Source: Asia Development Bank
Improving statistical capacity in various areas of climate change relies on collaboration among governments, international development and research organizations, academia, and the private sector to foster innovation and the exchange of knowledge.
By pooling resources and expertise, new capacity building initiatives can drive the development of best practices in the compilation of climate change data and statistics, ensuring national statistics offices have the latest and most powerful statistical tools and methodologies at their disposal. Through these collaborative efforts, national statistics offices will be better positioned to contribute effectively to global climate action, bolstering efforts to mitigate and adapt to the impacts of a changing climate.
ADB’s survey on the compilation of climate change statistics in Asia and the Pacific suggests that such collaboration is already underway among national statistics offices in member economies. Eighteen national statistics offices reported collaborating with other government agencies, sectors, or international organizations to address data gaps in statistics related to climate change. Other actions commonly taken by national statistics offices included use of administrative and big data and improvements to data infrastructure.
Figure 4. Measures Taken by National Statistics Offices to Address Data Gaps on Climate Change
Support provided by more advanced national statistics offices to their peers with fewer resources can also help build capacity and promote the exchange of best practices, ultimately contributing to the development of robust climate change statistics programs across Asia and the Pacific.
The survey showed that six of the 29 national statistics offices respondents in Asia and the Pacific indicated that they had provided support related to climate change statistics to other economies, either directly (three of six) or through associated organizations (four of six). Feedback from the six economies that provided support states that the most common types of assistance were for capacity building and project proposals. Other types of support included short-term assistance, provision of experts, and support on acquisition of technological and/or digital infrastructure and equipment.