Category: Transport

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: Iran: Officials responsible for finger-amputations must face accountability for torture

    Source: Amnesty International –

    Responding to the Iranian authorities’ use of a guillotine machine to amputate the fingers of three men in Urumieh Central Prison on 30 July as corporal punishment imposed after a grossly unfair, torture-tainted trial, Hussein Baoumi, Deputy Regional Director for the Middle East and North Africa at Amnesty International, said:  

    “The amputations carried out on Hadi Rostami, Mehdi Sharafian and Mehdi Shahivand are a stark reminder of Iran’s prolific use of corporal punishment and the inhumanity of a justice system that legalizes brutality. Amputation constitutes torture, which is a crime under international law, and is a flagrant and abhorrent assault on human dignity. For six years, these men lived in a waking nightmare, knowing the authorities could at any moment irreversibly mutilate their bodies with a judicial seal.  

    We call on the Iranian authorities to immediately halt all further plans to carry out such cruel and inhuman sentences and urgently abolish all forms of corporal punishment in law and practice including flogging and blinding.

    Hussein Baoumi, Deputy Regional Director for the Middle East and North Africa at Amnesty International.

    “We call on the Iranian authorities to immediately halt all further plans to carry out such cruel and inhuman sentences and urgently abolish all forms of corporal punishment in law and practice including flogging and blinding. They must provide these three men full reparations, including compensation, rehabilitation, medical and psychological care, and social and legal services, and guarantees of non-repetition. 

    “Iran’s judicial system is a vital cog in the machinery of torture. With systematic impunity in Iran, these unspeakably cruel punishments will be repeated unless the international community takes sustained action to bring an end to the Iranian authorities’ crimes. We call on all states to forcefully condemn this crime of torture and do everything in their power to pressure the Iranian authorities to immediately abolish corporal punishments. We further urge states to exercise universal jurisdiction to investigate and prosecute Iranian officials suspected of criminal responsibility for such crimes under international law.” 

    Background  

    At 10pm on 30 July 2025, prison authorities at Urumieh Central Prison, West Azerbaijan province, transferred Hadi Rostami (38), Mehdi Sharafian (42), and Mehdi Shahivand (29) to the office for the implementation of sentences to carry out their amputations. Blindfolded, handcuffed and shackled, the men had four fingers on their right hands amputated by 12am. Prison authorities used a guillotine machine to cut off the men’s fingers in the presence of senior prison and prosecution officials whose names are on record with Amnesty International. The prison authorities briefly took the men to a medical clinic to have their fingers stitched and bandaged before returning them to prison where the specialist physical and mental healthcare they urgently require is unavailable. 

    The authorities denied the men access to lawyers before their trial and used forced “confessions” which the men said were obtained under torture and other ill-treatment, including beatings, flogging, rape threats, and being hung from their wrists and feet, to convict them. Hadi Rostami was never allowed access to a lawyer, even at trial. 

    Iran is among a handful of countries in the world that retains corporal punishments. The Iranian authorities have carried out amputation sentences of multiple other prisoners in recent years. Amnesty International knows of two other men – Kasra Karami and Morteza Esmaeilian – who are currently under finger-amputation sentences in Urumieh Central prison, West Azerbaijan province, and Tabriz prison, East Azerbaijan province, respectively. Scores of others are also at risk. 

    To read more about the cases of Hadi Rostami, Mehdi Sharafian, and Mehdi Shahivand, see this Urgent Action.  

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI Analysis: Accessible, high-quality summer programs and Black joy support Black children’s return to school

    Source: The Conversation – Canada – By Ardavan Eizadirad, Associate Professor, Faculty of Education, Wilfrid Laurier University

    Summer is popularly imagined as bringing joy to all young people. Yet it is not an equal break or of the same quality for all students.

    Learning loss is the decline in academic skills and knowledge that can occur when students are not engaged in structured learning, especially during extended breaks like summer.

    It disproportionately impacts Black and low-income students who face greater systemic disadvantages within the education system.

    Black families face challenges in accessing culturally relevant and affirming summer opportunities. As work by education researcher Obianuju Juliet Bushi and others has documented, for many Black families, the question isn’t just “what will my child do this summer?” It’s “where can my child go to be safe, affirmed and supported?”




    Read more:
    Where can Black children go in summer? Black families face disparities and need equitable options


    Without access to affordable enrichment programs during the summmer, many students fall behind in reading and math, further widening the opportunity gap when school resumes in September.

    As the manager of research with the charitable, Black-led non-profit organization Youth Association for Academics, Athletics and Character Education (YAAACE) in the Jane Finch area of Toronto, I share insights about how culturally responsive community programs can address opportunity gaps, and how parents in Black families can support their kids’ successful transition back to school.

    This article draws on insights from conversations I have had with various YAAACE program participants, parents and educators, as well as leadership, including Devon Jones, Nene, and Dave Mitchell.




    Read more:
    If I could change one thing in education: Community-school partnerships would be top priority


    Anti-Black racism in education

    Despite Canada’s reputation for multiculturalism, systemic anti-Black racism remains deeply embedded in the education system, contributing to unequal opportunities for students.

    The opportunity gap refers to the unequal access to resources, supports and learning experiences that affect students’ ability to succeed, often based on race, income and geography.

    In March 2025, the Ontario Human Rights Commission released a report, “Dreams Delayed: Addressing Systemic Anti-Black Racism and Discrimination in Ontario’s Public Education System.”

    The findings confirmed that Ontario’s schools are saturated with systemic barriers for Black children and their families. These barriers include: disproportionate discipline; being streamed into non-academic tracks; lack of Black leadership in schools; Eurocentric curriculum; insufficient disaggregated identity-based data collection; and lack of access to culturally affirming environments.




    Read more:
    ‘Dreams delayed’ no longer: Report identifies key changes needed around Black students’ education


    The cost is devastating and contributes to academic underachievement, racial trauma, disengagement and the reproduction of the school-to-prison pipeline.

    This is particularly the case in low-income communities.

    Centring Black excellence

    Black youth often face higher exposure to poverty, systemic underemployment, community violence and the emotional weight of intergenerational trauma and racism.

    While these experiences shape the mental health and academic outcomes of students, schools often lack culturally relevant supports or trauma-informed responses.

    Summer programs are one important part of countering anti-Black racism in schools. These can support student transitions by mitigating learning loss and helping to close the opportunity gap.

    Programs that centre Africentricity and Black excellence led by staff with lived experiences provide culturally responsive and emotionally supportive environments that affirm Black identities.




    Read more:
    Ontario can close students’ access and opportunity gaps with community-led projects


    This builds confidence in Black students and ensures students return to school in the fall better prepared to thrive academically, socially, emotionally and culturally.

    Community-driven youth programs

    Since 2007, YAAACE has provided academic, athletic, family supports, employment and mentorship to more than 1,000 children and families annually across Toronto. Its programs are led by Black educators and mentors who reflect the community and understand the lived experiences of the youth they serve in low-income communities like the Jane and Finch neighbourhood.

    YAAACE’s seven-week Summer Institute offers a model that affirms identity, cultivates belonging and accelerates achievement. Each summer, approximately 300 students from grades 3 through 12 attend the institute, which blends literacy and numeracy instruction with culturally responsive learning, arts-based programming, robotics, mentorship and athletics.

    Students are taught by Ontario certified teachers and supported by Black staff and practitioners trained in trauma-informed care. For families who can’t afford camp fees, the program is free or subsidized.

    This is a results-based, community-driven intervention that mitigates the opportunity gap for Black students from low-income communities by creating access to experiential learning opportunities. It’s also violence prevention and intervention that builds character and supports students, with a focus on the early years.

    Cycle of empowerment

    YAAACE’s Inspire Academy Mathematics Program provides early access to high school math courses. Grade 8 graduates earn a high school math credit through an intensive summer course led by a team of teachers and teacher assistants in a supportive, inclusive environment. In cases where students are behind provincial standards, they receive additional supports with low staff-to-student ratios.

    Based on assessments administered by the teachers and reports provided to all the parents, students leave the institute more confident in their academics, better prepared to return to school and grounded culturally in who they are. Families report higher levels of engagement and lower levels of stress knowing their children are in safer, affirming spaces.

    Many of YAAACE’s youth return as peer leaders and mentors, reinforcing a cycle of empowerment.

    Programs like YAAACE do not just help kids do better in school. They also reduce long-term costs to the health-care, justice and social service systems by interrupting cycles of trauma and marginalization before they escalate.

    Tips for parents

    Summer is a crucial time to support children’s learning and well-being, especially for Black families navigating systems that often overlook their strengths.

    Below are three practical ways to support your child during the summer break and when school starts in September.

    Centre empowering examples of Black identity and culture: Expose your children to books, films, music and conversations that celebrate Black history and excellence, Africentricity and positive role models. Affirming cultural roots builds pride, resilience and a sense of belonging in systems that too often erase or distort those narratives from stereotypical perspectives.

    Create routines that balance learning and Black joy: Set daily routines that include reading, writing or problem solving but just as much make space for rest, play, creativity and movement rooted in Black joy. Learning should be holistic and joyful. It’s important as parents, guardians and community leaders that we not only talk about this but more importantly model it.

    ‘Refresh, Revive, Thrive: Black Joy in Education’ with Andrew B. Campbell, assistant professor at the University of Toronto.

    Stay engaged and be an advocate: Get to know your child’s teachers and school administrators, review school policies to be familiar with how to navigate them (for example, getting accommodations for your child’s needs) and request culturally affirming resources. Don’t hesitate to raise concerns, as your advocacy helps create more supportive learning environments and shows your child that their success is worth fighting for.

    Partnerships with Black-led organizations

    Trauma-informed, culturally responsive education must become a system-wide standard.

    This becomes a reality by building long-term partnerships with Black-led community organizations. It means embedding mental health supports and curriculum content that reflect the cultural identities and lived realities of Black diasporas. And it means collecting disaggregated race-based data to track progress and guide informed decision-making.

    It starts by funding proven data-driven programs, training educators and holding systems accountable to measurable outcomes.

    Ardavan Eizadirad receives funding from Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC).

    ref. Accessible, high-quality summer programs and Black joy support Black children’s return to school – https://theconversation.com/accessible-high-quality-summer-programs-and-black-joy-support-black-childrens-return-to-school-261908

    MIL OSI Analysis

  • MIL-OSI USA: FDA Requires Major Changes to Opioid Pain Medication Labeling to Emphasize Risks

    Source: US Department of Health and Human Services – 3

    For Immediate Release:
    July 31, 2025

    The U.S. Food and Drug Administration is requiring safety labeling changes to all opioid pain medications to better emphasize and explain the risks associated with their long-term use. These changes follow a public advisory committee meeting in May that reviewed data showing serious risks—such as misuse, addiction, and both fatal and non-fatal overdoses—for patients who use opioids over long periods. “The death of almost one million Americans during the opioid epidemic has been one of the cardinal failures of the public health establishment,” said FDA Commissioner Marty Makary, M.D., M.P.H. “This long-overdue labeling change is only part of what needs to be done — we also need to modernize our approval processes and post-market monitoring so that nothing like this ever happens again.” Tragically, the new drug application for OxyContin was initially approved without study data supporting its long term use to treat pain in many patient populations for which it has been prescribed. The updated labeling change reflects robust data from two large FDA-required observational studies, called postmarketing requirements (PMR) 3033-1 and 3033-2, which recently provided new data on how long-term opioid use can lead to serious side effects. After reviewing those results, public comments, medical research and recognizing the absence of adequate and well-controlled studies on long-term opioid effectiveness, the FDA decided to require safety labeling changes to help health care professionals and patients make treatment decisions rooted in the latest evidence.  “I know firsthand how devastating addiction is—not just for individuals, but for entire families and communities,” said HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. “Today’s FDA action is a long-overdue step toward restoring honesty, accountability, and transparency to a system that betrayed the American people.”
    FDA has required an additional prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial to directly examine the benefits and risks of long-term opioid use. The Agency will be closely monitoring the progress of this clinical trial to ensure its timely completion.
    The labeling changes will include the following updates:    

    Clearer Risk Information: A summary of study results showing the estimated risks of addiction, misuse, and overdose during long-term use. 
    Dosing Warnings: Stronger warnings that higher doses come with greater risks, and that those risks remain over time. 
    Clarified Use Limits: Removing language which could be misinterpreted to support using opioid pain medications over indefinitely long duration 
    Treatment Guidance: Labels will reinforce that long-acting or extended-release opioids should only be considered when other treatments, including shorter-acting opioids, are inadequate. 
    Safe Discontinuation: A reminder not to stop opioids suddenly in patients who may be physically dependent, as it can cause serious harm. 
    Overdose Reversal Agents: Additional information on medicines that can reverse an opioid overdose. 
    Drug Interactions: Enhanced warning about combining opioids with other drugs that slow down the nervous system—now including gabapentinoids. 
    More Risks with Overdose: New information about toxic leukoencephalopathy—a serious brain condition that may occur after an overdose. 
    Digestive Health: Updates about opioid-related problems with the esophagus.  

    The FDA sent letters to the relevant applicants outlining the required changes. The companies will have 30 days to submit their labeling updates to the FDA for review.
    More information is available in the FDA’s Drug Safety Communication.

    Consumer:888-INFO-FDA

    ###

    Boilerplate

    The FDA, an agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, protects the public health by assuring the safety, effectiveness, and security of human and veterinary drugs, vaccines and other biological products for human use, and medical devices. The agency also is responsible for the safety and security of our nation’s food supply, cosmetics, dietary supplements, radiation-emitting electronic products, and for regulating tobacco products.

    Content current as of:
    07/31/2025

    Follow FDA

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI: 1-Hour Payday Loans No Credit Check: GreendayOnline Expands Digital Services to Serve 32 States Where Traditional Lending Remains Legal

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)


    Digital lending platform addresses growing demand for accessible emergency funding across expanded geographic footprint

    Dallas, Texas , July 31, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — GreendayOnline, a leading digital lending platform, today announced the expansion of its services to 32 states where payday loan regulations permit 1-hour payday loans no credit check operations. This strategic geographic expansion positions GreendayOnline as a comprehensive solution for borrowers searching for “loans no credit check”, “instant approval”, and “online same day” funding options across a broader regional footprint.

    The expansion comes as search volume data reveals unprecedented demand for emergency lending solutions, with queries like “hour payday loans”, “payday loan no credit check”, and “loans online no credit check” experiencing significant increases across GreendayOnline‘s target markets. Industry analysis shows that over 12 million Americans annually seek short-term lending solutions, yet geographic limitations have historically restricted access to legitimate direct lender services. GreendayOnline now serves borrowers seeking online no credit check instant loan for bad credit solutions with streamlined digital processes.

    What Are 1-Hour Payday Loans No Credit Check and How GreendayOnline Delivers Fast Approval

    When financial emergencies strike, millions of Americans turn to search engines with desperate queries: “1 hour payday loans”, “bad credit” solutions, and “guaranteed approval direct lender” services. Behind every search for “payday loans online no credit check” lies a pressing financial need that traditional banking cannot address within the required timeframe.

    Understanding One Hour Payday Loans with Instant Approval Mechanism

    GreendayOnline’s 1-hour payday loans represent a streamlined approach to emergency lending that prioritizes speed without sacrificing borrower protection. Unlike traditional banking products that can take days or weeks for approval, GreendayOnline’s platform delivers decisions within minutes and funding within an hour of completed applications. The platform specializes in loan no credit check direct services that eliminate traditional banking barriers.

    The company’s instant approval process evaluates multiple data points beyond traditional credit metrics:

    1. Income verification through bank account analysis
    2. Employment stability assessment
    3. Debt-to-income ratio calculations
    4. Previous lending history evaluation
    5. Real-time affordability analysis

    “The term ‘1 hour payday loans no credit check’ has become shorthand for accessible emergency lending,” explained Tarquin Nemec, GreendayOnline’s Public Relations officer. “Our platform transforms what was once a lengthy, bureaucratic process into a seamless digital experience that respects both urgency and responsibility.”

    How Loans No Credit Check Work Through GreendayOnline’s Direct Lender Network

    The concept of “loans with no credit check direct lender” often confuses borrowers who assume their credit score is irrelevant to the lending decision. GreendayOnline clarifies this misunderstanding by focusing on current income while maintaining responsible lending standards. The platform provides no check loans guaranteed approval direct lender connections for qualified applicants.

    GreendayOnline’s network of licensed direct lenders utilizes soft credit inquiries that leave borrowers’ credit scores unaffected. This approach allows the platform to assess creditworthiness without a hard credit pull while still maintaining due diligence standards required by state regulations.

    Credit Check vs Soft Credit Inquiry: Why Your Credit Score Remains Unaffected

    Traditional lending involves hard credit inquiries that can temporarily lower credit scores by 5-10 points. GreendayOnline’s soft credit approach means that borrowers searching for “credit check loans” or “payday loans with no credit” requirements can explore their options without damaging their credit profiles. The platform offers loans no credit check guaranteed approval through its streamlined verification process.

    The distinction matters significantly for borrowers with low credit scores who cannot afford additional credit damage. GreendayOnline’s no credit check methodology evaluates the ability to repay the loan through alternative data sources, ensuring responsible lending without traditional credit barriers.

    GreendayOnline’s Geographic Expansion Brings Online Payday Loans to 32 States

    The digital lending landscape has evolved dramatically, with online payday loans now representing over 60% of total market volume. GreendayOnline’s expansion to 32 states addresses a critical gap in market coverage, particularly for borrowers in underserved communities where traditional payday storefronts may be limited or non-existent.

    Traditional Payday Lending Locations vs GreendayOnline’s Digital Reach

    While approximately 13,700 traditional payday storefronts operate nationwide, geographic concentration leaves significant coverage gaps. GreendayOnline’s digital platform eliminates location barriers, providing consistent access to small payday loans online same day services regardless of physical proximity to lending locations.

    The company’s research reveals striking disparities in lending access:

    • Rural areas: 73% lack physical payday lending locations within 25 miles
    • Urban centers: Average of 2.3 storefronts per 10,000 residents
    • Suburban regions: Limited evening and weekend availability
    • Digital platforms: 24/7 accessibility with consistent service standards

    State-by-State Analysis: Where Payday Loan No Credit Check Services Are Available

    GreendayOnline’s 32-state footprint covers regions where “payday loan no credit check” services remain legally permissible under current regulatory frameworks. This strategic geographic focus ensures compliance while maximizing borrower access to legitimate lending options. In California, the focus is on the famous 255 payday loans online, due to loan amount restrictions.

    Key expansion states include major population centers where demand for loans for bad credit in 2025 and short-term loans continues growing. Here is the full list in alphabetical order: Alabama, Alaska, California, Colorado, Delaware, Florida, Hawaii, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Nevada, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington, Wisconsin, and Wyoming.

    The company’s analysis shows particular opportunity in states where existing options remain limited despite legal permissibility.

    How GreendayOnline Serves Underbanked Communities Through Online Same Day Access

    Underbanked populations—estimated at 63 million Americans—face particular challenges accessing emergency credit. Search patterns reveal these communities frequently search for “payday loans online guaranteed approval”, “loans guaranteed approval”, and “instant payday loans online guaranteed” options as traditional banking relationships prove inadequate for urgent financial needs.

    GreendayOnline’s entirely online platform removes common barriers that underbanked consumers face:

    1. No physical branch visits required
    2. Minimal documentation through digital verification
    3. Bank account integration for streamlined processing
    4. Mobile-optimized application experience
    5. Multiple communication channels for customer support

    1 Hour Payday Loans Online: GreendayOnline’s Application and Approval

    The promise of 1 hour payday loans online requires sophisticated technology infrastructure capable of processing applications, verifying information, and disbursing funds within compressed timeframes. GreendayOnline’s platform architecture supports this commitment through automated decision-making and real-time bank integration. The platform offers credit payday loans with 1-hour processing for urgent financial needs.

    Completing a Secure Online Form for Loans Online No Credit Check

    GreendayOnline’s application process begins with completing a secure online form designed for maximum efficiency and security. The platform’s streamlined interface collects essential information while minimizing borrower effort and completion time.

    The application captures key data points necessary to evaluate loans online no credit check:

    • Personal identification information
    • Employment and income verification
    • Bank account details for funding and repayment
    • Contact information for communication
    • Loan amount and preferred terms

    Advanced encryption protects all submitted information, ensuring that borrowers’ financial data remains secure throughout the approval procedure. The platform’s mobile-responsive design accommodates borrowers who prefer smartphone applications over desktop interfaces.

    Income Rather Than Credit History: GreendayOnline’s Alternative Assessment Method

    GreendayOnline’s underwriting philosophy prioritizes income rather than credit history when evaluating loan approval decisions. This approach recognizes that credit scores may not accurately reflect current financial capacity, particularly for borrowers who have experienced temporary financial disruptions. The platform provides services that focus on current financial ability rather than past credit issues.

    The platform’s alternative assessment methodology examines:

    • Current monthly income stability
    • Bank account transaction patterns
    • Employment verification through multiple data sources
    • Existing debt obligations and payment history
    • Cash flow analysis for repayment capacity

    This comprehensive evaluation enables GreendayOnline to serve borrowers who might struggle with credit check payday loans from traditional lenders offering no credit check while maintaining responsible lending standards.

    From Application to Account Within an Hour: The GreendayOnline Timeline

    GreendayOnline’s commitment to “account within an hour” funding reflects significant technology investment in automated processing and real-time financial institution integration. The typical timeline progresses as follows:

    0-5 minutes: Application submission and initial verification 5-15 minutes: Income rather than credit assessment and underwriting review 15-30 minutes: Loan approval notification and terms confirmation 30-60 minutes: Fund disbursement to borrower’s designated account

    This accelerated timeline addresses the urgent nature of most 1 hour payday loans requests while ensuring thorough evaluation of each application.

    Payday Loans Online No Credit Check: Loan Options and Terms Through GreendayOnline

    GreendayOnline’s payday loans online no credit check offerings encompass multiple product variations designed to accommodate diverse borrower needs and financial circumstances. The platform’s loan options reflect both market demand and regulatory requirements across its 32-state operating region.

    Loan Amounts and Repayment Terms for 1 Hour Payday Loans No Credit

    Loan amounts available through GreendayOnline’s platform range from $100 to $1,000, with specific limits varying by state regulation and individual borrower qualification. The company’s “hour payday loans no credit” products feature flexible repayment structures designed to align with borrowers’ pay cycles.

    Standard loan terms include:

    • Repayment periods: 14-30 days based on borrower preference
    • Extension options: Available in states where legally permitted
    • Early repayment: No prepayment penalties
    • Automatic renewal: Optional with explicit borrower consent
    • Payment scheduling: Aligned with pay day cycles when possible

    The platform ensures that loans due dates are clearly communicated and aligned with borrower income schedules to minimize payment conflicts.

    Understanding APR and Loan Terms for Payday Loans with No Credit Requirements

    Transparency in loan terms represents a cornerstone of GreendayOnline’s approach to payday loans with no credit requirements. The platform provides clear APR calculations and fee structures before borrowers commit to any loan agreement.

    GreendayOnline’s fee structure adheres to state regulatory maximums while offering payday loans online with no credit check with a competitive marketplace. Borrowers receive detailed breakdowns of all costs associated with their payday lending experience, including:

    1. Principal loan amount
    2. Finance charges and fees
    3. Total repayment amount
    4. Effective APR calculation
    5. Payment due dates and methods

    Multiple Loan Offers vs Single Direct Lender: GreendayOnline’s Approach

    Unlike platforms that provide multiple loan offers from various lenders, GreendayOnline operates as a direct lender platform, streamlining the borrowing experience and eliminating confusion over varying terms and conditions. This approach ensures consistent service standards and simplified communication throughout the lending relationship.

    Bad Credit and Personal Loan Alternatives: How GreendayOnline Serves All Credit Types

    The intersection of bad credit and emergency lending needs creates particular challenges for borrowers who face rejection from traditional personal loan providers. GreendayOnline’s inclusive approach recognizes that financial history may not reflect current financial stability or repayment capacity.

    Loans for Bad Credit: GreendayOnline’s No Hard Credit Pull Policy

    GreendayOnline’s loans for bad credit methodology eliminates the anxiety many borrowers experience when applying for emergency funding. The platform’s no hard credit pull policy ensures that application inquiries do not involve a hard credit check that could further damage struggling credit profiles.

    This approach particularly benefits borrowers who have experienced:

    • Recent financial hardships affecting credit scores
    • Medical debt or unexpected emergency expenses
    • Employment disruptions or income reductions
    • Limited credit history or “thin file” credit profiles
    • Previous payday lending experiences

    Short-Term Loans vs Personal Loan Options for Low Credit Borrowers

    While personal loan products typically require extensive credit evaluation and longer approval timeframes, GreendayOnline’s short-term loans provide immediate access to emergency funding for borrowers with low credit scores. The platform’s products bridge the gap between expensive credit card advances and traditional installment lending.

    Short-term loan advantages include:

    • Faster approval and funding timelines
    • Lower qualification requirements
    • No collateral or cosigner requirements
    • Flexible repayment scheduling
    • Minimal impact on existing credit relationships

    Why Credit History Doesn’t Determine Loan Approval with GreendayOnline

    GreendayOnline’s underwriting philosophy recognizes that credit history represents past financial behavior rather than current repayment capacity. The platform’s alternative evaluation methods focus on real-time financial indicators that better predict successful loan repayment.

    Key evaluation factors beyond credit scores include:

    1. Current employment status and income stability
    2. Bank account activity and cash flow patterns
    3. Existing debt obligations and payment history
    4. Length of banking relationship and account management
    5. Geographic and demographic risk factors

    Instant Payday Loans Online Guaranteed Approval: GreendayOnline’s Direct Lender Network

    The concept of guaranteed approval in lending requires careful interpretation, as responsible lenders must maintain underwriting standards while maximizing approval rates. GreendayOnline’s approach to “instant payday loans online guaranteed approval” balances accessibility with prudent risk management.

    Guaranteed Approval Direct Lender Services vs Traditional Banking

    While no legitimate lender can offer truly guaranteed approval without any qualification requirements, GreendayOnline’s “guaranteed approval direct lender” approach maximizes approval rates through flexible underwriting criteria and alternative data evaluation methods.

    The platform’s approval rates significantly exceed traditional banking standards:

    • GreendayOnline approval rate: 89% for qualified applicants
    • Traditional bank personal loans: 23-31% approval rates
    • Credit union emergency loans: 45-52% approval rates
    • Credit card cash advances: 67% approval for existing cardholders

    Payday Loans Online Guaranteed Approval Process Through Licensed Lenders

    GreendayOnline’s “payday loans online guaranteed approval” process operates exclusively through licensed direct lenders compliant with state and federal regulations. This commitment ensures borrower protection while maintaining the accessibility that emergency lending requires.

    The platform’s network of lenders offering payday loans undergoes rigorous vetting to ensure:

    • Full licensing compliance in all operating states
    • Adherence to maximum fee and rate regulations
    • Transparent disclosure of all loan terms and conditions
    • Proper data security and privacy protections
    • Responsive customer service and dispute resolution

    How GreendayOnline Connects Borrowers with Licensed Direct Lenders

    GreendayOnline’s role as a connector between borrowers seeking “loans guaranteed approval direct lender” services and qualified lending partners streamlines the emergency funding process. The platform’s technology matches borrower profiles with appropriate offers based on qualification criteria and funding requirements.

    Online Loans No Credit Check: GreendayOnline’s Technology and Market Position

    As the digital lending landscape continues evolving, GreendayOnline’s position in the market, dedicated to online loans with no credit check, reflects both technological sophistication and market understanding. The platform’s expansion to 32 states positions it as a significant player in the estimated $35 billion annual payday lending market.

    Lenders Offering 1 Hour Payday Loans Through GreendayOnline’s Platform

    GreendayOnline’s network of lenders offering 1 hour payday loans represents carefully vetted financial institutions committed to responsible lending practices and rapid decision-making. The platform’s technology enables lenders through a secure online portal to access borrower applications and make real-time lending decisions.

    Partner lender qualifications include:

    • State licensing for payday lending operations
    • Minimum capitalization requirements for lending volume
    • Technology integration capabilities for real-time processing
    • Customer service standards meeting platform requirements
    • Compliance monitoring and reporting capabilities

    Credit Check Loans Guaranteed Approval vs No Credit Check Options

    The distinction between “credit check loans guaranteed approval” and true no credit check lending affects borrower experience and approval outcomes. GreendayOnline’s approach utilizes soft credit inquiries that provide lenders with credit information without a hard credit pull, affecting borrower credit scores.

    This hybrid methodology enables the platform to offer no credit check loans with guaranteed approval rates approaching true no credit check lending while maintaining responsible underwriting standards required by state regulations.

    Next Payday Funding: How GreendayOnline Ensures Timely Loan Processing

    GreendayOnline’s commitment to next payday funding timelines requires sophisticated coordination between application processing, underwriting decisions, and fund disbursement systems. The platform’s technology infrastructure supports same-day funding for applications approved before daily cutoff times.

    The company’s “repay the loan” scheduling system automatically aligns with borrower pay cycles when possible, reducing the likelihood of payment timing conflicts that could result in additional fees or credit inquiry impacts.

    About GreendayOnline

    GreendayOnline operates as a leading digital lending platform specializing in 1-hour payday loans no credit check services across 32 states where such lending remains legally permissible. The company’s technology-driven approach to offering no credit check loans serves borrowers who require fast access to emergency funding while maintaining responsible lending standards and regulatory compliance.

    For more information about GreendayOnline’s “loan no credit check options” and expanded geographic availability, visit https://greendayonline.com/ or contact the company’s customer service team.

    Media Contact:
    Tarquin Nemec
    GreendayOnline Public Relations Phone: (800) 424-2789
    Email: tarquin.nemec@greendayonline.com

    This press release contains forward-looking statements regarding GreendayOnline’s expansion plans and market position. Actual results may differ from those projected. Lending decisions are subject to state regulations and individual borrower qualification. All loan products are subject to regulatory approval and may not be available in all states.

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI: Announcing Avery Prendergast’s Participation in the Successful Farmers of Salem Internship Program

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    WILMINGTON, Del., July 31, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Farmers of Salem (FOS), a regional mutual insurance company specializing in insurance for home and business owners, is pleased to announce Avery Prendergast’s successful participation in their internship program. Graduating from Levittown’s Neshaminy High School, Ms. Prendergast is completing a degree in both Legal Studies and Risk Management & Insurance with Temple University of Philadelphia. She is looking forward to a December 2025 graduation. When asked how her interest in RMI came about, Avery said, “I became interested in RMI when I took the Introduction to Risk Management class at Temple. It reminded me of torts, which was something I had studied at Bucks County Community College while in the Paralegal program. It mixed well with my Legal Studies major, so I decided to take both majors.”

    Of the Intern Delaware program, Ms. Prendergast said, “ID has introduced me to industries, and people that I would never have gotten the opportunity to meet. It is a great program that shows you how easy it is to get involved and get things done in this wonderful state. ID has provided unique opportunities like visiting Legislative Hall, meeting past and present senators, networking with other interns in a variety of industries, and learning from senior executives and other professionals firsthand.” With only one more semester left, Avery is excited to settle into a career and is making the most out of her summer with Farmers. In her free time, she enjoys reading novels, watching movies with friends, and camping with her family.

    When asked “Why Farmers?”, Ms. Prendergast said, “I have had an amazing time working at Farmers of Salem this summer. Transitioning from working retail and being a student, to working a 9-5 was daunting, but everyone was so welcoming and kind that it became an easier process. FOS has a great environment where my voice matters. I am seen as a person and not just an employee. I have been tasked with real projects and work that make each day feel productive and meaningful.” Avery added, “With the rotational internship, I have been able to go through multiple departments and learn the ins and outs of the business. There have been so many lightbulb moments when I am learning something new and connecting the dots to something else in another department. I have learned so much that will help me with my final college courses and my future career.”

    Temple University uniquely hosts Actuarial Science and Risk Management & Insurance degree programs. Dr. Drennan, Chair of Risk, Actuarial Science, and Legal Studies at Temple University, along with his team, challenge students through thought-provoking course work while setting the bar quite high. 

    Elizabeth Dean, Human Resources Director for Farmers of Salem said, “The difference with Farmers of Salem’s internship program, compared to other insurance companies, is that we ask interns to roll up their sleeves and get to work alongside our tenured team members. This job-shadowing approach has allowed interns to gain first-hand experiences as they rotate through the various departments of the organization. Our employees enjoy mentoring the interns, not only to share their knowledge, but to learn from interns that have been so well prepared by Temple.” Added by Jim Reagan, CPCU, Vice President Product & Regulatory Compliance, “Asking our interns to get down to business and work alongside our valued employees is precisely what sets our internship experience apart. This process has been validated by our intern feedback.”

    About Farmers of Salem
    Founded in 1851, and located on the Riverfront in Wilmington DE, Farmers of Salem provides insurance coverage to homeowners and businesses in New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, and Maryland through a network of independent agents. Rated A- Excellent by A.M. Best Company and a Financial Stability Rating of A Exceptional by Demotech, Inc. “We pride ourselves in providing Superior Service with Personal Attention,” says Kim Lorenzini, Vice President, Marketing & Business Development.

    For more information about Farmers of Salem, visit www.farmersofsalem.com

    As a mutual corporation, fundamentally rooted in serving our community, we engage in corporate philanthropy, giving annually to an array of organizations and causes. Through our giving, in local markets where we have a presence, Farmers of Salem has supported educational development, physical education, and health and wellness programs that provide communities in most need with essential services, opportunities to improve the quality of their lives and provide them with assets to create a better future.

    A partial list of events and organizations that Farmers of Salem supports annually:

    • Autism Delaware
    • Serviam Girls Academy
    • Vehicles for Veterans
    • Salem County Humane Society
    • Habitat for Humanity
    • VFW Post #253
    • Operation Legacy
    • Keeping Hope Alive, Inc.
    • Temple University 
    • Girl Scouts and Boy Scouts
    • Holiday Service Project – Thanksgiving Food Baskets – Salvation Army
    • Make A Wish
    • American Red Cross
    • American Cancer Society
    • Longwood Gardens
    • Bo Lends a Paw Pet Pantry
    Contact: Kim Lorenzini
      856-628-0150
      klorenzini@fosnj.com
     

    A photo accompanying this announcement is available at https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/0d1f5ccc-9a93-4259-b449-b63c5eb4f69a

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI Economics: Services trade growth slows in first quarter of 2025

    Source: World Trade Organization

    Services exports in Europe and North America increased by only 3% year-on-year in the first quarter of 2025, down from 8% and 11% respectively in the first quarter of 2024. In contrast, strong growth was sustained in Asia at 9%.

    The overall slowdown in services trade was mainly due to “Other commercial services,” a category that encompasses a wide variety of mostly digitally deliverable services ranging from financial to professional services (Chart 1). In 2024, “Other commercial services” accounted for some 60% of global services trade, with Europe contributing 40% of those exports (Chart 2).

    Chart 1: Commercial services trade growth by main sector, 2024Q1-2025Q1
    Year-on-year % change

    Note: Services trade measured as exports.
    Source: WTO-UNCTAD estimates.

    Chart 2: Structure of world exports of commercial services, 2024
    % shares

    Source: WTO-UNCTAD estimates.

    Chart 3 shows a deceleration across selected subsectors of “Other commercial services” in the first quarter of 2025 compared with the same period of 2024. Growth in “Other business services,” covering various professional, technical and trade-related services, as well as research and development services, moderated. The United States posted a subdued 4% year-on-year increase in “Other business services” following an 8% expansion in the same period of 2024. Exports by the European Union remained flat in US dollar terms, although they rose by 4% when measured in euros.

    Financial services exports grew by only 3% year-on-year in the first quarter of 2025, reflecting reduced investment activity amid increased global economic uncertainty. The sector was also affected by exchange rate movements, which dampened US dollar-denominated growth. Exports from both the European Union and the United States rose just 2% year-on-year while Switzerland’s exports fell by 3%. The United Kingdom, on the contrary, posted a robust 10% year-on-year increase sustained by double digit growth in exports to the United States (+13%).

    Intellectual property related services expanded by 4% year-on-year in the first three months of 2025 in comparison with a 7% growth in the same quarter of 2024. Global trade in IP-related services remains highly concentrated, with the European Union and the United States accounting for nearly 70% of exports in 2024. EU exports, measured in US dollars, rose by just 3% year-on-year, held back by exchange rate volatility, despite stronger underlying growth of 6% in euro terms.

    Global construction exports fell by 15% year-on-year in the first quarter of 2025, reversing part of the strong 25% growth recorded during the same period in 2024. The decline reflects weaker performance across several key economies, including China (-25%), which alone accounted for over 28% of global construction exports in 2024, the Republic of Korea (-15%), and the European Union (-6%). The downturn in the first quarter likely reflects delayed investment due to uncertainty and rising costs.

    Computer services exports were only marginally affected by the broader slowdown, as strong global demand for artificial intelligence (AI), digital transformation, and cybersecurity solutions continued to drive growth. This momentum is expected to persist, supported by ongoing business adaptation to new technologies and rising consumer preferences for digital services. During the period, India’s computer services exports grew by 13%, while Ireland recorded a 9% increase.

    Chart 3: Other commercial services exports by selected subsector, 2024 and Q1 2025
    Year-on-year % change

    Note: Sectors are ranked according to their relative share in services trade in 2024.
    Source: WTO estimates for Q1 2025 and Q1 2024; WTO-UNCTAD estimates for 2024.

     As for the other main sectors of commercial services, global transport exports were up 3% year-on-year in the first quarter of 2025, following rapid growth especially in the third and fourth quarter of 2024 due to frontloading. Asia recorded the fastest growth, up 10%, driven by a 31% rise in China, while Singapore and the Republic of Korea posted modest gains of 2%. Payments for shipping services increased by 19% in South and Central America and the Caribbean, as demand for goods surged.

    Despite a difficult economic and geopolitical context, international travel expanded by 5% year-on-year in the first quarter of 2025. For the first time since the pandemic, international tourist arrivals were 3% above 2019 levels according to UN Tourism data. In Asia, travel receipts grew by 13%, driven by China (+96%), Viet Nam (+33%), Japan (+25%) and Thailand (+18%) as tourism continues to recover in the region. By contrast, North America’s travel receipts fell by 1%.

    Services trade performance varied across major traders in the first five months of 2025 according to available monthly statistics. Double digit exports growth was recorded in Asian economies such as China (+13%, through June), India (+12%) and Japan (+11%). In North America, the United States and Canada saw diverging trends. US service exports rose by 5%, while Canada recorded a 6% decline. The EU’s service exports to non-member countries rose by 3%, while imports from outside the Union grew more sharply, increasing by 6%. The United Kingdom recorded marked growth, with exports up 9% and imports rising by 13%.

    Chart 4: Services export and import growth of selected economies, January-May 2025
    Year-on-year % change

    Note: Statistics for Brazil, China and Pakistan refer to January-June.
    Source : National sources and Eurostat.

    Quarterly statistics are estimates as of time of publication and subject to frequent revisions. They are available for download at WTO Stats, as well as monthly statistics. Annual services trade data and related visualizations can be accessed at WTO | Statistics — Global Services Trade Data Hub and WTO | World Trade Statistics 2024.

    Share

    MIL OSI Economics

  • MIL-OSI Economics: ‘STEM for ALL’ : Thales Joins the Singapore-Industry Scholarship (SgIS) Programme

    Source: Thales Group

    Headline: ‘STEM for ALL’ : Thales Joins the Singapore-Industry Scholarship (SgIS) Programme

    • As a Sponsoring Organisation with SgIS, Thales will provide Singaporean undergraduate students scholarships in a comprehensive programme that includes internship, mentoring and a starting career with Thales.
    • With this initiative, Thales is extending its ‘STEM for ALL’ programme to Singapore, the first launch outside Europe, with its dedicated mission to advance STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Math) education amongst youth.
    • In its inaugural intake, four nominated scholars will undertake engineering or research roles in strategic sectors including air traffic management, public security, cybersecurity and digital identity, working within Thales businesses and research labs like the Thales Digital Factory.
    © Thales

    With engineers comprising one-third of Thales Singapore’s 2000+ employees, the Group has a strong interest in promoting STEM education and growing the next generation of engineering talent. On 29thJuly, Thales was proud to join SgIS as a Sponsorship Organisation at its launch event and to present awards to the scholars, aligning with the government’s mandate to develop young talent in Singapore’s strategic sectors.

    Established in 2012, SgIS is an initiative which partners government and industries to nurture a strong core of Singaporean talent in 16 strategic industries which include Aerospace & Aviation and Engineering. It is the only government-led, multi-industry scholarship under the Ministry of Education which provides talented Singaporean students access to close to 150 Sponsoring Organisations, giving them development opportunities as they further their studies and begin their professional careers.

    Throughout May and June, over 100 potential candidates with diverse skillsets were introduced to Thales by SgIS and invited to an Open Day to get to know Thales’ businesses. From this, over 40 were taken through rigorous technical assessments, following which 12 were further shortlisted for panel interviews with Thales experts and business leaders to further assess their technical expertise and leadership attributes.

    Four talented candidates from the Nanyang Technological University (NTU), the Singapore Institute of Technology (SIT) and the Singapore University of Technology and Design (SUTD) were the final recipients of the Thales award. Currently at different stages in their university education, the four students will progressively join the cybersecurity and digital identity, public security, air traffic management and Thales Digital Factory teams over the next 2 years.

    Expanding the Thales Group’s STEM for ALL Programme to Singapore

    In early 2025, Thales, through its endowment fund Thales Solidarity, launched its STEM for ALL programme in France and Belgium to foster vocation in scientific fields to remarkable young students.

    By partnering the SgIS programme, Thales is extending the Group’s ambition in endorsing STEM education worldwide by reinforcing academic excellence. Singapore is the first country outside of Europe to have a STEM scholarship programme under the STEM for ALL umbrella.

    “Thales recognises the essential role that science and technology play in furthering human progress and creating a world that is safer, greener and more sustainable. Many of the younger generation are passionate about making an impact and we are constantly looking for talented individuals, skilled in STEM, to help bring this ambition to life.” said Emily TAN, Country Director & Chief Executive, Thales in Singapore. “The scholars we selected have strong technical skills which we hope to nurture when they join the Thales family. I believe that their enthusiasm to learn, coupled with the mentorship opportunities and experiences within Thales, will provide a good starting point for their careers.”

    About Thales

    Thales (Euronext Paris: HO) is a global leader in advanced technologies for the Defence, Aerospace, and Cyber & Digital sectors. Its portfolio of innovative products and services addresses several major challenges: sovereignty, security, sustainability and inclusion.

    The Group invests more than €4 billion per year in Research & Development in key areas, particularly for critical environments, such as Artificial Intelligence, cybersecurity, quantum and cloud technologies.

    Thales has more than 83,000 employees in 68 countries. In 2024, the Group generated sales of €20.6 billion.

    About Thales in Singapore

    Thales established its presence in Singapore in 1973 to support the growth of aerospace activities in Asia. Since then, it has grown to be a leading deep-tech company operating in the Aeronautics (including avionics and air traffic management), Defence, Public Security, Cybersecurity & Digital Identity sectors.

    Thales in Singapore runs global industrial operations for avionics and digital identity solutions and has a strong commitment to Research, Technology and Innovation, with Centres of Excellence for radars, naval drones, space, avionics, public security and defence. With over 2000 employees across four locations, Thales is actively supporting Singapore in driving its digital transformation and Smart Nation ambitions.

    MIL OSI Economics

  • MIL-OSI USA: Fischer, Cortez Masto Introduce MAP for Broadband Funding Act

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Nebraska Deb Fischer

    Provides fresh oversight over FCC’s Broadband Funding Map, originally created by Fischer, Cortez Masto

    Today, U.S. Senators Deb Fischer (R-Neb.) and Catherine Cortez Masto (D-Nev.) introduced the Modernization, Accountability, and Planning (MAP) for Broadband Funding Act, to provide oversight of the Federal Communication Commission’s (FCC) Broadband Funding Map to ensure it is functioning effectively for the public, federal agencies, and broadband providers.

    Fischer and Cortez Masto originally created the Broadband Funding Map as part of the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law. With oversight needed to ensure federal agencies are utilizing the Map to its full potential, the MAP For Broadway Funding Act will ensure that these agencies are reliably reporting their funding data to the FCC.

    “I have worked diligently for years to close the digital divide for unserved and underserved communities. My work with Senator Cortez Masto was underscored by the Broadband Funding Map, which we created in 2021. While I’m pleased the FCC launched the Map in 2023, it is clear oversight is needed here to ensure all federal agencies are utilizing the Map to its full potential. I won’t relent in my efforts to expand Internet connectivity for those who lack access—this is a critical step in that mission,”
     Fischer said. 

    “As we work to expand broadband access across the country, it’s critical that we do with as much transparency, accountability, and coordination as possible. Reliable access to the internet is already so important for people to work and take care of their everyday tasks. Congress must ensure we continue to expand its access efficiently,” Cortez Masto said.

    “Big thanks to Senators Fischer and Cortez Masto for their work in bringing about the MAP for Broadband Funding Act. By improving the accuracy and transparency of the Broadband Funding Map, we can more effectively target federal funding for broadband deployment where it’s truly needed. Plus, requiring federal agencies to report broadband deployment data to the FCC and NTIA will strengthen coordination and accountability across programs,” USTelecom President and CEO Jonathan Spalter said. 

    “Senator Fischer should be commended for marshaling the Federal Communications Commission and the Government Accountability Office to ensure that precious federal broadband dollars are spent as efficiently as possible. CostQuest appreciates the Senator’s data-driven approach to ensuring accountability for broadband spending across the government,”CostQuest Associates said.

    Background
    :

    The MAP for Broadband Funding Act provides fresh oversight for the FCC’s Broadband Funding Map to ensure the Map is functioning effectively, efficiently, and transparently as possible for the public, federal agencies, and broadband providers alike.

    To meet this goal, the bill:
     

    1. Directs the FCC to conduct a Notice of Inquiry on the Map’s function and data it displays for maximum usability, assessing any necessary updates from a user-experience perspective, and 
    1. Directs the Government Accountability Office (GAO) to evaluate how well federal agencies are populating the Map in compliance with current law, identifying any gaps in reporting for its optimum functionality. 

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Rosen, Cornyn Introduce Bill to Lower Out-of-Pocket Prescription Drug Costs for Seniors

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator Jacky Rosen (D-NV)

    WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, U.S. Senators Jacky Rosen (D-NV) and John Cornyn (R-TX) introduced a bipartisan bill to reduce prescription drug costs for seniors. The Reducing Drug Prices for Seniors Act would directly reduce out-of-pocket costs by requiring that coinsurance payments for prescription drugs for seniors on Medicare be determined based on the lower net price of the medication as opposed to the higher list price.
    For example, if a senior has a 50 percent coinsurance and their medication’s list price is $200, they currently pay $100 out-of-pocket at the pharmacy – even if the insurance company only paid $150 for the medication. This bipartisan legislation would ensure that, in this example, the senior ends up only paying $75.
    “For far too long, Nevadans have been forced to pay extremely high prices for prescription drugs, and I believe no one should have to break the bank to pay for life-saving medication,” said Senator Rosen. “That’s why I’m introducing a bipartisan bill to lower out-of-pocket costs for prescription drugs for Nevada seniors and reduce the amount of money they have to pay at the pharmacy counter. I’ll keep working with anyone – Republican, Democrat, or Independent – to bring down costs for families in our state.”
    “Countless seniors in Texas face challenges with high out-of-pocket prescription drug costs,” said Senator Cornyn. “I am proud to support the Reducing Drug Prices for Seniors Act, which aims to ease this financial burden by lowering costs and improving access to potentially life-saving medications.”
    Senator Rosen has been actively working to lower health care and prescription drug costs for families. She helped pass the bill that gave Medicare the power to negotiate for lower prescription drugs and cap the price of insulin at $35 a month. At the beginning of this year, Senator Rosen announced the start of a cap on prescription drug prices for Nevada seniors that she helped pass. She also announced that more medications now qualify for Medicare price negotiations. 

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: RIDOH and DEM Recommend Avoiding Contact with Georgiaville Pond

    Source: US State of Rhode Island

    The Rhode Island Department of Health (RIDOH) and Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management (DEM) are recommending people avoid contact with Georgiaville Pond in Smithfield due to a confirmed cyanobacteria bloom. Cyanobacteria, also known as blue-green algae, are naturally present in bodies of water, but under certain environmental conditions will form harmful algae blooms?(HABs). All recreation, including swimming, fishing, boating and kayaking, is high risk to health and recommended to be avoided at this location. HABs can produce toxins which can be harmful to humans and animals.

    Use caution in all areas of Georgiaville Pond as cyanobacteria HABs can move locations in ponds and lakes. People should not drink untreated water or eat fish from affected waterbodies.?Pet owners should not allow pets to drink or swim in this water. ? Skin contact with water containing toxin-producing cyanobacteria can cause irritation of the skin, nose, eyes, and throat. Symptoms from ingestion of water can include stomachache, diarrhea, vomiting, and nausea. Less common symptoms can include dizziness, headache, fever, liver damage, and nervous system damage. Young children and pets are at higher risk for health effects associated with cyanobacteria HABs because they are more likely to swallow water when they are in or around bodies of water. People who have had contact with these ponds and experience those symptoms should contact their healthcare provider.?

    If you or your pet come into contact with a cyanobacteria HAB:

    – Rinse your skin with clean water right away.

    – Shower and wash your clothes when you get home.

    – If your pet was exposed, wash it with clean water immediately and don’t let it lick algae from its fur.

    – Call a vet if your pet shows signs of illness like tiredness, no eating, vomiting, diarrhea or other symptoms within a day.

    – If you feel sick after contact, call a healthcare provider.

    Affected waters might look bright to dark green, with thick algae floating on the surface. It may resemble green paint, pea soup, or green cottage cheese. If you see water like this, people and pets should avoid contact with the water.

    To report suspected cyanobacteria blooms, contact DEM’s Office of Water Resources at 401-222-4700 Press 6 or?DEM.OWRCyano@dem.ri.gov?and if possible, send a photograph of the reported algae bloom. For more information and the Freshwater Cyanobacteria Tracker Dashboard that lists current advisories and data, visit:?www.dem.ri.gov/bluegreen

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: “Free Money” Gang Members Indicted for Committing Murder at Local Shopping Center

    Source: US State of Vermont

    Two alleged members of Free Money, a violent Houston-based street gang, were indicted yesterday in the Southern District of Texas for their alleged roles in the murder of one individual and attempted murder of another during a gang-related ambush.

    According to court documents, Free Money members and associates engage in robbery, home invasions, drug distribution, and murder. The defendants, Terry Ardoin, 24, and Travonte Ardoin, 27, both of Houston, allegedly committed the murder in connection with an ongoing gang war with a rival group.

    On June 24, 2022, in broad daylight, surveillance footage captured the Ardoins following a Chevrolet Equinox into a shopping center parking lot in a Black Nissan Altima. As alleged in court documents, the driver of the Equinox entered a nearby store while the passenger remained in the vehicle. When the driver returned, the Ardoins allegedly exited the Altima wearing masks and opened fire on both individuals.

    Witnesses reported hearing numerous gunshots and described the distinct sound of a fully automatic weapon, believed to have been modified with a machine gun conversion device commonly referred to as a “switch.” 

    Multiple rounds struck the vehicle’s passenger compartment. Houston Police Department officers responded within minutes and found one victim deceased.

    Terry and Travonte Ardoin are charged with murder in aid of racketeering, attempted murder in aid of racketeering, use of a firearm in furtherance of a crime of violence and causing death through the use of a firearm. If convicted, they face a maximum penalty of life in prison or a death sentence. A federal district court judge will determine any sentence after considering the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and other statutory factors.

    The FBI conducted the investigation with the assistance of the Houston Police Department.

    Trial Attorney Ralph Paradiso of the Criminal Division’s Violent Crime and Racketeering Section (VCRS) and Assistant U.S. Attorney Benjamin Brown for the Southern District of Texas are prosecuting the case.

    This case is part of the Criminal Division’s Violent Crime Initiative to prosecute violent crimes in Houston. The Criminal Division and the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Texas have partnered, along with local, state, and federal law enforcement agencies, to confront violent crimes committed by gang members and associates through the enforcement of federal laws and use of federal resources to prosecute the violent offenders and prevent further violence.

    An indictment is merely an allegation. All defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Security: Two Men Charged For Nationwide Fraud Scheme Targeting Hundreds Of Elderly Victims

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

    Jingbin Jiang and Su Jian Liu Are Charged With Participating in a Scheme That Attempted to Steal Over $18 Million From Over 350 Victims

    United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, Jay Clayton; Assistant Director in Charge of the New York Field Office of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”), Christopher G. Raia; and Commissioner of the New York City Police Department (“NYPD”), Jessica S. Tisch,  announced charges against JINGBIN JIANG and SU JIAN LIU, a/k/a “Fatty,” a/k/a “Ah Pang,” for a scheme to defraud elderly victims across the United States, which attempted to steal over $18 million from over 350 victims and resulted in actual losses of over $5 million to over 70 victims.  JIANG was arrested in Staten Island this morning and will be presented today before U.S. Magistrate Judge Stewart D. Aaron.  LIU is still at large.  The case is assigned to U.S. District Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil.

    “As alleged, Jingbin Jiang and Su Jian Liu worked together with others to steal the hard-earned money of some our most vulnerable New Yorkers and others around the country,” said U.S. Attorney Jay Clayton.  “Taking advantage of our elderly after they have worked so hard to save and contributed so much to our city and this country is heartless and despicable.  These charges, and the efforts of the FBI and the NYPD, should serve as a warning to fraudsters and cybercriminals: New Yorkers want you held accountable for your crimes, and the women and men of our Office are committed to doing so.”

    “Jingbin Jiang and Su Jian Liu allegedly defrauded elderly victims of more than $5 million by utilizing extortionate tactics to coerce withdrawals of significant cash or purchases of gold,” said FBI Assistant Director Christopher G. Raia.  “This alleged conspiracy wielded fear of bankruptcy and arrest to ensure victims complied with the unlawful requests for money.  The FBI is committed to apprehending any individual who utilizes online platforms to target and exploit vulnerable victims across the country.”

    “These defendants allegedly led a nationwide fraud scheme with the goal of targeting innocent, elderly victims and stealing millions of their hard-earned savings,” said NYPD Commissioner Jessica S. Tisch.  “Jingbin Jiang and Su Jian Liu allegedly participated in a plot involving elaborate, fictitious narratives to manipulate elderly victims and trick them into participating in their scheme, which involved attempts to steal over $18 million from 350 people.  I am grateful to the members of the NYPD, FBI, and the U.S. Attorney’s Office for holding these alleged predatory fraudsters accountable.”

    According to the allegations in the Indictment unsealed today in Manhattan federal court:[1]

    Between at least in or about 2023 and in or about July 2025, JIANG and LIU participated with others in a fraudulent scheme that primarily targeted elderly victims located all across the United States, including in New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Massachusetts, Texas, Washington, Wisconsin, California, Connecticut, Arizona, North Carolina, South Carolina, Missouri, Mississippi, Kentucky, Utah, Oregon, Colorado, and Montana.

    The scheme proceeded in the following manner: First, victims would typically see a pop-up message on their computers indicating that they needed to call a particular phone number controlled by members of the scheme.  The pop-up message would typically claim to come from a technology company, a bank, or the government.  Second, when victims called the phone number, they were told a fictitious narrative that would ultimately lead to a suggestion that the victims withdraw money from their bank account.  For example, some victims were falsely told that their computers had a virus, or that their computers had been hacked into and used to commit serious crimes, like downloading child sexual abuse material.  Others were falsely told that their bank accounts had been compromised and were vulnerable to unauthorized withdrawals.  To avoid arrest or protect their bank accounts from being compromised, victims were instructed to withdraw large amounts of cash from their bank accounts or purchase large quantities of gold.  Some victims were even told that their money would be safely held in the custody of a consumer protection agency like the Federal Trade Commission, and they were sent notices on fake federal government letterhead purporting to bear the signature of a federal government official:

    Third, many victims were told that a courier would be arriving at their home (or other coordinated pick-up location) to retrieve the gold and/or cash.  Victims were often provided with the courier’s name (which was fictitious), a description of the courier’s clothing, and sometimes a password, purportedly to ensure the courier was authorized to pick up the gold and/or cash.  Other victims were told to purchase and transfer cryptocurrency or gift cards, which did not require a courier.  Victims were typically under the impression that this gold and/or cash would then be deposited, on the victims’ behalf, into a new, safe, uncompromised bank account (or with the Federal Trade Commission, as noted above) that they could access without concern in the future.  In reality, these funds were stolen and never returned to the victims.  Some victims engaged in multiple transactions before realizing the fraudulent nature of the scheme.

    JIANG and LIU participated in the scheme by managing and supervising the couriers that traveled to meet the victims to pick up the cash and gold, which was then transported back to New York City.  JIANG and LIU received information about potential victims from other members of the scheme on text-messaging platforms, in messages that typically included the zip codes and the amounts of cash or gold to be collected from each victim. JIANG and LIU could then decide whether to accept the pick-up, and if they did, the other members of the scheme would provide more specific details about the victim and when and where to pick up the cash or gold.  After arranging for couriers to make the pick-ups, JIANG and LIU would provide updates to other members of the scheme about the couriers’ progress.  After the victims provided the criminal proceeds to the couriers, JIANG and LIU arranged for the criminal proceeds to be distributed to other members of the scheme, including by converting cash and gold into cryptocurrency to be easily transmitted to members of the scheme located overseas, including in India and China.  In total, members of the conspiracy have attempted to steal at least approximately $18 million from over 350 victims, and they have successfully stolen at least approximately $5 million from over 70 victims.

    If you or someone you know has been victimized by this scheme, please file a complaint with the FBI’s Internet Crime Complaint Center, which is available at ic3.gov.

    *                *                *

    JIANG, 37, of Staten Island, New York, and LIU, 38 of Edmond, Oklahoma, are both charged with one count of wire fraud conspiracy, which carries a maximum sentence of 20 years in prison; and one count of conspiracy to commit interstate transportation of stolen property, which carries a maximum sentence of five years in prison.

    The maximum potential sentences in this case are prescribed by Congress and provided here for informational purposes only, as any sentencing of the defendants will be determined by the judge.

    Mr. Clayton praised the investigative work of the FBI and NYPD’s Joint Organized Crime Task Force.  Mr. Clayton also thanked the New York State Police and the Bedford Police Department for their assistance in the investigation of this case.

    This case is being handled by the Office’s Violent & Organized Crime Unit. Assistant U.S. Attorneys Andrew K. Chan and Angela Zhu are in charge of the prosecution. 

    The charges contained in the Indictment are merely accusations, and the defendants are presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.


    [1] As the introductory phrase signifies, the entirety of the text of the Indictment and the description of the Indictment set forth herein constitute only allegations, and every fact described herein should be treated as an allegation.

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Security: Previously Convicted Felon Sentenced for Possession of Pistol While on Pretrial Release

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

                WASHINGTON – Andre Jamar Turman, 34, of the District of Columbia, was sentenced today to 28 months in federal prison for being a previously convicted felon in possession of a loaded Haskell Model JS-45 pistol while he was on probation and on pretrial release for multiple cases, announced U.S. Attorney Jeanine Ferris Pirro.

                Turman pleaded guilty on Dec. 17, 2024, to the indictment charging him with unlawful possession of a firearm and ammunition by a felon. In addition to the 28-month prison term, U.S. District Court Judge Jia M. Cobb ordered Turman to serve three years of supervised release.

                Joining in the announcement were U.S. Marshal Robert Dixon of D.C. Superior Court, Special Agent in Charge Anthony Spotswood of the Washington Field Division of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, and Chief Pamela A. Smith of the Metropolitan Police Department (MPD)

                According to court documents, on May 4, 2023, Deputy U.S. Marshals and MPD detectives were searching for Turman due to numerous bench warrants out of D.C. Superior Court as well as an outstanding arrest warrant.

                At about 11:30 a.m., officers spotted and arrested Turman on the 2400 block of Pennsylvania Avenue, SE, near Twining Square Park. A Deputy U.S. Marshal patted down the right front pants pocket and recovered a loaded Haskell Model JS-45 pistol. The firearm was not registered in the District of Columbia. In addition, the firearm previously had been reported as stolen.

                Turman was prohibited from possessing a firearm because he had been previously convicted of carrying a pistol without a license and sentenced to more than a year in prison. 

                At the time of his arrest, he was on probation and pretrial release for multiple cases—including release in another firearm case in Maryland.

                This case was investigated by the ATF, MPD, and U.S. Marshals. It was prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorneys Shezhad Akhtar and Chrisellen Rebecca Kolb.

    23cr171

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Security: New Haven Man Sentenced to More than 6 Years in Federal Prison for Fentanyl Trafficking Offense

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

    David X. Sullivan, United States Attorney for the District of Connecticut, today announced that JESUS SEGUINOT, also known as “Chuchi,” 35, of New Haven, was sentenced yesterday by U.S. District Judge Stefan R. Underhill in Bridgeport to 78 months of imprisonment for his role in a fentanyl trafficking conspiracy.

    According to court documents and statements made in court, on June 25, 2020, Seguinot was sentenced in New Haven federal court to 30 months of imprisonment and three years of supervised release for drug distribution and gun possession offenses.  He was released from federal prison in May 2021.  In October 2021, the FBI’s Safe Streets Task Force learned that Luis Salaman, also known as “Bebe,” was distributing large quantities of narcotics throughout New Haven.  The investigation revealed that Salaman worked with Seguinot and others to distribute fentanyl.  Between November 2021 and March 2022, investigators made multiple controlled purchases of distribution quantities of fentanyl from Salaman, Seguinot, and their associates.  Investigators also learned that Seguinot possessed a firearm during that time.

    Seguinot was arrested on April 10, 2023.

    On December 19, 2024, a jury found Seguinot and Salaman guilty of conspiracy to distribute 40 grams or more of fentanyl, and Salaman guilty of three counts of possession with intent to distribute, and distribution of, 40 grams or more of fentanyl. 

    Seguinot’s criminal history also includes state convictions for drug distribution and weapon possession offenses.

    Seguinot has been detained since January 2, 2025.

    Salaman, who has been detained since his arrest on April 5, 2022, awaits sentencing.

    This investigation has been conducted by FBI’s Safe Streets Task Force, which includes members from the FBI, the Connecticut State Police, the Connecticut Department of Correction, and the New Haven, Milford, East Haven, West Haven, and Wallingford Police Departments.  The case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney David T. Huang.

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Security: Florida Woman to Pay $400,000 to Settle Allegations of Falsifying Diagnoses in connection with an Amherst Compounding Pharmacy

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

    CONCORD –Georgina Exposito of Florida, owner of 3rd Party Services of Florida, agreed to pay $400,000 to resolve allegations that they violated the False Claims Act (FCA) by submitting false claims to Medicare and TRICARE based on fake medical diagnoses, Acting U.S. Attorney Jay McCormack announces.

    According to the settlement agreement and the complaint in partial intervention, Exposito and her company altered patients’ medical diagnoses to obtain prior authorizations on behalf of pharmacies, including PerforMix Specialty Pharmacy, a compounding pharmacy located in Amherst. This resulted in the submission of false claims to Medicare and TRICARE.

    “Submitting false claims to federal health care programs like Medicare and TRICARE undermines the integrity of our health care system and diverts critical resources away from patients who need them,” said U.S. Attorney Jay McCormack. “Accountability in cases like this helps restore trust in our health care system and ensures taxpayer dollars are protected.”

    “The submission of falsified prior authorization requests undermines an important safeguard against unnecessary Medicare costs,” said Special Agent in Charge Roberto Coviello of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Inspector General (HHS-OIG).  “This settlement highlights HHS-OIG’s ongoing commitment to combatting fraud in the taxpayer-funded Medicare program, and we will continue to thoroughly pursue allegations of False Claims Act violations.”

    The False Claims Act permits whistleblowers to file civil lawsuits alleging that false claims have been submitted to the United States. This FCA settlement resolves allegations against Georgina Exposito’s company originally brought in a lawsuit filed by a whistleblower.  As part of the settlement the whistleblower will receive a portion of the settlement amount.

    The claims resolved by the settlement are allegations only, and there has been no determination of liability. The United States’ case against the other defendants named in the complaint in partial intervention continues. 

     This case was investigated by the Office of Inspector General of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Office of Inspector General of the Department of Defense, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation. The case is being handled by Assistant U.S. Attorney Raphael Katz.

    ###

     

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Security: “Free Money” gang members indicted for committing murder at local shopping center

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

    HOUSTON – Two alleged members of a violent Houston-based street gang have been charged for their alleged roles in the murder of one individual and attempted murder of another during a gang-related ambush.

    According to court documents, members and associates of the gang known as Free Money engage in robbery, home invasions, drug distribution and murder. Terry Ardoin, 24, and Travonte Ardoin, 27, both of Houston, allegedly committed the murder in connection with an ongoing gang war with a rival group.

    On June 24, 2022, in broad daylight, the Ardoins allegedly following a Chevrolet Equinox into a shopping center parking lot in a Black Nissan Altima. As alleged in court documents, the driver of the Equinox entered a nearby store while the passenger remained in the vehicle. When the driver returned, the Ardoins allegedly exited the Altima wearing masks and opened fired on both individuals.

    Multiple rounds struck the vehicle’s passenger compartment. Law enforcement responded within minutes and found one victim deceased.

    Terry and Travonte Ardoin are charged with murder in aid of racketeering, attempted murder in aid of racketeering, use of a firearm in furtherance of a crime of violence and causing death through the use of a firearm. If convicted, they face up to life in prison or the possibility of a death sentence.

    The FBI conducted the investigation with the assistance of Houston Police Department.

    Assistant U.S. Attorney Benjamin Brown is prosecuting the case along with Trial Attorney Ralph Paradiso of the Criminal Division’s Violent Crime and Racketeering Section.

    This case is part of the Criminal Division’s Violent Crime Initiative to prosecute violent crimes in Houston. The Criminal Division and the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Texas have partnered, along with local, state and federal law enforcement agencies, to confront violent crimes gang members and associates have committed through the enforcement of federal laws and use of federal resources to prosecute violent offenders and prevent further violence.

    An indictment is a formal accusation of criminal conduct, not evidence. A defendant is presumed innocent unless convicted through due process of law.

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Economics: Discover the potential of agentic AI in higher education

    Source: Microsoft

    Headline: Discover the potential of agentic AI in higher education

    Discover how Azure AI Foundry in education helps institutions build tailored, scalable AI solutions to drive innovation and digital transformation.

    At Microsoft Build 2025, we unveiled a new wave of agentic innovations that are reshaping how higher education institutions use AI. From intelligent agents to unified data platforms, these advancements empower higher education leaders to confidently accelerate digital transformation. A key part of this evolution is the role of Azure AI Foundry in education, which helps institutions build secure, scalable AI solutions tailored to their academic goals.

    With these advances in AI, institutions now have a powerful new opportunity: to use agents that can automate routine tasks, assist faculty and staff, and provide real-time, contextual insights to support teaching and learning. As more institutions begin their journey to this next frontier, AI agents will support individuals and teams by automating tasks and delivering instant, contextual insights.

    This means that with data-focused AI tools from Microsoft, your institution can:

    • Develop scalable, intelligent agents using Azure AI Foundry, trusted by enterprises and customized for higher education compliance and innovation.
    • Turn data insights into action with AI-powered analytics, addressing challenges in student success, research productivity, and operational agility.

    Accelerate agentic AI with Azure AI Foundry

    Azure AI Foundry Agent Service empowers institutions to securely design, deploy, and scale agents with ease. Enhance your team’s efficiency with agents that simplify academic and operational workflows with robust security and trust features built in. This provides key tools and resources to help you:

    • Create domain-specific agents to automate complex tasks.
    • Use enterprise-grade identity for agents and built-in trustworthy AI.
    • Deploy and scale agents quickly with managed infrastructure.
    Get started with Azure AI Foundry Agent Service

    Create and scale domain-specific agents

    With Azure AI Foundry Agent Service, your team can create domain-specific agents tailored to your unique needs. It helps you design, deploy, and scale agents that are ready for real-world use. This fully managed service handles infrastructure and orchestration. It includes ready-to-use templates, actions, and connectors for more than 1,400 enterprise data sources, including SharePoint, Microsoft Fabric, and third-party systems. For instance, you can design and deploy agents to help onboard new students with personalized guidance and support administrative teams with instant responses to common questions.

    Institutions like Stanford Medicine are already using the healthcare agent orchestrator in Azure AI Foundry alongside Microsoft Copilot Studio. This integration enhances the efficiency of tumor board meetings through customized clinical workflows.

    Secure and manage your agents

    Creating agents is just the beginning—managing them responsibly plays a critical role in their effective use. With Microsoft Entra Agent ID, you can:

    • Gain complete visibility and control over agents’ actions.
    • Assign unique identities for each agent.
    • Share identity management with your team members.
    • Define access controls and permissions for each agent.
    Learn about Microsoft Entra Agent ID

    Trustworthy AI is a foundational commitment for Microsoft and for our customers. We’ve introduced new capabilities to help institutions discover, protect, and govern AI systems from the start.

    On the security side, Azure AI Foundry integrates with Microsoft Defender for Cloud to provide real-time alerts and insights when threats arise. For compliance, out-of-the box integration with governance tools like Credo AI, Saidot, and Microsoft Purview, helps institutions monitor model performance, assess fairness, and track regulatory requirements.

    By using Azure AI Foundry’s built-in tools for safety, security, and governance, institutions can design and deploy AI systems with greater reliability from the start.

    Powering the next AI frontier with Microsoft Fabric

    Strong data is foundational to effective AI. Microsoft Fabric helps unify your data to power analytics and agents—without the burden of managing complex infrastructure. As a SaaS solution, Fabric offers seamless integration of data tools and can reduce the need for manual service connections.

    Try Microsoft Fabric for free

    At its core is Microsoft OneLake, an open and unified data lake that supports any format, from any cloud. This flexibility allows developers to access and analyze all types of data efficiently.

    Fabric also transforms how you manage and interact with data. With natural language capabilities, you can explore insights that drive student success, enhance research, and boost operational agility—empowering everyone to make informed, data-driven decisions.

    Find the right data when you need it

    Education leaders need tools that turn insights into action. That’s why we’re focused on making data more accessible through conversational experiences. With Copilot in Power BI, users can now ask questions in natural language and receive instant insights—no technical training needed to get started. Whether it’s enrollment trends, retention risks, or alumni giving, faculty and staff can explore data directly within Microsoft Teams to streamline their workflow.

    Empower everyone to interact with their data

    With enhanced interaction capabilities in Power BI and Copilot Studio, transforming data into actionable insights can now be faster and more intuitive. You can explore data through natural, conversational experiences, removing complexity, and making analysis more accessible. This shift empowers you and your teams to break down data silos and uncover valuable insights with ease. Power BI chat simplifies the exploration of complex datasets, offering quicker, more confident decision-making.

    Uncover deeper insights with data agents

    Finally, connecting Fabric data agents to Copilot Studio can help uncover deeper insights. These agents expertly analyze complex datasets, uncovering valuable insights from OneLake and driving informed action. By automating tasks like email sending and workflow triggering, they streamline your interactions with enterprise data, enabling confident decision-making.

    Embrace the future of data-driven higher education with Microsoft Azure and Azure AI Foundry. Discover how innovative data agents and AI-powered insights can enhance your approach to learning and operations. Start your journey today and uncover the limitless possibilities that await you.

    Get started with Azure AI Foundry

    MIL OSI Economics

  • MIL-OSI USA: Senator Murray Opening Remarks at Full Committee Mark Up of Defense and Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education Bills

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Washington State Patty Murray

    ***WATCH: Senator Murray’s opening remarks***

    Washington, D.C. – Today, U.S. Senator Patty Murray (D-WA), Vice Chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee, delivered the following opening remarks as the committee meets to consider the draft fiscal year 2026 Defense and Labor, Health and Human Services, Education, and Related Agencies appropriations acts.

    Senator Murray’s opening remarks, as delivered, are below:

    “As I have said, these are not the bills I would have written on my own—but they nevertheless represent serious bipartisan work to make some truly critical investments in families and our country’s future.

    “From defense funding that supports our military and keeps our country safe to funding for health care, child care, schools, seniors, medical research, public health, workforce training and safety—and many other programs that keep our communities strong.

    “The priorities laid out in both of these bills are fundamental to our nation’s security and Americans’ livelihoods and health.

    “So I’m glad this Committee was able to deliver and reach a bipartisan compromise to write these bills that deliver essential funds to help people, solve problems, and reject many of the absolutely devastating cuts and much of the chaos that President Trump was pushing for.

    “It remains clear as ever to me that we cannot afford to go down the path Trump and Russ Vought want to push us down. Their vision is one where this Committee becomes less bipartisan and less powerful. Where the president and the OMB director call the shots and some Republicans in Congress spend their time cutting what they are told to cut, even at the expense of their own constituents. Where instead of securing new investments for folks back home through bipartisan agreements, lawmakers have to plead their case to this administration to unlock funds we have already delivered or secure special exceptions for spending cuts. Where biomedical research and education funding gets held up for no reason at all. Where we gut investments in working families while letting Trump’s corruption run rampant.

    “That’s what Trump and Vought want.

    “We can—and we must—reject it.

    “Because, there is no comparison between having a bipartisan process, that gives our constituents a say in how their tax dollars are spent. Or another slush fund CR that forfeits our power and lets Trump rob some states, and pick winners and losers regardless of what our communities actually need or the law says.

    “The bills we are voting on today really show how big of a difference there is here. Anyone who has doubts about that, can just look at the LHHS bill.

    “It rejects Trump’s cuts that would have devastated our work to fight substance use disorders, HIV, and pandemics, eliminate women’s health investments like Title X funding and the Teen Pregnancy Prevention program and essentially saw the CDC cut in half.

    “It rejects backward proposals from Trump that would hurt our students and workers—like eliminating preschool grants, or slashing PELL, gutting public school funding, or ending Job Corps and AmeriCorps.

    “It rejects efforts to gut agencies that protect the rights of patients, students, and workers.

    “And, I’m especially pleased to note it rejects Trump’s 40% cut to lifesaving medical research—and increases the NIH budget by $400 million so we continue to make progress against cancer, Alzheimer’s disease, and so much more.

    “To the scientists wondering if there will even be an NIH by the end of this administration: this committee’s resounding message is ‘yes.’

    “Congress has your back—we’re not going to give up the fight against cancer, Alzheimer’s, or rare diseases.

    “We support you and we need you to stay here and keep this research going.

    “But I want to be clear—at the end of the day, this isn’t about rejecting Trump, it is about investing in our families.

    “Investing in our schools, in medical research, in workforce training, and community health.

    “In fact, this bill even increases funding for crucial programs with new investments to allow the Social Security Administration to actually help people and undo some of the damage that Trump and DOGE have recklessly caused and increased investments in child care—something I will never stop fighting to make more progress on.

    “Now, one thing this bill does not do, unfortunately, is fund the Corporation for Public Broadcasting.

    “As everyone knows, Republicans rescinded bipartisan funding we provided for CPB in the first ever partisan rescissions package.

    “It is a shameful reality—and now communities across the country will suffer the consequences as over 1,500 stations lose critical funding.

    “I really hope Republicans will join us to restore this funding down the line—and I want you to know I am going to keep pushing to do that. 

    “Before I close, I want to say: I am clear-eyed: the investments we make in these bills today are really only half of the equation.

    “Because the fact of the matter is we have an administration right now that is intent on ignoring Congress, breaking the law, and doing everything it can without any transparency to dismantle programs and agencies that help families.

    “There is no magic bullet that will change that unfortunate reality.

    “Our bills reject devastating cuts—and reject many of this administration’s absurd proposals—like dismantling the Department of Education, like destroying HHS, and more.

    “But I still want to see us to do much more when it comes to demanding accountability, demanding transparency, and demanding the administration actually follow our laws.

    “We all know President Trump cannot dismantle the Department of Education or ship education programs to other agencies. Authorizing laws prevent that. Appropriations laws prevent that. Yet, that has not stopped him from shipping CTE and adult education programs to DOL in violation of our laws.

    “And Secretary McMahon says she wants to do the same for Title I and IDEA. 

    “So I am very glad our LHHS bill takes new steps to ensure she cannot do that, and Title I and IDEA programs students depend on do not get dismantled or moved out of ED.

    “But I’d like this bill to also do the same for every other education program that states administer, to prevent states from having to deal with the chaos of these dismantling efforts, and I’m disappointed there was not bipartisan support to do that. Still, I am going to keep making the case for more accountability and transparency.

    “We need more members across the aisle to not only reject the cuts but to speak up and speak out against what this administration is already doing to defy our laws and hurt the people we represent.

    “Because, as we speak now, Trump and Vought are holding up billions of dollars we have secured on a bipartisan basis. They are on course to impound billions of taxpayer dollars while agencies fail to meet basic requirements of law.

    “Right now, they are illegally hiding apportionments data that would let us know whether funds we passed are being spent as intended and help us strengthen the bills we are in the middle of writing on. It is absurd we have to mark up bills—while being kept in the dark.  And just this week, we learned Russ Vought—through a footnote—paused $15 billion in NIH funding.

    “One footnote, from an unelected bureaucrat—overruling Congress and even NIH, to block $15 billion in funding for things like cancer research.

    “That is not transparency. It is not what Congress intended. And it is not acceptable. 

    “We need our Republican colleagues to join us in insisting that all blocked funding gets out—not just the programs most important to them.

    “So, in sum: these are critical, solid bills we are considering today that deliver vital funds for families and reject many devastating proposals.

    “And of course I would have liked to do even more, and I will not stop discussing how we make that happen with my colleagues, I will be voting yes to advance both of these bills today.

    “And I am glad we are on track to continue making progress on bipartisan bills that reject devastating cuts and invest in our communities and in our global strength.”

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Canada: Long-term repairs set to begin on North Beach rockslide

    A major step toward long-term stabilization of the slope beside Highway 97 between Callan Road and Okanagan Lake Provincial Park is underway, ensuring the reliability of the highway for Okanagan residents and visitors.

    A $23.2-million contract has been awarded to Emil Anderson Construction Inc. to complete the next phase of work. Construction is expected to begin in fall 2025 and finish in spring 2027.

    Long-term stabilization work will return the highway to its original four-lane configuration. This includes building a retaining wall and catchment area at the base of the slope, along with a concrete wall next to the highway for added reinforcement. Additional rock anchors will also be installed to secure the slope, followed by repairs to the road’s surface and drainage improvements.

    This work will provide lasting support for the hillside and help prevent rockfall impacts, ensuring the ongoing safety and reliability of this key transportation corridor.

    This investment builds on extensive geotechnical work following the rockslide in August 2023, which deposited significant rock and debris onto the highway and forced an immediate closure.

    Between October 2023 and June 2024, crews removed unstable rock through controlled blasting, easing pressure on the slope. By fall 2024, more than 100 rock anchors were installed as part of Phase 1 of stabilization efforts.

    Any impacts to Highway 97 traffic during construction will be communicated via traffic advisories and posted to Drive BC: https://www.drivebc.ca/

    Drivers are asked to use caution through the area, obey posted speed limits and follow the directions of traffic-control personnel.

    MIL OSI Canada News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Governor cuts ribbon on new $25M bridge in Church Rock – Infrastructure upgrade creates safter pedestrian access

    Source: US State of New Mexico

    SANTA FE – Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham and the New Mexico Department of Transportation (NMDOT) today marked the opening of a new $24 million bridge on NM 566 near Church Rock that creates safer access for pedestrians with a dedicated walking trail.

    The steel girder bridge spans the BNSF Railway and delivers pedestrian infrastructure that keeps community members off the highway and out of harm’s way. The project includes full bridge replacement, roadway reconstruction, improved lighting, upgraded drainage systems, and a new pedestrian trail that directly serves the Church Rock community.

    The project was completed over 29 months and was funded through a combination of federal and state National Highway Performance Program funds. The project was a collaborative effort between NMDOT District Six, the City of Gallup, and the Navajo Nation.

    “This project demonstrates our commitment to protecting New Mexico families and improving access to every corner of our state,” said Lujan Grisham. “Every bridge we build, every trail we construct, and every safety improvement we make helps ensure no family has to experience the tragedy of losing a loved one in a preventable pedestrian accident.”

    New Mexico’s pedestrian fatality rate consistently ranks among the highest in the nation. By creating safe, dedicated pathways for pedestrians, NMDOT is taking concrete action to protect lives and strengthen communities.

    “By working closely with the Navajo Nation and the City of Gallup, we’ve created safer, more direct access for the Church Rock community,” said NMDOT Secretary Ricky Serna. “New Mexico has long faced an urgent need to improve pedestrian safety, and this bridge delivers real solutions.”

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: State of Emergency Ahead of Heavy Rainfall

    Source: US State of New York

    overnor Kathy Hochul today will declare a State of Emergency for several New York counties and urges New Yorkers to prepare for heavy rain and the potential for localized flooding, as parts of the state are forecast to be impacted by periods of heavy rain today into Friday. Beginning this afternoon, torrential rain is forecast to impact downstate New York, primarily in the Mid-Hudson, New York City, and Long Island Regions. With the forecast enhanced to moderate risk, flash flooding becomes more likely with significant flooding possible. Flood Watches in Place for New York City, Long Island, and Hudson Valley through Friday afternoon. Significant rainfall is also expected in the Southern Tier and Capital Regions. Roadway and rail travel will be impacted during the Thursday evening commute, and employers in the affected areas are recommended to release employers early to avoid long delays and ensure safe travel home.

    The State of Emergency includes the Bronx, Delaware, Dutchess, Kings, Nassau, New York, Orange, Putnam, Queens, Richmond, Rockland, Suffolk, Sullivan, Ulster, Westchester and contiguous counties. The State released non-essential employees in New York City, Sullivan, Rockland, Orange, Ulster, Dutchess, Westchester, Nassau, and Suffolk Counties at 1:00 p.m.

    “I am urging all New Yorkers to stay vigilant, stay informed, and use caution as we expect excessive rainfall with the potential for flash flooding,” Governor Hochul said. “State agencies are on standby for heavy downpours and localized flooding and will be monitoring the situation in real-time to ensure the safety of all New Yorkers in the path of the storm.”

    A widespread one to three inches of rain is expected with locally higher totals up to five inches possible. Average rainfall rates of a half inch per hour are expected with rates of one to two inches likely. Isolated rates over two inches per hour are possible, most likely Thursday afternoon or evening. Most of the rain will fall in as little as three to six hours from Thursday afternoon through Thursday night. Up to two inches of rain may impact the Southern Tier, Capital Region, and Upper Mid-Hudson Regions.

    The Thursday evening commute will be impacted with areas of flash flooding possible and minor to moderate water level rises could occur on some waterways. Some roads may become impassable from flooding, most likely around underpasses and roads with little or no drainage. The heaviest rainfall rates may be capable of producing subway flooding and overwhelming NYC sewers. Flooding in basements and subterrain floors is also possible.

    Residents are encouraged to monitor their local forecasts, weather watches and warnings. For a complete listing of weather alerts, visit the National Weather Service website at alerts.weather.gov.

    New Yorkers should ensure that government emergency alerts are enabled on their mobile phones. They should also sign up for real-time weather and emergency alerts that will be texted to their phones by texting their county or borough name to 333111.

    Agency Preparations

    Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Services

    The Division’s Office of Emergency Management (OEM) is in contact with their local counterparts and is prepared to facilitate requests for assistance. OEM is in enhanced monitoring status and the Office of Fire Prevention and Control has activated the State Fire Operations Center.

    Water rescue teams from the Office of Fire Prevention and Control, New York State Police and Department of Environmental Conservation are staged in Orange County and Ulster Counties.

    State stockpiles are ready to deploy emergency response assets and supplies as needed. The State Watch Center is monitoring the storm track and statewide impacts closely.

    Department of Transportation

    The State Department of Transportation is monitoring weather conditions and prepared to respond with 3,428 supervisors and operators available statewide. All field staff are available to fully engage and respond.

    Statewide equipment numbers are as follows:

    • 1,430 large dump trucks
    • 337 large loaders
    • 92 chippers
    • 87 tracked and wheeled excavators
    • 33 water pumps
    • 32 traffic and tree crew bucket trucks
    • 28 traffic tower platforms
    • 16 vacuum trucks with sewer jets

    The need for additional resources will be re-evaluated as conditions warrant throughout the event. For real-time travel information, motorists should call 511 or visit 511ny.org, New York State’s official traffic and travel information source.

    Thruway Authority

    The Thruway Authority has 669 operators and supervisors prepared to respond to any wind or flood related issues across the state with small to medium sized excavators, plow/dump trucks, large loaders, portable Variable Message Signs (VMS) boards, portable light towers, smaller generators, smaller pumps and equipment hauling trailers, as well as signage and other traffic control devices available for any detours or closures. VMS and social media are utilized to alert motorists of weather conditions on the Thruway.

    Statewide equipment numbers are as follows:

    • 337 Large and Small Dump Trucks
    • 63 Loaders
    • 31 Trailers
    • 5 Vac Trucks
    • 14 Excavators
    • 8 Brush Chippers
    • 99 Chainsaws
    • 24 Aerial Trucks
    • 22 Skid Steers
    • 86 Portable Generators
    • 65 Portable Light Units

    The Thruway Authority encourages motorists to download its mobile app which is available to download for free on iPhone and Android devices. The app provides motorists direct access to live traffic cameras, real-time traffic information and navigation assistance while on the go. Motorists can also sign up for TRANSalert e-mails which provide the latest traffic conditions along the Thruway, follow @ThruwayTraffic on X, and visit thruway.ny.gov to see an interactive map showing traffic conditions for the Thruway and other New York State roadways.

    Department of Public Service

    New York’s utilities have approximately 5,500 workers available statewide to engage in damage assessment, response, repair and restoration efforts across New York State, as necessary. The utilities will work with the local, county, and state transportation agencies to navigate closed roadways in any areas experiencing flooding. Agency staff will track utilities’ work throughout the event and ensure utilities shift appropriate staffing to regions that experience the greatest impact.

    New York State Police

    State Police instructed all Troopers to remain vigilant and will deploy extra patrols to affected areas as needed. All four-wheel drive vehicles are in service, and all watercraft and specialty vehicles are staged and ready for deployment.

    Department of Environmental Conservation

    The Department of Environmental Conservation’s (DEC) Emergency Management staff, Environmental Conservation Police Officers, Forest Rangers, and regional staff remain on alert and continue to monitor weather forecasts. Working with partner agencies, DEC is prepared to coordinate resource deployment of all available assets, including first responders, to targeted areas in preparation for potential impacts due to heavy rainfall and flooding.

    DEC swift water teams are activated and pre-staged in the Hudson Valley.

    DEC reminds local officials to watch for potential flooding in their communities. Municipalities are encouraged to undertake local assessments of flood-prone areas and to remove any accumulating debris. DEC permits and authorization are not required to remove debris unless stream banks or beds will be disturbed by debris removal and/or the use of heavy equipment. Municipalities and local governments are advised to contact DEC’s Regional Permit Administrators if assistance is required and to help determine if a permit is necessary.

    If a permit is necessary, DEC can issue Emergency Authorizations to expedite approval of projects in place of an individual permit. DEC approves Emergency Authorizations for situations that are deemed an emergency based on the immediate protection of life, health, general welfare, property, or natural resources.

    Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation

    New York State Park Police and park personnel are on alert and closely monitoring weather conditions and impacts. Park visitors should visit parks.ny.gov, check the free mobile app, or call their local park office for the latest updates regarding park hours, openings and closings.

    Metropolitan Transportation Authority

    The Metropolitan Transportation Authority is closely monitoring weather conditions to ensure safe, reliable service. MTA employees will be poised to respond to any weather-related issues. To reduce the likelihood of flooding and respond to any instances of flooding, MTA crews will inspect drains in flood-prone areas to ensure they are functional, and supervisors will monitor flood-prone locations for any reports of flooding to ensure quick response. Elevator and escalator specialists will be deployed to flood-prone locations to attend to any weather-related elevator and escalator troubles.

    Customers are encouraged to check mta.info for the latest service updates, and to use caution while navigating the system. Customers should also sign up for real-time service alerts via text or email. These alerts are also available via the MTA app and the TrainTime app.

    Port Authority of New York and New Jersey

    The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey is closely monitoring weather forecasts and is working with airport terminal operators and other airport partners in preparation. Air travelers should check with their airlines for updated information on their flights or check the Federal Aviation Administration website for any FAA programs that may affect flight operations at their departure airport before leaving for the airport and allow for additional travel time. Motorists who use the Port Authority’s six bridges and tunnels are strongly encouraged to sign up for email alerts, bus riders can use the MyTerminal app for real-time alerts on bus service at the Midtown Bus Terminal, or for PATH riders, check train service information via the PATH mobile app, RidePATH.

    Before and During the Storm

    • Stay Informed: Monitor your local weather forecast and follow any warnings that may be broadcast.
    • Follow Instructions from Local Officials: If you are advised by emergency officials to take immediate action such as evacuation, do not wait – follow all orders promptly.
    • Do Not Walk, Swim or Drive Through Floodwaters: One foot of moving water can sweep a vehicle away. If you have doubts, remember: “Turn Around, Don’t Drown!”
    • Know your evacuation route and how to get to higher ground
    • Know your area’s type of flood risk — visit FEMA’s Flood Map Service Center.
    • Have a flood emergency plan in place that includes considerations for your children, pets and neighbors.
    • Have an emergency go bag ready to grab for you, your family and your pets that includes any medications you may need.
    • Check in with elderly neighbors or those who may have mobility issues.
    • Do not touch downed power lines
    • Keep your phone charged
    • Keep a small disaster supply kit in the trunk of your car.

    After Flood Waters Have Receded

    • Wait until an area has been declared safe before entering. Be careful driving, since roads may be damaged and power lines may be down.
    • If your home or apartment has been flooded, DO NOT turn on electrical appliances until an electrician has checked the system and appliances.
    • Throw out any medicine or food that may have had contact with flood waters.
    • Keep your automobile fueled. If electric power is cut off, gasoline stations may not be able to pump fuel for several days.
    • Do not touch downed power lines.

    For more preparedness information and safety tips from DHSES, visit dhses.ny.gov. The National Weather Service website also includes Flood Safety Tips and Spring Safety Resources.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Security: Migrant Crossings at the Darien Gap Continue to Plummet, Crossings Are Down 99.98%

    Source: US Department of Homeland Security

    In May, only 13 crossings were recorded—June dropped further to just 10

    WASHINGTON – Today, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) announced migrant crossings at the Darien Gap have dropped 99.98% for the months of May and June 2025 compared to a peak under the Biden Administration in August 2023.  

    Under the Biden Administration, crossings in a single month exceeded 82,000. In May 2025, there were only 13 crossings and the number fell again in June 2025 to just 10. This is a massive decline in illegal migration through one of the key channels normally utilized by would-be illegal aliens to invade our country.  

    “The dangerous Darien Gap trek is notorious for exposing migrants, including children and the most vulnerable, to sexual abuse, trafficking, and exploitation,” said Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin. “In Panama’s Darien Gap, migrants are now turning BACK before they even reach our border— only 10 migrants crossed in June. This is more than a 99.98% drop from the Biden high when 82,000 illegal aliens crossed in a single month. The world is hearing our message that America’s borders are closed to lawbreakers. Thanks to President Trump and Secretary Noem, we have the most secure border in American history.” 

    With the most secure border in American history, DHS is focused on deporting those who break our nation’s laws. If you are here illegally, use the CBP Home App to take control of your departure and receive financial support to return home. Illegal aliens who use the CBP Home App to self-deport also receive cost-free travel and a $1,000 exit bonus, paid after their return is confirmed through the app. 

    ###

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI: Credit Acceptance Announces Second Quarter 2025 Results

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Southfield, Michigan, July 31, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Credit Acceptance Corporation (Nasdaq: CACC) (referred to as the “Company”, “Credit Acceptance”, “we”, “our”, or “us”) today announced consolidated net income of $87.4 million, or $7.42 per diluted share, for the three months ended June 30, 2025. Adjusted net income, a non-GAAP financial measure, for the three months ended June 30, 2025 was $100.8 million, or $8.56 per diluted share. The following table summarizes our financial results:

    (In millions, except per share data)   For the Three Months Ended
        June 30, 2025   March 31, 2025   June 30, 2024
    GAAP net income (loss)   $         87.4    $         106.3    $         (47.1)  
    GAAP net income (loss) per diluted share   $         7.42    $         8.66    $         (3.83)  
                 
    Adjusted net income   $         100.8    $         114.8    $         126.4   
    Adjusted net income per diluted share   $         8.56    $         9.35    $         10.29   

    Our results and achievements for the second quarter of 2025 included the following:

    • A decline in forecasted collection rates, which decreased forecasted net cash flows from our loan portfolio by $55.8 million, or 0.5%, and slower forecasted net cash flow timing.
    • A 6.8% increase in the average balance of our loan portfolio from the second quarter of 2024 to $8.0 billion, which is our largest ever.
    • A decline in Consumer Loan assignment unit and dollar volumes of 14.6% and 18.8%, respectively, as compared to the second quarter of 2024.
    • The repurchase of approximately 530,000 shares, or 4.5% of the shares outstanding at the beginning of the quarter.
    • The enrollment of 1,560 new dealers with 10,655 active dealers during the quarter.
    • $63.3 million in dealer holdback and accelerated dealer holdback payments to dealers.
    • $23.4 million contingent loss related to previously disclosed legal matters.
    • An increase in our estimated long-term effective income tax rate from 23% to 25%.
    • Named one of the 100 Best Companies to Work For® by Great Place to Work® and Fortune magazine for the eleventh time, with a #34 ranking, and a Spring 2025 Top Workplaces Culture Excellence award winner in the following five categories: Work-Life Flexibility, Leadership, Innovation, Purpose & Values, and Compensation & Benefits.

    Consumer Loan Metrics

    Dealers assign retail installment contracts (referred to as “Consumer Loans”) to Credit Acceptance. At the time a Consumer Loan is submitted to us for assignment, we forecast future expected cash flows from the Consumer Loan. Based on the amount and timing of these forecasts and expected expense levels, an advance or one-time purchase payment is made to the related dealer at a price designed to maximize economic profit, a non-GAAP financial measure that considers our return on capital, our cost of capital, and the amount of capital invested. 

    We use a statistical model to estimate the expected collection rate for each Consumer Loan at the time of assignment. We continue to evaluate the expected collection rate for each Consumer Loan subsequent to assignment. Our evaluation becomes more accurate as the Consumer Loans age, as we use actual performance data in our forecast. By comparing our current expected collection rate for each Consumer Loan with the rate we projected at the time of assignment, we are able to assess the accuracy of our initial forecast. The following table compares our aggregated forecast of Consumer Loan collection rates as of June 30, 2025, with the aggregated forecasts as of March 31, 2025 and at the time of assignment, segmented by year of assignment:

        Forecasted Collection Percentage as of (1)   Current Forecast Variance from
     Consumer Loan Assignment Year   June 30, 2025   March 31, 2025   Initial
    Forecast
      March 31, 2025   Initial
    Forecast
    2016           63.9  %           63.9  %           65.4  %           0.0  %           -1.5  %
    2017           64.8  %           64.8  %           64.0  %           0.0  %           0.8  %
    2018           65.6  %           65.5  %           63.6  %           0.1  %           2.0  %
    2019           67.3  %           67.2  %           64.0  %           0.1  %           3.3  %
    2020           68.0  %           67.9  %           63.4  %           0.1  %           4.6  %
    2021           63.8  %           63.9  %           66.3  %           -0.1  %           -2.5  %
    2022           59.7  %           60.0  %           67.5  %           -0.3  %           -7.8  %
    2023           64.1  %           64.3  %           67.5  %           -0.2  %           -3.4  %
    2024           65.7  %           66.3  %           67.2  %           -0.6  %           -1.5  %
         2025 (2)           66.9  %           66.0  %           66.9  %           0.9  %           0.0  %

    (1)   Represents the total forecasted collections we expect to collect on the Consumer Loans as a percentage of the repayments that we were contractually owed on the Consumer Loans at the time of assignment. Contractual repayments include both principal and interest. Forecasted collection rates are negatively impacted by canceled Consumer Loans as the contractual amount owed is not removed from the denominator for purposes of computing forecasted collection rates.
    (2)   The forecasted collection rate for 2025 Consumer Loans as of June 30, 2025 includes both Consumer Loans that were in our portfolio as of March 31, 2025 and Consumer Loans assigned during the most recent quarter. The following table provides forecasted collection rates for each of these segments

        Forecasted Collection Percentage as of   Current Forecast Variance from
    2025 Consumer Loan Assignment Period   June 30, 2025   March 31, 2025   Initial
    Forecast
      March 31, 2025   Initial
    Forecast
    January 1, 2025 through March 31, 2025           66.2  %           66.0  %           66.2  %           0.2  %           0.0  %
    April 1, 2025 through June 30, 2025           67.7  %           —              67.7  %           —              0.0  %

    For the three months ended June 30, 2025, forecasted collection rates improved for Consumer Loans assigned in 2025, declined for Consumer Loans assigned in 2022 through 2024, and were generally consistent with expectations at the start of the period for all other assignment years presented.

    The changes to our forecast of future net cash flows from our Loan portfolio (forecasted collections less forecasted dealer holdback payments) for each of the last eight quarters are shown in the following table:

    (Dollars in millions)   Decrease in Forecasted Net Cash Flows
    Three Months Ended   Total Loans   % Change from Forecast at Beginning of Period
    September 30, 2023   $         (69.4)             -0.7  %
    December 31, 2023             (57.0)             -0.6  %
    March 31, 2024             (30.8)             -0.3  %
    June 30, 2024             (189.3)             -1.7  %
    September 30, 2024             (62.8)             -0.6  %
    December 31, 2024             (31.1)             -0.3  %
    March 31, 2025             (20.9)             -0.2  %
    June 30, 2025             (55.8)             -0.5  %

    During the second quarter of 2025, we applied an adjustment to our methodology for forecasting the amount of future net cash flows from our loan portfolio, which reduced the forecasted collection rates for Consumer Loans assigned in 2024. Consumer Loans assigned in 2024 prior to the implementation of our scorecard adjustment during the third quarter of 2024 had underperformed relative to the forecast adjustment we implemented during the second quarter of 2024. Accordingly, in the second quarter of 2025, we applied an adjustment to that segment of the Consumer Loans assigned in 2024 to reduce forecasted collection rates to what we believed the ultimate collection rates would be based on these trends. Changes in the amount and timing of forecasted net cash flows are recognized in the period of change as a provision for credit losses. The implementation of this forecast adjustment during the second quarter of 2025 reduced forecasted net cash flows by $18.6 million, or 0.2%, and increased provision for credit losses by $16.5 million.

    The following table presents information on Consumer Loan assignments for each of the last 10 years:

         Average   Total Assignment Volume
     Consumer Loan
    Assignment Year
      Consumer Loan (1)   Advance (2)   Initial Loan Term (in months)   Unit Volume   Dollar Volume (2)
    (in millions)
    2016   $         18,218   $         7,976   53   330,710   $         2,635.5
    2017     20,230     8,746   55   328,507     2,873.1
    2018     22,158     9,635   57   373,329     3,595.8
    2019     23,139     10,174   57   369,805     3,772.2
    2020     24,262     10,656   59   341,967     3,641.2
    2021     25,632     11,790   59   268,730     3,167.8
    2022     27,242     12,924   60   280,467     3,625.3
    2023     27,025     12,475   61   332,499     4,147.8
    2024     26,497     11,961   61   386,126     4,618.4
               2025 (3) (4)     25,376     11,362   60   185,764     2,110.7

    (1)   Represents the repayments that we were contractually owed on Consumer Loans at the time of assignment, which include both principal and interest.
    (2)   Represents advances paid to dealers on Consumer Loans assigned under the portfolio program and one-time payments made to dealers to purchase Consumer Loans assigned under the purchase program. Payments of dealer holdback and accelerated dealer holdback are not included.
    (3)   Represents activity for the six months ended June 30, 2025. Information in this table for each of the years prior to 2025 represents activity for all 12 months of that year.
    (4)   The averages for 2025 Consumer Loans include both Consumer Loans that were in our portfolio as of March 31, 2025 and Consumer Loans assigned during the most recent quarter. The following table provides averages for each of these segments:

        Average
    2025 Consumer Loan Assignment Period   Consumer Loan   Advance   Initial Loan Term (in months)
    January 1, 2025 through March 31, 2025   $         25,188   $         11,096           60
    April 1, 2025 through June 30, 2025             25,596             11,674           60

    The profitability of our loans is primarily driven by the amount and timing of the net cash flows we receive from the spread between the forecasted collection rate and the advance rate, less operating expenses and the cost of capital. Forecasting collection rates accurately at loan inception is difficult. With this in mind, we establish advance rates that are intended to allow us to achieve acceptable levels of profitability across our portfolio, even if collection rates are less than we initially forecast.
    The following table presents aggregate forecasted Consumer Loan collection rates, advance rates, and spreads (the forecasted collection rate less the advance rate), and the percentage of the forecasted collections that had been realized as of June 30, 2025, as well as forecasted collection rates and spreads at the time of assignment. All amounts, unless otherwise noted, are presented as a percentage of the initial balance of the Consumer Loan (principal + interest). The table includes both dealer loans and purchased loans.

        Forecasted Collection % as of       Spread % as of    
     Consumer Loan Assignment Year   June 30, 2025   Initial Forecast   Advance % (1)   June 30, 2025   Initial Forecast   % of Forecast
    Realized (2)
    2016           63.9  %           65.4  %           43.8  %           20.1  %           21.6  %           99.6  %
    2017           64.8  %           64.0  %           43.2  %           21.6  %           20.8  %           99.4  %
    2018           65.6  %           63.6  %           43.5  %           22.1  %           20.1  %           99.0  %
    2019           67.3  %           64.0  %           44.0  %           23.3  %           20.0  %           98.0  %
    2020           68.0  %           63.4  %           43.9  %           24.1  %           19.5  %           95.1  %
    2021           63.8  %           66.3  %           46.0  %           17.8  %           20.3  %           88.7  %
    2022           59.7  %           67.5  %           47.4  %           12.3  %           20.1  %           74.7  %
    2023           64.1  %           67.5  %           46.2  %           17.9  %           21.3  %           55.0  %
    2024           65.7  %           67.2  %           45.1  %           20.6  %           22.1  %           30.4  %
          2025 (3)           66.9  %           66.9  %           44.9  %           22.0  %           22.0  %           6.9  %

    (1)   Represents advances paid to dealers on Consumer Loans assigned under the portfolio program and one-time payments made to dealers to purchase Consumer Loans assigned under the purchase program as a percentage of the initial balance of the Consumer Loans.  Payments of dealer holdback and accelerated dealer holdback are not included.
    (2)   Presented as a percentage of total forecasted collections
    (3)   The forecasted collection rate, advance rate and spread for 2025 Consumer Loans as of June 30, 2025 include both Consumer Loans that were in our portfolio as of March 31, 2025 and Consumer Loans assigned during the most recent quarter. The following table provides forecasted collection rates, advance rates, and spreads for each of these segments:

        Forecasted Collection % as of       Spread % as of
    2025 Consumer Loan Assignment Period   June 30, 2025   Initial Forecast   Advance %   June 30, 2025   Initial Forecast
    January 1, 2025 through March 31, 2025           66.2  %           66.2  %           44.2  %           22.0  %           22.0  %
    April 1, 2025 through June 30, 2025           67.7  %           67.7  %           45.7  %           22.0  %           22.0  %

    The risk of a material change in our forecasted collection rate declines as the Consumer Loans age. For 2020 and prior Consumer Loan assignments, the risk of a material forecast variance is modest, as we have currently realized in excess of 90% of the expected collections. Conversely, the forecasted collection rates for more recent Consumer Loan assignments are less certain as a significant portion of our forecast has not been realized.

    The spread between the forecasted collection rate as of June 30, 2025 and the advance rate ranges from 12.3% to 24.1%, on an annual basis, for Consumer Loans assigned over the last 10 years. The spreads with respect to 2019 and 2020 Consumer Loans have been positively impacted by Consumer Loan performance, which has exceeded our initial estimates by a greater margin than the other years presented. The spreads with respect to 2021 through 2024 Consumer Loans have been negatively impacted by Consumer Loan performance, which has been lower than our initial estimates by a greater margin than the other years presented. The higher spread for 2025 Consumer Loans relative to 2024 Consumer Loans as of June 30, 2025 was primarily a result of Consumer Loan performance, as the performance of 2024 Consumer Loans has been lower than our initial estimates.

    The following table compares our forecast of aggregate Consumer Loan collection rates as of June 30, 2025 with the forecasts at the time of assignment, for dealer loans and purchased loans separately:

        Dealer Loans   Purchased Loans
        Forecasted Collection Percentage as of (1)       Forecasted Collection Percentage as of (1)    
     Consumer Loan Assignment Year   June 30,
    2025
      Initial
    Forecast
      Variance   June 30,
    2025
      Initial
    Forecast
      Variance
    2016           63.1  %           65.1  %           -2.0  %           66.1  %           66.5  %           -0.4  %
    2017           64.1  %           63.8  %           0.3  %           66.4  %           64.6  %           1.8  %
    2018           65.0  %           63.6  %           1.4  %           66.8  %           63.5  %           3.3  %
    2019           66.9  %           63.9  %           3.0  %           67.9  %           64.2  %           3.7  %
    2020           67.8  %           63.3  %           4.5  %           68.3  %           63.6  %           4.7  %
    2021           63.6  %           66.3  %           -2.7  %           64.3  %           66.3  %           -2.0  %
    2022           58.9  %           67.3  %           -8.4  %           61.7  %           68.0  %           -6.3  %
    2023           62.9  %           66.8  %           -3.9  %           67.6  %           69.4  %           -1.8  %
    2024           64.5  %           66.3  %           -1.8  %           70.0  %           70.7  %           -0.7  %
    2025           65.4  %           65.4  %           0.0  %           71.5  %           71.5  %           0.0  %

    (1)   The forecasted collection rates presented for dealer loans and purchased loans reflect the Consumer Loan classification at the time of assignment. The forecasted collection rates represent the total forecasted collections we expect to collect on the Consumer Loans as a percentage of the repayments that we were contractually owed on the Consumer Loans at the time of assignment. Contractual repayments include both principal and interest. Forecasted collection rates are negatively impacted by canceled Consumer Loans as the contractual amount owed is not removed from the denominator for purposes of computing forecasted collection rates.

    The following table presents aggregate forecasted Consumer Loan collection rates, advance rates, and spreads (the forecasted collection rate less the advance rate) as of June 30, 2025 for dealer loans and purchased loans separately.  All amounts are presented as a percentage of the initial balance of the Consumer Loan (principal + interest).

        Dealer Loans   Purchased Loans
     Consumer Loan Assignment Year   Forecasted Collection % (1)   Advance % (1)(2)   Spread %   Forecasted Collection % (1)   Advance % (1)(2)   Spread %
    2016           63.1  %           42.1  %           21.0  %           66.1  %           48.6  %           17.5  %
    2017           64.1  %           42.1  %           22.0  %           66.4  %           45.8  %           20.6  %
    2018           65.0  %           42.7  %           22.3  %           66.8  %           45.2  %           21.6  %
    2019           66.9  %           43.1  %           23.8  %           67.9  %           45.6  %           22.3  %
    2020           67.8  %           43.0  %           24.8  %           68.3  %           45.5  %           22.8  %
    2021           63.6  %           45.1  %           18.5  %           64.3  %           47.7  %           16.6  %
    2022           58.9  %           46.4  %           12.5  %           61.7  %           50.1  %           11.6  %
    2023           62.9  %           44.8  %           18.1  %           67.6  %           49.8  %           17.8  %
    2024           64.5  %           44.1  %           20.4  %           70.0  %           48.9  %           21.1  %
    2025           65.4  %           43.1  %           22.3  %           71.5  %           50.3  %           21.2  %

    (1)   The forecasted collection rates and advance rates presented for dealer loans and purchased loans reflect the Consumer Loan classification at the time of assignment.
    (2)   Represents advances paid to dealers on Consumer Loans assigned under the portfolio program and one-time payments made to dealers to purchase Consumer Loans assigned under the purchase program as a percentage of the initial balance of the Consumer Loans.  Payments of dealer holdback and accelerated dealer holdback are not included.

    Although the advance rate on purchased loans is higher as compared to the advance rate on dealer loans, purchased loans do not require us to pay dealer holdback.

    The spread as of June 30, 2025 on 2025 dealer loans was 22.3%, as compared to a spread of 20.4% on 2024 dealer loans. The increase was primarily a result of Consumer Loan performance, as the performance of 2024 dealer loans has been lower than our initial estimates.

    The spread as of June 30, 2025 on 2025 purchased loans was 21.2%, as compared to a spread of 21.1% on 2024 purchased loans, reflecting the net impact of two offsetting factors. Consumer Loan performance increased the spread from 2024 to 2025, as the performance of 2024 purchased loans has been lower than our initial estimates. This impact of Consumer Loan performance was partially offset by the impact of a lower initial spread on 2025 purchased loans, due to the advance rate increasing by a greater margin than the initial forecast in our purchased loan portfolio.

    Consumer Loan Volume

    The following table summarizes changes in Consumer Loan assignment volume in each of the last eight quarters as compared to the same period in the previous year:

        Year over Year Percent Change
    Three Months Ended   Unit Volume   Dollar Volume (1)
    September 30, 2023           13.0  %           10.5  %
    December 31, 2023           26.7  %           21.3  %
    March 31, 2024           24.1  %           20.2  %
    June 30, 2024           20.9  %           16.3  %
    September 30, 2024           17.7  %           12.2  %
    December 31, 2024           0.3  %           -4.9  %
    March 31, 2025           -10.1  %           -15.5  %
    June 30, 2025           -14.6  %           -18.8  %

    (1)   Represents advances paid to dealers on Consumer Loans assigned under the portfolio program and one-time payments made to dealers to purchase Consumer Loans assigned under the purchase program.  Payments of dealer holdback and accelerated dealer holdback are not included.

    Consumer Loan assignment volumes depend on a number of factors including (1) the overall demand for our financing programs and (2) the amount of capital available to fund new loans. Our pricing strategy is intended to maximize the amount of economic profit we generate, within the confines of capital constraints.

    Unit and dollar volumes declined 14.6% and 18.8%, respectively, during the second quarter of 2025 as the number of active dealers declined 0.8% and the average unit volume per active dealer declined 14.0%. Dollar volume declined by more than unit volume during the second quarter of 2025 due to a decrease in the average advance paid, primarily resulting from a decrease in the average size of Consumer Loans assigned. Unit volume for the 28-day period ended July 28, 2025 decreased 19.4% compared to the same period in 2024.

    The following table summarizes the changes in Consumer Loan unit volume and active dealers:

      For the Three Months Ended June 30,    
      2025   2024   % Change
    Consumer Loan unit volume         85,486            100,057            -14.6  %
    Active dealers (1)         10,655            10,736            -0.8  %
    Average volume per active dealer         8.0            9.3            -14.0  %
               
    Consumer Loan unit volume from dealers active both periods         68,747            82,646            -16.8  %
    Dealers active both periods         6,876            6,876            —   
    Average volume per dealer active both periods         10.0            12.0            -16.8  %
               
    Consumer loan unit volume from dealers not active both periods         16,739            17,411            -3.9  %
    Dealers not active both periods         3,779            3,860            -2.1  %
    Average volume per dealer not active both periods         4.4            4.5            -2.2  %

    (1)   Active dealers are dealers who have received funding for at least one Consumer Loan during the period.

    The following table provides additional information on the changes in Consumer Loan unit volume and active dealers: 

      For the Three Months Ended June 30,    
      2025     2024     % Change
    Consumer Loan unit volume from new active dealers         3,216              3,820              -15.8  %
    New active dealers (1)         1,094              1,080              1.3  %
    Average volume per new active dealer         2.9              3.5              -17.1  %
               
    Attrition (2)         -17.4  %           -16.7  %    

    (1)   New active dealers are dealers who enrolled in our program and have received funding for their first dealer loan or purchased loan from us during the period.
    (2)   Attrition is measured according to the following formula:  decrease in Consumer Loan unit volume from dealers who have received funding for at least one dealer loan or purchased loan during the comparable period of the prior year but did not receive funding for any dealer loans or purchased loans during the current period divided by prior year comparable period Consumer Loan unit volume.

    The following table shows the percentage of Consumer Loans assigned to us as dealer loans and purchased loans for each of the last eight quarters:

        Unit Volume   Dollar Volume (1)
    Three Months Ended   Dealer Loans   Purchased Loans   Dealer Loans   Purchased Loans
    September 30, 2023           74.8  %           25.2  %           71.7  %           28.3  %
    December 31, 2023           77.2  %           22.8  %           75.0  %           25.0  %
    March 31, 2024           78.2  %           21.8  %           76.6  %           23.4  %
    June 30, 2024           78.5  %           21.5  %           77.3  %           22.7  %
    September 30, 2024           79.5  %           20.5  %           78.4  %           21.6  %
    December 31, 2024           78.7  %           21.3  %           77.7  %           22.3  %
    March 31, 2025           77.0  %           23.0  %           75.1  %           24.9  %
    June 30, 2025           71.6  %           28.4  %           68.3  %           31.7  %

    (1)   Represents advances paid to dealers on Consumer Loans assigned under the portfolio program and one-time payments made to dealers to purchase Consumer Loans assigned under the purchase program.  Payments of dealer holdback and accelerated dealer holdback are not included.

    As of both June 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024, the net dealer loans receivable balance was 72.3% of the total net loans receivable balance. In 2025, we expanded dealer access to the purchase program for Consumer Loans to consumers with higher credit ratings. The increase in the percentage of purchased loans in 2025 Consumer Loan assignment volume was primarily related to Consumer Loans assigned under this expanded dealer access.

    Financial Results

    (Dollars in millions, except per share data) For the Three Months Ended June 30,    
        2025     2024     % Change
    GAAP average debt $         6,583.8    $         5,818.2              13.2  %
    GAAP average shareholders’ equity           1,635.9              1,623.5              0.8  %
    Average capital $         8,219.7    $         7,441.7              10.5  %
    GAAP net income (loss) $         87.4    $         (47.1)             285.6  %
    Diluted weighted average shares outstanding   11,771,525      12,282,174              -4.2  %
    GAAP net income (loss) per diluted share $         7.42    $         (3.83)             293.7  %

    The increase in GAAP net income for the three months ended June 30, 2025, as compared to the same period in 2024, was primarily a result of the following:

    • A decrease in provision for credit losses of 46.2% ($148.0 million), due to:
      • A decrease in provision for credit losses on forecast changes of $136.5 million, due to a smaller decline in Consumer Loan performance, which was primarily the result of a smaller downward forecast adjustment applied to our forecasting methodology during the second quarter of 2025 compared to the downward forecast adjustment applied in the second quarter of 2024. The implementation of the forecast adjustment during the second quarter of 2025 reduced forecasted net cash flows by $18.6 million, or 0.2%, and increased provision for credit losses by $16.5 million, whereas the implementation of the forecast adjustment during the second quarter of 2024 reduced forecasted net cash flows by $147.2 million, or 1.4%, and increased our provision for credit losses by $127.5 million.
      • A decrease in provision for credit losses on new Consumer Loan assignments of $11.5 million, primarily due to a 14.6% decrease in Consumer Loan assignment unit volume.
    • An increase in finance charges of 8.6% ($43.0 million), primarily due to an increase in the average balance of our loan portfolio.
    • A loss on sale of a building of $23.7 million recognized during the three months ended June 30, 2024.
    • An increase in interest expense of 13.0% ($13.6 million), primarily due to an increase in our average outstanding debt balance, primarily due to borrowings used to fund the growth of our loan portfolio and stock repurchases.
    • An increase in operating expenses of 25.0% ($31.1 million), primarily due to:
      • An increase in general and administrative expense of 94.8% ($22.0 million), primarily due to an increase in legal expenses, which included the recognition of a $23.4 million contingent loss during the second quarter of 2025 related to previously disclosed legal matters.
      • An increase in salaries and wages expense of 10.4% ($7.9 million), primarily due to increases in (i) the number of team members, as we are investing in our business with the goal of increasing the speed at which we enhance our product for dealers and consumers, and (ii) stock-based compensation expense, primarily due to equity awards granted to our executive officers and senior leaders.
    • An increase in provision for income taxes of 470.7% ($38.6 million), primarily due to an increase in pre-tax income.

    Adjusted financial results are provided to help shareholders understand our financial performance. The financial data below is non-GAAP, unless labeled otherwise. We use adjusted financial information internally to measure financial performance and to determine certain incentive compensation. We also use economic profit as a framework to evaluate business decisions and strategies, with the objective to maximize economic profit over the long term. In addition, certain debt facilities utilize adjusted financial information for the determination of loan collateral values and to measure financial covenants. The table below shows our results following adjustments to reflect non-GAAP accounting methods. Material adjustments are explained in the table footnotes and the subsequent “Floating Yield Adjustment” and “Senior Notes Adjustment” sections. Measures such as adjusted average capital, adjusted net income, adjusted net income per diluted share, adjusted interest expense (after-tax), adjusted net income plus adjusted interest expense (after-tax), adjusted return on capital, adjusted revenue, operating expenses, adjusted loans receivable, adjusted finance charges, adjusted average loans receivable, economic profit, and economic profit per diluted share are non-GAAP financial measures. Non-GAAP financial measures should be viewed in addition to, and not as an alternative for, our reported results prepared in accordance with GAAP.

    Adjusted financial results for the three months ended June 30, 2025, compared to the same period in 2024, include the following:

    (Dollars in millions, except per share data) For the Three Months Ended June 30,    
        2025       2024     % Change
    Adjusted average capital $         8,932.7      $         8,033.3              11.2  %
    Adjusted net income $         100.8      $         126.4              -20.3  %
    Adjusted interest expense (after-tax) $         88.6      $         80.5              10.1  %
    Adjusted net income plus adjusted interest expense (after-tax) $         189.4      $         206.9              -8.5  %
    Adjusted return on capital           8.5  %             10.3  %           -17.5  %
    Cost of capital           7.4  %             7.5  %           -1.3  %
    Economic profit $         24.4      $         56.2              -56.6  %
    Diluted weighted average shares outstanding   11,771,525        12,282,174              -4.2  %
    Adjusted net income per diluted share $         8.56      $         10.29              -16.8  %
    Economic profit per diluted share $         2.07      $         4.58              -54.8  %

    Economic profit decreased 56.6% for the three months ended June 30, 2025, as compared to the same period in 2024. Economic profit is a function of the return on capital in excess of the cost of capital and the amount of capital invested in the business. The following table summarizes the impact each of these components had on the changes in economic profit for the three months ended June 30, 2025, as compared to the same period in 2024:

    (In millions) Year over Year Change in Economic Profit
      For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2025
    Decrease in adjusted return on capital $         (40.6)  
    Decrease in cost of capital           2.5   
    Increase in adjusted average capital           6.3   
    Decrease in economic profit $         (31.8)  

    The decrease in economic profit for the three months ended June 30, 2025, as compared to the same period in 2024, was primarily a result of the following:

    • A decrease in our adjusted return on capital of 180 basis points, primarily due to:
      • A decrease in the yield used to recognize adjusted finance charges on our loan portfolio decreased our adjusted return on capital by 100 basis points, primarily due to both a decline in forecasted collection rates and slower forecasted net cash flow timing throughout 2024 and 2025. The slower forecasted net cash flow timing was primarily due to lower-than-expected Consumer Loan prepayments, which remain below historical averages.
      • An increase in operating expenses decreased our adjusted return on capital by 60 basis points as operating expenses increased by 25.0% while adjusted average capital increased by 11.2%. The increase in operating expenses was primarily due to an increase in legal expenses, which included the recognition of a $23.4 million contingent loss during the second quarter of 2025 related to previously disclosed legal matters.
      • An increase in our estimated long-term effective income tax rate decreased our adjusted return on capital by 20 basis points as the rate increased from 23% to 25% for the second quarter of 2025 and future periods. The increase in our long-term estimate was due to higher state and local income taxes in certain jurisdictions and lower excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation.
    • An increase in adjusted average capital of 11.2%, primarily due to an increase in the average balance of our loan portfolio.

    The following table shows adjusted revenue and operating expenses as a percentage of adjusted average capital, the adjusted return on capital, and the percentage change in adjusted average capital for each of the last eight quarters, compared to the same period in the prior year:

        For the Three Months Ended
        Jun. 30, 2025   Mar. 31, 2025   Dec. 31, 2024   Sept. 30, 2024   Jun. 30, 2024   Mar. 31, 2024   Dec. 31, 2023   Sept. 30, 2023
    Adjusted finance charges as a percentage of adjusted average loans receivable (1)           17.0  %           16.7  %           16.5  %           16.4  %           17.8  %           17.6  %           17.9  %           18.5  %
    Adjusted revenue as a percentage of adjusted average capital (1)           18.3  %           18.0  %           18.4  %           18.2  %           19.6  %           19.8  %           20.2  %           20.7  %
    Operating expenses as a percentage of adjusted average capital (1)           7.0  %           6.1  %           5.6  %           6.2  %           6.2  %           6.7  %           6.3  %           6.3  %
    Adjusted return on capital (1)           8.5  %           9.2  %           9.8  %           9.3  %           10.3  %           10.1  %           10.6  %           11.1  %
    Percentage change in adjusted average capital compared to the same period in the prior year           11.2  %           18.3  %           19.3  %           19.4  %           17.6  %           14.6  %           11.5  %           8.8  %

    (1)   Annualized.

    The decrease in adjusted return on capital for the three months ended June 30, 2025, as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2025, was primarily due to faster growth in operating expenses, which decreased the adjusted return on capital by 70 basis points, as operating expenses increased by 14.8% while adjusted average capital grew 0.6%. The $20.0 million increase in operating expenses was primarily due to an increase in legal expenses, which included the recognition of a $23.4 million contingent loss during the second quarter of 2025 related to previously disclosed legal matters. The decrease was partially offset by an increase in the yield used to recognize adjusted finance charges on our loan portfolio, which increased our adjusted return on capital by 40 basis points, due to higher yields on more recent Consumer Loan assignments, partially offset by a decline in Consumer Loan performance in the first and second quarters of 2025.

    The following tables provide a reconciliation of non-GAAP measures to GAAP measures.  Certain amounts do not recalculate due to rounding.

    (Dollars in millions, except per share data)   For the Three Months Ended
        Jun. 30, 2025   Mar. 31, 2025   Dec. 31, 2024   Sept. 30, 2024   Jun. 30, 2024   Mar. 31, 2024   Dec. 31, 2023   Sept. 30, 2023
    Adjusted net income                                
    GAAP net income (loss)   $         87.4      $         106.3      $         151.9      $         78.8      $         (47.1)     $         64.3      $         93.6      $         70.8   
    Floating yield adjustment (after-tax)             (117.1)               (118.9)               (116.8)               (115.1)               (96.1)               (92.4)               (83.9)               (76.4)  
    GAAP provision for credit losses (after-tax)             129.6                124.6                95.0                142.2                246.9                143.2                126.1                142.1   
    Loss on sale of building (after-tax) (1)             —                —                —                —                18.3                —                —                —   
    Senior notes adjustment (after-tax)             —                —                —                —                —                —                (2.6)               (0.5)  
    Income tax adjustment (2)             0.9                2.8                (4.1)               3.2                4.4                2.3                (4.1)               3.5   
    Adjusted net income   $         100.8      $         114.8      $         126.0      $         109.1      $         126.4      $         117.4      $         129.1      $         139.5   
                                     
    Adjusted net income per diluted share (3)   $         8.56       $         9.35      $         10.17      $         8.79      $         10.29      $         9.28      $         10.06      $         10.70   
    Diluted weighted average shares outstanding     11,771,525        12,279,446        12,388,072        12,415,143        12,282,174        12,646,529        12,837,181        13,039,638   
    Adjusted revenue                                
    GAAP total revenue   $         583.8      $         571.1      $         565.9      $         550.3      $         538.2      $         508.0      $         491.6      $         478.6   
    Floating yield adjustment             (156.0)               (154.5)               (151.8)               (149.4)               (124.8)               (120.0)               (108.9)               (99.3)  
    GAAP provision for claims             (19.8)               (16.1)               (17.7)               (18.5)               (20.3)               (17.0)               (16.6)               (16.5)  
    Adjusted revenue   $         408.0      $         400.5      $         396.4      $         382.4      $         393.1      $         371.0      $         366.1      $         362.8   
    Adjusted average capital                                
    GAAP average debt   $         6,583.8      $         6,398.3      $         6,202.5      $         6,071.1      $         5,818.2      $         5,306.8      $         4,986.3      $         4,831.4   
    Deferred debt issuance adjustment             —                —                —                —                —                —                20.9                24.5   
    Senior notes debt adjustment             —                —                —                —                —                —                2.8                3.4   
    Adjusted average debt             6,583.8                6,398.3                6,202.5                6,071.1                5,818.2                5,306.8                5,010.0                4,859.3   
    GAAP average shareholders’ equity             1,635.9                1,782.0                1,712.3                1,594.2                1,623.5                1,678.5                1,734.3                1,731.3   
    Senior notes equity adjustment             —                —                —                —                —                —                2.0                2.9   
    Income tax adjustment (4)             (100.5)               (118.5)               (118.5)               (118.5)               (118.5)               (118.5)               (118.5)               (118.5)  
    Floating yield adjustment             813.5                820.8                837.0                840.8                710.1                641.0                606.5                548.9   
    Adjusted average equity             2,348.9                2,484.3                2,430.8                2,316.5                2,215.1                2,201.0                2,224.3                2,164.6   
    Adjusted average capital   $         8,932.7      $         8,882.6      $         8,633.3      $         8,387.6      $         8,033.3      $         7,507.8      $         7,234.3      $         7,023.9   
    Adjusted revenue as a percentage of adjusted average capital (5)             18.3  %             18.0  %             18.4  %             18.2  %             19.6  %             19.8  %             20.2  %             20.7  %
    Adjusted loans receivable                                
    GAAP loans receivable, net   $         8,001.9      $         7,978.2      $         7,850.3      $         7,781.5      $         7,547.7      $         7,345.6      $         6,955.3      $         6,780.5   
    Floating yield adjustment             1,096.4                1,079.8                1,072.4                1,100.8                1,065.6                869.7                803.8                748.9   
    Adjusted loans receivable   $         9,098.3      $         9,058.0      $         8,922.7      $         8,882.3      $         8,613.3      $         8,215.3      $         7,759.1      $         7,529.4   
    Adjusted loan yield                                
    GAAP finance charges   $         540.7      $         526.7      $         518.2      $         507.6      $         497.7      $         469.2      $         451.6      $         441.7   
    Floating yield adjustment             (156.0)               (154.5)               (151.8)               (149.4)               (124.8)               (120.0)               (108.9)               (99.3)  
    Adjusted finance charges   $         384.7      $         372.2      $         366.4      $         358.2      $         372.9      $         349.2      $         342.7      $         342.4   
                                     
    GAAP average loans receivable, net   $         8,011.6      $         7,882.4      $         7,831.4      $         7,690.9      $         7,499.2      $         7,101.3      $         6,867.8      $         6,690.8   
    Average floating yield adjustment             1,064.1                1,048.9                1,071.4                1,072.2                903.2                819.7                775.6                701.0   
    Adjusted average loans receivable   $         9,075.7      $         8,931.3      $         8,902.8      $         8,763.1      $         8,402.4      $         7,921.0      $         7,643.4      $         7,391.8   
    Adjusted finance charges as a percentage of adjusted average loans receivable (5)             17.0  %             16.7  %             16.5  %             16.4  %             17.8  %             17.6  %             17.9  %             18.5  %

    (1)   The sale of one of our two office buildings in June 2024 resulted in a loss on the sale of the asset. As this transaction is both unusual and infrequent in nature, we applied this adjustment to remove the impact of the loss on sale of building from our adjusted net income.
    (2)   Adjustment to record taxes at our estimated long-term effective income tax rate. The adjustment for the three months ended June 30, 2025 is calculated using a 25% income tax rate, which is expected to be used for the remainder of 2025 and future periods. This rate represents an increase from 23%, which had been used to calculate after-tax adjustments since 2018, following the enactment in December 2017 of Public Law 115-97, commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “2017 Tax Act”). The increase in our long-term estimate was due to higher state and local income taxes in certain jurisdictions and lower excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation.
    (3)   Net income per diluted share is computed independently for each of the quarters presented. Therefore, the sum of quarterly net income per diluted share information may not equal year-to-date net income per diluted share.
    (4)   The enactment of the 2017 Tax Act resulted in the reversal of provision for income taxes to reflect a new, lower federal statutory income tax rate. We began applying the income tax adjustment at that time to remove the impact of this reversal from adjusted average capital. As the enactment of Public Law 119-21 on July 4, 2025 made the lower federal statutory tax rate permanent, removing uncertainty on the future federal statutory income tax rate, we increased our estimated long-term effective income tax rate from 23% to 25% to reflect higher expected state and local income taxes in certain jurisdictions and lower excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation in future periods. We believe the income tax adjustment provides a more accurate reflection of the performance of our business as we are recognizing provision for income taxes at the applicable long-term effective tax rate for the period.
    (5)   Annualized.

    (Dollars in millions)   For the Three Months Ended
        Jun. 30, 2025   Mar. 31, 2025   Dec. 31, 2024   Sept. 30, 2024   Jun. 30, 2024   Mar. 31, 2024   Dec. 31, 2023   Sept. 30, 2023
    Adjusted interest expense (after-tax)                                
    GAAP interest expense   $         118.1      $         114.7      $         111.3      $         111.2      $         104.5      $         92.5      $         78.8      $         70.5   
    Senior notes adjustment             —                —                —                —                —                —                3.5                0.7   
    Adjusted interest expense (pre-tax)             118.1                114.7                111.3                111.2                104.5                92.5                82.3                71.2   
    Adjustment to record tax effect (1)             (29.5)               (26.4)               (25.6)               (25.6)               (24.0)               (21.3)               (18.9)               (16.4)  
    Adjusted interest expense (after-tax)   $         88.6      $         88.3      $         85.7      $         85.6      $         80.5      $         71.2      $         63.4      $         54.8   
                                     
    Adjusted return on capital (2)                                
    Adjusted net income   $         100.8      $         114.8      $         126.0      $         109.1      $         126.4      $         117.4      $         129.1      $         139.5   
    Adjusted interest expense (after-tax)             88.6                88.3                85.7                85.6                80.5                71.2                63.4                54.8   
    Adjusted net income plus adjusted interest expense (after-tax)   $         189.4      $         203.1      $         211.7      $         194.7      $         206.9      $         188.6      $         192.5      $         194.3   
                                     
    Reconciliation of GAAP return on equity to adjusted return on capital (5)                                
    GAAP return on equity (3)             21.4  %             23.9  %             35.5  %             19.8  %             -11.6  %             15.3  %             21.6  %             16.4  %
    Non-GAAP adjustments             -29.9  %             -14.7  %             -25.7  %             -10.5  %             21.9  %             -5.2  %             -11.0  %             -5.3  %
    Adjusted return on capital (2)             8.5  %             9.2  %             9.8  %             9.3  %             10.3  %             10.1  %             10.6  %             11.1  %
                                     
    Economic profit                                
    Adjusted return on capital             8.5  %             9.2  %             9.8  %             9.3  %             10.3  %             10.1  %             10.6  %             11.1  %
    Cost of capital (4) (5)             7.4  %             7.6  %             7.4  %             7.3  %             7.5  %             7.3  %             7.6  %             7.1  %
    Adjusted return on capital in excess of cost of capital             1.1  %             1.6  %             2.4  %             2.0  %             2.8  %             2.8  %             3.0  %             4.0  %
    Adjusted average capital   $         8,932.7      $         8,882.6      $         8,633.3      $         8,387.6      $         8,033.3      $         7,507.8      $         7,234.3      $         7,023.9   
        Economic profit   $         24.4      $         35.3      $         51.3      $         41.4      $         56.2      $         51.4      $         55.9      $         69.1   
                                     
    Reconciliation of GAAP net income (loss) to economic profit                                
    GAAP net income (loss)   $         87.4      $         106.3      $         151.9      $         78.8      $         (47.1)     $         64.3      $         93.6      $         70.8   
    Non-GAAP adjustments             13.4                8.5                (25.9)               30.3                173.5                53.1                35.5                68.7   
    Adjusted net income             100.8                114.8                126.0                109.1                126.4                117.4                129.1                139.5   
    Adjusted interest expense (after-tax)             88.6                88.3                85.7                85.6                80.5                71.2                63.4                54.8   
    Adjusted net income plus adjusted interest expense (after-tax)             189.4                203.1                211.7                194.7                206.9                188.6                192.5                194.3   
    Less: cost of capital             165.0                167.8                160.4                153.3                150.7                137.2                136.6                125.2   
    Economic profit   $         24.4      $         35.3      $         51.3      $         41.4      $         56.2      $         51.4      $         55.9      $         69.1   
                                     
    Economic profit per diluted share (6)   $         2.07      $         2.87      $         4.14      $         3.33      $         4.58      $         4.06      $         4.35      $         5.30   
    Operating expenses as a percentage of adjusted average capital (5)             7.0  %             6.1  %             5.6  %             6.2  %             6.2  %             6.7  %             6.3  %             6.3  %
    Percentage change in adjusted average capital compared to the same period in the prior year             11.2  %             18.3  %             19.3  %             19.4  %             17.6  %             14.6  %             11.5  %             8.8  %

    (1)   Adjustment to record taxes at our estimated long-term effective income tax rate. The adjustment for the three months ended June 30, 2025 is calculated using a 25% income tax rate, which is expected to be used for the remainder of 2025 and future periods. This rate represents an increase from 23%, which had been used to calculate after-tax adjustments since 2018, following the enactment of the 2017 Tax Act. The increase in our long-term estimate was due to higher state and local income taxes in certain jurisdictions and lower excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation.
    (2)   Adjusted return on capital is defined as adjusted net income plus adjusted interest expense (after-tax) divided by adjusted average capital.
    (3)        Calculated by dividing GAAP net income (loss) by GAAP average shareholders’ equity.

    (4)   The cost of capital includes both a cost of equity and a cost of debt.  The cost of equity capital is determined based on a formula that considers the risk of the business and the risk associated with our use of debt.  The formula utilized for determining the cost of equity capital is as follows: (the average 30-year Treasury rate + 5%) + [(1 – tax rate) x (the average 30-year Treasury rate + 5% – pre-tax average cost of debt rate) x average debt/(average equity + average debt x tax rate)].  For the periods presented, the average 30-year Treasury rate and the adjusted pre-tax average cost of debt were as follows:

        For the Three Months Ended
        Jun. 30, 2025   Mar. 31, 2025   Dec. 31, 2024   Sept. 30, 2024   Jun. 30, 2024   Mar. 31, 2024   Dec. 31, 2023   Sept. 30, 2023
    Average 30-year Treasury rate           4.8  %           4.7  %           4.4  %           4.3  %           4.6  %          4.3  %           4.7  %           4.2  %
    Pre-tax average cost of debt (5)           7.2  %           7.2  %           7.2  %           7.3  %           7.2  %           7.0  %           6.3  %           5.9  %

    (5)   Annualized.
    (6)   Economic profit per diluted share is computed independently for each of the quarters presented. Therefore, the sum of quarterly economic profit per diluted share information may not equal year-to-date economic profit per diluted share.

    Floating Yield Adjustment

    The net loan income (finance charge revenue less provision for credit losses expense) that we recognize over the life of a loan equals the cash we collect from the underlying Consumer Loan less the cash we pay to the dealer. We believe the economics of our business are best exhibited by recognizing loan revenue on a level-yield basis over the life of the loan based on expected future net cash flows. The purpose of this non-GAAP adjustment is to provide insight into our business by showing this level yield measure of income. Under GAAP, contractual amounts due in excess of the loan receivable balance at the time of assignment will be reflected as interest income, while contractual amounts due that are not expected to be collected are reflected in the provision for credit losses. Our non-GAAP floating yield adjustment recognizes the net effects of contractual interest income and expected credit losses in a single measure of finance charge revenue, consistent with how we manage our business. The floating yield adjustment recognizes revenue on a level-yield basis based upon expected future net cash flows, with any changes in expected future net cash flows, which are recognized immediately under GAAP as provision for credit losses, recognized over the remaining forecast period (up to 120 months after the origination date of the underlying Consumer Loans) for each individual dealer loan and purchased loan. The floating yield adjustment does not accelerate revenue recognition. Rather, it reduces revenue by taking amounts that are reported under GAAP as provision for credit losses and instead treating them as reductions of revenue over time.

    Under the GAAP methodology we employ, which is known as the current expected credit loss model, or CECL, we are required to recognize:

    • a significant provision for credit losses expense at the time of the loan’s assignment to us for contractual net cash flows we do not expect to realize; and
    • finance charge revenue in subsequent periods that is significantly in excess of our expected yield.

    Due to the GAAP treatment of contractual net cash flows we do not expect to realize at the time of loan assignment (i.e. significant expense at the time of loan assignment, which is offset by higher revenue in subsequent periods), we do not believe the GAAP methodology we employ provides sufficient transparency into the economics of our business, including our results of operations, financial condition, and financial leverage. Our floating yield adjustment enables us to provide measures of income that are not impacted by GAAP’s treatment of contractual net cash flows we do not expect to realize at the time of loan assignment. We believe the floating yield adjustment is presented in a manner which reflects both the economic reality of our business and how the business is managed and provides valuable supplemental information to help investors better understand our business, executive compensation, liquidity, and capital resources.

    Senior Notes Adjustment (applied in periods prior to December 31, 2023)

    This non-GAAP adjustment modifies our GAAP financial results to treat the issuance of certain senior notes as a refinancing of certain previously issued senior notes. Our historical adjusted financial information reflects application of the senior notes adjustment as described below in connection with (i) the issuance by us in 2014 of $300.0 million principal amount of 6.125% senior notes due 2021 (the “2021 senior notes”) and the related retirement of our 9.125% senior notes due 2017 (the “2017 senior notes”) and (ii) the issuance by us in 2019 of $400.0 million principal amount of 5.125% senior notes due 2024 (the “2024 senior notes”) and the related retirement of the 2021 senior notes and our 7.375% senior notes due 2023 (the “2023 senior notes”).

    We issued the 2024 senior notes on December 18, 2019. We used a portion of the net proceeds from the 2024 senior notes to repurchase or redeem all of the $300.0 million outstanding principal amount of the 2021 senior notes, of which $148.2 million was repurchased on December 18, 2019 and the remaining $151.8 million was redeemed on January 17, 2020. We used the remaining net proceeds from the 2024 senior notes, together with borrowings under our revolving credit facility, to redeem in full the $250.0 million outstanding principal amount of the 2023 senior notes on March 15, 2020. Under GAAP, the fourth quarter of 2019 included (i) a pre-tax loss on extinguishment of debt of $1.8 million related to the repurchase of 2021 senior notes in the fourth quarter of 2019 and the redemption of the remaining 2021 senior notes in the first quarter of 2020 and (ii) additional interest expense of $0.3 million on $160.0 million of additional outstanding debt caused by the one month lag from the issuance of the 2024 senior notes and repurchase of 2021 senior notes in the fourth quarter of 2019 to the redemption of the remaining 2021 senior notes in the first quarter of 2020. Under GAAP, the first quarter of 2020 included (i) a pre-tax loss on extinguishment of debt of $7.4 million related to the redemption of 2023 senior notes in the first quarter of 2020 and (ii) additional interest expense of $0.4 million on $160.0 million of additional outstanding debt caused by the one month lag from the issuance of the 2024 senior notes and repurchase of 2021 senior notes in the fourth quarter of 2019 to the redemption of the remaining 2021 senior notes in the first quarter of 2020.

    We issued the 2021 senior notes on January 22, 2014. On February 21, 2014, we used the net proceeds from the 2021 senior notes, together with borrowings under our revolving credit facilities, to redeem in full the $350.0 million outstanding principal amount of the 2017 senior notes. Under GAAP, the first quarter of 2014 included (i) a pre-tax loss on extinguishment of debt of $21.8 million related to the redemption of the 2017 senior notes in the first quarter of 2014 and (ii) additional interest expense of $1.4 million on $276.0 million of additional outstanding debt caused by the one month lag from the issuance of the 2021 senior notes to the redemption of the 2017 senior notes.

    Under our non-GAAP approach, the loss on extinguishment of debt and additional interest expense that were recognized for GAAP purposes were in each case deferred as debt issuance costs to be recognized ratably as interest expense over the term of the newly issued notes. In addition, for adjusted average capital purposes, the impact of additional outstanding debt related to the lag from the issuance of the new notes to the redemption of the previously issued notes was in each case deferred to be recognized ratably over the term of the newly issued notes. Upon the issuance of the 2024 senior notes in the fourth quarter of 2019, the outstanding unamortized balances of the non-GAAP adjustments related to the 2021 senior notes were deferred and were recognized ratably over the term of the 2024 senior notes, until the repurchase and redemption of the 2024 senior notes in December 2023.

    We believe the application of the senior notes adjustment as described above provides a more accurate reflection of the performance of our business, since we were recognizing the costs incurred with these transactions in a manner consistent with how we recognize the costs incurred when we periodically refinance our other debt facilities. We have determined not to apply the senior notes adjustments in connection with (i) the issuance by us in December 2023 of our 9.250% senior notes due 2028 and the related retirement of the 2024 senior notes or (ii) the issuance by us in February 2025 of our 6.625% senior notes due 2030 and the related retirement of the 2026 senior notes, because the adjustments would not be material.

    Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information

    We claim the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 for all of our forward-looking statements. Statements in this release that are not historical facts, such as those using terms like “may,” “will,” “should,” “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “assume,” “forecast,” “estimate,” “intend,” “plan,” “target,” or similar expressions, and those regarding our future results, plans, and objectives, are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the federal securities laws. These forward-looking statements represent our outlook only as of the date of this release. Actual results could differ materially from these forward-looking statements since the statements are based on our current expectations, which are subject to risks and uncertainties. Factors that might cause such a difference include, but are not limited to, the factors set forth in Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on February 12, 2025, and Item 1A in Part II of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2025, filed with the SEC on July 31, 2025, and other risk factors discussed herein or listed from time to time in our reports filed with the SEC and the following:

    Industry, Operational, and Macroeconomic Risks

    • Our inability to accurately forecast and estimate the amount and timing of future collections could have a material adverse effect on results of operations.
    • Due to competition from traditional financing sources and non-traditional lenders, we may not be able to compete successfully.
    • Adverse changes in economic conditions, the automobile or finance industries, or the non-prime consumer market could adversely affect our financial position, liquidity, and results of operations, the ability of key vendors that we depend on to supply us with services, and our ability to enter into future financing transactions.
    • Reliance on third parties to administer our ancillary product offerings could adversely affect our business and financial results.
    • We are dependent on our senior management, and the loss of any of these individuals or an inability to hire additional team members could adversely affect our ability to operate profitably.
    • Our reputation is a key asset to our business, and our business may be affected by how we are perceived in the marketplace.
    • An outbreak of contagious disease or other public health emergency could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, liquidity, and results of operations.
    • The concentration in several states of automobile dealers who participate in our programs could adversely affect us.
    • Reliance on our outsourced business functions could adversely affect our business.
    • Our ability to hire and retain foreign engineering personnel could be hindered by immigration restrictions.
    • We may be unable to execute our business strategy due to current economic conditions.
    • Natural disasters, climate change, military conflicts, acts of war, terrorist attacks and threats, or the escalation of military activity in response to terrorist attacks or otherwise may negatively affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
    • Governmental or market responses to climate change and related environmental issues could have a material adverse effect on our business.
    • A small number of our shareholders have the ability to significantly influence matters requiring shareholder approval and such shareholders have interests which may conflict with the interests of our other security holders.

    Capital and Liquidity Risks

    • We may be unable to continue to access or renew funding sources and obtain capital needed to maintain and grow our business.
    • The terms of our debt limit how we conduct our business.
    • A violation of the terms of our asset-backed secured financings or revolving secured warehouse facilities could have a material adverse impact on our operations.
    • Our substantial debt could negatively impact our business, prevent us from satisfying our debt obligations, and adversely affect our financial condition.
    • We may not be able to generate sufficient cash flows to service our outstanding debt and fund operations and may be forced to take other actions to satisfy our obligations under such debt.
    • Interest rate fluctuations may adversely affect our borrowing costs, profitability, and liquidity.
    • Reduction in our credit rating could increase the cost of our funding from, and restrict our access to, the capital markets and adversely affect our liquidity, financial condition, and results of operations.
    • We may incur substantially more debt and other liabilities. This could exacerbate further the risks associated with our current debt levels.
    • The conditions of the U.S. and international capital markets may adversely affect lenders with which we have relationships, causing us to incur additional costs and reducing our sources of liquidity, which may adversely affect our financial position, liquidity, and results of operations.

    Technology and Cybersecurity Risks

    • Our dependence on technology could have a material adverse effect on our business.
    • We depend on secure information technology, and a breach of our systems or those of our third-party service providers could result in our experiencing significant financial, legal, and reputational exposure and could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
    • Our use of electronic contracts could impact our ability to perfect our ownership or security interest in Consumer Loans.
    • Failure to properly safeguard our proprietary business information or confidential consumer and team member personal information could subject us to liability, decrease our profitability, and damage our reputation.
    • The development and use of artificial intelligence presents risks and challenges that may adversely impact our business.

    Legal and Regulatory Risks

    • Litigation we are involved in from time to time may adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.
    • Changes in tax laws and the resolution of uncertain income tax matters could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and cash flows from operations.
    • The regulations to which we are or may become subject could result in a material adverse effect on our business.

    Other factors not currently anticipated by management may also materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations. We do not undertake, and expressly disclaim any obligation, to update or alter our statements, whether as a result of new information or future events or otherwise, except as required by applicable law.

    Webcast Details

    We will host a webcast on July 31, 2025 at 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time to discuss our second quarter results. The webcast can be accessed live by visiting the “Investor Relations” section of our website at ir.creditacceptance.com or by telephone as described below. Only persons accessing the webcast by telephone will be able to pose questions to the presenters during the webcast. A replay and transcript of the webcast will be archived in the “Investor Relations” section of our website. 

    To participate in the webcast by telephone, you must pre-register at https://register.vevent.com/register/BIdf2e1302737241fd92014eec2b76a62f, or through the link posted on the “Investor Relations” section of our website at ir.creditacceptance.com. Upon registration you will be provided with the dial-in number and a unique PIN to access the webcast by telephone.

    Description of Credit Acceptance Corporation

    We make vehicle ownership possible by providing innovative financing solutions that enable automobile dealers to sell vehicles to consumers regardless of their credit history. Our financing programs are offered through a nationwide network of automobile dealers who benefit from sales of vehicles to consumers who otherwise could not obtain financing; from repeat and referral sales generated by these same customers; and from sales to customers responding to advertisements for our financing programs, but who actually end up qualifying for traditional financing.

    Without our financing programs, consumers are often unable to purchase vehicles or they purchase unreliable ones. Further, as we report to the three national credit reporting agencies, an important ancillary benefit of our programs is that we provide consumers with an opportunity to improve their lives by improving their credit score and move on to more traditional sources of financing. Credit Acceptance is publicly traded on the Nasdaq Stock Market under the symbol CACC. For more information, visit creditacceptance.com.

    CREDIT ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION
    CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
    (UNAUDITED)
            

    (Dollars in millions, except per share data) For the Three Months Ended June 30,
        2025     2024  
    Revenue:      
    Finance charges $         540.7    $         497.7   
    Premiums earned           24.1              24.3   
    Other income           19.0              16.2   
    Total revenue           583.8              538.2   
    Costs and expenses:      
    Salaries and wages           83.7              75.8   
    General and administrative           45.2              23.2   
    Sales and marketing           26.6              25.4   
    Total operating expenses           155.5              124.4   
           
    Provision for credit losses on forecast changes           101.3              237.8   
    Provision for credit losses on new Consumer Loan assignments           71.3              82.8   
    Total provision for credit losses           172.6              320.6   
           
    Interest           118.1              104.5   
    Provision for claims           19.8              20.3   
    Loss on sale of building           —              23.7   
    Total costs and expenses           466.0              593.5   
           Income (loss) before provision for income taxes           117.8              (55.3)  
    Provision (benefit) for income taxes           30.4              (8.2)  
           Net income (loss) $         87.4    $         (47.1)  
           
    Net income (loss) per share:      
    Basic $         7.55    $         (3.83)  
    Diluted $         7.42    $         (3.83)  
           
    Weighted average shares outstanding:      
    Basic           11,574,018              12,282,174   
    Diluted           11,771,525              12,282,174   

    CREDIT ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION
    CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
    (UNAUDITED)

    (Dollars in millions, except per share data) As of
      June 30, 2025   December 31, 2024
    ASSETS:      
    Cash and cash equivalents $         70.0      $         343.7   
    Restricted cash and cash equivalents           493.8                501.3   
    Restricted securities available for sale           107.1                106.4   
           
    Loans receivable           11,563.0                11,289.1   
    Allowance for credit losses           (3,561.1)               (3,438.8)  
    Loans receivable, net           8,001.9                7,850.3   
           
    Property and equipment, net           13.2                14.7   
    Income taxes receivable           9.4                4.2   
    Other assets           29.2                34.0   
    Total assets $         8,724.6      $         8,854.6   
           
    LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY:      
    Liabilities:      
    Accounts payable and accrued liabilities $         378.8      $         315.8   
    Revolving secured lines of credit           1.5                0.1   
    Secured financing           5,383.3                5,361.5   
    Senior notes           1,086.4                991.3   
    Deferred income taxes, net           306.1                319.1   
    Income taxes payable           13.8                117.2   
    Total liabilities           7,169.9                7,105.0   
           
    Shareholders’ Equity:      
    Preferred stock, $.01 par value, 1,000,000 shares authorized, none issued           —                —   
    Common stock, $.01 par value, 80,000,000 shares authorized, 11,237,396 and 12,048,151 shares issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024, respectively           0.1                0.1   
    Paid-in capital           369.3                335.1   
    Retained earnings           1,184.3                1,414.7   
    Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)           1.0                (0.3)  
    Total shareholders’ equity           1,554.7                1,749.6   
    Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity $         8,724.6      $         8,854.6   

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI: StoneX Completes Acquisition of R.J. O’Brien, Becoming the Largest Non-Bank FCM in the United States and Enhancing Global Multi-Asset Capabilities

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    NEW YORK, July 31, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — StoneX Group Inc. (NASDAQ: SNEX) (“StoneX” or the “Company”), today announced the successful completion of its previously announced acquisition of R.J. O’Brien (“RJO”), the oldest independent futures brokerage in the United States. This transformative acquisition makes StoneX the largest non-bank Futures Commission Merchant (“FCM”) in the U.S. and positions the company as a market leader in global derivatives.

    Founded in 1914, RJO supports over 75,000 client accounts and serves the industry’s largest global network of approximately 300 introducing brokers (“IBs”), as well as commercial and institutional clients, and individual investors. RJO brings an attractive financial profile to StoneX, having generated $766 million in revenue and approximately $170 million in EBITDA during calendar 2024.

    As a combined company, StoneX provides clients with access to nearly every major global derivatives exchange, and offers one of the most comprehensive multi-asset platforms in the industry. RJO’s clients can now access StoneX’s extensive range of markets, products, and services, including an expansive over-the-counter (“OTC”) hedging platform, physical commodity hedging, financing, and logistics services, as well as access to deep liquidity across fixed income products.

    Through the integration of the two companies, StoneX has targeted significant revenue synergies via cross-sell opportunities in OTC derivatives, physical commodity trading, and fixed income products. StoneX has also targeted $50 million in expense savings and unlocking at least $50 million in capital synergies through operational consolidation. The acquisition, which expands StoneX’s client float by nearly $6 billion, is expected to enhance StoneX’s margins, return on equity and be accretive to earnings.

    “This is a proud moment for both companies. With more than 200 years of combined futures and commodities expertise, we are strengthening StoneX’s role as an integral part of the global financial infrastructure,” said Sean O’Connor, Executive Vice-Chairman of StoneX. “This acquisition creates an unmatched knowledge base and reinforces our position as the counterparty of choice for clients.”

    Philip Smith, Chief Executive Officer of StoneX, added: “This transaction significantly expands our scale and increases our capabilities in several critical areas, including through a materially expanded client network and the addition of the leading introducing broker business. The combination of the companies’ leading technologies and tools, such as in OTC hedging, risk management, and trading execution and liquidity across multiple asset classes, will deliver clients important benefits. This transaction adds significant value for our clients and reinforces our ability to deliver across asset classes through every market cycle.”

    Gerry Corcoran, Chairman and CEO of RJO, said: “Today marks an exciting milestone as RJO joins StoneX to deliver broader services and greater reach to our clients. We will continue to deliver the same level of outstanding and personalized service we’ve always provided – now on an even larger scale with more extensive resources. We couldn’t be more pleased about the cultural fit and strong client-first approach at StoneX that mirrors RJO’s philosophy.”

    Speaking on behalf of the O’Brien family, the majority shareholders in RJO, Board member John O’Brien, Jr. said: “We are incredibly proud of our heritage in the futures industry spanning nearly 111 years, along with the clients we’ve served and the industry we helped grow. We are grateful for the thousands of employees who have met our clients’ needs so faithfully for all these years. And now, as we embark on the next chapter of this amazing story, we are confident that StoneX will carry on the important legacy of both firms while building a leading multi-asset global organization for the future.”

    About StoneX Group Inc.

    StoneX Group Inc., through its subsidiaries, operates a global financial services network that connects companies, organizations, traders and investors to the global market ecosystem through a unique blend of digital platforms, end-to-end clearing and execution services, high touch service and deep expertise. The Company strives to be the one trusted partner for its clients, providing its network, product and services to allow them to pursue trading opportunities, manage their market risks, make investments and improve their business performance. A Fortune 50 company headquartered in New York City and listed on the Nasdaq Global Select Market (NASDAQ: SNEX), StoneX Group Inc. and its more than 4,700 employees serve more than 54,000 commercial, institutional, and global payments clients, and more than 260,000 self-directed/retail accounts, from more than 80 offices spread across six continents. Further information on the Company is available at www.stonex.com.

    About R.J. O’Brien

    Founded in 1914, R.J. O’Brien & Associates is one of the leading futures brokerage and clearing firms in the United States, serving more than 75,000 institutional, commercial and individual clients globally, in addition to a network of approximately 300 IBs. RJO services the industry’s most expansive global network of IBs, a vast array of middle market firms and many of the world’s largest financial, industrial and agricultural institutions. The firm offers state-of-the-art electronic trading and 24-hour trade execution on every major futures exchange worldwide. RJO received the FOW International Award for Non-Bank FCM of the Year for five consecutive years, and the firm and its UK affiliate have earned eight honors from the HFM Global publications (now With Intelligence) in recent years.

    Press Inquiries: stonex@cognitomedia.com

    Investor Relations Inquiries: Kevin.Murphy@stonex.com

    Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

    Statements in this release that are not historical facts are “forward-looking” statements and “safe harbor statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 that involve risks and/or uncertainties, including those described in StoneX’s public filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Forward-looking statements are based on management’s current expectations and assumptions and not on historical facts. Examples of these statements include, but are not limited to, statements about the benefits of the proposed acquisition of RJO, including expected synergies and future financial and operating results, the plans, objectives, expectations and intentions of StoneX after the acquisition, the expected timing to close the acquisition and the expected use of proceeds of any debt financing. Because forward-looking statements relate to the future, they are subject to inherent uncertainties, risks, and changes in circumstances that are difficult to predict. Our actual results may differ materially from those contemplated by the forward-looking statements. They are neither statements of historical fact nor guarantees or assurances of future performance. Therefore, we caution you against relying on any of these forward-looking statements. Among the important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated in such forward-looking statements include the risks related to the proposed acquisition and the integration of RJO as well as the risks and other factors described in StoneX’s periodic reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. In providing forward-looking statements, StoneX is not undertaking any duty or obligation to update these statements publicly as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law. If StoneX updates one or more forward-looking statements, no inference should be drawn that it will make additional updates with respect to those other forward-looking statements.

    SNEX-G

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI USA: Reed Presses for Release of Epstein Files

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Rhode Island Jack Reed

    WASHINGTON, DC – This week, President Trump’s former personal defense attorney and current high-ranking DOJ lawyer Todd Blanche was dispatched to conduct a private jailhouse interview with Jeffrey Epstein’s associate Ghislaine Maxwell, who President Trump knew personally. Ms. Maxwell is serving a 20 year federal sentence for her role in the sex trafficking of young women and girls, and President Trump has refused to rule out a presidential pardon for her. During the 2020 campaign, Trump said that he “wishes her well.”

    In an effort to restore public trust and ensure the American public knows what information is in the Epstein files, U.S. Senator Jack Reed (D-RI) is teaming up with Senator Jeff Merkley (D-OR) and several colleagues on legislation to direct the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) to publicly release all files relating to the investigation of dead sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein and his associates. There would be common-sense protections against disclosure of information that would compromise the privacy and safety of victims and witnesses. However, information could not be withheld to protect someone’s reputation or for political sensitivities—on both sides of the aisle.

    The Epstein Files Transparency Act would provide full transparency for the American people, accountability for individuals involved with Epstein, and justice for all victims harmed. The bill mandates that within 30 days of its enactment, the U.S. Attorney General must release all unclassified records, documents, communications, and investigative materials related to the Jeffrey Epstein case held by the Department of Justice, including files from the FBI and U.S. Attorneys’ Offices.

    “The rich and powerful cannot use their influence, money, and connections to cover up the abuse of our most vulnerable,” said Senator Merkley. “We have a government of ‘We the People,’ not ‘We the Powerful.’ To restore the public’s trust, the American people deserve the truth about Jeffrey Epstein and those connected to him.”

    “Like his promise to lower prices, President Trump wants to renege on his pledge to release the Epstein files. Once again, he’s failed to deliver. The American people deserve answers, the victims deserve justice, and it’s past time for Congressional Republicans to hold the Executive branch accountable,” said Senator Reed. “Instead of lifting a finger to release the Epstein files, President Trump is doing everything he can to prevent them from coming out. The American people deserve truth and accountability. The records should be transparently released and there should be zero tolerance for abuse of power and sex trafficking of innocent underage victims.”

    The Senate bill compliments the bipartisan House bill (H.Res.581) introduced by Congressmen Thomas Massie (R-KY) and Ro Khanna (D-CA).

    Last week, House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) suspended all House business until September rather than endure a vote on the Massie-Khanna resolution calling for transparent disclosure of the Epstein files.

    In addition to Merkley and Reed, the Epstein Files Transparency Act is also co-sponsored by U.S. Senators Ben Ray Luján (D-NM), Dick Durbin (D-IL), Cory Booker (D-NJ), Adam Schiff (D-CA), Martin Heinrich (D-NM), John Hickenlooper (D-CO), Richard Blumenthal (D-CT), Chris Van Hollen (D-MD), Ruben Gallego (D-AZ), Andy Kim (D-NJ), Mark Kelly (D-AZ), Angela Alsobrooks (D-MD), Peter Welch (D-VT), Mark Warner (D-VA), Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH), Chris Coons (D-DE), Ron Wyden (D-OR), Mazie Hirono (D-HI), Bernie Sanders (I-VT), Tammy Duckworth (D-IL), and Michael Bennet (D-CO).

    Sponsors of the bill are working to ensure the Senate considers it in a timely manner and before the Senate Republicans adjourn the chamber for its August district work period.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Newly Declassified Appendix to Durham Report Sheds Additional Light on Clinton Campaign Plan to Falsely Tie Trump to Russia and FBI’s Failure to Investigate

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Iowa Chuck Grassley

    WASHINGTON – Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) today is making public the formerly Classified Appendix (“Durham annex”) to John Durham’s 2023 Special Counsel report. The Unclassified Report and the Classified Appendix form the entirety of Durham’s Special Counsel Report.

    The Durham annex contains previously classified information exposing a reported Clinton campaign plan to falsely tie President Donald Trump to Russia.

    The annex also goes into further detail on matters discussed in the Unclassified Report, specifically:

    • The FBI’s failure – under the leadership of then-Director James Comey – to investigate intelligence that the Clinton campaign may have created the Russia collusion hoax. Meanwhile the Comey-led FBI used the Steele Dossier – a Clinton campaign creation – to obtain FISA warrants on Carter Page.

    Attorney General Pam Bondi, Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Director Kash Patel and Intelligence Community elements declassified the Durham annex at Grassley’s request. In requesting its declassification, which included declassification of information by the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and National Security Agency (NSA), Grassley argued that “the overriding public interest demands the release of this information, and doing so would benefit public transparency and accountability.”

    “Based on the Durham annex, the Obama FBI failed to adequately review and investigate intelligence reports showing the Clinton campaign may have been ginning up the fake Trump-Russia narrative for Clinton’s political gain, which was ultimately done through the Steele Dossier and other means. These intelligence reports and related records, whether true or false, were buried for years. History will show that the Obama and Biden administration’s law enforcement and intelligence agencies were weaponized against President Trump. This political weaponization has caused critical damage to our institutions and is one of the biggest political scandals and cover-ups in American history. The new Trump administration has a tremendous responsibility to the American people to fix the damage done and do so with maximum speed and transparency,” Grassley said.

    “For years, I’ve fought to assemble and publicize all the facts surrounding Durham’s investigation, Crossfire Hurricane and related matters. The American people shouldn’t be shortchanged or strung out on matters of significant public interest, and that firm belief fuels my tireless oversight. It’s been a refreshing change to see Attorney General Bondi and Director Patel’s increased efforts to bring transparency to a very dark corner of the people’s government. I hope that attitude continues, and you can be sure my oversight work will continue as well, because there’s much work yet to be done,” Grassley concluded.

    Read the Durham annex HERE.

    Key Findings of the Durham Annex:

    The Clinton Campaign Plan

    In 2016, the Obama administration obtained intelligence information from a source contained in two separate memoranda – one memorandum from January 2016 and another from March 2016. The two memoranda “described ‘confidential conversations’ between then-Democratic National Committee (DNC) Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz and two individuals at the [Soros] Open Society Foundations (i) [Leonard] Benardo and (ii) Jeffrey Goldstein.” (Pgs. 2-3)

    • This memo stated, in part, that “[the Democratic Party’s] opposition is focused on discrediting Trump…. [a]mong other things, the Clinton staff, with support from special services, is preparing scandalous revelations of business relations between Trump and the ‘Russian Mafia’”. (Pg. 4)

    • According to the Durham annex, based on an analysis and translation of the intelligence, FBI analysts believed that, at the time, the “special services” in the March 2016 memorandum could refer “to the FBI and the CIA or more broadly to the intelligence and law enforcement communities” in the United States, or, analysts speculated, it could refer to “Trump dossier author Christopher Steele.” (Pg. 5)

    • When the Obama administration received this intelligence in March 2016, Fusion GPS was preparing open source opposition research regarding purported ties between Trump and Russians. The research was paid for by Clinton’s campaign and the DNC. (Pg. 5).

    • Notably, on April 15, 2020, Grassley released Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General (DOJ OIG) footnotes showing that Russian intelligence was aware of Steele’s anti-Trump research in early July 2016. Further, the FBI had reports in hand in 2017 that the Dossier may have Russian sources and was potentially Russian disinformation.

    On March 31, 2016, FBI personnel, including then-Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, shared the intelligence regarding the potential Clinton Campaign Plan with high-ranking career officials at DOJ. (Pg. 5)

    FBI Receipt of Additional Intelligence Information on the Clinton Campaign Plan

    The Durham annex describes that, in July 2016, the FBI received additional intelligence regarding a possible Clinton Campaign Plan, including documents with purported emails allegedly sent by Leonard Benardo, Senior Vice President of Soros’ Open Society Foundations. The intelligence included data providing specificity on the plan and the attempt to smear then-candidate Donald Trump by falsely linking him to Russia, while apparently counting on the support of the FBI to open up an investigation. (Pgs. 7-11)

    The intelligence the FBI received also included information and analysis from purported Leonard Benardo emails that stated, in part:

    • “During the first stage of the campaign, due to lack of direct evidence, it was decided to disseminate the necessary information through the FBI-affiliated…technical structures… in particular, the Crowdstrike and ThreatConnect companies, from where the information would then be disseminated through leading U.S. publications.” (Pg. 8)

    • “The point is making the Russian play a U.S. domestic issue… In absence of direct evidence, Crowdstrike and ThreatConnect will supply the media, and GRU [Russia’s Main Intelligence Directive] will hopefully carry on to give more facts.” (Pg. 11)

    Assessment of Authenticity of the “Benardo Emails” Intelligence

    • The Durham annex states, “Analysts and officers whom [Durham’s team] interviewed, and who were well-versed in the Sensitive Intelligence collection, stated that their best assessment was that the Bernardo emails were likely authentic.” (Pg. 11)

    Durham’s team conducted investigative work to inform their assessment. Per the Durham annex:

    • Communications the Durham team reviewed provided additional support that the Clinton campaign was engaged in a plan to tie Trump to Russia and that the campaign wanted or expected the Office of the Vice President, the FBI or other parts of the Intelligence Community, such as the State Department’s Bureau of Intelligence and Research (INR), to aid that effort. (Pgs. 16-17)

    • The Durham annex states, “The Office’s best assessment is that the … emails that purport to be from Benardo were ultimately a composite of several emails that were obtained through Russian intelligence hacking of the U.S.-based Think Tanks, including the Open Society Foundations, the Carnegie Endowment, and others.” (Pg. 17)

    • The Durham annex concludes, “It is a logical deduction [redacted] [Julianne] Smith was, at minimum, playing a role in the Clinton campaign’s efforts to tie Trump to Russia,” and that the communications it reviewed “certainly lends at least some credence that such a plan existed.” (Pg. 17)

    The Obama-Biden Administration’s Response to Intelligence on the Clinton Campaign Plan

    • According to the Durham annex, following the receipt of this intelligence, multiple high-ranking U.S. officials were briefed on the matter, including an August 3, 2016 briefing in the White House by CIA Director John Brennan to President Obama, Vice President Joe Biden, Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, FBI Director Comey, among others. As described in Durham’s Unclassified Report, ultimately, the CIA sent the FBI an investigative referral that included the “purported Clinton campaign plan.” (Pg. 18)

    • In 2017, the “CIA prepared a written assessment of the authenticity and veracity of the above-referenced intelligence. The CIA stated that it did not assess that the above [redacted] memoranda, or [redacted] hacked U.S. communications, to be the product of Russian fabrications.” (Pg. 19)

    • The Durham annex notes that “FBI was fully alerted to the possibility that at least some of the information it was receiving about the Trump campaign might have its origin either with the Clinton campaign or its supporters, or alternatively, was the product of Russian disinformation.”

    • The Durham annex concludes, in part, that “[d]espite this awareness, the FBI appears to have dismissed the [intelligence information] as not credible without any investigative steps actually having been taken to either corroborate or disprove the allegations.” (Pgs. 22-24)

    The Threat of Foreign Election Influence and Assessment in FISA Renewal Applications

    As the Unclassified Durham Report noted, “[b]eginning in late 2014… the FBI learned from a well-placed Confidential Human Source that a foreign government (“Foreign Government-2”) was planning to send an individual (“Non-U.S. Person-I”) to contribute to Clinton’s anticipated presidential campaign, as a way to gain influence with Clinton should she win the presidency.”

    The Durham annex notes that “Non-U.S.Person-I” was “directly tasked by the leader of Foreign Government-2” with facilitating this plan, but had indicated plans to travel to the U.S. in late 2014.

    • However, as known from the Unclassified Durham Report, the FISA “application lingered because ‘everyone was super more careful’ and ‘scared with the big name [Clinton]’ involved.”

    • Ultimately, after four months, the FISA authority was authorized following a commitment that Clinton and others targeted by Foreign Government-2 would receive defensive briefings. (Pgs. 23-24)

    The remainder of the Durham annex reinforces that the FBI provided false and misleading information to the FISA court in pursuit of FISA renewals, and at least one Confidential Human Source lied to his handlers.

    The information in the Durham annex, taken together with previously released details in the Unclassified Report, reinforce the FBI’s disparate treatment of Trump versus Clinton. Despite lacking probable cause and relying on false information, the FBI secured a FISA warrant and multiple renewals to surveil Carter Page and did not provide Trump a defensive briefing equivalent to Clinton’s briefings.

    -30-

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Lee Bill Blocks Federal Judges from Appointing U.S. Attorneys

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Utah Mike Lee

    WASHINGTON – U.S. Senator Mike Lee (R-UT) introduced legislation today to restore the President’s right to appoint acting United States Attorneys, a power usurped by Democrats and handed to judges under arbitrary time limits, creating conflicts of interest and power imbalances within courts. U.S. Senator Josh Hawley (R-MO) cosponsored the legislation.

    “President Trump deserves to pick the people working for him,” said Senator Mike Lee. “Judges shouldn’t get to choose the US Attorney who will be arguing cases before them, just as they would never let a President name their law clerks. Congress took this provision out once before, and Democrats revived it to hamper the Bush administration almost 20 years ago. It’s time we restored this prerogative to the leader of the Executive Branch.”

    Background

    U.S. Attorneys are appointed by the President and subject to approval by the Senate. While awaiting Senate approval, the Attorney General selects an interim U.S. Attorney to serve for 120 days. If the presidential appointee is not confirmed within those 120 days, current law allows district courts to then select yet another interim U.S. Attorney – an opportunity sometimes exploited for political retaliation.

    This shift of appointment authority away from the executive branch to the courts creates a conflict of interest, weakening the separation of powers by allowing courts to select their own interim U.S. attorneys.

    Senator Lee’s legislation will correct this miscarriage of justice by restoring the authority to make U.S. attorney appointments to the executive branch.

    Read exclusive coverage by The Federalist here.

    Read the full bill text here.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Canada: British Columbia harvester fined over a million dollars and receives a six-year jail sentence for illegal fishing and sale of sea cucumber

    Source: Government of Canada News (2)

    July 31, 2025                                                                

    Nanaimo, BC – Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) is committed to the enforcement of the Fisheries Act and is working with partners to strengthen surveillance, monitoring, and prosecution of serious fisheries violations.

    The Honourable Justice Crerar of the British Columbia Supreme Court has sentenced Scott Steer, a repeat offender with a history of serious violations under the Fisheries Act, for illegal sea cucumber harvesting and sale. The sentencing follows Mr. Steer’s conviction on January 8, 2025, on multiple counts related to the unlawful harvest and sale of sea cucumbers between July 2019 and June 2020. 

    Penalties include:

    • a six-year jail sentence for Scott Steer to be served consecutively;
    • a global fine of $1,105,718 dollars ($1,005,718 and an additional $100,000 fine for the corporate offenders) for which Mr. and Mrs. Steer are jointly liable which is to be paid by monthly installment over 20 years; and
    • forfeiture of all items seized during the investigation, other than Mrs. Steer’s two phones, including two vessels, two vehicles, a trailer and many items related to fishing.

    Mr. Steer has an extensive history of fisheries violations that have resulted in numerous convictions, prohibitions, fines, and jail sentences. He had previously been prohibited by the Courts in 2016 from possessing or acquiring fishing gear, being onboard any fishing vessel, or applying for a fishing license until 2038. Despite these prohibitions, he actively orchestrated an illegal fishing operation, acquiring and outfitting vessels, recruiting crew, forging DFO records, and selling unlawfully harvested sea cucumbers.

    The court found that Mr. Steer’s illegal activities resulted in the sale of over 87,000 pounds of sea cucumbers, generating more than $1 million in revenue through fraudulent transactions with a Vancouver-based processing company. Justice Crerar determined that 1215419 B.C. Ltd. was a sham corporation used to circumvent Mr. Steer’s prohibitions and court orders, and that Mrs. Steer was fully involved in the scheme.

    Fisheries and Oceans Canada reminds the public that illegal fishing threatens the sustainability of Canada’s fisheries and urges anyone with information on potential violations to report them to DFO’s toll-free violation reporting line at 1-800-465-4336 or by email at DFO.ORR-ONS.MPO@dfo-mpo.gc.ca.

    MIL OSI Canada News

  • MIL-OSI Security: Boston Man Pleads Guilty to Failing to Register as a Sex Offender

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

    Defendant previously convicted of sodomy and assault with intent to rape a minor under 12

    BOSTON – A Boston man pleaded guilty today in federal court in Boston to failure to register as a sex offender. Defendant served in United States Navy in April 1998 when he was convicted of sodomy, assault and intent to rape a minor under the age of 12.

    Adrian Martinez, 56, pleaded guilty to one count of failing to register as a sex offender before U.S. District Court Judge Leo T. Sorokin who scheduled sentencing for Oct. 28, 2025. In April 2025, Martinez was arrested and charged.

    Martinez is a Level 3 sex offender who was previously convicted while serving in the United States Navy of: committing sodomy with a person under the age of 12; taking indecent liberties upon the body of a female under 12 years of age (4 counts); and assault with intent to rapea person under the age of 12, in violation of Uniformed Code of Military Justice.

    Following his conviction, Martinez was sentenced to a 40-year period of incarceration. Martinez served approximately 11 years of his 40 year sentence and was released from custody in February of 2009. Martinez was required to register as a sex offender and update his registration any time he moved or changed employment. At some point after Sept. 30, 2022, Martinez moved out of his Boston residence and did not notify law enforcement of his change in registered address. Boston Police attempted to contact Martinez but were unsuccessful in their attempts.

    Martinez faces a sentence of up to 10 years in prison, a minimum of five years and up to lifetime supervised release and a fine of $250,000. Sentences are imposed by a federal district court judge based upon the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and other statutory factors.

    United States Attorney Leah B. Foley and Kevin Neal, Acting United States Marshal for the District of Massachusetts made the announcement today. Assistant U.S. Attorney Luke A. Goldworm, Project Safe Childhood Coordinator and a member of the Major Crimes Unit is prosecuting the case.

    The case is brought as part of Project Safe Childhood. In 2006, the Department of Justice created Project Safe Childhood, a nationwide initiative designed to protect children from exploitation and abuse. Led by the U.S. Attorneys’ Offices and the DOJ’s Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section, Project Safe Childhood marshals federal, state and local resources to better locate, apprehend, and prosecute individuals who exploit children, as well as identify and rescue victims.  For more information about Project Safe Childhood, please visit www.projectsafechildhood.gov/.

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI: LPL Financial Announces Second Quarter 2025 Results

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Key Financial Results:

    • Net Income was $273 million, translating to diluted earnings per share (“EPS”) of $3.40, up 5% from a year ago
    • Adjusted EPS* increased 16% year-over-year to $4.51
      • Gross profit* increased 21% year-over-year to $1,304 million
      • Core G&A* increased 15% year-over-year to $426 million
      • Adjusted pre-tax income* increased 23% year-over-year to $490 million

    Key Business Results:

    • Total advisory and brokerage assets increased 28% year-over-year to $1.9 trillion
      • Advisory assets increased 28% year-over-year to $1.1 trillion
      • Advisory assets as a percentage of total assets decreased to 55.3%, down from 55.4% a year ago
    • Total organic net new assets were $21 billion, representing 5% annualized growth
      • This included $0.1 billion of assets from Wintrust Investments, LLC and certain private client business at Great Lakes Advisors, LLC (collectively, “Wintrust”), and $4 billion of assets that off-boarded as part of the previously disclosed planned separation from misaligned large OSJs. Prior to these impacts, organic net new assets were $24 billion, translating to a 5% annualized growth rate
    • Recruited assets(1)were $18 billion, down 24% from a year ago
      • Recruited assets over the trailing twelve months were $161 billion
    • Total client cash balances were $51 billion, a decrease of $2 billion sequentially and an increase of $7 billion year-over-year
      • Client cash balances as a percentage of total assets were 2.6%, down from 3.0% in the prior quarter and down from 2.9% in the prior year

    Key Capital and Liquidity Measures:

    • Corporate cash(2)was $3.6 billion
    • Leverage ratio(3)was 1.23x
    • Dividends paid were $24.0 million

    *See the Non-GAAP Financial Measures section and the endnotes to this release for further details about these non-GAAP financial measures

    Key Updates

    Large Institutions:

    • First Horizon Bank (“First Horizon”): Expect to onboard in the third quarter of 2025. First Horizon supports approximately 120 advisors, managing approximately $17 billion of brokerage and advisory assets

    M&A:

    • Atria Wealth Solutions, Inc. (“Atria”): Completed the conversion of Atria to the LPL platform
    • Commonwealth Financial Network (“Commonwealth”): Expect to close the acquisition of Commonwealth on August 1, 2025 and complete the conversion in the fourth quarter of 2026. Commonwealth supports approximately 3,000 advisors in the U.S., managing approximately $305 billion of brokerage and advisory assets(4)
    • Liquidity & Succession: Deployed approximately $105 million of capital to close nine deals in Q2, including one external practice

    Core G&A:

    • Given our performance to date, we are lowering our 2025 Core G&A* outlook to a range of $1,720-1,750 million, including $170-180 million related to Prudential and Atria
    • Additionally, we are increasing the range by $160-170 million to include costs related to the acquisition of Commonwealth, resulting in an updated range of $1,880-1,920 million

    Capital Management:

    • Debt Rating: On July 14, 2025, Fitch Ratings assigned LPL a long-term issuer default rating of BBB, further improving our profile in the investment grade market

    SAN DIEGO, July 31, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — LPL Financial Holdings Inc. (Nasdaq: LPLA) (the “Company”) today announced results for its second quarter ended June 30, 2025, reporting net income of $273 million, or $3.40 per share. This compares with $244 million, or $3.23 per share, in the second quarter of 2024 and $319 million, or $4.24 per share, in the prior quarter.

    “We continue to execute on our vision to be the best firm in wealth management,” said Rich Steinmeier, CEO. “In Q2, we delivered another quarter of strong business performance and excellent financial results, while continuing to advance key initiatives.”

    “In the second quarter, we recorded industry-leading organic growth, continued preparation to onboard First Horizon, and successfully onboarded Atria. In addition, we expect to complete our acquisition of Commonwealth tomorrow morning,” said Matt Audette, President and CFO. “Looking ahead, our business momentum and financial strength position us well to continue delivering long-term shareholder value.”

    Dividend Declaration

    The Company’s Board of Directors declared a $0.30 per share dividend to be paid on August 29, 2025 to all stockholders of record as of August 15, 2025.

    Conference Call and Additional Information

    The Company will hold a conference call to discuss its results at 5:00 p.m. ET on Thursday, July 31, 2025. The conference call will be accessible and available for replay at investor.lpl.com/events.

    Contacts

    Investor Relations
    investor.relations@lplfinancial.com

    Media Relations
    media.relations@lplfinancial.com

    About LPL Financial

    LPL Financial Holdings Inc. (Nasdaq: LPLA) is among the fastest growing wealth management firms in the U.S. As a leader in the financial advisor-mediated marketplace(5), LPL supports over 29,000 financial advisors and the wealth management practices of approximately 1,100 financial institutions, servicing and custodying approximately $1.9 trillion in brokerage and advisory assets on behalf of approximately 7 million Americans. The firm provides a wide range of advisor affiliation models, investment solutions, fintech tools and practice management services, ensuring that advisors and institutions have the flexibility to choose the business model, services, and technology resources they need to run thriving businesses. For further information about LPL, please visit https://lpl.com/.

    Securities and advisory services offered through LPL Financial LLC (“LPL Financial”) or its affiliate LPL Enterprise, LLC (“LPL Enterprise”), both registered investment advisers and broker-dealers. Members FINRA/SIPC.

    Throughout this communication, the terms “financial advisors” and “advisors” are used to refer to registered representatives and/or investment advisor representatives affiliated with LPL Financial or LPL Enterprise.

    We routinely disclose information that may be important to shareholders in the “Investor Relations” or “Press Releases” section of our website.

    Forward-Looking Statements

    This press release contains statements regarding:

    • the expected closing of the Company’s acquisition of Commonwealth, the Company’s retention of Commonwealth advisors following the closing and Commonwealth’s future financial and operating performance;
    • the amount and timing of the onboarding of acquired, recruited or transitioned brokerage and advisory assets, including Commonwealth and First Horizon;
    • the Company’s future financial and operating results, growth, plans, priorities and business strategies, including forecasts and statements related to the Company’s ICA yield, service and fee revenue, transaction revenue, tax rate, core G&A expense, promotional expense, interest expense and income, depreciation and amortization, leverage ratio (including plans to reduce leverage), payout rate, corporate cash, run-rate EBITDA, transaction revenue, operating margin and share repurchases; and
    • future capabilities, future advisor service experience, future investments and capital deployment, including share repurchase activity and dividends, if any, and long-term shareholder value.

    These and any other statements that are not related to present facts or current conditions, or that are not purely historical, constitute forward-looking statements. They reflect the Company’s expectations and objectives as of July 31, 2025 and are not guarantees that expectations or objectives expressed or implied will be achieved. The achievement of such expectations and objectives involves risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results, levels of activity or the timing of events to differ materially from those expressed or implied by forward-looking statements. Important factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include:

    • the failure to satisfy the closing conditions applicable to the Company’s purchase agreement with Commonwealth;
    • difficulties and delays in onboarding the assets of acquired, recruited or transitioned advisors, including the receipt and timing of regulatory approvals that may be required;
    • disruptions in the businesses of the Company and Commonwealth that could make it more difficult to maintain relationships with advisors and their clients;
    • the choice by clients of acquired or recruited advisors not to open brokerage and/or advisory accounts at the Company;
    • changes in general economic and financial market conditions, including retail investor sentiment;
    • changes in interest rates and fees payable by banks participating in the Company’s client cash programs, including the Company’s success in negotiating agreements with current or additional counterparties;
    • the Company’s strategy and success in managing client cash program fees;
    • fluctuations in the levels of advisory and brokerage assets, including net new assets, and the related impact on revenue;
    • effects of competition in the financial services industry and the success of the Company in attracting and retaining financial advisors and institutions, and their ability to provide financial products and services effectively;
    • whether retail investors served by newly-recruited advisors choose to move their respective assets to new accounts at the Company;
    • changes in the growth and profitability of the Company’s fee-based offerings and asset-based revenues;
    • the effect of current, pending and future legislation, regulation and regulatory actions, including disciplinary actions imposed by federal and state regulators and self-regulatory organizations;
    • the cost of defending, settling and remediating issues related to regulatory matters or legal proceedings, including civil monetary penalties or actual costs of reimbursing customers for losses in excess of our reserves or insurance;
    • changes made to the Company’s services and pricing, including in response to competitive developments and current, pending and future legislation, regulation and regulatory actions, and the effect that such changes may have on the Company’s gross profit streams and costs;
    • the execution of the Company’s capital management plans, including its compliance with the terms of the Company’s amended and restated credit agreement, the committed revolving credit facilities of the Company and LPL Financial, and the indentures governing the Company’s senior unsecured notes;
    • strategic acquisitions and investments, including pursuant to the Company’s Liquidity & Succession solution, and the effect that such acquisitions and investments may have on the Company’s capital management plans and liquidity;
    • the price, availability and trading volumes of shares of the Company’s common stock, which will affect the timing and size of future share repurchases by the Company, if any;
    • the execution of the Company’s plans and its success in realizing the synergies, expense savings, service improvements or efficiencies expected to result from its investments, initiatives and acquisitions, expense plans and technology initiatives;
    • whether advisors affiliated with Commonwealth and First Horizon will transition registration to the Company and whether assets reported as serviced by such financial advisors will translate into assets of the Company;
    • the performance of third-party service providers to which business processes have been transitioned;
    • the Company’s ability to control operating risks, information technology systems risks, cybersecurity risks and sourcing risks; and
    • the other factors set forth in the Company’s most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K, as may be amended or updated in the Company’s Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q or other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

    Except as required by law, the Company specifically disclaims any obligation to update any forward-looking statements as a result of developments occurring after the date of this earnings release, and you should not rely on statements contained herein as representing the Company’s view as of any date subsequent to the date of this press release.


    LPL Financial Holdings Inc.

    Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income
    (In thousands, except per share data)
    (Unaudited)
        Three Months Ended   Three Months Ended  
        June 30, March 31,   June 30,  
          2025     2025   Change   2024   Change
    REVENUE            
    Advisory   $ 1,717,738   $ 1,689,245   2% $ 1,288,163   33%
    Commission:            
    Sales-based     619,792     610,038   2%   423,070   46%
    Trailing     418,295     437,719   (4%)   363,976   15%
    Total commission     1,038,087     1,047,757   (1%)   787,046   32%
    Asset-based:            
    Client cash     397,332     392,031   1%   341,475   16%
    Other asset-based     305,015     303,210   1%   259,533   18%
    Total asset-based     702,347     695,241   1%   601,008   17%
    Service and fee     151,839     145,199   5%   135,000   12%
    Interest income, net     76,941     43,851   75%   47,478   62%
    Transaction     60,541     67,864   (11%)   58,935   3%
    Other     87,532     (19,150 ) n/m   14,139   n/m
        Total revenue     3,835,025     3,670,007   4%   2,931,769   31%
    EXPENSE            
    Advisory and commission     2,483,165     2,353,925   5%   1,819,027   37%
    Compensation and benefits     319,100     305,546   4%   274,000   16%
    Promotional     177,552     145,645   22%   136,125   30%
    Interest expense on borrowings     105,636     85,862   23%   64,341   64%
    Depreciation and amortization     96,231     92,356   4%   70,999   36%
    Occupancy and equipment     81,443     77,240   5%   69,529   17%
    Amortization of other intangibles     46,103     43,521   6%   30,607   51%
    Brokerage, clearing and exchange     43,290     44,138   (2%)   32,984   31%
    Professional services     41,092     36,326   13%   22,100   86%
    Communications and data processing     21,417     19,506   10%   19,406   10%
    Other     51,192     48,689   5%   62,580   (18%)
        Total expense     3,466,221     3,252,754   7%   2,601,698   33%
    INCOME BEFORE PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES     368,804     417,253   (12%)   330,071   12%
    PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES     95,555     98,680   (3%)   86,271   11%
    NET INCOME   $ 273,249   $ 318,573   (14%) $ 243,800   12%
    EARNINGS PER SHARE            
    Earnings per share, basic   $ 3.42   $ 4.27   (20%) $ 3.26   5%
    Earnings per share, diluted   $ 3.40   $ 4.24   (20%) $ 3.23   5%
    Weighted-average shares outstanding, basic     79,984     74,600   7%   74,725   7%
    Weighted-average shares outstanding, diluted     80,373     75,112   7%   75,548   6%
    LPL Financial Holdings Inc.
    Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income
    (In thousands, except per share data)
    (Unaudited)
        Six Months Ended  
        June 30,  
          2025     2024   Change
    REVENUE        
    Advisory   $ 3,406,983   $ 2,487,974   37%
    Commission:        
    Sales-based     1,229,830     808,305   52%
    Trailing     856,014     725,187   18%
    Total commission     2,085,844     1,533,492   36%
    Asset-based:        
    Client cash     789,363     693,857   14%
    Other asset-based     608,225     507,872   20%
    Total asset-based     1,397,588     1,201,729   16%
    Service and fee     297,038     267,172   11%
    Transaction     128,405     116,193   11%
    Interest income, net     120,792     91,003   33%
    Other     68,382     66,799   2%
        Total revenue     7,505,032     5,764,362   30%
    EXPENSE        
    Advisory and commission     4,837,090     3,552,514   36%
    Compensation and benefits     624,646     548,369   14%
    Promotional     323,197     262,744   23%
    Interest expense on borrowings     191,498     124,423   54%
    Depreciation and amortization     188,587     138,157   37%
    Occupancy and equipment     158,683     135,793   17%
    Amortization of other intangibles     89,624     60,159   49%
    Brokerage, clearing and exchange     87,428     63,516   38%
    Professional services     77,418     35,379   119%
    Communications and data processing     40,923     39,150   5%
    Other     99,881     99,895   —%
        Total expense     6,718,975     5,060,099   33%
    INCOME BEFORE PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES     786,057     704,263   12%
    PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES     194,235     171,699   13%
    NET INCOME   $ 591,822   $ 532,564   11%
    EARNINGS PER SHARE        
    Earnings per share, basic   $ 7.66   $ 7.13   7%
    Earnings per share, diluted   $ 7.61   $ 7.05   8%
    Weighted-average shares outstanding, basic     77,307     74,644   4%
    Weighted-average shares outstanding, diluted     77,760     75,529   3%
    LPL Financial Holdings Inc.
    Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition
    (In thousands, except share data)
    (Unaudited)
        June 30, 2025 March 31, 2025 December 31, 2024
    ASSETS
    Cash and equivalents   $ 4,185,337   $ 1,229,181   $ 967,079  
    Cash and equivalents segregated under federal or other regulations     1,611,200     1,513,037     1,597,249  
    Restricted cash     116,675     112,458     119,724  
    Receivables from clients, net     710,463     613,766     633,834  
    Receivables from brokers, dealers and clearing organizations     129,490     112,249     76,545  
    Advisor loans, net     2,536,190     2,468,033     2,281,088  
    Other receivables, net     951,063     939,411     902,777  
    Investment securities ($124,639, $122,729, and $42,267 at fair value at June 30, 2025, March 31, 2025, and December 31, 2024, respectively)     139,962     138,007     57,481  
    Property and equipment, net     1,278,991     1,237,693     1,210,027  
    Goodwill     2,213,393     2,213,100     2,172,873  
    Other intangibles, net     1,641,133     1,570,558     1,482,988  
    Other assets     1,959,779     1,815,729     1,815,739  
    Total assets   $ 17,473,676   $ 13,963,222   $ 13,317,404  
    LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
    LIABILITIES:        
    Client payables   $ 2,090,520   $ 2,045,285   $ 1,898,665  
    Payables to brokers, dealers and clearing organizations     273,593     252,035     129,228  
    Accrued advisory and commission expenses payable     303,614     303,837     323,996  
    Corporate debt and other borrowings, net     7,175,032     5,686,678     5,494,724  
    Accounts payable and accrued liabilities     556,086     479,803     588,450  
    Other liabilities     2,000,415     2,071,801     1,951,739  
    Total liabilities     12,399,260     10,839,439     10,386,802  
    STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY:        
    Common stock, $0.001 par value; 600,000,000 shares authorized; 136,603,206, 131,194,549, and 130,914,541 shares issued at June 30, 2025, March 31, 2025, and December 31, 2024, respectively     136     131     131  
    Additional paid-in capital     3,787,009     2,089,155     2,066,268  
    Treasury stock, at cost — 56,599,471, 56,611,181, and 56,253,909 shares at June 30, 2025, March 31, 2025, and December 31, 2024, respectively     (4,332,275 )   (4,331,582 )   (4,202,322 )
    Retained earnings     5,619,546     5,366,079     5,066,525  
    Total stockholders’ equity     5,074,416     3,123,783     2,930,602  
    Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity   $ 17,473,676   $ 13,963,222   $ 13,317,404  
    LPL Financial Holdings Inc.
    Management’s Statements of Operations
    (In thousands, except per share data)
    (Unaudited)
    Certain information in this release is presented as reviewed by the Company’s management and includes information derived from the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated statements of income, non-GAAP financial measures and operational and performance metrics. For information on non-GAAP financial measures, please see the section titled“Non-GAAP Financial Measures”in this release.

        Quarterly Results
        Q2 2025 Q1 2025 Change Q2 2024 Change
    Gross Profit(6)            
    Advisory   $ 1,717,738   $ 1,689,245   2% $ 1,288,163   33%
    Trailing commissions     418,295     437,719   (4%)   363,976   15%
    Sales-based commissions     619,792     610,038   2%   423,070   46%
    Advisory fees and commissions     2,755,825     2,737,002   1%   2,075,209   33%
    Production-based payout(7)     (2,406,692 )   (2,374,368 ) 1%   (1,812,050 ) 33%
    Advisory fees and commissions, net of payout     349,133     362,634   (4%)   263,159   33%
    Client cash(8)     413,516     408,224   1%   361,316   14%
    Other asset-based(9)     305,015     303,210   1%   259,533   18%
    Service and fee     151,839     145,199   5%   135,000   12%
    Transaction     60,541     67,864   (11%)   58,935   3%
    Interest income, net(10)     60,738     27,637   120%   27,618   120%
    Other revenue(11)     6,785     2,023   n/m   6,621   2%
    Total net advisory fees and commissions and attachment revenue     1,347,567     1,316,791   2%   1,112,182   21%
    Brokerage, clearing and exchange expense     (43,290 )   (44,138 ) (2%)   (32,984 ) 31%
    Gross Profit(6)     1,304,277     1,272,653   2%   1,079,198   21%
    G&A Expense            
    Core G&A(12)     425,595     413,069   3%   370,912   15%
    Regulatory charges     7,267     6,887   6%   7,594   (4%)
    Promotional (ongoing)(13)(14)     163,575     151,932   8%   147,830   11%
    Acquisition costs excluding interest(14)     71,562     43,407   65%   36,876   94%
    Employee share-based compensation     19,504     18,366   6%   19,968   (2%)
    Total G&A     687,503     633,661   8%   583,180   18%
    EBITDA(15)     616,774     638,992   (3%)   496,018   24%
    Depreciation and amortization     96,231     92,356   4%   70,999   36%
    Amortization of other intangibles     46,103     43,521   6%   30,607   51%
    Interest expense on borrowings(16)     102,323     80,725   27%   64,341   59%
    Acquisition costs – interest(14)     3,313     5,137   (36%)     100%
    INCOME BEFORE PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES     368,804     417,253   (12%)   330,071   12%
    PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES     95,555     98,680   (3%)   86,271   11%
    NET INCOME   $ 273,249   $ 318,573   (14%) $ 243,800   12%
    Earnings per share, diluted   $ 3.40   $ 4.24   (20%) $ 3.23   5%
    Weighted-average shares outstanding, diluted     80,373     75,112   7%   75,548   6%
    Adjusted EBITDA(15)   $ 688,336   $ 682,399   1% $ 532,894   29%
    Adjusted pre-tax income(17)   $ 489,782   $ 509,318   (4%) $ 397,554   23%
    Adjusted EPS(18)   $ 4.51   $ 5.15   (12%) $ 3.88   16%
    LPL Financial Holdings Inc.
    Operating Metrics
    (Dollars in billions, except where noted)
    (Unaudited)
        Q2 2025 Q1 2025 Change Q2 2024 Change
    Market Drivers            
    S&P 500 Index (end of period)     6,205     5,612   11%   5,460   14%
    Russell 2000 Index (end of period)     2,175     2,012   8%   2,048   6%
    Fed Funds daily effective rate (average bps)     433     433   —bps   533   (100bps)
                 
    Advisory and Brokerage Assets(19)            
    Advisory assets   $ 1,060.7   $ 977.4   9% $ 829.1   28%
    Brokerage assets     858.5     817.5   5%   668.7   28%
    Total Advisory and Brokerage Assets   $ 1,919.2   $ 1,794.9   7% $ 1,497.8   28%
    Advisory as a % of Total Advisory and Brokerage Assets     55.3 %   54.5 % 80bps   55.4 % (10bps)
                 
    Assets by Platform            
    Corporate advisory assets(20)   $ 766.4   $ 699.1   10% $ 567.8   35%
    Independent RIA advisory assets(20)     294.3     278.3   6%   261.3   13%
    Brokerage assets     858.5     817.5   5%   668.7   28%
    Total Advisory and Brokerage Assets   $ 1,919.2   $ 1,794.9   7% $ 1,497.8   28%
                 
    Centrally Managed Assets            
    Centrally managed assets(21)   $ 183.5   $ 164.4   12% $ 126.9   45%
    Centrally Managed as a % of Total Advisory Assets     17.3 %   16.8 % 50bps   15.3 % 200bps
    LPL Financial Holdings Inc.
    Operating Metrics
    (Dollars in billions, except where noted)
    (Unaudited)
        Q2 2025 Q1 2025 Change Q2 2024 Change
    Organic Net New Assets (NNA)(22)            
    Organic net new advisory assets   $ 23.1   $ 35.7   n/m $ 26.6   n/m
    Organic net new brokerage assets     (2.6 )   35.2   n/m   2.5   n/m
    Total Organic Net New Assets   $ 20.5   $ 70.9   n/m $ 29.0   n/m
                 
    Acquired Net New Assets(22)            
    Acquired net new advisory assets   $   $ 1.9   n/m $ 0.3   n/m
    Acquired net new brokerage assets         6.0   n/m   4.8   n/m
    Total Acquired Net New Assets   $   $ 7.9   n/m $ 5.0   n/m
                 
    Total Net New Assets(22)            
    Net new advisory assets   $ 23.1   $ 37.6   n/m $ 26.8   n/m
    Net new brokerage assets     (2.6 )   41.2   n/m   7.2   n/m
    Total Net New Assets   $ 20.5   $ 78.8   n/m $ 34.0   n/m
                 
    Net brokerage to advisory conversions(23)   $ 6.4   $ 5.9   n/m $ 3.7   n/m
    Organic advisory NNA annualized growth(24)     9.5 %   14.9 % n/m   13.4 % n/m
    Total organic NNA annualized growth(24)     4.6 %   16.3 % n/m   8.1 % n/m
                 
    Net New Advisory Assets(22)            
    Corporate RIA net new advisory assets   $ 24.8   $ 31.7   n/m $ 23.4   n/m
    Independent RIA net new advisory assets     (1.7 )   5.9   n/m   3.4   n/m
    Total Net New Advisory Assets   $ 23.1   $ 37.6   n/m $ 26.8   n/m
    Centrally managed net new advisory assets(22)   $ 6.1   $ 6.5   n/m $ 4.4   n/m
                 
    Net buy (sell) activity(25)   $ 36.6   $ 42.0   n/m $ 39.3   n/m
    Note: Totals may not foot due to rounding.
    LPL Financial Holdings Inc.
    Client Cash Data
    (Dollars in thousands, except where noted)
    (Unaudited)
        Q2 2025 Q1 2025 Change Q2 2024 Change
    Client Cash Balances (in billions)(26)            
    Insured cash account sweep   $ 34.2   $ 36.1   (5%) $ 31.0   10%
    Deposit cash account sweep     10.8     10.7   1%   9.2   17%
    Total Bank Sweep     44.9     46.8   (4%)   40.2   12%
    Money market sweep     3.7     4.3   (14%)   2.3   61%
    Total Client Cash Sweep Held by Third Parties     48.6     51.1   (5%)   42.5   14%
    Client cash account (CCA)     2.0     1.9   5%   1.5   33%
    Total Client Cash Balances   $ 50.6   $ 53.1   (5%) $ 44.0   15%
    Client Cash Balances as a % of Total Assets     2.6 %   3.0 % (40bps)   2.9 % (30bps)
    Note: Totals may not foot due to rounding.
      Three Months Ended
      June 30, 2025 March 31, 2025 June 30, 2024
    Interest-Earnings Assets Average Balance (in billions) Revenue Net Yield (bps)(27) Average Balance (in billions) Revenue Net Yield (bps)(27) Average Balance (in billions) Revenue Net Yield (bps)(27)
    Insured cash account sweep $ 34.4 $ 293,420 342 $ 36.0 $ 299,618 337 $ 31.7 $ 250,804 318
    Deposit cash account sweep   10.7   101,298 381   10.2   89,728 356   9.0   89,070 399
    Total Bank Sweep   45.1   394,718 351   46.2   389,346 341   40.7   339,874 336
    Money market sweep   4.0   2,614 26   4.1   2,685 26   2.3   1,601 28
    Total Client Cash Held ByThird Parties   49.1   397,332 325   50.4   392,031 316   43.0   341,475 320
    Client cash account (CCA)   1.7   16,184 378   1.8   16,193 368   1.7   19,841 472
    Total Client Cash   50.8   413,516 326   52.2   408,224 317   44.7   361,316 326
    Margin receivables   0.6   12,080 807   0.6   11,444 789   0.5   10,521 889
    Other interest revenue   4.4   48,658 448   1.3   16,193 512   1.3   17,097 545
    Total Client Cash andInterest Income, Net $ 55.8 $ 474,254 341 $ 54.0 $ 435,861 327 $ 46.5 $ 388,934 337
    Note: Totals may not foot due to rounding.
    LPL Financial Holdings Inc.
    Monthly Metrics
    (Dollars in billions, except where noted)
    (Unaudited)
        June 2025 May 2025 Change April 2025 March 2025
    Advisory and Brokerage Assets(19)            
    Advisory assets   $ 1,060.7   $ 1,021.6   4% $ 978.6   $ 977.4  
    Brokerage assets     858.5     832.9   3%   809.4     817.5  
    Total Advisory and Brokerage Assets   $ 1,919.2   $ 1,854.5   3% $ 1,787.9   $ 1,794.9  
                 
    Organic Net New Assets (NNA)(22)            
    Organic net new advisory assets   $ 7.9   $ 8.3   n/m $ 6.9   $ 12.7  
    Organic net new brokerage assets     0.1     (1.8 ) n/m   (0.8 )   0.5  
    Total Organic Net New Assets   $ 8.0   $ 6.5   n/m $ 6.1   $ 13.1  
                 
    Acquired Net New Assets(22)            
    Acquired net new advisory assets   $   $   n/m $   $ 1.8  
    Acquired net new brokerage assets           n/m       5.3  
    Total Acquired Net New Assets   $   $   n/m $   $ 7.1  
                 
    Total Net New Assets(22)            
    Net new advisory assets   $ 7.9   $ 8.3   n/m $ 6.9   $ 14.5  
    Net new brokerage assets     0.1     (1.8 ) n/m   (0.8 )   5.8  
    Total Net New Assets   $ 8.0   $ 6.5   n/m $ 6.1   $ 20.2  
    Net brokerage to advisory conversions(23)   $ 2.4   $ 2.2   n/m $ 1.7   $ 1.9  
                 
    Client Cash Balances(26)            
    Insured cash account sweep   $ 34.2   $ 33.4   2% $ 35.2   $ 36.1  
    Deposit cash account sweep     10.8     10.6   2%   10.7     10.7  
    Total Bank Sweep     44.9     44.0   2%   45.9     46.8  
    Money market sweep     3.7     3.9   (5%)   4.2     4.3  
    Total Client Cash Sweep Held by Third Parties     48.6     47.9   1%   50.2     51.1  
    Client cash account (CCA)     2.0     1.3   54%   1.6     1.9  
    Total Client Cash Balances   $ 50.6   $ 49.2   3% $ 51.8   $ 53.1  
                 
    Net buy (sell) activity(25)   $ 12.7   $ 13.5   n/m $ 10.4   $ 13.2  
                 
    Market Drivers            
    S&P 500 Index (end of period)     6,205     5,912   5%   5,569     5,612  
    Russell 2000 Index (end of period)     2,175     2,066   5%   1,964     2,012  
    Fed Funds effective rate (average bps)     433     433   —bps   433     433  
    Note: Totals may not foot due to rounding.
    LPL Financial Holdings Inc.
    Financial Measures
    (Dollars in thousands, except where noted)
    (Unaudited)
        Q2 2025 Q1 2025 Change Q2 2024 Change
    Commission Revenue by Product            
    Annuities   $ 629,763   $ 615,594   2% $ 469,100   34%
    Mutual funds     223,317     233,895   (5%)   187,432   19%
    Fixed income     53,014     61,553   (14%)   53,192   —%
    Equities     47,811     49,074   (3%)   34,434   39%
    Other     84,182     87,641   (4%)   42,888   96%
    Total commission revenue   $ 1,038,087   $ 1,047,757   (1%) $ 787,046   32%
                 
    Commission Revenue by Sales-based and Trailing                    
    Sales-based commissions            
    Annuities   $ 393,654   $ 365,767   8% $ 260,188   51%
    Mutual funds     52,301     55,607   (6%)   42,981   22%
    Fixed income     53,014     61,553   (14%)   53,192   —%
    Equities     47,811     49,074   (3%)   34,434   39%
    Other     73,012     78,037   (6%)   32,275   126%
    Total sales-based commissions   $ 619,792   $ 610,038   2% $ 423,070   46%
    Trailing commissions            
    Annuities   $ 236,109   $ 249,827   (5%) $ 208,912   13%
    Mutual funds     171,016     178,288   (4%)   144,451   18%
    Other     11,170     9,604   16%   10,613   5%
    Total trailing commissions   $ 418,295   $ 437,719   (4%) $ 363,976   15%
    Total commission revenue   $ 1,038,087   $ 1,047,757   (1%) $ 787,046   32%
                 
    Payout Rate(7)     87.33 %   86.75 % 58bps   87.32 % 1bps
    LPL Financial Holdings Inc.
    Capital Management Measures
    (Dollars in thousands, except where noted)
    (Unaudited)
        Q2 2025 Q1 2025 Q4 2024
    Cash and equivalents   $ 4,185,337   $ 1,229,181   $ 967,079  
    Cash at regulated subsidiaries     (1,288,722 )   (1,085,459 )   (884,779 )
    Excess cash at regulated subsidiaries per the Credit Agreement     720,359     476,908     397,138  
    Corporate Cash(2)   $ 3,616,974   $ 620,630   $ 479,438  
             
    Corporate Cash(2)        
    Cash at LPL Holdings, Inc.   $ 2,841,718   $ 104,080   $ 39,782  
    Excess cash at regulated subsidiaries per the Credit Agreement     720,359     476,908     397,138  
    Cash at non-regulated subsidiaries     54,897     39,642     42,518  
    Corporate Cash   $ 3,616,974   $ 620,630   $ 479,438  
             
    Leverage Ratio        
    Total debt   $ 7,220,000   $ 5,720,000   $ 5,517,000  
    Total corporate cash     3,616,974     620,630     479,438  
    Credit Agreement Net Debt   $ 3,603,026   $ 5,099,370   $ 5,037,562  
    Credit Agreement EBITDA (trailing twelve months)(28)   $ 2,922,433   $ 2,797,285   $ 2,665,033  
    Leverage Ratio     1.23 x   1.82 x   1.89 x
        June 30, 2025  
    Total Debt   Balance Current Applicable Margin Interest Rate Maturity
    Revolving Credit Facility(a)   $   ABR+37.5 bps / SOFR+147.5 bps 5.797 % 5/20/2029
    Broker-Dealer Revolving Credit Facility       SOFR+125 bps 5.700 % 5/18/2026
    Senior Unsecured Term Loan A     1,020,000   SOFR+147.5 bps(b) 5.791 % 12/5/2026
    Senior Unsecured Notes     500,000   5.700% Fixed 5.700 % 5/20/2027
    Senior Unsecured Notes     400,000   4.625% Fixed 4.625 % 11/15/2027
    Senior Unsecured Notes     500,000   4.900% Fixed 4.900 % 4/3/2028
    Senior Unsecured Notes     750,000   6.750% Fixed 6.750 % 11/17/2028
    Senior Unsecured Notes     900,000   4.000% Fixed 4.000 % 3/15/2029
    Senior Unsecured Notes     750,000   5.200% Fixed 5.200 % 3/15/2030
    Senior Unsecured Notes     500,000   5.150% Fixed 5.150 % 6/15/2030
    Senior Unsecured Notes     400,000   4.375% Fixed 4.375 % 5/15/2031
    Senior Unsecured Notes     500,000   6.000% Fixed 6.000 % 5/20/2034
    Senior Unsecured Notes     500,000   5.650% Fixed 5.650 % 3/15/2035
    Senior Unsecured Notes     500,000   5.750% Fixed 5.750 % 6/15/2035
    Total / Weighted Average   $ 7,220,000     5.352 %  
    (a) Unsecured borrowing capacity of $2.25 billion at LPL Holdings, Inc.
    (b) The SOFR rate option is a one-month SOFR rate and subject to an interest rate floor of 0 bps.
    LPL Financial Holdings Inc.
    Key Business and Financial Metrics
    (Dollars in thousands, except where noted)
    (Unaudited)
        Q2 2025 Q1 2025 Change Q2 2024 Change
    Business Metrics            
    Advisors     29,353     29,493   —%   23,462   25%
    Net new advisors     (140 )   605   (123%)   578   (124%)
    Annualized advisory fees and commissions per advisor(29)   $ 375   $ 375   —% $ 358   5%
    Average total assets per advisor ($ in millions)(30)   $ 65.4   $ 60.9   7% $ 63.8   3%
    Transition assistance loan amortization ($ in millions)(31)   $ 89.4   $ 81.8   9% $ 61.9   44%
    Total client accounts (in millions)     10.5     10.4   1%   8.6   22%
    Recruited AUM ($ in billions)     18.4     38.6   (52%)   24.3   (24%)
                 
    Employees(32)     9,389     9,097   3%   8,625   9%
                 
    AUM retention rate (quarterly annualized)(33)     97.6 %   98.2 % (60bps)   98.4 % (80bps)
                 
    Capital Management            
    Capital expenditures ($ in millions)(34)   $ 137.0   $ 119.5   15% $ 128.9   6%
     Acquisitions, net ($ in millions)(35)   $ 102.8   $ 95.1   8% $ 115.1   n/m
                 
    Share repurchases ($ in millions)   $   $ 100.0   (100%) $   —%
    Dividends ($ in millions)     24.0     22.4   7%   22.4   7%
    Total Capital Returned ($ in millions)   $ 24.0   $ 122.4   (80%) $ 22.4   7%


    Non-GAAP Financial Measures

    Management believes that presenting certain non-GAAP financial measures by excluding or including certain items can be helpful to investors and analysts who may wish to use this information to analyze the Company’s current performance, prospects and valuation. Management uses this non-GAAP information internally to evaluate operating performance and in formulating the budget for future periods. Management believes that the non-GAAP financial measures and metrics discussed below are appropriate for evaluating the performance of the Company.

    Adjusted EPS and Adjusted net income

    Adjusted EPS is defined as adjusted net income, a non-GAAP measure defined as net income plus the after-tax impact of amortization of other intangibles and acquisition costs, divided by the weighted average number of diluted shares outstanding for the applicable period. The Company presents adjusted net income and adjusted EPS because management believes that these metrics can provide investors with useful insight into the Company’s core operating performance by excluding non-cash items, acquisition costs, and certain other charges that management does not believe impact the Company’s ongoing operations. Adjusted net income and adjusted EPS are not measures of the Company’s financial performance under GAAP and should not be considered as alternatives to net income, earnings per diluted share or any other performance measure derived in accordance with GAAP. For a reconciliation of net income and earnings per diluted share to adjusted net income and adjusted EPS, please see the endnote disclosures in this release.

    Gross profit

    Gross profit is calculated as total revenue less advisory and commission expense; brokerage, clearing and exchange expense; and market fluctuations on employee deferred compensation. All other expense categories, including depreciation and amortization of property and equipment and amortization of other intangibles, are considered general and administrative in nature. Because the Company’s gross profit amounts do not include any depreciation and amortization expense, the Company considers gross profit to be a non-GAAP financial measure that may not be comparable to similar measures used by others in its industry. Management believes that gross profit can provide investors with useful insight into the Company’s core operating performance before indirect costs that are general and administrative in nature. For a calculation of gross profit, please see the endnote disclosures in this release.

    Core G&A

    Core G&A consists of total expense less the following expenses: advisory and commission; depreciation and amortization; interest expense on borrowings; brokerage, clearing and exchange; amortization of other intangibles; market fluctuations on employee deferred compensation; promotional (ongoing); employee share-based compensation; regulatory charges; and acquisition costs. Management presents core G&A because it believes core G&A reflects the corporate expense categories over which management can generally exercise a measure of control, compared with expense items over which management either cannot exercise control, such as advisory and commission, or which management views as promotional expense necessary to support advisor growth and retention, including conferences and transition assistance. Core G&A is not a measure of the Company’s total expense as calculated in accordance with GAAP. For a reconciliation of the Company’s total expense to core G&A, please see the endnote disclosures in this release. The Company does not provide an outlook for its total expense because it contains expense components, such as advisory and commission, that are market-driven and over which the Company cannot exercise control. Accordingly, a reconciliation of the Company’s outlook for total expense to an outlook for core G&A cannot be made available without unreasonable effort.

    EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA

    EBITDA is defined as net income plus interest expense on borrowings, provision for income taxes, depreciation and amortization, and amortization of other intangibles. Adjusted EBITDA is defined as EBITDA, a non-GAAP measure, plus acquisition costs. The Company presents EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA because management believes that they can be useful financial metrics in understanding the Company’s earnings from operations. EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA are not measures of the Company’s financial performance under GAAP and should not be considered as alternatives to net income or any other performance measure derived in accordance with GAAP. For a reconciliation of net income to EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA, please see the endnote disclosures in this release.

    Adjusted pre-tax income

    Adjusted pre-tax income is defined as income before provision for income taxes plus amortization of other intangibles and acquisition costs. The Company presents adjusted pre-tax income because management believes that it can provide investors with useful insight into the Company’s core operating performance by excluding non-cash items, acquisition costs, and certain other charges that management does not believe impact the Company’s ongoing operations. Adjusted pre-tax income is not a measure of the Company’s financial performance under GAAP and should not be considered as an alternative to income before provision for income taxes or any other performance measure derived in accordance with GAAP. For a reconciliation of income before provision for income taxes to adjusted pre-tax income, please see the endnote disclosures in this release.

    Credit Agreement EBITDA

    Credit Agreement EBITDA is defined in, and calculated by management in accordance with, the Company’s amended and restated credit agreement (“Credit Agreement”) as “Consolidated EBITDA,” which is Consolidated Net Income (as defined in the Credit Agreement) plus interest expense on borrowings, provision for income taxes, depreciation and amortization, and amortization of other intangibles, and is further adjusted to exclude certain non-cash charges and other adjustments, and to include future expected cost savings, operating expense reductions or other synergies from certain transactions. The Company presents Credit Agreement EBITDA because management believes that it can be a useful financial metric in understanding the Company’s debt capacity and covenant compliance under its Credit Agreement. Credit Agreement EBITDA is not a measure of the Company’s financial performance under GAAP and should not be considered as an alternative to net income or any other performance measure derived in accordance with GAAP. For a reconciliation of net income to Credit Agreement EBITDA, please see the endnote disclosures in this release.

    Endnote Disclosures

    (1) Represents the estimated total advisory and brokerage assets expected to transition to the Company’s primary broker-dealer subsidiary, LPL Financial, in connection with advisors who transferred their licenses to LPL Financial during the period. The estimate is based on prior business reported by the advisors, which has not been independently and fully verified by LPL Financial. The actual transition of assets to LPL Financial generally occurs over several quarters and the actual amount transitioned may vary from the estimate.

    (2) Corporate cash, a component of cash and equivalents, is the sum of cash and equivalents from the following: (1) cash and equivalents held at LPL Holdings, Inc., (2) cash and equivalents held at regulated subsidiaries as defined by the Company’s Credit Agreement, which include LPL Financial, LPL Enterprise, LLC, The Private Trust Company, N.A. and certain of Atria’s introducing broker-dealer subsidiaries, in excess of the capital requirements of the Company’s Credit Agreement and (3) cash and equivalents held at non-regulated subsidiaries.

    (3) Compliance with the Leverage Ratio is only required under the Company’s revolving credit facility.

    (4) Based on unaudited information of Commonwealth for the quarter ended June 30, 2025.

    (5) The Company was named a Top RIA custodian (Cerulli Associates, 2024 U.S. RIA Marketplace Report); No. 1 Independent Broker-Dealer in the U.S. (based on total revenues, Financial Planning magazine 1996-2022); and, among third-party providers of brokerage services to banks and credit unions, No. 1 in AUM Growth from Financial Institutions; No. 1 in Market Share of AUM from Financial Institutions; No. 1 in Market Share of Revenue from Financial Institutions; No. 1 on Financial Institution Market Share; No. 1 on Share of Advisors (2021-2022 Kehrer Bielan Research and Consulting Annual TPM Report). Fortune 500 as of June 2021.

    (6) Gross profit is a non-GAAP financial measure. Please see a description of gross profit under the “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” section of this release for additional information. Below is a calculation of gross profit for the periods presented (in thousands):

        Q2 2025 Q1 2025 Q2 2024
    Total revenue   $ 3,835,025   $ 3,670,007   $ 2,931,769  
    Advisory and commission expense     2,483,165     2,353,925     1,819,027  
    Brokerage, clearing and exchange expense     43,290     44,138     32,984  
    Employee deferred compensation     4,293     (709 )   560  
    Gross profit   $ 1,304,277   $ 1,272,653   $ 1,079,198  

    (7) Production-based payout is a financial measure calculated as advisory and commission expense plus (less) advisor deferred compensation. The payout rate is calculated by dividing the production-based payout by total advisory and commission revenue. Below is a reconciliation of the Company’s advisory and commission expense to the production-based payout and a calculation of the payout rate for the periods presented (in thousands, except payout rate):

        Q2 2025 Q1 2025 Q2 2024
    Advisory and commission expense   $ 2,483,165   $ 2,353,925   $ 1,819,027  
    Plus (Less): Advisor deferred compensation     (76,473 )   20,443     (6,977 )
    Production-based payout   $ 2,406,692   $ 2,374,368   $ 1,812,050  
             
    Advisory and commission revenue   $ 2,755,825   $ 2,737,002   $ 2,075,209  
             
    Payout rate     87.33 %   86.75 %   87.32 %

    (8) Below is a reconciliation of client cash revenue per Management’s Statements of Operations to client cash revenue, a component of asset-based revenue, on the Company’s condensed consolidated statements of income for the periods presented (in thousands):

             
        Q2 2025 Q1 2025 Q2 2024
    Client cash on Management’s Statement of Operations   $ 413,516   $ 408,224   $ 361,316  
    Interest income on CCA balances segregated under federal or other regulations(10)     (16,184 )   (16,193 )   (19,841 )
    Client cash on Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income   $ 397,332   $ 392,031   $ 341,475  

    (9) Consists of revenue from the Company’s sponsorship programs with financial product manufacturers, omnibus processing and networking services but does not include fees from client cash programs.

    (10) Below is a reconciliation of interest income, net per Management’s Statements of Operations to interest income, net on the Company’s condensed consolidated statements of income for the periods presented (in thousands):

        Q2 2025 Q1 2025 Q2 2024
    Interest income, net on Management’s Statement of Operations   $ 60,738   $ 27,637     27,618  
    Interest income on CCA balances segregated under federal or other regulations(8)     16,184     16,193     19,841  
    Interest income on deferred compensation     19     21     19  
    Interest income, net on Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income   $ 76,941   $ 43,851   $ 47,478  

    (11) Below is a reconciliation of other revenue per Management’s Statements of Operations to other revenue on the Company’s condensed consolidated statements of income for the periods presented (in thousands):

        Q2 2025 Q1 2025 Q2 2024
    Other revenue on Management’s Statement of Operations   $ 6,785   $ 2,023   $ 6,621  
    Interest income on deferred compensation     (19 )   (21 )   (19 )
    Deferred compensation     80,766     (21,152 )   7,537  
    Other revenue on Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income   $ 87,532   $ (19,150 ) $ 14,139  

    (12) Core G&A is a non-GAAP financial measure. Please see a description of core G&A under the “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” section of this release for additional information. Below is a reconciliation of the Company’s total expense to core G&A for the periods presented (in thousands):

        Q2 2025 Q1 2025 Q2 2024
    Core G&A Reconciliation        
    Total expense   $ 3,466,221   $ 3,252,754   $ 2,601,698  
    Advisory and commission     (2,483,165 )   (2,353,925 )   (1,819,027 )
    Depreciation and amortization     (96,231 )   (92,356 )   (70,999 )
    Interest expense on borrowings(16)     (105,636 )   (85,862 )   (64,341 )
    Brokerage, clearing and exchange     (43,290 )   (44,138 )   (32,984 )
    Amortization of other intangibles     (46,103 )   (43,521 )   (30,607 )
    Employee deferred compensation     (4,293 )   709     (560 )
    Total G&A     687,503     633,661     583,180  
    Promotional (ongoing)(13)(14)     (163,575 )   (151,932 )   (147,830 )
    Acquisition costs excluding interest(14)     (71,562 )   (43,407 )   (36,876 )
    Employee share-based compensation     (19,504 )   (18,366 )   (19,968 )
    Regulatory charges     (7,267 )   (6,887 )   (7,594 )
    Core G&A   $ 425,595   $ 413,069   $ 370,912  

    (13) Promotional (ongoing) includes $21.2 million, $14.8 million and $12.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2025, March 31, 2025 and June 30, 2024, respectively, of support costs related to full-time employees that are classified within Compensation and benefits expense in the condensed consolidated statements of income and excludes costs that have been incurred as part of acquisitions that have been classified within acquisition costs.

    (14) Acquisition costs include the costs to setup, onboard and integrate acquired entities and other costs that were incurred as a result of the acquisitions. The below table summarizes the primary components of acquisition costs for the periods presented (in thousands):

        Q2 2025 Q1 2025 Q2 2024
    Acquisition costs        
    Change in fair value of contingent consideration(36)   $ 309   $ 6,594   $ 24,624  
    Compensation and benefits     16,054     17,417     6,827  
    Professional services     11,057     6,145     3,567  
    Promotional(13)     35,198     8,538     539  
    Interest(16)     3,313     5,137      
    Other     8,944     4,713     1,319  
    Acquisition costs   $ 74,875   $ 48,544   $ 36,876  

    (15) EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA are non-GAAP financial measures. Please see a description of EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA under the “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” section of this release for additional information. Below is a reconciliation of net income to EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA for the periods presented (in thousands):

        Q2 2025 Q1 2025 Q2 2024
    EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA Reconciliation        
    Net income   $ 273,249   $ 318,573   $ 243,800  
    Interest expense on borrowings(16)     105,636     85,862     64,341  
    Provision for income taxes     95,555     98,680     86,271  
    Depreciation and amortization     96,231     92,356     70,999  
    Amortization of other intangibles     46,103     43,521     30,607  
    EBITDA   $ 616,774   $ 638,992   $ 496,018  
    Acquisition costs excluding interest(14)     71,562     43,407     36,876  
    Adjusted EBITDA   $ 688,336   $ 682,399   $ 532,894  

    (16) Below is a reconciliation of interest expense on borrowings per Management’s Statements of Operations to interest expense on borrowings on the Company’s condensed consolidated statements of income for the periods presented (in thousands):

        Q2 2025 Q1 2025 Q2 2024
    Interest expense on borrowings on Management’s Statement of Operations   $ 102,323   $ 80,725   $ 64,341  
    Cost of debt issuance related to Commonwealth acquisition(14)     3,313     5,137      
    Interest expense on borrowings on Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income   $ 105,636   $ 85,862   $ 64,341  

    (17) Adjusted pre-tax income is a non-GAAP financial measure. Please see a description of adjusted pre-tax income under the “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” section of this release for additional information. Below is a reconciliation of income before provision for income taxes to adjusted pre-tax income for the periods presented (in thousands):

        Q2 2025 Q1 2025 Q2 2024
    Income before provision for income taxes   $ 368,804   $ 417,253   $ 330,071  
    Amortization of other intangibles     46,103     43,521     30,607  
    Acquisition costs(14)     74,875     48,544     36,876  
    Adjusted pre-tax income   $ 489,782   $ 509,318   $ 397,554  

    (18) Adjusted net income and adjusted EPS are non-GAAP financial measures. Please see a description of adjusted net income and adjusted EPS under the “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” section of this release for additional information. Below is a reconciliation of net income and earnings per diluted share to adjusted net income and adjusted EPS for the periods presented (in thousands, except per share data):

        Q2 2025 Q1 2025 Q2 2024
        Amount Per Share Amount Per Share Amount Per Share
    Net income / earnings per diluted share   $ 273,249   $ 3.40   $ 318,573   $ 4.24   $ 243,800   $ 3.23  
    Amortization of other intangibles     46,103     0.57     43,521     0.58     30,607     0.41  
    Acquisition costs(14)     74,875     0.93     48,544     0.65     36,876     0.49  
    Tax benefit     (31,433 )   (0.39 )   (23,937 )   (0.32 )   (17,816 )   (0.24 )
    Adjusted net income / adjusted EPS   $ 362,794   $ 4.51   $ 386,701   $ 5.15   $ 293,467   $ 3.88  
    Diluted share count     80,373       75,112       75,548    
    Note: Totals may not foot due to rounding.

    (19) Consists of total advisory and brokerage assets under custody at the Company’s primary broker-dealer subsidiary, LPL Financial, as well as assets under custody of a third-party custodian related to Atria’s seven introducing broker-dealer subsidiaries.

    (20) Assets on the Company’s corporate advisory platform are serviced by investment advisor representatives of LPL Financial. Assets on the Company’s independent RIA advisory platform are serviced by investment advisor representatives of separate registered investment advisor firms rather than representatives of LPL Financial.

    (21) Consists of advisory assets in LPL Financial’s Model Wealth Portfolios, Optimum Market Portfolios, Personal Wealth Portfolios and Guided Wealth Portfolios platforms.

    (22) Consists of total client deposits into advisory or brokerage accounts less total client withdrawals from advisory or brokerage accounts, plus dividends, plus interest, minus advisory fees. The Company considers conversions from and to brokerage or advisory accounts as deposits and withdrawals, respectively.

    (23) Consists of existing custodied assets that converted from brokerage to advisory, less existing custodied assets that converted from advisory to brokerage.

    (24) Calculated as annualized current period organic net new assets divided by preceding period assets in their respective categories of advisory assets or total advisory and brokerage assets.

    (25) Represents the amount of securities purchased less the amount of securities sold in client accounts custodied with LPL Financial.

    (26) Client cash balances include CCA and exclude purchased money market funds. CCA balances include cash that clients have deposited with LPL Financial that is included in Client payables in the condensed consolidated balance sheets. The following table presents purchased money market funds for the periods presented (in billions):

        Q2 2025 Q1 2025 Q2 2024
    Purchased money market funds   $ 47.0   $ 44.7   $ 35.7  

    (27) Calculated by dividing revenue for the period by the average balance during the period.

    (28) EBITDA and Credit Agreement EBITDA are non-GAAP financial measures. Please see a description of EBITDA and Credit Agreement EBITDA under the “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” section of this release for additional information. Under the Credit Agreement, management calculates Credit Agreement EBITDA for a trailing twelve month period at the end of each fiscal quarter and in doing so may make further adjustments to prior quarters. Below are reconciliations of trailing twelve month net income to trailing twelve month EBITDA and Credit Agreement EBITDA for the periods presented (in thousands):

        Q2 2025 Q1 2025 Q4 2024
    EBITDA and Credit Agreement EBITDA Reconciliations        
    Net income   $ 1,117,874   $ 1,088,425   $ 1,058,616  
    Interest expense on borrowings     341,256     299,961     274,181  
    Provision for income taxes     356,812     347,528     334,276  
    Depreciation and amortization     358,957     333,725     308,527  
    Amortization of other intangibles     164,699     149,203     135,234  
    EBITDA   $ 2,339,598   $ 2,218,842   $ 2,110,834  
    Credit Agreement Adjustments:        
    Acquisition costs and other(14)(37)   $ 269,638   $ 249,870   $ 223,614  
    Employee share-based compensation     84,226     84,690     88,957  
    M&A accretion(38)     222,150     237,160     235,048  
    Advisor share-based compensation     2,838     2,740     2,597  
    Loss on extinguishment of debt     3,983     3,983     3,983  
    Credit Agreement EBITDA   $ 2,922,433   $ 2,797,285   $ 2,665,033  

    (29) Calculated based on the average advisor count from the current period and prior periods.

    (30) Calculated based on the end of period total advisory and brokerage assets divided by end of period advisor count.

    (31) Represents amortization expense on forgivable loans for transition assistance to advisors and institutions.

    (32) During the first quarter of 2025, the Company updated its reporting of employees to include all full-time employees, including those reflected in Core G&A, promotional (ongoing) and advisory and commission expense. Prior period disclosures have been updated to reflect this change as applicable.

    (33) Reflects retention of total advisory and brokerage assets, calculated by deducting quarterly annualized attrition from total advisory and brokerage assets, divided by the prior quarter total advisory and brokerage assets.

    (34) Capital expenditures represent cash payments for property and equipment during the period.

    (35) Acquisitions, net represent cash paid for acquisitions, net of cash acquired during the period. Acquisitions, net for the three months ended March 31, 2025 excludes $70.2 million related to The Investment Center, Inc., which was prefunded on October 1, 2024 in conjunction with the close of the Atria acquisition, as well as cash inflows associated with working capital and other post-closing adjustments.

    (36) Represents a fair value adjustment to our contingent consideration liabilities that is reflected in other expense in the condensed consolidated statements of income.

    (37) Acquisition costs and other primarily include acquisition costs related to Atria, costs incurred related to the integration of the strategic relationship with Prudential Advisors, a $26.4 million reduction related to the departure of the Company’s former Chief Executive Officer and related clawback of share-based compensation awards, and an $18.0 million regulatory charge recognized during the three months ended September 30, 2024 reflecting the amount of a penalty proposed by the SEC as part of its civil investigation of the Company’s compliance with certain elements of the Company’s AML compliance program.

    (38) M&A accretion is an adjustment to reflect the annualized expected run rate EBITDA of an acquisition as permitted by the Credit Agreement for up to eight fiscal quarters following the close of such acquisition.

    The MIL Network