Category: Transport

  • MIL-OSI Security: Secretary Noem Puts Sanctuary City Leaders on Notice: Time to Put Americans First

    Source: US Department of Homeland Security

     The Secretary blasted sanctuary jurisdictions for failing to uphold federal law and called on leaders to stand up for Americans who have been victimized by reckless sanctuary policies

    SPRINGFIELD, IL – Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem today held a press conference highlighting the devastation sanctuary policies have caused in Illinois and across America with Angel families who shared their tragic stories of their loved ones lost because of illegal alien crime. The Secretary also called out Illinois Governor Pritzker for shielding law breakers.

    “As Secretary of Homeland Security, I’m going to uphold our federal immigration laws,” said Secretary Kristi Noem. “I’m going to draw attention to people who are breaking the law and violating our Constitution. I’m going to fight for the victims every single day and draw attention to them as long as we can. And President Trump will continue to do that as well. We should be united as a country around bringing violent criminals to justice and getting them out of the United States of America.”

    To watch the full press conference, click here.

    Some of the Angel Families who attended the press conference include: 

    • Jim Walden, Angel Father of Lance Corporal James Ray “Jimmy” Walden III. Jimmy was killed by a twice-deported illegal alien who crashed into Jimmy’s motorcycle. He was killed in Maryland, but his father lives in Illinois.
    • Kathy Zander, Angel Mother of John Zander. Four days before his 23rd birthday, John was convinced by his best friend to snort cocaine, not knowing that his friend had spiked it with fentanyl. John died from fentanyl poisoning.
    • Brian McCann, Angel Brother of Dennis “Denny” McCann. Denny was crossing the street when he was hit by a car in Chicago’s Logan Square neighborhood and dragged to his death by an illegal alien. The driver was charged in the fatal crash, but after being released on bond, he disappeared.   
    • Nancy Platania Angel Mother of Nick Platania who tragically lost his life to a fentanyl overdose. Nick worked to get others clean from drugs and started his own business before his life was tragically taken by deadly drugs funneled into American communities. 

    There are more than 200 sanctuary jurisdictions across the nation. The following headlines are only a handful of examples of sanctuary leaders refusing to work with federal law enforcement to protect Americans. 

    New York Governor Kathy Hochul:

    Wisconsin Governor Tony Evers:

    Nashville Mayor Freddie O’Connell:

    Portland Police Chief Bob Day:

    Los Angeles Police Chief Jim McDonnell:

    Boston Police Department Commissioner Michael Cox:

    On April 28, 2025, President Donald Trump signed the Protecting American Communities from Criminal Aliens Executive Order. Under the President’s order, the Secretary of Homeland Security and the Attorney General are directed to publish a list of states and local jurisdictions that obstruct the enforcement of federal immigration laws.

    Under President Trump’s leadership, DHS will work with DOJ to end violations of federal immigration law and bring jurisdictions into compliance with the laws of the United States.

    ###

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI USA: CONGRESSWOMAN HAGEMAN INTRODUCES NO STUDENT VISAS FOR SANCTUARY CITIES ACT

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Wyoming Congresswoman Harriet Hageman

    Washington, D.C. – Earlier today Congresswoman Hageman introduced the No Student Visas for Sanctuary Cities Act, an action which will hold sanctuary cities accountable for their violation of federal law and for their aiding of illegal aliens. The bill seeks to amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to prohibit student visas for educational institutions in sanctuary jurisdictions. 

    “Leftist proponents of open borders, or no borders at all, have infiltrated many of our states, cities, and counties and caused the so- called leaders within them to completely undermine the rule of law. Instead of protecting their citizens, sanctuary city officials have chosen those here unlawfully – many of them members of international cartels and other transnational criminal organizations – over their constituents.” She stated. “Prohibiting student visas is an accountability measure to pressure obstructors of justice to take action in complying with the rules set forth by Congressional representatives of the American people.”  

    Original co-sponsors of the bill include Brandon Gill (TX-26), Paul Gosar, (AZ-9), and Troy Nehls, (TX-22).  

    This legislation fortifies the President’s Executive Order issued last week holding sanctuary cities liable for obstruction of justice.  

    ### 

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Progress on the SH1 Belfast to Pegasus Motorway and Woodend Bypass project

    Source: NZ Music Month takes to the streets

    Work is moving at pace on the State Highway 1 (SH1) Belfast to Pegasus Motorway and Woodend Bypass project, with geotech work beginning this week, Transport Minister Chris Bishop and Minister for the South Island and Associate Transport Minister James Meager say. 

    “The Government is committed to supporting the fast-growing Waimakariri District. This much needed transport infrastructure will boost economic growth, reduce congestion, improve safety and access to housing growth areas. SH1 approaching Woodend currently carries around 21,500 vehicles per day, of which nine percent is freight. The traffic volume is expected to reach 28,000 vehicles per day by 2048. There have been 280 crashes on SH1 through Woodend between 2014 and 2023, with three fatalities and 25 serious injuries,” Mr Bishop says. 

    “The NZ Transport Agency (NZTA) Board endorsed the investment case for the Belfast to Pegasus Motorway and Woodend Bypass Road of National Significance in November 2024, which proposes: 

    • Widening the southern section of the existing SH1 from two to four lanes.
    • A new four-lane motorway bypass in the northern section.
    • A grade separated interchange at the Williams Street intersection with SH1.
    • Replace the Pegasus roundabout with an overbridge and signalised intersection.
    • Kaiapoi Bridge seismic strengthening and widening.
    • Construction of new bridges over the Cam River and overbridges at Woodend Beach Road and Gladstone Road.
    • Tolling to support the construction and maintenance of the road. 

    “In addition to endorsing the investment case in November last year, the NZTA Board also approved $68.1 million in initial funding to complete detailed design work and advance an early works package, as well as around $37 million for property acquisition. Further funding to begin and complete main construction will be considered by the NZTA Board in due course. 

    “Delivering this project has substantial benefits, including a three-minute travel time saving along the state highway, and up to 10 minutes at peak. It is also expected to reduce traffic through Woodend from 21,000 vehicles per day to 8,000, and a reduction in deaths and serious injuries from 5.6 to 1.25 per year. 

    “The investment case endorsed by the NZTA Board sets an investment envelope between $800 million and $1 billion to design, consent, and construct the project. 

    “The Government Policy Statement on Land Transport 2024 (GPS) requires NZTA to consider tolling for all new RoNS. The investment case confirms tolling is possible and the revenue will support the construction and maintenance of the road. The Government will consider this recommendation and announce next steps of the process in due course.” 

    “NZTA is continuing to move at pace on the project with the detailed design contract awarded to Aurecon and Tonkin + Taylor in March this year. Getting geotech works underway is an essential part of the design phase of the project and will involve drilling around 70 boreholes up to 35 metres deep and digging pits at individual sites within the construction area,” Mr Meager says. 

    “The geotechnical investigations will look at ground conditions, including soil and rock types, groundwater depths and the strength of soil and rock. This work will take around two months to complete. 

    “Once geotechnical data is available, NZTA will confirm the scope and design of an early works package and prepare and lodge consent applications. The early works package will likely begin in early 2026, while main construction is likely to begin later in 2026. The project is expected to take four years to complete. 

    “SH1 is a nationally strategic freight route and provides critical access to Christchurch City, Christchurch International Airport, Lyttelton Port, and the major health, education, commercial and industrial services in the Canterbury region. Delivering the Belfast to Pegasus Motorway and Woodend Bypass Road of National Significance will significantly improve reliability of the corridor and ensure people and freight can get where they need to go, quickly and safely. 

    “I want to thank local Waimakariri MP Matt Doocey, Banks Peninsula MP Vanessa Weenink, Kaikoura MP Stuart Smith and Mayor Dan Gordon who have been a staunch advocates of this project, as well as wider Canterbury MPs Hamish Campbell and Nicola Grigg. I know we’re all looking forward to seeing more progress in the months and years ahead as we move into construction as soon as possible.” 

    For more information about the project, you can visit the NZTA website here: https://www.nzta.govt.nz/projects/sh1-belfast-to-pegasus-motorway-and-woodend-bypass/

    MIL OSI New Zealand News

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Police acknowledge IPCA findings on vehicle seizures

    Source: New Zealand Police

    Please attribute to Relieving Wellington District Commander Inspector Lincoln Sycamore:

    Police acknowledge the findings by the Independent Police Conduct Authority (IPCA) regarding four complaints against Wellington Police officers obtaining a warrant and seizing vehicles for unpaid fines in 2022 and 2023.

    The incidents occurred following the start of ‘Operation Cobalt’, a nationwide effort by Police to target and disrupt illegal gang activity. As part of this operation, Police staff would apply for warrants to seize property belonging to gang members with unpaid fines.

    Police have reviewed the policy and practice regarding obtaining a warrant to seize property for unpaid fines and have addressed the recommendation made by the IPCA.

    In March 2024, we updated our search instructions for officers to ensure they are aware of and understand their obligations. Officers are required to have Ministry of Justice bailiffs present at the search location, unless there is urgency and or good reason for Police to execute the warrant as part of a major event operation or criminal investigation.

    We also agree with the second recommendation made by the IPCA and have already begun the process to engage with Ministry of Justice to update an internal form used by officers. This will ensure the form accurately reflects the scope of the search and seizure power under section 99 of the Summary Proceedings Act 1957.

    ENDS

    Issued by Police Media Centre

    MIL OSI New Zealand News

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: NZ Treasury – Interim Financial Statements of the Government of New Zealand for the nine months ended 31 March 2025

    Source: The New Zealand Treasury

    The Interim Financial Statements of the Government of New Zealand for the nine months ended 31 March 2025 were released by the Treasury today. The March results are reported against forecasts based on the Half Year Economic and Fiscal Update 2024 (HYEFU 2024), published on 17 December 2024, and the results for the same period for the previous year.

    The majority of the key fiscal indicators for the nine months ended 31 March 2025 were better than forecast. The Government’s main operating indicator, the operating balance before gains and losses excluding ACC (OBEGALx), showed a deficit of $6.6 billion. This was $0.5 billion smaller than forecast largely due to lower than forecast core Crown expenditure. Net core Crown debt was $2.1 billion lower than forecast at $182.0 billion, or 42.6% of GDP.

    Core Crown tax revenue, at $89.5 billion, was $0.2 billion (0.2%) higher than forecast. While GST and other individuals’ tax were both above forecast by $0.5 billion each, this was broadly offset by source deductions and corporate tax which were below forecast by $0.5 billion and $0.3 billion, respectively.

    Core Crown expenses, at $104.1 billion, were $0.6 billion (0.5%) below forecast. This variance included some significant offsetting variances and was mostly timing in nature. In particular, core government services expenses were $0.6 billion above forecast, while transport and housing expenses were $0.6 billion and $0.3 billion below forecast, respectively. The remaining variance was spread across a range of agencies.

    The OBEGALx was a deficit of $6.6 billion, $0.5 billion less than the forecast deficit. When including the revenue and expenses of ACC, the OBEGAL deficit was $8.4 billion, $0.4 billion less than the forecast deficit.

    The operating balance deficit of $4.5 billion was $0.8 billion higher than the forecast deficit. This reflected net unfavourable valuation movements along with the favourable OBEGAL result. Net gains on financial instruments were $4.0 billion lower than forecast, driven by the performance of the New Zealand Superannuation Fund (NZS Fund) and ACC’s investment portfolios. This unfavourable variance was partly offset by net losses on non-financial instruments being $2.6 billion less than forecast. This was largely owing to a $0.7 billion net actuarial gain on ACC’s outstanding claims liability compared to a forecast net loss of $1.0 billion, and the New Zealand Emissions Trading Scheme with net losses being $0.9 billion lower than forecast.

    The core Crown residual cash deficit of $5.3 billion was $1.7 billion lower than forecast. While net operating cash flows were broadly in line with forecast, net core Crown capital cash outflows were $1.5 billion lower than forecast. This variance is expected to be timing in nature, mainly owing to net purchases of investments and net increases in advances which were both below forecast by $0.6 billion and $0.7 billion, respectively.

    Net core Crown debt at $182.0 billion (42.6% of GDP) was $2.1 billion lower than forecast. This variance was largely due to the variance in core Crown residual cash deficit and the factors not impacting residual cash which improved net core Crown debt. Of these factors, the most significant was foreign exchange movements since the HYEFU 2024 forecast which have resulted in $0.5 billion of net gains improving net core Crown debt without impacting the core Crown residual cash indicator.

    Gross debt at $206.0 billion (48.3% of GDP) was $0.5 billion higher than forecast, largely owing to higher than forecast government stock, partially offset by lower than forecast Treasury bills.

    Net worth at $183.8 billion (43.1% of GDP) was $0.3 billion lower than forecast. The variance to forecast reflects a higher operating balance deficit discussed above, partially offset by net actuarial gains on retirement plan schemes ($0.5 billion). Net worth consisted of total Crown assets of $594.7 billion (in line with forecast) and total Crown liabilities of $410.9 billion ($0.3 billion higher than forecast).


          

      Year to date Full Year
    March
    2025
    Actual1
    $m
    March 
    2025
    HYEFU 2024
    Forecast1
    $m
    Variance2
    HYEFU 2024
    $m
    Variance
    HYEFU 2024
    %
    June
    2025
    HYEFU 2024
    Forecast3
    $m
    Core Crown tax revenue 89,478 89,278 200 0.2 120,623
    Core Crown revenue 99,124 99,152 (28) –  134,038
    Core Crown expenses 104,088 104,662 574 0.5 144,638
    Core Crown residual cash (5,297) (7,018) 1,721 24.5 (16,610)
    Net core Crown debt4 181,984 184,121 2,137 1.2 192,810
              as a percentage of GDP 42.6% 43.1%     45.1%
    Gross debt 205,997 205,456 (541) (0.3) 206,558
              as a percentage of GDP 48.3% 48.1%     48.3%
    OBEGAL excluding ACC (OBEGALx) (6,589) (7,118) 529 7.4 (12,868)
    OBEGAL (8,370) (8,774) 404 4.6 (17,317)
    Operating balance (excluding minority interests) (4,484) (3,656) (828) (22.6) (10,161)
    Net worth 183,815 184,118 (303) (0.2) 177,492
              as a percentage of GDP 43.1% 43.1%     41.5%
    1. Using the most recently published GDP (for the year ended 31 December 2024) of $426,925 million (Source: Stats NZ).
    2. Favourable variances against forecast have a positive sign and unfavourable variances against forecast have a negative sign.
    3. Using HYEFU 2024 forecast GDP for the year ending 30 June 2025 of $427,252 million (Source: The Treasury).
    4. Net core Crown debt excludes the NZS Fund and core Crown advances. Net core Crown debt may fluctuate during the year largely reflecting the timing of tax receipts.

    MIL OSI New Zealand News

  • MIL-OSI USA: AG Brown co-leads states suing to stop illegal termination of federal electric vehicle infrastructure funding

    Source: Washington State News

    SEATTLE — Washington is co-leading a lawsuit to stop the Trump administration from illegally terminating billions in congressionally approved funding for electric vehicle infrastructure – including a combined $1 billion in the plaintiff states, Attorney General Nick Brown announced today. Unless the courts check the president’s overreach, Washington stands to lose over $71 million in electric vehicle infrastructure funding.

    “The president’s illegal claw-backs aren’t spending reductions – they’re cash grabs that rob taxpayers, steamroll Congress, and stifle critical economic development,” Brown said. “Washingtonians are switching to electric vehicles at one of the highest rates in the nation. They deserve safe, reliable infrastructure to get their families from Point A to B.”

    The 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, also known as the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, passed by Congress appropriated $5 billion for the National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Formula Program, or the NEVI program, to fund states’ nationwide deployment of electric vehicle charging infrastructure to improve reliability and accessibility for the public.

    On Jan. 20, President Trump mandated federal agencies pause disbursement of all funds appropriated under the IIJA and the Inflation Reduction Act, including NEVI program funding. Despite being mandated by Congress to fund the NEVI program, the Federal Highway Administration notified states in February the agency was unlawfully revoking previous state plan approvals and withholding or withdrawing NEVI program funds from the states.

    Washington is a national leader in electric vehicle use, remaining in the top five states for electric vehicle adoption for more than a decade. The electric vehicle transition is critical to the success of Washington’s plans to cut transportation-related pollution.

    Transportation is the largest source of carbon pollution in Washington. Vehicle pollution causes health problems, such as cancer and asthma, and contributes to climate change. To combat climate change and protect the health of its residents, Washington has adopted zero-emission vehicle standards that require a percentage of the vehicles sold in Washington to be zero emission, starting with the 2025 model year.

    The state also has vehicle emissions standards that require all new passenger cars, light-duty trucks, and medium-duty vehicles sold in Washington be zero emission by 2035. The state has proactively invested in EV charging infrastructure for many years, but Washington’s ability to make this transition and meet its own statutory requirements is significantly hampered by the FHWA’s indefinite withholding of the NEVI program funds Congress directed to the state.

    The lawsuit filed today by Brown and 16 other attorneys general seeks a court order against FHWA’s unlawful actions, and a restoration of the electric vehicle infrastructure funding for the states.

    Brown is co-leading this lawsuit with California and Colorado. They are joined by the attorneys general of Arizona, Delaware, the District of Columbia, Hawaii, Illinois, Maryland, Minnesota, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Wisconsin.

    A copy of the complaint is available here and a copy of the motion for a preliminary injunction is here.

    -30-

    Washington’s Attorney General serves the people and the state of Washington. As the state’s largest law firm, the Attorney General’s Office provides legal representation to every state agency, board, and commission in Washington. Additionally, the Office serves the people directly by enforcing consumer protection, civil rights, and environmental protection laws. The Office also prosecutes elder abuse, Medicaid fraud, and handles sexually violent predator cases in 38 of Washington’s 39 counties.

    Visit www.atg.wa.gov to learn more.

    Media Contact:

    Email: press@atg.wa.gov

    Phone: (360) 753-2727

    General contacts: Click here

    Media Resource Guide & Attorney General’s Office FAQ

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI: Oportun Announces Continued Board Evolution

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    SAN CARLOS, Calif., May 07, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Oportun (Nasdaq: OPRT), a mission-driven financial services company, today announced that its Board of Directors will nominate Carlos Minetti and Raul Vazquez for election at the Company’s 2025 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the “Annual Meeting”). Scott Parker and R. Neil Williams will not stand for reelection at the Annual Meeting, and the Board will be reduced from ten to eight members at that time. If the Board’s recommended candidates are elected, three of the Board’s seven independent directors will have joined the Board within eighteen months of the Annual Meeting. Following the conclusion of Mr. Williams’ tenure on the Board, the Board will select a new Lead Independent Director.

    “The Board has thoughtfully repositioned Oportun for continued success. As part of that process, we took a comprehensive look at how to maintain the Board’s strength and independence, as well as its diversity of experience and expertise,” said Mr. Williams. “After benchmarking against industry peers and corporate governance best practices, and considering the perspectives of our shareholders, we recognized that a smaller Board would be both more conventional and efficient. I have full confidence the Board will continue to provide effective guidance and hold management accountable as the Company executes its strategic initiatives.”

    “On behalf of the Board, I’d like to thank Scott and Neil for their service and contributions to the Company. We wish them all the best in their future endeavors,” said Ginny Lee, Chair of the Nominating, Governance and Social Responsibility Committee. “Looking ahead, we remain focused on vigorous and independent oversight of the Company’s strategy and execution, with a goal of driving improved operating performance and delivering enhanced shareholder value.”

    About Oportun

    Oportun (Nasdaq: OPRT) is a mission-driven financial services company that puts its members’ financial goals within reach. With intelligent borrowing, savings, and budgeting capabilities, Oportun empowers members with the confidence to build a better financial future. Since inception, Oportun has provided more than $19.7 billion in responsible and affordable credit, saved its members more than $2.4 billion in interest and fees, and helped its members save an average of more than $1,800 annually. For more information, visit Oportun.com.

    Forward-Looking Statements

    This press release contains forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are subject to the safe harbor provisions under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. All statements other than statements of historical fact contained in this press release, including statements as to our future performance and financial position, are forward-looking statements. These statements can be generally identified by terms such as “expect,” “plan,” “goal,” “target,” “anticipate,” “assume,” “predict,” “project,” “outlook,” “continue,” “due,” “may,” “believe,” “seek,” or “estimate” and similar expressions or the negative versions of these words or comparable words, as well as future or conditional verbs such as “will,” “should,” “would,” “likely” and “could.” These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, assumptions and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. We have based these forward-looking statements on our current expectations and projections about future events, financial trends and risks and uncertainties that we believe may affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. These risks and uncertainties include those risks described in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including our most recent annual report on Form 10-K. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on which they are made and, except to the extent required by federal securities laws, we disclaim any obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which the statement is made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. In light of these risks and uncertainties, there is no assurance that the events or results suggested by the forward-looking statements will in fact occur, and you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements.

    Additional Information and Where to Find It

    Oportun Financial Corporation (“Oportun”), its directors and certain executive officers are participants in the solicitation of proxies from stockholders in connection with Oportun’s 2025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”). Oportun plans to file a proxy statement (the “2025 Proxy Statement”) with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) in connection with the solicitation of proxies for the Annual Meeting.

    Jo Ann Barefoot, Mohit Daswani, Ginny Lee, Carlos Minetti, Louis Miramontes, Scott Parker, Sandra A. Smith, Richard Tambor, Raul Vazquez and R. Neil Williams, all of whom are members of Oportun’s board of directors, are participants in Oportun’s solicitation. Additional information regarding such participants, including their direct or indirect interests, by security holdings or otherwise, will be included in the 2025 Proxy Statement and other relevant documents to be filed with the SEC in connection with the Annual Meeting. Information relating to the foregoing can also be found in Oportun’s definitive proxy statement for its 2024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “2024 Proxy Statement”), which was filed with the SEC on May 13, 2024, and is available here. Particular attention is directed to the sections of the 2024 Proxy Statement captioned “Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance,” “Non-Employee Director Compensation,” “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters,” “Executive Compensation” and “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.” To the extent that holdings of such participants in Oportun’s securities have changed since the amounts printed in the 2024 Proxy Statement, such changes have been reflected on the following filings: for Ms. Barefoot, on June 28, 2024; for Mr. Daswani, on June 28, 2024 and December 13, 2024; for Ms. Lee, on June 28, 2024; for Mr. Minetti, on June 28, 2024 and December 13, 2024; for Mr. Miramontes, on June 28, 2024; for Mr. Parker, on April 25, 2024June 18, 2024, and June 28, 2024; for Ms. Smith, on June 28, 2024; for Mr. Tambor, on June 28, 2024 and June 28, 2024; for Mr. Vazquez, on June 18, 2024September 12, 2024December 2, 2024March 12, 2025, and April 4, 2025; and for Mr. Williams, on June 28, 2024 and December 11, 2024.

    Promptly after filing its definitive 2025 Proxy Statement with the SEC, Oportun will mail the definitive 2025 Proxy Statement and a GREEN proxy card to each stockholder entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. STOCKHOLDERS ARE URGED TO READ THE 2025 PROXY STATEMENT (INCLUDING ANY AMENDMENTS OR SUPPLEMENTS THERETO) AND ANY OTHER RELEVANT DOCUMENTS THAT OPORTUN WILL FILE WITH THE SEC WHEN THEY BECOME AVAILABLE BECAUSE THEY WILL CONTAIN IMPORTANT INFORMATION. Stockholders may obtain, free of charge, Oportun’s proxy statement (in both preliminary and definitive form), any amendments or supplements thereto, and any other relevant documents filed by Oportun with the SEC in connection with the Annual Meeting at the SEC’s website, which is located here. Copies of Oportun’s definitive 2025 Proxy Statement, any amendments or supplements thereto, and any other relevant documents filed by Oportun with the SEC in connection with the Annual Meeting will also be available, free of charge, at Oportun’s website, which is located here, or by writing to Investor Relations, Oportun Financial Corporation, 2 Circle Star Way, San Carlos, CA 94070. In addition, copies of these materials may be requested, free of charge, from Oportun’s proxy solicitor, Innisfree M&A Incorporated, by calling toll-free to (877) 800-5195.

    Investor Contact
    Dorian Hare
    (650) 590-4323
    ir@oportun.com

    Innisfree M&A Incorporated
    Scott Winter / Gabrielle Wolf / Jonathan Kovacs
    (212) 750-5833

    Media Contact
    John Christiansen / Bryan Locke
    FGS Global
    Oportun@fgsglobal.com

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI: Petrus Resources Announces First Quarter 2025 Financial and Operating Results

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    CALGARY, Alberta, May 07, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Petrus Resources Ltd. (“Petrus” or the “Company”) (TSX: PRQ) is pleased to report financial and operating results as at and for the three months ended March 31, 2025.

    Q1 2025 HIGHLIGHTS:

    • Capital Activity – Invested $17.3 million in capital during the quarter. Approximately 60% was directed toward the drilling, completing and tie-in of 7 gross (4.1 net) wells. Most of the remaining capital expenditures went to the construction of a 12-kilometer expansion of the North Ferrier pipeline, an infrastructure investment designed to enhance access to high quality undeveloped lands and enable cost-effective transportation of natural gas to Petrus’ operated Ferrier gas plant. Of the wells drilled in the quarter, 5 will flow through the North Ferrier pipeline.
    • Production – Average production was 8,929 boe/d(1) in the first quarter of 2025, relatively flat compared to 9,066 boe/d in the fourth quarter of 2024.
    • Commodity Prices – Total realized price was $29.35/boe, up 11% from $26.45/boe in the fourth quarter of 2024, primarily due to improved natural gas pricing.
    • Funds Flow(2) Generated funds flow of $12.5 million ($0.10 per share(3)) in the first quarter of 2025, solidifying the gains realized in the fourth quarter of 2024.
    • Dividends – Paid regular monthly dividend of $0.01 per share, for a total of $3.8 million, during the first quarter of 2025. Shareholders chose to reinvest $2.6 million under the Company’s dividend reinvestment plan resulting in the issue of 2,005,522 common shares.
    • Net Debt(2) Net debt increased to $66.0 million as at March 31, 2025, and net debt to annualized funds flow ratio(3) increased to 1.3x. This increase was due to high capital spending in Q1, which was required to take advantage of time-sensitive strategic opportunities. Net debt is expected to decline in the second half of the year and is forecast to return to our 2025 guidance target of $60 million by year-end.

    OUTLOOK(4)

    The 2025 capital program began early in the year and remains on schedule. Drilling operations are continuing through spring breakup. Completion activities on the remaining uncompleted first quarter wells are under way and production is expected to come online later in May. The 12 kilometer North Ferrier pipeline extension is expected to be operational in May with both Petrus and third-party volumes flowing to the Ferrier gas plant.

    For the remainder of 2025, Petrus has hedged approximately 56% of its forecasted production at an average price of $2.67/GJ for natural gas and CAD$94.75/bbl for oil. This strategic approach positions the Company to achieve its guidance targets and maintain financial stability. As always, Petrus is prepared to adapt its capital program in response to market dynamics, remaining focused on delivering sustainable returns to shareholders.

    FIRST QUARTER 2025 CONFERENCE CALL

    Date and Time: May 8, 2025, 11:00 a.m. (Mountain Time)
    Please refer to the events page on Petrus’ website for conference call details and links: www.petrusresources.com/events

    ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING
    The Company’s Annual General Meeting will be held at Suite #1110, 240 4th Ave SW Calgary, Alberta, on Wednesday May 21, 2025 at 1:30 p.m. (Mountain Time).
    Please refer to the events page on Petrus’ website for AGM details and links: www.petrusresources.com/events

    An updated corporate presentation can be found on the Company’s website at www.petrusresources.com

    For further information, please contact:
    Ken Gray, P.Eng.
    President and Chief Executive Officer
    T: (403) 930-0889
    E: kgray@petrusresources.com

    (1)Disclosure of production on a per boe basis consists of the constituent product types and their respective quantities. Refer to “BOE Presentation” and “Production and Product Type Information” for further details.
    (2)Non-GAAP financial measure. Refer to “Non-GAAP and Other Financial Measures”.
    (3)Non-GAAP ratio. Refer to “Non-GAAP and Other Financial Measures”.
    (4)Refer to “Advisories – Forward-Looking Statements”.

    SELECTED FINANCIAL INFORMATION

    OPERATIONS Three months ended

    Mar. 31, 2025

    Three months ended

    Mar. 31, 2024

    Three months ended

    Dec. 31, 2024

    Three months ended

    Sept. 30, 2024

    Three months ended

    Jun. 30, 2024

    Average Production          
    Natural gas (mcf/d) 35,689   40,174   36,178   37,368   38,908  
    Oil and condensate(1) (bbl/d) 1,202   1,529   1,226   1,522   1,322  
    NGLs (bbl/d) 1,777   1,557   1,810   1,464   1,664  
    Total (boe/d) 8,929   9,783   9,066   9,215   9,471  
    Total (boe)(1) 803,498   890,267   834,111   847,760   861,838  
    Liquids weighting 33 % 32 % 33 % 32 % 32 %
    Realized Prices          
    Natural gas ($/mcf) 2.25   2.54   1.61   0.80   1.41  
    Oil and condensate(1)($/bbl) 92.73   90.38   93.60   90.80   103.77  
    NGLs ($/bbl) 39.54   43.09   36.90   36.81   37.25  
    Total realized price ($/boe) 29.35   31.42   26.45   24.07   26.81  
    Royalty income 0.06   0.07   0.03   0.05   0.05  
    Royalty expense (3.36 ) (3.89 ) (3.85 ) (3.06 ) (3.83 )
    Net oil and natural gas revenue ($/boe) 26.05   27.60   22.63   21.06   23.03  
    Operating expense (6.76 ) (6.76 ) (5.89 ) (6.10 ) (4.96 )
    Transportation expense (1.65 ) (1.81 ) (1.44 ) (1.46 ) (1.46 )
    Operating netback(2)($/boe) 17.64   19.03   15.30   13.50   16.61  
    Realized gain (loss) on financial derivatives 1.14   2.90   3.04   2.49   (0.36 )
    Other income (cash) 0.02   0.05   1.19   0.09   0.05  
    General & administrative expense (1.41 ) (1.32 ) (2.10 ) (1.43 ) (1.34 )
    Cash finance expense (1.68 ) (1.78 ) (1.83 ) (1.95 ) (1.91 )
    Decommissioning expenditures (0.19 ) (0.61 ) (0.61 ) (0.12 ) (0.72 )
    Funds flow & corporate netback ($/boe)(2) 15.52   18.27   14.99   12.58   12.33  
               
    FINANCIAL (000s except $ per share) Three months ended

    Mar. 31, 2025

    Three months ended

    Mar. 31, 2024

    Three months ended

    Dec. 31, 2024

    Three months ended

    Sept. 30, 2024

    Three months ended

    Jun. 30, 2024

    Oil and natural gas sales 23,630   28,039   22,085   20,446   23,150  
    Net income (loss) (3,088 ) (5,333 ) (4,004 ) 5,302   2,789  
    Net income (loss) per share          
    Basic (0.02 ) (0.04 ) (0.03 ) 0.04   0.02  
    Fully diluted (0.02 ) (0.04 ) (0.03 ) 0.04   0.02  
    Funds flow(2) 12,467   16,272   12,493   10,665   10,628  
    Funds flow per share(2)          
    Basic 0.10   0.13   0.10   0.09   0.09  
    Fully diluted 0.10   0.13   0.10   0.08   0.08  
    Capital expenditures 17,279   12,343   7,705   4,859   6,907  
    Weighted average shares outstanding          
    Basic 126,043   124,299   124,497   124,372   124,290  
    Fully diluted 126,043   124,299   124,497   126,686   126,559  
    As at period end          
    Common shares outstanding          
    Basic 127,469   124,259   125,113   124,372   124,372  
    Fully diluted 138,501   134,484   134,919   134,952   134,919  
    Total assets 427,955   427,574   420,124   421,196   419,584  
    Non-current liabilities 68,176   59,995   65,475   62,869   59,511  
    Net debt(2) 66,009   63,114   60,080   60,423   61,848  

    (1)Disclosure of production on a per boe basis consists of the constituent product types and their respective quantities. Refer to “BOE Presentation” and “Production and Product Type Information” for further details.
    (2)Non-GAAP ratio or non-GAAP financial measure. Refer to “Non-GAAP and Other Financial Measures”.

    NON-GAAP AND OTHER FINANCIAL MEASURES

    This press release makes reference to the terms “operating netback” (on an absolute and $/boe basis), “corporate netback” (on an absolute and $/boe basis), “funds flow” (on an absolute, per share (basic and fully diluted) and $/boe basis), “net debt” and “net debt to annualized funds flow ratio”. These non-GAAP and other financial measures are not recognized measures under GAAP (IFRS) and do not have a standardized meaning prescribed by GAAP (IFRS). Accordingly, the Company’s use of these terms may not be comparable to similarly defined measures presented by other companies. These non-GAAP and other financial measures should not be considered to be more meaningful than GAAP measures which are determined in accordance with IFRS as indicators of our performance. Management uses these non-GAAP and other financial measures for the reasons set forth below.

    Operating Netback
    Operating netback is a common non-GAAP financial measure used in the oil and natural gas industry which is a useful supplemental measure to evaluate the specific operating performance by product type at the oil and natural gas lease level. The most directly comparable GAAP measure to operating netback is oil and natural gas sales. Operating netback is calculated as oil and natural gas sales less royalty expenses, operating expenses and transportation expenses, plus or minus the gain (loss) on risk management activities. See below for a reconciliation of operating netback to oil and natural gas sales.

    Operating netback ($/boe) is a non-GAAP ratio used in the oil and natural gas industry which is a useful supplemental measure to evaluate the specific operating performance by product type at the oil and natural gas lease level. It is calculated as operating netbacks divided by weighted average daily production on a per boe basis. See below.

    Corporate Netback and Funds Flow
    Corporate netback or funds flow is a common non-GAAP financial measure used in the oil and natural gas industry which evaluates the Company’s profitability at the corporate level. Corporate netback and funds flow are used interchangeably. Petrus analyzes these measures on an absolute value and on a per unit (boe) and per share (basic and fully diluted) basis as non-GAAP ratios. Management believes that funds flow and corporate netback provide information to assist a reader in understanding the Company’s profitability relative to current commodity prices. They are calculated as the operating netback less general and administrative expense, less cash finance expense, less decommissioning expenditures, plus or minus other income (cash) and plus or minus the net realized gain (loss) on financial derivatives . See below for a reconciliation of funds flow and corporate netback to oil and natural gas sales.

    Corporate netback ($/boe) or funds flow ($/boe) is a non-GAAP ratio used in the oil and natural gas industry which evaluates the Company’s profitability at the corporate level. Management believes that funds flow ($/boe) or corporate netback ($/boe) provide information to assist a reader in understanding the Company’s profitability relative to current commodity prices. It is calculated as corporate netbacks or funds flow divided by weighted average daily production on a per boe basis. See below.

    Funds flow per share (basic and fully diluted) is comprised of funds flow divided by basic or fully diluted weighted average common shares outstanding.

      Three months ended

     March 31, 2025

    Three months ended

    Dec. 31, 2024

    Three months ended

    Sept. 30, 2024

    Three months ended

    Jun. 30, 2024

    Three months ended

    March 31, 2024

      $000s $/boe $000s $/boe $000s $/boe $000s $/boe $000s $/boe
    Oil and natural gas sales 23,630   29.41   22,085   26.48   20,446   24.12   23,150   26.86   28,039   31.50  
    Royalty expense (2,703 ) (3.36 ) (3,212 ) (3.85 ) (2,593 ) (3.06 ) (3,305 ) (3.83 ) (3,461 ) (3.89 )
    Net oil and natural gas revenue 20,927   26.05   18,873   22.63   17,853   21.06   19,845   23.03   24,578   27.61  
    Transportation expense (1,324 ) (1.65 ) (1,203 ) (1.44 ) (1,239 ) (1.46 ) (1,259 ) (1.46 ) (1,615 ) (1.81 )
    Operating expense (5,429 ) (6.76 ) (4,915 ) (5.89 ) (5,172 ) (6.10 ) (4,271 ) (4.96 ) (6,018 ) (6.76 )
    Operating netback 14,174   17.64   12,755   15.30   11,442   13.50   14,315   16.61   16,945   19.03  
    Realized gain (loss) on financial derivatives 912   1.14   2,539   3.04   2,115   2.49   (307 ) (0.36 ) 2,583   2.90  
    Other income(1) 17   0.02   991   1.19   77   0.09   40   0.05   48   0.05  
    General & administrative expense (1,133 ) (1.41 ) (1,752 ) (2.10 ) (1,209 ) (1.43 ) (1,152 ) (1.34 ) (1,178 ) (1.32 )
    Cash finance expense (1,351 ) (1.68 ) (1,530 ) (1.83 ) (1,657 ) (1.95 ) (1,650 ) (1.91 ) (1,581 ) (1.78 )
    Decommissioning expenditures (152 ) (0.19 ) (510 ) (0.61 ) (103 ) (0.12 ) (618 ) (0.72 ) (545 ) (0.61 )
    Funds flow and corporate netback 12,467   15.52   12,493   14.99   10,665   12.58   10,628   12.33   16,272   18.27  

    (1)Excludes non-cash government grant related to decommissioning expenditures.

    Net Debt

    Net debt is a non-GAAP financial measure and is calculated as the sum of long term debt and working capital (current assets and current liabilities), excluding the current financial derivative contracts and current portion of the lease obligation and decommissioning obligation. Petrus uses net debt as a key indicator of its leverage and strength of its balance sheet. Net debt is reconciled, in the table below, to long-term debt which is the most directly comparable GAAP measure.

    ($000s) As at March 31, 2025 As at Dec. 31, 2024 As at Sept. 30, 2024 As at Jun. 30, 2024 As at Mar. 31, 2024
    Long-term debt 25,000   25,000   25,000   25,000   25,000  
    Current assets (15,763 ) (17,583 ) (20,258 ) (16,333 ) (21,081 )
    Current liabilities 59,788   51,268   48,458   52,379   61,099  
    Current financial derivatives (1,779 ) 2,632   7,690   1,276   (716 )
    Current portion of lease obligation (164 ) (164 ) (230 ) (237 ) (263 )
    Current portion of decommissioning liabilities (1,073 ) (1,073 ) (237 ) (237 ) (925 )
    Net debt 66,009   60,080   60,423   61,848   63,114  


    Net Debt to annualized funds flow ratio

    Net debt to annualized funds flow ratio is a non-GAAP ratio because each of its components is a non-GAAP financial measure. This non-GAAP ratio is used by management as a key indicator of our leverage and the strength of our balance sheet. It is calculated by dividing our net debt at the end of the quarter by the funds flow for the quarter after it is annualized by multiplying it by four. Net debt to annualized fund flow ratio is not a standardized measure and, therefore, may not be comparable with the calculation of similar measures by other entities.

    ADVISORIES

    Basis of Presentation
    Financial data presented above has largely been derived from the Company’s financial statements, prepared in accordance with GAAP which require publicly accountable enterprises to prepare their financial statements using IFRS. Accounting policies adopted by the Company are set out in the notes to the audited consolidated financial statements as at and for the year ended December 31, 2024. The reporting and the measurement currency is the Canadian dollar. All financial information is expressed in Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated.

    Forward-Looking Statements
    Certain information regarding Petrus set forth in this press release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of applicable securities law, that involve substantial known and unknown risks and uncertainties. The use of any of the words “anticipate”, “continue”, “estimate”, “expect”, “may”, “will”, “project”, “should”, “believe” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Such statements represent Petrus’ internal projections, estimates, beliefs, plans, objectives, assumptions, intentions or statements about future events or performance. These statements are only predictions and actual events or results may differ materially. Although Petrus believes that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, it cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievement since such expectations are inherently subject to significant business, economic, competitive, political and social uncertainties and contingencies. Many factors could cause Petrus’ actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in any forward-looking statements made by, or on behalf of, Petrus.

    In particular, forward-looking statements included in this press release include, but are not limited to, statements with respect to: that the investment in the 12-kilometer expansion of the North Ferrier pipeline will enhance access to high quality undeveloped lands and enable cost-effective transportation of natural gas to Petrus’ operated Ferrier gas plant; that 5 of the wells drilled in the quarter will flow through the North Ferrier pipeline; that the completion activities on the uncompleted first quarter wells will begin in May and the anticipated timing of production coming on line; that the 12 kilometer North Ferrier pipeline extension will be operational in May and the anticipated timing and benefits therefrom; that our net debt is expected to decline in the second half of the year and is forecasted to return to our 2025 guidance target of $60 million by year-end; that with our current hedges for 2025, we are positioned to achieve guidance targets and maintain financial stability; that we are able to adjust our capital program in response to market dynamics; and that we are able to remain focused on delivering sustainable returns to shareholders.

    These forward-looking statements are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, most of which are beyond the Company’s control, including: the risk that (i) the tariffs that are currently in effect on goods exported from or imported into Canada continue in effect for an extended period of time, the tariffs that have been threatened are implemented, that tariffs that are currently suspended are reactivated, the rate or scope of tariffs are increased, or new tariffs are imposed, including on oil and natural gas, (ii) the U.S. and/or Canada imposes any other form of tax, restriction or prohibition on the import or export of products from one country to the other, including on oil and natural gas, and (iii) the tariffs imposed or threatened to be imposed by the U.S. on other countries and retaliatory tariffs imposed or threatened to be imposed by other countries on the U.S., will trigger a broader global trade war which could have a material adverse effect on the Canadian, U.S. and global economies, and by extension the Canadian oil and natural gas industry and the Company, including by decreasing demand for (and the price of) oil and natural gas, disrupting supply chains, increasing costs, causing volatility in global financial markets, and limiting access to financing; the impact of general economic conditions; volatility in market prices for crude oil, NGL and natural gas; industry conditions; currency fluctuation; changes in interest rates and inflation rates; imprecision of reserve estimates; liabilities inherent in crude oil and natural gas operations; environmental risks; incorrect assessments of the value of acquisitions and exploration and development programs; competition; the lack of availability of qualified personnel or management; changes in income tax laws or changes in tax laws and incentive programs relating to the oil and gas industry; hazards such as fire, explosion, blowouts, cratering, and spills, each of which could result in substantial damage to wells, production facilities, other property and the environment or in personal injury and/or increase our costs, decrease our production, or otherwise impede our ability to operate our business; extreme weather events, such as wild fires, floods, drought and extreme cold or warm temperatures, each of which could result in substantial damage to our assets and/or increase our costs, decrease our production, or otherwise impede our ability to operate our business; stock market volatility; ability to access sufficient capital from internal and external sources; that the amount of dividends that we pay may be reduced or suspended entirely; that we reduce or suspend the repurchase of shares under our NCIB; and the other risks and uncertainties described in our most recently filed annual information form. With respect to forward-looking statements contained in this press release, Petrus has made assumptions regarding: the duration and impact of tariffs that are currently in effect on goods exported from or imported into Canada, and that other than the tariffs that are currently in effect, neither the U.S. nor Canada (i) increases the rate or scope of such tariffs, reenacts tariffs that are currently suspended, or imposes new tariffs, on the import of goods from one country to the other, including on oil and natural gas, and/or (ii) imposes any other form of tax, restriction or prohibition on the import or export of products from one country to the other, including on oil and natural gas; the amount of dividends that we will pay; the number of shares that we will repurchase under our NCIB; future commodity prices and royalty regimes; availability of skilled labour; timing and amount of capital expenditures; future exchange rates; the impact of increasing competition; conditions in general economic and financial markets; availability of drilling and related equipment and services; effects of regulation by governmental agencies; the effects of inflation on our costs and profitability; future interest rates; and future operating costs. Management has included the above summary of assumptions and risks related to forward-looking information provided in this press release in order to provide investors with a more complete perspective on Petrus’ future operations and such information may not be appropriate for other purposes. Petrus’ actual results, performance or achievement could differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, these forward-looking statements and, accordingly, no assurance can be given that any of the events anticipated by the forward-looking statements will transpire or occur, or if any of them do so, what benefits that the Company will derive therefrom. Readers are cautioned that the foregoing lists of factors are not exhaustive.

    This press release contains future-oriented financial information and financial outlook information (collectively, “FOFI”) about Petrus’ prospective results of operations including, without limitation, that our net debt is expected to decline in the second half of the year and is forecasted to return to our 2025 guidance target of $60 million by year-end, and the percentage of our forecast production for 2025 that is hedged, which are subject to the same assumptions, risk factors, limitations, and qualifications as set forth above. Readers are cautioned that the assumptions used in the preparation of such information, although considered reasonable at the time of preparation, may prove to be imprecise and, as such, undue reliance should not be placed on FOFI. Petrus’ actual results, performance or achievement could differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, these FOFI, or if any of them do so, what benefits Petrus will derive therefrom. Petrus has included the FOFI in order to provide readers with a more complete perspective on Petrus’ future operations and such information may not be appropriate for other purposes.

    These forward-looking statements and FOFI are made as of the date of this press release and the Company disclaims any intent or obligation to update any forward-looking statements and FOFI, whether as a result of new information, future events or results or otherwise, other than as required by applicable securities laws.

    BOE Presentation
    The oil and natural gas industry commonly expresses production volumes and reserves on a barrel of oil equivalent (“boe”) basis whereby natural gas volumes are converted at the ratio of six thousand cubic feet to one barrel of oil. The intention is to sum oil and natural gas measurement units into one basis for improved measurement of results and comparisons with other industry participants. Petrus uses the 6:1 boe measure which is the approximate energy equivalence of the two commodities at the burner tip. Boe’s do not represent an economic value equivalence at the wellhead and therefore may be a misleading measure if used in isolation.

    Production and Product Type Information

    References to crude oil (or oil), natural gas liquids (“NGLs”), natural gas and average daily production in this document refer to the light and medium crude oil, conventional natural gas, and NGLs product types, as applicable, as defined in National Instrument 51-101 (“NI 51-101”), except as noted below.

    NI 51-101 includes condensate within the NGLs product type. The Company has disclosed condensate as combined with crude oil and separately from other NGLs since the price of condensate as compared to other NGLs is currently significantly higher and the Company believes that this crude oil and condensate presentation provides a more accurate description of its operations and results therefrom. Crude oil therefore refers to light oil, medium oil, and condensate. NGLs refers to ethane, propane, butane and pentane combined. Natural gas refers to conventional natural gas.

    Dividend Advisory

    The Company’s future dividends, if any, and the level thereof is uncertain. Any decision to pay dividends on the common shares (including the actual amount, the declaration date, the record date and the payment date in connection therewith) will be subject to the discretion of the Board of Directors and may depend on a variety of factors, including, without limitation the Company’s business performance, financial condition, financial requirements, growth plans, expected capital requirements and other conditions existing at such future time including, without limitation, contractual restrictions and satisfaction of the solvency tests imposed on the Company under applicable corporate law. There can be no assurance that the Company will pay dividends in the future.

    Abbreviations

    $000’s thousand dollars
    $/bbl dollars per barrel
    $/boe dollars per barrel of oil equivalent
    $/GJ dollars per gigajoule
    $/mcf dollars per thousand cubic feet
    bbl barrel
    mbbl thousand barrels
    bbl/d barrels per day
    boe barrel of oil equivalent
    mboe thousand barrel of oil equivalent
    mmboe million barrel of oil equivalent
    boe/d barrel of oil equivalent per day
    GJ gigajoule
    GJ/d gigajoules per day
    mcf thousand cubic feet
    mcf/d thousand cubic feet per day
    mmcf/d million cubic feet per day
    bcf billion cubic feet
    NGLs natural gas liquids
    WTI West Texas Intermediate

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI Submissions: Fintec – Visa and Whish Money Announce a Strategic Alliance that is Set to Revolutionize Digital Payments and Financial Services Regionally and Globally

    Source: Whish Money

    Beirut, Lebanon, May 6, 2025 – Visa, a global payments technology leader, and Whish Money SAL, a leading regional fintech, are pleased to announce one of the most strategic partnerships in the region. This partnership will enable Whish to leverage Visa’s advanced services and technology for payments and money movement, while allowing Visa to expand its service offerings to over 1 million Whish app users. A signing ceremony was held to commemorate this significant collaboration, marking a new chapter in the fintech landscape of the region.

    Leila Serhan, Senior Vice President at Visa and Group Country Manager for the North Africa, Levant and Pakistan (NALP) region, commented on the partnership: “This strategic partnership between Visa and Whish is the first in the levant region with an e-wallet and money transfer company, and we align with Whish on multiple pillars, most of which, trust and innovation. This partnership will enable us to bring our advanced payment technologies to a broader audience, facilitating seamless and secure money movement across the world. And as Whish is already present globally and is further expanding its reach, we can further facilitate the international growth through our presence in over 200 countries.”

    Toufic Koussa, CEO and Co-Founder of Whish Money, added: “We are excited to embark on this new collaboration with Visa which marks a significant milestone for Whish Money. By integrating Visa’s cutting-edge technology and services, we are poised to enhance our payment solutions and provide even more secure and efficient financial services to our customers. This partnership underscores our commitment to innovation and excellence in the fintech industry and is a testament to the thorough and careful due diligence Visa undertakes while engaging in such an affiliation given their high compliance standards. Our commitment to compliance and security has enabled us to achieve this unique partnership in the region.”

    This strategic alliance between Visa and Whish Money is set to revolutionize the fintech sector, bringing unparalleled advancements to digital payments and financial services regionally and globally. As both entities leverage their strengths and innovative technologies, the partnership will not only drive economic growth but also set a new benchmark for excellence and security in the industry.

    About Visa:

    Visa (NYSE: V) is a world leader in digital payments, facilitating transactions between consumers, merchants, financial institutions and government entities across more than 200 countries and territories. Our mission is to connect the world through the most innovative, convenient, reliable and secure payments network, enabling individuals, businesses and economies to thrive. We believe that economies that include everyone everywhere, uplift everyone everywhere and see access as foundational to the future of money movement. Learn more at Visa.com .

    About Whish Money:

    Whish Money is part of Talaco Group that was established in 2004, specializing in technology, telecom, software development, money remittance, digital payments and logistics industries. Whish has been one of the first global fintech platforms disrupting the distribution of telecom, ISP, gaming, and gift card vouchers, in addition to the digitization of financial services to corporates, retailers, and end users. With over 1,200 agents in Lebanon and 3,000 points of sale in the UAE, Whish Money continues to expand its reach and impact. Today, Whish has offices in Lebanon, UAE, and the USA serving more than 1 million users in over 110 countries.

    As a licensed and regulated company by the Central Bank of Lebanon, Whish Money adheres strictly to all local and international laws, regulations, and best practices including stringent Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Counter-Terrorism Financing (CTF) measures. Whish works closely with local and international authorities to detect and prevent financial crime. Its robust compliance framework, backed by advanced technology and experienced professionals, ensures that every transaction is screened against local and international watch lists, and is scrutinized to identify and mitigate potential risks, enabling it to provide secure and reliable financial services to its customers.

    MIL OSI – Submitted News

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Arrest made, further information sought in relation to serious incidents, Invercargill

    Source: New Zealand Police

    A young has been arrested as Police progress an investigation into several serious incidents in Invercargill.

    It follows two aggravated robberies, two burglaries and an attempted burglary, all between 1.50am and 4.30am on Monday morning.

    Thankfully, no serious injuries were reported, but the victims were understandably upset and shaken by what occurred, Detective Inspector Stu Harvey said.

    Police have arrested and charged a young person in relation to the incidents. He is facing a number of charges and has been remanded in custody to appear in the Invercargill Youth Court today.

    “The investigation into this offending is still very much active. We understand these events are unnerving for our community, and we are working hard to locate those we believe to be involved,” Detective Inspector Harvey says.

    “We still need the public’s help and want to hear from anyone who might be able to assist.

    “In particular, Police are seeking information about two vehicles that were seen in the area of some of the incidents. One of them, a stolen red Toyota Vitz, was involved in the offending and has been recovered while the other vehicle is described only as a car.

    “Police would like to speak to anyone who saw vehicles fitting these descriptions between 1am and 5am on Monday.”

    Anyone with information about these vehicles or those involved is asked to call Police on 105.  You can also share information anonymously through Crime Stoppers on 0800 555 111.

    ENDS

    MIL OSI New Zealand News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Grassley, Hassan Lead Legislation to Aid Victims of Identity Theft

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Iowa Chuck Grassley
    Download broadcast quality video HERE
    WASHINGTON – Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), a senior member and former chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, and Sen. Maggie Hassan (D-N.H.), a fellow Finance Committee member, reintroduced the Improving Social Security’s Service to Victims of Identity Theft Act to provide efficient help for Americans whose social security numbers have been stolen.
    “Millions of Americans suffer from identity theft each year, and Social Security numbers are a top target. Unfortunately, when a victim calls up the Social Security Administration, they can be jerked around from one contact to another, having to reexplain the situation each time. Our bill will help streamline the process by providing a victim of identity theft with a single point of contact at the agency, easing this frustrating and stressful process,” Grassley said.
    “Victims of identity theft whose Social Security numbers have been stolen shouldn’t have to deal with a cumbersome and frustrating process to get help from the Social Security Administration,” Hassan said. “This bipartisan legislation is an important way to ensure that Americans whose identities are stolen can access support through a streamlined process and a single point of contact at the Social Security Administration. This is one of the many common-sense proposals in Congress to combat waste, fraud, and abuse of taxpayer funds without making it harder for people to access their hard-earned benefits.”
    Background:
    Misuse of Social Security numbers is a large problem, and victims who are affected by identity theft face hurdles when trying to resolve issues with large, multi-office agencies such as the Social Security Administration (SSA).
    Currently, a victim may have to engage in multiple procedures and work with numerous representatives at SSA to resolve Social Security related identity-theft issues. The Grassley-Hassan Improving Social Security’s Service to Victims of Identity Theft Act provides a single, focal point of contact at SSA to provide efficient resolution of an identity-theft victim’s issues.
    Additional cosponsors include Sens. Mike Crapo (R-Idaho), Catherine Cortez Masto (D-N.V.), Bill Cassidy (R-La.), Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), Todd Young (R-Ind.), Angus King (I-Maine), Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and James Lankford (R-Okla.).
    The legislation has the endorsement of numerous groups, including: AARP, Social Security Works, the National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare (NCPSSM) and the National Organization of Social Security Claimants’ Representatives (NOSSCR).
    Full text of the bill can be found HERE.
    Download broadcast quality video of Grassley discussing the legislation HERE.
    -30-

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Durbin, Duckworth, Klobuchar Raise Privacy Concerns About New DOGE Scrutiny of Farmer Finances With USDA Loans

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Illinois Dick Durbin
    May 07, 2025
    WASHINGTON – U.S. Senate Democratic Whip Dick Durbin (D-IL), a member of the Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry, and U.S. Senator Tammy Duckworth (D-IL) joined U.S. Senator Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) in pressing the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) for more information about reports that farm loans and loan guarantees must be inspected and cleared by Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) employees.
    “We write to express concern about a reported memorandum from the Farm Service Agency (FSA) to require certain farm loans and loan guarantees to be cleared through Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) employees,” wrote the Senators.
    “In addition to raising privacy questions, this change could create delays in FSA loans for qualified borrowers,” the Senators continued. “At a time when financial uncertainty is rising for America’s families and farmers, creating more red tape for customers who often have no other options for credit could prevent farmers from getting crops in the ground, animals fed, or cause a beginning farmer to miss out on the purchase of their first parcel of land.”
    Along with Durbin, Duckworth, and Klobuchar, the letter was signed by U.S. Senators Ron Wyden (D-OR), Mark Warner (D-VA), Michael Bennet (D-CO), Richard Blumenthal (D-CT), Mazie Hirono (D-HI), Angus King (I-ME), Tina Smith (D-MN), Ben Ray Luján (D-NM), Jon Ossoff (D-GA), Raphael Warnock (D-GA), John Fetterman (D-PA), Adam Schiff (D-CA), and Elissa Slotkin (D-MI).
    The full letter is available here and below:
    May 6, 2025
    Dear Secretary Rollins, 
    We write to express concern about a reported memorandum from the Farm Service Agency (FSA) to require certain farm loans and loan guarantees to be cleared through Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) employees. In addition to raising privacy questions, this change could create delays in FSA loans for qualified borrowers. At a time when financial uncertainty is rising for America’s families and farmers, creating more red tape for customers who often have no other options for credit could prevent farmers from getting crops in the ground, animals fed, or cause a beginning farmer to miss out on the purchase of their first parcel of land.  
    The April 29, 2025 memo reportedly requires that farm loans and loan guarantees exceeding $500,000 as well as any loans or guarantees to “formal entities” such as an LLC must be “reviewed and cleared” not only by the USDA Chief Financial Officer (CFO) but also by DOGE employees. Because most farming operations are structured as some type of entity, this requirement could impact a large number of loans and loan guarantees. 
    USDA’s Farm Service Agency has recently made improvements to farm loan program procedures to create more efficiency, cut red tape, and streamline application processes to ease the burden on farmers. The Agency has simplified the direct farm loan application to reduce paperwork from 29 pages to 13 pages and implemented a “fast track” expedited review process for farm loan applications. We are concerned this new review could undermine the improvements made by USDA to reduce delays for applicants. 
    We request answers to the following questions by May 13th, 2025. 
      Please provide a copy of the memo directing this new policy and any supporting guidance provided to USDA employees. 
    What is the purpose and the legal basis of this new layer of review? 
     What role, if any, will artificial intelligence systems play in this review? 
    If artificial intelligence systems are used for this review, what systems will be used, and what parameters or instructions will guide the process? 

    Please provide a description of the guardrails that are in place to ensure that any information shared with and used by DOGE will protect the privacy of loan recipients.  
    Please provide a detailed description of all specific farm loan categories the new review policy does or does not apply to.  
       What, if any, is the time limitation for the review? 
    Was any analysis performed about the effect on the applicants of the potential delay or denials as a result of this new policy, and if so, what was the conclusion? 
    The memorandum referenced an Executive Order covering “discretionary spending through Federal contracts, grants, loans, and related instruments” and was not specific to FSA farm loans.  
    Are there similar new procedures in place or being planned for other assistance to agricultural producers either through FSA farm programs or other agencies? If so, what are those procedures? If not, what makes farm loans trigger this review and not the other assistance to the same set of entities? 

      
    We look forward to working with you to ensure that our farmers and ranchers have access to the credit they need. 
    -30-

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Durbin Requests Probe Into Justice Department Use Of Aircraft For Personal Or Political Purposes

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Illinois Dick Durbin
    May 07, 2025
    Request for a GAO review comes amid public reporting of Kash Patel’s repeated travel on government aircraft that raises questions about proper reimbursement and oversight compliance
    WASHINGTON – U.S. Senate Democratic Whip Dick Durbin (D-IL), Ranking Member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, today requested a review of the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) use of government-owned aircraft by senior executives, in light of concerns about compliance with federal regulations that restrict nonmission-related travel and require reimbursement for personal or political use.
    In a letter to the Government Accountability Office (GAO), Durbin began by asserting his request, writing: “I write to request that the Government Accountability Office (GAO) conduct a comprehensive review of the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) use of government-owned aircraft by senior executives.”
    Durbin continued by outlining policies and procedures for executive air travel, writing: “Multiple components within DOJ—including the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), and United States Marshals Service (USMS)—own, lease, and operate a fleet of aircraft primarily to support mission-critical DOJ operations such as counterterrorism, criminal surveillance, and interdiction of illicit drug trafficking. While use of government aircraft for nonmission-related needs is generally prohibited by federal regulations, such aircraft can be made available regardless of the trip’s purpose for ‘required use travel,’ which is travel that ‘requires use of a [g]overnment aircraft to meet bona fide communications needs (e.g., 24-hour secure communications), security requirements (e.g., highly unusual circumstances that present a clear and present danger), or exceptional scheduling requirements… of an executive agency.’ The President has typically designated two executives within DOJ as ‘required use’ travelers—the Attorney General and the FBI Director—due to their need for special protective security measures and secure communications while in flight. However, federal guidance requires that such travelers reimburse the government for any travel that is for political or personal reasons.”
    Durbin then cited recent reporting that FBI Director Kash Patel’s recent travel raises compliance questions, writing: “Some of these flights appear to coincide with official business,  but it is not clear whether all travel was mission-related or personal in nature. Nonetheless, this reporting underscores the need for clarity on whether DOJ executives—including the FBI Director—are complying with applicable regulations and reimbursement requirements for nonmission-related travel and whether DOJ has sufficient internal controls to track and enforce those obligations.”
    Durbin concluded with a request to update its 2013 report into the matter, writing: “Given these developments, I request that GAO review the circumstances in which DOJ aircraft are being used to transport executives for nonmission purposes, including the costs of these flights… This review is critical to ensuring the appropriate use of taxpayer resources and maintaining public trust in DOJ’s operations and use of taxpayer dollars.”
    For a PDF of the letter to GAO, click here.
    -30-

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Bergman Bills to Support Veterans and Strengthen VA Accountability Pass VA Committee

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Jack Bergman (MI-1)

    Rep. Jack Bergman announced today that two of his legislative initiatives—the CHOICE for Veterans Act and the VA Budget Shortfall Accountability Act—successfully passed out of the House Committee on Veterans’ Affairs yesterday.

    “These bills reflect months of collaboration and feedback from Veterans, advocates, and oversight bodies,” said Rep. Bergman. “I’m grateful to my colleagues on the committee for recognizing the importance of protecting Veterans and ensuring the VA is operating with transparency and accountability.”

    The CHOICE for Veterans Act reinstates penalties for unaccredited individuals who charge Veterans for help with filing disability claims. It also permits accredited agents and attorneys to charge fees for initial claim filings—capped at the lesser of $12,500 or five times the Veteran’s monthly benefit increase—while implementing strong guardrails to prevent abuse.

    Key provisions include:

    • Informing Veterans of free services available through Veterans Service Organizations (VSOs).
    • Requiring clear, upfront fee disclosures and allowing Veterans to pay in installments.
    • Enhancing oversight through a public VA website listing accredited representatives and enabling the reporting of unaccredited actors.
    • Protecting data and privacy by requiring HIPAA-compliant systems and banning overseas call centers.
    • Preventing unethical practices such as double billing or charging recently separated service members.

    Additionally, Bergman’s VA Budget Shortfall Accountability Act addresses concerns stemming from the VA’s 2024 budget request, in which the department cited a $3 billion shortfall. Despite that request, the VA ultimately carried over $5 billion in unspent funds.

    “This legislation is about accountability and ensuring Congress has accurate, timely information to support Veterans effectively. By requiring annual reviews of the VA’s budget practices for the next five years, we’re taking meaningful steps to prevent future confusion and protect taxpayer dollars.”

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Off-leash dogs on sports fields pose serious risk to children and players

    Source: Secondary teachers question rationale for changes to relationship education guidelines

    A recent dog attack during a football training session at Tahurangi / Crum Park has highlighted the serious risk off-leash dogs pose to our communities.

    A young girl, watching the football training with family members, was attacked by an uncontrolled dog. She will be left with a large scar and a life-long traumatic memory because of this preventable incident.

    Auckland Council’s General Manager for Licensing and Compliance, Robert Irvine says this is not an isolated incident and off-leash dog attacks on sports fields are on the rise.

    “Similar situations have occurred at other sports grounds where off-leash dogs have rushed at junior players during training,” Mr Irvine says.

    “Week after week, dogs are walked off-leash across Auckland’s sports fields while children train, play, and compete; an attack can and does happen so quickly when there are kids running around and a dog is off leash,” he adds.

    “This behaviour not only puts children and adults at risk of injury, but it also degrades the quality of our fields. Dog fouling on sports grounds is a persistent problem — one that poses health risks and ruins the experience for players.

    Chair of the Regulatory and Safety Committee Councillor Josephine Bartley, herself a dog lover and owner, says it’s unacceptable to have dogs running uncontrolled across our playing fields.

    “No parent wants to see their child land face-first in dog excrement while playing soccer or rugby. 

    “And not only children, but adults too, deserve a safe, clean environment to train and play,” Councillor Bartley says.

    “Dogs must be always kept under control near playing fields. This sort of thoughtless behaviour has serious consequences; let’s keep our sports grounds safe, clean, and enjoyable for everyone.”

    Auckland Council’s regional rule states that dogs are not on most sports playing surfaces at any time. This includes marked football pitches. These areas are for organised sport and recreation — not dog exercise. Dogs may still be allowed away from playing surfaces, including on a leash on the sidelines when sport is being played. Alternative off-leash dog parks and spaces are provided away from playing surfaces.

    To find out where your dog can be exercised off-leash click here

    MIL OSI New Zealand News

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: 5 big wins from DOC’s National Predator Control Programme |

    Source: Police investigating after shots fired at Hastings house

    Learn how bats, Fiordland tokoeka kiwi, and kākā are all benefiting from our landscape-scale predator control programme using 1080 to protect public conservation land.

    Fiordland tokoeka kiwi chick. Image: Belle Gwilliam

    Our National Predator Control Programme

    DOC’s National Predator Control Programme protects native wildlife and forests at important conservation sites across New Zealand.

    Currently, we control predators on a sustained, rotational basis over about 1.8 million hectares, which is nearly 20% of public conservation land.

    It’s critical that rats, stoats, and possums are regularly controlled so that populations of threatened native species can survive and grow.

    We use the most effective tools available, such as 1080 toxin and large-scale trapping, to protect vulnerable native species and forests. 

    While the tools and strategies are being developed to achieve Predator Free 2050, our National Predator Control Programme is holding the line for threatened native species by regularly controlling introduced predators across large forest areas. 

    We recently published our 2024 National Predator Control Programme report which shows we had some big wins for our native species last year.

    You can read the full report here: National Predator Control Programme Annual Report 2024

    Here’s our top five highlights of 2024 – from bustling bat roosts to turning the tide for one of our rarest kiwi species:

    1️⃣ We’ve turned the tide for Fiordland tokoeka kiwi

    Before predator control, every single kiwi chick we monitored in Shy Lake died, meaning the species was facing extinction. 

    After predator control and eight years of research, last year’s kiwi chick survival rate climbed to 60%. 

    Ranger Chris Dodd with ‘Spanners’, one of the first monitored tokoeka chicks to survive during the programme, now fully grown. Image: Monty Williams.

    2️⃣ Thanks to our science advice, we’ve improved timing for operations and achieved our best results yet

    Our scientists carefully reviewed the results of how we time our operations around beech masts. With their advice, we changed tactics and targeted rats either before beech seed was produced or after it had germinated. 

    It paid off big time – all our operations suppressed rats effectively, in most cases down to undetectable levels. 

    Predator plague cycle. Image: DOC

    3️⃣ Pīwauwau rock wren thriving with predator control

    There are an average of twice as many rock wrens at predator control sites compared to sites with no control.

    Every year our team surveys alpine rock wren populations. Research across our 25 sites shows that aerial operations help rock wren populations recover and grow. 

    Tuke/pīwauwau/rock wren calling in the alpine tops of Fiordland. Photo: Sabine Bernert ©

    4️⃣ We found a record-breaking pekapeka bat roost while monitoring the results of predator control

    We discovered 275 bats in one tree roost in Whirinaki Te Pua-a-Tāne Conservation park where we undertake regular predator control operations. That’s a lot of bats! 

    Pekapeka/short-tailed bat. Image: Maddy Brennan

    5️⃣ Thanks to predator control, kākā in Waipapa have the most balanced sex ratio ever recorded

    Female kākā are more vulnerable to predation, especially when they’re confined to nest cavities during breeding season. Studying the ratio of kākā males to females can help us understand the health of a population and its predation pressures. 

    This year, kākā monitoring in Pureora Forest (an ongoing predator control site) revealed a 1:1 sex ratio – the most balanced we’ve ever recorded.  

    Kākā eating rātā flower. Photo: Sarah Stirrup

    ” data-medium-file=”https://i0.wp.com/blog.doc.govt.nz/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/kaka.png?fit=300%2C191&ssl=1″ data-large-file=”https://i0.wp.com/blog.doc.govt.nz/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/kaka.png?fit=580%2C368&ssl=1″ src=”https://i0.wp.com/blog.doc.govt.nz/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/kaka.png?resize=580%2C368&ssl=1″ alt=”” class=”wp-image-56358″ srcset=”https://i0.wp.com/blog.doc.govt.nz/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/kaka.png?w=800&ssl=1 800w, https://i0.wp.com/blog.doc.govt.nz/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/kaka.png?resize=300%2C191&ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/blog.doc.govt.nz/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/kaka.png?resize=768%2C488&ssl=1 768w” sizes=”auto, (max-width: 580px) 100vw, 580px”/>

    Kākā eating some delcious rātā flower. Image: Sarah Stirrup

    Learn more about DOC’s National Predator Control Programme and read the full report here: National Predator Control Programme

    Share this:

    MIL OSI New Zealand News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Hawley Urges DOJ to ‘Reconsider’ Stance in Missouri Mifepristone Case

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator Josh Hawley (R-Mo)

    Today, Senator Hawley (R-Mo.) sent a letter to Attorney General Pam Bondi, urging the Justice Department to reconsider its defense of the Biden Administration’s policy on mifepristone, which allows women to receive the abortion drug with virtually no safeguards. The case is currently pending before a federal district court. 

    A bombshell new study found that more than 1 in 10 women who use mifepristone experience sepsis, infection, hemorrhaging, an emergency room visit, or another serious adverse event within 45 days. The report exposes just how essential reestablishing these guardrails are for women’s health. 

    “While the grounds for dismissal sought are mostly procedural in nature, I am troubled by the fact that the Justice Department has sided with the Biden administration’s position, especially considering new data showing the harms of chemical abortion for women,” Hawley wrote. “I urge you to reconsider.”

    Senator Hawley recently published an op-ed about the health risks of mifepristone and called on the Trump administration to restore the safety regulations on mifepristone without delay. 

    Read the letter here or below.  

    May 7, 2025

    The Honorable Pam Bondi Attorney General
    U.S. Department of Justice 
    950 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
    Washington DC 20530

    Attorney General Bondi:

    Yesterday, your department sought the dismissal of three intervenor state plaintiffs—led by my home state of Missouri—in abortion drug litigation pending before a federal district court. While the grounds for dismissal sought are mostly procedural in nature, I am troubled by the fact that the Justice Department has sided with the Biden administration’s position, especially considering new data showing the harms of chemical abortion for women. I urge you to reconsider.

    Missouri, joined by Idaho and Kansas, is seeking to restore safeguards for the chemical abortion drug, mifepristone, that the Biden administration eliminated. The states have argued their interest in protecting their citizens against the adverse health consequences of the drug—a point which was recently underscored by a landmark new study of mifepristone. That study found that more than 1 in 10 women who use mifepristone experience sepsis, infection, hemorrhaging, an emergency room visit, or another serious adverse event within 45 days. This rate is far greater than the rate reported on the FDA-approved drug label for mifepristone. Despite these severe safety risks, the Biden administration allowed mifepristone to be delivered via mail and without any medical supervision whatsoever. Missouri’s litigation aims to reverse that policy and protect women.

    The Biden administration’s mail-order abortion policy poses a grave threat to the health and safety of American women. I strongly urge you to reconsider the Justice Department’s defense of this policy in court.

    Thank you for your attention to this matter.

    Sincerely,

    Josh Hawley
    United States Senator

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Growing Tomorrow’s Workforce: Shapiro Administration Brings Area K-8 Students to Farm City Day for Hands-On Agriculture Career Inspiration, Exploration

    Source: US State of Pennsylvania

    May 07, 2025Harrisburg, PA

    Growing Tomorrow’s Workforce: Shapiro Administration Brings Area K-8 Students to Farm City Day for Hands-On Agriculture Career Inspiration, Exploration

    The Shapiro Administration welcomed more than 1,300 K-8 students and educators from across southcentral Pennsylvania to the PA Farm Show Complex for hands-on agriculture career exploration during 2025 Farm City Day. Agriculture Secretary Russell Redding toured career exhibits with Acting Education Secretary Dr. Carrie Rowe and students learning firsthand about careers ranging from dairy farming and beekeeping to sustainable forestry, and technology making our planet and food healthier.

    “Agriculture today is not what it was at the beginning of this century, or even this decade,” Secretary Redding said. “We haven’t even dreamed up the technology that will be shaping agriculture when they get out of school, and we will need workers who can change along with the field – flexible problem-solvers who can imagine how new technology can make agriculture better and more efficient, food safer, and our planet healthier. Farm City Day is about sparking student imaginations and broadening their minds to aspects of agriculture they may have never thought of – how plants, and trees, can end up as fabric, plastics, and building materials, and how food waste can become fuel and electricity.”

    Farm City Day brings elementary and middle school students to spend a day interacting with horses, rabbits, lambs, goats, and pigs, and the innovative people who raise animals and crops on Pennsylvania farms, along with others whose work helps ensure healthy food and other products that enrich their daily lives.

    Interviews in Order:
    Russell Redding – Secretary, PA Dept. of Agriculture
    Shannon Hawkins – Teacher, Pennsylvania STEAM Academy, Harrisburg, PA
    Kendall Carter-Mercado – 5th Grade Student, Pennsylvania STEAM Academy, Harrisburg, PA

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Shapiro Administration to Highlight Efforts to Recruit and Retain More Nurses in Pennsylvania at National Student Nurse Day Event

    Source: US State of Pennsylvania

    May 08, 2025Harrisburg, PA

    ADVISORY – Shapiro Administration to Highlight Efforts to Recruit and Retain More Nurses in Pennsylvania at National Student Nurse Day Event

    To celebrate National Student Nurse Day, officials from the Departments of Health, Labor and Industry, and Human Services will join leaders from HACC, Central Pennsylvania’s Community College, to highlight Governor Josh Shapiro’s proposed 2025-26 budget, which significantly invests in recruiting and retaining nurses in Pennsylvania. As Pennsylvania tackles a nursing shortage, offering incentives to nurses proves to be a successful strategy for recruiting and retaining high-quality practitioners.

    The Governor’s budget proposal makes targeted investments to expand the health care workforce, including nurses, ensuring communities have access to high-quality health care. The budget proposal includes $5 million to expand the Department of Health’s Primary Care Loan Repayment Program, and a first-time state-level investment of $5 million to create the Nurse Shortage Assistance Program, which will provide funding to organizations that partner with hospitals and nursing schools to provide student loan repayment to nursing students who commit to a three-year work placement at Pennsylvania hospitals after graduation.

    WHO:
    Department of Labor and Industry Secretary Nancy A. Walker
    Department of Health Special Advisor Dr. Robert Bonacci
    Department of Human Services Deputy Secretary Sally Kozak
    HACC President and CEO John J. “Ski” Sygielski, MBA, Ed.D.
    HACC School of Health Science Associate Dean Cynthia L. Donell, MSN, RN

    WHEN:
    Thursday, May 8, 2025, at 2:00 PM

    WHERE:
    HACC’s Harrisburg Campus
    Select Medical Health Education Pavilion
    One HACC Drive
    Harrisburg, PA 17110

    MEDIA RSVP: Media interested in attending must RSVP with the name of the reporter and photojournalist to ra-dhpressoffice@pa.gov.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Security: Pine Ridge Man Sentenced to 10 Years in Federal Prison for Voluntary Manslaughter

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

    RAPID CITY – United States Attorney Alison J. Ramsdell announced today that U.S. District Judge Karen E. Schreier has sentenced a Pine Ridge, South Dakota, man convicted of Voluntary Manslaughter. The sentencing took place on May 2, 2025.

    Eugene Hunts Horse, age 29, was sentenced to 10 years in federal prison, followed by three years of supervised release, and ordered to pay a $2,000 fine and a $100 special assessment to the Federal Crime Victims Fund.

    A federal grand jury indicted Hunts Horse in May 2024. He pleaded guilty on January 17, 2025.

    On February 24, 2024, the victim arrived at a residence in Wounded Knee and attempted to gain entry into the home. The victim knew the occupants of the trailer and wanted to get inside. A male from within the home assaulted the victim with a weapon and ushered him down the driveway away from the home. Hunts Horse arrived around the time the victim was being escorted down the driveway and used an object to strike the victim several times in the head and body. Hunts Horse, who believed the victim had assaulted his cousin with a hammer earlier in the evening, became enraged and developed the heat of passion necessary to take the life of another. After killing the victim, Hunts Horse learned the victim was not the person who attacked his cousin. The Oglala Sioux Tribe Department of Public Safety responded to the residence and found the victim near the roadway and driveway of the residence with a large fracture to his skull. The victim was bleeding extensively from his head. The victim ultimately passed away from his head injury a short time after the officer arrived.

    This matter was prosecuted by the U.S. Attorney’s Office because the Major Crimes Act, a federal statute, mandates that certain violent crimes alleged to have occurred in Indian country be prosecuted in Federal court as opposed to State court.

    This case was investigated by the Oglala Sioux Tribe Department of Public Safety. Assistant U.S. Attorney Megan Poppen prosecuted the case.

    Hunts Horse was immediately remanded to the custody of the U.S. Marshals Service.

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Security: Justice Department Announces Results of Operation Restore Justice: 205 Child Sex Abuse Offenders Arrested in FBI-led Nationwide Crackdown, Including Four in the Southern District of California

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

    SAN DIEGO – Today, the Department of Justice announced the results of Operation Restore Justice, a coordinated enforcement effort to identify, track and arrest child sex predators. The operation resulted in the rescue of 115 children and the arrests of 205 child sexual abuse offenders in the nationwide crackdown.  The coordinated effort was executed over the course of five days by all 55 FBI field offices, the Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section in the Department’s Criminal Division, and United States Attorney’s Offices around the country.

    “The Department of Justice will never stop fighting to protect victims — especially child victims — and we will not rest until we hunt down, arrest, and prosecute every child predator who preys on the most vulnerable among us,” said Attorney General Pamela Bondi. “I am grateful to the FBI and their state and local partners for their incredible work in Operation Restore Justice and have directed my prosecutors not to negotiate.”

    “Every child deserves to grow up free from fear and exploitation, and the FBI will continue to be relentless in our pursuit of those who exploit the most vulnerable among us,” said FBI Director Kash Patel. “Operation Restore Justice proves that no predator is out of reach and no child will be forgotten. By leveraging the strength of all our field offices and our federal, state and local partners, we’re sending a clear message: there is no place to hide for those who prey on children.”

    “Protecting our community means identifying, arresting and holding accountable anyone who would prey on children,” said U.S. Attorney Adam Gordon. “I’m grateful for the coordinated efforts of law enforcement in this district and across the nation, and our office will continue to prioritize these prosecutions to obtain justice for these vulnerable victims.”

    “Each arrest is a powerful testament to the tireless efforts of the FBI and our dedicated law enforcement partners to protect the most vulnerable among us,” said FBI San Diego Acting Special Agent in Charge Houtan Moshrefi. “It reaffirms our unwavering commitment to pursuing justice for victims and holding predators accountable.”

    In the Southern District of California, four individuals were arrested and charged with federal crimes, including:

    • Seth Wheeler, who was indicted for distribution of images of minors engaged in sexually explicit conduct and possession of images of minors engaged in sexually explicit conduct. Wheeler is alleged to have distributed child pornography on two different occasions in September 2024, and in possession of child pornography in October 2024.  He was previously arrested by the state and remained in state custody until he was indicted on federal charges.
    • Adam Harrison Bryant, a convicted sex offender who was charged with possession of child pornography. The investigation of Bryan began when it was suspected that he had attempted to purchase child pornography from a website using cryptocurrency.  A search warrant was executed on May 1, 2025, and Bryant was arrested when he was found in possession of an electronic device that contained child pornography. He was previously convicted in 2008 of travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct and enticing a child and was sentenced to 40 months and 24 months, concurrent, followed by ten years of supervised release.
    • Kristho Angel Valdez, whowas charged with receipt of images of minors engaged in sexually explicit conduct. Law enforcement officials were notified that two minor victims were exchanging sexually explicit content, including images and videos, through Snapchat with an unknown individual. Valdez was identified as the potential user of the Snapchat account and a search warrant for the account revealed thousands of sexually explicit images and videos of minors. On March 12, 2025, a search warrant was executed at Valdez’s residence. Valdez admitted to receiving sexually explicit videos from the minor victims.
    • Christopher David Miller, who was charged with attempted receipt and possession of images of minors engaged in sexually explicit conduct. Agents began investigating Miller when they determined that IP addresses linked to his current and former residences attempted to obtain child pornography using Freenet, a peer-to-peer file sharing platform. A search warrant was executed at Miller’s residence on April 9, 2025, and Miller was found to be in possession of electronic devices containing child pornography.

    Others arrested around the country are alleged to have committed various crimes including the production, distribution, and possession of child sexual abuse material, online enticement and transportation of minors, and child sex trafficking. In Minneapolis, for example, a state trooper and Army Reservist was arrested for allegedly producing child sexual abuse material while wearing his uniforms. In Norfolk, VA, an illegal alien from Mexico is accused of transporting a minor across state lines for sex. In Washington, D.C., a former Metropolitan Police Department Police Officer was arrested for allegedly trafficking minor victims.

    In many cases, parental vigilance and community outreach efforts played a critical role in bringing these offenders to justice. For example, a California man was arrested about eight hours after a young victim bravely came forward and disclosed their abuse to FBI agents after an online safety presentation at a school near Albany, N.Y.

    This effort follows the Department’s observance of National Child Abuse Prevention Month in April and underscores the Department’s unwavering commitment to protecting children and raising awareness about the dangers they face. While the Department, including the FBI, investigates and prosecutes these crimes every day, April serves as a powerful reminder of the importance of preventing these crimes, seeking justice for victims, and raising awareness through community education.

    The Justice Department is committed to combating child sexual exploitation. These cases were brought as part of Project Safe Childhood, a nationwide initiative to combat the epidemic of child sexual exploitation and abuse launched in May 2006 by the Department of Justice. Led by U.S. Attorneys’ Offices and CEOS, Project Safe Childhood marshals federal, state, and local resources to better locate, apprehend, and prosecute individuals who exploit children via the internet, as well as to identify and rescue victims. For more information about Project Safe Childhood, visit www.justice.gov/psc.

    The Department partners with and oversees funding grants for the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC), which receives and shares tips about possible child sexual exploitation received through its 24/7 hotline at 1-800-THE-LOST and on missingkids.org.

    The Department urges the public to remain vigilant and report suspected exploitation of a child through the FBI’s tipline at 1-800-CALL-FBI (225-5324), tips.fbi.gov, or by calling your local FBI field office.

    Other online resources:

    Violent Crimes Against Children

    How we can help you: Parents and caregivers protecting your kids

    An indictment or complaint is merely an allegation. The defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: Greenpeace calls on Woodside shareholders to reject gas expansion plans at AGM

    Source: Greenpeace Statement –

    PERTH, Thursday 8 May 2025 – Greenpeace Australia Pacific is challenging Woodside on its troubling track record of harming WA’s oceans at its AGM, and urged shareholders to reject Woodside’s plans to drill for gas near Scott Reef. 

    Environment groups and concerned community members will stage a protest outside Woodside’s AGM at the Crown Towers in Perth, and Greenpeace will also directly challenge Woodside’s leadership and its gas expansion plans during the AGM proceedings. 

    Due to participate in Woodside’s AGM as a proxy shareholder, David Ritter, CEO at Greenpeace Australia Pacific said: “For the fourth year, Greenpeace has returned to Woodside’s AGM to expose its shameful environmental track record of harm to marine life, oil and chemical spills, and more. Woodside’s plans pose an unacceptable risk–this is a company that simply can’t be trusted with our oceans. 

    “Woodside’s planned Browse gas field would entail drilling up to 50 wells as close as 2 kilometres from Scott Reef, home to nesting sea turtles, endangered pygmy blue whales and dusky sea snakes. Its new carbon dumping plans involve repeated seismic blasting over the next 39 years, which can deafen whales, near Scott Reef. 

    “Woodside wants to turn Scott Reef into an industrial gas zone. We urge Woodside shareholders not to allow our precious oceans, whales, and turtles to face potentially irreversible harm, and call on Woodside to reconsider its plans. 

    “From leaving its trash in the ocean until Greenpeace pushed it to clean it up to delivering a climate plan that faced unprecedented rejection by shareholders last year, Woodside’s environmental and climate governance under its current leadership is not up to scratch with what shareholders or regulators expect. 

    “To protect the environment, Greenpeace is urging shareholders to vote down the re-election of board director Ann Pickard, who chairs Woodside’s sustainability committee. Between the multiple environmental failures on her watch and her history of leading Shell’s now-abandoned push to destroy the Arctic for oil, she does not inspire any confidence on sustainability. 

    “We are also calling on the newly re-elected Albanese government to listen to the millions of Australians who rejected the Coalition’s gas fast-track plans, and voted for nature protection and a safe climate future powered by renewables. Sentiment for climate action was also clear in WA, with a surge in support for Independent candidates championing the shift away from climate-wrecking gas expansion. 

    “In its second term, the Albanese government has an opportunity to stand up for oceans, marine life and clean energy. It must heed the evidence and reject Woodside’s proposals to extend its North West Shelf gas processing facility, and develop the Browse gas field. Doing so would protect Scott Reef from damage from industrial activity and prevent billions of tonnes of climate-wrecking emissions. 

    “We are halfway through the critical decade for action on climate change, and in the middle of a climate and biodiversity crisis. Corporations, shareholders, and governments alike must put an end to polluting fossil fuel projects, and accelerate the transition to clean, affordable renewable energy.” 

    —ENDS—

    For more information or to arrange an interview please contact Vai Shah on 0452 290 082 or [email protected].

    Photos from the protest and file photos for editorial use will be available here after the protest: Google Drive folder

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI USA: Cornyn, Fetterman, Lankford, Gallego Introduce SHIELD Against CCP Act

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Texas John Cornyn
    WASHINGTON – U.S. Senators John Cornyn (R-TX), John Fetterman (D-PA), James Lankford (R-OK), and Ruben Gallego (D-AZ) introduced the SHIELD Against CCP Act, which would create a dedicated working group at the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to address threats posed by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP):
    “To effectively counter China, the U.S. must target them from all angles and through all agencies,” said Sen. Cornyn. “This widely supported, commonsense legislation would allow the Department of Homeland Security to arm itself with the tools to protect our sovereignty against the CCP’s malign influence.”
    “The CCP controls everything that happens in China and they will cheat, steal, and poison our communities if it helps them get ahead. They supply the chemicals behind the fentanyl claiming Pennsylvanian lives, rig our immigration rules, and rip off ideas from American companies. Enough is enough,” said Sen. Fetterman. “I’m teaming up with Senators Cornyn, Gallego, and Lankford on the SHIELD Against CCP Act to make sure DHS has the muscle to punch back and keep our people safe.”
    “The Chinese Communist Party threatens our sovereignty—whether it’s flooding our border with illegal immigrants, launching cyberattacks, or pushing deadly fentanyl into our communities,” said Sen. Lankford. “The SHIELD Against CCP Act provides the Department of Homeland Security with the necessary tools to address these challenges directly, safeguard our borders, and protect the American people.”
    “Fentanyl has devastated communities across Arizona for too long, and we need to use every tool available to stop the flow of this deadly drug into our country,” said Sen. Gallego. “This bipartisan bill will help DHS understand how the Chinese Communist Party is exploiting our border and fueling fentanyl trafficking, so we can close those gaps and keep our communities safe.”
    Companion legislation, led by Congressmen Dale Strong (AL-05) and Tom Suozzi (NY-03), overwhelmingly passed the House of Representatives 409-4.
    Background:
    The SHIELD Against CCP Act would establish a working group within the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to:
    Examine, assess, and report on efforts by DHS to counter terrorist, cybersecurity, border and port security, and transportation security threats posed to the U.S. by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), including:
    Exploitation of the U.S. immigration system through identify theft, visa processes, unlawful border crossings, human smuggling, and human trafficking;
    Predatory economic and trade practices, including trafficking of counterfeit and pirated goods, use of forced labor, customs fraud, and IP theft;
    Direct or indirect support of Transnational Criminal Organizations (TCOs) trafficking fentanyl, illicit drug precursors, and other controlled substances through the US border, international mail shipments, or express consignment operations;
    And support for illicit financial activity by Chinese Money Laundering Organizations.

    Review information gathered by federal, state, and local law enforcement relating to threats, and disseminate such information to relevant authorities;
    Submit an annual report on its activities to the Homeland Security, Finance, Judiciary, Foreign Relations, and Banking Committees;
    And sunset seven years post-establishment.
    The bill would also require DHS Science and Technology Directorate to research technologies and techniques to enhance DHS’s security and situational awareness related to countering threats posed to the U.S. by the CCP.
    The SHIELD Against CCP Act is endorsed by the Federal Law Enforcement Officers Association (FLEOA), National Border Patrol Council, National Fusion Center Association, Major County Sheriffs of America, National Narcotics Officers’ Associations’ Coalition, and National HIDTA Director’s Association (NHDA).

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Global: Indian airstrikes in Kashmir following tourist attack raises fears of a regional conflict

    Source: The Conversation – Canada – By MD Rakib Jahan, PhD Student, Department of Political Studies, International Relations, Queen’s University, Ontario

    In response to the Pahalgam terrorist attack on tourists in Jammu and Kashmir last month,, India has launched “Operation Sindoor,” a series of targeted airstrikes on nine locations in Pakistan and Pakistan-administered Kashmir.

    The killing of 26 tourists in Kashmir’s Baisaran Valley on April 22 did more than shatter a moment of peace in one of South Asia’s most scenic regions. The assault has significantly increased India-Pakistan tensions and generated worries of possible military conflict between two nuclear-armed countries.

    Though Pakistan denies the charges, India has specifically held Pakistan responsible for sheltering terrorist groups.

    In response to the attack, India has taken several actions against Pakistan, including downgrading diplomatic ties, recalling diplomats, suspending participation in a vital water-sharing agreement and closing a significant border crossing.

    This rapidly deteriorating situation underscores the broader consequences of the devastating Pahalgam assault.




    Read more:
    India and Pakistan have fought many wars in the past. Are we on the precipice of a new one?


    Human tragedy

    Described by the region’s chief minister, Omar Abdullah, as “much larger than anything we’ve seen directed at civilians in recent years,” the assault in Pahalgam is not only a humanitarian tragedy and a blow to Kashmir’s economy but a flashpoint in an already fragile regional relationship.

    The Pahalgam attack’s timing coincided with United States Vice President JD Vance’s visit to India in April. This mirrors a grim pattern that includes former U.S. president Bill Clinton’s 2000 trip, when militants struck Chittisinghpura in Jammu and Kashmir hours before his arrival.

    By staging violence during diplomatic milestones, militants aim to amplify global attention and send a message to the Indian government. As global attention shifts back to Kashmir, the Baisaran massacre appears to mark a new chapter in the long-fought battle over this territory — one that risks tourism, targets civilians and threatens to unravel regional stability.

    Strategic targeting of Kashmir’s economy

    Though Kashmir has seen warfare for decades, militant groups had mostly avoided targeting visitors because of the the economic significance of tourism to Kashmir.

    The calculated selection of Pahalgam — one of Kashmir’s top tourist sites — reveals a plan to attack the core of Kashmir’s economy. According to counter-terrorism expert Ajai Sahni, the local community and militant groups have an implicit understanding not to compromise the tourism industry.

    By breaking this unwritten rule, the militants have demonstrated a willingness to inflict economic harm on the population.

    Nearly everyone in Kashmir, particularly in the valley, depends on tourism either directly or indirectly. Tourism, which has seen a resurgence since the COVID-19 pandemic, generates thousands of direct and indirect jobs and more than eight per cent of Kashmir’s GDP.

    Experts like Amitabh Mattoo, from the School of International Studies at Jawaharlal Nehru University, warn that Kashmir may experience long-term devastating effects from a drop in tourism. A significant exodus of travellers from Kashmir has already taken place.




    Read more:
    Why are India and Pakistan on the brink of war and how dangerous is the situation? An expert explains


    Challenging India’s post-2019 Kashmir narrative

    The assault also weakens India’s narrative on Kashmir, an area that has been disputed by both Pakistan and India since their independence from Britain in 1947.

    The attack took place as India Prime Minister Narendra Modi was scheduled to open a multi-billion-dollar railway project to the Kashmir Valley, which his government contends will enhance tourism and economic development.

    Modi’s administration has presented the rise in tourism as proof of “normalcy” coming back to Kashmir following India’s removal of special status to Kashmir.

    The intentional targeting of visitors sends a message that the illusion of normalcy is misleading.

    A deadly departure from past tactics

    The Resistance Front (TRF), a rather unknown militant group founded in 2019 and designated as a “terrorist organization” by the Indian government in January 2023, claimed responsibility for the assault via social media. They offered no proof to back their assertion.

    TRF represents a new breed of militant Kashmiri nationalism and resistance. Indian intelligence agencies have connected the group to the Pakistan-based terrorist organization Lashkar-e-Taiba.

    TRF’s communication regarding the assault emphasized resistance to new “outsider” residency rights. This corresponds with worries voiced by some Kashmiris after 2019 modifications permitted non-locals to acquire land and get employment in the area.

    The government disclosed in April 2025 that 83,000 individuals have been given residence certificates under these new standards in the last two years.

    The future of Kashmir’s stability

    Apart from causing obvious human sorrow, the Pahalgam slaughter also endangers years of economic development and could send Jammu and Kashmir back into a cycle of bloodshed and instability.

    Targeting tourists could mean militants are willing to risk Kashmir’s economic core. The assault appears to be an attempt to internationalize the Kashmir problem at a time when worldwide interest had started to fade. It also exploits religious divides, and has succeeded in inciting severe security reactions.

    The future seems more and more uncertain for ordinary Kashmiris caught between security crackdowns and militant brutality. Historical trends indicate that more militancy usually results in more security policies, putting more strain on civilian life.

    For many teenagers and young people in Jammu and Kashmir, the lack of consistent income, mobility limitations and increased monitoring intensifies sensations of marginalization and anger.

    Radical groups can take advantage of these frustrations. To counter this, economic policies must address these inequalities.




    Read more:
    India-Pakistan strikes: 5 essential reads on decades of rivalry and tensions over Kashmir


    A strategy for the way ahead

    The Pahalgam incident calls for a counter-terrorism strategy that balances security with socio-economic stability.

    For example, tourism profit-sharing systems could be implemented and tax advantages or subsidies could be offered to tour businesses, especially those employing young marginalized demographics. This could help to bring some financial respite as well as long-term stability and has been successful in countries like Rwanda.

    The failure to pre-empt the attack despite heightened security during the Vance’s visit and the Hindu pilgrimage season reveals systematic intelligence failures.

    The way ahead calls for tackling both security issues and the underlying complaints still driving militancy in Jammu and Kashmir as the region once again confronts the possibility of violence.

    United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres has urged both nations to de-escalate and return to diplomacy.

    MD Rakib Jahan does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. Indian airstrikes in Kashmir following tourist attack raises fears of a regional conflict – https://theconversation.com/indian-airstrikes-in-kashmir-following-tourist-attack-raises-fears-of-a-regional-conflict-256166

    MIL OSI – Global Reports

  • MIL-OSI USA: Vasquez: DEA Drug Bust Underscores Urgent Need to Resource Border, Fight Cartels

    Source: US Representative Gabe Vasquez’s (NM-02)

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — Following a major federal operation that dismantled a Sinaloa Cartel-linked drug trafficking ring in New Mexico, U.S. Representative Gabe Vasquez (NM-02) is renewing his call for a fully resourced border and bipartisan action to combat fentanyl and transnational criminal networks. 

    “The takedown of a cartel-linked drug ring in southeastern New Mexico is a major win in the fight to keep fentanyl and organized crime off our streets,” said Vasquez. “These are the targeted operations that save lives and protect our communities. But to stay ahead, we need a fully resourced border with proper staffing, cutting-edge technology, and modern infrastructure at our ports of entry. This bust proves that when we work together, we can disrupt the cartels and defend our neighborhoods. I’ll keep pushing for real, bipartisan solutions that stop the flow of deadly drugs and keep New Mexico families safe.”

    The bust, which resulted in dozens of arrests and the seizure of dangerous narcotics, highlights the ongoing threat cartels pose to New Mexico communities and the need for smart, coordinated enforcement strategies.

    ###

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Attorney General Bonta Busts Fraudster for Stealing Over $400,000 from a Citizen of the Pechanga Band of Indians

    Source: US State of California

    Wednesday, May 7, 2025

    Contact: (916) 210-6000, agpressoffice@doj.ca.gov

    ORANGE COUNTY – California Attorney General Rob Bonta today announced the filing of felony charges against a caretaker for stealing over $400,000 from a citizen of the Pechanga Band of Indians who was a dependent adult in her care. The California Department of Justice (DOJ) received a referral from the FBI alleging that the caretaker embezzled money from the victim to pay for personal expenses. These funds were received monthly by the victim from the Pechanga Tribe.
     
    “Caretakers have a profound responsibility to treat those in their care with the highest level of compassion and dignity,” said Attorney General Bonta. “They support individuals during some of the most challenging moments in their lives. At the California Department of Justice, we are committed to fighting against all types of abuse, theft, and neglect. We will take prompt action to hold accountable anyone who exploits or harms vulnerable members of our communities.”
     
    It is alleged that between October 2018 and January 2021, the caretaker used the victim’s funds to pay for vacations, luxurious dinners, mortgage payments, and other personal expenses. DOJ filed criminal charges in the Orange County Superior Court for Embezzlement, Theft from a Dependent Adult, and Grand Theft exceeding $100,000. 
     
    It is important to note that criminal charges must be proven in a court of law. Every defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty.
     
    The California Department of Justice’s Division of Medi-Cal Fraud and Elder Abuse (DMFEA) works to protect Californians by investigating and prosecuting those responsible for abuse, neglect, and fraud committed against elderly and dependent adults in the state, and those who perpetrate fraud on the Medi-Cal program.

    The Division of Medi-Cal Fraud and Elder Abuse receives 75 percent of its funding from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services under a grant award totaling $69,244,976 for Federal fiscal year (FY) 2025. The remaining 25 percent is funded by the State of California. FY 2025 is from October 1, 2024, through September 30, 2025.
     
    A copy of the complaint can be found here. 

    # # #

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Senator Marshall Joins Senator Britt in Introducing MOMS Act to Support Women, Strengthen Families

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Kansas Roger Marshall
    Washington – U.S. Senator Roger Marshall, M.D. (R-Kansas) joined Senators Katie Britt (R-Alabama), Kevin Cramer (R-North Dakota), and Eric Schmitt (R-Missouri) in introducing the More Opportunities for Moms to Succeed (MOMS) Act. This legislation would improve access to critical resources during the toughest phases of motherhood, including the prenatal, postpartum, and early childhood development stages.
    In 2023, the number of U.S. births was the lowest since 1979, and the total fertility rate in America hit an all-time low. Last year, fertility and birth rates remained near record lows, reflecting a continued, concerning trend in America.
    “As a former OB-GYN who spent over 25 years caring for thousands of women and delivering over 5,000 babies, I understand firsthand the importance of supporting mothers throughout their pregnancy and into motherhood,” said Senator Marshall. “The MOMS Act is critical legislation to ensure we are providing countless women in America the resources they need. I am proud to stand beside Senator Britt in sponsoring this much-needed, pro-family legislation.”
    “The Republican Party is the party of life, the party of parents, and the party of families. At the heart of the MOMS Act is building a comprehensive culture of life to give moms, children, and families the support system they need to thrive and live their American Dream,” said Senator Britt. “As a mom myself, I don’t have to wonder what other moms are facing – I’m living it. I know firsthand that there is no greater blessing in life than our children and I also understand the types of challenges that women face during their pregnancy journeys and while raising their kids. I’m proud to support women throughout these seasons of motherhood, and the MOMS Act is part of my continued commitment to fight on their behalf.”
    The legislation is also co-sponsored by Senators Steve Daines (R-Montana), Jerry Moran (R-Kansas), Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), Marsha Blackburn (R-Tennessee), John Cornyn (R-Texas), James Lankford (R-Oklahoma), Roger Wicker (R-Mississippi), Jim Risch (R-Idaho), Mike Crapo (R-Idaho), Dave McCormick (R-Pennsylvania), Pete Ricketts (R-Nebraska), Jim Justice (R-West Virginia) and Tim Sheehy (R-Montana).
    This legislation is endorsed by Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America, Americans United for Life, March for Life Action, the National Right to Life Committee, Students for Life Action, Concerned Women of America, the Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission, and the Human Coalition.
    The full text of the bill can be viewed here. 
    Background:
    The MOMS Act would establish a website of resources, Pregnancy.gov, for expecting and postpartum moms, as well as those with young children, which will increase access to adoption agencies, pregnancy resource centers, and other relevant public and private resources available to pregnant women near their zip code and surrounding areas.
    These relevant resources include health and well-being services; financial assistance; and material and legal support. HHS would also be required to include and maintain a national list of federal funding opportunities available to non-profit and healthcare entities for pregnancy support.
    The legislation would also improve access to pre and post-natal resources and would establish a grant program for non-profit entities to support, encourage, and assist women in carrying their pregnancies to term and to care for their babies after birth. 
    It would also institute a grant program to purchase necessary medical equipment and technology in rural areas and other medically underserved areas to support pre-natal and post-natal telehealth appointments.
    The MOMS Act also includes Senator Cramer’s Unborn Child Support Act to allow states to apply child support obligations to the time during pregnancy.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI: Ring Energy Announces First Quarter 2025 Results and Provides Updated 2025 Outlook

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    THE WOODLANDS, Texas, May 07, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Ring Energy, Inc. (NYSE American: REI) (“Ring” or the “Company”) today reported operational and financial results for first quarter 2025 and provided updated guidance for the second half of the year.

    First Quarter 2025 Highlights

    • Sold 12,074 barrels of oil per day (“Bo/d”) (> high end of guidance) and 18,392 barrels of oil equivalent per day (“Boe/d”) (> mid point of guidance);
    • Reported net income of $9.1 million, or $0.05 per diluted share, and Adjusted Net Income1 of $10.7 million, or $0.05 per diluted share;
    • Recorded Adjusted EBITDA1 of $46.4 million and Lease Operating Expense (“LOE”) of $11.89 per Boe (< mid point of guidance);
    • Invested $32.5 million in capital expenditures (within guidance, excluding acquisitions) that was 14% lower than 4Q 2024
    • Generated Adjusted Cash Flow from Operations1 of $38.2 million and Adjusted Free Cash Flow (“AFCF”)1 of $5.8 million;
    • Remained cash flow positive for the 22nd consecutive quarter and had liquidity of $141.1 million at the end of the period;
    • Completed highly-accretive acquisition of Central Basin Platform (“CBP”) assets from Lime Rock Resources IV, LP (“Lime Rock’) on March 31, 2025 with operations to date exceeding expectations; and
    • Provided updated guidance for the remainder of 2025, which reflects more than a 47% decrease in capital spending from original guidance for time period 2Q to 4Q 2025.

    Management Commentary

    Mr. Paul D. McKinney, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, commented, “We’re excited to kick off 2025 with a strong first quarter, showcasing the flexibility, resilience, and strength of our proven, value-focused strategy amid fluctuating oil prices. Our performance met or surpassed all guidance targets, driven by exceptional oil sales volumes. As shared earlier, this success stemmed from the outperformance of our newly drilled wells and the tireless dedication of our operations team, who kept our PDP assets running at peak efficiency. On the final day of the quarter, we closed the highly accretive acquisition of Lime Rock’s CBP assets, which are outperforming the forecasts originally used to value them, adding more value to our portfolio. To set the stage for this synergistic transaction, we strategically adjusted the timing of our drilling program and capital spending initiatives, optimizing our financial position and reinforcing our balance sheet. With this strong foundation, we’re poised to continue delivering value to our stockholders despite the uncertainties currently facing our industry.”

    Mr. McKinney concluded, “We have been looking forward to sharing more about our proactive approach to navigating the recent dip in oil prices, showcasing the strength of our value-focused strategy. As previously announced, we’ve strategically reduced our second quarter capital spending by over 50%, while maintaining our sales volume guidance. Looking ahead, our updated full-year guidance reflects a 36% reduction in capital spending with only a 5% reduction to sales volumes, made possible by the exceptional performance of both our existing and newly acquired assets so far this year. This represents a 2% increase of year-over-year total sales. Should oil prices rise later in the year, we’re positioned to accelerate our debt reduction efforts, channeling the benefits of higher prices into strengthening our balance sheet. This disciplined approach highlights our proven strategy. We’re committed to delivering value for our stockholders and are deeply grateful for your trust and investment in Ring Energy as we build a brighter, more resilient future together.”

    Summary Results and Additional Key Items

      Q1 2025 Q4 2024 Q1 2025
    to Q
    4 2024
    % Change
    Q1 2024 Q1 2025
    to Q
    1 2024
    % Change
    Average Daily Sales Volumes (Boe/d) 18,392 19,658 (6)% 19,034 (3)%
    Crude Oil (Bo/d) 12,074 12,916 (7)% 13,394 (10)%
    Net Sales (MBoe) 1,655.3 1,808.5 (8)% 1,732.1 (4)%
    Realized Price – All Products ($/Boe) $47.78 $46.14 4% $54.56 (12)%
    Realized Price – Crude Oil ($/Bo) $70.40 $68.98 2% $75.72 (7)%
    Revenues ($MM) $79.1 $83.4 (5)% $94.5 (16)%
    Net Income ($MM) $9.1 $5.7 60% $5.5 65%
    Adjusted Net Income1 ($MM) $10.7 $12.3 (13)% $20.3 (47)%
    Adjusted EBITDA1 ($MM) $46.4 $50.9 (9)% $62.0 (25)%
    Capital Expenditures ($MM) $32.5 $37.6 (14)% $36.3 (10)%
    Adjusted Free Cash Flow1 ($MM) $5.8 $4.7 23% $15.6 (63)%


    Adjusted Net Income, Adjusted EBITDA, and Adjusted Free Cash Flow
    are non-GAAP financial measures, which are described in more detail and reconciled to the most comparable GAAP measures, in the tables shown later in this release under “Non-GAAP Financial Information.” In addition, see section titled “Condensed Operating Data” for additional details concerning costs and expenses discussed below.

    Sales volumes for 1Q 2025 were 18,392 Boe/d (66% oil, 18% natural gas liquids (“NGLs”) and 16% natural gas) versus 4Q 2024 sales volumes of 19,658 Boe/d (66% oil, 19% NGLs and 15% natural gas) and 1Q 2024 sales volumes of 19,034 Boe/d (70% oil, 15% NGLs and 15% natural gas).

    Average realized sales prices for 1Q 2025 were $70.40 per barrel of crude oil, $(0.19) per Mcf of natural gas, and $9.65 per barrel of NGLs. The realized natural gas and NGL prices were impacted by increased fees resulting in lower realized prices. The weighted average natural gas price per Mcf was $1.86 and the weighted average fee per Mcf was $(2.05); the weighted average NGL price per barrel was $22.64 offset by a weighted average fee per barrel of $(12.99). The weighted average natural gas price for 1Q 2025 reflects continued natural gas product takeaway constraints, which are being alleviated through additional third-party pipeline capacity. The average oil price differential the Company experienced from NYMEX WTI (“West Texas Intermediate”) futures pricing in 1Q 2025 was a negative $0.89 per barrel of crude oil, while the average natural gas price differential from NYMEX futures pricing was a negative $3.81 per Mcf.

    Revenues were $79.1 million for 1Q 2025 compared to $83.4 million for 4Q 2024 and $94.5 million for 1Q 2024. The 5% decrease in 1Q 2025 revenues from 4Q 2024 was driven by a negative $7.3 million volume variance offset by a positive $3.0 million price variance.

    Select Expenses and Other Items

      Q1 2025 Q4 2024 Q1 2025
    to Q
    4 2024
    % Change
    Q1 2024 Q1 2025
    to Q
    1 2024
    % Change
    Lease operating expenses (“LOE”) ($MM) $19.7 $20.3 (3)% $18.4 7%
    Lease operating expenses ($/BOE) (1) $11.89 $11.24 6% $10.60 12%
    Depreciation, depletion and amortization ($MM) $22.6 $24.5 (8)% $23.8 (5)%
    Depreciation, depletion and amortization ($/BOE) $13.66 $13.57 1% $13.74 (1)%
    General and administrative expenses (“G&A”) ($MM) $8.6 $8.0 8% $7.5 15%
    General and administrative expenses ($/BOE) $5.21 $4.44 17% $4.31 21%
    G&A excluding share-based compensation ($MM) $6.9 $6.4 8% $5.7 (21)%
    G&A excluding share-based compensation ($/BOE) $4.19 $3.52 19% $3.32 26%
    G&A excluding share-based compensation & transaction costs ($MM) $6.9 $6.3 10% $5.7 21%
    G&A excluding share-based compensation & transaction costs ($/BOE) $4.18 $3.51 19% $3.32 26%
    Interest expense ($MM) (2) $9.5 $10.1 (6)% $11.5 (17)%
    Interest expense ($/BOE) $5.74 $5.59 3% $6.64 (14)%
    Gain (loss) on derivative contracts ($MM) (3) $(0.9) $(6.3) 85% $(19.0) 95%
    Realized gain (loss) on derivative contracts ($MM) $(0.5) $0.7 (171)% $(1.4) 64%
    Unrealized gain (loss) on derivative contracts ($MM) $(0.4) $(7.0) 94% $(17.6) 98%

    (1) LOE was within the Company’s guidance of $11.75 to $12.25 per Boe for 1Q 2025.

    (2) The decline in interest expense from prior quarters was due to lower interest rates and reduced borrowings on the credit facility.

    (3) A summary listing of the Company’s outstanding derivative positions at March 31, 2025 is included in the tables shown later in this release. For the remainder (April through December) of 2025, the Company has approximately 1.7 million barrels of oil (approximately 47% of oil sales guidance midpoint) hedged at an average downside protection price of $64.44 and approximately 2.0 billion cubic feet of natural gas (approximately 37% of natural gas sales guidance midpoint) hedged at an average downside protection of $3.43.

    Capital Investment

    During 1Q 2025, capital expenditures for the Company’s drilling and development activities were $32.5 million, which was within the Company’s guidance of $26 million to $34 million. Ring also invested approximately $70.9 million for the Lime Rock Acquisition that closed on March 31, 2025 (including the $63.6 million cash payment at closing, the $5.0 million deposit payment made in February, and $2.3 million in direct transaction costs).

    Drilling and Development

    Ring drilled, completed, and placed on production seven wells. In the Northwest Shelf in Yoakum County, Ring drilled and completed three 1-mile horizontal wells and one 1.25-mile horizontal well, all with a working interest of 75%. In the CBP in Ector County, the Company drilled and completed three vertical wells, all with a working interest of 100%.

    Quarter   Area   Wells Drilled   Wells Completed
                 
    1Q 2025   Northwest Shelf (Horizontal)   4   4
        Central Basin Platform (Horizontal)    
        Central Basin Platform (Vertical)   3   3
        Total   7   7


    Acquisition – CBP Assets of Lime Rock

    During 1Q 2025, Ring completed the acquisition of CBP assets from Lime Rock. Those properties are located in the Permian Basin in Andrews County, Texas, and are focused on the development of approximately 17,700 net acres where the majority are similar to Ring’s existing CBP assets in the Shafter Lake area, and the remaining acreage exposes the Company to new active plays.

    The key transaction highlights include:

    • Highly Accretive: ~2,300 Boe/d (>75% oil) of low-decline net production from ~101 gross wells;
    • Increased Scale and Operational Synergies: ~17,700 net acres (100% HBP) mostly contiguous to Ring’s existing footprint;
    • Meaningful AFCF Generation: Supported by $121 million of oil-weighted reserves (based on NYMEX strip pricing as of February 19, 2025; and
    • Strengthens High-Return Inventory Portfolio: >40 gross locations that immediately compete for capital.

    After taking into account preliminary purchase price adjustments, consideration for the acquisition consisted of:

    • A cash payment of approximately $63.6 million net of the $5.0 million deposit payment made in February;
    • $10.0 million deferred cash payment due on or about December 31, 2025; and
    • The issuance of approximately 6.5 million shares of common stock.

    The cash payment at closing on March 31, 2025 was funded with cash on hand and borrowings under Ring’s senior revolving credit facility.

    Balance Sheet and Liquidity

    Total liquidity (defined as cash and cash equivalents plus borrowing base availability under the Company’s credit facility) at March 31, 2025 was approximately $141.1 million, consisting of $140.0 million of availability under Ring’s revolving credit facility, which included a reduction of $35 thousand for letters of credit, and $1.1 million in cash and cash equivalents. On March 31, 2025, the Company had $460 million in borrowings outstanding on its credit facility that has a current borrowing base of $600 million and reflects the draw on the revolving credit facility to fund the Lime Rock Acquisition. The Company is targeting continued debt reduction, dependent on market conditions, the timing and level of capital spending, and other considerations.

    Second Half of 2025 Sales Volumes, Capital Investment and Operating Expense Guidance

    Ring’s 2025 development program has been updated to reflect a reduction in capital spending in response to the weakened price environment. For full year 2025, Ring now expects total capital spending of $85 million to $113 million (versus $138 million to $170 million previously disclosed). In addition to wells that the Company plans to drill and complete, the full year capital spending program includes funds for targeted well recompletions, capital workovers, infrastructure upgrades, reactivations, and leasing costs, as well as non-operated drilling, completion, capital workovers, and facility improvements.

    All projects and estimates are based on assumed WTI oil prices of $50 to $70 per barrel and Henry Hub prices of $3.00 to $4.00 per Mcf. As in the past, Ring has designed its spending program with flexibility to respond to changes in commodity prices and other market conditions as appropriate.

    Based on the $99 million midpoint of spending guidance, the Company continues to expect the following estimated allocation of capital, including:

    • 61% for drilling, completion, and related infrastructure;
    • 33% for recompletions and capital workovers;
    • 4% for facility improvements (environmental and emission reducing upgrades); and
    • 2% for land, non-operated capital, and other.

    The guidance in the table below represents the Company’s current good faith estimate of the range of likely future results. Guidance could be affected by the factors discussed below in the “Safe Harbor Statement” section.

        Q2 2H
        2025 2025
    Sales Volumes:      
    Total Oil (Bo/d)   13,700 – 14,700 12,500 – 14,000
    Midpoint (Bo/d)   14,200 13,250
    Total (Boe/d)   20,500 – 22,500 19,000 – 21,000
    Midpoint (Boe/d)   21,500 20,000
    Oil (%)   66% 66%
    NGLs (%)   18% 18%
    Gas (%)   16% 16%
           
    Capital Program:      
    Capital spending(1) (millions)   $14 – $22 $38 – $58
    Midpoint (millions)   $18 $48
    New Hz and vertical wells (2)   2 – 3 11 – 13
    Recompletions and CTRs   6 – 8 17 – 22
           
    Operating Expenses:      
    LOE (per Boe)   $11.50 – $12.50 $11.50 – $12.50
    Midpoint (per Boe)   $12.00 $12.00


    (1)
    In addition to Company-directed drilling and completion activities, the capital spending outlook includes funds for targeted well recompletions, capital workovers, infrastructure upgrades, and well reactivations. Also included is anticipated spending for leasing acreage; and non-operated drilling, completion, capital workovers, and facility improvements.
    (2) Includes wells drilled, completed, and placed online.

    Conference Call Information

    Ring will hold a conference call on Thursday, May 8, 2025 at 12:00 p.m. ET (11 a.m. CT) to discuss its 1Q 2025 operational and financial results. An updated investor presentation will be posted to the Company’s website prior to the conference call.

    To participate in the conference call, interested parties should dial 833-953-2433 at least five minutes before the call is to begin. Please reference the “Ring Energy 1Q 2025 Earnings Conference Call”. International callers may participate by dialing 412-317-5762. The call will also be webcast and available on Ring’s website at www.ringenergy.com under “Investors” on the “News & Events” page. An audio replay will also be available on the Company’s website following the call.

    About Ring Energy, Inc.

    Ring Energy, Inc. is an oil and gas exploration, development, and production company with current operations focused on the development of its Permian Basin assets. For additional information, please visit www.ringenergy.com

    Safe Harbor Statement

    This release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Forward-looking statements involve a wide variety of risks and uncertainties, and include, without limitation, statements with respect to the Company’s strategy and prospects. The forward-looking statements include statements about the expected future reserves, production, financial position, business strategy, revenues, earnings, costs, capital expenditures and debt levels of the Company, expected benefits to the Company and its stockholders from the Lime Rock Acquisition, and plans and objectives of management for future operations. Forward-looking statements also include assumptions and projections for second quarter and full year 2025 guidance for sales volumes, oil mix as a percentage of total sales, capital expenditures, operating expenses and the projected impacts thereon, and the number of wells expected to be drilled and completed. Forward-looking statements are based on current expectations and assumptions and analyses made by Ring and its management in light of their experience and perception of historical trends, current conditions and expected future developments, as well as other factors appropriate under the circumstances. However, whether actual results and developments will conform to expectations is subject to a number of material risks and uncertainties, including but not limited to: declines in oil, natural gas liquids or natural gas prices; the level of success in exploration, development and production activities; adverse weather conditions that may negatively impact development or production activities particularly in the winter; the timing of exploration and development expenditures; inaccuracies of reserve estimates or assumptions underlying them; revisions to reserve estimates as a result of changes in commodity prices; impacts to financial statements as a result of impairment write-downs; risks related to level of indebtedness and periodic redeterminations of the borrowing base and interest rates under the Company’s credit facility; Ring’s ability to generate sufficient cash flows from operations to meet the internally funded portion of its capital expenditures budget; the impacts of hedging on results of operations; changes in U.S. energy, environmental, monetary and trade policies, including with respect to tariffs or other trade barriers, and any resulting trade tensions; cost and availability of transportation and storage capacity as a result of oversupply, government regulation or other factors; and Ring’s ability to replace oil and natural gas reserves. Such statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties which are disclosed in the Company’s reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), including its Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, and its other SEC filings. Ring undertakes no obligation to revise or update publicly any forward-looking statements, except as required by law.

    Contact Information

    Al Petrie Advisors
    Al Petrie, Senior Partner
    Phone: 281-975-2146
    Email: apetrie@ringenergy.com

     
    RING ENERGY, INC. 
    Condensed Statements of Operations 
    (Unaudited)
     
        Three Months Ended
        March 31,   December 31,   March 31,
          2025       2024       2024  
                 
    Oil, Natural Gas, and Natural Gas Liquids Revenues   $ 79,091,207     $ 83,440,546     $ 94,503,136  
                 
    Costs and Operating Expenses            
    Lease operating expenses     19,677,552       20,326,216       18,360,434  
    Gathering, transportation and processing costs     203,612       130,230       166,054  
    Ad valorem taxes     1,532,108       2,421,595       2,145,631  
    Oil and natural gas production taxes     3,584,455       3,857,147       4,428,303  
    Depreciation, depletion and amortization     22,615,983       24,548,849       23,792,450  
    Asset retirement obligation accretion     326,549       323,085       350,834  
    Operating lease expense     175,091       175,090       175,091  
    General and administrative expense     8,619,976       8,035,977       7,469,222  
                 
    Total Costs and Operating Expenses     56,735,326       59,818,189       56,888,019  
                 
    Income from Operations     22,355,881       23,622,357       37,615,117  
                 
    Other Income (Expense)            
    Interest income     90,058       124,765       78,544  
    Interest (expense)     (9,498,786 )     (10,112,496 )     (11,498,944 )
    Gain (loss) on derivative contracts     (928,790 )     (6,254,448 )     (19,014,495 )
    Gain (loss) on disposal of assets     124,610             38,355  
    Other income     8,942       80,970       25,686  
    Net Other Income (Expense)     (10,203,966 )     (16,161,209 )     (30,370,854 )
                 
    Income Before Benefit from (Provision for) Income Taxes     12,151,915       7,461,148       7,244,263  
                 
    Benefit from (Provision for) Income Taxes     (3,041,177 )     (1,803,629 )     (1,728,886 )
                 
    Net Income (Loss)   $ 9,110,738     $ 5,657,519     $ 5,515,377  
                 
    Basic Earnings (Loss) per Share   $ 0.05     $ 0.03     $ 0.03  
    Diluted Earnings (Loss) per Share   $ 0.05     $ 0.03     $ 0.03  
                 
    Basic Weighted-Average Shares Outstanding     199,314,182       198,166,543       197,389,782  
    Diluted Weighted-Average Shares Outstanding     201,072,594       200,886,010       199,305,150  
                             
    RING ENERGY, INC.
    Condensed Operating Data
    (Unaudited)
     
        Three Months Ended
        March 31,   December 31,   March 31,
          2025       2024       2024  
                 
    Net sales volumes:            
    Oil (Bbls)     1,086,694       1,188,272       1,218,837  
    Natural gas (Mcf)     1,615,196       1,683,793       1,496,507  
    Natural gas liquids (Bbls)     299,366       339,589       263,802  
    Total oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids (Boe)(1)     1,655,259       1,808,493       1,732,057  
                 
    % Oil     66 %     66 %     70 %
    % Natural Gas     16 %     15 %     15 %
    % Natural Gas Liquids     18 %     19 %     15 %
                 
    Average daily sales volumes:            
    Oil (Bbls/d)     12,074       12,916       13,394  
    Natural gas (Mcf/d)     17,947       18,302       16,445  
    Natural gas liquids (Bbls/d)     3,326       3,691       2,899  
    Average daily equivalent sales (Boe/d)     18,392       19,658       19,034  
                 
    Average realized sales prices:            
    Oil ($/Bbl)   $ 70.40     $ 68.98     $ 75.72  
    Natural gas ($/Mcf)     (0.19 )     (0.96 )     (0.55 )
    Natural gas liquids ($/Bbls)     9.65       9.08       11.47  
    Barrel of oil equivalent ($/Boe)   $ 47.78     $ 46.14     $ 54.56  
                 
    Average costs and expenses per Boe ($/Boe):            
    Lease operating expenses   $ 11.89     $ 11.24     $ 10.60  
    Gathering, transportation and processing costs     0.12       0.07       0.10  
    Ad valorem taxes     0.93       1.34       1.24  
    Oil and natural gas production taxes     2.17       2.13       2.56  
    Depreciation, depletion and amortization     13.66       13.57       13.74  
    Asset retirement obligation accretion     0.20       0.18       0.20  
    Operating lease expense     0.11       0.10       0.10  
    G&A (including share-based compensation)     5.21       4.44       4.31  
    G&A (excluding share-based compensation)     4.19       3.52       3.32  
    G&A (excluding share-based compensation and transaction costs)     4.18       3.51       3.32  
                             

    (1) Boe is determined using the ratio of six Mcf of natural gas to one Bbl of oil (totals may not compute due to rounding.) The conversion ratio does not assume price equivalency and the price on an equivalent basis for oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids may differ significantly.

     
    RING ENERGY, INC.
    Condensed Balance Sheet 
    (Unaudited)
        As of
        March 31, 2025   December 31, 2024
    ASSETS        
    Current Assets        
    Cash and cash equivalents   $ 1,100,851     $ 1,866,395  
    Accounts receivable     35,680,686       36,172,316  
    Joint interest billing receivables, net     2,121,035       1,083,164  
    Derivative assets     5,309,892       5,497,057  
    Inventory     3,300,755       4,047,819  
    Prepaid expenses and other assets     1,156,529       1,781,341  
    Total Current Assets     48,669,748       50,448,092  
    Properties and Equipment        
    Oil and natural gas properties, full cost method     1,932,616,777       1,809,309,848  
    Financing lease asset subject to depreciation     4,272,259       4,634,556  
    Fixed assets subject to depreciation     3,359,292       3,389,907  
    Total Properties and Equipment     1,940,248,328       1,817,334,311  
    Accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization     (496,993,139 )     (475,212,325 )
    Net Properties and Equipment     1,443,255,189       1,342,121,986  
    Operating lease asset     1,753,693       1,906,264  
    Derivative assets     5,020,380       5,473,375  
    Deferred financing costs     6,911,264       8,149,757  
    Total Assets   $ 1,505,610,274     $ 1,408,099,474  
             
    LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY        
    Current Liabilities        
    Accounts payable   $ 86,417,436     $ 95,729,261  
    Income tax liability     537,591       328,985  
    Financing lease liability     846,380       906,119  
    Operating lease liability     661,487       648,204  
    Derivative liabilities     5,426,195       6,410,547  
    Notes payable           496,397  
    Deferred cash payment     9,415,066        
    Asset retirement obligations     441,611       517,674  
    Total Current Liabilities     103,745,766       105,037,187  
             
    Non-current Liabilities        
    Deferred income taxes     31,496,585       28,591,802  
    Revolving line of credit     460,000,000       385,000,000  
    Financing lease liability, less current portion     708,304       647,078  
    Operating lease liability, less current portion     1,234,690       1,405,837  
    Derivative liabilities     3,632,133       2,912,745  
    Asset retirement obligations     28,826,738       25,864,843  
    Total Liabilities     629,644,216       549,459,492  
    Commitments and contingencies        
    Stockholders’ Equity        
    Preferred stock – $0.001 par value; 50,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued or outstanding            
    Common stock – $0.001 par value; 450,000,000 shares authorized; 206,509,126 shares and 198,561,378 shares issued and outstanding, respectively     206,509       198,561  
    Additional paid-in capital     808,627,109       800,419,719  
    Retained earnings (Accumulated deficit)     67,132,440       58,021,702  
    Total Stockholders’ Equity     875,966,058       858,639,982  
    Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity   $ 1,505,610,274     $ 1,408,099,474  
     
    RING ENERGY, INC.
    Condensed Statements of Cash Flows 
    (Unaudited)
     
        Three Months Ended
        March 31,   December 31,   March 31,
          2025       2024       2024  
    Cash Flows From Operating Activities            
    Net income   $ 9,110,738     $ 5,657,519     $ 5,515,377  
    Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:            
    Depreciation, depletion and amortization     22,615,983       24,548,849       23,792,450  
    Asset retirement obligation accretion     326,549       323,085       350,834  
    Amortization of deferred financing costs     1,238,493       1,299,078       1,221,607  
    Share-based compensation     1,690,958       1,672,320       1,723,832  
    Credit loss expense     17,917       (26,747 )     163,840  
    (Gain) loss on disposal of assets     (124,610 )            
    Deferred income tax expense (benefit)     2,805,346       1,723,338       1,585,445  
    Excess tax expense (benefit) related to share-based compensation     99,437       9,011       40,808  
    (Gain) loss on derivative contracts     928,790       6,254,448       19,014,495  
    Cash received (paid) for derivative settlements, net     (553,594 )     745,104       (1,461,515 )
    Changes in operating assets and liabilities:            
    Accounts receivable     (564,158 )     349,474       (5,240,487 )
    Inventory     747,064       580,161       171,416  
    Prepaid expenses and other assets     624,812       295,555       503,704  
    Accounts payable     (10,385,137 )     4,462,089       (1,601,276 )
    Settlement of asset retirement obligation     (207,580 )     (613,603 )     (591,361 )
    Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities     28,371,008       47,279,681       45,189,169  
                 
    Cash Flows From Investing Activities            
    Payments for the Lime Rock Acquisition     (70,859,769 )            
    Payments to purchase oil and natural gas properties     (647,106 )     (1,423,483 )     (475,858 )
    Payments to develop oil and natural gas properties     (31,083,507 )     (36,386,055 )     (38,904,808 )
    Payments to acquire or improve fixed assets subject to depreciation     (34,275 )           (124,937 )
    Proceeds from sale of fixed assets subject to depreciation     17,360              
    Proceeds from divestiture of equipment for oil and natural gas properties           121,232        
    Net Cash Used in Investing Activities     (102,607,297 )     (37,688,306 )     (39,505,603 )
                 
    Cash Flows From Financing Activities            
    Proceeds from revolving line of credit     114,000,000       22,000,000       51,500,000  
    Payments on revolving line of credit     (39,000,000 )     (29,000,000 )     (54,500,000 )
    Payments for taxes withheld on vested restricted shares, net     (896,431 )           (814,985 )
    Proceeds from notes payable           58,774        
    Payments on notes payable     (496,397 )     (475,196 )     (533,734 )
    Payment of deferred financing costs           (42,746 )      
    Reduction of financing lease liabilities     (136,427 )     (265,812 )     (255,156 )
    Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Financing Activities     73,470,745       (7,724,980 )     (4,603,875 )
                 
    Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash     (765,544 )     1,866,395       1,079,691  
    Cash at Beginning of Period     1,866,395             296,384  
    Cash at End of Period   $ 1,100,851     $ 1,866,395     $ 1,376,075  
     
    RING ENERGY, INC.
    Financial Commodity Derivative Positions 
    As of March 31, 2025
     
    The following tables reflect the details of current derivative contracts as of March 31, 2025 (quantities are in barrels (Bbl) for the oil derivative contracts and in million British thermal units (MMBtu) for the natural gas derivative contracts):
     
        Oil Hedges (WTI)
        Q2 2025   Q3 2025   Q4 2025   Q1 2026   Q2 2026   Q3 2026   Q4 2026   Q1 2027
                                     
    Swaps:                                
    Hedged volume (Bbl)     151,763     351,917     141,755     477,350     457,101     59,400     423,000     381,500
    Weighted average swap price   $ 68.53   $ 71.41   $ 69.13   $ 70.16   $ 69.38   $ 66.70   $ 66.70   $ 63.80
                                     
    Two-way collars:                                
    Hedged volume (Bbl)     464,100     225,400     404,800             379,685        
    Weighted average put price   $ 60.00   $ 65.00   $ 60.00   $   $   $ 60.00   $   $
    Weighted average call price   $ 69.85   $ 78.91   $ 75.68   $   $   $ 72.50   $   $
        Gas Hedges (Henry Hub)
        Q2 2025   Q3 2025   Q4 2025   Q1 2026   Q2 2026   Q3 2026   Q4 2026   Q1 2027
                                     
    NYMEX Swaps:                                
    Hedged volume (MMBtu)     513,900     455,250     128,400     140,600     662,300     121,400     613,300    
    Weighted average swap price   $ 3.60   $ 3.88   $ 4.25   $ 4.20   $ 3.54   $ 4.22   $ 3.83   $
                                     
    Two-way collars:                                
    Hedged volume (MMBtu)     18,300     308,200     598,000     553,500         515,728         700,000
    Weighted average put price   $ 3.00   $ 3.00   $ 3.00   $ 3.50   $   $ 3.00   $   $ 4.00
    Weighted average call price   $ 4.15   $ 4.75   $ 4.15   $ 5.03   $   $ 3.93   $   $ 5.20
        Oil Hedges (basis differential)
        Q2 2025   Q3 2025   Q4 2025   Q1 2026   Q2 2026   Q3 2026   Q4 2026   Q1 2027
                                     
    Argus basis swaps:                                
    Hedged volume (Bbl)     183,000     276,000     276,000                    
    Weighted average spread price (1)   $ 1.00   $ 1.00   $ 1.00   $   $   $   $   $
                                     
        Gas Hedges (basis differential)
        Q2 2025   Q3 2025   Q4 2025   Q1 2026   Q2 2026   Q3 2026   Q4 2026   Q1 2027
                                     
    El Paso Permian Basin basis swaps:                                
    Hedged volume (MMBtu)                                 700,000
    Weighted average spread price (2)   $   $   $   $   $   $   $   $ 0.74
                                                     

    (1) The oil basis swap hedges are calculated as the fixed price (weighted average spread price above) less the difference between WTI Midland and WTI Cushing, in the issue of Argus Americas Crude.

    (2) The gas basis swap hedges are calculated as the Henry Hub natural gas price less the fixed amount specified as the weighted average spread price above.

    RING ENERGY, INC.
    Non-GAAP Financial Information

    Certain financial information included in this release are not measures of financial performance recognized by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”). These non-GAAP financial measures are “Adjusted Net Income,” “Adjusted EBITDA,” “Adjusted Free Cash Flow” or “AFCF,” “Adjusted Cash Flow from Operations” or “ACFFO,” “G&A Excluding Share-Based Compensation,” “G&A Excluding Share-Based Compensation and Transaction Costs,” “Leverage Ratio,” “All-In Cash Operating Costs,” and “Cash Operating Margin.” Management uses these non-GAAP financial measures in its analysis of performance. These disclosures may not be viewed as a substitute for results determined in accordance with GAAP and are not necessarily comparable to non-GAAP performance measures which may be reported by other companies.

    Reconciliation of Net income to Adjusted Net Income

    “Adjusted Net Income” is calculated as net income minus the estimated after-tax impact of share-based compensation, ceiling test impairment, unrealized gains and losses on changes in the fair value of derivatives, and transaction costs for executed acquisitions and divestitures (“A&D”). Adjusted Net Income is presented because the timing and amount of these items cannot be reasonably estimated and affect the comparability of operating results from period to period, and current period to prior periods. The Company believes that the presentation of Adjusted Net Income provides useful information to investors as it is one of the metrics management uses to assess the Company’s ongoing operating and financial performance, and also is a useful metric for investors to compare Ring’s results with its peers.

         
        (Unaudited for All Periods)
        Three Months Ended
        March 31,   December 31,   March 31,
          2025       2024       2024  
        Total   Per
    share –
    diluted
      Total   Per
    share –
    diluted
      Total   Per
    share –
    diluted
    Net income   $ 9,110,738     $ 0.05     $ 5,657,519     $ 0.03     $ 5,515,377     $ 0.03  
                             
    Share-based compensation     1,690,958       0.01       1,672,320       0.01       1,723,832       0.01  
    Unrealized loss (gain) on change in fair value of derivatives     375,196             6,999,552       0.03       17,552,980       0.08  
    Transaction costs – executed A&D     1,776             21,017             3,539        
    Tax impact on adjusted items     (500,646 )     (0.01 )     (2,008,740 )     (0.01 )     (4,447,977 )     (0.02 )
                             
    Adjusted Net Income   $ 10,678,022     $ 0.05     $ 12,341,668     $ 0.06     $ 20,347,751     $ 0.10  
                             
    Diluted Weighted-Average Shares Outstanding     201,072,594           200,886,010           199,305,150      
                             
    Adjusted Net Income per Diluted Share   $ 0.05         $ 0.06         $ 0.10      


    Reconciliation of
    Net income to Adjusted EBITDA

    The Company defines “Adjusted EBITDA” as net income plus net interest expense (including interest income and expense), unrealized loss (gain) on change in fair value of derivatives, ceiling test impairment, income tax (benefit) expense, depreciation, depletion and amortization, asset retirement obligation accretion, transaction costs for executed acquisitions and divestitures (A&D), share-based compensation, loss (gain) on disposal of assets, and backing out the effect of other income. Company management believes Adjusted EBITDA is relevant and useful because it helps investors understand Ring’s operating performance and makes it easier to compare its results with those of other companies that have different financing, capital and tax structures. Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered in isolation from or as a substitute for net income, as an indication of operating performance or cash flows from operating activities or as a measure of liquidity. Adjusted EBITDA, as Ring calculates it, may not be comparable to Adjusted EBITDA measures reported by other companies. In addition, Adjusted EBITDA does not represent funds available for discretionary use.

        (Unaudited for All Periods)
        Three Months Ended
        March 31,   December 31,   March 31,
          2025       2024       2024  
    Net income   $ 9,110,738     $ 5,657,519     $ 5,515,377  
                 
    Interest expense, net     9,408,728       9,987,731       11,420,400  
    Unrealized loss (gain) on change in fair value of derivatives     375,196       6,999,552       17,552,980  
    Income tax (benefit) expense     3,041,177       1,803,629       1,728,886  
    Depreciation, depletion and amortization     22,615,983       24,548,849       23,792,450  
    Asset retirement obligation accretion     326,549       323,085       350,834  
    Transaction costs – executed A&D     1,776       21,017       3,539  
    Share-based compensation     1,690,958       1,672,320       1,723,832  
    Loss (gain) on disposal of assets     (124,610 )           (38,355 )
    Other income     (8,942 )     (80,970 )     (25,686 )
                 
    Adjusted EBITDA   $ 46,437,553     $ 50,932,732     $ 62,024,257  
                 
    Adjusted EBITDA Margin     59 %     61 %     66 %
                             

    Reconciliations of Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities to Adjusted Free Cash Flow and Adjusted EBITDA to Adjusted Free Cash Flow

    The Company defines “Adjusted Free Cash Flow” or “AFCF” as Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities less changes in operating assets and liabilities (as reflected on Ring’s Condensed Statements of Cash Flows), plus transaction costs for executed acquisitions and divestitures (A&D), current income tax expense (benefit), proceeds from divestitures of equipment for oil and natural gas properties, loss (gain) on disposal of assets, and less capital expenditures, credit loss expense, and other income. For this purpose, the Company’s definition of capital expenditures includes costs incurred related to oil and natural gas properties (such as drilling and infrastructure costs and lease maintenance costs) but excludes acquisition costs of oil and gas properties from third parties that are not included in Ring’s capital expenditures guidance provided to investors. Management believes that Adjusted Free Cash Flow is an important financial performance measure for use in evaluating the performance and efficiency of the Company’s current operating activities after the impact of capital expenditures and net interest expense (including interest income and expense, excluding amortization of deferred financing costs) and without being impacted by items such as changes associated with working capital, which can vary substantially from one period to another. Other companies may use different definitions of Adjusted Free Cash Flow.

         
        (Unaudited for All Periods)
        Three Months Ended
        March 31,   December 31,   March 31,
          2025       2024       2024  
                 
    Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities   $ 28,371,008     $ 47,279,681     $ 45,189,169  
    Adjustments – Condensed Statements of Cash Flows            
    Changes in operating assets and liabilities     9,784,999       (5,073,676 )     6,758,004  
    Transaction costs – executed A&D     1,776       21,017       3,539  
    Income tax expense (benefit) – current     136,393       71,280       102,633  
    Capital expenditures     (32,451,531 )     (37,633,168 )     (36,261,008 )
    Proceeds from divestiture of equipment for oil and natural gas properties           121,232        
    Credit loss expense     (17,917 )     26,747       (163,840 )
    Loss (gain) on disposal of assets                 (38,355 )
    Other income     (8,942 )     (80,970 )     (25,686 )
                 
    Adjusted Free Cash Flow   $ 5,815,786     $ 4,732,143     $ 15,564,456  
        (Unaudited for All Periods)
        Three Months Ended
        March 31,   December 31,   March 31,
          2025       2024       2024  
                 
    Adjusted EBITDA   $ 46,437,553     $ 50,932,732     $ 62,024,257  
                 
    Net interest expense (excluding amortization of deferred financing costs)     (8,170,235 )     (8,688,653 )     (10,198,793 )
    Capital expenditures     (32,451,531 )     (37,633,168 )     (36,261,008 )
    Proceeds from divestiture of equipment for oil and natural gas properties           121,232        
                 
    Adjusted Free Cash Flow   $ 5,815,787     $ 4,732,143     $ 15,564,456  


    Reconciliation of Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities to Adjusted Cash Flow from Operations

    The Company defines “Adjusted Cash Flow from Operations” or “ACFFO” as Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities, as reflected in Ring’s Condensed Statements of Cash Flows, less the changes in operating assets and liabilities, which includes accounts receivable, inventory, prepaid expenses and other assets, accounts payable, and settlement of asset retirement obligations, which are subject to variation due to the nature of the Company’s operations. Accordingly, the Company believes this non-GAAP measure is useful to investors because it is used often in its industry and allows investors to compare this metric to other companies in its peer group as well as the E&P sector.

         
        (Unaudited for All Periods)
        Three Months Ended
        March 31,   December 31,   March 31,
          2025     2024       2024
                 
    Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities   $ 28,371,008   $ 47,279,681     $ 45,189,169
                 
    Changes in operating assets and liabilities     9,784,999     (5,073,676 )     6,758,004
                 
    Adjusted Cash Flow from Operations   $ 38,156,007   $ 42,206,005     $ 51,947,173


    Reconciliation of General and Administrative Expense (G&A) to G&A Excluding Share-Based Compensation and Transaction Costs

    The following table presents a reconciliation of General and Administrative Expense (“G&A”), a GAAP measure, to G&A excluding share-based compensation, and G&A excluding share-based compensation and transaction costs for executed acquisitions and divestitures (A&D).

         
        (Unaudited for All Periods)
        Three Months Ended
        March 31,   December 31,   March 31,
          2025     2024     2024
                 
    General and administrative expense (G&A)   $ 8,619,976   $ 8,035,977   $ 7,469,222
    Shared-based compensation     1,690,958     1,672,320     1,723,832
    G&A excluding share-based compensation     6,929,018     6,363,657     5,745,390
    Transaction costs – executed A&D     1,776     21,017     3,539
    G&A excluding share-based compensation and transaction costs   $ 6,927,242   $ 6,342,640   $ 5,741,851


    Calculation of Leverage Ratio

    “Leverage” or the “Leverage Ratio” is calculated under the Company’s existing senior revolving credit facility and means as of any date, the ratio of (i) Consolidated total debt as of such date to (ii) Consolidated EBITDAX for the four consecutive fiscal quarters ending on or immediately prior to such date for which financial statements are required to have been delivered under the Company’s existing senior revolving credit facility.

    The Company defines “Consolidated EBITDAX” in accordance with its existing senior revolving credit facility that means for any period an amount equal to the sum of (i) consolidated net income (loss) for such period plus (ii) to the extent deducted in determining consolidated net income for such period, and without duplication, (A) consolidated interest expense, (B) income tax expense determined on a consolidated basis in accordance with GAAP, (C) depreciation, depletion and amortization determined on a consolidated basis in accordance with GAAP, (D) exploration expenses determined on a consolidated basis in accordance with GAAP, and (E) all other non-cash charges acceptable to Ring’s senior revolving credit facility administrative agent determined on a consolidated basis in accordance with GAAP, in each case for such period minus (iii) all noncash income added to consolidated net income (loss) for such period; provided that, for purposes of calculating compliance with the financial covenants, to the extent that during such period the Company shall have consummated an acquisition permitted by the credit facility or any sale, transfer or other disposition of any property or assets permitted by the senior revolving credit facility, Consolidated EBITDAX will be calculated on a pro forma basis with respect to the property or assets so acquired or disposed of.

    Also set forth in Ring’s existing senior revolving credit facility is the maximum permitted Leverage Ratio of 3.00. The following tables show the leverage ratio calculations for the quarters ended March 31, 2025 and March 31, 2024.

     
        (Unaudited)
        Three Months Ended    
        June 30,   September 30,   December 31,   March 31,   Last Four
    Quarters
          2024       2024       2024     2025  
    Consolidated EBITDAX Calculation:                    
    Net Income (Loss)   $ 22,418,994     $ 33,878,424     $ 5,657,519   $ 9,110,738   $ 71,065,675  
    Plus: Consolidated interest expense     10,801,194       10,610,539       9,987,731     9,408,728     40,808,192  
    Plus: Income tax provision (benefit)     6,820,485       10,087,954       1,803,629     3,041,177     21,753,245  
    Plus: Depreciation, depletion and amortization     24,699,421       25,662,123       24,548,849     22,615,983     97,526,376  
    Plus: non-cash charges acceptable to Administrative Agent     1,664,064       (26,228,108 )     8,994,957     2,392,703     (13,176,384 )
    Consolidated EBITDAX   $ 66,404,158     $ 54,010,932     $ 50,992,685   $ 46,569,329   $ 217,977,104  
    Plus: Pro Forma Acquired Consolidated EBITDAX     10,329,116       7,838,163       5,244,078     7,392,359     30,803,716  
    Less: Pro Forma Divested Consolidated EBITDAX     (469,376 )     (600,460 )     77,819     8,855     (983,162 )
    Pro Forma Consolidated EBITDAX   $ 76,263,898     $ 61,248,635     $ 56,314,582   $ 53,970,543   $ 247,797,658  
                         
    Non-cash charges acceptable to Administrative Agent:                    
    Asset retirement obligation accretion   $ 352,184     $ 354,195     $ 323,085   $ 326,549    
    Unrealized loss (gain) on derivative assets     (765,898 )     (26,614,390 )     6,999,552     375,196    
    Share-based compensation     2,077,778       32,087       1,672,320     1,690,958    
    Total non-cash charges acceptable to Administrative Agent   $ 1,664,064     $ (26,228,108 )   $ 8,994,957   $ 2,392,703    
                         
        As of                
        March 31,   Corresponding            
          2025     Leverage Ratio            
    Leverage Ratio Covenant:                    
    Revolving line of credit   $ 460,000,000       1.86              
    Lime Rock deferred payment     10,000,000       0.04              
    Consolidated Total Debt   $ 470,000,000       1.90              
    Pro Forma Consolidated EBITDAX     247,797,658                  
    Leverage Ratio     1.90                  
    Maximum Allowed     ≤ 3.00x                  
                             
        (Unaudited)
        Three Months Ended    
        June 30,   September 30,   December 31,   March 31,   Last Four
    Quarters
          2023       2023       2023       2024  
    Consolidated EBITDAX Calculation:                    
    Net Income (Loss)   $ 28,791,605     $ (7,539,222 )   $ 50,896,479     $ 5,515,377   $ 77,664,239  
    Plus: Consolidated interest expense     10,471,062       11,301,328       11,506,908       11,420,400     44,699,698  
    Plus: Income tax provision (benefit)     (6,356,295 )     (3,411,336 )     7,862,930       1,728,886     (175,815 )
    Plus: Depreciation, depletion and amortization     20,792,932       21,989,034       24,556,654       23,792,450     91,131,070  
    Plus: non-cash charges acceptable to Administrative Agent     (470,875 )     36,396,867       (29,695,076 )     19,627,646     25,858,562  
    Consolidated EBITDAX   $ 53,228,429     $ 58,736,671     $ 65,127,895     $ 62,084,759   $ 239,177,754  
    Plus: Pro Forma Acquired Consolidated EBITDAX     9,542,529       4,810,123                 14,352,652  
    Less: Pro Forma Divested Consolidated EBITDAX     (357,122 )     (672,113 )     (66,463 )     40,474     (1,055,224 )
    Pro Forma Consolidated EBITDAX   $ 62,413,836     $ 62,874,681     $ 65,061,432     $ 62,125,233   $ 252,475,182  
                         
    Non-cash charges acceptable to Administrative Agent:                    
    Asset retirement obligation accretion   $ 353,878     $ 354,175     $ 351,786     $ 350,834    
    Unrealized loss (gain) on derivative assets     (3,085,065 )     33,871,957       (32,505,544 )     17,552,980    
    Share-based compensation     2,260,312       2,170,735       2,458,682       1,723,832    
    Total non-cash charges acceptable to Administrative Agent   $ (470,875 )   $ 36,396,867     $ (29,695,076 )   $ 19,627,646    
                         
        As of                
        March 31,                
          2024                  
    Leverage Ratio Covenant:                    
    Revolving line of credit   $ 422,000,000                  
    Pro Forma Consolidated EBITDAX     252,475,182                  
    Leverage Ratio     1.67                  
    Maximum Allowed     ≤ 3.00x                  
                             

    All-In Cash Operating Costs

    The Company defines All-In Cash Operating Costs, a non-GAAP financial measure, as “all in cash” costs which includes lease operating expenses, G&A costs excluding share-based compensation, net interest expense (including interest income and expense, excluding amortization of deferred financing costs), workovers and other operating expenses, production taxes, ad valorem taxes, and gathering/transportation costs. Management believes that this metric provides useful additional information to investors to assess the Company’s operating costs in comparison to its peers, which may vary from company to company.

         
        (Unaudited for All Periods)
        Three Months Ended
        March 31,   December 31,   March 31,
          2025     2024     2024
    All-In Cash Operating Costs:            
    Lease operating expenses (including workovers)   $ 19,677,552   $ 20,326,216   $ 18,360,434
    G&A excluding share-based compensation     6,929,018     6,363,657     5,745,390
    Net interest expense (excluding amortization of deferred financing costs)     8,170,235     8,688,653     10,198,793
    Operating lease expense     175,091     175,090     175,091
    Oil and natural gas production taxes     3,584,455     3,857,147     4,428,303
    Ad valorem taxes     1,532,108     2,421,595     2,145,631
    Gathering, transportation and processing costs     203,612     130,230     166,054
    All-in cash operating costs   $ 40,272,071   $ 41,962,588   $ 41,219,696
                 
    Boe     1,655,259     1,808,493     1,732,057
                 
    All-in cash operating costs per Boe   $ 24.33   $ 23.20   $ 23.80


    Cash Operating Margin

    The Company defines Cash Operating Margin, a non-GAAP financial measure, as realized revenues per Boe less all-in cash operating costs per Boe. Management believes that this metric provides useful additional information to investors to assess the Company’s operating margins in comparison to its peers, which may vary from company to company.

         
        (Unaudited for All Periods)
        Three Months Ended
        March 31,   December 31,   March 31,
         2025    2024    2024
    Cash Operating Margin            
    Realized revenues per Boe   $ 47.78   $ 46.14   $ 54.56
    All-in cash operating costs per Boe     24.33     23.20     23.80
    Cash Operating Margin per Boe   $ 23.45   $ 22.94   $ 30.76
     

    ______________________________________
    1
    A non-GAAP financial measure; see the “Non-GAAP Financial Information” section in this release for more information including reconciliations to the most comparable GAAP measures.

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI USA: Ernst’s “Made in America” Bill Earns Support of Iowans

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator Joni Ernst (R-IA)

    WASHINGTON – U.S. Senate Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship Chair Joni Ernst (R-Iowa) and House Small Business Committee Chairman Roger Williams’ (R-Texas) newly unveiled initiative to continue the domestic manufacturing explosion happening under President Trump has earned widespread praise.
    Business leaders in Iowa and across the country have applauded the bipartisan Made in America Manufacturing Finance Act that doubles the loan limit for Small Business Administration (SBA) manufacturing loans to bring back “Made in America.”
    What They Are Saying About the Made in America Manufacturing Finance Act:
    Iowa Association of Business and Industry
    “Iowa’s manufacturers are ready to grow, invest, and lead in the future of American manufacturing – but access to capital is critical,” said Nicole Crain, President. “The Made in America Manufacturing Finance Act is a commonsense solution that will empower small manufacturers to invest in the tools, technology, and facilities they need to compete globally. ABI applauds Senator Ernst and Chairman Williams for their leadership and commitment to strengthening U.S. manufacturing.”
    Iowa Bankers Association
    “The Iowa Bankers Association thanks Senator Joni Ernst for her leadership in proposing the Made in America Manufacturing Finance Act,” said Adam Gregg, President. “Bank leaders in Iowa have advocated for increasing the loan limits in these SBA programs with the goal of driving more investment in communities across the state of Iowa.  Manufacturing is an important piece of Iowa’s economy, and Iowa banks are proud partners in helping small businesses grow and expand.  This proposed legislation will make the work of our Iowa banks even more impactful.”
    Cedar Rapids Metro Economic Alliance
    “Manufacturing is a cornerstone of our region’s economic vitality,” said Barbra Solberg. “By increasing access to capital for small manufacturers, the Made in America Manufacturing Finance Act empowers businesses to expand, innovate and compete globally—while reinforcing our domestic supply chains. We commend Senator Ernst for her leadership as Chair of the Senate Small Business Committee and her commitment to addressing the financial needs of small manufacturers in today’s economy.”
    Greater Burlington Partnership
    “Increasing loan limits for small manufacturers strengthens the backbone of our local economy,” said Amy O’Brien, CEO. “This bipartisan effort will give more Iowa businesses the tools they need to expand operations, invest in new technology, and create quality jobs right here at home. As the cost of doing business continues to rise, we support the recommended increases in borrowing to accommodate our manufacturing businesses.”
    Job Creators Network
    “Senate Small Business Committee Chair Joni Ernst and House Small Business Committee Chairman Roger Williams are standing up for American small businesses by introducing the Made in America Manufacturing Finance Act,” said Alfredo Ortiz, CEO. “This legislation significantly expands access to credit for American manufacturers under the Small Business Administration’s 7(a) and 504 loan programs, providing American manufacturers with the funds they need to invest, expand, and create good manufacturing jobs. This legislation is especially important during this period of high interest rates and scarce access to capital. It will significantly help grow the productive economy and contribute to President Trump’s goal of reshoring critical manufacturing capacity. All legislators on both sides of the aisle should vigorously support it.”
    Small Business & Entrepreneurship Council
    “Increasing the SBA’s 7(a) and 504 loan program limits to $10 million for small manufacturers is a pragmatic reform that will provide entrepreneurs with a modernized level of resources needed to build, transform, or expand manufacturing facilities and capabilities in support of advanced U.S.-based manufacturing,” said Karen Kerrigan, President & CEO. “Small, entrepreneurial firms dominate U.S. manufacturing, and if our goal is to support their competitiveness, growth and innovative capacity, access to appropriate levels of capital is necessary. Leveling up these proven SBA loan programs will help to fuel manufacturing activity and innovation, which is so vital to U.S. economic growth, opportunity, and our global competitiveness. SBE Council strongly supports the Made in America Manufacturing Finance Act.”
    National Small Business Association
    “While the demand for broader access to capital is generalized across the entire small business ecosystem, capital-intensive industries, including manufacturing, face unique challenges,” said Todd McCracken, President & CEO. “Initial investments in these industries, as well as long term development costs and diversification are appreciably more capital intensive than other businesses, as even a small change could result in significant retooling and related costs. Commonsense changes to existing federal support programs for small manufacturers would go a long way to leveling the playing field and allowing American entrepreneurs to invest in the United States. That is why we are pleased to support the Made in America Manufacturing Finance Act of 2025, which would increase the maximum loans small manufacturing companies are eligible for under the existing 7(a) and 504 loan programs.”
    National Association of Development Companies
    “The time is now to increase the 504 manufacturing loan size and foster expansion opportunities for our nation’s small manufacturers,” said Rhonda Pointon, President & CEO. “The National Association of Development Companies (NADCO) and CDCs across the country strongly support the Made in America Manufacturing Finance Act (MAMFA). This legislation would raise the 504 manufacturing loan limit to $10 million – empowering small manufacturers to scale, strengthen domestic production, and create high-quality jobs.”
    National Association of Government Guaranteed Lenders
    “Often, manufacturers need large facilities and/or specialty equipment that can exceed the current SBA loan size limitations,” said Anthony Wilkinson, President & CEO. “Therefore, especially since it has been 15 years since the 7(a) Program maximum loan size was increased to $5 million, we believe that it would be appropriate to consider increasing that maximum to $10 million for loans to small business manufacturers as proposed in your legislation.”

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Russia: Beijing to host first World Humanoid Robot Games

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: People’s Republic of China in Russian – People’s Republic of China in Russian –

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    BEIJING, May 7 (Xinhua) — China’s capital Beijing will host the 2025 World Robot Conference and the first World Humanoid Robot Games in August, it was announced at a press conference on Wednesday.

    The Robotics Conference will run from August 8 to 12, and the Games from August 15 to 17. These events will showcase cutting-edge advances in robotics and foster greater global collaboration in the industry.

    According to the organizers, in 2025 the program of the World Robotics Conference includes forums, exhibitions and networking events, where about 200 specialized companies will present their latest developments.

    Vice Chairman of the Board and Secretary General of the China Electronics Society Chen Ying noted the expansion of international participation. More than 30 international organizations, over 30 world-renowned experts and over 100 international teams are expected to take part in the events. The share of foreign exhibitors will exceed 20 percent.

    The core program of the games, the world’s first multi-discipline competition for humanoid robots, will include tests of their athletic and functional skills in such disciplines as track and field, football, dance, carrying objects and sorting medicine. Additional competitions in badminton, table tennis and basketball will emphasize entertainment and interaction with spectators.

    According to Jiang Guangzhi, head of the Beijing City Bureau of Economy and Information Technology, the games will demonstrate how close robots’ capabilities are to the human ideal. –0–

    MIL OSI Russia News