NewzIntel.com

Category: Russian Federation

  • MIL-OSI USA: Appropriations Committee Approves Chairman Fleischmann’s FY26 Energy and Water Bill

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Chuck Fleischmann (R-TN)

    Washington, DC – The House Appropriations Committee met to consider the Fiscal Year 2026 Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, led by Energy and Water Appropriations Chairman Chuck Fleischmann (TN-03). The bill was approved by the Committee with a vote of 35 to 27. Approval of Rep. Fleischmann’s FY26 Energy and Water Appropriations bill by the Appropriations Committee is a key step before the bill can be brought to the House Floor for a vote.

    Energy and Water Chairman Chuck Fleischmann said, “To achieve America’s new Golden Age, we must safeguard our national security, unleash American energy dominance, and increase economic prosperity for all our citizens. I am proud that, in tight fiscal times where every dollar spent must be scrutinized, the Fiscal Year 2026 Energy and Water Development appropriations bill makes historic investments in our national security and nuclear deterrent, advances American leadership in deploying new nuclear technologies, provides robust funding for waterways infrastructure projects nationwide, reduces our reliance on foreign sources of critical minerals, unleashes American energy production, and stops wasteful, inflationary spending. This bill is the product of close collaboration with the Trump Administration and my colleagues on the Appropriations Committee, and I thank them for their strong support.”

    House Committee on Appropriations Chairman Tom Cole (OK-04) said, “This FY26 Energy and Water bill is focused on lowering energy costs and advancing affordable, reliable, and secure power for the nation. It recognizes that American energy dominance is essential to our economic strength, national security, and global leadership—fueling jobs, innovation, and resilience across every community. Further, we make clear to our adversaries that America will lead with strength built on domestic energy and critical mineral production. We also prioritize essential waterway, flood control, and ports and harbors projects. Chairman Fleischmann’s approach ensures a stronger future reinforced through cutting-edge technology, strategic use of abundant resources, and responsible stewardship of taxpayer dollars, and I commend its full committee approval.”

    Energy and Water Subcommittee Chairman Fleischmann’s opening remarks are available here.
    Chairman Cole’s opening remarks are available here.

    Fiscal Year 2026 Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Bill
    The Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Bill provides a total discretionary allocation of $57.300 billion, which is $766.4 million below the Fiscal Year 2025 enacted level. The defense portion of the allocation is $33.223 billion, and the non-defense portion of the allocation is $24.077 billion.

    The bill prioritizes funding for agencies and programs that safeguard U.S. national security, unleash American energy dominance, and advance economic competitiveness.

    Key Takeaways

    Champions America’s nuclear deterrent and strengthens national security by: 

    • Providing $20.662 billion for the continued modernization of the nuclear weapons stockpile and infrastructure.
    • Providing $2.171 billion to support the U.S. Navy’s nuclear fleet by investing in infrastructure and new technologies to maintain America’s advantage over our adversaries.
    • Providing $1.984 billion to reduce the danger of hostile nations or terrorist groups acquiring nuclear weapons.
    • Prohibiting the sale of crude oil from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve to the Chinese Communist Party.
    • Prohibiting access to U.S. nuclear weapons production facilities by citizens of China and Russia.
    • Prohibiting the Department of Energy from providing financial assistance to any foreign entity of concern.
    • Prohibiting the purchase of technology and telecommunications equipment from China and other adversaries.

    Supports the Trump Administration and mandate of the American people by: 

    • Codifying President Trump’s executive actions by prohibiting funding for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion and Critical Race Theory programs and ending federal censorship of free speech.
    • Continuing the prohibition on funding for any discriminatory action against individuals advocating for traditional marriage.
    • Allowing for the lawful carry of firearms on Corps of Engineers land.

    Restores American energy dominance and bolsters the national economy by: 

    • Supporting one of the largest investments focused on mining production technologies for critical minerals extraction in decades, reducing reliance on foreign sources.
    • Robustly funding small modular reactor and advanced reactor demonstration projects, as well as increasing funding for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to expand capacity for the review, licensing, and oversight of new nuclear reactors.
      • These investments are key to regaining international dominance in the nuclear market and achieving the Trump Administration’s goal to expand nuclear energy capacity to 400 gigawatts by 2050.
    • Facilitating the efficient transport of goods and commodities through improvements and maintenance of America’s ports and waterways.
    • Increasing investments to develop new baseload geothermal energy sources to capitalize on our vast domestic resources.
    • Maintaining funding for cybersecurity efforts that enable a resilient, reliable, and secure electric grid.

    Safeguards American taxpayer dollars and preserves core functions by: 

    • Eliminating the Biden-era Office of Clean Energy Demonstrations.
    • Including no funds for the Department of Energy Office of Energy Justice and Equity.
    • Refocusing applied energy technology program funding to ensure taxpayer resources are directed to the highest priority research and development efforts.
    • Reducing global dependency on the U.S. for foreign nuclear reactor conversions.

    During the markup, Committee Republicans also stood with the America First agenda and rejected Democrat amendments that would have: 

    • Restricted the implementation of the America First agenda.
    • Repealed reconciliation efforts that reformed green new scam climate initiatives.
    • Sought to hamper enforcement efforts at Alligator Alcatraz.
    • Promoted and advanced critical race theory.
    • Allowed unapproved flags to be flown over federal facilities.
    • Funded polarizing diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives.
    • Exposed Americans to religious discrimination.
    • Prohibited the implementation of certain President Trump executive orders.
    • Increased taxpayer spending to unnecessary levels for certain programs.

    Adopted Amendments 

    • Fleischmann #1 (Manager’s Amendment) – Makes technical, bipartisan changes to the bill and report.
      • The amendment was adopted by voice vote.
    • Clyde #1 – Addresses the collection and utilization of recreation fees.
      • The amendment was adopted by voice vote.
    • Moore #2 – Increases funding for Regional Commissions.
      • The amendment was adopted by voice vote. 

    Bill text, before adoption of amendments, is available here.
    Bill report, before adoption of amendments, is available here.
    A table of included Community Project Funding requests is available here.

    ###

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI China: China claim team gold in artistic swimming at World Aquatics Championships

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    Wearing golden headbands symbolizing the legendary Monkey King, China’s artistic swimmers brought the myth to life in a powerful Wukong-inspired routine to win gold in the team technical event at the 2025 World Aquatics Championships on Tuesday.

    Their performance, based on the popular Chinese video game Black Myth: Wukong, earned China 307.8001 points – edging out longtime rivals Russia, competing under the name Neutral Athletes B (NAB), who finished second with 300.6183 points. Spain took third with 294.8575.

    Team China perform during the team technical final of artistic swimming at the World Aquatics Championships in Singapore, July 22, 2025. (Photo by Then Chih Wey/Xinhua)

    “This is a very special day,” said head coach Zhang Xiaohuan. “It’s the first time the Chinese artistic swimming team has been able to directly compete against our biggest rivals on a stage like this. It’s a moment we’ve waited a long time for.”

    “This gold medal doesn’t feel any less important than the one we won at the Olympic Games in Paris,” she added. “Our swimmers performed very well today. They improved on the areas that needed work after the preliminary round, and with that, they earned this title.”

    China won both the duet and team titles at the 2024 Paris Games, where Russian athletes did not participate.

    “I think they are still a very admirable opponent,” Zhang said. “They give us strong motivation to keep improving. We only narrowly won this time. We still have a long way to go.”

    Defeating NAB also gave the Chinese team a significant confidence boost.

    “We’ve waited a long time to compete against a team we’ve always wanted to measure ourselves against,” said team captain Feng Yu. “That makes this result even more special. It’s only when you face tough competition that you learn and improve.”

    The Wukong routine has been successful since its debut at the Artistic Swimming World Cup Super Final in Xi’an this June, where China also delivered a dominant performance. The coaching staff increased the difficulty level for the World Championships.

    “We raised the difficulty by almost two points,” Zhang said. “Most of that came from the leg movements. However, we didn’t extend the athletes’ breath-holding time. Instead, we incorporated more challenging movements at a faster tempo.”

    The runners-up were pleased with their silver medal.

    “We are very happy to be here at such a high-level competition,” said Anastasiia Bakhtyreva of NAB. “This is our first time competing at this level, and we feel a tremendous amount of emotion. We are very excited.”

    Earlier in the day, China’s Xu Huiyan won silver in the women’s solo free event, finishing behind Spain’s Iris Tio Casas. Just hours later, she returned to the pool for the team technical final.

    Xu made history in Singapore by winning China’s first-ever women’s solo technical gold medal at the World Championships. The 19-year-old now holds 19 gold medals across the World Cup, World Championships and World Junior Championships.

    “As a young athlete, Huiyan has progressed remarkably in just one year – from winning bronze in Doha to achieving what she has here in Singapore,” said Zhang. “Our rival in the solo free delivered an outstanding routine today.”

    The team technical gold marks China’s third gold in artistic swimming at the 2025 World Championships. 

    MIL OSI China News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Congressman Robert Aderholt Introduces Accelerate Revenue for Manufacturing and Sales (ARMS) Act

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Robert Aderholt (AL-04)

    WASHINGTON – Today, Reps. Robert Aderholt (R-AL), Jared Moskowitz (D-FL), Jimmy Panetta (D-CA), and Ryan Zinke (R-MT) introduced the Accelerate Revenue for Manufacturing and Sales (ARMS) Act, a bipartisan proposal to expedite the delivery of U.S.-made critical defense capabilities to allies and partners, by expanding the Special Defense Acquisition Fund (SDAF).

    “This bipartisan bill will help ensure that America’s allies and partners can receive critical defense equipment in a timely manner,” said Congressman Aderholt. “By strengthening the SDAF, this legislation not only supports national security interests abroad, but invests in our industrial defense base at home.”

    This bill addresses the inefficiencies and delays in the current Foreign Military Sales (FMS) process. The urgency to address these has increased in recent years, as the combined value of Foreign Military Sales (FMS) and Direct Commercial Sales (DCS) has significantly exceeded domestic defense procurement budgets, with international demand for U.S. defense products approaching two-to-one over domestic acquisition.
    “The ARMS Act is a win-win for our economic and national security, investing in both our critical manufacturing here at home and our allies’ defense abroad. As we continue to combat the threatening influence of foreign adversaries like Russia and China, this bill will help our allies stay safe while maintaining our leadership around the globe,” said Rep. Jared Moskowitz.

    “It’s unfortunate, but unnecessary and burdensome bureaucratic delays slow down the ability of the United States to fully support our democratic allies when they need it the most,” Rep. Jimmy Panetta added. “The expansion of the bipartisan Special Defense Acquisition Fund would provide a more efficient way to meet urgent demand and counter global threats, while strengthening our domestic manufacturing base.  As we push back against isolationism, this legislation is a smart, strategic, commonsense step to bolster American leadership and enhance global stability.”

    “I’ve made it my mission to eliminate the bureaucratic delays that prevent America’s life-saving defense capabilities from reaching our allies and partners. This bill delivers on that mission,” said Rep. Ryan Zinke. “The Special Defense Acquisition Fund is a vital but historically under-resourced tool that strengthens our defense industrial base and accelerates the delivery of critical arms and equipment to our allies. This legislation restores the SDAF to its original purpose supporting our partners and advancing American interests around the globe, without costing taxpayers a dime. I applaud Congressman Aderholt for his leadership in drafting this commonsense, strategic legislation.”

    The SDAF continues to have strong bipartisan support in Congress and from current and past Administrations.

    The Accelerate Revenue for Manufacturing and Sales Act is supported by leading defense organizations, including the Professional Services Counsel, National Defense Industrial Association, and Aerospace Industries Association.

    ###

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Congressman Crow Secures Key Wins in Annual Defense Bill for Colorado

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Jason Crow (CO-06)

    WASHINGTON — Congressman Jason Crow (CO-06), a former Army Ranger who serves on the House Armed Services Committee, announced today that more than 15 provisions he championed have been successfully included in the annual National Defense Authorization Act. Congressman Crow’s provisions focused on improving the lives of servicemembers and their families, modernizing our military to make America more safe, and investing in Colorado’s space industry to make us more competitive.

    “I served in combat and know the critical role Congress plays in improving the quality of life for servicemembers, strengthening our military readiness, and keeping Americans safe,” said Congressman Crow. “As a Member of the Armed Services Committee, I’ve worked in a bipartisan fashion to secure key wins for Colorado and support our men and women in uniform.”

    Congressman Crow’s provisions included in this year’s Pentagon budget include:

    Improving the Lives of our Servicemembers:

    • Upgrading Digital Health Technologies for Traumatic Brain Injury: Improves care for active-duty servicemembers suffering from a traumatic brain injury (TBI) by identifying ways that digital technology can be used to better deliver care.
    • Preventing Traumatic Brain Injuries in Fighter Pilots: Directs the Department of Defense to create a strategy to better identify, document, and treat TBIs in active duty pilots.
    • Providing Dental for Our Troops: Ensures no-cost dental care for all reservists, which will help recruiting, retention, and readiness.
    • Securing affordable health care for servicemembers: Ensures children’s hospitals that serve a large population of active duty families can continue providing high quality, affordable healthcare for servicemembers and their children.

    Investing in Colorado’s Space Industry & Making America More Competitive:

    • Bolstering Crucial Space Programs: Provides U.S. Space Systems Command with the resources needed to compete tactically and technologically with our adversaries in outer space.
    • Modernizing Rocket Launches: Requires the Space Force to report to Congress on how it will modernize standards and processes around rocket launches so they are safer and more efficient.
    • Supporting Space Domain Awareness: Improves our ability to track objects, like satellites, and activities happening outside of our atmosphere.
    • Increasing competition when the government buys space technology: Ensures that all companies have a fair shot when the U.S. government is looking to purchase technology that we use in space.

    Modernizing our Military:

    • Updating Air Force’s Flying Communications System: Authorizes support for mobile communications platforms to ensure continuity of government and national military command and control during a crisis
    • Protecting Assets Against Climate Change: Ensures climate shocks don’t negatively impact military installations, training, operations, and readiness.
    • Ensuring the Military Protects Civilians in Combat: Compels the Department of Defense to produce a report on how civilian harm could impact the success of military operations.
    • Improving the Defense Supply Chain: Encourages changes to the way DoD buys equipment so the supply chain that supports our defense is stronger and more efficient.
    • Strengthening the Afghanistan War Commission: Gives them more tools to complete their bipartisan assessment of key decisions made over twenty years of war in Afghanistan and to produce their final report.
    • Maintaining a global security footprint: Prevents the elimination or consolidation of US Southern Command.
    • Bolstering our strategy in Eastern Europe: Requires DoD to provide Congress an updated strategy related to NATO, and provide a detailed update on Russia’s actions. 

    ###

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Scott Votes Against GOP’S FY26 Defense Appropriations Bill

    Source: {United States House of Representatives – Congressman Bobby Scott (3rd District of Virginia)

    Headline: Scott Votes Against GOP’S FY26 Defense Appropriations Bill

    WASHINGTON, D.C. –Congressman Bobby Scott (VA-03) issued the following statement after voting against H.R. 4016, the Department of Defense Appropriations Act for FY 2026.

    “The annual defense appropriations bill must be a strong investment in our servicemembers and our national security. There are some provisions I support in this defense appropriations bill such as investments in shipbuilding, including funding the Columbia-class and Virginia-class submarines and the Gerald R. Ford Class Nuclear Aircraft Carrier program. The bill also includes an important amendment to prevent the closure of the United States Army Transportation Museum at Fort Eustis.

    “However, I ultimately cannot support the bill in its current form because the Republicans included language directing the Department of Defense to make harmful cuts in service of Elon Musk’s DOGE agenda. This bill will cut over $2 billion for troop readiness and $409 million for health programs. The bill includes provisions that attack the civil rights and liberties of service members and military families, including eliminating any office of diversity, equity, or inclusion. The bill also restricts access to abortion for servicemembers and fails to include $300 million for the Ukraine Security Assistance Initiative to help Ukraine defend itself against Russia’s invasion. 

    “I am hopeful that as the bill moves to the Senate, the final enacted version of this legislation will ensure our servicemembers and their families are protected and will also include necessary investments to our national security.”

    CLICK HERE for a fact sheet on the legislation.  

    # # #

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-Evening Report: ‘Maybe this is the last minutes you are living’: how the war is impacting young Ukrainians

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Ashley Humphrey, Lecturer in Social Sciences, Monash University

    Now into its fourth year, the war that followed Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has taken a devastating toll.

    An estimated 60,000 to 100,0000 Ukrainian lives have been lost and more than 10 million citizens displaced, and entire cities have been devastated.

    Daily life in Ukraine is disrupted by frequent power outages, significant interruptions to school and work routines and the recurrent warnings of air raid sirens.

    We sought to understand the war’s impact on young Ukrainians by interviewing those still in, and outside of Ukraine.

    Stolen youth

    Young adults (aged 18-35) tend to be in a transitional phase of life, working towards establishing a career, starting a family and making future plans.

    For many young Ukrainians, these developmental processes have been severely impeded during the war.

    Our work provides insights into how young Ukrainians have navigated the severe intrusion to their development, as well as how they have coped psychologically during this time.

    Our research drew on in-depth interviews with young Ukrainians who had lived in Ukraine for either the entirety or part of the war.

    Conducted both in person in Ukraine as well as online, these interviews looked specifically at how the ongoing war has affected young people’s employment or study situation, their aspirations for the future and mental health, while also seeking to understand what support they need.

    Responses from the participants varied.

    Those who were working were now exclusively engaged in work centred on assisting the war effort, including in some cases having joined the armed forces.

    Those who were studying had shifted to online mediums. The COVID pandemic ensured online learning platforms were largely already in place, allowing some to continue their studies from locations outside of Ukraine.

    While perhaps an alluring prospect to some, this flexibility while studying was also accompanied by chaos and disorientation, with short-term visas forcing young Ukrainians to move from one country to another.

    As one student explained:

    We went to Ukraine for two weeks and then we moved to Georgia for three months. Now we’re in Thailand for one month, and now we’re going to be in Australia for two or three months. Then we’re probably going to go to Japan for a year maybe.

    Local residents walk past buildings damaged as a result of a missile strike in Odesa.
    OLEKSANDR GIMANOV/AFP via Getty Images

    Depression, stress and surprising optimisim

    Despite enduring the horrors of the war, the participants generally spoke of their futures with admirable optimism.

    Remarkably, many commented on the way the war had redefined their goals toward helping their country in some way. One respondent told us:

    When you are starting a new project, when you are applying for a job, you are having a constant filter: how does this affect Ukraine? Am I helping Ukraine? Am I helping Ukraine enough? What else can I do?’

    Another shared:

    I know we are fighting for our future. And I want to be a part of Ukraine and be a part of its reconstruction. Because I am like this bright future – I am the youth that will be reconstructing Ukraine because of their knowledge and money and everything else.

    Unsurprisingly, some were also apathetic or dismissive of their futures, commenting on broken dreams and stating it was not a time for making future plans. They felt let down by the United Nations and the “international global order”.

    Participants commented on the ways the war has affected their mental health.

    Symptoms of PTSD, elevated stress, depression, constant anxiety as well as existential dread were raised, with one young Ukrainian telling us:

    Every time when I hear alerts […] you’re thinking, maybe this is the last minutes you are living because the bomb can strike your flat.

    The fear of loud noises, the harrowing plight of their country and the associated stress were emergent themes.

    Yet, some indicated they had become resilient to this stress:

    I think I became quite resistant to the stress as well, because I think I faced the scariest moments of my life, where I can die, and I understand that when you cannot control the situation and what’s going on, I cannot control whether a missile is going to be in my house.

    This notion of resilience was both surprising and inspiring and this finding corroborated with past studies on war-affected Ukrainians.

    As one participant explained:

    If there was no war, I wouldn’t be who I am right now. It has really changed me. It has given me strength, this optimistic outlook.

    A need for greater support

    There is much to learn from these inspiring young people. But more pressingly, they need help.

    As the relentless shelling of Ukrainian cities continues, the participants call for greater access to mental health and counselling services, ongoing investment in online learning tools and job opportunities and basic resources to support their wellbeing.

    The authors do not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and have disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    – ref. ‘Maybe this is the last minutes you are living’: how the war is impacting young Ukrainians – https://theconversation.com/maybe-this-is-the-last-minutes-you-are-living-how-the-war-is-impacting-young-ukrainians-260800

    MIL OSI Analysis – EveningReport.nz –

  • MIL-OSI USA: July 22nd, 2025 Heinrich Votes Against Republicans’ Legislation to Defund Public Broadcasting, Harm New Mexicans’ Safety

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for New Mexico Martin Heinrich
    WASHINGTON — U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.) stood firm for New Mexico families by voting against Senate Republicans’ rescissions package that cuts funding to local public radio and TV stations, which rural communities and Tribes rely on as their primary source of information during life-or-death emergencies like wildfires, flash floods, and other catastrophic natural disasters.
    “First, Republicans pushed through the largest Medicaid cut in American history. Now, they’ve slashed the only lifeline rural communities and Tribes rely on during life-or-death emergencies like wildfires and flash floods. Republicans’ cuts to local public radio and TV stations are reckless, dangerous, and put New Mexicans directly in harm’s way. All of this to bankroll massive tax giveaways for Trump’s billionaire donors,” said Heinrich, a member of the Senate Appropriations Committee.
    Below are the New Mexico radio and TV stations whose federal funding is now at risk thanks to Republicans’ rescissions bill:
    Radio
    KSHI-FM, Zuni
    KGLP-FM, Gallup
    KABR-FM, Alamo
    KSJE-FM, Farmington
    KENW-FM, Portales
    KCIE-FM, Dulce
    KTDB, Pine Hill
    KSFR-FM, Santa Fe
    KANW-FM, Albuquerque
    KHFM-FM (Albuquerque)
    KUNM-FM (Albuquerque)
    KRWG-FM, Las Cruces
    TV
    KENW-TV, Portales
    New Mexico PBS KNME-TV (Albuquerque)
    KRWG-TV (Las Cruces)
    During the Reconciliation votes, Senate Republicans blocked Heinrich’s efforts to:
    Protect Public Radio and TV
    Prohibit defunding public radio and television stations that primarily serve rural and Tribal communities.
    Prohibit defunding the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB).
    Protect public radio and television stations that are partners in the Emergency Alert System.
    Protect access to children’s education programming through public television.
    Promote American Values and Counter the People’s Republica of China (PRC) and Russia Influence Globally
    Prevent cuts to funding that counters malign-PRC and Russian influence globally, including to counter Russian aggression in Ukraine.
    Ensure the United States can maintain our long tradition of providing life-saving aid, including food and medicine.
    Maintain the United States’s position as a global leader in humanitarian assistance.
    Combat child marriages and feed children around the world.
    Protect funding for child health, global health security, and to treat and prevent tuberculosis, malaria, and other diseases
    Protect funding for international organizations and life-saving programs, including UNICEF other large-scale humanitarian and hunger prevention programs.

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Tuberville Speaks with Pentagon Nominees During SASC Hearing

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator Tommy Tuberville (Alabama)

    WASHINGTON – Today, U.S. Senator Tommy Tuberville (R-AL) spoke with Vice Admiral Frank Bradley, President Trump’s nominee to be Admiral and Commander of U.S. Special Operations Command (SOCOM) and Lt. Gen. Dagvin Anderson, President Trump’s nominee to be General and Commander of U.S. Africa Command (AFRICOM) during their Senate Armed Services Committee (SASC) nomination hearing. They discussed SOCOM’s military operations in Panama and Latin America to combat narco-terrorism and secure our southern border, along with the strategic need for having a military presence in Africa.

    Read Sen. Tuberville’s remarks below or on YouTube or Rumble.

    TUBERVILLE: “Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Good morning.

    Thanks [to] both of you. Thanks for what you’ve done for our country over your careers—you and your family. What a sacrifice it’s been, but you’ve done an outstanding job.

    ON SOCOM EFFORTS TO COMBAT NARCO-TERRORISTS:

    “Admiral, I think [for] far too long, we’ve had our eyes on other things and not on our hemisphere—whether it’s illegal migrants, drugs, or both. So, what is [the] Special Operations community doing to assist the militaries and governments in our hemisphere like Panama to combat narco-terrorists?”

    BRADLEY: “Senator, in my current capacity, I’m not privy to all of the activities that SOCOM is engaged in, in the Southern Hemisphere. But in listening and watching General Fenton and his leadership over these last three years, I know that the partnerships that our teams have been engaging in and developing remain critical to being able to help them build capacity, to be able to defend themselves, but also to provide security locally, which, of course, helps to prevent and secure our Southern border as well.”

    TUBERVILLE: “Yeah, I’m sure you’re up on the point of the Darién Gap and the problems that’s caused over the years, and relationship with our Special Ops, down in that area—training people—that will probably be in your forte going forward. What’s your thoughts about cooperation activities with Latin America as [you’re] going into this job?”

    BRADLEY: “Yes, sir. I think as the counterterrorism fight informs us, it is far better to find the root of the problem well away from our borders than it is to have to defend them internal to the United States. And so, if confirmed, making it a priority to provide assistance to all of our combatant commanders as far forward as possible, and with those partnered forces to help them to be able to secure their own territory.”

    ON AMERICAN MILITARY PRESENCE IN AFRICA:

    TUBERVILLE: “Yeah, and we and we have problems all over the world. But if we don’t watch our back door, then we’re gonna [really have] problems within our country, which we already have. General, I think we need to be reinforcing our military presence in Africa. Unfortunately, under the previous administration, we seemed like we were doing just the opposite. Niger—you and I talked about this in a meeting in my office—the vacuum that was caused there. China, Russia, Iran, were all too happy to feel the things that we were doing there. What’s your assessment of our withdrawal from Airbase 201? And have we learned from these lessons? And your thoughts about maybe the future there?”

    ANDERSON: “Senator, I appreciate that question and there was a significant investment that went into that airbase. It was in a key area for us to be able to monitor the threat. So, the loss of that is one that we have to find creative ways to continue to get the indicators and warnings of what the terrorists are doing in that area. I think we also have to understand that there is some volatility across the continent. So how do we make smart investments with the partners that we can continue to sustain. I will say that the relationships that we built in Niger with the military over several decades are still there. There is—when the time is right—I believe there will be an opportunity, but that time will have to be determined. And if confirmed, I’ll look at what that is.”

    TUBERVILLE: “Yeah. After your confirmation, I guess, by telling committee and people even watching at home—why do we need to have [a] presence in Africa? What [are] your thoughts?”

    ANDERSON: “So, Africa is key to any strategy. It’s just on strategic terrain. It’s just the waterways that it forms between the Strait of Gibraltar all the way down to the Suez Canal and the Red Sea. It [has] critical minerals and resources that are on the continent that we need for the future economy. Both China and Russia see their strategies going through the continent, and they are going to engage there and so we can cede that ground or we can compete in that ground. And I think we have a very powerful tool to compete with. As Admiral Bradley mentioned, nobody brings more credibility to the counterterrorism fight than the U.S. As a matter of fact, when we rescued that hostage in Niger, the next morning [there was an] influential blogger that posted, ‘The Americans came like the lion in the night. They killed their enemies and rescued their own.’ No other nation on Earth could do that.And that is a powerful symbol across the continent and around the world of what our military and what the United States is capable of. And I do think that some level of engagement in Africa does matter. I’d agree it’s an economy of force, but a small investment goes a long way so that we don’t have a strategic surprise that then distracts the United States from focusing on the rising threats in the Pacific and other areas.”

    TUBERVILLE: “Thank you. Thanks Mr. Chairman.”

    Senator Tommy Tuberville represents Alabama in the United States Senate and is a member of the Senate Armed Services, Agriculture, Veterans’ Affairs, HELP and Aging Committees.

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI United Nations: ‘Perfect storm’ of global crises drove years of food price surges: FAO

    Source: United Nations 2

    The report, to be released later this month, reveals how between 2020 and 2024, the world experienced a dramatic increase in food prices driven by a combination of COVID-19 inflation, the war in Ukraine restricting movements on food and commodities, and increasing climate shocks.  

    “The episodes described in this publication bring up what we call a perfect storm,” said Mr. Torero Cullen.

    Máximo Torero Cullen speaks to journalists at the UN HQs via video link.

    First, he explained that during the COVID-19 pandemic, governments launched fiscal stimulus and relief packages, which increased demand and, thus, global inflation.

    Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine compounded this crisis. Before the war began in 2022, Ukraine was a key exporter of wheat, sunflower oil and fertilisers. The war not only restricted these exports but disrupted trade routes and pushed up fuel and input costs, which amplified inflation across the world.

    Additionally, increasingly frequent and intense climate shocks in major producing regions – such as droughts, floods and heat waves – further aggravated food inflation.

    Worldwide impacts

    Only in 2024 did prices return to pre-COVID levels, meaning that households struggled for multiple years to afford food, with major consequences.

    As real wages fell while food prices increased, household purchasing power was eroded. Households responded by buying cheaper and less nutritious food, reducing meal frequency, and often prioritising meals for certain family members and reducing intake for women and children.

    Mr. Torero Cullen also explained that an increase in food prices directly correlates to an increase in moderate and severe food insecurity. The impacts of this were particularly harsh in Africa and Western Asia, where food imports, dependence and currency depreciation made food even more expensive.

    Moreover, as food prices increased, nutrition outcomes among children under five worsened. The SOFI report illustrated that a 10 per cent food price increase led to a 2.7 to 6.1 per cent increase in moderate to severe wasting, which has long-lasting effects on child development and public health systems.  

    Notably, these grave impacts were uneven, mostly affecting low-income and African countries – many of which are still seeing worsening figures. During the peak of the crisis in January 2023, some low-income countries experienced food price inflation of up to 30 per cent, compared to 13.6 per cent globally.

    Policy recommendations  

    Mr. Torero Cullen finished his briefing by outlining the policy prescriptions detailed in the SOFI report.  

    He first underscored targeted fiscal support. “Social protection measures are the most effective response to food price spikes,” he explained. “This will protect vulnerable populations without creating long-term fiscal risk or market distortions.”  

    He also highlighted avoiding trade disruptions, coordinating monetary and fiscal policies, improving market transparency, and institutional preparedness as essential components for avoiding future crises.

    “This SOFI underscores that inflation can undermine progress. It underlines our vulnerabilities, and it also brings the importance of strengthening resilience, inclusiveness and transparency to be able to avoid and minimize the risk of these problems,” he concluded.  

    MIL OSI United Nations News –

  • MIL-OSI Russia: 155th Joint Mekong River Patrol Begins

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: People’s Republic of China in Russian – People’s Republic of China in Russian –

    An important disclaimer is at the bottom of this article.

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    KUNMING, July 22 (Xinhua) — Law enforcement agencies from China, Laos, Myanmar and Thailand on Tuesday launched the 155th joint patrol of the Mekong River to combat cross-border crime.

    The patrol officially began at around 9 a.m. Tuesday, when three Chinese vessels left Jingha Port in southwest China’s Yunnan Province. Patrol vessels from Laos and Myanmar also set out from ports in Laos and Myanmar at the same time, heading to a pre-designated area.

    The four-day, three-night joint patrol involves more than 100 law enforcement officers from China, Laos, Myanmar and Thailand, as well as seven patrol vessels from those countries, excluding Thailand. The mission will include combined water-land inspections and training in some key waters on the Mekong River, aimed at combating drug trafficking, fraud, smuggling and illegal migration.

    During the patrol, the relevant law enforcement agencies of the four countries will also hold an information-sharing meeting in Chiang Saen, Thailand, to review the security situation in the Lancang-Mekong basin and identify priority areas for further cooperation.

    The previous joint patrol ended at the end of June this year. During it, representatives of the joint patrol group organized various preventive actions in villages, schools and enterprises in the coastal zone, distributing more than 1,000 anti-drug leaflets and 4,000 educational materials.

    The Mekong River, known in China as the Lancangjiang, is one of the most important waterways for transboundary shipping in Southeast Asia. Joint patrols of the Mekong involving China, Laos, Myanmar and Thailand have been conducted since December 2011. –0–

    Please note: This information is raw content obtained directly from the source of the information. It is an accurate report of what the source claims and does not necessarily reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    .

    MIL OSI Russia News –

  • MIL-OSI Russia: Foreign Ministers of Azerbaijan and Georgia Discuss Bilateral Cooperation and Regional Projects

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: People’s Republic of China in Russian – People’s Republic of China in Russian –

    An important disclaimer is at the bottom of this article.

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    Tbilisi, July 22 (Xinhua) — Georgian Foreign Minister Maka Bochorishvili and Azerbaijani Foreign Minister Jeyhun Bayramov held talks in Tbilisi to discuss key areas of bilateral and regional cooperation, the Georgian Foreign Ministry said on Tuesday.

    The parties exchanged views on strengthening political dialogue, cooperation in the areas of energy, transport and trade, and also touched upon current challenges in the area of regional security.

    Following the talks, a joint press conference was held. M. Bochorishvili emphasized the importance of ensuring sustainable peace and stability in the South Caucasus, expressing hope for the earliest possible achievement of a peace agreement between Azerbaijan and Armenia. The head of the Georgian Foreign Ministry placed special emphasis on the trilateral format of cooperation between Azerbaijan, Georgia and Armenia. “We believe that we have the potential to continue cooperation between the three countries in this format,” she said.

    J. Bayramov, for his part, confirmed the unwavering support for Georgia’s territorial integrity and highly appreciated the level of political relations between the two states. He noted that in the first five months of 2025, bilateral trade turnover exceeded USD 330 million, which is 20 percent more than in the same period last year. In addition, as the minister added, Azerbaijan continues to be one of the largest foreign investors in the Georgian economy with a total investment of over USD 3.6 billion.

    J. Bayramov emphasized the strategic importance of joint infrastructure projects, including the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan oil pipeline, the Southern Gas Corridor and the Baku-Tbilisi-Kars railway. According to him, these projects contribute to the expansion of regional connectivity and have great international potential.

    During the talks, the parties also discussed the development of a cross-border project to deliver renewable energy from Azerbaijan through Georgia and the Black Sea to the European market and ways to improve the efficiency of cargo transportation along the Middle Corridor. –0–

    Please note: This information is raw content obtained directly from the source of the information. It is an accurate report of what the source claims and does not necessarily reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    .

    MIL OSI Russia News –

  • MIL-OSI Russia: Iran FM: Lifting sanctions, respecting country’s nuclear rights necessary to resume talks with US

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: People’s Republic of China in Russian – People’s Republic of China in Russian –

    An important disclaimer is at the bottom of this article.

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    TEHRAN, July 22 (Xinhua) — Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said on Tuesday that his country is ready to resume indirect talks with the United States on the condition that sanctions are lifted and Tehran’s right to use nuclear technology for “peaceful” purposes is respected.

    The diplomat made the statement at a meeting with members of the Iranian parliament’s National Security and Foreign Policy Committee, as reported by the official Iranian news agency IRNA, citing committee member Yaghub Rezazadeh.

    According to the legislator, A. Araghchi noted that “if sanctions are lifted and Iran’s right to use peaceful nuclear technologies is respected, indirect negotiations with the United States will take place before the issue of /activating/ the sanctions rollback mechanism is raised in October.”

    The sanctions snapback mechanism is part of the 2015 Iran nuclear deal, formally known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA). It allows other parties to reimpose all international sanctions if Iran fails to comply with the agreement.

    As Y. Rezazadeh pointed out, in addition, the head of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs announced preparations for negotiations on the Iranian nuclear program between Iran and Russia, as well as a meeting of representatives of Iran and three European countries – France, Great Britain and Germany, which is scheduled to take place on July 25 in Istanbul and will be devoted to the same issue.

    Iran signed the JCPOA with six countries – Britain, China, France, Germany, Russia and the United States – in July 2015. Under the deal, Tehran agreed to curb its nuclear program in exchange for sanctions relief.

    In 2018, the United States unilaterally withdrew from the deal and reimposed sanctions on Iran, prompting Tehran to begin gradually backtracking on its nuclear commitments. –0–

    Please note: This information is raw content obtained directly from the source of the information. It is an accurate report of what the source claims and does not necessarily reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    .

    MIL OSI Russia News –

  • MIL-OSI: First Busey Corporation Announces 2025 Second Quarter Earnings

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    LEAWOOD, Kan., July 22, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — First Busey Corporation (Nasdaq: BUSE) Announces 2025 Second Quarter Earnings.

    Net Income   Diluted EPS   Net Interest Margin1   ROAA1   ROATCE1
    $47.4 million   $0.52   3.49%   1.00%   11.24%
    $57.4 million (adj)2   $0.63 (adj)2   3.33% (adj)2   1.21% (adj)2   13.61% (adj)2
                     
    MESSAGE FROM OUR CHAIRMAN & CEO
    This quarter’s bank merger and data conversion represents a significant milestone for our organization, as we officially welcome CrossFirst Bank customers to Busey Bank. We are proud to offer a premier, full-service banking experience for both consumer and commercial clients, with 78 locations spanning 10 states. Our comprehensive services also include a robust wealth management platform and cutting-edge payment technology solutions through FirsTech, Inc. This transformational partnership allows us to enhance Busey’s rich 157-year legacy of service excellence, further advancing our organization for the benefit of all our Pillars—associates, customers, communities, and shareholders.

    Van A. Dukeman
    Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
     

    FINANCIAL RESULTS

    CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (unaudited)
                         
        Three Months Ended   Six Months Ended
    (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)   June 30,
    2025    		   March 31,
    2025    		   June 30,
    2024    		   June 30,
    2025    		   June 30,
    2024
    Total interest income   $ 247,446     $ 166,815     $ 131,939     $ 414,261     $ 257,759  
    Total interest expense     94,263       63,084       49,407       157,347       99,373  
    Net interest income     153,183       103,731       82,532       256,914       158,386  
    Provision for credit losses1     5,700       45,593       1,908       51,293       6,268  
    Net interest income after provision for credit losses1     147,483       58,138       80,624       205,621       152,118  
    Total noninterest income     44,863       21,223       33,703       66,086       68,616  
    Total noninterest expense1     127,833       112,030       75,906       239,863       147,353  
    Income (loss) before income taxes     64,513       (32,669 )     38,421       31,844       73,381  
    Income taxes     17,109       (2,679 )     11,064       14,430       19,799  
    Net income (loss)     47,404       (29,990 )     27,357       17,414       53,582  
    Dividends on preferred stock     155       —       —       155       —  
    Net income (loss) available to common stockholders   $ 47,249     $ (29,990 )   $ 27,357     $ 17,259     $ 53,582  
                         
    Basic earnings (loss) per common share   $ 0.53     $ (0.44 )   $ 0.48     $ 0.22     $ 0.95  
    Diluted earnings (loss) per common share   $ 0.52     $ (0.44 )   $ 0.47     $ 0.22     $ 0.94  
    Effective income tax rate     26.52 %     8.20 %     28.80 %     45.31 %     26.98 %

    ___________________________________________

    1. Beginning in the second quarter of 2025, Busey revised its presentation, for all periods presented, to reclassify the provision for unfunded commitments so that it is now included within the provision for credit losses; therefore, it is no longer included within total noninterest expense.

    Following the acquisition of CrossFirst Bankshares, Inc. (“CrossFirst”) and its subsidiary CrossFirst Bank, by First Busey Corporation, the holding company for Busey Bank, in the first quarter of 2025, CrossFirst Bank was merged with and into Busey Bank (the “Bank Merger”) on June 20, 2025. At the time of the Bank Merger, CrossFirst Bank banking centers became banking centers of Busey Bank. Throughout this document, we refer to First Busey Corporation, together with its consolidated subsidiaries, as “Busey,” the “Company,” “we,” “us,” or “our.”

    Busey’s net income for the second quarter of 2025 was $47.4 million, or $0.52 per diluted common share, compared to a net loss of $30.0 million, or $0.44 per diluted common share, for the first quarter of 2025, and net income of $27.4 million, or $0.47 per diluted common share, for the second quarter of 2024. Annualized return on average assets and annualized return on average tangible common equity2 were 1.00% and 11.24%, respectively, for the second quarter of 2025. The second quarter of 2025 represented the first full quarter in which the CrossFirst acquisition contributed to Busey’s financial results.

    Busey views certain non-operating items, including acquisition-related expenses, restructuring charges, and nonrecurring strategic events, as adjustments to net income reported under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). We also adjust for net securities gains and losses to align with industry and research analyst reporting. The objective of our presentation of adjusted earnings and adjusted earnings metrics is to allow investors and analysts to more clearly identify quarterly trends in core earnings performance. Non-operating pre-tax adjustments for acquisition and restructuring expenses2 in the second quarter of 2025 were $16.6 million, with an additional $4.0 million adjustment to the initial provision for unfunded commitments resulting from the adoption of a new Current Expected Credit Losses (“CECL”) model. Further, net securities gains were $6.0 million, almost entirely related to unrealized gains on Busey’s approximately 3% equity ownership of a financial institution that was the target of an announced acquisition at a significant market premium. For more information and a reconciliation of these non-GAAP measures (which are identified with the End Note labeled as 2) in tabular form, see “Non-GAAP Financial Information” beginning on page 13.

    Adjusted net income,2 which excludes the impact of non-GAAP adjustments, was $57.4 million, or $0.63 per diluted common share, for the second quarter of 2025, compared to $39.9 million, or $0.57 per diluted common share, for the first quarter of 2025 and $30.5 million, or $0.53 per diluted common share, for the second quarter of 2024. Annualized adjusted return on average assets2 and annualized adjusted return on average tangible common equity2 were 1.21% and 13.61%, respectively, for the second quarter of 2025.

    Pre-Provision Net Revenue2

    Pre-provision net revenue2 was $64.2 million for the second quarter of 2025, compared to $28.7 million for the first quarter of 2025 and $40.7 million for the second quarter of 2024. Pre-provision net revenue to average assets2 was 1.35% for the second quarter of 2025, compared to 0.78% for the first quarter of 2025, and 1.35% for the second quarter of 2024.

    Adjusted pre-provision net revenue2 was $80.8 million for the second quarter of 2025, compared to $54.7 million for the first quarter of 2025 and $42.6 million for the second quarter of 2024. Adjusted pre-provision net revenue to average assets2 was 1.70% for the second quarter of 2025, compared to 1.50% for the first quarter of 2025 and 1.42% for the second quarter of 2024.

    Net Interest Income and Net Interest Margin2

    Net interest income was $153.2 million in the second quarter of 2025, compared to $103.7 million in the first quarter of 2025 and $82.5 million in the second quarter of 2024.

    Net interest margin2 was 3.49% for the second quarter of 2025, compared to 3.16% for the first quarter of 2025 and 3.03% for the second quarter of 2024. Excluding purchase accounting accretion, adjusted net interest margin2 was 3.33% for the second quarter of 2025, compared to 3.08% in the first quarter of 2025 and 3.00% in the second quarter of 2024.

    Components of the 33 basis point increase in net interest margin2 during the second quarter of 2025, which includes a full quarter of assets assumed in the CrossFirst acquisition, were as follows:

    • Increased loan portfolio and held for sale loan yields contributed +54 basis points
    • Increased purchase accounting accretion contributed +8 basis points
    • Securities repositioning executed in March contributed +4 basis points
    • Decreased borrowing expense contributed +4 basis points, of which +2 basis points were related to the redemption of subordinated debt in June
    • Increased non-maturity deposit funding costs contributed -25 basis points
    • Decreased cash and securities portfolio yield contributed -12 basis points

    Based on our most recent Asset Liability Management Committee (“ALCO”) model, a +100 basis point parallel rate shock is expected to increase net interest income by 2.8% over the subsequent twelve-month period. Busey continues to evaluate and execute off-balance sheet hedging and balance sheet repositioning strategies as well as embedding rate protection in our asset originations to provide stabilization to net interest income in lower rate environments. Time deposit and savings specials have continued to stabilize the funding base, and we had excess earning cash during the second quarter of 2025. Brokered deposit balances were reduced by $368.6 million during the second quarter of 2025 and at June 30, 2025, the Bank had $353.6 million, or 2.2% of total deposits, of remaining brokered funding. Total deposit cost of funds increased, as expected, from 1.91% during the first quarter of 2025 to 2.21% during the second quarter of 2025. Deposit cost of funds increased due to a full quarter of the higher mix of acquired CrossFirst indexed/managed rate customer products and brokered deposits. Busey will continue to deploy excess cash to pay down non-core and non-relationship high cost funding, which we anticipate will compress the asset base in the short term while helping to reduce the Bank’s overall funding cost. We expect the deposit beta will lessen during the year and is expected to normalize in a range between 45% and 50% of the upper limit of the federal funds target range.

    Noninterest Income

      Three Months Ended   Six Months Ended
    (dollars in thousands) June 30,
    2025    		   March 31,
    2025    		   June 30,
    2024    		   June 30,
    2025    		   June 30,
    2024
    NONINTEREST INCOME                  
    Wealth management fees $ 16,777   $ 17,364     $ 15,917     $ 34,141     $ 31,466  
    Payment technology solutions   4,956     5,073       5,915       10,029       11,624  
    Treasury management services   4,981     3,017       2,145       7,998       4,046  
    Card services and ATM fees   4,880     3,709       3,430       8,589       6,390  
    Other service charges on deposit accounts   1,513     1,533       2,321       3,046       4,669  
    Mortgage revenue   776     329       478       1,105       1,224  
    Income on bank owned life insurance   1,745     1,446       1,442       3,191       2,861  
    Realized net gains (losses) on the sale of mortgage servicing rights   —     —       277       —       7,742  
    Net securities gains (losses)   5,997     (15,768 )     (353 )     (9,771 )     (6,728 )
    Other noninterest income   3,238     4,520       2,131       7,758       5,322  
    Total noninterest income $ 44,863   $ 21,223     $ 33,703     $ 66,086     $ 68,616  
                                         

    Total noninterest income increased by 111.4% compared to the first quarter of 2025 and increased by 33.1% compared to the second quarter of 2024, primarily due to net securities gains and losses, as well as the benefit of a full quarter of income from the CrossFirst acquisition.

    Excluding the impact of net securities gains and losses and the gains on the sale of mortgage servicing rights, adjusted noninterest income2 increased by 5.1% to $38.9 million, or 20.2% of operating revenue2, during the second quarter of 2025, compared to $37.0 million, or 26.3% of operating revenue2, for the first quarter of 2025. Compared to the second quarter of 2024, adjusted noninterest income2 increased by 15.1% from $33.8 million, or 29.0% of operating revenue.2

    Our fee-based businesses continue to add revenue diversification. Wealth management fees, wealth management referral fees included in other noninterest income, and payment technology solutions contributed 56.4% of adjusted noninterest income2 for the second quarter of 2025.

    Noteworthy components of noninterest income are as follows:

    • Wealth management fees declined by 3.4% compared to the first quarter of 2025. The decrease in the second quarter of 2025 was primarily related to seasonal fees, with a decrease in farm management fees, partially offset by higher tax preparation fees. Compared to the second quarter of 2024 wealth management fees increased by 5.4%. Busey’s Wealth Management division ended the second quarter of 2025 with $14.10 billion in assets under care, compared to $13.68 billion at the end of the first quarter of 2025 and $13.02 billion at the end of the second quarter of 2024. Our portfolio management team continues to focus on long-term returns and managing risk in the face of volatile markets and has outperformed its blended benchmark3 over the last three and five years.
    • Payment technology solutions includes income from electronic payments, merchant processing, and lockbox. Revenue in this category declined by 2.3% compared the first quarter of 2025 and declined by 16.2% compared to the second quarter of 2024, primarily due to decreases in income from electronic payments.
    • Treasury management services consist primarily of business analysis charges and wire transfer fees on commercial accounts. Income from treasury management services increased by 65.1% compared to the first quarter of 2025 and increased by 132.2% compared to the second quarter of 2024 due to the addition of CrossFirst commercial services.
    • Card services and ATM fees, which include both commercial and consumer accounts, increased by 31.6% compared to the first quarter of 2025 and increased by 42.3% compared to the second quarter of 2024 primarily due to addition of CrossFirst corporate card services.
    • Other service charges on deposit accounts declined by 1.3% compared to the first quarter of 2025 and declined by 34.8% compared to the second quarter of 2024. Declines are largely related to lower non-sufficient fund charges.
    • Other noninterest income decreased by 28.4% compared to the first quarter of 2025, primarily due to declines in gains on commercial loan sales, loss on sales of other real estate owned and a related reduction in income from the sold property, and decreases in venture capital investments. Compared to the second quarter of 2024, other noninterest income increased by 51.9%, primarily due to increases in venture capital investments, commercial loan servicing income, and other loan fee income.

    Operating Efficiency

      Three Months Ended   Six Months Ended
    (dollars in thousands) June 30,
    2025    		   March 31,
    2025    		   June 30,
    2024    		   June 30,
    2025    		   June 30,
    2024
    NONINTEREST EXPENSE                  
    Salaries, wages, and employee benefits $ 78,360   $ 67,563   $ 43,478   $ 145,923   $ 85,568
    Data processing   14,021     9,575     7,100     23,596     13,650
    Net occupancy expense of premises   7,832     5,799     4,590     13,631     9,310
    Furniture and equipment expenses   2,409     1,744     1,695     4,153     3,508
    Professional fees   2,874     9,511     2,495     12,385     4,748
    Amortization of intangible assets   4,592     3,083     2,629     7,675     5,038
    Interchange expense   1,297     1,343     1,733     2,640     3,344
    FDIC insurance   2,424     2,167     1,460     4,591     2,860
    Other noninterest expense1   14,024     11,245     10,726     25,269     19,327
    Total noninterest expense1 $ 127,833   $ 112,030   $ 75,906   $ 239,863   $ 147,353

    ___________________________________________

    1. Beginning in the second quarter of 2025, Busey revised its presentation, for all periods presented, to reclassify the provision for unfunded commitments so that it is now included within the provision for credit losses; therefore, it is no longer included within other noninterest expense or total noninterest expense.

    Total noninterest expense increased by 14.1% compared to the first quarter of 2025 and increased by 68.4% compared to the second quarter of 2024. Growth in noninterest expense was primarily attributable to nonrecurring acquisition expenses related to the CrossFirst acquisition, added costs for operating expenses for two banks during the majority of the second quarter, until the banks were merged on June 20, 2025, and increased expense associated with the larger organization and branch network. Annual pre-tax expense synergy estimates resulting from the CrossFirst acquisition remain on track at $25.0 million, and we expect 50% of the identified synergies to be realized in 2025 and 100% in 2026.

    Adjusted noninterest expense,2 which excludes acquisition and restructuring expenses and amortization of intangible assets, was $106.6 million in the second quarter of 2025, a 28.6% increase compared to $82.9 million in the first quarter of 2025 and a 50.1% increase compared to $71.1 million in the second quarter of 2024.

    Noteworthy components of noninterest expense are as follows:

    • Salaries, wages, and employee benefits expenses increased by $10.8 million compared to the first quarter of 2025, with acquisition and restructuring expenses declining by $4.3 million. In connection with the CrossFirst acquisition in March and the addition of 16 banking centers, Busey’s workforce expanded, which resulted in only one month of associated expenses during the first quarter of 2025 in contrast to a full quarter of associated expenses reflected in the Company’s results for the second quarter of 2025. Compared to the second quarter of 2024, salaries, wages, and employee benefits expenses increased by $34.9 million, of which $10.4 million was attributable to increases in acquisition and restructuring expenses. Including associates added in connection with the CrossFirst acquisition, Busey has added 430 FTEs over the past year.
    • Data processing expense increased by $4.4 million compared to the first quarter of 2025 and by $6.9 million compared to the second quarter of 2024, of which $1.7 million and $3.6 million, respectively, was attributable to increases in acquisition and restructuring expenses. Busey has continued to make investments in technology enhancements and has also experienced inflation-driven price increases.
    • Professional fees declined by $6.6 million compared to the first quarter of 2025, which was primarily driven by a $7.0 million decrease in acquisition and restructuring expenses. Compared to the second quarter of 2024, professional fees increased by $0.4 million, primarily due to increased audit and accounting fees and legal fees, partially offset by $0.1 million declines in acquisition and restructuring expenses.
    • Amortization of intangible assets increased by $1.5 million compared to the first quarter of 2025, and by $2.0 million compared to the second quarter of 2024. The CrossFirst acquisition added an estimated $81.8 million of finite-lived intangible assets with amortization of $2.4 million and $3.1 million during the second quarter of 2025 and the first six months of 2025, respectively. Busey uses an accelerated amortization methodology.
    • Other noninterest expense increased by $2.8 million compared to the first quarter of 2025, and increased by $3.3 million compared to the second quarter of 2024. Items contributing to the increases included marketing, business development, supplies, and onboarding costs as well as increases in acquisition and restructuring expenses of $0.2 million compared to the first quarter of 2025 and $0.5 million compared to the second quarter of 2024.

    Busey’s efficiency ratio2 was 63.9% for the second quarter of 2025, compared to 77.1% for the first quarter of 2025 and 62.6% for the second quarter of 2024. Our adjusted efficiency2 ratio was 55.3% for the second quarter of 2025, compared to 58.7% for the first quarter of 2025, and 60.9% for the second quarter of 2024.

    Busey’s annualized ratio of adjusted noninterest expense to average assets was 2.24% for the second quarter of 2025, compared to 2.27% for the first quarter of 2025 and 2.36% for the second quarter of 2024. As our business grows, Busey remains focused on prudently managing our expense base and operating efficiency.

    BALANCE SHEET STRENGTH

    CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (unaudited)
               
      As of
    (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) June 30,
    2025    		   March 31,
    2025    		   June 30,
    2024
    ASSETS          
    Cash and cash equivalents $ 752,352     $ 1,200,292     $ 285,269  
    Debt securities available for sale   2,217,788       2,273,874       1,829,896  
    Debt securities held to maturity   802,965       815,402       851,261  
    Equity securities   16,171       10,828       9,618  
    Loans held for sale   10,497       7,270       11,286  
    Portfolio loans   13,808,619       13,868,357       7,998,912  
    Allowance for credit losses   (183,334 )     (195,210 )     (85,226 )
    Restricted bank stock   77,112       53,518       6,884  
    Premises and equipment, net   181,394       182,003       121,647  
    Right of use assets   38,065       40,594       11,137  
    Goodwill and other intangible assets, net   488,181       496,118       370,580  
    Other assets   708,930       711,206       560,152  
    Total assets $ 18,918,740     $ 19,464,252     $ 11,971,416  
               
    LIABILITIES & STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY          
    Liabilities          
    Deposits:          
      Noninterest-bearing deposits $ 3,590,363     $ 3,693,070     $ 2,832,776  
      Interest-bearing checking, savings, and money market deposits   9,578,953       9,675,324       5,619,470  
      Time deposits   2,632,456       3,091,076       1,523,889  
    Total deposits   15,801,772       16,459,470       9,976,135  
    Securities sold under agreements to repurchase   158,030       137,340       140,283  
    Short-term borrowings   —       11,209       —  
    Long-term debt   189,726       313,535       227,245  
    Junior subordinated debt owed to unconsolidated trusts   77,187       77,117       74,693  
    Lease liabilities   39,235       41,111       11,469  
    Other liabilities   240,244       244,864       207,781  
    Total liabilities   16,506,194       17,284,646       10,637,606  
               
    Stockholders’ equity          
    Retained earnings   273,799       249,484       261,820  
    Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)   (155,311 )     (172,810 )     (220,326 )
    Other stockholders’ equity1   2,294,058       2,102,932       1,292,316  
    Total stockholders’ equity   2,412,546       2,179,606       1,333,810  
    Total liabilities & stockholders’ equity $ 18,918,740     $ 19,464,252     $ 11,971,416  

    ___________________________________________

    1. Net balance of preferred stock ($0.001 par value), common stock ($0.001 par value), additional paid-in capital, and treasury stock.
    AVERAGE BALANCES (unaudited)
                       
      Three Months Ended   Six Months Ended
    (dollars in thousands) June 30,
    2025    		   March 31,
    2025    		   June 30,
    2024    		   June 30,
    2025    		   June 30,
    2024
    ASSETS                  
    Cash and cash equivalents $ 868,164   $ 861,021   $ 346,381   $ 864,613   $ 470,287
    Investment securities   3,083,284     2,782,435     2,737,313     2,933,690     2,822,228
    Loans held for sale   6,899     3,443     9,353     5,181     7,093
    Portfolio loans   13,840,190     9,838,337     8,010,636     11,850,318     7,804,976
    Interest-earning assets   17,700,356     13,363,594     11,000,785     15,543,955     11,003,344
    Total assets   19,068,086     14,831,298     12,089,692     16,961,396     12,056,950
                       
    LIABILITIES & STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY                  
    Noninterest-bearing deposits   3,542,617     3,036,127     2,816,293     3,290,770     2,762,439
    Interest-bearing deposits   12,450,529     9,142,781     7,251,582     10,805,793     7,290,844
    Total deposits   15,993,146     12,178,908     10,067,875     14,096,563     10,053,283
    Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase   141,978     144,838     144,370     143,400     161,514
    Interest-bearing liabilities   12,985,015     9,627,841     7,725,832     11,315,702     7,778,744
    Total liabilities   16,783,504     12,896,222     10,757,877     14,850,601     10,753,180
    Stockholders’ equity – preferred   103,619     2,669     —     53,423     —
    Stockholders’ equity – common   2,180,963     1,932,407     1,331,815     2,057,372     1,303,770
    Tangible common equity1   1,686,490     1,521,387     955,591     1,604,394     939,150

    ___________________________________________

    1. See “Non-GAAP Financial Information” for reconciliation.

    Busey’s financial strength is built on a long-term conservative operating approach. That focus has endured over time and will continue to guide us in the future.

    Total assets were $18.92 billion as of June 30, 2025, compared to $19.46 billion as of March 31, 2025, and $11.97 billion as of June 30, 2024. Average interest-earning assets were $17.70 billion for the second quarter of 2025, compared to $13.36 billion for the first quarter of 2025, and $11.00 billion for the second quarter of 2024.

    Portfolio Loans

    We remain steadfast in our conservative approach to underwriting and our disciplined approach to pricing. Loan demand has been tempered with borrowers hesitant to invest because of lingering macroeconomic uncertainty. At the same time, our commercial real estate portfolio continues to season, resulting in payoffs as properties are completed, stabilized, and refinanced to permanent markets or sold. We expect continued pressure from paydowns within our commercial real estate portfolio through the remainder of 2025. Portfolio loans totaled $13.81 billion at June 30, 2025, compared to $13.87 billion at March 31, 2025, and $8.00 billion at June 30, 2024.

    Average portfolio loans were $13.84 billion for the second quarter of 2025, compared to $9.84 billion for the first quarter of 2025 and $8.01 billion for the second quarter of 2024.

    Asset Quality

    Asset quality continues to be strong. Busey Bank maintains a well-diversified loan portfolio and, as a matter of policy and practice, limits concentration exposure in any particular loan segment. Following the Bank Merger in June, we are operating as one bank, with a singular credit policy, concentration limits, and monitoring that will continue to align with Busey Bank’s pillars of credit quality.

    ASSET QUALITY (unaudited)
               
      As of
    (dollars in thousands) June 30,
    2025    		   March 31,
    2025    		   June 30,
    2024
    Total assets $ 18,918,740     $ 19,464,252     $ 11,971,416  
    Portfolio loans   13,808,619       13,868,357       7,998,912  
    Loans 30 – 89 days past due   42,188       18,554       23,463  
    Non-performing loans:          
    Non-accrual loans   53,614       48,647       8,393  
    Loans 90+ days past due and still accruing   941       6,077       712  
    Non-performing loans   54,555       54,724       9,105  
    Other non-performing assets   3,596       4,757       90  
    Non-performing assets   58,151       59,481       9,195  
    Substandard (excludes 90+ days past due)   117,580       131,078       86,579  
    Classified assets $ 175,731     $ 190,559     $ 95,774  
               
    Allowance for credit losses $ 183,334     $ 195,210     $ 85,226  
               
    RATIOS          
    Non-performing loans to portfolio loans   0.40 %     0.39 %     0.11 %
    Non-performing assets to total assets   0.31 %     0.31 %     0.08 %
    Non-performing assets to portfolio loans and other non-performing assets   0.42 %     0.43 %     0.11 %
    Allowance for credit losses to portfolio loans   1.33 %     1.41 %     1.07 %
    Coverage ratio of the allowance for credit losses to non-performing loans 3.36 x   3.57 x   9.36 x
    Classified assets to Bank Tier 1 capital1and reserves   7.70 %     8.40 %     6.40 %

    ___________________________________________

    1. Capital amounts for the second quarter of 2025 are not yet finalized and are subject to change.

    Loans 30-89 days past due increased by $23.6 million compared to March 31, 2025, and increased by $18.7 million compared to June 30, 2024. Increases are primarily due to two commercial credits, one of which—representing approximately $12.5 million—was brought current after the end of the second quarter.

    Non-performing loans decreased by $0.2 million compared to March 31, 2025, and increased by $45.5 million compared to June 30, 2024, with the increase compared to the prior year due to loans purchased with credit deterioration (“PCD” loans) assumed in the CrossFirst acquisition. Non-performing loans were 0.40% of portfolio loans as of June 30, 2025, a 1 basis point increase from March 31, 2025, and a 29 basis point increase from June 30, 2024.

    Non-performing assets decreased by $1.3 million compared to March 31, 2025, and increased by $49.0 million compared to June 30, 2024, with the increase compared to the prior year due to the PCD loans assumed in the CrossFirst acquisition. Non-performing assets represented 0.31% of total assets as of both June 30, 2025, and March 31, 2025, which is a 23 basis point increase from June 30, 2024.

    Classified assets decreased by $14.8 million compared to March 31, 2025, and increased by $80.0 million compared to June 30, 2024, with the increase compared to the prior year due to the PCD loans assumed in the CrossFirst acquisition.

    The allowance for credit losses was $183.3 million as of June 30, 2025, representing 1.33% of total portfolio loans outstanding, and providing coverage of 3.36 times our non-performing loans balance.

    NET CHARGE-OFFS (RECOVERIES) AND PROVISION EXPENSE (RELEASE) (unaudited)
                       
      Three Months Ended   Six Months Ended
    (dollars in thousands) June 30,
    2025    		   March 31,
    2025    		   June 30,
    2024    		   June 30,
    2025    		   June 30,
    2024
    Net charge-offs (recoveries) $ 12,882   $ 31,429   $ 9,856     $ 44,311   $ 15,072  
                       
    Provision for loan losses1 $ 1,005   $ 42,452   $ 2,277     $ 43,457   $ 7,315  
    Provision for unfunded commitments2   4,695     3,141     (369 )     7,836     (1,047 )
    Provision for credit losses3 $ 5,700   $ 45,593   $ 1,908     $ 51,293   $ 6,268  

    ___________________________________________

    1. Amounts reported as provision for loan losses for periods ending prior to June 30, 2025, were previously reported as provision for credit losses. March 31, 2025, included $42.4 million to establish an initial allowance for credit losses for loans purchased without credit deterioration (“non-PCD” loans) following the close of the CrossFirst acquisition.
    2. June 30, 2025, included an additional $4.0 million adjustment to the initial provision for unfunded commitments resulting from the adoption of a new CECL model. March 31, 2025, included $3.1 million to establish an initial allowance for unfunded commitments following the close of the CrossFirst acquisition.
    3. Beginning in the second quarter of 2025, Busey revised its presentation, for all periods presented, to reclassify the provision for unfunded commitments so that it is now included within the provision for credit losses.

    Net charge-offs decreased by $18.5 million when compared to the first quarter of 2025, and increased by $3.0 million when compared with the second quarter of 2024. Net charge-offs during the second quarter of 2025 primarily related to one legacy-Busey medical office credit. Net charge-offs during the first quarter of 2025 included $29.6 million related to PCD loans acquired from CrossFirst Bank, which were fully reserved at acquisition and did not require recording additional provision expense.

    The $1.0 million provision for loan losses recorded in the second quarter of 2025 included a release of the PCD provision of $11.8 million due to PCD loan payoffs/paydowns and non-PCD provision expense of $12.8 million to support charge-offs, to adjust for the loan portfolio mix, and as a response to economic factors.

    Deposits

    Total deposits were $15.80 billion at June 30, 2025, compared to $16.46 billion at March 31, 2025, and $9.98 billion at June 30, 2024. Average deposits were $15.99 billion for the second quarter of 2025, compared to $12.18 billion for the first quarter of 2025 and $10.07 billion for the second quarter of 2024. The deliberate run-off of higher cost brokered deposits and listing service CD reductions accounted for $386.8 million of the quarter over quarter decrease as well as seasonal tax payments that put additional pressure on funding during the quarter.

    Core deposits2 accounted for 92.5% of total deposits as of June 30, 2025. The quality of our core deposit franchise is a critical value driver of our institution. We estimated that 33% of our deposits were uninsured and uncollateralized4 as of June 30, 2025, and we have sufficient on- and off-balance sheet liquidity to manage deposit fluctuations and the liquidity needs of our customers.

    We have executed various deposit campaigns to attract term funding and savings accounts at a lower rate than our marginal cost of funds. New certificate of deposit production in the second quarter of 2025 had a weighted average term of 8.0 months at a rate of 3.74%, which was 80 basis points below our average marginal wholesale equivalent-term funding cost during the quarter.

    Borrowings

    On June 1, 2025, Busey redeemed the entire $125.0 million outstanding principal amount of its 5.25% Fixed-to-Floating Rate Subordinated Notes due 2030 (the “Subordinated Notes”). The aggregate principal amount of the Subordinated Notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon up to, but excluding, June 1, 2025, was $128.3 million.

    Liquidity

    As of June 30, 2025, Busey’s available sources of on- and off-balance sheet liquidity5 totaled $7.95 billion. Furthermore, Busey’s balance sheet liquidity profile continues to be aided by the cash flows expected from Busey’s relatively short-duration securities portfolio. Those cash flows were approximately $123.1 million in the second quarter of 2025. Cash flows from maturing securities within our portfolio are expected to be approximately $181.0 million for the remainder of 2025, with a current book yield of 2.52%, and approximately $289.7 million for 2026, with a current book yield of 2.58%.

    Capital Strength

    The strength of our balance sheet is also reflected in our capital foundation. Although still impacted by the strategic deployment of capital for the CrossFirst acquisition, as well as by Busey’s active share repurchase program, our capital ratios remain strong, and as of June 30, 2025, our estimated regulatory capital ratios6 continued to provide a buffer of more than $870 million above levels required to be designated well-capitalized. Busey’s Common Equity Tier 1 ratio is estimated6 to be 12.22% at June 30, 2025, compared to 12.00% at March 31, 2025, and 13.20% at June 30, 2024. Our Total Capital to Risk Weighted Assets ratio is estimated6 to be 15.75% at June 30, 2025, compared to 14.88% at March 31, 2025, and 17.50% at June 30, 2024.

    Busey’s tangible common equity2 was $1.71 billion at June 30, 2025, compared to $1.68 billion at March 31, 2025, and $963.2 million at June 30, 2024. Tangible common equity2 represented 9.27% of tangible assets at June 30, 2025, compared to 8.83% at March 31, 2025, and 8.30% at June 30, 2024.

    Busey’s tangible book value per common share2 was $19.18 at June 30, 2025, compared to $18.62 at March 31, 2025, and $16.97 at June 30, 2024, reflecting a 13.0% year-over-year increase.

    Dividends

    Busey’s strong capital levels, coupled with its earnings, have allowed the Company to provide a steady return to its stockholders through dividends. During the second quarter of 2025, Busey paid a dividend of $0.25 per share on its common stock. Busey has consistently paid dividends to its common stockholders since the bank holding company was organized in 1980. Additionally, during the second quarter of 2025, Busey paid a dividend of $20.00 per share on its Series A Non-cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, which was issued in connection with the CrossFirst acquisition.

    Series B Preferred Stock Issuance

    On May 20, 2025, Busey issued an aggregate of 8,600,000 depositary shares (the “Depositary Shares”), each representing a 1/40th interest in a share of Busey’s 8.25% Fixed-Rate Series B Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, $0.001 par value (the “Series B Preferred Stock”), with a liquidation preference of $1,000 per share of Series B Preferred Stock (equivalent to $25 per Depositary Share). Additional information about the Depositary Shares and Series B Preferred Stock issuance can be found in Busey’s 8-K filed with the SEC on May 20, 2025, and the related exhibits thereto.

    Share Repurchases

    During the second quarter of 2025, Busey’s board of directors authorized the purchase of up to 2,000,000 additional shares of the Company’s common stock under Busey’s stock repurchase plan. Busey purchased 1,012,000 shares of its common stock under the plan during the second quarter of 2025 at a weighted average price of $21.40 per share for a total of $21.7 million. As of June 30, 2025, Busey had 2,687,275 shares remaining available for repurchase under the plan.

    SECOND QUARTER EARNINGS INVESTOR PRESENTATION

    For additional information on Busey’s financial condition and operating results, please refer to our Q2 2025 Earnings Investor Presentation furnished via Form 8‑K on July 22, 2025, in connection with this earnings release.

    CORPORATE PROFILE

    As of June 30, 2025, First Busey Corporation (Nasdaq: BUSE) was a $18.92 billion financial holding company headquartered in Leawood, Kansas.

    Busey Bank, a wholly-owned bank subsidiary of First Busey Corporation headquartered in Champaign, Illinois, had total assets of $18.87 billion as of June 30, 2025. Busey Bank currently has 78 banking centers, with 21 in Central Illinois markets, 17 in suburban Chicago markets, 20 in the St. Louis Metropolitan Statistical Area, four in the Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington Metropolitan Statistical Area, three in the Kansas City Metropolitan Statistical Area, three in Southwest Florida, one in Indianapolis, two in Oklahoma City, one in Tulsa, one in Wichita, one in Denver, one in Colorado Springs, one in Phoenix, one in Tucson, and one in New Mexico. More information about Busey Bank can be found at busey.com.

    Through Busey’s Wealth Management division, the Company provides a full range of asset management, investment, brokerage, fiduciary, philanthropic advisory, tax preparation, and farm management services to individuals, businesses, and foundations. Assets under care totaled $14.10 billion as of June 30, 2025. More information about Busey’s Wealth Management services can be found at busey.com/wealth-management.

    Busey Bank’s wholly-owned subsidiary, FirsTech, specializes in the evolving financial technology needs of small and medium-sized businesses, highly regulated enterprise industries, and financial institutions. FirsTech provides comprehensive and innovative payment technology solutions, including online, mobile, and voice-recognition bill payments; money and data movement; merchant services; direct debit services; lockbox remittance processing for payments made by mail; and walk-in payments at retail agents. Additionally, FirsTech simplifies client workflows through integrations enabling support with billing, reconciliation, bill reminders, and treasury services. More information about FirsTech can be found at firstechpayments.com.

    For the fourth consecutive year, Busey was named among Forbes’ 2025’s America’s Best Banks. In 2025, Forbes also recognized Busey as a Best-in-State Bank, based on rankings of customer service, quality of financial advice, fee structures, ease of digital services, accessing help at branch locations and the degree of trust inspired. Busey was also named among the 2024 Best Banks to Work For by American Banker and the 2024 Best Places to Work in Money Management by Pensions and Investments. We are honored to be consistently recognized as an outstanding financial services organization with an engaged culture of integrity and commitment to community development.

    NON-GAAP FINANCIAL INFORMATION

    This earnings release contains certain financial information determined by methods other than GAAP. Management uses these non-GAAP measures, together with the related GAAP measures, in analysis of Busey’s performance and in making business decisions, as well as for comparison to Busey’s peers. Busey believes the adjusted measures are useful for investors and management to understand the effects of certain non-core and non-recurring items and provide additional perspective on Busey’s performance over time.

    The following tables present reconciliations between these non-GAAP measures and what management believes to be the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures.

    These non-GAAP disclosures have inherent limitations and are not audited. They should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for operating results reported in accordance with GAAP, nor are they necessarily comparable to non-GAAP performance measures that may be presented by other companies. Tax effected numbers included in these non-GAAP disclosures are based on estimated statutory rates, estimated federal income tax rates, or effective tax rates, as noted with the tables below.

    RECONCILIATION OF NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES (Unaudited)

    Pre-Provision Net Revenue and Related Measures
                         
        Three Months Ended   Six Months Ended
    (dollars in thousands)   June 30,
    2025    		   March 31,
    2025    		   June 30,
    2024    		   June 30,
    2025    		   June 30,
    2024
    Net interest income (GAAP)   $ 153,183     $ 103,731     $ 82,532     $ 256,914     $ 158,386  
    Total noninterest income (GAAP)     44,863       21,223       33,703       66,086       68,616  
    Net security (gains) losses (GAAP)     (5,997 )     15,768       353       9,771       6,728  
    Total noninterest expense (GAAP)1     (127,833 )     (112,030 )     (75,906 )     (239,863 )     (147,353 )
    Pre-provision net revenue (Non-GAAP) [a]   64,216       28,692       40,682       92,908       86,377  
    Acquisition and restructuring expenses, excluding initial provision expenses     16,600       26,026       2,212       42,626       2,620  
    Realized net (gains) losses on the sale of mortgage service rights     —       —       (277 )     —       (7,742 )
    Adjusted pre-provision net revenue (Non-GAAP) [b] $ 80,816     $ 54,718     $ 42,617     $ 135,534     $ 81,255  
                         
    Average total assets [c] $ 19,068,086     $ 14,831,298     $ 12,089,692     $ 16,961,396     $ 12,056,950  
                         
    Pre-provision net revenue to average total assets (Non-GAAP)2 [a÷c]   1.35 %     0.78 %     1.35 %     1.10 %     1.44 %
    Adjusted pre-provision net revenue to average total assets (Non-GAAP)2 [b÷c]   1.70 %     1.50 %     1.42 %     1.61 %     1.36 %

    ___________________________________________

    1. Beginning in the second quarter of 2025, Busey revised its presentation, for all periods presented, to reclassify the provision for unfunded commitments so that it is now included within the provision for credit losses; therefore, it is no longer included within total noninterest expense.
    2. Annualized measure.
    Adjusted Net Income, Average Tangible Common Equity, and Related Ratios
                         
        Three Months Ended   Six Months Ended
    (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)   June 30,
    2025    		   March 31,
    2025    		   June 30,
    2024    		   June 30,
    2025    		   June 30,
    2024
    Net income (loss) (GAAP) [a] $ 47,404     $ (29,990 )   $ 27,357     $ 17,414     $ 53,582  
    Day 2 provision for credit losses1     —       45,572       —       45,572       —  
    Adjustment of initial provision for unfunded commitments due to adoption of new model1     4,030       —       —       4,030       —  
    Other acquisition expenses     16,600       26,026       2,212       42,626       2,497  
    Restructuring expenses     —       —       —       —       123  
    Net securities (gains) losses     (5,997 )     15,768       353       9,771       6,728  
    Realized net (gains) losses on the sale of mortgage servicing rights     —       —       (277 )     —       (7,742 )
    Related tax (benefit) expense2     (4,971 )     (22,069 )     (572 )     (27,040 )     (402 )
    Non-recurring deferred tax adjustment3     328       4,591       1,446       4,919       1,446  
    Adjusted net income (Non-GAAP)4 [b]   57,394       39,898       30,519       97,292       56,232  
    Preferred dividends [c]   155       —       —       155       —  
    Adjusted net income available to common stockholders (Non-GAAP) [d] $ 57,239     $ 39,898     $ 30,519     $ 97,137     $ 56,232  
                         
    Weighted average number of common shares outstanding, diluted (GAAP) [e]   90,883,711       68,517,647       57,853,231       80,251,577       57,129,865  
    Diluted earnings (loss) per common share (GAAP) [(a-c)÷e] $ 0.52     $ (0.44 )   $ 0.47     $ 0.22     $ 0.94  
                         
    Weighted average number of common shares outstanding, diluted (Non-GAAP)5 [f]   90,883,711       69,502,717       57,853,231       80,251,577       57,129,865  
    Adjusted diluted earnings per common share (Non-GAAP)5,6 [d÷f] $ 0.63     $ 0.57     $ 0.53     $ 1.21     $ 0.98  
                         
    Average total assets [g] $ 19,068,086     $ 14,831,298     $ 12,089,692     $ 16,961,396     $ 12,056,950  
    Return on average assets (Non-GAAP)6 [a÷g]   1.00 %   (0.82)%     0.91 %     0.21 %     0.89 %
    Adjusted return on average assets (Non-GAAP)4,6 [b÷g]   1.21 %     1.09 %     1.02 %     1.16 %     0.94 %
                         
    Average common equity   $ 2,180,963     $ 1,932,407     $ 1,331,815     $ 2,057,372     $ 1,303,770  
    Average goodwill and other intangible assets, net     (494,473 )     (411,020 )     (376,224 )     (452,978 )     (364,620 )
    Average tangible common equity (Non-GAAP) [h] $ 1,686,490     $ 1,521,387     $ 955,591     $ 1,604,394     $ 939,150  
                         
    Return on average tangible common equity (Non-GAAP)6 [(a-c)÷h]   11.24 %   (7.99)%     11.51 %     2.17 %     11.47 %
    Adjusted return on average tangible common equity (Non-GAAP)4,6 [d÷h]   13.61 %     10.64 %     12.85 %     12.21 %     12.04 %

    ___________________________________________

    1. The Day 2 provision represents the initial provision for credit losses recorded in connection with the CrossFirst acquisition to establish an allowance on non-PCD loans and unfunded commitments and is reflected within the provision for credit losses line on the Statement of Income.
    2. Tax benefits were calculated for the year-to-date periods using tax rates of 26.51% and 25.03% for the six months ended June 30, 2025 and 2024, respectively. Tax benefits for the quarterly periods were calculated as the year-to-date tax amounts less the tax reported for previous quarters during the year.
    3. A deferred valuation tax adjustment in 2025 was recorded in connection with the CrossFirst acquisition and the expansion of Busey’s footprint into new states. Additionally, 2025 includes a write-off of deferred tax assets related to non-deductible acquisition-related expenses. A deferred tax valuation adjustment in 2024 resulted from a change to Busey’s Illinois apportionment rate due to recently enacted regulations. Deferred tax adjustments are reflected within the income taxes line on the Statement of Income.
    4. Beginning in 2025, Busey revised its calculation of adjusted net income for all periods presented to include, as applicable, adjustments for net securities gains and losses, realized net gains and losses on the sale of mortgage servicing rights, and one-time deferred tax valuation adjustments. In 2024, these adjusting items were presented as further adjustments to adjusted net income.
    5. Dilution includes shares that would have been dilutive if there had been net income during the period.
    6. Annualized measure.
    Tax-Equivalent Net Interest Income, Adjusted Net Interest Income, Net Interest Margin, and Adjusted Net Interest Margin
                         
        Three Months Ended   Six Months Ended
    (dollars in thousands)   June 30,
    2025    		   March 31,
    2025    		   June 30,
    2024    		   June 30,
    2025    		   June 30,
    2024
    Net interest income (GAAP)   $ 153,183     $ 103,731     $ 82,532     $ 256,914     $ 158,386  
    Tax-equivalent adjustment1     791       537       402       1,328       851  
    Tax-equivalent net interest income (Non-GAAP) [a]   153,974       104,268       82,934       258,242       159,237  
    Purchase accounting accretion related to business combinations     (7,119 )     (2,728 )     (812 )     (9,847 )     (1,016 )
    Adjusted net interest income (Non-GAAP) [b] $ 146,855     $ 101,540     $ 82,122     $ 248,395     $ 158,221  
                         
    Average interest-earning assets (Non-GAAP) [c] $ 17,700,356     $ 13,363,594     $ 11,000,785     $ 15,543,955     $ 11,003,344  
                         
    Net interest margin (Non-GAAP)2 [a÷c]   3.49 %     3.16 %     3.03 %     3.35 %     2.91 %
    Adjusted net interest margin (Non-GAAP)2 [b÷c]   3.33 %     3.08 %     3.00 %     3.22 %     2.89 %

    ___________________________________________

    1. Tax-equivalent adjustments were calculated using an estimated federal income tax rate of 21%, applied to non-taxable interest income on investments and loans.
    2. Annualized measure.
    Adjusted Noninterest Income, Revenue Measures, Adjusted Noninterest Expense, Efficiency Ratios, and Adjusted Noninterest Expense to Average Assets
                         
        Three Months Ended   Six Months Ended
    (dollars in thousands)   June 30,
    2025    		   March 31,
    2025    		   June 30,
    2024    		   June 30,
    2025    		   June 30,
    2024
    Net interest income (GAAP) [a] $ 153,183     $ 103,731     $ 82,532     $ 256,914     $ 158,386  
    Tax-equivalent adjustment1     791       537       402       1,328       851  
    Tax-equivalent net interest income (Non-GAAP) [b]   153,974       104,268       82,934       258,242       159,237  
                         
    Total noninterest income (GAAP)     44,863       21,223       33,703       66,086       68,616  
    Net security (gains) losses     (5,997 )     15,768       353       9,771       6,728  
    Noninterest income excluding net securities gains and losses (Non-GAAP) [c]   38,866       36,991       34,056       75,857       75,344  
    Realized net (gains) losses on the sale of mortgage service rights     —       —       (277 )     —       (7,742 )
    Adjusted noninterest income (Non-GAAP) [d] $ 38,866     $ 36,991     $ 33,779     $ 75,857     $ 67,602  
                         
    Tax-equivalent revenue (Non-GAAP) [e = b+c] $ 192,840     $ 141,259     $ 116,990     $ 334,099     $ 234,581  
    Adjusted tax-equivalent revenue (Non-GAAP) [f = b+d]   192,840       141,259       116,713       334,099       226,839  
    Operating revenue (Non-GAAP) [g = a+d]   192,049       140,722       116,311       332,771       225,988  
                         
    Adjusted noninterest income to operating revenue (Non-GAAP) [d÷g]   20.24 %     26.29 %     29.04 %     22.80 %     29.91 %
                         
    Total noninterest expense (GAAP)2   $ 127,833     $ 112,030     $ 75,906     $ 239,863     $ 147,353  
    Amortization of intangible assets     (4,592 )     (3,083 )     (2,629 )     (7,675 )     (5,038 )
    Noninterest expense excluding amortization of intangible assets (Non-GAAP)2 [h]   123,241       108,947       73,277       232,188       142,315  
    Acquisition and restructuring expenses, excluding initial provision expenses     (16,600 )     (26,026 )     (2,212 )     (42,626 )     (2,620 )
    Adjusted noninterest expense (Non-GAAP)2 [i] $ 106,641     $ 82,921     $ 71,065     $ 189,562     $ 139,695  
                         
    Efficiency ratio (Non-GAAP)2 [h÷e]   63.91 %     77.13 %     62.64 %     69.50 %     60.67 %
    Adjusted efficiency ratio (Non-GAAP)2 [i÷f]   55.30 %     58.70 %     60.89 %     56.74 %     61.58 %
                         
    Average total assets [j] $ 19,068,086     $ 14,831,298     $ 12,089,692     $ 16,961,396     $ 12,056,950  
    Adjusted noninterest expense to average assets (Non-GAAP)2,3 [i÷j]   2.24 %     2.27 %     2.36 %     2.25 %     2.33 %

    ___________________________________________

    1. Tax-equivalent adjustments were calculated using an estimated federal income tax rate of 21%, applied to non-taxable interest income on investments and loans.
    2. Beginning in the second quarter of 2025, Busey revised its presentation, for all periods presented, to reclassify the provision for unfunded commitments so that it is now included within the provision for credit losses; therefore, it is no longer included within total noninterest expense. This change affects all measures and ratios derived from total noninterest expense.
    3. Annualized measure.
    Tangible Assets, Tangible Common Equity, and Related Measures and Ratio
                 
        As of
    (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)   June 30,
    2025    		   March 31,
    2025    		   June 30,
    2024
    Total assets (GAAP)   $ 18,918,740     $ 19,464,252     $ 11,971,416  
    Goodwill and other intangible assets, net     (488,181 )     (496,118 )     (370,580 )
    Tangible assets (Non-GAAP)1 [a] $ 18,430,559     $ 18,968,134     $ 11,600,836  
                 
    Total stockholders’ equity (GAAP)   $ 2,412,546     $ 2,179,606     $ 1,333,810  
    Preferred stock and additional paid in capital on preferred stock     (215,197 )     (7,750 )     —  
    Common equity [b]   2,197,349       2,171,856       1,333,810  
    Goodwill and other intangible assets, net     (488,181 )     (496,118 )     (370,580 )
    Tangible common equity (Non-GAAP)1 [c] $ 1,709,168     $ 1,675,738     $ 963,230  
                 
    Tangible common equity to tangible assets (Non-GAAP)1 [c÷a]   9.27 %     8.83 %     8.30 %
                 
    Ending number of common shares outstanding (GAAP) [d]   89,104,678       90,008,178       56,746,937  
    Book value per common share (Non-GAAP) [b÷d] $ 24.66     $ 24.13     $ 23.50  
    Tangible book value per common share (Non-GAAP) [c÷d] $ 19.18     $ 18.62     $ 16.97  

    ___________________________________________

    1. Beginning in 2025, Busey revised its calculation of tangible assets and tangible common equity for all periods presented to exclude any tax adjustment.
    Core Deposits and Related Ratio
                 
        As of
    (dollars in thousands)   June 30,
    2025    		   March 31,
    2025    		   June 30,
    2024
    Total deposits (GAAP) [a] $ 15,801,772     $ 16,459,470     $ 9,976,135  
    Brokered deposits, excluding brokered time deposits of $250,000 or more     (353,614 )     (722,224 )     (43,089 )
    Time deposits of $250,000 or more     (827,762 )     (867,035 )     (314,461 )
    Core deposits (Non-GAAP) [b] $ 14,620,396     $ 14,870,211     $ 9,618,585  
                 
    Core deposits to total deposits (Non-GAAP) [b÷a]   92.52 %     90.34 %     96.42 %
                             

    FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

    This press release may contain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 with respect to Busey’s financial condition, results of operations, plans, objectives, future performance, and business. Forward-looking statements, which may be based upon beliefs, expectations and assumptions of Busey’s management and on information currently available to management, are generally identifiable by the use of words such as “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “plan,” “intend,” “estimate,” “may,” “will,” “would,” “could,” “should,” “position,” or other similar expressions. Additionally, all statements in this document, including forward-looking statements, speak only as of the date they are made, and Busey undertakes no obligation to update any statement in light of new information or future events.

    A number of factors, many of which are beyond Busey’s ability to control or predict, could cause actual results to differ materially from those in any forward-looking statements. These factors include, among others, the following: (1) the strength of the local, state, national, and international economies and financial markets (including effects of inflationary pressures, the threat or implementation of tariffs, trade wars, and changes to immigration policy); (2) changes in, and the interpretation and prioritization of, local, state, and federal laws, regulations, and governmental policies (including those concerning Busey’s general business); (3) the economic impact of any future terrorist threats or attacks, widespread disease or pandemics, or other adverse external events that could cause economic deterioration or instability in credit markets (including Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and the conflict in the Middle East); (4) unexpected results of acquisitions, including the acquisition of CrossFirst, which may include the failure to realize the anticipated benefits of the acquisitions and the possibility that the transaction and integration costs may be greater than anticipated; (5) the imposition of tariffs or other governmental policies impacting the value of products produced by Busey’s commercial borrowers; (6) new or revised accounting policies and practices as may be adopted by state and federal regulatory banking agencies, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board; (7) changes in interest rates and prepayment rates of Busey’s assets (including the impact of sustained elevated interest rates); (8) increased competition in the financial services sector (including from non-bank competitors such as credit unions and fintech companies) and the inability to attract new customers; (9) technological changes implemented by us and other parties, including our third-party vendors, which may have unforeseen consequences to us and our customers, including the development and implementation of tools incorporating artificial intelligence; (10) the loss of key executives or associates, talent shortages, and employee turnover; (11) unexpected outcomes and costs of existing or new litigation, investigations, or other legal proceedings, inquiries, and regulatory actions involving Busey (including with respect to Busey’s Illinois franchise taxes); (12) fluctuations in the value of securities held in Busey’s securities portfolio, including as a result of changes in interest rates; (13) credit risk and risk from concentrations (by type of borrower, geographic area, collateral, and industry), within Busey’s loan portfolio and large loans to certain borrowers (including commercial real estate loans); (14) the concentration of large deposits from certain clients who have balances above current Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insurance limits and may withdraw deposits to diversify their exposure; (15) the level of non-performing assets on Busey’s balance sheets; (16) interruptions involving information technology and communications systems or third-party servicers; (17) breaches or failures of information security controls or cybersecurity-related incidents; (18) the economic impact on Busey and its customers of climate change, natural disasters, and exceptional weather occurrences such as tornadoes, hurricanes, floods, blizzards, and droughts; (19) the ability to successfully manage liquidity risk, which may increase dependence on non-core funding sources such as brokered deposits, and may negatively impact Busey’s cost of funds; (20) the ability to maintain an adequate level of allowance for credit losses on loans; (21) the effectiveness of Busey’s risk management framework; and (22) the ability of Busey to manage the risks associated with the foregoing. These risks and uncertainties should be considered in evaluating forward-looking statements and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements.

    Additional information concerning Busey and its business, including additional factors that could materially affect Busey’s financial results, is included in Busey’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

    END NOTES

    1 Annualized measure.
    2 Represents a non-GAAP financial measure. For a reconciliation to the most directly comparable financial measure calculated and presented in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”), see “Non-GAAP Financial Information.”
    3 The blended benchmark consists of 60% MSCI All Country World Index and 40% Bloomberg Intermediate US Government/Credit Total Return Index.
    4 Estimated uninsured and uncollateralized deposits consist of account balances in excess of the $250,000 Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insurance limit, less intercompany accounts, fully collateralized accounts (including preferred deposits), and pass-through accounts where clients have deposit insurance at the correspondent financial institution.
    5 On- and off-balance sheet liquidity is comprised of cash and cash equivalents, debt securities excluding those pledged as collateral, brokered deposits, and Busey’s borrowing capacity through its revolving credit facility, the FHLB, the Federal Reserve Bank, and federal funds purchased lines.
    6 Capital amounts and ratios for the second quarter of 2025 are not yet finalized and are subject to change.
       

    INVESTOR CONTACT: Scott A. Phillips, Interim Chief Financial Officer | 239-689-7167

    The MIL Network –

  • MIL-OSI: Baker Hughes Company Announces Second-Quarter 2025 Results

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Second-quarter highlights

    • Orders of $7.0 billion, including $3.5 billion of IET orders.
    • RPO of $34.0 billion, including record IET RPO of $31.3 billion.
    • Revenue of $6.9 billion, down 3% year-over-year.
    • Attributable net income of $701 million.
    • GAAP diluted EPS of $0.71 and adjusted diluted EPS* of $0.63.
    • Adjusted EBITDA* of $1,212 million, up 7% year-over-year.
    • Cash flows from operating activities of $510 million and free cash flow* of $239 million.
    • Returns to shareholders of $423 million, including $196 million of share repurchases.

    HOUSTON and LONDON, July 22, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Baker Hughes Company (Nasdaq: BKR) (“Baker Hughes” or the “Company”) announced results today for the second quarter of 2025.

    “We delivered strong second-quarter results, with total adjusted EBITDA margins increasing 170 basis points year-over-year to 17.5% despite a modest decline in revenue. This performance reflects the benefits of structural cost improvements and continued deployment of our business system, which is driving higher productivity, stronger operating leverage and more durable earnings across the company,” said Lorenzo Simonelli, Baker Hughes Chairman and Chief Executive Officer.

    “IET orders totaled $3.5 billion in the quarter, resulting in another record backlog for the segment. Importantly, order momentum remained strong, supported by more than $550 million of data center related orders, despite the absence of large LNG awards. Following a strong first half and a positive outlook for second half awards, we are confident of achieving the full-year order guidance range for IET.”

    “We remain confident in our ability to deliver solid performance in 2025, with continued growth in IET helping to offset softness in more market-sensitive areas of OFSE – underscoring the strength of our portfolio and the benefits of our strategic diversification. Accordingly, we are raising our full-year revenue and EBITDA guidance for IET and reestablishing full-year guidance for OFSE.”

    “During the quarter, we also announced three strategic transactions to advance our portfolio optimization strategy, reinforcing efforts to enhance the durability of earnings and cash flow while creating long-term value for shareholders. These actions are designed to unlock value from non-core businesses in our portfolio and redeploy that capital into higher-margin opportunities that fit our financial and strategic frameworks.”

    “We are progressing with our strategy of positioning the company for sustainable, differentiated growth and commend the focus and dedication of our people in executing this strategy,” concluded Simonelli.

    * Non-GAAP measure. See reconciliations in the section titled “Reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP Financial Measures.”

        Three Months Ended   Variance
    (in millions except per share amounts)   June 30, 2025 March 31, 2025 June 30, 2024   Sequential Year-over-year
    Orders   $ 7,032   $ 6,459   $ 7,526     9 % (7 %)
    Revenue     6,910     6,427     7,139     8 % (3 %)
    Net income attributable to Baker Hughes     701     402     579     74 % 21 %
    Adjusted net income attributable to Baker Hughes*     623     509     568     22 % 10 %
    Adjusted EBITDA*     1,212     1,037     1,130     17 % 7 %
    Diluted earnings per share (EPS)     0.71     0.40     0.58     76 % 22 %
    Adjusted diluted EPS*     0.63     0.51     0.57     23 % 11 %
    Cash flow from operating activities     510     709     348     (28 %) 47 %
    Free cash flow*     239     454     106     (47 %) F


    * Non-GAAP measure. See reconciliations in the section titled “Reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP Financial Measures.”

    Certain columns and rows in our tables and financial statements may not sum up due to the use of rounded numbers.

    “F” is used in most instances when variance is above 100%. Additionally, “U” is used when variance is below (100)%.

    Quarter Highlights

    Executing our portfolio optimization strategy

    In the second quarter, Baker Hughes announced three strategic transactions, all of which reflect a disciplined capital allocation framework and a focus on core businesses with strong return potential.

    First, the Company signed an agreement to form a joint venture with a subsidiary of Cactus, Inc., contributing the Oilfield Services & Equipment’s (“OFSE“) Surface Pressure Control (“SPC“) product line in exchange for approximately $345 million while maintaining a minority ownership stake.

    Second, the Company announced an agreement to sell the Precision Sensors & Instrumentation (“PSI“) product line within Industrial & Energy Technology (“IET“) to Crane Company for approximately $1.15 billion. These proceeds will enhance the Company’s flexibility to reinvest in higher-growth, higher-return areas that support further margin expansion and improved returns.

    Finally, Baker Hughes agreed to acquire Continental Disc Corporation (“CDC“), a leading provider of pressure management solutions, for approximately $540 million. The CDC acquisition strengthens the IET Industrial Products portfolio with a highly complementary, margin-accretive business that expands the Company’s position in the flow and pressure control market and enhances recurring, lifecycle driven revenue.

    Key awards and technology achievements

    The Company continued to support the development of critical data center projects, with year-to-date data center awards of more than $650 million. IET received an award to supply 30 NovaLT™ turbines, representing our largest data center award to-date. The turbines, alongside other associated Baker Hughes equipment, will deliver up to 500 megawatts (MW) of reliable and efficient power for data center development across various U.S. locations.

    Frontier Infrastructure awarded a contract for NovaLT™ turbines, delivering up to 270 MW of power for its data center projects in Wyoming and Texas. This follows the March 2025 enterprise-wide agreement to accelerate large scale carbon capture and storage (“CCS“) and power solutions.

    Baker Hughes continues to grow the pipeline of future data center opportunities. At the Saudi-U.S. Investment Forum in May, the Company signed an MoU with DataVolt that plans to power data centers globally, including the NEOM project in the Kingdom that intends to utilize Baker Hughes’ multi-fuel NovaLT™ technology solution.

    In addition to growing demand from data center applications, IET experienced increased demand for NovaLT™ turbines in the gas infrastructure sector. During the second quarter, the segment secured an award for four gas turbines to support Aramco’s Master Gas System III pipeline project. Including this award, we have secured a total of $2.9 billion in gas infrastructure equipment orders over the past six quarters.

    Highlighting the durability of IET’s lifecycle model, the segment was awarded several aftermarket services contracts. In Gas Technology Services (“GTS“), the Company secured more than $350 million of Contractual Services Agreements (“CSA“) during the quarter. We signed a maintenance agreement with Belayim Petroleum Company (“Petrobel”) to improve uptime and reliability of critical turbomachinery equipment in Egypt. Also in GTS, we renewed a multi-year service agreement with Oman LNG, including resident engineering support along with digital remote monitoring and diagnostics services delivered through iCenter™.

    The Company gained further traction with New Energy globally, with year-to-date bookings now totaling $1.25 billion. In Climate Technology Solutions (“CTS“), we secured one of our largest CCS orders to-date, providing compression technology for a CCS hub in the Middle East. Also in CTS, we signed a framework agreement with Energinet in Denmark to supply 16 reciprocating compressor packages, supporting an increase in biogas production while driving methane and CO2 emissions reduction for gas infrastructure across the country.

    Industrial Technology continued to demonstrate strong momentum across multiple end markets. In Industrial Solutions, we secured a variety of awards for our Cordant™ suite of solutions. This includes an award from a large NOC to deploy Asset Performance Management across several compression stations in the Middle East, and an award from NOVA Chemicals to optimize maintenance spend and maximize production.

    OFSE maintained strong momentum in Mature Assets Solutions around the globe. In Angola, OFSE was awarded multi-year production solutions contracts for chemicals, artificial lift, and digital services to support a major operator’s offshore activities. In Kazakhstan, the TOPAN and Baker Hughes joint venture secured a critical production chemicals and services award. In Norway, Equinor awarded OFSE a contract to industrialize offshore plug and abandonment (“P&A“) operations in the Oseberg East field, which followed the announcement of a multi-year P&A framework agreement for integrated well services.

    OFSE saw continued adoption of Leucipa™ automated field production solution, securing an award from Repsol for next-generation AI capabilities following the MoU signed in October 2024. The Company also signed an agreement with ENI to deploy Leucipa for electric submersible pumps (“ESP“) optimization and AI-powered predictive failure analytics in the Middle East.

    Also in the Middle East, Baker Hughes signed a master services agreement with Aramco for installation and maintenance of ESPs across the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

    In North America, OFSE secured a multi-year contract to provide drag reducing chemicals to be deployed on Genesis Energy’s Cameron Highway Oil Pipeline and Poseidon systems, each of which is operated and 64% owned by Genesis Energy. To support this agreement, OFSE will expand its chemicals manufacturing footprint and deploy Leucipa. Additionally, bp awarded OFSE a multi-year chemicals management services contract to optimize throughput and asset reliability in the U.S. Gulf Coast.

    In Germany, OFSE successfully drilled Lower Saxony’s first productive deep geothermal exploration well, a project that leverages OFSE’s integrated well construction and production capabilities and the Company’s industry-leading subsurface-to-surface digital solutions to monitor and optimize operational performance.

    Consolidated Financial Results

    Revenue for the quarter was $6,910 million, an increase of 8% sequentially and down $229 million year-over-year. The decrease in revenue year-over-year was driven by a decrease in OFSE partially offset by an increase in IET.

    The Company’s total book-to-bill ratio in the second quarter of 2025 was 1.0; the IET book-to-bill ratio was 1.1.

    Net income as determined in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for the second quarter of 2025 was $701 million. Net income increased $299 million sequentially and increased $122 million year-over-year.

    Adjusted net income (a non-GAAP financial measure) for the second quarter of 2025 was $623 million, which excludes adjustments totaling $78 million. A list of the adjusting items and associated reconciliation from GAAP has been provided in Table 1b in the section titled “Reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP Financial Measures.” Adjusted net income for the second quarter of 2025 was up 22% sequentially and up 10% year-over-year.

    Depreciation and amortization for the second quarter of 2025 was $293 million.

    Adjusted EBITDA (a non-GAAP financial measure) for the second quarter of 2025 was $1,212 million, which excludes adjustments totaling $102 million. See Table 1a in the section titled “Reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP Financial Measures.” Adjusted EBITDA for the second quarter was up 17% sequentially and up 7% year-over-year.

    The sequential increase in adjusted net income and adjusted EBITDA was primarily driven by an increase in volume, favorable FX, and overall productivity. The year-over-year increase in adjusted net income and adjusted EBITDA was driven by productivity and structural cost out initiatives, favorable FX, partially offset by lower volume in OFSE, and cost inflation in both segments.

    Other Financial Items

    Remaining Performance Obligations (“RPO”) in the second quarter of 2025 ended at $34 billion, an increase of $0.8 billion from the first quarter of 2025. OFSE RPO was $2.7 billion, down 3% sequentially, while IET RPO was $31.3 billion, up 3% sequentially. Within IET RPO, GTE RPO was $11.3 billion, and GTS RPO was $15.6 billion.

    Income tax expense in the second quarter of 2025 was $256 million.

    Other (income) expense, net in the second quarter of 2025 was $(134) million, primarily related to changes in fair value for equity securities of $(119) million.

    GAAP diluted earnings per share was $0.71. Adjusted diluted earnings per share (a non-GAAP financial measure) was $0.63. Excluded from adjusted diluted earnings per share were all items listed in Table 1b in the section titled “Reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP Financial Measures.”

    Cash flow from operating activities was $510 million for the second quarter of 2025. Free cash flow (a non-GAAP financial measure) for the quarter was $239 million. A reconciliation from GAAP has been provided in Table 1c in the section titled “Reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP Financial Measures.”

    Capital expenditures, net of proceeds from disposal of assets, were $271 million for the second quarter of 2025, of which $184 million was for OFSE and $68 million was for IET.

    Results by Reporting Segment

    The following segment discussions and variance explanations are intended to reflect management’s view of the relevant comparisons of financial results on a sequential or year-over-year basis, depending on the business dynamics of the reporting segments.

    Oilfield Services & Equipment

    (in millions)   Three Months Ended   Variance
    Segment results   June 30, 2025 March 31, 2025 June 30, 2024   Sequential Year-over-year
    Orders   $ 3,503   $ 3,281   $ 4,068     7 % (14 %)
    Revenue   $ 3,617   $ 3,499   $ 4,011     3 % (10 %)
    EBITDA   $ 677   $ 623   $ 716     9 % (5 %)
    EBITDA margin     18.7 %   17.8 %   17.8 %   0.9pts 0.9pts
    (in millions)   Three Months Ended   Variance
    Revenue by Product Line   June 30, 2025 March 31, 2025 June 30, 2024   Sequential Year-over-year
    Well Construction   $ 921   $ 892   $ 1,090     3 % (16 %)
    Completions, Intervention, and Measurements     935     925     1,118     1 % (16 %)
    Production Solutions     968     899     958     8 % 1 %
    Subsea & Surface Pressure Systems     793     782     845     1 % (6 %)
    Total Revenue   $ 3,617   $ 3,499   $ 4,011     3 % (10 %)
    (in millions)   Three Months Ended   Variance
    Revenue by Geographic Region   June 30, 2025 March 31, 2025 June 30, 2024   Sequential Year-over-year
    North America   $ 928   $ 922   $ 1,023     1 % (9 %)
    Latin America     639     568     663     12 % (4 %)
    Europe/CIS/Sub-Saharan Africa     653     580     827     13 % (21 %)
    Middle East/Asia     1,398     1,429     1,498     (2 %) (7 %)
    Total Revenue   $ 3,617   $ 3,499   $ 4,011     3 % (10 %)
                   
    North America   $ 928   $ 922   $ 1,023     1 % (9 %)
    International   $ 2,689   $ 2,577   $ 2,988     4 % (10 %)


    EBITDA excludes depreciation and amortization of     $233 million, $226 million, and $223 million for the three months ended June 30, 2025, March 31, 2025, and June 30, 2024, respectively. EBITDA margin is defined as EBITDA divided by revenue.

    OFSE orders of $3,503 million for the second quarter of 2025 increased by 7% sequentially. Subsea and Surface Pressure Systems orders were $698 million, up 31% sequentially, and down 21% year-over-year.

    OFSE revenue of $3,617 million for the second quarter of 2025 was up 3% sequentially, and down 10% year-over-year.

    North America revenue was $928 million, up 1% sequentially. International revenue was $2,689 million, up 4% sequentially, with increase in all regions with the exception of Middle East and Asia.

    Segment EBITDA for the second quarter of 2025 was $677 million, an increase of $54 million, or 9% sequentially. The sequential increase in EBITDA was primarily driven by productivity, structural cost-out initiatives, volume increase, partially offset by inflation and revenue mix.

    Industrial & Energy Technology

    (in millions)   Three Months Ended   Variance
    Segment results   June 30, 2025 March 31, 2025 June 30, 2024   Sequential Year-over-year
    Orders   $ 3,530   $ 3,178   $ 3,458     11 % 2 %
    Revenue   $ 3,293   $ 2,928   $ 3,128     12 % 5 %
    EBITDA   $ 585   $ 501   $ 497     17 % 18 %
    EBITDA margin     17.8 %   17.1 %   15.9 %   0.7pts 1.9pts
    (in millions)   Three Months Ended   Variance
    Orders by Product Line   June 30, 2025 March 31, 2025 June 30, 2024   Sequential Year-over-year
    Gas Technology Equipment   $ 781   $ 1,335   $ 1,493     (42 %) (48 %)
    Gas Technology Services     986     913     769     8 % 28 %
    Total Gas Technology     1,767     2,248     2,261     (21 %) (22 %)
    Industrial Products     513     501     524     2 % (2 %)
    Industrial Solutions     327     281     281     16 % 16 %
    Total Industrial Technology     839     782     805     7 % 4 %
    Climate Technology Solutions     923     148     392     F F
    Total Orders   $ 3,530   $ 3,178   $ 3,458     11 % 2 %
    (in millions)   Three Months Ended   Variance
    Revenue by Product Line   June 30, 2025 March 31, 2025 June 30, 2024   Sequential Year-over-year
    Gas Technology Equipment   $ 1,624   $ 1,456   $ 1,539     12 % 6 %
    Gas Technology Services     752     592     691     27 % 9 %
    Total Gas Technology     2,377     2,047     2,230     16 % 7 %
    Industrial Products     488     445     509     10 % (4 %)
    Industrial Solutions     273     258     262     6 % 4 %
    Total Industrial Technology     761     703     770     8 % (1 %)
    Climate Technology Solutions     156     178     128     (12 %) 22 %
    Total Revenue   $ 3,293   $ 2,928   $ 3,128     12 % 5 %


    EBITDA excludes depreciation and amortization of     $56 million, $53 million, and $55 million for the three months ended June 30, 2025, March 31, 2025, and June 30, 2024, respectively. EBITDA margin is defined as EBITDA divided by revenue.

    “F” is used in most instances when variance is above 100%. Additionally, “U” is used when variance is below (100)%.

    IET orders of $3,530 million for the second quarter of 2025 increased by $72 million, or 2% year-over-year. The increase was driven primarily by Climate Technology Solutions and partially offset by Gas Technology.

    IET revenue of $3,293 million for the second quarter of 2025 increased $165 million, or 5% year-over-year. The increase was driven by Gas Technology Equipment, up $85 million or 6% year-over-year, Gas Technology Services, up $61 million or 9% year-over-year, and Climate Technology Solutions, up $28 million or 22% year-over-year.

    Segment EBITDA for the quarter was $585 million, an increase of $88 million, or 18% year-over-year. The year-over-year increase in segment EBITDA was driven by positive pricing, favorable FX, and productivity, partially offset by cost inflation.

    Reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP Financial Measures

    Management provides non-GAAP financial measures because it believes such measures are widely accepted financial indicators used by investors and analysts to analyze and compare companies on the basis of operating performance (including adjusted EBITDA; adjusted net income attributable to Baker Hughes; and adjusted diluted earnings per share) and liquidity (free cash flow) and that these measures may be used by investors to make informed investment decisions. Management believes that the exclusion of certain identified items from several key operating performance measures enables us to evaluate our operations more effectively, to identify underlying trends in the business, and to establish operational goals for certain management compensation purposes. Management also believes that free cash flow is an important supplemental measure of our cash performance but should not be considered as a measure of residual cash flow available for discretionary purposes, or as an alternative to cash flow from operating activities presented in accordance with GAAP.

    Table 1a. Reconciliation of Net Income Attributable to Baker Hughes to Adjusted EBITDA and Segment EBITDA

        Three Months Ended
    (in millions)   June 30, 2025 March 31, 2025 June 30, 2024
    Net income attributable to Baker Hughes (GAAP)   $ 701   $ 402   $ 579  
    Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests     10     7     2  
    Provision for income taxes     256     152     243  
    Interest expense, net     54     51     47  
    Depreciation & amortization     293     285     283  
    Change in fair value of equity securities (1)     (119 )   140     (19 )
    Other charges and credits (1)     17     —     (6 )
    Adjusted EBITDA (non-GAAP)     1,212     1,037     1,130  
    Corporate costs     78     85     83  
    Other (income) / expense not allocated to segments     (28 )   1     —  
    Total Segment EBITDA (non-GAAP)   $ 1,262   $ 1,124   $ 1,213  
    OFSE     677     623     716  
    IET     585     501     497  


    (1)     Change in fair value of equity securities and other charges and credits are reported in “Other (income) expense, net” on the condensed consolidated statements of income (loss).

    Table 1a reconciles net income attributable to Baker Hughes, which is the directly comparable financial result determined in accordance with GAAP, to adjusted EBITDA and Segment EBITDA. Adjusted EBITDA and Segment EBITDA exclude the impact of certain identified items.

    Table 1b. Reconciliation of Net Income Attributable to Baker Hughes to Adjusted Net Income Attributable to Baker Hughes

        Three Months Ended
    (in millions, except per share amounts)   June 30, 2025 March 31, 2025 June 30, 2024
    Net income attributable to Baker Hughes (GAAP)   $ 701   $ 402   $ 579  
    Change in fair value of equity securities     (119 )   140     (19 )
    Other adjustments     17     —     14  
    Tax adjustments(1)     24     (32 )   (6 )
    Total adjustments, net of income tax     (78 )   108     (11 )
    Less: adjustments attributable to noncontrolling interests     —     —     —  
    Adjustments attributable to Baker Hughes     (78 )   108     (11 )
    Adjusted net income attributable to Baker Hughes (non-GAAP)   $ 623   $ 509   $ 568  
             
    Denominator:        
    Weighted-average shares of Class A common stock outstanding diluted     991     999     1,001  
    Adjusted earnings per share – diluted (non-GAAP)   $ 0.63   $ 0.51   $ 0.57  


    (1)     All periods reflect the tax associated with the other (income) loss adjustments.

    Table 1b reconciles net income attributable to Baker Hughes, which is the directly comparable financial result determined in accordance with GAAP, to adjusted net income attributable to Baker Hughes. Adjusted net income attributable to Baker Hughes excludes the impact of certain identified items.

    Table 1c. Reconciliation of Net Cash Flows from Operating Activities to Free Cash Flow

        Three Months Ended
    (in millions)   June 30, 2025 March 31, 2025 June 30, 2024
    Net cash flows from operating activities (GAAP)   $ 510   $ 709   $ 348  
    Add: cash used for capital expenditures, net of proceeds from disposal of assets     (271 )   (255 )   (242 )
    Free cash flow (non-GAAP)   $ 239   $ 454   $ 106  

    Table 1c reconciles net cash flows from operating activities, which is the directly comparable financial result determined in accordance with GAAP, to free cash flow. Free cash flow is defined as net cash flows from operating activities less expenditures for capital assets plus proceeds from disposal of assets.


    Financial Tables (GAAP)

    Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss)
    (Unaudited)
     
        Three Months Ended June 30, Six Months Ended June 30,
    (In millions, except per share amounts)     2025     2024     2025     2024  
    Revenue   $ 6,910   $ 7,139   $ 13,337   $ 13,557  
    Costs and expenses:          
    Cost of revenue     5,295     5,493     10,247     10,469  
    Selling, general and administrative     567     643     1,144     1,261  
    Research and development costs     161     158     307     322  
    Other (income) expense, net     (134 )   (26 )   6     (48 )
    Interest expense, net     54     47     105     88  
    Income before income taxes     967     824     1,528     1,465  
    Provision for income taxes     (256 )   (243 )   (408 )   (421 )
    Net income     711     581     1,120     1,044  
    Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests     10     2     17     10  
    Net income attributable to Baker Hughes Company   $ 701   $ 579   $ 1,103   $ 1,034  
               
    Per share amounts:      
    Basic income per Class A common stock   $ 0.71   $ 0.58   $ 1.11   $ 1.04  
    Diluted income per Class A common stock   $ 0.71   $ 0.58   $ 1.11   $ 1.03  
               
    Weighted average shares:          
    Class A basic     988     996     990     997  
    Class A diluted     991     1,001     995     1,002  
               
    Cash dividend per Class A common stock   $ 0.23   $ 0.21   $ 0.46   $ 0.42  
    Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Position
    (Unaudited)
     
    (In millions)   June 30, 2025 December 31, 2024
    ASSETS
    Current Assets:      
    Cash and cash equivalents   $ 3,087   $ 3,364  
    Current receivables, net     6,511     7,122  
    Inventories, net     5,105     4,954  
    All other current assets     2,915     1,771  
    Total current assets     17,618     17,211  
    Property, plant and equipment, less accumulated depreciation     5,176     5,127  
    Goodwill     5,801     6,078  
    Other intangible assets, net     3,919     3,951  
    Contract and other deferred assets     1,841     1,730  
    All other assets     4,385     4,266  
    Total assets   $ 38,740   $ 38,363  
    LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
    Current Liabilities:      
    Accounts payable   $ 4,340   $ 4,542  
    Short-term debt     66     53  
    Progress collections and deferred income     5,680     5,672  
    All other current liabilities     2,429     2,724  
    Total current liabilities     12,515     12,991  
    Long-term debt     5,968     5,970  
    Liabilities for pensions and other postretirement benefits     997     988  
    All other liabilities     1,392     1,359  
    Equity     17,868     17,055  
    Total liabilities and equity   $ 38,740   $ 38,363  
           
    Outstanding Baker Hughes Company shares:      
    Class A common stock     985     990  
    Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
    (Unaudited)
     
        Three Months Ended June 30, Six Months Ended June 30,
    (In millions)     2025     2025     2024  
    Cash flows from operating activities:        
    Net income   $ 711   $ 1,120   $ 1,044  
    Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flows from operating activities:        
    Depreciation and amortization     293     579     566  
    Stock-based compensation cost     52     102     101  
    Change in fair value of equity securities     (119 )   21     (71 )
    (Benefit) provision for deferred income taxes     36     (17 )   33  
    Working capital     (120 )   98     (36 )
    Other operating items, net     (343 )   (684 )   (505 )
    Net cash flows provided by operating activities     510     1,219     1,132  
    Cash flows from investing activities:        
    Expenditures for capital assets     (301 )   (601 )   (625 )
    Proceeds from disposal of assets     30     74     101  
    Other investing items, net     (15 )   (69 )   (6 )
    Net cash flows used in investing activities     (286 )   (596 )   (530 )
    Cash flows from financing activities:        
    Repayment of long-term debt     —     —     (125 )
    Dividends paid     (227 )   (456 )   (419 )
    Repurchase of Class A common stock     (196 )   (384 )   (324 )
    Other financing items, net     (20 )   (105 )   (61 )
    Net cash flows used in financing activities     (443 )   (945 )   (929 )
    Effect of currency exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents     29     45     (35 )
    Decrease in cash and cash equivalents     (190 )   (277 )   (362 )
    Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period     3,277     3,364     2,646  
    Cash and cash equivalents, end of period   $ 3,087   $ 3,087   $ 2,284  
    Supplemental cash flows disclosures:        
    Income taxes paid, net of refunds   $ 211   $ 418   $ 336  
    Interest paid   $ 98   $ 148   $ 150  


    Supplemental Financial Information

    Supplemental financial information can be found on the Company’s website at: investors.bakerhughes.com in the Financial Information section under Quarterly Results.

    Conference Call and Webcast

    The Company has scheduled an investor conference call to discuss management’s outlook and the results reported in today’s earnings announcement. The call will begin at 9:30 a.m. Eastern time, 8:30 a.m. Central time on Wednesday, July 23, 2025, the content of which is not part of this earnings release. The conference call will be broadcast live via a webcast and can be accessed by visiting the Events and Presentations page on the Company’s website at: investors.bakerhughes.com. An archived version of the webcast will be available on the website for one month following the webcast.

    Forward-Looking Statements

    This news release (and oral statements made regarding the subjects of this release) may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (each a “forward-looking statement”). Forward-looking statements concern future circumstances and results and other statements that are not historical facts and are sometimes identified by the words “may,” “will,” “should,” “potential,” “intend,” “expect,” “would,” “seek,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “overestimate,” “underestimate,” “believe,” “could,” “project,” “predict,” “continue,” “target,” “goal” or other similar words or expressions. There are many risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from our forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are also affected by the risk factors described in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31, 2024 and those set forth from time to time in other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The documents are available through the Company’s website at: www.investors.bakerhughes.com or through the SEC’s Electronic Data Gathering and Analysis Retrieval system at: www.sec.gov. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement, except as required by law. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any of these forward-looking statements.

    Our expectations regarding our business outlook and business plans; the business plans of our customers; oil and natural gas market conditions; cost and availability of resources; economic, legal and regulatory conditions, and other matters are only our forecasts regarding these matters.

    These forward-looking statements, including forecasts, may be substantially different from actual results, which are affected by many risks, along with the following risk factors and the timing of any of these risk factors:

    • Economic and political conditions – the impact of worldwide economic conditions and rising inflation; the impact of tariffs and the potential for significant increases thereto; the impact of global trade policy and the potential for significant changes thereto; the effect that declines in credit availability may have on worldwide economic growth and demand for hydrocarbons; foreign currency exchange fluctuations and changes in the capital markets in locations where we operate; and the impact of government disruptions and sanctions.
    • Orders and RPO – our ability to execute on orders and RPO in accordance with agreed specifications, terms and conditions and convert those orders and RPO to revenue and cash.
    • Oil and gas market conditions – the level of petroleum industry exploration, development and production expenditures; the price of, volatility in pricing of, and the demand for crude oil and natural gas; drilling activity; drilling permits for and regulation of the shelf and the deepwater drilling; excess productive capacity; crude and product inventories; liquefied natural gas supply and demand; seasonal and other adverse weather conditions that affect the demand for energy; severe weather conditions, such as tornadoes and hurricanes, that affect exploration and production activities; Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (“OPEC”) policy and the adherence by OPEC nations to their OPEC production quotas.
    • Terrorism and geopolitical risks – war, military action, terrorist activities or extended periods of international conflict, particularly involving any petroleum-producing or consuming regions, including Russia and Ukraine; and the recent conflict in the Middle East; labor disruptions, civil unrest or security conditions where we operate; potentially burdensome taxation, expropriation of assets by governmental action; cybersecurity risks and cyber incidents or attacks; epidemic outbreaks.

    About Baker Hughes:

    Baker Hughes (Nasdaq: BKR) is an energy technology company that provides solutions to energy and industrial customers worldwide. Built on a century of experience and conducting business in over 120 countries, our innovative technologies and services are taking energy forward – making it safer, cleaner and more efficient for people and the planet. Visit us at bakerhughes.com.

    For more information, please contact:

    Investor Relations

    Chase Mulvehill
    +1 346-297-2561
    investor.relations@bakerhughes.com

    Media Relations

    Adrienne M. Lynch
    +1 713-906-8407
    adrienne.lynch@bakerhughes.com

    The MIL Network –

  • MIL-OSI: Baker Hughes Company Announces Second-Quarter 2025 Results

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Second-quarter highlights

    • Orders of $7.0 billion, including $3.5 billion of IET orders.
    • RPO of $34.0 billion, including record IET RPO of $31.3 billion.
    • Revenue of $6.9 billion, down 3% year-over-year.
    • Attributable net income of $701 million.
    • GAAP diluted EPS of $0.71 and adjusted diluted EPS* of $0.63.
    • Adjusted EBITDA* of $1,212 million, up 7% year-over-year.
    • Cash flows from operating activities of $510 million and free cash flow* of $239 million.
    • Returns to shareholders of $423 million, including $196 million of share repurchases.

    HOUSTON and LONDON, July 22, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Baker Hughes Company (Nasdaq: BKR) (“Baker Hughes” or the “Company”) announced results today for the second quarter of 2025.

    “We delivered strong second-quarter results, with total adjusted EBITDA margins increasing 170 basis points year-over-year to 17.5% despite a modest decline in revenue. This performance reflects the benefits of structural cost improvements and continued deployment of our business system, which is driving higher productivity, stronger operating leverage and more durable earnings across the company,” said Lorenzo Simonelli, Baker Hughes Chairman and Chief Executive Officer.

    “IET orders totaled $3.5 billion in the quarter, resulting in another record backlog for the segment. Importantly, order momentum remained strong, supported by more than $550 million of data center related orders, despite the absence of large LNG awards. Following a strong first half and a positive outlook for second half awards, we are confident of achieving the full-year order guidance range for IET.”

    “We remain confident in our ability to deliver solid performance in 2025, with continued growth in IET helping to offset softness in more market-sensitive areas of OFSE – underscoring the strength of our portfolio and the benefits of our strategic diversification. Accordingly, we are raising our full-year revenue and EBITDA guidance for IET and reestablishing full-year guidance for OFSE.”

    “During the quarter, we also announced three strategic transactions to advance our portfolio optimization strategy, reinforcing efforts to enhance the durability of earnings and cash flow while creating long-term value for shareholders. These actions are designed to unlock value from non-core businesses in our portfolio and redeploy that capital into higher-margin opportunities that fit our financial and strategic frameworks.”

    “We are progressing with our strategy of positioning the company for sustainable, differentiated growth and commend the focus and dedication of our people in executing this strategy,” concluded Simonelli.

    * Non-GAAP measure. See reconciliations in the section titled “Reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP Financial Measures.”

        Three Months Ended   Variance
    (in millions except per share amounts)   June 30, 2025 March 31, 2025 June 30, 2024   Sequential Year-over-year
    Orders   $ 7,032   $ 6,459   $ 7,526     9 % (7 %)
    Revenue     6,910     6,427     7,139     8 % (3 %)
    Net income attributable to Baker Hughes     701     402     579     74 % 21 %
    Adjusted net income attributable to Baker Hughes*     623     509     568     22 % 10 %
    Adjusted EBITDA*     1,212     1,037     1,130     17 % 7 %
    Diluted earnings per share (EPS)     0.71     0.40     0.58     76 % 22 %
    Adjusted diluted EPS*     0.63     0.51     0.57     23 % 11 %
    Cash flow from operating activities     510     709     348     (28 %) 47 %
    Free cash flow*     239     454     106     (47 %) F


    * Non-GAAP measure. See reconciliations in the section titled “Reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP Financial Measures.”

    Certain columns and rows in our tables and financial statements may not sum up due to the use of rounded numbers.

    “F” is used in most instances when variance is above 100%. Additionally, “U” is used when variance is below (100)%.

    Quarter Highlights

    Executing our portfolio optimization strategy

    In the second quarter, Baker Hughes announced three strategic transactions, all of which reflect a disciplined capital allocation framework and a focus on core businesses with strong return potential.

    First, the Company signed an agreement to form a joint venture with a subsidiary of Cactus, Inc., contributing the Oilfield Services & Equipment’s (“OFSE“) Surface Pressure Control (“SPC“) product line in exchange for approximately $345 million while maintaining a minority ownership stake.

    Second, the Company announced an agreement to sell the Precision Sensors & Instrumentation (“PSI“) product line within Industrial & Energy Technology (“IET“) to Crane Company for approximately $1.15 billion. These proceeds will enhance the Company’s flexibility to reinvest in higher-growth, higher-return areas that support further margin expansion and improved returns.

    Finally, Baker Hughes agreed to acquire Continental Disc Corporation (“CDC“), a leading provider of pressure management solutions, for approximately $540 million. The CDC acquisition strengthens the IET Industrial Products portfolio with a highly complementary, margin-accretive business that expands the Company’s position in the flow and pressure control market and enhances recurring, lifecycle driven revenue.

    Key awards and technology achievements

    The Company continued to support the development of critical data center projects, with year-to-date data center awards of more than $650 million. IET received an award to supply 30 NovaLT™ turbines, representing our largest data center award to-date. The turbines, alongside other associated Baker Hughes equipment, will deliver up to 500 megawatts (MW) of reliable and efficient power for data center development across various U.S. locations.

    Frontier Infrastructure awarded a contract for NovaLT™ turbines, delivering up to 270 MW of power for its data center projects in Wyoming and Texas. This follows the March 2025 enterprise-wide agreement to accelerate large scale carbon capture and storage (“CCS“) and power solutions.

    Baker Hughes continues to grow the pipeline of future data center opportunities. At the Saudi-U.S. Investment Forum in May, the Company signed an MoU with DataVolt that plans to power data centers globally, including the NEOM project in the Kingdom that intends to utilize Baker Hughes’ multi-fuel NovaLT™ technology solution.

    In addition to growing demand from data center applications, IET experienced increased demand for NovaLT™ turbines in the gas infrastructure sector. During the second quarter, the segment secured an award for four gas turbines to support Aramco’s Master Gas System III pipeline project. Including this award, we have secured a total of $2.9 billion in gas infrastructure equipment orders over the past six quarters.

    Highlighting the durability of IET’s lifecycle model, the segment was awarded several aftermarket services contracts. In Gas Technology Services (“GTS“), the Company secured more than $350 million of Contractual Services Agreements (“CSA“) during the quarter. We signed a maintenance agreement with Belayim Petroleum Company (“Petrobel”) to improve uptime and reliability of critical turbomachinery equipment in Egypt. Also in GTS, we renewed a multi-year service agreement with Oman LNG, including resident engineering support along with digital remote monitoring and diagnostics services delivered through iCenter™.

    The Company gained further traction with New Energy globally, with year-to-date bookings now totaling $1.25 billion. In Climate Technology Solutions (“CTS“), we secured one of our largest CCS orders to-date, providing compression technology for a CCS hub in the Middle East. Also in CTS, we signed a framework agreement with Energinet in Denmark to supply 16 reciprocating compressor packages, supporting an increase in biogas production while driving methane and CO2 emissions reduction for gas infrastructure across the country.

    Industrial Technology continued to demonstrate strong momentum across multiple end markets. In Industrial Solutions, we secured a variety of awards for our Cordant™ suite of solutions. This includes an award from a large NOC to deploy Asset Performance Management across several compression stations in the Middle East, and an award from NOVA Chemicals to optimize maintenance spend and maximize production.

    OFSE maintained strong momentum in Mature Assets Solutions around the globe. In Angola, OFSE was awarded multi-year production solutions contracts for chemicals, artificial lift, and digital services to support a major operator’s offshore activities. In Kazakhstan, the TOPAN and Baker Hughes joint venture secured a critical production chemicals and services award. In Norway, Equinor awarded OFSE a contract to industrialize offshore plug and abandonment (“P&A“) operations in the Oseberg East field, which followed the announcement of a multi-year P&A framework agreement for integrated well services.

    OFSE saw continued adoption of Leucipa™ automated field production solution, securing an award from Repsol for next-generation AI capabilities following the MoU signed in October 2024. The Company also signed an agreement with ENI to deploy Leucipa for electric submersible pumps (“ESP“) optimization and AI-powered predictive failure analytics in the Middle East.

    Also in the Middle East, Baker Hughes signed a master services agreement with Aramco for installation and maintenance of ESPs across the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

    In North America, OFSE secured a multi-year contract to provide drag reducing chemicals to be deployed on Genesis Energy’s Cameron Highway Oil Pipeline and Poseidon systems, each of which is operated and 64% owned by Genesis Energy. To support this agreement, OFSE will expand its chemicals manufacturing footprint and deploy Leucipa. Additionally, bp awarded OFSE a multi-year chemicals management services contract to optimize throughput and asset reliability in the U.S. Gulf Coast.

    In Germany, OFSE successfully drilled Lower Saxony’s first productive deep geothermal exploration well, a project that leverages OFSE’s integrated well construction and production capabilities and the Company’s industry-leading subsurface-to-surface digital solutions to monitor and optimize operational performance.

    Consolidated Financial Results

    Revenue for the quarter was $6,910 million, an increase of 8% sequentially and down $229 million year-over-year. The decrease in revenue year-over-year was driven by a decrease in OFSE partially offset by an increase in IET.

    The Company’s total book-to-bill ratio in the second quarter of 2025 was 1.0; the IET book-to-bill ratio was 1.1.

    Net income as determined in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for the second quarter of 2025 was $701 million. Net income increased $299 million sequentially and increased $122 million year-over-year.

    Adjusted net income (a non-GAAP financial measure) for the second quarter of 2025 was $623 million, which excludes adjustments totaling $78 million. A list of the adjusting items and associated reconciliation from GAAP has been provided in Table 1b in the section titled “Reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP Financial Measures.” Adjusted net income for the second quarter of 2025 was up 22% sequentially and up 10% year-over-year.

    Depreciation and amortization for the second quarter of 2025 was $293 million.

    Adjusted EBITDA (a non-GAAP financial measure) for the second quarter of 2025 was $1,212 million, which excludes adjustments totaling $102 million. See Table 1a in the section titled “Reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP Financial Measures.” Adjusted EBITDA for the second quarter was up 17% sequentially and up 7% year-over-year.

    The sequential increase in adjusted net income and adjusted EBITDA was primarily driven by an increase in volume, favorable FX, and overall productivity. The year-over-year increase in adjusted net income and adjusted EBITDA was driven by productivity and structural cost out initiatives, favorable FX, partially offset by lower volume in OFSE, and cost inflation in both segments.

    Other Financial Items

    Remaining Performance Obligations (“RPO”) in the second quarter of 2025 ended at $34 billion, an increase of $0.8 billion from the first quarter of 2025. OFSE RPO was $2.7 billion, down 3% sequentially, while IET RPO was $31.3 billion, up 3% sequentially. Within IET RPO, GTE RPO was $11.3 billion, and GTS RPO was $15.6 billion.

    Income tax expense in the second quarter of 2025 was $256 million.

    Other (income) expense, net in the second quarter of 2025 was $(134) million, primarily related to changes in fair value for equity securities of $(119) million.

    GAAP diluted earnings per share was $0.71. Adjusted diluted earnings per share (a non-GAAP financial measure) was $0.63. Excluded from adjusted diluted earnings per share were all items listed in Table 1b in the section titled “Reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP Financial Measures.”

    Cash flow from operating activities was $510 million for the second quarter of 2025. Free cash flow (a non-GAAP financial measure) for the quarter was $239 million. A reconciliation from GAAP has been provided in Table 1c in the section titled “Reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP Financial Measures.”

    Capital expenditures, net of proceeds from disposal of assets, were $271 million for the second quarter of 2025, of which $184 million was for OFSE and $68 million was for IET.

    Results by Reporting Segment

    The following segment discussions and variance explanations are intended to reflect management’s view of the relevant comparisons of financial results on a sequential or year-over-year basis, depending on the business dynamics of the reporting segments.

    Oilfield Services & Equipment

    (in millions)   Three Months Ended   Variance
    Segment results   June 30, 2025 March 31, 2025 June 30, 2024   Sequential Year-over-year
    Orders   $ 3,503   $ 3,281   $ 4,068     7 % (14 %)
    Revenue   $ 3,617   $ 3,499   $ 4,011     3 % (10 %)
    EBITDA   $ 677   $ 623   $ 716     9 % (5 %)
    EBITDA margin     18.7 %   17.8 %   17.8 %   0.9pts 0.9pts
    (in millions)   Three Months Ended   Variance
    Revenue by Product Line   June 30, 2025 March 31, 2025 June 30, 2024   Sequential Year-over-year
    Well Construction   $ 921   $ 892   $ 1,090     3 % (16 %)
    Completions, Intervention, and Measurements     935     925     1,118     1 % (16 %)
    Production Solutions     968     899     958     8 % 1 %
    Subsea & Surface Pressure Systems     793     782     845     1 % (6 %)
    Total Revenue   $ 3,617   $ 3,499   $ 4,011     3 % (10 %)
    (in millions)   Three Months Ended   Variance
    Revenue by Geographic Region   June 30, 2025 March 31, 2025 June 30, 2024   Sequential Year-over-year
    North America   $ 928   $ 922   $ 1,023     1 % (9 %)
    Latin America     639     568     663     12 % (4 %)
    Europe/CIS/Sub-Saharan Africa     653     580     827     13 % (21 %)
    Middle East/Asia     1,398     1,429     1,498     (2 %) (7 %)
    Total Revenue   $ 3,617   $ 3,499   $ 4,011     3 % (10 %)
                   
    North America   $ 928   $ 922   $ 1,023     1 % (9 %)
    International   $ 2,689   $ 2,577   $ 2,988     4 % (10 %)


    EBITDA excludes depreciation and amortization of     $233 million, $226 million, and $223 million for the three months ended June 30, 2025, March 31, 2025, and June 30, 2024, respectively. EBITDA margin is defined as EBITDA divided by revenue.

    OFSE orders of $3,503 million for the second quarter of 2025 increased by 7% sequentially. Subsea and Surface Pressure Systems orders were $698 million, up 31% sequentially, and down 21% year-over-year.

    OFSE revenue of $3,617 million for the second quarter of 2025 was up 3% sequentially, and down 10% year-over-year.

    North America revenue was $928 million, up 1% sequentially. International revenue was $2,689 million, up 4% sequentially, with increase in all regions with the exception of Middle East and Asia.

    Segment EBITDA for the second quarter of 2025 was $677 million, an increase of $54 million, or 9% sequentially. The sequential increase in EBITDA was primarily driven by productivity, structural cost-out initiatives, volume increase, partially offset by inflation and revenue mix.

    Industrial & Energy Technology

    (in millions)   Three Months Ended   Variance
    Segment results   June 30, 2025 March 31, 2025 June 30, 2024   Sequential Year-over-year
    Orders   $ 3,530   $ 3,178   $ 3,458     11 % 2 %
    Revenue   $ 3,293   $ 2,928   $ 3,128     12 % 5 %
    EBITDA   $ 585   $ 501   $ 497     17 % 18 %
    EBITDA margin     17.8 %   17.1 %   15.9 %   0.7pts 1.9pts
    (in millions)   Three Months Ended   Variance
    Orders by Product Line   June 30, 2025 March 31, 2025 June 30, 2024   Sequential Year-over-year
    Gas Technology Equipment   $ 781   $ 1,335   $ 1,493     (42 %) (48 %)
    Gas Technology Services     986     913     769     8 % 28 %
    Total Gas Technology     1,767     2,248     2,261     (21 %) (22 %)
    Industrial Products     513     501     524     2 % (2 %)
    Industrial Solutions     327     281     281     16 % 16 %
    Total Industrial Technology     839     782     805     7 % 4 %
    Climate Technology Solutions     923     148     392     F F
    Total Orders   $ 3,530   $ 3,178   $ 3,458     11 % 2 %
    (in millions)   Three Months Ended   Variance
    Revenue by Product Line   June 30, 2025 March 31, 2025 June 30, 2024   Sequential Year-over-year
    Gas Technology Equipment   $ 1,624   $ 1,456   $ 1,539     12 % 6 %
    Gas Technology Services     752     592     691     27 % 9 %
    Total Gas Technology     2,377     2,047     2,230     16 % 7 %
    Industrial Products     488     445     509     10 % (4 %)
    Industrial Solutions     273     258     262     6 % 4 %
    Total Industrial Technology     761     703     770     8 % (1 %)
    Climate Technology Solutions     156     178     128     (12 %) 22 %
    Total Revenue   $ 3,293   $ 2,928   $ 3,128     12 % 5 %


    EBITDA excludes depreciation and amortization of     $56 million, $53 million, and $55 million for the three months ended June 30, 2025, March 31, 2025, and June 30, 2024, respectively. EBITDA margin is defined as EBITDA divided by revenue.

    “F” is used in most instances when variance is above 100%. Additionally, “U” is used when variance is below (100)%.

    IET orders of $3,530 million for the second quarter of 2025 increased by $72 million, or 2% year-over-year. The increase was driven primarily by Climate Technology Solutions and partially offset by Gas Technology.

    IET revenue of $3,293 million for the second quarter of 2025 increased $165 million, or 5% year-over-year. The increase was driven by Gas Technology Equipment, up $85 million or 6% year-over-year, Gas Technology Services, up $61 million or 9% year-over-year, and Climate Technology Solutions, up $28 million or 22% year-over-year.

    Segment EBITDA for the quarter was $585 million, an increase of $88 million, or 18% year-over-year. The year-over-year increase in segment EBITDA was driven by positive pricing, favorable FX, and productivity, partially offset by cost inflation.

    Reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP Financial Measures

    Management provides non-GAAP financial measures because it believes such measures are widely accepted financial indicators used by investors and analysts to analyze and compare companies on the basis of operating performance (including adjusted EBITDA; adjusted net income attributable to Baker Hughes; and adjusted diluted earnings per share) and liquidity (free cash flow) and that these measures may be used by investors to make informed investment decisions. Management believes that the exclusion of certain identified items from several key operating performance measures enables us to evaluate our operations more effectively, to identify underlying trends in the business, and to establish operational goals for certain management compensation purposes. Management also believes that free cash flow is an important supplemental measure of our cash performance but should not be considered as a measure of residual cash flow available for discretionary purposes, or as an alternative to cash flow from operating activities presented in accordance with GAAP.

    Table 1a. Reconciliation of Net Income Attributable to Baker Hughes to Adjusted EBITDA and Segment EBITDA

        Three Months Ended
    (in millions)   June 30, 2025 March 31, 2025 June 30, 2024
    Net income attributable to Baker Hughes (GAAP)   $ 701   $ 402   $ 579  
    Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests     10     7     2  
    Provision for income taxes     256     152     243  
    Interest expense, net     54     51     47  
    Depreciation & amortization     293     285     283  
    Change in fair value of equity securities (1)     (119 )   140     (19 )
    Other charges and credits (1)     17     —     (6 )
    Adjusted EBITDA (non-GAAP)     1,212     1,037     1,130  
    Corporate costs     78     85     83  
    Other (income) / expense not allocated to segments     (28 )   1     —  
    Total Segment EBITDA (non-GAAP)   $ 1,262   $ 1,124   $ 1,213  
    OFSE     677     623     716  
    IET     585     501     497  


    (1)     Change in fair value of equity securities and other charges and credits are reported in “Other (income) expense, net” on the condensed consolidated statements of income (loss).

    Table 1a reconciles net income attributable to Baker Hughes, which is the directly comparable financial result determined in accordance with GAAP, to adjusted EBITDA and Segment EBITDA. Adjusted EBITDA and Segment EBITDA exclude the impact of certain identified items.

    Table 1b. Reconciliation of Net Income Attributable to Baker Hughes to Adjusted Net Income Attributable to Baker Hughes

        Three Months Ended
    (in millions, except per share amounts)   June 30, 2025 March 31, 2025 June 30, 2024
    Net income attributable to Baker Hughes (GAAP)   $ 701   $ 402   $ 579  
    Change in fair value of equity securities     (119 )   140     (19 )
    Other adjustments     17     —     14  
    Tax adjustments(1)     24     (32 )   (6 )
    Total adjustments, net of income tax     (78 )   108     (11 )
    Less: adjustments attributable to noncontrolling interests     —     —     —  
    Adjustments attributable to Baker Hughes     (78 )   108     (11 )
    Adjusted net income attributable to Baker Hughes (non-GAAP)   $ 623   $ 509   $ 568  
             
    Denominator:        
    Weighted-average shares of Class A common stock outstanding diluted     991     999     1,001  
    Adjusted earnings per share – diluted (non-GAAP)   $ 0.63   $ 0.51   $ 0.57  


    (1)     All periods reflect the tax associated with the other (income) loss adjustments.

    Table 1b reconciles net income attributable to Baker Hughes, which is the directly comparable financial result determined in accordance with GAAP, to adjusted net income attributable to Baker Hughes. Adjusted net income attributable to Baker Hughes excludes the impact of certain identified items.

    Table 1c. Reconciliation of Net Cash Flows from Operating Activities to Free Cash Flow

        Three Months Ended
    (in millions)   June 30, 2025 March 31, 2025 June 30, 2024
    Net cash flows from operating activities (GAAP)   $ 510   $ 709   $ 348  
    Add: cash used for capital expenditures, net of proceeds from disposal of assets     (271 )   (255 )   (242 )
    Free cash flow (non-GAAP)   $ 239   $ 454   $ 106  

    Table 1c reconciles net cash flows from operating activities, which is the directly comparable financial result determined in accordance with GAAP, to free cash flow. Free cash flow is defined as net cash flows from operating activities less expenditures for capital assets plus proceeds from disposal of assets.


    Financial Tables (GAAP)

    Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss)
    (Unaudited)
     
        Three Months Ended June 30, Six Months Ended June 30,
    (In millions, except per share amounts)     2025     2024     2025     2024  
    Revenue   $ 6,910   $ 7,139   $ 13,337   $ 13,557  
    Costs and expenses:          
    Cost of revenue     5,295     5,493     10,247     10,469  
    Selling, general and administrative     567     643     1,144     1,261  
    Research and development costs     161     158     307     322  
    Other (income) expense, net     (134 )   (26 )   6     (48 )
    Interest expense, net     54     47     105     88  
    Income before income taxes     967     824     1,528     1,465  
    Provision for income taxes     (256 )   (243 )   (408 )   (421 )
    Net income     711     581     1,120     1,044  
    Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests     10     2     17     10  
    Net income attributable to Baker Hughes Company   $ 701   $ 579   $ 1,103   $ 1,034  
               
    Per share amounts:      
    Basic income per Class A common stock   $ 0.71   $ 0.58   $ 1.11   $ 1.04  
    Diluted income per Class A common stock   $ 0.71   $ 0.58   $ 1.11   $ 1.03  
               
    Weighted average shares:          
    Class A basic     988     996     990     997  
    Class A diluted     991     1,001     995     1,002  
               
    Cash dividend per Class A common stock   $ 0.23   $ 0.21   $ 0.46   $ 0.42  
    Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Position
    (Unaudited)
     
    (In millions)   June 30, 2025 December 31, 2024
    ASSETS
    Current Assets:      
    Cash and cash equivalents   $ 3,087   $ 3,364  
    Current receivables, net     6,511     7,122  
    Inventories, net     5,105     4,954  
    All other current assets     2,915     1,771  
    Total current assets     17,618     17,211  
    Property, plant and equipment, less accumulated depreciation     5,176     5,127  
    Goodwill     5,801     6,078  
    Other intangible assets, net     3,919     3,951  
    Contract and other deferred assets     1,841     1,730  
    All other assets     4,385     4,266  
    Total assets   $ 38,740   $ 38,363  
    LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
    Current Liabilities:      
    Accounts payable   $ 4,340   $ 4,542  
    Short-term debt     66     53  
    Progress collections and deferred income     5,680     5,672  
    All other current liabilities     2,429     2,724  
    Total current liabilities     12,515     12,991  
    Long-term debt     5,968     5,970  
    Liabilities for pensions and other postretirement benefits     997     988  
    All other liabilities     1,392     1,359  
    Equity     17,868     17,055  
    Total liabilities and equity   $ 38,740   $ 38,363  
           
    Outstanding Baker Hughes Company shares:      
    Class A common stock     985     990  
    Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
    (Unaudited)
     
        Three Months Ended June 30, Six Months Ended June 30,
    (In millions)     2025     2025     2024  
    Cash flows from operating activities:        
    Net income   $ 711   $ 1,120   $ 1,044  
    Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flows from operating activities:        
    Depreciation and amortization     293     579     566  
    Stock-based compensation cost     52     102     101  
    Change in fair value of equity securities     (119 )   21     (71 )
    (Benefit) provision for deferred income taxes     36     (17 )   33  
    Working capital     (120 )   98     (36 )
    Other operating items, net     (343 )   (684 )   (505 )
    Net cash flows provided by operating activities     510     1,219     1,132  
    Cash flows from investing activities:        
    Expenditures for capital assets     (301 )   (601 )   (625 )
    Proceeds from disposal of assets     30     74     101  
    Other investing items, net     (15 )   (69 )   (6 )
    Net cash flows used in investing activities     (286 )   (596 )   (530 )
    Cash flows from financing activities:        
    Repayment of long-term debt     —     —     (125 )
    Dividends paid     (227 )   (456 )   (419 )
    Repurchase of Class A common stock     (196 )   (384 )   (324 )
    Other financing items, net     (20 )   (105 )   (61 )
    Net cash flows used in financing activities     (443 )   (945 )   (929 )
    Effect of currency exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents     29     45     (35 )
    Decrease in cash and cash equivalents     (190 )   (277 )   (362 )
    Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period     3,277     3,364     2,646  
    Cash and cash equivalents, end of period   $ 3,087   $ 3,087   $ 2,284  
    Supplemental cash flows disclosures:        
    Income taxes paid, net of refunds   $ 211   $ 418   $ 336  
    Interest paid   $ 98   $ 148   $ 150  


    Supplemental Financial Information

    Supplemental financial information can be found on the Company’s website at: investors.bakerhughes.com in the Financial Information section under Quarterly Results.

    Conference Call and Webcast

    The Company has scheduled an investor conference call to discuss management’s outlook and the results reported in today’s earnings announcement. The call will begin at 9:30 a.m. Eastern time, 8:30 a.m. Central time on Wednesday, July 23, 2025, the content of which is not part of this earnings release. The conference call will be broadcast live via a webcast and can be accessed by visiting the Events and Presentations page on the Company’s website at: investors.bakerhughes.com. An archived version of the webcast will be available on the website for one month following the webcast.

    Forward-Looking Statements

    This news release (and oral statements made regarding the subjects of this release) may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (each a “forward-looking statement”). Forward-looking statements concern future circumstances and results and other statements that are not historical facts and are sometimes identified by the words “may,” “will,” “should,” “potential,” “intend,” “expect,” “would,” “seek,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “overestimate,” “underestimate,” “believe,” “could,” “project,” “predict,” “continue,” “target,” “goal” or other similar words or expressions. There are many risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from our forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are also affected by the risk factors described in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31, 2024 and those set forth from time to time in other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The documents are available through the Company’s website at: www.investors.bakerhughes.com or through the SEC’s Electronic Data Gathering and Analysis Retrieval system at: www.sec.gov. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement, except as required by law. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any of these forward-looking statements.

    Our expectations regarding our business outlook and business plans; the business plans of our customers; oil and natural gas market conditions; cost and availability of resources; economic, legal and regulatory conditions, and other matters are only our forecasts regarding these matters.

    These forward-looking statements, including forecasts, may be substantially different from actual results, which are affected by many risks, along with the following risk factors and the timing of any of these risk factors:

    • Economic and political conditions – the impact of worldwide economic conditions and rising inflation; the impact of tariffs and the potential for significant increases thereto; the impact of global trade policy and the potential for significant changes thereto; the effect that declines in credit availability may have on worldwide economic growth and demand for hydrocarbons; foreign currency exchange fluctuations and changes in the capital markets in locations where we operate; and the impact of government disruptions and sanctions.
    • Orders and RPO – our ability to execute on orders and RPO in accordance with agreed specifications, terms and conditions and convert those orders and RPO to revenue and cash.
    • Oil and gas market conditions – the level of petroleum industry exploration, development and production expenditures; the price of, volatility in pricing of, and the demand for crude oil and natural gas; drilling activity; drilling permits for and regulation of the shelf and the deepwater drilling; excess productive capacity; crude and product inventories; liquefied natural gas supply and demand; seasonal and other adverse weather conditions that affect the demand for energy; severe weather conditions, such as tornadoes and hurricanes, that affect exploration and production activities; Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (“OPEC”) policy and the adherence by OPEC nations to their OPEC production quotas.
    • Terrorism and geopolitical risks – war, military action, terrorist activities or extended periods of international conflict, particularly involving any petroleum-producing or consuming regions, including Russia and Ukraine; and the recent conflict in the Middle East; labor disruptions, civil unrest or security conditions where we operate; potentially burdensome taxation, expropriation of assets by governmental action; cybersecurity risks and cyber incidents or attacks; epidemic outbreaks.

    About Baker Hughes:

    Baker Hughes (Nasdaq: BKR) is an energy technology company that provides solutions to energy and industrial customers worldwide. Built on a century of experience and conducting business in over 120 countries, our innovative technologies and services are taking energy forward – making it safer, cleaner and more efficient for people and the planet. Visit us at bakerhughes.com.

    For more information, please contact:

    Investor Relations

    Chase Mulvehill
    +1 346-297-2561
    investor.relations@bakerhughes.com

    Media Relations

    Adrienne M. Lynch
    +1 713-906-8407
    adrienne.lynch@bakerhughes.com

    The MIL Network –

  • MIL-OSI: Weatherford Announces Second Quarter 2025 Results

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    • Second quarter revenue of $1,204 million increased 1% sequentially
    • Second quarter operating income of $237 million increased 67% sequentially
    • Second quarter net income of $136 million increased 79% sequentially; net income margin of 11.3%
    • Second quarter adjusted EBITDA* of $254 million was flat sequentially; adjusted EBITDA margin* of 21.1% decreased 11 basis points sequentially
    • Second quarter cash provided by operating activities of $128 million and adjusted free cash flow* of $79 million
    • Repurchased $27 million of 8.625% Senior Notes due 2030 in the second quarter of 2025
    • Shareholder return of $52 million for the quarter, which included dividend payments of $18 million and share repurchases of $34 million
    • Board approved quarterly cash dividend of $0.25 per share, payable on September 4, 2025, to shareholders of record as of August 6, 2025
    • Signed an agreement with Amazon Web Services to migrate and modernize our digital platforms, including the Modern Edge Platform and Unified Data Model, enhancing operational efficiency and data-driven decision-making. The collaboration also boosts Weatherford’s Software Launchpad, offering scalable, cloud-based solutions while ensuring data control and integration flexibility

    *Non-GAAP – refer to the section titled Non-GAAP Financial Measures Defined and GAAP to Non-GAAP Financial Measures Reconciled

    HOUSTON, July 22, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Weatherford International plc (NASDAQ: WFRD) (“Weatherford” or the “Company”) announced today its results for the second quarter of 2025.

    Revenues for the second quarter of 2025 were $1,204 million, an increase of 1% sequentially and a decrease of 14% year-over-year. Operating income in the second quarter of 2025 was $237 million, an increase of 67% sequentially and a decrease of 10% year-over-year. Net income in the second quarter of 2025 was $136 million, with a 11.3% margin, an increase of 79%, or 493 basis points, sequentially, and an increase of 9%, or 240 basis points, year-over-year. Adjusted EBITDA* was $254 million, with a 21.1% margin, flat, or a decrease of 11 basis points, sequentially, and a decrease of 30%, or 488 basis points, year-over-year. Basic income per share in the second quarter of 2025 was $1.87, an increase of 81% sequentially and an increase of 10% year-over-year. Diluted income per share in the second quarter of 2025 was $1.87, an increase of 81% sequentially and an increase of 13% year-over-year.

    Second quarter 2025 cash flows provided by operating activities were $128 million, a decrease of 10% sequentially and a decrease of 15% year-over-year. Adjusted free cash flow* was $79 million, an increase of 20% sequentially and a decrease of 18% year-over-year. Capital expenditures were $54 million in the second quarter of 2025, a decrease of 30% sequentially and a decrease of 13% year-over-year.

    Girish Saligram, President and Chief Executive Officer, commented, “Our core operating markets continued to exhibit activity slowdown during the quarter, driven by geopolitical events, supply-demand imbalance concerns, and trade uncertainties. Despite these structural headwinds, the One Weatherford team delivered second-quarter results in line with expectations, reflecting disciplined execution and operational efficiency in a distinctly softer market. The sequential performance demonstrates strong fundamentals and the resilience of our operating model. Revenues increased and adjusted EBITDA was flat despite the previously announced divestiture of certain businesses in Argentina. Adjusted Free Cash Flow also increased, even as receivables continued to build in Latin America due to lack of payments in Mexico. This performance underscores the strength of the new Weatherford operating paradigm and marks a positive departure from past responses to prior market cycle inflections.

    Looking ahead, activity levels in both North America and international markets continue to show signs of sluggishness, and expectations for a broader sector recovery have shifted further to the right. While we anticipate a relatively flat trajectory on revenues for the immediate future, we remain focused on driving adjusted free cash flow conversion through portfolio optimization, structural cost efficiencies, optimization of working capital, and CAPEX efficiency.”

    *Non-GAAP – refer to the section titled Non-GAAP Financial Measures Defined and GAAP to Non-GAAP Financial Measures Reconciled

    Operational & Commercial Highlights

    • An International Oil Company (IOC) awarded Weatherford a three-year contract to provide Managed Pressure Drilling (MPD) services for a deepwater development project in Mexico.
    • Aramco awarded Weatherford a one-year contract extension to provide MPD services for its onshore and offshore wells.
    • Weatherford, with Superior Energy Services, secured a three-year contract to supply conventional completions (Upper and Lower) equipment to Petrobras for pre-salt and post-salt fields offshore Brazil.
    • Cairn Oil & Gas granted Weatherford a Letter of Award to provide Completions, Liner Hanger, Whipstock systems and services, and MPD services for High Temperature – Ultra High Temperature (HT-UHT) drilling and rigless project in Barmer, India.
    • bp UK awarded Weatherford a one-year contract to provide Cementation Products, Completions, Drilling Services, Intervention Services & Drilling Tools (ISDT), and a one-year contract to provide Liner Hanger systems for the Northern Endurance Partnership CO2 Storage Project in offshore UK.
    • Beach Energy Limited awarded Weatherford contracts to provide Cementation Products, Cement Heads, Liner Hangers, and Tubular Running Services (TRS) for a campaign in offshore Australia.
    • Origin Energy awarded Weatherford a five-year contract to re-supply PCP systems in onshore Australia.
    • OMV awarded Weatherford a three-year contract to supply Completions and Reservoir Monitoring equipment in Tunisia.
    • Shell awarded Weatherford a three-year contract to provide ISDT offshore in the Gulf of America.
    • An IOC awarded Weatherford a three-year contract to provide thru-tubing Well Services in offshore Malaysia.
    • Kuwait Oil Company (KOC) awarded Weatherford a contract for the supply of XpressTM XT Liner Hanger systems for deep drilling operations in Kuwait.
    • A National Oil Company in the Middle East awarded a two-year contract to provide thru-tubing and safety valve systems in the United Arab Emirates.
    • A major operator in Canada awarded Weatherford a two-year contract to provide Artificial Lift services in onshore Canada.
    • Weatherford, in strategic partnership with Constellation, secured a three-year contract to deliver TRS, integrating the automated Vero™ technology into their rig for Petrobras in offshore Brazil.

    Technology Highlights

    • Drilling & Evaluation (“DRE”)
      • In Kuwait, Weatherford successfully deployed combined Magnus™ and Victus™ solutions for a pilot project for KOC. This approach enabled the use of a smaller wellhead, eliminated one casing string, and allowed effective drilling and cementing through stacked reservoirs, potentially unlocking new completion designs and enhancing recovery.
      • In Qatar, Weatherford successfully completed the first Modus™ job using MPD techniques that significantly improved operational efficiency and well safety. The Modus system enabled the operator to reach the targeted total depth while saving substantial rig time and costs compared to conventional methods.
      • In Norway, Weatherford successfully completed three open hole logging jobs for an international operator using coiled tubing for deployment. This approach enabled effective logging in a highly deviated well, overcoming the limitations of conventional wireline conveyance.
    • Well Construction and Completions (“WCC”)
      • In the Gulf of America, Weatherford successfully integrated multiple TRS technologies for bp. This integration enhanced operational speed, cost-effectiveness, and well integrity while improving quality, efficiency, and safety by reducing personnel requirements and eliminating manual intervention.
      • In the United Kingdom, Weatherford successfully implemented StringGuardTM for Shell. The solution is designed to provide protection against potential dropped string events, with the aim of maintaining operational focus and incident free delivery.
    • Production and Intervention (“PRI”)
      • Weatherford’s Rotaflex® Artificial Lift technology has witnessed continued global adoption, with recent installations in France, Australia, and Oman. These projects have addressed a variety of operational challenges, including the replacement of Electric Submersible Pumps and conventional pumping units, enhancement of production efficiency, support for Coal Bed Methane initiatives, and restoration of output in complex wells, underscoring the versatility and effectiveness of the Rotaflex technology.
      • In Norway, Weatherford completed a successful field trial of TITAN RS technology for Equinor, following the acquisition of Ardyne. The trial delivered a full casing cut and recovery solution for the plug and abandonment market, reinforcing Weatherford’s leadership in advanced well abandonment.
      • In Saudi Arabia, Weatherford installed the first Rod Lift system in the Jafurah field. The unit was successfully commissioned, validating Weatherford’s Rod Lift technology as a viable artificial lift solution for this unconventional gas field.

    Shareholder Return

    During the second quarter of 2025, Weatherford paid dividends of $18 million and repurchased shares for approximately $34 million, resulting in a total shareholder return of $52 million. In the first half of the year, Weatherford paid dividends of $36 million and repurchased shares for approximately $87 million, resulting in a total shareholder return of $123 million.

    On July 17, 2025, our Board declared a cash dividend of $0.25 per share of the Company’s ordinary shares, payable on September 4, 2025, to shareholders of record as of August 6, 2025.

    Results by Reportable Segment

    Drilling and Evaluation (“DRE”)
      

        Three Months Ended   Variance
    ($ in Millions)   June 30,
    2025    		   March 31,
    2025    		   June 30,
    2024    		   Seq.   YoY
    Revenue   $          335     $              350     $          427     (4)   %   (22)    %
    Segment Adjusted EBITDA   $            69     $                 74     $          130     (7)   %   (47)    %
    Segment Adj EBITDA Margin     20.6 %     21.1 %     30.4 %            (55) bps         (985) bps

    Second quarter 2025 DRE revenue of $335 million decreased by $15 million, or 4% sequentially, primarily from lower Wireline activity in North America and Latin America partly offset by higher Drilling Services activity in Europe/Sub-Sahara Africa/Russia and Latin America. Year-over-year DRE revenue decreased by $92 million, or 22%, primarily from lower activity across all geographies, especially in Latin America, partly offset by higher Drilling Services activity in Europe/Sub-Sahara Africa/ Russia, North America and Middle East/North Africa/Asia.

    Second quarter 2025 DRE segment adjusted EBITDA of $69 million decreased by $5 million, or 7% sequentially, primarily from lower Wireline activity, partly offset by higher Drilling Services activity. Year-over-year DRE segment adjusted EBITDA decreased by $61 million, or 47%, primarily from lower activity across all geographies, especially in Latin America.

    Well Construction and Completions (“WCC”)  

        Three Months Ended   Variance
    ($ in Millions)   June 30,
    2025    		   March 31,
    2025    		   June 30,
    2024    		   Seq.   YoY
    Revenue   $          456     $              441     $          504     3 %   (10)   %
    Segment Adjusted EBITDA   $          118     $              128     $          145     (8) %   (19)   %
    Segment Adj EBITDA Margin     25.9 %     29.0 %     28.8 %         (315) bps          (289) bps

    Second quarter 2025 WCC revenue of $456 million increased by $15 million, or 3% sequentially, primarily from higher Liner Hangers and Cementation Products activity partly offset by lower Completions activity especially in Latin America.  Year-over-year WCC revenues decreased by $48 million, or 10%, primarily from lower activity in Latin America, Europe/Sub-Sahara Africa/Russia and North America partly offset by higher Liner Hangers activity in Middle East/North Africa/Asia.

    Second quarter 2025 WCC segment adjusted EBITDA of $118 million decreased by $10 million, or 8% sequentially, primarily from lower Completions activity partly offset by higher Liner Hangers activity and Cementation Products activity and fall through. Year-over-year WCC segment adjusted EBITDA decreased by $27 million, or 19%, primarily from lower activity in Latin America, Europe/Sub-Sahara Africa/Russia and North America partly offset by higher Liner Hangers and TRS fall through in Middle East/North Africa/Asia.

    Production and Intervention (“PRI”)  

        Three Months Ended   Variance
    ($ in Millions)   June 30,
    2025    		   March 31,
    2025    		   June 30,
    2024    		   Seq.   YoY
    Revenue   $          327         $              334     $          369     (2)  %   (11)   %
    Segment Adjusted EBITDA   $            63         $                 62     $            85     2 %   (26)   %
    Segment Adj EBITDA Margin     19.3 %     18.6 %     23.0 %             70  bps          (377) bps

    Second quarter 2025 PRI revenue of $327 million  decreased by $7 million, or 2% sequentially, primarily from lower Pressure Pumping activity in Latin America pursuant to the sale of the Argentina Pressure Pumping business partly offset by higher Artificial Lift and Sub-sea Intervention activity. Year-over-year PRI revenue decreased by $42 million, or 11%, as lower activity across all geographies was partly offset by higher Sub-sea intervention activity in Latin America.

    Second quarter 2025 PRI segment adjusted EBITDA of $63 million increased by $1 million, or 2% sequentially, primarily from  higher Sub-sea Intervention activity and fall through partly offset by lower Pressure Pumping activity in Latin America pursuant to the sale of the Argentina Pressure Pumping business. Year-over-year PRI segment adjusted EBITDA decreased by $22 million, or 26%, primarily from lower activity across all geographies, partly offset by higher Sub-sea intervention activity and fall through in Latin America.

    Revenue by Geography 

        Three Months Ended   Variance
    ($ in Millions)   June 30,
    2025    		   March 31,
    2025    		   June 30,
    2024    		   Seq.   YoY
    North America   $             241   $                  250   $             252   (4) %   (4) %
                         
    International   $             963   $                  943   $          1,153   2 %   (16) %
       Latin America                     195                        241                    353   (19) %   (45) %
       Middle East/North Africa/Asia                    524                        503                    542   4 %   (3) %
       Europe/Sub-Sahara Africa/Russia                    244                        199                    258   23 %   (5) %
    Total Revenue   $          1,204   $               1,193   $          1,405   1 %   (14) %


    North America

    Second quarter 2025 North America revenue of $241 million decreased by $9 million, or 4% sequentially, primarily from lower Wireline activity in Canada Land, partly offset by higher Cementation Products and Liner Hangers activity. Year-over-year, North America decreased by $11 million, or 4% , primarily from lower activity across all the segments, partly offset by higher activity in US Offshore.

    International

    Second quarter 2025 international revenue of $963 million increased by $20 million, or 2% sequentially and decreased by $190 million, or 16% year-over-year.

    Second quarter 2025 Latin America revenue of $195 million decreased by $46 million, or 19% sequentially, primarily from lower activity in Argentina pursuant to the sale of the Argentina Pressure Pumping business, partly offset by higher Sub-sea intervention activity. Year-over-year, Latin America revenue decreased by $158 million, or 45%, primarily from lower activity in Mexico and Argentina, partly offset by higher Sub-sea intervention activity.

    Second quarter 2025 Middle East/North Africa/Asia revenue of $524 million increased by $21 million, or 4% sequentially, primarily from higher Liner Hangers and Cementation Products activity partly offset by lower Drilling Services. Year-over-year, the Middle East/North Africa/Asia revenue decreased by $18 million, or 3%, primarily from lower activity in the DRE and PRI segments partly offset by higher Liner Hangers activity.

    Second quarter 2025 Europe/Sub-Sahara Africa/Russia revenue of $244 million increased by $45 million, or 23% sequentially, primarily from higher activity across all the segments. Year-over-year, Europe/Sub-Sahara Africa/Russia revenue decreased by $14 million, or 5%, primarily from lower activity across all the segments especially WCC, partly offset by higher Drilling Services and Pressure Pumping.

    About Weatherford
    Weatherford delivers innovative energy services that integrate proven technologies with advanced digitalization to create sustainable offerings for maximized value and return on investment. Our world-class experts partner with customers to optimize their resources and realize the full potential of their assets. Operators choose us for strategic solutions that add efficiency, flexibility, and responsibility to any energy operation. The Company conducts business in approximately 75 countries and has approximately 17,300 team members representing more than 110 nationalities and 310 operating locations. Visit weatherford.com for more information and connect with us on social media.

    Conference Call Details

    Weatherford will host a conference call on Wednesday, July 23, 2025, to discuss the Company’s results for the second quarter ended June 30, 2025. The conference call will begin at 8:30 a.m. Eastern Time (7:30 a.m. Central Time).

    Listeners are encouraged to download the accompanying presentation slides which will be available in the investor relations section of the Company’s website.

    Listeners can participate in the conference call via a live webcast at https://www.weatherford.com/investor-relations/investor-news-and-events/events/ or by dialing +1 877-328-5344 (within the U.S.) or +1 412-902-6762 (outside of the U.S.) and asking for the Weatherford conference call. Participants should log in or dial in approximately 10 minutes prior to the start of the call.

    A telephonic replay of the conference call will be available until August 6, 2025, at 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time. To access the replay, please dial +1 877-344-7529 (within the U.S.) or +1 412-317-0088 (outside of the U.S.) and reference conference number 1312926. A replay and transcript of the earnings call will also be available in the investor relations section of the Company’s website.

    Contacts
    For Investors:
    Luke Lemoine
    Senior Vice President, Corporate Development & Investor Relations
    +1 713-836-7777
    investor.relations@weatherford.com

    For Media:
    Kelley Hughes
    Senior Director, Communications & Employee Engagement
    media@weatherford.com

    Forward-Looking Statements

    This news release contains projections and forward-looking statements concerning, among other things, the Company’s adjusted EBITDA*, adjusted EBITDA margin*, adjusted free cash flow*, shareholder return program, forecasts or expectations regarding business outlook, prospects for its operations, capital expenditures, expectations regarding future financial results, and are also generally identified by the words “believe,” “project,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “outlook,” “budget,” “intend,” “strategy,” “plan,” “guidance,” “may,” “should,” “could,” “will,” “would,” “will be,” “will continue,” “will likely result,” and similar expressions, although not all forward-looking statements contain these identifying words. Such statements are based upon the current beliefs of Weatherford’s management and are subject to significant risks, assumptions, and uncertainties. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those indicated in our forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned that forward-looking statements are only estimates and may differ materially from actual future events or results, based on factors including but not limited to: global political, economic and market conditions, political disturbances, war or other global conflicts, terrorist attacks, changes in global trade policies, tariffs and sanctions, weak local economic conditions and international currency fluctuations; general global economic repercussions related to U.S. and global inflationary pressures and potential recessionary concerns; various effects from conflicts in the Middle East and the Russia Ukraine conflicts, including, but not limited to, nationalization of assets, extended business interruptions, sanctions, treaties and regulations (including changes in the regulatory environment) imposed by various countries, associated operational and logistical challenges, and impacts to the overall global energy supply; cybersecurity issues; our ability to comply with, and respond to, climate change, environmental, social and governance and other sustainability initiatives and future legislative and regulatory measures both globally and in specific geographic regions; the potential for a resurgence of a pandemic in a given geographic area and related disruptions; the price and price volatility of, and demand for, oil and natural gas; the macroeconomic outlook for the oil and gas industry; our ability to generate cash flow from operations to fund our operations; our ability to effectively and timely adapt our technology portfolio, products and services to remain competitive, and to address and participate in changes to the market demands, including for the transition to alternate sources of energy such as geothermal, carbon capture and responsible abandonment, including our digitalization efforts, increases in the prices and lead times, and the lack of availability of our procured products and services, including due to macroeconomic and geopolitical conditions such as tariffs and changes in trade policies, our ability to timely collect from customers; our ability to effectively execute our capital allocation framework; our ability to return capital to shareholders, including those related to the timing and amounts (including any plans or commitments in respect thereof) of any dividends and share repurchases; and the realization of additional cost savings and operational efficiencies.

    These risks and uncertainties are more fully described in Weatherford’s reports and registration statements filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the risk factors described in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K and Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q. Accordingly, you should not place undue reliance on any of the Company’s forward-looking statements. Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which such statement is made, and the Company undertakes no obligation to correct or update any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by applicable law, and we caution you not to rely on them unduly.

    *Non-GAAP – refer to the section titled Non-GAAP Financial Measures Defined and GAAP to Non-GAAP Financial Measures Reconciled

    Weatherford International plc
    Selected Statements of Operations (Unaudited)
                         
        Three Months Ended   Six Months Ended
    ($ in Millions, Except Per Share Amounts)   June 30,
    2025    		   March 31,
    2025    		   June 30,
    2024    		   June 30,
    2025    		   June 30,
    2024
    Revenues:                    
    DRE Revenues   $              335     $                 350     $              427     $            685     $            849  
    WCC Revenues                    456                          441                      504                     897                    962  
    PRI Revenues                    327                          334                      369                     661                    717  
    All Other                       86                            68                      105                     154                    235  
    Total Revenues                 1,204                      1,193                   1,405                 2,397                 2,763  
                         
    Operating Income:                    
    DRE Segment Adjusted EBITDA[1]   $                69     $                    74     $              130     $            143     $            260  
    WCC Segment Adjusted EBITDA[1]                    118                          128                      145                     246                    265  
    PRI Segment Adjusted EBITDA[1]                       63                            62                        85                     125                    158  
    All Other[2]                       19                              4                        23                       23                       50  
    Corporate[2]                     (15 )                        (15 )                    (18 )                   (30 )                   (32 )
    Depreciation and Amortization                     (64 )                        (62 )                    (86 )                 (126 )                (171 )
    Share-based Compensation                       (9 )                          (7 )                    (12 )                   (16 )                   (25 )
    Gain on Sale of Business                       70                            —                        —                       70                       —  
    Restructuring Charges                     (11 )                        (29 )                       (5 )                   (40 )                     (8 )
    Other (Charges) Credits                       (3 )                        (13 )                        2                     (16 )                     —  
    Operating Income                    237                          142                      264                     379                    497  
                         
    Other Expense:                    
    Interest Expense, Net of Interest Income of $14, $11,
    $17, $25 and $31    		                     (21 )                        (26 )                    (24 )                   (47 )                   (53 )
    Loss on Blue Chip Swap Securities                       (1 )                          —                      (10 )                     (1 )                   (10 )
    Other Expense, Net                     (24 )                        (20 )                    (20 )                   (44 ) —                 (42 )
    Income Before Income Taxes                    191                            96                      210                     287                    392  
    Income Tax Provision                     (46 )                        (10 )                    (73 )                   (56 )                (132 )
    Net Income                    145                            86                      137                     231                    260  
    Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests                         9                            10                        12                       19                       23  
    Net Income Attributable to Weatherford   $              136     $                    76     $              125     $            212     $            237  
                         
    Basic Income Per Share   $             1.87     $                1.04     $             1.71     $           2.91     $           3.25  
    Basic Weighted Average Shares Outstanding                   72.2                         73.1                     73.2                    72.7                   73.1  
                         
    Diluted Income Per Share   $             1.87     $                1.03     $             1.66     $           2.90     $           3.16  
    Diluted Weighted Average Shares Outstanding                   72.4                         73.4                     75.3       72.9       75.0  
    [1] Segment adjusted EBITDA is our primary measure of segment profitability under U.S. GAAP ASC 280 “Segment Reporting” and represents segment earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization, share-based compensation, restructuring charges and other adjustments. Research and development expenses are included in segment adjusted EBITDA.
    [2] All Other includes results from non-core business activities (including integrated services and projects), and Corporate includes overhead support and centrally managed or shared facilities costs. All Other and Corporate do not individually meet the criteria for segment reporting.
    Weatherford International plc
    Selected Balance Sheet Data (Unaudited)
           
    ($ in Millions) June 30, 2025   December 31, 2024
    Assets:      
    Cash and Cash Equivalents $                              943   $                                 916
    Restricted Cash                                     60                                         59
    Accounts Receivable, Net                               1,177                                    1,261
    Inventories, Net                                  881                                       880
    Property, Plant and Equipment, Net                               1,136                                    1,061
    Intangibles, Net                                  305                                       325
           
    Liabilities:      
    Accounts Payable                                  685                                       792
    Accrued Salaries and Benefits                                  252                                       302
    Current Portion of Long-term Debt                                     26                                         17
    Long-term Debt                               1,565                                    1,617
           
    Shareholders’ Equity:      
    Total Shareholders’ Equity                               1,519                                    1,283
    Weatherford International plc
    Selected Cash Flows Information (Unaudited)
                         
        Three Months Ended   Six Months Ended
    ($ in Millions)   June 30,
    2025    		   March 31,
    2025    		   June 30,
    2024    		   June 30,
    2025    		   June 30,
    2024
    Cash Flows From Operating Activities:                    
    Net Income   $             145     $                    86     $             137     $             231     $             260  
    Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income to Net Cash
    Provided By Operating Activities:    		                    
    Depreciation and Amortization                      64                             62                        86                      126                      171  
    Foreign Exchange Losses                      17                             13                          8                        30                        23  
    Loss on Blue Chip Swap Securities                        1                             —                        10                          1                        10  
    Gain on Disposition of Assets                      (3 )                           (1 )                    (25 )                      (4 )                    (32 )
    Gain on Sale of Business                    (70 )                           —                        —                      (70 )                      —   
    Deferred Income Tax Provision (Benefit)                      (5 )                             7                        13                          2                        27  
    Share-Based Compensation                        9                               7                        12                        16                        25  
    Changes in Accounts Receivable, Inventory, Accounts
    Payable and Accrued Salaries and Benefits    		                    (22 )                         (17 )                    (22 )                    (39 )                  (174 )
    Other Changes, Net                      (8 )                         (15 )                    (69 )                    (23 )                    (29 )
    Net Cash Provided By Operating Activities                    128                          142                      150                      270                      281  
                         
    Cash Flows From Investing Activities:                    
    Capital Expenditures for Property, Plant and Equipment                    (54 )                         (77 )                    (62 )                  (131 )                  (121 )
    Proceeds from Disposition of Assets                        5                               1                          8                          6                        18  
    Proceeds from Sale of Businesses                      97                             —                        —                        97                        —   
    Purchases of Blue Chip Swap Securities                    (83 )                           —                      (50 )                    (83 )                    (50 )
    Proceeds from Sales of Blue Chip Swap Securities                      82                             —                        40                        82                        40  
    Business Acquisitions, Net of Cash Acquired                      —                             —                        —                        —                       (36 )
    Proceeds from Sale of Investments                      —                             —                        —                        —                         41  
    Other Investing Activities                      (4 )                           (3 )                        3                        (7 )                      (7 )
    Net Cash Provided by (Used In) Investing Activities                      43                           (79 )                    (61 )                    (36 )                  (115 )
                         
    Cash Flows From Financing Activities:                    
    Repayments of Long-term Debt                    (34 )                         (39 )                    (87 )                    (73 )                  (259 )
       Distributions to Noncontrolling Interests                      (8 )                           —                        (9 )                      (8 )                      (9 )
    Tax Remittance on Equity Awards                      —                           (20 )                      (1 )                    (20 )                      (9 )
    Share Repurchases                    (34 )                         (53 )                      —                      (87 )                      —   
    Dividends Paid                    (18 )                         (18 )                      —                      (36 )                      —   
    Other Financing Activities                      (3 )                           (3 )                      (5 )                      (6 )                    (12 )
    Net Cash Used In Financing Activities   $              (97 )   $                (133 )   $           (102 )   $           (230 )   $           (289 )
    Weatherford International plc
    Non-GAAP Financial Measures Defined (Unaudited)

    We report our financial results in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). However, Weatherford’s management believes that certain non-GAAP financial measures (as defined under the SEC’s Regulation G and Item 10(e) of Regulation S-K) may provide users of this financial information additional meaningful comparisons between current results and results of prior periods and comparisons with peer companies. The non-GAAP amounts shown in the following tables should not be considered as substitutes for results reported in accordance with GAAP but should be viewed in addition to the Company’s reported results prepared in accordance with GAAP.

    Adjusted EBITDA* – Adjusted EBITDA* is a non-GAAP measure and represents consolidated income before interest expense, net, income taxes, depreciation and amortization expense, and excludes, among other items, restructuring charges, share-based compensation expense, as well as other charges and credits. Management believes adjusted EBITDA* is useful to assess and understand normalized operating performance and trends. Adjusted EBITDA* should be considered in addition to, but not as a substitute for consolidated net income and should be viewed in addition to the Company’s reported results prepared in accordance with GAAP.

    Adjusted EBITDA margin* – Adjusted EBITDA margin* is a non-GAAP measure which is calculated by dividing consolidated adjusted EBITDA* by consolidated revenues. Management believes adjusted EBITDA margin* is useful to assess and understand normalized operating performance and trends. Adjusted EBITDA margin* should be considered in addition to, but not as a substitute for consolidated net income margin and should be viewed in addition to the Company’s reported results prepared in accordance with GAAP.

    Adjusted Free Cash Flow* – Adjusted Free Cash Flow* is a non-GAAP measure and represents cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities, less capital expenditures plus proceeds from the disposition of assets. Management believes adjusted free cash flow* is useful to understand our performance at generating cash and demonstrates our discipline around the use of cash. Adjusted free cash flow* should be considered in addition to, but not as a substitute for cash flows provided by operating activities and should be viewed in addition to the Company’s reported results prepared in accordance with GAAP.

    Net Debt* – Net Debt* is a non-GAAP measure that is calculated taking short and long-term debt less cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash. Management believes the net debt* is useful to assess the level of debt in excess of cash and cash and equivalents as we monitor our ability to repay and service our debt. Net debt* should be considered in addition to, but not as a substitute for overall debt and total cash and should be viewed in addition to the Company’s results prepared in accordance with GAAP.​

    Net Leverage* – Net Leverage* is a non-GAAP measure which is calculated by dividing by taking net debt* divided by adjusted EBITDA* for the trailing 12 months. Management believes the net leverage* is useful to understand our ability to repay and service our debt. Net leverage* should be considered in addition to, but not as a substitute for the individual components of above defined net debt* divided by consolidated net income attributable to Weatherford and should be viewed in addition to the Company’s reported results prepared in accordance with GAAP.

    *Non-GAAP – as defined above and reconciled to the GAAP measures in the section titled GAAP to Non-GAAP Financial Measures Reconciled

    Weatherford International plc
    GAAP to Non-GAAP Financial Measures Reconciled (Unaudited)
     
                         
        Three Months Ended   Six Months Ended
    ($ in Millions, Except Margin in Percentages)   June 30,
    2025    		   March 31,
    2025    		   June 30,
    2024    		   June 30,
    2025    		   June 30,
    2024
    Revenues   $         1,204     $          1,193     $         1,405     $      2,397     $      2,763  
    Net Income Attributable to Weatherford   $            136     $                76     $            125     $         212     $         237  
    Net Income Margin     11.3 %     6.4 %     8.9 %     8.8 %     8.6 %
    Adjusted EBITDA*   $            254     $              253     $            365     $         507     $         701  
    Adjusted EBITDA Margin*     21.1 %     21.2 %     26.0 %     21.2 %     25.4 %
                         
    Net Income Attributable to Weatherford   $            136     $                76     $            125     $         212     $         237  
    Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests                       9                        10                       12                    19                    23  
    Income Tax Provision                     46                        10                       73                    56                 132  
    Interest Expense, Net of Interest Income of $14, $11,
    $17, $25 and $31    		                     21                        26                       24                    47                    53  
    Loss on Blue Chip Swap Securities                       1                        —                       10                      1                    10  
    Other Expense, Net                     24                        20                       20                    44                    42  
    Operating Income                  237                      142                    264                 379                 497  
    Depreciation and Amortization                     64                        62                       86                 126                 171  
    Other Charges (Credits)[1]                       3                        13                       (2 )                  16                    —  
    Gain on Sale of Business                   (70 )                      —                       —                  (70 )                  —  
    Restructuring Charges                     11                        29                         5                    40                      8  
    Share-Based Compensation                       9                          7                       12                    16                    25  
    Adjusted EBITDA*   $            254     $              253     $            365     $         507     $         701  
                         
    Net Cash Provided By Operating Activities   $            128     $              142     $            150     $         270     $         281  
    Capital Expenditures for Property, Plant and
    Equipment    		                   (54 )                    (77 )                   (62 )             (131 )             (121 )
    Proceeds from Disposition of Assets                       5                          1                         8                      6                    18  
    Adjusted Free Cash Flow*   $              79     $                66     $              96     $         145     $         178  
    [1] Other Charges (Credits) in the three and six months ended June 30, 2025 primarily includes fees to third-party financial institutions related to collections of certain receivables from our largest customer in Mexico and other miscellaneous charges and credits.

    *Non-GAAP – as reconciled to the GAAP measures above and defined in the section titled Non-GAAP Financial Measures Defined

    Weatherford International plc
    GAAP to Non-GAAP Financial Measures Reconciled Continued (Unaudited)
     
                   
         
    ($ in Millions)   June 30,
    2025    		   March 31,
    2025    		   June 30,
    2024    		  
    Current Portion of Long-term Debt   $                   26   $                    22   $                   20  
    Long-term Debt                    1,565                    1,583                    1,628  
    Total Debt   $              1,591   $              1,605   $              1,648  
                   
    Cash and Cash Equivalents   $                 943   $                 873   $                 862  
    Restricted Cash                          60                          57                          58  
    Total Cash   $              1,003   $                 930   $                 920  
                   
    Components of Net Debt              
    Current Portion of Long-term Debt   $                   26   $                    22   $                   20  
    Long-term Debt                    1,565                    1,583                    1,628  
    Less: Cash and Cash Equivalents                       943                        873                       862  
    Less: Restricted Cash                          60                          57                          58  
    Net Debt*   $                 588   $                 675   $                 728  
                   
    Net Income for trailing 12 months   $                 481   $                 470   $                 500  
    Adjusted EBITDA* for trailing 12 months   $              1,188   $              1,299   $              1,327  
                   
    Net Leverage* (Net Debt*/Adjusted EBITDA*)                      0.49 x                     0.52 x                    0.55 x


    *Non-GAAP – as reconciled to the GAAP measures above and defined in the section titled Non-GAAP Financial Measures Defined

    The MIL Network –

  • MIL-OSI: Ellomay Capital Announces the Acquisition of 15% of Dorad Energy’s Shares by Ellomay Luzon Energy, Increasing Ellomay Luzon Energy’s Holdings in Dorad to 33.75%

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Tel-Aviv, Israel, July 22, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Ellomay Capital Ltd. (NYSE American; TASE: ELLO) (“Ellomay” or the “Company”), a renewable energy and power generator and developer of renewable energy and power projects in Europe, the USA and Israel, announced that on July 22, 2025, Ellomay Luzon Energy Infrastructures Ltd. (“Ellomay Luzon Energy”), an Israeli private company 50% held indirectly by the Company, completed the acquisition of 15% of the outstanding shares of Dorad Energy Ltd. (“Dorad”). As a result of the acquisition, Ellomay Luzon Energy holds 33.75% of Dorad’s outstanding shares.  

    Ellomay Luzon Energy acquired 15% of Dorad’s outstanding shares by exercising the right of first refusal granted to Ellomay Luzon Energy and other Dorad shareholders in connection with a sale of the shares by Zorlu Enerji Elektrik Üretim A.S (“Zorlu”), a former Dorad shareholder. In connection with the right of first refusal process, Ellomay Luzon Energy and Edelcom Ltd. (“Edelcom”), each executed an agreement to purchase 7.5% of Dorad’s shares. As not all the conditions to closing of the sale of 7.5% of Dorad’s shares to Edelcom were fulfilled, Edelcom’s agreement was terminated and Ellomay Luzon Energy, who did succeed in fulfilling all of the conditions to closing, acquired 15% of Dorad’s shares.

    The consideration for the shares was approximately NIS 424 million (approximately €108 million), and was funded by bank financing (the “Loan Agreement”) provided to Ellomay Luzon Energy consisting of three tranches as follows: (i) a loan in the amount of NIS 175 million (approximately €45 million), bearing annual interest in the range of +0.5% to -0.5% of the Israeli Prime Rate (the “First Loan”), (ii) a loan in the amount of NIS 175 million (approximately €45 million), bearing fixed annual interest rate between 5% and 6% (the “Second Loan”), and (iii) a loan in the amount of NIS 70 million (approximately €18 million), bearing annual interest rate in the range of +0.5% to -0.5% of the Israeli Prime Rate (the “Third Loan”).

    The First Loan is repayable in four semi-annual payments commencing December 31, 2031 and ending on June 30, 2033, and the interest on the First Loan is payable in semi-annual payments commencing December 31, 2025 and ending on the final repayment of the First Loan. The Second Loan is repayable in sixteen semi-annual payments commencing December 31, 2025 and ending on June 30, 2033, and the interest on the Second Loan is payable in semi-annual payment commencing December 31, 2025 and ending on the final repayment of the Second Loan. The Third Loan is repayable in one payment on December 31, 2025, unless the conditions set forth in the Loan Agreement will not be met, which will enable Ellomay Luzon Energy to ask for an extension until December 31, 2026. The interest on the Third Loan is payable on December 31, 2025 and, to the extent an extension is requested, in semi-annual payments thereafter until the final repayment of the Third Loan.

    In connection with the Loan Agreement, Ellomay Luzon Energy granted the lender a first ranking fixed pledge on its rights in connection with an account with the lender (the “Pledged Account”), in which all amounts due to Ellomay Luzon Energy from Dorad will be deposited. The Loan Agreement provides that when any dividend is received from Dorad: (i) Ellomay Luzon Energy will leave in the Pledged Account the amount required for the next payment to the lender, (ii) to the extent the amount received during a calendar year exceeds NIS 65 million, then Ellomay Luzon Energy will make an early repayment of the First Loan and thereafter the Third Loan in the amount of 50% of the difference between the amount of receipts in the calendar year and NIS 65 million by no later than June 30 of the following year (pro rata over all future payments), and (iii) with respect to any amount in excess of the amounts required as stated in paragraphs (i) and (ii) – Ellomay Luzon Energy is entitled to use the funds deposited in the Pledged Account for any need, subject to the provisions of the law and the agreements with the lender. The Loan Agreement provides that the First and Third Loans may be prepaid without an early repayment fee and the Second Loan may be prepaid subject to payment of fees as generally acceptable in the lender.

    The Loan Agreement includes customary immediate repayment provisions, including in the event of a breach of an undertaking by Ellomay Luzon Energy, a deterioration in Ellomay Luzon Energy’s financial situation and the initiation of legal proceedings in connection with the Dorad shares held by Ellomay Luzon Energy. The Loan Agreement includes additional undertakings by Ellomay Luzon Energy, including not to amend the Ellomay Luzon Energy shareholders’ agreement without the lender’s prior written consent and the execution of an undertaking not to operate outside its current field of operations; not to assume financial obligations and not to provide financing to a third party; not to sell and/or transfer and/or deliver and/or lease and/or rent any Asset and/or any right of its rights, as well as a negative pledge on any Asset (as this term is defined below) and/or part of the its Assets, without the lender’s prior written consent, other than a pledge on its shares of Dorad in favor of the lenders of Dorad. The undertaking defines an “Asset” as any asset and right of Ellomay Luzon Energy, including the shares of Dorad held by it and other rights of any kind, including its unissued share capital and goodwill.

    On July 20, 2025, Edelcom filed a request with the Tel Aviv-Jaffa District Court (the “Court”) for injunctions and temporary injunctions, ex parte, aimed at preventing the receipt of approval from the Dorad board of directors and Dorad’s shareholders for the sale of 7.5% of Dorad’s shares to any third party other than Edelcom and preventing such a sale. The Court, in its decision date July 20, 2025, rejected the request for ex parte relief and directed Edelcom to update the Court on the decisions of Dorad’s board of directors and shareholders by July 22, 2025, and, to the extent that the request for interim relief is still relevant, to file a main proceeding by July 27, 2025, further noting that the respondents (among them, inter alia: Dorad, Ellomay Luzon Energy and Zorlu), will prepare to respond to the request for interim relief by July 30, 2025. The Court’s decision further noted that if future actions will be approved by Dorad based on a transfer of shares if it occurs (and this, as stated, without the Court preventing it), whereby the increased power of the respondents as shareholders is used for the purpose of changes in Dorad’s board of directors, or the transfer of the shares to third parties, as Edelcom noted that it fears, and to the extent that the respondents will try to take such actions or other irrevocable action, Edelcom will be notified seven days in advance, in a manner that will allow it time to act and the Court to give appropriate instructions. A hearing is scheduled for August 6, 2025.

    About Ellomay Capital Ltd.

    Ellomay is an Israeli based company whose shares are registered with the NYSE American and with the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange under the trading symbol “ELLO”. Since 2009, Ellomay focuses its business in the renewable energy and power sectors in Europe, the USA and Israel.

    To date, Ellomay has evaluated numerous opportunities and invested significant funds in the renewable, clean energy and natural resources industries in Israel, Italy, Spain, the Netherlands and Texas, USA, including:

    • Approximately 335.9 MW of operating solar power plants in Spain (including a 300 MW solar plant in owned by Talasol, which is 51% owned by the Company) and 51% of approximately 38 MW of operating solar power plants in Italy;
    • 9.375% indirect interest in Dorad Energy Ltd., which owns and operates one of Israel’s largest private power plants with production capacity of approximately 850MW, representing about 6%-8% of Israel’s total current electricity consumption;
    • Groen Gas Goor B.V., Groen Gas Oude-Tonge B.V. and Groen Gas Gelderland B.V., project companies operating anaerobic digestion plants in the Netherlands, with a green gas production capacity of approximately 3 million, 3.8 million and 9.5 million Nm3 per year, respectively;
    • 83.333% of Ellomay Pumped Storage (2014) Ltd., which is involved in a project to construct a 156 MW pumped storage hydro power plant in the Manara Cliff, Israel;
    • 51% of solar projects in Italy with an aggregate capacity of 160 MW that commenced construction processes;
    • Solar projects in Italy with an aggregate capacity of 134 MW that have reached “ready to build” status; and
    • Solar projects in the Dallas Metropolitan area, Texas, USA with an aggregate capacity of approximately 27 MW that are connected to the grid and additional 22 MW that are awaiting connection to the grid.

    For more information about Ellomay, visit http://www.ellomay.com.

    Information Relating to Forward-Looking Statements

    This press release contains forward-looking statements that involve substantial risks and uncertainties, including statements that are based on the current expectations and assumptions of the Company’s management. All statements, other than statements of historical facts, included in this press release regarding the Company’s plans and objectives, expectations and assumptions of management are forward-looking statements. The use of certain words, including the words “estimate,” “project,” “intend,” “expect,” “believe” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The Company may not actually achieve the plans, intentions or expectations disclosed in the forward-looking statements and you should not place undue reliance on the Company’s forward-looking statements. Various important factors could cause actual results or events to differ materially from those that may be expressed or implied by the Company’s forward-looking statements, including potential outcome of current and future litigation in connection with Dorad’s shares held by Ellomay Luzon Energy, changes in electricity prices and demand, regulatory changes increases in interest rates and inflation, changes in the supply and prices of resources required for the operation of the Company’s facilities (such as waste and natural gas) and in the price of oil, the impact of the war and hostilities in Israel and Gaza and between Israel and Iran, the impact of the continued military conflict between Russia and Ukraine, technical and other disruptions in the operations or construction of the power plants owned by the Company, inability to obtain the financing required for the development and construction of projects, inability to advance the expansion of Dorad, increases in interest rates and inflation, changes in exchange rates, delays in development, construction, or commencement of operation of the projects under development, failure to obtain permits – whether within the set time frame or at all, climate change, and general market, political and economic conditions in the countries in which the Company operates, including Israel, Spain, Italy and the United States. and general market, political and economic conditions in the countries in which the Company operates, including Israel, Spain, Italy and the United States. These and other risks and uncertainties associated with the Company’s business are described in greater detail in the filings the Company makes from time to time with Securities and Exchange Commission, including its Annual Report on Form 20-F. The forward-looking statements are made as of this date and the Company does not undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

    Contact:
    Kalia Rubenbach (Weintraub)
    CFO
    Tel: +972 (3) 797-1111
    Email: hilai@ellomay.com

    The MIL Network –

  • MIL-OSI Russia: US withdrawal from UNESCO contradicts fundamental principles of multilateralism – head of organization

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: People’s Republic of China in Russian – People’s Republic of China in Russian –

    An important disclaimer is at the bottom of this article.

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    PARIS, July 22 (Xinhua) — The US withdrawal from the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) runs counter to the fundamental principles of multilateralism, UNESCO Director-General Audrey Azoulay said on Tuesday.

    Expressing deep regret over the decision taken by US President Donald Trump, O. Azoulay warned that the country’s withdrawal from the organization would primarily affect UNESCO’s American partners, in particular communities applying for inclusion of sites on the World Heritage List, obtaining the status of “UNESCO Creative City” and the creation of UNESCO Chairs.

    The United States announced on Tuesday that it would withdraw from UNESCO by the end of December 2026, just two years after rejoining, marking the country’s third exit from the organization.

    According to a statement from the US State Department, the decision was made in connection with UNESCO’s policy, which Washington believes “promotes divisive social and cultural initiatives” against the backdrop of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

    Commenting on the statement, the UNESCO Director-General expressed regret over the US decision, rejecting the arguments made. She stressed that the organization remains “a rare forum for consensus building through concrete, action-oriented multilateralism.”

    O. Azoulay assured that the US withdrawal from UNESCO in 2026 and the loss of American funding will not affect the normal activities of the organization, since its financial position has been significantly strengthened.

    “We have undertaken major structural reforms and diversified our funding sources. Thanks to the efforts made by the organization since 2018, the decline in US financial contributions has been effectively offset,” the CEO said. –0–

    Please note: This information is raw content obtained directly from the source of the information. It is an accurate report of what the source claims and does not necessarily reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    .

    MIL OSI Russia News –

  • MIL-OSI Russia: Chairmen of NPC Standing Committee, CPPCC National Committee Meet with Madagascar Senate President

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: People’s Republic of China in Russian – People’s Republic of China in Russian –

    An important disclaimer is at the bottom of this article.

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    BEIJING, July 22 (Xinhua) — Zhao Leji, chairman of the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress (NPC), and Wang Huning, chairman of the National Committee of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference (CPPCC), held separate meetings with Richard Ravalomanana, president of the Senate (upper house) of Madagascar, in Beijing on Tuesday.

    As Zhao Leji pointed out, China hopes to work with Madagascar to implement the important consensus reached by the heads of state of the two countries and the results of the Beijing Summit of the Forum on China-Africa Cooperation, strive for new achievements in friendly cooperation between the two countries, and contribute to building an all-weather China-Africa community with a shared future in the new era.

    The NPC Standing Committee chairman called on the legislative bodies of the two countries to strengthen exchanges and cooperation and promote the continuous development of the China-Madagascar comprehensive strategic cooperative partnership.

    R. Ravalomanana, for his part, noted that relations between the two countries are based on mutual benefit and common gain, the heads of the two states maintain close exchanges, setting the vector for the development of Madagascar-Chinese relations.

    The Senate of Madagascar, he said, is willing to work with the Chinese side to strengthen exchanges between legislative bodies and play an active role in promoting cooperation in areas such as economics, trade, investment and interregional relations.

    Wang Huning stated that China and Madagascar are companions and true friends on the path of modernization. According to him, China hopes to work with Madagascar to implement the important consensus reached by the heads of state of the two countries, achieving new results of practical cooperation for the benefit of the peoples of the two countries.

    Wang Huning assured that the CPPCC National Committee is willing to strengthen friendly exchanges with the Senate of Madagascar and promote the development of China-Madagascar comprehensive strategic cooperative partnership.

    R. Ravalomanana, in turn, stated that Madagascar pays special attention to the development of relations with China, admires China’s achievements in the field of development, intends to learn from China’s experience and promote bilateral cooperation in various fields for the benefit of the peoples of both countries.

    The Senate of Madagascar is ready to intensify the exchange of experience in public administration with the CPPCC National Committee to promote the in-depth development of interstate relations, R. Ravalomanana added. –0–

    Please note: This information is raw content obtained directly from the source of the information. It is an accurate report of what the source claims and does not necessarily reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    .

    MIL OSI Russia News –

  • MIL-OSI Russia: Vice Premier of China’s State Council calls for proper work on agricultural production, consolidation of poverty alleviation gains

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: People’s Republic of China in Russian – People’s Republic of China in Russian –

    An important disclaimer is at the bottom of this article.

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    NANNING, July 22 (Xinhua) — Chinese Vice Premier Liu Guozhong on Tuesday called for properly implementing the production of grain and other major agricultural products in China and continuously consolidating and expanding the achievements of the nationwide poverty alleviation campaign.

    Liu Guozhong, also a member of the Political Bureau of the CPC Central Committee, made the remarks during an inspection tour of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region (south China) from July 20 to 22.

    During the trip, Liu Guozhong studied the situation of rice production, sugar crop cultivation and the development of high-standard farmland on the spot.

    Touching upon the pressing issue of typhoons, floods and other natural disasters, the Vice Premier called for measures such as emergency floodwater drainage, replanting and reseeding crops on damaged lands, making efforts to reduce losses in the agricultural sector.

    Liu Guozhong stressed the need for targeted implementation of measures to support the poor, paying special attention to stabilizing the employment of rural migrant workers and people who have escaped poverty, as well as developing rural industries with local specific advantages that improve the well-being of farmers. –0–

    Please note: This information is raw content obtained directly from the source of the information. It is an accurate report of what the source claims and does not necessarily reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    .

    MIL OSI Russia News –

  • MIL-OSI Russia: US deploys nuclear weapons in UK for first time since 2008 – media

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: People’s Republic of China in Russian – People’s Republic of China in Russian –

    An important disclaimer is at the bottom of this article.

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    LONDON, July 22 (Xinhua) — Several U.S. nuclear bombs have been delivered to a British air base, marking the first deployment of U.S. nuclear weapons on British soil since 2008, local media reported Tuesday.

    As reported by the UK Defence Journal on July 20, the US-run Royal Air Force Lakenheath air base in Suffolk, East Anglia, received B61-12 thermonuclear bombs. These are free-fall nuclear bombs weighing about 320 kg, designed to be dropped from aircraft.

    The bombs were allegedly delivered from the Air Force Nuclear Weapons Center in New Mexico using a C-17 military transport aircraft. The aircraft was flying with its transponders on, making it easy for foreign governments and air traffic monitors to track its movements.

    As the Times newspaper clarified, citing military experts, the nature of the American transport plane’s flight indicated a “one-way delivery,” which indicates a permanent placement of weapons, rather than a routine movement.

    Neither the US Department of Defense nor the UK Defense Ministry commented on the incident.

    Ahead of the NATO summit in The Hague in June, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced the purchase of at least 12 new F-35A fighter jets from the US for a total of almost £1 billion (about $1.35 billion). –0–

    Please note: This information is raw content obtained directly from the source of the information. It is an accurate report of what the source claims and does not necessarily reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    .

    MIL OSI Russia News –

  • MIL-OSI Russia: World Fencing Championships Start in Tbilisi

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: People’s Republic of China in Russian – People’s Republic of China in Russian –

    An important disclaimer is at the bottom of this article.

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    TBILISI, July 22 (Xinhua) — The World Fencing Championships kicked off in Georgia’s capital Tbilisi on Tuesday. The country is hosting a competition of this scale for the first time and has fielded a team of 25 strongest athletes, the Georgian Fencing Federation said.

    The competition will last until July 30. According to the organizers, about 1,200 athletes from 135 countries and regions of the world are taking part in the tournament. 12 sets of awards will be contested in fencing with epees, foils and sabres in individual and team disciplines among men and women.

    President of the Georgian Fencing Federation Merab Bazadze expressed confidence that holding the championship will be an important step in the development of fencing in the country. “A lot of people will come, and I am glad that this elite sport will become a priority in Georgia,” he told reporters.

    At the previous World Championship, held in 2023 in Milan /Italy/, the Georgian team won one award – a silver medal, which was won by sabre fencer Sandro Bazadze. –0–

    Please note: This information is raw content obtained directly from the source of the information. It is an accurate report of what the source claims and does not necessarily reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    .

    MIL OSI Russia News –

  • MIL-OSI Russia: Air India plane’s auxiliary power unit catches fire after landing

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: People’s Republic of China in Russian – People’s Republic of China in Russian –

    An important disclaimer is at the bottom of this article.

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    NEW DELHI, July 22 (Xinhua) — An Air India passenger plane, flight AI-315, operating from Hong Kong to Delhi, caught fire in its auxiliary power unit shortly after landing at Indira Gandhi International Airport in New Delhi, the Indian capital, on Tuesday, officials said.

    The fire was discovered as passengers were preparing to exit the plane.

    Air India said no passengers or crew were injured, but the fire caused some damage to the aircraft itself.

    Another Air India flight from Cochin to Mumbai skidded off the runway while landing on Monday, causing damage to both the plane and the road surface, according to media reports. Last month, an Air India flight to London crashed shortly after takeoff in the city of Ahmedabad, killing all 241 people on board. –0–

    Please note: This information is raw content obtained directly from the source of the information. It is an accurate report of what the source claims and does not necessarily reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    .

    MIL OSI Russia News –

  • MIL-OSI United Nations: Amid ‘Horror Show in Gaza’, Humanitarian System Denied Space to Deliver, Multilateral Problem-Solving Needed More than Ever, Secretary-General Tells Security Council

    Source: United Nations General Assembly and Security Council

    Following are UN Secretary-General António Guterres’ remarks to the Security Council on multilateralism and peaceful settlement of disputes, in New York today:

    I want to thank Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar and Pakistan for convening today’s open debate.  The topic of today’s debate shines a light on the clear connection between international peace and multilateralism.

    Eighty years ago, the United Nations was founded with a primary purpose — to safeguard humanity from the scourge of war.  The architects of the United Nations Charter recognized that the peaceful resolution of disputes is the lifeline when geopolitical tensions escalate, when unresolved disputes fuel the flames of conflict and when States lose trust in each other.

    The Charter lays out a number of important tools to forge peace.  Article 2.3 of the UN Charter is clear:  “All Members shall settle their international disputes by peaceful means in such a manner that international peace and security, and justice, are not endangered.”

    Chapter VI of the Charter is equally clear on the specific responsibilities of this Council to help ensure the pacific settlement of disputes “by negotiation, enquiry, mediation, conciliation, arbitration, judicial settlement, resort to regional agencies or arrangements, or other peaceful means of their own choice”.  Action 16 of the Pact of the Future calls on Member States to recommit to all the mechanisms of preventive diplomacy and the peaceful settlement of disputes.

    I commend Pakistan for utilizing its presidency to put forward a resolution urging all Member States to make full use of these tools in our collective pursuit of global peace.  This is needed now more than ever.

    Around the world, we see an utter disregard for — if not outright violations of — international law — including international human rights law, international refugee law, international humanitarian law and the UN Charter itself, without any accountability.

    These failures to uphold international obligations are coming at a time of widening geopolitical divides and conflicts.  And the cost is staggering — measured in human lives, shattered communities, and lost futures.

    We need look no further than the horror show in Gaza — with a level of death and destruction without parallel in recent times.  Malnourishment is soaring.  Starvation is knocking on every door.

    And now we are seeing the last gasp of a humanitarian system built on humanitarian principles.  That system is being denied the conditions to function.  Denied the space to deliver.  Denied the safety to save lives.  With Israeli military operations intensifying and new displacement orders issued in Deir al-Balah, devastation is being layered upon devastation.

    I am appalled that UN premises have been struck — among them facilities of the UN Office for Project Services and the World Health Organization (WHO), including WHO’s main warehouse.  This is despite all parties having been informed of the locations of these UN facilities.  These premises are inviolable and must be protected under international humanitarian law — without exception.

    From Gaza to Ukraine, from the Sahel to Sudan, Haiti and Myanmar, and many other parts of the world, conflict is raging, international law is being trampled, and hunger and displacement are at record levels.  And terrorism, violent extremism and transnational crime remain persistent scourges pushing security further out of reach.

    Diplomacy may not have always succeeded in preventing conflicts, violence and instability.  But it still holds the power to stop them.  Peace is a choice.  And the world expects the UN Security Council to help countries make this choice.  This Council is at the centre of the global architecture for peace and security.  Its creation reflected a central truth.

    Competition between States is a geopolitical reality.  But cooperation — anchored in shared interests and the greater good — is the sustainable pathway to peace.  Too often, we see divisions, entrenched positions and escalatory discourse blocking solutions and the effectiveness of the Council.

    But we have also seen some inspiring examples of finding common ground and forging solutions to global problems.

    For example, today marks three years since the signing of the Black Sea Initiative and the Memorandum of Understanding with the Russian Federation — efforts that show what we can achieve through mediation and the good offices of the United Nations, even during the most challenging moments.

    And we’ve seen many other recent examples.

    From the Sevilla Conference on Financing for Development, to the Oceans Conference in Nice, to the Agreement on Marine Biological Diversity of Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction and the Cybercrime Treaty, to the Pact for the Future adopted last year.

    The Pact, in particular, demonstrates a clear re-commitment by the world to strengthen the United Nations collective security system.  Drawing from the New Agenda for Peace, it prioritizes preventive diplomacy and mediation — all areas where this Council can play a vital role.

    As we look to the theme of today’s debate, I see three areas where we can live up to the Pact’s call to renew our commitment to — and the world’s faith in — the multilateral problem-solving architecture.

    First — this Council’s members, in particular its permanent members, must continue working to overcome divisions.  The majority of situations on the Security Council’s agenda are complex and resist quick fixes.

    But even in the darkest days of the cold war, the collective dialogue and decision-making in this Council underpinned a common and effective system of global security.  One that successfully deployed a range of peacekeeping missions.  One that opened the door for vital humanitarian aid to flow to people in need.  And one that helped prevent a third World War.

    I urge you to summon this same spirit by keeping channels open, continuing to listen in good faith, and working to overcome differences and building consensus.

    We must also work to ensure that this Council reflects the world of today, not the world of 80 years ago.  This Council should be made more representative of today’s geopolitical realities.  And we must continue improving the working methods of this Council to make it more inclusive, transparent, efficient and accountable.  I urge you to continue building consensus to move the intergovernmental negotiations forward.

    Second — this Council must continue strengthening cooperation with regional and subregional partners.  The landmark adoption of Security Council resolution 2719 supporting African Union-led peace support operations through assessed contributions is a good example of how we can join efforts with regional organizations to support more effective responses.

    I also commend this Council’s steps to strengthen and rebuild regional security frameworks to encourage dialogue and advance the peaceful settlement of disputes.

    And third — Member States must honour their obligations under international law, including the UN Charter, international human rights law and international humanitarian law.

    The Pact for the Future calls on all Member States to live up to their commitments in the UN Charter, and the principles of respect for sovereignty, territorial integrity and the political independence of States.

    All grounded in international law, and a commitment to prioritizing prevention of conflict and the peaceful settlement of disputes through dialogue and diplomacy.  The Pact also recognized the critical contribution of the International Court of Justice, which celebrates its eightieth anniversary next year.

    As we mark the eightieth anniversary of our Organization and the Charter that gave it life and shape, we need to renew our commitment to the multilateral spirit of peace through diplomacy.  I look forward to working with you in this important effort, to achieve the international peace and security the people of the world need and deserve.

    MIL OSI United Nations News –

  • MIL-OSI Security: U.S. commences civil action to forfeit $7.1 million in cryptocurrency tied to oil and gas storage fraud scheme

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

    Seattle – The U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Washington today filed a civil action seeking the forfeiture of cryptocurrency valued at approximately $7.1 million seized in the investigation of an oil and gas related investment fraud scheme, announced Acting U.S. Attorney Teal Luthy Miller. The funds, part of some $97 million taken in by the coconspirators between June 2022 and July 2024, was seized by Homeland Security Investigations in December 2024.

    “The co-schemers in this fraud moved their ill-gotten gain through various cryptocurrency accounts to try to launder the money stolen from victims,” said Acting U.S. Attorney Miller. “Federal investigators and prosecutors in our office moved as quickly as possible to trace and seize the cryptocurrency so that some of the losses can be returned to victims.”

    According to the forfeiture filing and other records in the case, from at least August 2022 through August 2024, the co-schemers convinced victims to send money to what was represented as escrow accounts to purchase oil tank storage in either Rotterdam, Netherlands, or Houston. The schemers indicated that the investors could make significant profits by renting the oil tank storage they obtained to others. The victims sent money to accounts linked to these entities: Sea Forest International LLC; Apex Oil and Gas Trading LLC; Navigator Energy Logistics LLC; Terminal Energy International Escrow Service LLC; Energo Horizons Logistics (EA) LLC; Legacy Energy Logistics Transport Group LLC; Green Tree Gateway LLC. However once victims sent their money, they were not sent any further information on their investment and co-schemers simply stopped responding.

    Newcastle, Washington resident Geoffrey K. Auyeung, 47, was indicted in August 2024 as the coconspirator in the U.S. who is charged with receiving much of the fraud proceeds generated by the fraud scheme. The money was quickly moved to one or more of at least 81 different accounts at financial institutions, moved offshore, or moved to one or more of at least 19 different cryptocurrency accounts, where it was used for the purchase of cryptocurrencies, including Bitcoin, Tether, USD Coin, and Ethereum. Much of the cryptocurrency was further transferred to accounts at the cryptocurrency exchange Binance.

    According to the forfeiture filing, the cryptocurrency accounts that were seized were linked to individuals in Russia and Nigeria. Some of the cryptocurrency purchased with victims’ funds was also sent to cryptocurrency exchanges in Russia and Nigeria, at least one of which is alleged to have facilitated money laundering for transnational criminal organizations – including terrorist organizations and organizations that violate international trade sanctions.

    At the time of Auyeung’s arrest and indictment, some $2.3 million was seized from his bank accounts. The $7.1 million in cryptocurrency the government is seeking to forfeit is in addition to the $2.3 million.

    Should the court approve the forfeiture the money will be distributed to victims in the case. Currently. Investigators have identified dozens of victims who were defrauded out of approximately $17.9 million. Investigators believe those numbers will continue to grow as more victims are identified and verified.

    The case is being investigated by HSI.

    The case is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorneys Jehiel Baer and Yunah Chung.

    MIL Security OSI –

  • MIL-OSI Russia: China’s non-bank financial sector recorded $127.3 billion in cross-border capital inflows in the first half of the year

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: People’s Republic of China in Russian – People’s Republic of China in Russian –

    An important disclaimer is at the bottom of this article.

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    BEIJING, July 22 (Xinhua) — China’s non-bank financial sector saw cross-border capital inflows of $127.3 billion in the first half of 2025, maintaining the trend of net inflows that began in the second half of last year, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange said Tuesday.

    According to the agency, non-bank financial institutions, including enterprises and individuals, recorded cross-border income and expenses of $7.6 trillion, a historical maximum for the same period. Notably, the yuan accounted for about 53 percent of cross-border settlements.

    The agency said China’s balance of payments remains balanced and the country’s foreign exchange market continues to operate stably and orderly. -0-

    Please note: This information is raw content obtained directly from the source of the information. It is an accurate report of what the source claims and does not necessarily reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    .

    MIL OSI Russia News –

  • MIL-OSI United Nations: ‘Peace is a choice’: UN chief urges diplomacy as wars spread from Gaza to Ukraine

    Source: United Nations 2

    This is the only sustainable path to global security, he told ministers at a high-level open debate of the Security Council on Tuesday.

    The Secretary-General emphasised that the UN Charter’s tools – negotiation, mediation, conciliation, arbitration and more – remain a lifeline when tensions escalate, grievances fester and states lose trust in each other.

    These tools are needed now more than ever, he stressed, as conflicts rage and international law is violated with impunity.

    “The cost is staggering – measured in human lives, shattered communities and lost futures. We need look no further than the horror show in Gaza – with a level of death and destruction without parallel in recent times.”

    The risk of starvation looms and aid operations are being denied the space and safety to function. UN premises, such as the UN Office for Project Services (UNOPS) and the World Health Organization (WHO)’s main warehouse, have been hit despite parties being notified of their locations.

    “These premises are inviolable and must be protected under international humanitarian law – without exception,” Mr. Guterres reiterated.

    Peace is a choice – make it

    From Gaza to Ukraine, from the Sahel to Sudan, Haiti and Myanmar, “conflict is raging, international law is being trampled, and hunger and displacement are at record levels,” he continued, adding that terrorism, violent extremism and transnational crime also remain “persistent scourges” pushing security further out of reach.

    “Peace is a choice. And the world expects the Security Council to help countries make this choice.”

    Mr. Guterres pointed to the UN Charter’s bedrock obligation in Article 2.3 that “all Members shall settle their international disputes by peaceful means”, and to Chapter VI, which empowers the Security Council to support “negotiation, enquiry, mediation, conciliation, arbitration, judicial settlement, resort to regional agencies or arrangements, or other peaceful means of their own choice.”

    Action 16 of last year’s Pact for the Future urges states to recommit to preventive diplomacy, he said, commending Pakistan – the Council President for July – for tabling a resolution encouraging fuller use of those tools, which was adopted unanimously at the meeting.

    UN Photo/Manuel Elías

    Secretary-General António Guterres addresses the Security Council high-level open debate.

    P5 must overcome divisions

    Security Council members – “in particular its permanent members” – must overcome divisions, the Secretary-General said, reminding them that even during the Cold War, Council dialogue underpinned peacekeeping missions and humanitarian access, and helped prevent a third world war.

    He urged members to keep channels open, build consensus and make the body “more representative” of today’s geopolitical realities with more inclusive, transparent and accountable working methods.

    Mr. Guterres also urged deeper cooperation with regional and subregional organizations.

    Mediation can work even amid war, he said, noting the third anniversary of the Black Sea Initiative and a related memorandum with Russia that enabled grain movements during the conflict in Ukraine.

    Renew commitment to multilateralism

    States must honour their obligations under the Charter; international human rights, refugee and humanitarian law, and the principles of sovereignty, territorial integrity and political independence, Mr. Guterres said.

    “As we mark the 80th anniversary of our Organization and the Charter that gave it life and shape, we need to renew our commitment to the multilateral spirit of peace through diplomacy,” he said.

    “I look forward to working with you to achieve the international peace and security the people of the world need and deserve.”

    Security Council open debate

    A signature event of the Pakistani presidency, Tuesday’s open debate was chaired by Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Mohammad Ishaq Dar.

    The session aimed to assess the effectiveness of existing mechanisms for pacific dispute settlement, examine best practices and explore new strategies for tackling protracted conflicts.

    It also sought to enhance cooperation with regional organizations, boost capacity-building and resource mobilisation, and align future efforts with the conflict-prevention vision outlined in the Pact for the Future.

    MIL OSI United Nations News –

  • MIL-OSI United Nations: Supercharging Clean Energy Will Repair Humankind’s Relationship with Climate, Fuel Economic Growth, Secretary-General Says, Noting $2 Trillion Invested in 2024

    Source: United Nations General Assembly and Security Council

    Following is UN Secretary-General António Guterres’ address on climate action “A Moment of Opportunity:  Supercharging the Clean Energy Age”, in New York today:

    The headlines are dominated by a world in trouble.  By conflict and climate chaos.  By rising human suffering.  By growing geopolitical divides.  But amidst the turmoil, another story is being written.  And its implications will be profound.

    Throughout history, energy has shaped the destiny of humankind — from mastering fire to harnessing steam to splitting the atom.  Now, we are on the cusp of a new era.  Fossil fuels are running out of road.  The sun is rising on a clean energy age.

    Just follow the money.  Two trillion dollars went into clean energy last year — that’s $800 billion more than fossil fuels and up almost 70 per cent in 10 years.  And new data released today from the International Renewable Energy Agency shows that solar — not so long ago four times the cost of fossil fuels — is now 41 per cent cheaper.  Offshore wind — 53 per cent. And over 90 per cent of new renewables worldwide produced electricity for less than the cheapest new fossil fuel alternative.

    This is not just a shift in power.  This is a shift in possibility.  Yes, in repairing our relationship with the climate.  Already, the carbon emissions saved by solar and wind globally are almost equivalent to what the whole European Union produces in a year.

    But this transformation is fundamentally about energy security and people’s security.  It’s about smart economics.  Decent jobs, public health, advancing the Sustainable Development Goals.  And delivering clean and affordable energy to everyone, everywhere.

    Today, we are releasing a special report with the support of UN agencies and partners — the International Energy Agency, the International Monetary Fund (IMF), International Renewable Energy Agency, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) and the World Bank.

    The report shows how far we have come in the decade since the Paris Agreement sparked a clean energy revolution.  And it highlights the vast benefits — and actions needed — to accelerate a just transition globally.

    Renewables already nearly match fossil fuels in global installed power capacity.  And that’s just the beginning.  Last year, almost all the new power capacity built came from renewables.  And every continent on Earth added more renewables capacity than fossil fuels.  The clean energy future is no longer a promise.  It’s a fact.  No government.  No industry. No special interest can stop it.

    Of course, the fossil fuel lobby of some fossil fuel companies will try — and we know the lengths to which they will go. But I have never been more confident that they will fail — because we have passed the point of no return.

    For three powerful reasons.  First, market economics.  For decades, emissions and economic growth rose together.  No more.  In many advanced economies, emissions have peaked, but growth continues.

    In 2023 alone, clean energy sectors drove 10 per cent of global gross domestic product (GDP) growth.  In India, 5 per cent.  The United States, 6 per cent.  China — a leader in the energy transition — 20 per cent.  And in the European Union, nearly 33 per cent.  And clean energy sector jobs now outnumber fossil fuel jobs — employing almost 35 million people worldwide.

    Even Texas — the heart of the American fossil fuel industry — now leads the United States in renewables.  Why?  Because it makes economic sense.

    And yet fossil fuels still enjoy a 9-to-1 advantage in consumption subsidies globally — a clear market distortion.  Add to that the unaccounted costs of climate damages on people and planet — and the distortion is even greater.

    Countries that cling to fossil fuels are not protecting their economies — they are sabotaging them.  Driving up costs.  Undermining competitiveness.  Locking in stranded assets.  And missing the greatest economic opportunity of the twenty-first century.

    Second — renewables are here to stay because they are the foundation of energy security and sovereignty. Let’s be clear:  The greatest threat to energy security today is in fossil fuels.  They leave economies and people at the mercy of price shocks, supply disruptions and geopolitical turmoil.  Just look at Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.  A war in Europe led to a global energy crisis.  Oil and gas prices soared.  Electricity and food bills followed.  In 2022 average households around the world saw energy costs jump 20 per cent.

    Modern and competitive economies need stable, affordable energy. Renewables offer both.  There are no price spikes for sunlight.  No embargoes on wind.  Renewables can put power — literally and figuratively — in the hands of people and governments.  And almost every nation has enough sun, wind, or water to become energy self-sufficient.  Renewables mean real energy security.  Real energy sovereignty.  And real freedom from fossil-fuel volatility.

    The third and final reason why there is no going back on renewables: Easy access.  You can’t build a coal plant in someone’s backyard.  But you can deliver solar panels to the most remote village on Earth.  Solar and wind can be deployed faster, cheaper and more flexibly than fossil fuels ever could.  And while nuclear will be part of the global energy mix, it can never fill the access gaps.

    All of this is a game changer for the hundreds of millions of people still living without electricity — most of them in Africa, a continent bursting with renewable potential. By 2040, Africa could generate 10 times more electricity than it needs — entirely from renewables.

    We are already seeing small-scale and off-grid renewable technologies lighting homes, and powering schools and businesses in remote areas.  And in places like Pakistan for example, people power is fuelling a solar surge — consumers are driving the clean energy boom.

    The energy transition is unstoppable.  But the transition is not yet fast enough or fair enough.  OECD countries and China account for 80 per cent of renewable power capacity installed worldwide.  Brazil and India make up nearly 10 per cent.  Africa — just 1.5 per cent.

    Meanwhile, the climate crisis is laying waste to lives and livelihoods.  Climate disasters in small island States have wiped out over 100 per cent of GDP.  In the United States, they are pushing insurance premiums through the roof.

    And the 1.5-degree limit is in unprecedented peril.  To keep it within reach, we must drastically speed up the reduction of emissions — and the reach of the clean energy transition.  With manufacturing capacity racing, prices plummeting, and COP30 [Thirtieth Session of the Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change] fast approaching…  This is our moment of opportunity.  We must seize it.  We can do so by taking action in six opportunity areas.

    First — by using new national climate plans to go all-out on the energy transition.  Too often, governments send mixed messages:  Bold renewable targets on one day.  New fossil fuel subsidies and expansions the next.

    The next national climate plans, or NDCs, are due in a matter of months.  They must bring clarity and certainty.  Group of Twenty (G20) countries must lead. They produce 80 per cent of global emissions.  The principle of common but differentiated responsibilities must apply but every country must do more.  Ahead of COP30 in Brazil this November, they must submit new plans.

    I invite leaders to present their new NDCs at an event I will host in September, during General Assembly High-level week.   These must: cover all emissions, across the entire economy; align with the 1.5-degree limit; integrate energy, climate and sustainable development priorities into one coherent vision; and deliver on global promises to double energy efficiency and triple renewables capacity by 2030, and to accelerate the transition away from fossil fuels.  These plans must be backed by long-term road maps for a just transition to net-zero energy systems — in line with global net-zero by 2050.

    And they must be underpinned by policies that show that the clean energy future is not just inevitable — but investable.  Policies that create clear regulations and a pipeline of projects.  That enhance public-private partnerships — unlocking capital and innovation.  That put a meaningful price on carbon.  And that end subsidies and international public finance for fossil fuels — as promised.

    Second, this is our moment of opportunity to build the energy systems of the twenty-first century.  The technology is moving ahead.  In just 15 years, the cost of battery storage systems for electricity grids has dropped over 90 per cent.

    But here’s the problem.  Investments in the right infrastructure are not keeping up.  For every dollar invested in renewable power, just 60 cents go to grids and storage.  That ratio should be one-to-one.

    We are building renewable power — but not connecting it fast enough.  There’s three times more renewable energy waiting to be plugged into grids than was added last year.  And fossil fuels still dominate the global total energy mix.

    We must act now and invest in the backbone of a clean energy future:  In modern, flexible and digital grids — including regional integration.  In a massive scale-up of energy storage.  In charging networks — to power the electric vehicle revolution.

    On the other hand, we need energy efficiency but also electrification — across buildings, transport and industry. This is how we unlock the full promise of renewables — and build energy systems that are clean, secure and fit for the future.

    Third, this is our moment of opportunity to meet the world’s surging energy demand sustainably.  More people are plugging in.  More cities are heating up — with soaring demand for cooling.  And more technologies — from AI to digital finance — are devouring electricity.  Governments must aim to meet all new electricity demand with renewables.

    AI can boost efficiency, innovation and resilience in energy systems.  And we must take profit in it.  But it is also energy hungry.  A typical AI data centre eats up as much electricity as 100,000 homes.  The largest ones will soon use 20 times that.  By 2030, data centres could consume as much electricity as all of Japan does today.

    This is not sustainable — unless we make it so.  And the technology sector must be out front.  Today I call on every major tech firm to power all data centres with 100 per cent renewables by 2030.

    And — along with other industries — they must use water sustainably in cooling systems.  The future is being built in the cloud.  It must be powered by the sun, the wind and the promise of a better world.

    Fourth, this is the moment of opportunity for a just energy transition. The clean energy that we must deliver must also deliver equity, dignity and opportunity for all.

    That means governments leading a just transition.  With support, education and training — for fossil fuel workers, young people, women, Indigenous Peoples and others — so that they can thrive in the new energy economy.  With stronger social protection — so no one is left behind.  And with international cooperation to help low-income countries that are highly-dependent on fossil fuels and struggling to make the shift.

    But justice doesn’t stop here.  The critical minerals that power the clean energy revolution are often found in countries that have long been exploited.  And today, we see history repeating.  Communities mistreated.  Rights trampled.  Environments trashed.  Nations stuck at the bottom of value chains — while others reap rewards.  And extractive models digging deeper holes of inequality and harm.  This must end.

    Developing countries can play a major role in diversifying sources of supply. The UN Panel on Critical Energy Transition Minerals has shown the way forward — with a path grounded in human rights, justice and equity.

    Today, I call on governments, businesses and civil society to work with us to deliver its recommendations.  Let’s build a future that is not only green — but just.  Not only fast — but fair.  Not only transformative — but inclusive.

    Fifth, we have a moment of opportunity to use trade and investment to supercharge the energy transition.  Clean energy needs more than ambition.  It needs access — to technologies, materials and manufacturing.

    But these are concentrated in just a few countries.  And global trade is fragmenting.

    Trade policy must support climate policy.  Countries committed to the new energy era must come together to ensure that trade and investment drive it forward.  By building diverse, secure and resilient supply chains.  By cutting tariffs on clean energy goods.  By unlocking investment and trade — including through South-South cooperation. And by modernizing outdated investment treaties — starting with Investor-State Dispute Settlement provisions.

    Today, fossil fuel interests are weaponizing these provisions to delay the transition, particularly in several developing countries.  Reform is urgent.  The race for the new must not be a race for the few.  It must be a relay — shared, inclusive and resilient.  Let’s make trade a tool for transformation.

    Sixth and finally, this is our moment of opportunity to unleash the full force of finance — driving investment to markets with massive potential.  Despite soaring demand and vast renewables potential — developing countries are being locked out of the energy transition.

    Africa is home to 60 per cent of the world’s best solar resources.  But it received just 2 per cent of global clean energy investment last year.  Zoom out, and the picture is just as stark.

    In the last decade, only 1 in every 5 clean energy dollars went to emerging and developing countries outside China.  To keep the 1.5-degree limit alive — and deliver universal energy access – annual clean energy investment in those countries must rise more than fivefold by 2030.

    That demands bold national policies.  And concrete international action to:  Reform the global financial architecture.  Drastically increase the lending capacity of multilateral development banks — making them bigger, bolder and better able to leverage massive amounts of private finance at reasonable costs.  And take effective action on debt relief — and scale up proven tools like debt for climate swaps.

    Today, developing countries pay outlandish sums for both debt and equity financing — in part because of outdated risk models, bias and broken assumptions that boost the cost of capital.  Credit ratings agencies and investors must modernize.

    We need a new approach to risk that reflects:  the promise of clean energy; the rising cost of climate chaos; and the danger of stranded fossil fuel assets.  I urge parties to unite to solve the complex challenges facing some developing countries in the energy transition — such as early retirement of coal plants.

    The fossil fuel age is flailing and failing.  We are in the dawn of a new energy era.  An era where cheap, clean, abundant energy powers a world rich in economic opportunity.  Where nations have the security of energy autonomy.  And the gift of power is a gift for all.

    That world is within reach.  But it won’t happen on its own.  Not fast enough.  Not fair enough.  It is up to us.  We have the tools to power the future for humanity.  Let’s make the most of them.  This is our moment of opportunity.

    MIL OSI United Nations News –

  • MIL-OSI Russia: US announces withdrawal from UNESCO again

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: People’s Republic of China in Russian – People’s Republic of China in Russian –

    An important disclaimer is at the bottom of this article.

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    WASHINGTON, July 22 (Xinhua) — The United States on Tuesday announced its decision to withdraw from the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), two years after rejoining it.

    According to a statement from the US State Department, the decision was made in connection with UNESCO’s policy, which Washington believes “promotes divisive social and cultural initiatives” against the backdrop of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

    “UNESCO’s decision to admit the ‘State of Palestine’ as a member state is highly problematic, runs counter to US policy and contributes to the spread of anti-Israeli rhetoric within the organization,” the statement said.

    The US withdrawal from UNESCO will take effect at the end of December 2026.

    This is the third time the United States has withdrawn from the organization, and the second time during the Donald Trump administration. Since the start of Trump’s second term this year, his administration has already announced withdrawals from the Paris Climate Agreement, the World Health Organization, and the UN Human Rights Council. –0–

    Please note: This information is raw content obtained directly from the source of the information. It is an accurate report of what the source claims and does not necessarily reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    .

    MIL OSI Russia News –

  • MIL-OSI Russia: China issues regulations on rural highways

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: People’s Republic of China in Russian – People’s Republic of China in Russian –

    An important disclaimer is at the bottom of this article.

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    BEIJING, July 22 (Xinhua) — Chinese State Council Premier Li Qiang signed a State Council order on issuing regulations to promote high-quality development of rural highways and ensure that they meet the needs of comprehensive rural revitalization and accelerated agricultural and rural modernization.

    The regulations on rural highways, which will take effect on September 15, stipulate that the development of rural highways should be in line with China’s coordinated efforts to promote new-type urbanization and all-round rural revitalization.

    The document notes the need to adhere to the principle of equal attention to construction, management, maintenance and operation, gradually improving a comprehensive, accessible, safe, practical, convenient and efficient rural transport infrastructure network.

    It is stated that the quality of rural highway networks should be improved and their connections with national and provincial highways should be ensured to promote the integration of urban and rural transportation. Existing rural highways that do not meet the minimum technical requirements should be upgraded.

    The document provides for strengthening the management and maintenance of rural roads through a clear division of responsibilities, and also requires regular inspections and the identification of hidden safety threats.

    As emphasized in the regulations, local governments at all levels should promote the integrated construction of rural roads and related infrastructure facilities, industrial parks and tourist attractions located along them, which will promote the comprehensive development of rural passenger transportation, freight logistics, postal services and express delivery, and enhance the ability of rural roads to serve economic circulation between urban and rural areas. –0–

    Please note: This information is raw content obtained directly from the source of the information. It is an accurate report of what the source claims and does not necessarily reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    .

    MIL OSI Russia News –