NewzIntel.com

Category: Asia Pacific

  • MIL-Evening Report: Political parties can recover after a devastating election loss. But the Liberals will need to think differently

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Frank Bongiorno, Professor of History, ANU College of Arts and Social Sciences, Australian National University

    Australia has just had its second landslide election in a row.

    In 2022, there was a landslide against the Liberals, but not to Labor, which fell over the line (as a majority government) by three seats and with just over 32% of the primary vote. But the Coalition – actually Liberal – loss of seats, at 19, was the kind of result usually associated with the term “landslide”.

    In 2025, we have a genuine landside to Labor. At the time of writing, the ABC has declared a Labor gain of 15 seats (78 to 93), but with the strong likelihood of one more, and an outside chance of another.

    Labor’s share of the two-party preferred vote sits at 54.8%. To add a bit of historical perspective: Labor’s two-party preferred vote is lower than the Coalition’s in the so-called Vietnam election of 1966 (56.9%) and the Dismissal election of 1975 (55.7%), but better than John Howard’s in 1996 (53.6%) and Tony Abbott’s in 2013 (53.5%). The Coalition managed 94 seats in a slightly smaller House of Representatives of 148 (compared to 150 at the 2025 election) in 1996. Labor might also land on 94 this time, once the counting is done.

    For Labor, it is a victory on a scale only rivalled – and indeed slightly overshadowed statistically – by John Curtin’s wartime election in 1943, when Labor gained 49 seats in a House of 74. That was two-thirds of the available seats and perhaps 58% of the two-party preferred vote. (The full distribution of preferences only came in later elections). In 2025, Labor is likely to land on just under 63% of the House.

    Big majorities carry their own headaches, as Labor’s factional wrestling of recent days reminds us. But a big loss is a much worse ordeal for the loser.

    First, there is the problem of finding a leader. He, or she, will be selected from depleted ranks. They will often inherit a demoralised party that will lack belief in its ability to return to office in a single term – allowing that there has been no one-termer in Australian federal politics since the Scullin government (1929-32).

    Sussan Ley, the new Liberal leader, will realise – or should realise – that as a leader elected following such a defeat, her chances of ever making it to the prime ministership are slim.

    Since the second world war, a new leader chosen after a loss of office has never become prime minister. Peter Dutton, who became opposition leader in 2022, joined Billy Snedden (after 1972), Kim Beazley (1996), Brendan Nelson (2007) and Bill Shorten (2013) as those who never went on to lead the country.

    But any leader who slips into the role – either re-elected or for the first time – after a big loss is a long shot to make it. The best example we have from the postwar era is Gough Whitlam, elected leader in February 1967 after one of the biggest landslides in Australian political history, won by Harold Holt at the 1966 election. It is therefore worth revisiting what he did to get there.

    Whitlam biographers such as Graham Freudenberg and Jenny Hocking have offered us a detailed picture of Whitlam’s systematic work on reforming the party and policy as part of his pitch to the people. The Liberals could do worse than think in those terms as they contemplate their rebuild. They have vast work to do on all of those fronts.

    As a party, Labor was a basketcase in 1967. In Victoria, it was dominated by a group of left-wing unionists and members who seemed more concerned with maintaining ideological purity than winning elections. Whitlam taunted them at the state conference in 1967 that “certainly, the impotent are pure”.

    But between 1967 and 1972, Whitlam and his allies – some of them on the left outside Victoria – modernised the party’s structures and rules, and moderated left-wing domination of the Victorian branch. Alongside these reforms came a comprehensive policy overhaul – the formulation of what Whitlam reverentially called “The Program” – drawing on a vast network of experts across the country and the most compelling models from other countries.

    This was paired with a redesign of the party’s image that helped it win back a vast number of voters at the 1969 election, culminating in the remarkable, election winning “It’s Time” campaign in 1972.

    It was a six-year effort, and it was far from easy. But it is perhaps the best modern example we have of what a shattered party needs to do to win back office.

    Labor faced similar challenges after 1975 and, although the process was messier, Bob Hawke’s eventual election in March 1983 owed much to a process of reform of Labor party, policy and image led by Bill Hayden between 1977 and 1983. This time, it was the Queensland branch of the party – Hayden’s own – that needed an overhaul, which it received through federal intervention of the kind applied to Victoria a decade before.

    Labor also worked out a Prices and Incomes Accord with the union movement, designed to avoid many of the economic and political problems experienced by Whitlam in government, such as runaway inflation. Hayden, like Whitlam before him, crafted an electable opposition. Hawke, however, reaped the benefit after he replaced Hayden on the eve of the 1983 campaign.

    There are lessons here for the Liberals. First, they can no longer avoid party reform. Their post-election reviews of recent times often read like Gothic tales: indeed, I could recommend the Western Australian one after the 2021 state election only to those with stomachs capable of standing up to slasher movies.

    Second, the 2025 election revealed a Coalition policy wasteland. Some, such as the idea of a nuclear power plants across the country, were daft. Others, like cuts to the fuel excise for a year – coinciding with a decline in petrol prices – were dross. Others again simply made it appear the Coalition was making it up as it went along. It would be hard to conceive of anything further removed from the best examples we have of policy rebuilding by shattered parties.

    Finally, there are the people. Who, exactly, are the Liberals trying to win over? From May 2022, Dutton seemed to have his eye on Labor voters in the outer suburbs, but he did very little that was likely to win them over. He did even less to win over groups who have turned decisively away from the Liberals in recent years, such as women and the young.

    Whatever efforts they made to win over the so-called multicultural communities, such as Chinese-Australian voters, were undone by clumsy messaging from the ministerial ranks about “spies”. In the end, it often seemed that Dutton – and possibly also most of the survivors of 2022 – didn’t have their hearts in appealing to the kinds of voters who had turned to the teals, Labor and Greens in 2022. They preferred to commune with their own.

    The impotent are still pure: the Liberals emerge from the 2025 campaign unsullied by a dalliance with strangers. They now have their reward. Whether a party organisation with branches dominated by the ideologue, the conservative, the elderly and the eccentric can act as an instrument for forging a new electoral alliance of the kind that set up the party in the 1940s for decades of success must be considered doubtful. There is no Robert Menzies on the horizon. And there is no Liberal movement speaking a language of progress rather than reaction.

    This is the greatest crisis faced by Australia’s centre right since 1943 – and we can be certain that, unlike Ben Chifley, Anthony Albanese won’t do his opponents the favour of trying to nationalise the banks.

    Frank Bongiorno does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    – ref. Political parties can recover after a devastating election loss. But the Liberals will need to think differently – https://theconversation.com/political-parties-can-recover-after-a-devastating-election-loss-but-the-liberals-will-need-to-think-differently-232695

    MIL OSI Analysis – EveningReport.nz –

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Anonymous tip off resulted in child abuse material offences – East Arnhem region

    Source: Northern Territory Police and Fire Services

    On 7 May 2025, an anonymous report was received via Crime Stoppers detailing a complaint that someone was allegedly distributing and in possession of child abuse material in an East Arnhem Region community.

    Following initial investigations, the Katherine Criminal Investigation Branch travelled to the remote community on Monday to execute a search warrant at the alleged offender’s residence. Throughout the search, investigators seized multiple storage devices and a mobile device which contained child abuse material.

    The 31-year-old male was arrested and has since been charged with:

    • Transmit Child Abuse Material – 474.22(1) Commonwealth Criminal Code Act
    • Possess/Produce Child Abuse Material – 125B Criminal Code Act NT x 6

    He was remanded to appear in Darwin local Court on Thursday 15 May 2025.

    Major Crime Detective, Senior Sergeant Justene Dwyer said “I commend the Katherine Criminal Investigation Branch investigators, local East Arnhem Region police members and Aboriginal Liaison Officers for their diligence and attention to detail to ensure this man is put before the courts.

    “This behaviour is not accepted in our community and police will continue to go above and beyond to arrest anyone responsible for harming children in the NT community.”

    Members of the public who have any information about people involved in child abuse and exploitation are urged to call police on 131 444 or Crime Stoppers on 1800 333 000. You can also submit a report online at https://crimestoppers.com.au/.

    You can also make a report online by alerting the Australian Centre to Counter Child Exploitation via the ‘Report Abuse’ button at www.accce.gov.au/report.

    MIL OSI News –

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Green Budget: Early Childhood Education for Everyone

    Source: Green Party

    The Green Party has unveiled its new plan to make Early Childhood Education (ECE) free.

    “This is about making ECE for everyone,” says Green Party co-leader, Marama Davidson.

    “Every child deserves the best possible start in life. However, ECE costs are a huge stress and barrier for many families.

    “Families in Aotearoa face some of the highest ECE costs in the world. A lot of families pay around $10,000 a year per child – making ECE the biggest household cost after housing for many.

    “One of the main reasons for this is corporate greed. Too much money meant for our children disappears into corporate profits, while parents pay sky-high fees and teachers earn far too little.

    “Our plan makes ECE accessible for whānau while enhancing the quality of care our tamariki receive.

    “We will initially cap charges at $10 per day per child on top of the current 20-hour free entitlement. This represents a significant shift from the $12 an-hour some families currently pay. By 2029, we will make ECE free by raising the entitlement to 35 hours a week.

    “This is what ECE can look like when we put our kids first and push aside the corporate greed that is dominating the sector.

    “A large portion of the Government’s funding for ECE goes straight into the pockets of for-profit chains. These for-profit providers benefit from hundreds of millions in public subsidies while charging high fees and paying low wages to teachers which impacts upon the quality of care. Teacher’s working conditions are our children’s learning conditions.

    “Our Budget covers the full cost of delivering quality ECE, ending subsidies to corporations and instead supporting community-based and public centres that prioritise the needs of our kids, not the interests of shareholders.

    “With a Green Government, whānau will have the confidence that their tamariki are receiving quality care, without huge costs,” says Marama Davidson.

    MIL OSI New Zealand News –

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Green Budget for a country worth fighting for

    Source: Green Party

    The Green Budget shows how much better our lives could be under a Green Government, instead of one dominated by corporate greed.

    “This is a Budget for a country that belongs to and works for New Zealanders,” says Green Party co-leader Chlöe Swarbrick. 

    “We believe in fairness and common sense. A Green Government will rapidly reduce emissions, reduce the cost of living and improve our quality of life.

    “That means free GP visits, free Early Childhood Education, free dental care, an Income Guarantee to ensure no one falls below the poverty line, housing for all, a stable climate, clean air, clean water and clean soil.

    “We can do this by taxing the wealthiest fairly.

    “Or, we can continue to let our infrastructure crumble, kids go hungry and the healthcare system teeter on the edge of collapse, as the Government promises for their Budget next week.

    “These are political choices. The Greens choose a country worth fighting for, instead of the Luxon Government’s choices seeing New Zealanders leaving in record numbers.

    “The Aotearoa we all deserve is entirely within our grasp. Our Green Budget is the detailed map, and in the coming weeks, we will be working with communities across Aotearoa to start our journey to making it a reality,” says Chlöe Swarbrick. 

    MIL OSI New Zealand News –

  • MIL-OSI China: UN eyes reform to modernize itself ahead of 80th anniversary

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    The United Nations General Assembly convened an informal plenary meeting on Monday to hear a briefing from Secretary-General Antonio Guterres on the UN80 Initiative, a wide-ranging reform effort launched as the UN approaches its 80th anniversary of founding.

    The UN80 Initiative, introduced in March, aims to modernize the operations of the 193-member body. The reform focuses on identifying efficiencies and improvements within existing frameworks, reviewing how member states’ requests are carried out, and exploring changes to the agency’s structure, said Guterres.

    The changes are expected to yield “meaningful reductions” in the overall budget, said Guterres. The departments for political and peacekeeping affairs could see a 20 percent reduction in staff by eliminating duplication, according to UN.

    The financial strain on the organization is already apparent. As of May, just 1.8 billion U.S. dollars of the 3.5 billion dollars in regular budget assessments for 2025 has been received, which represents a shortfall of roughly 50 percent, according to data from the Fifth Committee of the UNGA.

    Fu Cong, China’s permanent representative to the UN, said his expectation of this reform initiative is to advance institutional renewal and efficiency enhancement. “This is a task of great importance, and the Secretary-General must exercise strict oversight. China hopes the reform will deliver concrete results.”

    “As the world enters a new period of turbulent transformation marked by rising unilateralism and multiplying global challenges, the role of the United Nations must be reinforced, not diminished,” Fu said.

    It is essential to uphold the authority and status of the United Nations, he said. He added that reform must strengthen rather than weaken the organization.

    “The more complex and volatile the international situation becomes, the more important it is to support the UN in playing its central role and to safeguard the international system with the UN at its core. This must remain the fundamental direction and ultimate goal of the reform, and should be firmly upheld,” the Chinese envoy said.

    “A more streamlined, efficient, responsive, financially accountable, and influential United Nations is in the interest of all parties,” he said.

    As reform concerns the interests of all member states, “it is imperative to enhance transparency, strengthen consultation with member states, build the broadest possible consensus, conduct comprehensive and prudent evaluations, and make responsible decisions,” he added.

    “Reform must not be used as an excuse for the UN to do less or even nothing, nor should it become a justification for certain countries to shirk their financial obligations,” Fu emphasized.

    He stressed that the legitimate interests of developing countries must be fully safeguarded. Their representation and voice must be effectively enhanced. “This is key to the success of the reform,” he said.

    “It is unacceptable for the interests of a few countries to override those of other member states, or for the legitimate rights and interests of the vast number of developing countries to be sacrificed to meet the demands of a minority,” he said.

    Guterres and his predecessors have faced challenges in trying to reform the organization over the past decades. The UN has been criticized for heavy bureaucracy, slow decision-making, and fragmented coordination among agencies. The UN is also heavily dependent on voluntary contributions from member states, which leads to unpredictable funding.

    Abbas Kadhom Obaid, permanent representative of Iraq to the UN, speaking at Monday’s meeting on behalf of the Group of 77 and China, expressed “deep concern” over the dire liquidity situation of the UN.

    He noted that “one single member state, which is also the only beneficiary of the maximum ceiling on the scale of assessments, continues to be responsible for more than 90 percent of arrears to the regular budget.”

    Obaid pointed out that any proposal aimed at achieving efficiencies by reducing duplications and redundancies across the UN system “should not aim at dismantling UN agencies and funds, to the detriment of due support to member states.”

    “We emphasize that any reforms foreseen under this initiative must preserve, first and foremost, the multilateral and inclusive nature of the United Nations, while also avoiding strategy-driven models that may ultimately compromise the effectiveness of our organization, particularly with regard to the implementation of its multiple mandates approved by member states,” he said.

    He added that for small states, a strong and effective multilateral system, underpinned by respect for the UN Charter and international law, is not an option but an existential necessity.

    Burhan Gafoor, permanent representative of Singapore to the UN, speaking on behalf of the Small States Group (SSG), said the world is witnessing a period of geopolitical tension, economic fragmentation and rising nationalism. “We are deeply concerned by the erosion of respect for international law and by efforts to reverse economic integration and globalization,” he said.

    The UN is facing a significant budget shortfall as the United States and other donors scale back humanitarian aid and multilateral funding. U.S. President Donald Trump’s administration’s proposed budget for fiscal year 2026 includes deep cuts to foreign aid, with signals that U.S. contributions to the UN system could be nearly eliminated.

    Richard Gowan, UN Director at the International Crisis Group, warned in April that the UN may face a 20 percent budget reduction in 2026 due to donor cuts and unpaid member contributions, The New York Times reported.

    In February, Trump signed an executive order calling for a review of U.S. engagement with the UN and withdrew from agencies focused on human rights, reproductive health, climate change, and global health. Other UN donors, including the United Kingdom, are also reducing humanitarian spending.

    MIL OSI China News –

  • MIL-Evening Report: NZ celebrates Rotuman as part of Pacific Language Week series

    By Grace Tinetali-Fiavaai, RNZ Pacific journalist

    Aotearoa celebrates Rotuman language as part of the Ministry for Pacific Peoples’ Pacific Language Week series this week.

    Rotuman is one of five UNESCO-listed endangered languages among the 12 officially celebrated in New Zealand.

    The others are Tokelaun, Niuean, Cook Islands Māori and Tuvaluan.

    This year’s theme is, ‘Åf’ạkia ma rak’ạkia ‘os fäega ma ag fak Rotuma – tēfakhanisit Gagaja nā se ‘äe ma’, which translates to, ‘Treasure & teach our Rotuman language and culture — A gift given to you and I by God’.

    With fewer than 1000 residents identifying as Rotuman, it is the younger generation stepping up to preserve their endangered language.

    Two young people, who migrated to New Zealand from Rotuma Island, are using dance to stay connected with their culture from the tiny island almost 500km northwest of Fiji’s capital, Suva, which they proudly call home.

    Kapieri Samisoni and Tristan Petueli, both born in Fiji and raised on Rotuma, now reside in Auckland.

    Cultural guardians
    They are leading a new wave of cultural guardians who use dance, music, and storytelling to stay rooted in their heritage and to pass it on to future generations.

    “A lot of people get confused that they think Rotuma is in Fiji but Rotuma is just outside of Fiji,” Samisoni told RNZ Pacific Waves.

    Rotuman Language Week.        Video: RNZ Pacific

    “We have our own culture, our own tradition, our own language.”

    “When I moved to New Zealand, I would always say I am Fijian because that was easier for people to understand. But nowadays, I say I am Rotuman.

    “A lot of people are starting to understand and realise . . . they know what Rotuma is and where Rotuma is, so it is nice saying that I am Rotuman,” he said.

    Samisoni moved to New Zealand in 2007 when he was 11 years old with his parents and siblings.

    He said dancing has become a powerful way to express his identity and honour the traditions of his homeland.

    Learning more
    “Moving away from Fiji and being so far away from the language, I think I took it for granted. But now that I am here in New Zealand, I want to learn more about my culture.

    “With dance and music, that is the way of for me to keep the culture alive. It is also a good way to learn the language as well.”

    For Petueli, the connection runs deep through performance and rhythm after having moved here in 2019, just before the covid-19 pandemic.

    “It is quite difficult living in Aotearoa, where I cannot use the language as much in my day to day life,” Petueli said.

    “The only time I get to do that is when I am on the phone with my parents back home, or when I am reading the Rotuman Bible and that kind of keeps me connected to my culture,” he said.

    He added he definitely felt connected whenever he was dancing.

    “Growing up, I learnt our traditional dances at a very young age.

    Blessed and grateful
    “My parents were always involved in the culture. They were also purotu, which is the choreographers and composers for our traditional dances. So, I was blessed and grateful to have that with me growing up, and I still have that with me today,” he said.

    Celebrations of Rotuman Language Week first began as grassroots efforts in 2018, led by groups like the Auckland Rotuman Fellowship Group Inc before receiving official support from the Ministry for Pacific Peoples in 2020.

    Interview with Fesaitu Solomone.      Video: RNZ Pacific

    The Centre for Pacific Languages chief executive Fesaitu Solomone said young people played a critical role in this movement — but they don’t have to do it alone.

    “Be not afraid to speak the language even if you make mistakes,” she said.

    “Get together [and] look for people who can support you in terms of the language. We have our knowledge holders, your community, your church, your family.

    “Reach out to anyone you know who can support you and create a safe environment for you to learn our Pasifika languages.”

    Loved music and dance
    She said one of the things that young people loved was music and dance and the centre wanted to make sure that they continued to learn language through that avenue.

    “It is great pathway and we recognise that a lot of our people may not want to learn language in a classroom setting or in a face to face environment,” she said.

    Fesaitu said for these young leaders, the bridge was already being crossed — one dance, one chant, and one proud declaration at a time.

    “And that is the work that we try and do here, is to look at ways that our young people can engage, but also be able to empower them, and give them an opportunity to be part of it.”

    Petueli hopes other countries follow the example being set in Aotearoa to preserve and celebrate Pacific languages.

    “I do not think any other country, even in Fiji, is doing anything like this, like the Pacific languages [weeks], and pushing for it.

    “I think we are doing a great job here, and I hope that we will everywhere else can see and follow through with it.”

    This article is republished under a community partnership agreement with RNZ.

    MIL OSI Analysis – EveningReport.nz –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Schatz, Coons Lead Group Of 27 Senators In Introducing Resolution To Condemn $400 Million Airplane Gift To Trump From Qatar

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Hawaii Brian Schatz

    WASHINGTON – U.S. Senators Brian Schatz (D-Hawai‘i) and Chris Coons (D-Del.), members of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, today introduced a resolution in the Senate condemning a luxury airplane gift, valued at $400 million, President Donald Trump announced he will receive from the government of Qatar. According to reports, Trump intends to designate the plane as Air Force One while in office and then transfer it to a foundation for personal use following the end of his term. In addition to Schatz and Coons, the resolution is cosponsored by Democratic Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) and U.S. Senators Cory Booker (D-N.J.), Chris Murphy (D-Conn.), Jon Ossoff (D-Ga.), Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), Patty Murray (D-Wash.), Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), Alex Padilla (D-Calif.), Jacky Rosen (D-Nev.), Mark Warner (D-Va.), Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.), Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.), Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.), Mazie K. Hirono (D-Hawai‘i), Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), Michael Bennet (D-Colo.), Gary Peters (D-Mich.), Lisa Blunt Rochester (D-Del.), Elissa Slotkin (D-Mich.), Angus King (I-Maine), Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), Tammy Duckworth (D-Ill.), Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), Angela Alsobrooks (D-Md.), and Andy Kim (D-N.J.).

    “Air Force One is more than just a plane — it’s a symbol of the presidency and of the United States itself,” said Senator Schatz. “Any president who accepts this kind of gift, valued at $400 million, from a foreign government creates a clear conflict of interest, raises serious national security questions, invites foreign influence, and undermines public trust in our government. We are asking the Senate to vote to reiterate a basic principle: no president should use public service for personal gain through foreign gifts.”

    “President Trump’s penchant for corruption and grift has risen to a new level with the news his presidency is for sale – if you happen to have $400 million dollars,” said Leader Schumer. “This Qatari plane deal would be the largest Presidential bribe in modern history and it’s not just naked corruption, it’s a grave national security threat. Senate Republicans may bury their heads in the sand while Trump tries to enrich himself and his billionaire buddies, but Senate Democrats are going to stand up for the American people and say enough is enough – we condemn this attempt at corruption and gross violation of the Constitution.”

    “We wouldn’t trust another country to decorate the Oval Office, to set up our Situation Room, or to wire the White House briefing room, so why would we let another country build Air Force One for us, which is an airborne version of all three? This isn’t just a massive act of corruption, it’s a national security risk of the highest order,” said Senator Coons, Ranking Member of the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Defense. “If President Trump is so willing to put his own administration in danger for the sake of a $400 million gift, imagine how much danger he’s willing to put the American people in.”

    “While Republicans plot to gut vital services like Social Security and Medicaid and unleash economic uncertainty onto hardworking Americans, Donald Trump is planning to accept a luxury jet, valued at $400 million, from a foreign government,” said Senator Booker. “This not only creates a clear conflict of interest, raises serious national security concerns, and undermines public trust in our government, but is a slap in the face to the people across the country who are struggling to make ends meet. All Senators should be able to agree that no one should use public service for personal gain through foreign gifts. I hope my Republican colleagues will support this resolution.”

    “The president doesn’t get to trade U.S. foreign policy and national security for a private jet,” said Senator Murphy. “This resolution sends the message Trump won’t: the Oval Office is not for sale.”

    “No, Donald Trump cannot accept a $400 million flying palace from the royal family of Qatar. Not only is this farcically corrupt, it is blatantly unconstitutional,” said Senator Sanders. “Congress must not allow this over-the-top kleptocracy to proceed.”

    “President Trump wants to accept a $400 million private jet from a foreign government, have American taxpayers pay to retrofit it as Air Force One, and then keep it for himself to jet around the world as soon as he leaves office. It’s hard to imagine more brazen corruption or a clearer violation of our Constitution’s Emoluments Clause, and there’s no question this outlandish proposal puts our country’s national security at risk,” said Senator Murray. “Every member of Congress should support this simple resolution condemning violations of the Emoluments Clause and making clear Trump cannot accept a $400 million private jet from Qatar without explicit consent from Congress.”

    “If someone came to one of my town halls in Oregon and tried to argue that getting a $400 million jet from the government of Qatar wasn’t corruption, they would be laughed out of town,” said Senator Wyden. “Instead of securing new allies against adversaries like China or opening new markets for American products, Trump is using America’s clout to get a private jet. It’s corruption plain and simple that fritters away American influence and leaves us weaker.” 

    “While Republicans in Congress are working to gut Medicaid and Social Security, President Trump is brazenly accepting a luxury jumbo jet from Qatar — for his use during and after he leaves office,” said Senator Padilla. “Once again, Trump is showing us that he puts his own interests above those of the American people, benefiting himself and leaving working families behind. This foreign gift reeks of corruption, is blatantly against the law, threatens our national security, and will cost taxpayers tens of millions in retrofit costs and security upgrades.”

    “Donald Trump is accepting a multimillion dollar plane from a foreign government as a personal gift, while clearly ignoring the Constitution,” said Senator Rosen. “Trump gets richer off of his position while hardworking families suffer from his reckless actions. This is corruption plain and simple, and I’m supporting this resolution to make our strong opposition clear.”

    “This is corruption plain and simple. The President of the United States accepting a $400 million plane from a foreign government is unheard of, and would require direct consent from Congress,” said Senator Warner. “This is just the latest act by President Trump that shows his administration has no regard for the rule of law and is ripe to be exploited by foreign actors.”

     “Trump’s brazen willingness to accept a luxury jet from Qatar raises the dangerous prospect that the president can be bought and paid for by foreign powers — putting their interests over Americans’ and our national security. Every Senator should join us in rejecting it and blocking the sale of the presidency to the highest bidder,” said Senator Van Hollen.

    “Our founding fathers knew that we must protect ourselves from corruption and foreign influence, which is exactly why we have a constitutional provision prohibiting presidents from accepting lavish gifts from foreign governments—a super luxury Boeing 747-8 jumbo jet, reportedly valued at $400 million, is no exception,” said Senate Foreign Relations Committee Ranking Member Shaheen. “Congress and the American public have a right to know the details of any arrangement that calls into question whether the President is acting on behalf of American interests and American interests alone. Further, the security implications of taking a foreign-owned and managed plane and outfitting it with the most sensitive U.S. technology continues to demonstrate a lack of judgement in this administration when it comes to guarding U.S. intelligence.”

    “There’s no such thing as a $400 million “no-strings-attached” gift,” said Senator Duckworth. “This is the mother of all bribes. It puts our national security in jeopardy and erodes public trust—all for the President’s own personal gain. Donald Trump wants to sell our foreign policy and sell out our people.”

    “Donald Trump accepting a $400 million gift from a foreign country is corruption in plain sight,” said Senator Hirono. “Trump’s latest grift undermines our national security, flies in the face of the Constitution, and will cost American taxpayers hundreds of millions, if not billions, in retrofits.”

    “The mere notion that the President would cravenly accept a $400 million attempt to win favor from a foreign power is beyond the pale and reeks of corruption.  The White House and presidency are sacred trusts from the American people, not venues for Trump to enrich himself and his family with shady deals and influence buying,” said Senator Durbin. “Our resolution reaffirms what our Constitution makes clear – no President should receive gifts from a foreign power.”

    “While President Trump claims to target fraud and abuse, his actions continue to prove that his priorities are his own interests and those of his wealthy friends,” said Senator Bennet. “His plan to accept a $400 million luxury jet from the Qatari government for use as Air Force One is an act of blatant corruption and a violation of our Constitution that poses severe counterintelligence risks, needlessly undermining U.S. national security.”

    “This is corruption in plain sight. Under no circumstance should a sitting president be accepting luxury gifts from a foreign government, especially while negotiating an arms sale,” said Senator Blunt Rochester. “This is yet another example of President Trump focusing on enriching himself rather than improving the lives of everyday Americans. I’m joining with my colleagues on this resolution to protect national security, to stand up for our constituents, and to uphold the rule of law.”

    “If an ordinary government official accepted a gift even a fraction as valuable as this, there would be a full investigation, and potential firings due to concerns of foreign influence,” said Senator Slotkin. “Now the President is taking a $400 million foreign gift. Beyond the perception of corruption, the idea that a foreign country would have access to Air Force One, as the buyer, during production, leaves it incredibly vulnerable to bugs, tracking devices, and whatever else they or other countries may attempt to manipulate.”

    “This is corruption, plain and simple. The U.S. is not for sale, and we cannot allow the presidency to be bought by foreign interests,” said Senator Klobuchar.

    “Just when you think the Trump Administration can’t sink to a new low of ethical misconduct, he accepts a luxury jet from a foreign nation. Corruption on full display,” said Senator Merkley.

    “We’re beyond foreign interference at this point. We’re watching a President invite a foreign government to buy him off,” said Senator Alsobrooks. “American values are actively being flushed down the toiled by this corrupt President.”

    “The American public knows this is wrong—especially a gift of this size,” said Senator Kim. “It’s blatant corruption, and the President knows it. Air Force One isn’t just a plane—it’s a secure command center for national security decisions and classified communications and is hardened to ensure the President is protected. Taking a jet from a foreign government is a serious national security risk, and taxpayers will still foot the bill to make it flight ready. This is a dangerous abuse of power, plain and simple.”

    The full text of the resolution is available here.

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Schatz: No President Should Take $400 Million Gift From A Foreign Country

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Hawaii Brian Schatz

    WASHINGTON – U.S. Senator Brian Schatz (D-Hawai‘i), a senior member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, today took to the Senate floor to condemn a luxury airplane gift, valued at $400 million, that President Donald Trump announced he will receive from the government of Qatar. According to reports, Trump intends to designate the plane as Air Force One while in office and then transfer it to a foundation for personal use following the end of his term. Schatz also announced he will be asking for a vote in the Senate to condemn this action.

    “I cannot believe I have to say this, but a president should not take a $400 million gift from a foreign country,” said Senator Schatz. “The Emoluments Clause. It’s a fancy phrase, but a simple idea: No foreign gifts.”

    “Air Force One is not just a random luxury airplane,” continued Senator Schatz. “It is a symbol of — and a projection of — American power… It represents not just the weight of the presidency, but America itself — generations of history and international leadership. But in one fell swoop, Donald Trump is selling out one of the most iconic symbols of American power that we have.”

    “This week, several of my colleagues and I will be asking the Senate to vote to condemn this action,” concluded Senator Schatz. “There should be 100 of us that agree on this fundamental principle: No president should take free stuff from a foreign government. And certainly nothing worth $400 million.”

    The full text of his remarks can be found below. Video is available here.

    I cannot believe I have to say this, but a president should not take a $400 million gift from a foreign country.

    It doesn’t matter which president, what party. It doesn’t matter which foreign country. It doesn’t matter if there is or is not a legal justification. No president should take a $400 million gift from a foreign country.

    I shouldn’t have to explain why — but it is a high principle literally enshrined in the Constitution because people who we have representing us should know, not think, but know, that their representatives are focused on them and this country only, that our loyalties not be divided, that our minds are not wandering elsewhere.

    The Emoluments Clause. It’s a fancy phrase, but a simple idea: No foreign gifts.

    If a foreign government offers you anything — but especially something close to half a billion dollars—the answer is, ‘No, thank you.’ End of story. Very simple. End of story. ‘I cannot take that.’

    First of all, because I cannot take that because I cannot have divided loyalties. I’m going into the region; I cannot take a $400 million gift before I begin negotiations with you. But it is explicitly prohibited by the United States Constitution. And the gift in is that the country of Qatar is going to literally provide a luxury aircraft — not just any luxury aircraft to the President of the United States, but Air Force One.

    And why does this matter? Air Force One is not just a random luxury airplane. It is a symbol of — and a projection of — American power. It has flown 15 different presidents. It carried President John F. Kennedy’s body after his assassination, and saw President Johnson be sworn in under unprecedented circumstances, it rushed President George W. Bush back to Washington after the Twin Towers were struck, and just two years ago, it flew President Joe Biden for a secret trip to Ukraine during the war.

    When people see Air Force One on TV, when they see it land in other countries— whether in London, or Tokyo, or Brazil — they immediately know that America has arrived. It represents not just the weight of the presidency, but America itself — generations of history and international leadership.

    But in one fell swoop, Donald Trump is selling out one of the most iconic symbols of American power that we have, and what people will now see is the most powerful man on Earth flying around in a plane paid for by a foreign government. It is disgusting. It is wildly corrupt. And just because they are doing the corruption in plain sight does not make it any less damning or sad or gross.

    This week, several of my colleagues and I will be asking the Senate to vote to condemn this action. There should be 100 of us that agree on this fundamental principle: No president should take free stuff from a foreign government. And certainly nothing worth $400 million.

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-Evening Report: In Indonesia, Albanese has a chance to reset a relationship held back by anxiety and misperceptions

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Hangga Fathana, Assistant Professor of International Relations, Universitas Islam Indonesia (UII) Yogyakarta

    Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has wasted little time taking his first overseas trip since Labor won a historic victory in Australia’s federal election. He’ll head to Indonesia today to meet the country’s new president, Prabowo Subianto.

    With both nations entering new political chapters, the visit carries symbolic weight. But it will also have practical importance.

    Despite the two nations’ proximity and strengths, the relationship has often been held back by outdated perceptions and strategic hesitation. This is a timely opportunity to reset the relationship.

    Prabowo’s emerging foreign policy

    Prabowo succeeded outgoing President Joko “Jokowi” Widodo in October after a decade of his infrastructure-driven and globally engaged leadership.

    Prabowo, a former army general and defence minister, had projected a populist and nationalist image during his 2024 election campaign. He frequently emphasised Indonesia’s food self-sufficiency, military strength and national sovereignty.

    Since taking office, however, he has moderated his tone. While seen by some in the West as assertive, he has signalled a willingness to strengthen bilateral defence ties with Australia. He also has an interest in modernising Indonesia’s military and engaging more transparently with partners.

    Still, questions remain about how he will shape Indonesia’s foreign policy. This includes whether he will maintain Jokowi’s emphasis on multilateralism and economic diplomacy. Both are key to the tone and outcomes of Albanese’s visit.

    Prabowo’s leadership style is nuanced. Despite his polarising image, Indonesia’s foreign policy is still shaped by pragmatism and non-alignment. As such, Prabowo will likely focus on balancing relations with China, the United States and Russia, while protecting Indonesia’s sovereignty.

    Indonesia’s decision to join BRICS, the economic group that includes both China and Russia, for example, should be seen as a diplomatic hedge, not a new geopolitical alignment.

    Other recent decisions, such as providing aid to Fiji, suggest an increasingly outward-facing regional posture.

    Albanese should offer Prabowo credible alternatives to Russian and Chinese engagement through trade, technology and education exchanges, rather than reacting to Jakarta’s moves with suspicion.

    Opportunities for cooperation

    In his election campaign, Albanese reaffirmed his government’s commitment to working closely with Southeast Asia. He also promised a foreign policy grounded in diplomacy, climate cooperation and economic diversification.

    This provides a strong incentive for both leaders to deepen ties. For Australia, deepening ties with Indonesia supports its Indo-Pacific strategy. The goal: promoting a stable and inclusive regional order, particularly amid concerns over growing strategic competition between the US and China.

    For Indonesia, Australia offers investment, education partnerships, and critical expertise in clean energy and innovation.

    A free-trade agreement signed in 2019 provides a platform for deeper integration and less competition in certain industries.

    For example, there are huge opportunities to collaborate in clean energy, particularly after the neighbours signed a climate partnership last year. The agreement will secure supplies of lithium for Indonesia’s EV battery production, while Australia will gain more export markets for its critical minerals.

    People-to-people ties are also vital, while education remains a longstanding pillar of the bilateral relationship.

    Both countries face skills shortages in key sectors. Indonesia needs skilled workers in health care, clean technology and digital literacy. Australia has shortages in critical infrastructure, aged care and engineering.

    There are good opportunities here for student exchanges, joint employment training programs and other vocational collaborations.

    New Australian university campuses in Indonesia are a positive step, but they remain commercially focused and concentrated in elite, urban areas. With over 4,000 universities across the archipelago, these partnerships could go much further.

    Where tensions might arise

    The relationship is not without friction. Australia’s involvement in the AUKUS agreement, and its close alignment with the United States and United Kingdom, has raised concerns for Indonesia, which has long championed non-alignment.

    Jakarta has voiced unease over the perceived risks of nuclear submarine proliferation in the region.

    Albanese’s visit is a key opportunity to clarify that AUKUS involves nuclear-powered — not nuclear-armed — submarines. He should also reinforce Australia’s commitment to transparency over the deal. This is essential to avoiding misunderstandings and building trust.

    A more recent flashpoint is speculation around a possible Russian military presence in Indonesia — a claim the Indonesian government has firmly denied.

    Indonesia’s response exemplifies its longstanding commitment to strategic autonomy. However, the whole ordeal reveals the complexity of Jakarta’s foreign relations, which often involve balancing ties with competing powers.

    For Australia, acknowledging Indonesia’s independent foreign policy — rather than interpreting it through a great-power rivalry lens — is critical to sustaining mutual trust.

    A chance to re-anchor the relationship

    This moment offers both governments the chance to move beyond symbolic gestures toward a deeper, more inclusive and people-centred partnership.

    Amid global fragmentation, trust is not just desirable — it’s essential. And while differences remain, they are not insurmountable when guided by mutual respect, strategic patience and a commitment to genuine cooperation.

    For Australia, the challenge is to move past strategic anxiety and invest in a resilient, multidimensional relationship with Indonesia. This visit could be the first step in doing just that.

    Hangga Fathana does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    – ref. In Indonesia, Albanese has a chance to reset a relationship held back by anxiety and misperceptions – https://theconversation.com/in-indonesia-albanese-has-a-chance-to-reset-a-relationship-held-back-by-anxiety-and-misperceptions-256321

    MIL OSI Analysis – EveningReport.nz –

  • MIL-OSI United Nations: Peacekeeping Ministerial: Member States rally behind UN peacekeeping in a time of crisis

    Source: United Nations – Peacekeeping

    “Complex demands and diminishing resources are testing the limits of the current peacekeeping approaches,” warned Johan Wadephul, Germany’s Minister for Foreign Affairs at the 2025 Peacekeeping Ministerial in Berlin today. UN and Member State representatives met to discuss the future of peacekeeping, calling for reforms to strengthen its effectiveness and efficiency.

    The meeting comes as peacekeeping faces mounting challenges: Conflicts worldwide have reached their highest levels since World War II, becoming increasingly complex and dangerous. Member States responsible for setting peacekeeping mandates have become more divided.

    An investment in peace

    Despite the challenges, “every UN peacekeeping [mission] is a good investment,” said Minister Wadephul. “We want UN blue helmets to remain this instrument of peace protecting millions of civilians and monitoring ceasefires.

    Missions have proven effective in preventing violence before it starts, reducing it during conflicts, and preventing its recurrence once conflicts end. Their presence also directly reduces civilian casualties. Peacekeepers have helped many countries achieve durable peace, including Cambodia, Côte d’Ivoire, El Salvador, Liberia, Namibia, Mozambique, Sierra Leone and Timor-Leste.

    Bigger challenges, fewer resources

    Despite its track record, investment in peacekeeping is declining. Currently, just over 70,000 civilian, military and police peacekeepers are working to advance peace in 11 operations globally, serving countries including the Democratic Republic of Congo, Lebanon, and Cyprus. In comparison, the city of Berlin alone has a police force of 26,000.

    Peacekeeping’s current US$5.6 billion budget is roughly half what it was a decade ago. It represents just 0.5% of global military spending.

    This funding comes from all UN Member States, with wealthier countries contributing larger shares. Even for the United States – peacekeeping’s largest donor – their assessed contribution of $1.5 billion makes up just 0.2% of their 2024 defence budget.

    Yet many Member States are behind on their payments, owing a total of $2.7 billion and worsening the funding crisis.

    “It is absolutely essential that all Member States meet their financial obligations by paying their contributions in full and on time,” António Guterres, Secretary-General of the United Nations.

    Adapting to a new reality

    UN officials and Member States called for comprehensive reforms to adapt to these realities.

    Tailoring missions to local contexts, creating more focused mandates, increasing local ownership were suggested as ways peacekeeping missions could strengthen operations. Allowing for a more flexible use of resources was raised as critical to helping missions find efficiencies. There were also impassioned calls for stronger political backing for peacekeeping missions, including from the Security Council.

    “We have political divisions impacting everything we are trying to achieve as a team,” said General Birame Diop, Senegal’s Minister of Armed Forces.

    Making peacekeeping fit for the future

    Today, the message from UN Member States was clear: for the people peacekeepers serve, it is essential to use limited resources as effectively and efficiently as possible, ensuring missions continue their vital work.

    “The value of peacekeeping is undeniable… but there is always more to do,” said Catherine Pollard, UN Under-Secretary-General for management Strategy, Policy and Compliance.

    Discussions will continue tomorrow, with specialized sessions that will look at how these calls for reform can be concretely met.

    MIL OSI United Nations News –

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Addressing New Zealand’s infrastructure asset management challenge

    Source: NZ Music Month takes to the streets

    The Government has launched a new work programme to improve public infrastructure asset management, Infrastructure Minister Chris Bishop says.

    “We need to be honest about the fact that we’ve done asset management poorly in the public sector for decades. We rank fourth to last in the OECD for asset management, with a number of government agencies reporting non-compliance with Cabinet expectations relating to depreciation funding, asset management plans and asset registers. The public sector performs poorly compared with the private sector.

    “Poor asset management results in expensive renewals and emergency works, poor infrastructure quality, asset failures, and less funding for new services. The Infrastructure Commission estimates that for every $40 spent on new infrastructure, we should be investing $60 in maintenance and renewals.

    “In practice, years of poor asset management means leaky hospitals and schools, mould in police stations and courthouses, service outages on commuter rail, and poor accommodation for Defence Force personnel and their families. It’s not good enough. New Zealanders deserve better.

    “To ensure we get the most out of every dollar we invest, Cabinet has agreed to an all-of-Government work programme that will improve central government asset management and performance, with a focus on infrastructure. 

    “The objective of the programme is to strengthen the infrastructure system to lift asset performance and service outcomes for New Zealanders, ensure there is adequate investment in planned asset maintenance and renewal activities, ensure new investment decisions can be made within the overall context of agencies’ asset management plans, and improve accountability, capability, and oversight of our infrastructure. 

    The work programme will be broken up into two phases: 

    Phase One (short term improvements), including:

    • Continued work to update to the Better Business Case (BBC) and Gateway frameworks.
    • Self-assessment of New Zealand policy and institutional settings against the IMF Public Investment Management Assessment framework.
    • Improved asset management and long-term planning performance indicators and guidance – providing more detailed guidance on expected asset management and long-term planning practice, including which indicators will provide Ministers, stakeholders and the public with confidence that agencies are delivering value for money.
    • Supporting the growth of a “Community of Practice” to build capability – the Infrastructure Commission is partnering with Āpōpō to build a ‘community of practice’ through collaborative events for public service asset management professionals.
    • A possible national Underground Asset Register – officials are providing advice on opportunities to scale the Wellington City Council underground asset register for use across New Zealand.

    Phase Two (beyond December 2025):

    Phase two will consider more fundamental changes to system settings to ensure that asset management outcomes improve, and will include:

    • The development of the 30-year National Infrastructure Plan (NIP) to ensure greater stability of infrastructure priorities that help New Zealand plan, fund and deliver important infrastructure. As part of their work developing this plan, the Infrastructure Commission will recommend system changes to strengthen investment and asset management outcomes.
    • Investigating legislative requirements for the development of ten-year investment plans by capital intensive agencies and performance reporting requirements.
    • A refresh of the Cabinet Office circular CO (23) 9, to give effect to broader changes across the IMS and restate Cabinet’s expectations on investment planning, assurance, and asset management practices. The refresh of the Circular will be undertaken in parallel with the NIP, to allow the refreshed Circular to take into account the NIP recommendations.

    “The draft 30-year National Infrastructure Plan is expected to be published in June this year and it will then go out for public consultation.

    “I intend to consider proposed recommendations from the Infrastructure Commission as part of the Government’s response to the Plan in 2026.

    “Making improvements to our investment management system will ensure New Zealanders’ infrastructure investments are well-managed. These improvements will enable greater economic growth and deliver efficient infrastructure which will have long-term impacts on the cost-of-living,” Mr Bishop says.

    MIL OSI New Zealand News –

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Speech to Apōpō Congress: Addressing New Zealand’s infrastructure asset management challenge

    Source: NZ Music Month takes to the streets

    Good morning. It’s great to be here – in spirit – at the 2025 Apōpō Congress.
    I am a fierce proponent of asset management, and I also enjoy the Te Pae Convention Centre, so it’s a shame I can’t be there with you all in person. 
    I’d like to thank Apōpō for hosting this congress and for keeping the conversation on asset management learnings and best-practice going for over 75 years.
    Better asset management is key to the success of the Government’s plan to go for economic growth and enhance New Zealanders’ quality of life.
    Asset management may not be the sexiest aspect of the infrastructure system – as it has to compete with new, big, and exciting projects – but everyone knows, if you don’t paint the weatherboards on your house, the wood will rot. 
    And billion-dollar infrastructure is fundamentally no different.
    Looking after what we have means our infrastructure will last longer, be more reliable, and be more resilient to shocks and stresses. For me, good asset management is a minimum requirement, not an optional extra.
    So, today I am announcing a comprehensive work programme that Cabinet has agreed to that will improve asset management practice across central government. 
    The aim of this work is to provide safer, longer lasting and more reliable infrastructure services; and to achieve better value for money by making the most of what we have.
    But before I get into that, let me briefly touch on my six infrastructure priorities and where the Government is at on each of them. 
    My six priorities as Minister for Infrastructure
    Last year, I mapped out what I want from the infrastructure system.
    I want the private sector to invest and build here, because they are confident in the pipeline and are enabled to get on with it by an efficient and fair consenting system. 
    And I want the public to enjoy infrastructure that is safe, reliable, accessible, and good value for money. 
    To achieve this, I’m focused on six priorities as Infrastructure Minister:

    Establishing National Infrastructure Funding and Financing Ltd,
    Developing a 30-year National Infrastructure Plan,
    Improving infrastructure funding and financing,
    Improving the consenting framework,
    Improving education and health infrastructure, and last but not least –
    Strengthening asset management.

    These priorities are in response to what the coalition Government has heard from industry and infrastructure experts, both in New Zealand and overseas.
    National Infrastructure Funding and Financing Ltd
    Let’s start with National Infrastructure Funding and Financing, which we call NIFFCo. 
    On the 1st of December last year, we established NIFFCo to:

    Act as the Crown’s ‘shopfront’ to facilitate private sector investment in infrastructure – including receiving and evaluating Market Led Proposals.
    Partner with agencies, and in some cases, local government, on projects involving complex procurement, alternative funding mechanisms, and private finance – including Public Private Partnerships (PPPs).
    Administer central government infrastructure funds.

    NIFFCo has already started lifting the government’s commercial capability and has deployed expertise into agencies that are working on complex Public Private Partnership (PPP) projects including the Northland Road of National Significance and Christchurch Men’s Prison. 
    Off the back of the New Zealand Infrastructure Investment Summit, NIFFCo has also started engaging with domestic and international debt and equity markets to help connect New Zealand projects to suitable capital.
    Developing a 30-year National Infrastructure Plan
    Now, let’s move to my second priority, the 30-year National Infrastructure Plan.
    The industry has asked for a long-term plan and pipeline so that they can invest in people and equipment. We have heard them, it’s the right thing to do, and we are doing it.
    The New Zealand Infrastructure Commission is developing the Plan, which will outline an independent and expert view on New Zealand’s infrastructure needs over the next 30 years, planned investments over the next 10 years, and recommendations on priority projects and reforms that can fill the gap between what we have and what need.
    The draft plan is on track to go out for public consultation next month, with the final plan due to me by the end of this year. 
    I encourage you to provide feedback on the Plan, particularly in the areas of asset management. 
    Improving infrastructure funding and financing 
    Now, let’s talk about my third priority, Improving infrastructure funding and financing. 
    Public infrastructure in New Zealand has historically been primarily funded by taxpayers or ratepayers. 
    But our heavy reliance on this blunt approach is not serving New Zealand well and has led to perverse outcomes including congestion, run-down assets, and the unresponsive provision of enabling infrastructure – contributing to unaffordable housing.
    Last year, we released a suite of new and improved frameworks and guidance including:

    Treasury’s new Funding and Financing framework,
    The Government’s refreshed PPP policy,
    Strategic Leasing Guidance, and
    Guideline for Market Led Proposals. 

    The collective purpose of these documents is to help the Government use its balance sheet more strategically, apply good commercial disciplines to investment, and be a more sophisticated client of infrastructure. 
    This year I have focused on establishing new funding and financing tools. In February, I announced five specific changes to New Zealand’s funding and financing toolkit to make it easier for councils and central government to provide infrastructure to support urban growth. 
    I won’t cover all of these, but the most relevant to people here, is that we are shifting away from Development Contributions to a new Development Levy System that will enable council to fully recover the costs of housing growth from growth.
    This change means ratepayers will no longer need to cross subsidise growth to the same extent (if at all) – freeing up rates to go towards maintenance backlogs. 
    The Government is progressing amendments to the Local Government Act 2002 this year, so that Councils will be able to move to the new Development Levy System through their 2027 Long-Term Plan cycle.
    Improving the consenting framework
    Now, let’s move onto my fourth priority, improving the consenting framework. 
    As many of you will know, the resource management system is broken. 
    It achieves the worst of both worlds: it stifles development and fails to protect the environment. In many ways, our currently planning system is one of the root causes of our infrastructure deficit.
    So, we are taking action. 
    In 2023, we repealed the Natural and Built Environment Act and Spatial Planning Act.
    In 2024, we introduced the Fast Track Approvals Act, which provides a one-stop shop for projects with significant regional and national benefits to apply for and access approvals, resource consents, and permits across nine different Acts, all in the one process.
    The Government listed 149 projects in the Act itself, fast-tracking them in the fast-track process. More projects can be referred into the process too.  
    These 149 projects represent up to 55,000 new homes; 180 kilometres of new road, rail, and public transport routes; three gigawatts in additional generation capacity; and multiple mining and aquaculture projects. 
    And this year, the Government is replacing the entire resource management system – 
    We will put a new system in place that is effects based and embraces standardisation, meaning fewer and faster consents. We plan to have the two Acts introduced to Parliament mid-this year. 
    Improving education and health infrastructure
    I won’t go into too much detail of my, fifth priority, improving education and health infrastructure. I will just quickly say that this government is moving towards: 

    More standardised, repeatable designs,
    More modular and staged builds, and
    More strategic procurement – including by using a panel of contractors and partners for large programmes or packages of work.

    Poor asset management practices 
    Now, let’s talk in detail about my sixth priority – strengthening asset management. 
    I think we need to be honest about the fact that we’ve done asset management poorly in central government for decades.
    Too often we see the result of a lack of care in managing the infrastructure assets entrusted to agencies. 
    I can rattle off too many examples of things gone wrong:

    Schools in Auckland with leaking roofs and rotting buildings;
    Half of justice buildings reported to be in “poor” or “very poor” condition;
    Military homes in Waiouru infested with black mould;
    A police custody suite in Hawke’s Bay with so many leaks that the roof had to be covered with plastic tarpaulin; and
    A hospital in Whangārei where the roof leaked when it rained, the surgical wing was on a lean, raw sewage was found seeping into the walls, and – to top it all off – those walls were riddled with asbestos. 

    This is simply not good enough for New Zealanders. 
    It would be comforting to pretend that these are isolated anecdotes of poor outcomes. And it would be easy to say that “all we need is a bit more funding for emergency repairs to plug some leaks and patch up some roofs”. 
    But this pattern of ‘build and forget’ repeats too often for this to be anything other than a systematic issue. 
    And you don’t need to take my word for it. 
    There is a growing analytical evidence base of unacceptable asset management practice:

    New Zealand ranks fourth to last for asset management in the OECD’s infrastructure survey, and
    Several central government agencies do not comply with mandatory requirements set out by Cabinet as outlined in Cabinet Office circular (23) 9 – including requirements related to depreciation funding, asset management plans, and asset registers.

    The contrast between the performance of central government and that of the private sector, regulated utilities, and even local government is also stark. Let’s use the ratio of annual spending on renewals and maintenance, relative to asset depreciation, as a proxy for asset management performance.
    The private sector and local government have ratios of approximately [1] and [0.75] respectively. 
    For central government agencies, this metric is often impossible to measure, because it isn’t being recorded and reported. And where the data does exist, such as for state highways, the results are significantly worse, with a ratio of [0.35].
    These poor asset management practices are undermining this Government’s infrastructure objectives and contributing to our significant infrastructure deficit – which is expected to grow to around $210 billion by 2050.
    Our maintenance and renewal challenge
    In fact, one of the biggest challenges facing New Zealand’s infrastructure sector is the cost and resources needed to repair and replace assets that are wearing out. 
    The Infrastructure Commission tells me that for every $40 spent on new infrastructure, we should be investing $60 in maintenance and renewals.
    If we don’t prioritise and deliver this spending and sort our asset management practices now, our problems are only going to get bigger. 
    This is driven by three macro trends.
    For one, the amount New Zealand needs to spend on asset management will continue to increase as the assets built during the post-war investment boom of the 1950s to 1990s wear out.
    Second, asset management needs will increase in some sectors as demographics change – for example, more focus will be needed on health facilities as our population ages.
    Third, the risks we face from natural hazards will continue to become more acute. New Zealand already ranks second in the OECD in expected annual losses from natural hazards. And asset owners won’t be able to make informed trade-offs between insurance, relocation, and resilience if they don’t have a strong base of asset management practice to build from – including knowing what they own, where it is, what conditions it’s in, and what risks it faces.
    I feel like I am preaching to the choir – but, as you know – it is important to get asset management right.
    And some sectors do get asset management more right than others. 
    For example, regulated utilities like energy perform well due to economic incentives, and regulatory regimes with strong transparency, oversight and audit requirements.
    Taking a step back – regulated utilities, local government, and central government all have different rules and enforcement mechanisms that impact asset performance, with central government holding the regulated and local government sectors to a higher standard than it does itself.  
    The private sector is characterised by oversight through market discipline, economic regulation, and minimum service quality standards.
    Local government has strong legislative requirements for planning and asset management, supported by audit and transparency requirements. For example, the Local Government Act requires reporting on infrastructure spending by category including maintenance and renewal, which is then audited by the Office of the Auditor General.
    In central government we primarily rely on the requirements set through the Cabinet Office circular on Investment Management and Asset Performance in Departments and Other Entities, or, more commonly known as CO (23) 9. 
    External transparency on central government infrastructure (like age, condition, location, and utilisation) is limited at best, making it difficult for the public to be confident that it is being managed appropriately.
    This is a very complex system to fix. There is no single factor or actor that accounts for why central government is struggling so much to manage its assets effectively. 
    To be clear, it’s not that we don’t have hard-working asset management professionals. Because I know we have some brilliant asset managers doing fantastic work. 
    But too many of you are frustrated by a system that simply isn’t set up to empower you to do what is needed.
    In my view, our asset management performance is the result of four complex inter-related issues. 
    First, central government does not treat asset management as a fundamental component of service delivery. Top-down fiscal constraints, changing service expectations and stakeholder pressures mean that asset management is often de-prioritised in favour of new investment or new operating spending. 
    Second, agencies do not have good enough information on their assets. So, decision-makers like agency officials, and Ministers like me lack the information needed to make good decisions and to be held accountable for them.
    Third, governance is weak. Compared to regulated utilities and local government, our systems, processes, and rules for ensuring that asset management is being carried out properly are not strong enough.
    Fourth, visibility and support for asset management is lacking at senior levels within agencies. Nobody in the audience will be shocked to hear me say that awareness, visibility, and support for asset management is often lacking at senior levels. We simply don’t invest enough in our people. This is true in some parts of the private sector and local government, but it is particularly true in central government. 
    Improving central government asset management 
    So, that’s the doom and gloom part over. Let’s get onto how we plan to fix the system. 
    Today, I am excited to announce that Cabinet has agreed to an all-of-Government work programme that will improve central government asset management and performance, with a focus on infrastructure.
    My goal is to provide safer and more reliable infrastructure services to New Zealanders; and to achieve better value for money by making the most of what we have.
    This work programme will take place across two phases. 
    Phase 1 will roll out this year, delivering quick wins that drive real improvements. But that is just the start. Next year, we start on Phase 2, which will deliver more fundamental changes to how we look after our assets.
    Phase 1
    Let’s start with Phase 1. Phase 1 is about providing clarity on what ‘good’ looks like and ensuring that there are better tools to help central government agencies succeed. 
    The Infrastructure Commission has three actions under Phase 1.
    First, the Commission is assessing New Zealand’s investment and asset management settings for central government using the ‘Public Investment Management Assessment’ (PIMA). This international best-practice framework was developed by the IMF in 2015.
    The Commission will release the PIMA ‘self-assessment’ report alongside the National Infrastructure Plan later this year. It will be an invaluable source of evidence on how we can improve our investment systems – more on that soon.
    Second, the Commission will publish detailed guidance that agencies will need to follow on asset management; long-term planning; and related performance, assurance, and accountability indicators.
    At the moment, Treasury sets out high-level investment management and asset performance requirements for departments, Crown entities, and companies listed in Schedule 4A of the Public Finance Act through Cabinet Office circular CO (23) 9. 
    Over and above Cabinet setting clear rules for asset management it is crucial that we help agencies understand how they meet their obligations. Currently, there is limited detailed guidance showing agencies what good looks like. 
    More detailed guidance can help fill this gap and will help agencies to provide useful and consistent information to decision makers and the public – including indicators that will show whether agencies are delivering value for money from their planning and investment activities.
    Third, the Commission is partnering with Āpōpō to build a new ‘community of practice’ that will lift the capability of public service asset management professionals through events.  
    Phase 1 of this work programme, also includes:

    the Treasury continuing work to update their Better Business Case and Gateway Frameworks, and
    Potentially developing a National Underground Asset Register – Officials will provide me advice on opportunities to scale the Wellington City Council’s  underground asset register for use across New Zealand.

    Phase 2
    Phase 2 is about driving more fundamental changes to system settings to ensure that we see sustained improvements in asset management.
    Phase 2 will be informed by the National Infrastructure Plan but will ultimately be implemented through the Government response to the Plan, which I expect will include changes to the Investment Management System.
    The Commission is currently developing the National Infrastructure Plan to ensure greater stability of infrastructure priorities and to help New Zealand plan, fund, and deliver important infrastructure. 
    The Commission has informed me that the Plan will include recommendations on how to strengthen central government’s Investment Management System.
    The Commission are thinking of issues such as: 

    Strengthening the Public Finance Act to require agencies to periodically develop long-term investment plans (including asset management) and strengthening reporting requirements to increase transparency on spending on maintenance and renewals.
    Strengthening non-legislative reporting requirements to improve transparency over asset management outcomes.
    Establishing oversight and review requirements for asset management planning.
    Explicitly incorporating assessments of bottom-up infrastructure needs, including spending on asset management and renewals, into fiscal strategies
    And strengthening incentives for better asset management practice by, for example, linking investment decision making to agency asset management capability or ringfencing depreciation funding. 

    It is important to note that the National Infrastructure Plan is a ‘strategy report’ and is rightly produced independently from Government. 
    As such, I will consider the final recommendations made by the Commission and will implement Phase 2 of the Asset Management Work Programme through the Government’s response to the Plan in 2026.
    Over the next year, the Treasury is also working to update Cabinet Office circular CO (23) 9. The update of CO (23) 9 is a great opportunity to take on evidence and findings from the National Infrastructure Plan to strengthen Cabinet’s expectations on investment planning, assurance, and asset management practices.
    I have asked Treasury officials to consider the findings of the National Infrastructure Plan when updating the Circular.
    But to be clear, all options remain on the table to improve asset management – including changes to the law. 
    Conclusion
    To conclude, I would like to say thank you again for inviting me to speak. 
    Getting asset management right is one of my top priorities as Minister for Infrastructure, and I will need your help to do it.
    The size of the prize is significant – 
    Improving how we look after our assets will improve the lives of New Zealanders through safer and more resilient infrastructure services. It will drive better value for money from our investments – putting downward pressure on the cost-of-living and freeing up funds for other Government priorities.
    Better asset management is also good for economic growth, as higher-quality infrastructure will reduce disruptions, encourage investment, and improve productivity.
    It won’t be a quick fix.
    The challenges we face are deep-rooted and systemic. But they are not insurmountable, if we ambitious enough to take them on, and disciplined enough to overcome them. 
    Thank you. 

    MIL OSI New Zealand News –

  • MIL-OSI Submissions: Australia – Brat to business: Gen Z and Millennials turn bold ideas into business start-ups – CBA

    Source: COmmonwealth Bank of Australia – CBA

    New data shows Millennials and Gen Z continue to be the driving force behind new business in Australia, as CommBank shows support for young entrepreneurs through its sponsorship of AFC Australian Fashion Week.

    New CommBank research shows that Millennials and Gen Z business owners continue to drive Australian entrepreneurship, together accounting for 62 per cent of new business account openings in the last 12 months, with retail trade, personal and business services, and construction being the most popular sectors for these age groups.

    CommBank data shows that Millennials alone made up 49 per cent of new businesses in the year to 31 March 2025, while Gen Z accounted for 13 per cent, Gen X for 27 per cent and Baby Boomers made up 10 per cent of new businesses.

    Looking at Gen Z, retail trade is the second most popular sector for new businesses after construction, while Millennials favour property and business services before construction and retail.

    While the age breakdown of new business transaction account openings has remained fairly steady since the pandemic, it is likely the Gen Z cohort will grow in the coming years as they get older, and other age groups focus on the growth stage of their business.

    The research comes as CommBank announces its sponsorship of the Australian Fashion Council (AFC) Australian Fashion Week which kicked off in Sydney this week, championing young entrepreneurs, First Nations designers, and the Australian creative industry more broadly.

    CommBank Small Business Banking Executive General Manager, Rebecca Warren, said the various headwinds businesses had encountered over recent years did not appear to be dissuading too many younger entrepreneurs.

    “Gen Z and Millennials account for 72 per cent of all new businesses in retail trade, showing younger Australians are willing to pursue their passion despite the challenging environment this sector has faced and continues to tackle,” Ms Warren said.

    “Australian small businesses have dealt with many challenges over the last few years, and their resilience has never been more evident than in the way they’ve been navigating the challenging market, the impacts of the election, tariffs and changes to rates.

    “It is great to see the entrepreneurial spirit in Australia is very much alive, with under 45s continuing to lead on new business start-ups. We are proud to be supporting Australian small business owners achieve their goals, whether they’re just starting out, or growing their business.”

    Recent data from CommBank’s Household Spending Insights Index^ also shows significant gains in Household Goods spending in the year to March were driven by online marketplace and department stores, followed by clothing and furniture stores.

    This year the AFC Australian Fashion Week will have over 30 designers showcasing their collections, including Aje, Romance Was Born, ESSE, Farage, Lee Mathews, NICOL & FORD, and Carla Zampatti. CommBank will be the presenting partner of The Frontier, and First Nations shows Liandra, Ngali, and Joseph & James.

    Kellie Hush, CEO AFC Australian Fashion Week presented by Shark Beauty, said:

    “We are thrilled to have the Commonwealth Bank’s incredible support in 2025. CBA understands how important it is to nurture small and medium businesses in the early stages of growth. The business of fashion continues to be an exciting but challenging industry, which is why Australian Fashion Week must continue to grow and support the industry. AFC Australian Fashion Week 2025 will showcase a diverse, creative, and a distinctly Australian fashion spirit.

    “The fashion industry is also a major employer of women in Australia, with 77 per cent of our industry being women. The figure makes fashion one of the few professional industries dominated by women, providing opportunity for them to flourish and finesse their specialisations.”

     

    ^CommBank Household Spending Insights (HSI) Index for March 2025, released on 11 April 2025. Full report can be accessed here: https://www.commbankresearch.com.au/apex/researcharticleviewv2?id=a0NDo000000wJLh

    Note about the research: Figures in this media release are based on CommBank Business Transaction Account openings between 1 April 2024 and 31 March 2025. The term Gen Z refers to those born between 1997 and 2012; Millennial refers to individuals born between 1981 and 1996; Gen X refers to those born between 1965 and 1980; Baby Boomer refers to those born between 1946 – 1964.

    MIL OSI – Submitted News –

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Local News – Many hands help Porirua planting work

    Source: Porirua City Council

    Porirua City’s streamside planting programme is going from strength to strength, with the successful planting of hundreds of thousands of native plants since the initiative launched in 2021.
    This year the aim is to get 165,000 more plants in the ground to help filter sediment running into our waterways and encourage biodiversity in the wetland environment.
    Work this year will also include plants going in to protect hills in the Porirua catchment from erosion.
    So far work by Council staff, contractors, volunteers and school groups since 2021 has seen 359,000 native plants successfully put in the ground across more than 127 sites in the Porirua Harbour catchment.
    “It’s heartening to see how many people show up, especially groups who turn out on a regular basis year after year, to help with this big and important piece of work,” says Porirua Mayor Anita Baker.
    “The vision to restore our harbour, Te Awarua-o-Porirua, and our waterways, takes a long time and a lot of work to achieve.”
    With winter on the way, planting season is nearing and there will be opportunities for the public to get out and support planting work in the city.
    There are also local volunteer groups organising their own planting, weeding and litter pick-up events around Porirua.
    The first Council-run community planting day for the year will be held at Cannons Creek Lake on Saturday 24 May, 9.30am-12pm, in partnership with Ngahere Korowai.
    There will be a special Matariki planting event at Bothamley Park on Friday 20 June between 10.30am-1pm, where 1900 plants are due to go in the ground.
    The Council-run community planting days will wrap up in August with an event in Papakōwhai on Saturday 16 August, 10.30am-1pm. This event will be the biggest one, with 3000 plants set to go in the ground in the wetland area across from the Papakōwhai Reserve.

    MIL OSI New Zealand News –

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Local News – Free Youth events in Porirua

    Source: Porirua City Council 

    Youth Week 2025 is happening between 19-23 May and as Porirua has one of the country’s youngest populations, it’s only right that there will be loads of activities for rangatahi.
    This year the nationwide theme of Youth Week is ‘Take Our Place – Whai Wāhitanga’. The theme was chosen by Aotearoa young people and those who work with young people.
    There will be plenty on offer in Porirua, from a street art competition, to sports, laser tag, free kai, health and wellbeing activities, and a jam session.
    “With about 35 per cent of Porirua residents aged 24 and under, one of our big priorities is to keep tamariki and rangatahi at the heart of this city,” says Porirua Mayor Anita Baker.
    “Porirua City is working with local youth-focused organisations such as Partners Porirua and the 502 to make these great events possible.”
    The week starts with a focus on hauora/health with a free event from 1.30pm on Monday 19 May at Te Whare Rangatahi o 502, 3 Cobham Court, organised by Partners Porirua and the 502.
    A Rangatahi Voices for Change Workshop will be held at Pātaka Art + Museum on Tuesday 20 May from 10am-3.30pm. This workshop offers advocacy training for rangatahi – provided by Te Whatu Ora, the Cancer Society and the Regional Kai Network Advocacy Group. Registration is required.
    Te Rauparaha Arena will be brimming with sporting activities on Wednesday 21 May as part of a Sports Day, running from 11.30am-3.30pm. Try your hand at something new, impress your mates with some ball skills, or bring your togs and pop a manu!
    The week wraps up on Friday 23 May with a Jam Session happening from 12-4pm at Cobham Court, where you’ll find a free clothes swap, gaming and VR setups, basketball, market stalls, and lots of prizes and giveaways.
    For more info and other events visit: poriruacity.govt.nz/youth-week

    MIL OSI New Zealand News –

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: New Zealanders take 3 million overseas trips – Stats NZ media and information release: International travel: March 2025

    Source: Statistics New Zealand

    New Zealanders take 3 million overseas trips – 14 May 2025 – New Zealand residents arrived back from 3.01 million short-term overseas trips (of less than 12 months) in the March 2025 year, according to data released by Stats NZ today.

    March 2025 is the first annual period to exceed 3 million arrivals by New Zealand-resident travellers since March 2020 (3.05 million), and was up from 2.84 million in the March 2024 year.

    “The number of short-term overseas trips by New Zealand residents climbed 6 percent in the March 2025 year, compared to the year before,” international travel spokesperson Sarah Drake said.

    “The increase was mainly driven by more trips to Australia, as well as Indonesia, China, and Japan.”

    Files:

    MIL OSI New Zealand News –

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: New bait to control feral cats shows promise

    Source: Police investigating after shots fired at Hastings house

    Date:  14 May 2025

    Feral cats are widespread in New Zealand and have a major impact on our unique native wildlife (such as birds, lizards and bats), as well as spreading diseases like toxoplasmosis. Currently there are limited methods to control feral cats over the large areas where they roam.

    As part of the Predator Free 2050 programme, the Department of Conservation (DOC) has been working in partnership with pest control solutions manufacturer, Orillion, to develop a meat sausage bait for application by aircraft for more widespread control of feral cats. DOC is running field trials to test the bait’s effectiveness.

    In the first aerial trial last spring, DOC researchers sowed the baits by helicopter over 5000 ha in the St James Conservation Area in North Canterbury. Just one 18 gm sausage was used per hectare or rugby field-sized area.

    The results of this field trial are looking promising, says DOC National Eradication Team Manager Stephen Horn.

    “We monitored a sample of feral cats fitted with GPS-VHF collars and nine out of ten cats in the trial area quickly found the baits and were killed.

    “We also used a grid of 50 cameras to monitor the presence of feral cats before and after the baiting. We detected cats 63 times before the operation and just once after.”

    Monitoring through the St James trial also showed stoat and ferret activity declined to very low levels after the operation, most likely from eating baits.

    A second trial at Macraes Flat in Otago, which was recently completed, has shown similar results with 100 per cent (11 out of 11) of monitored cats dying, Stephen says.

    “It’s exciting – after several years of bait development these trials take us a step closer to being able to register the new bait for wider use.

    “A new tool to target feral cats will be a game changer for protecting our vulnerable wildlife, which is found nowhere else in the world.”

    The trials involved two applications of bait – the first without toxin to cue feral cats to the sausages and the second using sausages containing small amounts of 1080 (sodium fluoroacetate). They build on earlier research showing the sausage baits are highly attractive to feral cats and not attractive to most native species such as kiwi or to deer.

    DOC will carry out a further trial in forested habitat this year. The risk of baits to taonga species like tuna/eel and kea will also be assessed. The results of this work will inform DOC’s application to the Ministry for Primary Industries and Environmental Protection Authority to register the meat bait.

    Once registered, DOC plans to use the bait to help remove feral cats from Auckland Island as part of an ambitious plan to eradicate all pests, including feral pigs and mice from this large subantarctic nature reserve. These pests threaten hundreds of native species and have decimated albatross and other seabird populations on the island.

    DOC is also working on a second sausage bait using the registered toxin PAPP (para-aminopropiophenone) to directly control stoats. Initial hand-laid field trials show this bait is highly effective. Aerial trials will be carried out this year.

    The sausage baits are part of broader work to research and develop new tools and techniques to help achieve New Zealand’s ambitious goal of becoming predator free by 2050.

    Background information

    Feral cats are found throughout New Zealand in a range of habitats from the coast to alpine areas. They are opportunistic and skilled hunters and prey on native birds, bats and lizards. They have a significant impact on some threatened species such as kea, kakī/black stilt and pukunui/southern New Zealand dotterel.

    Contact

    For media enquiries contact:

    Email: media@doc.govt.nz

    MIL OSI New Zealand News –

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Environment – Greenpeace slams Govt for failure to commit to protecting rivers

    Source: Greenpeace

    Greenpeace Aotearoa is slamming the Government after Parliamentary Under-Secretary for RMA Reform, Simon Court, refused yesterday to commit to upholding Water Conservation Orders, which protect lakes and rivers.
    Speaking at the Environmental Defence Society’s annual conference, Simon Court refused to answer whether the Government would uphold existing Water Conservation Orders for rivers, as well as National Environmental Standards, under the Government’s RMA reforms.
    Greenpeace spokesperson Will Appelbe says, “Everyone should be able to swim in and fish from New Zealand’s lakes and rivers without getting sick. But nearly half of New Zealand’s rivers are unsafe for swimming, and many are unsuitable for food gathering. Water conservation orders are meant to protect significant waterways – the ones that are still in a good state – and ensure that they aren’t also destroyed.
    “That’s why it is deeply concerning to hear a member of the government refuse to commit to upholding the very limited protections we have for fresh water in Aotearoa.
    “The primary polluter of fresh water in Aotearoa is the intensive dairy industry. It has polluted lakes, rivers, and drinking water with excess nitrate contamination, as a result of the overuse of synthetic nitrogen fertiliser. And their excessive water takes have sucked rivers dry in order to irrigate dairy paddocks.”
    “Now, the government wants to allow the intensive dairy industry to pollute the few waterways that have been identified for special protection. This is a government that is letting polluters write the policy, and going against the interests of everyday New Zealanders who just want to be able to swim in their local river.”
    “With a government that is overturning every freshwater protection that exists in order to please the dairy industry, it’s more important than ever that local governments – like Environment Canterbury, who have responsibility over the majority of New Zealand’s freshwater ecosystems – step up and take real action to protect lakes, rivers, and drinking water.”
    “That means phasing out synthetic nitrogen fertiliser, and not allowing any new dairy conversions or intensifications to take place.”
    “People across the country are standing up for better protection for lakes, rivers, and drinking water. If the politicians won’t take action, then they should expect resistance.”

    MIL OSI New Zealand News –

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: PSA welcomes alternative Green Budget which restores funding to the public service

    Source: PSA

    The PSA is welcoming the Green Party alternative Budget which underlines the importance of properly funding the public service to support New Zealanders, in contrast to the Government’s destructive cuts.
    The Green Budget, released today, reinstates funding to the public service including areas the Government has sharply cut and underfunded – primary health care, Oranga Tamariki and public housing.
    “The Green Party has taken a principled position to restore funding to the public service after the Government’s damaging cuts and the principle of settling pay equity claims so women are paid fairly,” said Fleur Fitzsimons National Secretary for the Public Service Association for Te Pūkenga Here Tikanga Mahi.
    “This Budget makes the right choices in terms of supporting a public service that can deliver to the needs of New Zealanders today and tomorrow and acknowledging the role of women in the public service.”
    The PSA was consulted on the Budget unlike the Government’s rushed changes to pay equity.
    “As we have seen with cuts to the health workforce, to community organisations supporting vulnerable children, and the gutting of Kāinga Ora, to name a few examples, there have been significant impacts on frontline services.
    “Women have borne the brunt of these job cuts, making up 62% of the public service and now the dismantling of the pay equity framework will further disadvantage women.
    “This speaks to the Government’s priorities. It made a choice to cut taxes for landlords, big tobacco and others instead of properly funding the public service, and paying women fairly – the chickens are coming home to roost – the Green Budget would change that and the PSA welcomes its approach.”
    The Public Service Association Te Pūkenga Here Tikanga Mahi is Aotearoa New Zealand’s largest trade union, representing and supporting more than 95,000 workers across central government, state-owned enterprises, local councils, health boards and community groups.

    MIL OSI New Zealand News –

  • MIL-OSI Global: As US ramps up fossil fuels, communities will have to adapt to the consequences − yet climate adaptation funding is on the chopping block

    Source: The Conversation – USA – By Bethany Bradley, Professor of Biogeography and Spatial Ecology, UMass Amherst

    Salt marshes protect shorelines, but they’re already struggling to survive sea-level rise. John Greim/LightRocket via Getty Images

    It’s no secret that warming temperatures, wildfires and flash floods are increasingly affecting lives across the United States. With the U.S. government now planning to ramp up fossil fuel use, the risks of these events are likely to become even more pronounced.

    That leaves a big question: Is the nation prepared to adapt to the consequences?

    For many years, federally funded scientists have been developing solutions to help reduce the harm climate change is causing in people’s lives and livelihoods. Yet, as with many other science programs, the White House is proposing to eliminate funding for climate adaptation science in the next federal budget, and reports suggest that the firing of federal climate adaptation scientists may be imminent.

    As researchers and directors of regional Climate Adaptation Science Centers, funded by the U.S. Geological Survey since 2011, we have seen firsthand the work these programs do to protect the nation’s natural resources and their successes in helping states and tribes build resilience to climate risks.

    Here are a few examples of the ways federally funded climate adaptation science conducted by university and federal researchers helps the nation weather the effects of climate change.

    Protecting communities against wildfire risk

    Wildfires have increasingly threatened communities and ecosystems across the U.S., exacerbated by worsening heat waves and drought.

    In the Southwest, researchers with the Climate Adaptation Science Centers are developing forecasting models to identify locations at greatest risk of wildfire at different times of year.

    Knowing where and when fire risks are highest allows communities to take steps to protect themselves, whether by carrying out controlled burns to remove dry vegetation, creating fire breaks to protect homes, managing invasive species that can leave forests more prone to devastating fires, or other measures.

    The solutions are created with forest and wildland managers to ensure projects are viable, effective and tailored to each area. The research is then integrated into best practices for managing wildfires. The researchers also help city planners find the most effective methods to reduce fire risks in wildlands near homes.

    Wildland firefighters and communities have limited resources. They need to know where the greatest risks exist to take preventive measures.
    Ethan Swope/Getty Images

    In Hawaii and the other Pacific islands, adaptation researchers have similarly worked to identify how drought, invasive species and land-use changes contribute to fire risk there. They use these results to create maps of high-risk fire zones to help communities take steps to reduce dry and dead undergrowth that could fuel fires and also plan for recovery after fires.

    Protecting shorelines and fisheries

    In the Northeast, salt marshes line large parts of the coast, providing natural buffers against storms by damping powerful ocean waves that would otherwise erode the shoreline. Their shallow, grassy waters also serve as important breeding grounds for valuable fish.

    However, these marshes are at risk of drowning as sea level rises faster than the sediment can build up.

    As greenhouse gases from burning fossil fuels and from other human activities accumulate in the atmosphere, they trap extra heat near Earth’s surface and in the oceans, raising temperatures. The rising temperatures melt glaciers and also cause thermal expansion of the oceans. Together, those processes are raising global sea level by about 1.3 inches per decade.

    Adaptation researchers with the Climate Adaptation Science Centers have been developing local flood projections for the regions’ unique oceanographic and geophysical conditions to help protect them. Those projections are essential to help natural resource managers and municipalities plan effectively for the future.

    Researchers are also collaborating with local and regional organizations on salt marsh restoration, including assessing how sediment builds up each marsh and creating procedures for restoring and monitoring the marshes.

    Saving salmon in Alaska and the Northwest

    In the Northwest and Alaska, salmon are struggling as temperatures rise in the streams they return to for spawning each year. Warm water can make them sluggish, putting them at greater risk from predators. When temperatures get too high, they can’t survive. Even in large rivers such as the Columbia, salmon are becoming heat stressed more often.

    Adaptation researchers in both regions have been evaluating the effectiveness of fish rescues – temporarily moving salmon into captivity as seasonal streams overheat or dry up due to drought.

    In Alaska, adaptation scientists have built broad partnerships with tribes, nonprofit organizations and government agencies to improve temperature measurements of remote streams, creating an early warning system for fisheries so managers can take steps to help salmon survive.

    Managing invasive species

    Rising temperatures can also expand the range of invasive species, which cost the U.S. economy billions of dollars each year in crop and forest losses and threaten native plants and animals.

    Researchers in the Northeast and Southeast Climate Adaptation Science Centers have been working to identify and prioritize the risks from invasive species that are expanding their ranges. That helps state managers eradicate these emerging threats before they become a problem. These regional invasive species networks have become the go-to source of climate-related scientific information for thousands of invasive species managers.

    The rise in the number of invasive species projected by 2050 is substantial in the Northeast and upper Midwest. Federally funded scientists develop these risk maps and work with local communities to head off invasive species damage.
    Regional Invasive Species and Climate Change Network

    The Northeast is a hot spot for invasive species, particularly for plants that can outcompete native wetland and grassland species and host pathogens that can harm native species.

    Without proactive assessments, invasive species management becomes more difficult. Once the damage has begun, managing invasive species becomes more expensive and less effective.

    Losing the nation’s ability to adapt wisely

    A key part of these projects is the strong working relationships built between scientists and the natural resource managers in state, community, tribal and government agencies who can put this knowledge into practice.

    With climate extremes likely to increase in the coming years, losing adaptation science will leave the United States even more vulnerable to future climate hazards.

    Bethany Bradley receives funding from the US Geological Survey as the University Director of the Northeast Climate Adaptation Science Center.

    Jia Hu has receives funding from the US Geological Survey as the University Director of the Southwest Climate Adaptation Science Center.

    Meade Krosby receives funding from the US Geological Survey as the University Director of the Northwest Climate Adaptation Science Center.

    – ref. As US ramps up fossil fuels, communities will have to adapt to the consequences − yet climate adaptation funding is on the chopping block – https://theconversation.com/as-us-ramps-up-fossil-fuels-communities-will-have-to-adapt-to-the-consequences-yet-climate-adaptation-funding-is-on-the-chopping-block-256307

    MIL OSI – Global Reports –

  • MIL-OSI China: Full Text: President Xi’s keynote speech at the opening ceremony of the fourth ministerial meeting of the China-CELAC Forum

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    Full Text: President Xi’s keynote speech at the opening ceremony of the fourth ministerial meeting of the China-CELAC Forum

    BEIJING, May 13 — Chinese President Xi Jinping on Tuesday delivered a keynote speech at the opening ceremony of the fourth ministerial meeting of the China-CELAC (the Community of Latin American and Caribbean States) Forum.

    The following is the full text of the speech:

    Writing a New Chapter in Building

    A China-LAC Community with a Shared Future

    Keynote Address by H.E. Xi Jinping

    President of the People’s Republic of China

    At the Opening Ceremony

    Of the Fourth Ministerial Meeting of the China-CELAC Forum

    Beijing, May 13, 2025

    Your Excellency President Gustavo Petro,

    Your Excellency President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva,

    Your Excellency President Gabriel Boric,

    Your Excellency President Dilma Rousseff,

    Delegates of CELAC Member States,

    Ladies and Gentlemen,

    Friends,

    It gives me great pleasure to meet so many old and new friends from Latin American and Caribbean (LAC) countries in Beijing. On behalf of the Chinese government and people, I extend a warm welcome to you all.

    In 2015, LAC delegates and I attended the opening ceremony of the First Ministerial Meeting of the China-CELAC Forum in Beijing, which marked the launch of the China-CELAC Forum. Ten years on, with dedicated nurturing of both sides, the Forum has grown from a tender sapling into a towering tree. This fills me with deep pride and satisfaction.

    Although China and the LAC region are geographically distant, the bonds of our friendship stretch back through centuries. As early as in the 16th century, Nao de China, or “Ships of China,” laden with friendship, shuttled across the Pacific, marking the dawn of interactions and exchanges between China and the LAC region. From the 1960s onward, as New China established diplomatic ties with some LAC countries, exchanges and cooperation between the two sides became closer and closer. Since the turn of the century and in particular in recent years, China and LAC countries have ushered in a historic era of building a shared future.

    We stand shoulder to shoulder and support each other. China appreciates the long-standing commitment of LAC countries that have diplomatic ties with China to the one-China principle. China firmly supports LAC countries in pursuing development paths suited to their national conditions, safeguarding sovereignty and independence, and opposing external interference. In the 1960s, mass rallies and demonstrations took place across China in support of the Panamanian people’s rightful claim to sovereignty over the Panama Canal. In the 1970s, during the Latin American campaign for 200-nautical-mile maritime rights, China voiced its resolute and unequivocal support for the legitimate demands of developing countries. For 32 consecutive times since 1992, China has consistently voted for the United Nations (U.N.) General Assembly resolutions calling for an end to the U.S. embargo against Cuba.

    We ride the tide of progress together to pursue win-win cooperation. Embracing the trend of economic globalization, China and LAC countries have deepened cooperation in trade, investment, finance, science and technology, infrastructure, and many other fields. Under the framework of high-quality Belt and Road cooperation, the two sides have implemented more than 200 infrastructure projects, creating over a million jobs. The China-LAC satellite cooperation program has set a model for high-tech South-South cooperation. The inauguration of Chancay Port in Peru has established a new land-and-sea connectivity link between Asia and Latin America. China has signed free trade agreements with Chile, Peru, Costa Rica, Ecuador, and Nicaragua. Last year, trade between China and LAC countries exceeded US$500 billion for the first time, an increase of over 40 times from the beginning of this century.

    We unite in tough times to conquer challenges through mutual support. China and LAC countries have collaborated on disaster prevention, mitigation and relief and on joint response to hurricanes, earthquakes and other natural disasters. Since 1993, China has dispatched 38 medical teams to the Caribbean. When the pandemic of the century struck, China was among the first to offer assistance to LAC countries, providing over 300 million doses of vaccines and nearly 40 million units of medical supplies and equipment, and sending multiple teams of medical experts. All this helped protect the lives of hundreds of millions across the region.

    We uphold solidarity and coordination and rise to global challenges with resolve. Together, China and LAC countries champion true multilateralism, uphold international fairness and justice, advance global governance reform, and promote multipolarization of the world and greater democracy in international relations. We have worked together to address global challenges like climate change, and advance progress in global biodiversity governance. China and Brazil jointly issued a six-point common understanding on the political settlement of the Ukraine crisis, which has been endorsed by more than 110 countries, contributing our wisdom and strength to resolving international hotspot issues.

    Facts have shown that China and LAC countries are advancing hand in hand as a community with a shared future. This community of ours is founded upon equality, powered by mutual benefit and win-win, invigorated by openness and inclusiveness, and dedicated to the people’s well-being. It exhibits enduring vitality and holds immense promise.

    Distinguished Delegates,

    Friends,

    The century-defining transformation is accelerating across the globe, with multiple risks compounding one another. Such developments make unity and cooperation among nations indispensable for safeguarding global peace and stability and for promoting global development and prosperity. There are no winners in tariff wars or trade wars. Bullying or hegemonism only leads to self-isolation. China and LAC countries are important members of the Global South. Independence and autonomy are our glorious tradition. Development and revitalization are our inherent right. And fairness and justice are our common pursuit. In the face of seething undercurrents of geopolitical and bloc confrontation and the surging tide of unilateralism and protectionism, China stands ready to join hands with our LAC partners to launch five programs that advance our shared development and revitalization, and contribute to a China-LAC community with a shared future.

    The first is Solidarity Program. China will work with LAC countries to support each other on issues bearing on our respective core interests and major concerns. We must enhance exchanges in all fields, and strengthen communication and coordination on major international and regional issues. In the next three years, to facilitate our exchanges on national governance best practices, China will invite 300 members from political parties of CELAC member states every year to visit China. China supports the efforts by LAC countries in increasing their influence on the multilateral stage. We will work with LAC countries to firmly safeguard the international system with the U.N. at its core and the international order underpinned by international law, and to speak with one voice in international and regional affairs.

    The second is Development Program. China will work with LAC countries to implement the Global Development Initiative. We will resolutely uphold the multilateral trading system, ensure stable, unimpeded global industrial and supply chains, and promote an international environment of openness and cooperation. We should foster greater synergy between our development strategies, expand high-quality Belt and Road cooperation, and bolster cooperation in traditional areas such as infrastructure, agriculture and food, and energy and minerals. We should expand cooperation in emerging areas such as clean energy, 5G telecommunications, the digital economy and artificial intelligence, and carry out the China-LAC Science and Technology Partnership. China will increase imports of quality products from LAC countries, and encourage its enterprises to expand investment in the LAC region. We will provide a RMB66 billion yuan credit line to support LAC countries’ development.

    The third is Civilization Program. China will work with LAC countries to implement the Global Civilization Initiative. We should uphold the vision of equality, mutual learning, dialogue, and inclusiveness between civilizations, and champion humanity’s common values of peace, development, fairness, justice, democracy, and freedom. We should enhance China-LAC civilizational exchanges and mutual learning, including through a conference on China-LAC inter-civilizational dialogue. We should deepen cultural and artistic exchanges and cooperation, and hold the Latin American and Caribbean Arts Season. We should strengthen exchanges and cooperation in cultural heritage fields such as joint archaeological projects, conservation and restoration of ancient and historic sites, and museum exhibitions. We should also carry out collaborative studies of ancient civilizations and enhance cooperation to combat illicit trafficking of cultural property.

    The fourth is Peace Program. China will work with LAC countries to implement the Global Security Initiative. China supports the Proclamation of Latin America and the Caribbean as a Zone of Peace and the Declaration of Member States of the Agency for the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons in Latin America and the Caribbean. The two sides should cooperate more closely in disaster governance, cybersecurity, counterterrorism, anti-corruption, narcotics control and combating transnational organized crime so as to safeguard security and stability in the region. China will organize law enforcement training programs tailored to the needs of CELAC member states, and do our best to provide equipment assistance.

    The fifth is People-to-People Connectivity Program. In the next three years, China will provide CELAC member states with 3,500 government scholarships, 10,000 training opportunities in China, 500 International Chinese Language Teachers Scholarships, 300 training opportunities for poverty reduction professionals, and 1,000 funded placements through the Chinese Bridge program. We will initiate 300 “small and beautiful” livelihood projects, actively promote vocational education cooperation programs such as Luban Workshop, and support CELAC member states in developing Chinese language education. We will also launch an exhibition of Chinese films and TV programs under The Bond, and work with LAC countries to translate and introduce 10 premium TV dramas and audiovisual programs annually to each other. China will host the China-LAC tourism dialogue with LAC countries. To facilitate friendly exchanges, China has decided to implement a visa exemption for five LAC countries as the first step, and will expand this policy coverage at proper times.

    Distinguished Delegates,

    Friends,

    As an 11th-century Chinese poet wrote, “Life’s greatest joy comes from finding kindred spirits.” Latin America has a similar proverb which goes, “The one who has a friend has a treasure.” No matter how the world changes, China will always stand by LAC countries as a good friend and a good partner. Let us march forward together on our paths toward modernization, working together to write a new chapter in building a China-LAC community with a shared future.

    MIL OSI China News –

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Tiny Titans: Dung beetles take on big job in South Canterbury

    Source: PISA results continue to show more to be done for equity in education

    Date:

    An army of beetles has been released into South Canterbury pastures with a unique call of duty.

    Over the next decade, hundreds of dung beetles will spend their days living in manure in a bid to clean up waterways in the 34 sq. km Barkers Creek catchment.

    They’ll eat, bury and lay eggs in the dung to ensure contaminants don’t pile up in paddocks and risk running into waterways.

    The unexpected weapons for improving soil and water quality have been shipped from a breeding centre in Auckland to the South Canterbury area, which is largely rolling terrain with heavy clay soils.

    Since February last year, they’ve come in batches. The last batch of dung beetles is due to arrive in late May.

    The Barkers Creek Catchment Group Chair, Danette McKeown, said like most environmental mitigations, the dung beetles weren’t a quick fix but rather a long-term solution.

    “We probably won’t know if the beetles have established for a couple of years, and then it’s more like seven years before we’ll know how much impact they are having.”

    The Group was allocated funding by the Ōrāri Temuka Ōihi Pareora (OTOP) Water Zone Committee to purchase the dung beetles, which were being released at ten different farms.

    Danette said she expected farm owners should see a critical population of dung beetles in their paddocks in a few years, and by then, dung should start rapidly disappearing.

    “We’ve picked four species that would be suitable for our soils. We’ve picked the four seasons package, which means we have species of beetles that will be active in spring, summer, winter and autumn.”

    Dung beetles and their role in agriculture

    Each year, cattle, sheep, alpacas, deer and horses deposit more than 100 million tonnes of manure onto our pastures. The more dung piling up in paddocks, the higher the risk of it running into our waterways.

    The dung beetles offer a unique solution:

    • They dine on the manure of these grazing animals before tunnelling beneath it and filling their burrows with balls of dung, in which they lay their eggs.
    • The piles of dung quickly disappear, broken down into the soils below.
    • One dung beetle can bury 250 times its own weight in a night.

    Introduced dung beetles don’t harm native species

    In most parts of the world, the beetles are strongly connected to livestock, but not in New Zealand, as modern farming was only introduced 150 years ago.

    Although we have native beetles, they have adapted to a forest environment and don’t provide any support in processing manure in our pastoral system.

    To combat the gap in our ecosystem, a company in Auckland introduced different species of dung beetles from Africa and Europe to New Zealand for breeding in 2011.

    As our native beetles live in forests, the imported beetles won’t be competing for habitats.

    MIL OSI New Zealand News –

  • MIL-OSI Submissions: New Zealanders take 3 million overseas trips – Stats NZ media and information release: International travel: March 2025

    Source: Statistics New Zealand

    New Zealanders take 3 million overseas trips – 14 May 2025 – New Zealand residents arrived back from 3.01 million short-term overseas trips (of less than 12 months) in the March 2025 year, according to data released by Stats NZ today.

    March 2025 is the first annual period to exceed 3 million arrivals by New Zealand-resident travellers since March 2020 (3.05 million), and was up from 2.84 million in the March 2024 year.

    “The number of short-term overseas trips by New Zealand residents climbed 6 percent in the March 2025 year, compared to the year before,” international travel spokesperson Sarah Drake said.

    “The increase was mainly driven by more trips to Australia, as well as Indonesia, China, and Japan.”

    Files:

     

    MIL OSI –

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Net migration eases to under 30,000 – Stats NZ media and information release: International migration: March 2025

    Source: Statistics New Zealand

    Net migration eases to under 30,000 – 14 May 2025 – New Zealand had a net migration gain of 26,400 in the March 2025 year, according to provisional estimates published by Stats NZ today.

    “The net migration gain of 26,400 in the March 2025 year was well down from a gain of 100,400 in the March 2024 year,” international migration statistics spokesperson Sarah Drake said.

    “The fall in net migration in the March 2025 year was mainly due to fewer migrant arrivals, although departures also rose to a provisional annual record,” Drake said.

    Provisionally there were 149,600 migrant arrivals and 123,300 migrant departures in the March 2025 year, compared with 207,100 migrant arrivals and 106,700 migrant departures in the March 2024 year.

    Files:

    MIL OSI New Zealand News –

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Stats NZ information release: Electronic card transactions: April 2025

    Source: Statistics New Zealand

    Electronic card transactions: April 2025 – 14 May 2025 – The electronic card transactions (ECT) series cover debit, credit, and charge card transactions with New Zealand-based merchants. The series can be used to indicate changes in consumer spending and economic activity.

    Key facts
    All figures are seasonally adjusted unless otherwise specified.

    Values are at the national level and are not adjusted for price changes.

    April 2025 month
    Changes in the value of electronic card transactions for the April 2025 month (compared with March 2025) were:

    • spending in the retail industries was unchanged
    • spending in the core retail industries increased 0.2 percent ($12 million).

    Files:

     

    MIL OSI New Zealand News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Case, Cortez Masto, Ernst, Radewagen Work To Strengthen Strategic Relationships With Pacific Islands

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Ed Case (Hawai‘i – District 1)

    (Washington, D.C) — Today, U.S. Senators Catherine Cortez Masto (D-Nev.) and Joni Ernst (R-Iowa), Congressman Ed Case (D-Hawaii-01), and Delegate Aumua Amata Radewagen (R-A.S.), introduced a bipartisan, bicameral bill aimed at strengthening the United States’ strategic partnerships with Pacific Island nations, supporting sustainable development, and combating the increasing Chinese aggression in the region. The Pacific Partnership Act would help the U.S. establish a clear, comprehensive strategy to support diplomatic, security, and economic relationships in the Indo-Pacific region.

    “Our Pacific Partnership Act responds directly to the reality that our country’s and world’s future lies in the Indo-Pacific, and that the islands of the Pacific are our indispensable partners in charting that future,” said Congressman Case. 

    “The Pacific Islands are under increasingly severe economic, environmental and geopolitical stress, and we must expand our generational engagement to assist them where they most need assistance. The Pacific Partnership Act, molded directly on the Pacific Islands’ own blueprint to their collective future, is our roadmap to expanded engagement as well.”

    “Supporting our allies and partners in the Indo-Pacific is essential to combating the Chinese Communist Party’s influence and to our long-term national security,” said Senator Cortez Masto. “This bipartisan bill is critical to strengthening our ties with our allies in the Pacific and ensuring they become enduring global relationships.”

    “Strengthening America’s partnerships in the Indo-Pacific is critical to deterring Chinese aggression,” said Senator Ernst. “This bipartisan legislation equips us to work with nations in the Pacific that serve as the first line of defense against the Chinese Communist Party and keep Americans safe at home.”

    “Thank you to Senator Cortez Masto, Senator Ernst, and Congressman Case for their focus on these important partnerships that are close to home for my congressional district in the South Pacific,” said Congresswoman Radewagen. “We need sustained U.S. engagement for enduring partnerships in the Pacific Islands, keeping China’s influence in check, and strengthening mutual development opportunities.”

    The U.S. has a longstanding relationship with the Pacific Islands, and they play a crucial role in U.S. national security, facilitating military operations in support of American allies and partners. Nevada – through the National Guard – collaborates with the Republic of Fiji, the Kingdom of Tonga, and the Independent State of Samoa under the National Guard Bureau’s State Partnership Program, strengthening security cooperation globally. 

    The Pacific Partnership Act would strengthen these crucial ties by creating a “Strategy for Pacific Partnership”.

    This strategy, crafted by the President and presented to Congress every four years, would outline U.S. involvement in the Pacific Islands and highlight combined efforts to combat regional challenges including natural disasters, security threats, and economic development. 

    Read the full bill here.

    ###

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Bold science reforms to fuel economic growth

    Source: NZ Music Month takes to the streets

    The Government is moving swiftly to implement the most significant science reforms in three decades, with three new public research organisations to be formed by 1 July, Science, Innovation and Technology Minister Dr Shane Reti announced today.
    “These reforms are about unlocking the full potential of science to deliver stronger economic growth and greater resilience for New Zealand. We’re not wasting a moment,” says Dr Reti. 
    “Earlier this year, the Prime Minister unveiled a major overhaul of the science system, including the move from seven Crown Research Institutes to three new, future-focused entities. These new organisations will concentrate on key areas of national importance.”
    The new institutes will be:

    New Zealand Institute for Bioeconomy Science – advancing innovation in agriculture, aquaculture, forestry, biotechnology and manufacturing; protecting ecosystems from biosecurity threats and climate risks; and developing new bio-based technologies and products.
    New Zealand Institute for Earth Science – supporting energy security and sustainability; developing land, marine and mineral resources; and improving resilience to natural hazards and climate-related risks.
    New Zealand Institute for Public Health and Forensic Science – strengthening public health through disease detection and response; and supporting public safety through forensic science services.

    “These institutes will ensure our world-class researchers are focused on delivering science that drives innovation, supports our industries, and improves the lives of everyday New Zealanders,” says Dr Reti.
    “Critically, the new research organisations will have a strong commercial focus, with a mandate to translate science into real-world outcomes and commercial success. 

    “It’s not enough to have great science — we need that science to power start-ups, lift productivity, and create jobs. This is about turning research into results for New Zealand’s economy.”
    To lead this transformation, Dr Reti today announced the appointment of Barry Harris as Chair of the Bioeconomy Science Institute, and David Smol as Chair of the Earth Science Institute.
    “Both Mr Harris and Mr Smol bring outstanding leadership and deep sector experience. They are well placed to guide these new organisations as they take shape and begin delivering on our vision for a stronger, more productive science system,” says Dr Reti.
    The Institute of Environmental Science and Research (ESR) will retain its current governance as it transitions to become the New Zealand Institute for Public Health and Forensic Sciences.
    “These changes are about focus, outcomes, and value. We are investing in science that delivers for New Zealand — science that strengthens our economy, supports our environment, and builds resilience for the future,” Dr Reti says.
    “I’m confident these new leaders will help us deliver a science system that is more connected, more commercially focused, and better aligned with the needs of our nation.”

    MIL OSI New Zealand News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: May 9th, 2025 Heinrich, Colleagues Urge Trump to Press for Immediate Resumption of Humanitarian Aid to Gaza, Return to Israel-Gaza Hostage & Ceasefire Negotiations

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for New Mexico Martin Heinrich

    WASHINGTON — U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), a member of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, sent a letter to President Trump in advance of the president’s upcoming travel to the Middle East next week, urging him to take an active role in pressing for humanitarian aid and a return to ceasefire negotiations between Israel and Hamas in order to ensure Israel’s security and end more than 15 months of devastating conflict in Gaza.
    When Trump took office, the January 15 ceasefire deal negotiated under the presidential transition of the Biden administration was in effect — 30 Israeli hostages were reunited with their families, Hamas’ military capacity had been effectively obliterated, and humanitarian aid was reaching Gaza. In the months since Trump’s inauguration, however, negotiations towards long-term regional security have collapsed, and dozens of hostages remain imprisoned by Hamas.
    Before next week’s visit, the senators wrote to President Trump that, “The United States is not providing much needed leadership to drive peace forward in the region.” President Trump’s planned visit to the region does not include a stop in Israel.  He has chosen to conclude a truce with Houthi terrorists even as they pledge to continue striking Israel. He also appears to be turning a blind eye towards the core task of ensuring Israel’s security for today and for the long term.
    In the letter, the senators described Gaza’s catastrophic humanitarian crisis under a months-long blockade of aid. More than 116,000 metric tons of food assistance have been stuck outside Gaza, and an estimated 90 percent of Gaza’s population face high levels of acute food and water insecurity. According to the United Nations, most civilians face emergency or crisis levels of hunger.
    This week, Israel also announced its intent to expand military operations and pursue a long-term occupation of Gaza. “The announcement has already escalated tensions in the Middle East, once again threatening to engulf the volatile region in conflict,” the senators wrote. “The Houthis struck Israel’s Ben Gurion airport on May 4 and have vowed to further retaliate against the proposed occupation. Jordan, one of our most important regional security partners, is facing intensifying pressure amid continued public anger over Gaza. Saudi Arabia has made it clear there can be no progress towards normalization with Israel without a pathway toward Palestinian statehood.”
    “Israel’s proposed occupation plans take us further away from permanently ending the Israel-Gaza war and upholding Israel’s security, both goals that you have promised to achieve under your administration,” the senators added.
    Specifically, the senators asked Trump to press all parties to agree to a deal that: 

    Secures the immediate release of all remaining hostages;

    Ushers in a ceasefire;

    Works towards the creation of a security force backed by Arab partners to administer Gaza without Hamas; and

    Creates a path toward a lasting solution that will allow the Israeli and Palestinian people to live in security, dignity, and prosperity.

    The senators ended the letter by reaffirming their unequivocal commitment to Israel’s security and its right to defend itself.  
    “It has been nearly 20 months since Hamas murdered more than 1,200 people and took about 250 hostages, including American citizens,” the senators concluded. “This period has also been marked by severe humanitarian suffering of civilians in Gaza, where more than 52,000 Palestinians have been killed and millions displaced. All of us are longstanding advocates of the U.S.-Israel security partnership, and we will continue to fight for the defense of the Israeli people. That is why, today, we stand with the nearly three-quarters of the Israeli public who are fighting for the release of the remaining hostages in Gaza in exchange for a ceasefire.”
    The letter was is by U.S. Senators Chris Coons (D-Del.), Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.), Jack Reed (D-R.I.), Mark Warner (D-Va.), and Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii). Alongside Heinrich, the letter is signed by U.S. Senators Tammy Baldwin (D-Wis.), Michael Bennet (D-Colo.), Lisa Blunt Rochester (D-Del.), Cory Booker (D-N.J.), Tammy Duckworth (D-Ill.), Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), Mazie Hirono (D-Hawaii), Tim Kaine (D-Va.), Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.), Angus King (I-Maine), Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), Edward Markey (D-Mass.), Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), Patty Murray (D-Wash.), Tina Smith (D-Minn.), Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.), Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Peter Welch (D-Vt.), and Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.).
    The full text of the letter is here and below:
    Dear President Trump:

    When you took office in January 2025, we were on a path to peace in the Israel-Gaza conflict, thanks in part to your team’s efforts during the Presidential transition. A ceasefire was in effect and 30 hostages were reunited with their families. Hamas’s military capacity had been effectively obliterated, with the IDF calling it a “guerilla terror group” that could no longer mount a sustained military operation against the people of Israel – a testament to both Israel’s military prowess and the United States’ unflinching support. But today, the United States is not providing critically needed leadership to drive peace forward, which is why we write to express our deep concern in advance of your upcoming travel to the Middle East.
    Since March of this year, the situation on the ground has deteriorated dramatically. Fighting in Gaza has resumed, negotiations towards long-term regional security have collapsed, and dozens of hostages remain imprisoned by Hamas. In fact, we have not had a single hostage return home since February 26. In addition, we are witnessing a humanitarian catastrophe in the third month of Israel’s full blockade of food, water, and medicine into Gaza. This is the longest closure Gaza has ever faced. While the World Food Program ran out of food stocks inside Gaza on April 25, they report that more than 116,000 metric tons of food assistance – enough to feed one million people for up to four months – has been positioned outside Gaza at aid corridors, unable to enter. According to the United Nations, an estimated 90 percent of Gaza’s population faces high levels of acute food and water insecurity, with most civilians facing emergency or crisis levels of hunger. Against this backdrop, the Israeli government’s new aid proposal is simply not viable. It would limit aid distribution to just a few sites in southern Gaza secured by private U.S. contractors, and nearly all aid groups operating in the region note this would only increase insecurity and displacement. Roughly half of Gaza’s 2.1 million people are children; a generation of starving children today would prevent a secure and peaceful Israel tomorrow.
    This week, the Israeli government announced a plan to expand military operations and pursue a sustained, long-term occupation of Gaza. This is a dangerous inflection point for Israel and the region, and while we support ongoing efforts to eliminate Hamas, a full-scale reoccupation of Gaza would be a critical strategic mistake. The announcement has already escalated tensions in the Middle East, once again threatening to engulf the volatile region in conflict. The Houthis struck Israel’s Ben Gurion airport on May 4 and have vowed to further retaliate against the proposed occupation. Jordan, one of our most important regional security partners, is facing intensifying pressure amid continued public anger over Gaza. Saudi Arabia has made it clear there can be no progress towards normalization with Israel without a pathway toward Palestinian statehood. In this context, Israel’s planned actions would severely undermine Jerusalem’s path to a more secure, stable and regionally integrated future, which you championed in your first term through the Abraham Accords.
    Israel’s proposed occupation plans take us further away from permanently ending the Israel-Gaza war and upholding Israel’s security, both goals that you have promised to achieve under your administration. As such, in advance of your upcoming visit, we urge you to oppose a permanent reoccupation of Gaza and to press for the immediate resumption of neutral and impartial humanitarian assistance, access, and distribution that fully meets the needs of innocent Palestinian civilians in Gaza.
    You also have a unique opportunity to press the parties to agree to a deal that:
    (1) secures the immediate release of all remaining hostages;
    (2) ushers in a ceasefire;
    (3) works towards the creation of a security force backed by Arab partners to administer Gaza without Hamas; and
    (4) creates a path towards a lasting solution that will allow the Israeli and Palestinian people to live in security, dignity, and prosperity.
    Mr. President, like you, we are unequivocal in our commitment to Israel’s right to defend itself. It has been nearly 20 months since Hamas murdered more than 1,200 people and took about 250 hostages, including American citizens. This period has also been marked by severe humanitarian suffering in Gaza, where more than 52,000 Palestinians have been killed and millions displaced. All of us are longstanding advocates of the U.S.-Israel security partnership, and we will continue to fight for the defense of the Israeli people. That is why, today, we stand with the nearly threequarters of the Israeli public who are fighting for the release of the remaining hostages in Gaza in exchange for a ceasefire.

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI Russia: Shortsighted ‘America First’ Policy Will Accelerate US Decline: Chinese Ambassador to Russia Zhang Hanhui

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: People’s Republic of China in Russian – People’s Republic of China in Russian –

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    Moscow, May 13 /Xinhua/ — The U.S. administration’s short-sighted “America First” policy will not only fail to achieve its stated goal of “making America great again,” but will also lead the country into stagflation and accelerate its decline, Chinese Ambassador to Russia Zhang Hanhui said in an opinion piece published in the Russian newspaper Argumenty i Fakty on Tuesday.

    “The US economy has been exposed to stagflation risks for a long time, which has caused serious concern both domestically and in the international community,” the publication says.

    As Zhang Hanhui noted, stagflation in the United States is accompanied by high inflation, a deteriorating labor market, a decline in consumer activity, and a reduction in investment. The article emphasizes that the tariff war will further worsen the country’s economic downturn.

    A Chinese diplomat likens trade protectionism to a boomerang: the more aggressively it is used, the more negative consequences are felt. “Ultimately, the U.S. tariff policy will cause the greatest damage to the American economy itself,” he points out, adding that abrupt and ill-considered changes in government policy have seriously undermined economic expectations in the country.

    All this, according to the author of the article, causes concern and disorientation regarding the prospects of the American economy.

    Zhang Hanhui is confident that the “America First” policy will lead the United States to isolation. “Basically, tariffs are used as a tool to test the loyalty of other countries, acting through a system of threats and punishments. However, as practice shows, in the modern world, pressure and coercion do not bring the desired results. Instead, such actions only push other countries to unite in opposition to American hegemony,” the ambassador explains.

    At the same time, he assured that China is determined to withstand the tariff war with the United States to the bitter end. According to him, despite the eight-year-long Sino-American trade war, the scale of China’s foreign trade continues to grow, having increased from 30 trillion to 43 trillion yuan. In addition, the number of China’s foreign trade partners is also increasing. Zhang Hanhui cites data according to which in 2024, China’s trade volume with countries participating in the Belt and Road initiative increased by 6.4 percent, and the share of new markets, including ASEAN countries, in China’s foreign trade amounted to almost 60 percent. Meanwhile, the share of China’s exports to the United States decreased from about 19.2 percent in 2018 to 14.7 percent in 2024.

    As Zhang Hanhui emphasizes, no matter how unpredictable and reckless the US acts, China will continue to confidently follow its own path, consistently promoting the policy of opening up and supporting the construction of an open world economy.

    “History has repeatedly proven that trade protectionism does not contribute to the improvement of one’s own economy, but on the contrary, seriously undermines the world trading system, provokes global economic crises and ultimately harms both others and oneself. Ignoring the lessons of history inevitably leads to negative consequences,” the article says.

    The Ambassador confirmed China’s readiness to strengthen solidarity and mutually beneficial cooperation with Russia and with all countries that adhere to the principles of honesty and fairness.

    “We will jointly implement multilateralism, promote the improvement of the global governance system, and build a community with a shared future for mankind, so as to make greater contributions to improving the well-being of the peoples of China and Russia, as well as safeguarding world peace and development,” Zhang Hanhui concluded. –0–

    MIL OSI Russia News –

  • Markets decline over 1% on profit booking after record rally

    Source: Government of India

    Source: Government of India (4)

    The Indian stock markets declined on Tuesday as investors opted to book profits following a sharp rally in the previous session. Concerns over the progress of US-China trade talks also contributed to the cautious sentiment, pulling down the benchmark indices after their best performance in over four years.

    The BSE Sensex closed 1,281.68 points, or 1.5 per cent, lower at 81,148.22. The NSE Nifty also slipped, ending the day at 24,578.35, down 346.35 points or 1.39 per cent. The correction came a day after markets soared nearly 4 per cent on easing geopolitical tensions between India and Pakistan. Analysts noted that much of Monday’s gains were driven by short covering, leading to profit booking on Tuesday.

    Despite the weakness in headline indices, broader market indices managed to hold firm. The BSE Midcap index edged up 0.17 per cent, while the BSE Smallcap index rose 0.99 per cent, suggesting some resilience in mid- and small-cap stocks.

    Sectoral performance, however, was mixed. Major indices such as Nifty Auto, Financial Services, FMCG, and IT ended with losses of over 1 per cent. Other segments including Nifty Bank, Metal, Oil and Gas, Realty, and Consumer Durables also ended lower. In contrast, indices tracking PSU banks, media, pharma, and healthcare sectors posted gains, with the Nifty PSU Bank index rising as much as 1.66 per cent.

    Among the Sensex constituents, Infosys was the top laggard, falling 3.57 per cent. Eternal, Power Grid, HCL Technologies and TCS also registered losses ranging between 2.88 per cent and 3.4 per cent. On the other hand, Sun Pharmaceutical, Adani Ports, Bajaj Finance, State Bank of India and Tech Mahindra closed with modest gains of up to 1 per cent.

    Market volatility eased slightly, with the India VIX dipping 1.05 per cent to 18.20. Analysts noted that geopolitical uncertainties remained on investors’ radar, with the fragile ceasefire between India and Pakistan keeping participants cautious.

    “Geopolitical tensions remained in focus as market participants monitored the fragile ceasefire between India and Pakistan, adding to the cautious sentiment,” said Sundar Kewat of Ashika Institutional Equity.

    Ajit Mishra, SVP at Religare Broking Ltd, said the decline reflected a sense of caution despite stable global cues and easing regional tensions. “However, we expect the overall tone to remain positive, given the noticeable support in the 24,400–24,600 zone. The focus should remain on identifying key sectors and themes showing relative strength and using intermediate pauses to accumulate quality stocks,” he added.

    — IANS