NewzIntel.com

Category: AM-NC

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Lowering of the reporting threshold for beneficiaries active in primary agricultural production to EUR 10 000 per calendar year – E-001598/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    As regards individual aid awards, the publication thresholds for beneficiaries of state aid active in the primary agricultural production were modified as part of the general revision of the transparency rules. This revision concerned state aid in all sectors.

    The fitness check preceding the revision showed that only around 20-25% of state aid awards were subject to a publication obligation under the previous transparency rules[1] (which set the publication threshold at EUR 60 000 for the primary agricultural sector).

    In certain Member States with limited state aid spending capacity, this reporting was limited to only a very small fraction of the state aid granted.

    The low proportion of individual aid awards that were published undermined the transparency objective. Hence, the threshold for publication was lowered to EUR 10 000 for the primary agricultural sector[2].

    The choice of the modalities of implementation of the transparency requirements, such as by means of a multi-page tax declaration mentioned in the question, remains at the discretion of the Member States.

    The thresholds for publishing individual aid awards were modified across sectors following the assessment of their appropriateness to achieve the relevant transparency objectives and are currently considered as fit for the purpose.

    • [1]  https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=uriserv%3AOJ.C_.2014.204.01.0001.01.ENG&toc=OJ%3AC%3A2014%3A204%3AFULL and https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2014/702/oj/eng#:~:text=ELI%3A%20http%3A%2F%2Fdata.europa.eu%2Feli%2Freg%2F2014%2F702%2Foj%20of%2025%20June%202014%20declaring%20certain,Treaty%20on%20the%20Functioning%20of%20the%20European%20Union.
    • [2]  https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2022:485:TOC and https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2022:327:TOC.
    Last updated: 17 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Briefing – Recruitment of minors into organised crime – 17-06-2025

    Source: European Parliament

    The recruitment of minors into serious and organised crime has increasingly become a tactic used by criminal networks to avoid detection, capture and prosecution. By using minors, the criminal networks increase the distance between the criminal activity and the network’s core members or leaders, hampering identification. Even though there is a lack of reliable and comparable data on this phenomenon, several EU Member States have reported an increase in the involvement of minors in serious and organised crime. While the rising demand for recreational drugs seems to be the main driver behind the increase, minors are involved in other markets too, including property crime and online fraud. Criminal networks exploit children as young as 12 years for low-skilled roles such as local street dealers, cash couriers, warehouse operators and extractors of drugs from shipping containers. Easier access to firearms has led to a shift from minor crime to more serious, especially violent, crime, such as extortion and killings. Many minors are lured into organised crime by the promise of financial gain, social status, or sense of belonging, whilst others may be coerced or forced into this lifestyle due to their circumstances or environment. The consequences of such involvement are far-reaching, affecting not only the minors involved, but also the communities and society as a whole. The processes for recruiting minors into organised crime are still poorly understood, but there is a clear trend of increased use of digital tools for recruitment and communication, such as encrypted messaging services, apps and video games that are popular with young people. The EU recognises the severity of the problem and the need for closer cooperation between the affected Member States and for an integrated preventive response. By facilitating the exchange of best practices amongst Member States, integrating the local dimension into efforts to counter the infiltration of criminal networks into the economy and society, and by adopting a comprehensive and multi-faceted approach, the EU contributes to preventing the recruitment of minors into organised crime and to mitigating the devastating consequences.

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – EU billions for Ahmed al-Sharaa, a.k.a. Abu Mohammad al-Julani – E-001182/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    On 11 March 2025, gravely alarmed by the violence in Syria’s coastal region, the High Representative/Vice-President issued a statement[1] strongly condemning the horrific crimes committed against civilians.

    The EU called for a swift, transparent and impartial investigation to ensure that perpetrators are brought to justice. It welcomed the transitional authorities’ establishment of an independent investigative committee and called on them to allow the Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Syrian Arab Republic to investigate all violations.

    The EU remains attentive to the actions of the new authorities in ensuring the protection of all Syrians without any kind of discrimination.

    The EU continues to call for an end to violence across Syria and urges involved parties to protect all Syrians. The EU supports a peaceful and inclusive Syrian-led and Syrian-owned political transition, upholding the universality and indivisibility of human rights and principles of equality and non-discrimination among all components of society .

    The EU Brussels Conference pledges ensure support to Syria and neighbouring countries, that host a considerable number of refugees.

    The EU’s non-humanitarian assistance is subjected to extensive monitoring/evaluation mechanisms, including third party monitoring and risk assessments.

    The EU’s approach is gradual and commensurate with steps taken by the transitional government. The EU’s assistance follows strict implementation parameters. It aims to foster social cohesion by bringing together all Syrians without discrimination.

    The EU’s humanitarian aid is delivered through trusted partners in all parts of Syria . It seeks to respond to life-saving emergencies based on needs, accountability to affected populations, transparency, efficiency, effectiveness , and humanitarian principles (humanity, impartiality, neutrality, independence) [2].

    • [1] https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2025/03/11/syria-statement-by-the-high-representative-on-behalf-of-the-european-union-on-the-recent-wave-of-violence/.
    • [2] EU Treaties and the European Consensus on Humanitarian Aid, see Joint Statement by the Council and the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States meeting within the Council, the European Parliament and the European Commission, OJ C 25, 30.1.2008, p. 1-12, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A42008X0130%2801%29.

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Turkish military ‘Sea Wolf’ exercise threatens peace and stability in the Eastern Mediterranean – E-001912/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The EU has repeatedly expressed its expectation by Türkiye to de-escalate tensions in the interest of regional stability in the Eastern Mediterranean[1].

    In particular, the Commission has underlined in the 2024 report on Türkiye[2] that, as stemming from obligations under the Negotiating Framework, Türkiye is expected to make an unequivocal commitment to good neighbourly relations, international agreements and the peaceful settlement of disputes including through the International Court of Justice.

    Türkiye must avoid threats and actions that damage good neighbourly relations and respect the sovereignty of all Member States over their territorial sea and airspace as well as all their sovereign rights, in accordance with the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea.

    This is essential to ensure a stable and secure environment in the Eastern Mediterranean and the development of a cooperative and mutually beneficial relationship between the EU and Türkiye[3].

    The EU continues to stress that Türkiye should commit and actively contribute to normalising its relations with the Republic of Cyprus[4].

    • [1] https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/57442/2022-06-2324-euco-conclusions-en.pdf.
    • [2] https://enlargement.ec.europa.eu/document/download/8010c4db-6ef8-4c85-aa06-814408921c89_en?filename=T%C3%BCrkiye%20Report%202024.pdf.
    • [3] https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_23_6157.
    • [4] https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-16983-2024-INIT/en/pdf.
    Last updated: 17 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Next steps and policy outlook for EU-SADC (Southern African Development Community) Economic Partnership Agreement – E-001583/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The EU-Southern African Development Community (SADC) Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA) has been provisionally applied since 2016.

    A comprehensive external ex-post evaluation of the EPA was published in September 2024[1]. It shows that the EPA has delivered on its main aim to increase trade in goods between both sides, with an overall increase since 2016 of 24% (31% for SADC exports and 18% for EU exports).

    It has also helped to diversify SADC exports as particularly visible in the South African automotive sector. The Commission will publish a staff working document this year to follow-up on the ex-post evaluation study.

    The ex-post evaluation study is also used as input for the EPA review that is provided for in Article 116 of the EPA[2]. In the course of the review, both sides are assessing to what extent the implementation of the EPA can be further complemented or improved. Based on the current state of play, the Commission does not expect any reopening of the agreement or any addition of new trade areas.

    The Commission aims at concluding the review by the next EU-SADC Joint Council (at political level) that will be prepared beforehand by the EU-SADC Trade and Development Committee (at senior official level; both meetings are envisaged to take place in 2026 at a date still to be determined).

    • [1] https://policy.trade.ec.europa.eu/analysis-and-assessment/ex-post-evaluations_en.
    • [2] Art. 116: (1) The Parties agree to review this Agreement in its entirety no later than five (5) years after its entry into force. Such review is without prejudice to instances of adjustments, reviews or revisions otherwise provided for in this Agreement, such as those contemplated under Articles 12(2), 16(8), 17(5), 18(5), 26(10), 33(3), 35(6) and 65(e). (2) As regards the implementation of this Agreement, either Party may make suggestions oriented towards adjusting trade-related cooperation, taking into account the experience acquired during the implementation thereof. (3) The Parties agree that this Agreement may need to be reviewed in light of further developments in international economic relations and in the light of the expiration of the Cotonou Agreement; https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:22016A0916(01).
    Last updated: 17 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Shortening timelines for anti-dumping proceedings – P-001968/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    Before taking action against unfairly traded imports (i.e. dumped of subsidised), the Commission must first establish that these practices are taking place and that they are causing harm to the EU industry. This requires investigations which are complex and subject to a strict legal framework.

    In 2018, as part of the modernisation of the trade defence instruments, the length of anti-dumping investigations was shortened by one month.

    Since then, provisional measures are imposed eight, and in some cases seven months after initiation. Also, in October 2024, the Commission decided to register imports in all ongoing new investigations to facilitate the retroactive application of measures, i.e. before the date of provisional measures, if the legal conditions allow[1].

    As regards citric acid, there are anti-dumping measures in place on imports of the product from China ranging between 16.3% and 42.7% since 2008.

    These measures were most recently extended for a further five years, in April 2021, following an expiry review[2]. These measures reflect the levels of dumping found in the context of an investigation conducted in line with World Trade Organisation and EU legislation.

    Measures in place may be reviewed on request by interested parties where there are changed circumstances of a lasting nature. The Commission conducts such reviews where it receives evidence from the European industry that action is warranted and will assist any industry in using the instruments.

    • [1] https://policy.trade.ec.europa.eu/news/commission-register-imports-all-products-under-trade-defence-investigations-bid-fight-unfair-2024-09-24_en.
    • [2] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32021R0607&from=EN.
    Last updated: 17 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Public procurement irregularities in Spain and favourable treatment – E-001206/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    Directive 2000/78/EC[1] aims to combat discrimination based on religion or belief, disability, age or sexual orientation in the context of employment and occupation.

    Article 61 of the EU Financial Regulation[2] concerns persons involved in EU budget implementation. As the situation described by the Honourable Member does not seem to concern issues of discrimination or the implementation of the EU budget, Directive 2000/78/EC and Article 61 of the EU Financial Regulation have no relevance in this context.

    The Commission is not competent to intervene in individual cases , if they do not concern a possible breach of EU law . Employment matters unrelated to rules of EU law fall within the remit of the national authorities and courts.

    In addition, o utside the implementation of EU law, it is for Member States to ensure compliance with fundamental rights in accordance with their constitutional order and their obligations under international law.

    • [1] OJ L 303, 2.12.2000, p. 16-22.
    • [2] OJ L, 2024/2509, 26.9.2024.
    Last updated: 17 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Israeli legislation on registration and visa issuance for international NGOs – E-001532/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    On 24 February 2025, during the 13th meeting of the EU-Israel Association Council, the High Representative/Vice-President (HR/VP) and the Commissioner for the Mediterranean expressed the EU’s concerns in relation to the Israeli legislation on registration and visa issuance for international non-governmental organisations (NGO) as well as with the bill aiming to introduce financial and operational restrictions for internationally funded NGOs.

    In particular, the ‘risk of restrictions for foreign-funded NGOs, limiting civil society and its democratic participation and activity’ was highlighted in the EU statement[1].

    Similar concerns continue to be shared with Israel authorities at different levels of representation, both in Brussels and in Israel. The EU is closely following the matter, including through regular contact with international NGOs.

    In its relations with Israel, the EU considers that political engagement and frank and open dialogue are the most effective ways to convey EU concerns.

    The Association Agreement with Israel[2] is the legal basis of the EU’s ongoing dialogue with the Israeli authorities and it provides mechanisms to discuss issues and advance the EU’s point of view. In this framework, the EU will continue to reaffirm its commitment to the applicability of international human rights and humanitarian law in the occupied Palestinian territory.

    The EU keeps under constant review all agreements with third countries, and the principles and values upon which they are based. The possibility of a review of Israel’s compliance with Article 2 of the Association Agreement has been discussed at the Foreign Affairs Council on 20 May 2025.

    Based on this discussion, the HR/VP has announced that such a review will be undertaken.

    • [1] https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-6511-2025-INIT/en/pdf.
    • [2] https://eeas.europa.eu/archives/delegations/israel/documents/eu_israel/asso_agree_en.pdf.
    Last updated: 17 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Transparency of EU funding to NGOs and links to political activities and irregular immigration – P-001458/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Commission refers to its replies to the European Court of Auditors’ Special Report 11/2025[1].

    A definition of a non-governmental organisation (NGO) has been recently included in the Financial Regulation (FR),[2] together with the need to indicate in a direct management grant application whether the entity is an NGO.

    The Commission will explore whether this recent definition of an NGO should and could be further clarified. Such clarification should not increase administrative burden for NGOs, be proportionate and not limit access to EU funds.

    There is no indication that the NGO status poses a higher risk for the EU budget, compared to other types of entities. The NGO status is generally not a prerequisite for receiving EU funding.

    The Commission will explore increasing the frequency of updates in the Financial Transparency System[3]. In accordance with Article 38 FR, the Commission will make available on a centralised website information on recipients of EU funds under all management modes as for post 2027 programmes.

    The Commission’s current data mining and risk-scoring tool ‘Arachne’ serves control and audit, and not to verify respect of EU values.

    The FR provides for further development of this IT tool only as regards control and audit functions[4]. The Commission is open to exploring the feasibility of introducing further risk indicators to enhance checks on compliance with EU values, provided this is technically possible and in line with the applicable rules.

    Any such assessment could be carried out only following the further development of Arachne, which is to be delivered by the end of 2027.

    Interest representatives that apply for EU funding, which would typically include NGOs, must register in the Transparency Register[5] and declare their main sources of funding, the amount of each contribution above EUR 10 000 exceeding 10% of their total budget and the name of the contributor.

    • [1] https://www.eca.europa.eu/en/publications?ref=SR-2025-11.
    • [2] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=OJ:L_202402509.
    • [3] https://ec.europa.eu/budget/financial-transparency-system/index.html; the annual publications are based on Article 38 of the Financial Regulation (OJ L 2024/2509, 26.9.2024, p. 1-239), and in accordance with the third paragraph of the article, information on recipients is not disclosed in specific cases outlined therein.
    • [4] See recitals 29-32 and Article 36 of the FR. See also the Joint statement of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on the single data mining and risk-scoring tool provided for in Article 36 of the Financial Regulation on the occasion of the adoption of Regulation 2024/2509, OJ C, C/2024/5767, 26.9.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5767/oj.
    • [5] https://transparency-register.europa.eu/index_en.

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – ETS maritime surcharges – E-001705/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    All sectors, including maritime transport, need to contribute to the EU climate neutrality goal by 2050 and the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) is a key policy to achieve this objective.

    While the ETS Directive[1] allows for the transfer of the ETS costs from the shipping company to another entity operating the ship, it does not regulate the pass-through of costs to shippers.

    The Commission’s report[2] on the monitoring of the ETS extension to maritime transport shows that shipping companies typically pass ETS costs to shippers, with a limited impact on overall transport prices in 2024, estimated between 1% and 5% for deep sea container services.

    A case study revealed that surcharges do not always reflect the EU ETS costs expected on specific routes, possibly due to shipping companies’ strategies in redistributing costs among their lines.

    Information to be published by 30 June 2025 in Thetis Monitoring, Reporting and Verification (MRV)[3] will detail ship level emissions reported by shipping companies under the ETS, possibly aiding shippers in their commercial discussions.

    In terms of effectiveness, companies passing on the ETS costs would generally incentivise their consumers to shift towards greener alternatives.

    At the same time, the ETS would continue incentivising investments in mitigation reduction solutions in synergy with other policies such as FuelEU Maritime[4].

    The Commission will continue closely monitoring the implementation of the ETS extension to maritime transport, with reports due every two years.

    The above-mentioned report should therefore be seen as the first step of an ongoing process providing the foundation for future analysis and for possible enhancements of the monitoring approach.

    • [1] Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC (OJ L 275, 25.10.2003, p. 32).
    • [2] COM(2025) 110 final — https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:52025DC0110.
    • [3] The dedicated Union information system developed and operated by the European Maritime Safety Agency that supports the implementation of Regulation (EU) 2015/757 — https://mrv.emsa.europa.eu/.
    • [4] Regulation (EU) 2023/1805 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 September 2023 on the use of renewable and low-carbon fuels in maritime transport, and amending Directive 2009/16/EC.

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Mobility poverty in the EU’s outermost regions – E-001290/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Commission announced, in the Mid-term Review Communication[1], the launch of consultations for an updated strategy for the outermost regions to address their permanent constraints. Several EU instruments already include favourable conditions for their transport needs.

    The European Regional Development Fund[2] supports airport infrastructure only in these regions and compensates for airports’ higher operating costs.

    The Connecting Europe Facility[3] supports transport infrastructure with higher co-financing rates. Several Public Service Obligations ensure connectivity with outermost regions[4], and social aid schemes support air transport for their residents[5].

    Outermost regions benefit from specific provisions under transport-related climate legislation. Domestic flights and sea journeys between an outermost region and its Member State are exempted from the Emissions Trading System[6] until end 2030 and can be exempted under the FuelEU Maritime Regulation[7] until end 2029.

    Around EUR 1.6 billion was set aside from the Emissions Trading System revenues to cover price difference between the use of eligible sustainable aviation fuels and fossil kerosene, covering exceptionally the full difference at outermost regions’ airports.

    The Social Climate Fund regulation[8] requires that relevant Member States consider outermost regions’ specificities in their national plans.

    As set out in the communication COM(2025) 46 final The road to the next multiannual financial framework[9], the future budget will include a strengthened, modernised cohesion and growth policy, in partnership with national, regional and local authorities, including outermost regions.

    • [1] A modernised cohesion policy: the mid-term review, COM(2025) 163 final.
    • [2] Regulation (EU) 2021/1058 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 June 2021 on the European Regional Development Fund and on the Cohesion Fund. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A02021R1058-20241224 .
    • [3] Regulation (EU) 2021/1153 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 July 2021 establishing the Connecting Europe Facility. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A02021R1153-20240718.
    • [4] Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 September 2008 on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A02008R1008-20201218.
    • [5] Based on Article 107(2)(a) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
    • [6] Directive (EU) 2023/959 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 May 2023 amending Directive 2003/87/EC establishing a system for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the European Union and Decision (EU) 2015/1814 concerning the establishment and operation of a market stability reserve for the European Union greenhouse gas emission trading system. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A02023L0959-20230516.
    • [7] Article 2(4) of Regulation (EU) 2023/1805 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 September 2023 on the use of renewable and low-carbon fuels in maritime transport, and amending Directive 2009/16/EC.
    • [8] Regulation (EU) 2023/955 establishing a Social Climate Fund and amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1060. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A02023R0955-20240630.
    • [9] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:52025DC0046.
    Last updated: 17 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Non-recognition of academic qualifications awarded to students of the Italian subsidiary (Enna) of Romania’s ‘Dunărea de Jos’ University of Galaţi – E-001153/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    Under the intergovernmental Bologna process, the common agreement is that i f a Romanian university’s branch in Italy offers a programme accredited in full compliance with the Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area (ESG)[1] by the Romanian quality assurance system, it would provide the necessary evidence for trust, which is the basis for recognition by other European Higher Education Area (EHEA) countries.

    However, this remains a non-binding commitment, meaning there is no legal barrier preventing Italy from establishing its own accreditation procedures.

    In the Rome Ministerial Communiqu é[2], part of the Bologna process, ministers reaffirmed their commitment to ensuring that external quality assurance arrangements, when conducted in accordance with the ESG , apply equally to transnational higher education within the EHEA as they do to domestic provision. However, this political commitment does not translate into a legal obligation.

    Directive 2005/36/EC[3] applies only when the purpose of recognition is for professional reasons, which does not correspond to the situation described. Accreditation procedures are not addressed in this context.

    In the case of recognition for further study, there is no legally binding instrument at EU level. The non-binding Council Recommendation of 2018[4] states that higher education qualification acquired in one country should be automatically recognised at the same level in another one .

    Regarding the Lisbon Recognition Convention of the Council of Europe and Unesco[5], the EU did not accede to this Convention and is not in a position to interpret its provisions. Relevant information can be provided by National Academic Recognition Centres (NARICs).

    • [1] Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area, https://www.enqa.eu/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/ESG_2015.pdf.
    • [2] https://ehea.info/Upload/Rome_Ministerial_Communique.pdf.
    • [3] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2005/36/oj/eng .
    • [4] Council Recommendation of 26 November 2018 on promoting automatic mutual recognition of higher education and upper secondary education and training qualifications and the outcomes of learning periods abroad, OJ C 444, 10.12.2018, p. 1, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=oj:JOC_2018_444_R_0001.
    • [5] United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation https://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list?module=treaty-detail&treatynum=165.
    Last updated: 17 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Possible withdrawal from the World Health Organization – E-000607/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    1. The EU and its Member States are the largest contributors to global health financing, including through contributions to the World Health Organisation (WHO), with whom the EU collaborates in line with its commitments and available resources.

    2. The negotiations on the WHO Pandemic Agreement were successfully concluded by the Intergovernmental Negotiating Body on 16 April 2025 and the text has been formally adopted at the 78th World Health Assembly on 20 May 2025. The Assembly has set out the arrangements for finalising the work on the annex on Pathogen Access and Benefit Sharing, and for the eventual opening for signature of the Agreement. Throughout the negotiations, the Commission, acting as the Union Negotiator pursuant to Council Decision (EU) 2022/451[1], has cooperated closely with Member States.

    3. Cooperation between EU and the United States of America (USA) agencies on health is ongoing, including between the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the USA Food and Drug Administration (FDA), as well as between the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) and the USA Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Such cooperation contributes to improving the health of both EU and USA citizens.

    • [1] The Commission negotiates the Pandemic Agreement on behalf of the European Union, for matters falling within Union competence, based on an authorisation from the Council of the European Union set out in Council Decision (EU) 2022/451 of 3 March 2022 authorising the opening of negotiations on behalf of the European Union for an international agreement on pandemic prevention, preparedness and response, as well as complementary amendments to the International Health Regulations (2005) (OJ L 92, 21.3.2022, p. 1). The Commission, as the Union negotiator, is guided by the negotiating directives annexed to the decision, laying down the main objectives and principles to be achieved.
    Last updated: 17 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Adoption of targeted sanctions against military individuals responsible for lethal attacks on civilians and other serious human rights violations in Sudan – E-001817/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The EU and its Member States are actively engaging with regional and international stakeholders to support efforts towards a political resolution of the conflict in Sudan.

    Accountability for serious violations is an essential part of this effort. Besides supporting monitoring and documentation efforts by civil society, the EU has adopted sanctions in response to the continuation of the conflict, in coordination with international partners, to send a clear message that impunity will not be tolerated.

    Since the beginning of the conflict, the EU has adopted three packages of restrictive measures[1] targeting entities and individuals from the Rapid Support Forces and the Sudanese Armed Forces responsible for undermining the stability and political transition in Sudan.

    The EU has also adopted sanctions to address grave human rights abuses in Sudan.

    The EU is continuously monitoring the situation to assess the best possible course of action, using all the instruments of the EU foreign policy toolbox.

    Via the Office of its Special Representative for the Horn of Africa, the EU has been able to engage directly with all stakeholders and pass critical messages of de-escalation.

    The decision to adopt restrictive measures lies ultimately with the Council, which adopts sanctions by unanimity of its members. The European External Action Service continues to consult closely with Member States to ensure that EU action remains coherent, impactful, and aligned with the EU’s values and strategic objectives in the region.

    • [1] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dec/2023/2135/2024-06-24.
    Last updated: 17 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Judgment against Greece for failure to fulfil Maritime Spatial Planning obligations – E-001301/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    1. Greece has taken steps towards ensuring compliance, i.e. towards finalising, adopting and communicating to the Commission its maritime spatial plan, but these are still to be finalised. The Commission is currently in a dialogue with Greece to support and ensure compliance with the judgment.

    2. Pursuant to Article 260(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Greece is required to take the necessary measures to comply with the above-mentioned Court judgment. Concretely, Greece is required to establish its maritime spatial plan and to send copies of that plan to the Commission and any other Member States concerned. The Commission will continue to closely monitor the situation.

    Last updated: 17 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: EIB conditionally non-excludes China Road and Bridge Corporation for 18 months to address Prohibited Conduct

    Source: European Investment Bank

    China Road and Bridge Corporation (CRBC) has received an 18-month conditional nonexclusion from EIB-financed projects due to historical misconduct by CRBC as a tenderer in the procurement procedure for multiple EIB-financed projects across several countries.

    The conditional non-exclusion was reached through a negotiated settlement agreement.

    CRBC undertakes to enforce the level of standards applicable to its compliance programme and to report on material developments in its compliance programme for a period of eighteen months, starting from [date of signature]. During the same period, CRBC also agrees to closely cooperate with the EIB, and assist it in its efforts to investigate prohibited conduct in EIBfinanced projects.

    CRBC remains eligible to participate in EIB-financed operations and activities, and to participate in EIB-financed tenders and to be awarded EIB-financed contracts, provided that CRBC complies with the terms of the settlement agreement.

    During the investigation process, CRBC cooperated in full with the EIB, helped clarify matters, and provided information and material related to the wrongdoing addressed in full transparency. CRBC also took all necessary steps to implement several measures for the enhancement of its corporate governance and compliance system to ensure such misconduct is not repeated

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: EIB excludes Sieyuan Electric Co., Ltd. for 12 months to address and combat fraudulent practice

    Source: European Investment Bank

    The Chinese company Sieyuan Electric Co., Ltd. (Sieyuan) has received a 12-month exclusion from EIB-financed projects due to its historical misconduct in connection with an EIB-financed project in Tanzania. The exclusion was reached through a negotiated settlement agreement.

    As part of this settlement, Sieyuan will be excluded from participation in EIB projects for a period of 12 months. Sieyuan will closely cooperate with the EIB, assist it in its efforts to investigate prohibited conduct in EIB-financed projects, and maintain its corporate governance and compliance system to ensure that such misconduct is not repeated.

    During the investigation process, Sieyuan cooperated in full with the EIB and helped clarify matters and provided information and material related to the wrongdoing addressed in full transparency.

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Press release – European Parliament backs extension of EU-Ukraine road transport agreement

    Source: European Parliament

    MEPs have agreed to update the EU-Ukraine road transport agreement and extend it until the end of 2025, to continue facilitating the movement of goods in and out of the country.

    As Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine continues and further disrupts Ukraine’s transport sector, the European Parliament has backed an 18-month prolongation of the EU‑Ukraine deal on the carriage of freight by road, by 488 votes to 137 and with 34 abstentions.

    Concluded in June 2022, the agreement has facilitated the transport of vital goods such as fuel and humanitarian aid into Ukraine, and enabled Ukrainian exports such as grain, ore, and steel to reach the EU and beyond. Set to expire in June 2024, its application continued provisionally pending formal backing by MEPs and the EU Council of its extension until the end of 2025.

    In order to address a number of implementation challenges, the updated agreement requires drivers to carry documents authorising international carriage. They also have to display a windscreen sticker proving that their road transport operation falls within the agreement’s scope. A safeguard clause allows the agreement’s suspension in a specific geographical area in the event of a major disturbance to the local road transport market.

    Now that Parliament has given its consent, the EU-Ukraine road transport agreement will be forwarded to the EU Council for a final adoption.

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Press release – Fight against child sexual abuse: updated rules to address new technologies

    Source: European Parliament

    On Tuesday, Parliament adopted its position on draft legislation to improve EU countries’ capacity to fight child sexual abuse effectively.

    MEPs backed an update to EU-wide definitions of the crimes linked to child sexual abuse (CSA) and exploitation. The proposal is designed to adapt legislation to new technologies, for example artificial but realistic-looking deepfake CSA material, and ensure that abuse and solicitation can be prosecuted regardless of whether they occurred online or in the real world.


    Stiffer punishments and no limitation periods

    In their amendments, MEPs propose to raise the maximum punishments for a number of CSA offences, including for sexual activities with children above the age of sexual consent who do not consent. Other examples are recruiting children for exploitation in prostitution, possessing or distributing CSA material, and offering remuneration for certain CSA crimes.

    MEPs also want to abolish limitation periods for crimes covered by the updated law, since statistics show that the majority of victims only speak up long after the offence occurred. Victims should also be able to seek compensation indefinitely.


    New technological crimes

    To bring EU laws up to date with technological developments, MEPs want to criminalise explicitly the use of artificial intelligence systems “designed or adapted primarily” for CSA crimes. They have also endorsed provisions on the livestreaming of CSA, and dissemination online of related material.

    To make investigations more effective, MEPs are pushing for the possibility to conduct undercover investigations and employ covert surveillance methods.


    Definition of consent and exemption for peers

    MEPs want a new definition of consent specifically for children over the age of sexual consent. Consent-based interactions between peers should not be criminalised unless there is dependency or an abuse of trust. Pretending to be a peer should, however, be a punishable aggravating circumstance.


    Victim support

    Child victim support should be free of charge and include medical and forensic examinations, help with documenting evidence, gender-sensitive medical care and access to sexual and reproductive healthcare. MEPs want this to be in line with the Barnahus model, where services come together under one roof to support child victims.

    Third parties, such as civil society organisations, should also be able to report crimes.


    Quote

    Rapporteur Jeroen Lenaers (EPP, Netherlands) said: “The law we voted for today is ambitious, but we can never be ambitious enough when it comes to protecting children. We are criminalising child sexual abuse manuals, and lifelike AI material will be treated the same as real material. We also need to abolish the statutes of limitations for child sexual abuse crimes, because there can be no deadline on justice.”


    Next steps

    The EP position was adopted with 599 votes in favour, 2 against and 62 abstentions. Negotiations between Parliament and Council on the final form of the law are scheduled to begin on 23 June.


    Background

    The recast directive on sexual abuse and sexual exploitation of children, child sexual abuse material, and solicitation of children will harmonise EU countries’ definitions of and punishments for these crimes, covering both online and offline activity.

    A separate proposal for a regulation on child sexual abuse material online is also being discussed by lawmakers. The European Parliament adopted its position on the draft regulation in 2023 and is waiting for the Council to reach a common position.

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Cultural and gastronomic identity of the Greek islands – E-001724/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    1. The Commission values Geographical Indications (GIs) as a tool preserving the rich and diverse culinary heritage of the Union and contributing to sustainable agriculture, landscape and biodiversity preservation, job creation and economic viability in production regions. More than 280 Greek GIs are already registered in the Union. The latest review of the Union GI rules[1] enhances the protection of GIs and the position of GI producers in the markets. Also, a toolkit to guide interested producers on how to apply is being prepared.

    2. The Culture strand of the Creative Europe program[2] focuses on initiatives promoting artistic and cultural cooperation. This can include projects related to gastronomy and culinary practices, recognised as part of Europe’s intangible cultural heritage[3]. Projects aimed at preserving, promoting, or innovating within the gastronomic culture can be aligned with the goals of the Creative Europe program. The gastronomic heritage of the Greek islands could also potentially be showcased through a transnational European Heritage Label application, in collaboration with islands that share similar culinary traditions. Relevant Greek authorities may be contacted for guidance on initiating such a proposal.

    3. The Commission supports the promotion of agricultural products[4], including those not protected under a quality scheme such as GIs. Promotion measures aim to highlight the specific characteristics of EU agricultural and food products, including authenticity, diversity or traditions. Many Greek programmes are funded under this policy[5]. The programme for the smaller Aegean islands[6] supports the production of several PDO and PGI products, such as wines, cheeses, mastic and ‘Tomataki Santorinis’.

    • [1] Regulation (EU) 2024/1143 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
    • [2] https://culture.ec.europa.eu/creative-europe/creative-europe-culture-strand.
    • [3] https://multimediark.slowfood.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/1_Policy_Brief.pdf.
    • [4] Regulation (EU) No 1144/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
    • [5] For info on programmes and funding: https://enjoy-its-from-europe.campaign.europa.eu/en.
    • [6] https://agriculture.ec.europa.eu/common-agricultural-policy/market-measures/outermost-regions-and-small-aegean-islands/smaller-aegean-islands_en.
    Last updated: 17 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Nuclear energy in the European Union – E-000320/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Commission acknowledges the role of nuclear energy in contributing to energy security and decarbonisation. All zero and low carbon energy solutions are needed to decarbonise the energy system[1].

    Projections show that decarbonised sources will generate over 90% of electricity in the EU in 2040[2], primarily from renewables complemented by nuclear energy.

    The choice of the energy sources in the energy mix, including the decision to use or not use nuclear energy, remains within the remit of each Member State in accordance with the provisions of the EU Treaties[3]. The Commission does not intervene in such decisions.

    The EU and the European Atomic Energy Community (Euratom) legal frameworks do not empower the Commission to make any recommendations towards the decommissioning of nuclear power plants. The EU supports and co-finances nuclear decommissioning programmes in Bulgaria, Lithuania and Slovakia.

    • [1] Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: ‘Securing Europe’s 2040 climate target and path to climate neutrality by 2050 building a sustainable, just and prosperous society’ (https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=COM%3A2024%3A63%3AFIN).
    • [2] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=COM%3A2024%3A63%3AFIN.
    • [3] Article 194 of the Treaty on Functioning of the European Union (TFEU).
    Last updated: 17 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Highlights – Workshop on “Tax barriers and cross-border workers” – Subcommittee on Tax Matters

    Source: European Parliament

    On Wednesday, 25 June 2025, the Policy Department for Economy and Growth organises a workshop with FISC Members to present a study on “Tax barriers and cross-border workers: tackling the fragmentation of the EU tax framework”.

    This study provides a mapping of the existing financial sector taxes applied in EU Member States and summarises the empirical evidence on the various effects associated with individual financial sector taxes.

    It focuses on the taxation of financial transactions, bank taxes, and the taxation of financial services. Financial sector taxes are assessed in terms of their effect on fragmentation and the coherence of the EU financial sector. The study also sketches some directions for reform to improve coherence of financial sector taxation.

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Easter SOS for Greek sheep and goat farming – E-001630/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 1337/2013[1] introduced the compulsory indication of the country of origin or place of provenance for swine, poultry, sheep and goat meat from 1 April 2015.

    Member States have the primary responsibility to monitor the application of the relevant legal provisions, ensuring compliance with EU law.

    The Commission evaluated[2] rules on meat origin labelling in 2021 and concluded that existing traceability systems in conjunction with legislation on identification and registration of livestock provide all the information needed for operators to correctly label meat origin.

    Competent authorities reported no systematic difficulties or problems in implementing the regulation or verifying origin labelling requirements.

    According to Regulation (EU) 2017/625[3] the competent authorities of Member States must perform official controls on animals and goods, which includes the inspection of traceability and labelling related to information of consumers. These controls must be performed on a risk basis with appropriate frequency.

    EU agriculture is market oriented, and demand driven. Farmers’ production decisions respond to consumer preferences and market opportunities.

    Member States can support the sector in their Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) Strategic Plans, including Coupled Income Support for sheep and goats or specific sectorial interventions.

    CAP support is also available for farmers applying sustainable production methods, and the common market Organisation offers tools for strengthening farmers’ position in the food supply chain.

    • [1] Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1337/2013 of 13 December 2013 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the indication of the country of origin or place of provenance for fresh, chilled and frozen meat of swine, sheep, goats and poultry, OJ L 335, 14.12.2013, p. 19-22 ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg_impl/2013/1337/oj.
    • [2] REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL evaluating the mandatory indication of the country of origin or place of provenance for meat of swine, poultry, sheep and goat. COM/2021/462 final. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52021DC0462.
    • [3] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2017/625/oj/eng.
    Last updated: 17 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Commission welcomes political agreement on a stronger and more flexible visa suspension mechanism

    Source: European Commission

    European Commission Press release Brussels, 17 Jun 2025 The European Commission welcomes the provisional political agreement reached today between the European Parliament and the Council on the revision of the visa suspension mechanism, proposed by the Commission in October 2023. The revised rules are a further step in effectively deterring and addressing situations of abuse of visa-free travel.

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Highlights – The European Defence Union: Tax Matters – Subcommittee on Tax Matters

    Source: European Parliament

    On 25 June 2025, from 14:30 to 16:15, the FISC Subcommittee will host a joint public hearing with the SEDE Committee on “The European Defence Union: Tax Matters”. The hearing will focus on the legislative framework governing VAT exemptions for defence-related activities carried out under the EU’s Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP).

    It will examine the 2015 Council Decision granting VAT exemptions to NATO and EU agencies for defence efforts supporting the implementation of Union activities, and assess how effectively Member States are applying these provisions.

    In particular, the discussion will explore the cooperation mechanisms between the European Commission, national Ministries of Finance, and Ministries of Defence in ensuring consistent and compliant implementation of the VAT exemptions. The panel will also address the operational and administrative challenges encountered in the field. The insights gathered will contribute to the broader debate on strengthening the fiscal framework underpinning European defence initiatives, including the European Defence Industry Programme (EDIP) and upcoming measures under the ReArm Europe Plan and Readiness 2030 strategy.

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Workshops – Tax barriers and cross-border workers – 25-06-2025 – Subcommittee on Tax Matters

    Source: European Parliament

    On Wednesday, 25 June 2025, the Policy Department for Economy and Growth organises a workshop with FISC Members to present a study on “Tax barriers and cross-border workers: tackling the fragmentation of the EU tax framework”.

    This study provides a mapping of the existing financial sector taxes applied in EU Member States and summarises the empirical evidence on the various effects associated with individual financial sector taxes.

    It focuses on the taxation of financial transactions, bank taxes, and the taxation of financial services. Financial sector taxes are assessed in terms of their effect on fragmentation and the coherence of the EU financial sector. The study also sketches some directions for reform to improve coherence of financial sector taxation.

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Latest news – Meeting of 19 June 2025 – Delegation for relations with the People’s Republic of China

    Source: European Parliament

    An ordinary meeting of the Delegation for relations with the People’s Republic of China (D-CN) is foreseen to take place on Thursday 19 June 2025 at 10.00-11:30 in Strasbourg.

    As main topic on the draft agenda there will be the following two Items:

    • Nomination of the representative of the Gender Mainstreaming Network
    • Discussion on the relations between D-CN and PRC after lifting of sanctions

    This meeting will be held in camera.

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Latest news – Meeting of 19 June 2025 – Delegation for relations with the People’s Republic of China

    Source: European Parliament

    An ordinary meeting of the Delegation for relations with the People’s Republic of China (D-CN) is foreseen to take place on Thursday 19 June 2025 at 10.00-11:30 in Strasbourg.

    As main topic on the draft agenda there will be the following two Items:

    • Nomination of the representative of the Gender Mainstreaming Network
    • Discussion on the relations between D-CN and PRC after lifting of sanctions

    This meeting will be held in camera.

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Hearings – The European Defence Union: Tax Matters – 25-06-2025 – Subcommittee on Tax Matters – Committee on Security and Defence

    Source: European Parliament

    On 25 June 2025, from 14:30 to 16:15, the FISC Subcommittee will host a joint public hearing with the SEDE Committee on “The European Defence Union: Tax Matters”. The hearing will focus on the legislative framework governing VAT exemptions for defence-related activities carried out under the EU’s Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP).

    It will examine the 2015 Council Decision granting VAT exemptions to NATO and EU agencies for defence efforts supporting the implementation of Union activities, and assess how effectively Member States are applying these provisions.

    In particular, the discussion will explore the cooperation mechanisms between the European Commission, national Ministries of Finance, and Ministries of Defence in ensuring consistent and compliant implementation of the VAT exemptions. The panel will also address the operational and administrative challenges encountered in the field. The insights gathered will contribute to the broader debate on strengthening the fiscal framework underpinning European defence initiatives, including the European Defence Industry Programme (EDIP) and upcoming measures under the ReArm Europe Plan and Readiness 2030 strategy.

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Latest news – Delegation Meeting, on 27 November 2024 – Delegation for relations with Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kosovo, including the EU-Bosnia and Herzegovina Stabilisation and Association Parliamentary Committee and the EU-Kosovo Stabilisation and Association Parliamentary Committee

    Source: European Parliament

    Members of the Delegation to the Delegation for relations with Bosnia and Herzegovina, and Kosovo

    met on 27 November 2024 from 15:00 to 16:00.

    They exchanged views on the political and economic situation in Kosovo, and on the status of EU relations with the country, with:

    – Ms Barbara JESUS-GIMENO, Head of the Bosnia and Herzegovina/Kosovo Unit, DG NEAR, European Commission

    – Ms Zuzana MICHALCOVA SUTIAKOVA, Head of the ‘Western Balkans’, European External Action Service

    MIL OSI Europe News –