NewzIntel.com

    • Checkout Page
    • Contact Us
    • Default Redirect Page
    • Frontpage
    • Home-2
    • Home-3
    • Lost Password
    • Member Login
    • Member LogOut
    • Member TOS Page
    • My Account
    • NewzIntel Alert Control-Panel
    • NewzIntel Latest Reports
    • Post Views Counter
    • Privacy Policy
    • Public Individual Page
    • Register
    • Subscription Plan
    • Thank You Page

Category: Africa

  • MIL-OSI: Falcon Oil & Gas Ltd. – Filing of Interim Financial Statements

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    FALCON OIL & GAS LTD.

    (“Falcon”)

    Filing of Interim Financial Statements

    20 May 2025 – Falcon Oil & Gas Ltd. (TSXV: FO, AIM: FOG) announces that it has filed its interim financial statements for the three months ended 31 March 2025 and the accompanying Management’s Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”).

    The following should be read in conjunction with the complete unaudited unreviewed interim financial statements and the accompanying MD&A for the three months ended 31 March 2025, which are available on the Canadian System for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval (“SEDAR+”) at www.sedarplus.ca and on Falcon’s website at www.falconoilandgas.com.

    Q1 2025 Financial Highlights

    • Debt free with cash of $6.9 million at 31 March 2025 (31 December 2024: $6.8 million).
    • Continued focus on strict cost management and efficient operation of the portfolio.

    Ends.

    For further information, please contact:

    CONTACT DETAILS:

    Falcon Oil & Gas Ltd.          +353 1 676 8702
    Philip O’Quigley, CEO +353 87 814 7042
    Anne Flynn, CFO +353 1 676 9162
     
    Cavendish Capital Markets Limited (NOMAD & Broker)
    Neil McDonald / Adam Rae +44 131 220 9771
       

    Falcon Oil & Gas Ltd.
    Interim Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Loss
    (Unaudited)

          Three months ended
    31 March 2025
    $’000
    Three months ended
    31 March 2024
    $’000
       
                 
    Revenue            
    Oil and natural gas revenue     – –    
          – –    
                 
    Expenses            
    Exploration and evaluation expenses     (40) (44)    
    General and administrative expenses     (491) (528)    
    Foreign exchange gain     77 120    
          (454) (452)    
                 
    Results from operating activities     (454) (452)    
                 
    Finance income     98 8    
    Finance expense     (141) (362)    
    Net finance expense     (43) (354)    
                 
    Loss and comprehensive loss for the period     (497) (806)    
                 
    Loss and comprehensive loss attributable to:            
                 
    Equity holders of the company     (497) (804)    
    Non-controlling interests     – (2)    
                 
    Loss and comprehensive loss for the period     (497) (806)    
                 
             
    Loss per share attributable to equity holders of the company:        
                 
    Basic and diluted     ($0.000) ($0.001)    

    Falcon Oil & Gas Ltd.
    Interim Condensed Consolidated Statement of Financial Position
    (Unaudited)

        At 31 March
    2025
    $’000
    At 31 December
    2024
    $’000
           
    Assets      
    Non-current assets      
    Exploration and evaluation assets   53,347 50,291
    Accounts receivable   56 56
    Restricted cash   2,123 2,040
        55,526 52,387
           
    Current assets      
    Cash and cash equivalents   6,896 6,823
    Accounts receivable   139 3,031
        7,035 9,854
           
    Total assets   62,561 62,241
           
    Equity and liabilities      
           
    Equity attributable to owners of the parent      
    Share capital   406,684 406,684
    Contributed surplus   47,446 47,446
    Deficit   (410,652) (410,155)
        43,478 43,975
    Non-controlling interests   690 690
    Total equity   44,168 44,665
           
    Liabilities       
    Non-current liabilities      
    Decommissioning provision   16,751 16,587
        16,751 16,587
           
    Current liabilities      
    Accounts payable and accrued expenses   1,642 989
        1,642 989
           
    Total liabilities   18,393 17,576
           
    Total equity and liabilities   62,561 62,241

    Falcon Oil & Gas Ltd.
    Interim Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
    (Unaudited)

        Three months ended 31 March
        2025
    $’000
    2024
    $’000
           
    Cash flows from operating activities      
    Net loss for the period   (497) (806)
    Adjustments for:      
    Share based compensation   – 36
    Depreciation   – 1
    Net finance expense   43 354
    Effect of exchange rates on operating activities   (77) (120)
    Change in non-cash working capital:      
    Increase in accounts receivable   (110) (83)
    Increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses   19 7
    Net cash used in operating activities   (622) (611)
           
    Cash flows from investing activities      
    Interest received   8 8
    Exploration and evaluation assets   (2,384) (2,869)
    Legacy exploration permit bonds refund   19 –
    R&D Tax incentive refund   2,962 –
    Net cash generated by / (used in) investing activities   605 (2,861)
           
    Change in cash and cash equivalents   (17) (3,472)
    Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents   90 (231)
           
    Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period   6,823 7,992
           
    Cash and cash equivalents at end of period   6,896 4,289

    All dollar amounts in this document are in United States dollars “$”, except as otherwise indicated.

    About Falcon Oil & Gas Ltd.

    Falcon Oil & Gas Ltd is an international oil & gas company engaged in the exploration and development of unconventional oil and gas assets, with the current portfolio focused in Australia, South Africa and Hungary. Falcon Oil & Gas Ltd is incorporated in British Columbia, Canada and headquartered in Dublin, Ireland.

    For further information on Falcon Oil & Gas Ltd. please visit www.falconoilandgas.com

    Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

    Certain information in this press release may constitute forward-looking information. This information is based on current expectations that are subject to significant risks and uncertainties that are difficult to predict. Actual results might differ materially from results suggested in any forward-looking statements. Falcon assumes no obligation to update the forward-looking statements, or to update the reasons why actual results could differ from those reflected in the forward looking-statements unless and until required by securities laws applicable to Falcon. Additional information identifying risks and uncertainties is contained in Falcon’s filings with the Canadian securities regulators, which filings are available at www.sedarplus.ca.

    Attachment

    • 033125.3 FINAL Press release – Announcing release of 31 March 2025 results

    The MIL Network –

    May 20, 2025
  • MIL-Evening Report: There’s no country more important to Australia than Indonesia. Trouble is, the feeling isn’t mutual

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Tim Lindsey, Malcolm Smith Professor of Asian Law and Director of the Centre for Indonesian Law, Islam and Society, The University of Melbourne

    Making Jakarta their first overseas visit has become a set piece for newly elected Australian prime ministers dating back to John Howard in 1996.

    So, we should not be surprised that Prime Minister Anthony Albanese flew to Jakarta soon after his landslide re-election, just as he did in 2022. In fact, it would be very surprising if he did not.

    These visits are now an obligation for a newly elected PM. Failing to jump on the plane would be seen in Indonesia as an intentional snub.

    The visits follow a familiar pattern. The prime minister offers some sort of paraphrase of Paul Keating’s famous tag, “There is no country more important to Australia than Indonesia”. (Albanese actually quoted Keating word for word.)

    There is a carefully planned photo op, such as riding bamboo bikes, visiting a crowded marketplace or, this time around, a golf cart ride at the presidential palace.

    The brief visit ends with a joint press conference, where both leaders pledge to “strengthen the relationship”. With occasional exceptions, their announcements are vague and aspirational. Sometimes they just restate what they’ve said before.

    In other words, these performative post-election prime ministerial visits have become an essential, symbolic part of Australia’s bilateral relationship with Indonesia, but they too often lack substance.

    This is a pity, because Australia needs to work much harder to achieve its key aims with Indonesia, which Albanese defined in Jakarta as closer economic and defence engagement.

    To put it bluntly, Australia struggles to get Indonesia’s attention. It is an uncomfortable truth that, from an Indonesian perspective, Australia’s leverage and importance is limited. Jakarta sees Canberra as the junior partner in the relationship.

    An Indonesian president is hardly likely to say, “There is no country more important to Indonesia than Australia”, let alone make a post-election visit to Canberra a fixture.

    Prabowo’s gesture to Australia

    This is not to say Indonesia’s current president, Prabowo Subianto, is hostile to Australia. He is not.

    In fact, he made a significant friendly gesture to Australia soon after he was sworn in last year by releasing the remaining five members of the Bali Nine from prison in Indonesia and sending them home for Christmas.

    This move was beneficial to Prabowo on multiple fronts.

    First, generous acts of clemency of this kind distinguish him from his predecessor, Joko “Jokowi” Widodo, and his hardline “war on drugs” policy. Jokowi endorsed Prabowo in last year’s election, but Prabowo is keen to emerge from his long shadow.

    Second, Prabowo is far more cosmopolitan and interested in international affairs than his predecessor. He has ambitions to be a player on the global stage, as witnessed by his (failed) efforts to broker a peace between Russia and Ukraine last year. Freeing foreign prisoners makes him more welcome overseas.

    Third, granting clemency helps counter Prabowo’s dark past, and the long-standing and credible allegations of human rights abuses that date back to his time as Soeharto’s son-in-law and a special forces commander.

    These allegations are more of a problem internationally than at home, but they are still a nuisance for Prabowo. He likely expected his Bali Five gesture would win him a warm and image-enhancing response from Albanese – and indeed, that proved to be the case.

    But while all this suited Prabowo nicely, it did not result in any major developments in the two areas most important to Australia: trade and security.

    Lingering mistrust on security matters

    There are understandable reasons for this.

    Take security, for example. Indonesia is critically important to Australia as its northern defensive shield. It is vital to our interests that we have a strong security partnership with Indonesia. But Australia is less important to Indonesia’s own defences.

    We are also not fully trusted. In addition to lingering concerns about the AUKUS deal with the US and UK, Australia’s role in the independence of Timor–Leste in 1999 resulted in Indonesia famously tearing up the sweeping security treaty Keating negotiated with Soeharto in 1995.

    Indeed, the loss of Timor–Leste still rankles with some senior Indonesian military figures. Australia and Indonesia have signed new security arrangements since then – the Lombok Treaty, in particular, and the agreement signed last year enabling more complex training exercises between the two militaries. However, none match the scale of the 1995 agreement.

    Moreover, our engagement on security is complicated by Indonesia’s long-standing commitment to a non-aligned diplomatic policy – what it calls “free and active”.

    Jakarta did stop short of allowing Russia to base long-range aircraft in Papua province, but under its non-aligned stance, it has purchased weapons and fuel from Russia and become the first Southeast Asian country join the BRICS grouping of countries (founded by Brazil, Russia, India and China).

    Undercooked on trade and investment

    As for the economic relationship, our low profile in Indonesian markets – despite our proximity – severely limits our leverage and influence in Indonesia.

    Indonesia has a population approaching 300 million and a huge retail market. But as a trading partner, Australia ranks far behind many other countries, including China, the US, Japan, India, Singapore, and even Malaysia, the Philippines and Vietnam.

    This is despite signing a free trade agreement with Indonesia in 2019. Although it was many years in the making, the deal did not deliver dramatic changes at the time, and has had limited impact ever since.

    Indonesia is open about its hunger for more foreign investment. But, again, we are not a major investor in our near neighbour. In fact, Australia invests more in far-flung tax havens such as Luxembourg and Ireland, as well as in Papua New Guinea, Taiwan and India, than we do in Indonesia. It’s not even in our top 20 investment destinations.

    As Albanese said in Jakarta, strengthening investment ties requires government, business and civil society demonstrating greater engagement and ambition when it comes to Indonesia.

    This is not easy. Australian businesses remain wary of Indonesia because of bureaucratic red tape and the complexity created by decentralised and sometimes chaotic local governments, as well as serious, widespread corruption.

    However, this is true of many other business destinations in Asia and the developing world. It is hard to avoid the impression that Australian businesses have a blind spot regarding Indonesia.

    A move that would get Jakarta’s attention

    The ambition that Albanese called for is well overdue.

    Both China and India have large diasporas in Australia that can offer rich human resources for investors in those countries and help them navigate complex markets. By comparison, the local Indonesian population is tiny, and our education system has failed to fill the gap.

    In fact, Indonesian studies is barely hanging on by its fingernails in our schools and universities. The numbers of students studying Indonesian in Year 12 has plunged to minuscule numbers in recent years. And universities drop courses every year, with enrolments falling 63% between 1992 and 2019.

    A second-term leader with a gigantic majority, Albanese is ideally positioned to do something about this.

    He should take a page from the playbooks of ALP heroes Keating and Kevin Rudd, who funded programs to boost Asian languages in schools. Albanese should allocate serious funding – A$100 million would be good start – over the next decade to revive Indonesian language instruction in Australian schools.

    That would help rebuild what was once a level of Indonesia literacy unmatched anywhere else in the world. It would be a big step towards helping Australian businesses summon up the courage to enter complex Indonesian markets where only around 5% of the population have functional English.

    And it would be an ambitious announcement that would be guaranteed to get serious attention in Jakarta.

    Tim Lindsey receives funding from the Australian Research Council.

    – ref. There’s no country more important to Australia than Indonesia. Trouble is, the feeling isn’t mutual – https://theconversation.com/theres-no-country-more-important-to-australia-than-indonesia-trouble-is-the-feeling-isnt-mutual-256900

    MIL OSI Analysis – EveningReport.nz –

    May 20, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Africa: President Ramaphosa’s US visit to bolster strategic, mutually beneficial SA-US ties

    Source: South Africa News Agency

    By Dikeledi Molobela

    Washington, D.C., United States – President Cyril Ramaphosa’s visit to Washington, D.C. is a significant and positive step in strengthening the strategic and mutually beneficial relationship between South Africa and the United States.

    Speaking to SAnews ahead of the President’s arrival in the US capital, the Head of Public Diplomacy at the Department of International Relations and Cooperation (DIRCO), Clayson Monyela, underscored the importance of the visit.

    Monyela expressed optimism that the upcoming meeting on Wednesday will provide an opportunity to address and clarify issues, thereby enhancing the relationship between the two nations. 

    “We want to appreciate the fact that there is an opportunity for the two leaders to engage. The fact that President Ramaphosa is here in Washington, D.C. accompanied by four Ministers to meet with President Trump and his delegation is a positive step for this important and strategic relationship between the two countries.

    “This is a mutually beneficial relationship, and we believe that this platform avails an opportunity to explain, clarify and contextualise some of the issues that have been in the public domain. 

    “We look forward to the meeting on Wednesday because this will help in enhancing this important relationship between us and the United States,” Monyela said on Monday. 

    Describing the US as South Africa’s second-largest trading partner, Monyela emphasised that the two countries have been strategic partners for many years.

    “This is an important meeting between two countries that have been strategic partners for many years in a mutually beneficial relationship.

    “The US is our second biggest trading partner. We run the most diverse, powerful, number one economy on the African continent, currently holding the Presidency of the G20, so this is an important platform for the two countries to come together and talk about matters that will enhance the existing strong and cordial ties between the two countries to the benefit of the people of the two nations. 

    “Of course, there are issues that need to be explained and clarified but at the end, we are quite confident that this platform will help us get closer and keep moving forward as strategic partners, and enhance the mutually beneficial relationship,” he said. 

    Monyela highlighted the reciprocal nature of economic relations between the two nations, noting that South Africa is not only a trading partner but also an investor in the US economy. 

    “We also invest in the US economy. South African companies such as Nando’s are operating there. If you go to Louisiana, you will find many US nationals employed by South African companies,” he said.

    “We come to this meeting not as a country that offers nothing to the table. This is why it is important to enhance the existing relations between the two countries because they are indeed mutually beneficial,” Monyela said. 

    President Ramaphosa will meet with his US counterpart President Donald Trump at the White House on Wednesday. – SAnews.gov.za

    MIL OSI Africa –

    May 20, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Security: DHS Hits Back at Tim Walz’s Dangerous Rhetoric Comparing ICE to Gestapo

    Source: US Department of Homeland Security

    While politicians like Gov. Walz fight to protect criminal illegal aliens, ICE officers will continue risking their lives to arrest murderers, kidnappers, and pedophiles  

    WASHINGTON – Following Governor Tim Walz’s sickening rhetoric calling Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents “Trump’s modern-day Gestapo,” the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is setting the facts straight on the bravery of our ICE enforcement agents. Every day they risk their lives to arrest vicious criminal illegal aliens let into our country by the previous administration.  

    “Governor Walz’s comments comparing ICE agents to the Gestapo is sickening. This type of rhetoric and demonization of ICE officers has led to our officers facing a 413% increase in assaults,” said Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin. “While politicians like Walz fight to protect criminal illegal aliens, our ICE officers will continue putting their lives and safety on the line to arrest murderers, kidnappers, and pedophiles that were let into our country by the previous administration’s open border policies.” 

    Below are just a few examples of violent criminal aliens ICE has arrested in Tim Walz’s Minnesota: 

    On May 1, 2025, ICE arrested Abdirashid Elmi, a 50-year-old illegal alien from Somalia. His criminal history includes convictions for murder, driving while intoxicated, and disorderly conduct. 

    On April 24th, ICE announced the arrest of Erick Martinez Mondragon, a 25-year-old illegal alien from Mexico and a member of the 18th Street gang. He served time for robbery and possession of a firearm. 

    On April 25, ICE announced the arrest of Marco Quizhpi Granda, an illegal criminal alien from Ecuador. He was previously convicted for criminal sexual conduct with a child. 

    On January 26, 2025, ICE arrested Octavio Juarez-Bonilla, an illegal alien from Mexico. He previously possessed child pornography on a work computer. 

    On February 19, 2025, ICE arrested Thailand Oh, a 25-year-old illegal alien from Laos. Oh’s criminal history includes convictions for domestic assault and weapons charges. Oh has had a final order of removal since April 5, 2024. 

    On May 9, 2025, ICE arrested Jorge Padilla Mendez, an illegal alien from Ecuador. He was previously arrested for robbery. Padilla was ordered removed by an immigration judge on August 28, 2024. 

     
    On May 9th, ICE announced the arrest of Abymahel Torres-Arriaga, a 36-year-old illegal alien from Mexico. He has a conviction for selling heroin/meth/fentanyl from the Goodhue County District Court in Red Wing, MN.  

    On May 8th ICE announced the arrest of Edgar David Felipe-Mendez, an illegal alien from Guatemala. He has a previous conviction of conspiracy to sell heroin/meth/fentanyl from the Goodhue County District Court in Red Wing, MN,  

    On April 30, 2025, ICE arrested Blong Yang, His past criminal convictions include carrying a concealed weapon and fourth degree sexual assault. Yang has had a final order of removal since April 19, 2023.  

    MIL Security OSI –

    May 20, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: CLARKE ISSUES STATEMENT ON SUPREME COURT RULING STRIPPING 350,000 VENEZUELANS OF TEMPORARY PROTECTED STATUS

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Congresswoman Yvette D Clarke (9th District of New York)

    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:

    May 19, 2025

    MEDIA CONTACT: 

    e: jessica.myers@mail.house.gov

    c: 202.913.0126

    WASHINGTON, DC – Congresswoman Yvette D. Clarke (NY-09) released the following statement:

    “With a single shameful Supreme Court ruling, more than 350,000 Venezuelans who were promised and granted refuge from the brutal dictatorship they fled will find themselves in the grips of that regime again. Make no mistake: this is a humanitarian betrayal of unprecedented proportions. 

    “Weaponizing the suffering of the most vulnerable people on the planet just to appear tough on immigration to his base is a new level of despicable behavior from this president. To add insult to injury, while Trump shuffles Black and Brown people back to their countries, kidnaps legal residents, and condemns others to the most notorious prisons in the world, he chooses to offer asylum to South African Apartheid sympathizers. 

    “Trump’s cruel and xenophobic agenda has been built on misinformation, scapegoating, and labeling all those looking for a better life as criminals. Today, the judicial branch has given him a pass to continue politicizing the struggles of migrants and furthering his unconstitutional immigration policies, and that is truly disgraceful.”

    ###

    MIL OSI USA News –

    May 20, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Reconciliation Recommendations of the House Committee on the Judiciary

    Source: US Congressional Budget Office

    Legislation Summary

    H. Con. Res. 14, the Concurrent Resolution on the Budget for Fiscal Year 2025, instructed the House Committee on the Judiciary to recommend legislative changes that would increase deficits up to a specified amount over the 2025-2034 period. As part of the reconciliation process, the House Committee on the Judiciary approved legislation on April 30, 2025, with provisions that would increase deficits.

    Estimated Federal Cost

    The reconciliation recommendations of the House Committee on the Judiciary would increase deficits by $6.9 billion over the 2025-2034 period. The estimated budgetary effects of the legislation are shown in Table 1. The costs of the legislation fall within budget functions 150 (international affairs), 600 (income security), and 750 (administration of justice).

    Return to Reference

    Table 1.

    Estimated Budgetary Effects of Reconciliation Recommendations Title VII, House Committee on the Judiciary, as Ordered Reported on April 30, 2025

     

    By Fiscal Year, Millions of Dollars

       
     

    2025

    2026

    2027

    2028

    2029

    2030

    2031

    2032

    2033

    2034

    2025-2029

    2025-2034

     

    Increases or Decreases (-) in Direct Spending

       

    Budget Authority

    81,395

    -354

    -667

    -605

    -703

    -789

    -871

    -912

    -990

    -1,113

    79,066

    74,391

    Estimated Outlays

    *

    6,467

    10,273

    15,082

    18,799

    13,657

    8,207

    2,625

    -530

    -1,122

    50,621

    73,458

     

    Increases in Revenues

       

    Estimated Revenues

    0

    4,533

    5,916

    6,193

    6,990

    8,004

    8,397

    8,635

    8,872

    9,008

    23,632

    66,548

     

    Net Increase or Decrease (-) in the Deficit

    From Changes in Direct Spending and Revenues

       

    Effect on the Deficit

    *

    1,934

    4,357

    8,889

    11,809

    5,653

    -190

    -6,010

    -9,402

    -10,130

    26,989

    6,910

    Basis of Estimate

    For this estimate, CBO assumes that the legislation will be enacted in summer 2025. CBO’s estimates are relative to its January 2025 baseline and cover the period from 2025 through 2034. Outlays of directly appropriated amounts were estimated using historical obligation and spending rates for similar programs. The estimates account for judicial decisions and administrative actions through April 10, 2025.

    Subtitle A. Immigration Matters

    Subtitle A would impose new or modify existing fees on aliens (non-U.S. nationals) seeking benefits under the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). Under the legislation, a portion of those fees would remain available to certain agencies to spend without further appropriation; the remaining amounts would be deposited in the Treasury. Subtitle A also would directly appropriate $81.4 billion in total to the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Department of Homeland Security (DHS), and Department of Justice (DOJ) for increased immigration enforcement and other activities. CBO estimates that enacting subtitle A would increase direct spending outlays by $73.5 billion and increase revenues by $66.5 billion over the 2025-2034 period (see Table 2).

    Part 1. Immigration Fees

    The legislation would impose fees on aliens for undertaking various activities, including applying for or renewing certain travel or work authorization documents, and applying for other benefits under the INA. Under current law, the Department of State adjudicates requests for visas from aliens abroad; U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) adjudicates requests for benefits under the INA for aliens who are physically present in the United States. Fees also can be assessed by Customs and Border Protection (CBP), for inspections of people at ports of entry, and by the Executive Office of Immigration Review (EOIR), which oversees removal proceedings and adjudicates requests from aliens in immigration court. Under current law, those agencies can charge fees to cover the costs of providing services. Any new fees collected under the legislation would be additional to collections under current law.

    A portion of some fees under the legislation would be made available to the Department of State, CBP, EOIR, HHS, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), and USCIS; those amounts could be spent without further appropriation. Beginning in 2027, CBO estimates that some of that spending would be subject to sequestration.

    The legislation specifies fee amounts for 2025. In subsequent years, some amounts would increase based on the consumer price index for all urban consumers. The legislation would prohibit any fees from being waived or reduced.

    Indirect taxes and regulatory fees tend to reduce collections of income and payroll taxes. As a result, CBO expects that most of the new fee collections would be partially offset by decreases in tax receipts of about 25 percent of the gross fee collections each year. Unless otherwise noted in the estimates below, that offset is applied to the estimated revenues for each fee.

    CBO’s estimates of the number of people who would pay the fees are based on a January 2025 demographic and economic forecast. Where applicable, those projections were adjusted to account for executive actions and judicial decisions undertaken as of April 10, 2025. Those include ending the use of various categorical parole programs; terminating parole for people who arrived under the Parole Process for Cubans, Haitians, Nicaraguans, and Venezuelans; and terminating the 2023 designation of Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Venezuelan nationals physically present before October 3, 2023. CBO’s estimates also are based on historical trends in filing volume and recent trends in inflows of other foreign nationals since January 2025. Where applicable, CBO’s estimates also account for applicants’ and petitioners’ responses to the fees that would be imposed under the legislation.

    Asylum Fee. Section 70002 would impose a $1,000 fee on aliens applying for asylum. CBO estimates that about 4 million people will apply for asylum over the 2025-2034 period, increasing revenues by $2.3 billion under this section for the same period. Some of those fees would be made available to EOIR and USCIS to retain and spend without further appropriation. CBO estimates that the provision would increase outlays by $1.5 billion over the 2025-2034 period. On net, CBO estimates that enacting this section would decrease the deficit by $784 million over the 2025-2034 period. (Under current law, aliens in removal proceedings can file defensive asylum applications with EOIR; others can file affirmative asylum applications with USCIS. Under this provision, 50 percent of the fees collected from defensive asylum applications would be made available to EOIR and 50 percent of the fees collected from affirmative asylum applications would be made available to USCIS.)

    Employment Authorization Document Fees. Section 70003 would impose a $550 fee on certain aliens applying for initial work authorization. The fee would apply to asylum applicants, parolees, and people granted TPS. Of the fees collected from asylum applicants, 25 percent would be made available to USCIS to retain and spend without further appropriation.

    CBO estimates that about 3 million asylum applicants, 225,000 parolees, and fewer than 1,000 TPS beneficiaries will apply for initial work authorization over the 2025-2034 period, increasing revenues under this provision by $1.4 billion over the same period. CBO also estimates that the provision would increase outlays by $413 million over the 2025‑2034 period. On net, CBO estimates that enacting the provision would decrease Erich Dvorak (for nonimmigration matters)

    Estimate Reviewed By

    Elizabeth Cove Delisle
    Chief, Income Security Cost Estimates Unit

    Ann E. Futrell
    Acting Chief, Natural and Physical Resources Cost Estimates Unit

    Justin Humphrey
    Chief, Finance, Housing, and Education Cost Estimates Unit

    Joshua Shakin
    Chief, Revenue Projections Unit

    Kathleen FitzGerald 
    Chief, Public and Private Mandates Unit

    Christina Hawley Anthony
    Deputy Director of Budget Analysis

    H. Samuel Papenfuss 
    Deputy Director of Budget Analysis

    Chad Chirico 
    Director of Budget Analysis

    Phillip L. Swagel

    Director, Congressional Budget Office

    [Table 2 begins on the next page.]

    Authorization Document Fees

                       

    Budget Authority

    0

    77

    63

    54

    47

    42

    39

    38

    37

    35

    241

    432

    Estimated Outlays

    0

    50

    62

    57

    50

    44

    40

    38

    36

    36

    219

    413

    Sec. 70007, Unaccompanied 
    Alien Child Sponsor Fee

                       

    Budget Authority

    0

    23

    24

    18

    17

    18

    18

    18

    19

    19

    82

    174

    Estimated Outlays

    0

    12

    21

    20

    18

    18

    18

    18

    19

    19

    71

    163

    Sec. 70009, Form I-94 Fee

                       

    Budget Authority

    0

    -702

    -1,012

    -1,063

    -1,131

    -1,204

    -1,283

    -1,355

    -1,442

    -1,544

    -3,908

    -10,736

    Estimated Outlays

    0

    -746

    -1,016

    -1,066

    -1,135

    -1,208

    -1,287

    -1,369

    -1,457

    -1,550

    -3,963

    -10,834

    Sec. 70015, Diversity Immigrant 
    Visa Fees

                       

    Budget Authority

    0

    143

    137

    149

    152

    155

    158

    166

    170

    169

    581

    1,399

    Estimated Outlays

    0

    71

    108

    143

    150

    153

    156

    159

    163

    166

    472

    1,269

    Sec. 70016, EOIR Fees

                       

    Budget Authority

    0

    28

    37

    40

    40

    41

    43

    45

    46

    46

    145

    366

    Estimated Outlays

    0

    18

    30

    37

    40

    41

    43

    43

    44

    45

    125

    341

    Sec. 70017, ESTA Fee

                       

    Budget Authority

    0

    -80

    -10

    116

    123

    129

    136

    146

    155

    159

    149

    874

    Estimated Outlays

    0

    -26

    -38

    15

    80

    123

    130

    136

    144

    152

    31

    716

    Sec. 70018, Immigration User Fees

                       

    Budget Authority

    0

    -96

    -152

    -132

    -134

    -137

    -140

    -128

    -131

    -148

    -514

    -1,198

    Estimated Outlays

    0

    -194

    -174

    -140

    -137

    -139

    -142

    -145

    -148

    -151

    -645

    -1,370

    Sec. 70019, EVUS Fee

                       

    Budget Authority

    0

    11

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    20

    56

    150

    Estimated Outlays

    0

    2

    10

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    18

    19

    41

    129

                         

    (Continued)

    Table 2.

    Estimated Changes in Direct Spending and Revenues Under Reconciliation Recommendations Title VII, House Committee on the Judiciary, as Ordered Reported on April 30, 2025

    (Continued)

     

    By Fiscal Year, Millions of Dollars

       
     

    2025

    2026

    2027

    2028

    2029

    2030

    2031

    2032

    2033

    2034

    2025-2029

    2025-2034

     

    Increases or Decreases (-) in Direct Spending

       

    Part 2. Use of Funds

                           

    Sec. 70100, Executive Office for Immigration Review

                         

    Budget Authority

    1,250

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    1,250

    1,250

    Estimated Outlays

    *

    47

    153

    322

    553

    144

    31

    0

    0

    0

    1,075

    1,250

    Sec. 70101, Adult Alien Detention Capacity and Family Residential Centers

                       

    Budget Authority

    45,000

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    45,000

    45,000

    Estimated Outlays

    *

    4,000

    6,900

    9,550

    11,500

    7,050

    4,200

    1,800

    0

    0

    31,950

    45,000

    Sec. 70102, Retention and Signing Bonuses 
    for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Personnel

                       

    Budget Authority

    858

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    858

    858

    Estimated Outlays

    *

    77

    86

    101

    126

    206

    238

    24

    0

    0

    390

    858

    Sec. 70103, Hiring of Additional 
    U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement 
    Personnel

                     

    Budget Authority

    8,000

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    8,000

    8,000

    Estimated Outlays

    *

    320

    700

    1,100

    1,500

    2,220

    1,720

    360

    80

    0

    3,620

    8,000

    Sec. 70104, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Hiring Capability

                       

    Budget Authority

    600

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    600

    600

    Estimated Outlays

    *

    390

    120

    90

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    600

    600

    Sec. 70105, Transportation and 
    Removal Operations

                     

    Budget Authority

    14,400

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    14,400

    14,400

    Estimated Outlays

    *

    625

    1,561

    2,538

    3,575

    3,068

    1,853

    935

    245

    0

    8,299

    14,400

    Sec. 70106, Information 
    Technology Investments

                     

    Budget Authority

    700

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    700

    700

    Estimated Outlays

    *

    7

    40

    84

    160

    196

    115

    70

    28

    0

    291

    700

    Sec. 70107, Facilities Upgrades

                       

    Budget Authority

    550

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    550

    550

    Estimated Outlays

    *

    6

    30

    66

    128

    154

    92

    52

    22

    0

    230

    550

    Sec. 70108, Fleet Modernization

                       

    Budget Authority

    250

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    250

    250

    Estimated Outlays

    *

    20

    44

    70

    69

    35

    12

    0

    0

    0

    203

    250

    Sec. 70109, Promoting Family Unity

                       

    Budget Authority

    20

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    20

    20

    Estimated Outlays

    *

    16

    3

    1

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    20

    20

                         

    (Continued)

    Table 2.

    Estimated Changes in Direct Spending and Revenues Under Reconciliation Recommendations Title VII, House Committee on the Judiciary, as Ordered Reported on April 30, 2025

    (Continued)

     

    By Fiscal Year, Millions of Dollars

       
     

    2025

    2026

    2027

    2028

    2029

    2030

    2031

    2032

    2033

    2034

    2025-2029

    2025-2034

     

    Increases or Decreases (-) in Direct Spending

       

    Sec. 70110, Funding Section 287(G) of the Immigration and Nationality Act

                       

    Budget Authority

    650

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    650

    650

    Estimated Outlays

    *

    50

    105

    165

    190

    100

    40

    0

    0

    0

    510

    650

    Sec. 70111, Compensation for Incarceration of Criminal Aliens

                         

    Budget Authority

    950

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    950

    950

    Estimated Outlays

    *

    9

    142

    285

    256

    190

    29

    19

    10

    10

    692

    950

    Sec. 70112, Office of the 
    Principal Legal Advisor

                     

    Budget Authority

    1,320

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    1,320

    1,320

    Estimated Outlays

    *

    56

    115

    183

    245

    369

    281

    59

    12

    0

    599

    1,320

    Sec. 70113, Return of Aliens Arriving From Contiguous Territory

                       

    Budget Authority

    500

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    500

    500

    Estimated Outlays

    *

    275

    150

    75

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    500

    500

    Sec. 70114, State and Local Participation in Homeland Security Efforts

                       

    Budget Authority

    787

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    787

    787

    Estimated Outlays

    *

    394

    236

    157

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    787

    787

    Sec. 70115, Unaccompanied Alien 
    Children Capacity

                     

    Budget Authority

    3,000

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    3,000

    3,000

    Estimated Outlays

    *

    90

    180

    450

    600

    600

    450

    270

    120

    0

    1,320

    2,760

    Sec. 70116, Department of Homeland Security Criminal and Gang Checks for Unaccompanied Alien Children

                       

    Budget Authority

    20

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    20

    20

    Estimated Outlays

    *

    16

    3

    1

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    20

    20

    Sec. 70117, Department of Health and Human Services Criminal and Gang Checks for Unaccompanied Alien Children

                       

    Budget Authority

    20

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    20

    20

    Estimated Outlays

    *

    4

    6

    6

    4

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    20

    20

    Sec. 70118, Information about Sponsors and Adult Residents of Sponsor Households

                     

    Budget Authority

    50

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    50

    50

    Estimated Outlays

    *

    10

    15

    15

    10

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    50

    50

                         

    (Continued)

    Table 2.

    Estimated Changes in Direct Spending and Revenues Under Reconciliation Recommendations Title VII, House Committee on the Judiciary, as Ordered Reported on April 30, 2025

    (Continued)

     

    By Fiscal Year, Millions of Dollars

       
     

    2025

    2026

    2027

    2028

    2029

    2030

    2031

    2032

    2033

    2034

    2025-2029

    2025-2034

     

    Increases or Decreases (-) in Direct Spending

       

    Sec. 70119, Repatriation of 
    Unaccompanied Alien Children

                       

    Budget Authority

    100

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    100

    100

    Estimated Outlays

    *

    80

    15

    5

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    100

    100

    Sec. 70120, United States 
    Secret Service

                       

    Budget Authority

    1,170

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    1,170

    1,170

    Estimated Outlays

    *

    61

    188

    333

    469

    94

    25

    0

    0

    0

    1,051

    1,170

    Sec. 70121, Combating Drug 
    Trafficking and Illegal Drug Use

                       

    Budget Authority

    500

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    500

    500

    Estimated Outlays

    *

    350

    100

    50

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    500

    500

    Sec. 70122, Investigating and Prosecuting Immigration Related Matters

                       

    Budget Authority

    600

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    600

    600

    Estimated Outlays

    *

    128

    150

    150

    150

    22

    0

    0

    0

    0

    578

    600

    Sec. 70123, Expedited Removal for 
    Criminal Aliens

                     

    Budget Authority

    75

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    75

    75

    Estimated Outlays

    *

    60

    11

    4

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    75

    75

    Sec. 70124, Removal of Certain Criminal 
    Aliens Without Further Hearing

                       

    Budget Authority

    25

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    25

    25

    Estimated Outlays

    *

    20

    4

    1

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    25

    25

    Subtitle C. Other Matters

                           

    Sec. 70300, Limitation on Donations Made Pursuant to Settlement Agreements to Which the United States Is a Party

                       

    Budget Authority

    a

    a

    a

    a

    a

    a

    a

    a

    a

    a

    a

    a

    Estimated Outlays

    a

    a

    a

    a

    a

    a

    a

    a

    a

    a

    a

    a

    Total Changes

                           

    Budget Authority

    81,395

    -354

    -667

    -605

    -703

    -789

    -871

    -912

    -990

    -1,113

    79,066

    74,391

    Estimated Outlays

    *

    6,467

    10,273

    15,082

    18,799

    13,657

    8,207

    2,625

    -530

    -1,122

    50,621

    73,458

                         

    (Continued)

    Table 2.

    Estimated Changes in Direct Spending and Revenues Under Reconciliation Recommendations Title VII, House Committee on the Judiciary, as Ordered Reported on April 30, 2025

    (Continued)

     

    By Fiscal Year, Millions of Dollars

       
     

    2025

    2026

    2027

    2028

    2029

    2030

    2031

    2032

    2033

    2034

    2025-2029

    2025-2034

     

    Increases and Decreases (-) in Revenues

       

    Subtitle A. Immigration Matters

                         

    Part 1. Immigration Fees

                           

    Sec. 70002, Asylum Fee

                       

    Estimated Revenues

    0

    356

    361

    287

    244

    219

    206

    198

    195

    194

    1,248

    2,260

    Sec. 70003, Employment Authorization Document Fees

                         

    Estimated Revenues

    0

    234

    205

    167

    148

    134

    125

    120

    118

    116

    754

    1,367

    Sec. 70004, Parole Fee

                       

    Estimated Revenues

    0

    4

    5

    5

    5

    6

    6

    6

    6

    6

    19

    49

    Sec. 70005, Special Immigrant 
    Juvenile Fee

                       

    Estimated Revenues

    0

    2

    2

    2

    2

    2

    2

    2

    2

    2

    8

    18

    Sec. 70006, Temporary Protected 
    Status Fee

                       

    Estimated Revenues

    0

    126

    212

    154

    155

    209

    142

    162

    205

    139

    647

    1,504

    Sec. 70007, Unaccompanied 
    Alien Child Sponsor Fee

                       

    Estimated Revenues

    0

    68

    69

    53

    51

    52

    53

    54

    56

    57

    241

    513

    Sec. 70008, Visa Integrity Fee

                       

    Estimated Revenues

    0

    2,154

    2,992

    3,115

    3,080

    3,216

    3,355

    3,499

    3,646

    3,798

    11,341

    28,855

    Sec. 70010, Yearly Asylum Fee

                       

    Estimated Revenues

    0

    0

    0

    0

    61

    118

    231

    231

    233

    237

    61

    1,111

    Sec. 70011, Fee for Continuances Granted in Immigration Court Proceedings

                       

    Estimated Revenues

    0

    30

    41

    42

    43

    44

    45

    46

    47

    48

    156

    386

    Sec. 70012, Fee Relating to Renewal and Extension of Employment Authorization for Parolees

                       

    Estimated Revenues

    0

    *

    *

    *

    *

    *

    *

    *

    *

    *

    *

    *

    Sec. 70013, Fee Relating to Termination, Renewal, and Extension of Employment Authorization for Asylum Applicants

                     

    Estimated Revenues

    0

    313

    489

    622

    1,462

    1,984

    2,155

    2,200

    2,205

    2,211

    2,886

    13,641

    Sec. 70014, Fee Relating to Renewal and Extension of Employment Authorization for Aliens Granted Temporary Protected Status

                     

    Estimated Revenues

    0

    229

    364

    549

    546

    543

    538

    534

    531

    526

    1,688

    4,360

                         

    (Continued)

    Table 2.

    Estimated Changes in Direct Spending and Revenues Under Reconciliation Recommendations Title VII, House Committee on the Judiciary, as Ordered Reported on April 30, 2025

    (Continued)

     

    By Fiscal Year, Millions of Dollars

       
     

    2025

    2026

    2027

    2028

    2029

    2030

    2031

    2032

    2033

    2034

    2025-2029

    2025-2034

     

    Increases and Decreases (-) in Revenues

       

    Sec. 70015, Diversity Immigrant 
    Visa Fees

                       

    Estimated Revenues

    0

    703

    717

    734

    750

    766

    783

    800

    817

    835

    2,904

    6,905

    Sec. 70016, EOIR Fees

                       

    Estimated Revenues

    0

    76

    104

    107

    109

    112

    114

    116

    118

    121

    396

    977

    Sec. 70017, ESTA Fee

                       

    Estimated Revenues

    0

    0

    208

    288

    299

    571

    592

    603

    626

    648

    795

    3,835

    Sec. 70019, EVUS Fee

                       

    Estimated Revenues

    0

    13

    18

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    68

    178

    Sec. 70020, Fee for Sponsor of Unaccompanied Alien Child who Fails to Appear in Immigration Court

                       

    Estimated Revenues

    0

    210

    110

    30

    -5

    -15

    5

    15

    15

    15

    345

    380

    Sec. 70021, Fee for Aliens Ordered 
    Removed in Absentia

                       

    Estimated Revenues

    0

    10

    13

    13

    14

    14

    14

    15

    15

    15

    50

    123

    Sec. 70022, Customs and Border Protection Inadmissible Alien Apprehension Fee

                       

    Estimated Revenues

    0

    5

    6

    7

    7

    9

    10

    12

    14

    16

    25

    86

    Subtitle C. Other Matters

                           

    Sec. 70300, Limitation on Donations Made Pursuant to Settlement Agreements to Which the United States Is a Party

                       

    Estimated Revenues

    a

    a

    a

    a

    a

    a

    a

    a

    a

    a

    a

    a

    Total Changes

                           

    Estimated Revenues

    0

    4,533

    5,916

    6,193

    6,990

    8,004

    8,397

    8,635

    8,872

    9,008

    23,632

    66,548

     

    Net Increase or Decrease (-) in the Deficit

    From Changes in Direct Spending and Revenues

       

    Effect on the Deficit

    0

    1,934

    4,357

    8,889

    11,809

    5,653

    -190

    -6,010

    -9,402

    -10,130

    26,989

    6,910

    a. CBO has no basis on which to estimate the direction or magnitude of the changes in direct spending and revenues or the effect on the deficit that would stem from the enactment of section 70300.

    MIL OSI USA News –

    May 20, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Africa: President Ramaphosa arrives in Washington to reset SA-US relations

    Source: South Africa News Agency

    By Dikeledi Molobela

    Washington DC, United States – President Cyril Ramaphosa has arrived in Washington DC for a high-level Working Visit aimed at resetting and revitalising bilateral relations between South Africa and the United States.

    Touching down in the US capital this afternoon, the President was in high spirits as he greeted members of the media with a warm smile and a wave before proceeding into his hotel.

    The visit is set against the backdrop of a rapidly changing global landscape and comes at a time when both countries are exploring opportunities to redefine their engagement. 
     

    WATCH | President Ramaphosa arrives in Washington DC

    On Wednesday, President Ramaphosa is expected to meet with US President Donald Trump at the White House, in what is seen as a pivotal moment for strengthening cooperation in trade, investment, and global diplomacy.

    Speaking to media upon arrival, Presidential Spokesperson Vincent Magwenya emphasised the importance of the visit, describing it as a significant step in reframing bilateral, economic and trade relations.

    “The President is prepared for the moment. He’s looking forward to it. He’s highly enthused, and we’re looking forward to a very successful meeting aimed at resetting the relationship between South Africa and the United States,” Magwenya said.

    He added that the primary goal is to engage openly and constructively on a range of issues, with a strong focus on trade relations.

    “The whole world knows there is no persecution of any particular race in South Africa. So, we don’t need to spend any effort dispelling something that is well known is not there. 

    “We’re going to be focusing on opportunities that will underpin this resetting of the relationship, and we’re looking forward to ironing out whatever issues of concern that there may be,” he said. 

    The future of the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA), a US trade preference programme, is expected to feature prominently in the discussions.

    “We would still like to see AGOA extended and see South Africa’s continued participation in AGOA. However, if the Trump administration has decided to do away with the trade scheme, we will then be ready to table an outline of what will be a new trade relationship framework,” said Magwenya.

    AGOA is a US trade preference programme that benefits eligible sub-Saharan African countries, providing duty-free access to the US market for many products, including vehicles, citrus, wine, and some apparel. 

    In April, President Trump announced global reciprocal tariffs on most imported goods, with South Africa facing a 31% tariff increase, effectively nullifying the preference that sub-Saharan African countries enjoy under AGOA. 

    Commenting on broader multilateral dynamics, including South Africa’s G20 Presidency, Magwenya addressed questions about the perceived lack of high-level US participation in recent ministerial meetings.

    “[On] that so-called instruction [by the National Security Council], we have not received any formal communication. As far as that is concerned, we’ve seen media reports citing unnamed sources, so we can’t respond to that.

    “Up until now, the US has been fully engaged in the Troika, participating in all G20-related activities. The invitation to President Trump remains open to join other Heads of State at the G20 Summit in November. It’s still a long time between now and then, and a lot can still happen,” Magwenya said. 

    When asked whether President Ramaphosa was apprehensive, particularly in light of past contentious interactions between President Trump and other world leaders, Magwenya was unequivocal.

    “No, he’s not apprehensive at all. We don’t think President Trump invited [the] President for that kind of treatment. There are issues of concern on the side of the US and on our side as well. It is possible that those issues may trigger a rather robust discussion, that’s all in the nature of these engagements.

    “President Ramaphosa… has his own style of engaging. He’s got his own style of communicating, and so we cannot attribute that event to what may or may not happen,” he said. 

    The Spokesperson also responded to questions on the so-called “persecution” of white South African farmers and the refugee narrative. 

    “Clearly, it’s an issue that needs to be addressed, and it will be addressed. But the President is not planning to spend an inordinate amount of time on that issue. The focus is on resetting this relationship and refocusing towards a revised and more enhanced and mutually beneficial trade relationship,” he said.

    On whether President Ramaphosa will meet South African-born entrepreneur Elon Musk during his time in the US, Magwenya said: “Well, we’ve just arrived. We’re going to be briefed by our team that advanced here, and so we will take direction from them in terms of what has been done, what has been prepared, and the allocations.” 

    President Ramaphosa is accompanied by a high-level delegation of Ministers, including Minister of International Relations and Cooperation, Ronald Lamola; Minister in The Presidency Khumbudzo Ntshavheni; Minister of Trade, Industry and Competition, Parks Tau; Minister of Agriculture, John Steenhuisen, and the Special Envoy to the United States of America, Mcebisi Jonas. – SAnews.gov.za

    MIL OSI Africa –

    May 20, 2025
  • MIL-OSI United Nations: 19 May 2025 News release Member States approve WHO Pandemic Agreement in World Health Assembly Committee, paving way for its formal adoption

    Source: World Health Organisation

    World Health Organization Member States, meeting today in Committee A of the World Health Assembly, approved a resolution that calls for the adoption of an historic global compact to make the world safer from future pandemics. The WHO Pandemic Agreement will next be considered for final adoption by the Assembly on Tuesday during the plenary session.

    Monday’s approval of the Pandemic Agreement resolution follows a more than three-year process, launched by governments during the COVID-19 pandemic, to negotiate the world’s first such accord to address the gaps and inequities in preventing, preparing for and responding to pandemics. This watershed agreement was adopted under Article 19 of the WHO Constitution. It aims to foster stronger collaboration and cooperation among countries, international organizations like WHO, civil society, the private sector and other stakeholders to prevent pandemics occurring in the first place, and to better respond in the event of a future pandemic crisis.

    “Governments from all over the world are making their countries, and our interconnected global community, more equitable, healthier and safer from the threats posed by pathogens and viruses of pandemic potential,” said Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, Director-General of the World Health Organization. “I congratulate WHO‘s Member States for resolving to come together in the aftermath of COVID-19 to better protect the world from future pandemics. Their work to develop this global accord will ensure countries work better, faster and more equitably together to prevent and respond to the next pandemic threat.”

    The Pandemic Agreement and the resolution calling for its adoption will be taken up by the full plenary of the World Health Assembly on Tuesday, 20 May. Immediately after, there will be a High-Level segment featuring statements from Heads of States of multiple countries.

    “The WHO Pandemic Agreement is a demonstration of the shared desire by all people to be better prepared to prevent and respond to the next pandemic, with a commitment to the principles of respect for human dignity, equity, solidarity and sovereignty, and basing public health decisions to control pandemics on the best available science and evidence,” said the Honorable Dr Esperance Luvindao, Minister of Health and Social Services of Namibia, and Chair of the Committee A meeting that adopted today’s resolution. “The costs that COVID inflicted on lives, livelihoods and economies were great and many, and we – as sovereign states – have resolved to join hands, as one world together, so we can protect our children, elders, frontline health workers and all others from the next pandemic. It is our duty and responsibility to humanity.”

    The resolution sets out several steps for taking the world forward and preparing for the Pandemic Agreement’s implementation. It includes the launch of a process to draft and negotiate an annex to the Agreement that would establish a Pathogen Access and Benefit Sharing system (PABS) through an Intergovernmental Working Group (IGWG). The result of this process will be considered at next year’s World Health Assembly. Once the Assembly adopts the PABS annex, the Pandemic Agreement will then be open for signature and consideration of ratification, including by national legislative bodies. After 60 ratifications, the Agreement will enter into force.

    In addition, Member States also directed the IGWG to initiate steps to enable setting up of the Coordinating Financial Mechanism for pandemic prevention, preparedness and response, and the Global Supply Chain and Logistics Network (GSCL) to “enhance, facilitate, and work to remove barriers and ensure equitable, timely, rapid, safe, and affordable access to pandemic-related health products for countries in need during public health emergencies of international concern, including pandemic emergencies, and for prevention of such emergencies.”

    According to the Agreement, pharmaceutical manufacturers participating in the PABS system will play a key role in equitable and timely access to pandemic-related health products by making available to WHO “rapid access targeting 20% of their real time production of safe, quality and effective vaccines, therapeutics, and diagnostics for the pathogen causing the pandemic emergency.”  The distribution of these products to countries will be carried out on the basis of public health risk and need, with particular attention to the needs of developing countries and those supported through the GSCL.

    The Pandemic Agreement aligns with the International Health Regulations, amendments to which were adopted by governments at last year’s World Health Assembly to bolster international rules to better detect, prevent and respond to outbreaks.

    Dr Tedros thanked the Bureau of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Body (INB) that coordinated and facilitated the process to draft and negotiate the Pandemic Agreement. The WHO Director-General also praised the tireless work and excellence of the WHO Secretariat team that supported the Bureau and Member States, led by Dr Michael Ryan and Dr Jaouad Mahjour.

    “An immensely talented, experienced and driven WHO team was assembled to support the vision of governments to develop this historic Pandemic Agreement,” Dr Tedros said. “This group of individuals, representing so many countries and regions of the world, deserve enormous credit and thanks from the international community for what they have done to help make the world safer for future generations.”

    The INB was established in December 2021, at a special session of the World Health Assembly. WHO Member States were tasked to develop a convention, agreement or other international instrument under the WHO Constitution to strengthen pandemic preparedness, prevention and response. Members of the INB Bureau that guided the process were Co-Chairs Ms Precious Matsoso (South Africa) and Ambassador Anne-Claire Amprou (France), and Vice-Chairs Ambassador Tovar da Silva Nunes (Brazil), Ambassador Amr Ramadan (Egypt), Dr Viroj Tangcharoensathien (Thailand); and Ms Fleur Davies (Australia). Past members included former Co-Chair, Mr Roland Driece (the Netherlands), and former Vice-Chairs Ambassador Honsei Kozo (Japan), Mr Kazuho Taguchi (Japan), and Mr Ahmed Soliman (Egypt).

    MIL OSI United Nations News –

    May 20, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Video: President Cyril Ramaphosa has arrived in Washington DC for his working visit.

    Source: Republic of South Africa (video statements-2)

    President Cyril Ramaphosa has this afternoon, Monday 19 May 2025 arrived in Washington DC for his working visit.

    The purpose of the visit is to reset and revitalise bilateral relations between South Africa and the United States (US). In this regard, the visit will focus specifically on reframing bilateral, economic and commercial relations.

    On Wednesday, 21 May 2025, President Ramaphosa will meet with President Donald Trump at the White House.

    President Ramaphosa will be accompanied by the following Ministers: Mr Lamola, Minister of International Relations and Cooperation, Ms Ntshavheni, Minister in the Presidency, Mr Tau, Minister of Trade, Industry Competition, Mr Steenhuisen, Minister of Agriculture and Mr Jonas, Special Envoy to the United States of America.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PImRrGyQb8M

    MIL OSI Video –

    May 20, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Economics: China Round Table on WTO Accessions, focusing on Arab economies, concludes in Muscat

    Source: WTO

    Headline: China Round Table on WTO Accessions, focusing on Arab economies, concludes in Muscat

    Entitled “Advancing Arab Economies: From Strategic Accessions to Global Trade Integration”, the 13th China Round Table highlighted the benefits of WTO membership for economic policy coherence, growth and development. With the aim of informing the strategies of other acceding economies, the event explored how accession has enabled Arab economies to reform their trade regimes and engage more effectively with the multilateral trading system. The challenges that members faced immediately following their accession were also examined.
    A high-level session celebrated the 25th anniversary of Oman’s WTO accession and recognized the challenges that Oman faced on its path to accession, as well as the contributions that Oman has made to the multilateral trading system.
    Opening the Round Table, Oman’s Undersecretary for Commerce and Industry, Dr Saleh bin Said Masan, said: “Since joining the WTO in November 2000, Oman has been an active and committed member of the multilateral trading system. It has always regarded membership of the WTO as a strategic step towards enhancing its role in the global economy and deepening its co-operation with countries around the world.”
    Highlighting the importance of the China Round Table in fostering cooperation among nations, Dr Saleh added: “It seems timely to consider efforts to restore the central role of the WTO as a platform for resolving global trade issues. The WTO should serve the interests of all countries, regardless of their level of economic development, in line with the principles enshrined in its founding agreement.
    In addition to acceding economies, participants at the Round Table included the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) member states – namely, the Kingdom of Bahrain, the State of Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates – and representatives of the International Trade Centre (ITC), United Nations Trade and Development (UNCTAD) and the World Bank Group. Comoros, which became a WTO member in August 2024, also participated in the Round Table.
    China’s Vice Minister of Commerce, Mr Yan Dong, said: “The 13th China Round Table is a unique opportunity to discuss how to help developing countries speed up accessions and benefit from the multilateral trading system. … As the global landscape undergoes rapid changes unseen in a century, accelerating accessions of developing countries, especially LDCs, to the WTO, and better integrating them into the multilateral trading system is conducive not only to their economic resilience and recovery, but also to the vitality and representation of the WTO.”
    WTO Deputy Director-General Xiangchen Zhang said: “Oman’s journey since 2000 shows how the multilateral trading system can underpin bold diversification and outward-looking reform.”  
    Underscoring the relevance of the 13th China Round Table, DDG Zhang noted: “These round tables have supported many acceding countries in their journeys, and we expect that they will continue to make further progress for the rest of the year. Eight members of the Arab League remain outside the WTO and seven of them have been negotiating, on average, for twenty years. … These numbers speak of untapped potential – potential that accession can unlock by anchoring domestic reforms, attracting investment and fostering regional integration. … Pragmatic solutions, creative flexibilities and targeted technical assistance can minimize years of negotiations and deliver concrete development dividends.”
    The Round Table addressed the state of play of current accession negotiations in the context of preparations for the 14th WTO Ministerial Conference (MC14), to be held in March 2026, with Ethiopia and Uzbekistan stating that they intend to complete their accession processes by MC14. The discussion also highlighted the need to better leverage technical assistance and capacity-building activities to support both accession efforts and new members’ participation in the WTO.
    Participants also explored the role of the private sector in facilitating WTO accession and promoting regional integration. A dedicated session on Oman’s economic diplomacy provided insights into how trade can contribute to economic resilience, long-term peace and sustainable prosperity.
    Acceding governments and interested WTO members meet annually at the China Round Table to discuss the integration of new economies into the rules-based multilateral trading system. Of the 22 members of the League of Arab States, 14 are WTO members, seven are currently undertaking the accession process, and one has held observer status in WTO ministerial conferences since 2005.
    More information on the 13th China Round Table is available here.
    The China Round Tables are among the activities of the China Programme, which supports and finances activities under six pillars:
    An accessions internship programme at the WTO
    Annual China Round Tables on WTO accessions
    Increasing participation of LDCs in WTO meetings
    South-South dialogue on LDCs and development
    Follow-up workshops to LDCs’ Trade Policy Reviews
    An LDC Experience Sharing Programme.
    More information on WTO accessions can be found here.

    Share

    MIL OSI Economics –

    May 20, 2025
  • MIL-OSI United Nations: 19 May 2025 News release Papua New Guinea eliminates trachoma as a public health problem

    Source: World Health Organisation

    In a landmark public health achievement, Papua New Guinea (PNG) has been validated by the World Health Organization (WHO) for eliminating trachoma as a public health problem. Trachoma, a neglected tropical disease (NTD) and the world’s leading infectious cause of blindness, no longer poses a public health threat in the country.

    “I congratulate the government and people of Papua New Guinea on this incredible achievement, said Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus,” WHO Director-General. “This success demonstrates what can be achieved when science and sustained partnerships come together to serve the health and dignity of communities.”

    Official recognition was made during the 78th World Health Assembly held in Geneva, Switzerland, following a comprehensive review of PNG’s elimination dossier.

    Trachoma is caused by the bacterium Chlamydia trachomatis and spreads through personal contact, flies that have been in contact with eye or nose discharge and contact with infected surfaces. Repeated infections can lead to scarring, in-turning of the eyelids, and ultimately irreversible blindness. Globally, the disease remains endemic in many vulnerable communities where access to clean water and sanitation is limited.

    Papua New Guinea’s success story

    “Papua New Guinea’s achievement is an example of medical science in action,” said Dr Saia Ma’u Piukala, WHO Regional Director for the Western Pacific. “It reflects a deep understanding of local epidemiology and a commitment to using the right interventions for the right reasons. We commend the National Department of Health, health workers, researchers, and partners for their persistent efforts.”

    In PNG, population-based surveys conducted in 2015 found signs of active trachoma in children but very low levels of Chlamydia trachomatis, as well as negligible levels of trachomatous trichiasis – the advanced stage of the disease that causes blindness. A follow-up ancillary survey in 2020 further confirmed that affected children were not progressing to more severe disease. This epidemiological pattern, shared with other Melanesian countries, provided the foundation for PNG’s successful claim to have eliminated trachoma as a public health problem.

    Unlike many other countries where trachoma elimination has required surgery campaigns, antibiotic mass drug administration and targeted improvements in access to water, sanitation and hygiene, PNG’s success was driven by robust disease surveillance. The country’s National Department of Health, with the support from partners, oversaw a series of rapid assessments, prevalence surveys, and community-level investigations. These efforts confirmed that community-wide interventions for trachoma were not warranted.

    PNG’s trachoma elimination programme received technical and financial support from WHO, the Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, the Fred Hollows Foundation, the Brien Holden Vision Institute, Sightsavers, PNG Eye Care, and several other organizations. The programme also benefited from scientific collaborations with the Papua New Guinea Institute of Medical Research, the Global Trachoma Mapping Project, Collaborative Vision, Tropical Data and the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, among many others.

    Since 2016, 13 countries in the Western Pacific Region have been validated by WHO for eliminating at least one NTD. Trachoma elimination is part of broader progress on NTDs in PNG and the Western Pacific Region.

    Trachoma is the first neglected tropical disease eliminated in PNG. Following this successful validation, globally, 56 countries have eliminated at least one NTD, including 22 others that have eliminated trachoma as a public health problem. PNG joining these groups enhances our collective momentum toward the targets of the NTD road map 2021–2030.

    WHO continues to support countries in their efforts to eliminate trachoma and other NTDs, ensuring healthier lives for all, particularly the most disadvantaged.

    MIL OSI United Nations News –

    May 20, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Reconciliation Recommendations of the House Committee on Natural Resources

    Source: US Congressional Budget Office

    Legislation Summary

    H. Con. Res. 14, the Concurrent Resolution on the Budget for Fiscal Year 2025, instructed the House Committee on Natural Resources to recommend legislative changes that would decrease deficits by not less than a specified amount over the 2025-2034 period. As part of the reconciliation process, the House Committee on Natural Resources approved legislation on May 6, 2025, with provisions that would decrease deficits.

    Estimated Federal Cost

    In CBO’s estimation, the reconciliation recommendations of the House Committee on Natural Resources would, on net, decrease deficits by $20.2 billionover the 2025-2034 period. The estimated budgetary effects of the legislation are shown in Table 1. The costs of the legislation fall within budget functions 300 (natural resources and environment) and 950 (undistributed offsetting receipts).

    Return to Reference

    Table 1.

    Estimated Budgetary Effects of Reconciliation Recommendations Title VIII, House Committee on Natural Resources, as Ordered Reported on May 6, 2025

     

    By Fiscal Year, Millions of Dollars

       
     

    2025

    2026

    2027

    2028

    2029

    2030

    2031

    2032

    2033

    2034

    2025-2029

    2025-2034

     

    Increases or Decreases (-) in Direct Spending

       

    Budget Authority

    2,018

    -575

    -835

    -1,722

    -1,748

    -2,437

    -2,698

    -3,146

    -3,835

    -4,355

    -2,862

    -19,333

    Estimated Outlays

    -122

    -521

    -659

    -1,523

    -1,504

    -2,224

    -2,254

    -2,693

    -3,377

    -4,096

    -4,329

    -18,973

     

    Increases in Revenues

       

    Estimated Revenues

    0

    65

    130

    130

    135

    140

    140

    145

    150

    150

    460

    1,185

     

    Net Decrease in the Deficit

    From Changes in Direct Spending and Revenues

       

    Effect on the Deficit

    -122

    -586

    -789

    -1,653

    -1,639

    -2,364

    -2,394

    -2,838

    -3,527

    -4,246

    -4,789

    -20,158

    Basis of Estimate

    For this estimate, CBO assumes that the legislation will be enacted in summer 2025. CBO’s estimates are relative to its January 2025 baseline and cover the period from 2025 through 2034. Outlays of directly appropriated amounts were estimated using historical obligation and spending rates for similar programs.

    CBO expects that the share of bonus bids, rents, and royalties from onshore oil, gas, coal, and renewable-energy production paid to states and counties would be subject to sequestration under the Budget Control Act of 2011. CBO estimates that a portion of those payments would be sequestered in each year, starting in 2027 and ending in 2032. However, in every subsequent year, starting in 2028 and ending in 2033, those amounts would be restored, resulting in a net zero budgetary effect over the 2025‑2034 period. CBO includes those effects in its estimates for sections 80101, 80111, 80121, 80122, 80141, 80144, 80181, 80301, 80303, 80304, and 80305.

    Direct Spending

    CBO estimates that enacting the legislation would decrease direct spending outlays by $19.0 billion over the 2025-2034 period (see Table 2).

    Subtitle A. Energy and Mineral Resources

    Subtitle A would require new lease sales on federal land for onshore and offshore oil and gas, coal, and renewable energy and would change permitting processes. CBO estimates that enacting the subtitle would decrease direct spending by $19.7 billion over the 2025-2034 period.

    Federally owned energy resources are developed under a leasing system that requires companies to bid on tracts of land. Winning bidders remit payments called bonus bids when leases are issued; pay annual rent on nonproducing leases; and pay royalties on the value of any oil, gas, coal, or electricity produced from the leased land. Those payments are recorded in the budget as offsetting receipts—that is, as reductions in direct spending. Unless otherwise noted, those fees are deposited in the Treasury.

    Part I. Oil and Gas

    Sections 80101 through 80105 would increase the minimum number of oil and gas lease sales required each year, reinstate noncompetitive oil and gas lease sales, establish permitting by rule for oil and gas drilling, expand the practice of commingling oil and gas production, and reduce royalty rates for new onshore oil and gas leases from 16.67 percent to 12.5 percent. Those sections interact and CBO has shown the estimates of their combined budgetary effects under section 80101.

    Onshore Oil and Gas Leasing Sales. Section 80101 would require the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) to conduct at least four onshore oil and gas lease sales each year in specified states where land is available for oil and gas development under the Mineral Leasing Act. Under current law, the Department of the Interior (DOI) has discretion to postpone or cancel oil and gas lease sales; the section would require BLM to conduct a replacement sale if a sale is canceled. CBO estimates that the resulting number of onshore oil and gas leases would increase by 1,300 annually, on average, over the 2025-2034 period.

    CBO estimates that the interactive effects of enacting this section and sections 80102 through 80105, discussed below, would increase offsetting receipts from bonus bids, rents, and royalties by $12.8 billion, on net, over the 2026-2034 period, after adjusting for the effects of sequestration.

    Noncompetitive Leasing. Section 80102 would reinstate BLM’s authority, rescinded by the 2022 reconciliation act, to award federal land for oil and gas development in noncompetitive leases if no successful bids are made in a competitive sale. Using data from the agency, CBO estimates that enacting the section would increase onshore oil and gas leasing by 150 to 180 leases each year, thus increasing oil and gas production and related collections of royalties over the 2025‑2034 period. This provision interacts with other sections and CBO has shown the estimated budgetary effects under section 80101.

    Permit Fees. Section 80103 would direct DOI to approve applications that allow operators to commingle onshore oil and gas production from multiple sources within a single well. Operators would be required to pay a $10,000 fee and install volume-measuring equipment to ensure appropriate oil and gas allocation and royalty payments. BLM currently allows onshore operators to commingle production under certain conditions; enacting this provision would expand that practice.

    Information from industry sources and BLM indicates that commingling can produce larger yields over shorter periods than is likely with permitting and drilling separate wells. CBO estimates that under this provision DOI would approve an average of 1,000 applications annually over the 2025‑2034 period; thus, royalty collections would increase relative to current law.

    Within two years of enactment, section 80103 also would require DOI to establish a permit-by-rule program. Under the program, leaseholders would purchase permits (at a cost of $5,000) allowing them to notify a permitting authority of their compliance with certain rules. That process would shorten the time to begin oil and gas development.

    Using information from industry sources and BLM, CBO estimates that under this provision, DOI would receive more than 3,000 applications annually over the 2025-2034 period. We expect that oil and gas production would accelerate by about 200 days, on average, increasing royalty payments relative to current law. CBO further expects that under section 80103, future leased parcels would become more valuable, increasing future bonus bids for onshore leases. This provision interacts with other sections and CBO has shown the estimated budgetary effects under section 80101.

    Permitting Fee for Non-Federal Land. Section 80104 would prohibit DOI from requiring permits to drill for oil and gas leases under certain conditions, including drilling in places where the federal government owns less than 50 percent of the minerals or does not own the surface of the drilling area. Operators would be required to pay a $5,000 fee for each lease. Using information from the agency, CBO estimates that fewer than 200 such cases would occur each year over the 2025-2034 period. CBO estimates that oil and gas production would accelerate by about a year in those cases, increasing royalties paid to the federal government. This provision interacts with other sections and CBO has shown the estimated budgetary effects under section 80101.

    Reinstate Reasonable Royalty Rates. Section 80105 would reinstate a royalty rate of 12.5 percent for new onshore oil and gas leases. The 2022 reconciliation act set the royalty rate at 16.67 percent. (The legislation would not affect the royalty rate for outstanding leases.) CBO expects that one effect of lowering the rate would be to reduce royalty receipts from new lease sales that CBO projects would occur under current law. CBO also expects that lowering the rate would increase oil and gas production on those sites, because of the potential for increased profits for operators and leaseholders, thus increasing royalty collections. In addition, CBO expects that future leased parcels would become more valuable, thus raising future bonus bids on onshore leases. This provision interacts with other sections and CBO has shown the estimated budgetary effects under section 80101.

    Under current law, through August 2032 the royalty rates for offshore oil and gas leases must be between 16.67 percent and 18.75 percent, and at least 16.67 percent after that. This provision would permanently set the rate between 12.5 percent and 18.75 percent. Based on royalty rates for recent oil and gas leasing, CBO expects that the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) would continue to impose a rate of 18.75 percent; on that basis, CBO expects that the legislation would not affect the royalty rate for future offshore oil and gas leases.

    Part II. Geothermal

    Sections 80111 and 80112 would require annual geothermal lease sales and exclude power plants outside of the leasing area from paying royalties on geothermal resources used by those plants. The two sections interact and CBO has shown the estimates of their combined budgetary effects under section 80111.

    Geothermal Leasing. Section 80111 would require DOI to hold annual geothermal lease sales and replace canceled or delayed sales within the same year. Sales would include parcels in each state that are eligible for geothermal development under the Federal Land and Management Act of 1976. Under current law, DOI holds geothermal lease sales every other year. Winning bidders remit bonus bids as leases are issued and they pay annual rent on nonproducing leases and royalties on the value of any electricity produced and sold from the leased land. Geothermal projects on federal land take between seven and nine years from leasing to electricity production, depending on permitting, exploration results, and financial resources.

    Using information from the industry and data from BLM, CBO estimates that under the legislation DOI would issue about 450 new leases through 2034. CBO estimates that, after sharing a portion of those receipts with states and counties where the activities occur, the legislation would increase net offsetting receipts by $23 million from bonus bids, rents, and royalties over the 2025-2034 period, after adjusting for sequestration.

    Geothermal Royalties. Section 80112 would exclude from royalty payments federal geothermal resources that support power plants located outside the boundaries of the federal geothermal leasing area. Under current law, using geothermal resources within or outside an area does not exempt lessees from paying royalties. Using data from BLM, CBO estimates that more than half of all power plants that access federal geothermal resources would be excluded from paying royalties under this provision, decreasing royalty payments under new leases.

    Part III. Alaska

    Part III would reinstate the Coastal Plain Oil and Gas Leasing Program and require new lease sales in the National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska.

    Coastal Plain Oil and Gas Leasing. Section 80121 would require BLM to reinstate six leases canceled after the 2021 lease sale. CBO expects that the lessees would repay the $8 million for bonus bids they received in reimbursements after the cancellation and that they would pay rent totaling $3 million a year until production begins.

    This provision also would require BLM to conduct at least four oil and gas lease sales in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge within 10 years of enactment. BLM would be required to offer a minimum of 400,000 acres in each sale, or the total number of unleased acres available at the time of a sale. The legislation would require those sales to be conducted under terms established by the “Record of Decision for the Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Coastal Plain Oil and Gas Leasing Program, Alaska,” dated August 21, 2020.

    Section 80121 also would require BLM to issue any rights-of-way, easements, permits, or other necessary authorizations for the exploration, development, production, and transportation of oil and gas under those leases. Those authorizations would be considered to satisfy all federal laws, including the Alaska National Interest Lands Act, Endangered Species Act, and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), and they would be exempted from judicial review. CBO expects that enacting those provisions would significantly increase the likelihood that companies would participate in each sale and the amount that companies would bid in those sales.

    Using information from BLM, the U.S. Geological Survey, and industry experts, CBO estimates that the reinstated and new leases awarded under the legislation would increase net offsetting receipts to the federal government by $946 million from bonus bids, rents, and royalties over the 2025-2034 period, after adjusting for sequestration. That amount is adjusted for sequestration and incorporates the 50 percent that would be paid to Alaska under current law.

    Estimates of bonus bids, rents, and royalties from leases in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge are uncertain. Potential bidders might make assumptions that are different from CBO’s, including assumptions about long-term oil prices, production costs, the amount of oil and gas resources in the area, production timelines, and alternative investment opportunities. The number of factors that affect companies’ investment and operation decisions result in wide ranges for bonus bids, rents, and royalties. CBO’s estimate represents the midpoint of those ranges.

    National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska. Section 80122 would direct DOI to resume the oil and gas leasing program under the Naval Petroleum Reserves Production Act of 1976, requiring a lease sale within one year of enactment, and every two years thereafter. Under regulations issued in 2020, BLM would offer a minimum of 4 million acres in each sale. The legislation would deem all sales to meet environmental requirements established in NEPA.

    Using information from BLM, the U.S. Geological Survey, and industry groups, CBO estimates that bonus bids, rents, and royalties from the reinstated and new leases would increase net offsetting receipts by $532 million over the 2025‑2034 period, after adjusting for sequestration. That amount is adjusted for sequestration and incorporates the 50 percent that would be paid to Alaska under current law.

    Part IV. Mining

    Part IV would reinstate mining leases in national forest land in the state of Minnesota and require the necessary approvals and permits for a new road in Alaska.

    Superior National Forest Lands in Minnesota. Section 80131 would rescind an order issued by BLM in 2023 that was effective for a period of 20 years and subject to valid existing rights. That order withdrew more than 225,000 acres of National Forest System land in Minnesota from mineral and geothermal leasing. This provision would require the Departments of Agriculture and the Interior to reissue all mineral leases for a 20-year term with an option for renewal. The remaining terms of the reinstated leases would be as they were originally and the leases would be exempt from judicial review.

    Using information from BLM on the leases’ terms, CBO expects that leaseholders would pay combined annual rent and minimum royalties of about $400,000 and would pay a 6 percent royalty on the gross value of minerals mined. Based on information from the industry, CBO expects that state and local permitting and preproduction activities would take about seven years to complete. Because of uncertainty about when and whether leaseholders would obtain the necessary state permits, CBO used a 50 percent probability that production would begin after 2031 but before 2034. On that basis, CBO estimates that the federal government would collect $81 million in rents and royalties over the 2025-2034 period.

    Ambler Road in Alaska. Section 80132 would require federal approval for rights-of-way, permits, licenses, leases, and any other authorizations needed to access public land for the construction of the Ambler Road across the western unit of the Gates of the Arctic National Preserve and the Central Yukon Planning Area in Alaska. All authorizations would be granted under the 2020 Ambler Road Environmental Impact Statement and would be exempt from judicial review. This provision also would establish an annual rent of $500,000 from 2025 through 2034. CBO estimates that enacting the provision would reduce direct spending by $4 million over the 2025-2034 period.

    Part V. Coal

    Part V would require DOI to rescind the temporary pause on coal leasing and reduce the royalty rate on existing and new coal leases. Sections 80141 through 80143 interact and CBO has shown the estimates of their combined budgetary effects under section 80141.

    Coal Leasing. Section 80141 would direct DOI to process and approve qualified applications for coal leases and provide any necessary approvals for mining. The legislation also would require DOI to make available a minimum of 4 million additional acres with known recoverable coal reserves in the lower 48 states and Alaska. That requirement would exclude national parks and monuments as well as historic, wilderness, recreational, and conservation areas. After adjusting for the effects of sequestration, CBO estimates that the bonus bids, rents, and royalties would increase offsetting receipts by $237 million over the 2025‑2034 period.

    Future Coal Leasing. Section 80142 would rescind a 2016 Secretarial Order from DOI that paused the issuance of new federal leases for thermal coal. This provision interacts with section 80141 and CBO has shown the estimated budgetary effects under that section.

    Coal Royalty. Section 80143 would reduce the royalty rate on federal coal leases from 12.5 percent to 7 percent. That rate would apply to existing and new leases from the date of enactment through September 30, 2034. CBO estimates that the reduction would increase direct spending during the same period by reducing offsetting receipts. This section interacts with section 80141 and CBO has shown the estimated budgetary effects under that section.

    Authorization to Mine Federal Minerals. Section 80144 would authorize the mining of all coal reserves under certain federal coal leases previously issued for about 800 acres in Montana. Mining authorizations would be provided in accordance with a 2020 mining plan modification. Using information from BLM, CBO estimates that enacting the provision would increase net royalties by $42 million in the 2025‑2034 period, after sharing 50 percent of the total receipts with the state of Montana. The estimate is adjusted for the effects of sequestration.

    Part VI. NEPA

    Part VI would authorize sponsors of projects that require environmental assessments or environmental impact statements under NEPA to pay a fee to potentially expedite completion of the assessments or statements and for exemption from judicial review.

    Project Sponsor Opt-In Fees for Environmental Reviews. Section 80151 would authorize sponsors of projects that require environmental assessments or environmental impact statements under NEPA to pay a fee for a potentially expedited completion of the assessment or statement and for exemption from judicial review. The fee would be set at 125 percent of the anticipated costs to prepare or supervise the preparation of the assessment or statement.

    CBO expects that the exemption from judicial review would accelerate the start date of some large, federally funded transportation, energy, and infrastructure projects that otherwise would have been delayed by litigation. Based on NEPA litigation data and factoring in the chance that projects would be delayed by other litigation (for example, challenges under the Endangered Species Act), CBO anticipates that enacting section 80151 would accelerate those projects by about two years. We also expect that some federally funded projects that would have been permanently stopped by a challenge under current law would commence under this provision. CBO estimates that accelerating or starting those formerly delayed or stopped projects would increase direct spending by $190 million over the 2025-2034 period. (CBO expects that federal funds for those projects would have been spent more slowly or would not have been spent at all, under current law.)

    Finally, CBO expects that enacting section 80151 would accelerate the start of some energy projects on federal land, increasing the collection of rents and royalties over the 2025-2034 period. Those effects are included as interactive effects in other sections.

    Rescission Relating to Environmental and Climate Data Collection. Section 80152 would rescind the unobligated balances of funds directly appropriated in the 2022 reconciliation act to the Council on Environmental Quality. Using information from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), CBO estimates that enacting this provision would decrease direct spending by $25 million over the 2025-2034 period.

    Part VII. Miscellaneous

    Part VII would require a fee for the filing of protests against oil and gas lease sales. The receipts collected under the provision would reduce direct spending.

    Protest Fees. Section 80161 would establish filing fees to submit protests against oil and gas lease sales; the fees would depend on the number of pages and protests in each filing. Using data from BLM on protests and the estimated increases in oil and gas leasing under the legislation, CBO estimates that enacting the provision would increase offsetting receipts by $5 million over the 2025-2034 period.

    Part VIII. Offshore Oil and Gas Leasing

    Part VIII would require new sales of offshore oil and gas leases, authorize the commingling of offshore oil production from multiple reservoirs within a single well under certain conditions, and increase the amount of energy receipts that may be distributed to states and conservation programs. Sections 80171 and 80172 interact and CBO has shown the combined estimates of their budgetary effects under section 80171.

    Mandatory Offshore Oil and Gas Lease Sales. Section 80171 would require BOEM to hold at least 30 lease sales in the Gulf of America during the 15 years after enactment and 6 lease sales in Alaska’s Cook Inlet during the 10 years after enactment. Those sales would be held annually according to a schedule described in the legislation.

    In September 2023, BOEM released its five-year plan for holding Outer Continental Shelf oil and gas lease sales during the 2024-2029 period. The Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act requires BOEM to issue leasing schedules; any significant revisions require a process for consultation and rulemaking. Under the current five-year plan, the agency intends to hold two more sales in the gulf: one each in 2027 and 2029. The plan does not include sales in the Alaska Outer Continental Shelf. The legislation would authorize BOEM to hold the new sales in addition to those in the five-year plan.

    CBO expects that, under the legislation, BOEM would hold 24 additional offshore oil and gas sales by the end of 2034: 18 in the gulf and 6 in the Cook Inlet. Because planning and executing a lease sale takes between six months and two years, CBO expects that the sale that the legislation would require before August 15, 2025, would occur in a later year. CBO estimates that new offshore lease sales would generate $6.3 billion in bonus bids, rents, and royalties over the 2026-2034 period. That estimate includes the effects of enacting section 80172.

    Offshore Commingling. Section 80172 would require DOI to approve operator requests to commingle offshore oil production from multiple reservoirs within a single well unless there is conclusive evidence that safety is threatened or aggregate production could decline. The Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement currently generally allows offshore leaseholders to commingle production if the pressure differential between reservoirs is under 200 pounds per square inch, though in one region, that differential is set at below 1,500 pounds per square inch. The legislation would authorize commingling at any pressure differential if safety and production are unaffected.

    According to academic research and industry feedback, commingled wells can be more productive, on average, than sequential wells. On that basis, CBO expects that enacting the provision would increase the number of commingled wells, leading to increased production. CBO also expects that future leased tracts would become more valuable, increasing the amount of future bonus bids on offshore leases.

    Using information from BOEM, the Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement, and industry groups, CBO expects that the provision would increase offsetting receipts relative to current law. This section interacts with section 80171 and CBO has shown its effects in the estimate for that section.

    Limitations of Amount of Distributed Qualified Outer Continental Shelf Revenues. Section 80173 would amend the Gulf of Mexico Energy Security Act of 2006 to increase the amount of energy receipts that may be distributed to states and conservation programs. Under current law, not more than $500 million in receipts collected from leases entered into on or after December 2006 may be distributed in each year through 2055; the legislation would allow up to $650 million to be distributed in each year through 2034. CBO expects that the new funding resulting from increasing the cap would be subject to sequestration beginning in 2027, which would reduce spending by about $50 million over the 2027-2032 period. Accounting for sequestration, CBO estimates that increasing the cap to $650 million would increase direct spending outlays by $1.2 billion over the 2025-2034 period.

    Part IX. Renewable Energy

    Part IX would establish a standard formula to calculate the capacity fee (an equivalent to royalty payment) paid to the federal government under geothermal leases and require the Treasury to distribute a part of those receipts to the states and counties where the operations take place. Sections 80181 and 80182 interact and CBO has shown the estimate of their combined budgetary effects in the estimate for section 80181.

    Renewable Energy Fees on Federal Lands. Section 80181 would establish a formula to calculate rental rates and the capacity fees paid to the federal government under solar and wind leases on federal land. A capacity fee is a royalty based on the energy produced and sold under those leases. Under current law, BLM establishes and can modify those formulas by rule. The capacity fee calculation under this provision would apply to existing and new leases and would, in CBO’s estimation, increase the total offsetting receipts collected relative to current law. Using information from BLM on current and estimated future wind and solar projects, CBO estimates that enacting the provision would increase offsetting receipts by $180 million over the 2025-2034 period, after adjusting for the effects of sequestration.

    Renewable Energy Revenue Sharing. Section 80182 would require the Treasury to distribute 25 percent of the offsetting receipts from wind and solar leases on federal land to the states and counties where those operations take place. The federal government does not currently distribute any of those receipts to states. CBO estimates that enacting this provision would increase direct spending over the 2025-2034 period. This section interacts with section 80181 and CBO has shown its budgetary effects in the estimate for section 80181.

    Subtitle B. Water, Wildlife, and Fisheries

    Subtitle B would rescind certain unobligated balances from funds directly appropriated in the 2022 reconciliation act and provide funding for water storage and conveyance activities. CBO estimates that enacting the subtitle would increase outlays, on net, by $2.4 billion over the 2025-2034 period.

    Rescission of Funds. Sections 80201 and 80202 would rescind certain unobligated balances of funds directly appropriated in the 2022 reconciliation act. Using information from OMB, CBO estimates that enacting those sections would decrease outlays over the 2025-2034 period by the following amounts:

    • $100 million for Investing in Coastal Communities and Climate Resilience; and

    $29 million for Facilities of National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

    Surface Water Storage Enhancement. Section 80203 would provide $2 billion in 2025 to the Bureau of Reclamation (BOR) to increase the capacity of existing surface water storage facilities. The section also would exempt those funds from cost-sharing, matching, and reimbursement requirements, which are typical for financing projects for developing water storage.

    CBO expects that the funds would allow BOR to move forward with the Shasta Dam and Reservoir Enlargement Project by removing the requirement to engage a nonfederal partner. Based on historical spending patterns and information from the agency, CBO estimates that enacting this provision would increase direct spending by $2 billion over the 2025-2034 period.

    Water Conveyance Enhancement. Section 80204 would directly appropriate $500 million in 2025 to BOR to increase the capacity of existing water conveyance facilities. Based on historical spending patterns and information from the agency, CBO expects that the amounts provided would be fully spent over the 2025-2034 period.

    Section 80204 also would exempt the amounts provided from cost-sharing, matching, and reimbursement requirements, which are typical for financing conveyance projects. That could affect spending subject to appropriation, but CBO has not reviewed this provision for such effects.

    Subtitle C. Federal Lands

    Subtitle C would prohibit BLM from implementing certain resource management plans and rescind unobligated funds from the Forest Service and BLM. CBO estimates that enacting the subtitle would decrease direct spending by $1.6 billion over the 2025-2034 period.

    Prohibition on the Implementation of Field Office Management Plans. Sections 80301 through 80305 would prohibit DOI from implementing, administering, or enforcing five BLM Resource Management Plans made final between October 2024 and January 2025 for the Rock Springs and Buffalo Field Offices in Wyoming, the Miles City Field Office in Montana, a statewide plan for North Dakota, and the Colorado River Valley and Grand Junction Field Offices in Colorado. After adjusting for the effects of sequestration, CBO estimates that enacting those provisions would decrease direct spending by a total of $261 million over the 2026-2034 period.

    Rescissions of Funds. Sections 80306, 80307, 80308, and 80309 would rescind certain unobligated balances of funds directly appropriated in the 2022 reconciliation act. Using information from the OMB, CBO estimates that enacting those rescissions would decrease outlays over the 2025-2034 period by $287 million for the Forest Service, the National Park Service, and BLM.

    Celebrating America’s 250th Anniversary. Section 80310 would provide $190 million for DOI to commemorate the 250th anniversary of the founding of the United States of America and establish and maintain a statuary park named the National Garden of American Heroes. Based on historical spending patterns, CBO expects that the directly appropriated amounts would be fully spent over the 2025-2034 period.

    Long-Term Contracts for the Forest Service. Section 80311 would require the Forest Service to enter into at least one 20-year contract for timber harvesting per region each year over the 2025-2029 period. CBO expects that the sales required within one year of enactment would occur in a later year.

    This section would establish the contracts’ terms and conditions. Under current law, proceeds from national forests’ timber sales are deposited into various funds, depending on the authority under which the sale is conducted; amounts deposited into those funds can be spent without further appropriation. This provision would require the proceeds from the sales conducted under the legislation to be deposited in the Treasury. Thus, CBO estimates that enacting the provision would decrease direct spending over the 2025-2034 period.

    CBO estimates that section 80311 would interact with section 80313. That section would require the Forest Service to harvest and sell a minimum of 25 percent more timber than the amounts it sold in fiscal year 2024.

    CBO estimates that of the additional timber sales conducted under section 80313, half could be harvested through the required long-term contracts. Using data on timber sales and accounting for the interaction between the two sections, CBO estimates that enacting those sections would increase offsetting receipts by $111 million over the 2025-2034 period.

    Long-Term Contracts for the Bureau of Land Management. Section 80312 would require BLM to enter at least one 20-year contract for timber harvesting per region each year over the 2025-2029 period.

    This section would establish the contracts’ terms and conditions. Under current law, most proceeds of timber sales on public land under the jurisdiction of BLM are deposited into various funds depending on the authority under which the sale is conducted; amounts deposited into those funds can be spent without further appropriation. This provision would require the proceeds from the sales conducted under the legislation to be deposited in the Treasury as offsetting receipts. Thus, CBO estimates that enacting the provision would decrease direct spending over the 2025-2034 period.

    CBO estimates that half of the timber sold under section 80314 could be harvested under long-term contracts. That section would require BLM to harvest and sell a minimum of 25 percent more timber than it sold in fiscal year 2024. Using data on timber sales and accounting for the interaction between the sections, CBO estimates that enacting those sections would increase offsetting receipts by $46 million over the 2025-2034 period. Furthermore, CBO expects that the sales required within a year of enactment would occur in a later year. CBO expects that section 80312 would interact with section 80314 and the combined estimated budgetary effects are shown in the estimate for section 80312.

    Bureau of Land Management Land in Nevada. Section 80315 would direct DOI to identify and convey federal land, managed by BLM, in non-metropolitan areas of four counties in Nevada. The provision would require BLM to sell the land below fair-market value upon request by certain counties to use it for affordable housing. Otherwise, the land would be sold or exchanged for a price that is at or above fair-market value. Proceeds from those sales are recorded in the budget as offsetting receipts.

    Based on public maps describing available land for disposal in the state and information from BLM, CBO estimates that roughly 400,000 acres are identified for conveyance under this section. Much of that land is in Pershing County and is estimated to be encumbered with mining claims, millsites, or tunnel sites (roughly 250,000 acres). Encumbered land would be offered at fair-market value to the owner of the encumbrance under this section, and CBO expects that those acres would be conveyed over the 2025‑2034 period. For the remaining acres, CBO used a 50 percent probability that some of the available land would be identified for disposal and a 50 percent probability that the land so identified would be conveyed. On that basis, CBO estimates that 40,000 acres would be conveyed under the legislation over the next 10 years.

    Using information from DOI, related organizations, and past land sales in the state, CBO estimates that enacting this section would reduce direct spending by $819 million over the 2025-2034 period.

    Forest Service Land in Nevada. Section 80316 would direct the Department of Agriculture to identify and convey federal land managed by the Forest Service in Washoe County, Nevada. The provision would require the department to sell the land below fair-market value upon request by the county to use for affordable housing. Otherwise, the land would be sold at or above fair-market value. Proceeds from the sales would be recorded in the budget as offsetting receipts. Based on information from other land sales, CBO estimates that enacting section 80316 would reduce direct spending by $7 million over the 2025-2034 period.

    Federal Land in Utah. Section 80317 would require DOI to convey roughly 11,000 acres of federal land managed by BLM in Utah. The section would require DOI to sell the land at or above fair-market value. CBO expects that identifying and conveying the land would take several years. Proceeds from the sales would be recorded in the budget as offsetting receipts Using information on land values from BLM, CBO estimates that enacting section 80317 would reduce direct spending by $293 million over the 2025-2034 period.

    Revenues

    Enacting the legislation would increase revenues by $1.2 billion over the 2025-2034 period. (see On that basis, CBO estimates that enacting section 80151 would increase revenues, on net, by $1.2 billion over the 2025-2034 period.

    Uncertainty

    Many of CBO’s estimates for spending and revenues are subject to uncertainty because they rely on underlying projections and other estimates that are themselves uncertain.

    Several areas of the legislation are subject to particular uncertainty:

    • Projecting bonus bids, rents, and royalties from onshore and offshore oil, gas, and coal leasing depends on future prices of those fuels and minerals, the number of new leases that would begin production within the 10-year window, and the amount of production per lease, all of which are subject to market conditions and individual responses by public and private-sector entities;
    • Projecting bonus bids, rents, and royalties from renewable-energy leases depends on future prices of electricity and grid capacity, the number of new leases that would produce electricity, and the amount of electricity produced per lease, all of which are subject to market conditions and individual responses by public and private-sector entities;
    • Estimating bonus bids for leases in the National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska and the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge requires CBO to make assumptions that might differ from those of potential bidders, including our projections of long-term oil and gas prices and estimated production costs. For more information about the uncertainty of the estimates related to Alaska, see the discussion above in the section “Part III. Alaska”;
    • Anticipating market conditions and the risk tolerance of nonfederal entities make it difficult to project the amount of fees that those entities would pay for exemptions from judicial review under section 80151;
    • Projecting timelines is difficult for federally funded projects that could accelerate or newly start because of the judicial review provision; and
    • Projecting receipts from the conveyance of federal land in Nevada and Utah because of uncertain timelines, land value, and acreage.

    Pay-As-You-Go Considerations

    The Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010 establishes budget-reporting and enforcement procedures for legislation affecting direct spending or revenues. The net changes in outlays and revenues that are subject to those pay-as-you-go procedures are shown in Acting Chief, Natural and Physical Resources Cost Estimates Unit

    Kathleen FitzGerald
    Chief, Public and Private Mandates Unit

    Christina Hawley Anthony
    Deputy Director of Budget Analysis

    H. Samuel Papenfuss 
    Deputy Director of Budget Analysis

    Chad Chirico 
    Director of Budget Analysis

    Phillip L. Swagel

    Director, Congressional Budget Office

    [Table 2 begins on the next page.]

    Return to Revenues

    Table 2.

    Estimated Changes in Direct Spending and Revenues Under Reconciliation Recommendations Title VIII, Committee on Natural Resources, as Ordered Reported on May 6, 2025

     

    By Fiscal Year, Millions of Dollars

       
     

    2025

    2026

    2027

    2028

    2029

    2030

    2031

    2032

    2033

    2034

    2025-2029

    2025-2034

     

    Increases or Decreases (-) in Direct Spending

       

    Subtitle A. Energy and Mineral Resources

                       

    Part I. Oil and Gas

                           

    Sec. 80101, Onshore Oil and Gas Lease Salesa

                         

    Budget Authority

    0

    -210

    -686

    -1,102

    -1,333

    -1,552

    -1,730

    -1,854

    -2,043

    -2,260

    -3,331

    -12,770

    Estimated Outlays

    0

    -210

    -686

    -1,102

    -1,333

    -1,552

    -1,730

    -1,854

    -2,043

    -2,260

    -3,331

    -12,770

    Part II: Geothermal

                           

    Sec. 80111, Geothermal Leasingb

                         

    Budget Authority

    0

    -1

    -1

    -2

    -2

    -3

    -3

    -3

    -3

    -5

    -6

    -23

    Estimated Outlays

    0

    -1

    -1

    -2

    -2

    -3

    -3

    -3

    -3

    -5

    -6

    -23

    Part III. Alaska

                           

    Sec. 80121, Coastal Plain Oil and Gas Leasing

                           

    Budget Authority

    0

    -219

    -3

    -15

    -2

    -15

    -3

    -16

    -332

    -341

    -239

    -946

    Estimated Outlays

    0

    -219

    -3

    -15

    -2

    -15

    -3

    -16

    -332

    -341

    -239

    -946

    Sec. 80122, National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska

                           

    Budget Authority

    0

    -80

    -5

    -90

    -6

    -95

    -11

    -97

    -34

    -114

    -181

    -532

    Estimated Outlays

    0

    -80

    -5

    -90

    -6

    -95

    -11

    -97

    -34

    -114

    -181

    -532

    Part IV. Mining

                           

    Sec. 80131, Superior National Forest Lands in Minnesota

                         

    Budget Authority

    -1

    *

    -1

    *

    -1

    *

    -1

    -22

    -28

    -27

    -3

    -81

    Estimated Outlays

    -1

    *

    -1

    *

    -1

    *

    -1

    -22

    -28

    -27

    -3

    -81

    Sec. 80132, Ambler Road in Alaska

                         

    Budget Authority

    0

    *

    -1

    *

    -1

    *

    -1

    *

    -1

    *

    -2

    -4

    Estimated Outlays

    0

    *

    -1

    *

    -1

    *

    -1

    *

    -1

    *

    -2

    -4

    Part V. Coal

                           

    Sec. 80141, Coal Leasingc

                           

    Budget Authority

    0

    84

    67

    61

    57

    -107

    -101

    -98

    -99

    -101

    269

    -237

    Estimated Outlays

    0

    84

    67

    61

    57

    -107

    -101

    -98

    -99

    -101

    269

    -237

    Sec. 80144, Authorization to Mine Federal Minerals

                           

    Budget Authority

    0

    -14

    -15

    -14

    1

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    -42

    -42

    Estimated Outlays

    0

    -14

    -15

    -14

    1

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    -42

    -42

                         

    (Continued)

    Table 2.

    Estimated Changes in Direct Spending and Revenues Under Reconciliation Recommendations Title VIII, Committee on Natural Resources, as Ordered Reported on May 6, 2025

    (Continued)

     

    By Fiscal Year, Millions of Dollars

       
     

    2025

    2026

    2027

    2028

    2029

    2030

    2031

    2032

    2033

    2034

    2025-2029

    2025-2034

     

    Increases or Decreases (-) in Direct Spending

       

    Part VI. NEPA

                           

    Sec. 80151, Project Sponsor Opt-In Fees for Environmental Reviews

                         

    Budget Authority

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    Estimated Outlays

    0

    0

    *

    5

    15

    25

    30

    35

    40

    40

    20

    190

    Sec. 80152, Rescission Relating to Environmental and Data Collection

                         

    Budget Authority

    -25

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    -25

    -25

    Estimated Outlays

    -7

    -6

    -6

    -6

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    -25

    -25

    Part VII. Miscellaneous

                           

    Sec. 80161, Protest Fees

                           

    Budget Authority

    0

    *

    -1

    *

    -1

    *

    -1

    *

    -2

    *

    -2

    -5

    Estimated Outlays

    0

    *

    -1

    *

    -1

    *

    -1

    *

    -2

    *

    -2

    -5

    Part VIII: Offshore Oil and Gas Leasing

                       

    Sec. 80171, Mandatory Offshore Oil and Gas Lease Salesd

                         

    Budget Authority

    0

    -160

    -170

    -530

    -390

    -540

    -800

    -1,010

    -1,240

    -1,450

    -1,250

    -6,290

    Estimated Outlays

    0

    -160

    -170

    -530

    -390

    -540

    -800

    -1,010

    -1,240

    -1,450

    -1,250

    -6,290

    Sec. 80173, Limitations on Amount of Distributed Qualified Outer Continental Shelf Revenues

                       

    Budget Authority

    0

    150

    140

    140

    140

    140

    140

    145

    150

    150

    570

    1,295

    Estimated Outlays

    0

    120

    120

    130

    140

    140

    140

    145

    150

    150

    510

    1,235

    Part IX: Renewable Energy

                           

    Sec. 80181, Renewable Energy Fees on Federal Landse

                         

    Budget Authority

    0

    -5

    -5

    -6

    -13

    -21

    -28

    -27

    -37

    -38

    -29

    -180

    Estimated Outlays

    0

    -5

    -5

    -6

    -13

    -21

    -28

    -27

    -37

    -38

    -29

    -180

                         

    (Continued)

    Table 2.

    Estimated Changes in Direct Spending and Revenues Under Reconciliation Recommendations Title VIII, Committee on Natural Resources, as Ordered Reported on May 6, 2025

    (Continued)

     

    By Fiscal Year, Millions of Dollars

       
     

    2025

    2026

    2027

    2028

    2029

    2030

    2031

    2032

    2033

    2034

    2025-2029

    2025-2034

     

    Increases or Decreases (-) in Direct Spending

       

    Subtitle B: Water, Wildlife, and Fisheries

                       

    Sec. 80201, Rescission of Funds for Investing in Coastal Communities and Climate Resilience

                       

    Budget Authority

    -280

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    -280

    -280

    Estimated Outlays

    -40

    -20

    -15

    -15

    -10

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    -100

    -100

    Sec. 80202, Rescission of Funds for Facilities of National Atmospheric Administration and National Marine Sanctuaries

                       

    Budget Authority

    -29

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    -29

    -29

    Estimated Outlays

    -7

    -7

    -7

    -6

    -2

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    -29

    -29

    Sec. 80203, Surface Water Storage Enhancement

                           

    Budget Authority

    2,000

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    2,000

    2,000

    Estimated Outlays

    0

    31

    71

    108

    109

    209

    417

    418

    418

    219

    319

    2,000

    Sec. 80204, Water Conveyance Enhancement

                         

    Budget Authority

    500

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    500

    500

    Estimated Outlays

    0

    25

    175

    150

    150

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    500

    500

    Subtitle C: Federal Lands

                           

    Sec. 80301, Prohibition on the Implementation of the Rock Springs Field Office, Wyoming, Resource Management Plan

                       

    Budget Authority

    0

    -4

    *

    *

    -21

    -24

    -26

    -29

    -29

    -30

    -25

    -163

    Estimated Outlays

    0

    -4

    *

    *

    -21

    -24

    -26

    -29

    -29

    -30

    -25

    -163

    Sec. 80303, Prohibition on the Implementation of the Miles City Field Office, Montana, Resource Management Plan

                       

    Budget Authority

    0

    -3

    -3

    -3

    -3

    -4

    0

    0

    0

    0

    -12

    -16

    Estimated Outlays

    0

    -3

    -3

    -3

    -3

    -4

    0

    0

    0

    0

    -12

    -16

    Sec. 80304, Prohibition on the Implementation of the North Dakota Resource Management Plan

                       

    Budget Authority

    0

    -4

    *

    *

    *

    *

    -1

    *

    *

    *

    -4

    -5

    Estimated Outlays

    0

    -4

    *

    *

    *

    *

    -1

    *

    *

    *

    -4

    -5

    Sec. 80305, Prohibition on the Implementation of the Colorado River Valley Field Office and Grand Junction Field Office Resource Management Plans

                       

    Budget Authority

    0

    -4

    *

    *

    -12

    -12

    -12

    -12

    -12

    -13

    -16

    -77

    Estimated Outlays

    0

    -4

    *

    *

    -12

    -12

    -12

    -12

    -12

    -13

    -16

    -77

                         

    (Continued)

    Table 2.

    Estimated Changes in Direct Spending and Revenues Under Reconciliation Recommendations Title VIII, Committee on Natural Resources, as Ordered Reported on May 6, 2025

    (Continued)

     

    By Fiscal Year, Millions of Dollars

       
     

    2025

    2026

    2027

    2028

    2029

    2030

    2031

    2032

    2033

    2034

    2025-2029

    2025-2034

     

    Increases or Decreases (-) in Direct Spending

       

    Sec. 80306, Rescission of Forest Service Funds

                         

    Budget Authority

    -8

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    -8

    -8

    Estimated Outlays

    -3

    -2

    -1

    -1

    -1

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    -8

    -8

    Sec. 80307, Rescission of National Park Service and Bureau of Land Management Funds

                       

    Budget Authority

    -7

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    -7

    -7

    Estimated Outlays

    -2

    -1

    -1

    -1

    -1

    -1

    0

    0

    0

    0

    -6

    -7

    Sec. 80308, Rescission of Bureau of Land Management and National Park Service Funds

                       

    Budget Authority

    -5

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    -5

    -5

    Estimated Outlays

    -2

    -1

    -1

    -1

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    -5

    -5

    Sec. 80309, Rescission of National Park Service Funds

                           

    Budget Authority

    -317

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    -317

    -317

    Estimated Outlays

    -75

    -63

    -44

    -36

    -26

    -20

    -3

    0

    0

    0

    -244

    -267

    Sec. 80310, Celebrating America’s 250th Anniversary

                           

    Budget Authority

    190

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    190

    190

    Estimated Outlays

    15

    128

    25

    12

    10

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    190

    190

    Sec. 80311, Long-Term Contracts for the Forest Servicef

                         

    Budget Authority

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    -19

    -21

    -22

    -24

    -25

    0

    -111

    Estimated Outlays

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    -19

    -21

    -22

    -24

    -25

    0

    -111

    Sec. 80312, Long-Term Contracts for the Bureau of Land Managementg

                         

    Budget Authority

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    -8

    -8

    -10

    -10

    -10

    0

    -46

    Estimated Outlays

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    -8

    -8

    -10

    -10

    -10

    0

    -46

    Sec. 80315, Bureau of Land Management Land in Nevada

                         

    Budget Authority

    0

    -91

    -91

    -91

    -91

    -91

    -91

    -91

    -91

    -91

    -364

    -819

    Estimated Outlays

    0

    -91

    -91

    -91

    -91

    -91

    -91

    -91

    -91

    -91

    -364

    -819

    Sec. 80316, Forest Service Land in Nevada

                           

    Budget Authority

    0

    -3

    -4

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    -7

    -7

    Estimated Outlays

    0

    -3

    -4

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    -7

    -7

    Sec. 80317, Federal Land in Utah

                         

    Budget Authority

    0

    -11

    -56

    -70

    -70

    -86

    0

    0

    0

    0

    -207

    -293

    Estimated Outlays

    0

    -11

    -56

    -70

    -70

    -86

    0

    0

    0

    0

    -207

    -293

                         

    (Continued)

    Table 2.

    Estimated Changes in Direct Spending and Revenues Under Reconciliation Recommendations Title VIII, Committee on Natural Resources, as Ordered Reported on May 6, 2025

    (Continued)

     

    By Fiscal Year, Millions of Dollars

       
     

    2025

    2026

    2027

    2028

    2029

    2030

    2031

    2032

    2033

    2034

    2025-2029

    2025-2034

     

    Increases or Decreases (-) in Direct Spending

       

    Total Changes

                           

    Budget Authority

    2,018

    -575

    -835

    -1,722

    -1,748

    -2,437

    -2,698

    -3,146

    -3,835

    -4,355

    -2,862

    -19,333

    Estimated Outlays

    -122

    -521

    -659

    -1,523

    -1,504

    -2,224

    -2,254

    -2,693

    -3,377

    -4,096

    -4,329

    -18,973

     

    Increases in Revenues

       

    Sec. 80151, Project Sponsor Opt-In Fees for Environmental Reviews

                         

    Estimated Revenues

    0

    65

    130

    130

    135

    140

    140

    145

    150

    150

    460

    1,185

    Total Changes

                           

    Estimated Revenues

    0

    65

    130

    130

    135

    140

    140

    145

    150

    150

    460

    1,185

     

    Net Decrease in the Deficit

    From Changes in Direct Spending and Revenues

       

    Effect on the Deficit

    -122

    -586

    -789

    -1,653

    -1,639

    -2,364

    -2,394

    -2,838

    -3,527

    -4,246

    -4,789

    -20,158

    a. Includes amounts for sections 80102, 80103, 80104, and 80105.

    b. Includes amounts for section 80112.

    c. Includes amounts for sections 80142, 80143, and 80302.

    d. Includes amounts for section 80172.

    e. Includes amounts for section 80182.

    f. Includes amounts for section 80313.

    g. Includes amounts for section 80314.

    MIL OSI USA News –

    May 20, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Video: Secretary-General/Iraq, Gaza, Ukraine & other topics – Daily Press Briefing | United Nations

    Source: United Nations (Video News)

    Noon Briefing by Stéphane Dujarric, Spokesperson for the Secretary-General.

    ———————————
    Highlights:

    Secretary-General / Iraq
    Gaza
    Occupied Palestinian Territory
    Ukraine
    Libya
    78th World Health Assembly
    World Fair Play Day

    ———————————
    SECRETARY-GENERAL /IRAQ
    The Secretary-General landed back in New York a few hours ago. He will be in Headquarters at about 3 o’clock for the resumed session with the General Assembly on the UN80 initiative and that will be webcast.
    In Iraq, where he attended and addressed the Summit of the League of Arab States. In the remarks that he delivered, the Secretary-General reiterated our constant calls for an urgently needed permanent ceasefire in Gaza, the unconditional release of all hostages and the need for free flow of humanitarian aid. “Only a two-State solution can deliver sustainable peace,” he said.
    He also spoke about the situation in other parts of the region, including Syria, Yemen, Lebanon, Sudan and Somalia. And underscored the vital partnership between the United Nations and the League of Arab States. 
    On the margins of the Summit, he held a trilateral meeting with the Chairman of the African Union, Mahamoud Youssouf, and the Secretary-General of the League of Arab States, Mr. Abu Al-Ghait.
    Their meeting focused on Sudan, and how to better cooperate and maintain a regular contact to better coordinate all initiatives in relation to peace in Sudan.
    He also met with the Prime Minister of Jordan, Jafar Hassan, where they discussed developments in the region, and obviously what is going on in Gaza. Separately, he discussed the situation in Lebanon with Prime Minister Nawaf Salam of Lebanon.
    On Sunday, he spoke with the Prime Minister of Iraq [Mohammed] Shia’ Al Sudani. The Secretary-General during those talks reaffirmed that we remain fully committed to continuing to support the Government and people of Iraq following the planned departure of the UN Assistance Mission in Iraq [UNAMI]. As you know, the mission’s mandate will not be extended beyond 31 December of this year.
    The Secretary-General also addressed the UN staff in Baghdad to express his thanks to them. He laid a wreath at a memorial in the UN Compound in honour of 22 of our colleagues, who as you know, were brutally killed during the terrorist attack at the Canal Hotel on August 19 2003. Mr. Guterres said that “this memorial is as a clear reminder of the vital work that the United Nations does around the world — and the dangers our people face in carrying out that work.”

    GAZA
    The Secretary-General is alarmed by the intensification of Israeli air strikes and ground operations in the Gaza Strip, which have resulted in the killing of hundreds of Palestinian civilians in recent days, including many women and children, and, of course, large-scale evacuation orders.
    The Secretary-General calls for the rapid, safe, and unimpeded delivery of humanitarian assistance at scale directly to civilians, in order to avert famine, alleviate widespread suffering, and prevent further loss of life.
    The Secretary-General continues to call for a permanent ceasefire and the immediate and unconditional release of all hostages and welcomes the ongoing efforts by the mediators to reach a deal in Gaza. He has repeatedly warned that the continued violence and the destruction will only compound civilian suffering and heighten the risk of a broader regional conflict.
    The Secretary-General reiterates that civilians must be respected and they must be protected at all times, and that all parties must strictly adhere to their obligations under international humanitarian law.
    The Secretary-General firmly rejects any forced displacement of the Palestinian population.

    Full Highlights:
    https://www.un.org/sg/en/content/noon-briefing-highlight?date%5Bvalue%5D%5Bdate%5D=19%20May%202025

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I0Ba_bDpvvo

    MIL OSI Video –

    May 20, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Video: Iraq: UN Chief Commends Progress & Urges Action on Gaza, Lebanon & Sudan | 34th LAS Summit

    Source: United Nations (Video News)

    Secretary-General Antonio Guterres praised Iraq’s progress since 2004 for, “strengthening institutions, resolving disputes through dialogue, providing humanitarian assistance and fostering sustainable development and human rights.”

    The Secretary-General spoke at the Summit of the League of Arab States today (17 May) in Baghdad, Iraq.

    “I am alarmed by reported plans by Israel to expand ground operations and more,” Guterres said during his address. “And I emphasize that the United Nations will not participate in any so-called aid operation that does not adhere to international law and the humanitarian principles of humanity, impartiality, independence and neutrality,” he added.

    He stressed the urgent need for support to UNRWA, saying, “I reiterate my appeal for the urgent and full support of UNRWA’s work, including financial support. We reject the repeated displacement of the Gaza population – and we obviously reject any question of forced displacement outside of Gaza.”

    Turning to Lebanon, Guterres called for full implementation of Security Council resolution 1701. “Sovereignty and territorial integrity of Lebanon must be respected, and the Government of Lebanon must have control over all Lebanese territory,” he said. “I welcome the stated commitment by Lebanese officials to ensure a state monopoly over weapons.”

    On Sudan, the Secretary-General said a unified international effort was critical to stem worsening conditions. “Renewed and coordinated multilateral engagement is crucial to help stem appalling violence, famine, and mass displacement,” he stated, thanking the Arab League and African Union for their cooperation in a recent high-level meeting.

    Guterres concluded by commending Iraq’s progress in the two decades since the restoration of sovereignty. “I want to recognize and commend the progress Iraq has made… strengthening institutions, resolving disputes through dialogue, providing humanitarian assistance and fostering sustainable development and human rights,” he said. “I sincerely hope that all pending issues will find a just solution by dialog.”

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NpuSQ_AlowQ

    MIL OSI Video –

    May 20, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: SCMA visits Egypt to promote development opportunities in GBA

    Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region

    SCMA visits Egypt to promote development opportunities in GBA 
         During his stay in the Egyptian capital, Cairo, Mr Tsang met the Chinese Ambassador to Egypt, Mr Liao Liqiang, and exchanged views with representatives of the political and business sectors.
     
         Mr Tsang attended today (May 19) the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area – Africa (Egypt) Economic and Trade Cooperation Exchange Conference and delivered a speech to promote the development opportunities of the GBA to the political and business sectors.
     
         Mr Tsang said that with the full support from the Central Authorities, the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region and other GBA cities complement each other’s strengths and work closely together to promote the GBA’s high-quality development. Hong Kong possesses the institutional advantages of “one country, two systems”, with a business environment that is highly market-oriented and internationalised, underpinned by the rule of law, a free flow of capital, a robust financial regulatory regime, a simple and low tax regime, and a global pool of professional talent. He encouraged enterprises to capitalise on Hong Kong’s unique advantages of having the staunch support of the motherland and being closely connected to the world by establishing a foothold in the city and tapping into the huge market of the GBA.
     
         Mr Tsang added that Hong Kong, as a world-renowned metropolis and China’s most internationalised city, should play its unique roles and functions as a “super connector” and “super value-adder”, commence more international co-operation, contribute to the country’s high-quality opening up and development, and further enhance its global influence in the changing international landscape.
     
         Mr Tsang will depart for Hong Kong this afternoon (Egypt time) and arrive on May 20.
    Issued at HKT 19:35

    NNNN

    CategoriesMIL-OSI

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News –

    May 20, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Canada: Joint statement from the leaders of Canada, the United Kingdom and France on the situation in Gaza and the West Bank

    Source: Government of Canada – Prime Minister

    “We strongly oppose the expansion of Israel’s military operations in Gaza. The level of human suffering in Gaza is intolerable. Yesterday’s announcement that Israel will allow a basic quantity of food into Gaza is wholly inadequate. We call on the Israeli Government to stop its military operations in Gaza and immediately allow humanitarian aid to enter Gaza. This must include engaging with the UN to ensure a return to delivery of aid in line with humanitarian principles. We call on Hamas to release immediately the remaining hostages they have so cruelly held since 7 October 2023.

    The Israeli Government’s denial of essential humanitarian assistance to the civilian population is unacceptable and risks breaching International Humanitarian Law. We condemn the abhorrent language used recently by members of the Israeli Government, threatening that, in their despair at the destruction of Gaza, civilians will start to relocate. Permanent forced displacement is a breach of international humanitarian law. 

    Israel suffered a heinous attack on October 7. We have always supported Israel’s right to defend Israelis against terrorism. But this escalation is wholly disproportionate.

    We will not stand by while the Netanyahu Government pursues these egregious actions. If Israel does not cease the renewed military offensive and lift its restrictions on humanitarian aid, we will take further concrete actions in response.

    We oppose any attempt to expand settlements in the West Bank. Israel must halt settlements which are illegal and undermine the viability of a Palestinian state and the security of both Israelis and Palestinians.  We will not hesitate to take further action, including targeted sanctions. 

    We strongly support the efforts led by the United States, Qatar and Egypt to secure an immediate ceasefire in Gaza. It is a ceasefire, the release of all remaining hostages and a long-term political solution that offer the best hope of ending the agony of the hostages and their families, alleviating the suffering of civilians in Gaza, ending Hamas’ control of Gaza and achieving a pathway to a two-state solution, consistent with the goals of the 18 June conference in New York co-chaired by Saudi Arabia and France. These negotiations need to succeed, and we must all work towards the implementation of a two-state solution, which is the only way to bring long-lasting peace and security that both Israelis and Palestinians deserve and ensure long-term stability in the region.

    We will continue to work with the Palestinian Authority, regional partners, Israel and the United States to finalize consensus on arrangements for Gaza’s future, building on the Arab plan. We affirm the important role of the High-level Two-State Solution Conference at the UN in June in building international consensus around this aim. And we are committed to recognizing a Palestinian state as a contribution to achieving a two-state solution and are prepared to work with others to this end.”

    MIL OSI Canada News –

    May 20, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Global: Disaster authoritarianism: how autocratic regimes deal with earthquakes

    Source: The Conversation – UK – By Nimesh Dhungana, Lecturer in Disasters and Global Health, Humanitarian and Conflict Response Institute, University of Manchester

    An earthquake that struck south-east Asia in late March is thought to have killed more than 3,000 people in Myanmar, a country ruled by a military junta that has blocked humanitarian aid and continued waging war on quake-ravaged rebel territory.

    I am interested in how authoritarian regimes handle disasters and whether they disrupt or reinforce the ruling elite’s agenda. My research has led me to Tibet, which has endured Chinese occupation since 1951 and suffered a 7.1-magnitude earthquake in early January 2025.

    Beijing controls the access of independent media and international observers in Tibet. What we know about the disaster’s impact is largely based on initial reporting by the Chinese media, which has claimed the loss of 126 lives and damage to roads and communication networks.

    Tibetan sources have, however, contended that there has been much greater destruction, including to a number of monasteries and nunneries across the region.


    Get your news from actual experts, straight to your inbox. Sign up to our daily newsletter to receive all The Conversation UK’s latest coverage of news and research, from politics and business to the arts and sciences.


    Following the earthquake, the Chinese president, Xi Jinping, ordered “all-out search and rescue efforts” and pledged a rapid recovery. The constrained political environment has meant that Chinese relief agencies and the Chinese state-run media have controlled the narrative, praising Beijing’s capacity for “speed and compassion” in mobilising rescue efforts while using the disaster to highlight China’s record of “good governance and putting people and their lives first”.

    These accounts not only fail to report on the civic responses to disaster, such as mutual aid networks organised by Tibetans both locally and internationally, but they tend to overlook the immediate concerns of the affected communities.

    Survivors and activists using social media to challenge Chinese media narratives of purported success in rescue and relief efforts have faced censorship and outright hostility from the Chinese authorities. A previous study, looking at the 2008 Sichuan earthquake, found that communities that were considered a challenge to Chinese authority had their demands for relief suppressed.

    Firefighters shift rubble in Shigatse on January 7 2025.
    China News Service, CC BY-SA

    The earthquake has sparked further concerns among Tibetans that Chinese authorities will use the disaster to tighten their grip on the region.

    The situation is reminiscent of the April 2010 earthquake that struck Tibet’s Yushu region, claiming more than 2,600 lives and causing significant disruption to local life. The earthquake enabled China to push its vision of modernity and development in Tibet amid allegations of corruption in relief distribution and forced relocations.

    The aftermath revealed a divergence between the Chinese interpretation of recovery and what many Tibetans saw as essential for preserving and promoting their unique cultural identity.

    In their study of the Zimbabwean state’s response to tropical cyclone Idai in 2019, anthropologist Denboy Kudejira described this phenomenon as “disaster authoritarianism”: when an authoritarian regime exploits a disaster to reassert its power. Akin to China’s model, the Zimbabwean government restricted the involvement of non-state groups in longer-term recovery efforts.

    The relative lack of attention journalists and politicians abroad pay to Tibet makes this problem more acute. For instance, the wildfires in Los Angeles erupted at the same time as the earthquake, but garnered greater and more sustained media attention that mounted scrutiny on responsible agencies. By contrast, the Tibet earthquake quickly faded from the news.

    ‘Confrontational politics emerging’

    For Tibetans, challenging disaster authoritarianism is part of a delicate political struggle. Tibet’s spiritual leader, the Dalai Lama, called the disaster “a natural phenomenon and not the result of human activities”, while urging Tibetans not to be “angry with the Chinese”. This appears to reflect his long-held wisdom that antagonising Chinese authorities will invite further hardship for communities enduring political marginalisation.

    Others are more sceptical. Some people inside Tibet have questioned the official number of casualties reported by Beijing and pushed Chinese authorities to clarify the scale of the tragedy.

    There are signs of more confrontational politics emerging. The International Campaign for Tibet, which lobbies for self-determination for Tibetans, has labelled the disaster “the silent earthquake” and accused Chinese authorities of censoring the true nature of suffering.

    Another rights group, the Tibetan Rights Collective, has highlighted China’s interventions in Tibet that have made the region more geologically unstable, including the building of hydropower dams and roads. Recent research shows that China’s push to build infrastructure in the region has increased the risk of disasters, such as floods and landslides, for downstream communities in south Asia.

    Research a colleague and I conducted during the pandemic showed that community groups can compensate for gaps in state-led disaster responses, and alert where help is needed. But this depends on public participation and grassroots organising that, in authoritarian contexts such as Tibet and Myanmar, is heavily restricted.

    The climate crisis is increasing the risk of disasters at the same time as there is widespread fear of increasing authoritarianism globally. We should all worry about how these two trends might interact.

    Nimesh Dhungana does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    – ref. Disaster authoritarianism: how autocratic regimes deal with earthquakes – https://theconversation.com/disaster-authoritarianism-how-autocratic-regimes-deal-with-earthquakes-248188

    MIL OSI – Global Reports –

    May 20, 2025
  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Joint statement from the leaders of the United Kingdom, France and Canada on the situation in Gaza and the West Bank

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    Press release

    Joint statement from the leaders of the United Kingdom, France and Canada on the situation in Gaza and the West Bank

    Joint statement from the leaders of the United Kingdom, France and Canada on the situation in Gaza and the West Bank.

    We strongly oppose the expansion of Israel’s military operations in Gaza. The level of human suffering in Gaza is intolerable. Yesterday’s announcement that Israel will allow a basic quantity of food into Gaza is wholly inadequate. We call on the Israeli Government to stop its military operations in Gaza and immediately allow humanitarian aid to enter Gaza. This must include engaging with the UN to ensure a return to delivery of aid in line with humanitarian principles. We call on Hamas to release immediately the remaining hostages they have so cruelly held since 7 October 2023.

    The Israeli Government’s denial of essential humanitarian assistance to the civilian population is unacceptable and risks breaching International Humanitarian Law. We condemn the abhorrent language used recently by members of the Israeli Government, threatening that, in their despair at the destruction of Gaza, civilians will start to relocate. Permanent forced displacement is a breach of international humanitarian law. 

    Israel suffered a heinous attack on October 7. We have always supported Israel’s right to defend Israelis against terrorism. But this escalation is wholly disproportionate.

    We will not stand by while the Netanyahu Government pursues these egregious actions. If Israel does not cease the renewed military offensive and lift its restrictions on humanitarian aid, we will take further concrete actions in response.

    We oppose any attempt to expand settlements in the West Bank. Israel must halt settlements which are illegal and undermine the viability of a Palestinian state and the security of both Israelis and Palestinians.  We will not hesitate to take further action, including targeted sanctions. 

    We strongly support the efforts led by the United States, Qatar and Egypt to secure an immediate ceasefire in Gaza. It is a ceasefire, the release of all remaining hostages and a long-term political solution that offer the best hope of ending the agony of the hostages and their families, alleviating the suffering of civilians in Gaza, ending Hamas’ control of Gaza and achieving a pathway to a two-state solution, consistent with the goals of the 18 June conference in New York co-chaired by Saudi Arabia and France. These negotiations need to succeed, and we must all work towards the implementation of a two-state solution, which is the only way to bring long-lasting peace and security that both Israelis and Palestinians deserve, and ensure long-term stability in the region.

    We will continue to work with the Palestinian Authority, regional partners, Israel and the United States to finalise consensus on arrangements for Gaza’s future, building on the Arab plan. We affirm the important role of the High-level Two-State Solution Conference at the UN in June in building international consensus around this aim. And we are committed to recognising a Palestinian state as a contribution to achieving a two-state solution and are prepared to work with others to this end.

    Share this page

    The following links open in a new tab

    • Share on Facebook (opens in new tab)
    • Share on Twitter (opens in new tab)

    Updates to this page

    Published 19 May 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom –

    May 20, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Africa: Call for banking sector to ensure financial systems are inclusive

    Source: South Africa News Agency

    Minister in the Presidency for Women, Youth and Persons with Disabilities Sindisiwe Chikunga has called on the banking sector to be intentional in designing financial systems that assist the underserved and empower the marginalised.

    Addressing the Group of Twenty (G20) Breakfast-Round Table on the Empowerment of Women and Disability Inclusion in the Banking Sector, the Minister emphasised that financial inclusion is not a luxury but it is a right that is a critical enabler of economic independence, dignity, and equality.

    “Yet, across the world and particularly here in South Africa, too many women remain excluded from basic financial services without bank accounts, denied access to credit and disconnected from investment opportunities.

    “This exclusion is even more pronounced for women living with disabilities, rural women, young women and women in the informal employment,” Chikunga said on Monday in Johannesburg.

    The breakfast meeting was aimed at engaging the banking sector in investing in the work of the Empowerment of Women Working Group and the G20 Disability Inclusion Initiatives.

    The Minister encouraged the banking sector to reimagine financial systems by ensuring they serve women entrepreneurs, especially those leading micro and small enterprises; create demand-driven financial products tailored to women’s lived realities and incentivise financial institutions to become more inclusive through policy and innovation.

    Furthermore, Chikunga suggested that the banking sector invest in digital literacy, infrastructure and access to technology for women and persons with disabilities as well as integrate inclusion into the very architecture of economic planning.

    “We must also look at the role of care infrastructure not as a social cost but as an economic multiplier. Investment in the care economy is investment in jobs, community wellbeing and women’s ability to fully participate in the workforce.

    “Together, we must not only reimagine, but also actively innovate alternative pathways to building an economy that is dynamic, resilient, and inclusive enough to truly leave no one behind.

    “Together, let’s explore practical strategies, share success stories, break barriers, challenge stereotypes and fast track the development of financing models that unlock the full economic potential of women and persons with disabilities. Together, lets create a banking environment where everyone can thrive,” she said.

    The Minister explained that G20 Empowerment of Women Working Group (EWWG) has committed to advancing three urgent priorities that include the care economy, financial inclusion for and of women, and gender-based violence and femicide.

    “As part of this working group, we have developed several empowerment programmes as legacy projects that we wish to partner with private sector partners beyond South Africa’s G20 Presidency.

    “To this end, we have conceptualised and designed a series of Transformative Emerging Industrialists Accelerator Programs and intend to rally all relevant stakeholders, particularly SOEs, private sector companies and industry associations behind their implementation,” the Minister said.

    These programs will target emerging women industrialists in key sectors, including energy security, the maritime, defence and aerospace industries, platform economies and agriculture, among others.

    Participating emerging industrialists will work alongside experienced industry associations, receiving support from ideation through to product development, financing, market access, and commercialisation pathways.

    “To advance disability inclusion, we have also developed an investment case for the establishment of a Disability Inclusion Nerve Centre, a legacy project of South Africa’s Chairship of the G20 Empowerment of Women Working Group.

    “This centre will serve as a cornerstone for advancing disability rights and inclusion in the region, aligning with both South Africa’s constitutional imperatives and international commitments,” the Minister said.

    The centre will focus on the following priorities:

    • Research on mainstreaming the mights of persons with disabilities, particularly in the areas of financial inclusion, care economy, artificial intelligence (AI), climate change and conducive working conditions.
    • Establishing a national disability data observatory.
    • Strengthening data collection and reporting systems across public and private sectors.
    • Developing early childhood disability screening protocols.
    • Enhancing institutional capacity through strengthened disability focal points.
    • Leveraging AI for disability inclusion.
    • Supporting special schools across South Africa to train teachers, address the digital divide, and improve educational outcomes for learners with disabilities.
    • Developing a model disability inclusive classroom and school for South Africa.

    South Africa assumed the G20 Presidency from 1 December 2024 to 30 November 2025 under the theme: “Solidarity, Equality and Sustainability”. – SAnews.gov.za

    MIL OSI Africa –

    May 20, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Africa: Let us honour our struggle icons- President Ramaphosa 

    Source: South Africa News Agency

    President Cyril Ramaphosa has, through his weekly newsletter, called on South Africans to celebrate the lives of struggle icons who fought and died for freedom.

    The President’s call comes days after the reburial of struggle icon, Advocate Duma Nokwe, who the President recently conferred the honorary title of Senior Counsel (Silk).

    In Monday’s newsletter, President Ramaphosa described the lives lost during the fight against Apartheid as a “heavy price” paid for the families that lost loved ones.

    “For the many families and communities across this country who never got the opportunity to lay their loved ones to rest or to even know how they died, the past will continue to cast a long shadow. In the interests of national reconciliation; in the interests of moving forward, we will continue with our efforts to restore dignity to all those who were denied it in life. 

    “A heavy price was paid by many for the democracy we have today. This should continue to inspire us as we work together towards a shared future,” he said.

    Following the fall of the apartheid government, South Africa established the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) described by President Ramaphosa as an attempt to “shed a light on the atrocities committed during apartheid”.

    “Even as democratic South Africa attempted to unearth what happened and to hold those accountable to account, many apartheid-era security officials either refused to appear before the TRC or did not fully disclose their actions. Others resorted to delaying tactics and obstruction to evade trial.

    “As we recently announced, I am in the process of establishing a judicial commission of inquiry to look into allegations of interference in the investigation and prosecution of apartheid-era crimes referred by TRC,” he said.

    Repatriating heroes

    During the apartheid era, several political parties faced banning orders from the racist government – forcing many activists into exile.

    Some activists – like Advocate Duma Nokwe – died while in exile with their remains still in those countries.

    READ | Adv Duma Nokwe honoured for fighting against apartheid

    President Ramaphosa assured families still waiting for the return of the remains of their loved ones that government is “steadfast in our commitment to restoring the dignity of activists who died and were buried abroad, and to our country men and women who were subjected to indignities in foreign lands.”

    “This is being done within legal frameworks such as the National Heritage Resources Act. This framework facilitated the repatriation of Sara Baartman’s remains for burial in South Africa in 2002. We have also developed a draft National Policy on the Repatriation and Restitution of Human Remains and Heritage Objects which will guide our efforts going forward. 

    “The Department of Sport, Arts and Culture and other government institutions continue to engage with several countries to facilitate the return of human remains,” he said.

    The President reflected that although dealing with “the memory of past atrocities is one of the most difficult and delicate tasks a nation can undertake,” it can be a “cathartic process”.

    “[It] is vital if a country is committed to enhance national healing, cohesion and unity. The way a country remembers its painful past can shape the character of its democracy, the legitimacy of its institutions and the resilience of its people.

    “As a country, we have had to contend with our past in the interests of social cohesion and nation-building. We have advanced policies of restitution and redress to both acknowledge and correct the historical injustice of apartheid. 

    “We remain equally committed to restoring the dignity of apartheid’s countless victims and to bringing closure to their families,” President Ramaphosa said. – SAnews.gov.za

    MIL OSI Africa –

    May 20, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Africa: Deputy President in France for a working visit

    Source: South Africa News Agency

    Deputy President Paul Mashatile has on Monday arrived in Paris, France, for a working visit aimed at reinforcing South Africa’s historic and warm bilateral relations with that country.

    During the working visit, the two countries will be expanding on existing cooperation projects as well as identify new areas of cooperation with specific focus on trade and investment.

    The Deputy President’s visit follows a recent visit by Minister of International Relations and Cooperation, Ronald Lamola, last week to co-chair the 9th Session of the Forum for Political Dialogue (FPD) where the status of bilateral political relations between the two countries was discussed, including matters of mutual interest relating to international developments. 

    “Deputy President Mashatile will participate in the SA-France Investment Conference, where South Africa will intensify cooperation in the fields of infrastructure development; science, technology and innovation; education and skills development as well as improve the already strong people-to-people links between the two countries and increase the flow of tourism to South Africa from France,” said the Presidency in a statement.

    It said France is the 14th largest investor in South Africa, with about 400 French companies investing in sectors such as Financial Services, Renewable Energy, Rail, Chemicals, Oil and Gas, to mention but a few.

    “French companies have played a pivotal role in the Presidential Investment Conference. 

    “Since the first Presidential Investment Conference hosted in 2018, French companies have committed more than R70 billion with the majority of projects either completed or being implemented. “ 

    As part of his programme, Deputy President Mashatile will pay a courtesy call on Emmanuel Macron, President of the French Republic, meet with captains of different industries and conduct site visits to the Suez Global Waste Management Company and Dassault Systèmes.

    The Deputy President is accompanied by Minister of Health Aaron Motsoaledi; Minister of Small Business Development Stella Ndabeni-Abrahams; Minister of Transport Barbara Creecy; Minister of Sports, Arts and Culture Gayton McKenzie; Minister of Tourism Patricia de Lille; Deputy Minister of International Relations and Cooperation Alvin Botes; Deputy Minister of Higher Education and Training Buti Manamela; Deputy Minister Trade, Industry and Competition Zuko Godlimpi and Deputy Minister of Electricity and Energy Samantha Graham-Maré. – SAnews.gov.za

    MIL OSI Africa –

    May 20, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Africa: Condolences for family of MP Mnganga-Gcabashe

    Source: South Africa News Agency

    Monday, May 19, 2025

    Deputy President Paul Mashatile has expressed condolences to the family of Member of Parliament, Lungi Mnganga-Gcabashe, who passed away on Saturday.

    Mnganga-Gcabashe, 64, was serving as Chairperson of the Portfolio Committee on Tourism in Parliament at the time of her passing.

    She previously served in the legislative body between 2014 and 2019 and before re-election in 2024.

    “In the past week, Honourable Mnganga-Gcabashe participated in the Africa Travel Indaba, hosted by the Department in Durban, KwaZulu-Natal. A true testament to her commitment to the country and serving South Africans. 

    “Her commitment to a non-racial, non-sexist and prosperous society has guided her path and contribution to the struggle against apartheid through the United Democratic Front, Natal Organisation of Women and during the course of our democracy in legislative structures. 

    “I would like to send my heartfelt condolences to her family, friends, and comrades. May her soul rest in peace and may the contributions she has made to the struggles for gender equality and non-racialism remain etched in the history of our country,” Deputy President Mashatile said in a statement. – SAnews.gov.za

    Share this post:

    MIL OSI Africa –

    May 20, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Africa: Withdrawal of SA soldiers in DRC proceeding according to plan

    Source: South Africa News Agency

    Monday, May 19, 2025

    The South African National Defence Force (SANDF) has assured the public that the withdrawal of the Southern African Development Community Mission in the Democratic Republic of Congo (SAMIDRC) is currently underway and proceeding according to plan.

    This comes after a media report claimed that the South African soldiers were stranded in Goma as the buses that were meant to transport the group had not arrived.

    In a statement on Sunday, the SANDF said the logistical arrangements for the withdrawal remain under the full coordination and control of the Southern African Development Community (SADC).

    “We further assure the public that all SANDF members deployed as part of this mission are safe, adequately supplied for and continue to receive their daily meals and essentials. No member is stranded or without support.

    “It is unfortunate that the City Press article published on Sunday, 18 May 2025 was released without soliciting comment from the SANDF, despite the significance and sensitivity of the matter. 

    “The SANDF appeals to members of the public and the media to exercise discernment and patience during this sensitive withdrawal phase. Inaccurate or speculative reporting may cause unnecessary concern and mislead the nation,” the SANDF said.

    The SANDF emphasised that it remains committed to transparency and will continue to provide updates as the withdrawal progresses.

    Earlier this month, Defence and Military Veterans Minister Angie Motshekga said the withdrawal of the SANDF from the eastern DRC marked a new chapter in regional peacekeeping efforts.

    READ | New chapter as SANDF withdraws from DRC

    “This withdrawal is a structured process designed to ensure safe return of both our troops and equipment. All our logistical support will continue during this phase,” the Minister said at a media briefing at the time. –SAnews.gov.za

    Share this post:

    MIL OSI Africa –

    May 20, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Africa: Financing biodiversity key for realising Africa’s economic potential

    Source: South Africa News Agency

    Deputy Minister of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment Narend Singh has called on delegates from governments across the continent to innovatively think about financing biodiversity, beyond the traditional funding from national budgets.

    According to the Deputy Minister, more than 7 000 species across the continent face extinction, which could harm Africa’s economic potential.

    “Biodiversity is not a luxury; it is the foundation of our economies, our health, and our survival. As you are aware that the financing gap to halt and reverse biodiversity loss by 2030 from all sources is estimated at 200 billion US Dollars annually. 

    “Every hectare of forest cleared, every waterway polluted, and every species lost diminishes not just our ecological wealth, but our economic potential,” Singh said on Monday in Cape Town.

    He was addressing the regional dialogue for member States of the Southern African Development Community, the East African Community and other Anglophone countries on the update or revision of national and regional biodiversity strategies and action plans (NBSAPs).

    This regional dialogue offers an opportunity for countries that have already revised their NBSAPs to share good practices, address common challenges, and identify potential solutions.

    The goal of the NBSAP is to conserve and manage biodiversity to ensure sustainable benefits to the people of South Africa, through co-operation and partnerships that build on strengths and opportunities.

    “Strong NBSAPs are more than policy, they are strategic tools to unlock international finance, attract private investment, and guide public spending where it matters most. But a plan on paper is not enough – it must be matched by budgets and political commitment,” he said.

    The Deputy Minister offered insights into the innovative finance solutions that were developed in South Africa through the Biodiversity Finance Initiative (BIOFIN) programme.

    The BIOFIN programme supports countries to enhance their financial management of biodiversity and ecosystems.

    “Through the BIOFIN programme, a framework has been developed to guide a fee setting process for biodiversity permits, which enables cost recovery and value attribution to the natural resources. 

    “The basis for this work is that revenue from sources such as protected area gate fees, tourism concessions, conferencing facilities, fees and permits related to biodiversity can play an important role in supporting the financial sustainability of the conservation estate,” he said.

    Through the programme, some municipalities have given rates relief to conservation areas leading to funds saved which can be further invested into biodiversity conservation. 

    “The financial result of this has been 124 000.00 US dollars saved by conservation areas over the last three years. We were delighted to learn from the Botswana example, where their rate collection increased seven-fold,” Singh said.

    A biodiversity offset portal will be launched on 22 May 2025 as part of celebrating the International Day of Biodiversity. 

    The offset portal which will be publicly accessible is aimed at improving the way offsets are conducted for the benefit of funding protected area management.

    “The Biodiversity Sector investment portal was launched in 2022 and formally handed over to the Government of South Africa. The portal has been institutionalized within the department and established a Biodiversity Economy Investment Portal, officially recognised as an ongoing conduit of opportunities for investment in the Small and Medium Enterprises. The department has fully taken over the portal and allocated a budget towards its ongoing maintenance,” he said. –SANews.gov.za

    MIL OSI Africa –

    May 20, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Africa: SIU to probe SITA, Bushbuckridge municipality

    Source: South Africa News Agency

    The Special Investigating Unit (SIU) is poised to launch separate investigations into the State Information Technology Agency (SITA) and Bushbuckridge Local Municipality in Mpumalanga Province.

    This after President Cyril Ramaphosa signed two proclamations authorising the corruption busting unit to probe the two entities.

    At the SITA, the SIU will investigate allegations of maladministration and corruption focusing on the procurement of a Turnkey Software Asset Management Solution and Integrated Logistics Support Services. 

    “The SIU will assess whether the procurement process adhered to National Treasury guidelines or if it was tainted by irregularities, lack of transparency, or wasteful expenditure. Additionally, the investigation will examine any unlawful or improper conduct by SITA employees, suppliers, or other entities involved in the contract.

    “The investigation period spans 13 July 2017 to 16 May 2025, including any relevant conduct before or after this timeframe,” the SIU said.

    The investigation at the Bushbuckridge Local Municipality will zero in on serious maladministration and unlawful conduct related to a street paving contract for the Lillydale Phase 1 project.

    “The SIU aims to address allegations regarding the fairness, competitiveness, transparency, equity, and cost-effectiveness of the procurement process, examining whether it has violated any applicable legislation, National Treasury guidelines, or municipal policies. Additionally, the investigation will scrutinise any instances of unauthorised, irregular, fruitless or wasteful expenditure connected to this project.

    “The investigation will also examine improper conduct by municipal officials, employees, suppliers, or service providers and determine whether such conduct resulted in financial losses for the municipality or the state.

    “The Proclamation covers conduct occurring between 1 January 2018 and 16 May 2025, as well as any related activities before or after this period that are connected to the matters under investigation,” the SIU said.

    Furthermore, evidence of criminal conduct uncovered during the investigations will be referred to the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA).

    “Beyond investigating maladministration, corruption, and fraud, the SIU is committed to identifying systemic failures and recommending measures to prevent future losses.

    “Under the SIU Act, the SIU is also authorised to initiate a civil action in the High Court or a Special Tribunal in its name to address any wrongdoing identified during its investigation resulting from acts of corruption, fraud, or maladministration,” the unit concluded. – SAnews.gov.za

    MIL OSI Africa –

    May 20, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Africa: Musician Manqoba Ntombela shot outside his Heidelberg home

    Source: South Africa News Agency

    Monday, May 19, 2025

    Founder of the iconic music group Woza Afrika, Manqoba Ntombela, has been shot dead outside his Ratanda home in Heidelberg, Gauteng.

    According to the Ratanda South African Police Service (SAPS), Ntombela was shot multiple times while sitting in his car outside his house on Friday evening.

    Ntombela, known for the hit song “Istokvela”, was also a businessman, educator and community leader. 

    At the time of his death, he was actively involved in the Mazibuye Kasi Spaza Shops initiative, empowering local business owners.

    The motive of the shooting is unknown at this stage and police are investigating the matter. 

    Police have encouraged members of the community who may have information about the murder case to contact the Ratanda police station on 016 343 7014 or 079 692 4853. – SAnews.gov.za

    Share this post:

    MIL OSI Africa –

    May 20, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Africa: Call to close financial inclusion gap for women

    Source: South Africa News Agency

    Deputy Minister of Finance, Dr David Masondo, has emphasised the importance of closing the financial inclusion gap for women and ensuring that they can leverage financial services to smooth their incomes, invest in opportunities, and protect themselves against shocks.

    “Usage remains low, and significant gaps persist, particularly for women, youth, informal workers, and rural entrepreneurs,” Masondo said on Monday in Skukuza, Mpumalanga.

    Addressing the second Plenary Meeting of the Global Partnership for Financial Inclusion, the Deputy Minister said empowering women is not just a matter of fairness or social equity; it is smart economics.

    “When women gain access to financial tools and earnings, they invest in their families and communities to an impressive degree. Studies find that women typically reinvest up to 90% of their income back into their households, compared to around 30–40% for men. 

    “We have seen that financially empowering a woman creates a ripple effect; children stay in school longer, family nutrition improves, and local economies become more resilient. Conversely, when women remain on the margins of finance, we all lose out on growth and innovation.

    “Let us remember that closing the financial inclusion gap for women is not a sidebar, it is central to our agenda. … Giving women access to and the ability to use affordable payments, credit, and insurance will boost development broadly,” he said.

    The Deputy Minister asserted that South Africa has made women’s economic empowerment a priority in the national strategies encouraging progress is being made.

    “But there is much farther to go to ensure that the creative entrepreneur I described, and millions like her can prosper. She does not want charity; she wants the playing field: levelled reliable digital payments, safe savings, and fair credit so her enterprise can grow.

    “Turning this vision into reality will require concerted action on multiple fronts: public policy, private innovation, and grassroots capacity-building. South Africa is committed to doing its part. 

    “Through our Financial Sector Development Reform Program (FSDRP), supported by partners like the World Bank and the Swiss State Secretariat for Economic Affairs, we invest in the infrastructure and reforms that move inclusion from access to usage,” Masondo said.

    The Reserve Bank has launched the Inclusive Payments Digitalisation Programme that aims to bring practical digital payment solutions to the informal sector.

    “We have piloted it in two communities, Tembisa and Hammanskraal, to develop digital ecosystems right where people live and work. Some of you visited these enterprises in March. 

    “This pilot is a testament to what is possible when we blend policy intent with on-the-ground innovation. We plan to expand such efforts, informed by data and community feedback, so that no entrepreneur is left behind by the digital finance revolution.

    “Our commitment goes further. We are streamlining regulations to encourage low-cost fintech solutions through the Intergovernmental Fintech Working Group, strengthening consumer protection to build trust in digital finance through the Conduct of Financial Institutions (COFI) Bill, and improving connectivity in rural areas through the SA Connect programme,” he said.

    In essence, efforts are being made to create an environment where using financial services is easy, affordable, and safe so that inclusion translates into actual economic participation. 

    “But South Africa cannot do it alone. The beauty of the Global Partnership for Financial Inclusion (GPFI) is that it allows us to learn from each other and to tackle common challenges together. Every country in this room has experiences, successful policies, clever tech applications, and even instructive failures that can inform the way forward for all of us,” Masondo said.

    GPFI is an inclusive platform for Group Twenty (G20) countries, non-G20 countries and relevant stakeholders for peer learning, knowledge sharing, policy advocacy and coordination. 

    It is the primary implementing mechanism of the G20 Financial Inclusion Action Plan (FIAP).

    South Africa assumed the G20 Presidency from 1 December 2024 to 30 November 2025 under the theme: “Solidarity, Equality and Sustainability”. – SAnews.gov.za

    MIL OSI Africa –

    May 20, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Africa: Akani Simbine continues with winning streak

    Source: South Africa News Agency

    South African sprinter, Akani Simbine, continued his dominance in the United States when he surged to victory in the 100m at the Atlanta City Games, stopping the clock in 9.86 seconds.

    The time won’t be recognised as the fastest of the year, given that it was wind-aided, but that won’t matter to the star South African. 

    “After winning both 100m Diamond League events this season, winning a medal at the World Indoors and anchoring Team SA to gold in the 4x100m World Relays, Simbine is unquestionably the fastest man on the planet right now,” the South African Sports Confederation and Olympic Committee (SASCOC) said on its website.

    Simbine competed in the Atlanta City Games on Saturday afternoon.

    Reacting to the victory, Simbine said: “It’s no pressure. I get to come enjoy something that is no stress; just run and have fun. I wasn’t expecting that [time] at all. Crazy.”

    He was expecting, however, the reigning Olympic champion, Noah Lyles, to be lining up alongside him, but the American scratched from the race, withdrawing due to a “tight ankle” that has impacted him in the last two weeks.

    “Simbine’s 9.90 from the Botswanan Golden Grand Prix last month remains as the official world lead for 2025, though his performance on Saturday clearly pleased him, too. He started a bit slow, but hit his stride at the 50-metre mark well ahead of Nigerian Udodi Onwuzurike, who was second with a 10.05,” SASCOC said.

    Also in action was men’s 400m world record holder, Wayde van Niekerk, who was making his seasonal debut. He placed a creditable third in the 200m in 20.03. –SAnews.gov.za

    MIL OSI Africa –

    May 20, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Africa: Central African Republic Implements the Enhanced General Data Dissemination System (e-GDDS)

    Source: Africa Press Organisation – English (2) – Report:

    WASHINGTON D.C., United States of America, May 19, 2025/APO Group/ —

    With the successful launch of the new data portal—the National Summary Data Page (NSDP) — the Central African Republic has implemented a key recommendation of the IMF’s Enhanced General Data Dissemination System (e-GDDS) to publish essential macroeconomic and financial data. The e-GDDS is the first tier of the IMF Data Standards Initiatives that promote transparency as a global public good and encourage countries to voluntarily publish timely data that is essential for monitoring and analyzing economic performance.

    The launch of the NSDP is a testament to the Central African Republic’s commitment to data transparency. It serves as a one-stop portal for disseminating various macroeconomic data compiled by multiple statistical agencies. The published data include statistics on national accounts, prices, government operations, debt, the monetary and financial sector, and the external sector.

    The launch of the NSDP was supported by an IMF technical assistance mission, financed by the Government of Japan through the Japan Administered Account for Selected Fund Activities (JSA), and conducted in collaboration with the African Development Bank (AfDB) from May 12 to 16, 2025. The mission was hosted by “Institut Centrafricain de Statistique et des Études Économiques et Sociales,” in close collaboration with the Bank of Central African States (BEAC) and the Ministry of Finance and Budget.

    With this reform, the Central African Republic will join 75 countries worldwide and 33 countries in Africa using the e-GDDS to disseminate standardized data.  

    Mr. Bert Kroese, Chief Statistician and Data Officer, and Director of the IMF’s Statistics Department, welcomed this as a major milestone in the Central African Republic’s statistical development. He went on to express that the country would benefit from the improvement in data transparency and that the IMF stood ready to “continue supporting the authorities in further developing their statistical systems.”

    MIL OSI Africa –

    May 20, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Africa: Statement by International Monetary Fund (IMF) Deputy Managing Director Bo Li at the Conclusion of a Visit to Mozambique

    Source: Africa Press Organisation – English (2) – Report:

    MAPUTO, Mozambique, May 19, 2025/APO Group/ —

    Mr. Bo Li, Deputy Managing Director of the International Monetary Fund (IMF), issued the following statement today in Mozambique at the end of his visit from May 15-17, 2025: 

    “I am pleased to be in Mozambique for my first visit as IMF Deputy Managing Director. I would like to thank President Daniel Chapo, Finance Minister Carla Loveira, and Central Bank Governor Rogerio Zandamela, as well as other senior officials, for their hospitality and constructive discussions. We discussed opportunities to strengthen our continued partnership through regular policy dialogue and technical assistance. The IMF remains a close partner in supporting the country’s efforts to lift the living standards of the Mozambican people.

    “During my visit, I also met with the Committee of Central Bank Governors of the Southern African Development Community (SADC) to advance efforts to improve cross-border payments within the regional bloc. Member countries remain committed to this joint objective and are making good progress. We also discussed opportunities to further strengthen ongoing technical assistance provided jointly by the IMF and the World Bank on cross-border payments. We look forward to continuing the tight and productive collaboration.”

    MIL OSI Africa –

    May 20, 2025
  • ←Previous Page
    1 … 203 204 205 206 207 … 464
    Next Page→
    NewzIntel.com

    NewzIntel.com

    MIL Open Source Intelligence

    • Blog
    • About
    • FAQs
    • Authors
    • Events
    • Shop
    • Patterns
    • Themes

    Twenty Twenty-Five

    Designed with WordPress