Category: Australia

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Positive meeting with ENVA and lead partners on lithium battery fire risk

    Source: Scotland – City of Perth

    I would like to extend my gratitude to ENVA, Police Scotland, the Scottish Fire and Rescue Service, SEPA, and Amey for engaging in open and honest conversations about the issues caused by the disposal of lithium batteries from common household items.

    The meeting was a productive step forward in addressing the concerns raised by our community following the fire at ENVA’s Perth site. We received firm assurances about the significant investment ENVA has been making at Friarton to enhance safety and improve operational efficiency following the 14th January incident. It is clear that ENVA, who took over the site following the previous fire in 2023, recognises the importance of the proximity of both the Friarton Bridge and neighbouring properties, and they are focused on minimising any impact on them,  which is a crucial aspect of our ongoing efforts to ensure the wellbeing of our residents and avoiding disruption to travellers both on M90 Friarton Bridge and locally within Perth itself.

    It was also pleasing to hear from SEPA and Scottish Fire and Rescue Service about the work they have undertaken on site and with ENVA, and be assured that these key agencies have confidence in the way the site is being operated.

    It is clear that ENVA have already learned much from what happened in January and has made additional enhancements to what they had already put in place since acquiring the site. This commitment to learning and willingness to allocate financial resources to the safety improvements is welcome.

    The safe disposal of lithium batteries is a growing problem for all of us. There is much the Council and others can learn from how ENVA is now managing this issue at their Perth site, including embracing new technology to identify and reduce risks. I look forward to discussing this more at a site visit in the near future.

    Thank you once again to all the stakeholders for their commitment to resolving these issues and working collaboratively towards a safer and more sustainable future.

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI: StoneX Unites with Women’s Run Series to Champion Athletics Diversity

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    LONDON, Feb. 21, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — StoneX Financial Ltd, the U.K. based subsidiary of StoneX Group Inc., is proud to continue their partnership with the Women’s Run Series – a pioneering running initiative designed to increase female and ethnic minority participation in athletics. The next event scheduled is on International Women’s Day – Saturday, March 8, 2025 – at the Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park in London, previously a venue for the 2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games.

    Supported by RunThrough, the Women’s Run Series represents a significant step forward in reducing the barriers to participation in athletics, by inspiring an inclusive environment that welcomes runners of all backgrounds.

    Victoria Lepadden, Head of Client Management (Non-Banks) at StoneX Payments, said, “I’m so excited that StoneX and Women’s Run Series have come together to organise the groundbreaking Women’s Run Series. This event ties in so well with our ‘Women in StoneX’ movement. Both StoneX and Women’s Run Series have provided opportunities for women to come together, have fun, and get fit at the same time. I’m delighted to see that the series will be expanding across the country this year, giving more women the chance to join in and help them thrive in a supportive community.”

    Lucy Wood, Race Director at Women’s Run Series, added, “We are thrilled to bring this event to life in partnership with StoneX. This partnership strengthens our commitment to increasing female and ethnic minority participation in running events, ensuring that everyone, regardless of background, feels welcome and supported. Together, we’re creating more opportunities for women to experience the joy of running in an environment designed just for them.”

    For more information about the Women’s Run Series and to register for upcoming events, visit www.womensrunseries.co.uk.

    About StoneX Group Inc.

    StoneX Group Inc., through its subsidiaries, operates a global financial services network that connects companies, organizations, traders, and investors to the global market ecosystem through a unique blend of digital platforms, end-to-end clearing and execution services, high-touch service, and deep expertise. The group strives to be the one trusted partner to its clients, providing its network, products, and services to enable them to pursue trading opportunities, manage market risks, make investments, and improve business performance. A Fortune 100 company headquartered in New York City and listed on the Nasdaq Global Select Market (NASDAQ: SNEX), StoneX Group Inc. and its 4,300+ employees serve more than 54,000 commercial, institutional, and global payments clients, as well as more than 400,000 retail accounts, from more than 80 offices spread across six continents.

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI Australia: TV interview, ABC Afternoon Briefing with Patricia Karvelas

    Source: Australian Government – Minister of Foreign Affairs

    Patricia Karvelas, Host: Minister, welcome to the program.

    Penny Wong, Foreign Minister: Good to be with you, PK.

    Karvelas: Some breaking news, Minister, this afternoon – commercial pilots we are reporting, have been warned of a potential hazard in airspace between Australia and New Zealand, where three Chinese warships are conducting military exercises. Do you have any information to share regarding what is happening here?

    Foreign Minister: This is a Chinese task group that the Deputy Prime Minister has previously spoken about. We are aware of this task group. We are monitoring this task group very closely. It is, as I understand it, operating in international waters. We will be discussing this with the Chinese and we already have at officials’ level, in relation to the notice given and the transparency that is being provided in relation to these exercises, particularly the live fire exercises.

    Karvelas: Can you tell us why Airservices are telling commercial pilots not to fly over the area?

    Foreign Minister: Well, obviously this is an evolving situation, but it would be normal practice where a task group is engaging in exercises for there to be advice given to vessels and aircraft in the area, and Airservices is doing what it should do, which is to give that advice.

    Karvelas: And is there a fear of live fire and how that may affect these commercial flights? Is that, just for our viewers who perhaps don’t understand how these military exercises work, is that what would be exercising the minds of Airservices Australia?

    Foreign Minister: Well, obviously, as I said, this is an evolving situation, but I can talk to you about what the practice is. The practice is that countries, including Australia and others, can conduct military exercises in international waters. The advice to me is that this is what China is doing. When they do conduct those exercises, obviously notice is provided to ensure – that is available to anyone in the area, and that is what Airservices is doing. We do have concerns about the transparency associated with this and the notice, and I certainly will be having a discussion with Foreign Minister Wang about that.

    Karvelas: What will you raise with the Foreign Minister when you meet?

    Foreign Minister: There are many issues that I regularly raise in bilaterals with Foreign Minister Wang. You would anticipate I will cover those, and I will be very clear with him about some of the issues you and I have spoken about, PK.

    Karvelas: Will you press the Foreign Minister and Chinese officials to be more transparent about what this naval task force is doing and also where it is going?

    Foreign Minister: What I would say is that China is operating in international waters, just as Australia and other countries operate in international waters. We always express that all countries should comply with the UN Convention are the Law of the Sea – and that is what we will always be articulating to China and to all others who utilise the maritime commons.

    Karvelas: Some analysts have called this a deliberate show of force by China, which wants to demonstrate it can now easily project power into the Tasman, the South Pacific. Is that a fair assessment?

    Foreign Minister: I think that is a commentary piece that you probably should speak to a commentator about. As the Foreign Minister, what I need to articulate is Australia’s interest and Australia’s interests are in transparency and the observance of international law including the law of the sea. That is what we always articulate, for example, in relation to the South China Sea.

    Karvelas: New Zealand’s Defence Minister, Judith Collins, says the task force is a wake-up call for her country and should remind its citizens their geographical isolation no longer offers protection. Does that apply to Australia as well? Are you concerned that our geographic location also doesn’t protect us and that we need to actually be more aware of this threat?

    Foreign Minister: Well, they’re your words, not mine. What I would say is the government is very clear about the importance of Australia having the strategic and military capability to enable both deterrence and assurance. And you’ve seen, whether it’s through AUKUS or the work that Minister Marles has done, the importance the Government places on making sure the Australian Defence Force is appropriately equipped to enable deterrence. And why do we want deterrence? Because that is central to stability. You need both deterrence and assurance to enable and promote stability and peace in the region.

    Karvelas: Minister, in terms of Airservices and their diversion of commercial planes, how long should we expect this will go on for? Is that something you will seek clarity for, from the Chinese?

    Foreign Minister: Well, I don’t have any advice about that, but that is ultimately a matter for Airservices to determine, the notice they need to give to vessels and aircraft.

    Karvelas: I want to change the topic if I can, Minister, to another foreign issue that has been of course, huge, and there is an anniversary coming up, which makes it very pivotal, I think. President Trump has referred to Zelenskyy as a dictator. Does that language alarm you?

    Foreign Minister: Well, I don’t believe he is. What I’ve said very clearly for many years now, is Russia is the aggressor here. Russia is engaged in an illegal and immoral war against Ukraine, contravened the UN Charter as a permanent member of the Security Council, used its veto to protect itself so it could continue to conduct this war. 

    We stand very firmly in solidarity with the people of Ukraine. I had the opportunity to briefly meet President Zelenskyy when I was in Poland recently, and I made very clear to him that we, the people of Australia, the country of Australia, continues to stand with him and the people of Ukraine in their struggle for their sovereignty. 

    Karvelas: Minister, are you concerned that the US is refusing to co-sponsor a draft UN resolution that demands Russia withdraw its troops?

    Foreign Minister: Well, the US can make its decisions, and it can articulate the reasons for it, what I will say to you is what our position is, and I’ve outlined it.

    Karvelas: Yesterday I spoke to former Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull, and he told me we can’t assume we can rely on America anymore, that this is quite a dramatic shift in geopolitical positioning. Is that right? We can’t rely on America anymore?

    Foreign Minister: America has been Australia’s principal strategic partner and strategic ally for many decades, and that alliance has stood the test of time, and it has stood the test of political change. It’s an alliance which has been, and a relationship, which has been fostered by and carried by administrations and governments of both political persuasions. 

    It is the case that President Trump is charting a very different course – and he said he would, and we should expect that – but we should also have some confidence in our capacity to navigate that. I was very pleased to and honoured to be the first Australian Foreign Minister to be invited to a presidential inauguration. I was very pleased to have the opportunity so early on in the Trump Administration to engage with my counterpart, Secretary Marco Rubio, and also National Security Advisor Waltz. Deputy Prime Minister Marles has also been and engaged with his counterpart. So, this is a very deep relationship. It’s a relationship where there is a lot of engagement, and it’s a relationship which is important to both countries. 

    Karvelas: I understand that the Russian Foreign Minister is also attending the meeting of Foreign Ministers, where you are. Have you spoken to him and raised the issue in relation to Oscar Jenkins?

    Foreign Minister: As you know, Patricia, we have discontinued engagement, or halted engagement with Russian officials at senior levels since the invasion of Ukraine. I did, however, make an exception for that yesterday, because I wanted to express very clearly to Mr Lavrov the importance of Oscar Jenkins’ condition. I expressed to him the importance we associate with Mr Jenkins being treated appropriately, and Russia complying with its international legal obligations. 

    Karvelas: And what response did you get? I mean, are you getting any opening in terms of what we might be able to do to get Oscar Jenkins back?

    Foreign Minister: Well, obviously I’m not going to disclose more than is in Mr Jenkins’ interest, but I can say to you very clearly that Mr Lavrov understood that our view was that Mr Jenkins needed to be treated appropriately and Russia needed to comply with its international legal obligations.

    Karvelas: Did you shirtfront him?

    Foreign Minister: Well, I think that’s a Tony Abbott term. I spoke to him, as you would expect, I would speak to him on such a matter.

    Karvelas: OK, you used the Penny Wong method, I understand. 

    Just finally, Minister, I understand, before I let you go, on Israel, are you concerned over the behaviour exhibited by Hamas, parading the bodies of these dead hostages, and are worried about one of the bodies was incorrectly returned – it is obviously incredibly, a very difficult time, especially the implications for the ceasefire?

    Foreign Minister: First, I condemn unequivocally the way in which Hamas dealt with this. It was a sickening and cruel way to deal with the return of these two young children, the bodies of two young children. So, I would just express my condolences and sympathy to the families. 

    In relation to the ceasefire, we obviously continue, as so many countries do around the world, to urge all parties to comply with the ceasefire, including the return of hostages.

    Karvelas: Foreign Minister, thank you so much for joining us.

    Foreign Minister: Good to speak with you, Patricia.

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI Economics: APAC motor insurance industry to surpass $301 billion by 2029, forecasts GlobalData

    Source: GlobalData

    APAC motor insurance industry to surpass $301 billion by 2029, forecasts GlobalData

    Posted in Insurance

    The motor insurance industry in the Asia-Pacific (APAC) region is projected to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 5.6% from an estimated $229.2 billion in 2024 to $301.7 billion in 2029, in terms of written premiums, according to GlobalData, a leading data and analytics company.

    GlobalData’s Global Motor Insurance Market report reveals that China, Japan, Australia, South Korea, and India are the key markets in the APAC motor insurance industry, collectively accounting for 92% of the industry’s written premiums in the region in 2024. The industry is expected to grow by 5.6% in 2025 driven by increased sales of motor vehicles including electric vehicles (EVs), government subsidies and carbon dioxide reduction policies, regulatory changes, increasing motor insurance tariffs, and technological advancements.

    Swarup Kumar Sahoo, Senior Insurance Analyst at GlobalData, comments: “The APAC motor insurance market is witnessing a transformation, driven by the rise of EVs and regulatory changes. The region’s economic growth and demographic shifts are also playing a crucial role in shaping the market dynamics. For instance, the surge in vehicle sales post-COVID-19 has increased motor policy sales. Additionally, the increasing adoption of AI and digitalization in the insurance industry is enhancing service quality and operational efficiency, paving the way for future growth.”

    Insurers are developing new policies to cover EVs, which come with a new set of risks, as EV sales increased significantly in 2023-24 and further growth is anticipated in 2025 and beyond. Regulatory bodies in Taiwan, Singapore, and China are formulating specific insurance regulations for EV-related products, ensuring that the market adapts to the evolving landscape. This trend is expected to continue, with government subsidies and carbon reduction policies further boosting EV sales and, consequently, motor insurance demand.

    The strategic move by vehicle manufacturers to acquire insurance companies will also contribute to the growth. In May 2024, BYD, an electric carmaker, received regulatory approval for its new motor liability insurance offering after acquiring an insurance company in China. This trend highlights the increasing integration of vehicle manufacturers and insurance providers to offer enhanced experience for consumers and expand the market’s reach. The rise in new energy vehicles (NEVs) in China, accounting for a third of sales in 2023, underscores the potential for further growth in the motor insurance sector.

    Sahoo adds: “The adoption of AI and digitalization is also reshaping the motor insurance landscape in APAC. Insurers are leveraging vast amounts of data to develop risk curves and pricing models for NEVs, enhancing their ability to offer competitive and tailored products. However, the market remains tightly regulated, with constraints on premium increases posing challenges for insurers. Despite these hurdles, the focus on underwriting rigor and moderate rate increases is expected to sustain profitability and drive growth in the coming years.”

    Pay As You Drive (PAYD) motor policies are becoming increasingly popular in the APAC markets such as South Korea, Singapore, Malaysia, and India. As the major benefit of such policies is lower premium rates based on good driving behavior, distance traveled, and driving patterns, its wider adoption and popularity will offset premium hikes in the short term, impacting the industry’s performance.

    Sahoo concludes: “The increasing adoption of EVs, pay-as-you-go policies, regulatory advancements, and technological innovations are set to redefine the market landscape. As countries like Indonesia plan to mandate motor third-party liability insurance and Malaysia aims for a significant EV market share by 2030, the motor insurance market in APAC is poised for substantial growth. Insurers must continue to adapt to these changes, leveraging technology and strategic partnerships to capitalize on emerging opportunities and ensure sustained success.”

    MIL OSI Economics

  • MIL-OSI Australia: MEDIA RELEASE: ‘Definite decision’ trigger a win for common sense – AREEA

    Source: Australian Mines and Metals Association – AMMA

    Statement by AREEA Chief Executive Officer Steve Knott AM

    The Fair Work Commission has taken a common sense approach by retaining the definite decision trigger in the new model consultation term for enterprise agreements.

    Today, a FWC Full Bench published its final decision on enterprise agreement model terms for consultation, flexibility and dispute resolution in workplaces.

    While employers and employees can negotiate their own terms provided they meet legal requirements, the new model terms will serve as the default in various circumstances.

    Union calls to lower the threshold for employer consultation with employees from a “definite decision” on a major workplace change to merely proposing to introduce such were shrill and ill-advised.

    As AREEA underscored in its submissions to the Full Bench, caving in to union demands on the definite decision trigger would have abandoned decades of precedent and best practice.

    Consultation is properly and only about the consequential decisions for employment that arise from a substantive business decision.

    It would be absurd to require a board of directors to consult employees on issues such as company mergers, acquisitions or business closures prior to discharging their duties to make such decisions in the best interests of the company and its shareholders.

    The 40-year-old precedent behind the definite decision trigger – based upon the landmark 1984 Termination, Change and Redundancy case – has stood the test of time as it makes sense for commercial decision-making and with respect to directors’ legal obligations.

    Employers also welcome the new consultation term preserving criteria as to what constitutes major workplace change, namely major change to production, program, organisation, structure or technology.

    The removal of these clear parameters, as advocated by the ACTU, would have greatly increased the risk of disputes between unions and employers over what is considered major change.

    With employers already hit hard by the Albanese Government’s IR agenda, including new union workplace powers, such uncertainty would have only added to the red tape dragging down the productivity of Australian workplaces.

     

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI Australia: 47-2025: Services Restored: Friday 21 February 2025 – DAFF messaging, COLS

    Source: Australia Government Statements – Agriculture

    21 February 2025

    Who does this notice affect?

    All clients submitting the below declarations:

    • Full Import Declaration (FID)
    • Long Form Self Assessed Clearance (LFSAC)
    • Short Form Self Assessed Clearance (SFSAC)
    • Cargo Report Self Assessed Clearance (CRSAC)
    • Cargo Report Personal Effects (PE)

    All importers and customs brokers who will be required to lodge imported cargo documentation to the department for biosecurity assessment…

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Australian Education Union annual conference

    Source: Australian Ministers for Education

    Let me begin by acknowledging the Traditional Owners of the land on which we are meeting and pay my respects to elders past, present and emerging.

    There is really only one job in politics I have ever wanted. And this is it. 

    There is one reason more than anything else I wanted to do it. 

    To do what we are doing right now.

    Fixing the funding of our public schools and what it will do.

    I don’t think there’s anything more important than what we do in education. 

    It doesn’t just change lives. 

    Its impact ricochets through generations. If you finish school, your kids are more likely to finish school.

    It changes communities too and it changes countries. It’s changed ours. 

    And public education does most of that heavy lifting. 

    It’s where you’ll find the most disadvantaged children in this country. The children who need our help the most. 

    And these are the schools that are most underfunded. 

    Where the challenges are the greatest. Where the need is the greatest. 

    This is what we’ve got to fix. We have got a long way to go, but a lot has happened in the last 12 months.  

    This time last year I talked about the agreement I had just signed with Western Australia. 

    That extra funding is now in WA schools. 

    Last year I also reached agreements Tasmania, the ACT and the Northern Territory. 

    And that funding is also now rolling out. 

    There’s no public school in the country, apart from the ACT, where funding is at the Gonski level yet.

    And there’s no public school in the country where the disadvantage is as bad or the funding is as low as the Northern Territory. 

    Until this agreement. 

    It was sitting at less than 80 per cent of the SRS. 

    In other words, one in five children in the Northern Territory were effectively not being funded at all. 

    This agreement fixes that. 

    It doubles the amount of money that the Australian Government puts into public schools in the Northern Territory.

    It means instead of reaching full funding in the second half of this century. 

    They will reach it in the next few years.   

    It means that some of the most disadvantaged public schools in this country will now be some of the best funded.

    That’s the sort of thing that will change lives. 

    It is the sort of thing that only Labor Governments do.

    And since I last spoke at this conference, something else just as important has happened. 

    We’ve doubled what we’re offering the states. 

    We will fund the full 5 per cent. What you’ve always asked for. 

    In return, we want the states to get rid of the 4 per cent that is spent on things like capital depreciation – what you have also been calling for. 

    That’s a big shift. 

    And South Australia has signed up to that, Victoria has signed up to that too and so has Western Australia. 

    And I want to do the same across the country. 

    This is a big change, that you have made happen. 

    It still involves the Australian Government and state governments both chipping in. 

    And it still means tying that funding to the sort of things that we know will help children who need extra help and support.

    The sort of things that you’ve been calling for and asking for. 

    Things like extra funding for catch-up tutoring and mental health support.

    And it means being able to see where that money is going. Making sure it goes where it’s needed. The sort of transparency that you’ve been asking for. 

    That’s where we stand today. 

    I can promise you as long as I am in this job, I will not stop fighting for this.

    What I can’t promise you is that this will survive if Peter Dutton becomes Prime Minister. 

    That’s not a threat, it’s just the truth. 

    You just have to look at what they did last time.

    They ripped the guts out of funding for public schools.

    The legislation we have put in place last year will make it hard for him, but not impossible.

    The fact is if he wins he could still reverse that and rip this funding out.

    That’s the truth. 

    There is a lot more to do, I know that, but there is also a lot to fight to keep. 

    I don’t think it is over the top to say that the future of public education is at stake. 

    If this funding gets ripped out again, inevitably it means more kids will leave the public education system. More teachers will leave too, and more kids won’t finish high school. 

    Our schools will become even more segregated than they are today. 

    I know you know this, that’s why you’ve been fighting for this when others haven’t. 

    Fighting for this for more than a decade. Keeping the cause alive. 

    This wouldn’t be happening without you, that’s the truth. But the fight isn’t over yet. 

    Something else I want to talk about today. Something worth celebrating. 

    That’s the pay rises in the last 12 months in NSW, South Australia, Western Australia and the NT and the impact they are having. 

    And the agreements you’ve struck that make a dent in things like workload. Things like more school development days, extra admin support and things like the right to disconnect.

    I remember a primary school teacher telling me once that he carried 30 parents around in his pocket.  

    And that high school teachers carry more than 100. 

    They send him messages often late at night. Not thinking they are bothering him, but that’s just when they’ve got a spare minute when the kids are asleep, but still his phone would ping. 

    That’s what the right to disconnect is all about. That’s why the agreements like the one struck in NSW are so important. 

    There was some good news on Monday that shows the number of teachers last year jumped by about 8,000. That’s good. 

    It doesn’t mean we don’t still have serious teacher shortages, of course we do, but what it shows, I think, is if you pay people more and respect the work they do, more people want to do the job and more people are likely to stay. 

    You can also see the signs of this in the number of people enrolling in teaching courses this year – up 14 per cent. 

    I’ve got to think that’s helped by pay increases, the agreements, but also things like the new Commonwealth Teaching Scholarships – worth about 40 grand or twice the cost of a teaching degree.

    It’s an old school idea that we’ve brought back – we help you cut the costs while you are at uni and you pay it back by working in the public school system when you graduate. 

    And from 1 July this year, for the first time ever, we’ll start providing financial support for teaching students while they do their prac.

    It all helps. It’s all important. 

    I’m not saying all the problems, all the challenges, all the shortages are fixed – they’re not, of course they’re not, but finally, for the first time in a long time things are starting to head in the right direction. 

    Something else I want to mention today and that’s what we are doing before kids ever start kindy or prep, before they step into your classrooms. 

    I think you know what I am about to say, education doesn’t start at 5 and what we do here, in those first five years, has a big impact on the sort of challenges school teachers face. 

    And just like there’s a shortage of teachers in our schools, there’s a real shortage of early educators. 

    A big part of that is just people leaving. 

    When we won the election two and half years ago, they were leaving in droves.

    Many just because they couldn’t afford to keep doing it. They could earn more at Coles or Woolies or Bunnings. 

    That’s now changing. 

    And that’s because of the 15 per cent pay rise that we’re now rolling out. 

    The best example of that is what’s happening at Goodstart, the biggest childcare operator in the country.

    At their centres job applications have now jumped by 35 per cent in the last few months. 

    Expressions of interest have jumped by 50 per cent, and vacancy rates are down by a massive 28 per cent. 

    We’re seeing that sort of thing right across the country.

    Again, it turns out that, if you pay people more, more want to do the job.

    And last week we did something else. We passed laws that will change the lives of some of the most disadvantaged children in Australia. 

    You know these kids. The first time they step into a classroom environment is when they get to school. 

    They never experience early education or don’t get enough of it. 

    One of the reasons for that is a thing called the Activity Test. Something put in place by the Liberal Party that meant parents couldn’t get the Child Care Subsidy. 

    And it meant that their kids start school behind. 

    The legislation we passed through Parliament last week gets rid of that test and replaces it with a three day guarantee. 

    A guarantee of three days a week of government supported early education and care for every child who needs it. 

    No one blinks when you say every child has a right to go to school and government has a responsibility to help fund it. 

    The same has got to be true for early education. That doesn’t mean it should be compulsory. But it should be there for every parent who wants it and every child who needs it. 

    To help make sure they start school ready to go. 

    And that’s what happened last week.

    Again, that’s the sort of reform that only Labor Governments do. And that our country needs. 

    I know there is more to do. 

    I don’t have to convince you of that. 

    And I don’t expect you to stop fighting for it. 

    I hope you don’t.  I know you won’t. 

    So let me end by just saying thank you. 

    Thank you for everything you do. 

    Thank you for working with me over the last two and half years. 

    And thank you for what you are about to do. 

    To help make sure that Peter Dutton doesn’t get the chance to do a Tony Abbott 2.0 and rip everything we have done away.

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Charges – Drive motor vehicle without consent – Woodroffe

    Source: Northern Territory Police and Fire Services

    The Northern Territory Police Force has charged a female youth for theft and driving offences this morning. 

    About 5am, Strike Force Trident members attempted a traffic apprehension on a stolen motor vehicle on Temple Terrace in Woodroffe, before a pursuit commenced after the vehicle failed to stop.

    A short time later the stolen vehicle clipped a tree on the side of the road, causing the driver to lose control and make impact with a pole at low speed.

    The 15-year-old female driver was arrested and conveyed to Palmerston Regional Hospital for a medical assessment, before being taken to Palmerston Watch House.

    She was later charged with, theft, driving a motor vehicle without consent, drive manner dangerous in a pursuit, drive unlicenced and breach bail and will appear in the court later today.

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-Evening Report: The promise of green iron, steel and ammonia is keeping the green hydrogen dream alive

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Changlong Wang, Research fellow in Civil and Environmental Engineering, Monash University

    D.Alimkin, Shutterstock

    Hydrogen was once sold as a universal climate fix — a clean, green wonder fuel for cars, homes, power grids and even global export. But reality has cooled that buzz.

    This week, the South Australian government shelved plans for a A$593 million hydrogen power plant, in favour of injecting that money into the $2.4 billion Whyalla steelworks rescue package. Premier Peter Malinauskas said there was “no point in producing hydrogen” without a customer: the steelworks.

    It’s the latest in a series of setbacks for hydrogen. Last year, Australian mining and energy giant Fortescue pared back its green hydrogen projects as a result of increasing costs and changing financial circumstances in the United States.

    Then, gas and oil heavyweight Woodside withdrew plans for two large-scale green hydrogen projects and Origin Energy dropped out of the Hunter Valley Hydrogen Hub.

    Meanwhile, the Hydrogen Energy Supply Chain project in Victoria, meant to ship hydrogen to Japan, has met with delays and overruns. Earlier this month, the new Queensland government chose to halt further investment in the Central Queensland Hydrogen Project, putting plans to export hydrogen in doubt.

    These setbacks show hydrogen isn’t the ultimate solution to all our energy needs, especially if we want to export it. But they don’t spell doom. Instead, they nudge us toward where hydrogen really shines: in heavy industry, right where it’s made.

    Heavy industry: where hydrogen makes sense

    Heavy industries such as steel manufacturing and ammonia production are where hydrogen proves its worth. These sectors are significant contributors to climate change — steel accounts for about 8% of global greenhouse gas emissions, ammonia a further 2%.

    Most emissions from steelmaking come from burning coal in blast furnaces to convert ore into iron and carbon dioxide.

    In a cleaner alternative, hydrogen (when produced using renewable energy) can be used to strip oxygen from the ore and make iron, with water as a byproduct. The result is green iron, ready to be turned into steel in an electric arc furnace – with a fraction of the emissions.

    Ammonia is used to make fertiliser and industrial chemicals, and hydrogen is one of the main ingredients in its production. Hydrogen bonds with nitrogen from the air to form ammonia. No hydrogen, no ammonia — it’s that simple. Conventional ammonia plants get hydrogen from methane, producing CO₂ in the process. Green ammonia uses renewable energy to produce hydrogen by splitting water via electrolysis.

    Our recent research crunched the numbers on producing these new green commodities. We found making green iron in Australia with hydrogen and shipping it to Europe for steel production could be 21% cheaper than exporting raw iron ore and hydrogen separately. Plus, it could cut emissions by up to 95% compared to traditional methods.

    There are huge economic opportunities for Australia too. Instead of shipping low-value raw materials, Australia could export ready-to-use green iron or green steel, reshaping global supply chains while cutting costs and carbon. That’s the kind of rethink hydrogen enables.

    Industry hubs: a practical fix

    Transporting hydrogen long distances is costly and inefficient. The fix? Industry hubs that produce hydrogen right where it’s needed — next to steel mills, ammonia plants, desalination plants, water treatment plants or even aluminium smelters. Putting producers and consumers together slashes transport costs and unlocks efficiencies.

    We’ve built tools to pinpoint places with the greatest potential to produce these new green commodities.

    The Hydrogen Economic Fairways Tool maps where renewable energy, infrastructure and industrial sites align for cost-effective hydrogen production.

    The Green Steel Economic Fairways Mapper zooms in on prime locations for green steel, spotlighting places such as Eyre Peninsula in SA and the Pilbara in Western Australia, among others (see below). These locations have abundant wind and solar resources alongside an existing industrial base.

    The Green Steel Economic Fairways Mapper compares the levelised cost of steel, including production and transport to the port. a) Regional changes across Australia b) Example of how to optimise the system to minimise the levelised cost of producing 1 million tonnes per annum c) Breakdown of costs d) Hourly system performance, in terms of energy flows.
    Green Steel Economic Fairways Mapper, Geoscience Australia

    Challenges remain

    Green hydrogen promises to revolutionise heavy industries, but significant hurdles stand in the way of widespread domestic adoption. The biggest challenge comes from the unpredictable nature of renewable energy, which makes it hard to maintain the steady hydrogen supply industries need.

    The costs remain steep, too. Splitting water into hydrogen using renewable electricity isn’t cheap, particularly when you need backup storage systems to keep production going during cloudy or windless periods.

    Getting hydrogen where it needs to go poses another major challenge. As hydrogen is both bulky to transport and highly flammable, it requires special handling and infrastructure, driving up costs, especially for facilities far from production sites.

    Many companies also hesitate to invest in hydrogen-compatible equipment, as retrofitting existing plants or building new ones requires substantial upfront costs without guaranteed returns.

    The $2.4 billion rescue package for the Whyalla Steelworks (ABC News)

    Government backing: a push in the right direction

    Thursday’s announcement of A$2.4 billion investment in the Whyalla steelworks along with plans for a $1 billion green iron investment fund are a bold bet on green steel. Furthermore, the landmark Future Made in Australia legislation introduces a $6.7 billion Hydrogen Production Tax Incentive, offering $2 per kilogram of renewable hydrogen produced between 2027–28 and 2039–40, alongside a 10% tax credit for critical minerals processing.

    Meanwhile tax credits for green aluminium and alumina should help another heavy industry to navigate the energy transition using clean hydrogen.

    These measures aim to unlock tens of billions in private investment, boost regional economies, and position Australia as a leader in clean energy manufacturing. This isn’t just about one-off projects. It’s laying the groundwork for hubs that link renewable energy and hydrogen production to industrial demand.

    There’s more in the pipeline. The Hydrogen Headstart program pumps funds into hydrogen innovation, and the Future Made in Australia initiative backs clean industry with billions more. Add in policies like carbon pricing or low-interest loans, and the economics tilt even further toward green steel and ammonia. Government buying power — in the form of procurement targets for low-carbon materials — could seal the deal by guaranteeing demand.

    These policies aren’t just wishful thinking — they’re practical steps that are already working elsewhere. Sweden’s HYBRIT project, which paired green steel with government-backed demand, has already led to construction starting on new industrial-scale green steel facilities. At the same time, the European Union’s hydrogen strategy leans on carbon pricing and subsidies to guide industries and suppliers through the energy transition, while Japan offers incentives for the use of green steel in their automotive industry.

    Australia has the renewable energy and the industrial base to take advantage of these opportunities. With the right leadership, we can turn hydrogen’s stumbles into a global triumph for heavy industry.

    Changlong receives funding from the South Australian Department for Energy and Mining to conduct the SA Green Iron Study, and from Geoscience Australia under the Exploring for the Future program to develop the Hydrogen and Green Steel Economic Fairways tool. Changlong is affiliated with Melbourne Climate Futures, University of Melbourne, and is a visiting fellow at Engineering Science, Oxford University, UK.

    Stuart Walsh receives funding from Geoscience Australia supporting the development of the Bluecap software suite, which highlights opportunities for new renewable energy and critical mineral projects in Australia. Stuart received funding from the South Australian Department for Energy and Mining to conduct the SA Green Iron Study and from Geoscience Australia under the Exploring for the Future program to develop the Hydrogen and Green Steel Economic Fairways tool.

    ref. The promise of green iron, steel and ammonia is keeping the green hydrogen dream alive – https://theconversation.com/the-promise-of-green-iron-steel-and-ammonia-is-keeping-the-green-hydrogen-dream-alive-250410

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-Evening Report: ‘Active recovery’ after exercise is supposed to improve performance – but does it really work?

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Hunter Bennett, Lecturer in Exercise Science, University of South Australia

    gpointstudio/Shutterstock

    Imagine you have just finished a workout. Your legs are like jelly, your lungs are burning and you just want to collapse on the couch.

    But instead, you pick yourself up and go for a brisk walk.

    While this might seem counterintuitive, doing some light activity after an intense workout – known as “active recovery” – has been suggested to reduce soreness and speed up recovery after exercise.

    But does it work or is it just another fitness myth?

    What is active recovery?

    Active recovery simply describes doing some low-intensity physical activity after a strenuous bout of exercise.

    This is commonly achieved through low-intensity cardio, such as walking or cycling, but can also consist of low-intensity stretching, or even bodyweight exercises such as squats and lunges.

    The key thing is making sure the intensity is light or moderate, without moving into the “vigorous” range.

    As a general rule, if you can maintain a conversation while you’re exercising, you are working at a light-to-moderate intensity.

    Some people consider doing an easy training session on their “rest days” as a form of active recovery. However, this has not really been researched. So we will be focusing on the more traditional form of active recovery in this article, where it is performed straight after exercise.

    What does active recovery do?

    Active recovery helps speed up the removal of waste products, such as lactate and hydrogen, after exercise. These waste products are moved from the muscles into the blood, before being broken down and used for energy, or simply excreted.

    This is thought to be one of the ways it promotes recovery.

    In some instances active recovery has been shown to reduce muscle soreness in the days following exercise. This may lead to a faster return to peak performance in some physical capabilities such as jump height.

    Active recovery can involve stretching.
    fatir29/Shutterstock

    But, active recovery does not appear to reduce post-exercise inflammation. While this may sound like a bad thing, it’s not.

    Post-exercise inflammation can promote increases in strength and fitness after exercise. And so when it’s reduced (say, by using ice baths after exercise) this can lead to smaller training improvements than would be seen otherwise.

    This means active recovery can be used regularly after exercise without the risk of affecting the benefits of the main exercise session.

    There’s evidence to the contrary too

    Not all research on active recovery is positive.

    Several studies indicate it’s no better than simply lying on the couch when it comes to reducing muscle soreness and improving performance after exercise.

    In fact, there’s more research suggesting active recovery doesn’t have an effect than research showing it does have an effect.

    While there could be several reasons for this, two stand out.

    First, the way in which active recovery is applied in the research varies as lot. It’s likely there is a sweet spot in terms of how long active recovery should last to maximise its benefits (more on this later).

    Second, it’s likely the benefits of active recovery are trivial to small. As such, they won’t always be considered “significant” in the scientific literature, despite offering potentially meaningful benefits at an individual level. In sport science, studies often have small sample sizes, which can make it hard to see small effects.

    But there doesn’t seem to be any research suggesting active recovery is less effective than doing nothing, so at worst it certainly won’t cause any harm.

    When is active recovery useful?

    Active recovery appears useful if you need to perform multiple bouts of exercise within a short time frame. For example, if you were in a tournament and had 10–20 minutes between games, then a quick active recovery would be better than doing nothing.

    Active recovery might also be a useful strategy if you have to perform exercise again within 24 hours after intense activity.

    For example, if you are someone who plays sport and you need to play games on back-to-back days, doing some low-intensity active recovery after each game might help reduce soreness and improve performance on subsequent days.

    Similarly, if you are training for an event like a marathon and you have a training session the day after a particularly long or intense run, then active recovery might get you better prepared for your next training session.

    Conversely, if you have just completed a low-to-moderate intensity bout of exercise, it’s unlikely active recovery will offer the same benefits. And if you will get more than 24 hours of rest between exercise sessions, active recovery is unlikely to do much because this will probably be long enough for your body to recover naturally anyway.

    Active recovery may be useful for people with back-to-back sporting commitments.
    Monkey Business Images/Shutterstock

    How to get the most out of active recovery

    The good news is you don’t have to do a lot of active recovery to see a benefit.

    A systematic review looking at the effectiveness of active recovery across 26 studies found 6–10 minutes of exercise was the sweet spot when it came to enhancing recovery.

    Interestingly, the intensity of exercise didn’t seem to matter. If it was within this time frame, it had a positive effect.

    So it makes sense to make your active recovery easy (because why would you make it hard if you don’t have to?) by keeping it in the light-to-moderate intensity range.

    However, don’t expect active recovery to be a complete game changer. The research would suggest the benefits are likely to be small at best.

    The authors do not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and have disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. ‘Active recovery’ after exercise is supposed to improve performance – but does it really work? – https://theconversation.com/active-recovery-after-exercise-is-supposed-to-improve-performance-but-does-it-really-work-250068

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-OSI Global: ‘Active recovery’ after exercise is supposed to improve performance – but does it really work?

    Source: The Conversation – Global Perspectives – By Hunter Bennett, Lecturer in Exercise Science, University of South Australia

    gpointstudio/Shutterstock

    Imagine you have just finished a workout. Your legs are like jelly, your lungs are burning and you just want to collapse on the couch.

    But instead, you pick yourself up and go for a brisk walk.

    While this might seem counterintuitive, doing some light activity after an intense workout – known as “active recovery” – has been suggested to reduce soreness and speed up recovery after exercise.

    But does it work or is it just another fitness myth?

    What is active recovery?

    Active recovery simply describes doing some low-intensity physical activity after a strenuous bout of exercise.

    This is commonly achieved through low-intensity cardio, such as walking or cycling, but can also consist of low-intensity stretching, or even bodyweight exercises such as squats and lunges.

    The key thing is making sure the intensity is light or moderate, without moving into the “vigorous” range.

    As a general rule, if you can maintain a conversation while you’re exercising, you are working at a light-to-moderate intensity.

    Some people consider doing an easy training session on their “rest days” as a form of active recovery. However, this has not really been researched. So we will be focusing on the more traditional form of active recovery in this article, where it is performed straight after exercise.

    What does active recovery do?

    Active recovery helps speed up the removal of waste products, such as lactate and hydrogen, after exercise. These waste products are moved from the muscles into the blood, before being broken down and used for energy, or simply excreted.

    This is thought to be one of the ways it promotes recovery.

    In some instances active recovery has been shown to reduce muscle soreness in the days following exercise. This may lead to a faster return to peak performance in some physical capabilities such as jump height.

    Active recovery can involve stretching.
    fatir29/Shutterstock

    But, active recovery does not appear to reduce post-exercise inflammation. While this may sound like a bad thing, it’s not.

    Post-exercise inflammation can promote increases in strength and fitness after exercise. And so when it’s reduced (say, by using ice baths after exercise) this can lead to smaller training improvements than would be seen otherwise.

    This means active recovery can be used regularly after exercise without the risk of affecting the benefits of the main exercise session.

    There’s evidence to the contrary too

    Not all research on active recovery is positive.

    Several studies indicate it’s no better than simply lying on the couch when it comes to reducing muscle soreness and improving performance after exercise.

    In fact, there’s more research suggesting active recovery doesn’t have an effect than research showing it does have an effect.

    While there could be several reasons for this, two stand out.

    First, the way in which active recovery is applied in the research varies as lot. It’s likely there is a sweet spot in terms of how long active recovery should last to maximise its benefits (more on this later).

    Second, it’s likely the benefits of active recovery are trivial to small. As such, they won’t always be considered “significant” in the scientific literature, despite offering potentially meaningful benefits at an individual level. In sport science, studies often have small sample sizes, which can make it hard to see small effects.

    But there doesn’t seem to be any research suggesting active recovery is less effective than doing nothing, so at worst it certainly won’t cause any harm.

    When is active recovery useful?

    Active recovery appears useful if you need to perform multiple bouts of exercise within a short time frame. For example, if you were in a tournament and had 10–20 minutes between games, then a quick active recovery would be better than doing nothing.

    Active recovery might also be a useful strategy if you have to perform exercise again within 24 hours after intense activity.

    For example, if you are someone who plays sport and you need to play games on back-to-back days, doing some low-intensity active recovery after each game might help reduce soreness and improve performance on subsequent days.

    Similarly, if you are training for an event like a marathon and you have a training session the day after a particularly long or intense run, then active recovery might get you better prepared for your next training session.

    Conversely, if you have just completed a low-to-moderate intensity bout of exercise, it’s unlikely active recovery will offer the same benefits. And if you will get more than 24 hours of rest between exercise sessions, active recovery is unlikely to do much because this will probably be long enough for your body to recover naturally anyway.

    Active recovery may be useful for people with back-to-back sporting commitments.
    Monkey Business Images/Shutterstock

    How to get the most out of active recovery

    The good news is you don’t have to do a lot of active recovery to see a benefit.

    A systematic review looking at the effectiveness of active recovery across 26 studies found 6–10 minutes of exercise was the sweet spot when it came to enhancing recovery.

    Interestingly, the intensity of exercise didn’t seem to matter. If it was within this time frame, it had a positive effect.

    So it makes sense to make your active recovery easy (because why would you make it hard if you don’t have to?) by keeping it in the light-to-moderate intensity range.

    However, don’t expect active recovery to be a complete game changer. The research would suggest the benefits are likely to be small at best.

    The authors do not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and have disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. ‘Active recovery’ after exercise is supposed to improve performance – but does it really work? – https://theconversation.com/active-recovery-after-exercise-is-supposed-to-improve-performance-but-does-it-really-work-250068

    MIL OSI – Global Reports

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Total Fire Ban for Mallee, Wimmera, North Central, South West and Central regions

    Source: Victoria Country Fire Authority

    A Total Fire Ban (TFB) has been declared for the Mallee, Wimmera, North Central, South West and Central regions tomorrow, Saturday 22 February 2025.

    Tomorrow’s hot, dry and windy conditions will drive elevated fire danger across the state for the majority of the day and overnight, with temperatures reaching low 40s in the northwest and mid 30s elsewhere.

    The damaging northerly winds will reach an average of 30km/hr in the west and central parts, with gusts of up to 100km/hr.

    A westerly south westerly wind change is expected to enter the far west unusually late around 5pm, before stalling overnight and pushing through Melbourne late Sunday morning.

    A Total Fire Ban means no fire can be lit in the open air or allowed to remain alight from 12.01am to 11.59pm on the day of the Total Fire Ban. 

    CFA Chief Officer Jason Heffernan said the TFB has been declared due to the expected forecast that could present challenging fire behaviour over the next two days.

    “Tomorrow’s conditions in several parts of the state will make it difficult for firefighters to supress a fire should one start,” Jason said.

    “We are also seeing the potential for dry thunderstorms in the northwest later in the day that could result in dry lightning strikes hitting the ground and ultimately causing new ignitions and concerns for firefighters.

    “We’re asking people to follow the strict conditions associated with the TFB declaration, stay well informed with warnings through the VicEmergency app and understand how the increased fire risk will impact you, ensuring your fire plan covers all possible contingencies.”

    Victorians can find out if it is a Total Fire Ban on the CFA website www.cfa.vic.gov.au, where it is usually published by 5pm the day before a Total Fire Ban.

    For more information on what you can and can’t do visit the Can I or Can’t I page on the CFA website. Victorians should also make sure they have access to more than one source of information.

    They include:

    • ABC local radio, commercial and designated radio stations of Sky News
    • The VicEmergency App
    • The VicEmergency website www.emergency.vic.gov.au
    • The VicEmergency Hotline on 1800 226 226
    • CFA or VicEmergency Twitter or Facebook
    Submitted by CFA media

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Charges – Aggravated burglary – Jingili

    Source: Northern Territory Police and Fire Services

    The Northern Territory Police Force has charged two male youths in relation to an aggravated robbery in Jingili yesterday.

    About 3pm, a resident allegedly observed three youths in his yard and was threatened by one of them with an edged weapon. A short time later, the youths fled the scene, after stealing items from the residence.

    Strike Force Trident investigated the incident and identified two of the youth offenders being a 14-year-old and 15-year-old, and later that same day, arrested both youths in Millner.

    Both the 14-year-old and 15-year-old were charged with aggravated burglary, aggravated robbery, theft and breach of bail, and will appear in court today.

    Strike Force Trident are continuing investigations into the identity of the third youth.

    Police urge anyone with information to contact police on 131 444 and quote job number NTP2500018708. In an emergency dial 000.

    Anonymous reports can be made through Crime Stoppers on 1800 333 000 or through https://crimestoppersnt.com.au/

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI Russia: Silver medals of the NSU aerobics team

    Translartion. Region: Russians Fedetion –

    Source: Novosibirsk State University – Novosibirsk State University –

    The Novosibirsk Region Cup in sports aerobics was held at the NSTU Sports Palace, in which NSU athletes showed excellent results.

    In January 2025, the rules for holding competitions in this sport changed, and teams had to quickly rework their compositions, adapting to the new requirements. Despite this, our students became silver medalists in all group nominations – in dance gymnastics, gymnastics platform and Group-5.

    The following players played for the NSU team:

    Vladislava Bulavina, Victoria Detusheva, Olga Shishkina and Valeria Shatskova (GI)

    Lada Avdonina, Anna Nikulina and Maria Yukhnina (FIT)

    Victoria Babakova and Arina Gulenko (FEN)

    Ulyana Gruzdeva (IFP)

    Sofia Balya (EF)

    Anastasia Iskova (FF)

    Nadezhda Semina (MMF)

    Olga Terina (FEN) and Polina Maryasova (IFP) fulfilled the standard of candidate for master of sports.

    We congratulate the girls and their coach Anna Timofeeva on their successful performance and wish them success in all upcoming competitions.

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI Global: It’s the biggest Egyptian tomb discovery in a century. Who was Thutmose II?

    Source: The Conversation – Global Perspectives – By Anna M. Kotarba-Morley, Senior Lecturer in Museum and Curatorial Studies / Research Fellow, University of Adelaide

    Wikimedia/The Conversation

    Archaeologists in Egypt have made an exciting discovery: the tomb of Pharaoh Thutmose II, a ruler who has long been overshadowed by his famous wife and half-sister, Queen Hatshepsut.

    The remarkable find is located in the Western Valley (a burial ground for queens rather than kings), near the complex of Deir el-Bahari, which houses the funerary temple of Hatshepsut. Both of us worked together as archaeologists at this spectacular site some 15 years ago.

    Thutmose II’s tomb has been labelled the first, and biggest, discovery of a royal tomb since Tutankhamun’s tomb was found just over 100 years ago.

    Despite being totally empty, it’s a crucial element in further understanding a transformative period in ancient Egyptian history.

    Hatshepsut’s forgotten brother and husband

    Thutmose II (also called Akheperenre) reigned in the first half of the 15th century BCE. This made him the fourth ruler of the 18th Egyptian Dynasty, which marked the beginning of the New Kingdom period.

    Thutmose II likely ruled for a little over ten years, although some scholars believe his reign may have lasted only three years.

    He was the son of a great pharaoh Thutmose I and his lesser wife, Mutnofret. He married his half-sister Queen Hatshepsut according to the royal custom, to solidify the rule and bloodline. Together they had a daughter named Nefrure.

    Thutmose II’s mummy was discovered in 1881 but his original tomb was unknown until now.
    Wikimedia

    Upon his death, his wife Hatshepsut became the sixth pharaoh of the 18th Dynasty – and arguably one of the most famous and successful female rulers of all time.

    Military activities

    As the successor of Thutmose I, Thutmose II continued his father’s military policy in the southern regions of Egypt.

    According to preserved inscriptions, he ordered the brutal suppression of a rebellion against Egyptian rule in the land of Kush (in present-day north Sudan). As a result, a significant number of prisoners were brought to Egypt – possibly as part of a campaign.

    But Thutmose II’s military campaigns were minor in comparison to the grand conquests of his predecessors and successors. Most historians believe he was a weak ruler and that Hatshepsut had a major role in governing the country, even long before his death. However, others contest this.

    Thutmose II’s short reign left modest traces of building activity in Karnak, one of the largest religious centres in ancient Egypt, located in present-day Luxor.

    The structure, of which only fragments survive, features a unique decoration depicting Thutmose II, Hatshepsut as his royal wife before she became a ruler, and their daughter Nefrure. The origins of the monument are uncertain. It’s possible Thutmose II started it and Hatshepsut finished it.

    The monument was reconstructed by French researchers and can now be admired at the Open Air Museum in Karnak.

    Karnak is one of the most important religious centres in Ancient Egypt.
    Katarzyna Kapiec

    Other monuments of Thutmose II were found in the southern regions of Egypt, such as in Elephantine, in the city of Aswan, and in northern Sudan (likely connected to his military campaigns).

    The condemnation of Hatshepsut’s memory

    Interestingly, the name of Thutmose II became strongly associated with many of Hatshepsut’s constructions due to the actions of Thutmose III.

    Regarded as one of the greatest warriors, military commanders and military strategists of all time, Thutmose III was the nephew and stepson of Hatshepsut, and co-ruled with her as a regent.

    At the end of Thutmose III’s reign, some 20 years after Hatshepsut’s death, he carried out a large-scale campaign to remove or alter Hatshepsut’s names and images. Scholars call this “damnatio memoriae”, or condemnation of the memory.

    An example of Hatshepsut’s ‘damnatio memoriae’ at Deir el-Bahari. Hatshepsut’s cartouches (left) were defaced, while Thutmose III’s (right) remained untouched.
    Wikimedia

    This was likely due to concerns about securing the throne for his successor, Amenhotep II, by linking him to his male ancestors.

    In many cases, Hatshepsut’s name was replaced with that of Thutmose II, making him the principal celebrant in temples built by Hatshepsut, such as in Deir el-Bahari.

    View at the temple of Hatshepsut at Deir el-Bahari at the dawn.
    Katarzyna Kapiec

    What does Thutmose II’s empty tomb tell us?

    The newly discovered tomb reveals fresh details about the status of Thutmose II and his role in the sociopolitical structure of 15th century BCE Egypt – a period of territorial expansion, wealth and political intrigue. It also sheds light on the perception of his rule at the time.

    Thutmose II has been painted as an ineffectual ruler. And the latest findings don’t contradict this.

    Unlike his father Thutmose I, who expanded Egypt’s reign through military strength, or his stepson Thutmose III, who became one of the most famous Egyptian warrior-kings, his modest tomb suggests his legacy may not have been as widely celebrated as others in his dynasty.

    The tomb’s location is also intriguing, as it is near the tombs of royal wives, including the cliff tomb of Hatshepsut, which was prepared for her when she was still a royal wife.

    Thutmose II’s mummy was discovered in the so-called Royal Cache in Deir el-Bahari in 1881, alongside other royal mummies. Many royal mummies were relocated here for protection from flooding and during the uncertain times of the 21st Dynasty (circa 1077–950 BCE), some 400–500 years after Thutmose II’s original burial.

    However, experts suspect Thutmose II’s tomb might have been emptied even earlier due to flooding from a waterfall above it.

    The two of us speculate another tomb may have been built for him, and is still awaiting discovery.

    An 1881 photograph of some of the coffins and mummies found in DB320, taken before the mummies were unwrapped.
    Wikimedia

    Ultimately, Thutmose II’s reign remains shrouded in mystery due to the lack of available records. The search for his tomb – from Western Valley, through the Valley of the Kings, all the way to Deir el-Bahari – spanned centuries.

    Despite its poorly preserved state, and its scarcity compared with Tutankhamun’s splendorous tomb, this discovery will expand our understanding of the overlooked figure of Thutmose II, and the role he played in setting up the reign of Hatshepsut – arguably the most successful of the four female pharaohs.

    In fact, paving the way for the ascent of Hatshepsut may have been his greatest contribution.

    Anna M. Kotarba-Morley receives funding from Australian Research Council and previously received funding from National Centre of Science in Poland.

    Katarzyna Kapiec receives funding from National Science Centre in Poland

    ref. It’s the biggest Egyptian tomb discovery in a century. Who was Thutmose II? – https://theconversation.com/its-the-biggest-egyptian-tomb-discovery-in-a-century-who-was-thutmose-ii-250432

    MIL OSI – Global Reports

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Man charged over fatal Brooker Avenue crash

    Source: Tasmania Police

    Man charged over fatal Brooker Avenue crash

    Friday, 21 February 2025 – 2:00 pm.

    Police have charged a 19-year-old Plenty man with manslaughter and causing grievous bodily harm in relation to a fatal crash on the Brooker Avenue, Hobart last year.
    The crash occurred in the early hours of 21 July 2024.
    The man was arrested and charged this week after an extensive investigation.
    He is due to appear in the Hobart Magistrates Court on 28 May 2025.

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI Australia: New Adelaide facility will fast track cancer treatment for children

    Source: University of South Australia

    21 February 2025

    UniSA Professor Richard D’Andrea and Associate Professor Lisa Ebert in the new lab.

    A new tissue culture facility has opened at UniSA today, helping to advance research into two of the most aggressive childhood cancers worldwide – brain tumours and acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

    Approximately 120 children and adolescents are diagnosed with brain cancer each year in Australia, making it the second most common cancer in children after leukemia. The prognosis for children under five is brutal, with 45% not surviving their disease.

    AML accounts for about 20% of childhood leukemia cases, affecting about 50 new children each year. The survival rate is higher – around 70% – but there is also a high rate of relapse and the existing treatment options leave long lasting effects.

    Researchers from the Centre for Cancer Biology (CCB) – an alliance between SA Pathology and the University of South Australia – have welcomed a $36,100 grant from Cops for Kids to help transform an unused space in UniSA’s flagship health research precinct into a much-needed tissue culture facility.

    CCB Professor of Leukemia Biology Richard D’Andrea says the facility will be an invaluable resource for childhood cancer researchers located in the Bradley Building on North Terrace in the health and biomedical precinct.

    “Cellular immunotherapy is an emerging field in childhood cancer treatment and the research to develop and optimise this involves tissue culture to grow and study cells in a specialised laboratory space under sterile conditions,” Prof D’Andrea says.

    Immunotherapy – using the patient’s own immune cells to fight cancer – is now considered the fourth pillar of cancer treatment alongside surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy.

    Prof D’Andrea says children with AML who are treated with intensive chemotherapy suffer many long-term implications due to the toxic effects of treatment.

    “For some, this aggressive treatment does not provide a cure, so better treatments are badly needed to improve outcomes for these children.

    “With a cellular immunotherapy approach, immune cells obtained from a patient or from a cord blood source can be engineered or manipulated in the laboratory and used to eradicate the cancer cells, which is less toxic for the patient.”

    Prof D’Andrea and his CCB team are collaborating with researchers from the University of Queensland to advance the cellular immunotherapy approach to treat childhood AML.

    Associate Professor Lisa Ebert, Group Leader of Cancer Immunotherapy Research at CCB, will use the tissue culture lab to further her team’s research into paediatric brain cancer, focusing on engineering CAR T-cells, a form of immunotherapy.

    “Our main focus is on a type of childhood brain cancer called DMG, or diffuse midline glioma, which is rare, but also uniformly fatal, usually within 12 months of diagnosis because it is inoperable,” Assoc Prof Ebert says.

    “Chemotherapy doesn’t work, and radiotherapy only extends their lifespan by a couple of months, so it’s a really horrible disease.

    “However, we are currently working with Sydney Children Hospital’s network to conduct a clinical trial using CAR T-cells and based on results from the US running similar trials, we are seeing some very exciting results, which could lead to an effective treatment.”

    The Cops for Kids donation was inspired by a conversation between an Adelaide police officer and Kelly Stevens, founder of the Charlie’s Rainbow initiative that funds paediatric AML research at UniSA.

    Senior Constable First Class Genevieve Cullinan, a neighbour, friend and client of hairdresser Kelly Stevens, said she was touched by Kelly’s courage to establish a charity honouring her son Charlie, who died of AML in 2021 at three years of age.

    “Despite Kelly’s immense loss and overwhelming sorrow, she has found the strength to create this amazing charity, Charlie’s Rainbow, which has raised hundreds of thousands of dollars for AML research in the past four years,” Cullinan says.

    Cullinan is one of 2000 current and former SAPOL members who contribute a small amount from their fortnightly pay to help improve children’s quality of life in South Australia.

    The police officer will join the Cops for Kids Board, Kelly Stevens, and CCB researchers in an official launch of the new tissue culture laboratory in UniSA’s Bradley Building at 11am today.

    Donations to paediatric cancer research at UniSA can be made using the following links:

    https://giving.unisa.edu.au/donate-to-charlies-rainbow-aml-research/ (for AML research)
    https://giving.unisa.edu.au/donate-to-centre-for-cancer-biology/ (for brain cancer research)

    100% of all donations are spent directly on cancer research at UniSA.

    …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

    Media contact: Candy Gibson M: +61 434 605 142 E: candy.gibson@unisa.edu.au

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI Security: 434th ARW joins partner nations at Cope North 2025

    Source: United States INDO PACIFIC COMMAND

    The 434th ARW joined the Tanker Task Force to provide air refueling support to the U.S. Pacific Air Forces, U.S. Marine Corps, Royal Australian Air Forces, and Japanese Air Self Defense Force during the annual exercise held at Andersen Air Force Base, Guam.

    “Grissom is playing a key role in support of PACAF’s role in defending the Indo-Pacific,” said Lt. Col. Brian Thompson, 434th Operations Support Squadron commander. “We have been absolutely pivotal in providing fuel to primary F-35s, as well as EA-18G Growlers, F-16 Wild Weasels and the fan favorite B-1 Lancer.”

    The 434th ARW’s role in CN25 is to project airpower, execute the mission and win the fight, which takes a team, according to 1st Lieutenant Robert Grasmick, 434th Logistics Readiness Squadron operations officer.

    “If we can project Grissom air power to the Indo-Pacific and integrate with the joint force to execute our combined mission, then we make the joint force more robust and agile,” Grasmick said. “Thus, giving us the edge to win any engagement.”

    The Heartland Warriors hit the ground running, integrating themselves with active duty troops and gaining realistic experience supporting large-force deployment operations.

    “I have really enjoyed seeing so many career fields work together in order to make the mission possible,” said Senior Airman Ashlyn Hunter, 434th Operations Support Squadron aircrew flight equipment technician. “I think Cope North is a great training exercise and helps all career fields melt into one Air Force.”

    As reservists, deploying to participate in Cope North, and similar exercises hones the warfighting ethos and gives an unparalleled advantage in the field. Grasmick also notes that by teaming up with their Japanese and Australian counterparts, Airmen build upon their existing knowledge and skill sets to become more adaptable and well-rounded fighting forces.

    “By expanding our real-world training on an island in the Pacific,” said Grasmick, “It makes us that much more potent of an asset when called upon.”

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Global: Creative progress or mass theft? Why a major AI art auction is provoking wonder – and outrage

    Source: The Conversation – Global Perspectives – By Jessica Herrington, Futures Specialist, School of Cybernetics, Australian National University

    Thirty-four artworks created with artificial intelligence (AI) have gone up for sale at Christie’s in New York, in the famed auction house’s first collection dedicated to AI art.

    Christie’s says the collection aims to explore “human agency in the age of AI within fine art”, prompting viewers to question the evolving role of the artist and of creativity.

    Questions are not all the collection has prompted: there has also been a backlash. At the time of writing, more than 6,000 artists have signed an open letter calling on Christie’s to cancel the auction.

    What’s in the collection?

    Sougwen Chung’s Study 33 (2024) was created through a process that captured data from an EEG headset and a computer vision system tracking body movement and fed it to a painting robot called D.O.U.G._4.
    Sougwen Chung / Christie’s

    The Augmented Intelligence collection, up for auction from February 20 to March 5, spans work from early AI art pioneers such as Harold Cohen through to contemporary innovators such as Refik Anadol, Vanessa Rosa and Sougwen Chung.

    The showcased pieces vary widely in their use of AI. Some are physical objects, some are digital-only works – sold as non-fungible tokens or NFTs – and others are offered as both digital and physical components together.

    Some have a performance aspect, such as Alexander Reben’s Untitled Robot Painting 2025 (to be titled by AI at the conclusion of the sale).

    After generating an initial image tile, the work iteratively expands outwards, growing with each new bid in the auction. As the image evolves digitally, it is translated onto a physical canvas by an oil-painting robot. The price estimate for the work ranges from US$100 to US$1.7 million, and at the time of writing the bid sits at US$3,000.

    Alexander Reben’s Untitled Robot Painting 2025 involves art generated by AI and painted by robot as bids come in.
    Alexander Reben / Christie’s

    Claims of exploitation

    The controversy surrounding this show is not surprising. Debates over the creation of AI art have simmered ever since the technology became widely available in 2022.

    The open letter calling for the auction to be cancelled argues that many works in the exhibition use “AI models that are known to be trained on copyrighted work without a license”.

    Embedding Study 1 & 2 (from the xhairymutantx series) (2024) by Holly Herndon and Matt Dryhurst explores the concept of ‘Holly Herndon’ in generative AI models.
    Holly Herndon and Matt Dryhurst / Christie’s

    The letter says:

    These models, and the companies behind them, exploit human artists, using their work without permission or payment to build commercial AI products that compete with them.

    The models in question include popular image generators such as Stable Diffusion, Midjourney and DALL-E.

    The letter continues:

    [Christie’s] support of these models, and the people who use them, rewards and further incentivizes AI companies’ mass theft of human artists’ work.

    Copyright and cultural appropriation

    Refik Anadol’s Machine Hallucinations – ISS Dreams (2021) is a video work used an AI model trained on publicly available images taken from the International Space Station.
    Refik Anadol / Christie’s

    There are several attempts by artists to bring legal proceedings against AI companies underway. As yet, the key question remains unresolved: by training AI models on existing artworks, do AI models infringe artists’ copyright, or is this a case of fair use?

    Artists who are critical of AI are rightly concerned about losing their incomes, or their skills becoming irrelevant or outdated. They are also concerned about losing their creative community – their place in the creative ecosystem.

    Last year, Indigenous artists withdrew from a Brisbane art prize, highlighting concerns about AI and cultural appropriation.

    At the same time, many AI artists don’t use copyrighted material. Refik Anadol, for instance, has stated that his work in the Christie’s collection was made using publicly available datasets from NASA.

    How the ‘work’ of art is changing

    The Christie’s event occurs during a major shift in what it means to be an artist, and to be creative. Some participants in the show even question whether the label of “artist” is even necessary or required to make meaningful imagery and artefacts.

    Many non-artists may wonder – if AI is used, where is the real “work” of art? The answer is that many forms of work will look different in the age of AI, and creative endeavours are no exception.

    Creativity gave humans an evolutionary edge. What happens if society censors or undermines certain forms of creativity?

    Pindar Van Arman’s Emerging Faces (2017) was created via two AI agents: one attempted to generate images of faces, while the other stopped the process as soon as it recognised the image as a face.
    Pindar Van Arman / Christie’s

    Clinging to traditional ideas about how things are done ignores the bigger picture. When used thoughtfully, technology can stretch our creative potential.

    And AI cannot make art without human artists. Creating with new technologies requires context, direction, meaning, and an aesthetic sense.

    In the case of the Christie’s auction, artists are doing much more than typing in prompts. They iterate with data, refine models, and actively shape the end result.

    This evolving relationship between humans and machines reframes the creative process, with AI becoming more like a “conversational partner”.

    What now?

    Calling for the Christie’s auction to be cancelled may be shortsighted. It oversimplifies a complex issue and sidesteps deeper questions about how we should think about authorship, what authenticity means, and the evolving relationship between artists and the tools they use.

    Whether we embrace or resist AI art, the Christie’s auction pushes us to rethink artistic labour and the creative process.

    At the same time, Christie’s may need to take more care to produce collections that are sensitive to contemporary issues. Artists have real concerns about loss of work and income. A “move fast and break things” approach feels ill-suited to the thoughtfulness associated with artistic production.

    Harold Cohen’s Untitled (i23-3758) (1987) was produced with the groundbreaking AARON image-generating AI system.
    Harold Cohen / Christie’s

    Beyond protest, more education and collaboration is required overall. Artists who do not adapt to new technologies and ways of creating may be left behind.

    Equally important is ensuring AI does not diminish human agency or exploit creatives. Discussions around achieving sustainable and inclusive AI could follow other sectors focusing on equally sharing benefits and having rigorous ethical standards.

    Examples might come from the open source community (and organisations such as the Open Source Initiative), where licensing and frameworks allow contributors to benefit from collective development. And in the tech realm, some software companies (such as IBM) do stand out for their rigorous approach to ethics.

    Rather than cancelling the Christie’s auction, perhaps this is a moment for us to reimagine how we do creativity and adapt with AI.

    But are artists – and audiences – prepared for a future where the nature of being an artist, and creativity itself, is radically different?

    Jessica Herrington does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. Creative progress or mass theft? Why a major AI art auction is provoking wonder – and outrage – https://theconversation.com/creative-progress-or-mass-theft-why-a-major-ai-art-auction-is-provoking-wonder-and-outrage-250157

    MIL OSI – Global Reports

  • MIL-OSI Global: Trump is ruling like a ‘king’, following the Putin model. How can he be stopped?

    Source: The Conversation – Global Perspectives – By William Partlett, Associate Professor of Public Law, The University of Melbourne

    A month in, and it is clear even to conservatives that US President Donald Trump is attempting to fundamentally reshape the role of the American president.

    Trump and his supporters sees the natural authority of the American president in broad terms, similar to those of the Russian president, or a king. Trump, in fact, has already likened himself to a king.

    This desire to “Russify” the presidency is not an accident: Trump and many of his supporters admire the king-like power that Vladimir Putin exercises as Russian president.

    Understanding how Trump is attempting to transform presidential power is key to mobilising in the most effective way to stop it.

    Decrees by a ‘king’

    Russia’s system of government is what I call a “crown-presidential” system, which makes the president a kind of elected king.

    Two powers are central to this role.

    First, like a king, the Russian “crown-president” does not rely on an elected legislature to make policy. Instead, Putin exercises policy-making authority unilaterally via decree.

    Putin has used decrees to wage wars, privatise the economy and even to amend the constitution to lay claim to the parts of Ukraine occupied by Russia since 2014.

    He has also used these decrees in a performative way, for example, by declaring pay raises for all Russian state employees without any ability to enforce it.

    Over the last month, Trump has made similar use of decrees (what the White House now terms “presidential actions”).

    He has issued scores of presidential decrees to unilaterally reshape vast swathes of American policy – far more than past presidents. Trump sees these orders as a way of both exercising and demonstrating his vast presidential power.

    Control over the bureaucracy

    Second, like a king, Putin does not allow the Russian legislature to use the law to organise the executive branch and create agencies independent of presidential control. Instead, he has unquestioned dominance over both the organisation and staffing of the executive branch. This has given him vast power to dominate politics by controlling information gathering and legal prosecutions.

    A similar push is underway in the United States. Trump has appointed key loyalists to head the Department of Justice and Federal Bureau of Investigation.

    Moreover, he is seeking to restructure the executive branch by abolishing some agencies altogether and vastly reducing the size of the workforce in others.

    Can the courts stop Trump?

    Trump’s attempt to Russify the American presidency undermines the American constitutional order.

    Courts are the natural “first responders” in this kind of crisis. And many courts have blocked some of Trump’s early decrees.

    This legal response is important. But it is not enough on it own.

    First, the US Supreme Court might be more willing to accept this expansion of presidential power than lower courts. In a ruling last year, for example, the court granted the president immunity from criminal prosecution, showing itself to be sympathetic to broad understandings of executive power.

    Second, presidential decrees can be easily withdrawn and modified. This can allow Trump and his legal team to recalibrate as his decrees are challenged and find the best test cases to take to the Supreme Court.

    Third, parts of the conservative right have long argued for a far more powerful president. For instance, the idea of a “unitary executive” has been discussed in conservative circles for years. This essentially claims that the president should be able to direct and control the entire executive branch, from the bureaucracy to prosecutors to the FBI.

    These arguments are already being made to justify Trump’s actions. As Elon Musk has said, “you could not ask for a stronger mandate from the public” to reform the executive branch. These arguments will be made to courts to justify Trump’s expansion of power.

    Fourth, even if the Supreme Court does block some decrees, it is possible the White House will simply ignore these actions. We had an early glimpse of this when Trump posted that “He who saves his Country does not violate any Law”.

    Vice President JD Vance has also said judges “aren’t allowed” to block the president’s “legitimate power”.

    The importance of political mobilisation and messaging

    Trump’s aggressive use of presidential power is not just a constitutional crisis, it is a political one. For those seeking to resist, this is too important to just be left to the courts; it must also involve America’s key political institutions.

    The most obvious place to start is in Congress. Lawmakers must act decisively to assert the legal power granted to them in the constitution to check the power of the presidency. This would include active Congressional use of its budgeting power, as well as its oversight powers on the presidency.

    This could happen now if a few Republicans were to take a principled position on important constitutional issues, though nearly all have so far preferred to fall in line. Democrats could retake both branches of Congress in the midterm elections in 2026, though, and assert this power.

    The states can and should also act to resist this expansion of presidential power. This action could take many forms, including refusing to deploy their traditional police powers to enforce decrees they view to be unconstitutional or unlawful.

    In mobilising to defend the constitution, these institutions could appeal to the American people with more than the narrow legal argument that Trump’s acts are unconstitutional. They could also make the broader political argument that turning the American president into a Russian-style, elected king will foster a form of inefficient, unresponsive and corrupt politics.

    Or, in the words of The New York Times columnist Ezra Klein, “it’s the corruption, stupid”.

    Time is of the essence. Russia shows the more time a “crown-president” is able to operate, the more entrenched this system becomes. For those hoping to preserve American democracy, the time is now for not just legal, but political resistance.

    William Partlett does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. Trump is ruling like a ‘king’, following the Putin model. How can he be stopped? – https://theconversation.com/trump-is-ruling-like-a-king-following-the-putin-model-how-can-he-be-stopped-249721

    MIL OSI – Global Reports

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Changes to electoral laws [21 February 2025]

    Source: Australian Electoral Commission

    AECMedia

    Updated: 21 February 2025

    New electoral reforms have recently been passed by the Australian Parliament. 

    The Electoral Legislation Amendment (Electoral Reform) Act 2025 received Royal Assent on, Thursday 20 February 2025. The amendments cover the following two areas:

    • the Commonwealth funding and disclosure scheme 
    • Electoral process (machinery) amendments. 

    Financial disclosure reforms: 2026 commencement 

    Australia’s electoral funding and disclosure scheme will be significantly reformed with the reduction of the disclosure threshold to $5,000, the introduction of expedited donation disclosures as well as donation caps and expenditure caps.

    These reforms will commence on 1 July 2026, meaning they will not be in effect for the 2025 federal election.

    Acting Electoral Commissioner Jeff Pope said that the legislative amendments are substantial – the largest in nearly 40 years for funding and disclosure. 

    “The implementation of these reforms is very significant for the AEC – we’re undertaking extensive preparation for changes to our processes, resourcing, tools and systems to successfully deliver the changes,” Mr Pope said.

    Process improvements for the 2025 federal election 

    The machinery amendments are legislative changes that assist the AEC in the modernisation of electoral processes.

    Mr Pope said that these amendments provide improvements for both the AEC in administering the election, and for voters. These changes will be in place for the 2025 federal election.

    “These changes include improvements for voters with a disability and strengthening the appropriate regulation of conduct at polling places,” Mr Pope said.

    Specific examples include: 

    • A change to the terminology of ‘unsound mind’, which many have found an offensive term, to more contemporary language
    • Expressly expanding the grounds for pre-poll and postal voting to people with a disability and their carers
    • Prohibition of filming inside a polling place without permission.

    “Work is underway on the implementation of these and other changes that support a modernised electoral process in preparation for the 2025 federal election,” said Mr Pope.

    Media resource  

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-Evening Report: It’s the biggest Egyptian tomb discovery in a century. Who was Thutmose II?

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Anna M. Kotarba-Morley, Senior Lecturer in Museum and Curatorial Studies / Research Fellow, University of Adelaide

    Wikimedia/The Conversation

    Archaeologists in Egypt have made an exciting discovery: the tomb of Pharaoh Thutmose II, a ruler who has long been overshadowed by his famous wife and half-sister, Queen Hatshepsut.

    The remarkable find is located in the Western Valley (a burial ground for queens rather than kings), near the complex of Deir el-Bahari, which houses the funerary temple of Hatshepsut. Both of us worked together as archaeologists at this spectacular site some 15 years ago.

    Thutmose II’s tomb has been labelled the first, and biggest, discovery of a royal tomb since Tutankhamun’s tomb was found just over 100 years ago.

    Despite being totally empty, it’s a crucial element in further understanding a transformative period in ancient Egyptian history.

    Hatshepsut’s forgotten brother and husband

    Thutmose II (also called Akheperenre) reigned in the first half of the 15th century BCE. This made him the fourth ruler of the 18th Egyptian Dynasty, which marked the beginning of the New Kingdom period.

    Thutmose II likely ruled for a little over ten years, although some scholars believe his reign may have lasted only three years.

    He was the son of a great pharaoh Thutmose I and his lesser wife, Mutnofret. He married his half-sister Queen Hatshepsut according to the royal custom, to solidify the rule and bloodline. Together they had a daughter named Nefrure.

    Thutmose II’s mummy was discovered in 1881 but his original tomb was unknown until now.
    Wikimedia

    Upon his death, his wife Hatshepsut became the sixth pharaoh of the 18th Dynasty – and arguably one of the most famous and successful female rulers of all time.

    Military activities

    As the successor of Thutmose I, Thutmose II continued his father’s military policy in the southern regions of Egypt.

    According to preserved inscriptions, he ordered the brutal suppression of a rebellion against Egyptian rule in the land of Kush (in present-day north Sudan). As a result, a significant number of prisoners were brought to Egypt – possibly as part of a campaign.

    But Thutmose II’s military campaigns were minor in comparison to the grand conquests of his predecessors and successors. Most historians believe he was a weak ruler and that Hatshepsut had a major role in governing the country, even long before his death. However, others contest this.

    Thutmose II’s short reign left modest traces of building activity in Karnak, one of the largest religious centres in ancient Egypt, located in present-day Luxor.

    The structure, of which only fragments survive, features a unique decoration depicting Thutmose II, Hatshepsut as his royal wife before she became a ruler, and their daughter Nefrure. The origins of the monument are uncertain. It’s possible Thutmose II started it and Hatshepsut finished it.

    The monument was reconstructed by French researchers and can now be admired at the Open Air Museum in Karnak.

    Karnak is one of the most important religious centres in Ancient Egypt.
    Katarzyna Kapiec

    Other monuments of Thutmose II were found in the southern regions of Egypt, such as in Elephantine, in the city of Aswan, and in northern Sudan (likely connected to his military campaigns).

    The condemnation of Hatshepsut’s memory

    Interestingly, the name of Thutmose II became strongly associated with many of Hatshepsut’s constructions due to the actions of Thutmose III.

    Regarded as one of the greatest warriors, military commanders and military strategists of all time, Thutmose III was the nephew and stepson of Hatshepsut, and co-ruled with her as a regent.

    At the end of Thutmose III’s reign, some 20 years after Hatshepsut’s death, he carried out a large-scale campaign to remove or alter Hatshepsut’s names and images. Scholars call this “damnatio memoriae”, or condemnation of the memory.

    An example of Hatshepsut’s ‘damnatio memoriae’ at Deir el-Bahari. Hatshepsut’s cartouches (left) were defaced, while Thutmose III’s (right) remained untouched.
    Wikimedia

    This was likely due to concerns about securing the throne for his successor, Amenhotep II, by linking him to his male ancestors.

    In many cases, Hatshepsut’s name was replaced with that of Thutmose II, making him the principal celebrant in temples built by Hatshepsut, such as in Deir el-Bahari.

    View at the temple of Hatshepsut at Deir el-Bahari at the dawn.
    Katarzyna Kapiec

    What does Thutmose II’s empty tomb tell us?

    The newly discovered tomb reveals fresh details about the status of Thutmose II and his role in the sociopolitical structure of 15th century BCE Egypt – a period of territorial expansion, wealth and political intrigue. It also sheds light on the perception of his rule at the time.

    Thutmose II has been painted as an ineffectual ruler. And the latest findings don’t contradict this.

    Unlike his father Thutmose I, who expanded Egypt’s reign through military strength, or his stepson Thutmose III, who became one of the most famous Egyptian warrior-kings, his modest tomb suggests his legacy may not have been as widely celebrated as others in his dynasty.

    The tomb’s location is also intriguing, as it is near the tombs of royal wives, including the cliff tomb of Hatshepsut, which was prepared for her when she was still a royal wife.

    Thutmose II’s mummy was discovered in the so-called Royal Cache in Deir el-Bahari in 1881, alongside other royal mummies. Many royal mummies were relocated here for protection from flooding and during the uncertain times of the 21st Dynasty (circa 1077–950 BCE), some 400–500 years after Thutmose II’s original burial.

    However, experts suspect Thutmose II’s tomb might have been emptied even earlier due to flooding from a waterfall above it.

    The two of us speculate another tomb may have been built for him, and is still awaiting discovery.

    An 1881 photograph of some of the coffins and mummies found in DB320, taken before the mummies were unwrapped.
    Wikimedia

    Ultimately, Thutmose II’s reign remains shrouded in mystery due to the lack of available records. The search for his tomb – from Western Valley, through the Valley of the Kings, all the way to Deir el-Bahari – spanned centuries.

    Despite its poorly preserved state, and its scarcity compared with Tutankhamun’s splendorous tomb, this discovery will expand our understanding of the overlooked figure of Thutmose II, and the role he played in setting up the reign of Hatshepsut – arguably the most successful of the four female pharaohs.

    In fact, paving the way for the ascent of Hatshepsut may have been his greatest contribution.

    Anna M. Kotarba-Morley receives funding from Australian Research Council and previously received funding from National Centre of Science in Poland.

    Katarzyna Kapiec receives funding from National Science Centre in Poland

    ref. It’s the biggest Egyptian tomb discovery in a century. Who was Thutmose II? – https://theconversation.com/its-the-biggest-egyptian-tomb-discovery-in-a-century-who-was-thutmose-ii-250432

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Man charged over Preston firearms seizure

    Source: Tasmania Police

    Man charged over Preston firearms seizure

    Friday, 21 February 2025 – 1:09 pm.

    A 23 year old Preston man has been charged with dealing in firearms after a firearm seizure earlier this month.
    Two homemade firearms and a gel blaster were seized during the targeted search on 6 February.
    The man has since been arrested and charged with multiple firearms offences including dealing in firearms, possessing a firearm without a licence, failing to take reasonable precautions with a firearm, and possessing an unregistered firearm.
    He was remanded in custody to appear in the Devonport Magistrates Court in March.
    Anyone with information about illegal firearms should contact police on 131 444 or Crime Stoppers on 1800 333 000 or at crimestopperstas.com.au. Information can be provided anonymously.

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-Evening Report: Trump is ruling like a ‘king’, following the Putin model. How can he be stopped?

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By William Partlett, Associate Professor of Public Law, The University of Melbourne

    A month in, and it is clear even to conservatives that US President Donald Trump is attempting to fundamentally reshape the role of the American president.

    Trump and his supporters sees the natural authority of the American president in broad terms, similar to those of the Russian president, or a king. Trump, in fact, has already likened himself to a king.

    This desire to “Russify” the presidency is not an accident: Trump and many of his supporters admire the king-like power that Vladimir Putin exercises as Russian president.

    Understanding how Trump is attempting to transform presidential power is key to mobilising in the most effective way to stop it.

    Decrees by a ‘king’

    Russia’s system of government is what I call a “crown-presidential” system, which makes the president a kind of elected king.

    Two powers are central to this role.

    First, like a king, the Russian “crown-president” does not rely on an elected legislature to make policy. Instead, Putin exercises policy-making authority unilaterally via decree.

    Putin has used decrees to wage wars, privatise the economy and even to amend the constitution to lay claim to the parts of Ukraine occupied by Russia since 2014.

    He has also used these decrees in a performative way, for example, by declaring pay raises for all Russian state employees without any ability to enforce it.

    Over the last month, Trump has made similar use of decrees (what the White House now terms “presidential actions”).

    He has issued scores of presidential decrees to unilaterally reshape vast swathes of American policy – far more than past presidents. Trump sees these orders as a way of both exercising and demonstrating his vast presidential power.

    Control over the bureaucracy

    Second, like a king, Putin does not allow the Russian legislature to use the law to organise the executive branch and create agencies independent of presidential control. Instead, he has unquestioned dominance over both the organisation and staffing of the executive branch. This has given him vast power to dominate politics by controlling information gathering and legal prosecutions.

    A similar push is underway in the United States. Trump has appointed key loyalists to head the Department of Justice and Federal Bureau of Investigation.

    Moreover, he is seeking to restructure the executive branch by abolishing some agencies altogether and vastly reducing the size of the workforce in others.

    Can the courts stop Trump?

    Trump’s attempt to Russify the American presidency undermines the American constitutional order.

    Courts are the natural “first responders” in this kind of crisis. And many courts have blocked some of Trump’s early decrees.

    This legal response is important. But it is not enough on it own.

    First, the US Supreme Court might be more willing to accept this expansion of presidential power than lower courts. In a ruling last year, for example, the court granted the president immunity from criminal prosecution, showing itself to be sympathetic to broad understandings of executive power.

    Second, presidential decrees can be easily withdrawn and modified. This can allow Trump and his legal team to recalibrate as his decrees are challenged and find the best test cases to take to the Supreme Court.

    Third, parts of the conservative right have long argued for a far more powerful president. For instance, the idea of a “unitary executive” has been discussed in conservative circles for years. This essentially claims that the president should be able to direct and control the entire executive branch, from the bureaucracy to prosecutors to the FBI.

    These arguments are already being made to justify Trump’s actions. As Elon Musk has said, “you could not ask for a stronger mandate from the public” to reform the executive branch. These arguments will be made to courts to justify Trump’s expansion of power.

    Fourth, even if the Supreme Court does block some decrees, it is possible the White House will simply ignore these actions. We had an early glimpse of this when Trump posted that “He who saves his Country does not violate any Law”.

    Vice President JD Vance has also said judges “aren’t allowed” to block the president’s “legitimate power”.

    The importance of political mobilisation and messaging

    Trump’s aggressive use of presidential power is not just a constitutional crisis, it is a political one. For those seeking to resist, this is too important to just be left to the courts; it must also involve America’s key political institutions.

    The most obvious place to start is in Congress. Lawmakers must act decisively to assert the legal power granted to them in the constitution to check the power of the presidency. This would include active Congressional use of its budgeting power, as well as its oversight powers on the presidency.

    This could happen now if a few Republicans were to take a principled position on important constitutional issues, though nearly all have so far preferred to fall in line. Democrats could retake both branches of Congress in the midterm elections in 2026, though, and assert this power.

    The states can and should also act to resist this expansion of presidential power. This action could take many forms, including refusing to deploy their traditional police powers to enforce decrees they view to be unconstitutional or unlawful.

    In mobilising to defend the constitution, these institutions could appeal to the American people with more than the narrow legal argument that Trump’s acts are unconstitutional. They could also make the broader political argument that turning the American president into a Russian-style, elected king will foster a form of inefficient, unresponsive and corrupt politics.

    Or, in the words of The New York Times columnist Ezra Klein, “it’s the corruption, stupid”.

    Time is of the essence. Russia shows the more time a “crown-president” is able to operate, the more entrenched this system becomes. For those hoping to preserve American democracy, the time is now for not just legal, but political resistance.

    William Partlett does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. Trump is ruling like a ‘king’, following the Putin model. How can he be stopped? – https://theconversation.com/trump-is-ruling-like-a-king-following-the-putin-model-how-can-he-be-stopped-249721

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-Evening Report: Creative progress or mass theft? Why a major AI art auction is provoking wonder – and outrage

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Jessica Herrington, Futures Specialist, School of Cybernetics, Australian National University

    Thirty-four artworks created with artificial intelligence (AI) have gone up for sale at Christie’s in New York, in the famed auction house’s first collection dedicated to AI art.

    Christie’s says the collection aims to explore “human agency in the age of AI within fine art”, prompting viewers to question the evolving role of the artist and of creativity.

    Questions are not all the collection has prompted: there has also been a backlash. At the time of writing, more than 6,000 artists have signed an open letter calling on Christie’s to cancel the auction.

    What’s in the collection?

    Sougwen Chung’s Study 33 (2024) was created through a process that captured data from an EEG headset and a computer vision system tracking body movement and fed it to a painting robot called D.O.U.G._4.
    Sougwen Chung / Christie’s

    The Augmented Intelligence collection, up for auction from February 20 to March 5, spans work from early AI art pioneers such as Harold Cohen through to contemporary innovators such as Refik Anadol, Vanessa Rosa and Sougwen Chung.

    The showcased pieces vary widely in their use of AI. Some are physical objects, some are digital-only works – sold as non-fungible tokens or NFTs – and others are offered as both digital and physical components together.

    Some have a performance aspect, such as Alexander Reben’s Untitled Robot Painting 2025 (to be titled by AI at the conclusion of the sale).

    After generating an initial image tile, the work iteratively expands outwards, growing with each new bid in the auction. As the image evolves digitally, it is translated onto a physical canvas by an oil-painting robot. The price estimate for the work ranges from US$100 to US$1.7 million, and at the time of writing the bid sits at US$3,000.

    Alexander Reben’s Untitled Robot Painting 2025 involves art generated by AI and painted by robot as bids come in.
    Alexander Reben / Christie’s

    Claims of exploitation

    The controversy surrounding this show is not surprising. Debates over the creation of AI art have simmered ever since the technology became widely available in 2022.

    The open letter calling for the auction to be cancelled argues that many works in the exhibition use “AI models that are known to be trained on copyrighted work without a license”.

    Embedding Study 1 & 2 (from the xhairymutantx series) (2024) by Holly Herndon and Matt Dryhurst explores the concept of ‘Holly Herndon’ in generative AI models.
    Holly Herndon and Matt Dryhurst / Christie’s

    The letter says:

    These models, and the companies behind them, exploit human artists, using their work without permission or payment to build commercial AI products that compete with them.

    The models in question include popular image generators such as Stable Diffusion, Midjourney and DALL-E.

    The letter continues:

    [Christie’s] support of these models, and the people who use them, rewards and further incentivizes AI companies’ mass theft of human artists’ work.

    Copyright and cultural appropriation

    Refik Anadol’s Machine Hallucinations – ISS Dreams (2021) is a video work used an AI model trained on publicly available images taken from the International Space Station.
    Refik Anadol / Christie’s

    There are several attempts by artists to bring legal proceedings against AI companies underway. As yet, the key question remains unresolved: by training AI models on existing artworks, do AI models infringe artists’ copyright, or is this a case of fair use?

    Artists who are critical of AI are rightly concerned about losing their incomes, or their skills becoming irrelevant or outdated. They are also concerned about losing their creative community – their place in the creative ecosystem.

    Last year, Indigenous artists withdrew from a Brisbane art prize, highlighting concerns about AI and cultural appropriation.

    At the same time, many AI artists don’t use copyrighted material. Refik Anadol, for instance, has stated that his work in the Christie’s collection was made using publicly available datasets from NASA.

    How the ‘work’ of art is changing

    The Christie’s event occurs during a major shift in what it means to be an artist, and to be creative. Some participants in the show even question whether the label of “artist” is even necessary or required to make meaningful imagery and artefacts.

    Many non-artists may wonder – if AI is used, where is the real “work” of art? The answer is that many forms of work will look different in the age of AI, and creative endeavours are no exception.

    Creativity gave humans an evolutionary edge. What happens if society censors or undermines certain forms of creativity?

    Pindar Van Arman’s Emerging Faces (2017) was created via two AI agents: one attempted to generate images of faces, while the other stopped the process as soon as it recognised the image as a face.
    Pindar Van Arman / Christie’s

    Clinging to traditional ideas about how things are done ignores the bigger picture. When used thoughtfully, technology can stretch our creative potential.

    And AI cannot make art without human artists. Creating with new technologies requires context, direction, meaning, and an aesthetic sense.

    In the case of the Christie’s auction, artists are doing much more than typing in prompts. They iterate with data, refine models, and actively shape the end result.

    This evolving relationship between humans and machines reframes the creative process, with AI becoming more like a “conversational partner”.

    What now?

    Calling for the Christie’s auction to be cancelled may be shortsighted. It oversimplifies a complex issue and sidesteps deeper questions about how we should think about authorship, what authenticity means, and the evolving relationship between artists and the tools they use.

    Whether we embrace or resist AI art, the Christie’s auction pushes us to rethink artistic labour and the creative process.

    At the same time, Christie’s may need to take more care to produce collections that are sensitive to contemporary issues. Artists have real concerns about loss of work and income. A “move fast and break things” approach feels ill-suited to the thoughtfulness associated with artistic production.

    Harold Cohen’s Untitled (i23-3758) (1987) was produced with the groundbreaking AARON image-generating AI system.
    Harold Cohen / Christie’s

    Beyond protest, more education and collaboration is required overall. Artists who do not adapt to new technologies and ways of creating may be left behind.

    Equally important is ensuring AI does not diminish human agency or exploit creatives. Discussions around achieving sustainable and inclusive AI could follow other sectors focusing on equally sharing benefits and having rigorous ethical standards.

    Examples might come from the open source community (and organisations such as the Open Source Initiative), where licensing and frameworks allow contributors to benefit from collective development. And in the tech realm, some software companies (such as IBM) do stand out for their rigorous approach to ethics.

    Rather than cancelling the Christie’s auction, perhaps this is a moment for us to reimagine how we do creativity and adapt with AI.

    But are artists – and audiences – prepared for a future where the nature of being an artist, and creativity itself, is radically different?

    Jessica Herrington does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. Creative progress or mass theft? Why a major AI art auction is provoking wonder – and outrage – https://theconversation.com/creative-progress-or-mass-theft-why-a-major-ai-art-auction-is-provoking-wonder-and-outrage-250157

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-OSI Canada: Senior leadership appointment in the Government of Yukon public service

    Senior leadership appointment in the Government of Yukon public service
    zaburke

    Premier Ranj Pillai has made a senior leadership appointment. 

    Paul Moore’s appointment as interim Deputy Minister of Energy, Mines and Resources has been extended at pleasure for up to three months. The Energy, Mines and Resources portfolio will continue to be divided between the acting Deputy and interim Deputy Ministers.

    Moore will be responsible for Land Planning, Land Management, Agriculture, Energy, Geothermal and Petroleum Resources, Forest Management, Strategic Alliances, Policy, Human Resources, Communications, Finance and Information Management.

    Van der Meer will continue to be responsible for Mineral Resources, Yukon Geological Survey, Assessment and Abandoned Mines and Compliance, Monitoring and Inspection.  
     

    Backgrounder

    Paul Moore has many years of public service experience with municipal, First Nations and territorial governments including director of the Human Resource and Education for the Tr’ondëk Hwëch’in First Nation, and the chief administrative officer for the City of Dawson. He joined the Government of Yukon in 2008 as director of Community Affairs and then became assistant deputy minister of Community Development. He has served as the Deputy Minister for Community Services, Deputy Minister of Energy, Mines and Resources and most recently as the Public Service Commissioner. He holds a Bachelor of Arts from the University of Victoria and a Master of Arts in Conflict Analysis and Management from Royal Roads University.

    MIL OSI Canada News

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Dumbleton crocodile sighting – Mackay

    Source: Government of Queensland

    Issued: 20 Feb 2025

    Open larger image

    A trap has been set for the animal after a slide mark was seen

    Open larger image

    Large slide mark on the bank of the Pioneer River on 18 February 2025

    A crocodile that has moved into freshwater above the Dumbleton Weir in the Mackay region will be targeted for removal from the Pioneer River.

    On 15 February 2025, a member of the pubic reported what they believed to be a crocodile to the Department of the Environment, Tourism, Science and Innovation.

    Wildlife officers investigating the sighting report photographed a large slide mark on the bank of the Pioneer River on 18 February 2025.

    Senior Wildlife officer Jane Burns said recent crocodile sighting signs have been installed in the area, and a spotlight search was conducted on 19 February 2025.

    “I would like to thank the person who reported the crocodile to the department, and I can assure the community that the animal will be targeted for removal from the wild,” Ms Burns said.

    “During our spotlight search last night, we did not confirm the presence of a large crocodile above the weir, but a baited trap will be set today.

    “The Mackay region is known Croc Country, and people should expect crocodiles in all water bodies even if there are no signs.

    “Crocodiles are highly mobile, and they can get around built structures like the Dumbleton Weir. We believe this animal moved into the area above the weir during the recent weather event.

    “I urge people to be Crocwise while this animal is targeted for removal from the wild, and I’m asking everyone to avoid swimming above the Dumbleton Weir while the trap is in the water.

    “The animal might make its way downstream of its own accord, but if we successfully remove this animal from the wild, people still need to be Crocwise in the Mackay region.

    “People are responsible for their own safety in Croc Country and should make sensible choices around the water.

    “I’d like to encourage everyone in the community to make a sighting report if they see what they believe to be a crocodile.”

    Crocodile sightings can be reported by using the QWildlife app, completing a crocodile sighting report on the DETSI website, or by calling 1300 130 372. The department investigates every crocodile sighting report received.

    Crocwise tips for people in Croc Country:

    • Expect crocodiles in ALL northern and far northern Queensland waterways even if there is no warning sign
    • Obey all warning signs – they are there to keep you safe
    • Be aware crocs also swim in the ocean and be extra cautious around water at night
    • Stay well away from croc traps – that includes fishing and boating
    • The smaller the vessel the greater the risk, so avoid using canoes and kayaks
    • Stand back from the water’s edge when fishing and don’t wade in to retrieve a lure
    • Camp as far back from the water’s edge as possible
    • Never leave food, fish scraps or bait near the water, camp sites or boat ramps
    • Never provoke, harass or feed crocs
    • Always supervise children near the water and keep pets on a lead.

    View further information on being Crocwise.

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Telstra found to have misled nearly 9,000 Belong customers over broadband speed claims

    Source: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission

    The Federal Court has today found that Telstra made false or misleading representations relating to the upload speed of residential broadband internet services supplied to nearly 9,000 of its Belong customers, following court action by the ACCC.

    In October and November 2020, Telstra migrated 8,897 customers who were on a Belong NBN plan with a maximum download speed of 100 megabits per second (Mbps) and a maximum upload speed of 40Mbps, to a service with a maximum upload speed of 20Mbps.

    Telstra did not notify customers of the reduction in the maximum upload speed in their service. “Telstra’s failure to inform customers that their broadband service had been altered denied them the opportunity to decide whether the changed service was suitable for their needs,” ACCC Commissioner Liza Carver said.

    “There was no reduction to the price Telstra charged its customers even though the cost charged by NBN Co to Telstra was $7 a month less for the new, lower speed service.”

    Telstra admitted that it had represented to 2,785 of the Belong customers, who acquired the 40 Mbps plan between 1 May 2017 and 19 September 2018, that they were receiving a Belong NBN Broadband service with a maximum upload speed of 40Mbps, when they were not.  

    Telstra continued to make these representations by failing to update customers once the unilateral migration had occurred. Telstra acknowledged its failure in 2021 and provided a one-off $90 credit to these consumers.

    The Court also found that Telstra had made false or misleading representations to a further 6,112 Belong customers who had acquired the 40mbps plan between 20 September 2018 and October 2020.

    While Telstra never stated the maximum upload speed to these customers, the Court found that these consumers would have reasonably construed the service to which they were bound was the same in all material aspects, including upload speed, as it had always been.

    “It is simply unacceptable for a supplier of essential services to mislead consumers when reducing the quality of the services it is providing to its customers,” Ms Carver said.

    “We expect better from the country’s largest retail broadband internet service provider and believe these customers, who ultimately received a service they did not agree to, should be compensated.”

    The ACCC is seeking declarations, penalties, consumer redress, costs and other orders.

    The Court will determine the penalty and any consumer redress after a hearing on a date to be fixed.

    Background

    Telstra is Australia’s largest telecommunications supplier, supplying the largest number of retail broadband internet services and owning the largest mobile network over which it supplies both retail and wholesale services. It is a publicly listed company, incorporated in Australia.

    Belong was launched by Telstra in 2013 as a low-cost mobile and internet service provider, operating semi-independently in a number of areas, including products, marketing, service, billing and parts of IT.

    Upload speed refers to the speed at which an internet connection can allow data to be sent from personal devices to the internet, such as sending files, presentations or media content when working or studying from home or sharing photos and videos.

    In May 2020, NBN Co launched new wholesale consumer speed tiers, including a new 100/20Mbps wholesale speed tier, which costs retail service providers $7 less per month than the 100/40Mbps plan on a wholesale level.   

    The ACCC instituted these Federal Court proceedings against Telstra in December 2022.

    The ACCC has previously instituted proceedings against Telstra on several occasions, including in August 2021 for making alleged false or misleading representations in their promotions of some 50Mbps and 100Mbps NBN plans. Telstra was subsequently ordered to pay $15 million in penalties in that case.

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI Australia: (WIP) Big batteries in 2025: the market evolution continues

    Source: Allens Insights

    Another big year for BESS 12 min read

    Utility-scale batteries reached new heights in 2024, achieving several industry firsts. Milestones include the first project-financed virtual offtake agreement and long-term energy service agreement (LTESA), coupled with inventive approaches to revenue stack structuring. As investor interest intensifies, the future of battery storage looks promising.

    This latest Insight on the Australian big battery market delves into the recent trends, the potential opportunities and hurdles for this rapidly evolving industry.

    Key takeaways

    • Project financing of battery energy storage system (BESS) projects is on the rise, with an increasingly sophisticated market, a widening pool of sponsors and diverse range of investment structures.
    • Virtual offtake agreements are dominating the offtake market, giving developers greater flexibility in their revenue stack and opportunities for equity upside through market arbitrage.
    • Interest in the Capacity Investment Scheme and LTESAs is increasing and contributing to projects reaching financial close.
    • Equity investors continue to be attracted to standalone and co-located BESS projects, as well as investment in the hardware and software of a battery.

    What we are seeing in the market

    A growing number of battery projects achieved financial close across the past year and project finance has continued to be the dominant approach. We have seen significant greenfield and operational battery projects financed on a standalone basis and as part of hybrid projects, as well as portfolio-based financings. 

    Key examples of this trend are the renewables portfolio financings for Global Power Generation, FRV and Neoen, all of which included battery projects as part of the technology mix. Akaysha Energy’s standalone financing of its Orana Battery Energy Storage System marked a financing for the largest four-hour BESS in Australia’s National Energy Market (NEM), and one of the largest in the world. 

    The continued support in the project finance market for battery storage projects has been driven by a range of factors, including:

    • a widening pool of sponsors—and, in some cases, extremely strong sponsors—who are investing in the technology;
    • a diverse range of investment structures and rationales, which have seen developers and sponsors raise debt financing for batteries on a standalone and portfolio basis, or as part of co-located or hybrid projects. In some cases, this has been motivated by a business pivot or expansion in response to an increasing need to couple projects with intermittent generation sources with a firming energy source or, more generally, net zero and decarbonisation objectives; and
    • increasing sophistication and experience of developers, contractors and other stakeholders in relation to procurement and contracting strategy, trading strategy, management of interface and gap risk in the context of split contracting, and innovation in revenue structures.

    These trends have been accompanied by—and, in some ways, conducive to—an expanding range of financiers (including mainstream commercial banks, government lenders and other non-bank lenders) participating in financings for battery projects; a greater understanding from lenders of technology and degradation risk; and a greater market acceptance of split contracting structures and non-traditional revenue structures as bankable.

    Throughout 2024 we observed a marked increase in the development and adoption of virtual offtake agreements as a preferred offtake structure. Notable examples are Neoen’s Western Downs BESS and Victorian Big Battery, and, as mentioned earlier, Akaysha’s Orana BESS. 

    A virtual offtake agreement decouples the financial offtake from the physical project. The project company may therefore choose not to follow the instructions of the offtaker and instead operate the BESS according to its own internal trading strategy, but it must still settle the financial swap on pre-agreed terms, regardless of battery capacity and how much the battery is charged or discharged. 

    From the project company’s perspective, unlike a traditional physical toll, it retains control of the physical battery. This increases the opportunities for equity upside through trading arbitrage. The structure also facilitates greater flexibility for a single project to procure offtake agreements with multiple offtakers. It may also be compatible with hybrid or co-located projects in need of multiple offtakers for different components of the project.

    Virtual offtakes are not, however, for everyone. Both the owner and the offtaker need sophisticated trading teams to allow them to make the most of the virtual arrangements and to reduce the risk of making losses. Similarly, developers who want to sell out of a project prior to financial close may want to consider whether a virtual offtake agreement could limit the potential buyer pool to those that have the technical capability to trade the asset.

    In considering this type of structure from a financing perspective, lenders will be focused on mitigating the potential downside exposure in circumstances where physical trading by the project company underperforms against the virtual nominations, eroding actual base case revenue against revenue assumptions against which debt is sized.  

    Providing lenders with appropriate oversight and protections (including, if required, agreed trading protocols), while providing sufficient room for equity to seek upside opportunities, will be the key to building broader market acceptance of the bankability of non-traditional revenue structures such as virtual offtake agreements.

    Last year saw the Federal Government launch the first five tenders in its Capacity Investment Scheme, which wrapped in a tender for the NSW Government’s LTESAs.

    Each tender round has been oversubscribed, indicating a strong appetite from project developers to secure a government underwriting contract such as a Capacity Investment Scheme Agreement (CISA) or an LTESA

    While these underwriting contracts have typically been viewed by project financiers as welcome enhancements, they have traditionally been seen as a ‘nice-to-have’ feature, with the primary focus of lenders being on whether the project has the benefit of a traditional tolling or offtake agreement. At most, we saw sponsors and borrowers proposing to recognise CISAs and LTESAs acting as a floor against any potential market risk (either due to the residual life of the BESS past the offtake tenor or for partially contracted assets). 

    More recently, we are seeing lenders develop a greater understanding of how such agreements can underpin forecast project cashflows in a way that enables higher weighting to be placed on them as a certain and bankable revenue line in the base case financial model. This approach is often supported by tailored protections that are agreed in the debt documents, such as:

    • undertakings around how the project activates and manages its rights to receive support payments;
    • information undertakings, to provide lenders with appropriate visibility over the operation of the underwriting agreement during the facility term; and
    • cash reserving requirements, to facilitate the project maximising the benefit of underwriting agreements, while providing for a buffer should there be a need to meet any payment obligations back to the counterparty (eg reconciliation payments or rebates).

    As more government underwriting agreements are awarded under the LTESA and CISA schemes, there will be an increasing number of projects in the market where such agreements are a feature of the revenue profile. We expect that market acceptance of this approach will continue to broaden over time.

    Split contracting has established itself as the market standard for BESS projects, with sponsors and financiers becoming significantly more comfortable with managing and banking the interface risks between battery supply and balance of plant (BOP) scope.

    Commissioning, handover, defects, security, liability caps and liquidated damages coverage continue to be key areas of focus in negotiations, gaps analysis and bankability assessments. However, the issues, and the related mitigation strategies and contingencies, are now well understood.

    As the BESS split contracting structure has matured, we have also begun to see sponsors with a portfolio of upcoming BESS and other renewables projects seek to partner informally with preferred battery suppliers and/or BOP contractors across that pipeline—the goal being to expedite procurement timeframes, secure production slots and standardise terms across their portfolio.

    With BESS projects increasingly being co-developed with related solar/wind projects (either greenfield or expansions), we also expect to see an increase in a common BOP contractor delivering both the battery and solar/wind BOP scope. At this stage, the BOP scope usually remains ringfenced between assets (eg there is a BESS BOP contract and a solar BOP contract). However, we expect to see sponsors push towards a single hybrid project BOP contract covering both assets, to seek to streamline contracting terms and construction programs on hybrid projects.

    In order to ensure that the structure is bankable, project financiers require a rigorous gaps analysis process underpinning the contract negotiations, along with confidence in the capability and experience of the contractors themselves. The need for a robust gaps analysis does mean more substantial engagement with financiers, and sponsors and developers have had to factor this into the overall transaction timetable. However, the continued rise in standard terms contracts from certain contractors in the market may facilitate efficiencies in the due diligence process, especially on portfolio-based financings.

    Investors continue to be attracted to BESS assets. Unsurprisingly, the reasons for their increasing investment appeal are similar to why we are seeing more and more BESS projects reach financial close.

    These factors enable BESS owners to diversify and maximise revenue output from their renewable energy portfolios. Coupled with favourable investment characteristics for BESS assets, such as lower capex costs and shorter development timelines (particularly when compared with other renewable asset types), we expect to see investment appetite for BESS assets continue to grow.

    In the Australian M&A market, this investor appetite has manifested primarily in the form of co-location ‘add-ons’—where vendors looking to sell a solar or wind project have added a BESS development opportunity to the project. If the BESS can be developed on the project’s existing land footprint, the ‘add-on’ process is relatively simple (other than for the connection process, which continues to cause headaches for developers), and the project up for sale can be rebranded as a co-located wind/solar and BESS project, unlocking for the buyer the various new revenue streams. For the vendor, those additional revenue streams mean a higher purchase price.

    What’s on the horizon

    Recognition of sub-investment grade offtakers?

    The offtaker’s credit quality will continue to be a focus for lenders when assessing BESS projects. However, as a greater range of offtakers enter the market, we can expect more frequent proposals for financiers to consider counterparties that may not have the credit ratings that would typically be required for a bankable project.

    We are seeing this area incrementally develop. This is particularly so in renewables portfolio financings, where certain sub-investment grade offtakers may be recognised and given greater weighting (and, in some cases, equivalent to an investment grade offtaker) as part of debt sizing cashflows, subject to appropriate percentage caps and other criteria being met.

    Opportunities for fully merchant BESS projects

    A further example of the evolving market for BESS financings may be found in the recent Amp Energy project financing of a fully merchant BESS project by commercial bank lenders and Export Development Canada. While we have certainly seen project financings for BESS projects with merchant exposure, those projects have typically included at least some contracted revenue component (whether through a tolling agreement, virtual power purchase agreement, LTESA or revenue risk-sharing agreement). 

    This makes the Amp transaction an interesting market development. Depending on the project and the sponsor, the debt model on the Amp transaction may not be feasible for all sponsors and developers, given that a fully merchant BESS compared with a contracted BESS would necessarily mean more conservative debt sizing, at least in the short term. However, for certain sponsors with strong equity backing, where a high percentage of equity is available to be contributed to individual projects, and where there are challenges or other commercial reasons for not procuring an offtake, a fully merchant-based project financing may still be attractive. 

    Whether this means we will see a growing number of merchant BESS project financings is unclear. The Australian Energy Market Operator (AEMO) forecasts energy storage capacity in the NEM will increase from approximately 2GW at the end of 2024 to nearly 7GW by the end of 2025.1 As more BESS projects come online over time, there may be fewer arbitrage and other similar revenue opportunities. 

    At least in the short term, we expect this may lead to certain sponsors and developers more closely exploring opportunities to raise debt against BESS projects that are fully merchant or that have substantial merchant exposure.

    Investment in BESS platforms and core components

    A growing trend is the investment in BESS-specific investment platforms. While only a limited number have come to market in Australia so far (including the recent ZEBRE BESS platform announced by ZEN Energy and HDRE), we have worked with a number of investors who are looking at opportunities in this space. Investors are drawn to the benefits of BESS projects described above and the potential to accelerate the growth of those benefits when they are aggregated on a portfolio basis.

    We have also seen increased investment interest in core BESS components, including:

    • the hardware—as rival technologies, focused on cost efficiency and safety, are emerging to challenge lithium-based batteries; and
    • the software—focusing in particular on storage and discharge optimisation.

    While the current focus from investors in these core BESS components appears to be on systems designed for the residential and commercial and industrial markets, the ambition for a number of these technologies is to scale up to the utility-scale BESS market.

    Commencement of the GO Scheme

    The Guarantee of Origin Scheme (the GO Scheme) is set to commence in 2025, bringing with it new tradeable certificates in the form of Renewable Energy Guarantee of Origin (REGO) certificates. Unlike large-scale generation certificates, REGOs will be able to be created by energy storage systems (such as batteries) where there is a ‘direct supply relationship’ with an eligible renewable energy facility.

    In addition, REGOs will be time-stamped, meaning they will record the hour of the day in which they were generated. This will allow temporal matching of electricity generation and consumption, and will likely drive a price differentiation between eg REGO certificates generated at 1pm when there is excess solar generation and 1am when renewable energy supply is scarce.

    The introduction of REGO certificates presents an interesting opportunity, and a potential new revenue source, for BESS projects.

    More information on the GO Scheme can be found in our previous Insight.

    Revenue implications from AEMO’s market interventions

    Under the National Electricity Rules, AEMO has powers to issue mandatory ‘directions’ to registered participants in the NEM in relation to the operation of their facilities. This is not uncommon, and is primarily used by the market operator to manage periods of volatility in the market and maintain the reliability standard. Participants are subsequently reimbursed for their compliance via a well-established compensation framework administered by AEMO.

    AEMO has indicated that it intends to use its directions power on battery operators to address the increasingly commonplace minimum system load issues— eg by directing an operator to fully discharge batteries early in the morning and to hold the batteries at minimum charge during the morning, with the direction lifted in the early afternoon.

    However, there are growing concerns that this directions compensation model is not fit for purpose for standalone batteries and other energy storage technologies. The financial model for a standalone BESS is particularly reliant on taking advantage of exactly these periods of financial volatility in the market, and AEMO’s directions compensation framework may not be appropriate in providing adequate financial redress for the opportunity cost that is lost by virtue of being required to comply with an AEMO direction.

    Following the AEMC’s ‘Review into electricity compensation frameworks’, the final report for which was published in December 2024 and can be found here, we expect there to be continued discussions on this issue, to ensure that BESS operators are fairly compensated for AEMO’s market interventions.

    Vanadium flow as an emerging alternative to lithium-ion?

    As the BESS market expands, we expect to see competing technologies emerge as alternatives to lithium-ion batteries. The WA Government recently announced $150 million of funding to develop a 50MW / 500MWh vanadium flow battery (VFB) in Kalgoorlie, which would be Australia’s largest VFB. While VFBs have been mooted for a number of years as a potential utility-scale alternative to lithium-ion batteries, the first (and largest) ‘commercial’ VFB in Australia (a 2MW / 8MWh battery) was only commissioned in mid-2023, as part of the Spencer Energy Project.

    The key roadblocks to the widespread adoption of utility-scale VFBs seem to be higher upfront costs compared with lithium-ion batteries (vanadium is heavily used in steel refining, which creates price and supply chain volatility), and lower roundtrip efficiency of around 70–85% (compared with 90–95% for lithium-ion batteries).

    Despite this, VFBs seemingly provide a number of commercial benefits compared with lithium-ion batteries. In particular, VFBs offer longer storage duration (between 8–12 hours), and the theoretical ability to discharge completely and for an unlimited number of times without significant degradation (providing a much longer and consistent asset life). Further, VFBs are said to be safer (and fire resistant), and storage capacity can be easily increased by adding more electrolyte. At scale and over time, these benefits could help drive a significantly lower LCOE. The WA Government’s funding may be the catalyst to cut upfront costs and kickstart VFBs as a leading alternative to lithium-ion batteries.

    The continuing evolution

    As we look ahead, it is clear that 2025 promises to be another exciting year for the BESS sector. We expect to see more diverse, and growing, opportunities for battery projects, including across construction contracting, revenue structures, project and portfolio-based financing, and M&A. 

    If you would like to hear more about what we’re seeing in the market, please contact any of the team members below.

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI Australia: NSW Government funds expanded support services in response to spike in antisemitic incidents

    Source: New South Wales Government 2

    Headline: NSW Government funds expanded support services in response to spike in antisemitic incidents

    Published: 21 February 2025

    Released by: Prime Minister of Australia, Minister for Multiculturalism


    In response to a recent surge in antisemitic incidents targeting Jewish neighbourhoods and synagogues, the NSW Government is committing $200,000 to Jewish House to expand their vital community support services.

    This funding will contribute to essential crisis intervention, mental health support, and community assistance in response to the rise of antisemitism in NSW.

    For more than 40 years, Jewish House has been a leader in crisis care, providing help to vulnerable members of the Jewish community when they need it most.

    Since the recent outbreak of antisemitic attacks across our state, Jewish House has seen a significant increase in requests for support and assistance from across the state.

    This funding further reinforces the NSW Government’s commitment to combating antisemitism and racism by ensuring those affected receive the care and assistance they need while holding those responsible for these heinous acts accountable.

    This follows reforms that the NSW Government introduced to parliament this sitting fortnight that confront hate speech and antisemitism by establishing a new criminal offence for intentionally inciting racial hatred, while also protecting places of worship and further criminalising Nazi symbols.

    NSW Premier Chris Minns said:

    “The recent attacks on the Jewish community have no place in our society. These acts are deeply distressing and we’re working around the clock to make sure those responsible face the full force of the law while supporting the community with essential services like these.

    “This funding will see Jewish House expand its support services, providing guidance, practical advice and emotional care to the community.”

    Minister for Multiculturalism Steve Kamper said:

    “No community should be made to feel fearful in NSW. When any part of our society is threatened, it is a challenge for us all, but the Government remains committed to safeguarding social cohesion against hate and division.”

    “This announcement today will help a community organisation that is empowering the Jewish community to look after each other and create a more compassionate and understanding community. “

    Jewish House Chief Executive Rabbi Mendel Kastel OAM said:

    “The recent rise in antisemitic incidents have caused fear and hurt throughout our community. As a result, we’re seeing a significant increase in requests for help.”

    “At Jewish House we can provide resources, guidance and tools to stand tall in the face of adversity.

    “The funding will allow us to expand our vital services and continue to provide the essential support that is very much needed right now.”

    MIL OSI News