Category: Americas

  • MIL-OSI USA: Murphy, Underwood Demand Answers from DHS on Executive Actions and Funding Decisions

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Connecticut – Chris Murphy

    February 27, 2025

    WASHINGTON—U.S Senator Chris Murphy (D-Conn.), Ranking Member of the U.S. Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Homeland Security, and U.S. Representative Lauren Underwood (D-Ill.), Acting Ranking Member of the U.S. House Appropriations Subcommittee on Homeland Security, on Thursday sent a letter to U.S. Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem raising concerns about the implementation and funding of recent Executive Actions affecting the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). Murphy and Underwood emphasize the consequences of prioritizing civil immigration enforcement over national security threats and call for transparency on DHS’s compliance with existing laws, funding decisions, and policy changes.

    Full text of the letter is available HERE and below:

    Dear Secretary Noem,  

    The recent Executive Actions direct significant changes across the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) with potentially grave implications for the DHS mission, its employees, American communities, and for the resources provided by Congress in prior fiscal years (FY). Given the consequences of prioritizing civil immigration enforcement over the prevention of future attacks against the United States, we have several questions relating to the execution and implementation of the identified subject areas below. We request the information and responses by March 5, unless otherwise indicated.

    Specifically, we ask for:

    1. Written updates on the status of DHS’s review of grants for non-governmental organizations pursuant to the Presidential Memorandum for the Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies entitled “Advancing United States Interests When Funding Nongovernmental Organizations” (February 6, 2025).
    2. Written updates on the status of DHS’s compliance with current law relating to requests for assistance to the Department of Defense (DOD), specifically whether DHS complied with the requirement to conduct an ‘alternatives analysis’ and a cost-benefit analysis as specified.2
    3. Written updates on the status of DHS’s compliance with the Ms. L, et al. vs. ICE, et al. court settlement regarding family separation. Additionally, please provide responses relating to the questions below on any funding agreements DHS has signed since January 20, 2025.
    4. Please provide written copies of all DHS or component specific memorandums and field guidance that cover the implementation of the Executive Actions and other policy changes that impact DHS signed since January 20, 2025.
      1. To the extent detailed funding implications are not covered in the memos or guidance (as described below), please provide responses to the following:
        1. If using current or prior year funds to execute the Executive Actions, please identify by Executive Action(s), the directed action within such Executive Action(s), the funding source(s) (by account/Program Project Activity), and total amount(s); and
        2. If additional resources are needed, please identify the type of resources (e.g., personnel, assets, etc.), the Executive Action(s) supported through these resources, anticipated amount(s) and source(s) for those funds, including whether Congress should anticipate a budget amendment to FY 2025.

    Please specify whether DHS, or any component, plan to make any changes from direction provided in the FY 2024 enacted appropriations bill (P.L. 118-47, Division C) and the accompanying Joint Explanatory Statement regarding the purpose(s) for funding provided, including any level(s) specified, such as hiring levels, detention beds, etc. during the period of the continuing resolution.

    1. If so, when will DHS provide notice to the Committees on these changes?
    2. What quantifiable measures does DHS, or any component, plan to use to assess the results of the Executive Actions issued after January 20, 2025?
    3. Do any funds Congress provided for the Shelter and Services Program (SSP), Citizenship and Integration Grant Program, and the Case Management Pilot Program remain frozen or paused?
      1. If funds for these programs remain frozen or paused, please explain the statutory authority permitting DHS to freeze or pause Congressionally appropriated funding and the process and timeline for DHS to make those funds available to recipients.
      2. Please provide a timeline of any actions taken related to the funding freeze or pause, as well as how the review of these programs has been handled.
      3. Please provide a copy of any additional departmental guidance from DHS leadership related to these funds.
    4. Please provide written copies of all external funding agreements DHS has entered since January 20, 2025, including interagency agreements, federal partnership agreements, and agreements with non-federal entities, to include agreements with state, local, and tribal governments.

    In conclusion, as we move forward in the 119th Congress we trust that the transparency, communication, and commitment to work with our Committees will continue as it has in prior Administrations. We look forward to your response and your response to our joint letter to you from February 14th that is past our requested deadline.

    Sincerely,

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Canada: Statement by the Prime Minister on the results of the provincial election in Ontario

    Source: Government of Canada – Prime Minister

    The Prime Minister, Justin Trudeau, today issued the following statement on the results of the provincial election in Ontario:

    “On behalf of the Government of Canada, I congratulate Doug Ford and the Progressive Conservative Party of Ontario on their re‑election.

    “At this crucial time, we must work together to defend Canadian interests, protect workers and businesses, and grow our economy. This includes making progress on the top-of-mind priorities of Ontarians and all Canadians – creating good-paying jobs, building more homes, and investing in health care and affordable child care.

    “Together, we can build stronger communities and a stronger, fairer province and country for everyone.”

    MIL OSI Canada News

  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: President Lai presides over third meeting of Healthy Taiwan Promotion Committee

    Source: Republic of China Taiwan

    Details
    2024-11-28
    President Lai presides over second meeting of Healthy Taiwan Promotion Committee
    On the afternoon of November 28, President Lai Ching-te presided over the second meeting of the Healthy Taiwan Promotion Committee. In his opening statement, the president said that we are implementing mental health support programs this year to provide more support for young and middle-aged people, pointing out that the policy has served over 20,000 people since it was implemented just over three months ago. In terms of bolstering mental health resiliency, the president said we still have much to do, our government must lead by example, and the public and private sectors must work together, making every effort to ensure that no one is left behind. Noting that our goal is to reduce the standardized cancer mortality rate by one-third by the year 2030, President Lai stated that next year’s budget for cancer screening will be increased to NT$6.8 billion. He also stated that plans are in the works to establish a fund for new cancer drugs, adding that in the general budget we will allocate NT$5 billion, which will gradually rise to NT$10 billion. At the same time, he said, we are also actively promoting genetic testing and precision medicine. He expressed confidence that expanding preventive screening at the front end and providing advanced treatments at the back end will effectively fight cancer and improve the overall health of our citizens. A translation of President Lai’s opening statement follows: Today is the second meeting of the Healthy Taiwan Promotion Committee. First, I want to thank our two deputy conveners, our advisors and committee members, and our friends online for their enthusiastic participation. I also want to welcome Committee Member Chien Wen-jen (簡文仁), who was on leave for the previous meeting. I would also like to introduce three new committee members: Let’s welcome Committee Member Huang Chin-shun (黃金舜), president of the Federation of Taiwan Pharmacists Associations. During the pandemic, he led the nation’s pharmacists in promoting services including name-based distribution systems for masks and rapid-test kits and home delivery of medications. I am sure that he will be able to provide many valuable views regarding pharmaceutical safety and supply resilience.    Let’s also welcome Committee Member Ko Fu-yang (柯富揚). During his time as secretary-general of the National Union of Chinese Medical Doctors’ Association, he led the Chinese medicine community in the transition from experience-based medicine to evidence-based medicine, and promoted the modernization of traditional Chinese medicine. With his participation, the committee will be able to spur research and development in both modern and traditional medicine. Our third new committee member is Liao Mei-nan (廖美南), president of the Taiwan Nurses Association, who was unable to be here today. She has long been dedicated to raising the quality of nursing care and actively promoting a high-quality, friendly work environment for nurses. The committee will rely on her experience to strengthen the link between policy and practice in nursing care. I want to thank all the members of the committee once again for working together with the government. Since the last committee meeting, under the guidance of Minister without Portfolio Chen Shih-chung (陳時中), the Ministry of Health and Welfare (MOHW) has implemented various policies. At the beginning of October, for example, three major AI centers were set up to resolve three key AI application issues: implementation, certification, and reimbursement, helping advance Taiwan’s smart healthcare ecosystem. At today’s meeting, the MOHW will first deliver a report on the progress of certain items listed in the first committee meeting, followed by a joint report by the MOHW and Ministry of Education on bolstering public mental health resilience and a report by the MOHW on enhancing cancer prevention and treatment strategies.  The World Health Organization has affirmed that “there is no health without mental health.” In a fast-changing, fast-paced society, the government should invest more resources in the field of mental health to safeguard the people’s overall health. We are therefore implementing mental health support programs this year and expanding the range of eligibility, from 15 to 30, to 15 to 45 years old, to provide more support for young and middle-aged people. That policy has served over 20,000 people since it was implemented just over three months ago. In terms of bolstering mental health resiliency, we still have much to do. From the workplace to the campus and every corner of society, our government must lead by example, and the public and private sectors must work together, making every effort to ensure that no one is left behind.    Aside from mental health, in view of cancer being the leading cause of death in Taiwan for 42 consecutive years, our goal is to reduce the standardized cancer mortality rate by one-third by the year 2030. And so we must expand screening and advance treatment. Last year, the government subsidized screenings for five types of cancer, providing a total of 4.87 million screenings and detecting 11,000 cases of cancer and 52,000 cases of precancerous conditions. We have allocated an additional NT$4 billion beginning next year, bringing the total budget for cancer screening to NT$6.8 billion, to expand the scope of cancer screening eligibility and services.  Plans are also in the works to establish a fund for new cancer drugs. In next year’s general budget we will allocate NT$5 billion, which will gradually rise to NT$10 billion, to provide reimbursement funding for a variety of new cancer drugs and reduce the economic burden on patients. These new measures will be reported on in detail moments from now by the MOHW. At the same time, we are also actively promoting genetic testing and precision medicine. Next generation sequencing, for example, has already been included in National Health Insurance coverage, which will help provide patients with precise, individualized treatment strategies. I am confident that expanding preventive screening at the front end and providing advanced treatments at the back end will effectively fight cancer and improve the overall health of our citizens. Today’s meeting will help the government understand viewpoints from many perspectives so we can promote policies that more closely meet the public’s needs. Let’s keep working hard together. Thank you.  Following his statement, President Lai heard a report on the progress of certain items listed in the first committee meeting from deputy executive secretary and National Health Insurance Administration Director General Shih Chung-liang (石崇良), a joint report on bolstering public mental health resilience from Deputy Minister of Health and Welfare Lin Ching-yi (林靜儀) and Deputy Minister of Education Lin Teng-chiao (林騰蛟), and a report on enhancing cancer prevention and treatment strategies from Deputy Minister of Health and Welfare Chou Jih-haw (周志浩). Afterward, President Lai exchanged views with the committee members regarding the content of the reports.  

    Details
    2024-11-28
    President Lai presides over first meeting of Healthy Taiwan Promotion Committee
    On the afternoon of August 22, President Lai Ching-te presided over the first meeting of the Healthy Taiwan Promotion Committee. As the committee’s convener, the president presented committee members with their letters of appointment, and explained that the Healthy Taiwan Promotion Committee is not just about promoting a Healthy Taiwan, but also achieving a Balanced Taiwan. The president stated that the committee spans various areas of expertise, and also considers the balance of Taiwan’s northern, central, southern, and eastern regions. The president expressed confidence that by soliciting a wide range of suggestions, engaging in diverse dialogue, and forging a consensus, the committee can help to realize health equality and further elevate the standard of medical care in Taiwan. President Lai indicated that next year, the Ministry of Health and Welfare’s total budget will be increased, along with expanded investment in medical treatment and care. In addition, he reported that the central government budget has also added a National Health Insurance (NHI) financial assistance program, which will help to enhance the work environments of healthcare professionals. The president stated that we will also launch the Healthy Taiwan Cultivation Plan to help rear talent and develop smart medicine. These budgets and programs, President Lai stated, reflect the government’s determination to create a Healthy Taiwan, and prove that “Healthy Taiwan” is not just a slogan, and has already been turned into concrete action. A translation of President Lai’s opening statement follows: At the end of my first month in office, I announced that the Presidential Office will establish three committees in response to three major global issues of nationwide concern: climate change, health promotion, and social resilience. These committees will consolidate forces from different sectors to strategize on national development. At the beginning of this month, we convened the first meeting of the National Climate Change Committee. Today, we convene the first meeting of the Healthy Taiwan Promotion Committee. I would like to thank the three deputy conveners and all advisors and committee members for making a commitment to the Healthy Taiwan Promotion Committee. I also want to thank our fellow citizens and friends joining us online to follow the committee’s proceedings. During my campaign, I was constantly thinking about what I could contribute to our people that is different from past presidents if I were fortunate enough to be elected. After a lot of thought, I felt that as a physician, I should utilize my professional background in health care and work together with people from all sectors of society to help create a Healthy Taiwan. Healthy Taiwan is our goal, and health is both a basic human right and a universal value. Health promotion not only involves the well-being of a nation’s people, but is also of great concern to humankind so that we may survive and thrive. Taiwan is a responsible member of the international community. Amid the challenges of the pandemic over the past few years, we have shared disease prevention supplies, technology, and experience with countries around the world, and have continued to contribute to the global public health system. Going forward, Taiwan must actively address critical health-related challenges, including cancer, transnational communicable diseases of unknown origin, antibiotic-resistant superbugs, a low birth rate, and an aging society. We are confident that, sharing countermeasures and experience with countries around the world, we can keep people healthy and make the nation stronger so that the world embraces Taiwan. I want to thank former Superintendent of National Cheng Kung University Hospital Chen Jyh-hong (陳志鴻), who is also a mentor of mine, for organizing five regional forums and a national forum for the Healthy Taiwan Promotion Alliance this past March and April. Over 1,200 healthcare professionals from all over the country attended the forums and shared their views. Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰), Vice Premier Cheng Li-chiun (鄭麗君), and I were also invited to attend the national forum and participate in full. I also want to thank the experts from various fields for their suggestions throughout this process, which became key reference points for promoting policies after we took office on May 20. The position paper on the table in front of you is a compilation of those valuable insights, which will be the foundation of our future actions. To implement the Healthy Taiwan initiative, we must also achieve a Balanced Taiwan. Therefore, the Healthy Taiwan Promotion Committee established today not only spans various areas of expertise, but also considers the balance of Taiwan’s northern, central, southern, and eastern regions to achieve nationwide health equality. I want to thank the nine advisors here with us today: Superintendent Wu Ming-shiang (吳明賢), Superintendent Chen Wei-ming (陳威明), Chairman Cherng Wen-jin (程文俊), President Chiu Kuan-ming (邱冠明), and Chairman Chang Hong-jen (張鴻仁) from northern Taiwan; Superintendent Chen Mu-kuan (陳穆寬) from central Taiwan; Superintendent Lin Sheng-che (林聖哲) and President Yu Ming-lung (余明隆) from southern Taiwan; and Superintendent Lin Shinn-zong (林欣榮) from eastern Taiwan. Your participation will give us a better understanding of viewpoints from around the country. The objective of Healthy Taiwan is to raise the population’s average life expectancy while simultaneously reducing time spent living with illness or disability, while also caring for physical, mental, and spiritual health. The 20 members of the committee are therefore drawn from a variety of fields of professional expertise. We have Superintendent Chen Shih-ann (陳適安) in the field of smart medicine, Vice-Superintendent Susan Shur-fen Gau (高淑芬) in pediatric psychiatry, medical and long-term care service integration specialist Superintendent Chan Ding-cheng (詹鼎正), and emerging infectious disease specialist Director Shen Ching-fen (沈靜芬). We have also invited Professor Tsai Sen-tien (蔡森田) to provide suggestions on optimizing healthcare services and health insurance sustainability, and invited President Chou Ching-ming (周慶明) and President Huang Cheng-kuo (黃振國) to continue promoting the Family Medicine Plan and report on primary care issues. We have also recruited President Li Yi-heng (李貽恒), who put forward the 888 Program for prevention and treatment of the “three highs” (high blood pressure, high cholesterol, and high blood sugar) and kidney disease, pediatric health specialist President Ni Yen-hsuan (倪衍玄), women’s health care specialist Secretary-General Huang Jian-pei (黃建霈), and President Hung Te-jen (洪德仁), who is focused on community development. We also have Dean Shan Yan-shen (沈延盛) from the field of cancer prevention and treatment, psychiatric and mental health specialist Professor Su Kuan-pin (蘇冠賓), epidemiology expert and Emeritus Research Fellow Ho Mei-shang (何美鄉), and biomedicine and regenerative medicine specialist Professor Patrick Ching-ho Hsieh (謝清河). The committee also includes specialist in nutrition and health for all ages President Kuo Su-e (郭素娥), and expert in the promotion of physical activity and health Vice Chairman Chien Wen-jen (簡文仁). I also want to thank Chairman Lin De-wen (林德文) for participating as we work together to enhance the health and well-being of indigenous peoples. In addition, public sector participants include Minister of National Development Liu Chin-ching (劉鏡清) and Minister of Education Cheng Ying-yao (鄭英耀), as well as Minister of Health and Welfare Chiu Tai-yuan (邱泰源), who is serving as executive secretary, and NHI Administration Director General Shih Chung-liang (石崇良) serving as deputy executive secretary. Over 80 percent of the committee’s members are from the private sector, and I will take advantage of this opportunity to continue to combine the strengths of all stakeholders throughout society to promote a healthy lifestyle for one and all, and enhance medical care for all ages. At today’s first meeting of the committee, the Ministry of Health and Welfare will brief us on two topics: the first is the Healthy Taiwan vision plan, illustrating Taiwan’s current challenges and opportunities, as well as an action blueprint. The second issue is reform and optimization for NHI sustainability. Next year will mark the 30th anniversary of our NHI system. NHI is the pride of Taiwan, because health insurance can free citizens from the vicious cycle of poverty caused by illness, or illness caused by poverty. Since 2020, the NHI system has achieved a public satisfaction rate of over 90 percent. Next year, Taiwan will also become a “super-aged society,” which means that one of every five people will be a senior citizen 65 or older. Due to new pharmaceuticals of all kinds, the development of new technologies, and citizen expectations for an optimized medical practice environment, many aspects of health insurance operations will face an increasing number of challenges. The NHI system’s core values are health equality and mutual assistance for all. Better care for everyone, however, depends on sustainable NHI operations. We closely monitor NHI system point values, but also want to embody the greater values of the system. The government will continue to refine the budget system and management, rationally distribute medical resources and stabilize point values, and continue to optimize NHI finances to enhance the efficiency and quality of services. We also look forward to working with everyone to achieve sustainable NHI development, enhance health equality, and further elevate the standard of medical care in Taiwan. I also want to report that next year, the Ministry of Health and Welfare’s total budget will reach NT$370.2 billion, an increase of NT$31.8 billion over this year. The total budget is expected to allocate NT$60.7 billion to expand investment in medical treatment and care to create a Healthy Taiwan. The central government budget has also added an NHI financial assistance program that includes incentives for maintaining specified nurse-patient ratios across all three shifts and rotating night-shift nursing staff, and promoting smart information upgrades at medical facilities to enhance the work environments of healthcare professionals. We will also launch the Healthy Taiwan Cultivation Plan, investing funds to support medical institutions at all levels nationwide, rear talent, and develop smart medicine. Regarding the fund for new cancer drugs that many cancer patients care deeply about, in next year’s general budget we will allocate NT$5 billion for health insurance funding. In 2026, that figure is expected to reach NT$10 billion. We will also promote the fifth-stage national plan for cancer prevention and treatment, and beginning next year the budget for cancer screening will be increased by NT$4 billion, reaching NT$6.8 billion, to boost screening rates. I want everyone to know that these budgets and programs reflect the government’s determination to create a Healthy Taiwan. Since I took office, the government has created plans and programs to increase nursing staff levels and promote public mental health. We also launched an Acute Hospital Care at Home pilot project to provide integrated long-term and medical care services. Once again, I would like to thank everyone here today for participating, and thank our fellow citizens for their support. I also want our fellow citizens to know that Healthy Taiwan is not just a slogan, and has already been turned into concrete action. These are all concrete, substantive actions by a government team that has been in office for less than 100 days. I am confident that with the support and participation of our committee members and advisors, and through soliciting a wide range of suggestions, engaging in diverse dialogue, and forging a consensus, our actions to create a Healthy Taiwan will more closely align with society’s expectations, and we will move more quickly and steadily toward realizing our vision. Thank you. Following his statement, President Lai presented letters of appointment to the committee members, heard a report from Minister Chiu illustrating the Healthy Taiwan vision plan, and heard a report from Director General Shih on reform and optimization for NHI sustainability. Afterward, President Lai exchanged views with the committee members regarding the content of the two reports and the Rules of Procedure for Meetings of the Office of the President Healthy Taiwan Promotion Committee.

    Details
    2024-11-28
    President Lai attends opening of International Conference on Emergency Medicine 2024
    On the morning of June 20, President Lai Ching-te attended the opening ceremony of the International Conference on Emergency Medicine (ICEM) 2024. In remarks, President Lai stated that one goal of his administration is to create an even healthier Taiwan and that we will continue to strengthen our capabilities in medicine and public health to enhance health for all and help make the world a better place. The president emphasized that the global disease prevention network is something every country should be a part of, and that if any country is missing from this network, the rest of the world will be at a disadvantage. The president then asked for the participants’ support for Taiwan to participate in the World Health Organization so that we may contribute even more to the global public health system. A transcript of President Lai’s remarks follows: I would like to begin by welcoming all guests from overseas to Taiwan. ICEM is the world’s largest conference on emergency medicine. Over 2,500 experts and academics from home and abroad have gathered here for this year’s conference. This not only underlines the importance of emergency medicine, but is also a testament to global cooperation in medicine. This year also marks TSEM’s [Taiwan Society of Emergency Medicine] 30th anniversary. I would like to thank Chairperson Ng Chip-jin (黃集仁), President Hsu Chien-chin (許建清), and everyone who helped bring ICEM to Taiwan. This conference will help expand people-to-people diplomacy, showing Taiwan’s development and contributions in emergency medicine to the world. I am confident that everyone here shares my belief that health is a basic human right. And to ensure this right, emergency medical professionals are indispensable. Before entering politics, I myself worked as a clinician. I know well that emergency rooms are at the frontline of hospitals, and often the last hope for those who need lifesaving care. Especially during the COVID-19 pandemic, we all witnessed the rapid response and important support of emergency medical professionals, who gave their all for the health of others. I want to take this opportunity to express my utmost respect for your work. The theme of ICEM 2024 is Glocalization of Emergency Medicine: Global Wisdom and Local Solution. With that in mind, I hope that through clinical research, public health, smart tech, and other strategies, we can help reduce disparities in emergency medicine around the world. Here in Taiwan, we have made major progress in emergency medicine, from developing a cutting-edge trauma care system to implementing advanced strategies for disaster response. We are also committed to training highly skilled professionals in the field, as well as developing an advanced medical infrastructure. This conference will give Taiwan the opportunity to share our experience, and allow everyone to exchange best practices, engage in discussions, and promote the global development of emergency medicine. One goal of my administration is to create an even healthier Taiwan. We will continue to strengthen our capabilities in medicine and public health to enhance health for all and help make the world a better place. A healthier Taiwan also means a booming medical sector, and an even higher quality and diversity of medical services. Taiwan has had, and will continue to have, many medical accomplishments to share with the world. Today, all of you gather here to continue making global contributions through emergency medicine. The mission of IFEM [International Federation for Emergency Medicine] is to create a world where all people, in all countries, have access to high quality emergency medical care. On this point, the global disease prevention network is something every country should be a part of. If any country is missing from this network, the rest of the world will be at a disadvantage. I would like to ask for your support for Taiwan to participate in the World Health Organization, so that we may contribute even more to the global public health system. And as President Hsu Chien-chin has said, although the road is long, if we travel together, we can travel far. With this vision as our guide, alongside our friends from around the world, Taiwan will strive to achieve our common goals and realize quality healthcare for all. I wish ICEM 2024 great success, and all participants a rewarding experience. I also invite you to travel around Taiwan during your stay, and get to know our beautiful nation. Following his remarks, President Lai and the distinguished guests took part in the kick-off ceremony for the conference. IFEM President Ffion Davies was also in attendance at the event.

    Details
    2024-11-28
    President Lai meets WHA action team
    On the morning of June 1, President Lai Ching-te met with members of Taiwan’s World Health Assembly (WHA) action team. In remarks, President Lai stated that standing on the front lines, the team fought for the human right to health for both Taiwan and the world. He also thanked the international community for their support for Taiwan. The president said that Taiwan is an indispensable member of the international community when it comes to ensuring global health security. In addition, he said that one of the new government’s goals is to create a healthier Taiwan, as we want our people to live longer and healthier, and that we want to leverage Taiwan’s strengths in public health and medicine. He said we will continue to deepen our partnerships with other countries as we build an even more resilient global public health system, and that a healthy Taiwan will help make the world a better place. A translation of President Lai’s remarks follows: I would like to warmly welcome our partners from the WHA action team back from Geneva, and express my appreciation for your hard work and efforts. Standing on the front lines, you fought for the human right to health for both Taiwan and the world, and we thank you for giving it your all. Your flight only just arrived at 7 a.m., but I can see that everyone is still in high spirits. You have truly put in your heart for Taiwan, and once again, I thank you all. It is regrettable that at this year’s WHA, constrained by political factors, a proposal item for Taiwan to join as an observer was not included in the agenda yet again. However, the hard work of our WHA action team over the years has already borne fruit. Last year, the Ministry of Health and Welfare signed MOUs with the public health agencies of the Czech Republic, Canada, and the United Kingdom, and bilateral talks this year included discussion on substantive cooperation. The bilateral talks carried out by our action team in Geneva were not only more numerous this year, but also involved officials of even higher level. The team also held professional forums addressing important issues of the WHA in cooperation with various medical and health organizations. This is all proof of Taiwan’s contribution toward global public health and the human right to health. The steps we take for Taiwan to participate in world health affairs will not falter. Support for Taiwan from the international community grows stronger year by year. This year, 26 member states of the World Health Organization and the European Union, which is an observer, directly or indirectly voiced their support for Taiwan’s participation in the WHA. Their support reaffirms that Taiwan is an indispensable member of the international community when it comes to ensuring global health security. Health knows no borders. Health is a basic human right. One of the new government’s goals is to create a healthier Taiwan. We want our people to live longer and healthier. And we also want to leverage Taiwan’s strengths in public health and medicine, as we deepen our cooperation with other countries and work together to advance the health of humankind and global sustainable development. I want to thank the member states for their support for Taiwan. I also want to once again thank the members of the WHA action team and our many friends, both here and outside of Taiwan, for their hard work on this issue. Moving forward, we will continue to deepen our partnerships with other countries as we build an even more resilient global public health system. So just as democratic Taiwan continues to shine its light upon the world, a healthy Taiwan will help make the world a better place. On that note, let us keep working together toward these goals. After President Lai concluded his remarks, Minister of Health and Welfare Chiu Tai-yuan (邱泰源) presented a photo collage to show President Lai some of the highlights of the action team’s activities in Geneva.

    Details
    2024-11-28
    President Tsai meets World Medical Association President Lujain Alqodmani
    On the morning of December 11, President Tsai Ing-wen met with a delegation led by World Medical Association (WMA) President Dr. Lujain Alqodmani. In remarks, President Tsai thanked the WMA for its many years of speaking up for Taiwan on the international stage. President Tsai emphasized that we will continue to show how Taiwan can help by actively contributing to global health security. The president expressed her belief that with Taiwan’s achievements and capabilities in medicine and public health, we can join forces with many more countries to optimize the medical environment and make a more positive impact on the health of humankind. A translation of President Tsai’s remarks follows: I extend a warm welcome to President Alqodmani, who is visiting Taiwan once again. I am also glad to see WMA Secretary General Dr. Otmar Kloiber. Both of you are well acquainted with Taiwan and are our close friends. You have demonstrated your support through concrete actions. I would like to express my deepest thanks. The WMA is the largest international NGO that represents physicians. You staunchly defend health security and the rights and interests of physicians around the world with professionality and impartiality. I want to take this opportunity to thank the WMA on behalf of the Taiwanese people for its longstanding support of our participation in the World Health Organization (WHO) and World Health Assembly (WHA). This May, for example, our WHA action team collaborated with the WMA to hold a forum on emergency medicine in Geneva in the lead-up to the WHA. We will continue to show how Taiwan can help by actively contributing to global health security. During the COVID-19 pandemic, Taiwan demonstrated the resilience of its public healthcare system and shared its experiences in combating the pandemic with the world. We have also shared our medical services and construction capabilities, two areas in which we excel, with our diplomatic allies to help enrich the lives of their people and enhance the quality and environment of healthcare. We hope that President Alqodmani and Secretary General Kloiber will continue to speak up for Taiwan on the international stage. I believe that with Taiwan’s achievements and capabilities in medicine and public health, we can join forces with many more countries to optimize the medical environment. Together, we can make a more positive impact on the health of humankind. I also want to thank the Taiwan Medical Association (TMA) for serving as a bridge of communication between the government and the medical community, which helps us in implementing many of our policies. We look forward to the TMA further expanding exchanges and cooperation between the medical and international communities. I am looking forward to exchanging ideas with you today. Your visit to Taiwan will no doubt lay the groundwork for further cooperation. I wish you all a successful trip.

    Details
    2025-02-14
    President Lai holds press conference following high-level national security meeting
    On the morning of February 14, President Lai Ching-te convened the first high-level national security meeting of the year, following which he held a press conference. In remarks, President Lai announced that in this new year, the government will prioritize special budget allocations to ensure that Taiwan’s defense budget exceeds 3 percent of GDP. He stated that the government will also continue to reform national defense, reform our legal framework for national security, and advance our economic and trade strategy of being rooted in Taiwan while expanding globally. The president also proposed clear-cut national strategies for Taiwan-US relations, semiconductor industry development, and cross-strait relations. President Lai indicated that he instructed the national security and administrative teams to take swift action and deliver results, working within a stable strategic framework and according to the various policies and approaches outlined. He also instructed them to keep a close watch on changes in the international situation, seize opportunities whenever they arise, and address the concerns and hope of the citizens with concrete actions. He expressed hope that as long as citizens remain steadfast in their convictions, are willing to work hand in hand, stand firm amidst uncertainty, and look for ways to win within changing circumstances, Taiwan is certain to prevail in the test of time yet again. A translation of President Lai’s remarks follows: First, I would like to convey my condolences for the tragic incident which occurred at the Shin Kong Mitsukoshi department store in Taichung, which resulted in numerous casualties. I have instructed Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) to lead the relevant central government agencies in assisting Taichung’s municipal government with actively resolving various issues regarding the incident. It is my hope that these issues can be resolved efficiently. Earlier today, I convened this year’s first high-level national security meeting. I will now report on the discussions from the meeting to all citizens. 2025 is a year full of challenges, but also a year full of hope. In today’s global landscape, the democratic world faces common threats posed by the convergence of authoritarian regimes, while dumping and unfair competition from China undermine the global economic order. A new United States administration was formed at the beginning of the year, adopting all-new strategies and policies to address challenges both domestic and from overseas. Every nation worldwide, including ours, is facing a new phase of changes and challenges. In face of such changes, ensuring national security, ensuring Taiwan’s indispensability in global supply chains, and ensuring that our nation continues to make progress amidst challenges are our top priorities this year. They are also why we convened a high-level national security meeting today. At the meeting, the national security team, the administrative team led by Premier Cho, and I held an in-depth discussion based on the overall state of affairs at home and abroad and the strategies the teams had prepared in response. We summed up the following points as an overall strategy for the next stage of advancing national security and development. First, for overall national security, so that we can ensure the freedom, democracy, and human rights of the Taiwanese people, as well as the progress and development of the nation as we face various threats from authoritarian regimes, Taiwan must resolutely safeguard national sovereignty, strengthen self-sufficiency in national defense, and consolidate national defense. Taiwan must enhance economic resilience, maintain economic autonomy, and stand firm with other democracies as we deepen our strategic partnerships with like-minded countries. As I have said, “As authoritarianism consolidates, democratic nations must come closer in solidarity!” And so, in this new year, we will focus on the following three priorities: First, to demonstrate our resolve for national defense, we will continue to reform national defense, implement whole-of-society defense resilience, and prioritize special budget allocations to ensure that our defense budget exceeds 3 percent of GDP. Second, to counter the threats to our national security from China’s united front tactics, attempts at infiltration, and cognitive warfare, we will continue with the reform of our legal framework for national security and expand the national security framework to boost societal resilience and foster unity within. Third, to seize opportunities in the restructuring of global supply chains and realignment of the economic order, we will continue advancing our economic and trade strategy of being rooted in Taiwan while expanding globally, strengthening protections for high-tech, and collaborating with our friends and allies to build supply chains for global democracies. Everyone shares concern regarding Taiwan-US relations, semiconductor industry development, and cross-strait relations. For these issues, I am proposing clear-cut national strategies. First, I will touch on Taiwan-US relations. Taiwan and the US have shared ideals and values, and are staunch partners within the democratic, free community. We are very grateful to President Donald Trump’s administration for their continued support for Taiwan after taking office. We are especially grateful for the US and Japan’s joint leaders’ statement reiterating “the importance of maintaining peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait as an indispensable element of security and prosperity for the international community,” as well as their high level of concern regarding China’s threat to regional security. In fact, the Democratic Progressive Party government has worked very closely with President Trump ever since his first term in office, and has remained an international partner. The procurement of numerous key advanced arms, freedom of navigation critical for security and stability in the Taiwan Strait, and many assisted breakthroughs in international diplomacy were made possible during this time. Positioned in the first island chain and on the democratic world’s frontline countering authoritarianism, Taiwan is willing and will continue to work with the US at all levels as we pursue regional stability and prosperity, helping realize our vision of a free and open Indo-Pacific. Although changes in policy may occur these next few years, the mutual trust and close cooperation between Taiwan and Washington will steadfastly endure. On that, our citizens can rest assured. In accordance with the Taiwan Relations Act and the Six Assurances, the US announced a total of 48 military sales to Taiwan over the past eight years amounting to US$26.265 billion. During President Trump’s first term, 22 sales were announced totaling US$18.763 billion. This greatly supported Taiwan’s defensive capabilities. On the foundation of our close cooperation with the past eight years’ two US administrations, Taiwan will continue to demonstrate our determination for self-defense, accelerate the bolstering of our national defense, and keep enhancing the depth and breadth of Taiwan-US security cooperation, along with all manner of institutional cooperation. In terms of bilateral economic cooperation, Taiwan has always been one of the US’s most reliable trade partners, as well as one of the most important cooperative partners of US companies in the global semiconductor industry. In the past few years, Taiwan has greatly increased both direct and indirect investment in the US. By 2024, investment surpassed US$100 billion, creating nearly 400,000 job opportunities. In 2023 and 2024, investment in the US accounted for over 40 percent of Taiwan’s overall foreign investment, far surpassing our investment in China. In fact, in 2023 and 2024, Taiwanese investment in China fell to 11 percent and 8 percent, respectively. The US is now Taiwan’s biggest investment target. Our government is now launching relevant plans in accordance with national development needs and the need to establish secure supply systems, and the Executive Yuan is taking comprehensive inventory of opportunities for Taiwan-US economic and trade cooperation. Moving forward, close bilateral cooperation will allow us to expand US investment and procurement, facilitating balanced trade. Our government will also strengthen guidance and support for Taiwanese enterprises on increasing US investment, and promote the global expansion and growth of Taiwan’s industries. We will also boost Taiwan-US cooperation in tech development and manufacturing for AI and advanced semiconductors, and work together to maintain order in the semiconductor market, shaping a new era for our strategic economic partnership. Second, the development of our semiconductor industry. I want to emphasize that Taiwan, as one of the world’s most capable semiconductor manufacturing nations, is both willing and able to address new situations. With respect to President Trump’s concerns about our semiconductor industry, the government will act prudently, strengthen communications between Taiwan and the US, and promote greater mutual understanding. We will pay attention to the challenges arising from the situation and assist businesses in navigating them. In addition, we will introduce an initiative on semiconductor supply chain partnerships for global democracies. We are willing to collaborate with the US and our other democratic partners to develop more resilient and diversified semiconductor supply chains. Leveraging our strengths in cutting-edge semiconductors, we will form a global alliance for the AI chip industry and establish democratic supply chains for industries connected to high-end chips. Through international cooperation, we will open up an entirely new era of growth in the semiconductor industry. As we face the various new policies of the Trump administration, we will continue to uphold a spirit of mutual benefit, and we will continue to communicate and negotiate closely with the US government. This will help the new administration’s team to better understand how Taiwan is an indispensable partner in the process of rebuilding American manufacturing and consolidating its leadership in high-tech, and that Taiwan-US cooperation will benefit us both. Third, cross-strait relations. Regarding the regional and cross-strait situation, Taiwan-US relations, US-China relations, and interactions among Taiwan, the US, and China are a focus of global attention. As a member of the international democratic community and a responsible member of the region, Taiwan hopes to see Taiwan-US relations continue to strengthen and, alongside US-China relations, form a virtuous cycle rather than a zero-sum game where one side’s gain is another side’s loss. In facing China, Taiwan will always be a responsible actor. We will neither yield nor provoke. We will remain resilient and composed, maintaining our consistent position on cross-strait relations: Our determination to safeguard our national sovereignty and protect our free and democratic way of life remains unchanged. Our efforts to maintain peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait, as well as our willingness to work alongside China in the pursuit of peace and mutual prosperity across the strait, remain unchanged. Our commitment to promoting healthy and orderly exchanges across the strait, choosing dialogue over confrontation, and advancing well-being for the peoples on both sides of the strait, under the principles of parity and dignity, remains unchanged. Regarding the matters I reported to the public today, I have instructed our national security and administrative teams to take swift action and deliver results, working within a stable strategic framework and according to the various policies and approaches I just outlined. I have also instructed them to keep a close watch on changes in the international situation, seize opportunities whenever they arise, and address the concerns and hope of the citizens with concrete actions. My fellow citizens, over the past several years, Taiwan has weathered a global pandemic and faced global challenges, both political and economic, arising from the US-China trade war and Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. Through it all, Taiwan has persevered; we have continued to develop our economy, bolster our national strength, and raise our international profile while garnering more support – all unprecedented achievements. This is all because Taiwan’s fate has never been decided by the external environment, but by the unity of the Taiwanese people and the resolve to never give up. A one-of-a-kind global situation is creating new strategic opportunities for our one-of-a-kind Taiwanese people, bringing new hope. Taiwan’s foundation is solid; its strength is great. So as long as everyone remains steadfast in their convictions, is willing to work hand in hand, stands firm amidst uncertainty, and looks for ways to win within changing circumstances, Taiwan is certain to prevail in the test of our time yet again, for I am confident that there are no difficulties that Taiwan cannot overcome. Thank you.

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Transcript: Governor Hochul is a Guest on CNN’s “OutFront”

    Source: US State of New York

    arlier today, Governor Hochul was a guest on CNN’s “OutFront” with Erin Burnett.

    AUDIO: The Governor’s remarks are available in audio form here.

    Erin Burnett, CNN: So now let’s go out front to the Democratic Governor of New York, Kathy Hochul. And Governor, so much to talk to you about, but obviously this is an issue now at the center of things for New York too, because you had been saying that you wanted to hire federal workers who, perhaps, had been part of this purge. So what’s your reaction when you hear this federal judge saying that what OPM is doing — at least at this point in those mass firings of workers who had only been in their jobs for one or two years, shorter term — is unlawful?

    Governor Hochul: Two reactions: One is, I’m not surprised. And number two, thank God we have a judiciary as a check on the overreach of power that we’re witnessing by the hour by Donald Trump and Elon Musk.

    So yes, this is an important decision that says, “You went too far.” But I think that we’ll be seeing a lot more cases where the judges say, “This has never happened in the history of the universe,” and this is the new world we’re in. They don’t believe in laws. They don’t believe in the system of government we have. They don’t believe in states rights. They’re just like, bulldozing through it all, and thank God there’s a judge who stood up to them today.

    Erin Burnett, CNN: Well, I mean, the words do stand out, “Never any statute in the history of the universe.” Big statement to say I suppose, but that’s an existential question. Alright, so you also posted and this is what I wanted to get at. You posted in part, “Forget what DOGE says, New York wants YOU.” Alright, caps on the “YOU”. And you know, I spoke this week to one of those probationary workers who worked at Bronx Veterans Hospital. His name is Luke Graziani, 20 year veteran, four tours in Iraq and Afghanistan, fired from his job at the Bronx Hospital on Valentine’s Day. He goes in at the a.m., has the email, “You’re gone.” And he had five weeks until he wasn’t probationary, right? So it’s just very capricious in terms of how it happened. Let me just play some of what he said about what happened.

    Luke Graziani, Veteran: It’s surreal to think that, had this come five weeks later, I would have had no issues whatsoever. I’m very privileged to have the job that I have, or had. I’d very much like to get back to it. I think no one deserves a job, but if they’re willing to, you know, raise their right hand and swear the oath and become a federal service employee, I think that they have every right.

    Erin Burnett, CNN: So when you post you know, “Forget what DOGE says, New York wants YOU.” What does that mean for Luke?

    Governor Hochul: What that means is this: This administration loves to say, “You’re fired,” because they think they’re living in a game show once again. This is not a silly game called “The Apprentice.” These are real people’s lives. People like Luke — who works hard — he lives in Queens. He thought he had a job taking care of veterans and he’s a veteran himself.

    He served in Iraq and Afghanistan four times. These are the heroes. You know what they get from this administration? Instead of, “Thank you for your service,” they get, “You’re fired.” So I said, “These are the people who want to be part of our state workforce.” So not, “You’re fired,” but, “You’re hired.” So we set up a database. We want people to take a look at it. We have a shortage of state workers. We need more people to work. We need people that work in IT. We need people who want to be guards. We want to — we have people that can work in so many areas. But we respect public service in our state. We don’t denigrate it and treat these people like they’re nothing.

    And collateral damage to the buzzsaw of Elon Musk. This has to stop. But not only that, but they’re providing services to our seniors and taking care of programs. They keep people safe. They keep our skies safe. They’re researching ways to solve for bird flu. They’re helping us find cures for cancer. We have to honor their service. And right here in the State of New York, that’s exactly what we plan to do.

    Erin Burnett, CNN: Alright, so, let me ask you about some protests here in New York. And I know you’ve been obviously in the City all day. There were protesters demanding you use your powers, which you have as the Governor, to remove New York Mayor Eric Adams from office.

    One sign you see there, “Governor Hochul fire him,” and, “Shame on you Mayor Adams.” And another one says, claims, “Adams is Trump’s puppet.” And look, these are protests that came just a few days after you said you weren’t going to do that at the time. You had the option, you said, “I’m not going to get rid of him,” even amidst all of this consternation that he is doing Trump’s bidding on immigration, in exchange for those charges being dropped. He denies that that is a quid pro quo, but when you see these protests and you think about this situation, do you have any regrets? Do you think you should have gotten rid of him?

    Governor Hochul: No. People know this about me: There are often pressure campaigns that try to get me to do something I don’t want to do. It always backfires.

    I will stand up to protest when I believe I’m doing something that is right for the people of the State. And in this case, it is an extraordinary power that a governor has to be able to say, “I think you violated the public trust and you should go.” What I’m basically doing is overturning the will of New Yorkers who selected the Mayor to govern the City, and I’m trying to put in safeguards so people have a better sense—

    Erin Burnett, CNN: Now, if there weren’t primaries in June, would you feel differently?

    Governor Hochul: We have primaries in June. But also — overturning an election, unlike what the Trump administration would do — I have to respect the rule of law. I respect our democracy. But I’m keeping an eye on this.

    I understand the protests. I really do. I know why they’re frustrated. And they’re worried about undue influence from the Trump Administration, who’s trying so hard, trying so hard to tell me what to do, tell the Mayor what to do; try to tell all of us what to do. But we have to stand up to him, now more than ever and say, “No, you’re not going to boss us around. We’re New Yorkers.”

    Erin Burnett, CNN: Are you going to win on the congestion pricing? I mean, you went in, you made a presentation, you said you put it in his language. And, he says he wants to end the congestion pricing, which has reduced traffic. You have Broadway sales up, you have foot traffic up, you have businesses doing better. I mean, you’ve got numbers on your side.

    Governor Hochul: Yes, we do.

    Erin Burnett, CNN: He said he doesn’t care.

    Governor Hochul: It’s extraordinary to me that the President of the United States, who has a lot of other things on his plate, is focused on the Governor’s traffic policies in the City of New York. I mean, go focus on something else. This is for us to determine. This is part of our self determination as states. This was voted on by duly elected representatives of the people of New York, and you can’t overturn it without a fight from me. And that’s what we’re heading into. I believe we’ll be successful in the courts, and we’ll see what happens after that.

    If they want to work with me on helping fund new architecture and new infrastructure, let’s do Penn Station. Let’s do the Second Avenue subway. Let’s do the Interborough Express, which will connect Queens and Brooklyn for the first time. I’ve got so many great ideas that they can work with me on, but don’t shut down something that’s working just because you want to. Come on. It’s working. The data proves it. And the people of New York — many who hated it at first — are coming around saying life is better here now.

    Erin Burnett, CNN: Alright. Well, Governor Hochul, very much appreciate your time. And thank you so much.

    Governor Hochul: Thank you.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: SBA Opens Business Recovery Centers in Florida to Assist Small Businesses and Private Nonprofits Affected by Hurricanes Helene and Milton

    Source: United States Small Business Administration

    ATLANTA –The U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) announced the opening of three Business Recovery Centers (BRCs) in Manatee, Sarasota and Volusia counties to assist small businesses and private nonprofit (PNP) organizations who sustained economic losses from Hurricanes Helene and Milton.

    SBA customer service representatives will be on hand at the BRCs to answer questions about SBA’s disaster loan program, explain the application process and help individuals complete their application. Walk-ins are accepted, but you can schedule an in-person appointment in advance at appointment.sba.gov. The BRC’s opening dates and hours of operation are listed below.

    Business Recovery Center (BRC)  

    Manatee County  

    Tingley Memorial Library

    111 2nd St. N.  

    Bradenton Beach, FL 34217

    Opening: Friday, Feb. 28, 10 a.m. to 5 p.m.  

    Hours:         Monday – Friday, 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.  

     Closed:      Saturday and Sunday   

    Business Recovery Center (BRC)  

    Sarasota County  

     Sanford Information Center  

    (Entrance on Ringling Blvd)

     111 S. Orange Avenue

    Sarasota, FL 34236

     Opening: Monday, March 3, 10 a.m. to 5 p.m.  

     Hours:         Monday – Friday, 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.  

    Closed:       Saturday and Sunday  

    Business Recovery Center (BRC)  

    Volusia County  

    UCF Business Incubator Volusia County

    601 Innovation Way  

    Daytona Beach, FL 32114

    Opening: Friday, Feb. 28, 10 a.m. to 6 p.m.  

    Hours:         Monday – Friday, 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.  

    Closed:      Saturday and Sunday  

    “SBA’s BRCs have consistently proven their value to business owners following a disaster,” said Chris Stallings, associate administrator of the Office of Disaster Recovery and Resilience at the SBA. “Business owners can visit these centers to meet face-to-face with specialists who will guide them through the disaster loan application process and connect them with resources to support their recovery.

    The SBA’s Economic Injury Disaster Loan (EIDL) program is available to small businesses, small agricultural cooperatives, nurseries, and PNPs impacted by financial losses directly related to these disasters. The SBA is unable to provide disaster loans to agricultural producers, farmers, or ranchers, except for small aquaculture enterprises.

    EIDLs are available for working capital needs caused by the disaster and are available even if the business or PNP did not suffer any physical damage. The loans may be used to pay fixed debts, payroll, accounts payable, and other bills not paid due to the disaster.  

    The loan amount can be up to $2 million with interest rates as low as 4% for small businesses and 3.25% for PNPs, with terms up to 30 years. Interest does not accrue, and payments are not due, until 12 months from the date of the first loan disbursement. The SBA sets loan amounts and terms based on each applicant’s financial condition.

    To apply online and receive additional disaster assistance information visit sba.gov/disaster. Applicants may also call the SBA’s Customer Service Center at (800) 659-2955 or send an email to disastercustomerservice@sba.gov for more information on SBA disaster assistance. For people who are deaf, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability, please dial 7-1-1 to access telecommunications relay services.

    The deadlines to return economic injury applications are June 24, 2025, for Tropical Storm Debby and June 30, 2025, for Hurricane Helene.

    ###

    About the U.S. Small Business Administration

    The U.S. Small Business Administration helps power the American dream of business ownership. As the only go-to resource and voice for small businesses backed by the strength of the federal government, the SBA empowers entrepreneurs and small business owners with the resources and support they need to start, grow or expand their businesses, or recover from a declared disaster. It delivers services through an extensive network of SBA field offices and partnerships with public and private organizations. To learn more, visit www.sba.gov. 

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Hoeven Outlines Efforts to Reverse Biden Regulatory Onslaught, Make U.S. Energy Dominant

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for North Dakota John Hoeven

    02.26.25

    Senator’s CRA Resolution to Block Biden Natural Gas Tax Set for Final Passage in U.S. Senate Tomorrow

    WASHINGTON – During remarks delivered on the floor of the U.S. Senate today, Senator John Hoeven outlined efforts to reverse the Biden administration’s regulatory onslaught on U.S. domestic energy production:

    • In particular, Hoeven highlighted his Congressional Review Act (CRA) resolution to block implementation of Biden’s Natural Gas Tax, which passed as part of Democrats’ reckless tax-and-spend bill that passed in 2022.
      • The Senate began voting on Hoeven’s resolution today, with final passage expected to occur tomorrow.
    • Following his remarks, Hoeven voted to uphold the national energy emergency, which was declared by President Trump to unlock additional authorities empowering the development of U.S. energy resources and the infrastructure needed to get energy to market.
      • The national emergency was upheld by a vote of 52 to 47.

    “We’re working with President Trump to unleash America’s full energy potential and truly make our nation energy dominant. Energy security is national security and it is vitally important for our country,” said Hoeven. “We’ve worked diligently in the Senate to swiftly confirm President Trump’s cabinet officials, and we continue to do that. We made it a priority to ensure the president’s department heads are in place as we work to empower the U.S. to produce more energy from all of its abundant and affordable coal, oil, and gas reserves.

    “We also continue legislative efforts to get our country back to energy dominance. Soon, the Senate will vote on my resolution to nullify the Democrats’ natural gas tax rule, using the Congressional Review Act… Essentially, this puts a 5 percent or more added tax on natural gas. Now, think about that. Everybody uses natural gas to heat their homes, cook their meals and for many other purposes as well. It’s a tax on every consumer, and it’s regressive, hitting low-income individuals the hardest. This of course also has a disproportionate impact on small oil and gas producers in states like North Dakota, Montana and others.

              “Instead of new taxes that will curtail production, we need to support innovation and empower the kind of technology development that has enabled us to reduce emissions while producing more natural gas. That’s the answer, and it’s exactly what President Trump and Republicans have done and will continue to do.

              “We’re also working with the Trump administration to replace the Biden administration’s rules that closed off access to vast areas of taxpayer-owned energy resources… This is about taking the handcuffs off our energy producers and empowering them to increase supply and help bring down prices for American families and businesses. There is an energy component in every product and service we consume. When we make energy more plentiful and bring down that price, that helps reduce inflation, grow our economy, create more jobs and opportunities and, in fact, not only provide for our national security but help our allies as well.”

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Senate Passes Hoeven-Sponsored Resolution to Block Biden Natural Gas Tax, Protect Against Cost Increases

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for North Dakota John Hoeven

    02.27.25

    CRA Resolution Goes to President Trump for Signature

    WASHINGTON – Senator John Hoeven (R-N.D.) today secured Senate passage of his Congressional Review Act (CRA) resolution of disapproval to block implementation of President Biden’s Natural Gas Tax, which passed as part of the Democrats’ reckless tax-and-spend bill in 2022. The Senate approved the resolution by a vote of 52 to 47, and with Congressman August Pfluger’s (R-Texas) companion legislation having passed the House yesterday, the resolution now goes to President Trump to be signed into law.

    “We depend on natural gas for a wide array of needs, from manufacturing to home heating and cooking, all of which were going to be more expensive as a result of President Biden’s Natural Gas Tax,” said Senator Hoeven. “We’ve now moved our legislation through both chambers, and we look forward to it being signed by President Trump. This is an important milestone in our efforts to roll back the Biden administration’s harmful Green New Deal policies, unleash our domestic energy potential and make our nation truly energy dominant.”

    This legislation comes as part of Hoeven’s broader efforts to unlock America’s energy potential and rescind the wide array of costly taxes and regulations imposed under President Biden. Among other priorities, Hoeven is working to:

    • Improve access to taxpayer-owned energy resources.
    • Streamline the approval process for energy development and the construction of infrastructure needed to get energy to market.
    • Reduce the cost of energy production, fight inflation and bring down prices for American consumers.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Lee Introduces the Saving Privacy Act for 119th Congress

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Utah Mike Lee

    WASHINGTON – Senator Mike Lee (R-UT) introduced the Saving Privacy Act, a bill to end government abuse of Americans’ financial information. For years, federal agencies have been overreaching in their surveillance, collecting vast amounts of personal financial data from law-abiding citizens without just cause. Senator Rick Scott (R-FL) is an original co-sponsor of the bill.

    The federal government has no business surveilling the financial activities of millions of innocent Americans,” said Senator Lee. “The current system erodes the privacy rights of citizens, while doing little to effectively catch true financial criminals. My Saving Privacy Act ensures that Americans’ personal information is protected and that government agencies operate within the bounds of the Constitution.” 

    Big government has no place in law-abiding Americans’ personal finances. It is a massive overreach of the government and a gross violation of their privacy,” said Senator Rick Scott. “That is why I am teaming up with Senator Lee so that we can protect Americans’ personal financials for good. Our Saving Privacy Act will allow federal agencies to go after criminals while also protecting innocent Americans’ data. This is commonsense legislation, and I am urging my colleagues to support its immediate passage.”   

    “For decades, outdated banking regulations have subjected citizens to excessive financial surveillance, compelling institutions to enforce intrusive measures that directly led to the debanking of innocent Americans spending their own money. The Saving Privacy Act offers comprehensive reforms, striking a balance that restores consumer rights, establishes sensible standards for innovators while curbing illicit activities, and reinvigorates the commitment to sound consumer financial privacy. –Yaël Ossowski, Deputy Director at the Consumer Choice Center.

    “Senator Lee has been an indefatigable leader in the effort to end the federal government’s mass surveillance of Americans financial lives. A precondition of liberty is the ability to go about your business without the government tracking your every move, and the Saving Privacy Act is an important step in the right direction. The Taxpayers Protection Alliance thanks Senator Lee for his hard work and commitment to preserving liberty and privacy.” –David Williams, Taxpayers Protection Alliance President 

    “This kind of reform restores the proper balance—as provided by the Fourth Amendment—between Americans’ privacy rights and law enforcement’s ability to gather evidence to enforce laws. It would protect individuals’ financial privacy and improve federal agencies’ abilities to prosecute criminal activity rather than sift through millions of low-value reports. This kind of reform is long overdue.” – Norbert Michel, Jennifer Schulp, and Nicholas Anthony of the Cato Institute

    Government surveillance efforts have been largely ineffective, as demonstrated by the dismal success rate of suspicious activity reports (SARs) submitted to the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN). In FY2023, financial institutions submitted 25.4 million SARs and currency transaction reports (CTRs), yet less than 0.3% of these reports resulted in relevant IRS-CI and FBI cases.

    In recent years, FinCEN and the FBI surveilled the financial transactions of individuals and solicited banks for information on purchases related to “Trump,” “MAGA,” firearms, and even religious texts. Meanwhile, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has quietly been constructing a centralized database, the Consolidated Audit Trail (CAT), designed to track every single stock market transaction and the personal information of millions of Americans without any congressional approval.

    Senator Lee’s bill, the Saving Privacy Act, seeks to curb these abuses and restore Fourth Amendment protections for all Americans.

    Key Provisions of the Saving Privacy Act:

    • Repeals the Bank Secrecy Act’s SAR and CTR reporting requirements while maintaining recordkeeping provisions.
    • Repeals the Corporate Transparency Act.
    • Strengthens Fourth Amendment protections, bolstering warrant requirements in the Right to Financial Privacy Act of 1978.
    • Repeals the SEC’s Consolidated Audit Trail (CAT) database.
    • Requires congressional approval for any new databases that collect personally identifiable information of U.S. citizens.
    • Prohibits the creation of a Central Bank Digital Currency.
    • Requires congressional authorization for financial regulations deemed major rules.
    • Institutes penalties for federal employees who illegally seek constitutionally protected financial information.
    • Establishes a private right of action for Americans and financial institutions harmed by illicit government activity.

    For bill text, click HERE.
    For a two-pager, click HERE.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Lummis Applauds Trump Administration’s Effort to Streamline Environmental Review Process 

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Wyoming Cynthia Lummis

    February 27, 2025

    WASHINGTON, D.C. – Senate Western Caucus Chair Cynthia Lummis (R-WY) today applauded the Trump administration’s move to revise and streamline outdated National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) procedures. This Interim Final Rule rescinds the Council on Environmental Quality’s regulations for NEPA compliance.

    “For too long, western communities have waited for critical energy and infrastructure projects while paperwork piled up in Washington,” said Lummis. “I appreciate the Trump administration’s effort to initiate permitting reform. His balanced approach will ensure that environmental reviews focus on meaningful analysis rather than on endless and costly procedural hurdles.”

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Lummis, Crapo, Risch Release Statements Praising New USFS Chief

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Wyoming Cynthia Lummis

    WASHINGTON, D.C. – Senate Western Caucus Chair Cynthia Lummis (R-WY), along with Senators Mike Crapo (R-ID) and Jim Risch (R-ID) released the following statements today regarding the announcement that Tom Schultz will serve as the 21st chief of the U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service. 

    “President Trump and Secretary Rollins have made a great choice in naming Tom Schultz to lead the U.S. Forest Service,” said Lummis. “Tom is a University of Wyoming graduate and I’m confident that he is the leader who will bring balance back to the Forest Service and return the agency to responsible logging and management. I look forward to working with Tom to restore and protect our country’s great national forests.”

    “Congratulations to Idaho’s own Tom Schultz for being named the 21st Chief of the U.S. Forest Service. Tom is a forester’s forester. With over 27 years of natural resource management experience, he is the no-nonsense leader our Western states urgently need to rein in the wildfire crisis and reinforce forest health,” said Risch. “Tom’s selection to lead the U.S. Forest Service underscores President Trump and Secretary Rollins’ recognition of the immense value that Idahoans bring to restoring American greatness. I look forward to the good work Tom will accomplish for our nation and the West.”

    “Tom Schultz’s deep on-the-ground experience and skills, including his long-time service in Idaho, will be critically useful as he manages our federal forests,” said Crapo. “He intimately understands how federal decision-making impacts our great state, and I look forward to working with him in this capacity.”

    Background:

    Schultz previously served as vice president of resources and government affairs at Idaho Forest Group, where he led timber procurement operations and managed relationships with government officials at all levels. A former U.S. Air Force officer, Schultz also served as director of the Idaho Department of Lands, overseeing the management of several million surface acres of endowment lands and minerals. He held leadership roles in Montana’s Department of Natural Resources and Conservation, managing the Trust Lands and Water Resources Divisions.

    Schultz holds a bachelor’s degree in government from the University of Virginia, a master’s degree in political science from the University of Wyoming, and a master’s degree in forestry from the University of Montana.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: ICYMI—Hagerty Joins The Story With Martha MacCallum on Fox News to Discuss Trump’s Peace Negotiations

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Tennessee Bill Hagerty

    WASHINGTON—United States Senator Bill Hagerty (R-TN), a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and former U.S. Ambassador to Japan, today joined The Story With Martha MacCallum on Fox News to discuss President Donald Trump’s peace negotiations to end the war between Russia and Ukraine.

    *Click the photo above or here to watch*

    Partial Transcript

    Hagerty on Trump’s peace negotiations between Russia and Ukraine: “I think what President Trump has done in many ways is completely shift the dynamic, Martha. He’s finding a new place and frankly, giving [President] Vladimir Putin more room to negotiate, to get to a place where President Trump wants him to be […] One thing I’d point out, Martha, is that Trump’s relationship with Putin has been quite different. You recall during Trump’s first Administration; Putin did not take aggressive actions like this. It was under [Former President Barack] Obama that Putin came in and took Crimea. It was under [Former President Joe] Biden when he came in and had the most recent invasion and launched the war in Ukraine. Things will be very different with President Trump, and I think he’s setting up the circumstances so that they will be. So, I won’t be surprised at all to see President Trump and President Putin talk. I’ve been with the two of them before, and I can say this, Martha: there’s a great deal of respect from President Putin toward President Trump. And I think President Trump is going to leverage that respect to get to a deal that’s going to be better off for all concerned. He’s been clear at the outset; he wants this carnage to come to an end in Ukraine. Ukrainian people have died. Their country has been decimated. He wants it to end. He wants it to end under terms that are more favorable to the U.S. taxpayer. I think that’s going to come clear tomorrow, and by having more U.S. investment in Ukraine, Ukraine will be more secure and in a better place going forward.”

    Hagerty on U.S. competitive advantage with a strong economic foundation: “It certainly is a way that I look at it, and I think President Trump has a similar view. A strong economic foundation is at the core of our diplomacy, a strong military presence to top that. And [when] we have [a] strong economic relationship, a strong military posture, then diplomacy is effective and it’s possible. That’s the approach that President Trump is taking. In terms of comparing it to the [Chinese Communist Party] and their Belt and Road initiative, I might take a different tack there. The CCP uses what they call Debt-trap diplomacy. They come in making very strategic investments, often ones that countries can’t handle. They often use corruption as a tool, as a weapon. I think when you look at the United States and particularly conversations President Trump and I have had directly, what we look at is providing, for example, clean U.S. LNG to other parts of the world. That is a geostrategic tool that we can use that makes everyone better off economically and also aligns our economic interests, our energy interests, and our national security interests at the same time.”

    Hagerty on economic opportunities in a deal that could benefit the U.S.: “President Trump, if anything, is a world-class negotiator. And as I said, he tries to find a position to get on different footing. He’s been trying to get President [Volodymyr] Zelensky to the table on this critical minerals deal. We had him very close, then suddenly he wasn’t there. Now we’re back where we need him to be again. And on Friday, I look forward to [seeing] this deal come forward. It may be even more than just a critical minerals deal, but President Trump has been negotiating in his own style to get Zelensky back here in the United States, signing up to a deal that’s going to be better for all parties.”

    Hagerty on the importance of U.S. production of aluminum: “Aluminum is a critical national security interest for the United States. We have aluminum interest in my home state of Tennessee. I want to see the industry stronger here. And from a national security standpoint, I’m very focused on maintaining U.S. production of aluminum.”

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Fischer Questions John Phelan at Confirmation Hearing

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Nebraska Deb Fischer

    Today, U.S. Senator Deb Fischer (R-Neb.), a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, questioned John Phelan at the confirmation hearing on his nomination to be Secretary of the Navy.

    During the hearing, Senator Fischer asked Phelan about his commitment to ensure that the Department of Defense complies with existing statutory requirements to continue funding the development of the nuclear-armed sea-launched cruise missile (SLCM-N). She also asked about his plans to increase munitions production and address longstanding challenges with the shipbuilding industrial base.

    Click the image above to watch a video of Senator Fischer’s questioning

    Click here to download audio

    Click here to download video

    Fischer Questions Phelan:

    Senator Fischer: I appreciate you putting yourself forward to serve your country in this capacity. Mr. Phelan, in your advanced policy questions to the committee, you stated: “If confirmed, I will ensure that the Department complies with existing statutory requirements to continue funding development of the nuclear sea-launched cruise missile.” Do you stand by that statement? Yes, or no?

    John Phelan: Senator, I think the nuclear sea-launched cruise missile is a very important program. I have not been read in on the briefings on that, but I know it is a critical component to our defense.

    Senator Fischer: 
    And will you follow those statutory requirements?

    John Phelan: Yes, I will.

    Senator Fischer: Thank you, sir. To follow up on the shipbuilding part that’s been discussed by the chairman, the Strategic Posture Commission recommended the establishment of additional shipyards dedicated to nuclear-powered ships and submarines. If confirmed, would you be open to exploring that option?

    John Phelan: Yes, I would, Senator. I think it’s a very important part of our strategic focus.

    Senator Fischer: What we’ve learned from the war in Ukraine is that the United States’ defense industrial base was not equipped to scale up production rates of munitions for these modern conflicts. Is it your view that the United States must further increase munition production capacity?

    John Phelan: Yes, Senator, I think we’re at a critical shortage, and we have far too much dependence on one facility.

    Senator Fischer: Do you have any initial thoughts that you can share with us about steps that maybe you would be taking to ensure that the Navy has the munitions stockpiles that are required to meet the needs of the combatant commanders?

    John Phelan: Yes, Senator. I think, as you know, we are short munitions, as we’ve seen. I think we need to create more of a manufacturing base and incentivize more munitions plants in order to supplement what we already have. So, if confirmed, I intend to focus on this very quickly and get that resolved because I think we’re at a dangerously low level from a stockpile perspective, and as well as new.

    So I will use the skills that I had in the business world in terms of incenting. I think a lot of that also comes with working with you and the committee and Congress because we do need to send signals to the private sector to incentivize them to build these plants to get going. So, ordering and giving them a contract to build I think will be critical. And I’d like to believe we should be able to create a win-win between the private sector and for the taxpayer of the United States.

    Senator Fischer: You mentioned contracts with shipbuilding too: to be able to do a review of those contracts to make sure that there are incentives, so that private companies can make profits with that. You mentioned contracts again now. Would you look at that as well – look in depth on current contracts that we have with regards to our munitions? And if maybe what we’re looking at here are roadblocks in being able to move ahead with being able to provide these munitions?

    John Phelan: Thank you for the question, Senator. Yes, I intend to sit down – day one – and we are going to go through every contract that we have and understand what exactly they say; what flexibility they do or do not give us; what contract needs to change or not change and why. I intend to do the same thing as it relates to an audit.

    I need to understand why the Navy cannot pass an audit. The Marine Corps has done it two years running now. They deserve a lot of credit for that. I think that’s a great thing. We are going to change and create much more accountability and understanding, because all of these things affect readiness. And as I said in my statement, readiness is critical, and I think we are at a very critical inflection point, particularly versus our peer nuclear adversaries.

    So these are all things that are a reflection of a culture, as I mentioned, in decay. We really need to have a tight focus on these things. If we don’t know where our inventory is, how can we have a training mission? You know, I’ve heard stories of training missions that have failed because the equipment wasn’t there, and so we ended up losing that money, and that’s not good.

    Senator Fischer: Thank you very much, sir.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Fischer Questions Expert Witnesses on Grand Theft Cargo

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Nebraska Deb Fischer

    Today, U.S. Senator Deb Fischer (R-Neb.), a member of the Senate Commerce Committee, questioned expert witnesses on the importance of giving the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMSCA) authority to enforce penalties against unauthorized brokers engaged in freight fraud.

    During the hearing, Fischer questioned Chief Special Agent of the Burlington Northern and Santa Fe (BNSF) Railway Police Department Will Johnson about collaboration between local authorities and federal agencies on investigations that cross state lines.

    She also asked Principal and CEO of Tanger Logistics and Double Diamond Transport Adam Blanchard and Executive Vice President of Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association Lewie Pugh what additional tools and authorities could improve the enforcement of cargo freight fraud.

    Click the image above to watch a video of Senator Fischer’s questioning

    Click here to download audio

    Click here to download video

    Senator Fischer questions experts:

    Senator Fischer: Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Thank you, Mr. Pugh and Mr. Blanchard, for referencing my bill. I appreciate you doing that. I appreciate the support for the bill. I think it’s extremely important that we get that to move. It’s the Household Goods Shipping Consumer Protection Act that I’ve introduced with Senator Duckworth, and as you know, it would allow the FMCSA to impose those civil penalties against the unauthorized brokers, and it would require companies in the household goods sector to establish a principal place of business to prohibit fraudulent companies from skirting those existing regulations. I’d like to thank you also for bringing up suggestions on what else we can do to be able to combat this.

    It’s eye opening, the amount of money harm to companies, but also to consumers when we add all this together. So, thank you for that. Chief Johnson, in your testimony, you reference jurisdictional concerns that often arise when investigating cargo theft crimes, and I believe it’s particularly important that local and state law enforcement agencies have the support of the federal government when dealing with crimes that pertain to interstate commerce. In your experience, what is the relationship like between law enforcement and agencies like the FBI and the HSI when investigating cargo theft that crosses state lines?

    Will Johnson: Ma’am, the short answer is they are good relationships. The challenge is not necessarily with the relationships, but the capacity of organizations to be able to balance or juggle the myriad of threats that they’re faced with. Cargo theft, historically, has not risen to the same level of attention as maybe some other competing interests have for these federal entities.

    Also, it’s important to understand how those agencies prioritize the work within their AOR, or area of responsibility, and that’s largely a local decision by local executive leaderships for those agencies involved, absent some sort of national direction coming out of headquarters or the Attorney General’s office. I think for this topic, national direction either authorized by Congress for the task force that we’ve mentioned previously or prosecutorial direction coming out of the Attorney General’s Office directing all of the United States attorneys to prioritize this issue and focus resources on effective prosecutions will aid in the assistance of bringing these cases forward.

    Senator Fischer: 
    Thank you. You know, Mr. Blanchard, you spoke about your frustration in trying to just bring it to the attention of authorities—federal, state, I assume local as well that you were trying to work with. And when you mentioned some of your suggestions, I know Mr. Pugh wanted to chime in, so I’ll let you chime in now on what needs to be done. And it’s not, I don’t think it’s just throwing more money at being able to have more enforcement out there, necessarily. I think it’s also to be able to put some teeth in what we need to do here and just have more awareness.

    Adam Blanchard: I’d be happy to start, Senator. And again, thank you for your support of our industry and your introduction of the Household Goods Shipping Consumer Protection Act. I think that’s certainly a great first step. As I have come to understand, Senator, is currently, to piggyback off of Chief Johnson, the current threshold that’s established by the United States Sentencing Commission for the DOJ to interdict in cargo theft cases requires the instance to be at least $1.5 million in losses. So, the average loss in a cargo case is around $200,000 today. So therefore, to reach that threshold of $1.5 million is going to require law enforcement agencies to be directed to look into the continual criminal activity of these organizations to meet that threshold—or for Congress to otherwise change that and create a new directive in order for them to start pursuing these through a unified task force, which is something that we have included in the Safeguard Our Supply Chains Act, which has not been filed. But certainly, we would appreciate any member of this committee to review that bill, and the willingness to author that would be fantastic. And that would provide the coordination between agencies and law enforcement.

    And I think really, Senator, this begins with the FMCSA, and to further elaborate on Senator Young’s question earlier, in terms of the FMCSA, we have to start with them. I think to your point, Senator Fischer, throwing money at the problem, I would agree, is not the solution. I think first, we need Congress to direct FMCSA on the things that need to occur and the coordination necessary to address this very issue that we’re dealing with, they need to be able to distinguish between fraudulent businesses and legitimate businesses. DOT needs enhanced cyber capabilities and real time fraud detection tools and greater interagency collaboration with law enforcement to identify these frauds. FMCSA needs to be directed to remove fraudulent companies from the SAFER website. We rely on that heavily in order to vet companies that we work with. FMCSA needs to explicitly authorize to withhold registration from applicants who fail to provide verifications.

    Also Congress, we believe, should conduct rigorous oversight of FMCSA transition to a single USDOT number, which we believe they’re going to do in the future—or considering doing without placing undue burden on legitimate carriers. And DOT should expeditiously implement the 13 recommendations issued by the Government Accountability Office to strengthen FMCSA’s national consumer complaint database.

    And so those are things we believe that Congress could do without the necessity of additional funding in order to provide the coordinated effort necessary for law enforcement. Because we simply don’t have the tools, Senator, to be able to do the reverse IP searches to break through the cyber space in order to find who’s spoofing our emails. I have a very sophisticated IT director, and he’s great, but only law enforcement agencies have that capability.

    Lewie Pugh: I thank you, Senator Fisher, and you and Senator Duckworth on your bill. We very much appreciate that, and glad you’re trying to do something different and to help these things. It will pay dividends if we can get it across the finish line. A couple other things is this whole national consumer complaint database. It seems to be that FMCSA needs to be directed more to do something with that. From our experience and with our members—and we tell members to send these complaints, plus many other complaints that happen to them in trucking—it seems like this is where all complaints go to die at FMCSA. Usually, they hear nothing back. Or if they get anything, it’s just “Hey, thanks for letting us know.”

    Also, we’ve said for a long time, it would probably be helpful to have a different name. Most of our small business people and truckers, they don’t even realize that this is a place for them to go file a complaint because national consumer complaint database, who would think that’s a trucking complaint hotline? So that would be helpful.

    We feel FMCSA probably has enough funds to do some investigating on this. It’s just to reallocate where they’re putting, because they continually say that there’s not a safety effect to this. So that’s why they don’t have to do anything with this. But we know there is because it’s putting people out of business. It’s causing people not to be able to maintain their equipment. So there’s definitely a safety thing here. Plus, you know, who knows what happens to a trucker or something happens at gunpoint or something like that.

    And I would agree with my colleague here, FMCSA is the first line of defense on this—100 percent, they have all this information. They have everybody’s registrations and all that. And finally, I would say FMCSA needs to step back and take a long look of making the barrier of entry into being a motor carrier or a broker much harder, much stricter. We pretty much let people file for insurance, pay for it. We don’t know who these people are, have no idea if they even know what they’re doing—and maybe every 12 to 18 months, we audit them.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Chairman Wicker Leads SASC Hearing on Secretary of the Navy Nominee John Phelan

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Mississippi Roger Wicker

    WASHINGTON – U.S. Senator Roger Wicker, R-Miss., the Chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, today chaired a hearing reviewing the nomination of Mr. John Phelan to be Secretary of the Navy.

    In his opening statement, Chairman Wicker described the crisis of readiness and growth within the fleet even as the Navy receives increased budgetary support. These challenges, the Chairman argued, demand bold leadership to achieve better outcomes for U.S. naval strength.

    Chairman Wicker highlighted past naval leadership failures to address amphibious ship and submarine construction, ship repair, and an overall vision for future force structure.

    Phelan, an accomplished financier and business leader, met with Chairman Wicker in January to discuss his nomination. Read more about Chairman Wicker’s vision for the Navy here and here.

    Read Senator Wicker’s opening statement as delivered below.

    The hearing will come to order. The committee on Armed Services is meeting to consider the nomination of Mr. John Phelan to be Secretary of the Navy.

    Mr. Phelan has had a distinguished career in the private sector. His background showcases his ability to manage complex business deals to drive efficiency and to deliver results. Our Navy will need someone with all three of those skills and more to get our Navy back on the right track.

    The Navy is up against significant challenges, and the nominee before us can be a crucial part of that solution. We, also, my colleagues – need to be part of that solution.

    Congress, industry, and Navy leadership have all contributed to these problems. We must all work together to solve the issues facing us. We must begin by addressing the most urgent need – getting ship building back on track. Our sailors have performed admirably in combat operations, but Navy leadership has been unable to grow the fleet even as its budget has been increased.

    The Navy remains woefully short of the statutory requirement of 355 ships – the statutory requirement. Just about every major shipbuilding program is behind schedule, over budget, or irreparably off track. For years, we’ve seen significant delays. The failures are everywhere. Ford-class carriers, Virginia-class submarines, Constellation-class frigates all are behind schedule. Every year, the Navy shipbuilding plan promises future growth. In reality, we’ve only watched as the fleet diminished.

    In December 2020, the shipbuilding plan said the Navy would grow to 315 ships by 2025. Here we are in 2025, and we have only 287 ships. It’s clear that we have not gotten the job done. We have not gotten the job done. Together, we can work to fix that.

    We must stabilize shipbuilding programs, adopt commercial best practices, and incentivize the shipyards to address workforce and productivity issues in a collaborative, rather than combative manner. And we can quickly inject innovation into naval procurement, particularly on unmanned ships.

    The story of naval maintenance is no better than the story of shipbuilding. Our maintenance performance is unimpressive across ship classes. For just one example, last year, multiple amphibious ships were unable to deploy on time. Instead, they sat in the yards waiting for repairs. Sailors have been trained on fewer than half the required maintenance tasks and only have enough time to accomplish 40% of required maintenance. The reduced quality of recruits exacerbates the situation.

    This chain of events raises cost and creates schedule challenges for ship repair yards down the line. Deployments increase and the number of older ships decreases, sending the Navy into a death spiral.

     

    I’m painting a dismal picture, but an accurate picture.

    The Navy struggles to man the fleet. The previous administration paid too much attention to demographic traits, which contributed to the Navy’s failure to meet its recruiting goals. The Navy did eventually meet last year’s recruiting targets, but only by lowering standards. Last year, nearly 20% of Navy recruits were considered category IV – they tested below the 30th percentile on the military aptitude test – below the 30th percentile.

    Recruiting has improved significantly over the last few months, but the Navy must keep up this recruiting pace for the next three years to fill the estimated 20,000 vacancies on our ships today. Consistently deploying undermanned ships exhausts sailors and creates real operational risks, as the Navy knows all too well from its own accident investigations.

    The stakes are high. We face a threat environment more complex than any since World War II. Our Naval forces must be ready to operate in highly contested environments from the Western Pacific to the Atlantic, and from the North Sea to the Red Sea and beyond.

    The Navy’s role in our national security is more important than any moment since World War II at exactly the worst time the service has been beset with poor management and a lack of vision.

    I’m pleased with the nominee’s track record. He has rescued companies in distress. Our Navy is certainly in distress and needs that same kind of leadership.

    So, I look forward to hearing Mr. Phelan’s views about how to fix shipbuilding, maintenance, and recruitment in the Navy, and I now recognize ranking member Reed for his opening remarks.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: At Hearing, Navy Secretary Nominee Agrees with Warren that Defense Contractors’ Greed Impacts Navy’s Readiness

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Massachusetts – Elizabeth Warren

    February 27, 2025

    “We waste taxpayer dollars, delay missions. We actually put people at risk because we are not permitting basic right-to-repair. Technical data needs to be a “must have” in acquisition contracts for the Navy.” 

    Video of Exchange (YouTube) 

    Washington, D.C. – At a hearing of the Senate Armed Services Committee, U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Ranking Member of the Senate Armed Services Subcommittee on Personnel, questioned Mr. John Phelan, the nominee to be Secretary of the Navy, about his views on ensuring the Navy’s right to repair its own equipment – one of Senator Warren’s priorities. 

    Mr. Phelan agreed that examples of defense contractor restrictions on crucial repairs “do not make sense,” that the resulting delays and cost are an inefficient use of taxpayer dollars, and that they risk the Navy’s readiness. However, Mr. Phelan stopped short of committing to using his tenure as Secretary of the Navy to advance the Navy’s right to repair its own equipment. 

    Mr. Phelan said military contracts, which often include restrictions on what technical data the Navy can access to maintain and repair equipment, “really need to be reviewed,” and said he intends to focus on reviewing contracts if confirmed.

    Senator Warren highlighted existing bipartisan support on the Armed Services Committee for addressing repair restrictions and called for acquisition contracts to include access to the necessary technical data that will allow servicemembers to repair military equipment faster, more easily, and more cost-effectively. 

    Transcript: Hearing to Consider the Nomination of Mr. John C. Phelan to be Secretary of the Navy
    Senate Committee on Armed Services 
    February 27, 2025 

    Senator Elizabeth Warren: Thank you, Mr. Chairman. So, congratulations on your nomination Mr. Phelan. Let’s talk about efficiency at the Defense Department. 

    Last year, the Navy asked for $260 billion to buy everything from ships to night vision goggles. One reason it costs so much? Big defense contractors slip restrictions into their contracts that deny sailors access to technical data they need to maintain or repair equipment, even equipment that the Navy owns. 

    So, I want to give you an example. The Navy’s Littoral Combat Ships are designed to operate close to shore, to hunt mines, and to sink submarines. But this ship has been bogged down with maintenance issues. And when something breaks, sailors are not allowed to make repairs themselves because Lockheed Martin and General Dynamics don’t let them have access to the necessary data and materials. So what does the Navy do? The Navy has to fly contractors out to these ships, which Pro Publica found adds “millions of dollars in travel costs and often delays missions.” 

    So, Mr. Phelan, these kinds of extra costs and delays to fly contractors to the Pacific to fix minor repairs, are they an efficient use of taxpayer dollars? 

    Mr. John C. Phelan, nominee for Secretary of the Navy: Does not sound like it to me, Senator.  

    Senator Warren: I’m glad to hear that. Let me give you another example. The Government Accountability Office found that fuel tank level indicators were improperly calibrated on the USS Fort Lauderdale built by Huntington Ingalls. Now, it seems like an easy fix, right? You just go in and recalibrate these things. Uh uh. The Navy’s technicians were denied the information they needed to do that so every time they had to recalibrate the indicators, the Navy had to fly out one of the contractor’s technicians. 

    Mr. Phelan, does not being able to maintain important ship parts put the Navy’s readiness at risk? 

    Mr. Phelan: It sounds like it, Senator. And I think, as I mentioned earlier, these contracts are something that really need to be reviewed and better understood. And I think that, if confirmed, that is something I intend to do, is focus on that. 

    Senator Warren: And I appreciate that Mr. Phelan. But I want to see more than just reviewed here. Sailors need to be able to rely on their equipment. That means being able to maintain their own equipment. But, from fiber-optic navigation lights to cranes that deploy search and rescue boats, sailors do not have the right to repair their own equipment thanks to defense contractors who want to squeeze more money out of the military. Many people on this committee, both sides, Democrats and Republicans, understand the risk here. Chairman Wicker released a report last year showing DoD “consistently underperforms in procuring data rights,” and pointed to the lack of technical data as a factor that “inevitably leads to reduced training and readiness.” 

    Mr. Phelan, can we count on you to advance the Navy’s right to repair its own equipment? 

    Mr. Phelan: Thank you for the question, Senator. I know this is an issue very important to you. As I said, it is something that I intend to study and look at. What I’d commit to you is let me come back to you and look at this and understand it because it is a complicated issue. I am in agreement with – a lot of the examples you have given do not make sense to me but I am not up to speed enough yet to give you that answer. But I will come back and see you and commit to that and look at this. 

    Senator Warren: And I appreciate that, but I just want to say right now: this makes me uneasy. Because, there is so much pressure to continue to let these defense contractors take advantage of our service members. 

    We waste taxpayer dollars, delay missions. We actually put people at risk because we are not permitting basic right to repair. Technical data needs to be a “must have” in acquisition contracts for the Navy. My Servicemembers Right to Repair Act would make sure that the Navy and every other part of our military have fair access to the data rights and to the other materials that servicemembers need to be able to repair their own equipment and keep themselves safe. Military right-to-repair has bipartisan support here in the Senate. I want to work with the administration, I want to work with my colleagues, and I want to work with you. We owe it to our taxpayers and we owe it to the men and women in the field to get this straightened out. What’s happening right now is fundamentally wrong and we can put a stop to it. I apologize for going over, Mr. Chairman. 

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Warren, Duckworth Raise Concerns Over Potential Quid Quo Pro between Elon Musk and Dr. Troy Meink, Trump’s Air Force Secretary Nominee

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Massachusetts – Elizabeth Warren

    February 27, 2025

    Reports Indicate Musk Pushed for Meink for Key Role after Meink Favored SpaceX Contract

    “These reports raise concerns about your ability, if confirmed as Secretary, to treat contractors fairly and prioritize the Air Force’s mission over Elon Musk’s business interests.

    Text of Letter (PDF)

    Washington, D.C. – Today, U.S. Senators Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Tammy Duckworth (D-Ill.), members of the Senate Armed Services Committee, sent a letter to Dr. Troy Meink, nominee for Secretary of the Air Force, following troubling reports that Elon Musk “pushed for” and “recommended” Dr. Meink’s nomination to serve as Secretary of the Air Force after Meink favored SpaceX in a contracting deal while at the National Reconnaissance Organization.

    If Dr. Meink is confirmed to be Secretary of the Air Force, he would be responsible for key contracting, deployment, and acquisition decisions. He would also make decisions about the role of key automated technologies and space programs, mixed-use unmanned aerial vehicles, artificial intelligence, and key space programs, crucially “oversee(ing) lucrative contracts for critical space efforts where top Trump ally Elon Musk’s SpaceX dominates.” All of these decisions may have a direct impact on SpaceX, Mr. Musk’s aerospace company, and other companies owned by him.

    Reporting from Reuters suggests Dr. Meink showed favoritism towards SpaceX during his time at the National Reconnaissance Office (NRO). Space X was reportedly able to secure $2.5 billion in federal contracts while blocking bids from competitors—through a last-minute alteration Dr. Meink made to the NRO contract. When L3Harris Technologies raised concerns about changes to the contract, Dr. Meink allegedly threatened the company, saying “future business with the agency could be hurt if it filed a formal protest.”

    “SpaceX’s monopoly over NRO contracts has created a situation where ‘SpaceX is building hundreds of the satellites for the spy agency and then putting them into orbit on its own rocket,’ wrote the senators. “This type of vertical integration can ‘culminate in a de facto monopoly, cementing a stagnant and wasteful anticompetitive paradigm.’”

    “These are incredibly serious allegations of misconduct and favoritism,” the senators continued. “These reports raise concerns about your ability, if confirmed as Secretary, to treat contractors fairly and prioritize the Air Force’s mission over Elon Musk’s business interests.”

    The senators demanded answers to their concerns about his previous contracting decisions, the nature of his relationship with Mr. Musk, and his plans to engage in future contracting decisions at the Pentagon, if confirmed, by March 6, 2025. 

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Submissions: Global: Failure to consult Indigenous Peoples on future pandemics will further harm children’s education – Amnesty International

    Source: Amnesty International

    The failure of governments around the world to consult Indigenous Peoples on Covid-19 school closures and other emergency pandemic responses violated their rights, as children continue to feel the effects five years after the first global lockdown, Amnesty International said in a new report today.

    Indigenous leaders interviewed by Amnesty International for its report What If Indigenous Consent Is Not Respected?, testified to sharp and sustained increases in post-pandemic absenteeism and school dropout rates, of more than 80 per cent in some cases, among Indigenous children in more than 10 countries. Indigenous leaders and activists also voiced concerns that the often discriminatory, desultory or non-existent response by authorities to the educational needs of Indigenous children during the pandemic worsened long-standing inequities faced by Indigenous communities – with Indigenous girls and children with disabilities particularly disadvantaged. Going forward, the organization is calling for Indigenous Peoples to be consulted during future pandemics.  (ref. https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/pol40/8959/2025/en/ )

    “The Indigenous leaders and activists we spoke to felt completely ignored by governments during the pandemic, which had an enduring and damaging impact on their rights and prospects,” said Chris Chapman, Amnesty International’s Researcher on Indigenous Rights.

    “They said that remote learning solutions were often unavailable to Indigenous children. Those in rural areas, where Indigenous communities often lacked devices, internet connections, electricity and the technological knowledge or capacity to participate in virtual classes or remote learning, were worst affected.”

    When lower-tech solutions such as printed materials were distributed to other groups, Indigenous communities in several different countries said they were passed over, ignored, or asked to pay for them.

    Indigenous campaigner Sylvia Kokunda said: “For the most part these materials were distributed by the local government, since it can be easier for the village chairperson to identify the people in this community. However, local officials would not give the materials to these Batwa people, they would give only to their people.”

    Radio or television-based educational broadcasting during the pandemic was often unavailable in Indigenous languages. An Ogiek activist said that although Sogoot FM 97.1, an Ogiek language radio station, was used to reach the community to inform them about Covid-19 and its impacts, it was not used for school coursework.  

    The report is based on data and more than 80 interviews or collected responses that Amnesty International gathered to explore how Indigenous students around the world were impacted by pandemic-related school closures, including in Democratic Republic of Congo, India, Kenya, Mexico, Nepal, Russia, Taiwan and Uganda. There are 476 million Indigenous people worldwide in more than 90 countries, belonging to 5,000 different Indigenous groups and speaking more than 4,000 languages.

    Technology, discrimination and dropout rates

    Where Indigenous families had limited access to technology for remote learning during the pandemic, boys were often prioritized.

    According to Indigenous women activists from Nepal, “If some families have a mobile, then only one or two will use it. And if there are more children in the house, one has to sacrifice their education. When it comes to the sacrifice, the girls are sacrificed more.”

    Even if Indigenous students had devices capable of being used for remote learning, their families were sometimes unable to afford sufficient data. In addition, remote teaching was rarely provided in Indigenous languages.

    Children with learning difficulties or disabilities which required specialist teaching, for instance through use of sign language or braille, were often excluded, including among Indigenous communities.

    Interviewees in many states said there was often little or no government monitoring, or consideration of the effectiveness of alternative learning initiatives for Indigenous communities. Information on how to access education when schools closed – and they stayed shut for more than 18 months in some countries – was rarely provided in Indigenous languages.

    Students with little or no access to education during the pandemic often worked instead, and never returned to schools when they reopened. Those who did return when schools reopened, often found that they had fallen behind their classmates. If they were unwilling to retake a year, or could not be supported financially, they too dropped out.

    In Kenya, the majority of dropouts of Ogiek students were girls, especially girls who got pregnant during Covid-19 or were subjected to early marriage. However, it affected boys too. An Indigenous activist from Kenya said: “Boys between the ages of 12 and 18 who had begun working in jobs such as motorcycle taxi drivers or farm workers to earn money for themselves and their families also dropped out.”

    Some schools across many states never reopened, further reducing access to education for Indigenous children, Indigenous activists reported.

    Asked to reply to Amnesty’s findings, the Mexican government stated that it responded to the “unprecedented challenge of Covid-19″ by working with Indigenous schools and teachers to roll out a set of measures including distributing materials in five Indigenous languages, sometimes in printed formats where access to internet or devices was restricted, developing new digital educational materials, and capacity-building for schools and parents to use digital platforms.

    Recommendations

    “Significantly more resources are now required to safeguard, restore and improve the educational opportunities and rights of Indigenous communities,” Chris Chapman said.

    “States must work with Indigenous communities to immediately restore and enhance the right to education for all Indigenous children including a focus on re-enrolling Indigenous girls, and Indigenous students with disabilities.”  

    Alongside the report, Amnesty International has shared a guide for researchers who wish to investigate the extent to which the human right to participate effectively in decision-making has been violated, especially when it comes to Indigenous communities. (ref. https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/pol30/8958/2025/en/ )

    “Governments must consult with Indigenous Peoples on Covid-19 response measures and other pandemic and emergency response measures, otherwise they risk violating their right to consultation, and their right to give or withhold their consent to decisions affecting them. Our study highlights the risks of failing to take into account the realities, cultures and rights of Indigenous Peoples,” said Chris Chapman.

    “While our report sets out the devastating impact of this lack of inclusion, it’s hoped that Amnesty’s guide will ensure Indigenous people are included in discussions that affect them in the future. Every child has the right to free, high-quality primary education. States must therefore ensure that no child is left behind.”

    MIL OSI – Submitted News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Gillibrand Leads Effort With Senators Schumer, Blumenthal, Murphy To Reintroduce $65 Million Annual Authorization For Long Island Sound Restoration

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for New York Kirsten Gillibrand

    Today, U.S. Senators Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY), Charles E. Schumer (D-NY), Richard Blumenthal (D-CT), and Chris Murphy (D-CT) reintroduced the Long Island Sound Restoration and Stewardship Reauthorization Act. The Long Island Sound borders New York and Connecticut, with more than 20 million people living within 50 miles of the Sound’s beaches. Decades of high levels of pollution, dumping of dredged materials, and releases of untreated sewage have put the Sound’s wildlife population, fisheries, water quality, and surrounding communities at risk. The economic viability of the Sound, which contributes around $9.4 billion annually to the regional economy, is dependent on activities like sport and commercial fishing, boating, recreation, and tourism. This bill would reauthorize a total of $65 million annually for water quality and shore restoration programs.

    Passage of the Long Island Sound Restoration and Stewardship Reauthorization Act is necessary to protect one of New York’s most important natural and economic treasures,” said Senator Gillibrand.I’m leading the charge to reauthorize $65 million annually for restoration efforts that will preserve the Sound’s long-term health for generations to come.”

    “The Long Island Sound is a natural treasure and economic engine for New York that draws families, boaters, tourists, and anglers to our shores,” said Senator Schumer. “I’ve worked hard to deliver the federal funding to protect, clean up, and improve the Sound, its habitats, and beaches, but there is more work to be done. The Long Island Sound Restoration and Stewardship Reauthorization Act will authorize $65 million annually for projects that will boost the Sound’s water quality, restore its shorelines and coastal wetlands, and ensure a cleaner environment for New Yorkers for generations to come.”

    “Urgent action is needed to protect and preserve Long Island Sound – an ecological treasure home to precious wildlife,” said Senator Blumenthal. “The reauthorization of $65 million annually will support efforts to restore shore programs and improve water quality, after sewage, runoffs and other contaminants have polluted the Sound for years. I’ll continue to fight to protect Long Island Sound for nearby communities, wildlife populations, and future generations to thrive.”

    “Shoreline communities in Connecticut rely on a clean, healthy Long Island Sound. We made historic investments in its restoration over the past few years, and we can’t afford to roll back that progress. I’m glad to team up with Leader Schumer and Senators Gillibrand and Blumenthal on this bill to protect the future of the Sound,” said Senator Murphy.

    Representatives Nick LaLota (R-NY) and Joe Courtney (D-CT) introduced companion legislation in the House of Representatives. The bill is also supported by stakeholder groups in New York and Connecticut.

    “The Long Island Sound is more than just a body of water—it’s a vital part of life for communities across Suffolk County. Protecting the Sound means supporting the local economies that depend on tourism, fishing, recreation and maritime industries. That’s why I proudly introduced companion legislation to Senator Gillibrand’s bill in the House, in partnership with my colleague across the aisle and across the Sound, Congressman Courtney. This bipartisan, bicameral effort underscores our shared commitment to investing in the future of our communities, environment, and the countless people who rely on the Sound. These legislative measures will safeguard the Sound and its watershed for generations to come, reinforcing my commitment to improving the quality of life for all Long Islanders,” said Rep. Nick LaLota.

    “We are hitting the ground running in the new Congress to get the Long Island Sound Caucus’s top bipartisan priority across the finish line,” said Rep. Joe Courtney. “The Sound is a unique body of water and a powerful engine to our region’s fishing, shipbuilding, and ecotourism economies. Our bill ensures the Sound remains a valuable resource for our communities for years to come. I am confident that after the bill’s passage in the House last Congress and growing momentum in the Senate, we will once and for all send our bill to the President’s desk.”

    “In the last decade there is much progress to report in restoring Long Island Sound. Water quality has improved, the dead zone has shrunk, wetlands have been restoration,  fish passages have been created, and stormwater runoff is being filtered. We cannot stop now, we still have more to accomplish. The Long Island Sound Restoration and Stewardship Reauthorization Act is critically needed to continue progress and ensure a healthy Sound for future generations. The Sound is an extension of our backyards, a gem that is beloved by millions of people. Thank you to Senator Gillibrand for her continued support championing protection for the Sound,” said Adrienne Esposito, Executive Director, Citizens Campaign for the Environment.  

    “With its 1,194 square miles and over 23 million people living within fifty miles of its shorelines, Long Island Sound has served as a major economic driver for our local economies, estimated to exceed $10 Billion per year. The health of the Sound is critical to our economy, to the wildlife that inhabit it, and to the people who enjoy it. Over the past 20 years, the improved health of the Sound was made possible through projects funded by the bi-state and bipartisan Long Island Sound Restoration and Stewardship Act. Since this Act expired at the end of 2024, it is critical that Congress reauthorize this bill and fund it at the authorized level of $65 million per year,” said Eric Swenson, Executive Director, Hempstead Harbor Protection Committee.

    “Communities in Connecticut and New York depend on Long Island Sound for a vibrant economy as people near and far spend time here swimming, boating, fishing, and enjoying great seafood. Sustaining the Long Island Sound Restoration and Stewardship Act enables everyone to work together for clean, healthy water and natural resources, which supports jobs around the region. A clean, resilient Long Island Sound is also essential to preserving populations of local plants and wildlife in the water and along the coastline,” saidHolly Drinkuth, Director of River and Estuary Conservation, The Nature Conservancy in CT.

    “The continuation of efforts to preserve and restore the Long Island Sound depends on our youth. At Project Oceanology we raise students’ collective understanding of the vulnerability of the marine environment and what they can do to protect it. Our hands-on experiential educational programs are delivered on the waters and shorelines of the Sound. We integrate ocean literacy principles and Next Generation Science Standards into K-12 education. Since our founding in 1972 we have provided over one million participants including students, summer campers, teachers, and the public first hand opportunities to explore, learn, and take action,” said Andrew Ely, Executive Director of Project Oceanology.

    “We are grateful to Senator Gillibrand and co-sponsors Senate Democratic Leader Schumer from New York and Senators Blumenthal and Murphy from Connecticut—for prioritizing the reauthorization of critical funding for clean water and restoration programs that protect and restore the health of Long Island Sound,” said Denise Stranko, executive vice president of programs for Save the Sound. “To reintroduce this bill this early in the new session demonstrates the leadership and commitment of our legislators from the Long Island Sound region, who have continued to champion this essential legislation and the important work it supports.” 

    “Investment in Long Island Sound is critical to the health of our communities,” said the Maritime Aquarium at Norwalk Director of Conservation and Policy Dr. Sarah Crosby. “At The Maritime Aquarium, this investment is directly funding research that will inform restoration strategy and increase resilience of our salt marshes–ecosystems that protect coastlines from the devastating effects of hurricanes. We are grateful to Senators Gillibrand, Schumer, Blumenthal and Murphy, as well as Representatives LaLota and Courtney, for their unwavering support of Long Island Sound’s habitats and wildlife.”

    “The Long Island Sound Restoration and Stewardship Reauthorization Act is absolutely critical to the health and sustainability of the Sound as well as the prosperity of our coastal communities. On Long Island, the environment is the economy, and we commend and thank Senator Gillibrand and her fellow lawmakers for leading this charge and looking out for New Yorkers,” said Julie Tighe, President of the New York League of Conservation Voters. 

    In 1985, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), in agreement with New York and Connecticut, created the Long Island Sound Study (LISS), a partnership charged with advancing efforts to restore the Sound and address low oxygen levels and excess nitrogen levels that have depleted fish and shellfish populations as well as hurt shoreline wetlands. In 1990, the Long Island Sound Improvement Act was passed, providing federal dollars to advance Sound cleanup projects, including wastewater treatment improvements.

    In 2006, Congress passed the Long Island Sound Stewardship Act, which provided federal dollars for projects to restore the coastal habitat to help revitalize the wildlife population, coastal wetlands, and plant life. In 2018, Senator Gillibrand’s Long Island Sound Restoration and Stewardship Act, which combined and reauthorized the two complementary water quality and habitat restoration programs, was enacted as a part of the America’s Water Infrastructure Act of 2018. As of 2022, federal funding for the Long Island Sound had enabled programs to significantly reduce the amount of nitrogen entering the Long Island Sound from sewage treatment plants by 70.3% compared to the 1990s, reduce hypoxic conditions by 58% compared to the 1990s, restore at least 2,239 acres of coastal habitat, and fund 570 conservation projects.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Address at the Royal Australian Mint 60th anniversary, Canberra

    Source: Australian Treasurer

    I acknowledge the Ngunnawal people on whose lands we meet today, and all First Nations people present. Thank you, and welcome to the voice of Trixie Heeler, Myf Warhurst. It’s wonderful to have you as part of this special occasion.

    A big thank you to the Royal Australian Mint and Acting CEO Emily Martin for hosting this event, and to all of you – coin collectors, visitors, Mint staff, and Canberrans – for being here today.

    Today, we celebrate 60 years of the Royal Australian Mint—a milestone that reflects not only the passage of time but also the evolution of our nation’s currency, craftsmanship, and innovation.

    The story of Australian coinage is one of transformation and progress. When the Mint opened its doors in 1965, Australia was on the cusp of a historic shift – from the familiar imperial system of pounds, shillings, and pence to a modern decimal currency.

    Proposals to adopt decimal currency emerged shortly after Federation, but it was not until Leslie Melville’s 1957 Decimal Currency Council report that momentum began. The new Currency Act was enacted in 1963, and the public were asked what to call the new currency. Suggested names included ‘Austral’, ‘Oz’, ‘Boomer’, ‘Emu’, ‘Deci‑mate’, ‘Kwid’, ‘Kanga’, ‘Digger’, ‘Dinkum’ and ‘Roo’. Some rue the fact that we eventually went with ‘dollar’.

    The switch to decimal currency was a national effort, one that required education, precision, and trust – all embodied in the very coins produced within these walls.

    Befitting the romantic approach of the Mint, Valentine’s Day 1966 was chosen for the changeover, and public education campaigns began. One jingle was sung by a character dubbed ‘Dollar Bill’ to the tune of the folk song ‘Click Go the Shears’:

    In come the dollars and in come the cents
    To replace the pounds and the shillings and the pence.
    Be prepared folks when the coins begin to mix
    On the 14th of February 1966.

    I wasn’t born until the following decade, but the Mint’s jingle was such an effective earworm that my parents often sang it to my brother and me as young children.

    Handling 2 currencies wasn’t easy. Many shopkeepers had conversion charts behind the counter, and there were humorous moments as Australians adjusted. One story, possibly apocryphal, is of a man who walked into a bar a few weeks after the introduction of decimal currency and attempted to pay for his drink using a mixture of new and old coins. The bartender, flummoxed by the mix of pence and cents, apparently decided it was easier to give the bloke his drink on the house.

    The designer who gave these coins their first distinct character was Stuart Devlin, a Melbourne‑born artist and silversmith. His designs, chosen through a national competition, brought our native wildlife to life on the 1, 2, 5, 10, 20, and 50‑cent pieces. The bounding kangaroo, the spiky echidna, and the playful platypus became symbols of Australian pride. Devlin’s artistry set a benchmark for numismatic design, and his influence continues to be felt in the coins produced by the Mint today.

    The history of Australian currency stretches back well before decimalisation. Before the Mint’s founding, before Federation, before European settlement, different forms of exchange shaped our economy. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people engaged in sophisticated barter systems, trading goods such as ochre, shell, and tools across vast distances. The earliest colonial transactions were conducted with rum, promissory notes, and an eclectic mix of foreign coins before the establishment of our first official currency. Today, the Mint serves as the custodian of the National Coin Collection, preserving these stories and artefacts so future generations can walk through history – not just since 1965, but from our nation’s earliest days.

    The Mint has also played a key role in preserving Australia’s military history through commemorative coin releases. From ANZAC Day coins to the first coloured red poppy coin in 2012, released in partnership with the RSL to commemorate the wartime sacrifice of Australian service personnel, these pieces honour our nation’s service and sacrifice. During World War II, Australia faced severe coin shortages and had to mint coins in the USA and India. This experience reinforced the need for a sovereign minting facility, leading to the foundation of the Royal Australian Mint.

    The Mint’s work has never been confined to our own shores. Over the decades, it has become a respected global producer, currently supplying coins to 7 nations in the Asia‑Pacific. This international role highlights the skill and reputation of the Mint and has supported the economies of many countries, reinforcing Australia’s standing in the numismatic world.

    This global reputation for craftsmanship and innovation has positioned the Royal Australian Mint as more than just a manufacturer – it is a creator of currency that tells a story. Each coin it produces carries history in its design, whether celebrating our culture, achievements, or aspirations.

    Coins don’t just mark history—they make history. We’ve seen that most recently with the transition of the effigy on our coinage. For more than 70 years, coins in Australia bore the right‑facing portrait of Queen Elizabeth II, evolving through 6 different designs as her reign progressed. Then, in October 2023, in this very building, I had the honour of unveiling the left‑facing effigy of King Charles III. It was the first change in monarch on our coins since decimalisation – a reminder that history is reflected in the coins we carry in our pockets.

    Looking ahead, the future of coins is a subject of great interest. The rise of digital payments has led some to question their place in modern society. Yet, coins continue to hold cultural, historical, and collectible value. Some of Australia’s most collectible coins, such as the rare 1930 penny, fetch tens of thousands at auction. Error coins, such as the famous 2000 $1 ‘mule’ coin, which was mistakenly struck with a 10c die, remain highly sought after.

    The Mint has adapted to technological advancements, from new minting techniques to sustainable materials, ensuring that Australian coins remain relevant in an evolving world. The introduction of coloured and uniquely shaped coins demonstrates the Mint’s continuous innovation.

    Today, as we reflect on the past 6 decades, we acknowledge the skill, dedication, and vision of those who have contributed to the Royal Australian Mint’s success. From its first decimal coins to its latest commemorative releases, this institution has helped shape the way Australians interact with their currency, history and culture. It has been more than a manufacturer of money – it has been a storyteller, an innovator, and a guardian of tradition.

    Coins of the future will evolve in design, composition, and possibly even purpose. But one thing remains certain – the Royal Australian Mint will continue to play a defining role in Australia’s numismatic legacy. Happy 60th anniversary.

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI: CORRECTION – Global Net Lease Reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2024 Results

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    In a release issued under the same headline earlier today by Global Net Lease, Inc. (NYSE: GNL), please note that in the Full Year 2025 Guidance and Dividend Update section, the third bullet should read “Reduced quarterly dividend…” and not “Reduced annual dividend…” as previously stated. The corrected release is as follows:

    –  Completed $835 Million in Dispositions in 2024, Surpassing High-End of Increased Guidance

    –  Reduced Net Debt by $734 million in 2024; Improved Net Debt to Adjusted EBITDA to 7.6x

    –  Company Meets and Exceeds its Full-Year 2024 Earnings Guidance

    –  Recently Announced $1.8 Billion Multi-Tenant Portfolio Sale Would Significantly Reduce Leverage and Improve Liquidity Position

    –  Proposed Transaction Would Create Pure-Play, Single-Tenant Net Lease Company with Enhanced Portfolio Metrics

    –  Company Initiates Opportunistic $300 Million Share Repurchase Program

    NEW YORK, Feb. 27, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Global Net Lease, Inc. (NYSE: GNL) (“GNL” or the “Company”), an internally managed real estate investment trust that focuses on acquiring and managing a globally diversified portfolio of strategically-located commercial real estate properties, announced today its financial and operating results for the quarter and year ended December 31, 2024.

    Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2024 Highlights

    • Revenue was $199.1 million in fourth quarter 2024 compared to $206.7 million in fourth quarter 2023, primarily as a result of $835 million of dispositions closed throughout the year
    • Net loss attributable to common stockholders was $17.5 million in fourth quarter 2024, compared to $59.5 million in fourth quarter 2023
    • Core Funds From Operations (“Core FFO”) was $68.5 million, or $0.30 per share, in fourth quarter 2024, compared to $48.3 million, or $0.21 per share, in fourth quarter 2023
    • Adjusted Funds From Operations (“AFFO”)1 was $78.3 million2, or $0.34 per share, in fourth quarter 2024, compared to $71.7 million, or $0.31 per share, in fourth quarter 2023; full-year 2024 AFFO was $303.8 million, or $1.32 per share
    • Closed $835 million of dispositions in 2024 at a cash cap rate of 7.1% with a weighted average lease term of 4.9 years
    • Reduced net debt by $734 million in 2024, improving Net Debt to Adjusted EBITDA from 8.4x to 7.6x2
    • Exceeded projected cost synergies, reaching $85.0 million versus the expected $75.0 million, highlighting the Company’s successful integration efforts and ability to drive value through strategic initiatives
    • Increased portfolio occupancy from 93% as of the end of first quarter 2024 to 97% as of the end of the fourth quarter of 2024
    • Leased 1.2 million square feet across the portfolio, resulting in nearly $17.0 million of new straight-line rent
    • Renewal leasing spread of 6.8% with a weighted average lease term of 9.7 years; new leases completed in the quarter had a weighted average lease term of 6.5 years
    • Weighted average annual rent increase of 1.3% provides organic rental growth, excluding 14.8% of the portfolio with CPI linked leases that have historically experienced significantly higher rental increase
    • Sector-leading 61% of annualized straight-line rent comes from investment-grade or implied investment-grade tenants3

    Multi-Tenant Portfolio Sale

    • Entered into a binding agreement to sell its multi-tenant portfolio of 100 non-core properties for approximately $1.8 billion
    • This strategic transaction would accelerate GNL’s disposition initiative and position the Company for sustained growth and value creation as a pure-play, single-tenant net lease company

    “We are incredibly proud of our achievements at GNL in 2024 and even more excited about what lies ahead,” stated Michael Weil, CEO of GNL. “The sale of our multi-tenant portfolio would mark a pivotal moment, reinforcing the strong momentum we have built. This transaction would reshape GNL into a pure-play, single-tenant net lease company, eliminating the operational complexities, G&A expenses and capital expenditures tied to multi-tenant retail properties. More importantly, it would accelerate our deleveraging strategy and fortify our balance sheet. This strategic transformation, including the recently announced share repurchase program, underscores our long-term vision, reinforcing our commitment to prudent management, sustainable growth and driving meaningful shareholder value.”

    Full Year 2025 Guidance and Dividend Update4
    The Company is establishing initial 2025 guidance, which is contingent on the sale of our multi-tenant portfolio with respect to AFFO and Net Debt to Adjusted EBITDA.

    • AFFO per share range of $0.90 to $0.96
    • Net Debt to Adjusted EBITDA range of 6.5x to 7.1x
    • Reduced quarterly dividend to $0.190 per share of common stock beginning with the dividend expected to be declared in April 2025 which would generate $78 million in incremental annual cash flow

    Summary Fourth Quarter 2024 Results

        Three Months Ended
    December 31,

     
    (In thousands, except per share data)   2024   2023  
    Revenue from tenants   $ 199,115     $ 206,726    
                       
    Net loss attributable to common stockholders   $ (17,458 )   $ (59,514 )  
    Net loss per diluted common share   $ (0.08 )   $ (0.26 )  
                       
    NAREIT defined FFO attributable to common stockholders   $ 64,334     $ 43,165    
    NAREIT defined FFO per diluted common share   $ 0.28     $ 0.19    
                       
    Core FFO attributable to common stockholders   $ 68,538     $ 48,331    
    Core FFO per diluted common share   $ 0.30     $ 0.21    
                       
    AFFO attributable to common stockholders   $ 78,297     $ 71,656    
    AFFO per diluted common share   $ 0.34     $ 0.31    
     

    Property Portfolio

    At December 31, 2024, the Company’s portfolio consisted of 1,121 net leased properties located in ten countries and territories and comprised of 60.7 million rentable square feet. The Company operates in four reportable segments: (1) Industrial & Distribution, (2) Multi-Tenant Retail, (3) Single-Tenant Retail and (4) Office. The real estate portfolio metrics include:

    • 97% leased with a remaining weighted-average lease term of 6.2 years5
    • 81% of the portfolio contains contractual rent increases based on annualized straight-line rent
    • 61% of portfolio annualized straight-line rent derived from investment grade and implied investment grade rated tenants
    • 80% U.S. and Canada, 20% Europe (based on annualized straight-line rent)
    • 34% Industrial & Distribution, 28% Multi-Tenant Retail, 21% Single-Tenant Retail and 17% Office (based on an annualized straight-line rent)

    Capital Structure and Liquidity Resources6

    As of December 31, 2024, the Company had liquidity of $492.2 million and $460.0 million of capacity under the Company’s revolving credit facility. The Company had net debt of $4.6 billion7, including $2.3 billion of mortgage debt.

    As of December 31, 2024, the percentage of debt that is fixed rate (including variable rate debt fixed with swaps) was 91%, compared to approximately 80% as of December 31, 2023. The Company’s total combined debt had a weighted average interest rate of 4.8% resulting in an interest coverage ratio of 2.5 times8. Weighted average debt maturity was 3.0 years as of December 31, 2024 as compared to 3.2 years as of December 31, 2023.

    Footnotes/Definitions

    1 While we consider AFFO a useful indicator of our performance, we do not consider AFFO as an alternative to net income (loss) or as a measure of liquidity. Furthermore, other REITs may define AFFO differently than we do. Projected AFFO per share data included in this release is for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon as indicative of future dividends or as a measure of future liquidity. AFFO for the fourth quarter 2024 also contains a number of adjustments for items that the Company believes were non-recurring, one-time items including adjustments for items that were settled in cash such as merger and proxy related expenses.
       
    2 Includes the collection of $4.5 million in past-due funds from Children of America and approximately $3.0 million in termination fees.
       
    3 As used herein, “Investment Grade Rating” includes both actual investment grade ratings of the tenant or guarantor, if available, or implied investment grade. Implied Investment Grade may include actual ratings of tenant parent, guarantor parent (regardless of whether or not the parent has guaranteed the tenant’s obligation under the lease) or by using a proprietary Moody’s analytical tool, which generates an implied rating by measuring a company’s probability of default. The term “parent” for these purposes includes any entity, including any governmental entity, owning more than 50% of the voting stock in a tenant. Ratings information is as of December 31, 2024. Comprised of 31.4% leased to tenants with an actual investment grade rating and 29.1% leased to tenants with an Implied Investment Grade rating based on annualized cash rent as of December 31, 2024.
       
    4 We do not provide guidance on net income. We only provide guidance on AFFO per share and our Net Debt to Adjusted EBITDA ratio and do not provide reconciliations of this forward-looking non-GAAP guidance to net income per share or our debt to net income due to the inherent difficulty in quantifying certain items necessary to provide such reconciliations as a result of their unknown effect, timing and potential significance. Examples of such items include impairment of assets, gains and losses from sales of assets, and depreciation and amortization from new acquisitions and other non-recurring expenses.
       
    5 Weighted-average remaining lease term in years is based on square feet as of December 31, 2024.
       
    6 During the year ended December 31, 2024, the Company did not sell any shares of Common Stock or Series B Preferred Stock through its Common Stock or Series B Preferred Stock under its “at-the-market” programs.
       
    7 Comprised of the principal amount of GNL’s outstanding debt totaling $4.7 billion less cash and cash equivalents totaling $159.7 million, as of December 31, 2024.
       
    8 The interest coverage ratio is calculated by dividing adjusted EBITDA for the applicable quarter by cash paid for interest (calculated based on the interest expense less non-cash portion of interest expense and amortization of mortgage (discount) premium, net). Management believes that interest coverage ratio is a useful supplemental measure of our ability to service our debt obligations. Adjusted EBITDA and cash paid for interest are Non-GAAP metrics and are reconciled below.
     

    Conference Call 

    GNL will host a webcast and conference call on February 28, 2025 at 11:00 a.m. ET to discuss its financial and operating results. 

    To listen to the live call, please go to GNL’s “Investor Relations” section of the website at least 15 minutes prior to the start of the call to register and download any necessary audio software.

    Dial-in instructions for the conference call and the replay are outlined below.

    Conference Call Details

    Live Call

    Dial-In (Toll Free): 1-877-407-0792
    International Dial-In: 1-201-689-8263

    Conference Replay

    For those who are not able to listen to the live broadcast, a replay will be available shortly after the call on the GNL website at www.globalnetlease.com.

    Or dial-in below:

    Domestic Dial-In (Toll Free): 1-844-512-2921
    International Dial-In: 1-412-317-6671
    Conference Number: 13746750
    *Available from 2:00 p.m. ET on February 28, 2025 through May 28, 2025.

    Supplemental Schedules 

    The Company will file supplemental information packages with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) to provide additional disclosure and financial information. Once posted, the supplemental package can be found under the “Presentations” tab in the Investor Relations section of GNL’s website at www.globalnetlease.com and on the SEC website at www.sec.gov. 

    About Global Net Lease, Inc. 

    Global Net Lease, Inc. (NYSE: GNL) is a publicly traded internally managed real estate investment trust that focuses on acquiring and managing a global portfolio of income producing net lease assets across the U.S., and Western and Northern Europe. Additional information about GNL can be found on its website at www.globalnetlease.com. 

    Forward-Looking Statements

    The statements in this press release that are not historical facts may be forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties that could cause the outcome to be materially different. The words such as “may,” “will,” “seeks,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “expects,” “estimates,” “projects,” “potential,” “predicts,” “plans,” “intends,” “would,” “could,” “should” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking statements contain these identifying words. These forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are outside of the Company’s control, which could cause actual results to differ materially from the results contemplated by the forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties include the risks that any potential future acquisition or disposition (including the multi-tenant portfolio sale) by the Company is subject to market conditions, capital availability and timing considerations and may not be identified or completed on favorable terms, or at all. Some of the risks and uncertainties, although not all risks and uncertainties, that could cause the Company’s actual results to differ materially from those presented in the Company’s forward-looking statements are set forth in the “Risk Factors” and “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk” sections in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, its Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, and all of its other filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, as such risks, uncertainties and other important factors may be updated from time to time in the Company’s subsequent reports. Further, forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and the Company undertakes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statement to reflect changed assumptions, the occurrence of unanticipated events or changes to future operating results over time, unless required by law.

    Contacts: 

    Investors and Media:
    Email: investorrelations@globalnetlease.com
    Phone: (332) 265-2020

    Global Net Lease, Inc.
    Consolidated Balance Sheets
    (In thousands)
     
      December 31,
     
      2024   2023  
    ASSETS (Unaudited)
             
    Real estate investments, at cost:                
    Land $ 1,172,146     $ 1,430,607    
    Buildings, fixtures and improvements   5,293,468       5,842,314    
    Construction in progress   4,350       23,242    
    Acquired intangible lease assets   1,057,967       1,359,981    
     Total real estate investments, at cost   7,527,931       8,656,144    
     Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization   (1,164,629 )     (1,083,824 )  
       Total real estate investments, net   6,363,302       7,572,320    
    Assets held for sale   17,406       3,188    
    Cash and cash equivalents   159,698       121,566    
    Restricted cash   64,510       40,833    
    Derivative assets, at fair value   2,471       10,615    
    Unbilled straight-line rent   99,501       84,254    
    Operating lease right-of-use asset   74,270       77,008    
    Prepaid expenses and other assets   108,562       121,997    
    Deferred tax assets   4,866       4,808    
    Goodwill   51,370       46,976    
    Deferred financing costs, net   9,808       15,412    
              Total Assets $ 6,955,764     $ 8,098,977    
                     
    LIABILITIES AND EQUITY                
    Mortgage notes payable, net $ 2,221,706     $ 2,517,868    
    Revolving credit facility   1,390,292       1,744,182    
    Senior notes, net   906,101       886,045    
    Acquired intangible lease liabilities, net   76,800       95,810    
    Derivative liabilities, at fair value   3,719       5,145    
    Accounts payable and accrued expenses   75,735       99,014    
    Operating lease liability   48,333       48,369    
    Prepaid rent   28,734       46,213    
    Deferred tax liability   5,477       6,009    
    Dividends payable   11,909       11,173    
        Total Liabilities   4,768,806       5,459,828    
    Commitments and contingencies            
    Stockholders’ Equity:                
    7.25% Series A cumulative redeemable preferred stock   68       68    
    6.875% Series B cumulative redeemable perpetual preferred stock   47       47    
    7.50% Series D cumulative redeemable perpetual preferred stock   79       79    
    7.375% Series E cumulative redeemable perpetual preferred stock   46       46    
    Common stock   3,640       3,639    
    Additional paid-in capital   4,359,264       4,350,112    
    Accumulated other comprehensive loss   (25,844 )     (14,096 )  
    Accumulated deficit   (2,150,342 )     (1,702,143 )  
    Total Stockholders’ Equity   2,186,958       2,637,752    
    Non-controlling interest         1,397    
    Total Equity   2,186,958       2,639,149    
             Total Liabilities and Equity $ 6,955,764     $ 8,098,977    
     
    Global Net Lease, Inc.
    Consolidated Statements of Operations
    (In thousands, except per share data)
     
      Three Months Ended   Year Ended
     
      December 31,
    2024
      December 31,
    2023
      December 31,
    2024
      December 31,
    2023

     
      (Unaudited)    (Unaudited)    (Unaudited)           
    Revenue from tenants $ 199,115     $ 206,726     $ 805,010     $ 515,070    
                                     
    Expenses:                                
    Property operating   35,619       37,037       142,497       67,839    
    Operating fees to related parties         (580 )           28,283    
    Impairment charges   20,098       2,978       90,410       68,684    
    Merger, transaction and other costs   1,792       4,349       6,026       54,492    
    Settlement costs                     29,727    
    General and administrative   13,763       16,867       57,734       40,187    
    Equity-based compensation   2,309       1,058       8,931       17,297    
    Depreciation and amortization   83,020       98,713       349,943       222,271    
    Total expenses   156,601       160,422       655,541       528,780    
          Operating income (loss) before gain on dispositions of
                real estate investments
      42,514       46,304       149,469       (13,710 )  
    Gain (loss) on dispositions of real estate investments   21,326       (988 )     57,015       (1,672 )  
          Operating income (loss)   63,840       45,316       206,484       (15,382 )  
    Other income (expense):                                
    Interest expense   (77,234 )     (83,575 )     (326,932 )     (179,411 )  
    Loss on extinguishment and modification of debt   (2,412 )     (817 )     (15,877 )     (1,221 )  
    Gain (loss) on derivative instruments   6,853       (4,478 )     4,229       (3,691 )  
    Unrealized gains on undesignated foreign currency advances and
          other hedge ineffectiveness
      1,917             3,249          
    Other income   1,476       435       1,720       2,270    
    Total other expense, net   (69,400 )     (88,435 )     (333,611 )     (182,053 )  
    Net loss before income tax   (5,560 )     (43,119 )     (127,127 )     (197,435 )  
    Income tax expense   (962 )     (5,459 )     (4,445 )     (14,475 )  
    Net loss   (6,522 )     (48,578 )     (131,572 )     (211,910 )  
    Preferred stock dividends   (10,936 )     (10,936 )     (43,744 )     (27,438 )  
    Net loss attributable to common stockholders $ (17,458 )   $ (59,514 )   $ (175,316 )   $ (239,348 )  
                                     
    Basic and Diluted Loss Per Share:                                
    Net loss per share attributable to common stockholders — Basic
          and Diluted
    $ (0.08 )   $ (0.26 )   $ (0.76 )   $ (1.71 )  
    Weighted Average Shares Outstanding:                                
    Basic and Diluted   230,596       230,320       230,440       142,584    
     
    Global Net Lease, Inc.
    Quarterly Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures (Unaudited)
    (In thousands)
       
        Three Months Ended   Year Ended
     
        March 31,
    2024
      June 30,
    2024
      September 30,
    2024
      December 31,
    2024
      December 31,
    2024

     
    Adjusted EBITDA                                        
      Net loss $ (23,751 )   $ (35,664 )   $ (65,635 )   $ (6,522 )   $ (131,572 )  
      Depreciation and amortization   92,000       89,493       85,430       83,020       349,943    
      Interest expense   82,753       89,815       77,130       77,234       326,932    
      Income tax expense   2,388       (250 )     1,345       962       4,445    
      EBITDA   153,390       143,394       98,270       154,694       549,748    
      Impairment charges   4,327       27,402       38,583       20,098       90,410    
      Equity-based compensation   1,973       2,340       2,309       2,309       8,931    
      Merger, transaction and other costs [1]   761       1,572       1,901       1,792       6,026    
      (Gain) loss on dispositions of real estate investments   (5,867 )     (34,102 )     4,280       (21,326 )     (57,015 )  
      (Gain) loss on derivative instruments   (1,588 )     (530 )     4,742       (6,853 )     (4,229 )  
      Unrealized gains on undesignated foreign currency
          advances and other hedge ineffectiveness
      (1,032 )     (300 )           (1,917 )     (3,249 )  
      Loss on extinguishment and modification of debt   58       13,090       317       2,412       15,877    
      Other expense (income)   16       (309 )     49       (1,476 )     (1,720 )  
      Expenses attributable to European tax restructuring [2]   469       16                   485    
      Transition costs related to the Merger and Internalization [3]   2,826       995       138       527       4,486    
      Adjusted EBITDA   155,333       153,568       150,589       150,260       609,750    
      General and administrative   16,177       15,196       12,598       13,763       57,734    
      Expenses attributable to European tax restructuring [2]   (469 )     (16 )                 (485 )  
      Transition costs related to the Merger and Internalization [3]   (2,826 )     (995 )     (138 )     (527 )     (4,486 )  
      NOI   168,215       167,753       163,049       163,496       662,513    
      Amortization related to above- and below-market lease
          intangibles and right-of-use assets, net
      2,225       1,901       1,805       1,572       7,503    
      Straight-line rent   (4,562 )     (5,349 )     (5,343 )     (3,896 )     (19,150 )  
      Cash NOI $ 165,878     $ 164,305     $ 159,511     $ 161,172     $ 650,866    
                                               
    Cash Paid for Interest:                                        
      Interest Expense $ 82,753     $ 89,815     $ 77,130     $ 77,234     $ 326,932    
            Non-cash portion of interest expense   (2,394 )     (2,580 )     (2,496 )     (2,510 )     (9,980 )  
      Amortization of discounts on mortgages and senior notes   (15,338 )     (24,080 )     (14,156 )     (15,017 )     (68,591 )  
      Total cash paid for interest $ 65,021     $ 63,155     $ 60,478     $ 59,707     $ 248,361    
                                               
    [1] These costs primarily consist of advisory, legal and other professional costs that were directly related to the Merger and Internalization.
    [2] Amounts relate to costs incurred related to the tax restructuring of our European entities. We do not consider these expenses to be part of our normal operating performance and have, accordingly, increased Adjusted EBITDA for these amounts.
    [3] Amounts include costs related to (i) compensation incurred for our former Co-Chief Executive Officer who retired effective March 31, 2024; (ii) a transition service agreement with the former Advisor and; (iii) insurance premiums related to expiring directors and officers insurance of former RTL directors. We do not consider these expenses to be part of our normal operating performance and have, accordingly, increased Adjusted EBITDA for these amounts.
       
    Global Net Lease, Inc.
    Quarterly Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures (Unaudited)
    (In thousands, except per share data)
       
        Three Months Ended   Year Ended
     
        March 31,
    2024
      June 30,
    2024
      September 30,
    2024
      December 31,
    2024
      December 31,
    2024

     
    Funds from operations (FFO):                                        
      Net loss attributable to common stockholders (in accordance with GAAP) $ (34,687 )   $ (46,600 )   $ (76,571 )   $ (17,458 )   $ (175,316 )  
      Impairment charges   4,327       27,402       38,583       20,098       90,410    
      Depreciation and amortization   92,000       89,493       85,430       83,020       349,943    
      (Gain) loss on dispositions of real estate investments   (5,867 )     (34,102 )     4,280       (21,326 )     (57,015 )  
    FFO (defined by NAREIT)   55,773       36,193       51,722       64,334       208,022    
      Merger, transaction and other costs[1]   761       1,572       1,901       1,792       6,026    
      Loss on extinguishment and modification of debt   58       13,090       317       2,412       15,877    
    Core FFO attributable to common stockholders   56,592       50,855       53,940       68,538       229,925    
      Non-cash equity-based compensation   1,973       2,340       2,309       2,309       8,931    
      Non-cash portion of interest expense   2,394       2,580       2,496       2,510       9,980    
      Amortization related to above- and below-market lease intangibles and right-of-use assets, net   2,225       1,901       1,805       1,572       7,503    
      Straight-line rent   (4,562 )     (5,349 )     (5,343 )     (3,896 )     (19,150 )  
      Unrealized gains on undesignated foreign currency advances and other hedge ineffectiveness   (1,032 )     (300 )           (1,917 )     (3,249 )  
      Eliminate unrealized (gains) losses on foreign currency transactions[2]   (1,259 )     (230 )     4,360       (6,289 )     (3,418 )  
      Amortization of discounts on mortgages and senior notes   15,338       24,080       14,156       15,017       68,591    
      Expenses attributable to European tax restructuring[3]   469       16                   485    
      Transition costs related to the Merger and Internalization[4]   2,826       995       138       527       4,486    
      Forfeited disposition deposit[5]         (196 )     (5 )     (74 )     (275 )  
    Adjusted funds from operations (AFFO) attributable tocommon stockholders $ 74,964     $ 76,692     $ 73,856     $ 78,297     $ 303,809    
    Weighted average common shares outstanding – Basic and Diluted   230,320       230,381       230,463       230,596       230,440    
    Net loss per share attributable to common shareholders — Basic and Diluted $ (0.15 )   $ (0.20 )   $ (0.33 )   $ (0.08 )   $ (0.76 )  
    FFO per diluted common share $ 0.24     $ 0.16     $ 0.22     $ 0.28     $ 0.90    
    Core FFO per diluted common share $ 0.25     $ 0.22     $ 0.23     $ 0.30     $ 1.00    
    AFFO per diluted common share $ 0.33     $ 0.33     $ 0.32     $ 0.34     $ 1.32    
    Dividends declared to common stockholders $ 81,923     $ 63,754     $ 63,722     $ 63,484     $ 272,883    
                                               
    [1] These costs primarily consist of advisory, legal and other professional costs that were directly related to the Merger and Internalization.
    [2] For the three months ended March 31, 2024, the gain on derivative instruments was $1.6 million which consisted of unrealized gains of $1.3 million and realized gains of $0.3 million. For the three months ended June 30, 2024, the gain on derivative instruments was $0.5 million which consisted of unrealized gains of $0.2 million and realized gains of $0.3 million. For the three months ended September 30, 2024, the loss on derivative instruments was $4.7 million which consisted of unrealized losses of $4.4 million and realized losses of $0.3 million. For the three months ended December 31, 2024, the gain on derivative instruments was $6.9 million, which consisted of unrealized gains of $6.3 million and realized gains of $0.6 million. For the year ended December 31, 2024, the gain on derivative instruments was $4.2 million, which consisted of unrealized gains of $3.4 million and realized gains of $0.8 million.
    [3] Amounts relate to costs incurred related to the tax restructuring of our European entities. We do not consider these expenses to be part of our normal operating performance and have, accordingly, increased AFFO for these amounts.
    [4] Amounts include costs related to (i) compensation incurred for our former Co-Chief Executive Officer who retired effective March 31, 2024; (ii) a transition service agreement with the former Advisor and; (iii) insurance premiums related to expiring directors and officers insurance of former RTL directors. We do not consider these expenses to be part of our normal operating performance and have, accordingly, increased AFFO for these amounts.
    [5] Represents a forfeited deposit from a potential buyer of one of our properties, which is recorded in other income in our consolidated statement of operations. We do not consider this income to be part of our normal operating performance and have, accordingly, decreased AFFO for this amount.
       

    The following table provides operating financial information for the Company’s four reportable segments:

          Three Months Ended December 31,   Year Ended December 31,
     
    (In thousands)   2024   2023 (1)   2024   2023 (1)
     
    Industrial & Distribution:                          
      Revenue from tenants   $ 54,561   $ 62,223   $ 237,645   $ 220,102  
      Property operating expense     6,694     5,407     21,820     15,457  
      Net operating income   $ 47,867   $ 56,816   $ 215,825   $ 204,645  
                                 
    Multi-Tenant Retail:                          
      Revenue from tenants   $ 63,131   $ 66,412   $ 259,280   $ 79,799  
      Property operating expense     20,387     22,494     86,025     26,951  
      Net operating income   $ 42,744   $ 43,918   $ 173,255   $ 52,848  
                                 
    Single-Tenant Retail:                          
      Revenue from tenants   $ 42,648   $ 41,288   $ 164,514   $ 65,478  
      Property operating expense     4,012     4,286     15,787     6,045  
      Net operating income   $ 38,636   $ 37,002   $ 148,727   $ 59,433  
                                 
    Office:                          
      Revenue from tenants   $ 38,775   $ 36,803   $ 143,571   $ 149,691  
      Property operating expense     4,526     4,850     18,865     19,386  
      Net operating income   $ 34,249   $ 31,953   $ 124,706   $ 130,305  
                                 
    (1) Amounts in the Single-Tenant Retail segment and Office segment reflect changes to the reclassification of one tenant from the Office segment to the Single-Tenant Retail segment to conform to the current year presentation based on a re-evaluation of the property type.
       

    Caution on Use of Non-GAAP Measures

    Funds from Operations (“FFO”), Core Funds from Operations (“Core FFO”), Adjusted Funds from Operations (“AFFO”), Adjusted Earnings before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization (“Adjusted EBITDA”), Net Operating Income (“NOI”), Cash Net Operating Income (“Cash NOI”) and cash paid for interest should not be construed to be more relevant or accurate than the current GAAP methodology in calculating net income or in its applicability in evaluating our operating performance. The method utilized to evaluate the value and performance of real estate under GAAP should be construed as a more relevant measure of operational performance and considered more prominently than the non-GAAP measures.

    Other REITs may not define FFO in accordance with the current National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”) definition (as we do), or may interpret the current NAREIT definition differently than we do, or may calculate Core FFO or AFFO differently than we do. Consequently, our presentation of FFO, Core FFO and AFFO may not be comparable to other similarly-titled measures presented by other REITs in our peer group.

    We consider FFO, Core FFO and AFFO useful indicators of our performance. Because FFO, Core FFO and AFFO calculations exclude such factors as depreciation and amortization of real estate assets and gain or loss from sales of operating real estate assets (which can vary among owners of identical assets in similar conditions based on historical cost accounting and useful-life estimates), FFO, Core FFO and AFFO presentations facilitate comparisons of operating performance between periods and between other REITs.

    As a result, we believe that the use of FFO, Core FFO and AFFO, together with the required GAAP presentations, provide a more complete understanding of our operating performance including relative to our peers and a more informed and appropriate basis on which to make decisions involving operating, financing, and investing activities. However, FFO, Core FFO and AFFO are not indicative of cash available to fund ongoing cash needs, including the ability to make cash distributions. Investors are cautioned that FFO, Core FFO and AFFO should only be used to assess the sustainability of our operating performance excluding these activities, as they exclude certain costs that have a negative effect on our operating performance during the periods in which these costs are incurred.

    Funds from Operations, Core Funds from Operations and Adjusted Funds from Operations

    Funds From Operations

    Due to certain unique operating characteristics of real estate companies, as discussed below, NAREIT, an industry trade group, has promulgated a measure known as FFO, which we believe to be an appropriate supplemental measure to reflect the operating performance of a REIT. FFO is not equivalent to net income or loss as determined under GAAP.

    We calculate FFO, a non-GAAP measure, consistent with the standards established over time by the Board of Governors of NAREIT, as restated in a White Paper approved by the Board of Governors of NAREIT effective in December 2018 (the “White Paper”). The White Paper defines FFO as net income or loss computed in accordance with GAAP, excluding depreciation and amortization related to real estate, gain and loss from the sale of certain real estate assets, gain and loss from change in control and impairment write-downs of certain real estate assets and investments in entities when the impairment is directly attributable to decreases in the value of depreciable real estate held by the entity. Adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures are calculated to exclude the proportionate share of the non-controlling interest to arrive at FFO, Core FFO, AFFO and NOI attributable to stockholders, as applicable. Our FFO calculation complies with NAREIT’s definition.

    The historical accounting convention used for real estate assets requires straight-line depreciation of buildings and improvements, and straight-line amortization of intangibles, which implies that the value of a real estate asset diminishes predictably over time. We believe that, because real estate values historically rise and fall with market conditions, including inflation, interest rates, unemployment and consumer spending, presentations of operating results for a REIT using historical accounting for depreciation and certain other items may be less informative. Historical accounting for real estate involves the use of GAAP. Any other method of accounting for real estate such as the fair value method cannot be construed to be any more accurate or relevant than the comparable methodologies of real estate valuation found in GAAP. Nevertheless, we believe that the use of FFO, which excludes the impact of real estate related depreciation and amortization, among other things, provides a more complete understanding of our performance to investors and to management, and when compared year over year, reflects the impact on our operations from trends in occupancy rates, rental rates, operating costs, general and administrative expenses, and interest costs, which may not be immediately apparent from net income.

    Core Funds From Operations

    In calculating Core FFO, we start with FFO, then we exclude certain non-core items such as merger, transaction and other costs, as well as certain other costs that are considered to be non-core, such as debt extinguishment or modification costs. The purchase of properties, and the corresponding expenses associated with that process, is a key operational feature of our core business plan to generate operational income and cash flows in order to make dividend payments to stockholders. In evaluating investments in real estate, we differentiate the costs to acquire the investment from the subsequent operations of the investment. We also add back non-cash write-offs of deferred financing costs, prepayment penalties and certain other costs incurred with the early extinguishment or modification of debt which are included in net income but are considered financing cash flows when paid in the statement of cash flows. We consider these write-offs and prepayment penalties to be capital transactions and not indicative of operations. By excluding expensed acquisition, transaction and other costs as well as non-core costs, we believe Core FFO provides useful supplemental information that is comparable for each type of real estate investment and is consistent with management’s analysis of the investing and operating performance of our properties.

    Adjusted Funds From Operations

    In calculating AFFO, we start with Core FFO, then we exclude certain income or expense items from AFFO that we consider more reflective of investing activities, other non-cash income and expense items and the income and expense effects of other activities or items, including items that were paid in cash that are not a fundamental attribute of our business plan or were one time or non-recurring items. These items include, for example, early extinguishment or modification of debt and other items excluded in Core FFO as well as unrealized gain and loss, which may not ultimately be realized, such as gain or loss on derivative instruments, gain or loss on foreign currency transactions, and gain or loss on investments. In addition, by excluding non-cash income and expense items such as amortization of above-market and below-market leases intangibles, amortization of deferred financing costs, straight-line rent and equity-based compensation from AFFO, we believe we provide useful information regarding income and expense items which have a direct impact on our ongoing operating performance. We also exclude revenue attributable to the reimbursement by third parties of financing costs that we originally incurred because these revenues are not, in our view, related to operating performance. We also include the realized gain or loss on foreign currency exchange contracts for AFFO as such items are part of our ongoing operations and affect our current operating performance.

    In calculating AFFO, we also exclude certain expenses which under GAAP are treated as operating expenses in determining operating net income. All paid and accrued acquisition, transaction and other costs (including prepayment penalties for debt extinguishments or modifications and merger related expenses) and certain other expenses, including expenses related to our European tax restructuring and transition costs related to the Merger and Internalization, negatively impact our operating performance during the period in which expenses are incurred or properties are acquired and will also have negative effects on returns to investors, but are excluded by us as we believe they are not reflective of our on-going performance. Further, under GAAP, certain contemplated non-cash fair value and other non-cash adjustments are considered operating non-cash adjustments to net income. In addition, as discussed above, we view gain and loss from fair value adjustments as items which are unrealized and may not ultimately be realized and not reflective of ongoing operations and are therefore typically adjusted for when assessing operating performance. Excluding income and expense items detailed above from our calculation of AFFO provides information consistent with management’s analysis of our operating performance. Additionally, fair value adjustments, which are based on the impact of current market fluctuations and underlying assessments of general market conditions, but can also result from operational factors such as rental and occupancy rates, may not be directly related or attributable to our current operating performance. By excluding such changes that may reflect anticipated and unrealized gain or loss, we believe AFFO provides useful supplemental information. By providing AFFO, we believe we are presenting useful information that can be used to, among other things, assess our performance without the impact of transactions or other items that are not related to our portfolio of properties. AFFO presented by us may not be comparable to AFFO reported by other REITs that define AFFO differently. Furthermore, we believe that in order to facilitate a clear understanding of our operating results, AFFO should be examined in conjunction with net income (loss) calculated in accordance with GAAP and presented in our consolidated financial statements. AFFO should not be considered as an alternative to net income (loss) as an indication of our performance or to cash flows as a measure of our liquidity or ability to make distributions.

    Adjusted Earnings before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization, Net Operating Income, Cash Net Operating Income and Cash Paid for Interest

    We believe that Adjusted EBITDA, which is defined as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization adjusted for acquisition, transaction and other costs, other non-cash items and including our pro-rata share from unconsolidated joint ventures, is an appropriate measure of our ability to incur and service debt. We also exclude revenue attributable to the reimbursement by third parties of financing costs that we originally incurred because these revenues are not, in our view, related to operating performance. All paid and accrued acquisition, transaction and other costs (including prepayment penalties for debt extinguishments or modifications) and certain other expenses, including expenses related to our European tax restructuring and transition costs related to the Merger and Internalization, negatively impact our operating performance during the period in which expenses are incurred or properties are acquired and will also have negative effects on returns to investors, but are not reflective of on-going performance. Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered as an alternative to cash flows from operating activities, as a measure of our liquidity or as an alternative to net income (loss) as calculated in accordance with GAAP as an indicator of our operating activities. Other REITs may calculate Adjusted EBITDA differently and our calculation should not be compared to that of other REITs.

    NOI is a non-GAAP financial measure equal to net income (loss), the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, less discontinued operations, interest, other income and income from preferred equity investments and investment securities, plus corporate general and administrative expense, acquisition, transaction and other costs, depreciation and amortization, other non-cash expenses and interest expense. We use NOI internally as a performance measure and believe NOI provides useful information to investors regarding our financial condition and results of operations because it reflects only those income and expense items that are incurred at the property level. Therefore, we believe NOI is a useful measure for evaluating the operating performance of our real estate assets and to make decisions about resource allocations. Further, we believe NOI is useful to investors as a performance measure because, when compared across periods, NOI reflects the impact on operations from trends in occupancy rates, rental rates, operating costs and acquisition activity on an unlevered basis, providing perspective not immediately apparent from net income. NOI excludes certain components from net income in order to provide results that are more closely related to a property’s results of operations. For example, interest expense is not necessarily linked to the operating performance of a real estate asset and is often incurred at the corporate level as opposed to the property level. In addition, depreciation and amortization, because of historical cost accounting and useful life estimates, may distort operating performance at the property level. NOI presented by us may not be comparable to NOI reported by other REITs that define NOI differently. We believe that in order to facilitate a clear understanding of our operating results, NOI should be examined in conjunction with net income (loss) as presented in our consolidated financial statements. NOI should not be considered as an alternative to net income (loss) as an indication of our performance or to cash flows as a measure of our liquidity.

    Cash NOI is a non-GAAP financial measure that is intended to reflect the performance of our properties. We define Cash NOI as net operating income (which is separately defined herein) excluding amortization of above/below market lease intangibles and straight-line rent adjustments that are included in GAAP lease revenues. We believe that Cash NOI is a helpful measure that both investors and management can use to evaluate the current financial performance of our properties and it allows for comparison of our operating performance between periods and to other REITs. Cash NOI should not be considered as an alternative to net income, as an indication of our financial performance, or to cash flows as a measure of liquidity or our ability to fund all needs. The method by which we calculate and present Cash NOI may not be directly comparable to the way other REITs calculate and present Cash NOI.

    Cash Paid for Interest is calculated based on the interest expense less non-cash portion of interest expense and amortization of mortgage (discount) premium, net. Management believes that Cash Paid for Interest provides useful information to investors to assess our overall solvency and financial flexibility. Cash Paid for Interest should not be considered as an alternative to interest expense as determined in accordance with GAAP or any other GAAP financial measures and should only be considered together with and as a supplement to our financial information prepared in accordance with GAAP.

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI USA: Wyden, Merkley Join Bill to Codify DOJ’s Office of Environmental Justice

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator Ron Wyden (D-Ore)

    February 27, 2025

    Washington, D.C. U.S. Senators Ron Wyden and Jeff Merkley said today they are joining legislation that would permanently codify the Office of Environmental Justice within the Department of Justice’s Environment and Natural Resources Division, in the wake of Attorney General Pam Bondi’s recent order eliminating all environmental justice efforts at the department.

    Bondi’s directive followed Donald Trump’s executive order ending all Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion initiatives across federal agencies. As a result, programs combating pollution in communities of color, indigenous people, and low-income areas were effectively shut down in Oregon and nationwide. The Trump administration also terminated several division attorneys responsible for prosecuting environmental violations. 

    “The attack on environmental justice is an attack on the millions of Americans relying on clean air and clean water across our country,” Wyden said. “Federal agencies have a responsibility to protect our communities – not tear down solutions that keep people healthy for generations. Trump and his oil-loving cronies are not just making the climate crisis worse. They are also harming the most vulnerable communities in America.” 

    “Everyone, in every corner of Oregon—and across the country—deserves clean air, clean water, and protection from climate chaos. Unfortunately, the dismantling of environmental justice efforts by the Trump Administration has left our most vulnerable communities exposed to even greater risks,” Merkley said. “The Empowering and Enforcing Environmental Justice Act addresses these disparities by codifying vital protections, holding polluters accountable, and ensuring that every community, especially those most impacted by climate disasters and toxic pollution, has the necessary tools to secure a healthier, safer future.”

    The legislation would strengthen efforts at the Department of Justice to enforce environmental laws, hold polluters accountable, and support state and local environmental enforcement capacity. The Empowering and Enforcing Environmental Justice Act would also authorize $50 million in annual grant funding to assist state and local governments with their own environmental enforcement efforts.

    Senator Wyden is a longtime champion of environmental justice. In 2019, Wyden and his colleagues introduced legislation to overhaul the federal energy tax code, create jobs, and combat climate change. In 2022, Wyden’s Clean Energy for America Act was enacted as part of the Inflation Reduction Act – significantly lowering carbon emissions while reducing energy costs. In 2024, Wyden announced a federal investment of $20 million for the Confederated Tribes of Grand Ronde to build a safe, accessible shelter for communities affected by the rising climate crisis. 

    The bill was introduced by U.S. Senator Alex Padilla, D-Calif., and in addition to Wyden and Merkley, the bill was co-sponsored by Senators Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., Cory Booker, D-N.J., Tammy Duckworth, D-Ill., Edward J. Markey, D-Mass., Bernard Sanders, I-Vt., Adam Schiff, D-Calif., Chris Van Hollen, D-Md, and U.S. Representatives Yassamin Ansari, D-Ariz., Suzanne Bonamici, D-Ore., Jasmine Crockett, D-Texas., Diana DeGette, D-Colo., Tim Kennedy, D-N.Y., Raja Krishnamoorthi, D-Ill., Doris Matsui, D-Calif., LaMonica McIver, D-N.J., Eleanor Holmes Norton, D-D.C., Dina Titus, D-Nev., and Rashida Tlaib, D-Mich.

    The text of the bill is here.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: ICYMI — On “Morning Joe,” Senator King Warns of Unconstitutional Overstep by White House

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Maine Angus King

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — U.S. Senator Angus King (I-Maine) today joined Morning Joe to stress the urgency of the unprecedented, unconstitutional overstep from President Trump’s Administration and Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). During the interview — which comes in the midst of another round of reckless federal layoffs — King made clear the dangers of Congress further ceding it’s power to the President, noting that doing so is a “fundamental misunderstanding” of what is outlined in the Constitution.

    You can watch the full clip on YouTube here

    Senator King has been consistently sounding the alarm on President Donald Trump’s existential threat to the Constitution. At the end of January, he gave a speech on the Senate floor sharing that this administration is doing ‘exactly what the Framers [of the Constitution] most feared.” A couple weeks later, he took to the floor again to respond to the hiring freezes and firings, calling them “thoughtless and dangerous.” Senator King also previously declared that the proposal to halt all federal grant and loan disbursement was illegal and a direct assault on the Constitution. Recently, he joined 36 Senators in a letter to Secretary of State Marco Rubio, sharing the detrimental effects of  the Trump Administration’s dismantling of the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID). He also joined fellow Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI) colleagues in writing a letter to the White House about the risks to national security by allowing unvetted Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) staff and representatives to access classified and sensitive government materials.

    +++

    Mika Brzezinski: “It’s been five weeks since President Trump took office for the second time, and his administration has reshaped government on everything from law and order, to the role of the free press. With that as our backdrop, our next guest took to the Senate floor last week with a message to his colleagues, ‘it’s time to wake up.’”

    Sen. King: “This isn’t just a battle between the Senate and the House and the President, and they’re fighting about powers. No, the reason the framers designed our Constitution the way they did was that they were afraid of concentrated power. The responsibility of the president is to take care that the laws be faithfully executed, not write the laws, not deny the laws, not ignore the laws, not pick which laws he or she likes, but to take care that the laws are faithfully executed. That’s the responsibility of the president. And right now, those laws are being ignored. Power was divided for a reason. There’s some criticism now in the press saying people are talking about a constitutional crisis. They’re crying wolf. No, this is a constitutional crisis. It’s the most serious assault on our Constitution in the history of this country. It is the most serious assault on the very structure of our Constitution—which is designed to protect our freedoms and our liberty — in the history of this country. It is a constitutional crisis. And I’ll tell you what makes it worse. The President and the Vice President are already hinting that they’re not going to obey decisions of the courts. What’s it going to take for us to wake up? When I say us, I mean this entire body to wake up to what’s going on here? Is it going to be too late? Is it going to be when the President has accreted all this power and the congress is an afterthought? What’s it going to take? I mean, the offenses keep piling up. The President over the weekend famously quoted Napoleon, ‘when you’re saving your country, you don’t have to obey any law’. Wow. A president of the United States, quoting Napoleon about not having to obey the law.”

    Mika Brzezinski: “Independent Senator Angus King of Maine, joins us now. It’s great to have you back on the show, Senator. Katty Kay has the first question for you, sir. Katty.”

    Katty Kay: “Senator, I’ve known you for a long time, and you are not given to making speeches lightly like that on the floor. You choose your words carefully. Who were you talking to? Who was your audience? What were you trying to achieve when you stood up there on the Senate Floor and spoke to your colleagues?” 

    Sen. King: “I was trying to capture the conscience of the Republican Senators because that’s where the power is. They have a 53 vote majority in the Senate, and they can go to the White House and tell the President, ‘slow down.’ This is not the way our system is designed. They have some influence. That’s what I’m really talking about. What’s shocking to me is that we’re not standing up for the Constitution. And when the Executive, when the President cancels a whole agency created by Congress, whether it’s AID or the Consumer Finance Board or the independent agencies that were set up almost 100 years ago to protect the public as independent agencies, the Congress is not only giving its power, but as I said in the speech, we’re violating the fundamental structure of the Constitution, which was there in order to protect us. The framers were students of human nature, and they understood a very important principle. Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Therefore, they divided power. That’s what the constitution is all about. It divides power between the president, the congress, the courts, the states, and the federal government so that nobody would have all the power, because that inevitably leads to abuse.”

    Katty Kay: “You’re an independent. You vote with Democrats, by and large, but I know you have good relationships with your Republican colleagues as well. Do you think they’re open to your message? When you have your private conversations with them? And I don’t want you to disclose names, are you hearing murmurs of disquiet?”

    Sen. King: “I think, yes, I think disquiet is a good word. I think they’re uneasy. I think many of them understand what’s going on, although their public posture is, ‘well the courts will protect us, the courts will take care of us.’ Well, there are two problems with that. Number one, it’s a cop out. We’re not holding up our end of the constitutional bargain. We all take an oath when we come in to defend the Constitution, not a president or a party, but to defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic. I think it’s fascinating that the framers had an idea there might be domestic enemies to the Constitution. So it’s our responsibility. And the other the other part about the courts is, as I mentioned in the speech, the Vice President and the President have already made noises about not obeying court orders. What happens then? That’s where I think it is our responsibility in the Congress. And again, I want to repeat this is not institutional jealousy. Although Madison in the Federalist thought institutional jealousy would protect this division of power, but he didn’t contemplate parties, that’s one of the problems. But it is not institutional jealousy. It’s the fundamental structure that keeps us free from an autocrat, from a dictator, from a monarch. These guys in 1787 had just fought a brutal seven year war against a king. They didn’t want concentrated power. They wanted it to be divided. And if Donald Trump doesn’t like AID, come to Congress and pass a bill. He’s got a majority in both houses to abolish it, but don’t do it in the middle of the night with this guy, Musk, and nobody knows who he’s working for or what his authority is. You know, we’ve got a bunch of 25 year-olds deciding to cut programs. Here’s another example from the other day. And this tells you where we are. Someone pointed out that the Ebola Prevention Program was cut in the AID cuts. Musk said, ‘oh, that was a mistake. We’re going to fix it.’ Think of the implications of that. What he’s really saying is, ‘I get to decide which programs we fund and which we don’t.’ That’s not the way our system is set up. That’s not the way this thing is supposed to work again, to protect our freedoms. People who are cheering all of this going on, boy, they’re going to have some second thoughts when the eye of Sauron turns to them.”

    Katty Kay: “As it will.”

    Willie Geist: “Senator, good morning. It’s great to have you on. In fact, Elon Musk just yesterday stood up in that cabinet meeting and sort of laughed off what happened with Ebola, saying, ‘we made a mistake and we fixed it.’ We reported this morning the Washington Post saying that actually hasn’t been fixed yet, and that money has not been put back where it needs to be to fight Ebola. Just one example. I’m just curious as to follow up on what Katty said about your fellow senators, Republicans and members of the House as well. Thinking of Speaker Mike Johnson, who is a constitutional lawyer, when they say — ”

    Sen. King:
    “I wonder what constitution he’s a lawyer of”

    Willie Geist: “Well, that’s a fair question. In many cases, going back to the 2020 election, forward where he helped Donald Trump with all that. But when they say, ‘look, we’re doing this because the country elected Donald Trump with a mandate. We just have to carry out what he says to do,’ that strikes a lot of people as a fundamental misunderstanding of the role of Congress and the checks and balance of our government. So what do you make of that argument that these, these men and women view their role as a rubber stamp of what Donald Trump wants, whatever it may be, and even if it violates the Constitution?”


    Sen. King: “Well, I think the best answer to that is to go back to the oath that we all take. The oath isn’t to a president, it isn’t to a party, but to the Constitution itself. And the Constitution is very clear about the division of power. In fact, the Constitution, as I mentioned in the speech, doesn’t give the president all that much power. He is Commander in Chief, yes, but the fundamental responsibility of the president in the Constitution is to, quote, ‘take care that the laws be faithfully executed.’ I emphasize the word executed. That means carry forward. It doesn’t mean write the laws, create the laws, ignore which laws you like. And for a member of Congress to say, well, we’ve got to do whatever the president says is a fundamental misunderstanding and in my view, a violation of our of our oath and our obligation to the people of this country to keep intact the division of power, which is what keeps us safe.”

    Mika Brzezinski: “Independent Senator Angus King of Maine. Thank you very much for coming on the show this morning.”

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: King, Secretary of the Navy Nominee Discuss What Shipbuilders Can Learn from Private Sector

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Maine Angus King

    To watch or download the exchange, click here

    WASHINGTON, D.C.—Today, U.S. Senator Angus King (I-ME) and the nominee for Secretary of the Navy discussed utilizing lessons from the private sector to maintain best practices for ship designing, building, and maintenance. In a hearing of the Senate Armed Services Committee (SASC), King pressed the Trump Administration’s nominee, John Phelan, on his plans to benchmark Navy ships against private sector companies. To make the armed services more efficient. Later in their exchange, Senator King invited the nominee, if confirmed, to visit Maine’s shipyards – Bath Iron Works and Portsmouth Naval Shipyard – to get a better understanding of workforce needs like child care and available employee parking.

    King began, “I love your focus on maintenance. I have a half facetious, half serious suggestion. We should benchmark our availability of our ships against … cruise lines. If they had the low availability we have, they would be out of business a long time ago. You understand that when you have an enormous capital asset it should be used. Every minute that it is not used is penalizing the taxpayers and diminishing the effectiveness of the Navy. I hope that you will really focus on that and I would like to see the metrics over a period of years of time in dry dock versus availability. I take it that is going to be a significant focus of your work?”

    Thank you for the question, Senator King. I did enjoy our time together,” Phelan responded. “I jokingly say President Trump has texted me numerous times very late at night, sometimes after 1:00 in the morning, of rusty ships, or ships in a yard, asking me what I’m doing about it. And I told him I’m not confirmed yet and have not been able to do anything about it but I will be very focused on it. I view it as a critical issue and I think your idea about benchmarking versus some of the other private sector companies is a very good idea and understanding how they keep these things running is very important. I know under a prior secretary before they used Southwest Airlines to come in to help with our planes and getting more efficient. There are a lot of best practices to be shared across the two and I am hoping with my relationships and contacts in the private sector we should be able to do that.”

    King responded, “I loved it when you said we’ve never done it before it is not a sufficient excuse. You’ve got to be looking forward and not backward.” 

    King then followed up on the conversation to invite Phelan to Maine and highlight the workforce issues affecting Maine’s shipyards.

    King continued to share, “By the way, I want to invite you to the ill-named Portsmouth Naval Shipyard, and to Bath Iron Works where the DDGs are built. In our legislation, we talked about fostering a collaborative relationship between the Navy and the two major shipyards that build DDGs on the DDX design so it is buildable. One of the problems is that design is separated and then you go to build it and it is very expensive. I hope you will commit to continuing that collaborative relationship and stepping it up because I understand it has faltered to some extent.”

    Thank you for the question. If confirmed, I look forward to visiting Maine and New Hampshire with you.  I’ve been trying to spend time understanding how the whole process works. I read a book about how the B-2 bombers were designed by 12 people and I believe when I met with Senator Ernst she mentioned that on one ship we had 800 people designing a ship. I don’t know how you build something with 800 people. It just adds to requirements,” Phelan responded.

    King concluded, “Collaboration between the Navy and ship builders would bear fruit for the taxpayers as well as the buildability of the ship. Workforce and shipbuilding I wanted to talk about. Believe it or not, parking and childcare are issues in the workforce and that doesn’t sound like it would be a Navy project to build a parking garage or a childcare center, but that is absolutely necessary in order to maintain the workforce in shipbuilding in the economy we are in today.”

    As a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, Senator King has championed funding for both Bath Iron Works (BIW) and Portsmouth Naval Shipyard (PNSY). Last year, he strongly urged Mr. Frederick J. Stefany, Acting Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Research, Development and Acquisition to prioritize long-term investments in the defense industrial base – including Bath Iron Works—to avoid a ‘trough’ between contracted work, resulting in a likely loss of workers and threatening American national security. In the Senate passed FY2025 National Defense Authorization Act, Senator King secured authorization for the procurement of an addition DDG-51 Arleigh Burke-class destroyer that Bath Iron Works will build.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Senator Murkowski Applauds Implementation of Social Security Fairness Act

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Alaska Lisa Murkowski

    02.27.25

    Washington, DC – U.S. Senator Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) applauded an announcement from the Social Security Administration (SSA) that the agency will immediately begin to pay retroactive Social Security benefits to those impacted by the Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP) and Government Pension Offset (GPO).  Retroactive payments will be calculated back to January 1, 2024.  Most of those impacted will receive their retroactive payments by the end of March and higher benefit payments going forward will be reflected beginning in April. 

    Some beneficiaries whose cases are more complex may need to wait for the SSA to recalculate their benefits by hand; those impacted by GPO or WEP who have not received retroactive payments or higher benefit payments should contact the SSA at the end of April with questions.

    These adjustments were guaranteed to public servants who have been impacted by WEP and GPO under the Social Security Fairness Act, which was signed into law January 5, 2025. Senator Murkowski has been a long-time proponent of the measure, co-sponsoring the legislation every Congress since 2003.

    On February 5, 2025, Senator Murkowski joined her colleagues in sending a letter to the Acting Commissioner of the SSA, Michelle King, calling for the quick implementation of the Social Security Fairness Act.

    “I applaud the Social Security Administration for moving quickly to ensure Alaska’s public servants are able to access the benefits they are entitled to,” said Senator Murkowski. “I have been working on the Social Security Fairness Act for 22 years – and Alaskans have been waiting even longer for their benefits. I’m grateful to the administration for promptly implementing this law so that Alaskans will not have to wait any longer for the benefits they’ve earned.”

    Background:

    Senator Murkowski will continue to keep Alaskans updated on this issue via her website at https://www.murkowski.senate.gov/social-security-fairness-act-information.

    The WEP, enacted in 1983, reduces the Social Security benefits of workers who receive pensions from a federal, state, or local government for employment not covered by Social Security. The GPO, enacted in 1977, reduces Social Security spousal benefits for spouses, widows, and widowers whose spouses receive pensions from a federal, state, or local government. Together, these provisions reduce Social Security benefits for nearly 3 million Americans – including those who worked teachers, state employees, and public safety officers. Alaska is one of the most disproportionately and negatively affected states per capita by the WEP and GPO.

    The Social Security Fairness Act was endorsed by the American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations Alaska (AFL-CIO Alaska), Alaska Fire Chiefs Association (AFCA), Alaska Professional Fighters Association (APFA), National Education Association – Alaska (NEA-A), National Active and Retired Federal Employees Association Alaska (NARFE Alaska), Alaska State Employees Association (ASEA), Fraternal Order of Police (FOP), National Committee to Preserve Social Security & Strengthen Medicare (NCPSSM), Social Security Works, Strengthen Social Security Coalition, American Federation of Teachers (AFT), International Union of Police Association (IUPA), National Association of Police Organizations (NAPO), American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME), National Education Association (NEA), and the Senior Citizens League.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Federal Court Finds Firing of Probationary Federal Employees

    Source: American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees Union

    Judge Alsup calls probationary federal employees “the lifeblood of our government”

    SAN FRANCISCO – Today, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, presided over by Judge William H. Alsup, granted a temporary restraining order against the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) and its Acting Director, Charles Ezell, finding the termination of probationary federal employees illegal because OPM had no authority to order it. Judge Alsup said that when federal agencies fire employees for no reason, “that’s just not right in our country,” adding that we can’t “run our agencies with lies.” “The Office of Personnel Management does not have any authority whatsoever under any statute in the history of the universe to hire and fire employees at another agency,” he stated.

    The judge ordered OPM to immediately notify federal agencies of the ruling, including the Department of Defense, which is poised to terminate thousands of probationary employees tomorrow.Judge Alsup further ordered the federal government to disclose by Tuesday the participants on the February 13 call that has been widely reported to have been the occasion which which OPM ordered the agencies to terminate probationary employees. He indicated that a longer written order would follow shortly on the heels of today’s ruling from the bench.

    The plaintiffs had the following responses to the decision:

    “This ruling by Judge Alsup is an important initial victory for patriotic Americans across this country who were illegally fired from their jobs by an agency that had no authority to do so,” said Everett Kelley, National President of the American Federation of Government Employees. “These are rank-and-file workers who joined the federal government to make a difference in their communities, only to be suddenly terminated due to this administration’s disdain for federal employees and desire to privatize their work. OPM’s direction to agencies to engage in the indiscriminate firing of federal probationary employees is illegal, plain and simple, and our union will keep fighting until we put a stop to these demoralizing and damaging attacks on our civil service once and for all.”

    “We know this decision is just a first step, but it gives federal employees a respite. While they work to protect public health and safety, federal workers have faced constant harassment from unelected billionaires and anti-union extremists whose only goal is to give themselves massive tax breaks at the expense of working people. We will continue to move this case forward with our partners until federal workers are protected against these baseless terminations,” said AFSCME President Lee Saunders.

    “This decision by Judge Alsup is a major win for Main Street. The mass firings of Small Business Administration employees creates uncertainty for time-strapped entrepreneurs. Chaos is the enemy and this ruling brings a little bit more peace of mind to small business owners that keep our economy going,” said Richard Trent, Executive Director for the Main Street Alliance.

    “This ruling is a win for National Park Service employees who have been wrongfully fired across the country,” said Phil Francis, Chair of the Executive Council of the Coalition to Protect America’s National Parks. “NPS employees are dedicated to protecting the irreplaceable resources and stories found at over 430 units of the National Park System. Without our park rangers, our national parks – and the ability of Americans to safely visit them – are at risk. We applaud today’s ruling and we look forward to continuing the work to ensure our parks and people are protected.”

    “The recent mass layoffs have disproportionately affected Veterans, leading to job losses and increased uncertainty. This ruling is a win for the Veterans who have been impacted and rely on federal employment for stability, and these cuts have disrupted their livelihoods,”  said VoteVets Action Fund Chairman Major General (Ret.) Paul Eaton.

    “The rule of law applies to everyone, including presidential administrations,” said Erik Molvar, Executive Director of Western Watersheds Project. “Federal land and wildlife agencies need staff to enforce environmental protection regulations and keep an eye on western public lands, so we are pleased that the courts have struck down these illegal firings.”

    “This is a win for the thousands of public servants who keep our country running, for veterans and their families who rely on the Department of Veterans Affairs and other agencies, and for the millions of Americans who depend on critical government services,” said Jose Vasquez, Executive Director of Common Defense. “The court’s decision stops a blatant power grab that threatened to gut essential services, from veterans’ healthcare to disaster relief. Today, justice prevailed, but our fight continues to ensure no administration can ever again play politics with the livelihoods of those who serve our country and our communities.”

    “The law is clear that OPM has no authority to order the federal agencies to fire their employees. Today’s ruling is an important first step in holding this administration accountable for these unlawful acts,” said Danielle Leonard, Altshuler Berzon, representing the plaintiffs.

    “Today’s decision is an important victory for the rights of federal workers. The work done by the plaintiffs, led by public service unions along with small business, veterans, and conservation organizations, has been extraordinary and tireless,” said Norm Eisen, executive chair of State Democracy Defenders Fund. “Together, we’re going to keep holding this administration accountable whenever and wherever they try to undermine the rights of the people of the United States under the cynical guise of reform.”

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Attorney General Pamela Bondi Announces 29 Wanted Defendants from Mexico Taken into U.S. Custody

    Source: US State of North Dakota

    Today, the United States secured custody of 29 defendants from Mexico who are facing charges in districts around the country relating to racketeering, drug-trafficking, murder, illegal use of firearms, money laundering, and other crimes. The defendants taken into U.S. custody today include leaders and managers of drug cartels recently designated as Foreign Terrorist Organizations and Specially Designated Global Terrorists, such as the Sinaloa Cartel, Cártel de Jalisco Nueva Generación (CJNG), Cártel del Noreste (formerly Los Zetas), La Nueva Familia Michoacana, and Cártel de Golfo (Gulf Cartel).  These defendants are collectively alleged to have been responsible for the importation into the United States of massive quantities of poison, including cocaine, methamphetamine, fentanyl, and heroin, as well as associated acts of violence.

    “As President Trump has made clear, cartels are terrorist groups, and this Department of Justice is devoted to destroying cartels and transnational gangs,” said Attorney General Pamela Bondi. “We will prosecute these criminals to the fullest extent of the law in honor of the brave law enforcement agents who have dedicated their careers — and in some cases, given their lives — to protect innocent people from the scourge of violent cartels. We will not rest until we secure justice for the American people.”

    “The FBI and our partners will scour the ends of the earth to bring terrorists and cartel members to justice,” said FBI Director Kash Patel. “The era of harming Americans and walking free is over.”

    “Today’s actions are a consequence of a White House that negotiates from a position of strength, and an Attorney General who is willing to lead the Department with courage and ferocity,” said Acting Deputy Attorney General Emil Bove. “By prosecuting these defendants to the maximum extent allowable under the law, we honor the memory of Special Agent Camarena, Deputy Sherrif Byrd, and other victims who are far too numerous, as well as decades of hard work in the trenches by our law enforcement partners.”

    “Today, 29 fugitive cartel members have arrived in the United States from Mexico, including one name that stands above the rest for the men and women of the DEA — Rafael Caro Quintero. Caro Quintero, a cartel kingpin who unleashed violence, destruction, and death across the United States and Mexico, has spent four decades atop DEA’s most wanted fugitives list, and today we can proudly say he has arrived in the United States where justice will be served,” said DEA Acting Administrator Derek S. Maltz. “This moment is extremely personal for the men and women of DEA who believe Caro Quintero is responsible for the brutal torture and murder of DEA Special Agent Enrique “Kiki” Camarena. It is also a victory for the Camarena family. Today sends a message to every cartel leader, every trafficker, every criminal poisoning our communities: You will be held accountable. No matter how long it takes, no matter how far you run, justice will find you.”

    Many of the defendants were subject to longstanding U.S. extradition requests that were not honored during the prior Administration, but that the Mexican government elected to transfer to the current U.S. government in response to the Justice Department’s efforts pursuant to President Trump’s directive in Executive Order 14157, entitled Designating Cartels and Other Organizations as Foreign Terrorist Organizations and Specially Designated Global Terrorists, to pursue total elimination of these Cartels. Federal prosecutors will evaluate whether additional terrorism and violence charges are appropriate based on the policy set forth in Executive Order 14157, and whether capital punishment is available based on Executive Order 14164, entitled Restoring the Death Penalty and Protecting Public Safety, as well as the Attorney General’s Feb. 5 guidance regarding the death penalty.

    • Rafael Caro Quintero, who is alleged to have been among those responsible for the 1985 murder of DEA agent Enrique “Kiki” Camarena and others.
    • Martin Sotelo, who is alleged to have participated in the 2022 murder of Deputy Sheriff Ned Byrd.
    • Antonio Oseguera Cervantes, who allegedly helped lead CJNG and is reportedly the brother of Nemesio Oseguera Cervantes, also known as “El Mencho.”
    • Ramiro Perez Moreno and Lucio Hernandez Lechuga, who are alleged to be high-ranking members of Los Zetas.

    A complete list of defendants, as well as districts where they are charged and will appear in federal court in the coming days:

    Mexico Defendants

      Name

    Arraignment

    Jurisdiction

    Statutory Maximum
    1 CANOBBIO-INZUNZA, Jose Angel Northern District Illinois Up to life imprisonment
    2. VALENCIA GONZALEZ, Norberto Northern District of Illinois Up to life imprisonment
    3. MARTIN SOTELO, Alder, also known as “Alder Martin-Sotelo” and “Alder Alfonso Marin”

    Middle District of North Carolina

    North Carolina State Court

    Federal: Maximum 10 years imprisonment

    State: Maximum of life imprisonment or death

    4. CRUZ SANCHEZ, Evaristo Southern District of Texas Up to life imprisonment
    5. GARCIA VILLANO, also known as “La Kena,” “19,” and “Ciclone 19” Southern District of Texas Up to life imprisonment
    6. HERNANDEZ LECHUGA, Lucio Eastern District of Texas Up to life imprisonment
    7. PEREZ MORENO, Ramiro Eastern District of Texas Up to life imprisonment
    8. RODRIGUEZ DIAZ, Miguel Angel, also known as “Metro” Eastern District of Texas Up to life imprisonment
    9. VILLARREAL HERNANDEZ, Jose Rodolfo Northern District of Texas Death or life imprisonment
    10. CARO QUINTERO, Rafael Eastern District of New York Death or life imprisonment
    11. CARRILLO FUENTES, Vicente Eastern District of New York Death or life imprisonment
    12. CABRERA CABRERA, Jose Bibiano District of Arizona Up to life imprisonment
    13. CLARK, Andrew Central District of California Death or life imprisonment
    14. INFANTE, Hector Eduardo Central District of California Up to life imprisonment
    15. LIMON LOPEZ, Jesus Humberto District of Arizona Up to life imprisonment
    16. TAPIA QUINTERO, Jose Guadalupe District of Arizona Up to life imprisonment
    17. TORRES ACOSTA, Inez Enrique Southern District of California Up to life imprisonment
    18. GALAVIZ VEGA, Jesus Western District of Texas Up to life imprisonment
    19. MENDEZ ESTEVANE, Luis Geraldo Western District of Texas Death or life imprisonment
    20. MONSIVAIS TREVINO, Carlos Alberto Western District of Texas Up to life imprisonment
    21. ALGREDO VAZQUEZ, Carlos District of Columbia Up to life imprisonment
    22. LOPEZ IBARRA, Rodolfo District of Columbia Up to life imprisonment
    23. OSEGUERA CERVANTES, Antonio District of Columbia Up to life imprisonment
    24. RANGEL BUENDIA, Alfredo District of Columbia Up to life imprisonment
    25. TREVINO MORALES, Miguel Angel, also known as “Z-40” District of Columbia Up to life imprisonment
    26. TREVINO MORALES, Omar, also known as “Z-42”) District of Columbia Up to life imprisonment
    27. VALENCIA SALAZAR, Erick District of Columbia Up to life imprisonment
    28. MENDEZ VARGAS, Jesus Southern District of New York Up to life imprisonment
    29. PALACIOS GARCIA, Itiel Southern District of New York Up to life imprisonment

    Attorney General Pamela Bondi thanked the law enforcement officers of the Drug Enforcement Administration, FBI, U.S. Marshal’s Service, and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement – Homeland Security Investigations, and Hidalgo County Sheriff’s Office for their valuable contributions to these investigations.

    The Attorney General also thanked the Justice Department Criminal Division’s Narcotic and Dangerous Drug Section and its Office of International Affairs, and the U.S. Attorneys’ Offices for the District of Arizona, Central District of California, Southern District of California, the District of Columbia, Middle District of North Carolina, Northern District of Illinois, Eastern District of New York, Southern District of New York, Northern District of Texas, Eastern District of Texas, Southern District of Texas, and Western District of Texas for handling the prosecutions of these cases.

    An indictment is merely an allegation. All defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Cantwell Statement on Mass NOAA Layoffs

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Washington Maria Cantwell
    02.27.25
    Cantwell Statement on Mass NOAA Layoffs
    WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, the Trump Administration laid off at least 880 workers from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). U.S. Senator Maria Cantwell (D-WA), ranking member of the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation and senior member of the Senate Finance Committee, issued the following statement:
    “The firings jeopardize our ability to forecast and respond to extreme weather events like hurricanes, wildfires, and floods—putting communities in harm’s way. They also threaten our maritime commerce and endanger 1.7 million jobs that depend on commercial, recreational and tribal fisheries, including thousands in the State of Washington. This action is a direct hit to our economy, because NOAA’s specialized workforce provides products and services that support more than a third of the nation’s GDP.”
    Last week, Sen. Cantwell sent a letter to Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick, calling on him to exempt the National Weather Service (NWS) from the federal hiring freeze, and protect all NOAA workers from firings “that would jeopardize the safety of the American public.”
    “Without NOAA’s workforce, communities will not be prepared for the next big Nor’easter, hurricane, wildfire, or drought,” wrote Sen. Cantwell. “Ships will not be able to safely navigate through our waterways. Farmers will not have the data they need to manage their crops. NOAA’s workforce keeps people alive and provides communities with the scientific support tools to protect their families and grow their businesses. I urge you to appreciate these critical government functions and reverse the hiring freeze and refrain from mass firings of these invaluable public servants—American lives depend on it.”
    Also last week, speaking in opposition to the nomination of now-Secretary Lutnick on the Senate floor, Sen. Cantwell cited his “tepid support” for NOAA as a key reason for her decision to vote against his confirmation.
    “When asked for the record, ‘Should NOAA be dismantled, as called for in Project 2025?’, Mr. Lutnick would only say he’ll figure it out once he’s confirmed,” Sen. Cantwell said. “We needed a bigger commitment to NOAA. NOAA already supplies a big, important aspect of what we deal with, with weather forecasting, tracking extreme weather, hurricanes, wildfires, managing our fisheries, operating ships that conduct important charting for national security. Mr. Lutnick gave very tepid support for NOAA.”
    Project 2025 calls for NOAA to be “dismantled and many of its functions eliminated,” calling it part of the “climate change alarm industry.” NOAA provides critical services to the nation including weather forecasts, extreme storm tracking and monitoring, tools to enable communities to adapt to sea level rise and climate change, supporting fisheries management, and conserving marine mammals and other protected species including salmon and orcas.
    Sen. Cantwell is a champion of NOAA and helped secure $3.3 billion in NOAA investments in the Inflation Reduction Act to help communities prepare for and adapt to climate change, boost science needed to understand changing weather and climate patterns, and invest in advanced computer technologies that are critical for extreme weather prediction and emergency response. Her Fire Ready Nation Act, bipartisan legislation to strengthen NOAA’s ability to help forecast, prevent, and fight wildfires, passed the Commerce committee unanimously earlier this month and now heads to the full Senate for consideration.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Cotton, Slotkin, Colleagues Reintroduce Legislation to Address Cybersecurity Threats to American Agriculture

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Arkansas Tom Cotton
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASEContact: Caroline Tabler or Patrick McCann (202) 224-2353February 26, 2025
    Cotton, Slotkin, Colleagues Reintroduce Legislation to Address Cybersecurity Threats to American Agriculture
    Washington, D.C. — Senator Tom Cotton (R-Arkansas) and Senator Elissa Slotkin (D- Michigan) today reintroduced the Farm and Food Cybersecurity Act, legislation that would strengthen cybersecurity protections for the agriculture and food critical infrastructure sectors. The bill will identify vulnerabilities and improve protective measures of both the government and private groups against cyber threats to America’s food supply chain.
    Co-sponsoring the legislation are Senators Pete Ricketts (R-Nebraska), Thom Tillis (R- North Carolina), Cynthia Lummis (R-Wyoming), Katie Britt (R- Alabama), and Ted Budd (R- North Carolina). Congressman Brad Finstad (Minnesota-01) is introducing companion legislation in the House.
    Bill text may be found here.  
    “America’s adversaries are seeking to gain any advantage they can against us—including targeting critical industries like agriculture. Congress must work with the Department of Agriculture to identify and defeat these cybersecurity vulnerabilities. This legislation will ensure we are prepared to protect the supply chains our farmers and all Americans rely on,” said Senator Cotton.
    “Food security is national security, and the Farm and Food Cybersecurity Act is a vital step toward safeguarding Michigan’s agriculture and food sectors,” said Senator Slotkin. “Cyber attacks threaten our food supply constantly, and we must ensure both government and private industries are prepared. This bipartisan bill will require the Department of Agriculture to work closely with our national security agencies to ensure that our adversaries, like China, can’t threaten our ability to feed ourselves by ourselves.”
    “With innovation and advancement in precision ag technology, the agricultural industry has become more technologically advanced, creating new challenges and vulnerabilities for farmers across southern Minnesota and the nation,” said Congressman Finstad. “Food security is national security. The Farm and Food Cybersecurity Act will make tremendous strides to protect our nation’s food supply from the imminent cyber threats that the ag sector experiences here at home.”
    Supporting the legislation are the North American Millers Association, National Cattlemen’s Beef Association, USA Rice, National Council of Farmer Cooperatives.
    The Farm and Food Cybersecurity Act would:
    Direct the Secretary of Agriculture to conduct a risk assessment every two years of the cybersecurity threat to, and vulnerabilities in, the agriculture and food sectors and submit a report to Congress.
    Direct the Secretary of Agriculture, in coordination with the Secretaries of Homeland Security and Health and Human Services, as well as the Director of National Intelligence, to conduct an annual cross-sector crisis simulation exercise for food-related cyber emergencies or disruptions.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Virginia Delegation Blasts Trump Administration Agenda to Relocate Federal Workers

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Virginia Tim Kaine

    WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, U.S. Senators Mark R. Warner and Tim Kaine (both D-VA), and U.S. Representatives Bobby Scott (D-VA-3), Gerry Connolly (D-VA-11), Don Beyer (D-VA-8), Jennifer McClellan (D-VA-4), Suhas Subramanyam (D-VA-10), and Eugene Vindman (D-VA-7) released the following statement blasting the Trump Administration’s agenda to relocate offices and bureaus out of the National Capital Region:

    “We’ve already seen President Trump try to shrink the federal workforce by executing illegal mass firings, politicize the federal workforce by nominating political hacks who will side with Trump over our Constitution, and now, we’re seeing him try to relocate the federal workforce by ripping federal workers and their families from our communities. Not only do Virginia’s 140,000 federal workers dedicate their careers to serving their fellow Americans—they make countless other contributions to the Commonwealth. They worship in Virginia churches, send their kids to Virginia schools, and support Virginia businesses. They have made Virginia their home, and Virginia is better for it. We won’t stand idly by while they are kicked around and forced to uproot their lives and their families—we will do everything we can to stop that from happening, just like every leader in Virginia should.”

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Kaine, Blumenthal, Colleagues Demand Trump Reinstate Illegally Fired Veterans

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Virginia Tim Kaine

    WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, U.S. Senators Tim Kaine (D-VA), a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, and Richard Blumenthal (D-CT), the Ranking Member of the Senate Veterans’ Affairs Committee, led a group of 19 senators in a letter calling on President Donald Trump to cease his attack on American veterans in the federal workforce and immediately reinstate all of the estimated 6,000 veterans who were fired under the Administration’s mass terminations of federal employees. The letter also demanded the veterans receive their full benefits and back pay. Veterans make up 30 percent of the federal workforce, with 640,000 veterans working in federal agencies – meaning the Trump Administration’s haphazard efforts to gut the civil service have disproportionately affected veterans.

    “We are increasingly concerned by the real-life negative impacts your Administration’s directives are having on our nation’s military and veteran community,” wrote the senators. “This includes the abrupt and indiscriminate termination of more than 30,000 employees across the federal government. Among those fired are veterans, military spouses, caregivers, survivors, and Guard and Reserve members with exemplary performance reviews … These men and women have dedicated their careers to serving veterans and their nation. In return, your Administration has upended their lives and casually discarded their service without any notice or justification – all for a statistic on a press release.”

    The senators continued, “Federal civil service has long been a preferred path for military-affiliated populations, allowing them to continue serving our country while offering competitive wages, benefits, and much-needed stability…At DOD, where you have announced the imminent firing of 5,400 employees, with plans to cut anywhere from 35,000 to 56,000 in the near future – the percentage of veterans is nearly 50 percent. And at VA, where veterans are able to do work directly impacting their fellow veterans, the percentage of veteran employees is nearly 30 percent. Each and every day, these veterans perform duties vital to the American people, our national security and our way of life.”

    The senators concluded, “Your Administration’s actions are damaging the economic security and morale of our military and veteran families, the federal government’s ability to recruit and retain high-quality talent, and ultimately, our national security. We demand that you cease your attacks on our nation’s heroes, who have already given so much in defense of our country, and immediately reinstate those who have beenjacky ros illegally fired with their full back pay and benefits.”

    In addition to Kaine and Blumenthal, the letter was signed by U.S. Senators Mazie Hirono (D-HI), Amy Klobuchar (D-MN), Cory Booker (D-NJ), Mark Kelly (D-AZ), Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Jacky Rosen (D-NV), Tammy Baldwin (D-WI), Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI), Ben Ray Luján (D-NM), Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH), Bernard Sanders (I-VT), Tammy Duckworth (D-IL), John Hickenlooper (D-CO), Gary Peters (D-MI), Rev. Raphael Warnock (D-GA), Catherine Cortez Masto (D-NV), Ron Wyden (D-OR), Angela Alsobrooks (D-MD), and Richard Durbin (D-IL).

    A copy of the letter is available here and below.

    Dear President Trump,

    We are increasingly concerned by the real-life negative impacts your Administration’s directives are having on our nation’s military and veteran community. This includes the abrupt and indiscriminate termination of more than 30,000 employees across the federal government. Among those fired are veterans, military spouses, caregivers, survivors, and Guard and Reserve members with exemplary performance reviews – including 2,400 employees at the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and thousands of employees at the Department of Defense (DOD). These men and women have dedicated their careers to serving veterans and their nation. In return, your Administration has upended their lives and casually discarded their service without any notice or justification – all for a statistic on a press release.

    Federal civil service has long been a preferred path for military-affiliated populations, allowing them to continue serving our country while offering competitive wages, benefits, and much-needed stability. In return, every single agency in our government and every single taxpayer benefits from these experienced, talented, and dedicated employees. Across the federal government, veterans make up approximately 30 percent of the workforce – more than 640,000 veterans. At DOD, where you have announced the imminent firing of 5,400 employees, with plans to cut anywhere from 35,000 to 56,000 in the near future – the percentage of veterans is nearly 50 percent. And at VA, where veterans are able to do work directly impacting their fellow veterans, the percentage of veteran employees is nearly 30 percent. Each and every day, these veterans perform duties vital to the American people, our national security and our way of life.

    Rather than leading these employees and utilizing their talents to better serve veterans and taxpayers, you have chosen to fire them in an abrupt, inconsistent, unjustified, and unlawful way with no consultation with Congress and absolutely no transparency or accountability to the American people. Your Administration’s actions are damaging the economic security and morale of our military and veteran families, the federal government’s ability to recruit and retain high-quality talent, and ultimately, our national security. We demand that you cease your attacks on our nation’s heroes, who have already given so much in defense of our country, and immediately reinstate those who have been illegally fired with their full back pay and benefits.

    Sincerely,

    MIL OSI USA News