Source: United States of America – The White House (video statements)
Easter hits different at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue #WHEasterEggRoll
Source: United States of America – The White House (video statements)
Easter hits different at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue #WHEasterEggRoll
Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Glenn Ivey – Maryland (4th District)
Contact: Aaron Harawa
Email: Aaron.Harawa@mail.house.gov
WASHINGTON, DC – Today, Congressman Glenn Ivey (MD-04) sent a letter to President Donald Trump demanding the immediate return of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, who was wrongfully deported to El Salvador, to the United States, despite having been granted protection from deportation by a United States immigration court. Despite the Trump Administration admitting Mr. Abrego Garcia’s removal was a mistake and the Supreme Court ordering the facilitation of his return, the Trump Administration has indicated repeatedly it does not intend to comply with the Supreme Court’s order and bring Mr. Abrego Garcia back to the United States. Mr. Abrego Garcia is a Maryland resident, living in Maryland’s Fourth Congressional District with his U.S. citizen wife and family.
Congressman Ivey is joined by 150 of his House Democratic colleagues in sending this urgent letter to President Trump.
“Due process is a fundamental pillar of the rule of law. When those in power trample on due process rights and disregard the rule of law, it threatens the rights and freedoms of all Americans,” said Congressman Glenn Ivey. “Instead of the endless spin and excuses, the Trump Administration should comply with the Supreme Court’s order to facilitate Kilmar Abrego Garcia’s return to his family in the United States. The President has the power to do so and must act without delay. I thank my House Democratic colleagues for their support and for standing up for our nation’s principles.”
150 House Democrats signed the letter, including Reps. Amo, Ansari, Balint, Barragán, Bell, Bera, Beyer, Bonamici, Boyle, Brownley, Budzinski, Carbajal, Carson, Carter, Casar, Casten, Castor, Castro, Chu, Cisneros, Clarke, Cleaver, Cohen, Conaway, Connolly, Correa, Costa, Courtney, Craig, Crow, Davids, Davis, Dean, DeLauro, DelBene, DeSaulnier, Dexter, Doggett, Elfreth, Escobar, Espaillat, Evans, Foster, Foushee, Frankel, Friedman, Frost, Garcia (CA),
Garcia (TX), Goldman, Gomez, Gonzalez, Goodlander, Gottheimer, Green, Hernández, Horsford, Houlahan, Hoyer, Hoyle, Huffman, Jackson (IL), Jacobs, Jayapal, Johnson (GA), Johnson (TX), Kamlager-Dove, Keating, Kelly (IL), Kennedy, Khanna, Krishnamoorthi, Landsman, Larsen, Larson, Lee (PA), Leger Fernandez, Liccardo, Lofgren, Lynch, Magaziner, Matsui, McClain Delaney, McClellan, McCollum, McGovern, McIver, Meeks, Menendez, Meng, Mfume, Moore (WI), Morrison, Mrvan, Mullin, Nadler, Neguse, Norcross, Norton, Ocasio-Cortez, Olszewski, Pallone, Panetta, Peters, Pettersen, Pingree, Pocan, Pressley, Quigley, Ramirez, Randall, Raskin, Rivas, Ross, Ruiz, Sánchez, Scanlon, Schakowsky, Schneider, Scholten, Schrier, Sewell, Sherman, Sherrill, Simon, Smith (WA, Soto, Stansbury, Stevens, Subramanyam, Takano, Thanedar, Thompson (MS), Thompson (CA), Titus, Tlaib, Tonko, Torres (CA), Torres (NY), Trahan, Vargas, Veasey, Velázquez, Vindman, Wasserman Schultz, Waters, Watson Coleman, Williams, Wilson.
Please find the text of the letter here.
###
Source: Office of United States Attorneys
Earlier today, in federal court in Brooklyn, an indictment was unsealed charging Fatjon Shytani, an Albanian national and resident of the Bronx, New York, with a scheme to smuggle illegal aliens from Canada into the United States for financial gain. Shytani was arrested yesterday morning and was arraigned this afternoon before United States Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom.
John J. Durham, United States Attorney for the Eastern District of New York, and Christopher G. Raia, Assistant Director in Charge, Federal Bureau of Investigation, New York Field Office (FBI), announced the arrest and indictment.
“As alleged, Shytani conspired to smuggle illegal aliens into the United States to benefit himself financially, but was thwarted by the outstanding work of our law enforcement partners,” stated United States Attorney Durham. “These types of schemes represent a significant threat to our national security and will not be tolerated. This case demonstrates our Office’s continued dedication to protect our border security and the integrity of the immigration process.”
Mr. Durham also thanked U.S. Customs and Border Protection, the Department of Justice’s Office of International Affairs, the New York City Police Department, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police and the Albanian State Police for their valuable assistance during the investigation.
Fatjon Shytani, an Albanian national, allegedly facilitated the illegal entry of foreign nationals into the United States in exchange for cash payments. This alleged conspiracy established unauthorized border access designed to circumvent proper protocols and evade authorities. The FBI remains dedicated to apprehending any individual who profits from violating the borders and security of our nation.
As alleged in court filings, Shytani and his co-defendants conspired to smuggle foreign nationals from to enter the United States via illegal border crossing at the U.S. border with Canada. During the course of the investigation, Shytani accepted cash from an undercover agent (UC-1) in exchange for arranging to have the agent’s significant other, who purportedly was from the Republic of Kosovo, smuggled across the Canadian border into the United States. In reality, the agent’s significant other was another undercover law enforcement agent (UC-2). Between March 12, 2024 and March 13, 2024, Shytani and UC-1 exchanged phone calls and text messages during which they agreed to meet in person on March 14, 2024, at a coffee shop on Long Island, New York. On March 14, 2024, Shytani met UC-1 at the agreed-upon location where they discussed details regarding UC-2’s illegal crossing from Canada into the United States. At the conclusion of the meeting, UC-1 paid Shytani $14,000 in cash for the planned smuggling service. On March 16, 2024, Shytani’s co-conspirators then attempted to smuggle UC-2 and two other aliens from Canada into the United States before being apprehended and later released by Canadian law enforcement.
The charges in the indictment are allegations, and the defendant is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty. If convicted of alien smuggling and transportation conspiracy, Shytani faces up to 10 years’ imprisonment.
Assistant United States Attorneys Andrew Roddin, Stephanie Pak, and Kate Mathews are in charge of the prosecution. This case is part of Operation Take Back America, a nationwide initiative that marshals the full resources of the Department of Justice to repel the invasion of illegal immigration, achieve the total elimination of cartels and other transnational criminal organizations, and protect our communities from the perpetrators of violent crime. Operation Take Back America streamlines efforts and resources from the Department’s Project Safe Neighborhood.
The Defendant:
FATJON SHYTANI (also known as “Fati”)
Age: 41
Bronx, New York
E.D.N.Y. Docket No. 25-CR-133 (SJB)
Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)
SANTIAGO, Chile, April 21, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — BANCO ITAÚ CHILE (SSE: ITAUCL) announced today that it will release its results for the first quarter ended March 31, 2025, before the market opens in Santiago, on April 30, 2025.
On Friday, May 9, 2025, at 9:00 A.M. Santiago time (9:00 A.M. ET), the Company’s management team will host a conference call to discuss the financial results. The call will be hosted by André Gailey, CEO; Emiliano Muratore, CFO; and Andrés Perez, Chief Economist.
Webinar Details:
Online registration:
https://mzgroup.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_jun0W4C_RSCXLRHeMsyD4A#/registration
All participants must pre-register using this link to join the webinar. Upon registering, each participant will be provided with details to connect to the call.
Q&A session:
The Q&A session will be available for participants through the webinar, where attendees will be allowed to present their questions – we will answer selected questions verbally.
Investor Relations – Itaú Chile
Source: US Department of Labor
BEAVERTON, OR – U.S. Department of Labor Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer delivered a keynote address at the Teamsters Unity Conference last week in Nevada, where she also visited a training facility for aviation mechanics and held a roundtable with local small business owners. Continuing her promise to tell the story of America at Work, the Secretary then traveled to Oregon, where she toured a high school construction project and met with Daimler Truck North America’s Chief Executive Officer John O’Leary.
In her speech to Teamsters last Tuesday, Secretary Chavez-DeRemer highlighted that her father’s experience as a Teamster “meant a paycheck we could count on, a roof over our heads, and a promise that hard work would be respected.” The Secretary concluded her remarks by promising to “push for jobs that pay what you’re worth, for workplaces that keep you safe, and for retirements that let you rest easy after a lifetime of labor.”
NEVADA
Secretary Chavez-DeRemer joins General President Sean O’Brien at the 2025 Teamsters Unity Conference.
The Secretary also visited with faculty, staff, and students at the Aviation Maintenance Institute while witnessing their specialized training program in action. Throughout the tour, she learned more about AIM’s effort to educate the next generation of aviation mechanics and to meet growing demand for airplane technicians.
Secretary Chavez-DeRemer then held a roundtable discussion with the Nevada Hispanic Business Group, an organization focused on empowering local small businesses. She heard from over a dozen employers about challenges they are facing, including overregulation and other economic barriers to success.
OREGON
Secretary Chavez-DeRemer wrapped up the week in Oregon, where she visited the headquarters for truck manufacturing company Daimler Truck North America. With seven U.S. manufacturing sites and 17,000 employees, they discussed the importance of putting American manufacturers first and quickly training the workers needed to fill these good-paying jobs.
Finally, the Secretary stopped by the construction site for Beaverton’s new high school to receive a progress update from Skanska construction workers and local ironworkers assigned to the project. So far, Ironworkers Local 29 has put in more than 21,000 journeymen hours and 6,900 registered apprentice hours for the project, which began nearly a year ago.
Learn more about the Secretary’s listening tour, including her recent stops in Florida and Pennsylvania.
Source: US Department of Labor
The U.S. Department of Labor will honor workers whose jobs have claimed their lives during its national Workers Memorial Day program on April 24, 2025.
The department will welcome families traveling from across the country to the nation’s capital for the program, which pays tribute to men and women who have lost their lives while on the job, as well as all the fallen workers before them, and the survivors who remain to grieve and carry on.
Today, work-related injuries in the U.S. claim about 15 people’s lives a day. In 2023, a reported 5,283 workers suffered fatal injuries, a decrease of 203 worker deaths from 2022.
U.S. Secretary of Labor Lori Chavez-DeRemer, Occupational Safety and Health Administration Acting Assistant Secretary Amanda Wood Laihow, and Mine Safety and Health Administration Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy James Paul McHugh will speak during this year’s Workers Memorial Day ceremony, which will be held at the department’s Washington headquarters at 1 p.m. EDT. The event will also be livestreamed.
Workers Memorial Day is observed on April 28 with local observances across the country that bring together workers, families, and unions in a shared commitment to preventing workplace hazards so that every worker can return home safely at the end of the day.
April 28 also marks a significant milestone in workplace safety – the anniversary of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration – which opened its doors in 1971 following the passage of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970.
Every worker has the right to a safe and healthy workplace. Ensuring workers’ well-being is a shared responsibility that demands ongoing collaboration among employers, labor unions, safety professionals, and workers. Reinforcing workplace protections and promoting a strong safety culture helps prevent tragedies and builds a future where every job is a safe, family-sustaining one.
Learn more about Workers Memorial Day events nationwide.
Source: United States Army
WASHINGTON – The U.S. Army announced today the establishment of the Army Fitness Test (AFT) as the official physical fitness test of record for all Soldiers, replacing the Army Combat Fitness Test.
The five-event AFT, is designed to enhance Soldier fitness, improve warfighting readiness, and increase the lethality of the force.
The AFT consists of the three-repetition maximum deadlift, hand-release push-up army extension, sprint-drag-carry, plank, and two-mile run. RAND Corporation analysis and Army data from nearly 1 million test records helped inform the new standard.
Phased implementation of the AFT will begin June 1, 2025, with new scoring standards for Soldiers in 21 combat military occupational specialties (MOSs) taking effect on January 1, 2026, for the active component and June 1, 2026, for the Reserve and National Guard.
The AFT combat standard is sex-neutral and age-normed. Soldiers serving in combat specialties must achieve a minimum of 60 points per event and an overall minimum score of 350.
The AFT general standard is performance-normed by sex and age groups. Soldiers serving in combat-enabling specialties must attain a score of at least 60 points per event and an overall minimum score of 300.
Implementation guidance and associated execution orders will be released in May.
The change reflects the Army’s continued focus on building a physically ready force capable of meeting operational demands in austere environments.
The Army is also adapting its policy framework to support implementation, including support to Soldiers with medical profiles and governance to monitor the impact of the new standard on readiness, retention, and end strength.
For more information contact:
Matt Ahearn, Office of the Chief of Public Affairs-Media Relations Division
Office: 703-697-5344 | Cell: 703-225-8135
Email: timothy.m.ahearn2.civ@army.mil
Press Desk: usarmy.pentagon.hqda-ocpa.mbx.mrd-press-desk@army.mil
Source: US State Government of Utah
A Maryland attorney pleaded guilty today for not paying employment taxes withheld from the employees of his law firm.
The following is according to court documents and statements made in court: James E. McCollum Jr. was an attorney licensed to practice law in Maryland and the District of Columbia. From 1998 to 2024, McCollum was the sole proprietor of a law firm based in College Park, Maryland, which he operated using a series of business names, including McCollum P.C.; McCollum & Associates LLC; and The McCollum Firm LLC. Nevertheless, McCollum was always the sole owner and operator of the business.
As such, McCollum exercised financial control over the firm, including hiring and supervising employees, operating the payroll, and maintaining signature authority over the business bank accounts. From at least 2000 onward, McCollum was responsible for withholding Social Security, Medicare, and federal income taxes from his employees’ wages and paying those funds over to the government each quarter. McCollum was also obligated to pay over the employer’s share of Social Security and Medicare taxes.
The timely payment of these taxes is critical to the functioning of the U.S. government, because, for example, they are the primary source of funding for Social Security and Medicare. The federal income taxes that are withheld from employees’ wages also account for a significant portion of all federal income taxes collected each year.
Over the last 24 years, McCollum, however, was frequently not compliant with his obligations to pay these taxes to the government or to file the necessary tax returns.
Beginning in 2010, the IRS attempted to collect the unpaid employment taxes, issuing numerous notices and levies to the law firm. When the IRS was unable to collect the outstanding taxes from the firm, it assessed them against McCollum personally and tried to collect them from him as well.
In 2020, instead of paying the taxes that were due, McCollum sought to thwart the IRS’s ongoing collection efforts by transferring his business and its employees to a new entity, The McCollum Firm. Yet, even after the transfer, McCollum continued to not file the requisite tax returns or pay the employment taxes over. McCollum acknowledged that from 2000 through 2024, he did not pay over at least approximately $2,174,992.83 in employment taxes.
McCollum also acknowledged that he did not file his own individual income tax returns and did not pay $220,515 in individual income taxes due for the tax years 2020 through 2022.
The court scheduled sentencing for Sept. 29. McCollum faces a maximum penalty of five years in prison for the failure to pay over employment taxes. A federal district court judge will determine any sentence after considering the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and other statutory factors. McCollum also faces a period of supervised release, restitution, and monetary penalties.
Acting Deputy Assistant Attorney General Karen E. Kelly of the Justice Department’s Tax Division made the announcement.
IRS Criminal Investigation is investigating the case.
Assistant Chief Jorge Almonte and Trial Attorney Mark McDonald of the Justice Department’s Tax Division are prosecuting the case.
Source:
22 April 2025
A brisk walk, a splash of water aerobics, or even a light jog around the block – if your heart rate goes up then so too will your brain health according to new research from the University of South Australia.
Conducted in partnership with the US-based AdventHealth Research Institute, the new study found that staying active through moderate-to-vigorous physical activity is associated with significantly better processing speed, working memory, and executive function in older adults.
Interestingly, the biggest cognitive gains were seen among people who went from doing no moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, to even doing just five minutes, clearly illustrating the power of exercise for the human brain.
Assessing data from 585 older adults (aged 65-80 years) in the USA-based IGNITE trial*, the study examined associations between time spent in sleep, sedentary behaviour, light physical activity, and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity across the 24-hr day, and cognitive performance.
Researchers identified a two-way relationship between ‘huff-and-puff’ physical activity and brain health: do more exercise and your brain health improves; but do less and it declines.
UniSA researcher, Dr Maddison Mellow says the study highlights how small changes to your daily activities can have big impacts on your brain health.
“There are three mutually exclusive lifestyle behaviours in the 24-hour day – sleep, sedentary behaviour and physical activity – and how these interact to influence our health outcomes,” Dr Mellow says.
“For example, we know that being more active can improve our sleep; or having a better night’s sleep could boost our energy levels to perform physical activity the next day. But what we don’t know is the optimal balance of time spent in each of these behaviours to maximise cognitive performance.
“In this study we explored how different uses of time impact your brain. We found that higher levels of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity – that is, activity performed at higher intensities that increases your heart rate and breathing – was related to better cognitive performance.
“Specifically, ‘huff-and-puff’ physical activity (like aerobic exercise) improves processing speed (how fast your brain thinks), executive function (how well you plan, focus, and multitask) and working memory (your ability to store information for short periods of time).
“Importantly, the opposite was also true: lower levels of this higher intensity physical activity were related to poorer performance on these tests.”
The findings were consistent across different genetic and demographic backgrounds. Interestingly, the findings did not extend to episodic memory (the what, where and when details of an event) or visuospatial function outcomes (your ability to recognise places and navigate through spaces).
Co-researcher, Dr Audrey Collins, says understanding the interplay between different activities could empower older people to make positive health changes.
“There are only 24 hours in a day, so every day, we make decisions about how we spend our time. For example, if we sleep for eight hours, then there’s 16 hours remaining for waking behaviours like physical activity or sedentary behaviour; that’s the basic reality,” Dr Collins says.
“Our results show that how we choose to spend our time across the 24-hour day may be differentially related to our brain health.
“Understanding that we need to prioritise physical activity – such as physical activity that gets our heart rates up, according to our findings – is the key.
“With one in six people in the world expected to be 60 years or older by 2030, we need to make sure we are supporting and empowering people to age well.
“In this instance, we hope that knowledge is power: boost your physical activity and boost your brain health to stay fit and well as you age. However, these results are cross-sectional and need to be tested longitudinally and experimentally.”
Notes for editors:
* The IGNITE study was conducted at the University of Pittsburgh (Pittsburgh, PA), University of Kansas Medical Center (Kansas City, KS), and Northeastern University (Boston, MA) and involved a large, well-characterised sample of cognitively unimpaired older adults. Participants were, on average, 69.8 years of age, predominantly female (70%), and self-reported as inactive.
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Contacts for interview: Dr Maddison Mellow E: Maddison.Mellow@unisa.edu.au
Dr Audrey Collins E: CFD.ExternalComm@adventhealth.com
Media contact: Annabel Mansfield M: +61 479 182 489 E: Annabel.Mansfield@unisa.edu.au
US Senate News:
Source: United States Senator Jacky Rosen (D-NV)
WASHINGTON, DC – U.S. Senator Jacky Rosen (D-NV) joined colleagues in a letter to the Acting Director of the Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS) expressing serious concerns regarding President Trump’s call to eliminate the only federal agency dedicated to supporting the nation’s libraries and museums through federal LSTA grants. In the letter, the lawmakers called on the Administration to ensure continued funding, in accordance with federal law, for libraries, museums, and the critical programs and services that many Nevada communities rely on.
“The consequences of eliminating IMLS will be devastating for states, local communities, and the millions of Americans who rely on these institutions every day,” wrote the lawmakers. “These institutions are critical pillars of educational opportunity, cultural preservation, civic engagement, and economic development in our communities.”
“Museums and libraries are the cornerstone of our society that serve as protected spaces for people to learn, engage with their community, and build curiosity,” the lawmakers’ letter continued. “We urge you to uphold the law, immediately disburse all awarded LSTA grant funding to our states, […] and reverse any actions that jeopardize the future of the libraries and museums our communities rely on.”
The full letter can be found HERE.
In 2023, nearly 640,000 Nevadans benefited directly from an LSTA grant-funded program, including:
Nevada’s Talking Books Library, a program to provide reading materials to blind or disabled individuals with an emphasis on supporting disabled veterans;
Access to academic and research databases for K-12 schools and all of Nevada’s public universities and community colleges;
Youth and summer reading programs, and continuing education and training programs hosted at libraries across the state;
Traditional language and culture-based learning programs for the Pyramid Lake and Walker River Paiute Tribes; and
Continued maintenance and upgrades at the Discovery Children’s Museum in Las Vegas.
Without intervention, all of the programs described above will be cut and ended immediately or quickly discontinued as federal funding they receive through LSTA grants will be paused, cancelled, or revoked.
Senator Rosen has been fighting back against reckless cuts to education resources and their impacts on children and our communities. Last month, she joined Senate colleagues in a letter to Secretary of Education Linda McMahon condemning the Administration’s reckless and illegal firing of half of the workforce at the Department. Senator Rosen also issued a statement denouncing President Trump’s executive order attempting to dismantle the Department of Education.
Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)
ROSEMONT, Ill., April 21, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Wintrust Financial Corporation (“Wintrust”, “the Company”, “we” or “our”) (Nasdaq: WTFC) announced record quarterly net income of $189.0 million, or $2.69 per diluted common share, for the first quarter of 2025, compared to net income of $185.4 million, or $2.63 per diluted common share in the fourth quarter of 2024. Pre-tax, pre-provision income (non-GAAP) totaled a record $277.0 million, compared to $270.1 million for the fourth quarter of 2024.
Timothy S. Crane, President and Chief Executive Officer, commented, “Building on our record results in 2024, we are pleased with our strong start to the year. Our balanced business model supported disciplined loan growth, which was funded by robust deposit growth in the first quarter of 2025.”
Additionally, Mr. Crane noted, “Net interest margin in the first quarter increased by five basis points to 3.56% compared to the fourth quarter of 2024. The improvement in net interest margin was primarily attributed to decreased funding costs. The higher net interest margin and balance sheet growth supported record net interest income levels in the first quarter of 2025.”
Highlights of the first quarter of 2025:
Comparative information to the fourth quarter of 2024, unless otherwise noted
Mr. Crane noted, “The Company exhibited disciplined and consistent loan growth, as loans increased by $653 million compared to the prior quarter, or 6% on an annualized basis. Loan pipelines are strong and we remain prudent in our review of credit opportunities, ensuring our loan growth adheres to our conservative credit standards. Strong deposit growth of $1.1 billion, or 8% on an annualized basis, in the first quarter of 2025 outpaced loan growth, which resulted in our loans-to-deposits ratio ending the quarter at 90.9%. Non-interest bearing deposits totaled $11.2 billion and comprised 21% of total deposits at the end of the first quarter of 2025. We continue to leverage our enviable market positioning to generate deposits, grow loans and expand our franchise value.”
Commenting on credit quality, Mr. Crane stated, “Prudent credit management, involving in-depth reviews of the portfolio, has led to positive outcomes by proactively identifying and resolving problem credits in a timely fashion. We continue to be conservative, diversified, and maintain our consistently strong credit standards. We believe the Company’s reserves are appropriate and we remain committed to maintaining credit quality as evidenced by our improved net charge-offs, stable levels of non-performing loans and our core loan allowance for credit losses of 1.37%.”
In summary, Mr. Crane concluded, “Overall, we are proud of our first quarter results and believe we are well-positioned to continue our strong momentum as we navigate the macroeconomic uncertainty in 2025. The first quarter results highlighted the quality of our core deposit franchise and multifaceted nature of our business model, which uniquely positions us to be successful. Anticipated solid loan growth in the second quarter, combined with a stable net interest margin should result in higher levels of net interest income in the second quarter of 2025. Increasing our long-term franchise value and net interest income, coupled with disciplined expense control and maintaining our conservative credit standards, remain our focus in 2025.”
The graphs shown on pages 3-7 illustrate certain financial highlights of the first quarter of 2025 as well as historical financial performance. See “Supplemental Non-GAAP Financial Measures/Ratios” at Table 17 for additional information with respect to non-GAAP financial measures/ratios, including the reconciliations to the corresponding GAAP financial measures/ratios.
Graphs available at the following link: http://ml.globenewswire.com/Resource/Download/cdbdc506-1b5a-4776-ae2e-e0b14106e712
SUMMARY OF RESULTS:
BALANCE SHEET
Total assets increased $1.0 billion in the first quarter of 2025 as compared to the fourth quarter of 2024. Total loans increased by $653.4 million as compared to the fourth quarter of 2024. The increase in loans was primarily driven by growth in the commercial and premium finance life insurance loan portfolios.
Total liabilities increased by $734.2 million in the first quarter of 2025 as compared to the fourth quarter of 2024, driven by a $1.1 billion increase in total deposits. Robust organic deposit growth in the first quarter of 2025 was driven by our diverse deposit product offerings. Non-interest bearing deposits as a percentage of total deposits were 21% at March 31, 2025, relatively stable compared to recent quarters. The Company’s loans-to-deposits ratio ended the quarter at 90.9%.
For more information regarding changes in the Company’s balance sheet, see Consolidated Statements of Condition and Table 1 through Table 3 in this report.
NET INTEREST INCOME
For the first quarter of 2025, net interest income totaled $526.5 million, an increase of $1.3 million as compared to the fourth quarter of 2024, primarily due to improvement in net interest margin and growth in the balance sheet, partially offset by two fewer calendar days in the quarter.
Net interest margin increased to 3.54% (3.56% on a fully taxable-equivalent basis, non-GAAP) during the first quarter of 2025, up five basis points compared to the fourth quarter of 2024. The yield on earning assets declined 11 basis points during the first quarter of 2025 primarily due to a 15 basis point decrease in loan yields. The net free funds contribution declined six basis points compared to the fourth quarter of 2024. These declines were more than offset by a 22 basis point reduction in funding cost, primarily due to a 23 basis point decline in the rate paid on interest-bearing deposits, compared to the fourth quarter of 2024.
For more information regarding net interest income, see Table 4 through Table 7 in this report.
ASSET QUALITY
The allowance for credit losses totaled $448.4 million as of March 31, 2025, an increase from $437.1 million as of December 31, 2024. A provision for credit losses totaling $24.0 million was recorded for the first quarter of 2025 as compared to $17.0 million recorded in the fourth quarter of 2024. The higher provision for credit losses recognized in the first quarter of 2025 is primarily attributable to impacts related to the macroeconomic outlook. Future economic performance remains uncertain, thus downside risks to the baseline scenario, including widening credit spreads and lower valuations in financial markets, were considered to derive a qualitative addition to the provision for the first quarter of 2025. For more information regarding the allowance for credit losses and provision for credit losses, see Table 10 in this report.
Management believes the allowance for credit losses is appropriate to account for expected credit losses. The Company is required to estimate expected credit losses over the life of the Company’s financial assets as of the reporting date. There can be no assurances, however, that future losses will not significantly exceed the amounts provided for, thereby affecting future results of operations. A summary of the allowance for credit losses calculated for the loan components in each portfolio as of March 31, 2025, December 31, 2024, and September 30, 2024 is shown on Table 11 of this report.
Net charge-offs totaled $12.6 million in the first quarter of 2025, a decrease of $3.3 million as compared to $15.9 million of net charge-offs in the fourth quarter of 2024. Net charge-offs as a percentage of average total loans were 11 basis points in the first quarter of 2025 on an annualized basis, compared to 13 basis points on an annualized basis in the fourth quarter of 2024. For more information regarding net charge-offs, see Table 9 in this report.
The Company’s delinquency rates remain low and manageable. For more information regarding past due loans, see Table 12 in this report.
Non-performing assets and non-performing loans have remained relatively stable compared to prior quarters. Non-performing assets totaled $195.0 million and comprised 0.30% of total assets as of March 31, 2025, as compared to $193.9 million, or 0.30% of total assets, as of December 31, 2024. Non-performing loans totaled $172.4 million and comprised 0.35% of total loans at March 31, 2025, as compared to $170.8 million and 0.36% of total loans at December 31, 2024. For more information regarding non-performing assets, see Table 13 in this report.
NON-INTEREST INCOME
Non-interest income totaled $116.6 million in the first quarter of 2025, increasing $3.2 million, as compared to $113.5 million in the fourth quarter of 2024.
Wealth management revenue decreased by $4.7 million in the first quarter of 2025, as compared to the fourth quarter of 2024. Revenue in the first quarter of 2025 was impacted by the transition of systems and support for brokerage and certain private client business to a new third party in the current quarter, as well as lower assets under management due to lower market valuations. The reduction in revenue was driven by anticipated slowdown in activity from the transition, market conditions, and certain offsets to expenses. Wealth management revenue is comprised of the trust and asset management revenue of Wintrust Private Trust Company and Great Lakes Advisors, the brokerage commissions, managed money fees and insurance product commissions at Wintrust Investments and fees from tax-deferred like-kind exchange services provided by the Chicago Deferred Exchange Company.
Mortgage banking revenue totaling $20.5 million in the first quarter of 2025 was essentially unchanged compared to the fourth quarter of 2024. For more information regarding mortgage banking revenue, see Table 15 in this report.
The Company recognized $19.4 million in service charges on deposit accounts in the first quarter of 2025, as compared to $18.9 million in the fourth quarter of 2024. The $0.5 million increase in the first quarter of 2025 was primarily due to increased commercial account fees.
The Company recognized $3.2 million in net gains on investment securities in the first quarter of 2025 as compared to $2.8 million in net losses in the fourth quarter of 2024. The net gains in the first quarter of 2025 were primarily the result of unrealized gains on the Company’s equity investment securities with a readily determinable fair value.
For more information regarding non-interest income, see Table 14 in this report.
NON-INTEREST EXPENSE
Non-interest expenses totaled $366.1 million in the first quarter of 2025, decreasing $2.4 million as compared to $368.5 million in the fourth quarter of 2024.
Salaries and employee benefits expense decreased by $0.6 million in the first quarter of 2025 as compared to the fourth quarter of 2024. This was primarily driven by decreased commissions and incentives compensation expense related to lower mortgage originations and wealth management revenue in the quarter partially offset by higher salaries expense which can be attributed to annual merit increases taking effect in the first quarter of the year.
Advertising and marketing expenses in the first quarter of 2025 totaled $12.3 million, which was a $0.8 million decrease as compared to the fourth quarter of 2024. The reduction in the first quarter is primarily due to timing of marketing campaigns, sponsorship arrangements and other investments.
Professional fees expense totaled $9.0 million in the first quarter of 2025, resulting in a decrease of $2.3 million as compared to the fourth quarter of 2024. The decrease in the current quarter relates primarily to decreased fees on consulting services. Professional fees include legal, audit, and tax fees, external loan review costs, consulting arrangements and normal regulatory exam assessments.
Travel and entertainment expense totaled $5.3 million in the first quarter of 2025 which decreased $2.9 million as compared to the fourth quarter of 2024. The decrease is primarily due to seasonal corporate events that occur during the fourth quarter.
The Macatawa Bank acquisition related costs were $2.7 million in the first quarter of 2025, primarily driven by consulting expenses, employee retention and severance costs, and contracted resource costs.
For more information regarding non-interest expense, see Table 16 in this report.
INCOME TAXES
The Company recorded income tax expense of $64.0 million in the first quarter compared to $67.7 million in the fourth quarter of 2024. The effective tax rates were 25.30% in the first quarter of 2025 compared to 26.76% in the fourth quarter of 2024. The effective tax rates were partially impacted by the tax effects related to share-based compensation, which fluctuate based on the Company’s stock price and timing of employee stock option exercises and vesting of other share-based awards. The Company recorded net excess tax benefits of $3.7 million in the first quarter of 2025, compared to excess tax benefits of $50,000 in the fourth quarter of 2024 related to share-based compensation.
BUSINESS SUMMARY
Community Banking
Through community banking, the Company provides banking and financial services primarily to individuals, small to mid-sized businesses, local governmental units and institutional clients residing primarily in the local areas the Company services. In the first quarter of 2025, community banking increased its commercial, commercial real estate and residential real estate loan portfolios.
Mortgage banking revenue was $20.5 million for both the first quarter of 2025, and the fourth quarter of 2024. See Table 15 for more detail. Service charges on deposit accounts totaled $19.4 million in the first quarter of 2025 as compared to $18.9 million in the fourth quarter of 2024. The Company’s gross commercial and commercial real estate loan pipelines remained solid as of March 31, 2025 indicating momentum for expected continued loan growth in the second quarter of 2025.
Specialty Finance
Through specialty finance, the Company offers financing of insurance premiums for businesses and individuals, equipment financing through structured loans and lease products to customers in a variety of industries, accounts receivable financing and value-added, out-sourced administrative services and other services. Originations within the insurance premium financing receivables portfolios were $4.8 billion during the first quarter of 2025. Average balances increased by $213.4 million, as compared to the fourth quarter of 2024. The Company’s leasing divisions’ portfolio balances increased in the first quarter of 2025, with capital leases, loans, and equipment on operating leases of $2.7 billion, $1.1 billion, and $280.5 million as of March 31, 2025 respectively, as compared to $2.5 billion, $1.1 billion, and $278.3 million as of December 31, 2024, respectively. Revenues from the Company’s out-sourced administrative services business were $1.4 million in the first quarter of 2025, which was relatively stable compared to the fourth quarter of 2024.
Wealth Management
Through wealth management, the Company offers a full range of wealth management services, including trust and investment services, tax-deferred like-kind exchange services, asset management, and securities brokerage services. See “Items Impacting Comparative Results,” regarding the sale of the Company’s Retirement Benefits Advisors (“RBA”) division during the first quarter of 2024. Wealth management revenue totaled $34.0 million in the first quarter of 2025, down slightly as compared to the fourth quarter of 2024. At March 31, 2025, the Company’s wealth management subsidiaries had approximately $51.1 billion of assets under administration, which included $8.4 billion of assets owned by the Company and its subsidiary banks.
ITEMS IMPACTING COMPARATIVE FINANCIAL RESULTS
Business Combination
On August 1, 2024, the Company completed its previously announced acquisition of Macatawa, the parent company of Macatawa Bank. In conjunction with the completed acquisition, the Company issued approximately 4.7 million shares of common stock. Macatawa operates 26 full-service branches located throughout communities in Kent, Ottawa and northern Allegan counties in the state of Michigan. Macatawa offers a full range of banking, retail and commercial lending, wealth management and ecommerce services to individuals, businesses and governmental entities. As of August 1, 2024, Macatawa had fair values of approximately $2.9 billion in assets, $2.3 billion in deposits and $1.3 billion in loans. As of March 31, 2025, the Company recorded goodwill of approximately $142.1 million on the purchase.
Division Sale
In the first quarter of 2024, the Company sold its RBA division and recorded a net gain of approximately $19.3 million ($20.0 million in other non-interest income from the sale, offset by $0.7 million in commissions/incentive compensation expense).
WINTRUST FINANCIAL CORPORATION
Key Operating Measures
Wintrust’s key operating measures and growth rates for the first quarter of 2025, as compared to the fourth quarter of 2024 (sequential quarter) and first quarter of 2024 (linked quarter), are shown in the table below:
| % or (1)basis point (bp) change from 4th Quarter 2024 |
% or basis point (bp) change from 1st Quarter 2024 |
||||||||||||||||||
| Three Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in thousands, except per share data) | Mar 31, 2025 | Dec 31, 2024 | Mar 31, 2024 | ||||||||||||||||
| Net income | $ | 189,039 | $ | 185,362 | $ | 187,294 | 2 | % | 1 | % | |||||||||
| Pre-tax income, excluding provision for credit losses (non-GAAP) (2) | 277,018 | 270,060 | 271,629 | 3 | 2 | ||||||||||||||
| Net income per common share – Diluted | 2.69 | 2.63 | 2.89 | 2 | (7 | ) | |||||||||||||
| Cash dividends declared per common share | 0.50 | 0.45 | 0.45 | 11 | 11 | ||||||||||||||
| Net revenue (3) | 643,108 | 638,599 | 604,774 | 1 | 6 | ||||||||||||||
| Net interest income | 526,474 | 525,148 | 464,194 | 0 | 13 | ||||||||||||||
| Net interest margin | 3.54 | % | 3.49 | % | 3.57 | % | 5 | bps | (3 | ) | bps | ||||||||
| Net interest margin – fully taxable-equivalent (non-GAAP) (2) | 3.56 | 3.51 | 3.59 | 5 | (3 | ) | |||||||||||||
| Net overhead ratio (4) | 1.58 | 1.60 | 1.39 | (2 | ) | 19 | |||||||||||||
| Return on average assets | 1.20 | 1.16 | 1.35 | 4 | (15 | ) | |||||||||||||
| Return on average common equity | 12.21 | 11.82 | 14.42 | 39 | (221 | ) | |||||||||||||
| Return on average tangible common equity (non-GAAP) (2) | 14.72 | 14.29 | 16.75 | 43 | (203 | ) | |||||||||||||
| At end of period | |||||||||||||||||||
| Total assets | $ | 65,870,066 | $ | 64,879,668 | $ | 57,576,933 | 6 | % | 14 | % | |||||||||
| Total loans (5) | 48,708,390 | 48,055,037 | 43,230,706 | 6 | 13 | ||||||||||||||
| Total deposits | 53,570,038 | 52,512,349 | 46,448,858 | 8 | 15 | ||||||||||||||
| Total shareholders’ equity | 6,600,537 | 6,344,297 | 5,436,400 | 16 | 21 | ||||||||||||||
(1) Period-end balance sheet percentage changes are annualized.
(2) See Table 17: Supplemental Non-GAAP Financial Measures/Ratios for additional information on this performance measure/ratio.
(3) Net revenue is net interest income plus non-interest income.
(4) The net overhead ratio is calculated by netting total non-interest expense and total non-interest income, annualizing this amount, and dividing by that period’s average total assets. A lower ratio indicates a higher degree of efficiency.
(5) Excludes mortgage loans held-for-sale.
Certain returns, yields, performance ratios, or quarterly growth rates are “annualized” in this presentation to represent an annual time period. This is done for analytical purposes to better discern, for decision-making purposes, underlying performance trends when compared to full-year or year-over-year amounts. For example, a 5% growth rate for a quarter would represent an annualized 20% growth rate. Additional supplemental financial information showing quarterly trends can be found on the Company’s website at www.wintrust.com by choosing “Financial Reports” under the “Investor Relations” heading, and then choosing “Financial Highlights.”
WINTRUST FINANCIAL CORPORATION
Selected Financial Highlights
| Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in thousands, except per share data) | Mar 31, 2025 | Dec 31, 2024 | Sep 30, 2024 | Jun 30, 2024 | Mar 31, 2024 | |||||||||||||||
| Selected Financial Condition Data (at end of period): | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total assets | $ | 65,870,066 | $ | 64,879,668 | $ | 63,788,424 | $ | 59,781,516 | $ | 57,576,933 | ||||||||||
| Total loans (1) | 48,708,390 | 48,055,037 | 47,067,447 | 44,675,531 | 43,230,706 | |||||||||||||||
| Total deposits | 53,570,038 | 52,512,349 | 51,404,966 | 48,049,026 | 46,448,858 | |||||||||||||||
| Total shareholders’ equity | 6,600,537 | 6,344,297 | 6,399,714 | 5,536,628 | 5,436,400 | |||||||||||||||
| Selected Statements of Income Data: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Net interest income | $ | 526,474 | $ | 525,148 | $ | 502,583 | $ | 470,610 | $ | 464,194 | ||||||||||
| Net revenue (2) | 643,108 | 638,599 | 615,730 | 591,757 | 604,774 | |||||||||||||||
| Net income | 189,039 | 185,362 | 170,001 | 152,388 | 187,294 | |||||||||||||||
| Pre-tax income, excluding provision for credit losses (non-GAAP) (3) | 277,018 | 270,060 | 255,043 | 251,404 | 271,629 | |||||||||||||||
| Net income per common share – Basic | 2.73 | 2.68 | 2.51 | 2.35 | 2.93 | |||||||||||||||
| Net income per common share – Diluted | 2.69 | 2.63 | 2.47 | 2.32 | 2.89 | |||||||||||||||
| Cash dividends declared per common share | 0.50 | 0.45 | 0.45 | 0.45 | 0.45 | |||||||||||||||
| Selected Financial Ratios and Other Data: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Performance Ratios: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Net interest margin | 3.54 | % | 3.49 | % | 3.49 | % | 3.50 | % | 3.57 | % | ||||||||||
| Net interest margin – fully taxable-equivalent (non-GAAP) (3) | 3.56 | 3.51 | 3.51 | 3.52 | 3.59 | |||||||||||||||
| Non-interest income to average assets | 0.74 | 0.71 | 0.74 | 0.85 | 1.02 | |||||||||||||||
| Non-interest expense to average assets | 2.32 | 2.31 | 2.36 | 2.38 | 2.41 | |||||||||||||||
| Net overhead ratio (4) | 1.58 | 1.60 | 1.62 | 1.53 | 1.39 | |||||||||||||||
| Return on average assets | 1.20 | 1.16 | 1.11 | 1.07 | 1.35 | |||||||||||||||
| Return on average common equity | 12.21 | 11.82 | 11.63 | 11.61 | 14.42 | |||||||||||||||
| Return on average tangible common equity (non-GAAP) (3) | 14.72 | 14.29 | 13.92 | 13.49 | 16.75 | |||||||||||||||
| Average total assets | $ | 64,107,042 | $ | 63,594,105 | $ | 60,915,283 | $ | 57,493,184 | $ | 55,602,695 | ||||||||||
| Average total shareholders’ equity | 6,460,941 | 6,418,403 | 5,990,429 | 5,450,173 | 5,440,457 | |||||||||||||||
| Average loans to average deposits ratio | 92.3 | % | 91.9 | % | 93.8 | % | 95.1 | % | 94.5 | % | ||||||||||
| Period-end loans to deposits ratio | 90.9 | 91.5 | 91.6 | 93.0 | 93.1 | |||||||||||||||
| Common Share Data at end of period: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Market price per common share | $ | 112.46 | $ | 124.71 | $ | 108.53 | $ | 98.56 | $ | 104.39 | ||||||||||
| Book value per common share | 92.47 | 89.21 | 90.06 | 82.97 | 81.38 | |||||||||||||||
| Tangible book value per common share (non-GAAP) (3) | 78.83 | 75.39 | 76.15 | 72.01 | 70.40 | |||||||||||||||
| Common shares outstanding | 66,919,325 | 66,495,227 | 66,481,543 | 61,760,139 | 61,736,715 | |||||||||||||||
| Other Data at end of period: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Common equity to assets ratio | 9.4 | % | 9.1 | % | 9.4 | % | 8.6 | % | 8.7 | % | ||||||||||
| Tangible common equity ratio (non-GAAP) (3) | 8.1 | 7.8 | 8.1 | 7.5 | 7.6 | |||||||||||||||
| Tier 1 leverage ratio (5) | 9.6 | 9.4 | 9.6 | 9.3 | 9.4 | |||||||||||||||
| Risk-based capital ratios: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Tier 1 capital ratio (5) | 10.8 | 10.7 | 10.6 | 10.3 | 10.3 | |||||||||||||||
| Common equity tier 1 capital ratio (5) | 10.1 | 9.9 | 9.8 | 9.5 | 9.5 | |||||||||||||||
| Total capital ratio (5) | 12.5 | 12.3 | 12.2 | 12.1 | 12.2 | |||||||||||||||
| Allowance for credit losses (6) | $ | 448,387 | $ | 437,060 | $ | 436,193 | $ | 437,560 | $ | 427,504 | ||||||||||
| Allowance for loan and unfunded lending-related commitment losses to total loans | 0.92 | % | 0.91 | % | 0.93 | % | 0.98 | % | 0.99 | % | ||||||||||
| Number of: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Bank subsidiaries | 16 | 16 | 16 | 15 | 15 | |||||||||||||||
| Banking offices | 208 | 205 | 203 | 177 | 176 | |||||||||||||||
(1) Excludes mortgage loans held-for-sale.
(2) Net revenue is net interest income plus non-interest income.
(3) See Table 17: Supplemental Non-GAAP Financial Measures/Ratios for additional information on this performance measure/ratio.
(4) The net overhead ratio is calculated by netting total non-interest expense and total non-interest income, annualizing this amount, and dividing by that period’s average total assets. A lower ratio indicates a higher degree of efficiency.
(5) Capital ratios for current quarter-end are estimated.
(6) The allowance for credit losses includes the allowance for loan losses, the allowance for unfunded lending-related commitments and the allowance for held-to-maturity securities losses.
WINTRUST FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CONDITION
| (Unaudited) | (Unaudited) | (Unaudited) | (Unaudited) | |||||||||||||||||
| Mar 31, | Dec 31, | Sep 30, | Jun 30, | Mar 31, | ||||||||||||||||
| (In thousands) | 2025 | 2024 | 2024 | 2024 | 2024 | |||||||||||||||
| Assets | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Cash and due from banks | $ | 616,216 | $ | 452,017 | $ | 725,465 | $ | 415,462 | $ | 379,825 | ||||||||||
| Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements | 63 | 6,519 | 5,663 | 62 | 61 | |||||||||||||||
| Interest-bearing deposits with banks | 4,238,237 | 4,409,753 | 3,648,117 | 2,824,314 | 2,131,077 | |||||||||||||||
| Available-for-sale securities, at fair value | 4,220,305 | 4,141,482 | 3,912,232 | 4,329,957 | 4,387,598 | |||||||||||||||
| Held-to-maturity securities, at amortized cost | 3,564,490 | 3,613,263 | 3,677,420 | 3,755,924 | 3,810,015 | |||||||||||||||
| Trading account securities | — | 4,072 | 3,472 | 4,134 | 2,184 | |||||||||||||||
| Equity securities with readily determinable fair value | 270,442 | 215,412 | 125,310 | 112,173 | 119,777 | |||||||||||||||
| Federal Home Loan Bank and Federal Reserve Bank stock | 281,893 | 281,407 | 266,908 | 256,495 | 224,657 | |||||||||||||||
| Brokerage customer receivables | — | 18,102 | 16,662 | 13,682 | 13,382 | |||||||||||||||
| Mortgage loans held-for-sale, at fair value | 316,804 | 331,261 | 461,067 | 411,851 | 339,884 | |||||||||||||||
| Loans, net of unearned income | 48,708,390 | 48,055,037 | 47,067,447 | 44,675,531 | 43,230,706 | |||||||||||||||
| Allowance for loan losses | (378,207 | ) | (364,017 | ) | (360,279 | ) | (363,719 | ) | (348,612 | ) | ||||||||||
| Net loans | 48,330,183 | 47,691,020 | 46,707,168 | 44,311,812 | 42,882,094 | |||||||||||||||
| Premises, software and equipment, net | 776,679 | 779,130 | 772,002 | 722,295 | 744,769 | |||||||||||||||
| Lease investments, net | 280,472 | 278,264 | 270,171 | 275,459 | 283,557 | |||||||||||||||
| Accrued interest receivable and other assets | 1,598,255 | 1,739,334 | 1,721,090 | 1,671,334 | 1,580,142 | |||||||||||||||
| Trade date securities receivable | 463,023 | — | 551,031 | — | — | |||||||||||||||
| Goodwill | 796,932 | 796,942 | 800,780 | 655,955 | 656,181 | |||||||||||||||
| Other acquisition-related intangible assets | 116,072 | 121,690 | 123,866 | 20,607 | 21,730 | |||||||||||||||
| Total assets | $ | 65,870,066 | $ | 64,879,668 | $ | 63,788,424 | $ | 59,781,516 | $ | 57,576,933 | ||||||||||
| Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Deposits: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Non-interest-bearing | $ | 11,201,859 | $ | 11,410,018 | $ | 10,739,132 | $ | 10,031,440 | $ | 9,908,183 | ||||||||||
| Interest-bearing | 42,368,179 | 41,102,331 | 40,665,834 | 38,017,586 | 36,540,675 | |||||||||||||||
| Total deposits | 53,570,038 | 52,512,349 | 51,404,966 | 48,049,026 | 46,448,858 | |||||||||||||||
| Federal Home Loan Bank advances | 3,151,309 | 3,151,309 | 3,171,309 | 3,176,309 | 2,676,751 | |||||||||||||||
| Other borrowings | 529,269 | 534,803 | 647,043 | 606,579 | 575,408 | |||||||||||||||
| Subordinated notes | 298,360 | 298,283 | 298,188 | 298,113 | 437,965 | |||||||||||||||
| Junior subordinated debentures | 253,566 | 253,566 | 253,566 | 253,566 | 253,566 | |||||||||||||||
| Accrued interest payable and other liabilities | 1,466,987 | 1,785,061 | 1,613,638 | 1,861,295 | 1,747,985 | |||||||||||||||
| Total liabilities | 59,269,529 | 58,535,371 | 57,388,710 | 54,244,888 | 52,140,533 | |||||||||||||||
| Shareholders’ Equity: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Preferred stock | 412,500 | 412,500 | 412,500 | 412,500 | 412,500 | |||||||||||||||
| Common stock | 67,007 | 66,560 | 66,546 | 61,825 | 61,798 | |||||||||||||||
| Surplus | 2,494,347 | 2,482,561 | 2,470,228 | 1,964,645 | 1,954,532 | |||||||||||||||
| Treasury stock | (9,156 | ) | (6,153 | ) | (6,098 | ) | (5,760 | ) | (5,757 | ) | ||||||||||
| Retained earnings | 4,045,854 | 3,897,164 | 3,748,715 | 3,615,616 | 3,498,475 | |||||||||||||||
| Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (410,015 | ) | (508,335 | ) | (292,177 | ) | (512,198 | ) | (485,148 | ) | ||||||||||
| Total shareholders’ equity | 6,600,537 | 6,344,297 | 6,399,714 | 5,536,628 | 5,436,400 | |||||||||||||||
| Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity | $ | 65,870,066 | $ | 64,879,668 | $ | 63,788,424 | $ | 59,781,516 | $ | 57,576,933 | ||||||||||
WINTRUST FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (UNAUDITED)
| Three Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in thousands, except per share data) | Mar 31, 2025 |
Dec 31, 2024 |
Sep 30, 2024 |
Jun 30, 2024 |
Mar 31, 2024 |
||||||||||||||
| Interest income | |||||||||||||||||||
| Interest and fees on loans | $ | 768,362 | $ | 789,038 | $ | 794,163 | $ | 749,812 | $ | 710,341 | |||||||||
| Mortgage loans held-for-sale | 4,246 | 5,623 | 6,233 | 5,434 | 4,146 | ||||||||||||||
| Interest-bearing deposits with banks | 36,766 | 46,256 | 32,608 | 19,731 | 16,658 | ||||||||||||||
| Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements | 179 | 53 | 277 | 17 | 19 | ||||||||||||||
| Investment securities | 72,016 | 67,066 | 69,592 | 69,779 | 69,678 | ||||||||||||||
| Trading account securities | 11 | 6 | 11 | 13 | 18 | ||||||||||||||
| Federal Home Loan Bank and Federal Reserve Bank stock | 5,307 | 5,157 | 5,451 | 4,974 | 4,478 | ||||||||||||||
| Brokerage customer receivables | 78 | 302 | 269 | 219 | 175 | ||||||||||||||
| Total interest income | 886,965 | 913,501 | 908,604 | 849,979 | 805,513 | ||||||||||||||
| Interest expense | |||||||||||||||||||
| Interest on deposits | 320,233 | 346,388 | 362,019 | 335,703 | 299,532 | ||||||||||||||
| Interest on Federal Home Loan Bank advances | 25,441 | 26,050 | 26,254 | 24,797 | 22,048 | ||||||||||||||
| Interest on other borrowings | 6,792 | 7,519 | 9,013 | 8,700 | 9,248 | ||||||||||||||
| Interest on subordinated notes | 3,714 | 3,733 | 3,712 | 5,185 | 5,487 | ||||||||||||||
| Interest on junior subordinated debentures | 4,311 | 4,663 | 5,023 | 4,984 | 5,004 | ||||||||||||||
| Total interest expense | 360,491 | 388,353 | 406,021 | 379,369 | 341,319 | ||||||||||||||
| Net interest income | 526,474 | 525,148 | 502,583 | 470,610 | 464,194 | ||||||||||||||
| Provision for credit losses | 23,963 | 16,979 | 22,334 | 40,061 | 21,673 | ||||||||||||||
| Net interest income after provision for credit losses | 502,511 | 508,169 | 480,249 | 430,549 | 442,521 | ||||||||||||||
| Non-interest income | |||||||||||||||||||
| Wealth management | 34,042 | 38,775 | 37,224 | 35,413 | 34,815 | ||||||||||||||
| Mortgage banking | 20,529 | 20,452 | 15,974 | 29,124 | 27,663 | ||||||||||||||
| Service charges on deposit accounts | 19,362 | 18,864 | 16,430 | 15,546 | 14,811 | ||||||||||||||
| Gains (losses) on investment securities, net | 3,196 | (2,835 | ) | 3,189 | (4,282 | ) | 1,326 | ||||||||||||
| Fees from covered call options | 3,446 | 2,305 | 988 | 2,056 | 4,847 | ||||||||||||||
| Trading (losses) gains, net | (64 | ) | (113 | ) | (130 | ) | 70 | 677 | |||||||||||
| Operating lease income, net | 15,287 | 15,327 | 15,335 | 13,938 | 14,110 | ||||||||||||||
| Other | 20,836 | 20,676 | 24,137 | 29,282 | 42,331 | ||||||||||||||
| Total non-interest income | 116,634 | 113,451 | 113,147 | 121,147 | 140,580 | ||||||||||||||
| Non-interest expense | |||||||||||||||||||
| Salaries and employee benefits | 211,526 | 212,133 | 211,261 | 198,541 | 195,173 | ||||||||||||||
| Software and equipment | 34,717 | 34,258 | 31,574 | 29,231 | 27,731 | ||||||||||||||
| Operating lease equipment | 10,471 | 10,263 | 10,518 | 10,834 | 10,683 | ||||||||||||||
| Occupancy, net | 20,778 | 20,597 | 19,945 | 19,585 | 19,086 | ||||||||||||||
| Data processing | 11,274 | 10,957 | 9,984 | 9,503 | 9,292 | ||||||||||||||
| Advertising and marketing | 12,272 | 13,097 | 18,239 | 17,436 | 13,040 | ||||||||||||||
| Professional fees | 9,044 | 11,334 | 9,783 | 9,967 | 9,553 | ||||||||||||||
| Amortization of other acquisition-related intangible assets | 5,618 | 5,773 | 4,042 | 1,122 | 1,158 | ||||||||||||||
| FDIC insurance | 10,926 | 10,640 | 10,512 | 10,429 | 14,537 | ||||||||||||||
| OREO expenses, net | 643 | 397 | (938 | ) | (259 | ) | 392 | ||||||||||||
| Other | 38,821 | 39,090 | 35,767 | 33,964 | 32,500 | ||||||||||||||
| Total non-interest expense | 366,090 | 368,539 | 360,687 | 340,353 | 333,145 | ||||||||||||||
| Income before taxes | 253,055 | 253,081 | 232,709 | 211,343 | 249,956 | ||||||||||||||
| Income tax expense | 64,016 | 67,719 | 62,708 | 58,955 | 62,662 | ||||||||||||||
| Net income | $ | 189,039 | $ | 185,362 | $ | 170,001 | $ | 152,388 | $ | 187,294 | |||||||||
| Preferred stock dividends | 6,991 | 6,991 | 6,991 | 6,991 | 6,991 | ||||||||||||||
| Net income applicable to common shares | $ | 182,048 | $ | 178,371 | $ | 163,010 | $ | 145,397 | $ | 180,303 | |||||||||
| Net income per common share – Basic | $ | 2.73 | $ | 2.68 | $ | 2.51 | $ | 2.35 | $ | 2.93 | |||||||||
| Net income per common share – Diluted | $ | 2.69 | $ | 2.63 | $ | 2.47 | $ | 2.32 | $ | 2.89 | |||||||||
| Cash dividends declared per common share | $ | 0.50 | $ | 0.45 | $ | 0.45 | $ | 0.45 | $ | 0.45 | |||||||||
| Weighted average common shares outstanding | 66,726 | 66,491 | 64,888 | 61,839 | 61,481 | ||||||||||||||
| Dilutive potential common shares | 923 | 1,233 | 1,053 | 926 | 928 | ||||||||||||||
| Average common shares and dilutive common shares | 67,649 | 67,724 | 65,941 | 62,765 | 62,409 | ||||||||||||||
TABLE 1: LOAN PORTFOLIO MIX AND GROWTH RATES
| % Growth From | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in thousands) | Mar 31, 2025 |
Dec 31, 2024 |
Sep 30, 2024 |
Jun 30, 2024 |
Mar 31, 2024 |
Dec 31, 2024 (1) |
Mar 31, 2024 |
|||||||||||||||||
| Balance: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mortgage loans held-for-sale, excluding early buy-out exercised loans guaranteed by U.S. government agencies | $ | 181,580 | $ | 189,774 | $ | 314,693 | $ | 281,103 | $ | 193,064 | (18 | )% | (6 | )% | ||||||||||
| Mortgage loans held-for-sale, early buy-out exercised loans guaranteed by U.S. government agencies | 135,224 | 141,487 | 146,374 | 130,748 | 146,820 | (18 | ) | (8 | ) | |||||||||||||||
| Total mortgage loans held-for-sale | $ | 316,804 | $ | 331,261 | $ | 461,067 | $ | 411,851 | $ | 339,884 | (18 | )% | (7 | )% | ||||||||||
| Core loans: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial and industrial | $ | 6,871,206 | $ | 6,867,422 | $ | 6,774,683 | $ | 6,236,290 | $ | 6,117,004 | 0 | % | 12 | % | ||||||||||
| Asset-based lending | 1,701,962 | 1,611,001 | 1,709,685 | 1,465,867 | 1,355,255 | 23 | 26 | |||||||||||||||||
| Municipal | 798,646 | 826,653 | 827,125 | 747,357 | 721,526 | (14 | ) | 11 | ||||||||||||||||
| Leases | 2,680,943 | 2,537,325 | 2,443,721 | 2,439,128 | 2,344,295 | 23 | 14 | |||||||||||||||||
| Commercial real estate | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Residential construction | 55,849 | 48,617 | 73,088 | 55,019 | 57,558 | 60 | (3 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
| Commercial construction | 2,086,797 | 2,065,775 | 1,984,240 | 1,866,701 | 1,748,607 | 4 | 19 | |||||||||||||||||
| Land | 306,235 | 319,689 | 346,362 | 338,831 | 344,149 | (17 | ) | (11 | ) | |||||||||||||||
| Office | 1,641,555 | 1,656,109 | 1,675,286 | 1,585,312 | 1,566,748 | (4 | ) | 5 | ||||||||||||||||
| Industrial | 2,677,555 | 2,628,576 | 2,527,932 | 2,307,455 | 2,190,200 | 8 | 22 | |||||||||||||||||
| Retail | 1,402,837 | 1,374,655 | 1,404,586 | 1,365,753 | 1,366,415 | 8 | 3 | |||||||||||||||||
| Multi-family | 3,091,314 | 3,125,505 | 3,193,339 | 2,988,940 | 2,922,432 | (4 | ) | 6 | ||||||||||||||||
| Mixed use and other | 1,652,759 | 1,685,018 | 1,588,584 | 1,439,186 | 1,437,328 | (8 | ) | 15 | ||||||||||||||||
| Home equity | 455,683 | 445,028 | 427,043 | 356,313 | 340,349 | 10 | 34 | |||||||||||||||||
| Residential real estate | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Residential real estate loans for investment | 3,561,417 | 3,456,009 | 3,252,649 | 2,933,157 | 2,746,916 | 12 | 30 | |||||||||||||||||
| Residential mortgage loans, early buy-out eligible loans guaranteed by U.S. government agencies | 86,952 | 114,985 | 92,355 | 88,503 | 90,911 | (99 | ) | (4 | ) | |||||||||||||||
| Residential mortgage loans, early buy-out exercised loans guaranteed by U.S. government agencies | 36,790 | 41,771 | 43,034 | 45,675 | 52,439 | (48 | ) | (30 | ) | |||||||||||||||
| Total core loans | $ | 29,108,500 | $ | 28,804,138 | $ | 28,363,712 | $ | 26,259,487 | $ | 25,402,132 | 4 | % | 15 | % | ||||||||||
| Niche loans: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Franchise | $ | 1,262,555 | $ | 1,268,521 | $ | 1,191,686 | $ | 1,150,460 | $ | 1,122,302 | (2 | )% | 12 | % | ||||||||||
| Mortgage warehouse lines of credit | 1,019,543 | 893,854 | 750,462 | 593,519 | 403,245 | 57 | NM | |||||||||||||||||
| Community Advantage – homeowners association | 525,492 | 525,446 | 501,645 | 491,722 | 475,832 | 0 | 10 | |||||||||||||||||
| Insurance agency lending | 1,070,979 | 1,044,329 | 1,048,686 | 1,030,119 | 964,022 | 10 | 11 | |||||||||||||||||
| Premium Finance receivables | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| U.S. property & casualty insurance | 6,486,663 | 6,447,625 | 6,253,271 | 6,142,654 | 6,113,993 | 2 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||
| Canada property & casualty insurance | 753,199 | 824,417 | 878,410 | 958,099 | 826,026 | (35 | ) | (9 | ) | |||||||||||||||
| Life insurance | 8,365,140 | 8,147,145 | 7,996,899 | 7,962,115 | 7,872,033 | 11 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||
| Consumer and other | 116,319 | 99,562 | 82,676 | 87,356 | 51,121 | 68 | NM | |||||||||||||||||
| Total niche loans | $ | 19,599,890 | $ | 19,250,899 | $ | 18,703,735 | $ | 18,416,044 | $ | 17,828,574 | 7 | % | 10 | % | ||||||||||
| Total loans, net of unearned income | $ | 48,708,390 | $ | 48,055,037 | $ | 47,067,447 | $ | 44,675,531 | $ | 43,230,706 | 6 | % | 13 | % | ||||||||||
(1) Annualized.
TABLE 2: DEPOSIT PORTFOLIO MIX AND GROWTH RATES
| % Growth From | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in thousands) | Mar 31, 2025 |
Dec 31, 2024 |
Sep 30, 2024 |
Jun 30, 2024 |
Mar 31, 2024 |
Dec 31, 2024 (1) |
Mar 31, 2024 | |||||||||||||||||
| Balance: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Non-interest-bearing | $ | 11,201,859 | $ | 11,410,018 | $ | 10,739,132 | $ | 10,031,440 | $ | 9,908,183 | (7 | )% | 13 | % | ||||||||||
| NOW and interest-bearing demand deposits | 6,340,168 | 5,865,546 | 5,466,932 | 5,053,909 | 5,720,947 | 33 | 11 | |||||||||||||||||
| Wealth management deposits (2) | 1,408,790 | 1,469,064 | 1,303,354 | 1,490,711 | 1,347,817 | (17 | ) | 5 | ||||||||||||||||
| Money market | 18,074,733 | 17,975,191 | 17,713,726 | 16,320,017 | 15,617,717 | 2 | 16 | |||||||||||||||||
| Savings | 6,576,251 | 6,372,499 | 6,183,249 | 5,882,179 | 5,959,774 | 13 | 10 | |||||||||||||||||
| Time certificates of deposit | 9,968,237 | 9,420,031 | 9,998,573 | 9,270,770 | 7,894,420 | 24 | 26 | |||||||||||||||||
| Total deposits | $ | 53,570,038 | $ | 52,512,349 | $ | 51,404,966 | $ | 48,049,026 | $ | 46,448,858 | 8 | % | 15 | % | ||||||||||
| Mix: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Non-interest-bearing | 21 | % | 22 | % | 21 | % | 21 | % | 21 | % | ||||||||||||||
| NOW and interest-bearing demand deposits | 12 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 12 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Wealth management deposits (2) | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Money market | 34 | 34 | 34 | 34 | 34 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Savings | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Time certificates of deposit | 18 | 18 | 19 | 19 | 17 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Total deposits | 100 | % | 100 | % | 100 | % | 100 | % | 100 | % | ||||||||||||||
(1) Annualized.
(2) Represents deposit balances of the Company’s subsidiary banks from brokerage customers of Wintrust Investments, Chicago Deferred Exchange Company, LLC (“CDEC”), and trust and asset management customers of the Company.
TABLE 3: TIME CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT MATURITY/RE-PRICING ANALYSIS
As of March 31, 2025
| (Dollars in thousands) | Total Time Certificates of Deposit |
Weighted-Average Rate of Maturing Time Certificates of Deposit |
|||||
| 1-3 months | $ | 3,845,120 | 4.34 | % | |||
| 4-6 months | 2,345,184 | 3.81 | |||||
| 7-9 months | 2,694,739 | 3.72 | |||||
| 10-12 months | 711,206 | 3.62 | |||||
| 13-18 months | 210,063 | 3.03 | |||||
| 19-24 months | 87,336 | 2.72 | |||||
| 24+ months | 74,589 | 2.47 | |||||
| Total | $ | 9,968,237 | 3.94 | % | |||
TABLE 4: QUARTERLY AVERAGE BALANCES
| Average Balance for three months ended, | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Mar 31, | Dec 31, | Sep 30, | Jun 30, | Mar 31, | ||||||||||||||||
| (In thousands) | 2025 | 2024 | 2024 | 2024 | 2024 | |||||||||||||||
| Interest-bearing deposits with banks, securities purchased under resale agreements and cash equivalents (1) | $ | 3,520,048 | $ | 3,934,016 | $ | 2,413,728 | $ | 1,485,481 | $ | 1,254,332 | ||||||||||
| Investment securities (2) | 8,409,735 | 8,090,271 | 8,276,576 | 8,203,764 | 8,349,796 | |||||||||||||||
| FHLB and FRB stock | 281,702 | 271,825 | 263,707 | 253,614 | 230,648 | |||||||||||||||
| Liquidity management assets (3) | $ | 12,211,485 | $ | 12,296,112 | $ | 10,954,011 | $ | 9,942,859 | $ | 9,834,776 | ||||||||||
| Other earning assets (3)(4) | 13,140 | 20,528 | 17,542 | 15,257 | 15,081 | |||||||||||||||
| Mortgage loans held-for-sale | 286,710 | 378,707 | 376,251 | 347,236 | 290,275 | |||||||||||||||
| Loans, net of unearned income (3)(5) | 47,833,380 | 47,153,014 | 45,920,586 | 43,819,354 | 42,129,893 | |||||||||||||||
| Total earning assets (3) | $ | 60,344,715 | $ | 59,848,361 | $ | 57,268,390 | $ | 54,124,706 | $ | 52,270,025 | ||||||||||
| Allowance for loan and investment security losses | (375,371 | ) | (367,238 | ) | (383,736 | ) | (360,504 | ) | (361,734 | ) | ||||||||||
| Cash and due from banks | 476,423 | 470,033 | 467,333 | 434,916 | 450,267 | |||||||||||||||
| Other assets | 3,661,275 | 3,642,949 | 3,563,296 | 3,294,066 | 3,244,137 | |||||||||||||||
| Total assets | $ | 64,107,042 | $ | 63,594,105 | $ | 60,915,283 | $ | 57,493,184 | $ | 55,602,695 | ||||||||||
| NOW and interest-bearing demand deposits | $ | 6,046,189 | $ | 5,601,672 | $ | 5,174,673 | $ | 4,985,306 | $ | 5,680,265 | ||||||||||
| Wealth management deposits | 1,574,480 | 1,430,163 | 1,362,747 | 1,531,865 | 1,510,203 | |||||||||||||||
| Money market accounts | 17,581,141 | 17,579,395 | 16,436,111 | 15,272,126 | 14,474,492 | |||||||||||||||
| Savings accounts | 6,479,444 | 6,288,727 | 6,096,746 | 5,878,844 | 5,792,118 | |||||||||||||||
| Time deposits | 9,406,126 | 9,702,948 | 9,598,109 | 8,546,172 | 7,148,456 | |||||||||||||||
| Interest-bearing deposits | $ | 41,087,380 | $ | 40,602,905 | $ | 38,668,386 | $ | 36,214,313 | $ | 34,605,534 | ||||||||||
| Federal Home Loan Bank advances | 3,151,309 | 3,160,658 | 3,178,973 | 3,096,920 | 2,728,849 | |||||||||||||||
| Other borrowings | 582,139 | 577,786 | 622,792 | 587,262 | 627,711 | |||||||||||||||
| Subordinated notes | 298,306 | 298,225 | 298,135 | 410,331 | 437,893 | |||||||||||||||
| Junior subordinated debentures | 253,566 | 253,566 | 253,566 | 253,566 | 253,566 | |||||||||||||||
| Total interest-bearing liabilities | $ | 45,372,700 | $ | 44,893,140 | $ | 43,021,852 | $ | 40,562,392 | $ | 38,653,553 | ||||||||||
| Non-interest-bearing deposits | 10,732,156 | 10,718,738 | 10,271,613 | 9,879,134 | 9,972,646 | |||||||||||||||
| Other liabilities | 1,541,245 | 1,563,824 | 1,631,389 | 1,601,485 | 1,536,039 | |||||||||||||||
| Equity | 6,460,941 | 6,418,403 | 5,990,429 | 5,450,173 | 5,440,457 | |||||||||||||||
| Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity | $ | 64,107,042 | $ | 63,594,105 | $ | 60,915,283 | $ | 57,493,184 | $ | 55,602,695 | ||||||||||
| Net free funds/contribution (6) | $ | 14,972,015 | $ | 14,955,221 | $ | 14,246,538 | $ | 13,562,314 | $ | 13,616,472 | ||||||||||
(1) Includes interest-bearing deposits from banks and securities purchased under resale agreements with original maturities of greater than three months. Cash equivalents include federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements with original maturities of three months or less.
(2) Investment securities includes investment securities classified as available-for-sale and held-to-maturity, and equity securities with readily determinable fair values. Equity securities without readily determinable fair values are included within other assets.
(3) See Table 17: Supplemental Non-GAAP Financial Measures/Ratios for additional information on this performance measure/ratio.
(4) Other earning assets include brokerage customer receivables and trading account securities.
(5) Loans, net of unearned income, include non-accrual loans.
(6) Net free funds are the difference between total average earning assets and total average interest-bearing liabilities. The estimated contribution to net interest margin from net free funds is calculated using the rate paid for total interest-bearing liabilities.
TABLE 5: QUARTERLY NET INTEREST INCOME
| Net Interest Income for three months ended, | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Mar 31, | Dec 31, | Sep 30, | Jun 30, | Mar 31, | ||||||||||||||||
| (In thousands) | 2025 | 2024 | 2024 | 2024 | 2024 | |||||||||||||||
| Interest income: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest-bearing deposits with banks, securities purchased under resale agreements and cash equivalents | $ | 36,945 | $ | 46,308 | $ | 32,885 | $ | 19,748 | $ | 16,677 | ||||||||||
| Investment securities | 72,706 | 67,783 | 70,260 | 70,346 | 70,228 | |||||||||||||||
| FHLB and FRB stock | 5,307 | 5,157 | 5,451 | 4,974 | 4,478 | |||||||||||||||
| Liquidity management assets (1) | $ | 114,958 | $ | 119,248 | $ | 108,596 | $ | 95,068 | $ | 91,383 | ||||||||||
| Other earning assets (1) | 92 | 310 | 282 | 235 | 198 | |||||||||||||||
| Mortgage loans held-for-sale | 4,246 | 5,623 | 6,233 | 5,434 | 4,146 | |||||||||||||||
| Loans, net of unearned income (1) | 770,568 | 791,390 | 796,637 | 752,117 | 712,587 | |||||||||||||||
| Total interest income | $ | 889,864 | $ | 916,571 | $ | 911,748 | $ | 852,854 | $ | 808,314 | ||||||||||
| Interest expense: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| NOW and interest-bearing demand deposits | $ | 33,600 | $ | 31,695 | $ | 30,971 | $ | 32,719 | $ | 34,896 | ||||||||||
| Wealth management deposits | 8,606 | 9,412 | 10,158 | 10,294 | 10,461 | |||||||||||||||
| Money market accounts | 146,374 | 159,945 | 167,382 | 155,100 | 137,984 | |||||||||||||||
| Savings accounts | 35,923 | 38,402 | 42,892 | 41,063 | 39,071 | |||||||||||||||
| Time deposits | 95,730 | 106,934 | 110,616 | 96,527 | 77,120 | |||||||||||||||
| Interest-bearing deposits | $ | 320,233 | $ | 346,388 | $ | 362,019 | $ | 335,703 | $ | 299,532 | ||||||||||
| Federal Home Loan Bank advances | 25,441 | 26,050 | 26,254 | 24,797 | 22,048 | |||||||||||||||
| Other borrowings | 6,792 | 7,519 | 9,013 | 8,700 | 9,248 | |||||||||||||||
| Subordinated notes | 3,714 | 3,733 | 3,712 | 5,185 | 5,487 | |||||||||||||||
| Junior subordinated debentures | 4,311 | 4,663 | 5,023 | 4,984 | 5,004 | |||||||||||||||
| Total interest expense | $ | 360,491 | $ | 388,353 | $ | 406,021 | $ | 379,369 | $ | 341,319 | ||||||||||
| Less: Fully taxable-equivalent adjustment | (2,899 | ) | (3,070 | ) | (3,144 | ) | (2,875 | ) | (2,801 | ) | ||||||||||
| Net interest income (GAAP) (2) | 526,474 | 525,148 | 502,583 | 470,610 | 464,194 | |||||||||||||||
| Fully taxable-equivalent adjustment | 2,899 | 3,070 | 3,144 | 2,875 | 2,801 | |||||||||||||||
| Net interest income, fully taxable-equivalent (non-GAAP) (2) | $ | 529,373 | $ | 528,218 | $ | 505,727 | $ | 473,485 | $ | 466,995 | ||||||||||
(1) Interest income on tax-advantaged loans, trading securities and investment securities reflects a taxable-equivalent adjustment based on the marginal federal corporate tax rate in effect as of the applicable period.
(2) See Table 17: Supplemental Non-GAAP Financial Measures/Ratios for additional information on this performance measure/ratio.
TABLE 6: QUARTERLY NET INTEREST MARGIN
| Net Interest Margin for three months ended, | |||||||||||||||
| Mar 31, 2025 |
Dec 31, 2024 |
Sep 30, 2024 |
Jun 30, 2024 |
Mar 31, 2024 |
|||||||||||
| Yield earned on: | |||||||||||||||
| Interest-bearing deposits with banks, securities purchased under resale agreements and cash equivalents | 4.26 | % | 4.68 | % | 5.42 | % | 5.35 | % | 5.35 | % | |||||
| Investment securities | 3.51 | 3.33 | 3.38 | 3.45 | 3.38 | ||||||||||
| FHLB and FRB stock | 7.64 | 7.55 | 8.22 | 7.89 | 7.81 | ||||||||||
| Liquidity management assets | 3.82 | % | 3.86 | % | 3.94 | % | 3.85 | % | 3.74 | % | |||||
| Other earning assets | 2.84 | 6.01 | 6.38 | 6.23 | 5.25 | ||||||||||
| Mortgage loans held-for-sale | 6.01 | 5.91 | 6.59 | 6.29 | 5.74 | ||||||||||
| Loans, net of unearned income | 6.53 | 6.68 | 6.90 | 6.90 | 6.80 | ||||||||||
| Total earning assets | 5.98 | % | 6.09 | % | 6.33 | % | 6.34 | % | 6.22 | % | |||||
| Rate paid on: | |||||||||||||||
| NOW and interest-bearing demand deposits | 2.25 | % | 2.25 | % | 2.38 | % | 2.64 | % | 2.47 | % | |||||
| Wealth management deposits | 2.22 | 2.62 | 2.97 | 2.70 | 2.79 | ||||||||||
| Money market accounts | 3.38 | 3.62 | 4.05 | 4.08 | 3.83 | ||||||||||
| Savings accounts | 2.25 | 2.43 | 2.80 | 2.81 | 2.71 | ||||||||||
| Time deposits | 4.13 | 4.38 | 4.58 | 4.54 | 4.34 | ||||||||||
| Interest-bearing deposits | 3.16 | % | 3.39 | % | 3.72 | % | 3.73 | % | 3.48 | % | |||||
| Federal Home Loan Bank advances | 3.27 | 3.28 | 3.29 | 3.22 | 3.25 | ||||||||||
| Other borrowings | 4.73 | 5.18 | 5.76 | 5.96 | 5.92 | ||||||||||
| Subordinated notes | 5.05 | 4.98 | 4.95 | 5.08 | 5.04 | ||||||||||
| Junior subordinated debentures | 6.90 | 7.32 | 7.88 | 7.91 | 7.94 | ||||||||||
| Total interest-bearing liabilities | 3.22 | % | 3.44 | % | 3.75 | % | 3.76 | % | 3.55 | % | |||||
| Interest rate spread (1)(2) | 2.76 | % | 2.65 | % | 2.58 | % | 2.58 | % | 2.67 | % | |||||
| Less: Fully taxable-equivalent adjustment | (0.02 | ) | (0.02 | ) | (0.02 | ) | (0.02 | ) | (0.02 | ) | |||||
| Net free funds/contribution (3) | 0.80 | 0.86 | 0.93 | 0.94 | 0.92 | ||||||||||
| Net interest margin (GAAP) (2) | 3.54 | % | 3.49 | % | 3.49 | % | 3.50 | % | 3.57 | % | |||||
| Fully taxable-equivalent adjustment | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | ||||||||||
| Net interest margin, fully taxable-equivalent (non-GAAP) (2) | 3.56 | % | 3.51 | % | 3.51 | % | 3.52 | % | 3.59 | % | |||||
(1) Interest rate spread is the difference between the yield earned on earning assets and the rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities.
(2) See Table 17: Supplemental Non-GAAP Financial Measures/Ratios for additional information on this performance measure/ratio.
(3) Net free funds are the difference between total average earning assets and total average interest-bearing liabilities. The estimated contribution to net interest margin from net free funds is calculated using the rate paid for total interest-bearing liabilities.
TABLE 7: INTEREST RATE SENSITIVITY
As an ongoing part of its financial strategy, the Company attempts to manage the impact of fluctuations in market interest rates on net interest income. Management measures its exposure to changes in interest rates by modeling many different interest rate scenarios.
The following interest rate scenarios display the percentage change in net interest income over a one-year time horizon assuming increases and decreases of 100 and 200 basis points as compared to projected net interest income in a scenario with no assumed rate changes. The Static Shock Scenario results incorporate actual cash flows and repricing characteristics for balance sheet instruments following an instantaneous, parallel change in market rates based upon a static (i.e. no growth or constant) balance sheet. Conversely, the Ramp Scenario results incorporate management’s projections of future volume and pricing of each of the product lines following a gradual, parallel change in market rates over twelve months. Actual results may differ from these simulated results due to timing, magnitude, and frequency of interest rate changes as well as changes in market conditions and management strategies. The interest rate sensitivity for both the Static Shock and Ramp Scenario is as follows:
| Static Shock Scenario | +200 Basis Points |
+100 Basis Points |
-100 Basis Points |
-200 Basis Points |
||||||||
| Mar 31, 2025 | (1.8 | )% | (0.6 | )% | (0.2 | )% | (1.2 | )% | ||||
| Dec 31, 2024 | (1.6 | ) | (0.6 | ) | (0.3 | ) | (1.5 | ) | ||||
| Sep 30, 2024 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 0.4 | (0.9 | ) | |||||||
| Jun 30, 2024 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 0.6 | (0.0 | ) | |||||||
| Mar 31, 2024 | 1.9 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.6 | ||||||||
| Ramp Scenario | +200 Basis Points |
+100 Basis Points |
-100 Basis Points |
-200 Basis Points |
|||||||
| Mar 31, 2025 | 0.2 | % | 0.2 | % | (0.1 | )% | (0.5 | )% | |||
| Dec 31, 2024 | (0.2 | ) | (0.0 | ) | 0.0 | (0.3 | ) | ||||
| Sep 30, 2024 | 1.6 | 1.2 | 0.7 | 0.5 | |||||||
| Jun 30, 2024 | 1.2 | 1.0 | 0.9 | 1.0 | |||||||
| Mar 31, 2024 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 1.3 | 2.0 | |||||||
As shown above, the magnitude of potential changes in net interest income in various interest rate scenarios has continued to remain relatively neutral. As the current interest rate cycle progressed, management took action to reposition its sensitivity to interest rates. To this end, management has executed various derivative instruments including collars and receive fixed swaps to hedge variable rate loan exposures and originated a higher percentage of its loan originations in longer-term fixed-rate loans. The Company will continue to monitor current and projected interest rates and may execute additional derivatives to mitigate potential fluctuations in the net interest margin in future periods.
TABLE 8: MATURITIES AND SENSITIVITIES TO CHANGES IN INTEREST RATES
| Loans repricing or contractual maturity period | |||||||||||||||||||
| As of March 31, 2025 (In thousands) |
One year or less |
From one to five years |
From five to fifteen years | After fifteen years | Total | ||||||||||||||
| Commercial | |||||||||||||||||||
| Fixed rate | $ | 405,736 | $ | 3,600,171 | $ | 2,122,563 | $ | 20,444 | $ | 6,148,914 | |||||||||
| Variable rate | 9,781,709 | 703 | — | — | 9,782,412 | ||||||||||||||
| Total commercial | $ | 10,187,445 | $ | 3,600,874 | $ | 2,122,563 | $ | 20,444 | $ | 15,931,326 | |||||||||
| Commercial real estate | |||||||||||||||||||
| Fixed rate | $ | 658,413 | $ | 2,762,221 | $ | 365,181 | $ | 63,593 | $ | 3,849,408 | |||||||||
| Variable rate | 9,054,583 | 10,843 | 67 | — | 9,065,493 | ||||||||||||||
| Total commercial real estate | $ | 9,712,996 | $ | 2,773,064 | $ | 365,248 | $ | 63,593 | $ | 12,914,901 | |||||||||
| Home equity | |||||||||||||||||||
| Fixed rate | $ | 8,881 | $ | 838 | $ | — | $ | 17 | $ | 9,736 | |||||||||
| Variable rate | 445,947 | — | — | — | 445,947 | ||||||||||||||
| Total home equity | $ | 454,828 | $ | 838 | $ | — | $ | 17 | $ | 455,683 | |||||||||
| Residential real estate | |||||||||||||||||||
| Fixed rate | $ | 13,336 | $ | 4,473 | $ | 74,883 | $ | 1,055,143 | $ | 1,147,835 | |||||||||
| Variable rate | 97,815 | 623,879 | 1,815,630 | — | 2,537,324 | ||||||||||||||
| Total residential real estate | $ | 111,151 | $ | 628,352 | $ | 1,890,513 | $ | 1,055,143 | $ | 3,685,159 | |||||||||
| Premium finance receivables – property & casualty | |||||||||||||||||||
| Fixed rate | $ | 7,135,963 | $ | 103,899 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 7,239,862 | |||||||||
| Variable rate | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| Total premium finance receivables – property & casualty | $ | 7,135,963 | $ | 103,899 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 7,239,862 | |||||||||
| Premium finance receivables – life insurance | |||||||||||||||||||
| Fixed rate | $ | 350,802 | $ | 207,832 | $ | 4,000 | $ | 4,248 | $ | 566,882 | |||||||||
| Variable rate | 7,798,258 | — | — | — | 7,798,258 | ||||||||||||||
| Total premium finance receivables – life insurance | $ | 8,149,060 | $ | 207,832 | $ | 4,000 | $ | 4,248 | $ | 8,365,140 | |||||||||
| Consumer and other | |||||||||||||||||||
| Fixed rate | $ | 44,731 | $ | 7,937 | $ | 883 | $ | 914 | $ | 54,465 | |||||||||
| Variable rate | 61,854 | — | — | — | 61,854 | ||||||||||||||
| Total consumer and other | $ | 106,585 | $ | 7,937 | $ | 883 | $ | 914 | $ | 116,319 | |||||||||
| Total per category | |||||||||||||||||||
| Fixed rate | $ | 8,617,862 | $ | 6,687,371 | $ | 2,567,510 | $ | 1,144,359 | $ | 19,017,102 | |||||||||
| Variable rate | 27,240,166 | 635,425 | 1,815,697 | — | 29,691,288 | ||||||||||||||
| Total loans, net of unearned income | $ | 35,858,028 | $ | 7,322,796 | $ | 4,383,207 | $ | 1,144,359 | $ | 48,708,390 | |||||||||
| Less: Existing cash flow hedging derivatives (1) | (6,700,000 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
| Total loans repricing or maturing in one year or less, adjusted for cash flow hedging activity | $ | 29,158,028 | |||||||||||||||||
| Variable Rate Loan Pricing by Index: | |||||||||||||||||||
| SOFR tenors (2) | $ | 18,328,835 | |||||||||||||||||
| 12- month CMT (3) | 6,722,305 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Prime | 3,420,624 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Fed Funds | 819,437 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Other U.S. Treasury tenors | 190,187 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Other | 209,900 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Total variable rate | $ | 29,691,288 | |||||||||||||||||
(1) Excludes cash flow hedges with future effective starting dates.
(2) SOFR – Secured Overnight Financing Rate.
(3) CMT – Constant Maturity Treasury Rate.
Graph available at the following link: http://ml.globenewswire.com/Resource/Download/bebf97a7-5d4d-430d-a436-ae832412a4db
Source: Bloomberg
As noted in the table on the previous page, the majority of the Company’s portfolio is tied to SOFR and CMT indices which, as shown in the table above, do not mirror the same changes as the Prime rate, which has historically moved when the Federal Reserve raises or lowers interest rates. Specifically, the Company has variable rate loans of $15.4 billion tied to one-month SOFR and $6.7 billion tied to twelve-month CMT. The above chart shows:
| Basis Point (bp) Change in | ||||||||||
| 1-month SOFR |
12- month CMT | Prime | ||||||||
| First Quarter 2025 | (1 | ) | bps | (13 | ) | bps | 0 | bps | ||
| Fourth Quarter 2024 | (52 | ) | 18 | (50 | ) | |||||
| Third Quarter 2024 | (49 | ) | (111 | ) | (50 | ) | ||||
| Second Quarter 2024 | 1 | 6 | 0 | |||||||
| First Quarter 2024 | (2 | ) | 24 | 0 | ||||||
TABLE 9: ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES
| Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Mar 31, | Dec 31, | Sep 30, | Jun 30, | Mar 31, | ||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in thousands) | 2025 | 2024 | 2024 | 2024 | 2024 | |||||||||||||||
| Allowance for credit losses at beginning of period | $ | 437,060 | $ | 436,193 | $ | 437,560 | $ | 427,504 | $ | 427,612 | ||||||||||
| Provision for credit losses – Other | 23,963 | 16,979 | 6,787 | 40,061 | 21,673 | |||||||||||||||
| Provision for credit losses – Day 1 on non-PCD assets acquired during the period | — | — | 15,547 | — | — | |||||||||||||||
| Initial allowance for credit losses recognized on PCD assets acquired during the period | — | — | 3,004 | — | — | |||||||||||||||
| Other adjustments | 4 | (187 | ) | 30 | (19 | ) | (31 | ) | ||||||||||||
| Charge-offs: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial | 9,722 | 5,090 | 22,975 | 9,584 | 11,215 | |||||||||||||||
| Commercial real estate | 454 | 1,037 | 95 | 15,526 | 5,469 | |||||||||||||||
| Home equity | — | — | — | — | 74 | |||||||||||||||
| Residential real estate | — | 114 | — | 23 | 38 | |||||||||||||||
| Premium finance receivables – property & casualty | 7,114 | 13,301 | 7,790 | 9,486 | 6,938 | |||||||||||||||
| Premium finance receivables – life insurance | 12 | — | 4 | — | — | |||||||||||||||
| Consumer and other | 147 | 189 | 154 | 137 | 107 | |||||||||||||||
| Total charge-offs | 17,449 | 19,731 | 31,018 | 34,756 | 23,841 | |||||||||||||||
| Recoveries: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial | 929 | 775 | 649 | 950 | 479 | |||||||||||||||
| Commercial real estate | 12 | 172 | 30 | 90 | 31 | |||||||||||||||
| Home equity | 216 | 194 | 101 | 35 | 29 | |||||||||||||||
| Residential real estate | 136 | 0 | 5 | 8 | 2 | |||||||||||||||
| Premium finance receivables – property & casualty | 3,487 | 2,646 | 3,436 | 3,658 | 1,519 | |||||||||||||||
| Premium finance receivables – life insurance | — | — | 41 | 5 | 8 | |||||||||||||||
| Consumer and other | 29 | 19 | 21 | 24 | 23 | |||||||||||||||
| Total recoveries | 4,809 | 3,806 | 4,283 | 4,770 | 2,091 | |||||||||||||||
| Net charge-offs | (12,640 | ) | (15,925 | ) | (26,735 | ) | (29,986 | ) | (21,750 | ) | ||||||||||
| Allowance for credit losses at period end | $ | 448,387 | $ | 437,060 | $ | 436,193 | $ | 437,560 | $ | 427,504 | ||||||||||
| Annualized net charge-offs (recoveries) by category as a percentage of its own respective category’s average: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial | 0.23 | % | 0.11 | % | 0.61 | % | 0.25 | % | 0.33 | % | ||||||||||
| Commercial real estate | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.00 | 0.53 | 0.19 | |||||||||||||||
| Home equity | (0.20 | ) | (0.18 | ) | (0.10 | ) | (0.04 | ) | 0.05 | |||||||||||
| Residential real estate | (0.02 | ) | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.01 | ||||||||||||||
| Premium finance receivables – property & casualty | 0.20 | 0.59 | 0.24 | 0.33 | 0.32 | |||||||||||||||
| Premium finance receivables – life insurance | 0.00 | — | (0.00 | ) | (0.00 | ) | (0.00 | ) | ||||||||||||
| Consumer and other | 0.45 | 0.63 | 0.63 | 0.56 | 0.42 | |||||||||||||||
| Total loans, net of unearned income | 0.11 | % | 0.13 | % | 0.23 | % | 0.28 | % | 0.21 | % | ||||||||||
| Loans at period end | $ | 48,708,390 | $ | 48,055,037 | $ | 47,067,447 | $ | 44,675,531 | $ | 43,230,706 | ||||||||||
| Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of loans at period end | 0.78 | % | 0.76 | % | 0.77 | % | 0.81 | % | 0.81 | % | ||||||||||
| Allowance for loan and unfunded lending-related commitment losses as a percentage of loans at period end | 0.92 | 0.91 | 0.93 | 0.98 | 0.99 | |||||||||||||||
PCD – Purchase Credit Deteriorated
TABLE 10: ALLOWANCE AND PROVISION FOR CREDIT LOSSES BY COMPONENT
| Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Mar 31, | Dec 31, | Sep 30, | Jun 30, | Mar 31, | ||||||||||||||||
| (In thousands) | 2025 | 2024 | 2024 | 2024 | 2024 | |||||||||||||||
| Provision for loan losses – Other | $ | 26,826 | $ | 19,852 | $ | 6,782 | $ | 45,111 | $ | 26,159 | ||||||||||
| Provision for credit losses – Day 1 on non-PCD assets acquired during the period | — | — | 15,547 | — | — | |||||||||||||||
| Provision for unfunded lending-related commitments losses – Other | (2,852 | ) | (2,851 | ) | 17 | (5,212 | ) | (4,468 | ) | |||||||||||
| Provision for held-to-maturity securities losses | (11 | ) | (22 | ) | (12 | ) | 162 | (18 | ) | |||||||||||
| Provision for credit losses | $ | 23,963 | $ | 16,979 | $ | 22,334 | $ | 40,061 | $ | 21,673 | ||||||||||
| Allowance for loan losses | $ | 378,207 | $ | 364,017 | $ | 360,279 | $ | 363,719 | $ | 348,612 | ||||||||||
| Allowance for unfunded lending-related commitments losses | 69,734 | 72,586 | 75,435 | 73,350 | 78,563 | |||||||||||||||
| Allowance for loan losses and unfunded lending-related commitments losses | 447,941 | 436,603 | 435,714 | 437,069 | 427,175 | |||||||||||||||
| Allowance for held-to-maturity securities losses | 446 | 457 | 479 | 491 | 329 | |||||||||||||||
| Allowance for credit losses | $ | 448,387 | $ | 437,060 | $ | 436,193 | $ | 437,560 | $ | 427,504 | ||||||||||
PCD – Purchase Credit Deteriorated
TABLE 11: ALLOWANCE BY LOAN PORTFOLIO
The table below summarizes the calculation of allowance for loan losses and allowance for unfunded lending-related commitments losses for the Company’s loan portfolios as well as core and niche portfolios, as of March 31, 2025, December 31, 2024 and September 30, 2024.
| As of Mar 31, 2025 | As of Dec 31, 2024 | As of Sep 30, 2024 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in thousands) | Recorded Investment |
Calculated Allowance |
% of its category’s balance |
Recorded Investment |
Calculated Allowance |
% of its category’s balance |
Recorded Investment |
Calculated Allowance |
% of its category’s balance |
|||||||||||||||
| Commercial: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial, industrial and other | $ | 15,931,326 | $ | 201,183 | 1.26 | % | $ | 15,574,551 | $ | 175,837 | 1.13 | % | $ | 15,247,693 | $ | 171,598 | 1.13 | % | ||||||
| Commercial real estate: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Construction and development | 2,448,881 | 71,388 | 2.92 | 2,434,081 | 87,236 | 3.58 | 2,403,690 | 97,949 | 4.07 | |||||||||||||||
| Non-construction | 10,466,020 | 138,622 | 1.32 | 10,469,863 | 135,620 | 1.30 | 10,389,727 | 133,195 | 1.28 | |||||||||||||||
| Total commercial real estate | $ | 12,914,901 | $ | 210,010 | 1.63 | % | $ | 12,903,944 | $ | 222,856 | 1.73 | % | $ | 12,793,417 | $ | 231,144 | 1.81 | % | ||||||
| Total commercial and commercial real estate | $ | 28,846,227 | $ | 411,193 | 1.43 | % | $ | 28,478,495 | $ | 398,693 | 1.40 | % | $ | 28,041,110 | $ | 402,742 | 1.44 | % | ||||||
| Home equity | 455,683 | 9,139 | 2.01 | 445,028 | 8,943 | 2.01 | 427,043 | 8,823 | 2.07 | |||||||||||||||
| Residential real estate | 3,685,159 | 10,652 | 0.29 | 3,612,765 | 10,335 | 0.29 | 3,388,038 | 9,745 | 0.29 | |||||||||||||||
| Premium finance receivables | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Property and casualty insurance | 7,239,862 | 15,310 | 0.21 | 7,272,042 | 17,111 | 0.24 | 7,131,681 | 13,045 | 0.18 | |||||||||||||||
| Life insurance | 8,365,140 | 729 | 0.01 | 8,147,145 | 709 | 0.01 | 7,996,899 | 698 | 0.01 | |||||||||||||||
| Consumer and other | 116,319 | 918 | 0.79 | 99,562 | 812 | 0.82 | 82,676 | 661 | 0.80 | |||||||||||||||
| Total loans, net of unearned income | $ | 48,708,390 | $ | 447,941 | 0.92 | % | $ | 48,055,037 | $ | 436,603 | 0.91 | % | $ | 47,067,447 | $ | 435,714 | 0.93 | % | ||||||
| Total core loans (1) | $ | 29,108,500 | $ | 397,664 | 1.37 | % | $ | 28,804,138 | $ | 392,319 | 1.36 | % | $ | 28,363,712 | $ | 396,394 | 1.40 | % | ||||||
| Total niche loans (1) | 19,599,890 | 50,277 | 0.26 | 19,250,899 | 44,284 | 0.23 | 18,703,735 | 39,320 | 0.21 | |||||||||||||||
(1) See Table 1 for additional detail on core and niche loans.
TABLE 12: LOAN PORTFOLIO AGING
| (In thousands) | Mar 31, 2025 | Dec 31, 2024 | Sep 30, 2024 | Jun 30, 2024 | Mar 31, 2024 | |||||||||||||||
| Loan Balances: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Nonaccrual | $ | 70,560 | $ | 73,490 | $ | 63,826 | $ | 51,087 | $ | 31,740 | ||||||||||
| 90+ days and still accruing | 46 | 104 | 20 | 304 | 27 | |||||||||||||||
| 60-89 days past due | 15,243 | 54,844 | 32,560 | 16,485 | 30,248 | |||||||||||||||
| 30-59 days past due | 97,397 | 92,551 | 46,057 | 36,358 | 77,715 | |||||||||||||||
| Current | 15,748,080 | 15,353,562 | 15,105,230 | 14,050,228 | 13,363,751 | |||||||||||||||
| Total commercial | $ | 15,931,326 | $ | 15,574,551 | $ | 15,247,693 | $ | 14,154,462 | $ | 13,503,481 | ||||||||||
| Commercial real estate | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Nonaccrual | $ | 26,187 | $ | 21,042 | $ | 42,071 | $ | 48,289 | $ | 39,262 | ||||||||||
| 90+ days and still accruing | — | — | 225 | — | — | |||||||||||||||
| 60-89 days past due | 6,995 | 10,521 | 13,439 | 6,555 | 16,713 | |||||||||||||||
| 30-59 days past due | 83,653 | 30,766 | 48,346 | 38,065 | 32,998 | |||||||||||||||
| Current | 12,798,066 | 12,841,615 | 12,689,336 | 11,854,288 | 11,544,464 | |||||||||||||||
| Total commercial real estate | $ | 12,914,901 | $ | 12,903,944 | $ | 12,793,417 | $ | 11,947,197 | $ | 11,633,437 | ||||||||||
| Home equity | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Nonaccrual | $ | 2,070 | $ | 1,117 | $ | 1,122 | $ | 1,100 | $ | 838 | ||||||||||
| 90+ days and still accruing | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
| 60-89 days past due | 984 | 1,233 | 1,035 | 275 | 212 | |||||||||||||||
| 30-59 days past due | 3,403 | 2,148 | 2,580 | 1,229 | 1,617 | |||||||||||||||
| Current | 449,226 | 440,530 | 422,306 | 353,709 | 337,682 | |||||||||||||||
| Total home equity | $ | 455,683 | $ | 445,028 | $ | 427,043 | $ | 356,313 | $ | 340,349 | ||||||||||
| Residential real estate | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Early buy-out loans guaranteed by U.S. government agencies (1) | $ | 123,742 | $ | 156,756 | $ | 135,389 | $ | 134,178 | $ | 143,350 | ||||||||||
| Nonaccrual | 22,522 | 23,762 | 17,959 | 18,198 | 17,901 | |||||||||||||||
| 90+ days and still accruing | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
| 60-89 days past due | 1,351 | 5,708 | 6,364 | 1,977 | — | |||||||||||||||
| 30-59 days past due | 38,943 | 18,917 | 2,160 | 130 | 24,523 | |||||||||||||||
| Current | 3,498,601 | 3,407,622 | 3,226,166 | 2,912,852 | 2,704,492 | |||||||||||||||
| Total residential real estate | $ | 3,685,159 | $ | 3,612,765 | $ | 3,388,038 | $ | 3,067,335 | $ | 2,890,266 | ||||||||||
| Premium finance receivables – property & casualty | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Nonaccrual | $ | 29,846 | $ | 28,797 | $ | 36,079 | $ | 32,722 | $ | 32,648 | ||||||||||
| 90+ days and still accruing | 18,081 | 16,031 | 18,235 | 22,427 | 25,877 | |||||||||||||||
| 60-89 days past due | 19,717 | 19,042 | 18,740 | 29,925 | 15,274 | |||||||||||||||
| 30-59 days past due | 39,459 | 68,219 | 30,204 | 45,927 | 59,729 | |||||||||||||||
| Current | 7,132,759 | 7,139,953 | 7,028,423 | 6,969,752 | 6,806,491 | |||||||||||||||
| Total Premium finance receivables – property & casualty | $ | 7,239,862 | $ | 7,272,042 | $ | 7,131,681 | $ | 7,100,753 | $ | 6,940,019 | ||||||||||
| Premium finance receivables – life insurance | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Nonaccrual | $ | — | $ | 6,431 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||
| 90+ days and still accruing | 2,962 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
| 60-89 days past due | 10,587 | 72,963 | 10,902 | 4,118 | 32,482 | |||||||||||||||
| 30-59 days past due | 29,924 | 36,405 | 74,432 | 17,693 | 100,137 | |||||||||||||||
| Current | 8,321,667 | 8,031,346 | 7,911,565 | 7,940,304 | 7,739,414 | |||||||||||||||
| Total Premium finance receivables – life insurance | $ | 8,365,140 | $ | 8,147,145 | $ | 7,996,899 | $ | 7,962,115 | $ | 7,872,033 | ||||||||||
| Consumer and other | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Nonaccrual | $ | 18 | $ | 2 | $ | 2 | $ | 3 | $ | 19 | ||||||||||
| 90+ days and still accruing | 98 | 47 | 148 | 121 | 47 | |||||||||||||||
| 60-89 days past due | 162 | 59 | 22 | 81 | 16 | |||||||||||||||
| 30-59 days past due | 542 | 882 | 264 | 366 | 210 | |||||||||||||||
| Current | 115,499 | 98,572 | 82,240 | 86,785 | 50,829 | |||||||||||||||
| Total consumer and other | $ | 116,319 | $ | 99,562 | $ | 82,676 | $ | 87,356 | $ | 51,121 | ||||||||||
| Total loans, net of unearned income | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Early buy-out loans guaranteed by U.S. government agencies (1) | $ | 123,742 | $ | 156,756 | $ | 135,389 | $ | 134,178 | $ | 143,350 | ||||||||||
| Nonaccrual | 151,203 | 154,641 | 161,059 | 151,399 | 122,408 | |||||||||||||||
| 90+ days and still accruing | 21,187 | 16,182 | 18,628 | 22,852 | 25,951 | |||||||||||||||
| 60-89 days past due | 55,039 | 164,370 | 83,062 | 59,416 | 94,945 | |||||||||||||||
| 30-59 days past due | 293,321 | 249,888 | 204,043 | 139,768 | 296,929 | |||||||||||||||
| Current | 48,063,898 | 47,313,200 | 46,465,266 | 44,167,918 | 42,547,123 | |||||||||||||||
| Total loans, net of unearned income | $ | 48,708,390 | $ | 48,055,037 | $ | 47,067,447 | $ | 44,675,531 | $ | 43,230,706 | ||||||||||
(1) Early buy-out loans are insured or guaranteed by the Federal Housing Administration or the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, subject to indemnifications and insurance limits for certain loans.
TABLE 13: NON-PERFORMING ASSETS(1)
| Mar 31, | Dec 31, | Sep 30, | Jun 30, | Mar 31, | |||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in thousands) | 2025 | 2024 | 2024 | 2024 | 2024 | ||||||||||||||
| Loans past due greater than 90 days and still accruing: | |||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial | $ | 46 | $ | 104 | $ | 20 | $ | 304 | $ | 27 | |||||||||
| Commercial real estate | — | — | 225 | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| Home equity | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| Residential real estate | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| Premium finance receivables – property & casualty | 18,081 | 16,031 | 18,235 | 22,427 | 25,877 | ||||||||||||||
| Premium finance receivables – life insurance | 2,962 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| Consumer and other | 98 | 47 | 148 | 121 | 47 | ||||||||||||||
| Total loans past due greater than 90 days and still accruing | 21,187 | 16,182 | 18,628 | 22,852 | 25,951 | ||||||||||||||
| Non-accrual loans: | |||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial | 70,560 | 73,490 | 63,826 | 51,087 | 31,740 | ||||||||||||||
| Commercial real estate | 26,187 | 21,042 | 42,071 | 48,289 | 39,262 | ||||||||||||||
| Home equity | 2,070 | 1,117 | 1,122 | 1,100 | 838 | ||||||||||||||
| Residential real estate | 22,522 | 23,762 | 17,959 | 18,198 | 17,901 | ||||||||||||||
| Premium finance receivables – property & casualty | 29,846 | 28,797 | 36,079 | 32,722 | 32,648 | ||||||||||||||
| Premium finance receivables – life insurance | — | 6,431 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| Consumer and other | 18 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 19 | ||||||||||||||
| Total non-accrual loans | 151,203 | 154,641 | 161,059 | 151,399 | 122,408 | ||||||||||||||
| Total non-performing loans: | |||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial | 70,606 | 73,594 | 63,846 | 51,391 | 31,767 | ||||||||||||||
| Commercial real estate | 26,187 | 21,042 | 42,296 | 48,289 | 39,262 | ||||||||||||||
| Home equity | 2,070 | 1,117 | 1,122 | 1,100 | 838 | ||||||||||||||
| Residential real estate | 22,522 | 23,762 | 17,959 | 18,198 | 17,901 | ||||||||||||||
| Premium finance receivables – property & casualty | 47,927 | 44,828 | 54,314 | 55,149 | 58,525 | ||||||||||||||
| Premium finance receivables – life insurance | 2,962 | 6,431 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| Consumer and other | 116 | 49 | 150 | 124 | 66 | ||||||||||||||
| Total non-performing loans | $ | 172,390 | $ | 170,823 | $ | 179,687 | $ | 174,251 | $ | 148,359 | |||||||||
| Other real estate owned | 22,625 | 23,116 | 13,682 | 19,731 | 14,538 | ||||||||||||||
| Total non-performing assets | $ | 195,015 | $ | 193,939 | $ | 193,369 | $ | 193,982 | $ | 162,897 | |||||||||
| Total non-performing loans by category as a percent of its own respective category’s period-end balance: | |||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial | 0.44 | % | 0.47 | % | 0.42 | % | 0.36 | % | 0.24 | % | |||||||||
| Commercial real estate | 0.20 | 0.16 | 0.33 | 0.40 | 0.34 | ||||||||||||||
| Home equity | 0.45 | 0.25 | 0.26 | 0.31 | 0.25 | ||||||||||||||
| Residential real estate | 0.61 | 0.66 | 0.53 | 0.59 | 0.62 | ||||||||||||||
| Premium finance receivables – property & casualty | 0.66 | 0.62 | 0.76 | 0.78 | 0.84 | ||||||||||||||
| Premium finance receivables – life insurance | 0.04 | 0.08 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| Consumer and other | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.18 | 0.14 | 0.13 | ||||||||||||||
| Total loans, net of unearned income | 0.35 | % | 0.36 | % | 0.38 | % | 0.39 | % | 0.34 | % | |||||||||
| Total non-performing assets as a percentage of total assets | 0.30 | % | 0.30 | % | 0.30 | % | 0.32 | % | 0.28 | % | |||||||||
| Allowance for loan losses and unfunded lending-related commitments losses as a percentage of non-accrual loans | 296.25 | % | 282.33 | % | 270.53 | % | 288.69 | % | 348.98 | % | |||||||||
(1) Excludes early buy-out loans guaranteed by U.S. government agencies. Early buy-out loans are insured or guaranteed by the Federal Housing Administration or the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, subject to indemnifications and insurance limits for certain loans.
Non-performing Loans Rollforward, excluding early buy-out loans guaranteed by U.S. government agencies
| Three Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||
| Mar 31, | Dec 31, | Sep 30, | Jun 30, | Mar 31, | |||||||||||||||
| (In thousands) | 2025 | 2024 | 2024 | 2024 | 2024 | ||||||||||||||
| Balance at beginning of period | $ | 170,823 | $ | 179,687 | $ | 174,251 | $ | 148,359 | $ | 139,030 | |||||||||
| Additions from becoming non-performing in the respective period | 27,721 | 30,931 | 42,335 | 54,376 | 23,142 | ||||||||||||||
| Additions from assets acquired in the respective period | — | — | 189 | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| Return to performing status | (1,207 | ) | (1,108 | ) | (362 | ) | (912 | ) | (490 | ) | |||||||||
| Payments received | (15,965 | ) | (12,219 | ) | (10,894 | ) | (9,611 | ) | (8,336 | ) | |||||||||
| Transfer to OREO and other repossessed assets | — | (17,897 | ) | (3,680 | ) | (6,945 | ) | (1,381 | ) | ||||||||||
| Charge-offs, net | (8,600 | ) | (5,612 | ) | (21,211 | ) | (7,673 | ) | (14,810 | ) | |||||||||
| Net change for premium finance receivables | (382 | ) | (2,959 | ) | (941 | ) | (3,343 | ) | 11,204 | ||||||||||
| Balance at end of period | $ | 172,390 | $ | 170,823 | $ | 179,687 | $ | 174,251 | $ | 148,359 | |||||||||
Other Real Estate Owned
| Three Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||
| Mar 31, | Dec 31, | Sep 30, | Jun 30, | Mar 31, | |||||||||||||||
| (In thousands) | 2025 | 2024 | 2024 | 2024 | 2024 | ||||||||||||||
| Balance at beginning of period | $ | 23,116 | $ | 13,682 | $ | 19,731 | $ | 14,538 | $ | 13,309 | |||||||||
| Disposals/resolved | — | (8,545 | ) | (9,729 | ) | (1,752 | ) | — | |||||||||||
| Transfers in at fair value, less costs to sell | — | 17,979 | 3,680 | 6,945 | 1,436 | ||||||||||||||
| Fair value adjustments | (491 | ) | — | — | — | (207 | ) | ||||||||||||
| Balance at end of period | $ | 22,625 | $ | 23,116 | $ | 13,682 | $ | 19,731 | $ | 14,538 | |||||||||
| Period End | |||||||||||||||||||
| Mar 31, | Dec 31, | Sep 30, | Jun 30, | Mar 31, | |||||||||||||||
| Balance by Property Type: | 2025 | 2024 | 2024 | 2024 | 2024 | ||||||||||||||
| Residential real estate | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 161 | $ | 1,146 | |||||||||
| Commercial real estate | 22,625 | 23,116 | 13,682 | 19,570 | 13,392 | ||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 22,625 | $ | 23,116 | $ | 13,682 | $ | 19,731 | $ | 14,538 | |||||||||
TABLE 14: NON-INTEREST INCOME
| Three Months Ended | Q1 2025 compared to Q4 2024 |
Q1 2025 compared to Q1 2024 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mar 31, | Dec 31, | Sep 30, | Jun 30, | Mar 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in thousands) | 2025 | 2024 | 2024 | 2024 | 2024 | $ Change | % Change | $ Change | % Change | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Brokerage | $ | 4,757 | $ | 5,328 | $ | 6,139 | $ | 5,588 | $ | 5,556 | $ | (571 | ) | (11 | )% | $ | (799 | ) | (14 | )% | |||||||||||
| Trust and asset management | 29,285 | 33,447 | 31,085 | 29,825 | 29,259 | (4,162 | ) | (12 | ) | 26 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total wealth management | 34,042 | 38,775 | 37,224 | 35,413 | 34,815 | (4,733 | ) | (12 | ) | (773 | ) | (2 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Mortgage banking | 20,529 | 20,452 | 15,974 | 29,124 | 27,663 | 77 | 0 | (7,134 | ) | (26 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Service charges on deposit accounts | 19,362 | 18,864 | 16,430 | 15,546 | 14,811 | 498 | 3 | 4,551 | 31 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Gains (losses) on investment securities, net | 3,196 | (2,835 | ) | 3,189 | (4,282 | ) | 1,326 | 6,031 | NM | 1,870 | NM | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Fees from covered call options | 3,446 | 2,305 | 988 | 2,056 | 4,847 | 1,141 | 50 | (1,401 | ) | (29 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Trading (losses) gains, net | (64 | ) | (113 | ) | (130 | ) | 70 | 677 | 49 | (43 | ) | (741 | ) | NM | |||||||||||||||||
| Operating lease income, net | 15,287 | 15,327 | 15,335 | 13,938 | 14,110 | (40 | ) | (0 | ) | 1,177 | 8 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Other: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest rate swap fees | 2,269 | 3,360 | 2,914 | 3,392 | 2,828 | (1,091 | ) | (32 | ) | (559 | ) | (20 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
| BOLI | 796 | 1,236 | 1,517 | 1,351 | 1,651 | (440 | ) | (36 | ) | (855 | ) | (52 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Administrative services | 1,393 | 1,347 | 1,450 | 1,322 | 1,217 | 46 | 3 | 176 | 14 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Foreign currency remeasurement (losses) gains | (183 | ) | (682 | ) | 696 | (145 | ) | (1,171 | ) | 499 | (73 | ) | 988 | (84 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
| Changes in fair value on EBOs and loans held-for-investment | 383 | 129 | 518 | 604 | (439 | ) | 254 | NM | 822 | NM | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Early pay-offs of capital leases | 768 | 514 | 532 | 393 | 430 | 254 | 49 | 338 | 79 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Miscellaneous | 15,410 | 14,772 | 16,510 | 22,365 | 37,815 | 638 | 4 | (22,405 | ) | (59 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total Other | 20,836 | 20,676 | 24,137 | 29,282 | 42,331 | 160 | 1 | (21,495 | ) | (51 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total Non-Interest Income | $ | 116,634 | $ | 113,451 | $ | 113,147 | $ | 121,147 | $ | 140,580 | $ | 3,183 | 3 | % | $ | (23,946 | ) | (17 | )% | ||||||||||||
NM – Not meaningful.
BOLI- Bank-owned life insurance.
EBO- Early buy-out.
TABLE 15: MORTGAGE BANKING
| Three Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in thousands) | Mar 31, 2025 |
Dec 31, 2024 |
Sep 30, 2024 |
Jun 30, 2024 |
Mar 31, 2024 |
||||||||||||||
| Originations: | |||||||||||||||||||
| Retail originations | $ | 348,468 | $ | 483,424 | $ | 527,408 | $ | 544,394 | $ | 331,504 | |||||||||
| Veterans First originations | 111,985 | 176,914 | 239,369 | 177,792 | 144,109 | ||||||||||||||
| Total originations for sale (A) | $ | 460,453 | $ | 660,338 | $ | 766,777 | $ | 722,186 | $ | 475,613 | |||||||||
| Originations for investment | 217,177 | 355,119 | 218,984 | 275,331 | 169,246 | ||||||||||||||
| Total originations | $ | 677,630 | $ | 1,015,457 | $ | 985,761 | $ | 997,517 | $ | 644,859 | |||||||||
| As a percentage of originations for sale: | |||||||||||||||||||
| Retail originations | 76 | % | 73 | % | 69 | % | 75 | % | 70 | % | |||||||||
| Veterans First originations | 24 | 27 | 31 | 25 | 30 | ||||||||||||||
| Purchases | 77 | % | 65 | % | 72 | % | 83 | % | 75 | % | |||||||||
| Refinances | 23 | 35 | 28 | 17 | 25 | ||||||||||||||
| Production Margin: | |||||||||||||||||||
| Production revenue (B) (1) | $ | 9,941 | $ | 6,993 | $ | 13,113 | $ | 14,990 | $ | 13,435 | |||||||||
| Total originations for sale (A) | $ | 460,453 | $ | 660,338 | $ | 766,777 | $ | 722,186 | $ | 475,613 | |||||||||
| Add: Current period end mandatory interest rate lock commitments to fund originations for sale (2) | 197,297 | 103,946 | 272,072 | 222,738 | 207,775 | ||||||||||||||
| Less: Prior period end mandatory interest rate lock commitments to fund originations for sale (2) | 103,946 | 272,072 | 222,738 | 207,775 | 119,624 | ||||||||||||||
| Total mortgage production volume (C) | $ | 553,804 | $ | 492,212 | $ | 816,111 | $ | 737,149 | $ | 563,764 | |||||||||
| Production margin (B / C) | 1.80 | % | 1.42 | % | 1.61 | % | 2.03 | % | 2.38 | % | |||||||||
| Mortgage Servicing: | |||||||||||||||||||
| Loans serviced for others (D) | $ | 12,402,352 | $ | 12,400,913 | $ | 12,253,361 | $ | 12,211,027 | $ | 12,051,392 | |||||||||
| Mortgage Servicing Rights (“MSR”), at fair value (E) | 196,307 | 203,788 | 186,308 | 204,610 | 201,044 | ||||||||||||||
| Percentage of MSRs to loans serviced for others (E / D) | 1.58 | % | 1.64 | % | 1.52 | % | 1.68 | % | 1.67 | % | |||||||||
| Servicing income | $ | 10,611 | $ | 10,731 | $ | 10,809 | $ | 10,586 | $ | 10,498 | |||||||||
| MSR Fair Value Asset Activity | |||||||||||||||||||
| MSR – FV at Beginning of Period | $ | 203,788 | $ | 186,308 | $ | 204,610 | $ | 201,044 | $ | 192,456 | |||||||||
| MSR – current period capitalization | 4,669 | 10,010 | 6,357 | 8,223 | 5,379 | ||||||||||||||
| MSR – collection of expected cash flows – paydowns | (1,590 | ) | (1,463 | ) | (1,598 | ) | (1,504 | ) | (1,444 | ) | |||||||||
| MSR – collection of expected cash flows – payoffs and repurchases | (3,046 | ) | (4,315 | ) | (5,730 | ) | (4,030 | ) | (2,942 | ) | |||||||||
| MSR – changes in fair value model assumptions | (7,514 | ) | 13,248 | (17,331 | ) | 877 | 7,595 | ||||||||||||
| MSR Fair Value at end of period | $ | 196,307 | $ | 203,788 | $ | 186,308 | $ | 204,610 | $ | 201,044 | |||||||||
| Summary of Mortgage Banking Revenue: | |||||||||||||||||||
| Operational: | |||||||||||||||||||
| Production revenue (1) | $ | 9,941 | $ | 6,993 | $ | 13,113 | $ | 14,990 | $ | 13,435 | |||||||||
| MSR – Current period capitalization | 4,669 | 10,010 | 6,357 | 8,223 | 5,379 | ||||||||||||||
| MSR – Collection of expected cash flows – paydowns | (1,590 | ) | (1,463 | ) | (1,598 | ) | (1,504 | ) | (1,444 | ) | |||||||||
| MSR – Collection of expected cash flows – pay offs | (3,046 | ) | (4,315 | ) | (5,730 | ) | (4,030 | ) | (2,942 | ) | |||||||||
| Servicing Income | 10,611 | 10,731 | 10,809 | 10,586 | 10,498 | ||||||||||||||
| Other Revenue | (172 | ) | (51 | ) | (67 | ) | 112 | (91 | ) | ||||||||||
| Total operational mortgage banking revenue | $ | 20,413 | $ | 21,905 | $ | 22,884 | $ | 28,377 | $ | 24,835 | |||||||||
| Fair Value: | |||||||||||||||||||
| MSR – changes in fair value model assumptions | $ | (7,514 | ) | $ | 13,248 | $ | (17,331 | ) | $ | 877 | $ | 7,595 | |||||||
| Gain (loss) on derivative contract held as an economic hedge, net | 4,897 | (11,452 | ) | 6,892 | (772 | ) | (2,577 | ) | |||||||||||
| Changes in FV on early buy-out loans guaranteed by US Govt (HFS) | 2,733 | (3,249 | ) | 3,529 | 642 | (2,190 | ) | ||||||||||||
| Total fair value mortgage banking revenue | $ | 116 | $ | (1,453 | ) | $ | (6,910 | ) | $ | 747 | $ | 2,828 | |||||||
| Total mortgage banking revenue | $ | 20,529 | $ | 20,452 | $ | 15,974 | $ | 29,124 | $ | 27,663 | |||||||||
(1) Production revenue represents revenue earned from the origination and subsequent sale of mortgages, including gains on loans sold and fees from originations, changes in other related financial instruments carried at fair value, processing and other related activities, and excludes servicing fees, changes in the fair value of servicing rights and changes to the mortgage recourse obligation and other non-production revenue.
(2) Certain volume adjusted for the estimated pull-through rate of the loan, which represents the Company’s best estimate of the likelihood that a committed loan will ultimately fund.
TABLE 16: NON-INTEREST EXPENSE
| Three Months Ended | Q1 2025 compared to Q4 2024 |
Q1 2025 compared to Q1 2024 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mar 31, | Dec 31, | Sep 30, | Jun 30, | Mar 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in thousands) | 2025 | 2024 | 2024 | 2024 | 2024 | $ Change | % Change | $ Change | % Change | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Salaries and employee benefits: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Salaries | $ | 123,917 | $ | 120,969 | $ | 118,971 | $ | 113,860 | $ | 112,172 | $ | 2,948 | 2 | % | $ | 11,745 | 10 | % | |||||||||||||
| Commissions and incentive compensation | 52,536 | 54,792 | 57,575 | 52,151 | 51,001 | (2,256 | ) | (4 | ) | 1,535 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Benefits | 35,073 | 36,372 | 34,715 | 32,530 | 32,000 | (1,299 | ) | (4 | ) | 3,073 | 10 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total salaries and employee benefits | 211,526 | 212,133 | 211,261 | 198,541 | 195,173 | (607 | ) | (0 | ) | 16,353 | 8 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Software and equipment | 34,717 | 34,258 | 31,574 | 29,231 | 27,731 | 459 | 1 | 6,986 | 25 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Operating lease equipment | 10,471 | 10,263 | 10,518 | 10,834 | 10,683 | 208 | 2 | (212 | ) | (2 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Occupancy, net | 20,778 | 20,597 | 19,945 | 19,585 | 19,086 | 181 | 1 | 1,692 | 9 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Data processing | 11,274 | 10,957 | 9,984 | 9,503 | 9,292 | 317 | 3 | 1,982 | 21 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Advertising and marketing | 12,272 | 13,097 | 18,239 | 17,436 | 13,040 | (825 | ) | (6 | ) | (768 | ) | (6 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Professional fees | 9,044 | 11,334 | 9,783 | 9,967 | 9,553 | (2,290 | ) | (20 | ) | (509 | ) | (5 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Amortization of other acquisition-related intangible assets | 5,618 | 5,773 | 4,042 | 1,122 | 1,158 | (155 | ) | (3 | ) | 4,460 | NM | ||||||||||||||||||||
| FDIC insurance | 10,926 | 10,640 | 10,512 | 10,429 | 9,381 | 286 | 3 | 1,545 | 16 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| FDIC insurance – special assessment | — | — | — | — | 5,156 | — | — | (5,156 | ) | (100 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| OREO expense, net | 643 | 397 | (938 | ) | (259 | ) | 392 | 246 | 62 | 251 | 64 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Other: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lending expenses, net of deferred origination costs | 5,866 | 6,448 | 4,995 | 5,335 | 5,078 | (582 | ) | (9 | ) | 788 | 16 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Travel and entertainment | 5,270 | 8,140 | 5,364 | 5,340 | 4,597 | (2,870 | ) | (35 | ) | 673 | 15 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Miscellaneous | 27,685 | 24,502 | 25,408 | 23,289 | 22,825 | 3,183 | 13 | 4,860 | 21 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total other | 38,821 | 39,090 | 35,767 | 33,964 | 32,500 | (269 | ) | (1 | ) | 6,321 | 19 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total Non-Interest Expense | $ | 366,090 | $ | 368,539 | $ | 360,687 | $ | 340,353 | $ | 333,145 | $ | (2,449 | ) | (1 | )% | $ | 32,945 | 10 | % | ||||||||||||
NM – Not meaningful.
TABLE 17: SUPPLEMENTAL NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES/RATIOS
The accounting and reporting policies of Wintrust conform to generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) in the United States and prevailing practices in the banking industry. However, certain non-GAAP performance measures and ratios are used by management to evaluate and measure the Company’s performance. These include taxable-equivalent net interest income (including its individual components), taxable-equivalent net interest margin (including its individual components), the taxable-equivalent efficiency ratio, tangible common equity ratio, tangible book value per common share, return on average tangible common equity, and pre-tax income, excluding provision for credit losses. Management believes that these measures and ratios provide users of the Company’s financial information a more meaningful view of the performance of the Company’s interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and of the Company’s operating efficiency. Other financial holding companies may define or calculate these measures and ratios differently.
Management reviews yields on certain asset categories and the net interest margin of the Company and its banking subsidiaries on a fully taxable-equivalent basis (“FTE”). In this non-GAAP presentation, net interest income is adjusted to reflect tax-exempt interest income on an equivalent before-tax basis using tax rates effective as of the end of the period. This measure ensures comparability of net interest income arising from both taxable and tax-exempt sources. Net interest income on a FTE basis is also used in the calculation of the Company’s efficiency ratio. The efficiency ratio, which is calculated by dividing non-interest expense by total taxable-equivalent net revenue (less securities gains or losses), measures how much it costs to produce one dollar of revenue. Securities gains or losses are excluded from this calculation to better match revenue from daily operations to operational expenses. Management considers the tangible common equity ratio and tangible book value per common share as useful measurements of the Company’s equity. The Company references the return on average tangible common equity as a measurement of profitability. Management considers pre-tax income, excluding provision for credit losses, as a useful measurement of the Company’s core net income.
| Three Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||
| Mar 31, | Dec 31, | Sep 30, | Jun 30, | Mar 31, | |||||||||||||||
| (Dollars and shares in thousands) | 2025 | 2024 | 2024 | 2024 | 2024 | ||||||||||||||
| Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Net Interest Margin and Efficiency Ratio: | |||||||||||||||||||
| (A) Interest Income (GAAP) | $ | 886,965 | $ | 913,501 | $ | 908,604 | $ | 849,979 | $ | 805,513 | |||||||||
| Taxable-equivalent adjustment: | |||||||||||||||||||
| – Loans | 2,206 | 2,352 | 2,474 | 2,305 | 2,246 | ||||||||||||||
| – Liquidity Management Assets | 690 | 716 | 668 | 567 | 550 | ||||||||||||||
| – Other Earning Assets | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 5 | ||||||||||||||
| (B) Interest Income (non-GAAP) | $ | 889,864 | $ | 916,571 | $ | 911,748 | $ | 852,854 | $ | 808,314 | |||||||||
| (C) Interest Expense (GAAP) | 360,491 | 388,353 | 406,021 | 379,369 | 341,319 | ||||||||||||||
| (D) Net Interest Income (GAAP) (A minus C) | $ | 526,474 | $ | 525,148 | $ | 502,583 | $ | 470,610 | $ | 464,194 | |||||||||
| (E) Net Interest Income (non-GAAP) (B minus C) | $ | 529,373 | $ | 528,218 | $ | 505,727 | $ | 473,485 | $ | 466,995 | |||||||||
| Net interest margin (GAAP) | 3.54 | % | 3.49 | % | 3.49 | % | 3.50 | % | 3.57 | % | |||||||||
| Net interest margin, fully taxable-equivalent (non-GAAP) | 3.56 | 3.51 | 3.51 | 3.52 | 3.59 | ||||||||||||||
| (F) Non-interest income | $ | 116,634 | $ | 113,451 | $ | 113,147 | $ | 121,147 | $ | 140,580 | |||||||||
| (G) Gains (losses) on investment securities, net | 3,196 | (2,835 | ) | 3,189 | (4,282 | ) | 1,326 | ||||||||||||
| (H) Non-interest expense | 366,090 | 368,539 | 360,687 | 340,353 | 333,145 | ||||||||||||||
| Efficiency ratio (H/(D+F-G)) | 57.21 | % | 57.46 | % | 58.88 | % | 57.10 | % | 55.21 | % | |||||||||
| Efficiency ratio (non-GAAP) (H/(E+F-G)) | 56.95 | 57.18 | 58.58 | 56.83 | 54.95 | ||||||||||||||
| Three Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||
| Mar 31, | Dec 31, | Sep 30, | Jun 30, | Mar 31, | |||||||||||||||
| (Dollars and shares in thousands) | 2025 | 2024 | 2024 | 2024 | 2024 | ||||||||||||||
| Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Tangible Common Equity Ratio: | |||||||||||||||||||
| Total shareholders’ equity (GAAP) | $ | 6,600,537 | $ | 6,344,297 | $ | 6,399,714 | $ | 5,536,628 | $ | 5,436,400 | |||||||||
| Less: Non-convertible preferred stock (GAAP) | (412,500 | ) | (412,500 | ) | (412,500 | ) | (412,500 | ) | (412,500 | ) | |||||||||
| Less: Intangible assets (GAAP) | (913,004 | ) | (918,632 | ) | (924,646 | ) | (676,562 | ) | (677,911 | ) | |||||||||
| (I) Total tangible common shareholders’ equity (non-GAAP) | $ | 5,275,033 | $ | 5,013,165 | $ | 5,062,568 | $ | 4,447,566 | $ | 4,345,989 | |||||||||
| (J) Total assets (GAAP) | $ | 65,870,066 | $ | 64,879,668 | $ | 63,788,424 | $ | 59,781,516 | $ | 57,576,933 | |||||||||
| Less: Intangible assets (GAAP) | (913,004 | ) | (918,632 | ) | (924,646 | ) | (676,562 | ) | (677,911 | ) | |||||||||
| (K) Total tangible assets (non-GAAP) | $ | 64,957,062 | $ | 63,961,036 | $ | 62,863,778 | $ | 59,104,954 | $ | 56,899,022 | |||||||||
| Common equity to assets ratio (GAAP) (L/J) | 9.4 | % | 9.1 | % | 9.4 | % | 8.6 | % | 8.7 | % | |||||||||
| Tangible common equity ratio (non-GAAP) (I/K) | 8.1 | 7.8 | 8.1 | 7.5 | 7.6 | ||||||||||||||
| Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Tangible Book Value per Common Share: | |||||||||||||||||||
| Total shareholders’ equity | $ | 6,600,537 | $ | 6,344,297 | $ | 6,399,714 | $ | 5,536,628 | $ | 5,436,400 | |||||||||
| Less: Preferred stock | (412,500 | ) | (412,500 | ) | (412,500 | ) | (412,500 | ) | (412,500 | ) | |||||||||
| (L) Total common equity | $ | 6,188,037 | $ | 5,931,797 | $ | 5,987,214 | $ | 5,124,128 | $ | 5,023,900 | |||||||||
| (M) Actual common shares outstanding | 66,919 | 66,495 | 66,482 | 61,760 | 61,737 | ||||||||||||||
| Book value per common share (L/M) | $ | 92.47 | $ | 89.21 | $ | 90.06 | $ | 82.97 | $ | 81.38 | |||||||||
| Tangible book value per common share (non-GAAP) (I/M) | 78.83 | 75.39 | 76.15 | 72.01 | 70.40 | ||||||||||||||
| Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Return on Average Tangible Common Equity: | |||||||||||||||||||
| (N) Net income applicable to common shares | $ | 182,048 | $ | 178,371 | $ | 163,010 | $ | 145,397 | $ | 180,303 | |||||||||
| Add: Intangible asset amortization | 5,618 | 5,773 | 4,042 | 1,122 | 1,158 | ||||||||||||||
| Less: Tax effect of intangible asset amortization | (1,421 | ) | (1,547 | ) | (1,087 | ) | (311 | ) | (291 | ) | |||||||||
| After-tax intangible asset amortization | $ | 4,197 | $ | 4,226 | $ | 2,955 | $ | 811 | $ | 867 | |||||||||
| (O) Tangible net income applicable to common shares (non-GAAP) | $ | 186,245 | $ | 182,597 | $ | 165,965 | $ | 146,208 | $ | 181,170 | |||||||||
| Total average shareholders’ equity | $ | 6,460,941 | $ | 6,418,403 | $ | 5,990,429 | $ | 5,450,173 | $ | 5,440,457 | |||||||||
| Less: Average preferred stock | (412,500 | ) | (412,500 | ) | (412,500 | ) | (412,500 | ) | (412,500 | ) | |||||||||
| (P) Total average common shareholders’ equity | $ | 6,048,441 | $ | 6,005,903 | $ | 5,577,929 | $ | 5,037,673 | $ | 5,027,957 | |||||||||
| Less: Average intangible assets | (916,069 | ) | (921,438 | ) | (833,574 | ) | (677,207 | ) | (678,731 | ) | |||||||||
| (Q) Total average tangible common shareholders’ equity (non-GAAP) | $ | 5,132,372 | $ | 5,084,465 | $ | 4,744,355 | $ | 4,360,466 | $ | 4,349,226 | |||||||||
| Return on average common equity, annualized (N/P) | 12.21 | % | 11.82 | % | 11.63 | % | 11.61 | % | 14.42 | % | |||||||||
| Return on average tangible common equity, annualized (non-GAAP) (O/Q) | 14.72 | 14.29 | 13.92 | 13.49 | 16.75 | ||||||||||||||
| Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Pre-Tax, Pre-Provision Income: | |||||||||||||||||||
| Income before taxes | $ | 253,055 | $ | 253,081 | $ | 232,709 | $ | 211,343 | $ | 249,956 | |||||||||
| Add: Provision for credit losses | 23,963 | 16,979 | 22,334 | 40,061 | 21,673 | ||||||||||||||
| Pre-tax income, excluding provision for credit losses (non-GAAP) | $ | 277,018 | $ | 270,060 | $ | 255,043 | $ | 251,404 | $ | 271,629 | |||||||||
WINTRUST SUBSIDIARIES
Wintrust is a financial holding company whose common stock is traded on the Nasdaq Global Select Market (Nasdaq: WTFC) that operates bank retail locations in the greater Chicago, southern Wisconsin, west Michigan, northwest Indiana, and southwest Florida market areas. Its 16 community bank subsidiaries are: Barrington Bank & Trust Company, N.A., Beverly Bank & Trust Company, N.A., Crystal Lake Bank & Trust Company, N.A., Hinsdale Bank & Trust Company, N.A., Lake Forest Bank & Trust Company, N.A., Libertyville Bank & Trust Company, N.A., Macatawa Bank, N.A., Northbrook Bank & Trust Company, N.A., Old Plank Trail Community Bank, N.A., Schaumburg Bank & Trust Company, N.A., St. Charles Bank & Trust Company, N.A., State Bank of The Lakes, N.A., Town Bank, N.A., Village Bank & Trust, N.A., Wheaton Bank & Trust Company, N.A., and Wintrust Bank, N.A.
Additionally, the Company operates various non-bank businesses:
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This document contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws. Forward-looking information can be identified through the use of words such as “intend,” “plan,” “project,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “contemplate,” “possible,” “will,” “may,” “should,” “would” and “could.” Forward-looking statements and information are not historical facts, are premised on many factors and assumptions, and represent only management’s expectations, estimates and projections regarding future events. Similarly, these statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks and uncertainties that are difficult to predict, and which may include, but are not limited to, those listed below and the Risk Factors discussed under Item 1A of the Company’s 2024 Annual Report on Form 10-K and in any of the Company’s subsequent SEC filings. The Company intends such forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and is including this statement for purposes of invoking these safe harbor provisions. Such forward-looking statements may be deemed to include, among other things, statements relating to the Company’s future financial performance, the performance of its loan portfolio, the expected amount of future credit reserves and charge-offs, delinquency trends, growth plans, regulatory developments, securities that the Company may offer from time to time, and management’s long-term performance goals, as well as statements relating to the anticipated effects on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations from expected developments or events, the Company’s business and growth strategies, including future acquisitions of banks, specialty finance or wealth management businesses, internal growth and plans to form additional de novo banks or branch offices. Actual results could differ materially from those addressed in the forward-looking statements as a result of numerous factors, including the following:
Therefore, there can be no assurances that future actual results will correspond to these forward-looking statements. The reader is cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statement made by the Company. Any such statement speaks only as of the date the statement was made or as of such date that may be referenced within the statement. The Company undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect the impact of circumstances or events after the date of the press release. Persons are advised, however, to consult further disclosures management makes on related subjects in its reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and in its press releases.
CONFERENCE CALL, WEBCAST AND REPLAY
The Company will hold a conference call on Tuesday, April 22, 2025 at 9:00 a.m. (CDT) regarding first quarter 2025 earnings results. Individuals interested in participating in the call by addressing questions to management should register for the call to receive the dial-in numbers and unique PIN at the Conference Call Link included within the Company’s press release dated March 31, 2025 available at the Investor Relations, Investor News and Events, Press Releases link on its website at https://www.wintrust.com. A separate simultaneous audio-only webcast link is included within the press release referenced above. Registration for and a replay of the audio-only webcast with an accompanying slide presentation will be available at https://www.wintrust.com, Investor Relations, Investor News and Events, Presentations & Conference Calls. The text of the first quarter 2025 earnings press release will also be available on the home page of the Company’s website at https://www.wintrust.com and at the Investor Relations, Investor News and Events, Press Releases link on its website.
FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT:
Timothy S. Crane, President & Chief Executive Officer
David A. Dykstra, Vice Chairman & Chief Operating Officer
(847) 939-9000
Web site address: www.wintrust.com
US Senate News:
Source: United States Senator Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn)
NASHVILLE, Tenn. – U.S. Senators Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.) and Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) introduced the Sister City Transparency Act to identify the risks of foreign espionage, including by Communist China, within sister city partnerships that exist to promote cultural exchange and economic development:
“Communist China is exploiting sister city partnerships to achieve its own strategic objectives, and we need to make certain we are not enabling this activity in our own communities,” said Senator Blackburn. “This legislation would shine a bright light on these partnerships to keep our enemies from furthering their own dangerous agendas.”
“This commonsense bill is an important step towards protecting our security and economy by studying our sister city partnerships with cities across the world,” said Senator Tillis. “We must ensure sister city partnerships don’t expose us to harmful market practices, limit free speech, or support foreign interests that undermine our values.”
Click here to download a video of Senator Blackburn discussing her Sister City Transparency Act.
BACKGROUND
The United States maintains 1,800 sister city partnerships with countries worldwide, including 157 partnerships with Chinese communities. However, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has begun using these partnerships to achieve geostrategic objectives.
The CCP hides behind soft diplomacy and mutual benefit until its foreign partners exhibit political nonconformity. Thus, similar to Confucius Institutes, sister city partnerships may leave American communities vulnerable to foreign espionage and ideological coercion.
Little information currently exists regarding sister city partnerships operating within the U.S because such partnerships generally fail to publicize information regarding their agreements, activities, and employees. This impedes proper oversight and could enable malign activity.
SISTER CITY TRANSPARENCY ACT
The Sister City Transparency Act would create a Government Accountability Office report on sister city partnerships in the U.S. It would direct the Comptroller General to study partnerships involving foreigncommunities in countries with significant public sector corruption like Communist China and the Russian Federation. The study would:
Identify the oversight practices that U.S. communities implement to mitigate the risks of foreign espionage and economic coercion within sister city partnerships;
Assess the extent to which foreign communities could use sister city partnerships to conduct malign activities, including academic and industrial espionage; and
Review best practices to ensure transparency regarding sister city partnerships’ agreements, activities, and employees.
Source: US Commodity Futures Trading Commission
WASHINGTON, D.C. — The Commodity Futures Trading Commission’s Divisions of Market Oversight, Clearing and Risk, and Market Participants today issued a Request for Comment to better inform them on the potential uses, benefits, and risks of perpetual contracts in the derivatives markets the CFTC regulates (“Perpetual Derivatives”).
“Innovation and new technology has created a renaissance in markets that presents new opportunities that are accessible to more people, as well as risks,” said Acting Chairman Caroline D. Pham. “The CFTC is getting back to basics by requesting public comment on perpetual contracts that have seen significant interest recently from exchanges and market participants.”
This request seeks comment on the characteristics of perpetual derivatives, including those characteristics which may differ across products. as well as the implications of their use in trading, clearing and risk management. The request also seeks comment on the risks of perpetual derivatives, including risks related to the areas of market integrity, customer protection, or retail trading.
Comments will be accepted until May 21. Comments may be submitted electronically through the CFTC Comments online process.
Source: US Congressional Budget Office
|
By Fiscal Year, Millions of Dollars |
2025 |
2025-2030 |
2025-2035 |
||||||||
|
Direct Spending (Outlays) |
0 |
1,789 |
1,789 |
||||||||
|
Revenues |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||||||||
|
Increase or Decrease (-) in the Deficit |
0 |
1,789 |
1,789 |
||||||||
|
Spending Subject to Appropriation (Outlays) |
* |
2 |
not estimated |
||||||||
|
Increases net direct spending in any of the four consecutive 10-year periods beginning in 2036? |
No |
Statutory pay-as-you-go procedures apply? |
Yes |
||||||||
|
Mandate Effects |
|||||||||||
|
Increases on-budget deficits in any of the four consecutive 10-year periods beginning in 2036? |
No |
Contains intergovernmental mandate? |
No |
||||||||
|
Contains private-sector mandate? |
No |
||||||||||
|
* = between zero and $500,000. |
|||||||||||
|
The bill would
|
|||||||||||
|
Estimated budgetary effects would mainly stem from
|
|||||||||||
|
Areas of significant uncertainty include
|
|||||||||||
Source: US State of Pennsylvania
April 22, 2025 – Harrisburg, PA
Governor Josh Shapiro, First Lady Lori Shapiro, Lieutenant Governor Austin Davis, and Second Lady Blayre Holmes Davis will welcome pre-K students from across the Commonwealth to Pennsylvania’s 2025 Annual Easter Egg Hunt at the Governor’s Residence. This event comes after Governor Shapiro made clear that he and the First Lady would be opening the Residence’s doors as quickly as possible.
The Governor’s 2025-26 budget proposal makes significant investments in child care – including $55 million to give child care workers in Pennsylvania at least $1,000 in recruitment or retention bonuses and an additional $10 million to increase Early Intervention (EI) provider rates, to ensure every Pennsylvania child has the support and resources needed to succeed, regardless of family income. This budget also proposes an additional $15 million for the Pre-K Counts program to help providers raise wages and stabilize the early educator workforce.
WHO:
Governor Josh Shapiro
First Lady Lori Shapiro
Lieutenant Governor Austin Davis
Second Lady Blayre Holmes Davis
The Easter Bunny
Pre-K for PA
Pre-K Students
WHEN:
Tuesday, April 22, 2025 at 10:00AM
*Press must enter through the Maclay Street entrance gate. Please be prepared to show credentials upon arrival.
WHERE:
Pennsylvania Governor’s Residence
2035 North Front Street
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17102
LIVE STREAM:
pacast.com/live/gov
governor.pa.gov/live/
RSVP:
Press who are interested in attending must RSVP with the names and phones numbers for each member of their team to ra-gvgovpress@pa.gov.
Source: US Justice – Antitrust Division
Headline: U.S. Attorneys for Southwestern Border Districts Charge More than 1,220 Illegal Aliens with Immigration-Related Crimes During the Third week in April as part of Operation Take Back America.
Since the inauguration of President Trump, the Department of Justice is playing a critical role in Operation Take back America, a nationwide initiative to repel the invasion of illegal immigration, achieve total elimination of cartels and transnational criminal organizations (TCOs), and protect our communities from perpetrators of violent crime. Operation Take Back America streamlines efforts and resources from the Department’s Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Forces (OCDETFs) and Project Safe Neighborhood (PSN).
Source: US State of Georgia
ATLANTA (April 21, 2025)—Today, Governor Brian P. Kemp officially signed Senate Bills 68 and 69 into law, marking a major step forward in Georgia’s ongoing effort to balance our civil justice system and protect Georgians from abusive litigation practices. President Pro Tempore John F. Kennedy (R–Macon) carried the bills in the Senate on behalf of Governor Kemp, who named tort reform his top legislative priority for the 2025 session.
SB 68 enacts sweeping reforms to Georgia’s tort laws, including changes to negligent security liability, apportionment of fault, and damages in civil cases. Designed to protect small businesses and consumers from the burden of frivolous lawsuits, SB 68 aims to create a fairer and more balanced civil justice environment that will benefit consumers and job creators alike.
“Our goal as legislators is to preserve the well-being of Georgians everywhere, including small businesses, health care providers and working families,” said Sen. Kennedy. “SB 68 cracks down on excessive and frivolous litigation to ensure that our legal system works for those who play by the rules, not those looking to exploit it. Curbing lawsuit abuse is strong step in the right direction. These reforms will bring stability to small businesses and job creators across our state.”
SB 69, the Georgia Courts Access and Consumer Protection Act, complements SB 68 by addressing the growing influence of Third-Party Litigation Financing (TPLF). The new law requires TPLF entities to register with the state, bans foreign-affiliated financiers from operating in Georgia, and opens registration records to the public for greater transparency and accountability.
“Alongside SB 68, SB 69 specifically cracks down on predatory litigation financers who seek to take advantage of unwary Georgia consumers,” said Sen. Kennedy. “This billion-dollar industry, often backed by foreign actors, has no place in our civil justice system. With this legislation, we are upholding the integrity of Georgia’s courts and strengthening consumer protections statewide. I am thankful for the support of Governor Kemp and my Senate colleagues as we worked this session to get these measures across the finish line.”
Together, Senate Bills 68 and 69 reinforce Georgia’s status as the No. 1 state for business by establishing a more predictable, transparent and fair legal environment. Both bills received strong support from stakeholders across Georgia’s business and legal communities and represent a critical victory in the ongoing effort to make the state’s economy more resilient and competitive.
For more information about Senate Bill 68, click here. For more information about Senate Bill 69, click here.
# # # #
Sen. John F. Kennedy serves as the President Pro Tempore of the Georgia State Senate. He represents the 18th Senate District, which includes Crawford, Monroe, Peach and Upson counties, as well as portions of Bibb and Houston counties. He may be reached at (404) 656-6578 or by email at John.Kennedy@senate.ga.gov.
For all media inquiries, please reach out to SenatePressInquiries@senate.ga.gov.
Source: US State of New York
overnor Kathy Hochul today directed flags to be lowered at half staff to honor the life and legacy of His Holiness Pope Francis, who passed away today at the age of 88.
“I join everyone around the world in mourning the loss of His Holiness Pope Francis, as his leadership transcended religious boundaries,” Governor Hochul said. “He embodied the values Christ taught us every day: helping the less fortunate, calling for peace, and ensuring every person is treated as a child of God. Pope Francis led with compassion, humility and inclusivity, emphasizing that God does not disown any of his children, and reminded us of our collective responsibility to protect this beautiful planet, our shared home. We should all strive to carry on his legacy.”
Last year, Governor Hochul visited the Vatican to deliver remarks at a Pontifical Summit to discuss climate change where Pope Francis delivered an address calling on the world to take care of the most vulnerable in our society.
Flags will be lowered from Monday, April 21 through the day of his funeral service.
Source: US State of New York
overnor Kathy Hochul is promoting work zone safety by urging all drivers to slow down, stay alert and follow New York State’s Move Over Law to protect roadside workers and other motorists. As construction season kicks into high gear statewide, these efforts highlight National Work Zone Awareness Week — which is celebrated from April 21-25, 2025 — and the national theme: “Respect the zone so we all get home.”
“Every roadside worker deserves to return home safely at the end of their shift,” Governor Hochul said. “We’re asking all drivers to do their part by reducing speed, eliminating distractions and staying vigilant in work zones so that our hard-working and dedicated roadside workers are safe. A few extra seconds of your time and attention can save a life.”
In 2024, there were more than 156 crashes in Thruway work zones resulting in one fatality and 30 injuries. Distracted driving, following too closely, an unsafe lane change or disregarding traffic warning signs caused the majority of the crashes. In addition, two Thruway Authority employees died and another was seriously injured in separate incidents while working on the New York State Thruway. In its 70-plus year history, 22 Thruway employees have been killed while on the job.
In 2024, there were 322 intrusions in New York State Department of Transportation (NYSDOT) work zones. These intrusions resulted in the deaths of two drivers who entered the work zones and 138 additional injuries to highway workers and the traveling public. A total of 58 members of the NYSDOT family have died on the job across New York State, dating as far back as 1939.
Throughout National Work Zone Awareness Week, the New York State Thruway Authority and NYSDOT will be hosting awareness events, lighting digital highway signs with safety messages and sharing important safety reminders on social media platforms. In addition — at the direction of Governor Hochul — State landmarks will be illuminated in orange on Wednesday, April 23 in recognition of Go Orange Day. Drivers are encouraged to:
This April also marks two years since the launch of the Automated Work Zone Speed Enforcement (AWZSE) pilot program. The pilot program was established by legislation enacted into law by Governor Hochul in 2021 which authorized a five-year pilot program run as a joint effort by NYSDOT and the Thruway Authority to enhance the State’s ongoing efforts to slow motorists down in work zones and make New York’s highways safer.
More than 425,000 Notices of Liability have been issued statewide, with over 38,000 repeat offenders since the AWZSE program began issuing Notices of Liability in May 2023. In locations where the cameras have been present more than once, fewer Notices of Liability are being issued, meaning that people are slowing down when cameras are present.
Fines through the pilot program are issued as follows:
To further protect the workers who build and maintain roads and bridges, Governor Hochul proposed making the AWZSE pilot program permanent and increasing penalties for repeat violators in her Fiscal Year 2026 Executive Budget, in addition to expanding the program to include Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) Bridges and Tunnels and New York State Bridge Authority properties. Additionally, the Governor suggested enhancing penalties for assaults against transportation workers, extending protections similar to those provided to many MTA and retail workers. These actions will improve safety for both workers and drivers.
Beginning with National Work Zone Awareness Week and continuing through the construction season, the New York State Police and local law enforcement agencies will once again be conducting “Operation Hardhat” details to enforce vehicle and traffic laws in highway work zones. Under “Operation Hardhat,” State Troopers or local police officers are dressed as highway maintenance workers in active NYSDOT or Thruway work zones across New York, identifying and citing motorists for several violations, including disobeying flagging personnel, speeding through work zones, cell phone and seatbelt use, and/or violations of the State’s Move Over law. Last year 2,755 tickets were issued by State Police and participating law enforcement agencies during 62 deployments across the State.
The New York State Department of Transportation and Thruway Authority have produced new videos encouraging motorists to move over in work zones. See the NYSDOT video here and Thruway Authority video here.
To celebrate “Go Orange Day” and to commemorate National Work Zone Awareness Week, the following New York State landmarks will be lit orange on Wednesday, April 23:
The New York State Bridge Authority (NYSBA) is observing Work Zone Awareness Week by conducting a “road show” at each of its five vehicular spans. Each day will consist of a meeting with staff, followed by a meeting with local stakeholders and first responders to discuss safety concerns, explore opportunities for collaboration, and share information about NYSBA’s upcoming construction season. Additionally, the necklace lights on the Mid-Hudson Bridge will be illuminated in orange in honor of “Go Orange Day” to promote work zone safety.
New York State Thruway Authority Executive Director Frank G. Hoare said, “Each day, roadside workers risk their lives to enhance the safety of the roads we all rely on. It’s everyone’s responsibility to ensure they can perform their jobs safely and return to their families after their shifts. Drivers need to remain alert and reduce their speed in work zones. Let’s show our appreciation for the dedicated men and women who keep our roads operating safely.”
New York State Department of Transportation Commissioner Marie Therese Dominguez said, “Our dedicated highway maintenance and construction workers routinely work in hazardous conditions so that the rest of us can get where we need to go, safely. They have families, friends and loved ones who love them and depend on them. We owe them all a debt of gratitude and paying back that debt begins with keeping them safe. I appreciate Governor Hochul’s continuing efforts to protect our workers so remember, every driver has a role to play — during National Work Zone Awareness Week and throughout the year – that is why I urge all motorists to put down your phones, slow down, and pay attention, especially in work zones. Lives are at stake.”
New York State Bridge Authority Executive Director Dr. Minosca Alcantara said, “This week serves as an important reminder that work zone safety is a shared responsibility for everyone who travels on our state’s roadways. In recognition of this, the Bridge Authority is bringing together staff and local leaders at each of our five vehicular bridges to reinforce our partnerships and collective commitment to protecting employees working in construction zones. By remaining vigilant and looking out for our work crews, we help ensure that our staff return home safely to their loved ones—and that all travelers experience a safer journey.”
New York State Police Superintendent Steven G. James said, “Highway workers, law enforcement officers and other emergency responders, work in a dangerous environment and risk their lives to keep the traveling public safe. They should be able to do their jobs without fear of harm and go home to their families at the end of each workday. It is important that motorists are aware of their responsibility to slow down, move over and put electronic devices away.”
New York State Department of Motor Vehicles Commissioner and Chair of the Governor’s Traffic Safety Committee Mark J.F. Schroeder said, “As someone who spends a lot of time on the road driving across New York, I cannot understate my appreciation for the men and women who work to maintain the safety of those roads. We must all mind the rules of the road, and especially the rules of the work zone, to ensure that everyone on both sides of the cones and barricades are safe at all times.”
State Senator Jeremy Cooney said, “This National Work Zone Awareness Week is a reminder for drivers to slow down, drive safely, and obey the rules of the road. Our highway employees work hard every day to improve our roads and get drivers where they need to go, and it’s only right that we work to keep them safe while on the job. I’m grateful to Governor Hochul, the Thruway Authority and NYSDOT for their continued partnership to keep all New Yorkers safe on the road.”
Assemblymember William B. Magnarelli said, “Work Zone safety continues to be a priority for me as Chair of the Transportation Committee. In 2021, I was proud to sponsor and get passed into law legislation creating a pilot program for the use of speed cameras in work zones. There is no excuse for speeding and reckless driving in work zones. Our workers deserve a safe working environment and to safely go home to their families at the end of their shifts.”
Associated General Contractors of New York State President and CEO Mike Elmendorf said, “Work zone safety isn’t just a one-week concern—it’s a year-round priority. As construction season ramps up, we urge all drivers: stay alert, slow down, and move over in work zones. Every day, highway workers and flaggers face serious risks from speeding and distracted drivers. That’s why New York’s work zone speed camera program is critical — it saves lives and must be made permanent and expanded. The recent rise in assaults on transportation workers makes it even more urgent to strengthen legal protections for those building and maintaining our infrastructure. AGC NYS is proud to partner with Governor Hochul and NYSDOT to create safer roads for workers and drivers alike. We applaud the Governor’s Executive Budget proposals to make the speed camera program permanent and close legal loopholes that leave workers vulnerable. Now, the Legislature must act to protect the men and women who keep New York moving.”
New York State American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations President Mario Cliento said, “In just a few days, we will mark Workers Memorial Day to honor those who lost their lives on the job. As leaders move closer to finalizing the state budget, we have a unique opportunity to improve worker safety with new work zone protections and traffic laws. No worker should fear for their life while performing their job, and no family should have to grieve the loss of a loved one due to preventable and entirely avoidable roadway incidents. We thank Governor Hochul for prioritizing worker safety, and we look forward to working with her on protecting the workforce that keeps our roads safe.”
New York State Building and Construction Trades Council President Gary LaBarbera said, “Construction sites are inherently dangerous and the added hazards and less-controllable variants of roadways and high speed traffic only increase the risks for worksites on our highways. This is why we must continue to encourage drivers to proceed with more caution and mindfulness around roadway work zones. We applaud Governor Hochul for her ongoing leadership and action on this important issue. Every hard-working New Yorker, including our brave tradesmen and tradeswomen working on our roadways, deserve to return home safely to their families at the end of each shift.”
Laborers’ International Union of North America Vice President and New England Regional Manager Donato A. Bianco, Jr. said, “National Work Zone Awareness Week serves as an important reminder to everyone traveling our highways to slow down, stay alert and respect the men and women who perform this necessary and inherently dangerous work. Every day, LIUNA members build, repair and maintain the roads we drive to our jobs and back home to our families. It is because of these workers that our commutes are safer and more efficient. We all owe it to them to prioritize their safety and ensure they also return home to their loved ones at the end of their workday.”
New York State Laborers Health and Safety Trust Fund Executive Director Frank Marchese, Jr. said, “National Work Zone Awareness Week is an important initiative that calls attention to the perils of road construction, and why driver attentiveness is imperative all year round. The data shows that prioritizing work zone safety legislation and initiatives creates a far less hazardous environment for workers simply doing their jobs by reducing speeding and distracted driving. Our union calls on everyone to do their part to keep workers safe, and show support for those who keep New York State moving forward.”
New York State Conference of Operating Engineers President Thomas A. Callahan said, “Our members work hard building and repairing New York’s roads and bridges. That dangerous work becomes deadly with reckless and careless drivers. That’s why we urge the Legislature and the Governor to pass a budget that includes speed cameras in work zones legislation in addition to other safety measures.”
Civil Service Employees Association Thruway Local 058 President Sean Kennedy said, “CSEA affirms our commitment to making sure all of our members make it home at the end of the work day. Drivers need to do their part too.”
Civil Service Employees Association President Mary E. Sullivan said, “Our union joins Governor Hochul, the New York State Department of Transportation and the New York State Thruway Authority in observing National Work Zone Awareness Week from April 21 to April 25. As road work season begins, we want to once again highlight the importance of safe driving in highway work zones. This year, we observe this week remembering our union brother Stephen Ebling, who lost his life while working in a Thruway work zone. As motorists, we must always use caution while in work zones; respect the zone so we can all get home.”
New York State Public Employees Federation President Wayne Spence said, “The 54,000 members of the New York State Public Employees Federation, especially the hardworking professionals at the NYS Department of Transportation, urge all New Yorkers to stay aware, on task and use caution when driving through highway work zones. As we enter National Work Zone Awareness Week, April 21-25, 2025, all New Yorkers should all be mindful that our highway workers have families that need them. In 2024 alone, there were more than 156 crashes in Thruway work zones resulting in one fatality and 30 injuries. Unfortunately, the vast majority of these accidents were entirely preventable if the drivers had focused on operating their vehicles and maintained appropriate work zone speeds — distracted driving and operator error were responsible for the vast majority of these crashes. PEF urges all motorists to pay attention and respect our highway work zones so all these dedicated workers can get home safely to their families.”
Teamsters Local 456 President and Principal Officer Louis A. Picani said, “National Work Zone Awareness Week is a crucial time to reflect on the safety of our workers and the public. One of Teamsters Local 456’s objectives is to maintain the safety and well-being of our members. We support our partners in state government in enforcing stringent safety measures to protect those who build and maintain our roads. Local 456 not only represents the New York State Thruway workers, whose lives are in danger every day, but also the construction workers who are out fixing and maintaining roadways for those who travel them every day. We extend our heartfelt thanks to Governor Hochul for her unwavering support and commitment to enhancing work zone safety. Together, we can ensure that every work zone is a safe zone.”
Safety is a shared responsibility. By working together, we can reduce accidents and ensure safer roads for workers and drivers alike.
For more information on National Work Zone Awareness Week and how to stay safe while driving through work zones, visit the state’s comprehensive website at ny.gov/workzone.
Source: Office of United States Attorneys
Orlando, Florida – United States Attorney Gregory W. Kehoe announces that Augusto Rene Reyes-Gonzalez (37, Guatemala), Carlos Grijalva-Garcia (38, Guatemala), and Brandon Charod Smith (39, Palm Bay) have pleaded guilty to their respective roles in conspiring to distribute and distributing cocaine and methamphetamine. Reyes-Gonzalez and Grijalva-Garcia also pleaded guilty to illegal reentry by a deported alien. Reyes-Gonzalez and Smith each face a mandatory minimum penalty of 10 years, up to life, in federal prison. Grijalva-Garcia faces a maximum penalty of 20 years in federal prison. No sentencing dates have been set.
According to court documents, in August and September 2023, Reyes-Gonzalez conspired with Grijalva-Garcia to distribute cocaine, which they distributed to a confidential source on August 25, 2023. Between September 2023 and January 2024, Reyes-Gonzalez conspired with Smith to distribute 50 grams or more of methamphetamine, which they distributed to the same confidential source on September 8, October 6, December 1, and December 22, 2023. In total, the conspiracies involved over 80 grams of cocaine and over 3 kilograms of pure methamphetamine.
At the time of the drug conspiracies, Reyes-Gonzalez and Grijalva-Garcia were citizens of Guatemala and found to be unlawfully in the United States. Both individuals had previously been removed from the United States on multiple occasions.
This case was investigated by the Drug Enforcement Administration, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Palm Bay Police Department, the Rockledge Police Department, the Melbourne Police Department, the Cocoa Police Department, and the Brevard County Sheriff’s Office. It is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorneys Brandon Cruz, Dana Hill, and Megan Testerman.
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Naomi Oreskes, Professor of the History of Science, Harvard University
President Donald Trump has issued an executive order that would block state laws seeking to tackle greenhouse gas emissions – the latest salvo in his administration’s campaign to roll back United States’ climate action.
Under Trump, the US has clearly abdicated climate leadership. But the US has in fact obstructed climate action for decades – largely due to damaging actions by the powerful fossil fuel industry.
In 20 years studying attacks on climate science and the powerful forces at work behind the scenes, I’ve come to think the United States is simply not going to lead on climate action. The fossil fuel industry has so poisoned the well of public debate in the US that it’s unlikely the nation will lead on the issue in our lifetimes.
Australia, on the other hand, has enormous potential.
I recently visited Australia from Harvard University for a series of public talks. This nation is very close to my heart. I trained as a mining geologist and spent three years in outback South Australia, before returning to academia.
The vacuum Trump has created on climate policy provides a chance for other countries to lead. Australia has much more to gain from the clean-energy future than it stands to lose – and your climate action could be pivotal.
Scientists first warned against burning fossil fuels way back in the 1950s. When the US Clean Air Act was passed in 1970, the words “weather” and “climate” were included because scientists had already explained to Congress that carbon dioxide was a pollutant with serious — even dire — effects.
In the late 1980s, scientists at NASA observed changes in the climate system that could only be explained by the extra heating effect of atmospheric carbon dioxide. The predictions had become reality.
When George H.W. Bush ran successfully for president in 1988, he promised to use the power of the “White House effect” to fight the “greenhouse effect”. In 1992, Bush and other world leaders gathered in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, to sign the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Together, 178 countries promised action to prevent “dangerous anthropogenic interference” with Earth’s climate. But that action never came.
Trump has undoubtedly been bad news for global climate action. He makes preposterous claims about science and is dismantling the federal agencies responsible for supporting climate science and maintaining climate data.
But the US has long failed to play its part in cutting dangerous greenhouse gas emissions. The reason for this lies largely outside the White House.
The fossil fuel industry has known about climate change for as long as scientists have.
In the late 1970s and early 1980s, scientists at Esso (later ExxonMobil) actively researched the topic, building climate models and coauthoring scientific papers.
The scientists informed their managers of the risk of catastrophic damage if the burning of oil, gas and coal continued unabated. They even suggested the company might need a different business model – one not so dependent on fossil fuels.
But managers at ExxonMobil made a fateful decision: to turn from information to disinformation. Working in tandem with other oil, gas and coal companies, as well as automobile and aluminium manufacturers, ExxonMobil launched an organised campaign, sustained over decades, to block climate action by casting doubt on the underlying science.
They ran ad campaigns in national and local newspapers insisting the science was too unsettled to warrant action. They created “astroturf” organisations that only pretended to be green, and funded “third-party allies” to argue that proposed remedies would be too expensive, cost jobs and damage the economy.
The company funded outlier scientists to publish papers claiming atmospheric warming was the result of natural climate variability. They pressured journalists to give equal time to “their side” of the story in the name of “balance”.
Over the next three decades, whenever any meaningful climate policy seemed to be gaining traction, the industry and its allies lobbied Congress and state legislatures to block it. So, neither Democratic nor Republican administrations were able to undertake meaningful climate action.
While people were dying in climate-charged floods and fires, the fossil fuel industry persuaded a significant proportion of the US population, including Trump, that the whole thing might just be a hoax.
In a matter of weeks after becoming president, Trump pulled out of the Paris Agreement to limit global warming, shut down government websites hosting climate data, and withdrew support for research that dares to mention the word “climate”.
This has created a vacuum that other countries, including Australia, can step up to fill.
Few countries have more to lose from climate change than Australia. The continent has already witnessed costly and devastating wildfires and floods — affecting remote areas and major cities. It’s not unreasonable to worry that in coming years, significant parts of Australia could become uninhabitable.
Like the US, Australia has a powerful fossil fuel industry that has disproportionately influenced its politics. Unlike the US, however, that industry is based mainly on coal for export, which Australians do not depend on in their daily lives.
And Australia is truly a lucky country. It has unsurpassed potential to replace fossil fuels with renewable energy.
More than 15 years ago, Australian researchers in the Zero Carbon Australia project offered a blueprint for how the country could eliminate fossil fuel use entirely. Since then, renewable energy has only become cheaper and more efficient.
South Australia has proved the point: the state was 100% reliant on fossil fuels for electricity in 2002, but now more than 70% comes from renewables.
Across Australia, the share of renewable electricity generation is growing. Victoria, New South Wales and Queensland are vying for second place after SA. It’s fascinating to watch the National Electricity Market balance supply and demand in real time, where a large proportion of the electricity comes from rooftop solar.
For decades, the fossil fuel industry has told the public our societies can’t manage without fossil fuels. Large parts of Australia have proved it’s just not so. The rest of the nation can follow that lead, and model the energy transition for the world. Here’s your chance.
Over the past two decades, Naomi Oreskes has received grant funding from various governments and non-government organisations to support the research upon which this piece is based. She serves on the board of The Climate Science Legal Defense Fund, which works to protect the integrity of climate science, and climate scientists, from politically motivated attacks. The Fund is a registered 501 c(3) non-profit organisation, meaning it does not engage in political activities. She is also an emerita board member of Protect our Winters, a 501 c (3) that works with the winter sports community to educate people about climate change and the threat it poses to winter sports. Naomi serves on the board of the Kann-Rasmussen foundation (Denmark), a non-profit foundation that works “to support the transition to a more environmentally resilient stable, and sustainable planet”.
Naomi currently serves as a consultant to a number of groups pursuing climate litigation in the United States, and recently submitted an expert report to the International Court of Justice on behalf of Vanuatu. She also receives speaking fees and book royalties for talks and publications on the history of climate science and climate change denial. Co-author, with Erik M. Conway, of Merchants of Doubt (2010) and The Big Myth (2023).
– ref. Fossil fuel companies ‘poisoned the well’ of public debate with climate disinformation. Here’s how Australia can break free – https://theconversation.com/fossil-fuel-companies-poisoned-the-well-of-public-debate-with-climate-disinformation-heres-how-australia-can-break-free-251221
US Senate News:
Source: United States Senator for Washington State Patty Murray
Senator Murray in letter to Secretary Collins: “Over the thirty years I have represented Washington state, VA has approved and hosted countless outreach events with me… I was surprised and dismayed to find out this month that my office had been suddenly denied permission to hold a roundtable for women veterans to be able to talk about their own health care experiences, and concerns related to continued access to services.”
Washington, D.C. — Today, U.S. Senator Patty Murray (D-WA), Vice Chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee and a senior member and former Chair of the Senate Veterans’ Affairs Committee, sent a letter to U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Secretary Doug Collins expressing concern and dismay over the unprecedented refusal—with no justification—by VA to allow VA Puget Sound to participate in a roundtable discussion Senator Murray is holding in Seattle tomorrow on women veterans’ health care. In the hearing on his nomination to lead VA and in his meeting with Senator Murray ahead of the Senate vote on his nomination, Doug Collins promised to be transparent with Congress if confirmed.
“Throughout my time in Congress, under both Republican and Democratic administrations, I have been able to have open and honest conversations with VA and engage with my veteran constituents in Washington state,” Senator Murray wrote in her letter to Secretary Collins. “However, this administration has proven to be vastly different—VA is now providing little to no information in response to congressional inquiries and VA providers are being prevented from getting the opportunity to hear directly from veterans about their health care experience.”
Murray continued, “VA has approved and hosted countless outreach events with me, including roundtables, on VA property to talk about everything from the implementation of the PACT Act to VA’s advancements in prosthetics care. All these events have been compliant with the Hatch Act. So, I was surprised and dismayed to find out this month that my office had been suddenly denied permission to hold a roundtable for women veterans to be able to talk about their own health care experiences, and concerns related to continued access to services. Furthermore, the VA provided no rationale to justify this denial.”
“This roundtable was designed to give providers, women veterans, and VA staff a chance to come together, in a space they all know and trust, to talk about the current state of women’s health care and ensure an ongoing conversation on the importance of prioritizing gender-specific health care services at VA… We owe women veterans the opportunity to have a say in how VA can best deliver their health care to them—and VA Puget Sound has a robust women’s health program that is worth showcasing,” Murray wrote. “From the abrupt mass firing of tens of thousands of VA employees, to the refusal to meaningfully engage with Congress, I am left to conclude that this administration is committed to putting up barriers that only make it harder for women veterans—and all veterans—to receive the care they deserve.”
Senator Murray concluded by requesting answers to the following questions by May 16th, noting her concern with VA’s lack of transparency on the decision to deny her request to host a women veterans’ roundtable at VA Puget Sound, and growing concern with VA politicizing constituent services and congressional oversight:
In February 2024, Senator Murray hosted a roundtable discussion on improving health care for women veterans where she heard directly from VA officials as well as women veterans and Veteran Service Organizations. Senator Murray has hosted countless other events in conjunction with VA Puget Sound over the years.
A PDF of the letter is available HERE.
Source: United States House of Representatives – Representative Don Beyer (D-VA)
U.S. Representative Don Beyer (D-VA), who represents a Northern Virginia district in the U.S. House that includes the Pentagon, again called for the resignation or termination of Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth today after New York Times reporting revealed that Hegseth sent sensitive, and potentially classified, information about military strikes in Yemen in a separate Signal group chat that included his wife, brother and personal lawyer:
“As we have seen in the weeks since reporting by The Atlantic’s Jeffrey Goldberg first revealed the Secretary’s reckless violation of national security procedures, this was not an isolated incident nor was it a mistake. He has shown a pattern of flagrant disregard for the rules and responsibilities entrusted to his office and made clear that he is unfit and unqualified to serve as our Secretary of Defense. Such repeated lapses in judgement not only disprove Hegseth’s claims of ‘100% operations security,’ but also actively put our servicemembers at home and abroad in harm’s way.
“The Secretary has not shown the discretion nor the sound judgement needed to manage his own communications or his front office. As he has previously stated himself: Any security professional ‘would be fired on the spot for this type of conduct and criminally prosecuted for being so reckless with this kind of information.’ The Secretary of Defense is not above the law. He is not exempt from the standards every servicemember serving in the Department of Defense is held to.
“At minimum, Hegseth must resign immediately. If he refuses, President Trump must remove him without delay. Every day he remains in office is a threat to American national security.”
US Senate News:
Source: United States Senator Peter Welch (D-Vermont)
BURLINGTON, VT – U.S. Senator Peter Welch (D-Vt.) today discussed his new bipartisan, bicameral legislation to expand coverage of telehealth services through Medicaid, the Creating Opportunities Now for Necessary and Effective Care Technologies (CONNECT) for Health Act, while visiting the Thayer House in Burlington. Senator Welch was joined at the Thayer House by a clinician from Cathedral Square’s Support and Services at Home (SASH) program, Vermont patients, and health care providers.
“The COVID-19 pandemic proved that telehealth not only works, but is essential,” Senator Welch said about the CONNECT for Health Act. “Rural and underserved areas in Vermont, and across the country, need modern solutions to help get folks connected to care, and increasing telehealth services must be part of the answer. This bipartisan bill takes commonsense steps to bridge that gap and make sure that our policies adapt to the capabilities of our technology.”
The Thayer House is an affordable living community for Vermonters aged 55 and older, and is a SASH program location. SASH is based in more than 140 living communities throughout the state and supports the health of Vermonters who rely on Medicare.
The CONNECT for Health Act would make COVID-19 telehealth flexibilities permanent, improve health outcomes, and make it easier for patients to connect with their doctors. Current Medicare telehealth flexibilities will expire on September 30th, 2025, without Congressional action. Telehealth provides essential access to care, with nearly a quarter of Americans accessing telehealth monthly. Telemedicine is also on the rise in Vermont, with 92% of healthcare providers in the state reporting use of audio/video services to provide care to patients in the past 60 days.
See photos from the event below:
“In a rural, northern state such as Vermont, our patients face many barriers that limit their ability to physically reach our offices– lack of transportation, bad weather, back roads, days that get dark early during our long winters. These factors hit our older patients particularly hard. One tool that is helping patients get the care they need is to be able to see us from home using telehealth. The Vermont Medical Society and Vermont Academy of Family Physicians thank Senator Welch for introducing this important legislation and call on Congress to join him in ensuring patients with Medicare can continue to make use of telehealth visits,” said Anne Morris, MD, family physician, Milton, VT; Board member, Vermont Medical Society and past-president of the Vermont Academy of Family Physicians.
“Telehealth visits increase our resident’s access to care, are more convenient, and save travel time. Telehealth visits also allow our nurses to participate with residents. This can improve the resident’s understanding of their care and ensures that our staff have an in depth understanding of the care plan,” said Jessiyln Dolan, RN, a SASH Wellness Nurse.
“Telehealth is so much easier and I never have to cancel. I can’t do computers very well, so having help from SASH makes it possible to talk to my doctor. I don’t have a car, and it is hard to get a ride to the doctor’s office,” said Helen Mischik, a resident of Thayer House.
The CONNECT for Health Act is cosponsored by a broad bipartisan coalition of more than 60 Senators and is led by Senator Welch and Sens. Brian Schatz (D-Hawai‘i), Roger Wicker (R-Miss.), Mark Warner (D-Va.), Cindy Hyde-Smith (R-Miss.), and John Barrasso (R-Wyo.). Companion legislation has been introduced in the House of Representatives. The CONNECT for Health Act has the support of more than 150 organizations, including the American Medical Association, AARP, American Hospital Association, National Association of Community Health Centers, National Association of Rural Health Clinics, and American Telemedicine Association.
Source: United States Attorneys General 1
Since the inauguration of President Trump, the Department of Justice is playing a critical role in Operation Take back America, a nationwide initiative to repel the invasion of illegal immigration, achieve total elimination of cartels and transnational criminal organizations (TCOs), and protect our communities from perpetrators of violent crime. Operation Take Back America streamlines efforts and resources from the Department’s Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Forces (OCDETFs) and Project Safe Neighborhood (PSN).
Last week, the U.S. Attorneys for Arizona, Central California, Southern California, New Mexico, Southern Texas, and Western Texas charged more than 1,220 defendants with criminal violations of U.S. immigration laws.
The Southern District of Texas filed 216 cases in immigration and security-related matters. As part of those cases, 86 face allegations of illegally reentering the country with the majority having felony convictions such as narcotics, firearms or sexual offenses, or prior immigration crimes. A total of 119 people face charges of illegally entering the country while 11 cases involve various instances of human smuggling. Some of those charged with felony reentry include Mexican national Alejandro Contreras-Zapata, who was allegedly found near Roma. The charges allege he had been previously sentenced to 20 years in prison for aggravated assault with a deadly weapon before his removal March 7.
The Western District of Texas filed 378 new immigration-related criminal cases. Among the new cases, Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s Enforcement Removal Operations (ICE ERO) agents in San Antonio received notification that Mexican national Netsai Moreno-Suarez was arrested for a traffic violation on April 11. Moreno-Suarez was transferred into ICE ERO custody, charged with illegal re-entry. She was previously removed from the United States in August 2023 after being convicted for conspiracy to transport illegal aliens and being sentenced to five years of probation. If convicted, Moreno-Suarez faces up to 20 years in federal prison.
The District of Arizona brought immigration-related criminal charges against 328 defendants. Specifically, the United States filed 130 cases in which aliens illegally re-entered the United States, and the United States also charged 179 aliens for illegally entering the United States. In its ongoing effort to deter unlawful immigration, the United States filed 16 cases against 18 individuals responsible for smuggling illegal aliens into and within the District of Arizona. The United States also charged one individual with failing to register, as required by law.
The Southern District of California filed 135 border-related cases this week, including charges of transportation of illegal aliens, bringing in aliens for financial gain, reentering the U.S. after deportation, deported alien found in the United States, and importation of controlled substances. A sample of border-related arrests this week: On April 15, Jesus Manuel Zuniga Huerta and Jose Alberto Flores Avalos of Mexico were arrested at the Otay Mesa Port of Entry and charged with importing deadly fentanyl into the U.S. According to a complaint, Customs and Border Protection officers discovered 148 pounds of fentanyl in the rear frame well of a tractor-trailer driven by Zuniga Huerta. On April 15, Brian Jaime Sanchez, a Mexican national, was arrested and charged with Bringing in Aliens for Financial Gain. According to a complaint, Customs and Border Protection officers found an undocumented immigrant concealed in the trunk of Sanchez’s car as he attempted to cross the border at the Tecate Port of Entry. On April 17, Sergio Villalba-Serrano, a Mexican national, was arrested and charged with Departed Alien Found in the United States. According to a complaint, Villalba-Serrano was taken into custody near the Tecate Port of Entry after his vehicle was stopped by U.S. Border Patrol agents. Villalba-Serrano had previously been deported on Oct. 26, 2019, from Laredo, Texas.
The Central District of California filed criminal charges against 34 defendants who are alleged to have been found in the United States following removal, the Justice Department announced today. Many of the defendants charged previously were convicted of felony offenses prior to their removal from the United States, including domestic violence, unlawful sex with a minor, and assault with a deadly weapon.
The District of New Mexico brought the following criminal charges in New Mexico: 68 individuals were charged this week with Illegal Reentry After Deportation (8 U.S.C. 1326), 10 individuals were charged this week with Alien Smuggling (8 U.S.C. 1324), and 55 individuals were charged this week with Illegal Entry (8 U.S.C. 1325). Many of the defendants charged pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1326 had prior criminal convictions for possession of a dangerous weapon by a restricted person, aggravated driving under the influence and possession of a forgery writing/device.
We are grateful for the hard work of our border prosecutors in bringing these cases and helping to make our border safe again.
Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)
London, UK, April 21, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — In a time when traders are demanding clarity, performance, and accountability, UCFX Markets has emerged as a beacon of trust, efficiency, and modern trading architecture. With its recent announcement of zero system downtime and full trade transparency, the platform is drawing praise from analysts, high-volume traders, and everyday investors alike.
This dual milestone—infrastructure reliability and complete visibility into trades, pricing, and fees—has elevated UCFX Markets into a category of its own, especially as global platforms continue to suffer from lag, withdrawal delays, and policy confusion. As noted in a series of recent independent UCFXMarkets reviews, the company is delivering not just promises, but measurable performance.
Technology That Doesn’t Sleep
Since the beginning of 2025, UCFX Markets has achieved and maintained 100% operational uptime, a metric that few competitors can match. During major market events—including January’s unexpected altcoin surge and March’s Bitcoin correction—the platform experienced no outages or slowdowns, enabling traders to enter, manage, and exit positions in real time without risk of system-related loss.
“Our clients never have to worry about platform failure during volatile conditions,” said a senior infrastructure engineer at UCFX Markets. “Whether they’re day-trading, swing-trading, or holding long-term, they know the system will be there. No blackout windows. No server crashes.”
This commitment to consistency has sparked a surge in UCFXMarkets reviews, particularly from traders who have grown frustrated with unreliable platforms that freeze or disconnect during peak demand hours.
Full Transparency: From Fees to Execution
Beyond stability, UCFX Markets is also setting the bar for transparency. Clients now have access to:
This level of openness has resonated with both retail and professional traders, many of whom have spent years navigating platforms with hidden charges or unclear execution histories.
“Transparency builds trust. And in 2025, trust is everything,” said a spokesperson for UCFX Markets. “We believe that traders deserve to see exactly how every trade is processed—and exactly what it costs.”
According to one recent financial report, over 78% of new clients cited transparency and system stability as the key reasons for moving to the platform. This has led to an influx of glowing UCFXMarkets reviews from users across Europe, Australia, and Asia.
What Traders Are Saying
Below are four real-world testimonials from verified clients now actively trading with UCFX Markets:
Liam H. – Manchester, UK
“I’ve used at least six trading platforms in the past five years. None come close to the stability and transparency of UCFX Markets. I don’t have to guess what’s happening with my orders. Everything’s logged and clear. I’ve already written multiple UCFXMarkets reviews because they earned it.”
Amelia W. – Sydney, Australia
“During the last flash crash, my previous platform froze completely. I lost over $4,000. That’s when I switched to UCFX Markets. Their uptime is unmatched, and the risk monitoring tools helped me protect every position. Highly recommend.”
Jonas L. – Berlin, Germany
“As someone managing multiple accounts, transparency is non-negotiable. I’ve had platforms lock me out, delay withdrawals, or hide spreads. With UCFX Markets, it’s all laid out. Nothing hidden. My team and I now manage all of our trades here.”
Rachel T. – Toronto, Canada
“It’s the only platform I’ve used where everything works exactly as promised. From deposits to withdrawals to reporting—it’s seamless. I’ve shared UCFXMarkets reviews with friends and colleagues because people deserve better options in crypto trading.”
The Industry Takes Notice
UCFX Markets’ consistent execution and operational integrity have not gone unnoticed. Independent rating firms and fintech publications are beginning to highlight the platform as a rising force in crypto and forex, especially among self-managed traders, portfolio managers, and regulated institutional desks.
The company is also gaining attention for its no-nonsense approach to compliance, offering streamlined KYC processes that meet international standards without unnecessary delays or hurdles. Combined with its real-time trade audit tools, UCFX Markets is positioning itself as a regulation-ready alternative for both individual and enterprise clients.
Looking Ahead: Smarter, Safer, Faster
UCFX Markets’ roadmap for 2025 includes:
These innovations are expected to further boost user satisfaction and enhance already glowing UCFXMarkets reviews seen across fintech communities and trust platforms.
Conclusion
In a market flooded with short-lived platforms and empty promises, UCFX Markets is raising the bar through performance, clarity, and total reliability. With zero downtime and fully transparent operations, it offers a clear path forward for traders who demand both trust and results.
Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)
Executive Snapshot:
GLENVILLE, N.Y., April 21, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) —
TrustCo Bank Corp NY (TrustCo, NASDAQ: TRST) today announced a robust start to 2025, marked by significant growth in both the loan and deposit portfolios of Trustco Bank during the first quarter of 2025 compared to the first quarter of 2024. This performance underscores the Bank’s commitment to serving its community through increased residential and commercial lending and adapting effectively to the evolving financial landscape. This resulted in first quarter 2025 net income of $14.3 million or $0.75 diluted earnings per share, compared to net income of $12.1 million or $0.64 diluted earnings per share for the first quarter 2024. Average loans increased $104.7 million or 2.1% for the first quarter 2025 over the same period in 2024. Average deposits increased $103.3 million or 1.9% for the first quarter 2025 over the same period in 2024.
Overview
Chairman, President, and CEO, Robert J. McCormick said “We are very pleased to announce today that tried and true Trustco Bank strategy has once again yielded exceptional results. We added loans at current market rates, which repriced our current loan portfolio higher, supporting long-term profitability. This was funded entirely by our own deposits, and we did so while holding the line on board rates. Despite aggressive market competition, we have favorably repriced our time deposits with the help of strong brand loyalty and digital engagement. These efforts yielded net income of $14.3 million and boosted all return metrics significantly year-over-year. Credit quality remains exceptional, with non-performing loans holding steady at a negligible 0.37%. The Bank also grew capital and thus maintains its position of strength. Based upon what we have seen in the first quarter, we anticipate that good things are likely in the future.”
Details
Average loans were up $104.7 million, or 2.1%, in the first quarter 2025 over the same period in 2024. Average residential loans and HECLs, our primary lending focus, were up $26.2 million, or 0.6%, and $61.0 million, or 17.3%, respectively, in the first quarter 2025 over the same period in 2024. Average commercial loans also increased $20.7 million, or 7.5%, in the first quarter 2025 over the same period in 2024. This uptick reflects a strong local economy and increased demand for credit. Average deposits were up $103.3 million, or 1.9%, for the first quarter 2025 over the same period in 2024, primarily as a result of an increase in time deposits, interest bearing checking accounts, and demand deposits. We believe the increase in these deposits compared to the same period in 2024 continues to indicate strong customer confidence in the Bank’s competitive deposit offerings. As we move forward, despite a complex economic environment, we believe that our strategic focus on relationship banking and solid financial practices has positioned us for continued success.
During the first quarter of 2025, the TrustCo announced a stock repurchase program of up to one million shares, or approximately 5% of TrustCo’s current outstanding shares of common stock. This repurchase initiative is part of the Bank’s broader capital management strategy and is intended to enhance shareholder value while maintaining flexibility to support future growth. As of March 31, 2025, our equity to asset ratio was 10.85%, compared to 10.51% as of March 31, 2024. Book value per share as of March 31, 2025 was $36.16, up 6.0% compared to $34.12 a year earlier.
Net interest income was $40.4 million for the first quarter 2025, an increase of $3.8 million, or 10.4%, compared to the first quarter of 2024, driven by loan growth at higher interest rates and less interest expense on deposit products, partially offset by lower investment interest income and a decrease in interest on federal funds sold and other short-term investments. The net interest margin for the first quarter 2025 was 2.64%, up 20 basis points from 2.44% in the first quarter of 2024. The yield on interest earnings assets increased to 4.13% in the first quarter of 2025, up 14 basis points from 3.99% in the first quarter of 2024. The cost of interest bearing liabilities decreased to 1.92% in the first quarter 2025, down from 1.99% in the first quarter 2024. As the Federal Reserve signals potential interest rate reductions in 2025, the Bank is proactively preparing to navigate the evolving rate environment. In this context, the Bank anticipates that a lower interest rate environment will provide opportunities to manage deposit costs more effectively, thereby supporting net interest margin. The Bank remains committed to maintaining competitive deposit offerings while ensuring financial stability and continued support for our communities’ banking needs.
Non-interest income increased to $5.0 million as compared to $4.8 million for the first quarter of 2024. This increase was primarily attributable to wealth management and financial services fees, which increased by 16.7% to $2.1 million, driven by strong client demand and higher assets under management. These revenues now represent 42.6% of non-interest income. The majority of this fee income is recurring, supported by long-term advisory relationships and a growing base of managed assets. Non-interest expense increased $1.4 million over the first quarter of 2024 due to increases in several areas of expenses.
Asset quality remains strong and has been consistent over the past twelve months. The Company recorded a provision for credit losses of $300 thousand in the first quarter of 2025, which is the result of a provision for credit losses on loans of $100 thousand, and a provision for credit losses on unfunded commitments of $200 thousand. The ratio of allowance for credit losses on loans to total loans was 0.99% and 0.98% as of March 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. The allowance for credit losses on loans was $50.6 million as of March 31, 2025, compared to $49.2 million as of March 31, 2024. Nonperforming loans (NPLs) were $18.8 million as of March 31, 2025, compared to $18.3 million as of March 31, 2024. NPLs were 0.37% of total loans as of March 31, 2025 and 2024. The coverage ratio, or allowance for credit losses on loans to NPLs, was 269.8% as of March 31, 2025, compared to 269.3% as of March 31, 2024. Nonperforming assets (NPAs) were $20.9 million as of March 31, 2025, compared to $20.6 million as of March 31, 2024.
A conference call to discuss first quarter 2025 results will be held at 9:00 a.m. Eastern Time on April 22, 2025. Those wishing to participate in the call may dial toll-free for the United States at 1-833-470-1428, and for Canada at 1-833-950-0062, Access code 048251. A replay of the call will be available for thirty days by dialing toll-free for the United States at 1-866-813-9403, Access code 486810. The call will also be audio webcast at https://events.q4inc.com/attendee/647533404,and will be available for one year.
About TrustCo Bank Corp NY
TrustCo Bank Corp NY is a $6.3 billion savings and loan holding company and through its subsidiary, Trustco Bank, operated 136 offices in New York, New Jersey, Vermont, Massachusetts, and Florida as of March 31, 2025.
In addition, the Bank’s Wealth Management Department offers a full range of investment services, retirement planning and trust and estate administration services. The common shares of TrustCo are traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol TRST.
Forward-Looking Statements
All statements in this news release that are not historical are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements can be identified by words such as “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” “goal,” “seek,” “believe,” “project,” “estimate,” “expect,” “strategy,” “future,” “likely,” “may,” “should,” “will” and similar references to future development, results or periods. Examples of forward-looking statements include, among others, statements we make regarding our expectations for our future performance, including our expectations regarding the effects of the economic environment on our financial results, our ability to retain customers and the amount of customers’ business, including deposit balances, with us, the impact of the Federal Reserve’s actions regarding interest rates, and the anticipated effects of our capital management strategy, including our stock repurchase program. Forward-looking statements are based on management’s current expectations as well as certain assumptions and estimates made by, and information available to, management at the time the statements are made. Such forward-looking statements are subject to factors and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially for TrustCo from the views, beliefs and projections expressed in such statements, and many of the risks and uncertainties are heightened by or may, in the future, be heightened by volatility in financial markets and macroeconomic or geopolitical concerns related to inflation, changes in United States and foreign trade policy, continued elevated interest rates and ongoing armed conflicts (including the Russia/Ukraine conflict and the conflict in Israel and surrounding areas). TrustCo wishes to caution readers not to place undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made. The following important factors, among others, in some cases have affected and in the future could affect TrustCo’s actual results and could cause TrustCo’s actual financial performance to differ materially from that expressed in any forward-looking statement: future changes in interest rates; external economic factors, such as changes in monetary policy, ongoing inflationary pressures and continued elevated prices; exposure to credit risk in our lending activities; our increasing commercial loan portfolio; the sufficiency of our allowance for credit losses on loans to cover actual loan losses; our ability to meet the cash flow requirements of our depositors or borrowers or meet our operating cash needs to fund corporate expansion and other activities; claims and litigation pertaining to fiduciary responsibility and lender liability; the enforcement of federal cannabis laws and regulations and its impact on our ability to provide services in the cannabis industry; our dependency upon the services of the management team; our disclosure controls and procedures’ ability to prevent or detect errors or acts of fraud; the adequacy of our business continuity and disaster recovery plans; the effectiveness of our risk management framework; the impact of any expansion by us into new lines of business or new products and services; an increase in the prevalence of fraud and other financial crimes; the impact of severe weather events and climate change on us and the communities we serve, including societal responses to climate change; environmental, social and governance risks, as well as diversity, equity, and inclusion-related risks, and their impact on our reputation and relationships; the chance of a prolonged economic downturn, especially one affecting our geographic market area; instability in global economic conditions and geopolitical matters, as well as volatility in financial markets; the soundness of other financial institutions; U.S. government shutdowns, credit rating downgrades, or failure to increase the debt ceiling; fluctuations in the trust wealth management fees we receive as a result of investment performance; the impact of regulatory capital rules on our growth; changes in laws and regulations, including changes in cybersecurity or privacy regulations; restrictions on data collection and use; our compliance with the USA PATRIOT Act, Bank Secrecy Act, and other laws and regulations that could result in material fines or sanctions; changes in tax laws; limitations on our ability to pay dividends; TrustCo Realty Corp.’s ability to qualify as a real estate investment trust; changes in accounting standards; competition within our market areas; consumers and businesses’ use of non-banks to complete financial transactions; our reliance on third-party service providers; the impact of data breaches and cyber-attacks; the development and use of artificial intelligence; the impact of a failure in or breach of our operational or security systems or infrastructure, or those of third parties; the impact of an unauthorized disclosure of sensitive or confidential client or customer information; the impact of interruptions in the effective operation of our computer systems; the impact of anti-takeover provisions in our organizational documents; the impact of the manner in which we allocate capital; and other risks and uncertainties under the heading “Risk Factors” in our most recent annual report on Form 10-K and, if any, in our subsequent quarterly reports on Form 10-Q or other securities filings, as well as our upcoming quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the first quarter of 2025. The forward-looking statements contained in this news release represent TrustCo management’s judgment as of the date of this news release. TrustCo disclaims, however, any intent or obligation to update forward-looking statements, either as a result of future developments, new information or otherwise, except as may be required by law.
| TRUSTCO BANK CORP NY | |||||||||
| GLENVILLE, NY | |||||||||
| FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS | |||||||||
| (dollars in thousands, except per share data) | |||||||||
| (Unaudited) | |||||||||
| Three months ended | |||||||||
| 3/31/2025 | 12/31/2024 | 3/31/2024 | |||||||
| Summary of operations | |||||||||
| Net interest income | $ | 40,373 | $ | 38,902 | $ | 36,578 | |||
| Provision for credit losses | 300 | 400 | 600 | ||||||
| Noninterest income | 4,974 | 4,409 | 4,843 | ||||||
| Noninterest expense | 26,329 | 28,165 | 24,903 | ||||||
| Net income | 14,275 | 11,281 | 12,126 | ||||||
| Per share | |||||||||
| Net income per share: | |||||||||
| – Basic | $ | 0.75 | $ | 0.59 | $ | 0.64 | |||
| – Diluted | 0.75 | 0.59 | 0.64 | ||||||
| Cash dividends | 0.36 | 0.36 | 0.36 | ||||||
| Book value at period end | 36.16 | 35.56 | 34.12 | ||||||
| Market price at period end | 30.48 | 33.31 | 28.16 | ||||||
| At period end | |||||||||
| Full time equivalent employees | 740 | 737 | 761 | ||||||
| Full service banking offices | 136 | 136 | 140 | ||||||
| Performance ratios | |||||||||
| Return on average assets | 0.93 | % | 0.73 | % | 0.80 | % | |||
| Return on average equity | 8.49 | 6.70 | 7.54 | ||||||
| Efficiency ratio (GAAP) | 58.06 | 65.03 | 59.94 | ||||||
| Adjusted Efficiency ratio (1) | 58.00 | 63.93 | 59.94 | ||||||
| Net interest spread | 2.21 | 2.15 | 2.00 | ||||||
| Net interest margin | 2.64 | 2.60 | 2.44 | ||||||
| Dividend payout ratio | 47.97 | 60.70 | 56.48 | ||||||
| Capital ratios at period end | |||||||||
| Consolidated equity to assets | 10.85 | % | 10.84 | % | 10.51 | % | |||
| Consolidated tangible equity to tangible assets (1) | 10.84 | % | 10.83 | % | 10.50 | % | |||
| Asset quality analysis at period end | |||||||||
| Nonperforming loans to total loans | 0.37 | % | 0.37 | % | 0.37 | % | |||
| Nonperforming assets to total assets | 0.33 | 0.34 | 0.33 | ||||||
| Allowance for credit losses on loans to total loans | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.98 | ||||||
| Coverage ratio (2) | 2.7x | 2.7x | 2.7x | ||||||
| (1) Non-GAAP Financial Measure, see Non-GAAP Financial Measures Reconciliation. | |||||||||
| (2) Calculated as allowance for credit losses on loans divided by total nonperforming loans. | |||||||||
| CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME | ||||||||||||||
| (dollars in thousands, except per share data) | ||||||||||||||
| (Unaudited) | ||||||||||||||
| Three months ended | ||||||||||||||
| 3/31/2025 | 12/31/2024 | 9/30/2024 | 6/30/2024 | 3/31/2024 | ||||||||||
| Interest and dividend income: | ||||||||||||||
| Interest and fees on loans | $ | 53,450 | $ | 53,024 | $ | 52,112 | $ | 50,660 | $ | 49,804 | ||||
| Interest and dividends on securities available for sale: | ||||||||||||||
| U. S. government sponsored enterprises | 596 | 680 | 718 | 909 | 906 | |||||||||
| State and political subdivisions | – | – | – | 1 | – | |||||||||
| Mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage | ||||||||||||||
| obligations – residential | 1,483 | 1,418 | 1,397 | 1,451 | 1,494 | |||||||||
| Corporate bonds | 260 | 358 | 361 | 362 | 476 | |||||||||
| Small Business Administration – guaranteed | ||||||||||||||
| participation securities | 81 | 84 | 90 | 94 | 100 | |||||||||
| Other securities | 7 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 3 | |||||||||
| Total interest and dividends on securities available for sale | 2,427 | 2,546 | 2,568 | 2,819 | 2,979 | |||||||||
| Interest on held to maturity securities: | ||||||||||||||
| obligations – residential | 57 | 59 | 62 | 65 | 68 | |||||||||
| Total interest on held to maturity securities | 57 | 59 | 62 | 65 | 68 | |||||||||
| Federal Home Loan Bank stock | 151 | 152 | 153 | 147 | 152 | |||||||||
| Interest on federal funds sold and other short-term investments | 6,732 | 6,128 | 6,174 | 6,894 | 6,750 | |||||||||
| Total interest income | 62,817 | 61,909 | 61,069 | 60,585 | 59,753 | |||||||||
| Interest expense: | ||||||||||||||
| Interest on deposits: | ||||||||||||||
| Interest-bearing checking | 558 | 397 | 311 | 288 | 240 | |||||||||
| Savings | 734 | 719 | 770 | 675 | 712 | |||||||||
| Money market deposit accounts | 1,989 | 2,024 | 2,154 | 2,228 | 2,342 | |||||||||
| Time deposits | 18,983 | 19,680 | 18,969 | 19,400 | 19,677 | |||||||||
| Interest on short-term borrowings | 180 | 187 | 194 | 206 | 204 | |||||||||
| Total interest expense | 22,444 | 23,007 | 22,398 | 22,797 | 23,175 | |||||||||
| Net interest income | 40,373 | 38,902 | 38,671 | 37,788 | 36,578 | |||||||||
| Less: Provision for credit losses | 300 | 400 | 500 | 500 | 600 | |||||||||
| Net interest income after provision for credit losses | 40,073 | 38,502 | 38,171 | 37,288 | 35,978 | |||||||||
| Noninterest income: | ||||||||||||||
| Trustco Financial Services income | 2,120 | 1,778 | 2,044 | 1,609 | 1,816 | |||||||||
| Fees for services to customers | 2,645 | 2,226 | 2,482 | 2,399 | 2,745 | |||||||||
| Net gains on equity securities | – | – | 23 | 1,360 | – | |||||||||
| Other | 209 | 405 | 382 | 283 | 282 | |||||||||
| Total noninterest income | 4,974 | 4,409 | 4,931 | 5,651 | 4,843 | |||||||||
| Noninterest expenses: | ||||||||||||||
| Salaries and employee benefits | 11,894 | 12,068 | 12,134 | 12,520 | 11,427 | |||||||||
| Net occupancy expense | 4,554 | 4,563 | 4,271 | 4,375 | 4,611 | |||||||||
| Equipment expense | 1,944 | 2,404 | 1,757 | 1,990 | 1,738 | |||||||||
| Professional services | 1,726 | 1,782 | 1,863 | 1,570 | 1,460 | |||||||||
| Outsourced services | 2,700 | 3,051 | 2,551 | 2,755 | 2,501 | |||||||||
| Advertising expense | 361 | 590 | 339 | 466 | 408 | |||||||||
| FDIC and other insurance | 1,188 | 1,113 | 1,112 | 797 | 1,094 | |||||||||
| Other real estate expense, net | 28 | 476 | 204 | 16 | 74 | |||||||||
| Other | 1,934 | 2,118 | 1,969 | 1,970 | 1,590 | |||||||||
| Total noninterest expenses | 26,329 | 28,165 | 26,200 | 26,459 | 24,903 | |||||||||
| Income before taxes | 18,718 | 14,746 | 16,902 | 16,480 | 15,918 | |||||||||
| Income taxes | 4,443 | 3,465 | 4,027 | 3,929 | 3,792 | |||||||||
| Net income | $ | 14,275 | $ | 11,281 | $ | 12,875 | $ | 12,551 | $ | 12,126 | ||||
| Net income per common share: | ||||||||||||||
| – Basic | $ | 0.75 | $ | 0.59 | $ | 0.68 | $ | 0.66 | $ | 0.64 | ||||
| – Diluted | 0.75 | 0.59 | 0.68 | 0.66 | 0.64 | |||||||||
| Average basic shares (in thousands) | 19,020 | 19,015 | 19,010 | 19,022 | 19,024 | |||||||||
| Average diluted shares (in thousands) | 19,044 | 19,045 | 19,036 | 19,033 | 19,032 | |||||||||
| CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION | |||||||||||||||
| (dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||||
| (Unaudited) | |||||||||||||||
| 3/31/2025 | 12/31/2024 | 9/30/2024 | 6/30/3024 | 3/31/2024 | |||||||||||
| ASSETS: | |||||||||||||||
| Cash and due from banks | $ | 48,782 | $ | 47,364 | $ | 49,659 | $ | 42,193 | $ | 44,868 | |||||
| Federal funds sold and other short term investments | 707,355 | 594,448 | 473,306 | 493,920 | 564,815 | ||||||||||
| Total cash and cash equivalents | 756,137 | 641,812 | 522,965 | 536,113 | 609,683 | ||||||||||
| Securities available for sale: | |||||||||||||||
| U. S. government sponsored enterprises | 65,942 | 85,617 | 90,588 | 106,796 | 128,854 | ||||||||||
| States and political subdivisions | 18 | 18 | 26 | 26 | 26 | ||||||||||
| Mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage | |||||||||||||||
| obligations – residential | 219,333 | 213,128 | 222,841 | 218,311 | 227,078 | ||||||||||
| Small Business Administration – guaranteed | |||||||||||||||
| participation securities | 13,683 | 14,141 | 15,171 | 15,592 | 16,260 | ||||||||||
| Corporate bonds | 24,779 | 44,581 | 54,327 | 53,764 | 53,341 | ||||||||||
| Other securities | 698 | 700 | 701 | 688 | 682 | ||||||||||
| Total securities available for sale | 324,453 | 358,185 | 383,654 | 395,177 | 426,241 | ||||||||||
| Held to maturity securities: | |||||||||||||||
| Mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage | |||||||||||||||
| obligations-residential | 5,090 | 5,365 | 5,636 | 5,921 | 6,206 | ||||||||||
| Total held to maturity securities | 5,090 | 5,365 | 5,636 | 5,921 | 6,206 | ||||||||||
| Federal Reserve Bank and Federal Home Loan Bank stock | 6,507 | 6,507 | 6,507 | 6,507 | 6,203 | ||||||||||
| Loans: | |||||||||||||||
| Commercial | 302,753 | 286,857 | 280,261 | 282,441 | 279,092 | ||||||||||
| Residential mortgage loans | 4,380,561 | 4,388,302 | 4,382,674 | 4,370,640 | 4,354,369 | ||||||||||
| Home equity line of credit | 419,806 | 409,261 | 393,418 | 370,063 | 355,879 | ||||||||||
| Installment loans | 13,017 | 13,638 | 14,503 | 15,168 | 16,166 | ||||||||||
| Loans, net of deferred net costs | 5,116,137 | 5,098,058 | 5,070,856 | 5,038,312 | 5,005,506 | ||||||||||
| Less: Allowance for credit losses on loans | 50,606 | 50,248 | 49,950 | 49,772 | 49,220 | ||||||||||
| Net loans | 5,065,531 | 5,047,810 | 5,020,906 | 4,988,540 | 4,956,286 | ||||||||||
| Bank premises and equipment, net | 37,178 | 33,782 | 33,324 | 33,466 | 33,423 | ||||||||||
| Operating lease right-of-use assets | 34,968 | 36,627 | 37,958 | 38,376 | 39,647 | ||||||||||
| Other assets | 108,681 | 108,656 | 98,730 | 102,544 | 101,881 | ||||||||||
| Total assets | $ | 6,338,545 | $ | 6,238,744 | $ | 6,109,680 | $ | 6,106,644 | $ | 6,179,570 | |||||
| LIABILITIES: | |||||||||||||||
| Deposits: | |||||||||||||||
| Demand | $ | 793,306 | $ | 762,101 | $ | 753,878 | $ | 745,227 | $ | 742,997 | |||||
| Interest-bearing checking | 1,067,948 | 1,027,540 | 988,527 | 1,029,606 | 1,020,136 | ||||||||||
| Savings accounts | 1,094,968 | 1,086,534 | 1,092,038 | 1,144,427 | 1,155,517 | ||||||||||
| Money market deposit accounts | 478,872 | 465,049 | 477,113 | 517,445 | 532,611 | ||||||||||
| Time deposits | 2,061,576 | 2,049,759 | 1,952,635 | 1,840,262 | 1,903,908 | ||||||||||
| Total deposits | 5,496,670 | 5,390,983 | 5,264,191 | 5,276,967 | 5,355,169 | ||||||||||
| Short-term borrowings | 82,275 | 84,781 | 91,450 | 89,720 | 94,374 | ||||||||||
| Operating lease liabilities | 38,324 | 40,159 | 41,469 | 42,026 | 43,438 | ||||||||||
| Accrued expenses and other liabilities | 33,468 | 46,478 | 43,549 | 42,763 | 37,399 | ||||||||||
| Total liabilities | 5,650,737 | 5,562,401 | 5,440,659 | 5,451,476 | 5,530,380 | ||||||||||
| SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY: | |||||||||||||||
| Capital stock | 20,097 | 20,097 | 20,058 | 20,058 | 20,058 | ||||||||||
| Surplus | 259,182 | 258,874 | 257,644 | 257,490 | 257,335 | ||||||||||
| Undivided profits | 453,931 | 446,503 | 442,079 | 436,048 | 430,346 | ||||||||||
| Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax | (132 | ) | (3,861 | ) | (6,600 | ) | (14,268 | ) | (14,763 | ) | |||||
| Treasury stock at cost | (45,270 | ) | (45,270 | ) | (44,160 | ) | (44,160 | ) | (43,786 | ) | |||||
| Total shareholders’ equity | 687,808 | 676,343 | 669,021 | 655,168 | 649,190 | ||||||||||
| Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity | $ | 6,338,545 | $ | 6,238,744 | $ | 6,109,680 | $ | 6,106,644 | $ | 6,179,570 | |||||
| Outstanding shares (in thousands) | 19,020 | 19,020 | 19,010 | 19,010 | 19,024 | ||||||||||
| NONPERFORMING ASSETS | ||||||||||||||||
| (dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
| (Unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||
| 3/31/2025 | 12/31/2024 | 9/30/2024 | 6/30/2024 | 3/31/2024 | ||||||||||||
| Nonperforming Assets | ||||||||||||||||
| New York and other states* | ||||||||||||||||
| Loans in nonaccrual status: | ||||||||||||||||
| Commercial | $ | 688 | $ | 343 | $ | 466 | $ | 741 | $ | 532 | ||||||
| Real estate mortgage – 1 to 4 family | 14,795 | 14,671 | 15,320 | 14,992 | 14,359 | |||||||||||
| Installment | 139 | 108 | 163 | 131 | 149 | |||||||||||
| Total non-accrual loans | 15,622 | 15,122 | 15,949 | 15,864 | 15,040 | |||||||||||
| Other nonperforming real estate mortgages – 1 to 4 family | – | – | – | – | – | |||||||||||
| Total nonperforming loans | 15,622 | 15,122 | 15,949 | 15,864 | 15,040 | |||||||||||
| Other real estate owned | 2,107 | 2,175 | 2,503 | 2,334 | 2,334 | |||||||||||
| Total nonperforming assets | $ | 17,729 | $ | 17,297 | $ | 18,452 | $ | 18,198 | $ | 17,374 | ||||||
| Florida | ||||||||||||||||
| Loans in nonaccrual status: | ||||||||||||||||
| Commercial | $ | – | $ | – | $ | 314 | $ | 314 | $ | 314 | ||||||
| Real estate mortgage – 1 to 4 family | 3,135 | 3,656 | 3,176 | 2,985 | 2,921 | |||||||||||
| Installment | 3 | 22 | 5 | 22 | – | |||||||||||
| Total non-accrual loans | 3,138 | 3,678 | 3,495 | 3,321 | 3,235 | |||||||||||
| Other nonperforming real estate mortgages – 1 to 4 family | – | – | – | – | – | |||||||||||
| Total nonperforming loans | 3,138 | 3,678 | 3,495 | 3,321 | 3,235 | |||||||||||
| Other real estate owned | – | – | – | – | – | |||||||||||
| Total nonperforming assets | $ | 3,138 | $ | 3,678 | $ | 3,495 | $ | 3,321 | $ | 3,235 | ||||||
| Total | ||||||||||||||||
| Loans in nonaccrual status: | ||||||||||||||||
| Commercial | $ | 688 | $ | 343 | $ | 780 | $ | 1,055 | $ | 846 | ||||||
| Real estate mortgage – 1 to 4 family | 17,930 | 18,327 | 18,496 | 17,977 | 17,280 | |||||||||||
| Installment | 142 | 130 | 168 | 153 | 149 | |||||||||||
| Total non-accrual loans | 18,760 | 18,800 | 19,444 | 19,185 | 18,275 | |||||||||||
| Other nonperforming real estate mortgages – 1 to 4 family | – | – | – | – | – | |||||||||||
| Total nonperforming loans | 18,760 | 18,800 | 19,444 | 19,185 | 18,275 | |||||||||||
| Other real estate owned | 2,107 | 2,175 | 2,503 | 2,334 | 2,334 | |||||||||||
| Total nonperforming assets | $ | 20,867 | $ | 20,975 | $ | 21,947 | $ | 21,519 | $ | 20,609 | ||||||
| Quarterly Net (Recoveries) Chargeoffs | ||||||||||||||||
| New York and other states* | ||||||||||||||||
| Commercial | $ | (3 | ) | $ | 62 | $ | 65 | $ | – | $ | – | |||||
| Real estate mortgage – 1 to 4 family | 41 | (316 | ) | 104 | (74 | ) | (78 | ) | ||||||||
| Installment | 4 | 41 | 11 | (2 | ) | 36 | ||||||||||
| Total net chargeoffs (recoveries) | $ | 42 | $ | (213 | ) | $ | 180 | $ | (76 | ) | $ | (42 | ) | |||
| Florida | ||||||||||||||||
| Commercial | $ | (315 | ) | $ | 314 | $ | – | $ | – | $ | – | |||||
| Real estate mortgage – 1 to 4 family | – | – | – | 17 | – | |||||||||||
| Installment | 15 | 1 | 42 | 7 | – | |||||||||||
| Total net (recoveries) chargeoffs | $ | (300 | ) | $ | 315 | $ | 42 | $ | 24 | $ | – | |||||
| Total | ||||||||||||||||
| Commercial | $ | (318 | ) | $ | 376 | $ | 65 | $ | – | $ | – | |||||
| Real estate mortgage – 1 to 4 family | 41 | (316 | ) | 104 | (57 | ) | (78 | ) | ||||||||
| Installment | 19 | 42 | 53 | 5 | 36 | |||||||||||
| Total net (recoveries) chargeoffs | $ | (258 | ) | $ | 102 | $ | 222 | $ | (52 | ) | $ | (42 | ) | |||
| Asset Quality Ratios | ||||||||||||||||
| Total nonperforming loans (1) | $ | 18,760 | $ | 18,800 | $ | 19,444 | $ | 19,185 | $ | 18,275 | ||||||
| Total nonperforming assets (1) | 20,867 | 20,975 | 21,947 | 21,519 | 20,609 | |||||||||||
| Total net (recoveries) chargeoffs (2) | (258 | ) | 102 | 222 | (52 | ) | (42 | ) | ||||||||
| Allowance for credit losses on loans (1) | 50,606 | 50,248 | 49,950 | 49,772 | 49,220 | |||||||||||
| Nonperforming loans to total loans | 0.37 | % | 0.37 | % | 0.38 | % | 0.38 | % | 0.37 | % | ||||||
| Nonperforming assets to total assets | 0.33 | % | 0.34 | % | 0.36 | % | 0.35 | % | 0.33 | % | ||||||
| Allowance for credit losses on loans to total loans | 0.99 | % | 0.99 | % | 0.99 | % | 0.99 | % | 0.98 | % | ||||||
| Coverage ratio (1) | 269.8 | % | 267.3 | % | 256.9 | % | 259.4 | % | 269.3 | % | ||||||
| Annualized net (recoveries) chargeoffs to average loans (2) | -0.02 | % | 0.01 | % | 0.02 | % | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | ||||||
| Allowance for credit losses on loans to annualized net chargeoffs (2) | N/A | 123.2x | 56.3x | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||
| * Includes New York, New Jersey, Vermont and Massachusetts. | ||||||||||||||||
| (1) At period-end | ||||||||||||||||
| (2) For the three-month period ended | ||||||||||||||||
| DISTRIBUTION OF ASSETS, LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY – | |||||||||||||||||
| INTEREST RATES AND INTEREST DIFFERENTIAL | |||||||||||||||||
| (dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||
| (Unaudited) | Three months ended | Three months ended | |||||||||||||||
| March 31, 2025 | March 31, 2024 | ||||||||||||||||
| Average | Interest | Average | Average | Interest | Average | ||||||||||||
| Balance | Rate | Balance | Rate | ||||||||||||||
| Assets | |||||||||||||||||
| Securities available for sale: | |||||||||||||||||
| U. S. government sponsored enterprises | $ | 74,680 | $ | 596 | 3.19 | % | $ | 125,973 | $ | 906 | 2.88 | % | |||||
| Mortgage backed securities and collateralized mortgage | |||||||||||||||||
| obligations – residential | 239,509 | 1,483 | 2.46 | 258,814 | 1,494 | 2.30 | |||||||||||
| State and political subdivisions | 18 | – | 6.77 | 26 | 0 | 6.90 | |||||||||||
| Corporate bonds | 40,019 | 260 | 2.60 | 73,625 | 476 | 2.59 | |||||||||||
| Small Business Administration – guaranteed | |||||||||||||||||
| participation securities | 15,003 | 81 | 2.15 | 18,224 | 100 | 2.20 | |||||||||||
| Other | 699 | 7 | 4.01 | 696 | 3 | 1.72 | |||||||||||
| Total securities available for sale | 369,928 | 2,427 | 2.62 | 477,358 | 2,979 | 2.50 | |||||||||||
| Federal funds sold and other short-term Investments | 613,646 | 6,732 | 4.45 | 497,652 | 6,750 | 5.45 | |||||||||||
| Held to maturity securities: | |||||||||||||||||
| Mortgage backed securities and collateralized mortgage | |||||||||||||||||
| obligations – residential | 5,233 | 57 | 4.34 | 6,329 | 68 | 4.30 | |||||||||||
| Total held to maturity securities | 5,233 | 57 | 4.34 | 6,329 | 68 | 4.30 | |||||||||||
| Federal Home Loan Bank stock | 6,507 | 151 | 9.28 | 6,203 | 152 | 9.80 | |||||||||||
| Commercial loans | 297,926 | 4,165 | 5.59 | 277,183 | 3,661 | 5.28 | |||||||||||
| Residential mortgage loans | 4,385,646 | 42,614 | 3.89 | 4,359,476 | 40,415 | 3.71 | |||||||||||
| Home equity lines of credit | 413,981 | 6,435 | 6.30 | 353,004 | 5,464 | 6.22 | |||||||||||
| Installment loans | 12,967 | 236 | 7.37 | 16,128 | 264 | 6.58 | |||||||||||
| Loans, net of unearned income | 5,110,520 | 53,450 | 4.19 | 5,005,791 | 49,804 | 3.98 | |||||||||||
| Total interest earning assets | 6,105,834 | $ | 62,817 | 4.13 | 5,993,333 | $ | 59,753 | 3.99 | |||||||||
| Allowance for credit losses on loans | (50,475 | ) | (48,824 | ) | |||||||||||||
| Cash & non-interest earning assets | 201,154 | 185,230 | |||||||||||||||
| Total assets | $ | 6,256,513 | $ | 6,129,739 | |||||||||||||
| Liabilities and shareholders’ equity | |||||||||||||||||
| Deposits: | |||||||||||||||||
| Interest bearing checking accounts | $ | 1,038,218 | $ | 558 | 0.22 | % | $ | 990,130 | $ | 240 | 0.10 | % | |||||
| Money market accounts | 469,070 | 1,989 | 1.72 | 544,687 | 2,342 | 1.73 | |||||||||||
| Savings | 1,089,358 | 734 | 0.27 | 1,158,558 | 712 | 0.25 | |||||||||||
| Time deposits | 2,054,494 | 18,984 | 3.75 | 1,889,929 | 19,677 | 4.19 | |||||||||||
| Total interest bearing deposits | 4,651,140 | 22,265 | 1.94 | 4,583,304 | 22,971 | 2.02 | |||||||||||
| Short-term borrowings | 83,207 | 180 | 0.88 | 93,316 | 204 | 0.88 | |||||||||||
| Total interest bearing liabilities | 4,734,347 | $ | 22,445 | 1.92 | 4,676,620 | $ | 23,175 | 1.99 | |||||||||
| Demand deposits | 761,800 | 726,299 | |||||||||||||||
| Other liabilities | 78,748 | 80,158 | |||||||||||||||
| Shareholders’ equity | 681,618 | 646,662 | |||||||||||||||
| Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity | $ | 6,256,513 | $ | 6,129,739 | |||||||||||||
| Net interest income | $ | 40,372 | $ | 36,578 | |||||||||||||
| Net interest spread | 2.21 | % | 2.00 | % | |||||||||||||
| Net interest margin (net interest income to | |||||||||||||||||
| total interest earning assets) | 2.64 | % | 2.44 | % | |||||||||||||
Non-GAAP Financial Measures Reconciliation
Tangible book value per share is a non-GAAP financial measure derived from GAAP-based amounts. We calculate tangible book value by excluding the balance of intangible assets from total shareholders’ equity divided by shares outstanding. We believe that this is consistent with the treatment by bank regulatory agencies, which exclude intangible assets from the calculation of risk-based capital ratios. Additionally, we believe that this measure is important to many investors in the marketplace who are interested in relative changes from period to period in equity exclusive of changes in intangible assets.
Tangible equity as a percentage of tangible assets at period end is a non-GAAP financial measure derived from GAAP-based amounts. We calculate tangible equity and tangible assets by excluding the balance of intangible assets from total shareholders’ equity and total assets, respectively. We calculate tangible equity as a percentage of tangible assets at period end by dividing tangible equity by tangible assets at period end. We believe that this is consistent with the treatment by bank regulatory agencies, which exclude intangible assets from the calculation of risk-based capital ratios. Additionally, we believe that this measure is important to many investors in the marketplace who are interested in relative changes from period to period in equity and total assets, each exclusive of changes in intangible assets.
Adjusted efficiency ratio is a non-GAAP measures of expense control relative to revenue from net interest income and non-interest fee income. We calculate the efficiency ratio by dividing total non-interest expense by the sum of net interest income and total non-interest income. We calculate the adjusted efficiency ratio by dividing total noninterest expenses as determined under GAAP, excluding other real estate expense, net, by net interest income and total noninterest income as determined under GAAP. We believe that this provides a reasonable measure of primary banking expenses relative to primary banking revenue. Additionally, we believe this measure is important to investors looking for a measure of efficiency in our productivity measured by the amount of revenue generated for each dollar spent.
We believe that these non-GAAP financial measures provide information that is important to investors and that is useful in understanding our financial results. Our management internally assesses our performance based, in part, on these measures. However, these non-GAAP financial measures are supplemental and not a substitute for an analysis based on GAAP measures. As other companies may use different calculations for these measures, this presentation may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures reported by other companies. A reconciliation of the non-GAAP measures of tangible book value to shares outstanding, tangible equity as a percentage of tangible assets, and efficiency ratio to the most directly comparable GAAP measures is set forth below.
| NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES RECONCILIATION | ||||||||||
| (dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||
| (Unaudited) | ||||||||||
| 3/31/2025 | 12/31/2024 | 3/31/2024 | ||||||||
| Tangible Book Value Per Share | ||||||||||
| Equity (GAAP) | $ | 687,808 | $ | 676,343 | $ | 649,190 | ||||
| Less: Intangible assets | 553 | 553 | 553 | |||||||
| Tangible equity (Non-GAAP) | $ | 687,255 | $ | 675,790 | $ | 648,637 | ||||
| Shares outstanding | 19,020 | 19,020 | 19,024 | |||||||
| Tangible book value per share | 36.13 | 35.53 | 34.10 | |||||||
| Book value per share | 36.16 | 35.56 | 34.12 | |||||||
| Tangible Equity to Tangible Assets | ||||||||||
| Total Assets (GAAP) | $ | 6,338,545 | $ | 6,238,744 | $ | 6,179,570 | ||||
| Less: Intangible assets | 553 | 553 | 553 | |||||||
| Tangible assets (Non-GAAP) | $ | 6,337,992 | $ | 6,238,191 | $ | 6,179,017 | ||||
| Equity to Assets (GAAP) | 10.85 | % | 10.84 | % | 10.51 | % | ||||
| Tangible Equity to Tangible Assets (Non-GAAP) | 10.84 | % | 10.83 | % | 10.50 | % | ||||
| Three months ended | ||||||||||
| Efficiency and Adjusted Efficiency Ratios | 3/31/2025 | 12/31/2024 | 3/31/2024 | |||||||
| Net interest income (GAAP) | A | $ | 40,373 | $ | 38,902 | $ | 36,578 | |||
| Non-interest income (GAAP) | B | 4,974 | 4,409 | 4,843 | ||||||
| Revenue used for efficiency ratio (GAAP) | C | $ | 45,347 | $ | 43,311 | $ | 41,421 | |||
| Total noninterest expense (GAAP) | D | $ | 26,329 | $ | 28,165 | $ | 24,903 | |||
| Less: Other real estate expense, net | E | 28 | 476 | 74 | ||||||
| Expense used for efficiency ratio (Non-GAAP) | F | $ | 26,301 | $ | 27,689 | $ | 24,829 | |||
| Efficiency Ratio (GAAP) | D/C | 58.06 | % | 65.03 | % | 59.94 | % | |||
| Adjusted Efficiency Ratio (Non-GAAP) | F/C | 58.00 | % | 63.93 | % | 59.94 | % | |||
| Subsidiary: | Trustco Bank | |
| Contact: | Robert Leonard | |
| Executive Vice President | ||
| (518) 381-3693 |
Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)
BOSTON, April 21, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — CarGurus, Inc. (Nasdaq: CARG), the No. 1 visited digital auto platform for shopping, buying, and selling new and used vehicles1, announced it will issue a press release reporting financial results for the quarter ended March 31, 2025, after the close of the market on May 8, 2025.
CarGurus will host a conference call and live webcast to discuss those financial results for investors and analysts at 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on May 8, 2025. To access the conference call, dial (877) 451-6152 for the U.S. or Canada, or (201) 389-0879 for international callers. The webcast will be available live on the Investors section of the company’s website at https://investors.cargurus.com.
An audio replay of the call will also be available to investors beginning at approximately 8:00 p.m. Eastern Time on May 8, 2025, until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on May 22, 2025, by dialing (844) 512-2921 for the U.S. or Canada, or (412) 317-6671 for international callers, and entering passcode 13752230. In addition, an archived webcast will be available on the Investors section of the company’s website at https://investors.cargurus.com.
About CarGurus, Inc.
CarGurus (Nasdaq: CARG) is a multinational, online automotive platform for buying and selling vehicles that is building upon its industry-leading listings marketplace with both digital retail solutions and the CarOffer online wholesale platform. The CarGurus platform gives consumers the confidence to purchase and/or sell a vehicle either online or in-person, and it gives dealerships the power to accurately price, effectively market, instantly acquire, and quickly sell vehicles, all with a nationwide reach. The company uses proprietary technology, search algorithms, and data analytics to bring trust, transparency, and competitive pricing to the automotive shopping experience. CarGurus is the most visited automotive shopping site in the U.S. 1
In addition to the U.S. marketplace, the company operates online marketplaces under the CarGurus brand in Canada and the U.K., as well as independent online marketplace brands Autolist in the U.S. and PistonHeads in the U.K.
To learn more about CarGurus, visit www.cargurus.com, and for more information about CarOffer, visit www.caroffer.com.
CarGurus® is a registered trademark of CarGurus, Inc., and CarOffer® is a registered trademark of CarOffer, LLC. All other product names, trademarks, and registered trademarks are the property of their respective owners.
1Similarweb: Traffic Report [Cars.com, Autotrader, TrueCar, CARFAX Listings (defined as CARFAX Total visits minus Vehicle History Reports traffic)], Q4 2024, U.S.
Investor Contact:
Kirndeep Singh
Vice President, Head of Investor Relations
investors@cargurus.com
Media Contact:
Maggie Meluzio
Director, Public Relations & External Communications
pr@cargurus.com
Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)
EATONTOWN, N.J., April 21, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Climb Global Solutions, Inc. (NASDAQ:CLMB) (“Climb” or the “Company”), a value-added global IT channel company providing unique sales and distribution solutions for innovative technology vendors, today announced that the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) has elected Paul Giovacchini to the Board. With the election of Mr. Giovacchini, Climb’s Board increased to seven total members, six of whom are independent under the Nasdaq listing standards.
Mr. Giovacchini brings over 30 years of experience in private equity, corporate governance, and board leadership across public and private companies. He currently serves as the Lead Independent Director of TPI Composites, Inc. (NASDAQ:TPIC), where he previously served as Chairman and helped lead the company’s transformation into a global public enterprise. Mr. Giovacchini also serves as an independent consulting advisor to Advantage Capital Management, supporting private equity and debt investment strategies. Mr. Giovacchini holds a B.A. in Economics from Stanford University and an M.B.A. from Harvard Business School.
“Paul brings a wealth of executive leadership, investment expertise, and operational insight to our Board,” said John McCarthy, Chairman of the Board. “His extensive experience across public and private enterprises, coupled with his strong financial background, will be invaluable as we continue to strengthen our operational foundation and advance our organic and inorganic growth initiatives.”
Mr. Giovacchini stated, “Climb has built an impressive platform in the global IT channel, distinguished by its strong partnerships and consistent execution. As the Company enters its next chapter of growth, I’m honored to join the Board and contribute to its continued success. I look forward to leveraging my experience in governance, finance, and global expansion to support Climb’s long-term vision both domestically and abroad.”
About Climb Global Solutions
Climb Global Solutions, Inc. (NASDAQ:CLMB) is a value-added global IT distribution and solutions company specializing in emerging and innovative technologies. Climb operates across the US, Canada and Europe through multiple business units, including Climb Channel Solutions, Grey Matter and Climb Global Services. The Company provides IT distribution and solutions for companies in the Security, Data Management, Connectivity, Storage & HCI, Virtualization & Cloud, and Software & ALM industries.
Additional information can be found by visiting www.climbglobalsolutions.com.
Forward-Looking Statements
The statements in this release, other than statements of historical fact, are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and are intended to come within the safe harbor protection provided by those sections. These forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties. Many of the forward-looking statements may be identified by words such as ”look forward,” “believes,” “expects,” “intends,” “anticipates,” “plans,” “estimates,” “projects,” “forecasts,” “should,” “could,” “would,” “will,” “confident,” “may,” “can,” “potential,” “possible,” “proposed,” “in process,” “under construction,” “in development,” “opportunity,” “target,” “outlook,” “maintain,” “continue,” “goal,” “aim,” “commit,” or similar expressions, or when we discuss our priorities, strategy, goals, vision, mission, opportunities, projections, intentions or expectations. In this press release, the forward-looking statements relate to, among other things, declaring and reaffirming our strategic goals, future operating results, and the effects and potential benefits of the strategic acquisition on our business. Factors, among others, that could cause actual results and events to differ materially from those described in any forward-looking statements include, without limitation, statements concerning our plans and expectations in connection with the addition to the Board and other plans and expectations. The forward-looking statements contained herein are also subject generally to other risks and uncertainties that are described in the section entitled “Risk Factors” contained in Item 1A. of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, and from time to time in the Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Company Contact
Matthew Sullivan
Chief Financial Officer
(732) 847-2451
MatthewS@ClimbCS.com
Investor Relations Contact
Sean Mansouri, CFA or Aaron D’Souza
Elevate IR
(720) 330-2829
CLMB@elevate-ir.com
Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)
NEW YORK, April 21, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Kaltura (Nasdaq: KLTR), the Video Experience Cloud, today announced it will release its first quarter financial results for the period ended March 31, 2025, before market open on Thursday, May 8, 2025.
Management will host a conference call to review the Company’s first quarter 2025 financial results and discuss the financial outlook.
| Date: | Thursday, May 8, 2025 |
| Time: | 8:00 a.m. ET |
| United States/Canada Toll Free: | 1-877-407-0789 |
| International Toll: | +1-201-689-8562 |
A live and archived webcast will be available in the Investor Relations section of Kaltura’s website at: https://investors.kaltura.com/news-and-events/events
About Kaltura
Kaltura’s mission is to create and power AI-infused hyper-personalized video experiences that boost customer and employee engagement and success. Kaltura’s AI Video Experience Cloud includes a platform for enterprise and TV content management and a wide array of Gen AI-infused video-first products, including Video Portals, LMS and CMS Video Extensions, Virtual Events and Webinars, Virtual Classrooms, and TV Streaming Applications. Kaltura engages millions of end-users at home, at work, and at school, boosting both customer and employee experiences, including marketing, sales, and customer success; teaching, learning, training and certification; communication and collaboration; and entertainment and monetization. For more information, visit www.corp.kaltura.com.
Investor Contacts:
Kaltura, Inc.
John Doherty
Chief Financial Officer
IR@Kaltura.com
Sapphire Investor Relations, LLC
Erica Mannion and Michael Funari
IR@Kaltura.com
+1-617-542-6180
Media Contacts:
Kaltura, Inc.
Nohar Zmora
pr.team@kaltura.com
Headline Media
Raanan Loew
raanan@headline.media
+1-347-897-9276