NewzIntel.com

Category: Australia

  • MIL-OSI Australia: $150 million to make SEQ an innovation powerhouse

    Source: Australian Executive Government Ministers

    South East Queensland (SEQ) is set to become an innovation powerhouse thanks to more than $150 million of investment in infrastructure to boost the region’s innovation economy.

    The SEQ Innovation Economy Fund is part of the $1.8 billion SEQ City Deal, a partnership between the Australian Government, Queensland Government and Council of Mayors (SEQ), which aims to improve the accessibility, prosperity and liveability of the region – home to around four million residents.  

    Eligible local governments, industry, public and private entities can now apply for funding for capital projects that will deliver new and improved innovation infrastructure in SEQ and help grow high-value, knowledge-intensive jobs across the region.

    The Australian and Queensland Governments have committed $50 million each to create the fund, with at least $50 million in co-contributions required from industry.

    The fund aims to support capital projects which will:

    • develop infrastructure within existing SEQ innovation precincts to accelerate the delivery of high value, future-focussed employment opportunities
    • grow the SEQ innovation economy through the development and commercialisation of innovative products, services or processes using new and sustainable technologies
    • develop new and leverage existing partnerships that strengthen the SEQ innovation economy to drive greater economic, environmental and social outcomes for the region.

    Funding of up to $25 million is available for major capital projects that include new builds, extensions or refurbishments of innovation infrastructure, the purchase and installation of new equipment, or innovation-specific expansions to current capital projects.

    Funding of up to $5 million is available for minor capital projects including refurbishments and the purchase and installation of new equipment. 

    Applications for the SEQ Innovation Economy Fund close 22 November 2024. More information can be found at https://advance.qld.gov.au/grants-and-programs/innovation-economy-fund.

    Quotes attributable to Federal Minister for Cities Jenny McAllister:

    “We want to help grow South East Queensland’s innovation economy.

    “Investing in future technologies and industries will drive innovation, create more high value job opportunities and make South East Queensland an even more exciting place to work and live.”

    “The Albanese Government is working closely with our state and local government partners to deliver initiatives that benefit the community and support the local economy.”

     Quotes attributable to Queensland Minister for State Development and Infrastructure Grace Grace:

    “The SEQ City Deal is a partnership between three levels of government with the aim of supporting jobs, improving connectivity and preserving and enhancing the SEQ region’s liveability.

    “SEQ is an emerging economic powerhouse, with thriving industries and businesses offering new opportunities for employment and business growth for liveable and sustainable communities for the future.

    “The SEQ Innovation Economy Fund will help local governments, industry, public and private entities deliver new and improved innovation infrastructure in SEQ and help grow high-value jobs across the region.”

    Quotes attributable to Queensland Minister for Science and Innovation Leanne Linard:

    “The Queensland Government is committed to building a groundbreaking and thriving innovation economy in South East Queensland.

    “Brisbane, in particular, is one of the fastest growing tech hubs in the country, with more than 185,000 residents expected to be employed in tech hub industries by 2030.

    “This investment by the SEQ Innovation Economy Fund will drive further growth in our critical innovation industries and accelerate the creation of new and exciting knowledge-intensive jobs of the future.”

    MIL OSI News –

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Federation’s THRIVE program helping upskill regional healthcare workers

    Source: Federation University

    Federation University Australia researchers are upskilling regional and rural healthcare workers to manage and prevent chronic diseases with behavioural change techniques.

    Backed by funding from the Department of Education and Training, Federation’s “The Healthy Regions Intervention” (THRIVE) program is training doctors, nurses and health practitioners in a method called Motivational Interviewing (MI), to help people at risk of chronic illness, and those already diagnosed, to adopt healthier lifestyles.

    In the past 18 months, the THRIVE program has trained 127 Victorian practitioners and clinical researchers and plans to double this number in the next 18 months.

    Healthcare workers participating in the program are equipped with advanced behaviour change expertise to assist sufferers of chronic diseases including cardiovascular disorders, hypertension, metabolic disorders, respiratory disorders, mental health disorders and cancers, with the aim to change risk behaviours including poor diet, lack of exercise, illicit drug use, and smoking, which can greatly exacerbate the impact of these conditions.

    Participating agencies include Silverchain, Ballarat Community Health, East Grampians Health Service, Goulburn Valley Community Health, Rural City of Ararat, Western Alliance: Academic Health Science Centre, as well as independent practitioners. Federation physiotherapy students now also receive advanced MI training, preparing them to help their future patients and communities.

    The THRIVE MI training is based on the Happy Life Club initiative which also been delivered in partnership with regional and national governments in Beijing, Nanjing, and Shenzhen, China, where it has won a China National Health Innovation Award.

    THRIVE is led by Distinguished Professors Colette Browning and Shane Thomas and Professors Fadi Charchar and Britt Klein and was established in 2022 to support rural and regional Victorian communities. THRIVE not only provides training but also conducts important research and has contributed to global guidelines on managing hypertension and published over 70 scientific papers.

    Quote attributable to Federation University Australia Executive Dean, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, and Pro Vice-Chancellor, Research, Professor Remco Polman

    “Behaviour change is a key tool in reducing global rates and burden of chronic diseases and many healthcare workers lack advanced training. Well-implemented behaviour change programs delivered by skilled practitioners, such as THRIVE provides, offer substantial health benefits to the community. Motivational Interviewing has proven to be very effective and cost-efficient in significantly improving patient outcomes.”

    MIL OSI News –

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Labor delivers biggest ever back-to-back surpluses

    Source: Australian Treasurer

    The Final Budget Outcome for 2023–24 shows the Albanese Government’s responsible economic management has delivered a second consecutive budget surplus.

    The Albanese Government has delivered the first back‑to‑back surpluses in nearly two decades.

    Today’s underlying cash surplus of $15.8 billion (0.6 per cent of GDP) follows the $22.1 billion (0.9 per cent of GDP) surplus delivered in 2022–23.

    In dollar terms, these are the biggest back‑to‑back surpluses on record.

    This means Labor has delivered the largest nominal improvement in the budget position in a Parliamentary term.

    Our back‑to‑back surpluses are helping in the fight against inflation, and that’s been acknowledged by the RBA Governor.

    The government’s budget strategy strikes the right balance between fighting inflation, rolling out responsible cost‑of‑living relief, supporting growth in our economy and strengthening public finances.

    The budget position has improved by $172.3 billion across the past two years compared to what we inherited from our predecessors.

    The stronger budget position means gross debt is $149.1 billion lower in 2023–24 than what was forecast at the election, which means we avoid around $80 billion in interest costs over the decade.

    The surplus is larger than what was forecast at the time of the 2024–25 Budget entirely due to lower payments, not higher taxes.

    In fact, compared to what was forecast at the budget, the tax take went down, not up.

    Payments are $10.2 billion lower than forecast, largely driven by lower demand for some programs and delays in some payments.

    Tax receipts are $5.3 billion lower than forecast, with a challenging outlook ahead as global economic uncertainty has weighed on the prices of our key commodities.

    We’ve been able to turn two big Liberal deficits into two big Labor surpluses because of our responsible approach which includes a combination of banking revenue upgrades and spending restraint.

    We have returned 87 per cent of upwards revisions to tax receipts in 2023–24 since coming to Government. Our predecessors only returned around 40 per cent.

    The level of real payments is now lower than what we inherited. After falling 4.9 per cent in 2022–23, real payments grew in 2023–24 by 2.9 per cent. Real spending growth under our predecessors averaged 4.1 per cent.

    Since coming to Government, we’ve found $77.4 billion in savings and re‑prioritisations, including $12.2 billion in 2023–24, compared to zero expenditure savings in the last budget of our predecessors.

    Payments as a share of GDP were 25.2 per cent of GDP in 2023–24, lower than the 27.1 per cent of GDP forecast at the time of the election.

    If we took the same approach as our predecessors, we wouldn’t have come close to delivering back‑to‑back surpluses.

    We’ve delivered two surpluses at the same time as we’ve rolled out responsible cost‑of‑living relief including tax cuts for every taxpayer, energy bill relief for every household, cheaper medicines, cheaper child care and the first consecutive real increases to the maximum rates of Commonwealth Rent Assistance in three decades.

    While we’ve been able to deliver these surpluses, we know that structural pressures on the budget are intensifying rather than easing.

    We’ve taken decisive action to address some of the biggest structural spending pressures on the budget through our reforms to the National Disability Insurance Scheme and aged care system and our responsible budget management which means we avoid tens of billions of dollars in interest payments on the Liberal debt we inherited.

    Our economic plan is all about easing the cost of living and fighting inflation at the same time as we lay the foundations for a stronger economy for the future, and back‑to‑back budget surpluses help on each of these fronts.

    MIL OSI News –

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Interview with Steve Cannane, RN Breakfast, ABC Radio

    Source: Australian Treasurer

    STEVE CANNANE:

    With interest rates not budging and the Reserve Bank Governor remaining cautious about the sticky inflation figures, the federal government has been eager to find some good economic news, and today, no doubt, they’ll be talking up the Final Budget Outcome for last financial year, which confirms the government has delivered the first back‑to‑back budget surpluses in almost 2 decades, with a surplus of $15.8 billion, which is higher than expected.

    The latest update comes as the federal Treasurer Jim Chalmers has returned from Beijing where he co‑chaired the Australia‑China Strategic Economic Dialogue, and he joins us now. Treasurer, thanks for coming on.

    JIM CHALMERS:

    Thanks for the opportunity, Steve. How are you?

    CANNANE:

    I’m very well, thanks. We’ll come to the economy and your trip to China in a moment. But, first, we have seen an escalation over the weekend in the Middle East with attacks from Israel on targets in Lebanon and now Yemen. How concerned are you and the government about a broader regional conflict breaking out in the Middle East?

    CHALMERS:

    Very concerned. We don’t for one second mourn the death of a leader of a terrorist organisation, but we do mourn the deaths of innocent victims, and too many innocent lives have been lost already. That’s why we need a ceasefire so that the senseless killing of families stops.

    Our primary concern here is the human cost, but obviously a broader regional war, the escalation of this very troubling regional conflict, will have economic consequences as well.

    CANNANE:

    You are just back from China, and China has a series of economic challenges – the housing market is slumping, property developers have been going bust. It seems like the country may not meet its economic growth targets of 5 per cent. Did you see any evidence while you were there that they have got a sensible plan on how to deal with those problems?

    CHALMERS:

    Yes, I did. There couldn’t have been a more important time for us to restart our Strategic Economic Dialogue with China. It’s a really important part of stabilising the relationship, which is full of complexity and full of economic opportunity.

    While I was there the Chinese authorities announced some quite substantial steps when it comes to supporting growth in the Chinese economy. We’ve made it really clear that weakness in the Chinese economy has been a big concern for us. It’s a big part of the global economic uncertainty that we’re dealing with. The government’s efforts to support more economic activity in the Chinese economy, they are good for Australia and they’re very welcome.

    CANNANE:

    Steelmakers have been struggling in China. What impact will that continue to have on iron ore prices and the budget bottom line in Australia?

    CHALMERS:

    Already in the course of last week there were 2 key days – Tuesday and Thursday – and through the course of the week the iron ore price recovered a little bit, not a lot, but it recovered a little bit. That is a sign of the very positive response to the announcements made by the Chinese government, the Chinese authorities.

    They’ve got issues in the property sector which they are trying to address and trying to deal with. There are obviously issues with consumption, and so these efforts that they’re putting in to boost their economy, to support more activity in the economy, it’s a good thing for Australia.

    If you look at our Treasury forecasts in the Budget, we’re anticipating the weakest few years of Chinese growth really since that economy opened up in the late 1970s. That’s been a big concern for us. We’ve been upfront about that. Any efforts to try to turn that around in China is a good thing for us.

    CANNANE:

    We haven’t heard any announcements on the lifting of trade restrictions on Australian lobsters. Why is China being so stubborn around that export market?

    CHALMERS:

    A little bit more work to do, but we shouldn’t forget that of the $21 billion in trade restrictions, about $20 billion of those have been lifted because of the good work of the PM, Trade Minister Farrell and Foreign Minister Wong. Most of those trade restrictions have been lifted. That’s a good thing. We’ve got a bit more work to do on lobster, but I was able to convey directly to Chinese leaders that we want to see the speedy resolution of those issues.

    CANNANE:

    So why are they being stubborn on that particular market?

    CHALMERS:

    I wouldn’t necessarily describe it in that way. They’ve said –

    CANNANE:

    Except that you believe in free trade, so –

    CHALMERS:

    That’s why I welcome the fact that 20 of the $21 billion in restrictions have been lifted already. I want to see these trade restrictions lifted on lobster, no question about it. I conveyed that very directly to the Chinese leaders that I met with. There’s a little bit more work that our agencies are doing, our agriculture and trade authorities on both sides of the equation are working to try to get those last remaining restrictions lifted.

    CANNANE:

    Let’s move on to the Final Budget Outcome. In May you were predicting a budget surplus of $9.3 billion. The Final Budget Outcome for ’23–4 turned out to be a larger surplus of $15.8 billion. Why the difference?

    CHALMERS:

    The difference was explained entirely by less spending, not more revenue. We actually collected less revenue than we were anticipating at budget time, but spending was substantially down, and that’s what explains the bigger surplus that Katy Gallagher and I are releasing today.

    These 2 surpluses are an important demonstration of the responsible economic management which is a defining feature of our Albanese Labor government. These will be the first consecutive surpluses in almost 2 decades. In dollar terms we’re talking about the biggest budget improvement ever in a parliamentary term, and that’s because we’ve turned 2 very big Liberal deficits into 2 big Labor surpluses, and that’s a good thing.

    CANNANE:

    You said less spending. So what decisions have you made since May that have reduced spending?

    CHALMERS:

    There are a whole range of contributors to that lower spending figure. A large amount of it is demand‑driven programs. But what we’ve also shown over the course of our two‑and‑a‑bit years in government is we found almost $80 billion in savings.

    The key to these 2 surpluses is the fact that when we’ve got upward revisions to revenue because the labour market has been a bit stronger or our exports have been performing well, we’ve banked almost all of those upward revisions to revenue. If we hadn’t shown that spending restraint we wouldn’t be anywhere near these 2 consecutive surpluses for the first time in almost 2 decades.

    CANNANE:

    So, is it just underspending by certain government departments, or is it actual decisions that you’ve made since May to reduce spending?

    CHALMERS:

    The $80 billion in savings are decisions. The spending restraint is a decision. A substantial amount of the improvement since May is in demand‑driven programs. There is some underspending, and we detail that when we release all of the figures today.

    CANNANE:

    And to what degree is it as a result of higher than expected commodity prices? Because in that May Budget you did low ball the commodity prices estimates, didn’t you?

    CHALMERS:

    We always take a deliberately conservative approach to commodity prices, and that’s been warranted. In fact, in the last few months our commodity prices have been quite low. Sometimes they’ve actually been below the assumptions that we’ve put in the Budget.

    The improvement from our expectations of a surplus in May to the Final Budget Outcome that we’re reporting today is not about more revenue, it’s not about higher commodity prices, it’s not about more taxes. It’s about less spending. Our revenue has actually gone down from what we expected in May.

    CANNANE:

    So when you talk about these demand‑driven savings, are you talking about, for example, fewer welfare payments because employment is so strong? The unemployment rate is very low at the moment?

    CHALMERS:

    The unemployment rate has ticked up a bit since the middle of last year, but broadly, as we’ve expected, the economy is creating a lot of jobs.

    That’s a good prompt to remember that these 2 surpluses today are really important. They mean that there’s less debt and less interest to repay on that debt. But it’s part of a bigger story of progress that Australia has made in the last couple of years.

    We’ve created in this parliamentary term around a million jobs, inflation has halved, real wages are growing again, we’ve got tax cuts flowing to every taxpayer. These are all good developments, and we know that people are still doing it tough but the fact that we’re making progress, cleaning up the budget, providing cost‑of‑living relief, investing in housing and skills and energy and a Future Made in Australia, all of this together justifies the responsible approach that we are taking to the budget and to the economy.

    CANNANE:

    Okay. Let’s talk about the forecast for next year. There’s a forecast for a deficit of $28.3 billion. Is there any readjustment, and will you be trying to make that closer to a surplus to put more downward pressure on inflation and interest rates?

    CHALMERS:

    The numbers we’re releasing today are for the last year, not for the year that we’re in right now. We’ll update this year’s figure in the mid‑year budget update toward the end of the year in the usual way.

    But already this $28 billion deficit we’ve got currently for this year, that’s about $19 billion better than what it was expected to be when we came to office. It was a $47 billion deficit when we came to office. It’s now a $28 billion deficit, so even where –

    CANNANE:

    But those figures were based on coming out of a pandemic. So is that the kind of baseline you should be measuring yourself against?

    CHALMERS:

    Every government measures itself compared to what it inherited from its predecessors. We’ve made really quite extraordinary progress on the budget when it comes to cleaning up –

    CANNANE:

    But a pandemic is a once‑in‑a‑lifetime event. It’s not necessarily the fault of a previous government.

    CHALMERS:

    No, but for the year that we’re talking about, Steve, they’re talking about the forecasts for the post‑pandemic period. The year that we’re in now was not anticipated by our predecessors or by us to be impacted by the pandemic, which was at its worst a few years ago.

    We are talking here about a $172 billion improvement in just 2 years in the budget. That’s because we’ve shown spending restraint. We’ve banked upward revisions to revenue. We’ve found $80 billion in savings. We’ve taken the right economic decisions for the right economic reasons. Today’s Final Budget Outcome is a demonstration of that.

    CANNANE:

    Treasurer, can you just clear it up who asked for the Treasury advice on changes to negative gearing and capital gains tax and the policy implications of that?

    CHALMERS:

    As I made clear last week in Brisbane and then later in the week in Beijing, it’s not unusual for people in my job as treasurer to get advice on contentious issues. And I think –

    CANNANE:

    So you asked for it?

    CHALMERS:

    I get advice all the time on all the various issues in the economy, including negative gearing. That’s not especially unusual. I’ve said that already. I said that on Wednesday in Brisbane, said it on Friday in Beijing, saying it to you on Radio National Breakfast.

    CANNANE:

    But you’re not answering the question about whether you asked for that advice.

    CHALMERS:

    Sometimes the advice comes unprompted. Sometimes it’s sought by me.

    On this occasion, when there’s a contentious issue in the public domain and we’ve got a severe shortage of housing, of course treasurers get advice from their department on these sorts of issues. That’s what’s happened here. But as we’ve made very clear, Steve –

    CANNANE:

    So should we all assume that you did ask for it, then?

    CHALMERS:

    I get advised on it all the time. Sometimes it’s sought by me. Sometimes it’s provided in the course of things like the Tax Expenditure Statement that we release every year. But what I’m trying to convey to your listeners, Steve, is that this is not an unusual thing. This is a treasurer doing his job.

    We’ve made it really clear that we’ve got a housing policy already, and this isn’t part of it.

    CANNANE:

    So why is it a state secret about whether you asked for that advice or not?

    CHALMERS:

    It’s not. I’ve made it clear on a number of occasions now in the course of the best part of a week that I got this advice because it was a contentious issue, it was in the public domain and it was a big part of the parliamentary debate as well.

    CANNANE:

    Okay. Treasurer, we thank you for your time this morning.

    CHALMERS:

    Thanks for your time, Steve. All the best.

    CANNANE:

    Thanks a lot. Jim Chalmers, the Treasurer, talking to us there on Radio National Breakfast.

    MIL OSI News –

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Sydney Airport announces shake-up of Domestic Travel Essentials

    Source: Sydney Airport

    Monday 30 September 2024

    Sydney Airport is thrilled to announce that Lagardère AWPL has been awarded the Domestic Travel Essentials retail contract following a successful tender.

    The new retail offering which spans 2,500sqm across 14 locations will redefine the traditional news, books and convenience model by including technology and pharmacy, LEGO stores, and a new concept for Relay.

    The new stores will provide passengers with the opportunity to pick up the essentials across a number of convenient locations before they board.

    As part of the new retail offering, Sydney Airport will now showcase one of the largest Travel Essentials stores in Australia with a mega store of over 650sqm in T2 Domestic.

    Mark Zaouk, Group Executive Commercial at Sydney Airport, commented, “We’re flipping the script on the traditional travel essentials model to deliver a new and fresh concept for travellers who desire more from their airport experience at Australia’s busiest airport terminal.

    “Our goal is to create a collaborative environment where anything is possible, ensuring that customer service goes beyond five stars to deliver a world-class experience, and Lagardère AWPL’s creative vision aligns perfectly with that goal – we’re excited to see their plans realised at our domestic terminals.”

    Costa Kouros, LagardereAWPL CEO, said: “We are delighted to be awarded the Travel Essentials portfolio at T2 and T3 Domestic terminals at Sydney Airport.

    “Our new Travel Essentials offering at Sydney Airport will see the experience transform with the addition of new categories and products.

    “The new offerings will also showcase our commitment to sustainability, from material selection to waste and energy reduction.”

    This significant decision marks a transformative moment for the airport, setting the stage for a groundbreaking retail experience that goes far beyond the traditional news and books offering for the 27 million passengers who travel through the Domestic terminals each year.

    MIL OSI News –

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Health insurers rorting public hospital beds

    Source: New South Wales Government 2

    Headline: Health insurers rorting public hospital beds

    Published: 30 September 2024

    Released by: Treasurer, Minister for Health

    Private health insurers are skipping out on the cost of public hospital beds their members use, costing taxpayers and boosting their bottom line by $140 million a year.

    Currently, NSW public hospitals are heavily subsidising some private health insurers – a burden our health system can no longer shoulder.

    NSW Health estimates the average cost of a hospital bed at $1,075 per day.

    Last year, NSW Health charged private health insurers below cost, at a rate of $892 per hospital bed, per day – a 17 per cent subsidy.

    Many insurers are doing the right thing and paying for the full cost of services they use. However, a select group of private health insurers are not paying their fair share – many only contributing $474 per hospital bed, per day – a 56 per cent subsidy from the people of NSW.

    Private health insurers skipping out on the costs of public hospital beds is costing NSW hospitals $140 million every year – for the last five years.

    This could employ an additional 1,000 senior nurses.

    Thankfully, 44 of 53 private health insurers have agreed or are currently paying their fair share. But some of the largest insurers have held out, refusing to pay their fair share to the public health system while raking in record profits.

    Quotes attributable to Treasurer Daniel Mookhey:

    “The refusal of private insurers to pay their bills is robbing the public system of critical funds.

    “This has been a very reasonable request to private health insurers to simply resume paying their fair share.

    “I commend those smaller and not-for-profit insurers who are doing the right thing.”

    Quotes attributable to Minister for Health Ryan Park:

    “So many not-for-profit insurers have managed to do the right thing, including the health funds for police, nurses, navy and teachers.

    “I commend those insurers who have paid their bills in full as well as those who have indicated they will resume paying in full.

    “But we’re seeing some of the largest for-profit insurers, who enjoy billions of dollars in profit each year, sticking taxpayers with the tab.

    “This really is not sustainable.”

    MIL OSI News –

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Maitland Hospital welcomes new staff

    Source: New South Wales Government 2

    Headline: Maitland Hospital welcomes new staff

    Published: 30 September 2024

    Released by: Minister for Health

    Maitland Hospital has welcomed an influx of new team members including nurses, midwives, doctors and allied health professionals, as part of a major boost to workforce capacity in the region.

    Between July 2023 and September 2024, the hospital increased its number of full-time equivalent (FTE) staff by 10 per cent, growing by 121 FTE and bringing the total to 1,095 FTE.

    The staffing increase reflects Maitland’s growing appeal as a place to live and work, supported by the region’s expanding healthcare sector and the $470 million Hospital on Metford Road, which opened in March 2022.

    Maitland Hospital has worked hard to improve staff retention, build a supportive work environment, and focus on growth and development opportunities – including through training and education, upskilling into specialty positions, pathway programs and leadership development.

    The Minns Labor Government has introduced a broad suite of initiatives to further strengthen the state’s regional health workforce, including:

    • Implementing the Safe Staffing Levels initiative in our emergency departments
    • Providing permanent funding for 1,112 FTE nurses and midwives on an ongoing basis
    • Abolishing the wages cap and delivering the highest pay increase in over a decade for nurses and other health workers
    • Doubling the Rural Health Workforce Incentives Scheme – from $10,000 to $20,000 to fill to attract, train and retain health workers in some of the hardest to fill critically vacant positions in rural and regional NSW.
    • Beginning to roll out 500 additional paramedics in regional, rural and remote communities.
    • An investment of an additional $200.1 million to deliver more health worker accommodation in regional, rural and remote communities.

    Quotes attributable to Minister for Regional Health, Ryan Park

    “I’d like to warmly welcome Maitland’s newest team members and thank them for choosing a fulfilling career with NSW Health.

    “Attracting and retaining healthcare workers in regional settings is a longstanding challenge faced by every state and territory in Australia. and the Minns Labor Government is committed to building a more supported regional health workforce.

    “Hunter New England Local Health District’s success in growing its staff is a positive indication that we’re addressing this issue directly and that our workforce initiatives are making a difference.”

    Quotes attributable to Member for Maitland, Jenny Aitchison

    “Maitland’s reputation as a great place to live, work, and raise a family is clear.

    “The significant increase in staffing at Maitland Hospital reflects the confidence that healthcare professionals have in Maitland’s future and the exceptional quality of life our region provides.

    “We know there have been significant improvements needed at Maitland Hospital for years, it’s great that the Minister and the entire Minns Labor government are listening and acting to improve this fantastic facility for patients, nurses, doctors, ancillary staff and the broader community.”

    Quotes attributable to Acting General Manager Maitland Hospital, Jenny Martin

    “The Maitland region is a fantastic place to live and work, and we look forward to welcoming more colleagues and their families into our vibrant community.

    “The growth in staff numbers, including a nine per cent increase in nurses and midwives, 17 per cent in doctors, and five per cent in allied health professionals, reflects our commitment to both excellent patient care and supporting our colleagues in their professional careers.”

    Quotes attributable to Maitland Hospital Senior Resident Medical Officer Oncology, Sharmila K C

    “I moved to Maitland from Bendigo, Victoria, in February and was drawn to Hunter New England Local Health District’s strong reputation for mentorship, training, and commitment to education.

    “Maitland Hospital offers an incredibly supportive environment for both patients and staff, with a close-knit collaborative team culture that focuses on empathy and communication.

    “It’s an exciting time to be part of this community and contribute to the growth of health services in the Maitland region.”

    MIL OSI News –

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Australian Government welcomes new ALGA President

    Source: Australian Ministers 1

    The Australian Government welcomes Cr Matt Burnett as the newly-elected president of the Australian Local Government Association (ALGA).

    Cr Burnett brings extensive experience in the local government sector, having served for 24 years, including as ALGA’s Vice President since 2020, as the Mayor of Queensland’s Gladstone Regional Council since 2016 and before that as Deputy Mayor for five years. 

    He also represents Central Queensland on the Local Government Association of Queensland Policy Executive and is a Director on the Board.

    As National President of ALGA, Cr Burnett will represent the Australian local government sector on the national stage, such as the Australian Council of Local Governments (ACLG), the Local Government Ministers’ Forum, as well as meetings of the National Cabinet and other Australian Government forums.

    The Government also recognises the leadership of outgoing President Linda Scott and thanks her for her service to local government, which began in 2012. 

    This includes eight years at ALGA, four being in the role of National President advocating for and representing the sector, as well as service as former President of Local Government NSW and Deputy Lord Mayor and councillor for the City of Sydney.

    The Government will continue to partner with local government to ensure our towns, cities and regions remain great places to live, work and do business.

    Quotes attributable to Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development and Local Government Minister, Catherine King:

    “I congratulate Cr Burnett for his election to the National President role and look forward to continuing our Government’s strong productive working relationship with ALGA and the local government sector more broadly.

    “I also want to thank outgoing President Linda Scott for her tireless advocacy for local government and I wish her all the best for the future.

    “Local governments are a trusted partner of the Australian Government, and we will continue to work with them to drive a brighter future for Australians, no matter where they live.”

    Quotes attributable to Regional Development and Local Government Minister, Kristy McBain:

    “This is a fantastic appointment by ALGA, because Matt Burnett is someone that has long championed the local government sector, and someone who is passionate about our shared priorities for the future.

    “Having recently spent time with Mayor Burnett at Gladstone, it’s clear to see how much he’s delivered for his local community, and I’m excited about what we’ll achieve together in his new national role.

    “I’d like to thank Linda Scott, who’s been central to rebuilding the partnership between local councils and the Commonwealth, which has underpinned our funding increases for the local government sector, and the successful delivery of two Australian Council of Local Government forums.”

    MIL OSI News –

  • MIL-Evening Report: Meta has launched the world’s ‘most advanced’ glasses. Will they replace smartphones?

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Martie-Louise Verreynne, Professor in Innovation and Associate Dean (Research), The University of Queensland

    Humans are increasingly engaging with wearable technology as it becomes more adaptable and interactive. One of the most intimate ways gaining acceptance is through augmented reality (AR) glasses.

    Last week, Meta debuted a prototype of the most recent version of their AR glasses – Orion. They look like reading glasses and use holographic projection to allow users to see graphics projected through transparent lenses into their field of view.

    Meta chief Mark Zuckerberg called Orion “the most advanced glasses the world has ever seen”. He said they offer a “glimpse of the future” in which smart glasses will replace smartphones as the main mode of communication.

    But is this true or just corporate hype? And will AR glasses actually benefit us in new ways?

    Old technology, made new

    The technology used to develop Orion glasses is not new.

    In the 1960s, computer scientist Ivan Sutherland introduced the first augmented reality head-mounted display. Two decades later, Canadian engineer and inventor Stephen Mann developed the first glasses-like prototype.

    Throughout the 1990s, researchers and technology companies developed the capability of this technology through head-worn displays and wearable computing devices. Like many technological developments, these were often initially focused on military and industry applications.

    In 2013, after smartphone technology emerged, Google entered the AR glasses market. But consumers were disinterested, citing concerns about privacy, high cost, limited functionality and a lack of a clear purpose.

    This did not discourage other companies – such as Microsoft, Apple and Meta – from developing similar technologies.

    Looking inside

    Meta cites a range of reasons for why Orion are the world’s most advanced glasses, such as their miniaturised technology with large fields of view and holographic displays. It said these displays provide:

    compelling AR experiences, creating new human-computer interaction paradigms […] one of the most difficult challenges our industry has ever faced.

    Orion also has an inbuilt smart assistant (Meta AI) to help with tasks through voice commands, eye and hand tracking, and a wristband for swiping, clicking and scrolling.

    With these features, it is not difficult to agree that AR glasses are becoming more user-friendly for mass consumption. But gaining widespread consumer acceptance will be challenging.

    A set of challenges

    Meta will have to address four types of challenges:

    1. ease of wearing, using and integrating AR glasses with other glasses
    2. physiological aspects such as the heat the glasses generate, comfort and potential vertigo
    3. operational factors such as battery life, data security and display quality
    4. psychological factors such as social acceptance, trust in privacy and accessibility.

    These factors are not unlike what we saw in the 2000s when smartphones gained acceptance. Just like then, there are early adopters who will see more benefits than risks in adopting AR glasses, creating a niche market that will gradually expand.

    Similar to what Apple did with the iPhone, Meta will have to build a digital platform and ecosystem around Orion.

    This will allow for broader applications in education (for example, virtual classrooms), remote work and enhanced collaboration tools. Already, Orion’s holographic display allows users to overlay digital content and the real world, and because it is hands-free, communication will be more natural.

    Creative destruction

    Smart glasses are already being used in many industrial settings, such as logistics and healthcare. Meta plans to launch Orion for the general public in 2027.

    By that time, AI will have likely advanced to the point where virtual assistants will be able to see what we see and the physical, virtual and artificial will co-exist. At this point, it is easy to see that the need for bulky smartphones may diminish and that through creative destruction, one industry may replace another.

    This is supported by research indicating the virtual and augmented reality headset industry will be worth US$370 billion by 2034.

    The remaining question is whether this will actually benefit us.

    There is already much debate about the effect of smartphone technology on productivity and wellbeing. Some argue that it has benefited us, mainly through increased connectivity, access to information, and productivity applications.

    But others say it has just created more work, distractions and mental fatigue.

    If Meta has its way, AR glasses will solve this by enhancing productivity. Consulting firm Deloitte agrees, saying the technology will provide hands-free access to data, faster communication and collaboration through data-sharing.

    It also claims smart glasses will reduce human errors, enable data visualisation, and monitor the wearer’s health and wellbeing. This will ensure a quality experience, social acceptance, and seamless integration with physical processes.

    But whether or not that all comes true will depend on how well companies such as Meta address the many challenges associated with AR glasses.

    Martie-Louise Verreynne receives funding from the ARC and NHMRC.

    – ref. Meta has launched the world’s ‘most advanced’ glasses. Will they replace smartphones? – https://theconversation.com/meta-has-launched-the-worlds-most-advanced-glasses-will-they-replace-smartphones-240023

    MIL OSI Analysis – EveningReport.nz –

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Listening out for views on radio prominence

    Source: Australian Ministers for Regional Development

    The Albanese Government is continuing with its program of reform to modernise media regulations, with the release of a proposals paper on a new prominence framework for radio today.
     
    This consultation is seeking views from stakeholders on the need for, and form of, a prominence framework for radio services on internet connected, voice-enabled smart speakers.
     
    The way people listen to audio content is changing, with close to a third of Australian households now owning smart speakers that act as ‘gateway devices’, actively mediating the way content is delivered to listeners.
     
    A radio prominence framework would seek to address issues impacting access to local radio services via smart speakers: internet-enabled devices that can provide access to radio content through voice activation software (or voice assistants).
     
    As technology changes, it is essential that the barriers that may make it difficult for radio broadcasters and audiences to consume connect are addressed.
     
    Radio services that are made available in response to a voice command can be heavily dependent on the platform – in contrast to a traditional radio device, or even a website or an app.
     
    Local radio services are only one of a range of audio services available on these devices and platforms, and the Albanese Government is now seeking to ensure that local radio services are not disadvantaged compared to other services.
     
    This consultation is part of a broader program of media reform to enhance the ability of the Australian media to keep Australians informed, reflect our stories, uphold community standards and ensure access to services.
     
    Written comments and submission can be received by 5:00 pm AEDT on Monday 11 November 2024 at: https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/have-your-say/prominence-framework-radio-smart-speakers
     
    Quotes attributable to Minister for Communications, the Hon Michelle Rowland MP:
     
    “For over a century, radio has played an integral role in all of our lives as not only a source of entertainment for many Australians, but a resource for news, local content and critical emergency information.
     
    “Following on from our television prominence reforms, the Government is seeking to progress an aligned approach for radio services to help ensure that free local broadcast services remain easily accessible to all audiences. 
     
    “Interested stakeholders are encouraged to have their say to support the Government to design a radio prominence framework that best addresses the needs of both audiences and providers.” 

    MIL OSI News –

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Supporting age-friendly communities and improving health access for rainbow people key areas of EIT lecturer’s research | EIT Hawke’s Bay and Tairāwhiti

    Source: Eastern Institute of Technology – Tairāwhiti

    2 hours ago

    Jeffery Adams is a Postgraduate Health Science Lecturer at EIT Auckland.

    Supporting age-friendly communities and improving health access for rainbow people are key parts of an EIT Auckland lecturer’s research.

    Jeffery Adams, Postgraduate Health Science Lecturer at EIT Auckland, says that he has undertaken research and programme evaluation across a number of health areas and settings – including physical activity, alcohol, gambling, mental health and wellbeing, workforce issues, volunteering, and community development/community action.

    A recent research project has been an evaluation of the Office for Seniors age-friendly fund. Jeffery is working with Stephen Neville from Te Pūkenga, who is the lead researcher.

    “We are looking at this funding scheme that the Office for Seniors offers and trying to work out how effective it has been in helping councils and communities either develop an age friendly plan or to implement age friendly projects.”

    “It’s a New Zealand-wide sample with more than sixty different projects that have been funded. We are trying to make a determination about the fund as a whole as to whether it’s achieving outcomes and contributing to communities to be more age friendly.”

    Another project that Stephen and Jeffery are involved in is the validation of an age-friendly survey tool. This is a partnership between the researchers, the Office for Seniors, and the Napier City Council and in association with The Hague University of Applied Sciences. The tool has been successfully trialled by Napier City Council with the aim of rolling it out for use in other communities in New Zealand.

    There are eight domains for determining an age-friendly city – community and health care, transportation, housing, social participation, outdoor spaces and buildings, respect and social inclusion, civic participation and employment, and communication and information. For the Napier study,  validation process involved receiving feedback from a consumer panel in Napier.

    Jeffery says that while New Zealand has areas of age-friendliness, there’s a growing interest among some councils and communities to create more age-friendly environments.

    He says that one difficulty for cities is striking a balance between meeting the needs of everybody, while also ensuring older people’s specific needs are met.

    “An example is that many places have short time limits on their parking, but this can make it more difficult for older people to go out and shop and attend appointments.”

    Another focus area for Jeffery is the health and wellbeing of rainbow people (an umbrella term used to describe people of diverse sexualities, genders, and variations of sex characteristics). This research has included studies focused on mental health, alcohol consumption, HIV and sexual health promotion, and Asian gay men. It has been funded by a number of agencies including the NZ AIDS Foundation, Ministry of Health and the Health Promotion Agency and is characterised by engagement with community organisations and employment of community members as research team members.   

    Jeffery’s most recent project is examining data from the New Zealand Health Survey to ascertain the healthcare experiences and health behaviours of lesbian, gay and bisexual people. This work was funded by Massey University and is set to be published soon in New Zealand and Australian publications.

    Last year Jeffery and Stephen Neville wrote an article entitled Rainbow health in Aotearoa New Zealand – finally getting the attention it deserves?  which was published in the Journal of Primary Health Care.

    The authors wrote that the health of rainbow people had until now largely been ignored in government health policy.

    “However this has changed with the release by Te Whatu Ora and Te Aka Whai Ora of Te Pae Tata: Interim New Zealand Health Plan, which details priority areas to improve health outcomes and equity for all New Zealanders.”

    “Te Pae Tata promises a ‘new health system’ and improved health outcomes for rainbow people. Although this plan provides welcome recognition of inequity, it offers a limited, generalised view on how to improve health for rainbow people. More specific and detailed action plans on how equity might be achieved are required.”

    MIL OSI New Zealand News –

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Wednesday, 02 October 2024

    Source: Victoria Country Fire Authority

    Fire Danger Ratings tell you how dangerous a fire could be if one started.

    They are important because they help you decide what actions to take to protect yourself and others from bushfires and grassfires.

    A new Fire Danger Rating system was introduced in 2022 across Australia so whether you’re at home or travelling, you will see the same rating system. 

    The new Fire Danger Ratings

    There are four levels of fire danger in the new system:

    • Moderate – Plan and prepare
    • High – Be ready to act
    • Extreme – Take action now to protect your life and property
    • Catastrophic – For your survival, leave bushfire risk areas

    Fire Danger Ratings will be issued on days when there is a fire risk.

    Each fire danger rating will have a clear set of messages including the actions the community can take to reduce their risk.

    Ratings are forecast using Bureau of Meteorology data for up to four days in advance, based on weather and other environmental conditions such as vegetation.

    The rating is your trigger to take action to stay safe.

    What do the ratings mean and what should you do?

    CATASTROPHIC

    What does it mean?

    If a fire starts and takes hold, lives are likely to be lost.

    • These are the most dangerous conditions for a fire.

    What should I do?

    For your survival, leave bushfire risk areas.

    • Your life may depend on the decisions you make, even before there is a fire.
    • For your survival, do not be in bushfire risk areas.
    • Stay safe by going to a safer location early in the morning or the night before.
    • Homes cannot withstand fires in these conditions. You may not be able to leave and help may not be available.

    EXTREME

    What does it mean?

    Fires will spread quickly and be extremely dangerous.

    • These are dangerous fire conditions.
    • Expect hot, dry and windy conditions.

    What should I do?

    Take action now to protect your life and property

    • Check your bushfire plan and that your property is fire ready
    • If a fire starts, take immediate action. If you and your property are not prepared to the highest level, go to a safer location well before the fire impacts.
    • Reconsider travel through bushfire risk areas.
    • Leaving bushfire risk areas early in the day is your safest option.

    HIGH

    What does it mean?

    Fires can be dangerous.

    What should I do?

    Be ready to act.

    • There’s a heightened risk. Be alert for fires in your area.
    • Decide what you will do if a fire starts.
    • If a fire starts, your life and property may be at risk. The safest option is to avoid bushfire risk areas.

    MODERATE

    What does it mean?

    Most fires can be controlled.

    What should I do?

    Plan and prepare.

    • Stay up to date and be ready to act if there is a fire.

    NO RATING

    The system also introduces an ‘off’ level for days where no proactive action is required by the community. This does not mean that fires cannot happen, but that they are not likely to move or act in a way that threatens the safety of the community. This rating is the thin white wedge on the colour wheel sitting under ‘Moderate’.

    Find out more

    To see the current Fire Danger Rating forecast across the state see Total Fire Bans & Fire Danger Ratings. To see the Fire Danger Rating forecast for where you are, see CFA Local.

    For more detailed information, check out the Australasian Fire and Emergency Service Authorities (AFAC) website and FAQs, or Prepare and Get Ready – VicEmergency

     

    Page last updated:  Wednesday, 6 March 2024 9:16:53 AM

    MIL OSI News –

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Tuesday, 01 October 2024

    Source: Victoria Country Fire Authority

    Fire Danger Ratings tell you how dangerous a fire could be if one started.

    They are important because they help you decide what actions to take to protect yourself and others from bushfires and grassfires.

    A new Fire Danger Rating system was introduced in 2022 across Australia so whether you’re at home or travelling, you will see the same rating system. 

    The new Fire Danger Ratings

    There are four levels of fire danger in the new system:

    • Moderate – Plan and prepare
    • High – Be ready to act
    • Extreme – Take action now to protect your life and property
    • Catastrophic – For your survival, leave bushfire risk areas

    Fire Danger Ratings will be issued on days when there is a fire risk.

    Each fire danger rating will have a clear set of messages including the actions the community can take to reduce their risk.

    Ratings are forecast using Bureau of Meteorology data for up to four days in advance, based on weather and other environmental conditions such as vegetation.

    The rating is your trigger to take action to stay safe.

    What do the ratings mean and what should you do?

    CATASTROPHIC

    What does it mean?

    If a fire starts and takes hold, lives are likely to be lost.

    • These are the most dangerous conditions for a fire.

    What should I do?

    For your survival, leave bushfire risk areas.

    • Your life may depend on the decisions you make, even before there is a fire.
    • For your survival, do not be in bushfire risk areas.
    • Stay safe by going to a safer location early in the morning or the night before.
    • Homes cannot withstand fires in these conditions. You may not be able to leave and help may not be available.

    EXTREME

    What does it mean?

    Fires will spread quickly and be extremely dangerous.

    • These are dangerous fire conditions.
    • Expect hot, dry and windy conditions.

    What should I do?

    Take action now to protect your life and property

    • Check your bushfire plan and that your property is fire ready
    • If a fire starts, take immediate action. If you and your property are not prepared to the highest level, go to a safer location well before the fire impacts.
    • Reconsider travel through bushfire risk areas.
    • Leaving bushfire risk areas early in the day is your safest option.

    HIGH

    What does it mean?

    Fires can be dangerous.

    What should I do?

    Be ready to act.

    • There’s a heightened risk. Be alert for fires in your area.
    • Decide what you will do if a fire starts.
    • If a fire starts, your life and property may be at risk. The safest option is to avoid bushfire risk areas.

    MODERATE

    What does it mean?

    Most fires can be controlled.

    What should I do?

    Plan and prepare.

    • Stay up to date and be ready to act if there is a fire.

    NO RATING

    The system also introduces an ‘off’ level for days where no proactive action is required by the community. This does not mean that fires cannot happen, but that they are not likely to move or act in a way that threatens the safety of the community. This rating is the thin white wedge on the colour wheel sitting under ‘Moderate’.

    Find out more

    To see the current Fire Danger Rating forecast across the state see Total Fire Bans & Fire Danger Ratings. To see the Fire Danger Rating forecast for where you are, see CFA Local.

    For more detailed information, check out the Australasian Fire and Emergency Service Authorities (AFAC) website and FAQs, or Prepare and Get Ready – VicEmergency

     

    Page last updated:  Wednesday, 6 March 2024 9:16:53 AM

    MIL OSI News –

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Monday, 30 September 2024

    Source: Victoria Country Fire Authority

    Fire Danger Ratings tell you how dangerous a fire could be if one started.

    They are important because they help you decide what actions to take to protect yourself and others from bushfires and grassfires.

    A new Fire Danger Rating system was introduced in 2022 across Australia so whether you’re at home or travelling, you will see the same rating system. 

    The new Fire Danger Ratings

    There are four levels of fire danger in the new system:

    • Moderate – Plan and prepare
    • High – Be ready to act
    • Extreme – Take action now to protect your life and property
    • Catastrophic – For your survival, leave bushfire risk areas

    Fire Danger Ratings will be issued on days when there is a fire risk.

    Each fire danger rating will have a clear set of messages including the actions the community can take to reduce their risk.

    Ratings are forecast using Bureau of Meteorology data for up to four days in advance, based on weather and other environmental conditions such as vegetation.

    The rating is your trigger to take action to stay safe.

    What do the ratings mean and what should you do?

    CATASTROPHIC

    What does it mean?

    If a fire starts and takes hold, lives are likely to be lost.

    • These are the most dangerous conditions for a fire.

    What should I do?

    For your survival, leave bushfire risk areas.

    • Your life may depend on the decisions you make, even before there is a fire.
    • For your survival, do not be in bushfire risk areas.
    • Stay safe by going to a safer location early in the morning or the night before.
    • Homes cannot withstand fires in these conditions. You may not be able to leave and help may not be available.

    EXTREME

    What does it mean?

    Fires will spread quickly and be extremely dangerous.

    • These are dangerous fire conditions.
    • Expect hot, dry and windy conditions.

    What should I do?

    Take action now to protect your life and property

    • Check your bushfire plan and that your property is fire ready
    • If a fire starts, take immediate action. If you and your property are not prepared to the highest level, go to a safer location well before the fire impacts.
    • Reconsider travel through bushfire risk areas.
    • Leaving bushfire risk areas early in the day is your safest option.

    HIGH

    What does it mean?

    Fires can be dangerous.

    What should I do?

    Be ready to act.

    • There’s a heightened risk. Be alert for fires in your area.
    • Decide what you will do if a fire starts.
    • If a fire starts, your life and property may be at risk. The safest option is to avoid bushfire risk areas.

    MODERATE

    What does it mean?

    Most fires can be controlled.

    What should I do?

    Plan and prepare.

    • Stay up to date and be ready to act if there is a fire.

    NO RATING

    The system also introduces an ‘off’ level for days where no proactive action is required by the community. This does not mean that fires cannot happen, but that they are not likely to move or act in a way that threatens the safety of the community. This rating is the thin white wedge on the colour wheel sitting under ‘Moderate’.

    Find out more

    To see the current Fire Danger Rating forecast across the state see Total Fire Bans & Fire Danger Ratings. To see the Fire Danger Rating forecast for where you are, see CFA Local.

    For more detailed information, check out the Australasian Fire and Emergency Service Authorities (AFAC) website and FAQs, or Prepare and Get Ready – VicEmergency

     

    Page last updated:  Wednesday, 6 March 2024 9:16:53 AM

    MIL OSI News –

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Thursday, 03 October 2024

    Source: Victoria Country Fire Authority

    Fire Danger Ratings tell you how dangerous a fire could be if one started.

    They are important because they help you decide what actions to take to protect yourself and others from bushfires and grassfires.

    A new Fire Danger Rating system was introduced in 2022 across Australia so whether you’re at home or travelling, you will see the same rating system. 

    The new Fire Danger Ratings

    There are four levels of fire danger in the new system:

    • Moderate – Plan and prepare
    • High – Be ready to act
    • Extreme – Take action now to protect your life and property
    • Catastrophic – For your survival, leave bushfire risk areas

    Fire Danger Ratings will be issued on days when there is a fire risk.

    Each fire danger rating will have a clear set of messages including the actions the community can take to reduce their risk.

    Ratings are forecast using Bureau of Meteorology data for up to four days in advance, based on weather and other environmental conditions such as vegetation.

    The rating is your trigger to take action to stay safe.

    What do the ratings mean and what should you do?

    CATASTROPHIC

    What does it mean?

    If a fire starts and takes hold, lives are likely to be lost.

    • These are the most dangerous conditions for a fire.

    What should I do?

    For your survival, leave bushfire risk areas.

    • Your life may depend on the decisions you make, even before there is a fire.
    • For your survival, do not be in bushfire risk areas.
    • Stay safe by going to a safer location early in the morning or the night before.
    • Homes cannot withstand fires in these conditions. You may not be able to leave and help may not be available.

    EXTREME

    What does it mean?

    Fires will spread quickly and be extremely dangerous.

    • These are dangerous fire conditions.
    • Expect hot, dry and windy conditions.

    What should I do?

    Take action now to protect your life and property

    • Check your bushfire plan and that your property is fire ready
    • If a fire starts, take immediate action. If you and your property are not prepared to the highest level, go to a safer location well before the fire impacts.
    • Reconsider travel through bushfire risk areas.
    • Leaving bushfire risk areas early in the day is your safest option.

    HIGH

    What does it mean?

    Fires can be dangerous.

    What should I do?

    Be ready to act.

    • There’s a heightened risk. Be alert for fires in your area.
    • Decide what you will do if a fire starts.
    • If a fire starts, your life and property may be at risk. The safest option is to avoid bushfire risk areas.

    MODERATE

    What does it mean?

    Most fires can be controlled.

    What should I do?

    Plan and prepare.

    • Stay up to date and be ready to act if there is a fire.

    NO RATING

    The system also introduces an ‘off’ level for days where no proactive action is required by the community. This does not mean that fires cannot happen, but that they are not likely to move or act in a way that threatens the safety of the community. This rating is the thin white wedge on the colour wheel sitting under ‘Moderate’.

    Find out more

    To see the current Fire Danger Rating forecast across the state see Total Fire Bans & Fire Danger Ratings. To see the Fire Danger Rating forecast for where you are, see CFA Local.

    For more detailed information, check out the Australasian Fire and Emergency Service Authorities (AFAC) website and FAQs, or Prepare and Get Ready – VicEmergency

     

    Page last updated:  Wednesday, 6 March 2024 9:16:53 AM

    MIL OSI News –

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Deputy Vice Chancellors appointed at Australia’s newest major university

    Source: University of South Australia

    30 September 2024

    (Left to right): Ms Paula Ward, Mr Tom Steer, Mr Paul Beard, Mr Bruce Lines, Professor Steve Larkin, Professor Joanne Cys, Professor Jessica Gallagher, Professor Peter Høj AC, Professor David Lloyd FTSE, Professor John Williams AM, and Professor Anton Middelberg FTSE.

    Adelaide University has today announced the appointment of its first Deputy Vice Chancellors (DVCs).

    The selection of these important roles marks a significant milestone in the creation of a globally recognised institution committed to educational excellence and societal impact.

    Adelaide University co-Vice Chancellors, Professor Peter Høj and Professor David Lloyd, said the selection of the DVCs will provide strong foundational leadership through this time of transition and transformation.

    The Adelaide University DVCs are:

    • Deputy Vice Chancellor Academic: Professor John Williams AM
    • Deputy Vice Chancellor Corporate: Mr Paul Beard
    • Deputy Vice Chancellor Indigenous: Professor Steve Larkin
    • Deputy Vice Chancellor International & External Engagement: Professor Jessica Gallagher
    • Deputy Vice Chancellor People & Culture: Ms Paula Ward
    • Deputy Vice Chancellor Research & Innovation: Professor Anton Middelberg FTSE
    • Deputy Vice Chancellor Student Experience & Success: Mr Tom Steer
    • Provost & Deputy Vice Chancellor: Professor Joanne Cys

    “We congratulate our newly appointed colleagues who we know will provide the vision, expertise and guidance in realising our collective ambitions for a new university for the future,” Professors Lloyd and Høj said.

    “This leadership group have a tremendous depth of talent and we very much look forward to continuing our important work in creating a world-class contemporary and comprehensive institution and member of Australia’s prestigious and research-intensive Group of Eight [Go8].”

    The extensive recruitment process was conducted independently by nation-leading firm, Boyden Australia.

    The appointed DVCs will commence their roles on 1 October 2024 and Adelaide University will commence its operations on 1 January 2026.  

    International student applications are now open and research degrees will be open for application in early 2025.

    Local student applications and acceptances for coursework programs will open in August 2025 ahead of the 2026 academic year.

    Ends

    Media contacts

    Crispin Savage M: +61 481 912 462 E: Crispin.Savage@adelaide.edu.au; Candy Gibson M: +61 434 605 142 E: Candy.Gibson@unisa.edu.au  

    Other articles you may be interested in

    MIL OSI News –

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Friday, 04 October 2024

    Source: Victoria Country Fire Authority

    Fire Danger Ratings tell you how dangerous a fire could be if one started.

    They are important because they help you decide what actions to take to protect yourself and others from bushfires and grassfires.

    A new Fire Danger Rating system was introduced in 2022 across Australia so whether you’re at home or travelling, you will see the same rating system. 

    The new Fire Danger Ratings

    There are four levels of fire danger in the new system:

    • Moderate – Plan and prepare
    • High – Be ready to act
    • Extreme – Take action now to protect your life and property
    • Catastrophic – For your survival, leave bushfire risk areas

    Fire Danger Ratings will be issued on days when there is a fire risk.

    Each fire danger rating will have a clear set of messages including the actions the community can take to reduce their risk.

    Ratings are forecast using Bureau of Meteorology data for up to four days in advance, based on weather and other environmental conditions such as vegetation.

    The rating is your trigger to take action to stay safe.

    What do the ratings mean and what should you do?

    CATASTROPHIC

    What does it mean?

    If a fire starts and takes hold, lives are likely to be lost.

    • These are the most dangerous conditions for a fire.

    What should I do?

    For your survival, leave bushfire risk areas.

    • Your life may depend on the decisions you make, even before there is a fire.
    • For your survival, do not be in bushfire risk areas.
    • Stay safe by going to a safer location early in the morning or the night before.
    • Homes cannot withstand fires in these conditions. You may not be able to leave and help may not be available.

    EXTREME

    What does it mean?

    Fires will spread quickly and be extremely dangerous.

    • These are dangerous fire conditions.
    • Expect hot, dry and windy conditions.

    What should I do?

    Take action now to protect your life and property

    • Check your bushfire plan and that your property is fire ready
    • If a fire starts, take immediate action. If you and your property are not prepared to the highest level, go to a safer location well before the fire impacts.
    • Reconsider travel through bushfire risk areas.
    • Leaving bushfire risk areas early in the day is your safest option.

    HIGH

    What does it mean?

    Fires can be dangerous.

    What should I do?

    Be ready to act.

    • There’s a heightened risk. Be alert for fires in your area.
    • Decide what you will do if a fire starts.
    • If a fire starts, your life and property may be at risk. The safest option is to avoid bushfire risk areas.

    MODERATE

    What does it mean?

    Most fires can be controlled.

    What should I do?

    Plan and prepare.

    • Stay up to date and be ready to act if there is a fire.

    NO RATING

    The system also introduces an ‘off’ level for days where no proactive action is required by the community. This does not mean that fires cannot happen, but that they are not likely to move or act in a way that threatens the safety of the community. This rating is the thin white wedge on the colour wheel sitting under ‘Moderate’.

    Find out more

    To see the current Fire Danger Rating forecast across the state see Total Fire Bans & Fire Danger Ratings. To see the Fire Danger Rating forecast for where you are, see CFA Local.

    For more detailed information, check out the Australasian Fire and Emergency Service Authorities (AFAC) website and FAQs, or Prepare and Get Ready – VicEmergency

     

    Page last updated:  Wednesday, 6 March 2024 9:16:53 AM

    MIL OSI News –

  • MIL-Evening Report: Can Australia prosecute foreigners for genocide overseas? Here’s how our atrocity laws work

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Alister McKeich, Lecturer and Researcher in Law, Criminology and Indigenous Studies, Victoria University, Victoria University

    Shutterstock

    The onslaught in the Middle East has brought to the world’s attention once again the “crime of crimes”, genocide.

    Both the the International Court of Justice and International Criminal Court (ICC) have brought allegations of genocide against Israel as a state and Israeli and Hamas leaders as individuals.

    The Australian government’s response to the Gaza crisis has included temporarily freezing of A$6 million of funding to the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine. Though funding has been flowing again since March, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has been referred to the ICC by a law firm for being “an accessory to genocide”.

    Against this backdrop, Australia’s own genocide legislation is under parliamentary scrutiny. A bill tabled by independent Senator Lidia Thorpe (for whom I work as a casual legal researcher) seeks to change the way Australia deals with genocide.

    So what do our current laws say and what’s the case for changing them?

    What do our laws say?

    Australia ratified the Genocide Convention in 1949.

    Yet it was not until 2002, once the ICC was established, that the Commonwealth Criminal Code was amended to create a new division of atrocity crimes.

    Through this legislation, Australia may prosecute any person accused of a Rome Statute crime (such as genocide) under Australian law.

    At the moment, written consent from the attorney-general is required before legal proceedings about genocide and other atrocity crimes can commence. This is called the “attorney-general’s fiat”.

    Further, the attorney-general’s decision is final. It “must not be challenged, appealed against, reviewed, quashed or called into question”.

    Thorpe’s bill seeks to overturn these two measures.

    The explanatory memorandum in the 2002 amendment did not say why the attorney-general’s consent was necessary.

    Consent from an attorney-general (or similar position) is not an international requirement.

    Australia is only one of a handful of other countries (including the United Kingdom, New Zealand and Canada) where the fiat also exists.

    Why is it a problem?

    The Australian government has justified the rule on the basis that prosecutions for atrocity crimes against individuals could affect Australia’s international relations and national security.

    However, submissions from legal experts and community groups to a senate inquiry looking at the issue point out flaws.

    They say this rule prevents access to justice for victims and survivors of atrocity crimes. It can also create the potential for government bias.

    Submissions also say the lack of explanation or appeal process ignores fundamental principles of jurisprudence.

    Has the rule been used?

    The attorney-general’s fiat has been used in a limited number of cases.

    In 2009, Palestinian rights groups Australians for Palestine issued a request for consent for the prosecution of former Israeli prime minister Ehud Olmert, who was visiting at the time.

    The Australian Centre for International Justice states in its submission how then-attorney-general Robert McClellend denied the request. He cited matters of international state sovereignty and the difficulties of pursuing such a case in an overseas jurisdiction.

    Then, in 2011, Arunchalam Jegastheeswaran, an Australian citizen of Tamil
    background, sought the attorney-general’s consent for the prosecution of then Sri Lankan President, Mahinda Rajapaksa, who was due to visit Australia.

    McClellend again denied the request, saying Rajapaska was protected under “head of state immunity”. This concept is controversial in international law, given it’s often heads of state who commit atrocity crimes.

    Head of state protection was also offered to former Myanmar (Burma) leader Aung San Suu Kyi, who was in government when the 2017 genocide against the Rohingya was committed.

    With Suu Kyi due to be in Australia for an ASEAN conference in 2018, the Australian Rohingya community sought a prosecution. It was denied by then attorney-general Christian Porter.

    And in 2019, retired Sri Lankan General Jagath Jayasuriya visited Australia. Despite concerted efforts to raise evidence to prosecute Jayasuriya of war crimes, delays with the Australian Federal Police meant the case never reached the point of attorney-general consent.

    First Nations plaintiffs such as Paul Coe and Robert Thorpe have also sought to bring cases of genocide before the domestic courts, with no success.

    What would changing the laws mean?

    As it’s unlikely an attorney-general would consent to prosecutions against its own government, submissions to the inquiry argue the rule creates a direct conflict of interest.

    For First Nations people seeking justice for crimes of “ongoing genocide” perpetuated by the Commonwealth, any government is hardly going to rule in their favour.

    Some Indigenous community groups argue the high rates of First Nations children in protection, deaths in custody, hyper-incarceration and cultural, land and environmental damage amount to genocide crimes.

    Submissions to the inquiry recommend instead of requiring the consent of the attorney-general, claims of genocide should be directed to the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions. This would ensure greater independence from government.

    The director has a mandate for this sort of work. It already investigates similar crimes such as people smuggling, human trafficking, slavery and child exploitation.

    Internationally, the implications of this bill, if passed, will be consequential. The Australian Centre for International Justice estimates up to 1,000 Australian citizens have returned to Israel to fight as part of the Israel Defense Forces. Israel has been accused of serious atrocity crimes in Gaza.

    Should any of those citizens return, there could be attempts to mount a case. The government would then have to consider Australia’s political and economic ties with Israel.

    Whether the bill is passed will depend on parliament. But the situation highlights a paradox: the state itself will be deciding whether to remove its own inbuilt protections against charges of genocide.

    Alister McKeich is a casual legal researcher with the office of Senator Lidia Thorpe.

    – ref. Can Australia prosecute foreigners for genocide overseas? Here’s how our atrocity laws work – https://theconversation.com/can-australia-prosecute-foreigners-for-genocide-overseas-heres-how-our-atrocity-laws-work-236394

    MIL OSI Analysis – EveningReport.nz –

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Changing of the guard at the NDIS Commission

    Source: Australian Ministers for Social Services

    Minister for the NDIS the Hon. Bill Shorten MP has thanked outgoing Acting NDIS Quality and Safeguards Commissioner Michael Phelan APM for his outstanding contribution to the NDIS Commission over the last six months, as new Commissioner Louise Glanville and Associate Commissioner Natalie Wade prepare to take the helm from tomorrow.

    Minister Shorten said Acting Commissioner Phelan’s strong focus on weeding out unscrupulous providers while strengthening the NDIS Commission’s processes and keeping a focus on safeguarding the rights of people with disability, had resulted in significant improvements.

    “Mike Phelan was absolutely the right person for the tough gig of leading the NDIS Commission into its next phase as a trusted and effective regulator of the NDIS,” Minister Shorten said.

    “While the initial Acting Commissioner role was only for three months, Mike agreed to stay on for an additional three months while we found the right replacement, because he understood the importance of the Commission’s role.

    “The improvements that have been made in that short time have been extraordinary and are due in large part to Mike’s extensive experience in the policing and financial crime worlds but are also a testament to the inherent empathy and humanity of the man himself.

    “Mike has been an exceptional leader who has guided the NDIS Commission to a new stage of maturity, to become a regulator with teeth.”

    To enable this evolution, the Australian Government last year invested in an effective doubling of the NDIS Commission workforce, and over the next four years the organisation will be strengthening its systems and capabilities through the $160 million Data and Regulatory Transformation (DART) Program.

    Minister Shorten said during Acting Commissioner Phelan’s tenure the NDIS Commission:

    • Initiated the design of a fit-for-purpose risk-based Prioritisation Model to ensure the NDIS Commission’s resources are directed to the matters of the highest priority
    • Implemented a state-of-the-art communication system in the Contact Centre, that has resulted in twice as many calls handled
    • Advocated for the proposed reforms to registration to be prioritised, which will commence with compulsory registration for platform providers, support coordinators and SIL providers
    • Strengthened compliance and enforcement processes and prioritised intelligence functions to maximise the return on the Australian Government’s investment in DART
    • Commissioned an external Human Resources review to bolster the NDIS Commission’s HR function as it matures
    • Appointed the firm led by former Australian Sex Discrimination Commissioner Elizabeth Broderick to lead a comprehensive review into the workplace culture of the NDIS Commission.

    “Mike has made an invaluable contribution in his short time at the NDIS Commission, and I wholeheartedly thank him for his commitment, his leadership and his dedication to realising the potential of the organisation,” Minister Shorten said.

    “From tomorrow, the NDIS Commission welcomes new Commissioner Louise Glanville, who is highly experienced in both the legal and disability sectors, and who will be tasked with picking up what Mike has started and delivering on this incredibly important program of work.

    “Natalie Wade, who is an experienced disability rights lawyer and advocate, will also be joining the NDIS Commission as Associate Commissioner, with responsibility for registration and reform.”

    MIL OSI News –

  • MIL-Evening Report: Online spaces are rife with toxicity. Well-designed AI tools can help clean them up

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Lucy Sparrow, Lecturer in Human-Computer Interaction, The University of Melbourne

    MMD Creative/Shutterstock

    Imagine scrolling through social media or playing an online game, only to be interrupted by insulting and harassing comments. What if an artificial intelligence (AI) tool stepped in to remove the abuse before you even saw it?

    This isn’t science fiction. Commercial AI tools like ToxMod and Bodyguard.ai are already used to monitor interactions in real time across social media and gaming platforms. They can detect and respond to toxic behaviour.

    The idea of an all-seeing AI monitoring our every move might sound Orwellian, but these tools could be key to making the internet a safer place.

    However, for AI moderation to succeed, it needs to prioritise values like privacy, transparency, explainability and fairness. So can we ensure AI can be trusted to make our online spaces better? Our two recent research projects into AI-driven moderation show this can be done – with more work ahead of us.

    Negativity thrives online

    Online toxicity is a growing problem. Nearly half of young Australians have experienced some form of negative online interaction, with almost one in five experiencing cyberbullying.

    Whether it’s a single offensive comment or a sustained slew of harassment, such harmful interactions are part of daily life for many internet users.

    The severity of online toxicity is one reason the Australian government has proposed banning social media for children under 14.

    But this approach fails to fully address a core underlying problem: the design of online platforms and moderation tools. We need to rethink how online platforms are designed to minimise harmful interactions for all users, not just children.

    Unfortunately, many tech giants with power over our online activities have been slow to take on more responsibility, leaving significant gaps in moderation and safety measures.

    This is where proactive AI moderation offers the chance to create safer, more respectful online spaces. But can AI truly deliver on this promise? Here’s what we found.

    ‘Havoc’ in online multiplayer games

    In our Games and Artificial Intelligence Moderation (GAIM) Project, we set out to understand the ethical opportunities and pitfalls of AI-driven moderation in online multiplayer games. We conducted 26 in-depth interviews with players and industry professionals to find out how they use and think about AI in these spaces.

    Interviewees saw AI as a necessary tool to make games safer and combat the “havoc” caused by toxicity. With millions of players, human moderators can’t catch everything. But an untiring and proactive AI can pick up what humans miss, helping reduce the stress and burnout associated with moderating toxic messages.

    But many players also expressed confusion about the use of AI moderation. They didn’t understand why they received account suspensions, bans and other punishments, and were often left frustrated that their own reports of toxic behaviour seemed to be lost to the void, unanswered.

    Participants were especially worried about privacy in situations where AI is used to moderate voice chat in games. One player exclaimed: “my god, is that even legal?” It is – and it’s already happening in popular online games such as Call of Duty.

    Our study revealed there’s tremendous positive potential for AI moderation. However, games and social media companies will need to do a lot more work to make these systems transparent, empowering and trustworthy.

    Right now, AI moderation is seen to operate much like a police officer in an opaque justice system. What if AI instead took the form of a teacher, guardian, or upstander – educating, empowering or supporting users?

    Enter AI Ally

    This is where our second project AI Ally comes in, an initiative funded by the eSafety Commissioner. In response to high rates of tech-based gendered violence in Australia, we are co-designing an AI tool to support girls, women and gender-diverse individuals in navigating safer online spaces.

    We surveyed 230 people from these groups, and found that 44% of our respondents “often” or “always” experienced gendered harassment on at least one social media platform. It happened most frequently in response to everyday online activities like posting photos of themselves, particularly in the form of sexist comments.

    Interestingly, our respondents reported that documenting instances of online abuse was especially useful when they wanted to support other targets of harassment, such as by gathering screenshots of abusive comments. But only a few of those surveyed did this in practice. Understandably, many also feared for their own safety should they intervene by defending someone or even speaking up in a public comment thread.

    These are worrying findings. In response, we are designing our AI tool as an optional dashboard that detects and documents toxic comments. To help guide us in the design process, we have created a set of “personas” that capture some of our target users, inspired by our survey respondents.

    Some of the user ‘personas’ guiding the development of the AI Ally tool.
    Ren Galwey/Research Rendered

    We allow users to make their own decisions about whether to filter, flag, block or report harassment in efficient ways that align with their own preferences and personal safety.

    In this way, we hope to use AI to offer young people easy-to-access support in managing online safety while offering autonomy and a sense of empowerment.

    We can all play a role

    AI Ally shows we can use AI to help make online spaces safer without having to sacrifice values like transparency and user control. But there is much more to be done.

    Other, similar initiatives include Harassment Manager, which was designed to identify and document abuse on Twitter (now X), and HeartMob, a community where targets of online harassment can seek support.

    Until ethical AI practices are more widely adopted, users must stay informed. Before joining a platform, check if they are transparent about their policies and offer user control over moderation settings.

    The internet connects us to resources, work, play and community. Everyone has the right to access these benefits without harassment and abuse. It’s up to all of us to be proactive and advocate for smarter, more ethical technology that protects our values and our digital spaces.

    The AI Ally team consists of Dr Mahli-Ann Butt, Dr Lucy Sparrow, Dr Eduardo Oliveira, Ren Galwey, Dahlia Jovic, Sable Wang-Wills, Yige Song and Maddy Weeks.

    Dr Lucy Sparrow receives funding from the eSafety Commissioner’s Preventing Tech-Based Abuse Against Women grant program for the “AI Ally” project.

    Dr Eduardo Oliveira receives funding from the eSafety Commissioner’s Preventing Tech-Based Abuse Against Women grant program for the “AI Ally” project.

    Dr Mahli-Ann Butt receives funding from the eSafety Commissioner’s Preventing Tech-Based Abuse Against Women grant program for the “AI Ally” project.

    – ref. Online spaces are rife with toxicity. Well-designed AI tools can help clean them up – https://theconversation.com/online-spaces-are-rife-with-toxicity-well-designed-ai-tools-can-help-clean-them-up-239590

    MIL OSI Analysis – EveningReport.nz –

  • MIL-OSI Australia: City strategy outlines vision for future land use planning and development

    Source: Government of Western Australia

    Community consultation for the City of Wanneroo’s Draft Local Planning Strategy opens this week and residents and local business owners are encouraged to share their views.

    The Strategy is intended to guide future land use planning and development in the City and focusses on facilitating urban growth while providing housing diversity, supporting economic growth, delivering quality public spaces and protecting our environmental and community assets.

    All community members are invited to complete our online survey or attend our drop-in sessions to provide feedback and help shape the future of the City.

    Mayor Linda Aitken said the document was the City’s first Local Planning Strategy and encouraged residents to have their say.

    “As one of the State’s fastest growing local government areas, the City continues to play an important role in accommodating population growth, supporting economic opportunities, delivering connected infrastructure, all while balancing our impact on the environment,” she said.

    “Our community wants diverse housing choices, a range of transport services and infrastructure to support walking, cycling, public transport and car use.

    “The Strategy aims to protect our unique local character and sense of place while we plan for future growth and development.”

    Once finalised, the Strategy will inform a new Planning Scheme, as well as land use plans and policies.

    Have your say at here or access a hard copy at the Civic Centre.

    Community drop-in sessions

    • Thursday 10 October, 5pm to 7pm, Pearsall Hocking Community Centre, Pearsall
    • Tuesday 15 October, 5pm to 7pm, Phil Renkin Function Room, Two Rocks
    • Thursday 17 October, 5pm to 7pm, Community Centre Activity room, Koondoola

    MIL OSI News –

  • MIL-Evening Report: Kamala Harris the slight favourite to win US election as she narrowly leads in key states

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Adrian Beaumont, Election Analyst (Psephologist) at The Conversation; and Honorary Associate, School of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Melbourne

    The US presidential election will be held on November 5. In analyst Nate Silver’s aggregate of national polls, Democrat Kamala Harris leads Republican Donald Trump by 49.3–46.0 – a slight widening of the competition since last Monday, when Harris led Trump by 49.2–46.2.

    President Joe Biden’s final position before his withdrawal as Democratic candidate on July 21 was a national poll deficit against Trump of 45.2–41.2.

    There will be a debate on Tuesday evening US time between the vice-presidential candidates, Democrat Tim Walz and Republican JD Vance. Vice-presidential debates in previous elections have not had a significant influence on the contest.

    The US president isn’t elected by the national popular vote, but by the Electoral College, in which each state receives electoral votes equal to its federal House seats (population based) and senators (always two). Almost all states award their electoral votes as winner-takes-all, and it takes 270 electoral votes to win (out of 538 total).

    The Electoral College is biased to Trump relative to the national popular vote, with Harris needing at least a two-point popular vote win in Silver’s model to be the Electoral College favourite.

    In Silver’s polling averages, Harris leads Trump by one to two points in Pennsylvania (19 electoral votes), Michigan (15), Wisconsin (ten) and Nevada (six). If Harris wins all these states, she is likely to win the Electoral College by at least a 276–262 margin. Trump is ahead by less than a point in North Carolina (16 electoral votes) and Georgia (16), and if Harris wins both, she wins by 308–230.

    In Silver’s model, Harris has a 56% chance to win the Electoral College, up from 54% last Monday but down from her peak of 58% two days ago. Earlier this month, there were large differences in win probability between Silver’s model and the FiveThirtyEight model, which was more favourable to Harris. But these models have nearly converged, with FiveThirtyEight now giving Harris a 59% win probability.

    There are still more than five weeks until election day, so polls could change in either Trump’s or Harris’ favour by then. Harris’ one to two point leads in the key states are tenuous, and this explains why Trump is still rated a good chance to win.

    Silver wrote on September 1 that polls in 2020 and 2016 were biased against Trump, but polls in 2012 were biased against Barack Obama. In the last two midterm elections (2022 and 2018), polls have been good. It’s plausible there will be a polling error this year, but which candidate such an error would favour can’t be predicted.

    On Sunday, Silver said if there was a systematic error of three or four points in the polls in either Trump’s or Harris’ favour, that candidate would sweep all the swing states and easily win the Electoral College. There are other scenarios in which one candidate underperforms the polls with some demographics but overperforms with other demographics.

    I wrote about the US election for The Poll Bludger last Thursday, and also covered bleak polls and byelection results in Canada for the governing centre-left Liberals ahead of an election due by October 2025, a dreadful poll for UK Labour Prime Minister Keir Starmer, the new French prime minister, a German state election and a socialist win in Sri Lanka’s presidential election.

    Upwardly revised economic data

    Last Thursday, a revised estimate of June quarter US GDP was released. There was a large upward revision in real disposable personal income compared to the previously reported figures. This has resulted in the personal savings rate being revised up to 4.9% in July from the previously reported 2.9%, and it was 4.8% in August.

    With these upward revisions, Silver’s economic index that averages six indicators is now at +0.25, up from +0.09. As the incumbent party’s candidate, a better economy than was previously believed should help Harris.

    Coalition gains narrow lead in Essential

    In Australia, a national Essential poll, conducted on September 18–22 from a sample of 1,117 people, gave the Coalition a 48–47 lead (including undecided voters) after a 48–48 tie in early September. It’s the Coalition’s first lead in the Essential poll since mid-July.

    Primary votes were 35% Coalition (steady), 29% Labor (down one), 12% Greens (down one), 8% One Nation (steady), 2% UAP (up one), 9% for all Others (up one) and 5% undecided (steady).

    Anthony Albanese’s net approval was up five points since August to –5, with 47% disapproving and 42% approving. Peter Dutton’s net approval was down one to net zero.

    On social media regulations, 48% thought them too weak, 43% about right and 8% too tough. By 67–17, voters supported imposing an age limit for children to access social media (68–15 in July). By 71–12, voters supported making doxing (the public release of personally identifiable data) a criminal offence (62–19 in February).

    By 49–18, voters supported Labor’s Help to Buy scheme, and by 57–13 they supported the build-to-rent scheme. The questions give detail that few voters would know.

    Voters were told the Liberals and Greens had combined to delay Labor’s housing policies in the senate. By 48–22, voters thought the Liberals and Greens should pass the policies and argue for their own policies at the next election, rather than block Labor’s policies. Greens voters supported passing by 55–21.

    Labor keeps narrow lead in Morgan

    A national Morgan poll, conducted September 16–22 from a sample of 1,662 people, gave Labor a 50.5–49.5 lead, unchanged from the September 9–15 Morgan poll.

    Primary votes were 37.5% Coalition (steady), 32% Labor (up 1.5), 12.5% Greens (steady), 5% One Nation (down 0.5), 9.5% independents (down 0.5) and 3.5% others (down 0.5).

    The headline figure is based on respondent preferences. By 2022 election preference flows, Labor led by an unchanged 52–48.

    Adrian Beaumont does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    – ref. Kamala Harris the slight favourite to win US election as she narrowly leads in key states – https://theconversation.com/kamala-harris-the-slight-favourite-to-win-us-election-as-she-narrowly-leads-in-key-states-239735

    MIL OSI Analysis – EveningReport.nz –

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Better evidence for better policymaking

    Source: Australian Treasurer

    Today, I will travel to the United Kingdom to discuss rigorous policy evaluation with experts and policymakers.

    Rigorous policy evaluation is an important tool for creating opportunity and addressing inequality. The meetings will be a valuable chance to exchange ideas with a jurisdiction that has been a leader in the field of evidence‑based policymaking.

    On Wednesday, I will deliver a public lecture at the University of Oxford. On Thursday, I will speak at an event hosted by the UK Evaluation Task Force in London, and will also engage in an in‑conversation event hosted by the Behavioural Insights Team.

    These events will be a chance to make the case for randomised trials and international evidence sharing.

    I will also meet with leaders from the UK’s network of What Works Centres to discuss how we can further develop evidence‑based policy making in Australia.

    This dialogue and engagement will directly support the development of the Australian Centre for Evaluation in Treasury and help improve the quality of evaluation across the Australian Government.

    More broadly, the trip is a chance to discuss common difficulties and opportunities in my portfolio areas, including in competition, multinational tax and statistics. Meetings with UK government counterparts will cover how our economies can address common challenges in these areas.

    MIL OSI News –

  • MIL-Evening Report: Unwritten rules, nostalgia and subtle rebellion: how school photos capture childhood and the changing times

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Cherine Fahd, Associate Head of School, School of Design, University of Technology Sydney

    A 1935 school photograph taken in Kandos, NSW. Author provided, courtesy of the Kandos Museum.

    In the town of Kandos, New South Wales, there’s the local Kandos Museum run by volunteers. The museum holds relics from the cement works that once defined the town, but there are other treasures, too.

    As part of the Cementa24 festival, I became fixated on the museum’s collection of school photos. Neatly organised into ring-bound folders by the volunteers, the group portraits span decades of students from Kandos Public School and Kandos High School, from 1924 through to the 1990s.

    A photo album made by volunteers at the Kandos Museum.
    Author provided

    I enlarged and cropped some of these photos to turn them into street posters to scatter around town. I asked permission before sticking a few outside the local pub, the radio station, the post office and the op shop. I spot the locals smiling as they pass them, stopping to look for someone they know. I watch them point at the pictures and hear them naming names.

    Working on this project, I can’t stop thinking about the weight of these photographic rituals. School photos aren’t just memories; they hold social histories. Through them, you can trace changes in hairstyles, fashion, attitudes and even migration – yet there’s something homogeneous and unchangeable about how they’re made.

    School photo rules

    There’s always a physical hierarchy in these photos. The photographer organises the group to ensure compositional acuity. The students are lined up in rows, with tall people in the back and shorter people in front – evenly spaced, arranged by height and symmetry.

    When was the rule made that says this is how a group should look? Balanced, orderly and with everyone fitting neatly into place, whether they socially do or not. Somehow I always ended up on the edge of the middle row. The social dynamics of the playground found their way into the organisation of our bodies, forever captured in a split second.

    A photo of Kandos’ 5th Form, 1967.
    Author provided, courtesy of the Kandos Museum

    Looking at the Kandos photos from the 1940s through to the 1970s, then at my children’s photos from 2013 to 2024, and my own school photos in the 1980s and ‘90s, I can see the difference in public, private and catholic school uniforms. I can see the difference in racial diversity (or lack thereof) between a small regional town, inner-city Sydney and suburban southwest Sydney. I can also see how much photographic technology has changed.

    Despite this, the organisational structure of the school photo remains the same. The kids still stand stiffly in their rows, with identical tunics and ties. Standing too close, someone’s elbow digs into someone else’s side.

    As a photographer now, I often think about these school photos and the rituals that have remained largely unchanged in Australia. Every year, kids are shuffled onto tiered steps. Those in the front put their knees together, hands in laps, while the girls must “try to look like ladies”. Then there are the “nobodies” in the middle row (or is that just me reading into it?)

    The perils of posing

    Posing for school photos can be complicated. One year my daughter came home from school and declared the photographer was sexist because he made all the girls sit in the front row while the boys got to stand. I asked her why sitting was sexist. She couldn’t explain – she was eight years old – but she certainly felt the power difference between sitting with your knees pressed together and standing tall.

    And what about the solo portrait? I still think about my kindergarten class from 1979. The group photo was fine. I was happy, standing next to my new best friend. But my solo portrait was a disaster. I looked possessed, my eyes half-closed, lashes blurred, caught mid-blink.

    My mother didn’t buy the solo photo, but she kept the group one. After that I promised myself it would never happen again. I told myself every year: “don’t blink, don’t blink”. Back then, photography was on film. There were no re-dos, no instant feedback, no photoshop and no AI. Once the camera clicked, that was it.

    ‘Don’t blink, don’t blink,’ I’d think, while trying to keep my eyes open.
    Author provided

    At the end of primary school, I’d visit my best friend’s house and envy the neat, chronological line of her school photos framed on her kitchen wall. Year by year, there she was, changing just slightly – a slow, steady record of growing up. I didn’t know why, but seeing framed evidence of time passing made me emotional. Maybe it was the certainty of the way her life was so neatly documented.

    My own school photos never made it to the wall in such a tidy fashion. But they did make it into my father’s wallet, my mother’s purse, in frames above the piano, on the fridge, in photo albums and in many a drawer.

    Small acts of rebellion

    The 1950s photos are formal and solemn. Back then you stood straight, faced the camera and no one smiled too much. By the 1970s and ’80s, the kids started to smirk – with hair loosened, mullets, and bodies shifting like they were trying to resist the pose. In one photo, the basketball team boys have their shoes off, feet raised above the blistering asphalt in the summer heat. The rules were still there, but you can see them pushing back.

    Bare feet raised in a photo of the Kandos High School Open basketball team, 1975.
    Author provided, courtesy of the Kandos Museum.

    What if we invited the rituals to change? What if students could self-organise, be silly, pull faces, wear their own clothes, and resist gender binaries and institutional uniformity?

    Some of the photos in the Kandos albums hint at this potential for small acts of rebellion. There’s the girl pulling a face, one laughing in profile. In one photo there’s a kid wearing a non-regulation jumper, and another in which they were clearly allowed to be silly because the teacher is laughing too.

    Photographic rebellion in the class of 1996.
    Author provided, courtesy of the Kandos Museum.

    In the pre-digital era, these small mishaps and moments of failure were captured unpolished and unfiltered. Those are the images I find myself drawn to; these are often the best ones. They reveal how uncomfortable it can be being photographed and how forced a pose can feel. Shirking a smile and a stiff stance is maybe the only power we have in that brief moment.

    Cherine Fahd does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    – ref. Unwritten rules, nostalgia and subtle rebellion: how school photos capture childhood and the changing times – https://theconversation.com/unwritten-rules-nostalgia-and-subtle-rebellion-how-school-photos-capture-childhood-and-the-changing-times-239190

    MIL OSI Analysis – EveningReport.nz –

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Allens advises Northern Minerals on $48m equity raising

    Source: Allens Insights

    Allens has advised Northern Minerals on a capital raising to progress its Browns Range heavy rare earth element (HREE) Project, including a $43 million two-tranche private placement and $5 million share purchase plan.

    The private placement, offered to existing and new institutional and sophisticated investors, attracted a significant level of demand.

    Located in Western Australia’s East Kimberley region, the Browns Range Project is one of the most high grade and advanced HREE projects outside China. The dysprosium and terbium resources it expects to supply are essential for high-performance permanent magnets used in electric vehicles and wind turbines.

    Allens advised on all elements of the capital raising from concept to execution, including capital raising structures, execution of the equity raising and regulatory considerations.

    ‘Strong demand continues among investors for rare earths exposure, as evidenced by the response to Northern Minerals’ private placement as well as sizeable raisings conducted by other developing players in the space throughout this year,’ said lead Partner Bryn Hardcastle.

    ‘We congratulate Northern Minerals on its successful capital raising and look forward to seeing what’s ahead for the Browns Range Project.’

    Allens legal team

    Bryn Hardcastle (Partner), Andrew Wong (Mergers and Acquisitions Counsel), Chris Bailey (Senior Associate), Alex Forster (Associate), Christopher Shields (Lawyer)

    MIL OSI News –

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Dredging work begins on Lumsden Point Project in Port Hedland

    Source: Australian Ministers for Infrastructure and Transport

    Work has started on dredging at Lumsden Point in the Port of Port Hedland, with approximately one million cubic metres of material to be removed over the next eight weeks.

    The dredging will create a deeper access channel, swing basin and berth pockets to ensure the safe and efficient berthing of vessels at the new Lumsden Point facility.

    Earlier this year, Jan De Nul (Australia) Pty Ltd was awarded the contract for these vital dredging and land reclamation activities.

    Extensive preparatory works have already been completed, culminating in the arrival of the JFJ De Nul cutter suction dredge in Port Hedland earlier this week. 

    Environmental monitoring is being carried out as part of the dredging program to minimise the risk of impact to surrounding habitats.

    Dredged material will be disposed of at a designated reclamation area within Lumsden in accordance with an approved Environmental Management Plan.

    Lumsden Point will facilitate the export of battery metals such as lithium and copper concentrates, the import of renewable energy infrastructure including wind turbines and blades, as well as support the growth of direct shipping services to the Pilbara.

    The Australian Government is investing $565 million in common user port upgrades in the Pilbara, $450 million of which will enable the development of new multi-user facilities and berths at Lumsden Point.

    This is in partnership with the Western Australian Government, which is contributing $96.6 million to the project.

    BHP, Fortescue, Roy Hill and the Hancock Prospecting Pty Ltd/Mineral Resources Ltd Joint Venture have committed a total of $65 million towards dredging costs.

    Further information about the Lumsden Point project is available at http://www.pilbaraports.com.au

    Quotes attributable to Minister for Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development and Local Government Catherine King:

    “The Australian Government is delivering $565 million in common user port upgrades in the Pilbara to help unlock trade and investment opportunities and support a future made in Australia.

    “This project is all about investment in quality infrastructure which encourages and supports opportunities for local businesses and communities.

    “We will continue to partner with the Western Australian Government to ensure that this vital infrastructure progresses .”

    Quotes attributable to Western Australian Minister for Ports David Michael:

    “It’s fantastic to see the progress being made at Lumsden Point.

    “The commencement of the dredging and reclamation works represents a significant milestone in the project’s advancement which will help diversify trade in the Pilbara.

    “Upon completion, Lumsden Point is expected to boost Australia’s gross domestic product by $2.1 billion per annum.

    “It is expected to save 3.6 million tonnes of emissions by 2055 by supporting direct shipping to the Pilbara and providing a pathway for renewable energy infrastructure.”

    Quotes attributable to Senator for Western Australia Glenn Sterle:

    “The Australian Government’s investment in the Lumsden Point expansion helps position Northern Australia to take advantage of the economic opportunities this project will provide as demand grows locally and overseas for clean energy sources.

    “This project, which I’m pleased to see is underway, will drive both employment and economic growth while delivering lasting infrastructure that will continue to benefit the region well into the future.”

    Quotes attributable to State Member for Pilbara Kevin Michel:

    “Lumsden Point is a key investment in the Pilbara’s future, enhancing our ability to support economic growth and strengthen the region’s global significance. 

    “The port expansion will solidify the Pilbara’s role as a driving force in the green energy transition, unlocking new trade pathways and creating hundreds of local jobs that will directly benefit our communities.”

    MIL OSI News –

  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: Director General David Cheng-Wei Wu attended Taiwan Tourism Promotion

    Source: Republic Of China Taiwan 2

    Taiwan Tourism Administration held a tourism promotion event in Sydney at Four Seasons Hotel on Sep 23 2024. It was a great turnout with nearly 70 Australian travel agencies joining to explore the great business opportunities.
    Director General David Cheng-Wei Wu spoke about Taiwan’s beauty in different ways. Taiwan and Australia are not only geographically close, but also sharing same core values, which makes Taiwan one of the safest and best places to Australian travelers. New initiative, Taiwan-Waves of wonder, allows you to experience its charms all year-around. Even Hollywood action movie “Weekend in Taipei” was 100% shot in Taiwan, which shows the city’s landscapes and diversities are also recognized by entertainment industry. The huge potential for the travel market is undeniable.
    The event was followed by PR representative’s briefing about Taiwan’s attractions, introduction of Meet Taiwan by Taiwan Trade Center and travel agents from Taiwan shared their ideas and packages. Then a few rounds of the match-making meetings were very successful.

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News –

  • MIL-Evening Report: Autistic people and those with ADHD are more likely to have eating disorders. Here’s why – and how this affects their treatment

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Breanna Lepre, Lecturer in Nutrition and Dietetics, The University of Queensland

    BearFotos/Shutterstock

    More than 1.1 million Australians are estimated to be living with an eating disorder. Around one-third of these people are neurodivergent.

    So why are neurodivergent people, such as autistic people and those with ADHD, more likely to experience eating disorders than the broader population? And how does this impact their treatment?

    First, what is neurodivergence?

    Neurodivergence, or the state of being neurodivergent, is a term for people whose cognitive functioning differs from what society considers “typical”. Many conditions broadly fall under neurodivergence, including (but not limited to):

    • autism
    • attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)
    • dyslexia
    • Tourette’s syndrome.

    Our understanding of neurodivergence has come a long way. Neurodivergence used to be considered a linear “spectrum” ranging from less to more neurodivergent.

    We now know every neurodivergent person will have a unique experience across a range of dimensions. This includes sensory processing, motor abilities and executive functioning (working memory, cognitive flexibility and inhibition).

    Conceptualising these differences ends up looking more like a colour wheel.

    What are eating disorders?

    Eating disorders are complex and potentially life-threatening mental health conditions. They cause persistent and significant disturbances in thoughts, feelings and behaviours related to body weight, food and/or eating.

    Many factors are likely to contribute to the development of an eating disorder. But research shows neurodivergent people are disproportionately affected.

    One review found around 22.9% of autistic people had an eating disorder, compared with 2% in the general population. In another review, people with ADHD were four times more likely to be diagnosed with an eating disorder than people without ADHD.

    Why are eating disorders more common among neurodivergent people?

    Science has not pinpointed an exact reason why eating disorders are more common among neurodivergent people. But here’s what we know so far.

    Neurodivergent people are more likely to experience feeding difficulties, sensory sensitivities and disordered eating.

    A United States study assessing the eating behaviour of neurodivergent children found around 70% of autistic children displayed “atypical” eating behaviours. This includes food selectivity and a hypersensitivity to food textures. It compares with 4.8% of neurotypical children.

    Similarly, autistic children may choose or reject foods based on texture more than other children. They may prefer foods with a consistent texture, bland taste and neutral colour (for example, chicken nuggets, plain pasta and rice).

    Selective eating (having limited accepted foods and food aversions) has been associated with avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID). This is an eating disorder characterised by avoidance and aversion to food and eating that is not related to body image. ARFID is commonly associated with autism, with one study estimating 21% of autistic people will experience it in their lifetime.

    Some neurodivergent people have food aversions.
    goodbishop/Shutterstock

    Other neurodivergent traits, such as perfectionism and a preference for routine, have been associated with disordered eating and eating disorders.

    Research on adolescent girls found those with anorexia nervosa are more likely to exhibit neurodivergent (in this case, autistic) traits and behaviours. These include developing rules, resistance to change and a hyperfocus on body weight. These features are commonly seen in anorexia nervosa, an eating disorder characterised by restricted food intake, an intense fear of weight gain and body image disturbances.

    Meanwhile, impulsivity symptoms in ADHD have been associated with binge eating disorder. This can involve recurrent episodes of eating large amounts of food in a short period of time. Impulsivity may also be linked to bulimia nervosa, characterised by compensatory behaviours to prevent weight gain after binge eating (such as exessive exercise).

    Some studies indicate a link between ADHD, alexithymia (difficulty experiencing, identifying and expressing emotions) and overeating behaviours such as emotional eating.

    Finally, neurodivergent people are more likely to identify as part of the LGBTQIA+ community, experience trauma and also have a mental health condition. Each of these considerations increases the likelihood someone will experience an eating disorder.

    How does this affect treatment?

    Despite the overlap between eating disorders and neurodivergence, current treatment approaches don’t meet the diverse needs of those affected.

    Eating disorder treatment often has moderate success at best. For neurodivergent people, the outcomes are worse than for their neurotypical counterparts.

    Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT), a broad range of treatments based on the interaction between thoughts, feelings and behaviours, is less beneficial for neurodivergent people. Yet this is often part of treatment for eating disorders. Autistic women have suggested CBT is less accessible due to its blanket approach and the assumption they have the skills needed to benefit.

    There have been calls from organisations such as the National Eating Disorders Collaboration and lived experience advocates to improve access to neurodiversity-affirming care models for neurodivergent people affected by eating disorders.

    Such care recognised and safely accommodates the multiple ways neurodivergence is related to feeding and eating behaviour.

    Research suggests eating disorder treatment can be successfully adapted for neurodivergent people based on the following principles:

    1. equal partnership. Including neurodivergent people as equal partners in their care and as decision-makers, and elevating their own experiences

    2. embracing and celebrating differences. Neurodivergent traits should not be considered a deficit, or something to be “treated” or “fixed”. Rather, neurodivergent traits should be celebrated to nourish a positive sense of identity

    3. accommodations. Neurodivergent traits and preferences are respected and accommodated. As an example, this might include reducing sensory inputs (the smell, sounds and lights) in a dining area, or a meal plan that is predictable and considers a person’s sensory sensitivities.

    Treatment for eating disorders should also be gender-affirming (interventions that support and affirm someone’s gender identity) and trauma-informed.

    If this article has raised issues for you, free resources and support is available from the Butterfly National Helpline by calling 1800 ED HOPE (1800 33 4673), or by visiting Eating Disorders Neurodiversity Australia or Autism Connect.

    Breanna Lepre works for The University of Queensland and is a member of Dietitians Australia. Breanna is neurodivergent and has lived experience of an eating disorder.

    Lauren Ball works for The University of Queensland and receives funding from the National Health and Medical Research Council, Queensland Health and Mater Misericordia. She is a Director of Dietitians Australia, a Director of the Darling Downs and West Moreton Primary Health Network and an Associate Member of the Australian Academy of Health and Medical Sciences.

    – ref. Autistic people and those with ADHD are more likely to have eating disorders. Here’s why – and how this affects their treatment – https://theconversation.com/autistic-people-and-those-with-adhd-are-more-likely-to-have-eating-disorders-heres-why-and-how-this-affects-their-treatment-238759

    MIL OSI Analysis – EveningReport.nz –

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Woman charged with high range drink driving following Kings Meadows crash

    Source: Tasmania Police

    Woman charged with high range drink driving following Kings Meadows crash

    Monday, 30 September 2024 – 2:23 pm.

    A 45-year-old woman from Nunamara has been charged with drink driving following a crash at Kings Meadows on Saturday.
    Inspector Craig Fox said police and other emergency services were called to the scene on Kings Meadows Link about 2pm, arriving to find the woman nearby the crashed vehicle.
    “The woman later returned a breath analysis reading of 0.314, over six times the legal limit,” he said.
    “She was arrested and charged with exceeding the prescribed alcohol limit, driving whist disqualified, breaching bail, and other related offences.”
    “Her vehicle was also seized and police will apply for it to be forfeited.”
    “Police would like to thank those members of the public who contacted police and provided information about the crash.”
    The woman is due to appear in the St Helens Magistrates Court on 2 October.
    Anyone with further information is asked to contact police on 131 444 or Crime Stoppers on 1800 333 000 or at crimestopperstas.com.au. Information can be provided anonymously.

    MIL OSI News –

  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: MEDIA RELEASE – Samoa Police members visit Australia to boost capability ahead of CHOGM

    Source: Government of Western Samoa

    Share this:

    This is a joint media release between the AFP and Samoa Police, Prisons and Corrections Services (Samoa Police).

    (20th September 2024)- Officers from Samoa Police have undertaken specialist police tactical group training with the Australian Federal Police in Canberra last month, as Samoa continues to ramp up its operational readiness ahead of the 2024 Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting (CHOGM) being held in the Pacific nation in October.

    The Samoa Police Tactical Operations Section (TOS) worked closely with members of the AFP’s Tactical Response Team (TRT) on specialist first response training to address operational risks ahead of CHOGM and to build capacity and capability.

    The training was delivered under the Samoa Australia Police Partnership (SAPP) which this year celebrates 15 years of partnership between the AFP and Samoa Police. Ten TOS officers participated in a range of training drills and scenarios focused on the tactical resolution of high-risk incidents ahead of the major Commonwealth event.

    The Samoan officers were provided with insights into the valuable role the AFP TRT plays in major events both in Australia and internationally, along with how the AFP strategically prepares and trains to ensure members deliver a safe and secure high-profile event.

    The most recent training opportunity between AFP and the Samoa Police is the latest in the nation’s preparations for CHOGM, with AFP working closely with Samoa over the past two years in preparation of the event. The tactical training complements the tactical communications training collaboration in April this year.

    CHOGM is the Commonwealth’s primary political meeting, which is held every two years and where leaders discuss global economic, environmental and security challenges and how to work together to overcome them.

    AFP Detective Superintendent Daniel Evans said the training provided by the AFP’s Tactical Response Team would support interoperability and capability of the Samoa Police ahead of CHOGM.

    “The valuable skills and insights members of Samoa’s Police’s Tactical Operations Section have gained while in Australia will ensure they are equipped and ready for any scenario ahead of CHOGM,” Detective Superintendent Evans said.

    “The AFP is committed to providing ongoing support to the Samoa Police and Samoa Government ahead of CHOGM by providing advice, funding and access to AFP capability and training.

    “We look forward to working alongside our Samoa Police colleagues to deliver a safe and successful event.”

    Samoa Police Commissioner Auapaau Logoitino Filipo said the training continued to enhance Samoa Police’s capability ahead of CHOGM.

    “This training also reflects the 15 years of partnership with the AFP that has grown and strengthened into what it is today,” Commissioner Filipo said.

    “The advancement in tactical policing ahead of CHOGM improves our ability to deliver the event but also safety and security to the people and communities of Samoa on a daily basis.”

    While in Canberra, TOS officers and AFP members visited the National Police Memorial where they laid a wreath in memory of Samoa Police Senior Sergeant Peniamina Perite who was killed in the line of duty last month.

    Media enquiries:

    AFP Media: (02) 5126 9297

    Connect with us:

    Follow our Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, Instagram and YouTube pages to learn more about what the AFP does to keep Australia safe.

    Share this:

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News –