose of altering the appearance of or preventing certain behaviours of cats and dogs, such as ear cropping, tail docking, removal of claws and resection of vocal cords, have a serious negative impact on the welfare of cats and dogs. These procedures cause pain and prevent cats and dogs from expressing innate behaviours. For this reason, they can only be allowed if performed by a veterinarian and only when necessary for medical reasons. However, for certain breeds, f.e. for hunting dogs, such procedures could be allowed for prophylactic, diagnostic and/or therapeutic reasons, and only if carried out by a veterinarian. In specific contexts and regions of Europe, tail docking may also be justified to prevent tail injuries, provided it is based on a full and thorough medical evaluation. Amendment 33
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 36 a (new) (36a)  Dogs used in the military, police and customs services normally undergo a very specific type of training to be prepared in the interest of national security. In order to have the possibility to attain the training deemed most appropriate, Member States should be able to grant derogations for dogs kept in breeding or selling establishments which are destined to be military, police or custom dogs. Amendment 34
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 37 (37)  The conditions in breeding establishments are particularly critical to ensure that dogs and cats are properly kept and treated before being placed on the market. It is therefore important that those establishments are approved by the competent authorities and are subject to onsite pre-inspection before their approval. It is also important that a list of those approved establishments is publicly available to allow potential buyers to verify the status of their suppliers. Since all establishments have an extended time for application of requirements on housing and health, it is necessary that the obligation of breeding establishments to obtain an approval should start to apply on the same date as the requirements for housing and health. (37)  Prior inspection of establishments by official veterinarians or other professionals, in case the official control task has been delegated, and consequent approval of establishments is an effective way to ensure that establishments comply with the requirements of this Regulation. However, given the limited availability of official veterinarians in Member States, it is not proportionate to require prior on-site inspection and approval for all establishments so that official veterinarians should focus on establishments representing a higher risk from the point of view of animal welfare. The conditions in breeding establishments are particularly critical to ensure that dogs and cats are properly bred, kept and treated before being placed on the market, in particular due to the consequences that poor animal welfare conditions at an early age can have for dogs and cats. It is therefore important that those establishments are approved by the competent authorities and are subject to onsite pre-inspection before their approval. It is also important that a list of those approved establishments is publicly available to allow potential buyers to verify the status of the breeding establishments and thus to strengthen public control and citizens’ awareness. Amendment 35
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 38 (38)  Some operators placing on the market dogs and cats, or shelters supplying dogs and cats, encourage potential customers to buy at any cost using emotional arguments, without mentioning to the potential owner the consequences of owning a pet animal. Other operators or shelters insist on the responsibility attached to pet ownership and this has the effect of limiting their ability to sell animals. This discrepancy of attitudes of operators tends to advantage less responsible operators, leading to distortions of competition despite the importance for animal welfare and public order of informing customers about their responsibility when buying a dog or a cat. It is therefore justified to require that all suppliers of dogs and cats in the Union market for use as pets inform future owners on their responsibility. In addition, where the supply of a dog or cat is facilitated by online means, an appropriate warning should accompany the online advertisement to efficiently convey the message of responsible ownership. (38)  Some operators placing on the market dogs and cats encourage potential customers to buy at any cost using emotional arguments, without mentioning to the potential owner the consequences of owning a pet animal. Other operators or shelters insist on the responsibility attached to pet ownership and this has the effect of limiting their ability to sell animals. This discrepancy of attitudes of operators tends to advantage less responsible operators, leading to distortions of competition despite the importance for animal welfare and public order of informing customers about their responsibility when buying a dog or a cat. It is therefore justified to require that all operators placing of dogs and cats in the Union market for use as pets inform future owners on their responsibility. In addition, where the placing on the market of a dog or cat is facilitated by online means, an appropriate warning should accompany the online advertisement to efficiently convey the message of responsible ownership. Amendment 36
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 39 (39)  Illegal trafficking and fraudulent practices in relation to the sale or transfer of dogs and cats for adoption is facilitated by the absence of traceability given the lack of identification and registration requirements for those animals. Furthermore, fraudulent practices may appear when the systems for the identification and registration of dogs and cats are not harmonised or cannot be easily operated because technical systems are not interoperable. It is therefore essential to harmonize the standards for the means of identification and registration and to ensure that the identification and registration of dogs and cats is completed before the animal is supplied in the Union for the first time. Suppliers of dogs and cats should provide evidence of identification and registration in one of the databases established by Member States for this purpose, before the first placing on the market of the animal in the Union. Subsequently, at every change of ownership or responsibility for the animal, the supplier must provide proof of identification and registration of the animal in one of the databases. For the sake of proportionality, natural persons supplying dogs and cats occasionally by other means than online platforms should not be subject to this obligation. (39)  Illegal trafficking and fraudulent practices in relation to the sale or transfer of dogs and cats for adoption is facilitated by the absence of traceability given the lack of identification and registration requirements for those animals. Furthermore, fraudulent practices may appear when the systems for the identification and registration of dogs and cats are not harmonised or cannot be easily operated because technical systems are not interoperable. It is therefore essential to harmonize the standards for the means of identification and registration and to ensure that the identification and registration of dogs and cats is completed before the animal placed on the Union market for the first time. Natural or legal persons placing of dogs and cats should provide evidence of identification and registration in one of the databases established by Member States for this purpose, before the first placing on the market of the animal in the Union. Subsequently, at every change of ownership or responsibility for the animal the change should be registered accordingly in one of the databases. For the sake of proportionality, natural persons supplying dogs and cats occasionally by other means than online platforms should not be subject to this obligation. Amendment 37
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 40 (40)  Suppliers of dogs and cats should not only provide evidence of identification, showing a document referring to the code of the transponder implanted in the animal but also evidence of the registration of that animal into an official database. This allows key information about the animal to be passed on to the new owner and ensures traceability. (40)  Natural or legal persons placing dogs and cats on the Union market should not only provide evidence of identification, showing a document referring to the code of the transponder implanted in the animal but also evidence of the registration of that animal into an official database. This allows key information about the animal to be passed on to the new owner and ensures traceability. Amendment 38
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 41 (41)  As most dogs and cats are currently offered for sale or donation by means of listings placed on online platforms, providers of online platforms should act diligently when intermediating access to dogs and cats. Therefore, without prejudice to Regulation (EU) 2022/2065, online platforms should be required to adapt the modalities of their listings for dogs and cats so that suppliers provide proofs of the identification and registration of the dogs and cats intended for sale or donation. In addition, the Commission should ensure the development of a system publicly available free of charge allowing to verify the authenticity of the identification and registration of a dog or a cat. This measure aims to better combat fraud by improving the traceability of dogs and cats supplied in the Union to their origin, allowing better controls by competent authorities and ultimately improving the welfare of these animals. This should not amount to an obligation for online platforms to generally monitor the listings offered through their platform, nor to a general fact-finding obligation aimed at assessing the accuracy of the identification and registration prior to the publication of the offer. (41)  As most dogs and cats are currently offered for sale or donation by means of advertisements placed on online platforms, providers of online platforms should act diligently when intermediating access to dogs and cats. Therefore, without prejudice to Regulation (EU) 2022/2065, online platforms should be required to adapt the modalities of their advertisements for dogs and cats so that natural or legal persons placing dogs or cats on the Union market provide proofs of the identification and registration of the dogs and cats intended for sale or donation. In addition, the Commission should ensure the development of a system publicly available free of charge allowing to verify the authenticity of the identification and registration of a dog or a cat. This measure aims to better combat fraud by improving the traceability of dogs and cats placed on the Union to their origin, allowing better controls by competent authorities and ultimately improving the welfare of these animals. This should not amount to an obligation for online platforms to generally monitor the listings offered through their platform, nor to a general fact-finding obligation aimed at assessing the accuracy of the identification and registration prior to the publication of the offer. Amendment 39
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 43 (43)  To ensure traceability of dogs and cats, animals should not only be marked with a unique identifier in the form of transponder, but their identification should also be registered in a database. Therefore, Member States that do not yet have national databases for dogs and cats should establish such databases so that identification can be reliable and verified. In addition, to ensure traceability within the Union, these national databases should be interoperable, allowing competent authorities and relevant stakeholders to verify the authenticity of the identification. (43)  To ensure traceability of dogs and cats, they should not only be individually identified with a unique identifier in the form of a transponder, but their identification should also be registered in a database. Therefore, Member States should be required to establish and maintain databases of dogs and cats placed on the Union market to ensure the traceability of these animals. It is also necessary to ensure the interoperability of these databases. This will make it easier for information on dogs and cats to be accessed across the Union, as well as enable competent authorities to carry out official checks to ensure compliance with animal welfare rules. In order to facilitate the interoperability between national databases, the Commission should establish an index database. Amendment 40
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 44 a (new) (44a)  In order to streamline cross-border movements of identified and registered dogs and cats, and to ensure timely access by veterinarians to relevant medical information, Member States are encouraged to establish a digital passport system. This digital document should include essential data on the animal’s identification and vaccination status, thereby enhancing both animal health management and administrative efficiency. Amendment 41
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 44 b (new) (44b)  The data protection in relation to the processing of personal data is a fundamental right. Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 of the European Parliament and of the Council lays down rules on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data by the Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies and on the free movement of such data. Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council applies to the processing of personal data carried out by Member States in the course of the relevant procedures. Amendment 42
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 44 c (new) (44c)  The data protection in relation to the processing of personal data is a fundamental right. Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 of the European Parliament and of the Council lays down rules on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data by the Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies and on the free movement of such data. Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council applies to the processing of personal data carried out by Member States in the course of the relevant procedures. The roles of the Commission and of the Member States in relation to the processing of personal data in cases under this Regulation need to be defined clearly in order to ensure a high level of data protection. Amendment 43
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 46 (46)  The provisions mentioned in the previous recital should be enforced through a listing of third countries approved to supply of dogs and cats to the Union based on a Commission assessment of the reliability of their official controls to enforce the animal welfare rules required under this Regulation, or equivalent rules, in establishments on their territory which supply or intend to supply dogs and cats to the Union. In addition, a list of establishments breeding and keeping dogs and cats in those third countries, and which are allowed to export those animals to the Union, should be established to ensure traceability and controls at Union Border Control Posts. The Commission should, following a risk-based approach, carry out audits of the reliability of official control system of third countries approved under this Regulation as well as those requesting to be approved under this Regulation. (46)  Enforcement of import rules should be ensured through a listing of third countries approved to place dogs and cats on the Union market based on a Commission assessment of the reliability of their official controls to enforce the animal welfare rules required under this Regulation, or recognised by the Union as equivalent rules, in establishments on their territory which export or intend to export dogs and cats to the Union market. In addition, a list of establishments breeding and keeping dogs and cats in those third countries, and which are allowed to export those animals to the Union, should be established to ensure traceability and controls at Union Border Control Posts. The Commission should, following a risk-based approach, carry out audits of the reliability of official control system of third countries approved under this Regulation as well as those requesting to be approved under this Regulation. Lastly, compliance with the relevant rules of this Regulation or with rules recognised by the Union as equivalent rules should be certified in the relevant health certificate used for such exports. For that purpose, the Commission should endeavour to amend the relevant model of official certificate, in order to include the related animal welfare attestation. Amendment 44
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 46 a (new) (46a)  To enhance consumer protection and to ensure the proper traceability of imports of dogs and cats into the Union, it is appropriate to require that they be identified before their entry and that the importers ensure their registration in one of the Member States’ databases. This will result in greater control on the movements of those animals. Furthermore, the EU Coordinated Action on the illegal trade of cats and dogs carried out in 2022 and 2023 demonstrated that one of the common fraudulent practices with the trade in dogs and cats consists in importing into the Union dogs and cats intended for trade claiming that those movements are non-commercial movements as defined by Union animal health rules, namely movements of dogs and cats accompanying their owners or a person authorised by the owner without the intention to transfer ownership. In order to provide tools for Member States to perform risk-based checks targeting this fraudulent practice, it is essential that the entry of dogs and cats as non-commercial be pre-notified through a dedicated Union pet travellers’ database. This database should collect notifications for all such entries into the Union regardless of the point of entry, for Member States to have the necessary overview and detect suspicious movements. For that reason it is appropriate that the Commission establish and maintain that database so that Member States have access to all available information for their checks. Amendment 45
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 47 (47)  Under Regulation (EU) 2016/429, a list of third countries authorised for the purpose of entry into the Union of dogs and cats is established for the purpose of managing the risk of introducing transmissible animal diseases into the Union. The list of third countries mentioned in the previous recital should therefore be limited to third countries authorised under Regulation (EU) 2016/429 and which provide appropriate guarantees of the capacity of their competent authority to control and ensure compliance of the establishments breeding and keeping dogs and cats for export to the Union with the animal welfare requirements set out in this Regulation. (47)  Under Regulation (EU) 2016/429, a list of third countries authorised for the purpose of entry into the Union of dogs and cats is established for the purpose of managing the risk of introducing transmissible animal diseases into the Union. The list of third countries mentioned in recital 46 should therefore be limited to third countries authorised under Regulation (EU) 2016/429 and which provide appropriate guarantees of the capacity of their competent authority to control and ensure compliance of the establishments breeding and keeping dogs and cats for export to the Union with the animal welfare requirements set out in this Regulation. Amendment 46
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 47 a (new) (47a)  In order to effectively trace the origin of the dog or a cat in the third country and to address illegal imports into the Union and fraudulent practices under the pretext of non-commercial movements as defined by Union Animal Health rules, it is important that dogs and cats are imported from third countries in compliance with this Regulation as regards their registration into a Member State database within 2 working days after their entry into the Union. Amendment 47
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 48 (48)  In order to take into account technical progress and scientific developments, and their social, economic and environmental impacts, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 TFEU should be delegated to the Commission for the purpose of amending Article 6 to this Regulation so that breeding strategies do not result in genotypes that have detrimental effects on the health or welfare of the dogs and cats. (48)  In order to take into account technical progress and scientific developments, especially the opinions of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), and their social, economic and environmental impacts, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 TFEU should be delegated to the Commission for the purpose of supplementing Article 6a of this Regulation to define the characteristics of genotypes, phenotypes, and excessive conformational traits that should be excluded from reproduction, so that breeding strategies do not result in genotypes that have detrimental effects on the health or welfare of the dogs and cats. In the context of aesthetic shows, exhibitions, and competitions, after considering both EFSA’s scientific opinion and the specific social and economic circumstances of the sector, the delegated acts should reflect a progressive and balanced approach, in order to ensure proportionate and practically achievable implementation.” Amendment 48
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 52 – indent 2 –  Article 17(5) to specify the information to be provided by suppliers as proof of identification and registration of dogs and cats, both in cases where they are offered through online platforms and by other means; deleted Amendment 49
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 52 – indent 6 –  Article 21(5) to establish a procedure for the recognition by the Union of equivalence of the conditions under which dogs and cats are bred and kept in establishments in a third country which intends to export animals to the Union, with the provisions of this Regulation regarding establishments. deleted Amendment 50
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 53 a (new) (53a)  The Member states may consider raising awareness about animal welfare and responsible animal care. Amendment 51
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 55 (55)  It is essential that Union legislation is subject to regular monitoring and evaluation so it can be adjusted in order to achieve the expected impacts. Therefore, this Regulation should contain an obligation for the Commission to perform monitoring on the welfare of dogs and cats in the Union and to carry out an evaluation to be presented to other Union institutions. (55)  It is essential that Union legislation is subject to regular monitoring and evaluation so it can be adjusted in order to achieve the expected impacts. Therefore, this Regulation should contain an obligation for the Commission to perform monitoring on the welfare of dogs and cats in the Union and to carry out an evaluation to be presented to other Union institutions. The evaluation should asses the technological and scientific developments that have occurred, including the means of identification of dogs or cats and the possibility of using alternative means which are less invasive than the implantation of a transponder. The evaluation should also guarantee the fraud-proof and robust character of the Union’s traceability system as well as the proportionality of the cost of identification for natural and legal persons subjected to the identification obligation under this Regulation. Amendments 282 and 311
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point b (b)  the traceability of dogs and cats placed on the Union market or supplied in the Union. (b)  the traceability of dogs and cats bred or kept in the Union or placed on the Union market. Amendment 53
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 2 – paragraph 1 1.  This Regulation shall apply to the breeding, keeping and placing on the market of dogs and cats, as well as their supplying in the Union. 1.  This Regulation shall apply to the breeding, keeping, placing on the market and entry into the Union of dogs and cats. Amendment 54
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 2 – paragraph 2 2.  This Regulation shall not apply to the breeding, keeping, placing on the market or supplying of dogs or cats intended for scientific purposes. 2.  This Regulation shall not apply to the breeding, keeping, placing on the market or supplying of dogs or cats intended for scientific purposes or for clinical trials required for the marketing authorisation of veterinary medicinal products. Amendment 55
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 2 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a.  This Regulation shall not apply to: –  natural persons who keep dogs or cats for personal or familial enjoyment and companionship, and who allow such animals to reproduce, limited to a maximum of one litter per species per household, per 18 months, without placing them on the market; –  and to agricultural holdings, with the exception of the provisions laid down under Article 5. Amendment 284
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 2 – paragraph 2 b (new) 2b.   Notwithstanding paragraph 2 of this Article, the requirements relating to identification and registration laid down in Article 17 shall apply to all dogs and cats held under the responsibility of natural persons. Amendment 56
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1 a (new) 1a.  ‘Dogs that perform specific, working or professional activities’: means those animals which, having been selected for their physical, instinctive and temperamental qualities, are trained to assist people in a regulated activity or specific task, such as those used for hunting, working, herding, rescue, assistance or for sporting purposes or those used by law enforcement agencies, as well as guide animals, guide dogs or animals intended for zootherapy that have been trained in centres or by specialised professionals to support, guide and assist people with functional diversities; Amendment 57
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 3 a (new) 3a.  “breeding” means the activity of keeping dogs or cats in breeding establishments for the purpose of reproduction; Amendment 58
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 3 b (new) 3b.  “advertising” means any form of communication which has the direct or indirect effect of promoting a dog or cat in order to attract interest, engagement or sales, including the promotion of a breed or a physical characteristic; Amendment 59
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 4 4.  ‘keeping’ means any activity during which an animal is detained or handled in an establishment; 4.  ‘keeping’ means any activity during which dogs and cats are held, housed, detained or handled in an establishment or under the responsibility of an operator; Amendment 303
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 5 5.  ‘placing on the market’ means the keeping of dogs and cats for the purpose of sale, offering for sale, distribution or any other form of transfer of ownership or responsibility for the animal, that is against consideration or at least reimbursement of the costs incurred, including the advertising of animals for the above purposes; 5.  ‘placing on the market’ means the sale, offering for sale, distribution or any other form of transfer of ownership or responsibility, whether in return for payment or free of charge, excluding occasional and irregular donations of small numbers of dogs and cats by natural persons by means other than via the intermediation of an online platform, as well as the advertising of animals for the above purposes; Amendment 61
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 6 6.  ‘supplying’ means the transferring of ownership or responsibility for dogs or cats through any means or form, whether for a consideration or not, excluding occasional supplies by natural persons of dogs or cats by other means than via the intermediation of an online platform; deleted Amendment 62
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 7 7.  ‘online platforms’ means an online platform, as defined in Article 3, point (i), of Regulation (EU) 2022/2065, intermediating the placing on the market or the sypplying of dogs and cats; 7.  ‘online platforms’ means an online platform, as defined in Article 3, point (i), of Regulation (EU) 2022/2065, intermediating the placing on the market or of dogs or cats; Amendment 63
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 8 8.  ‘listing’ means the publication, on an online platform, of an advertisement for the supply of a dog or a cat; deleted Amendment 64
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 10 a (new) 10a.  ‘livestock guardian dog’ means a dog primarily, kept or trained to manage, move, or control livestock in agricultural or pastoral settings, including farms, grazing areas, or during transport; Amendment 65
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 11 11.  ‘establishments’ means breeding establishments, animal shelters and pet shops; 11.  ‘establishments’ means breeding establishments, selling establishments, shelters and foster homes; Amendment 66
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 12 12.  ‘breeding establishments’ means any premises or structure, where dogs and cats are kept for reproduction purposes with a view to placing their offspring on the market, including households; 12.  ‘breeding establishments’ means any premises or structure, where dogs or cats are kept for reproduction purposes with a view to placing their offspring on the market, including households; Amendment 67
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 12 a (new) 12a.  ‘agricultural holding means an agricultural holding within the meaning of Regulation (EU) 2018/1091 that is not a breeding establishment as defined in this Regulation; Amendment 68
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 13 13.  ‘pet shops’ means any premises or structure where dogs and cats are kept for sale as pet animals, without having been born there; 13.  ‘selling establishments’ means any premises or structure where dogs or cats are kept for sale without having been born there; Amendment 69
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 14 14.  ‘animal shelters’ means any premises or structure, excluding households, operated by a natural or legal person, where unwanted, abandoned, formal stray, lost or confiscated dogs and cats are kept for the purpose of supply, whether for consideration or at no cost; 14.  ‘shelters’ means any premises or structure, including households, operated by a natural or legal person, where unwanted, abandoned, formal stray, lost or confiscated dogs or cats are kept for the purpose of placing on the market; Amendment 70
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 14 a (new) 14a.  ‘foster home’ means a household that keeps dogs or cats on behalf of an operator responsible for unwanted, abandoned, stray, lost or confiscated dogs and cats; Amendment 71
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 15 15.  ‘operator’ means any natural or legal person, excluding those responsible for shelters, who breeds, keeps, trades or places on the market dogs and cats under his/her control, including for a limited period of time; 15.  ‘operator’ means any natural or legal person, that places dogs and cats on the market and that is responsible for a breeding establishment, a selling establishment or a shelter or that is responsible for dogs or cats kept therein, or that is responsible for unwanted, abandoned, stray, lost or confiscated and places them in foster homes; Amendment 72
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 16 16.  ‘supplier’ means any natural or legal person supplying a dog or a cat, including natural or legal persons responsible for shelters; deleted Amendment 73
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 18 a (new) 18a.  ‘euthanasia’ means the act of inducing death under anaesthesia and prolonged analgesia using medicinal products, using a method that causes a rapid and irreversible loss of consciousness with minimum pain and distress to an animal; Amendment 74
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 19 19.  ‘mutilation’ means an intervention, including a surgical intervention, carried out for reasons other than therapeutic or diagnostic purposes, which results in damage to or the loss of a sensitive part of the body or the alteration of bone structure; 19.  ‘mutilation’ means an intervention, including a surgical intervention, carried out for reasons other than therapeutic or diagnostic purposes, and other than neutering or implantation of a transponder, which results in damage to or the loss of a sensitive part of the body or the alteration of bone structure of a dog or a cat ; Amendment 75
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 19 a (new) 19a.  “Neutering” means the process whereby dogs or cats are surgically prevented from reproducing, including the surgical removal of gonads, namely the testicles in male cats and dogs and either the ovaries or the ovaries and the uterus in bitches and queens; Amendment 76
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 19 b (new) 19b.  “Non-surgical sterilisation” means alternatives to surgical sterilisation or neutering that preserve the integrity of the body of dog or cat and do not result in the removal or permanent alteration of any part of the dog or cat body; Amendment 77
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 20 20.  ‘suffering’ means an unpleasant, undesired physical or mental state of being, which is the result of an animal being exposed to noxious stimuli or the absence of important positive stimuli; 20.  ‘suffering’ means an unpleasant, undesired physical or mental state of being, which is the result of an animal being exposed to noxious stimuli or the continuous absence of important positive stimuli; Amendment 78
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 21 21.  ‘housing’ means buildings or delimited outdoor space in establishments where dogs and cats are kept; 21.  ‘housing’ means buildings or delimited outdoor space in establishments where dogs and cats are kept whether temporarily or permanently; Amendment 79
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 22 22.  ‘kennel’ means a physical structure containing one or more individual enclosures for housing dogs; 22.  ‘kennel’ means a physical structure containing one or more enclosures for housing dogs; Amendment 80
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 23 23.  ‘cattery’ means a physical structure containing one or more individual enclosures for housing cats; 23.  ‘cattery’ means a physical structure containing one or more enclosures for housing cats; Amendment 81
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 24 24.  ‘animal caretaker’ means a person taking care of the dogs and cats bred or kept in an establishment; 24.  ‘animal caretaker’ means a person taking care of the dogs and cats bred or kept in an establishment including volunteers, interns and part-time workers; Amendment 82
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 26 26.  ‘tethering’ means the tying of an animal to an anchor point to keep it in a desired area; 26.  ‘tethering’ means the tying of an animal to an anchor point or object to keep it in a desired area or to restrict its movement; Amendment 83
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 27 27.  ‘container’ means any crate, box, receptacle or other rigid structure used to confine dogs and cats; 27.  ‘container’ means any cage, crate, box, receptacle or movable structure used to confine dogs or cats; Amendment 84
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 28 28.  ‘pet animal’ means a dog or cat intended to be kept in a household for private enjoyment and companionship; deleted Amendment 85
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 29 29.  ‘responsible ownership’ means the commitment of a dog or cat owner or future dog or cat owner, to perform various duties focused on the satisfaction of the behavioural, environmental and physical needs of the dog or cat, and to prevent risks that the dog or cat may pose to the community, other animals or the environment. 29.  ‘responsible ownership’ means the commitment of a dog or cat owner or future dog or cat owner, to perform various duties focused on the satisfaction of the health, behavioural, environmental and physical needs of the dog or cat, and to minimize risks that the dog or cat may pose to the community, other animals or the environment. Amendment 86
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 4 – paragraph 1 – introductory part This chapter shall not apply to: With the exception of the provisions laid down in Article 5 this chapter shall not apply to: Amendment 304
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 4 – paragraph 1 – indent 1 –  breeding establishments keeping up to three bitches or queens and producing in total two litters or less per establishment and calendar year; –  breeding establishment where at most two litters per calendar year are produced for placing on the market shall only be subject to the obligations laid down in Article 5, Article 6(1), (1a) and (1b), Articles 6a, 7 and 8, Article 11(2), (3) and (4), Article 12(3), (4) and (7), Article 13(2), points (b), (c) and (d), Article 14(2), (3), (4) and (5a), Article 15 and Article 15a(1). Amendment 88
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 4 – paragraph 1 – indent 2 –  pet shops keeping at any given time three dogs or less or six cats or less; deleted Amendment 89
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 4 – paragraph 1 – indent 3 a (new) –  foster homes keeping at any given time five dogs or less or ten cats or less. Amendment 90
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 5 – title General principles of welfare General welfare principles Amendment 91
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 5 – paragraph 1 – introductory part Operators and natural or legal persons responsible for shelters shall apply the following principles with respect to dogs and cats bred or kept in their establishment: Operators and animal caretakers shall apply the following welfare principles with respect to dogs or cats bred or kept in their establishment: Amendment 92
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a (a)  dogs and cats are provided with water and feed of a quality and of a quantity that enables them to have good nutrition and hydration. (a)  dogs and cats are provided with water and feed of a quality and of a quantity that enables them to have good and appropriate nutrition and hydration. Amendment 93
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b (b)  dogs and cats are kept in a good physical environment which is comfortable, especially in terms of space, temperature, and ease of movement. (b)  dogs and cats are kept in an appropriate and clean physical environment which is secure and comfortable, especially in terms of space, air quality, temperature, light, protection against adverse climatic conditions and ease of movement, preventing overcrowding. Amendment 94
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point c (c)  dogs and cats are kept safe, clean and in good health by preventing diseases, functional impairments, injuries, and pain, due in particular to management, handling practices, or mutilations. (c)  dogs and cats are kept safe, clean and in good health by preventing diseases, functional impairments, injuries, and pain, due in particular to management, handling practices, breeding practices or mutilations. Amendment 95
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point e (e)  dogs and cats are kept in such a way as to optimise their mental state by preventing or reducing their negative experiences in time and intensity, as well as by maximizing opportunities for positive experiences in time and intensity in the different domains referred to in paragraphs (a) to (d). (e)  dogs and cats are kept in such a way as to optimise their mental state by preventing or reducing their negative experiences in duration and intensity, as well as by maximizing opportunities for positive experiences in duration and intensity, preventing the development of abnormal repetitive and other behaviours indicative of negative animal welfare, and taking into consideration the individual dog’s or cat’s needs in the different domains referred to in paragraphs (a) to (d). Amendment 96
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 6 – title General welfare requirements for dogs and cats General welfare obligations Amendment 97
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 6 – paragraph 1 1.  Operators and natural or legal persons responsible for shelters shall be responsible for the welfare of dogs and cats kept under their control and for minimising any risks to their welfare. 1.  Operators and animal caretakers shall be responsible for the welfare of dogs or cats kept in their establishments and under their control and to minimise any risks to their welfare. In the case of foster homes, the responsibility shall lie with the operator on whose behalf dogs or cats are kept. Such operators shall provide the foster family with adequate information on the animal welfare requirements and obligations as well as the individual needs of the dogs or cats, and shall ensure and verify that the relevant obligations set out by this Regulation are complied with in foster homes. Amendment 98
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 6 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a.  Operators shall not subject any dog or cat to cruelty, abuse or mistreatment, nor shall they breed, train or medicate them to participate in activities resulting in cruelty, abuse or mistreatment to themselves or to other dogs and cats, including dog fighting. Amendment 99
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 6 – paragraph 1 b (new) 1b.  Operators and animal caretakers shall not abandon dogs or cats. Amendment 101
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 6 – paragraph 3 3.  Operators of breeding establishments shall ensure that breeding strategies do not result in genotypes and phenotypes that have detrimental effects on the welfare of the dogs and cats, or of their descendants. deleted In the management of the reproduction of dogs and cats by operators, the mating between parents and offspring, or between grandparents and grandchildren, shall be prohibited. This paragraph shall not preclude the selection and breeding of brachycephalic dogs and cats provided that the selection or breeding programmes minimise the negative welfare consequences of brachycephalic traits. Amendment 102
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 6 – paragraph 4 4.  The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 23 amending this article as regards the specific criteria that operators shall fulfil when designing breeding strategies to meet the requirements of paragraph 3, taking into account scientific opinions of the European Food Safety Authority as well as social, economic and environmental impacts. deleted Amendment 103
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 6 a (new) Article 6a Breeding strategies obligations 1.  Operators of breeding establishments shall ensure that their breeding strategies prioritise the health and welfare of the animal, and minimise the risk of producing dogs or cats with genotypes or phenotypes associated with detrimental effects on their welfare 2.  Operators of breeding establishments shall not use for reproduction dogs or cats that have excessive conformational traits leading to a high risk of detrimental effects on the welfare of these dogs or cats, or of their offspring. 3.  The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 23 supplementing this Regulation by laying down the characteristics of the genotypes and phenotypes referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article, and the excessive conformational traits referred to in paragraph 2 of this Article, which shall be excluded from reproduction, taking into account scientific opinions of the European Food Safety Authority as well as social and economic impacts. The delegated acts concerning the excessive conformational traits shall be adopted by 1 July 2030. 4.  Unless approved by the competent authority based on a specific need to preserve local breeds with a limited genetic pool, the breeding between parents and offspring, between siblings, between halfsiblings or between grandparents and grandchildren shall be prohibited in the management of the reproduction of dogs and cats. Amendment 104
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 7 – title Obligation to notify the breeding or keeping of dogs and cats in establishments Notification and registration of establishments Amendment 105
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 7 – paragraph 1 – introductory part Operators and natural or legal persons responsible for shelters shall notify to the competent authorities of their activity, providing the following information: Operators shall notify to the competent authorities of their activity, providing at least the following information: Amendment 106
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point c (c)  the type of establishment: breeding establishment, pet shop or shelter; (c)  the type of establishment: breeding establishment, selling establishment shelter or foster home; Amendment 107
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point e (e)  the maximum number of animals which can be kept in the establishment; (e)  the capacity of the establishment expressed as the maximum number of dogs and cats which can be kept in the establishment. Amendment 108
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 7 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 a (new) Operators shall notify the competent authority of: (a)  any changes concerning the information referred to in paragraph 1; (b)  any cessation of activity and also specifying a deadline by which the activity must be closed, which should be no later than one month after the cessation, and also providing information on the fate of the animals; Without prejudice to any additional information required under this Article, operators are not required to notify again the information already submitted in accordance with point (b) of Article 84(1) of Regulation (EU) 2016/429. The competent authority shall maintain a register of establishments and may use for this purpose the register provided for in point (a) of Article 101(1) of Regulation (EU) 2016/429. Amendment 109
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 7 a (new) Article 7a Approval of breeding establishments 1.  Operators of breeding establishments shall only place dogs or cats on the market after approval of their establishment by the competent authority. 2.  The competent authority shall perform on-site inspections to verify that the establishment meets the requirements of this Regulation. Member States may allow such inspections to be carried out remotely provided that the means of distance communication used provide sufficient evidence for the competent authority to perform reliable inspections. The competent authority shall only grant a certificate of approval to a breeding establishment that meets the requirements of this Regulation. 3.  The competent authorities shall maintain a list of the approved breeding establishments and make it publicly available. Amendment 110
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 8 – paragraph 1 1.  When operators and natural or legal persons responsible for shelters place on the market or supply dogs or cats for purposes of keeping them as pet animals, they shall provide to the acquirer of pet the information necessary to enable him or her to ensure the welfare of the animal, including information on responsible ownership. 1.  Operators shall provide to the acquirer of a dog or cat written information necessary to enable him or her to ensure the welfare of the dog or cat including information on responsible ownership and on the specific needs of the dog or cat in terms of feeding, caring, health, housing and behavioural needs, as well as information on its health, including vaccination status. Amendment 111
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 8 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 2.  When the supplying of dogs and cats is advertised via online means, the listing shall display, in clearly visible and bold characters, the following warning: 2.  When operators and the natural or legal persons advertise the placing on the market of dogs and cats, via online platforms at least the following warning shall be displayed, in clearly visible and bold characters: Amendment 288
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 8 – paragraph 2 2.  When the supplying of dogs and cats is advertised via online means, the listing shall display, in clearly visible and bold characters, the following warning: 2.  When the supplying of dogs and cats is advertised via online means, the listing shall display, in clearly visible and bold characters, the following warning: “An animal is not a toy. Buying or adopting an animal is a life-changing decision. As an animal owner, you are obliged to ensure that all the needs for its health and well-being are met at all times.” “An animal is not a toy. Buying or adopting an animal is a life-changing decision. As an animal owner, you are obliged to ensure its health and well-being needs are met at all times. Taking care of an animal requires financial resources. It is forbidden to abandon the animal once it is in your care.” Amendment 113
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 9 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1.  Animal caretakers shall have the following competences as regards the dogs and cats they are handling: 1.  Animal caretakers, with the exception of supervised volunteers and interns, shall have the following competences as regards the dogs and cats they are handling: Amendment 114
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point b (b)  ability to recognise their expressions including any sign of suffering and to identify the appropriate mitigating measures to be taken in such cases; (b)  ability to recognise their expressions including any sign of suffering and to identify and take the appropriate mitigating measures to be taken in such cases; Amendment 115
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point c (c)  ability to apply good animal management practices, to use and maintain the equipment used for the species under their care and to minimize any risks to the welfare of the animals; (c)  ability to apply good animal management practices, to use and maintain the equipment used for the species under their care and to minimize any risks to the welfare of the animals, preventing suffering; Amendment 116
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 10 – title Animal welfare visits Advisory welfare visits Amendment 117
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 10 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1.  Operators and natural or legal persons responsible for shelters shall: 1.  Operators shall: Amendment 277
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point a (a)  ensure that the establishments under their responsibility receive, at least once a year, a visit by a veterinarian, for the purpose of advising the operator or the natural or legal person responsible for the shelter on measures to address any risk factor for animal welfare; (a)  ensure that by … [1 year after the date of application of this Regulation] or within the first year from the date of the notification of a new establishment, the establishments under their responsibility receive, at least once a year, an unannounced visit by an official veterinarian, hired by the competent authority, for the purpose of identifying and assessing any risk factor for animal welfare, advising the operator or the natural or legal person responsible for the shelter on measures to address risks for animal welfare, health and the environment and, if the findings indicate severe risk factors, a report to the competent authority in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2017/625 and a follow-up visit within two months; Amendment 119
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point b (b)  record the findings of the visit of the veterinarian referred to in point (a) and their follow up actions and keep those records for at least 6 years, making them available to the competent authorities upon request. (b)  keep the records of the findings of the visit of the veterinarian referred to in point (a) and of their follow up actions and keep those records for at least 5 years, from the day of the visit, and shall make them available to the competent authorities and visiting veterinarian upon request. Amendment 120
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 10 – paragraph 2 2.  The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 23 supplementing this Article to lay down minimum criteria to be assessed during animal welfare visits. 2.  By [24 months from the date of entry into force of this Regulation] the Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 23 supplementing this Article to lay down minimum criteria to identify and assess the risk factors by the veterinarian during the advisory welfare visits, including on follow-up actions. Amendment 121
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 11 – paragraph 1 1.  Operators and natural or legal persons responsible for shelters shall ensure that dogs and cats are fed in accordance with the requirements laid down in point 1 of Annex I and may, based on the written advice of a veterinarian or an animal nutrition expert, adjust the feeding frequencies provided for in point 1 of Annex I. 1.  Operators shall ensure that dogs or cats are fed in accordance with the requirements laid down in point 1 of Annex I. Amendment 122
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 11 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2.  Operators and natural or legal persons responsible for shelters shall ensure that dogs and cats are adequately fed and hydrated by supplying: 2.  Operators shall ensure that dogs or cats are adequately fed and hydrated by supplying: Amendment 123
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point a (a)  potable water, ad libitum; (a)  clean and fresh water, ad libitum; Amendment 124
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point b (b)  feed in sufficient quantity and quality to meet the physiological, nutritional and metabolic needs and satiety of the dogs and cats, as part of a diet adapted to the age, breed, category, activity level, and health status of the dogs and cats; (b)  feed in sufficient quantity and quality to meet the physiological, nutritional and metabolic needs and satiety of the dogs and cats, as part of a diet adapted to the age, breed, category, activity level, and health status of the dogs and cats or cats, with the overall objective of achieving and maintaining good health; Amendment 125
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 11 – paragraph 3 – introductory part 3.  Operators and natural or legal persons responsible for shelters shall ensure that feeding and drinking facilities are constructed and installed in such a way as to: 3.  Operators and caretakers shall ensure that feeding and drinking facilities are kept clean and constructed and installed in such a way as to: Amendment 126
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 11 – paragraph 3 – point a (a)  provide equal access to all dogs and cats, thus minimizing competition between them, avoiding agonistic behaviour, in particular where dogs and cats do not have ad libitum access to feed; (a)  provide equal access to all dogs and cats; Amendment 127
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 11 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a.  Where advised in writing by a veterinarian to do so, the operators may adjust the feeding and watering frequencies. The operators shall keep a record of the advice for its entire duration as advised by the veterinarian. Amendment 128
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 12 – paragraph 1 1.  Operators shall ensure that dogs and cats are provided with housing in accordance with point 2 of Annex I. 1.  Except of natural or legal person responsible for shelters, operators shall ensure that dogs and cats are provided with housing in accordance with point 2 of Annex I. Amendment 129
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 12 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2.  Operators and natural or legal persons responsible for shelters shall ensure that: 2.  Operators shall ensure that: Amendment 130
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point c (c)  where animals are kept in breeding establishments or pet shops, air circulation, dust levels, temperature, relative air humidity and gas concentrations are kept within limits which are not harmful to dogs and cats and that ventilation is sufficient to avoid overheating and, where necessary, in combination with heating systems, to remove excessive moisture; (c)  in breeding establishments and selling establishments where dogs and cats are kept indoors, temperature, relative air humidity and gas concentrations are not harmful to dogs or cats and that ventilation is sufficient to avoid overheating; Amendment 131
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point d (d)  dogs and cats have enough space to be able to move around freely and to express species-specific behaviour according to their needs, with sufficient space for enrichment material and structures, a possibility for animals to socialise and withdraw, and clean resting places; (d)  dogs and cats have enough space to be able to move around freely and to express species-specific behaviour according to their needs; Amendment 132
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 12 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 Keeping dogs or cats in containers shall be prohibited. Operators shall not keep dogs or cats in containers. Amendment 289
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 12 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 a (new) Keeping or selling dogs or cats in pet shops shall be prohibited. Amendment 133
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 12 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 Containers may only be used for the transport and temporary isolation of individual dogs and cats provided that stress due to extreme temperatures is avoided. By way of derogation, containers may only be used for the transport, short term isolation of individual dogs or cats and during the participation in shows, exhibitions and competitions, for puppies or kittens with reduced thermoregulation capacity or puppies or kittens together with their mothers, provided that stress is minimised and suffering is avoided and the dogs and cats are able to stand and lie down in a natural position. Amendment 134
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 12 – paragraph 4 4.  Keeping dogs exclusively indoors shall be prohibited. Dogs kept indoors shall have daily access to an outdoor area that allows exercise and socialisation. In addition, when dogs are kept in kennels, operators shall design and construct individual enclosures to allow dogs to have free access to a confined outdoor space and an indoor space or an individual hut. 4.  Keeping dogs exclusively indoors shall be prohibited. Dogs kept indoors shall have daily access to an outdoor area that allows exercise, exploration and socialisation. In addition, when dogs are kept in kennels, operators shall design and construct individual enclosures to allow dogs to have free access to a confined outdoor space and an indoor space or an individual hut. Amendment 135
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 12 – paragraph 6 a (new) 6a.  Operators of breeding and selling establishments shall use, where necessary, heating or cooling systems to maintain good air quality, an appropriate temperature in indoor enclosures at their establishments, and remove excessive moisture. Amendment 136
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 12 – paragraph 7 7.  Operators shall ensure that dogs and cats have access to natural light at all times. Where needed, due to the climatic conditions and geographic position of a Member State, operators shall provide artificial lighting. 7.  Operators shall ensure that dogs or cats are exposed to light, and are able to stay in the dark for sufficient and uninterrupted periods in order to maintain a normal circadian rhythm. For the purposes of the first subparagraph, ‘light’ means natural light, complemented, where needed, due to the climatic conditions and geographic position of a Member State, by artificial light. Amendment 137
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 12 – paragraph 8 8.  This Article applies from [5 years from the date of entry into force of this Regulation]. deleted Amendment 138
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 12 – paragraph 8 a (new) 8a.  Paragraph 4 shall not apply to breeding establishments where livestock guardian dogs are kept during the periods when such dogs are being trained for herding purposes. Amendment 139
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 13 – paragraph 1 1.  Operators shall ensure that measures are taken to safeguard the health of dogs and cats in accordance with point 3 of Annex 1. deleted Amendment 140
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 13 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2.  Operators and natural or legal persons responsible for shelters shall ensure that: 2.  Operators and caretakers shall ensure that: Amendment 141
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 13 – paragraph 2 – point a (a)  dogs and cats under their responsibility are inspected by animal caretakers at least once a day; (a)  dogs or cats under their responsibility are inspected by animal caretakers at least once a day and vulnerable dogs and cats, such as newborns, ill or injured dogs and cats, and peri-partum bitches and queens, are inspected more frequently; Amendment 142
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 13 – paragraph 2 – point b (b)  dogs or cats with signs of disease, sickness, injury or otherwise compromised welfare are transferred, where required, without undue delay to a separate area, are treated by a veterinarian, where appropriate, and kept there until they are fully recovered, or alternatively euthanised without undue delay; (b)  dogs or cats with signs of disease, sickness, injury or otherwise compromised welfare are transferred, where required, without undue delay to a separate area, are treated by a veterinarian, where appropriate, and kept there until they are fully recovered; Amendment 143
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 13 – paragraph 2 – point c (c)  the euthanasia of a dog or a cat is only performed by a veterinarian. (c)  where, in cases referred to in point (b), recovery is not achievable and the dogs or cats experience severe pain or suffering that cannot be alleviated and keeping them alive is contrary to the rules of their well-being euthanasia may be only carried out by a veterinarian and with the prior consent of the operator Amendment 144
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 13 – paragraph 2 – point d (d)  measures including veterinary medication are in place to prevent and control external and internal parasites, including preventive veterinary treatments to prevent common diseases to which dogs or cats are likely to be exposed with due regard to the epidemiological situation; (d)  measures are in place to prevent and control external and internal parasites, including preventive veterinary treatments such as vaccination, to prevent common diseases to which dogs or cats are likely to be exposed with due regard to the epidemiological situation; Amendment 145
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 13 – paragraph 2 – point e (e)  enrichment materials do not present any risk of injury or biological or chemical contamination or any other health risk. (e)  enrichment materials do not present any risk of biological or chemical contamination. Amendment 146
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 13 – paragraph 2 – point e a (new) (ea)  if available, relevant health related information shall be provided to the acquirer of a dog or a cat, including information on vaccination, allergies, health conditions and on responsible ownership in accordance with Article 8(1). Point (a) shall not apply to breeding establishments where livestock guardian dogs are kept during the periods when such dogs are used for herding or training purposes. Amendment 147
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 13 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a.   The euthanasia of a dog or a cat in animal shelters as a population management solution is prohibited. Amendment 148
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 13 – paragraph 2 – point e b (new) (eb)   health care for animals is aligned with a ‘One Health’ approach, such as the prudent use of antibiotics to avoid anti-microbial resistance (AMR). Amendment 149
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 13 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part Operators shall ensure that: Operators responsible for breeding establishments and their caretakers shall ensure that: Amendment 150
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 13 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point -a (new) (-a)  measures are taken to safeguard the health of dogs or cats in accordance with point 3 of Annex I; Amendment 151
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 13 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point a (a)  bitches and queens are only bred if they have a minimum age in accordance with Annex I points 3.1 and 3.2, their skeletal growth is completed, and they are free from disease or physical conditions which could negatively impact their pregnancy and welfare; (a)  bitches or queens are only bred if they have a minimum age in accordance with point 3 of Annex I, their skeletal growth is completed, and they have no diagnosed disease, clinical sign of diseases or physical conditions which could negatively impact their pregnancy and welfare; Amendment 152
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 13 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point b (b)  litter-giving pregnancies of bitches and queens follows a maximum frequency; (b)  litter-giving pregnancies of bitches or queens follows a maximum frequency in accordance with point 3 of Annex I; ; Amendment 153
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 13 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point d (d)  any bitch aged 8 years or more and any queen aged 6 years or more shall, before being used for breeding, undergo a physical examination by a veterinarian, to confirm in writing that her pregnancy will not pose any risk to her welfare, including her health. deleted Amendment 154
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 13 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point e (e)  adult female dogs and cats which are no longer used for reproduction, including as a result of the provisions of this Regulation, are not killed or abandoned. Operators shall continue to ensure the welfare of those animals in accordance with Regulation. (e)  dogs and cats which are no longer used for reproduction, including as a result of the provisions of this Regulation, are either kept or sold, donated or rehomed, not killed or abandoned. Amendment 155
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 13 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 The operator shall keep the written confirmation referred to in point (d) for a period of at least 3 years after the death of the bitch or the queen. deleted Amendment 156
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 13 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 a (new) When operators and natural or legal persons responsible for shelters possess results of health tests of a dog or a cat or genetic reports and diagnoses of sire or dam of the pet animal in question, they shall share this information with the animal´s acquirer. Amendment 157
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 13 – paragraph 4 4.  This Article shall apply from [5 years from the date of entry into force of this Regulation]. deleted Amendment 158
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 14 – paragraph 1 1.  Operators and natural or legal persons responsible for shelters shall ensure that measures are taken to meet the behavioural needs of cats and dogs in accordance with point 4 of Annex I. 1.  Operators shall ensure that measures are taken to meet the behavioural needs of cats or dogs in accordance with point 4 of Annex I. Amendment 159
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 14 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2.  Keeping dogs and cats in areas restraining their natural movements shall be prohibited, except for performing the following procedures or treatments: 2.  Keeping dogs and cats in areas restraining their natural movements shall be prohibited, except in case of Article 12(3), second subparagraph, and for performing the following procedures or treatments: Amendment 160
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 14 – paragraph 2 – point a (a)  physical examinations, including identification of the animals; (a)  physical examinations; Amendment 161
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 14 – paragraph 2 – point b (b)  marking animals for identification purposes; (b)  individual identification of dogs and cats and reading the identification information; Amendment 164
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 14 – paragraph 3 3.  Tethering within the premises of the establishment for more than 1 hour shall be prohibited, except for the duration of a medical treatment. 3.  Tethering shall be prohibited, except for the duration of a medical treatment. Amendment 165
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 14 – paragraph 5 a (new) 5a.  Operators shall ensure that enrichment is provided and accessible to all dogs or cats, creating a stimulating environment, enabling species-specific behaviour and reducing their frustration. Amendment 166
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 14 – paragraph 5 b (new) 5b.  Member States may grant derogations from paragraph 3 for dogs intended for use in military, police and customs services that are kept in breeding or selling establishments. Amendment 167
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 15 – paragraph 1 1.  Mutilations, including ear cropping, tail docking, partial or complete digit amputation, and resection of vocal cords or folds, shall be prohibited unless they are performed due to a medical indication with the sole purpose of improving the health of dogs and cats. In such case, the procedure shall only be performed by a veterinarian under anaesthesia and prolonged analgesia. 1.  Mutilations, including ear cropping, tail docking, claw removal or other partial or complete digit amputation, and resection of vocal cords or folds, shall be prohibited unless they are performed upon medical indication, which may include prophylactic, diagnostic, and/or treatment reasons, with the sole purpose of , preserving, improving the health of dogs or cats or preventing injury. In such case, the procedure shall only be performed by a veterinarian under anaesthesia and prolonged analgesia. Amendment 168
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 15 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a.  The medical indication for the mutilation and details of procedure to be carried out, shall be documented by a veterinarian. This document shall be retained by the operator until the dog or cat, along with this document, are transferred to another establishment or owner. The operator of the establishment responsible for the dog or cat when the mutilation was performed by the veterinarian shall retain a copy of the document for three years. By way of derogation, Member States may allow ear cropping by notching or tipping cat ears in the context of marking stray cats when neutered under trap-neuter programmes. Amendment 169
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 15 – paragraph 2 2.  Male and female neutering shall be permitted only if performed by a veterinarian under anaesthesia and prolonged analgesia. 2.  Operators shall ensure that neutering is only performed under anesthesia and prolongued analgesia by a veterinarian. Veterinarians may consider non-surgical sterilisation to neutering, whenever appropriate. Amendment 170
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 15 – paragraph 3 – introductory part 3.  The following handling practices shall be prohibited: 3.  The following handling practices that cause pain or suffering shall be prohibited: Amendment 171
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 15 – paragraph 3 – point d (d)  prolonged use of muzzles, unless required for health or welfare reasons, in which case the duration shall be limited to the minimum period necessary. (d)  prolonged using of muzzles, unless required for health or welfare reasons, in which case the duration shall be limited to the minimum period necessary. Amendment 172
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 15 – paragraph 3 – point e (e)  lifting dogs or cats by the limbs, the head, the tail and the hair. (e)  lifting dogs or cats by the limbs, the head, the tail, ears, skin or the hair. Amendment 173
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 15 – paragraph 3 – point e a (new) (ea)  using prong collars; Amendment 174
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 15 – paragraph 3 – point e b (new) (eb)  using choke collars without safety top; Amendment 175
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 15 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a.  Member States may grant derogations from paragraph 3 for dogs intended for use in military, police or customs services. Amendment 176
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 15 a (new) Article 15a Aesthetic shows, exhibitions and competitions 1.  Operators of breeding or selling establishments shall not use in aesthetic shows, exhibitions and competitions of dogs and cats, dogs or cats with excessive conformational traits or dogs or cats which have been mutilated in such a way that results in an alteration of physical characteristics. 2.  Organisers of aesthetic shows, exhibitions and competitions of dogs and cats shall exclude from such shows, exhibitions and competitions dogs and cats which have excessive conformational traits or dogs or cats which have been mutilated in such a way that results in an alteration of physical characteristics. Amendment 177
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 17 – paragraph 1 1.  From [3 years from the date of entry into force], all dogs and cats kept in establishments for supply in the Union, including adult dogs and cats kept in breeding establishments, dogs and cats kept in shelters, and dogs and cats supplied by natural persons, shall be marked for identification by means of a subcutaneous transponder containing a microchip, in accordance with Annex II. Operators of establishments shall ensure that dogs and cats born in their establishments are marked for identification by the date of their supply in the Union or at the latest within 3 months after the birth of the animal. The implantation of the transponder shall be performed by a veterinarian or under the responsibility of a veterinarian. 1.  All dogs and cats kept in establishments and all dogs and cats placed on the market shall be individually identified by means of a subcutaneous transponder containing a microchip, in accordance with Annex II. The implantation of the transponder shall be performed by a veterinarian or under the responsibility of a veterinarian. Where a veterinarian considers that the implantation of a microchip could significantly compromise the dog’s or cat’s health, he/she may delay the microchip implantation temporarily until the animal’s health concerns can be suitably addressed. In case a dog or a cat is experiencing significant adverse reactions after the implantation of the microchip, the veterinary shall take all the necessary actions to ensure the dog’s or cat’s health, including removal of the microchip. Amendment 178
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 17 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a.  Operators of establishments shall ensure that dogs and cats born in their establishments are individually identified within 3 months after their birth and in any event before the date of their placing on the market. Amendment 179
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 17 – paragraph 1 b (new) 1b.  Operators of selling establishments, shelters, and those responsible for unwanted, abandoned, stray, lost or confiscated dogs and cats that enter their establishments or come under their responsibility shall ensure that dogs and cats are individually identified within 30 days after their arrival at the establishment and in any event before the date of their placing on the market. Amendment 180
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 17 – paragraph 1 c (new) 1c.  Natural or legal persons, other than operators, placing dogs or cats on the market shall ensure that they are individually identified before the date of their placing on the market. Amendment 181
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 17 – paragraph 1 d (new) 1d.  Dogs and cats which have been individually identified by means of an injectable transponder containing a microchip, in accordance with Union or national law before [the date of application of this Regulation], shall be considered compliant with the requirements in this paragraph, provided that the microchip is readable. Amendment 313
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 17 – paragraph 1 e (new) 1e.   From … [5 years from the date of entry into force of this Regulation], all dogs kept shall be individually identified in accordance with paragraph 1. From … [10 years from the date of entry into force of this Regulation], all cats kept shall be individually identified in accordance with paragraph 1. Amendment 182
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 17 – paragraph 2 2.  From [3 years from the date of entry into force], dogs and cats identified in accordance with paragraph 1 shall be registered by the veterinarian, or an assistant under the responsibility of the veterinarian, in a national database referred to in Article 19. For dogs and cats kept in breeding establishments, the registration shall be made in the name of the owner of the breeding establishment responsible for the dog or the cat. For dogs and cats kept in shelters , the registration shall be made in the name of the person responsible of the shelter. For natural persons intending to supply a dog or a cat in the Union, the registration shall be made in the name of that person. Any subsequent owner of, or responsible for, the dog or the cat, shall ensure that the change of ownership or responsibility is recorded in the database referred to in Article 19. 2.  Within two working days after their identification, in accordance with paragraph 1, the dogs and cats shall be registered by the veterinarian, in a national database referred to in Article 19. Member States may allow the registration by other persons than veterinarians, provided that they have measures in place to ensure the accuracy of information inserted in the database. For dogs and cats kept in establishments, the registration shall be made in the name of the operator of the establishment responsible for the dog or the cat. For natural persons placing a dog or a cat on the market, the registration shall be made in the name of that person. In case of transfer of ownership or responsibility, the natural or legal person placing, the dog or the cat on the market, shall ensure that any change of ownership or responsibility is recorded in the database referred to in Article 19, within two weeks from the date of change of ownership or responsibility, in accordance with the conditions laid down by the Member State responsible. Amendment 183
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 17 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a.  In the case of a death of a dog or a cat kept in an establishment, the operator shall ensure that the death is recorded in the database referred to in Article 19, in accordance with the conditions laid down by the Member State responsible for that database. Amendment 184
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 17 – paragraph 2 b (new) 2b.  Member States may grant derogations from paragraph 2 and 2a for military, police and customs dogs that are kept in establishments. Amendment 185
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 17 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part From [3 years from the date of entry into force], before supplying a dog or a cat in the Union, the supplier shall provide to the acquirer of the animal: Before placing a dog or a cat on the market the operators or natural or legal persons placing the dog or cat on the market shall provide to the acquirer of the animal: Amendment 186
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 17 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point a (a)  proof of the identification and registration of the animal in compliance with paragraphs 1 and 2; (a)  proof of the identification and registration of dog or cat in compliance with paragraphs 1 and 2 and a weblink to the system referred to in paragraph 6; Amendment 187
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 17 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 Acquirers shall be able to verify the authenticity of the identification and registration of animals supplied through the system referred to in paragraph 7. Acquirers shall be able to verify the authenticity of the identification and registration of dogs or cats placed on the market through the system referred to in paragraph 7. Amendment 188
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 17 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 From [5 years from the date of entry into force], providers of online platforms shall ensure that their online interface is designed and organised in such a way that allows the suppliers of dogs and cats to comply with their obligations under paragraph 3, in line with Article 31 of Regulation (EU) 2022/2065, and shall inform acquirers, in a visible manner, of the possibility to verify the identification and registration of the animal through a weblink to the system referred to in paragraph 6. Providers of online platforms shall ensure that their online interface is designed and organised in such a way that facilitates the operators or other natural or legal persons placing dogs or cats on the market to comply with their obligations under paragraph 3, and Article 8 paragraph 2 in line with Article 31 of Regulation (EU) 2022/2065, and shall inform acquirers, in a visible manner, of the possibility to verify the identification and registration of the dog or cat through a weblink to the system referred to in paragraph 6. Amendment 189
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 17 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 The supplier of dogs and cats shall be the sole responsible for the accuracy of the information provided through the interface of the online platform. Nothing in this paragraph shall be construed as imposing a general monitoring obligation on the provider of the online platform within the meaning of Article 8 of Regulation (EU) 2022/2065. The natural or legal person placing dogs or cats on the market shall be the solely responsible for the accuracy of the information provided through the interface of the online platform. Nothing in this paragraph shall be construed as imposing a general monitoring obligation on the provider of the online platform within the meaning of Article 8 of Regulation (EU) 2022/2065. Amendment 190
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 17 – paragraph 5 5.  The Commission shall adopt implementing acts specifying the information to be provided by suppliers as proof of identification and registration of the animal in accordance with paragraph 3(a), both in cases where the dogs and cats are offered through online platforms and by other means. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 24. deleted Amendment 191
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 17 – paragraph 6 – introductory part 6.  From [3 years from the date of entry into force], the Commission shall ensure that a system performing automated checks of the authenticity of the identification and registration of dogs or cats supplied, using the database referred to in Article 19, is publicly available free of charge . The Commission may entrust the development, maintenance and operation of this system to an independent entity. The system shall meet the following criteria: 6.  The Commission shall ensure that an online system performing automated checks of the authenticity of the identification and registration of dogs or cats placed on the market, using the database referred to in Article 19, is publicly available free of charge . The Commission may entrust the development, maintenance and operation of this system to an independent entity following a public selection process, pursuant to the relevant provisions of Title VII of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046. The system shall meet the following criteria: Amendment 192
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 17 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part By the [3 years from the date of entry into force], the Commission shall adopt implementing acts specifying the following aspects of the system referred to in paragraph 6: The Commission shall adopt implementing acts laying down: Amendment 193
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 17 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1 – point a (new) (a)  based on the content of the databases referred to in Article 19(3), point a, the exact information to be provided by natural and legal persons placing dogs or cats on the market, as proof of identification and registration of the dogs and cats in accordance with point (a) of paragraph 3, both in cases where the dogs and cats are offered through online platforms and by other means; Amendment 194
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 17 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1 – point a – indent 2 a (new) –   the categories of personal data that are made available to the verifying person during the verification of the identification and registration, that shall be limited to those strictly needed to enable such verification. Amendment 195
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 17 – paragraph 7 – – subparagraph 1 – point b (new) (b)  the following aspects of the system referred to in paragraph 6: —  the key functionalities of the system; Amendment 196
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 17 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1 a(new) The implementing acts referred to in point (a) shall be adopted by [the date of application of this Regulation] and the implementing act referred to in point (b) shall be adopted by [3 years from date of entry into force of this Regulation] Amendment 197
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 18 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new) (aa)   ensuring that veterinarians and other relevant professionals receive training on best practices in animal welfare, including on the detection and reporting of welfare violations including painful practices as set out in Article 15, in line with One Health principles. Amendment 198
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 18 – paragraph 1 – point a b (new) (ab)   ensuring that operators, natural or legal persons responsible for shelters, foster homes and pounds, animal caretakers and veterinarians receive adequate and regular training and certificates for the completion of the training courses referred to in point (a); Amendment 199
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 18 – paragraph 1 – point a c (new) (ac)  ensuring that shelter medicine courses, including those with a focus on herd health, are available for veterinarians; Amendment 200
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 18 – paragraph 1 – point a d (new) (ad)   ensuring that trainers and handlers of dogs intended for military, police and customs services receive regular training within and preferably across Member States in order to improve their skills especially on operant conditioning and positive reinforcement, on behavioural science and welfare principles, and on stress management for both dogs and handlers; Amendment 201
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 18 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new) (ba)   facilitating collaboration between competent authorities, veterinary associations, and educational institutions to develop and promote high-quality, long term science-based training programmes for animal caretakers and veterinary professionals, increasing the cooperation between relevant agencies and the synergies between the information campaigns. Amendment 202
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 18 a (new) Article 18a National information campaigns on the protection of stray animals and legislation concerning the protection of stray animals 1.  Member States are encouraged to initiate and implement national information campaigns on current legislation concerning the protection and welfare of dogs and cats. These campaigns must be aimed both at animal owners and at the general public, in order to raise awareness about the legal obligations and best practices in caring for animals. 2.  Information campaigns may be conducted by the competent authorities in collaboration with animal protection organisations, veterinarians and other relevant entities. The information communicated shall include: (a)  the legal obligations of keepers of pet animals; (b)  the responsibilities and actions of local authorities in managing strays, as well as the actions that they are to take to prevent abandonment; (c)  the steps to be taken if a person finds a lost or abandoned animal, including contacting veterinary services, animal shelters or the local police; (d)  a statement of the importance of responsible adoption and neutering to reduce the stray animal population. 3.  Member States may provide national or regional funding for these campaigns and may encourage the participation of mass media and educational establishments with a view to disseminating the information further. 4.  The Commission shall encourage the exchange of best practices between Member States. Amendment 203
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 18 b (new) Article 18b Measures to prevent abandonment and promote the neutering of dogs and cats 1.  Member States shall be encouraged to adopt concrete measures to prevent the abandonment of dogs and cats, including through public education, by raising awareness about responsible ownership and through the effective enforcement of existing legislation. 2.  To reduce the number of strays, Member States shall be encouraged to identify and use national and private sources of funding for: (a)  free or subsidised neutering campaigns for stray dogs and cats and for pet animals belonging to low-income people or animal protection organisations; (b)  programmes for the registration and identification of pet animals, including by means of microchipping, to facilitate adoption and the return of lost animals to their owners and prevent abandonment; (c)  actions to raise awareness among and educate the population about the responsibility of keeping a pet animal and the negative effects of abandonment on animal welfare and on communities. 3.  Member States may work with non-governmental organisations, veterinary clinics and local authorities to implement the measures referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 and for the purpose of facilitating access to neutering and identification programmes. Amendment 204
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 19 – paragraph 1 1.  From [3 years from the date of entry into force of this Regulation], competent authorities shall establish and maintain a database for the registration of microchipped dogs and cats. 1.  The competent authorities shall establish and maintain databases for dogs and cats identified and registered in accordance with Article 17 and Article 21(4) Amendment 205
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 19 – paragraph 2 2.  From [5 years from date of entry into force of this Regulation], Member States shall ensure that their databases as referred to in paragraph 1 are interoperable with the same databases of other Member States so that the identification of a dog or a cat can be authenticated and traced across the Union. 2.  Member States shall ensure that their databases as referred to in paragraph 1 comply with the requirements laid down by the implementing act referred to in point (b) of paragraph 3 to ensure their interoperability so that the identification of a dog or a cat can be authenticated and traced across the Union. Amendment 206
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 19 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a.  The Commission shall establish and maintain an index database containing the identification numbers of the microchips of the dogs and cats and the national databases where the identification details are stored, without accessing personal data. The Commission may entrust the development, maintenance and operation of this index database to an independent entity, following a public selection process, pursuant to the relevant provisions of [ Title VII of the Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509. Amendment 316
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 19 – paragraph 2 b (new) 2b.   The Commission and the competent authorities of Member States shall co-operate to establish and maintain a publicly accessible database of animal shelter establishments across the Union, ensuring transparency and accountability in the adherence to animal welfare law. Amendment 207
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 19 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point b (b)  their interoperability between Member States; (b)  the interoperability between Member States databases and the index database; Amendment 208
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 19 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point f a (new) (fa)  The interconnection between the Member States databases referred to in paragraph 1 and any other relevant database, including the Information Management System for Official Controls (IMSOC). Amendment 209
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 20 a (new) Article 20a National information campaigns concerning stray animal legislation and protection 1.  The Member States are encouraged, in collaboration with the competent authorities, to initiate and implement national information campaigns concerning existing legislation on the protection and welfare of dogs and cats. These campaigns should be targeted at both animal owners and the general public in order to raise awareness of legal obligations and good practices in relation to animal care. 2.  Information campaigns can be run by the competent authorities in collaboration with animal protection organisations, veterinarians and other relevant entities. The information provided must include: (a)  The legal obligations of pet owners; (b)  The responsibilities and actions of local authorities in managing stray animals, and actions to prevent abandonment; (c)  Recommended steps if a person finds a lost or abandoned animal, including contacting veterinary services, animal shelters or the local police; (d)  The importance of responsible adoption and neutering to reduce the population of stray animals. 3.  The Member States can provide national or regional funding for these campaigns and can encourage the mass media and educational institutions to participate with a view to better dissemination of information. 4.  The European Commission shall encourage the sharing of good practices between the Member States. Amendment 210
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 20 b (new) Article 20b Measures to prevent abandonment and promote the neutering of dogs and cats 1.  The Member States are encouraged, in collaboration with the competent authorities, to adopt concrete measures to prevent abandonment of dogs and cats, including by educating the public, making owners responsible and enforcing existing legislation effectively. 2.  To reduce the number of stray animals, the Member States are encouraged to identify and use national and private financing sources for: (a)  Free or subsidised neutering campaigns for stray dogs and cats and pets of persons on low incomes or animal protection organisations; (b)  Programmes to register and identify pets, including by microchipping, to facilitate adoption and the return of lost animals to owners and to prevent abandonment; (c)  Actions to raise awareness and educate the public with regard to the responsibility of owning a pet and the adverse effects of abandonment on animal welfare and the community. 3.  The Member States can work together with non-governmental organisations, veterinary clinics and local authorities to implement these measures and facilitate public access to neutering and identification programmes. Amendment 211
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 20 c (new) Article 20c Data protection 1.  The competent authorities of the Member States shall be controllers within the meaning of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 in relation to the processing of personal data collected under Article 7, Article 7a and Article 19(1) of this Regulation. The Commission shall be a controller within the meaning of Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 in relation to the processing of personal data collected under Article 17(6) and the second subparagraph of Article 21(4) of this Regulation. It shall be prohibited for any person having access to the personal data referred to in the first and second sub-paragraphs to divulge any personal data, the knowledge of which was acquired in the exercise of their duties or otherwise incidentally to such exercise. Member States and the Commission shall take all appropriate measures to address infringements of that prohibition. The personal data collected under the first and second sub-paragraphs shall not be used for other purposes than official control of the compliance with the welfare and traceability requirements under this regulation and detection of fraudulent practices with a view to the adoption of control measures. 2.  That personal data referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article shall be retained for the following periods: (a)  in the case of Article 7 and Article 7a, 10 years after the date of cessation of the activity of the establishment; (b)  in the case of Article 19(1), 20 years after the first registration of the dog or cat in the database referred to in that Article or 5 years after the recording of the death of the dog or cat in that database; (c)  in the case of the second subparagraph of Article 21(4a), 5 years after the date of pre-notification. Amendment 212
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 21 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1.  From [5 years from the date of entry into force of this Regulation], dogs and cats may only be entered into the Union for placing on the Union market if they have been kept in compliance with any of the following: 1.  Dogs and cats may only be entered into the Union for placing on the market provided that the following conditions are met: Amendment 213
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 21 – paragraph 1 – point a (a)  Chapters II of this Regulation; (a)  they have been breed and kept in compliance with any of the following: Amendment 214
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 21 – paragraph 1 – point a – point i (new) (i)  Chapter II of this Regulation; Amendment 215
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 21 – paragraph 1 – point b (b)   conditions recognised by the Union to be equivalent to those set out by this Regulation; or (ii)  conditions recognised by the Union in accordance with Article 129 of Regulation (EU) 2017/625 to be equivalent to those set out by Chapter II of this Regulation; or Amendment 216
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 21 – paragraph 1 – point c (c)  where applicable, requirements contained in a specific agreement between the Union and the exporting country (iii)  where applicable, requirements contained in a specific agreement between the Union and the exporting country. Amendment 217
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 21 – paragraph 2 2.   From [5 years from date of entry into force of this Regulation], dogs and cats may only be entered into the Union for placing on the market or supply provided that they come from a third country or territory and an establishment listed in accordance with Articles 126 and 127 of Regulation (EU) 2017/625. (b)   they come from a third country or territory and an establishment listed in accordance with Articles 126 and 127 of Regulation (EU) 2017/625. Amendment 218
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 21 – paragraph 3 3.   From [date of entry into force of this Regulation + 5 years], the official certificate accompanying dogs and cats entering into the Union from third countries and territories shall contain an attestation certifying compliance with paragraphs 1 and confirming that the dogs and cats originate from an establishment listed in accordance with paragraph 2. 2.  The official certificate referred to in Article 126(2)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/625 accompanying dogs and cats entering into the Union from third countries and territories to be placed on the Union market, shall contain an attestation certifying compliance with paragraph 1 of this Article. Amendment 219
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 21 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 4.  Without prejudice to Article 10(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 576/2013 and Article 74(1) of Regulation (EU) 2020/69211 , dogs and cats entering into the Union shall be identified with a microchip as referred to in Article 17(1) and allowing for traceability. 3.  Without prejudice to Article 10(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 576/2013 and Article 74(1) of Regulation (EU) 2020/69211 , dogs and cats entering into the Union to be placed on the Union market, shall be identified before their entry by a veterinarian with a microchip. compliant with Annex II . The importer shall ensure the registration of dogs and cats by a veterinarian into a national database, referred to in Article 19 within two working days after their entry into the Union. Member States may allow the registration by other persons than veterinarians, provided that they have measures in place to ensure the accuracy of information inserted in the database. __________________ __________________ 11 Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/692 of 30 January 2020 supplementing Regulation (EU) 2016/429 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards rules for entry into the Union, and the movement and handling after entry of consignments of certain animals, germinal products and products of animal origin, OJ L 174, 3.6.2020, p. 379. 11 Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/692 of 30 January 2020 supplementing Regulation (EU) 2016/429 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards rules for entry into the Union, and the movement and handling after entry of consignments of certain animals, germinal products and products of animal origin, OJ L 174, 3.6.2020, p. 379. Amendment 306
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 21 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 In case the dogs or cats entering into the Union are not yet registered in a Member State database as referred to in Article 19(1), once they arrive at their place of destination, the owner or person responsible for the animal shall ensure their registration into one of the Member States databases within 48 hours of arrival. In case the dogs or cats entering into the Union are not yet registered in a Member State database as referred to in Article 19(1), they shall be registered in the database of the Member State of entry by a veterinarian at the Union border. The registration shall be made in the name of the owner or person responsible for the animal and it shall record the establishment of origin listed in accordance with paragraph 2. Member States may allow the registration by persons other than veterinarians, provided that they have measures in place to ensure the accuracy of information inserted in the database. Amendment 221
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 21 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4a.  The entry of dogs and cats into the Union under a non-commercial movement, as defined in point 14 of Article 4 of Regulation (EU) 2016/429, shall be pre-notified by their owners into an online Union pet travellers’ database at least five working days before the crossing of the Union border, except in the following cases: (a)  dogs or cats entering into the Union directly from third countries listed in accordance with Article 13(1) of Regulation (EU) No 576/2013; (b)  dogs or cats registered in a Member State database referred to in Article 19(1). The owner shall pre-notify the identity of the dog or cat and where relevant the identity of the authorised person travelling with that dog or cat, the identification number of the microchip of the dog or cat, its main destination in the Union, and where relevant the planned date and place of exit from the Union. Where the dog or cat stays more than four months in the Union, the owner shall ensure its registration in the database of the Member State of residence within five working days after the expiry of that fourth month. The Commission shall establish and maintain the Union pet travellers’ database referred to in the second subparagraph, and may entrust the development, maintenance and operation of this database to an independent entity, following a public selection process, pursuant to the relevant provisions of Title VII of the Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046. Access to this database shall be restricted to Member States’ competent authorities. Amendment 222
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 21 – paragraph 5 5.  The Commission is empowered, by means of implementing acts, to establish a procedure for the recognition by the Union of equivalent conditions under point paragraph 1 point (b). Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 24. deleted Amendment 223
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 22 – paragraph 1 – introductory part The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 23 amending the Annexes to this Regulation to take into account of scientific and technical progress, including, when relevant, scientific opinions of EFSA, and of social, economic and environmental impacts, as regards: The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 23 amending the Annexes to this Regulation to take into account of scientific and technical progress, including, when relevant, scientific opinions of the European Food Safety Authority, and of social, economic, and environmental impacts, as regards: Amendment 224
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 22 – paragraph 1 – point a (a)  feeding frequencies and weaning process; (a)  watering and feeding requirements and weaning process; Amendment 225
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 22 – paragraph 1 – point c (c)  lighting parameters; (c)  lighting requirements; Amendment 226
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 22 – paragraph 1 – point h (h)  minimum age of bitches and queens for onset of breeding; (h)  minimum and maximum age of bitches and queens for breeding; Amendment 227
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 22 – paragraph 1 – point j (j)  requirements for transponders used to mark dogs and cats; (j)  requirements for transponders used to individually identify dogs and cats; Amendment 228
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 23 – paragraph 2 2.  The power to adopt delegated acts referred to in Article 6(4), Article 10(2) and Article 22 shall be conferred on the Commission for an indeterminate period of time from [the date of entry into force of this Regulation]. 2.  The power to adopt delegated acts referred to in Article 6(2b), Article 6a(3) and Article 22 shall be conferred on the Commission for an indeterminate period of time from [the date of entry into force of this Regulation]. Amendment 229
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 23 – paragraph 3 3.  The delegation of power referred to in Article 6(4), Article 10(2) and Article 22 may be revoked at any time by the European Parliament or by the Council. A decision to revoke shall put an end to the delegation of the power specified in that decision. It shall take effect the day following the publication of the decision in the Official Journal of the European Union or at a later date specified therein. It shall not affect the validity of any delegated acts already in force. 3.  The delegation of power referred to in Article 6(2b), Article 6a(3) and Article 22 may be revoked at any time by the European Parliament or by the Council. A decision to revoke shall put an end to the delegation of the power specified in that decision. It shall take effect the day following the publication of the decision in the Official Journal of the European Union or at a later date specified therein. It shall not affect the validity of any delegated acts already in force. Amendment 230
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 23 – paragraph 6 6.  A delegated act adopted pursuant to Article 6(4), Article 10(2) and Article 22 shall enter into force only if no objection has been expressed either by the European Parliament or by the Council within a period of two months of notification of that act to the European Parliament and the Council or if, before the expiry of that period, the European Parliament and the Council have both informed the Commission that they will not object. That period shall be extended by two months at the initiative of the European Parliament or of the Council. 6.  A delegated act adopted pursuant to Article 6(2b), Article 6a(3) and Article 22 shall enter into force only if no objection has been expressed either by the European Parliament or by the Council within a period of two months of notification of that act to the European Parliament and the Council or if, before the expiry of that period, the European Parliament and the Council have both informed the Commission that they will not object. That period shall be extended by two months at the initiative of the European Parliament or of the Council. Amendment 231
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 25 – paragraph 1 1.  This Regulation shall not prevent Member States from maintaining any stricter national rules aimed at a more extensive protection of the welfare of dogs and cats and in force at the time of entry into force of this Regulation, provided that those rules are not inconsistent with this Regulation and do not interfere with the proper functioning of the internal market. Before [the date of application of this Regulation], Member States shall inform the Commission about such national rules. The Commission shall bring them to the attention of the other Member States. 1.  This Regulation shall not prevent Member States from maintaining or adopting any stricter national rules aimed at a more extensive protection of the welfare of dogs and cats, and to their traceability, provided that those rules are not inconsistent with this Regulation and do not interfere with the proper functioning of the internal market. Member States shall inform the Commission about such national rules. The Commission shall bring them to the attention of the other Member States. Amendment 232
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 25 – paragraph 2 2.  This Regulation shall not prevent Member States from adopting stricter national measures aimed at ensuring more extensive protection of the welfare of dogs and cats kept in establishments within the territory of a Member State on the following animal welfare issues: deleted (a)  housing conditions; (b)  mutilations; (c)  enrichment; (d)  selection and breeding programmes, including minimum and maximum age for breeding. Member States shall inform the Commission about such national rules before their adoption. The Commission shall bring them to the attention of the other Member States. Amendment 233
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 25 – paragraph 3 3.  The measures referred to in paragraph 2 shall only be allowed provided that they are not inconsistent with this Regulation and do not interfere with the proper functioning of the internal market. deleted Amendment 234
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 25 – paragraph 4 4.  Member States shall not prohibit or impede the placing on the market within their territory of dogs and cats kept in another Member State on the grounds that the dogs and cats concerned have not been kept in accordance with its stricter national rules on animal welfare. 4.  Member States that have stricter national rules referred to in paragraph 1 shall not prohibit or impede the placing on the market within their territory of dogs and cats kept in another Member State on the grounds that the dogs and cats concerned have not been kept in accordance with its stricter national rules on animal welfare. Amendment 235
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 26 – paragraph 1 1.  On the basis of the reports received in accordance with Article 20 and additional relevant information, the Commission shall publish, by [7 years after the date of entry into force of this Regulation] and thereafter every 5 years, a monitoring report on the welfare of dogs and cats placed on the market in the Union. 1.  On the basis of the reports received in accordance with Article 20 and additional relevant information, the Commission shall publish, by [7 years after the date of entry into force of this Regulation] and thereafter every 5 years, a monitoring report on the welfare of dogs and cats placed on the market in the Union. The monitoring report shall assess the effectiveness, efficiency, relevance, coherence, socio-economic impact and EU added value of this Regulation in achieving its objectives. In particular, the Commission shall assess: Amendment 236
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 26 – paragraph 1 – point a (new) (a)  the extent to which this Regulation has contributed to ensuring a high level of welfare for dogs and cats, improving traceability, reducing illegal trade, and addressing the problems associated with inhumane breeding practices, including so-called puppy and kitten mills; Amendment 237
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 26 – paragraph 1 – point b (new) (b)  whether the scope of this Regulation remains fit for purpose, taking into account market developments, scientific and technological progress, and animal welfare considerations; and whether the current exceptions remain appropriate and sufficient in light of these developments; Amendment 238
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 26 – paragraph 1 – point c (new) (c)  whether scientific and technological progress has occurred, including development of new means of identification, taking into account their technical reliability, cost-effectiveness and invasiveness for the animal; Amendment 239
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 26 – paragraph 1 – point d (new) (d)  the impact of this Regulation on breeders, shelters, foster homes, and other operators, including the administrative burden and compliance costs; Amendment 240
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 26 – paragraph 1 – point e (new) (e)  the level of enforcement and compliance achieved by Member States, and the effectiveness of the cooperation between competent authorities, including data exchange and traceability mechanisms, Amendment 241
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 26 – paragraph 1 – point f (new) (f)  the feasibility, costs and benefits of introducing a digital passport for dogs and cats which could contain information on the identification, vaccination status and medical history of the animal. Amendment 242
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 26 – paragraph 1 – point g (new) (g)  the feasibility, impact and proportionality of extending mandatory identification and registration to all dogs and cats, including those kept by private owners, Amendment 243
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 26 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a.  By … [2 years from the date of entry into force of this Regulation], the Commission shall assess the possibility of registering dogs and cats, in accordance with Article 21(3), upon their entry into the Union, and shall present a report on its main findings to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Amendment 244
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 26 – paragraph 2 2.  By [15 years from the date of entry into force of this Regulation], the Commission shall carry out an evaluation of this Regulation, including an assessment of a possible maximum age for breeding of dogs and cats, and present a report on the main findings to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee, and the Committee of the Regions. 2.  By [12 years from the date of entry into force of this Regulation], the Commission shall carry out an evaluation of this Regulation, including an assessment of a possible maximum age for breeding of dogs and cats, and present a report on the main findings to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee, and the Committee of the Regions. Amendment 301
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 26 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a.   By … [5 years after the date of entry into force of this Regulation], the Commission shall: (a)  carry out an evaluation and a review of this Regulation, including an assessment of a possible maximum age for the breeding of dogs and cats; (b)  carry out an assessment of the situation of stray animals; (c)  establish a list of animal species allowed to be kept and placed on the market, where a prior impact assessment has shown its added value and feasibility; (d)  assess the potential extension of the scope of this Regulation to include other animals by amending this Regulation; (e)  assess the possibility of using alternative means of identification which are less invasive than the implantation of a transponder; and (f)  present a report on the main findings of points (a) to (e) to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee, and the Committee of the Regions. Amendment 245
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 27 – paragraph 1 Member States shall lay down the rules on penalties applicable to infringements of this Regulation and shall take all measures necessary to ensure that they are implemented. The penalties provided for shall be effective, proportionate and dissuasive. Member States shall lay down the rules on penalties applicable to infringements of this Regulation, as well as those resulting from the abandonment of pets, and shall take all measures necessary to ensure that they are implemented. The penalties provided for shall be effective, proportionate and dissuasive. Amendment 246
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 27 – paragraph 1 a (new) Member States shall ensure that the level of the financial penalties imposed for violations of this Regulation and of the rules referred to in Article 2(1), involving fraud or deception, reflects, in accordance with national law, at least the economic advantage for the operator, or, where appropriate, a percentage of the operator´s turnover and is high enough to have a deterrent effect. In cases where the infringements of the requirements of this Regulation are serious and repeated, Member States shall ensure that the penalties include a prohibition on working with and owning animals. Amendment 279
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 27 – paragraph 2 a (new) Considering the administrative burden of animal shelters and organisations responsible for the management of populations of stray dogs and cats in addition to the existing economic constraints, Member States may explore the capabilities of streamlining resources recovered from infringements of this Regulation to support and cover the administrative and operational costs of shelters and organisations responsible for the management of stray populations of dogs or cats. Amendment 247
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 28 – paragraph 2 It shall apply from [2 years from the date of entry into force of this Regulation], unless otherwise provided for in this Regulation. It shall apply from [2 years from the date of entry into force of this Regulation], except: (i)  Article 13 from 5 years from the date of entry into force of this Regulation; (ii)  Article 9(2) and Article 19(1) from 3 years from the date of entry into force of this Regulation; (iii)  Article 12, Article 17(4) and (6), Article 19(2) and (2a), and Article 21(1) to (4a) from 5 years from the date of entry into force of this Regulation; (iv)  Article 7a from 6 years from the date of entry into force of this Regulation; and (v)  Article 17(1) to (3) – in relation to dogs from 3 years from the date of entry into force of this Regulation – in relation to cats 7 years from the date of entry into force of this Regulation.. Amendment 248
    Proposal for a regulation
    Annex I – point 1 – introductory part 1.  Feeding 1.  Feeding and watering Amendment 249
    Proposal for a regulation
    Annex I – point 1 – point 1.1 – introductory part 1.1.  The operator shall implement the following feeding frequencies: 1.1.  Dogs and cats shall be fed at least twice per day. Puppies and kittens shall be fed more frequently. These requirements shall not apply to breeding establishments where livestock guardian dogs are kept during the periods when such dogs are used for herding purposes. Amendment 250
    Proposal for a regulation
    Annex I – point 1 – point 1.1 – point a (a)  adult cats and dogs shall be fed twice a day; deleted Amendment 252
    Proposal for a regulation
    Annex I – point 1 – point 1.1 – point c (c)  puppies under 8 weeks of age shall be fed at least 5 times a day; deleted Amendment 253
    Proposal for a regulation
    Annex I – point 1 – point 1.1 – point d (d)  kittens under 12 weeks of age shall be fed at least 4 times a day. deleted Amendment 254
    Proposal for a regulation
    Annex I – point 1 – point 1.2 1.2.  Every new-born puppy or kitten shall be fed with colostrum from their bitch or queen in the first two days of their lives. 1.2.  Each puppy or kitten shall be fed with colostrum during at least the first two days of its life and thereafter with milk from its mother or a lactating bitch or queen. If this is not possible, because is ill or is otherwise unable to feed her offspring or not sufficient, the puppy or kitten shall be fed with a milk replacer designed for puppies and kittens with such feeding frequency as instructed by the producer of the replacer or by a veterinarian. Amendment 255
    Proposal for a regulation
    Annex I – point 1 – point 1.3 1.3.  If the bitch or the queen is ill or is otherwise unable to feed her offspring, the operator shall provide milk from other bitches and queens at the same holding and supplementary milk formulas designed for puppies and kittens with the feeding frequency as instructed by the formula producer or a veterinarian, until weaning is completed. deleted Amendment 256
    Proposal for a regulation
    Annex I – point 1 – point 1.4 1.4.  The operator shall ensure that all unweaned puppies and kittens are getting enough milk to steadily gain bodyweight. 1.4.  All unweaned puppies and kittens shall be fed enough milk, milk replacer or a combination thereof to steadily gain bodyweight. Amendment 257
    Proposal for a regulation
    Annex I – point 2 – point 2.1 – paragraph 1 – point a (a)  10 to 26°C in the indoor areas where adult dogs are kept; deleted Amendment 258
    Proposal for a regulation
    Annex I – point 2 – point 2.1 – paragraph 1 – point b (b)  15 to 26°C in the indoor areas where adult cats are kept; deleted Amendment 259
    Proposal for a regulation
    Annex I – point 2 – point 2.2 – point 2.2.1 2.2.1.  Where applicable, artificial lighting shall be provided for a period at least equivalent to the period of natural light normally available between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. 2.2.1.  Dogs and cats shall be exposed to light for at least 7 hours per day. Amendment 260
    Proposal for a regulation
    Annex I – point 2 – point 2.2 – point 2.2.2 2.2.2.  Artificial light shall be broad spectrum or full spectrum. 2.2.2.  Artificial light shall be broad spectrum or full spectrum with a frequency of at least 80 Hertz. Amendment 261
    Proposal for a regulation
    Annex I – point 2 – point 2.2 – point 2.2.3 2.2.3.  The illuminance shall be at least 50 lux at the height of an animal’s head. deleted Amendment 262
    Proposal for a regulation
    Annex I – point 2 – point 2.2 – point 2.2.4 2.2.4.  Animals shall have the possibility to stay in the dark for at least 8 hours per day. 2.2.4.  Dogs and cats shall have the possibility to be without artificial lights for at least 8 hours per day. Amendment 263
    Proposal for a regulation
    Annex I – point 2 – point 2.2 a (new) 2.2a.  Dogs shall have access to an outdoor area or shall be walked daily for a minimum of 1 hour per day in total, to allow exercise, exploration and socialisation Amendment 264
    Proposal for a regulation
    Annex I – point 2 – point 2.3 – point 2.3.3 2.3.3.  If enclosures are occupied by more than one dog or cat, operators must ensure by taking specific measures (e.g., separation panels) that these animals do not pose threat to each other due to aggressive behaviour. 2.3.3.  If enclosures are occupied by more than one dog or cat, operators must ensure by taking specific measures (e.g., separation panels) that these animals do not pose threat to each other due to aggressive behaviour. Member States may grant derogations from the minimum space allowances requirements set out in paragraph 2.3.1 for hunting dogs used to living in packs. Amendment 265
    Proposal for a regulation
    Annex I – point 3 – point 3.2 3.2.  Bitches shall only be bred if their age is at least 18 months; 3.2.  Bitches shall only be bred from their second oestrus; Amendment 266
    Proposal for a regulation
    Annex I – point 3 – point 3.3 3.3.  Operators shall allow for up to 3 litters per bitch or queen within a period of 2 years. 3.3.  A bitch or queen shall not deliver more than 3 litters within a period of 2 years. Amendment 267
    Proposal for a regulation
    Annex I – point 3 – point 3.4 3.4.  After 3 consecutive litter-giving pregnancies of a bitch or a queen within a period of 2 years, operators shall ensure a recuperation period by preventing pregnancies of the bitch or queen for a period of at least 1 year. 3.4.  For bitches and queens that have delivered 3 litters, including stillborns within a period of 2 years, there shall be a recuperation period of at least 1 year. Amendment 268
    Proposal for a regulation
    Annex I – point 3 – point 3.4 a (new) 3.4a.  Any bitch or queen that has undergone two cesarean sections shall no longer be used for breeding Amendment 269
    Proposal for a regulation
    Annex I – point 3 – point 3.4 b (new) 3.4b.  Before any bitch aged 8 years or more and any queen aged 6 years or more, is used for breeding, it must have been physically examined by a veterinarian who confirms in writing that, at the time of the examination, there are no counter-indications to pregnancy. The operator shall keep the written confirmation referred for a period of at least 3 years Amendment 270
    Proposal for a regulation
    Annex I – point 4 – point 4.1 – point c (c)  areas where cats and dogs are kept are equipped with enrichment structures and items accessible to all animals, providing a stimulating environment, and reducing frustration of animals; (c)  areas where cats and dogs are kept are equipped with enrichment structures and items accessible to all animals, providing a stimulating environment, and if possible, structures for climbing and hiding, and reducing frustration of animals; Amendment 271
    Proposal for a regulation
    Annex II – introductory part Transponders used to mark cats and dogs as required in Article 16 shall meet the following requirements: Transponders used to individually identify dogs and cat as required in Article 17 and Article 21 shall meet the following requirements: Amendment 272
    Proposal for a regulation
    Annex III – point 1 1.  Number of dogs and cats microchipped per year as referred to in Article 17; 1.  Number of dogs and cats registered per year as referred to in Article 17 and Article 21(4); Amendment 273
    Proposal for a regulation
    Annex III – point 1 a (new) 1a.  Number of establishments registered per year in accordance with Article 7; Amendment 274
    Proposal for a regulation
    Annex III – point 2 2.  Number of breeding establishment approved per year as referred to in Article 16. 2.  Number of breeding establishments approved per year as referred to in Article 7a. Amendment 275
    Proposal for a regulation
    Annex III – point 2 a (new) 2a.   Number of breeding and selling establishments whose approval has been suspended or withdrawn per year.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Text adopted – Case of Ahmadreza Djalali in Iran – P10_TA(2025)0133 – Thursday, 19 June 2025 – Strasbourg

    Source: European Parliament

    The European Parliament,

    –  having regard to its previous resolutions on the Islamic Republic of Iran,

    –  having regard to Rules 150(5) and 136(4) of its Rules of Procedure,

    A.  whereas Swedish-Iranian national Dr Ahmadreza Djalali, a specialist in emergency medicine and a scholar at Belgium’s Vrije Universiteit Brussel and Italy’s Università del Piemonte Orientale, was arrested on 24 April 2016 by the Iranian security forces;

    B.  whereas Djalali was sentenced to death on spurious espionage charges in October 2017 following a grossly unfair trial based on a confession extracted under torture; whereas the sentence was upheld by Iran’s Supreme Court on 17 June 2018;

    C.  whereas Djalali has been denied adequate medical care despite the severe deterioration in his physical health and the risk to his life, including a recent heart attack at Evin prison; whereas Iran has continued to threaten to implement his death sentence;

    D.  whereas hundreds of individuals have already been executed in 2025 and at least 972 were executed in 2024, a 14 % increase on 2023;

    E.  whereas the Iranian Government refuses to recognise Djalali’s Swedish citizenship;

    F.  whereas this case is part of a systematic pattern of unlawful detentions and hostage diplomacy by the Iranian regime;

    1.  Calls on Iran to immediately release Dr Djalali along with all political prisoners currently being detained; calls on Iran to put a moratorium on executions and to abolish the death penalty;

    2.  Strongly condemns Djalali’s sham trial and the Iranian authorities’ brutal treatment of him, amounting to torture and ill treatment, as he was subjected to months of interrogation in solitary confinement, and then sentenced to death;

    3.  Urges Iran to provide Djalali, whose health is deteriorating, with immediate and unrestricted access to necessary specialised medical care at an external hospital; urges Iran, furthermore, to provide Djalali with legal representation and legal defence, and allow him regular contact with his family;

    4.  Calls on Sweden and other relevant Member States and the European External Action Service to intensify diplomatic efforts and adopt targeted measures in response to Iran’s continued detention of EU nationals, including Cécile Kohler, Jacques Paris and others, as part of its hostage diplomacy and in violation of international law;

    5.  Reiterates its call on the Council to designate the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps a terrorist organisation and extend EU sanctions to all those responsible for taking EU nationals hostage and for mass executions of opposition voices and other human rights violations;

    6.  Demands that Iran grant full access to UN human rights mechanisms, including the Special Rapporteur, and the EU’s full support and increase support for civil society organisations;

    7.  Emphasises that EU-Iran engagements must be founded on tangible progress on democracy, the rule of law, human rights and the release of all political prisoners;

    8.  Asks the VP/HR to raise Djalali’s case publicly and in all engagements with her Iranian counterparts;

    9.  Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Government of Iran, the VP/HR, the Commission, the Member States and the United Nations.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Text adopted – Dissolution of political parties and the crackdown on the opposition in Mali – P10_TA(2025)0134 – Thursday, 19 June 2025 – Strasbourg

    Source: European Parliament

    The European Parliament,

    –  having regard to Rules 150(5) and 136(4) of its Rules of Procedure,

    A.  whereas the military has ruled Mali since the 2020 coup that installed General Assimi Goïta as transitional president, and the repeatedly promised elections have not taken place;

    B.  whereas on 13 May 2025, the military authorities dissolved political parties and organisations and repealed laws protecting political participation, sparking domestic protests and international concern over the consolidation of authoritarian rule and repression and criminalisation of the opposition and protesters;

    C.  whereas recent abductions and arrests of opposition members have added to the enforced disappearances dating back to at least 2021, and the military junta has intensified its repression of the political opposition and civil liberties;

    D.  whereas on 11 June 2025, the Malian Council of Ministers adopted a bill authorising a five-year renewable mandate for the transitional president without election;

    E.  whereas the EU continues to support civil society and provide humanitarian aid in Mali;

    F.  whereas al-Qaeda-affiliated Islamist terrorist groups have been killing civilians, including Christians and people from other religious minorities;

    G.  whereas the EU and several Member States have deployed troops who have lost their lives fighting jihadism at the request of the former Malian authorities, including 58 French soldiers, 2 Dutch soldiers and 1 Portuguese soldier;

    H.  whereas Mali is negatively affected by Russian disinformation;

    1.  Expresses deep concern about the alarming political and security situation in Mali; strongly condemns the dissolution of political parties and organisations and the crackdown on the opposition;

    2.  Criticises the Malian authorities’ intensified actions undermining democracy, human rights, freedom of expression and association, and peaceful assembly;

    3.  Urges the Malian authorities to respect international human rights law and Mali’s signed commitments on political and civil rights;

    4.  Recalls the transitional president’s instruction to his cabinet in November 2024 to create conditions for transparent and peaceful elections as soon as possible;

    5.  Urges the authorities to immediately release those arrested or abducted for political reasons, permanently end repression and intimidation, guarantee the safety of opposition members, activists and civil society actors, and ensure peace and stability in Mali;

    6.  Notes with regret that Mali is still plagued by violence and Islamist terrorism; recalls that Russian-sponsored mercenaries have failed to bring stability; calls for ensuring accountability for rights violations and abuses, including war crimes committed by the Wagner Group/Africa Corps against the Malian people;

    7.  Encourages closer cooperation between the EU, the EUSR for the Sahel, ECOWAS and the African Union in promoting stability and human rights in Mali;

    8.  Expresses serious concern over the growing illegal migration flows from Mali towards Europe, fuelled by growing insecurity, political instability and economic stagnation; calls on the Malian authorities to take full responsibility for preventing uncontrolled departures and urges the EU to strengthen return policies and cooperation on migration control with Mali and transit countries;

    9.  Underlines the EU’s clear support for restoring multi-party democracy, providing assistance to civil society and democratic actors and ensuring that human rights are the main priority for EU support under the renewed approach to the Sahel region;

    10.  Calls on the VP/HR and the Member States to raise with the Malian authorities the urgent need to restore democratic order and protect human rights;

    11.  Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the VP/HR, Mali’s transitional president, the Malian National Assembly, the African Union and ECOWAS.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Text adopted – Media freedom in Georgia, particularly the case of Mzia Amaglobeli – P10_TA(2025)0132 – Thursday, 19 June 2025 – Strasbourg

    Source: European Parliament

    The European Parliament,

    –  having regard to its previous resolutions on Georgia,

    –  having regard to Rules 150(5) and 136(4) of its Rules of Procedure,

    A.  whereas Mzia Amaglobeli, a journalist and co-founder of Batumelebi and Netgazeti outlets, was arrested during pro-European protests on 12 January 2025 and faces four to seven years in prison for a provoked incident involving a police officer;

    B.  whereas the adoption of draconian legislation – such as the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA) and amendments to the Law on Broadcasting, Code of Administrative Offences and Law on Grants – constitutes a dangerous acceleration of democratic backsliding and deliberate authoritarian strategy by Georgian Dream to silence critical voices in civil society and independent media and persecute the political opposition;

    C.  whereas the authorities have virtually annihilated remaining independent media outlets in the country; whereas the public information space is fully dominated by pro-government media, spreading Russian-style propaganda and anti-European disinformation;

    D.  whereas in Mzia Amaglobeli’s case, the authorities ignored procedural safeguards, imposed pre-trial detention without a clear legal basis, contested by the Public Defender, and assigned a presiding judge lacking qualifications in criminal law; whereas she is being punished for exposing corruption and reporting on election fraud during the 2024 elections;

    E.  whereas she reportedly suffered inhumane treatment and undertook a 38-day hunger strike;

    F.  whereas Estonia and Lithuania have imposed personal sanctions on Georgian judges and police officers linked to Mzia Amaglobeli’s case;

    1.  Demands Mzia Amaglobeli’s immediate and unconditional release and the withdrawal of all charges against her, and denounces her politically motivated arrest and prosecution;

    2.  Strongly condemns the Georgian Dream regime’s systemic assault on democratic institutions, political opposition, independent media, civil society and judicial independence;

    3.  Expresses deep concern over arbitrary detentions and the harassment of, and violence against, journalists in Georgia, including smear campaigns, legal persecution, abuse and gender-based violence in detention; calls for independent investigations and urges the authorities to immediately end intimidation and ensure journalists’ safety and freedom;

    4.  Urges the Georgian authorities to release all political prisoners and other illegally detained persons without delay, including activist Mate Devidze, opposition leaders Zurab Japaridze, Nika Melia and Nika Gvaramia, and former President Mikheil Saakashvili, and denounces the violent abduction of UNM Chair Tina Bokuchava’s husband and the reported threats to her children’s safety;

    5.  Calls for the immediate repeal of all repressive legislation, the restoration of democracy, and full protection of media freedom and civil liberties;

    6.  Calls for the EU to step up support for Georgia’s independent media and civil society following the entry into force of the FARA, and monitor ongoing trials;

    7.  Regrets the persistent inaction of the Council, Member States and Commission and reiterates its repeated call on Member States to impose bilateral sanctions against Georgian Dream leaders and officials responsible for democratic backsliding;

    8.  Expresses concern about the latest wave of assaults on NGOs, through the demand by some state institutions, such as the Anti-Corruption Bureau, to provide detailed financial, legal and operational information for the last one and a half years within three working days; underscores that this demand is unfeasible by design and as such risks paralysing the work of targeted organisations and suspending their activities;

    9.  Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the governments and parliaments of the Member States, the Council of Europe, the OSCE, President Zourabichvili, and the self-appointed authorities of Georgia.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Somerset pig farmer counts the cost of slurry pollution

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    Press release

    Somerset pig farmer counts the cost of slurry pollution

    Pig slurry overflowed from the store, got into surface water drains and then the stream.

    Slurry escaped from the store and polluted a nearby stream.

    • James Mitchell built an illegal slurry lagoon which overtopped causing pollution
    • The avoidable incident occurred as pig slurry escaped into the Oake Stream nearby
    • The experienced farmer pleaded guilty to the offences and was fined a total of £5,065, including costs

    A Taunton pig farmer has been prosecuted by the Environment Agency for allowing slurry to escape from an illegally constructed slurry lagoon causing pollution of the Oake Stream in Somerset.

    James Mitchell, of Hillcommon in Taunton, Somerset appeared before Taunton Magistrates Court on Wednesday, 18 June 2025. Mr Mitchell pleaded guilty to two offences and was fined £500 with a £200 surcharge and was ordered to pay £4,365 in investigation costs after the District Judge gave him full credit for his guilty pleas. The fine was based on his means as disclosed to the court and he was given 12 months to pay.

    The court heard that the agency visited Orchard farm in 2021, at James Mitchell’s request. The agency identified a slurry lagoon that had been constructed without prior notification and with no details on how it had been correctly sized or engineered.

    The visit had been arranged to discuss proposed grant funding for roofing work which it was hoped would reduce the pollution risk. The agency had no objections to roofing work being completed on the condition that the slurry store was made compliant.

    Pollution in stream traced to Orchard Farm

    On 9 November 2023, the Environment Agency received a report of pollution in the Oake Stream. Officers traced the source of the pollution to Orchard Farm where pig slurry was found overflowing from the slurry store and entering a soakaway which is connected to the surface water drainage network.

    Mitchell cooperated with the investigating officers and prevented further slurry entering the drains by initially building an earth bank which was later reinforced with additional clay.  

    At a follow-up visit in December 2023, Environment Agency officers noted that the construction of the roof, originally discussed in 2021 was underway. These works were completed by January 2024.

    David Womack, of the Environment Agency, said:

    James Mitchell is an experienced farmer and was made fully aware of his responsibilities and the laws regarding slurry storage, having contacted us before this needless incident occurred.

    Regulations on how to properly construct slurry stores and the need to notify the agency prior to constructing any new slurry store have been in place for more than 30 years. All farmers need to be aware of their legal responsibilities to prevent pollution events like this from happening.

    We won’t hesitate to take action against those who cause pollution having failed to take on board our advice and guidance. I’d strongly advise those who need advice or who think that their slurry storage facilities are too small or a pollution risk to contact us as we would prefer to prevent this type of incident from occurring in the first place.

    The Environment Agency provides specialist advice to help farmers assess their existing slurry storage facilities to reduce pollution risk and to ensure the environment is properly protected.

    Guidance for farmers on appropriate slurry storage is available: Storing silage, slurry and agricultural fuel oil – GOV.UK

    Background

    James Mitchell was charged with the following offences:

    • On or before 9 November 2023, James Mitchell caused or permitted a water discharge activity, namely a discharge of pig slurry, into Oake Stream, except under and to the extent authorised by an environmental permit. Contrary to Regulation 38(1)(a) and Regulation 12(1)(b) of the Environmental Permitting (England and Wales) Regulations 2016.

    • James Mitchell, on or before 9 November 2023 at Orchard Farm, Hillcommon, Taunton, Somerset, TA4 1DW failed to store slurry in a slurry storage system which satisfied the requirements of Schedule 2 (6) (3) (c) of the Water Resources (Control of Pollution) (Silage, Slurry and Agricultural Fuel Oil) (England) Regulations 2010 in that there is the need to provide at least 750 millimetres of freeboard in the case of a tank with walls made of earth and 300 millimetres of freeboard in all other cases. Contrary to Regulation 10 (1) and 4 (1) of the Water Resources (Control of Pollution) (Silage, Slurry and Agricultural Fuel Oil) (England) Regulations 2010.

    Updates to this page

    Published 24 June 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: UKEF unveils new strategic financing for industrial growth

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    Press release

    UKEF unveils new strategic financing for industrial growth

    Up to £13 billion of direct lending will be used to help boost British exports across key industrial sectors as part of new growth measures spearheaded by UK Export Finance (UKEF).

    • Multi-billion-pound direct lending by UK Export Finance will help boost orders for British exporters across key industrial sectors, including defence

    • Export credit agency to introduce new product to secure critical minerals supply and plans to legislate to increase its statutory commitment limit to support even more businesses

    • New measures announced as part of Industrial Strategy published yesterday

    Through its Direct Lending Facility, UKEF – the government’s export credit agency – provides loans to overseas buyers, allowing them to finance the purchase of capital goods and services from UK suppliers.

    Outlined in the Industrial Strategy, UKEF now has greater flexibility of direct lending powers to support all eight Industrial Strategy sectors, from clean industries and life sciences to advanced manufacturing and defence.

    The £13 billion marks a £3 billion uplift in UKEF’s facility. Of this £13 billion, at least £3 billion will be used to stimulate defence exports, demonstrating the growing importance of this sector to economic and national security.

    Recent direct lending deals include a £18.8 million equivalent loan for an Angolan clean water project delivering up to approximately £6.8 million of supply contracts for British exporters, and a £23 million equivalent loan to Iraq’s Ministry of Interior to purchase 62 UK-made fire-fighting vehicles.

    Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds said:

    UKEF plays an instrumental role in delivering our Industrial Strategy – providing the essential support that British businesses need to compete internationally.  

    By unlocking export opportunities and supporting innovation across key sectors through mechanisms like direct lending, UKEF is helping to drive sustainable economic growth, create highly skilled jobs and strengthen Britain’s place as a go-to trading partner.  

    Our commitment to backing British exporters forms a vital part of this government’s Plan for Change which will raise living standards in every part of UK.

    Following on from the announcement of UKEF’s Critical Minerals Supply Finance product in the Autumn Statement, the department is going further to secure industry access to critical minerals by launching a new loan guarantee scheme for UK-based suppliers that sell critical minerals, or products that contain critical minerals, to UK exporters.  

    UKEF also plans to legislate to have its statutory commitment limit – the entire amount of support that the department can have on its books at any one time – increased which will enable it to support more businesses of all sizes across the UK. The department will review its operating mandate to consider taking on a broader trade and investment finance remit.

    To encourage growth at a local level, the department plans to expand its network of 24 local export finance managers to give focus on city regions and clusters where key sectors have a presence. Export finance managers provide free and impartial guidance to businesses on their export finance needs.

    UK Export Finance CEO Tim Reid added:

    UKEF is well positioned to drive exports across high-impact industry sectors and create economic growth. We look forward to playing a key role in driving delivery of the Industrial Strategy, using our increased capacity and flexible product range.

    Backed by our comprehensive five-year business plan that will reach businesses of all sizes across every region and nation of the UK, we’re laying the extra foundations to enable thousands more British businesses to take their products and services to global markets.

    The measures are announced ahead of UKEF’s 2024/25 annual report & accounts which will be published shortly. The results are expected to show it was a record-breaking year for the department.

    It will build on the results of the 2023/24 financial year in which UKEF provided over £8.8 billion of support to 650 businesses of all sizes and types, supported up to 41,000 jobs in communities around the whole UK and the contribution of up to £3.3 billion to the overall economy.

    Contact 

    Media enquiries:

    Updates to this page

    Published 24 June 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: David Mitchell convicted for covering road with potatoes and silt

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    Press release

    David Mitchell convicted for covering road with potatoes and silt

    Huge loss of soil from potato field costs farmer over £40,000 for polluting river, with potatoes and silt escaping into the road.

    The run-off soil was ankle deep and caused severe issues on the road.

    • Potato and silt mudslide polluted nearby watercourse and shut local roads.
    • David Mitchell, an experienced farmer, was fully aware of his obligations to reduce risk to the local environment.
    • Fines, costs and compensation for this incident totalled over £40,000.

    A Taunton potato farmer has been prosecuted by the Environment Agency for causing silt, soil and potatoes to escape from a field and seriously pollute a tributary of the River Tone in Somerset.

    The judge found that the pollution was so significant in that it would take a winter of normal water flow to wash the sediment away. 

    David Mitchell, of Hillcommon in Taunton, Somerset appeared before Taunton Magistrates Court on 18 June 2025. Mr Mitchell pleaded guilty to an offence of causing silt laden water from a field under his control at Combe Florey to enter a stream on two occasions in August and again on September 2022.

    He was given full credit for his guilty plea by the District Judge and fines and compensation were ordered to be paid within 12 months. He was ordered to pay a total of £9,078 in fines and costs based on his means as disclosed to the court. The court heard that other clean up, equipment purchases and compensation to the landowner, already paid by Mr Mitchell, have totalled over £35,000.

    River hit hard by run-off sediment

    On 7 September 2022, an Environment Agency officer identified a sediment pollution to the Back Stream watercourse in Combe Florey. A considerable length of the bed of the watercourse was found to be covered, bank to bank, in a thick layer of sediment. The investigating officer traced the pollution to a large field close to the railway bridge in Combe Florey where soil had run off the field down onto the A358 and into the Back Stream.

    The field had been rented that year by Mitchell to grow potatoes, which had not yet been harvested when the pollution occurred. Thunderstorms and wet weather conditions resulted in the loss of an estimated 50-100 tonnes of soil from the field.

    Large numbers of potatoes could be seen in the watercourse and along the edge of the roadside, along with the significant quantities of silt and mud. The busy A358 had to be closed on two occasions for the Highways Agency to clear drains and remove tonnes of soil from the road. 

    The soil deposited under the railway bridge was so deep it prevented vehicles from being able to use the A358. Mr Mitchell agreed to pay compensation of £1,128.10 to a motorist for their losses as a result of this incident.

    A considerable length of the Back Stream watercourse’s river bed in Combe Florey was covered, bank to bank, in a thick layer of sediment.

    Road closed by similar incident month earlier

    The Environment Agency investigations revealed that there had also been an earlier incident in August 2022 which had also closed the A358. Following the initial incident in August, Mitchell, an experienced potato grower, was provided with silt fencing along with guidance and advice paid for by the Somerset Rivers Authority. Only a small section of fencing was used and this was not installed according to the guidance given by advisors.

    A small number of hay bales and a soil bund had also been installed at the bottom of the field in an attempt to prevent further soil from leaving the field. It was also established that the potatoes had mainly been planted up and down the sloping field which significantly increased the risk of soil erosion and run off.

    David Womack, of the Environment Agency, said:

    David Mitchell had control and custody of the land he rented up until the point of harvest and was therefore responsible for the land management practices.

    He chose to grow a high-risk crop on a sloping field with light soils. As an experienced potato farmer he should have identified the risks of using this field and taken reasonable steps to prevent large scale soil loss.

    No formal risk assessment and no adequate precautions to prevent soil loss had been taken. This made it highly likely that soil erosion and environmental damage would occur in even moderate rainfall conditions.

    The Environment Agency expects that all farmers need to be aware of their legal responsibilities to prevent pollution events like this from happening. Farmers renting their fields for the growing of high risk vegetables should ask prospective tenants what they intend to grow and ask to see their risk assessments and soil management plans to ensure they don’t also potentially become liable for such incidents.

    Guidance for farmers is available: The Reduction and Prevention of Agricultural Diffuse Pollution (England) Regulations 2018

    Background

    David Mitchell was charged with the following offences:

    • On or before 7 September 2022 David Mitchell did knowingly cause or permit an unpermitted water discharge activity, namely the discharge of poisonous, noxious or polluting matter, namely silt laden water from a field under his control at Combe Florey, Somerset into inland fresh waters, namely Back Stream.

    Updates to this page

    Published 24 June 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Local Government 2024-25 Provisional Outturn and 2025-26 Budget Estimates

    Source: Scottish Government

    An Official Statistics Publication.

    The Chief Statistician has released figures on 2024-25 provisional outturn and 2025-26 budget estimates for revenue and capital expenditure on services provided by local authorities.

    In 2024-25, net revenue expenditure on local authority services was provisionally reported as £15,760 million in 2024-25 and budgeted as £16,239 million for 2025-26.

    This is an increase of 6.8% (£1,002 million) in 2024-25, compared to the net revenue expenditure figure of £14,758 million seen in 2023-24. However, much of this increase can be attributed to the baselining of £950.9 million into the General Revenue Grant, which switched this funding away from the category of specific grants. As Net Revenue Expenditure measures general funding and the use of Council’s own reserves, funding more money via the General Revenue Grant leads to a corresponding rise in Net Revenue Expenditure.

    General fund net revenue expenditure is estimated to increase by a further 3.0% (£479 million) in 2025-26.

    Education and Social Work continue to be the services with highest net revenue expenditure in both 2024-25 and 2025-26. These services account for around 81% of general fund net revenue expenditure.

    Local authorities reported provisional general funding of £16,394 million in 2024-25, and budgeted for £17,358 million of general funding in 2025-26.

    General Fund reserves (including Harbour Accounts) at 31 March 2025 were provisionally reported as £2,771 million, and budgeted to be £2,625 million at 31 March 2026. For context, General Fund reserve balances (including Harbour Accounts) were £1,584 million on 31 March 2020. Therefore, whilst reserve balances remain above pre-pandemic levels for Scotland, these are being brought down.

    Capital expenditure across local authorities was provisionally reported as £4,479 million in 2024-25, and budgeted as £5,035 million in 2025-26. An increase of 1.6% in capital expenditure for Education is expected from 2024-25 to 2025-26, reflecting the roll out of the Learning Estate Investment Programme.

    The main sources of capital financing are grants & contributions and borrowing. Borrowing is expected to increase to £2,395 million in 2024-25, and then to £3,021 million in 2025-26. In 2024-25 and 2025-26, in-year borrowing is anticipated to remain as the primary source of capital financing.

    Total external debt was provisionally reported as £22,916 million in 2024-25, and budgeted as £25,696 million in 2025-26, with local authorities continuing to remain under-borrowed.

    Background

    The Local Government 2024-25 Provisional Outturn and 2025-26 Budget Estimates publication summarises the 2024-25 provisional outturn and 2025-26 budget estimates for revenue and capital services provided by local authorities. This data is collected from local authorities annually via the Provisional Outturn and Budget Estimates (POBE) statistical return.

    Further information on Local Government Finance statistics publications and data collections can be found on the Scottish Government website.

    These statistics have been produced in accordance with the Code of Practice for Statistics.

     

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Recorded Crime in Scotland, 2024-25

    Source: Scottish Government

    An Accredited Official Statistics Publication for Scotland

    Scotland’s Chief Statistician today released Recorded Crime in Scotland, 2024-25.

    Between 2023-24 and 2024-25:

    There was little change in crimes recorded by the police in Scotland, decreasing by less than 1%, from 299,790 to 299,111. The recording of crime remains below the position immediately prior to the pandemic (2019-20) and down 51% from its peak in 1991.

    There was little change in Non-sexual crimes of violence, decreasing by less than 1%, from 71,473 to 71,170. Common assault (down less than 1%) makes up the clear majority (83%) of all non-sexual crimes of violence recorded in 2024-25.

    Sexual crimes increased by 3%, from 14,484 to 14,892. These crimes are now at the second highest level seen since 1971, the first year for which comparable groups are available.

    There was little change in Crimes of dishonesty, decreasing by less than 1%, from 111,054 to 110,913. The recording of these crimes is back to the level seen immediately prior to the pandemic (in 2019-20) and down 74% from the peak in 1991.

    Damage and reckless behaviour crimes decreased by 6%, from 41,129 to 38,738. The recording of these crimes is now at the lowest level seen since 1976.

    Crimes against society increased by 3% from 61,650 to 63,398. Most of these crimes relate to crimes against public justice (42%) or drug possession (32%).

    Offences recorded by the police in Scotland collectively increased by 1%, from 174,073 to 175,919. This included increases in Miscellaneous offences (up 1%) and Road traffic offences (up 1%), whilst Antisocial offences changed very little, increasing by less than 1%.

    Police recorded cyber-crime in Scotland

    This bulletin also includes an estimate of how many cyber-crimes (i.e. crimes committed using the internet) were recorded in Scotland during 2024-25.

    In 2024-25, an estimated 14,120 cyber-crimes were recorded by the police in Scotland. This was a decrease of 2,770 crimes (or 16%)  when compared to the estimated volume for 2023-24 (16,890). Levels also remain significantly above the pre-pandemic year of 2019-20 (with 7,710 cyber-crimes).

    We estimate that cyber-crimes accounted for at least 5% of total recorded crime in 2024-25, including 27% of Sexual crimes, 7% of Crimes of dishonesty and 3% of Non-sexual crimes of violence.

    Official Statistics on Clear up rates

    In addition to the Accredited Official Statistics on police recorded crimes and offences, this bulletin also presents Official Statistics on crimes and offences cleared up by the police in 2024-25.

    In 2024-25 the clear up rate was 56.0%, up from 54.1% in 2023-24. Crimes against society (93.8%), Non-sexual crimes of violence (68.4%) and Sexual crime (56.9%) continued to have higher clear up rates in 2024-25 than Crimes of dishonesty (35.1%) and Damage and reckless behaviour (31.0%).

     

    Background

    1. The full statistical publication can be accessed at: Recorded Crime in Scotland, 2024-25 – gov.scot
    1. Contraventions of Scottish criminal law are divided for statistical purposes into crimes and offences. ‘Crime’ is generally used for the more serious criminal acts. The less serious termed ‘offences’, although the term ‘offence’ may also be used in relation to serious breaches of criminal law. The distinction is made only for statistical reporting purposes and the ‘seriousness’ of the offence is generally related to the maximum sentence that can be imposed.
    1. Further information on Crime and Justice statistics within Scotland can be accessed at: Crime and justice statistics – gov.scot (www.gov.scot)
    1. Accredited Official and Official Statistics are produced by professionally independent statistical staff – more information on the standards of Official Statistics in Scotland can be accessed at: Statistics and research – gov.scot (www.gov.scot)

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI Russia: Shaanxi Normal University Press to Open Branch in Kazakhstan

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: People’s Republic of China in Russian – People’s Republic of China in Russian –

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    BEIJING, June 24 (Xinhua) — The Shaanxi Normal University Press will open an editorial office in Kazakhstan to publish books on Chinese topics, according to the official website of the publishing house, based in Xi’an, the capital of Northwest China’s Shaanxi Province.

    The agreement to establish the editorial board was concluded last week within the framework of the 31st Beijing International Book Fair between the said publishing house, the publishing house of the Kazakh National University named after Al-Farabi /KazNU/ and the Nomad Culture Foundation.

    Director of the SPU Publishing House Liu Dongfeng stated that against the backdrop of the development of the “China-Central Asia Spirit,” the establishment of an editorial office for books on Chinese topics in Kazakhstan is of particular importance.

    The said editorial board is reportedly planning to publish a series of books aimed at Central Asian readers. They will include academic works on China’s high-quality development in politics, economics, science and technology, popular readings reflecting the beautiful traditional Chinese culture and the historical background of the Great Silk Road, as well as modern literary classics.

    In 2023, the SHPU Publishing House published the scientific work “The Great Silk Road and Civilized Contacts”. This book in Kazakh will soon be published by the KazNU Publishing House. -0-

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI Russia: The President of the Republic of Korea stressed the need to build peace on the Korean Peninsula

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: People’s Republic of China in Russian – People’s Republic of China in Russian –

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    SEOUL, June 24 (Xinhua) — President of the Republic of Korea (ROK) Lee Jae-myung stressed the need to build peace on the Korean Peninsula on Tuesday, a day ahead of the 75th anniversary of the Korean War.

    The President of the Republic of Kazakhstan stated at a meeting of the Cabinet of Ministers that security issues cannot be overestimated.

    “The creation of a world for which no one needs to fight is the most reliable security. Ensuring peace is the task of politics,” he noted.

    Lee Zhe-myung said security is directly related to economic issues, stressing that the slogan “The world will build the economy, the world will create food” has now become a reality. –0–

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI Russia: Senior CCP Official Visits UK

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: People’s Republic of China in Russian – People’s Republic of China in Russian –

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    LONDON, June 24 (Xinhua) — Yuan Jiajun, member of the Political Bureau of the Communist Party of China Central Committee and secretary of the CPC Chongqing Municipal Committee, led a party delegation to the United Kingdom from June 22 to 23 at the invitation of the British government.

    Yuan Jiajun met with UK National Security Adviser Jonathan Powell, attended a roundtable meeting between leading Chinese (Chongqing) and British enterprises, and held talks with Nicholas Lyons, Lord Mayor of the City of London, and Sherard Cowper-Coles, Chairman of the China-UK Business Council, among others.

    Yuan Jiajun said that China is willing to work with the UK to maintain the positioning of the two countries as strategic partners, further strengthen dialogue and cooperation, consolidate strategic ties, deepen political mutual trust, jointly respond to challenges, and continuously expand practical cooperation in economy and trade, science and technology, people-to-people and cultural exchanges, local affairs and other fields, so as to jointly promote stable and mutually beneficial China-UK relations.

    Chongqing is willing to leverage its strengths of industrial base, comprehensive hub role and megacity status to deepen exchanges and cooperation with the UK in areas such as smart manufacturing, trade and logistics, financial services and urban governance, making contributions to the further development of China-UK relations, he said.

    The British side said that UK-China relations are of strategic significance, and cooperation between the two sides is conducive to world peace and development. The UK is willing to expand exchanges with China, deepen cooperation in such fields as economy and trade, science and technology, investment, education, and jointly safeguard multilateralism and the free trade system. –0–

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-Evening Report: Iran and Israel agree to a fragile ceasefire. One factor could be crucial to it sticking

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Ali Mamouri, Research Fellow, Middle East Studies, Deakin University

    Amir Levy/Getty Images

    After 12 days of war, US President Donald Trump has announced a ceasefire between Israel and Iran that would bring to an end the most dramatic, direct conflict between the two nations in decades.

    Israel and Iran both agreed to adhere to the ceasefire, though they said they would respond with force to any breach.

    If the ceasefire holds – a big if – the key question will be whether this signals the start of lasting peace, or merely a brief pause before renewed conflict.

    As contemporary war studies show, peace tends to endure under one of two conditions: either the total defeat of one side, or the establishment of mutual deterrence. This means both parties refrain from aggression because the expected costs of retaliation far outweigh any potential gains.

    What did each side gain?

    The war marked a turning point for Israel in its decades-long confrontation with Iran. For the first time, Israel successfully brought a prolonged battle to Iranian soil, shifting the conflict from confrontations with Iranian-backed proxy militant groups to direct strikes on Iran itself.

    This was made possible largely due to Israel’s success over the past two years in weakening Iran’s regional proxy network, particularly Hezbollah in Lebanon and Shiite militias in Syria.

    Over the past two weeks, Israel has inflicted significant damage on Iran’s military and scientific elite, killing several high-ranking commanders and nuclear scientists. The civilian toll was also high.

    Additionally, Israel achieved a major strategic objective by pulling the United States directly into the conflict. In coordination with Israel, the US launched strikes on three of Iran’s primary nuclear facilities: Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan.

    Despite these gains, Israel did not accomplish all of its stated goals. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had voiced support for regime change, urging Iranians to rise up against Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei’s government, but the senior leadership in Iran remains intact.

    Additionally, Israel did not fully eliminate Iran’s missile program, as Iran continued striking to the last minute before the ceasefire. And Tehran did not acquiesce to Trump’s pre-war demand to end uranium enrichment.

    Although Iran was caught off-guard by Israel’s attacks — particularly as it was engaged in nuclear negotiations with the US — it responded by launching hundreds of missiles towards Israel.

    While many were intercepted, a significant number penetrated Israeli air defences, causing widespread destruction in major cities, dozens of fatalities and hundreds of injuries.

    Iran demonstrated its capacity to strike back, though Israel succeeded in destroying many of its air defence systems, some ballistic missile assets (including missile launchers) and multiple energy facilities.

    Since the beginning of the assault, Iranian officials have repeatedly called for a halt to resume negotiations. Under intense pressure, Iran realised it would not benefit from a prolonged war of attrition with Israel — especially as both nations faced mounting costs and the risk of depleting their military stockpiles if the war continued.

    As theories of victory suggest, success in war is defined not only by the damage inflicted, but by achieving core strategic goals and weakening the enemy’s will and capacity to resist.

    While Israel claims to have achieved the bulk of its objectives, the extent of the damage to Iran’s nuclear program is not fully known, nor is its capacity to continue enriching uranium.

    Both sides could remain locked in a volatile standoff over Iran’s nuclear program, with the conflict potentially reigniting whenever either side perceives a strategic opportunity.

    Sticking point over Iran’s nuclear program

    Iran faces even greater challenges as it emerges from the war. With a heavy toll on its leadership and nuclear infrastructure, Tehran will likely prioritise rebuilding its deterrence capability.

    That includes acquiring new advanced air defence systems — potentially from China — and restoring key components of its missile and nuclear programs. (Some experts say Iran did not use some of its most powerful missiles to maintain this deterrence.)

    Iranian officials have claimed they safeguarded more than 400 kilograms of 60% enriched uranium before the attacks. This stockpile could theoretically be converted into nine to ten nuclear warheads if further enriched to 90%.

    Trump declared Iran’s nuclear capacity had been “totally obliterated”, whereas Rafael Grossi, the United Nations’ nuclear watchdog chief, said damage to Iran’s facilities was “very significant”.

    However, analysts have argued Iran will still have a depth of technical knowledge accumulated over decades. Depending on the extent of the damage to its underground facilities, Iran could be capable of restoring and even accelerating its program in a relatively short time frame.

    And the chances of reviving negotiations on Iran’s nuclear program appear slimmer than ever.

    What might future deterrence look like?

    The war has fundamentally reshaped how both Iran and Israel perceive deterrence — and how they plan to secure it going forward.

    For Iran, the conflict reinforced the belief that its survival is at stake. With regime change openly discussed during the war, Iran’s leaders appear more convinced than ever that true deterrence requires two key pillars: nuclear weapons capability, and deeper strategic alignment with China and Russia.

    As a result, Iran is expected to move rapidly to restore and advance its nuclear program, potentially moving towards actual weaponisation — a step it had long avoided, officially.

    At the same time, Tehran is likely to accelerate military and economic cooperation with Beijing and Moscow to hedge against isolation. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi emphasised this close engagement with Russia during a visit to Moscow this week, particularly on nuclear matters.

    Israel, meanwhile, sees deterrence as requiring constant vigilance and a credible threat of overwhelming retaliation. In the absence of diplomatic breakthroughs, Israel may adopt a policy of immediate preemptive strikes on Iranian facilities or leadership figures if it detects any new escalation — particularly related to Iran’s nuclear program.

    In this context, the current ceasefire appears fragile. Without comprehensive negotiations that address the core issues — namely, Iran’s nuclear capabilities — the pause in hostilities may prove temporary.

    Mutual deterrence may prevent a more protracted war for now, but the balance remains precarious and could collapse with little warning.

    Ali Mamouri does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. Iran and Israel agree to a fragile ceasefire. One factor could be crucial to it sticking – https://theconversation.com/iran-and-israel-agree-to-a-fragile-ceasefire-one-factor-could-be-crucial-to-it-sticking-259669

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-OSI Submissions: Pakistan: Recurrent drone strikes in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa signal alarming disregard for civilian life – Amnesty International

    Source: Amnesty International

    Responding to recurrent drone strikes in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province of Pakistan that have killed at least 17 people, including five children, this year with the latest deadly strike on Friday, 20 June, Isabelle Lassée, Deputy Regional Director for South Asia at Amnesty International said:

    “Pakistani authorities have failed to take action to protect the lives and property of civilians in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa who continue to pay the price of an escalating number of drone strikes in the province. Last Friday’s drone strike, killing one child, is part of an alarming series of attacks which have escalated since March of this year.

    “Use of drones and quadcopters to conduct attacks resulting in unlawful killing of civilians violates international law. Reports that the strikes have hit homes and volleyball games indicate a reckless disregard for civilian life.

    “While Pakistani authorities have often denied responsibility for these attacks, they are obligated to conduct prompt, independent, transparent and effective investigations into these attacks and bring all those responsible to justice through fair trials. In cases where the Pakistani authorities are found to be directly responsible or where authorities failed to protect civilians from foreseeable threats, victims and families impacted in the strike must be provided with effective remedies, including compensation and other appropriate reparation.”

    BACKGROUND:

    Multiple drone strikes have taken place in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province in Pakistan, at least four of which have killed or injured civilians since March 2025.

    The latest drone strike on 20 June resulted in the death of one child and left five others injured in Dashka, Makeen Tehsil, South Waziristan district. Earlier this year, on 29 March, a strike in Katlang, Mardan district killed at least 11 people. The provincial government, in a press note, acknowledged civilian casualties. On 19 May a strike in Hurmuz, Mir Ali, North Waziristan district killed four children and injured five others. The Pakistani authorities deniedresponsibility, accusing the Tehreek-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) of carrying out the attack. On 28 May, a drone struck a volleyball match injuring 22 people, including seven children, in Wana, South Waziristan district. In September last year, a drone strike in Sararogha Tehsil, South Waziristan district killed one person and injured three others.

    Drone strikes have been long part of “counterterrorism” efforts in Pakistan.

    MIL OSI – Submitted News

  • What is NATO’s new 5% defence spending target?

    Source: Government of India

    Source: Government of India (4)

    NATO leaders are expected to endorse a big new defence spending target at an alliance summit in The Hague on Wednesday, as demanded by U.S. President Donald Trump.

    Here are some key questions and answers about the new target.

    WHAT ARE NATO LEADERS EXPECTED TO APPROVE?

    They are expected to agree that NATO members should spend 5% of their economic output – or Gross Domestic Product (GDP) – on core defence and broader defence and security-related investments.

    That’s a hefty increase on the current goal of 2%, which was approved at an alliance summit in Wales in 2014. But the new target will be measured differently.

    NATO members will be expected to spend 3.5% of their GDP on core defence such as troops and weapons – the items currently covered by the old 2% target.

    They will also be expected to spend a further 1.5% of GDP on broader defence and security-related investments – such as adapting roads, bridges and ports for use by military vehicles, and on cyber-security and protecting energy pipelines.

    HOW BIG A LEAP WILL THIS BE FOR NATO COUNTRIES?

    Very big for a lot of them.

    Twenty-two of NATO’s 32 member countries spent 2% of GDP or more on defence last year.

    As a whole, alliance members spent 2.61% of NATO GDP on defence last year, according to a NATO estimate. But that number masks big differences in spending among members.

    Poland, for example, spent more than 4% of its GDP on defence, making it the biggest spender. At the other end of the spectrum, Spain spent less than 1.3%.

    WHEN ARE NATO COUNTRIES EXPECTED TO HIT THE TARGET?

    They will be expected to meet the target by 2035. The targets could also be adjusted when they are reviewed in 2029.

    HOW MUCH MORE CASH ARE WE ACTUALLY TALKING ABOUT?

    It’s hard to say exactly how much extra cash NATO members would have to spend, not least because it will depend on the size of their economies for years to come.

    Also, NATO does not currently measure spending on the new broader category of defence and security-related investments – so there is no baseline measurement to go by.

    But NATO countries spent over $1.3 trillion on core defence in 2024, up from about a trillion a decade earlier in constant 2021 prices. If NATO states had all spent 3.5% of GDP on defence last year, that would have amounted to some $1.75 trillion.

    So, hitting the new targets could eventually mean spending hundreds of billions of dollars more per year, compared with current spending.

    WHY ARE NATO COUNTRIES INCREASING SPENDING NOW?

    Russia’s continued war in Ukraine, concerns about a possible future threat from Russia, and U.S. pressure have led many European capitals to boost investment in defence and plan to increase it even further over the coming years.

    “Russia could be ready to use military force against NATO within five years,” NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte said earlier this month.

    Europe is also preparing for the possibility that the U.S. under President Donald Trump will decide to withdraw some of its troops and capabilities from Europe.

    “America can’t be everywhere all the time, nor should we be,” U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said earlier this month.

    WHAT WILL THE NEW MONEY BE SPENT ON?

    NATO this month agreed on new capability targets for its members – the types of troops, military units, weapons and equipment that NATO says they should possess to defend themselves and the alliance.

    Those targets are classified but Rutte said after they were approved that the alliance needed to invest more in areas including “air defence, fighter jets, tanks, drones, personnel, logistics and so much more”.

    IS EVERYONE ON BOARD?

    Not quite. Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez says his country can meet its military capability targets by spending just 2.1% of GDP.

    His government approved the draft summit statement with the new spending target but made clear it does not intend to spend that much. NATO officials say Sanchez does not have an opt-out – Spain’s spending will be tracked and if it’s not investing enough to meet the military targets, it will need to improve.

    Some countries that have signed up to the targets may also not meet them, diplomats and analysts expect. But publicly, they have insisted they are committed.

    WHERE WILL THE MONEY COME FROM?

    Every NATO country will decide on its own where to find the cash to invest more in defence and how to allocate it.

    The European Union has moved to try to make it easier for capitals to spend on defence.

    The EU is allowing members to raise defence spending by 1.5% of GDP each year for four years without any disciplinary steps that would normally kick in once a national deficit is above 3% of GDP.

    EU ministers last month also approved the creation of a 150-billion-euro arms fund using joint EU borrowing to give loans to European countries for joint defence projects.

    Some European countries are pushing for EU joint borrowing to fund grants – rather than loans – for defence spending. But they have met resistance from fiscally conservative countries including Germany and The Netherlands.

    HOW DOES THE NATO TARGET COMPARE TO OTHER COUNTRIES’ DEFENCE SPENDING?

    NATO allies dedicate a much smaller share of their economic output to defence than Russia but, taken together, they spend significantly more cash than Moscow.

    Russia’s military spending rose by 38% in 2024, reaching an estimated $149 billion and 7.1% of GDP, according to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute.

    China, the world’s second-largest military spender, dedicated an estimated 1.7% of GDP to military expenditure last year, according to SIPRI.

    HOW DOES DEFENCE SPENDING COMPARE TO GOVERNMENT SPENDING IN OTHER AREAS?

    In NATO countries, defence tends to make up a small portion of national budgets.

    Military spending accounted for 3.2% of government spending in Italy, 3.6% in France and 8.5% in Poland in 2023, according to SIPRI data. In Russia that year, military expenditure made up nearly 19% of government spending.

    (Reuters)

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Home testing kits for lifesaving checks against cervical cancer

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments 2

    Press release

    Home testing kits for lifesaving checks against cervical cancer

    Government to offer home-testing kits as part of the cervical screening programme under its upcoming 10 Year Health Plan.

    • Under screened women to be offered convenient HPV self-sampling kits under new 10 Year Health Plan 
    • Home kits offered to those who have missed their invite, making care more convenient and supporting our shift from treatment to prevention
    • New initiative builds on NHS’ personalised approach to cervical screening

    Women and people with a cervix* across England who haven’t come forward for vital health checks will be offered home-testing kits as part of the cervical screening programme under the upcoming 10 Year Health Plan.

    The ground-breaking initiative aims to revolutionise cervical cancer prevention rates by tackling deeply entrenched barriers that keep some women away from potentially life-saving screenings, including a fear of discomfort, embarrassment, cultural sensitivities and the struggle to find time for medical appointments.  

    Women who have rarely or have never attended their cervical screening will be offered a self-sample kit to complete at home. They are then sent out in discreet packaging and returned via pre-paid mail in the local post box.  

    Participation in cervical cancer screening currently sits at just 68.8% – well below the NHS England target of 80%. This means over 5 million women in England are not up to date with their routine check-up**. But experts believe this targeted approach could increase participation in the screening programme that saves approximately 5000 lives a year across England.   

    The initiative is part of the government’s upcoming 10 Year Health Plan – due to be published in the coming weeks – which sets out how government plans to tackle the challenges facing the health service and build an NHS that is fit for the future by doing more to prevent ill health in the first place.

    Health and Social Care Secretary Wes Streeting said:   

    These self-sampling kits represent healthcare that works around people’s lives, not the other way around. They put women firmly in control of their own health, ensuring we catch more cancers at their earliest, most treatable stages.

    Our 10 Year Health Plan will fundamentally reform the NHS, shifting focus from treating illness to preventing it before it starts.

    We know the earlier cancer is diagnosed the better the chances are of survival. By making screening more convenient, we’re tackling the barriers that keep millions of women from potentially life-saving tests.

    The self-testing kits, which detect human papillomavirus (HPV), a group of viruses that can lead to cervical cancer, allow women to carry out this testing in the privacy and convenience of their own homes.  

    Michelle Kane, NHS Director of Screening, said:

    There are a number of reasons that stop some women taking up the offer of screening and we hope the introduction of self-testing will encourage more women to take up this life-saving test in a way that works for them.

    I’d encourage anyone who gets an invite for a cervical screening, either from their local GP practice or the NHS App, to attend and if you have any worrying symptoms, please contact your GP. It could save your life.

    The programme specifically targets those groups consistently missing vital appointments, with younger women, ethnic minority communities facing cultural hurdles, people with a disability and LGBT+ people all set to benefit. 

    Anyone testing positive for HPV through self-sampling will be encouraged to attend a clinician-taken follow-up cervical screening test to check for cervical cell changes. 

    Athena Lamnisos, Chief Executive, Eve Appeal, said:

    There are so many different reasons why those who are eligible aren’t responding to their cervical screening invitation letter.

    HPV self-testing will be a step change for some. Being able to do the test in their own time and following simple instructions is what many people want and need. Ensuring that the under-screened and never screened know about this new test is vital for Eve.

    As the leading gynae cancer prevention charity, we know how vital it is to address health inequalities and make sure that everyone knows that this test is available to them and why it’s important.

    Michelle Mitchell, Chief Executive of Cancer Research UK, said: 

    Screening is a powerful tool to prevent cervical cancer and save lives, but we know it isn’t always easy for everyone to take part. For some, the test may seem uncomfortable, embarrassing, or simply hard to fit into their lives. That’s why we welcome the UK government’s decision to roll out cervical cancer home screening kits in England – to help remove barriers and make cervical screening more accessible.

    The gold standard way to test for HPV is still a sample taken by a clinician and this will be suitable for most people. But beating cervical cancer means beating it for everyone, and this move helps to bring us closer to that goal.  It’s important to remember that cervical screening is for people without symptoms so, if you notice any unusual changes for you, do not wait for a screening invitation – speak to your doctor.

    This approach builds on the NHS’ recent announcement to make cervical cancer screening more personalised. From July, women aged 25-49 who test negative for HPV in a clinician-taken test will be invited for their next test in five years, rather than three, following a recommendation by the UK National Screening Committee. The programme is in line with major clinical evidence that shows if a person tests negative for HPV they are extremely unlikely to go on to develop cervical cancer within the next decade. Anyone whose sample indicates the presence of HPV will continue to be invited to more frequent screenings.  

    Digital invitations and reminders for cervical screening were also recently rolled out as part of the NHS App’s ‘ping and book’ service to make screenings even more convenient, boost uptake and save lives.  

    Through our Plan for Change, the government is cutting waiting times for cancer patients with 99,000 extra patients having had cancer diagnosed or ruled out since July than in the previous year. In February, the highest ever proportion of patients had a diagnosis or an all clear within four weeks.

    Dr Anita Lim, Chief Investigator of the YouScreen trial and Visiting Senior Research Fellow, King’s College London:

    This is a significant step forward for cervical cancer prevention and brings us closer to the NHS goal of eliminating the disease by 2040. The YouScreen trial, which provided self-sampling HPV kits to under-screen women in London, demonstrated that self-sampling could reach people who find it difficult to attend traditional screening – including those from diverse and underserved populations.

    It’s hugely positive to see this now reflected in national policy, helping more people get protected from this highly preventable cancer.

    Gem, who was diagnosed with cervical cancer in 2015, said:

    My cervical cancer was picked up during a routine screening by my GP. I was referred for surgery to remove the cancer cells, as well as lymph nodes from my abdomen and pelvis.

    It took me about six weeks to recover, and because it was caught early and hadn’t spread, I was told at my follow-up appointment that I was cancer-free and didn’t require further treatment.

    I’ve been cancer-free for years now, but I still live with the aftermath of my diagnosis. I hope that one day we live in a world where cervical cancer is eliminated. With advances in vaccines and screening, I believe that day is getting ever closer.

    For many, though, there are barriers to attending screening. Our everyday lives are busy juggling jobs, family life, and more, which can make attending appointments difficult. But feelings of embarrassment, fear, or unease can also prevent people from going.

    Making it easier for people to access screening they can do at home removes some of those barriers and will, I’m sure, save lives.

    If I hadn’t attended screening when I did, I’m certain I would have been facing a very different outcome. I will always be thankful that I went when I did and now try to use my experience to help others.

    ENDS  

    Updates to this page

    Published 24 June 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI Russia: International Congress on Business Tourism Meet Global MICE Congress to be held in Moscow in December

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: Moscow Government – Government of Moscow –

    A major international forum, Meet Global MICE Congress, will be held in the capital on December 17 and 18. This was reported by Natalia Sergunina, Deputy Mayor of Moscow. The event will bring together Russian and foreign experts in the field of business tourism, representatives of specialized companies and departments for the third time.

    The congress will be dedicated to the MICE industry, related to the organization and holding of business events.

    “15 business sessions are planned. They will cover key issues for the development of the industry – from interstate cooperation to the use of modern technologies and promotion in new markets,” noted Natalia Sergunina.

    The main topic of the first day will be interaction with government institutions of different countries and cities, and the second day – business partnership and industry initiatives. Traditionally, a cultural program will be prepared for the participants. For example, they will get to know Moscow as one of the international tourist centers.

    For the first time, the event will feature an exhibition space for Russian and foreign companies. Entrepreneurs will be able to present their proposals and hold business negotiations. Separate stands will be dedicated to the festival “Moscow Tea Party” and the project “Made in Moscow”.

    The congress will feature intensive training sessions and expert presentations in an open microphone format. Specialists will share best practices and the most successful cases.

    In 2024, the event brought together more than 1,300 representatives of the business tourism industry from Russia and 16 other countries, including Brazil, India and China.

    Get the latest news quicklyofficial telegram channel the city of Moscow.

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    Please Note; This Information is Raw Content Directly from the Information Source. It is access to What the Source Is Stating and Does Not Reflect

    https: //vv.mos.ru/nevs/ite/155733073/

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI Russia: Installation of a panel in honor of the 300th anniversary of the Russian Academy of Sciences has begun on the track walls of the Akademicheskaya metro station

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: Moscow Government – Government of Moscow –

    The installation of decorative panels made of cellular aluminum has begun on the platform section of the Akademicheskaya station of the Troitskaya metro line. They will be used to create a panel dedicated to the 300th anniversary of the Russian Academy of Sciences. This was reported by the Deputy Mayor of Moscow for Urban Development Policy and Construction Vladimir Efimov.

    “The panel at the Akademicheskaya metro station will be dedicated to science. Various artistic elements will be applied to the front side of the panels, as well as images of outstanding Russian scientists from different eras: Lavrentiy Blumentrost, Ivan Schumacher, Nikolai Semenov and Vladimir Vernadsky. To add dynamics to the overall composition, the technology of printing on aluminum honeycomb panels and digital application of images to combined panels with a glass front surface was used. The total area of the panel on the track walls exceeds 1.6 thousand square meters. Together with the finishing of the ceiling and platform portals, they will form a single composition with an area of over 5.7 thousand square meters,” Vladimir Efimov noted.

    Multilayer aluminum is actively used in underground construction, since this material is resistant to temperature effects and has high strength.

    “The installation of the panels was preceded by the assembly of an aluminum subsystem consisting of horizontal and vertical guides, which are installed using brackets on a concrete base. Such a fastening system will ensure the reliability of the entire structure and high installation speed,” said Maxim Gaman, General Director of Mosinzhproekt JSC.

    The central part of the Akademicheskaya platform will be decorated with a series of portals, the edges of which will be illuminated. These architectural elements will become the main source of illumination for the platform.

    Earlier, Sergei Sobyanin held technical launch metro section from Novatorskaya to ZIL.

    “Akademicheskaya” is being built near the intersection of Dmitry Ulyanov and Profsoyuznaya streets. It will be a shallow station with two underground vestibules, through which you can get to residential buildings, public transport stops on Dmitry Ulyanov and Grimau streets, as well as on 60th Anniversary of October Avenue. Passengers will be able to transfer to the platform of the same name on the Kaluzhsko-Rizhskaya metro line.

    Get the latest news quicklyofficial telegram channel the city of Moscow.

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    Please Note; This Information is Raw Content Directly from the Information Source. It is access to What the Source Is Stating and Does Not Reflect

    https: //vv.mos.ru/nevs/ite/155735073/

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI Russia: Moscow is a city of youth: how student brigades help to realize oneself

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: Moscow Government – Government of Moscow –

    This year, from April to August, members of Moscow student brigades work at various sites across the country. Over 500 people remained to work in the capital. During the academic year, students and schoolchildren were selected for all-Russian and interregional work projects of Russian student brigades (RSB) – they completed tasks and participated in interviews.

    “Thanks to the opportunities in the capital, young residents of the capital can realize themselves in various areas from volunteering to creativity. Moscow student brigades are an active community that works for the benefit of the entire country. More than 3.5 thousand participants of student brigades work at sites throughout Russia, master professions, gain experience and contribute to the development of the most important sectors – from education to industry,” said

    Ekaterina Dragunova, Chairman of the Committee for Public Relations and Youth Policy of the City of Moscow.

    They receive a working specialty and begin their journey into the profession

    Currently, the Moscow regional branch of the RSO has over 150 teams in eight areas. They unite over 3.5 thousand students from 80 capital universities, 30 colleges and 80 schools. In the spring, the children received free training in working specialties in order to begin their path to the profession in the summer, gain their first work experience and contribute to the development of key industries in the country.

    “Moscow student brigades are professional growth and acquisition of flexible skills, experience, a team and, of course, youthful romance. Now students and schoolchildren begin their working summer at construction sites, the railway, in hospitals, hotels, children’s camps, agricultural complexes, on the fishing season and archaeological excavations. The guys work both in the capital and throughout Russia,” said Yulia Drozhzhina, chairperson of the board of Moscow student brigades, State Duma deputy.

    More than a thousand participants in the pedagogical direction work as counselors, shift leaders and program organizers in children’s camps in the Central Federal District, Krasnodar Krai, the Republic of Crimea and Primorye.

    Over 70 people represent Moscow in major RSO work projects as part of all-Russian student teaching teams. These are Gagarin in Anapa, Okean in Vladivostok, Delfin.ru in Krasnodar Krai, Orlyonok, Krasnaya Nit and Sputnik in Rostov Oblast. Muscovites also work at the International Children’s Center Artek in Yalta. In addition, the children will become counselors as part of the district student teaching team Solnechny. Their functions include holding leisure and developmental events and creating a comfortable environment for communication and socialization of children.

    Making Reality More Interesting Than a Smartphone: Moscow Camp Counselors Talk About Children, Games, and Teaching Techniques

    In student construction teams, the guys work at city, federal and international sites. They participate in ensuring the stable functioning of city systems – in servicing the heating stations of PJSC MOEK, the electric grid complexes of PJSC Rosseti and the Moscow Metro facilities. In addition, with the assistance of the administration of the capital’s universities, the guys build dormitories of the Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba and the innovative scientific and technological center of Moscow State University “Vorobyovy Gory”.

    They work on all-Russian student construction sites and international projects

    13 capital teams have been selected for five all-Russian labor projects of the RSO, including “Peaceful Atom — Leningrad NPP” in the city of Sosnovy Bor in the Leningrad Region, where they are taking part in the construction of the Leningrad NPP-2.

    In addition, student team members perform general construction work at the all-Russian student construction sites “Peaceful Atom” in Ozersk, Chelyabinsk Region, “Peaceful Atom – Skif” in Novosibirsk, “Peaceful Atom – Breakthrough” in Seversk, Tomsk Region, “Alabuga Stroy” in Yelabuga (Republic of Tatarstan), “Siberia”, as well as in the work projects of Aeroterminal LLC in Krasnodar and “Kovykta” at the Kovykta gas condensate field in the Irkutsk Region.

    25 students represent Moscow in international projects, ensuring the operation of power plants in the Arab Republic of Egypt, including the El Dabaa Nuclear Power Plant (NPP), as well as in the Republic of Bangladesh at the Rooppur NPP.

    Moscow student teams completed internships in more than 40 cities in RussiaSergei Sobyanin spoke about the work of Moscow student brigades

    They look after patients, work as orderlies and nurses

    The number of participants in medical teams is growing every year. Students from the capital’s famous medical universities provide support to the country’s healthcare system during the summer – they look after patients, work as orderlies and nurses in institutions throughout Russia.

    This year, in Moscow, they are working at the N.V. Sklifosovsky Research Institute of Emergency Care, the private healthcare institution “RZhD-Medicine Clinical Hospital named after N.A. Semashko”. Nine medical teams have been selected for all-Russian projects. From July, they will work in healthcare institutions on Sakhalin Island, Novosibirsk, Novokuznetsk, Chelyabinsk, Barnaul, Perm, Irkutsk and Tomsk, as well as in the Valeo district project in the Voronezh Region.

    Provide comfortable passenger transportation and service

    More than 200 participants in the conductor program ensure safe and comfortable passenger transportation on long-distance trains in the structural divisions of JSC Federal Passenger Company (Moscow-Kyiv and Nikolaevka). During trips, students control the placement of passengers according to tickets and serve them along the way, supervise safe boarding and disembarking on platforms, and monitor the technical condition of the carriage.

    This year, three student conductors became leaders of the all-Russian labor projects “Moscow” and “Adler”. Miron Ganichev from the student conductor team “Sinoger” based at the Russian State Agrarian University – Moscow Agricultural Academy named after K.A. Timiryazev took the position of instructor at the passenger car depot “Moscow-Kyiv”. Before each trip, he instructs students on labor protection and fire safety while working on the train.

    Participants in the service direction work as waiters, maids, lifeguards, bartenders, administrators and animators in hotels and sanatoriums on the Black Sea coast as part of the All-Russian student service teams “Sochi Park Hotel” in the city of Sochi, “Gelendzhik” in the city of the same name, “More” in Crimea.

    The “Runway” project in St. Petersburg allowed the children to become escorts for passengers with limited mobility, call center operators, inform passengers about airport services, clean aircraft cabins – raise seat backs, armrests and lay out blankets.

    For the first time this year, students began working at passenger check-in desks and became baggage handlers at Vnukovo Airport. On the Sapsan and Lastochka trains on the Moscow-St. Petersburg route, they hold the positions of waiter-stewards and serve passengers on high-speed trains. In addition, the guys work as waiters in the business lounges of Paveletsky and Kazansky railway stations in the center of the capital.

    They get jobs in admissions offices of universities and work in agriculture

    Another area of activity of service teams is administrative work at Moscow universities. Thus, students work in admissions committees of universities. They receive documents from applicants, form lists of applicants, draw up schedules for conducting entrance examinations and participate in summing up the results of the admissions campaign.

    Agricultural sector participants are involved in harvesting crops, working with cattle and poultry as veterinarians, livestock technicians, laboratory technicians, and much more.

    For example, this year students are participating in a large all-Russian project to harvest apples on the territory of OOO Agronom-Sad in Lipetsk Oblast and are being employed as winegrowers at AO Divnomorye in Krasnodar Krai.

    Students majoring in animal husbandry — veterinarians, zootechnicians, technologists and biologists — will try themselves at subsidiaries of the EkoNiva group of companies in the Voronezh region, at enterprises of the Damate group of companies in the Rostov region and at branches of Stavropolsky Broiler LLC.

    From July 1, members of the fishing teams will go to student fishing seasons in the Kamchatka and Khabarovsk regions as fish processors, caviar fishermen and short-distance fishing sailors.

    Moscow to open 65th summer work season of student teams

    They are on duty at MCC, MCD stations and railway stations

    This year, schoolchildren aged 14 to 17 years old, as part of the adolescent work teams, will work as hall attendants at the stations of the Moscow Central Circle, Moscow Central Diameters, and as attendants at the capital’s railway stations.

    For the first time this year, Moscow teenagers’ work teams were selected for the all-Russian work project “Alabuga TOP” in Yelabuga (Republic of Tatarstan). There they will become office managers for receiving and processing incoming calls in the office, and will clean residential premises and public places.

    More detailed information about the activities of Moscow student teams can be found in the community VKontakte or intelegram channel. You can learn more about the opportunities for young residents of the capital on the portal “Youth of Moscow” and in social networks project.

    Moscow is a city of youth. The capital offers wide opportunities for its development, creative self-expression, comfortable life and interesting leisure. It has a developed infrastructure, thousands of events of different scale and focus are held here.

    In honor of Youth Day, themed events will be held at more than 250 city venues. The flagship event will be the festival, which will take place on June 28 and 29 at Bolotnaya Square.

    You can find more detailed information and a map with all city events on the portal “Youth of Moscow”.

    Moscow student teams took part in the action “Snow landing of the RSO. Victory landing”From a conductor to a counselor: who can work in Moscow student groups

    Get the latest news quicklyofficial telegram channel the city of Moscow.

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    Please Note; This Information is Raw Content Directly from the Information Source. It is access to What the Source Is Stating and Does Not Reflect

    https: //vv.mos.ru/nevs/ite/155748073/

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI Africa: Deputy President to speak at G20 youth roundtable in Johannesburg

    Source: South Africa News Agency

    Deputy President to speak at G20 youth roundtable in Johannesburg

    Deputy President Paul Mashatile will address the high-level Group of 20 (G20) intergenerational roundtable hosted by the National Youth Development Agency (NYDA) on Friday in Johannesburg. 

    The roundtable is part of South Africa’s G20 Presidency and will focus on promoting equity, enhancing capabilities, and fostering innovation.

    The Deputy President’s Office announced that the upcoming gathering will bring together youth activists, professionals, international partners and policymakers. 

    The focus of the event will be to discuss inclusive development pathways and generational equity.

    The roundtable will include high-level contributions from Cabinet members, industry leaders, continental development partners, and representatives from civil society.

    “The engagement also aims to amplify youth voices in shaping national and global development agendas, while accelerating opportunities for their meaningful inclusion in economic, governance, and innovation ecosystems,” said the Presidency.

    In line with the priorities of the G20 Presidency, Deputy President Mashatile will discuss the importance of building youth capabilities for a developmental state. 

    He will address the structural barriers that young people face and promote government-led solutions through collaborative policy instruments, such as the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA).

    In addition, his talk will emphasise the need for strategic investments in education, innovation, and inclusive growth.

    “This roundtable engagement, which advances the development and empowerment of the county’s young people, falls within the ambit of the Deputy President’s responsibility as the Chairperson of the Human Resource Development Council,” the statement read. – SAnews.gov.za

    Gabisile

    MIL OSI Africa

  • MIL-OSI China: China mulls law to improve social assistance system

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    China mulls law to improve social assistance system

    Xinhua | June 24, 2025

    Chinese lawmakers are reviewing a draft law designed to ensure basic living support for people in need.

    The draft law on social assistance was submitted on Tuesday to the ongoing session of the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress, the national legislature, for its first reading.

    The draft expands the scope of social assistance and strengthens its role as a safety net for those in need.

    It calls for primary-level authorities to actively monitor the living conditions of residents and to provide timely assistance in accordance with the law.

    The draft also calls for establishing and enhancing mechanisms to encourage broader participation of citizens, legal entities, and other organizations in providing social assistance. 

    MIL OSI China News

  • MIL-OSI Russia: Students of SPbGASU became volunteers and participants of the youth program of the St. Petersburg Economic Forum

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: Saint Petersburg State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering – Saint Petersburg State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering – Irina Peretokin

    Students of SPbGASU became volunteers of the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum (SPIEF) and participants of the youth program “Day of the Future”, which took place on June 21.

    More than eight thousand people took part in the events of the SPIEF youth program, 37 sessions were held. This platform was visited by representatives of about 220 universities and about 60 scientific organizations.

    Volunteer helpers

    Anna Kozhemyak and Irina Peretokin (both second-year students of the construction faculty) were included in the forum’s volunteer corps and worked at the event from June 18 to 21.

    “I was able to participate in the forum thanks to a competitive selection. After submitting applications, we completed online training to learn about the main working aspects of the forum. Then we took an exam in the RANEPA building with questions in Russian and English, as well as a short oral survey. As a result, I managed to get into the business contacts exchange team, the main goal of which is to help participants organize business meetings.

    The experience of working in this area is incredibly useful. Every day is different from the previous one, the schedule is tight, the tasks are responsible, but thanks to the coordinated work of our team, everything went great! SPIEF is a huge productive mechanism, and it was a great honor for me to contribute to its work,” said Anna Kozhemyak.

    Authors of the grant project

    Third-year students of the Faculty of Forensic Expertise and Law in Construction and Transport Daria Meleshina, Egor Kolobov and Ruslan Kafarov as a team of the educational project “InfoShield” became participants of the youth program “Day of the Future”. The project was among the winners of the competition “Rosmolodezh. Grants”.

    As part of the forum, the guys also attended thematic events, including the session “Cyber fraud as a tool of information warfare. A new look at digital threats and public security” with the participation of experts, journalists and bloggers. The project team interviewed the discussion participants and recorded a podcast for the educational project “InfoShield”. The first episodes will be released soon, which can be seen in the group HTTPS: //t. TA/Infoard_gasu

    “Our project is dedicated to digital security and legal education of schoolchildren in grades eight to eleven. We want to teach teenagers to recognize online threats, know their digital rights, and understand where to turn for help. As part of the project, we hold lectures and interactive classes at our university and in schools in St. Petersburg, prepare podcasts with the participation of experts in cybersecurity and law, and an Olympiad with cases on safe behavior on the Internet. In this way, we confirm in practice that students can really influence important processes and launch socially significant initiatives. The forum allowed young people to discuss important topics, share their projects, and communicate with experts. I have many new ideas for further work,” said Daria.

    “Active participation of students in social projects and creative activities plays a very important role, contributing to their personal growth and helping them to form social connections,” noted Ekaterina Kovalenko, Deputy Head of the Youth Policy Department at SPbGASU.

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI: Bulletin from the Extraordinary General Meeting of ZetaDisplay AB (publ)

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    The following resolutions were passed at the Extraordinary General Meeting (the “EGM”) of ZetaDisplay AB (publ) on 23 June 2025.

    Board of Directors
    The Extraordinary General Meeting resolved to dismiss board member Matthew Peacock and to elect Rob Woodward as a new board member. The remaining board members were re-elected for the period until the next Annual General Meeting.

    For further information, please contact:
    Anders Olin, President and CEO, ZetaDisplay AB (publ)
    Mobile: +46 761-01 14 88
    E-Mail: anders.olin@zetadisplay.com

    Claes Pedersen, CFO, ZetaDisplay AB (publ)
    Mobile: +45 23 68 86 58
    E-Mail: claes.pedersen@zetadisplay.com

    Robert Bryhn, CMO / Head of Communication, ZetaDisplay AB (publ)
    Mobile: +46 709-80 20 80
    E-Mail: robert.bryhn@zetadisplay.com

    Attachment

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: ‘Burn, baby, burn’: Trump and Meloni’s toxic alliance staged in offshore fossil gas protest

    Source: Greenpeace Statement –

    Ravenna, Italy – As Italy and much of Europe are entering the heatwave season with scorching temperatures already being recorded, 12 activists from seven countries are taking action with Greenpeace Italy against climate-wrecking fossil gas at the new liquefied gas import terminal of Ravenna. At sea, activists reached the infrastructure and attached large banners on it reading “Burn, baby, burn” referencing President Trump’s mantra “Drill, baby, drill” alongside an image of a burning Earth flanked by the faces of US President Donald Trump and Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni.

    Photos and videos are available in the Greenpeace Media Library.

    At the same time, activists are protesting in kayaks holding a road sign depicting the choice EU leaders need to take between climate hell and a fossil-free future. The action targets Italy’s recent pledge to increase imports of liquefied fossil gas from the US. An alliance that deepens Europe’s fossil fuel dependence and vulnerability to political blackmail from Trump.[1]

    Federico Spadini, climate and energy campaigner at Greenpeace Italy said: “While the country scorches under record heat, Meloni chooses to side with Trump and sabotage Italy’s climate action. This toxic alliance puts Italy’s energy future in the hands of Trump and locks the country further into a dangerous gas dependency that fuels the climate crisis, drives up our energy bills and turns our homes into ovens.” 

    Italy is reportedly Europe’s fourth largest importer of liquefied fossil gas with Qatar and the US being the primary suppliers. Despite the fact that liquefied gas (LNG) imports fell by 12% in 2024 according to the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis (IEEFA), the Italian government has pushed for additional LNG import capacity with the new gas import terminal (FSRU) in Ravenna which started operations earlier this year.[2] The protest also comes in the middle of the Greenpeace campaign against oil and gas giants like the Italian ENI, the same company that launched a Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation (SLAPP) targeting Greenpeace Italy, Greenpeace Netherlands and Italian NGO ReCommon.[3]

    “While Meloni is making dirty deals with Trump, ENI threatens to silence those who dare to speak out and advocate for a renewable energy future—putting profit before people, and deepening a toxic pattern of repression and fossil fuel dependence,” added Spadini.

    Accelerating the transition to renewable energy is not only an environmental imperative; it is a matter of security, said campaigner Lisa Göldner, who is currently on board the Greenpeace ship Arctic Sunrise on an expedition across Europe to expose the risks of fossil gas and to mobilise for a fossil-free energy future.[4]

    Lisa Göldner, Greenpeace Germany campaigner with the European Fossil-Free Future campaign said: “Every new gas import terminal, every new fossil gas purchase agreement is locking Europe further into a gas trap that threatens Europe’s security and independence. Fossil gas fuels the climate crisis and geopolitical conflict and makes Europe vulnerable to political blackmail. The EU must break free from its fossil fuel dependency and take control of its future by investing in a renewable, secure and peaceful energy system.”

    “Rather than weakening methane regulations and handing a ‘free pass’ to US gas, as is currently being considered, EU leaders have to up their game: agree on a full phase-out of fossil gas by 2035 at the latest and ban all new fossil fuel projects in the EU.”[5]

    Greenpeace is calling for a phase-out of fossil gas through a transition to renewable energy that allows everyone to meet their energy needs at a decent price, without harming people, the planet or the environment.

    ENDS

    Photos and videos are available in the Greenpeace Media Library.

    Notes

    [1] United States – Italy joint leader’s statement, 17 April 2025.

    [2] IEEFA: European LNG Tracker, “Italy’s incentive scheme for gas investment must confront falling demand”

    [3] ENI Strikes Again: A Textbook Environmental SLAPP | CASE

    [4] Last weekend the Greenpeace ship Arctic Sunrise was anchored in Venice where 650 people visited the ship and took action to stop fossil gas. On Monday, activists from the UK action group Everyone hates Elon and Greenpeace Italy took action in Venice just days before the high-profile wedding of billionaire Jeff Bezos. Greenpeace Italy’s protests this week are denouncing billionaire and corporate greed, as well as toxic political alliances and fossil fuel expansion – all of which are driving humanity deeper into climate chaos. 

    Today’s protest took place as Greenpeace’s Fossil-Free Future campaign carries out its ‘Stop Fossil Gas’ expedition across Europe. This year, the campaign is visiting several European countries aboard the iconic Arctic Sunrise to spark debate about Europe’s energy system; question its dependence on fossil gas; and promote a just and fair phase-out of fossil gas through a transition to renewable energy that allows everyone to meet their energy needs at a decent price, without harming people, the planet or the environment. Greenpeace is gathering support for a ban on all new fossil gas -and fossil fuel- infrastructure projects in the EU. The Fossil-Free Future campaign’s Open Letter to the EU and national governments has already gathered 80.000 signatures.

    [5] Scientists urge EU to resist methane lobbying | Sustainable Views

    Contacts

    Manon Laudy, Press Officer, Fossil-Free Future Campaign, Greenpeace Netherlands, +336 49 15 69 83, [email protected]

    Greenpeace International Press Desk, +31 (0)20 718 2470 (available 24 hours), [email protected]

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Coleraine Petty Vandalism Cannot Erase Sacrifice

    Source: Traditional Unionist Voice – Northern Ireland

    Statement by TUV vice chairman and Causeway councillor Allister Kyle:

    “It is deeply disappointing to learn that a memorial stone, laid in honour of those young men from our shores who served in the 36th Ulster Division, has been stolen — an act of malice carried out by individuals styling themselves as “Republican Youth.”

    “The sacrifice made in the First World War was not the preserve of Protestant or Unionists alone — many Catholic Nationalists also answered the call and gave their lives in that great conflict, particularly in the 16th Irish Division which drew many of its soldiers from Redmond’s Nationalist Volunteers which fought alongside those commemorated by the memorial stone at Messines in June 1917.

    “This memorial was a modest tribute, placed respectfully by Killowen Lodge on its own private grounds. It posed no threat, no provocation, and no reason for offence.

    “Basic decency would demand that respect be shown to those who paid the ultimate price — regardless of the political lens through which you view the past.

    “I would urge anyone with information about this act of desecration to come forward, either to the PSNI or, if they feel more comfortable, to contact me directly in confidence. I will ensure the information is passed on.

    “Those behind this disgraceful act may have enjoyed a momentary thrill by trying to wound a community’s memory — but all they have truly done is expose their own narrow-mindedness.

    “I have no doubt that the memorial will be restored. And when it is, it will stand all the taller — as a lasting reminder that some gave their all, while others can only lash out in petty vandalism.”

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Foster + Partners to design national memorial to Queen Elizabeth II

    Source: United Kingdom – Government Statements

    Press release

    Foster + Partners to design national memorial to Queen Elizabeth II

    Foster + Partners is the winner out of five finalists in a competition to design the national memorial to Queen Elizabeth II in St James’ Park

    • Their design proposal was selected from a shortlist of five concepts by acclaimed teams.
    • Includes a new bridge inspired by the late Queen’s wedding tiara, a Prince Philip Gate and new gardens.
    • Final plans for the memorial in St James’ Park will be announced next year.

    Foster + Partners has won the competition to design the national memorial to Queen Elizabeth II.

    Five finalist teams were asked to create a masterplan that would honour and celebrate Queen Elizabeth’s extraordinary life of service and provide the public with a space for reflection.

    Foster + Partners’ winning design concept celebrates Queen Elizabeth’s life through a time of great change, balancing tradition and modernity, public duty and private faith, the United Kingdom and a global Commonwealth. The design concept illustrates how she brought these dualities together: two gates, two gardens, joined by a bridge and unifying path.

    Foster + Partners’ design concept features figurative sculptures and a new Prince Philip Gate. It also features gardens – dedicated to the Commonwealth and the communities of the United Kingdom – to create spaces for reflection and coming together. Artistic installations will celebrate the nation’s diversity. A new bridge, replacing the existing Blue Bridge, will feature a cast-glass balustrade that recalls Queen Elizabeth’s wedding tiara.

    This design concept will be subject to change as it undergoes refining.

    The Queen Elizabeth Memorial Committee’s selection panel found Foster + Partners’, design, balancing formal and informal elements, impressive and capable of creating an engaging landmark to endure for generations to come. The panel also valued Foster + Partners’ artistry, use of space, technical skills and their sensitivity to the memorial’s location.

    The winning team includes artist Yinka Shonibare and celebrated landscape designer, Michel Desvigne.

    Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster Pat McFadden said:

    Queen Elizabeth II was admired around the globe. Foster + Partners’ fantastic design concept will be a beautiful memorial to Her life and legacy of public service. Situated in the heart of our capital, it will be a space to reflect on and celebrate our longest reigning Monarch for centuries to come.

    The panel selected Foster + Partners’ design concept from a shortlist of proposals by five leading multidisciplinary teams. During the competition the public were encouraged to give their views on the design concepts to commemorate the UK’s longest reigning Monarch. 

    The Committee also consulted experts in arts, heritage, architecture, structural engineering, placemaking and accessibility to find the best concept to honour Queen Elizabeth.

    Committee Chair Robin Janvrin said:

    Selecting the winner was no easy task. All five of the shortlisted teams produced creative designs of the highest quality. 

    Foster + Partners’ ambitious and thoughtful masterplan will allow us and future generations to appreciate Queen Elizabeth’s life of service as she balanced continuity and change with strong values, common sense and optimism throughout her long reign.  

    Committee member Valerie Amos said:

    Foster + Partners’ design brings to life Queen Elizabeth’s many contributions to the lives of people across the United Kingdom and the Commonwealth. Their ambitious design will create a beautiful space for people to come together, reflect on her legacy and share stories for generations to come.

    Founder and Executive Chairman of Foster + Partners Norman Foster said:

    It is an honour and a privilege for our team to be awarded this project. Her Majesty loved history and tradition, so this is reflected in the inspiration of the original design of St James’s Park by Sir John Nash. Some of his principles have survived, whilst others have been lost and will be restored, creating a family of gardens joined by gently meandering paths.

    I knew The Queen on formal occasions but also enjoyed her informality when attending events as a member of the Order of Merit. We have sought to reflect these qualities of the formal and informal in our design, with an appeal across a wide range of ages and interests. To these ends, we have discreetly stretched the boundaries of art and technology with a deliberately gentle intervention. Our design will have the minimum impact on the nature and biodiversity of the Park and it will be phased to ensure that the precious route across it will never be closed.

    At the heart of our masterplan is a translucent bridge symbolic of Her Majesty as a unifying force, bringing together nations, countries, the Commonwealth, charities and the armed forces.

    Foster + Partners will now develop its initial concept in close partnership with the Queen Elizabeth Memorial Committee. They will work together to select a sculptor to design the memorial’s figurative element. The Committee will announce the sculptor later this year. 

    The memorial will be located in St James’s Park, an area of historical and constitutional significance, which also has a personal connection to Queen Elizabeth II. It will include an area of the Park adjacent to The Mall at Marlborough Gate, an area adjacent to Bird Cage Walk and replace the existing bridge between the two with a new crossing.

    The final design will be formally announced in April 2026, alongside a legacy programme, to coincide with what would have been Queen Elizabeth’s hundredth birthday year.

    Updates to this page

    Published 24 June 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI Russia: Sergei Sobyanin congratulated a schoolgirl who passed the Unified State Exam with the maximum 400 points

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: Moscow Government – Government of Moscow –

    Moscow schoolgirl Nadezhda Yashmolkina scored the maximum 400 points on the Unified State Exam. Sergei Sobyanin reported this in his telegram channel.

    “The girl plans to make a career in IT. Now she is choosing between HSE, Moscow State University and Baumanka. I am sure that every university will be happy to have such a student, and in the future – any Moscow company. I sincerely congratulate Nadya, her teachers and parents, I wish her good luck!” – wrote the Mayor of Moscow.

    Source: Sergei Sobyanin’s Telegram channel @mos_sobyanin.

    The graduate of school #1514 received the highest score in each of four subjects: Russian language, specialized mathematics, computer science and physics. During the year, she also won six specialized Olympiads and participated in the final stages of the All-Russian School Olympiad in Mathematics and Computer Science.

    The main period of the Unified State Exam will end in early July, and then the final results will be announced. But right now, only Nadezhda has such an outstanding result in the country – 100 points in all subjects.

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    Please Note; This Information is Raw Content Directly from the Information Source. It is access to What the Source Is Stating and Does Not Reflect

    https: //vv.mos.ru/mayor/tkhemes/12992050/

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • Govt to launch ‘NAVYA’ to empower adolescent girls through vocational training

    Source: Government of India

    Source: Government of India (4)

    In a major step toward advancing women-led development under the Viksit Bharat@2047 vision, the central government is set to launch NAVYA – Nurturing Aspirations through Vocational Training for Young Adolescent Girls today in Sonbhadra, Uttar Pradesh. The initiative marks a joint pilot programme by the Ministry of Women and Child Development (MWCD) and the Ministry of Skill Development and Entrepreneurship (MSDE), aimed at empowering adolescent girls through targeted vocational training.

    The launch ceremony will be graced by Jayant Chaudhary, Minister of State (Independent Charge) for Skill Development and Entrepreneurship, and Savitri Thakur, Minister of State for Women and Child Development. NAVYA aims to empower adolescent girls aged 16 to 18 years, who have completed at least Class 10, by providing them with vocational training—particularly in non-traditional job roles—opening up pathways to participate in emerging sectors of the economy.

    The pilot programme will initially be implemented across 27 districts in 19 states, with a focus on aspirational districts and those in the North-Eastern region. This strategic rollout underscores the government’s commitment to inclusive development and reaching underserved and vulnerable populations.

    As part of the initiative, both ministries will formalize a framework for institutional convergence, aligning efforts to deliver integrated skill training to adolescent girls. NAVYA will draw on the strengths of established national schemes, including the Pradhan Mantri Kaushal Vikas Yojana (PMKVY), to ensure the delivery of high-quality vocational education.

    The launch event will feature interactions with participating girl trainees and the distribution of certificates under PMKVY and the PM Vishwakarma scheme. The programme aims not only to enhance employability but also to instill confidence and ambition among young girls, enabling them to play a vital role in shaping India’s socio-economic future.

  • MIL-OSI Europe: President Erdoğan to Visit the Netherlands

    Source: Republic of Turkey

    President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan will pay a visit to the Netherlands on June 24-25, 2025 to attend the NATO Heads of State and Government Summit to be held in The Hague.
    Strategic views on threats and risks to the Europe-Atlantic geography will be addressed at the Summit, whose main agenda will be a new Defense Investment Pledge aimed at increasing the allies’ defense spending to a level required by the current security environment. The Alliance’s efforts in the areas of defense of deterrence in the face of the fundamental threats determined by NATO will be discussed at the Summit as well.
    President Erdoğan is expected to hold bilateral meetings with some of the participating heads of state and government on the sidelines of the Summit.
    Respectfully announced to the public.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Russia: “Summer in a New Format”: Moscow’s Employment Service Prepares a Program for Children

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: Moscow Government – Government of Moscow –

    The capital will host a unique career guidance program for teenagers for the seventh time “Summer in a new format” city employment service. 3.5 thousand schoolchildren will join it. This was reported by the head of the Moscow employment service and the center “Professions of the Future” Andrey Tarasov.

    “Moscow is developing various mechanisms for career guidance. The city’s employment service is holding the first stage of a comprehensive career guidance program for ninth-graders at the Professions of the Future center. Another important project is summer employment for our schoolchildren. This is a unique opportunity for children to spend time productively and earn their first money. We pay special attention to teenagers from large, foster and single-parent families, from families in difficult life situations, as well as children of participants in a special military operation. This year, 3.5 thousand young Muscovites will take part in the events. They will attend about 200 lectures, master classes, trainings and excursions. More than 500 major enterprises, as well as leading colleges and universities of the capital are partners of the Summer in a New Format program. Over the entire period of the program’s existence, more than 16.5 thousand people have joined it,” said Andrei Tarasov.

    The Summer in a New Format program includes three projects: Summer of My Career, PROHeroes, and Internships.

    Master a new profession and earn your first money

    The Summer of My Career project begins on July 10. All teenagers in the capital can take part in it. The kids will be offered to choose one of the specialized schools in 30 areas. This year, new specialties have appeared: fashion designer-stylist, barista, pastry chef and logistician.

    The training will be held in two shifts every day, except Saturday and Sunday. To become a participant in the project, you must sign up for website.

    Project “PROHeroes” will introduce young Muscovites from family centers to heroic professions in the areas of “Rescuers”, “Aviation” and “Motorsport”. Teenagers will visit the State Budgetary Institution “System 112”, fire and rescue teams, try themselves in the roles of air traffic controllers, pilots and aircraft designers, and will be able to practice on flight simulators.

    This year’s new direction is “Moscow Transport”. The children will be told about the professions in demand in this area, introduced to the specifics of working in the urban passenger transport system and taught driving techniques on simulators of a metro electric train, tram, bus and electric bus at the corporate university of the transport complex.

    The events of the PROHeroes project will be held in two streams: from June 23 to July 16 and from July 28 to August 22.

    Summer project “Internships” will allow the pupils of family centers, teenagers from single-parent, large and low-income families, children of participants in a special military operation to earn their first money. They will be able to undergo practical training in state institutions and leading companies in Moscow, acquire basic skills in in-demand professions.

    The recruitment is carried out by the capital’s family centers and the Unified Center for Support of SVO Participants and Their Family Members. The institutions’ specialists will support future interns at all stages – from preparing a package of documents to signing contracts.

    The internships will be held in three streams from June 16 to August 8. Upon successful completion, the students will receive a cash stipend.

    Sports, entertainment, recreation and new friends: how children can spend their holidays in MoscowDuring the holidays, Moscow schoolchildren will master the basics of sailing

    The Moscow City Employment Service is the largest state personnel operator that helps residents of the capital find work. Its structure includes employment offices, many of which are located in the My Documents government service centers. The flagship centers are open at the following addresses: Kuusinen Street, Building 2, Building 1, and Shabolovka Street, Building 48. The specialized employment center My Career is located on Sergiya Radonezhskogo Street (Building 1, Building 1).

    At the Professions of the Future center (38 Shchepkina Street, Building 1), you can master one of 75 in-demand professions in various sectors of the economy in a maximum of three and a half months. Career mentors will help you find a job after completing your training. The center’s partners include more than three thousand employers. In addition, a comprehensive career guidance program is being implemented here for ninth-grade students.

    Get the latest news quicklyofficial telegram channel the city of Moscow.

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    Please Note; This Information is Raw Content Directly from the Information Source. It is access to What the Source Is Stating and Does Not Reflect

    https: //vv.mos.ru/nevs/ite/155740073/

    MIL OSI Russia News