Category: Politics

  • MIL-OSI: PMGC Holdings Inc. Signs Letter of Intent to Acquire Profitable U.S.-Based AS9100D & ISO 9001:2015 Certified CNC Machine Shop Serving Aerospace, Defense, and Industrial Markets for over 35 years

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    • Acquisition Target Specializes in Precision Milling, Turning, Mold Manufacturing, and Specialty Metals Expertise Serving Aerospace, Defense, and Industrial Markets
    • This is PMGC’s third pending acquisition since April of 2025, demonstrating that its M&A strategy is well underway, with additional deals expected this year.
    • PMGC Sees Significant Opportunity in Acquiring Additional US based CNC and Precision Manufacturing Companies Serving Aerospace, Industrial, and Defense Markets.

    NEWPORT BEACH, Calif., June 16, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — PMGC Holdings Inc. (Nasdaq: ELAB) (the “Company,” “PMGC,” “we,” or “us”), a diversified public holding company, is pleased to announce the signing of a non-binding Letter of Intent (“LOI”) to acquire a California-based, cash-flow positive computer numerical control (“CNC”) machining company with over 35 years of operational history.

    About the Target Company

    The Target company (“Target”) is an established CNC machining business specializing in precision milling and turning, mold manufacturing, and working with exotic metals such as titanium and Inconel. The company holds AS9100D and ISO 9001:2015 certifications—two of the most widely used international quality standards in manufacturing—commonly required by major aerospace and defense contractors and leading industrial manufacturers.

    Target serves customers across the aerospace, defense, space, commercial, and industrial sectors. Despite having no formal sales team or marketing budget, Target has developed long-standing customer relationships through repeat business and referrals, which the Company believes reflects Target’s reputation for quality and trust.

    Target generated approximately $1.4 million in revenue and $215,000 in adjusted EBITDA in 2024.

    Strategic Rationale

    PMGC believes the potential acquisition of Target fits squarely within PMGC’s strategy of acquiring U.S.-based, cash-flow-positive manufacturing businesses with strong fundamentals and growth potential. The Target stands out to the Company for its high-quality and longstanding customer base, advanced technical capabilities, and consistent demand across critical industries. PMGC also believes in the strategic benefit this potential acquisition may provide, given its view that recent geopolitical dynamics and supply chain vulnerabilities may accelerate a national effort to rebuilding American manufacturing capabilities. Federal legislation—including the CHIPS and Science Act and the Inflation Reduction Act—is investing funds in to promote onshoring, innovation, and industrial independence. The Company believes that manufacturers with AS9100D and ISO 9001:2015 certifications, such as the Target are well-positioned to benefit, as these credentials are often mandatory for work with Department of Defense programs, NASA contracts, and major aerospace original equipment manufacturers. The Company believes that demand for qualified U.S.-based suppliers is rising as defense and industrial clients prioritize secure, high-quality, domestic partners.

    “This acquisition reflects our continued commitment to acquiring specialized, resilient businesses that operate at the highest standards,” said Graydon Bensler, Chief Executive Officer of PMGC Holdings Inc. “With its reliable certifications, niche capabilities in specialty metals, and trusted relationships across critical industries, this company adds both operational depth and strategic relevance to our portfolio.”

    The closing of this anticipated acquisition is subject to customary conditions, including completion of due diligence, certain corporate approvals, and execution and delivery of definitive documentation. We cannot assure that closing of the acquisition will occur.

    About PMGC Holdings Inc.

    PMGC Holdings Inc. is a diversified holding company that manages and grows its portfolio through strategic acquisitions, investments, and development across various industries. Currently, our portfolio consists of three wholly owned subsidiaries: Northstrive Biosciences Inc., PMGC Research Inc., and PMGC Capital LLC. We are committed to exploring opportunities in multiple sectors to maximize growth and value. For more information, please visit https://www.pmgcholdings.com.

    Forward-Looking Statements

    Statements contained in this press release regarding matters that are not historical facts are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, as amended. Words such as “believes,” “expects,” “plans,” “potential,” “would” and “future” or similar expressions such as “look forward” are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are made as of the date of this press release and are neither historical facts nor assurances of future performance. Instead, they are based only on our current beliefs, expectations and assumptions regarding the future of our business, future plans and strategies, projections, anticipated events and trends, the economy, activities of regulators and future regulations and other future conditions. Because forward-looking statements relate to the future, they are subject to inherent uncertainties, risks and changes in circumstances that are difficult to predict and many of which are outside of our control. Although the Company believes that the expectations expressed in these forward-looking statements are reasonable, it cannot assure you that such expectations will turn out to be correct, and the Company cautions investors that actual results may differ materially from the anticipated results. Therefore, you should not rely on any of these forward-looking statements. These and other risks are described more fully in PMGC Holdings’ filings with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), including the “Risk Factors” section of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024, filed with the SEC on March 28, 2025, and its other documents subsequently filed with or furnished to the SEC. Investors and security holders are urged to read these documents free of charge on the SEC’s web site at www.sec.gov. All forward-looking statements contained in this press release speak only as of the date on which they were made. Except to the extent required by law, the Company undertakes no obligation to update such statements to reflect events that occur or circumstances that exist after the date on which they were made.

    IR Contact:

    IR@pmgcholdings.com

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI: PMGC Holdings Inc. Signs Letter of Intent to Acquire Profitable U.S.-Based AS9100D & ISO 9001:2015 Certified CNC Machine Shop Serving Aerospace, Defense, and Industrial Markets for over 35 years

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    • Acquisition Target Specializes in Precision Milling, Turning, Mold Manufacturing, and Specialty Metals Expertise Serving Aerospace, Defense, and Industrial Markets
    • This is PMGC’s third pending acquisition since April of 2025, demonstrating that its M&A strategy is well underway, with additional deals expected this year.
    • PMGC Sees Significant Opportunity in Acquiring Additional US based CNC and Precision Manufacturing Companies Serving Aerospace, Industrial, and Defense Markets.

    NEWPORT BEACH, Calif., June 16, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — PMGC Holdings Inc. (Nasdaq: ELAB) (the “Company,” “PMGC,” “we,” or “us”), a diversified public holding company, is pleased to announce the signing of a non-binding Letter of Intent (“LOI”) to acquire a California-based, cash-flow positive computer numerical control (“CNC”) machining company with over 35 years of operational history.

    About the Target Company

    The Target company (“Target”) is an established CNC machining business specializing in precision milling and turning, mold manufacturing, and working with exotic metals such as titanium and Inconel. The company holds AS9100D and ISO 9001:2015 certifications—two of the most widely used international quality standards in manufacturing—commonly required by major aerospace and defense contractors and leading industrial manufacturers.

    Target serves customers across the aerospace, defense, space, commercial, and industrial sectors. Despite having no formal sales team or marketing budget, Target has developed long-standing customer relationships through repeat business and referrals, which the Company believes reflects Target’s reputation for quality and trust.

    Target generated approximately $1.4 million in revenue and $215,000 in adjusted EBITDA in 2024.

    Strategic Rationale

    PMGC believes the potential acquisition of Target fits squarely within PMGC’s strategy of acquiring U.S.-based, cash-flow-positive manufacturing businesses with strong fundamentals and growth potential. The Target stands out to the Company for its high-quality and longstanding customer base, advanced technical capabilities, and consistent demand across critical industries. PMGC also believes in the strategic benefit this potential acquisition may provide, given its view that recent geopolitical dynamics and supply chain vulnerabilities may accelerate a national effort to rebuilding American manufacturing capabilities. Federal legislation—including the CHIPS and Science Act and the Inflation Reduction Act—is investing funds in to promote onshoring, innovation, and industrial independence. The Company believes that manufacturers with AS9100D and ISO 9001:2015 certifications, such as the Target are well-positioned to benefit, as these credentials are often mandatory for work with Department of Defense programs, NASA contracts, and major aerospace original equipment manufacturers. The Company believes that demand for qualified U.S.-based suppliers is rising as defense and industrial clients prioritize secure, high-quality, domestic partners.

    “This acquisition reflects our continued commitment to acquiring specialized, resilient businesses that operate at the highest standards,” said Graydon Bensler, Chief Executive Officer of PMGC Holdings Inc. “With its reliable certifications, niche capabilities in specialty metals, and trusted relationships across critical industries, this company adds both operational depth and strategic relevance to our portfolio.”

    The closing of this anticipated acquisition is subject to customary conditions, including completion of due diligence, certain corporate approvals, and execution and delivery of definitive documentation. We cannot assure that closing of the acquisition will occur.

    About PMGC Holdings Inc.

    PMGC Holdings Inc. is a diversified holding company that manages and grows its portfolio through strategic acquisitions, investments, and development across various industries. Currently, our portfolio consists of three wholly owned subsidiaries: Northstrive Biosciences Inc., PMGC Research Inc., and PMGC Capital LLC. We are committed to exploring opportunities in multiple sectors to maximize growth and value. For more information, please visit https://www.pmgcholdings.com.

    Forward-Looking Statements

    Statements contained in this press release regarding matters that are not historical facts are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, as amended. Words such as “believes,” “expects,” “plans,” “potential,” “would” and “future” or similar expressions such as “look forward” are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are made as of the date of this press release and are neither historical facts nor assurances of future performance. Instead, they are based only on our current beliefs, expectations and assumptions regarding the future of our business, future plans and strategies, projections, anticipated events and trends, the economy, activities of regulators and future regulations and other future conditions. Because forward-looking statements relate to the future, they are subject to inherent uncertainties, risks and changes in circumstances that are difficult to predict and many of which are outside of our control. Although the Company believes that the expectations expressed in these forward-looking statements are reasonable, it cannot assure you that such expectations will turn out to be correct, and the Company cautions investors that actual results may differ materially from the anticipated results. Therefore, you should not rely on any of these forward-looking statements. These and other risks are described more fully in PMGC Holdings’ filings with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), including the “Risk Factors” section of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024, filed with the SEC on March 28, 2025, and its other documents subsequently filed with or furnished to the SEC. Investors and security holders are urged to read these documents free of charge on the SEC’s web site at www.sec.gov. All forward-looking statements contained in this press release speak only as of the date on which they were made. Except to the extent required by law, the Company undertakes no obligation to update such statements to reflect events that occur or circumstances that exist after the date on which they were made.

    IR Contact:

    IR@pmgcholdings.com

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-Evening Report: ‘Be brave’ warning to nations against deepsea mining from UNOC

    By Laura Bergamo in Nice, France

    The UN Ocean Conference (UNOC) concluded today with significant progress made towards the ratification of the High Seas Treaty and a strong statement on a new plastics treaty signed by 95 governments.

    Once ratified, it will be the only legal tool that can create protected areas in international waters, making it fundamental to protecting 30 percent of the world’s oceans by 2030.

    Fifty countries, plus the European Union, have now ratified the Treaty.

    New Zealand has signed but is yet to ratify.

    Deep sea mining rose up the agenda in the conference debates, demonstrating the urgency of opposing this industry.

    The expectation from civil society and a large group of states, including both co-hosts of UNOC, was that governments would make progress towards stopping deep sea mining in Nice.

    UN Secretary-General Guterres said the deep sea should not become the “wild west“.

    Four new pledges
    French President Emmanuel Macron said a deep sea mining moratorium is an international necessity. Four new countries pledged their support for a moratorium at UNOC, bringing the total to 37.

    Attention now turns to what actions governments will take in July to stop this industry from starting.

    Megan Randles, Greenpeace head of delegation regarding the High Seas Treaty and progress towards stopping deep sea mining, said: “High Seas Treaty ratification is within touching distance, but the progress made here in Nice feels hollow as this UN Ocean Conference ends without more tangible commitments to stopping deep sea mining.

    “We’ve heard lots of fine words here in Nice, but these need to turn into tangible action.

    “Countries must be brave, stand up for global cooperation and make history by stopping deep sea mining this year.

    “They can do this by committing to a moratorium on deep sea mining at next month’s International Seabed Authority meeting.

    “We applaud those who have already taken a stand, and urge all others to be on the right side of history by stopping deep sea mining.”

    Attention on ISA meeting
    Following this UNOC, attention now turns to the International Seabed Authority (ISA) meetings in July. In the face of The Metals Company teaming up with US President Donald Trump to mine the global oceans, the upcoming ISA provides a space where governments can come together to defend the deep ocean by adopting a moratorium to stop this destructive industry.

    Negotiations on a Global Plastics Treaty resume in August.

    John Hocevar, oceans campaign director, Greenpeace USA said: “The majority of countries have spoken when they signed on to the Nice Call for an Ambitious Plastics Treaty that they want an agreement that will reduce plastic production. Now, as we end the UN Ocean Conference and head on to the Global Plastics Treaty negotiations in Geneva this August, they must act.

    “The world cannot afford a weak treaty dictated by oil-soaked obstructionists.

    “The ambitious majority must rise to this moment, firmly hold the line and ensure that we will have a Global Plastic Treaty that cuts plastic production, protects human health, and delivers justice for Indigenous Peoples and communities on the frontlines.

    “Governments need to show that multilateralism still works for people and the planet, not the profits of a greedy few.”

    Driving ecological collapse
    Nichanan Thantanwit, project leader, Ocean Justice Project, said: “Coastal and Indigenous communities, including small-scale fishers, have protected the ocean for generations. Now they are being pushed aside by industries driving ecological collapse and human rights violations.

    “As the UN Ocean Conference ends, governments must recognise small-scale fishers and Indigenous Peoples as rights-holders, secure their access and role in marine governance, and stop destructive practices such as bottom trawling and harmful aquaculture.

    “There is no ocean protection without the people who have protected it all along.”

    The anticipated Nice Ocean Action Plan, which consists of a political declaration and a series of voluntary commitments, will be announced later today at the end of the conference.

    None will be legally binding, so governments need to act strongly during the next ISA meeting in July and at plastic treaty negotiations in August.

    Republished from Greenpeace Aotearoa with permission.

    Article by AsiaPacificReport.nz

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-Evening Report: ‘Be brave’ warning to nations against deepsea mining from UNOC

    By Laura Bergamo in Nice, France

    The UN Ocean Conference (UNOC) concluded today with significant progress made towards the ratification of the High Seas Treaty and a strong statement on a new plastics treaty signed by 95 governments.

    Once ratified, it will be the only legal tool that can create protected areas in international waters, making it fundamental to protecting 30 percent of the world’s oceans by 2030.

    Fifty countries, plus the European Union, have now ratified the Treaty.

    New Zealand has signed but is yet to ratify.

    Deep sea mining rose up the agenda in the conference debates, demonstrating the urgency of opposing this industry.

    The expectation from civil society and a large group of states, including both co-hosts of UNOC, was that governments would make progress towards stopping deep sea mining in Nice.

    UN Secretary-General Guterres said the deep sea should not become the “wild west“.

    Four new pledges
    French President Emmanuel Macron said a deep sea mining moratorium is an international necessity. Four new countries pledged their support for a moratorium at UNOC, bringing the total to 37.

    Attention now turns to what actions governments will take in July to stop this industry from starting.

    Megan Randles, Greenpeace head of delegation regarding the High Seas Treaty and progress towards stopping deep sea mining, said: “High Seas Treaty ratification is within touching distance, but the progress made here in Nice feels hollow as this UN Ocean Conference ends without more tangible commitments to stopping deep sea mining.

    “We’ve heard lots of fine words here in Nice, but these need to turn into tangible action.

    “Countries must be brave, stand up for global cooperation and make history by stopping deep sea mining this year.

    “They can do this by committing to a moratorium on deep sea mining at next month’s International Seabed Authority meeting.

    “We applaud those who have already taken a stand, and urge all others to be on the right side of history by stopping deep sea mining.”

    Attention on ISA meeting
    Following this UNOC, attention now turns to the International Seabed Authority (ISA) meetings in July. In the face of The Metals Company teaming up with US President Donald Trump to mine the global oceans, the upcoming ISA provides a space where governments can come together to defend the deep ocean by adopting a moratorium to stop this destructive industry.

    Negotiations on a Global Plastics Treaty resume in August.

    John Hocevar, oceans campaign director, Greenpeace USA said: “The majority of countries have spoken when they signed on to the Nice Call for an Ambitious Plastics Treaty that they want an agreement that will reduce plastic production. Now, as we end the UN Ocean Conference and head on to the Global Plastics Treaty negotiations in Geneva this August, they must act.

    “The world cannot afford a weak treaty dictated by oil-soaked obstructionists.

    “The ambitious majority must rise to this moment, firmly hold the line and ensure that we will have a Global Plastic Treaty that cuts plastic production, protects human health, and delivers justice for Indigenous Peoples and communities on the frontlines.

    “Governments need to show that multilateralism still works for people and the planet, not the profits of a greedy few.”

    Driving ecological collapse
    Nichanan Thantanwit, project leader, Ocean Justice Project, said: “Coastal and Indigenous communities, including small-scale fishers, have protected the ocean for generations. Now they are being pushed aside by industries driving ecological collapse and human rights violations.

    “As the UN Ocean Conference ends, governments must recognise small-scale fishers and Indigenous Peoples as rights-holders, secure their access and role in marine governance, and stop destructive practices such as bottom trawling and harmful aquaculture.

    “There is no ocean protection without the people who have protected it all along.”

    The anticipated Nice Ocean Action Plan, which consists of a political declaration and a series of voluntary commitments, will be announced later today at the end of the conference.

    None will be legally binding, so governments need to act strongly during the next ISA meeting in July and at plastic treaty negotiations in August.

    Republished from Greenpeace Aotearoa with permission.

    Article by AsiaPacificReport.nz

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: First Minister John Swinney’s speech on national renewal

    Source: Scottish National Party

    Thank you for joining me here this morning.

    This is a room full of leaders, of decision makers, of people with a critical contribution to make to the future of Scottish society.

    Your contribution, and your leadership are essential if the agenda I set out today is to become our nation’s reality.

    The world is changing around us, at a pace and with an unpredictability that can leave us feeling anxious and unanchored, overwhelmed by the scale and complexity of the multiple challenges we face.

    We all know from speaking to our friends and neighbours, our colleagues and families, that hope is a commodity in short supply.

    Dark clouds dominate. There are many uncertainties. Which is why there is now – more than ever before – a need to set out a clear path forward.

    Despite the anxieties, I remain convinced that we have in Scotland all that we need to successfully navigate this changing world.

    But have no doubt, this changing world requires also a fundamental change in how we operate. The status quo – across almost every field of endeavour – is no longer sufficient, it no longer serves us well enough.

    Public services first built in and for the 20th century must become rooted instead in the realities of the 21st. Our public realm reshaped; our nation renewed and reborn for this new age.

    The Scotland I seek is modern and dynamic; it is an enterprising, compassionate, forward-looking nation that is well-placed to ride the waves of change rather than being buffeted by them, rather than being overwhelmed by them. A Scotland where tomorrow is better than today because, together, we have made it so.

    It means public services too that are modern, accessible, flexible, responsive and seamless. Services capable of responding to life’s crises as well as to lives everyday. Services that are robust and creative in response to all the challenges – fiscal, climate, demographic – that are coming our way.

    Today, therefore, I wish to do three things.

    First, set out the central importance of technology as we renew Scotland’s public realm.

    Second, highlight the various necessary elements of the roadmap as we move from where we are to where we need to be.

    This is not about reinventing the wheel. We are not starting from a blank page. In the principles identified by the Christie Commission, and in our experience of this past decade and more – hard lessons learnt as a result of austerity, the Covid pandemic and its aftermath, inflation and energy shocks – we know what we need to do.

    And third, and because the time for a step change in our approach is now, I will seek to engage you as active partners in this process of national renewal and rebirth.

    Public sector, private sector, third sector. National, regional, local. The challenges are many, yes, but the opportunities are more. Working together, let’s be resolute in our belief that we’ve got the necessary knowledge and capacity to transform Scotland’s fortunes.

    The task before us is difficult, but entirely achievable.

    The challenges are complex, but the tools at our disposal are increasingly sophisticated.

    I see firsthand, from my visits to all parts of the country, shining examples of partnership, innovation and success and I know that the first steps on the journey to better have already been taken.

    Quite simply, I believe in Scotland and in our collective abilities.

    Like you, I care deeply about this nation of ours. I see clearly her potential – the potential to be more modern in our approach and outlook.

    But let me be clear, we are not going to be able to make the money we have available for public services match the demand for those services unless we ramp up our use of technology.

    That requires a near complete digital refit of our public realm.

    Above all, systems that are designed to serve the public first. In the NHS, making it easier to manage appointments, making it simpler to access test results, and providing new digital access points to tools designed to support us in healthier living.

    Progress has been made – for example, I think of efforts around digital dermatology – but it is not extensive enough or rapid enough and that must intensify.

    Scotland’s public sector should have a digital doorway that matches the very best in the commercial world.

    That ambition will drive our actions ahead.

    Also fundamental, are systems that make collaboration between public bodies easier. Systems that speak to each other instead of requiring clumsy work arounds. Systems that facilitate collaboration and joined up working rather than blocking them. We have been talking about this for too long, it is now time to make it happen.

    And, of ever-increasing importance, technologies that enable ever more personalised public services.

    I think of the work being done to deliver more targeted public health. That means linking technology, including AI, to local contexts, enabling more effective prediction of risk as well as earlier diagnosis. Technology, including cutting-edge use of genetics, to target interventions more effectively. It means ensuring we have targeted interventions too in communities that need extra support.

    Professor Anna Dominiczak, our Chief Scientist for health, tells me that we have a generational opportunity to put Scotland at the forefront of deployment of precision medicine – an approach to healthcare that tailor’s medical treatment to the individual characteristics of each patient. It means a move away from a one-size-fits-all model, helping us ensure the right treatment at the right time for each patient.

    Over this coming decade, taking a more precise and personalised approach to medicine can, and I believe will, revolutionise healthcare. It means bringing together AI, data analysis, genetics and wearable devices. It will be the cornerstone of a more personalised, efficient and cost-effective NHS moving forward. It is at the heart of my vision for more person-centred health services.

    The foundations for this new approach are already in place, but it is now time to up the pace.

    That is why I have asked my Ministers Richard Lochhead and Ivan McKee, to take the lead as we make this vision a reality, so that we can bring the transformational technologies of tomorrow, many of which are being developed right here in Scotland, into day-to-day use in Scotland’s NHS.

    Technology deployed in a way that empowers individuals and communities, that enables our public sector to integrate better, makes it more efficient, and most important of all, facilitates the essential shift to a front-foot focus on prevention as the best means of saving the public purse in the long term.

    Those of you with a keen ear and a long memory will recognise those four elements – empowerment, integration, efficiency and prevention – as the four principles of the Christie Commission.

    It was 15 years ago, when I was Cabinet Secretary for Finance in the first SNP administration, that I asked the late Dr Campbell Christie to lead a Commission on the Future Delivery of Public Services.

    We launched the commission because we could see even then, in the immediate aftermath of the financial crisis and with the advent of austerity, and with climate and demographic challenges already to the fore, the necessity of moving to a more outcomes focused approach.

    The Christie approach has delivered key successes.

    The creation of a single Scottish Police service has led to over £200m in savings over legacy arrangements, while crime has continued to fall to near record low levels.

    Working at City Region level has enabled co-ordinated investment in economic development, transport and growth.

    And the partnership between local and central government that delivered the rapid expansion of early learning and childcare for all 3- and 4-year-olds and many 2-year-olds – a £1 billion a year investment in giving younger Scots the best possible start in life – offers an example of early intervention at its very best. We are already seeing the fruits of this choice, this investment, and will undoubtedly see more in the decades to come.

    However, the needs of this age mean we have to intensify our efforts to make the progress we require.

    That is because the headwinds have been strong. The global pandemic put unprecedented and prolonged strain on our public services. The challenges have become greater.

    Brexit and a shift in immigration policy has made it more difficult to recruit the public sector staff that we need.

    The post-Ukraine invasion inflation spike means that our money buys less than it used to.

    Our aging population is already resulting in greater demands on public services.

    The sum total of this is an environment in which, despite increased investment, and the valiant efforts of dedicated public sector staff, our public services strain at the seams.

    As austerity squeezed budgets and Covid increased demand, we – quite understandably – prioritised those most in need.

    This focus on the urgent consigned others to frustratingly long waits.

    Too often, it reinforced silos, as limited budgets were gripped ever more tightly.

    The result, a short-term win – it balances a budget – but it leaves long-term pressures to make services sustainable.

    Because those we do not support today are in greater need tomorrow.

    And when we address that greater need, we do so at the expense of the next person.  And when their need grows, we address it at the expense of the next person.  On and on.

    Across the public sector, we are effectively balancing this year’s budget just to chart a course to balance in next year’s.  And the same story the year after, and again, on and on.

    It is all a vicious cycle. It is unsustainable.  And I intend to sort it.

    That requires, right now, a clear, collective commitment to the paradigm shift in public service delivery that we started with Christie in 2011.

    I have given them in shorthand already, but here are the Christie principles in full:

    • Reform must aim to empower individuals and communities receiving public services by involving them in the design and delivery of the services they use.
    • Public service providers must be required to work much more closely in partnership, to integrate service provision and thus improve the outcomes they achieve.
    • We must prioritise expenditure on public services which prevent negative outcomes from arising.
    • And our whole system of public services – public, third and private sectors – must become more efficient by reducing duplication and sharing services wherever possible.

    Each of these principles is connected, each informs and shapes the other, each is essential if our project of renewal is to deliver the change that people quite rightly expect.

    A new way of working and thinking is demanded from my government.

    That shift is already underway with a sharpening of focus in the Programme for Government, with clear priorities then shaping also the decisions we make in the budget process.

    It is why we are reforming the National Performance Framework so that it enables the sort of cross-cutting, outcomes focused decisions that we need, while also reshaping the delivery structures within government.

    It requires a change also in the way we work with you and the way you work with each other.

    We must stop thinking only of our silos and the services we provide.  We must look at the whole person and the whole system.

    Fundamentally, we must shift our approach to one that focuses on value – the amount of impact we achieve for our investment.

    And that value must be the greatest overall value – not to an individual service.  It must be the greatest overall value to the person and to the wider system.

    Some of this can be done by making better use of the services we have.

    By better and earlier identification of who needs help.

    By making access easier and services more coordinated and seamless – tailored to people’s needs rather than to the system’s.

    And that is why I began today by focusing on the central role of technology in the delivery of our aims.

    But technology, while necessary, is on its own not enough.

    Equally, if we are to find value on the scale we need, marginal improvements in efficiency or effectiveness will not be sufficient.

    Quite simply, we cannot continue waiting until people have suffered, until the damage is done, and the problem has already cost us much to remedy, to at last do something about it.

    We must treat prevention and early intervention, not as luxuries we cannot afford, but as essentials our services can’t do without.

    Of course, when it comes to prevention and early intervention, most people think of health.  And for good reason; health, given its scope and scale, and its budget dominance, is a key arena for this.

    Eighty percent of what affects our health happens outside a health and care setting.  It happens in homes and schools, in workplaces and green spaces.  It happens in communities.

    So when we think of our health, we can’t think only of treatment and services.  We will never be successful only thinking of 20% of the things that make a difference.

    That is why, tomorrow, in partnership with COSLA, we take an important step towards supporting the other 80%: We publish Scotland’s 10-year Population Health Framework.

    This Framework will set into motion system-wide action designed to increase life expectancy and reduce health inequalities across the Scottish population.

    Just as much, it seeks to set into motion a cultural shift moving beyond the medical model of treatment in favour of a community-wide approach to improving and sustaining the population’s health and wellbeing.

    But this move to prevention and maximising value is not only about our approach to health.  We must radically rethink how we design, develop and deliver all our public services.

    Fundamentally, we must stop thinking in terms of expenditure and start thinking in terms of investment.

    We invest in preventative services today because we know we will benefit from them tomorrow.  And so will the people we are investing in.

    They will benefit when they stay out of poverty.

    When they stay out of the criminal justice system.

    When they go further in school.

    When their air is cleaner, and their spaces are greener.

    And when they live longer, healthier, wealthier and happier lives.

    Scotland has form with this kind of investment in prevention.  We have been doing it for many years from high profile initiatives like the smoking ban or minimum unit pricing to the significant anti-poverty interventions like the Scottish Child Payment.

    And, let’s be very clear about this: prevention is not some vague policy speak only relevant to rooms full of professionals such as this.

    Prevention is the hard-nosed financial principle behind the decisions we have taken on the Winter Fuel Payment.

    When the UK Labour Government decided to take the payment off millions of pensioners, I was appalled. Most people were.

    I was appalled at the immorality.

    But I was also appalled at the financial shortsightedness it represented.

    The Winter Fuel Payment kept some of the most vulnerable in society warm in winter.

    It was always the right thing to do but it was also the smart thing to do.

    Smart because it kept people out of hospital, in their own home. It kept them warm and well.

    And then it was gone. To be quite blunt about it, I don’t believe cutting this winter lifeline was ever going to save a penny.

    Because making millions of pensioners poorer makes them also colder and makes them also sicker.

    And that in turn puts up the bill for our social services and our NHS.

    It is an almost textbook definition of a false economy.

    Keeping the Winter Fuel Payment looks after our pensioners, but it also looks after our NHS.

    That is the sharp financial reality of the prevention principle in action. It is one of the reasons we were so quick to step in to protect pensioners in Scotland as best we could from Labour’s wrong decision.

    And now they have seen the error of their ways, my government will once again do right by Scotland’s pensioners.

    I am very happy to confirm that no pensioner in Scotland will receive less than they would under the new UK scheme.

    Details will be set out in due course but my Government, the Scottish Government, will always seek what is best for Scotland’s pensioners.

    That is one particularly prominent example of the prevention principle in action, but it happens also in ways big and small across Scotland today.

    To take one example, Glasgow Health and Social Care Partnership decided to invest in holistic, intensive family support for looked after and accommodated children in the care system.

    It meant early crisis intervention when needed, but also a more compassionate and child-centred approach – the result, the number of children in formal care has more than halved between 2016 and today.

    At the same time, savings of nearly £30 million have been achieved, as well as £70 million in cost avoidance.

    Imagine the possibilities if we make gains like these across the public sector: significantly improved outcomes delivering also significantly reduced costs.

    I am aware of the challenges. People have developed specialisms. There is attachment to ways of doing things developed through years of training, dedication and hard work.

    Sacrifice is often required and that is asking a lot of people, especially if there is no clear vision of what better means.

    Structures designed for the world we have known make it almost impossible to bring together data or budgets for the new world that is emerging. Our ways of understanding need don’t match with what we measure or how we fund.

    Existing systems of accountability and governance are no longer fit for purpose.

    These are real problems, absolutely, and up to now they have hamstrung change. But no more. These barriers must be navigated, and any blockages removed.

    Once again, I include national government in this.  I am talking as much to my Ministers and officials as I am to you.

    I offer you this guarantee. I have made it clear within government that we must be enablers of change.

    That includes a willingness to change the way we manage budgets and move money around the system.

    To change how and where we make decisions, how we empower and hold our leaders and staff accountable.

    As First Minister, have no doubt, I will provide leadership to drive this forward. And my government will provide coordination, share learning so that change can happen at pace. And if you see a blockage that we are creating, a barrier that we are building. If our actions don’t match our words, you must let me know.

    On Thursday, and as an important next step in this work, we will publish Scotland’s Public Service Reform strategy – a new approach developed with the input of the councils, public bodies, third sector organisations and business who attended our Public Service Reform Summit earlier this year.

    It will update Christie for this new decade and set out a vision and a plan to renew Scotland’s public services sector – a path towards greater focus on value and sustainability, on shifting care away from acute crisis response towards seamless community support, prevention and early intervention.

    Our Medium Term Financial Strategy, which we will publish next week, will define an approach to managing the public finances that will align with and enable this work.

    Strategies are necessary but never on their own enough. Getting delivery right on the ground is way more important than getting the words right on a page.

    That is why next week I will also bring together a delivery-focused group of senior leaders across local government, the health service, the third sector and the wider public sector, to drive forward our approach to Whole Family Support.

    As the name implies, Whole Family Support looks at the whole person and the whole family.  It proactively offers tailored support where they need it, regardless of what that support might look like.

    No one is pushed from pillar to post.  It does not require numerous referrals, repeated forms or questions.  Support and care reach the family as one, big public service.

    No one – and no need – falls through the cracks because there aren’t any. Instead, families work with someone who knows their names, their children’s names, their struggles and their strengths.

    This means issues are addressed as quickly and effectively as possible, in the way that is just right for that particular family.

    And that quick, effective care reduces the need for more costly interventions down the line.

    In this way, Whole Family Support makes the most of our collective assets and expertise.

    It trusts people, communities and frontline workers to know what is needed, and it aligns our shared resources and processes behind that.

    It is Christie put into practice as we commit ourselves on this path of renewal.

    I want you to leave today with a clear sense of my ambition and my commitment to this national project of renewal.

    I want you to feel enthused, but more importantly empowered. This will only happen if we, if you, make it happen.

    People often tell me that they feel as though they do not have permission to deliver the change in their organisation that they know is needed. Well today, let’s give each other that permission.

    This is a moment for change. All around us we hear the demand for better. But the solution is not to rip things up or pull things down, but to build on the strong foundations that we are blessed with.

    It is a time when we can come together and choose to renew our nation.

    It is a time when we can make Scotland the modern, dynamic, forward-looking nation we know it can be.

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI China: China’s consumer spending grows at faster pace on policy support

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    BEIJING, June 16 — China’s consumer spending in May posted its strongest growth in nearly one and a half years, as the country’s supportive policies helped boost consumption and economic activity.

    The retail sales of consumer goods, a major indicator of China’s consumption strength, grew 6.4 percent year on year in May, accelerating from a rise of 5.1 percent registered in April and marking the fastest growth since December 2023, according to the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS).

    From January to May, the retail sales of consumer goods rose 5 percent year on year, also accelerating from the 4.7 percent growth in the first four months, according to the NBS.

    Factors supporting consumption growth in May included the government’s consumer goods trade-in program, the “618” shopping festival that began in May this year, and the expansion of the country’s visa-free entry policy, NBS spokesperson Fu Linghui told a press conference on Monday.

    The combined retail sales of consumer goods related to trade-ins grew rapidly. In breakdown, sales of household appliances, audio-visual equipment, communication devices, cultural and office supplies and furniture surged by as much as 53 percent year on year in May, contributing 1.9 percentage points to the overall increase in total retail sales of consumer goods, Fu noted.

    The country’s online retail sales maintained solid growth, with that of physical goods expanding 6.3 percent year on year during the first five months, accounting for 24.5 percent of the total retail sales.

    Fu said that China’s economy has maintained steady momentum, with the consumption market showing increased vitality as the benefits of the consumer goods trade-in program continue to take effect.

    China’s economy grew by 5.4 percent year on year in the first quarter of 2025, up from the 5 percent full-year growth rate recorded in 2024. Economic data for the second quarter and the first half of the year is scheduled to be released on July 15.

    Monday’s data also showed that China’s industrial production and fixed-asset investment maintained steady growth from January to May, while the pace of home price declines in major cities continued to ease in May.

    Looking ahead, Fu said he expects new drivers of growth to emerge in China’s consumption sector, but emphasized that further efforts are needed to strengthen consumers’ purchasing power and confidence.

    MIL OSI China News

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: Global: Urgent action needed as climate crisis leads to devastating new harms to human rights

    Source: Amnesty International –

    States must urgently deliver ambitious climate action by mapping out a just transition away from fossil fuels in all sectors to prevent even worse human rights harms around the world, Amnesty International said in a new briefing to mark the start of the Bonn Climate Conference which takes place between 16-26 June.

    Despite the challenges posed by the US withdrawal from the Paris Climate Agreement, increases in authoritarian practices globally and the growing environmental devastation of the escalating armed conflicts in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, Sudan and Ukraine, among others, it is not too late for states to find common ground and ramp up climate ambition for the planet and the rights of current and future generations.

    In 2024, for the first time, the world breached the threshold of 1.5°C of global heating above pre-industrial levels. During the hottest year on record, wildfires ripped through Latin America, the Caribbean was hit by the earliest Category 5 Atlantic hurricane on record, and parts of Central Europe were deluged with three months’ worth of rain in five days as the climate emergency worsened, driven by human activity and the continued burning of fossil fuels.

    “The devastating new human rights harms resulting from climate change will escalate dramatically unless global heating is kept in check. More people will be driven deeper into poverty, lose their homes or suffer the effects of drought and food insecurity. Despite the deepening climate crisis, governments’ action to limit fossil fuel production and use has been wholly inadequate,” said Ann Harrison, Amnesty International’s Climate Justice Advisor.  

    “Governments are in thrall to fossil fuel companies which have sought to downplay climate harms and discredit climate science. States continue to provide subsidies to these companies, effectively incentivizing the continuation of the fossil fuel industry. Everyone has the right to live in a clean, healthy and sustainable environment – but as the climate crisis intensifies, this right, and others, are under growing threat.”

    Across the globe, unnatural disasters exacerbated by climate change, such as worsening droughts and severe floods, are damaging harvests and leading to food scarcity and water shortages, contributing to displacement, migration and conflict.

    Protecting and listening to grassroots voices

    Marginalized frontline and fence line communities that use fossil fuels the least continue to suffer some of the worst impacts of climate change. They include subsistence farmers, Indigenous Peoples and those living in low lying island states, threatened by rising sea levels and more powerful storms, or those living beside fossil fuel production and transport facilities.

    For example, Pakistan contributes less than 1% of greenhouse gas emissions annually but is one of the countries most vulnerable to climate disasters. In a report published last month, Amnesty International documented how increasingly frequent floods and heatwaves are leading to preventable deaths, particularly among young children and older adults.

    Despite the urgency of the climate crisis, those demanding action from the authorities are being harassed, stigmatized, attacked and criminalized. Around the world, environmental human rights defenders (EHRDs) are risking their lives and liberty for defending their lands and communities’ right to a healthy environment, such as the Warriors for the Amazon in Ecuador.

    “The voices, views, knowledge and wisdom of Indigenous Peoples, frontline and fence line communities and human rights defenders must be incorporated into climate policies, plans and action.

    Ann Harrison, Amnesty International’s Climate Justice Advisor

    The conference is an opportunity to spotlight the situation in COP29 host Azerbaijan, where environmental human rights defender Anar Mammadli and journalist Nargiz Absalamova who reported on environmental issues remain behind bars. Other journalists who reported on the human rights situation including during COP29 were arrested afterwards in apparent reprisals. Brazil, the host of COP30, is one of the most dangerous countries for EHRDs, who face killings, violence, threats and stigmatization for their work.

    “The voices, views, knowledge and wisdom of Indigenous Peoples, frontline and fence line communities and human rights defenders must be incorporated into climate policies, plans and action,” said Ann Harrison.

    “Once again, we have heard reports of limited badges and visa problems for those from the majority world wishing to attend the conference in Bonn. Nor are the COP Host Country Agreements – a key tool that must be strengthened to ensure freedom of expression and peaceful assembly for participants – available publicly as a matter of routine.”

    Climate finance must be addressed

    Amnesty International is also calling for states to tackle climate finance. Currently, lower-income countries are paying more in debt repayments than they are receiving as climate finance from high-income countries.

    High income historically high emitting countries are most responsible for climate change, yet continue to shirk their obligations to provide climate finance to lower income countries to cut emissions and to help communities to adapt to climate change, as well as providing reparations for loss and damage, which could ease the burden in countries suffering climate harms.

    “Taxing fossil fuel companies, corporate windfall profits and high net worth individuals, as well as ending subsidies and investments in fossil fuels and ending global tax abuses, could raise over USD 3 trillion per year which could go a huge way towards the cost of tackling climate change,” said Ann Harrison.

    Huge changes need to be made

    The Bonn Climate Conference is a key preparatory moment for the annual UN Climate Conference, which takes place as COP30 later this year in Brazil – a country that wants to publicly lead a message of global environmental protection. Yet, internally some of its institutions are taking actions contrary to this agenda, including requiring less stringent licensing for environmentally destructive projects and expanding fossil fuel production.

    “If climate change is to be taken seriously and to keep global warming below 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels, we need to see concrete progress with clear timelines towards massively scaled-up needs-based climate finance, particularly for adaptation and loss and damage, in the form of grants, not loans, with those most responsible for emissions contributing the most,” said Ann Harrison.

    Amnesty International is calling for states commit to a full, fast, fair and funded fossil fuel phase out through just transitions across all sectors, without relying on risky and unproven technologies or offsets that do not lead to genuine emissions reductions. It is also calling for inclusive discussions around climate change, involving the people most affected by it, and ensuring they can meaningfully access these high-level negotiations without discrimination.

    MIL OSI NGO

  • Sensex, Nifty rise nearly 1% despite rising Middle East tensions

    Source: Government of India

    Source: Government of India (4)

    Indian stock markets displayed resilience on Monday amid escalating tensions between Israel and Iran, as investors maintained their focus on long-term fundamentals despite the volatile geopolitical backdrop.

    Both the Sensex and Nifty ended the day with sharp gains of nearly 1 per cent, reflecting investor optimism in the face of uncertainty.

    The Sensex surged 677.55 points, or 0.84 per cent, to close at 81,796.15, after hitting an intra-day high of 81,865.82.

    Similarly, the Nifty advanced 227.9 points, or 0.92 per cent, to settle at 24,946.50.

    “The index witnessed a sharp rally as it reclaimed the 21-EMA after a brief dip below it,” said Rupak De, Senior Technical Analyst at LKP Securities. “Currently, with investors awaiting the Fed’s follow-up commentary post the rate announcement, a steep directional move is not expected for now.”

    However, De added, “A rally towards 25,350 looks highly probable once Nifty reclaims the 25,000 mark. On the downside, support is placed at 24,850.”

    Broader markets also posted gains. The Nifty Midcap100 rose by 0.93 per cent, while the Nifty Smallcap100 climbed 0.95 per cent.

    All sectoral indices ended in the green, indicating broad-based buying. The Nifty IT index was the top performer, gaining 1.57 per cent, followed by Realty (1.32 per cent), Oil & Gas (1.11 per cent), and Metal (1.07 per cent).

    Other sectors including banking, energy, FMCG, pharma, and media also closed higher.

    Among the top gainers on the Sensex were Ultratech Cement, Tech Mahindra, HCL Tech, TCS, Kotak Mahindra Bank, and Infosys — with some stocks rising up to 2.4 per cent.

    On the downside, Tata Motors emerged as the biggest laggard, falling 3.76 per cent. Sun Pharma also closed in the red.

    Meanwhile, the India VIX — often referred to as the market’s “fear index” — declined by 1.6 per cent to 14.83, suggesting a relatively calm market outlook in the short term.

    Vinod Nair, Head of Research at Geojit Financial Services, noted that despite geopolitical tensions in the Middle East, the markets moved higher, supported largely by gains in large-cap stocks.

    “Geopolitical developments in the region are likely to influence near-term market sentiment, with any signs of de-escalation being closely monitored. Small-cap stocks may underperform in the short term due to their elevated valuations and lack of immediate triggers,” he said.

    -IANS

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Focus on skills at Civil Service Live 2025

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    News story

    Focus on skills at Civil Service Live 2025

    Civil Service Live is under way – with a chance for civil servants to find out more about the cross-government learning they can access – much of which is free.

    Sir Chris Wormald, Cabinet Secretary

    Civil Service Live is under way – with a chance for civil servants to find out more about the cross-government learning they can access – much of which is free.

    Government Skills is the Cabinet Office team responsible for all cross-government learning and top civil servants have been helping us to champion the Curriculum of recommended learning  – which gives civil servants easy access to the quality-assured learning that matters most.

    Pictured are:

    The Cabinet Secretary, Sir Chris Wormald, who joined Government Skills’ volunteers at their stand at Civil Service Live in Belfast, while Northern Ireland Office director Caroline Hacker joined Government Skills’ deputy director Martin Petto speaking at Invest in Yourself to Succeed plenary session at the event.

    Earlier in the week, Sir Olly Robins, Permanent Under-Secretary, Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office, left, joined Government Skills’ head of early career management training Neil Alton – architect of the innovative

    Achieving Your Potential course for would-be line managers – at Civil Service Live in Glasgow.

    Left to right, Martin Petto, Caroline Hacker, Sir Olly Robins and Neil Alton

    “Skills are at the heart of ambitions for a productive and agile Civil Service that can truly deliver on the Government’s missions,” said Sir Olly.

    “That’s why I am so pleased to be at Civil Service Live on its opening day and to be able to champion the value of the brilliant learning opportunities available to us all, including digital and data skills.”

    Find out more about Government Skills’ Curriculum of recommended learning – which includes quality-approved relevant courses – many of which are free.

    Updates to this page

    Published 16 June 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Boosting British jobs and skills key for firms to win major infrastructure projects

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    Press release

    Boosting British jobs and skills key for firms to win major infrastructure projects

    Creating high quality British jobs and boosting skills in local communities will be key requirements for companies to win contracts for major infrastructure projects, under proposals to be consulted on. 

    • Road, rail, hospital and school building contracts to create high quality British jobs and boost skills in local communities as part of Plan for Change.
    • Plans under consultation will mean companies will need to show they can create opportunity and growth locally when bidding for public sector contracts
    • Overhaul will maximise benefits for working people as government prepares to unveil plans for billions of pounds of investment in Infrastructure Strategy and Industrial Strategy.

    Creating high quality British jobs and boosting skills in local communities will be key requirements for companies to win contracts for major infrastructure projects, under proposals to be consulted on. 

    Cabinet Office minister Pat McFadden has ordered the overhaul of public procurement rules to maximise the benefit to working people, as this government invests in Britain’s future following the Spending Review with billions for new roads, railway lines, hospitals and schools.

    The first job of this Government was to stabilise the British economy and the public finances. Now we move into a new chapter to deliver on the promise of change.

    The upcoming Infrastructure Strategy and Industrial Strategy will detail plans for billions of pounds of investment in projects across the United Kingdom that will create jobs, prosperity and put more money in people’s pockets.

    The Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, Pat McFadden, said:

    Whether it’s building roads, railways or schools, we want to open up opportunities on major infrastructure projects for firms that boost British jobs and skills.

    The new rules will deliver on our Plan for Change by rewarding companies that put money in working people’s pockets as we invest in the country’s future.

    Under the changes proposed in the Cabinet Office consultation, public bodies would have to give more weight to firms that can show they will boost British jobs and skills in their bids for contracts.

    The change will apply to major government projects including transport investments, as well as school and hospital building schemes.

    The latest proposals will build on progress delivered in February, when the Government set out an expectation for public bodies to provide wider social and economic value when awarding £385billion worth of public contracts every year. The changes would make this a mandatory requirement in all major new contracts.

    These new proposed changes, that also form a central part of the upcoming Industrial Strategy, will mean public sector organisations also seeking to launch major infrastructure projects will reward suppliers that can show they will bring benefits targeted to the specific needs of a community.

    For example, when assessing how a company could deliver a road building project, a public body would need to consider how the firm would offer benefits such as apprenticeships, T-level industry placements, opportunities for care leavers, or helping people get into work and stay in work in that area. 

    In the past companies have made pledges when they are bidding for a contract but don’t always follow through. Under these plans, we will make sure that companies deliver their promises on skills, jobs and local opportunities.

    A new simpler approach to social value will be developed that can provide a simpler set of criteria for public bodies to use, with clearer rules on monitoring how suppliers are delivering on contract requirements, such as new jobs and training opportunities created.

    Updates to this page

    Published 16 June 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: John Booth reappointed as Chair of the National Gallery.

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    News story

    John Booth reappointed as Chair of the National Gallery.

    John Booth reappointed as a Trustee of the National Gallery and remains its Chairman.

    John Booth

    John Booth CVO has been appointed by the Prime Minister as a Trustee of the National Gallery for a second term of four years from 20 August 2025 to 19 August 2029.

    John chairs a number of public and private companies including the London Theatre Company. He also serves as a non-executive director of several investment management businesses and has venture capital interests in e-commerce, media and telecommunications. He is Vice President of The King’s Trust, Chairman of The Royal Drawing School and a trustee of the Chatsworth Settlement and the Arts Foundation. He is a Fellow of the Society of Antiquaries and of Merton College, Oxford, a member of the American Academy of Arts & Sciences and Ambassador for the homelessness charity Depaul International.

    John joined the Board of the National Gallery in March 2021. As a result of his reappointment, the National Gallery Trustees have confirmed that John will continue in his role as Chairman of the Gallery’s Board.

    Remuneration and Governance Code

    Trustees of the National Gallery are not remunerated. This appointment has been made in accordance with the Cabinet Office’s Governance Code on Public Appointments.

    The appointments process is regulated by the Commissioner for Public Appointments. Under the Code, any significant political activity undertaken by an appointee in the last five years must be declared. This is defined as including holding office, public speaking, making a recordable donation, or candidature for election. John has not declared any significant political activity.

    Updates to this page

    Published 16 June 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Patrick Barker, Edmund Neuberger and Naila Yousuf appointed to the Board of the Horniman Museum and Gardens.

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    News story

    Patrick Barker, Edmund Neuberger and Naila Yousuf appointed to the Board of the Horniman Museum and Gardens.

    The Secretary of State has appointed Patrick Barker, Edmund Neuberger and Nalia Yousuf as Trustees of The Horniman Public Museum and Public Park Trust, known publicly as the Horniman Museum and Gardens, from 24 April 2025 until 23 April 2029.

    Patrick Barker

    Patrick is a qualified accountant with a passion for bringing his financial expertise to the charity and public sectors. He began his career in the corporate world giving him the opportunity to work internationally, and where he built a solid foundation in finance and strategic planning. Motivated by a desire to make a meaningful difference, he transitioned into the not-for-profit sector, where he has dedicated his career to support impactful causes.

    Patrick has held many senior leadership positions, including Finance Director and Chief Executive Officer, across a variety of charitable organisations. His work has spanned areas such as heritage, mental health, freedom of speech, international development, and cancer, playing a key role in strengthening financial resilience and guiding organisations through periods of growth and change.

    A local to the Horniman Museum and Gardens, he sees its great potential as a community hub and a place for the entire family to learn and enjoy.

    Edmund Neuberger

    Edmund is a London based barrister specialising in international and domestic construction, engineering, and infrastructure projects, including professional negligence and insurance disputes. He is a member of the Society of Construction Law (SCL), Commercial Bar Association (COMBAR), Technology and Construction Bar Association (TECBAR) and the London Common Law and Commercial Bar Association (LCLBA). 

    Edmund works regularly on a wide range of international and domestic infrastructure projects and has a technical background in engineering. Recognised in Chambers & Partners, Legal 500, and Who’s Who Legal, he is praised for his commercial approach and analytical skills. His experience spans work in Asia, the Middle East, Europe, and Africa.

    Edmund lives in South London with his wife and two children. In his spare time, he enjoys running and cooking.

    Naila Yousuf

    Naila Yousuf is a Partner at Wright & Wright Architects and has led several high-profile cultural and higher education projects. A creative thinker in retrofit, architectural heritage, and contemporary interventions on historic sites, she led the major redevelopment of the award-winning Museum of the Home and the planning and consultation strategy for Lambeth Palace Library.

    Since moving to London in 2007, Naila has been a frequent visitor to the Horniman Museum and inspired by its transformation over the years, including its work with communities and leadership in addressing the climate emergency. She has joined the board to support the Horniman with its capital projects.

    Reimagining historic sites with a deep understanding of how they can adapt to the climate crisis is central to her professional work. Currently, Naila leads her team on a highly sustainable Passivhaus project for St Edmund Hall, one of Oxford’s oldest colleges. Constructed from Cross-Laminated Timber (CLT), the project plays a key role in the College’s commitment to achieving net-zero carbon.

    An advocate for architectural engagement in schools, Naila has served as an external examiner at the University of Nottingham, a mentor at the Royal College of Art, and leads Wright & Wright’s collaboration with the London School of Architecture’s Partnership Network—an institution that facilitates part-time study. She is also a member of the Cathedrals Fabric Commission for England and a passionate supporter of museums and exhibitions, regularly lecturing on the subject.

    Remuneration and Governance Code

    Trustees of the Horniman Public Museum and Public Park Trust are not remunerated. This appointment has been made in accordance with the Cabinet Office’s Governance Code on Public Appointments.

    The appointments process is regulated by the Commissioner for Public Appointments. Under the Code, any significant political activity undertaken by an appointee in the last five years must be declared. This is defined as including holding office, public speaking, making a recordable donation, or candidature for election. Patrick, Edward and Naila have not declared any significant political activity.

    Updates to this page

    Published 16 June 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Frontline workers and local communities to play crucial role in delivery of Government missions

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    Press release

    Frontline workers and local communities to play crucial role in delivery of Government missions

    Three of the Government’s thematic campuses – key locations drawing together staff from different departments with different skills and expertise – will become testbeds of the Government’s missions.

    • The Government is re-wiring the state from the ground up as new teams bringing together civil servants and frontline workers will work on missions in Darlington, Sheffield and Leeds.
    • The teams will leave their desks behind and work on the ground with communities to rapidly test ideas to deliver the growth, opportunity and health missions. 
    • Secondment scheme to be launched between local and central government to share experience and skills, starting in Sheffield, Leeds, Manchester and Darlington.

    Local communities and frontline workers, such as teachers and NHS staff, will have a greater impact on shaping national policy, in the next phase of the Government’s plan to transform public services and deliver the Plan for Change.

    Under the plans, three of the Government’s thematic campuses – key locations drawing together staff from different departments with different skills and expertise – will become testbeds of the Government’s missions.

    Rather than writing policy papers, teams will be asked to get into communities to work with those using local services and workers on the frontline to develop new ideas to deliver on the missions.

    The move builds on the Places for Growth commitments unveiled last month to locate thousands of civil servants outside London, bringing central government closer to the people it serves.

    Darlington will drive the growth mission, Sheffield will focus on opportunity and Leeds on the health mission. This latest action is part of the Government’s Plan for Change, re-wiring the state to be more productive and agile.

    The three areas will work hand in hand with local public service providers under a new pilot programme – the community mission challenge.

    The programme will see civil servants based in these thematic campuses work with local counterparts and frontline workers at speed to solve some of the key issues facing their local areas. 

    These solutions and ways of working can then be scaled up across other parts of the UK to accelerate delivery of the missions nationally – delivering security for working people and renewal for our country.

    Cabinet Office Minister Georgia Gould said:

    In every community in the country there are people trying to improve their local area with ideas for how things should change and government often misses the innovation happening on the ground in communities. 

    We want a civil service that is connected to the British people, backing their ideas and working alongside communities to deliver the missions. 

    The new approach we are announcing today will deliver new opportunities that people can feel where they live and start to re-wire the state from the ground up.

    The Leader of Leeds City Council, Councillor James Lewis, said:

    We are delighted that Leeds will host one of three new thematic campuses, with Leeds focusing on the Government’s health mission. This aligns with our local health and wellbeing strategy, which aims to improve the health of the poorest fastest. 

    Leeds is a growing, diverse and ambitious city with well established neighbourhood networks run by the voluntary and community sector and large anchor organisations working in partnership with the local authority, and a wealth of front line expertise which will really benefit this new initiative.  

    As a city, we have a hard won reputation for innovation, especially within the health and social care sector, so we are perfectly suited to focus on the health mission which has been entrusted to the city.

    We look forward to playing a significant role in helping to shape national policy and to bringing central government closer our community.

    The Leader of Sheffield City Council, Councillor Tom Hunt, said:

    In Sheffield, we know that tackling our biggest challenges requires new ways of working. From supporting people to get back into work to helping all children to thrive, collaboration is key. Real change happens by combining local expertise with local, regional, and national government. 

    We’ve developed this approach through our trailblazing Family Hubs and in the Pathways to Work Programme. Through the community mission challenge we will work with frontline providers, the Mayoral Combined Authority and our colleagues in Rotherham, Barnsley and Doncaster to continue to improve public services.

    We are proud that Sheffield Policy Campus has been chosen to lead on the Opportunity Mission.

    The Leader of Darlington Borough Council, Steve Harker, said:

    This is a fantastic opportunity to pilot closer partnership working between Local Authorities and Government. Closer working with Government will enable Local Authorities, together with our local communities, help shape delivery of the Government missions of growth, opportunity and health – and so ensure even better outcomes for local people.

    It’s really significant that the new Government is determined to explore how we can work better and more effectively together. So, I’m really pleased for Darlington to be part of the pilot.

    A new secondment scheme between Government and local authorities is also being developed in partnership with the Local Government Association, with people in both central and local government able to participate.

    The scheme aims to harness the invaluable skills and experience that frontline workers and those embedded in their local areas can use to inform national policy – and enable central government to share learnings and perspectives with local areas. 

    The secondment scheme will be piloted in Place for Growth Thematic Campuses in Darlington, Sheffield, Leeds and Manchester, starting in the Autumn. 

    As part of this scheme, youth workers, social workers and other experts from across local government will be able to directly shape national policy as the government works to deliver the Plan for Change and break down barriers to opportunity for young people.

    The measures outlined today build on work already underway to pilot new and innovative ways of working with local and central government under the Test, Learn and Grow scheme, announced by the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster.

    Updates to this page

    Published 16 June 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Investment zones to bring jobs and cash to Scotland

    Source: United Kingdom – Government Statements

    News story

    Investment zones to bring jobs and cash to Scotland

    Both investment zones will support thousands of jobs and bring in millions of pounds of investment, as part of the UK Government’s Plan for Change.

    Advanced Manufacturing will be a key part of the Glasgow Investment Zone

    Jobs and cash boost for Scotland as two investment zones have reached a key milestone.   

    At the Spending Review the Chancellor confirmed the focus of both Glasgow City Region and the North East Scotland Investment Zones (IZs). 

    The Glasgow site will be focussed on advanced manufacturing, targeting innovation in the space and maritime fields and in semi-conductor production. It is expected to generate around £300 million of initial private investment and support up to 10,000 jobs in the region. 

    After California, Glasgow City Region is the largest supplier of small satellites in the world, with around 30 companies in the industry. 

    The North East IZ will focus on green industries and the digital and tech sectors, building on the region’s existing strengths and playing a key role in the country’s transition away from oil and gas. 

    This is expected to generate around £1.7 billion of private investment and support up to 18,000 jobs. 

    Deputy Prime Minister and Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government Angela Rayner said:  

    Growing the economy to improve living standards is the number one priority of our Plan for Change, creating opportunities for communities across the UK. 

    That’s why we have taken forward Scotland’s two Investment Zones. By building on the amazing strengths Glasgow and North East Scotland already possess, they will attract the investment and drive the growth that people deserve.

    Deputy First Minister Kate Forbes said:

    Investment Zones will play a role in attracting private investment, growing Scotland’s economy and creating jobs. They will help to maximise the impact of our world-class universities and colleges, leveraging our existing research and innovation strengths, and grasping emerging opportunities to support growth in the Glasgow City Region and the North East. 

    The Scottish Government is providing a package of Non-Domestic Rates Retention at the sites which can be used to further invest in the Zones and their infrastructure.

    We have worked with the UK Government to tailor the Investment Zone model to align with Scotland’s economic strategy, supporting the development of clusters and driving innovation in key sectors such as net zero, advanced manufacturing and digital technologies.

    UK Government Scotland Office Minister Kirsty McNeill said: 

    The Spending Review clearly showed how Scotland is at the beating heart of the UK Government’s Plan for Change and confirmation of the focus for Scotland’s two Investment Zones is an important part of our commitment to drive an industrial transformation across the country.

    The skills and expertise in the Glasgow City Region are perfectly matched to maximising growth in advanced manufacturing, space and maritime with North East Scotland a world leader in green energy, digital and technology. Backed by £160 million UK Government investment each, these zones are part of billions of pounds we are investing to back Scottish jobs as we work with local partners to unleash a new era of growth across Scotland.

    The Investment Zones are joint projects between the UK and Scottish governments and the Glasgow City Region and North East Scotland Regional Economic Partnerships. 

    Glasgow’s IZ is based across Glasgow City Region, with a focus around key sites including the Advanced Manufacturing Innovation District Scotland next to Glasgow Airport in Renfrewshire and the city’s two Innovation Districts, Glasgow Riverside Innovation District and Glasgow City Innovation District.

    And the North East IZ will be located in Aberdeen and Aberdeenshire, with key sites including the Energy Transition Zone in the city, strategically located by the Port of Aberdeen South Harbour expansion, and Peterhead – well positioned to take advantage of the emerging opportunities in green industries with easy access to Peterhead Port. 

    The news follows the confirmation of continued UK Government funding for the Investment Zone programme in the Autumn Budget. 

    The UK Government is committed to creating good jobs and better living standards for everyone, everywhere in the UK as part of the Plan for Change. The Scottish Investment Zones – two of 13 planned Investment Zones across the UK – will play a key role in that mission.

    Updates to this page

    Published 16 June 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-Evening Report: Samoan fashion designer fatally shot at Salt Lake City ‘no kings’ protest

    RNZ Pacific

    A renowned Samoan fashion designer was fatally shot at the “No Kings” protest in Salt Lake City on Saturday, the Salt Lake City Police Department (SLCPD) has confirmed.

    Arthur Folasa Ah Loo, known as Afa Ah Loo, an “innocent bystander” at the protest, died despite efforts by paramedics to save his life, police said.

    Ah Loo, a Utah resident, died at the hospital. The Utah Office of the Medical Examiner will determine the official cause and manner of death.

    The SLPCD said the incident began about 7.56pm local time when a sergeant assigned to the SLCPD Motor Squad reported hearing gunfire near 151 South State Street.

    It said the sergeant and his squad were working to facilitate traffic and help to ensure public safety during a permitted demonstration that drew an estimated 10,000 participants.

    “As panic spread throughout the area, hundreds of people ran for safety, hiding in parking garages, behind barriers, and going into nearby businesses.

    “The first officers on scene notified SLCPD’s incident management team using their police radios.”

    The SLCPD said officers quickly moved in to secure the scene and search for any active threats and found a man who had been shot and immediately began life-saving efforts.

    “Our thoughts are with the family and friends of the 39-year-old man who was killed, and with the many community members who were impacted by this traumatic incident,” Salt Lake City police chief Brian Redd said.

    “When this shooting happened, the response of our officers and detectives was fast, brave, and highly coordinated. It speaks to the calibre of this great department and our law enforcement partners.”

    Detectives working to thoroughly investigate
    The SLCPD said about 8pm, members of its Violent Criminal Apprehension Team (VCAT) and Gang Unit were flagged down near 102 South 200 East, where officers found a man crouching among a group of people with a gunshot wound.

    The man is identified as 24-year-old Arturo Gamboa, who was dressed in all black clothing and wearing a black mask.

    “As officers approached, community members pointed out a nearby firearm, which was described as an AR15-style rifle.

    “Officers also located a gas mask, black clothing, and a backpack in close proximity. The items were collected and processed by the SLCPD Crime Lab.

    “Paramedics took Gamboa to the hospital. Detectives later booked Gamboa into the Salt Lake County Metro Jail on a charge of murder.

    Police said officers also detained two men who were wearing high-visibility neon green vests and carrying handguns.

    Peacekeeping team
    These men were apparently part of the event’s peacekeeping team.

    According to the police, detectives learned during interviews that the two peacekeepers saw Gamboa move away from the crowd and move into a secluded area behind a wall — behavior they found suspicious.

    “One of the peacekeepers told detectives he saw Gamboa pull out an AR15-style rifle from a backpack and begin manipulating it.

    “The peacekeepers drew their firearms and ordered Gamboa to drop the weapon.

    “Witnesses reported Gamboa instead lifted the rifle and began running toward the crowd gathered on State Street, holding the weapon in a firing position.

    “In response, one of the peacekeepers fired three rounds. One round struck Gamboa, while another tragically wounded Mr Ah Loo.”

    “Our detectives are now working to thoroughly investigate the circumstances surrounding this incident,” Redd said.

    “We will not allow this individual act to create fear in our community.”

    This article is republished under a community partnership agreement with RNZ.

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-Evening Report: Samoan fashion designer fatally shot at Salt Lake City ‘no kings’ protest

    RNZ Pacific

    A renowned Samoan fashion designer was fatally shot at the “No Kings” protest in Salt Lake City on Saturday, the Salt Lake City Police Department (SLCPD) has confirmed.

    Arthur Folasa Ah Loo, known as Afa Ah Loo, an “innocent bystander” at the protest, died despite efforts by paramedics to save his life, police said.

    Ah Loo, a Utah resident, died at the hospital. The Utah Office of the Medical Examiner will determine the official cause and manner of death.

    The SLPCD said the incident began about 7.56pm local time when a sergeant assigned to the SLCPD Motor Squad reported hearing gunfire near 151 South State Street.

    It said the sergeant and his squad were working to facilitate traffic and help to ensure public safety during a permitted demonstration that drew an estimated 10,000 participants.

    “As panic spread throughout the area, hundreds of people ran for safety, hiding in parking garages, behind barriers, and going into nearby businesses.

    “The first officers on scene notified SLCPD’s incident management team using their police radios.”

    The SLCPD said officers quickly moved in to secure the scene and search for any active threats and found a man who had been shot and immediately began life-saving efforts.

    “Our thoughts are with the family and friends of the 39-year-old man who was killed, and with the many community members who were impacted by this traumatic incident,” Salt Lake City police chief Brian Redd said.

    “When this shooting happened, the response of our officers and detectives was fast, brave, and highly coordinated. It speaks to the calibre of this great department and our law enforcement partners.”

    Detectives working to thoroughly investigate
    The SLCPD said about 8pm, members of its Violent Criminal Apprehension Team (VCAT) and Gang Unit were flagged down near 102 South 200 East, where officers found a man crouching among a group of people with a gunshot wound.

    The man is identified as 24-year-old Arturo Gamboa, who was dressed in all black clothing and wearing a black mask.

    “As officers approached, community members pointed out a nearby firearm, which was described as an AR15-style rifle.

    “Officers also located a gas mask, black clothing, and a backpack in close proximity. The items were collected and processed by the SLCPD Crime Lab.

    “Paramedics took Gamboa to the hospital. Detectives later booked Gamboa into the Salt Lake County Metro Jail on a charge of murder.

    Police said officers also detained two men who were wearing high-visibility neon green vests and carrying handguns.

    Peacekeeping team
    These men were apparently part of the event’s peacekeeping team.

    According to the police, detectives learned during interviews that the two peacekeepers saw Gamboa move away from the crowd and move into a secluded area behind a wall — behavior they found suspicious.

    “One of the peacekeepers told detectives he saw Gamboa pull out an AR15-style rifle from a backpack and begin manipulating it.

    “The peacekeepers drew their firearms and ordered Gamboa to drop the weapon.

    “Witnesses reported Gamboa instead lifted the rifle and began running toward the crowd gathered on State Street, holding the weapon in a firing position.

    “In response, one of the peacekeepers fired three rounds. One round struck Gamboa, while another tragically wounded Mr Ah Loo.”

    “Our detectives are now working to thoroughly investigate the circumstances surrounding this incident,” Redd said.

    “We will not allow this individual act to create fear in our community.”

    This article is republished under a community partnership agreement with RNZ.

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Hundreds of thousands of homes and businesses to benefit from largest flood defence investment programme in history

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    Press release

    Hundreds of thousands of homes and businesses to benefit from largest flood defence investment programme in history

    Almost £8 billion to be invested in flood defences over the next decade

    A photo of flood defences by the sea

    The largest flooding programme in history will be announced by government this week, with a record £7.9 billion committed over ten years to protect hundreds of thousands of homes, small businesses, and vital infrastructure from the growing threat of flooding. 

    From high-performance flood barriers to nature-based solutions like wetland restoration, the programme will deliver long-term protection for communities and strengthen local economies – delivering on the government’s Plan for Change.

    This comes as the government gears up to announcing its landmark Infrastructure Strategy – a targeted, long-term plan to invest in Britain. The Strategy focuses on ensuring every penny of taxpayer money spent delivers real returns for working people, through stronger local economies, better jobs and more resilient communities.

    The new flooding programme is proof of that strategy in action. Every £1 spent on flood defences expected to prevent around £8 in economic damage, meaning significant savings for public services, such as the NHS and schools.

    The major funding pledge will bolster the government’s mission of accelerating economic growth, by reducing the time and costs businesses face when recovering from floods and empowering them to invest in local areas.

    Environment Secretary Steve Reed said:

    Protecting citizens is the first duty of any Government. Yet we inherited crumbling flood defences in their worst condition on record – exposing thousands of homes.

    Under the Plan for Change, this Government is taking urgent action with the largest flooding programme in our country’s history.

    We will leave no stone unturned to protect our citizens.  

    Philip Duffy, chief executive at the Environment Agency, said:

    As our changing climate continues to bring more extreme weather to the nation, it’s never been more vital to invest in new flood defences and repair our existing assets.

    This long-term investment will be welcome news for businesses and homeowners, who have too often faced the destructive nature of flooding. Our priority will continue to be working with the government and local authorities to ensure as many properties are protected as possible.

    The investment will also continue the government’s plans to protect cities and towns from the devastating impacts of floodings, including from Oxford to Portsmouth and up to Derby and Blackpool.

    In the Spending Review, the Government also confirmed that £4.2 billion will be spent on the flooding programme over the next three years (2026/7 to 2028/9), which will be focused on both capital and resources such as building new defences and repairing and maintaining existing ones.

    Alongside this, the Government launched a consultation on new proposals to introduce a simplified, more transparent approach to bid for government funding for flood defences. This will benefit councils that have less resource to commit to the application process and will ensure money is distributed more effectively across the country.

    Updates to this page

    Published 16 June 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Nations: Migrants and Diaspora Drive Development Through Remittance Flows

    Source: International Organization for Migration (IOM)

    Geneva, 16 June 2025 – Against a backdrop of economic uncertainty, conflict, and rising inequality, one financial flow has remained remarkably steady: the money migrants send home. On the International Day of Family Remittances, the International Organization for Migration (IOM) celebrates the powerful role of migrants and diaspora communities in supporting families and driving development worldwide through remittance flows. 

    “When migrants send money home, they are doing far more than providing for their families,” said IOM Director General Amy Pope. “They are building stronger communities, boosting local economies, and helping entire regions recover and grow. Remittances support children’s education, allow women to start businesses, and provide a vital cushion in times of crisis. When invested wisely, they are a powerful tool for development that benefits both countries of origin and destination.” 

    In 2024 alone, migrants sent an estimated USD 700 billion to low- and middle-income countries. These transfers now surpass official development assistance and foreign direct investment to those same countries, making remittances one of the most dependable sources of external financing. 

    More than just lifelines, remittances enable families to meet essential needs, from food and housing to education and healthcare. They also help communities recover and rebuild, supporting job creation, small businesses, and economic resilience, especially in areas affected by conflict and displacement. 

    Beyond their impact on families and communities back home, remittances also support host communities by stimulating local economies and strengthening social ties. Migrants provide a vital workforce for host countries, meeting labor gaps, and bolstering economic growth, creating a win-win situation.

    IOM works globally to expand access to financial services, promote safe and regular migration pathways, and support migrants in contributing meaningfully to both their countries of origin and destination. 

    Despite their impact, remittance flows are often hindered by high transfer costs and limited access to financial services. IOM continues to advocate for lower transaction fees, expanded digital and financial tools, safer and regular migration pathways, and greater inclusion of diaspora communities in national development strategies. 

    As the international community prepares for the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in Seville, IOM calls on governments, financial institutions, and development partners to work together to create a supportive environment for remittances. Unlocking the full potential of these financial flows will help ensure that they contribute meaningfully to the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals. 

    MIL OSI United Nations News

  • MIL-OSI United Nations: Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women Opens Ninety-First Session in Geneva

    Source: United Nations – Geneva

    The Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women this morning opened its ninety-first session, hearing a statement from a representative of the Secretary-General and adopting its agenda and programme of work for the session.  During the session, the Committee will review the reports of Afghanistan, Botswana, Chad, Ireland, Mexico, San Marino and Thailand, and adopt concluding observations on the reports of Fiji, Solomon Islands and Tuvalu, which it reviewed during a technical cooperation session held in Fiji in April.

    Andrea Ori, Chief of the Groups in Focus Section, Human Rights Council and Treaty Mechanisms Division, Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, and Representative of the Secretary-General, said he was pleased to announce the opening of the session, after the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights was able to confirm it only last month due to the ongoing liquidity crisis affecting the United Nations.

    Mr. Ori said this year marked the twenty-fifth anniversary of Security Council resolution 1325 of 31 October 2000, a landmark document that recognised the disproportionate impact of conflicts on women and girls and the crucial role of women in conflict prevention, conflict management and sustainable peace efforts.

    Noting with concern that some 120 conflicts were currently affecting civilians and communities worldwide, and that women and girls were primarily targeted by gender-based violence as a tactic of war, Mr. Ori commended the Committee on its work to update general recommendation 30, which provided authoritative guidance to States parties on concrete measures to ensure that women’s rights were protected before, during and after conflict.

    Mr. Ori also announced with regret that the global funding crisis was affecting the Committee’s work directly. Due to the lack of funding, the Office of the High Commissioner was planning and operating under the assumption that no Committee would have a third session.

    He concluded by thanking the Committee for its unwavering commitment and dedication to advancing women’s rights and wished it a successful and productive session.

    Nahla Haidar, Committee Chairperson, said that the Committee was meeting in one of the most challenging times for the multilateral system, amidst devastating conflicts, a weakening of the rule of law, and scarce resources.  Human rights mechanisms needed to be protected more than ever for the benefit of all stakeholders.

    During the meeting, the Chair and Committee Experts discussed the activities they had undertaken since the last session.  Bandana Rana, on behalf of Brenda Akia, Committee Rapporteur and Chairperson of the Pre-Sessional Working Group, and Jelena Pia-Comella, Committee Rapporteur on follow-up to concluding observations, also briefed the Committee on their work.

    The Committee’s ninety-first session is being held from 16 June to 4 July.  All documents relating to the Committee’s work, including reports submitted by States parties, can be found on the session’s webpage.  Meeting summary releases can be found here.  The webcast of the Committee’s public meetings can be accessed via the UN Web TV webpage

    The Committee will next meet at 3 p.m. this today, Monday, 16 June, with the representatives of national human rights institutions and non-governmental organizations of Mexico, Thailand and Ireland, whose reports will be reviewed this week. 

    Opening Statement

    ANDREA ORI, Chief of the Groups in Focus Section, Human Rights Council and Treaty Mechanisms Division, Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, and Representative of the Secretary-General, said he was pleased to announce the opening of the session, after the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights was able to confirm it only last month due to the ongoing liquidity crisis affecting the United Nations.  The Committee’s pre-sessional working group, scheduled to be held after this session, and the sessions of both Optional Protocol Working Groups directly preceding this session were cancelled due to lack of funding.

    This year marked the twenty-fifth anniversary of Security Council resolution 1325 of 31 October 2000, a landmark document that recognised the disproportionate impact of conflicts on women and girls and the crucial role of women in conflict prevention, conflict management and sustainable peace efforts, reflecting international human rights norms.

    Some 120 conflicts were affecting civilians and communities worldwide, and women and girls were primarily targeted by gender-based violence, in particular sexual violence, as a tactic of war to humiliate, dominate, instil fear in, and displace communities.  Situations of insecurity, organised violence and armed conflicts exacerbated pre-existing gender inequalities and placed women and girls at an increased risk of gender-based violence.  Mr. Ori commended the Committee on its work to update general recommendation 30 on women in conflict prevention, conflict and post-conflict situations, which provided authoritative guidance to States parties on concrete measures to ensure that women’s rights were protected before, during and after conflict, and highlighted the importance of women’s meaningful participation in conflict prevention, resolution and peacebuilding.

    Mr. Ori welcomed that the Committee’s Chair would participate in the first panel of the 2025 annual full-day discussion on the human rights of women at the fifty-ninth session of the Human Rights Council, to be held on 24 June 2025 under the theme “Gender-based violence against women and girls in conflict, post-conflict and humanitarian settings”.  The second panel of the Council’s annual full-day discussion would focus on the theme “Commemoration of the International Day of Women in Diplomacy focusing on overcoming barriers to women’s leadership in peace processes”.  

    Mr. Ori said the global funding crisis was affecting the Committee’s work directly.  It was highly likely that, for those treaty bodies with three annual sessions, the Office of the High Commissioner would not be able to secure the funding to hold their third session.  The Office was therefore planning and operating under the assumption that no Committee would have a third session. The Office had received only 73 per cent of its approved regular budget in 2025, and 87 per cent of its approved regular budget in 2024. 

    The United Nations Office at Geneva’s conference services had also adopted cash conservation measures, which would impact the conference support provided to the United Nations human rights treaty bodies, with an overall reduction of 10 per cent.  With further reduction of the allotment, the mandated activities of treaty bodies would be even more affected in 2025 than in 2024. This would impact the treaty bodies’ ability to hold dialogues with States parties and to take decisions on individual communications, resulting in further delays and backlogs, and the Office was obliged to significantly reduce treaty body capacity building activities. 

    All this caused real damage to predictability, which was so important for States, civil society organizations and rights-holders to engage with treaty bodies.  Given the overall reduction in funds and availability of support services, “business as usual” was no longer possible and the treaty bodies needed to plan on “doing less with less”.

    The thirty-seventh annual meeting of Chairpersons of human rights treaty bodies was able to meet in Geneva from 2 to 6 June.  The Chairs dedicated the meeting to the liquidity crisis, which was affecting the very existence of treaty bodies, and to discussing what could be done to increase predictability under the current financial and human constraints. 

    Mr. Ori said he was aware that the Committee had a heavy programme ahead for the next three weeks, including constructive dialogues with eight States parties, the consideration of several individual communications, and the adoption of an addendum to general recommendation 30 on women in conflict prevention, conflict and post-conflict situations.  He concluded by thanking the Committee for its unwavering commitment and dedication to advancing women’s rights and wished it a successful and productive session.

    Questions by Committee Experts

    A Committee Expert said that more than 123 million people were currently displaced worldwide due to conflict situations, the majority of whom were women and children.  What could be the role of the United Nations in the future if it could not prevent these conflicts?

    Another Committee Expert asked why tens of countries were not providing the funds they had promised to provide. Was the United Nations considering reassessing its priorities to ensure that the Committee could hold three sessions each year?

    A Committee Expert said that the members of the Committee did not take the current situation lightly.  It was a grand shame and a disgust.  How could Member States let this happen?

    A Committee Expert said that reducing the activities of the treaty bodies would further silence them at this important moment.  Human rights systems needed to be reenforced, and this required resourcing.  How could this silencing be prevented?

    NAHLA HAIDAR, Committee Chairperson, said that it was unacceptable that the work of the treaty bodies was becoming less and less visible.  The Committee hoped that something would happen that would allow it to hold its third session in September.

    Responses by the Representative of the Secretary-General

    ANDREA ORI, Chief of the Groups in Focus Section, Human Rights Treaties Branch, Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, and Representative of the Secretary-General, said the Office of the High Commissioner shared the Committee’s concerns. This was a turning point in multilateralism and in international law.  There were more than 120 conflicts in the world, the primary victims of which were women and children.  Authoritarian regimes were taking advantage of and working to weaken the multilateral system.

    Some 40 per cent of the United Nations’ regular budget depended on two States.  If one of those States decided not to pay its dues, that shook the entire Organization.  This was a major factor in the instability of the United Nations system.  The Secretary-General was working to reform the system through the “UN80” initiative, looking for solutions that kept it functioning with limited resources.

    The UN80 initiative was focused on reform.  This was an opportunity to reform the whole system rationally, to allow it to meet the challenges of today.  As part of the initiative, the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights was merging and regionalising its functions.  The Office was thinking optimistically but planning for the worst. It needed to be proactive rather than reactive and consider alternatives to stabilise the human rights system. The Committee also needed to consider alternative ways of carrying out its activities and reviewing States parties. Together, the Office and the Committee could find solutions for the challenges they faced by taking proactive decisions.

    Statements by Committee Experts

    NAHLA HAIDAR, Committee Chairperson, said that the Committee had taken decisions to increase the production of lists of issues prior to reporting.  The United Nations system needed to not be reactive, and UN80 needed to implement thoughtful rather than patchwork reforms.

    The Committee was meeting in one of the most challenging times for the multilateral system, amidst devastating conflicts, a weakening of the rule of law, and scarce resources.  Human rights mechanisms needed to be protected more than ever for the benefit of all stakeholders.

    Since the last session, the number of States parties that had ratified the Convention had remained at 189.  On 15 May 2025, San Marino accepted the amendment to article 20, paragraph one of the Convention concerning the Committee’s meeting time, bringing the total number of States parties having accepted the amendment to 82.  A total of 126 States parties to the Convention were currently required to accept the amendment for it to enter into force.  The number of States parties that had ratified the Optional Protocol remained at 115, but Estonia was in the process of ratification.

    Ms. Haidar said she was pleased to inform that since the last session, Afghanistan, Australia, Cyprus and Guinea-Bissau had submitted their periodic reports to the Committee.  The interim government of Syria had decided to withdraw the combined third and fourth periodic reports that had been submitted by the previous regime and submit a new report under the traditional reporting procedure.  The total number of States parties that had opted out from the simplified reporting procedure since the 2022 decision to make the simplified reporting procedure the default procedure remained at 13. 

    The Committee adopted its agenda and programme of work for the session, and Ms. Haidar and Committee Experts discussed the activities they had undertaken since the last session. 

    BANDANA RANA, on behalf of BRENDA AKIA, Committee Rapporteur and Chair of the Pre-Sessional Working Group, introduced the report of the pre-sessional Working Group for the ninety-first session, which met from 28 October to 1 November 2024 in Geneva.

    The Working Group prepared lists of issues and questions in relation to the reports of Botswana, Cabo Verde, Czech Republic, El Salvador and Lesotho, in addition to lists of issues and questions prior to the submission of the reports of Equatorial Guinea, Libya and Malta under the simplified reporting procedure.  The pre-sessional Working Group had the reports of these States parties, except for those of Equatorial Guinea, Libya and Malta, to be submitted in response to the respective lists of issues prior to reporting.  It further had before it the general recommendations adopted by the Committee; draft lists of issues and questions and lists of issues prior to reporting prepared by the Secretariat; and other pertinent information, including concluding observations of the Committee and other treaty bodies.  In preparing the lists, the Working Group paid particular attention to the States parties’ follow-up to the concluding observations of the Committee on their previous reports.  The Working Group benefited from written and oral information submitted by entities of the United Nations system and non-governmental organizations, as well as by national human rights institutions.  The lists of issues and questions and lists of issues prior to reporting adopted by the Working Group were transmitted to the States parties concerned.

    NAHLA HAIDAR, Committee Chairperson, said that, in light of the backlog of State party reports pending consideration by the Committee accumulated during the COVID-19 pandemic, the Committee had decided to postpone the consideration of the States parties referred to in the report of the pre-sessional Working Group to future sessions, with the exception of Botswana.  The Committee instead decided to, during the present session, consider the reports of Afghanistan, Botswana, Chad, Ireland, Mexico, San Marino and Thailand, and adopt concluding observations on Fiji, Solomon Islands and Tuvalu, following country exchanges held during the Pacific technical cooperation session in Suva, Fiji from 7 to 11 April 2025.

    JELENA PIA-COMELLA, Committee Rapporteur on follow-up to concluding observations, briefed the Committee on the status of the follow-up reports received in response to the Committee’s concluding observations.  She said that at the end of the Committee’s ninetieth session, follow-up letters outlining the outcomes of assessments of follow-up reports were sent to Belgium, Gambia, Portugal, Sweden and Switzerland.  Reminders were sent to Honduras, Saint Kitts and Nevis, and Ukraine, as their follow-up reports were scheduled for consideration at the ninetieth session but had not been received.  Ukraine’s report had since been received and would be scheduled for assessment by the Committee at its ninety-second session in October 2025.

    For the present session, the Committee would consider follow-up reports from Finland and Georgia, both received on time; Bahrain and Norway, received with a one-month delay; Armenia, with more than two months’ delay; and Mongolia, Namibia and the United Arab Emirates with more than five months’ delay.  Reminders regarding the submission of follow-up reports would be sent to Costa Rica, Hungary and Mauritania.

    ___________

    Produced by the United Nations Information Service in Geneva for use of the media; 
    not an official record. English and French versions of our releases are different as they are the product of two separate coverage teams that work independently.

     

    CEDAW25.011E

    MIL OSI United Nations News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Johnson’s Jason Foster Recognized for New Technology Reporting Record

    Source: NASA

    Heading into a recent staff meeting for Johnson Space Center’s Business Development & Technology Integration Office, Jason Foster anticipated a typical agenda of team updates and discussion. He did not expect an announcement that he had been named a 2025 Rookie of the Year – Honorable Mention through the Federal Laboratory Consortium’s annual awards program.
    Foster was one of only three technology transfer professionals across the federal government to be recognized in the Rookie of the Year category, which is open to early-career individuals with less than three years of experience. “It was definitely a surprise,” he said. “It was quite an honor, because it’s not only representing Johnson Space Center but also NASA.”

    Foster is a licensing specialist and New Technology Report (NTR) specialist within Johnson’s Technology Transfer Office in Houston. That team works to ensure that innovations developed for aeronautics and space exploration are made broadly available to the public, maximizing their benefit to the nation. Foster’s role involves both capturing new technologies developed at Johnson and marketing and licensing those technologies to companies that would like to use and further develop them.
    He describes much of his work as “technology hunting” – reaching out to branches, offices, and teams across Johnson to teach them about the Technology Transfer Office, NTRs, and the value of technology reporting for NASA and the public. “NTRs are the foundation that allows our office to do our job,” he said. “We need to know about a technology in order to transfer it.”

    Foster’s efforts to streamline and strengthen the reporting and patenting of Johnson’s innovations led to his recognition by the consortium. His proactive outreach and relationship-building improved customer service and contributed to 158 NTRs in fiscal year 2024 – the highest number of NTRs disclosed by federal employees at any NASA center. Foster also proposed a three-month NTR sprint, during which he led a team of seven in an intensive exercise to identify and report new technologies. This initiative not only cleared a backlog of leads for the office, but also resulted in more than 120 previously undisclosed NTRs. “We are still using that process now as we continue processing NTRs,” Foster said. On top of those achievements, he helped secure the highest recorded number of license agreements with commercial entities in the center’s history, with 41 licenses executed in fiscal year 2024.
    “I am very proud of my accomplishments, none of it would be possible without the open-mindedness and continuous support of my incredible team,” Foster said. “They have always provided a space to grow, and actively welcome innovation in our processes and workflows.”

    A self-described “space nerd,” Foster said he always envisioned working at NASA, but not until much later in his career – ideally as an astronaut. He initially planned to pursue an astrophysics degree but discovered a passion for engineering and fused that with his love of space by studying aerospace, aeronautical, and astronautical engineering instead. In his last semester of college at California Polytechnic State University of San Luis Obispo, he landed a Universities Space Research Association internship at Johnson, supporting flight software development for crew exercise systems on the International Space Station and future exploration missions. “I got really involved in the Johnson Space Center team and the work, and I thought, what if I joined NASA now?”
    He was hired as a licensing specialist on the Technology Transfer team under the JETS II Contract as an Amentum employee shortly after graduating and continually seeks new opportunities to expand his role and skillsets. “The more I can learn about anything NASA’s doing is incredible,” he said. “I found myself in this perfect position where literally my job is to learn everything there is to learn.”

    Foster celebrates three years with NASA this July. In his time at the agency, he has learned the value of getting to know and understand your colleagues’ needs in order to help them. Before he meets with someone, he takes time to learn about the organization or team they are a part of, the work they are involved in, and what they might discuss. It is also important to determine how each person prefers to communicate and collaborate. “Doing your homework pays dividends,” Foster said. He has found that being as prepared as possible opens doors to more opportunities, and it helps to save valuable time for busy team members.

    When he is not technology hunting, you might find Foster practicing the art of fire spinning. He picked up the hobby in college, joining a club that met at local beaches to practice spinning and capturing different geometric patterns through long exposure photos. “It was kind of a strange thing to get into, but it was really fun,” he said. His love of learning drives his interest in other activities as well. Gardening is a relatively new hobby inspired by a realization that he had never grown anything before.   
    “It’s a genuine joy, I think, coming across something with curiosity and wanting to learn from it,” he said. “I think it especially helps in my job, where your curiosity switch has to be on at least 90% of the time.”

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI: Castellum Announces Closing of $5.0 Million Public Offering of Common Stock and Warrants

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    VIENNA, Va., June 16, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Castellum, Inc. (the “Company” and “Castellum”) (NYSE-American: CTM), a cybersecurity, electronic warfare, and software services company focused on the federal government, today announced the closing of its previously announced public offering of 4,166,667 Units at a public offering price of $1.20 per Unit. Each unit consists of one share of common stock and one warrant to purchase one share of common stock. The warrants are immediately exercisable at $1.22 per share and will expire 60 days from the date of issuance. The shares of common stock and warrants are immediately separable and were issued separately.

    Gross proceeds from the offering are approximately $5.0 million before deducting placement agent fees and offering expenses. Castellum intends to use the net proceeds of the offering for working capital and general corporate purposes.

    Maxim Group LLC acted as the sole placement agent on a reasonable best-efforts basis for the offering.

    A shelf registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-284205) relating to the securities being offered was previously filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and became effective on January 24, 2025. The shares of common stock and shares underlying the warrants were offered only by means of a prospectus. A preliminary prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus relating to and describing the terms of the public offering have been filed with the SEC. A final prospectus supplement and an accompanying prospectus relating to the offering has been with the SEC and is available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. Copies of the final prospectus supplement and accompanying prospectus relating to the public offering may be obtained by contacting Maxim Group LLC, at 300 Park Avenue, 16th Floor, New York, NY 10022, Attention: Prospectus Department, or by telephone at (212) 895-3745 or by email at syndicate@maximgrp.com.

    This press release does not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy these securities, nor shall there be any sale of these securities in any state or other jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful prior to the registration or qualification under the securities laws of any such state or other jurisdiction.

    About Castellum, Inc. (NYSE-American: CTM):

    Castellum, Inc. (NYSE-American: CTM) is a cybersecurity, electronic warfare, and software engineering services company focused on the federal government – https://castellumus.com/.

    Forward-Looking Statements:

    This release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. All forward-looking statements are inherently uncertain, based on current expectations and assumptions concerning future events or future performance of the company. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which are only predictions and speak only as of the date hereof. Words such as “will,” “would,” “believe,” and “expects,” and similar language or phrasing are indicative of forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties, and other factors, many of which are outside of the Company’s control, that could cause actual results to differ (sometimes materially) from the results expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements, including, among others: the Company’s ability to effectively integrate and grow its acquired companies; its ability to identify additional acquisition targets and close additional acquisitions; the impact on the Company’s revenue due to a delay in the U.S. Congress approving a federal budget, operating under a prolonged continuing resolution, government shutdown, or breach of the debt ceiling, as well as the imposition by the U.S. government of sequestration in the absence of an approved budget; the ability of the U.S. federal government to unilaterally cancel a contract with or without cause, and more specifically, the potential impact of the U.S. DOGE Service Temporary Organization on government spending and terminating contracts for convenience. In evaluating such statements, prospective investors should review carefully various risks and uncertainties identified in Item 1A. “Risk Factors” section of the Company’s recently filed Form 10-Q, Item 1A. “Risk Factors” in the Company’s most recent Form 10-K, and other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission which can be viewed at www.sec.gov. These risks and uncertainties, or not closing the described potential equity financing in this press release, could cause the Company’s actual results to differ materially from those indicated in the forward-looking statements. Except to the extent required by law, we undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, a change in events, conditions, circumstances or assumptions underlying such statements, or otherwise.

    Contact:

    Glen Ives
    President and Chief Executive Officer
    Phone: (703) 752-6157
    info@castellumus.com
    https://castellumus.com

    A photo accompanying this announcement is available at https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/216bfa30-3c99-4e23-a43d-7b58f9f7803b

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI: Castellum Announces Closing of $5.0 Million Public Offering of Common Stock and Warrants

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    VIENNA, Va., June 16, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Castellum, Inc. (the “Company” and “Castellum”) (NYSE-American: CTM), a cybersecurity, electronic warfare, and software services company focused on the federal government, today announced the closing of its previously announced public offering of 4,166,667 Units at a public offering price of $1.20 per Unit. Each unit consists of one share of common stock and one warrant to purchase one share of common stock. The warrants are immediately exercisable at $1.22 per share and will expire 60 days from the date of issuance. The shares of common stock and warrants are immediately separable and were issued separately.

    Gross proceeds from the offering are approximately $5.0 million before deducting placement agent fees and offering expenses. Castellum intends to use the net proceeds of the offering for working capital and general corporate purposes.

    Maxim Group LLC acted as the sole placement agent on a reasonable best-efforts basis for the offering.

    A shelf registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-284205) relating to the securities being offered was previously filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and became effective on January 24, 2025. The shares of common stock and shares underlying the warrants were offered only by means of a prospectus. A preliminary prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus relating to and describing the terms of the public offering have been filed with the SEC. A final prospectus supplement and an accompanying prospectus relating to the offering has been with the SEC and is available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. Copies of the final prospectus supplement and accompanying prospectus relating to the public offering may be obtained by contacting Maxim Group LLC, at 300 Park Avenue, 16th Floor, New York, NY 10022, Attention: Prospectus Department, or by telephone at (212) 895-3745 or by email at syndicate@maximgrp.com.

    This press release does not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy these securities, nor shall there be any sale of these securities in any state or other jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful prior to the registration or qualification under the securities laws of any such state or other jurisdiction.

    About Castellum, Inc. (NYSE-American: CTM):

    Castellum, Inc. (NYSE-American: CTM) is a cybersecurity, electronic warfare, and software engineering services company focused on the federal government – https://castellumus.com/.

    Forward-Looking Statements:

    This release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. All forward-looking statements are inherently uncertain, based on current expectations and assumptions concerning future events or future performance of the company. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which are only predictions and speak only as of the date hereof. Words such as “will,” “would,” “believe,” and “expects,” and similar language or phrasing are indicative of forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties, and other factors, many of which are outside of the Company’s control, that could cause actual results to differ (sometimes materially) from the results expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements, including, among others: the Company’s ability to effectively integrate and grow its acquired companies; its ability to identify additional acquisition targets and close additional acquisitions; the impact on the Company’s revenue due to a delay in the U.S. Congress approving a federal budget, operating under a prolonged continuing resolution, government shutdown, or breach of the debt ceiling, as well as the imposition by the U.S. government of sequestration in the absence of an approved budget; the ability of the U.S. federal government to unilaterally cancel a contract with or without cause, and more specifically, the potential impact of the U.S. DOGE Service Temporary Organization on government spending and terminating contracts for convenience. In evaluating such statements, prospective investors should review carefully various risks and uncertainties identified in Item 1A. “Risk Factors” section of the Company’s recently filed Form 10-Q, Item 1A. “Risk Factors” in the Company’s most recent Form 10-K, and other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission which can be viewed at www.sec.gov. These risks and uncertainties, or not closing the described potential equity financing in this press release, could cause the Company’s actual results to differ materially from those indicated in the forward-looking statements. Except to the extent required by law, we undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, a change in events, conditions, circumstances or assumptions underlying such statements, or otherwise.

    Contact:

    Glen Ives
    President and Chief Executive Officer
    Phone: (703) 752-6157
    info@castellumus.com
    https://castellumus.com

    A photo accompanying this announcement is available at https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/216bfa30-3c99-4e23-a43d-7b58f9f7803b

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI Economics: Luis de Guindos: Interview with Reuters

    Source: European Central Bank

    Interview with Luis de Guindos, Vice-President of the ECB, conducted by Balázs Korányi and Francesco Cánepa on 12 June 2025

    16 June 2025

    President Lagarde said the ECB was in a good place now. Investors and ECB watchers took that to mean a pause in rate cuts is appropriate. Was that the correct interpretation?

    The projections provide the key to understanding our policy decision. It’s almost a cliché now but the level of uncertainty is huge. So much so, we published alternative scenarios. The key differences in the scenarios relate to trade policy. In the baseline, we assume no retaliation and a 10% tariff. In the adverse scenario, we assume higher tariffs and retaliation.

    The final outcome in trade negotiations is by far the most relevant factor of uncertainty that we considered in our projections, which are the basis for our monetary policy decisions. Nobody knows the final outcome of the trade negotiations and the impact it may have on the outlook for growth and inflation.

    Having said that, markets have understood perfectly well what the President said about being in a good position. Even in this context of huge uncertainty, I think that markets believe and discount that we are very close to our target of sustainable 2% inflation over the medium term.

    Your projections incorporate interest rate futures, which still price in one more rate cut. So, if the baseline materialises, we can still expect a cut?

    We incorporate market expectations for interest rates into the underlying assumptions of our projection framework. But I think that, in this case, this assumption is not important compared with the consideration we give to trade issues in the June exercise. Trade has a greater magnitude of relevance in influencing our projections.

    Would you say that risks to the inflation outlook are to the upside or the downside?

    This is quite an important question. A tariff is a tax on imported goods. So the first impact is inflationary. But tariffs simultaneously depress demand, which can more than compensate for the initial inflationary impact. So, in the medium term, tariffs reduce both growth and inflation.

    But there is another factor that is more difficult to calibrate. A fully fledged trade war could give rise to fragmentation in the global economy and distortions in the global supply chain. And that would be inflationary in the longer term.

    So, with all these nuances, over the next two years tariffs would reduce both growth and inflation. But, if you look further out, you have to consider the potential impact that fragmentation could have. That goes beyond our projection horizon, but it is something that we will have to take into consideration in the future.

    You now project inflation dipping below target and then coming back to 2%. We’ve seen such a scenario before, when the longer-term projection always points to 2%, partly because of mean reversion. So, how much weight do you attach to the 2027 projection? And do you give a lot of thought to this notion of mean reversion as a feature at the back of the projection?

    When it comes to 2026, there are two key issues: the appreciation of the euro and the evolution of prices of raw materials, particularly energy. For 2027 a similar appreciation of the currency and a fall in energy prices is not expected to take place, and that is the reason why we expect inflation to come back up to 2%. But, of course, the level of uncertainty is huge. So, even though we are convinced that inflation will converge to our target, we need to stay data-dependent and decide meeting by meeting. Also, bear in mind that we have already reduced interest rates by 200 basis points – from 4% to 2%.

    The risk of undershooting in any year is that it influences wage-setting and could perpetuate low inflation. In the first quarter of next year, you see inflation at 1.4%. Do you consider undershooting a significant risk?

    I think inflation is going in the right direction. There is a clear deceleration, also confirmed by the latest data. But I don’t think that inflation hovering around 1.4% in the first quarter of 2026 is going to be enough to unanchor inflation expectations and modify the wage bargaining process. We clearly see that wage dynamics are cooling. But, even when you take all these factors into consideration, compensation per employee will be around 3% over time. So, the risk of undershooting is very limited in my view.

    Our assessment is that risks for inflation are balanced. Clearly, 1.4% is below target. But we look at the medium term, and in the medium term there are other factors that can compensate for the short-term elements that can temporarily bring inflation down.

    Europe is expected to spend more on defence. Do you think that greater military expenditure should come at the expense of other spending, or should it be financed from debt?

    A lot of uncertainty still surrounds our fiscal policy assumptions and projections. Trade is prominently in the news, but fiscal policy is often overlooked.

    First of all, fiscal policy in the United States is important. The new tax bill is going to increase the deficit, and the US fiscal position is already challenging. The debt ratio is over 100% and the fiscal deficit between 6% and 7%. So, markets are likely to start paying more attention to fiscal policy in the United States, which could give rise to increasing yields. I think this will catch the eye of markets more and more in the future.

    In the case of Europe, we have seen a degree of decoupling in terms of yields with respect to the United States. But developments have been much more moderate.

    Nevertheless, fiscal policy is relevant because there is an additional need to increase spending on defence, which is going to demand more resources. The starting point for some EU countries is not good. The EU does not have much fiscal space, so we have to look for social and political space in order to expand it.

    We will need to have more support from the people of Europe, and governments will have to explain clearly the necessity for higher spending on defence, because it’s a question of independence and autonomy.

    This extra spending may take some time to ramp up. Do you think ECB watchers or the ECB’s own projections overestimate how much fiscal support is coming?

    There are different fiscal multipliers, and much will depend on the kind of fiscal spending that countries are going to pursue. This kind of expenditure takes time to be implemented, so the impact on inflation and growth is not going to be material in the short term.

    Do you think the ECB can play a role in helping that defence spending, like with the targeted QE, targeted TLTRO, or some other tool?

    I can assure you that this is something that we have not discussed.

    We saw in the minutes of the Federal Reserve System’s May meeting that it had extended the swap line with the ECB. Nevertheless, given the political turmoil in the United States, do you think it would be a good exercise to look at scenarios in which US dollar funding dries up? Should the ECB be preparing the financial sector for such a scenario?

    We believe that swap lines with the Federal Reserve are a good instrument in terms of financial stability for both the euro area and the United States. We are fully convinced that the swap lines will be maintained over time because they are positive for both sides and for global financial stability.

    But markets are starting to openly doubt the status of the US dollar as the world’s leading reserve currency. And some central banks are even building up reserves in gold. Do you think it would be prudent for the ECB, and the Eurosystem more generally, also to start building up more gold reserves or reserves in assets other than US dollar-denominated assets?

    The weight of gold in our reserves has been on the increase clearly because of rising gold prices. Central banks use gold as an instrument to diversify in moments of geopolitical risk, and that is understandable. Some are even looking at silver or platinum to diversify.

    But the role of the US dollar as a reserve currency in the short term is not going to be challenged, in my opinion.

    The role of the euro as a reserve currency in the global arena will depend on actions taken in Europe. If we can achieve a much more integrated goods and services market, then the capital markets union and the banking union will come about much more easily. It’s very difficult to make progress in the capital markets union or the banking union if you do not advance in the integration of the goods and services market.

    You put out a report on the role of the euro last week, which covers basically to the end of last year. Can you provide us with a bit of insight on what’s been happening since 2 April. There’s been a lot of movement on financial markets. Have euro assets really benefited from capital leaving the US dollar, or is it mostly gold that has benefited?

    If you look at market developments, we had a big decline and a risk-off movement at the beginning of April. And now market valuations have fully recovered – apart from the US dollar and commodity prices.

    The policies of the new US Administration cover not only tariffs, but also fiscal policy and the regulatory frameworks for banks – in terms of the implementation of Basel III – and non-banks, and even for crypto assets. At the end of the day, this is a sort of change of paradigm. There have even been some doubts about how engaged the new US Administration is going to be with multilateral institutions.

    Even though markets have recovered, setting aside the US dollar and commodities, there is something that is quite obvious. The correlation of asset prices has changed quite a lot since April. If you look at developments in stock and bond prices, the correlation has been different from the ones we had in the past.

    Even in the case of yields on US Treasuries, we have seen ups and downs. But I think that the main element that indicates some doubts about the new US policies is the evolution of the US dollar. That’s quite clear.

    The flipside of that is that the euro has become stronger. Is it becoming an issue for growth and for exporters? Can the euro zone even afford reserve currency status given the currency strength that comes with it?

    I think that, at USD 1.15, the euro’s exchange rate is not going to be a big obstacle. And the question of the reserve status of the euro in the global arena is not going to have a significant impact in the short term.

    In the short term, the status of the US dollar is not going to be challenged. In the medium term, the factor that is going to be key is the kind of policy that we implement in Europe. If we are able to become more independent, more autonomous in defence, and we start to do what we have to do for the integration of markets… gradually, over the medium to long term, the euro will gain market share. But, in the short term, a big jump in market share is out of the question.

    So you don’t seem to be terribly concerned about USD 1.15 for the real economy. Accepting that you have no exchange rate target, what is the point where you become concerned that the exchange rate has a detrimental impact on the real economy?

    Much more than a specific level, I think that we have to look at the speed of developments, how rapid the appreciation or depreciation is. And if there is a clear overshooting of the exchange rate, that is something we should analyse.

    So far, the evolution has been quite controlled. Perhaps the surprise has been that, at the beginning of the year, most market participants believed that we could go to parity. And instead we have gone to the current level. I would not say that the exchange rate has been extremely volatile so far, or that we have seen a very rapid appreciation .

    We take the exchange rate into consideration in our projections. The perception of the ECB is that the appreciation of the euro has so far been positive in terms of achieving our target for inflation. That’s one of the reasons why we have revised our inflation projections down for 2026.

    A recent paper by Blanchard and Ubide has relaunched the idea of a European safe asset. You were on the other side of the fence when you were once a finance minister. Do you see growing chances of more joint issuance happening?

    Ideas coming from the academic sphere are very good. The one you mentioned is a very interesting proposal for a EU safe asset in a very liquid and deep market. That is something we have to take into consideration.

    But I think we have to do a lot of things before that. We need a much more integrated single market, and to make much more progress towards the capital markets union and the completion of the banking union. Simultaneously – and I feel we have made some progress here – we need the fiscal positions of euro area countries to be closer and disparities to be reduced.

    So it’s an interesting proposal from an academic standpoint. But I think that, from a practical viewpoint, there are other necessary conditions before we get there and these are not yet in place.

    Do you think it could be prudent for the ECB and the Eurosystem’s national central banks to bring back some of the gold reserves they store in New York?

    There is no doubt in my mind that they are totally safe.

    Even when a new Federal Reserve Chair will be appointed next year?

    Well, I don’t know who the next Chair is going to be, but I expect it will be a competent and sensible person.

    Fair enough. But has there been a discussion about this or didn’t it even come up?

    Even the possibility of it didn’t come up.

    Over the past few years, the ECB has learned some lessons, such as that you also have to react forcefully to inflation when it’s too high. This didn’t seem to be a problem a few years ago, yet all of a sudden it was. So, with that in mind, how would you like the new strategy document to reflect that?

    As you have said, the framework for inflation was totally different five years ago. And now we have had a period of high inflation, which was an important change.

    This is going to be a reassessment of our strategy review. In my view, we are not going to see modications in the definition of price stability. With respect to the toolkit, I think that all the instruments are going to remain available for use in the future.

    Simultaneously, we have learned much more about side effects, and we are going to pay more attention to financial stability considerations. QE, for instance, was a new instrument added to the toolkit in 2015. What is important is that when you use an instrument, you can gauge its real impact. Sometimes it’s much easier to start using the instrument than to withdraw it — that’s something we have learned as well. And finally, the framework of the global economy is going to be very different from the one we had in 2021. In one sense, I think we are going to have a much more fragmented world.

    In 2021, we didn’t have any discussions about trade. Deflation, or low inflation, was the main point of our review, and how close we were to the lower bound. At the same time, some academics raised the issue of the natural interest rate. This is interesting from a conceptual and an academic standpoint, but not for actual monetary policy decision-making.

    What should we expect from the new strategy statement?

    I would not expect big surprises. This is about evolution, not revolution. It is just a reassessment. It will be much more focused on how the framework for central banks and for the ECB has changed over the last five years.

    In a multipolar world, what role can China play for the ECB as a partner, and the People’s of Bank of China particularly?

    China is an important player. It’s the world’s second largest economy. We have some monetary arrangements with the central bank, like our swap lines.

    Sometimes when we talk about trade policies, we look only at bilateral tariffs. But we need to have a holistic approach. In the case, for instance, of the negotiations between the United States and Europe, what is going to be key is not only the final outcome in terms of bilateral tariffs, but the potential impact of trade diversion. You need to be holistic with respect to trade, because otherwise, perhaps, you are missing the real impact that these trade negotiations are going to have.

    Do you see that as a big risk, trade diversion? Your colleague Isabel Schnabel seemed to suggest this was not a major risk.

    Well, I don’t know whether it’s going to be a big risk, but undoubtedly this is something that we have to monitor and take into consideration.

    Could the ECB work with the People’s Bank of China, for example in the field of payments? China has its own digital currency.

    We are fully behind a digital euro. We believe that it’s something that is going to be very important in Europe.

    There will be new legislation in the United States about stablecoins. They are going to become a means of payment and most projects are going to come from the United States. My reading of the digital euro project is digital public money: it will be a means of payment, it’s not going to pay an interest rate, and it will not replace cash. We are going to take financial stability implications into consideration too.

    People, at the end of the day, both in the analogue and digital context, always want to have public money. For them, that’s real money. And if people doubt whether they can transform their current account balance into banknotes, then a bank run can take place. The digital euro is going to play a similar role in a digital world.

    If the case for a digital euro is so clear, why does the legislator not see it? Brussels has been dragging its feet. Why is that, and do you expect a change?

    I hope that we will be able to convince the legislators, but you have to ask them why they have so many doubts. From our standpoint, it’s quite clear that a digital euro is something that is extremely relevant and useful in the payment context in Europe. And I think that eventually, they will be convinced of the clear advantages of a digital euro.

    MIL OSI Economics

  • MIL-OSI Economics: Christine Lagarde: Interview with Xinhua News Agency

    Source: European Central Bank

    Interview with Christine Lagarde, President of the ECB, conducted by Su Liang on 12 June 2025

    14 June 2025

    I was in the audience in 2018 at the opening ceremony of the first China International Import Expo in Shanghai. You said in a speech there that China built a bridge to the world, built a bridge to prosperity and is building a bridge to the future – the three bridges, which is famous in China. Has anything changed in your mind – is China building new bridges?

    I haven’t been back to China for six years – that was my last visit, six years ago. From what I have seen so far, I can tell you that this bridge to the future is clearly an enterprise that China is working hard on. The combination of robotic artificial intelligence, hard work by the Chinese people and the strategic approach to it are contributing a lot to that bridge to the future. Development will occur fast on a threefold basis: robotic artificial intelligence, hard work and all of that focused on the industries of the future, which are going to change the Chinese economy even faster and better.

    How does the ECB see China’s role in the global economic recovery, especially amid this increasing fragmentation in global supply chains? What kind of dialogue or cooperation would you like to see between the ECB and Chinese financial institutions?

    The main cooperation and dialogue that we have at the ECB with China is with the People’s Bank of China (PBOC), because we are both central banks for a large region. We share some of the same concerns, some of the same challenges and we have a strong and deep dialogue on those issues. We are both very attached to the regulatory framework and supervision that will sustain financial stability. Our primary responsibility at the ECB is price stability, and this is clearly defined in our strategy. We are within reach of the 2% medium-term inflation target that we have defined as price stability. But we cannot have price stability if we do not have financial stability. And that’s the reason why we – and I think the PBOC is on the same page – are very attached to a solid regulatory environment and strong supervision so that our financial sector is stable and solid, because it is in the interest of the people that we serve.

    This year marks the 50th anniversary of the establishment of diplomatic relations between China and the European Union, the then European Economic Community. As President of the ECB and previously a politician in Europe, how do you see the cooperation between China and the EU over the past 50 years?

    The cooperation between the European Union and China has been beneficial to both sides. We have increased the level of trade between our two regions, and we have seen increased direct investment over the course of the last few decades.

    And what will that cooperation look like in the future?

    I very much hope, in the interest of financial stability and price stability, that China and the European Union will continue to cooperate, will continue their dialogue, will be candid with each other and will play by the rules that they both agree to. I’m thinking of the WTO rules, for instance, as rules that both regions have agreed to support and have signed up to. I think that determination for dialogue, cooperation and working on win-win solutions is something that will continue to be shared.

    You talked about stability and about the rules. Do you think what the United States government is doing now is kind of a risk to stability and the rules? They are raising tariffs and creating uncertainty in the world economy.

    I would focus on your last point. The level of uncertainty caused by the announcements or the threats of decisions is dampening investment. It is leading all institutions to reduce their growth projections for the global economy, for the United States, for China and for Europe. It’s really a lose-lose situation that we have at the moment. The sooner the uncertainty can be removed and agreements can be found between the parties – on tariffs in particular, but on other issues as well, such as non-tariff barriers – the better off we will all be. Economic players, investors and employers have great difficulty dealing with uncertainty. The same applies to us as central banks because when we need to forecast, anticipate the evolution of the economy and project the level of prices, if we have this great uncertainty, it makes our lives really difficult.

    So when the delegations of China and the United States in London said they had made progress, that’s good news.

    I hope progress goes in the direction of removing as much uncertainty as possible. If it reaches a new equilibrium, which is beneficial for all countries, then it’s a positive.

    It is impossible to talk about China-EU relations without talking about China-US relations. You worked both in Washington and Europe. How do you see current China-US relations and how do you think China-US relations will impact China-EU relations?

    I don’t want to make any projections or anticipate what the outcome of the discussions will be between the Chinese authorities and the US authorities. This is for political leaders, for trade and commerce secretaries to discuss and to take forward. But what I observe is that all our countries – European Union Member States, China, the United States and many other countries – are intrinsically bound by supply chains. When you start dissecting a product and you realise what the origin of the product is, where the spare parts are coming from, what journey it takes to travel from one place to the other, it is amazing how countries are linked to each other. What will impact one will impact others, and if the situation is not resolved satisfactorily and the uncertainty is not removed, the corporate world will rethink their supply chains. They will rethink their supply and their sourcing, and that will cause more fragility and a period of uncertainty, during which growth will probably be impaired, during which we could have inflationary pressure as a result. And I think this is not in the interest of any country. As I said, it’s not just the United States, China and Europe, it’s many other countries as well.

    I remember you once said you stand by Adam Smith, you stand by liberalism. Do you think what we are witnessing in the world is a kind of failure of liberalism, the rules of free trade?

    We have to acknowledge what the benefits have been and where there have been downsides. The benefits have been incredible when you look at how much additional activity has prospered, how much growth has increased, how many people have been taken out of poverty, particularly in this country, in China, how the well-being of people has improved. There have been many benefits as a result of international open trade and free markets, but there have also been some negative consequences. There are areas in the world where industrial activity has died, where people have lost jobs and where measures have not been taken to deal with that. So we have to be mindful of that. We have to look at that very honestly and decide how we want to remedy those situations. It has a lot to do with reducing the disequilibrium, reducing the imbalances that we see both on an international but also on a domestic basis.

    Like you said, China has had a lot of benefits from globalisation, and China is now the second-largest economy in the world, and we have heard some concepts like de-risking from China in Europe. What is your opinion on this concept?

    The principle of de-risking is not surprising, and I think it has been accentuated by the COVID-19 period. You know, during the pandemic, countries and regions suddenly realised that they no longer had manufacturing facilities to produce some pharmaceutical goods (e.g. masks) that were needed, and they were dependent and vulnerable as a result. This desire not to be vulnerable, not to be exclusively dependent on one single source of supply, is completely legitimate to the extent that those products – not necessarily masks – are considered strategic. It’s completely normal that countries think they need to have alternative sources of supply. We need to have a degree of security of supply so that we are not at the mercy of a failure, or a unilateral decision that would expose the security of our people. So I don’t find anything surprising about it. It is legitimate, but it does not stop cooperation. It does not stop international trade.

    When it comes to financial innovation, people always focus on digital financing and green financing. The ECB is actively exploring a digital euro. How will this influence the future of finance from the perspective of European bankers? And on green innovation in financing, how can the ECB and the PBOC cooperate in the future?

    Firstly, both the PBOC and the ECB are working on a digital currency. China was ahead, it started earlier. We started six years ago, and we are getting to the point where, if the legislature supports the proposal, we should be ready to launch. Why are we doing that? Simply because of client demand, to put it very simply. Because many Europeans – not all, but many – like to pay electronically, digitally, without cash. Many Europeans still like cash. I like cash. So we will continue to have cash, and we will be issuing new banknotes in a few years’ time. But we need, as a sovereign expression on the financial stage, to be able to respond to the demand of our customers, Europeans. If they want cash, we should be able to print secure banknotes. If they want digital cash, we should be able to offer a digital euro. We want to make sure that we have a European offer that is available, so that within the entire euro area there is a means of payment and a solid currency that can help you transact both online, peer-to-peer, business-to-business, and that’s the purpose of the digital euro.

    And what about green financing?

    Green financing is an activity that is conducted by commercial banks or international institutions. The European Investment Bank, which is a public institution, also has a role. And as you know, Europe has approved a green bond framework that is available, which I think China has observed very carefully in order to issue its own framework. But it’s a matter for commercial banks.

    My final question is the following: you were the second most powerful woman in the world according to Forbes in 2019, 2020, 2022, 2023 and 2024. You have a life experience envied by women around the world. Do you have any advice for them on how to be successful?

    Women have inside them the potential to thrive in whichever domain they choose. And I think that they should always draw on that confidence and energy without which things do not happen, and they should cultivate that and never be intimidated or refrain from achieving what they can. They have to believe in themselves. I hope they get the support that I was lucky to receive from family members and friends, as that is extremely helpful to continue doing what you want to do.

    MIL OSI Economics

  • MIL-OSI Economics: Privacy blind spot could stall AI’s future in UK homes, says new study

    Source: Samsung

     
    As smart technology and AI become increasingly integrated into our daily lives, new research finds that nearly 9 out of 10 Brits (89%) express concerns about their privacy.
     
    But, for the majority of consumers, these concerns stop at their phones – despite other smart devices in the home also collecting personal data and being just as vulnerable to threats.
     
    This new research from Samsung Electronics, which surveyed over 8,000 Millennial and Gen Z respondents across Europe, including the UK, reveals that over a quarter (28%) of young Brits never think about the security of their smart appliances. In contrast, 1 in 2 (53%) think about the privacy of their mobile phones every day – a worrying blind spot given how connected our smart devices have become, and with the number of smart homes in Europe expected to surpass 100 million by 2028.[1]
     
    The research highlights how managing privacy can feel overwhelming for many – with over 1 in 10 (14%) of those surveyed saying it’s too complex, and 7 in 10 (70%) finding it stressful. Within Europe, Spain tops the list of countries where people find managing their privacy the most stressful (88%), followed by Greece (87%) and France (75%) and Italy (75%).
     
    Privacy concerns among Brits are wide-ranging – from fears of financial theft (73%) to unease about metadata being used to identify them (61%).
     
    The findings point to a deep education gap when it comes to privacy. Many want to take control of their data when it comes to their technology. In fact, almost 8 in 10 (78%) put such considerations front and centre at point of purchase, alongside their familiarity with the brand. Yet despite rising awareness, many still feel unequipped to take meaningful action:
     

    Only 22% say they feel ‘very’ knowledgeable about privacy
    Just over half (54%) are aware of the data their apps and devices collect about them
    3 in 10 (28%) accept default settings on apps without fully understanding them
    Almost 6 in 10 (57%) feel they can never be fully in control of their privacy across their devices
    7 in 10 (70%) are calling for better education on data and privacy
    Over 1 in 10 (14%) consumers say they trust brands to take the protection of their data seriously

     
    These fears are holding UK consumers back from harnessing the full potential of the latest technology. 1 in 5 (18%) haven’t shared data between smart devices in the past year due to security fears—showing that Brits aren’t taking full advantage of connected living, and the enhanced lifestyle benefits it can bring.
     
    Yet two thirds say they would be more open to fully embracing AI and smart-home technology if they better understood the benefits to their lifestyle (67%) and felt confident their data was secure (67%). From real-time smart home updates (15%) to personalised shopping discounts (15%), job opportunities (14%) and tailored fitness and health suggestions (14%), many recognise that they are missing out on everyday enhancements due to concerns around how their data is handled.
     
    In light of these findings, Samsung is reinforcing its commitment to empowering users with strong safeguards and transparent privacy controls in an increasingly AI-driven world.
     
    Dr. Seungwon Shin, Corporate EVP & Head of Security Team, Device eXperience Business at Samsung Electronics said: “At Samsung, we believe true innovation starts with people – which is why we put privacy at the core of everything we do. This research highlights a growing trend: while consumers are proactive about managing privacy on their smartphones, they’re often overlooking the broader ecosystem of connected devices. It also reflects a hesitation to fully embrace AI-powered experiences, largely driven by uncertainty around data use.
     
    As advocates for privacy-first design, we’re committed to earning trust through transparency, choice, and built-in protections. Everyone should be able to explore new AI capabilities with confidence, knowing their data is protected and they remain in control. That’s why we’re focused on putting privacy in the hands of users – where it belongs.”
     
    At the heart of this mission is Samsung Knox, the company’s government-grade security platform that safeguards its smart home appliances[2] and Galaxy devices. With the rise of connected living, Samsung is expanding Knox security across its ecosystem so users can enjoy smart appliances and AI-powered features with peace of mind[3]

    Knox Matrix is Samsung’s long-term vision for connected security—where devices in the same ecosystem work together to safeguard one another. Built on private blockchain technology and backed by future-ready protections like post-quantum cryptography[4], Knox Matrix enables real-time, multi-device protection across smartphones, tablets, TVs, and more.
     
    Complementing this is Knox Vault, which stores sensitive information like PINs, passwords and biometric data in a separate, hardware-based environment. This ensures that even if the main operating system is compromised, private information always stays protected.
     
    With this layered security in place, users are empowered to manage their privacy across all their connected devices, making choices entirely on their own terms.
     
    The research also shows that UK consumers want more than just promises—they’re seeking practical tools. 28% support clearer data usage policies, and almost the same amount value privacy information that’s simple and easy to understand (29%).
     
    Recognising this need, Samsung is expanding its efforts to educate users and equip them with tools that put privacy into their hands across all Samsung devices. For more information on privacy, see here. For more information on the Samsung Knox security principles, see here.
     
    [1]Research and Markets. (2024). Smart Homes and Home Automation Report 2024. Business Wire.
    [2]Samsung Knox is applied to select appliances launched in 2018 and later.
    [3]Samsung Knox Matrix cannot guarantee complete protection against all vulnerabilities within a user’s connected device ecosystem.
    [4]Post-quantum cryptography is available on Galaxy S25 series.

    MIL OSI Economics

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Study – The European Parliament’s oversight powers: Tools to scrutinise the European Commission – 16-06-2025

    Source: European Parliament

    The European Parliament is vested with powers of democratic oversight and political scrutiny vis-à-vis the European Commission. These powers of Parliament enhance the democratic legitimacy of the EU as a whole, and help increase the transparency and accountability of the Commission as the EU’s executive body. This study examines Parliament’s oversight and scrutiny powers over the Commission. It focuses mainly, but not exclusively, on the powers that are enshrined in specific provisions of the EU Treaties. This includes Parliament’s role in the Commission’s investiture, in motions of censure, parliamentary questions, committees of inquiry and special committees, and in the Commission’s obligations to report, consult and inform. It also looks into Parliament’s scrutiny over budgetary issues, of delegated acts, in the context of the EU legislative procedure and agenda-setting, of legal proceedings before the Court of Justice of the European Union, and of the EU’s external relations. The study builds on a previous EPRS study on parliamentary scrutiny of the Commission, originally requested by the European Parliament’s Committee on Constitutional Affairs (AFCO) in 2018. The data presented in this edition focus on the ninth term parliamentary term (2019 to 2024).

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Highland Council By-elections for Wards 6 & 10 – Voters urged to make sure their vote counts

    Source: Scotland – Highland Council

    Issued on behalf of the Returning Officer

    Polling will take place on Thursday 19 June 2025 to elect one of nine candidates standing in The Highland Council’s Cromarty Firth Ward by-election and one of eight candidates for Ward 10 Eilean a’ Cheò. Voters are being reminded to make sure they are ready to cast their vote.

    The single transferable vote system will be used. Instead of using a cross, voters should number the candidates in the order of their choice, putting a number 1 in the box next to the name of the candidate who is their first choice, 2 in the box next to their second choice and so on. Voters can make as many or as few choices as they wish.

    The Council has created a short video that explains the process – 

    Postal packs have been despatched to those registered electors that submitted a form by the postal vote deadline. Anyone who has requested a postal vote will not be able to vote in person at a polling station. If you are unable to post it in time, it is possible to hand in your completed postal pack into any of the polling stations located within wards 6 and 10 between 7am and 10pm on Thursday 19 June 2025. There are no restrictions on the number of postal votes that can be handed in to a polling station.

    A list of polling station locations can be found on the Council’s website

    For those opting to vote in person on Thursday 19 June 2025, polling stations will be open from 7am until 10pm. Voters are reminded to check their poll cards as this will have details of where they need to go to cast their vote. There is no requirement to bring any form of voter ID or poll cards.

    The candidates standing for election to Ward 6 – Cromarty Firth are:
     

    • CHISHOLM, Steve – Alba Party for independence
    • COSTIGANE, Ross – Scottish Liberal Democrats
    • CROSS, Richard James – Independent
    • FORBES, Ryan – Scottish Conservative and Unionist
    • MACDONALD, Allan – Reform UK
    • MACDONALD, Odette – Scottish National Party (SNP)
    • PERERA, Michael Robert – Scottish Labour Party
    • RATTRAY, Martin – Independent
    • THOMAS, Anne – Scottish Greens

    The candidates standing for Ward 10 Eilean a’ Cheò are:

    • COUPLAND, John – Reform UK
    • DICKSON, Campbell – Independent
    • GILLIES, Christine – Independent
    • LAWRENCE, Katy – Scottish Greens
    • MAC A’ BHÀILLIDH, Màrtainn – Scottish National Party (SNP)
    • MACDONALD, Jonathan – Independent
    • MACPHERSON, George – Scottish Conservative and Unionist
    • THOMSON, Fay – Scottish Liberal Democrats

    The electronic election counts for both wards will take place on Friday 20 June 2025 at Kyleakin Village Hall starting at 11am. People will be able to follow the count and watch the declaration of the results live on our YouTube channel and follow the latest via the Council’s social media channels – @highlandcouncil

    To support equal access for everyone and to assist with voting, a range of accessibility aids is provided, which also includes a new overlay. The overlay combined with the audio recording of the ballot paper, is intended to provide a complete self-service solution to the blind and partially sighted voters to vote independently and in secret.  

    All information about the by-election, including answers to frequently asked questions and short video clips to show how to vote is available by visiting the Council’s website   www.highland.gov.uk/byelection

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI: MEXC Unveils “Proof of Trust” Campaign for Crypto Security, Audits, and User Protection

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    VICTORIA, Seychelles, June 16, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — MEXC, a leading global cryptocurrency exchange, will launch Proof of Trust, a comprehensive global campaign aimed at strengthening user protection, operational transparency, and community trust across the crypto sector. This initiative combines concrete financial safeguards with security partnerships, open education, and user-first design — positioning MEXC as one of the most proactive players in an increasingly risk-conscious market.

    As part of the initiative, MEXC is implementing advanced security protocols and forming strategic partnerships with leading blockchain auditing firms. In March 2025, the exchange partnered with Hacken, a well-known blockchain security auditor, to support external risk monitoring and system-wide security assessments. According to MEXC COO Tracy Jin, “External, independent verification is essential for maintaining trust and accountability. We thank Hacken for their work and remain committed to prioritizing security and transparency as we scale globally.”

    Central to the Proof of Trust campaign is MEXC’s groundbreaking $100 million Guardian Fund, which represents one of the industry’s most transparent and accessible user protection mechanisms. This fund provides comprehensive coverage for users facing severe security threats, including large-scale exploits, targeted attacks, and unforeseen system vulnerabilities. What sets this fund apart is its complete transparency—all wallet addresses are publicly disclosed on MEXC’s website, allowing users to verify balances and monitor transactions through blockchain records. Unlike traditional third-party insurance with lengthy claims processes, the Guardian Fund offers agile and rapid deployment, ensuring users receive timely support. This initiative establishes a new industry benchmark for proactive risk management and demonstrates MEXC’s commitment to putting user safety first.

    The campaign also includes a renewed focus on user empowerment through education. MEXC Learn, the platform’s multilingual educational hub (available in over eight languages), provides free access to beginner guides, safety tools, and advanced trading insights — helping both newcomers and seasoned traders navigate the ecosystem responsibly.

    To reinforce financial integrity, MEXC now publishes enhanced Proof-of-Reserves and Security Reports on a bi-monthly basis, allowing users to verify that all major assets are fully backed independently. Current data confirms reserve ratios exceeding 100% across core cryptocurrencies — underlining the exchange’s liquidity strength and long-term solvency.

    Importantly, MEXC remains one of the financially strongest and most secure centralized exchanges. In addition to routine Proof-of-Reserves disclosures, the exchange maintains insurance and emergency funds to protect user assets in the event of force majeure events such as cyberattacks, system breaches, or other unforeseen security incidents. In 2025, MEXC plans to increase its security and protection budgets as part of its broader commitment to making digital asset trading safer for global users.

    The Proof of Trust campaign by MEXC is also focused on community and engagement. The platform design is elaborated in detail to reflect user-centricity, simplicity, and innovation. Besides, UX (user experience) metrics are being continuously researched and revised accordingly. Feedback from users is a cornerstone for providing an engaging and fulfilling environment. Stories and interactive campaigns featured by MEXC add up to both positive networking and valuable experience sharing. MEXC is dedicated to maintaining the highest standards of security and user satisfaction, industry experts say.

    The launch of the Proof of Trust multifaceted campaign, combining unprecedented security and transparency measures with community engagement and education, is a substantial input of MEXC into the crypto industry globally. By employing such large-scale initiatives, MEXC is maintaining its leadership and trendsetter position in the market.

    About MEXC
    Founded in 2018, MEXC is committed to being “Your Easiest Way to Crypto.” Serving over 40 million users across 170+ countries, MEXC is known for its broad selection of trending tokens, everyday airdrop opportunities, and low trading fees. Our user-friendly platform is designed to support both new traders and experienced investors, offering secure and efficient access to digital assets. MEXC prioritizes simplicity and innovation, making crypto trading more accessible and rewarding.
    MEXC Official WebsiteXTelegramHow to Sign Up on MEXC

    Source

    Contact:
    Lucia Hu
    lucia.hu@mexc.com

    Disclaimer: This is a paid post and is provided by MEXC. The statements, views, and opinions expressed in this content are solely those of the content provider and do not necessarily reflect the views of this media platform or its publisher. We do not endorse, verify, or guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of any information presented. We do not guarantee any claims, statements, or promises made in this article. This content is for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial, investment, or trading advice.Investing in crypto and mining-related opportunities involves significant risks, including the potential loss of capital. It is possible to lose all your capital. These products may not be suitable for everyone, and you should ensure that you understand the risks involved. Seek independent advice if necessary. Speculate only with funds that you can afford to lose. Readers are strongly encouraged to conduct their own research and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. However, due to the inherently speculative nature of the blockchain sector—including cryptocurrency, NFTs, and mining—complete accuracy cannot always be guaranteed.Neither the media platform nor the publisher shall be held responsible for any fraudulent activities, misrepresentations, or financial losses arising from the content of this press release. In the event of any legal claims or charges against this article, we accept no liability or responsibility. Globenewswire does not endorse any content on this page.

    Legal Disclaimer: This media platform provides the content of this article on an “as-is” basis, without any warranties or representations of any kind, express or implied. We assume no responsibility for any inaccuracies, errors, or omissions. We do not assume any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information presented herein. Any concerns, complaints, or copyright issues related to this article should be directed to the content provider mentioned above.

    A photo accompanying this announcement is available at https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/bc82c1b5-76bc-4295-bb7f-744a43d60686

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: EU hypocrisy fuelling suffering in Gaza

    Source: Médecins Sans Frontières –

    Brussels – The hypocrisy and inaction of the European Union and its Member States have allowed Israel to freely continue its massacre of Palestinians in Gaza with total impunity, said Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) in a press conference in Brussels today. MSF calls for impartial needs-based aid to be facilitated into the Gaza Strip at scale, the protection of civilians, and the immediate restoration of a sustained ceasefire; European governments must act decisively to expedite this.

    For more than 20 months, Israeli authorities and forces have inflicted a punishing campaign, including large-scale forced displacement, ethnic cleansing against Palestinians in Gaza. On a daily basis, our teams witness patterns consistent with genocide through deliberate actions by Israeli forces – including mass killings, the destruction of vital civilian infrastructure, and blockades choking off access to food, water, medicines, and other essential humanitarian supplies. Israel is systematically destroying the conditions necessary for Palestinian life. Gaza’s homes, hospitals, markets, water networks, roads, and power grids have been demolished, not by disregard but by design.

    Children hold their empty pots at a community kitchen in northern Gaza, Palestine, February 2025.
    Nour Alsaqqa/MSF

    The European Union (EU) and European governments have the political, economic, and diplomatic means to exert real pressure on Israel to stop this assault and open Gaza’s border crossings to unhindered humanitarian aid. These are not theoretical instruments. They can be effectively mobilised in defence of international law and to protect civilians.

    However, up to this point, the EU and its member states appear to have abdicated their political leadership to do so. Worse, recent statements European States have made, critical of how the war is being waged, highlights their hypocrisy as they continue to supply the weapons being used to kill, maim, and burn people who end up in our hospitals.

    “The war in Gaza is one of the most egregious, deadly and ruthless wars waged on a people of our time,” says Christopher Lockyear, MSF Secretary General. “It is an orchestrated massacre of Palestinian people. It is purposeful ethnic cleansing.” 

    “Stopping this requires political courage, legal responsibility, and moral commitment,” says Lockyear. “The scale of suffering in Gaza demands more than empty rhetoric.”

    Aid has been weaponised, used as leverage, conditioned, or blocked entirely. Since the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation launched its activities on 27 May, as part of the US-Israeli scheme to instrumentalise aid, hundreds of Palestinians have been treated in hospitals, and scores have been killed, after being shot at these aid distribution sites while waiting to receive the basic necessities for survival.

    “The imposed system of aid delivery is not only a failure, but it is dehumanising and dangerous,” says Lockyear. “It exposes thousands of Palestinians to unnecessary risks, leading to bloodshed that can be avoided if humanitarian organisations are allowed to provide aid impartially and safely, at the necessary scale that is so desperately need in Gaza.”

    Today, Nasser hospital, southern Gaza’s main referral hospital for thousands of patients in the area, is barely able to continue working, due to repeated evacuation orders and movement restrictions on staff and patients. In recent weeks, MSF teams admitted over 500 patients requiring medical care to the hospital, while supporting the hospital’s medical staff to respond to repeated mass casualty influxes from constant bombings and attacks. 

    “Humanitarian organisations have set up makeshift hospitals to fill the gap, but they can in no way replace regular hospitals,” says Lockyear. “The remaining hospitals must be protected, and the entry of aid facilitated. Failure to do so will cost yet more lives.”

    MSF, like many organisations, has repeatedly called for an immediate and unconditional ceasefire, unfettered humanitarian access, and respect for international humanitarian law – including the protection of medical staff and facilities.

    Several governments continue to express concerns about the horrific situation in Gaza, but their statements that invoke concern with adherence to IHL are shrouded in hypocrisy as they continue to send the arms that kill and maim the children we treat.

    “What people are experiencing in Gaza is beyond unbearable: it must stop now,” says Lockyear. “As this military onslaught against a besieged people rages on, the hypocrisy of EU states who speak but don’t act, is more obvious by the day.” 

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI Africa: Social Engineering 2.0: When artificial intelligence becomes the ultimate manipulator

    Once the domain of elite spies and con artists, social engineering is now in the hands of anyone with an internet connection – and AI is the accomplice. Supercharged by generative tools and deepfake technology, today’s social engineering attacks are no longer sloppy phishing attempts. They’re targeted, psychologically precise, and frighteningly scalable.

    Welcome to Social Engineering 2.0, where the manipulators don’t need to know you personally. Their AI already does.

    Deception at machine levels

    Social engineering works because it bypasses firewalls and technical defences. It attacks human trust. From fake bank alerts to long-lost Nigerian princes, these scams have traditionally relied on generic hooks and low-effort deceit. But that’s changed, and continues to.

    “AI is augmenting and automating the way social engineering is carried out,” says Anna Collard, SVP of Content Strategy & Evangelist at KnowBe4 Africa. “Traditional phishing markers like spelling errors or bad grammar are a thing of the past. AI can mimic writing styles, generate emotionally resonant messages, and even recreate voices or faces (https://apo-opa.co/409nwPV) – all within minutes.”

    The result? Cybercriminals now wield the capabilities of psychological profilers. By scraping publicly available data – from social media to company bios – AI can construct detailed personal dossiers. “Instead of one-size-fits-all lures, AI enables criminals to create bespoke attacks,” Collard explains. “It’s like giving every scammer access to their own digital intelligence agency.”

    The new face of manipulation: Deepfakes

    One of the most chilling evolutions of AI-powered deception is the rise of deepfakes – synthetic video and audio designed to impersonate real people. “There are documented cases where AI-generated voices have been used to impersonate CEOs and trick staff into wiring millions (https://apo-opa.co/4e4JBVv),” notes Collard.

    In South Africa, a recent deepfake video circulating on WhatsApp featured a convincingly faked endorsement by FSCA Commissioner Unathi Kamlana promoting a fraudulent trading platform. Nedbank had to publicly distance itself from the scam (https://apo-opa.co/4e4JCJ3).

    “We’ve seen deepfakes used in romance scams, political manipulation, even extortion,” says Collard. One emerging tactic involves simulating a child’s voice to convince a parent they’ve been kidnapped (https://apo-opa.co/3HY5WrR) – complete with background noise, sobs, and a fake abductor demanding money.

    “It’s not just deception anymore,” Collard warns. “It’s psychological manipulation at scale.”

    The Scattered Spider effect

    One cybercrime group exemplifying this threat is Scattered Spider. Known for its fluency in English and deep understanding of Western corporate culture, this group specialises in highly convincing social engineering campaigns. “What makes them so effective,” notes Collard, “is their ability to sound legitimate, form quick rapport, and exploit internal processes – often tricking IT staff or help-desk agents.” Their human-centric approach, amplified by AI tools, such as using audio deepfakes to spoof victims’ voices for obtaining initial access, shows how the combination of cultural familiarity, psychological insight, and automation is redefining what cyber threats look like. It’s not just about technical access – it’s about trust, timing, and manipulation.

    Social engineering at scale

    What once required skilled con artists days or weeks of interaction – establishing trust, crafting believable pretexts, and subtly nudging behaviour – can now be done by AI in the blink of an eye. “AI has industrialised the tactics of social engineering,” says Collard. “It can perform psychological profiling, identify emotional triggers, and deliver personalised manipulation with unprecedented speed.”

    The classic stages – reconnaissance, pretexting, rapport-building – are now automated, scalable, and tireless. Unlike human attackers, AI doesn’t get sloppy or fatigued; it learns, adapts, and improves with every interaction.

    The biggest shift? “No one has to be a high-value target anymore,” Collard explains. “A receptionist, an HR intern, or a help-desk agent; all may hold the keys to the kingdom. It’s not about who you are – it’s about what access you have.”   

    Building cognitive resilience

    In this new terrain, technical solutions alone won’t cut it. “Awareness has to go beyond ‘don’t click the link,’” says Collard. She advocates for building ‘digital mindfulness’ and ‘cognitive resilience’ – the ability to pause, interrogate context, and resist emotional triggers (https://apo-opa.co/3FF6Zwn).

    This means:

    • Training staff to recognise emotional manipulation, not just suspicious URLs.
    • Running simulations using AI-generated lures, not outdated phishing templates.
    • Rehearsing calm, deliberate decision-making under pressure, to counter panic-based manipulation.

    Collard recommends unconventional tactics, too. “Ask HR interviewees to place their hand in front of their face during video calls – it can help spot deepfakes in hiring scams,” she says. Families and teams should also consider pre-agreed code words or secrets for emergency communications, in case AI-generated voices impersonate loved ones.

    Defence in depth – human and machine

    While attackers now have AI tools, so too do defenders. Behavioural analytics, real-time content scanning, and anomaly detection systems are evolving rapidly. But Collard warns: “Technology will never replace critical thinking. The organisations that win will be the ones combining human insight with machine precision.”

    And with AI lures growing more persuasive, the question is no longer whether you’ll be targeted – but whether you’ll be prepared. “This is a race,” Collard concludes. “But I remain hopeful. If we invest in education, in critical thinking and digital mindfulness, in the discipline of questioning what we see and hear – we’ll have a fighting chance.”

    Distributed by APO Group on behalf of KnowBe4.

    MIL OSI Africa