Category: US Senate

  • MIL-OSI USA: Welch Votes Against Defunding Global Health, Public Media 

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator Peter Welch (D-Vermont)
    WASHINGTON, D.C.—Early this morning, U.S. Senator Peter Welch (D-Vt.) voted against President Trump’s rescissions bill, which claws back more than $9 billion in congressionally-appropriated funding for global health, foreign aid, and public media:  
    “This federal funding was negotiated on a bipartisan basis, passed with bipartisan support in both the Senate and House, and signed into law by President Trump. The rescissions bill is a reckless abandonment of our obligation as an independent branch of government to set spending. Republicans have, yet again, willingly ceded even more power to President Trump and Elon Musk’s DOGE,” said Senator Welch. “This bill has far-reaching, devastating impacts—the cuts to public media, global health, peacekeeping missions, and international food aid will hurt hundreds of millions of people, at home and around the world. My colleagues have made it clear that they will turn their backs on rural American communities and starving children to appease Donald Trump.” 
    The bill passed around 2:30am on Thursday.
    Senator Welch voted in support of amendments to protect funding for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB) and to restore funding for global health and food and nutrition aid programs. 
    The rescissions package, requested by President Trump and supported by Senate Republicans, would claw back millions of dollars in humanitarian assistance, foreign aid, and global health initiatives. This bill cuts funding for the United States Agency for International Development (USAID); the World Health Organization (WHO); United Nations peacekeeping missions; migration and refugee assistance programs; the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria; international food aid missions; the United States Institute of Peace (USIP); the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF); and more.  
    Earlier this week Senator Welch called on Republicans to drop efforts to cut funding for the Global Fund, as well as President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), the latter of which was removed from the rescissions package Tuesday.
    The Corporation for Public Broadcasting supports National Public Radio (NPR), the Public Broadcasting Service (PBS) and member stations across the United States. This bill would cut more than $1 billion in funding from the CPB, and hurt over 1,500 public radio and television stations across the country. Vermont stations received more than $2 million from the CPB in Fiscal Year 2024. Rural communities, families, and farmers rely on CPB-funded systems and news stations for lifesaving emergency alerts, breaking news, and educational programming.  
    Last week, Senator Welch spoke out against the president’s request cut funding for CPB and public media, saying “We must not abandon the people we represent and the right they have to public broadcasting. And we cannot abandon the trust we must have in one another to keep our word. An agreement made must be an agreement kept.” 

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Cortez Masto: Republicans’ Claw Back of Bipartisan Funding will Hurt Families, Make Nevadans Less Safe

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Nevada Cortez Masto

    Washington, D.C. – U.S. Senator Catherine Cortez Masto (D-Nev.) voted against the Republican rescission package, which would cut already-approved bipartisan funding for public TV and radio as well as for global humanitarian aid. The legislation, which now heads back to the U.S. House of Representatives, would cut support for critical educational and public safety programs in Nevada.

    “Today, Republicans voted to slash funds that help rural communities, Tribes, families with kids, and farmers across the country. Public broadcasting funding in particular plays a critical role in delivering emergency alerts and keeping communities across Nevada safe,” said Senator Cortez Masto. “This vote also sets the dangerous precedent that Republicans can claw back funding that was already approved by Congress with bipartisan support. Nevadans deserve better.”

    The Republican rescission package would cut foreign aid programs that support American farmers, help thousands of vulnerable children worldwide, and help counter the influence of countries like Communist China abroad.

    The bill would slash over $7.5 million from public broadcasting in Nevada – including from Nevada Public Radio (KNPR), KUNR, Reno PBS TV, and Vegas PBS TV. The cuts would in turn affect rural communities whose radio and TV stations rely on public broadcasting funding – including stations in Laughlin, Mesquite, Elko, Tonopah, Round Mountain, and more. Eliminating these critical dollars will make it harder to get safety information and warnings to Nevadans in the cases of emergencies, AMBER Alerts, and natural disasters like wildfires. Public TV and radio also serve as critical resources that provide educational programming to children and families across the state. The average cost to the American taxpayer for public broadcasting is about $1.60 per person per year.

    “The elimination of CPB funding is a direct threat to Nevada Public Radio’s ability to cover news across our state—especially in rural communities, many of which are already considered news deserts. This decision undermines the essential role public media plays in connecting Nevadans with trusted, fact-based journalism and independent reporting that commercial media often overlooks. While CPB accounts for about 8% of our funding, its loss will be felt far beyond our budget—it jeopardizes our capacity to tell the stories of underrepresented communities, hold institutions accountable, and sustain meaningful reporting in places where no other outlet exists,” said Favian Perez, CEO & President of Nevada Public Radio.

    “We are beyond disappointed that despite the work of Senators Cortez Masto and Rosen, a majority of the Senate has decided to ignore the will of the American people and vote to defund public broadcasting. Due to this action thousands of Nevada’s families may lose access to the quality educational programs, services and emergency alerting notices provided by public television. This decision will have a negative impact on the quality of life in our state,” said Kurt A. Mische, President & CEO of PBS Reno.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Hoeven Statement on Senate Passage of President Trump’s Rescissions Request Legislation Makes $9 Billion in Spending Cuts

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for North Dakota John Hoeven
    07.17.25
    WASHINGTON – Senator John Hoeven issued the following statement after the Senate approved President Trump’s request to rescind $9 billion in wasteful spending. The White House submitted the rescissions package, which represents less than one-tenth of 1 percent of the federal budget, to Congress for consideration.
    “The American people have made it clear that we need to get control of our debt and deficit,” said Hoeven. “This package represents a fraction of our federal budget but is an important step in reining in federal spending. The vast majority of the rescissions come from foreign aid, and will help get rid of projects we shouldn’t be funding.”

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Senate Passes Legislation to Rescind Wasteful Federal Spending

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator Kevin Cramer (R-ND)

    WASHINGTON, D.C. – By a vote of 51 to 48 the United States Senate advanced the Rescissions Act of 2025 to rescind $9 billion in unnecessary, wasteful federal funds. The bill, which passed the House of Representatives in June by a vote of 214 to 212, will now return to the House for final consideration.

    The Rescissions Act of 2025 formalizes $9 billion in requested cuts made by the Trump administration. The bill contains 20 targeted rescissions of unobligated balances. Under the Impoundment Control Act, Congress must address the administration’s requested cuts within a 45-day window, or the funding remains in federal coffers. The bill must be sent to President Trump’s desk by Friday.

    U.S. Senator Kevin Cramer (R-ND), a member of the Senate DOGE Caucus, issued the following statement after voting in favor of the rescissions package:

    “After four years of reckless spending by the Biden administration, President Trump is right to request this cut in wasteful spending and Congress was right to pass it. This bill reclaims taxpayer dollars for hardworking North Dakotans and Americans, but this is only the beginning. Congress and the administration have a lot more work to do to restore accountability and fiscal sanity to Washington.”

    This rescissions package cuts funding for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB), which funds National Public Radio (NPR) and Public Broadcasting Service (PBS). The Trump administration’s request described the funds as being used to “subsidize a public media system that is politically biased and an unnecessary expense to the taxpayer.”

    While the CPB is legally mandated to be nonpolitical and unbiased, it has funded content celebrating irrevocable ‘gender transitions’ in minors, segments framing healthy eating and doorway sizes as forms of “fatphobia,” and children’s programming featuring drag queens. NPR has published stories on “genderqueer dinosaur enthusiasts,” “nonbinary deer,” and “hermaphrodite banana slugs,” while dismissing the Hunter Biden laptop scandal and pushing the discredited Russia-collusion narrative. In April 2024, Cramer led several of his colleagues in a letter to NPR CEO Katherine Maher, highlighting deep concerns regarding the network’s national leadership and calling for the enforcement of journalistic standards Americans deserve.

    Importantly, these cuts do not impact emergency broadcast capabilities. North Dakota radio stations continue to provide critical emergency services, and all for-profit broadcasters are required by the FCC to maintain an Emergency Alert System (EAS) and typically employ their own meteorologists. FEMA’s Integrated Public Alert & Warning System (IPAWS), and the Next Generation Warning System Grant Program (NGWS) also remain fully funded.

    These rescissions also eliminate funding in foreign-aid accounts antithetical to American interests and outside the scope of Congressional intent.  Taxpayer dollars have been allocated to projects such as promoting veganism in Zambia, funding pride parades in Lesotho, wind farms in Ukraine, DEIA contractors in Belarus, and gender diversity in Mexican street lighting. Other rescinded accounts supported “sedentary migrant” outreach in Colombia, reproductive health climate curricula, and social media mentorship in Eastern Europe—all at the expense of the American taxpayer. At the same time, the Senate bill provides guardrails to protect core Global Health Program funding —PEPFAR, tuberculosis, malaria, maternal and child health, and nutrition. It also protects the Countering PRC Influence Fund and reaffirms commitment to aid in the Middle East.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Grassley-Led HALT Fentanyl Act Becomes Law

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Iowa Chuck Grassley

    WASHINGTON – President Donald Trump today signed the Halt All Lethal Trafficking of (HALT) Fentanyl Act into law, permanently classifying illicit, fentanyl-related substances as Schedule I. The bipartisan and bicameral legislation was led by Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Chairman Bill Cassidy, M.D. (R-La.) and Sen. Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.).

    “The HALT Fentanyl Act is now the law of the land, marking a major victory in America’s fight against fentanyl,” Grassley said. “By permanently classifying fentanyl-related substances as Schedule I, the HALT Fentanyl Act will save American lives and prevent deadly fentanyl knockoffs from making their way into Iowa communities. I applaud President Trump’s action today, as well as his ongoing commitment to turning the corner on the Biden administration’s disastrous policies and creating a safer America.”  

    Download photos HERE. 

    Download bill text HERE and a fact sheet HERE.  

    Background:

    The HALT Fentanyl Act was introduced by Grassley, Cassidy and Heinrich in January, advanced by the Senate Judiciary Committee in February, passed by the Senate in March and passed by the House of Representatives in June. Both houses of Congress passed the bill by overwhelming margins.

    The bipartisan bill is supported by over 40 major advocacy groups, including a coalition of over 200 impacted family groups and law enforcement organizations representing over a million officers. Learn more about the bill’s widespread support HERE.

    -30-

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Senator Marshall: Our National Debt is the Biggest Problem Our Country Faces

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Kansas Roger Marshall

    Senator Marshall Joins CNN to Talk About The Rescissions Package
    Washington – On Wednesday, U.S. Senator Roger Marshall, M.D. (R-Kansas), joined Jake Tapper on CNN’s The Lead with Jake Tapper to discuss the rescissions package and how out-of-control Congressional spending is the biggest issue facing America.

    Click HERE or on the image above to watch Senator Marshall’s full interview.
    On whether the Senate should take orders from the White House on spending:
    “I think the biggest problem that this country faces is our $37 trillion national debt, that we’re spending a trillion dollars a year on interest. If you think about where these cuts are coming from, USAID, our own Government Accounting Office, our own Inspector General have said that USAID is the systemic risk. That there’s significant fraud, waste, and abuse going on. That they don’t really have an audit system.
    “So we have identified with Congressional review significant waste and fraud. Think about  USAID. Just recently, a $500 million fraud scheme of bribes [uncovered] here in this country, overseeing those programs. In New Guinea $100 million embezzlement issue, or $50 million of waste on medical equipment in Zambia. So the fraud, the waste, the abuse, is out there. We need to do something. And this is some, I would say, low-hanging fruit. I wish we had a bigger rescission package.”
    On the Congressional spending problems facing the country:
    “Well, certainly Congress has a spending problem, and we need to address that. But I think that we want to be frugal with our money. I was taught to be frugal, to be concerned with other people’s money, which is what this is, and to take the very best care of it that I can.
    “I don’t care how much debt we’re in or even if we had a surplus, I don’t want to see waste and fraud like we’ve been seeing through USAID. I do think that both parties need to do a better job of working towards a balanced budget. Again, our national debt is the biggest problem our country faces long term.”

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: REMARKS: Senator Coons condemns deep cuts to humanitarian and disaster aid in moving speech on Senate floor

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Delaware Christopher Coons
    WASHINGTON – U.S. Senator Chris Coons (D-Del.) delivered a floor speech today condemning proposed Republican-led efforts to axe humanitarian and disaster relief funding, and eliminate publicly broadcast emergency alerts for rural communities in the latest budget rescission package. The cuts, totaling approximately $9 billion, or roughly 0.1% of the federal budget, target critical aid programs including the World Food Program, UNICEF, Catholic Relief Services, Save the Children, and disaster response efforts around the globe. During his speech, Senator Coons said the cuts not only undermine America’s values, but they also betray the moral teachings at the heart of our faith traditions.
    “Jesus wept,” Senator Coons began, referencing the Gospel of John. Senator Coons warned that the proposed $9 billion in rescissions, which include drastic reductions to food assistance, refugee aid, and disaster response, would cause similar needless suffering to our most vulnerable. “For God’s justice is swift and sure, and I tremble when I think about the answer this chamber will give today to the question, who is my neighbor? Ladies and gentlemen of the Senate, we should turn aside. We should not, with this act and this vote today, make Jesus weep.”
    Despite the focus of President Trump and his Republican allies in Congress on cutting foreign aid this year, the United States spends less than 1% of its annual budget on foreign assistance. The money feeds starving children, combats epidemics overseas before they reach American shores, helps us strengthen partnerships and alliances, and is critical in helping us outcompete China.
    “I was on a bipartisan trip to the Philippines just a few months ago with Senator Ricketts, and I was struck to learn that the Philippines of all the nations on Earth is the most prone to natural disasters,” Senator Coons continued. “They value our partnership, our alliance. We’ve been security partners for decades. There’s many Filipino-Americans. There’s a close and deep relationship. But in meeting with their national leaders, their elected leaders, their senators and their ministers of their cabinet, they said, you know, it makes an incredible difference here in the Philippines: every time there’s a typhoon, there’s an earthquake, there’s a volcano, it’s the Americans who come. It’s the Americans who deliver the aid, who help us help ourselves with training and equipment and support.”
    Shortly afterward, Senator Coons offered an amendment on the Senate floor to strip out $496 million of the cuts that target international disaster relief.
    A video and transcript of Senator Coons’ remarks are available below.
    WATCH HERE.
    Senator Coons: Jesus wept. Jesus wept. Most of us who grew up in bible-believing households know this is the shortest verse in all of Scripture, and in some ways the most powerful – one that haunts me. Jesus wept in John, the 11th chapter, 35th verse, because he had come too late, seemingly, to save the life of Lazarus. He wept because someone he knew and loved had died, and it had caused such harm and loss to his family. Today we are doing something on this floor of this Senate – my Republican colleagues are doing something on the floor of this Senate – that I believe would make Jesus weep.
    In Luke, there’s a moment in the 10th chapter where a lawyer – and it’s always a lawyer – comes to test Jesus, and trying to justify himself, presses Jesus with questions: “What must I do to gain eternal life?” And Jesus says, “what does the Scripture teach?” He says, “You should love the Lord your God with all your heart, all your soul, and all your mind. And the second commandment is like unto it, you should love your neighbor as yourself.” Jesus says, “you have read well. Do this and you will gain eternal life.” But the lawyer, hoping to be justified says – “but, but, but wait. Who is my neighbor?” And what follows is the well-known parable of the good Samaritan where the righteous, the priestly, the respected, the powerful walk on the other side of the road when they encounter someone who’s been set upon by robbers. Not my problem, not my neighbor. But in the parable of the good Samaritan, it’s this person – a Samaritan from a disfavored ethnicity, someone outside the circle of concern to the ancient Israelites – who does the right thing.
    This parable would have been shocking at the time that it was preached by Jesus. The idea that the “good neighbor” was the outcast – the unexpected – would be something that frankly would have been a surprise. So although today being a ‘good Samaritan’ is a common term, it’s important to know the history. We are taught as children that we are to see all as our neighbors, not just those who live next door, not just those who look like us or speak like us or pray like us, but the widest possible definition of neighbor is what we are called through righteousness to see in the world.
    And what a difference it has made. Because our nation has for decades embraced the cause of being present, of caring, of making lifesaving differences to young mothers and children, to widows and orphans, to the imprisoned, to the hungry, to the refugee, to those fleeing oppression, to those seeking relief from authoritarian governments, for those seeking a better way. We are all God’s children, and from childhood we are taught that the Golden Rule, which appears in virtually every religion – do unto others as you would have them unto to you – is the very foundation of the goodness of America, that we care for each other as neighbors, and we care for the world as neighbors. Yes, we are the most charitable, giving, philanthropic, engaged nation on Earth. And yet all that we do in foreign aid is less than 1% of our total federal budget.
    Months ago, when Elon Musk and DOGE began roaming about the federal agencies of our government, their first target was that that delivers disaster relief, that helps feed the hungry, that helps welcome the refugee, that helps stabilize countries going through turmoil. They laid off thousands. They shut down programs. They canceled billions [of dollars]. And yet, here today we are at it again. Republicans are proposing even deeper cuts.
    I want to talk about one area of the many that will be cut, I fear, later today: disaster assistance. Our nation has been riveted as we’ve watched the tragedy that unfolded in the Texas Hill Country, where a raging river killed dozens and dozens of innocent children. And you know, around the world, when disaster strikes, it is the Americans who show up first. It is Americans who show up with relief, with assistance, with skill and talent and ability.
    It’s been this way for decades and it should be this way still. I was on a bipartisan trip to the Philippines just a few months ago with Senator Ricketts, and I was struck to learn that the Philippines, of all the nations on Earth, is the most prone to natural disasters. They value our partnership, our alliance. We’ve been security partners for decades. There’s many Filipino-Americans. There’s a close and deep relationship. But in meeting with their national leaders, their elected leaders, their senators and their ministers of their cabinet, they said, you know, it makes an incredible difference here in the Philippines: every time there’s a typhoon, there’s an earthquake, there’s a volcano, it’s the Americans who come. It’s the Americans who deliver the aid, who help us help ourselves with training and equipment and support. And you know, in the excess of DOGE’s deep cuts, they fired and laid off most of our experts who are capable of delivering world-class disaster relief.
    We saw the consequences with an earthquake in Myanmar just three months ago, where the few remaining folks who did this work were laid off as they were deployed. And instead, the response was led by the Chinese. We are driving nations into the open arms of our adversaries. We have long been known as a nation that sought to be respected, admired, believed in, embraced, not for the example of our power, but by the power of our example. That when there were dread pandemics killing millions, America showed up. 
    One of the positives of this day is that my Republican colleagues have recoiled from fully shutting down PEPFAR, and that is a positive. One of the best things we’ve ever done as a nation is to save 27 million lives across the world that otherwise would have been lost to HIV and AIDS. But I’ll tell you, when Ebola raged across Africa in 2014, I was the one member of Congress who went to Liberia at the request of the president – a Nobel Peace Prize winner, a brave and proud leader of a nation struggling facing massive losses of life. Projections at the early stages of the Ebola pandemic were that a fifth to a quarter of their population would die in a matter of weeks. And who came to help? The Americans. Catholic Relief Services, Save the Children, CARE, the U.S. military, our public health service. 
    I’ll never forget meeting a young Liberian named Alvin. He dropped out of college to become a physician’s assistant to help when the outbreak began and he in caring for patients himself contracted Ebola – a near certain death sentence. Yet, Alvin was evacuated by Americans to the Ebola treatment center set up and funded and equipped by Americans. And his life was saved by Americans. Whether it was the president of the nation, Ellen Johnson Sirleaf, or Alvin, the folks I met on that trip to Liberia thanked and praised the American people for our decency, our kindness, our seeing them as our neighbor in their moment of deepest struggle, risk, and loss. And yet today – yet today – my colleagues would rather trim one-tenth of 1% of the budget, $9 billion, to cut deeper into food aid and disaster assistance and fighting pandemics, all to justify a tax cut.
    I can think of few more despicable acts on this floor in my 15 years. I can speak to process. We have a bipartisan appropriations process where we can and should debate and consider these further cuts, and put them on the floor, and vote them up. But this is an odd thing. It’s a rescission. It is a cutting back further of money we’ve already appropriated. Just a few minutes later today, I will be trying to get votes to end $465 million of further cuts in disaster assistance that’ll be on the floor today. Taking money from the World Food Program and UNICEF, from Red Cross and Save the Children, from Catholic Relief Services and World Vision. Folks may think at home that this money that goes out to the world is money better spent here, but for the pennies on the federal dollar that we spend responding to disasters around the world, organizations we all know and the majority of us believe in and support, like the Red Cross, World Vision, or Catholic Relief Services are able to appear in time and deliver lifesaving aid. 
    Think about what we are doing. Think about the example we are setting. Think about what we are teaching our children. Open your hearts and eyes and realize what we are about to do. This is a nation of which I am so proud, and yet at times it does things of which I am so ashamed. I cannot imagine the faces in the refugee camps, in the villages, in the clinics, in the schools, in the towns, in the cities around the world, who for years have been used to the idea that when there’s a pandemic, the Americans come; that when there’s an earthquake, the Americans come; that when there is starvation, the Americans come. Today we will vote, “no, we won’t.” We are more interested in ourselves and in a bigger tax cut than we are in saving starving children, people laid low by the devastation of an earthquake, families separated by a typhoon. The best part of this nation – what truly makes us great – is our selfless giving to others. We will be judged by how we act today. For God’s justice is swift and sure, and I tremble when I think about the answer this chamber will give today to the question, who is my neighbor?
    Ladies and gentlemen of the Senate, we should turn aside. We should not, with this act and this vote today, make Jesus weep.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Senator Coons’ amendment to save international disaster relief funding blocked by Republicans

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Delaware Christopher Coons
    WASHINGTON – U.S. Senator Chris Coons (D-Del.) today introduced an amendment to the Republican rescissions package that would have removed $496 million in cuts to international disaster relief, effectively saving the program. Senator Coons is a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and Ranking Member of the Senate Defense Appropriations Subcommittee.
    Ahead of the vote, Senator Coons spoke on the floor about the urgency of this funding to help us outcompete China, raise our standing in the world, and promote our national security. “This money doesn’t just save lives in countries around the world when they suffer from earthquakes and tornadoes, hurricanes and natural disasters,” he said. “It strengthens our standing, brings us closer to our allies, and helps us compete with China.”
    International disaster assistance funding is a crucial piece of America’s foreign policy toolkit. The account responds to emergency humanitarian situations in over 60 countries and is a crucial component of our competition with China for global influence. For instance, Filipino leaders have cited disaster assistance funding as the key reason why the nation gave the United States access to nine military sites across the country.
    These cuts will also have a major impact on organizations that are household names and carry out much of the disaster response, including Catholic Relief Services, Save the Children, and UNICEF.
    The amendment was narrowly blocked by Republicans, 49-50. U.S. Senators Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), Susan Collins (R-Maine), and Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) voted for the amendment.
    A video and transcript of Senator Coons’ remarks before the amendment vote are below.
    WATCH HERE.
    Senator Coons: Mr. President, it was Ronald Reagan who said “America is great because America is good.” My amendment would restore $496 million of international disaster relief funding by removing it from this rescissions package. This money doesn’t just save lives in countries around the world when they suffer from earthquakes and tornadoes, hurricanes and natural disasters. It strengthens our standing, brings us closer to our allies, and helps us compete with China.
    Two months ago, I visited the Philippines on a bipartisan CODEL and was struck to learn it is the most natural disaster-prone country on earth. Today, they’re giving us access to nine new military sites. They are one of our strongest treaty partners in the region. And why? When I asked their leaders, they said, because America helps respond to disasters.
    $496 million. Point-zero-one percent of the debt Republicans have just added to our nation in the past two weeks. And this money is implemented by Catholic Relief Services, World Vision, the World Food Program –
    Senator Sheehy: The senator’s time is expired.
    Senator Coons: I ask my colleagues to support it.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: July 16th, 2025 ICYMI: ENR Ranking Member Heinrich Blasts Trump Administration’s Plan to Transfer National Parks to States, Devastating Rural Economies, Cutting Access to Public Lands, & Killing Jobs

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for New Mexico Martin Heinrich

    WASHINGTON — Today, U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), Ranking Member of the U.S. Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, and Climate Power’s Executive Director Lori Lodes held a press call on Climate Power’s new report, which details the catastrophic economic and budgetary impacts of the Trump Administration’s plan to transfer national park units to state control.

    The report, “The High Cost of a Park Giveaway: Trump’s Plan to Offload National Parks,” highlights how this radical proposal would devastate local economies, overwhelm state budgets, and dismantle the systems that keep public lands running. According to Climate Power’s New Mexico report,New Mexico stands to lose at least $177 million in economic output with the Trump Administration’s plan to transfer national park units to states.

    “By transferring ‘sort of small-p parks’ to the states, the Trump Administration and its supporters aren’t giving states more power or saving taxpayer money,” said Heinrich, blasting the Trump Administration for plans to offload national park units to states. “They’ll be cutting off your access to public lands and devastating state economies in the process, overwhelming state budgets and dismantling the systems that keep public lands running.”

    Heinrich continued, “We’re here today to continue to fight, and to let you know that President Trump and Mike Lee’s latest plan of reallocating national park units to state control will not help our states. It will hurt them. It will not increase your access to national parks. It will restrict it. And it proves once again that Donald Trump and his cronies are willing to take away access to national park sites, devastate local economies, threaten your families’ safety, and kill public service jobs, all to enrich their billionaire friends. Two weeks ago, we came together, across the political spectrum, to stop the sale of our public lands. And we’re here to say: Not one acre and not on our watch.”

    A video of the press call is here. 

    A transcript of his remarks as delivered is below.

    Thank you for that introduction and good afternoon, everyone. Thanks to all of you for being here today to continue the fight to save our public lands.

    Two weeks ago, we had a huge win when Senator Mike Lee was forced to remove public lands sales from the Big, Bad Bill.

    And while an incredibly wide coalition of folks across the aisle came together to make sure the land sales were not included in the reconciliation bill, we know that this fight is far, far from over.

    The Trump Administration has made it clear that it’s determined to sell off our public lands, lands that are your birthright as an American, all to fund tax cuts for their billionaire friends and donors.

    So now, the Trump Administration is working to defund the National Parks Service — and shrink the national park system by about 75 percent.

    The Administration says it’s proposing to keep the “crown jewels.” But the public lands the Administration considers less important are incredibly important to the economic health of rural communities and to protecting our shared heritage.

    By transferring “sort of small-p parks” to the states, the Trump Administration and its supporters aren’t giving states more power or saving taxpayer money.

    They’ll be cutting off your access to public lands – and devastating state economies in the process, overwhelming state budgets, and dismantling the systems that keep public lands running.

    We know that national park system units are powerful economic drivers of our local and state economies. 

    In New Mexico, for example, people visited national park sites 2.3 million times in 2023 alone.

    Visitors spent almost $150 million that year, driving economic activity that supported over 1,800 New Mexican jobs and provided $55 million in labor income for our state.

    And these numbers were made possible by an adequately staffed National Parks Service that could properly maintain our parks, keeping lands safe, people safe, and lands accessible.

    But when national park units are transferred to states, all of that is put at risk.

    States have smaller budgets, so entrance fees would have to be higher.

    When fees are higher, visitor numbers go down and people don’t visit those places that aren’t theirs.

    When visitorship declines, fee revenue actually declines, and funding for park maintenance as a result declines.

    Poorly maintained parks can’t handle as many visitors, and the cycle continues.

    Small businesses would lose customers, and profit losses would mean less rural jobs.

    Now, you might ask: “Why can’t the states maintain the parks?”

    And the truth is, it’s expensive for states to maintain the national park system. That’s why we have a national park system.

    For the federal government, the National Park Service represents less than one-fifteenth of one percent of the total budget.

    Meanwhile, the $230 million backlog in national park maintenance in my state alone would represent over 2 percent of our state budget – and that doesn’t count the additional costs that my state would have to incur to fully run the sites ourselves.

    And this isn’t just a New Mexico problem – it will be everywhere, as you’ll hear from Climate Power in a few minutes.

    So we’re here today to continue to fight, and to let you know that President Trump and Mike Lee’s latest plan of reallocating national park units to state control will not help our states.

    It will hurt them.

    It will not increase your access to national parks.

    It will restrict it.

    And it proves once again that Donald Trump and his cronies are willing to take away access to national park sites, devastate local economies, threaten your families’ safety, and kill public service jobs, all to enrich their billionaire friends.

    Two weeks ago, we came together, across the political spectrum, to stop the sale of our public lands.

    And today we’re here to say: Not one acre and not on our watch.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: July 16th, 2025 Heinrich Statement on the 80th Anniversary of the Trinity Test

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for New Mexico Martin Heinrich

    WASHINGTON — U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.) released the following statement on the 80thanniversary of the Trinity Test:

    “For far too many New Mexicans, including Navajo uranium miners and families, today’s anniversary of the Trinity Test is a day marked by suffering, pain, and injustice. It serves as a solemn reminder of our government’s failure, for eight long decades, to recognize and support the families who lived downwind of that first nuclear explosion and who have borne its devastating consequences every day since.

    “For my entire time in Congress, I’ve been honored to fight alongside Trinity Downwinders and uranium workers to finally include all the New Mexicans exposed to radiation from the bomb’s detonation in the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act. This year, we delivered long-overdue justice by expanding this legislation to cover downwinders across the entire state of New Mexico, increase benefits, and finally expand eligibility for uranium workers to include core drillers.”

    Background:

    Heinrich has reintroduced legislation to extend and expand RECA since his first Senate term, starting in 2013.

    This month, Heinrich and the N.M. Delegation secured RECA reauthorization and expanded the legislation to include all downwinders having worked at any site in the entire state of New Mexico. Notably, the law now allows for combined work histories for uranium workers who previously did not meet eligibility requirements based on their work in only one category of uranium work. Now, employment history across multiple positions–uranium miner, uranium miller, core driller, and ore transporter–all qualify to be combined when determining eligibility. Additionally, the benefit for downwinders increased from $50,000 to $100,000 and for onsite participants from $75,000 to $100,000.

    Last month, Heinrich marked one-year since RECA expired and demanded Congress to reauthorize and expand RECA.

    In January, Heinrich joined U.S. Senators Ben Ray Luján (D-N.M.) and Josh Hawley (R-Mo.), along with U.S. Senators Eric Schmitt (R-Mo.), and Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.) to reintroduce their Radiation Exposure Compensation (RECA) Reauthorization Act to compensate Americans exposed to radiation by government nuclear programs.

    Despite the Senate passing this bill last Congress, the House of Representatives failed to pass RECA reauthorization before its expiration deadline in June 2024.

    Last fall, Heinrich joined Luján and U.S. Representatives Teresa Leger Fernández (D-N.M.), Melanie Stansbury (D-N.M.), and Gabe Vasquez (D-N.M.), and advocates and survivors who traveled all the way across the country from New Mexico for a press conference calling on Speaker Mike Johnson to hold a vote on aSenate-passed bill that would strengthen RECA.

    Heinrich also pressed Speaker Mike Johnson to immediately take up the Senate-passed and fully comprehensive RECA extension in a bipartisan, bicameral letter.

    In March 2024, Heinrich delivered remarks on the Senate floor urging his colleagues to reauthorize and expand RECA. Later that day, Heinrich secured Senate passage of bipartisan legislation to reauthorize and expand RECA to compensate individuals exposed to radiation while working in uranium mines or living downwind from atomic weapons tests.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Ernst Advances Bills to Boost American Manufacturing, Crackdown on COVID Fraudsters

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator Joni Ernst (R-IA)

    Published: July 16, 2025

    Small Business Committee passes Made In America Manufacturing Act and SBA Fraud Enforcement Extension Act.

    WASHINGTON – The U.S. Senate Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship advanced a pair of Chair Joni Ernst’s (R-Iowa) bills to unleash domestic manufacturing and hold COVID criminals accountable.
    “Republican leadership is unleashing growth across the country and making government more accountable to taxpayers,” said Ernst. “The Made in America Manufacturing Finance Act builds upon the domestic manufacturing explosion under President Trump and gives small businesses access to the resources they need to make ‘Made in America’ the norm instead of the exception. Equally as important is making sure Washington responsibly uses each tax dollar like an entrepreneur looks after their budget. After Biden’s bureaucrats were asleep at the wheel in pursuing billions in COVID fraud, my SBA Fraud Enforcement Extension Act ensures that justice will be carried out for criminals and stolen tax dollars will be recouped.”
    With manufacturing loans already soaring 74% under President Trump, the Made In America Manufacturing Finance Act allows small businesses to access the capital they need to invest in new equipment, hire new employees, and grow their businesses by doubling the individual loan limit for 7(a) and 504 small manufacturing loans from $5 million to $10 million.
    The SBA Fraud Enforcement Extension Act extends the statute of limitations from five to ten years for COVID fraudsters who stole from the Shuttered Venue Grant Operators Grant (SVOG) and Restaurant Revitalization Fund (RRF).
    Ernst initially led the legislation after a shocking report revealed that the Biden Small Business Administration (SBA) failed to pursue nearly two million individuals suspected of stealing pandemic aid.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Capito Joins President Trump for Signing of HALT Fentanyl Act

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for West Virginia Shelley Moore Capito

    WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Senator Shelley Moore Capito (R-W.Va.) today joined President Donald Trump at the White House for the signing of the HALT Fentanyl Act. The legislation, which Senator Capito co-sponsored, makes permanent the temporary classification of fentanyl and fentanyl analogs as Schedule I of the Controlled Substances Act (CSA).

    The legislation also removes barriers that impede the ability of researchers to conduct studies on these substances and allows for exemptions if such research provides evidence that it would be beneficial for specific analogs to be classified differently than Schedule I, such as for medical purposes.

    “West Virginia has been disproportionately impacted by the drug crisis, with fentanyl being one of the deadliest drugs that has made the crisis exponentially worse. The HALT Fentanyl Act will help equip law enforcement with the resources needed to crack down on traffickers and keep these deadly substances off the streets once and for all. I was proud to stand alongside President Trump—and join some of our fellow West Virginians—to watch him sign this important legislation into law, which marks another critical step forward in our ongoing efforts to combat the crisis and protect West Virginians from the scourge of illicit fentanyl,” Senator Capito said

    BACKGROUND:

    Drug overdoses, largely driven by fentanyl, are the leading cause of death among young adults 18 to 45 years old. Synthetic opioids like Fentanyl account for 66% of the total U.S. overdose deaths.

    Provisional data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) National Center for Health Statistics indicate there were an estimated 80,391 drug overdose deaths in the United States during 2024. West Virginia so far has confirmed 787 deaths between January 2024 and January 2025.

    Nearly 70% of those deaths across the country were attributed to opioids, including illegal fentanyl, which are largely manufactured in Mexico from raw materials supplied by China. In 2024, the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) seized more than 60 million fentanyl-laced fake pills and nearly 8,000 pounds of fentanyl powder. The 2024 seizures are equivalent to more than 380 million lethal doses of fentanyl.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Wyden, Merkley Join Colleagues to Introduce Bill to Safeguard Consumers from Online Subscription Traps

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator Ron Wyden (D-Ore)

    July 16, 2025

    Washington, D.C. – U.S. Senators Ron Wyden and Jeff Merkley said today they are joining colleagues in reintroducing legislation that would protect consumers in Oregon and nationwide from online free trial scams and hard-to-cancel recurring-payment programs.

    The Consumer Online Payment Transparency and Integrity (OPT-IN) Act puts the responsibility on companies rather than consumers when it comes to subscriptions and memberships, including a shift from “opt-out” default conditions  to “opt-in.” This reintroduction comes after the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit last week vacated the Federal Trade Commission’s 2023 “click to cancel” rule, which would have made it easier to get out of unwanted subscriptions. 

    “Unexpected charges and confusing websites can make unsubscribing from a service a headache,” Wyden said. “Relief was in sight, but Donald Trump’s administration killed new protections for consumers and handed a huge gift to his corporate pals. I’m proud to work with Sen. Van Hollen and my colleagues on the OPT-IN Act to ensure it’s just as easy for Americans to unsubscribe from services as it is to sign up.”

    “Consumers shouldn’t have to jump over roadblocks from greedy corporations to cancel a subscription,” Merkley said. “Our bill will make it as simple to cancel a subscription as it is to sign up – no tricks, no gimmicks, no waiting on hold. Let’s pass this common-sense solution that makes sure Americans know what they’re signing up for.”

    Companies increasingly use free trial offers and unclear terms and conditions to trap consumers into subscriptions. Additionally, companies often use software and interfaces that subtly trick users, making it harder for consumers to end these subscriptions and stop unwanted charges. While the FTC has dedicated significant resources to combating the worst of these business practices, more action is needed to effectively deter companies from employing these practices and better protect consumers.

    Specifically, the Consumer OPT-IN Act would: 

    • Require companies to get express informed consent from consumers before converting free trials into automatically renewing contracts and charging consumers.
    • Require companies to notify consumers of the first automatic renewal and obtain express informed consent from consumers before automatically renewing long-term contracts. 
    • Require that companies offering contracts that automatically renew on a short-term basis get express informed consent from consumers annually. 
    • Require companies that have knowledge that a consumer isn’t using their product or service for 6 months to get the consumer’s express informed consent to continue billing, and allow consumers to request a refund for the remaining portion of the contract. 
    • Provide consumers with refunds when violations occur.
    • Give the FTC rulemaking authority over negative option contracts, automatic renewals, and dark patterns.

    The legislation is led by Senator Chris Van Hollen, D-Md., and Representative Yvette D. Clarke, D-N.Y. Along with Wyden and Merkley, the bill is cosponsored by Senators Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., John Fetterman, D-Pa., Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y., Mazie Hirono, D-Hawai’i, Ben Ray Luján, D-N.M., Jack Reed, D-R.I., Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., Peter Welch, D-Vt.,  and Representatives Robin Kelly, D-Ill., and Doris Matsui, D-Calif.

    This legislation is endorsed by Public Citizen, National Consumer Law Center, Consumer Action, Americans for Financial Reform, and American Economic Liberties Project.

    The text of the bill is here.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: On Senate Floor, Klobuchar Fights Cuts to Public Broadcasting

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Minnesota Amy Klobuchar

    WATCH KLOBUCHAR’S FULL REMARKS HERE

    WASHINGTON — On the Senate Floor, U.S. Senator Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) spoke in opposition to legislation to clawback funding for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB) and foreign aid, which was previously approved on a bipartisan basis last Congress.

    “This clawback doesn’t just eliminate funding for, say, NPR, PBS. The primary impact of that part of the funding cuts is going to be on local radio and TV. 1,500 local public media stations across the country that receive 70% of this funding – jeopardizing these stations that provide local community services…

    I know because I know some of my communities that rely on these stations. Grand Marais, MN – the very tip of our state, the tip of Minnesota.  Do you think all these other stations are covering the Canadian wildfires? Hourly. They do because of the smoke, and people need to know the air quality when they’re making decisions about what they’re going to do that day or the next day.  

    Do you think people know when on Hwy. 61 there’s a tree over the road or there’s been a deer that’s been hit by a car and the emergency? No, they hear it on WTIP….

    This isn’t a partisan issue. 77% of Republicans and 78% of Democrats report relying on public radio for emergency alerts and news. That’s part of the reason why, for a half a century, we have agreed on a bipartisan basis in the US Senate to invest in public broadcasting. Yet now, Congressional Republicans are using a partisan process to rubber stamp the president’s unchecked power and rip away these resources.”

    Download Klobuchar’s full floor speech here.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: SIGNED INTO LAW: Bipartisan Legislation That Secures Permanent Scheduling of Fentanyl Analogues

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for New Hampshire Maggie Hassan

    Washington, D.C. – Today the Halt All Lethal Trafficking of (HALT) Fentanyl Act, bipartisan legislation that U.S. Senators Maggie Hassan and Jeanne Shaheen helped introduce and was supported by Congressman Chris Pappas (NH-01) and Congresswoman Maggie Goodlander (NH-02), was signed into law. This law permanently schedules all fentanyl-related substances as Schedule I drugs under the Controlled Substances Act to ensure law enforcement can keep them off the streets and hold drug traffickers accountable.

    “The vast majority of drug-related deaths in New Hampshire have been caused by the trafficking of illicit fentanyl. That’s why I have consistently engaged with law enforcement, public health experts, and colleagues across the aisle to ensure that the scheduling of fentanyl analogues did not lapse and is finally made permanent,” said Congressman Pappas. “The enactment of this legislation represents an important step forward and will ensure law enforcement retains the full suite of tools they need to take on the opioid crisis and crack down on drug traffickers, but we cannot rest here. I remain committed to delivering the resources our communities need to stop traffickers, bring down drug-related deaths, and support people in recovery.”

    “In the Granite State we’ve lost far too many lives due to fentanyl overdoses, and we must do everything we can to prevent more deaths,” said Senator Shaheen. “I was proud to help introduce this bipartisan legislation in the Senate and I’m glad the President has signed it into law so that we can stop the flow of fentanyl into our communities, hold traffickers accountable and save lives.”

    “Too many families across New Hampshire have experienced the devastating effects of the fentanyl crisis,” said Senator Hassan. “The HALT Fentanyl Act will permanently classify fentanyl analogues at the strongest level allowed under the law, boosting penalties and giving law enforcement more tools to get these deadly illicit drugs off our streets. This bill marks a step forward in combatting fentanyl and I am glad the President has signed it into law.”

    “Illicit fentanyl is the leading driver of overdose deaths in New Hampshire, taking the lives of hundreds of loved ones every year. We can and must do more to combat this epidemic and help save lives,” said Congresswoman Goodlander. “The HALT Fentanyl Act will help stop the flow of these dangerous drugs into our communities and hold illicit distributors accountable. I will continue working to ensure our law enforcement partners have the tools they need to keep New Hampshire communities safe.” 

    Pappas has led efforts to permanently schedule fentanyl-related substances in the House, securing several extensions of the temporary scheduling order while working to ensure the passage of permanent legislation. The HALT Fentanyl Act contains identical key provisions from Pappas’s bipartisan SAFE Act, which he first introduced in the 117th Congress.

    Shaheen has spearheaded crucial legislation and funding to fight the substance use disorder epidemic, including through her leadership on the pivotal U.S. Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Commerce, Justice, Science and Related Agencies, which funds the U.S. Department of Justice. Shaheen recently introduced her bipartisan Keeping Drugs Out of Schools Act to help prevent youth opioid use and overdoses by establishing a new grant program that allows current or former Drug-Free Communities (DFC) coalitions to partner with schools to provide resources educating students about the dangers of synthetic opioids. Shaheen has also led the bipartisan Cooper Davis Act which would crack down on online drug sales through social media and helped enact the FENTANYL Results Act to increase global cooperation in the fight against synthetic drug trafficking.

    Senator Hassan has worked to stop drug trafficking and support communities devastated by the fentanyl crisis. She helped advance the DETECT Fentanyl and Xylazine Act, which was signed into law last year and is supporting law enforcement with enhanced tools to find and eliminate illegal substances such as fentanyl and xylazine. Senators Hassan, Shaheen, and their colleagues also passed into law the FEND Off Fentanyl Act, which targets the illicit fentanyl supply chain and imposes sanctions on traffickers. Senator Hassan also developed the END FENTANYL Act, signed into law last year, which helps Customs and Border Protection crack down on fentanyl trafficking at the border.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Video Release: Sen. Johnson Holds Hearing Entitled “Voices of the Vaccine Injured”

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Wisconsin Ron Johnson
    WASHINGTON – Yesterday, U.S. Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), Chairman of the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, held a hearing entitled “Voices of the Vaccine Injured.” The Subcommittee heard from five witnesses who discussed vaccine injuries and two witnesses who discussed vaccine efficacy.
    “All of the witnesses presented powerful testimony and engaged in respectful discussion. I believe all of these stories needed to be told and listened to. I sincerely hope that the hearing helped to bridge the gap and demonstrate how to heal and unify our horribly divided nation,” Sen. Johnson said. 
    Clips of the witnesses’ testimonies can be found here. 
    Watch the full hearing here. 

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: President Trump Signs Cassidy’s HALT Fentanyl Act into Law

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Louisiana Bill Cassidy

    [embedded content]

    WASHINGTON – U.S. Senator Bill Cassidy, M.D. (R-LA) today joined President Trump at the White House for the signing of his HALT Fentanyl Act, which gives law enforcement another tool by permanently scheduling fentanyl-related substances (FRS) as Schedule I under the Controlled Substances Act. FRS have been temporarily scheduled since 2018, but Cassidy’s bill now gives law enforcement the certainty they need to stop fentanyl dealers.
    “President Trump and I are committed to stopping fentanyl overdoses and overdose related deaths,” said Dr. Cassidy. “My HALT Fentanyl Act, which he signed today, gives law enforcement one more tool to attack this problem.”

    Background
    The U.S. Senate passed Cassidy’s bill in March. In February, Cassidy spoke on the U.S. Senate floor amid Senate Democrats’ attempt to undermine his HALT Fentanyl Act.
    Drug overdoses, largely driven by fentanyl, are the leading cause of death among young adults 18 to 45 years old. Synthetic opioids like fentanyl account for 68 percent of the total U.S. overdose deaths. In the last two fiscal years, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) seized record amounts of fentanyl—nearly 50,000 pounds—enough to produce more than 2 billion lethal doses. According to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), in 2023 there were an estimated 107,543 drug overdose deaths—74,702 of which were attributed to fentanyl. This was primarily fueled by synthetic opioids, including illegal fentanyl, which are largely manufactured in Mexico from raw materials supplied by China. In 2022, there were over 50.6 million fentanyl-laced fake prescription pills seized by the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), more than doubling the amount seized in 2021.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Murphy: Trump is Surrendering American Soft Power to Our Adversaries and Destroying Senate Norms in the Process

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Connecticut – Chris Murphy
    [embedded content]
    WASHINGTON—U.S. Senator Chris Murphy (D-Conn.), a member of the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee, took to the floor of the U.S. Senate to speak out against President Trump’s unprecedented partisan rescissions package, which would codify devastating cuts to foreign aid and counter-propaganda efforts, surrendering American global power to China and our adversaries. Murphy also argued that Republicans’ bad faith exploitation of Senate rules imperils the bipartisan budget process, eroding longstanding Congressional norms and making it likely that Democrats will do the same when in power. 
    Murphy highlighted that Trump and Senate Republicans’ actions are unprecedented: “Never before has either party done what Republicans are doing today – pass a partisan rescissions bill, double crossing the minority party and cancelling spending that just months before, both parties had shook hands on…That’s a double cross. That’s immoral. Suckering your partner into a deal, in which you each get something, and then using the back door to cancel the part of the deal you don’t like. That’s immoral. That’s bad faith. And that’s why no party has done this in 40 years.”
    Laying out the stakes for longstanding Senate norms and the bipartisan budget process, Murphy continued: “It will become hard, maybe even impossible, to write a bipartisan budget ever again, because the minority party knows they can get double crossed. And believe me, if you do this now, Democrats will do it to you when we are back in charge.”
    Explaining why American soft power matters, Murphy said: “You need a lot more than just planes and tanks and ships to protect your interests. You need a powerful military, but adults – in particular, adults who have any experience in national security – know that the octopus of global power has a lot of arms. Military might. But also information might. Economic might. Diplomatic might. Energy might. Humanitarian might. This revisions bill cancels billions of dollars in investments in non-military foreign policy tools. And it is part of a broader effort by the Trump administration to destroy almost every tool that protects American interests other than our military…And this military myopia, it makes me remember my 8-year-old self, because it is so childish, so immature, so divorced from reality. Donald Trump’s national security strategy, fund the military and destroy every other way that we confront Russia, China, Iran, non-state actors, it could have been constructed by an 8-year-old. It’s that unsophisticated. And it really amounts to surrender.
    Noting how China is fast expanding their global power to capitalize on Trump’s surrender of American leadership, Murphy said: “China is now the preferred economic development partner for many nations. China is now the dominant force in standard-setting boards for global commerce. This is a choice the Trump administration is making, to make China – and to a certain extent Russia, in certain forms – the dominant power when it comes to economic statecraft, information statecraft, energy statecraft.” 
    Murphy continued: “Trump terminated tens of millions in projects to help upgrade Africa’s power grid. China’s not dumb. They know Africa’s economy is going to boom in the next fifty years. They want Chinese companies, not American companies to have relationships there. They know that many of the critical minerals that are going to be critical to AI and the future of defense come from Africa. They want better relations in Africa to corner those markets. So, what did they do? Trump pulled back $80 million. China stepped in and announced $50 billion in financing for economic development and infrastructure in Africa. Now, a lot of that is bluster and some of the financing is predatory. But it’s something. At a moment when America is just withdrawing from Africa.” 
    Murphy concluded: “Trump’s national security strategy—fund the military and destroy every other way that we confront Russia and China and non-state actors—could have been constructed by an 8-year-old. It’s that unsophisticated… It’s all surrender. China is throwing a blowout party as we disappear our non-military power from the world.”
    A full transcript of his remarks is available below.
    MURPHY: “Thank you, Mr. President.
    “Mr. President, eight times since 1974, when Congress created the rescissions process, one party has controlled the White House, the Senate, and the House of Representatives. Eight times. It’s actually four times Democratic control and four times Republican control. Eight times, one party had total control over the elements of the federal government necessary to pass legislation. And never before has either party done what Republicans are doing today: pass a partisan rescissions bill, double-crossing the minority party and canceling spending that just months before both parties shook hands on. 
    “Why? Why has this never happened before? Well, because this is just an old-fashioned double-cross. It’s a con job. Republicans and Democrats agreed on spending levels. First, in a bipartisan appropriations bill passed in March of 2023, and then again, in multiple bipartisan continuing resolutions. 
    “When a party controls the White House and both houses of Congress, it always has the power to use the rescissions process to pull a fast one. To agree with the minority party on a budget – because the rules say you need 60 votes to pass a budget – to get majority party priorities funded in exchange for funding minority party priorities, and then to use the rescissions process to just double-cross the minority, by using that process – which only requires 50 votes – to just then cancel the minority party’s priorities. 
    “That’s immoral. It’s unethical. Suckering your partner into a deal, in which you get something and they get something, and then using the back door to cancel the part of the deal that you don’t like. That’s bad faith. It’s why no party has it since 1972. The power has always existed: eight different times, either the Democratic Party or the Republican Party could have cut a bipartisan spending deal and then then used the rescissions power to just cancel the parts of the deal they don’t like. But it’s never happened. Because it’s bad faith, because it destroys the ability of the Senate to function in a bipartisan way. 
    “It’s kind of like if you traded baseball cards as a kid and you made a trade with your best friend. And then in the middle of the night, you snuck into his house and you took your cards back. So that you had his cards, and now you had your cards as well. Nobody would think that’s right, but that’s exactly what’s happening here.
    “It will become hard, maybe even impossible – Senator Tillis laid this out very well – to write a bipartisan budget ever again, because the minority party now knows that they can get double-crossed. And believe me, if Republicans do this now, Democrats are going to do it when they are in charge. This will become the norm. Sit down, do a bipartisan deal, wink wink, and then a couple months later, just cancel the agreement through a partisan rescissions process. 
    “And of course, this is now the third time in seven short months that the new Republican majority has made substantial, meaningful changes to Senate rules and norms.
    “Senate Republicans created a brand-new rule that massively expands their ability to invalidate actions of the previous Democratic administration.
    “Just a couple weeks ago, Republicans walked away from decades of precedent on how Senate bills are scored,  and they used new, magic math to create a score that hid the actual cost of their budget bill.
    “And now, this double cross.
    “But, Mr. President, this isn’t just about breaking the Senate. That’s actually probably the least serious consequence of what is happening here.
    “The most serious consequence is what is happening to American power around the world as Donald Trump and Republicans, in part through this rescissions bill, destroy every single non-military tool that we use around the world to protect our interests.
    “When I was eight or nine years old, I collected G.I. Joe figures, and one Christmas I remember being so excited because Santa Claus brought me the huge G.I. Joe aircraft carrier. It was awesome. I was obsessed with the military like a lot of boys that age. The planes, the tanks, the ships.
    “That’s what I thought American power was – the U.S. military, period, stop. 
    “And of course, that’s an eight-year-old’s view of the world. The world, as it turns out, is a lot more complicated. You need a lot more than just planes and tanks and ships to protect your interests. You need a powerful military, but adults – in particular, adults who have any experience in national security – know that the octopus of global power has a lot of arms. Military might. But also information might. Economic might. Diplomatic might. Energy might. Humanitarian might.
    “This revisions bill cancels billions of dollars in investments in non-military foreign policy tools. And it is part of a broader effort by the Trump administration to destroy almost every tool that protects American interests other than our military. Over the last 10 years, the defense budget has grown from about $502 billion to $825 billion. That’s an extraordinary ten-year increase of about $323 billion. Over that same period of time, the State Department budget has grown from $54 billion to $56 billion. – a $2 billion increase. Now if you layer in emergency funds, that increase is more like $30 billion. But you’re still talking about an increase for the military over the past ten years that is ten times the size of the increase for nonmilitary tools.
    “And this military myopia, it makes me remember my 8-year-old self, because it is so childish, so immature, so divorced from reality. Donald Trump’s national security strategy, fund the military and destroy every other way that we confront Russia, China, Iran, non-state actors, it could have been constructed by an 8-year-old. It’s that unsophisticated.
    “And it really amounts to surrender. 
    “Because as we stop projecting nonmilitary power around the world, China and Russia, but especially China, they just celebrate and step into the void. 
    “Secretary Rubio announced on March 10 that 83% of USAID programs will be terminated. 
    “Meanwhile, China just announced an 8.4% increase in its own diplomatic budget for 2025, committing 500 million additional dollars to the World Health Organization over the next five years – an organization that the United States no longer belongs to. As a result of our cuts standing next to China’s investments in diplomatic power, China will surpass the United States – this year for the first time – as the largest bilateral assistance partner for 40 countries. China is the power at the World Health organization. They call the shots about the standards of global health and pandemic relief. 
    “China is now the preferred economic development partner for many nations. China is now the dominant force in standard-setting boards for global commerce. This is a choice the Trump administration is making, to make China – and to a certain extent Russia, in certain forms – the dominant power when it comes to economic statecraft, information statecraft, energy statecraft. 
    “Let me give you a specific example. Today, information is power. If you control information flows, man, you control politics, you control economics, you control culture. 
    “China spends about $7 billion a year to promote their communist narrative to undermine U.S. leadership around the world and foster a China-friendly media environment globally. Russia, it’s really hard to know how much Russia spends because they’re not publicly reporting much of it. But they certainly spend at least $1.5 billion, but probably double that. And in many countries, Russia and China control the information space. Russian-backed candidates win elections in countries on their periphery simply because of Russian information programs. Asian countries box the United States and U.S. companies out of economic competition because of Chinese information programs.
    “And so faced with China and Russia spending somewhere in the neighborhood of $10 billion, when the United States, today, is spending only a fraction of that amount of money, it would stand to reason this would be a moment where we should come together, Republicans and Democrats, and dramatically increase our information warfare investments.
    “But of course, we are doing exactly the opposite. Trump is in the middle of a purposeful, relentless campaign to destroy – to destroy America’s global information power. 
    “The Trump administration just shut down the Global Engagement Center – that is the capacity at the State Department to try to counter Russian and Chinese propaganda around the world – gone, just gone. Global Engagement Center, bipartisan commitment set up years ago by myself and Rob Portman, supported by Marco Rubio when he was a senator, now just doesn’t exist anymore. The administration is dismantling the U.S. Agency for Global Media – that’s the umbrella arm that oversees our information programs around the world – they laid off 92% of its staff. Voice of America, the Middle East Broadcasting Network, Radio Free Europe, Radio Free Asia, they are on track to disappear. The arm of the VOA that combats Iranian anti-American information – gone. 54 different radio frequencies operated by Radio Free Asia to counter Chinese anti-American propaganda – gone. 
    At the same time, China is opening up 80 new radio frequencies in multiple languages, including in those regions where America is disappearing. We are handed the world to China and Russia by deciding to view American power only through a military lens. And this rescissions bill makes it worse by enacting billions of dollars of cuts, to diplomacy, to economic development programs, likely to information programs because we actually can’t see the impact of all of these cuts. 
    “It’s all surrender. China is throwing a blowout party as we disappear our nonmilitary power from the world. 
    “Trump terminated tens of millions of dollars in projects to upgrade Africa’s power grid. What did China do? They announced $50 billion of new financing for Africa. Africa, a place where the critical minerals exist to power A.I. and future defense systems. Africa, the part of the world whose economy’s going to explode with opportunity – now opportunity that will go to Chinese companies, not American companies, as we withdraw our relationships with that continent. As China steps into the breach. 
    “This revisions bill, standing next to Trump’s destruction of all of our non-military foreign policy tools, it’s surrender to our enemies. 
    “This bill is a double-cross. It is. It’s a double-cross. It’s going to harm our ability to ever be able to do a bipartisan budget process in the future. But even worse, this bill is surrender to our adversaries who are chomping at the bit to fill the void that we are creating by adopting the national security strategy of an 8-year-old boy.”

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Video: Kaine Grills Trump Administration Over Incineration of Food for Starving Children

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Virginia Tim Kaine

    BROADCAST-QUALITY VIDEO OF THE EXCHANGE IS AVAILABLE HERE.

    WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, U.S. Senator Tim Kaine (D-VA), a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee (SFRC), grilled Deputy Secretary of State for Management and Resources Michael Rigas over the Trump Administration’s order to incinerate 500 metric tons of emergency food, which the U.S. had already purchased to feed starving children. Reuters reported in May that the food was being stored at a United States Agency for International Development (USAID) warehouse in Dubai and was set to expire in July. The news of the incineration of this food was reported on Monday by The Atlantic.

    “Yesterday, The Atlantic reported that the expiration date on those 500 tons of nutritious food for starving kids was now upon us, and the U.S. had decided to incinerate that food rather than allow starving children to have it,” said Kaine. “Mr. Rigas, you’re the Deputy Secretary for Management and Resources. These are resources that were purchased with U.S. taxpayer dollars. They’re specifically designed to save the lives of starving children. Why is it a good use of resources to not distribute that food to kids and instead burn it?”

    Rigas responded, “I’d have to look into that particular issue and see how those foodstuffs got there.”

    “I asked this question at a hearing yesterday so you would be prepared to know that I would ask it today, and we called your office to tell you that I would ask it today. So the notion that you need to look into it strikes me as a little bit odd. As you sit here today, is that food being distributed to kids or is it being incinerated?” Kaine asked.

    “If it’s been expired, my understanding is it’s the policy of the government to not distribute expired food or medicine,” Rigas responded.

    “We’ve been asking Secretary Rubio about this back into March. Since it has been known for months that this food would have an expiration date, why has the State Department decided to burn it rather than distribute it to starving children?” Kaine pressed.

    “I don’t have a good answer for that question,” Rigas said. “I am as distressed about that as you are.”

    Rigas continued, “I think that this was just a casualty of the shutdown of USAID.”

    “I view at as an intentional thing,” Kaine continued. “It’s not a mistake if you’ve been on notice of it for two months, and you’ve made the decision to keep the warehouse locked and allow this food to be destroyed rather than … feed at least 27,000 acutely malnourished children for a month.”

    “I’d have to look into what the facts of the matter were,” Rigas responded.

    “Sometimes the tiniest detail really exposes the soul,” Kaine concluded. “A government that is put on notice—here are resources that will save 27,000 starving kids. Can you please distribute them or give them to someone who can? Who decides, ‘no, we would rather keep the warehouse locked, let the food expire, and then burn it?’ To me, that really exposes the soul of this endeavor.”

    Rigas concluded by saying that he would look into it and find out what happened.

    Video of Kaine raising The Atlantic’s reporting during the July 15 SFRC nominations hearing for U.S. Representative Michael Waltz to be the U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations, Mr. John Arrigo to be U.S. Ambassador to Portugal, and Ms. Christine Toretti to be U.S. Ambassador to Sweden is available here.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Kaine Statement on Trump Administration Illegally Withholding $140 Million in Federal Funding to Address Fentanyl Crisis

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Virginia Tim Kaine

    WASHINGTON, D.C.— Today, U.S. Senator Tim Kaine (D-VA), a member of the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee, released the following statement regarding the Trump Administration’s illegal withholding of $140 million in federal funding passed by Congress to support fentanyl overdose response efforts:

    “I’m relieved that thanks to steps we took during the Biden Administration—including the passage of my Disrupt Fentanyl Trafficking Act—that fentanyl overdose deaths in Virginia have declined significantly. But one overdose death is too many, and it’s inexplicable that the Trump Administration is illegally withholding $140 million in federal funding to build on our progress and better protect communities from fentanyl. The fact that this news is being reported immediately after President Trump signed into law massive tax cuts for billionaires—paid for with cuts to programs working families rely on—makes it crystal clear who this Administration values. I’ll be doing all that I can to encourage my Republican colleagues to join me in raising hell about this decision to hamstring our efforts to address the fentanyl crisis.”

    Kaine has long advocated for more resources to combat the fentanyl crisis. Kaine introduced and Congress passed the bipartisan Disrupt Fentanyl Trafficking Act to direct increased federal attention to fentanyl trafficking by declaring fentanyl trafficking a national security threat, utilizing Pentagon resources like counter-drug intelligence, and involving Mexico as an active partner to combat the crisis. Kaine also helped pass a supplemental national security funding package that included the FEND Off Fentanyl Act, bipartisan legislation cosponsored by Kaine, to require the President to sanction drug rings involved in international drug trafficking. In July 2024, Kaine traveled to Brownsville and McAllen, Texas to discuss fentanyl interdiction at the southern border with various law enforcement agencies and international partners from Mexico. In March 2024, Kaine also introduced the bipartisan Strengthening Tracking Of Poisonous Tranq Requiring Analyzed National Quantification Act, or the STOP TRANQ Act to require the State Department to include reporting on xylazine, or “tranq,” in its annual International Narcotics Control Strategy Report (INCSR). In February, Kaine introduced the bipartisan, bicameral Combating Illicit Xylazine Act, which would list xylazine as a Schedule III controlled substance while protecting the drug’s legal use by veterinarians, farmers, and ranchers.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Senator Collins, Colleagues Write to OMB Urging Release of Critical Education Funding

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Maine Susan Collins

    Washington, D.C. – U.S. Senator Susan Collins, Chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee, joined Senator Shelley Moore Capito (R-WV) and eight of her Senate colleagues in sending a letter to Russell Vought, Director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), advocating for the release of paused education formula funding, which states had anticipated receiving on July 1. The pause could result in a loss of nearly $28,000,000 for Maine’s public schools.

    Specifically, the letter requests that the Administration faithfully implement the Fiscal Year (FY) 2025 Full-Year Continuing Resolution Act, which President Trump signed into law earlier this year. This legislation contains critical funding that states and local school districts rely on to help students, families, and local economies.

    “The Continuing Resolution contained funding for Supporting Effective Instruction State Grants; 21st Century Community Learning Centers; Student Support and Academic Enrichment Grants; English Language Acquisition; Migrant Education; Adult Basic and Literacy Education State Grants (including Integrated English Literacy and Civics Education State Grants). Withholding these funds will harm students, families, and local economies,” the Senators wrote.

    “The decision to withhold this funding is contrary to President Trump’s goal of returning K-12 education to the states. This funding goes directly to states and local school districts, where local leaders decide how this funding is spent, because as we know, local communities know how to best serve students and families. Withholding this funding denies states and communities the opportunity to pursue localized initiatives to support students and their families,” they continued.

    “We welcome the opportunity to work with you and Secretary McMahon to ensure that all federal education funding goes towards programs that help states and school districts provide students an excellent education. We want to see students in our states and across the country thrive, whether they are adult learners, students who speak English as a second language, or students who need after-school care so that their parents can work. We believe you share the same goal. We encourage you to reverse your decision and release this Congressionally-approved funding to states,” the Senators concluded.

    In addition to Senators Collins and Capito, the letter was signed by Senators John Boozman (R-AR), Katie Britt (R-AL), Deb Fischer (R-NE), John Hoeven (R-ND), Jim Justice (R-WV), Mitch McConnell (R-KY), Lisa Murkowski (R-AK), and Mike Rounds (R-SD).

    The complete text of the letter can be read here.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Padilla, Schiff, Booker, Markey Lead 28 Senate Colleagues in Effort to Protect California’s Proposition 12

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator Alex Padilla (D-Calif.)

    Padilla, Schiff, Booker, Markey Lead 28 Senate Colleagues in Effort to Protect California’s Proposition 12

    Senators: “The Food Security and Farm Protection Act would harm America’s small farmers and infringe on the fundamental rights of states to establish laws and regulations within their own borders.”

    This letter follows an announcement last week from the Trump Administration seeking to undermine Proposition 12 and other state laws.

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — U.S. Senators Alex Padilla (D-Calif.), Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), Cory Booker (D-N.J.), and Edward J. Markey (D-Mass.) led 28 of their Senate colleagues in strongly objecting to the inclusion of the Food Security and Farm Protection Act in the next Farm Bill or in any other legislation. This letter follows a frivolous Trump Administration lawsuit announced last week seeking to undermine Proposition 12 and other state laws.  

    In a letter to Senate Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry Committee Chair John Boozman (R-Ark.) and Ranking Member Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), the Senators raised concerns over the risk this legislation poses to California’s Proposition 12, Massachusetts’ Question 3, and other similar laws nationwide that allow states regulate their own food standards. They also highlighted how undermining these measures would hurt American farmers who have long met the standards set by Proposition 12 or who already invested in resources to comply.  

    “This legislation would have a sweeping impact if passed—threatening countless state laws and opening the floodgates to unnecessary litigation. The bill is particularly draconian in that it aims to negate state and local laws when there are no federal standards to take their place, creating an overnight regulatory vacuum,” wrote the Senators. “In doing so, it would drastically broaden the scope of federal preemption, and disregard the wisdom of duly-enacted laws that address local concerns.” 

    “Countless farmers who wanted to take advantage of this market opportunity invested resources and made necessary modifications to be compliant. Federal preemption of these laws would be picking the winners and losers, and would seriously harm farmers who made important investments,” continued the Senators. 

    Fifteen states, including California, have implemented public health, food safety, and human standards for the in-state production and sale of certain products, following demands from consumers, food companies, and farmers. These standards include consumer information safeguards, food quality and safety regulations, animal welfare standards, and more.  

    In addition to Padilla, Schiff, Booker, and Markey, the letter is signed by Senators Angela Alsobrooks (D-Md.), Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), Lisa Blunt Rochester (D-Del.), Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.), Christopher Coons (D-Del.), Tammy Duckworth (D-Ill.), John Fetterman (D-Pa.), Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.), Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.), Maggie Hassan (D-N.H.), Martin Heinrich (D-N.M), Mazie Hirono (D-Hawaii), Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.), Andy Kim (D-N.J.), Angus King (I-Maine), Jeffrey Merkley (D-Ore.), Chris Murphy (D-Conn.), Patty Murray (D-Wash.), Gary Peters (D-Mich.), Ben Ray Luján (D-N.M.), Jack Reed (D-R.I.), Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii), Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.), Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Peter Welch (D-Vt.), Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.), and Ron Wyden (D-Ore.).

    Full text of the letter is available here and below:     

    Dear Chairman Boozman and Ranking Member Klobuchar: 

    We write today expressing our strong opposition to inclusion of the “Food Security and Farm Protection Act” (S. 1326), previously known as the “Ending Agricultural Trade Suppression Act (EATS) Act,” or any similar legislation in the next Farm Bill. Modeled after former Representative Steve King’s amendment, which was intensely controversial and ultimately excluded from the final 2014 and 2018 Farm Bills, the Food Security and Farm Protection Act would harm America’s small farmers and infringe on the fundamental rights of states to establish laws and regulations within their own borders. 

    This legislation would have a sweeping impact if passed—threatening countless state laws and opening the floodgates to unnecessary litigation. The bill is particularly draconian in that it aims to negate state and local laws when there are no federal standards to take their place, creating an overnight regulatory vacuum. In doing so, it would drastically broaden the scope of federal preemption, and disregard the wisdom of duly-enacted laws that address local concerns.  

    The range of potentially impacted laws includes measures aimed at protecting states from invasive pests and infectious disease, health and safety standards, consumer information safeguards, food quality and safety regulations, animal welfare standards, and fishing regulations. Below are just a few of the many areas that could be impacted by the Food Security and Farm Protection Act:  

    • Alabama, Iowa, Nebraska, and South Dakota regulate the labeling of bitter almonds or prohibit their sale as a poison. Florida prohibits the sale of citrus fruits containing arsenic. 
    • Arkansas, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Indiana, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New York, Oregon, Utah, Vermont and Wisconsin have laws that restrict the importation of firewood in order to prevent the spread of invasive pests and diseases. Additionally, at least 23 states have restrictions on the importation of Ash trees in order to prevent the spread of the emerald ash borer. Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, South Carolina and Texas are among states that have passed laws to prevent the spread of the Asian citrus psyllid, which causes citrus greening, and many states have implemented regulations to protect iconic species of trees that grow in various regions of the United States.  
    • Arkansas, Kansas, Louisiana, Pennsylvania, and Texas have laws governing sales within their states of seeds and seed oils. Dozens of states have enacted laws on noxious weeds, rules for spraying manure on fields, sourcing requirements, and many other agricultural matters. 
    • Many states impose additional requirements beyond federal regulations to address risks to cattle from brucellosis (48 states), bovine tuberculosis (41 states), and Johne’s Disease (North Dakota, Wisconsin, and Wyoming).  

    Demand from consumers, food companies, and the farming community has propelled 15 states to enact public health, food safety, and humane standards for the in-state production and sale of products from egg-laying chickens, veal calves, and sows. The Food Security and Farm Protection Act was introduced with the primary goal of undermining these standards – particularly California’s Proposition 12, in response to the Supreme Court’s recent decision upholding that law, and Massachusetts’s Question 3. Last Congress, the House Agriculture Committee included a similarly harmful provision in their Farm Bill draft, adding another poison pill that contributed to a lack of progress on the next Farm Bill.  

    California’s Proposition 12 has been in full effect for over a year, while Massachusetts’s Question 3 has been in full effect since 2023. The demand for Proposition 12- and Question 3- compliant products has been met. Countless farmers who wanted to take advantage of this market opportunity invested resources and made necessary modifications to be compliant. Federal preemption of these laws would be picking the winners and losers, and would seriously harm farmers who made important investments.  

    Due to these concerns, we respectfully ask that you reject inclusion of this provision in any form, as you did in the 2014 and 2018 Farm Bills.  

    Thank you, and we look forward to working with you to pass a bipartisan Farm Bill. 

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: ICYMI: Padilla Joins LA Times’ Making LA Podcast: “From Pacoima to Power”

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator Alex Padilla (D-Calif.)

    What happens when a Pacoima kid turned MIT-trained engineer brings a wonk’s brain — and a line cook’s work ethic — into the halls of power?

    Listen to the full podcast here

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — In case you missed it, U.S. Senator Alex Padilla (D-Calif.) recently sat down for the inaugural episode of the LA Times’ Making LA Podcast to discuss his journey from growing up in Pacoima in the San Fernando Valley as the proud son of immigrants from Mexico to rising through Los Angeles and California politics to become the state’s senior U.S. Senator. The interview took place at the Discovery Cube in the San Fernando Valley, a hands-on children’s science museum Senator Padilla helped found.

    Padilla walked through his family’s history, sharing that his dad spent 40 years as a short order cook while his mom cleaned houses to provide for their family. His parents emphasized the importance of a good education, and he attended the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) where he earned a Bachelor of Science degree in Mechanical Engineering.

    Padilla discussed his political rise beginning with serving as former Representative Tony Cárdenas’ campaign manager for his longshot State Assembly campaign in 1996, then becoming a member of the Los Angeles City Council in 1999, and serving as the youngest person ever elected as City Council President just two years later. As City Council President, Padilla was acting Mayor of Los Angeles during the September 11, 2001 attacks, reassuring the city as residents feared Los Angeles could be targeted next. Padilla also detailed his work in the State Senate — including successful bills to require restaurant chains to display nutrition and caloric information for their menu items and to transform the transfer process from community colleges to four-year universities — as well as expanding voting access and resisting Republicans’ attacks on the right to vote during his tenure as California’s Secretary of State.

    Now serving as California’s senior U.S. Senator, Padilla reflected on being sworn in just two weeks after the January 6 insurrection. He emphasized that he continues to fight on behalf of his 40 million constituents and is working to convince others to join him to fight for climate resilience, voting rights, infrastructure investments, wildfire prevention and response, and comprehensive immigration reform. Padilla shared that behind closed doors, his Republican colleagues agree on the need to reform our outdated immigration system, and committed to keep fighting to pass his Citizenship for Essential Workers Act, his first bill introduced in Congress.

    Listen to the full podcast here.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Cramer Welcomes Governor Armstrong at EPW Hearing, Questions Witnesses on EV Registration Fee and Permitting

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator Kevin Cramer (R-ND)

    ***Click here for audio. Click here for video***

    WASHINGTON, D.C. – The Senate Environment and Public Works (EPW) Committee held a hearing to discuss the development of the Surface Transportation Reauthorization Bill.

    U.S. Senator Kevin Cramer (R-ND), Chair of the EPW Transportation and Infrastructure Subcommittee, introduced the first witness, North Dakota Governor Kelly Armstrong (R-ND).

    “What’s interesting to me about Governor Armstrong is he’s not naturally a politician at all,” said Cramer. “In fact, he’s quite naturally the opposite. […] But Governor Armstrong brings that perspective, and as I look forward to hearing from the mayor, I think for all of us up here, it’s really, really important to remember that there’s probably no better illustration of the juxtaposition of the relationship between the federal government, local and state governments than in infrastructure.

    “Kelly brings that very important perspective from a rural state that produces a lot of things that we don’t consume in our own state, or at least we don’t consume nearly in the supply that we provide to a hungry world and a growing economy,” continued Cramer. “Whether it’s energy or food or how you get durum wheat to turn into semolina flour to get it to a pasta plant, to get it to the restaurant in New York. He understands it all, and he understands the relationship. I’m really grateful he’s here.”

    [embedded content]

    Cramer first mentioned the importance of providing highway funds to states through a set formula, an approach he worked to maintain under the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act. This approach ensures states have consistent funding and flexibility to meet their constituents needs. 

    Cramer then began his questioning by addressing the broader challenge of funding the nation’s transportation infrastructure. He discussed how the highway system is built on a user-pays model, with drivers contributing to the Highway Trust Fund (HTF) through the federal gas tax paid at the pump.  However, he noted current revenue is not adequate to meet national needs, and electric and hybrid vehicles use the roads and bridges but pay less into the system.

    He asked witnesses to weigh in with solutions for increasing HTF revenue and ensuring all drivers contribute fairly. Cramer noted many states, including North Dakota, charge registration fees for electric vehicles (EVs) and hybrids so they are paying into the system. While gas taxes are paid at both the state and federal level, there is no mechanism at the federal level accounting for EVs’ use of roads and bridges.

    [embedded content]

    “Every car, combustion or otherwise, is driving a lot more on that 18.3 cents that is being taken in,” said Armstrong. “And I think as you get more and more other vehicles on the road, there is going to be a disparity there. […] I think whatever four-tired vehicle that ends up on the road is going to utilize that road and is going to require maintenance and upkeep and all of those things.”

    “It’s important to me that we adequately fund the National Highway Trust Fund,” said Kate Gallego, Mayor of the City of Phoenix. “We would like to make sure it’s adequate funding, we want to protect privacy, any new solution, we think technology needs to be ready to go on day one. This is so essential we have to get it right.”

    Cramer concluded by asking witnesses if they have closing recommendations for accelerating the delivery of infrastructure projects.

    “You know, this is a really complicated topic, but I actually think the solutions are pretty simple,” said Austin Ramirez, President and CEO of Husco, an engineering and manufacturing company. “We need deadlines in the regulatory process that are enforceable, and we need limited expedited judicial review. I think if we do those two things, we’ll actually get infrastructure dollars from being approved and allocated to actually being spent and invested in new projects.”

    “I think you all have a unique opportunity, because a lot of the fights that are associated with infrastructure reform don’t apply to roads, but try getting a bridge permitted across the federal waterway,” responded Armstrong. “And we’re not building new ones, we’re replacing the existing one. But every one of our constituents wants this kind of infrastructure and you don’t get into some of the ideological fights that exist in transmission or pipelines.”

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Cortez Masto Calls Out Republicans for Voting Down Her Amendment to Protect Public Broadcasting’s Public Safety Programs

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Nevada Cortez Masto

    FTP for TV stations of her remarks is available here.

    Washington, D.C. – Today, U.S. Senator Cortez Masto (D-Nev.) called out Senate Republicans for refusing to protect public broadcasting funding and stand up for public safety and law enforcement. Across the country, public broadcasters help deliver vital local emergency alerts, AMBER Alerts, and important information during emergencies. These efforts help save lives, as well as protect our first responders and law enforcement. Cortez Masto introduced a commonsense amendment stating that Republicans’ gutting of funding from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting cannot advance if it impacts public safety, but Republicans voted to oppose it.

    “For years, public broadcasting has been essential to keeping Americans informed during severe weather and environmental threats, and broader public safety situations,” said Senator Cortez Masto. “Now is not the time to claw back funding that this body has already approved for public broadcasting’s emergency alert system.”

    In 2024, over 11,000 alerts were issued by federal, state, and local authorities through the PBS Warning, Alert, Response Network (WARN) system alone. From California to Kentucky to North Carolina, public broadcasting alert systems deliver timely alerts directly to Americans’ TVs, radios, and cell phones that have saved lives during natural disasters by providing crucial safety information to people in the area. Public broadcasting stations also work with law enforcement to get information out related to abducted children, missing seniors, and major acts of violence. The interconnected public broadcasting system is uniquely capable of broadcasting alerts to every corner of the nation.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Reed, Environmental Leaders Tout Importance of BEACH Grant Clean Water Monitoring Program

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Rhode Island Jack Reed

    As Trump seeks to eliminate BEACH grants and cut funding to stop sewage overflows and runoff pollution, Reed seeks to keep clean water monitoring system afloat and restore clean water funding investments

    WASHINGTON, DC – As more people head to coastal beaches, Great Lakes, and local waterways to enjoy the summer weather, U.S. Senator Jack Reed (D-RI) is leading federal efforts to help ensure America’s swimming beaches remain clean, safe, and welcoming to the public and protect human health, environmental health, and the economic health of coastal communities. 

    Today, outside the U.S. Capitol, Senator Reed joined Environment America, NCAA athletes who train in open waters, public health advocates, and fellow members of Congress to discuss the importance of the Beaches Environmental Assessment and Coastal Health (BEACH) Act grant program to help monitor beach water quality nationwide. VIDEO AVAILABLE.

    Federal BEACH grants support beach water-quality collection, testing, and monitoring and public notification efforts if bacteria levels become unsafe.

    “The BEACH Act is a smart investment in protecting public health, economic health, and the health of our waterways.  It ensures people are informed when temporary beach closures are warranted and provides policymakers with the data needed to ensure sound management,” said Senator Reed, a member of the Appropriations Subcommittee on Interior and Environment, which oversees federal BEACH Act funding.  Reed and his fellow appropriators helped make $9.7 million in BEACH grant funding for water quality monitoring at coastal and Great Lakes beaches in 2025 and he and several colleagues requested at least $15 million for BEACH grants in Fiscal Year 2026.  “Clean, safe beaches are an economic and environmental imperative.  I oppose President Trump’s attempt to eliminate BEACH grants and clean water infrastructure funds.  Fixing and updating water systems isn’t cheap or easy.  But it’s absolutely essential to public health, environmental health, and America’s economic well-being.”

    “There’s nothing better than running into the water with your friends and family on a hot day in summer, but too often, our favorite beaches aren’t safe for swimming,” said Lisa Frank, executive director of Environment America, a non-profit that recently released its annual Safe for Swimming? report on the water quality of America’s beaches. “Keeping sewage pollution out of our waterways isn’t rocket science, but it’s clear more investment is needed to protect our health.”

    “Growing up on the shores of Lake Erie, I’ve always had a deep appreciation for our beaches. These natural wonders are invaluable sources of recreation and economic drivers for our communities, but pollution and contamination threaten to make them too dangerous for the public,” said U.S. Representative Dave Joyce (R-OH). “I urge Congress to swiftly pass the BEACH Act, which will ensure that our beaches and the surrounding waters remain safe for future generations.”

    “As a Division-1 rower, being able to train on a waterway without fear of exposure to nasty bacteria is vital to my well-being,” said Jordan Stock, a student athlete at Stanford University. “I should not have to risk my health to practice the sport that I love. From competitive water athletes like myself, to the local businesses sustained by beach tourism and clean water, to casual swimmers, surfers and sailors, this issue affects everyone.” 

    Common issues that make waterways unsafe include sewer overflows and runoff pollution.  Swimming in waters contaminated with elevated levels of enterococci bacteria can cause gastrointestinal illness, according to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), which administers BEACH grants to coastal and Great Lake states based on a formula that includes the length of the recipients’ beach season, number of miles of shoreline, and population. Recipients must also have an EPA- approved water quality standards program.

    Researchers estimate that people get sick 57 million times a year from swimming in polluted waters and Environment America released a new study showing nearly two-thirds of U.S. beaches (1,930 out of 3,187) experienced fecal contamination at some point last year, with roughly 1 in 7 beaches — 453 of those sampled — experiencing potentially unsafe fecal contamination on at least 25 percent of the days on which testing occurred.

    Since Senator Reed helped launch the BEACH Act in 2001, over $225 million in BEACH grants have been awarded to test beach waters for illness-causing bacteria, identify the sources of pollution problems, and help notify the public.  This year’s continuing resolution appropriated nearly $10 million in BEACH Act funds, resulting in $210,000 for Rhode Island.  But now, the Trump Administration is trying to eliminate the program.

    Nationwide, Gulf Coast beaches experienced the biggest share of unsafe water quality days in 2024 — 84 percent of Gulf Coast beaches experienced at least one unsafe swimming day — while just 10 percent of Alaska and Hawaii’s beaches had an unsafe day.

    Rhode Island’s coastal beach-water quality monitoring program is managed by the Rhode Island Department of Health and works closely with the state’s Department of Environmental Management (DEM), cities, towns, and volunteer groups.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Reed Blasts Republicans’ Attempt to Defund Public Broadcasting & Humanitarian Aid

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Rhode Island Jack Reed

    VIDEO: Sen. Reed speaks out on Senate floor in opposition to Trump’s rescissions package that would eliminate life-saving global health programs, peacekeeping efforts, and economic development abroad, and undercut community-focused TV and radio stations

    WASHINGTON, DC – Ahead of a July 18 deadline, Senate Republicans are rushing to pass a rescissions package to claw back roughly $9 billion in humanitarian aid and funding for public broadcasting.  Senate Republicans advanced the proposal last night on a 50-50 vote with three Senate Republicans joining all Democrats and Independents opposing the measure, but with Vice President Vance breaking the tie.

    U.S. Senator Jack Reed (D-RI) is urging lawmakers on both sides of the aisle to “oppose this partisan rescission bill because it represents a complete surrender of Congress’s power of the purse.  It will hurt America’s standing in the world and it will cost lives,” Reed said today on the Senate floor.  “We are considering this package at a time when the Trump Administration has frozen congressionally enacted funds, illegally impounded funds, and threatened to cancel unspent funds at the end of fiscal year.  Now, the Administration is back asking Congress to ratify even more cuts.” 

    Reed is urging Senators to vote for their constituents best interests and against the Trump Administration’s rescission package, which includes cuts to public television and radio funds that Congress previously authorized and appropriated. 

    The Trump Administration’s attempt to defund public media investment would revoke about $1.1 billion in previously-appropriated funding for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB), including over $1 million annually for Rhode Island TV and radio stations.

    Congress provided CPB approximately $535 million in in federal support for each of the next two fiscal years to disburse across nearly 1,500 local radio and TV stations nationwide, as well as programmers and technology infrastructure providers.  Cutting this funding in the upcoming two fiscal years could force some local stations off the air, while other stations may have fewer shows to broadcast and fewer resources for local news reporting and educational programming.

    Speaking on the Senate floor today, Reed stated: “This bill will eliminate close to $1.1 billion in funding for the Corporation of Public Broadcasting. This would not simply affect funding for National Public Radio and national PBS, it would result in funding cuts for local stations like Rhode Island PBS and the Public’s Radio, which lose about 10 percent of its funding if this bill passes.  The same story will play out in every state with independent local news and civic discourse taking the hit just because of the President’s command to the majority party.”

    Reed also noted that public radio is decentralized.  Stations in Kansas are covering local issues, with local personalities, differently than public broadcasters in Rhode Island or other states.

    Since 2013, public TV stations have helped the Wireless Emergency Alert (WEA) system deliver emergency alerts to people’s cell phones via the stations’ own transmitters when cell companies’ connections fail.

    In 2024, over 11,000 alerts were issued by federal, state, and local authorities via the PBS WARN system. Similarly, the Public Radio Satellite System (PRSS), which is managed by NPR, helps send presidential emergency alerts to local public radio stations nationwide—allowing critical communications to reach people, even when the internet or cellular connections fail.

    Reed asked: “In the wake of deadly flooding in Texas and elsewhere do my colleagues really want to support a package that cuts funding for emergency alerts?”

    The bill would also cut $7.9 billion from the kind of global assistance programs that are crucial to U.S. national security and our efforts to compete with China economically and diplomatically.

    These programs are also the embodiment of American idealism and morality.  As Catholic Relief Services wrote: “If passed, these rescissions drastically decrease U.S. investment in international assistance programs that support human dignity, protect life and build good will with countries around the world. Not only that, these cuts and other measures to eliminate international assistance programs also represent a retreat of the U.S. as a global leader in addressing poverty around the world. This would undermine decades of work in serving the global community and fostering a peaceful and prosperous world.”

    The cuts on the table include $500 million from global health programs, which could affect efforts that have successfully slowed the spread of infectious diseases, along with cuts to lifesaving humanitarian assistance.

    One proven program that could see drastic cuts under this rescissions package is the disbursement of Ready-to-Use Therapeutic Food (RUTF). RUTF is a specialty product used to treat severe malnutrition in children, and could be impacted by the proposed cuts to UNICEF included in Trump’s package.

    “Unfortunately, we have already seen this Administration’s disregard for the lifesaving treatment provided by RUTF.  Edesia Nutrition, a key manufacturer of RUTF based in Rhode Island, has been forced to curtail production and delay shipments of lifesaving therapeutic food, which has sat in warehouses, unable to get to the children who need it because of the Trump Administration’s needless slow-walking.  If OMB really cared about waste, it wouldn’t have this food aid and the millions of tons of wheat and other crops sitting and rotting rather than distributing it,” said Senator Reed, noting these are American-made products made by American workers, using domestically produced food, to prevent millions of at-risk, malnourished children from starving to death.

    “These cuts are shortsighted, there is no other way to put it. To paraphrase former Secretary of Defense Mattis, ‘if we don’t fund these soft power and diplomatic programs, then we need to buy more ammunition,’” concluded Reed.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Reed Statement on FY26 National Defense Authorization Act

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Rhode Island Jack Reed

    WASHINGTON, DC—Today, U.S. Senators Jack Reed (D-RI) and Roger Wicker (R-MS), the Ranking Member and Chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, announced that they have filed S. 2296, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2026 (NDAA).

    Senator Reed issued the following statement after filing the bill:

    “This year’s National Defense Authorization Act represents a strong, bipartisan commitment to ensuring our military remains focused on its core mission: defending the United States against the growing threats we face around the world. From strategic competition with China and Russia to emerging dangers in cyberspace and space, this bill equips our forces to meet today’s challenges with strength and resolve.

    “This legislation also restores important guardrails for the Department of Defense and reaffirms the military’s independence and professionalism. It ensures resources are directed toward real national security priorities, not partisan agendas. I’m proud to have worked with colleagues on both sides of the aisle to get this done, and to ensure that America’s military remains strong, focused, and worthy of the trust the American people place in it.”

    The FY26 NDAA authorizes $879 billion for the Department of Defense (DOD) and $35 billion for national security programs within the Department of Energy (DOE).  

    Highlights include:

    • Authorizes procurement of five Columbia-class submarines and $2.02 billion for aVirginia-class submarine, an increase of $1.2 billion over the budget request.
    • Provides a 3.8 percent pay raise for military servicemembers.
    • Expands efforts to mitigate and treat traumatic brain injuries and blast overpressure-related injuries.
    • Authorizes full funding for the Pacific Deterrence Initiative (PDI) and provides support to advance the U.S. partnerships with Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, and the Philippines, and directs an initiative to strengthen security cooperation across the respective defense industrial bases of U.S. allies and partners in the Indo-Pacific.
    • Extends the Ukraine Security Assistance Initiative (USAI) through 2028 and increases USAI funding to $500 million in FY 2026.
    • Reaffirms that it is the policy of the United States to assist Ukraine in maintaining a credible defense and deterrence capability, and requires DOD to continue to provide intelligence support, including information, intelligence, and imagery collection to Ukraine.
    • Limits the use of funds to reduce or consolidate U.S. force presence in Syria unless the Secretary of Defense certifies that Syrian partners forces can still effectively counter the threat from ISIS.
    • Directs DOD to use all available authorities to provide assistance, including training, equipment, logistics support, and supplies, to support and enhance the military forces of Jordan and Lebanon and provide a plan for how to implement that assistance.
    • Requires reports and provides greater resources for developing UAS technologies and responding to drone incursions.
    • Expands DOD’s artificial intelligence (AI) resources and establishes new DOD authorities to coordinate AI initiatives among U.S. allies and partners.
    • Supports reproductive healthcare by establishing a comprehensive in-vitro fertilization (IVF) healthcare benefit for active-duty servicemembers and their families.

    Oversight of the Trump Administration:

    • Prohibits any reduction in U.S. military force posture in Europe or the Korean Peninsula below 76,000 and 28,500 personnel, respectively, and prohibits any change in the U.S. military leadership of NATO or the Combined Forces Command – Korea without certain conditions. Further directs the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs and the Commanders of U.S. European Command, Indo-Pacific Command, and U.S. Forces Korea to conduct independent risk assessments of any such changes.
    • Fences 25 percent of the travel budget for the Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD) until the Secretary provides a bilaterally agreed 5-year Taiwan Security Assistance Roadmap and a number of other overdue reports, including a report on DOD efforts to identify, disseminate, and implement lessons learned from the war in Ukraine.
    • Requires DOD to report its incurred costs from supporting the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) in immigration enforcement activities; the number of migrants held at DOD installations and the associated costs; approved Requests for Assistance from DHS to support immigration enforcement operations; and the costs of using military aircraft and facilities to support DHS immigration enforcement operations.
    • Reinstates mandatory training for all military members on rules of engagement, domestic military operations, the code of conduct, and government ethics to protect against escalation during domestic operations.
    • Requires the Secretary of Defense to implement the renaming recommendations for military bases in Virginia that were adopted by the Naming Commission, and prohibits the Secretary of Defense from changing those names.
    • Requires the Secretary of Defense to submit a minimum of 5 days notice to Congress if a military Judge Advocate General (JAG) is being removed, and a statement of the reason for the removal.
    • Requires the President to notify Congress of the removal of a member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the reason for the removal not later than 5 days after the removal.
    • Requires the Secretary of Defense to notify Congress when military officers are removed from selection board reports and lists for reasons other than misconduct.

    View the bill text of the SASC-passed FY26 NDAA.

    View the executive summary of the FY26 NDAA.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Judiciary Witnesses Call for Congressional Action on Organized Retail Crime, Endorse Grassley-Led Bill

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Iowa Chuck Grassley

    WASHINGTON – In response to questioning from Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) at a hearing today, witnesses urged congressional action to address the nationwide scourge of organized retail crime and endorsed the Grassley-led, bipartisan Combating Organized Retail Crime Act

    The witnesses discussed the dangers of organized retail crime, including its ties to international criminal and terrorist syndicates. Grassley’s Combating Organized Retail Crime Act was cited as a “game changer,” given the legislation’s proposal to zero-in on criminal enterprises through commonsense penalties and multi-agency coordination.

    The witnesses included:

    • The Honorable Summer Stephan, President of the National District Attorneys Association and District Attorney for San Diego County;
    • The Honorable David J. Glawe, President and CEO of the National Insurance Crime Bureau;
    • Scott McBride, Chief Global Asset Protection Officer for American Eagle Outfitters Inc.; and
    • Donna Lemm, Chief Strategy Officer for IMC Logistics, testifying on behalf of the American Trucking Associations.

    Grassley’s opening statement is available HERE.

    Video and excerpts of Grassley’s exchanges with the witnesses follow.

    [embedded content]

    VIDEO

    On the Combating Organized Retail Crime Act:

    Grassley: “Ms. Stephan, you’re a strong supporter of my bill, [the Combating Organized Retail Crime Act] … How would this legislation improve the ability of both law enforcement and prosecutors like you to tackle organized retail crime?”

    Stephan: “I believe that the [Combating Organized Retail Crime Act] would be a game-changer. [Despite] the 218 organized crime cases that our office has [prosecuted] in San Diego, we have not been able to break through to what is going on nationally. We know these groups are operating nationally and internationally … but the investigations stop at the local level. 

    “[Organized retail crime] is a national problem that’s draining economic resources from hardworking Americans. But, it’s also draining the heart and soul, and security of human beings. We have to be able to bring national solutions.”

    On Transnational Criminal Organizations and Organized Retail Crime:

    Grassley: “We know from Department of Homeland Security reports that cartels, terrorists and human traffickers either facilitate organized retail and supply chain crime or use its proceeds to finance other crimes. How are transnational criminal organizations using organized retail and supply chain crime to further their criminal activities?”

    Glawe: “We have seen goods moving overseas. In Mexico, we [found] over 2,000 vehicles that ended up south of the border. We know that these stolen goods are going to West Africa and the Middle East … We know that the supply chains are interdicted with Lebanese Hezbollah. We’ve seen that with Hamas, and we know the Mexican drug cartels are involved with the goods going south of the border. 

    “A coordination center … to coordinate intelligence … and coordinate operations is critical. This committee is well aware of … the Counter Terrorism Center and Counter Proliferation Center. These centers provide a hub for informational and operational sharing and sharing and coordinating resources, as well as tactical level response. We know the successful model, and this bill would get us there.”

    On Combating Organized Retail Crime through Aggregation:

    Grassley: “Ms. Stephan, title 18 makes it a federal crime to transport stolen property with a value of $5,000 or more in interstate or foreign commerce. Supreme Court case law allows prosecutors to aggregate the value of stolen goods in a common scheme to reach that threshold. Why is aggregation of theft amounts important?”

    Stephan: “Aggregation is critical because it distinguishes between somebody who is drug addicted who goes in to steal something like food … [and] separates them from the habitual organized criminals. It allows [prosecutors] to see the activity in totality and to be able to see the repeat offenses that form the structure of organized, habitual criminals. In California, we recently … made a change in Proposition 36 that allowed us to aggregate, and it’s already making a difference. [California] used to have criminals come in with a calculator to [steal] right under $950, thus leaving them at a citation misdemeanor level. That’s what caused all our products to become locked up, except the criminals that were committing the crimes.”

    -30-

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Senate Builds on Record-Setting Confirmation Pace with First Judicial Confirmation

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Iowa Chuck Grassley

    WASHINGTON – Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) welcomed the Senate’s confirmation of Whitney D. Hermandorfer to be a United States Circuit Judge for the Sixth Circuit. Hermandorfer was confirmed by a vote of 46-42 and is the first judicial nominee to be confirmed during the 119th Congress.   

    “Whitney Hermandorfer’s confirmation is a boon to the federal judiciary. As the Director of the Strategic Litigation Unit in Tennessee, she’s led major cases on civil rights and the separation of powers and is widely praised for her legal mind, impeccable qualifications, collegial nature and constitutionalist philosophy. I was proud to lead Ms. Hermandorfer’s nomination through the Senate Judiciary Committee and am confident she will be an excellent federal judge,” Grassley said. “Despite Democrat obstruction, Senate Republicans will push forward to confirm President Trump’s nominees. More than 80 percent of judicial nominees in the Judiciary Committee last Congress received bipartisan support. I hope Democrats can learn to let down their opposition to law and order nominees and begin good faith participation in the Senate’s advice and consent role this Congress.”

    Watch Grassley discuss Hermandorfer’s nomination on the Senate floor HERE.

    Background:

    In the first six months of the 119th Congress, Senate Republicans:

    • Confirmed 21 members of President Trump’s Cabinet, putting his team in place faster than the last three incoming administrations;
    • Confirmed 89 of President Trump’s civilian nominees, outpacing the first Trump administration; and
    • Confirmed 12 ambassador nominees, which is more than the incoming Biden, first Trump and George W. Bush administrations.

    The 119th Congress began with 10 straight weeks of voting in the Senate – the longest continuous stretch in more than 15 years. In total, the Senate has been in session and voting for 24 of the last 27 weeks and has held more roll call votes this year than every Congress at this point in the last 35-plus years.

    -30-

    MIL OSI USA News