Source: Asia Development Bank
The first element of the methodology is the identification and mitigation of corruption risks. Organizations are required to carry out annual internal analyses using defined risk indicators. Once the assessment is complete, each risk is evaluated along two axes: risk likelihood (from very rare to very often) and risk impact (from minor to severe), scored on a scale from 1 to 5. These dimensions form the basis of the visual risk map illustrated below.
Figure 1. Example of Corruption Risk Map
This process results in two separate risk maps. The first map focuses on risks associated with legislative frameworks, such as inconsistencies, ambiguous formulations, or gaps that can be exploited. The second map highlights risks embedded in organizational processes and managerial operations (e.g., recruitment, budgeting, and procurement). Including the risk maps supports a more structured and data-driven approach to corruption prevention. It allows institutions to clearly visualize, assess, and prioritize corruption risks, helping them target vulnerabilities more effectively and implement appropriate mitigation strategies.