NewzIntel.com

    • Checkout Page
    • Contact Us
    • Default Redirect Page
    • Frontpage
    • Home-2
    • Home-3
    • Lost Password
    • Member Login
    • Member LogOut
    • Member TOS Page
    • My Account
    • NewzIntel Alert Control-Panel
    • NewzIntel Latest Reports
    • Post Views Counter
    • Privacy Policy
    • Public Individual Page
    • Register
    • Subscription Plan
    • Thank You Page

Category: Transport

  • MIL-OSI USA: US Department of Labor honors fallen workers with national Workers Memorial Day program April 24

    Source: US Department of Labor

    The U.S. Department of Labor will honor workers whose jobs have claimed their lives during its national Workers Memorial Day program on April 24, 2025. 

    The department will welcome families traveling from across the country to the nation’s capital for the program, which pays tribute to men and women who have lost their lives while on the job, as well as all the fallen workers before them, and the survivors who remain to grieve and carry on.

    Today, work-related injuries in the U.S. claim about 15 people’s lives a day. In 2023, a reported 5,283 workers  suffered fatal injuries, a decrease of 203 worker deaths from 2022.

    U.S. Secretary of Labor Lori Chavez-DeRemer, Occupational Safety and Health Administration Acting Assistant Secretary Amanda Wood Laihow, and Mine Safety and Health Administration Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy James Paul McHugh will speak during this year’s Workers Memorial Day ceremony, which will be held at the department’s Washington headquarters at 1 p.m. EDT. The event will also be livestreamed. 

    Workers Memorial Day is observed on April 28 with local observances across the country that bring together workers, families, and unions in a shared commitment to preventing workplace hazards so that every worker can return home safely at the end of the day. 

    April 28 also marks a significant milestone in workplace safety – the anniversary of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration – which opened its doors in 1971 following the passage of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970. 

    Every worker has the right to a safe and healthy workplace. Ensuring workers’ well-being is a shared responsibility that demands ongoing collaboration among employers, labor unions, safety professionals, and workers. Reinforcing workplace protections and promoting a strong safety culture helps prevent tragedies and builds a future where every job is a safe, family-sustaining one.

    Learn more about Workers Memorial Day events nationwide.

    MIL OSI USA News –

    April 22, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Army Establishes New Fitness Test of Record to Strengthen Readiness and Lethality

    Source: United States Army

    WASHINGTON – The U.S. Army announced today the establishment of the Army Fitness Test (AFT) as the official physical fitness test of record for all Soldiers, replacing the Army Combat Fitness Test.

    The five-event AFT, is designed to enhance Soldier fitness, improve warfighting readiness, and increase the lethality of the force.

    The AFT consists of the three-repetition maximum deadlift, hand-release push-up army extension, sprint-drag-carry, plank, and two-mile run. RAND Corporation analysis and Army data from nearly 1 million test records helped inform the new standard.

    Phased implementation of the AFT will begin June 1, 2025, with new scoring standards for Soldiers in 21 combat military occupational specialties (MOSs) taking effect on January 1, 2026, for the active component and June 1, 2026, for the Reserve and National Guard.

    The AFT combat standard is sex-neutral and age-normed. Soldiers serving in combat specialties must achieve a minimum of 60 points per event and an overall minimum score of 350.

    The AFT general standard is performance-normed by sex and age groups. Soldiers serving in combat-enabling specialties must attain a score of at least 60 points per event and an overall minimum score of 300.

    Implementation guidance and associated execution orders will be released in May.

    The change reflects the Army’s continued focus on building a physically ready force capable of meeting operational demands in austere environments.

    The Army is also adapting its policy framework to support implementation, including support to Soldiers with medical profiles and governance to monitor the impact of the new standard on readiness, retention, and end strength.

    For more information contact:

    Matt Ahearn, Office of the Chief of Public Affairs-Media Relations Division

    Office: 703-697-5344 | Cell: 703-225-8135

    Email: timothy.m.ahearn2.civ@army.mil

    Press Desk: usarmy.pentagon.hqda-ocpa.mbx.mrd-press-desk@army.mil

    MIL OSI USA News –

    April 22, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Maryland Attorney Pleads Guilty to Not Paying Employment Taxes

    Source: US State Government of Utah

    A Maryland attorney pleaded guilty today for not paying employment taxes withheld from the employees of his law firm.

    The following is according to court documents and statements made in court: James E. McCollum Jr. was an attorney licensed to practice law in Maryland and the District of Columbia. From 1998 to 2024, McCollum was the sole proprietor of a law firm based in College Park, Maryland, which he operated using a series of business names, including McCollum P.C.; McCollum & Associates LLC; and The McCollum Firm LLC. Nevertheless, McCollum was always the sole owner and operator of the business.

    As such, McCollum exercised financial control over the firm, including hiring and supervising employees, operating the payroll, and maintaining signature authority over the business bank accounts. From at least 2000 onward, McCollum was responsible for withholding Social Security, Medicare, and federal income taxes from his employees’ wages and paying those funds over to the government each quarter. McCollum was also obligated to pay over the employer’s share of Social Security and Medicare taxes.

    The timely payment of these taxes is critical to the functioning of the U.S. government, because, for example, they are the primary source of funding for Social Security and Medicare. The federal income taxes that are withheld from employees’ wages also account for a significant portion of all federal income taxes collected each year.

    Over the last 24 years, McCollum, however, was frequently not compliant with his obligations to pay these taxes to the government or to file the necessary tax returns.

    Beginning in 2010, the IRS attempted to collect the unpaid employment taxes, issuing numerous notices and levies to the law firm. When the IRS was unable to collect the outstanding taxes from the firm, it assessed them against McCollum personally and tried to collect them from him as well.

    In 2020, instead of paying the taxes that were due, McCollum sought to thwart the IRS’s ongoing collection efforts by transferring his business and its employees to a new entity, The McCollum Firm. Yet, even after the transfer, McCollum continued to not file the requisite tax returns or pay the employment taxes over. McCollum acknowledged that from 2000 through 2024, he did not pay over at least approximately $2,174,992.83 in employment taxes.

    McCollum also acknowledged that he did not file his own individual income tax returns and did not pay $220,515 in individual income taxes due for the tax years 2020 through 2022.

    The court scheduled sentencing for Sept. 29. McCollum faces a maximum penalty of five years in prison for the failure to pay over employment taxes. A federal district court judge will determine any sentence after considering the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and other statutory factors. McCollum also faces a period of supervised release, restitution, and monetary penalties.

    Acting Deputy Assistant Attorney General Karen E. Kelly of the Justice Department’s Tax Division made the announcement.

    IRS Criminal Investigation is investigating the case.

    Assistant Chief Jorge Almonte and Trial Attorney Mark McDonald of the Justice Department’s Tax Division are prosecuting the case.

    MIL OSI USA News –

    April 22, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: Wintrust Financial Corporation Reports Record First Quarter 2025 Net Income

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    ROSEMONT, Ill., April 21, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Wintrust Financial Corporation (“Wintrust”, “the Company”, “we” or “our”) (Nasdaq: WTFC) announced record quarterly net income of $189.0 million, or $2.69 per diluted common share, for the first quarter of 2025, compared to net income of $185.4 million, or $2.63 per diluted common share in the fourth quarter of 2024. Pre-tax, pre-provision income (non-GAAP) totaled a record $277.0 million, compared to $270.1 million for the fourth quarter of 2024.

    Timothy S. Crane, President and Chief Executive Officer, commented, “Building on our record results in 2024, we are pleased with our strong start to the year. Our balanced business model supported disciplined loan growth, which was funded by robust deposit growth in the first quarter of 2025.”

    Additionally, Mr. Crane noted, “Net interest margin in the first quarter increased by five basis points to 3.56% compared to the fourth quarter of 2024. The improvement in net interest margin was primarily attributed to decreased funding costs. The higher net interest margin and balance sheet growth supported record net interest income levels in the first quarter of 2025.”

    Highlights of the first quarter of 2025:
    Comparative information to the fourth quarter of 2024, unless otherwise noted

    • Total loans increased by $653 million, or 6% annualized.
    • Total deposits increased by approximately $1.1 billion, or 8% annualized.
    • Total assets increased by $1.0 billion, or 6% annualized.
    • Net interest income increased to $526.5 million in the first quarter of 2025, compared to $525.1 million in the fourth quarter of 2024, supported by improvement in net interest margin and balance sheet growth.        
      • Net interest margin increased to 3.54% (3.56% on a fully taxable-equivalent basis, non-GAAP) during the first quarter of 2025.
    • Non-interest income and non-interest expense were relatively stable in the first quarter of 2025. Notable impacts were:
      • Net gains on investment securities totaled $3.2 million.
      • Macatawa Bank acquisition-related costs were $2.7 million.
    • Provision for credit losses totaled $24.0 million in the first quarter of 2025, as compared to a provision for credit losses of $17.0 million in the fourth quarter of 2024.
    • Net charge-offs totaled $12.6 million, or 11 basis points of average total loans on an annualized basis, in the first quarter of 2025 compared to $15.9 million, or 13 basis points of average total loans on an annualized basis, in the fourth quarter of 2024.

    Mr. Crane noted, “The Company exhibited disciplined and consistent loan growth, as loans increased by $653 million compared to the prior quarter, or 6% on an annualized basis. Loan pipelines are strong and we remain prudent in our review of credit opportunities, ensuring our loan growth adheres to our conservative credit standards. Strong deposit growth of $1.1 billion, or 8% on an annualized basis, in the first quarter of 2025 outpaced loan growth, which resulted in our loans-to-deposits ratio ending the quarter at 90.9%. Non-interest bearing deposits totaled $11.2 billion and comprised 21% of total deposits at the end of the first quarter of 2025. We continue to leverage our enviable market positioning to generate deposits, grow loans and expand our franchise value.”

    Commenting on credit quality, Mr. Crane stated, “Prudent credit management, involving in-depth reviews of the portfolio, has led to positive outcomes by proactively identifying and resolving problem credits in a timely fashion. We continue to be conservative, diversified, and maintain our consistently strong credit standards. We believe the Company’s reserves are appropriate and we remain committed to maintaining credit quality as evidenced by our improved net charge-offs, stable levels of non-performing loans and our core loan allowance for credit losses of 1.37%.”

    In summary, Mr. Crane concluded, “Overall, we are proud of our first quarter results and believe we are well-positioned to continue our strong momentum as we navigate the macroeconomic uncertainty in 2025. The first quarter results highlighted the quality of our core deposit franchise and multifaceted nature of our business model, which uniquely positions us to be successful. Anticipated solid loan growth in the second quarter, combined with a stable net interest margin should result in higher levels of net interest income in the second quarter of 2025. Increasing our long-term franchise value and net interest income, coupled with disciplined expense control and maintaining our conservative credit standards, remain our focus in 2025.”

    The graphs shown on pages 3-7 illustrate certain financial highlights of the first quarter of 2025 as well as historical financial performance. See “Supplemental Non-GAAP Financial Measures/Ratios” at Table 17 for additional information with respect to non-GAAP financial measures/ratios, including the reconciliations to the corresponding GAAP financial measures/ratios.

    Graphs available at the following link: http://ml.globenewswire.com/Resource/Download/cdbdc506-1b5a-4776-ae2e-e0b14106e712

    SUMMARY OF RESULTS:

    BALANCE SHEET

    Total assets increased $1.0 billion in the first quarter of 2025 as compared to the fourth quarter of 2024. Total loans increased by $653.4 million as compared to the fourth quarter of 2024. The increase in loans was primarily driven by growth in the commercial and premium finance life insurance loan portfolios.

    Total liabilities increased by $734.2 million in the first quarter of 2025 as compared to the fourth quarter of 2024, driven by a $1.1 billion increase in total deposits. Robust organic deposit growth in the first quarter of 2025 was driven by our diverse deposit product offerings. Non-interest bearing deposits as a percentage of total deposits were 21% at March 31, 2025, relatively stable compared to recent quarters. The Company’s loans-to-deposits ratio ended the quarter at 90.9%.

    For more information regarding changes in the Company’s balance sheet, see Consolidated Statements of Condition and Table 1 through Table 3 in this report.

    NET INTEREST INCOME

    For the first quarter of 2025, net interest income totaled $526.5 million, an increase of $1.3 million as compared to the fourth quarter of 2024, primarily due to improvement in net interest margin and growth in the balance sheet, partially offset by two fewer calendar days in the quarter.

    Net interest margin increased to 3.54% (3.56% on a fully taxable-equivalent basis, non-GAAP) during the first quarter of 2025, up five basis points compared to the fourth quarter of 2024. The yield on earning assets declined 11 basis points during the first quarter of 2025 primarily due to a 15 basis point decrease in loan yields. The net free funds contribution declined six basis points compared to the fourth quarter of 2024. These declines were more than offset by a 22 basis point reduction in funding cost, primarily due to a 23 basis point decline in the rate paid on interest-bearing deposits, compared to the fourth quarter of 2024.

    For more information regarding net interest income, see Table 4 through Table 7 in this report.

    ASSET QUALITY

    The allowance for credit losses totaled $448.4 million as of March 31, 2025, an increase from $437.1 million as of December 31, 2024. A provision for credit losses totaling $24.0 million was recorded for the first quarter of 2025 as compared to $17.0 million recorded in the fourth quarter of 2024. The higher provision for credit losses recognized in the first quarter of 2025 is primarily attributable to impacts related to the macroeconomic outlook. Future economic performance remains uncertain, thus downside risks to the baseline scenario, including widening credit spreads and lower valuations in financial markets, were considered to derive a qualitative addition to the provision for the first quarter of 2025. For more information regarding the allowance for credit losses and provision for credit losses, see Table 10 in this report.

    Management believes the allowance for credit losses is appropriate to account for expected credit losses. The Company is required to estimate expected credit losses over the life of the Company’s financial assets as of the reporting date. There can be no assurances, however, that future losses will not significantly exceed the amounts provided for, thereby affecting future results of operations. A summary of the allowance for credit losses calculated for the loan components in each portfolio as of March 31, 2025, December 31, 2024, and September 30, 2024 is shown on Table 11 of this report.

    Net charge-offs totaled $12.6 million in the first quarter of 2025, a decrease of $3.3 million as compared to $15.9 million of net charge-offs in the fourth quarter of 2024. Net charge-offs as a percentage of average total loans were 11 basis points in the first quarter of 2025 on an annualized basis, compared to 13 basis points on an annualized basis in the fourth quarter of 2024. For more information regarding net charge-offs, see Table 9 in this report.

    The Company’s delinquency rates remain low and manageable. For more information regarding past due loans, see Table 12 in this report.

    Non-performing assets and non-performing loans have remained relatively stable compared to prior quarters. Non-performing assets totaled $195.0 million and comprised 0.30% of total assets as of March 31, 2025, as compared to $193.9 million, or 0.30% of total assets, as of December 31, 2024. Non-performing loans totaled $172.4 million and comprised 0.35% of total loans at March 31, 2025, as compared to $170.8 million and 0.36% of total loans at December 31, 2024. For more information regarding non-performing assets, see Table 13 in this report.

    NON-INTEREST INCOME

    Non-interest income totaled $116.6 million in the first quarter of 2025, increasing $3.2 million, as compared to $113.5 million in the fourth quarter of 2024.

    Wealth management revenue decreased by $4.7 million in the first quarter of 2025, as compared to the fourth quarter of 2024. Revenue in the first quarter of 2025 was impacted by the transition of systems and support for brokerage and certain private client business to a new third party in the current quarter, as well as lower assets under management due to lower market valuations. The reduction in revenue was driven by anticipated slowdown in activity from the transition, market conditions, and certain offsets to expenses. Wealth management revenue is comprised of the trust and asset management revenue of Wintrust Private Trust Company and Great Lakes Advisors, the brokerage commissions, managed money fees and insurance product commissions at Wintrust Investments and fees from tax-deferred like-kind exchange services provided by the Chicago Deferred Exchange Company.

    Mortgage banking revenue totaling $20.5 million in the first quarter of 2025 was essentially unchanged compared to the fourth quarter of 2024. For more information regarding mortgage banking revenue, see Table 15 in this report.

    The Company recognized $19.4 million in service charges on deposit accounts in the first quarter of 2025, as compared to $18.9 million in the fourth quarter of 2024. The $0.5 million increase in the first quarter of 2025 was primarily due to increased commercial account fees.

    The Company recognized $3.2 million in net gains on investment securities in the first quarter of 2025 as compared to $2.8 million in net losses in the fourth quarter of 2024. The net gains in the first quarter of 2025 were primarily the result of unrealized gains on the Company’s equity investment securities with a readily determinable fair value.

    For more information regarding non-interest income, see Table 14 in this report.

    NON-INTEREST EXPENSE

    Non-interest expenses totaled $366.1 million in the first quarter of 2025, decreasing $2.4 million as compared to $368.5 million in the fourth quarter of 2024.

    Salaries and employee benefits expense decreased by $0.6 million in the first quarter of 2025 as compared to the fourth quarter of 2024. This was primarily driven by decreased commissions and incentives compensation expense related to lower mortgage originations and wealth management revenue in the quarter partially offset by higher salaries expense which can be attributed to annual merit increases taking effect in the first quarter of the year.

    Advertising and marketing expenses in the first quarter of 2025 totaled $12.3 million, which was a $0.8 million decrease as compared to the fourth quarter of 2024. The reduction in the first quarter is primarily due to timing of marketing campaigns, sponsorship arrangements and other investments.

    Professional fees expense totaled $9.0 million in the first quarter of 2025, resulting in a decrease of $2.3 million as compared to the fourth quarter of 2024. The decrease in the current quarter relates primarily to decreased fees on consulting services. Professional fees include legal, audit, and tax fees, external loan review costs, consulting arrangements and normal regulatory exam assessments.

    Travel and entertainment expense totaled $5.3 million in the first quarter of 2025 which decreased $2.9 million as compared to the fourth quarter of 2024. The decrease is primarily due to seasonal corporate events that occur during the fourth quarter.

    The Macatawa Bank acquisition related costs were $2.7 million in the first quarter of 2025, primarily driven by consulting expenses, employee retention and severance costs, and contracted resource costs.

    For more information regarding non-interest expense, see Table 16 in this report.

    INCOME TAXES

    The Company recorded income tax expense of $64.0 million in the first quarter compared to $67.7 million in the fourth quarter of 2024. The effective tax rates were 25.30% in the first quarter of 2025 compared to 26.76% in the fourth quarter of 2024. The effective tax rates were partially impacted by the tax effects related to share-based compensation, which fluctuate based on the Company’s stock price and timing of employee stock option exercises and vesting of other share-based awards. The Company recorded net excess tax benefits of $3.7 million in the first quarter of 2025, compared to excess tax benefits of $50,000 in the fourth quarter of 2024 related to share-based compensation.

    BUSINESS SUMMARY

    Community Banking

    Through community banking, the Company provides banking and financial services primarily to individuals, small to mid-sized businesses, local governmental units and institutional clients residing primarily in the local areas the Company services. In the first quarter of 2025, community banking increased its commercial, commercial real estate and residential real estate loan portfolios.

    Mortgage banking revenue was $20.5 million for both the first quarter of 2025, and the fourth quarter of 2024. See Table 15 for more detail. Service charges on deposit accounts totaled $19.4 million in the first quarter of 2025 as compared to $18.9 million in the fourth quarter of 2024. The Company’s gross commercial and commercial real estate loan pipelines remained solid as of March 31, 2025 indicating momentum for expected continued loan growth in the second quarter of 2025.

    Specialty Finance

    Through specialty finance, the Company offers financing of insurance premiums for businesses and individuals, equipment financing through structured loans and lease products to customers in a variety of industries, accounts receivable financing and value-added, out-sourced administrative services and other services. Originations within the insurance premium financing receivables portfolios were $4.8 billion during the first quarter of 2025. Average balances increased by $213.4 million, as compared to the fourth quarter of 2024. The Company’s leasing divisions’ portfolio balances increased in the first quarter of 2025, with capital leases, loans, and equipment on operating leases of $2.7 billion, $1.1 billion, and $280.5 million as of March 31, 2025 respectively, as compared to $2.5 billion, $1.1 billion, and $278.3 million as of December 31, 2024, respectively. Revenues from the Company’s out-sourced administrative services business were $1.4 million in the first quarter of 2025, which was relatively stable compared to the fourth quarter of 2024.

    Wealth Management

    Through wealth management, the Company offers a full range of wealth management services, including trust and investment services, tax-deferred like-kind exchange services, asset management, and securities brokerage services. See “Items Impacting Comparative Results,” regarding the sale of the Company’s Retirement Benefits Advisors (“RBA”) division during the first quarter of 2024. Wealth management revenue totaled $34.0 million in the first quarter of 2025, down slightly as compared to the fourth quarter of 2024. At March 31, 2025, the Company’s wealth management subsidiaries had approximately $51.1 billion of assets under administration, which included $8.4 billion of assets owned by the Company and its subsidiary banks.

    ITEMS IMPACTING COMPARATIVE FINANCIAL RESULTS

    Business Combination

    On August 1, 2024, the Company completed its previously announced acquisition of Macatawa, the parent company of Macatawa Bank. In conjunction with the completed acquisition, the Company issued approximately 4.7 million shares of common stock. Macatawa operates 26 full-service branches located throughout communities in Kent, Ottawa and northern Allegan counties in the state of Michigan. Macatawa offers a full range of banking, retail and commercial lending, wealth management and ecommerce services to individuals, businesses and governmental entities. As of August 1, 2024, Macatawa had fair values of approximately $2.9 billion in assets, $2.3 billion in deposits and $1.3 billion in loans. As of March 31, 2025, the Company recorded goodwill of approximately $142.1 million on the purchase.

    Division Sale

    In the first quarter of 2024, the Company sold its RBA division and recorded a net gain of approximately $19.3 million ($20.0 million in other non-interest income from the sale, offset by $0.7 million in commissions/incentive compensation expense).

    WINTRUST FINANCIAL CORPORATION
    Key Operating Measures

    Wintrust’s key operating measures and growth rates for the first quarter of 2025, as compared to the fourth quarter of 2024 (sequential quarter) and first quarter of 2024 (linked quarter), are shown in the table below:

                  % or (1)basis point (bp) change  from
    4th Quarter
    2024
      % or basis point (bp) change from
    1st Quarter
    2024
        Three Months Ended  
    (Dollars in thousands, except per share data)   Mar 31, 2025   Dec 31, 2024   Mar 31, 2024  
    Net income   $ 189,039     $ 185,362     $ 187,294   2   %   1   %
    Pre-tax income, excluding provision for credit losses (non-GAAP) (2)     277,018       270,060       271,629   3       2    
    Net income per common share – Diluted     2.69       2.63       2.89   2       (7 )  
    Cash dividends declared per common share     0.50       0.45       0.45   11       11    
    Net revenue (3)     643,108       638,599       604,774   1       6    
    Net interest income     526,474       525,148       464,194   0       13    
    Net interest margin     3.54 %     3.49 %     3.57 % 5   bps   (3 ) bps
    Net interest margin – fully taxable-equivalent (non-GAAP) (2)     3.56       3.51       3.59   5       (3 )  
    Net overhead ratio (4)     1.58       1.60       1.39   (2 )     19    
    Return on average assets     1.20       1.16       1.35   4       (15 )  
    Return on average common equity     12.21       11.82       14.42   39       (221 )  
    Return on average tangible common equity (non-GAAP) (2)     14.72       14.29       16.75   43       (203 )  
    At end of period                      
    Total assets   $ 65,870,066     $ 64,879,668     $ 57,576,933   6   %   14   %
    Total loans (5)     48,708,390       48,055,037       43,230,706   6       13    
    Total deposits     53,570,038       52,512,349       46,448,858   8       15    
    Total shareholders’ equity     6,600,537       6,344,297       5,436,400   16       21    

    (1)   Period-end balance sheet percentage changes are annualized.
    (2)   See Table 17: Supplemental Non-GAAP Financial Measures/Ratios for additional information on this performance measure/ratio.
    (3)   Net revenue is net interest income plus non-interest income.
    (4)   The net overhead ratio is calculated by netting total non-interest expense and total non-interest income, annualizing this amount, and dividing by that period’s average total assets. A lower ratio indicates a higher degree of efficiency.
    (5)   Excludes mortgage loans held-for-sale.

    Certain returns, yields, performance ratios, or quarterly growth rates are “annualized” in this presentation to represent an annual time period. This is done for analytical purposes to better discern, for decision-making purposes, underlying performance trends when compared to full-year or year-over-year amounts. For example, a 5% growth rate for a quarter would represent an annualized 20% growth rate. Additional supplemental financial information showing quarterly trends can be found on the Company’s website at www.wintrust.com by choosing “Financial Reports” under the “Investor Relations” heading, and then choosing “Financial Highlights.”


    WINTRUST FINANCIAL CORPORATION

    Selected Financial Highlights

        Three Months Ended
    (Dollars in thousands, except per share data)   Mar 31, 2025   Dec 31, 2024   Sep 30, 2024   Jun 30, 2024   Mar 31, 2024
    Selected Financial Condition Data (at end of period):
    Total assets   $ 65,870,066     $ 64,879,668     $ 63,788,424     $ 59,781,516     $ 57,576,933  
    Total loans (1)     48,708,390       48,055,037       47,067,447       44,675,531       43,230,706  
    Total deposits     53,570,038       52,512,349       51,404,966       48,049,026       46,448,858  
    Total shareholders’ equity     6,600,537       6,344,297       6,399,714       5,536,628       5,436,400  
    Selected Statements of Income Data:                    
    Net interest income   $ 526,474     $ 525,148     $ 502,583     $ 470,610     $ 464,194  
    Net revenue (2)     643,108       638,599       615,730       591,757       604,774  
    Net income     189,039       185,362       170,001       152,388       187,294  
    Pre-tax income, excluding provision for credit losses (non-GAAP) (3)     277,018       270,060       255,043       251,404       271,629  
    Net income per common share – Basic     2.73       2.68       2.51       2.35       2.93  
    Net income per common share – Diluted     2.69       2.63       2.47       2.32       2.89  
    Cash dividends declared per common share     0.50       0.45       0.45       0.45       0.45  
    Selected Financial Ratios and Other Data:                    
    Performance Ratios:                    
    Net interest margin     3.54 %     3.49 %     3.49 %     3.50 %     3.57 %
    Net interest margin – fully taxable-equivalent (non-GAAP) (3)     3.56       3.51       3.51       3.52       3.59  
    Non-interest income to average assets     0.74       0.71       0.74       0.85       1.02  
    Non-interest expense to average assets     2.32       2.31       2.36       2.38       2.41  
    Net overhead ratio (4)     1.58       1.60       1.62       1.53       1.39  
    Return on average assets     1.20       1.16       1.11       1.07       1.35  
    Return on average common equity     12.21       11.82       11.63       11.61       14.42  
    Return on average tangible common equity (non-GAAP) (3)     14.72       14.29       13.92       13.49       16.75  
    Average total assets   $ 64,107,042     $ 63,594,105     $ 60,915,283     $ 57,493,184     $ 55,602,695  
    Average total shareholders’ equity     6,460,941       6,418,403       5,990,429       5,450,173       5,440,457  
    Average loans to average deposits ratio     92.3 %     91.9 %     93.8 %     95.1 %     94.5 %
    Period-end loans to deposits ratio     90.9       91.5       91.6       93.0       93.1  
    Common Share Data at end of period:                    
    Market price per common share   $ 112.46     $ 124.71     $ 108.53     $ 98.56     $ 104.39  
    Book value per common share     92.47       89.21       90.06       82.97       81.38  
    Tangible book value per common share (non-GAAP) (3)     78.83       75.39       76.15       72.01       70.40  
    Common shares outstanding     66,919,325       66,495,227       66,481,543       61,760,139       61,736,715  
    Other Data at end of period:                    
    Common equity to assets ratio     9.4 %     9.1 %     9.4 %     8.6 %     8.7 %
    Tangible common equity ratio (non-GAAP) (3)     8.1       7.8       8.1       7.5       7.6  
    Tier 1 leverage ratio (5)     9.6       9.4       9.6       9.3       9.4  
    Risk-based capital ratios:                    
    Tier 1 capital ratio (5)     10.8       10.7       10.6       10.3       10.3  
    Common equity tier 1 capital ratio (5)     10.1       9.9       9.8       9.5       9.5  
    Total capital ratio (5)     12.5       12.3       12.2       12.1       12.2  
    Allowance for credit losses (6)   $ 448,387     $ 437,060     $ 436,193     $ 437,560     $ 427,504  
    Allowance for loan and unfunded lending-related commitment losses to total loans     0.92 %     0.91 %     0.93 %     0.98 %     0.99 %
    Number of:                    
    Bank subsidiaries     16       16       16       15       15  
    Banking offices     208       205       203       177       176  

    (1)   Excludes mortgage loans held-for-sale.
    (2)   Net revenue is net interest income plus non-interest income.
    (3)   See Table 17: Supplemental Non-GAAP Financial Measures/Ratios for additional information on this performance measure/ratio.
    (4)   The net overhead ratio is calculated by netting total non-interest expense and total non-interest income, annualizing this amount, and dividing by that period’s average total assets. A lower ratio indicates a higher degree of efficiency.
    (5)   Capital ratios for current quarter-end are estimated.
    (6)   The allowance for credit losses includes the allowance for loan losses, the allowance for unfunded lending-related commitments and the allowance for held-to-maturity securities losses.


    WINTRUST FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

    CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CONDITION

        (Unaudited)       (Unaudited)   (Unaudited)   (Unaudited)
        Mar 31,   Dec 31,   Sep 30,   Jun 30,   Mar 31,
    (In thousands)     2025       2024       2024       2024       2024  
    Assets                    
    Cash and due from banks   $ 616,216     $ 452,017     $ 725,465     $ 415,462     $ 379,825  
    Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements     63       6,519       5,663       62       61  
    Interest-bearing deposits with banks     4,238,237       4,409,753       3,648,117       2,824,314       2,131,077  
    Available-for-sale securities, at fair value     4,220,305       4,141,482       3,912,232       4,329,957       4,387,598  
    Held-to-maturity securities, at amortized cost     3,564,490       3,613,263       3,677,420       3,755,924       3,810,015  
    Trading account securities     —       4,072       3,472       4,134       2,184  
    Equity securities with readily determinable fair value     270,442       215,412       125,310       112,173       119,777  
    Federal Home Loan Bank and Federal Reserve Bank stock     281,893       281,407       266,908       256,495       224,657  
    Brokerage customer receivables     —       18,102       16,662       13,682       13,382  
    Mortgage loans held-for-sale, at fair value     316,804       331,261       461,067       411,851       339,884  
    Loans, net of unearned income     48,708,390       48,055,037       47,067,447       44,675,531       43,230,706  
    Allowance for loan losses     (378,207 )     (364,017 )     (360,279 )     (363,719 )     (348,612 )
    Net loans     48,330,183       47,691,020       46,707,168       44,311,812       42,882,094  
    Premises, software and equipment, net     776,679       779,130       772,002       722,295       744,769  
    Lease investments, net     280,472       278,264       270,171       275,459       283,557  
    Accrued interest receivable and other assets     1,598,255       1,739,334       1,721,090       1,671,334       1,580,142  
    Trade date securities receivable     463,023       —       551,031       —       —  
    Goodwill     796,932       796,942       800,780       655,955       656,181  
    Other acquisition-related intangible assets     116,072       121,690       123,866       20,607       21,730  
    Total assets   $ 65,870,066     $ 64,879,668     $ 63,788,424     $ 59,781,516     $ 57,576,933  
    Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity                    
    Deposits:                    
    Non-interest-bearing   $ 11,201,859     $ 11,410,018     $ 10,739,132     $ 10,031,440     $ 9,908,183  
    Interest-bearing     42,368,179       41,102,331       40,665,834       38,017,586       36,540,675  
    Total deposits     53,570,038       52,512,349       51,404,966       48,049,026       46,448,858  
    Federal Home Loan Bank advances     3,151,309       3,151,309       3,171,309       3,176,309       2,676,751  
    Other borrowings     529,269       534,803       647,043       606,579       575,408  
    Subordinated notes     298,360       298,283       298,188       298,113       437,965  
    Junior subordinated debentures     253,566       253,566       253,566       253,566       253,566  
    Accrued interest payable and other liabilities     1,466,987       1,785,061       1,613,638       1,861,295       1,747,985  
    Total liabilities     59,269,529       58,535,371       57,388,710       54,244,888       52,140,533  
    Shareholders’ Equity:                    
    Preferred stock     412,500       412,500       412,500       412,500       412,500  
    Common stock     67,007       66,560       66,546       61,825       61,798  
    Surplus     2,494,347       2,482,561       2,470,228       1,964,645       1,954,532  
    Treasury stock     (9,156 )     (6,153 )     (6,098 )     (5,760 )     (5,757 )
    Retained earnings     4,045,854       3,897,164       3,748,715       3,615,616       3,498,475  
    Accumulated other comprehensive loss     (410,015 )     (508,335 )     (292,177 )     (512,198 )     (485,148 )
    Total shareholders’ equity     6,600,537       6,344,297       6,399,714       5,536,628       5,436,400  
    Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity   $ 65,870,066     $ 64,879,668     $ 63,788,424     $ 59,781,516     $ 57,576,933  

    WINTRUST FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
    CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (UNAUDITED)

      Three Months Ended
    (Dollars in thousands, except per share data) Mar 31,
    2025
      Dec 31,
    2024
      Sep 30,
    2024
      Jun 30,
    2024
      Mar 31,
    2024
    Interest income                  
    Interest and fees on loans $ 768,362     $ 789,038     $ 794,163     $ 749,812     $ 710,341  
    Mortgage loans held-for-sale   4,246       5,623       6,233       5,434       4,146  
    Interest-bearing deposits with banks   36,766       46,256       32,608       19,731       16,658  
    Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements   179       53       277       17       19  
    Investment securities   72,016       67,066       69,592       69,779       69,678  
    Trading account securities   11       6       11       13       18  
    Federal Home Loan Bank and Federal Reserve Bank stock   5,307       5,157       5,451       4,974       4,478  
    Brokerage customer receivables   78       302       269       219       175  
    Total interest income   886,965       913,501       908,604       849,979       805,513  
    Interest expense                  
    Interest on deposits   320,233       346,388       362,019       335,703       299,532  
    Interest on Federal Home Loan Bank advances   25,441       26,050       26,254       24,797       22,048  
    Interest on other borrowings   6,792       7,519       9,013       8,700       9,248  
    Interest on subordinated notes   3,714       3,733       3,712       5,185       5,487  
    Interest on junior subordinated debentures   4,311       4,663       5,023       4,984       5,004  
    Total interest expense   360,491       388,353       406,021       379,369       341,319  
    Net interest income   526,474       525,148       502,583       470,610       464,194  
    Provision for credit losses   23,963       16,979       22,334       40,061       21,673  
    Net interest income after provision for credit losses   502,511       508,169       480,249       430,549       442,521  
    Non-interest income                  
    Wealth management   34,042       38,775       37,224       35,413       34,815  
    Mortgage banking   20,529       20,452       15,974       29,124       27,663  
    Service charges on deposit accounts   19,362       18,864       16,430       15,546       14,811  
    Gains (losses) on investment securities, net   3,196       (2,835 )     3,189       (4,282 )     1,326  
    Fees from covered call options   3,446       2,305       988       2,056       4,847  
    Trading (losses) gains, net   (64 )     (113 )     (130 )     70       677  
    Operating lease income, net   15,287       15,327       15,335       13,938       14,110  
    Other   20,836       20,676       24,137       29,282       42,331  
    Total non-interest income   116,634       113,451       113,147       121,147       140,580  
    Non-interest expense                  
    Salaries and employee benefits   211,526       212,133       211,261       198,541       195,173  
    Software and equipment   34,717       34,258       31,574       29,231       27,731  
    Operating lease equipment   10,471       10,263       10,518       10,834       10,683  
    Occupancy, net   20,778       20,597       19,945       19,585       19,086  
    Data processing   11,274       10,957       9,984       9,503       9,292  
    Advertising and marketing   12,272       13,097       18,239       17,436       13,040  
    Professional fees   9,044       11,334       9,783       9,967       9,553  
    Amortization of other acquisition-related intangible assets   5,618       5,773       4,042       1,122       1,158  
    FDIC insurance   10,926       10,640       10,512       10,429       14,537  
    OREO expenses, net   643       397       (938 )     (259 )     392  
    Other   38,821       39,090       35,767       33,964       32,500  
    Total non-interest expense   366,090       368,539       360,687       340,353       333,145  
    Income before taxes   253,055       253,081       232,709       211,343       249,956  
    Income tax expense   64,016       67,719       62,708       58,955       62,662  
    Net income $ 189,039     $ 185,362     $ 170,001     $ 152,388     $ 187,294  
    Preferred stock dividends   6,991       6,991       6,991       6,991       6,991  
    Net income applicable to common shares $ 182,048     $ 178,371     $ 163,010     $ 145,397     $ 180,303  
    Net income per common share – Basic $ 2.73     $ 2.68     $ 2.51     $ 2.35     $ 2.93  
    Net income per common share – Diluted $ 2.69     $ 2.63     $ 2.47     $ 2.32     $ 2.89  
    Cash dividends declared per common share $ 0.50     $ 0.45     $ 0.45     $ 0.45     $ 0.45  
    Weighted average common shares outstanding   66,726       66,491       64,888       61,839       61,481  
    Dilutive potential common shares   923       1,233       1,053       926       928  
    Average common shares and dilutive common shares   67,649       67,724       65,941       62,765       62,409  

    TABLE 1: LOAN PORTFOLIO MIX AND GROWTH RATES

                        % Growth From
    (Dollars in thousands) Mar 31,
    2025
      Dec 31,
    2024
      Sep 30,
    2024
      Jun 30,
    2024
      Mar 31,
    2024
    Dec 31,
    2024 (1)
      Mar 31,
    2024
    Balance:                        
    Mortgage loans held-for-sale, excluding early buy-out exercised loans guaranteed by U.S. government agencies $ 181,580     $ 189,774     $ 314,693     $ 281,103     $ 193,064   (18 )%   (6 )%
    Mortgage loans held-for-sale, early buy-out exercised loans guaranteed by U.S. government agencies   135,224       141,487       146,374       130,748       146,820   (18 )   (8 )
    Total mortgage loans held-for-sale $ 316,804     $ 331,261     $ 461,067     $ 411,851     $ 339,884   (18 )%   (7 )%
                             
    Core loans:                        
    Commercial                        
    Commercial and industrial $ 6,871,206     $ 6,867,422     $ 6,774,683     $ 6,236,290     $ 6,117,004   0 %   12 %
    Asset-based lending   1,701,962       1,611,001       1,709,685       1,465,867       1,355,255   23     26  
    Municipal   798,646       826,653       827,125       747,357       721,526   (14 )   11  
    Leases   2,680,943       2,537,325       2,443,721       2,439,128       2,344,295   23     14  
    Commercial real estate                        
    Residential construction   55,849       48,617       73,088       55,019       57,558   60     (3 )
    Commercial construction   2,086,797       2,065,775       1,984,240       1,866,701       1,748,607   4     19  
    Land   306,235       319,689       346,362       338,831       344,149   (17 )   (11 )
    Office   1,641,555       1,656,109       1,675,286       1,585,312       1,566,748   (4 )   5  
    Industrial   2,677,555       2,628,576       2,527,932       2,307,455       2,190,200   8     22  
    Retail   1,402,837       1,374,655       1,404,586       1,365,753       1,366,415   8     3  
    Multi-family   3,091,314       3,125,505       3,193,339       2,988,940       2,922,432   (4 )   6  
    Mixed use and other   1,652,759       1,685,018       1,588,584       1,439,186       1,437,328   (8 )   15  
    Home equity   455,683       445,028       427,043       356,313       340,349   10     34  
    Residential real estate                        
    Residential real estate loans for investment   3,561,417       3,456,009       3,252,649       2,933,157       2,746,916   12     30  
    Residential mortgage loans, early buy-out eligible loans guaranteed by U.S. government agencies   86,952       114,985       92,355       88,503       90,911   (99 )   (4 )
    Residential mortgage loans, early buy-out exercised loans guaranteed by U.S. government agencies   36,790       41,771       43,034       45,675       52,439   (48 )   (30 )
    Total core loans $ 29,108,500     $ 28,804,138     $ 28,363,712     $ 26,259,487     $ 25,402,132   4 %   15 %
                             
    Niche loans:                        
    Commercial                        
    Franchise $ 1,262,555     $ 1,268,521     $ 1,191,686     $ 1,150,460     $ 1,122,302   (2 )%   12 %
    Mortgage warehouse lines of credit   1,019,543       893,854       750,462       593,519       403,245   57     NM
    Community Advantage – homeowners association   525,492       525,446       501,645       491,722       475,832   0     10  
    Insurance agency lending   1,070,979       1,044,329       1,048,686       1,030,119       964,022   10     11  
    Premium Finance receivables                        
    U.S. property & casualty insurance   6,486,663       6,447,625       6,253,271       6,142,654       6,113,993   2     6  
    Canada property & casualty insurance   753,199       824,417       878,410       958,099       826,026   (35 )   (9 )
    Life insurance   8,365,140       8,147,145       7,996,899       7,962,115       7,872,033   11     6  
    Consumer and other   116,319       99,562       82,676       87,356       51,121   68     NM
    Total niche loans $ 19,599,890     $ 19,250,899     $ 18,703,735     $ 18,416,044     $ 17,828,574   7 %   10 %
                             
    Total loans, net of unearned income $ 48,708,390     $ 48,055,037     $ 47,067,447     $ 44,675,531     $ 43,230,706   6 %   13 %

    (1)   Annualized.


    TABLE 2: DEPOSIT PORTFOLIO MIX AND GROWTH RATES

                        % Growth From
    (Dollars in thousands) Mar 31,
    2025
      Dec 31,
    2024
      Sep 30,
    2024
      Jun 30,
    2024
      Mar 31,
    2024
    Dec 31,
    2024 (1)
      Mar 31, 2024
    Balance:                        
    Non-interest-bearing $ 11,201,859     $ 11,410,018     $ 10,739,132     $ 10,031,440     $ 9,908,183   (7 )%   13 %
    NOW and interest-bearing demand deposits   6,340,168       5,865,546       5,466,932       5,053,909       5,720,947   33     11  
    Wealth management deposits (2)   1,408,790       1,469,064       1,303,354       1,490,711       1,347,817   (17 )   5  
    Money market   18,074,733       17,975,191       17,713,726       16,320,017       15,617,717   2     16  
    Savings   6,576,251       6,372,499       6,183,249       5,882,179       5,959,774   13     10  
    Time certificates of deposit   9,968,237       9,420,031       9,998,573       9,270,770       7,894,420   24     26  
    Total deposits $ 53,570,038     $ 52,512,349     $ 51,404,966     $ 48,049,026     $ 46,448,858   8 %   15 %
    Mix:                        
    Non-interest-bearing   21 %     22 %     21 %     21 %     21 %      
    NOW and interest-bearing demand deposits   12       11       11       11       12        
    Wealth management deposits (2)   3       3       3       3       3        
    Money market   34       34       34       34       34        
    Savings   12       12       12       12       13        
    Time certificates of deposit   18       18       19       19       17        
    Total deposits   100 %     100 %     100 %     100 %     100 %      

    (1)   Annualized.
    (2)   Represents deposit balances of the Company’s subsidiary banks from brokerage customers of Wintrust Investments, Chicago Deferred Exchange Company, LLC (“CDEC”), and trust and asset management customers of the Company.


    TABLE 3
    : TIME CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT MATURITY/RE-PRICING ANALYSIS
    As of March 31, 2025

    (Dollars in thousands)   Total Time
    Certificates of
    Deposit
      Weighted-Average
    Rate of Maturing
    Time Certificates
    of Deposit
    1-3 months   $ 3,845,120     4.34 %
    4-6 months     2,345,184     3.81  
    7-9 months     2,694,739     3.72  
    10-12 months     711,206     3.62  
    13-18 months     210,063     3.03  
    19-24 months     87,336     2.72  
    24+ months     74,589     2.47  
    Total   $ 9,968,237     3.94 %

    TABLE 4: QUARTERLY AVERAGE BALANCES

        Average Balance for three months ended,
        Mar 31,   Dec 31,   Sep 30,   Jun 30,   Mar 31,
    (In thousands)     2025       2024       2024       2024       2024  
    Interest-bearing deposits with banks, securities purchased under resale agreements and cash equivalents (1)   $ 3,520,048     $ 3,934,016     $ 2,413,728     $ 1,485,481     $ 1,254,332  
    Investment securities (2)     8,409,735       8,090,271       8,276,576       8,203,764       8,349,796  
    FHLB and FRB stock     281,702       271,825       263,707       253,614       230,648  
    Liquidity management assets (3)   $ 12,211,485     $ 12,296,112     $ 10,954,011     $ 9,942,859     $ 9,834,776  
    Other earning assets (3)(4)     13,140       20,528       17,542       15,257       15,081  
    Mortgage loans held-for-sale     286,710       378,707       376,251       347,236       290,275  
    Loans, net of unearned income (3)(5)     47,833,380       47,153,014       45,920,586       43,819,354       42,129,893  
    Total earning assets (3)   $ 60,344,715     $ 59,848,361     $ 57,268,390     $ 54,124,706     $ 52,270,025  
    Allowance for loan and investment security losses     (375,371 )     (367,238 )     (383,736 )     (360,504 )     (361,734 )
    Cash and due from banks     476,423       470,033       467,333       434,916       450,267  
    Other assets     3,661,275       3,642,949       3,563,296       3,294,066       3,244,137  
    Total assets   $ 64,107,042     $ 63,594,105     $ 60,915,283     $ 57,493,184     $ 55,602,695  
                         
    NOW and interest-bearing demand deposits   $ 6,046,189     $ 5,601,672     $ 5,174,673     $ 4,985,306     $ 5,680,265  
    Wealth management deposits     1,574,480       1,430,163       1,362,747       1,531,865       1,510,203  
    Money market accounts     17,581,141       17,579,395       16,436,111       15,272,126       14,474,492  
    Savings accounts     6,479,444       6,288,727       6,096,746       5,878,844       5,792,118  
    Time deposits     9,406,126       9,702,948       9,598,109       8,546,172       7,148,456  
    Interest-bearing deposits   $ 41,087,380     $ 40,602,905     $ 38,668,386     $ 36,214,313     $ 34,605,534  
    Federal Home Loan Bank advances     3,151,309       3,160,658       3,178,973       3,096,920       2,728,849  
    Other borrowings     582,139       577,786       622,792       587,262       627,711  
    Subordinated notes     298,306       298,225       298,135       410,331       437,893  
    Junior subordinated debentures     253,566       253,566       253,566       253,566       253,566  
    Total interest-bearing liabilities   $ 45,372,700     $ 44,893,140     $ 43,021,852     $ 40,562,392     $ 38,653,553  
    Non-interest-bearing deposits     10,732,156       10,718,738       10,271,613       9,879,134       9,972,646  
    Other liabilities     1,541,245       1,563,824       1,631,389       1,601,485       1,536,039  
    Equity     6,460,941       6,418,403       5,990,429       5,450,173       5,440,457  
    Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity   $ 64,107,042     $ 63,594,105     $ 60,915,283     $ 57,493,184     $ 55,602,695  
                         
    Net free funds/contribution (6)   $ 14,972,015     $ 14,955,221     $ 14,246,538     $ 13,562,314     $ 13,616,472  

    (1)   Includes interest-bearing deposits from banks and securities purchased under resale agreements with original maturities of greater than three months. Cash equivalents include federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements with original maturities of three months or less.
    (2)   Investment securities includes investment securities classified as available-for-sale and held-to-maturity, and equity securities with readily determinable fair values. Equity securities without readily determinable fair values are included within other assets.
    (3)   See Table 17: Supplemental Non-GAAP Financial Measures/Ratios for additional information on this performance measure/ratio.
    (4)   Other earning assets include brokerage customer receivables and trading account securities.
    (5)   Loans, net of unearned income, include non-accrual loans.
    (6)   Net free funds are the difference between total average earning assets and total average interest-bearing liabilities. The estimated contribution to net interest margin from net free funds is calculated using the rate paid for total interest-bearing liabilities.


    TABLE 5: QUARTERLY NET INTEREST INCOME

        Net Interest Income for three months ended,
        Mar 31,   Dec 31,   Sep 30,   Jun 30,   Mar 31,
    (In thousands)     2025       2024       2024       2024       2024  
    Interest income:                    
    Interest-bearing deposits with banks, securities purchased under resale agreements and cash equivalents   $ 36,945     $ 46,308     $ 32,885     $ 19,748     $ 16,677  
    Investment securities     72,706       67,783       70,260       70,346       70,228  
    FHLB and FRB stock     5,307       5,157       5,451       4,974       4,478  
    Liquidity management assets (1)   $ 114,958     $ 119,248     $ 108,596     $ 95,068     $ 91,383  
    Other earning assets (1)     92       310       282       235       198  
    Mortgage loans held-for-sale     4,246       5,623       6,233       5,434       4,146  
    Loans, net of unearned income (1)     770,568       791,390       796,637       752,117       712,587  
    Total interest income   $ 889,864     $ 916,571     $ 911,748     $ 852,854     $ 808,314  
                         
    Interest expense:                    
    NOW and interest-bearing demand deposits   $ 33,600     $ 31,695     $ 30,971     $ 32,719     $ 34,896  
    Wealth management deposits     8,606       9,412       10,158       10,294       10,461  
    Money market accounts     146,374       159,945       167,382       155,100       137,984  
    Savings accounts     35,923       38,402       42,892       41,063       39,071  
    Time deposits     95,730       106,934       110,616       96,527       77,120  
    Interest-bearing deposits   $ 320,233     $ 346,388     $ 362,019     $ 335,703     $ 299,532  
    Federal Home Loan Bank advances     25,441       26,050       26,254       24,797       22,048  
    Other borrowings     6,792       7,519       9,013       8,700       9,248  
    Subordinated notes     3,714       3,733       3,712       5,185       5,487  
    Junior subordinated debentures     4,311       4,663       5,023       4,984       5,004  
    Total interest expense   $ 360,491     $ 388,353     $ 406,021     $ 379,369     $ 341,319  
                         
    Less: Fully taxable-equivalent adjustment     (2,899 )     (3,070 )     (3,144 )     (2,875 )     (2,801 )
    Net interest income (GAAP) (2)     526,474       525,148       502,583       470,610       464,194  
    Fully taxable-equivalent adjustment     2,899       3,070       3,144       2,875       2,801  
    Net interest income, fully taxable-equivalent (non-GAAP) (2)   $ 529,373     $ 528,218     $ 505,727     $ 473,485     $ 466,995  

    (1)   Interest income on tax-advantaged loans, trading securities and investment securities reflects a taxable-equivalent adjustment based on the marginal federal corporate tax rate in effect as of the applicable period.
    (2)   See Table 17: Supplemental Non-GAAP Financial Measures/Ratios for additional information on this performance measure/ratio.


    TABLE 6: QUARTERLY NET INTEREST MARGIN

        Net Interest Margin for three months ended,
        Mar 31,
    2025
      Dec 31,
    2024
      Sep 30,
    2024
      Jun 30,
    2024
      Mar 31,
    2024
    Yield earned on:                    
    Interest-bearing deposits with banks, securities purchased under resale agreements and cash equivalents   4.26 %   4.68 %   5.42 %   5.35 %   5.35 %
    Investment securities   3.51     3.33     3.38     3.45     3.38  
    FHLB and FRB stock   7.64     7.55     8.22     7.89     7.81  
    Liquidity management assets   3.82 %   3.86 %   3.94 %   3.85 %   3.74 %
    Other earning assets   2.84     6.01     6.38     6.23     5.25  
    Mortgage loans held-for-sale   6.01     5.91     6.59     6.29     5.74  
    Loans, net of unearned income   6.53     6.68     6.90     6.90     6.80  
    Total earning assets   5.98 %   6.09 %   6.33 %   6.34 %   6.22 %
                         
    Rate paid on:                    
    NOW and interest-bearing demand deposits   2.25 %   2.25 %   2.38 %   2.64 %   2.47 %
    Wealth management deposits   2.22     2.62     2.97     2.70     2.79  
    Money market accounts   3.38     3.62     4.05     4.08     3.83  
    Savings accounts   2.25     2.43     2.80     2.81     2.71  
    Time deposits   4.13     4.38     4.58     4.54     4.34  
    Interest-bearing deposits   3.16 %   3.39 %   3.72 %   3.73 %   3.48 %
    Federal Home Loan Bank advances   3.27     3.28     3.29     3.22     3.25  
    Other borrowings   4.73     5.18     5.76     5.96     5.92  
    Subordinated notes   5.05     4.98     4.95     5.08     5.04  
    Junior subordinated debentures   6.90     7.32     7.88     7.91     7.94  
    Total interest-bearing liabilities   3.22 %   3.44 %   3.75 %   3.76 %   3.55 %
                         
    Interest rate spread (1)(2)   2.76 %   2.65 %   2.58 %   2.58 %   2.67 %
    Less: Fully taxable-equivalent adjustment   (0.02 )   (0.02 )   (0.02 )   (0.02 )   (0.02 )
    Net free funds/contribution (3)   0.80     0.86     0.93     0.94     0.92  
    Net interest margin (GAAP) (2)   3.54 %   3.49 %   3.49 %   3.50 %   3.57 %
    Fully taxable-equivalent adjustment   0.02     0.02     0.02     0.02     0.02  
    Net interest margin, fully taxable-equivalent (non-GAAP) (2)   3.56 %   3.51 %   3.51 %   3.52 %   3.59 %

    (1)   Interest rate spread is the difference between the yield earned on earning assets and the rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities.
    (2)   See Table 17: Supplemental Non-GAAP Financial Measures/Ratios for additional information on this performance measure/ratio.
    (3)   Net free funds are the difference between total average earning assets and total average interest-bearing liabilities. The estimated contribution to net interest margin from net free funds is calculated using the rate paid for total interest-bearing liabilities.


    TABLE 7
    : INTEREST RATE SENSITIVITY

    As an ongoing part of its financial strategy, the Company attempts to manage the impact of fluctuations in market interest rates on net interest income. Management measures its exposure to changes in interest rates by modeling many different interest rate scenarios.

    The following interest rate scenarios display the percentage change in net interest income over a one-year time horizon assuming increases and decreases of 100 and 200 basis points as compared to projected net interest income in a scenario with no assumed rate changes. The Static Shock Scenario results incorporate actual cash flows and repricing characteristics for balance sheet instruments following an instantaneous, parallel change in market rates based upon a static (i.e. no growth or constant) balance sheet. Conversely, the Ramp Scenario results incorporate management’s projections of future volume and pricing of each of the product lines following a gradual, parallel change in market rates over twelve months. Actual results may differ from these simulated results due to timing, magnitude, and frequency of interest rate changes as well as changes in market conditions and management strategies. The interest rate sensitivity for both the Static Shock and Ramp Scenario is as follows:

    Static Shock Scenario   +200 Basis
    Points
      +100 Basis
    Points
      -100 Basis
    Points
      -200 Basis
    Points
    Mar 31, 2025   (1.8 )%   (0.6 )%   (0.2 )%   (1.2 )%
    Dec 31, 2024   (1.6 )   (0.6 )   (0.3 )   (1.5 )
    Sep 30, 2024   1.2     1.1     0.4     (0.9 )
    Jun 30, 2024   1.5     1.0     0.6     (0.0 )
    Mar 31, 2024   1.9     1.4     1.5     1.6  
    Ramp Scenario +200 Basis
    Points
      +100 Basis
    Points
      -100 Basis
    Points
        -200 Basis
    Points
    Mar 31, 2025 0.2 %   0.2 %   (0.1 )%   (0.5 )%
    Dec 31, 2024 (0.2 )   (0.0 )   0.0     (0.3 )
    Sep 30, 2024 1.6     1.2     0.7     0.5  
    Jun 30, 2024 1.2     1.0     0.9     1.0  
    Mar 31, 2024 0.8     0.6     1.3     2.0  

    As shown above, the magnitude of potential changes in net interest income in various interest rate scenarios has continued to remain relatively neutral. As the current interest rate cycle progressed, management took action to reposition its sensitivity to interest rates. To this end, management has executed various derivative instruments including collars and receive fixed swaps to hedge variable rate loan exposures and originated a higher percentage of its loan originations in longer-term fixed-rate loans. The Company will continue to monitor current and projected interest rates and may execute additional derivatives to mitigate potential fluctuations in the net interest margin in future periods.


    TABLE 8
    : MATURITIES AND SENSITIVITIES TO CHANGES IN INTEREST RATES

      Loans repricing or contractual maturity period
    As of March 31, 2025
    (In thousands)
    One year or
    less
      From one to
    five years
      From five to fifteen years   After fifteen years   Total
    Commercial                  
    Fixed rate $ 405,736     $ 3,600,171     $ 2,122,563     $ 20,444     $ 6,148,914  
    Variable rate   9,781,709       703       —       —       9,782,412  
    Total commercial $ 10,187,445     $ 3,600,874     $ 2,122,563     $ 20,444     $ 15,931,326  
    Commercial real estate                  
    Fixed rate $ 658,413     $ 2,762,221     $ 365,181     $ 63,593     $ 3,849,408  
    Variable rate   9,054,583       10,843       67       —       9,065,493  
    Total commercial real estate $ 9,712,996     $ 2,773,064     $ 365,248     $ 63,593     $ 12,914,901  
    Home equity                  
    Fixed rate $ 8,881     $ 838     $ —     $ 17     $ 9,736  
    Variable rate   445,947       —       —       —       445,947  
    Total home equity $ 454,828     $ 838     $ —     $ 17     $ 455,683  
    Residential real estate                  
    Fixed rate $ 13,336     $ 4,473     $ 74,883     $ 1,055,143     $ 1,147,835  
    Variable rate   97,815       623,879       1,815,630       —       2,537,324  
    Total residential real estate $ 111,151     $ 628,352     $ 1,890,513     $ 1,055,143     $ 3,685,159  
    Premium finance receivables – property & casualty                  
    Fixed rate $ 7,135,963     $ 103,899     $ —     $ —     $ 7,239,862  
    Variable rate   —       —       —       —       —  
    Total premium finance receivables – property & casualty $ 7,135,963     $ 103,899     $ —     $ —     $ 7,239,862  
    Premium finance receivables – life insurance                  
    Fixed rate $ 350,802     $ 207,832     $ 4,000     $ 4,248     $ 566,882  
    Variable rate   7,798,258       —       —       —       7,798,258  
    Total premium finance receivables – life insurance $ 8,149,060     $ 207,832     $ 4,000     $ 4,248     $ 8,365,140  
    Consumer and other                  
    Fixed rate $ 44,731     $ 7,937     $ 883     $ 914     $ 54,465  
    Variable rate   61,854       —       —       —       61,854  
    Total consumer and other $ 106,585     $ 7,937     $ 883     $ 914     $ 116,319  
                       
    Total per category                  
    Fixed rate $ 8,617,862     $ 6,687,371     $ 2,567,510     $ 1,144,359     $ 19,017,102  
    Variable rate   27,240,166       635,425       1,815,697       —       29,691,288  
    Total loans, net of unearned income $ 35,858,028     $ 7,322,796     $ 4,383,207     $ 1,144,359     $ 48,708,390  
    Less: Existing cash flow hedging derivatives (1)   (6,700,000 )                
    Total loans repricing or maturing in one year or less, adjusted for cash flow hedging activity $ 29,158,028                  
                       
    Variable Rate Loan Pricing by Index:                  
    SOFR tenors (2)                 $ 18,328,835  
    12- month CMT (3)                   6,722,305  
    Prime                   3,420,624  
    Fed Funds                   819,437  
    Other U.S. Treasury tenors                   190,187  
    Other                   209,900  
    Total variable rate                 $ 29,691,288  

    (1)   Excludes cash flow hedges with future effective starting dates.
    (2)   SOFR – Secured Overnight Financing Rate.
    (3)   CMT – Constant Maturity Treasury Rate.

    Graph available at the following link: http://ml.globenewswire.com/Resource/Download/bebf97a7-5d4d-430d-a436-ae832412a4db

    Source: Bloomberg

    As noted in the table on the previous page, the majority of the Company’s portfolio is tied to SOFR and CMT indices which, as shown in the table above, do not mirror the same changes as the Prime rate, which has historically moved when the Federal Reserve raises or lowers interest rates. Specifically, the Company has variable rate loans of $15.4 billion tied to one-month SOFR and $6.7 billion tied to twelve-month CMT. The above chart shows:

        Basis Point (bp) Change in
        1-month
    SOFR
      12- month CMT   Prime  
    First Quarter 2025   (1 ) bps (13 ) bps 0   bps
    Fourth Quarter 2024   (52 )   18     (50 )  
    Third Quarter 2024   (49 )   (111 )   (50 )  
    Second Quarter 2024   1     6     0    
    First Quarter 2024   (2 )   24     0    

    TABLE 9: ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES

        Three Months Ended
        Mar 31,   Dec 31,   Sep 30,   Jun 30,   Mar 31,
    (Dollars in thousands)     2025       2024       2024       2024       2024  
    Allowance for credit losses at beginning of period   $ 437,060     $ 436,193     $ 437,560     $ 427,504     $ 427,612  
    Provision for credit losses – Other     23,963       16,979       6,787       40,061       21,673  
    Provision for credit losses – Day 1 on non-PCD assets acquired during the period     —       —       15,547       —       —  
    Initial allowance for credit losses recognized on PCD assets acquired during the period     —       —       3,004       —       —  
    Other adjustments     4       (187 )     30       (19 )     (31 )
    Charge-offs:                    
    Commercial     9,722       5,090       22,975       9,584       11,215  
    Commercial real estate     454       1,037       95       15,526       5,469  
    Home equity     —       —       —       —       74  
    Residential real estate     —       114       —       23       38  
    Premium finance receivables – property & casualty     7,114       13,301       7,790       9,486       6,938  
    Premium finance receivables – life insurance     12       —       4       —       —  
    Consumer and other     147       189       154       137       107  
    Total charge-offs     17,449       19,731       31,018       34,756       23,841  
    Recoveries:                    
    Commercial     929       775       649       950       479  
    Commercial real estate     12       172       30       90       31  
    Home equity     216       194       101       35       29  
    Residential real estate     136       0       5       8       2  
    Premium finance receivables – property & casualty     3,487       2,646       3,436       3,658       1,519  
    Premium finance receivables – life insurance     —       —       41       5       8  
    Consumer and other     29       19       21       24       23  
    Total recoveries     4,809       3,806       4,283       4,770       2,091  
    Net charge-offs     (12,640 )     (15,925 )     (26,735 )     (29,986 )     (21,750 )
    Allowance for credit losses at period end   $ 448,387     $ 437,060     $ 436,193     $ 437,560     $ 427,504  
                         
    Annualized net charge-offs (recoveries) by category as a percentage of its own respective category’s average:
    Commercial     0.23 %     0.11 %     0.61 %     0.25 %     0.33 %
    Commercial real estate     0.01       0.03       0.00       0.53       0.19  
    Home equity     (0.20 )     (0.18 )     (0.10 )     (0.04 )     0.05  
    Residential real estate     (0.02 )     0.01       0.00       0.00       0.01  
    Premium finance receivables – property & casualty     0.20       0.59       0.24       0.33       0.32  
    Premium finance receivables – life insurance     0.00       —       (0.00 )     (0.00 )     (0.00 )
    Consumer and other     0.45       0.63       0.63       0.56       0.42  
    Total loans, net of unearned income     0.11 %     0.13 %     0.23 %     0.28 %     0.21 %
                         
    Loans at period end   $ 48,708,390     $ 48,055,037     $ 47,067,447     $ 44,675,531     $ 43,230,706  
    Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of loans at period end     0.78 %     0.76 %     0.77 %     0.81 %     0.81 %
    Allowance for loan and unfunded lending-related commitment losses as a percentage of loans at period end     0.92       0.91       0.93       0.98       0.99  

    PCD – Purchase Credit Deteriorated


    TABLE 10
    : ALLOWANCE AND PROVISION FOR CREDIT LOSSES BY COMPONENT

        Three Months Ended
        Mar 31,   Dec 31,   Sep 30,   Jun 30,   Mar 31,
    (In thousands)     2025       2024       2024       2024       2024  
    Provision for loan losses – Other   $ 26,826     $ 19,852     $ 6,782     $ 45,111     $ 26,159  
    Provision for credit losses – Day 1 on non-PCD assets acquired during the period     —       —       15,547       —       —  
    Provision for unfunded lending-related commitments losses – Other     (2,852 )     (2,851 )     17       (5,212 )     (4,468 )
    Provision for held-to-maturity securities losses     (11 )     (22 )     (12 )     162       (18 )
    Provision for credit losses   $ 23,963     $ 16,979     $ 22,334     $ 40,061     $ 21,673  
                         
    Allowance for loan losses   $ 378,207     $ 364,017     $ 360,279     $ 363,719     $ 348,612  
    Allowance for unfunded lending-related commitments losses     69,734       72,586       75,435       73,350       78,563  
    Allowance for loan losses and unfunded lending-related commitments losses     447,941       436,603       435,714       437,069       427,175  
    Allowance for held-to-maturity securities losses     446       457       479       491       329  
    Allowance for credit losses   $ 448,387     $ 437,060     $ 436,193     $ 437,560     $ 427,504  

    PCD – Purchase Credit Deteriorated 


    TABLE 11: ALLOWANCE BY LOAN PORTFOLIO

    The table below summarizes the calculation of allowance for loan losses and allowance for unfunded lending-related commitments losses for the Company’s loan portfolios as well as core and niche portfolios, as of March 31, 2025, December 31, 2024 and September 30, 2024.

      As of Mar 31, 2025 As of Dec 31, 2024 As of Sep 30, 2024
    (Dollars in thousands) Recorded
    Investment
      Calculated
    Allowance
      % of its
    category’s balance
    Recorded
    Investment
      Calculated
    Allowance
      % of its
    category’s balance
    Recorded
    Investment
      Calculated
    Allowance
      % of its
    category’s balance
    Commercial:                              
    Commercial, industrial and other $ 15,931,326   $ 201,183   1.26 % $ 15,574,551   $ 175,837   1.13 % $ 15,247,693   $ 171,598   1.13 %
    Commercial real estate:                              
    Construction and development   2,448,881     71,388   2.92     2,434,081     87,236   3.58     2,403,690     97,949   4.07  
    Non-construction   10,466,020     138,622   1.32     10,469,863     135,620   1.30     10,389,727     133,195   1.28  
    Total commercial real estate $ 12,914,901   $ 210,010   1.63 % $ 12,903,944   $ 222,856   1.73 % $ 12,793,417   $ 231,144   1.81 %
    Total commercial and commercial real estate $ 28,846,227   $ 411,193   1.43 % $ 28,478,495   $ 398,693   1.40 % $ 28,041,110   $ 402,742   1.44 %
    Home equity   455,683     9,139   2.01     445,028     8,943   2.01     427,043     8,823   2.07  
    Residential real estate   3,685,159     10,652   0.29     3,612,765     10,335   0.29     3,388,038     9,745   0.29  
    Premium finance receivables                              
    Property and casualty insurance   7,239,862     15,310   0.21     7,272,042     17,111   0.24     7,131,681     13,045   0.18  
    Life insurance   8,365,140     729   0.01     8,147,145     709   0.01     7,996,899     698   0.01  
    Consumer and other   116,319     918   0.79     99,562     812   0.82     82,676     661   0.80  
    Total loans, net of unearned income $ 48,708,390   $ 447,941   0.92 % $ 48,055,037   $ 436,603   0.91 % $ 47,067,447   $ 435,714   0.93 %
                                   
    Total core loans (1) $ 29,108,500   $ 397,664   1.37 % $ 28,804,138   $ 392,319   1.36 % $ 28,363,712   $ 396,394   1.40 %
    Total niche loans (1)   19,599,890     50,277   0.26     19,250,899     44,284   0.23     18,703,735     39,320   0.21  

    (1)   See Table 1 for additional detail on core and niche loans.


    TABLE 12
    : LOAN PORTFOLIO AGING

    (In thousands)   Mar 31, 2025   Dec 31, 2024   Sep 30, 2024   Jun 30, 2024   Mar 31, 2024
    Loan Balances:                    
    Commercial                    
    Nonaccrual   $ 70,560     $ 73,490     $ 63,826     $ 51,087     $ 31,740  
    90+ days and still accruing     46       104       20       304       27  
    60-89 days past due     15,243       54,844       32,560       16,485       30,248  
    30-59 days past due     97,397       92,551       46,057       36,358       77,715  
    Current     15,748,080       15,353,562       15,105,230       14,050,228       13,363,751  
    Total commercial   $ 15,931,326     $ 15,574,551     $ 15,247,693     $ 14,154,462     $ 13,503,481  
    Commercial real estate                    
    Nonaccrual   $ 26,187     $ 21,042     $ 42,071     $ 48,289     $ 39,262  
    90+ days and still accruing     —       —       225       —       —  
    60-89 days past due     6,995       10,521       13,439       6,555       16,713  
    30-59 days past due     83,653       30,766       48,346       38,065       32,998  
    Current     12,798,066       12,841,615       12,689,336       11,854,288       11,544,464  
    Total commercial real estate   $ 12,914,901     $ 12,903,944     $ 12,793,417     $ 11,947,197     $ 11,633,437  
    Home equity                    
    Nonaccrual   $ 2,070     $ 1,117     $ 1,122     $ 1,100     $ 838  
    90+ days and still accruing     —       —       —       —       —  
    60-89 days past due     984       1,233       1,035       275       212  
    30-59 days past due     3,403       2,148       2,580       1,229       1,617  
    Current     449,226       440,530       422,306       353,709       337,682  
    Total home equity   $ 455,683     $ 445,028     $ 427,043     $ 356,313     $ 340,349  
    Residential real estate                    
    Early buy-out loans guaranteed by U.S. government agencies (1)   $ 123,742     $ 156,756     $ 135,389     $ 134,178     $ 143,350  
    Nonaccrual     22,522       23,762       17,959       18,198       17,901  
    90+ days and still accruing     —       —       —       —       —  
    60-89 days past due     1,351       5,708       6,364       1,977       —  
    30-59 days past due     38,943       18,917       2,160       130       24,523  
    Current     3,498,601       3,407,622       3,226,166       2,912,852       2,704,492  
    Total residential real estate   $ 3,685,159     $ 3,612,765     $ 3,388,038     $ 3,067,335     $ 2,890,266  
    Premium finance receivables – property & casualty                    
    Nonaccrual   $ 29,846     $ 28,797     $ 36,079     $ 32,722     $ 32,648  
    90+ days and still accruing     18,081       16,031       18,235       22,427       25,877  
    60-89 days past due     19,717       19,042       18,740       29,925       15,274  
    30-59 days past due     39,459       68,219       30,204       45,927       59,729  
    Current     7,132,759       7,139,953       7,028,423       6,969,752       6,806,491  
    Total Premium finance receivables – property & casualty   $ 7,239,862     $ 7,272,042     $ 7,131,681     $ 7,100,753     $ 6,940,019  
    Premium finance receivables – life insurance                    
    Nonaccrual   $ —     $ 6,431     $ —     $ —     $ —  
    90+ days and still accruing     2,962       —       —       —       —  
    60-89 days past due     10,587       72,963       10,902       4,118       32,482  
    30-59 days past due     29,924       36,405       74,432       17,693       100,137  
    Current     8,321,667       8,031,346       7,911,565       7,940,304       7,739,414  
    Total Premium finance receivables – life insurance   $ 8,365,140     $ 8,147,145     $ 7,996,899     $ 7,962,115     $ 7,872,033  
    Consumer and other                    
    Nonaccrual   $ 18     $ 2     $ 2     $ 3     $ 19  
    90+ days and still accruing     98       47       148       121       47  
    60-89 days past due     162       59       22       81       16  
    30-59 days past due     542       882       264       366       210  
    Current     115,499       98,572       82,240       86,785       50,829  
    Total consumer and other   $ 116,319     $ 99,562     $ 82,676     $ 87,356     $ 51,121  
    Total loans, net of unearned income                    
    Early buy-out loans guaranteed by U.S. government agencies (1)   $ 123,742     $ 156,756     $ 135,389     $ 134,178     $ 143,350  
    Nonaccrual     151,203       154,641       161,059       151,399       122,408  
    90+ days and still accruing     21,187       16,182       18,628       22,852       25,951  
    60-89 days past due     55,039       164,370       83,062       59,416       94,945  
    30-59 days past due     293,321       249,888       204,043       139,768       296,929  
    Current     48,063,898       47,313,200       46,465,266       44,167,918       42,547,123  
    Total loans, net of unearned income   $ 48,708,390     $ 48,055,037     $ 47,067,447     $ 44,675,531     $ 43,230,706  

    (1)   Early buy-out loans are insured or guaranteed by the Federal Housing Administration or the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, subject to indemnifications and insurance limits for certain loans.


    TABLE 13:
    NON-PERFORMING ASSETS(1)

      Mar 31,   Dec 31,   Sep 30,   Jun 30,   Mar 31,
    (Dollars in thousands)   2025       2024       2024       2024       2024  
    Loans past due greater than 90 days and still accruing:                  
    Commercial $ 46     $ 104     $ 20     $ 304     $ 27  
    Commercial real estate   —       —       225       —       —  
    Home equity   —       —       —       —       —  
    Residential real estate   —       —       —       —       —  
    Premium finance receivables – property & casualty   18,081       16,031       18,235       22,427       25,877  
    Premium finance receivables – life insurance   2,962       —       —       —       —  
    Consumer and other   98       47       148       121       47  
    Total loans past due greater than 90 days and still accruing   21,187       16,182       18,628       22,852       25,951  
    Non-accrual loans:                  
    Commercial   70,560       73,490       63,826       51,087       31,740  
    Commercial real estate   26,187       21,042       42,071       48,289       39,262  
    Home equity   2,070       1,117       1,122       1,100       838  
    Residential real estate   22,522       23,762       17,959       18,198       17,901  
    Premium finance receivables – property & casualty   29,846       28,797       36,079       32,722       32,648  
    Premium finance receivables – life insurance   —       6,431       —       —       —  
    Consumer and other   18       2       2       3       19  
    Total non-accrual loans   151,203       154,641       161,059       151,399       122,408  
    Total non-performing loans:                  
    Commercial   70,606       73,594       63,846       51,391       31,767  
    Commercial real estate   26,187       21,042       42,296       48,289       39,262  
    Home equity   2,070       1,117       1,122       1,100       838  
    Residential real estate   22,522       23,762       17,959       18,198       17,901  
    Premium finance receivables – property & casualty   47,927       44,828       54,314       55,149       58,525  
    Premium finance receivables – life insurance   2,962       6,431       —       —       —  
    Consumer and other   116       49       150       124       66  
    Total non-performing loans $ 172,390     $ 170,823     $ 179,687     $ 174,251     $ 148,359  
    Other real estate owned   22,625       23,116       13,682       19,731       14,538  
    Total non-performing assets $ 195,015     $ 193,939     $ 193,369     $ 193,982     $ 162,897  
    Total non-performing loans by category as a percent of its own respective category’s period-end balance:                  
    Commercial   0.44 %     0.47 %     0.42 %     0.36 %     0.24 %
    Commercial real estate   0.20       0.16       0.33       0.40       0.34  
    Home equity   0.45       0.25       0.26       0.31       0.25  
    Residential real estate   0.61       0.66       0.53       0.59       0.62  
    Premium finance receivables – property & casualty   0.66       0.62       0.76       0.78       0.84  
    Premium finance receivables – life insurance   0.04       0.08       —       —       —  
    Consumer and other   0.10       0.05       0.18       0.14       0.13  
    Total loans, net of unearned income   0.35 %     0.36 %     0.38 %     0.39 %     0.34 %
    Total non-performing assets as a percentage of total assets   0.30 %     0.30 %     0.30 %     0.32 %     0.28 %
    Allowance for loan losses and unfunded lending-related commitments losses as a percentage of non-accrual loans   296.25 %     282.33 %     270.53 %     288.69 %     348.98 %
                       

    (1)   Excludes early buy-out loans guaranteed by U.S. government agencies. Early buy-out loans are insured or guaranteed by the Federal Housing Administration or the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, subject to indemnifications and insurance limits for certain loans.

    Non-performing Loans Rollforward, excluding early buy-out loans guaranteed by U.S. government agencies

      Three Months Ended
      Mar 31,   Dec 31,   Sep 30,   Jun 30,   Mar 31,
    (In thousands)   2025       2024       2024       2024       2024  
                       
    Balance at beginning of period $ 170,823     $ 179,687     $ 174,251     $ 148,359     $ 139,030  
    Additions from becoming non-performing in the respective period   27,721       30,931       42,335       54,376       23,142  
    Additions from assets acquired in the respective period   —       —       189       —       —  
    Return to performing status   (1,207 )     (1,108 )     (362 )     (912 )     (490 )
    Payments received   (15,965 )     (12,219 )     (10,894 )     (9,611 )     (8,336 )
    Transfer to OREO and other repossessed assets   —       (17,897 )     (3,680 )     (6,945 )     (1,381 )
    Charge-offs, net   (8,600 )     (5,612 )     (21,211 )     (7,673 )     (14,810 )
    Net change for premium finance receivables   (382 )     (2,959 )     (941 )     (3,343 )     11,204  
    Balance at end of period $ 172,390     $ 170,823     $ 179,687     $ 174,251     $ 148,359  


    Other Real Estate Owned

      Three Months Ended
      Mar 31,   Dec 31,   Sep 30,   Jun 30,   Mar 31,
    (In thousands)   2025       2024       2024       2024       2024  
    Balance at beginning of period $ 23,116     $ 13,682     $ 19,731     $ 14,538     $ 13,309  
    Disposals/resolved   —       (8,545 )     (9,729 )     (1,752 )     —  
    Transfers in at fair value, less costs to sell   —       17,979       3,680       6,945       1,436  
    Fair value adjustments   (491 )     —       —       —       (207 )
    Balance at end of period $ 22,625     $ 23,116     $ 13,682     $ 19,731     $ 14,538  
                       
      Period End
      Mar 31,   Dec 31,   Sep 30,   Jun 30,   Mar 31,
    Balance by Property Type:   2025       2024       2024       2024       2024  
    Residential real estate $ —     $ —     $ —     $ 161     $ 1,146  
    Commercial real estate   22,625       23,116       13,682       19,570       13,392  
    Total $ 22,625     $ 23,116     $ 13,682     $ 19,731     $ 14,538  

    TABLE 14: NON-INTEREST INCOME

      Three Months Ended Q1 2025 compared to
    Q4 2024
    Q1 2025 compared to
    Q1 2024
      Mar 31,   Dec 31,   Sep 30,   Jun 30,   Mar 31,
    (Dollars in thousands)   2025       2024       2024       2024       2024   $ Change   % Change $ Change   % Change
    Brokerage $ 4,757     $ 5,328     $ 6,139     $ 5,588     $ 5,556   $ (571 )   (11 )% $ (799 )   (14 )%
    Trust and asset management   29,285       33,447       31,085       29,825       29,259     (4,162 )   (12 )   26     0  
    Total wealth management   34,042       38,775       37,224       35,413       34,815     (4,733 )   (12 )   (773 )   (2 )
    Mortgage banking   20,529       20,452       15,974       29,124       27,663     77     0     (7,134 )   (26 )
    Service charges on deposit accounts   19,362       18,864       16,430       15,546       14,811     498     3     4,551     31  
    Gains (losses) on investment securities, net   3,196       (2,835 )     3,189       (4,282 )     1,326     6,031     NM   1,870     NM
    Fees from covered call options   3,446       2,305       988       2,056       4,847     1,141     50     (1,401 )   (29 )
    Trading (losses) gains, net   (64 )     (113 )     (130 )     70       677     49     (43 )   (741 )   NM
    Operating lease income, net   15,287       15,327       15,335       13,938       14,110     (40 )   (0 )   1,177     8  
    Other:                              
    Interest rate swap fees   2,269       3,360       2,914       3,392       2,828     (1,091 )   (32 )   (559 )   (20 )
    BOLI   796       1,236       1,517       1,351       1,651     (440 )   (36 )   (855 )   (52 )
    Administrative services   1,393       1,347       1,450       1,322       1,217     46     3     176     14  
    Foreign currency remeasurement (losses) gains   (183 )     (682 )     696       (145 )     (1,171 )   499     (73 )   988     (84 )
    Changes in fair value on EBOs and loans held-for-investment   383       129       518       604       (439 )   254     NM   822     NM
    Early pay-offs of capital leases   768       514       532       393       430     254     49     338     79  
    Miscellaneous   15,410       14,772       16,510       22,365       37,815     638     4     (22,405 )   (59 )
    Total Other   20,836       20,676       24,137       29,282       42,331     160     1     (21,495 )   (51 )
    Total Non-Interest Income $ 116,634     $ 113,451     $ 113,147     $ 121,147     $ 140,580   $ 3,183     3 % $ (23,946 )   (17 )%

    NM – Not meaningful.
    BOLI- Bank-owned life insurance.
    EBO- Early buy-out.


    TABLE 15: MORTGAGE BANKING

      Three Months Ended
    (Dollars in thousands) Mar 31,
    2025
      Dec 31,
    2024
      Sep 30,
    2024
      Jun 30,
    2024
      Mar 31,
    2024
    Originations:                  
    Retail originations $ 348,468     $ 483,424     $ 527,408     $ 544,394     $ 331,504  
    Veterans First originations   111,985       176,914       239,369       177,792       144,109  
    Total originations for sale (A) $ 460,453     $ 660,338     $ 766,777     $ 722,186     $ 475,613  
    Originations for investment   217,177       355,119       218,984       275,331       169,246  
    Total originations $ 677,630     $ 1,015,457     $ 985,761     $ 997,517     $ 644,859  
    As a percentage of originations for sale:                  
    Retail originations   76 %     73 %     69 %     75 %     70 %
    Veterans First originations   24       27       31       25       30  
    Purchases   77 %     65 %     72 %     83 %     75 %
    Refinances   23       35       28       17       25  
    Production Margin:                  
    Production revenue (B) (1) $ 9,941     $ 6,993     $ 13,113     $ 14,990     $ 13,435  
    Total originations for sale (A) $ 460,453     $ 660,338     $ 766,777     $ 722,186     $ 475,613  
    Add: Current period end mandatory interest rate lock commitments to fund originations for sale (2)   197,297       103,946       272,072       222,738       207,775  
    Less: Prior period end mandatory interest rate lock commitments to fund originations for sale (2)   103,946       272,072       222,738       207,775       119,624  
    Total mortgage production volume (C) $ 553,804     $ 492,212     $ 816,111     $ 737,149     $ 563,764  
    Production margin (B / C)   1.80 %     1.42 %     1.61 %     2.03 %     2.38 %
    Mortgage Servicing:                  
    Loans serviced for others (D) $ 12,402,352     $ 12,400,913     $ 12,253,361     $ 12,211,027     $ 12,051,392  
    Mortgage Servicing Rights (“MSR”), at fair value (E)   196,307       203,788       186,308       204,610       201,044  
    Percentage of MSRs to loans serviced for others (E / D)   1.58 %     1.64 %     1.52 %     1.68 %     1.67 %
    Servicing income $ 10,611     $ 10,731     $ 10,809     $ 10,586     $ 10,498  
    MSR Fair Value Asset Activity                  
    MSR – FV at Beginning of Period $ 203,788     $ 186,308     $ 204,610     $ 201,044     $ 192,456  
    MSR – current period capitalization   4,669       10,010       6,357       8,223       5,379  
    MSR – collection of expected cash flows – paydowns   (1,590 )     (1,463 )     (1,598 )     (1,504 )     (1,444 )
    MSR – collection of expected cash flows – payoffs and repurchases   (3,046 )     (4,315 )     (5,730 )     (4,030 )     (2,942 )
    MSR – changes in fair value model assumptions   (7,514 )     13,248       (17,331 )     877       7,595  
    MSR Fair Value at end of period $ 196,307     $ 203,788     $ 186,308     $ 204,610     $ 201,044  
    Summary of Mortgage Banking Revenue:                
    Operational:                  
    Production revenue (1) $ 9,941     $ 6,993     $ 13,113     $ 14,990     $ 13,435  
    MSR – Current period capitalization   4,669       10,010       6,357       8,223       5,379  
    MSR – Collection of expected cash flows – paydowns   (1,590 )     (1,463 )     (1,598 )     (1,504 )     (1,444 )
    MSR – Collection of expected cash flows – pay offs   (3,046 )     (4,315 )     (5,730 )     (4,030 )     (2,942 )
    Servicing Income   10,611       10,731       10,809       10,586       10,498  
    Other Revenue   (172 )     (51 )     (67 )     112       (91 )
    Total operational mortgage banking revenue $ 20,413     $ 21,905     $ 22,884     $ 28,377     $ 24,835  
    Fair Value:                  
    MSR – changes in fair value model assumptions $ (7,514 )   $ 13,248     $ (17,331 )   $ 877     $ 7,595  
    Gain (loss) on derivative contract held as an economic hedge, net   4,897       (11,452 )     6,892       (772 )     (2,577 )
    Changes in FV on early buy-out loans guaranteed by US Govt (HFS)   2,733       (3,249 )     3,529       642       (2,190 )
    Total fair value mortgage banking revenue $ 116     $ (1,453 )   $ (6,910 )   $ 747     $ 2,828  
    Total mortgage banking revenue $ 20,529     $ 20,452     $ 15,974     $ 29,124     $ 27,663  

    (1)   Production revenue represents revenue earned from the origination and subsequent sale of mortgages, including gains on loans sold and fees from originations, changes in other related financial instruments carried at fair value, processing and other related activities, and excludes servicing fees, changes in the fair value of servicing rights and changes to the mortgage recourse obligation and other non-production revenue.
    (2)   Certain volume adjusted for the estimated pull-through rate of the loan, which represents the Company’s best estimate of the likelihood that a committed loan will ultimately fund.


    TABLE 16
    : NON-INTEREST EXPENSE

      Three Months Ended Q1 2025 compared to
    Q4 2024
    Q1 2025 compared to
    Q1 2024
      Mar 31,   Dec 31,   Sep 30,   Jun 30,   Mar 31,
    (Dollars in thousands)   2025       2024       2024       2024       2024   $ Change   % Change $ Change   % Change
    Salaries and employee benefits:                              
    Salaries $ 123,917     $ 120,969     $ 118,971     $ 113,860     $ 112,172   $ 2,948     2 % $ 11,745     10 %
    Commissions and incentive compensation   52,536       54,792       57,575       52,151       51,001     (2,256 )   (4 )   1,535     3  
    Benefits   35,073       36,372       34,715       32,530       32,000     (1,299 )   (4 )   3,073     10  
    Total salaries and employee benefits   211,526       212,133       211,261       198,541       195,173     (607 )   (0 )   16,353     8  
    Software and equipment   34,717       34,258       31,574       29,231       27,731     459     1     6,986     25  
    Operating lease equipment   10,471       10,263       10,518       10,834       10,683     208     2     (212 )   (2 )
    Occupancy, net   20,778       20,597       19,945       19,585       19,086     181     1     1,692     9  
    Data processing   11,274       10,957       9,984       9,503       9,292     317     3     1,982     21  
    Advertising and marketing   12,272       13,097       18,239       17,436       13,040     (825 )   (6 )   (768 )   (6 )
    Professional fees   9,044       11,334       9,783       9,967       9,553     (2,290 )   (20 )   (509 )   (5 )
    Amortization of other acquisition-related intangible assets   5,618       5,773       4,042       1,122       1,158     (155 )   (3 )   4,460     NM
    FDIC insurance   10,926       10,640       10,512       10,429       9,381     286     3     1,545     16  
    FDIC insurance – special assessment   —       —       —       —       5,156     —     —     (5,156 )   (100 )
    OREO expense, net   643       397       (938 )     (259 )     392     246     62     251     64  
    Other:                              
    Lending expenses, net of deferred origination costs   5,866       6,448       4,995       5,335       5,078     (582 )   (9 )   788     16  
    Travel and entertainment   5,270       8,140       5,364       5,340       4,597     (2,870 )   (35 )   673     15  
    Miscellaneous   27,685       24,502       25,408       23,289       22,825     3,183     13     4,860     21  
    Total other   38,821       39,090       35,767       33,964       32,500     (269 )   (1 )   6,321     19  
    Total Non-Interest Expense $ 366,090     $ 368,539     $ 360,687     $ 340,353     $ 333,145   $ (2,449 )   (1 )% $ 32,945     10 %

    NM – Not meaningful.


    TABLE 17: SUPPLEMENTAL NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES/RATIOS

    The accounting and reporting policies of Wintrust conform to generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) in the United States and prevailing practices in the banking industry. However, certain non-GAAP performance measures and ratios are used by management to evaluate and measure the Company’s performance. These include taxable-equivalent net interest income (including its individual components), taxable-equivalent net interest margin (including its individual components), the taxable-equivalent efficiency ratio, tangible common equity ratio, tangible book value per common share, return on average tangible common equity, and pre-tax income, excluding provision for credit losses. Management believes that these measures and ratios provide users of the Company’s financial information a more meaningful view of the performance of the Company’s interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and of the Company’s operating efficiency. Other financial holding companies may define or calculate these measures and ratios differently.

    Management reviews yields on certain asset categories and the net interest margin of the Company and its banking subsidiaries on a fully taxable-equivalent basis (“FTE”). In this non-GAAP presentation, net interest income is adjusted to reflect tax-exempt interest income on an equivalent before-tax basis using tax rates effective as of the end of the period. This measure ensures comparability of net interest income arising from both taxable and tax-exempt sources. Net interest income on a FTE basis is also used in the calculation of the Company’s efficiency ratio. The efficiency ratio, which is calculated by dividing non-interest expense by total taxable-equivalent net revenue (less securities gains or losses), measures how much it costs to produce one dollar of revenue. Securities gains or losses are excluded from this calculation to better match revenue from daily operations to operational expenses. Management considers the tangible common equity ratio and tangible book value per common share as useful measurements of the Company’s equity. The Company references the return on average tangible common equity as a measurement of profitability. Management considers pre-tax income, excluding provision for credit losses, as a useful measurement of the Company’s core net income.

      Three Months Ended
      Mar 31,   Dec 31,   Sep 30,   Jun 30,   Mar 31,
    (Dollars and shares in thousands) 2025   2024   2024   2024   2024
    Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Net Interest Margin and Efficiency Ratio:
    (A) Interest Income (GAAP) $ 886,965     $ 913,501     $ 908,604     $ 849,979     $ 805,513  
    Taxable-equivalent adjustment:                  
    – Loans   2,206       2,352       2,474       2,305       2,246  
    – Liquidity Management Assets   690       716       668       567       550  
    – Other Earning Assets   3       2       2       3       5  
    (B) Interest Income (non-GAAP) $ 889,864     $ 916,571     $ 911,748     $ 852,854     $ 808,314  
    (C) Interest Expense (GAAP)   360,491       388,353       406,021       379,369       341,319  
    (D) Net Interest Income (GAAP) (A minus C) $ 526,474     $ 525,148     $ 502,583     $ 470,610     $ 464,194  
    (E) Net Interest Income (non-GAAP) (B minus C) $ 529,373     $ 528,218     $ 505,727     $ 473,485     $ 466,995  
    Net interest margin (GAAP)   3.54 %     3.49 %     3.49 %     3.50 %     3.57 %
    Net interest margin, fully taxable-equivalent (non-GAAP)   3.56       3.51       3.51       3.52       3.59  
    (F) Non-interest income $ 116,634     $ 113,451     $ 113,147     $ 121,147     $ 140,580  
    (G) Gains (losses) on investment securities, net   3,196       (2,835 )     3,189       (4,282 )     1,326  
    (H) Non-interest expense   366,090       368,539       360,687       340,353       333,145  
    Efficiency ratio (H/(D+F-G))   57.21 %     57.46 %     58.88 %     57.10 %     55.21 %
    Efficiency ratio (non-GAAP) (H/(E+F-G))   56.95       57.18       58.58       56.83       54.95  
      Three Months Ended
      Mar 31,   Dec 31,   Sep 30,   Jun 30,   Mar 31,
    (Dollars and shares in thousands) 2025   2024   2024   2024   2024
    Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Tangible Common Equity Ratio:
    Total shareholders’ equity (GAAP) $ 6,600,537     $ 6,344,297     $ 6,399,714     $ 5,536,628     $ 5,436,400  
    Less: Non-convertible preferred stock (GAAP)   (412,500 )     (412,500 )     (412,500 )     (412,500 )     (412,500 )
    Less: Intangible assets (GAAP)   (913,004 )     (918,632 )     (924,646 )     (676,562 )     (677,911 )
    (I) Total tangible common shareholders’ equity (non-GAAP) $ 5,275,033     $ 5,013,165     $ 5,062,568     $ 4,447,566     $ 4,345,989  
    (J) Total assets (GAAP) $ 65,870,066     $ 64,879,668     $ 63,788,424     $ 59,781,516     $ 57,576,933  
    Less: Intangible assets (GAAP)   (913,004 )     (918,632 )     (924,646 )     (676,562 )     (677,911 )
    (K) Total tangible assets (non-GAAP) $ 64,957,062     $ 63,961,036     $ 62,863,778     $ 59,104,954     $ 56,899,022  
    Common equity to assets ratio (GAAP) (L/J)   9.4 %     9.1 %     9.4 %     8.6 %     8.7 %
    Tangible common equity ratio (non-GAAP) (I/K)   8.1       7.8       8.1       7.5       7.6  
    Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Tangible Book Value per Common Share:
    Total shareholders’ equity $ 6,600,537     $ 6,344,297     $ 6,399,714     $ 5,536,628     $ 5,436,400  
    Less: Preferred stock   (412,500 )     (412,500 )     (412,500 )     (412,500 )     (412,500 )
    (L) Total common equity $ 6,188,037     $ 5,931,797     $ 5,987,214     $ 5,124,128     $ 5,023,900  
    (M) Actual common shares outstanding   66,919       66,495       66,482       61,760       61,737  
    Book value per common share (L/M) $ 92.47     $ 89.21     $ 90.06     $ 82.97     $ 81.38  
    Tangible book value per common share (non-GAAP) (I/M)   78.83       75.39       76.15       72.01       70.40  
                       
    Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Return on Average Tangible Common Equity:
    (N) Net income applicable to common shares $ 182,048     $ 178,371     $ 163,010     $ 145,397     $ 180,303  
    Add: Intangible asset amortization   5,618       5,773       4,042       1,122       1,158  
    Less: Tax effect of intangible asset amortization   (1,421 )     (1,547 )     (1,087 )     (311 )     (291 )
    After-tax intangible asset amortization $ 4,197     $ 4,226     $ 2,955     $ 811     $ 867  
    (O) Tangible net income applicable to common shares (non-GAAP) $ 186,245     $ 182,597     $ 165,965     $ 146,208     $ 181,170  
    Total average shareholders’ equity $ 6,460,941     $ 6,418,403     $ 5,990,429     $ 5,450,173     $ 5,440,457  
    Less: Average preferred stock   (412,500 )     (412,500 )     (412,500 )     (412,500 )     (412,500 )
    (P) Total average common shareholders’ equity $ 6,048,441     $ 6,005,903     $ 5,577,929     $ 5,037,673     $ 5,027,957  
    Less: Average intangible assets   (916,069 )     (921,438 )     (833,574 )     (677,207 )     (678,731 )
    (Q) Total average tangible common shareholders’ equity (non-GAAP) $ 5,132,372     $ 5,084,465     $ 4,744,355     $ 4,360,466     $ 4,349,226  
    Return on average common equity, annualized (N/P)   12.21 %     11.82 %     11.63 %     11.61 %     14.42 %
    Return on average tangible common equity, annualized (non-GAAP) (O/Q)   14.72       14.29       13.92       13.49       16.75  
                       
    Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Pre-Tax, Pre-Provision Income:    
    Income before taxes $ 253,055     $ 253,081     $ 232,709     $ 211,343     $ 249,956  
    Add: Provision for credit losses   23,963       16,979       22,334       40,061       21,673  
    Pre-tax income, excluding provision for credit losses (non-GAAP) $ 277,018     $ 270,060     $ 255,043     $ 251,404     $ 271,629  

    WINTRUST SUBSIDIARIES

    Wintrust is a financial holding company whose common stock is traded on the Nasdaq Global Select Market (Nasdaq: WTFC) that operates bank retail locations in the greater Chicago, southern Wisconsin, west Michigan, northwest Indiana, and southwest Florida market areas. Its 16 community bank subsidiaries are: Barrington Bank & Trust Company, N.A., Beverly Bank & Trust Company, N.A., Crystal Lake Bank & Trust Company, N.A., Hinsdale Bank & Trust Company, N.A., Lake Forest Bank & Trust Company, N.A., Libertyville Bank & Trust Company, N.A., Macatawa Bank, N.A., Northbrook Bank & Trust Company, N.A., Old Plank Trail Community Bank, N.A., Schaumburg Bank & Trust Company, N.A., St. Charles Bank & Trust Company, N.A., State Bank of The Lakes, N.A., Town Bank, N.A., Village Bank & Trust, N.A., Wheaton Bank & Trust Company, N.A., and Wintrust Bank, N.A.

    Additionally, the Company operates various non-bank businesses:

    • FIRST Insurance Funding and Wintrust Life Finance, each a division of Lake Forest Bank & Trust Company, N.A., serve commercial and life insurance loan customers, respectively, throughout the United States.
    • First Insurance Funding of Canada serves commercial insurance loan customers throughout Canada.
    • Tricom, Inc. of Milwaukee provides high-yielding, short-term accounts receivable financing and value-added out-sourced administrative services, such as data processing of payrolls, billing and cash management services, to temporary staffing service clients located throughout the United States.
    • Wintrust Mortgage, a division of Barrington Bank & Trust Company, N.A., engages primarily in the origination and purchase of residential mortgages for sale into the secondary market through origination offices located throughout the United States. Loans are also originated nationwide through relationships with wholesale and correspondent offices.
    • Wintrust Investments, LLC is a broker-dealer providing a full range of private client and brokerage services to clients and correspondent banks located primarily in the Midwest.
    • Great Lakes Advisors LLC provides money management services and advisory services to individual accounts.
    • Wintrust Private Trust Company, N.A., a trust subsidiary, allows Wintrust to service customers’ trust and investment needs at each banking location.
    • Wintrust Asset Finance offers direct leasing opportunities.
    • CDEC provides Qualified Intermediary services (as defined by U.S. Treasury regulations) for taxpayers seeking to structure tax-deferred like-kind exchanges under Internal Revenue Code Section 1031.

    FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

    This document contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws. Forward-looking information can be identified through the use of words such as “intend,” “plan,” “project,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “contemplate,” “possible,” “will,” “may,” “should,” “would” and “could.” Forward-looking statements and information are not historical facts, are premised on many factors and assumptions, and represent only management’s expectations, estimates and projections regarding future events. Similarly, these statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks and uncertainties that are difficult to predict, and which may include, but are not limited to, those listed below and the Risk Factors discussed under Item 1A of the Company’s 2024 Annual Report on Form 10-K and in any of the Company’s subsequent SEC filings. The Company intends such forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and is including this statement for purposes of invoking these safe harbor provisions. Such forward-looking statements may be deemed to include, among other things, statements relating to the Company’s future financial performance, the performance of its loan portfolio, the expected amount of future credit reserves and charge-offs, delinquency trends, growth plans, regulatory developments, securities that the Company may offer from time to time, and management’s long-term performance goals, as well as statements relating to the anticipated effects on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations from expected developments or events, the Company’s business and growth strategies, including future acquisitions of banks, specialty finance or wealth management businesses, internal growth and plans to form additional de novo banks or branch offices. Actual results could differ materially from those addressed in the forward-looking statements as a result of numerous factors, including the following:

    • economic conditions and events that affect the economy, housing prices, the job market and other factors that may adversely affect the Company’s liquidity and the performance of its loan portfolios, including an actual or threatened U.S. government debt default or rating downgrade, particularly in the markets in which it operates;
    • negative effects suffered by us or our customers resulting from changes in U.S. or international trade policies;
    • the extent of defaults and losses on the Company’s loan portfolio, which may require further increases in its allowance for credit losses;
    • estimates of fair value of certain of the Company’s assets and liabilities, which could change in value significantly from period to period;
    • the financial success and economic viability of the borrowers of our commercial loans;
    • commercial real estate market conditions in the Chicago metropolitan area and southern Wisconsin;
    • the extent of commercial and consumer delinquencies and declines in real estate values, which may require further increases in the Company’s allowance for credit losses;
    • inaccurate assumptions in our analytical and forecasting models used to manage our loan portfolio;
    • changes in the level and volatility of interest rates, the capital markets and other market indices that may affect, among other things, the Company’s liquidity and the value of its assets and liabilities;
    • the interest rate environment, including a prolonged period of low interest rates or rising interest rates, either broadly or for some types of instruments, which may affect the Company’s net interest income and net interest margin, and which could materially adversely affect the Company’s profitability;
    • competitive pressures in the financial services business which may affect the pricing of the Company’s loan and deposit products as well as its services (including wealth management services), which may result in loss of market share and reduced income from deposits, loans, advisory fees and income from other products;
    • failure to identify and complete favorable acquisitions in the future or unexpected losses, difficulties or developments related to the Company’s recent or future acquisitions;
    • unexpected difficulties and losses related to FDIC-assisted acquisitions;
    • harm to the Company’s reputation;
    • any negative perception of the Company’s financial strength;
    • ability of the Company to raise additional capital on acceptable terms when needed;
    • disruption in capital markets, which may lower fair values for the Company’s investment portfolio;
    • ability of the Company to use technology to provide products and services that will satisfy customer demands and create efficiencies in operations and to manage risks associated therewith;
    • failure or breaches of our security systems or infrastructure, or those of third parties;
    • security breaches, including denial of service attacks, hacking, social engineering attacks, malware intrusion and similar events or data corruption attempts and identity theft;
    • adverse effects on our information technology systems, or those of third parties, resulting from failures, human error or cyberattacks (including ransomware);
    • adverse effects of failures by our vendors to provide agreed upon services in the manner and at the cost agreed, particularly our information technology vendors;
    • increased costs as a result of protecting our customers from the impact of stolen debit card information;
    • accuracy and completeness of information the Company receives about customers and counterparties to make credit decisions;
    • ability of the Company to attract and retain senior management experienced in the banking and financial services industries;
    • environmental liability risk associated with lending activities;
    • the impact of any claims or legal actions to which the Company is subject, including any effect on our reputation;
    • losses incurred in connection with repurchases and indemnification payments related to mortgages and increases in reserves associated therewith;
    • the loss of customers as a result of technological changes allowing consumers to complete their financial transactions without the use of a bank;
    • the soundness of other financial institutions and the impact of recent failures of financial institutions, including broader financial institution liquidity risk and concerns;
    • the expenses and delayed returns inherent in opening new branches and de novo banks;
    • liabilities, potential customer loss or reputational harm related to closings of existing branches;
    • examinations and challenges by tax authorities, and any unanticipated impact of the Tax Act;
    • changes in accounting standards, rules and interpretations, and the impact on the Company’s financial statements;
    • the ability of the Company to receive dividends from its subsidiaries;
    • the impact of the Company’s transition from LIBOR to an alternative benchmark rate for current and future transactions;
    • a decrease in the Company’s capital ratios, including as a result of declines in the value of its loan portfolios, or otherwise;
    • legislative or regulatory changes, particularly changes in regulation of financial services companies and/or the products and services offered by financial services companies;
    • changes in laws, regulations, rules, standards and contractual obligations regarding data privacy and cybersecurity;
    • a lowering of our credit rating;
    • changes in U.S. monetary policy and changes to the Federal Reserve’s balance sheet, including changes in response to persistent inflation or otherwise;
    • regulatory restrictions upon our ability to market our products to consumers and limitations on our ability to profitably operate our mortgage business;
    • increased costs of compliance, heightened regulatory capital requirements and other risks associated with changes in regulation and the regulatory environment;
    • the impact of heightened capital requirements;
    • increases in the Company’s FDIC insurance premiums, or the collection of special assessments by the FDIC;
    • delinquencies or fraud with respect to the Company’s premium finance business;
    • credit downgrades among commercial and life insurance providers that could negatively affect the value of collateral securing the Company’s premium finance loans;
    • the Company’s ability to comply with covenants under its credit facility;
    • fluctuations in the stock market, which may have an adverse impact on the Company’s wealth management business and brokerage operation; and
    • widespread outages of operational, communication, or other systems, whether internal or provided by third parties, natural or other disasters (including acts of terrorism, armed hostilities and pandemics), and the effects of climate change.

    Therefore, there can be no assurances that future actual results will correspond to these forward-looking statements. The reader is cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statement made by the Company. Any such statement speaks only as of the date the statement was made or as of such date that may be referenced within the statement. The Company undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect the impact of circumstances or events after the date of the press release. Persons are advised, however, to consult further disclosures management makes on related subjects in its reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and in its press releases.

    CONFERENCE CALL, WEBCAST AND REPLAY

    The Company will hold a conference call on Tuesday, April 22, 2025 at 9:00 a.m. (CDT) regarding first quarter 2025 earnings results. Individuals interested in participating in the call by addressing questions to management should register for the call to receive the dial-in numbers and unique PIN at the Conference Call Link included within the Company’s press release dated March 31, 2025 available at the Investor Relations, Investor News and Events, Press Releases link on its website at https://www.wintrust.com. A separate simultaneous audio-only webcast link is included within the press release referenced above. Registration for and a replay of the audio-only webcast with an accompanying slide presentation will be available at https://www.wintrust.com, Investor Relations, Investor News and Events, Presentations & Conference Calls. The text of the first quarter 2025 earnings press release will also be available on the home page of the Company’s website at https://www.wintrust.com and at the Investor Relations, Investor News and Events, Press Releases link on its website.

    FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT:
    Timothy S. Crane, President & Chief Executive Officer
    David A. Dykstra, Vice Chairman & Chief Operating Officer
    (847) 939-9000
    Web site address: www.wintrust.com

    The MIL Network –

    April 22, 2025
  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: UK to step up military partnership with New Zealand as both countries drive forward defence and security agenda

    Source: United Kingdom – Government Statements

    Press release

    UK to step up military partnership with New Zealand as both countries drive forward defence and security agenda

    The UK is set to deepen defence and security ties with New Zealand as the Prime Minster strengthens alliances abroad to protect Britain’s national interest.

    • Prime Minister Keir Starmer and New Zealand Prime Minister Christopher Luxon set to step up support for Ukraine with new drone contract and extension to Operation Interflex
    • Comes as leaders agree to deepen defence and security ties, with the Royal New Zealand Navy preparing to join the UK’s Carrier Strike Group as it heads to the Indo-Pacific
    • Leaders also expected to discuss the importance of growth and free trade for economic and national security

    The UK is set to deepen defence and security ties with New Zealand as the Prime Minster strengthens alliances abroad to protect Britain’s national interest.

    Prime Minister Keir Starmer will host New Zealand Prime Minister Christopher Luxon this morning, with the leaders visiting the training of Ukrainian forces by the UK and New Zealand military as part of Operation Interflex. The visit follows the two leaders meeting at the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting in Samoa last year.

    New Zealand trainers have worked alongside British counterparts to help train more than 54,000 soldiers on Operation Interflex, and New Zealand are expected to today confirm that they will extend their support for the initiative in the UK until the end of the year.

    In addition to their support for training Ukrainian troops, military planners from the New Zealand Defence Force are contributing to the latest thinking and plans for post-conflict support for Ukraine through the Coalition of the Willing.

    Prime Minister Starmer will also announce UK contracts worth £30m for drones produced by SYOS Aerospace, a New Zealand uncrewed vehicle manufacturer based in Hampshire to support Ukraine.

    The contract has created 45 jobs at the manufacturing facility based in Fareham, Hampshire, and supports a further nine UK based companies with subcontracts – delivering on the government’s Plan for Change through both growth and security.

    During the visit to see the training first hand, the leaders are expected to discuss plans to further step up defence and security cooperation, with defence ministers being instructed to work on a new joint defence partnership between both countries to ensure the relationship is fit for the twenty-first century.

    The new arrangement, which will succeed the one signed in 2015, comes after both the UK and New Zealand increased defence spending to 2.5% and 2% of GDP respectively. It will also recognise the vital partnership between the UK and New Zealand in upholding stability and security across Europe, the Middle East and the Indo-Pacific.

    That includes through the involvement of Royal New Zealand Navy frigate, HMNZS Te Kaha, which will join the UK Carrier Strike Group, which leaves Portsmouth today, in the Indian Ocean.

    Prime Minister Keir Starmer said:

    “Only by working with our friends and allies and protecting our national security will we be able to deliver on our Plan for Change, putting money back in the pockets of working people through highly skilled jobs – such as those we have announced today – a strong and resilient economy, and greater opportunity.

    “From the beaches of Gallipoli, to the vital work we have been doing together on Operation Interflex and our support for Ukraine, the UK and New Zealand have stood shoulder-to-shoulder for generations in pursuit of peace and stability.

    “As the world becomes an increasingly dangerous place, I am proud how much we are doing together to support our national and economic security – stepping up our defence spending, deploying our navies together in the Indo-Pacific, and continuing our work to put Ukraine in the strongest possible position to deter an increasingly aggressive Russia.”

    Following the visit to Interflex training in the South West of England, the leaders will return to Downing Street to discuss how both countries can work together to drive growth, deliver on the government’s Plan for Change, and put money back in the pockets of working people.

    That will include increasing ambition on free and open trade, including through the global Comprehensive and Progressive Trans-Pacific Partnership and New Zealand and the UK’s landmark Free Trade Agreement.

    Total trade in goods and services between the UK and New Zealand was £3.6 billion in 12 months to September 2024 an increase of 5.3%, or £179 million in current prices, from 12 months leading up to September 2023. 

    It comes after Scottish firm Emergency One won a global competition to supply emergency vehicles to Fire and Emergency New Zealand (FENZ). Through the ten-year contract, East Ayrshire based Emergency One will replace 186 vehicles for New Zealand’s first responders, supporting 25 new jobs in Scotland.

    The UK and New Zealand are also deepening collaboration in the agriculture technology sector. A new Investor Partnership deal will see New Zealand investment in British small and medium enterprises to develop cutting edge equipment supporting growth, farming sustainability and food security.

    Share this page

    The following links open in a new tab

    • Share on Facebook (opens in new tab)
    • Share on Twitter (opens in new tab)

    Updates to this page

    Published 21 April 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom –

    April 22, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Security: Maryland Attorney Pleads Guilty to Not Paying Employment Taxes

    Source: United States Attorneys General 1

    A Maryland attorney pleaded guilty today for not paying employment taxes withheld from the employees of his law firm.

    The following is according to court documents and statements made in court: James E. McCollum Jr. was an attorney licensed to practice law in Maryland and the District of Columbia. From 1998 to 2024, McCollum was the sole proprietor of a law firm based in College Park, Maryland, which he operated using a series of business names, including McCollum P.C.; McCollum & Associates LLC; and The McCollum Firm LLC. Nevertheless, McCollum was always the sole owner and operator of the business.

    As such, McCollum exercised financial control over the firm, including hiring and supervising employees, operating the payroll, and maintaining signature authority over the business bank accounts. From at least 2000 onward, McCollum was responsible for withholding Social Security, Medicare, and federal income taxes from his employees’ wages and paying those funds over to the government each quarter. McCollum was also obligated to pay over the employer’s share of Social Security and Medicare taxes.

    The timely payment of these taxes is critical to the functioning of the U.S. government, because, for example, they are the primary source of funding for Social Security and Medicare. The federal income taxes that are withheld from employees’ wages also account for a significant portion of all federal income taxes collected each year.

    Over the last 24 years, McCollum, however, was frequently not compliant with his obligations to pay these taxes to the government or to file the necessary tax returns.

    Beginning in 2010, the IRS attempted to collect the unpaid employment taxes, issuing numerous notices and levies to the law firm. When the IRS was unable to collect the outstanding taxes from the firm, it assessed them against McCollum personally and tried to collect them from him as well.

    In 2020, instead of paying the taxes that were due, McCollum sought to thwart the IRS’s ongoing collection efforts by transferring his business and its employees to a new entity, The McCollum Firm. Yet, even after the transfer, McCollum continued to not file the requisite tax returns or pay the employment taxes over. McCollum acknowledged that from 2000 through 2024, he did not pay over at least approximately $2,174,992.83 in employment taxes.

    McCollum also acknowledged that he did not file his own individual income tax returns and did not pay $220,515 in individual income taxes due for the tax years 2020 through 2022.

    The court scheduled sentencing for Sept. 29. McCollum faces a maximum penalty of five years in prison for the failure to pay over employment taxes. A federal district court judge will determine any sentence after considering the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and other statutory factors. McCollum also faces a period of supervised release, restitution, and monetary penalties.

    Acting Deputy Assistant Attorney General Karen E. Kelly of the Justice Department’s Tax Division made the announcement.

    IRS Criminal Investigation is investigating the case.

    Assistant Chief Jorge Almonte and Trial Attorney Mark McDonald of the Justice Department’s Tax Division are prosecuting the case.

    MIL Security OSI –

    April 22, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Security: Armed Repeat Offender Sentenced to 97 Months in Federal Prison for Drug and Gun Charges

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

    BOISE – Isaac Augustin Santoyo, 25, of Nampa, was sentenced to 97 months in federal prison for seven counts of distributing cocaine, one count of possession with intent to distribute cocaine, and one count of possession of a firearm in furtherance of drug trafficking crime, Acting U.S. Attorney Justin Whatcott announced today.  U.S. District Court Judge Amanda K. Brailsford also sentenced Santoyo to serve five years of supervised release upon completion of his prison sentence, pay a $9000 fine and pay a $900 special assessment.

    According to court records, Santoyo had previously been convicted of possession of cocaine with intent to deliver in Ada County in 2017.  When he completed probation for that offense, he continued to distribute cocaine in Canyon County.  From October 2023 through April 2024, Santoyo sold cocaine during controlled buys with law enforcement on seven different occasions, totaling 868 grams.  A search warrant was served on his residence, where law enforcement seized (and ultimately forfeited) $25,291, a semi-automatic handgun, and 174 grams of cocaine.  Santoyo pleaded guilty to all nine offenses on January 16, 2025.

    Acting U.S. Attorney Whatcott commended the work of the Drug Enforcement Administration, the Nampa Police Department, the Meridian Police Department, Idaho State Police, and Idaho Probation and Parole.

    ###

    MIL Security OSI –

    April 22, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: HARRISBURG – Governor Josh Shapiro and First Lady Lori Shapiro Welcome Guests Back to the Governor’s Residence to Celebrate Annual Easter Egg Hunt

    Source: US State of Pennsylvania

    April 22, 2025 – Harrisburg, PA

    ADVISORY – HARRISBURG – Governor Josh Shapiro and First Lady Lori Shapiro Welcome Guests Back to the Governor’s Residence to Celebrate Annual Easter Egg Hunt

    Governor Josh Shapiro, First Lady Lori Shapiro, Lieutenant Governor Austin Davis, and Second Lady Blayre Holmes Davis will welcome pre-K students from across the Commonwealth to Pennsylvania’s 2025 Annual Easter Egg Hunt at the Governor’s Residence. This event comes after Governor Shapiro made clear that he and the First Lady would be opening the Residence’s doors as quickly as possible.

    The Governor’s 2025-26 budget proposal makes significant investments in child care – including $55 million to give child care workers in Pennsylvania at least $1,000 in recruitment or retention bonuses and an additional $10 million to increase Early Intervention (EI) provider rates, to ensure every Pennsylvania child has the support and resources needed to succeed, regardless of family income. This budget also proposes an additional $15 million for the Pre-K Counts program to help providers raise wages and stabilize the early educator workforce.

    WHO:
    Governor Josh Shapiro
    First Lady Lori Shapiro
    Lieutenant Governor Austin Davis
    Second Lady Blayre Holmes Davis
    The Easter Bunny
    Pre-K for PA
    Pre-K Students

    WHEN:
    Tuesday, April 22, 2025 at 10:00AM
    *Press must enter through the Maclay Street entrance gate. Please be prepared to show credentials upon arrival.

    WHERE:
    Pennsylvania Governor’s Residence
    2035 North Front Street
    Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17102

    LIVE STREAM:
    pacast.com/live/gov
    governor.pa.gov/live/

    RSVP:
    Press who are interested in attending must RSVP with the names and phones numbers for each member of their team to ra-gvgovpress@pa.gov.

    MIL OSI USA News –

    April 22, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: VALUE LINE, INC. DIVIDEND HAS JUST BEEN RAISED FROM $1.20 TO $1.30 (ANNUALIZED) – ITS 11TH CONSECUTIVE INCREASE

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    New York, April 21, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Value Line, Inc. (NASDAQ – VALU) announced today that its Board of Directors has just raised its quarterly dividend, which will be $0.325 per common share ($1.30 annualized). The new higher cash dividend is payable on May 12, 2025 to stockholders of record on April 28, 2025. The increase of 8.3% is the 11th consecutive yearly increase in Value Line’s dividend.

    Value Line is a leading provider of investment research. The Value Line Investment Survey is one of the most widely used sources of independent equity research.

    Value Line publishes proprietary investment research in separate print and digital formats.

    Value Line provides these specialized services:
    a. Value Line Select – Each month, Value Line analysts recommend the one exceptional stock with superior profit potential and a favorable risk/reward ratio.
    b. The Value Line Special Situations Service – Each month, Value Line analysts recommend small and mid-cap stocks that hold the potential to transform your portfolio by delivering returns that are well above the market average.
    c. Value Line Select ETFs – Each month, Value Line analysts sift through the myriad investment possibilities to identify the one exchange traded fund that appears best positioned to outperform the market.
    d. Value Line Select: Dividend Income & Growth – Each month Value Line analysts make two stock recommendations that are expected to provide above-average current income along with appealing long-term dividend growth prospects.
    e. The New Value Line ETFs Service – includes data, information, and analysis on more than 2,800 exchange-traded funds (ETFs), to help subscribers select the best fit for their portfolios.
    f. The Value Line M&A Service – Value Line analysts highlight one company each month that is a candidate to be acquired by a larger entity at a material premium to the current stock price.
    g. Value Line Information You Should Know wealth newsletter – Value Line focuses on financial planning and investment issues that matter for today’s investor.
    h. The Value Line Climate Change Investing Service – Value Line analysts target a critical issue – climate change, which is expected to spur transformation in the global economy for decades to come
    i. Certain Value Line copyrights distributed under agreements including proprietary ranking system information and other information used in 3rd party products
    j. The Value Line Options Survey – information and ranks on more than 600,000 options on stocks covering 90% of the market.
    k. The Value Line Fund Adviser Plus – covers 20,000 funds, grouped into more than 30 Investment Objective Categories. Our proprietary Ranking System makes it simple to tell whether or not a particular fund is a worthwhile investment. Our approach helps to ensure that investors avoid funds with unsustainable short-term performance, and you can count on our Safety ™ rank to help manage your risk. Our professionally selected Model Portfolio names the best Exchange-Traded funds in eight key categories.
    l. The Value Line Investment Survey–Small& Mid Cap – print and digital financial information and quantitative analysis on approximately 1,800 companies with market capitalizations of less than $10 billion.
    m. The Value Line 600 – in-depth, independent print research on 600 large and prominent companies
    n. The Value Line Investment Survey–Selection & Opinion – Value Line’s weekly economic and stock market commentary, four Model Portfolios, which are actively managed, updated each week, and always contain 20 equities each.
    o. The Value Line Investment Survey–Smart Investor – a digital service providing investment research covering large, mid and small-cap stocks comprising about 90% of the total U.S. stock market
    p. The Value Line Investment Survey–Small Cap Investor – digital financial information and quantitative analysis on approximately 1,800 companies with market capitalizations of less than $10 billion
    q. The Value Line Investment Survey–Savvy Investor – a digital package covering more than 3,000 large, mid and small-cap stocks
    r. The Value Line Investment Survey–Investor 900 – this digital service provides investment research on 600 of the largest cap stocks plus 300 small- and mid-cap stocks
    s. The Value Line Investment Survey–Investor 600 – In-depth, independent digital research on 600 large and prominent companies
    t. The Value Line Investment Survey–Investor 2400 – This digital service provides investment research for 600 of the largest cap stocks plus approximately 1,800 small and mid-cap stocks
    u. The Value Line Investment Analyzer – This digital only service covers large, mid and small cap stocks comprising about 90% of the U.S. stock market
    v. Value Line Investment Analyzer Plus – a digital service that provides complete stock analysis for approximately 6,000 equities
    w. Value Line Research Center – A complete, online investment research system that includes all the financial information and tools needed to structure a well-researched and diversified portfolio for stocks, ETFs and mutual funds
    x. Value Line Equity Research Center – A complete, online investment research system that includes all of Value Line’s equity research products needed to structure a well-researched and diversified portfolio for equities

    Value Line’s products are available to individual investors by mail, at www.valueline.com or by calling 1-800-VALUELINE (1-800-825-8354).

    Institutional services for professional investors, advisors, corporate, academic, and municipal libraries are offered at www.ValueLinePro.com, www.ValueLineLibrary.com and by calling 1-800-531-1425.

    Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information
    In this report, “Value Line,” “we,” “us,” “our” refers to Value Line, Inc. and “the Company” refers to Value Line and its subsidiaries unless the context otherwise requires.

    This report contains statements that are predictive in nature, depend upon or refer to future events or conditions (including certain projections and business trends) accompanied by such phrases as “believe”, “estimate”, “expect”, “anticipate”, “will”, “intend” and other similar or negative expressions, that are “forward-looking statements” as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, as amended. Actual results for Value Line, Inc. (“Value Line” or “the Company”) may differ materially from those projected as a result of certain risks and uncertainties, including but not limited to the following:

    • maintaining revenue from subscriptions for the Company’s digital and print published products;
    • changes in investment trends and economic conditions, including global financial issues;
    • changes in Federal Reserve policies affecting interest rates and liquidity along with resulting effects on equity markets;
    • stability of the banking system, including the success of U.S. government policies and actions in regard to banks with liquidity or capital issues, along with the associated impact on equity markets;
    • continuation of orderly markets for equities and corporate and governmental debt securities;
    • problems protecting intellectual property rights in Company methods and trademarks;
    • problems protecting confidential information including customer confidential or personal information that we may possess;
    • dependence on non-voting revenues and non-voting profits interests in EULAV Asset Management, a Delaware statutory trust (“EAM” or “EAM Trust”), which serves as the investment advisor to the Value Line Funds and engages in related distribution, marketing and administrative services;
    • fluctuations in EAM’s and third-party copyright assets under management due to broadly based changes in the values of equity and debt securities, market sector variations, redemptions by investors and other factors;
    • possible changes in the valuation of EAM’s intangible assets from time to time;
    • possible changes in future revenues or collection of receivables from significant customers;
    • dependence on key executive and specialist personnel;
    • risks associated with the outsourcing of certain functions, technical facilities, and operations, including in some instances outside the U.S.;
    • risks of increased tariffs and other restrictions affecting the cost and availability of materials, equipment, and other necessary inputs to the Company’s operations;
    • competition in the fields of publishing, copyright and investment management, along with associated effects on the level and structure of prices and fees, and the mix of services delivered;
    • the impact of government regulation on the Company’s and EAM’s businesses;
    • federal and/or state legislative changes that might affect Value Line’s business;
    • the availability of free or low cost investment information through discount brokers or generally over the internet;
    • the economic and other impacts of global political and military conflicts;
    • continued availability of generally dependable energy supplies and transportation facilities in the geographic areas in which the company and certain suppliers operate;
    • terrorist attacks, cyber attacks and natural disasters;
    • the need for changes in our business plans because of unexpected events that occur;
    • widespread illnesses which may drastically affect markets, employment, and other economic conditions, and may have additional unpredictable impacts on employees, suppliers, customers, and operations;
    • changes in prices and availability of materials and other inputs and services, such as freight and postage, required by the Company;
    • risk of inadequacy of our insurance coverage to compensate for potential losses;
    • potential impact of vendors’ consolidation;
    • other risks and uncertainties, including but not limited to the risks described in Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors” of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended April 30, 2024 and in Part II, Item 1A of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended January 31, 2025; and other risks and uncertainties arising from time to time.

    These factors are not necessarily all of the important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in any of our forward-looking statements. Other unknown or unpredictable factors which may involve external factors over which we may have no control could also have material adverse effects on future results. Likewise, changes we make in our plans, objectives, strategies, or intentions, which may occur at any time in our discretion, could also have material favorable or adverse effects on our future results. Except as otherwise required to be disclosed in periodic reports required to be filed by public companies with the SEC pursuant to the SEC’s rules, we have no duty to update these statements, and we undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. In light of these risks and uncertainties, current plans, anticipated actions, and future financial conditions and results may differ from those expressed in any forward-looking information contained herein.

    Contact: Howard A. Brecher                                         
    Value Line, Inc.
    212-907-1500

    www.valueline.com
    www.ValueLinePro.com, www.ValueLineLibrary.com
    Facebook | LinkedIn | Twitter
    Complimentary Value Line® Reports on Dow 30 Stocks

    The MIL Network –

    April 22, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: U.S. Attorneys for Southwestern Border Districts Charge More than 1,220 Illegal Aliens with Immigration-Related Crimes During the Third week in April as part of Operation Take Back America.

    Source: US Justice – Antitrust Division

    Headline: U.S. Attorneys for Southwestern Border Districts Charge More than 1,220 Illegal Aliens with Immigration-Related Crimes During the Third week in April as part of Operation Take Back America.

    Since the inauguration of President Trump, the Department of Justice is playing a critical role in Operation Take back America, a nationwide initiative to repel the invasion of illegal immigration, achieve total elimination of cartels and transnational criminal organizations (TCOs), and protect our communities from perpetrators of violent crime. Operation Take Back America streamlines efforts and resources from the Department’s Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Forces (OCDETFs) and Project Safe Neighborhood (PSN).

    MIL OSI USA News –

    April 22, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: PRESS RELEASE: President Pro Tempore John F. Kennedy Applauds Signing of Comprehensive Tort Reform Legislation

    Source: US State of Georgia

    ATLANTA (April 21, 2025)—Today, Governor Brian P. Kemp officially signed Senate Bills 68 and 69 into law, marking a major step forward in Georgia’s ongoing effort to balance our civil justice system and protect Georgians from abusive litigation practices. President Pro Tempore John F. Kennedy (R–Macon) carried the bills in the Senate on behalf of Governor Kemp, who named tort reform his top legislative priority for the 2025 session.

    SB 68 enacts sweeping reforms to Georgia’s tort laws, including changes to negligent security liability, apportionment of fault, and damages in civil cases. Designed to protect small businesses and consumers from the burden of frivolous lawsuits, SB 68 aims to create a fairer and more balanced civil justice environment that will benefit consumers and job creators alike.

    “Our goal as legislators is to preserve the well-being of Georgians everywhere, including small businesses, health care providers and working families,” said Sen. Kennedy. “SB 68 cracks down on excessive and frivolous litigation to ensure that our legal system works for those who play by the rules, not those looking to exploit it. Curbing lawsuit abuse is strong step in the right direction. These reforms will bring stability to small businesses and job creators across our state.”

    SB 69, the Georgia Courts Access and Consumer Protection Act, complements SB 68 by addressing the growing influence of Third-Party Litigation Financing (TPLF). The new law requires TPLF entities to register with the state, bans foreign-affiliated financiers from operating in Georgia, and opens registration records to the public for greater transparency and accountability.

    “Alongside SB 68, SB 69 specifically cracks down on predatory litigation financers who seek to take advantage of unwary Georgia consumers,” said Sen. Kennedy. “This billion-dollar industry, often backed by foreign actors, has no place in our civil justice system. With this legislation, we are upholding the integrity of Georgia’s courts and strengthening consumer protections statewide. I am thankful for the support of Governor Kemp and my Senate colleagues as we worked this session to get these measures across the finish line.”

    Together, Senate Bills 68 and 69 reinforce Georgia’s status as the No. 1 state for business by establishing a more predictable, transparent and fair legal environment. Both bills received strong support from stakeholders across Georgia’s business and legal communities and represent a critical victory in the ongoing effort to make the state’s economy more resilient and competitive.

    For more information about Senate Bill 68, click here. For more information about Senate Bill 69, click here.

    # # # #

    Sen. John F. Kennedy serves as the President Pro Tempore of the Georgia State Senate. He represents the 18th Senate District, which includes Crawford, Monroe, Peach and Upson counties, as well as portions of Bibb and Houston counties. He may be reached at (404) 656-6578 or by email at John.Kennedy@senate.ga.gov.

    For all media inquiries, please reach out to SenatePressInquiries@senate.ga.gov.

    MIL OSI USA News –

    April 22, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Flags Directed to Half Staff to Honor His Holiness Pope Francis

    Source: US State of New York

    overnor Kathy Hochul today directed flags to be lowered at half staff to honor the life and legacy of His Holiness Pope Francis, who passed away today at the age of 88.

    “I join everyone around the world in mourning the loss of His Holiness Pope Francis, as his leadership transcended religious boundaries,” Governor Hochul said. “He embodied the values Christ taught us every day: helping the less fortunate, calling for peace, and ensuring every person is treated as a child of God. Pope Francis led with compassion, humility and inclusivity, emphasizing that God does not disown any of his children, and reminded us of our collective responsibility to protect this beautiful planet, our shared home. We should all strive to carry on his legacy.”

    Last year, Governor Hochul visited the Vatican to deliver remarks at a Pontifical Summit to discuss climate change where Pope Francis delivered an address calling on the world to take care of the most vulnerable in our society.

    Flags will be lowered from Monday, April 21 through the day of his funeral service.

    MIL OSI USA News –

    April 22, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Promoting Work Zone Safety Statewide

    Source: US State of New York

    overnor Kathy Hochul is promoting work zone safety by urging all drivers to slow down, stay alert and follow New York State’s Move Over Law to protect roadside workers and other motorists. As construction season kicks into high gear statewide, these efforts highlight National Work Zone Awareness Week — which is celebrated from April 21-25, 2025 — and the national theme: “Respect the zone so we all get home.”

    “Every roadside worker deserves to return home safely at the end of their shift,” Governor Hochul said. “We’re asking all drivers to do their part by reducing speed, eliminating distractions and staying vigilant in work zones so that our hard-working and dedicated roadside workers are safe. A few extra seconds of your time and attention can save a life.”

    In 2024, there were more than 156 crashes in Thruway work zones resulting in one fatality and 30 injuries. Distracted driving, following too closely, an unsafe lane change or disregarding traffic warning signs caused the majority of the crashes. In addition, two Thruway Authority employees died and another was seriously injured in separate incidents while working on the New York State Thruway. In its 70-plus year history, 22 Thruway employees have been killed while on the job.

    In 2024, there were 322 intrusions in New York State Department of Transportation (NYSDOT) work zones. These intrusions resulted in the deaths of two drivers who entered the work zones and 138 additional injuries to highway workers and the traveling public. A total of 58 members of the NYSDOT family have died on the job across New York State, dating as far back as 1939.

    Throughout National Work Zone Awareness Week, the New York State Thruway Authority and NYSDOT will be hosting awareness events, lighting digital highway signs with safety messages and sharing important safety reminders on social media platforms. In addition — at the direction of Governor Hochul — State landmarks will be illuminated in orange on Wednesday, April 23 in recognition of Go Orange Day. Drivers are encouraged to:

    • Slow down when approaching work zones.
    • Move over for all stopped vehicles including roadside workers, emergency responders and disabled vehicles.
    • Stay off phones and avoid other distractions while driving.
    • Follow posted signs and flagger instructions.

    This April also marks two years since the launch of the Automated Work Zone Speed Enforcement (AWZSE) pilot program. The pilot program was established by legislation enacted into law by Governor Hochul in 2021 which authorized a five-year pilot program run as a joint effort by NYSDOT and the Thruway Authority to enhance the State’s ongoing efforts to slow motorists down in work zones and make New York’s highways safer.

    More than 425,000 Notices of Liability have been issued statewide, with over 38,000 repeat offenders since the AWZSE program began issuing Notices of Liability in May 2023. In locations where the cameras have been present more than once, fewer Notices of Liability are being issued, meaning that people are slowing down when cameras are present.

    Fines through the pilot program are issued as follows:

    • First Notice of Liability: $50 fine
    • Second Notice of Liability: $75 fine if within an 18-month period of first violation
    • Third and Subsequent Notices of Liability: $100 fine if within an 18-month period of first violation

    To further protect the workers who build and maintain roads and bridges, Governor Hochul proposed making the AWZSE pilot program permanent and increasing penalties for repeat violators in her Fiscal Year 2026 Executive Budget, in addition to expanding the program to include Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) Bridges and Tunnels and New York State Bridge Authority properties. Additionally, the Governor suggested enhancing penalties for assaults against transportation workers, extending protections similar to those provided to many MTA and retail workers. These actions will improve safety for both workers and drivers.

    Beginning with National Work Zone Awareness Week and continuing through the construction season, the New York State Police and local law enforcement agencies will once again be conducting “Operation Hardhat” details to enforce vehicle and traffic laws in highway work zones. Under “Operation Hardhat,” State Troopers or local police officers are dressed as highway maintenance workers in active NYSDOT or Thruway work zones across New York, identifying and citing motorists for several violations, including disobeying flagging personnel, speeding through work zones, cell phone and seatbelt use, and/or violations of the State’s Move Over law. Last year 2,755 tickets were issued by State Police and participating law enforcement agencies during 62 deployments across the State.

    The New York State Department of Transportation and Thruway Authority have produced new videos encouraging motorists to move over in work zones. See the NYSDOT video here and Thruway Authority video here.

    To celebrate “Go Orange Day” and to commemorate National Work Zone Awareness Week, the following New York State landmarks will be lit orange on Wednesday, April 23:

    • Governor Mario M. Cuomo Bridge
    • Kosciuszko Bridge
    • The H. Carl McCall SUNY Building
    • State Education Building
    • Alfred E. Smith State Office Building
    • Empire State Plaza
    • State Fairgrounds – Main Gate & Expo Center
    • Niagara Falls
    • The “Franklin D. Roosevelt” Mid-Hudson Bridge
    • Albany International Airport Gateway
    • MTA LIRR – East End Gateway at Penn Station
    • Fairport Lift Bridge over the Erie Canal
    • Moynihan Train Hall

    The New York State Bridge Authority (NYSBA) is observing Work Zone Awareness Week by conducting a “road show” at each of its five vehicular spans. Each day will consist of a meeting with staff, followed by a meeting with local stakeholders and first responders to discuss safety concerns, explore opportunities for collaboration, and share information about NYSBA’s upcoming construction season. Additionally, the necklace lights on the Mid-Hudson Bridge will be illuminated in orange in honor of “Go Orange Day” to promote work zone safety.

    New York State Thruway Authority Executive Director Frank G. Hoare said, “Each day, roadside workers risk their lives to enhance the safety of the roads we all rely on. It’s everyone’s responsibility to ensure they can perform their jobs safely and return to their families after their shifts. Drivers need to remain alert and reduce their speed in work zones. Let’s show our appreciation for the dedicated men and women who keep our roads operating safely.”

    New York State Department of Transportation Commissioner Marie Therese Dominguez said, “Our dedicated highway maintenance and construction workers routinely work in hazardous conditions so that the rest of us can get where we need to go, safely. They have families, friends and loved ones who love them and depend on them. We owe them all a debt of gratitude and paying back that debt begins with keeping them safe. I appreciate Governor Hochul’s continuing efforts to protect our workers so remember, every driver has a role to play — during National Work Zone Awareness Week and throughout the year – that is why I urge all motorists to put down your phones, slow down, and pay attention, especially in work zones. Lives are at stake.”

    New York State Bridge Authority Executive Director Dr. Minosca Alcantara said, “This week serves as an important reminder that work zone safety is a shared responsibility for everyone who travels on our state’s roadways. In recognition of this, the Bridge Authority is bringing together staff and local leaders at each of our five vehicular bridges to reinforce our partnerships and collective commitment to protecting employees working in construction zones. By remaining vigilant and looking out for our work crews, we help ensure that our staff return home safely to their loved ones—and that all travelers experience a safer journey.”

    New York State Police Superintendent Steven G. James said, “Highway workers, law enforcement officers and other emergency responders, work in a dangerous environment and risk their lives to keep the traveling public safe. They should be able to do their jobs without fear of harm and go home to their families at the end of each workday. It is important that motorists are aware of their responsibility to slow down, move over and put electronic devices away.”

    New York State Department of Motor Vehicles Commissioner and Chair of the Governor’s Traffic Safety Committee Mark J.F. Schroeder said, “As someone who spends a lot of time on the road driving across New York, I cannot understate my appreciation for the men and women who work to maintain the safety of those roads. We must all mind the rules of the road, and especially the rules of the work zone, to ensure that everyone on both sides of the cones and barricades are safe at all times.”

    State Senator Jeremy Cooney said, “This National Work Zone Awareness Week is a reminder for drivers to slow down, drive safely, and obey the rules of the road. Our highway employees work hard every day to improve our roads and get drivers where they need to go, and it’s only right that we work to keep them safe while on the job. I’m grateful to Governor Hochul, the Thruway Authority and NYSDOT for their continued partnership to keep all New Yorkers safe on the road.”

    Assemblymember William B. Magnarelli said, “Work Zone safety continues to be a priority for me as Chair of the Transportation Committee. In 2021, I was proud to sponsor and get passed into law legislation creating a pilot program for the use of speed cameras in work zones. There is no excuse for speeding and reckless driving in work zones. Our workers deserve a safe working environment and to safely go home to their families at the end of their shifts.”

    Associated General Contractors of New York State President and CEO Mike Elmendorf said, “Work zone safety isn’t just a one-week concern—it’s a year-round priority. As construction season ramps up, we urge all drivers: stay alert, slow down, and move over in work zones. Every day, highway workers and flaggers face serious risks from speeding and distracted drivers. That’s why New York’s work zone speed camera program is critical — it saves lives and must be made permanent and expanded. The recent rise in assaults on transportation workers makes it even more urgent to strengthen legal protections for those building and maintaining our infrastructure. AGC NYS is proud to partner with Governor Hochul and NYSDOT to create safer roads for workers and drivers alike. We applaud the Governor’s Executive Budget proposals to make the speed camera program permanent and close legal loopholes that leave workers vulnerable. Now, the Legislature must act to protect the men and women who keep New York moving.”

    New York State American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations President Mario Cliento said, “In just a few days, we will mark Workers Memorial Day to honor those who lost their lives on the job. As leaders move closer to finalizing the state budget, we have a unique opportunity to improve worker safety with new work zone protections and traffic laws. No worker should fear for their life while performing their job, and no family should have to grieve the loss of a loved one due to preventable and entirely avoidable roadway incidents. We thank Governor Hochul for prioritizing worker safety, and we look forward to working with her on protecting the workforce that keeps our roads safe.”

    New York State Building and Construction Trades Council President Gary LaBarbera said, “Construction sites are inherently dangerous and the added hazards and less-controllable variants of roadways and high speed traffic only increase the risks for worksites on our highways. This is why we must continue to encourage drivers to proceed with more caution and mindfulness around roadway work zones. We applaud Governor Hochul for her ongoing leadership and action on this important issue. Every hard-working New Yorker, including our brave tradesmen and tradeswomen working on our roadways, deserve to return home safely to their families at the end of each shift.”

    Laborers’ International Union of North America Vice President and New England Regional Manager Donato A. Bianco, Jr. said, “National Work Zone Awareness Week serves as an important reminder to everyone traveling our highways to slow down, stay alert and respect the men and women who perform this necessary and inherently dangerous work. Every day, LIUNA members build, repair and maintain the roads we drive to our jobs and back home to our families. It is because of these workers that our commutes are safer and more efficient. We all owe it to them to prioritize their safety and ensure they also return home to their loved ones at the end of their workday.”

    New York State Laborers Health and Safety Trust Fund Executive Director Frank Marchese, Jr. said, “National Work Zone Awareness Week is an important initiative that calls attention to the perils of road construction, and why driver attentiveness is imperative all year round. The data shows that prioritizing work zone safety legislation and initiatives creates a far less hazardous environment for workers simply doing their jobs by reducing speeding and distracted driving. Our union calls on everyone to do their part to keep workers safe, and show support for those who keep New York State moving forward.”

    New York State Conference of Operating Engineers President Thomas A. Callahan said, “Our members work hard building and repairing New York’s roads and bridges. That dangerous work becomes deadly with reckless and careless drivers. That’s why we urge the Legislature and the Governor to pass a budget that includes speed cameras in work zones legislation in addition to other safety measures.”

    Civil Service Employees Association Thruway Local 058 President Sean Kennedy said, “CSEA affirms our commitment to making sure all of our members make it home at the end of the work day. Drivers need to do their part too.”

    Civil Service Employees Association President Mary E. Sullivan said, “Our union joins Governor Hochul, the New York State Department of Transportation and the New York State Thruway Authority in observing National Work Zone Awareness Week from April 21 to April 25. As road work season begins, we want to once again highlight the importance of safe driving in highway work zones. This year, we observe this week remembering our union brother Stephen Ebling, who lost his life while working in a Thruway work zone. As motorists, we must always use caution while in work zones; respect the zone so we can all get home.”

    New York State Public Employees Federation President Wayne Spence said, “The 54,000 members of the New York State Public Employees Federation, especially the hardworking professionals at the NYS Department of Transportation, urge all New Yorkers to stay aware, on task and use caution when driving through highway work zones. As we enter National Work Zone Awareness Week, April 21-25, 2025, all New Yorkers should all be mindful that our highway workers have families that need them. In 2024 alone, there were more than 156 crashes in Thruway work zones resulting in one fatality and 30 injuries. Unfortunately, the vast majority of these accidents were entirely preventable if the drivers had focused on operating their vehicles and maintained appropriate work zone speeds — distracted driving and operator error were responsible for the vast majority of these crashes. PEF urges all motorists to pay attention and respect our highway work zones so all these dedicated workers can get home safely to their families.”

    Teamsters Local 456 President and Principal Officer Louis A. Picani said, “National Work Zone Awareness Week is a crucial time to reflect on the safety of our workers and the public. One of Teamsters Local 456’s objectives is to maintain the safety and well-being of our members. We support our partners in state government in enforcing stringent safety measures to protect those who build and maintain our roads. Local 456 not only represents the New York State Thruway workers, whose lives are in danger every day, but also the construction workers who are out fixing and maintaining roadways for those who travel them every day. We extend our heartfelt thanks to Governor Hochul for her unwavering support and commitment to enhancing work zone safety. Together, we can ensure that every work zone is a safe zone.”

    Safety is a shared responsibility. By working together, we can reduce accidents and ensure safer roads for workers and drivers alike.

    For more information on National Work Zone Awareness Week and how to stay safe while driving through work zones, visit the state’s comprehensive website at ny.gov/workzone.

    MIL OSI USA News –

    April 22, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Security: Former DOC Case Manager Pleads Guilty to Bribery in Smuggling Narcotics and Cigarettes for an Inmate

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

    WASHINGTON – Herbert Baylor, 68, of the District, pleaded guilty today in U.S. District Court to one count of bribery in connection with a cigarettes and narcotics smuggling scheme at a facility operated by the District of Columbia Department of Corrections (DOC).

                The plea was announced by U.S. Attorney Edward R. Martin Jr., Special Agent in Charge Sean Ryan of the FBI Washington Field Office Criminal and Cyber Division, and Chief Investigator Kevin L. Hammond of the D.C. Department of Corrections Office of Investigative Services.

                The Honorable Tanya Chutkan scheduled sentencing for Aug. 11, 2025.

                A co-defendant, Pamela Porter, 56, of Washington D.C., pleaded guilty on April 17, 2025, to bribery in connection to her participation in the smuggling scheme.

                According to court documents, Baylor was a case manager employed by DOC to assist and manage inmates housed at the Correctional Treatment Facility (CTF), a specialized medium security facility that houses inmates receiving specialized medical treatment or monitoring related to substance dependencies. 

                From December 19, 2022, through September 23, 2024, Baylor’s duties included helping with the administrative pre-trial and trial needs of inmates, including facilitating communication with their attorneys or social workers.

                Baylor worked as Inmate-1’s case worker at CTF. Beginning in October 2023, Baylor agreed with Inmate-1 and others to smuggle contraband into CTF in exchange for money. Specifically, Inmate-1 directed his non-incarcerated associates, including Pamela Porter, to send CashApp payments to Baylor. Baylor then hid on himself cigarettes he had purchased or controlled substances received from Inmate-1’s associates, in order to clear security at CTF. Once through security, Baylor brought Inmate-1 to his office and provided him with the contraband. Inmate-1 then distributed the contraband to other inmates at CTF in exchange for money. As part of this scheme, Porter sent Baylor $1,200. In total, Baylor received $6,245 between October 20, 2023, and June 21, 2024.

                On September 19, 2024, Inmate-1 asked Baylor if Inmate-1 could call his attorney to talk about an appeal. Baylor authorized the inmate’s request. But instead of calling an attorney, Inmate-1 called Individual-1 to set up the delivery of prohibited objects to be smuggled into CTF. Baylor agreed to smuggle Suboxone strips into the CTF facility for Inmate-1. Suboxone strips contain Buprenorphine—a Schedule III narcotic drug.

                On September 23, 2024, Baylor met Individual-1 in the parking lot of CTF. Baylor accepted $1,000 in cash from Individual-1 and received a cigarette carton Baylor believed to be filled with Suboxone strips. Following the meeting with Individual-1, Baylor placed the $1,000 in his personal vehicle. He put the cigarette carton inside his underwear. Baylor went through security at the entrance to CTF and entered the facility. At that time, he was arrested.

                As a DOC employee, Baylor’s conduct was governed by the DOC’s Contraband Control policy which states that trafficking contraband of any kind to inmates is strictly prohibited. The policy describes any illegal drug or controlled substance and any tobacco product as major contraband. Additionally, federal law makes it a crime to provide “prohibited objects” to an inmate. Prohibited objects include any controlled substance or any object that threatens “the order, discipline, or security of a prison, or the life, health, or safety of any individual.”

                This case was investigated by the FBI’s Washington Field Office and the D.C. Department of Corrections Office of Investigative Services. It is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Joshua Gold.

    25cr87

    ##

    MIL Security OSI –

    April 22, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Security: Miami Executive Pleads Guilty to Massive Fraud Scheme

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

    Earlier today, in federal court in Brooklyn, Pushpesh Kumar Baid, also known as “PK Jain,” pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit wire fraud in connection with a scheme to defraud investors in Tradepay Capital LLC (Tradepay), a purported factoring company.  The proceeding was held before United States Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom.  When sentenced, Baid faces a maximum sentence of 20 years’ imprisonment, as well as restitution of over $35 million and forfeiture of over $2.6 million.

    John J. Durham, United States Attorney for the Eastern District of New York, and Christopher G. Raia, Assistant Director in Charge, Federal Bureau of Investigation, New York Field Office (FBI), announced the guilty plea.

    “Through a complex web of shell companies, straw bank accounts, fraudulent documents, and other lies, Baid and his co-conspirators deceived their victims into investing tens of millions of dollars into a business that did not exist,” stated United States Attorney Durham.  “Today’s plea demonstrates that my Office will hold accountable fraudsters like Baid who enrich themselves at their investors’ expense.”   

    Mr. Durham expressed his appreciation to the Internal Revenue Service, Criminal Investigations for its work on the case.

    As set forth in court filings, Baid was the business head of Tradepay, which purported to be an international factoring business run by an executive team experienced in factoring invoices in particular industries and geographic regions.  Factoring involves the sale of an invoice to a third party at a discount.  In a factoring transaction, the seller of an invoice obtains immediate funding from the buyer of the invoice, and the buyer of the invoice makes a profit when the invoice is paid in full.

    Between April 2017 and October 2019, Baid and his co-conspirators implemented a scheme to defraud investors in Tradepay by making it appear that Tradepay was a legitimate and successful business when it was, in fact, an elaborate scam.  For example, the hundreds of invoices from various businesses that Tradepay purported to be factoring were fraudulent and included fake signatures for both sides of the transactions.  Baid and his co-conspirators also funneled millions of dollars of investors’ funds—which they represented would be sent to Tradepay’s business partners—into a sprawling network of bank accounts that Baid controlled through shell entities and straw signatories.  From those accounts, Baid and his co-conspirators spent millions of dollars on personal expenses, including cash withdrawals and purchases of luxury cars and watches.  Baid even lied about his identity, concealing his real name from investors in order to obscure the fact that he was wanted for criminal offenses abroad.

    Investors in Tradepay initially received payments on the invoices, which led them to contribute increasingly large sums of capital.  By approximately July 2019, however, the payments on the invoices stopped, resulting in roughly $35 million in losses.

    As part of his plea, Baid also admitted to defrauding investors in Luxestreet Inc., formerly known as Asset Capital Partners LLC (Luxestreet), and agreed to pay restitution to Luxestreet’s investors.  Baid claimed that Luxestreet operated like a pawn shop for high end goods, including luxury watches.  In reality, Luxestreet contracts were forged and the physical watches held by the company were mere knockoffs.  

    The government’s case is being handled by the Office’s Business and Securities Fraud Section.  Assistant United States Attorneys Dylan A. Stern, Benjamin Weintraub, and Molly Delaney are in charge of the prosecution, with assistance from Paralegal Specialist Sarah Burn.

    The Defendant:

    Pushpesh Kumar Baid (also known as “PK Jain”)
    Age:  44
    Miami, Florida

    E.D.N.Y. Docket No. 21-CR-367 (DC)

    MIL Security OSI –

    April 22, 2025
  • MIL-Evening Report: Fossil fuel companies ‘poisoned the well’ of public debate with climate disinformation. Here’s how Australia can break free

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Naomi Oreskes, Professor of the History of Science, Harvard University

    President Donald Trump has issued an executive order that would block state laws seeking to tackle greenhouse gas emissions – the latest salvo in his administration’s campaign to roll back United States’ climate action.

    Under Trump, the US has clearly abdicated climate leadership. But the US has in fact obstructed climate action for decades – largely due to damaging actions by the powerful fossil fuel industry.

    In 20 years studying attacks on climate science and the powerful forces at work behind the scenes, I’ve come to think the United States is simply not going to lead on climate action. The fossil fuel industry has so poisoned the well of public debate in the US that it’s unlikely the nation will lead on the issue in our lifetimes.

    Australia, on the other hand, has enormous potential.

    I recently visited Australia from Harvard University for a series of public talks. This nation is very close to my heart. I trained as a mining geologist and spent three years in outback South Australia, before returning to academia.

    The vacuum Trump has created on climate policy provides a chance for other countries to lead. Australia has much more to gain from the clean-energy future than it stands to lose – and your climate action could be pivotal.

    The climate crisis: a long time coming

    Scientists first warned against burning fossil fuels way back in the 1950s. When the US Clean Air Act was passed in 1970, the words “weather” and “climate” were included because scientists had already explained to Congress that carbon dioxide was a pollutant with serious — even dire — effects.

    In the late 1980s, scientists at NASA observed changes in the climate system that could only be explained by the extra heating effect of atmospheric carbon dioxide. The predictions had become reality.

    When George H.W. Bush ran successfully for president in 1988, he promised to use the power of the “White House effect” to fight the “greenhouse effect”. In 1992, Bush and other world leaders gathered in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, to sign the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Together, 178 countries promised action to prevent “dangerous anthropogenic interference” with Earth’s climate. But that action never came.

    Trump has undoubtedly been bad news for global climate action. He makes preposterous claims about science and is dismantling the federal agencies responsible for supporting climate science and maintaining climate data.

    But the US has long failed to play its part in cutting dangerous greenhouse gas emissions. The reason for this lies largely outside the White House.

    If only George H.W. Bush had used the White House effect to counter the greenhouse effect, as he once promised to.
    mark reinstein, Shutterstock

    A long-running campaign of disinformation

    The fossil fuel industry has known about climate change for as long as scientists have.

    In the late 1970s and early 1980s, scientists at Esso (later ExxonMobil) actively researched the topic, building climate models and coauthoring scientific papers.

    The scientists informed their managers of the risk of catastrophic damage if the burning of oil, gas and coal continued unabated. They even suggested the company might need a different business model – one not so dependent on fossil fuels.

    But managers at ExxonMobil made a fateful decision: to turn from information to disinformation. Working in tandem with other oil, gas and coal companies, as well as automobile and aluminium manufacturers, ExxonMobil launched an organised campaign, sustained over decades, to block climate action by casting doubt on the underlying science.

    They ran ad campaigns in national and local newspapers insisting the science was too unsettled to warrant action. They created “astroturf” organisations that only pretended to be green, and funded “third-party allies” to argue that proposed remedies would be too expensive, cost jobs and damage the economy.

    The company funded outlier scientists to publish papers claiming atmospheric warming was the result of natural climate variability. They pressured journalists to give equal time to “their side” of the story in the name of “balance”.

    Over the next three decades, whenever any meaningful climate policy seemed to be gaining traction, the industry and its allies lobbied Congress and state legislatures to block it. So, neither Democratic nor Republican administrations were able to undertake meaningful climate action.

    While people were dying in climate-charged floods and fires, the fossil fuel industry persuaded a significant proportion of the US population, including Trump, that the whole thing might just be a hoax.

    Rise up Australia

    In a matter of weeks after becoming president, Trump pulled out of the Paris Agreement to limit global warming, shut down government websites hosting climate data, and withdrew support for research that dares to mention the word “climate”.

    This has created a vacuum that other countries, including Australia, can step up to fill.

    Few countries have more to lose from climate change than Australia. The continent has already witnessed costly and devastating wildfires and floods — affecting remote areas and major cities. It’s not unreasonable to worry that in coming years, significant parts of Australia could become uninhabitable.

    Like the US, Australia has a powerful fossil fuel industry that has disproportionately influenced its politics. Unlike the US, however, that industry is based mainly on coal for export, which Australians do not depend on in their daily lives.

    And Australia is truly a lucky country. It has unsurpassed potential to replace fossil fuels with renewable energy.

    More than 15 years ago, Australian researchers in the Zero Carbon Australia project offered a blueprint for how the country could eliminate fossil fuel use entirely. Since then, renewable energy has only become cheaper and more efficient.

    South Australia has proved the point: the state was 100% reliant on fossil fuels for electricity in 2002, but now more than 70% comes from renewables.

    Across Australia, the share of renewable electricity generation is growing. Victoria, New South Wales and Queensland are vying for second place after SA. It’s fascinating to watch the National Electricity Market balance supply and demand in real time, where a large proportion of the electricity comes from rooftop solar.

    For decades, the fossil fuel industry has told the public our societies can’t manage without fossil fuels. Large parts of Australia have proved it’s just not so. The rest of the nation can follow that lead, and model the energy transition for the world. Here’s your chance.

    Over the past two decades, Naomi Oreskes has received grant funding from various governments and non-government organisations to support the research upon which this piece is based. She serves on the board of The Climate Science Legal Defense Fund, which works to protect the integrity of climate science, and climate scientists, from politically motivated attacks. The Fund is a registered 501 c(3) non-profit organisation, meaning it does not engage in political activities. She is also an emerita board member of Protect our Winters, a 501 c (3) that works with the winter sports community to educate people about climate change and the threat it poses to winter sports. Naomi serves on the board of the Kann-Rasmussen foundation (Denmark), a non-profit foundation that works “to support the transition to a more environmentally resilient stable, and sustainable planet”.
    Naomi currently serves as a consultant to a number of groups pursuing climate litigation in the United States, and recently submitted an expert report to the International Court of Justice on behalf of Vanuatu. She also receives speaking fees and book royalties for talks and publications on the history of climate science and climate change denial. Co-author, with Erik M. Conway, of Merchants of Doubt (2010) and The Big Myth (2023).

    – ref. Fossil fuel companies ‘poisoned the well’ of public debate with climate disinformation. Here’s how Australia can break free – https://theconversation.com/fossil-fuel-companies-poisoned-the-well-of-public-debate-with-climate-disinformation-heres-how-australia-can-break-free-251221

    MIL OSI Analysis – EveningReport.nz –

    April 22, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Senator Murray Demands Answers from Secretary Collins Over VA’s Unprecedented Refusal to Allow VA Puget Sound to Participate in Women Veterans Roundtable This Week

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Washington State Patty Murray

    Senator Murray in letter to Secretary Collins: “Over the thirty years I have represented Washington state, VA has approved and hosted countless outreach events with me… I was surprised and dismayed to find out this month that my office had been suddenly denied permission to hold a roundtable for women veterans to be able to talk about their own health care experiences, and concerns related to continued access to services.”

    Washington, D.C. — Today, U.S. Senator Patty Murray (D-WA), Vice Chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee and a senior member and former Chair of the Senate Veterans’ Affairs Committee, sent a letter to U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Secretary Doug Collins expressing concern and dismay over the unprecedented refusal—with no justification—by VA to allow VA Puget Sound to participate in a roundtable discussion Senator Murray is holding in Seattle tomorrow on women veterans’ health care. In the hearing on his nomination to lead VA and in his meeting with Senator Murray ahead of the Senate vote on his nomination, Doug Collins promised to be transparent with Congress if confirmed.

    “Throughout my time in Congress, under both Republican and Democratic administrations, I have been able to have open and honest conversations with VA and engage with my veteran constituents in Washington state,” Senator Murray wrote in her letter to Secretary Collins. “However, this administration has proven to be vastly different—VA is now providing little to no information in response to congressional inquiries and VA providers are being prevented from getting the opportunity to hear directly from veterans about their health care experience.”

    Murray continued, “VA has approved and hosted countless outreach events with me, including roundtables, on VA property to talk about everything from the implementation of the PACT Act to VA’s advancements in prosthetics care. All these events have been compliant with the Hatch Act.  So, I was surprised and dismayed to find out this month that my office had been suddenly denied permission to hold a roundtable for women veterans to be able to talk about their own health care experiences, and concerns related to continued access to services. Furthermore, the VA provided no rationale to justify this denial.”

    “This roundtable was designed to give providers, women veterans, and VA staff a chance to come together, in a space they all know and trust, to talk about the current state of women’s health care and ensure an ongoing conversation on the importance of prioritizing gender-specific health care services at VA… We owe women veterans the opportunity to have a say in how VA can best deliver their health care to them—and VA Puget Sound has a robust women’s health program that is worth showcasing,” Murray wrote. “From the abrupt mass firing of tens of thousands of VA employees, to the refusal to meaningfully engage with Congress, I am left to conclude that this administration is committed to putting up barriers that only make it harder for women veterans—and all veterans—to receive the care they deserve.”

    Senator Murray concluded by requesting answers to the following questions by May 16th, noting her concern with VA’s lack of transparency on the decision to deny her request to host a women veterans’ roundtable at VA Puget Sound, and growing concern with VA politicizing constituent services and congressional oversight:

    1. Plainly, why was the request refused?
    2. At what level was the request refused –VISN, VHA headquarters, or by VA central office political leadership?
    3. Was VA’s refusal based in any way due to the due to the event’s focus on women veterans?
    4. Has VA approved outreach activities at other VA facilities since January 22, 2025 which have involved other Members of Congress?
      1. If so, which Members, which facilities, and what is the distinction between those events and this planned event?
    5. What has caused VA to shift away from its previous policy regarding hosting on-campus events?
      1. Please provide a copy of the new policy, guidance, directive, or memo.
    6. What does VA define as an “outreach” activity?
    7. What would be considered an approved outreach activity?
    8. Will Congressional visits, tours, or in-person oversight actions of any kind no longer be allowed?
    9. What kind of in-person engagement will be allowable for the administration?

    In February 2024, Senator Murray hosted a roundtable discussion on improving health care for women veterans where she heard directly from VA officials as well as women veterans and Veteran Service Organizations. Senator Murray has hosted countless other events in conjunction with VA Puget Sound over the years.

    A PDF of the letter is available HERE.

    MIL OSI USA News –

    April 22, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Security: Detroit Man Pleads Guilty to Role in Huntington Methamphetamine Trafficking Organization

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

    HUNTINGTON, W.Va. – Mark Lawrence Lowe, also known as “Cell,” 24, of Detroit, Michigan, pleaded guilty today to aiding and abetting the possession with intent to distribute 50 grams or more of methamphetamine and 40 grams or more of fentanyl. Lowe admitted to his role in a drug trafficking organization (DTO) responsible for distributing large quantities of methamphetamine and fentanyl in the Huntington area.

    According to court documents and statements made in court, from at least September 2023 through November 2023, Lowe participated in the distribution of methamphetamine and fentanyl at various locations in the Southern District of West Virginia and elsewhere as part of the DTO.

    On September 9, 2023, Lowe and co-conspirator Paul Anthony Rucker were transporting fentanyl and methamphetamine from Huntington to Nitro when law enforcement conducted a traffic stop of their vehicle on Interstate 64 in Cabell County. An officer seized approximately 149 grams of fentanyl and 222.62 grams of methamphetamine from the vehicle during the traffic stop. As part of his guilty plea, Lowe admitted that he and Rucker intended to distribute the seized controlled substances.

    Lowe is scheduled to be sentenced on July 28, 2025, and faces a mandatory minimum of 10 years and up to life in prison, at least five years of supervised release, and a $10 million fine.

    Rucker, 47, of Nitro, was sentenced on July 15, 2024, to six years and six months in prison, to be followed by three years of supervised release, for aiding and abetting possession with intent to distribute quantities of methamphetamine and fentanyl.

    Lowe and Rucker are among 27 individuals indicted on charges alleging the DTO distributed methamphetamine and fentanyl transported from Detroit, Michigan, in Huntington and other locations within the Southern District of West Virginia.

    Lowe, Rucker and 22 other defendants have pleaded guilty, including one who pleaded guilty to a separate charges in lieu of the offenses alleged in the indictment. Charges against the remaining defendants are pending. An indictment is merely an allegation and the defendants are presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.

    Acting United States Attorney Lisa G. Johnston made the announcement and commended the investigative work of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the Cabell County Sheriff’s Department, the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), the Metropolitan Drug Enforcement Network Team (MDENT), the West Virginia State Police, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF), and the U.S. Postal Inspection Service. MDENT is composed of the Charleston Police Department, the Kanawha County Sheriff’s Office, the Putnam County Sheriff’s Office, the Nitro Police Department, the St. Albans Police Department and the South Charleston Police Department.

    United States District Judge Robert C. Chambers presided over the hearing. Assistant United States Attorneys Joseph F. Adams and Stephanie Taylor are prosecuting the case.

    The investigation was part of the Department of Justice’s Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Force (OCDETF). The program was established in 1982 to conduct comprehensive, multilevel attacks on major drug trafficking and money laundering organizations and is the keystone of the Department of Justice’s drug reduction strategy. OCDETF combines the resources and expertise of its member federal agencies in cooperation with state and local law enforcement. The principal mission of the OCDETF program is to identify, disrupt and dismantle the most serious drug trafficking organizations, transnational criminal organizations and money laundering organizations that present a significant threat to the public safety, economic, or national security of the United States.

    A copy of this press release is located on the website of the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of West Virginia. Related court documents and information can be found on PACER by searching for Case No. 3:23-cr-180.

    ###

     

    MIL Security OSI –

    April 22, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Security: Pittsburgh Woman Pleads Guilty to Credit Card Fraud and Aggravated Identity Theft Charges in Car Rental Scam

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

    PITTSBURGH, Pa. – A resident of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, pleaded guilty in federal court to charges of access device fraud and aggravated identity theft, Acting United States Attorney Troy Rivetti announced today.

    Tai Jauna Jones, 29, pleaded guilty to two counts before United States District Judge Marilyn J. Horan.

    In connection with the guilty plea, the Court was advised that Jones, through the dark web, obtained credit card numbers and other personal information of numerous individuals, and then was one of several co-defendants who provided the fraudulently obtained credit card numbers to a manager at a Monroeville car rental location. The manager rented the vehicles knowing that the true owners of the credit card numbers did not authorize the car rentals, renting a total of more than 140 vehicles in this manner to cause losses of more than $500,000.

    Judge Horan scheduled sentencing for August 14, 2025. The law provides for a total sentence of not less than two years and up to 12 years in prison, a fine of up to $500,000, or both. Under the federal Sentencing Guidelines, the actual sentence imposed is based upon the seriousness of the offenses and the prior criminal history, if any, of the defendant.

    Assistant United States Attorney Brendan T. Conway is prosecuting this case on behalf of the government.

    The United States Secret Service, in conjunction with the Pittsburgh Bureau of Police, conducted the investigation that led to the prosecution of Jones.

    MIL Security OSI –

    April 22, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Security: Serial Armed Robber Who Targeted Delivery Workers in DC, MD, Is Sentenced to 16 Years in Federal Prison

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

    WASHINGTON – Rubin Raphael Bordeaux, 36, of the District, was sentenced today in U.S. District Court to 192 months in prison for his role a string of armed carjackings that targeted delivery workers in November 2023. At the height of the criminal spree, Bordeaux’s escalating violence culminated in a shooting, an eight-mile chase in an Amazon van, a vehicle collision, and a foot chase.

               The sentence was announced by U.S. Attorney Edward R. Martin Jr., ATF Special Agent in Charge Anthony Spotswood of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives – Washington Division, and FBI Special Agent in Charge Sean T. Ryan of the Washington Field Office Criminal and Cyber Division.

               Bordeaux pleaded guilty on September 12, 2024, to carjacking and to possessing a firearm during a crime of violence. In addition to the 192-month prison term, U.S. District Court Judge Jia M. Cobb ordered Bordeaux to serve three years of supervised release.

               According to court documents, Bordeaux and his co-defendants specifically targeted delivery drivers in a spree of armed carjackings and robberies over four days across the District of Columbia and Maryland. 

               On November 9, 2023, around 1:30 p.m., a UPS driver was in the back of her work truck in Upper Marlboro, Maryland sorting packages. As she was working, Bordeaux and a co-conspirator were lying in wait, planning to rob her at gunpoint. As the UPS driver continued her job, the co-conspirator saw his opportunity and, with a silver firearm in hand, jumped into the back of the UPS truck. The co-conspirator told the UPS driver to “calm down. I just need your wallet and keys.” He took the UPS driver’s keys and ordered her to show him how to operate the UPS truck. In fear for her life, the UPS driver complied. The co-conspirator then threw the UPS driver’s phone in her direction and took off driving the truck. Bordeaux was not far behind. He followed the UPS truck in a tan pickup truck. Eventually Bordeaux and his co-conspirator stopped to offload packages from the UPS truck and abandoned the vehicle in Upper Marlboro, Maryland. 

                Just one hour later, Bordeaux and a co-conspirator struck again in Oxon Hill, Maryland. This time, they targeted a FedEx driver who was finishing a break. Bordeaux and the co-conspirator used their pickup truck to box-in the FedEx driver. Bordeaux jumped out of the pickup, quickly approached the FedEx driver, displayed a revolver, and demanded the keys. The FedEx driver gave up the company truck, and Bordeaux, followed by his co-conspirator in the tan pickup truck, drove off. Law enforcement recovered the FedEx truck in Washington, D.C., after it had been stripped of multiple packages. 

               Four days later, on November 13, 2023, Bordeaux and a co-conspirator targeted another work vehicle. On that day, around 5:24 a.m., an Amtrak driver was seated in the rear passenger seat of a conspicuously marked Amtrak truck. The Amtrak driver and his two coworkers, who were also in the vehicle, were planning to start their workday with breakfast from a restaurant. While waiting inside the running vehicle, the Amtrak driver noticed that a man with a mask had walked up to the truck. Believing this person was a coworker, the Amtrak driver got out of the truck. The masked individual was not his coworker. 

               Bordeaux ordered the Amtrak driver to “give me the truck.” When the Amtrak driver was slow to react, Bordeaux brandished a black gun and demanded again, “give me the truck.” The Amtrak driver surrendered the vehicle. Bordeaux got into the driver seat and drove away. As he did so, he was followed by a gray sedan. 

               Bordeaux later abandoned the truck in Washington, D.C. after causing $27,883 in damage to the vehicle during the short time he had it in his possession. 

               The next day, on November 14, 2023, Bordeaux and his co-conspirators targeted a shopper and her young child in a department store parking lot in Forestville, Maryland. An individual approached the woman at her car, demanded the keys to her vehicle and then forcefully removed the keys from her hands. The individual fled with the car toward Washington, D.C. 

               Later that day, Bordeaux and three other individuals left the shopper’s vehicle parked in an area of Southeast D.C. As the four walked away, they came upon an Amazon delivery driver, who became Bordeaux’s next target. The Amazon driver was walking to his work van when Bordeaux approached him in the road. A second person from Bordeaux’s group simultaneously walked towards the Amazon driver, who began to run. Bordeaux fired a shot in the Amazon driver’s direction while the other individual also fired at the Amazon driver. Bordeaux’s bullet barely missed the driver, who then stopped and surrendered. Bordeaux went through the Amazon driver’s pockets, demanded “give me them f—- keys” and threatened the driver with “do you want to die?” Bordeaux located the keys and fled in the van while his accomplice ran off in the opposite direction. 

               Behind the wheel of the Amazon van, Bordeaux led the police on an eight-mile-long chase crossing from the District of Columbia into Maryland. While trying to make his getaway, Bordeaux struck numerous vehicles, among them a police car. Once he realized he could not shake the police, Bordeaux stopped the vehicle on a sidewalk in Capitol Heights, Maryland. He attempted to run from law enforcement on foot but was quickly stopped. The keys to the shopper’s carjacked Honda were recovered from Bordeaux’s pocket.

             This case was investigated by the FBI Violent Crimes Task Force, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives Washington Field Office, the Prince George’s County Police Department, and the MPD. The matter is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Meredith Mayer-Dempsey, Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Emily Reeder-Ricchetti, and former Assistant U.S. Attorneys Omeed Ali Assefi and Jacqueline Yarbro.

    24cr76

    ##

    MIL Security OSI –

    April 22, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Security: Former US Forest Service law enforcement officer pleads guilty to fraud

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

    MISSOULA – A Thompson Falls man accused of falsifying time and attendance records admitted to charges today, U.S. Attorney Kurt Alme said.

    The defendant, Nathan J. Snead, 47, pleaded guilty to theft of government money. Snead faces ten years of imprisonment, a $250,000 fine, and three years of supervised release.

    U.S. Magistrate Judge Kathleen DeSoto presided. U.S. District Judge Dana Christensen will determine any sentence after considering the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and other statutory factors. Sentencing is set for August 27, 2025. Snead was released with conditions pending further proceedings.

    The government alleged in court documents that the defendant was required to work 40 hours of regular time per week, and he was compensated for administratively uncontrollable overtime, which is premium pay designed to compensate law enforcement officers (LEOs) for irregular and unscheduled overtime duty. In 2023, the defendant’s overtime rate was 15%, meaning he was required to justify an additional 5-7 hours per week to maintain that percentage at his next overtime review.

    The defendant documented his regular and overtime hours on his Time and Attendance Record for each pay period and signed the following certification: “I certify that the above information on hours worked and leave used is true and accurate.” The defendant also completed a record of overtime for each pay period in which he provided a case number and justification for the overtime and signed the following certification: “I certify that the official duties were performed as described above and were administratively uncontrollable.”

    On May 2, 2023, based on information Snead was not working his claimed hours, agents installed a GPS tracker on his government-issued patrol vehicle to monitor his movements. The tracker data showed Snead’s patrol vehicle was stationary at his house during hours he claimed to be working.

    On several occasions, Snead certified on his Time and Attendance Record he worked an 8-hour regular shift. However, his patrol vehicle remained stationary at his house for the entire 8 hours. Additionally, Snead claimed overtime hours when his patrol vehicle was stationary at his house for much of his regular shift and for the entire time of claimed overtime.

    Agents also evaluated Snead’s law enforcement statistics from 2021 through 2023. His productivity levels, measured via incident reports and the issuance of violation notices, were much lower than other similarly situated LEOs. The United States estimates Snead’s false time claims resulted in him stealing approximately $18,645.

    The U.S. Attorney’s Office prosecuted the case. The U.S. Forest Service conducted the investigation.

    XXX

    MIL Security OSI –

    April 22, 2025
  • MIL-Evening Report: Parents delay sending kids to school for social reasons and physical size. It’s not about academic advantage

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Penny Van Bergen, Associate Professor in the Psychology of Education, Macquarie University

    If you have a child born at the start of the year, you may be faced with a tricky and stressful decision. Do you send them to school “early”, in the year they turn five? Or do you “hold them back” and send them in the year they turn six?

    Media reports refer to parents who want to “hold children back”. This is particularly the case for boys. Some parents express concerns boys may develop more slowly and school activities may favour girls.

    Our new study surveyed Australian parents to understand their reasons for sending children to school early or on time or holding them back.

    School entry in Australia

    State regulations for the age of starting school vary across Australia, and between public, Catholic and independent schools.

    Typically, however, children born in the first part of the year can be sent to school in either the year they turn five or the year they turn six. This can lead to big age caps in a school year level.

    Public school cutoff dates are April 30 in Victoria, May 1 in South Australia, June 30 in Queensland and July 31 in New South Wales.

    A 2019 study of more than 160,000 NSW students showed overall, 26% of children were held back, although there was variation between different regions. This is much higher than in many other countries. For example, delayed entry is as low as 5.5% in the United States and 6% in Germany.




    Read more:
    A push to raise the school starting age to 6 sounds like good news for parents, but there’s a catch


    Our research

    In our research published in Early Education and Development, we surveyed 226 Australian parents who had a choice about whether to send their child to school in the year they turned five or six. Parents were from a mix of states and recruited via social media and a variety of other media, including parenting magazines.

    We found 29% of parents intended to send their child to school in the first year they were eligible and 66% planned to start later. About 5% were unsure. Consistent with trends in other countries, parents were almost four times as likely to report they intended to start boys later than girls.

    There were five key factors guiding their decisions.

    1. Money and work

    One group of factors, which we labelled “practical realities”, meant parents were more likely to send a child on time or early.

    This included high early childhood education costs (it is much cheaper to send a child to a government school than pay for daycare) and parents’ work demands (and the benefits of regular school hours). As one parent said:

    School is a cheaper option for many parents and community preschool (which is cheaper, depending on the number of days) is not a practical option for many working families.

    2. A child’s size

    Parents also considered their child’s physical size relative to their peers. Other studies suggest parents worry smaller boys will be bullied and will struggle to demonstrate sporting prowess.

    Reflecting on this trend, one parent said:

    I would prefer that my child wasn’t starting school with children well over a year older just because other parents think boys need a bit more time to mature. They are then significantly older and bigger by then.

    3. Social readiness

    Another group of factors involved children’s social, emotional and behavioral readiness for school. This includes their ability to pay attention and sit still, follow instructions, regulate and manage emotions and show empathy and consideration for others.

    One parent sending their child to school in the year they turn five said:

    Our child will be fine […] He is able, social and confident and hopefully this will mean he will have a positive school experience irrespective of what year he starts.

    Another who chose to hold their child back suggested:

    I want my child to be introduced to formal schooling as late as possible to ensure his brain development and emotional regulation are mature enough to handle the transition.

    4. Family time

    Another set of reasons influencing parents’ decisions was a desire to spend time together with their child before formal schooling. As one parent said:

    I always hear that no one ever regrets sending their child a bit later but they often regret sending early. I can afford for her to have an extra year of preschool and time at home and that is a luxury I acknowledge not everyone has.

    5. Milestones

    Parents also looked to the future and considered their child’s age relative to peers. This included when they would be starting high school or completing teenage milestones, such as driving, drinking, managing friendships and finishing school. This might explain why rates of holding children back vary by region. As one parent told us:

    The people around me having a choice (and holding their children back) ended up influencing my choice. She [my daughter] could have started school but would have been in a peer group that had been held back.

    What about academic concerns?

    Interestingly, parents did not typically express academic concerns or motivations (such as a desire to see their child move ahead of others academically) as a factor in their decision. Indeed, as one parent said:

    I have very strong beliefs about what school readiness means and for me it is much more than just being academically ready.

    Although there is evidence older children have a developmental advantage over younger children when entering school, academic benefits dissipate over time. For example, older children do better on Year 3 and 5 NAPLAN numeracy and literacy tests, but benefits fade or disappear by Year 9.

    What does this mean?

    Our research suggests the reasons why parents start a child early or hold them back are complex – and very much based on the needs of individual families and children.

    Taken together they suggest teachers not only need to accommodate a wide range of ages starting school but a sizeable portion of families who will have “delayed” school for a variety of personal reasons.

    Penny Van Bergen receives funding from the ARC, Google and the Marsden Fund.

    Naomi Sweller receives funding from the ARC.

    Rebecca Andrews receives funding from NSW Department of Education and the Australian Children’s Early Childhood Quality Authority.

    Anne McMaugh and Kay Bussey do not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and have disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    – ref. Parents delay sending kids to school for social reasons and physical size. It’s not about academic advantage – https://theconversation.com/parents-delay-sending-kids-to-school-for-social-reasons-and-physical-size-its-not-about-academic-advantage-254076

    MIL OSI Analysis – EveningReport.nz –

    April 22, 2025
  • MIL-Evening Report: ‘I’m a failure’: how schema therapy tackles the deep-rooted beliefs that affect our mental health

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Catherine Houlihan, Senior Lecturer in Clinical Psychology, University of the Sunshine Coast

    Jorm Sangsorn/Shutterstock

    If you ever find yourself stuck in repeated cycles of negative emotion, you’re not alone.

    More than 40% of Australians will experience a mental health issue in their lifetime. Many are linked to deep-rooted feelings that develop from childhood experiences.

    Changing these lifelong patterns takes time, energy and support. For some people, schema therapy can help.

    What is schema therapy?

    Schema therapy was developed in the 1990s by psychologist Jeffrey Young as an extension of cognitive behaviour therapy.

    Cognitive behaviour therapy is a popular psychotherapy that helps people change problematic patterns in their thoughts and behaviour, improving how they feel.

    Among psychological interventions, cognitive behaviour therapy has the strongest evidence for successfully treating the majority of mental health problems.

    However, not all conditions benefit from it.

    Cognitive behaviour therapy is brief (usually delivered across 10–12 sessions) and focuses on changing the “here and now”. But more complex issues – or those tied strongly to past experiences, such as multiple traumas – may need longer-term therapy.

    Like cognitive behaviour therapy, schema therapy aims to help reframe unhelpful ways of thinking through regular sessions with a psychotherapist.

    But instead of prioritising everyday challenges, it uncovers deep-rooted beliefs, explores how and why they formed, and how they affect day-to-day life and people’s perceptions of themselves.

    What are schemas?

    “Schemas” are mental blueprints that filter how we see ourselves, others and the world. Most of us are not consciously aware of them.

    Yet schemas run deep. Problematic ones – such as “I am a failure” or “others can’t be trusted” or “the world is scary and unsafe” – can affect our mental health and lead us to destructive patterns of thinking, feeling, and behaving.

    For example, someone with a “failure” schema may be highly sensitive to criticism, experience crippling anxiety, and have low self-worth. Having a “mistrust” schema may cause issues with forming close relationships and lead to loneliness and depression.

    Schemas run deep and can make us feel stuck.
    Raul Mallado Ortiz/Shutterstock

    How does schema therapy work?

    Therapists may specialise in schema therapy through additional training and supervision, which can lead to accreditation with the International Society of Schema Therapy.

    During schema therapy you and your therapist will discuss your current concerns and develop a safe and trusting relationship before exploring the problematic schemas that are affecting you today. Schema therapy may involve talking, completing a schema questionnaire, and engaging in therapeutic activities during and in between sessions.

    These activities are tailored to your situation, once you’ve explored which schemas affect you and what negative emotions arise. They are designed to help you process and heal from negative feelings such as helplessness, anger and shame.

    One such activity involves using mental imagery to revisit challenging experiences in your past and to reframe how you think about them.

    Another is to use empty chairs in the therapy room to speak to the different parts of yourself that are connected to the negative emotions. For example, talking to your child self, or to the side of you that tries to hide your feelings from others.

    After this you will work with your therapist to come up with positive behaviour change strategies and apply them in daily life. These could include things such as reducing procrastination and self-sacrificing behaviour (prioritising others’ needs over your own), regulating emotions, and setting healthy boundaries in relationships.

    Who does it work for?

    Schema therapy was specifically designed to help conditions that don’t respond to cognitive behaviour therapy. Since the early nineties, it has shown promise among people experiencing chronic depression and personality disorders, and people in prisons.

    Schema therapy is increasingly being used with children and adolescents, as it can effectively be adapted to suit younger age groups and help them understand the complex psychological processes involved.

    Schema therapy can take more time than some other approaches, including cognitive behaviour therapy. You may be working with your therapist for several months to a year before seeing real results.

    It is likely to benefit people who can commit to the time needed and prioritise their therapy tasks over other things.

    Like all therapies, schema therapy will take emotional energy. As you implement changes planned in therapy, enlisting the support of close friends or family may help you achieve long-lasting change.

    Schema therapy can be effectively adapted for children and young people.
    SeventyFour/Shutterstock

    I’m interested in schema therapy – what next?

    Maybe you are experiencing a problem that short-term therapies don’t easily address.

    Perhaps you have already tried cognitive behaviour therapy and have noticed some improvements in your mental health, but realise you still have some way to go. Or it’s possible you have exhausted self-help options and are looking for something that will change the deep-rooted feelings you think are connected to your past.

    Learning about different therapy approaches is the first step in finding the right help for you.

    The Schema Therapy Institute Australia has a list of schema therapists practising around the country.

    You may see “schema therapy” listed as a therapy approach on your local psychology practices’ web pages. You can also ask your GP about referrals using Medicare options.

    The authors do not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and have disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    – ref. ‘I’m a failure’: how schema therapy tackles the deep-rooted beliefs that affect our mental health – https://theconversation.com/im-a-failure-how-schema-therapy-tackles-the-deep-rooted-beliefs-that-affect-our-mental-health-250789

    MIL OSI Analysis – EveningReport.nz –

    April 22, 2025
  • MIL-Evening Report: Early voting opens in the federal election – but it brings some problems for voters and parties

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Zareh Ghazarian, Senior Lecturer in Politics, School of Social Sciences, Monash University

    More than 18 million Australians are enrolled to vote at the federal election on May 3.

    A fair proportion of them – perhaps as many as half – will take advantage of early voting, which starts Tuesday April 22.

    Hundreds of locations around Australia will morph into pre-polling centres for the next couple of weeks as we enter the final phase of the campaign.

    Australians have enthusiastically embraced the opportunity to vote early in recent elections. But there are some risks for voters if they jump the gun too quickly. And it’s upending the way parties and other candidates organise their campaigns.

    Go early

    The popularity of voting early has been on an upward trajectory in recent decades.

    Research shows that in 2004, for instance, over 80% of Australians waited until polling day to cast their ballots.

    But at the 2022 federal election, almost half of all Australians on the electoral roll voted early.

    There were variations across jurisdictions. Queensland had the highest rate of pre-poll voting at 56.6%, while Tasmanians had the lowest at just 36.8%.

    The Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) was actively encouraging people to vote early due to COVID concerns. Nonetheless, the trend is unmistakable. Voters want to skip the queues on election day.

    Logistical problems

    Early voting has been the subject of much scrutiny, especially the length of time it is available to voters. The major political parties have expressed concern about the impact it has on campaign planning and logistics.

    In its submission to a parliamentary inquiry into the conduct of the 2019 election, the Liberal Party highlighted how pre-poll voting placed “significant pressure on political parties” and their ability to provide booth workers for the entire early voting period, which was almost three weeks long.

    Similarly, Labor acknowledged “significant practical implications for political parties and campaign managers”. The Greens also indicated they were in favour of limiting the pre-poll period.

    Following the rise in early voting at the 2016 and 2019 elections, the Joint Standing Committee on Electoral Matters recommended pre-polling be restricted to a fortnight before election day.

    The committee noted:

    a two week period best balances the opportunity to participate in an election as a voter, with the logistic demands placed on those who participate as contestants.

    The electoral laws were subsequently changed by the Morrison government in 2021.

    But given Easter Monday and Anzac Day both fall within the fortnight preceding May 3, the early polling window for this election will be further reduced.

    Campaign disruption

    The rising popularity of early voting plays havoc with the campaign plans of all candidates.

    In the past, when the overwhelming majority of voters waited for election day, it made sense for the major parties in particular to continually drip feed promises and announcements until the last day of voting.

    Parties now have less time to pitch for support during the campaign. The critical window of opportunity to appeal to voters is the time between the election being called and when Australians flock to the polls at the start of early voting.

    It is highly likely we have already seen all the major policies in this election, including the voter-friendly cost-of-living measures.

    But the parties are in a bind, because they must continue to appeal to the significant number of voters who will be considering who to vote for right up until election day itself.

    Skip the queue

    While many people will be tempted to vote early, the Australian Electoral Commission’s website reminds us there are some conditions for pre-poll voting.

    You can only vote early, either in person or by post, if on polling day you are:

    • travelling or unable to leave your workplace to vote
    • sick or due to give birth, or caring for someone who is
    • a person with a disability, or caring for someone who is
    • in prison serving a sentence of less than three years
    • prevented by religious beliefs from attending on election day
    • a silent elector, or reasonably fearful for your safety or wellbeing.

    Aware of the temptation to pre-poll, the AEC says people who wait until election day won’t have to battle long queues. In fact, 75% of them will be in and out of the polling place in under 15 minutes.

    The AEC says it’s worked out ways to minimise queuing on election day.

    Voter beware

    The numbers don’t lie. More and more voters are keen to participate in the democratic process before election day.

    However, voting early could be a double-edged sword. It may be convenient, but there is always the risk candidates or parties could say or do something that antagonises a voter after they have cast their ballot.

    As there is no way to withdraw an original vote or cast a new one if they change their minds, early voters are taking a risk.

    Moreover, by voting early, people may be missing out on the sausage sizzle, the craft stands, and the bake sales that many communities hold on voting day. These election day traditions raise funds and add a special community feeling to the ultimate exercise of democracy – choosing a government.

    Zareh Ghazarian does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    – ref. Early voting opens in the federal election – but it brings some problems for voters and parties – https://theconversation.com/early-voting-opens-in-the-federal-election-but-it-brings-some-problems-for-voters-and-parties-254172

    MIL OSI Analysis – EveningReport.nz –

    April 22, 2025
  • MIL-Evening Report: Rates will never be enough – councils need the power to raise money in other ways

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Guy C. Charlton, Adjunct Associate Professor at Auckland University of Technology and Associate Professor, University of New England

    Getty Images

    You might have recently received voting papers for your local body elections. Going by our historically low participation rates, many of those envelopes will remain unopened.

    This is a shame, because New Zealand’s local authorities face major financial challenges that affect nearly everyone. Only by increasing democratic engagement and giving ratepayers more reason to vote will real change happen.

    Local Government New Zealand recently estimated an extra NZ$11 billion is needed over the next seven years to meet unexpected cost increases. The credit rating agency S&P Global has downgraded 18 councils and three council-controlled organisations, and given negative outlooks to three more councils.

    The auditor-general reported in February that inflation has driven up the costs of construction, insurance and debt servicing. This is putting pressure on operational expenses and capital improvements at the same time as demand for council services is increasing.

    The central government problem

    Central government supports councils primarily through grants, subsidies, shared revenue (such as from road taxes) and development contributions. But its main response to the financial stress now being felt has been to urge local governments to focus on “core tasks”, not “pet” and “vanity” projects.

    To that end, the government has introduced annual council benchmark reports that will compare rates, debt levels, capital spending breakdowns and road conditions. It is also amending in the Local Government Act to remove references to the social, economic, environmental and cultural wellbeing of communities.

    It also wants to encourage inter-council cooperation with its Regional Deals Strategic Framework and streamline resource management requirements that it believes hinder economic development.

    It is unlikely these measures will be enough. Government contributions to councils have averaged around 10% of local government operating income since 2000, not enough to meet increasing legal and infrastructure costs.

    Other OECD countries transfer significantly higher proportions of central taxes to local governments. In New Zealand, this might include central government reimbursing taxes and other revenues it captures due to local government activity (such the GST on rates).

    The government could also pick up local costs that have national benefits, such as water and wastewater capacity at prime international tourism destinations. But more fundamental reform is needed.

    Councils’ operational budgets are static while demand for their services are increasing.
    Getty Images

    Rates aren’t enough

    At the moment, councils generate about 80% of their income from general and targeted rates, with the rest coming from things such as parking fines, amenities fees and investment interest.

    This heavy reliance of rates is clearly inadequate to pay for local operational and infrastructure costs. This is despite recent court decisions giving councils more leeway to set, raise and target rates.

    But to really make a difference, councils must also be given the legal authority to raise additional revenue themselves. This could include excise taxes on petrol and visitor accommodation, sales taxes and stamp duties.

    As the recently repealed Auckland regional fuel tax demonstrated, excise taxes can be an effective way to raise funds for specific activities. The roughly $780 million it raised helped pay for the Eastern Busway ($272 million) and new commuter train cars ($330 million).

    Room or lodging levies on overnight stays in hotels, motels, campgrounds, Airbnb and other short-term visitor rentals can help mitigate the impacts of tourism on local infrastructure and services.

    In the Queenstown Lakes district, for example, a 5% levy on the estimated $413 million spent on accommodation in 2023 would generate $210 million over ten years, about 30% of the $756 million cost attributed to tourism.

    Councils could also add a small extra levy on GST in their regions, a common practice in many large American cities and counties. Or they could apply a stamp duty on things like real estate transactions as Australia does.

    Stamp duties might be a political non-starter in New Zealand. But what are known as “tax incremental districts” could be an effective way of offsetting the infrastructure and public facilities costs of new developments or economic revitalisation projects.

    These schemes work by applying incremental increases in rates during the private development of an area. Done properly, they can be useful in brownfield redevelopment sites, as well as speeding up housing developments on city fringes.

    Reinvigorating local democracy

    New taxes are rarely popular, and selling the idea of local governments levying other sources of revenue to already stretched ratepayers will be difficult. But infrastructure and other costs cannot simply be ignored and passed down to future generations.

    On top of more funding from central government, local authorities need the flexibility to creatively address their financial and infrastructure needs. The decision on whether and how they do this ultimately resides with ratepayers and electors.

    Having more authority would also create more accountability in local government, reinvigorate local democracy and encourage overall policy innovation.

    Without greater funding authority and fewer constraints on their activities, elected community representatives risk becoming mere administrators of central government policy rather than truly reflecting and shaping their electorates.


    The author thanks Avi Charlton Diesch, a post-graduate student in finance at the University of Hong Kong, for his help with the preparation of this article.


    Guy C. Charlton does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    – ref. Rates will never be enough – councils need the power to raise money in other ways – https://theconversation.com/rates-will-never-be-enough-councils-need-the-power-to-raise-money-in-other-ways-252718

    MIL OSI Analysis – EveningReport.nz –

    April 22, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Welch Hosts Event on His New Bipartisan, Bicameral Bill to Expand Telehealth

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator Peter Welch (D-Vermont)

    BURLINGTON, VT – U.S. Senator Peter Welch (D-Vt.) today discussed his new bipartisan, bicameral legislation to expand coverage of telehealth services through Medicaid, the Creating Opportunities Now for Necessary and Effective Care Technologies (CONNECT) for Health Act, while visiting the Thayer House in Burlington. Senator Welch was joined at the Thayer House by a clinician from Cathedral Square’s Support and Services at Home (SASH) program, Vermont patients, and health care providers.  
    “The COVID-19 pandemic proved that telehealth not only works, but is essential,” Senator Welch said about the CONNECT for Health Act. “Rural and underserved areas in Vermont, and across the country, need modern solutions to help get folks connected to care, and increasing telehealth services must be part of the answer. This bipartisan bill takes commonsense steps to bridge that gap and make sure that our policies adapt to the capabilities of our technology.”  
    The Thayer House is an affordable living community for Vermonters aged 55 and older, and is a SASH program location. SASH is based in more than 140 living communities throughout the state and supports the health of Vermonters who rely on Medicare. 
    The CONNECT for Health Act would make COVID-19 telehealth flexibilities permanent, improve health outcomes, and make it easier for patients to connect with their doctors. Current Medicare telehealth flexibilities will expire on September 30th, 2025, without Congressional action. Telehealth provides essential access to care, with nearly a quarter of Americans accessing telehealth monthly. Telemedicine is also on the rise in Vermont, with 92% of healthcare providers in the state reporting use of audio/video services to provide care to patients in the past 60 days.  
    See photos from the event below:  

    “In a rural, northern state such as Vermont, our patients face many barriers that limit their ability to physically reach our offices– lack of transportation, bad weather, back roads, days that get dark early during our long winters.  These factors hit our older patients particularly hard.  One tool that is helping patients get the care they need is to be able to see us from home using telehealth.  The Vermont Medical Society and Vermont Academy of Family Physicians thank Senator Welch for introducing this important legislation and call on Congress to join him in ensuring patients with Medicare can continue to make use of telehealth visits,” said Anne Morris, MD, family physician, Milton, VT; Board member, Vermont Medical Society and past-president of the Vermont Academy of Family Physicians. 
    “Telehealth visits increase our resident’s access to care, are more convenient, and save travel time. Telehealth visits also allow our nurses to participate with residents. This can improve the resident’s understanding of their care and ensures that our staff have an in depth understanding of the care plan,” said Jessiyln Dolan, RN, a SASH Wellness Nurse.  
    “Telehealth is so much easier and I never have to cancel.  I can’t do computers very well, so having help from SASH makes it possible to talk to my doctor. I don’t have a car, and it is hard to get a ride to the doctor’s office,” said Helen Mischik, a resident of Thayer House.  
    The CONNECT for Health Act is cosponsored by a broad bipartisan coalition of more than 60 Senators and is led by Senator Welch and Sens. Brian Schatz (D-Hawai‘i), Roger Wicker (R-Miss.), Mark Warner (D-Va.), Cindy Hyde-Smith (R-Miss.), and John Barrasso (R-Wyo.). Companion legislation has been introduced in the House of Representatives. The CONNECT for Health Act has the support of more than 150 organizations, including the American Medical Association, AARP, American Hospital Association, National Association of Community Health Centers, National Association of Rural Health Clinics, and American Telemedicine Association.   

    MIL OSI USA News –

    April 22, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Security: U.S. Attorneys for Southwestern Border Districts Charge More than 1,220 Illegal Aliens with Immigration-Related Crimes During the Third week in April as part of Operation Take Back America.

    Source: United States Attorneys General 1

    Since the inauguration of President Trump, the Department of Justice is playing a critical role in Operation Take back America, a nationwide initiative to repel the invasion of illegal immigration, achieve total elimination of cartels and transnational criminal organizations (TCOs), and protect our communities from perpetrators of violent crime. Operation Take Back America streamlines efforts and resources from the Department’s Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Forces (OCDETFs) and Project Safe Neighborhood (PSN).

    Last week, the U.S. Attorneys for Arizona, Central California, Southern California, New Mexico, Southern Texas, and Western Texas charged more than 1,220 defendants with criminal violations of U.S. immigration laws.

    The Southern District of Texas filed 216 cases in immigration and security-related matters. As part of those cases, 86 face allegations of illegally reentering the country with the majority having felony convictions such as narcotics, firearms or sexual offenses, or prior immigration crimes. A total of 119 people face charges of illegally entering the country while 11 cases involve various instances of human smuggling. Some of those charged with felony reentry include Mexican national Alejandro Contreras-Zapata, who was allegedly found near Roma. The charges allege he had been previously sentenced to 20 years in prison for aggravated assault with a deadly weapon before his removal March 7.

    The Western District of Texas filed 378 new immigration-related criminal cases. Among the new cases, Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s Enforcement Removal Operations (ICE ERO) agents in San Antonio received notification that Mexican national Netsai Moreno-Suarez was arrested for a traffic violation on April 11. Moreno-Suarez was transferred into ICE ERO custody, charged with illegal re-entry. She was previously removed from the United States in August 2023 after being convicted for conspiracy to transport illegal aliens and being sentenced to five years of probation. If convicted, Moreno-Suarez faces up to 20 years in federal prison.

    The District of Arizona brought immigration-related criminal charges against 328 defendants. Specifically, the United States filed 130 cases in which aliens illegally re-entered the United States, and the United States also charged 179 aliens for illegally entering the United States. In its ongoing effort to deter unlawful immigration, the United States filed 16 cases against 18 individuals responsible for smuggling illegal aliens into and within the District of Arizona. The United States also charged one individual with failing to register, as required by law.

    The Southern District of California filed 135 border-related cases this week, including charges of transportation of illegal aliens, bringing in aliens for financial gain, reentering the U.S. after deportation, deported alien found in the United States, and importation of controlled substances. A sample of border-related arrests this week: On April 15, Jesus Manuel Zuniga Huerta and Jose Alberto Flores Avalos of Mexico were arrested at the Otay Mesa Port of Entry and charged with importing deadly fentanyl into the U.S. According to a complaint, Customs and Border Protection officers discovered 148 pounds of fentanyl in the rear frame well of a tractor-trailer driven by Zuniga Huerta. On April 15, Brian Jaime Sanchez, a Mexican national, was arrested and charged with Bringing in Aliens for Financial Gain. According to a complaint, Customs and Border Protection officers found an undocumented immigrant concealed in the trunk of Sanchez’s car as he attempted to cross the border at the Tecate Port of Entry. On April 17, Sergio Villalba-Serrano, a Mexican national, was arrested and charged with Departed Alien Found in the United States. According to a complaint, Villalba-Serrano was taken into custody near the Tecate Port of Entry after his vehicle was stopped by U.S. Border Patrol agents. Villalba-Serrano had previously been deported on Oct. 26, 2019, from Laredo, Texas.

    The Central District of California filed criminal charges against 34 defendants who are alleged to have been found in the United States following removal, the Justice Department announced today. Many of the defendants charged previously were convicted of felony offenses prior to their removal from the United States, including domestic violence, unlawful sex with a minor, and assault with a deadly weapon.

    The District of New Mexico brought the following criminal charges in New Mexico: 68 individuals were charged this week with Illegal Reentry After Deportation (8 U.S.C. 1326), 10 individuals were charged this week with Alien Smuggling (8 U.S.C. 1324), and 55 individuals were charged this week with Illegal Entry (8 U.S.C. 1325).  Many of the defendants charged pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1326 had prior criminal convictions for possession of a dangerous weapon by a restricted person, aggravated driving under the influence and possession of a forgery writing/device.

    We are grateful for the hard work of our border prosecutors in bringing these cases and helping to make our border safe again. 

    MIL Security OSI –

    April 22, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: CarGurus To Report First Quarter 2025 Financial Results

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    BOSTON, April 21, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — CarGurus, Inc. (Nasdaq: CARG), the No. 1 visited digital auto platform for shopping, buying, and selling new and used vehicles1, announced it will issue a press release reporting financial results for the quarter ended March 31, 2025, after the close of the market on May 8, 2025.

    CarGurus will host a conference call and live webcast to discuss those financial results for investors and analysts at 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on May 8, 2025. To access the conference call, dial (877) 451-6152 for the U.S. or Canada, or (201) 389-0879 for international callers. The webcast will be available live on the Investors section of the company’s website at https://investors.cargurus.com.

    An audio replay of the call will also be available to investors beginning at approximately 8:00 p.m. Eastern Time on May 8, 2025, until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on May 22, 2025, by dialing (844) 512-2921 for the U.S. or Canada, or (412) 317-6671 for international callers, and entering passcode 13752230. In addition, an archived webcast will be available on the Investors section of the company’s website at https://investors.cargurus.com.

    About CarGurus, Inc.

    CarGurus (Nasdaq: CARG) is a multinational, online automotive platform for buying and selling vehicles that is building upon its industry-leading listings marketplace with both digital retail solutions and the CarOffer online wholesale platform. The CarGurus platform gives consumers the confidence to purchase and/or sell a vehicle either online or in-person, and it gives dealerships the power to accurately price, effectively market, instantly acquire, and quickly sell vehicles, all with a nationwide reach. The company uses proprietary technology, search algorithms, and data analytics to bring trust, transparency, and competitive pricing to the automotive shopping experience. CarGurus is the most visited automotive shopping site in the U.S. 1

    In addition to the U.S. marketplace, the company operates online marketplaces under the CarGurus brand in Canada and the U.K., as well as independent online marketplace brands Autolist in the U.S. and PistonHeads in the U.K.

    To learn more about CarGurus, visit www.cargurus.com, and for more information about CarOffer, visit www.caroffer.com.

    CarGurus® is a registered trademark of CarGurus, Inc., and CarOffer® is a registered trademark of CarOffer, LLC. All other product names, trademarks, and registered trademarks are the property of their respective owners.

    1Similarweb: Traffic Report [Cars.com, Autotrader, TrueCar, CARFAX Listings (defined as CARFAX Total visits minus Vehicle History Reports traffic)], Q4 2024, U.S.

    Investor Contact:
    Kirndeep Singh
    Vice President, Head of Investor Relations
    investors@cargurus.com

    Media Contact:
    Maggie Meluzio
    Director, Public Relations & External Communications
    pr@cargurus.com

    The MIL Network –

    April 22, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: Tactile Medical to Release First Quarter of Fiscal Year 2025 Financial Results on May 5, 2025

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    MINNEAPOLIS, April 21, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Tactile Systems Technology, Inc. (“Tactile Medical”; the “Company”) (Nasdaq: TCMD), a medical technology company providing therapies for people with chronic disorders, today announced that first quarter of fiscal year 2025 financial results will be released after the market closes on Monday, May 5, 2025.

    Management will host a conference call with a question and answer session at 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on May 5, 2025, to discuss the results of the quarter. Those who would like to participate may dial 877-407-3088 (201-389-0927 for international callers) and provide access code 13752588. A live webcast of the call will also be provided on the investor relations section of the Company’s website at investors.tactilemedical.com.

    For those unable to participate, a replay of the call will be available for two weeks at 877-660-6853 (201-612-7415 for international callers); access code 13752588. The webcast will be archived at investors.tactilemedical.com.

    About Tactile Systems Technology, Inc. (DBA Tactile Medical)

    Tactile Medical is a leader in developing and marketing at-home therapies for people suffering from underserved, chronic conditions including lymphedema, lipedema, chronic venous insufficiency and chronic pulmonary disease by helping them live better and care for themselves at home. Tactile Medical collaborates with clinicians to expand clinical evidence, raise awareness, increase access to care, reduce overall healthcare costs and improve the quality of life for tens of thousands of patients each year.

    Investor Inquiries:
    Sam Bentzinger
    Gilmartin Group
    investorrelations@tactilemedical.com

    The MIL Network –

    April 22, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Nadler Statement On Proposed Trump Cuts to Domestic HIV Programs 

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Jerrold Nadler (10th District of New York)

    WASHINGTON, DC –  Today, Congressman Jerrold Nadler (NY-12) made the following statement in response to the Trump Administration’s reported plan to slash over $40 billion from the Department of Health and Human Services and eliminate all dedicated domestic HIV prevention programs: 

    “It is unconscionable that the Trump Administration has proposed cutting over a third of the Department of Health and Human Services’ budget. As a proud, longtime champion for federal HIV prevention and assistance programs, I am appalled that the administration’s proposed budget would eliminate all federal HIV prevention efforts and devastate funding for HIV research. This is yet another exceptionally cruel and reckless move by the Trump Administration, and it would have devastating consequences for our nation’s public health.

    “Over a million people in this country are living with HIV/AIDS, including more than 100,000 in New York State and over 60,000 in New York City alone. Young people, gay and bisexual men, and people of color are being disproportionately affected. Eliminating our nation’s HIV/AIDS prevention programs would mean many of the most vulnerable among us would lose access to HIV testing, prevention, and care. Simply put, Americans will die as a direct result of the Trump Administration’s cuts.

    “Trump’s budget proposal would eliminate the Ending the HIV/AIDS Epidemic Initiative, the CDC’s Division of HIV Prevention, and the Minority AIDS Initiative. It also eviscerates funding for the Ryan White HIV/AIDS program and slashes the NIH’s budget by 40%. NIH funds the vast majority of research driving breakthroughs in HIV treatment. Trump’s proposed budget cuts compound Republican proposals to slash Medicaid in the upcoming budget reconciliation process, as 40% of adults with HIV are covered by Medicaid.

    “We’ve seen this kind of cruelty before. In the 1980s, we had a President who ignored an epidemic and a Congress reluctant to devote resources to finding its cure. The federal government turned its back on people fighting HIV/AIDS, and as a result, we lost a generation of young men and women far too soon. Nearly half a century later, the administration has put forth a budget proposal that once again abandons Americans who are fighting HIV/AIDS.

    “However, Trump can’t unilaterally make these cuts; he needs the consent of Congress. I vow to continue to fight for full funding for our nation’s HIV/AIDS prevention and research programs in the congressional appropriations process. I’ve led the congressional effort to increase funding for the Housing Opportunities for People with AIDS program, or HOPWA, for over 3 decades. Since its inception in 1992, HOPWA has provided critical housing support to low-income people living with HIV. Linking individuals living with HIV to stable, supportive housing leads to an 80% reduction in mortality from AIDS.

    “New York has always led the fight against HIV/AIDS, and we will not turn our backs now. It is up to this Congress to ensure that Trump’s devastating cuts never become reality. Congress must summon the resolve of the generations who came before us—activists like the founders of ACT UP and Gay Men’s Health Crisis—and fight with everything we have to protect the progress we’ve made.”

    ### 

    MIL OSI USA News –

    April 22, 2025
←Previous Page
1 … 1,268 1,269 1,270 1,271 1,272 … 2,663
Next Page→
NewzIntel.com

NewzIntel.com

MIL Open Source Intelligence

  • Blog
  • About
  • FAQs
  • Authors
  • Events
  • Shop
  • Patterns
  • Themes

Twenty Twenty-Five

Designed with WordPress