Category: Asia Pacific

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Frogs impacted by predators, climate change

    Source: Department of Conservation

    Date:  18 February 2025

    An independent panel of experts has assessed all 20 frog species and sub-species found in New Zealand, and one newt. Four species have declined in status, and none have improved.

    Dr Rhys Burns, DOC’s lead on the assessment panel, says Hamilton’s frogs and one subspecies of Hochstetter’s frog are in serious trouble while Archey’s frogs have higher numbers than previously thought, but are still declining mainly due to the impact of introduced mammals.

    “The current Archey’s adult frog population, previously estimated as between 5,000 and 20,000, has been revised to over 100,000 individuals.

    “Surveys of Archey’s frog in central-southern Coromandel and Whareorino (western King Country) over the past few years have identified higher numbers than previously known. However, their conservation status remains At Risk – Declining, primarily due to predation by rats and mice.”  

    Hamilton’s frog, mainly found on Te Pākeka/Maud Island, Takapourewa/Stephen’s Island and a few smaller translocated populations at other sites, was moved into Threatened – Nationally Critical. Monitoring indicates a decline in the size of the largest population found on Te Pākeka Island.

    The actual cause of the decline isn’t known, but possibilities include climate impact, predation from mice and weka, direct or secondary poisoning from two brodifacoum operations in 2014 and 2019 to eradicate two mouse incursions on the island, the impact of a frog fungus recently found on the island, or a combination of these factors.

    DOC will take all these possibilities into account for future frog management planning on Te Pākeka.

    Climate change impact was added to the assessment for the first time – an acknowledgement that climate pressures are increasing for most frog species.

    “Changes in rainfall and temperature dry the forest understorey where land-based frogs such as Archey’s and Hamilton’s live,” Rhys says.

    “Long periods of high temperatures and dry periods temporarily dry out streams and areas of water seepage that Hochstetter’s frogs rely on. Large storms affect Hochstetter’s frogs that use stream habitat, by increasing water flows, siltation, and in extreme situations, landslides.”

    Rhys says we recently saw the devasting impact of severe weather on the already-fragile Hochstetter’s frog population.

    “Following the severe rainfall events of January 2023, a major slip in Otawa, near Te Puke, destroyed the habitat of the ‘Otawa’ Hochstetter’s frogs, resulting in an estimated loss of 30-40 per cent of the frog population in one night.

    “‘Otawa’ Hochstetter’s frogs were assessed as Threatened – Nationally Critical in this and previous assessments, so the loss was a huge blow. DOC is doing pest control at this site to try to support the recovery of this population.”

    Other Hochstetter’s frog populations were assessed as threatened or declining largely due to the impact of predation by introduced mammals.

    Rhys says frogs are challenging to survey. “They range from the size of a thumbnail to the length of a thumb, and often live in remote places. It’s resource-hungry work.

    “We hope more organisations – whether they’re iwi, other agencies, businesses or community groups – consider researching and surveying frogs.

    “The more high-quality information we have, the better we can protect these taonga species. Our frogs are unique to New Zealand, so if they go from here, they’re gone from everywhere.”

    Conservation status of amphibians in Aotearoa New Zealand, 2024

    Background information

    New Zealand native frogs/pepeketua belong to the genus Leiopelma, an ancient group of frogs that has changed very little in 70 million years.

    New Zealand’s native frogs have several distinctive features that make them very different from frogs elsewhere in the world: they have no external eardrum, they have round (not slit) eyes, and they don’t croak

    Archey’s and Hamilton’s frogs also don’t have a tadpole stage. The embryo develops inside an egg, and then hatches as a tiny almost fully formed frog.

    Contact

    For media enquiries contact:

    Email: media@doc.govt.nz

    MIL OSI New Zealand News

  • MIL-OSI United Nations: Use Upcoming Tenth Anniversary of Minsk Accord’s Signing to Renew Diplomatic Efforts towards De-escalation in Ukraine, Assistant Secretary-General Urges Security Council

    Source: United Nations MIL OSI b

    The Minsk Agreements show that the signing of a peace pact alone does not ensure a durable end to conflict, the Security Council heard today as it met a decade after the adoption of Council resolution 2202 (2015), which called for the full implementation of those accords.

    The international community must use the 10-year anniversary as an opportunity to “recall past diplomatic efforts towards de-escalation” as well as reflect “on what happens when peacemaking fails”, Miroslav Jenča, Assistant Secretary-General for Europe, Central Asia and Americas in the Departments of Political and Peacebuilding Affairs and Peace Operations, said.  He noted that in one week, it will be “three tragic years” since the Russian Federation’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine.

    Highlighting the crucial role of regional and subregional organizations, he praised the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) Special Monitoring Mission for monitoring ceasefire violations and helping to maintain dialogue for “eight difficult years”.  Any peaceful settlement must respect the sovereignty, independence and territorial integrity of Ukraine, he said, welcoming all initiatives with the full participation of Ukraine and the Russian Federation.  Ensuring the conflict does not reoccur or escalate requires genuine political will and understanding of its “multidimensional complexity”, he said.

    Peace Activist Haunted by Dead Ukrainian, Russian Soldiers, Says War Could Have Been Avoided through Diplomacy

    “The people of Ukraine are divided – they are either pro- or anti-Russian,” stated Roger Waters, civil peace activist, who also addressed the Council today.  To those questioning his credentials, he said:  “I’m here to talk about war and peace and love, and my credentials are firmly in place.” “Hundreds of thousands of dead Ukrainian and Russian soldiers […] are in this room with us today [and] they haunt me,” he said. 

    Recalling the Maidan protests in Kyiv, he stressed that this is one of the problems with regime change — “dead bodies, they are somebody’s loved one”. Immediately after the Government change in 2014, Crimea seceded from Ukraine and joined the Russian Federation. “Did it secede or was it annexed?” he asked, pointing to a referendum held at the time, in which 95 per cent of Ukrainians in Crimea voted to secede. 

    The agreements — Minsk I, signed in September 2014, and Minsk II, in February 2015 — outlined steps for ending the conflict in eastern Ukraine through a political settlement.  The latter accord stipulated a ceasefire in certain areas of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions and the withdrawal of military equipment by both sides.  It also included a commitment by Kyiv to organize local elections and grant special status to the separatist-held areas in eastern Ukraine and the reinstatement of Ukraine’s full control over its border.

    Mr. Waters said that despite campaigning on the promise to resume Minsk II, Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, who came to power in 2019, did not do so, and in 2022, Russian troops crossed the border to Ukraine. This war could have been avoided through diplomacy, he insisted, adding that President Zelenskyy had started talking to Russian President Vladimir Putin and by the end of April 2014, a ceasefire agreement had been agreed upon in Istanbul.  The war could have been a stillborn, but then United Kingdom Prime Minister Boris Johnson arrived in Kyiv with the message that the war should be continued as it “suits the Americans” — “the longer it takes, the better”. 

    Citing the telephone talks between United States President Donald Trump and President Putin as a potential move in the right direction, he concluded:  “Maybe there is a glimmer of light at the end of this dark tunnel of war — it comes three years and hundreds of thousands of priceless lives too late, but maybe it’s a start.”

    United States Committed to Ending Carnage, Restoring Europe’s Stability, its Speaker Says 

    Washington, D.C., is committed to ending the carnage and restoring Europe’s stability, the representative of the United States said, adding:  “We want a sovereign and prosperous Ukraine but we must start by recognizing that returning to Ukraine’s pre-2014 borders is an unrealistic objective.”  Further, he added:  “Chasing this illusionary goal will only prolong the war and cause more suffering.” At the same time, he underscored that the Russian Federation has consistently undermined the Minsk Agreement; therefore, a durable peace for Ukraine must include robust security guarantees to ensure the war will not begin again.  Describing Moscow’s illegal war of conquest as “a strategic error”, he said that “the easy way out is through negotiations”.  If Moscow, instead, “chooses the hard way”, it will incur greater and escalating costs to its economy and losses on the battlefield, he warned. 

    New United States Administration Has Created Space for Diplomacy, Russian Federation’s Representative Says 

    For his part, the Russian Federation’s delegate said that “the entry into office of the Republican United States Administration” has created space for the emergence of diplomacy.  Those who seized power in Ukraine, following the 2014 anti-constitutional coup, had no intention of implementing the Minsk Agreements, he said.  Citing statements by various Ukrainian officials who described the Agreements as “a noose on the neck” and “not binding in nature”, he said the Agreements were “a smokescreen” for Western countries while they provided Ukraine armaments. 

    Outlining lessons to draw from the failure of the Minsk process, he said European Union countries and the United Kingdom are “unfaithful to their word and they cannot be a party to any future agreement”.  Also stressing the need to provide autonomy to the east of Ukraine and guarantees for its Russian language population, he said that President Zelenskyy “is deathly afraid of elections and is doing everything possible to drag them out”.  A future Ukraine needs to be “a demilitarized neutral State, not a part of any blocs or alliances,” he said, adding that it was the prospect of the entry of Ukraine into the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) that triggered the crisis.

    Entire History of Minsk Agreement “Long List of Violations’ by Moscow”, Ukraine’s Delegate Says

    However, Ukraine’s delegate countered that the entire history of the Minsk Agreements “was a long list of violations” by Moscow.  In 2022, “on this very day”, “in this very chamber”, when her country expressed concern about the buildup of troops along its border and other developments, the Russian Federation had underscored that there is no alternative to the Minsk Agreements, she recalled.  Four days later, that country recognized the so-called independence of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions of Ukraine.  Among others, it never implemented paragraph 4 of the Minsk Protocol, concerning the establishment of a security area in the border regions of the two countries, she said.

     “It is because people of Ukraine are pro-Ukrainian [that] the Russian Federation has failed,” she added.  Any future arrangement involving the Kremlin must include enforcement mechanisms and preventive measures, she stressed, adding:  “What responsible States see as commitments to be upheld, the Russian Federation treats as a tactical ploy.”  Ukraine is working with its partners to find strong solutions, she said, stressing:  “Weak agreements will not bring real peace; they will only lead to the greater war.” 

    Other Council Members Weigh In

    Denmark’s delegate described the current meeting as “part of an ongoing disinformation campaign” to try and distract the international community from the subjugation of Ukraine.  Welcoming Ukraine’s ratification of the Rome Statute, she expressed support for a special tribunal to investigate crimes conducted in that country.  While “no one wants this war to end more than Ukraine”, the United Kingdom’s delegate said, President Putin’s preconditions for talks have been that Ukraine withdraws from large swathes of its own sovereign territory and abandons its right to choose its alliances.  “No country could accept this,” she said, reaffirming that London will provide concrete support for Ukraine for as long as needed. 

    “The Minsk Agreements were a diplomatic initiative designed to prevent further bloodshed and establish a political pathway to peace in Ukraine,” said Germany’s representative, adding that Moscow obstructed its implementation and chose to pursue expansionist conquest.  “This war should not have been started in the first place,” she stressed, calling on all States to unite behind the draft General Assembly resolution on advancing peace in Ukraine.  Along similar lines, France’s delegate highlighted the tireless mediation by Paris and Berlin, to enable Ukraine and Russian Federation to find common ground. However, Moscow chose war, he said, while Greece’s delegate stressed that “no interpretation of the Minsk Agreements can ever justify the invasion of Ukraine”.

    “We need something more than Minsk III,” Slovenia’s delegate said, adding that the abstract nature of the Agreements allowed for multiple interpretations.  Any future accord must be much be more specific with clear timelines, defined sequencing and a monitoring mechanism, he stressed.  Similarly, Somalia’s delegate underscored the importance of clarity, particularly in diplomatic tools, and said the implementation of ceasefire provisions requires robust and impartial verifying mechanisms.  The Republic of Korea’s delegate stressed that “the entire world is well aware of who is aggressor and who is the victim,” also adding that the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea’s support of the Russian Federation, with troops and munitions, is a grave violation of the Organization’s resolutions. 

    Several speakers expressed concern about the failure of diplomacy, while others called on the international community to rally behind new diplomatic efforts.  Since the onset of the Ukraine crisis, Beijing has been calling for a political solution through dialogue and has been actively engaged in diplomatic mediations, China’s representative, Council President for the month, said in his national capacity.  The legitimate security concerns of all countries should be taken seriously, he said, welcoming the Washington, D.C.-Moscow agreement to start peace talks. 

    “We have been consistent in our calls for restraint,” said Pakistan’s delegate, as he expressed regret that the Minsk Agreement could not reach just and lasting peace in the region.  “We must learn from the past so we do not commit the same errors,” Panama’s delegate added, stressing that dialogue and diplomacy is the only path to peace. 

    “The failed implementation of the Minsk Agreement cannot be the reason to prolong this war,” said Guyana’s delegate, reiterating calls for an end to the hostilities and for the withdrawal of Russian Federation’s forces from Ukraine’s territory.  “Until this day more and more civilians are losing their lives, including women and children,” pointed out Algeria’s representative, while Sierra Leone’s delegate underscored that “the conflict in Ukraine will not be resolved by military means”.

    MIL OSI United Nations News

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Auckland Harbour Bridge maintenance – changes to Te Onewa Pā/ Stokes Point Reserve access

    Source: New Zealand Transport Agency

    NZ Transport Agency Waka Kotahi will be carrying out maintenance and repairs on Span 1 of the Auckland Harbour Bridge, which is located over Te Onewa Pā/ Stokes Point Reserve.

    Work began yesterday (Monday 17 February) and will continue through to January 2026. Works will be carried out Monday to Friday, from 7am to 5.30pm.

    Between now and June, contractors will be erecting scaffolding on the centre and eastern side of the Pā, and carrying out work in an enclosed space, which will reduce noise and dust. 

    During this time, the public can access Te Onewa Pā/ Stokes Point Reserve using the western entrance. The eastern entrance will be closed. 

    In June, contractors will extend the scaffolding over the western side of the Pā and there will be no public access to Te Onewa Pā/ Stokes Point Reserve until January 2026.

    NZTA recognises this is part of a popular walking path for the community and thanks everyone for their support and patience while we complete this essential maintenance. 

    To view the latest schedule please go to:

    Upcoming maintenance(external link)  

    MIL OSI New Zealand News

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: REMINDER: Keeping State Highway 6 in tip top shape – night closures begin next week

    Source: New Zealand Transport Agency

    Regular users of State Highway 6 between Rai Valley and Hira need to be ready for three weeks of night closures starting next week.

    Resurfacing and maintenance work is scheduled for the Whangamoa Saddle from 23 February until 13 March.

    During this time State Highway 6 between Hira and Rai Valley will be closed from 8 pm to 5.30 am, Sunday to Thursday nights. No work will be done on Friday and Saturdays.

    To take advantage of this closure and reduce disruption on the route, the Pelorus Bridge on State Highway 6 between Havelock and Rai Valley will  also be closed on the night of 23 February from 8 pm until 5.30 am to allow one of its deck panels to be replaced. The bridge will be open for traffic at 12:30 am.

    Road crews will be carrying out road resurfacing and other essential maintenance work including

    clearing drains, replacing a culvert, completing resilience improvements, and other general works.

    All the work has been deliberately timed to happen at night and outside peak summer holiday traffic to ensure it affects as few road users as possible.

    Full closures are being used because of narrowness of the road and the equipment being used. It is not feasible or safe for road users or workers to run stop/go traffic management. The closures will allow the work to be completed faster and with lower traffic management costs.

    The highway will be opened once per night at 12:30 am to let traffic through. Road users, particularly freight operators are urged to plan carefully to ensure they meet this schedule.

    Drivers also need to be aware of other state highway maintenance work planned for the region in February and March, and to check road conditions before they travel.

    Other State Highway maintenance works:

    • SH6 Havelock – Nighttime works: Asphalting
      • Tuesday, 11 February to Sunday, 6 March, 7 pm to 7 am. Stop/go with delays of up to 10 minutes.
    • SH6 Pelorus – Day time work: Area Wide Pavement Treatment
      • Monday, 10 February to Tuesday, 11 March, 7 am to 7 pm. Stop/go with delays of up to 10 minutes.

    SH6 Whangamoa Saddle – works schedule and location:

    • 23 February to 13 March. Sunday to Thursday nights, 8 pm – 5:30 am.
    • No work will be done on Friday and Saturday nights. The highway will be open, but traffic management and temporary speed limits will apply at work areas.
    • There will be one nightly opening of the road at 12:30 am to allow vehicles through. Drivers must be at the closure points (at the weighbridge in Hira, and on the Rai Valley straight at Rai Engineering & Mechanical) by 12:30 am.
    • Bad weather may see works delayed or extended.
    • There will be other areas of work on our state highways across the top of the South during February. Please plan ahead when travelling.

    SH6 Pelorus Bridge – works schedule and location:

    • Sunday 23 February, 8 pm – 5:30 am with one opening of the road at 12:30 am to allow vehicles to cross the bridge.
    • Drivers must be at the closure points at the Pelorus Bridge by 12:30 am.
    • Contractors will return to the site to complete maintenance work on SH6 Pelorus Bridge from 3 March to 6 March, 8 pm – 5:30 am. Expect delays of up to 10 minutes.
    • Bad weather may see works delayed or extended.
    • There will be other areas of work on our state highways across the top of the South during February. Please plan ahead when travelling.

    Detour Route:

    • The alternate route for drivers wanting to travel over night between Blenheim and Nelson is via State Highway 63 and St Arnaud.
    • This is a much longer route and will add to travel times.

    Works Location:

    View larger image [PDF, 598 KB]

    MIL OSI New Zealand News

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Funeral procession, Counties Manukau

    Source: New Zealand Police (District News)

    Please attribute to Senior Sergeant Simon Cornish, Counties Manukau East:

    Police are aware of plans for a funeral procession heading through Counties Manukau today.

    We will have staff in the area monitoring to ensure the safety of the community and to monitor traffic movement.

    Antisocial or unlawful behaviour and driving related offending will not be tolerated and any of this behaviour can expect to be met with enforcement action.

    Everyone in the community has the right to be safe and feel safe and we ask you report any unlawful behaviour to Police on 111 if it is happening now or 105 after the fact.

    ENDS.

    Holly McKay/NZ Police

    MIL OSI New Zealand News

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Sport and recreation facilities funding round opens

    Source: Auckland Council

    Indoor facilities, courts, changing rooms – these are just a few examples of the essential infrastructure needed to provide an optimal sport and recreation experience for Aucklanders.

    The sports organisations across Tāmaki Makaurau who want to develop their facilities can now apply for a slice of $9.5 million funding through Auckland Council’s Sport and Recreation Facilities Investment Fund (SRFIF).

    Councillor Angela Dalton, chair of the council’s Community Committee says the funding will lead to a boost in the number of Aucklanders participating in sport and recreation activities across the region.

    “Over the summer, we’ve seen Aucklanders at great facilities all over the region participating in their chosen sports, having fun and connecting – and this will continue with winter sports in the coming months.

    “The fund supports the development of sport and recreation facilities that create opportunities for Aucklanders to get active.

    Applications for the 2025/2026 Sport and Recreation Facilities Investment Fund open from 18 February 2025 to 18 March 2025.

    Kenneth Aiolupotea, General Manager Community Wellbeing welcomes applications to the fund.

    “Grassroots sports organisations play an important role in the Tāmaki Makaurau sport and recreation network.

    “Sports organisations that need help to finance building or infrastructure work are encouraged to apply through the fund.

    “A range of sports organisations, including football, rugby and league, bowls and kartsport received funding through the last

    contestable funding round.

    Who should apply? 

    The SRFIF is a contestable grant and open to non-council organisations for significant facility development. 

    It has a focus on communities that are in the greatest need of investment and large-scale community sport facility development projects that can leverage additional investment. 

    The guidelines that outline full eligibility and funding priorities are explained here.

    Key dates 

    The 2025/26 funding round will be open for applications between 18 February 2025 and 18 March 2025.

    Funding decisions will be made by the Community Committee in July 2025.

    More information on the council’s grants programme that supports Aucklanders’ aspirations for a great city, including the Sport and Recreation Facilities Investment Fund can be found on the Auckland Council website.

    MIL OSI New Zealand News

  • MIL-OSI Australia: How far would you trust AI to make important decisions?

    Source: University of South Australia

    18 February 2025

    Would you trust AI to choose your medical treatment?

    From tailored Netflix recommendations to personalised Facebook feeds, artificial intelligence (AI) adeptly serves content that matches our preferences and past behaviours. But while a restaurant tip or two is handy, how comfortable would you be if AI-algorithms were in charge of your medical expert or new hire?

    Now, a new study from the University of South Australia shows that most people are more likely to trust AI in situations where the stakes are low, such as music suggestions, but less likely to trust AI in high-stakes situations, such as medical decisions.

    However, those with poor statistical literacy or little familiarity with AI were just as likely to trust algorithms for trivial choices as they were for critical decisions.

    Assessing responses from nearly 2000 participants across 20 countries, researchers found that statistical literacy affects trust differently. People who understand that AI-algorithms work through pattern-based predictions (but also have risks and biases) were more sceptical of AI in high-stakes situations, but less so in low-stakes situations.

    They also found that older people and men were generally more cautious of algorithms, as were people in highly industrialised nations like Japan, the US, and the UK.

    Understanding how and when people trust AI-algorithms is essential, particularly as society continues to introduce and adopt machine-learning technologies.

    AI adoption rates have increased dramatically with 72% of organisations now using AI in their business.

    Lead author and human and artificial cognition expert, Dr Fernando Marmolejo-Ramos, says the speed at which smart technologies are being used to outsource decisions is outpacing our understanding to successfully integrate them into society.

    “Algorithms are becoming increasingly influential in our lives, impacting everything from minor choices about music or food, to major decisions about finances, healthcare, and even justice,” Dr Marmolejo-Ramos says.

    “But the use of algorithms to help make decisions implies that there should be some confidence in their reliability. That’s why it’s so important to understand what influences people’s trust in algorithmic decision-making.

    “Our research found that in low-stakes scenarios, such as restaurant recommendations or music selection, people with higher levels of statistical literacy were more likely to trust algorithms.

    “Yet, when the stakes were high, for things like health or employment, the opposite was true; those with better statistical understanding were less likely to place their faith in algorithms.”

    UniSA’s Dr Florence Gabriel says there should be a concentrated effort to promote statistical and AI literacy among the general population so that people can better judge when to trust algorithmic decisions.

    “An AI-generated algorithm is only as good as the data and coding that it’s based on,” Dr Gabriel says.

    “We only need to look at the recent banning of DeepSeek to grasp how algorithms can produce biased or risky data depending on the content that it was built upon.

    “On the flip side, when an algorithm has been developed through a trusted and transparent source, such as the custom-build EdChat chatbot for South Australian schools, it’s more easily trusted.

    “Learning these distinctions is important. People need to know more about how algorithms work, and we need to find ways to deliver this in clear, simple ways that are relevant to the user’s needs and concerns.

    “People care about what the algorithm does and how it affects them. We need clear, jargon-free explanations that align with the user’s concerns and context. That way we can help people to responsibly engage with AI.”

    …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

    Contacts for interview: Dr Florence Gabriel E: Florence.Gabriel@unisa.edu.au
    Dr Fernando Marmolejo-Ramos (now at Flinders University) E: fernando.marmolejoramos@flinders.edu.au
    Media contact:
    Annabel Mansfield M: +61 479 182 489 E: Annabel.Mansfield@unisa.edu.au

    Other articles you may be interested in

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-Evening Report: Is Australia’s GST a tax or a tariff? And why has it become a target in the trade wars?

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Felicity Deane, Professor, Queensland University of Technology

    Australian beef exports to the United States are GST-free and should not be subject to any retaliatory tariff. William Edge/Shutterstock

    The latest round of proposed tariffs from US President Donald Trump includes a response to what the White House describes as “unfair” taxes – specifically, value-added taxes such as Australia’s Goods and Services Tax (GST).

    Most economically advanced countries have a value-added tax (VAT) or sales tax on consumption. This applies to domestic goods and services as well as to imports. The United States is one of the few countries that does not impose a sales tax, though many of the states impose their own sales tax.

    So the argument, according to the White House, is these taxes apply to imported goods, but not to exports.

    Is the GST a tax or a tariff?

    The GST is a broad-based consumption tax of 10%. It applies to most goods and services that are consumed in Australia, regardless of their origin.

    An import tariff – sometimes called an import duty – is imposed exclusively on imported goods as a condition of market access.

    Tariffs are not imposed on domestically produced goods at all. This is the main point of difference with a domestic consumption tax. The GST applies equally to imported and domestically produced goods, adhering to long-agreed international trade rules.

    It remains unclear how the Trump administration intends to implement a tariff that is equivalent to the 10% GST. In effect, this becomes a tax on US consumers if they buy Australian goods.




    Read more:
    What’s a trade war?


    Such an indirect tax would be regressive, which means it falls more heavily on lower-income consumers. The expansion of tariffs to include other nations’ VAT systems also represents a significant overreach into national sovereignty. It has long been accepted that sovereign nations have the right to tax their citizens and businesses as they see fit.

    Indeed, Australia’s GST is among the lowest among economically advanced nations, for which the average is 19%, so the wider impact on US consumers will be even greater.

    Goods that are exported to the US face a new round of tariffs.
    Shutterstock

    Trump is clearly (and unapologetically) seeking to reinvigorate US manufacturing. But the reality is that US labour costs are high. It is also inefficient for any country to produce all the goods and services its population requires. This is particularly the case in such a high-consumption nation as the US.

    The US has been described as a consumer of last resort
    because strong consumer demand has been filled by ever rising imports from other countries. The mutually beneficial relationship between the US and China has enabled the rise of the middle class in China. Trump’s tariffs may shift this, causing geopolitical tensions and economic instability.

    Australia’s response: pausing the digital services tax

    While these tariffs primarily harm US consumers, Australian businesses will also feel the effects. However, it is unclear to what extent. Notably, one main export to the US, unprocessed agricultural products such as beef, are GST-free and should not be subject to any retaliatory tariff.

    However, many other Australian exports could be disadvantaged. Trump’s policies will raise the cost of Australian imported goods in the US market, potentially making them less appealing to US consumers.

    The threat of these tariffs is clearly a problem for a federal government facing an impending election, and Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has so far responded cautiously. While a diplomatic approach may secure a minor concession, it’s in stark contrast to Canada’s firm stance, which included immediate threats of retaliatory measures.




    Read more:
    Whether we carve out an exemption or not, Trump’s latest tariffs will still hit Australia


    Trump’s use of tariff threats as a negotiating tactic does appear to be having the desired effect, with a potential suspension of Australia’s proposed big tech levy. This proposal would have imposed a tax on major tech firms such as Meta and Google if they did not reach a direct agreement with local media companies.

    Reports indicate the government has put this proposal on hold due to the risk of retaliatory tariffs from the US. Such a tax would likely have invoked the wrath of the US administration, with the digital services levies of Canada and France specifically referenced in the most recent White House tariff announcement.

    It is fair to say the White House statement deliberately misleads any reader into thinking that tariff percentages directly impact on trade volumes.

    This statement ignores a fundamental principle that has made international trade so appealing since World War II – and why economists have argued in support of it for hundreds of years. Countries produce and trade the goods and services at which they are efficient. Efficiency leads to lower costs which, all else being equal, means consumers are better off.

    The statement from the White House, together with Trump’s past pronouncements, demonstrate that all rules to do with international taxation and fairness have been thrown out.

    This does not appear to be the main concern, however, with Australian negotiators potentially willing to put on hold a crucial policy to ensure the long-term viability of local journalism.

    This is just the beginning. Anyone who felt some comfort and safety in the strength of our own democracy should carefully consider the overreach that is occurring through these threats.

    Felicity Deane does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. Is Australia’s GST a tax or a tariff? And why has it become a target in the trade wars? – https://theconversation.com/is-australias-gst-a-tax-or-a-tariff-and-why-has-it-become-a-target-in-the-trade-wars-250041

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-Evening Report: Boys not only perform better in maths, they are also more confident about the subject than girls

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Sarah Buckley, Senior Research Fellow, Education Research, Policy and Development Division, Australian Council for Educational Research

    Michael Jung/ Shutterstock

    There is a persistent gender gap in Australian schools. Boys, on average, outperform girls in maths.

    We see this in national tests such as NAPLAN, as well as international assessments.

    New Australian Council for Educational Research analysis by my colleague Catherine Underwood shows how boys, on average, are also more confident and positive about maths than girls.

    What can parents do to help their children feel more confident about this core subject?




    Read more:
    Why are boys outperforming girls in maths?


    Boys outperform girls in maths

    An important measure of students’ maths performance is the OECD’s Programme for International Assessment (PISA) test. Run every three years, it measures 15-year-olds’ ability to apply their maths, science and reading knowledge to real-world situations.

    In 2022, 53% of Australian male students achieved the PISA national proficiency standard in maths, compared with 48% of female students. The gender gap on average scores was also greater in Australia than across the OECD.

    As part of PISA, students also completed a questionnaire about their attitudes to learning. ACER’s new analysis uses data from the questionnaire to look at Australian students’ confidence in maths and how this differs between girls and boys.

    Boys outperformed girls in maths skills in the most recent PISA test.
    Monkey Business Images/ Shutterstock

    Why is confidence so important?

    Research suggests students’ confidence has an impact on their academic performance.
    Researchers can call this “self-efficacy”, or the belief in your ability to successfully perform tasks and solve problems.

    Students with high mathematical self-efficacy embrace challenges, use effective problem-solving strategies, and persevere despite difficulties. Those with low self-efficacy may avoid tasks, experience anxiety, and ultimately underperform due to a lack of confidence in their maths abilities.

    We can see this in the 2022 PISA results. Girls in the top quarter on the self-rated “self-efficacy index” scored an average of 568 points on the PISA maths performance test, a staggering 147 points higher than the average for girls in the lowest quarter on the index.

    For boys, the benefit of confidence was even more pronounced. Those in the top quarter of the index scored 159 points on average higher in maths performance than those in the lowest quarter.

    Boys are more confident than girls

    The PISA questionnaire asked students how confident they felt about having to do a range of formal and applied maths tasks.

    Students showed similar levels of confidence solving formal maths tasks such as equations. But male students, on average, showed they were more confident than female students with applied mathematics tasks such as:

    • finding distances using a map

    • calculating a power consumption rate

    • calculating how much more expensive a computer would be after adding tax

    • calculating how many square metres of tiles are needed to cover a floor.



    What about attitude?

    The PISA data also shows Australian boys, on average, have more positive attitudes towards maths than girls.

    For example, in response to the statement “mathematics is easy for me” only 41% of female students agreed, compared with 55% of male students.

    In response to “mathematics is one of my favourite subjects”, 37% of female students agreed, compared with 49% of males.

    But in response to “I want to do well in my mathematics class”, 91% of female students agreed, compared to 92% of males.

    What can parents do at home to help?

    It is troubling that girls, on average, show consistently lower levels of confidence about maths tasks.

    This comes on top of other PISA questionnaire results that have shown in general (not just around maths) that a higher proportion of girls than boys say they feel nervous approaching exams.

    We want all students to have a positive relationship with maths, where they can appreciate maths skills are important in many aspects of their lives, and they’re willing to have a go to develop them.

    Recently, we collaborated with the Victorian Academy of Teaching and Leadership on resources for teachers, students and parents that focus on addressing maths anxiety.

    Research shows how we talk about maths at home is important in shaping students’ attitudes and persistence. Parents can help create a positive atmosphere around maths by:

    • dispelling “maths myths”, such as the idea maths ability is fixed and no amount of effort or practise can improve it

    • talking about how making mistakes is a normal part of learning

    • thinking about about how we forgive mistakes in other areas (such as sport, art or science): how can we treat maths mistakes in a similar way?

    • telling your child they have done a good job when they put effort into their maths learning.

    Parents can also help their children even if they don’t know the answers to maths problems. It’s perfectly fine to say, “I’m not sure how to do that one but who can we ask for help? Let’s talk to the teacher.”

    Modelling a “help-seeking” approach lets children know that it’s OK not to know the answer, the key is to persist and try.




    Read more:
    ‘Maths anxiety’ is a real thing. Here are 3 ways to help your child cope


    Sarah Buckley is an Honorary Senior Research Fellow in the Faculty of Education at the University of Melbourne and was on the academic advisory group for maths education app TownSquared. Sarah has worked on projects for ACER funded by the national and various state education departments and by ARC research grants.

    ref. Boys not only perform better in maths, they are also more confident about the subject than girls – https://theconversation.com/boys-not-only-perform-better-in-maths-they-are-also-more-confident-about-the-subject-than-girls-250022

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-Evening Report: Australian students just recorded the lowest civics scores since testing began. But young people do care about politics

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Philippa Collin, Professor, Institute for Culture and Society, Western Sydney University

    Australian school students’ civics knowledge is the lowest it has been since testing began 20 years ago, according to new national data.

    Results have fallen since the last assessment in 2019 and to the lowest levels since the national civics test began in 2004.

    This follows a federal parliamentary report earlier this month, calling for mandatory civics education in Australian schools (it is currently part of the curriculum but not compulsory). The report cited fears young people are “poorly equipped” to participate in Australian democracy.

    The latest results are certainly concerning. But as a researcher of the political lives of young people, I would caution against assuming young people “don’t care” about politics, or are unable to engage in it.

    We also need to think about how civics education can engage meaningfully with young people and meet their needs.

    What does the new report say?

    This report from the Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority is based on a national sample of Year 6 and Year 10 students, who are tested on their civics and citizenship skills. It includes knowledge of democratic principles, the Australian political system and related history.

    The test is supposed to run every three years, but the most recent one was delayed by COVID. In 2024:

    • 43% of Year 6 students attained the “proficient standard”, compared with 53% in 2019

    • 28% of Australian Year 10 students met the proficient standard, compared with 38% in 2019.



    Young people care about history and community

    Alongside their civics skills, students were also asked about their support for a range of “citizenship behaviours”. While these figures have dropped from previous years, they nevertheless indicate most students are engaged in civic issues.

    • 81% of Year 6 students and 75% of Year 10 students thought learning about Australa’s history was “very or quite” important

    • 77% of Year 6 students and 70% of Year 10 students thought participating in activities to benefit the local community was “very or quite” important

    • 85% of Year 6 students and 68% of Year 10 students thought taking part in activities to protect the environment was “very or quite important”.



    Young people are knowledgable and active

    My research with young Australians shows they are interested, knowledgeable and active on civic and political issues in many different ways.

    This includes getting involved in or creating their own organisations, campaigns and online content. The issues range from bullying to mental health, climate change and ending gender-based violence.

    My research also shows even children as young as six have views on how to address complex issues such as climate change.

    When provided with platforms that respect their views, young people show they can research, deliberate and problem-solve. Many have clear opinions on what makes for a good life for themselves, Australia and the world. Initiatives such as a children’s parliament can connect their views directly with those who govern.

    Young people don’t feel included

    But governments and other authorities are historically poor at meaningfully engaging with young people.

    In my work and other research, we continue to hear many students feel they don’t have a genuine voice in the community.

    For example, in the climate movement, young female activists have said they do not feel feel their views are taken seriously by decision-makers because they are under 18.

    This suggests children’s interest and confidence in democracy could be supported by giving them meaningful opportunities to participate before they can vote.

    For example, creating governance mechanisms that include and are accountable to young people on matters that affect them. This should extend to issues which will significantly impact them into the future, such as housing and tax.

    Technology and critical media literacy matter

    We also have to make sure students are supported to get good quality information about issues relevant to them. And that they have the skills and resources to navigate information online.

    Research suggests engagement with news and strong media literacy skills are linked to civic participation.

    Studies have also found many Australian children who have high interest in the news are also involved in social issues online. Research shows social media is a key source for this news (as opposed to traditional sources such as newspapers or television).

    At the same time, just 41% of children aged 8–16 are confident they can tell fake news stories from real ones (which is is similar to survey results for adults).

    We also know some students, particularly from lower socioeconomic backgrounds, lack access to the technology they need for their schooling and everyday lives.

    How can civics and citizenship knowledge be improved?

    The new data certainly indicates the current system for civics education is not working for Australian students.

    As we work to improve young people’s civics knowledge, research indicates any new approach in schools should be created in conjunction with young people themselves. If young people are given a say in how their civics education is designed, they will be more engaged and the lessons will be more effective, especially for students who face disadvantage.

    Other studies we have co-designed and co-researched with young people have resulted in recommendations to trust young people and give them responsibilities and real-world learning opportunities, outside of school. They prioritised self-efficacy (people’s belief they can can control events that affect their lives) and a sense of belonging.

    If civics education is going to be effective, it should acknowledge young people already have an interest and a stake in politics, focus on where they get their information, and involve them in how civics education is designed and delivered.

    We might then have a model for supporting civics and citizenship learning across the community and across people’s lives.

    Philippa Collin receives funding from the Australian Research Council, Google, batyr and NSW Health.

    ref. Australian students just recorded the lowest civics scores since testing began. But young people do care about politics – https://theconversation.com/australian-students-just-recorded-the-lowest-civics-scores-since-testing-began-but-young-people-do-care-about-politics-250047

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-Evening Report: With just 5 years to go, the world is failing on a vital deal to halt biodiversity loss

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Justine Bell-James, Professor, TC Beirne School of Law, The University of Queensland

    Almost 200 nations have signed an ambitious agreement to halt and reverse biodiversity loss but none is on track to meet the crucial goal, our new research reveals.

    The agreement, known formally as the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework, seeks to coordinate global efforts to conserve and restore biodiversity. Its overarching goal is to safeguard biodiversity for future generations.

    Biodiversity refers to the richness and variety within and between plant and animal species, and within ecosystems. This diversity is declining faster than at any time in human history.

    Five years remain until the framework’s 2030 deadline. Our research shows a more intense global effort is needed to achieve the goals of the agreement and stem the biodiversity crisis.

    Biodiversity is in decline

    Biodiversity decline is a growing global issue. Around one million animal and plant species are threatened with extinction.

    The problem is driven by human activities such as land clearing, climate change, pollution, excessive resource extraction and the introduction of invasive species.

    As biodiversity continues to degrade, the foundation of life on Earth becomes increasingly unstable. Biodiversity loss threatens our food, water and air. It increases our vulnerability to natural disasters and imperils ecosystems crucial for human survival and wellbeing.

    The Global Biodiversity Framework was adopted in late 2022 after four years of consultation and negotiation. It involved 23 core commitments to be met by 2030 involving both land and sea. Key to the deal is protecting areas from future harm, and restoring past harms.

    These aims are captured in two targets.

    The first is ensuring 30% of degraded areas are under “effective restoration” to enhance biodiversity. This could involve replanting vegetation, reducing weeds and other pests, or restoring water to drained areas.

    The second is to effectively conserve and manage 30% of land and sea areas – especially those important for biodiversity and the ways ecosystems function and benefit humans. This could mean creating national or marine parks, or nature refuges on private land.

    Importantly, countries should both increase the size of areas protected or under restoration (a matter of quantity), and choose areas where interventions will most benefit biodiversity (a matter of quality).

    Nations were asked to provide an action plan before October 2024. In a paper published today, we reviewed these plans.

    What we found

    Our findings were disappointing. Only 36 countries (less than one quarter of signatory nations) submitted a plan. Australia was one of them.

    And the plans provided were underwhelming. In particular, nations fell badly short on the restoration target. Only nine out of 36 countries committed to restoring a specific percentage of land and sea.

    For example, Italy pledged only to restore “large surfaces of degraded areas” and Australia committed to restoring “priority degraded areas”.

    Defining commitments with numbers is important, because it allows progress to be monitored and measured, and forces nations to be accountable.

    Of those nine countries that made specific restoration commitments, only six committed to the 30% goal: Aruba, China, Curaçao, Japan, Luxembourg and Uganda.

    The results were better when it came to protecting land and sea. Some 22 of the 36 countries set a percentage target for protection. However, only 14 committed to protecting at least 30% of areas, in line with the goals of the deal.

    Again, quality is also important here. Under the deal nations signed up to, protected land should enhance biodiversity, and cover areas very valuable for biodiversity recovery. However, many nations were silent on the issue of quality when outlining their planned protections. It means their efforts could, in some cases, do little for biodiversity.

    A spotlight on Australia

    In recent years, Australia has sought to establish itself as a biodiversity leader on the international stage. This included hosting the global Nature Positive Summit in October last year.

    Following the summit, the federal government claimed it was:

    a tangible demonstration of Australia’s commitments under the Kunming Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework. It showed our willingness to work collaboratively towards the goal of halting and reversing biodiversity loss.

    But despite the rhetoric, our research shows Australia’s plans are not particularly impressive.

    As noted above, Australia does not provide a percentage target for ecosystem restoration. Instead, its plan refers broadly to restoring “priority areas” without defining what these areas are.

    Australia’s plan pledges to identify “priority degraded areas” and define what “under effective restoration” means, but does not outline how this will be done.

    Australia is more aligned with global leaders on protection of biodiversity. It committed to safeguarding 30% of land and water in protected areas.

    However, it provided limited details on how it will select, implement and enforce protection measures. The plan also fails to recognise current shortcomings in protected areas, both in oceans and on land – in particular, Australia’s focus to date on quantity over quality when it comes to selecting sites.

    In contrast, the nation of Slovenia mapped out proposed protected areas.

    So, while Australia did submit an action plan, it has missed the opportunity to be a true global leader.

    Running out of time

    The Global Biodiversity Framework aims to unite nations in the fight to conserve and restore biodiversity. But as our research shows, many countries do not have plans to achieve this, and plans submitted to date are largely inadequate.

    As species and habitats are lost, ecosystems become less stable. This damages human health and wellbeing, as well as economies. Biodiversity loss also undermines vital cultural and spiritual connections to nature.

    All countries must accelerate efforts to avert the biodiversity crisis, and preserve Earth’s precious natural places for future generations.

    Justine Bell-James receives funding from the Australian Research Council, the National Environmental Science Program, and Queensland Government’s Department of Environment, Tourism, Science and Innovation. She is a Director of the National Environmental Law Association.

    James Watson has received funding from the Australian Research Council, National Environmental Science Program, South Australia’s Department of Environment and Water, Queensland’s Department of Environment, Science and Innovation as well as from Bush Heritage Australia, Queensland Conservation Council, Australian Conservation Foundation, The Wilderness Society and Birdlife Australia. He serves on the scientific committee of BirdLife Australia and has a long-term scientific relationship with Bush Heritage Australia and Wildlife Conservation Society. He serves on the Queensland government’s Land Restoration Fund’s Investment Panel as the Deputy Chair.

    ref. With just 5 years to go, the world is failing on a vital deal to halt biodiversity loss – https://theconversation.com/with-just-5-years-to-go-the-world-is-failing-on-a-vital-deal-to-halt-biodiversity-loss-249841

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-Evening Report: Australians are waiting 12 years on average before seeking help for a mental health problem – new research

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Louise Birrell, Researcher, Matilda Centre for Research in Mental Health and Substance Use, University of Sydney

    Pixel-Shot/Shutterstock

    Australians are waiting an average of 12 years to seek treatment for mental health and substance use disorders, our new research shows.

    While many of us are proactive in looking after our physical health, we appear to be seriously neglecting our mental health, suffering for many years before reaching out for help. Some people never seek help.

    In our research, the length of delay in seeking help varied depending on the type of mental health problem and other factors such as sex and age.

    But delays in getting help mean mental health problems can become more complex, severe and difficult to treat. So it’s important to understand why these delays occur – and how we can reduce them.

    Some key findings

    We used national data from the 2020–22 Australian National Study of Mental Health and Wellbeing, a nationally representative survey by the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS).

    Among the information collected in this survey, respondents were asked about their history of mental health and substance use problems, and when they first sought help from a medical doctor or other professional regarding their symptoms (if at all).

    The survey asked about the most common types of mental health and substance use problems in the general population under three broad categories: mood disorders (for example, depression and bipolar disorder), anxiety disorders (such as social anxiety disorder and obsessive compulsive disorder) and substance use disorders.

    People with mood disorders waited an average of three years before seeking treatment, those with substance use disorders waited an average of eight, and people with anxiety disorders waited the longest to seek treatment – 11 years on average.

    We found people experiencing panic disorder, a type of anxiety disorder, had some of the shortest delays (an average of two years), while those with social anxiety disorder waited the longest (13 years).

    The average delay across all mental health and substance use disorders – 12 years – was calculated based on the prevalence of different conditions. Anxiety disorders, particularly social anxiety disorder, are the most common, which brought up this average.

    We found younger people were more likely to seek help.
    Perfect Wave/Shutterstock

    We also looked at how many people would eventually seek help across their lifetime. Nearly everyone with depression (94%) eventually sought help, but only 25% of people with an alcohol use disorder ever did.

    Women were less likely than men to seek help for alcohol or other drug-related problems but were more likely to reach out for help with anxiety or mood-related concerns.

    Gen Z and millennials were much more likely to seek help than older generations. Compared to people born before 1972, those born between 1992 and 2005 were more than four times as likely to seek treatment for a drug or alcohol problem, more than twice as likely to seek help for a mood disorder, and nearly four times as likely to seek help for an anxiety problem.

    Some limitations

    While the ABS survey is one of the largest and most comprehensive in Australia, it relies on people remembering and accurately reporting when they first experienced symptoms of a mental health or substance use problem, and when they first sought support.

    It was also conducted during the COVID pandemic, a time of heightened stress and increased mental health challenges. However, the impact of this is probably small, given people were asked about their experiences across their entire lifetime.

    The survey also didn’t measure less common (but very impactful) mental health problems such as psychosis or eating disorders.

    How do delays compare to other countries?

    While this data is not perfect, the delays we observed are mostly in line with those seen in other countries. In some ways we are actually doing better.

    The relatively short delays for seeking help for a mood disorder (for example, depression, for which the average delay was three years) are largely consistent with similar studies in the United States, New Zealand, Europe and Asia.

    It’s often several years between when someone first experiences a mental health problem and when they seek treatment.
    Erik Mclean/Unsplash

    While still lengthy, the average delay of 11 years to seek treatment for an anxiety disorder in Australia appears similar if not shorter than in many other countries (ranging between 10–30 years).

    What’s more, when it comes to seeking help for problems with alcohol, things seem to be improving. While overall delays remain long, and most people still don’t seek help for alcohol problems, the delay in getting help appears to have shortened over time in Australia.

    The average time to seek treatment for alcohol use disorder is now eight years shorter than the 18-year delay reported in 2007. This may be due to increased awareness and education around the impact of alcohol use.

    Why do people delay reaching out for help?

    There are a range of reasons someone may delay seeking help. Services are not always available and many carry high out-of-pocket costs. Fear and stigma play a significant role, while many people simply may not know where to seek support or what might help.

    Finding the right treatment can be hard and while some people recover without help, for many these delays come at a huge cost. Delays mean problems can become more complex, severe and difficult to treat.

    We need to actively encourage early help-seeking, as well as continue efforts to reduce the stigma associated with poor mental health. Expanding anti-stigma campaigns and education to encourage people to seek help early could assist with this.

    Alongside these efforts it’s essential that effective treatment services are accessible when people do reach out for help. There has been chronic underinvestment in the mental health treatment system over many decades, while prevalence rates have increased. We need continued and increased investment in mental health treatment, prevention and early intervention.

    Ultimately, by empowering future generations to be proactive about their mental health, we hope we can make going to the doctor for anxiety as normal as doing so for the flu.

    Services available across Australia include the National Alcohol and Other Drug hotline (1800 250 015), Lifeline (13 11 14), Kids Helpline (1800 55 1800) and Head to Health. Each state and territory also has specialised mental health services.

    Louise Birrell receives funding from The National Health and Medical Research Council and The Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing.

    Cath Chapman receives funding from The National Health and Medical Research Council and The Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing.

    Katrina Prior receives funding from the National Health and Medical Research Council.

    ref. Australians are waiting 12 years on average before seeking help for a mental health problem – new research – https://theconversation.com/australians-are-waiting-12-years-on-average-before-seeking-help-for-a-mental-health-problem-new-research-249159

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-Evening Report: Should you be allowed to sue a judge? The High Court says no

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Stephen Parker, Honorary Professorial Fellow, Melbourne CSHE, The University of Melbourne

    Shutterstock

    Judges in Australian courtrooms have a lot of power. They can decide on someone’s guilt and the punishment for it, including lengthy prison time.

    But what if they get it badly wrong? Should you be able to sue a judge for damages?

    For several centuries the answer has been no in a “superior” court, such as a state Supreme Court, but possibly yes in an “inferior” court, such as a magistrates, district or county court, where most cases are actually heard.

    The High Court of Australia has now ruled that judges are immune from being sued for damages in every court and for all purposes. It is absolute, even if you have been falsely imprisoned.

    But how did this decision come to be, and what does it mean for fair judicial processes?

    The High Court case

    The story behind the ruling began with a legal property dispute between a couple called the Stradfords.

    Judge Salvatore Vasta in the Federal Circuit Court ordered that Mr Stradford should make “full and frank disclosure” of various financial documents. Mrs Stradford complained repeatedly that the disclosure was not complete.

    Judge Vasta adjourned proceedings briefly to allow them to discuss settlement. To give Mr Stradford something to think about, he said he hoped Mr Stradford had brought his toothbrush with him.

    Later that day, Judge Vasta sentenced Mr Stradford to 12 months’ imprisonment for contempt of court in disobeying the disclosure order. Judge Vasta mistakenly assumed a previous judge had already decided Mr Stradford was in contempt.

    Mr Stradford appealed the contempt conviction in the Full Court of the Family Court. It allowed the appeal, concluding “the processes employed [by Judge Vasta] were so devoid of procedural fairness […] and the reasons for judgment so lacking in engagement with the issues of fact and law to be applied” that it would be an “affront to justice” to permit the contempt declaration and the imprisonment order to stand.

    Armed with this finding, Mr Stradford sued Judge Vasta for damages for false imprisonment and won. Judge Vasta then appealed to the High Court, arguing that he was immune from being sued. In its ruling last week, the High Court agreed with him.

    Why can’t judges be sued?

    Immunity from being sued helps protect judicial independence, said the High Court.

    If, at the back of their mind, a judge thinks they might be sued for damages should they make a wrong decision, they might be swayed by that, rather than objectively and impartially applying the law to the facts.

    Immunity also helps to achieve finality in court proceedings and “quell disputes”. Finality is a consideration in all legal systems, and is the reason why some claims are time-barred if not brought within a specified period. You don’t want the same cases dragging on forever.

    The High Court noted that a disappointed litigant can appeal against a decision, but once all appeal avenues have been exhausted, that is that.

    The High Court has ruled judges can’t be sued for their decisions.
    Shutterstock

    If a judge has committed a crime, such as accepting a bribe, then the criminal law can be applied.

    But in the more likely case where the unsuccessful party argues there has been a mistake, or even that the judge was motivated by bias or malice, the only recourse is to appeal. They can’t sue the judge.

    The High Court noted also that a judge can be removed by parliament for misbehaviour or incapacity.

    But there are counter-arguments to which the court didn’t give much attention.

    For those who feel the outcome was wrong, appealing against a decision is very expensive. It’s simply not open to most people, due to the near-disappearance of legal aid in civil cases.

    And the removal of judges by parliaments is extremely rare, while not helping the litigant anyway.

    Is this good public policy?

    In other walks of professional life, indemnity insurance exists. If judges could be sued, but were insured, they would normally not pay compensation personally. And if they could not find insurance, perhaps something needs investigating.

    A compromise position would be possible. Any legal action against a judge could have to exceed a certain threshold of severity to proceed.

    For example, a plaintiff might have to obtain prior permission, and for that they might have to prove malice on the part of the judge or an error so extreme that the judge had been reckless, not merely negligent.

    But courts are different, it seems. Litigants do not make a contract with courts and are not consumers of a court’s services. They are engaging in a public process, where bigger issues are in play.

    The public policy arguments so resoundingly endorsed by the High Court aren’t based on data about what the public thinks, or would necessarily think if all the arguments were presented to them.

    None of this has improved Mr (or Mrs) Stradford’s financial position. No one is going to compensate them.

    Courts are, in a very real sense, a law unto themselves.

    Stephen Parker does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. Should you be allowed to sue a judge? The High Court says no – https://theconversation.com/should-you-be-allowed-to-sue-a-judge-the-high-court-says-no-249939

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-OSI United Nations: Committee on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women Holds Half-Day General Discussion on Gender Stereotypes

    Source: United Nations – Geneva

    The Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women today held a half-day general discussion on its proposed general recommendation on gender stereotypes.

    In opening remarks, Nahla Haidar, Committee Chairperson, said gender stereotypes created false beliefs, inhibitive gender roles and discrimination. The Committee hoped to prepare guidelines that would help States to address these stereotypes, and counter myths and common excuses as to why gender stereotypes continued to be perpetuated, such as cultural and religious reasons.

    Peggy Hicks, Director, Thematic Engagement, Special Procedures and Right to Development Division, United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, said in introductory remarks that the general recommendation would provide guidance on State obligations to address gender stereotypes as root causes of gender-based discrimination.  She expressed hope that it would strengthen standards, principles and guidance to eliminate all forms of gender stereotypes.

    In her introductory remarks, Natalia Kanem, Executive Director, United Nations Population Fund, said that currently, around the world, there were immense pushbacks against women and girls in all their diversity.  In this uncertain moment, all parties needed to stand with women and engage actively in developing this general recommendation.  The work of the Committee saved and transformed lives; it needed to continue.

    Nyaradzayi Gumbonzvanda, Deputy Executive Director, United Nations Women, said gender stereotypes were barriers to the human rights of women and girls.  They restricted education, jobs, leadership, health and justice, fuelling inequality and violence, silencing women and denying freedoms.  General recommendation 41 presented a decisive opportunity to dismantle gender stereotypes at their core.

    Bandana Rana and Rhoda Reddock, Committee Experts and Co-Chairs of the Committee Working Group on gender stereotypes, also made introductory statements, calling on all stakeholders to support and provide input for the general recommendation.

    After the introductory remarks, the Committee held a panel discussion on gender stereotypes, hearing presentations from Adriana Quinones, Head, Human Rights and Development, United Nations Women; Joni van de Sand, Global MenEngage Alliance; Paola Daher, Women Deliver; Alexandra Xanthaki, United Nations Special Rapporteur in the field of cultural rights; and Marwa Sharafeldin, Musawah.

    Following the panel discussion, States parties, United Nations agencies, and civil society representatives delivered oral statements. Speaking were Malta, Andorra, Poland, Canada, Vanuatu, Cyprus, Japan, Chile, Maldives, Ukraine, Austria, Azerbaijan, United Arab Emirates, Mexico, Bulgaria, Israel, Venezuela, Bolivia, Spain, United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization and Nepal.

    Also speaking were Consortium for Intersectional Justice, Observatorio Iberoamericano Contra la Violencia de Género, Duch Cedaw Network, WILPF, Center for Reproductive Rights, European Network of Migrant Women, Tania Sordo Ruz, Nordic Model Now, and Ilga World.

    The Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women’s ninetieth session is being held from 3 to 21 February.  All documents relating to the Committee’s work, including reports submitted by States parties, can be found on the session’s webpage.  Meeting summary releases can be found here.  The webcast of the Committee’s public meetings can be accessed via the UN Web TV webpage.

    The Committee will next meet at 5 p.m. on Friday, 21 February to close its ninetieth session.

    Introductory Remarks

    NAHLA HAIDAR, Committee Chair, welcomed all participants to the meeting.  She said that the Committee was mandated to issue recommendations to States parties and provide guidance on themes related to women’s rights.  The discussions to be held today would focus on the Committee’s proposed general recommendation on general stereotypes, which the Committee urged all stakeholders to support.  Gender stereotypes created false beliefs, inhibitive gender roles and discrimination.  Measures needed to be implemented to combat them.  The Committee hoped to prepare guidelines that would help States to address these stereotypes, and counter myths and common excuses as to why gender stereotypes continued to be perpetuated, such as cultural and religious reasons.

    PEGGY HICKS, Director, Thematic Engagement, Special Procedures and Right to Development Division, United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, said she could not think of a timelier topic.  The general recommendation on gender stereotypes would provide guidance on State obligations to address these stereotypes as root causes of gender-based discrimination.  She expressed hope that it would strengthen standards, principles and guidance to eliminate all forms of gender stereotypes.

    Gender stereotypes were justified under the banners of “tradition,” “culture,” “religion” or even “nature.”  They often stemmed from patriarchal systems that tolerated or affirmed unequal power relations, based on the idea that women were inferior to men.  Discriminatory practices against women and girls needed to be eliminated, regardless of their origins, including those perpetuated in the name of culture or religion.

    The impacts of gender stereotyping began in the family and were apparent in every aspect of the lives of women and girls.  Gender stereotyping normalised violence against women and girls, politicised their reproductive functions, and denied them equal participation in political life and economic opportunities.  Women who did not conform to gender stereotypes or who openly contested them were particularly exposed to discrimination, violence and criminalisation.  

    It was crucial to address stereotypes that manifested first in the family and were then perpetuated in education systems and all aspects of society, including virtual spaces.  Transforming education systems to eliminate gender stereotypes was essential; human rights-based education was a powerful tool to dispel stereotypes.

    The discussion would address the unique vulnerabilities faced by women and girls who experienced combined stereotypes based on gender and other grounds, such as ethnicity, socioeconomic status, disability and age.  The general recommendation needed to address how to rectify the impact of intersecting forms of stereotypes, resulting discriminations and corresponding State obligations.

    Gender stereotypes trapped men and boys, conditioning them to embrace harmful ideas of masculinity.  Men and boys needed to challenge unequal power relations and structures, recognising how patriarchy privileged them and how gender equality liberated all.  Combatting gender stereotypes demanded a comprehensive approach involving the transformation of laws, policies and societal structures.  

    The general recommendation would enable States parties to change and transform gender stereotypes, paving the way for the full realisation of all human rights for all women and girls.  The Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights was ready to support this work.  It had concrete analytical tools and the mandate and expertise to monitor these issues, provide technical assistance, and build the capacity of key stakeholders.

    NATALIA KANEM, Executive Director, United Nations Population Fund, said it was currently a moment of grave import for the rights of women and girls. Around the world, there were immense pushbacks against women and girls in all their diversity.  Fierce opposition was threatening progress on several fronts.  It was welcome that maternal mortality had dropped by a third, and more than 160 countries had passed laws to address domestic violence. 

    However, the United Nations Population Fund regularly heard stories like those of Amena’s, who had been informed at age 13 by her parents that she was to be married.  The Fund had helped Amena to stand up for her rights and she was able to return to school.

    Gender stereotypes perpetuated stigma and shame around girls’ sexuality, and they posed significant risks to economic and social stability, contributing to the gender wage gap. Poverty often wore the face of a woman. Stereotypes also often led to gender-based violence, particularly online.  Discrimination severely limited the participation of women and girls in the digital space.  The ripple effects of these stereotypes drove political polarisation, fractured communities and exacerbated inequality.  They contributed to a world where progress and peace were illusive. 

    Gender discrimination was compounded by factors such as age, race and disability status.  The Fund was training healthcare workers to provide non-judgemental care for women, so women could make informed choices about their bodies and lives.

    Gender stereotypes were perpetuated in all segments of society.  The Fund was empowering girls to become leaders and was working to create a digital world that was safe and accessible for everyone.  It was also working with boys and men to ensure that they were not trapped by gender stereotypes.  It would continue to support policies and programmes that aimed to address harmful social norms.  The Committee needed to formulate processes that would give women their own money, self-agency and bodily autonomy.

    In this uncertain moment, all parties needed to stand with women.  All stakeholders needed to engage actively in developing this general recommendation.  This was not the time to roll back the clock on women’s rights.  The work of the Committee saved and transformed lives. It needed to continue.

    NYARADZAYI GUMBONZVANDA, Deputy Executive Director, United Nations Women, said United Nations Women was proud to support general recommendation 41.  Gender stereotypes were barriers to the human rights of women and girls.  They restricted education, jobs, leadership, health and justice, fuelling inequality and violence, silencing women and denying freedoms.  

    Gender stereotypes’ impact was clear in politics, where women faced double standards, exclusion and relentless scrutiny.  They also fuelled violence and impunity, with women and girls too often being valued first as wives and daughters, and not as full human beings with rights.  Stereotypes further dictated economic power, with women being denied inheritance rights.

    United Nations Women commended its Member States for adopting strong regional frameworks to combat gender-based violence and discrimination, including the Belem do Para Convention, the Istanbul Convention, and the African Union Convention on Ending Violence against Women.  Commitments needed to translate into action.  Lifting reservations to the Convention, which weakened protections and kept barriers in place, was urgent.

    General recommendation 41 presented a decisive opportunity to dismantle gender stereotypes at their core.  The year 2025 marked 30 years since the Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action.  It was also the final stretch toward the expiration date of the Sustainable Development Goals, which pledged to end harmful practices against women and girls. General recommendation 41 was a critical tool for transformation that needed to be acted on immediately.

    BANDANA RANA, Committee Expert and Co-Chair of the Committee Working Group on Gender Stereotypes, said the Committee, at its eighty-fourth session, had agreed to start the elaboration of a general recommendation on gender stereotypes.  Harmful gender stereotypes were one of the biggest stumbling blocks to gender equality.  They contributed to unequal representation in workplaces and policies, and contributed to gender-based violence. 

    The Convention called on States to challenge traditional norms that limited women’s’ representation in all areas of society.  The general recommendation would dismantle discriminatory stereotypes and provide guidance on addressing these stereotypes and creating a more just society.  Together, they could create more equitable societies, as envisioned by the Sustainable Development Goals.  Ms. Rana called on all stakeholders to actively contribute to the general recommendation, dismantle gender stereotypes, and build a future where everyone could thrive without barriers.

    RHODA REDDOCK, Committee Expert and Co-Chair of the Committee Working Group on Gender Stereotypes, said gender stereotypes were based on ideas, attitudes, belief systems and patriarchal structures that existed in all societies.  They reflected the notion of women being inferior to men. The Convention called on all States parties to modify social patterns and cultural practices that were based on stereotyped roles of men and women.  Stereotypes often changed, and new ones were regularly created.  Women’s structured inferiority moved with them to all activities where they predominated.  This issue was central to the equal valuing of women and men.  Ms. Reddock called on all stakeholders for support as the Committee developed the general recommendation.

    Summary of Statements by Panellists

    After the introductory remarks, the Committee held a panel discussion on gender stereotypes, hearing presentations from Adriana Quinones, Head, Human Rights and Development, United Nations Women; Joni van de Sand, Global MenEngage Alliance; Paola Daher, Women Deliver; Alexandra Xanthaki, United Nations Special Rapporteur in the field of cultural rights; and Marwa Sharafeldin, Musawah.

    Many speakers expressed concern that currently, women’s rights were under threat from those with immense power.  There was a mounting backlash against diversity, inclusion and lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and intersex rights, and new policies and platforms for discrimination were emerging.  Stereotypes between men and women were becoming more apparent and legitimised.

    Speakers said gender stereotypes were key pillars of patriarchal domination and power. They did not emerge in a vacuum; they were used to determine roles and behaviours that conformed to power relations, and they became stubbornly resistant over time.  They had a negative impact on the full realisation of the rights of women and girls, including their rights to work, education, and sexual and reproductive health.  Persons who challenged traditional notions of the family faced discrimination.  Gender stereotypes often intersected with stereotypes related to race, class and other aspects. 

    Speakers expressed national measures implemented to address gender stereotypes and promote gender mainstreaming, and offered the Committee support in addressing gender stereotypes.

    One speaker said an increasing number of young men in the world thought that gender equality had gone too far.  Transforming stereotypes against men was crucial in advancing gender equality.  A key strategy in this regard was to promote masculinity rooted in concepts of care and environmental protection, they said. The general recommendation needed to elaborate on how transforming gender stereotypes was relevant to men and masculinities.

    Another speaker said the Committee needed to recognise that stereotypes were not perpetuated by the abstract concept of “culture”.  The general recommendation needed to recognise that women’s rights and agency came from culture.  The general recommendation needed to recognise that it was how culture was being used by elites that made it harmful. 

    The rights enshrined in the Convention belonged to all women, including lesbian, bisexual, transgender and intersex women, one speaker said.  Womanhood needed to be recognised through self-identification.  The Committee needed to continue to eradicate stereotypes in international law regarding the definition of a woman.

    One speaker said that religion, law and the family were fields where transformative change was possible to dismantle gender stereotypes.  Religion was a source of law and it affected social norms and stereotypes.  There was patriarchal religious discourse and religious discourse that promoted gender equality.  States needed to make a choice about the religious discourse used in law and practice. The speaker noted efforts to combat gender stereotypes by changing interpretations of religious texts. 

    Several speakers gave recommendations regarding the content of the general recommendation.  One speaker said it needed to have a multi-layered institutional approach that was cognisant of power relations, while another called for the general recommendation’s scope to be expanded to promote counter narratives to gender stereotypes.  Another recommendation was for full effective and meaningful participation of women and girls to be captured in the general recommendation.

    Panel Discussion

    Representatives of States, United Nations agencies and civil society then took the floor, with speakers, among other things, expressing support for the elaboration of a general recommendation on gender stereotypes that would contribute to eliminating gender stereotypes and their adverse effects on women and girls, and to promoting the rights of all women and girls.

    Many speakers said gender stereotypes impeded the participation of women in all areas of public and private life and subconsciously affected how all behaved.  Stereotypes led to the subordination of women and girls, wage gaps, discrimination and gender-based violence.  They limited the potential of women globally and progress toward Sustainable Development Goal Five.  Women and girls continued to bear the brunt of conflict and climate change.  States had a responsibility to combat these stereotypes.

    Speakers said that in many countries, there was a pushback against feminism, which was misinforming the public and slowing progress. It was imperative to prevent backsliding.  In this context, the United Nations and other international bodies needed to expand, not restrict, definitions of gender, one speaker said.

    Some speakers said that in the digital world, harmful messaging and sexist discourse were affecting women and girls.  Online pornography and prostitution promoted violence against women and perpetuated stereotypes, while online hate speech reinforced gender stereotypes, silenced women’s voices, and limited their political participation.  The Committee needed to examine how gender stereotypes permeated online discourse. Some speakers said that artificial intelligence was perpetuating and amplifying harmful gender stereotypes against women.  Measures needed to be implemented to eliminate gender biases in artificial intelligence.  One speaker called for the promotion of women’s participation in the technological sector.

    Speakers expressed support for the elimination of all harmful stereotypes against women and girls.  All parties needed to cooperate to build a fair and equitable society for women and girls.  Governments needed to recognise the crucial role of civil society organizations in protecting women’s rights and countering stereotypes.  Stereotypes needed to be recognised and countered.  Stakeholders needed to reshape restrictive masculinities and reinforce positive gender norms.  International regional frameworks, including the Convention, needed to be implemented to build a more prosperous future for all.  Encouraging social awareness of stereotypes was crucial in combatting discrimination and promoting equality.

    Some speakers said gender stereotypes were cross-cutting, affecting various marginalised groups.  Intersectionality was a necessary lens for addressing gender stereotypes.  Speakers also called on the Committee to adopt a decolonial approach and embrace indigenous approaches to women’s rights, and consider the rights of lesbian, bisexual, transgender and intersex women and girls.  One speaker said the Committee needed to oppose the patriarchy and contribute to dismantling it.

    The Committee needed to elaborate on biases in gender-based roles and their impact on society, one speaker said.  Another speaker called for the general recommendation to consider the link between stereotypes and women’s unpaid care work. The Committee needed to note the importance of awareness raising campaigns in breaking down stereotypes. One speaker said the general recommendation needed to challenge how gender stereotypes influenced security systems.

    Some speakers said the general recommendation needed to consider the cultural sensitivities of all States parties. Actions and decisions needed to align with States’ unique customs, they said.  One speaker called on the Committee to reflect on the positive influences of culture and religion on promoting women’s rights.

    Speakers presented legislative and policy initiatives to counter gender stereotypes and address intersectional discrimination; promote women’s participation in the workforce, political bodies and education, including in science, technology, engineering and maths education; revise textbooks to remove gender stereotypes; promote the access of women and girls to health and reproductive rights; combat human trafficking; repeal discriminatory laws; collect data on the prevalence of gender discrimination; promote the use of parental leave and the participation of men in care work; and empower vulnerable women.

    One speaker asked the Committee whether the general recommendation would consider the connection between unilateral coercive measures and gender stereotypes.

    Closing Remarks

    ANTTI KORKEAKIVI, Chief, Human Rights Treaties Branch, United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, expressed gratitude to all speakers for their invaluable contributions.  The dialogue had demonstrated how deeply gender stereotypes affected women and girls in all aspects of life.  The general recommendation had the potential to dismantle gender stereotypes and help women and girls to realise their potential.  The inputs of all stakeholders would inform the Committee’s efforts to elaborate the general recommendation.  The Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights looked forward to the positive impact that the general recommendation would have on the lives of women and girls globally.

    NAHLA HAIDAR, Committee Chair, said all stakeholders’ inputs had been very valuable.  This general recommendation needed to ensure that no one was excluded from protection. The Committee would consider the Convention’s perspective on intersectionality, which was captured in the Committee’s general recommendation 28.  The current general recommendation needed to meet the requirements of women and girls all over the world.  Speakers had expressed a diversity of views on the subject, and the Committee would consider all these views.  In closing, Ms. Haidar thanked all speakers that had participated in the meeting, including more than 40 States parties.

    ___________

    CEDAW.25.052E

    Produced by the United Nations Information Service in Geneva for use of the information media; not an official record.

    English and French versions of our releases are different as they are the product of two separate coverage teams that work independently.

    MIL OSI United Nations News

  • MIL-OSI United Nations: Thailand Business News

    Source: UNISDR Disaster Risk Reduction

    Mission

    Thailand Business News is a comprehensive news service about Thailand with a business and financial perspective edited in Bangkok by Siam News Network.

    Thailand Business News provides reliable and timely information on the Thai economy, markets, and business sectors. Its mission is to help investors, entrepreneurs, and policymakers make informed decisions and stay updated on the latest trends and opportunities in Thailand.

    MIL OSI United Nations News

  • MIL-OSI Security: Recycling old Radium into Cancer Drugs

    Source: International Atomic Energy Agency – IAEA

    An IAEA expert mission was deployed to Suva, Fiji, to support the recovery and transportation of radium-226 to the USA, where the sources will be used as a feedstock to produce actinium-225, an alpha-emitting isotope which is increasingly used in targeted cancer treatments. IAEA supports countries in managing legacy radium-226 sources under the IAEA’s Global Radium Management Initiative.

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Economics: WTO and OECD release expanded dataset on trade in services covering over 200 economies

    Source: World Trade Organization

    The data on regional trade flows of digitally deliverable services shows that, in Europe, 62% of these exports were to economies within the region (see Chart 1). In contrast, North America exported 82% of its digitally deliverable services to economies outside the region. Regions such as the Middle East, South and Central America and the Caribbean, and Africa likewise focused on external markets.

    Chart 1: Regional exports of digitally deliverable services by destination, 2023
    % share based on balanced values

    Source: WTO estimates (2025). Balanced Trade in Services dataset (BaTIS) in the WTO Global Services Trade Data Hub.

    * CIS refers to the Commonwealth of Independent States, including certain associate and former member states.

    Note: Digitally deliverable services in the chart include financial and insurance services, telecommunications, computer and information services, other business services, charges for the use of intellectual property n.i.e., services, as well as personal, cultural and recreational services, such as audiovisual services.

    An in-depth analysis of digitally deliverable services further shows that the share of Africa’s exports of computer services to Europe rose from 47.6% in 2019 to 51.4% in 2023. Increased regionalization was observed in Asia as well as in North America and in South and Central America and the Caribbean, but it was less pronounced, over the same period.

    Chart 2: Computer services exports by origin and destination, 2023
    % shares based on balanced values

    1 CIS refers to the Commonwealth of Independent States, including certain associate and former member states.
    2 Includes the Caribbean.
    Source WTO estimates (2025). Balanced Trade in Services dataset (BaTIS) in the WTO Global Services Trade Data Hub.

    BaTIS data also sheds light on exports of “other business services,” including diverse professional, management, and technical services, from groups such as Small, Vulnerable Economies (SVEs). In 2023, SVE exports reached primarily major markets such as the United States (14%), the United Kingdom (12%) and Japan (8%) among others.

    Chart 3: Small and Vulnerable Economies (SVEs) exports of “Other business services” by destination, 2023
    % share based on balanced values

    Source: WTO estimates (2025). Balanced Trade in Services dataset (BaTIS) in the WTO Global Services Trade Data Hub.

    The BaTIS dataset, available for download, contains (i) reported bilateral data by economies, (ii) reported data including adjustments and estimates to fill data gaps, and (iii) the final balanced values to reconcile asymmetrical exports and imports.

    Share

    MIL OSI Economics

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: Meta’s new content policies risk fueling more mass violence and genocide 

    Source: Amnesty International –

    By Pat de Brún, Head of Big Tech Accountability at Amnesty International and Maung Sawyeddollah, the founder and Executive Director of the Rohingya Students’ Network.

    Recent content policy announcements by Meta pose a grave threat to vulnerable communities globally and drastically increase the risk that the company will yet again contribute to mass violence and gross human rights abuses – just like it did in Myanmar in 2017. The company’s significant contribution to the atrocities suffered by the Rohingya people is the subject of a new whistleblower complaint that has just been filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). 

    On January 7, founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg announced a raft of changes to Meta’s content policies, seemingly aimed at currying favor with the new Trump administration. These include the lifting of prohibitions on previously banned speech, such as the denigration and harassment of racialized minorities. Zuckerberg also announced a drastic shift in content moderation practices – with automated content moderation being significantly rolled back. While these changes have been initially implemented in the US, Meta has signaled that they may be rolled out internationally. This shift marks a clear retreat from the company’s previously stated commitments to responsible content governance. 

    “I really think this is a precursor for genocide […] We’ve seen it happen. Real people’s lives are actually going to be endangered.

    A former Meta employee recently speaking to the platformer

    As has been well-documented by Amnesty International and others, Meta’s algorithms prioritize and amplify some of the most harmful content, including advocacy of hatred, misinformation, and content inciting racial violence – all in the name of maximizing ‘user engagement,’ and by extension, profit. Research has shown that these algorithms consistently elevate content that generates strong emotional reactions, often at the cost of human rights and safety. With the removal of existing content safeguards, this situation looks set to go from bad to worse. 

    As one former Meta employee recently told Platformer, “I really think this is a precursor for genocide […] We’ve seen it happen. Real people’s lives are actually going to be endangered.” This statement echoes the warnings from various human rights experts who have raised concerns about Meta’s role in fuelling mass violence in fragile and conflict-affected societies. 

    We have seen the horrific consequences of Meta’s recklessness before. In 2017, Myanmar security forces undertook a brutal campaign of ethnic cleansing against Rohingya Muslims. A UN Independent Fact-Finding Commission concluded in 2018 that Myanmar had committed genocide. In the years leading up to these attacks, Facebook had become an echo chamber of virulent anti-Rohingya hatred. The mass dissemination of dehumanizing anti-Rohingya content poured fuel on the fire of long-standing discrimination and helped to create an enabling environment for mass violence. In the absence of appropriate safeguards, Facebook’s toxic algorithms intensified a storm of hatred against the Rohingya, which contributed to these atrocities. According to a report by the United Nations, Facebook was instrumental in the radicalization of local populations and the incitement of violence against the Rohingya. 

    Rather than learning from its reckless contributions to mass violence in countries including Myanmar and Ethiopia, Meta is instead stripping away important protections that were aimed at preventing any recurrence of such harms. 

    In enacting these changes, Meta has effectively declared an open season for hate and harassment targeting its most vulnerable and at-risk people, including trans people, migrants, and refugees. 

    Meta claims to be enacting these changes to advance freedom of expression. While it is true that Meta has wrongfully restricted legitimate content in many cases, this drastic abandonment of existing safeguards is not the answer. The company must take a balanced approach that allows for free expression while safeguarding vulnerable populations. 

    All companies, including Meta, have clear responsibilities to respect all human rights in line with international human rights standards. Billionaire CEOs cannot simply pick and choose which rights to respect while flagrantly disregarding others and recklessly endangering the rights of millions. 

    Rather than learning from its reckless contributions to mass violence in countries including Myanmar and Ethiopia, Meta is instead stripping away important protections that were aimed at preventing any recurrence of such harms. 

    Pat de Brún is Head of Big Tech Accountability at Amnesty International 

    An investigation by Amnesty International in 2021 found that Meta had “substantially contributed” to the atrocities perpetrated against the Rohingya, and that the company bears a responsibility to provide an effective remedy to the community. However, Meta has made it clear it will take no such action. 

    Rohingya communities — most of whom were forced from their homes eight years ago and still reside in sprawling refugee camps in neighboring Bangladesh — have also made requests to Meta to remediate them by funding a $1 million education project in the refugee camps. The sum represents just 0.0007% of Meta’s 2023 profits of $134 billion. Despite this, Meta rejected the request. This refusal further demonstrates the company’s lack of accountability and commitment to profit over human dignity. 

    That is why we – Rohingya atrocity survivor Maung Sawyeddollah, with the support of Amnesty International, the Open Society Justice Initiative, and Victim Advocates International – on January 23, 2025, filed a whistleblower complaint with the SEC. The complaint outlines Meta’s failure to heed multiple civil society warnings from 2013 to 2017 regarding Facebook’s role in fueling violence against the Rohingya. We are asking the agency to investigate Meta for alleged violations of securities laws stemming from the company’s misrepresentations to shareholders in relation to its contribution to the atrocities suffered by the Rohingya in 2017. 

    Between 2015 and 2017, Meta executives told shareholders that Facebook’s algorithms did not result in polarization, despite warnings that its platform was actively proliferating anti-Rohingya content in Myanmar. At the same time, Meta did not fully disclose to shareholders the risks the company’s operations in Myanmar entailed. Instead, in 2015 and 2016, Meta objected to shareholder proposals to conduct a human rights impact assessment and to set up an internal committee to oversee the company’s policies and practices on international public policy issues, including human rights. 

    With Zuckerberg and other tech CEOs lining up (literally, in the case of the recent inauguration) behind the new administration’s wide-ranging attacks on human rights, Meta shareholders need to step up and hold the company’s leadership to account to prevent Meta from yet again becoming a conduit for mass violence, or even genocide. 

    Similarly, legislators and lawmakers in the US must ensure that the SEC retains its neutrality, properly investigate legitimate complaints – such as the one we recently filed, and ensure those who abuse human rights face justice. 

    Globally, governments and regional bodies such as the EU must redouble their efforts to hold Meta and other Big Tech companies to account for their human rights impacts. As we have seen before, countless human lives could be at risk if companies like Meta are left to their own devices. 

    Pat de Brún is Head of Big Tech Accountability at Amnesty International and Deputy Director of Amnesty Tech

    Maung Sawyeddollah is the founder and Executive Director of the Rohingya Students’ Network. He survived the Myanmar military’s atrocities in 2017 and fled to Bangladesh. Sawyeddollah is now studying at NYU while continuing to campaign for justice for the Rohingya. 

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: Singapore/Malaysia: Imminent execution of Pannir Selvam Pranthaman must be halted

    Source: Amnesty International –

    Amnesty International Malaysia is greatly alarmed at the scheduling of the execution of Malaysian Pannir Selvam Pranthaman in Singapore on Thursday 20 February.

    The violations of human rights protections seen in his case would render the execution arbitrary and unlawful under international law and standards. We join his family and many others in urging the authorities of Singapore to immediately halt plans to carry out the execution; and the Government of Malaysia to make every effort to intervene and help spare Pannir Selvam Pranthaman’s life. 

    Chiara Sangiorgio, Amnesty International’s death penalty expert, said: “The alarming pace of executions carried out in Singapore since October shows a chilling determination on the part of the Government to pursue hangings. This includes for offences, such as transporting drugs in Pannir’s case, that must not be punished by death under international restrictions on the use of the death penalty. This is beyond reproachable and leaves Singapore among a handful of countries known to have executed for drug-related offences in recent years.

    “We urge the Singapore government to immediately end its unlawful resort to the death penalty and immediately establish a moratorium on all executions as a first critical step towards abolition.

    “We also urge the international community to step up pressure on the government of Singapore and help prevent yet another unlawful execution from taking place. There is still time to change course and prevent this cruel and senseless execution from happening.”

    Pannir Selvam Pranthaman was convicted of importing into Singapore 51.84g of diamorphine (heroin) and was sentenced to the mandatory death penalty in 2017. The judge found that he was a “courier”, involved only with the transport of the prohibited substance. While under sentence of death in Singapore, Pannir has shown great resilience and channeled his energy into creativity, writing heartfelt songs and poems that speak of the anguish, hope, and prayers of those on death row, many of which have been shared with the public through the Sebaran Kasih NGO founded by his sister, Angelia Pranthaman.

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Shuttering govt entities? Public service boss’s comments welcomed

    Source: ACT Party

    “ACT enthusiastically welcomes a debate on shuttering redundant government entities,” says ACT Public Service spokesperson Todd Stephenson after the Public Service Commissioner raised the prospect publicly.

    “For households and businesses in an economic slump, cancelling old subscriptions is a financial no-brainer, and it’s time for the Government to run the ruler over its own redundant commitments.

    “For starters, we could close ministries focused on serving specific demographic groups, and instead spend the funding based on need, through the Social Investment Agency.

    “We could scrap the Human Rights Commission and instead strengthen the Human Rights Review Tribunal – the body that can actually act on human rights breaches.

    “We could abolish the Energy Efficiency and Conservation Authority, and the Climate Change Commission, and just let the emissions trading scheme do its job.

    “If we’re serious about growing the economy, we need to shrink the scope of the government, focus on doing the basics well, and return savings to taxpayers. We need to transfer power and resources away from Wellington and back to the firms, farms, and families doing the real work to pull us out of recession.”

    MIL OSI New Zealand News

  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: HKSAR Government confiscated criminal proceeds of absconders endangering national security in accordance with the law

    Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region

         The Court of First Instance yesterday (February 17), upon application by the Department of Justice (DoJ), issued the confiscation order under section 9 of Schedule 3 of the Implementation Rules for Article 43 of the Law of the People’s Republic of China on Safeguarding National Security in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (Implementation Rules), concerning the confiscation of proceeds Hui Chi-fung obtained from committing offences endangering national security. The Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR) Government has noted the unfounded smear and malicious attacks online regarding the actions taken by the Court in accordance with the law. The HKSAR Government strongly condemned and opposed this, and it is necessary to rebuke and to set out the following facts to set the record straight.

         An HKSAR Government spokesman stressed, “Hong Kong is a society underpinned by the rule of law and has always adhered to the principle that laws must be obeyed and lawbreakers be held accountable. Amongst others, it is a common and effective practice to make an application to the Court for a confiscation order to prevent offenders from benefiting from their criminal acts. In fact, laws and mechanisms for confiscation of crime proceeds are common around the world. They cover the crime proceeds from commission of any serious offence, including offences endangering national security.”

         “Hui Chi-fung has committed numerous heinous crimes, with a number of criminal charges being laid against him. He conspired with foreign politicians in 2020 to forge documents and deceive the court with false information in order to obtain the court’s permission to leave Hong Kong while he was on bail, and jumped bail and absconded overseas. Afterwards, Hui Chi-fung was suspected to have committed offences endangering national security overseas. On August 12, 2021 and June 21, 2023, two magistrates issued warrants against Hui Chi-fung for allegedly committed crimes of ‘inciting secession’, ‘inciting subversion of state power’, and ‘colluding with foreign or external forces to endanger national security’. Hui Chi-fung is currently a wanted person with reward notice by the Police, and specified as relevant absconder by the Secretary for Security under sections 89(1) of the Safeguarding National Security Ordinance.”

         The spokesman stressed, “The application for and issuance of the confiscation order must comply with the strict conditions specified in Schedule 3 of the Implementation Rules, including that the Court must first be satisfied that the absconded defendant could have been convicted of the relevant offence and must determine whether the defendant has benefited from that offence. The Court must also ascertain the value of the proceeds of the offence endangering national security and the amount that might be realised at the time the confiscation order is made. Therefore, there is absolutely no situation in which private property could be ‘confiscated at any time’ or ‘arbitrarily’. ”

         The spokesman pointed out, “Before and after Hui Chi-fung absconded from Hong Kong, he transferred nearly $2.5 million Hong Kong dollars in personal assets as gifts to his mother and wife. The Court is also satisfied with the relevant transaction evidence submitted by DoJ.”

         According to the law, if a defendant benefits from committing an offence endangering national security and makes a gift at any time from six years before the date of prosecution onwards, the property held by the recipient of the gift may be regarded as the defendant’s realisable property and confiscated. Mechanisms are in place worldwide to prevent criminals from transferring their criminal proceeds to others to evade confiscation.

         “The value of the criminal proceeds ordered for confiscation by the Court is determined strictly based on evidence and in accordance with the law. The value of the criminal proceeds attributed to Hui Chi-fung was calculated based on the relevant evidence to establish a reasonable value.”

         The spokesman reiterated that endangering national security is a very serious crime. The HKSAR Government will do everything possible and use all legal means to pursue and combat criminals who endanger national security as well as to hold them accountable, thereby safeguard national security.

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News

  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: NHRC, India organized a meeting of the core group in hybrid mode on ‘Recognizing progressive disabilities – Adopting a holistic approach to disability rights’

    Source: Government of India (2)

    NHRC, India organized a meeting of the core group in hybrid mode on ‘Recognizing progressive disabilities – Adopting a holistic approach to disability rights’

    NHRC, India Chairperson, Justice Shri V Ramasubramanian said that the improvement in disability-related laws, policies and their implementation need to be clearly understood

    Among various suggestions, encouragement for collaborative efforts with the private sector to provide quality employment for PwDs emphasized

    Need to revisit the 40% mark for benchmark disabilities to ensure a wide range of disability-suffering people get access to quality healthcare services

    Posted On: 17 FEB 2025 9:00PM by PIB Delhi

    The National Human Rights Commission (NHRC), India organised a core group meeting in hybrid mode on ‘Recognizing progressive disabilities- Adopting a holistic approach to disability rights’ in New Delhi today. It was chaired by NHRC, India Chairperson, Justice Shri V Ramasubramanian in the presence of Member, Justice (Dr) Bidyut Ranjan Sarangi, Secretary General, Shri Bharat Lal, Shri Rajesh Aggrawal, Secretary, Dept. of Empowerment of Persons with Disability, other senior officers from the government and NHRC, domain experts and medical professionals.

    Justice Ramasubramanian noted that it took 30 years for the world to adopt a human rights approach to disability rights. Recalling the evolution of laws and policies related to seeking the welfare of disabled persons in the world, he said that in India, parallel to the international developments included the 1987 Mental Healthcare Act, the 1995 Persons with Disabilities Act, and the 2016 Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act.

    However, he said there may be a scope for improvement in disability-related laws, policies and their implementation. For this, he said that all the stakeholders needed to prioritise their suggestions for the improvement in disability-related laws, policies and their implementation requiring the intervention of the Parliament, NHRC and judiciary need to be segregated into three categories to evolve a clear action plan.

    NHRC, India Member, Justice (Dr) Bidyut Ranjan Sarangi said that there is a need to strategise and find ways to improve the lives of persons with disabilities. Therefore, all the stakeholders including the Government need to come together and give them moral support to survive in a dignified manner. The issue of medical expenses needs to be taken into consideration and made available to the person.

    NHRC, India Secretary General, Shri Bharat Lal while setting the agenda for discussion, said that the Commission engages with many stakeholders including government officials, domain experts, researchers, academicians, and people working on the ground. He gave an overview of the three technical sessions- Defining and classifying progressive disabilities, Legal & policy framework for addressing disabilities and Promoting inclusive & equitable support services.

    Shri Rajesh Aggarwal, Secretary, Dept. of Empowerment of Persons with Disabilities, Union Ministry of Social Justice & Empowerment said that the 2011 Census reports 2.2% of India’s population as having disabilities. However, at times stigma leads to under-reporting, especially among the elderly, as disabilities in old age are often considered normal. While polio cases are decreasing due to institutional deliveries and improved care, disabilities from accidents and autism are rising, resulting in changes in the nature of disability orders. He said that regarding rights, there is a 4% reservation in government and PSU jobs and 5% in education for persons with disabilities (PwDs). He emphasized the need for better accessibility in buildings, transport, and digital platforms. India lags behind European countries in physical accessibility, though toilet facilities for PwDs have improved. Digital accessibility is relatively better.

    He stressed that education accessibility, equal opportunity, and reasonable accommodation can help 95% of people, which should be society’s priority. If there is a chance that a disability will improve or progress, a temporary certificate is given to them despite having a 5% or 80% disability. But if the disability remains the same or worsens, a permanent certificate will be given. Presently, more than 70% of certificates in the country are permanent.

    The participants included Dr Sunita Mondal, Additional Director General, Directorate General of Health Services, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Dr. Rupali Roy, Assistant Director General, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Shri Rajive Raturi, Consultant, Ms. Shivani Jadhav Representative, National Centre for Promotion of Employment for Disabled People (NCPEDP), Dr Satendra Singh, Director-Professor of Physiology, University College of Medical Sciences & GTB Hospital, Ms Purva G. Mittal, Asst. Prof, University of Delhi, Shri Akhil S. Paul, Director, Sense International (India), Dr Vaibhav Bhandari, Founder, Swavlamban Foundation, Shri Vikas Trivedi, Member Secretary Rehabilitation Council of India, New Delhi, NHRC DG(I), Shri R Prasad Meena, Registrar (Law), Shri Joginder Singh, Director, Lt Col. Virender Singh among others.

    Some of the suggestions emanated from the discussions included:

    1. Encourage collaborative efforts with the private sector to provide quality employment for PwDs;
    2. Need to revisit the 40% mark for benchmark disabilities, as this holds back many beneficiaries from being able to access quality healthcare services and even a disability certificate;
    3. Create adequate healthcare and rehabilitation provisions, particularly for those requiring high support needs, consequently, alleviating the burden of caregivers;
    4. Necessity of establishing a clear and comprehensive definition of progressive disabilities and promoting the development and accessibility of assistive technologies;
    5. Need for more inclusive and comprehensive health insurance regimes and schemes, along with increased attention to financial accessibility;
    6. Need for prenatal and pro-natal diagnosis for early intervention;
    7. Reduce the cost of medical expenses;
    8. Enhance local production of medicines to make them more cost-effective;
    9. Awareness and training for doctors, and community-based workers including ASHA workers needs to be increased for proper care of PwDs;
    10. Ensure the availability of AI products to assist persons with disabilities;
    11. Better healthcare, policies, treatments, screenings, financial aid, psychological support;
    12. Create awareness against workplace discrimination;

    The Commission will further deliberate upon the suggestions and more inputs from different stakeholders to finalize its recommendations ensuring the protection of rights of the persons with disabilities.

    ***

    NSK

    (Release ID: 2104230) Visitor Counter : 38

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News

  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: Shri Dharmendra Pradhan attends Hindu College’s 126th Founder’s Day

    Source: Government of India (2)

    Shri Dharmendra Pradhan attends Hindu College’s 126th Founder’s Day

    Hindu College has carved an unparalleled legacy in shaping India’s intellectual, cultural and national identity – Shri Dharmendra Pradhan

    Students of Hindu College will become wealth-creators, job-creators, deep-tech innovators, policymakers and global citizens of tomorrow

    Posted On: 17 FEB 2025 8:57PM by PIB Delhi

    Union Minister for Education, Shri Dharmendra Pradhan, attended an event celebrating Hindu College’s 126th Founder’s Day in New Delhi today. Academicians, staff members and students also were present at the event. He engaged with the students and faculty of the college during his visit to the exhibition on Skill Development and Entrepreneurship activities. While exploring ideas, prototypes, and business models, he expressed confidence that they will serve as flag-bearers of innovation, entrepreneurship, job creation, and wealth generation in the times ahead.

     

    While addressing the event, Shri Dharmendra Pradhan highlighted the esteemed legacy of Hindu College, describing it as a temple of learning and a cradle of educational excellence, innovation, diversity, plurality, democratic ethos, nationalistic spirit, and nation-building.

    He reflected on the college’s founding by Shri Krishan Dass Ji Gurwale, who sought to counter Macaulay’s efforts to dismantle India’s education system and culture. He emphasized how Hindu College has since carved an unparalleled legacy in shaping India’s intellectual, cultural, and national identity. The path of progress and prosperity on which India stands today, he asserted, has been paved by Hindu College.

    Shri Pradhan also remarked that while creating a legacy is easier, sustaining it requires relentless dedication. Congratulating the students, faculty, and staff for their unwavering ‘Sadhna’ in upholding the college’s tradition of excellence, he urged them to continue this commitment, striving to transform the institution into a global hub of solutions.

    He also underscored that Viksit Bharat 2047 is a collective goal for all Indians. The next 22-25 years, he noted, mark the Amrit Kaal, a crucial period for the Hindu College community. He emphasized that as India celebrates the centenary of its independence, Hindu College will also mark its 150th Founder’s Day. During this pivotal phase, the college must aspire to establish itself as an epicentre of research, innovation, entrepreneurship, and solutions to 21st-century challenges, he added.

    Expressing confidence in Hindu College’s role in shaping India’s future, he envisioned it emerging as a ‘Captain’ of India’s transformation in the coming decades. He expressed hope that its students will evolve into wealth-creators, job-creators, deep-tech innovators, policymakers, and global citizens of tomorrow.

    *****

    MV/AK

    MOE/DoHE/17 February 2025/2

    (Release ID: 2104228) Visitor Counter : 44

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News

  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: Prime Minister welcomes Amir of Qatar H.H. Sheikh Tamim Bin Hamad Al Thani to India

    Source: Government of India (2)

    Posted On: 17 FEB 2025 8:53PM by PIB Delhi

    The Prime Minister, Shri Narendra Modi extended a warm welcome to the Amir of Qatar, H.H. Sheikh Tamim Bin Hamad Al Thani, upon his arrival in India.

    The Prime Minister said in X post;

    “Went to the airport to welcome my brother, Amir of Qatar H.H. Sheikh Tamim Bin Hamad Al Thani. Wishing him a fruitful stay in India and looking forward to our meeting tomorrow.

    @TamimBinHamad”

     

     

    ***

    MJPS/ST

    (Release ID: 2104225) Visitor Counter : 77

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News

  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: Hong Kong Customs combats suspected illicit cigarette distribution activities in Sham Shui Po (with photos)

    Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region

         Hong Kong Customs today (February 17) conducted an anti-illicit cigarette operation in Sham Shui Po to fight against criminals involved in illicit cigarettes distribution in the district. About 5 500 suspected illicit cigarettes, with an estimated market value of about $24,000 and a duty potential of about $18,000, were seized.
          
         This afternoon, Customs intercepted a suspicious non-local man in Pei Ho Street, Sham Shui Po. About 4 500 suspected illicit cigarettes were found from two nylon bags carried by him. The 54-year-old man, who claimed to be unemployed, was immediately arrested.
          
         Subsequently, Customs officers conducted further investigation in nearby illicit cigarettes black spots and further seized about 1 000 suspected illicit cigarettes, thereby disrupting relevant distribution activities.
          
         The arrested man was charged with “dealing with goods to which the Dutiable Commodities Ordinance applies” and will appear at the West Kowloon Magistrates’ Courts tomorrow (February 18).
          
         Customs will continue its risk assessment and intelligence analysis for interception at source as well as through its multipronged enforcement strategy targeting storage, distribution and peddling to spare no effort in combating illicit cigarette activities.
          
         Customs stresses that it is an offence to buy or sell illicit cigarettes. Under the Dutiable Commodities Ordinance, anyone involved in dealing with, possession of, selling or buying illicit cigarettes commits an offence. The maximum penalty upon conviction is a fine of $1 million and imprisonment for two years.
          
         Members of the public may report any suspected illicit cigarette activities to Customs’ 24-hour hotline 182 8080 or its dedicated crime-reporting email account (crimereport@customs.gov.hk) or online form (eform.cefs.gov.hk/form/ced002/).      

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News

  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: ECI bids farewell to Shri Rajiv Kumar, the 25th CEC of India

    Source: Government of India

    Posted On: 17 FEB 2025 8:30PM by PIB Delhi

    The Election Commission of India today bid farewell to Shri Rajiv Kumar who will be demitting the office of Chief Election Commissioner on 18.02.2025.

    Shri Rajiv Kumar had joined ECI as Election Commissioner on September 1st, 2020 and assumed charge as the 25th Chief Election Commissioner of India on May 15, 2022. His tenure spanning 4.5 years in the Commission was characterized by silent yet deep-rooted reforms across various domains spanning structural, technological,        capacity development, communication, international cooperation and administration. Shri Kumar during his tenure has completed one full electoral cycle with conduct of elections in 31 States/UTs, the Presidential and Vice-Presidential elections 2022, Lok Sabha elections 2024 and Rajya Sabha renewals -a rare and monumental feat in electoral management. The elections were conducted peacefully with near zero repolls and incidents of violence.

    In his farewell address, CEC Shri Rajiv Kumar thanked the 15 million polling officials for their dedication to uphold democratic values. He asserted that the trust of close to nearly a billion voters is unfazed by motivated and uncorroborated attacks on India’s democratic institutions. As a proponent of technology, Shri Kumar outlined a path for strengthening conduct of elections while guarding against the threats of cyber-attacks and misinformation on social media. He lauded the voters for their vibrant participation especially women voters and said that the electoral process is marching towards more inclusivity. His full speech is annexed.

    The Election Commissioners Shri Gyanesh Kumar and Dr. Sukhbir Singh Sandhu conveyed their appreciation for the inclusive, transformative and purpose driven leadership of CEC Shri Rajiv Kumar, that has strengthened electoral processes and has raised India’s stature globally in the field of election management.

    CEC Shri Kumar’s tenure was marked by a slew of electoral reforms, including operationalizing four qualifying dates for voter registration with advanced application facility for 17+ youngsters; simplified forms for voter registration; redefining electoral boundaries with delimitation in Assam;

    ensuring voting by polling personnel at Voter Facilitation Centre to avoid any intimidation, delays and wrong doing. These initiatives were aimed at empowering every eligible citizen while modernizing election administration.

    Shri Kumar championed technology-driven electoral reforms to enhance efficiency, transparency, and accessibility. Under his leadership, ERONET 2.0, managing largest electoral databases, strengthened voter roll management with multi-layered security, seamless, and real-time application processing. Shri Kumar also established mechanisms to tackle the challenge of misinformation and fake news on social media platforms. A myth vs reality register was launched during Lok Sabha Elections 2024.

    Shri Kumar’s contributions were both systemic and profoundly human. His hands-on leadership was evident in his actions. On the global stage, his efforts amplified India’s voice in advancing democratic values, with the Election Commission spearheading ‘Cohort on Election integrity’ and training officials from many election management bodies.

    Beyond institutional reforms and global leadership, his tenure was defined by deeply personal and compassionate gestures that embodied the human spirit of democracy. He believed every voter, regardless of age or ability, deserved recognition and respect. For an inclusive election, efforts were made to enrol marginalised sections like PVTGs and third genders. While conveying his respect, he wrote personalized letters to over 2.5 lakh centenarian voters for their contribution to democracy. He also called upon Youth and Urban voters to get inspired and engage actively in the electoral process.  He consistently raised and pursued innovative measures like establishment of polling stations in high rise societies to address the rising trend of youth and urban apathy in the election process.

    A passionate trekker, he undertook a strenuous journey to one of India’s most remote polling stations to understand challenges faced by polling personnel, inspired innovations like specially designed EVM carry bags for easier transport in tough terrains. Route rationalization and near removal of P-3 polling stations. Known for his poetic expressions, CEC Kumar used shayari to make complex electoral issues relatable, engaging the public and reinforcing trust in the democratic process. A lover of Indian vocal classical and devotional music, Shri Kumar also practices meditation.

    ***

    PK/GDH/RP

    Annexure

    Farewell speech of Sh Rajiv Kumar, the 25th Chief Election Commissioner on 17 Feb 2025

    Executive summary:

    Unwavering faith in democracy and the wisdom of close to a billion Indian voters is a guarantee that democratic values will only grow stronger. The commitment of 15 million polling personnel ensures free and fair elections, reinforcing public confidence in the system. Motivated and uncorroborated attacks on democratic institutions will not shake their trust, which is paramount and is a legacy built over 75 years. The increasing participation of women voters, surpassing male turnout in many states, marks a historic shift, strengthening democratic engagement. However, urban voter apathy remains a pressing concern despite outreach efforts. For a more inclusive electoral engagement, remote voting mechanisms for migrants and enabling NRIs to vote must be prioritized.

    Technology is transforming conduct of elections. Innovations like biometric authentication and the totalizer system will strengthen the process. AI can revolutionize conduct of elections, but safeguards against cyber threats and disinformation are crucial. Social media companies must introspect and act responsibly by not letting their algorithms propagate fake narratives. Media and social media platforms must ensure that truth prevails over misinformation.

    1. transparency in the functioning of political parties is essential. The Integrated Election Expenditure Management System has been a step forward, but mandatory e-compliance for political party funding and expenditure is necessary. Misuse of Registered Unrecognized Political Parties (RUPPs) for tax evasion must be curbed with vigilant monitoring. Political parties must ensure that promises in manifestos are backed by clear financial disclosures to prevent fiscal mismanagement and timely court order will facilitate.

    The Model Code of Conduct has upheld electoral fairness, ensuring responsible campaigning without restricting political debate. However, political parties must take accountability for their star campaigners’ rhetoric and strive for constructive, issue-based debates.

    The rising trend of misleading narratives during peak polling or counting hours is a deliberate attempt to distort facts and mislead voters. Casting doubt on outcomes after active and full participation in the process is undesirable. While the Commission exercises constitutional restraint, such tactics are better avoided in the interest of a mature democracy. The judiciary’s role in upholding electoral integrity remains vital. In the course of judicial proceedings, due consideration to election timelines must be maintained.

    India’s expertise in election management system is globally respected and is one of the biggest soft-power of the country. As the leadership transitions, the Election Commission remains committed to strengthening democracy through transparency, innovation, and inclusivity.

    As I bid farewell to this esteemed institution, which has been nothing short of a place of worship, I extend my deepest gratitude to all those who have been part of this incredible journey.

    First and foremost, my heartfelt thanks to the Indian voters, whose numbers have surged to almost a billion. Their unwavering faith in democracy has been the cornerstone of my strength. It is always inspiring to witness democracy in action, the strength of inclusivity and demographic diversity at the polling stations with diverse mosaic of electors including women, youngsters, PwDs, elderly voters, PVTGs, third genders, etc. This also reflects a profound message of hope in Indian democracy. The very essence of democracy lies in its inclusivity, ensuring that every voice, regardless of age, gender, or ability, is heard and valued.

    The sight of long voter queues in places like Jammu and Kashmir and Left-Wing Extremism-affected areas speaks volumes about the people’s faith in the electoral process.  A peaceful, violence free election in these regions is not just an achievement; it is a testament to the power of the vote in shaping the nation’s future, victory of ballot over bullet.

    Our voters are our biggest asset.  I salute the wisdom and maturity of our voters, who can discern truth from misinformation. Their awareness and commitment to democratic values reflect their readiness to shape a just and progressive future. I firmly believe that our voters’ wisdom and active engagement at all layers of democracy guarantee that our nation will prosper, democratic values will only grow stronger, designed and uncorroborated attacks on democratic institutions will not shake their trust. India will continue to create democratic surpluses for the democracy’s world over.

    I also want to convey my gratitude to the women voters who turned out in large numbers, surpassing male turnout in many states, and finally in 2024 Lok Sabha election as well. They have created a new chapter in electoral history, showcasing their vital role in shaping the future of this nation.

     I thank the young and first-time voters who came out to vote, as they are the future and the true ambassadors of our democracy.  Your participation is not just a right but a responsibility. It can bring change, build a better future, and make a real impact. Exercise your franchise wisely, for every vote contributes to a stronger democracy. It becomes an anxiety if you do not step forward.

    While the nation takes pride in conducting one of the largest elections in the world, the lack of voter participation in major urban center’s raises pressing concerns. The trend of urban voter apathy is highly disconcerting. The vibrant hustle of city life often masks a troubling silence at polling booths reflecting a democracy deficit in making. Despite massive outreach and better access to polling stations, facilities, and even scheduling of elections mid-week, urban voters often neglect their responsibility to vote. Continued engagement with urban voters is a must.

    A heartfelt gratitude to the vast family of polling personnel and security staff, the foot soldiers of the Election Commission of India. Their numbers surged to an incredible 15 million during the last Lok Sabha elections, yet their dedication to upholding democracy has never wavered. Their relentless efforts ensure the seamless conduct of elections, time and again. And I am confident that as long as our foot soldiers continue to perform their duties with transparency and impartiality, engaging political parties and the media at every step, no one can weaken the strong democracy of our country regardless of any insinuations that come their way.

    I extend my gratitude to my fellow Commissioners, past and present, whose wisdom and collaboration have enriched the Commission’s work. To my colleagues at Nirvachan Sadan and Chief Electoral Officers across states, your commitment has been instrumental in carrying forward the mission of free and fair elections. Conducting elections in the world’s largest democracy is no small task, and it has been an honor to work alongside such dedicated and selfless colleagues.

    Internationally, it has been an honour to engage with Election Management Bodies worldwide, exchanging ideas to strengthen democratic processes across borders. I was overwhelmed by the respect that India attracts in conduct of free, and fair elections in the largest democracy in the world and the expectations that global election management community has to learn from the Indian experience.

    Conducting elections in the world’s largest democracy is an immense responsibility, one that requires constant innovation and vigilance. As I pass the baton to my successors, leaving the commission in experienced and competent hands, I acknowledge the evolving challenges ahead. The future of elections will be shaped by a complex and multifaceted blend of technological advancements, voter engagement, influx of fake narratives and the balancing of transparency with privacy. The Election Commission has to remain steadfast in preserving the trust of voters while adapting to these new realities.

    The Model Code of Conduct has played a crucial role in maintaining a delicate balance between allowing robust political debate and ensuring responsible campaigning. While it has been leveraged effectively to uphold electoral fairness, we must remain mindful that any overreach could stifle genuine political expression, just as unchecked violations could undermine the sanctity of elections. The challenge ahead lies in carefully calibrating the MCC’s enforcement, ensuring it remains an effective tool for ethical campaigning without becoming an undue constraint on democratic expression. The Commission on many occasions in the past tread upon a fine line which required the balancing of proactive actions with constitutional wisdom and restraint in the interest of allowing for the fullest and vibrant electoral participation by parties and candidates alike, while not overrun the legal judicial process. Political Parties and their presidents must also take responsibility for the utterance of their star campaigners and leaders.

    Technology has been a powerful enabler in our electoral processes, helping refine voter rolls, streamline operations, and engage citizens more effectively. We are at the forefront of adopting technology in our electoral operations. The suite of more than 20 applications provides the perfect ecosystem for rolling the giant wheel of the electoral system from Registration to Results.

    ERONET is a web-based platform for Electoral officials, supporting 14 languages and 11 scripts to manage the country’s largest electoral database safely. It standardizes form processing, database structure, and E-Roll printing while automating voter registration, verification, and decision support. Used across all States/UTs, it ensures a seamless, integrated electoral roll management system on a national-level infrastructure. Using facial recognition software’s, our electoral rolls have been further purified.

    However, innovations like biometric authentication may further help prevent impersonation and multiple voting, ensuring that every vote belongs to the rightful voter. Additionally, emerging technologies hold great potential for more efficient management of movement of man and material, AI enabled capacity building modules, enhancing transparency and security in elections, etc.

    Presently in the system of counting of votes, the result is retrieved from each EVM, then the votes polled in respect of each candidate is totaled and result is declared. The demerit of this system of counting is that the candidates can know from where they have received how much vote. This leads to the problem of post-election violence, victimization and exclusion of the supporters of opposition parties from developmental activities. To address this, technologies like the totalizer, already developed by the Commission would ensure that the votes polled by each candidate- polling station wise is not disclosed. I believe that this matter should be explored, political consensus attempted and tested on a pilot basis to enhance voter secrecy and protect the integrity of the electoral process.

    The Election Commission has always worked to make elections more inclusive, ensuring that every voter can exercise their franchise. However, with nearly 300 million electors not engaging in the electoral process, due to reasons including migration- domestic and external, it is imperative to move forward with pilot programs for Remote Voting Mechanisms.  ECI has explored the option of using a modified version of the existing model of M3 EVMs to enable voting at remote polling stations i.e. polling stations outside home constituency, for domestic migrants. A Concept Note for on the matter of improving voter participation of domestic migrants using remote voting was also shared with all Recognized National and State Political Parties, ahead of all party consultation held on 16.01.2023. Efforts to build consensus among various stakeholders must continue to bring the ballot closer to those who cannot reach polling stations.

    India’s growing aspirations for its rightful place in world order, require to show deep commitment to Commission’s moto of “ No voter to be left behind”. It is right time to enable our Non-Resident Indians to vote from outside the country. Commission has developed necessary mechanisms required. The Government should take a final decision swiftly to enfranchise those who contribute significantly to our nation from afar.

    Financial transparency in elections remains a vital pillar of democratic integrity and level playing field. The introduction of the Integrated Election Expenditure Management System (IEMS) has been a significant step for an online compliance framework for financial reporting by political parties. However, as the compliance was voluntary, most of the major parties continue to use offline mode, despite IEMS being user friendly with lots of pre-populated data fields and facility to directly upload csv files. Therefore, Commission in future may consider bringing the full political party compliance and engagement ecosystem online and making e-compliance mandatory in future.

    Political parties must uphold transparency in both fundraising and expenditure. Certain RUPPs had become instruments for tax evasion by way of bogus donation rackets and thereby misused enabling provisions of the Income-tax Act and R.P. Act. The Commission while doing the massive verification exercise of RUPPs also verified the financial compliance status of RUPPs. The exercise not only resulted in delisting/ declaring inactive of non-compliant RUPPs, it also flagged the issue of misuse of exemption provision under the income-tax Act. CBDT, since then has been taking necessary enforcement actions to curb this misuse of RUPPs. However, as the RUPPs make their compliance before respective CEOs, the offices of CEOs need to be more sensitized towards various aspects of financial compliances by political parties. Transparency and accountability must remain at the heart of political financing reforms.

    The Commission remains steadfast in its commitment to addressing concerns surrounding unchecked freebies and overpromising manifestos. While the matter related to freebies is currently sub-judice, and I hope for a timely decision from the court, it is imperative in the interim that political promises are backed by clear disclosures on their financial viability and their effect on the fiscal health of the state.  We had also prescribed formats to ensure that political parties transparently display the financial implications of their promises against well-defined, quantifiable parameters like quantum of funds required to fulfill promise, availability of fiscal space, means to fulfill promise by cutting expenditure or augmenting revenue,  revenue deficit, fiscal deficit, requirement of any additional borrowings, impact on fiscal deficit, etc. to let voter know the feasibility of fulfilling the promise within the available State or Union financial space.

    Additionally, emerging technologies hold great potential for more efficient management of polling logistics and operation, AI-enabled capacity building modules and enhancing transparency and security in elections. AI can inter alia be leveraged to ensure that voter information, and voting instructions are available in multiple languages and that voting mechanisms are accessible to all voters.

    While the integration of AI and digital tools holds great promise, we must also guard against their misuse. The rise of cyber threats and disinformation campaigns necessitates stronger safeguards and strategic countermeasures. The unchecked use of bots, fake SM content, and AI-generated content during campaigns can distort public opinion and polarize societies. The Election Commission of India’s has recently issued advisory to political parties mandating the clear labeling of AI-generated content on social media. This is a significant step in the direction of protecting democratic discourse.

    Social media companies must introspect on their role in upholding free speech while ensuring it does not become a casualty of their own algorithmic shortcomings. The very freedom they champion should not be compromised by their failure to detect even the most obvious fake content. Timely detection and labeling of misinformation are crucial before it spreads unchecked.

    We have also seen many digital portals propagating misleading narratives and half-truths. While the Commission is generally restrained in reaction, I urge CEOs of various states to not only respond to such issues but also to preempt and actively dispel such notions.

    As a nation celebrating 75 years of its Republic, it is worth reflecting on the nature of election campaigns. A concerning trend has emerged in recent years, with political discourse increasingly becoming such that scars are left even after campaign period. This not only lowers the quality of debate but also risks disillusioning our youth with the electoral process. Should we not strive for a more constructive and dignified dialogue? Should political parties not focus on issue-based debates? Should political parties not take responsibility for encouraging youth participation through their campaigns? These are the questions political parties must introspect.

    I have observed a pattern in the timing of certain narratives. During peak polling or counting hours, a wave of fake allegations and rumors begins to spread across media and social media, misleading people and creating confusion. Narratives are deliberately set to distort facts. However, the Commission follows a policy of restraint, choosing not to respond while the election process is underway, ensuring that focus remains on the integrity and smooth conduct of the elections. The live reporting of hearing of the long pending cases at critical junctures, sometimes fuel distrust that the petitioner intends to create. It would be beneficial if such proceedings are scheduled with due consideration to the election period, ensuring that the electoral process remains smooth and undisturbed. This is a specific expectation of India’s esteemed constitutional Courts. I say this while recording my gratitude for the higher judiciary of the country which has consistently acted as the guardian spirit of India’s electoral process and system.

    The Commission, as an institution, often finds itself unfairly blamed by those unwilling to accept electoral outcomes. A pressing concern is the growing tendency to target election officials in the aftermath of electoral contests. It is perceived as a convenient scapegoat. All candidates and parties are involved in every stage of the process with utmost transparency. Having participated in each step, without raising objections or filing appeals during the process, then attempting to create doubt afterward is undesirable.  Dialogue should always be the preferred approach and while the Commission reacts with sagacity, stoicism and restraint, this is a disturbing trend and should be abandoned soon. 

    The media is playing a crucial role in ensuring transparency and accountability in the electoral process. All out efforts must continue to involve them at every stage of electoral cycle so that in the rush to break news first, misinformation and false narratives do not gain undue prominence. 

    India stands as a global beacon of democracy with one of the largest and most transparent election systems, India’s democratic framework has the quality to inspire nations worldwide and thus a soft power to be adequately leveraged.

    Lastly, as I step away, I do so know that the responsibility we carry is greater than of any one individual but is upheld by each of you every day. I hope the Commission continues to strengthen this great institution, uphold its values. I am confident that I am leaving Commission in more competent, committed and professional hands.

    Thank you, and my best wishes to all of you.

    *********

    (Release ID: 2104214) Visitor Counter : 33

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News

  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: DoT and ITU Join Hands to Explore Future-Ready Infrastructure Planning with AI- Driven Digital Twin Technologies

    Source: Government of India (2)

    DoT and ITU Join Hands to Explore Future-Ready Infrastructure Planning with AI- Driven Digital Twin Technologies

    Letter of Intent (LoI) signed for collaboration between ITU and the Ministry of Communications, Government of India

    Strengthening India’s Global Digital Leadership: India proposes to host the ITU-Plenipotentiary Conference 2030

    Posted On: 17 FEB 2025 7:58PM by PIB Delhi

    Secretary (Telecom), Department of Telecommunications (DoT), Government of India, Dr. Neeraj Mittal embarked on an official visit to Geneva today to further strengthen India’s global digital leadership and deepen engagements with key international stakeholders in the telecommunication sector.

    During his visit, Department of Telecommunications (DoT) and the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) signed a Letter of Intent (LoI), marking the beginning of a new phase of strategic collaboration. Through this LoI, both sides intend to initiate discussions regarding the conditions and modalities for carrying out common initiatives and projects, particularly to

    • drive innovation in digital twins, AI-driven solutions, virtual world technologies, and the transformative potential of IMT-2030 technologies;
    • promote the development of global standards and best practices to ensure seamless interoperability and scalability;
    • advance sustainable development through shared frameworks, capacity building, and cross-sectoral collaboration, and
    • Foster citizen engagement and participatory approaches to urban and infrastructure planning.

     

    Dr Mittal held various meetings with leadership of ITU. In his meeting with Ms. Doreen Bogdan-Martin, Secretary-General, ITU, Dr. Mittal reaffirmed India’s commitment to digital connectivity, inclusion, and innovation. Key focus areas of discussion included India’s leadership in 5G/6G technologies, AI for Digital Transformation, cybersecurity frameworks, and ITU’s Partner2Connect initiative aimed at bridging the global digital divide. India also reiterated its pledge to support ITU’s initiatives by contributing to global connectivity projects and skill development programs.

    Further, with the aim of positioning India as a global hub for policy discourse on telecommunications and ICT regulations, Dr Mittal also proposed to host the ITU-Plenipotentiary Conference 2030 in India. India’s proposal was positively acknowledged, and discussions will continue at the upcoming ITU Council Meeting. India has successfully hosted WTSA -2024 in New Delhi in Oct 2024.

    Next-generation mobile communication technologies are evolving beyond traditional connectivity to become essential platforms for innovative infrastructure planning. By seamlessly integrating AI, Digital Twins, and real-time, ubiquitous connectivity into a unified ecosystem, these technologies generate pervasive intelligence, enabling open, interconnected systems that fundamentally transform how infrastructure is planned, collaborated on, and executed across critical sectors like transport, urban development, and healthcare. These advancements enable infrastructure planning to be more dynamic, adaptive, and sustainable, benefiting all sectors.

    The collaboration through the LoI  marks a significant shift in the telecom sector’s role—evolving from simply providing connectivity to becoming a platform that delivers accurate, reliable, and insightful data for infrastructure planning. It opens up opportunities to explore innovative business models, enabling a new ecosystem to deliver scalable, data-driven, and knowledge- based solutions across industries, driving sustainable growth and shaping the future of infrastructure.

    • Knowledge Sharing and Capacity Building: Facilitate the exchange of insights from initiatives like DoT’s Sangam and ITU’s Citiverse to improve cross-sectoral data integration and collaborative planning.
    • Global Standards Development: Contribute to ITU-T Study Group 20 on IoT, digital twins, and smart cities to create global standards, APIs, and methodologies ensuring seamless scalability of AI-driven solutions.
    • Sandbox Environments and Demonstrations: Establish sandbox environments to test innovative digital twin technologies, conduct pilot projects, and adapt regulatory frameworks that validate the transformative potential of these technologies.
    • Citizen Engagement and Simulations: Use AI-powered platforms to engage citizens in real-time urban planning and infrastructure development, enhancing participatory governance and collaborative decision-making.
    • Mobile Phone Data (MPD) and Privacy: Exchange insights on privacy-enhancing techniques (PETs) and their use in ICT measurement, particularly in the context of building digital twins for urban planning.
    • AI Model Integration for Digital Twins: Customize AI models using country-specific datasets to deliver context-sensitive solutions for infrastructure development and urban mobility challenges.

     

    <><><>

    SB

    (Release ID: 2104198) Visitor Counter : 59

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News

  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: Department of Telecommunications and ITU Sign Letter of Intent to Collaborate on PhD Research Through Academic Dialogues with experts in Telecom Research

    Source: Government of India (2)

    Department of Telecommunications and ITU Sign Letter of Intent to Collaborate on PhD Research Through Academic Dialogues with experts in Telecom Research

    This partnership enables knowledge exchange between Indian researchers and global telecom experts

    “Through this collaboration, the DoT aims to empower Indian researchers and institutions to drive global innovation in telecom technologies of the future”: Dr Neeraj Mittal, Secretary (Telecom)

    This collaborations purposes to enhance India’s presence in the global telecom standardization and policy-setting ecosystem

    Posted On: 17 FEB 2025 7:53PM by PIB Delhi

    The Department of Telecommunications (DoT), Ministry of Communications, Government of India, and the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) have signed a Letter of Intent (LoI) in Geneva (Switzerland) today to initiate discussions on a collaborative PhD fellowship scheme in the field of telecommunications and associated emerging technologies. This initiative aims to strengthen India’s contributions to global telecom research and standards by fostering closer ties between Indian academia and the ITU. The proposed scheme envisions supporting PhD fellowships over five years in the ITU focus areas.

    The signing of LoI followed Secretary (Telecom), Department of Telecommunications (DoT), Government of India, Dr. Neeraj Mittal’s meeting with Ms. Doreen Bogdan-Martin, Secretary-General, ITU and other key officials.  Dr. Mittal is on an official visit to Geneva (Switzerland) to further strengthen India’s global digital leadership and deepen engagements with key international stakeholders in the telecommunication sector.

    Brief on the Proposed Initiative

    India’s rapidly expanding telecom sector, the second largest globally, requires continuous innovation. The ITU, a UN specialized agency, plays a key role in shaping global ICT standards. The collaboration between DoT and ITU seeks to align Indian research with ITU priorities, amplifying India’s voice in global telecommunications, particularly for the benefit of developing nations.

    The DoT will coordinate with ITU through a designated focal point, identify and support participating universities, provide feedback on research topics, grant fellowships to PhD scholars, and facilitate their engagement with ITU, including study visits. A government-nominated member of their university’s advisory committee will supervise scholars.

    Exploring Academia and Global Telecom Standards

    With the signing of the LoI, the Government of India and ITU have expressed their intent to establish a collaborative initiative that encourages PhD scholars from premier Indian institutions to conduct research in strategic areas relevant to ITU Study Groups or priority areas. This partnership will facilitate knowledge exchange between Indian researchers and global telecom experts, ensuring that Indian innovations contribute to the development of future telecom technologies and international standards.

    Key Highlights of the Proposed Collaboration

    • International Exposure: Indian scholars will have opportunities to engage with ITU experts, participate in ITU Study Group meetings, and present research at international forums.
    • Institutional Collaboration: Participating Indian institutions will receive Government of India sponsored ITU-academia membership, providing access to ITU’s extensive research resources, databases, and global academic networks.
    • Guided Research: Scholars will work under the co-supervision of ITU-appointed experts and a DoT-nominated member in their Research Advisory Committee (RAC) to align their work with global research priorities.

    Strengthening India’s Role in Global Telecom Research

    India’s telecom sector is evolving rapidly with advancements in 5G, AI, IoT, cybersecurity, and quantum computing. By aligning PhD research with ITU’s focus areas, this proposed scheme will enhance India’s presence in the global telecom standardization and policy-setting ecosystem.

    Welcoming the signing of LoI, Dr. Neeraj Mittal said, “The signing of this LoI with ITU is a significant step toward fostering cutting-edge research and positioning India as a key contributor to global telecom standards. Through this collaboration, Department of Telecommunications (DoT), Government of India aims to empower Indian researchers and institutions to drive innovation in telecom technologies of the future”.

    Key Benefits of the Collaboration

    This collaboration offers significant advantages for all stakeholders:

    • For DoT: Supports research aligned with national telecom goals, facilitating universal connectivity and ensuring India’s perspective in global standard-setting.
    • For ITU: Enables closer engagement with Indian academia, accessing a rich pool of research talent and valuable insights.
    • For Research Scholars: Provides invaluable experience through interactions with ITU experts, access to global resources, and opportunities for international collaboration.

    Way Forward: Positioning India as a Leader in Telecom Standardization

    The signing of the LoI marks the beginning of discussions on the specific details of the fellowship scheme, including potential deliverables, timelines, and implementation strategies. Both DoT and ITU recognize the importance of this collaboration in advancing telecom research and fostering cutting-edge technological innovations that benefit both India and the global community. By engaging with ITU’s key research priority areas, India aims to strengthen its capabilities in emerging telecom technologies, enhancing its role as a leader in global telecom research and standardization. This initiative will help India shape the future of telecommunications, ensuring its active participation in defining global standards and policies.

     

    <><><>

    SB

    (Release ID: 2104195) Visitor Counter : 84

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News

  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: Hear it from the best expert, the Exam Warriors who have successfully overcome exam stress and anxiety: Prime Minister

    Source: Government of India

    Posted On: 17 FEB 2025 7:39PM by PIB Delhi

    A special episode of Pariksha Pe Charcha 2025 is set to air on 18th February at 11 AM, featuring young Exam Warriors who have successfully overcome exam stress and anxiety. The episode will showcase their experiences, strategies, and insights on beating exam stress, anxiety and staying chill under pressure.

    Announcing the this special episode on social media, Prime Minister Narendra Modi wrote on X;

    “Hear it from the best experts…the #ExamWarriors who have successfully overcome exam stress and anxiety. Tomorrow’s ’Pariksha Pe Charcha’ features my young friends who will share their experiences.”

     

     

    ***

    MJPS/SR

    (Release ID: 2104189) Visitor Counter : 26

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News

  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: MeitY to Launch Digital Brand Identity Manual (DBIM) Tomorrow Aiming to Achieve Uniform Look & Feel in Government Websites

    Source: Government of India

    MeitY to Launch Digital Brand Identity Manual (DBIM) Tomorrow Aiming to Achieve Uniform Look & Feel in Government Websites

    Manual Defines citizen-friendly User Experience by Harmonizing  Visual & Voice Identities for an Enhanced National & Global Digital Footprint of Gov.In Domain

    MeitY to Organise First Chief Information Commissioners(CIO) Conference 2025

    Posted On: 17 FEB 2025 7:25PM by PIB Delhi

    Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY) is set to release the Digital Brand Identity Manual (DBIM) tomorrow as part of its efforts to bring uniformity across government websites and digital platforms. The DBIM defines key elements of a consistent digital identity, including visual identities such as logos, color palettes, typography, and imagery, as well as verbal identities like brand voice, messaging frameworks, and taglines. These guidelines aim to enhance citizen engagement and improve the overall user experience in service delivery.

    As part of the Gov.In: Harmonisation of Government of India’s Digital Footprint initiative, the DBIM seeks to establish a standardized and seamless digital presence across government ministries, departments, and agencies. This initiative aligns with the vision of Prime Minister Narendra Modi to transform governance through technology, ensuring accessibility, efficiency, and a more citizen-friendly digital experience.

    The primary objective of the DBIM is to create a unified and consistent digital brand for the Government of India. By standardizing elements such as color palettes, typography, and iconography, the manual not only ensures uniformity in look and feel but also strengthens the integrity of government-hosted data. This cohesive approach will enable government departments to present a compelling and trustworthy brand presence, both nationally and globally. The guidelines extend beyond websites to cover mobile applications and social media platforms, reinforcing a seamless user experience across all digital touchpoints.

    To mark this milestone, the launch of the Digital Brand Identity Manual (DBIM) and the First CIO Conference 2025 will be held on 18th February 2025 at Taj Palace, New Delhi. The event will be graced by key stakeholders, including representatives from MeitY, NIC, MyGov, and other government ministries. Shri Jitin Prasada, Union Minister of State for Electronics and Information Technology and Commerce & Industry, will officially launch the DBIM, introducing the framework for a unified digital identity across government platforms.

    Key Components of the Initiative

    The harmonisation initiative is built on the following key elements:

    • Digital Brand Identity Manual (DBIM): A comprehensive guide to ensure visual and functional consistency across government websites.
    • DBIM Toolkit: A set of tools enabling seamless adoption of DBIM.
    • GOV.IN CMS Platform: A standardized content management system tailored for DBIM Compliant websites and applications.
    • Central Content Publishing System: A streamlined mechanism for centralized content updates.
    • Social Media Integration: A unified approach to social media branding and digital outreach.

     

    Planned Activities at the Event

    The event will serve as a platform to discuss the roadmap for the adoption of DBIM across government websites and applications. Key highlights include:

    • Release of the Digital Brand Identity Manual (DBIM)
    • Launch of the DBIM-Compliant MeitY Website
    • Comprehensive discussions on harmonisation components
    • Capacity-building sessions for Chief Information Officers (CIOs)

     

    This initiative is led by the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology: Digital Governance Division and National Informatics Centre. To explore various government digital services and platforms, visit www.nic.in

    ****

    Dharmendra Tewari/Shatrunjay Kumar

    (Release ID: 2104185) Visitor Counter : 99

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News