Category: Taxation

  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: LCQ15: Training of artificial intelligence talents

    Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region

    Following is a question by the Hon Rock Chen and a written reply by the Secretary for Education, Dr Choi Yuk-lin, in the Legislative Council today (May 14):

    Question:

    In September last year, the State President delivered an important speech at the National Conference on Education, following which the 2024-2035 master plan on building China into a leading country in education (the master plan) was issued, setting out a roadmap for the national education development in the next 10 years. The master plan clearly proposed to establish a mechanism for co-ordinating and promoting the integration of education, technology and talent by leveraging the support of education to technology and talent. The master plan also set out the close collaboration with the development of the innovation and technology (I&T) hub in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area (GBA) and the building of a high-calibre talent hub and platforms for talent attraction and retention, thereby enhancing the overall effectiveness of the innovation system. In this connection, will the Government inform this Council:

    (1) against the background of the master plan’s proposals to establish a mechanism for co-ordinating and promoting the integration of education, technology and talent as well as to closely collaborate with the development of I&T hub in the GBA, how the Government will further deepen the collaboration among the “government, industry, academic and research” sectors to promote the transformation of research and development outcomes of tertiary institutions into a driving force for innovation in the industry, with a view to enhancing Hong Kong’s competitiveness in the GBA’s I&T ecosystem;

    (2) as there are views that universities of applied sciences (UAS) play an important role in Hong Kong in complementing the master plan’s proposal to leverage the support of education to technology and talent, how the Government will further define the self-positioning of UAS and assist UAS in leveraging their unique advantages, so as to nurture more applied technology talents who suit the needs of the industries in the GBA;

    (3) how the Government plans to assist tertiary institutions and scientific research institutions in increasing their expenditure on research and development (R&D) and intensifying the efforts in nurturing talents in the field of artificial intelligence (AI), so that Hong Kong can contribute to the development of the I&T hub in the GBA in the aspect of AI technology’s R&D and application; and

    (4) whether it has studied how the Government should further strengthen STEAM (i.e. Science, Technology, Engineering, the Arts and Mathematics) education in primary and secondary schools (particularly focusing on AI), including teaching basic AI knowledge, methods of data processing and interdisciplinary knowledge, so as to enhance students’ skills in AI, critical thinking and capacity for innovation, thereby meeting the demand for education, technology and talent arising from the GBA development?

    Reply:

    President,

    Solid promotion of education and technological development can provide and replenish talents and manpower for various trades and industries, boost socio-economic development, and render firm support for building an international hub for high-calibre talents. The 2024-2035 master plan on building China into a leading country in education, issued earlier by the nation, clearly proposes establishing an integrated co-ordinating mechanism for education, technology and talents, and strengthen the supporting role of education for science and talents. To this end, the Government has set up the Committee on Education, Technology and Talents, which is led by the Chief Secretary for Administration, to co-ordinate and drive the integrated development of education, technology and talents, expand connections, formulate policies to attract and cultivate talents, foster the development of technologies, and also promote Hong Kong as an international hub for high-calibre talents.

    The replies of the Education Bureau (EDB) and the Innovation, Technology and Industry Bureau to the Hon Rock Chen’s questions are as follows:

    (1) With an aim to enhance the innovation and technology (I&T) ecosystem and Hong Kong’s competitiveness on the I&T front in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area (GBA), the Government has been promoting collaboration among the Government, industry, academic and research sectors through various measures, and adopting a multi-pronged approach to support commercialisation of research and development (R&D) outcomes of tertiary institutions. For example, the $10 billion Research, Academic and Industry Sectors One-plus Scheme under the Innovation and Technology Fund (ITF) funds, on a matching basis, research teams from universities with good potential to become successful start-ups to transform and commercialise their R&D outcomes, while industry sponsorship is a mandatory requirement. Furthermore, the ITF will continue to provide annual funding to the Technology Transfer Office of each of the eight University Grants Committee (UGC)-funded universities, thereby supporting the development of innovative ideas and R&D outcomes into new products or services. The R&D centres set up by the Government have also been taking forward industry-driven applied R&D work that suits market needs and transferring technologies to the industries through contract researches, licensing arrangements, etc to commercialise their R&D outcomes. Meanwhile, the Government has facilitated the establishment of the Hong Kong New Industrialisation Development Alliance. The Alliance serves as a platform for collaboration among the Government, industry, academia, research and investment sectors, with a view to promoting new industrialisation and co-operation among enterprises and organisations.

    (2) To provide an alternative pathway to success for young people who aspire to pursue careers in professional skills sectors, the Government has been promoting the establishment of universities of applied sciences (UAS), and, in February 2024, promulgated the criteria for qualifying as UAS along with the relevant mechanisms. UAS provide vocational and professional education and training (VPET) programmes with an applied focus blending theory and practice, including applied degree programmes, and closely collaborate with professional skills sectors, incorporating substantial internship and work-based learning opportunities in other degree programmes to nurture students’ applied skills, demonstrating a clear division of labour with traditional academic research universities. The EDB announced in March and November 2024 respectively that Hong Kong Metropolitan University and Saint Francis University had been confirmed as the first two UAS in Hong Kong after undergoing stringent procedures and reviews.

    The Government proactively supports UAS to collaborate with industries and other stakeholders in accordance with the VPET development strategy of fostering industry-institution collaboration and diversified development to respond to the keen manpower needs of different sectors and nurture more professional talent with applied skills. In this connection, the Government has allocated $100 million to support UAS and VPET institutions to establish the Alliance of UAS (the Alliance) in November 2024. The Alliance has been actively engaging supporting organisations and stakeholders and has drawn up the future work plan and strategic direction, which include fostering collaboration and joint promotion efforts among member institutions and over 80 supporting organisations from different sectors, organising international conferences, and strengthening exchanges and co-operation with Mainland and overseas UAS. Amongst others, the Alliance has planned to visit VPET institutions in the GBA within the year to strengthen exchanges and co-operation. The EDB will continue to work closely with the Alliance to support its work.

    (3) Strengthening the nurturing of local I&T talents and fostering the deep integration of technology and industry are key factors in advancing the development of the artificial intelligence (AI) industry. Taking the opportunity of the triennial planning exercise for the UGC-funded universities, the Government set out strategic directions to guide the universities to align their planning with our nation’s and Hong Kong’s strategic development and policy priorities, including nurturing talents for growth, transformation and future challenges.

    With the advent of AI, innovative and breakthrough technology in the new era, the universities are encouraged to introduce appropriate teaching frameworks and new programmes to meet ever-changing societal needs and enhance support for academic staff and students. A number of UGC-funded universities have offered AI-related undergraduate programmes in the 2025-28 triennium in response to the strategic directions, for example, Bachelor of Science (Honours) in Artificial Intelligence and Educational Technology and Bachelor of Education (Honours) (Primary) – Mathematics of the Education University of Hong Kong, Bachelor of Engineering in Artificial Intelligence of the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, and Bachelor of Arts and Bachelor of Engineering in Artificial Intelligence and Data Science of the University of Hong Kong.

    In addition, the Government has been developing the AI ecosystem on different fronts through various measures such as provision of infrastructure and computing power, promoting R&D and talent cultivation. The first-phase facility of Cyberport’s Artificial Intelligence Supercomputing Centre (AISC) commenced operation to meet the strong local demand and enhance Hong Kong’s R&D capabilities in various technological research and application fields. With a view to encouraging the industry to optimise the AISC’s computing resources, the Government launched the Artificial Intelligence Subsidy Scheme to subsidise local institutions, R&D centres and enterprises, etc to leverage the AISC’s computing power to achieve scientific breakthroughs and launch promotional and educational activities. As of April 2025, Cyberport has organised 35 promotional activities (including information seminars at local institutions), attracting over 6 500 participants. The Government is also nurturing local talents and gathering top-notch researchers from all around the world, through the AIR@InnoHK research cluster and its R&D laboratories focusing on AI and robotic technologies. To further promote the R&D and applications of AI in Hong Kong, the 2025-26 Budget announced the establishment of the Hong Kong Artificial Intelligence Research and Development Institute (AIRDI), which will spearhead and support Hong Kong’s innovative R&D and industry applications of AI, facilitating upstream R&D, midstream and downstream transformation of R&D outcomes, and expanding application scenarios. We expect the AIRDI will help pool talents in AI-related fields, promote R&D and extensive application of AI, and facilitate exchanges on AI between Hong Kong and the Mainland (including the GBA) as well as overseas countries and regions.

    The Finance Committee of the Legislative Council approved on May 9 a funding of $3 billion for the implementation of the Frontier Technology Research Support Scheme, with a view to attracting international top-notch talents in frontier technology areas such as AI to conduct research in Hong Kong, thereby expanding Hong Kong’s research capacity. The eligible applicant institutions for the Scheme are local universities funded by the UGC, and funding will be provided to the institutions concerned on a matching basis to encourage them to invest in research, promote cross-sector collaboration and enhance manpower training.

    (4) To align with the national strategy of building a leading country in education, keeping pace with global development trends, and nurturing talents for the advancement of I&T in Hong Kong, the EDB has been stepping up to promote STEAM (Science, Technology, Engineering, the Arts and Mathematics) education in primary and secondary schools, further promoting the digitalisation of education. Through a range of diversified strategies, including ongoing curriculum renewal, strengthening teacher training, providing resource support to schools, and enhancing collaboration with stakeholders, the EDB seeks to integrate digital technology into learning and teaching, enhance students’ creativity and problem-solving skills, and lay a solid foundation of talent for the future development of the country and society. Additionally, the EDB established the Steering Committee on Strategic Development of Digital Education in early 2025, making reference to the latest developments on the Mainland and relevant policies and experiences from other countries, to propose recommendations on the goals, strategies and future directions for the implementation of digital education in Hong Kong.

    Regarding curriculum renewal, the EDB launched the “Module on Artificial Intelligence for Junior Secondary Level” in the 2023/24 school year that covers topics such as AI basics and AI ethics. The EDB also launched the “Enriched Module on Coding Education for Upper Primary Level” to enhance computational thinking and creative thinking. At present, almost all publicly-funded primary and secondary schools have implemented enriched coding education and AI education at the upper primary and the junior secondary levels respectively. On the other hand, the newly introduced Primary Science and the updated Junior Secondary Science will be implemented starting from the 2025/26 and 2027/28 school years respectively. Both curricula emphasise inquiry-based learning and cross-disciplinary learning, with a view to cultivating students’ capabilities in innovation.

    As for teacher training, the EDB focuses on empowering teachers by helping them equipping with AI-related knowledge and teaching strategies. The EDB continuously organises training programmes on the aforementioned AI and coding education modules, covering fundamental AI theories, applied technologies, pedagogical practices, data security, and the use of generative AI in education. These training sessions are conducted in both online and face-to-face modes to broaden participation and coverage among teachers. Furthermore, the EDB promotes the application of AI in learning and teaching through an “AI+Subject” approach and provides relevant teacher training. Examples include the launch of the “AI for Science Education” programme in Junior Secondary Science, the integration of digital technologies (including AI elements) into mathematical modelling activities in Mathematics, and the incorporation of AI into learning and teaching activities in Visual Arts. These efforts aim to enhance teachers’ confidence and competence in utilising AI to assist teaching.

    The EDB also provides various resource support to schools. The EDB updated the “Information Literacy for Hong Kong Students” Learning Framework to strengthen data security and AI ethics education, and collaborated with the Hong Kong Police Force and the Journalism Education Foundation to launch teaching resources on cyber security and media and information literacy, to help students to develop critical thinking skills when using I&T. Moreover, the Quality Education Fund has allocated $500 million for the implementation of the e-Learning Ancillary Facilities Programme, supporting 22 projects related to AI, big data and education technology. These projects cover various subjects and deploy innovative technologies to enhance learning and teaching effectiveness. As at end-March 2025, around 400 schools and 31 000 students have participated in this programme. It is expected that the deliverables of the projects will be successively released starting from mid-2025 for subscriptions and use by all local schools.

    The EDB actively promotes collaboration and exchange by deepening partnerships with local, Mainland, and international stakeholders. The EDB works closely with tertiary institutions and I&T-related organisations to conduct various projects and activities, enabling school leaders and teachers to stay abreast of the latest developments in science and I&T. Examples include the “Exchange cum Training Programme for Hong Kong STEAM Education Leaders”, co-organised with the Teacher Education Centre under the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, and the “Professional Development Programme on Innovation and Technology”, co-organised with Cyberport. In collaboration with Hong Kong Education City, the EDB is organising the “Digital Education Week” from June 30 to July 7 this year. Key events include the “Learning & Teaching Expo”, and the International Summit on the Use of AI in Learning and Teaching Languages and Other Subjects & Post-Summit Workshop Series jointly hosted with the Standing Committee on Language Education and Research and the Hong Kong Polytechnic University. The events will invite experts to share insights on I&T education (including the use of AI in teaching) to promote the integration of AI in education.

    The EDB will actively align with the competencies and skills required by national and global trends. In close collaboration with stakeholders from various sectors, the EDB aims to strengthen basic education in primary and secondary schools. To dovetail the integrated development of “education, science and technology, and talent” advocated by our country, the EDB is committed to nurturing the next generation of innovators in science and technology.

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News

  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: LCQ20: Taxi Fleet Regime

    Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region

    ​Following is a question by the Hon Andrew Lam and a written reply by the Secretary for Transport and Logistics, Ms Mable Chan, in the Legislative Council today (May 14):

    Question:

    The Road Traffic Legislation (Enhancing Personalised Point-to-point Transport Services) (Amendment) Bill 2023, which, among others, seeks to introduce a Taxi Fleet Regime, was passed by this Council in December 2023. Subsequently, in July last year, the Government announced that conditional grants of the Taxi Fleet Licence were issued to five applicants, requiring them to complete the gearing-up work and commence services within one year. However, it has been reported that to date no fleets have officially commenced operations and that only two fleets are operating on a trial basis. In this connection, will the Government inform this Council:

    (1) of the current number of taxis that each of the five fleets can provide for services; the respective difference between such numbers and the minimum number of taxis required under the Taxi Fleet Licence;

    (2) whether it has reviewed the reasons why three of the taxi fleets have not yet commenced trial operations and the two fleets currently undergoing trial operations have not officially commenced operations since the issuance of the conditional grants of the Taxi Fleet Licence; of the respective expected dates for the five fleets to officially commence operations; and

    (3) whether the authorities have formulated a plan to deal with situations where the aforementioned taxi fleets are unable to officially commence operations by the dates specified in the conditional grants; if so, of the details of the plan; if not, the reasons for that?

    Reply:

    President,

    The Government has earlier reviewed the overall operation and management of taxis, and introduced a series of measures to enhance the quality of taxi service, including the introduction of a new regulatory regime – the taxi fleet regime. With regard to the question raised by the Hon Andrew Lam, I hereby reply as follows:

    (1) Upon open application and assessment by the Transport Department (TD), five operators were issued with conditional grants of the Taxi Fleet Licence in end-July 2024. The selected applicants include three urban fleets and two mixed fleets, with a fleet size of 300 to 1 000 taxis each, providing a total of over 3 500 taxis, which account for over one-sixth of the 18 163 taxis in Hong Kong and include around 300 wheelchair-accessible taxis and 1 000 premium taxis.

    According to the conditional grants of the Taxi Fleet Licence, the five selected operators are required to complete the gearing-up work and commence service by end-July this year. At the time of service commencement, the size of each fleet shall reach at least 60 per cent of the total number of taxis committed to be deployed by such fleet.

    Among the five taxi fleets, two fleets (SynCab and Joie Taxi) have been operating on a trial basis, with a view to gaining operation experiences, collecting passenger feedback, and allowing passengers to experience their services first-hand. It is understood that SynCab and Joie have deployed around 300 taxis altogether for trial operation. The remaining three taxi fleets are fully engaged in the gearing-up work, and drivers and taxi owners are joining the fleets one after another.

    (2) and (3) Since July last year, the five selected operators have been conducting gearing-up work with great endeavour, including purchasing new vehicles and carrying out modifications, installing in-vehicle technological devices for enhancement of driving safety, setting up electronic payment systems, developing and testing online hailing applications, recruiting drivers, providing training to drivers, etc.

    The TD has been holding regular meetings with the fleets to actively promote and assist their gearing-up work, while coordinating and providing support based on their needs during the preparatory stage. For example, in response to the need of various operators to acquire new models of vehicles for use as fleet taxis, the TD has, on the premise of ensuring road safety, streamlined the procedures by introducing batch applications and vehicle examinations and providing facilitating measures in respect of the vehicle examination arrangements.

    We understand that taxi fleet is a new type of service, and some taxi owners and drivers may not understand the operation of the fleets and therefore are hesitant to join the fleets. This has led to various challenges for the fleet operators in conducting the gearing-up work, for example regarding driver recruitment and engagement of taxi owners. At present, two of the fleet operators have started trial operations. Such operations not only allow these fleets to collect passenger feedback but also provide a valuable opportunity for trade members to understand the operation of fleets, which is beneficial to attracting more taxi owners and drivers to join the fleet. Additionally, it is understood that the fleet operators have implemented different measures to recruit taxi owners and drivers, such as hosting fleet introduction sessions and recruitment events, organising activities to showcase the new taxi models and new fleet management approach to taxi owners, offering referral bonuses and driving safety bonuses to drivers, and implementing flexible work schedules. We hope that the fleet operators will continue to adopt various strategies to recruit taxi owners and drivers. The TD will also maintain close communication with the fleets, and actively facilitate their completion of the gearing-up work for the commissioning of taxi fleet services by end-July this year. Furthermore, apart from the launching of the respective online booking channels by the fleets, we understand that a third-party technology provider is discussing with the fleets the launching of a centralised online hailing platform to make it more convenient for the public to book fleet taxis. The Government will continue to encourage the fleets to take forward the relevant work.

    We aim to introduce systematic management and technology-driven fleets through the taxi fleet regime, and thereby motivating the taxi trade to innovate and transform. At the same time, the Government will continue to implement other measures through a multi-pronged approach, and be determined to enhance the quality of taxi services and to promote the industry’s long-term healthy development, thereby providing passengers with taxi services of better quality. These measures include the already effective Taxi-Driver-Offence Points system and the two-tier penalty system which aim to enhance the deterrent effects against the black sheep of the industry, and the legislative proposals to mandate taxis to install in-vehicle cameras, dash cameras and global navigation satellite systems in their compartments and to provide e-payment means.

    Ends/Wednesday, May 14, 2025
    Issued at HKT 11:50

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Alternative Budget – Green’s Budget Gets Thumbs Up from Tax Reform Group

    Source: Better Taxes for a Better Future Campaign

    The Better Taxes for a Better Future Campaign welcomes the Green Party’s alternative budget released today, for recognising the need to grow revenue and ensuring that those who can afford it get to contribute more.

    “The Green Budget recognises that we face enormous challenges as a country and we need to fund government better in order to respond to them,” says Glenn Barclay, spokesperson for the Better Taxes Campaign.

    “They also promote a range of new taxes that will help ensure that we all contribute according to our ability to pay.”

    “When compared to other countries like Denmark, Germany, Austria and France we are a low tax country. At the same time we face growing inequality, an enormous infrastructure deficit, the challenges of climate change, health services that are in crisis and public services that are struggling to cope. The need to increase government revenue is urgent,” says Glenn Barclay.

    The Green’s proposals include a wealth tax, a more progressive income tax (including a tax free threshold), reversing interest deductibility for rental properties, and raising the tax on corporations.  The Green Budget stops short of introducing a full capital gains tax but restores the Bright Line Test for taxing the capital gains on housing to 10 years.

    “These changes are important steps towards a more progressive tax system. They would help address the sources of inequality in our tax system while raising more revenue,” says Glenn Barclay.

    “The lack of a full capital gains tax is interesting and we would like to better understand the rationale for this, but we do welcome the restoration of the Bright Line Test as a step in the right direction.”

    “In many ways we are outliers when you look at countries we like to compare ourselves to and most of these initiatives will just bring us into line with them”.

    “We would also encourage all parties to consider tax system reforms to ensure that multinational companies operating in New Zealand are not escaping paying tax and improve tax transparency for more effective and efficient revenue gathering.”

    The Better taxes for a Better Future Campaign was launched in June 2023 with the support of 21 partner organisations. It is seeking a tax system that:

    Is fully transparent.
    Ensures people who have more to contribute make that contribution: that we gather more revenue from wealth, gains from wealth, all forms of income, and corporates.
    Makes greater use of fair taxes to promote good health and environmental health.
    Addresses the tax impact on the least well-off in our society.
    Raises more revenue to enable us to address the social, economic and environmental challenges we face.

    MIL OSI New Zealand News

  • MIL-OSI: BlackRock® Canada Announces May Cash Distributions for the iShares® ETFs

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    TORONTO, May 14, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — BlackRock Asset Management Canada Limited (“BlackRock Canada”), an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of BlackRock, Inc. (NYSE: BLK), today announced the May 2025 cash distributions for the iShares ETFs listed on the TSX or Cboe Canada which pay on a monthly basis, as well as iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF (XIU) and iShares Canadian Real Return Bond Index ETF (XRB). Unitholders of record of the applicable iShares ETF, with exception of XRB, on May 22, 2025 will receive cash distributions payable in respect of that iShares ETF on May 30, 2025. Unitholders of record of XRB on June 2, 2025 will receive cash distributions on June 5, 2025.

    Details regarding the “per unit” distribution amounts are as follows:

    Fund Name Fund Ticker Cash Distribution Per Unit
    iShares 1-10 Year Laddered Corporate Bond Index ETF CBH $0.049
    iShares 1-5 Year Laddered Corporate Bond Index ETF CBO $0.051
    iShares S&P/TSX Canadian Dividend Aristocrats Index ETF CDZ $0.128
    iShares Equal Weight Banc & Lifeco ETF CEW $0.066
    iShares 1-5 Year Laddered Government Bond Index ETF CLF $0.032
    iShares 1-10 Year Laddered Government Bond Index ETF CLG $0.037
    iShares S&P/TSX Canadian Preferred Share Index ETF CPD $0.058
    iShares US Dividend Growers Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) CUD $0.102
    iShares Convertible Bond Index ETF CVD $0.072
    iShares Global Monthly Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) CYH $0.078
    iShares Canadian Financial Monthly Income ETF FIE $0.040
    iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF XAGG $0.105
    iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF(1) XAGG.U $0.076
    iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) XAGH $0.096
    iShares Core Canadian Universe Bond Index ETF XBB $0.079
    iShares Core Canadian Corporate Bond Index ETF XCB $0.069
    iShares ESG Advanced Canadian Corporate Bond Index ETF XCBG $0.120
    iShares U.S. IG Corporate Bond Index ETF XCBU $0.122
    iShares U.S. IG Corporate Bond Index ETF(1) XCBU.U $0.088
    iShares Core MSCI Global Quality Dividend Index ETF XDG $0.074
    iShares Core MSCI Global Quality Dividend Index ETF(1) XDG.U $0.044
    iShares Core MSCI Global Quality Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) XDGH $0.057
    iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF XDIV $0.115
    iShares Core MSCI US Quality Dividend Index ETF XDU $0.064
    iShares Core MSCI US Quality Dividend Index ETF(1) XDU.U $0.046
    iShares Core MSCI US Quality Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) XDUH $0.055
    iShares Canadian Select Dividend Index ETF XDV $0.108
    iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) XEB $0.059
    iShares S&P/TSX Composite High Dividend Index ETF XEI $0.136
    iShares Core Canadian 15+ Year Federal Bond Index ETF XFLB $0.112
    iShares Flexible Monthly Income ETF XFLI $0.189
    iShares Flexible Monthly Income ETF(1) XFLI.U $0.136
    iShares Flexible Monthly Income ETF (CAD-Hedged) XFLX $0.183
    iShares S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index ETF XFN $0.169
    iShares Floating Rate Index ETF XFR $0.051
    iShares Core Canadian Government Bond Index ETF XGB $0.050
    iShares Global Government Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) XGGB $0.041
    iShares Canadian HYBrid Corporate Bond Index ETF XHB $0.075
    iShares U.S. High Dividend Equity Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) XHD $0.077
    iShares U.S. High Dividend Equity Index ETF XHU $0.074
    iShares U.S. High Yield Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) XHY $0.085
    iShares U.S. IG Corporate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) XIG $0.075
    iShares 1-5 Year U.S. IG Corporate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) XIGS $0.106
    iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF XIU $0.272
    iShares Core Canadian Long Term Bond Index ETF XLB $0.062
    iShares S&P/TSX North American Preferred Stock Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) XPF $0.065
    iShares High Quality Canadian Bond Index ETF XQB $0.053
    iShares Canadian Real Return Bond Index ETF XRB $0.273
    iShares S&P/TSX Capped REIT Index ETF XRE $0.062
    iShares ESG Aware Canadian Aggregate Bond Index ETF XSAB $0.048
    iShares Core Canadian Short Term Bond Index ETF XSB $0.072
    iShares Conservative Short Term Strategic Fixed Income ETF XSC $0.056
    iShares Conservative Strategic Fixed Income ETF XSE $0.052
    iShares Core Canadian Short Term Corporate Bond Index ETF XSH $0.061
    iShares ESG Advanced 1-5 Year Canadian Corporate Bond Index ETF XSHG $0.120
    iShares 1-5 Year U.S. IG Corporate Bond Index ETF XSHU $0.137
    iShares 1-5 Year U.S. IG Corporate Bond Index ETF(1) XSHU.U $0.099
    iShares Short Term Strategic Fixed Income ETF XSI $0.062
    iShares ESG Aware Canadian Short Term Bond Index ETF XSTB $0.048
    iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) XSTH $0.175
    iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond Index ETF XSTP $0.211
    iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond Index ETF(1) XSTP.U $0.152
    iShares 20+ Year U.S. Treasury Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) XTLH $0.113
    iShares 20+ Year U.S. Treasury Bond Index ETF XTLT $0.131
    iShares 20+ Year U.S. Treasury Bond Index ETF(1) XTLT.U $0.102
    iShares Diversified Monthly Income ETF XTR $0.040
    iShares S&P/TSX Capped Utilities Index ETF XUT $0.110

    (1) Distribution per unit amounts are in U.S. dollars for XAGG.U, XCBU.U, XDG.U, XDU.U, XFLI.U, XSHU.U, XSTP.U, XTLT.U

    Estimated May Cash Distributions for the iShares Premium Money Market ETF

    The May cash distributions per unit for the iShares Premium Money Market ETF are estimated to be as follows:

    Fund Name Fund Ticker Estimated Cash Distribution Per Unit
    iShares Premium Money Market ETF CMR $0.101

    BlackRock Canada expects to issue a press release on or about May 21, 2025, which will provide the final amounts for the iShares Premium Money Market ETF.

    May Reinvested Distributions for the iShares Canadian Real Return Bond Index ETF

    Fund Name

    Fund Ticker Reinvested Distribution Per Unit
    iShares Canadian Real Return Bond Index ETF XRB $0.31014

    The distributions are for the reinvested distributions, which are typically reinvested in additional units of the respective funds, and do not include ongoing semi-annual cash distribution amounts. The additional units will be immediately consolidated with the previously outstanding units such that the number of outstanding units following the distribution will equal the number of units outstanding prior to the distribution.

    Further information on the iShares Funds can be found at http://www.blackrock.com/ca.

    About BlackRock
    BlackRock’s purpose is to help more and more people experience financial well-being. As a fiduciary to investors and a leading provider of financial technology, we help millions of people build savings that serve them throughout their lives by making investing easier and more affordable. For additional information on BlackRock, please visit www.blackrock.com/corporate | Twitter: @BlackRockCA

    About iShares ETFs
    iShares unlocks opportunity across markets to meet the evolving needs of investors. With more than twenty years of experience, a global line-up of 1500+ exchange traded funds (ETFs) and US$4.3 trillion in assets under management as of March 31, 2025, iShares continues to drive progress for the financial industry. iShares funds are powered by the expert portfolio and risk management of BlackRock.

    iShares® ETFs are managed by BlackRock Asset Management Canada Limited.

    Commissions, trailing commissions, management fees and expenses all may be associated with investing in iShares ETFs. Please read the relevant prospectus before investing. The funds are not guaranteed, their values change frequently and past performance may not be repeated. Tax, investment and all other decisions should be made, as appropriate, only with guidance from a qualified professional.

    Standard & Poor’s® and S&P® are registered trademarks of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC (“S&P”). Dow Jones is a registered trademark of Dow Jones Trademark Holdings LLC (“Dow Jones”). TSX is a registered trademark of TSX Inc. (“TSX”). All of the foregoing trademarks have been licensed to S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC and sublicensed for certain purposes to BlackRock Fund Advisors (“BFA”), which in turn has sub-licensed these marks to its affiliate, BlackRock Asset Management Canada Limited (“BlackRock Canada”), on behalf of the applicable fund(s). The index is a product of S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC, and has been licensed for use by BFA and by extension, BlackRock Canada and the applicable fund(s). The funds are not sponsored, endorsed, sold or promoted by S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC, Dow Jones, S&P, any of their respective affiliates (collectively known as “S&P Dow Jones Indices”) or TSX, or any of their respective affiliates. Neither S&P Dow Jones Indices nor TSX make any representations regarding the advisability of investing in such funds.

    MSCI is a trademark of MSCI, Inc. (“MSCI”). The ETF is permitted to use the MSCI mark pursuant to a license agreement between MSCI and BlackRock Institutional Trust Company, N.A., relating to, among other things, the license granted to BlackRock Institutional Trust Company, N.A. to use the Index. BlackRock Institutional Trust Company, N.A. has sublicensed the use of this trademark to BlackRock. The ETF is not sponsored, endorsed, sold or promoted by MSCI and MSCI makes no representation, condition or warranty regarding the advisability of investing in the ETF. 

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: LCQ2: Work on attracting enterprises and investments

    Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region

    Following is a question by the Hon Jeffrey Lam and a reply by the Acting Secretary for Commerce and Economic Development, Dr Bernard Chan, in the Legislative Council today (May 14):

    Question:

    In recent years, the Government has been vigorously promoting the work on attracting enterprises and investments. It is learnt that Invest Hong Kong (InvestHK) assisted a total of 539 overseas and Mainland enterprises in setting up or expanding their businesses in Hong Kong last year. In this connection, will the Government inform this Council:

    (1) of the number of overseas and Mainland enterprises which InvestHK has assisted in establishing a presence in Hong Kong or setting up regional headquarters in Hong Kong since January this year; the home countries of such enterprises, as well as the industries to which they belong;

    (2) of the policies and measures currently put in place by the Government in respect of land, taxation, etc. to support overseas and Mainland enterprises in establishing a presence in Hong Kong; and

    (3) given that the Secretary for Labour and Welfare has pointed out at a special meeting of the Finance Committee of this Council held to discuss the Estimates of Expenditure 2025-2026 that Hong Kong Talent Engage (HKTE) would provide comprehensive one-stop support to incoming talents, of the total number of applications received by HKTE since January this year; among such applications, of the areas in which support has been provided?

    Reply:

    President,

    After consulting the Development Bureau (DEVB), the Financial Services and the Treasury Bureau, the Labour and Welfare Bureau, as well as the Office for Attracting Strategic Enterprises (OASES), my consolidated response to the Hon Jeffrey Lam’s question is as follows:

    InvestHK Hong Kong (InvestHK) is responsible for promoting inward direct investment to Hong Kong by attracting Mainland and overseas enterprises to set up or expand in the city. In 2024, InvestHK assisted 539 Mainland and overseas enterprises in establishing and expanding their businesses in Hong Kong, representing an increase of over 40 per cent year on year. On a pro-rata basis, the figure well exceeded the performance indicator as set out in the 2022 Policy Address by the Chief Executive. On the other hand, the number of companies in Hong Kong with overseas or Mainland parent companies in 2024 reached a record high of 9 960. It included 1 410 regional headquarters, an increase of over 5 per cent year on year.

    From January to April this year, InvestHK assisted 223 Mainland and overseas enterprises, representing an increase of 13 per cent as compared with the same period last year. These enterprises are expected to bring in direct investment of over $22.3 billion and create over 4 900 jobs within their first year of operations or expansion. Over one-fourth of these enterprises indicated their setup of international or regional headquarters in Hong Kong. The top five places of origin of those enterprises are the Mainland, the United States, Japan, the United Kingdom and Singapore; and the top five sectors are the financial services and fintech sector, family office, innovation and technology sector, tourism and hospitality sector, and consumer products sector.

    Separately, the current-term Government established OASES, which is directly under the Financial Secretary, to attract high-potential and representative strategic innovation and technology enterprises from around the globe. So far, OASES successfully attracted 84 strategic enterprises, many of which plan to establish their international or regional headquarters in Hong Kong.

    InvestHK and OASES provide Mainland and overseas enterprises with one-stop customised support services, including introducing tax regime and tax concessions of Hong Kong, assisting enterprises in identifying premises for operations, and assisting them in following up on matters relating to talent admission.

    In terms of tax policy, Hong Kong has been practicing a simple, territorial-based and low-tax regime. Hong Kong’s profits tax rates are very competitive internationally, with the first $2 million of profits of corporations taxed at the rate of 8.25 per cent, and the profits above that amount taxed at 16.5 per cent. Besides, tax types in Hong Kong are simple in that there is not any kind of capital gains tax, withholding tax on dividends or interest, estate duty, value-added tax, goods and services tax, nor digital services tax. The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR) has also been strategically utilising tax measures to facilitate the development of different industries. Tax concessions introduced over recent years have benefitted multiple industries or taxpayers, including the asset and wealth management industry, maritime industry, insurance industry, and taxpayers with intellectual property income.

    In terms of assisting enterprises in identifying suitable premises, given the diverse backgrounds of enterprises, InvestHK and OASES focus on understanding and catering to the different needs of individual enterprises. In respect of land supply, the DEVB has been collaborating with InvestHK and OASES to introduce to Mainland and overseas enterprises interested in setting up in Hong Kong the distribution of existing and future economic land in the territory, including how the Government will adopt an “industry-led” approach in planning strategic projects such as the Northern Metropolis (NM). In particular, as each New Development Area in the NM has its own industry positioning, the next few years will see considerable output in development land and floor space for innovation and technology and other emerging industries, as well as industries with traditional strengths, to move in. As for enterprises interested in setting up in Hong Kong and participating in the construction of buildings for industries, the DEVB will recommend development land for their consideration. It will also support relevant policy bureaux in exploring and adopting various modes of land disposal and land premium arrangements by giving consideration to restricted tender or direct land grant in addition to the traditional practice of open tender. When a project enters the design and construction stages, the DEVB will also provide one-stop services by co-ordinating with relevant departments to expedite approvals.

    Apart from focusing on attracting enterprises and investment, the current-term Government is also dedicated to attracting talents from overseas and the Mainland. Since its establishment on October 30, 2023, the Hong Kong Talent Engage (HKTE) strives to provide comprehensive one-stop support to talents. From January to April 2025, over 45 000 new applications under various talent admission schemes were received, of which over 35 000 applications were approved. The support services provided by the HKTE to incoming talents and their families include the following:

    (a) Themed seminars: To cater for the needs of incoming talents, leaders from various industries and admitted talents were invited to share career information and tips on starting a business. Since its establishment and up to end-April 2025, the HKTE has organised 33 online and offline themed seminars;

    (b) Job fairs: Job fairs help job-seeking talents to match with employers direct, so as to help incoming talents to look for jobs based on their skills, making better use of their professional competencies. As at end-April 2025, the HKTE has organised, co-organised and participated in 17 job fairs in total;

    (c) Enquiry and support matching services: The HKTE’s online platform currently connects with about 90 designated working partners to provide talents with advice and services in respect of job matching, accommodation, education, banking and insurance services, business and corporate services, integrated settlement services as well as networking and community through online matching services. The online platform has processed over 41 000 enquiries, mainly involving matters such as talent schemes, visa and job seeking, and made around 12 000 referrals of support service requests so far;

    (d) Integration activities: Participation in volunteer services allows incoming talents to strengthen their connections with the local community, thereby facilitating their better integration into local society. As at end-April 2025, the HKTE has organised, in collaboration with volunteer groups, three integration activities; and

    (e) Cantonese learning classes: The classes help enhance the Cantonese speaking and listening skills of incoming talents, and assist them in understanding the local culture and customs, thereby expediting their integration into local society. As at end-April 2025, the HKTE has organised 28 Cantonese learning classes.

    The HKSAR Government will continue to make every effort to attract more enterprises and talents from the Mainland and overseas.

    Ends/Wednesday, May 14, 2025
    Issued at HKT 12:21

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News

  • MIL-OSI: Valeura Energy Inc.: First Quarter 2025 Results

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    SINGAPORE, May 14, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Valeura Energy Inc. (TSX:VLE, OTCQX:VLERF) (“Valeura” or the “Company”) reports its unaudited financial and operating results for the three month period ended March 31, 2025.

    The complete quarterly reporting package for the Company, including the unaudited financial statements and associated management’s discussion and analysis (“MD&A”) are being filed on SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.ca and posted to the Company’s website at www.valeuraenergy.com.

    Highlights

    • Oil production of 23,853 bbls/d(1), an increase of 9% compared to Q1 last year;
    • Adjusted opex(2) trending downward, to US$24.1/bbl, a decrease of 8% compared to Q1 last year;
    • Adjusted Cashflow from Operations(2) of US$74.0 million, an increase of 55% compared to Q1 2024, demonstrating the effects of the corporate restructuring and application of tax loss carry-forwards;
    • The Company’s balance sheet remains very strong, with US$239 million cash(3) and no debt; and
    • Adjusted Working Capital(2) of US$254 million.

    (1)   Working interest share production before royalties.
    (2)   Non-IFRS financial measure or non-IFRS ratio – see “Non-IFRS Financial Measures and Ratios” section below.
    (3)   Includes restricted cash of US$23.4 million.

    Dr. Sean Guest, President and CEO commented:

    “We have demonstrated our ability to generate increasing cash flow. Q1 2025 was the first full quarter benefitting from our corporate re-organisation, which makes it possible to optimise the use of tax loss carry-forwards. As a result, our post-tax Adjusted Cashflow from Operations(1)increased to US$74 million, up 55% compared to the same quarter of last year, on revenue that is essentially unchanged. This creates a uniquely resilient position for our Company, which makes it possible for us to weather volatile markets better than many of our competitors.

    Underlying this is a respectable operational performance which saw us produce at an average rate of 23,854 bbls/d, while recording Adjusted Opex per barrel(1)of US$24/bbl. The long-term downward trend in Adjusted Opex per barrel(1)is a direct reflection of our strategic priorities in action – operating our assets in a worldclass manner with the objective of driving deeper efficiency and maximising cash flow and growth from our assets.

    Our balance sheet echoes this sentiment too. Even after a quarter with a US$39 million out-of-round tax payment and a build in oil inventory, our financial position remained strong, with a March 31stcash balance of US$239 million and no debt. As a result, we are in a prime position to pursue both organic and inorganic growth ambitions and continue to see exiting opportunities come to the foreground.”

    (1)   Non-IFRS financial measure or non-IFRS ratio – see “Non-IFRS Financial Measures and Ratios” section below.

    Financial and Operating Results Summary

        Three months ended
    Mar 31, 2025
      Three months ended
    Dec 31, 2024
    Delta (%)   Three months ended
    Mar 31, 2024
    Delta (%)
    Oil Production(1) (‘000 bbls) 2,147   2,402 -11 %   1,991 8 %
    Average Daily Oil Production(1) (bbls/d) 23,853   26,109 -9 %   21,882 9 %
    Average Realised Price (US$/bbl) 78.7   76.7 3 %   84.6 -7 %
    Oil Volumes Sold (‘000 bbls) 1,881   2,948 -36 %   1,765 7 %
    Oil Revenue (US$’000) 148,081   226,148 -35 %   149,408 -1 %
    Net Income (US$’000) 14,073   213,983 -93 %   19,418 -28 %
    Adjusted EBITDAX(2) (US$’000) 87,216   132,402 -34 %   88,721 -2 %
    Adjusted Pre-Tax Cashflow from Operations(2) (US$’000) 74,384   133,612 -44 %   72,088 3 %
    Adjusted Cashflow from Operations(2) (US$’000) 73,954   107,134 -31 %   47,855 55 %
    Operating Expenses (US$’000) 38,852   55,607 -30 %   41,788 -7 %
    Adjusted Opex(2) (US$’000) 51,684   54,668 -5 %   52,264 -1 %
    Operating Expenses per bbl (US$/bbl) 18.1   23.2 -22 %   21 -14 %
    Adjusted Opex per bbl(2) (US$/bbl) 24.1   22.8 6 %   26.2 -8 %
    Adjusted Capex(2) (US$’000) 32,899   38,870 -15 %   29,257 12 %
    Weighted average shares outstanding – basic (‘000 shares) 106,532   106,955 0 %   103,229 3 %
                     
        As at
    Mar 31, 2025
      As at
    Dec 31, 2024
    Delta (%)   As at
    Mar 31, 2024
    Delta (%)
    Cash & Cash equivalents(3) (US$’000) 238,871   259,354 -8 %   193,683 23 %
    Adjusted Net Working Capital(2) (US$’000) 253,511   205,735 23 %   141,877 79 %
    Shareholder’s Equity (US$’000) 538,137   528,283 2 %   304,318 77 %
                         

    (1)   Working interest share production before royalties.
    (2)   Non-IFRS financial measure or non-IFRS ratio – see “Non-IFRS Financial Measures and Ratios” section below.
    (3)   Includes restricted cash of US$23.4 million.

    Financial Update

    The Company’s Q1 2025 financial performance reflects ongoing strong production operations at all four of its fields in the offshore Gulf of Thailand. Valeura’s working interest share production before royalties totalled 2.15 million bbls during Q1 2025, an increase of 8% from Q1 2024. Production was in line with the Company’s expectations considering the Nong Yao field experienced a planned maintenance shutdown.

    Oil sales totalled 1.88 million bbls during Q1 2025, which was less than the volume produced, and therefore contributed to an oil inventory increase to 0.89 million bbls at March 31, 2025. As all of the Company’s oil production is stored in floating offshore vessels before being sold in parcels of approximately 200,000 – 300,000 bbls, at any given time, the Company maintains some quantity of oil held in inventory.

    Price realisations averaged US$78.7/bbl, which was 7% lower than the same period in 2024, reflecting lower global benchmark oil prices. The Company’s oil sales continue to achieve a premium when compared to the Brent crude oil benchmark, averaging US$2.9/bbl in Q1 2025, versus US$1.6/bbl in Q1 of 2024. Valeura generated oil revenue of US$148 million in Q1 2025, essentially unchanged from the oil revenue generated Q1 2024, reflecting the increase in production being offset by reduced sales prices.

    Operating expenses during Q1 2025 reflect a long-term trend of improving production efficiency, influenced by ongoing strong performance of the Nong Yao field, which is both the Company’s largest source of production and also the lowest unit cost field in Valeura’s portfolio. Along with operating expenses, the Company includes the price of leases for its floating offshore infrastructure (being US$8.5 million) to derive an Adjusted Opex(1) of US$51.7 million in Q1 2025, which equates to a per-unit rate of US$24.1/bbl, an improvement of 8% when compared to Q1 2024.

    Valeura generated adjusted cashflow from operations(1) (pre-tax) of US$74.0 million, which was a 55% increase over Q1 2024. The increase is directly related to the more tax-efficient corporate structure as a result of the Company’s corporate re-organisation, which was completed in November 2024. Under the new structure, Valeura may apply its tax loss carry-forwards to taxable income for the Nong Yao, Manora, and Wassana fields.

    While cash tax payments are normally paid in May and August each year, the Company made a final tax payment of US$39.2 million in connection with its corporate restructuring. This payment effectively completed the tax obligations for its Thai III licences under their previous organisation structure, giving rise to the more optimised application of tax loss carry-forwards as noted above. In addition to this out-of-round payment, Valeura made cash outlays in respect of its operating costs and capex of US$32.9 million. As a result, Valeura’s cash position at March 31, 2025 was US$238.9 million, inclusive of restricted cash of US$23.4 million. Valeura’s net working capital surplus was US$253.5 million at March 31, 2025.

    (1)   Non-IFRS financial measure or non-IFRS ratio – see “Non-IFRS Financial Measures and Ratios” section below.

    Operations Update and Outlook

    During Q1 2025, Valeura had ongoing production operations at all of its Gulf of Thailand fields, including Jasmine, Manora, Nong Yao, and Wassana fields. Total working interest share production before royalties averaged 23,853 bbls/d, which was in line with management’s expectations and consistent with achieving the Company’s guidance range for the full year 2025 of 23,000 – 25,500 bbls/d. One drilling rig was under contract throughout the quarter.

    Jasmine/Ban Yen

    Oil production before royalties from the Jasmine/Ban Yen field, in Licence B5/27 (100% operated interest) averaged 8,356 bbls/d during Q1 2025.

    In February 2025, the Company’s contracted drilling rig began a seven-well infill drilling campaign which includes both development and appraisal targets on the Jasmine C, Jasmine D, and Ban Yen A facilities. Drilling operations are progressing safely and on time. The drilling programme is expected to be complete approximately by the end of May 2025.

    Also during Q1 2025, a low-BTU gas generator was delivered to the Jasmine B platform. Installation and commissioning activities in respect of the low-BTU gas generator are underway, with the new equipment planned to be fully operational and online later in Q2 2025. The low-BTU gas generator is a modernisation of the Jasmine B platform’s power generation facility, which will enable a waste gas stream to be used as feedstock for power generation, thereby reducing the Jasmine field’s reliance on diesel. As a result, Valeura anticipates immediate savings in operating expenses and a long-term reduction in its greenhouse gas emissions from the Jasmine field.

    Nong Yao

    At the Nong Yao field, in Licence G11/48 (90% operated working interest), Valeura’s working interest share production before royalties averaged 9,275 bbls/d. As a result of the Company’s development of the Nong Yao C field extension in 2024, Nong Yao has become the Company’s largest source of production, with the Company’s lowest per unit Adjusted Opex.

    Near the end of Q1 2025, Valeura conducted a planned seven-day annual maintenance shutdown of the Nong Yao field. All maintenance work was performed safely, under budget, and ahead of schedule. The Nong Yao field has since resumed normal operations.

    Wassana

    Oil production before royalties from the Wassana field, in Licence G10/48 (100% operated interest), averaged 3,686 bbls/d during Q1 2025. Production operations progressed without incident throughout the quarter. No wells were drilled during the quarter.

    During Q1 2025 Valeura completed the front end engineering and design work for the potential redevelopment of the Wasssana field and more recently has finalised detailed contracting and procurement work to validate cost assumptions for the project.

    As announced separately today, the Company has determined a positive final investment decision and intends to pursue the Wassana field redevelopment project, targeting the start of production from a newly built facility in Q2 2027.

    Manora

    At the Manora field, in Licence G1/48 (70% operated working interest), Valeura’s working interest share of oil production before royalties averaged 2,536 bbls/d.

    During Q1 2025, Valeura completed a five-well infill drilling campaign on the Manora field, comprised of both development and appraisal targets. The drilling programme achieved its objectives and successful appraisal results have identified between three and five potential future drilling targets, which are now being evaluated for inclusion in a future drilling programme.

    Türkiye

    The Company had no active operations in Türkiye during Q1 2025. Valeura continues to hold an interest in a potentially large deep gas play in the Thrace basin in the northwest part of the country. The terms of the subject leases and licences have been extended to June 27, 2026, with further extensions possible for appraisal purposes thereafter.

    Valeura intends to farm out a portion of its interest to a new partner in order to jointly pursue the next phase of appraisal work. The Company continues to see the Thrace basin deep gas play as a source of significant potential value in the longer-term.

    Webcast

    Valeura’s Annual General Meeting of Shareholders is scheduled for today, May 14, 2025, at 4:00 P.M. (Calgary time) in Calgary. Shareholders may attend in person, as further detailed in the Management’s Information Circular which was mailed to shareholders and is available on the Company’s website and on www.sedarplus.ca. A webcast of the live event is available with the link below. In addition to the meeting, Valeura’s management will discuss the Q1 2025 results and will host a question and answer session. Written questions may be submitted through the webcast system or by email to IR@valeuraenergy.com.

    Participants are advised to register for the online event in advance, using the following link: https://events.teams.microsoft.com/event/f0e30b40-c6bc-4673-bd84-b57491e1ba58@a196a1a0-4579-4a0c-b3a3-855f4db8f64b

    An audio only feed of the Meeting is available by phone using the Conference ID and dial-in numbers below:

    Conference ID: 239 311 896 799

    Dial-in numbers:

    Canada: (833) 845-9589,,49176158#
    Singapore: +65 6450 6302,,49176158#
    Thailand: +66 2 026 9035,,49176158#
    Türkiye: 0800 142 034779,,49176158#
    United Kingdom: 0800 640 3933,,49176158#
    United States: (833) 846-5630,,49176158#

    For further information, please contact:

    Valeura Energy Inc. (General Corporate Enquiries)
    Sean Guest, President and CEO
    Yacine Ben-Meriem, CFO
    Contact@valeuraenergy.com
    +65 6373 6940
       
    Valeura Energy Inc. (Investor and Media Enquiries)
    Robin James Martin, Vice President, Communications and Investor Relations
    IR@valeuraenergy.com
    +1 403 975 6752 / +44 7392 940495
       

    Contact details for the Company’s advisors, covering research analysts and joint brokers, including Auctus Advisors LLP, Canaccord Genuity Ltd (UK), Cormark Securities Inc., Research Capital Corporation, and Stifel Nicolaus Europe Limited, are listed on the Company’s website at www.valeuraenergy.com/investor-information/analysts/.

    About the Company

    Valeura Energy Inc. is a Canadian public company engaged in the exploration, development and production of petroleum and natural gas in Thailand and in Türkiye. The Company is pursuing a growth-oriented strategy and intends to re-invest into its producing asset portfolio and to deploy resources toward further organic and inorganic growth in Southeast Asia. Valeura aspires toward value accretive growth for stakeholders while adhering to high standards of environmental, social and governance responsibility.

    Additional information relating to Valeura is also available on SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.ca.

    Non-IFRS Financial Measures and Ratios

    This news release includes references to financial measures commonly used in the oil and gas industry such as adjusted EBITDAX, net working capital, adjusted net working capital, adjusted cashflow from operations, adjusted opex, adjusted capex, net cash and outstanding debt which are not generally accepted accounting measures under International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS Accounting Standards”) which are not generally accepted accounting measures under IFRS Accounting Standards as issued by International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”) and do not have any standardised meaning prescribed by IFRS Accounting Standards and, therefore, may not be comparable with similar definitions that may be used by other public companies. Management believes that adjusted EBITDAX, net working capital, adjusted net working capital, adjusted cashflow from operations, adjusted opex, adjusted capex, net cash and outstanding debt are useful supplemental measures that may assist shareholders and investors in assessing the financial performance and position of the Company. Non-IFRS financial measures should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures prepared in accordance with IFRS Accounting Standards.

    Adjusted EBITDAX: is a non-IFRS financial measure which does not have a standardised meaning prescribed by IFRS Accounting Standards. This non-IFRS financial measure is included because management uses the information to analyse the financial performance of the Company. Adjusted EBITDAX is a non-IFRS and non-standardised variant of EBITDAX, adjusted to remove non-cash items as well as certain non-recurring costs including severance payments and other one-off items in relation to the Company’s recent acquisitions. Adjusted EBITDAX is calculated by adjusting profit for the year before other items as reported under IFRS Accounting Standards to exclude the effects of other income, exploration, SRB, finance income and expense, depletion, depreciation & amortisation (“DD&A”), other costs, and certain non-cash items (such as impairments, foreign exchange, unrealised risk management contracts, reassessment of contingent consideration and gains or losses arising from the disposal of capital assets). In addition, other unusual or non-recurring items are excluded from Adjusted EBITDAX, as they are not indicative of the underlying financial performance of the Company.

           
        Three months ended  
        Unaudited Unaudited  
        March 31, March 31,  
    US$’000   2025   2024    
    Profit for the period before other items   37,614   27,104    
    Other income   (2,342 ) (1,737 )  
    Exploration   275   2,196    
    SRB   23      
    Finance costs   4,990   6,516    
    DD&A   45,462   47,596    
    Reversal of loss on inventory due to decline in resale value associate with the Wassana field(1)     6,157    
    Other non-recurring G&A costs (1)(2)   1,194   889    
    Adjusted EBITDAX   87,216   88,721    
                 

    (1)     Items are not shown in the Interim Financial Statements.
    (2)    Represents non-recurring costs associated with share-based compensation, actual severance incurred – See “General and Administrative (“G&A”) Expenses” for more details.

    Adjusted opex and adjusted opex per bbl: are a non-IFRS financial measure and a non-IFRS financial ratio, respectively, which do not have standardised meanings prescribed by IFRS Accounting Standards. This non-IFRS financial measure and ratio are included because management uses the information to analyse cash generation and financial performance of the Company. Operating cost represents the operating cash expenses incurred by the Company during the period including the leases that are associated with operations, such as bareboat contracts for key operating equipment, such as FSOs, FPSOs, MOPU, and warehouses. Adjusted opex is calculated by effectively adjusting non-cash items from the operating cost and adding lease costs.

    Adjusted opex is divided by production in the period to arrive at adjusted opex per bbl. Valeura calculates adjusted opex per barrel, to provide a more consistent indication of the cost of field operations. Adjusted opex, as opposed to operating expenses, excludes the impacts of non-recurring, non-cash items such as prior period adjustments, and adds back lease costs in relation to FSOs, FPSOs, MOPU, and other facilities.

           
        Three months ended  
        Unaudited Unaudited  
        March 31, March 31,  
    US$’000   2025 2024    
    Operating Costs   38,852 41,788    
    Reversal of inventory write-down to Net Realisable Value (Wassana field)(1)   7,126    
    Cost of Goods Sold   38,852 48,914    
    Reversal of accounting related to inventory capitalisation(2) 4,326 (5,245 )  
    Adjusted Opex (excluding Leases)   43,178 43,669    
    Leases(3)   8,506 8,595    
    Adjusted Opex   51,684 52,264    
    Production Volumes during the period (mbbls)   2,147 1,991    
    Adjusted Opex per Barrel (US$/bbl)   24.1 26.2    
               

    (1)    Represent write down inventory to net realisable value.
    (2)   The item is not shown in the Interim Financial Statements. The cost of crude inventory is capitalised from operating costs. As a result, the Company has excluded the effect of crude inventory capitalization.
    (3)   In accordance with IFRS 16 – Leases, the Company recognised cost related to its operating leases – attributed to FSO and FPSO vessels, MOPU used at its Jasmine/Ban Yen, Nong Yao, Manora and Wassana fields, as well as onshore warehouse facilities costs to its balance sheet and finance cost in the profit and loss statement. In order to report a more relevant lifting cost, the Company has included costs associated with these leases in the adjusted operating cost calculation. This will be a recurring adjustment.

    Adjusted cashflow from operations and adjusted cashflow from operations per barrel: are a non-IFRS financial measure and a non-IFRS financial ratio, respectively, which do not have a standardised meaning prescribed by IFRS Accounting Standards. This non-IFRS finance measure and ratio are included because management uses the information to analyse cash generation and financial performance of the Company. Adjusted cashflow from operations is calculated using two methods which generate the same figures: a) by subtracting from oil revenues, adjusted opex, royalties, general and administrative costs which are adjusted for non-recurring charges (generating the adjusted pre-tax cashflow), and accrued PITA taxes and SRB expenses, and b) to enhance and facilitate to the reader a reconciliation of this non-IFRS measure, the Company also presented the adjusted cash flow from operations by calculating from cash generated from (used in) operating activities in the consolidated statement of cash flows, adjusting with non-cash items, adjusted opex, general and administrative costs which are adjusted for non-recurring charges (generating the adjusted pre-tax cashflow), and accrued PITA tax and SRB expenses.

    Adjusted cashflow from operations is divided by production in the period to arrive at adjusted cashflow from operations per bbl. Valeura calculates Adjusted cashflow from operations per barrel, to provide a more consistent indication of cashflow generated from operations by the Company.

           
        Three months ended  
        Unaudited Unaudited  
        March 31, March 31,  
    US$’000    2025   2024    
    Oil revenues   148,081   149,408    
    Adjusted opex   (51,684 ) (52,264 )  
    Royalties   (17,062 ) (18,639 )  
    Recurring G&A costs   (4,951 ) (6,417 )  
    Adjusted pre-tax cashflow from operations   74,384   72,088    
    Income tax / PITA tax   (407 ) (24,233 )  
    SRB   (23 )    
    Adjusted cashflow from operations   73,954   47,855    
    Production during the period   2,147   1,991    
    Adjusted cashflow from operations per barrel (US$/bbl)   34.4   24.0    
           
        Three months ended  
        Unaudited Unaudited  
        March 31, March 31,  
    US$’000    2025   2024    
    Cash generated from operating activities   27,175   81,143    
    Change in non-cash working capital   48,330   (6,033 )  
    Non-cash items   55,514   55,659    
    Adjusted opex   (51,684 ) (52,264 )  
    Recurring G&A costs   (4,951 ) (6,417 )  
    Adjusted pre-tax cashflow from operations   74,384   72,088    
    Income tax / PITA tax   (407 ) (24,233 )  
    SRB   (23 )    
    Adjusted cashflow from operations   73,954   47,855    
    Production during the period   2,147   1,991    
    Adjusted cashflow from operations per barrel (US$/bbl)   34.4   24.0    
                 

    Outstanding debt and net cash: are non-IFRS financial measures which do not have a standardised meaning prescribed by IFRS Accounting Standards. These non-IRFS financial measures are provided because management uses the information to a) analyse financial strength and b) manage the capital structure of the Company. These non-IFRS measures are used to ensure capital is managed effectively in order to support the Company’s ongoing operations and needs.

           
        Unaudited  
        March 31, December 31,
    US$’000    2025 2024
    Outstanding Debt  
    Cash and cash equivalents   215,467 236,543
    Restricted cash (Current)   1,093 1,093
    Restricted cash (Non-current)   22,311 21,718
    Cash balance   238,871 259,354
    Net cash   238,871 259,354
           

    Net working capital and adjusted net working capital: are non-IFRS financial measures which do not have a standardised meaning prescribed by IFRS Accounting Standards. These non-IFRS financial measures are included because management uses the information to analyse liquidity and financial strength of the Company. Net working capital is calculated by deducting current liabilities from current assets. Adjusted net working capital is calculated by adding back the current leases liabilities and including non-current restricted cash in net working capital.

    The leases are associated with operations, such as bareboat contracts for key operating equipment, such as FSOs, FPSOs, MOPU, and warehouses which are included in the Company’s disclosed adjusted opex (and adjusted opex guidance). Management believes the adjusted net working capital provides a useful data point to the reader to ascertain the business’ next-twelve-months surplus or deficit capital requirement. It is also a data point that management uses for cash management.

           
        Unaudited  
        March 31, December 31,
    US$’000   2025   2024  
    Current assets   343,948   340,911  
    Current liabilities   (142,673 ) (185,640 )
    Net working capital   201,275   155,271  
    Current lease liabilities   29,925   28,746  
    Restricted cash (Non-current)   22,311   21,718  
    Adjusted net working capital   253,511   205,735  
               

    Adjusted capex: is a non-IFRS measure which does not have a standardised meaning prescribed by IFRS Accounting Standards. Adjusted capex is defined as the addition in capital expenditure for drilling, brownfield, and other PP&E. Management uses this non-IFRS measure to analyse the capital spending of the Company and assess investments in its assets.

           
        Three months ended  
        Unaudited Unaudited  
        March 31, March 31,  
    US$’000   2025   2024    
    Drilling   26,624   27,612    
    Brownfield   6,423   3,145    
    Other PPE   (148 ) (1,500 )  
    Adjusted capex(1)   32,899   29,257    
                 

    Advisory and Caution Regarding Forward-Looking Information

    Certain information included in this news release constitutes forward-looking information under applicable securities legislation. Such forward-looking information is for the purpose of explaining management’s current expectations and plans relating to the future. Readers are cautioned that reliance on such information may not be appropriate for other purposes, such as making investment decisions. Forward-looking information typically contains statements with words such as “anticipate”, “believe”, “expect”, “plan”, “intend”, “estimate”, “propose”, “project”, “target” or similar words suggesting future outcomes or statements regarding an outlook.

    Forward-looking information in this news release includes, but is not limited to, the ability to optimise use of tax loss carry-forwards; the Company’s ability to weather volatile markets better than many of its competitors; the Company being in a prime position to pursue its growth ambitions; the Company’s expectations about meeting it’s guidance range for the full year 2025; timing to complete the Jasmine field drilling programme; timing for the Jasmine low-BTU gas generator to be fully operational and online and the potential for savings in operating expenses and reduced greenhouse gas emissions thereafter; timing for the Wassana redevelopment project and start of production from a newly built facility; expectations for future drilling on the Manora field; and the potential for further extensions of the Thrace basin leases and licences.

    Although the Company believes the expectations and assumptions reflected in such forward-looking information are reasonable, they may prove to be incorrect.

    Forward-looking information is based on management’s current expectations and assumptions regarding, among other things: political stability of the areas in which the Company is operating; continued safety of operations and ability to proceed in a timely manner; continued operations of and approvals forthcoming from governments and regulators in a manner consistent with past conduct; ability to achieve extensions to licences in Thailand and Türkiye to support attractive development and resource recovery; future drilling activity on the required/expected timelines; the prospectivity of the Company’s lands; the continued favourable pricing and operating netbacks across its business; future production rates and associated operating netbacks and cash flow; decline rates; future sources of funding; future economic conditions; the impact of inflation of future costs; future currency exchange rates; interest rates; the ability to meet drilling deadlines and fulfil commitments under licences and leases; future commodity prices; the impact of the Russian invasion of Ukraine; the impact of conflicts in the Middle East; royalty rates and taxes; management’s estimate of cumulative tax losses being correct; future capital and other expenditures; the success obtained in drilling new wells and working over existing wellbores; the performance of wells and facilities; the availability of the required capital to funds its exploration, development and other operations, and the ability of the Company to meet its commitments and financial obligations; the ability of the Company to secure adequate processing, transportation, fractionation and storage capacity on acceptable terms; the capacity and reliability of facilities; the application of regulatory requirements respecting abandonment and reclamation; the recoverability of the Company’s reserves and contingent resources; future growth; the sufficiency of budgeted capital expenditures in carrying out planned activities; the impact of increasing competition; the availability and identification of mergers and acquisition opportunities; the ability to successfully negotiate and complete any mergers and acquisition opportunities; the ability to efficiently integrate assets and employees acquired through acquisitions; global energy policies going forward; international trade policies; future debt levels; and the Company’s continued ability to obtain and retain qualified staff and equipment in a timely and cost efficient manner. In addition, the Company’s work programmes and budgets are in part based upon expected agreement among joint venture partners and associated exploration, development and marketing plans and anticipated costs and sales prices, which are subject to change based on, among other things, the actual results of drilling and related activity, availability of drilling, offshore storage and offloading facilities and other specialised oilfield equipment and service providers, changes in partners’ plans and unexpected delays and changes in market conditions. Although the Company believes the expectations and assumptions reflected in such forward-looking information are reasonable, they may prove to be incorrect.

    Forward-looking information involves significant known and unknown risks and uncertainties. Exploration, appraisal, and development of oil and natural gas reserves and resources are speculative activities and involve a degree of risk. A number of factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated by the Company including, but not limited to: the ability of management to execute its business plan or realise anticipated benefits from acquisitions; the risk of disruptions from public health emergencies and/or pandemics; competition for specialised equipment and human resources; the Company’s ability to manage growth; the Company’s ability to manage the costs related to inflation; disruption in supply chains; the risk of currency fluctuations; changes in interest rates, oil and gas prices and netbacks; the risk that the Company’s tax advisors’ and/or auditors’ assessment of the Company’s cumulative tax losses varies significantly from management’s expectations of the same; potential changes in joint venture partner strategies and participation in work programmes; uncertainty regarding the contemplated timelines and costs for work programme execution; the risks of disruption to operations and access to worksites; potential changes in laws and regulations, including international treaties and trade policies; the uncertainty regarding government and other approvals; counterparty risk; the risk that financing may not be available; risks associated with weather delays and natural disasters; and the risk associated with international activity. See the most recent annual information form and management’s discussion and analysis of the Company for a detailed discussion of the risk factors.

    Certain forward-looking information in this news release may also constitute “financial outlook” within the meaning of applicable securities legislation. Financial outlook involves statements about Valeura’s prospective financial performance or position and is based on and subject to the assumptions and risk factors described above in respect of forward-looking information generally as well as any other specific assumptions and risk factors in relation to such financial outlook noted in this news release. Such assumptions are based on management’s assessment of the relevant information currently available, and any financial outlook included in this news release is made as of the date hereof and provided for the purpose of helping readers understand Valeura’s current expectations and plans for the future. Readers are cautioned that reliance on any financial outlook may not be appropriate for other purposes or in other circumstances and that the risk factors described above or other factors may cause actual results to differ materially from any financial outlook.

    The forward-looking information contained in this news release is made as of the date hereof and the Company undertakes no obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking information, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, unless required by applicable securities laws. The forward-looking information contained in this news release is expressly qualified by this cautionary statement.

    This news release does not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy securities in any jurisdiction, including where such offer would be unlawful. This news release is not for distribution or release, directly or indirectly, in or into the United States, Ireland, the Republic of South Africa or Japan or any other jurisdiction in which its publication or distribution would be unlawful.

    Neither the Toronto Stock Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the Toronto Stock Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this news release.

    This information is provided by Reach, the non-regulatory press release distribution service of RNS, part of the London Stock Exchange. Terms and conditions relating to the use and distribution of this information may apply. For further information, please contact rns@lseg.com or visit www.rns.com.

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Leader announces new Cabinet for 2025/26

    Source: City of Oxford

    Published: Wednesday, 14 May 2025

    Councillor Susan Brown, Leader of Oxford City Council, has announced her Cabinet for 2025/26.

    Councillor Louise Upton is not on the Cabinet in 2025/26 because she will be serving as the Lord Mayor of Oxford.

    The Cabinet has subsequently been reduced from nine members to eight.

    The Cabinet Members are:

    • Councillor Susan Brown, Leader, and Cabinet Member for Partnership Working and Inclusive Economic Growth
    • Councillor Ed Turner, Deputy Leader (Statutory), and Cabinet Member for Finance and Asset Management
    • Councillor Anna Railton, Deputy Leader, and Cabinet Member for a Zero Carbon Oxford
    • Councillor Lubna Arshad, Cabinet Member for a Safer Oxford
    • Councillor Nigel Chapman, Cabinet Member for Citizen Focused Services and Council Companies
    • Councillor Alex Hollingsworth, Cabinet member for Planning and Culture
    • Councillor Chewe Munkonge, Cabinet Member for a Healthy, Fairer Oxford and Small Business Champion
    • Councillor Linda Smith, Cabinet Member for Housing and Communities

    The responsibilities of each Cabinet Member are:

    • Councillor Susan Brown
      • Council strategy and policy delivery
      • Democratic Services and Member Support
      • Partnerships and outside bodies including
      • District Councils Network (Labour Vice Chair)
      • Fast Growth Cities (Chair)
      • Local Government General Assembly member
      • Oxford Growth Commission
      • Oxford Strategic Partnership
    • Councillor Ed Turner
      • Deputise for Leader as required
      • Financial and treasury strategy
      • Financial support for local residents and businesses
      • Links with our twin cities
      • Property and asset management and maintenance
    • Councillor Anna Railton
      • Deputise for Leader as required
      • Air Quality
      • Biodiversity delivery including verge and tree planting
      • Carbon reduction, heat decarbonisation and retrofitting
      • Delivery of Zero Carbon Oxford City Council by 2030
      • Delivery of the outcomes of the Oxford Citizens Assembly on Climate Change
      • Parks, Allotments, Cemeteries and Open Spaces
      • Renewable energy and energy planning
      • Sustainability
      • Taxi Licensing
      • Transport liaison with Oxfordshire County Council and Highways England and other providers
    • Councillor Lubna Arshad
      • Community safety and tackling antisocial behaviour
      • Safeguarding Adults and Children
      • Working with Thames Valley Police to tackle anti-social behaviour, child sexual exploitation, county lines, drug dealing, domestic abuse, knife crime, modern slavery, violence against women and girls and crime generally
    • Councillor Nigel Chapman
      • Business Improvement
      • Customer Service
      • Oxford Direct Services as contractor
      • OX Place as a company
      • Service delivery
      • Street scene, public conveniences
      • Tree management
      • Waste and recycling
    • Councillor Alex Hollingsworth
      • Car Parking Policy
      • City Centre Action Plan delivery
      • Culture, cultural partnerships and events (including St Giles Fair, Cowley Road Carnival etc.)
      • Development and Building Control
      • Infrastructure planning
      • Licensing Policy
      • Local Plan and planning policies including biodiversity
      • Spatial Planning and conservation
      • Major projects delivery
      • Museum of Oxford
      • Promotion of a thriving music and night-time economy
      • Tourism
    • Councillor Chewe Munkonge
      • Addressing health inequalities and public health promotion
      • Children and young people policies and school liaison
      • Leisure partnership and contract management
      • Local market promotions
      • Promotion of Oxford Living Wage
      • Small Business Champion
      • Sport and physical activity
    • Councillor Linda Smith
      • Affordable housing delivery
      • Community centres, pavilions and grants
      • Estate regeneration projects
      • Homelessness services including prevention
      • Housing allocations and strategy
      • Regulation of the Private Rented Sector
      • Tenancy management and sustainment
      • Tenant and Resident involvement

    The new Cabinet will be announced at the Annual Council Meeting tomorrow (15 May).

    “The Cabinet will continue our work focused on our key priorities: tackling inequality and the high cost of living in Oxford, delivering more affordable homes, making Oxford a great place to live and preparing our city for climate change. In order to achieve this, we will continue to provide stable and prudent council finances and good quality services.

    “We want to make sure that Oxford’s strong and growing economy is delivering for all of Oxford’s citizens. As a cabinet we are committed to continuing to work with Oxford’s diverse communities and businesses to support their needs. Oxford is a great place to live, work and do business and we want everyone to feel proud of their neighbourhood. That is what we are striving to achieve.”

    Councillor Susan Brown, Leader of Oxford City Council

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI: Valeura Energy Inc.: Final Investment Decision on Wassana Field Redevelopment

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    SINGAPORE, May 14, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Valeura Energy Inc. (TSX:VLE, OTCQX:VLERF) (“Valeura” or the “Company”) has taken final investment decision (“FID”) on redevelopment of the Wassana field, in Licence G10/48 (100% Valeura interest), offshore Gulf of Thailand, which is expected to create significant value for shareholders. The Company is pleased to provide details of the redevelopment project, updated reserves and resources estimates and values, and a revision to its 2025 guidance.

    Highlights

    • Optimum Redevelopment Design: Redevelopment of the Wassana field through a new-build central processing platform (“CPP”) to optimise full block potential;
    • Production Growth: First oil expected in Q2 2027, with peak field production of 10,000 bbls/d – more than 2.7 times current output from the field;
    • Significant Reserves Increase: Wassana proved plus probable (2P) reserves increased to 20.5 million bbls, representing an increment of approximately 18 million bbls compared to the continuing production with existing infrastructure only(1);
    • Field Life Extension: Extends the end-of-field life (“EOFL”) to 2043, an increase of 16 years;
    • Efficient and Fully Funded Capital Allocation: US$120 million estimated investment in facilities over the next two years, with US$40 million in 2025, and the remainder in 2026, fully funded from the Company’s balance sheet;
    • Highly accretive: Wassana 2P net present value (NPV10) before tax increases to US$218 million (vs. US$127 million pre-FID)(2), equating to a net asset value (“NAV”)(3) addition of C$1.23 per share; and
    • Strong and Resilient Economics: An estimated 40% internal rate of return (“IRR”) at US$60/bbl Brent oil prices, and upside at higher price points, with a payback of 18 months.

    (1)   Management estimate of reserves recoverable in a no-further-action case, with assumed decommissioning of the Mobile Offshore Production Unit (“MOPU”) at the end of 2027.
    (2)   NSAI 2024 Report, as more fully described in the Company’s February 13, 2025 press release.
    (3)   Incremental 2P NPV10after tax, using US$/C$ exchange rate of 1.435, and 106.65 million common shares outstanding, as at December 31, 2024.

    Dr. Sean Guest, President and CEO commented:

    “Our final investment decision to pursue the Wassana redevelopment project is a milestone for Valeura. Since assuming operatorship, we have identified substantially more reserves than were initially estimated at the Wassana field. Beyond the significant increase in reserves and extension of field life, this project is expected to significantly increase production from the field to 10,000 bbls/d in the second half of 2027, at anticipated unit Adjusted Opex reflecting a reduction of approximately 2/3rdsversus current rates.

    Additionally, this development concept is creating opportunities for further growth through a ‘hub and spoke’ model whereby we can potentially tie-in the satellite oil accumulations already discovered both north and south of the main Wassana field. This approach has been highly successful in both our Jasmine and Nong Yao fields.

    This project is very robust and resilient from an economic standpoint. Even in a lower oil price environment of US$60 per barrel, the development delivers returns of approximately 40% IRR. This economic strength provides downside protection while maintaining upside potential as oil prices strengthen, creating a favourable risk-reward profile for our shareholders.

    Our financial position allows us to fully fund this development through existing cash reserves, without compromising our balance sheet strength. The project’s solid economics across various price scenarios demonstrates our disciplined approach to capital allocation and our commitment to creating sustainable value for our shareholders.

    I am very pleased that Valeura has grown into a business that has the capacity to take on this magnitude of project. At the same time, we continue to uphold our principle of generating healthy cash flow which provides the financial wherewithal to continue our ambition to add further value through growth.”

    Wassana Field Redevelopment

    Current production from the Wassana field is via a MOPU facility that is constrained by an end-of-life expected at end 2027. Given this limited life, it is only possible to recover approximately 2.5 mmbbls of oil with the current production facility. The facility is also limited in the number of future development wells that could be drilled and has insufficient oil and fluid processing capacity to recover the expected reserves and resources of oil in the G10/48 licence. Further, the MOPU’s age and processing system also carry the highest unit Adjusted Opex of all Valeura’s Gulf of Thailand assets.

    The Company has reviewed a number of different redevelopment concepts for the Wassana field and has selected a new CPP with 24 production well slots as the optimal development concept to yield both the highest financial returns and the maximum total recoverable oil from the G10/48 licence. The new CPP will replace the existing MOPU production infrastructure and is expected to allow for a more holistic commercialisation of the field’s oil reserves, both by enabling more aerially extensive drilling reach and also by way of a longer facility design life, resulting in more years of cash flow generation. Given the increased reserves and contingent resource identified in the G10/48 licence, the new facility is required to have a production life well into the 2040s. The CPP, which mirrors the specifications of the Company’s Nong Yao A facility, has been designed to also accommodate future growth opportunities through the eventual tie-in of additional oil accumulations both to the north and to the south of the Wassana field.

    The Company has selected Thai Nippon Steel Engineering & Construction Corporation Ltd (“Thai Nippon Steel”) for Engineering, Procurement, Construction, and Commissioning (“EPCC”) of the facility. Thai Nippon Steel is a very capable EPCC contractor with four decades experience in developing facilities of this type in Thailand.

    The contracting strategy selected by the Company ensures that more than 80% of the US$120 million facility capex is under fixed price commitments, with key long-lead items secured.

    Capital Investment & Development Timeline

    Total capex for the CPP and all of the export pipelines and facilities is estimated at US$120 million, of which approximately US$40 million is planned to be spent in 2025 with the remainder in 2026. The current plan is for the CPP to be fully installed and ready to commence development drilling at approximately the end of 2026. The initial drilling campaign comprises 16 horizontal development wells and one water injection well. Based on rig rates that the Company contracted in 2024, the estimated cost of each development well is approximately US$4.8 million. However, Valeura has observed a downward trend in jack-up drilling rig rates and materials in recent months, and therefore anticipates that drilling capex for the Wassana redevelopment may be lower if this trend continues. First oil from the new facility is planned for Q2 2027.

    Production Profile & Operating Efficiencies

    Once the initial development wells are completed, management estimates that the Wassana field will produce oil at rates of 10,000 bbls/d in the second half of 2027. The target plateau rate for the CPP is then above 7,500 bbls/d after the existing MOPU is decommissioned in late 2027. Once the CPP is operational, Valeura estimates that its operating characteristics will be approximately consistent with the performance of the Nong Yao A facility, which bears Adjusted Opex per bbl (a non-IFRS measure, more fully described in the Company’s May 14, 2025 Management’s Discussion and Analysis) in the range of US$12 – 16/bbl. This is anticipated to reduce the Company’s overall Adjusted Opex per bbl, thereby making the development value accretive and the portfolio more resilient.

    Expansion Potential & Economic Resilience

    The updated EOFL for the Wassana field is 2043 (see below) and the CPP will be constructed to include two risers to allow for satellite field tiebacks. Accumulations of oil have already been identified to the north of Wassana at the Nirami field, which may form the basis for one satellite development, and the Company is reprocessing 3D seismic south of the Wassana field in the vicinity of the Mayura oil discovery to support further appraisal drilling in this area. Development of these satellites would extend both the plateau production from the CPP and also the ultimate field life. The CPP concept facilitates the development of satellite fields with minimal wellhead platform infrastructure, resulting in the potential for cost-efficient tieback operations; the Company envisages such incremental production bearing even lower Adjusted Opex than the cost of the production tied directly to the CPP.

    Valeura has thoroughly evaluated the economics of the CPP redevelopment project, and believes the project presents a compelling investment proposition. All of the Company’s investments are scrutinised based on oil price sensitivities, and in this instance, even at Brent crude oil benchmark prices of US$60/bbl, management estimates that Wassana will generate an IRR in excess of 40% and a payback of 18 months, underscoring the resilience and strong economics of the redevelopment.

    Wassana Reserves and Resources Update

    Valeura has commissioned Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc. (“NSAI”) to assess the reserves and contingent resources for its Wassana field in light of the decision to pursue the Wassana redevelopment. For clarity, NSAI’s evaluation only addresses the G10/48 licence, the Company’s other assets were not re-evaluated. NSAI’s evaluation is presented in a report dated May 14, 2025 (the “NSAI Wassana FID Report”) and is based on an effective date of December 31, 2024 so as to be consistent with previous NSAI evaluations of the Company’s reserves and resources.

    The NSAI Wassana FID Report includes those oil accumulations on the Wassana field that have already been encountered and derisked through the Company’s drilling programme in 2023, in addition to known accumulations which are being accessed through the existing Wassana infrastructure. All reserves on the G10/48 licence are deemed to be heavy oil reserves.

    Wassana Heavy Oil Reserves Gross (Before Royalties) Reserves, Working Interest Share
    (mbbls)
    Proved Producing Developed 1,851
    Non-Producing Developed 198
    Undeveloped 13,364
    Total Proved (1P) 15,413
    Total Probable (P2) 5,136
    Total Proved + Probable (2P) 20,549
    Total Possible (P3) 2,148
    Total Proved + Probable + Possible (3P) 22,697
       

    Valeura notes that NSAI’s previous assessment of Wassana reserves, the NSAI 2024 Report, as more fully described in the Company’s February 13, 2025 press release, was based on the most conservative redevelopment concept that delivered relatively low reserves. With FID of the CPP-based redevelopment concept, NSAI is now able to use the planned CPP facility, increased number of wells, and their associated production profiles and cost to estimate the reserves indicated above, which in all instances, are higher than those in the NSAI 2024 Report.

    Net present values of future net revenue from oil reserves are based on forecast Brent crude oil reference prices of US$75.58, US$78.51, US$79.89, US$81.82, and US$83.46 per bbl for the years ending December 31, 2025, 2026, 2027, 2028, and 2029, respectively, with 2% escalation thereafter. NSAI assumes cost inflation of 2% per annum. Price realisation forecasts are based on the Brent crude oil reference prices above, and adjusted for oil quality, and market differentials.

    The estimated 2P NPV10 after income taxes from the Wassana field is US$218.2 million.

    Wassana Future Net Revenue Before Tax NPV10
    (US$ million)
    After Tax NPV10
    (US$ million)
    Proved Producing Developed (30.0) (30.0)
    Non-Producing Developed 13.7 13.7
    Undeveloped 273.5 200.9
    Total Proved (1P) 257.2 184.6
    Total Probable (P2) 97.3 33.7
    Total Proved + Probable (2P) 354.5 218.2
    Total Possible (P3) 97.5 48.3
    Total Proved + Probable + Possible (3P) 452.0 266.5
         

    The NSAI 2024 Report indicated a 2P NPV10 of US$126.6 million after income taxes, which implies that the redevelopment project adds US$91.6 million in incremental value. Expressed in Canadian dollars (using an US$/C$ exchange rate of 1.435), the incremental 2P NPV10 is C$131.4 million after income taxes, which, on a per share basis equates to a value add of C$1.23/share. These estimates are based on the same assumptions set out in the Company’s February 13, 2025 press release, which assumed a US$/C$ exchange rate of 1.435 and 106.65 million common shares outstanding, as at December 31, 2024. As a result, the Company estimates a current NAV of C$14.84/share, based on the sum of the 2P NPV10 and the Company’s cash as of December 31, 2024, which was US$259.4 million.

    With this update, the Company’s 2P reserves as of year-end 2024 are increased to 57.6 mmbbls which yields a reserve life index (“RLI”) of 6.5 years. The Wassana field illustrates the potential for Gulf of Thailand fields to continue adding reserves and extending economic field life. The Company has increased its reserves life every year since assuming operatorship.

      Gross (Before Royalties) Reserves, Working Interest Share (mbbls)
    Reserves by Field Jasmine (Light/ Medium)(1) Manora (Light/ Medium)(1) Nong Yao (Light/ Medium)(1) Wassana (Heavy)(2) Total
    Proved Producing Developed 5,268 1,370 6,541 1,851 15,030
    Non-Producing Developed 703 433 153 198 1,487
    Undeveloped 4,713 705 3,742 13,364 22,524
    Total Proved (1P) 10,684 2,509 10,436 15,413 39,042
    Total Probable (P2) 6,108 848 6,500 5,136 18,592
    Total Proved + Probable (2P) 16,792 3,357 16,936 20,549 57,634
    Total Possible (P3) 3,647 718 4,297 2,148 10,810
    Total Proved + Probable + Possible (3P) 20,440 4,075 21,233 22,697 68,445
               

    (1) NSAI 2024 Report
    (2) NSAI Wassana FID Report

    NSAI also assessed contingent resources for the G10/48 licence. Best estimate (2C) contingent resources are reduced from 12.7 mmbbls to 6.2 mmbbls on an unrisked basis. This reduction is largely due to a significant portion of the contingent resource moving into reserves with the approval of the new project. The majority of the remaining contingent resources are associated with the Nirami Field to the north with some also associated with the Mayura discovery to the south.

    Contingent Resources NSAI Wassana FID Report
    Unrisked (mmbbls) Risked (mmbbls)
    Low Estimate (1C) 6.5 3.6
    Best Estimate (2C) 6.2 2.6
    High Estimate (3C) 9.3 3.4
         

    Guidance Update

    In light of anticipated 2025 spending of US$40 million on the Wassana redevelopment project, the Company’s guidance for Adjusted Capex (a non-IFRS measure, more fully described in the Company’s Management’s Discussion and Analysis dated May 14, 2025) has been revised to US$165 – 185 million for the full year 2025. The Company is also providing guidance on Free Cash Flow (a non-IFRS measure, being Adjusted Cash Flow from Operations less Adjusted Capex, both as more fully described in the Company’s Management’s Discussion and Analysis dated May 14, 2025). Under Valeura’s Updated 2025 Guidance, and based on benchmark Brent oil prices ranging from US$65 – 85/bbl, Free Cashflow Guidance is US$80 – 195 million.

    The Company’s guidance assumptions for average production, Adjusted Opex (a non-IFRS measure, more fully described in the Company’s Management’s Discussion and Analysis dated May 14, 2025), and Exploration expense are re-affirmed. In addition to spending on the Wassana redevelopment project in 2025, the Company’s Updated 2025 Guidance is based on the unchanged assumption of having one drilling rig on contract for the full year and conducting certain brownfield developments as previously disclosed. Adjusted Opex includes the cost of leasing certain vessels as part of its ongoing operations, including the Nong Yao C MOPU, the Jasmine field’s Floating Production Storage and Offloading vessel, as well as Floating Storage and Offloading vessels at the Manora and Wassana fields, and a warehouse. Such leases are expected to total approximately US$33 million, unchanged from the Original 2025 Guidance.

      Original 2025
    Guidance
    Updated 2025
    Guidance
    Average Daily Oil Production(1) 23.0 – 25.5 mbbls/d 23.0 – 25.5 mbbls/d
    Adjusted Opex US$215 – 245 million US$215 – 245 million
    Adjusted Capex US$125 – 150 million US$165 – 185 million
    Exploration expense Approximately US$11 million Approximately US$11 million
    Free Cash Flow US$112 – 227 million(2) US$80 – 195 million
         

    (1)   Working interest share production, before royalties.
    (2)   Illustrative Free Cash Fow guidance based on the Company’s Original 2025 Guidance assumptions.

    Also unchanged is the Company’s intention to fund its 2025 guidance spending through cash on hand plus cash flow generated from ongoing operations.    The Company continues to expect that these sources will continue to strengthen the Company’s balance sheet, concurrent with the Wassana redevelopment, thereby providing capacity for other growth projects, including inorganic opportunities.

    Webcast

    Valeura intends to comment on the Wassana redevelopment project as part of a management update presentation and Q&A session following its Annual General Meeting of Shareholders which is scheduled for today, May 14, 2025, at 4:00 P.M. in Calgary. Shareholders may attend in person, as further detailed in the Management’s Information Circular which was mailed to shareholders and is available on the Company’s website and on www.sedarplus.ca. A webcast of the live event is available with the link below. Shareholders who are unable to attend in person may submit written questions through the webcast system or by email to IR@valeuraenergy.com.

    Participants are advised to register for the online event in advance, using the following link: https://events.teams.microsoft.com/event/f0e30b40-c6bc-4673-bd84-b57491e1ba58@a196a1a0-4579-4a0c-b3a3-855f4db8f64b

    An audio only feed of the Meeting is available by phone using the Conference ID and dial-in numbers below:

    Conference ID: 239 311 896 799

    Dial-in numbers:

    Canada: (833) 845-9589,,49176158#
    Singapore: +65 6450 6302,,49176158#
    Thailand: +66 2 026 9035,,49176158#
    Türkiye: 0800 142 034779,,49176158#
    United Kingdom: 0800 640 3933,,49176158#
    United States: (833) 846-5630,,49176158#

    For further information, please contact:

    Valeura Energy Inc. (General Corporate Enquiries)                +65 6373 6940
    Sean Guest, President and CEO
    Yacine Ben-Meriem, CFO
    Contact@valeuraenergy.com

    Valeura Energy Inc. (Investor and Media Enquiries)                +1 403 975 6752 / +44 7392 940495
    Robin James Martin, Vice President, Communications and Investor Relations
    IR@valeuraenergy.com

    Contact details for the Company’s advisors, covering research analysts and joint brokers, including Auctus Advisors LLP, Canaccord Genuity Ltd (UK), Cormark Securities Inc., Research Capital Corporation, and Stifel Nicolaus Europe Limited, are listed on the Company’s website at www.valeuraenergy.com/investor-information/analysts/.

    About the Company

    Valeura Energy Inc. is a Canadian public company engaged in the exploration, development and production of petroleum and natural gas in Thailand and in Türkiye. The Company is pursuing a growth-oriented strategy and intends to re-invest into its producing asset portfolio and to deploy resources toward further organic and inorganic growth in Southeast Asia. Valeura aspires toward value accretive growth for stakeholders while adhering to high standards of environmental, social and governance responsibility.

    Additional information relating to Valeura is also available on SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.ca.

    Oil and Gas Advisories

    Reserves and contingent resources disclosed in this news release are based on an independent evaluation conducted by the incumbent independent petroleum engineering firm, NSAI with an effective date of December 31, 2024 and a preparation date of May 14, 2025 post-FID and February 13, 2025 pre-FID. The NSAI estimates of reserves and resources were prepared using guidelines outlined in the Canadian Oil and Gas Evaluation Handbook and in accordance with National Instrument 51-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Oil and Gas Activities. The reserves and contingent resources estimates disclosed in this news release are estimates only and there is no guarantee that the estimated reserves and contingent resources will be recovered.

    This news release contains a number of oil and gas metrics, including “NAV”, “RLI”, “EOFL”, and “IRR” which do not have standardised meanings or standard methods of calculation and therefore such measures may not be comparable to similar measures used by other companies. Such metrics are commonly used in the oil and gas industry and have been included herein to provide readers with additional measures to evaluate the Company’s performance; however, such measures are not reliable indicators of the future performance of the Company and future performance may not compare to the performance in previous periods.

    “NAV” is calculated by adding the estimated future net revenues based on a 10% discount rate to net cash, (which is comprised of cash less debt) as of December 31, 2024. NAV is expressed on a per share basis by dividing the total by basic common shares outstanding. NAV per share is not predictive and may not be reflective of current or future market prices for Valeura.

    “RLI” is calculated by dividing reserves by management’s estimated total production before royalties for 2025.

    “EOFL” is calculated by NSAI as the date at which the monthly net revenue generated by the field is equal to or less than the asset’s operating cost.

    “IRR” is used by management as a measure of the profitability of a potential investment. It is calculated as the discount rate that would result in a net present value of zero.

    Reserves

    Reserves are estimated remaining quantities of commercially recoverable oil, natural gas, and related substances anticipated to be recoverable from known accumulations, as of a given date, based on the analysis of drilling, geological, geophysical, and engineering data, the use of established technology, and specified economic conditions, which are generally accepted as being reasonable. Reserves are further categorised according to the level of certainty associated with the estimates and may be sub-classified based on development and production status.

    Proved reserves are those reserves that can be estimated with a high degree of certainty to be recoverable. It is likely that the actual remaining quantities recovered will exceed the estimated proved reserves.

    Developed reserves are those reserves that are expected to be recovered from existing wells and installed facilities or, if facilities have not been installed, that would involve a low expenditure (e.g., when compared to the cost of drilling a well) to put the reserves on production.

    Developed producing reserves are those reserves that are expected to be recovered from completion intervals open at the time of the estimate. These reserves may be currently producing or, if shut in, they must have previously been on production, and the date of resumption of production must be known with reasonable certainty.

    Developed non-producing reserves are those reserves that either have not been on production, or have previously been on production, but are shut in, and the date of resumption of production is unknown.

    Undeveloped reserves are those reserves expected to be recovered from known accumulations where a significant expenditure (e.g., when compared to the cost of drilling a well) is required to render them capable of production. They must fully meet the requirements of the reserves classification (proved, probable, possible) to which they are assigned.

    Probable reserves are those additional reserves that are less certain to be recovered than proved reserves. It is equally likely that the actual remaining quantities recovered will be greater or less than the sum of the estimated proved plus probable reserves.

    Possible reserves are those additional reserves that are less certain to be recovered than probable reserves. It is unlikely that the actual remaining quantities recovered will exceed the sum of the estimated proved plus probable plus possible reserves. There is a 10% probability that the quantities actually recovered will equal or exceed the sum of the estimated proved plus probable plus possible reserves.

    The estimated future net revenues disclosed in this news release do not necessarily represent the fair market value of the reserves associated therewith.

    The estimates of reserves and future net revenue for individual properties may not reflect the same confidence level as estimates of reserves and future net revenue for all properties, due to the effects of aggregation.

    Contingent Resources

    Contingent resources are those quantities of petroleum estimated, as of a given date, to be potentially recoverable from known accumulations using established technology or technology under development, but which are not currently considered to be commercially recoverable due to one or more contingencies. Contingencies are conditions that must be satisfied for a portion of contingent resources to be classified as reserves that are: (a) specific to the project being evaluated; and (b) expected to be resolved within a reasonable timeframe.

    Contingent resources are further categorised according to the level of certainty associated with the estimates and may be sub‐classified based on a project maturity and/or characterised by their economic status. There are three classifications of contingent resources: low estimate, best estimate and high estimate. Best estimate is a classification of estimated resources described in the Canadian Oil and Gas Evaluation Handbook as the best estimate of the quantity that will be actually recovered; it is equally likely that the actual remaining quantities recovered will be greater or less than the best estimate. If probabilistic methods are used, there should be at least a 50 percent probability that the quantities actually recovered will equal or exceed the best estimate.

    The project maturity subclasses include development pending, development on hold, development unclarified and development not viable. The contingent resources disclosed in this news release are classified as either development on hold, development unclarified, or development not viable.

    Development on hold is defined as a contingent resource where there is a reasonable chance of development, but there are major non-technical contingencies to be resolved that are usually beyond the control of the operator.

    Development unclarified is defined as a contingent resource that requires further appraisal to clarify the potential for development and has been assigned a lower chance of development until commercial considerations can be clearly defined. Chance of development is the likelihood that an accumulation will be commercially developed.

    Conversion of the development unclarified resources referred to in this news release is dependent upon (1) the expected timetable for development; (2) the economics of the project; (3) the marketability of the oil and gas production; (4) the availability of infrastructure and technology; (5) the political, regulatory, and environmental conditions; (6) the project maturity and definition; (7) the availability of capital; and, ultimately, (8) the decision of joint venture partners to undertake development.

    The major positive factor relevant to the estimate of the contingent development unclarified resources referred to in this news release is the successful discovery of resources encountered in appraisal and development wells within the existing fields. The major negative factors relevant to the estimate of the contingent development unclarified resources referred to in this news release are: (1) the outstanding requirement for a definitive development plan; (2) current economic conditions do not support the resource development; (3) limited field economic life to develop the resources; and (4) the outstanding requirement for a final investment decision and commitment of all joint venture partners.

    Development not viable is defined as a contingent resource where no further data acquisition or evaluation is currently planned and hence there is a low chance of development, there is usually less than a reasonable chance of economics of development being positive in the foreseeable future. The major negative factors relevant to the estimate of development not viable referred to in this news release are: (1) current economic conditions do not support the resource development; and (2) availability of technical knowledge and technology within the industry to economically support resource development.

    If these contingencies are successfully addressed, some portion of these contingent resources may be reclassified as reserves.

    Of the best estimate 2C contingent resources estimated in the NSAI Wassana FID Report, on a risked basis: 100% of the estimated volumes are heavy oil; less than 1% are categorised as Development Not Viable, with the remainder categorised as Development Unclarified. There are no Development On Hold resources within the 2C category.

    Resources Project
    Maturity Subclass
    Heavy Crude Oil
    (Development On Hold)
    Chance of Development (%)
    Unrisked Risked
    Gross (mbbls) Net (mbbls) Gross (mbbls) Net (mbbls)
    Contingent Low Estimate (1C) Development Not Viable 1,715.7 1,617.1 1,544.2 1,455.4 90%
    Contingent Best Estimate (2C) Development Not Viable 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 90%
    Contingent High Estimate (3C) Development Not Viable 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 90%
    Resources Project
    Maturity Subclass
    Heavy Crude Oil
    (Development Unclarified)
    Chance of Development (%)
    Unrisked Risked
    Gross (mbbls) Net (mbbls) Gross (mbbls) Net (mbbls)
    Contingent Low Estimate (1C) Development Not Viable 4,294.9 4,047.9 1,937.8 1,826.4 10-60%
    Contingent Best Estimate (2C) Development Not Viable 6,072.4 5,723.3 2,583.4 2,434.9 10-60%
    Contingent High Estimate (3C) Development Not Viable 9,221.9 8,691.6 3,378.2 3,183.9 10-60%
    Resources Project
    Maturity Subclass
    Heavy Crude Oil
    (Development Not Viable)
    Chance of Development (%)
    Unrisked Risked
    Gross (mbbls) Net (mbbls) Gross (mbbls) Net (mbbls)
    Contingent Low Estimate (1C) Development Not Viable 493.2 464.9 74.0 69.7 15%
    Contingent Best Estimate (2C) Development Not Viable 85.8 80.9 12.9 12.1 15%
    Contingent High Estimate (3C) Development Not Viable 58.5 55.1 8.8 8.3 15%

       
    The NSAI estimates have been risked, using the chance of development, to account for the possibility that the contingencies are not successfully addressed. Due to the early stage of development for the development unclarified resources, NSAI did not perform an economic analysis of these resources; as such, the economic status of these resources is undetermined and there is uncertainty that any portion of the contingent resources disclosed in this new release will be commercially viable to produce.

    Glossary

    bbl                barrels of oil
    mbbl            thousand barrels of oil
    mmbbl         million barrels of oil

    Advisory and Caution Regarding Forward-Looking Information

    Certain information included in this news release constitutes forward-looking information under applicable securities legislation. Such forward-looking information is for the purpose of explaining management’s current expectations and plans relating to the future. Readers are cautioned that reliance on such information may not be appropriate for other purposes, such as making investment decisions. Forward-looking information typically contains statements with words such as “anticipate”, “believe”, “expect”, “plan”, “intend”, “estimate”, “propose”, “project”, “target” or similar words suggesting future outcomes or statements regarding an outlook.

    Forward-looking information in this news release includes, but is not limited to: the description of the Wassana redevelopment; timing for first oil from the Wassana redevelopment; anticipated production rates from the Wassana field and extension of its economic field life; anticipated capital spending and the timing thereof; sources of funding for the project; anticipated rates of return; the EPCC contractor for the Wassana redevelopment; the Wassana redevelopment development timeline; projections for Wassana’s future unit operating costs and Adjusted Opex, and for the cost of production from potential future satellite developments; the opportunities for further growth and cash flow generation; anticipated future rates for drilling rig rates (and trends) and drilling-related materials; and the Company’s updated guidance estimates for 2025.

    In addition, statements related to “reserves” and “resources” are deemed to be forward-looking information as they involve the implied assessment, based on certain estimates and assumptions, that the resources can be discovered and profitably produced in the future.

    Although the Company believes the expectations and assumptions reflected in such forward-looking information are reasonable, they may prove to be incorrect.

    Forward-looking information is based on management’s current expectations and assumptions regarding, among other things: political stability of the areas in which the Company is operating; continued safety of operations and ability to proceed in a timely manner; continued operations of and approvals forthcoming from governments and regulators in a manner consistent with past conduct; ability to achieve extensions to licences in Thailand and Türkiye to support attractive development and resource recovery; future drilling activity on the required/expected timelines; the prospectivity of the Company’s lands; the continued favourable pricing and operating netbacks across its business; future production rates and associated operating netbacks and cash flow; decline rates; future sources of funding; future economic conditions; the impact of inflation of future costs; future currency exchange rates; interest rates; the ability to meet drilling deadlines and fulfil commitments under licences and leases; future commodity prices; the impact of the Russian invasion of Ukraine; the impact of conflicts in the Middle East; royalty rates and taxes; management’s estimate of cumulative tax losses being correct; future capital and other expenditures; the success obtained in drilling new wells and working over existing wellbores; the performance of wells and facilities; the availability of the required capital to funds its exploration, development and other operations, and the ability of the Company to meet its commitments and financial obligations; the ability of the Company to secure adequate processing, transportation, fractionation and storage capacity on acceptable terms; the capacity and reliability of facilities; the application of regulatory requirements respecting abandonment and reclamation; the recoverability of the Company’s reserves and contingent resources; future growth; the sufficiency of budgeted capital expenditures in carrying out planned activities; the impact of increasing competition; the availability and identification of mergers and acquisition opportunities; the ability to successfully negotiate and complete any mergers and acquisition opportunities; the ability to efficiently integrate assets and employees acquired through acquisitions; global energy policies going forward; international trade policies; future debt levels; and the Company’s continued ability to obtain and retain qualified staff and equipment in a timely and cost efficient manner. In addition, the Company’s work programmes and budgets are in part based upon expected agreement among joint venture partners and associated exploration, development and marketing plans and anticipated costs and sales prices, which are subject to change based on, among other things, the actual results of drilling and related activity, availability of drilling, offshore storage and offloading facilities and other specialised oilfield equipment and service providers, changes in partners’ plans and unexpected delays and changes in market conditions. Although the Company believes the expectations and assumptions reflected in such forward-looking information are reasonable, they may prove to be incorrect.

    Forward-looking information involves significant known and unknown risks and uncertainties. Exploration, appraisal, and development of oil and natural gas reserves and resources are speculative activities and involve a degree of risk. A number of factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated by the Company including, but not limited to: the ability of management to execute its business plan or realise anticipated benefits from acquisitions; the risk of disruptions from public health emergencies and/or pandemics; competition for specialised equipment and human resources; the Company’s ability to manage growth; the Company’s ability to manage the costs related to inflation; disruption in supply chains; the risk of currency fluctuations; changes in interest rates, oil and gas prices and netbacks; the risk that the Company’s tax advisors’ and/or auditors’ assessment of the Company’s cumulative tax losses varies significantly from management’s expectations of the same; potential changes in joint venture partner strategies and participation in work programmes; uncertainty regarding the contemplated timelines and costs for work programme execution; the risks of disruption to operations and access to worksites; potential changes in laws and regulations, including international treaties and trade policies; the uncertainty regarding government and other approvals; counterparty risk; the risk that financing may not be available; risks associated with weather delays and natural disasters; and the risk associated with international activity. See the most recent annual information form and management’s discussion and analysis of the Company for a detailed discussion of the risk factors.

    Certain forward-looking information in this news release may also constitute “financial outlook” within the meaning of applicable securities legislation. Financial outlook involves statements about Valeura’s prospective financial performance or position and is based on and subject to the assumptions and risk factors described above in respect of forward-looking information generally as well as any other specific assumptions and risk factors in relation to such financial outlook noted in this news release. Such assumptions are based on management’s assessment of the relevant information currently available, and any financial outlook included in this news release is made as of the date hereof and provided for the purpose of helping readers understand Valeura’s current expectations and plans for the future. Readers are cautioned that reliance on any financial outlook may not be appropriate for other purposes or in other circumstances and that the risk factors described above or other factors may cause actual results to differ materially from any financial outlook.

    The forward-looking information contained in this news release is made as of the date hereof and the Company undertakes no obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking information, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, unless required by applicable securities laws. The forward-looking information contained in this news release is expressly qualified by this cautionary statement.

    This news release does not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy securities in any jurisdiction, including where such offer would be unlawful. This news release is not for distribution or release, directly or indirectly, in or into the United States, Ireland, the Republic of South Africa or Japan or any other jurisdiction in which its publication or distribution would be unlawful.

    Neither the Toronto Stock Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the Toronto Stock Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this news release.

    This information is provided by Reach, the non-regulatory press release distribution service of RNS, part of the London Stock Exchange. Terms and conditions relating to the use and distribution of this information may apply. For further information, please contact rns@lseg.com or visit www.rns.com.

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI USA: VIDEO: During Ways & Means Committee Markup, Rep. Jimmy Gomez Blasts Republican Tax Bill for Raising Taxes on Americans Making Under $30,000

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Jimmy Gomez (CA-34)

    Watch Rep. Gomez’s remarks HERE.

    WASHINGTON, DC — During a House Ways and Means Committee markup, Representative Jimmy Gomez (CA-34) called out House Republicans for proposing a tax bill that raises federal taxes on Americans earning less than $30,000 a year — while giving massive tax breaks to billionaires and big corporations. Citing data from the nonpartisan Joint Committee on Taxation, Gomez highlighted that by 2031, individuals making less than $15,000 a year would see their federal taxes increase by 74.3%, and those earning between $15,000 and $30,000 would see an increase of 20.6%.

    Gomez condemned his Republican colleagues for pushing a bill that hurts the very people they claim to protect: “You have no shame when it comes to hurting working men and women in this country. I was someone who was never supposed to go to college. I worked at Subway. I worked at Target. I made $700 a week — not from 9 to 5, but from 5 p.m. to 9 a.m. the next day. And I had zero health care. And you expect people in that position to believe you’re helping them? That billionaires deserve more help than they do? That’s your logic.”

    Data from the Joint Committee on Taxation’s analysis of the Republican tax bill.

    Gomez also called out the hypocrisy of cutting Medicaid and raising taxes on low-income parents while promoting family growth: “You want to tout a tax plan that increases taxes on people making under $30,000 a year, cuts their Medicaid, and then turns around and tells them to have more babies. That is the most insulting thing I’ve ever heard in my life.”

    For more updates from Congressman Gomez, follow @RepJimmyGomez on InstagramFacebookThreads, and X.

    ###

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-Evening Report: Soon, your boss will have to pay your wages and super at the same time. Here’s how everyone could benefit

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Helen Hodgson, Professor, Curtin Law School and Curtin Business School, Curtin University

    Dragon Images/Shutterstock

    If you have a job in Australia, you’ve probably noticed each of your payslips has a section telling you how much superannuation will be paid alongside your wages.

    But while your wages are deposited in your bank account however frequently you receive a payslip – whether that’s weekly, fortnightly or monthly – it’s a different story for your super.

    Under current superannuation laws, employers are only required to pay super into an employee’s nominated fund at least four times a year – 28 days after the end of each quarter – although many do pay more regularly.

    But that’s set to change. From July 1 2026, new “payday super” rules will require employers to pay super into the employee’s fund within seven days of wages.

    This reform was announced in the 2023–24 federal budget, allowing employers, superannuation funds and software providers three years to set up compliant systems. But it hasn’t yet been legislated.

    Now, some industry groups are calling for a further delay of up to two years. So, who are these reforms designed to benefit? And does business really need more time to get ready?

    Missing or incorrect super

    Missing or incorrect super payments present a huge problem for Australia’s retirement system.

    The Super Members Council claims one in four Australians are missing out on the correct amount of superannuation contributions.

    Missing super payments are a multi-billion dollar problem.
    Wara1982/Shutterstock

    The Australian Taxation Office (ATO) estimates A$5.2 billion of guaranteed superannuation went unpaid in 2021–22.

    This can be due to payroll errors, misclassification under an award or, in extreme cases, non-payment of superannuation as a form of wage theft. All these things can be harder to spot when super is paid less frequently.

    Rules only requiring super to be paid quarterly may have been appropriate 30 years ago, in the early days of the superannuation guarantee. Business systems were often not computerised, and wages were often paid in cash.

    Times have changed

    Payroll systems are now much more sophisticated.

    From 2018, the federal government rolled out the single-touch payroll program that requires employers to report wages in real time, including details of superannuation guarantee withheld from an employee’s wages.

    The government is already benefiting from the increased automation of data submitted through this system.

    Single-touch payroll data helps improve official labour statistics and provides up-to-date income information for employees through the MyGov portal.

    Sending real-time data to Centrelink addresses one of the major flaws underpinning the Robodebt scandal, which used an averaging system to estimate fortnightly earnings.

    Benefits for employees

    In simple terms, the coming changes are basically a change in timing. Payments will be transferred to an employee’s super fund in the same way their wages are transferred directly to their bank account.

    Once bedded down, the changes will provide benefits across the board to employees, employers and the government.

    Currently, if an employee believes the correct amount of superannuation is not being paid to their fund, they are expected to follow this up directly with the ATO.

    Unfortunately, many employees presume the withheld amount shown on the payslip has already been paid into their super account.

    Unless a member is actively monitoring their super balance, they may be unaware that the amount shown on their payslip is not being paid into their fund on a timely basis.

    Payday super changes could help employees more easily check their super is being paid.
    Chay_Tee/Shutterstock

    Benefits for business

    Employers should also benefit from these changes, many of whom already do transfer superannuation when wages are paid.

    Currently, superannuation guarantee payments are run on a separate payment cycle to payroll, coinciding with payment of tax liabilities. If payments are on the same cycle as payroll, it should make budgeting easier, and ensure the separate super payment run is not overlooked.

    This assumes, of course, that the business is not relying on unpaid superannuation contributions to manage their cash flows elsewhere in the business. If that is the case, payday super changes will help protect the employee if the employer runs into financial difficulties.

    The change will also allow the tax office to match deductions and payments in real time to detect fraud – and check that super is actually being paid. This can reduce audit costs and – in the long run – reduce reliance on the aged pension as super account balances improve.

    Why wait any longer?

    So, with all of these expected benefits, why has the financial services sector this month asked for implementation to be delayed further – by up to two years? The building blocks of the system – electronic payments to transfer funds and the government’s single-touch payroll gateway – are already in place.

    One challenge is legislative. Although announced in May 2023, the draft legislation was only released for consultation in March 2025.

    The Superannuation Guarantee (Administration) Act 1992 needs extensive amendments to rewrite references to the calculation and payment of the superannuation guarantee charge.

    The draft legislation also makes some changes to definitions that may impact on how systems must be set up for payday super. Although not intended to change entitlements, they need to be made accurate in the software.

    Still, payday super has the potential to strengthen Australia’s superannuation system, protecting employee contributions and smoothing the payment system for employers. Concerns around its implementation are largely due to the time it has taken for the draft legislation to emerge.

    Following the election, the federal government has the numbers to pass this legislation as a matter of priority.

    Helen Hodgson has received funding from the ARC, AHURI and CPA Australia. Helen is the Chair of the Social Policy Committee and a Director of the National Foundation for Australian Women (NFAW). Helen was a Member of the WA Legislative Council from 1997 to 2001, elected as an Australian Democrat. She is not a current member of any political party. She is a Registered Tax Agent and a member of the SMSF Association, CPA Australia and The Tax Institute. Helen has superannuation with Unisuper and jointly owns positively geared rental properties.

    ref. Soon, your boss will have to pay your wages and super at the same time. Here’s how everyone could benefit – https://theconversation.com/soon-your-boss-will-have-to-pay-your-wages-and-super-at-the-same-time-heres-how-everyone-could-benefit-256564

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-OSI USA: Sánchez, Davis, DelBene champion bill to reduce child care costs for working families

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Congresswoman Linda Sanchez (38th District of CA)

    In contrast to GOP effort to slash child care funding, this bill increases maximum child care credit by nearly 400 percent

    WASHINGTON – Representatives Linda Sánchez (D-Calif.), Danny K. Davis (D-Ill.) and Suzan DelBene (D-Wash.) introduced the Child and Dependent Care Tax Credit Enhancement Act to permanently expand the child care tax credit. The bill would raise the maximum credit from $1,050 to $4,000 for one child and from $2,100 to $8,000 for two or more children. 

    Senators Tina Smith (D-Minn.), Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) and Patty Murray (D-Wash.) introduced companion legislation in the Senate.

    “Working parents shouldn’t have to choose between earning a paycheck and caring for their kids,” said Sánchez. “Expanding the child care tax credit will make child care more affordable and accessible, so parents can focus on their work knowing their kids are being cared for.”

    “High-quality, affordable child care is essential to the economic well-being of families, businesses, and our country,” said Rep. Davis. “I am proud to lead the Child and Dependent Care Tax Credit Enhancement Act that would restore the 2021 credit so that families can receive up to $4,000 for child care for one child or up to $8,000 for two or more children, much better than the almost $600 that the typical family receives currently. This bill would strengthen the financial well-being of families and grow our economy. It is critical that Congress acts now to help working families.”

    “Access to affordable child care is one of the biggest barriers families face. Enhancing the Child and Dependent Care Tax Credit will give parents the relief they need by supporting both families and care providers,” said DelBene. “This bill is a commonsense step toward making child care more accessible and affordable for every family.” 

    The Child and Dependent Care Tax Credit (CDCTC) is the only tax credit that helps working parents offset the rising cost of child care. In 2021, Democrats successfully enhanced both the CDCTC and the Child Tax Credit because both credits are essential to support parents’ ability to provide for their families. While 100 percent of the CDCTC reimburses parents for actual child care costs paid to work, parents mostly use the Child Tax Credit to defray other significant costs of caring for a child, such as food, rent, and clothing. 

    As currently structured, the CDCTC unfortunately fails to meet the needs of tens of millions of working families. Very few families receive meaningful benefit from the credit due to the extremely low phase-out level of $15,000, the low expense limits, the non-refundable nature, and the loss of benefit due to inflation. For example, the Tax Policy Center estimates that only 13 percent of families with children claimed the CDCTC in 2022. The Child Care and Dependent Credit Enhancement Act will increase the maximum credit amount to $4,000 per child up to $8,000 for two or more children, expand eligibility to low-income families, make the credit available to married couples who file separately due to high student loan debt, and retain the credit’s value over time by indexing it to inflation. Compared to 2019, low-income working parents quadrupled their credit received in 2021. 

    High-quality, affordable child care is essential to the economic well-being of families, businesses, and our country. Yet, child care places a major financial burden on American families. The price of child care can range from $5,357 to $17,171 per year depending on location and type of care. Astoundingly, the cost of center-based care for two children is more than the average mortgage in 41 states and more than the average annual rent in all 50 states plus DC. Households under the poverty line spend nearly one third of their income on child care, and increases in median child care prices are connected to lower maternal employment rates. Further, the child care crisis hits families of color disproportionately hard. For a single parent who has never been married who is Black, Hawaiian/Pacific Islander, or American Indian/Alaska Native, child care can cost 36 percent, 41 percent, or 49 percent of the median income, respectively, compared to only 31 percent for single white parents. Further, Latino and American Indian and Alaska Native parents disproportionately live in child care deserts.

    Statements from Supporting Organizations

    The bill is endorsed by state and national child and worker advocates, including: Center for Law and Social Policy, Child Care Aware of America, Early Care and Education Consortium, First Five Years Fund, First Focus Campaign for Children, MomsRising, National Association for the Education of Young Children, National Women’s Law Center Action Fund, Save the Children, Start Early, Society for Human Resource Management, and ZERO TO THREE.

    “Often conflated with the child tax credit, the Child and Dependent Care Tax Credit is one of the only tax incentives that helps working families with their child care expenses. As the cost of care increases, many families must contend with whether their current job pays enough to justify their child care expenses,” said Radha Mohan, executive director, Early Care and Education Consortium. “For families where one parent must leave the workforce because they cannot afford the cost of care, this often hurts the family from an economic standpoint in the long run. The CDCTC Enhancement Act helps ensure that families do not have to make this choice by providing a credit to offset the cost of care. When paired with programs such as the Child Care and Development Block Grant, this bill will ensure that many families will have reduced their child care costs by over 50 percent.”

    “As almost any working family with young children will tell you, the cost of child care is a major source of financial stress, putting immense pressure on already tight budgets,” said Sarah Rittling,executive director, First Five Years Fund. “The Child and Dependent Care Tax Credit Enhancement Act would make essential updates to the CDCTC to ensure more parents are able to keep more of what they earn to offset the high cost of care. We are grateful to Reps. Danny Davis, Suzan DelBene, and Linda Sanchez for their leadership and commitment to supporting families with young children.” 

    “For families with young children, the cost of childcare is often unaffordable and impacts their economic opportunity – the cornerstone of child and family well-being. The Child and Dependent Care Tax Credit Enhancement Act of 2025 is an important effort to update the CDCTC to ensure that more families can offset their child care costs. We are grateful to Rep. Danny Davis and his longstanding efforts to support children and families in his district and across the country, and also extend that appreciation to Reps. Suzan DelBene and Linda Sanchez., said Diana Rauner, president, Start Early.

    “Affordable child care isn’t a luxury – it’s the backbone of our economy,” said Yelena Tsilker, senior government relations and advocacy director, ZERO TO THREE. “Parents of infants now face child care bills that top $16,000 a year – higher than in-state college tuition in many states. The Child and Dependent Care Tax Credit Enhancement Act tackles that crisis head-on by making the CDCTC fully refundable and increasing the maximum credit, so families of every income can choose the high-quality care their babies need. This relief will keep parents in the workforce and help millions of children thrive. We applaud Representatives Davis, DelBene, and Sánchez for championing legislation that hard-working families have long awaited.” 

    The text of the bill is available HERE; a summary of the bill is available HERE

    ###

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Sánchez on Republican tax bill: Don’t buy the bullshit

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Congresswoman Linda Sanchez (38th District of CA)

    WASHINGTON – Congresswoman Linda T. Sánchez (D-Calif.) delivered an opening statement during the Ways and Means Committee’s markup of the Republican tax bill.

    Video of her opening statement is available HERE and the text follows:

    “Well, here we go again.

    Republicans are once again choosing billionaires and big corporations over working families. This bill that we are marking up today is an insult to every hardworking American. It sends a very clear message: that you’ll pay more, and you’ll receive fewer services – just so that billionaires can pocket another tax cut that they really don’t need.

    American families, in case you have noticed, are struggling. Under President Trump and Republican leadership, they have seen nothing but chaos. They’ve watched Elon Musk gleefully take a chainsaw to vital programs that they rely on, like Social Security, Medicare, and the VA. Travel is less safe at airports because they are left in disarray due to the cuts to our air traffic control systems.

    Prices for everyday necessities – like food, clothing, diapers, and formula – keep rising because of Trump’s tariffs. Premiums for health insurance, car insurance, and housing are going up, making it harder and harder for families to make ends meet.

    And now, rather than providing real relief, Republicans want to look at this chaos, put it into law, and call it ‘one beautiful bill.’ All to pay for more tax cuts for the rich while adding [trillions] to our national debt.

    Nearly $20 trillion in debt over the next ten years by Republicans’ own members’ own estimates. Not our estimates – their estimates. Americans are worried about their future. Consumer confidence is at a record low. People are afraid of losing their jobs, their health care, student aid, and food assistance.

    And this bill today compounds that pain. 14 million people will lose health care coverage under this plan. And for what? Again, so billionaires can get even richer while we all drown in debt. This is outrageous. Billionaires already have more money than they could ever spend. They can afford to pay their fair share.

    What’s equally disturbing is you’re not being honest about the fact that you are meting out crumbs to the most needy while you are helping the most wealthy. And don’t buy the bullshit that tax cuts for the rich create more jobs or better wages. It’s been the excuse under every Republican administration in the last half-century to pass more and more tax cuts to the rich.

    And it has failed to deliver on that promise each and every single time. The wealthy just got richer while the working families got harmed. All while piling on more debt that families will have to pay off.

    I’m outraged that this committee is focused on doing more for the richest in this country while destroying the means of survival for the poorest. And this bill doubles down on that assault on those seeking the American Dream by stealing tax benefits and services to working people who are paying taxes!

    It would deny the Child Tax Credit to 2 million U.S. citizen children. Even worse, it would deny Medicare coverage to those who’ve worked and paid into the system. How dare Republicans say they are for the working class when they’re making it harder for those struggling to get by?

    Enough is enough. My constituents are fed up. They’re sick and tired of Republican tax cuts that only benefit the ultra-wealthy. Our tax code needs to be about fairness. It needs to be about balance. It should support families, not the rich. But this bill does the exact opposite.

    To my Republican colleagues, I say: please just stop this insanity. You have to lie about what is in this bill; otherwise, probably, your constituents would be rioting in the streets. Here is an idea: how about you think about putting your constituents first for once, rather than the people who donate to your campaigns?

    But I guess that is asking a little too much from people who have completely lost their moral compass. I will be voting ‘no’ on this bill. I hope some on that side of the aisle see the light and do the same.”

    ###
     

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Beyer Opening Remarks In Ways & Means Markup Of Republican Tax Cut For The Wealthy

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Representative Don Beyer (D-VA)

    Congressman Don Beyer (D-VA) today delivered the following remarks during the opening stages of the House Ways and Means Committee’s markup of Republicans’ legislation to lower taxes for the wealthy while making the largest cut to Medicaid in history:

    Top-heavy tax cuts paid for by low-income benefit cuts.

    President Trump and the Republican majorities in Congress were narrowly elected – by little more than one percent – with the simple hope from the American people that they would lower costs.

    The President himself declared he would “bring prices down on day one.”

    Trump and Republicans are now breaking that promise.

    In fact, thanks in part to the unprecedented taxes Trump has imposed on the American people through his nonsensical tariff plan, prices remain high, and consumer inflation expectations have surged.

    Americans are seeing the evidence of his broken promise everywhere.

    When you buy a cup of coffee, or a used car, or a dozen eggs, we’re paying more now than we did before Trump took office.

    On top of that, under Trump’s reckless leadership, our economy took a nosedive in the first quarter of this year, the first time it’s contracted in years.

    Many other indicators are flashing red. Economic uncertainty is at a [long] time high, and the conversations around the kitchen table and in small businesses are the same: everybody’s scared.

    And that brings us to today.

    My Republican friends are hoping this multi trillion-dollar giveaway to the wealthy will somehow dig them out the hole the President has gotten them into.

    If history is any guide, more tax breaks for the rich won’t do much, if anything, to put the economy on firmer footing or provide lasting assistance for working- and middle-class Americans.

    Their model is the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. Trump and the Republicans want to extend it here, but look at it: it failed across the board.

    Wages didn’t rise any faster, the economy didn’t grow any faster, and the bill definitely didn’t pay for itself. It just exploded our national debt.

    And just like last time, dollar for dollar, the benefits in this bill overwhelmingly skew towards the ultra-wealthy.

    It’s nice to have my friends talk about the tax cuts on tips and the tax cuts on overtime, but this is a tiny part of this bill – a distraction from what’s really going on.

    They are trying to pull a fast one on the American people, by delivering massive, long-term benefits to millionaires and billionaires, while throwing a few temporary – temporary – tax breaks to working people, timed to help them get through one election cycle.

    The folks getting the most help in this legislation are the same folks who don’t bat an eye when prices go up at the grocery store or they buy a new car or they go on vacation, or they’re affected by the tariffs that cost average Americans at least $2,800 a year, according to Yale.

    The ultra-wealthy are the very last people that need a boost on their tax returns.

    And yet, my Republican colleagues closely attend to their needs in this bill, ensuring that their rates stay low, and estates worth tens of millions of dollars don’t get taxed, and the folks who manage hedge funds keep their special carried interest tax loophole.

    Making the legislation even worse is how my Republican friends plan on offsetting its eye-watering price tag.

    They want to undermine America’s fastest-growing, most affordable energy sources, and jack up utility bills for working families, and do their friends in Big Oil a big favor in the process.

    They want to cut food assistance programs for the poorest Americans, and they’re planning on ripping health insurance away from 14 million Americans, including kids, seniors, and people with disabilities.

    I have a constituent, Chris McCauley, with spastic quadriplegia, and he uses a wheelchair.

    Medicaid pays for his equipment and support programs during the day.

    Without the help of his dedicated caregivers, and the support Medicaid provides his mother, she wouldn’t have been able to work full-time and support her family as a single mom for the past 20 years.

    These are the kinds of families that this legislation will harm.

    All to help give their rich donors a tax break they don’t need, and that won’t change their lives at all.

    Trump and the Republicans have shown what their priorities are.

    At every turn, they choose to the help the rich, often by taking money directly out of the pockets of working Americans.

    This bill will be a disaster for the American people, and will further divide our society between the thoughtlessly-comfortable and the yearning discouraged.

    Top-heavy tax cuts paid for by low-income benefit cuts.

    I urge all of my colleagues to vote no.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: THOMPSON WELCOMES HOME FOURTH DISTRICT DACA RECIPIENT DENIED ENTRY BACK INTO U.S.

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Mike Thompson Representing the 5th District of CALIFORNIA

    Washington – Last week, U.S. Representative Mike Thompson (CA-04) sat down with a constituent and DACA recipient from California’s Fourth Congressional District who was denied entry back into the U.S. for weeks after a trip to Mexico due to a clerical error by U.S. Citizen and Immigration Services. The constituent, who is identified only as Jane Doe to remain anonymous, sat down with Rep. Thompson to discuss the harrowing incident and how Thompson and his team were able to intervene to bring her home. Watch the video HERE

    “Through no fault of her own, Jane was wrongfully denied re-entry from Mexico into the United States due to a paperwork error made by U.S. Citizen and Immigration Services. It’s sad that the federal government can make an error that causes a legal resident of the United States — in this case, my constituent — to have to miss three weeks of work, stay in a foreign country, and leave her family without their sole breadwinner for weeks. It took my office, my staff, and myself to intervene to get her home,” said Rep. Thompson

    “Constituent services are an important part of my job and my staff and I are dedicated to helping all of our constituents on any matters they have with the federal government.” 

    “When I was stranded in Mexico, I reached out to Congressman Thompson, him and his team listen to my story, they supported me and provided me with help to solve my situation. If not for them, I don’t think I would be here today. Thank you for everything,” said Jane Doe. 

    BACKGROUND 

    On March 26th, Jane Doe contacted Representative Thompson’s Washington, D.C. office to ask for help from the Congressman and his team. 

    Jane had traveled to Mexico legally after being granted an I-131 petition which allows a DACA recipient to leave the country and return for a justified reason. Jane filed her paperwork on time and without errors, and was granted the petition before leaving for her trip.  

    At the conclusion of her trip, Jane was denied entry onto the plane to fly home to the North Bay. Border patrol officials pointed out that the paperwork sent to Jane by the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) listed the wrong dates for her return, despite Jane filing for the correct dates.  

    Thompson’s office intervened to inquire with the USCIS San Francisco office as well as Customs & Border Control. Thompson and his team worked through USCIS to have Jane’s documents reissued and coordinated to have them couriered to Jane in Mexico. She was able to fly home on Saturday, April 27th.   

    Fourth District residents who face issues with passports and visas, veterans’ benefits, IRS issues, agricultural issues, small business assistance, immigration, Medicare and Medicaid, or any other problem navigating the federal government are encouraged to contact Rep. Thompson’s nearest office for support: 

    • Napa: (707) 226-9898
    • Santa Rosa: (707) 542-7182
    • Woodland: (530) 753-3501
    • Washington: (202) 225-3311

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: THOMPSON, STEUBE FOUND BIPARTISAN NATURAL DISASTER CAUCUS

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Mike Thompson Representing the 5th District of CALIFORNIA

    Washington – Today, Rep. Mike Thompson (D-CA-04) and Rep. Greg Steube (R-FL-17) announced that they have founded the bipartisan Natural Disaster Caucus. Members of the Natural Disaster Caucus are dedicated to natural disaster preparation, response, and relief. Reps. Thompson and Steube will serve as co-chairs of the caucus, which will provide resources for Members of Congress and their staff to help districts across our country prevent, prepare for, and respond to natural disasters.

    “Every community across our country is at risk of natural disasters, whether it’s wildfires, hurricanes, floods, earthquakes, or other disasters. It just makes sense that we work together to improve the ways in which we prepare for disasters, respond to them, and ultimately deliver relief to survivors,” said Thompson. “It’s great to partner with my colleague Rep. Greg Steube to establish this bipartisan caucus to continue our work preventing and responding to disasters.” 

    “Millions of Americans are impacted every year by natural disasters. When trials come, our constituents deserve to know their leaders are working together on their behalf in order to help them rebuild. I am pleased to partner with my colleagues on the Natural Disaster Caucus to advance common sense policies that will better prepare our communities for when the next natural disaster strikes,” said Steube.

    BACKGROUND 

    Natural disasters continue to impact Americans around the country. In 2024, there were 27 natural disasters in the United States, including droughts, floods, severe storms, cyclones, wildfires, and winter storms. These disasters led to over 500 deaths and incurred losses exceeding $180 billion. We must work to prepare for and respond to natural disasters to mitigate the widespread impacts. 

    Reps. Thompson and Steube founded the Natural Disaster Caucus following their successful effort to deliver disaster relief to survivors of wildfires in California’s 4th District and hurricanes in Florida’s 17th District.  

    Last Spring, Rep. Thompson and Rep. Greg Steube (FL-17) led a bipartisan group of 218 Members of Congress to successfully advance a discharge petition which forced House Speaker Mike Johnson to bring their bill, the Federal Disaster Tax Relief Act, to the House floor for a vote. The Federal Disaster Tax Relief Act supports the nearly 70,000 qualified survivors who suffered significant losses during three major federally declared California fires in 2015, 2017, and 2018 who received related settlement payments.

    At the time, the historic advancement of Rep. Thompson and Rep. Steube’s petition marked only the third time a House discharge petition had succeeded in the 21st Century. Their efforts succeeded as the Federal Disaster Tax Relief Act passed the Senate and was signed into law by President Biden at the end of 2024.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI China: Time-honored brands in Shanghai benefit from refined departure tax refund policy

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    Shanghai’s tax authority has revealed a shopping rush for foreigners during the May Day holiday, with vintage brands showing renewed charm.

    Official data showed the eastern Chinese city’s sales under the departure tax refund policy soared by 150 percent year-on-year, and refund amounts jumped 170 percent from May 1 to 5.

    The surge follows China’s latest revisions to its management measures for tax refunds on shopping by overseas tourists. Notably, the refund eligibility threshold has been more than halved from 500 yuan (about 69 U.S. dollars) to 200 yuan, a move that has galvanized participation from traditional food and retail sectors.

    Century-old Shanghai food brands such as Taikang Foods and Shao Wan Sheng have already registered as refund stores, while time-honored heavyweights like Cantonese cuisine shop Xinghualou, tea house Huang Long Tai, and First Foodhall, a one-stop shop for those looking for Chinese snacks and bites, are fast-tracking their entry into the program.

    “Tax refunds not only offer price advantages to global customers but also bridge our heritage brands with the inbound tourism market. We aim to convert ‘refund opportunities’ into ‘brand loyalty,’ revitalizing these century-old names,” said Lu Yanqing, an executive at Shao Wan Sheng.

    The policy’s impact is palpable in commercial hubs like Nanjing Road, a magnet for international tourists, where Jingdezhen porcelain shops saw holiday sales climb 38.7 percent. Cultural icons such as jade, silk and inkstones are also drawing foreign shoppers, with the Shanghai Silk Department Store Co., Ltd. generating 120,000 yuan in tax-refund sales via 30 transactions since the beginning of the year.

    By blending convenience with cultural appeal, the policy is redefining “Chinese aesthetics” as a portable global commodity.

    Efforts to expand refund-enabled outlets have transformed Nanjing Road into a tax-free shopping corridor, now home to 45 refund stores spanning food, apparel, healthcare, eyewear, jewelry and art. Among them are landmarks like Caitongdetang Pharmacy, Lao Feng Xiang Jewelry, and Duoyunxuan auction house, alongside vintage retailers such as New World City and Shanghai No.1 Department Store.

    In Hongkou District, high-end qipao brand Manloulan has joined the initiative, leveraging the policy to fuse Shanghai’s cultural heritage with global tastes.

    “Our Shanghai-style qipao collections integrate intangible cultural craftsmanship with international aesthetics, resonating strongly with overseas clients. Since becoming a refund store, foreign customers now account for 40 percent of our traffic, partially driving a 35-percent sales growth in first quarter,” shared Qiu Liming, president of the brand.

    Digital upgrades further enhance the experience: shoppers can pre-fill refund forms by scanning QR codes, while electronic invoices can be integrated into the departure tax refund system automatically, slashing the processing time.

    “This efficiency boosts Shanghai’s position as a leader in tourist-friendly tax refund services,” noted Zhang Xiaochun, Manloulan’s financial manager.

    “We’ll continue refining services to ensure overseas travelers benefit from tax refunds and feel the vibrancy of China’s consumer market,” a Shanghai tax bureau official said. 

    MIL OSI China News

  • MIL-OSI: Prairie Provident Resources Announces Successful Basal Quartz Drilling Program and First Quarter 2025 Results

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    CALGARY, Alberta, May 13, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Prairie Provident Resources Inc. (“Prairie Provident” or the “Company”) is pleased to announce strong production results from its three-well Basal Quartz (“BQ”) horizontal drilling program in the Michichi area of Central Alberta during the first quarter of 2025. The Company also announces financial and operating results for the first quarter ended March 31, 2025.

    SUCCESSFUL RESULTS FROM BASAL QUARTZ DRILLING PROGRAM

    The Company successfully drilled and completed three BQ horizontal wells that are now all on production. The wells were executed within budget and continue to demonstrate the high-quality geological and reservoir characteristics of the Michichi BQ play.

    The following table summarizes the initial production (“IP”) rates and key operational details for the three BQ wells drilled during the first quarter of 2025, which were brought on production in April 2025:

    Well Identifier Days from
    Spud to Rig
    Release
    Lateral
    Length

    (metres)
    Fracture
    Stages
    IP Period Medium
    Crude Oil
    (bbl/d)
    (1)
    Conventional
    Natural Gas
    (Mcf/d)
    (1)
    Total
    (boe/d)
    (1)
    Peak Oil
    Rate
    (bbl/d)
    (1)
    100/14-32-029-18W4 7 1,340 49 IP30 275 953 434 357
    102/13-32-029-18W4 7 1,319 48 IP21 328 1,052 503 367
    100/07-19-030-18W4 8 2,154 78 IP21 389 1,080 569 585
    (1)   Initial production rates are based on field estimates at wellhead. See “Advisories – Initial Production Rates” below.
         

    Total Company sales production for the first week of May 2025 averaged 3,467 boe/d (62.9% liquids)1, of which 1,567 boe/d (69.0% liquids)2 was from the three BQ wells drilled during the first quarter of 2025.

    These recent three wells validate Prairie Provident’s excitement with the emerging BQ/Ellerslie play on its Michichi lands. Direct offsetting operational activity continues to be strong. Legacy vertical well control, available 3D/2D seismic data, and offset drilling activity are important factors in de-risking the Michichi BQ play. Prairie Provident has identified more than 40 potential drilling opportunities targeting medium crude oil on its Michichi lands. The Company owns and controls key Michichi infrastructure, which provides a competitive advantage for the future development of this play, and has sizeable tax pools, including approximately $330 million of non-capital losses.

     _________

    1. Comprised of approximately 2,052 bbl/d of medium crude oil, 7,705 Mcf/d of conventional natural gas and 131 bbl/d of NGLs.
    2. Comprised of approximately 1,013 bbl/d of medium crude oil, 2,909 Mcf/d of conventional natural gas and 69 bbl/d of NGLs.


    FIRST QUARTER 2025 FINANCIAL AND OPERATING HIGHLIGHTS

    Prairie Provident’s interim financial statements for the first quarter ended March 31, 2025 and related Management’s Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) are available on our website at www.ppr.ca and filed on SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.ca. Financial and operating highlights for the period include:

    • In February and March of 2025, the Company completed a brokered equity financing raising aggregate gross proceeds of $8.67 million to facilitate further development in the BQ formation at Michichi.
    • In Q1 2025, the Company drilled three gross (3.0 net) new wells in the BQ formation. These wells were completed and brought on production in April 2025.
    • Production averaged 2,221 boe/d (58% liquids)1 for Q1 2025, which was 16% or 415 boe/d lower than Q1 2024, primarily due to the sale of the Company’s former Evi CGU in Q1 2024 and natural production declines.
    • Q1 2025 operating expenses were $29.64 boe/d, a decrease of 17% or $6.15 per boe/d from Q1 2024, principally due to the sale of the Evi CGU and certain Provost properties in Q1 2024 which experienced higher operational costs and partially offset by increases in workover costs.
    • Q1 2025 operating netback2 before the impact of derivatives was $3.7 million ($18.38/boe), and $3.7 million ($18.38/boe) after realized losses on derivatives, a 74% and a 115% increase, respectively, relative to Q1 2024. The increase was a result of slightly higher realized pricing, lower royalties and operating costs and no realized losses on derivatives.
    • Net loss totaled $6.1 million in Q1 2025, a $1.2 million increase compared to Q1 2024. The increase was due to lower petroleum and natural gas sales, higher G&A expenses, impairment expense and finance costs offset by lower operating expenses.

     _________

    1. Comprised of approximately 1,201 bbl/d of medium crude oil, 5,574 Mcf/d of conventional natural gas and 91 bbl/d of NGLs.
    2. Operating netback is a Non-GAAP financial measure and is defined below under “Advisories – Non-GAAP and Other Financial Measures”.


    FINANCIAL AND OPERATING SUMMARY

    ($000s, except per unit amounts or as indicated)     Q1 2025 Q4 2024 Q1 2024
              (Restated)(1)
    FINANCIAL          
    Revenue          
    Petroleum and natural gas sales     11,073   11,111   12,996  
    Royalties     (1,472 ) (567 ) (1,871 )
    Revenue     9,601   10,544   11,125  
    Realized gain (loss) on derivatives         (485 )
    Unrealized gain (loss) on derivatives         416  
    Revenue, net of gains (losses) on derivatives     9,601   10,544   11,056  
    Net loss(1)     (6,137 ) (10,123 ) (4,945 )
    $ per share – Basic       (0.01 ) (0.01 )
    $ per share – Diluted       (0.01 ) (0.01 )
    Adjusted Funds Flow(2)     1,782   (192 ) 27  
    $ per share – Basic          
    $ per share – Diluted          
    Capital expenditures(2)     8,023   9,083   578  
    Net capital expenditures(2)     8,099   9,023   (23,600 )
    Common Shares outstanding (000s)          
    End of period     1,401,335   1,197,401   716,087  
    Weighted average – Basic     1,273,892   1,170,310   715,861  
    Weighted average – Diluted     1,273,892   1,170,310   715,861  
    OPERATING          
    Production Volumes          
    Crude oil and condensate (bbl/d)     1,201   1,298   1,495  
    Natural gas (Mcf/d)     5,574   6,107   6,498  
    Natural gas liquids (bbl/d)     91   69   58  
    Total (boe/d)(3)     2,221   2,385   2,636  
    % Liquids     58 % 57 % 59 %
    Realized Prices          
    Crude oil and condensate ($/bbl)     86.88   83.16   80.75  
    Natural gas ($/Mcf)     2.43   1.49   2.64  
    Natural gas liquids ($/bbl)     56.53   53.93   85.21  
    Total ($/boe)(3)     55.39   50.65   54.17  
    Operating Netback ($/boe)          
    Realized price     55.39   50.65   54.17  
    Royalties     (7.37 ) (2.58 ) (7.80 )
    Operating costs(1)     (29.64 ) (30.02 ) (35.79 )
    Operating netback(2)     18.38   18.05   10.58  
    Realized gains (losses) on derivatives         (2.02 )
    Operating netback, after realized gains (losses) on derivatives(1)(2)     18.38   18.05   8.56  
    (1)   Restated. For further information, refer to the “Restatements” section in the MD&A.
    (2)   This is a Non-GAAP financial measure. For further information, refer to “Advisories – Non-GAAP and Other Financial Measures” below.
    (3)   The term barrels of oil equivalent (“boe”) may be misleading, particularly if used in isolation. Per boe amounts have been calculated by using the conversion ratio of six thousand cubic feet (6 Mcf) of natural gas to one barrel (1 bbl) of crude oil. Refer to “Advisories – Barrels of Oil Equivalent” below.
         

    ABOUT PRAIRIE PROVIDENT

    Prairie Provident is a Calgary-based company engaged in the development of oil and natural gas properties in Alberta. The Company’s strategy is to optimize cash flow from its existing assets to fund low-risk development and maintain stable cash flow while limiting its production decline.

    For further information, please contact:

    Dale Miller, Executive Chairman
    Phone: (403) 292-8150
    Email: investor@ppr.ca

    ADVISORIES

    Forward-Looking Statements

    This news release contains certain statements (“forward-looking statements”) that constitute forward- looking information within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities laws. Forward-looking statements relate to future performance, events or circumstances, are based upon internal assumptions, plans, intentions, expectations and beliefs, and are subject to risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results or events to differ materially from those indicated or suggested therein. All statements other than statements of current or historical fact constitute forward-looking statements. Forward- looking statements are typically, but not always, identified by words such as “anticipate”, “believe”, “expect”, “intend”, “plan”, “budget”, “forecast”, “target”, “estimate”, “propose”, “potential”, “project”, “continue”, “may”, “will”, “should” or similar words suggesting future outcomes or events or statements regarding an outlook.

    Without limiting the foregoing, this news release contains forward-looking statements pertaining to Basal Quartz drilling opportunities.

    Forward-looking statements are based on a number of material factors, expectations or assumptions of Prairie Provident which have been used to develop such statements, but which may prove to be incorrect. Although the Company believes that the expectations and assumptions reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, undue reliance should not be placed on forward-looking statements, which are inherently uncertain and depend upon the accuracy of such expectations and assumptions. Prairie Provident can give no assurance that the forward-looking statements contained herein will prove to be correct or that the expectations and assumptions upon which they are based will occur or be realized. Actual results or events will differ, and the differences may be material and adverse to the Company. In addition to other factors and assumptions which may be identified herein, assumptions have been made regarding, among other things: results from drilling and development activities; consistency with past operations; the quality of the reservoirs in which Prairie Provident operates and continued performance from existing wells (including with respect to production profile, decline rate and product type mix); the continued and timely development of infrastructure in areas of new production; the accuracy of the estimates of Prairie Provident’s reserves volumes; future commodity prices; future operating and other costs; future USD/CAD exchange rates; future interest rates; continued availability of external financing and internally generated cash flow to fund Prairie Provident’s current and future plans and expenditures, with external financing on acceptable terms; the impact of competition; the general stability of the economic and political environment in which Prairie Provident operates; the general continuance of current industry conditions; the timely receipt of any required regulatory approvals; the ability of Prairie Provident to obtain qualified staff, equipment and services in a timely and cost efficient manner; drilling results; the ability of the operator of the projects in which Prairie Provident has an interest in to operate the field in a safe, efficient and effective manner; field production rates and decline rates; the ability to replace and expand oil and natural gas reserves through acquisition, development and exploration; the timing and cost of pipeline, storage and facility construction and expansion and the ability of Prairie Provident to secure adequate product transportation; the regulatory framework regarding royalties, taxes and environmental matters in the jurisdictions in which Prairie Provident operates; and the ability of Prairie Provident to successfully market its oil and natural gas production.

    The forward-looking statements included in this news release are not guarantees of future performance or promises of future outcomes and should not be relied upon. Such statements, including the assumptions made in respect thereof, involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results or events to differ materially from those anticipated in such forward- looking statements including, without limitation: reduced access to external debt financing; higher interest costs or other restrictive terms of debt financing; changes in realized commodity prices; changes in the demand for or supply of Prairie Provident’s products; the early stage of development of some of the evaluated areas and zones; the potential for variation in the quality of the geologic formations targeted by Prairie Provident’s operations; unanticipated operating results or production declines; changes in tax or environmental laws, royalty rates or other regulatory matters; the imposition of new or additional tariffs or other restrictive trade measures or countermeasures affecting trade between Canada and the United States; changes in development plans of Prairie Provident or by third party operators; increased debt levels or debt service requirements; inaccurate estimation of Prairie Provident’s oil and reserves volumes; limited, unfavourable or a lack of access to capital markets; increased costs; a lack of adequate insurance coverage; the impact of competitors; and such other risks as may be detailed from time-to-time in Prairie Provident’s public disclosure documents (including, without limitation, those risks identified in this news release and Prairie Provident’s current Annual Information Form dated March 31, 2025 as filed with Canadian securities regulators and available from the SEDAR+ website (www.sedarplus.ca) under Prairie Provident’s issuer profile).

    The forward-looking statements contained in this news release speak only as of the date of this news release, and Prairie Provident assumes no obligation to publicly update or revise them to reflect new events or circumstances, or otherwise, except as may be required pursuant to applicable laws. All forward-looking statements contained in this news release are expressly qualified by this cautionary statement.

    Oil and Gas Reader Advisories

    Barrels of Oil Equivalent

    The oil and gas industry commonly expresses production volumes and reserves on a “barrel of oil equivalent” (“boe”) basis whereby natural gas volumes are converted at the ratio of six thousand cubic feet to one barrel of oil. The intention is to sum oil and natural gas measurement units into one basis for improved analysis of results and comparisons with other industry participants. A boe conversion ratio of six thousand cubic feet to one barrel of oil is based on an energy equivalency conversion method primarily applicable at the burner tip. It does not represent a value equivalency at the wellhead nor at the plant gate, which is where Prairie Provident sells its production volumes. Boes may therefore be a misleading measure, particularly if used in isolation. Given that the value ratio based on the current price of crude oil as compared to natural gas is significantly different from the energy equivalency ratio of 6:1, utilizing a 6:1 conversion ratio may be misleading as an indication of value.

    Potential Drilling Opportunities vs Booked Locations

    This news release refers to potential drilling opportunities and booked locations. Unless otherwise indicated, references to booked locations in this news release are references to proved drilling locations or probable drilling locations, being locations to which Trimble Engineering Associates Ltd. (Trimble), the Company’s independent qualified reserves evaluator, attributed proved or probable reserves in its most recent year-end evaluation of Prairie Provident’s reserves data, effective December 31, 2024. Trimble’s year-end evaluation was in accordance with National Instrument 51-101 Standards of Disclosure for Oil and Gas Activities and, pursuant thereto, the Canadian Oil and Gas Evaluation (COGE) Handbook. References in this news release to potential drilling opportunities are references to locations for which there are no attributed reserves or resources, but which the Company internally estimates can be drilled based on current land holdings, industry practice regarding well density, and internal review of geologic, geophysical, seismic, engineering, production and resource information. There is no certainty that the Company will drill any particular locations, or that drilling activity on any locations will result in additional reserves, resources or production. Locations on which Prairie Provident in fact drills wells will ultimately depend upon the availability of capital, regulatory approvals, seasonal restrictions, commodity prices, costs, actual drilling results, additional reservoir information and other factors. There is a higher level of risk associated with locations that are potential drilling opportunities and not booked locations. Prairie Provident generally has less information about reservoir characteristics associated with locations that are potential drilling opportunities and, accordingly, there is greater uncertainty whether wells will ultimately be drilled in such locations and, if drilled, whether they will result in additional reserves, resources or production.

    Initial Production Rates

    This news release discloses initial production (IP) rates for certain wells as indicated. Initial production rates are not necessarily indicative of long-term well or reservoir performance or of ultimate recovery. Actual results will differ from those realized during an initial short-term production period, and the difference may be material.

    Non-GAAP and Other Financial Measures

    This news release discloses certain financial measures that are ‘non-GAAP financial measures’, ‘non-GAAP ratios’ or ‘supplementary financial measures’ within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities laws. Such measures do not have a standardized or prescribed meaning under International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and, accordingly, may not be comparable to similar financial measures disclosed by other issuers. Non-GAAP and other financial measures are provided as supplementary information by which readers may wish to consider the Company’s performance but should not be relied upon for comparative or investment purposes. Readers must not consider Non-GAAP and other financial measures in isolation or as a substitute for analysis of the Company’s financial results as reported under IFRS. For a reconciliation of each non-GAAP measure to its nearest IFRS measure, please refer to the “Non-GAAP and Other Financial Measures” section of the MD&A.

    This news release also includes reference to certain metrics commonly used in the oil and gas industry but which do not have a standardized or prescribed meanings under the Canadian Oil and Gas Evaluation (COGE) Handbook or applicable law. Such metrics are similarly provided as supplementary information by which readers may wish to consider the Company’s performance but should not be relied upon for comparative or investment purposes.

    Following is additional information on non-GAAP and other financial measures and oil and gas metrics used in this news release.

    Adjusted Funds Flow (“AFF”) – AFF is a Non-GAAP financial measure calculated based on net cash from operating activities before changes in non-cash working capital, transaction costs, restructuring costs and other non-recurring items. The Company believes that AFF provides a useful measure of the Company’s operational performance on a continuing basis by eliminating certain non-cash charges and charges that are non-recurring or discretionary. Management utilizes the measure to assess the Company’s ability to finance capital expenditures and debt repayments. AFF as presented is not intended to represent cash flow from operating activities, net earnings or other measures of financial performance calculated in accordance with IFRS. AFF per share is calculated based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding consistent with the calculation of earnings per share. AFF per share is a Non-GAAP ratio.

    Operating Netback – Operating netback is a Non-GAAP financial measure commonly used in the oil and gas industry, which the Company believes is a useful measure to assist management and investors to evaluate operating performance. Operating netback included in this report were determined by taking oil and gas revenues less royalties and operating costs. Operating netback, after realized gains (losses) on derivatives, adjusts the operating netback for only the realized portion of gains and losses on derivatives. Operating netback may be expressed in absolute dollar terms or on a per boe basis. Per boe amounts are determined by dividing the absolute value by working interest production. Operating netback per boe and operating netback, after realized gains (losses) on derivatives per boe are Non-GAAP financial ratios.

    Capital Expenditures and Net Capital Expenditures – Capital expenditures and net capital expenditures are Non-GAAP financial measures commonly used in the petroleum and natural gas industry, which the Company believes are useful measures to assist management and investors to assess Prairie Provident’s investment in its existing asset base. Capital expenditures is calculated as the sum of property and equipment expenditures and exploration and evaluation expenditures from the consolidated statements of cash flows that is most directly comparable to cash flows used in investing activities. Net capital expenditures is calculated as capital expenditures, plus acquisitions from business combinations, which is the outflow cash consideration paid to acquire oil and gas properties, less asset dispositions (net of acquisitions), which is the cash proceeds from the disposition of producing properties and undeveloped lands.

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI Australia: ATO warns against websites sharing fake news on superannuation preservation age

    Source: New places to play in Gungahlin

    The Australian Taxation Office (ATO) is warning the community about a proliferation of dodgy websites sharing fake news about changes to the superannuation preservation rules and withdrawal rules starting on 1 June.

    ATO Deputy Commissioner Emma Rosenzweig confirmed the maximum preservation age (the age when you can access your superannuation savings on retirement) is 60 for anyone born from 1 July 1964.

    Taxpayers who have questions about the legitimacy of tax information should refer to the ATO’s website or speak to their registered tax professional if they have one.

    Quotes attributable to ATO Deputy Commissioner Emma Rosenzweig:

    ‘This is classic fake news. Always consider the source of information you see, and if in doubt go to trusted sources such as the ATO website www.ato.gov.au, your super fund website, your registered tax agent or licensed financial adviser.’

    ‘Beware of websites that might be trying to harvest your personal information such as your TFN, identity details or myGov login details.’

    ‘Think twice before acting on information heard from third-party sources, including non-official websites or on social media.’

    ‘Be cautious about ‘free expert’ tax advice. If you are going to approach someone to help you manage your tax affairs, ensure they are a practising lawyer or registered with the Tax Practitioners Board. You can check if a tax professional is registered on the Tax Practitioner’s Board websiteExternal Link.’

    Notes to journalists

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Sen. Cramer: FAA Announces $5.8 Million for Projects at North Dakota Airports

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator Kevin Cramer (R-ND)

    WASHINGTON, D.C. – The U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) announced an award of$5,844,554 through the Airport Infrastructure Grant (AIG) program for projects at several airports across North Dakota. The funding will be distributed to the following:

    • $2,491,667 for the Bismarck Municipal Airport to expand the existing General Aviation Apron by adding 5,340 square yards to meet FAA standards and to reconstruct 8,090 square yards of the existing General Aviation Apron pavement.
    • $2,200,000 to the Jamestown Regional Airport Authority to expand an existing 9,450 square foot snow removal equipment and sand storage building by 1,500 square feet to bring the airport into conformity with current standards.
    • $552,962 to the Mercer County Regional Airport Authority to reseal 1,420 feet of the existing Taxiway A and B pavement and joints, reseal 13,708 square yards of the existing North and South Apron pavement and joints, and reseal 5,000 feet of existing Runway 15/33 pavement and joints, and reseal 530 feet of the existing Taxilane pavement and joints.
    • $171,000 to the Bottineau Municipal Airport Authority to rehabilitate one existing airport rotating beacon.
    • $137,000 to the Mandan Airport Authority to construct new airport underdrains for drainage and erosion control.
    • $120,000 to the Crosby Municipal Airport Authority to construct a new 4,800 square foot sponsor-owned hangar for aircraft storage and maintenance which will assist the airport in being self-sustaining.
    • $86,925 to the Glen Ullin Regional Airport Authority to reseal 2,985 square yards of the existing General Aviation Apron pavement and joints, to reseal 3,800 feet of existing Runway 11/29 pavement and joints, to reseal 488 feet of the existing Taxilane East, West, and South pavement and joints, and to reseal 550 feet of the existing Taxiway A pavement and joints.
    • $85,000 to the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe to rehabilitate 3,700 feet of existing paved Runway 14/32 to maintain the structural integrity and minimize foreign object debris, rehabilitate 4,700 square yards of the existing General Aviation Apron pavement to maintain the structural integrity of the pavement and to minimize foreign object debris, and rehabilitate 550 feet of the existing paved Taxiway A to maintain the structural integrity of the pavement and to minimize foreign object debris.

    The AIG Program was established by the fully-paid-for Bipartisan Infrastructure Law to provide airports with funding for modernization and safety projects. Since its creation, airports in North Dakota have received over $49 million in program funding.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI China: Canadian PM Carney unveils new cabinet

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney unveiled on Tuesday a new cabinet.

    The new cabinet, Carney’s second but his first since being elected, includes a core group of 28 ministers and 10 secretaries of state.

    Anita Anand replaced Mélanie Joly as Minister of Foreign Affairs. Joly became Industry Minister.

    Dominic LeBlanc’s new title is president of the King’s Privy Council for Canada and minister responsible for Canada-U.S. Trade, intergovernmental affairs and one Canadian economy.

    François-Philippe Champagne remains Finance Minister and took on the additional role of Revenue Minister.

    Carney’s Liberal Party won the parliamentary elections in Canada last month to form a minority government. The House of Commons’ sitting calendar currently has May 26 listed as the first sitting date for MPs. 

    MIL OSI China News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Senate and House Republicans Make Strides to Repeal Over a Dozen Biden-Era Regulations to Advance Trump’s America First Agenda

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Kansas Roger Marshall

    Washington – In a seismic victory for President Trump’s America First Agenda, U.S. Senator Roger Marshall, M.D. (R-Kansas) today released the following statement on Senate and House Republicans’ efforts to reverse over a dozen of Joe Biden’s nonsensical regulations using the Congressional Review Act (CRA) – a legislative tool allowing Congress to strike down federal rules and regulations with a simple majority vote.
    “While the Biden-Harris administration tried to suffocate our nation’s businesses and families with nonsensical regulation after regulation, Senate and House Republicans are tearing down these barriers to unleash American prosperity,” said Senator Marshall. “I am committed to continue working with my colleagues to ensure these CRAs allow us to boldly deliver on President Trump’s promises.”
    Among the 13 burdensome Biden-Harris-era regulations that were targeted, Senate Republicans have slashed red tape to unleash American energy, end costly green new scam mandates, strengthen digital finance, and expand personal freedoms. These actions deliver on President Donald Trump’s America First agenda by reducing consumer costs, protecting privacy, and empowering businesses.
    Promise Made: Unleash American Energy
    Promise Kept:

    S.J.Res. 11 – Offshore Oil and Gas Drilling

    What It Does: This resolution overturns a Biden-era rule that prevented offshore oil and gas drilling because of the presence of “shipwrecks and cultural resources.” 
    Why It Matters: By overturning this regulation, we can unleash American energy through expanded production capacity off American shores.
    Status: Passed and became law on March 14, 2025.

    S.J.Res. 31 – Tailpipe Emissions and Area Pollution

    What It Does: This resolution overturns a Biden-era rule that requires sources of persistent and bioaccumulative hazardous air pollutants to comply with certain major source emission standards under the Clean Air Act.
    Why It Matters: By eliminating it, we’re lessening regulations and letting American industry flourish without the heavy and misguided hand of activist government bureaucrats holding it back.
    Status: Passed the Senate but has not yet passed the House.

    Promise Made: End the Green New Scam
    Promise Kept:

    H.J.Res. 24 – Walk-in Coolers and Freezers

    What It Does: This resolution overturns a Biden-era regulation that defines “walk-in coolers” and “walk-in freezers” as refrigerated spaces smaller than 3,000 square feet, which would have increased costs and regulations on manufacturers and restaurants.
    Status: Passed, but not yet signed by the President.

    H.J.Res. 42 –Appliance Energy Efficiency

    What It Does: This resolution overturns a Biden-era Department of Energy (DOE) rule that would have increased the cost of basic appliances.
    Status: Passed, but not yet signed by the President.

    H.J.Res. 75 –Energy Standards for Freezers and Refrigerators

    What It Does: This resolution overturns a Biden-era DOE rule that attempts to amend energy conservation standards for refrigerators, refrigerator-freezers, and freezers, that would have increased the cost of basic appliances. It would also have put financial constraints on any business that uses these appliances, such as restaurants, grocers, and more.
    Status: Passed, but not yet signed by the President.

    H.J.Res. 20 – Gas Powered Water Heaters

    What It Does: This resolution overturns a Biden-era rule that would have placed restrictions and regulations on gas-powered water heaters, which would have resulted in increased costs of tankless water heaters and reduced choice in the market.
    Status: Passed, but not yet signed by the President.

    H.J.Res. 35 – Waste Emissions Tax for Energy Producers

    What It Does: This resolution overturns a Biden-era Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) rule that implemented a Methane Tax on American energy producers, which would have resulted in higher costs passed onto consumers.
    Status: Passed and became law on March 14, 2025.

    H.J.Res. 61 – Rubber Tire Manufacturer Emissions

    What It Does: This resolution overturns a Biden-era EPA rule that attempted to add emissions standards to rubber tire manufacturing, including them in the hazardous air pollutant (HAP) regulation requirements, which would have resulted in higher costs passed onto consumers.
    Status: Passed, but not yet signed by the President.

    Why They Matter: By passing resolutions to overturn these six specific rules, we’re preventing increased costs from being invariably be passed onto consumers, removing burdensome regulations that could harm businesses large and small, and allowing American families to have more choice in the market and keep more of their hard-earned money.

    Promise Made: Strengthen U.S. Leadership in Digital Finance
    Promise Kept:

    S.J.Res. 3 / H.J.Res. 25 –Crypto IRS Reporting Requirements

    What It Does: This resolution overturns a Biden-era rule that mandates that brokers submit information returns and provide payee statements detailing the gross proceeds from digital asset transactions they carry out for their clients.
    Why It Matters: With the elimination of this rule, the private financial information of American citizens is further protected. 
    Status: Passed and became law on April 10, 2025.

    S.J.Res. 18 – Overdraft Fee Regulations

    What It Does: This resolution overturns an overreaching Biden-era Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) rule that limited overdraft fees.
    Why It Matters: Overturning this ensures that banks and financial institutions can negotiate their own relationships with customers with limited government interference. 
    Status: Passed and became law on April 10, 2025.

    S.J.Res. 28 – Digital Payment Providers

    What It Does: This resolution overturns a burdensome and overreaching Biden-era CFPB rule that would have threatened Americans’ privacy interests.
    Why It Matters: The rule, if left intact, could stifle innovation and impose undue burdens on digital payment providers like Venmo or PayPal. 
    Status: Passed, but not yet signed by the President.

    S.J.Res. 13 –Bank Merger Application Review

    What It Does: This resolution overturns a Biden-era rule from the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) that would have made more stringent the government’s review of bank mergers.
    Why It Matters: Overturning this rule will allow American financial institutions to make decisions that work best for their customers. 
    Status: Passed the Senate but has not yet passed the House.

    Promise Made: Eliminate Burdensome Regulations
    Promise Kept:

    H.J.Res. 60 – Regulations for ATV Usage

    What It Does: This resolution will make minor changes to a Biden-era regulation that will result in improved management of motorized uses in the Orange Cliffs Special Management Unit, including:

    Prohibiting the use of ORVs and street-legal ATVs on an 8-mile segment of the Poison Spring Loop located on Route 633 proceeding north to Route 730.
    Eliminating the superintendent’s authority to potentially allow ORVs and street-legal ATVs on the upper portion of the Flint Trail.

    Why It Matters: By improving this regulation, we will give Americans greater freedom to traverse the great outdoors, without the government needlessly telling them how to do it. 
    Status: Passed, but not yet signed by the President.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Congressman Brecheen and Congressman Roy Introduce Energy Freedom Act to End Biden’s Trillion-Dollar “Green New Deal” Tax Subsidies with Senator Mike Lee

    Source: US Congressman Josh Brecheen (2nd District)

    Congressman Brecheen and Congressman Roy Introduce Energy Freedom Act to End Biden’s Trillion-Dollar “Green New Deal” Tax Subsidies with Senator Mike Lee

    Washington, May 13, 2025

    Washington, D.C. – Congressman Josh Brecheen and Congressman Chip Roy introduced the Energy Freedom Act. This legislation would repeal the more than 20 green energy tax subsidies created or expanded by the Biden Administration’s Inflation Reduction Act (IRA). Senator Mike Lee is currently leading companion legislation in the Senate.

    Washington, D.C. – Congressman Josh Brecheen and Congressman Chip Roy introduced the Energy Freedom Act. This legislation would repeal the more than 20 green energy tax subsidies created or expanded by the Biden Administration’s Inflation Reduction Act (IRA). Senator Mike Lee is currently leading companion legislation in the Senate.

    “The Democrats’ so-called ‘Inflation Reduction Act’, signed into law in 2022, is nothing more than a massive, taxpayer-funded gift to green energy lobbyists and their leftist billionaire employers,” said Congressman Josh Brecheen. “Families in Oklahoma should not have to subsidize unreliable energy that makes their electricity bills more expensive and inflates other costs. By repealing these costly and reckless green energy subsidies, the Energy Freedom Act also brings us back to an energy policy that puts American workers first, and stops enriching battery and solar industries in China.”

    Background:

    Since its enactment in 2022, the IRA has enacted or expanded the Biden Administration’s green energy tax credits, projected to cost taxpayers between $825 billion (CBO) and over $1 trillion in the next decade (Goldman Sachs), and up to $4.7 trillion by 2050 (CATO). These subsidies entice utilities to overbuild unreliable sources of energy, driving up costs and undermining grid stability.

    The Energy Freedom Act would:

    • Eliminate more than 20 green energy tax credits created or expanded by the IRA for tax years beginning after December 31, 2025.

    • Save American taxpayers hundreds of billions of dollars over the next decade.

    • Repeal the Inflation Reduction Act’s petroleum tax.

    • Protect grid reliability and lower consumer energy costs by creating a level playing field for all energy sources.

    • Close loopholes that allow entities to monetize green energy subsidies.

    What will happen if we don’t repeal these green energy subsidies?

    • Wind and solar will displace natural gas on the electric grid. In 2024 alone, solar represented 61% of all new electricity generation in our nation, with more expected this year according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration.

    • The stability and independence of our electric grid will be put in jeopardy. By the end of this year, wind generation in the U.S. is expected to increase 11% from 2023 because of these green energy subsidies.

    • American jobs and economic growth will be outsourced to China. As of mid-2023, China produced 97 percent of the world’s solar panel silicon wafers.

    • Estimates project the Inflation Reduction Act will cost between $825 billion—according to the Congressional Budget Office as of January 2025—and over $1 trillion, per analysts at Goldman Sachs, over the next decade.

    Representatives Harriet Hageman (R-WY), Scott Perry (R-PA), Warren Davidson (R-OH), Eli Crane (R-AZ), and Barry Moore (R-AL) are the original cosponsors.

    Daily Caller wrote an exclusive story on the bill, which you can read here.

    Read the full text of this legislation here.

    Press Inquiries: darren.dershem@mail.house.gov

    ###

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI: Peyto Reports First Quarter 2025 Results

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    CALGARY, Alberta, May 13, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Peyto Exploration & Development Corp. (TSX: PEY) (“Peyto” or the “Company”) is pleased to report operating and financial results for the first quarter of 2025.

    Q1 2025 Highlights:

    • Peyto reported $225.2 million in funds from operations1,2 (“FFO”), or $1.12/diluted share, and generated $120.2 million of free funds flow3 in the quarter.  Strong FFO was driven by a realized natural gas price after hedging of $4.17/Mcf, 89% higher than the AECO 7A monthly benchmark, and the Company’s industry-leading low cash costs4.      
    • Earnings for the quarter totaled $114.1 million, or $0.57/diluted share, and Peyto returned $65.7 million as dividends to shareholders.
    • Net debt5 was reduced by $65.7 million from December 31, 2024 to $1.28 billion at the end of the quarter.
    • First quarter production volumes averaged 133,883 boe/d (710.5 MMcf/d of natural gas, 15,473 bbls/d of NGLs), a 7% increase year over year (5% on a per share basis), driven by strong well results from the Company’s capital program.
    • Recorded $50.8 million in realized hedging gains and exited the quarter with a hedge position protecting approximately 489 MMcf/d and 406 MMcf/d of natural gas production for Q2–Q4 2025 and 2026, respectively, at approximately $4/Mcf. Peyto’s natural gas and liquid hedging has secured approximately $875 million of revenue for 2025 and $605 million for 2026.
    • Cash costs totaled $1.42/Mcfe for the quarter, including royalties of $0.25/Mcfe, operating expense of $0.53/Mcfe, transportation of $0.29/Mcfe, G&A of $0.06/Mcfe and interest expense of $0.29/Mcfe. Peyto continues to have the lowest cash costs of Canadian producers in the oil and natural gas industry.
    • Total capital expenditures6 of $102.1 million in the quarter.  Peyto drilled 19 wells (18.2 net), completed 13 wells (13.0 net), and brought 14 wells (14.0 net) on production.    
    • Peyto delivered a solid operating margin7 of 71% and profit margin8 of 32%, resulting in a 10% return on capital employed9 (“ROCE”) and an 11% return on equity9 (“ROE”), on a trailing 12-month basis.        

    First Quarter 2025 in Review

    Peyto was active in the quarter with four drilling rigs in the Greater Sundance and Brazeau areas, as well as with pipeline and compression projects that expanded the existing gathering systems to accommodate incremental production volumes.  Natural gas prices recovered in the quarter due to large draws on storage inventories from a relatively cold North American winter, coupled with increased U.S. LNG feed gas demand.  The AECO 7A monthly gas price rose 39% from Q4 2024 and averaged $1.92/GJ.  Peyto’s realized gas price, before hedging, averaged $3.34/Mcf ($2.90/GJ), 51% higher than AECO 7A, driven by the Company’s diversification to premium demand markets in the US and Canada. Additionally, the Company recorded $0.83/Mcf of realized hedging gains on its gas volumes in the quarter from its mechanistic risk management strategy.  All in, Peyto’s realized gas price after hedging totaled $4.17/Mcf or 89% higher than AECO 7A monthly price.  The increased realized gas price, combined with Peyto’s low cost structure, boosted FFO by 13% from Q4 2024 to $225.2 million, which funded $102.1 million of capital expenditures, $65.7 million of shareholder dividends and allowed for a $65.7 million reduction in net debt in the quarter. 

    _________________________________________________

    1This press release contains certain non-GAAP and other financial measures to analyze financial performance, financial position, and cash flow including, but not limited to “operating margin”, “profit margin”, “return on capital”, “return on equity”, “netback”, “funds from operations”, “free funds flow”, “total cash costs”, and “net debt”. These non-GAAP and other financial measures do not have any standardized meaning prescribed under IFRS and therefore may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other entities. The non-GAAP and other financial measures should not be considered to be more meaningful than GAAP measures which are determined in accordance with IFRS, such as earnings, cash flow from operating activities, and cash flow used in investing activities, as indicators of Peyto’s performance. See “Non-GAAP and Other Financial Measures” included at the end of this press release and in Peyto’s most recently filed MD&A for an explanation of these financial measures and reconciliation to the most directly comparable financial measure under IFRS.
    2Funds from operations is a non-GAAP financial measure. See “non-GAAP and Other Financial Measures” in this news release and in the Q1 2025 MD&A.
    3Free funds flow is a non-GAAP financial measure. See “non-GAAP and Other Financial Measures” in this news release and in the Q1 2025 MD&A.
    4Cash costs is a non-GAAP financial measure. See “non-GAAP and Other Financial Measures” in this news release.
    5Net debt a non-GAAP financial measure. See “non-GAAP and Other Financial Measures” in this news release and in the Q1 2025 MD&A.
    6Total capital expenditures is a non-GAAP financial measure. See “non-GAAP and Other Financial Measures” in this news release and in the Q1 2025 MD&A.
    7Operating Margin is a non-GAAP financial ratio. See “non-GAAP and Other Financial Measures” in this news release.
    8Profit Margin is a non-GAAP financial ratio. See “non-GAAP and Other Financial Measures” in this news release.
    9Return on capital employed and return on equity are non-GAAP financial ratios. See “non-GAAP and Other Financial Measures” in this news release.

      Three Months Ended Mar 31 %
      2025 2024 Change
    Operations      
    Production      
    Natural gas (Mcf/d) 710,459 647,234 10%
    NGLs (bbl/d) 15,473 17,145 -10%
    Thousand cubic feet equivalent (Mcfe/d @ 1:6) 803,299 750,105 7%
    Barrels of oil equivalent (boe/d @ 6:1) 133,883 125,018 7%
    Production per million common shares (boe/d) 673 643 5%
    Product prices      
    Realized natural gas price – after hedging and diversification ($/Mcf) 4.17 4.05 3%
    Realized NGL price – after hedging ($/bbl) 62.97 60.36 4%
    Net sales price(2) ($/Mcfe) 4.90 4.87 1%
    Royalties ($/Mcfe) 0.25 0.24 4%
    Operating ($/Mcfe) 0.53 0.55 -4%
    Transportation ($/Mcfe) 0.29 0.30 -3%
    Field netback(1) ($/Mcfe) 3.88 3.82 2%
    General & administrative expenses ($/Mcfe) 0.06 0.06 0%
    Interest expense ($/Mcfe) 0.29 0.36 -19%
    Financial ($000, except per share)      
    Natural gas and NGL sales including realized hedging gains(2) 354,268 332,541 7%
    Funds from operations(1) 225,218 204,622 10%
    Funds from operations per share – basic(1) 1.13 1.05 8%
    Funds from operations per share – diluted(1) 1.12 1.05 7%
    Total dividends 65,676 64,158 2%
    Total dividends per share 0.33 0.33 0%
    Earnings 114,117 99,875 14%
    Earnings per share – basic 0.57 0.51 12%
    Earnings per share – diluted 0.57 0.51 12%
    Total capital expenditures(1) 102,129 113,762 -10%
    Decommissioning expenditures 2,872 4,206 -32%
    Total payout ratio(1) 76% 89% -15%
    Weighted average common shares outstanding – basic 199,017,749 194,416,710 2%
    Weighted average common shares outstanding – diluted 200,359,842 195,159,389 3%
           
    Net debt(1) 1,282,891 1,339,558 -4%
    Shareholders’ equity 2,593,128 2,683,990 -3%
    Total assets 5,356,226 5,373,202 0%
           

    (1) This is a Non-GAAP financial measure or ratio. See “non-GAAP and Other Financial Measures” in this news release and in the Q1 2025 MD&A
    (2) Excludes marketing revenue and other income

    Capital Expenditures

    Peyto drilled 19 gross (18.2 net) horizontal wells in the first quarter including 10 Wilrich, 1 Falher, 4 Notikewin, 3 Dunvegan, and 1 Cardium well in the core Brazeau and Sundance areas. The Company also completed 13 gross (13.0 net) wells and brought 14 gross (14.0 net) wells on production in the quarter resulting in total well-related capital expenditures of $85.6 million. Additionally, Peyto invested $15.5 million in gathering and processing facilities that included optimization projects and a pipeline to connect third-party volumes to Peyto’s Brazeau plant for long-term fee income. First quarter average drilling costs were slightly higher than the prior quarter, which was attributed to both cold weather operations and the execution of a uniquely over-pressured three-well pad in the Edson area. This was offset by lower completion costs, which fell 6% on a per-well basis from Q4 2024.

      2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2024
    Q1
    2024
    Q2
    2024
    Q3
    2024
    Q4
    2025 
    Q1(1)
    Gross Hz Spuds 135 70 61 64 95 95 72 75 18 20 21 16 19
    Measured Depth (m) 4,229 4,020 3,848 4,247 4,453 4,611 4891 5,092 5,220 5,364 4,804 4,987 4,976
                               
    Drilling ($MM/well) $1.90 $1.71 $1.62 $1.68 $1.89 $2.56 $2.85 $2.90 $3.05 $2.89 $2.81 $2.85 $3.01
    $ per meter $450 $425 $420 $396 $424 $555 $582 $569 $585 $539 $585 $572 $605
                               
    Completion ($MM/well) $1.00 $1.13 $1.01(2) $0.94 $1.00 $1.35 $1.54 $1.70 $1.80 $1.75 $1.56 $1.66 $1.56
    Hz Length (m) 1,241 1,348 1,484 1,682 1,612 1,661 1,969 2,184 2,223 2,350 2,224 1,989 1,961
    $ per Hz Length (m) $803 $751 $679 $560 $620 $813 $781 $776 $809 $744 $703 $834 $793
    $ ‘000 per Stage $81 $51 $38 $36 $37 $47 $52 $52 $55 $49 $48 $56 $56
                               

    (1) Based on field estimates and may be subject to minor adjustments going forward. 
    (2) Peyto’s Montney well is excluded from drilling and completion cost comparison.

    Peyto also spent $0.8 million during the quarter on acquiring mineral rights, seismic, and minor acquisitions.

    Commodity Prices and Realizations

    In the first quarter, Peyto realized a natural gas price after hedging and diversification of $4.17/Mcf, or $3.63/GJ, 89% higher than the average AECO 7A monthly benchmark of $1.92/GJ due to realized hedging gains and the Company’s market diversification to non-AECO hubs. Peyto’s natural gas hedging activity resulted in a realized gain of $0.83/Mcf ($53.0 million) in the quarter.

    Condensate and pentanes averaged $90.88/bbl for the quarter, down 1% year over year, while Canadian dollar WTI (“WTI CAD”) decreased 1% to $102.49/bbl over the same period. Other NGL volumes were sold at an average price of $32.41/bbl, or 32% of WTI CAD, up 3% from $31.37/bbl in Q1 2024. Peyto’s combined realized NGL price in the quarter was $64.56/bbl before hedging, and $62.97/bbl including a hedging loss of $1.59/bbl.

    Netbacks

    The Company’s realized natural gas and NGL sales yielded a combined revenue stream of $4.20/Mcfe before hedging gains of $0.70/Mcfe, resulting in a quarterly net sales price of $4.90/Mcfe, consistent with $4.87/Mcfe realized in Q1 2024. Cash costs totaled $1.42/Mcfe in the quarter, 6% lower than $1.51/Mcfe in Q1 2024 due to lower operating, transportation and interest costs. Operating costs are typically highest in the colder, first quarter and Peyto expects per-unit operating costs to trend downward throughout 2025. Peyto’s cash netback (net sales price including other income, net marketing revenue, realized gain on foreign exchange, less total cash costs) was $3.53/Mcfe, the highest since Q1 2023, driving a solid 71% operating margin. Historical cash costs and operating margins are shown in the following table:

      2022 2023 2024 2025
    ($/Mcfe) Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4(2) Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1
    Revenue(1) 5.25 5.48 5.01 5.74 5.10 4.07 4.32 4.83 4.92 3.97 3.99 4.34 4.95
    Royalties 0.60 0.95 0.70 0.72 0.53 0.18 0.29 0.30 0.24 0.26 0.18 0.21 0.25
                               
    Op Costs 0.41 0.39 0.38 0.41 0.50 0.47 0.44 0.55 0.55 0.52 0.54 0.50 0.53
    Transportation 0.28 0.27 0.26 0.22 0.24 0.29 0.29 0.26 0.30 0.30 0.31 0.27 0.29
    G&A 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.05 0.04 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.03 0.05 0.06
    Interest 0.21 0.20 0.21 0.21 0.22 0.22 0.28 0.40 0.36 0.36 0.38 0.33 0.29
    Cash cost pre-royalty 0.93 0.88 0.87 0.86 0.99 1.03 1.05 1.27 1.27 1.24 1.26 1.15 1.17
                               
    Total Cash Costs10 1.53 1.83 1.57 1.58 1.52 1.21 1.34 1.57 1.51 1.50 1.44 1.36 1.42
    Cash Netback11 3.72 3.65 3.44 4.16 3.58 2.86 2.98 3.26 3.41 2.47 2.55 2.98 3.53
    Operating Margin 71% 67% 69% 72% 71% 70% 69% 67% 69% 62% 64% 69% 71%
                               

    (1) Revenue includes other income, net marketing revenue and realized gains on foreign exchange.
    (2) First quarter of Repsol assets included in Peyto’s results

    Depletion, depreciation, and amortization charges of $1.34/Mcfe, along with provisions for current tax, deferred tax, performance-based compensation and stock-based compensation resulted in earnings of $1.58 /Mcfe, or a 32% profit margin. Dividends to shareholders totaled $0.91/Mcfe.

    Hedging and Marketing

    The Company has been active in hedging future production with financial and physical fixed price contracts to protect a portion of its future revenue from commodity price and foreign exchange volatility. The following table summarizes Peyto’s hedge position for Q2–Q4 2025, calendar 2026, and calendar 2027.

      Q2 2025 Q3 2025 Q4 2025 2026 2027
    Natural Gas          
    Volume (MMcf/d) 510 510 447 406 61
    Average Fixed Price(1)($/Mcf) 3.90 3.90 4.32 3.99 4.05
    WTI Swaps          
    Volume (bbls/d) 5,000 3,800 2,400 745
    Average Fixed Price ($/bbl) 98.94 95.51 93.14 86.19
    WTI Collars          
    Volume (bbls/d) 500 500 500 248
    Put–Call ($/bbl) 90.00–100.25 90.00–110.00 90.00–100.50 87.50–100.25
    Propane          
    Volume (bbls/d) 500 500 500 123
    Average Fixed Price (US$/bbl) 33.60 33.60 33.60 33.60
    USD FX Contracts          
    Amount sold (USD 000s) 69,000 63,000 47,000 112,500
    Rate (CAD/USD) 1.352 1.352 1.355 1.355

    (1) At 1.39 CAD/USD FX rate for USD contracts

    The Company’s fixed price contracts combined with its diversification to multiple hubs in North America allow for revenue security and support Peyto’s capital expenditure program, continued shareholder returns through dividends, and debt reduction.  Details of Peyto’s ongoing marketing and diversification efforts are available on Peyto’s website at https://www.peyto.com/Marketing.aspx.

    _________________________________________________

    10Total Cash costs is a non-GAAP financial ratio. See “non-GAAP and Other Financial Measures” in this news release.
    11Cash netback is a non-GAAP financial ratio. See “non-GAAP and Other Financial Measures” in this news release and in the Q1 2025 MD&A.

    Activity Update

    Since the start of the second quarter, Peyto has continued with an active drilling program across all core areas with 8 wells (6.7 net) drilled, 11 wells (9.4 net) completed, and 12 wells (12.0 net) brought on production. The Company intends to continue with a steady capital program through spring break-up and the rest of 2025.

    Last month, Peyto completed a third Falher well in Sundance, as a follow-up to the two wells that discovered a new channel last year. The results to date from these wells have demonstrated top decile internal rate of returns and the team has identified at least 20 additional locations on Peyto lands.  The Company plans to drill three more wells in the channel before the end of the year, which will help further delineate the trend and prove up productivity.

    Recently, the Company applied an alternate drilling technique and liner design on two low working-interest Cardium wells.  This technique, which targets drilling just below the Cardium sand, allowed Peyto to achieve significantly longer laterals while reducing per unit drill costs below historical levels in the area.  A cemented ball drop system allowed for the deployment of 60 stages in each well—a new record for Peyto.  Early results from these wells are encouraging and the Company plans to follow up with additional wells this year to further test the design.  With continued success, Peyto sees the opportunity to apply the new design to other Cardium inventory which comprises approximately 25% of the Company’s undrilled, booked reserves volumes.

    Beginning in April, Peyto commissioned a new pipeline to accept approximately 8 MMcf/d of natural gas from a third party at its Brazeau gas plant, relating to a multi-year gas processing agreement which utilizes spare capacity at the facility. This new pipeline also provides a future opportunity to serve other third-party volumes. 
      
    Outlook

    While the recent weakness in oil prices has a minimal effect on Peyto’s cash flow, it could be constructive to natural gas prices if the fall in oil prices lowers oil activity and associated gas production in the US. The Company remains bullish on forward natural gas prices with the recent start-up of US LNG export facilities and the ramp up of LNG Canada throughout 2025, combined with continued natural gas demand for AI driven data centres in North America. Further, Peyto is well-positioned with its hedge book and market diversification to provide shareholders with both revenue security and exposure to commodity price upside.  Over the next several years, the Company has significant volumes exposed to premium demand markets in the US and Canada, which offer a superior price above the current AECO market. 

    Despite the political volatility and global economic uncertainty, Peyto remains committed to its 2025 capital guidance of $450 to $500 million. The program is designed with flexibility in the back half of the year to adjust to changing commodity prices and the business environment. Peyto will manage production to minimize exposure to weaker priced markets, when necessary, while the Company’s systematic hedging and market diversification programs secure revenues to support future dividends and further strengthen the balance sheet.  

    Conference Call and Webcast

    A conference call will be held with senior management of Peyto to answer questions with respect to the Company’s Q1 2025 results on Wednesday, May 14, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. Mountain Time (MT), or 11:00 a.m. Eastern Time (ET).

    Access to the webcast can be found at: https://edge.media-server.com/mmc/p/svumnnnm To participate in the call, please register for the event at: Participant Call Link.  Participants will be issued a dial in number and PIN to join the conference call and ask questions. Alternatively, questions can be submitted prior to the call at info@peyto.com. The conference call will be available on the Peyto Exploration & Development website at www.peyto.com.

    Annual and Special Meeting

    Peyto’s Annual and Special Meeting of Shareholders is scheduled for 3:00 p.m. on Thursday, May 22, 2025, at the Eau Claire Tower, +15 level, 600 – 3rd Avenue SW, Calgary, Alberta. Shareholders are encouraged to read the Information Circular and vote in advance of the proxy voting deadline of Tuesday, May 20 at 3:00 p.m. (Calgary time) and attend this in-person meeting. Leading independent proxy advisory firms have recommended Peyto shareholders (“Shareholders”) vote “FOR” all the proposed resolutions.  Shareholders who have questions or need assistance with voting their shares should contact Peyto’s strategic advisor and proxy solicitation agent, Laurel Hill Advisory Group, by telephone at 1-877-452-7184 or by email at assistance@laurelhill.com. Shareholders who do not wish to attend are encouraged to visit the Peyto website at www.peyto.com where there is a wealth of information designed to inform and educate investors and where a copy of the AGM presentation will be posted. A monthly report from the President can also be found on the website which follows the progress of the capital program and the ensuing production growth.

    Management’s Discussion and Analysis

    A copy of the first quarter report to shareholders, including the MD&A, unaudited consolidated financial statements and related notes, is available at http://www.peyto.com/Files/Financials/2025/Q12025FS.pdf and at http://www.peyto.com/Files/Financials/2025/Q12025MDA.pdf and will be filed at SEDAR+, www.sedarplus.com at a later date.

    Jean-Paul Lachance                                                                                                                                           
    President & Chief Executive Officer                                                                                                                              
    May 13, 2025

    Phone:  (403) 261-6081
    Fax:      (403) 451-4100
    info@peyto.com

    Cautionary Statements

    Forward-Looking Statements

    This news release contains certain forward-looking statements or information (“forward-looking statements”) as defined by applicable securities laws that involve substantial known and unknown risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond Peyto’s control. These statements relate to future events or the Company’s future performance. All statements other than statements of historical fact may be forward-looking statements. The use of any of the words “plan”, “expect”, “prospective”, “project”, “intend”, “believe”, “should”, “anticipate”, “estimate”, or other similar words or statements that certain events “may” or “will” occur are intended to identify forward-looking statements. The projections, estimates and beliefs contained in such forward-looking statements are based on management’s estimates, opinions, and assumptions at the time the statements were made, including assumptions relating to: macro-economic conditions, including public health concerns and other geopolitical risks, the condition of the global economy and, specifically, the condition of the crude oil and natural gas industry, and the ongoing significant volatility in world markets; other industry conditions; changes in laws and regulations including, without limitation, the adoption of new environmental laws and regulations and changes in how they are interpreted and enforced; increased competition; the availability of qualified operating or management personnel; fluctuations in other commodity prices, foreign exchange or interest rates; stock market volatility and fluctuations in market valuations of companies with respect to announced transactions and the final valuations thereof; results of exploration and testing activities; and the ability to obtain required approvals and extensions from regulatory authorities. Management of the Company believes the expectations reflected in those forward-looking statements are reasonable, but no assurances can be given that any of the events anticipated by the forward-looking statements will transpire or occur, or if any of them do so, what benefits that Peyto will derive from them. As such, undue reliance should not be placed on forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements contained herein include, but are not limited to, statements regarding: management’s assessment of Peyto’s future plans and operations, including the 2025 capital expenditure program, drilling plans relating to the Falher discovery at Sundance and the additional wells planned using the alternate drilling technique in the Cardium; the expectation that per-unit operating costs will trend lower in 2025; the expectation that recent weakness in oil prices will have minimal effect on Peyto and could be constructive if lower oil activity decreases associated gas; LNG and AI data centres increasing natural gas demand and setting up a bullish price environment; the sustainability of the Company’s dividend; the effectiveness of the Company’s hedging program at securing revenue; the timing of Peyto’s annual general meeting; and the Company’s overall strategy and focus.

    The forward-looking statements contained herein are subject to numerous known and unknown risks and uncertainties that may cause Peyto’s actual financial results, performance or achievement in future periods to differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, these forward-looking statements, including but not limited to, risks associated with: continued changes and volatility in general global economic conditions including, without limitations, the economic conditions in North America and public health concerns; continued fluctuations and volatility in commodity prices, foreign exchange or interest rates; continued stock market volatility; imprecision of reserves estimates; competition from other industry participants; failure to secure required equipment; increased competition; the lack of availability of qualified operating or management personnel; environmental risks; changes in laws and regulations including, without limitation, the adoption of new environmental and tax laws, tariffs, and regulations and changes in how they are interpreted and enforced; the results of exploration and development drilling and related activities; and the ability to access sufficient capital from internal and external sources.  In addition, to the extent that any forward-looking statements presented herein constitutes future-oriented financial information or financial outlook, as defined by applicable securities legislation, such information has been approved by management of Peyto and has been presented to provide management’s expectations used for budgeting and planning purposes and for providing clarity with respect to Peyto’s strategic direction based on the assumptions presented herein and readers are cautioned that this information may not be appropriate for any other purpose.  Readers are encouraged to review the material risks discussed in Peyto’s latest annual information form under the heading “Risk Factors” and in Peyto’s annual management’s discussion and analysis under the heading “Risk Factors”.

    The Company cautions that the foregoing list of assumptions, risks and uncertainties is not exhaustive. Readers are cautioned that the assumptions used in the preparation of such information, although considered reasonable at the time of preparation, may prove to be imprecise and, as such, undue reliance should not be placed on forward-looking statements. Peyto’s actual results, performance or achievement could differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, these forward-looking statements and, accordingly, no assurance can be given that any of the events anticipated by the forward-looking statements will transpire or occur, or if any of them do so, what benefits Peyto will derive there from.  The forward-looking statements, including any future-oriented financial information or financial outlook, contained in this news release speak only as of the date hereof and Peyto does not assume any obligation to publicly update or revise them to reflect new information, future events or circumstances or otherwise, except as may be required pursuant to applicable securities laws.

    Barrels of Oil Equivalent

    To provide a single unit of production for analytical purposes, natural gas production and reserves volumes are converted mathematically to equivalent barrels of oil (BOE). Peyto uses the industry-accepted standard conversion of six thousand cubic feet of natural gas to one barrel of oil (6 Mcf = 1 bbl). The 6:1 BOE ratio is based on an energy equivalency conversion method primarily applicable at the burner tip. It does not represent a value equivalency at the wellhead and is not based on current prices. While the BOE ratio is useful for comparative measures and observing trends, it does not accurately reflect individual product values and might be misleading, particularly if used in isolation. As well, given that the value ratio, based on the current price of crude oil to natural gas, is significantly different from the 6:1 energy equivalency ratio, using a 6:1 conversion ratio may be misleading as an indication of value.

    Thousand Cubic Feet Equivalent (Mcfe)

    Natural gas volumes recorded in thousand cubic feet (mcf) are converted to barrels of oil equivalent (boe) using the ratio of six (6) thousand cubic feet to one (1) barrel of oil (bbl).  Natural gas liquids and oil volumes in barrel of oil (bbl) are converted to thousand cubic feet equivalent (Mcfe) using a ratio of one (1) barrel of oil to six (6) thousand cubic feet.  This could be misleading, particularly if used in isolation as it is based on an energy equivalency conversion method primarily applied at the burner tip and does not represent a value equivalency at the wellhead.

    Non-GAAP and Other Financial Measures

    Throughout this press release, Peyto employs certain measures to analyze financial performance, financial position, and cash flow. These non-GAAP and other financial measures do not have any standardized meaning prescribed under IFRS and therefore may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other entities. The non-GAAP and other financial measures should not be considered to be more meaningful than GAAP measures which are determined in accordance with IFRS, such as net income (loss), cash flow from operating activities, and cash flow used in investing activities, as indicators of Peyto’s performance.

    Non-GAAP Financial Measures

    Funds from Operations
    “Funds from operations” is a non-GAAP measure which represents cash flows from operating activities before changes in non-cash operating working capital, decommissioning expenditure, provision for performance-based compensation and transaction costs.  Management considers funds from operations and per share calculations of funds from operations to be key measures as they demonstrate the Company’s ability to generate the cash necessary to pay dividends, repay debt and make capital investments.  Management believes that by excluding the temporary impact of changes in non-cash operating working capital, funds from operations provides a useful measure of Peyto’s ability to generate cash that is not subject to short-term movements in operating working capital.  The most directly comparable GAAP measure is cash flows from operating activities.

      Three Months Ended March 31
    ($000) 2025 2024
    Cash flows from operating activities 219,116 196,829
    Change in non-cash working capital 730 3,587
    Decommissioning expenditures 2,872 4,206
    Performance-based compensation 2,500
    Funds from operations 225,218 204,622
         

    Free Funds Flow
    Peyto uses “free funds flow” as an indicator of the efficiency and liquidity of Peyto’s business, measuring its funds after capital investment available to manage debt levels, pay dividends, and return capital to shareholders through activities such as share repurchases. Peyto calculates free funds flow as cash flows from operating activities before changes in non-cash operating working capital, provision for performance-based compensation, and transaction costs, less total capital expenditures, allowing Management to monitor its free funds flow to inform its capital allocation decisions.  The most directly comparable GAAP measure to free funds flow is cash from operating activities. The following table details the calculation of free funds flow and the reconciliation from cash flow from operating activities to free funds flow.

      Three Months Ended March 31
    ($000) 2025 2024
    Cash flows from operating activities  219,116  196,829
    Change in non-cash working capital  730  3,587
    Performance-based compensation  2,500  –  
    Total capital expenditures  (102,129)  (113,762)
    Free funds flow  120,217  86,654
         

    Total Capital Expenditures
    Peyto uses the term “total capital expenditures” as a measure of capital investment in exploration and production activity, as well as property acquisitions and divestitures, and such spending is compared to the Company’s annual budgeted capital expenditures. The most directly comparable GAAP measure for total capital expenditures is cash flow used in investing activities. The following table details the calculation of cash flow used in investing activities to total capital expenditures.

       Three Months Ended March 31
      2025 2024
    Cash flows used in investing activities  103,321  97,634
    Change in prepaid capital  (431)  (4,653)
    Change in non-cash working capital relating to investing activities  (761)  20,781
    Total capital expenditures  102,129  113,762
         

    Net Debt
    “Net debt” is a non-GAAP financial measure that is the sum of long-term debt and working capital excluding the current financial derivative instruments, current portion of lease obligations and current portion of decommissioning provision.  It is used by management to analyze the financial position and leverage of the Company. Net debt is reconciled to long-term debt which is the most directly comparable GAAP measure.

    ($000) March 31, 2025 December 31, 2024 March 31, 2024
    Long-term debt 1,171,497 1,295,238 1,296,844
    Current assets (269,336) (394,517) (403,467)
    Current liabilities 361,267 269,609 260,380
    Financial derivative instruments – current 29,913 188,136 194,917
    Current portion of lease obligation (950) (936) (1,322)
    Decommissioning provision – current (9,500) (8,956) (7,794)
    Net debt 1,282,891 1,348,574 1,339,558
           

    Net marketing revenue
    Peyto uses the term “net marketing revenue” to evaluate the profitability of products purchased from third parties that are resold. Net marketing revenue is calculated as marketing revenue less marketing purchases. 

      Three Months Ended March 31
    ($000) 2025 2024
    Marketing revenue 8,342 25,851
    Marketing purchases (7,283) (26,238)
    Net marketing revenue 1,059 (387)
         

    Non-GAAP Financial Ratios

    Funds from Operations per Share
    Peyto presents funds from operations per share by dividing funds from operations by the Company’s diluted or basic weighted average common shares outstanding. “Funds from operations” is a non-GAAP financial measure. Management believes that funds from operations per share provides investors an indicator of funds generated from the business that could be allocated to each shareholder’s equity position.

    Netback per MCFE and BOE
    “Netback” is a non-GAAP measure that represents the profit margin associated with the production and sale of petroleum and natural gas.  Peyto computes “field netback per Mcfe” as commodity sales from production, plus net marketing revenue, if any, plus other income, less royalties, operating, and transportation expenses, divided by production.  “Cash netback” is calculated as “field netback” less interest, less general and administration expense and plus or minus realized gain on foreign exchange, divided by production.  “After-tax cash netback” is calculated as “cash netback” less current tax, divided by production. Netbacks are per-unit-of-production measures used to assess Peyto’s performance and efficiency. 

      Three Months Ended March 31 
    ($/Mcfe) 2025 2024
    Gross sale price 4.20 3.50
    Realized hedging gain 0.70 1.37
    Net sale price 4.90 4.87
    Net marketing revenue 0.02 (0.01)
    Other income 0.03 0.05
    Royalties (0.25) (0.24)
    Operating costs (0.53) (0.55)
    Transportation (0.29) (0.30)
    Field netback 3.88 3.82
    Net general and administrative (0.06) (0.06)
    Interest and financing (0.29) (0.36)
    Realized gain on foreign exchange 0.01
    Cash netback ($/Mcfe) 3.53 3.41
    Current tax ($/Mcfe) (0.41) (0.42)
    After-tax cash netback ($/Mcfe) 3.12 2.99
    After-tax cash netback ($/boe) 18.69 17.99
         

    Net marketing revenue per Mcfe
    “Net marketing revenue per Mcfe” is comprised of marketing revenue less marketing purchases, as determined in accordance with IFRS, divided by the Company’s total production.

    Total Payout Ratio
    “Total payout ratio” is a non-GAAP measure which is calculated as the sum of dividends declared plus total capital expenditures plus decommissioning expenditures, divided by funds from operations.  This ratio represents the percentage of the capital expenditures and dividends that is funded by cashflow.  Management uses this measure, among others, to assess the sustainability of Peyto’s dividend and capital program.

      Three Months Ended March 31
    ($000, except total payout ratio) 2025 2024
    Total dividends declared 65,676 64,158
    Total capital expenditures 102,129 113,762
    Decommissioning expenditures 2,872 4,206
    Total payout 170,677 182,126
    Funds from operations 225,218 204,622
    Total payout ratio (%) 76% 89%
         

    Operating Margin
    Operating Margin is a non-GAAP financial ratio defined as funds from operations, before current tax, divided by revenue before royalties but including realized hedging gains/losses other income and third-party sales net of purchases.

    Profit Margin
    Profit Margin is a non-GAAP financial ratio defined as net earnings divided by revenue before royalties but including realized hedging gains/losses, other income and third-party sales net of purchases.

    Cash Costs
    Cash costs is a non-GAAP financial ratio defined as the sum of royalties, operating expenses, transportation expenses, G&A and interest, on a per Mcfe basis.  Peyto uses total cash costs to assess operating margin and profit margin.

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI: Freehold Royalties Announces First Quarter 2025 Results

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    CALGARY, Alberta, May 13, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Freehold Royalties Ltd. (Freehold or the Company) (TSX:FRU) announces first quarter results for the period ended March 31, 2025.

    First Quarter 2025 Highlights

    • $91 million in revenue;
    • $68 million in funds from operations ($0.42/share) (1)(3);
    • $44 million in dividends paid ($0.27/share)(2);
    • 10,635 bbls/d of total liquids production, an 8% increase from previous quarter driven by continued execution of our U.S. expansion strategy and heavy oil growth in Canada;
    • 16,248 boe/d of total production, a 6% increase from previous quarter with a 65% weighting to oil and natural gas liquids (NGLs), an increase from 63% in Q1-2024;
    • Gross drilling of 322 wells, up 12% from Q4-2024;
    • Robust leasing with 25 new leases signed (14 in Canada; 11 in the U.S.) contributing $3.9 million in revenue with the U.S. contributing a record $3.3 million in lease bonus; and
    • $59.29/boe average realized price ($72.64/boe in the U.S. and $49.26/boe in Canada);
      • 47% pricing premium on Freehold’s U.S. production reflecting higher liquids weighting, higher quality crude oil and reduced transportation costs to get product to market.

    President’s Message

    Freehold’s Q1-2025 production of 16,248 boe/d is at the highest levels in our corporate history, in step with the high quality acquisition work completed in late 2024. The deliberate and strategic build out of our North American royalty portfolio has resulted in a balanced revenue base with Canada contributing 46% of revenue in Q1-2025 and the U.S. contributing 54%. On a volume basis the U.S. represented 43% of our production with premium pricing and higher liquids weighting driving an outsized revenue contribution. Our focus on acquiring mineral title interests in prospect rich basins has contributed to the record level of leasing this quarter in our core U.S. operating areas.

    Freehold’s oil weighted portfolio, underpinned by premium operators in select basins across North America, delivered significant value to the Company and our shareholders with $68 million of funds from operations(3) in the quarter, or $0.42/share. Included in our funds from operations was record leasing results with $3.9 million in revenue, including $3.3 million in U.S. leasing revenue. Notably, the majority of the U.S. leases signed in Q1-2025 are targeting the deeper Barnett formation of the Permian basin that is in the early stages of development.

    Liquids production increased 8% over Q4-2024 and 15% compared to Q1-2024. The increase is largely attributed to the December 2024 Midland basin acquisition and continued growth in our heavy oil portfolio which grew 7% over Q4-2024 and is up 19% compared to Q1-2024. Our U.S. portfolio continues to be led by consistent drilling activity by some of the highest quality payors in North America who are executing on their multi-year growth plans.

    We are maintaining our production guidance range of 15,800 boe/d to 17,000 boe/d for 2025E. The global macro environment has shifted since the end of the first quarter and how that may impact operator plans for the remainder of 2025 is unknown at this point. The industry is in excellent shape to manage commodity price volatility due to the capital discipline and prudent balance sheet management approach over the past number of years. Contributing to this is our positioning in the lowest break-even plays across North America under investment grade operators who take a long term, measured view to capital planning.

    David M. Spyker, President and Chief Executive Officer

    Dividend Announcement

    The board of directors of Freehold has declared a monthly dividend of $0.09 per share to be paid on June 16, 2025, to shareholders of record on May 30, 2025. The dividend is designated as an eligible dividend for Canadian income tax purposes.

    Operating and Financial Highlights

          Three Months Ended
    FINANCIAL ($ millions, except as noted) Q1-2025 Q4-2024 Q1-2024
    West Texas Intermediate (US$/bbl) 71.42   70.27   76.96  
    AECO 7A Monthly Index (Cdn$/Mcf) 2.02   1.46   2.07  
    Royalty and other revenue 91.1   76.9   74.3  
    Funds from operations (3) 68.1   61.3   54.4  
    Funds from operations per share, basic ($) (1)(3) 0.42   0.40   0.36  
    Dividends paid per share ($) (2) 0.27   0.27   0.27  
    Dividend payout ratio (%) (3) 65 % 66 % 75 %
    Long-term debt 294.3   300.9   223.6  
    Net debt (5)(6) 272.2   282.3   210.5  
    Net debt to trailing funds from operations (times) (5) 1.1x
      1.2x   0.9x  
    OPERATING        
    Total production (boe/d) (4) 16,248   15,306   14,714  
    Canadian production (boe/d)(4) 9,278   9,437   9,593  
    U.S. production (boe/d)(4) 6,970   5,869   5,121  
    Oil and NGL (%) 65 % 65 % 63 %
    Petroleum and natural gas realized price ($/boe) (4) 59.29   53.80   54.81  
    Cash costs ($/boe) (3)(4) 7.00   5.93   7.19  
    Netback ($/boe) (3) (4) 53.01   47.25   46.62  
    ROYALTY INTEREST DRILLING (gross / net)        
    Canada 92 / 3.9
      110 / 3.6   132 / 5.9  
    U.S. 230 / 0.8
      178 / 0.6   168 / 0.5  

    (1) Calculated based on the basic weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period
    (2) Based on the number of shares issued and outstanding at each record date
    (3) See Non-GAAP and Other Financial Measures
    (4) See Conversion of Natural Gas to Barrels of Oil Equivalent (boe)
    (5) Net debt and net debt to trailing funds from operations are capital management measures

    First Quarter Summary

    • Average production of 16,248 boe/d, an increase of 10% over the first quarter of 2024 with year-over-year liquids growth of 15% to 10,635 bbls/d:
      • Light and medium oil was up 13% over Q1-2024 to 6,880 bbls/d, largely due to the high quality, oil weighted U.S. acquisitions completed in 2024; and
      • Heavy oil was up 19% over Q1-2024 to 1,552 bbls/d as Mannville Stack and Clearwater production on Freehold’s lands hit record highs in the first quarter.
    • Royalty and other revenue totalled $91.1 million, up 18% over the prior quarter and 23% year-over-year. Other revenue included $3.9 million in lease bonus consideration and lease rental revenue, a quarterly record for Freehold.
    • Freehold’s corporate realized price was $59.29/boe, an increase of 9% compared to Q4-2024 and 8% from Q1-2024 due to higher commodity prices and higher weighting to liquids production.
    • Funds from operations totalled $68.1 million ($0.42 per share)(1).
    • Freehold closed $13.8 million of land purchases in the first quarter, including $11 million of high quality undeveloped mineral title lands in our core Midland and Delaware basin properties.
    • Dividends declared for Q1-2025 of $44.3 million ($0.27 per share). Freehold’s dividend payout ratio(1) was 65% for Q1-2025. Freehold’s dividend remains sustainable at oil and natural gas prices well below current commodity price levels.
    • Net debt(1)(2) of $272.2 million at the end of Q1-2025 was reduced by $10.1 million compared to year end 2024, representing 1.1 times trailing funds from operations(2) during the period. Freehold remains conservatively levered.

    (1) See Non-GAAP and Other Financial Measures
    (2) Net debt and net debt to trailing funds from operations are capital management measures

    Q1-2025 Drilling and Leasing Activity

    In total, 322 gross wells (4.7 net wells) were drilled on Freehold’s royalty lands in Q1-2025, a 12% increase (12% on a net basis) compared to the previous quarter. The increase in drilling reflects the expansion of the Company’s U.S. asset base and the positioning of our assets in areas across North America that continue to attract drilling capital.

    On a gross basis, essentially all drilling was oil focused. Approximately 29% of gross wells drilled in Q1-2025 were in Canada and 71% targeted Freehold’s U.S. royalty acreage.

      Three Months Ended
      Q1-2025 Q4-2024 Q1-2024
      Gross Net (1) Gross Net (1) Gross Net (1)
    Canada 92 3.9 110 3.6 132 5.9
    United States 230 0.8 178 0.6 168 0.5
    Total 322 4.7 288 4.2 300 6.4

    (1)  Equivalent net wells are aggregate of the numbers obtained by multiplying each gross well by our royalty interest percentage; U.S. wells on Freehold’s lands generally come on production at approximately 10 times the volume that of an average Canadian well in our portfolio.

    Canada

    Canadian net drilling was up over the previous quarter despite the decline on a gross basis as higher interest wells in the Viking and mineral title drilling in southeast Saskatchewan and the Mannville Stack made up a higher percentage. Q1-2025 drilling in Canada was led again by oil weighted plays including Viking (33 gross wells), southeast Saskatchewan (12 gross wells) and Mannville Stack (9 gross wells).

    During Q1-2025, Freehold entered into 14 new leases with seven counterparties totalling approximately $0.6 million in bonus and lease rental revenue. The majority of the new leasing was focused in southeast Saskatchewan and the Mannville Stack.

    U.S.

    During Q1-2025, 230 gross (0.8 net) wells were drilled on our U.S. lands, up 29% on a gross basis and 33% on a net basis from previous quarter due to a larger footprint in the Midland basin following the December 2024 acquisition and increased activity in the Eagle Ford basin. Approximately 90% of Q1-2025 drilling was focused in the Permian basin and 10% in the Eagle Ford basin.

    U.S. wells typically come on production at approximately ten times that of an average Canadian well in the Company’s portfolio, making equivalent net well additions much more valuable in the U.S. compared to Canada. However, a U.S. well can take upwards of six to twelve months on average from initial license to first production, compared to three to four months in Canada.

    In Q1-2025, Freehold entered into 11 new U.S. leases with four counterparties, totalling $3.3 million of bonus and lease rental revenue. Leasing activity was predominantly focused on Freehold’s mineral title interests in the Midland and Delaware basins with one lease in the Haynesville basin.

    Normal Course Issuer Bid (NCIB) Application

    The Company plans to implement an NCIB, pursuant to which Freehold would be permitted to acquire up to 10% of its issued and outstanding common shares that comprise the public float (less common shares held by directors, executive officers and principal securityholders (holders holding greater than 10% of the issued and outstanding Shares) of the Company), through the facilities, rules and regulations of the TSX.

    The NCIB will be subject to receipt of certain approvals, including acceptance of the notice of intention to commence an NCIB by the TSX. The NCIB will commence following receipt of all such approvals and will continue until the earlier of: (i) a period of up to one-year; or (ii) the date on which the Company has acquired all common shares sought pursuant to the NCIB. Further particulars of the NCIB will be described in a subsequent press release when approved by the TSX.

    Freehold believes establishing a NCIB as part of its capital management strategy is in the best interests of the Company and provides an opportunity to deliver value to shareholders. Decisions regarding utilizing the NCIB will be based on market conditions, share price, best use of funds from operations and other factors including debt repayment and options to expand our portfolio of royalty assets.

    Annual Meeting of Shareholders

    Freehold’s annual meeting of shareholders (the AGM) will be conducted in person and via live audio webcast at 3:00 PM (MDT) on Wednesday May 14, 2025 at the Calgary Petroleum Club. Further details are available on our website at https://freeholdroyalties.com/investors/events-and-presentations.

    Conference Call Details

    A webcast to discuss financial and operational results for the period ended March 31, 2025, will be held for the investment community on Wednesday May 14, 2025, beginning at 7:00 AM MT (9:00 AM ET).

    A live audio webcast will be accessible through the link below and on Freehold’s website under “Events & Presentations” on Freehold’s website at www.freeholdroyalties.com. To participate in the conference call, you can register using the following link: Live Audio Webcast URL: https://edge.media-server.com/mmc/p/6y39yhx4.

    A dial-in option is also available and can be accessed by dialing 1-800-952-5114 (toll-free in North America) participant passcode is 5153824#.

    For further information contact

    Freehold Royalties Ltd.
    Todd McBride, CPA, CMA                     
    Investor Relations                                 
    t. 403.221.0833                                      
    e. tmcbride@freeholdroyalties.com    
     Nick Thomson, CFA
    Investor Relations & Capital Markets
    t. 403.221.0874                                          
    e. nthomson@freeholdroyalties.com
    Select Quarterly Information
      2025   2024 2023  
    Financial ($millions, except as noted) Q1 Q4 Q3 Q2 Q1 Q4 Q3 Q2
    Royalty and other revenue 91.1   76.9   73.9   84.5   74.3   80.1   84.2   73.7  
    Net Income (loss) 37.3   51.1   25.0   39.3   34.0   34.3   42.3   24.3  
    Per share, basic ($) (1) 0.23   0.33   0.17   0.26   0.23   0.23   0.28   0.16  
    Cash flows from operations 62.9   59.1   64.1   47.6   52.5   70.7   53.7   49.9  
    Funds from operations 68.1   61.3   55.7   59.6   54.4   62.8   65.3   53.0  
    Per share, basic ($) (1)(3) 0.42   0.40   0.37   0.40   0.36   0.42   0.43   0.35  
    Acquisitions & related expenditures 13.9   277.0   1.8   11.5   121.5   2.1   1.2   3.2  
    Dividends paid 44.3   40.7   40.7   40.7   40.7   40.7   40.7   40.7  
    Per share ($) (2) 0.27   0.27   0.27   0.27   0.27   0.27   0.27   0.27  
    Dividends declared 44.3   41.9   40.7   40.7   40.7   40.7   40.7   40.7  
    Per share ($) (2) 0.27   0.27   0.27   0.27   0.27   0.27   0.27   0.27  
    Dividend payout ratio (%) (3) 65 % 66 % 73 % 68 % 75 % 65 % 62 % 77 %
    Long-term debt 294.3   300.9   205.8   228.0   223.6   123.0   141.2   152.0  
    Net debt (5) 272.2   282.3   187.1   199.1   210.5   100.9   113.4   136.9  
    Shares outstanding, period end (000s) 164.0   164.0   150.7   150.7   150.7   150.7   150.7   150.7  
    Average shares outstanding, basic (000s) (6) 164.0   153.4   150.7   150.7   150.7   150.7   150.7   150.7  
    Operating                
    Light and medium oil (bbl/d) 6,880   6,296   6,080   6,551   6,094   6,308   6,325   6,093  
    Heavy oil (bbl/d) 1,552   1,516   1,315   1,348   1,300   1,182   1,127   1,167  
    NGL (bbl/d) 2,203   2,066   1,972   1,902   1,884   1,878   1,678   1,845  
    Total liquids (bbl/d) 10,635   9,878   9,367   9,801   9,278   9,368   9,130   9,105  
    Natural gas (Mcf/d) 33,678   32,564   31,447   32,524   32,617   32,968   32,851   33,372  
    Total production (boe/d) (4) 16,248   15,306   14,608   15,221   14,714   14,863   14,605   14,667  
    Oil and NGL (%) 65 % 65 % 64 % 64 % 63 % 63 % 63 % 62 %
    Petroleum & natural gas realized price ($/boe) (4) 59.29   53.80   54.36   59.74   54.81   57.94   61.55   54.05  
    Cash costs ($/boe) (3)(4) 7.00   5.93   5.42   9.80   7.19   4.73   5.10   7.19  
    Netback ($/boe) (3)(4) 53.01   47.25   47.78   49.44   46.62   52.59   55.63   46.07  
    Benchmark Prices                
    West Texas Intermediate crude oil (US$/bbl) 71.42   70.27   75.09   80.57   76.96   78.32   82.26   73.78  
    Exchange rate (Cdn$/US$) 1.43   1.40   1.37   1.37   1.35   1.36   1.34   1.34  
    Edmonton Light Sweet crude oil (Cdn$/bbl) 95.32   94.90   97.85   105.29   92.14   99.69   107.89   94.97  
    Western Canadian Select crude oil (Cdn$/bbl) 84.30   80.75   83.95   91.63   77.77   76.96   93.05   78.76  
    Nymex natural gas (US$/Mcf) 3.79   2.86   2.24   1.96   2.33   2.98   2.64   2.17  
    AECO 7A Monthly Index (Cdn$/Mcf) 2.02   1.46   0.81   1.44   2.07   2.70   2.42   2.40  

    (1) Calculated based on the basic weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period
    (2) Based on the number of shares issued and outstanding at each record date
    (3) See Non-GAAP and Other Financial Measures
    (4) See Conversion of Natural Gas to Barrels of Oil Equivalent (boe)
    (5) The 2023 reported balances have been restated due to the retrospective adoption of IAS 1 (see note 3d of December 31, 2024 audited consolidated financial statements)
    (6) Weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period, basic

    Forward-Looking Statements

    This news release offers our assessment of Freehold’s future plans and operations as of March 12, 2025, and contains forward-looking statements that we believe allow readers to better understand our business and prospects. These forward-looking statements include our expectations for the following:

    • 2025 production guidance;
    • our expectation regarding continued growth of our total liquid production through continued execution of our U.S. expansion strategy and heavy oil growth in Canada;
    • our expectation that our U.S. portfolio will continue to be led by consistent drilling activity by the highest quality payors in North America who are executing on their multi-year growth plans;
    • our expectation that the industry is in excellent shape to manage commodity price volatility due to the capital discipline and prudent balance sheet management approach over the past number of years;
    • our expectation that while some growth directed capital may be pared down, there will not be a slow down in core activity on our lands;
    • our expectation Freehold’s dividend remains sustainable at oil and natural gas prices materially below current commodity price levels;
    • our expectation that the positioning of our assets in areas across North America will continue to attract drilling capital despite volatility in commodity prices;
    • our expectation that U.S. wells typically come on production at approximately ten times that of an average Canadian well in the Company’s portfolio, making net well additions much more valuable in the U.S. compared to Canada;
    • our expectations that a U.S. well can take upwards of six to twelve months on average from initial license to first production, compared to three to four months in Canada;
    • our expectations that we will apply for an commence a NCIB once approval is granted; and
    • other similar statements.

    By their nature, forward-looking statements are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, some of which are beyond our control, including general economic conditions, volatility in market prices for crude oil, NGL and natural gas, risks and impacts of tariffs (or other retaliatory trade measures) imposed by Canada or the U.S. (or other countries) on exports and/or imports into and out of such countries, inflation and supply chain issues, the impacts of the ongoing Israeli-Hamas-Hezbollah and potentially the broader Middle-East region, and Russia-Ukraine wars and any associated sanctions as well as OPEC+ curtailments on the global economy and commodity prices, geopolitical instability, political instability, industry conditions, volatility of commodity prices, future production levels, future capital expenditure levels, currency fluctuations, imprecision of reserve estimates, royalties, environmental risks, taxation, regulation, changes in tax or other legislation, competition from other industry participants, inaccurate assumptions on supply and demand factors affecting the consumption of crude oil, NGLs and natural gas, inaccurate expectations for industry drilling levels on our royalty lands, the failure to complete acquisitions on the timing and terms expected, the failure to satisfy conditions of closing for any acquisitions, the lack of availability of qualified personnel or management, stock market volatility, our inability to come to agreement with third parties on prospective opportunities and the results of any such agreement and our ability to access sufficient capital from internal and external sources. Risks are described in more detail in our Annual Information Form for the year-ended December 31, 2024, available at www.sedarplus.ca.

    With respect to forward-looking statements contained in this news release, we have made assumptions regarding, among other things, future commodity prices, future capital expenditure levels, future production levels, future exchange rates, future tax rates, future legislation, the cost of developing and producing our assets, the quality of our counterparties and the plans thereof, our ability and the ability of our lessees to obtain equipment in a timely manner to carry out development activities, our ability to market our oil and gas successfully to current and new customers, the performance of current wells and future wells drilled by our royalty payors, our expectation for the consumption of crude oil and natural gas, our expectation for industry drilling levels, our expectation for completion of wells drilled, our ability to obtain financing on acceptable terms, shut-in production, production additions from our audit function, our ability to execute on prospective opportunities and our ability to add production and reserves through development and acquisition activities. Additional operating assumptions with respect to the forward-looking statements referred to above are detailed in the body of this news release.

    You are cautioned that the assumptions used in the preparation of such information, although considered reasonable at the time of preparation, may prove to be imprecise and, as such, undue reliance should not be placed on forward-looking statements. Our actual results, performance, or achievement could differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, these forward-looking statements. We can give no assurance that any of the events anticipated will transpire or occur, or if any of them do, what benefits we will derive from them. The forward-looking information contained in this document is expressly qualified by this cautionary statement. To the extent any guidance or forward-looking statements herein constitute a financial outlook, they are included herein to provide readers with an understanding of management’s plans and assumptions for budgeting purposes and readers are cautioned that the information may not be appropriate for other purposes. Our policy for updating forward-looking statements is to update our key operating assumptions quarterly and, except as required by law, we do not undertake to update any other forward-looking statements.

    You are further cautioned that the preparation of financial statements in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), which are the Canadian generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for publicly accountable enterprises, requires management to make certain judgments and estimates that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses. These estimates may change, having either a positive or negative effect on net income, as further information becomes available and as the economic environment changes.

    To the extent any guidance or forward-looking statements herein constitutes a financial outlook, they are included herein to provide readers with an understanding of management’s plans and assumptions for budgeting purposes and readers are cautioned that the information may not be appropriate for other purposes. You are further cautioned that the preparation of financial statements in accordance with IFRS requires management to make certain judgments and estimates that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses. These estimates may change, having either a positive or negative effect on net income, as further information becomes available and as the economic environment changes.

    Conversion of Natural Gas to Barrels of Oil Equivalent (BOE)
    To provide a single unit of production for analytical purposes, natural gas production and reserves volumes are converted mathematically to equivalent barrels of oil (boe). We use the industry-accepted standard conversion of six thousand cubic feet of natural gas to one barrel of oil (6 Mcf = 1 bbl). The 6:1 boe ratio is based on an energy equivalency conversion method primarily applicable at the burner tip. It does not represent a value equivalency at the wellhead and is not based on either energy content or current prices. While the boe ratio is useful for comparative measures and observing trends, it does not accurately reflect individual product values and might be misleading, particularly if used in isolation. As well, given that the value ratio, based on the current price of crude oil to natural gas, is significantly different from the 6:1 energy equivalency ratio, using a 6:1 conversion ratio may be misleading as an indication of value.

    Non-GAAP and Other Financial Measures
    Within this news release, references are made to terms commonly used as key performance indicators in the oil and gas industry, which do not have any standardized means prescribed by Canadian generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). We believe that net revenue, netback, dividend payout ratio, funds from operations per share and cash costs are useful non-GAAP financial measures and ratios for management and investors to analyze operating performance, financial leverage, and liquidity, and we use these terms to facilitate the understanding and comparability of our results of operations. However, these as terms do not have any standardized meanings prescribed by GAAP, such terms may not be comparable with the calculations of similar measures for other entities. This news release also contains the capital management measures net debt and net debt to trailing funds from operations, as defined in note 14 to the unaudited consolidated financial statements as at and for the three months ended March 31, 2025.

    Net revenue, which is calculated as revenues less ad valorem and production taxes (as incurred in the U.S. at the state level, largely Texas, which do not charge corporate income taxes but do assess flat tax rates on commodity revenues in addition to property tax assessments) details the net amount Freehold receives from its royalty payors, largely after state withholdings.

    The netback, which is also calculated on a boe basis, as average realized price less production and ad valorem taxes, operating expenses, general and administrative expense, cash-based management fees, cash-based interest charges and share-based payouts, represents the per boe netback amount which allows us to benchmark how changes in commodity pricing, net of production and ad valorem taxes, and our cash-based cost structure compare against prior periods.

    Cash costs, which is calculated on a boe basis, is comprised by the recurring cash-based costs, excluding taxes, reported on the statements of operations. For Freehold, cash costs are identified as operating expense, general and administrative expense, cash-based interest charges, cash-based management fees and share-based compensation payouts. Cash costs allow Freehold to benchmark how changes in its manageable cash-based cost structure compare against prior periods.

    The following table presents the computation of Net Revenue, Cash costs and the Netback:

    $/boe Q1-2025 Q4-2024 Q1-2024
    Royalty and other revenue   62.29     54.59     55.47  
    Production and ad valorem taxes   (2.28)     (1.41)     (1.66)  
    Net revenue $60.01   $53.18   $53.81  
    Less:      
    General and administrative expense   (3.41)     (3.02)     (3.58)  
    Operating expense   (0.13)     (0.19)     (0.15)  
    Interest and financing cash expense   (3.31)     (2.67)     (2.79)  
    Management fee-cash settled   (0.05)     (0.05)     (0.06)  
    Cash payout on share-based compensation   (0.10)         (0.61)  
    Cash costs   (7.00)     (5.93)     (7.19)  
    Netback $53.01   $47.25   $46.62  

    Dividend payout ratios are often used for dividend paying companies in the oil and gas industry to identify dividend levels in relation to funds from operations that are also used to finance debt repayments and/or acquisition opportunities. Dividend payout ratio is a supplementary measure and is calculated as dividends paid as a percentage of funds from operations.

           
    ($000s, except as noted) Q1-2025 Q4-2024 Q1-2024
    Dividends paid $44,269   $40,687   $40,686  
    Funds from operations $68,050   $61,332   $54,362  
    Dividend payout ratio (%)   65%     66%     75%  

    Funds from operations per share, which is calculated as funds from operations divided by the weighted average shares outstanding during the period, provides direction if changes in commodity prices, cash costs, and/or acquisitions were accretive on a per share basis. Funds from operations per share is a supplementary measure.

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI USA: Burlison and Grothman Announce Hearing on the Inflation Reduction Act’s Harm to American Energy and Medicine

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Representative Eric Burlison (R-Missouri 7th District)

    WASHINGTON—Subcommittee on Economic Growth, Energy Policy, and Regulatory Affairs Chairman Eric Burlison (R-Mo.) and Subcommittee on Health Care and Financial Services Chairman Glenn Grothman (R-Wis.) announced a joint hearing on “Mandates, Meddling, and Mismanagement: The IRA’s Threat to Energy and Medicine.” This hearing will highlight how the Biden Administration used the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) as a tool to raise taxes on businesses, increase environmental spending, and imperil Medicare premiums. The IRA politicized spending to fund the partisan “Green New Deal” and subsidized the “green” energy purchases of wealthy households while the Biden Administration overlooked waste, fraud, and abuse in funding streams to left-wing groups. 

    “The IRA has wasted billions of taxpayer funds to advance the Democrats’ radical climate agenda and restrict Medicare plan choices for Americans who need it most. The IRA’s energy subsidies and Medicare premium hikes could now cost American taxpayers trillions over the next 10 years unless Congress takes action to stop it. This hearing will expose wasteful spending under the IRA and investigate the ways Congress can protect taxpayer dollars from being spent on misguided, partisan priorities,” said the lawmakers.   

    WHAT: Hearing on “Mandates, Meddling, and Mismanagement: The IRA’s Threat to Energy and Medicine” 

    DATE: May 20, 2025 

    TIME: 10:00 a.m. ET 

    LOCATION: HVC-210, U.S. Capitol Visitor Center 

    WITNESSES:

    • Mr. Ben Lieberman, Senior Fellow, Competitive Enterprise Institute
    • Dr. Erin Trish, Ph.D., Co-Director, USC Schaeffer Center and Associate Professor, Department of Pharmaceutical and Health Economics, USC Mann School of Pharmacy
    • Dr. William McBride, Ph.D., Chief Economist and Stephen J. Entin Fellow in Economics, Tax Foundation

    WATCH: The hearing will be livestreamed here.

      
    ###

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI: TWFG Announces First Quarter 2025 Results

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    THE WOODLANDS, Texas, May 13, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — – Total Revenues increased 16.6% for the quarter over the prior year period to $53.8 million
    – Total Written Premium increased 15.5% for the quarter over the prior year period to $371.0 million
    – Organic Revenue Growth Rate* of 14.3% for the quarter –
    – Net income of $6.9 million for the quarter
    – Adjusted EBITDA* increased 35.3% for the quarter over the prior year period to $12.2 million

    THE WOODLANDS, Texas, May 13, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) – TWFG, Inc. (“TWFG”, the “Company” or “we”) (NASDAQ: TWFG), a high-growth insurance distribution company, today announced results for the first quarter ended March 31, 2025.

    First Quarter 2025 Highlights

    • Total revenues for the quarter increased 16.6% to $53.8 million, compared to $46.1 million in the prior year period
    • Commission income for the quarter increased 14.7% to $48.8 million, compared to $42.5 million in the prior year period
    • Net income for the quarter was $6.9 million, compared to $6.6 million in the prior year period, and net income margin for the quarter was 12.7%
    • Diluted Earnings Per Share for the quarter was $0.09 and Adjusted Diluted Earnings Per Share* for the quarter was $0.16
    • Total Written Premium for the quarter increased 15.5% to $371.0 million, compared to $321.3 million in the prior year period
    • Organic Revenue Growth Rate* for the quarter was 14.3%
    • Adjusted Net Income* for the quarter increased 14.3% from the prior year period to $9.2 million, and Adjusted Net Income Margin* for the quarter was 17.1%
    • Adjusted EBITDA* for the quarter increased 35.3% over the prior year period to $12.2 million, and Adjusted EBITDA Margin* for the quarter was 22.6% compared to 19.5% in the prior year period

    *Organic Revenue Growth Rate, Adjusted Net Income, Adjusted Net Income Margin, Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA Margin, Adjusted Free Cash Flow and Adjusted Diluted Earnings Per Share are non-GAAP measures. Reconciliations of Organic Revenue Growth Rate to total revenue growth rate, Adjusted Net Income and Adjusted EBITDA to net income, Adjusted Diluted Earnings Per Share to diluted earnings per share, and Adjusted Free Cash Flow to cash flow from operating activities, the most directly comparable financial measures presented in accordance with GAAP, are outlined in the reconciliation table accompanying this release.

    Gordy Bunch, Founder, Chairman, and CEO said “Our strong first quarter performance reflects the continued execution of our strategy and strength of our business model. Total revenues grew 16.6% year-over-year, and Adjusted EBITDA increased by 35.3%, and Adjusted EBITDA Margin expansion grew to 22.6%. Organic Revenue Growth of 14.3% underscores the productivity of our agents and the enduring value we deliver to our carrier partners and clients.

    Our recruiting momentum remains robust as we continue to expand our national footprint. During the quarter, we completed the acquisition of two new corporate locations, one in Ohio and one in Texas, expanded into New Hampshire, and added 17 branches across the U.S. The new locations are in line with our acquisition expectations for both revenue and EBITDA.

    As a reminder to our shareholders, newly onboarded agents typically take two to three years to reach full productivity.”

    First Quarter 2025 Results

    Total Written Premium for the first quarter of 2025 was $371.0 million, representing an increase of 15.5% compared to the prior year period. Total revenues were $53.8 million, an increase of 16.6% year-over-year.

    Organic Revenue, a non-GAAP measure that excludes contingent income, non-policy fee income, and other income, was $49.2 million for the first quarter of 2025, compared to $41.6 million in the prior year period. Organic Revenue Growth Rate was 14.3%, driven by robust new business production, moderating retention levels, rate increases, and continued growth in new business activity within one of our managing general agency (MGA) programs.

    Commission expense for the quarter totaled $31.8 million, an increase of 20.3% compared to $26.4 million in the prior year period. This increase reflects the continued growth of our business, partially offset by the one-time favorable adjustment in prior year period due to the branch conversions.

    Salaries and employee benefits were $8.2 million, an increase of 31.1% compared to $6.3 million in the first quarter of 2025. The increase includes $1.2 million of equity compensation expense and $0.7 million related to increased headcount and overall business growth.

    Other administrative expenses were $4.7 million in the quarter, up 50.9% from the prior year period. The increase reflects investments to support business growth and the absorption of public company operating costs.

    Net income for the first quarter of 2025 was $6.9 million, compared to $6.6 million in the prior year period. Net income margin was 12.7%, compared to 14.4% a year ago. Adjusted Net Income was $9.2 million for the quarter, compared to $8.1 million in the same period last year. Adjusted Net Income Margin was 17.1%, versus 17.5% in the prior year period.

    Adjusted EBITDA was $12.2 million for the first quarter, an increase of 35.3% year-over-year. Adjusted EBITDA Margin expanded to 22.6%, compared to 19.5% in the first quarter of 2024.

    Cash flow from operating activities was $15.6 million, up from $9.8 million in the prior year period. Adjusted Free Cash Flow for the quarter was $13.6 million, compared to $7.3 million in the same period a year ago.

    Liquidity and Capital Resources

    As of March 31, 2025, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of $196.4 million. We had full unused capacity on our revolving credit facility of $50.0 million as of March 31, 2025. The total outstanding term notes payable balance was $5.4 million as of March 31, 2025.

    2025 Adjusted Outlook

    Based on our strong first quarter results, the Company has updated its full-year 2025 guidance by raising the range of the outlook across all key metrics to reflect the improved visibility and confidence in the Company’s execution.

    • Organic Revenue Growth Rate*: Expected to be in the range of 12% to 16% (prior: 11% to 16%)
    • Adjusted EBITDA Margin*: Expected to be in the range of 20% to 22% (prior: 19% to 21%)
    • Total Revenues: Expected to be between $240 million and $255 million (prior: $235 million to $250 million)

    The Company is unable to provide a reconciliation to the most directly comparable GAAP measures without unreasonable efforts due to the inherent difficulty in forecasting the timing of items that have not yet occurred, as well as quantifying certain amounts that are necessary for such reconciliation.

    *For a definition of Organic Revenue Growth Rate and Adjusted EBITDA Margin, see “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” below.

    Conference Call Information

    TWFG will host a conference call and webcast tomorrow at 9:00 AM ET to discuss these results.

    To access the call by phone, participants should register at this link, where they will be provided with the dial in details. A live webcast of the conference call will also be available on TWFG’s investor relations website at investors.twfg.com. A webcast replay of the call will be available at investors.twfg.com for one year following the call.

    About TWFG

    TWFG (NASDAQ: TWFG) is a high-growth, independent distribution platform for personal and commercial insurance in the United States and represents hundreds of insurance carriers that underwrite personal lines and commercial lines risks. For more information, please visit twfg.com.

    Forward-Looking Statements

    This press release contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 that involve substantial risks and uncertainties. All statements, other than statements of historical fact included in this release, are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements give our current expectations relating to our financial condition, results of operations, plans, objectives, future performance, and business. You can identify forward-looking statements by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. In some cases, you can identify these statements by forward-looking words such as “may,” “might,” “will,” “should,” “expects,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “outlook,” “predicts,” “potential” or “continue,” the negative of these terms and other comparable terminology. These forward-looking statements, which are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions about us, may include projections of our future financial performance, our anticipated growth strategies and anticipated trends in our business. These statements are only predictions based on our current expectations and projections about future events. There are important factors that could cause our actual results, level of activity, performance or achievements to differ materially from the results, level of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements, including those factors discussed under the captions entitled “Risk factors” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, any Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and the other documents that the Company files with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. You should specifically consider the numerous risks outlined under “Risk factors” in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024.

    Although we believe the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, level of activity, performance or achievements. Moreover, neither we nor any other person assumes responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of any of these forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise, except as may be required by law.

    Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Key Performance Indicators

    Non-GAAP Financial Measures

    Organic Revenue, Organic Revenue Growth, Adjusted Net Income, Adjusted Net Income Margin, Adjusted Diluted Earnings Per Share, Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA Margin and Adjusted Free Cash Flow included in this release are not measures of financial performance in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“GAAP”) and should not be considered substitutes for GAAP measures, including revenues (for Organic Revenue and Organic Revenue Growth), net income (for Adjusted Net Income, Adjusted Net Income Margin, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA Margin), diluted earnings per share (Adjusted Diluted Earnings Per Share), and cash flow from operating activities (for Adjusted Free Cash Flow), which we consider to be the most directly comparable GAAP measures. These non-GAAP financial measures have limitations as analytical tools, and when assessing our operating performance, you should not consider these non-GAAP financial measures in isolation or as substitutes for revenues, net income, operating cash flow or other consolidated financial statement data prepared in accordance with GAAP. Other companies may calculate any or all of these non-GAAP financial measures differently than we do, limiting their usefulness as comparative measures.

    Organic Revenue. Since the first quarter of 2025, we have utilized the revised calculation methodology for Organic Revenue to include policy fee income as it is directly correlated to MGA commission income. Our legacy calculation methodology removed policy fee income from Organic Revenue. Organic Revenue is total revenue (the most directly comparable GAAP measure) for the relevant period, excluding contingent income, non-policy fee income, other income and those revenues generated from acquired businesses with over $0.5 million in annualized revenue that have not reached the twelve-month owned mark.

    Organic Revenue Growth. Organic Revenue Growth is the change in Organic Revenue period-to-period, with prior period results adjusted to include revenues that were excluded in the prior period because the relevant acquired businesses had not reached the twelve-month-owned milestone but have reached the twelve-month owned milestone in the current period. We believe Organic Revenue Growth is an appropriate measure of operating performance because it eliminates the impact of acquisitions, which affects the comparability of results from period to period.

    Adjusted Net Income. Adjusted Net Income is a supplemental measure of our performance and is defined as net income (the most directly comparable GAAP measure) before amortization, non-recurring or non-operating income and expenses, including equity-based compensation, adjusted to assume a single class of stock (Class A) and assuming noncontrolling interests do not exist. We believe Adjusted Net Income is a useful measure because it adjusts for the after-tax impact of significant one-time, non-recurring items and eliminates the impact of any transactions that do not directly affect what management considers to be our ongoing operating performance in the period. These adjustments generally eliminate the effects of certain items that may vary from company to company for reasons unrelated to overall operating performance.

    We are subject to U.S. federal income taxes, in addition to state, and local taxes, with respect to our allocable share of any net taxable income of TWFG Holding Company, LLC. Adjusted Net Income pre-IPO did not reflect adjustments for income taxes since TWFG Holding Company, LLC is a limited liability company and is classified as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Post-IPO, the calculation incorporates the impact of federal and state statutory tax rates on 100% of our adjusted pre-tax income as if the Company owned 100% of TWFG Holding Company, LLC.

    Adjusted Net Income Margin. Adjusted Net Income Margin is Adjusted Net Income divided by total revenues. We believe that Adjusted Net Income Margin is a useful measurement of operating profitability for the same reasons we find Adjusted Net Income useful and also because it provides a period-to-period comparison of our after-tax operating performance.

    Adjusted Diluted Earnings Per Share. Adjusted Diluted Earnings Per Share is Adjusted Net Income divided by diluted shares outstanding after adjusting for the effect of (i) the exchange of 100% of the outstanding Class B common stock of the Company (the “Class B Common Stock”) and Class C common stock of the Company (the “Class C Common Stock”) (together with the related limited liability units in TWFG Holding Company, LLC (the “LLC Units”)) into shares of Class A common stock of the Company (“Class A Common Stock”) and (ii) the vesting of 100% of the unvested equity awards and exchange into shares of Class A Common Stock. This measure does not deduct earnings related to the noncontrolling interests in TWFG Holding Company, LLC for the period prior to July 19, 2024, when we did not own 100% of the business. The most directly comparable GAAP financial metric is diluted earnings per share. We believe Adjusted Diluted Earnings Per Share may be useful to an investor in evaluating our operating performance and efficiency because this measure is widely used by investors to measure a company’s operating performance without regard to items excluded from the calculation of such measure, which can vary substantially from company to company depending upon acquisition activity and capital structure. This measure also eliminates the impact of expenses that do not relate to core business performance, among other factors.

    Adjusted EBITDA. Adjusted EBITDA is a supplemental measure of our performance and is defined as EBITDA adjusted to reflect items such as equity-based compensation, interest income, other non-operating and certain nonrecurring items. EBITDA is defined as net income (the most directly comparable GAAP measure) before interest, income taxes, depreciation, and amortization. We believe that Adjusted EBITDA is an appropriate measure of operating performance because it adjusts for significant one-time, non-recurring items and eliminates the ongoing accounting effects of certain capital spending and acquisitions, such as depreciation and amortization, that do not directly affect what management considers to be our ongoing operating performance in the period. These adjustments eliminate the effects of certain items that may vary from company to company for reasons unrelated to overall operating performance. Our measure of Adjusted EBITDA is not necessarily comparable to other similarly titled captions of other companies due to potential inconsistencies in the methods of calculation.

    Adjusted EBITDA Margin. Adjusted EBITDA Margin is Adjusted EBITDA divided by total revenue. We believe that Adjusted EBITDA Margin is a useful measurement of operating profitability for the same reasons we find Adjusted EBITDA useful and also because it provides a period-to-period comparison of our operating performance.

    Adjusted Free Cash Flow. Adjusted Free Cash Flow is a supplemental measure of our performance. We define Adjusted Free Cash Flow as cash flow from operating activities (the most directly comparable GAAP measure) less cash payments for tax distributions, purchases of property and equipment and acquisition-related costs. We believe Adjusted Free Cash Flow is a useful measure of operating performance because it represents the cash flow from the business that is within our discretion to direct to activities including investments, debt repayment, and returning capital to stockholders.

    The reconciliation of the above non-GAAP measures to their most comparable GAAP financial measure is outlined in the reconciliation table accompanying this release.

    Key Performance Indicators

    Total Written Premium. Total Written Premium represents, for any reported period, the total amount of current premium (net of cancellation) placed with insurance carriers. We utilize Total Written Premium as a key performance indicator when planning, monitoring, and evaluating our performance. We believe Total Written Premium is a useful metric because it is the underlying driver of the majority of our revenue.

    Contacts
    Investor Contact:
    Gene Padgett, CAO for TWFG
    Email: gene.padgett@twfg.com

    PR Contact:
    Alex Bunch, CMO for TWFG
    Email: alex@twfg.com


    Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income
    (Unaudited)
    (Amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

        Three Months Ended
    March 31,
          2025       2024  
    Revenues        
    Commission income(1)   $ 48,785     $ 42,545  
    Contingent income     1,663       1,076  
    Fee income(2)     3,011       2,232  
    Other income     364       290  
    Total revenues     53,823       46,143  
    Expenses        
    Commission expense     31,814       26,443  
    Salaries and employee benefits     8,196       6,254  
    Other administrative expenses(3)     4,724       3,130  
    Depreciation and amortization     3,359       3,013  
    Total operating expenses     48,093       38,840  
    Operating income     5,730       7,303  
    Interest expense     83       842  
    Interest income     1,863       170  
    Other non-operating expense     1       2  
    Income before tax     7,509       6,629  
    Income tax expense     656        
    Net income     6,853       6,629  
    Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interests     5,515       6,629  
    Net income attributable to TWFG, Inc.     1,338        
             
    Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding:        
    Basic     14,889,739      
    Diluted     15,055,553      
    Earnings per share:        
    Basic   $ 0.09      
    Diluted   $ 0.09      
             

    (1) Commission income – related party of $3,135 and $1,109 for the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively
    (2) Fee income – related party of $834 and $354 for the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively
    (3) Other administrative expenses – related party of $770 and $401 for the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively

    The following table presents the disaggregation of our revenues by offerings (in thousands):

        Three Months Ended March 31,
          2025       2024  
    Insurance Services        
    Agency-in-a-Box   $ 35,996     $ 31,729  
    Corporate Branches     8,223       7,276  
    Total Insurance Services     44,219       39,005  
    TWFG MGA     9,195       6,794  
    Other     409       344  
    Total revenues   $ 53,823     $ 46,143  
             

    The following table presents the disaggregation of our commission income by offerings (in thousands):

        Three Months Ended March 31,
          2025       2024  
    Insurance Services        
    Agency-in-a-Box   $ 33,358     $ 29,900  
    Corporate Branches     8,214       7,250  
    Total Insurance Services     41,572       37,150  
    TWFG MGA     7,213       5,395  
    Total commission income   $ 48,785     $ 42,545  
             

    The following table presents the disaggregation of our fee income by major sources (in thousands):

        Three Months Ended March 31,
          2025       2024  
    Policy fees   $ 1,051     $ 513  
    Branch fees     1,256       1,131  
    License fees     608       515  
    TPA fees     96       73  
    Total fee income   $ 3,011     $ 2,232  
             

    The following table presents the disaggregation of our commission expense by offerings (in thousands):

        Three Months Ended March 31,
          2025       2024  
    Insurance Services        
    Agency-in-a-Box   $ 25,954       22,028  
    Corporate Branches     1,105       862  
    Total Insurance Services     27,059       22,890  
    TWFG MGA     4,726       3,535  
    Other     29       18  
    Total commission expense   $ 31,814     $ 26,443  
             


    Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
    (Unaudited)
    (Amounts in thousands, except share/unit data)

        March 31, 2025   December 31, 2024
    Assets        
    Current assets        
    Cash and cash equivalents   $ 196,424     $ 195,772  
    Restricted cash     11,853       9,551  
    Commissions receivable, net     23,575       27,067  
    Accounts receivable     8,053       7,839  
    Other current assets, net     1,500       1,619  
    Total current assets     241,405       241,848  
    Non-current assets        
    Intangible assets, net     80,919       72,978  
    Property and equipment, net     3,364       3,499  
    Lease right-of-use assets, net     4,307       4,493  
    Other non-current assets     535       610  
    Total assets   $ 330,530     $ 323,428  
             
    Liabilities and Equity        
    Current liabilities        
    Commissions payable   $ 16,303     $ 13,848  
    Carrier liabilities     14,710       12,392  
    Operating lease liabilities, current     1,124       1,013  
    Short-term bank debt     1,927       1,912  
    Deferred acquisition payable, current     1,956       601  
    Other current liabilities     6,842       9,851  
    Total current liabilities     42,862       39,617  
    Non-current liabilities        
    Operating lease liabilities, net of current portion     3,119       3,372  
    Long-term bank debt     3,519       4,007  
    Deferred acquisition payable, non-current     973       1,122  
    Other non-current liabilities           24  
    Total liabilities     50,473       48,142  
    Commitment and contingencies (see Note 14)        
    Stockholders’/Members’ Equity        
    Class A common stock ($0.01 par value per share – 300,000,000 authorized, 14,904,083 and 14,811,874 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, respectively )     149       148  
    Class B common stock ($0.00001 par value per share – 100,000,000 authorized, 7,277,651 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024)            
    Class C common stock ($0.00001 par value per share – 100,000,000 authorized, 33,893,810 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024)            
    Additional paid-in capital     58,374       58,365  
    Retained earnings     16,626       15,288  
    Accumulated other comprehensive income     65       83  
    Total stockholders’ equity attributable to TWFG, Inc.     75,214       73,884  
    Noncontrolling interests     204,843       201,402  
    Total stockholders’ equity     280,057       275,286  
    Total liabilities and equity   $ 330,530     $ 323,428  
             


    Non-GAAP Financial Measures

    A reconciliation of Organic Revenue and Organic Revenue Growth Rate to Total Revenue and Total Revenue Growth Rate, the most directly comparable GAAP measures, is as follows (in thousands):

    Revised Calculation Methodology Applied to Current Period
        Three Months Ended
    March 31,
          2025       2024  
    Total revenues   $ 53,823     $ 46,143  
    Acquisition adjustments(1)     (610 )     (1,467 )
    Contingent income     (1,663 )     (1,076 )
    Fee income     (3,011 )     (2,232 )
    Policy fee income     1,051       513  
    Other income     (364 )     (290 )
    Organic Revenue   $ 49,226     $ 41,591  
    Organic Revenue Growth(2)   $ 6,169     $ 4,780  
    Total Revenue Growth Rate(3)     16.6 %     15.8 %
    Organic Revenue Growth Rate(2)     14.3 %     13.0 %
             

    (1) Represents revenues generated from the acquired businesses during the first 12 months following an acquisition.
    (2) Revised Organic Revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2024 and 2023, used to calculate Organic Revenue Growth for the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2024, was $43.1 million and $36.8 million, respectively, which is adjusted to reflect revenues from acquired businesses with over $0.5 million in annualized revenue that reached the twelve-month owned mark during the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. Organic Revenue Growth Rate represents the period-to-period change in Organic Revenue divided by the total adjusted Organic Revenue in the prior period.
    (3) Represents the period-to-period change in total revenues divided by the total revenues in the prior period.

    Legacy Calculation Methodology Applied to Current Period
        Three Months Ended
    March 31,
          2025       2024  
    Total revenues   $ 53,823     $ 46,143  
    Acquisition adjustments(1)     (610 )     (1,467 )
    Contingent income     (1,663 )     (1,076 )
    Fee income     (3,011 )     (2,232 )
    Other income     (364 )     (290 )
    Organic Revenue   $ 48,175     $ 41,078  
    Organic Revenue Growth(2)   $ 5,630     $ 4,822  
    Total Revenue Growth Rate(3)     16.6 %     15.8 %
    Organic Revenue Growth Rate(2)     13.2 %     13.3 %
             

    (1) Represents revenues generated from the acquired businesses during the first 12 months following an acquisition.
    (2) Organic Revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2024 and 2023, used to calculate Organic Revenue Growth for the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2024, was $42.5 million and $36.3 million, respectively, which is adjusted to reflect revenues from acquired businesses with over $0.5 million in annualized revenue that reached the twelve-month owned mark during the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. Organic Revenue Growth Rate represents the period-to-period change in Organic Revenue divided by the total adjusted Organic Revenue in the prior period.
    (3) Represents the period-to-period change in total revenues divided by the total revenues in the prior period.

    A reconciliation of Adjusted Net Income and Adjusted Net Income Margin to Net income and Net income Margin, the most directly comparable GAAP measures, for each of the periods indicated is as follows (in thousands):

    Revised Calculation Methodology Applied to Current Period
        Three Months Ended
    March 31,
          2025       2024  
    Total revenues   $ 53,823     $ 46,143  
    Net income   $ 6,853     $ 6,629  
    Income tax expense     656        
    Acquisition-related expenses     33        
    Equity-based compensation     1,204        
    Other non-recurring items(1)           (1,477 )
    Amortization expense     3,210       2,917  
    Adjusted income before income taxes     11,956       8,069  
    Adjusted income tax expense(2)     (2,736 )      
    Adjusted Net Income   $ 9,220     $ 8,069  
    Net Income Margin     12.7 %     14.4 %
    Adjusted Net Income Margin     17.1 %     17.5 %
             
    Legacy Calculation Methodology Applied to Current Period
        Three Months Ended
    March 31,
          2025       2024  
    Total revenues   $ 53,823     $ 46,143  
    Net income   $ 6,853     $ 6,629  
    Income tax expense     656        
    Acquisition-related expenses     33        
    Equity-based compensation     1,204        
    Other non-recurring items(1)           (1,477 )
    Adjusted income before income taxes   $ 8,746     $ 5,152  
    Adjusted income tax expense(2)     (2,001 )      
    Adjusted Net Income   $ 6,745     $ 5,152  
    Net Income Margin     12.7 %     14.4 %
    Adjusted Net Income Margin     12.5 %     11.2 %
             

    (1) Represents a one-time adjustment reducing commission expense, which resulted from the branch conversions. In January 2024, nine of our Branches converted to Corporate Branches. Upon conversion, agents of the newly converted Corporate Branches became employees and received salaries, employee benefits, and bonuses for services rendered instead of commissions. As a result, we released a portion of the unpaid commissions related to the converted branches that we no longer are required to settle.
    (2) Post-IPO, we are subject to United States federal income taxes, in addition to state, local, and foreign taxes, with respect to our allocable share of any net taxable income of TWFG Holding Company, LLC. For the three months ended March 31, 2025, the calculation of adjusted income tax expense is based on a federal statutory rate of 21% and a blended state income tax rate of 1.88% on 100% of our adjusted income before income taxes as if we owned 100% of the TWFG Holding Company, LLC.

    A reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA Margin to Net income and Net income margin, the most directly comparable GAAP measures, for each of the periods indicated is as follows (in thousands):

        Three Months Ended
    March 31,
          2025       2024  
    Total revenues   $ 53,823     $ 46,143  
    Net income   $ 6,853     $ 6,629  
    Interest expense     83       842  
    Interest income     (1,863 )     (170 )
    Depreciation and amortization     3,359       3,013  
    Income tax expense     656        
    EBITDA     9,088       10,314  
    Acquisition-related expenses     33        
    Equity-based compensation     1,204        
    Interest income     1,863       170  
    Other non-recurring items(1)           (1,477 )
    Adjusted EBITDA   $ 12,188     $ 9,007  
    Net Income Margin     12.7 %     14.4 %
    Adjusted EBITDA Margin     22.6 %     19.5 %
             

    (1) Represents a one-time adjustment reducing commission expense, which resulted from the branch conversions. In January 2024, nine of our Branches converted to Corporate Branches. Upon conversion, agents of the newly converted Corporate Branches became employees and received salaries, employee benefits, and bonuses for services rendered instead of commissions. As a result, we released a portion of the unpaid commissions related to the converted branches that we no longer are required to settle.

    A reconciliation of Adjusted Free Cash Flow to Cash Flow from Operating Activities, the most directly comparable GAAP measure, for each of the periods indicated is as follows (in thousands):

        Three Months Ended
    March 31,
          2025       2024  
    Cash Flow from Operating Activities   $ 15,645     $ 9,754  
    Purchase of property and equipment     (15 )     (8 )
    Tax distribution to members(1)     (2,024 )     (2,420 )
    Acquisition-related expenses     33        
    Adjusted Free Cash Flow   $ 13,639     $ 7,326  
             

    (1) Tax distributions to members represents the amount distributed to the members of TWFG Holding Company, LLC in respect of their income tax liability related to the net income of TWFG Holding Company, LLC allocated to its members.

    A reconciliation of Adjusted Diluted Earnings Per Share to diluted earnings per share, the most directly comparable GAAP measure, is as follows:

        Three Months Ended March 31,
          2025  
    Earnings per share of common stock – diluted   $ 0.09  
    Plus: Impact of all LLC Units exchanged for Class A Common Stock(1)     0.03  
    Plus: Adjustments to Adjusted net income(2)     0.04  
    Adjusted Diluted Earnings Per Share   $ 0.16  
         
    Weighted average common stock outstanding – diluted     15,055,553  
    Plus: Impact of all LLC Units exchanged for Class A Common Stock(1)     41,171,461  
    Adjusted Diluted Earnings Per Share diluted share count     56,227,014  
         

    (1) For comparability purposes, this calculation incorporates the net income that would be distributable if all shares of Class B Common Stock and Class C Common Stock, together with the related LLC Units, were exchanged for shares of Class A Common Stock. For the three months ended March 31, 2025, this includes $5.5 million of net income on 56,227,014 weighted-average shares of common stock outstanding – diluted. For the three months ended March 31, 2025, 41,260,844 weighted average outstanding Class B Common Stock and Class C Common Stock were considered dilutive and included in the 56,227,014 weighted-average shares of common stock outstanding – diluted within diluted earnings per share calculation.
    (2) Adjustments to Adjusted Net Income are described in the footnotes of the reconciliation of Adjusted Net Income to Net Income in “Adjusted Net Income and Adjusted Net Income Margin”, which represent the difference between Net Income of $6.9 million and Adjusted Net Income of $9.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025. For the three months ended March 31, 2025, Adjusted Diluted Earnings Per Share include adjustments of $2.4 million to Adjusted Net Income on 56,227,014 weighted-average shares of common stock outstanding – diluted for the period presented.

    Key Performance Indicators

    The following presents the disaggregation of Total Written Premium by offerings, business mix and line of business (in thousands):

        Three Months Ended March 31,
          2025       2024  
        Amount   % of Total   Amount   % of Total
    Offerings:                
    Insurance Services                
    Agency-in-a-Box   $ 249,475     68 %   $ 218,936     68 %
    Corporate Branches     68,098     18       57,884     18  
    Total Insurance Services     317,573     86       276,820     86  
    TWFG MGA     53,389     14       44,446     14  
    Total written premium   $ 370,962     100 %   $ 321,266     100 %
                     
    Business Mix:                
    Insurance Services                
    Renewal business   $ 244,845     66 %     214,477     67 %
    New business     72,728     20       62,343     19  
    Total Insurance Services     317,573     86       276,820     86  
                     
    TWFG MGA                
    Renewal business     36,375     9       35,464     11  
    New business     17,014     5       8,982     3  
    Total TWFG MGA     53,389     14       44,446     14  
        Total written premium   $ 370,962     100 %   $ 321,266     100 %
                     
    Written Premium Retention:                
    Insurance Services       88 %       97 %
    TWFG MGA       82         81  
    Consolidated       88         94  
                     
    Line of Business:                
    Personal lines   $ 298,289     80 %   $ 254,864     79 %
    Commercial lines     72,673     20       66,402     21  
    Total written premium   $ 370,962     100 %   $ 321,266     100 %
                     

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI USA: Hageman’s Expedited Appeals Review Act Passes the House of Representatives

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Wyoming Congresswoman Harriet Hageman

    Washington, D.C. – Today, Congresswoman Hageman’s Expedited Appeals Review Act (EARA) passed the House of Representatives. The bill will provide those individuals and businesses appealing before the Department of the Interior’s Board of Land Appeals (IBLA) the opportunity to file for an expedited review so they can quickly go to court in front of a neutral arbiter. 

    Under current law, challengers of an agency decision within the Department of Interior (DOI), must appeal to the IBLA, an administrative court that is also housed within the DOI itself. The use of administrative courts poses a variety of constitutional issues, including in relation to the separation of powers, as the agencies who adopt the regulations then pursue enforcement of them through their own in-house court system, such as the IBLA. This system tips the scale in favor of the agency who enjoy outsized success before their own courts, with the DOI winning 98% of the challenges that are filed before the IBLA and decided on the merits.    

    “After spending three decades practicing law and witnessing cases argued before agency-appointed judges on numerous occasions, and then being forced to wait as the IBLA delayed issuing a decision, it is fulfilling to see this bill to move forward,” Hageman stated. “The government works for the people, not the other way around. The EARA creates an alternative path for expedited review, allowing stakeholders to request an accelerated decision of their appeals within six months of the request. It gives parties the opportunity to expedite the process and pursue an impartial route in circumstances where the IBLA is failing to timely address matters under its review.” 

    House Natural Resource Committee Chairman Bruce Westerman (AR-04) said in support of the bill, “As of today, there are more than 650 backlogged appeals before the Interior Board of Land Appeals, some a decade old. Ms. Hageman’s bill will revive the process and ensure appellants get their day in court by requiring the board to issue final decisions in a timely manner. I thank her for her work on this bill.”  

    The Expedited Appeals Review Act ensures that if IBLA fails to make a decision within 18 months of the appeal being filed, the applicant can demand an expedited review. The IBLA then has six months to resolve the case. Failure to do so allows for the non-agency party to proceed to an Article III district court where they will be granted the opportunity to conduct discovery and develop the administrative record. 

      

    Background:   

    • The IBLA is a regulatorily constructed, pseudo-judicial, administrative court within the Department of the Interior. It oversees appeals of agency actions, including those from the Bureau of Land Management, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement, Office of Natural Resources Revenue, and Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement.
    • The IBLA currently has a backlog of over 650 pending appeals dating back to 2014. The IBLA receives, on average, 290 appeals per fiscal year. Of those cases that are not resolved on jurisdictional or procedural grounds, only 2 percent are decided in favor of the appellant.
    • During an appeal, the agency establishes the administrative record. Frequently, the record is heavily redacted and purposefully excludes documents that favor the appellant. In fact, IBLA judges have explicitly found that the Department compiled administrative records in bad faith and in a biased manner.
    • As a member of the House Judiciary Committee, last year Rep. Hageman spearheaded an oversight hearing titled “Reining in the Administrative State: Agency Adjudication and Other Agency Action” which exposed the unconstitutionality of administrative courts. She has also introduced the Seventh Amendment Restoration Act to enact broader reforms for all administrative courts.
    • Prior to taking office as Wyoming’s lone congressional member, Harriet Hageman was an attorney defending individuals and entities against government agencies, winning cases against several of the agencies that are within the Department of Interior. 
       

    ### 

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI: Westport Fuel Systems Reports First Quarter 2025 Financial Results

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    VANCOUVER, British Columbia, May 13, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Westport Fuel Systems Inc. (“Westport“) (TSX:WPRT / Nasdaq:WPRT) reported financial results for the first quarter ended March 31, 2025, and provided an update on operations. All figures are in U.S. dollars unless otherwise stated.

    “We continue to make significant strides in transforming Westport and sharpening our strategic focus. Our priorities remain clear: driving success through Cespira, our HPDI joint venture with Volvo Group; pursuing operational excellence through initiatives to streamline processes and reduce costs; and positioning Westport at the forefront of the alternative fuel shift.

    These priorities are guiding us as we work towards a brighter future. We’re seeing the impact of our efforts in our recent results – we significantly improved our net loss to $2.5 million in Q1 of 2025 from a net loss of $13.6 million in Q1 of 2024. This was supported by a $3.5 million increase in gross profit and an $8.1 million decrease in operating expenses. We also reported a substantial improvement in adjusted EBITDA as compared to the same period of the prior year.

    Looking to the future, with the announcement of the proposed sale of our light-duty business, Westport is realigning to focus on the hard-to-decarbonize applications primarily in long-haul and heavy-duty trucking where our unique HPDI and high-pressure technologies offer significant growth potential. Critically, this transaction is designed to provide immediate cash proceeds that bolster our balance sheet and fund growth opportunities in Cespira and the High-Pressure Controls & Systems business.

    Now, the conversation has changed. Our attendance at the Advanced Clean Transportation Expo or ACT Expo, the largest showcase of clean transportation technologies in North America, validated our view that the market recognizes that the internal combustion engine utilizing alternative fuels is an affordable solution that also decarbonizes long-haul, heavy-duty transport. Westport is the clean-tech innovation company to help drive this change. Through Cespira, the HPDI fuel system does the on-engine work to our High Pressure Controls and Systems business where our components do the off-engine work we are providing OEMs with simplified solutions to decarbonize.

    Volvo recently highlighted that demand for their gas-powered trucks that utilize HPDI technology has been increasing, with sales up more than 25% in 2024, a trend that we saw continue into Q1 with Cespira delivering improved revenue driven by increased volumes as compared to Q1 of 2024. While we remain focused on scaling our alternative fuel solutions, including LNG, CNG, RNG, and hydrogen systems, we are matching the cleanest gaseous fuels with the most efficient engine technologies. We are committed to delivering practical, commercially viable low-carbon solutions today and providing sustainable, high-performance solutions that help our customers achieve their goals now and for years to come.”

    Dan Sceli, Chief Executive Officer

    Q1 2025 Highlights

    • Revenues decreased 9% to $71.0 million compared to the same period in 2024, primarily driven by decreased sales volumes in our Heavy-Duty OEM and High-Pressure Controls & Systems segments. This was partially offset by increased sales in our Light-Duty segment in the quarter. In Q1 2024, our Heavy-Duty OEM segment included the financial results of the HPDI business which are now accounted for as part of the Cespira joint venture.
    • Net loss of $2.5 million for the quarter compared to net loss of $13.6 million for the same quarter last year. The decrease in net loss was driven by a $3.5 million increase in gross profit, decrease in operating expenditures by $8.1 million; change in foreign exchange gain or loss by $2.3 million and an increase in loss from investments accounted for by the equity method of $3.8 million.
    • Adjusted EBITDA[1] of nil  compared to negative $6.6 million for the same period in 2024.
    • Cash and cash equivalents were $32.6 million at the end of the first quarter. Cash used in operating activities during the quarter was $4.9 million with net cash used by working capital of $8.1 million, partially offset by operating income of $1.7 million. Investing activities included the collection of $10.5 million in a holdback receivable related to our previous sale of CWI to Cummins in 2022, capital contribution into Cespira of $4.7 million and purchase of capital assets of $3.1 million. Cash used in financing activities was attributed to net debt repayments of $3.9 million in the quarter.

    [1] Adjusted earnings before interest, taxes and depreciation is a non-GAAP measure. Please refer to NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES in Westport’s Management Discussion and Analysis for the reconciliation.

    Consolidated Results      Over /   
    ($ in millions, except per share amounts)     (Under)   
      1Q25 1Q24 %  
    Revenue $ 71.0   $ 77.6   (9 )%
    Gross Profit(2)   15.2     11.7   30 %
    Gross Margin(2)   21 %   15 %  
    Income (loss) from Investments Accounted for by the Equity Method(1)   (3.8 )     (100 )%
    Net Loss   (2.5 )   (13.6 ) 82 %
    Net Loss per Share – Basic   (0.14 )   (0.79 ) 82 %
    Net Loss per Share – Diluted   (0.14 )   (0.79 ) 82 %
    EBITDA (2)   (0.1 )   (9.2 ) 99 %
    Adjusted EBITDA (2)       (6.6 ) 100 %

    (1) This includes income or loss primarily from our investments in Cespira and Minda Westport Technologies Limited
    (2) Gross margins, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are non-GAAP measures. Please refer to GAAP and NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES for the reconciliation to equivalent GAAP measures and limitations on the use of such measures.

    Segment Information

    Light-Duty

    Revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2025 was $64.2 million compared with $63.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2024. Light-Duty revenue increased by $0.9 million compared to the prior year and was primarily driven by increase in sales in our light-duty OEM and DOEM businesses. The light-duty OEM business had an increase in sales from its Euro 6 program compared to the prior year. In the first quarter of 2024, DOEM had a significant decrease in sales to a customer. This was partially offset by lower sales in our IAM, electronics and fuel storage businesses compared to the prior year.

    Gross profit for the three months ended March 31, 2025 increased by $1.6 million to $14.0 million, or 22% of revenue, compared to $12.4 million, or 20% of revenue, for the same prior year period. This was primarily driven by a change in sales mix with an increase in sales to European customers and a reduction in sales to developing regions.

    High Pressure Controls & Systems

    Revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2025 was $1.4 million compared with $2.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2024. The decrease in revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2025 compared to the prior year was primarily driven by the hydrogen industry slowdown impacting demand for hydrogen components.

    Gross profit for the three months ended March 31, 2025 decreased by $0.2 million to $0.2 million, or 14% of revenue, compared to $0.4 million, or 17% of revenue, for the same prior year period. This was primarily driven by lower sales volumes increasing the per unit manufacturing costs in the quarter.

    Heavy-Duty Original Equipment Manufacturer (“OEM”)

    Revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2025 was $5.4 million, compared to $11.9 million for the prior year. The decrease in revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2025 is a result of the continuation of the business in Cespira. The revenue earned in the current quarter was from our services provided under the transitional service agreement with Cespira that is expected to end by Q2 2026.

    Gross profit for the three months ended March 31, 2025 increased by $2.1 million to $1.0 million, or 19% of revenue, compared to negative $1.1 million or negative 9% of revenue, for the same prior year period. The Heavy-Duty OEM segment received $0.9million in credits from component suppliers for inventory sold in the quarter.

    Selected Cespira Statements of Operations Data

    We account for Cespira using the equity method of accounting. However, due to its significance to our long-term strategy and operating results, we disclose certain Cespira’s financial information in notes 7 and 17 of our interim financial statements for the three months ended March 31, 2025.

    The following table sets forth a summary of the financial results of Cespira for the three months ended March 31, 2025 .

    (in millions of U.S. dollars)   Three months ended March 31,   Change
          2025       2024     $   %
    Total revenue   $ 16.7     $     $ 16.7     %
    Gross profit   $ 0.5     $     $ 0.5     %
    Gross margin1     3 %     %        
    Operating loss   $ (7.1 )   $     $ (7.1 )   %
    Net loss attributable to the Company   $ (3.9 )   $     $ (3.9 )   %

    1Gross margin is non-GAAP financial measure. See the section ‘Non-GAAP Financial Measures’ for explanations and discussions of these non-GAAP financial measures or ratios.

    Revenue

    Cespira revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2025 were $16.7 million. In the prior year, the Heavy-Duty OEM segment, which included our HPDI business, had revenues of $11.9 million. This was primarily driven by an increase in HPDI fuel systems sold in the period.

    Gross Profit

    Gross profit was $0.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025. In the prior year, the Heavy-Duty OEM segment had negative $1.1 million in gross profit primarily driven by the increase in sales volumes compared to the prior year and reductions in manufacturing cost.

    Operating loss

    Cespira incurred operating losses of $7.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025. Cespira continues to incur operating losses as it scales its operations and expand into other markets.

    Q1 2025 Conference Call
    Westport has scheduled a conference call for May 14, 2025, at 7:00 am Pacific Time (10:00 pm Eastern Time) to discuss these results. To access the conference call please register at
    https://register-conf.media-server.com/register/BI73bcac200e5f4652873668cf803d72ed

    The live webcast of the conference call can be accessed through the Westport website at
    https://investors.wfsinc.com/.

    Participants may register up to 60 minutes before the event by clicking on the call link and completing the online registration form. Upon registration, the user will receive dial-in info and a unique PIN, along with an email confirming the details.

    The webcast will be archived on Westport’s website at https://investors.wfsinc.com.

    Financial Statements and Management’s Discussion and Analysis

    To view Westport financials for the first quarter ended March 31st, 2025, please visit https://investors.wfsinc.com/financials/

    About Westport Fuel Systems

    At Westport Fuel Systems, we are driving innovation to power a cleaner tomorrow. We are a leading supplier of advanced fuel delivery components and systems for clean, low-carbon fuels such as natural gas, renewable natural gas, propane, and hydrogen to the global automotive industry. Our technology delivers the performance and fuel efficiency required by transportation applications and the environmental benefits that address climate change and urban air quality challenges. Headquartered in Vancouver, Canada, with operations in Europe, Asia, North America, and South America, we serve our customers in approximately 70 countries with leading global transportation brands. At Westport Fuel Systems, we think ahead. For more information, visit www.wfsinc.com.

    Cautionary Note Regarding Forward Looking Statements
    This press release contains forward-looking statements, including statements regarding future strategic initiatives and future growth, future of our development programs (including those relating to HPDI and Hydrogen), our expectations for 2024 and beyond, including the demand for our products, and the future success of our business and technology strategies. These statements are neither promises nor guarantees, but involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties and are based on both the views of management and assumptions that may cause our actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activities, performance or achievements expressed in or implied by these forward looking statements. These risks, uncertainties and assumptions include those related to our revenue growth, operating results, industry and products, the general economy, conditions of and access to the capital and debt markets, solvency, governmental policies and regulation, technology innovations, fluctuations in foreign exchange rates, operating expenses, continued reduction in expenses, ability to successfully commercialize new products, the performance of our joint ventures, the availability and price of natural gas and hydrogen, new environmental regulations, the acceptance of and shift to natural gas and hydrogen vehicles,fuel emission standards, the development of competing technologies, our ability to adequately develop and deploy our technology, the actions and determinations of our joint venture and development partners, the effects and duration of the Russia-Ukraine conflict, supply chain disruptions as well as other risk factors and assumptions that may affect our actual results, performance or achievements or financial position discussed in our most recent Annual Information Form and other filings with securities regulators. Readers should not place undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date they were made. We disclaim any obligation to publicly update or revise such statements to reflect any change in our expectations or in events, conditions or circumstances on which any such statements may be based, or that may affect the likelihood that actual results will differ from those set forth in these forward-looking statements except as required by National Instrument 51-102.

    Contact Information
    Investor Relations
    Westport Fuel Systems
    T: +1 604-718-2046

    GAAP and Non-GAAP Financial Measures

    Our financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”). These U.S. GAAP financial statements include non-cash charges and other charges and benefits that may be unusual or infrequent in nature or that we believe may make comparisons to our prior or future performance difficult. In addition to conventional measures prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP, Westport and certain investors use EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA as an indicator of our ability to generate liquidity by producing operating cash flow to fund working capital needs, service debt obligations and fund capital expenditures. Management also uses these non-GAAP measures in its review and evaluation of the financial performance of Westport. EBITDA is also frequently used by investors and analysts for valuation purposes whereby EBITDA is multiplied by a factor or “EBITDA multiple” that is based on an observed or inferred relationship between EBITDA and market values to determine the approximate total enterprise value of a company. We believe that these non-GAAP financial measures also provide additional insight to investors and securities analysts as supplemental information to our U.S. GAAP results and as a basis to compare our financial performance period-over-period and to compare our financial performance with that of other companies. We believe that these non-GAAP financial measures facilitate comparisons of our core operating results from period to period and to other companies by, in the case of EBITDA, removing the effects of our capital structure (net interest income on cash deposits, interest expense on outstanding debt and debt facilities), asset base (depreciation and amortization) and tax consequences. Adjusted EBITDA provides this same indicator of Westports’ EBITDA from continuing operations and removing such effects of our capital structure, asset base and tax consequences, but additionally excludes any unrealized foreign exchange gains or losses, stock-based compensation charges and other one-time impairments and costs which are not expected to be repeated in order to provide greater insight into the cash flow being produced from our operating business, without the influence of extraneous events.

    Segment Information

    EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are intended to provide additional information to investors and analysts and do not have any standardized definition under U.S. GAAP, and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA exclude the impact of cash costs of financing activities and taxes, and the effects of changes in operating working capital balances, and therefore are not necessarily indicative of operating profit or cash flow from operations as determined under U.S. GAAP. Other companies may calculate EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA differently.

    Segment earnings or losses before income taxes, interest, depreciation, and amortization (“Segment EBITDA”) is the measure of segment profitability used by the Company. The accounting policies of our reportable segments are the same as those applied in our consolidated financial statements. Management prepared the financial results of the Company’s reportable segments on basis that is consistent with the manner in which Management internally disaggregates financial information to assist in making internal operating decisions. Certain common costs and expenses, primarily corporate functions, among segments differently than we would for stand-alone financial information prepared in accordance with GAAP. These include certain costs and expenses of shared services, such as IT, human resources, legal, finance and supply chain management. Segment EBITDA is not defined under US GAAP and may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other companies and should not be considered a substitute for net earnings or other results reported in accordance with GAAP. Reconciliations of reportable segment information to consolidated statement of operations can be found in section “NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES & RECONCILIATIONS” within this press release.

      Three months ended March 31, 2025
      Light-Duty   High-Pressure Controls & Systems   Heavy-Duty OEM   Cespira   Total Segment
    Revenue $ 64.2   $ 1.4     $ 5.4   $ 16.7     $ 87.7
    Cost of revenue   50.2     1.2       4.4     16.2       72.0
    Gross profit   14.0     0.2       1.0     0.5       15.7
    Operating expenses:
    Research & development   3.0     1.0       0.1     3.1       7.2
    General & administrative   4.1     0.3       0.1     2.7       7.2
    Sales & marketing   2.3     0.1           0.3       2.7
    Depreciation & amortization   0.7     0.1           0.7       1.5
        10.1     1.5       0.2     6.8       18.6
    Equity income (note 8)   0.1                     0.1
    Add back: Depreciation & amortization   1.9     0.1           1.6       3.6
    Segment EBITDA $ 5.9   $ (1.2 )   $ 0.8   $ (4.7 )   $ 0.8
      Three months ended March 31, 2024
      Light-Duty   High-Pressure Controls & Systems   Heavy-Duty OEM   Total Segment
    Revenue $ 63.3   $ 2.4     $ 11.9     $ 77.6  
    Cost of revenue   50.9     2.0       13.0       65.9  
    Gross profit   12.4     0.4       (1.1 )     11.7  
    Operating expenses:              
    Research & development   3.6     1.3       2.8       7.7  
    General & administrative   3.7     0.2       1.8       5.7  
    Sales & marketing   2.1     0.2       0.5       2.8  
    Depreciation & amortization   0.6     0.1       0.1       0.8  
        10.0     1.8       5.2       17.0  
    Equity income                    
    Add back: Depreciation & amortization   1.5     0.1       1.4       3.0  
    Segment EBITDA $ 3.9   $ (1.3 )   $ (4.9 )   $ (2.3 )
    Gross Profit    
    (expressed in millions of U.S. dollars) 1Q25   1Q24
    Three months ended  
    Revenue $ 71.0     $ 77.6  
    Less: Cost of revenue   55.8       65.9  
    Gross profit   15.2       11.7  
    Gross margin %   21.4 %     15.1 %
      Three months ended March 31, 2025
      Total Segment   Less: Cespira   Add: Corporate & unallocated   Total Consolidated
    Revenue $ 87.7   $ 16.7   $     $ 71.0  
    Cost of revenue   72.0     16.2           55.8  
    Gross profit   15.7     0.5           15.2  
    Operating expenses:
    Research & development   7.2     3.1           4.1  
    General & administrative   7.2     2.7     1.9       6.4  
    Sales & marketing   2.7     0.3     0.3       2.7  
    Depreciation & amortization   1.5     0.7           0.8  
        18.6     6.8     2.2       14.0  
    Equity income (loss)   0.1         (3.9 )     (3.8 )
      Three months ended March 31, 2024
      Total Segment   Add: Corporate & unallocated   Total Consolidated
    Revenue $ 77.6   $   $ 77.6
    Cost of revenue   65.9         65.9
    Gross profit   11.7         11.7
    Operating expenses:
    Research & development   7.7         7.7
    General & administrative   5.7     4.7     10.4
    Sales & marketing   2.8     0.4     3.2
    Depreciation & amortization   0.8     0.2     1.0
        17.0     5.3     22.3
    Equity income          
    Reconciliation of Segment EBITDA to Loss before income taxes   Three months ended March 31,
        2025       2024  
    Total Segment EBITDA   $ 0.8     $ (2.3 )
    Adjustments:
    Depreciation & amortization     2.0       3.0  
    Cespira’s Segment EBITDA     (4.7 )      
    Cespira’s equity loss     3.9        
    Corporate and unallocated operating expenses     2.2       5.3  
    Foreign exchange loss     (0.5 )     1.8  
    Interest on long-term debt and accretion of royalty payable     0.7       0.8  
    Interest and other income, net of bank charges     (0.9 )     (0.3 )
    Loss before income taxes   $ (1.9 )   $ (12.9 )
    EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA        
    (expressed in millions of U.S. dollars)   1Q25   1Q24
    Three months ended    
    Loss before income taxes   $ (1.9 )   $ (12.9 )
    Interest expense (income), net     (0.2 )     0.5  
    Depreciation and amortization     2.0       3.2  
    EBITDA     (0.1 )     (9.2 )
    Stock based compensation (recovery)     0.3       0.3  
    Unrealized foreign exchange (gain) loss     (0.5 )     1.8  
    Severance costs           0.5  
    Restructuring costs     0.3        
    Adjusted EBITDA   $     $ (6.6 )
    WESTPORT FUEL SYSTEMS INC.
    Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (unaudited)
    (Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share amounts)
    March 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024
     
        March 31, 2025   December 31, 2024
    Assets        
    Current assets:        
    Cash and cash equivalents (including restricted cash)   $ 32,637     $ 37,646  
    Accounts receivable     66,634       73,054  
    Inventories     63,214       53,526  
    Prepaid expenses     6,551       5,660  
    Total current assets     169,036       169,886  
    Long-term investments     40,052       39,732  
    Property, plant and equipment     45,314       41,956  
    Operating lease right-of-use assets     19,249       19,019  
    Intangible assets     5,174       5,277  
    Deferred income tax assets     10,261       9,695  
    Goodwill     2,996       2,876  
    Other long-term assets     3,163       3,180  
    Total assets   $ 295,245     $ 291,621  
    Liabilities and shareholders’ equity        
    Current liabilities:        
    Accounts payable and accrued liabilities   $ 93,127     $ 88,123  
    Current portion of operating lease liabilities     2,750       2,624  
    Current portion of long-term debt     13,225       14,660  
    Current portion of warranty liability     4,013       3,861  
    Total current liabilities     113,115       109,268  
    Long-term operating lease liabilities     16,560       16,433  
    Long-term debt     17,915       19,067  
    Warranty liability     1,603       1,456  
    Deferred income tax liabilities     4,063       4,029  
    Other long-term liabilities     4,391       4,343  
    Total liabilities     157,647       154,596  
    Shareholders’ equity:        
    Share capital:        
    Unlimited common and preferred shares, no par value        
    17,326,732 (2024 – 17,282,934) common shares issued and outstanding     1,246,408       1,245,805  
    Other equity instruments     9,081       9,472  
    Additional paid in capital     11,516       11,516  
    Accumulated deficit     (1,098,726 )     (1,096,275 )
    Accumulated other comprehensive loss     (30,681 )     (33,493 )
    Total shareholders’ equity     137,598       137,025  
    Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity   $ 295,245     $ 291,621  
    WESTPORT FUEL SYSTEMS INC.
    Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) (unaudited)
    (Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share and per share amounts)
    Three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2024
     
        Three months ended March 31,
          2025       2024  
    Revenue   $ 70,955     $ 77,574  
    Cost of revenue     55,730       65,851  
    Gross profit     15,225       11,723  
    Operating expenses:        
    Research and development     4,052       7,693  
    General and administrative     6,397       10,353  
    Sales and marketing     2,758       3,287  
    Foreign exchange (gain) loss     (456 )     1,820  
    Depreciation and amortization     740       1,043  
          13,491       24,196  
    Income (loss) from operations     1,734       (12,473 )
             
    Income (loss) from investments accounted for by the equity method     (3,799 )     31  
    Interest on long-term debt     (676 )     (812 )
    Interest and other income, net of bank charges     869       341  
    Loss before income taxes     (1,872 )     (12,913 )
    Income tax expense     579       735  
    Net loss for the period     (2,451 )     (13,648 )
    Other comprehensive income (loss):        
    Cumulative translation adjustment     3,641       (430 )
    Ownership share of equity method investments’ other comprehensive loss     (829 )      
          2,812       (430 )
    Comprehensive income (loss)   $ 361     $ (14,078 )
             
    Loss per share:        
    Net loss per share – basic and diluted   $ (0.14 )     (0.79 )
    Weighted average common shares outstanding:        
    Basic and diluted     17,322,681       17,220,540  
    WESTPORT FUEL SYSTEMS INC.
    Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited)
    (Expressed in thousands of United States dollars)
    Three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2024
     
        Three months ended March 31,
          2025       2024  
    Operating activities:        
    Net loss for the period   $ (2,451 )   $ (13,648 )
    Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:        
    Depreciation and amortization     1,930       3,247  
    Stock-based compensation expense     212       331  
    Unrealized foreign exchange (gain) loss     (456 )     1,820  
    Deferred income tax (recovery)     (33 )     (40 )
    Loss (income) from investments accounted for by the equity method     3,799       (31 )
    Interest on long-term debt     22       22  
    Change in inventory write-downs     223       413  
    Change in bad debt expense     (33 )     (121 )
    Other           (248 )
    Changes in operating assets and liabilities:        
    Accounts receivable     (2,072 )     12,526  
    Inventories     (7,502 )     (7,434 )
    Prepaid expenses     (415 )     (400 )
    Accounts payable and accrued liabilities     2,840       4,725  
    Warranty liability     (963 )     (1,020 )
    Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities     (4,899 )     142  
    Investing activities:        
    Purchase of property, plant and equipment     (3,142 )     (4,893 )
    Proceeds on sale of assets     82       135  
    Proceeds from holdback receivable     10,450        
    Capital contributions to investments accounted for by the equity method (note 7)     (4,686 )      
    Net cash used in investing activities     2,704       (4,758 )
    Financing activities:        
    Repayments of operating lines of credit and long-term facilities     (3,918 )     (17,689 )
    Drawings on operating lines of credit and long-term facilities           11,848  
    Net cash used in financing activities     (3,918 )     (5,841 )
    Effect of foreign exchange on cash and cash equivalents     1,104       (494 )
    Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents     (5,009 )     (10,951 )
    Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period (including restricted cash)     37,646       54,853  
    Cash and cash equivalents, end of period (including restricted cash)   $ 32,637     $ 43,902  

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI: Dundee Corporation Delivers on Strategy With Strong Q1 Execution

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    TORONTO, May 13, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — The first quarter of 2025 was an important step forward for us – a period where we continued to execute on our long-term strategy and strengthen the business for the future, said Jonathan Goodman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Dundee Corporation. “We’ve been steadily working to simplify our portfolio, reduce leverage, and sharpen our focus on our core mining strategy. This quarter, we delivered on that plan. In February, we announced the pending sale of our interest in Android Industries to a strategic buyer – a transaction that once closed, will mark a significant milestone in our efforts to simplify the business and recycle capital into our core mining strategy. We also realized proceeds from the sale of G Mining Ventures, which we received in connection with G Mining’s acquisition of Reunion Gold last year. This outcome is a clear example of our approach in action: identifying high-quality assets early, backing strong teams, and exiting when value has been crystallized. The monetization of our original investment in Reunion, realized through the sale of G Mining Ventures shares, allowed us to fully repay our corporate loan facility. As a result, we ended the quarter with no debt at the parent level – a key strategic achievement that enhances our financial flexibility going forward.”  

    “Against a backdrop of rising gold prices, solid mining equity performance, and heightened macro uncertainty, we saw a timely opportunity to increase our exposure to high conviction investments. We participated in Magna Mining’s convertible debenture to support the integration of a producing copper-nickel-PGM asset in Sudbury. We also initiated a new position in Revival Gold through a strategic placement. Revival is advancing a portfolio of gold projects in the U.S. with scale, quality, and potential – and we are excited to support their progress as a new partner. Each of these investments reflects the kinds of assets and teams we want to align with: technically strong, well-managed, and positioned to deliver meaningful long-term value.”

    Mr. Goodman concluded: “We ended the quarter with a strong cash position, no parent-level debt, and a royalty that will deliver cash flow to Dundee in the second half of 2025. We are operating from a position of strength and focus. We are proud of what we have accomplished this quarter and remain energized by the opportunity ahead. None of this progress would be possible without the dedication, focus, and sharp execution of our team – they continue to be the driving force behind everything we achieve.”

    FIRST QUARTER 2025 RESULTS

    • The Corporation sold its remaining 2.9 million shares of G Mining Ventures Corp. (“G Mining”) for net proceeds of $45.3 million, after registering an additional $14.2 million investment gain during the quarter.
    • In February, Dundee repaid the remaining $5.0 million of loan principal outstanding with Earlston Investments Corp.
    • In February, Dundee announced the sale of its interest in Android Industries, LLC (“Android”) for cash proceeds of approximately $24.5 million at closing, with additional proceeds payable contingent upon the release of all escrows. The transaction is now expected to close in the second quarter of 2025, subject to customary closing conditions and obtaining necessary regulatory approvals.
    • Reported net income from all portfolio investments for the first quarter of 2025 of $28.1 million (2024 – $12.6 million). Other than G Mining, the key drivers of performance during the quarter included investment gains of $4.5 million and $3.8 million in the Corporation’s investments in Ausgold Limited and Greenheart Gold Inc., respectively.
    • Reported consolidated general and administrative expenses for the first quarter of 2025 of $4.5 million (2024 – $4.1 million).
    • Reported net earnings attributable to owners of the Corporation for the first quarter of 2025 of $24.5 million (2024 – $7.2 million), or earnings per share on a diluted basis of $0.25 (2024 – $0.07 per share).

    SEGMENTED FINANCIAL RESULTS  

    Mining Investments

    In the first quarter of 2025, the Corporation reported net earnings before taxes from the mining investments segment of $29.8 million (2024 – $9.3 million). Drivers of performance are described in the highlights above. The share of income from equity accounted mining investments during the first quarter of 2025 was $0.2 million (2024 – loss of $0.5 million).

    Corporate and others

    The Corporation reported a pre-tax loss from the corporate and others segment, including non-core subsidiaries, of $4.1 million (2024 – $0.4 million) during the three months ended March 31, 2025.

    The fair value of non-mining portfolio investments in the corporate and others segment decreased by $1.4 million (2024 – increased by $2.8 million) during the first quarter of the current year and was driven almost exclusively by the investment revaluation of Dundee’s ownership in TauRx Pharmaceuticals Ltd., owing to an increase to the discount rate used to value this investment at March 31, 2025.

    During the same period, the segment’s non-mining equity accounted investments reported pre-tax earnings of $0.03 million (2024 – $0.1 million). Also, the segment’s subsidiaries reported pre-tax losses of $0.1 million (2024 – $0.6 million).

    Mining Services

    During the first quarter of 2025, the mining services segment, comprised of the Corporation’s 78%-owned subsidiary, Dundee Sustainable Technologies Inc., reported a pre-tax loss of $1.7 million (2024 – $1.2 million).

    SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY ON A PER SHARE BASIS

             
    Carrying value as at March 31, 2025     December 31, 2024  
    Mining Investments      
    Portfolio investments $ 93,649     $ 95,490  
    Equity accounted investments   31,273       30,013  
    Royalty   18,921       18,921  
          143,843       144,424  
    Corporate and Others      
    Corporate   64,253       32,976  
    Portfolio investments ‒ other   68,721       70,495  
    Equity accounted investments ‒ other         30,240  
    Real estate joint ventures   2,291       2,364  
    Subsidiaries   (106 )     3,403  
    Equity accounted investments ‒ Held-for-Sale   30,414        
          165,573       139,478  
    Mining Services      
    Subsidiaries   (535 )     (208 )
          (535 )     (208 )
    SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY ATTRIBUTABLE TO CLASS A SUBORDINATE SHARES      
    AND CLASS B SHARES OF THE CORPORATION $ 308,881     $ 283,694  
             
    Number of shares of the Corporation issued and outstanding:      
      Class A Subordinate Shares   86,305,197       86,269,735  
      Class B Shares   3,114,491       3,114,491  
    Total number of shares issued and outstanding   89,419,688       89,384,226  
             
    SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY ON A PER SHARE BASIS $ 3.45     $ 3.17  
                   

    The Corporation’s unaudited interim consolidated financial statements as at and for the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2024, along with the accompanying management’s discussion and analysis, have been filed on the System for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval (“SEDAR”) and may be viewed by interested parties under the Corporation’s profile at www.sedarplus.ca or the Corporation’s website at www.dundeecorporation.com.

    ABOUT DUNDEE CORPORATION:

    Dundee Corporation is a public Canadian independent mining-focused holding company, listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange under the symbol “DC.A”. The Corporation is primarily engaged in acquiring mineral resource assets. The Corporation operates with the objective of unlocking value through strategic investments in mining projects globally. Our team conducts due diligence in order to assess the geological, technical, environmental, and financial merits and risks of each project and looks to deploy capital where it can either seek to generate investment returns or where the Corporation can collaborate with operating partners and take strategic partnerships through direct interests in mining operations.

    FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS:

    This press release may contain forward-looking information within the meaning of applicable securities legislation, which reflects Dundee Corporation’s current expectations regarding future events. Forward-looking information is based on a number of assumptions and is subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond Dundee Corporation’s control, which could cause actual results and events to differ materially from those that are disclosed in or implied by such forward-looking information. Such risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, the factors discussed under “Risk Factors” in the Annual Information Form of Dundee Corporation and subsequent filings made with securities commissions in Canada. Dundee Corporation does not undertake any obligation to update such forward-looking information, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as expressly required by applicable law.

    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT:

    Investor and Media Relations
    T: (416) 864-3584
    E: ir@dundeecorporation.com

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI Economics: STATEMENT: CanREA eager to work with new federal Cabinet to advance wind energy, solar energy and energy storage 

    Source: – Press Release/Statement:

    Headline: STATEMENT: CanREA eager to work with new federal Cabinet to advance wind energy, solar energy and energy storage 

    CanREA ready to help Canada’s newly appointed Ministers deliver on key election promises that will advance clean-energy initiatives nationwide. 

    Ottawa, Ontario, May 13, 2025—The Canadian Renewable Energy Association (CanREA) congratulates Canada’s new federal Cabinet Ministers and Secretaries of State on their appointment to Cabinet. The Ministers were sworn in today by Her Excellency the Right Honourable Mary Simon, C.C., C.M.M., C.O.M, C.D., Governor General of Canada.  

    CanREA looks forward to supporting their delivery of an ambitious agenda for the clean-energy industry, helping Canada meet its economic and environmental goals.    

    Specifically, CanREA would like to congratulate: 

    The Hon. François-Philippe Champagne P.C. M.P., Minister of Finance and National Revenue 
    The Hon. Dominic LeBlanc P.C., M.P., President of the King’s Privy Council for Canada and Minister Responsible for Canada-U.S. Trade, Intergovernmental Affairs and One Canadian Economy  
    The Hon. Shafqat Ali P.C. M.P., President of the Treasury Board  
    The Hon. Tim Hodgson P.C. M.P., Minister of Energy and Natural Resources 
    The Hon. Julie Dabrusin P.C. M.P., Minister of Environment and Climate Change 
    The Hon. Mélanie Joly, P.C., M.P., Minister of Industry 
    The Hon. Rebecca Ally P.C., M.P. Minister of Crown-Indigenous Relations  
    The Hon. Mandy Gull-Masty P.C., M.P., Minister of Indigenous Services 

    “Over the past number of years, the CanREA team has developed a strong working relationship with the federal government,” said Vittoria Bellissimo, CanREA’s President and CEO. “My team and I are committed to advancing wind, solar and energy storage and we will work closely with Canada’s newly appointed ministers to shape and support federal policies that will be essential to our industry as we plan, finance and build clean-energy projects that benefit Canadians.”  

    During the recent election campaign, the Liberal Party committed to a suite of proposals that support the rapid deployment of clean energy, as described in this recent CanREA statement. These policies include:  

    Finalizing the Clean Economy Investment Tax Credits (ITCs), policies that have already galvanized private sector investment in Canada’s renewable energy and energy storage industry. Getting the remaining ITCs passed into law, particularly the Clean Electricity ITC, will secure Canada’s position as a competitive and safe place for the private sector to invest. These will also help lower the cost of electricity to Canadian ratepayers. 
    Reducing the barriers to accessing capital faced by Indigenous companies and communities, by expanding the kinds of projects the Canada Infrastructure Bank can support to be more in line with First Nation, Inuit and Métis priorities. The Liberals also committed to exploring options for an Indigenous Infrastructure Bank to further address this gap. 
    Offering support for Canadians entering the trades, while also helping to reduce barriers that these skilled workers face when working in another province. 
    Creating a new First and Last Mile Fund that will move more electricity and goods from where they are produced to where they are needed, creating a more integrated and accessible Canadian economy. 
    Signing new Cooperation and Substitution Agreements with all willing provinces, territories and Indigenous Governing Bodies within six months, ensuring that projects go through only one review that upholds environmental standards and Indigenous consultation. 
    Cementing the signal for electrification by maintaining the industrial carbon price. During his leadership campaign, Mr. Carney even promised to set a pricing schedule out to 2035—this would be a strong signal upon which Canada’s renewable energy and energy storage industry could rely. 

    Across the country, more than 18,000 MW of clean-energy procurements, representing more than $34 B, are being planned or currently taking place, all of which will benefit from these federal policies.   

    “The federal ITCs, along with increased Indigenous access to capital and new interprovincial interconnections, will allow Canada to maintain its competitive edge in the global race for renewable energy and energy storage investment,” said Fernando Melo, CanREA’s Federal Director of Policy and Government Affairs.  

    “Putting these in place will be no small feat, but CanREA is committed to collaborating with the federal government to get these groundbreaking policies across the finish line.” 

    Quotes

    “Over the past number of years, the CanREA team has developed a strong working relationship with the federal government. My team and I are committed to advancing wind, solar and energy storage and we will work closely with Canada’s newly appointed ministers to shape and support federal policies that will be essential to our industry as we plan, finance and build clean-energy projects that benefit Canadians.” 
    —Vittoria Bellissimo, President and CEO, Canadian Renewable Energy Association (CanREA) 

    “The federal ITCs, along with increased Indigenous access to capital and new interprovincial interconnections, will allow Canada to maintain its competitive edge in the global race for renewable energy and energy storage investment. Putting these in place will be no small feat, but CanREA is committed to collaborating with the federal government to get these groundbreaking policies across the finish line.”  
    —Fernando Melo, Federal Director, Canadian Renewable Energy Association (CanREA) 

    For interview opportunities, please contact: 

    Bridget Wayland, Senior Director of Communications  Canadian Renewable Energy Association communications@renewablesassociation.ca 

    About CanREA 

    The Canadian Renewable Energy Association (CanREA) is the voice for wind energy, solar energy and energy storage solutions that will power Canada’s energy future. We work to create the conditions for a modern energy system through stakeholder advocacy and public engagement. Our diverse members are uniquely positioned to deliver clean, low-cost, reliable, flexible and scalable solutions for Canada’s energy needs. For more information on how Canada can use wind energy, solar energy and energy storage to help achieve its net-zero commitments, consult “Powering Canada’s Journey to Net-Zero: CanREA’s 2050 Vision.” Follow us on Bluesky and LinkedIn. Subscribe to our newsletter here. Learn more at renewablesassociation.ca.    

    The post STATEMENT: CanREA eager to work with new federal Cabinet to advance wind energy, solar energy and energy storage  appeared first on Canadian Renewable Energy Association.

    MIL OSI Economics