Category: Transport

  • MIL-OSI USA: Golden slams GOP budget priorities as fiscally irresponsible plan to juice elites at expense of working families

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Jared Golden (ME-02)

    Senate plan features exploding deficits, health care cuts, giveaways to the wealthy

    WASHINGTON — Congressman Jared Golden (ME-02) released the following statement regarding the House and Senate GOP’s budget plans, following a vote Thursday to advance a harmful budget resolution through the Senate: 

    “Americans should be furious that the Senate GOP has picked up where their House counterparts left off, pushing a budget designed to slash taxes for the wealthy and corporations, paid for by cutting Americans’ health care and blowing up the deficit. Rather than pushing back against the many flaws in the House GOP budget resolution, Senate leaders are seeking simply to hide the cost of this plan from the American people with new budgeting gimmicks that, if successful, will set a dangerous precedent for future Congresses to ratchet up spending again and again without ever paying for it.

    “We can do so much better than this naked attempt to further tilt the system against the many in favor of the few at the top. If we ask the wealthy and big corporations to pay their fair share, we could cut taxes for the middle class and reduce the deficit without harmful cuts to health care. The GOP’s majority is slim, and I know that some of my colleagues on that side of the aisle oppose this irresponsible, harmful approach to government. I am ready to work with them, and anyone else, to pass a responsible budget that puts middle class families first.” 

    The House-passed budget resolution called for $4.8 trillion in deficit increases. Nearly all of that spending would fund extension of the 2017 Trump Tax Cuts, which disproportionately benefited the wealthiest households and corporations. The House plan offsets the cost with just $2 trillion in spending cuts, for a total $3.4 trillion increase to the national debt, including estimated interest payments. 

    The Senate plan attempts to hide the cost of extending the Trump Tax Cuts by using an accounting trick known as the “current policy baseline.” (“It’s like taking an expensive week-long vacation and then assuming you can spend an extra $1,000 per day forever since you are no longer staying at the Plaza,” said Marc Goldwein, senior vice president and senior policy director for the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, in an interview with the New York Times.) 

    An honest accounting of the Senate’s budget resolution shows that it includes $5.8 trillion in new borrowing — twice as much as the House plan and three times as much as the American Rescue Plan — while adding as much as $6.9 trillion to the national debt, including estimated interest payments. 

    The Senate resolution also retains language from the House bill instructing the House Energy and Commerce Committee to cut $880 billion in spending, a sum impossible to achieve without substantial cuts to Medicaid. Medicaid provides health coverage to 236,000 people in Maine’s 2nd Congressional District — more than one-third of the population — according to KFF.

    ###

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Australian assistance team deployed to Myanmar

    Source: Australia’s climate in 2024: 2nd warmest and 8th wettest year on record

    Australia has deployed a five person Australian Medical Assistance Team (AUSMAT) and a five person response team from the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT) and the National Emergency Management Agency (NEMA) to assist response and recovery efforts in Myanmar following the devastating earthquake.

    The natural disaster  has now claimed over 3,000 lives, with over 4,500 injured. This toll is expected to rise further. Myanmar’s health system is under immense pressure with extensive damage to hospitals and health centres, and demand for healthcare is far exceeding the system’s ability to respond.

    The AUSMAT team will help to coordinate the emergency medical response and will work closely with our Australia Assists Rapid Response Team, which has already been mobilised to help coordinate the international relief effort.

    These deployments build on the previous support Australia has announced. That support will deliver life-saving assistance through the International Committee of the Red Cross and Australian NGOs and their local partners, provide relief supplies and assist the work of the ASEAN Coordinating Centre for Humanitarian Assistance on Disaster Management.

    Australia does not provide any direct funding to the military regime and our humanitarian support to Myanmar is provided through thoroughly vetted international and local partners. We take proactive steps to ensure our assistance does not legitimise the military regime in Myanmar.

    Australia welcomes recent commitments to temporary, partial ceasefires. We call on the regime to continue to de-escalate the conflict and for all parties to implement, extend and broaden these ceasefire measures. It is critical that all parties work to provide a safe environment for the timely delivery of life-saving humanitarian assistance throughout Myanmar.

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI China: China encourages additional holidays for students

    Source: China State Council Information Office 2

    On a recent spring night, nearly a thousand drones took flight simultaneously at a college in southwest China’s Sichuan Province, lighting up the sky with messages like “set aside studies and work” and “savor our nation’s beauty” in announcing an upcoming seven-day break.
    “It was definitely a surprise when I first learned about the additional break. Most of us choose to travel with friends,” said a student at Sichuan Southwest Vocational College of Civil Aviation.
    Such spring breaks are now popular among Chinese schools and universities, as it provides more opportunities for students to connect with nature and engage in hands-on learning, while also unleashing great consumption vitality for the country.
    Traditionally, besides public holidays, students in China have only had breaks in summer and winter. Now, however, many higher education institutions, such as Renmin University of China in Beijing, allow students to enjoy extra breaks.
    Notably, additional breaks are becoming increasingly common for younger Chinese students as well. In March, Chinese authorities issued an action plan, encouraging regions with suitable conditions to implement spring and autumn breaks for primary and secondary schools based on local realities, with such breaks forming part of efforts to stimulate tourism-related consumption.
    To date, the plan has received positive responses from over a thousand schools in at least 12 provincial regions.
    In Guangzhou, south China’s Guangdong Province, a total of 310 students from Yuyan Middle School recently enjoyed an additional five-day holiday, going on a journey to explore history and science at sites like the Museum of Dr. Sun Yat-sen, the Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao Bridge and Zhuhai Aerospace Land. “While others are stuck in classrooms, we’re out enjoying ourselves,” a student said excitedly.
    According to the school, the break was a pilot program for seventh-grade students only, but it may be expanded to include other non-graduating grades next semester.
    The implementation of this plan has enjoyed broad public support. A 2024 online survey showed that 71.3 percent of respondents backed the idea of spring breaks for primary, secondary and college students. Many parents are particularly supportive of the new policy.
    The mother of an elementary school student in Hangzhou, east China’s Zhejiang Province, said she plans her work schedule ahead of time each year, arranging leave during her child’s spring break for family trips. During last year’s spring break, they traveled to Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region in northwest China, while this year they will visit the Three Gorges of the Yangtze River, experiencing its beauty by boat.
    Such arrangements are common among primary and secondary school parents in Hangzhou. As a result, the city’s major transport hubs experience a surge in travelers around the spring and autumn breaks.
    On April 28, 2024, the first day of Hangzhou’s spring break last year, the city’s international airport reported 904 scheduled flights, with an estimated 140,000 passengers — an over 10 percent increase from the previous week. Among the outbound travelers, families with children were a major group.
    In China’s tourism market, family travel is rapidly emerging as a strong consumption force. According to Trip.com, China’s leading online travel platform, family travel accounted for 28 percent of all travelers in 2023, with total travel bookings by this group surging 186 percent year on year.
    As the first Chinese city to introduce spring and autumn holidays for students, Hangzhou has been refining the system over the past two decades. “Overall, public feedback has been positive, with parents responding favorably,” said Tu Xiaodan, an official in charge of basic education at Hangzhou’s education bureau.
    These additional holidays help reduce academic pressure on students while enabling families to travel during off-peak periods. “This improves holiday quality and strengthens parent-child bonds,” Tu said, adding that in recent years, many officials from other regions have come to learn about the implementation of spring and autumn breaks in Hangzhou.
    Cities and schools exploring such seasonal breaks should plan them carefully — taking economy, climate and other factors into consideration, emphasized Luo Caijun, principal of Hangzhou Maiyuqiao Elementary School. “Adopting different vacation periods is essential in fulfilling the purpose of establishing the additional breaks,” he said.
    This off-peak travel approach effectively addresses the “tidal effect” in holiday economies, unlocks family spending power, and ensures more sustainable tourism market growth throughout the year.
    Additionally, this institutional reform transcends mere adjustments to vacation schedules, as it represents an evolution in educational philosophy and an optimization of public policy frameworks in China.
    “Education is not just about classrooms and books. It can happen in museums, libraries and in nature, too. Seasonal breaks are a vital upgrade to China’s education model,” said Dai Bin, president of the China Tourism Academy.
    The inclusion of these breaks in the action plan chapter on protecting rest and vacation rights, alongside measures like strictly enforcing paid annual leave and prohibiting illegal extension of working hours, sends a strong signal of emphasizing the protection of leisure rights, he added. 

    MIL OSI China News

  • MIL-OSI China: China reinvents ancestral veneration with green goodbyes

    Source: China State Council Information Office 2

    Amid gentle sea breezes and blooming memorial flowers, and through 3D-printed facial restoration of the deceased and AI-powered farewells, China is breathing new life into traditional tomb-sweeping rituals on Qingming Festival, which falls on Friday.
    With its dual identity as both a solar term and a festival, Qingming, which has a history of over 2,500 years, sees tens of millions honor ancestors through tomb-sweeping rituals, both on-site and online, embodying the Confucian ethos of “revering the departed to nurture virtue.”
    In a modern twist on Qingming customs, technological and ecological approaches now vie with the more familiar incense and paper offerings.
    Guided by green policies and shifting public attitudes, a quiet dialogue has unfolded between tradition and modernity, as green burials and minimalist tributes gain traction, blending the cultural heritage of this age-old Chinese day of remembrance with modern values.
    ETERNAL REST IN THE BLUE
    At dawn, 112 families boarded a charter boat off Tiger Beach in Dalian, a coastal city in northeast China’s Liaoning Province, and lowered biodegradable urns containing their loved ones’ ashes into the Bohai Sea.
    Chrysanthemum petals and handwritten memorial cards floated on the waves as seagulls circled above — a tranquil alternative to smoke-heavy traditional open-air ritual burning.
    “My father loved the ocean. Now, he’ll forever be a part of it,” said Yang Lijiao, who came from the provincial capital Shenyang, along with the other families on board. The ritual was organized by Shenyang’s only government-contracted sea burial service provider.
    Her eyes fixed on her father’s urn as it drifted away before slowly descending into the depths. “Wherever the ocean flows, Dad’s memory will live on.”
    Liaoning has pioneered sea burials for over a decade, offering services in cities like Dalian, Yingkou and Dandong. Official statistics show that a total of 71,386 sea burials were performed between 2012 and 2023, saving approximately 290,000 square meters of land — equivalent to 40 soccer fields.
    “Policy upgrades and public outreach have driven sea burial adoption,” explained Yao Ning from Shenyang’s civil affairs bureau. The province now provides subsidies of up to 2,000 yuan (about 278 U.S. dollars) per sea burial.
    In 2016, China’s Ministry of Civil Affairs and eight other departments jointly issued guidelines promoting land-saving eco-burials, encouraging sustainable ashes disposition via sea or tree burials, or urn storage.
    To date, 28 provincial-level regions nationwide have adopted eco-burial policies with financial incentives and infrastructure investments, according to an official with the ministry. Multiple regions now offer higher sea burial subsidies, streamlined procedures and humane services, driving growing public adoption.
    Beijing has conducted nearly 40,000 sea burials since 1994, now representing 4 percent of the city’s annual cremations. In the neighboring Hebei Province, 30 pilot eco-burial sites were green-lighted last year, aiming to set the stage for gradual province-wide adoption.
    “Traditional burial practices have become unsustainable in their land consumption,” said Wang Yi, associate professor at Tianjin University, adding that the shift in Qingming rituals reflects the public’s growing ecological awareness. “Sea and tree burials, with their land-free designs, offer sustainable alternatives that reduce pressure on limited land resources.”
    TECH WARMS GOODBYES
    During a recent open day at the Guangzhou Funeral & Interment Service Center in south China, local residents observed technology merging with tradition: 3D-printed facial restoration of the departed, AI-curated memorial videos reviving personal histories, and robotic urn bearers operating with ceremonial precision.
    In the center’s mortuary restoration lab, Li Fajun, a mortician, led a team using 3D scanning and printing to recreate lifelike facial contours for the deceased. Their “3D wound mapping” technique digitally reconstructs facial features with unprecedented accuracy, allowing highly authentic reconstruction for those whose appearances were affected by trauma or illness.
    Through a meticulous process combining 3D-printed molds and specialized cosmetic techniques, the departed can be restored to their natural appearance for their final goodbyes. The lab has also secured national patents for its self-developed high-efficiency composite embalming agent and 3D-printed surface restoration device.
    “These patented technologies allow families to see their loved ones at peace,” Li said. “We’re not just repairing appearances. We’re healing families’ grief.”
    Among the team’s younger members is Zhao Zhihui, a mortuary science graduate, who regards the work as “building the last bridge between the departed and their loved ones.”
    As technology reshapes modern life, it’s also redefining how China faces death, with growing numbers embracing innovative approaches such as AI memorials or virtual ceremonies to honor their departed loved ones.
    Beyond Guangzhou, tech-infused memorials are reshaping China’s funeral culture. In Beijing, over 100,000 families have opted for “life gemstones” — cremated ashes transformed into crystalline keepsakes via high-pressure synthesis. Meanwhile, Dalian’s sea burial memorials feature LED walls displaying names, embodying the growing acceptance of “returning to nature.”
    “Tech-driven memorials reflect modern trends,” commented Wang, noting that faster lifestyles and greater mobility reduce opportunities for physical grave visits, she linked this shift to digital memorials’ growth, whose efficiency and visual appeal further boost adoption. Yet AI shouldn’t replace all traditions, she warned, as rites like tomb-sweeping demand physical presence, a practice central to filial piety that virtual interactions cannot replicate.
    Hong Chang, professor at Tianjin Foreign Studies University, viewed AI-assisted memorials and sea burials as adaptations of tradition to modernization, with AI streamlining remembrance and eco-burials addressing environmental concerns. “Yet we should balance innovation with cultural heritage as we retain the essence of Qingming rituals.”
    These innovations signal a societal shift: as environmental awareness grows, Chinese families increasingly honor the departed through more diverse practices from AI-preserved memories to green burials. This fusion of technology and sustainability creates new forms of reverence without severing ties to tradition. 

    MIL OSI China News

  • MIL-OSI China: California aims to forge own trade path amid US tariffs

    Source: China State Council Information Office 3

    California Governor Gavin Newsom announced a bold initiative on Friday to shield the state’s economy from the impacts of the U.S. tariff policies by pursuing independent trade relationships with international partners.

    “Donald Trump’s tariffs do not represent all Americans,” Newsom said in a video message. “California remains a stable trading partner,” he said, directing his administration to pursue new trade opportunities globally.

    The move came just two days after U.S. President Donald Trump announced sweeping tariffs, including a 10-percent “minimum baseline tariff” on all imports, with higher rates for certain trading partners, effective on April 5.

    The new tariffs have drawn backlash from economies around the world, with countermeasures already pledged by some. Newsom urged the state’s “long-standing trade partners” to exempt California-made products from any retaliatory measures.

    “California leads the nation as the #1 state for agriculture and manufacturing — and it’s our workers, families, and farmers who stand to lose the most from this Trump tax hike and trade war,” said the governor in a statement.

    “To our international partners: As the fifth largest economy in the world, the Golden State will remain a steady, reliable partner for generations to come, no matter the turbulence coming out of Washington. California is not Washington, D.C.”

    With a gross domestic product of 3.9 trillion U.S. dollars, California is the largest importer among all U.S. states, with more than 675 billion dollars in two-way trade supporting millions of jobs across the state. Its economy is 50 percent bigger than the GDP of the nation’s next largest state, Texas, according to the governor’s office.

    The initiative directed the state administration to identify collaborative opportunities with trading partners that protect California’s economic interests, including workers, manufacturers and businesses, as well as broader supply chains linked to the state’s economy.

    The tariffs announced by the Trump administration could result in a 2.3 percent increase in overall inflation in the United States this year, including a 2.8 percent increase in food prices and an 8.4 percent increase in automotive prices. The tariffs’ impact could cost the average household 3,800 dollars a year, according to analysis by the Budget Lab at Yale University.

    Newsom is particularly concerned about the state’s agricultural sector. California produces about 80 percent of the world’s almonds, generating an industry worth approximately 5.6 billion dollars and supporting more than 100,000 jobs.

    The almond industry alone contributes about 11 billion dollars in added value to California’s economy, according to industry data. About 70 percent of the state’s almond crop is exported to more than 100 economies worldwide.

    Beyond agriculture, Newsom’s administration was concerned about disruptions to the state’s manufacturing sector. Manufactured goods dominate both California’s exports (87 percent) and imports (89 percent), making the state particularly vulnerable to tariff impacts.

    The Port of Los Angeles, a major trade hub, anticipates a possible 10 percent decrease in cargo volume due to the tariffs, which could result in job losses in the port and related industries.

    The governor’s initiative also aimed to safeguard access to critical construction materials needed for recovery efforts following the recent Los Angeles wildfires. Officials noted that current tariffs on Canadian lumber of 14 percent could rise to nearly 27 percent, hampering rebuilding efforts.

    State officials also expressed concern about supply chains between California and Baja, Mexico. They argued that taxing component goods each time they cross the border will raise final product prices for Californians.

    Moreover, the Sacramento Bee reported Friday that Newsom faced another serious question: “How much of a problem will tariffs be for the state’s economy, which is heavily reliant upon high-income earners, many of whom draw their wealth from stocks.”

    The UCLA Anderson Forecast issued a recession watch last month, citing tariffs as one factor in a possible downturn. But there are others, notably Trump’s crackdown on undocumented immigrants, which the Forecast saw as having the potential for reducing the labor pool in the state.

    Though legal experts noted that individual states do not have the constitutional authority to independently negotiate global trading deals regarding tariffs, as this power is reserved for the federal government, California has been cultivating relationships with foreign governments and officials independent of the current federal administration.

    California has a history of active engagement in international trade through various agreements and initiatives. It has entered into 38 international agreements with 28 different foreign partners, according to the governor’s office.

    The state government has established the International Affairs and Trade Development Interagency Committee, which advises Newsom on international trade matters and coordinates related state activities, and California maintains trade and investment desks in key markets to further its international economic objectives. 

    MIL OSI China News

  • MIL-OSI Security: Man jailed for multiple offences including cyber-flashing

    Source: United Kingdom London Metropolitan Police

    A survivor of domestic abuse has encouraged others to report to police and get the justice they deserve, on the day her perpetrator was jailed.

    Adam Woodhouse, 35 (15/10/1989) of Edrick Walk, HA8 appeared at Harrow Crown Court on Friday, 4 April where he was jailed for five years, after previously being convicted of multiple offences including cyber-flashing, arson with intent and stalking.

    Woodhouse subjected the victim to a year of abuse after their relationship ended. This included bombarding her with hundreds of abusive messages and phone calls, recording videos of her outside her address and smashing her garden pots and car windows. Amongst the excessive messages, Woodhouse text the victim saying “I will go to prison for murder of you.”

    In July 2024, Woodhouse broke into the victim’s address, stealing all sets of house keys and her car.

    Woodhouse continued to bombard the victim with abuse and in September 2024, he set fire to a moped outside her address, trapping the victim and her children inside. Following a quick response by the London Fire Brigade, those inside were rescued and uninjured. After the fire, Woodhouse called the victim and laughed at her, gloating about his actions. Whilst evading police for the arson offence, Woodhouse then sent images of his genitals to the victim which were unsolicited and threatening.

    He was arrested on 30 September in Lincolnshire. During interview, Woodhouse was extremely aggressive towards officers, stealing interview papers and swearing. Whilst in the custody cell, he urinated over the cell and under the door. He was further arrested for criminal damage.

    After being charged, Woodhouse pleaded guilty to arson with intent to endanger life, stalking, cyber-flashing, burglary, taking without consent and criminal damage.

    He appeared at Harrow Crown Court on Friday, 4 April where he was sentenced to five years in prison. He was also issued with a lifetime restraining order against the victim after being described as a “dangerous offender” by the judge.

    Following the sentencing, the victim said:

    “What Adam has put my children and I through has ruined our lives completely, and I would never want any other woman to go through this.

    “I would say to any other women who are experiencing domestic abuse to be brave, come forward and get support from the police to get the justice you deserve.

    “I have felt very supported by DC Olivia Fox and from working closely together we have managed to get justice today.”

    Detective Constable Olivia Fox from the North West Public Protection Unit said:

    “Woodhouse demonstrated that he was an abusive domestic perpetrator, repeatedly targeting this young woman to the point this abuse took over her life.

    “Woodhouse made it his mission to make this woman’s life hell and treated her like she was a possession that he owned. He would then ‘love-bomb’ her and attempt to persuade her that she needed him.

    “She was so terrified of Woodhouse that she initially withdrew supporting the investigation out of fear.

    “It takes an brave person to pick up with an emotionally draining investigation again and I commend her tenacity and strength. I hope that today’s sentence allows her to move forward with her life.”

    “Victims of domestic abuse can often feel lonely and isolated and I understand that many have perceptions that the police won’t be able to help.

    “We are better trained than ever to investigate reports of domestic abuse and will continue to work with our partner agencies to ensure that all victims of domestic abuse get justice.”

    To read more about the ongoing work from Met Police to tackle violence against women and girls, read more here: 100th conviction as part of Met’s VAWG crackdown | Metropolitan Police

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Construction starts for a new Wyndham Vale Station

    Source:

    Wyndham Vale Fire Brigade with CO Jason Heffernan, Cpt Trevor Weston, ACFO Tony Field, Minister Vicki Ward, MP John Lister and Cr Peter Maynard

    Construction has commenced on a new modernised fire station for members of the Wyndham Vale Fire Brigade, with an official turning of the sod ceremony marking the occasion this week.

    CFA Chief Officer Jason Heffernan joined CFA Acting Assistant Chief Fire Officer Tony Field, Wyndham Vale Captain Trevor Weston, members, and dignitaries at the new site to observe the start of the works on Saturday, 5 April.

    The new Wyndham Vale Fire Station being developed at Armstrong Road, Manor Lakes will replace the existing nearby station currently at Ballan Road, Manor Lakes that houses three appliances and 42 volunteers.

    Wyndham Vale Captain Trevor Weston said the brigade is excited to mark the start of the highly anticipated building process and expand their brigade offering.

    “It is great to see some progress on the site. We’ve been in the temporary location for some time now and the fit-for-purpose building is going to be a fantastic benefit for both the brigade and our community,” Trevor said.

    “At the moment we only have a small kitchenette and have been testing hoses and washing our fire trucks out the front of the station, so the bigger space is going to make such a difference for not only safety purposes but also accessibility.

    “We’ve got a significant number of people keen to join the brigade and we’re hopeful we can get a junior program up and running, so we’re really pleased to have a space to grow the brigade further.

    “We’ll be able to have more firefighters on the ground to respond and more community educators out and about to raise awareness at events.”

    The new urban station will feature a motor room with three drive-in bays, storage space, operational areas and a multipurpose room. Outside, members will have use of a carpark, and a four-bay external storage shed.

    CFA Chief Officer Jason Heffernan said the new amenities within the station will help the brigade’s response to cater for the fast-expanding community in Wyndham Vale.

    “It’s also positive to see the inclusion of separate turn-out spaces for men and women and accessible unisex amenities for our volunteers,” Jason said. 

    “The station has also been designed with sustainability in mind, with a solar panel system, provision for future installation of an electrical vehicle charging station, rainwater recycling, and water sensitive designs within the landscaping.

    “The brigade has averaged 422 callouts a year for the last three, and I have no doubt this new state of the art station will serve both the brigade and the community for many years to come.”

    Previously a satellite station of Werribee Fire Brigade, Wyndham Vale was formed in 2011 to proactively address a risk environment with significant urban and population growth.

    Brigade members have attended numerous significant incidents and campaign fires including the 2009 and 2019/2020 bushfires.

    Construction of the new station is expected to be complete in early 2026. 

    Submitted by CFA Media

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Little River welcome new Ultralight Tanker

    Source:

    CO Jason Heffernan, Cpt Greg Archer, MP John Lister, Minister Vicki Ward, Mick Webb, Garry Green, Cr Peter Maynard, Belinda Webb

    Little River Fire Brigade has officially received the keys to their new Ultralight Tanker, celebrating the modernised addition to the engine bay alongside fellow members and family.

    CFA Chief Officer Jason Heffernan joined dignitaries at the fire station to handover the vehicle to eager brigade members on Saturday morning (5 April).

    Little River Captain Greg Archer said the new Ultralight will be a valuable addition to the brigade’s fleet, as it is more agile and allows access to narrow areas that they often encounter.

    “All members will be able to safely head to the fireground now in this vehicle after completing training. You also only require a car licence as opposed to a truck licence which opens it up to more drivers,” Greg said.

    “This will allow for a more efficient response to protect the community and an increase in attendance to emergencies.

    “Enhanced features like the improved lighting and the live hose reel have already been a big help on our callouts. 

    “It will also be a great resource to have with our Heavy Tankers during our incident responses, but also when deployed to strike teams for campaign bushfires, much like those we attended recently in the Grampians, Beaufort and Dereel.”

    The new Ultralight Tanker holds 550L of water with a Class A Foam System, a pump and other vital firefighting equipment.

    CFA Chief Officer Jason Heffernan said the new Ultralight Tanker incorporates a crew protection system to help ensure volunteers have the best possible chance of survival during a burnover.

    “The brigade members will be protected with a compressed air foam external deluge system, radiant heat shield curtains, and fire blankets,” Jason said.

    “It also allows the brigade to stow and display items in larger internal cabs, lockers and on aluminium trays.

    “The brigade’s response area covers one of the biggest in the district, including small acreage farm lets, grassland reserves, freeways and railway lines. The community will benefit greatly from the brigade’s enhanced capability with this refreshed vehicle.”

    The new Ultralight was purchased through the Victorian Government’s Volunteer Emergency Services Equipment Program (VESEP).

    To secure the funding, the brigade of 29-members, contributed over $11,350 through fundraising, BBQs and tin rattling, with assistance from Bendigo Bank Lara who donated a further $12,000.

    Four brigade members were also acknowledged on the day for their dedicated years of service, receiving awards that spanned up to 55 years of community contribution.

    Submitted by CFA media

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI China: A former football captain turning into business trailblazer

    Source: China State Council Information Office

    From an unheralded football player to a businessman across multiple sectors, Wang Dong’s journey over the past 10 years has been more dramatic than most.

    Wang began playing football at age 4 and went to a school known for its football tradition when he was 7. It was during his junior high school years that he discovered his deep interest in the sport. He then attended a football school in Beijing, where he resolved to become a professional player.

    For Wang, the beginning seemed promising. Possessing both talent and ability, he was selected for the junior team of Beijing Guoan and, at the age of 17, was promoted to its first team.

    However, things began to go awry as a young and less adaptable Wang struggled to handle the pressure. Additionally, the presence of established figures within the club, including Xu Yunlong and Shao Jiayi, made it challenging for him to stand out.

    During his 12 years with Guoan, where the team won the 2009 Chinese Super League (CSL), Wang received limited playing time, which ultimately led to his decision to leave.

    In 2010, he joined Shenzhen FC, where he became a key player and later the captain. However, due to the team’s relegation, unpaid wages, and his subsequent methods of demanding pay ment, he found it difficult to return to the club and the field, ultimately leading to his retirement.

    “At 30, a prime age for a footballer, retirement was tough for me,” Wang admitted. “But it was the long wait that made me realize that my football career did not give me a greater sense of fulfillment.”

    With limited education and a lack of social experience, he initially felt lost.

    However, his athletic background provided him with knowledge about diet and nutrition, which inspired his decision to enter the catering industry. He introduced Chaoshan beef hotpot, a dish popular in south China’s Guangdong Province, to his hometown, the northern Chinese city of Tianjin.

    He traveled to Shantou City, the birthplace of Chaoshan beef hotpot, where he spent four months working as a kitchen helper in a restaurant to learn how to prepare the cuisine.

    This period was the most challenging. He had to work 15 hours a day and lived in a cramped dormitory shared by eight people. Without air conditioning, the dormitory was stifling and humid during the summer.

    Despite feeling hesitant to admit his former identity when diners asked if he was the football player Wang Dong, he considered the experience valuable as it allowed him to master the art of making the delicacy and earn a living before opening his own restaurant in Tianjin.

    The initial days of his restaurant were difficult. He had to wake up at 4 or 5 a.m. to purchase fresh beef and would close the restaurant late at night after the last diners left, resulting in a 10-kilogram weight loss within a month.

    After navigating this challenging period, Wang’s business began to grow rapidly. He not only opened multiple branches of his restaurant in Tianjin but also expanded to other provinces and cities across China.

    “I was among the first to introduce Chaoshan beef hotpot to Tianjin and gained the early market advantages,” Wang noted.

    As this year marks the 10th anniversary of Wang’s retirement from professional football, his business interests have broadened beyond catering to include sports, health care, cinemas, tourism, animal husbandry, and real estate.

    Among these diverse ventures, he has a particular interest in the sports industry, encompassing training, venue operation, equipment, and rehabilitation. He has also sponsored CSL club Tianjin Jinmen Tiger.

    “As I was an athlete, sport is part of my DNA,” he said. 

    MIL OSI China News

  • MIL-OSI China: ‘Reciprocal tariffs’ only lead to reciprocal losses, suffering

    Source: China State Council Information Office

    The world is approaching painful times as the U.S. administration’s so-called “reciprocal tariffs” arrive. It is an undeniable reality that the United States is unabashedly wielding hegemony in an attempt to secure its interests, but these measures may well end up backfiring.

    For its major trading partners, U.S. enthusiasm for tariffs is nothing new. The latest evidence suggests that the U.S. administration will impose a 10 percent “minimum baseline tariff,” and even higher rates on certain trading partners.

    To some extent, Washington’s flagrant bullying practice indicates the U.S. administration’s growing jitters and anxiety concerning the retention of its position of superiority in an increasingly globalized world. However, it’s ridiculous that the United States opts for protectionism instead of embracing the trend of the times. Playing the “tariff card” is a lose-lose game that also hurts the United States itself.

    If the U.S. administration does follow through with its tariff plans, it would further elevate what are already the nation’s highest tariff levels over the past decades. Leading U.S. economists have warned of high implementation costs and collectively voiced concerns about grave consequences — such as higher consumer prices, increased inflation, a rise in unemployment, and even an economic recession.

    According to a Yale University study, reciprocal tariffs will incur the United States a price level rise of 2.1 percent, should other countries choose to retaliate. This is equivalent to a loss of 2,700 to 3,400 U.S. dollars per household on average. Meanwhile, overall U.S. economic growth will drop by 1 percentage point in 2025.

    Notably, classical Western economics underlines the benefits of free trade and the division of labor. America should know it can never return to the primary ends of the global supply chain in all sectors. What the U.S. administration is doing goes against basic economic laws.

    It is not possible for the United States to deny that it has benefited a lot from free trade and a multilateral trading system. After all, this system substantially lowered living costs and raised living standards for people in the United States over the past decades.

    Tariffs will cause damage across the board. Retaliation is almost certain and likely to be considerable. By announcing the so-called “reciprocal tariffs” scheme, the U.S. administration is dealing a heavy blow to the world trading system and the global economy at large.

    For example, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), in its latest Economic Outlook, forecast that global GDP growth is projected to moderate to 3.1 percent in 2025 and 3 percent in 2026. The OECD is also warning that higher and broader trade barriers will negatively impact growth around the world and add to inflation.

    Any attempt to curb trade flows in the global village will backfire. Unchecked protectionism has the very real potential to trigger trade wars, with catastrophic consequences for all parties concerned, while also destabilizing the global economy. A stable and predictable trading environment should not be a luxury. It is a necessity for healthy global economic growth. Equal dialogue is the only viable approach to resolving trade disputes while bullying tariffs make things worse.

    Building a better world requires shelving the obsession with tariffs and pursuing shared development based on openness and cooperation. 

    MIL OSI China News

  • MIL-OSI China: China launches dual probes into imported medical CT tubes

    Source: China State Council Information Office

    China’s Ministry of Commerce said on Friday that it has launched an anti-dumping probe into certain imports of medical CT tubes originating from the United States and India, as well as a separate industrial competitiveness investigation into broader imports of medical CT tubes.

    The anti-dumping investigation, in response to the application from the domestic industry, concerns certain ball-bearing medical CT tubes originating from the United States and India, an official with the ministry said in an online statement.

    Preliminary evidence submitted by the applicants shows that from 2022 to 2024, the volume of dumped imports of these products from the two countries increased by 13 percent, while their prices continued to decline, the official said, adding that these imports have depressed domestic prices, resulting in operating difficulties and losses for domestic producers.

    After reviewing the application in accordance with Chinese laws and regulations, and World Trade Organization (WTO) rules, the investigation authority determined that the conditions for initiating an anti-dumping probe were met and decided to open the case, the official said.

    The investigation authority will carry out the probe in accordance with laws and make decisions based on the findings in an objective and impartial manner, the official added.

    In a separate move, the ministry has also launched its first industrial competitiveness probe into a broader range of imported medical CT tubes.

    While both probes were initiated at the request of the domestic industry, they differ in terms of scope and focus, the official explained.

    The industrial competitiveness probe was in accordance with relevant stipulations of China’s foreign trade law, a spokesperson of the ministry said in a separate statement.

    Preliminary evidence submitted by the applicants suggested that China’s medical CT tube industry started relatively late and remains in a developmental stage. The domestic industry is facing operational difficulties due to the impact of imports, which has adversely affected its competitiveness, said the spokesperson.

    The spokesperson emphasized that the industrial competitiveness probe is a fact-finding investigation, does not target any specific country or region, and does not affect normal trade, adding that the investigation authority will ensure the legal rights of all interested parties and carry out the investigation objectively and fairly in accordance with the law. 

    MIL OSI China News

  • MIL-OSI China: What’s next for S. Korea after Yoon removed from office

    Source: China State Council Information Office

    South Korea’s constitutional court on Friday upheld a motion by the National Assembly to impeach the country’s president Yoon Suk-yeol over his short-lived martial law imposition.

    The conservative leader officially lost all presidential power, becoming the country’s second sitting president to be forcibly removed from power following former conservative President Park Geun-hye’s ouster through impeachment in 2017.

    WHAT ABOUT YOON

    Moon Hyung-bae, acting chief of the court, read a ruling on Yoon’s impeachment, saying it was a unanimous decision of eight justices.

    The acting chief said Yoon broke his duty of protecting the constitution as he damaged the constitutional institutions, such as the parliament, and violated the basic rights of people by mobilizing the military and the police.

    Following his removal from office, Yoon must vacate the presidential residence in central Seoul. Local media predicted that he may return to his private house, but it remains unclear whether he will leave the official residence immediately.

    According to South Korea’s law on the treatment of former presidents, a president who is removed from office due to impeachment loses most of the post-retirement privileges granted under normal circumstances.

    This includes the loss of pension, office space, vehicle, and secretarial support. Only basic security protection will be provided.

    Yoon will face criminal trial as a normal citizen over his alleged involvement in an attempted insurrection. South Korea’s prosecution indicted Yoon on an insurrection charge on Jan. 26 after he was arrested in the presidential residence on Jan. 15.

    POLITICAL AND SOCIAL CONFLICTS

    Yoon had been facing challenges from opposition parties since he took office. Last April, the ruling party suffered a crushing defeat in parliamentary elections, further weakening the government.

    After over two years in office, Yoon used veto power 25 times against bills passed by the opposition-led National Assembly. As a result, issues such as healthcare and pension reform, led by the Yoon administration, have faced significant legislative resistance.

    The political conflicts have deepened social conflict. A report by the Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs released in March found that public perception of “social conflict” reached its highest level since 2018, with the most severe divide between progressives and conservatives.

    Local newspaper Chosun Ilbo observed that ideological conflicts, more than regional or wealth disparities, have become a major obstacle to South Korea’s social unity.

    After a motion to impeach Yoon was passed in the National Assembly on Dec. 14 over his botched martial law imposition, polarization and conflicts became even more pronounced, leading to growing hatred and extreme emotions.

    The delay in the constitutional court has also intensified conflicts between conservative and progressive factions, making street protests a daily occurrence and further fracturing society, said Lee Jaemook, a professor at the Department of Political Science and Diplomacy of Hankuk University of Foreign Studies.

    EARLY ELECTION

    After Yoon is removed from office, South Korea must hold an early presidential election within 60 days. Currently, the leading candidate is Lee Jae-myung from the Democratic Party of Korea, though uncertainty remains.

    According to an NBS poll on Thursday, Lee has a 33-percent approval rating, leading by about 24 percentage points over the second-highest contender, the minister of employment and labor, Kim Moon Soo.

    Given the deepening political polarization and Yoon’s impeachment, the key to determining the election outcome will be the support of centrist voters and the non-partisan electorate, according to local media reports.

    Although the impeachment has created a more favorable environment for progressives, the conservative camp remains unified, which could lead to a balanced contest, said Professor Choi Yong-tae of Chonnam National University.

    MIL OSI China News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Padilla, Mullin, Tillis Introduce Bipartisan Bill to Increase Access to Specialty Care in Rural Communities

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator Alex Padilla (D-Calif.)

    Padilla, Mullin, Tillis Introduce Bipartisan Bill to Increase Access to Specialty Care in Rural Communities

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — U.S. Senators Alex Padilla (D-Calif.), Markwayne Mullin (R-Okla.), and Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) introduced the Ensuring Access to Specialty Care Everywhere (EASE) Act, bipartisan legislation that will increase access to specialty care for rural and underserved Medicare, Medicaid, and Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) patients. 
    People living in rural communities have much higher wait times and have to travel much farther for appointments with specialists, such as in cardiology, oncology, and endocrinology, which are crucial for managing chronic conditions. Shortages of specialists in the area, continued closures of rural health facilities, and a lack of adequate public transportation have further increased these wait times, which is directly correlated with appointment cancellation or postponement rates.
    “Everyone deserves access to quality, efficient health care. However, people in rural communities often face unacceptable barriers to care, including unsustainably high wait times and impossibly long drives to connect with specialists,” said Senator Padilla. “Our bipartisan EASE Act would expand telehealth capabilities so rural communities can access specialty care, allowing for earlier intervention and reducing unnecessary emergency visits.”
    “Rural communities are disproportionately impacted by clinician shortages, an aging population, and transportation hurdles, which decrease individuals’ access to specialty care,” said Senator Mullin. “Harnessing the power of telehealth will address these needs and increase access to quality health care, of which many patients are in desperate need. I am glad to join my colleagues in reintroducing this bill to ensure access to quality health care regardless of a patients’ zip code.”
    “Telehealth has become an invaluable tool in increasing access to quality care for all Americans,” said Senator Tillis. “However, too many individuals in rural and underserved communities still face serious challenges in accessing specialty care, which results in worse outcomes and higher costs. This legislation leverages technology to create a virtual specialty network to ensure everyone – regardless of location – receives the necessary care when and where they need it.”
    “The National Rural Health Association applauds Senators Mullin and Padilla and Representatives Arrington, Salinas, and LaHood and for the introduction of the EASE Act. A shortage of health care providers in rural areas means that patients can often have long wait times and challenges accessing needed specialty care. The EASE Act is an innovative piece of legislation that would leverage virtual technologies to reduce wait times, overcome geographic barriers, and improve care for rural Americans,” said Alan Morgan, National Rural Health Association.
    “We need to rethink how we ensure Rural America’s access to specialty care. The EASE Act is an innovative and cost-effective way to provide reliable and integrated access to specialists. OCHIN applauds Senators Mullin and Padilla for championing bi-partisan solutions that will redesign how high-quality care is delivered,” said Jennifer Stoll, Chief External Affairs Officer at OCHIN.
    Specifically, the EASE Act would require the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation (CMMI) to establish a pilot digital platform to improve access to specialty health services for Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries in rural communities through the creation of a virtual specialty care network that connects individuals and their primary care provider with specialists digitally.
    Representatives Jodey Arrington (R-Texas-19) and Andrea Salinas (D-Ore.-06) lead companion legislation in the House.
    The EASE Act is supported by the following groups: National Rural Health Association, America’s Health Centers (AHC), National Association of Community Health Centers, City of Hope Cancer Centers, American Podiatric Medical Association, Society of Interventional Radiology, Lupus and Allied Diseases Association, ATA Action, National Association of Rural Health Clinics, American Alliance of Orthopedic Executives, and LIBRE.
    Senator Padilla has long been a leader in the fight to make health care more equitable in the United States. Last year, Padilla, Senator Mazie Hirono (D-Hawaii) and Senator Cory Booker (D-N.J.) introduced the Health Equity and Accountability Act (HEAA) of 2024 to address health disparities among racial and ethnic minorities as well as women, the LGBTQ+ community, rural populations, and socioeconomically disadvantaged communities across the United States. Padilla and Booker also introduced the Equal Health Care for All Act, bicameral legislation that would make equal access to medical care a protected civil right to help address the racial inequities and structural failures in America’s health care system.
    Full text of the bill is available here.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: WATCH: Padilla Blasts Republican Budget Bill That Will Raise Costs for Working-Class Families

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator Alex Padilla (D-Calif.)

    WATCH: Padilla Blasts Republican Budget Bill That Will Raise Costs for Working-Class Families

    WATCH: Padilla on Republican tax cuts for the wealthy: “When is enough enough?”

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — Today, U.S. Senator Alex Padilla (D-Calif.), a member of the Senate Budget Committee, denounced President Trump and Republicans’ partisan budget bill that will massively raise costs for working-class Americans in order to deliver $5.3 trillion in tax cuts for the ultra-wealthy. In his speech on the Senate floor, Padilla stressed that these tax breaks for billionaires will require cuts to services Americans depend on like Medicaid and nutrition assistance.

    Padilla tied the budget bill back to Republicans’ tax cuts for the wealthy during the first Trump Administration, asking “when is enough enough?” He emphasized that Trump’s tariffs will only further compound the challenge of rising costs for Americans.

    • “What Republicans were successful in doing was passing a historic tax break for the wealthiest Americans. It added nearly $2 trillion to our nation’s debt. Deficit hawks, are you listening? $2 trillion that could have gone to improve public schools, could have gone to address the housing supply challenges in our nation, could have gone to helping lift children and families out of poverty. But no. A tax break for the wealthiest Americans and some of the largest corporations on the planet.”
    • When is enough enough? Because since the day Donald Trump took office for a second term, we continue to see prices going up, not down. Yes, the President that promised to lower prices on day one, through his statements, through his rhetoric, through his policies and actions, has led to price increases across the board.”
    • “Consumers are paying more. It’s like a tax increase. … So where’s the money going? This is the deja vu part. Their efforts to once again cut taxes for large corporations and the wealthiest in America, the billionaire class, if you will. … So I ask the question again, when is enough enough?

    Padilla underscored that over 70 million Americans and 15 million Californians rely on Medicaid, yet Trump and Republicans’ partisan budget plan would mean hundreds of billions of dollars in cuts to the program, despite Republican claims that it is not on the chopping block. He later spotlighted stories about recipients of California’s Medicaid program, Medi-Cal, who fear the catastrophic consequences of Republicans’ attempts to cut lifesaving Medicaid services again.

    • “They continue to pursue their agenda of relief, tax breaks for the wealthiest Americans because they need some extra spending money at the expense of the health of children and families. When is enough enough?
    • “A vote for this budget — there’s no way to add it up differently — a vote for this budget resolution is a vote to cut Medicaid, no ifs, ands, or buts. Republicans in the House have been clear, and it’s the only way to read the bill before us today. So to my colleagues, again, when is enough enough?

    Padilla highlighted his personal upbringing, growing up in the working-class community of Pacoima, California where for 40 years, his dad worked as a short order cook and his mom cleaned houses. He emphasized that lower-income families and communities like the one he grew up in will be devastated by rising costs and the elimination of their hard-earned benefits.

    • “Our home was filled with a lot of love, a lot of discipline, a lot of sacrifice. There were times when it was tough. There were times when money was more than just tight. So when you hear people talk about, oh, families that live paycheck to paycheck, I know what that means. I know what it means for so many families across the country who just a couple hundred dollars difference makes a huge difference. I know the stress, the anxiety of when the car unexpectedly breaks down, and you look at your savings account, and on the one hand, you may not have enough to pay for repairs, but you also know… you can’t afford to not get to work.”
    • “It’s the same spirit of families like mine and the community like the one I grew up in that says I’m not interested in a handout. I just want a fair shot. I’m willing to work hard to get ahead. I’m willing to work hard to provide for my family. I’m willing to work hard to make sure my kids have a better shot at the American dream than I do. But that is not the spirit of the bill that we’re going to be entertaining today. In fact, it’s the opposite.”
    • “This Republican tax/budget bill makes life harder for working families, makes working families pay more to subsidize tax breaks for the rich. You know what: to add insult to injury, where they’re seeking to cut to afford these tax rates for the wealthy are the very benefits that hardworking families have paid into through their taxes. These are benefits that they have earned. And so I ask again, colleagues, when is enough enough?

    Padilla closed his speech by making clear that the vote on the budget resolution shows where every Senator stands on supporting working families or billionaires and big corporations.

    • “Let the history show: do you stand with the wealthy or do you stand with the working class? I choose to stand with the hardworking families across the country that work hard to make communities in our country thrive.”

    Video of Senator Padilla’s full remarks is available here.

    Footage of his remarks can be downloaded here.

    Senator Padilla has been a vocal critic of the Republican budget bill that lays the groundwork to give massive handouts to billionaires at the expense of working-class Americans. Last week, Padilla criticized Republicans’ billionaire-first tax plans at a rally alongside other lawmakers, labor and grassroots advocates, and hundreds of Americans from across the country who will suffer because of this harmful tax proposal. Earlier this year, Padilla outlined Republicans’ misguided budget proposal in a Senate Budget Committee hearing. He also recently proposed a concurrent resolution would simply demand basic transparency by requiring that any tariff used to offset tax cuts for the wealthy be explicitly written into the Republicans’ partisan budget reconciliation bill. Padilla continues to raise the alarm about Republican efforts to cut critical services and benefits Californians rely on, including Medicaid, Social Security, and nutrition assistance.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Reed Calls for IG Probe into Commerce Sec’s ‘Buy Tesla’ Pitch

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Rhode Island Jack Reed

    WASHINGTON, DC – U.S. Senator Jack Reed (D-RI) is calling for an independent watchdog to investigate Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick’s self-dealing call for Americans to buy Tesla stock. 

    On March 19, after Tesla’s stock price had fallen considerably over the previous month, Secretary Lutnick – whose Wall Street investment firm owns 739,920 Tesla shares and millions of options on Tesla stock — appeared on Fox News urging the public to buy Tesla stock.  Lutnick said: “If you want to learn something on this show tonight, buy Tesla.  It’s unbelievable that this guy’s stock is this cheap. It’ll never be this cheap again.”

    Federal ethics rules explicitly prohibit officials appointed to the executive branch, such as cabinet members, from using their position to promote private businesses.  And federal conflict-of-interest laws prohibit officials from taking actions using their public position to benefit their personal financial interests.

    Senator Reed is asking the Acting Inspector General of the U.S. Department of Commerce and the Acting Director of the U.S. Office of Government Ethics to open a probe into whether Secretary Lutnick violated federal law barring public officials from promoting any “product, service or enterprise,” and seeking information about Secretary Lutnick’s compliance with Federal ethics rules and whether he or his family financially profited from the cabinet official unethically using his office to pump up the stock price.

    “I write to urge you to open an investigation into Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick for encouraging viewers to buy Tesla stock during an appearance on Fox News,” Senator Reed wrote to the Commerce Department’s Acting Inspector General.  “On March 19, Mr. Lutnick sat for an interview in his official capacity and told the American people, “If you want to learn something on this show tonight, it’s ‘buy Tesla.’ It’s unbelievable that [Elon Musk’s] stock is so cheap. It’ll never be this cheap again.”  He also predicted that each American would be buying “a Telsa robot, and anyone who doesn’t buy a Tesla robot is going to be silly.””

    Reed’s letter notes: “Such hucksterism appears to violate federal ethics rules, which bar federal employees from using their public office “for the endorsement of any product, service, or enterprise.”  Additionally, his statements also appear to violate federal conflict-of-interest laws prohibiting federal employees from using their public office to support their personal financial interests because Mr. Lutnick’s Wall Street firm, Cantor Fitzgerald, has exposures to Tesla approaching $1 billion.  According to Mr. Lutnick’s ethics agreement with the Commerce Department, he is obligated to divest his majority ownership stake in Cantor Fitzgerald within 90 days of taking office—by April 21.  Federal regulations require Mr. Lutnick to publicly certify once he has divested, and such a certification has not been posted to the OGE website. But even when Mr. Lutnick fully divests, his children, whom Mr. Lutnick has installed as senior executives of Cantor Fitzgerald, will benefit from movement in Telsa’s stock price prompted by Mr. Lutnick’s public pronouncements.”

    Secretary Lutnick did not appear to be going rogue when he made such an urgent and direct public call for viewers to purchase Tesla stock.  Lutnick’s appearance came in the wake of President Trump turning the White House lawn into a Tesla showroom and pledging to buy a Tesla.

    Since President Trump and Secretary Lutnick’s actions, Tesla stock prices have risen.

    Reed’s inquiry to the acting inspector general comes months after President Trump carried out a significant purge of inspectors general across multiple federal agencies.  On Friday, January 24, 2025, Trump fired independent inspector generals across most major federal departments, including the U.S. Department of Commerce.

    Full text of the letter follows:

    Mr. Roderick Anderson

    Acting Inspector General

    U.S. Department of Commerce

    1401 Constitution Avenue NW

    Washington, DC 20230

    Mr. Douglas A. Collins

    Acting Director

    U.S. Office of Government Ethics

    250 E Street SW

    Washington, DC 20024

    Dear Acting Inspector General Anderson and Acting Director Collins:

    I write to urge you to open an investigation into Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick for encouraging viewers to buy Tesla stock during an appearance on Fox News. 

    On March 19, Mr. Lutnick sat for an interview in his official capacity and told the American people, “If you want to learn something on this show tonight, it’s ‘buy Tesla.’ It’s unbelievable that [Elon Musk’s] stock is so cheap. It’ll never be this cheap again.”  He also predicted that each American would be buying “a Telsa robot, and anyone who doesn’t buy a Tesla robot is going to be silly.”

    Such hucksterism appears to violate federal ethics rules, which bar federal employees from using their public office “for the endorsement of any product, service, or enterprise.”  Additionally, his statements also appear to violate federal conflict-of-interest laws prohibiting federal employees from using their public office to support their personal financial interests because Mr. Lutnick’s Wall Street firm, Cantor Fitzgerald, has exposures to Tesla approaching $1 billion.  According to Mr. Lutnick’s ethics agreement with the Commerce Department, he is obligated to divest his majority ownership stake in Cantor Fitzgerald within 90 days of taking office—by April 21.  Federal regulations require Mr. Lutnick to publicly certify once he has divested, and such a certification has not been posted to the OGE website. But even when Mr. Lutnick fully divests, his children, whom Mr. Lutnick has installed as senior executives of Cantor Fitzgerald, will benefit from movement in Telsa’s stock price prompted by Mr. Lutnick’s public pronouncements.

    In light of these statements, I ask that you open an investigation into Mr. Lutnick’s compliance with Federal ethics rules and the laws prohibiting conflicts of interest.  To the extent permissible under the rules and regulations of your agencies, I also ask you publicly announce this investigation in order to discourage any potential violations of ethics rules by Mr. Lutnick or other members of the administration.  Thank you for your attention to his important matter.

    Sincerely,

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI China: 7.0-magnitude quake strikes sea areas near Papua New Guinea: CENC

    Source: China State Council Information Office

    A 7.0-magnitude earthquake struck sea areas near Papua New Guinea at 4:04 a.m. Saturday (Beijing Time), according to the China Earthquake Networks Center (CENC).

    The epicenter was monitored at 6.15 degrees south latitude and 151.65 degrees east longitude. The quake struck at a depth of 20 km, said a report issued by the CENC. 

    MIL OSI China News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Murphy: This Budget Is Just A Massive Transfer Of Wealth To The Ultra Wealthy

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Connecticut – Chris Murphy
    [embedded content]
    WASHINGTON—U.S. Senator Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) on Friday spoke on the U.S. Senate floor to oppose Republicans’ budget proposal, which will hand billionaires and corporations a massive tax cut paid for by slashing Medicaid, SNAP and other programs that millions of working American families rely on.
    “The budget we’re debating really comes down to one simple idea: the massive transfer of wealth and resources from the poor and the middle class to the ultra wealthy,” Murphy said. “What is being proposed in the Senate right now is stunning in its scope. This is the program that insures 24% of American families. One-quarter of Americans get their health insurance from Medicaid. You don’t know it as Medicaid because it’s called something different in each state. In Connecticut, it’s called HUSKY. In Wisconsin, it’s called BadgerCare. But in every state, about a quarter of the population gets their insurance through a Medicaid-funded program. Most of those folks are working full-time, but for one reason or another, that’s where they get their insurance. You’re talking about kicking millions of people off of that program, and for what? For what? To rack up the biggest bill ever on the credit card of the middle class – an explosion in debt – but also to fund a tax cut for the fabulously wealthy.”
    Murphy shared how Linda, a cancer survivor from Sherman, Connecticut, relies on Medicaid to maintain her health and keep working after losing her job and health insurance: “Linda lives in Sherman, Connecticut, a small town in western Connecticut. Following the economic downturn in 2008, Linda had trouble finding work. And that was tough for her, because she’s a cancer survivor. She had high health care expenses, and she needed work. She was underemployed. She worked in plant nurseries and agriculture. Her husband, at the same time, lost his job as an auto mechanic. They lost their health care insurance. But then, when the Affordable Care Act passed, Medicaid was expanded. More people were made eligible for Medicaid. And in 2010, she was able to sign up for Medicaid. She said, ‘I had so much anxiety all the time about how to pay for health care. We were going through all of our money, and we just thought, ‘this isn’t right. People shouldn’t have to worry about just being basically healthy.’ But once she got health care, she was able to restart her life. Linda went back to school, because now she had health care. She got a new degree. She found a job teaching agriculture at a local high school. But that program didn’t provide health care, so she still needed that Medicaid. Medicaid, she says, ‘just provides such a baseline for society. It allowed me to maintain my health so that I was able to continue working.’”
    He continued: “The Medicaid cuts that they are talking about will destroy Medicaid expansion. In fact, some states will automatically cancel the Medicaid expansion program when these cuts are made, meaning that people like Linda all across the country are going to lose their health care. For what? For a massive tax cut for the wealthy.”
    Murphy concluded: “What are we doing? Why are my colleagues choosing to destroy health care for millions of Americans in order to pass a tax cut that basically helps corporations and billionaires and millionaires? It is fundamentally immoral. And I have to believe – like in 2017, when Republicans were trying to destroy the Affordable Care Act, which insured 20 million Americans – that there are a handful of Republicans who know that this isn’t right. Who maybe aren’t ready to stop it today – tonight’s vote isn’t the final vote – but might be willing to stand up to this thievery before it’s too late. The people of this country–who are getting killed by higher prices that are coming because of the tariffs, and are going to be hurt by these Medicaid cuts, and are going to be furious when the rich become richer at their expense – they are counting on just a small handful of my Republican colleagues to realize right from wrong.”
    A full transcript of his remarks can be found below:
    MURPHY: “Thank you, Mr. President. The budget that we’re debating really comes down to one simple idea: the massive transfer of wealth and resources from the poor and the middle class to the ultra wealthy. 
    “What is being proposed in the Senate right now is stunning in its scope. You are talking about a piece of legislation that has such deep cuts to Medicaid – this is the program that insures 24% of American families. One-quarter of Americans get their health insurance from Medicaid. You don’t know it as Medicaid because it’s called something different in each state. In Connecticut, it’s called HUSKY. In Wisconsin, it’s called BadgerCare. But in every state, about a quarter of the population gets their insurance through a Medicaid-funded program. Most of those folks are working full-time, but for one reason or another, that’s where they get their insurance. 
    “You’re talking about kicking millions of people off of that program, and for what? For what? To rack up the biggest bill ever on the credit card of the middle class – an explosion in debt – but also to fund a tax cut for the fabulously wealthy. 
    “This is the 2017 tax cut, which is essentially going to be mirrored, we believe, by this tax cut. The top 1% of earners got tax cuttings 852 times bigger than working families in America. We don’t know the final shape of this tax cut, but it won’t look fundamentally different from that. 
    “This is a really bad time to be a working mom or dad in America. This week we are passing, apparently, a massive cut in health care benefits for working families in order to pad the pockets of the wealthy. But we are also dealing with the Trump tariff plan, which has been a keystone cop-like rollout that will ultimately raise prices for every single American. Tariffs can work as part of a coordinated, thoughtful approach to trying to rebuild American industry, but they only work when you partner those tariffs together with industrial policy, incentives to help promote the industry that you are trying to punish when the products come from abroad. 
    “I’m not reflexively opposed to the use of tariffs, but this use of tariffs is bananas. Because it is not paired with any domestic industrial policy, meaning that you’re just going to get the downside – the massive increase in costs for consumers – without the upside – job creation in the United States of America. 
    “And so before I get to the insult to middle-class families that will come through the budget, let’s just talk about what’s going to happen with these tariffs. We know how it’s going to work because we saw how tariffs worked in Trump’s first term. Let me just take one specific example.  
    “In Trump’s first term he imposed a 20% escalating tariff on washing machines and the idea was that we want washing machines to be made in the United States instead of outside the United States. But because he didn’t pair that together with any more comprehensive help for the washing machine industry in the United States, it was only downside. And it was only downside, not just because of the lack of a comprehensive policy but also because there were no checks on the corporations that saw the tariffs as a means to gouge consumers. You have to also partner tariffs together with some accountability for corporations, for the greedy corporations that get wide-eyed when they see the tariffs and realize that this is an opportunity to not just pass the tariff along but to jack up the price a little bit more and say that it was all because of the tariffs.
    “Here’s what happened on washing machines: You got a 20% escalating tariff. We have the data. We saw what happened. The economic data tells us that the washing machine companies passed along the 20% tariff and then padded the price increase, sometimes by 15%, sometimes by 50%. But it’s worse than that. The price increase was not just for imported washing machines. They also increased the price of the domestic washing machines that weren’t subject to the tariff. Why not? Why not? The Trump administration won’t hold us accountable for that. No one really looks to see whether the washing machine was made in America or not. We’ll just raise the price on everything. 
    “What do you buy when you buy a washing machine as well? A dryer. So guess what happened? Even though dryers weren’t subject to the tariff, the price got jacked up on the dryers as well. Dryers went up by fifteen percent sometimes in cost. Fifteen percent, twenty percent. 
    “All of a sudden, prices went up for everything. Now, Trump collected a bunch of money in tariffs. He made $80 billion. But that was literally just middle-class people paying the additional amount to the company and the company passing it along to the government. So it was just a tax. It was just a tax. 
    “Okay, maybe you could live with that if it revitalized the domestic washing machine industry. If there were tens of thousands of people going back to jobs in that industry. But that didn’t happen. I think there were one or two domestic washing machine factories that opened up and Trump, of course, made a big deal. You know how many jobs it was in total? Less than 2,000 jobs. Less than 2,000 jobs were created for a tariff that jacked up costs for every American and resulted in $80 billion of middle class taxes being collected by the government. That works out to about $800,000 per job. 
    “So that’s what’s coming, at scale. Not just on washing machines but on virtually every consumer product. A big price increase, little to no domestic job creation, all the pain on the middle class. Tariffs can work, but this is not the way that they work. 
    “And so this week, Senate Republicans, instead of trying to help consumers deal with the impact of these tariffs – I mean, we’re talking about huge price increases coming for American families. And this week we could be sitting here voting for bills that cancel the tariffs, or trying to help middle class families in another way. We’re doing exactly the opposite. Instead of helping families deal with the impact of the tariffs, instead of holding the greedy corporations in check as they ready to gouge consumers, we are debating a bill that would cut almost a trillion dollars out of Medicaid – the program that provides insurance for a quarter of Americans – that will result in raising health care costs for tens of millions of Americans, and we’re talking about giving a massive tax break to the billionaire CEOs of the companies that are going to be doing the price gouging, and to the companies themselves. 
    “That’s outrageous! That’s outrageous. If you are a regular, ordinary American, what you are being told is that you’re going to have to pay huge new price increases on everything you buy. You are going to have your health care disappear, and corporate profits and take-home pay for CEOs are going to skyrocket. 
    “Who’s asking for that? What American is asking for prices to go up, my health care to be cut and billionaires to get a big tax break? 
    “Let’s start talking about these tax cuts, okay? They’re the center of this bill. Everything in the Trump administration is about a simple story: how do I help my Mar-A-Lago billionaire friends? So this is the old tax cut, because we don’t know all the details of the new one. If you look at the poorest Americans versus the richest Americans, the tax cut is 852 times bigger. 
    “But here’s a back-of-the-napkin analysis of what this new tax cut is likely to look like if it’s basically formed like the old one. And instead of taking the poorest Americans versus the richest Americans, instead let’s just look at sort of the bottom 60% of income earners in this country. That’s roughly about everybody who makes $90,000 or less. So that’s a lot of your neighbors, right? I mean, $90,000 is an income that is familiar to a lot of Americans. 
    “So under this new tax cut, if it looks like the old one, and that’s the signal that we get, households in the top one percent are going to get an average tax cut that’s 120 times bigger than the tax cut given to people who are making $90,000 or less. So that’s 152 times bigger than the very poor. But let’s take somebody who’s making $60,000. The richest 1% are going to get a tax cut that is 120 times bigger. How is that fair? 
    “Okay, now you’d say, that’s because they make a lot more money. So of course they’re going to get a bigger tax cut. But let’s do the math in a different way. As a share of after-tax income, the tax cuts at the top are still more than triple the total value of the tax cut received for people with incomes in the bottom 60%. So even when you adjust for the fact that they are making more money, they are still getting a tax cut whose value is three times bigger than folks who are making a middle income in this country. And why? I mean, does anybody believe in trickle-down economics anymore? It has been completely discredited. 
    “And, again, we have the 2017 tax cuts as evidence. Donald Trump trotted out a big promise. He said these tax cuts for corporations and billionaires and millionaires, they’ll trickle down to everybody else, and I’ll tell you the number: the average worker will get a $4,000 salary increase.That was the promise. The money will trickle down. The corporations will be so generous. So generous. They’ll take their giant tax cut – bigger than they even asked for. Senator Whitehouse just showed you the chart where corporations have gone from providing 30% of American tax revenue down to 10% of American tax revenue. What a great deal for corporations. Okay! That’s a nice chart, that makes sense if the corporations are taking their lower tax liability and turning it around to wages.
    But instead, they’re not. They’re keeping it for themselves. For their executives, for their top shareholders. The analysis shows that that promised $4,000 salary increase as a result of the tax cuts wasn’t $4,000. It wasn’t $2000, it wasn’t $1000, it wasn’t $100. It was zero. Because all of that money – virtually all of that money – ended up getting gobbled up by the corporations, mainly for stock buybacks. It didn’t go to increase compensation for their employees.
    “So it’s not to raise wages. I guess it’s just to make rich people richer. From 2017, when that tax cut passed, that first Trump tax cut passed, until 2023, Elon Musk’s wealth grew by 1,222%. I don’t even know what that looks like. Jeff Bezos’s grew by 96%, Zuckerberg’s by 50%, Rupert Murdoch’s by 50%. I use those names because those were the billionaires that were at Trump’s inauguration cheerleading him into office because they know that another big tax cut for their company and for them personally is coming. 
    “Now, I will admit to you, median income overall grew from 2017 to 2023. So everybody in the country was making more in 2023 than they were making in 2017. But median income was not growing by 50%, 96%, or 1,222%. 
    “So this is a massive tax cut, the vast majority of it going to the very, very wealthiest. But what makes this even harder to understand is what Senator Whitehouse laid out for you. 
    “Most of this is just going on your credit card. Most of this is just being borrowed, and that has a consequence: the national debt potentially doubling as a result of this massive tax cut for the very, very wealthy. And it’s just so heartbreaking, the hypocrisy. I mean I could string together a 24-hour long video of my Republican colleagues talking ad nauseam about ‘the danger of debt,’ ‘the rising deficit.’ ‘We can’t spend money on kids.’ ‘We can’t spend money on climate.’ ‘We can’t spend money on schools.’ ‘We can’t help people go to college.’ ‘No, no, no, we can’t do any of that, we can’t do anything of that, because the debt– the deficit.’ 
    “And yet when it comes to a billionaire tax cut, a corporate tax cut, we’re going to potentially double the debt? Nobody is caring about the debt. In fact, they’re rigging the rules of the Senate–they’re breaking the rules of the Senate–just so they can get away with a massive increase in debt and deficit. 
    “But somewhere along the line they said, well, you know what? We can’t borrow the whole thing. We’ve got to make it look like we’re cutting some spending. So let’s cut some spending to make it at least look like it’s not all borrowed. But let’s make sure that the spending we’re cutting only hurts poor people and the middle class, because God forbid we can cut spending that helps the rich or the affluent. God forbid we take away some of the tax breaks that help them. 
    “And so where are the cuts coming? Medicaid. 80% of the cuts are Medicaid. $880 billion in a House bill, similar amount, cutting Medicaid. Medicaid, as I said, is the program that insures 24% of Americans. At least two-thirds of those are working, working full time. They just don’t have health insurance through their employer, so they have to get it through Medicaid. 
    “And so when Republicans decided that they couldn’t borrow the whole thing, like we’ll double the national debt but we’re not going to triple the national debt, they targeted the cuts to hurt the middle class and poor people. 
    “And so I just want to end by telling you what this means in real time. I don’t actually know what it means to give billionaires another $50,000 in tax breaks. I really don’t know what that means. I don’t know what that life is like. I don’t know what it’s like to have seven houses and four yachts. I don’t know what a billionaire does with an extra $50,000. I can’t actually explain that to you. I don’t understand that kind of rapacious greed. 
    “What I do know is what happens to poor people–the people who live in my neighborhood, in the south end of Hartford–when they lose their Medicaid. Linda lives in Sherman, Connecticut, a small town in western Connecticut. Following the economic downturn in 2008, Linda had trouble finding work. And that was tough for her, because she’s a cancer survivor. She had high health care expenses, and she needed work. She was underemployed. She worked in plant nurseries and agriculture. Her husband, at the same time, lost his job as an auto mechanic. They lost their health care insurance. But then, when the Affordable Care Act passed, Medicaid was expanded. More people were made eligible for Medicaid. And in 2010, she was able to sign up for Medicaid. She said, ‘I had so much anxiety all the time about how to pay for health care. We were going through all of our money, and we just thought, “this isn’t right. People shouldn’t have to worry about just being basically healthy.”’ But once she got health care, she was able to restart her life. Linda went back to school, because now she had health care. She got a new degree. She found a job teaching agriculture at a local high school. But that program didn’t provide health care, so she still needed that Medicaid. Medicaid, she says, ‘just provides such a baseline for society. It allowed me to maintain my health so that I was able to continue working.’ 
    “The Medicaid cuts that they are talking about will destroy Medicaid expansion. In fact, some states will automatically cancel the Medicaid expansion program when these cuts are made, meaning that people like Linda all across the country are going to lose their health care. For what? For a massive tax cut for the wealthy. 
    “Emily Grenelli is a worker at one of Connecticut’s biggest behavioral health and substance abuse providers. So every day, she’s talking to people who rely on Medicaid so that they can get help for their mental health disorder or their substance abuse disorder. Let’s be honest: we all have somebody in our life who has a serious mental illness or has struggled with substance abuse. So you know these people. She wrote me a letter talking about the fact that the conversations in their therapy groups in the last month have fundamentally changed. They’re actually not doing therapy any longer for mental illness or for substance abuse. They are now doing therapy for the anxiety all these people have, knowing they’re about to lose their health insurance. 
    “One case manager told me, she writes, that she was working with a client to find housing and the client now just wants to stop looking, because she feels like there is no point, because she’s going to lose her Medicaid. Republicans are going to strip her Medicaid from her. She won’t be able to get her medication and services. She feels hopeless. The clinician told me about an hour-long session she had the day before. 75% of it was focused on the client’s fear of losing her benefits and what that would mean for her and all the other clients. She shared with me that if there was a way for her to leave the country right now, she would. At this provider, 35% of their clients would likely lose access to mental illness and substance abuse services if these cuts go through.
    “What are we doing? Why are we doing this? Why are we choosing, why are my colleagues choosing to destroy health care for millions of Americans in order to pass a tax cut that basically helps corporations and billionaires and millionaires? It is fundamentally immoral. And I have to believe – like in 2017, when Republicans were trying to destroy the Affordable Care Act, which insured 20 million Americans – that there are a handful of Republicans who know that this isn’t right. Who maybe aren’t ready to stop it today – tonight’s vote isn’t the final vote – but might be willing to stand up to this thievery before it’s too late. 
    “The people of this country–who are getting killed by higher prices that are coming because of the tariffs, and are going to be hurt by these Medicaid cuts, and are going to be furious when the rich become richer at their expense – they are counting on just a small handful of my Republican colleagues to realize right from wrong. 
    “I yield the floor.”

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: To Improve Republican Budget Resolution, Shaheen Offers Dozens of Amendments that Would Lower Health Care Costs, Shield Families and Businesses from Rising Prices, Keep Americans Safe and Secure

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for New Hampshire Jeanne Shaheen

    (Washington, DC) – U.S. Senator Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH), a top member of the U.S. Senate Appropriations and Armed Services Committees and Ranking Member of the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee, will offer dozens of amendments to the budget resolution tonight that would make health care more affordable, lower the costs of energy bills, protect American consumers and businesses from rising prices imposed by President Trump’s tariffs and keep Americans safe by enhancing military preparedness, strengthening our air traffic controller workforce, cracking down on drugs and investing in the northern border. 

    “Let’s be very clear: Tonight’s budget resolution process is all about slashing critical services and raising costs on families to free up dollars for tax cuts to the wealthiest in the country. Meanwhile, I’m offering opportunities for bipartisan collaboration to deliver commonsense solutions for Americans grappling with high costs,” said Shaheen. “Americans want, expect and deserve their elected representatives to work together to make progress on the issues they’re facing – and partisan exercises like this do nothing to make their lives better. I’m working to cut through Washington dysfunction and advocate for Granite Staters.” 

    Below is an overview of the dozens of amendments Senator Shaheen is introducing for consideration tonight. 

    To help lower everyday costs, Shaheen introduced amendments that would: 

    • Protect Americans from a national sales tax that raises costs on clothing, toys, electronics and energy. 
    • Help families struggling with high grocery bills by restoring cancelled federal food assistance programs. 
    • Support American jobs and manufacturers hurt by Trump’s tariffs. 
    • Enhance housing affordability by preventing construction cost increases due to tariffs and delays and expanding investment in housing development. 
    • Help households afford groceries, including preventing broad tariffs which would raise the price of food or cuts to food aid for families. 
    • Prevent funding cuts to child care or early childhood education programs helping New Hampshire families. 
    • Support affordable housing in disaster recovery by rebuilding with resilient and cost-effective methods, especially those that lower home insurance rates. 
    • Lower sugar prices for American businesses and consumers harmed by the U.S. sugar program. 

    To help make health care more affordable and accessible, Shaheen introduced amendments that would: 

    • Prioritize Affordable Care Act tax credits that give 22 million Americans access to affordable, quality health insurance. 
    • Ensure that Medicaid expansion programs aren’t eliminated by drastic cuts to federal funding, including New Hampshire’s Granite Advantage covering more than 60,000 Granite Staters. 
    • Ensure that patients suffering from diabetes do not face unnecessary barriers to care, including access to $35 insulin. 
    • Ensure hospitals and doctors working in rural areas can keep their doors open and continue providing lifesaving care for their patients. 
    • Ensure that our community health centers can continue to provide vital care to their patients. 

    To help enhance public safety and keep families secure, Shaheen introduced amendments that would: 

    • Make investments in the Air Traffic Controller workforce and overturning the reckless firing of hundreds of Federal Aviation Administration personnel critical to aviation safety. 
    • Support her Cooper Davis Act and limit illegal drug sales on social media. 
    • Improve cell service and communications for emergency services along the northern border. 
    • Ensure that DHS has the technology needed to monitor and defend the U.S.-Canada border against the flow of drugs and illegal migration. 
    • Raise pay for U.S. Bureau of Prisons correctional officers in New Hampshire and across the country. 
    • Preserve funding for programs that support survivors of sexual and domestic violence. 
    • Ensure local law enforcement agencies and communities are not left with the bill for unfunded federal mandates. 
    • Prioritize the deportation of undocumented individuals who pose threats to our national security or public safety. 
    • Ensure that increased funding for the DOJ and DHS is focused on stopping the flow of illegal drugs into the United States. 
    • Restore retention incentives and union protections for federal correctional officers and staff, including those at FCI Berlin. 

    To help lower American households’ energy costs, Shaheen introduced amendments that would: 

    • Protect Americans from higher energy costs for gas, heating oil and propane due to broad tariffs. 
    • Protect bipartisan investments that lower energy costs, promote electric grid reliability and improve drinking water and wastewater infrastructure, including addressing PFAS contamination. 
    • Protect families, farmers and businesses from higher energy costs by ensuring energy saving and renewable energy projects funded by Congress continue. 
    • Prevent Congress from blocking state or local governments from updating their building codes to protect life and property, reduce losses from disasters or lower energy costs for families. 
    • Support energy efficient building construction and retrofits to lower energy costs and enhance electric grid reliability. 
    • Support resources that help make home heating more affordable, including energy assistance from the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP) and weatherization. 

    To help bolster America’s national security and support American service members and their families, Shaheen introduced amendments that would: 

    • Support military service members, veterans and families, including by protecting family members who were recently fired from federal employment solely because they were new to a job. 
    • Replenish the defense industrial base ramping up to support Ukraine. 
    • Replenish the defense industrial base ramping up to support the defense of Taiwan. 
    • Ensure that federal employees essential to national security are not impacted by federal hiring freezes or reduction in force (RIF) initiatives. 
    • Require oversight over wasteful spending. 
    • Protect DoD’s policy that ensures service women receive the same coverage for contraception as civilian women. 
    • Ensure that U.S. farmers do not suffer economic harm due to the freeze on U.S. assistance. 
    • Call on the Administration to use the REPO Act authorities to seize Russian assets and support Ukraine. 

    Additional amendments introduced by Shaheen would: 

    • Prevent a reduction in postal service for rural America, including by preventing closure of processing centers. 
    • Ensure that Americans are protected against fraud, price gouging and higher rental and housing prices caused by illegal price information sharing. 
    • Support funding to assist Afghan SIVs and refugee resettlement. 
    • Cut more than $40 billion in wasteful agriculture spending going to large corporate farm operations while preserving benefits to small family farms. 
    • Ensure strong funding for the Northern Border Regional Commission. 
    • Prevent adding $5 trillion of tax cuts to the national debt and raising interest rates when the Federal Government is already paying $1 trillion per year in interest. 
    • Support American farmers and address world hunger. 
    • Address corruption and conflicts of interest from Special Government Employees like Elon Musk by prohibiting them from receiving federal contracts while they’re working for the government. 

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Rosen, Curtis Bipartisan Bill to Counter Hezbollah’s Influence in the Western Hemisphere Passes Committee

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator Jacky Rosen (D-NV)

    WASHINGTON, DC — U.S. Senator Jacky Rosen (D-NV), Ranking Member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee’s Near East Subcommittee, announced that her bipartisan bill with Senator John Curtis (R-UT) to direct the U.S. Department of State and other federal agencies to assess and counter Hezbollah’s influence in Latin America advanced in committee. The No Hezbollah in Our Hemisphere Act requires an official determination of whether any Western Hemisphere country meets the legal definition of a terrorist sanctuary and imposes restrictions on officials who support Hezbollah.
    “Iran-backed Hezbollah is a terrorist organization that’s intent on targeting the United States and our allies, like Israel,” said Senator Rosen. “This terrorist group has operated in the Western Hemisphere for decades to raise funds for their illicit activities, which is a threat to our national security. I’m glad that my bipartisan bill to prevent Hezbollah from continuing to operate in this hemisphere has advanced through committee.”
    Hezbollah, with direct support from Iran, has built an extensive network in Latin America, using the region as a hub for terrorism, illicit financing, and organized crime. The group plays a central role in the cocaine trade, collaborating with Colombian and Mexican cartels to smuggle multi-ton shipments of narcotics across the hemisphere.
    While countries such as Argentina and Paraguay have designated Hezbollah as a terrorist organization, many others have not—allowing the group to operate with impunity. Some authoritarian regimes in Latin America, particularly Venezuela under Nicolás Maduro, openly support Hezbollah and its Iranian backers. Brazil, Iran’s primary trading partner in the region, has even allowed Iranian warships to dock in Rio de Janeiro.
    Following the October 7, 2023 terrorist attacks in Israel, authorities in Brazil and Argentina intercepted multiple Iranian-backed terrorist plots targeting Jewish communities. The lack of coordinated regional action against Hezbollah poses a direct security threat to the United States and its allies.
    Senator Rosen continues to fight to protect the United States and our allies against terrorist organizations. Last Congress, she introduced a bipartisan resolution urging the European Union (EU) to fully designate Hezbollah as a terrorist organization. Senator Rosen also introduced the bipartisan No Immigration Benefits for Hamas Terrorists Act to prevent any person who participated in Hamas’s October 7 terrorist attacks from entering the United States.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI China: California aims to forge its own path in global trade amid US tariffs

    Source: China State Council Information Office

    California Governor Gavin Newsom announced a bold initiative on Friday to shield the state’s economy from the impacts of the U.S. tariff policies by pursuing independent trade relationships with international partners.

    “Donald Trump’s tariffs do not represent all Americans,” Newsom said in a video message. “California remains a stable trading partner,” he said, directing his administration to pursue new trade opportunities globally.

    The move came just two days after U.S. President Donald Trump announced sweeping tariffs, including a 10-percent “minimum baseline tariff” on all imports, with higher rates for certain trading partners, effective on April 5.

    The new tariffs have drawn backlash from economies around the world, with countermeasures already pledged by some. Newsom urged the state’s “long-standing trade partners” to exempt California-made products from any retaliatory measures.

    “California leads the nation as the #1 state for agriculture and manufacturing — and it’s our workers, families, and farmers who stand to lose the most from this Trump tax hike and trade war,” said the governor in a statement.

    “To our international partners: As the fifth largest economy in the world, the Golden State will remain a steady, reliable partner for generations to come, no matter the turbulence coming out of Washington. California is not Washington, D.C.”

    With a gross domestic product of 3.9 trillion U.S. dollars, California is the largest importer among all U.S. states, with more than 675 billion dollars in two-way trade supporting millions of jobs across the state. Its economy is 50 percent bigger than the GDP of the nation’s next largest state, Texas, according to the governor’s office.

    The initiative directed the state administration to identify collaborative opportunities with trading partners that protect California’s economic interests, including workers, manufacturers and businesses, as well as broader supply chains linked to the state’s economy.

    The tariffs announced by the Trump administration could result in a 2.3 percent increase in overall inflation in the United States this year, including a 2.8 percent increase in food prices and an 8.4 percent increase in automotive prices. The tariffs’ impact could cost the average household 3,800 dollars a year, according to analysis by the Budget Lab at Yale University.

    Newsom is particularly concerned about the state’s agricultural sector. California produces about 80 percent of the world’s almonds, generating an industry worth approximately 5.6 billion dollars and supporting more than 100,000 jobs.

    The almond industry alone contributes about 11 billion dollars in added value to California’s economy, according to industry data. About 70 percent of the state’s almond crop is exported to more than 100 economies worldwide.

    Beyond agriculture, Newsom’s administration was concerned about disruptions to the state’s manufacturing sector. Manufactured goods dominate both California’s exports (87 percent) and imports (89 percent), making the state particularly vulnerable to tariff impacts.

    The Port of Los Angeles, a major trade hub, anticipates a possible 10 percent decrease in cargo volume due to the tariffs, which could result in job losses in the port and related industries.

    The governor’s initiative also aimed to safeguard access to critical construction materials needed for recovery efforts following the recent Los Angeles wildfires. Officials noted that current tariffs on Canadian lumber of 14 percent could rise to nearly 27 percent, hampering rebuilding efforts.

    State officials also expressed concern about supply chains between California and Baja, Mexico. They argued that taxing component goods each time they cross the border will raise final product prices for Californians.

    Moreover, the Sacramento Bee reported Friday that Newsom faced another serious question: “How much of a problem will tariffs be for the state’s economy, which is heavily reliant upon high-income earners, many of whom draw their wealth from stocks.”

    The UCLA Anderson Forecast issued a recession watch last month, citing tariffs as one factor in a possible downturn. But there are others, notably Trump’s crackdown on undocumented immigrants, which the Forecast saw as having the potential for reducing the labor pool in the state.

    Though legal experts noted that individual states do not have the constitutional authority to independently negotiate global trading deals regarding tariffs, as this power is reserved for the federal government, California has been cultivating relationships with foreign governments and officials independent of the current federal administration.

    California has a history of active engagement in international trade through various agreements and initiatives. It has entered into 38 international agreements with 28 different foreign partners, according to the governor’s office.

    The state government has established the International Affairs and Trade Development Interagency Committee, which advises Newsom on international trade matters and coordinates related state activities, and California maintains trade and investment desks in key markets to further its international economic objectives. 

    MIL OSI China News

  • MIL-OSI China: Senate Commerce Committee chair warns of major risks for US economy, Republicans due to Trump’s tariffs

    Source: China State Council Information Office

    Ted Cruz, chairman of the U.S. Senate Commerce Committee and a veteran Republican from Texas, warned on Friday that if countries and regions around the world respond with reciprocal tariffs while President Donald Trump’s tariffs remain in place, that could be “terrible for America” and result in dramatic tax hike in a “long, long time.”

    Though describing himself as Trump’s “strongest supporter” in the U.S. Senate, Cruz said he is “not a fan” of tariffs.

    If countries and regions around the world cave to Trump’s moves, that could be “great,” said Cruz, but “if we’re in a scenario 30 days from now, 60 days from now, 90 days from now, with massive American tariffs, and massive tariffs on American goods in every other country on earth, that is a terrible outcome.”

    He said he spoke on Thursday night to one of the “Big Three” U.S. automakers, namely GM, Ford and Chrysler, who said that the tariffs could raise average prices of their cars by 4,500 U.S. dollars from as early as June due to a lag in the supply chain.

    “This U.S. car company told me they actually thought foreign car companies would benefit more than they would, because if you send it over here, you pay one tariff, whereas these guys are getting hit on each part that is going over,” said the senator.

    “If we go into a recession, particularly a bad recession, 2026 in all likelihood, politically would be a bloodbath,” he said of the Republicans’ race in the 2026 midterm elections.

    Some Republicans are now signaling interest in legislation to enhance Congress’ authority to approve future tariffs, according to a report from The Politico. 

    MIL OSI China News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Amo Hosts District Town Hall on Defending Rhode Island Values and Pushing Back on Trump Administration

    Source: US Congressman Gabe Amo (Rhode Island 1st District)

    At Riverside Middle School, Congressman Amo led discussion of top priorities with First Congressional District constituents

    RIVERSIDE, RI – Last night, Congressman Gabe Amo (RI-01) held a district town hall to answer questions from Rhode Islanders in the First Congressional District and outline his plans to combat the chaos and confusion of the Trump administration. Over the course of more than 2 hours, Congressman Amo was joined by Attorney General Peter Neronha to discuss how he is defending Rhode Island values through legislationlitigationcommunication, and agitation

    Topics raised by Rhode Islanders included President Donald Trump’s illegal federal funding freeze, efforts to eliminate federal agencies, and steps Congressman Amo is taking to hold the Trump administration accountable and protect Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid from Republican cuts to pay for tax breaks for billionaires.

    “Whether it’s Trump’s illegal federal funding freeze, his disastrous tariff proposals, or DOGE and Elon Musk shutting down federal agencies, residents in Rhode Island’s First Congressional District are understandably worried,” said Congressman Amo. “I organized this district town hall with Attorney General Neronha to hear concerns, answer questions, and talk about our concrete plans to respond. We need to think globally and act locally — and last night we did just that.”

    “Since day one, this President and his Administration have used fear tactics, intimidation, and chaos to try and subvert the rule of law and consolidate power through a number of unconstitutional executive actions,” said Attorney General Neronha. “Just yesterday, my Office secured another victory against one of these actions, because we are on the right side of the law. In order to protect our democracy and the rights of Americans everywhere, we need to boldly counter this behavior by asking questions, demanding answers, and acting accordingly. Last night, Rhode Islanders did just that, and I thank Congressman Amo for organizing this opportunity.” 

    “I would like to thank Congressman Gabe Amo for choosing East Providence to host this important nonpartisan town hall meeting,” Mayor Bob DaSilva said. “Any opportunity to hear directly from our neighbors is important to helping push the needle forward to creating a brighter future for both our state and community.”

    Photos of the event can be downloaded here.

    BACKGROUND
    Since the start of President Trump’s administration, Congressman Amo has been laser focused on opposing dangerous executive orders, illegal federal funding freezes, harmful efforts to shut down federal agencies, and the elimination of basic protections for immigrants and our LGBTQ neighbors. 

    In the last 73 days, Congressman Amo:

    In addition to these actions, Congressman Amo has sent letters to:

    Congressman Amo has also set up a link on his website for Rhode Islanders who’d like to share their story about how the Trump administration is affecting them:

     

    https://amo.house.gov/shareyourstory

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Senator Murray Statement on Republicans’ Bill to Blow Up National Debt, Shower Billionaires With Tax Breaks, Slash Medicaid

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Washington State Patty Murray

    Washington, D.C. – Today, U.S. Senator Patty Murray (D-WA), Vice Chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee and a senior member and former chair of the Senate Budget Committee, issued the following statement regarding the ongoing debate and consideration of Senate Republicans’ modified budget resolution.

    “I take my votes on the Senate floor very seriously. While, tonight, I needed to be with my husband while he receives care at the hospital—I am in close touch with my colleagues and I am ready to return to the floor at a moment’s notice if any vote should hinge on my attendance. I strongly oppose Republicans’ pro-billionaire, anti-middle-class budget blueprint, and I will continue to fight this legislation every step of the way as Republicans draft a final bill for consideration.

    “Let me be clear about the path Republicans have chosen to go down: they are going to light more than $5 trillion on fire—not to protect Social Security or make child care more affordable, but to shower billionaires with tax cuts they don’t need, pushing our country into an unprecedented level of debt. And in a move that shows they truly must think the American people aren’t watching, Republicans are trying to use magic math to pretend trillions of dollars in tax cuts for billionaires cost nothing. Budgets aren’t magic—they’re math, and even my former preschool students would know the difference between zero and a trillion.

    “No billionaire left behind—that is the Republican agenda. The message Republicans are sending folks back home is that there is always more money for billionaires, but it’s tough times for everyone else—which means kicking kids off Medicaid and choking off cancer research.

    “No one is asking Congress to pass a bill that slashes Medicaid and closes hospitals just so Elon Musk can line his pockets with a big tax break; instead, we should be working together to reverse Trump’s tariff taxes on everyday goods.

    “Make no mistake, as Trump runs our economy into the ground, Republicans are handing money to billionaires hand over fist, while raising prices—raising taxes—on virtually every working American. Republicans are cheering Trump as he drives America towards a painful recession—but Democrats are fighting back to stop them. At every turn, I will keep fighting to protect Medicaid, Social Security, and the programs that help families and keep us all safe. I will keep fighting to bring economic sanity back to this country and make government work better for working people—and I will continue to strongly oppose Republicans’ pro-billionaire, pro-recession agenda.”

    The budget blueprint Senate Republicans unveiled this week sets Republicans up to dole out more than $5.3 trillion in new tax cuts that will disproportionately benefit billionaires, the ultra-rich, and largest corporations. But to help allow themselves to make the tax cuts permanent without making even more devastating cuts to, for example, Americans’ health care under the Senate’s strict budget reconciliation rules, Republicans want to use a gimmick known as “current policy baseline” to pretend that extending $3.8 trillion in tax cuts won’t cost the country a cent—and to try to make them permanent in clear violation of the longstanding Byrd rule that enforces reconciliation in the Senate. The budget resolution also sets Republicans up to make massive cuts to Medicaid, nutrition assistance, and other critical domestic programs.

    Today, budget experts from across the political spectrum wrote in part, “Using fabricated scorekeeping renders much of the Congressional Budget Act pointless and acts to evade responsibility for the resulting bottom line numbers. Congress cannot budget responsibly if it refuses to ever consider what policies actually cost. There is no point of budget enforcement if Congress gets to pick the score it wants.”

    The nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget issued a new report today that made plain Republicans’ budget resolution would enable unprecedented deficit increases. It would:

    • Equal more than all spending programs except for the Social Security retirement program, Medicare, Medicaid, and defense.
    • Add as much to deficits as the American Rescue Plan, Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, CARES Act, and bipartisan infrastructure law combined, including more than three times as much as the American Rescue Plan and over 14 times as much as the bipartisan infrastructure law.
    • Cost as much or more than a large social welfare program, specifically five times as much as all Affordable Care Act health insurance subsidies, 4.5 times as much as Medicare Part D, three times as much as the Social Security Disability Insurance program, and more than three-quarters of all federal Medicaid spending.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-Evening Report: Consumers are boycotting US goods around the world. Should Trump be worried?

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Alan Bradshaw, Professor of Marketing, Royal Holloway University of London

    US alcohol has been removed from sale in the Canadian province of British Columbia. lenic/Shutterstock

    As politicians around the world scramble to respond to US “liberation day” tariffs, consumers have also begun flexing their muscles. “Boycott USA” messages and searches have been trending on social media and search engines, with users sharing advice on brands and products to avoid.

    Even before Donald Trump announced across-the-board tariffs, there had been protests and attacks on the president’s golf courses in Doonbeg in Ireland and Turnberry in Scotland in response to other policies. And in Canada, shoppers avoided US goods after Trump announced he could take over his northern neighbour.

    His close ally Elon Musk has seen protests at Tesla showrooms across Europe, Australia and New Zealand. New cars have been set on fire as part of the “Tesla take-down”, while Tesla sales have been on a deep downward trend. This has been especially noticeable in European countries where electric vehicles sales have been high, and in Australia.

    This targeting of Trump and Musk’s brands are part of wider boycotts of US goods as consumers look for ways to express their anger at the US administration.

    Denmark’s biggest retailer, Salling Group, has given the price label of all European products a black star, making it easy for customers to avoid US goods.

    Canadian shoppers are turning US products upside down in retail outlets so it’s easier for fellow shoppers to spot and avoid them. Canadian consumers can also download the Maple Scan app that checks barcodes to see if their grocery purchases are actually Canadian or have parent companies from the USA.

    Who owns what?

    The issue of ostensibly Canadian brands being owned by US capital illustrates the complexity of consumer boycotts – it can be difficult to identify which brands are American and which are not.

    In the UK, for example, many consumers would be surprised to learn how many famous British brands are actually American-owned – for example, Cadbury, Waterstones and Boots. So entwined are global economies that attempts by consumers to boycott US brands may also damage their local economies.

    This complexity is also present in Danish and Canadian Facebook groups that are dedicated to boycotting US goods. Consumers exchange tips on how to swap alternatives for American products.

    The fact that Facebook is a US-based company only demonstrates how deeply embedded consumer culture is in US technologies. European businesses often depend on American operating systems and cloud storage while consumers rely on US-owned social media platforms for communication.

    Even when consumers succeed in weeding out American products, if they pay using Visa, Mastercard or Apple Pay, a percentage of the price will nonetheless be rerouted to the US. If a touch payment is made with Worldpay, the percentage could be even greater.

    These American financial services show just how embedded US businesses are in retail in ways that consumers may not appreciate. In practice, an absolute boycott of US business is almost unimaginable.

    All-American brands

    But American branding is not always subtle. In addition to brands directly connected to the US administration – such as the Trump golf courses and Tesla – many other companies have always been flamboyantly American. Coca-Cola, Starbucks and Budweiser are just some examples where their American identities and proudly on show.

    As such, it’s possible that consumers will increasingly avoid blatantly American brands. They may be less concerned about the complexities and contradictions of a more comprehensive boycott.

    Consumer actions where the goal is political change are known as “proxy boycotts” because no particular company is the ultimate target. Rather, the brands and firms are targeted by consumers as a means to an end.

    Do boycotts work?

    A classic example of a proxy boycott took aim at French goods, particularly wine, in the mid-1990s. This was in response to president Jacques Chirac’s decision to conduct nuclear tests in the Pacific. The large-scale consumer boycotts contributed to France’s decision to abandon its nuclear tests in 1996.

    In Britain, for example, French wines in all categories lost market share as demand fell during the boycott. At the time, it cost the French wine sector £23 million (about £46 million today).

    These boycotts are a reminder that the interplay between corporations, brands and consumer culture are inevitably embedded in politics. The current political impasse demonstrates that consumers can participate in politics, not just with their votes, but also with their buying power.

    Trump clearly wants to demonstrate American strength. The “liberation day” tariffs, which were higher than most observers expected, bear this out. But many US corporations will now be worrying about how consumers in the US and around the world might respond. Trump could see a mass mobilisation of consumer power in ways that will give the president something to think about.

    The authors do not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and have disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. Consumers are boycotting US goods around the world. Should Trump be worried? – https://theconversation.com/consumers-are-boycotting-us-goods-around-the-world-should-trump-be-worried-253389

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-OSI USA: PREPARED REMARKS: Sanders Speech on Trump’s Bad, Backwards Budget

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Vermont – Bernie Sanders

    WASHINGTON, April 4 – Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) today gave remarks on the floor of the Senate calling out Trump’s absurd budget that guts programs working class families rely on to pay for tax cuts for the rich.

    Sanders’ remarks, as prepared for delivery, are below and can be watched HERE:

    Let me say a few words about where we are as a nation, what this Budget Resolution does and why I am strongly opposed to it.

    M. President, we have more income and wealth inequality in our country today than we have ever had in the history of America.

    Three people on top own more wealth than the bottom half of American society. The top one percent owns more wealth than the bottom 90 percent. CEOs now make about 300 times more than their workers. In other words, the very rich are becoming much richer and working families are struggling. 

    So what does this Budget Resolution do to address this very serious crisis? Does it help working people? Does it help low income people? No.  

    It actually makes income and wealth inequality much worse by providing massive tax breaks to the billionaires and the richest people in this country, driving up the national debt, and making those on top very, very happy.  

    M. President, in America today, we have 60 percent of our people living paycheck to paycheck, struggling every week to put food on the table, to pay the rent, to deal with child care, to take care of their health care. 

    M. President, real wages for the average American worker have been stagnant for the last 50 years despite a huge increase in worker productivity. And today, all across this country, you have workers working for $11, $12, $13 an hour – working for starvation wages. Some of them are actually sleeping in their cars.

    Now, how does this Budget Resolution address the crises facing working families?

    Well, at a time when many workers are struggling to find affordable housing, what this budget will do is cut back on housing programs, making it harder for working people to get decent housing. It will cut funding for low income and affordable housing. It makes life more difficult for millions of working families.

    M. President, at a time when 22 percent of our seniors are trying to survive on less than $15,000 a year – and that’s really quite shocking. It’s something we don’t talk about. It’s something that we don’t deal with here in Congress. Can you imagine a senior citizen trying to survive on $15,000 a year when seniors need additional health care, when seniors need to keep their homes warmer. So how does this budget help seniors? What does it do for seniors?

    Well, it makes a bad situation much worse. This legislation will make it much harder for seniors to receive the care they desperately need in nursing homes. 

    In Vermont, we have a major nursing home crisis. Nursing homes are shutting down and it’s harder for people to get into nursing homes. Well, when you cut Medicaid by $880 billion, you’re going to make it much harder for seniors to access nursing homes because two out of three seniors are dependent upon Medicaid to get into nursing homes. This legislation would also cut back on nutrition programs for seniors at a time when many seniors are having a hard time affording the food that they need.

    And maybe worst of all, at a moment when Mr. Musk and his billionaire friends are laying off thousands of workers at the Social Security Administration, closing down Social Security offices all over the country, and making it harder for people with disabilities and older people to get the benefits that they have paid into for their whole lives, this bill does nothing to address that crisis.

    M. President, we right now, embarrassingly, have the highest rate of childhood poverty of almost any major country on Earth. It’s a little bit embarrassing: We’re the richest country on the face of the Earth, we have more income and wealth inequality than any other country, we’re seeing a significant growth in the number of billionaires we have. But in terms of our kids, we have the highest rate of childhood poverty of almost any major nation.

    Now, how would this budget impact our children?

    Well, it would make a bad situation even worse by throwing millions of children off of the health care they have. That’s what happens when you cut Medicaid by hundreds and hundreds of billions of dollars.

    This budget would cut nutrition programs that one out of every five children depend upon. Amazingly – sadly – in America, a lot of kids go to school hungry. And this legislation would cut nutrition programs. Furthermore for working families, this legislation would do nothing to address the outrageously high cost of child care in America.

    And, by the way, it would make devastating cuts to education in working class communities.

    M. President, it is no secret to anybody that our current health care system is far and away the most expensive in the world. We spend about twice as much per capita on health care as any other nation.

    Most Americans understand, and deal with the reality every day, that our health care system is dysfunctional. It takes forever to get a deal with the insurance companies and get your claims processed. It is extremely cruel. A significant number of people who are struggling with cancer end up going bankrupt because they cannot afford the outrageous cost of the hospital care that they have received. So what does this budget do to address our broken and dysfunctional health care system?

    Well, hard to believe, but it makes a terrible situation even worse. By cutting Medicaid by up to $880 billion, this legislation could force as many as 36 million Americans off the health care they currently have. Right now we have 85 million Americans who are uninsured or under-insured. That number would soar.

    Low income, working people who don’t have a lot of money – what happens when they get sick? 

    We lose 60,000 people a year right now, despite Medicaid, who don’t go to a doctor when they should because they can’t afford to. This budget would make that situation much, much worse. 

    And at a time when we have a massive crisis in primary health care: not enough doctors, not enough nurses, not enough mental health counselors, not enough primary care facilities where people can get in to a doctor when they need. By cutting Medicaid, this legislation would make it harder for people to access community health centers because community health centers are highly dependent on Medicaid for their funding.

    M. President, virtually every scientist who has studied the issue has made it clear that climate change is an existential threat to our planet. I understand that the current president of the United States thinks it’s a “hoax” originating in China. But that is not what 99.5 percent of the scientists who study the issue believe. And as we look around and see year after year becoming warmer, when we see the terrible flooding, drought and extreme weather disturbances taking place in our country and all over the world, the American people understand that climate change is all too real and is having devastating impacts on our lives. So what does this legislation do to address the extraordinary crisis that we face in terms of climate change? 

    Well, hard to believe, but it makes a bad situation even worse by opening up vast swaths of public lands to Big Oil companies so that they can “drill baby drill.” And it opens up public lands to more and more oil companies. Brilliant. We face an existential threat and this legislation makes that threat even worse.

    It seems to me, M. President, that instead of passing this absurd budget proposal, we should move in exactly the opposite direction that this proposal takes us.

    Instead of making life more difficult for the working class of our country, instead of rewarding the billionaire campaign contributors who fund many campaigns around here, maybe, just maybe, we should represent the needs of our constituents, the working families of this country.

    One of the ways we could do it is by raising the minimum wage to a living wage. I know that is a very radical idea around here. Imagine that. We raise the minimum wage which today is, at the federal level, $7.25 an hour. So we’re going to be offering an amendment to raise the minimum wage to a living wage: $17 an hour. 

    And maybe instead of making it harder for working families to find affordable housing, maybe, just maybe, we should build millions of units of low income, affordable housing. 

    Maybe, just maybe, instead of making it harder for families to access child care, we should make it easier and more affordable.

    And maybe, instead of cutting Medicaid by $880 billion, we should do what virtually every other major nation on Earth does. And that is to understand that health care is a human right, that every man, woman and child is entitled to health care as a human being, and that we can do that by passing a Medicare for All single-payer program.

    The function of a health care system should not be to make the insurance companies and the drug companies much wealthier, it should be to provide quality health care in a cost-effective way to all of our people.

    So there you go. What we have is a budget proposal in front of us that makes bad situations much worse and does virtually nothing to protect the needs of working families. But what it does do, of course, is reward wealthy campaign contributors by providing over $1 trillion in tax breaks for the top one percent.

    I’m going to vote against this proposal. That’s for sure.

    I wish my Republican friends the best of luck when they go home – if they dare to hold town hall meetings – and explain to their constituents why they think, at a time of massive income and wealth inequality, it’s a great idea to give tax breaks to billionaires and cut Medicaid, education, and other programs that working class families desperately need.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Hoeven Outlines Importance of Border Security in Stopping Flow of Fentanyl into American Communities

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for North Dakota John Hoeven

    04.04.25

    Hoeven Outlines Importance of Border Security in Stopping Flow of Fentanyl into American Communities

    Click for video and audio.

    WASHINGTON – During remarks delivered on the floor of the U.S. Senate this week, Senator John Hoeven outlined the importance of border security in stopping the flow of fentanyl into the U.S. from Mexico and Canada. The senator pointed to the success of President Trump enforcing the law and reinstating the kinds of policies that discourage illegal crossings and empower U.S. border professionals to do their jobs. 

    The remarks come as part of Hoeven’s efforts to push back on illegal immigration, advance policies that will make the border truly secure and protect America’s communities against criminal organizations that smuggle fentanyl and other illicit substances into the U.S. Among other efforts, Hoeven joined the U.S. Senate last month in passing the Halt All Lethal Trafficking (HALT) Fentanyl Act, legislation to permanently classify fentanyl-related substances as Schedule I and apply mandatory minimum sentencing for the trafficking of fentanyl-related substances.

    “The result of our country returning to common-sense border security policies can be seen in the numbers. In March, Border Patrol agents encountered just 7,181 illegal immigrants attempting to cross the southern border. This is a stark contrast compared to just one year ago, when under President Biden the total encounters for the month of March totaled 137,473. That represents a 95 percent decrease in crossings,” said Hoeven. 

    “On his first day in office, President Trump signed a series of executive orders addressing the border crisis that have been affecting our country, and began the process of removing criminals who had illegally entered under the previous administration. These executive actions have served as the first step in reversing the catch and release policies that allowed members of cartels, gangs, and violent transnational criminal organizations, like MS-13 and Tren de Aragua, to remain in the United States while operating criminal enterprises. By declaring an emergency at the border – DHS, DOD, and DOJ – were able to take a whole of government approach and began working together to identify the criminals that were illegally operating these networks within our country.

    “The result of these harmful Democrat open border policies has been felt by us all, and have turned every state into a border state. Leadership for the DEA Omaha Division, which includes my state, said it plainly and simply – the repeated presence of fentanyl in our communities is due to outside forces… CBP officers, Border Patrol agents, state, local, and tribal law enforcement are stepping up to take on the fentanyl crisis at our borders. I urge my Democratic colleagues to join us in a bipartisan way and support the effort to continue securing our border, and going after the criminals that have illegally entered our country and continue to do harm.”

    In addition, Hoeven stressed that the efforts of the Trump administration have resulted in Canada and Mexico stepping up their own border enforcement to help stop drug trafficking. Hoeven highlighted that:

    • In February, the President of Mexico agreed to send 10,000 National Guard troops to help secure its northern border with the U.S.
    • The Canadian government has:
      • Named a fentanyl czar and listed Mexican cartels as terrorist groups.
      • Launched a Canada-U.S. Joint Strike Force to combat organized crime, fentanyl and money laundering.
      • Increased its law enforcement presence at the border with a 56 percent increase in border personnel at land borders and ports of entry.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: FEMA Awards More Than $1 Million to Replace Helendale Township Bridge in Richland County

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator Kevin Cramer (R-ND)

    WASHINGTON, D.C. –  The U.S. Department of Homeland Security Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) awarded a total of $1,166,291 in federal funding to Richland County to replace the Helendale Bridge, an 82-foot, single-span steel truss bridge which was damaged from a severe winter storm and flooding event between April 22 – May 25, 2022.

    The structure will be replaced with a 142-foot, three-span concrete bridge using contract services which follow consensus-based codes and construction sstandards. The award will fund full demolition, excavation, foundation fill, rip rap, and bridge construction.

    While FEMA originally denied replacing the bridge, U.S. Senator Kevin Cramer (R-ND) worked with state officials to press the agency to approve federal assistance.

    The severe storms in April and May of 2022 caused major damages to North Dakota’s transportation and electrical infrastructure,” said Cramer. “In rural North Dakota, crossings like this are often the only option for residents for miles. This is a much-needed replacement for those affected by the damage to the Helendale Bridge, while also helping to mitigate the impacts of future disasters.”

    The North Dakota delegation wrote a letter in support of the state’s request for a presidential disaster declaration, which was submitted by then-Governor Doug Burgum on June 23, 2022. Former President Joe Biden approved the Major Disaster Declaration the next month on July 14.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Africa: Work continues to solve Matatiela rape case 

    Source: South Africa News Agency

    No effort will be spared in bringing the responsible parties to account in the case of the alleged sexual assault of a seven-year-old child in Matatiele, says Police Minister Senzo Mchunu.

    “What I can promise, on behalf of the Ministry of Police and the SAPS [South African Police Service] is that we are committed to upholding the law and ensuring that justice is served,” Mchunu said.

    The Minister was addressing a media briefing in Pretoria on Friday.

    “This is a matter that transcends individual tragedy, and we acknowledge the deep emotional impact it has had on our communities,” said the Minister, adding that the Eastern Cape matter is a sensitive one that police are handling and dealing with, with great sensitivity.

    “When the matter first came to our attention earlier this year, we sent a warrant officer to investigate the matter, interact with the complainant and the investigating officer, whilst looking at other related matters.

    “In the initial report we received from the warrant officer, we came to learn that the incident occurred in October last year, and a case was formally opened on the 16th of October 2024, following [the] medical examination of the minor and session with a social worker.”

    The Minister said from the report provided by the warrant officer, police concluded that the matter could have been handled better and still needed intervention.

    “We then realised that we needed to reinforce the team and have a dedicated officer on the matter. After the handling of the matter by the various offices, one critical aspect which has continued to present a serious challenge is the matter around DNA. DNA testing was done on the victim, with no foreign DNA having been found,” he explained.

    Three persons of interest have since emerged and following that, further DNA processing is underway as the investigation continues.

    “A thorough investigation is now fully underway, and I can assure you that we are consulting with all relevant role players to ensure that every aspect of this matter is examined carefully and comprehensively.”

    Additionally, he said the track record of the Family Violence, Child Protection (FCS) Unit remains commendable with more than 35 500 gender-based violence and femicide (GBVF) suspects arrested in the last two years.

    READ | FCS unit deployed to boost Matatiele case 

    “During the same period, 4500 accused were convicted to time in prison for GBVF related crimes and notably, 660 of them were sentenced to life in prison. This indeed, must illustrate the seriousness at which the SAPS treats victims of GBVF related crimes especially those involving young children,” Mchunu said.

    Citing police success in dealing with gender-based violence cases, Mchunu said in the past week alone, 259 rape suspects were arrested.

    “This week, we have also welcomed the arrest of a 58-year-old male educator on Monday afternoon, 31 March 2025, for an alleged rape incident of a 13-year-old female learner in the Capricorn District of Limpopo. The Educator has appeared before the Mankweng Magistrates Court and is facing a charge of rape.”

    Police will continue to support the family and the victim through the Employee Health and Wellness unit, including any other aspects related to the case. 

    “We assure the affected family of our full support and commitment to this case,” he said.

    On Saturday, the Ministry of Police assured members of the public that law enforcement is actively investigating two incidences involving the rape of minors in the Eastern Cape.

    This was after the Ministry took note of calls on various social media platforms regarding the tragic violation of the two minors in two separate incidences in October and November last year.

    In both incidences, the suspects have been identified and were arrested. – SAnews.gov.za

    MIL OSI Africa

  • MIL-OSI USA: CassidyDelivers Floor Speech on the National Debt, Saving the American Dream

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Louisiana Bill Cassidy

    WASHINGTON – U.S. Senator Bill Cassidy, M.D. (R-LA) delivered a speech on the U.S. Senate floor urging Congress to address the United States’ crushing national debt ahead of the budget resolution vote. Cassidy stressed that Congress must balance the national budget to preserve the American Dream.     
    “President Trump recognizes the relationship between our national debt and the family’s ability to achieve the American Dream… Balancing the budget is a key part of preserving the American dream,” said Dr. Cassidy.
    “Given the commitment from leadership to pay for this bill by a variety of means, whether it is within the reconciliation vehicle or outside of that process, and the need to reestablish confidence among those making business decisions and creating jobs, I will vote for this budget resolution,” continued Dr. Cassidy.  
    “I want America to be great for all Americans. That we can all live to the limits of our God given gifts. Creating opportunity is part of this. I hope, my expectation is that through this process we will create more opportunity to express God-given gifts, to achieve the American Dream,” concluded Dr. Cassidy.
    Background
    Earlier this week, Cassidy joined CNBC’s Squawk Box to discuss the need to address our national debt. In March, Cassidy penned an op-ed in The Hill highlighting the need for Congress to address the national debt and put an end to runaway spending moving the American Dream further out of reach for many families.
    Cassidy’s remarks as prepared for delivery are below:
    Mr. President, 
    Our country has some pretty severe economic challenges. I’m not talking about the recent stock market losses, although those are quite important to someone with a 401k. 
    I’m talking about how real Americans, average Americans, feel as if the American Dream of homeownership, of buying a new car or truck, of affording a student loan is slipping out of their grasp. 
    We saw this fear during the Biden administration when inflation was so high that interest rates rose. As interest rates rose, so did consumer interest rates on all sorts of things that directly impact the ability of a family to realize the American Dream. 
    This speech is about how do we preserve the ability of American families to achieve that dream and how what we are doing today impacts that. 
    It may seem pretty distant to the people watching at home, but what we are discussing today does directly impact this. 
    How much money the federal government borrows and how much this budget resolution leads to increased indebtedness sounds abstract but has a real impact on the American Dream.
    Some of the process discussions that normally wouldn’t matter to you if you’re outside of Congress are actually very important to this discussion on how much we’re going to borrow and how achievable the American Dream is for folks in Louisiana–the folks I represent.
    Let me explain. As our country borrows more money, it begins to compete with businesses, individuals, and families for the money that is out there to borrow. The federal government will always get the first amount. This drives up interest rates, which means that you pay more for your mortgage, car note, student loan and everything else.
    The only way to stop this from happening is for the federal government to live within its means. I think the inflation of the last four years is one of the main reasons the American people voted for President Trump. The Biden administration did not live within their means. The people wanted change. 
    President Trump recognizes the relationship between our national debt and the family’s ability to achieve the American Dream. In his joint address to Congress last month, he spoke both of renewing this Dream and of his desire to balance the nation’s budget.  
    I agree with him. Balancing the budget is a key part of preserving the American dream.
    Why is this important now? Our country is $36 trillion in debt now. We are scheduled to add another $21 trillion over the next 10 years if we do nothing. But if we do some of what we are speaking of today, but don’t pay for it, we will add another $5 to $11 trillion on top of the $21 trillion I mentioned. I’m a doctor–I’m going to borrow a term from medicine, we’d call this Congressional malpractice.
    At some point, the problem begins to build upon itself. Currently a fifth of tax revenue is used to pay interest on the debt. That is more than we spend on the national defense. Let me say that again. Right now, we’re paying more paying back people who lent us money than we are spending to keep our country safe, including paying our troops.
    There is an historian, Niall Ferguson, who says that this is the mark of a country in decline. Paying more on interest than you are on defense.
    Just last summer when he was still in the private sector, Treasury Secretary Bessent made a similar point in a Fox News op-ed. 
    He wrote that “America’s next national security crisis is lurking in our pocketbooks.” 
    That “our escalating debt crisis hurts national security in three key takeaways: it diminishes our financial ‘surge capacity,’ it robs our private sector of capital for productive investment, and it imperils America’s preeminent role in international financial markets.”
    Secretary Bessent is right–this is a threat to our national security and to the economic security of the American family.
    And families planning their budget know this. That’s why they live within their means. We should learn from them.
    Let’s discuss the budget resolution before us. To be sure, this resolution only sets up the discussion on the reconciliation bill. The reconciliation bill is where we will actually establish how much is spent and where it is spent. Nonetheless, this points in a direction and establishes an approach.
    Let me address my colleagues here about the process that has led up to this point. There has been a lot of Washington debate about using current policy versus the current law as baseline in this budget resolution. Current policy has never been used as baseline involving this much money in a reconciliation bill.
    The practical consequences of this is that using current policy increases the cost of this bill by $3.8 trillion. That is the difference between the red dotted line and the solid red line on this chart. 
    I have discussed this extensively with my Senate colleagues. There is a commitment from the President Trump and the White House to work with senators to go through the budget line by line to see where there can be savings. 
    The White House and Congress will work together to decrease the regulatory hassle that keeps our economy from achieving its full potential. This will increase revenue. 
    The president is working extremely hard now to make government work more efficiently, which saves taxpayers money.
    I have been assured that there is a commitment in other ways to pay for an eventual reconciliation bill.
    I am not saying that I think it is better that we use current policy as baseline. It establishes a dangerous precedent. It might be within the rules to do so, but it doesn’t mean that it is wise to do so. And to be a conservative is to know that sometimes you don’t open Pandora’s box, even if you can.
    And using current policy as baseline should not suggest to us that the current tax code is perfect. Far from it. According to publicly available information, Jeff Bezos got a child tax credit several years ago. Tax credits are supposed to go to middle income and lower income Americans, not to the second richest man in the world. Certainly, we can address that.
    But this vote is not taking place in a vacuum. It is taking place when the stock market has had two successive days of greater than 1500 points decline. This creates uncertainty which makes companies less likely to invest, which makes it less likely that new jobs will be created. Creating new good paying jobs is an essential to achieving the American dream. Not passing this budget resolution could increase the uncertainty in the economy, and that is something I do not wish to do.
    Given the commitment from leadership to pay for this bill by a variety of means, whether it is within the reconciliation vehicle or outside of that process, and the need to reestablish confidence among those making business decisions and creating jobs, I will vote for this budget resolution.  
    As we move on from this budget resolution to the reconciliation bill, I will look to make sure that we are truly addressing the national debt. 
    I will also encourage the use of America’s abundance as a way to both increase the possibility of Americans achieve the American dream and as a way to potentially pay for the government we now have. I applaud President Trump for advocating greater exploration of oil and gas. This creates great paying jobs, a tax base for communities, and significant revenue for the federal government. This is just one example of using America’s abundance for the benefit of us all. 
    I proposed other solutions that can address our nations indebtedness without raising taxes are cutting benefits. I have spoken to these in the past and will continue to advocate for them in the future.
    I want America to be great for all Americans. That we can all live to the limits of our God given gifts. Creating opportunity is part of this. I hope, my expectation is that through this process we will create more opportunity to express God-given gifts, to achieve the American dream. 
    With that I yield.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Canada: CMHA Cowichan Valley Branch opens Youth Emergency Shelter with support of legacy donor

    Source: Government of Canada regional news

    From CMHA-Cowichan Valley Branch: https://assets.nationbuilder.com/cowichancmha/pages/102/attachments/original/1743800294/NR_CMHA_Media_Release_FINAL_updated.pdf?1743800294

    In June 2024, the Ministry of Children and Family Development and Canadian Mental Health Association – Cowichan Valley Branch (CMHA-CVB) announced plans to establish a Youth Emergency Shelter or YES pilot project. Less than one year later, the Cowichan YES is now officially open and ready to support the youth in Duncan who need it most.

    Youth aged 15 to 18 years who are in crisis, or at risk of harm or homelessness, will have access to critical supports delivered by the Cowichan YES open day and night for youth in need.  

    Several youth who have visited the YES have echoed the essence of the program’s purpose. “Wow, this is a house, and it feels like a home” –  youth aged 16. Another youth noted the comfort of the bedrooms. “I can come and stay in a real bedroom with a real bed, some of the beds are huge.” – youth aged 17. Another excited youth commented on the program’s amenities by joyfully exclaiming, “You have a gym in here? When can I use it?”

    “I am pleased to announce that a safe space for the most vulnerable youth in the Cowichan Valley is not only a reality today but will become a legacy for years to come,” said Laurie Harding, CMHA-CVB board chair. “This dream was made possible by CMHA-CVB, along with the incredible support of hundreds of local community members volunteering their time, resources, and donations through our annual Coldest Night of the Year campaign.”  

    Approximately $204,000 was raised between 2022 and 2024 through the CMHA-CVB campaigns and those funds were used as a down payment to purchase a home, which has been transformed into this vital shelter space for youth.

    “With the opening of this shelter, the most vulnerable youth in the Cowichan Valley will have a safe place to turn, day or night, when they find themselves with nowhere else to go,” said Jodie Wickens, Minister of Children and Family Development. “This home is another important resource to keep Cowichan youth safer by connecting them to the supports they need when they need them.”

    In addition to the funds from the Coldest Night of the Year campaigns and up to $4 million funding from the Province, the Mischa Weisz Foundation donated $450,000. That donation will allow CMHA-CVB to pay off the mortgage and to purchase a van to provide outreach to youth in Duncan and outlying communities within the Cowichan Valley Regional District (CVRD). The significant legacy donation will help transform the lives of some of the most vulnerable young people in the Cowichan Valley.

    Recognizing with respect that YES Cowichan is located on Quw’utsun lands, and for the generous donation by the Mischa Weisz Foundation, the name Mischa Lelum has been chosen to recognize both the legacy of Mischa Weisz and because “Lelum” is a fitting Hulqiminum word meaning home.

    “We know that many young people in our community have been facing significant challenges since the pandemic,” said Debra Toporowski, MLA, Cowichan Valley. “It’s so gratifying to see the dedication and hard work of Cowichan Tribes, CMHA, community partners, the B.C. government and even an individual donor, come to fruition to make a difference for vulnerable youth.”

    “The creation of this home is reflective of our collective strength as a community, wisdom as an organization, and the unwavering care and concern for those we serve,” says Laurie Harding, CMHA-CVB board president. “Through a commitment to supporting a healthier community, it is our hope that our actions clearly demonstrate that ‘Everyone Matters.’  We cannot do this work alone, and we are extremely grateful to community partners who have supported our work by walking with us, volunteering, and through their generous donations. Thank you as well to MCFD, Guido Weisz, and all of you here today for working collaboratively with us. Through our partnerships, we demonstrate that ‘We are Better Standing Together’ and that our youth matter.”  

    The Cowichan Valley YES is one more youth-centred service that CMHA-CVB offers.

    Background:

    YES Cowichan

    The Youth Emergency Shelter is a 24/7 therapeutic community-based crisis service in Duncan that provides a temporary safe placement (one to 14 days) for youth who are experiencing homelessness, or unstable/precarious living situations, and are in need of a temporary placement and support services. Currently there are three bedrooms available. YES consists of three essential elements: overnight shelter, drop-in day programming, and outreach services. Community partners will provide wraparound supports to youth accessing the YES and will work together to ensure youth receive the resources and assistance they require. Youth will be involved in the design and implementation of the programs to ensure those fit their needs.  The first YES opened in Maple Ridge in December 2023.

    Cowichan Youth at Home Team

    The YES program is a result of efforts led by the Cowichan Youth at Home Team: a partnership organization made up of members from CMHA-CVB, Cowichan Tribes, Cowichan Valley School District, Cowichan Valley Youth Services, Island Health Population and Public Health, Our Communities Health Network, and the Ministry of Children and Family Development. “We are grateful to our community partners for their collective commitment and hard work in making a safe space a reality. Together we are making a difference because we believe that ‘Every Child Matters’.”

    Mischa Weisz Foundation

    The Mischa Weisz Foundation has been supporting unhoused youth by providing a grant that has been delivering food and making critical connections over the past three years. Mischa was an entrepreneur whose life was, sadly, cut short. Deeply grounded in his life values, Mischa believed that youth are the future and that we should invest in them if we want to make the world a better place. He also believed that “while people may be trapped in unfortunate circumstances, or disadvantaged by complex factors, all of us have potential within us,” says his brother Guido Weisz. Mischa created the Mischa Weisz Foundation which has been co-managed by his brother.

    MIL OSI Canada News