NewzIntel.com

Category: Universities

  • MIL-Evening Report: 100 years of boom and bust: a potted history of Hollywood’s long relationship with Australia

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Andrew James Couzens, Lecturer in Digital Media, CQUniversity Australia

    Donald Trump has said the United States should be applying tariffs to movies “produced in foreign lands”. This has the potential to deeply impact the Australian film industry.

    Local crews are currently celebrating a boom in big budget production at studios on the Gold Coast, Sydney and Melbourne. Over the last five years, foreign production has represented almost half of all drama production expenditure in Australia.

    But the history of Hollywood making movies in Australia warns us not to get complacent.

    When times are good for Australian film crews they can be very good indeed. But global events can leave studios empty and film crew without work.



    Read more:
    How do you put a tariff on movies? Here’s what Trump’s plan could mean for Australia

    How Hollywood influenced Australian cinema

    Hollywood’s influence was felt in Australian production from the silent era.

    For its 1927 adaptation of Marcus Clarke’s literary classic For the Term of His Natural Life, local production and distribution company Australasian Films hired Hollywood director Norman Dawn. They felt this was necessary to appeal to American audiences.

    For most of the 20th century, Hollywood production used Australia for its exotic setting. Films like On the Beach (1959), Kangaroo (1952) and The Sundowners (1960) brought their crews from America, rather than using Australians.

    By the late 1960s, Hollywood’s cultural dominance was seen as a serious problem.

    The Australian federal government established new grant and investment schemes for local films, intended to establish Australian culture in response to American influence.

    The local industry’s independence was fervently protected, and we saw the release of films like Picnic at Hanging Rock (1975) and Newsfront (1978), aimed at establishing a distinct Australian film culture.

    The international box office success of George Miller’s 1979 film Mad Max motivated a shift to more commercial, Hollywood-aligned filmmaking in Australia. Many in the industry argued the film illustrated the value of pursuing a popular cinema modelled on American production practices.

    This laid the groundwork for Hollywood to become even more integrated with the local production industry.

    Studios and infrastructure

    The 1988 opening of Village Roadshow Studios and the filming of the 1988 Mission Impossible television series on the Gold Coast ignited the relationship between the Australian film industry and Hollywood that exists today.

    These studios were followed by Fox Studios Australia (now Disney Studios Australia) in Sydney, home to productions including The Matrix and Star Wars: Episodes I–III.

    These studios acquired international investment from Hollywood studios and received significant state government support. They supported new collaborations between Hollywood and the Australian film industry, though some criticised this direction for Australian cinema.

    Throughout the 1990s, there was a rapid increase in the quantity of footloose production – a term referring to films originating from Hollywood but shooting elsewhere to reduce costs.

    The comparatively weak Australian dollar, low labour and construction costs, and strong state government incentives meant that blockbusters like The Matrix could cut their budgets by as much as a third by shooting in Australia rather than Hollywood.

    The local industry grew as big budget Hollywood films created jobs for Australian production crews. These crews depended on a steady supply of foreign production, because local productions were not big enough to support local crews.

    Bust

    The Australian film production industry was thrust into crisis in the second half of the 2000s, when a strong Australian dollar coupled with the global financial crisis wiped out the supply of footloose productions.

    In 2008–09, foreign production brought just A$31 million into the country, from a high in 2003–04 of $519 million, adjusted for inflation.

    This saw screen employment drop and some production facilities close.

    Industry lobbying encouraged the federal government to introduce a 16.5% location tax offset for foreign films shooting in Australia, and a 30% tax offset for post, digital and visual effects.

    Combined with the weakening Australian dollar, this brought Hollywood production back with a vengeance by 2014–15.

    But the impact that a dry spell of blockbuster production could have on the Australian industry gave Hollywood producers significant negotiating power. In response, state and federal governments offered heavy hitters like Disney’s Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Men Tell No Tales (2017) and Thor: Ragnarok (2017) tens of millions of dollars on top of existing offsets.

    Boom

    In 2020–21, the expenditure of foreign films shooting in Australia more than doubled compared to previous years. This was due to Australia, and especially Queensland, being one of the few places in the world where production could take place during COVID lockdowns.

    Foreign production, especially on the Gold Coast, exploded.

    Studio infrastructure was stretched to breaking point, with some films using makeshift studio spaces like the Gold Coast Convention and Exhibition Centre.

    Due to stretched infrastructure, parts of the film Spiderhead were shot in the Gold Coast convention centre.
    Netflix

    Growing capacity became a policy priority, and significant investment was directed towards training crew and expanding studio facilities.

    The boom in Hollywood expenditure in Australia has resulted in an expansion of local production capability through crew training and investment in facilities.

    But, as the global financial crisis bust shows, growth can be a double edged sword. It requires a consistent supply of footloose production to sustain itself.

    The anxiety around Trump’s recently proposed tariffs demonstrates the Australian film industry remains dependent on footloose production.

    Policy must now address how to exploit boom periods to support sustainability during the inevitable bust.

    Andrew James Couzens has received funding from The Gold Coast Film Commission.

    – ref. 100 years of boom and bust: a potted history of Hollywood’s long relationship with Australia – https://theconversation.com/100-years-of-boom-and-bust-a-potted-history-of-hollywoods-long-relationship-with-australia-256079

    MIL OSI Analysis – EveningReport.nz –

  • MIL-OSI Russia: Scientific Regiment: MIEi Graduate Arkady Pashenin Witnesses Signing of the Act of Surrender of Germany

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: State University of Management – Official website of the State –

    Exactly 80 years ago, the Great Patriotic War ended. This fact was confirmed by the Act of Unconditional Surrender of the German Armed Forces. And today, on Victory Day, we will tell the story of how an engineering diploma from the Moscow Engineering and Economics Institute (now the State University of Management) allowed its graduate Arkady Pashenin to witness the signing of this historic document.

    Arkady Pashenin was born on March 19, 1918, entered the construction department of the Moscow Institute of Power Engineering in 1935, and defended his diploma five days after the start of the war – on June 27, 1941. According to him, Soviet youth was mentally prepared for war. In companies, they did not discuss ways to evade, but what was better to take to the front in addition to the recommended list. And the state took care of the physical condition of the youth – in addition to standard military training, the Moscow Institute of Power Engineering had a strong ski section of the Rot Front sports society, of which Arkady Pashenin was a member. Team “Ski Patrol Races” were especially popular with students.

    On July 8, the day after receiving diploma #025980, graduate Pasheshin reported to the recruiting station, where the duty officer, having familiarized himself with the documents, sent him to the military commissar. The latter looked at the diploma and sent the conscript to the Military Academy of Logistics and Supply, where he completed a three-month training course. In September 1942, Arkady Pashenin served at the headquarters of the 276th Ski Regiment when he was summoned to Moscow, to the People’s Commissariat of Defense, where he was thoroughly discussed with him about the diploma and sent to Stalingrad, to the headquarters of the 5th Shock Army, which was being formed at that time. He served there until the army was disbanded after the war.

    The most dramatic turn of fate connected with the MIE diploma happened to our hero at the end of the war, near Warsaw. One winter day at the turn of 1944/45, he was summoned by the head of the personnel department of the army headquarters and again asked about the specialty of an engineer-economist. It turned out that a member of the Military Council of the army, Lieutenant General Fyodor Bokov, was looking for three personal assistants of different specialties. Officers from the operational and political departments were selected immediately, but there was no suitable candidate for an economist who could “distinguish a bakery from a sawmill.” After a ten-minute conversation with Bokov, Pashenin was accepted into the team.

    As a result of the Berlin Offensive Operation, the German troops were finally defeated. It remained to formalize the situation legally. Marshal of the Soviet Union Georgy Zhukov chose the headquarters of the 5th Shock Army as the place for signing the Act of Unconditional Surrender, so on May 8, 1945, Fyodor Bokov and his assistants, including Arkady Pashenin, were among those meeting the Allied delegation at the Tempelhof airfield. The diplomatic service was late with instructions on the protocol of the meeting, so the staff officers decided to run for the flags of the nations themselves half an hour before the arrival of the first plane. They were unable to find the French flag right away, fortunately the plane of the Commander-in-Chief of the French Army, General Jean de Latre de Tassigny, was late, and he was met later, separately from the British and Americans. Major of the Quartermaster Service Pashenin had the honor of holding the flag of the USSR, which he remembered for the rest of his life:

    “So we, three Russian officers, stood in the center of Europe with the flags of nations. The famous generals and marshals of the allied armies walked past us. Eisenhower, Montgomery, Tedder and others saluted the flags, including the flag of the USSR, which by the will of fate I, a graduate of the Moscow Institute of Economics and Law in 1941, was entrusted to hold.”

    Let’s forgive Arkady Mikhailovich for the historical inaccuracy. As is well known, the Instrument of Surrender on the part of Great Britain was signed not by Field Marshal Bernard Montgomery, but by the Supreme Commander of the Royal Air Force Arthur Tedder. The Americans were represented not by the future President Dwight Eisenhower, but by the Chief of Staff of the US Air Force Carl Spaatz. But just imagine how exciting this moment was for what was essentially a very young officer, and sometimes even the young are deceived by memory.

    The headquarters of the 5th Shock Army was located in the building of the Military Engineering School in Karlshorst, one of the eastern suburbs of Berlin, where everyone headed from the airfield. The hall of the officers’ mess was prepared for the ceremony, the furniture was brought from the Reich Chancellery building. As a staff officer, Arkady Pashenin had free access to all the rooms of the headquarters and did not miss the opportunity to be present at the signing of the Act of Surrender. The extra chairs were taken out of the hall, so everyone except the signatories watched the ceremony standing. Pashenin took a place by the wall near a small table, at which the Chief of the Supreme Command of the Armed Forces of Nazi Germany Wilhelm Keitel then sat.

    The ceremony began at exactly midnight Moscow time. Hence the disagreement about the date of Victory Day celebrations in Russia and the West. When it came to Keitel, he was about to sign the Act at his desk, but Georgy Zhukov demanded that he come over and sign the Act on a side table. Jawohl (German for “Yes sir”), the blushing Field Marshal complied. This was the German word the Nazis used more often than any other at the ceremony.

    The procedure ended at 00:43 Moscow time, after which the banquet began. Suddenly the question arose: what to feed the German delegation – not red caviar? Even the diplomats could not resolve it. Then they turned to Zhukov for advice, and he said: “Let’s not be petty – feed them everything that has been prepared for the banquet. And be sure to serve it on plates with the monograms of the Imperial Chancellery. And give them unlimited drinks. Let them wash down their defeat… But I think it will not do them any good!”

    And so it happened: Wilhelm Keitel was executed by decision of the International Military Tribunal in Nuremberg on October 16, 1946. Another representative of the German government who signed the Act of Surrender, General Admiral Hans von Friedeburg, poisoned himself with cyanide the day before his arrest.

    And MIEI graduate Arkady Mikhailovich Pashenin served in the Soviet Army until 1978 and retired with the rank of colonel of the quartermaster service. He was awarded five orders and five medals, including, of course, “For the capture of Berlin” and “For the victory over Germany in the Great Patriotic War of 1941-1945.”

    #Scientific regiment

    Arkady Pashenin Arkady Pashenin Wilhelm Keitel signs the Act of Surrender From left to right: Arthur Tedder, Georgy Zhukov and Carl Spaatz at the banquet after the signing of the Act of Surrender

    Subscribe to the TG channel “Our GUU” Date of publication: 05/08/2025

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    MIL OSI Russia News –

  • MIL-OSI Russia: Happy birthday to academician Georgy Kleiner!

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: State University of Management – Official website of the State –

    On May 8, the day before the 80th anniversary of the Great Victory, the State University of Management congratulates one of the leading economists of the university and all of Russia, head of the Department of Institutional Economics at the IEF SUMU, Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Doctor of Economics, Professor Georgy Kleiner on his birthday.

    Of course, these are not all of his positions and titles. For now, it will be enough to say that Georgy Borisovich at one time developed the concept of multi-level strategic planning, created a school of modern system analysis of the real sector of the Russian economy, and laid the foundations of the theory of systemic economics. Over the past 15 years, Professor Kleiner has been one of the first in the citation rating of Russian economists according to the Russian Science Citation Index. And there is something to cite, because he has written about 850 different scientific papers. For more than a quarter of a century, the hero of today’s celebration has been working at the State University of Management and still speaks at conferences and his open lectures, sharing his extensive knowledge of economics and life experience.

    From the bottom of our hearts and the entire university, we would like to wish Georgy Borisovich good health, many years of productive scientific life, work activity and pleasant rest in moments of peace.

    Subscribe to the TG channel “Our GUU” Date of publication: 05/08/2025

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    MIL OSI Russia News –

  • MIL-OSI: Temenos community comes together in Madrid to lead the way in banking innovation

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    GRAND-LANCY, Switzerland, May 08, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Temenos (SIX: TEMN), a global leader in banking technology, today announced that over a thousand global banking industry representatives will come together at the Temenos Community Forum (TCF) in Madrid, May 20-22, to explore transformative technologies shaping the future of banking. Registration for the event is open and an invitation can be requested here.

     “Leading the Way” is the theme of this year’s TCF, which will feature over 60 engaging sessions highlighting bold ideas, product innovations and cutting-edge technology to help banks address operational challenges and stay ahead of the curve.

    With a focus on the transformative potential of Generative AI, the agenda will feature Dr Jonnie Penn, Associate Teaching Professor of AI Ethics and Society at the University of Cambridge, who will share his insights on the technology, as well as best practice and use cases in banking.

    This will be complemented by the real-world experience of banks such as ABN Amro, Banque Internationale à Luxembourg and EQ Bank showcasing how they are unlocking innovation, enhancing efficiency and elevating customer experiences. They will be among over 40 Temenos customers sharing their insights at the event, with leading financial institutions including Commerce Bank, Komerční banka and Credem.

    The event will also feature Temenos’ extensive partner ecosystem, including Platinum sponsors HCLTech and Microsoft, as well as Gold sponsors Capgemini, Cognizant, IBM, NTT Data and Tech Mahindra, and other innovative fintech solution partners.

    Through an engaging and interactive program, attendees will gain insights on Temenos’ product roadmap and the latest advances in core banking, digital and payments through product demos, in-depth breakout sessions and meetings with Temenos experts. They will be able to join roundtables to share knowledge and best practices with their peers on high-impact topics such as migrating core banking systems, moving to SaaS, deploying a Gen AI governance model to better enhance customer experience, and fighting fraud without increasing risk.

    Isabelle Guis, Chief Marketing Officer, Temenos, commented: “The financial industry is at a turning point as banks grapple with the opportunities and challenges of emerging technologies, evolving regulations and shifting customer expectations. Banks collectively spend around $650bn annually on IT, more as a percentage of revenue than any other industry. Top performers invest more of their IT spend on growth and innovation, successfully harnessing technology as a differentiator. At TCF 2025, banks have a unique opportunity to learn from those leading the way, discuss bold ideas and together explore how to unlock the huge potential of GenAI and other game-changing technologies. I look forward to welcoming our customers and partners to Madrid as we work together to shape the future of banking.”

    The MIL Network –

  • MIL-OSI Banking: New BSTDB Vice President Banking Assumes Duties

    Source: Black Sea Trade and Development Bank

    Press Release | 08-May-2025

    Mr. Aliyev to Lead Banking Operations and Lending Strategy

    Following a nomination by the Republic of Azerbaijan, Mr. Ziya Aliyev assumed today his duties as the new Vice President Banking of the Black Sea Trade and Development Bank (BSTDB). In his role, he will oversee the Bank’s banking operations, including the development and execution of its lending strategy and client engagement.

    “I am thrilled to join BSTDB  and serve its vital development mandate. I look forward to working under the leadership of President Köksal and alongside my colleagues in the Management Committee  to advance  the Bank’s mission. I am eager to leverage my previous experience to bear for the sustainable development and economic  growth of  the Black Sea region, particularly as we navigate today’s complex challenges.”, said Mr. Aliyev on assuming his duties.

    Prior to joining BSTDB, Mr. Aliyev served as Advisor to the Governor at the Central Bank of the Republic of Azerbaijan, where he provided strategic advice on monetary and exchange rate policy, banking supervision, and capital market regulation. Having started his career at the Central Bank in 2000, he progressively advanced through senior roles in research, monetary policy, and strategic development.  From 2013 to 2025, he held the position of Executive Director, overseeing critical departments including Insurance Supervision, Financial Consumer Protection, Strategic Management, and Risk Management.

    Mr. Aliyev has also made notable contributions to Azerbaijan’s national development initiatives. He co-authored the Strategy for National Education Development, approved by the President of the Republic of Azerbaijan in 2013, and played a supportive role in preparing Azerbaijan 2030: National Priorities on Socio-Economic Development, a strategic policy framework adopted in 2021.

    His contributions to the financial sector were acknowledged with the “Progress” Medal, awarded by the President of the Republic of Azerbaijan.

    He has taught business development and strategic management courses at the Center for Banking Education (2019–2020), and previously lectured on development economics and strategic management at the Azerbaijan State Economic University and ADA University.

    His academic background includes a Master of Arts in Policy Economics from the Center for Development Economics at Williams College (USA), and a Master and Bachelor of Science in Finance & Credit from the Azerbaijan State Economic University.

    Mr. Aliyev is fluent in English, Azerbaijani, Russian and Turkish.

     

    The Black Sea Trade and Development Bank (BSTDB) is an international financial institution established by Albania, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bulgaria, Georgia, Greece, Moldova, Romania, Russia, Türkiye, and Ukraine. The BSTDB headquarters are in Thessaloniki, Greece. BSTDB supports economic development and regional cooperation by providing loans, credit lines, equity and guarantees for projects and trade financing in the public and private sectors in its member countries. The authorized capital of the Bank is EUR 3.45 billion. For information on BSTDB, visit www.bstdb.org.

     

    Contact: Haroula Christodoulou

    : @BSTDB

    MIL OSI Global Banks –

  • MIL-Evening Report: In the age of the influencer, does the political backing of News Corp matter anymore?

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Edward Hurcombe, Senior Lecturer in Media and Communication, RMIT University

    This year’s federal election demonstrated that Australia’s media landscape has changed. Big players are no longer “kingmakers” in politics.

    Influencers on TikTok and Instagram have seemingly become journalists. Politicians are going on podcasts, and campaign advertising has become memes.

    Australia’s news media has historically been concentrated in the hands of a few large companies. Now there are fresh new voices.

    But who are these new players? Are they even “journalists”? And to what extent are older media, such as News Corp, still influential?

    Too much attention?

    Labor’s stunning victory on Saturday night defied even the most optimistic predictions. But it was also evidence of the apparently declining influence of the largest commercial media company operating in Australia, News Corp.

    In the recent past, News Corp and its owner Rupert Murdoch were regarded by politicians as a major factor in deciding elections. Getting on Murdoch’s good side was an important goal for budding prime ministers.

    But despite its major papers supporting the Coalition at every state and federal election since 2010, the Labor Party still wins elections.

    In the aftermath of the Coalition’s smashing defeat, commentators were even openly considering whether the Liberal and National parties were providing Murdoch and its Sky News channel with too much attention.

    Analysts have suggested the Coalition’s fixation on “culture wars”, promoted by Sky News television hosts, left them out of touch with the issues ordinary Australians care about. The Coalition’s focus on Welcome to Country ceremonies in the final weeks of the campaign is an example of this tone-deaf misstep.



    Read more:
    In its soul-searching, the Coalition should examine its relationship with the media

    Shifts of influence

    The other major feature of this election was the rise of influencers. This started in December last year, when Peter Dutton appeared on Sam Fricker’s podcast. Fricker is a former diver with 168,000 Instagram followers.

    Anthony Albanese followed suit in early 2025, when he appeared on Abbie Chatfield’s podcast. Chatfield is a politically progressive Instagram star with more than 560,000 followers.

    Influencers weren’t just interviewing politicians, however. They were also reporting the news. In March, a dozen influencers were invited by the Labor Party to participate in the annual budget lock-up.

    The privilege of reading the budget ahead of its official launch is usually reserved for journalists, but financial and feminist influencers, among others, were also included.

    Some news outlets raised eyebrows at this development, while others expressed concern at reports the Labor Party had funded the travel costs for these influencers.

    But what was clear was the government felt it could no longer rely on traditional media to get the message out. Instead, it recognised that influencers are now a major source of news for many people – especially young people.



    Read more:
    Social media is the new election battleground. Is embracing influencers smart, risky or both?

    How do we make sense of this?

    Does this mean influencers have replaced journalists? Well, it’s more complicated than that.

    Research from the University of Canberra has shown young audiences receive most of their news from social media, and video content is increasingly popular for this demographic. The video platform YouTube has also become a powerhouse for political content, and upstart digital outlets such as The Daily Aus on Instagram have cemented themselves as legitimate news sources.

    But we shouldn’t ignore traditional media. The ABC, along with SBS, is still the most trusted news source in Australia. The ABC’s recent election night coverage broke viewership records.

    Established media has also been experimenting in digital news. This includes Guardian Australia’s influencer-style TikTok content, and the “Politics Explained” videos produced by the ABC’s multiplatform journalism team.

    These developments in Australia reflect what’s been happening in the United States, where legacy outlets such as the LA Times and the Washington Post have become adept at creating fun, accessible and informative news content for digital audiences.

    The recent focus on influencers also neglects how Australian news has been facing digital disruption for decades. In the 2010s, BuzzFeed Australia was also producing accessible and millennial-friendly news, and faced similar controversy when its journalists joined the Canberra Press Gallery.

    Still, influencers present both opportunities and challenges for news. On the one hand, they can reach audiences who would otherwise be avoiding news. They can provide fresh new perspectives on issues, especially on topics relevant to young people, such as housing.

    However, their ambivalent status also can present ethical concerns. Not being bound by newsroom codes of conduct can be freeing, but it can result in the transparency issues we saw in the budget lock-up.

    Influencers’ emphasis on “authenticity” can also lead to partisan news coverage. Some influencers who call themselves “citizen journalists” have even been accused of spreading misinformation.

    Australia’s news landscape is much more diverse than it used to be. But it’s also more complex than simply a story of old versus new media.

    Edward Hurcombe receives funding from the Australian Research Council.

    – ref. In the age of the influencer, does the political backing of News Corp matter anymore? – https://theconversation.com/in-the-age-of-the-influencer-does-the-political-backing-of-news-corp-matter-anymore-255876

    MIL OSI Analysis – EveningReport.nz –

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Canberra on screen

    Source: Northern Territory Police and Fire Services

    The ABC series Austin was filmed in Canberra.

    In brief:

      • Canberra has featured in Australian and international films and television series.
      • These are some of the iconic locations that have featured on screen.

    As a local, there’s nothing quite like seeing Canberra on screen.

    Whether it’s a spot in your neighbourhood, a cultural institution or our bushland, Canberra has been a backdrop to several films and television shows.

    Here are some of the locations that have been featured on screen:

    The Hyatt Hotel Canberra

    This is one of many Canberra locations used to film the ABC comedy series, Austin. The Hyatt is a regular feature and appears as the ‘Canberra Hotel’ in the show.

    Some of the other Canberra locations that were used for filming include:

    • Book Lore and The Front in Lyneham
    • The Marion
    • The National Library of Australia
    • Rebel Rebel.

    Constitution Avenue

    Blacklight is an action film starring Liam Neeson and set in Washington DC. During 2021, an action scene was filmed on the streets of Canberra. Despite being edited to look as though the scene took place in DC, Canberra residents will recognise some familiar scenery.

    Notable locations include:

    • the underground carpark at the National Gallery of Australia
    • Glebe Park and the surrounding area.

    The Parliamentary Triangle

    The political thriller television series Secret City was filmed inside of Parliament House. You’ll see the prime minister’s office, the Press Gallery, and the building’s exterior to name a few.

    Some other Canberra locations you’ll spot include:

    • Commonwealth Avenue Bridge
    • Lake Burley Griffin
    • Australian National University
    • Ovolo Canberra
    • The National Gallery of Australia.

    Other TV shows and films that feature Parliament House include:

    • Total Control
    • The Hollowmen.

    Kambah Inn

    Somersault is a 2004 drama film starring Abbie Cornish and Sam Worthington. Most of the film is set in Jindabyne, but some of it was filmed in Canberra. Kambah Inn is featured, and some Canberrans will recognise the old Belconnen Interchange.

    The High Court of Australia

    Mabo tells the life story of Eddie ‘Koiki’ Mabo and his part in the landmark case that overturned the doctrine of terra nullius. It starts Jimi Bani and Deborah Mailman and The High Court of Australia is visible in the film.

    The High Court of Australia also featured briefly in film The Castle. It is the setting for Darryl Kerrigan’s (played by Michael Caton) legal battle to protect his family home.

    Gungahlin Skate Park

    Skate parks and Kingsley’s Chicken are two of Canberra’s most popular locations for teenagers. It’s fitting that they are featured in the 2013 film Galore. The film is set in suburban Canberra and tells the story of a group of teenagers in the lead up to the 2003 bushfires. Scrivener Dam is also visible in part of the film.

    Black Mountain Tower

    Blue World Order is a 2017 film directed by Ché Baker and Dallas Bland. It’s set in a post-apocalyptic world and stars Titanic actor Billy Zane. There is even a cameo from ACT Chief Minister Andrew Barr.

    The iconic Black Mountain Tower is visible in the film. Scenes were also shot at the Australian National University and Wee Jasper Caves.

    Read more like this

    Get ACT news and events delivered straight to your inbox, sign up to our email newsletter:


    MIL OSI News –

  • MIL-OSI Banking: Secretary-General of ASEAN to conduct a Working Visit to New Zealand

    Source: ASEAN – Association of SouthEast Asian Nations

    At the invitation of the Government of New Zealand, Secretary-General of ASEAN, Dr. Kao Kim Hourn, will lead the ASEAN Secretariat delegation for a Working Visit to New Zealand, on 12 to 14 May 2025, covering Auckland and Wellington. Throughout the entire programme of the visit, SG Dr. Kao is scheduled to meet with key stakeholders, including The Right Honourable Christopher Luxon, Prime Minister of New Zealand, as well as with Ministers of the New Zealand Government, parliamentarians, business community and private sectors, academia, youth and students. During his stay in Auckland, SG Dr. Kao will take the opportunity to give a lecture to a group of students and faculty members at the University of Auckland to convey ASEAN’s narratives as well as to promote ASEAN’s diplomacy and visibility. In addition, SG Dr. Kao will also engage with the ASEAN Committee in Wellington. The Working Visit is an undertaking aimed to further strengthening the ASEAN-New Zealand enduring partnership and cooperation, particularly as ASEAN and New Zealand would commemorate the 50th Anniversary of their Dialogue Relations this year.
    The post Secretary-General of ASEAN to conduct a Working Visit to New Zealand appeared first on ASEAN Main Portal.

    MIL OSI Global Banks –

  • MIL-Evening Report: ‘Everyone lives in fear’: trapped between two warring nuclear giants, the people of Kashmir continue to suffer

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Leoni Connah, Lecturer in International Relations, Flinders University

    Tensions between India and Pakistan escalated this week after India launched missile strikes on its long-time rival, killing more than 30 people.

    India was retaliating for a terror attack on tourists in Indian-controlled Kashmir on April 22, which killed 26 civilians, most of them Indian. New Delhi has blamed a Pakistan-based militant group for the incident.

    Pakistan has vowed revenge for the airstrikes, calling them an “act of war”.

    If a full-scale war does break out between the two nuclear powers, it wouldn’t be the first time they have fought over the disputed region of Kashmir. In fact, the two sides have been in conflict over Kashmir since 1947.

    The people of Kashmir, meanwhile, are stuck in the middle of this geopolitical rivalry, trapped in a security state with little hope for the future.

    Life before the April 22 terror attack

    Before the attack on the tourists last month, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government had made repeated claims that “normalcy” was returning to the region.

    However, Kashmir remains one of the most heavily militarised zones in the world and the people have long suffered human rights abuses the Indian government has justified on the grounds of counter-terrorism.

    In 2019, the Modi government revoked Article 370 of the Indian constitution, which had granted a special status to the state of Jammu and Kashmir, along with a high degree of autonomy.

    The revocation of this article brought Jammu and Kashmir, now a “union territory”, under the full control of the Modi government in New Delhi.

    This decision was made on behalf of Kashmiris, not in consultation with them. Speaking with Kashmiris in 2020 as part of my ongoing research on the region, there was a huge sense of betrayal at the move.

    One of my interview subjects claimed Indian security forces were “instilling fear and psychological warfare” in Kashmir. Another said “it’s no exaggeration to say after every three kilometres, there’s a checkpoint” manned by Indian security forces. The situation worsened during the COVID pandemic, with increased lockdowns and curfews.

    Some hope did return last September when Kashmiris were able to vote in regional assembly elections for the first time in a decade.

    The election meant the new local assembly would have the power to make and amend laws, debate local issues and approve decisions for the territory, particularly in education and culture.

    However, this doesn’t mean “normalcy” had returned, nor was Kashmir peaceful and tranquil.

    In February of this year, there were reports that Indian security forces had conducted operations against suspected militants, resulting in a lockdown and 500 people being detained.

    A young Kashmiri man died by suicide after allegedly being tortured by police in February. The next day, another man was shot dead by the army.

    These are just two incidents that are part of a wider cycle of violence that has become a part of everyday life in Kashmir.

    Life after April 22

    After the April 22 tourist attack, the central government has doubled down on its heavy-handed approach to Kashmir under the guise of counter-terrorism.

    Kashmiris have been subjected to an increased security presence, new lockdowns, “cordon and search operations”, social media surveillance, house demolitions and other draconian measures.

    Police say some 1,900 Kashmiris have been detained and questioned since the attack. This number will no doubt continue to rise.

    It is no wonder Kashmiris were saying “everyone lives in fear”, even before India launched missile strikes on its neighbour.

    Possible retaliation from Pakistan – or a wider war – now looms, with Kashmiris again on the front lines.

    Calls for India to follow Israel’s lead

    There is a very big concern that right-wing Indian media outlets and social media posts are now encouraging the Indian government to respond to the terror attack in the same way Israel has retaliated against Hamas in Gaza.

    Some commentators are portraying the April 22 attack as India’s version of the October 7 Hamas attack on southern Israel, which could become a dangerous precedent for what the future holds for Kashmir.

    Israel also recently announced its support for India’s right to “self-defence”.

    In addition, the rise in right-wing rhetoric increases the likelihood of Islamophobic attacks taking place against Kashmiris, as well as Muslims in India more broadly.

    Pathways to peace?

    Each war fought between India and Pakistan over Kashmir has ended with negotiations and treaties.

    Bilateral relations have been attempted numerous times over the years and would be a preferable option to increased escalation in the current conflict.

    Ultimately, it is the Kashmiris who suffer the most whenever tensions boil over between the two nuclear powers. As one young man recently said:

    My parents don’t allow me to step outside. Every time I get a call, I feel a wave of anxiety, fearing it might be the police.

    Kashmir might be a wonderland, a mini-Switzerland or a paradise for others, but for us, it is an open prison. Everyone lives in fear. What future do we have?

    Leoni Connah does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    – ref. ‘Everyone lives in fear’: trapped between two warring nuclear giants, the people of Kashmir continue to suffer – https://theconversation.com/everyone-lives-in-fear-trapped-between-two-warring-nuclear-giants-the-people-of-kashmir-continue-to-suffer-256085

    MIL OSI Analysis – EveningReport.nz –

  • MIL-Evening Report: Greens’ election hubris – how the minor party lost its way and now its leader

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Josh Holloway, Lecturer in Government in the College of Business, Government and Law, Flinders University

    The Greens’ federal election result has been widely condemned as a “disaster”.

    The party has been all but wiped out in the House of Representatives. It has lost three of its four members, including leader Adam Bandt, who has just conceded his once safe seat of Melbourne. This leaves the Brisbane electorate of Ryan as the Greens’ only remaining seat in the lower house.

    Yet the tired explanations being rolled out – the party is too extreme, too obstructionist, too distant from a mythical single-issue environmentalist past – misidentify the party’s dilemmas.

    And they overlook the fact the Greens’ influence will be greater in the new parliament, at least in the Senate.

    Under-delivering

    The Greens share the blame for the tone of these election post-mortems.

    This is a party of campaign hubris, consistently over-promising and under-delivering.

    Bob Brown’s “green government” is yet to emerge. Christine Milne’s aspirations of gains in the bush barely materialised. And the “small-l liberals” chased by Richard Di Natale now prop up independents.

    Bandt’s list of new target seats appears to have stretched resources too thin and underscored the challenges of taking a Senate party into the House.

    The campaign narrative of “keeping Dutton out and getting Labor to act” may have suited a time when either a Labor or Coalition minority government was a possibility. But it did little to distinguish the Greens as Labor gained momentum.

    Many voters may have thought kicking Peter Dutton out was best done by voting for Labor, backed up by supporting the Greens in the Senate to encourage more ambitious Labor action.

    National vote holds up

    And yet – is the election result all that bad?

    Despite a small negative swing, the Greens’ nationwide primary vote was still above 12%. This election sits alongside 2010 and 2022 as among the party’s largest ever share of votes.

    Support ticked up in seats as divergent as Lalor, Fraser, Macarthur, Barton, Newcastle, Page, Spence, and Swan. Even in divisions lost to Labor, such as Griffith and Brisbane, voters did not abandon the party in large numbers.


    aec.gov.au, CC BY

    The Greens will also maintain their Senate numbers. This gives them sole balance of power, making them pivotal to Labor’s legislative success.

    Clearly, if the Greens are too “extreme”, it’s an extremism shared by a significant and relatively stable share of Australians.

    Lower house obstacles

    So, what explains this mix of loss and achievement?

    The Greens routinely highlight the barriers of the lower house electoral system. They have a point. Single member districts tend not to produce a chamber that reflects primary vote share.

    Preferential voting can be a boon to minor parties. But it also makes the outcomes of tight, multiparty electoral contests – the kind the Greens relied on to win in 2022 – susceptible to even slight shifts in voters’ preferences.

    Given the Nationals and a slew of independents held their seats, this may read like a cop out.

    But unlike the Nationals, the Greens lack a clear geographic cleavage that corrals large numbers of electors their way. And contrary to vaguely centrist independents, the Greens occupy ideological space where most voters don’t reside – even if many of the Greens’ “social democratic” policy positions have broad support when considered individually.

    This is hardly new. The party is no more stridently left-wing than in 2022. But even in the country’s most progressive seats, there is always a conservative rump. If the Liberal Party is knocked out of a race, most of their preferences will flow to Labor, which can be decisive.

    Senate obstruction

    Much has been made of the Greens’ legislative obstruction in the Senate. Delaying Labor’s housing agenda is one such example.

    Dabbling in opposition before ultimately capitulating for minor concessions may have dampened Greens support.

    The Greens reaped neither the benefits of opposition nor those of compromise, but instead the costs of both. It’s hard to see crucial segments of voters in lower house seats not being repulsed by this, even as the party finds sufficient support to meet Senate quotas.

    Way forward

    The future requires serious internal reflection on who the party appeals to, and how.

    A new parliamentary strategy is needed to leverage Senate balance of power for progressive outcomes and electoral growth. Greens also need to navigate a relationship with the government that is seemingly hostile to the very existence of the party (has anyone mentioned the Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme yet?).

    With the loss of Bandt from parliament, the party’s leadership – spilled following an election, regardless of outcome – is now wide open.

    Who will lead the Greens now?

    Bandt’s replacement will need to balance electoral appeal with an ability to contain internal ructions that have diminished, not disappeared.

    Senator Larissa Waters ought to be a frontrunner. She has held leadership positions for 10 years and is popular, both electorally and internally. Crucially, she represents Queensland, a state where the Greens need to regain votes.

    Another option is Senator Nick McKim, who would return the party’s centre of gravity to Tasmania, and offer previous state party leadership experience.

    Another candidate could be Senator Sarah Hanson-Young, who has long held leadership aspirations.

    In a party where members are stridently advocating for greater say in leadership selection, the process could open up and be unpredictable.

    All is not lost

    The Greens do best when voters turn away from Labor.

    As the government advances an unambitious agenda of, at best, “thin labourism”, the number of disappointed and disaffected voters will grow.

    Even a modest swing against Labor at the next election puts several House seats back in play, alongside the Greens’ ongoing presence in the Senate.

    Josh Holloway does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    – ref. Greens’ election hubris – how the minor party lost its way and now its leader – https://theconversation.com/greens-election-hubris-how-the-minor-party-lost-its-way-and-now-its-leader-255954

    MIL OSI Analysis – EveningReport.nz –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Padilla, Moran Introduce Bipartisan Bill to Bolster U.S. STEM Leadership, Address Financial Insecurity for Graduate and Postdoctoral Researchers

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator Alex Padilla (D-Calif.)

    Padilla, Moran Introduce Bipartisan Bill to Bolster U.S. STEM Leadership, Address Financial Insecurity for Graduate and Postdoctoral Researchers

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — Today, U.S. Senators Alex Padilla (D-Calif.) and Jerry Moran (R-Kan.) introduced bipartisan legislation to bolster U.S. leadership in STEM by requiring federal research agencies to help address the financial insecurity crisis among graduate and postdoctoral researchers. The Relieving Economic Strain to Enhance American Resilience & Competitiveness in Higher Education & Research (RESEARCHER) Act would also commission studies to better understand the landscape of financial insecurity for these researchers and improve the STEM career pipeline.
    The scientific workforce is fueled by our graduate and postdoctoral researchers making groundbreaking discoveries and technological innovations that help protect American global competitiveness. However, these young researchers face significant financial stressors — including food insecurity, student loan debt, housing costs, and child care costs — that threaten to force many of them to drop out of the STEM pipeline entirely.
    In a 2023 “Postdoctoral Barriers to Success” survey, nearly 95 percent of postdoctoral researchers reported that their salary negatively affected their professional or personal lives, with 85 percent indicating that a lack of benefits was harming their careers. In California, the percentage of University of California graduate students facing food insecurity has increased dramatically in recent years, from 21 percent in 2021 to 35 percent in 2023.
    “As a mechanical engineer, I know a strong STEM workforce pipeline is essential to securing America’s global leadership and promoting lifesaving scientific and technological innovation. But rising costs of living and insufficient salaries are forcing graduate and postdoctoral researchers to look toward other careers,” said Senator Padilla. “The current system is unsustainable for researchers in California and across the country. Our bipartisan bill would help address and improve our understanding of the widespread challenges young researchers face — like food insecurity, student loan debt, health, housing, and child care — to support the researchers who will guide the future of our scientific enterprise.”
    “To remain globally competitive, it is critical that our nation is supporting and prioritizing STEM education and research,” said Senator Moran. “Recent reports demonstrate that financial insecurity is a major barrier for postdoctoral research. This legislation will help equip universities with the tools to better support the success of STEM students in higher education and encourage postdoctoral researchers to pursue a degree in the Midwest.”
    “Although a vital part of the scientific enterprise, graduate students and postdoctoral researchers have endured insufficient support to sustain their most basic needs while doing innovative science.  The Relieving Economic Strain to Enhance American Resilience and Competitiveness in Higher Education and Research, or RESEARCHER Act, is imperative to addressing these barriers. From increasing access to affordable housing, food and health care to addressing costs of caregiving for family members, this legislation seeks to standardize policies and guidance for the federal government agencies to examine as they provide financial support for the future STEM workforce. The University of California thanks Sen. Padilla for his leadership in introducing the RESEARCHER Act and encourages Congress to pass this important legislation quickly,” said UC Vice President for Research & Innovation Theresa A. Maldonado, Ph.D., P.E.
    “The California State University applauds the introduction of the RESEARCHER Act. Addressing the financial instability faced by graduate and postdoctoral researchers is critical to ensuring a strong and sustainable research workforce. This legislation is an important step toward creating equitable and supportive conditions for the next generation of innovators and scholars,” said Dr. Ganesh Raman, Assistant Vice Chancellor for Research at the California State University.
    “Fair compensation is the issue most frequently raised by postdoctoral researchers nationally,” said Thomas P. Kimbis, executive director and chief executive officer of the National Postdoctoral Association (NPA). “The NPA encourages passage of the RESEARCHER Act to increase understanding of the financial needs of postdocs and graduate students, including locality pay issues, and steps that can be taken to address them.”
    “Graduate students and postdocs are the future of the nation’s STEM workforce, yet we are failing to pay many a competitive, livable wage. The RESEARCHER Act is a first step towards ensuring a continued, thriving U.S. scientific enterprise in an increasingly competitive world,” said Jonathan A. Bagger, American Physical Society CEO.
    “AGU applauds the RESEARCHER Act for working to support our nation’s student and early career scientists.  Science needs us like never before with support and resources. By reducing the financial hardships for graduate and postdoctoral researchers, the bill will help increase participation in STEM fields and help build long-term American leadership and innovation in the sciences,” said American Geophysical Union.
    “Graduate students and postdoctoral researchers have long been the foundation of America’s standing as a global leader in science and technology—often while facing enormous financial uncertainty. The RESEARCHER Act is a vital step toward giving these researchers the stability they deserve to continue pushing the boundaries of knowledge and maintaining U.S. leadership in innovation,” said Michael Espinal and Braden Gilleland, Co-Chairs of Federal Affairs, MIT Graduate Student Council.
    Specifically, the RESEARCHER Act would:
    Require federal research agencies to implement policies to address the financial instability of graduate and postdoctoral researchers based on policy guidelines developed by the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy;
    Increase data collection on the financial instability of graduate and postdoctoral researchers by amending the CHIPS and Science Act and directing the National Science Foundation to award institutions of higher education and nonprofit organizations with grants to research the subject;
    Commission a National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine study on the status of graduate and postdoctoral researcher financial insecurity; and
    Direct the Government Accountability Office to report on the implementation of the guidelines enacted by federal research agencies and make recommendations to improve said guidelines.
    The RESEARCHER Act is endorsed by the American Physical Society, American Geophysical Union, American Mathematical Association, National Postdoctoral Association, Association for Women in Science, American Association of Immunologists, University of California, California State University, and the MIT Student Graduate Council.
    As a Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) mechanical engineering graduate and a Commissioner of the bipartisan National Security Commission on Emerging Biotechnology (NSCEB), Senator Padilla has worked to advance U.S. scientific and technological leadership. He recently introduced the bipartisan National Biotechnology Initiative Act of 2025 to set in motion a whole-of-government approach to advancing biotechnology for U.S. national security, economic productivity, and competitiveness. The bill followed the Commission’s release of their major report and action plan, urging Congressional action to protect U.S. national security by bringing the full weight of American innovation to improve and maintain U.S. global leadership in biotechnology.
    Senator Padilla also hosted students and advocates last year to reintroduce the Basic Assistance for Students in College (BASIC) Act, bicameral legislation to help ensure college and university students can better meet their basic needs while pursuing higher education.
    A one-pager on the bill is available here.
    Full text of the bill is available here.

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-Evening Report: What is a blood cholesterol ratio? And what should yours be?

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Clare Collins, Laureate Professor in Nutrition and Dietetics, University of Newcastle

    Shutterstock

    Have you had a blood test to check your cholesterol level? These check the different blood fat components:

    • total cholesterol
    • LDL (low-density lipoprotein), which is sometimes called “bad cholesterol”
    • HDL (high-density lipoprotein), which is sometimes called “good cholesterol”
    • triglycerides.

    Your clinician then compares your test results to normal ranges – and may use ratios to compare different types of cholesterol.

    High blood cholesterol is a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease. This is a broad term that includes disease of blood vessels throughout the body, arteries in the heart (known as coronary heart disease), heart failure, heart valve conditions, arrhythmia and stroke.

    So what does cholesterol do? And what does it mean to have a healthy cholesterol ratio?

    What are blood fats?

    Cholesterol is a waxy type of fat made in the liver and gut, with a small amount of pre-formed cholesterol coming from food.

    Cholesterol is found in all cell membranes, contributing to their structure and function. Your body uses cholesterol to make vitamin D, bile acid, and hormones, including oestrogen, testosterone, cortisol and aldosterone.

    When there is too much cholesterol in your blood, it gets deposited into artery walls, making them hard and narrow. This process is called atherosclerosis.

    High blood cholesterol is a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease.
    Halfpoint/Shutterstock

    Cholesterol is packaged with triglycerides (the most common type of fat in the body) and specific “apo” proteins into “lipo-proteins” as a package called “very-low-density” lipoproteins (VLDLs).

    These are transported via the blood to body tissue in a form called low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol.

    Excess cholesterol can be transported back to the liver by high-density lipoprotein, the HDL, for removal from circulation.

    Another less talked about blood fat is Lipoprotein-a, or Lp(a). This is determined by your genetics and not influenced by lifestyle factors. About one in five (20%) of Australians are carriers.

    Having a high Lp(a) level is an independent cardiovascular disease risk factor.

    Knowing your numbers

    Your blood fat levels are affected by both modifiable factors:

    • dietary intake
    • physical activity
    • alcohol
    • smoking
    • weight status.

    And non-modifiable factors:

    • age
    • sex
    • family history.



    Read more:
    Got high cholesterol? Here are five foods to eat and avoid

    What are cholesterol ratios?

    Cholesterol ratios are sometimes used to provide more detail on the balance between different types of blood fats and to evaluate risk of developing heart disease.

    Commonly used ratios include:

    1. Total cholesterol to HDL ratio

    This ratio is used in Australia to assess risk of heart disease. It’s calculated by dividing your total cholesterol number by your HDL (good) cholesterol number.

    A higher ratio (greater than 5) is associated with a higher risk of heart disease, whereas a lower ratio is associated with a lower risk of heart disease.

    A study of 32,000 Americans over eight years found adults who had either very high, or very low, total cholesterol/HDL ratios were at 26% and 18% greater risk of death from any cause during the study period.

    Those with a ratio of greater than 4.2 had a 13% higher risk of death from heart disease than those with a ratio lower than 4.2.

    2. Non-HDL cholesterol to HDL cholesterol ratio (NHHR)

    Non-HDL cholesterol is the total cholesterol minus HDL. Non-HDL cholesterol includes all blood fats such as LDL, triglycerides, Lp(a) and others. This ratio is abbreviated as NHHR.

    This ratio has been used more recently because it compares the ratio of “bad” blood fats that can contribute to atherosclerosis (hardening and narrowing of the arteries) to “good” or anti-atherogenic blood fats (HDL).

    Non-HDL cholesterol is a stronger predictor of cardiovascular disease risk than LDL alone, while HDL is associated with lower cardiovascular disease risk.

    Because this ratio removes the “good” cholesterol from the non-HDL part of the ratio, it is not penalising those people who have really high amounts of “good” HDL that make up their total cholesterol, which the first ratio does.

    Research has suggested this ratio may be a stronger predictor of atherosclerosis in women than men, however more research is needed.

    Another study followed more than 10,000 adults with type 2 diabetes from the United States and Canada for about five years. The researchers found that for each unit increase in the ratio, there was around a 12% increased risk of having a heart attack, stroke or death.

    They identified a risk threshold of 6.28 or above, after adjusting for other risk factors. Anyone with a ratio greater than this is at very high risk and would require management to lower their risk of heart disease.

    The greater this ratio, the greater the chance of having a heart attack or stroke.
    Alex Yeung/Shutterstock

    3. LDL-to-HDL cholesterol ratio

    LDL/HDL is calculated by dividing your LDL cholesterol number by the HDL number. This gives a ratio of “bad” to “good” cholesterol.

    A lower ratio (ideal is less than 2.0) is associated with a lower risk of heart disease.

    While there is lesser focus on LDL/HDL, these ratios have been shown to be predictors of occurrence and severity of heart attacks in patients presenting with chest pain.



    Read more:
    Health Check: five food tips that could save your life after a heart attack

    If you’re worried about your cholesterol levels or cardiovascular disease risk factors and are aged 45 and over (or over 30 for First Nations people), consider seeing your GP for a Medicare-rebated Heart Health Check.

    Clare Collins AO is a Laureate Professor in Nutrition and Dietetics at the University of Newcastle, NSW and a Hunter Medical Research Institute (HMRI) affiliated researcher. She is a National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Leadership Fellow and has received research grants from NHMRC, ARC, MRFF, HMRI, Diabetes Australia, Heart Foundation, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, nib foundation, Rijk Zwaan Australia, WA Dept. Health, Meat and Livestock Australia, and Greater Charitable Foundation. She has consulted to SHINE Australia, Novo Nordisk, Quality Bakers, the Sax Institute, Dietitians Australia and the ABC. She was a team member conducting systematic reviews to inform the 2013 Australian Dietary Guidelines update, the Heart Foundation evidence reviews on meat and dietary patterns and current Co-Chair of the Guidelines Development Advisory Committee for Clinical Practice Guidelines for Treatment of Obesity.

    Erin Clarke is a Postdoctoral Fellow at the University of Newcastle, and an affiliated researcher with Hunter Medical Research Institute (HMRI). She is also an Accredited Practising Dietitian working in private practice. She is currently supported by L/Prof Clare Collins’ National Health and Medical Research Council Leadership Fellowship. She has received funding from the New South Wales Ministry of Health, University of Newcastle, HMRI, Hunter New England Health and has an industry grant with Honeysuckle Health Pty Limited. She also holds positions on the Nutrition Society of Australia Council as Co-Chair of the Newcastle Regional Group, she is an early career representative for the HMRI Food and Nutrition Research Program and the University of Newcastle College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing ECR Research Sub-Committee. She is also a member of the Nutrition Society of Australia Precision and Personalised Nutrition Special Interest Group and the NSW Cardiovascular Research Network.

    – ref. What is a blood cholesterol ratio? And what should yours be? – https://theconversation.com/what-is-a-blood-cholesterol-ratio-and-what-should-yours-be-253126

    MIL OSI Analysis – EveningReport.nz –

  • MIL-Evening Report: ‘These violations should never have occurred’: the troubled history of intercountry adoption

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Samara Kim, PhD Candidate & Researcher, Southern Cross University

    Korean adoptees worldwide are grappling with a devastating possibility: they were not truly orphans, but may have been made into orphans.

    For decades, adoptees were told they were “abandoned”, “rescued” or “unwanted”. Many were told their Korean families were too “poor” or “incapable” to raise them – and they should only ever feel grateful for being adopted.

    But these long-held stories are now under scrutiny.

    Our recent research interrogates the narratives that have obscured the darker realities of intercountry adoption. Rather than viewing adoption solely through the lens of “rescue”, our work examines the broader power structures that facilitated the mass migration of Korean children to western countries, including Australia.

    South Korea’s reckoning with its adoption history

    In March, South Korea’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission released its preliminary findings after collecting records and testimony from a coalition of overseas Korean adoptee-led organisations (including the Australia–US Korean Rights Group).

    The preliminary report revealed a disturbing pattern of human rights violations in the country’s adoption industry, including:

    • forced relinquishments
    • falsified records
    • babies switched at adoption
    • inadequate screening processes, and
    • deep-rooted institutional corruption.

    The commission’s chair described finding

    serious violations of the rights of adoptees, their biological parents – particularly Korean single mothers – and others involved. These violations should never have occurred.

    The commission is expected to release its final report soon, but due to the upcoming presidential election and political uncertainty in South Korea, the timeline remains unclear.

    Chilling cases

    This is not the first time intercountry adoption has made headlines for irregularities, human rights abuses, or illicit and illegal practices.

    While Australia was expanding the number of children for intercountry adoption from South Korea in the 1980s, Park In-keun – director of South Korea’s infamous Brothers Home, an illegal detention facility that sent children overseas for adoption – was arrested for embezzlement and illegal confinement.

    He was ultimately acquitted of the most serious charges in South Korea before escaping to Australia. He was then charged again in 2014 for embezzlement, including government subsidies and wages of inmates forced into slave labour in South Korea. He died two years later.

    Other allegations of human rights violations and abuses came to light around the same time with the arrest of Julie Chu.

    She was accused of facilitating a “baby export” syndicate. Children were believed to have been kidnapped from Taiwan to send to Western countries, including Australia, in the 1970s and 80s. She was convicted of forgery, but denied being involved in trafficking.

    Since then, other cases have continued to emerge involving countries such as Chile, Sri Lanka, India, Ethiopia and Guatemala.

    What is the adoption industrial complex?

    Intercountry adoption is not just a social practice. It’s also an economic and political system sometimes known as the transnational adoption industrial complex.

    This network of organisations, institutions, government policies and financial systems created a globalised adoption economy worth billions of dollars. According to numerous investigations, Western nations, as “receiving” countries, drove the demand for the continuous sourcing of children.

    As Park Geon-Tae, a senior investigator with South Korea’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission, said:

    To put it simply, there was supply because there was demand.

    Australia received an estimated 3,600 Korean children from the 1970s to the present, as part of more than 10,000 intercountry adoptions.

    Prospective parents typically paid between US$4,500 and $5,000 to facilitate acquiring a child in Australia in the 1980s, equivalent to A$21,000 today.

    Since colonisation, Australia has had a long and painful history of child removal. From the Stolen Generations involving First Nations children to the forced adoption of children born to unwed mothers, child separation has been deeply embedded in the nation’s social policy.

    While national apologies have acknowledged the irreparable harms caused by these policies, the same ideologies and structures were repurposed as the blueprint for intercountry adoption.

    In recent years, other western nations, such as Denmark, Norway, the Netherlands, Sweden and Switzerland, have begun to investigate their own roles in the intercountry adoption industry. These nations have either suspended their adoption programs, issued formal apologies or launched formal investigations.

    Thus far, Australia and the United States have not.

    Challenging the ‘rescue’ myth

    Intercountry adoption has long been framed as a humanitarian act. The central idea was that children needed “rescuing” and any life in a Western country would be “better” than one with their families in their home country.

    Many adoptees and their original families were expected to just move on or be grateful for being “saved”.

    However, research shows this gratitude narrative disregards the deep trauma caused by forced separation.

    Studies have reported that adoptees experience lifelong ruptures due to cultural, familial and ancestral displacement. Forced assimilation makes reconnection with family and culture complex or nearly impossible.

    Many intercountry adoptees have also voiced concerns about abuse, violence and mistreatment in adoptive homes.

    Questioning the ‘orphan crisis’ myth

    The myth of a global orphan crisis has also been a powerful driver of intercountry adoption.

    Adoption groups often reference outdated UNICEF estimates that there are 150 million orphans globally. However, this figure obscures the fact most of the children classified as “orphans” are children of single parents, or children currently living in homes with extended family or other caregivers.

    This was the case in South Korea. Most children sent for adoption were not true orphans, but children who had at least one parent or extended family they could have stayed with if they were adequately supported.

    The belief that millions of children of single parents were “orphans” in need of “rescue” was used to justify calls for faster, less regulated adoptions.

    Labelling these children as “orphans” also helped attract millions of dollars in philanthropic donations. However, donors were rarely interested in supporting children to stay with their families and communities in their home countries.

    Instead, the focus was often on removing and migrating them for the purpose of intercountry adoption.

    The question then emerges: was this about finding families for babies or finding babies for Western families?

    Samara Kim is a founding member of KADS Connect, an advocacy organisation for South Korean adoptees.

    Kathomi Gatwiri and Lynne McPherson do not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and have disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    – ref. ‘These violations should never have occurred’: the troubled history of intercountry adoption – https://theconversation.com/these-violations-should-never-have-occurred-the-troubled-history-of-intercountry-adoption-254200

    MIL OSI Analysis – EveningReport.nz –

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: PM’s Science Prizes celebrate excellence

    Source: NZ Music Month takes to the streets

    Some of New Zealand’s most outstanding scientific minds have been recognised at the 2024 Prime Minister’s Science Prizes Award Ceremony, held this evening in Wellington.

    Prime Minister Christopher Luxon praised the winners, acknowledging the crucial role that science plays in building a more productive, innovative, and sustainable New Zealand.

    “This year’s top honour, the Prime Minister’s Science Prize, has been awarded to Dr Linda Johnson and the Endophyte Discovery Team at AgResearch,” Christopher Luxon says. 

    “Their groundbreaking work to improve the health and productivity of ryegrass is making a tangible difference for New Zealand farmers, boosting yields while reducing reliance on pesticides.”

    Ryegrass is the most commonly used pasture grass in New Zealand agriculture. The team’s research has led to the development of beneficial microorganisms that protect grass from pests and disease, while also enhancing drought resistance.

    “This is an excellent example of science delivering real-world solutions.

    “By improving the quality of pasture on our farms, we’re not only increasing our capacity to produce high-quality food, but we’re also supporting the growth of our economy and ensuring a more resilient future for our agricultural sector.”

    The Prime Minister’s Science Prizes comprise five prestigious awards, with a total prize pool of $975,000. The 2024 recipients include:

    • Dr Olivia Harrison, University of Otago – awarded the MacDiarmid Emerging Scientist Prize for her multidisciplinary work in understanding and managing anxiety.
    • Dr Aiden Kiely, Aorere College, Auckland – awarded the Science Teacher Prize for his dedication to equity and excellence in science education.
    • Professor Jemma Geoghegan, University of Otago – awarded the Science Communication Prize for advancing public understanding of infectious diseases and guiding policy responses to pandemic threats in New Zealand and the Pacific.
    • Rena Misra, Epsom Girls’ Grammar School – awarded the Future Scientist Prize for her innovative research into using fungi to improve stormwater filtration systems.

    “Congratulations to all this year’s winners. Your achievements are a testament to the power of Kiwi ingenuity and scientific excellence,” Mr Luxon says. 

    “Your work is not only advancing knowledge—it’s improving lives and building a better New Zealand for future generations.”

    The five prizes are: 

    The Prime Minister’s Science Prize

    An individual or team for a transformative scientific discovery or achievement, which has had a significant economic, health, social and/or environmental impact on New Zealand and/or internationally. The total value of this prize is $500,000. $100,000 goes towards the team, and $400,000 will be used to support the ongoing research.

    The Prime Minister’s MacDiarmid Emerging Scientist Prize

    An outstanding emerging scientist who has had their PhD or equivalent qualification conferred within the last eight years i.e. (no earlier than 1 January 2014). The total value of the Prize is $200,000. $50,000 is for the winner, and $150,000 for their ongoing research. 

    The Prime Minister’s Science Teacher Prize

    A registered teacher kaiako who has been teaching science, mathematics, technology, pūtaiao, hangarau or pāngarau learning areas of the New Zealand curriculum to school-age children in a primary, intermediate or secondary New Zealand registered school or kura kaupapa. The total value of this prize is $150,000. The winner can use $50,000 at their own discretion. The winner’s school will receive $100,000 which must be used for the development of science in their school.

    The Prime Minister’s Science Communication Prize

    A practising scientist who can demonstrate an interest, passion and aptitude for science communication and public engagement, or to a person who has developed expertise in public engagement, or communication of complex scientific or technological information to the public and/or science and research communities. The total value of the Prize is $75,000. $55,000 of the Prize money is to be used to support the recipient to carry out a programme of activities/professional development to further their understanding of science communication.  $20,000 is for the winner.

    The Prime Minister’s Future Scientist Prize

    Awarded to a Year 12 or Year 13 school tauira student for outstanding achievement in carrying out a practical and innovative science research, maths, technology or engineering project. This Prize is valued at $50,000 and is to be used to support the winner’s tertiary education.

    MIL OSI New Zealand News –

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: PM’s Science Council to set direction for science

    Source: NZ Music Month takes to the streets

    Prime Minister Christopher Luxon has today announced the new Prime Minister’s Chief Science Advisor, and the members of the Prime Minister’s Science and Technology Advisory Council.

    “We have world-class scientists in our universities and research institutes, but they’re working in a system held back by outdated settings. To unlock the full potential of science and technology, we need a sharper focus on commercialisation, better access to global investment, and clearer priorities at home,” Mr Luxon says. 

    “This Council is a new initiative to get clear, independent advice to ensure our investments in science and technology are delivering real outcomes for New Zealanders.

    “The Council will provide advice on long-term priorities for government-funded science and innovation. They will help identify areas of focus that will have the greatest benefit for Kiwis and our economy. 

    “I also expect them to provide bold and courageous advice about those areas that aren’t delivering value for New Zealanders and may need to be deprioritised. It’s about making sure we are investing in what will have the greatest impact for New Zealanders.”

    Members of the Council bring a strong mix of scientific, commercial and strategic expertise. They include:

    Sir Peter Gluckman
    Craig Piggott
    Professor Merryn Tawhai
    Komal Mistry-Mehta
    Malcolm Johns
    Dr John Roche

    “I am also pleased to announce that Dr John Roche has been appointed as the Prime Minister’s Chief Science Advisor. In this role, John will support robust decision making by providing high quality, independent scientific advice. John, in his capacity as my science advisor, will also be a member of the council.”

    Minister for Science, Innovation and Technology, Hon Dr Shane Reti, will chair the Council, with Dr John Roche as deputy chair.

    “These are highly capable individuals who understand both the science and the economic imperatives. They are prepared to make the bold calls needed to ensure the system is future-focused, outcome-driven and aligned with our economic goals,” Mr Luxon says.

    “A strong, well-directed science and innovation sector is critical to lifting productivity, creating high-value jobs and supporting a more resilient and competitive economy.”

    The Council will provide its first formal advice to the Prime Minister and Minister Reti later this year.

    Biographies of Council members:

    Sir Peter Gluckman 
    Professor Sir Peter Gluckman ONZ KNZM FRSNZ FMedSci FRS trained as a paediatrician and biomedical scientist. He is Director of Koi Tu- Centre for Informed Futures and holds a Distinguished University Professorship at the University of Auckland. He is currently the chair of the Science System Advisory Group. Sir Peter is President of the International Science Council (ISC, 2021-2026). From 2014-2021 he was the inaugural Chair of the International Network of Government Science Advice (INGSA), and from 2009-2018 he was the first Chief Science Advisor to the Prime Minister of New Zealand. He was also Science Envoy for the New Zealand Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade and coordinated the secretariat of the Small Advanced Economies Initiative. He has written and spoken extensively on science-policy and science-diplomacy and science-society interactions. He has received the highest scientific and civilian honours in New Zealand and numerous international scientific awards. 
    Craig Piggott
    Craig Piggott is the founder of Halter. The company’s solar-powered collar for dairy and beef cows, pairs with an app for farmers and allows cows to respond to guidance cues, enabling virtual herding and fencing while monitoring health 24/7. This innovation helps farmers increase milk and protein production propelling the company to become one of New Zealand’s fastest-growing businesses with a thriving international customer base. Craig brings experience in innovation, agriculture and business.  
    Merryn Tawhai
    Merryn Tawhai graduated from the University of Auckland with a PhD in Engineering Science in 2001. She leads a research programme at the Auckland Bioengineering Institute (ABI) in applied computational physiology of the respiratory system. Merryn is the Director of the ABI and sits on the Board of Directors for Cure Kids Ventures and the Virtual Physiological Human Institute. She was ABI’s Deputy Director for 10 years, Director of the Medical Technologies Centre of Research Excellence (MedTech CoRE), and an independent Director for Izon Science. Merryn was awarded the 2016 MacDiarmid Medal by the Royal Society of New Zealand (RSNZ) Te Apārangi, is a Fellow of the RSNZ, a Fellow of IAMBE and AIMBE, and an elected member of the Fleischner Society.
    Komal Mistry-Mehta
    Komal is Chief Innovation & Brand Officer at Fonterra and Managing Director of the Ki Tua Fund, Fonterra’s corporate venture capital arm. She leads global innovation, research and development, digital, brand and marketing functions for New Zealand’s largest company. Prior to joining the Fonterra Executive Team, Komal led Fonterra’s global health and nutrition business based in Singapore. With experience across Asia, the America’s and Europe, she has led major transformations in sales, innovation, digital enablement and technology. Komal was named New Zealand’s Young Executive of the Year in 2017 and serves on several international boards. Komal has completed the Executive Program at Stanford University School of Business and holds Bachelor of Laws and Bachelor of Management degrees from the University of Waikato. She is a Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand as well as a member of the New Zealand Institute of Chartered Accountants.
    Malcolm Johns
    Malcolm is the Chief Executive of Genesis Energy. Previously he was the Chief Executive of InterCity Group and held several governance roles within New Zealand’s transport, infrastructure and tourism sectors. He is Convenor of the Climate Leaders Coalition and served as Chair of the APEC Business Advisory Council leading the regional trade policy task force for climate change. Malcolm has extensive business acumen and understanding of Government systems

    John Roche 
    John was appointed MPI’s Chief Science Adviser in June 2018 to provide an independent science perspective. He leads MPI’s Science Forum, chairs the Science Governance Group at MPI and the independent Mycoplasma bovis Strategic Science Advisory Group. John is also a member of the Prime Minister’s Chief Science Adviser’s forum and is an adjunct professor in University of Auckland’s School of Biological Sciences. John was previously DairyNZ’s Principal Scientist for Animal Science. He has held science appointments in Ireland and Australia. He is also Managing Director of Down to Earth Advice Ltd. Widely published and a regular contributor to international science and farming conferences, John has an Honours degree in Agricultural Science, a Masters in Farm Systems and Pasture Management, and a PhD in Animal Nutrition.

    MIL OSI New Zealand News –

  • MIL-Evening Report: Inadmissible evidence: why a routine traffic stop and police photo went all the way to the Supreme Court

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Alexandra Allen-Franks, Senior Lecturer, Law School, University of Auckland, Waipapa Taumata Rau

    sebra/Shutterstock

    A recent Supreme Court decision could have far reaching consequences on how police can use photographs as evidence.

    The central question in Mahia Tamiefuna v The King was whether a photo taken by a police officer on a public road during a routine traffic stop could be used to convict a person of an unrelated crime.

    According to the decision, which became public this week, the answer is no. And there are clear and compelling reasons why a majority of the court made this call.

    The Tamiefuna case

    The Tamiefuna case started with a traffic stop by a police officer in 2019. Finding the driver was unlicensed, the officer impounded the car and the occupants had to get out.

    While they were standing on the road, the officer took pictures of them with his phone and uploaded the images to the national intelligence database.

    The photo of Tamiefuna matched CCTV footage taken three days earlier after an aggravated robbery. At the time of the robbery, police weren’t able to identify Tamiefuna because his face was obscured.

    But after the photo was uploaded to the database, police realised the clothing Tamiefuna was wearing in the photo matched the clothing from the aggravated robbery. The photo became a key piece of evidence linking him to that case and resulted in a conviction of aggravated robbery.

    His appeal against the conviction was dismissed before the case came before the Supreme Court, where a majority of the court agreed with his arguments.

    The court found the taking of the photo was unlawful and unreasonable because the officer wasn’t investigating any specific crime when he took it. Uploading the photo to the database and keeping it there was also unlawful and unreasonable.

    If the officer had been investigating a specific crime, there is a legal framework that would have allowed the taking of photos and other information by police.

    The impropriety in taking and retaining the photo was such that the court said it should have been excluded from Tamiefuna’s trial under section 30 of the Evidence Act 2006. The Crown has subsequently said it would not seek a retrial of Tamiefuna due to insufficient evidence. He is a free man.

    The majority of New Zealand’s Supreme Court found photos taken by police during a routine traffic stop could not be used to convict a person for an unrelated crime.
    Hagen Hopkins/Getty Images

    Improperly obtained evidence

    Under the Evidence Act, a judge must decide whether to exclude evidence from the trial if a court finds it was obtained improperly. That decision is made by balancing whether exclusion would be “proportionate to the wrongdoing”.

    In making that decision, the judge has to take account of “the need for an effective and credible system of justice”. If the evidence is excluded, the judge may be depriving the jury of relevant material which could help them determine what truly happened.

    As such, we need a strong justification for why it may be right to keep evidence out of a trial.

    In my view, there are two compelling justifications for what happened in Tamiefuna’s case. The first is called the “rights thesis”: the idea that we should exclude evidence if it has been obtained in breach of a defendant’s rights.

    The logic is that if parliament declares we have a right, it should be taken seriously. And there should be consequences for violating a person’s rights. When evidence is obtained through breaching a person’s rights, the most appropriate remedy is the exclusion of the evidence.

    For Tamiefuna, the evidence was obtained in breach of his right to be free from unreasonable search and seizure under section 21 of the Bill of Rights Act. With the rights thesis, we return a person back to the position they would have been in had the breach not happened.

    Protecting the integrity of the justice system

    The other justification is that we should exclude evidence if we need to uphold the integrity of the justice system (the “integrity principle”).

    Courts need the ability to exclude improperly obtained evidence, because integrity as a rule-of-law concept requires our courts to act coherently. By this logic, they shouldn’t ignore wrongdoing in the obtaining of evidence.

    The court shouldn’t condone illegal actions by state actors such as the police, while condemning some other conduct by finding someone guilty of crime. It matters if evidence is obtained in breach of a right.

    In circumstances where parliament has marked out certain rights by including them in the Bill of Rights Act, relying on evidence obtained in breach of such rights raises serious integrity concerns.

    The best way for the court to show it’s acting with integrity would be to approach this sort of evidence by presuming it should be excluded.

    This may mean that “the criminal is to go free because the constable has blundered”, as American judge Benjamin Cardazo once complained. But that is a consequence we have to accept to be sure we have an effective and credible system of justice.

    Tamiefuna’s case will likely lead to greater guidance for police around the taking of pictures so the same thing doesn’t happen in the future.

    Some people might baulk at Tamiefuna going free, but it’s the right decision overall.

    Alexandra Allen-Franks does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    – ref. Inadmissible evidence: why a routine traffic stop and police photo went all the way to the Supreme Court – https://theconversation.com/inadmissible-evidence-why-a-routine-traffic-stop-and-police-photo-went-all-the-way-to-the-supreme-court-256203

    MIL OSI Analysis – EveningReport.nz –

  • MIL-Evening Report: ER Report: A Roundup of Significant Articles on EveningReport.nz for May 8, 2025

    ER Report: Here is a summary of significant articles published on EveningReport.nz on May 8, 2025.

    Women’s sports are fighting an uphill battle against our social media algorithms
    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Hans Westerbeek, Professor of International Sport Business, Head of Sport Business Insights Group, Victoria University Women’s sport is more and more getting the attention it deserves. Stadiums are filling, television ratings for many sports are climbing and athletes such as the Matildas’ Mary Fowler, triple Olympic gold

    New taxes on super didn’t get much attention in the election campaign. But they could be tricky to implement
    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Mark Melatos, Associate Professor of Economics, University of Sydney Poetra.RH/Shutterstock The re-election of the Albanese government has led to renewed concern about planned changes to the taxation of investment returns in superannuation funds. Labor’s emphatic victory on Saturday night, including what looks like an increased presence in

    New Caledonia’s political talks – no outcome after three days of ‘conclave’
    By Patrick Decloitre, RNZ Pacific correspondent French Pacific Desk After three solid days of talks in retreat mode, New Caledonia’s political parties have yet to reach an agreement on the French Pacific territory’s future status. The talks, held with French Minister for Overseas Manuel Valls and French Prime Minister’s special advisor Eric Thiers, have since

    Forest home of ‘polar dinosaurs’ 120 million years ago in southern Australia recreated in detail for the first time
    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Vera Korasidis, Lecturer in Environmental Geoscience, The University of Melbourne Artwork © Bob Nicholls 2024 Roughly 140 million to 100 million years ago, the piece of land that is modern day Australia was located much further south on Earth. In fact, what is now Victoria was once

    Ovarian cysts can be painful when they burst. When do you need to see a doctor?
    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Anna Chruścik, Lecturer in Biomedical Sciences, University of Southern Queensland PeopleImages.com – Yuri A/Shutterstock Cysts are small pockets of fluid that form inside the body. Ovarian cysts are common, affecting around one in ten women. But sometimes they can cause pain – especially when they burst. You

    Keith Rankin Chart Analysis – International Trade over time: gifts with strings
    Analysis by Keith Rankin. The ‘see-saw’ chart above shows the accumulated ‘excess benefits’ that Aotearoa New Zealand, and a few other countries, have enjoyed from international trade over the last 40 years. These are benefits arising from ‘unbalanced trade’ which are in addition to the regular benefits – arising from efficient specialisation – of ‘balanced’

    ‘Utu’ as foreign policy: how a Māori worldview can make sense of a shifting world order
    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Nicholas Ross Smith, Senior Research Fellow, National Centre for Research on Europe, University of Canterbury Getty Images There is a growing feeling in New Zealand that the regional geopolitical situation is becoming less stable and more conflicted. China has ramped up its Pacific engagement, most recently with

    While the Liberals haemorrhaged, the Nationals held their own. Is it time to break up the Coalition?
    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Linda Botterill, Visiting Fellow, Crawford School of Public Policy, Australian National University Among the notable features of this year’s election campaign was that Australia’s second-oldest political party was apparently missing in action. At the same time, it managed to avoid the rout inflicted on its coalition partner.

    Why is hospital parking so expensive? Two economics researchers explain
    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Lisa Farrell, Professor of Economics (Health Economist), RMIT University ThirtyPlus/Shutterstock Imagine having to pay A$39 dollars a day to park your car while visiting your sick child in hospital. For families already struggling in a cost-of-living crisis, hospital parking fees are not just another expense. They can

    Vietnam is poised to become a top 20 economy, so why is Australia taking so long to make trade and investment links?
    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Anne Vo, Senior lecturer in Vietnamese culture and politics, University of Wollongong Aritra Deb/Shutterstock At a time of widespread global trade instability, Australia should be expanding and diversifying its economic partnerships. Supply chains remain fragile, and protectionist rhetoric is once again gaining traction in major Western economies.

    Marvel’s Thunderbolts* shines a light on men’s mental illness – but falls down with this outdated plotline
    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Emily Baulch, Research Associate, Discipline of Media and Communications, University of Sydney Marvel Studios This piece contains spoilers. Marvel’s men are sad. And that’s a good thing. Thor’s depressed in Avengers: Endgame. Tony Stark has panic attacks in Iron Man 3. Peter grieves in Spider-Man: No Way

    Australia is set to be a renewables nation. After Labor’s win, there’s no turning back
    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Wesley Morgan, Research Associate, Institute for Climate Risk and Response, UNSW Sydney bmphotographer/Shutterstock An emphatic election victory for the incumbent Labor government means Australia’s rapid shift to renewable energy will continue. As Climate Change and Energy Minister Chris Bowen said on Saturday: In 2022, the Australian people

    Financial Times: The West’s shameful silence on Gaza – do more to restrain Benjamin Netanyahu
    EDITORIAL: The Financial Times editorial board After 19 months of conflict that has killed tens of thousands of Palestinians and drawn accusations of war crimes against Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu is once more preparing to escalate Israel’s offensive in Gaza. The latest plan puts Israel on course for full occupation of the Palestinian territory and would

    ‘Under no illusions’ about France, says author of new Rainbow Warrior book
    Pacific Media Watch The author of the book Eyes of Fire, one of the countless publications on the Rainbow Warrior bombing almost 40 years ago but the only one by somebody actually on board the bombed ship, says he was under no illusions that France was behind the attack. Journalist David Robie was speaking last

    Australia doesn’t have a federal Human Rights Act – but the election clears the way for overdue reform
    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Amy Maguire, Professor in Human Rights and International Law, University of Newcastle Master1305/Shutterstock The Albanese government has achieved an historic re-election, substantially building its majority in the House of Representatives. Much has already been written about the potential for a more ambitious legislative program on the back

    Samoa down in RSF media freedom world ranking due to ‘authoritarian pressure’
    Talamua Online News Samoa has dropped in its media and information freedom world ranking from 22 in 2024 to 44 in 2025 in the latest World Press Freedom Index compiled annually by the Paris-based Reporters Without Borders (RSF). For the Pacific region, New Zealand is ranked highest at 16, Australia at 29, Fiji at 40,

    How maximum security prison inmates and officers worked together to create a farm behind bars
    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Christian Tietz, Senior Lecturer in Industrial Design, UNSW Sydney Macquarie Correctional Centre Media Unit At Macquarie Correctional Centre in western New South Wales, a story of collaboration and persistence is unfolding. Inmates and prison officers are farming commercial quantities of fresh food in a purpose-built indoor facility.

    Can what you eat during pregnancy and breastfeeding affect whether your child develops food allergies?
    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Jennifer Koplin, Evidence and Translation Lead, National Allergy Centre of Excellence; Chief Investigator, Centre of Food Allergy Research; Associate Professor and Group Leader, Childhood Allergy & Epidemiology Group, Child Health Research Centre, The University of Queensland Maria Evseyeva/Shutterstock Many questions pop up when you’re growing or raising

    How do you put a tariff on movies? Here’s what Trump’s plan could mean for Australia
    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Mark David Ryan, Professor, Film, Screen, Animation, Queensland University of Technology Kirk Wester/Shutterstock US President Donald Trump’s recent announcement of a plan to impose a 100% tariff on movies “produced in foreign lands” could have a massive impact on the global entertainment industry. Film and television production

    Labor says its second term will be about productivity reform. These ideas could help shift the dial
    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Roy Green, Emeritus Professor of Innovation, University of Technology Sydney Summit Art Creations/Shutterstock In his victory speech, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese highlighted social policy as a major factor in Labor’s electoral success, particularly Medicare, housing and cost of living relief. He was justified in doing so. But

    MIL OSI Analysis – EveningReport.nz –

  • MIL-OSI Russia: Poll: 86% of respondents rate China’s digital innovation highly

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: People’s Republic of China in Russian – People’s Republic of China in Russian –

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    BEIJING, May 8 (Xinhua) — Eighty-six percent of respondents rated China’s achievements in digital technology highly, according to a report released Wednesday by the Renmin University of China (RUC) in Beijing.

    The Global Digital Perceptions Report 2025, conducted by the university’s Global Opinion Research Centre, surveyed 7,599 participants from 38 countries using an international online sample.

    The report covers five key areas, including improvements in daily life brought by digital technologies, expectations and concerns about artificial intelligence (AI), and the growing acceptance of China’s digital technologies in the Global South.

    Regional analysis shows that the highest approval rates for Chinese digital technologies are in Africa at 94.3 percent, South America at 93 percent, Southeast Asia at 91.1 percent, South Asia and Central Asia at 90.7 percent, and the Middle East at 88.1 percent.

    According to the report, more than half of respondents consider artificial intelligence and e-commerce to be the leading digital sectors in China. E-commerce platforms such as Temu and SHEIN are rapidly expanding globally due to their competitive prices and efficient supply chains.

    Meanwhile, Chinese AI companies are making rapid progress with open and dynamic development strategies. In regions such as Africa, Chinese AI is increasingly seen as a driving force for intelligent infrastructure and digital governance.

    “Chinese tech companies are widely known as leaders in digital innovation. Earlier this year, the DeepSeek R1 demonstrated high performance with minimal computing resources. Tencent’s Hunyuan and Alibaba’s Qwen large language models also ranked among the leaders in the tests. Meanwhile, Alipay and WeChat Pay continue to expand globally, providing users with convenient payment solutions,” said Zhang Di, a professor at NUS’s School of Journalism and Communication.

    The report also noted that 83.6 percent of respondents from the Global South view Chinese digital technology as a positive force in their countries. Cooperation in technology, infrastructure, and talent development is strengthening, supporting both the internationalization of Chinese tech companies and digital growth in these countries.

    Globally, attitudes toward innovation differ significantly between developing and developed countries: 74.2 percent of people in developing countries closely follow global technology trends, compared with only 50.5 percent in developed countries.

    The survey found that 62.7 percent of respondents believe AI has a positive impact on work efficiency, while 64.9 percent see benefits in student learning. However, only 34.9 percent expressed optimism about AI’s impact on employment opportunities. -0-

    MIL OSI Russia News –

  • MIL-Evening Report: New taxes on super didn’t get much attention in the election campaign. But they could be tricky to implement

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Mark Melatos, Associate Professor of Economics, University of Sydney

    Poetra.RH/Shutterstock

    The re-election of the Albanese government has led to renewed concern about planned changes to the taxation of investment returns in superannuation funds.

    Labor’s emphatic victory on Saturday night, including what looks like an increased presence in the Senate, suggests the legislation is likely to become law in the near future.

    Retirement income in Australia

    Australia’s retirement income system comprises two pillars: a government-funded age pension as well as private superannuation.

    Super includes compulsory employer-funded contributions as well as additional personal contributions.

    These two pillars are complementary; a person can receive a pension even if they have private super. But the more super they have, the less pension they are eligible for.

    About 70% of superannuation assets are held in Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA)-regulated funds and 25% are held in self-managed super funds (SMSFs).

    There are two types of tax – and tax concessions – on super. First, employer contributions and capped personal contributions are taxed at a concessional rate of 15%. Second, income earned by a super fund is taxed at 15% for balances in the accumulation phase (when contributions are being made). Income earned in the pension phase is tax-free.

    So what does the proposed reform entail?

    Starting July 1, the government proposes to increase the concessional tax rate on super account earnings in the accumulation phase from 15% to 30% for balances above A$3 million.

    Those affected – about 80,000 super account holders, or 0.5% of the total – will continue to benefit from the existing 15% concessional tax rate on earnings on the first $3 million of their super balance.

    They will also be able to carry forward any loss as an offset against their tax liability in future years.

    The proposed increase in taxes would affect about 80,000 account holders.
    Fizkes/Shutterstock

    Concerns with the proposed reform

    Concerns have been raised this reform implies the taxation of unrealised capital gains on assets held in super accounts, such as shares or property, even if they have not been sold.

    This is, indeed, a significant departure from the status quo. Both APRA-regulated funds and SMSFs are currently only required to pay capital gains tax once the asset is sold and the gain is crystallised.

    The move to tax unrealised capital gains is likely to prove particularly onerous for SMSFs. The typical industry super fund has a diversified portfolio of assets of varying liquidity, including significant cash holdings. But SMSF portfolios are often dominated by a large and illiquid asset (ones that cannot be easily sold and converted into cash) such as a farm or business property.

    As a result, an SMSF facing a large unrealised capital gain, say from an increase in property values, may not have sufficient cash flow to pay the associated tax bill. The SMSF trustee might be forced to prematurely sell assets to meet the fund’s tax liability.

    In the United States, President Joe Biden’s 2025 budget included a similar proposal to tax unrealised capital gains for households with more than US$100 million in wealth.

    Purpose of the proposed reform

    In announcing this initiative, Treasurer Jim Chalmers suggested the motivation was two-fold.

    First, the federal government is facing pressure on the budget bottom line and generous tax concessions for super are becoming expensive.

    Second, current super tax concessions are highly regressive. This means most benefits of the concessions flow to the wealthiest households which, in any case, will not be eligible for the pension.

    The cost of current super concessions to the federal budget is about $50 billion in foregone revenue, according to Treasury. That is almost the cost of the age pension.

    The Grattan Institute argues superannuation has become a “taxpayer-funded inheritance scheme”. A Treasury review found most Australians die with large outstanding super balances.

    The Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia Retirement Standard calculates that, for a comfortable retirement, a couple needs a super balance of about $700,000 if they retire at age 67. The $3 million threshold is out of the ballpark. However, if the threshold is not indexed more people will be affected over time.

    So, is this reform useful?

    According to the government’s Retirement Income Review, the objective of Australia’s super system should be to “deliver adequate standards of living in retirement in an equitable, sustainable and cohesive way”.

    While the proposed tax change aims to improve the equity and sustainability of Australia’s super system, it is not clear how it will work in practice.

    In response to SMSF concerns about the difficulty in paying tax bills, the government’s proposal gives taxpayers 84 days to pay the tax liability instead of the usual 21 days. This hardly mitigates the risk that SMSF trustees may have to liquidate the main asset in their fund.

    The Biden proposal had presented an alternative model, allowing for the tax liability to be paid over several years, not all at once. Alternatively, taxpayers could pay an interest-like charge while deferring their unrealised capital gains tax liability.

    Such alternatives do not appear to have been seriously considered in the Australian government’s proposal.

    Ultimately, though, the question must be asked: is taxing volatile unrealised capital gains really the most effective way to improve equity in, and the sustainability of, the superannuation system?

    Mark Melatos does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    – ref. New taxes on super didn’t get much attention in the election campaign. But they could be tricky to implement – https://theconversation.com/new-taxes-on-super-didnt-get-much-attention-in-the-election-campaign-but-they-could-be-tricky-to-implement-255871

    MIL OSI Analysis – EveningReport.nz –

  • MIL-Evening Report: Women’s sports are fighting an uphill battle against our social media algorithms

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Hans Westerbeek, Professor of International Sport Business, Head of Sport Business Insights Group, Victoria University

    Women’s sport is more and more getting the attention it deserves.

    Stadiums are filling, television ratings for many sports are climbing and athletes such as the Matildas’ Mary Fowler, triple Olympic gold medallist Jess Fox and star cricketer Ellyse Perry are becoming household names.

    Despite this progress, an invisible threat looms, one that risks undoing years of advocacy and momentum.

    That threat is the algorithm.

    How sports consumption is changing

    As more fans consume sport through digital platforms such as YouTube, TikTok, Instagram and increasingly, AI-curated streaming services such as WSC Sports, the content they see is being selected not by editors but by artificial intelligence (AI).

    Algorithms, trained to maximise engagement and profits, are deciding what appears in your feed, which video auto-plays next, and which highlights are pushed to the top of your screen.

    But here is the problem: algorithms prioritise content that is already popular.

    That usually means men’s sport.

    This creates what researchers call an echo chamber effect, where users are shown more of what they already engage with and less of what they don’t.

    In sport, this can be deeply problematic.

    If a user clicks on highlights from the AFL men’s competition for example, the algorithm will respond by serving up more men’s footy content.

    Over time, content from women’s competitions risks being squeezed out, not because it is unworthy but because it has not yet achieved the same levels of engagement.

    This is not a glitch, it is a structural flaw in how digital platforms are designed to serve content.

    It means women’s sport, already underrepresented in traditional media, risks becoming all but invisible to many users in this AI-driven ecosystem.

    Also, generative AI tools such as ChatGPT, Sora and others don’t just curate content, they now create it.

    Match reports, fan commentary, video summaries and social posts are being generated by machines. But these systems are trained on historical data, which overwhelmingly favours men’s sport.

    So, the more content the algorithm generates, the more it reproduces the same imbalance. What was once human bias is now being automated and scaled across millions of screens.

    This may sound abstract, but it has real-world consequences.

    Young fans raised on algorithmically curated content are less likely to see women’s sport unless they actively search for it. And if they don’t see it, they don’t form emotional attachments to it.

    That has major implications for ticket sales, merchandise, viewership and sponsorship investment.

    An uphill battle

    In short, visibility drives viability. If women’s sport becomes digitally invisible, it risks becoming financially unsustainable.

    A 2024 study in Victoria shows only around 15% of traditional sports media coverage in the state goes to women’s sport. This mirrors a 2019 European Union study across 22 countries, which found 85% of print media coverage is dedicated to male athletes.

    And while progress has been made, particularly during events such as the FIFA Women’s World Cup or the Olympics, regular, everyday visibility remains an uphill battle.

    AI threatens to compound these historic disparities. A 2024 study found algorithms trained on historical data reproduce and even amplify gender bias.

    The very systems that could democratise access to sport content may, in fact, be reinforcing old inequalities.

    What can be done?

    We can’t turn off the algorithm. But we can hold it to account.

    Platforms like YouTube, TikTok and Netflix should be required to undergo independent algorithmic audits.

    These would evaluate whether content recommendation engines are systemically under-representing women’s sport and propose changes.

    In Europe, the Artificial Intelligence Act, one of the world’s first comprehensive AI regulations, requires transparency and oversight for high-risk AI applications. Australia and other countries should consider similar obligations for content platforms.

    Sport organisations and broadcasters need to create intentional pathways for fans to discover women’s sport, even if they haven’t previously engaged with it.

    That means curated playlists, featured stories and digital campaigns that surface content outside the fan’s usual algorithmic bubble.

    Platforms must balance personalisation with diversity.

    We also need better media literacy, especially for younger audiences. Fans should be encouraged to explore beyond what’s served to them, seek out women’s sport channels, and recognise when the algorithm is reinforcing narrow viewing habits.

    Teaching this in schools, sport clubs and community programs could make a big difference.

    An opportunity for Australia

    Australia is well placed to lead this change because our women’s national teams are globally competitive, our domestic leagues are growing and fan appetite is rising.

    But without visibility, this momentum can fade. We must remember that algorithms don’t just reflect our preferences, they shape them.

    In an age where AI can dictate what we see, the battle for attention becomes even more crucial.

    If we want women’s sport to thrive every week, we need to ensure it is seen, heard and valued in the digital spaces where fandom now lives.

    Because in the age of AI, what we don’t see may be just as powerful as what we do.

    Hans Westerbeek does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    – ref. Women’s sports are fighting an uphill battle against our social media algorithms – https://theconversation.com/womens-sports-are-fighting-an-uphill-battle-against-our-social-media-algorithms-255001

    MIL OSI Analysis – EveningReport.nz –

  • MIL-OSI Submissions: Haiti – MSF trauma hospital in Port-au-Prince nears its limits as fighting intensifies in Haiti’s capital

    Source: Médecins Sans Frontières/Doctors Without Borders (MSF)

    Port-au-Prince, May 6, 2025 – Port-au-Prince is undergoing extremely high level of violence as armed groups are coordinating attacks on several areas of the city that were previously beyond their control.

    Plagued by years of political instability and an alarming humanitarian situation, Haiti has been experiencing a new upsurge in violence since mid-February as armed groups, united in a single coalition, attempt to increase their control of Port-au-Prince. Fighting is intensifying and the front lines are shifting, squeezing the last remaining districts of the capital.

    Médecins Sans Frontières/Doctors Without Borders (MSF) is warning that its Tabarre trauma hospital – one of the last in the capital is nearing the limits of its capacity. This would create an even more desperate situation for the city’s residents, whose access to surgical care would be considerably reduced.

    MSF’s Tabarre hospital is under great pressure, having already increased its capacity by half. The hospital is strained by the growing number of seriously injured people requiring treatment. Although the number of trauma beds is officially 50, the hospital regularly has over 70 trauma patients. Beyond the 75-patient limit, it will be virtually impossible to accept new cases.

    “The number of seriously injured patients has risen steadily over the past four weeks. Nearly 40% of them are women and children,” said Dr Seybou Diarra, coordinator of MSF’s Tabarre hospital. “We’re already overloaded, and we can’t push the walls. We are now creating hospital rooms in the meeting rooms. The medical teams are exhausted, and the intensification of violence around the hospital complicates the conduct of our activities, as we are located next to areas that are regularly under attack, with a high risk of stray bullets.”

    In this unprecedented context, where over 60% of health facilities in Port-au-Prince are closed or non-functional according to the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, those that remain open are facing severe shortages of human resources, equipment and specialized services. In just one month, the number of hospitals able to treat trauma cases has fallen from four to two.The Mirebalais University Hospital, one of the last hospitals capable of providing trauma care, suspended its activities on April 23 due to insecurity in the area, as it is located on a road now controlled by armed groups. MSF had to suspend its activities at its trauma center in Carrefour, following a security incident in March, while the Hôpital Universitaire de la Paix, which remains open, is overloaded.

    “It’s becoming increasingly difficult for Haitians to access health facilities, and nearly impossible for those requiring trauma care,” explains Dr Diarra. “If the situation doesn’t calm down, I fear that many of the wounded will die for lack of available treatment.”

    MSF calls for the protection of civilians and respect for health facilities in combat zones.

    For over 30 years, MSF has been responding to the urgent medical needs of vulnerable populations in Haiti. In 2024, our teams carried out more than 72,000 consultations, treated 31,500 emergencies,performed 7,400 surgical procedures and assisted 1,300 births. Located in the most vulnerable areas of Port-au-Prince and beyond, we provide essential care, particularly in trauma, maternal health, sexual and reproductive health, and support for survivors of sexual violence.

    MSF is an international, medical, humanitarian organisation that delivers medical care to people in need, regardless of their origin, religion, or political affiliation. MSF has been working in Haiti for over 30 years, offering general healthcare, trauma care, burn wound care, maternity care, and care for survivors of sexual violence. MSF Australia was established in 1995 and is one of 24 international MSF sections committed to delivering medical humanitarian assistance to people in crisis. In 2022, more than 120 project staff from Australia and New Zealand worked with MSF on assignment overseas. MSF delivers medical care based on need alone and operates independently of government, religion or economic influence and irrespective of race, religion or gender. For more information visit msf.org.au  

    MIL OSI – Submitted News –

  • MIL-OSI China: Why historical truth of WWII should never be distorted

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    Aircraft fly in formation over Red Square during a rehearsal for the Victory Day military parade, which marks the 80th anniversary of the Victory in the Great Patriotic War, in Moscow, Russia, May 5, 2025. (Xinhua/Zhai Jianlan)

    This year marks the 80th anniversary of victory in World War II (WWII). Chinese President Xi Jinping travels to Russia on Wednesday for a state visit and celebrations marking the 80th anniversary of the Victory in the Soviet Union’s Great Patriotic War.

    The commemoration stands as a powerful reminder of the brutality of war, the precious hard-won peace and stability, and the importance of historical truth — especially at a time when the world is grappling with a resurgence in unilateralism, economic coercion and hegemonic mentality.

    What is alarming is that in recent years, there have been repeated attempts to distort or deny the legacy of the WWII victory. These attempts, drawing widespread criticism and concern, have reminded the world of the necessity to safeguard the integrity of the history of WWII.

    WHO IS DISTORTING WWII HISTORY?

    In these years, politicians from certain countries have sought to achieve political gains by manipulating historical truth.

    “We are witnessing increasing efforts to rehabilitate Nazism and racial supremacy, glorify Nazis and their collaborators, and revive practices of racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance,” Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova told Xinhua in a recent interview.

    In March, U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, while attending a memorial service on Iwo Jima to honor those who died in one of WWII’s pivotal battles, claimed Japan as being indispensable in tackling “Chinese aggression” and complimented the “valor” of Japanese soldiers.

    Hegseth’s remarks sparked sharp criticism, with many viewing them as an attempt to whitewash Japan’s militarism during WWII. His comments were also seen as a betrayal of those who sacrificed their lives in anti-fascist fight.

    Such attempts to distort or deny the history of the World Anti-Fascist War are not new.

    After WWII, as the Cold War between the United States and the Soviet Union intensified, Washington chose to support Japan as a strategic counterweight in Asia. In doing so, the remnants of Japanese fascism were not fully eradicated.

    Until this day, some right-wing Japanese politicians still refuse to renounce Japan’s militaristic past, and even question or deny the outcomes of the war.

    They continue to pay tribute to the notorious Yasukuni Shrine, which honors 14 convicted Class-A Japanese WWII war criminals, revise high school history textbooks to downplay Japan’s wartime atrocities, and deny the forced recruitment of “comfort women” by the Japanese military during WWII.

    “In recent years, Japan has recklessly tampered with textbooks, and the theory of no guilt for aggression has a relatively large market in Japan,” said Sun Huixiu, an associate professor with the School of History at Beijing Normal University.

    Similar historic revisionism took place in the West. There have been attempts by some Western countries to downplay or even completely deny the role of the Red Army and the Soviet people in the victory over Nazism.

    A survey conducted by IFOP, an international market research group, in May 1945 showed that 57 percent of French people credited the Soviet Union with having made the greatest contribution to Nazi defeat, compared to just 20 percent backing the United States and 12 percent Britain.

    However, by 2018, a YouGov survey showed a dramatic shift in public perception: 56 percent of the French believed the United States played the most important role, 11 percent credited Britain, and only 15 percent recognized Russia’s contribution.

    WHY HISTORICAL TRUTH SO IMPORTANT?

    During the deadliest military conflict in human history 80 years ago, more than 80 countries and regions, involving roughly 2 billion people, were drawn into the war. More than 100 million worldwide were killed or wounded, and global economic losses exceeded 4 trillion U.S. dollars.

    To resist fascist aggression, more than 50 countries, including China and the Soviet Union, formed a united front. As the main theater in the East during the World Anti-Fascist War, China paid a heavy price — over 35 million casualties in its fight against the majority troops of Japanese militarism.

    A woman visits the site used to be a bacterial laboratory at the former site of the Unit 731 in Harbin, northeast China’s Heilongjiang Province, Dec. 13, 2024. (Xinhua/Xie Jianfei)

    Preserving the truth of history is the most meaningful tribute to the soldiers and civilians who perished during WWII. It is also a foundation for reconciliation between former belligerent nations.

    “How should we respond to the sin of the Holocaust for which we should take responsibility? Summing up the past can be a prerequisite to reconciliation,” said former German Chancellor Angela Merkel during her visit to Japan in 2015.

    More importantly, as noted by Xi at the general debate of the 70th session of the UN General Assembly back in 2015, history is a mirror, and only by drawing lessons from history can the world avoid repeating past calamities.

    After WWII, the Allied powers carried out the Nuremberg and Tokyo Trials, which marked the first time in human history that war criminals were prosecuted before an international tribunal, delivering rightful punishment, upholding international justice and sending a powerful warning to fascist forces.

    Based on the WWII victory, key members of the anti-fascist alliance jointly initiated the founding of the United Nations and formulated a series of important international documents including the Cairo Declaration, the Potsdam Proclamation and the Charter of the United Nations, which laid the foundation for the modern international order and established the basic norms governing contemporary international relations.

    “These instruments helped to hold fascist crimes accountable, and through a series of institutional frameworks, effectively placed a ‘security lock’ on the postwar world to help preserve peace,” said He Lei, former vice president of the Academy of Military Science of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army, in an article.

    Since the end of WWII, the world has witnessed a level of global prosperity unprecedented in human history thanks to the largely peaceful era it has been in. “We need to firmly remember the history of WWII and maintain the world political and economic order,” said Sun.

    “Today, it seems no one disputes that the victory over fascism and militarism was one of humanity’s greatest achievements in the 20th century,” said Kirill Babayev, director of the Institute of China and Modern Asia at the Russian Academy of Sciences.

    This underscores that Russia and China must remain at the forefront of preserving this memory, he noted.

    “In the global agenda, we must uphold a position that demands full respect for historical truth, rejects its distortion, and, above all, safeguards the memory of those who perished during World War II while defending our freedom,” he added.

    MIL OSI China News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: NASA Statement on Nomination of Matt Anderson for Deputy Administrator

    Source: NASA

    Acting NASA Administrator Janet Petro issued the following statement regarding the nomination by President Donald Trump of Matt Anderson Wednesday to serve as the agency’s deputy administrator:
    “As a retired United States Air Force colonel and executive of the Space Force Association, Matt Anderson brings extensive knowledge of space operations, aeronautics expertise, and industry experience. If confirmed, he would join NASA’s leadership team at a time when partnerships and a sharpened focus on mission are essential to our continued success. Along with President Trump’s nominee to lead NASA, Jared Isaacman, he will strengthen collaboration across sectors and help NASA advance exploration, serve the American people, and deliver results for the benefit of all.”
    Throughout his over 24-year tenure in the U.S. Air Force, Anderson culminated his career as the U.S. Transportation Command’s senior liaison officer to North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD), U.S. Northern Command (USNORTHCOM), and U.S. Space Command (USSPACECOM). He retired as a colonel Oct. 1, 2021. Anderson is currently a vice president and Space Force & Air Force client executive at CACI. He also serves as the chief growth officer at the Space Force Association.
    An alum of the U.S. Air Force Academy, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, and the University of Colorado at Colorado Springs, Anderson holds degrees in biology, aeronautical science, and leadership & counseling. In 2024, Anderson was named by the Washington Exec as one of their “Top Space Execs to Watch.”
    For more about NASA’s mission, visit:

    Home Page

    -end-
    Bethany Stevens / Amber JacobsonHeadquarters, Washington202-358-1600bethany.c.stevens@nasa.gov / amber.c.jacobson@nasa.gov

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Governor Newsom announces judicial appointments 5.7.25

    Source: US State of California 2

    May 7, 2025

    SACRAMENTO – Governor Gavin Newsom today announced his nomination of three Court of Appeal Justices: Associate Justice Helen Zukin as Presiding Justice of the Second District Court of Appeal, Division Four, Judge Mark Hanasono as Associate Justice of the Second District Court of Appeal, Division Three, and, pending confirmation of Justice Helen Zukin to the role of Presiding Justice, Judge Armen Tamzarian as Associate Justice of the Second District Court of Appeal, Division Four. 

    The Governor also announced his appointment of 12 Superior Court Judges: one in Fresno County; five in Los Angeles County; one in Orange County; one in Sacramento County; one in San Diego County; one in Santa Barbara County; one in Santa Clara County; and one in Ventura County.

    Second District Court of Appeal

    Associate Justice Helen Zukin, of Los Angeles County, has been nominated to serve as Presiding Justice of the Second District Court of Appeal, Division Four. She has served as an Associate Justice in Division Four since 2023. She served as a Judge in the Los Angeles County Superior Court from 2018 to 2023. Justice Zukin was a partner at Kiesel Law LLP from 2006 to 2018. She worked as a Solo Practitioner at the Law Offices of Helen E. Zukin from 1995 to 2006. She was a partner at Simke, Chodos, Silberfeld & Anteau, Inc. from 1990 to 1995. Justice Zukin worked as an associate at Greene, O’Reilly, Agnew & Broillet from 1985 to 1990. Justice Zukin received a Juris Doctor degree from Loyola Law School. She fills the vacancy created by the retirement of Presiding Justice Brian Currey. This position requires confirmation by the Commission on Judicial Appointments, which consists of Chief Justice Patricia Guerrero, Attorney General Rob Bonta, and Senior Presiding Justice Arthur Gilbert. Justice Zukin is a Democrat.

    Judge Mark Hanasono, of Los Angeles County, has been nominated to serve as an Associate Justice of the Second District Court of Appeal, Division Three. He has served as a Judge in the Los Angeles County Superior Court since 2013. Judge Hanasono served as a Deputy Alternate Public Defender at the Los Angeles County Alternate Public Defender’s Office from 2004 to 2013. He was a Deputy Public Defender at the Los Angeles County Public Defender’s Office from 2000 to 2004. He was a Judicial Law Clerk in the District of Columbia Superior Court from 1999 to 2000. Judge Hanasono received a Juris Doctor degree from Georgetown University. He fills the vacancy created by the retirement of Justice Luis A. Lavin. This position requires confirmation by the Commission on Judicial Appointments, which consists of Chief Justice Patricia Guerrero, Attorney General Rob Bonta, and Senior Presiding Justice Arthur Gilbert. Judge Hanasono is a Democrat.

    Judge Armen Tamzarian, of Los Angeles County, has been nominated to serve as an Associate Justice of the Second District Court of Appeal, Division Four. He has served as a Judge in the Los Angeles County Superior Court since 2013. Judge Tamzarian was a lead appellate court attorney at the Second District Court of Appeal, Division Three from 2008 to 2013. He was an associate and later a partner at Case, Knowlson, Jordan & Wright LLP from 1997 to 2008. He was a research attorney at the Los Angeles Superior Court from 1996 to 1997. Judge Tamzarian received a Juris Doctor degree from Southwestern Law School. Pending her confirmation, he will fill the vacancy created by the elevation of Justice Helen Zukin to Presiding Justice. This position requires confirmation by the Commission on Judicial Appointments, which consists of Chief Justice Patricia Guerrero, Attorney General Rob Bonta, and Senior Presiding Justice Arthur Gilbert. Judge Tamzarian is a Democrat.

    The compensation for each of these positions is $280,052.
     

    Fresno County Superior Court

    Melissa Baloian, of Fresno County, has been appointed to serve as a Judge in the Fresno County Superior Court. Baloian has worked as a Solo Practitioner since 2023. She was a Supervising Attorney at The Matian Firm from 2022 to 2023. She worked as a Solo Practitioner at the Law Office of Melissa Baloian from 2011 to 2022. Baloian served as a Deputy District Attorney at the Madera County District Attorney’s Office in 2011. She worked as a Deputy District Attorney at the Fresno County District Attorney’s Office from 2007 to 2010. Baloian served as a Deputy City Attorney at the Fresno City Attorney’s Office from 2006 to 2007. She served as a Deputy Public Defender at the Fresno County Public Defender’s Office from 2004 to 2006. Baloian received a Juris Doctor degree from the University of San Francisco, School of Law. She fills the vacancy created by the retirement of Judge Adolfo Corona. Baloian is registered as no party preference. 

    Los Angeles County Superior Court

    Syna Dennis, of Los Angeles County, has been appointed to serve as a Judge in the Los Angeles County Superior Court. Dennis has served as a Commissioner in the Los Angeles Superior Court since 2023. She has served in various roles at the Los Angeles County Counsel Office including as a Principal Deputy County Counsel from 2005 to 2023 and a Senior Deputy County Counsel from 1999 to 2005. She worked as an Associate Attorney at the Law Offices of Atkins and Evans from 1989 to 1999. Dennis received a Juris Doctor degree from the University of California, Berkeley School of Law. She fills the vacancy created by the retirement of Judge Harvey A. Silberman. Dennis is a Democrat.

    Hoa Hoang, of Los Angeles County, has been appointed to serve as a Judge in the Los Angeles County Superior Court. Hoang has served as a Lead Appellate Court Attorney at the Second District Court of Appeal, Division Seven since 2018. Hoang served in various roles at the Second District Court of Appeals, including as a Senior Appellate Court Attorney from 2017 to 2018 and an Appellate Court Attorney from 2011 to 2017. Hoang worked as an Associate for Hogan Lovells US LLP from 2002 to 2010. She served as a Law Clerk at the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California from 2000 to 2002. Hoang received a Juris Doctor degree from UCLA School of Law. She fills the vacancy created by the appointment of Judge Michelle W. Court to the Federal Court. Hoang is a Democrat.

    Lara Bazán, of Los Angeles County, has been appointed to serve as a Judge in the Los Angeles County Superior Court. Bazán has served as a Deputy District Attorney at the Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office since 2012. She worked as an Associate at Jones Day from 2008 to 2012. Bazán received a Juris Doctor degree from the University of Southern California School of Law. She fills the vacancy created by the elevation of Justice Michelle C. Kim to the Court of Appeal. Bazán is a Democrat.

    Brenda C. Robinson, of Los Angeles County, has been appointed to serve as a Judge in the Los Angeles County Superior Court. Robinson has worked as a Senior Attorney at the Children’s Law Center of California since 2015. She served as a Senior Policy Deputy for the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors from 2013 to 2014. Robinson worked at the Children’s Law Center as a Supervising Attorney from 2007 to 2012 and as a Staff Attorney from 2001 to 2007. Robinson was a Partner at Robinson, Wright, and Newsom from 1998 to 2001. Robinson received a Juris Doctor degree from Golden Gate University School of Law. She fills the vacancy created by the elevation of Justice Anne K. Richardson to the Court of Appeal. Robinson is a Democrat. 

    Maria Jhai, of Los Angeles County, has been appointed to serve as a Judge in the Los Angeles Superior Court. Jhai has served as an Assistant United States Attorney at the Office of the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Central District of California since 2019. She worked as an Attorney for Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP from 2014 to 2019. Jhai held a temporary position as a Deputy City Attorney at the Office of the Los Angeles City Attorney in 2017. She served as a Law Clerk at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit from 2013 to 2014. Jhai served as a Law Clerk for the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan from 2011 to 2013. Jhai received a Juris Doctor degree from the University of Michigan Law School. She fills the vacancy created by the retirement of Judge Douglas W. Sortino. Jhai is a Democrat.

    Orange County Superior Court

    Michael Mooney, of Orange County, has been appointed to serve as a Judge in the Orange County Superior Court. Mooney has served as a Senior Deputy Public Defender at the Orange County Public Defender since 2012. He worked as an Attorney at the Law Office of Thomas Johnson from 2011 to 2012. Mooney received a Juris Doctor degree from McGeorge School of Law. He fills the vacancy created by the retirement of Judge Julian W. Bailey. Mooney is a Democrat. 
     

    Sacramento County Superior Court

    Martin Tejeda, of Yolo County, has been appointed to serve as a Judge in the Sacramento County Superior Court. Tejeda has served as a Commissioner at the Sacramento County Superior Court since 2023. He was a Sole Practitioner at the Law Offices of Martin Tejeda from 2005 to 2023 and an Associate at Kring and Chung from 2004 to 2005. Tejeda served as a Deputy Public Defender at the Sacramento Public Defender’s Office from 2001 to 2004 and as an attorney at the Law Office of James Kuppenbender from 2000 to 2001. Tejeda  received a Juris Doctor degree from McGeorge School of Law. He fills the vacancy created by the appointment of Judge Dena Coggins to the Federal Court. Tejeda is a Democrat.
     

    San Diego County Superior Court

    Jihan Maloney, of San Diego County, has been appointed to serve as a Judge in the San Diego County Superior Court. Maloney has served as a Deputy District Attorney at the San Diego County District Attorney’s Office since 2011. She received a Juris Doctor degree from California Western School of Law. She fills the vacancy created by the retirement of Judge David Gill. Jihan is registered as no party preference.
     

    Santa Barbara County Superior Court

    Teresa Martinez, of Santa Barbara County, has been appointed to serve as a Judge in the Santa Barbara County Superior Court. Martinez has served as Senior Deputy County Counsel at the Santa Barbara County Counsel’s Office since 2018. She was an Associate at Buynak, Fauver, Archbald & Spray LLP from 2017 to 2018. Martinez was a Solo Practitioner at Teresa Martinez Law from 2016 to 2017. She worked at California Rural Legal Assistance in various roles including Directing Attorney from 2013 to 2016 and staff attorney from 2012 to 2013. Martinez was a contract attorney at the Legal Aid Foundation of Santa Barbara County from 2011 to 2012. She received a Juris Doctor degree from Cincinnati College of Law. She fills the vacancy created by the retirement of Judge Jean M. Dandona. Martinez is a Democrat.

    Santa Clara County Superior Court

    Christopher Van Meir, of Santa Clara County, has been appointed to serve as a Judge in the Santa Clara County Superior Court. Van Meir has served as a Deputy Public Defender at the Santa Clara County Public Defender’s Office since 2018. He served  as a Deputy Public Defender at the Monterey County Public Defender’s Office from 2013 to 2018 and as a Deputy Public Defender at the Placer County Public Defender’s Office from 2006 to 2013. Van Meir received a Juris Doctor degree from the University of California, Berkeley School of Law. He fills the vacancy created by the retirement of Judge Jacquiline M. Arroyo. Van Meir is a Democrat.
     

    Ventura County Superior Court

    Carol Hubner, of Ventura County, has been appointed to serve as a Judge in the Ventura County Superior Court. Hubner has served as a Commissioner at the Ventura County Superior Court since 2024. She served as a Commissioner at the Santa Barbara County Superior Court from 2022 to 2024. She was a Managing Partner at Kelly & Hubner, LLP from 2005 to 2022 and a Deputy County Counsel at the Santa Barbara Office of the County Counsel from 2001 to 2005. Hubner worked as an Associate at Hunt & Associates from 2000 to 2001 and as an Associate at Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP from 1998 to 2000. Hubner served as a Staff Attorney at the Legal Aid Society of San Mateo County from 1998 to 2000. She worked as a Law Clerk at the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in 1998. Hubner received a Juris Doctor degree from Santa Clara University School of Law. She fills the vacancy created by the retirement of Judge Nancy L. Ayers. Hubner is a Democrat.

    The compensation for each of these positions is $244,727.

    Press Releases, Recent News

    Recent news

    May 7, 2025

    News What you need to know: California and 16 other states today filed a federal lawsuit accusing President Trump of unlawfully withholding billions of dollars approved by bipartisan majorities in Congress for electric vehicle charging infrastructure that would reduce…

    May 7, 2025

    News What you need to know: Despite the Trump Administration’s assaults, both California and Texas are working to build high-speed rail. But only one state has built anything: California. SACRAMENTO — What’s the main difference between California high-speed rail and…

    May 7, 2025

    News What you need to know: A new report details nearly $33 billion raised for climate projects and direct support for Californians funded by cap-and-trade, as Governor Gavin Newsom and legislative leaders seek an extension of the program. SACRAMENTO – Governor Gavin…

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI Submissions: New Book – Modernising Islam? The Limits of Liberal Reforms in Muslim Nations – by Rumy Hasan

    Source: MTP.Agency a book by Rumy Hasan

    Modernising Islam? The Limits of Liberal Reforms in Muslim Nations explores the complex and often fraught attempts at modernisation in Muslim-majority countries. From Saudi Arabia’s ambitious Vision 2030 to the UAE’s drive for economic diversification, and from Turkey’s reversal of Atatürk’s secular reforms to Tunisia’s struggles post-Arab Spring, this book critically examines the challenges of reconciling liberal reforms with deeply entrenched religious and political structures.

    Author Rumy Hasan provides a thought-provoking analysis of whether these reforms represent genuine progress or merely superficial adjustments to maintain power. Drawing on historical context and contemporary developments, he explores key issues, including the role of Sharia law, the status of women, freedom of expression, and the relationship between Islam and democracy.

    With in-depth case studies spanning the Gulf states, North Africa, Southeast Asia, and Central Asia, this book questions whether meaningful change is possible in societies where religion remains deeply intertwined with governance. It also considers whether Saudi Arabia’s recent reformist rhetoric could set a precedent for the wider Islamic world—or whether entrenched theological doctrines will continue to limit progress.

    A compelling and incisive read, this book is essential for anyone interested in global politics, Middle Eastern affairs, and the intersection of religion and modernity.

    This book is instructive, precise and very well documented. Taking in consideration different Islamic countries, it explains how difficult the reformation of Islam is. And when reforms have been adopted, there remains always the danger of cancelling them, as happened with Turkey after Atatürk’s death.

    – Prof Sami Aldeeb, Director, Centre of Arab and Islamic Law, St Sulpice, Switzerland

    Rumy Hasan approaches difficult issues in the Muslim world with a sharp intellect and penetrating analysis.

    – Sir Alan Duncan, former UK Foreign Minister

    Paperback (236 pages) £9.99; $13.25; Ebook £3.99; $4.50
    Michael Terence Publishing, 2025;
    ISBN-139781800949836; 9781805880196
    ASIN: ‏B0F4FLKJKN

    Available now from book outlets and distributors worldwide.
     
    About the Author
    Rumy Hasan is Associate Professor at SPRU, University of Sussex and a Visiting Professorial Research Fellow at Civitas. His previous books include Multiculturalism: Some Inconvenient Truths; Dangerous Liaisons: The Clash between Islamism and Zionism; Religion and Development in the Global South; and Modern Europe and the Enlightenment.

    MIL OSI – Submitted News –

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Police announce more details for training in Auckland

    Source: New Zealand Police

    Police has officially signed a long-term lease in Auckland so that training courses can begin in our biggest city next month.

    “We are thrilled we have signed an agreement with Te Kunenga ki Pūrehuroa Massey University for space at their Ōtehā Auckland campus,” says Deputy Commissioner Jill Rogers. 

    “We have worked closely with Massey over the past couple of months to deliver an agreement that meet our needs and works for the University as well.

    “As part of the agreement Police has exclusive use of part of the campus, which includes multiple classrooms with capacity to seat up to 155 people, a locker room, storage space, offices, and car parks. We will also have access to gym and recreation areas, and we have a small number of dorm rooms allocated for Police staff.

    “These are high quality facilities and will be a great environment for police officers to learn and develop in.

    “Extensive planning and organisation are essential to delivering training at the new Auckland training base. We are already onsite working to get everything up and running for a range of Police courses.

    “This training space in Auckland is pivotal for running our senior courses and continuing to free up space at the Royal New Zealand Police College (RNZPC) for recruit training. Upskilling and developing our officers is an important part of maintaining a highly capable workforce to keep our communities safe.

    “This space will also enable the Tāmaki Makaurau recruit Wing 390 to start on 30 June. Wing 390 will complete the same curriculum as the recruits at RNZPC. 

    “Some elements of recruit training which cannot be completed at the campus, including tactical training and swim assessment, will be completed offsite. 

    “We know that being away from home for several months has been a deterrent for people wanting to join Police. The recruit training being based in Auckland will open the doors for a dream job that might not have been possible otherwise.  

    “Whether you’re taking your first steps into the workforce or considering a career change, the best time to apply is right now.

    “If you are ready to start your training for one of the most rewarding careers there is, visit newcops.govt.nz to apply today,” Deputy Commissioner Rogers says.

    ENDS

    Issued by Police Media Centre. 

    MIL OSI New Zealand News –

  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: MOU for deepening cooperation & peace as enshrined in the teachings of the Buddha

    Source: Government of India

    Posted On: 07 MAY 2025 8:31PM by PIB Delhi

    During the exposition in Vietnam of the Holy Relics of the Buddha from India to coincide with the United Nations (UN) Day of Vesak 2025, in the presence of the Head of Indian Delegation, Union Minister of Minority Affairs and Parliamentary Affairs, Shri Kiren Rijiju an MOU was signed by the Secretary General of International Buddhist Confederation (IBC) Ven. Shartse Khensur Rinpoche Jangchup Choeden and the President of the National Vietnam Buddhist Sangha (VBS), and Dhamma Council member of IBC, Most Ven. Dr Thich Thien Nhon.

    This Memorandum of Understanding was in pursuance to the agreement signed on 29 May 2022 between the two bodies in the spirit of deepening cooperation and advancing the shared ideals of compassion, wisdom, and peace as enshrined in the teachings of the Buddha.

    This declaration, the official launch of the Vietnam Chapter of the International Buddhist Confederation was also signed, as a witness by the Vice President of the Sangha, Most Ven. Thich Thien Phap and from India by the Director General of IBC, Mr. Abhijit Halder, in the presence of the Indian Ambassador to Vietnam, Shri Sandeep Arya and Most Ven. Dr Thich Nhat Tu, Standing Vice Chancellor, Vietnam Buddhist University and Vice President of IBC. It was attended by several senior Sangha members from the Vietnamese, including VBS members who have been actively involved in India related activities on the VBS.

     

    This Chapter shall broadly serve as a platform to promote the core values of Buddha Dhamma in Vietnam and beyond, contributing to global peace, harmony, and sustainable development; besides strengthen the bonds of brotherhood among Buddhist traditions, schools, and practitioners across nations.

    It would also facilitate cultural, educational, and humanitarian exchange programs and support research, publications, and events that enhance understanding and dissemination of Buddhist teachings.

    The agreement also enables representation of Vietnam’s Buddhist community in regional and international forums coordinated by the IBC.

    The IBC and the VBS have been traditional partners since the inception of IBC. Senior members of the VBS are members in the governing Body of IBC. This agreement will further strengthen bonds between the Buddhist bodies of the two countries.

    ****

    Sunil Kumar Tiwari

    pibculture[at]gmail[dot]com

    (Release ID: 2127603) Visitor Counter : 15

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News –

  • MIL-OSI Australia: New tool to fast-track ovarian cancer diagnosis

    Source:

    08 May 2025

    A woman’s chances of surviving ovarian cancer at least five years after diagnosis come down to the toss of a coin: just 49% will reach that milestone, making it one of the most lethal reproductive cancers worldwide.

    One of the reasons for the high mortality rate is late-stage diagnosis and delayed treatment due to nonspecific symptoms that are often missed by healthcare professionals and women themselves.

    University of South Australia postdoctoral researcher, Dr Amanda Lumsden, with a transdisciplinary team, is hoping to rectify this by co-designing a user-friendly symptom assessment tool for ovarian cancer, thanks to a $45,087 Catalyst grant from Health Translation SA (HTSA).

    Via an online ovarian cancer symptom scoping survey, researchers will gather feedback from people with lived experience of ovarian cancer (as well as clinicians) to help develop a prototype symptom assessment tool. The tool will detail potential symptoms and risk factors for ovarian cancer and will lay the groundwork for a larger study to test how well the prototype performs.

    Dr Lumsden, a Research Fellow based in UniSA’s Australian Centre for Precision Health, says that unlike mammograms and cervical screening tests that help detect breast and cervical cancer at an early stage, there are no public screening programs for picking up ovarian cancer early.

    “Women with ovarian cancer may experience nonspecific symptoms for up to two or more years before the tumour becomes clinically apparent, and often do not connect these symptoms with cancer,” Dr Lumsden says. “By then, the tumour has usually progressed to an advanced stage.”

    “Abdominal issues, including bloating, pain and loss of appetite are red flags. If there is a family history of ovarian cancer, this should also be considered. Some other factors are linked to lower risk, such as having children, and having ever used oral contraceptives.

    “We are hoping to identify common symptoms, patterns and themes experienced by people who have experienced an ovarian cancer diagnosis and use these findings to inform the development of the tool.”

    “This is a very exciting avenue of research, and an important first step in a larger program of work,” says Professor Elina Hyppönen, who leads the group. If we can find a way to identify high risk women at an earlier stage, this can increase the available treatment options, and hopefully help to ensure better treatment outcomes.”

    The online ovarian cancer symptom scoping survey is open until 20 June. Take the survey here:

     https://unisasurveys.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_3KuR3ohn99UX48K

    ………………………………………………………………………………………………

    Media contact: Melissa Keogh, Communications Officer, UniSA M: +61 403 659 154 E: melissa.keogh@unisa.edu.au

    Researcher contact: Dr Amanda Lumsden E: amanda.lumsden@unisa.edu.au

    Other articles you may be interested in

    MIL OSI News –

  • MIL-OSI China: Chinese language proficiency competition held in Malta

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    Six students from the University of Malta showcased their Chinese language skills and talents on Wednesday during the Maltese leg of the 24th “Chinese Bridge” Chinese proficiency competition for foreign university students.

    The event, held at the university and organized by the Confucius Institute, provided a platform for students to express their passion for the Chinese language and share their dreams of visiting China.

    Following their speeches delivered in Chinese, participants demonstrated talents, such as singing Chinese songs, playing Chinese music with piano or flute, performing shadow puppetry or reading a Chinese poem. The performances captivated the audience, who responded with enthusiastic applause.

    Marie Claire Aquilina won the first prize in the competition and will travel to China to represent the University of Malta in the global finals. Aquilina is currently pursuing a master’s degree in translation and hopes to one day work as a translator between Chinese and Maltese, or become a Chinese language teacher.

    Second-place winner Matilde Ferrario would also have the opportunity to visit China. “Knowing Chinese will help me a lot with my future job hunting,” said Ferrario, who hopes to pursue a career in tourism.

    Dennis Mizzi, foreign director of the Confucius Institute at the University of Malta, expressed hope that more students would take up the study of Chinese. 

    MIL OSI China News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Senators Coons, Curtis introduce bipartisan legislation to help small businesses bring new technologies to market

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Delaware Christopher Coons
    WASHINGTON – U.S. Senators Chris Coons (D-Del.) and John Curtis (R-Utah) today introduced legislation that would help innovative small businesses commercialize their technologies. The Research Advancing to Market Production (RAMP) for Innovators Act updates the SBIR/STTR programs—often called “America’s seed fund”—to turn more technological research into market-ready products.  
    A companion bill was also introduced today in the House by Representatives Chrissy Houlahan (D-Pa.) and Troy Balderson (R-Ohio). 
    “Innovative small businesses in Delaware and across the country drive our economy further, and we need to cut red tape so that it’s easier for these businesses bring their ideas to customers faster and profit off their research,” said Senator Coons. “The bipartisan RAMP for Innovators Act makes it easier for small businesses conducting government-funded research to more easily commercialize their work, ensuring these grants will strengthen our economy for years to come.” 
    “Utah’s small businesses are the backbone of our state’s economy, representing over 99% of all companies,” said Senator Curtis. “To sustain our economic strength and preserve Utah’s exceptional quality of life, it’s crucial that we empower these businesses to succeed. By improving programs that foster innovation and commercialization, our bipartisan legislation helps entrepreneurs develop new technologies and bring them to market—strengthening our economy and our competitiveness on the world stage.”
    “As an entrepreneur myself, I know the difficulties that small businesses in our Commonwealth and country face in scaling their operations and getting their products to the shelves,” said Representative Houlahan. “Federal programs that support our small businesses need to be both more efficient and more effective in order to make the American dream a reality for small business owners. The RAMP for Innovators Act provides entrepreneurs with streamlined access to the resources, intellectual property protections, and capital they need to scale, compete, and succeed. I’m proud to lead this bipartisan, bicameral legislation to ensure that more of the amazing, innovative technologies developed by American entrepreneurs become a reality, helping our nation maintain its competitive edge.”
    “America’s strength has always come from our ability to foster innovation and empower those willing to take risks,” said Representative Balderson. “The RAMP for Innovators Act ensures that our tech entrepreneurs have the tools they need to grow, compete globally, and transform bold ideas into real products, good-paying jobs, and lasting economic growth in places like Central Ohio and across the country.”
    The RAMP for Innovators Act builds on the success of two competitive programs for developing small business innovation: the Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) and the Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) programs. Currently, federal agencies use these programs to award grants and contracts to small businesses across the country for high-tech research that helps solve Washington’s research and development needs. However, various roadblocks and administrative delays make it hard for these businesses to turn their research into commercial products. The RAMP for Innovators Act cuts red tape around the SBIR/STTR programs to help more of these innovative businesses make money off their ideas on the open market.
    Specifically, the legislation would:
    Streamline and accelerate the SBIR/STTR application and award process
    Provide agencies a fast-track option for making awards to promising small businesses
    Designate a Technology Commercialization Officer at each agency with an SBIR/STTR program
    Provide awardees with robust and flexible technical assistance
    Provide awardees with access to I-Corps training to help bring their technologies to market
    Increase clarity on SBIR/STTR commercialization performance by requiring a metrics-based assessment
    Establish a fast-track patent examination process for awardees
    Senator Coons has long championed small businesses and entrepreneurs up and down Delaware and across the country. Last week, he introduced the bipartisan Made in America Manufacturing Finance Act with Senator Joni Ernst (R-Iowa) to reshape the financial landscape for small businesses. 
    This bill has been endorsed by the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation (ITIF), the University City Science Center, BPC Action, and the Delaware Small Business Development Center.
    “ITIF supports RAMP for Innovators, the Research Advancing to Market Production for Innovators Act, which will further bolster the commercialization potential of SBIR/STTR programs through improvements such as making commercialization potential a stronger consideration in project selection, clarifying that all awardees may use a share of Phase I and II funds for commercially oriented activities, and supporting the ability of innovators to secure intellectual property rights underpinning their inventions through stronger linkages with the PTO,” said Dr. Rob Atkinson, President of ITIF.
    “The University City Science Center heartily endorses the Research Advancing to Market Production for Innovators Act introduced by Senators Coons and Curtis and Representatives Houlahan and Balderson. This legislation would codify language that has already been signed into law to ensure that commercialization is central to the goals of SBIR and STTR. The RAMP for Innovators Act fulfills the mission of the 2016 SBIR/STTR recommendations from the National Advisory Council on Innovation and Entrepreneurship (NACIE) at the Department of Commerce. I was honored to serve as a member of NACIE during this time and believe these recommendations are necessary to fulfill our commercialization needs in this country,” said Tiffany Wilson, CEO of the University City Science Center.
    “American innovation is the foundation upon which U.S. economic competitiveness is built. Commercializing more new technologies helps the United States strengthen its edge over our competitors and ensures taxpayers get a good return on their investment in research and development. BPC Action applauds Senators Coons and Curtis, and Representatives Houlahan and Balderson, for their bipartisan leadership in reintroducing the RAMP for Innovators Act,” said Michele Stockwell, President of BPC Action.
    “Delaware SBDC is pleased to endorse the new SBIR Commercialization Bill, the Research Advancing to Market Production for Innovators Act. There are significant improvements to help entrepreneurs move innovation to commercialization,” said Mike Bowman, Director of Delaware Small Business Development Center. 
    Senators Coons and Curtis are members of the Senate Small Business and Entrepreneurship Committee.  
    You can read the one-pager here.
    You can read the full text of the bill here.

    MIL OSI USA News –