Category: Politics

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Political pressure put on EMA over vaccine testing – E-001696/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-001696/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Gerald Hauser (PfE)

    The Commission is reported to have deliberately quashed important COVID-19 vaccine safety audits in 2020. The European Medicines Agency (EMA) waived mandatory inspections of test centres, saying it was because of the risk of infection and political pressure. EMA Director Emer Cooke decided to cancel missions to carry out inspections, in particular to AstraZeneca’s test sites in Brazil, for example. The decision, however, was not officially documented. Later it came out that the vaccines had many serious side effects, such as brain thrombosis. Reports of adverse reactions for the BioNTech/Pfizer vaccines were also ignored. Critics complain that the EMA relied to a large extent on manufacturer’s claims when granting authorisation. The agency has to date defended its actions.[1]

    • 1.Why was political pressure put on the EMA to suspend mandatory safety testing when approving vaccines?
    • 2.Who put political pressure on the EMA to suspend suspend mandatory safety testing when approving vaccines, and when?
    • 3.What consequences will ensue following these revelations?

    Submitted: 28.4.2025

    • [1] https://apollo-news.net/eu-kommission-unterdrckte-bewusst-sicherheitsprfungen-von-covid-impfstoffen/
    Last updated: 7 May 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Strengthening EU-UK defence cooperation and implications for national sovereignty – E-001725/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-001725/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Afroditi Latinopoulou (PfE)

    British defence companies have been allowed to participate in the EU’s security fund. In view of the fact that no measures have been announced to ensure that the strengthening of this cooperation does not undermine the sovereignty of EU Member States, can the Commission say:

    • 1.On the basis of what criteria has the United Kingdom, which is no longer an EU Member State, been included in strategic European defence schemes, and how does the Commission intend to eliminate any potential risk of critical know-how or security data leaking to non-EU powers?
    • 2.How will it ensure that the involvement of non-EU countries in Common Security and Defence Policy structures does not alter its character as a European, strictly intergovernmental operation?
    • 3.Is there a mechanism to suspend or limit the participation of non-EU countries (such as the UK) should conflicts of interest or breaches of ethical and legal frameworks be identified?

    Submitted: 30.4.2025

    Last updated: 7 May 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Protecting citizens and democracy against the threat of deepfake and AI-generated content – E-001742/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-001742/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Dan-Ştefan Motreanu (PPE)

    The Danish Government recently announced its intention to ban the distribution of deepfake videos and AI-generated content without the consent of the individuals depicted. The government argues that current legislation is insufficient to protect democracy, public discourse and personal identity from the harmful effects of manipulated content. To address this, Denmark plans to amend its Copyright Act by introducing a new right for individuals over the use of their own body, voice, facial features and image. The proposal would allow for a ban on the distribution of deepfakes and AI-generated material portraying individuals without their consent.

    Given the serious threats that non-consensual deepfake content poses to personal rights, trust in public information and democratic stability across the EU, swift and coordinated action at European level is urgently needed.

    What concrete measures does the Commission intend to take to address the risks posed by deepfake and AI-generated content and to ensure the protection of citizens’ identity and dignity and democratic values across the Union?

    Submitted: 30.4.2025

    Last updated: 7 May 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Attack on Gaza Freedom Flotilla – E-001794/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-001794/2025
    to the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy
    Rule 144
    Lynn Boylan (The Left)

    In the early hours of 2 May 2025, the Conscience – a vessel that is part of the Gaza Freedom Flotilla – was attacked by a drone in international waters and sustained significant damage.

    The Gaza Freedom Flotilla is seeking to break the blockade of Gaza, which is now so severe that no humanitarian aid has entered since the ceasefire was broken by Israel in March 2025. EU citizens were present, on board the ship, when it was attacked.

    Thus far, Israeli officials have refused to comment on the attack.

    Will the VP/HR:

    • 1.Demand full transparency and accountability for this attack?
    • 2.Demand an immediate end to Israel’s blockade of Gaza?
    • 3.Ensure that there are diplomatic and political consequences for attacks on any humanitarian workers – including EU citizens?

    Submitted: 2.5.2025

    Last updated: 7 May 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the arrest and risk of execution of Tundu Lissu, Chair of Chadema, the main opposition party in Tanzania – RC-B10-0260/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    pursuant to Rules 150(5) and 136(4) of the Rules of Procedure
    replacing the following motions:
    B10‑0260/2025 (Verts/ALE)
    B10‑0261/2025 (S&D)
    B10‑0263/2025 (Renew)
    B10‑0264/2025 (PPE)
    B10‑0265/2025 (ECR)

    Sebastião Bugalho, Reinhold Lopatka, Michael Gahler, David McAllister, Željana Zovko, Michał Szczerba, Antonio López‑Istúriz White, Ana Miguel Pedro, Davor Ivo Stier, Tomas Tobé, Liudas Mažylis, Ingeborg Ter Laak, Isabel Wiseler‑Lima, Mirosława Nykiel, Wouter Beke, Luděk Niedermayer, Vangelis Meimarakis, Milan Zver, Tomáš Zdechovský, Danuše Nerudová, Miriam Lexmann, Jan Farský, Loránt Vincze, Jessica Polfjärd, Andrey Kovatchev, Inese Vaidere
    on behalf of the PPE Group
    Yannis Maniatis, Francisco Assis, Marit Maij
    on behalf of the S&D Group
    Adam Bielan, Jadwiga Wiśniewska, Sebastian Tynkkynen, Joachim Stanisław Brudziński, Assita Kanko, Waldemar Tomaszewski, Alberico Gambino
    on behalf of the ECR Group
    Jan‑Christoph Oetjen, Oihane Agirregoitia Martínez, Petras Auštrevičius, Malik Azmani, Dan Barna, Benoit Cassart, Olivier Chastel, Engin Eroglu, Svenja Hahn, Karin Karlsbro, Moritz Körner, Ilhan Kyuchyuk, Urmas Paet, Marie‑Agnes Strack‑Zimmermann, Hilde Vautmans, Michal Wiezik, Lucia Yar
    on behalf of the Renew Group
    Catarina Vieira
    on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

    Document selected :  

    RC-B10-0260/2025

    Texts tabled :

    RC-B10-0260/2025

    Texts adopted :

    European Parliament resolution on the arrest and risk of execution of Tundu Lissu, Chair of Chadema, the main opposition party in Tanzania

    (2025/2690(RSP))

    The European Parliament,

     having regard to Rules 150(5) and 136(4) of its Rules of Procedure,

    A. whereas Tundu Lissu, leader of Chadema, Tanzania’s main opposition party, was arrested on 9 April 2025 in Mbinga, following a peaceful rally advocating electoral reforms;

    B. whereas Lissu narrowly survived an assassination attempt in 2017 and was forced into exile, only to face renewed persecution upon his return to Tanzania;

    C. whereas on 10 April 2025, Lissu was charged with treason, along with three offences of publication of false information under cybercrime laws; whereas treason in Tanzania carries a potential death sentence; whereas the EU is unequivocally opposed to the death penalty under all circumstances;

    D. whereas shortly after Lissu’s arrest, Chadema was disqualified from the October 2025 presidential and parliamentary elections, based on the party’s refusal to sign an electoral code of conduct;

    E. whereas ahead of the November 2024 local elections, Tanzania’s Government impeded opposition meetings, arbitrarily arrested hundreds of opposition supporters, imposed restrictions on social media access and banned independent media; whereas thousands of opposition candidates were disqualified from participating; whereas at least four government critics were forcibly disappeared and one Chadema official was abducted and brutally killed;

    F. whereas Tanzania’s ranking in Freedom House’s freedom report was downgraded in 2025 to ‘not free’;

    1. Condemns the arrest of Lissu and expresses grave concern over the charges against him, which appear to be politically motivated and carry the risk of capital punishment; calls on the Tanzanian Government to immediately and unconditionally release him, ensuring his safety and his right to a fair trial and legal representation;

    2. Urges the Tanzanian authorities to end the escalating crackdown, arbitrary arrests, violence, attacks and harassment against opposition members, human rights defenders, indigenous peoples, LGBTIQ+ activists, journalists and civil society organisations, and to independently investigate police abuses and enforced disappearances, to uphold the rule of law, freedom of expression, press, media and association, and judicial independence, to bring Tanzania’s cybercrime and media laws in line with international human rights law, to respect the rights of political parties and to ensure free and fair elections;

    3. Calls on the Tanzanian authorities to reinstate Chadema’s full participation in the October 2025 elections and to engage with all political parties in transparent and inclusive dialogue on electoral reform, in consultation with civil society groups and other stakeholders;

    4. Calls for the EU and its Member States to critically engage with the Tanzanian authorities regarding Lissu’s case and to closely monitor the trial; urges them to consider appropriate measures if the human rights situation continues to deteriorate; urges Tanzania to abolish the death penalty and commute all death sentences;

    5. Reiterates the need for the EU to ensure that its development cooperation with Tanzania, including the Global Gateway initiative, is consistent with the promotion of human rights, freedom of expression and fair trial standards;

    6. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Government and Parliament of Tanzania, the African Union and the VP/HR.​

     

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the return of Ukrainian children forcibly transferred and deported by Russia – RC-B10-0249/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    pursuant to Rules 150(5) and 136(4) of the Rules of Procedure
    replacing the following motions:
    B10‑0249/2025 (Verts/ALE)
    B10‑0250/2025 (S&D)
    B10‑0252/2025 (Renew)
    B10‑0255/2025 (PPE)
    B10‑0258/2025 (ECR)

    Sebastião Bugalho, Jessika Van Leeuwen, Michael Gahler, David McAllister, Sandra Kalniete, Željana Zovko, Andrzej Halicki, Michał Szczerba, Antonio López‑Istúriz White, Ana Miguel Pedro, Dariusz Joński, Davor Ivo Stier, Tomas Tobé, Reinhold Lopatka, Liudas Mažylis, Ingeborg Ter Laak, Isabel Wiseler‑Lima, Mirosława Nykiel, Wouter Beke, Luděk Niedermayer, Vangelis Meimarakis, Milan Zver, Tomáš Zdechovský, Danuše Nerudová, Miriam Lexmann, Ondřej Kolář, Jan Farský, Loránt Vincze, Jessica Polfjärd, Andrey Kovatchev, Ewa Kopacz, Matej Tonin, Inese Vaidere
    on behalf of the PPE Group
    Yannis Maniatis, Francisco Assis, Thijs Reuten, Evin Incir, Pina Picierno
    on behalf of the S&D Group
    Adam Bielan, Rihards Kols, Jadwiga Wiśniewska, Aurelijus Veryga, Reinis Pozņaks, Alexandr Vondra, Maciej Wąsik, Veronika Vrecionová, Ondřej Krutílek, Joachim Stanisław Brudziński, Michał Dworczyk, Assita Kanko, Jaak Madison, Mariusz Kamiński, Roberts Zīle, Charlie Weimers, Beatrice Timgren, Dick Erixon, Sebastian Tynkkynen
    on behalf of the ECR Group
    Petras Auštrevičius, Oihane Agirregoitia Martínez, Abir Al‑Sahlani, Malik Azmani, Dan Barna, Helmut Brandstätter, Benoit Cassart, Olivier Chastel, Veronika Cifrová Ostrihoňová, Engin Eroglu, Svenja Hahn, Karin Karlsbro, Ľubica Karvašová, Michał Kobosko, Moritz Körner, Ilhan Kyuchyuk, Nathalie Loiseau, Jan‑Christoph Oetjen, Urmas Paet, Marie‑Agnes Strack‑Zimmermann, Eugen Tomac, Hilde Vautmans, Lucia Yar, Dainius Žalimas
    on behalf of the Renew Group
    Villy Søvndal
    on behalf of The Left Group
    Hanna Gedin, Jonas Sjöstedt, Merja Kyllönen

    Document selected :  

    RC-B10-0249/2025

    Texts tabled :

    RC-B10-0249/2025

    Texts adopted :

    European Parliament resolution on the return of Ukrainian children forcibly transferred and deported by Russia

    (2025/2691(RSP))

    The European Parliament,

     having regard to its previous resolutions on Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine,

     having regard to the UN Charter, the European Convention on Human Rights, the Geneva Conventions and their additional protocols, the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC), the UN Convention on the rights of the child, and the Genocide Convention (CPPCG),

     having regard to Rules 150(5) and 136(4) of its Rules of Procedure,

    A. whereas since February 2022 around 20 000 Ukrainian children have been forcibly deported to the Russian Federation and Belarus or detained in temporarily occupied Ukrainian territories, with only 1 293 returned and 624 confirmed dead, according to President Zelenskyy’s ‘Bring Kids Back UA’ initiative; whereas according to the Yale Humanitarian Research Lab (HRL) the real figures are probably much higher, as these transfers and deportations continue;

    B. whereas international law prohibits forcible transfer to an occupied territory or deportation from an occupied territory to the territory of the occupier, which is a war crime under the Rome Statute and may amount to genocide under the CPPCG;

    C. whereas on 17 March 2023 the ICC issued arrest warrants for Vladimir Putin and Maria Lvova-Belova for their responsibility for the war crime of unlawful transfer and deportation of Ukrainian children;

    1. Strongly condemns the violent actions of the Russian Federation and the complicity of Belarus in the mistreatment of Ukrainian children, including murder, forced transfer and deportation, illegal adoption, sexual abuse and exploitation, forced Russification and militarisation; stresses that these acts form part of a genocidal strategy to erase Ukrainian identity;

    2. Urges the EU to hold those responsible to account and to sanction individuals and entities implicated in these crimes;

    3. Demands that these crimes cease immediately and that Russia reports the identities and whereabouts of all deported Ukrainian children and ensures their well-being and safe and unconditional return;

    4. Urges Russian federal and local authorities to grant international organisations, such as the ICRC, OHCHR and UNICEF, access to all deported Ukrainian children;

    5. Denounces the forced imposition of Russian citizenship on deported children and their state-sponsored adoption by Russian families as part of a deliberate policy of forced assimilation;

    6. Calls for the EU to closely cooperate with and support Ukrainian authorities, international and non-governmental organisations in their efforts to document all missing and deported Ukrainian children; urges the international community, including the United States, to maintain HRL’s funding and the EU to ensure its continuation;

    7. Emphasises that any genuine peace deal must include the repatriation of these children and accountability for forcible transfers and deportations;

    8. Urges the international community to hold Russia accountable by reinforcing coordination through the ICC, the ICJ, and the Special tribunal for the crime of aggression against Ukraine;

    9. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the VP/HR, the Council, the Commission, the governments and parliaments of the Member States, the Council of Europe, the OSCE, the President, Government and parliament of Ukraine, and to the United States, Russia and Belarus.

     

     

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on violations of religious freedom in Tibet – RC-B10-0248/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    pursuant to Rules 150(5) and 136(4) of the Rules of Procedure
    replacing the following motions:
    B10‑0248/2025 (Verts/ALE)
    B10‑0251/2025 (S&D)
    B10‑0254/2025 (Renew)
    B10‑0256/2025 (PPE)
    B10‑0259/2025 (ECR)

    Sebastião Bugalho, Danuše Nerudová, Michael Gahler, Antonio López‑Istúriz White, Ana Miguel Pedro, Davor Ivo Stier, Tomas Tobé, Reinhold Lopatka, Liudas Mažylis, Ingeborg Ter Laak, Isabel Wiseler‑Lima, Mirosława Nykiel, Wouter Beke, Luděk Niedermayer, Vangelis Meimarakis, Milan Zver, Tomáš Zdechovský, Miriam Lexmann, Ondřej Kolář, Jan Farský, Loránt Vincze, Jessica Polfjärd, Andrey Kovatchev, Inese Vaidere
    on behalf of the PPE Group
    Yannis Maniatis, Francisco Assis, Hannes Heide
    on behalf of the S&D Group
    Adam Bielan, Joachim Stanisław Brudziński, Assita Kanko, Maciej Wąsik, Veronika Vrecionová, Ondřej Krutílek, Alexandr Vondra, Mariusz Kamiński, Małgorzata Gosiewska, Michał Dworczyk, Sebastian Tynkkynen, Waldemar Tomaszewski, Carlo Fidanza
    on behalf of the ECR Group
    Engin Eroglu, Oihane Agirregoitia Martínez, Petras Auštrevičius, Dan Barna, Helmut Brandstätter, Benoit Cassart, Olivier Chastel, Svenja Hahn, Karin Karlsbro, Moritz Körner, Ilhan Kyuchyuk, Ľubica Karvašová, Jan‑Christoph Oetjen, Marie‑Agnes Strack‑Zimmermann, Hilde Vautmans, Lucia Yar, Dainius Žalimas
    on behalf of the Renew Group
    Ville Niinistö
    on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

    European Parliament resolution on violations of religious freedom in Tibet

    (2025/2692(RSP))

    The European Parliament,

     having regard to its previous resolutions on Tibet and China,

     having regard to Rules 150(5) and 136(4) of its Rules of Procedure,

    A. whereas, under the leadership of Xi Jinping, the Chinese authorities have become increasingly oppressive; whereas the human rights situation in Tibet continues to deteriorate; whereas respect for human rights, democracy and the rule of law should be at the centre of the EU’s relations with China;

    B. whereas Tulku Hungkar Dorje, a respected Tibetan Buddhist religious leader and humanitarian figure, died on 28 March 2025 under suspicious circumstances while in custody in Vietnam, following his arrest by Vietnamese and Chinese authorities; whereas his body was reportedly cremated without the consent of his family, raising serious concerns;

    C. whereas Tibetan Buddhists, who are systemically targeted by Chinese authorities and face forced disappearances and physical abuse, represent the largest religious group among political prisoners in China;

    D. whereas credible reports identify extensive pressure from Chinese authorities on Rinpoches to align with the Chinese Communist Party’s narrative, including forced interrogations and attempts to enforce support for the Chinese-appointed Panchen Lama;

    1. Strongly condemns the repressive assimilation policies throughout PRC and their violations of universal human rights, especially in Tibet, which seek to eliminate distinct Tibetan religious and cultural traditions and heritage; calls for a clear separation between State and religion in China;

    2. Firmly opposes any attempt by the Chinese Government to interfere in the selection of Tibetan Buddhist spiritual leaders, including the Dalai Lama;

    3. Expresses its deep concern and sorrow over the suspicious death of Tulku Hungkar Dorje and extends its sincere condolences to his family, monastery and followers;

    4. Strongly condemns the continued persecution of Tibetan religious and cultural leaders and the practice of transnational repression by Chinese authorities, including the cultural and linguistic assimilation of children in state-run residential schools, reflecting a broader policy of forced assimilation; calls for the suspension of extradition treaties with the PRC;

    5. Calls for an immediate, independent, impartial and transparent investigation into his death, with international oversight and access to evidence and witnesses, and the immediate return of his remains;

    6. Demands that those responsible for wrongdoing be held accountable under international human rights standards and law; demands that the EU impose sanctions on officials and entities responsible for human rights violations in Tibet;

    7. Urges the PRC to uphold its obligations under international law and cease all discrimination against religious and ethnic minorities, allow peaceful religious practice, and release all religious and political prisoners, including the rightful Panchen Lama and Ilham Tohti;

    8. Urges the EU and Member States to raise this case in bilateral and multilateral dialogues with PRC and Vietnam, and demand accountability for human rights violations in Tibet; insists on also raising the repression of other religious minorities such as the Uyghurs in Xinjiang;

    9. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the EUSR, the governments of PRC and Vietnam, the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights and the Central Tibetan Administration.

     

     

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – EU Cohesion Policy – P-001314/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    1. As underlined in the recent Commission’s communication on ‘The road to the next multiannual financial framework’[1] (MFF), it is imperative that the next EU budget plays a central role in promoting the EU’s sustainable prosperity and bolstering economic, social and territorial cohesion.

    2. In line with the political guidelines of the President of the Commission[2] and the above-mentioned communication, the future EU budget will include a strengthened cohesion and growth policy with regions at the centre. At the core of the modernised EU budget should be a plan for each country with key reforms and investments, and focusing on joint priorities, including promoting economic, social and territorial cohesion, which will be designed and implemented in partnership with national, regional and local authorities. Delivering on EU priorities must be done together — with Member States and their regions shaping many of the EU investments on the ground, and the EU budget supporting and incentivising their action. Cohesion policy will continue to support all regions, with particular attention to the less developed ones.

    3. The Commission is currently engaging with the EU institutions, including the European Parliament, Member States and stakeholders to help prepare the proposal for the next MFF, which it intends to present in July 2025.

    • [1]  https://commission.europa.eu/document/download/6d47acb4-9206-4d0f-8f9b-3b10cad7b1ed_en?filename=Communication%20on%20the%20road%20to%20the%20next%20MFF_en.pdf
    • [2]  https://commission.europa.eu/document/download/e6cd4328-673c-4e7a-8683-f63ffb2cf648_en
    Last updated: 7 May 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Definition of antisemitism – E-000044/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Commission has made combating antisemitism and hate a political priority. There is no place for antisemitism or any form of hatred and violence in the EU[1].

    The Commission recommends the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) definition as a practical guidance and useful tool, in particular for education and training purposes for teachers, Non-Governmental Organisations, state authorities and the media in line with the 2024 Council declaration on fostering Jewish life and combating antisemitism[2], the 2022 Council Conclusions on combating racism and antisemitism[3] and the 2018 EU Council declaration on combating antisemitism[4].

    As also stated in the first progress report of the EU Strategy on combating antisemitism and fostering Jewish life[5], to date, 25 Member States have adopted or endorsed the IHRA working definition of antisemitism[6].

    The IHRA definition states that criticism of Israel similar to that levelled against any other country cannot be regarded as antisemitic. Israel-related antisemitism is the most frequent form experienced online[7] and the EU is working towards an EU free from antisemitism.

    The non-legally binding working definition of antisemitism by the IHRA serves as a benchmark for the Commission’s work to combat antisemitism. EU funding is used for projects in line and for the implementation of the EU Strategy on combating antisemitism and fostering Jewish life.

    • [1] https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-14245-2024-INIT/en/pdf
    • [2] https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2024/10/15/fostering-jewish-life-and-combating-antisemitism-council-approves-declaration/
    • [3] https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2022/03/04/council-adopts-conclusions-on-combating-racism-and-antisemitism/
    • [4] https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2018/12/06/fight-against-antisemitism-council-declaration/
    • [5] https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/policies/justice-and-fundamental-rights/combatting-discrimination/racism-and-xenophobia/combating-antisemitism/eu-strategy-combating-antisemitism-and-fostering-jewish-life-2021-2030/first-progress-report-eu-strategy-combating_en
    • [6] https://holocaustremembrance.com/resources/working-definition-antisemitism
    • [7] https://fra.europa.eu/en/publication/2018/experiences-and-perceptions-antisemitism-second-survey-discrimination-and-hate, p. 25.
    Last updated: 7 May 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Lack of parliamentary oversight over the EU agri-food chain Observatory – E-001039/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The EU agri-food chain observatory (AFCO) was launched in 2024 as one of the actions that aim to strengthen the position of farmers in the food supply chain and reinforce trust between actors.

    As set out in its Terms of Reference[1], the purpose of AFCO is to advise the Commission and to exchange information and discuss, based on available evidence and facts, with a view to establishing a common diagnosis of the situation across markets, and bring increased transparency on prices, cost structure, margin distribution and added value in the supply chain, while respecting confidentiality and competition rules.

    Expert groups, such as AFCO, provide advice and expertise and do not engage in policy discussions. In line with its Terms of Reference, any recommendation of the group would only represent an input to policy making, providing facts and data to inform policy responses by the Commission and other policy-makers. Such analysis can support legislative proposals and discussions by the co-legislators.

    Members of AFCO are Member States’ authorities and organisations representing stakeholders operating in two or more EU Member States, and active in at least one stage of the food supply chain.

    Stakeholder organisations were selected by the Commission through a public call for applications in line with rules for the creation and operation of Commission expert groups[2].

    The objective was to gather experts from all along the food supply chain. The European Parliament’s Secretariat of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development has an observer status to the group and regularly participates in its meetings.

    • [1] https://ec.europa.eu/transparency/expert-groups-register/screen/expert-groups/consult?lang=en&groupID=3949
    • [2] C(2016) 3301 final.
    Last updated: 7 May 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Transposition of the Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Directive 92/43/EEC on the protection status of the wolf – E-001288/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    As stated in Recital 6 of the Commission proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and the Council amending the Habitats Directive[1] as regards the protection status of the wolf (Canis lupus)[2], pursuant to Article 193 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Member States are allowed to maintain or introduce more stringent measures to protect the environment than those already in place, as long as they are compatible with the Treaties and are notified to the Commission.

    In case Member States intend to maintain a higher protection level of the wolf at national level, this should be signaled at the time of the notification of their transposition measures to the Commission, within 18 months from publication of the amending directive in the Official Journal of the European Union. This does not require adopting any specific new legal instrument.

    • [1] Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora, OJ L 206, 22.7.1992, p. 7-50.
    • [2] Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Directive 92/43/EEC as regards the protection status of the wolf (Canis lupus), COM/2025/106 final.
    Last updated: 7 May 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Economics: DG Okonjo-Iweala: Broad agreement on WTO reform as “central priority” for MC14

    Source: WTO

    Headline: DG Okonjo-Iweala: Broad agreement on WTO reform as “central priority” for MC14

    “We are now in the midst of one of the largest disruptions in world trade in history,” the Director-General told members.  “But we are also now less than a year away from MC14, and we must think of what we need to do to maximize our chances for success there, including tackling some of the issues thrown up by this trade crisis.”
    Against this backdrop, DG Okonjo-Iweala said, she has spent the past few weeks engaging with members to discuss what might constitute a credible roadmap to MC14, which will begin on 26 March 2026 in Yaoundé, Cameroon.
    The Director-General said members stressed the importance of MC14 sending a clear political message reaffirming the WTO’s relevance and resilience amidst ongoing global uncertainty.  There was also strong support for prioritizing WTO repositioning and reform at MC14, she noted.
    In regard to substance, many members have proposed forward-looking corrective actions to inadequacies in the WTO’s existing rulebook, together with reforms across core functions, including monitoring and transparency, negotiations, and dispute settlement, she said.
    “The present disruption is seen as a vital opportunity to address the system’s weaknesses and reposition the WTO for the future,” the Director-General said.  “We must not waste a crisis.”
    As part of this, workstreams could be established on issues such as dispute settlement reform, how to ensure the current WTO agreements remain dynamic and relevant, and looking at future trade rules so that the WTO remains responsive to evolving needs, the Director-General said. 
    She proposed a phased approach, consisting of a facilitator-led scoping exercise prior to MC14, ministerial guidance at MC14 on actionable steps for moving forward, and post-MC14 implementation within the workstreams, with the view to presenting concrete outcomes for endorsement at the 15th Ministerial Conference or earlier.
    “We must seize this reform opportunity with seriousness and urgency,” the Director-General declared. Members “need to consider not what the organization can do for us, but what we are willing to give up to reform the organization so it can survive and thrive.”
    The Director-General noted other priority areas identified for MC14, including agriculture, the “second wave” of fisheries subsidies negotiations, the e-commerce work programme and moratorium, the incorporation of the Investment Facilitation for Development Agreement and the joint initiative e-commerce agreement into the WTO framework, and development issues.
    On all these issues, a stocktaking of the progress made will take place in July, and by December members “will need to make a clear decision on which negotiating issues are mature enough to be carried forward to MC14, and which are not,” the Director-General said.  “The overarching goal in all this is to enable productive and meaningful ministerial engagement in Yaoundé.”
    Reports from negotiating chairs
    Members received updates from the chairs of the ongoing WTO negotiations on agriculture, fisheries subsidies, trade and development, the establishment of a multilateral system of notification and registration of geographical indications for wines and spirits, trade and environment, and services.
    Reporting in his capacity as Chair of the agriculture negotiations, Ambassador Ali Sarfraz Hussain (Pakistan) noted his consultations with members and the first negotiating group meeting since his appointment as Chair earlier this year.  He said there was “broad recognition” that delivering an outcome on agriculture is “critical for reinforcing the credibility of the WTO” but acknowledged that on substance, “the main positions have not shifted significantly.”
    On the way forward, the Chair said he would first give proponents space to intensify their engagement and then hold targeted meetings with both proponents and non-proponents to explore ways forward. This would be followed by open-ended meetings of the negotiating group, whenever needed, to ensure full transparency and inclusivity.  This could lead to a stocktaking event in late September or early October after which members will collectively assess the progress made and decide on the best path forward, including the nature of any possible outcomes at MC14.
    Reporting in his capacity as the Chair of the fisheries subsidies negotiations, Ambassador Einar Gunnarsson (Iceland) noted that he led a series of bilateral consultations in late March/early April to hear views on the next steps.  In light of this, the Chair said he would organize meetings over the coming weeks to exchange views on the “second wave” negotiations as well as the entry into force and implementation of the Agreement on Fisheries Subsidies, where 14 acceptances are still needed.
    In regard to the former, the Chair said four focused sessions would take place to give members the opportunity to bring a new thinking into the negotiations that could unlock the current stalemate.  Noting that an existing draft text exists which embodies “painstaking negotiation and numerous hard-fought compromises,” the Chair said: “We need not reinvent the wheel … with the right level of engagement and flexibility, meaningful progress remains within reach.”
    Reporting in her capacity as Chair of the negotiations on trade and development, Ambassador Kadra Hassan (Djibouti) noted that work is continuing through the facilitator-led processes in three areas of work: sanitary and phytosanitary measures and technical barriers to trade; technology transfer; and trade-related investment measures.  She also noted the mandate from ministers at MC13 to continue work on the application of special and differential treatment provisions under various WTO agreements.  With MC14 drawing closer, the Chair called for “further flexibility, creativity and pragmatism from all delegations” in order to achieve outcomes.
    Ambassador Alfredo Suescum (Panama), Chair of the negotiations on the multilateral register for wines and spirits, said that no new proposals have been submitted and that members’ underlying positions remain unchanged. Ambassador Eunice M. Tembo Luambia (Zambia), Chair of the negotiations on trade and environment, said that her consultations with members made clear that WTO members “have no appetite to engage in negotiations on this topic at this time.” 
    Ambassador Adamu Mohammed Abdulhamid (Nigeria), Chair of the services negotiations, said he was in the process of consulting with members on the way forward in view of the built-in mandate to improve schedules of commitments, as well as the call by ministers at MC13 to reinvigorate work. 
    General Council Chair report on informal consultations
    The Chair of the General Council, Saqer Abdullah Almoqbel (Saudi Arabia, Kingdom of), reported on his recent informal consultations with members to explore the nexus between the current economic climate and its impact on the multilateral trading system.
    The assessment is clear, the Chair said: “The situation is challenging, but our resolve must be stronger. There is a firm belief that the WTO and the rules-based multilateral trading system it embodies must remain a cornerstone of our collective response to the challenges. Indeed, many members see this as an opportunity for the WTO to reaffirm its relevance and proactively address the current situation.”
    The Chair said he was considering convening an informal information session at the level of heads of delegations. This would start with a factual presentation on the current situation by WTO economists followed by a forward-looking exchange among heads of delegations on steps the WTO could take to address these impacts, particularly for the most vulnerable economies.

    Share

    MIL OSI Economics

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Interview with ABC News Breakfast

    Source: Australian Attorney General’s Agencies

    James Glenday, Host: On federal politics, Don Farrell joins us now from Parliament House. Don, good morning and welcome back to News Breakfast.

    Trade Minister, Don Farrell: Good morning, James.

    Glenday: On the final sitting day, could you have imagined returning to Canberra knowing that you’d knocked off the Liberal Party’s leader, Peter Dutton, and the leader of The Greens, Adam Bandt as well?

    Minister Farrell: Well, the truth is, James, I don’t think anybody could have predicted that. I was confident, based on the work that we’d done over the previous three years, especially in my space, of trade, that we would be returned and returned with a majority. But even I couldn’t believe the results as they came in on Saturday night. I think the Greens have suffered because so many times in the last Parliament they blocked sensible policies of the Albanese Government. They voted with the Coalition in the Senate to block, for instance, legislation on housing, sensible housing policy, and I think they’ve paid the political price for that.

    Glenday: This outcome must be deeply satisfying for you. Personally, I just wonder, have you ever felt so satisfied after an election win? Where does this rank? Is it the sweetest victory, almost a fairytale for Labor?

    Minister Farrell: Look, it doesn’t, doesn’t get any better than this, James. When you’ve been involved in politics as long as I have, this has to be the sweetest victory of all.

    Glenday: There you go. Now there’s a trade war happening. I’m not sure where you’re going to end up, but if you are reinstalled as Trade Minister, you’ll have a lot on your plate. Do you know where you’ll head?

    Minister Farrell: First of all, look, we’ve got a number of objectives that we will need to prosecute and prosecute very quickly. On election night I got messages from my European colleagues, they’re very keen to re-engage and have another crack at an EU free trade agreement. The EU has 450 million people, and a $17 trillion economy. They’ll be very important if we can get a breakthrough there. The Indians also contacted me. We were very close to a new free trade agreement with them and I think we can move very quickly now to finalise that agreement. And of course, in the next few weeks, our new free trade agreement with the United Arab Emirates, which sends all of our products into the UAE tariff free, will come into force and that will be important. And of course we, we want to continue discussions with the United States. We believe in free and fair trade and that’s the argument we’ll be prosecuting with them.

    Glenday: I think it’ll be closely watched. Do you expect to head to either China or to the States first?

    Minister Farrell: Look, we’ll worry about that after we know who the new Trade Minister is next week.

    Glenday: That’s fair.

    Minister Farrell: But we will move very quickly to ensure that Australia’s interests are protected here. China, of course, is our largest trading partner. We’re concerned about the tariff war between China and the United States. We believe in free and fair trade and we think that those tariffs should be removed on China.

    Glenday: Okay. You are a factional leader of the Labor right. You were once unkindly referred to as a faceless man. Of course you do have a face. And here you are speaking to us. What are you asking the Prime Minister for though? You’ve got a lot of influence as these Ministerial portfolios are carved up.

    Minister Farrell: A face that a mother could love. And they do call me other things too, by the way. That’s not the only thing they call me. Look, I’m not going to give the Prime Minister any advice on what he should do. He’s won a fabulous victory here. He ran a flawless campaign. His strategy throughout the whole of the last term was about getting reelected and continuing the policies that we took to the election. I’m very happy to leave it all to him and to accept whatever he might wish me to do in the new government.

    Glenday: Ok, just before I let you go, I want to get you on an international issue that’s been developing. Has the Albanese government made any contact with India or Pakistan regarding these cross border strikes we’re seeing?

    Minister Farrell: Look, that’s an issue of course, that is in the hands of our very competent and successful Foreign Minister, Penny Wong. But of course we don’t want to see any conflict in our region. We’d like to see an end to the conflict in the Middle East, the conflict in Ukraine, Russia, and we certainly don’t want to see any conflict in our own region.

    Glenday: And Don, just one last one. We saw smoke this morning from the Vatican. You went to the Pope’s funeral. I’m not sure what that was like, but do you have a personal preference of who the next Pope should be or the direction of the Catholic Church? I’m guessing this is outside the bounds of your factional influence.

    Minister Farrell: Well, as a matter of fact, James, I do have a personal favourite in the Conclave at the moment. And that is the Australian – Ukrainian Cardinal, Cardinal Bychok. I was lucky enough to meet with him twice while I was in Rome. He’s a very, very fine man. A very holy man. I’d like to see him as the next pope. My wife, on the other hand, who’s Filipino, she would like to see Cardinal Tagle as the next pope. And we also had the opportunity of meeting him at the Vatican. So, there’s a couple of candidates for you, James.

    Glenday: There you go. Well, we’ll have to wait and see if you’ve backed a winner there, Don Farrell, the Trade Minister. Perhaps the continuing Trade Minister. We’ll wait and see for that as well. Thank you so much for joining News Breakfast this morning.

    Minister Farrell: Thanks, James.

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Doorstop, Canberra

    Source: Australian Attorney General’s Agencies

    Journalist: Thank you for joining us. Congratulations on Labor’s win. Firstly, it’s removed two leaders, Peter Dutton and Adam Bandt, at the last count. How are you feeling about the landslide?

    Trade Minister, Don Farrell: Well, very positive. I think it’s a very positive endorsement of Prime Minister Albanese and the flawless campaign that he ran. He had a vision for Australia. I don’t think any of the other candidates from the other parties had that vision. I think the Australian people have now overwhelmingly endorsed Anthony Albanese’s vision for the future of Australia.

    Journalist: And the Labor caucus will meet here tomorrow. Will you remain as Trade Minister?

    Minister Farrell: Look, that’s entirely in the hands of the Prime Minister. I’ll be putting myself forward this afternoon and tomorrow for the ministerial positions. What job I get in that new ministry will be entirely in the hands of the Prime Minister. Obviously, I really like the job as Trade Minister and I’d like to continue. But I’m happy to serve Prime Minister Albanese in any way he thinks I should.

    Journalist: I believe you are safe. That has been confirmed as the leadership team will stay the same. Where would your first trip be?

    Minister Farrell: Well, that’ll be up to the Prime Minister. I know he has some plans to visit some countries and I’d be very happy to go with him if he wanted me to do that. On election night, I got messages from both the Europeans and the Indians indicating that they’re very keen to continue with the discussions to get free trade agreements. Obviously, we’ve got the UAE free trade agreement coming up in a few weeks that will allow all Australian products to go into the UAE tariff-free. So, we’re in the business of supporting free and fair trade and arguing wherever we can that the best interests of Australia and the rest of the world is served by free and fair trade.

    Journalist: How are we going securing a tariff carve out with the Trump administration?

    Minister Farrell: Look, we’re continuing to prosecute that argument. Obviously, we’ve been in caretaker mode for the last five weeks, but our Ambassador, of course, Kevin Rudd, is doing a really good job in the United States prosecuting the argument on our behalf and will continue to do that.

    Journalist: And a difficult time between the United States and China, are we making any headway? How do you plan to tackle that relationship going forward?

    Minister Farrell: Our argument is very simple. The way to prosperity is through free trade. Tariffs are the wrong way to go and I think we’ll quickly see in the United States that inflation goes up, unemployment goes up and the share market goes down. None of those are good for working people. We want to prosecute the argument with the United States with China that tariffs are not the way to go and both countries should remove their tariffs. Thank you.

    Journalist: Thank you very much.

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: GAZA – PSNA joins with NZ Māori Council for call to action on Gaza

    Source: Palestinian Solidarity Network Aotearoa (PSNA)

    PSNA and the NZ Māori Council are jointly publishing advertisements today in the Post, Press and Waikato Times calling on the government to end its silence and take action on the Israeli genocide and ethnic cleansing in Gaza.

    The Israeli blockage on all food, fuel and other essential supplies entering Gaza is now into its third month.

    PSNA Co-Chair John Minto says, during the first year or so of the Israeli genocide in Gaza, Foreign Minister Winston Peters had been making statements warning Israel that it must not break the rules of international humanitarian law.

    “Israel went ahead and flattened all of Gaza, displaced most of the people in the region and is now starving them.  Israeli forces have killed tens of thousands – mostly civilians.  It has attacked an international aid convoy in the western Mediterranean.  It is bombing Syria again.  These are all clearly war crimes.”

    “Our government’s response has been to stop saying anything.  It is giving licence to Israel to do anything it wants.”

    “Since our advertisement was signed off, Israel has announced it will intensify its attacks on Gaza, openly declared its plans to cleanse the Palestinian population and that its forces will remain in Gaza indefinitely, leading to a return of Israeli settlements there.

    “Added to the increasing rate of ethnic cleansing in the Occupied West Bank, Israel has clearly signalled it intends to finish the job of depopulating Palestine of Palestinians which it began in 1948,” Minto says.

    In the UK parliament MPs from across the house have united in condemning Israel’s actions but not a peep from our government. (ref. https://youtube.com/watch?v=f9dws0yuaPY&feature=shared )

    We expect the media to hold this government to account for its silent complicity with Israel’s heinous crimes.

    John Minto
    Co-National Chair
    Palestine Solidarity Network Aotearoa.

    MIL OSI New Zealand News

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Myanmar: Life-saving education funding must be restored following USAID cuts

    Source: Amnesty International

    The United States and other governments must urgently find funding for education programmes in Myanmar that were a lifeline for students, teachers and families in the war-torn country, Amnesty International said today, as it warned of a “lost generation” if no action is taken.

    Testimony from teachers and students gathered by Amnesty International showed the impact on Myanmar students of US President Donald Trump’s sweeping cuts to foreign aid, which included the termination of more than US$70 million in funding for education programmes in Myanmar, according to those involved in the efforts.

    “The battering of Myanmar’s education sector since the 2021 military coup has robbed millions of young people of opportunities. These US cuts to education programmes now make the prospect of a lost generation increasingly likely,” said Joe Freeman, Amnesty International’s Myanmar Researcher.

    “But it is not too late to fill this vacuum in Myanmar students’ education. Governments and universities in the US and beyond must find a way to enable them to continue their studies and prevent them being sent back to a conflict zone, where they are at risk of arbitrary detention, torture and other ill-treatment; aerial and ground attacks on their communities; and forced conscription into a military that routinely resorts to human rights abuses as a strategy of war.”

    The US-funded education programmes, enacted after the coup, supported Myanmar students studying at Southeast Asian universities; online higher education initiatives; and basic education services for children in ethnic, remote and rural communities.

    They were a rare bright spot in an ever-deteriorating human rights situation in the country, where to date more than 6,000 civilians have been killed and more than 20,000 detained. In 2025, nearly 20 million people are expected to need humanitarian assistance.

    A 7.7-magnitude earthquake that struck central Myanmar on 28 March 2025, killing nearly 4,000 people and destroying hospitals, homes, monasteries and at least 1,000 schools, has only exacerbated these needs. It will also create additional hurdles for students seeking an education after more than four years of armed conflict in the country.

    “The US cuts to foreign aid made a bad situation worse. The Trump administration must reverse course and not abandon Myanmar students working to fulfill their dreams under extremely challenging circumstances. But if the US continues to fail Myanmar’s young people, other governments, universities and donors must step up and help,” Joe Freeman said.

    Myanmar education sector in turmoil

    After the Myanmar military seized power on 1 February 2021, teachers and students walked out of schools in protest, entering a parallel education system under the deposed civilian government with new schools built from scratch, using existing buildings such as people’s homes and carried out online.

    The military responded by arresting teachers and attacking schools with air strikes, as armed conflict intensified across the country, especially in places where schools in areas outside of military control were functioning. The overall situation led to a sharp decline in enrolment rates, limited access to functioning schools and a shortage in materials for teaching. Against this backdrop the US-funded education programmes carried out vital work to fill the void while also helping shield students, teachers and parents from human rights abuses.

    Since late last year, Amnesty International has conducted remote and in-person interviews with more than 50 people involved in education across Myanmar from Chin, Rakhine, Kayah and Karenni States, as well as Magwe, Sagaing and Mandalay Regions and individuals living in exile.  They include students, teachers, education officials, parents and survivors of air strikes on schools. All stressed the vital importance of education for the future of the country, despite the constant disruptions in providing it.

    One teacher told Amnesty International: “Even when I’m teaching, I’m always on edge, especially when I hear aircraft overhead. There have been moments when I’ve heard the sound of artillery while teaching, which is deeply unsettling.”

    Another said: “The main goal now is to prevent any disruption to the children’s learning, so schools have been reopened wherever possible. However, the quality of education isn’t as high as it was before the coup, mainly because of the constant need to relocate due to safety concerns. Teachers and students often have to flee both day and night, which disrupts the learning process.”

    Among the most recent interviewees were recipients of a US-funded initiative called the Diversity and Inclusion Scholarship Program (DISP). Launched in 2024, this USD45 million USAID-funded programme aimed to support 1,000 students from Myanmar to study in universities online and across Southeast Asia in Cambodia, Indonesia, the Philippines and Thailand.

    But it became an early and very public victim of President Trump’s attacks on anything related to diversity, equity and inclusion. One of his first announcements as president was to cancel the program, singling it out again in his joint remarks to Congress in March.

    “While the US administration has falsely portrayed this programme as a prime example of wasteful spending, it is anything but. The students we spoke to describe the programme as providing a safe haven to them in times of war back home and of reinvigorating their dreams,” Joe Freeman said.

    Miranda, 18, was in high school when the coup happened, and like other students participated in protests. Her family later fled to eastern Myanmar, where she witnessed gunfights and bombings, eventually crossing over into Thailand to seek shelter.

    “When I got the [DISP] scholarship it was like a golden chance for me to start my new life again,” said Miranda, who was pursuing a degree in tourism management in the Philippines.

    She had only finished her first semester when the programme was cancelled, making her one of hundreds across the region without support.

    “If we have to go back to our country … we will be lost again.”

    Oakley, a student from central Myanmar, faces similar challenges. But when he received the DISP scholarship, it gave him hope of a better future.

    “I have experienced a lot of bomb explosions, a lot of war around my village. That is really devastating,” he told Amnesty International. “I believed that this was my life-changing opportunity. I feel shocked and so hopeless.”

    Students like Miranda and Oakley fear going back to Myanmar, where they could be arrested for supporting anti-coup protests or be among Myanmar’s many victims of air strikes.

    “Even though we want to go back to Myanmar, we cannot,” Oakley said. “The situation in Myanmar is not safe anymore.”

    MIL OSI New Zealand News

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Advocacy Events – Protests against the Government’s Pay Equity legislation – PSA

    Source: PSA

    The Government’s unconstitutional and undemocratic rushing through the House of legislation that denies pay equity for workers in female dominated professions has sparked a huge public backlash.
    As a result of this widespread outrage a number of protests are being planned by groups around the country in the next two days.
    PSA National Secretary Fleur Fitzsimons says: “We welcome this outpouring of support that is growing organically in the community for opposing these unconstitutional and undemocratic law changes.
    “The changes will take money from underpaid, predominantly female workers to plug the gap in the Government’s budget caused by its reckless, unaffordable policies such as multi-billion dollar tax relief for landlords.
    “We will be relentlessly campaigning against the pay equity changes between now and the next election,” Fitzsimons says.
    Details of protests
    Auckland – Friday 9 May 1pm Outside Minister Brooke van Valden’s electorate office, 35 St Johns Road, St John
    Hamilton – Friday 9 May 1pm Outside Minister Tama Potaka’s electorate Office, 109 Rostrevor St.
    Tauranga – Friday 9 May 12.30pm Red Square, Spring Street
    Feilding – Friday 9 May 1pm Outside MP Suze Redmayne’s electorate office, 51 Fergusson St
    Levin – Saturday 10 May 1pm Outside MP Tim Costley’s electorate office, corner of Bath and Oxford Street
    Nelson – Saturday 10 May 11am March meeting at Millers Acre carpark on Halifax St
    Rolleston, Canterbury – Friday 9 May 1pm Outside Minister Nicola Grigg’s electorate office, Shop 34, Rolleston Square – 9 Masefield Drive
    Timaru – Friday 9 May 1pm Outside Minister James Meager’s electorate office, 30 Canon Street, Timaru Central
    Dunedin – Friday 9 May 1.30pm The Exchange – cnr of Princes & Rattray Street.
    The Public Service Association Te Pūkenga Here Tikanga Mahi is Aotearoa New Zealand’s largest trade union, representing and supporting more than 95,000 workers across central government, state-owned enterprises, local councils, health boards and community groups.

    MIL OSI New Zealand News

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Release: Fewer jobs and opportunities for Māori, again

    Source:

    In the last 12 months life has only got worse for Māori under Christopher Luxon’s Government.

    Earlier this year Māori unemployment was a staggering 8.9 percent. It has now gone up to 10.5 percent in the latest figures today – that’s 7000 more Māori unemployed.

    “The Government simply doesn’t care about workers and certainly doesn’t care about Māori,” Labour spokesperson for Social Development and Māori Development, Willie Jackson said.

    “Māori are tired of been kicked in the guts by this Government, we have had enough. Now wāhine Māori are bearing the brunt of the Government’s changes too, as claims for pay equity are shoved aside.

    “These figures are unacceptable and are made worse by the deliberate choices to make life harder for Māori.

    “Louise Upston and Tama Potaka have failed miserably to address Māori employment rates.

    “I have no faith that this government will be able to deliver anything meaningful for Māori other than more cuts to Māori initiatives to prop up their tobacco and property developer mates,” Willie Jackson said.


    Stay in the loop by signing up to our mailing list and following us on FacebookInstagram, and X

    MIL OSI New Zealand News

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Release: Labour fights for firefighters

    Source:

    The Labour Party backs volunteer firefighters who are currently not covered by ACC for workplace disease and mental injury and is drafting policy to put this right when the party wins the election in 2026.

    “Volunteer firefighters make up 86 percent of the Fire and Emergency frontline workforce, however they are not eligible for the same ACC coverage as paid firefighters as the law currently stands. This needs to change,” Labour ACC spokesperson Camilla Belich said. 

    “We cannot have majority of our firefighters, who put their lives on the line to save others, with inadequate support.

    “Just as their paid counterparts, volunteer firefighters are exposed to many traumatic incidents, which can result in mental illnesses such as PTSD. Their work also exposes them to a range of gradual workplace illnesses.

    “I accepted a petition today signed by more than 35,000 people who share the view that legislation should be changed to allow for volunteer firefighters to access ACC.

    “People who put their lives at risk for others should have support if they are injured or ill as a result of their service,” Camilla Belich said.


    Stay in the loop by signing up to our mailing list and following us on FacebookInstagram, and X

    MIL OSI New Zealand News

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Pre-Budget speech to BusinessNZ

    Source: NZ Music Month takes to the streets

    Good afternoon everyone. 

    Today my intention is to put this year’s Budget in context. 

    First, I want to speak briefly about our economic recovery here at home, and why I remain confident despite international uncertainty. 

    Then I’m going to make the case for the two big priorities of Budget 2025, fiscal consolidation and economic growth: why they matter and some steps we’re taking to make them happen.

    It’s fair to say Budget 2025 arrives against a challenging international backdrop. 

    Trade tensions overseas have seen growth forecasts revised down across the world, as exporters and consumers come under sustained pressure. 

    The sharp deterioration of financial markets in early April have somewhat recovered in recent days and weeks, but markets remain volatile. 

    Experts offshore are leaning into the uncertainty. 

    The Bank of Canada even chose to publish two separate scenarios in their latest statement, instead of one single set of forecasts.

    I don’t blame them for having a bob each way. 

    For a small, open economy like New Zealand, the international environment clearly matters a lot, but I remain confident about our recovery. 

    Inflation remains anchored below 3 per cent, and interest rates continue to fall, supporting households with the cost of living and providing the foundation for a domestic economic recovery. 

    The Official Cash Rate has fallen considerably, from 5.5 to 3.5 per cent, with economists picking further cuts are on the way soon. 

    I acknowledge for households, interest rate relief will be a slow and steady process.  

    For example, according to the Reserve Bank, average interest rates on outstanding mortgages have only now fallen for just 4 months in a row, having previously risen for 37 months in a row. 

    The good news is that financial relief for households will keep rolling, with around $60 billion of mortgages set to roll-over in just the next three months. 

    In short, the trend is our friend, even if I know many families and businesses won’t be feeling that relief quite yet. 

    At the same time, an export-led recovery is now well underway in regional New Zealand. 

    Dairy prices are strong, despite global headwinds, supporting farmers to pay down debt and put more money back into rural communities. 

    Fruit exports are booming, hitting $5 billion in value in the 12 months to March, driven by a big jump in kiwifruit sales. 

    The tourism industry is also growing rapidly, with visitor numbers continuing to recover, now hitting 86 per cent of pre-COVID levels. 

    Total tourism expenditure was up 23 per cent in 2024.

    It’s not surprising then that the recovery is looking brighter in regional New Zealand, and the South Island in particular.     

    Just last week Westpac highlighted that in Otago, Canterbury, and Southland, consumer confidence and growth in retail activity is outpacing the rest of the country. 

    Our government is working hard to support that rural recovery. 

    A steady diet of pro-growth deregulation, a strong focus on RMA reform, and fresh efforts to break into new markets offshore are highlights of that agenda so far. 

    We know the difference quality trade agreements can make to our growth prospects. For example, in the 12 months since the EU FTA came into force, exports to the European Union grew by 25 per cent.

    For exporters, that’s worth an additional $1 billion. 

    Whether it’s CER, the CPTPP, the China, UK, or more recent UAE and GCC FTAs, our farmers and exporters are blessed by a latticework of trade agreements, negotiated successively by Ministers and diplomats over many years.

    Clearly India will be an important next step, and it was positive to see Minister of Trade Todd McClay announce on Monday that the first formal round of FTA negotiations kicked off this week. 

    That brings me to this year’s Budget.

    It won’t surprise you to learn that lifting New Zealand’s long run economic performance has been our primary focus in designing Budget 2025. 

    Yes, that has shaped decisions we have made on individual initiatives, some of which I’ll touch on shortly. 

    But our fiscal strategy, including our desire to return to surplus, and the wider impact on inflation, interest rates, and growth has also been front of mind. 

    You might have seen Nicola Willis announce last week that this year’s operating allowance would be smaller than previously signalled, at just $1.3 billion. 

    That will be the smallest operating allowance in a decade and ensures Treasury can still forecast a surplus within the next four years. 

    That was the right decision for several reasons. 

    First, it represents a fresh commitment to necessary fiscal consolidation. 

    In recent years, New Zealand has been living beyond its means and that has come at a significant cost. 

    Since 2017, net core Crown debt has risen by around $120 billion.

    Put another way, that’s $60,000 in additional debt for every household in New Zealand. 

    As a proportion of the economy, debt has ballooned from just 21.6 per cent of GDP in 2017, to around 43 per cent of GDP today, higher than it has been at any time since the 1990s. 

    At the same time, the cost of servicing our national debt has more than doubled, from $3.5 billion in 2017, to almost $9 billion today.

    In some areas, spending more is the right thing to do. 

    In health, education, law and order, defence, and transport my government is prioritising significant new investments. 

    Each of those areas are a priority for New Zealanders and they require more funding to deliver the quality services Kiwis expect. 

    But that comes with trade-offs.  

    Spending more on everything, as some commentators have called for, would mean larger deficits, more debt, and ultimately fewer choices in future budgets as the cost of servicing our debt grows even larger and the prospect of returning to surplus evaporates. 

    Managing and responding to critical risks is also more challenging with high levels of public debt. 

    New Zealand was well served in the Global Financial Crisis, following the Christchurch Earthquake, and during COVID because successive Ministers of Finance made difficult choices to ensure New Zealand had low levels of public debt. 

    Our responsibility is to do what we can to leave a similar inheritance for future administrations. 

    Second, a smaller allowance supports lower interest rates and stronger business activity. 

    Sadly, recent experiences have forced us to re-learn the fundamentals of economics, including the reality that if governments borrow and spend too much, interest rates are forced higher to compensate, putting pressure on family budgets and private sector activity. 

    The good news is that the converse is also true. 

    More restrained fiscal policy supports interest rates to remain low, enabling businesses to grow and families to get ahead under their own steam. 

    ANZ’s initial estimate last week was that the smaller operating allowance would support interest rates being 5-10 basis points lower than otherwise. 

    Meanwhile, Treasury has estimated that with a tighter budget package, interest rates would be up to 30 basis points lower by the end of the forecast period. 

    For a family with a mortgage, or a farmer or entrepreneur taking on debt to grow their business, that means real financial relief and more opportunity to get ahead. 

    Careful spending, low interest rates, and robust private sector growth sits at the very heart of our government’s economic strategy, as we create jobs, boost exports, lift incomes, and promote innovation and investment.

    Prudent fiscal management also supports our economic reputation offshore. 

    For a small-open economy like New Zealand that’s critical. 

    It means we can borrow more affordably when we have to, and guarantees that even in periods of global turmoil, we are a trusted destination for trade and investment. 

    Third, the smaller operating allowance was the right call because keeping our word matters.  

    Nicola Willis has been consistent in her commitment to deliver a path back to surplus and to maintain debt at prudent levels. 

    Conditions can and do change, but it is a credit to her that Budget 2025 demonstrates a return to surplus, despite a challenging global backdrop.  

    That’s the result you expect when you anchor Budget decisions in your fiscal strategy, instead of allowing the pressures of the day to drag you off course. 

    I know there are some commentators calling for larger allowances and more spending. 

    They need to be honest that those decisions will mean more debt, more deficits, and an indefinite delay to New Zealand’s return to surplus. 

    More debt and more deficits is a fiscal strategy – but for a small, internationally-exposed country like New Zealand, it’s also an incredibly risky one. 

    At the same time, just as grey clouds bring silver linings, even tight Budgets present opportunities. 

    In Budget 2025, we will be taking further steps in our long-term mission to lift economic growth and boost productivity.  

    Earlier this year, we published our Government’s Going for Growth Agenda, which outlines a range of actions we are taking to get the New Zealand economy moving and realising its vast potential.

    Each of those actions fits into one of five pillars we have identified as critical to lifting economic growth and improving New Zealanders’ standard of living:

    Developing talent,
    Encouraging innovation, science, and technology,
    Introducing competitive business settings,
    Promoting global trade and investment,
    And delivering infrastructure for growth.

    Each of those pillars will have strong representation in Budget 2025. 

    Today I want to touch on just a few of them – and some small steps we are taking to underpin our growth mission. 

    Encouraging science, innovation, and technology is one of those key pillars. 

    In January at my State of the Nation, I spoke briefly about our vision for the sector. 

    I want to see a much sharper focus on commercialisation, stronger ties to the business community, and rapid access to ideas and innovation from overseas. 

    Capital investment will be critical to our growth journey, but New Zealand won’t achieve a step-change in our living standards if we invest more but continue to lag behind the global technological frontier. 

    In Budget 2025, we will be allocating the funding we need to give effect to the changes I announced earlier this year, including the establishment of three new Public Research Organisations. 

    I also know that following a review of the Research and Development Tax Incentive that kicked off last year, the business community has been looking for some certainty on the future of the programme.

    That review was required in law, and the final report has not yet been tabled in Parliament. 

    However, I can confirm today that we are retaining the RDTI in this year’s Budget so businesses have the certainty they need to keep investing and keep going for growth.

    Promoting global trade and investment has also been a focus of my government in 2025, even before the recent bout of uncertainty offshore. 

    As I said earlier, part of that task has been to bring fresh energy to New Zealand’s proud history of achieving trade agreements offshore, with Minister of Trade Todd McClay finalising two new trade agreements in the Middle East, while we continue to work hard towards a trade agreement with India. 

    But promoting New Zealand as an attractive destination for investment, and a shelter from the global storm, has also been a personal focus of mine. 

    In March, the government hosted an Investment Summit here in Auckland, with attendees representing an estimated $6 trillion in capital, as we showcased opportunities to partner with the Crown, Iwi, and the private sector.

    We are seeing some real progress, including an outstanding deal worth around $1 billion signed by Waikato Tainui and Brookfield Asset Management to further develop the Ruakura Inland Port.

    But of course, I want to see more. 

    Yes, that means getting the structural settings right, including rewriting the Overseas Investment Act, so major investments from offshore are consented faster and more reliably. 

    But for small countries – who have to compete hard for share of mind and share of wallet – we also need a team of national champions constantly making the case for New Zealand as an outstanding place to do business. 

    In January, I announced that team would be led by Invest NZ, an entity specifically responsible for attracting investment to New Zealand, and providing the critical concierge services that have allowed other countries like Ireland and Singapore to punch above their weight. 

    I can confirm today that funding will be allocated for Invest NZ in Budget 2025, ensuring they can crack on and get the job done. 

    Modern, reliable infrastructure – and my government’s efforts to deliver more of it to communities right across the country – will also play a major role in our Going for Growth plan.

    It’s why capital expenditure, including for frontline services like health and education, will be a priority in Budget 2025. 

    As I acknowledged earlier, the operating allowance in this year’s Budget will be a little smaller than previously signalled. 

    However, total capital expenditure allocated in the Budget is a little higher than forecast at $6.8 billion – split across health, education, defence, transport, and other portfolios. 

    When that is offset by savings identified in this year’s budget, it means the net capital allowance is $4 billion, compared to $3.6 billion previously signalled in the Budget Policy Statement. 

    For businesses, that investment represents an opportunity to develop critical skills and capability, promoting growth for many years to come. 

    For Kiwis, it will mean another big investment in the quality frontline services, like health and education, they deserve. 

    The two remaining pillars, our efforts to develop talent and to promote competitive business settings, will also feature prominently in the Budget, but I won’t be making be making announcements in those areas today.

    However, as Nicola Willis confirmed last week and I can confirm again today, there will be a small number of measures in this year’s Budget designed to make it easier for businesses to invest, whether they are based here or offshore.

    If we really want to create high-paying jobs, lift incomes, and make New Zealand a hub for innovation and investment, we need to make our business environment much more attractive. 

    I’m optimistic that Budget 2025 will take some positive steps in that direction. 

    The Minister of Finance was right last week to say Budget 2025 won’t be a lolly scramble.

    It’s not that we can’t afford it, although frankly we can’t. 

    It’s not that it wouldn’t feel good, because it might, for a little while. 

    No, it’s that we have a responsibility to stay disciplined and keep our eyes on the prize. 

    So far, we’re making real progress.

    Inflation is down, interest rates are falling, exports are rising, and the economy is growing. 

    For many New Zealanders, the prospect of a growing economy and rising incomes means a real shot at getting on top of the cost of living. 

    Now is not the time to put that risk. 

    In Budget 2025 that means staying focused, getting back to surplus, and maintaining a relentless focus on economic growth. 

    But for Kiwis, it’s about more than just the dollars and cents. 

    Lower inflation means less stress and less heartbreak, as prices stop skyrocketing and families finally stop falling behind. 

    Lower interest rates means a house becomes a home, not a source of pain and frustration as mortgage repayments crush weekly budgets. 

    And more economic growth means thriving local businesses, higher wages, more jobs, and ultimately more money in your back pocket.

    It means a chance to get ahead and beat the cost of living.  

    And it means we can have confidence that our best days lie ahead.

    New Zealand is the best country on Planet Earth.

    With the right choices, I think we can make it even better. 

    Thank you.

    MIL OSI New Zealand News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Rep. Espaillat Highlights Slate of Congressional Efforts this Congress to Address Climate Change, Ensure Environmental Justice, and Bolster Climate Solutions

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Adriano Espaillat (NY-13)

    NEW YORK, NY — Today, Representative Adriano Espaillat (NY-13) issued the following statement in recognition of Earth Day 2025 and touted several pieces of legislation he leads during the 119th Congress: 

    “On Earth Day, we reaffirm our commitment to adopting climate solutions to save our planet,” said Espaillat. “The difference we make today will have resounding impacts throughout our communities and the future of our society. I am proud to sponsor many critical environmental bills this Congress and remain committed to ensuring a greener, more sustainable future for the next generation.” 

    • The Green Climate Fund Authorization Act — authorizes an additional $8 billion to the Green Climate Fund, supporting climate action projects globally. 
       
    • The Housing Survivors of Major Disasters Act – bipartisan legislation re-introduced with Congresswoman Young Kim (R-CA) in the wake of the California wildfires. The bill eliminates barriers for survivors of natural disasters when seeking housing assistance. 
       
    • Resolution Recognizing Cecil Corbin-Mark honors his significant contributions to the environmental justice movement, working with primarily vulnerable and disadvantaged communities. 
       
    • Secure Electronic Waste Export and Recycling Act bipartisan legislation re-introduced with Congressman Mario Díaz-Balart (R-FL), which curbs the overwhelming flow of electronic waste (“e-waste”) exports from the United States, which bring about national security risks, harm the public health, and cause significant damage to the environment  
       
    • The Solid Waste Infrastructure for Recycling Grant Program (SWIFR) Reauthorization Act — reauthorizes and suggest an increase in funding for the EPA’s most important recycling grant program through 2035. 

    ###

    Representative Espaillat is the first Dominican American to serve in the U.S. House of Representatives and his congressional district includes Harlem, East Harlem, West Harlem, Hamilton Heights, Washington Heights, Inwood, Marble Hill and the north-west Bronx. First elected to Congress in 2016, Representative Espaillat is serving his fifth term in Congress. Representative Espaillat currently serves as a member of the influential U.S. House Committee on Appropriations responsible for funding the federal government’s vital activities and serves as Ranking Member of the Legislative Branch Subcommittee of the committee during the 119th Congress. He is Chairman of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus (CHC), a member of the Congressional Progressive Caucus (CPC), and serves as a Senior Whip of the Democratic Caucus. To find out more about Rep. Espaillat, visit online at https://espaillat.house.gov/

    Media inquiries: Candace Person at Candace.Person@mail.house.gov 

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Espaillat, Bresnahan, Adams, and Miller Introduce Bill to Remove Unjust Barriers

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Adriano Espaillat (NY-13)

    Legislation Would Ensure Job Seekers in Federal Workforce Training Programs Can Maintain Food Security and Employment Training Without Undue Barriers to Career Success

    WASHINGTON, DC – Representatives Adriano Espaillat (NY-13)Rob Bresnahan (PA-08)Max Miller (OH-07), and Alma S. Adams, Ph.D. (NC-12) announced today the reintroduction of the Training and Nutrition Stability Act, which would allow jobseekers in high-quality evidence-based employment and training programs to maintain their nutrition benefits, leading to permanent employment and self-sufficiency. 

    “Currently, individuals in high-quality, evidence-based employment and training programs risk losing their nutrition security because of temporary earnings they receive through their participation,” said Congressman Adriano Espaillat. “Rules on whether these earnings count against SNAP participants’ eligibility are applied inconsistently across federal programs and funding streams, and this misalignment in policy has created confusion and benefit cliffs for affected individuals who are working to invest in their economic future. It is critical that we work to strengthen workforce opportunities and training opportunities so that individuals are not forced to choose between employment opportunity and skills development or food security.”

    “Work is not a dirty word,” said Rep. Bresnahan. “In Northeastern Pennsylvania and across the country, we are facing a skilled-workforce shortage, and businesses are in desperate need of those ready to roll up their sleeves and get to work. This is exactly why we should not punish taking advantage of learn-as-you-earn programs and forcing workers to choose between participation in proven SNAP E&T programs and being able to receive their nutrition benefits.”  

    “Qualified SNAP recipients should have the opportunity to work or seek the education they need to support themselves. This legislation ensures that their nutritional needs are met without forcing them to abandon their goals of breaking out of the cycle of poverty,” said Congressman Max Miller. “This bill was included in the 2024 House Agriculture Committee Farm Bill, and I look forward to seeing it move forward.”

    “You should never have to choose between building a better life for yourself and losing your food security,” said Congresswoman Adams. “I’m proud to support the Training and Nutrition Stability Act to ensure that earnings from employment and training programs do not decrease SNAP benefits. You are not going to be successful if you’re hungry. It’s time we close the training gap so we can support those working hard to support themselves. 

    Last year, after release, more than 8,000 motivated people chose to walk through CEO’s front door. It is a time of hope and renewal. SNAP is a key part of reentry, but many people’s benefits are reduced once they begin a paid job training program.” said Sam Schaeffer, CEO of the Center for Employment Opportunities. “The Training and Nutrition Stability Act will help bridge the gap between workforce development and food security allowing people to provide for their families and build a foundation for lasting independence. CEO is grateful to Representative Espaillat for championing this bipartisan bill, primed to change so many lives. 

    The Training and Nutrition Stability Act would ensure jobseekers in programs authorized under the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA), the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Employment and Training (SNAP E&T), vocational rehabilitation programs, and refugee employment programs to leverage federal job-driven training programs dollars and maintain their nutrition benefits, leading to permanent employment and self-sufficiency.

    ###

    Representative Espaillat is the first Dominican American to serve in the U.S. House of Representatives and his congressional district includes Harlem, East Harlem, West Harlem, Hamilton Heights, Washington Heights, Inwood, Marble Hill and the north-west Bronx. First elected to Congress in 2016, Representative Espaillat is serving his fifth term in Congress. Representative Espaillat currently serves as a member of the influential U.S. House Committee on Appropriations responsible for funding the federal government’s vital activities and serves as Ranking Member of the Legislative Branch Subcommittee of the committee during the 119th Congress. He is Chairman of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus (CHC), a member of the Congressional Progressive Caucus (CPC), and serves as a Senior Whip of the Democratic Caucus. To find out more about Rep. Espaillat, visit online at https://espaillat.house.gov/

    Media inquiries: Candace Person at Candace.Person@mail.house.gov 

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Media Advisory: Representative Adriano Espaillat Leads CHC Press Conference on Deportations of U.S. Citizen Children

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Adriano Espaillat (NY-13)

    WASHINGTON, DC — Tomorrow, Rep. Adriano Espaillat (NY-13), Chair of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus (CHC) will hold a press conference at the U.S. Capitol to address the deportations of U.S. citizen children to Honduras, attacks on due process, and detainee abuse. 

    The Trump administration is doubling down its cruel attacks on immigrant families, forcing mothers into impossible choices about their children’s well-being. It’s a continuation of Trump’s 2018 family separations and this president’s zeal to exploit the suffering of families and children for political gain.

    WHAT: CHC Press Conference

    WHO: 
    ·    CHC Chair Rep. Adriano Espaillat (NY-13)
    ·    Whip Rep. Sylvia Garcia (TX-29)
    ·    Vice Chair of Communications Rep. Norma Torres (CA-35)
    ·    Vice Chair of Diversity and Inclusion Rep. Joaquin Castro (TX-20)
    ·    Rep. Juan Vargas (CA-52)
    ·    Rep. Nanette Barragán (CA-44)
    ·    ACLU Louisiana Legal Director Alanah Odoms
    ·    National Immigration Project Executive Director Sirine Shebaya

    WHEN: Wednesday, April 30th at 12:00 PM

    WHERE: House Triangle, United States Capitol, Washington, DC 20004

    WATCH: Livestream at https://x.com/RepEspaillat

    ###

    Representative Espaillat is the first Dominican American to serve in the U.S. House of Representatives and his congressional district includes Harlem, East Harlem, West Harlem, Hamilton Heights, Washington Heights, Inwood, Marble Hill and the north-west Bronx. First elected to Congress in 2016, Representative Espaillat is serving his fifth term in Congress. Representative Espaillat currently serves as a member of the influential U.S. House Committee on Appropriations responsible for funding the federal government’s vital activities and serves as Ranking Member of the Legislative Branch Subcommittee of the committee during the 119th Congress. He is Chairman of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus (CHC), a member of the Congressional Progressive Caucus (CPC), and serves as a Senior Whip of the Democratic Caucus. To find out more about Rep. Espaillat, visit online at https://espaillat.house.gov/

    Media inquiries: Candace Person at Candace.Person@mail.house.gov 

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Marking 60 Years Since “La Revolución de Abril,” Rep. Adriano Espaillat to Reintroduce Historic Legislation Named in Spanish

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Adriano Espaillat (NY-13)

    NEW YORK, NY –  Representative Adriano Espaillat (NY-13) will reintroduce his bill later this month urging the creation of a commission to study interventions and occupations of the United States and develop proposals for the repair and reconciliation to the people of the Dominican Republic and other Latin American and Caribbean countries as these misguided interventions led to generations of turmoil and civil conflict.

    During the 20th century, the U.S. conducted a series of military interventions and operations in Latin America and the Caribbean, contributing to great harms in numerous countries, including coups, regime collapses, civil wars, and mass casualties. In the decades since these historical occupations occurred, the U.S. has gained a clearer picture of how these misguided military operations have negatively impacted the collective psyche of Caribbean and Latin American countries and spurred anti-U.S. sentiment amongst our neighbors. Studies also show these military operations have resulted in generational trauma and mass migration into the U.S. Fortunately, this new bill provides the U.S. with an important opportunity to formally apologize for these missteps in the region.

    The Commission on the United States Occupations in the Americas Act will establish a Commission responsible for studying and identifying the lasting effects of the United States’ 20th century military occupations in Latin America and the Caribbean. The Commission would also provide recommendations on whether a formal U.S. apology to each previously occupied nation is warranted, in addition to considering any potential remedies for wrongs and injuries caused by the U.S. during the following occupations:

    1. First Occupation of Nicaragua (1909 – 1925)
    2. First Occupation of Mexico (1914)
    3. Second Occupation of Mexico (1916 – 1917)
    4. First Occupation of the Dominican Republic (1916 – 1924)
    5. Second Occupation of Nicaragua (1927- 1933)
    6. Guatemala Air Occupation (1954)
    7. Second Occupation of the Dominican Republic (1965- 1966)
    8. Grenada Occupation (1983)
    9. Panama Occupation (1989)
    10. Any other unlawful occupations in the region identified by the Commission. 

    Only by directly confronting the United States’ difficult history in this region, and apologizing for our missteps, can our nation work towards repairing our relationship with the many Latin American and Caribbean nations we have harmed and pursue future policy solutions that uplift our region and make up for our historical wrongdoings.

    ###

    Representative Espaillat is the first Dominican American to serve in the U.S. House of Representatives and his congressional district includes Harlem, East Harlem, West Harlem, Hamilton Heights, Washington Heights, Inwood, Marble Hill and the north-west Bronx. First elected to Congress in 2016, Representative Espaillat is serving his fifth term in Congress. Representative Espaillat currently serves as a member of the influential U.S. House Committee on Appropriations responsible for funding the federal government’s vital activities and serves as Ranking Member of the Legislative Branch Subcommittee of the committee during the 119th Congress. He is Chairman of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus (CHC), a member of the Congressional Progressive Caucus (CPC), and serves as a Senior Whip of the Democratic Caucus. To find out more about Rep. Espaillat, visit online at https://espaillat.house.gov/. 

    Media inquiries: Candace Person at Candace.Person@mail.house.gov 

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Representatives Espaillat, Ocasio-Cortez Statement on ICE Abduction of Bronx Resident Merwil Gutiérrez

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Adriano Espaillat (NY-13)

    BRONX, NY – Today, Representatives Adriano Espaillat (NY-13) and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (NY-14) released a joint statement on Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s (ICE) abduction of Bronx resident Merwil Gutiérrez.

    On February 24, ICE detained 19-year-old Merwil Gutiérrez at the doorstep in front of his shared Bronx apartment. He had no criminal record or tattoos linking him to the Tren de Aragua gang. He was denied due process.

    “We are horrified by ICE’s abduction of Merwil Gutiérrez, who was violently taken from his doorstop in the Bronx and deported to El Salvador. Like many others sent to CECOT, a mega-prison infamous for human rights abuses, Merwil was torn away from his father and our community, without due process, without any criminal charges, and without an order of deportation from a judge. His family is heartbroken and thinks he was deported by mistake. Whether Kilmar Abrego García or Merwil Gutiérrez, ICE’s attacks on due process are threats to all of our fundamental rights. Our offices have been in touch with the family to support and we will not rest until Merwil is back where he belongs: at home in the Bronx.”

    ###

    Representative Espaillat is the first Dominican American to serve in the U.S. House of Representatives and his congressional district includes Harlem, East Harlem, West Harlem, Hamilton Heights, Washington Heights, Inwood, Marble Hill and the north-west Bronx. First elected to Congress in 2016, Representative Espaillat is serving his fifth term in Congress. Representative Espaillat currently serves as a member of the influential U.S. House Committee on Appropriations responsible for funding the federal government’s vital activities and serves as Ranking Member of the Legislative Branch Subcommittee of the committee during the 119th Congress. He is Chairman of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus (CHC), a member of the Congressional Progressive Caucus (CPC), and serves as a Senior Whip of the Democratic Caucus. To find out more about Rep. Espaillat, visit online at https://espaillat.house.gov/.

    Media inquiries: Candace Person at Candace.Person@mail.house.gov 

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI China: Xi says China, Russia find right path of state-to-state interactions between neighboring major countries

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    Xi says China, Russia find right path of state-to-state interactions between neighboring major countries

    Chinese President Xi Jinping inspects the guard of honor during a grand welcome ceremony at the Vnukovo Airport in Moscow, Russia, May 7, 2025. Xi arrived here on Wednesday to pay a state visit to Russia and attend the celebrations marking the 80th anniversary of the Victory in the Soviet Union’s Great Patriotic War at the invitation of Russian President Vladimir Putin. [Photo/Xinhua]

    MOSCOW, May 7 — Chinese President Xi Jinping said here Wednesday that China and Russia have found a right path of state-to-state interactions between neighboring major countries.

    He made the remarks in a written statement upon his arrival in Moscow for a state visit to the country and attendance at the celebrations marking the 80th anniversary of the victory in the Soviet Union’s Great Patriotic War.

    Xi noted that the two sides, as good neighbors that cannot be moved away, true friends who share weal and woe, and good partners of mutual achievement, have forged a spirit of strategic coordination for a new era, which features permanent good-neighborly friendship, comprehensive strategic coordination and mutually beneficial cooperation.

    The independent, mature and resilient bilateral relationship, Xi said, not only brings great benefits to the two peoples, but also makes important contributions to maintaining global strategic stability and promoting an equal and orderly multipolar world.

    This year marks the 80th anniversary of the victory in the World Anti-Fascist War and the 80th anniversary of the founding of the United Nations, he noted.

    China and Russia, both major countries of the world and permanent members of the UN Security Council, will join hands to safeguard the victorious outcome of World War II, firmly safeguard the UN-centered international system and the international order underpinned by international law, resolutely oppose hegemonism and power politics, practice true multilateralism, and promote the building of a more just and equitable global governance system, Xi said.

    The Chinese president also said that during the visit he will have in-depth communication with Russian President Vladimir Putin on bilateral relations, practical cooperation as well as major international and regional issues of common concern, which will inject strong impetus into the development of the China-Russia comprehensive strategic partnership of coordination for a new era.

    Noting that he will attend Russia’s May 9th Victory Day celebrations again after a decade, Xi said he looks forward to working with leaders of other countries and the Russian people to deeply commemorate the martyrs who heroically sacrificed their lives for the victory in the World Anti-Fascist War, and send out a strong voice of the times to safeguard international fairness and justice.

    Xi’s plane was escorted by Russian Air Force aircraft after it entered the country’s airspace.

    When Xi arrived at the Vnukovo Airport in Moscow, he was warmly welcomed by Russian Deputy Prime Minister Tatyana Golikova and other senior government officials.

    Chinese President Xi Jinping is warmly welcomed by Russian Deputy Prime Minister Tatyana Golikova and other senior government officials at the Vnukovo Airport in Moscow, Russia, May 7, 2025. Xi arrived here on Wednesday to pay a state visit to Russia and attend the celebrations marking the 80th anniversary of the Victory in the Soviet Union’s Great Patriotic War at the invitation of Russian President Vladimir Putin. [Photo/Xinhua]
    Chinese President Xi Jinping arrives in Moscow, Russia, May 7, 2025. Xi arrived here on Wednesday to pay a state visit to Russia and attend the celebrations marking the 80th anniversary of the Victory in the Soviet Union’s Great Patriotic War. [Photo/Xinhua]
    Chinese President Xi Jinping arrives in Moscow, Russia, May 7, 2025. Xi arrived here on Wednesday to pay a state visit to Russia and attend the celebrations marking the 80th anniversary of the Victory in the Soviet Union’s Great Patriotic War. [Photo/Xinhua]
    Chinese President Xi Jinping arrives in Moscow, Russia, May 7, 2025. Xi arrived here on Wednesday to pay a state visit to Russia and attend the celebrations marking the 80th anniversary of the Victory in the Soviet Union’s Great Patriotic War. [Photo/Xinhua]
    Members of an honor guard line up at the airport in Moscow, Russia, May 7, 2025. Chinese President Xi Jinping arrived here on Wednesday to pay a state visit to Russia and attend the celebrations marking the 80th anniversary of the Victory in the Soviet Union’s Great Patriotic War. [Photo/Xinhua]
    Members of a military band are pictured at the airport in Moscow, Russia, May 7, 2025. Chinese President Xi Jinping arrived here on Wednesday to pay a state visit to Russia and attend the celebrations marking the 80th anniversary of the Victory in the Soviet Union’s Great Patriotic War. [Photo/Xinhua]
    Chinese President Xi Jinping arrives in Moscow, Russia, May 7, 2025. Xi arrived here on Wednesday to pay a state visit to Russia and attend the celebrations marking the 80th anniversary of the Victory in the Soviet Union’s Great Patriotic War. [Photo/Xinhua]
    Members of an honor guard are pictured at the airport in Moscow, Russia, May 7, 2025. Chinese President Xi Jinping arrived here on Wednesday to pay a state visit to Russia and attend the celebrations marking the 80th anniversary of the Victory in the Soviet Union’s Great Patriotic War. [Photo/Xinhua]
    Chinese President Xi Jinping arrives in Moscow, Russia, May 7, 2025. Xi arrived here on Wednesday to pay a state visit to Russia and attend the celebrations marking the 80th anniversary of the Victory in the Soviet Union’s Great Patriotic War. [Photo/Xinhua]

    MIL OSI China News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Senators Coons, Curtis introduce bipartisan legislation to help small businesses bring new technologies to market

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Delaware Christopher Coons
    WASHINGTON – U.S. Senators Chris Coons (D-Del.) and John Curtis (R-Utah) today introduced legislation that would help innovative small businesses commercialize their technologies. The Research Advancing to Market Production (RAMP) for Innovators Act updates the SBIR/STTR programs—often called “America’s seed fund”—to turn more technological research into market-ready products.  
    A companion bill was also introduced today in the House by Representatives Chrissy Houlahan (D-Pa.) and Troy Balderson (R-Ohio). 
    “Innovative small businesses in Delaware and across the country drive our economy further, and we need to cut red tape so that it’s easier for these businesses bring their ideas to customers faster and profit off their research,” said Senator Coons. “The bipartisan RAMP for Innovators Act makes it easier for small businesses conducting government-funded research to more easily commercialize their work, ensuring these grants will strengthen our economy for years to come.” 
    “Utah’s small businesses are the backbone of our state’s economy, representing over 99% of all companies,” said Senator Curtis. “To sustain our economic strength and preserve Utah’s exceptional quality of life, it’s crucial that we empower these businesses to succeed. By improving programs that foster innovation and commercialization, our bipartisan legislation helps entrepreneurs develop new technologies and bring them to market—strengthening our economy and our competitiveness on the world stage.”
    “As an entrepreneur myself, I know the difficulties that small businesses in our Commonwealth and country face in scaling their operations and getting their products to the shelves,” said Representative Houlahan. “Federal programs that support our small businesses need to be both more efficient and more effective in order to make the American dream a reality for small business owners. The RAMP for Innovators Act provides entrepreneurs with streamlined access to the resources, intellectual property protections, and capital they need to scale, compete, and succeed. I’m proud to lead this bipartisan, bicameral legislation to ensure that more of the amazing, innovative technologies developed by American entrepreneurs become a reality, helping our nation maintain its competitive edge.”
    “America’s strength has always come from our ability to foster innovation and empower those willing to take risks,” said Representative Balderson. “The RAMP for Innovators Act ensures that our tech entrepreneurs have the tools they need to grow, compete globally, and transform bold ideas into real products, good-paying jobs, and lasting economic growth in places like Central Ohio and across the country.”
    The RAMP for Innovators Act builds on the success of two competitive programs for developing small business innovation: the Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) and the Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) programs. Currently, federal agencies use these programs to award grants and contracts to small businesses across the country for high-tech research that helps solve Washington’s research and development needs. However, various roadblocks and administrative delays make it hard for these businesses to turn their research into commercial products. The RAMP for Innovators Act cuts red tape around the SBIR/STTR programs to help more of these innovative businesses make money off their ideas on the open market.
    Specifically, the legislation would:
    Streamline and accelerate the SBIR/STTR application and award process
    Provide agencies a fast-track option for making awards to promising small businesses
    Designate a Technology Commercialization Officer at each agency with an SBIR/STTR program
    Provide awardees with robust and flexible technical assistance
    Provide awardees with access to I-Corps training to help bring their technologies to market
    Increase clarity on SBIR/STTR commercialization performance by requiring a metrics-based assessment
    Establish a fast-track patent examination process for awardees
    Senator Coons has long championed small businesses and entrepreneurs up and down Delaware and across the country. Last week, he introduced the bipartisan Made in America Manufacturing Finance Act with Senator Joni Ernst (R-Iowa) to reshape the financial landscape for small businesses. 
    This bill has been endorsed by the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation (ITIF), the University City Science Center, BPC Action, and the Delaware Small Business Development Center.
    “ITIF supports RAMP for Innovators, the Research Advancing to Market Production for Innovators Act, which will further bolster the commercialization potential of SBIR/STTR programs through improvements such as making commercialization potential a stronger consideration in project selection, clarifying that all awardees may use a share of Phase I and II funds for commercially oriented activities, and supporting the ability of innovators to secure intellectual property rights underpinning their inventions through stronger linkages with the PTO,” said Dr. Rob Atkinson, President of ITIF.
    “The University City Science Center heartily endorses the Research Advancing to Market Production for Innovators Act introduced by Senators Coons and Curtis and Representatives Houlahan and Balderson. This legislation would codify language that has already been signed into law to ensure that commercialization is central to the goals of SBIR and STTR. The RAMP for Innovators Act fulfills the mission of the 2016 SBIR/STTR recommendations from the National Advisory Council on Innovation and Entrepreneurship (NACIE) at the Department of Commerce. I was honored to serve as a member of NACIE during this time and believe these recommendations are necessary to fulfill our commercialization needs in this country,” said Tiffany Wilson, CEO of the University City Science Center.
    “American innovation is the foundation upon which U.S. economic competitiveness is built. Commercializing more new technologies helps the United States strengthen its edge over our competitors and ensures taxpayers get a good return on their investment in research and development. BPC Action applauds Senators Coons and Curtis, and Representatives Houlahan and Balderson, for their bipartisan leadership in reintroducing the RAMP for Innovators Act,” said Michele Stockwell, President of BPC Action.
    “Delaware SBDC is pleased to endorse the new SBIR Commercialization Bill, the Research Advancing to Market Production for Innovators Act. There are significant improvements to help entrepreneurs move innovation to commercialization,” said Mike Bowman, Director of Delaware Small Business Development Center. 
    Senators Coons and Curtis are members of the Senate Small Business and Entrepreneurship Committee.  
    You can read the one-pager here.
    You can read the full text of the bill here.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Application Period Open for Service Academy Nominations for Class of 2030

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Representative Lauren Boebert (Colorado, 3)

    EATON, CO—The Office of Congresswoman Lauren Boebert (CO-04) has officially opened the application process for Class of 2030 nominations to a U.S. Service Academy.

    “Last year I had the privilege of nominating 12 of the Third District’s best and brightest to the U.S. Service Academies,” stated Congresswoman Boebert. “These patriotic young men and women who care deeply about the future of America and public service have committed to serving at least five years in the military following graduation. I look forward to the selection process this year and can’t wait to meet our district’s applicants who are willing to serve our great country!”

    Background:

    If you are a high school student interested in serving our country by attending a military academy, or if you know of a high school student who might be interested, the Service Academy Nomination application is now open for the Class of 2030. The Fall 2025 deadline for applications is September 12, 2025. 

    Interested applicants should review information posted on the Service Academy Nomination website prior to applying.

    Members of Congress are able to nominate candidates for appointment to four of the five U.S. Service Academies: U.S. Military Academy (USMA), West Point, NY; the U.S. Naval Academy (USNA), Annapolis, MD; the U.S. Air Force Academy (USAFA), Colorado Springs, CO; and the U.S. Merchant Marine Academy (USMMA), Kings Point, NY. The fifth service academy, the U.S. Coast Guard Academy (USCGA), New London, CT, does not require a congressional nomination for appointment.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Security: Former Morton, Washington City Clerk pleads guilty to wire fraud for lengthy embezzlement scheme

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

    Tacoma – The former Clerk-Treasurer for the City of Morton in Lewis County pleaded guilty today in U.S. District Court in Tacoma to wire fraud in connection with her nine-year scheme to steal nearly $1 million from city coffers, announced Acting U.S. Attorney Teal Luthy Miller. Tamara (Tammy) Clevenger served as the Clerk-Treasurer for Morton from 2012-2022. In 2024, an audit by the Washington State Auditor uncovered years of embezzlement totaling $937,584. Clevenger is scheduled to be sentenced by U.S. District Judge Tiffany M. Cartwright on July 7, 2025.

    According to records filed in the case, including the plea agreement, Clevenger used a variety of ways to steal funds. Between November 2015 and December 2021, she stole at least $311,727 of cash that citizens had brought in to pay for city services. In some instances, she would write a fraudulent city checks in the amount of cash she stole to conceal the theft of the cash. She also made unauthorized cash withdrawals with the Morton ATM card.

    Between February 2013 and December 2021, Clevenger stole at least $625,857 by writing city checks to herself and depositing them in her bank account. Clevenger would use checks that had been pre-signed by the mayor for use in emergency situations. Clevenger used fake vendor invoices to make it appear the checks had been written for a service rendered to the city. Clevenger’s actions used interstate wires to commit the fraud with the transfer of funds between various bank accounts. One example is the transfer of $5,808 in funds from Washington to Umpqua bank servers located outside the state.

    Following the audit, the City of Morton established new procedures so that no single person had control of the various banking functions.

    Clevenger has agreed to make restitution to the City of Morton. She is receiving credit for some $8,626 that she deposited to city accounts via ATM machines.

    The FBI and IRS worked with the Washington State Auditor’s Office on the criminal financial investigation.

    Wire fraud is punishable by up to twenty years in prison. Prosecutors have agreed to recommend a three-year prison term. Judge Cartwright is not bound by the recommendation and can impose any sentence allowed by law, after considering the sentencing guidelines and other statutory factors.

    The case is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Amanda McDowell

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Speech at the AML Summit 2025

    Source: NZ Music Month takes to the streets

    Good morning and a warm welcome to everyone, it’s a pleasure to be here.

    Let me start by thanking AML Solutions for giving me the opportunity to speak on the 10th anniversary of the AML Summit. 

    I know you have a busy and interesting schedule to look forward to over the next couple of days.  This year’s conference theme is aptly named “The evolution of Risk”.  I understand that the presentations will focus on supporting reporting entities to understand what best-practice compliance looks like under a reformed risk-based and flexible AML/CFT system. 

    This theme is future-focused – and touches on issues I have spent a lot of time thinking about and planning for since becoming responsible for the AML/CFT portfolio in my role as Associate Minister of Justice. 

    You will likely know that last year Cabinet approved my plans for an AML/CFT reform programme.  The objectives of legislative reform are to meet the objectives this government committed to in our coalition agreement: and that is to tackle organised crime and cut red tape.

    How can New Zealand reform AML/CFT regulation to reduce burden on industry and support a common-sense approach to compliance; while still ensuring we are well placed to tackle organised crime and protect our international reputation as a trusted place to do business? 

    How do we equip ourselves to deal with new and emerging challenges and threats in this space?  How can we harness new technologies to help us fight crime more effectively and make it easier and cheaper for businesses to defend themselves against money laundering? 

    How will we ensure that we, as a country, are doing our part in this inherently global fight – in a fractious world where the nexus of organised crime and international conflicts is growing? 

    Over the last year I have taken advice and considered many of the challenges facing the sector in detail.  Many of you in this room, or online, will have been involved in and contributed to this advice.  I am so grateful for your hard work and specialist contributions.  Your expertise is invaluable – it enables robust discussion and informed decision-making. 

    Now is the time to deliver on our coalition commitments.  The Act has now been in force for 11 years and we know the current system is not delivering as well as it could for New Zealanders, businesses, or for law enforcement. 

    This is because the laws and requirements are highly complex and not sufficiently risk based.  As a result, they can be repetitive and unnecessarily burdensome.  I have heard from many New Zealanders that the requirements are confusing, obstructive, and costly.

    Some of the examples they have given me illustrate how absurd these requirements can be. I ’ve heard from mothers who’ve told me they cannot open bank accounts for their child unless they are able to prove where their child lives. I’ve heard from elderly widows, who had relied on their husbands to take care of bills and are now unable to have a bank account in their own name because they have no written proof to say they live in their own home.  These are clear indications of how the system is failing to take a properly risk-based approach.

    Multiple reviews of the current system have also identified deficiencies that make it harder for the system to effectively deter and combat the criminal activity that we know is taking place in New Zealand. 

    At New Zealand’s latest mutual evaluation, the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) reported on several strengths in the New Zealand system but also highlighted that there is room for significant improvement. 

    I know you will be aware that compliance with international standards is incredibly important for New Zealand’s global reputation and financial standing.  We know that FATF recommendations are now tougher, and that there are still many actions from our last evaluation that we need to address.  Regulatory reform is needed to ensure we do well at our next evaluation. 

    But let’s not belabour what we already know about the deficiencies. Let’s instead focus on opportunities for the future and what we can achieve through this reform programme.  To me, reform presents a great opportunity to enhance the strengths of our system, and to address identified concerns. 

    We know, for example, that the wider Financial Crime Group do excellent work, especially relating to asset recovery.  We only need to cast our eyes to very recent news stories – I’m thinking of the announcement last September of the highly successful operation against the Comanchero gang which saw $5.8 million worth of assets restrained – to know law enforcement across the system is working hard and achieving remarkable successes through their work.  A look at the latest Police annual report shows that over $72 million of assets were restrained from organised and financial crime, and 379 money laundering investigations resulted in prosecution.

    We also know there is sound domestic cooperation and coordination on monitoring possible terrorist financing – the FATF told us so, at our latest mutual evaluation. 

    The FATF have also noted that we are known internationally for our high-quality responsiveness to cooperation requests. 

    In other words, New Zealand already does lots of things well.  Our focus is therefore on improving the AML/CFT system to enhance these strengths.  Let’s enable the system and its actors to achieve the intended outcomes: to detect and deter money laundering and terrorism financing.

    This Government is about quality regulation.  We want regulation that achieves intended outcomes, regulation that makes sense and is workable for all.  This means getting rid of unnecessary red-tape– if regulation isn’t providing the results we are after, there is no point to it. 

    In the case of the AML/CFT system, regulation needs to contribute to the fundamental purpose of the system: tackling crime.  To do that effectively, we need an agile, streamlined system that is laser focussed on real risk. 

    A truly risk-based system will better enable law enforcement to crack down on organised crime by providing the financial intelligence needed to go after criminal organisations.  A truly risk-based system is more aligned with international obligations and standards.  A truly risk-based system will provide regulatory relief for lower risk businesses and the public.

    My reform programme, therefore, will be undertaken in three parts.  The first phase is already well-advanced and will deliver immediate regulatory relief via two bills – the first, the Statutes Amendment Bill, has already been reported back from Select Committee to the House of Representatives, and is likely to come into effect in the coming months.  The second, the Anti-Money Laundering and Countering Terrorism Financing Amendment Bill, is currently before select committee. 

    The changes made through these bills include removing both address verification requirements for many customers, and relaxing enhanced customer due diligence requirements for lower-risk trusts.  This will help make it easier for mums and dads to set up bank accounts for their kids, and easier for vulnerable kiwis – including the elderly – to get access to essential financial services. 

    This first set of reforms aims to make immediate changes, to make the AML/CFT system more risk-based and ease the regulatory burden on businesses.

    These changes alone already represent the most significant regulatory relief in the history of the AML/CFT regime.  But we do not intend to stop there.

    The second phase of changes focuses on structural reforms for the regime. Cabinet has agreed that, as part of these structural reforms, we will be implementing a single AML/CFT supervisor structure within the Department of Internal Affairs.  This will replace the current three-supervisor model. 

    This move will create a more efficient, effective, and risk-based supervisory structure – one that reduces unnecessary compliance costs for lower-risk businesses and transactions, removes the need for multi-supervisor coordination efforts – thereby reducing costs – and streamlines decision-making.

    A single supervisor can be more resource responsive to the ever-changing risk environment.  A single supervisor will be better able to deliver consistent and timely guidance to support reporting entities. 

    This will help to ensure that businesses have the confidence to take a more flexible approach to implementing their AML/CFT obligations and lower the barrier to accessing financial services for low-risk customers. 

    A single supervisor with overview of the wider AML/CFT environment will also be better able to look for and realise opportunities as they arise.  For example, I’m sure we all agree that there are opportunities and benefits to be gained in the digital identity and open banking areas.  In addition, the emergence of AI could herald improved, and more cost effective, electronic Know Your Customer (eKYC) functions, risk assessments, and suspicious activity reporting.

    Everyone here will be aware that in a world of increasing demands, the AML/CFT system in New Zealand is currently underfunded.  My phase two structural reforms will also see us work towards introducing a sustainable funding model for the system. 

    The new hybrid funding model will establish an industry-levy.  I will ensure that this levy is designed in a way that distributes the costs in a risk appropriate and equitable way, so that it targets the highest risk sectors – such as large international banks – and does not place an undue burden on small businesses. 

    This hybrid funding model will provide sufficient resourcing for core regulatory functions and deliver substantial savings to the Crown.  This approach is in line with what has been done in other like-minded jurisdictions, like Australia, the United Kingdom and Canada.

    As part of the work on the funding model, a work programme and a National Strategy will be developed in partnership with industry and agreed by Cabinet to ensure that the system is focussed on industry priorities.  Any changes to the levy will also need to be informed by the AML/CFT National Strategy. 

    Now, I know that many of you in this room will have opinions and views on the approach we have taken to these structural reforms.  I look forward to engaging with you and drawing on your sector expertise as we get stuck into the detail of this change process.

    The structural changes in phase two of my reforms will result in an amendment Bill that I aim to have introduced by the middle of this year.  Officials are currently working on the details of developing and implementing the levy, but I expect that the earliest it would be in place is by 2027.

    The third phase of these reforms will deliver wider legislative changes to implement international standards outlined by the FATF.  This Bill will be introduced later in this Parliamentary term.

    Doing this international compliance work will have a natural flow on effect that improves New Zealand entities’ ability to carry on with business and sharpens our law enforcement tools.  Importantly, it includes amendments to provide further flexibility for businesses to take a more risk-based approach to their AML/CFT obligations.

    The work programme was designed to address specific areas that were identified through robust stakeholder consultation during the 2022 Statutory Review of the AML/CFT Act and further targeted engagement has been undertaken since then.

    I am aware there is room for improvement in other areas as well – and some of you may be disappointed that more statutory reforms are not currently being progressed. 

    In arriving at my current statutory reform programme, I have taken a pragmatic approach – the current fiscal environment dictates that we are smart and outcomes-focused with our reforms.  Right now, this means prioritising the changes that will give us the biggest bang for our buck in terms of regulatory relief, while ensuring compliance with international expectations and supporting law enforcement to tackle organised crime and delivering regulatory relief. 

    We need to prioritise this legislative work programme first to ensure that changes to the law are made and the system is properly set up to take a risk-based approach in time for our next mutual evaluation in 2028.  I am excited and proud that this reform programme is on track to deliver the most significant regulatory relief since the Act came into force in 2013.

    But, like you, I want to do more, if I can.  I am committed to look for opportunities to do just that, not only through reforms to legislation, but also through considering potential exemptions and regulations that will support a more risk-based AML/CFT system.

    I look forward to working with you all as we move forward with all the parts of this reform programme.  To me, the key to successfully strengthening the AML/CFT system through these reforms is collaboration and leveraging expertise in the sector. 

    I encourage you all to participate in consultation when these opportunities come up.  We need people with experience and knowledge to get involved – we need you.  I look forward to hearing your views on how we can make the laws work for you. 

    Thank you for having me today, it’s a pleasure to be here with you all.  Enjoy your time here at the conference.

    MIL OSI New Zealand News