Category: Banking

  • MIL-OSI: Erin Lassel Joins First American Bank as Associate General Counsel

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    MIAMI, Feb. 06, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — First American Bank is proud to announce that Erin Lassel has joined the bank as Associate General Counsel. With over 10 years of experience in commercial real estate law, Erin will play a pivotal role in advancing the bank’s strategic initiatives, joining the broader Legal team that supports the bank’s diverse markets across Illinois, Florida, Wisconsin, and beyond.

    As the bank grows its presence in South Florida, Erin’s legal expertise will be instrumental in addressing complex challenges and ensuring the bank’s operations align with the evolving needs of its regional, national, and global customer base.

    “Joining First American Bank is an exciting opportunity to contribute to the bank’s commitment to excellence and customer-focused solutions,” said Erin Lassel, Associate General Counsel. “I look forward to leveraging my legal expertise to help shape the future of the bank, support its growth, and champion the delivery of innovative financial services to our customers.”

    Christine Childers, Deputy General Counsel at First American Bank, added, “Erin’s extensive experience in commercial real estate law and her leadership skills make her a strong fit for our team. Her expertise will be invaluable as we expand our South Florida operations and strengthen our market position.”

    Before joining First American Bank, Erin was a partner at Katz Barron in Coral Gables and Fort Lauderdale, where she represented clients across Florida in real estate and business transactions. She earned her Juris Doctor (J.D.) magna cum laude from Florida International University, ranking in the top 10% of her class, and served as Executive Symposium Editor for the Florida International University Law Review. Erin also holds a B.A. in Accounting, summa cum laude, from the University of Miami.

    “We are pleased to welcome Erin to the team,” said Brian Hagan, Florida Market President at First American Bank. “Her distinguished legal background, combined with her leadership and knowledge of the South Florida market, makes her an invaluable addition as we continue to expand our footprint in the region and build on our reputation for excellence.”

    First American Bank is a Member FDIC.

    Contact:
    Teresa Lee 
    305-631-6400 
    tlee@firstambank.com

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI: Backbase and Feedzai Partnership Integrates Financial Crime Prevention into Backbase Platform

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    SAN MATEO, Calif., Feb. 06, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Backbase, a provider of engagement banking solutions, announces a strategic partnership with Feedzai, a company providing AI-native fraud prevention solutions, aiming to support financial institutions in addressing digital fraud while maintaining operational efficiency in customer interactions. The collaboration integrates Feedzai’s Digital Trust solutions with Backbase’s Engagement Banking Platform, offering financial institutions tools designed to enhance fraud prevention, support secure banking environments, and optimize digital customer experiences.

    “By combining Backbase’s engagement banking expertise with Feedzai’s advanced security capabilities, we’re giving financial institutions the complete package – superior customer experience and intelligent fraud prevention in one integrated platform,” said Jouk Pleiter CEO & Founder at Backbase. “Together, we’re setting a new standard for how banks can build trusted digital relationships with their customers.”

    The partnership offers financial institutions the following benefits:

    • Proactive fraud prevention with real-time AI-powered behavioral analysis across all digital channels.
    • Operational efficiency with AI-powered risk assessment designed to reduce false positives and associated costs.
    • Seamless integration with the Backbase Engagement Banking Platform and its suite of products, providing direct access to Feedzai’s security capabilities.

    The integration of Feedzai’s Digital Trust platform—which monitors user behavior, device integrity, and potential threats in real time—with Backbase’s Engagement Banking Platform aims to support secure and efficient digital banking experiences. Backbase facilitates customer interactions, while Feedzai’s security framework operates in the background to help safeguard digital transactions without disrupting the user experience.

    “As the financial services industry evolves, security can no longer be an afterthought — it must be woven into the very fabric of the customer experience,” said Nuno Sebastiao, CEO and Co-Founder at Feedzai. “By partnering with Backbase, we’re empowering financial institutions to deliver a unified, seamless journey that not only protects customers from fraud, but also ensures they feel valued, understood, and safe.”

    About Feedzai
    Feedzai provides an end-to-end financial crime prevention platform, utilizing AI-driven solutions to support the detection and prevention of fraud and financial crime. Financial institutions use Feedzai’s technology to manage risk and compliance processes, with the platform designed to help safeguard transactions while supporting customer privacy and experience. For more information, users can visit feedzai.com.

    About Backbase
    Backbase provides the Engagement Banking Platform, a composable solution designed to support banks in their digital transformation efforts by modernizing key customer journeys. The platform helps streamline processes across onboarding, servicing, lending, and investing, aiming to enhance both customer and employee experiences. It is pre-integrated with core banking systems and fintech solutions to support scalability and operational efficiency.

    Industry analysts Forrester, Gartner, Celent, Omdia and IDC continuously recognize Backbase’s for its role in the engagement banking sector. The Backbase Engagement Banking Platform is used by over 150 financial institutions worldwide — including AIB, Banorte, Barclays, BIAT, Bank of the Philippine Islands, BDO, BNP Paribas, Banque Saudi Fransi, BRD, Citibank, Discovery Bank, First National Bank, HDFC, Ila Bank, KeyBank, Lloyds Banking Group, NatWest, Navy Federal Credit Union, OTP Group, PostFinance, Raiffeisen, Standard Bank, Saudi National Bank, Société Générale, Truist, and TPBank. 

    Backbase is a private fintech company, founded in 2003 in Amsterdam (Global HQ), with regional offices in Atlanta (Americas HQ), Cardiff, Dubai, Hyderabad, Kraków, London, Mexico City, Singapore (Asia HQ), Sydney, and Toronto. Users can visit www.backbase.com for more.

    Contacts

    Austin Hyslip
    Feedzai
    austin.hyslip@feedzai.com
    Alex Papaioannou
    Backbase
    press-relations@backbase.com

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI USA: Booker, Kennedy Introduce Bill to Give Small Businesses Increased Access to Disaster Loans

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for New Jersey Cory Booker
    WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Senators Cory Booker (D-NJ) and John Kennedy (R-LA), a member of the Senate Appropriations and Banking Committees, introduced the Small Business Disaster Damage Fairness Act of 2025. The bill would allow borrowers to get a Small Business Administration (SBA) disaster assistance loan for up to $50,000, rather than the current $14,000, without pledging collateral.
    Despite rising costs, the collateral threshold has remained stagnant for over a decade. The collateral threshold for major disasters has been at $14,000 since 2008 for SBA-declared disasters. In 2015, Congress passed Booker and Kennedy’s Rebuilding Small Businesses After Disasters Act, which temporarily increased the SBA collateral threshold to $25,000 in 2015.
    “New Jerseyans are unfortunately too familiar with the impacts of extreme weather, from hurricanes to major flooding events. The last thing homeowners and small businesses should need to worry about is how they will access the funding they need to rebuild after a storm. This bill will help ensure small businesses everywhere have the support they need to recover in the wake of a disaster,” said Senator Booker.
    “Too many small business owners can’t put up collateral for a loan when disaster strikes. As a result, they can’t re-open their doors. My bill would make sure small businesses can get back to serving their communities after disasters hit,” said Senator Kennedy.
    The SBA’s Disaster Loan Program is designed to help homeowners, renters, businesses and nonprofits repair, rebuild and recover from disaster-related losses. In 2024, there were 27 weather-related disasters that caused at least $1 billion in damage.
    The bill also codifies the Government Accountability Office (GAO)’s recommendation to distinguish between rural and urban communities for outreach and instructs the GAO to further report the Disaster Loan Program’s default rate.
    U.S. Senator Mazie Hirono (D-HI) cosponsored the bill.
    The read the full text of the bill, click here.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Canada: More support for Jasper’s recovery

    Source: Government of Canada regional news (2)

    MIL OSI Canada News

  • MIL-OSI: Clean Core Thorium Energy Raises $15.5M in Series Seed

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    CHICAGO, Feb. 06, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Clean Core Thorium Energy (CCTE) has raised a $15.5M Series Seed round of financing to advance the ANEEL fuel – a patented blend of thorium & HALEU designed to be seamlessly deployed into existing reactors. With plans to commercialize in 2026, the capital will be used towards solidifying the company’s technical partnerships, such as the irradiation test at Idaho National Laboratory (INL), the further validation work at Canadian Nuclear Laboratories (CNL), a planned Demonstration Irradiation, and more. Further, this financing will be used to fund activities related to the company’s hiring, supply chain partnerships, and regulatory and licensing requirements.

    The syndicate of investors participating in this round are led by a Singapore-based family office and notable business leaders including Sumant Sinha, CEO and Founder of ReNew, Lakshmi Narayanan, former CEO of Cognizant Technologies, and Deepak Parekh, former Chairman of HDFC Bank.

    Mehul Shah, CCTE’s CEO and Founder, said:

    “We are not only excited to have fresh capital infused in the business for critical growth, but also ecstatic to invite those with deep ties to the global energy industry as advisors and investors to accelerate our progress. This announcement marks the next chapter in CCTE’s growth to revolutionize nuclear energy.

    By demonstrating thorium’s ability to deliver immediate and substantial operational benefits, we can accelerate the renewed momentum of nuclear. This new fuel cycle enhances reactor economics, strengthens energy security, improves safety, and ensures proliferation resistance—all within an existing and proven reactor system.”

    In 2024, CCTE achieved major milestones to advance the ANEEL fuel, including:

    About Clean Core Thorium Energy
    Clean Core Thorium Energy is a nuclear fuel company exploring thorium-driven nuclear innovations. Clean Core’s patented nuclear fuel technology (called the ANEEL™ fuel) is comprised of thorium and high assay low-enriched uranium (HALEU) and is capable of improving the safety and cost-efficiency of pressurized heavy-water reactors. The ANEEL™ fuel is a novel solution to safety, waste, and proliferation concerns in today’s nuclear plants. Learn more at https://cleancore.energy/. Follow us on social media: LinkedIn and X.

    Contact: info@cleancore.energy

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI Economics: TWAAO: BaFin warns against offers on website twaao.com

    Source: Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht – In English

    The financial supervisory authority BaFin warns against offers on the website twaao.com. According to information available to BaFin, TWAAO allegedly based in Frankfurt is offering financial and investment services and crypto-asset services without the required authorisation.

    Anyone offering financial or investment services or crypto-asset services in Germany requires a license from BaFin. However, some companies offer such services without the required license. Information on whether a particular company is authorized by BaFin can be found in the company database.

    The information provided by BaFin is based on Section 37 (4) of the German Banking Act (KWG) and Section 10 (7) of the German Crypto Markets Supervision Act (KMAG).

    Please be aware:

    BaFin, the German Federal Criminal Police Office (BundeskriminalamtBKA) and the German state criminal police offices (Landeskriminalämter) recommend that consumers seeking to invest money online should exercise the utmost caution and do the necessary research beforehand in order to identify fraud attempts at an early stage.

    MIL OSI Economics

  • MIL-OSI Economics: ReFi Solutions: BaFin warns consumers against offers on website refi-solutions.com

    Source: Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht – In English

    The Federal Financial Supervisory Authority BaFin warns consumers against offers from the company ReFi Solutions or Remote Finance Solutions on website refi-solutions.com. According to information available to BaFin, banking transactions and financial services are being provided on this website without the required authorisation.

    Anyone conducting banking business or providing financial or investment services in Germany may do so only with authorisation from BaFin. However, some companies offer these services without the required authorisation. Information on whether companies have been authorised by BaFin can be found in BaFin’s database of companies.

    The information provided by BaFin is based on section 37 (4) of the German Banking Act (Kreditwesengesetz – KWG).

    Please be aware:

    BaFin, the German Federal Criminal Police Office (BundeskriminalamtBKA) and the German state criminal police offices (Landeskriminalämter) recommend that consumers seeking to invest money online should exercise the utmost caution and do the necessary research beforehand in order to identify fraud attempts at an early stage.

    MIL OSI Economics

  • MIL-OSI Economics: Grow State Markets: BaFin warns against website fina-eu.growstatemarkets.com (previously: growstatemarkets.com)

    Source: Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht – In English

    The financial supervisory authority BaFin warns against trading platform Grow State Markets. According to its findings, financial, investment and crypto asset services are provided by Grow State Markets (which in the past operated the website growstatemarkets.com) without the required authorisation. The company is not supervised by the alleged FINAEU (European Financial Authority). There is no FINAEU supervisory authority and it does not supervise companies that operate in the financial sector.

    FINAEU was already a subject of a warning issued by BaFin on 29 August 2024.

    Anyone conducting banking business or providing financial or investment services in Germany may do so only with authorisation from BaFin. However, some companies offer these services without the required authorisation. Information on whether companies have been authorised by BaFin can be found in BaFin’s database of companies.

    The information provided by BaFin is based on Section 37 (4) of the German Banking Act (KWG) and Section 10 (7) of the German Crypto Markets Supervision Act (KMAG).

    Please be aware:

    BaFin, the German Federal Criminal Police Office (BundeskriminalamtBKA) and the German state criminal police offices (Landeskriminalämter) recommend that consumers seeking to invest money online should exercise the utmost caution and do the necessary research beforehand in order to identify fraud attempts at an early stage.

    MIL OSI Economics

  • MIL-OSI United Nations: International Community Must Keep Pushing for Permanent Ceasefire, Work towards Gaza’s Reconstruction, Secretary-General Tells Palestinian Rights Committee

    Source: United Nations General Assembly and Security Council

    Speakers Urge Member States to Fully Support UN Palestine Refugee Agency’s Vital Work, Stress Rising Violence by Israeli Settlers in West Bank Must Stop

    The international community must keep pushing for a permanent ceasefire and work towards the reconstruction of Gaza, the UN Chief told the Palestinian Rights Committee today, highlighting the essential role of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA) in the process.

    “At its essence, the exercise of the inalienable rights of the Palestinian people is about the right of Palestinians to simply live as human beings in their own land,” said UN Secretary-General António Guterres in his remarks to the Committee on the Exercise of the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People as it opened its 2025 session.

    However, the realization of those rights steadily slips farther out of reach as the world witnesses “chilling, systematic dehumanization and demonization of an entire people”, he said.  Nearly 50,000 people — 70 per cent of them women and children — have been reported killed and most of Gaza’s civilian infrastructure — hospitals, schools and water facilities — has been destroyed.  Displacement after displacement, hunger and disease left an entire generation homeless and traumatized.

    “We cannot go back to more death and destruction,” he asserted, adding that the UN is working around the clock to reach Palestinians in need and scale up support.  That requires rapid, safe, unimpeded, expanded and sustained humanitarian access, he said, calling on Member States to fully fund humanitarian operations and support UNRWA’s vital work.

    In the search for solutions, it is crucial to stay true to the bedrock of international law and avoid any form of ethnic cleansing, he stressed, adding that a viable, sovereign Palestinian State living side by side in peace and security with Israel is “the only sustainable solution for Middle East stability”.

    Relatedly, he voiced grave concern over rising violence by Israeli settlers and other violations in the occupied West Bank, including East Jerusalem.  “The violence must stop,” he said, urging respect for international law, including the International Court of Justice orders.

    “The ceasefire was a decisive step forward in providing aid and safety,” said Coly Seck (Senegal), the elected Chair of the Committee for 2025.  He called on States to “reinvent strategies to block the way for those enemies of peace on Palestinian ground” and on the international community to defend “these people long oppressed”, adding:  “This is a key year for the Palestinian cause.”

    Permanent Observer for State of Palestine Rejects Concept of ‘Ceasefire in the Gaza Strip and Open Hell in the West Bank’

    Riyad H. Mansour, Permanent Observer for the State of Palestine, said that while “we are delighted to have a ceasefire”, the agreement must become permanent and cover all parts of the Occupied Palestinian Territory.  He rejected the concept of “a ceasefire in the Gaza Strip and open hell in the West Bank”, and underscored the need to implement all the agreement’s provisions, including the reconstruction of Gaza and the safe return of the Palestinians to the areas from which they were displaced.

    Outlining his objectives for 2025, he stressed that defending UNRWA — the most successful story of multilateralism since the UN’s inception — is paramount.  Furthermore, he outlined his plan to work with all Member States towards a successful international conference in June, co-chaired by Saudi Arabia and France, to accomplish the objectives established by the International Court of Justice. The body determined that prolonged occupation of the Palestinian Territory is unlawful and must be terminated as quickly as possible.  Echoing that, the General Assembly legislated that this illegal occupation must be terminated within one year.

    Underscoring the need to rebuild Gaza, he declared:  “It is part of our homeland, and we do not have a homeland other than the State of Palestine [nor] are we looking for other homelands or countries”.  Rejecting any idea of ethnic cleansing, he urged all countries to help Palestine’s Government in this endeavour.  Accordingly, he spotlighted “intense meetings and communications” between President Mahmoud Abbas and the leaders of Jordan, Egypt and Saudi Arabia.

    “There is no power on Earth that can remove the Palestinian people from our ancestral homeland, including Gaza,” he said, adding that the return of 400,000 Palestinians to the north is “our answer for those who want us to kick us out of Gaza”.

    UNRWA Is Stabilizing Force, Committed Partner to Peace, Agency Official Says

    Greta Gunnarsdottir, Head of the UNRWA Liaison Office in New York, speaking on behalf of the Agency’s Commissioner-General, Philippe Lazarini, said that, although the Knesset legislation prohibiting UNRWA’s operations creates challenges, the Agency’s local staff continues to operate “at considerable personal risk” in the occupied West Bank.  While operations in Gaza continue, it is unclear how the contact prohibition with Israeli officials will constrain the Agency’s work.  Since the ceasefire, UNRWA has distributed food to 750,000 people and conducted 17,000 medical consultations; in January, 260,000 children enrolled in its online learning programmes.

    However, she emphasized curtailing UNRWA’s operations will undermine the ceasefire and sabotage Gaza’s recovery and political transition.  “The Government of Israel is investing significant resources to portray the Agency as a terrorist organization,” she said, adding that — as a result — donors are declining or reducing funding.  “For 75 years, UNRWA has been a stabilizing force and a committed partner for peace in the Occupied Palestinian Territory.  It must be allowed to remain so until a political solution is at hand,” she stated.

    UN Special Rapporteur on the Right to Food Calls Israel’s Starving of 2.3 Million Palestinians in Gaza ‘Fastest Starvation Campaign in Modern History’

    Michael Fakhri, UN Special Rapporteur on the Right to Food, speaking via video conference, recalled that Israel announced its intent to starve the civilians in Gaza on 6 October 2023 — before the Hamas attacks.  On the reached agreement, he said:  “This is not a ceasefire, [but] a slowing down of Israel’s genocide and starvation campaign.”

    On 6 October 2023, Gaza had been under a blockade for 23 years, with 50 per cent of its civilians already food insecure and 80 per cent dependent on humanitarian aid.  “How is it even possible for Israel to starve 2.3 million Palestinians in Gaza so quickly and so completely,” he asked, citing it as “the fastest starvation campaign in modern history”.

    One of the reasons for UNRWA’s creation in 1948 was to prevent the starvation of the Palestinian people, he pointed out, stressing that “there has always been the risk of starvation”.  The International Court of Justice has recognized the risk of genocide and the occurrence of starvation, as reflected in its warrants on the crime of starvation against Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defence Minister Yoav Gallant.

    The right of return and the right to self-determination of the Palestinian people constitute the foundation necessary for future political solutions, he continued.  Israel has been attacking Palestinians “at degrees of violence not seen before”, destroying food systems and creating conditions of hunger that will last for generations.  Moreover, it has attacked the UN itself — it shot at peacekeepers in Lebanon, killed a record number of UN staff in Gaza, mostly UNRWA, and declared the Secretary-General a persona non grata.

    Nonetheless, he emphasized that without the support of the United States and Germany — among others — Israel would be unable to implement its starvation campaign and commit genocide.  Washington, D.C., under the previous administration, exited international law, while “the current administration exited the UN” by defunding UNRWA, threatening to defund the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) and withdrawing from the Human Rights Council. “What is at stake is the international legal order and the UN itself,” he warned, highlighting the importance of the Hague Group, which was created to implement the decisions of the International Court of Justice and the International Criminal Court.

    Recounting Death of Relatives in Gaza Due to Israeli Bombings, UNRWA USA Philanthropy Director Stresses ‘We Will Continue’

    “My world shuttered for the first time on 24 November 2023, when Israel dropped a bomb on the family home where my brother lived,” said Hani Almadhoun, Senior Director of Philanthropy at UNRWA USA, also recalling the humiliation of his other brother, who was falsely accused of being a fighter.  “Palestinian men were paraded by the Israeli army in their underwear as if they were part of some grotesque spectacle,” he observed.  While his non-profit organization supports UNRWA’s work, he noted that individual efforts — no matter how heartfelt — cannot replace the comprehensive support of an established institution like UNRWA.  He further recalled that, in February 2024, together with his brother Mahmoud, he co-founded the Gaza Soup Kitchen, which soon became a “lifeline” serving hot meals to thousands of families.

    When hospitals were under siege, Mahmoud also created a medical clinic that provided baby formula and diapers and founded a small school for 560 children.  He said that “forcing the Palestinians out of Gaza is as unrealistic as draining the ocean”, stating:  “Whenever the world failed the Palestinian people […] the land did not.”  His concluded by citing the words of his brother Mahmoud, who was killed by an Israeli strike in November 2024: “We will continue.”

    Committee Members Highlight UNRWA’s Indispensable Role, Reject Any Attempts to Expel Palestinians from Occupied Palestinian Territory

    In the ensuing discussions, Committee members highlighted UNRWA’s indispensable role, with Cuba’s delegate stressing that “to prohibit the work of the Agency today means undermining the present and the future of the Palestinian people”.

    While Guyana’s delegate underscored that “the ceasefire must be a stepping stone towards the lasting peace”, her counterpart from Venezuela warned that the latest developments in the West Bank could threaten the agreement.

    Others, including Nicaragua’s representative, rejected the recent declarations that imply attempts to expel the Palestinian population from its territories.  A displacement plan — “even opening it for discussion” — is unacceptable, said Türkiye’s representative.

    Echoing that, Qatar’s delegate said that, during the comprehensive reconstruction process in Gaza, the international community must ensure that Palestinians remain on their land.

    For her part, Egypt’s delegate said that commemorating the Committee’s fiftieth anniversary manifests “the failure of the international community to assist the Palestinian people”.

    2025 Work Programme Adopted, Bureau Elected  

    In other business, the Committee adopted its work programme for 2025 and unanimously elected Coly Seck (Senegal) as Chair and Neville Melvin Gertze (Namibia), Jaime Hermida Castillo (Nicaragua), Ahmad Faisal Muhamad (Malaysia), Arrmanatha Christiawan Nasir (Indonesia) and Ernesto Soberón Guzmán (Cuba) as Vice-Chairs.

    MIL OSI United Nations News

  • MIL-OSI: TAB Bank Finishes 2024 Providing Nearly 300 Companies with $57 Million in Loans for Growth and Operations

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Q4 2024 funding includes factoring, asset-based and equipment loans, small business lines of credit and more for companies in transportation, manufacturing and distribution, e-commerce, maintenance, logistics and other industries

    OGDEN, Utah, Feb. 06, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — TAB Bank provided nearly 300 companies with more than $57 million in funding in the fourth quarter of 2024. The financing includes factoring, asset-based and equipment loans, small business lines of credit and more for companies in transportation, manufacturing and distribution, e-commerce, maintenance, logistics and other industries. TAB Bank offers vital capital to help companies meet their growth and success goals.

    Highlights of the largest Q4 2024 deals include:

    • $20 million—Funding numerous companies for their equipment needs.
    • $12 million—Steel Capital Management, a New York City-based finance company specializing in e-commerce solutions.
    • $11 million—Providing almost 100 small businesses with lines of credit for growth.
    • $5 million—A transportation maintenance solutions company in Dallas, Texas.
    • $4 million—A Kentucky company that owns, operates and manages multi-tenant communication tower sites across the U.S.

    For more than 25 years, TAB Bank’s core business has been financing over-the-road truckers and the broader transportation industry. This quarter, TAB Bank provided term loans and lines of credit ranging from $40,000 to $300,000 to transportation and logistics companies to help create consistent operational cash flow.

    “The most successful companies grow by compounding their returns, and using strategic debt financing can be a powerful tool to fuel that growth,” said Terri K. Lins, Chief Credit Officer at TAB Bank. “Our focus is to create financing programs tailored to each company’s specific goals—whether expanding inventory, investing in new equipment or ramping up marketing and promotions. We succeed when we help our customers leverage money in the right way to maximize their growth potential.”

    The bank’s services include working capital, equipment financing, term loans, lines of credit and commercial real estate loans. TAB Bank’s specialists ensure each client is matched with the right financial product for their industry and growth stage. The bank supports businesses with stellar credit and those without, requiring alternative assessments. To determine creditworthiness, the bank considers various factors, such as income and operational history.

    For more information on TAB Bank’s capital financing and credit solutions, visit TABBank.com.

    About TAB Bank
    At TAB Bank, our mission is to unlock dreams with bold financial solutions that empower individuals and businesses nationwide. We are committed to making financial success accessible to everyone through our innovative banking products. Our dedication drives us to continuously improve, ensuring that we meet the evolving needs of our clients with excellence and agility. For over 25 years, we have remained steadfast in offering tailored, technology-enabled solutions designed to simplify and enhance the banking experience. 

    For more information about how we can help you achieve your financial dreams, visit www.TABBank.com.

    Contact Information:
    Trevor Morris
    Director of Marketing
    801-624-5172
    trevor.morris@tabbank.com

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI Global: Trump plans to ‘permanently resettle’ Palestinians outside Gaza – the very reason Unrwa was originally created

    Source: The Conversation – UK – By Anne Irfan, Lecturer in Interdisciplinary Race, Gender and Postcolonial Studies, UCL

    Donald Trump shocked much of the world when he announced plans for the US to “take over” Gaza. Speaking at a press conference with the Israeli prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, the US president outlined a plan to “resettle” Gaza’s population of nearly 2.2 million Palestinians elsewhere in the Arab world. Several officials later added that this resettlement would be temporary while Gaza was rebuilt.

    Governments around the world were quick to condemn the planwith politicians and human rights advocates pointing out that it would amount to ethnic cleansing.

    Conversely, Netanyahu praised Trump for “thinking outside the box with fresh ideas”. Yet while there is no question that this plan violates international law, it is not as unprecedented as these responses suggest.

    Successive Israeli governments, often with clandestine US support, have long sought a similar “solution” for Gaza’s Palestinians, 66% of whom are already refugees from the Nakba (catastrophe) of 1948. At that time, Zionist militias and the Israeli army displaced and expelled 750,000 Palestinians before and during the First Arab-Israeli war.

    In fact, that’s the very reason the US supported the creation of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (Unrwa) in 1949. Though its purpose today is very different, it was originally intended as a tool to permanently resettle the Palestinians outside Palestine.

    The idea for Unrwa was inspired by the experience of the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA), a US government agency established during the Great Depression. It promoted resource development through large public works programmes in the deep south.

    US officials considered the TVA a prototype for managing the Palestinian refugee crisis and pushed the newly established United Nations to set up an agency that would similarly create jobs and economic development.

    This was the “works” in Unrwa’s title. As they saw it, employment opportunities would encourage the Palestinians to integrate into their places of exile. Meanwhile, the resulting economic development would lessen resistance in the host state to the refugees’ permanent resettlement.

    In four of the five territories where Unrwa operates – Lebanon, Jordan, Syria and the West Bank – it spent its first few years designing large public works projects. But in Gaza, the large concentration of refugees in a tiny territory with limited natural resources did not lend itself to public works projects.

    Instead US officials pushed Unrwa to resettle Palestinians outside of the Strip, in Sinai, Libya and further afield.

    Yet Unrwa’s efforts on this front quickly ran into a major obstacle: the Palestinians themselves. The refugees clearly understood that the “integration” projects and jobs schemes were intended to make their exile permanent – despite the UN having officially recognised their right to return home.

    By the late 1950s, the refugees’ persistent refusal participate in these programmes led Unrwa to shift its focus to education.

    Repeated expulsions

    The desire to forcibly transfer Gaza’s population never really disappeared. Gaza has been home to Palestinian refugees from across the country, with a huge political significance as a result, and its demographics have repeatedly been deemed unacceptable by elements of the Israeli state.

    Soon after it began occupying Gaza and the West Bank in 1967, the Israeli military forcibly expelled 200,000 Palestinians from Gaza to Jordan. Four year later, Shimon Peres, then the Israeli minister of transport and communications, sought to forcibly transfer more Palestinians into the Sinai. And around the same time, the Israeli government looked into relocating Gaza’s population to sites as far away as Iraq, Canada and Brazil.

    Such ideas persist in Israel. Shortly after Israel began its war on Gaza in response to the Hamas attacks of October 7 2023, there was also evidence in the form of a leaked intelligence report that the government was considering forcibly transferring Palestinians to Sinai.

    More recently, the White House administration floated the possibility of transferring Gaza’s population to Indonesia. And Trump spoke in alarming terms shortly after his inauguration of “cleaning out” the Strip.

    There’s no connection between the US president’s plan, as outlined this week, and the early US-backed idea to found Unrwa as an agency to oversee resettlement of Gaza’s population. Unrwa had abandoned its resettlement policy by the mid-1950s – and, in any case, Trump has long been one of Unrwa’s most virulent opponents.

    In 2018, he became the first US president to fully defund the agency. More recently he has been a vocal supporter of the Israeli Knesset’s ban on its operations.

    In the same press conference where Trump announced his plans for ethnic cleansing in Gaza, he also confirmed that he will extend the Biden administration’s ban on funding Unrwa.

    Yet Trump’s current plan is not a million miles away from the US government’s original intention for Unrwa. His apparent ignorance of this history suggests he is also unaware of the biggest likely obstacle to “permanent resettlement”.

    But he cannot ignore the historical resistance of the Palestinian people themselves to the seemingly endless plans to displace, dispossess and deny them their homeland.

    As Unrwa officials learned decades ago, the only “solution” for the question of the future of the Gaza Strip is a just and durable political process that accounts for the Palestinian people’s rights as well as Israeli security.

    Anne Irfan has received funding from the British Academy.

    Jo Kelcey has received funding from the Spencer Foundation.

    ref. Trump plans to ‘permanently resettle’ Palestinians outside Gaza – the very reason Unrwa was originally created – https://theconversation.com/trump-plans-to-permanently-resettle-palestinians-outside-gaza-the-very-reason-unrwa-was-originally-created-249185

    MIL OSI – Global Reports

  • MIL-OSI China: Foreign visitors experience China’s improved mobile payment environment over Spring Festival

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    Foreign visitors experience China’s improved mobile payment environment over Spring Festival

    BEIJING, Feb. 6 — Foreign visitors in China experienced a smoother, more convenient travel environment during this year’s Spring Festival, thanks to improvements to the country’s mobile payment systems.

    The latest data from the People’s Bank of China shows that the volume of transactions made by international tourists during the Chinese New Year holiday, which ran from Jan. 28 to Feb. 4 this year, surged significantly from last year. The total number of cross-border transactions processed by China UnionPay and NetsUnion Clearing Corporation increased 124.54 percent, and the total transaction value grew 90.49 percent.

    This jump in payment activity reflects not only the growing appeal of China as a travel destination but also the seamless integration of mobile payment systems for foreign visitors.

    In cities like Shanghai, foreign tourists can now use international credit cards or mobile payment apps such as Alipay for shopping, dining and sightseeing, which allowed tourists to enjoy the cultural experiences on offer fully during the Chinese New Year.

    German tourist Carla Uhrmacher, who visited the famous Yuyuan Garden in the eastern Chinese metropolis of Shanghai, was impressed by the ease with which she could use her mobile payment app to buy traditional Chinese crafts and souvenirs. “Whether using Visa or Mastercard, or mobile payment systems, it’s all very seamless,” she noted, highlighting how accessible these payment methods are for international visitors.

    This Spring Festival saw an increase in payment transactions and a significant rise in the number of foreign visitors to China. Inbound arrivals during this year’s Spring Festival hit a record high, with a 150 percent year-on-year leap reported, Lin Jian, a spokesperson for China’s foreign ministry, told a press conference on Wednesday, citing data from third-party platforms.

    While popular destinations such as Beijing, Shanghai and Guangzhou continued to attract large numbers of foreign travelers during the holiday, cities like Suzhou, Xi’an, Chengdu and Xiamen emerged as new favorites for international tourists using mobile payment services, Alipay data shows.

    This surge in international visitors can be largely attributed to China’s ongoing efforts to enhance its payment services for foreigners. The country has made it easier for international travelers to use their foreign credit cards by allowing them to link these cards directly to popular Chinese mobile payment platforms like Alipay and WeChat Pay.

    An increasing number of international e-wallets are now also supported for use in China. Alipay, for example, now allows users to link 13 different overseas e-wallets from countries like the Philippines, Thailand and Singapore.

    Though cashless payment services have improved significantly, foreign tourists can also take advantage of a network of nearly 70,000 bank branches, 320,000 ATMs, and currency exchange facilities across the country.

    This year’s Spring Festival also saw a notable increase in foreigner spending, particularly in cities like Beijing, where tourists from various countries flocked to shopping areas such as Qianmen Street to purchase souvenirs, local teas and trendy clothing.

    This spending boom is backed by figures, with the number of transactions made by foreign visitors on WeChat increasing 134 percent compared to last year’s Spring Festival, and with the total spent via Alipay rising 150 percent during the first five days of the holiday. These figures reflect not only the convenience of mobile payments but also the growing enthusiasm of foreign tourists to purchase Chinese goods and immerse themselves in local culture.

    An increasingly open China is becoming an even more attractive destination for international tourists as Chinese New Year is celebrated globally, and as payment services continue to improve, analysts in China have noted. And these improved payment experiences will make China travel even smoother and more enjoyable for international visitors.

    MIL OSI China News

  • MIL-OSI Banking: [Photo] An Inside Look at ISE 2025: Samsung Presents Color E-Paper and the Future of Commercial Displays

    Source: Samsung

    Integrated Systems Europe (ISE) 2025 kicked off on February 4 in Barcelona, highlighting the latest advancements in commercial display technology.
     
    Samsung Electronics welcomed guests with a striking 462” The Wall media facade at the entrance to its booth — while inside, the company showcased its energy-efficient Color E-Paper display alongside AI-powered upgrades to the SmartThings Pro platform. The supersized 115” 4K Smart Signage display captivated visitors with its immersive visuals as well.
     
    Samsung Newsroom explored the booth firsthand and captured these innovations leading the future of commercial displays.
     
    ▲ Visitors marvel at The Wall’s stunning visuals powered by MICRO LED technology.
     
    ▲ (From left) Hoon Chung, Executive Vice President; SW Yong, President and Head of Visual Display (VD) Business; and Seong Cho, Executive Vice President of Europe Office, from Samsung Electronics admire The Wall.
     
    ▲ The ultra-low power Samsung Color E-Paper boasts a slim, lightweight design.
     
    ▲ Visitors examine Samsung VXT, a comprehensive cloud-based content management solution (CMS) platform.
     
    ▲ Visitors crowd around the SmartThings Pro wall to see how the B2B management platform has expanded to include enterprise-grade IoT devices.
     
    ▲ Visitors interact with the Google Cast feature newly added to Samsung’s 2025 hotel TV lineup.
     
    ▲ SW Yong, President and Head of Visual Display (VD) Business at Samsung Electronics, tries out the 2025 Interactive Display equipped with Samsung AI Assistant.
     
    ▲ The 115” (16:9) 4K Smart Signage display boasts an ultra-large screen optimized for office spaces, retail stores and other business environments.
     
    ▲ A visitor observes the 105” (21:9) 5K Smart Signage display‘s various innovative features that make it the perfect option for video conferences.

    MIL OSI Global Banks

  • MIL-OSI United Nations: Gaza: 10,000 aid trucks reached enclave since ceasefire began

    Source: United Nations 4

    Humanitarian Aid

    The humanitarian community’s plan to flood Gaza with lifesaving aid passed an important milestone on Thursday with the news that more than 10,000 relief lorries have entered the enclave since the ceasefire began on 19 January.

    Announcing the development, the UN’s top aid official, Tom Fletcher, said that the trucks contained lifesaving food, medicine, and tents – all desperately needed by Gazans after more than 15 months of constant Israeli bombardment.

    The UN emergency relief chief’s comments came as he prepared to join an aid convoy crossing into northern Gaza.

    In recent days, he has held “practical discussions” with the Israeli authorities in Tel Aviv and Jerusalem “to keep lifesaving UN aid moving into Gaza at scale”. This includes COGAT – the Israeli body responsible for approving requests to deliver aid into Gaza and the West Bank – and the Israel Foreign Ministry.

    Clearing rubble to live

    According to the UN aid coordination office, OCHA, more than half a million people have returned to north Gaza since the ceasefire began. Needs for food, water, sanitation, healthcare and tents are enormous, with some returning to former homes with shovels to clear the rubble, according to the UN Children’s Fund, UNICEF.

    In an update, the UN World Health Organization (WHO), said that it had received 63 trucks of medical supplies from aid partners to replenish its three warehouses in Gaza.

    In addition, more than 100 sick and injured patients have also been evacuated to Egypt for urgent medical treatment since the temporary ceasefire came into effect, while OCHA noted that primary and secondary health services are being provided throughout the Strip.

    Five ambulances entered Gaza to strengthen emergency response capacity on Tuesday, OCHA said in an update.

    Food production boosted

    The UN aid coordination agency noted that across Gaza, 22 bakeries supported by the World Food Programme (WFP) are now operational.

    The WFP has also provided nutrient supplements to more than 80,000 children and pregnant or breastfeeding women across Gaza, since the ceasefire took effect and UNICEF has continued distributing nutrition support for infants.

    Humanitarian partners have screened more than 30,000 children under the age of five for malnutrition since the ceasefire took effect. Of those screened, 1,150 cases of acute malnutrition have been identified, including 230 cases of severe acute malnutrition,” OCHA said.

    In addition, the UN Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) distributed nearly 100 metric tons of animal feed to support herders in Deir al Balah and Khan Younis, benefiting hundreds of people working in the agricultural sector.

    To sustain learning activities across the Strip, education partners have established three new temporary learning spaces yesterday in Gaza, Rafah and Khan Younis governorates, benefiting 200 school-aged children.

    Ceasefire push 

    The aid build-up came as the Secretary-General on Wednesday pushed for a permanent ceasefire in Gaza and the release of all remaining hostages in the enclave, while strongly rejecting the suggestion that Gazans should be resettled outside their homeland.

    “In the search for solutions, we must not make the problem worse. It is vital to stay true to the bedrock of international law. It is essential to avoid any form of ethnic cleansing,” Guterres told  the UN Committee on the Exercise of the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People, which met to set out its programme of work for the year. “We must reaffirm the two-State solution,” he said.

    Underlining the Secretary-General’s comments, the UN High Commissioner for human rights, Volker Türk, said that “any deportation or forced transfer of persons without legal basis is strictly forbidden”.

    MIL OSI United Nations News

  • MIL-OSI Global: Trump’s offshore wind energy freeze: What states lose if the executive order remains in place

    Source: The Conversation – USA – By Barbara Kates-Garnick, Professor of Practice in Energy Policy, Tufts University

    The offshore wind industry brings jobs and economic development. AP Photo/Seth Wenig

    A single wind turbine spinning off the U.S. Northeast coast today can power thousands of homes – without the pollution that comes from fossil fuel power plants. A dozen of those turbines together can produce enough electricity for an entire community.

    The opportunity to tap into such a powerful source of locally produced clean energy – and the jobs and economic growth that come with it – is why states from Maine to Virginia have invested in building a U.S. offshore wind industry.

    But much of that progress may now be at a standstill.

    One of Donald Trump’s first acts as president in January 2025 was to order a freeze on both leasing federal areas for new offshore wind projects and issuing federal permits for projects that are in progress.

    The U.S. Northeast and Northern California have the nation’s strongest offshore winds.
    NREL

    The order and Trump’s long-held antipathy toward wind power are creating massive uncertainty for a renewable energy industry at its nascent stage of development in the U.S., and ceding leadership and offshore wind technology to Europe and China.

    As a professor of energy policy and former undersecretary of energy for Massachusetts, I’ve seen the potential for offshore wind power, and what the Northeast, New York and New Jersey, as well as the U.S. wind industry, stand to lose if that growth is shut down for the next four years.

    Expectations fall from 30 gigawatts by 2030

    The Northeast’s coastal states are at the end of the fossil fuel energy pipeline. But they have an abundant local resource that, when built to scale, could provide significant clean energy, jobs and supply chain manufacturing. It could also help the states achieve their ambitious goals to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions and their impact on climate change.

    The Biden administration set a national offshore wind goal of 30 gigawatts of capacity in 2030 and 110 gigawatts by 2050. It envisioned an industry supporting 77,000 jobs and powering 10 million homes while cutting emissions. As recently as 2021, at least 28 gigawatts of offshore wind power projects were in the development or planning pipeline.

    With the Trump order, I believe the U.S. will have, optimistically, less than 5 gigawatts in operation by 2030.

    That level of offshore wind is certainly not enough to create a viable manufacturing supply chain, provide lasting jobs or deliver the clean energy that the grid requires. In comparison, Europe’s offshore wind capacity in 2023 was 34 gigawatts, up from 5 gigawatts in 2012, and China’s is now at 34 gigawatts.

    What the states stand to lose

    Offshore wind is already a proven and operating renewable power source, not an untested technology. Denmark has been receiving power from offshore wind farms since the 1990s.

    The lost opportunity to the coastal U.S. states is significant in multiple areas.

    Trump’s order adds deep uncertainty in a developing market. Delays are likely to raise project costs for both future and existing projects, which face an environment of volatile interest rates and tariffs that can raise turbine component costs. It is energy consumers who ultimately pay through their utility bills when resource costs rise.

    The potential losses to states can run deeper. The energy company Ørsted had estimated in early 2024 that its proposed Starboard Offshore Wind project would bring Connecticut nearly US$420 million in direct investment and spending, along with employment equivalent to 800 full-time positions and improved energy system reliability.

    Massachusetts created an Offshore Wind Energy Investment Trust Fund to support redevelopment projects, including corporate tax credits up to $35 million. A company planning to build a high-voltage cable manufacturing facility there pulled out in January 2025 over the shift in support for offshore wind power. On top of that, power grid upgrades to bring offshore wind energy inland – critical to reliability for reducing greenhouse gas emissions from electricity – will be deferred.

    Atlantic Coast wind-energy leases as of July 2024. Others wind energy lease areas are in the Gulf of Mexico, off the Pacific coast and off Hawaii.
    U.S. Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement

    Technology innovation in offshore wind will also likely move abroad, as Maine experienced in 2013 after the state’s Republican governor tried to void a contract with Statoil. The Norwegian company, now known as Equinor, shifted its plans for the world’s first commercial-scale floating wind farm from Maine to Scotland and Scandinavia.

    Sand in the gears of a complex process

    Development of energy projects, whether fossil or renewable, is extremely complex, involving multiple actors in the public and private spheres. Uncertainty anywhere along the regulatory chain raises costs.

    In the U.S., jurisdiction over energy projects often involves both state and federal decision-makers that interact in a complex dance of permitting, studies, legal regulations, community engagement and finance. At each stage in this process, a critical set of decisions determines whether projects will move forward.

    The federal government, through the Department of Interior’s Bureau of Offshore Energy Management, plays an initial role in identifying, auctioning and permitting the offshore wind areas located in federal waters. States then issue requests for proposals from companies wishing to sell wind power to the grid. Developers who win bureau auctions are eligible to respond. But these agreements are only the beginning. Developers need approval for site, design and construction plans, and several state and federal environmental and regulatory permits are required before the project can begin construction.

    Trump targeted these critical points in the chain with his indefinite but “temporary” withdrawal of any offshore wind tracts for new leases and a review of any permits still required from federal agencies.

    Jobs and opportunity delayed

    A thriving offshore wind industry has the potential to bring jobs, as well as energy and economic growth. In addition to short-term construction, estimates for supply chain jobs range from 12,300 to 49,000 workers annually for subassemblies, parts and materials. The industry needs cables and steel, as well as the turbine parts and blades. It requires jobs in shipping and the movement of cargo.

    To deliver offshore wind power to the onshore grid will also require grid upgrades, which in turn would improve reliability and promote the growth of other technologies, including batteries.

    The U.S. has offshore wind farms operating off Virginia, Rhode Island and New York. Three more are under construction.
    AP Photo/Steve Helber

    Taken all together, an offshore wind energy transition would build over time. Costs would come down as domestic manufacturing took hold, and clean power would grow.

    While environmental goals drove initial investments in clean energy, the positive benefits of jobs, technology and infrastructure all became important drivers of offshore wind for the states. Tax incentives, including from the Inflation Reduction Act, now in doubt, have supported the initial financing for projects and helped to lower costs.

    It’s a long-term investment, but once clear of the regulatory processes, with infrastructure built out and manufacturing in place, the U.S. offshore wind industry would be able to grow more price competitive over time, and states would be able to meet their long-term goals.

    The Trump order creates uncertainty, delays and likely higher costs in the future.

    Barbara Kates-Garnick receives funding as an Outside Director for Anbaric Transmission, which has no operating projects related to offshore wind. She has received funding for a research project through Tufts University jointly funded by NOWRDC and the Massachusetts Clean Energy Center. She serves on the board of several nonprofits that are not politically active organizations.

    ref. Trump’s offshore wind energy freeze: What states lose if the executive order remains in place – https://theconversation.com/trumps-offshore-wind-energy-freeze-what-states-lose-if-the-executive-order-remains-in-place-249125

    MIL OSI – Global Reports

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Reviewed supervisors overall applied the EBA’s recommendations on tax integrity and dividend arbitrage trading schemes, the EBA Report finds.

    Source: European Banking Authority

    The European Banking Authority (EBA) today published a Peer Review assessing the effectiveness and degree of supervisory convergence of issues relating to tax integrity and dividend arbitrage trading schemes following the implementation of its 2020 Action plan on dividend arbitrage trading schemes. The action plan aimed to clarify that supervisors, while not responsible for investigating tax crimes, have responsibility for ensuring that financial institutions have systems and controls in place to manage tax crime risks.

    The Peer Review found that most of the reviewed supervisors largely or fully applied the benchmarks assessed and, overall, supervised these areas adequately.  This indicates that the EBA’s action plan has been effective in strengthening supervision in this area.

    The Peer Review sampled six national prudential authorities and supervisors on anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT) to see how they integrated tax integrity into their risk-based supervisory work. It considered tax integrity issues broadly, not just dividend arbitrage trading schemes (such as cum-cum or cum-ex schemes), as these vary across jurisdictions.

    The Peer Review focuses on the responsibilities assigned to AML/CFT and prudential supervisors, mainly to ensure that financial institutions have systems and controls in place to manage tax crime risks.  The Report does not look at or comment on the effectiveness of the national frameworks in place to identify or investigate tax crimes which are beyond the responsibility of AML/CFT and prudential supervisors.

    The Report sets out its findings based on four benchmarks:

    •            the effectiveness of integration of tax integrity into risk-based AML/CFT supervisory work on credit and financial institutions;

    •            the effectiveness of integration of tax integrity into sectoral and institution-specific ML/TF risk assessments;

    •            the effectiveness of arrangements for reviewing the due consideration of tax integrity in institutions’ internal governance arrangements;

    •            the effectiveness of consideration of tax integrity in the assessment of the reputation, honesty and integrity of members of the management body and key function holders.

    The EBA identified general and individual follow-up measures, which will help further build consistency and effectiveness in supervisory outcomes across the EU and to limit the financial system’s exposure to illegal tax schemes and other tax evasion.

    Legal basis and background

    Article 30 of the EBA Founding Regulation requires the EBA to periodically conduct peer reviews of some or all of the activities of competent authorities within its remit, to further strengthen consistency and effectiveness in supervisory outcomes. Peer reviews identify follow-up measures to achieve this, together with best practices seen in competent authorities. After two years, the EBA is required to assess the adequacy and effectiveness of actions taken by competent authorities in response to the follow-up measures.

    The Peer Review has been performed by an ad hoc Peer Review Committee made up of EBA and competent authorities’ staff in accordance with the EBA peer review work plan for 2023-2024 and following the process in Article 30 of the EBA Regulation and EBA peer review methodology.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI: WeFi Launches Deobank — the World’s First Decentralized Onchain Bank

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    CHARLESTOWN, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Feb. 06, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) —

    WeFi, a Web3 financial ecosystem, announces the launch of its deobank — the first Decentralized Onchain Bank aimed to remove the boundaries between physical payments and the DeFi world. Planning to draw from WeChain’s decentralized ZK Payment Engine capabilities and relying on AI-assisted simplified compliance procedures and AI agents, WeFi’s deobank is committed to channeling innovation into the financial sphere and offering banking services to everyone, including previously disadvantaged populations.

    Unlike the existing neobanks, deobanks as a new category of financial services providers will offer their clients full control over their deposited funds through non-custodial wallets. In the current unstable regulatory environment, account freezes and withdrawal limitations are increasingly becoming the norm, meaning that users frequently lose flexibility in managing their funds or access to their custodial wallets.

    WeFi’s deobank breaks with perpetuating legacy TradFi flaws, fully committed to catering to people who would like but cannot participate in the global financial system. Leaving excessively stringent account opening criteria in the past, deobanks will adapt their regulatory stance to comply where it is needed while leveraging its technology to simplify and streamline KYCs thanks to AI.

    Operating entirely on blockchain, WeFi’s deobank will bypass the outdated banking infrastructure by limiting its ties to traditional financial institutions. Removing intermediaries entirely, WeFi’s deobank creates greater security, reduced operating costs, and enhanced transparency — all while offering better flexibility to adapt to the constantly evolving global or local regulatory environment. Preserving access to fiat money on ramps and off ramps, deobanks as a vertical will mainly rely on stablecoins, making transaction confirmations fast, secure, low-cost, and border-independent.

    WeFi’s deobank plans to adapt to the increasing demands for customers’ flexibility. The modern consumer culture relies on phones, and very few people actually need a plastic card in the times when most payments can be made through Apple Pay and Google Pay.

    “This is not just a new product — it’s a new paradigm in digital banking,” comments Maksym Sakharov, Co-Founder and Group CEO at WeFi. “The rise of neobanks has transformed the way we think about opening a bank account, transferring money, dealing with cross-border payments and exchange rates. But neobanks dropped the ball way too early — and WeFi is here to pick it up. By removing an additional layer of the TradFi limitations, we will be able to make banking more convenient, accessible, and all-encompassing than ever before.”

    Discarding the low APR interest rates for traditional bank deposits and savings accounts, WeFi will offer its customers an opportunity to build meaningful wealth generation through DeFi and Web3 services. Individualized AI agents will adapt to the user’s personal risk aversion profile and preferred investment opportunities, offering advice in navigating the crypto sphere, helping execute trades, and boosting earnings. By purchasing the ITO node, contributors will be able to participate in token minting and offer their computational capacities for network validation and functioning. Shortly after its launch, the product will include options like staking, and participation in liquid pools with more variability to follow with the expansion of the WeFi ecosystem.

    The platform also plans to integrate WeFi’s native token, WFI, rewarding its users for participation in the ecosystem’s decision-making process with fee rebates, higher spending limits on cards, and more.

    About WeFi
    WeFi is the world’s first Deobank – Decentralized Onchain Bank. It leverages Blockchain Technology to simplify DeFi experience while keeping it fast, secure and efficient. On top of all the traditional financial services like virtual cards, loans and asset transfer, WeFi proposes non-custodial accounts and stablecoin earnings powered by AI Agents.

    More information can be found here: WebsiteX

    Contact

    WeFi
    press@wefi.co

    A photo accompanying this announcement is available at https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/8d029ec5-2e37-4c96-9229-dfb4ad8eb73b

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI Russia: Financial news: The Bank of Russia has excluded information about the Microcredit Company “Entertaining Finances” from the state register (06.02.2025)

    Translartion. Region: Russians Fedetion –

    Source: Central Bank of Russia –

    The Bank of Russia has excluded information about the Limited Liability Company Microcredit Company “Entertaining Finances” (hereinafter referred to as LLC MCC “Entertaining Finances”, MCC, microcredit company) from the state register of microfinance organizations (register entry number No. 2203045009908).

    The Bank of Russia adopted this solution in accordance with paragraph 1 of part 1.1 of article 7 and paragraph 8 of part 4 of article 14 of Federal Law No. 151-FZ1, based on the fact that the microcredit company violated federal laws, including in the field of consumer lending, as well as regulatory acts of the Bank of Russia, in connection with which the regulator has repeatedly applied supervisory measures to the MCC over the past 12 months.

    During 2024, LLC MCC “Entertaining Finances” submitted false reporting data to the Bank of Russia, in particular, it understated the calculated value of the maximum debt burden (MDB) for borrowers. In addition, the MCC provided consumer loans to borrowers at rates exceeding the maximum permissible amount, charged increased penalties (fines, penalties) on overdue loans, and also imposed additional services when issuing loans.

    The understatement of the DTI allowed the microcredit company to issue loans to over-indebted citizens. The share of such loans issued was one of the highest in OOO MCC “Entertaining Finances” among the participants of the microfinance market.

     

    1 Federal Law of 02.07.2010 No. 151-FZ “On microfinance activities and microfinance organizations”.

    When using the material, a link to the Press Service of the Bank of Russia is required.

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    Please Note; This Information is Raw Content Directly from the Information Source. It is access to What the Source Is Stating and Does Not Reflect

    HTTPS: //VVV.KBR.ru/Press/PR/? File = 638744311296666060MICROFINANCE. CHTM

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI: First National Corporation Reports Fourth Quarter and Annual 2024 Financial Results

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    STRASBURG, Va., Feb. 06, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — First National Corporation (the “Company” or “First National”) (NASDAQ: FXNC), the bank holding company of First Bank (the “Bank”), reported an unaudited consolidated net loss of $933 thousand and basic and diluted loss per common share of $0.10 for the fourth quarter of 2024, and adjusted operating earnings(1) of $6.0 million and adjusted operating basic and diluted earnings(1) per common share of $0.66 for the fourth quarter of 2024.

    For the year ended December 31, 2024, the Company reported unaudited consolidated earnings of $7.0 million and basic and diluted earnings per common share of $1.00 and adjusted operating earnings(1) of $14.6 million and adjusted basic and diluted earnings per common share(1) of $2.10 for the year ended December 31, 2024.

    “2024 was a transformational year for First National as we consummated our largest acquisition to date and resulting partnership with Touchstone Bankshares. Our results for the quarter reflected solid operating metrics adjusting for merger costs, and is the first quarter to include the combined financial results of First National and Touchstone,” said Scott Harvard, President and Chief Executive Officer of First National. “I am proud of all the work from our teammates to get us to this point. We are completing system conversions in several weeks which will allow us to operate as one bank across our footprint. We believe the fourth quarter financial operating performance is indicative of the benefits of the acquisition and look forward to fully completing the integration of our two companies.”

    FOURTH QUARTER HIGHLIGHTS

    • Completed acquisition of Touchstone Bankshares, Inc. on October 1
    • Total assets of $2.0 billion with 33 branch offices
    • Net interest margin increased 40 basis points to 3.83%
    • Noninterest bearing deposits comprised 29% of total deposits
    • Efficiency ratio of 63.97%(1)

    Merger with Touchstone Bankshares, Inc. (Touchstone)

    On October 1, 2024, the Company completed its acquisition of Touchstone. Touchstone’s results of operations are included in the Company’s consolidated results since the date of acquisition, and, therefore, the Company’s fourth quarter and full year 2024 results reflect increased levels of average balances, net interest income, and expense compared to its prior quarter and full year 2023 results. After purchase accounting fair value adjustments, the acquisition added $664.3 million of total assets, including $479.3 million of loans held for investment (“LHFI”), and $614.6 million of total liabilities, including $555.4 million in total deposits. The Company recorded a preliminary bargain purchase gain of $2.9 million during the quarter associated with the acquisition.

    In connection with the acquisition, the Company recorded an allowance for credit losses on acquired loans that experienced a more than insignificant amount of credit deterioration since origination (“PCD” loans) of $385 thousand. In addition, the Company recorded a provision for credit losses of $3.8 million on non-PCD loans and $100 thousand provision on unfunded commitments for the fourth quarter of 2024.

    The Company incurred pre-tax merger costs of approximately $7.3 million during the fourth quarter of 2024 related to the Touchstone acquisition.

    NET INTEREST INCOME

    For the fourth quarter of 2024, net interest income was $18.4 million, an increase of $6.6 million from $11.7 million in the third quarter of 2024. The increases in net interest income was primarily the result of a $545.3 million increase in average interest earning assets, partially offset by a $415.0 million increase in average interest bearing liabilities, in each case primarily related to the acquisition of Touchstone. For the fourth quarter of 2024, the Company’s net interest margin increased 40 basis points to 3.83% primarily due to the impacts associated with the Touchstone acquisition. Earning asset yields for the fourth quarter of 2024 increased 22 basis points to 5.30% compared to the third quarter of 2024, and the cost of funds decreased by 21 basis points to 1.51%, due to changes in deposit mix following the acquisition of Touchstone and federal funds rate cuts in late 2024.

    The Company’s net interest margin (FTE)(1) for the fourth quarter of 2024 includes the impact of acquisition accounting fair value adjustments. Net accretion income related to acquisition accounting was $408 thousand, or a nine basis point incremental increase to the net interest margin for the fourth quarter ended December 31, 2024, and none for the comparative prior quarter and same quarter in 2023, respectively, due to the Touchstone acquisition. 

    NONINTEREST INCOME

    Noninterest income increased $3.4 million to $6.4 million for the fourth quarter of 2024 from $3.2 million in the prior quarter, primarily driven by $2.9 million of pre-tax bargain purchase gain and other increases in noninterest income associated with the full quarter impact of the Touchstone acquisition that closed on October 1, 2024.

    NONINTEREST EXPENSE

    Noninterest expense increased $11.5 million to $21.9 million for the fourth quarter of 2024 from $10.5 million in the prior quarter, primarily driven by a $7.3 million increase in pre-tax merger-related expenses, as well as other increases in noninterest expense due to the full quarter impact of the Touchstone acquisition. The full quarter impact of Touchstone and related merger expenses drove the majority of the $4.5 million increase in salaries and benefits, the $3.9 million increase in data processing, and the $351 thousand increase in occupancy expenses compared to the prior quarter. In addition, legal and professional services increased $618 thousand, primarily due to fees associated with the merger.

    Adjusted operating noninterest expense, which excludes merger-related costs ($219 thousand in the third quarter and $7.3 million in the fourth quarter) and amortization of intangible assets ($4 thousand in the third quarter and $448 thousand in the fourth quarter), increased $3.9 million to $14.2 million for the fourth quarter of 2024 from $10.2 million in the prior quarter, primarily due to the impact of the Touchstone acquisition.

    ASSET QUALITY

    Overview

    Loans past due greater than 30 days and still accruing interest as a percentage of total loans amounted to 0.24% on December 31, 2024, compared to 0.24% on September 30, 2024, and 0.31% on December 31, 2023. Of the total past due loans still accruing interest, $365 thousand were past due 90 days or more on December 31, 2024, compared to $0 on September 30, 2024, and $524 thousand on December 31, 2023. Management classifies non-performing assets (“NPAs”) as non-accrual loans and OREO. Nonperforming assets (“NPAs”) as a percentage of total assets decreased to 0.35% on December 31, 2024, compared to 0.41% on September 30, 2024, and 0.48% one year ago on December 31, 2023. The decrease in the NPA ratio was primarily due to the effects of the Touchstone acquisition, which added LHFI of $479.3 million acquired in the transaction. Net charge-offs totaled $1.3 million in the fourth quarter of 2024, compared to net charge-offs of $1.6 million in the third quarter of 2024, and net charge-offs of $2.7 million in the fourth quarter of 2023. The net charge-offs for the fourth quarter of 2024 included $883 thousand of commercial and industrial loans, with $774 thousand of that specific to our pool of loans originated to health care professionals through a third-party lender. The allowance for credit losses on loans totaled $16.4 million, or 1.12% of total loans on December 31, 2024, compared to $12.7 million, or 1.28% of total loans on September 30, 2024, and $12.0 million, or 1.24% of total loans on December 31, 2023.

    Nonperforming Assets

    NPAs increased to $7.1 million on December 31, 2024, compared to $6.0 million on September 30, 2024, and $6.8 million on December 31, 2023, which represented 0.35%, 0.41%, and 0.48% of total assets, respectively. The increase in NPAs during the fourth quarter of 2024 resulted from the acquisition of Touchstone’s portfolio, including $1 million of additional non-accrual loans.

    Past Due Loans

    Loans past due 30-89 days and still accruing interest increased to $3.1 million, or 0.21% of total loans on December 31, 2024, compared to $2.4 million, or 0.24% of total loans on September 30, 2024, and $2.5 million, or 0.26%, of total loans on December 31, 2023. Loans past due over 90 days or more and still accruing interest on December 31, 2024, increased to $365 thousand, compared to $0 on September 30, 2024, and $524 thousand on December 31, 2023.

    Allowance for Credit Losses on Loans

    For the fourth quarter of 2024, the Company recorded a provision for credit losses of $4.8 million, compared to a provision for credit losses of $1.7 million in the prior quarter, and a provision for credit losses of $6.0 million in the fourth quarter of 2023. Included in the provision for credit losses for the fourth quarter of 2024 was a $3.8 million initial provision expense on non-PCD loans and $100 thousand on unfunded commitments, each acquired from Touchstone. As compared to the prior quarter, the decrease in provision for credit losses, outside of the initial provision expense recorded on non-PCD loans and unfunded commitments acquired from Touchstone, primarily reflects the impact of lower net charge-offs in the fourth quarter of 2024 and lower outstanding legacy loan balances. As compared to the same period in the prior year, the decrease in provision for credit losses, outside of the initial provision expense recorded on non-PCD loans and unfunded commitments acquired from Touchstone, is primarily due to higher reserves booked during the fourth quarter of 2023 due to qualitative factor adjustments related to the commercial and industrial loan pool, as well as specific reserves from identified individually evaluated loans.

    BALANCE SHEET

    At December 31, 2024, the Company’s consolidated balance sheet includes the impact of the Touchstone acquisition, which closed October 1, 2024, as discussed above. ASC 805, Business Combinations, allows for a measurement period of 12 months beyond the acquisition date to finalize the fair value measurements of the acquired Company’s net assets as additional information not existing as of the acquisition date becomes available. Any future measurement period adjustments will be recorded through an adjustment to the bargain purchase gain upon identification. Below is a summary of the related impact of the acquisition on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet as of the acquisition date.

    • The fair value of assets acquired totaled $664.3 million and included total loans of $479.3 million with an initial loan discount of $13.5 million.
    • The fair value of the liabilities assumed totaled $614.6 million and included total deposits of $555.4 million with an initial deposit mark related to time deposits of $1.1 million.
    • Core deposit intangibles and other intangibles acquired totaled $15.6 million.
    • No goodwill was recorded in the transaction, and the preliminary bargain purchase gain (included in other income) totaled $2.9 million.

    At December 31, 2024, total assets were $2.0 billion, an increase of $559.6 million or 38.6% from September 30, 2024 and $591.0 million or approximately 41.6% from December 31, 2023. The increases in total assets from the prior quarter and prior year were primarily driven by growth in loans held for investment (LHFI) (net of deferred fees and costs) and the securities portfolio, primarily due to the Touchstone acquisition.

    At December 31, 2024, LHFI net of allowance totaled $1.5 billion, an increase of $468.6 million from $982.0 million at September 30, 2024, and an increase of $493.1 million or 51.5% from December 31, 2023. LHFI increased from the prior quarter and prior year primarily due to the Touchstone acquisition, as well as organic loan growth compared to prior year.

    At December 31, 2024, total investments were $277.3 million, an increase of $7.8 million from September 30, 2024, and a decrease of $25.9 million or 8.5% from December 31, 2023. Available for sale (AFS) securities totaled $163.8 million at December 31, 2024 and $146.0 million at September 30, 2024 and $152.9 million at December 31, 2023. The increases compared to the prior quarter and prior year were primarily due to the acquisition of Touchstone. Total net unrealized losses on the AFS securities portfolio were $22.1 million at December 31, 2024, compared to $17.2 million at September 30, 2024, and $20.6 million at December 31, 2023. Held to maturity securities are carried at cost and totaled $109.7 million at December 31, 2024, $121.4 million at September 30, 2024, and $148.2 million at December 31, 2023.

    At December 31, 2024, total deposits were $1.80 billion, an increase of $550.5 million from the prior quarter, and an increase of $570.1 million or 46.2% from December 31, 2023. The increases in deposit balances from the prior quarter and prior year are primarily due to increases in interest bearing customer deposits and demand deposits, primarily related to the addition of the Touchstone acquired deposits.

    Other borrowings decreased $50.0 million during the fourth quarter as the Bank repaid borrowed funds from the Federal Reserve Bank through their Bank Term Funding Program.

    Shareholders’ equity totaled $166.5 million on December 31, 2024, which was an increase of $41.4 million from September 30, 2024. The increase in total shareholders’ equity was primarily attributable to the issuance of 2.67 million shares associated with the Touchstone acquisition. The Company declared and paid cash dividends of $0.155 per common share during the fourth quarter of 2024, up from $0.15 paid during the first three quarterly periods of 2024.

    The following table provides capital ratios at the periods ended:

        Dec 31, 2024     Sept 30, 2024     Dec 31, 2023  
    Total capital ratio (2)     12.35 %     14.29 %     14.13 %
    Tier 1 capital ratio (2)     11.19 %     13.04 %     12.88 %
    Common equity Tier 1 capital ratio (2)     11.19 %     13.04 %     12.88 %
    Leverage ratio (2)     7.95 %     9.23 %     9.17 %
    Common equity to total assets (3)     8.29 %     8.62 %     8.23 %
    Tangible common equity to tangible assets (1) (3)     7.46 %     8.43 %     8.03 %
       
    (1) These are financial measures not calculated in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). For a reconciliation of these non-GAAP financial measures, see the “Non-GAAP Reconciliation” sections of the Performance Summary tables included in this release.
       
    (2) All ratios at December 31, 2024 are estimates and subject to change pending the Company’s filing of its FR Y9-C. All other periods are presented as filed.
       
    (3) Capital ratios presented are for First National Corporation.
       

    NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES

    In addition to financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), the Company uses certain non-GAAP financial measures that provide useful information for financial and operational decision making, evaluating trends, and comparing financial results to other financial institutions. The non-GAAP financial measures presented in this document include adjusted operating net income, adjusted basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share, adjusted return on average assets, adjusted return on average equity, pre-provision pre-tax earnings, adjusted pre-provision pre-tax earnings, fully taxable equivalent interest income, the net interest margin, the efficiency ratio, tangible book value per share, and tangible common equity to tangible assets.

    The Company believes certain non-GAAP financial measures enhance the understanding of its business and performance. Non-GAAP financial measures are supplemental and not a substitute for, or more important than, financial measures prepared in accordance with GAAP and may not be comparable to those reported by other financial institutions. A reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure is included at the end of this release.

    ABOUT FIRST NATIONAL CORPORATION

    First National Corporation (NASDAQ: FXNC) is the parent company and bank holding company of First Bank, a community bank that first opened for business in 1907 in Strasburg, Virginia. The Bank offers loan and deposit products and services through its website, www.fbvirginia.com, its mobile banking platform, a network of ATMs located throughout its market area, a loan production office, a customer service center in a retirement community, and thirty-three bank branch office locations located throughout the Shenandoah Valley, the south-central regions of Virginia, the Roanoke Valley, the Richmond MSA, and in northern North Carolina. In addition to providing traditional banking services, the Bank operates a wealth management division under the name First Bank Wealth Management. First Bank also owns First Bank Financial Services, Inc., which owns an interest in an entity that provides title insurance services.

    FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

    Certain information contained in this discussion may include “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These forward-looking statements relate to the Company’s plans, objectives, expectations and intentions and other statements that are not historical facts, and other statements identified by words such as “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “intends,” “plans,” “targets,” and “projects,” as well as similar expression. Although the Company believes that its expectations with respect to the forward-looking statements are based upon reliable assumptions within the bounds of its knowledge of its business and operations, there can be no assurance that actual results, performance, or achievements will not differ materially from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties. For details on factors that could affect expectations, future events, or results, see the risk factors and other cautionary language included in First National’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023, and most recent Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).

    Additional risks and uncertainties may include, but are not limited to: (1) the risk that the cost savings and any revenue synergies from the Touchstone merger may not be realized or take longer than anticipated to be realized, including due to the state of the economy or other competitive factors in the areas in which the parties operate, (2) disruption from the merger of customer, supplier, employee or other business partner relationships, including diversion of management’s attention from ongoing business operations and opportunities due to the merger, (3) the possibility that the costs, fees, expenses and charges related to the merger may be greater than anticipated, (4) reputational risk and the reaction of each of the parties’ customers, suppliers, employees or other business partners to the merger, (5) the risks relating to the integration of Touchstone’s operations into the operations of First National, including the risk that such integration will be materially delayed or will be more costly or difficult than expected, (6) the risk of expansion into new geographic or product markets, (7) the dilution caused by First National’s issuance of additional shares of its common stock in the merger, and (8) general competitive, economic, political and market conditions. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements concerning First National or any person acting on its behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements above. First National does not undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect circumstances or events that occur after the date the forward-looking statements are made.

    CONTACTS

    Scott C. Harvard   Bruce E. Thomas
    President and CEO   Senior Vice President and Interim CFO
    (540) 465-9121   (540) 465-9121
    sharvard@fbvirginia.com   bthomas@fbvirginia.com
         

    FIRST NATIONAL CORPORATION
    Performance Summary
    (in thousands, except share and per share data)

    (unaudited)                                        
        For the Three Months Ended     For the Year Ended  
        Dec 31, 2024     Sept 30, 2024     Dec 31, 2023     Dec 31, 2024     Dec 31, 2023  
    Income Statement                                        
    Interest and dividend income                                        
    Interest and fees on loans   $ 21,516     $ 14,479     $ 13,255     $ 63,483     $ 49,293  
    Interest on deposits in banks     2,085       1,538       368       6,490       1,809  
    Interest on federal funds sold     189                   189        
    Interest on securities                                        
    Taxable interest on securities     1,284       1,091       1,318       4,733       5,286  
    Tax-exempt interest on securities     308       303       303       1,222       1,220  
    Dividends     104       33       30       202       111  
    Total interest and dividend income   $ 25,486     $ 17,444     $ 15,274     $ 76,319     $ 57,719  
    Interest expense                                        
    Interest on deposits   $ 6,415     $ 4,958     $ 4,232     $ 20,964     $ 13,660  
    Interest on federal funds purchased     1             1       1       1  
    Interest on subordinated debt     396       69       70       603       277  
    Interest on junior subordinated debt     68       68       68       270       271  
    Interest on other borrowings     247       600       94       2,029       97  
    Total interest expense   $ 7,127     $ 5,695     $ 4,465     $ 23,867     $ 14,306  
    Net interest income   $ 18,359     $ 11,749     $ 10,809     $ 52,452     $ 43,413  
    Provision for credit losses     4,750       1,700       5,950       7,850       6,150  
    Net interest income after provision for credit losses   $ 13,609     $ 10,049     $ 4,859     $ 44,602     $ 37,263  
    Noninterest income                                        
    Service charges on deposit accounts   $ 1,181     $ 675     $ 718     $ 3,122     $ 2,780  
    ATM and check card fees     792       934       825       3,305       3,449  
    Wealth management fees     903       952       784       3,617       3,120  
    Fees for other customer services     317       276       232       966       770  
    Brokered mortgage fees     90       92       46       252       119  
    Income from bank owned life insurance     264       191       168       755       627  
    Net gains (losses) on securities available for sale     (154 )     39             (115 )      
    Gain on sale of other investment                 186             186  
    Net gains on disposal of premises and equipment                             47  
    Bargain purchase gain     2,920                   2,920        
    Other operating income     131       44       110       1,558       686  
    Total noninterest income   $ 6,444     $ 3,203     $ 3,069     $ 16,380     $ 11,784  
    Noninterest expense                                        
    Salaries and employee benefits   $ 10,439     $ 5,927     $ 4,999     $ 28,076     $ 21,039  
    Occupancy     936       585       568       2,604       2,154  
    Equipment     1,123       726       621       3,131       2,377  
    Marketing     371       262       190       1,101       910  
    Supplies     264       123       153       618       576  
    Legal and professional fees     1,214       596       443       3,386       1,647  
    ATM and check card expense     385       394       313       1,508       1,578  
    FDIC assessment     285       195       154       860       633  
    Bank franchise tax     262       262       262       1,047       1,040  
    Data processing expense     4,142       290       327       4,841       1,047  
    Amortization expense     448       4       4       461       18  
    Other real estate owned expense (income), net     5       10       2       15       (199 )
    Net losses on disposal of premises and equipment     (4 )     2             47        
    Other operating expense     2,059       1,083       1,064       5,239       4,422  
    Total noninterest expense   $ 21,929     $ 10,459     $ 9,100     $ 52,934     $ 37,242  
    Income (loss) before income taxes   $ (1,876 )   $ 2,793     $ (1,172 )   $ 8,048     $ 11,805  
    Income tax expense (benefit)     (943 )     545       (321 )     1,082       2,181  
    Net income (loss)   $ (933 )   $ 2,248     $ (851 )   $ 6,966     $ 9,624  
                                             

    FIRST NATIONAL CORPORATION
    Performance Summary
    (in thousands, except share and per share data)

    (unaudited)                                        
        As of or For the Three Months Ended     As of or For the Year Ended  
        Dec 31, 2024     Sept 30, 2024     Dec 31, 2023     Dec 31, 2024     Dec 31, 2023  
    Common Share and Per Common Share Data                                        
    Earnings (loss) per common share, basic   $ (0.10 )   $ 0.36     $ (0.14 )   $ 1.00     $ 1.54  
    Adjusted earnings (loss) per common share, basic(1)   $ 0.66       0.39       (0.14 )   $ 2.10     $ 1.54  
    Weighted average shares, basic     8,971,649       6,287,997       6,261,500       6,955,592       6,265,394  
    Earnings (loss) per common share, diluted   $ (0.10 )   $ 0.36     $ (0.14 )   $ 1.00     $ 1.53  
    Adjusted earnings (loss) per common share, diluted(1)   $ 0.66       0.39       (0.14 )   $ 2.10     $ 1.53  
    Weighted average shares, diluted     8,994,315       6,303,282       6,282,815       6,971,089       6,279,106  
    Shares outstanding at period end     8,974,102       6,296,705       6,263,102       8,974,102       6,263,102  
    Tangible book value per share at period end (1)   $ 16.55     $ 19.37     $ 18.06     $ 16.55     $ 18.06  
    Cash dividends   $ 0.155     $ 0.150     $ 0.150     $ 0.605     $ 0.600  
                                             
    Key Performance Ratios                                        
    Return on average assets     (0.18 %)     0.62 %     (0.25 %)     0.44 %     0.71 %
    Adjusted return on average assets (1)     1.15 %     0.67 %     (0.25 %)     0.92 %     0.71 %
    Return on average equity     (2.35 %)     7.28 %     (2.97 %)     5.33 %     8.59 %
    Adjusted return on average equity (1)     15.01 %     7.93 %     (2.97 %)     11.19 %     8.59 %
    Net interest margin (1)     3.83 %     3.43 %     3.35 %     3.51 %     3.41 %
    Efficiency ratio (1)     63.97 %     68.13 %     66.26 %     66.73 %     67.69 %
                                             
    Average Balances                                        
    Average assets   $ 2,051,578     $ 1,449,185     $ 1,372,365     $ 1,597,150     $ 1,363,339  
    Average earning assets     1,919,864       1,374,566       1,290,231       1,504,946       1,280,980  
    Average shareholders’ equity     157,844       122,802       113,614       130,715       112,083  
                                             
    Asset Quality                                        
    Loan charge-offs   $ 1,432     $ 1,667     $ 2,765     $ 4,033     $ 3,993  
    Loan recoveries     98       95       92       283       418  
    Net charge-offs     1,334       1,572       2,673       3,750       3,575  
    Non-accrual loans     7,058       5,929       6,763       7,058       6,763  
    Other real estate owned, net     53       56             53        
    Nonperforming assets (3)     7,111       5,985       6,763       7,111       6,763  
    Loans 30 to 89 days past due, accruing     3,085       2,358       2,484       3,085       2,484  
    Loans over 90 days past due, accruing     365             524       365       524  
    Special mention loans     7,043       516             7,043        
    Substandard loans, accruing     2,030       1,713       287       2,030       287  
                                             
    Capital Ratios (2)                                        
    Total capital   $ 181,449     $ 148,477     $ 142,333     $ 181,449     $ 142,333  
    Tier 1 capital     164,454       135,490       129,840       164,454       129,840  
    Common equity Tier 1 capital     164,454       135,490       129,840       164,454       129,840  
    Total capital to risk-weighted assets     12.35 %     14.29 %     14.05 %     12.35 %     14.05 %
    Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets     11.19 %     13.04 %     12.82 %     11.19 %     12.82 %
    Common equity Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets     11.19 %     13.04 %     12.82 %     11.19 %     12.82 %
    Leverage ratio     7.95 %     9.23 %     9.31 %     7.95 %     9.31 %
                                             

    FIRST NATIONAL CORPORATION
    Performance Summary
    (in thousands, except share and per share data)

    (unaudited)                                        
        For the Period Ended  
        Dec 31, 2024     Sept 30, 2024     Jun 30, 2024     Mar 31, 2024     Dec 31, 2023  
    Balance Sheet                                        
    Cash and due from banks   $ 24,916     $ 18,197     $ 16,729     $ 14,476     $ 17,194  
    Interest-bearing deposits in banks     137,958       108,319       118,906       124,232       69,967  
    Cash and cash equivalents   $ 162,874     $ 126,516     $ 135,635     $ 138,708     $ 87,161  
    Securities available for sale, at fair value     163,847       146,013       144,816       147,675       152,857  
    Securities held to maturity, at amortized cost (net of allowance for credit losses)     109,741       121,425       123,497       125,825       148,244  
    Restricted securities, at cost     3,741       2,112       2,112       2,112       2,078  
    Loans, net of allowance for credit losses     1,450,604       982,016       977,423       960,371       957,456  
    Other real estate owned, net     53       56                    
    Premises and equipment, net     34,824       22,960       22,205       21,993       22,142  
    Accrued interest receivable     6,020       4,794       4,916       4,978       4,655  
    Bank owned life insurance     37,873       24,992       24,802       24,652       24,902  
    Goodwill     3,030       3,030       3,030       3,030       3,030  
    Core deposit intangibles, net     14,986       104       108       113       117  
    Other assets     22,688       16,698       18,984       17,738       16,653  
    Total assets   $ 2,010,281     $ 1,450,716     $ 1,457,528     $ 1,447,195     $ 1,419,295  
                                             
    Noninterest-bearing demand deposits   $ 520,153     $ 383,400     $ 397,770     $ 384,092     $ 379,208  
    Savings and interest-bearing demand deposits     924,880       663,925       665,208       677,458       662,169  
    Time deposits     358,745       205,930       202,818       197,587       192,349  
    Total deposits   $ 1,803,778     $ 1,253,255     $ 1,265,796     $ 1,259,137     $ 1,233,726  
    Other borrowings           50,000       50,000       50,000       50,000  
    Subordinated debt, net     21,176       4,999       4,998       4,998       4,997  
    Junior subordinated debt     9,279       9,279       9,279       9,279       9,279  
    Accrued interest payable and other liabilities     9,517       8,068       7,564       5,965       5,022  
    Total liabilities   $ 1,843,750     $ 1,325,601     $ 1,337,637     $ 1,329,379     $ 1,303,024  
                                             
    Preferred stock   $     $     $     $     $  
    Common stock     11,218       7,871       7,851       7,847       7,829  
    Surplus     77,058       33,409       33,116       33,021       32,950  
    Retained earnings     96,947       99,270       97,966       96,465       94,198  
    Accumulated other comprehensive (loss), net     (18,692 )     (15,435 )     (19,042 )     (19,517 )     (18,706 )
    Total shareholders’ equity   $ 166,531     $ 125,115     $ 119,891     $ 117,816     $ 116,271  
    Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity   $ 2,010,281     $ 1,450,716     $ 1,457,528     $ 1,447,195     $ 1,419,295  
                                             
    Loan Data                                        
    Mortgage real estate loans:                                        
    Construction and land development   $ 84,480     $ 61,446     $ 60,919     $ 53,364     $ 52,680  
    Secured by farmland     14,133       9,099       8,911       9,079       9,154  
    Secured by 1-4 family residential     547,576       351,004       346,976       347,014       344,369  
    Other real estate loans     658,029       440,648       440,857       436,006       438,118  
    Loans to farmers (except those secured by real estate)     940       633       349       332       455  
    Commercial and industrial loans (except those secured by real estate)     140,393       114,190       115,951       113,230       112,619  
    Consumer installment loans     7,582       5,396       5,068       4,808       4,753  
    Deposit overdrafts     450       253       365       251       222  
    All other loans     13,421       12,051       10,580       8,890       7,060  
    Total loans   $ 1,467,004     $ 994,720     $ 989,976     $ 972,974     $ 969,430  
    Allowance for credit losses     (16,400 )     (12,704 )     (12,553 )     (12,603 )     (11,974 )
    Loans, net   $ 1,450,604     $ 982,016     $ 977,423     $ 960,371     $ 957,456  
                                             

    FIRST NATIONAL CORPORATION
    Non-GAAP Reconciliation
    (in thousands, except share and per share data)

    (unaudited)                              
      For the Three Months Ended   For the Year Ended  
      Dec 31, 2024   Sept 30, 2024   Dec 31, 2023   Dec 31, 2024   Dec 31, 2023  
    Operating Net Income                              
    Net income (GAAP) $ (933 ) $ 2,248   $ (851 ) $ 6,966   $ 9,624  
    Add: Merger-related expenses   7,316     219         8,107      
    Add: Day 2 Non-PCD Provision   3,931             3,931      
    Subtract: Bargain purchase gain   (2,920 )           (2,920 )    
    Subtract: Tax effect of adjustment (4)   (1,439 )   (19 )       (1,463 )    
    Adjusted operating net income (non-GAAP) $ 5,955   $ 2,448   $ (851 ) $ 14,621   $ 9,624  
                                   
    Adjusted Earnings Per Share, Basic                              
    Weighted average shares, basic   8,971,649     6,287,997     6,261,500     6,955,592     6,265,394  
    Basic earnings (loss) per share (GAAP) $ (0.10 ) $ 0.36   $ (0.14 ) $ 1.00   $ 1.54  
    Adjusted earnings (loss) per share, basic (non-GAAP) $ 0.66   $ 0.39   $ (0.14 ) $ 2.10   $ 1.54  
                                   
    Adjusted Earnings Per Share, Diluted                              
    Weighted average shares, diluted   8,994,315     6,303,282     6,282,815     6,971,089     6,279,106  
    Diluted earnings (loss) per share (GAAP) $ (0.10 ) $ 0.36   $ (0.14 ) $ 1.00   $ 1.53  
    Adjusted diluted earnings (loss) per share (non-GAAP) $ 0.66   $ 0.39   $ (0.14 ) $ 2.10   $ 1.53  
                                   
    Adjusted Pre-Provision, Pre-Tax Earnings                              
    Net interest income $ 18,359   $ 11,749   $ 10,809   $ 52,452   $ 43,413  
    Total noninterest income   6,444     3,203     3,069     16,380     11,784  
    Net revenue $ 24,803   $ 14,952   $ 13,878   $ 68,832   $ 55,197  
    Total noninterest expense   21,929     10,459     9,100     52,934     37,242  
    Pre-provision, pre-tax earnings $ 2,874   $ 4,493   $ 4,778   $ 15,898   $ 17,955  
    Add: Merger expenses   7,316     219         8,107      
    Add: Day 2 Non-PCD Provision   3,931             3,931      
    Subtract: Bargain purchase gain   (2,920 )           (2,920 )    
    Adjusted pre-provision, pre-tax, earnings $ 7,270   $ 4,712   $ 4,778   $ 21,085   $ 17,955  
                                   
    Adjusted Performance Ratios                              
    Average assets $ 2,051,578   $ 1,449,185   $ 1,372,365   $ 1,597,150   $ 1,363,339  
    Return on average assets (GAAP)   (0.18 %)   0.62 %   (0.25 %)   0.44 %   0.71 %
    Adjusted return on average assets (non-GAAP)   1.15 %   0.67 %   (0.25 %)   0.92 %   0.71 %
                                   
    Average shareholders’ equity $ 157,844   $ 122,802     113,614   $ 130,715   $ 112,083  
    Return on average equity (GAAP)   (2.35 %)   7.28 %   (2.97 %)   5.33 %   8.59 %
    Adjusted return on average equity (non-GAAP)   15.01 %   7.93 %   (2.97 %)   11.19 %   8.59 %
                                   
    Pre-provision, pre-tax return on average assets (non-GAAP)   0.56 %   1.24 %   1.39 %   1.00 %   1.32 %
    Adjusted pre-provision, pre-tax return on average assets (non-GAAP)   1.42 %   1.30 %   1.39 %   1.32 %   1.32 %
                                   
    Net Interest Margin                              
    Tax-equivalent net interest income $ 18,461   $ 11,842   $ 10,889   $ 52,821   $ 43,738  
    Average earning assets   1,919,864     1,374,566     1,290,231     1,504,946     1,280,980  
    Net interest margin (non-GAAP)   3.83 %   3.43 %   3.35 %   3.51 %   3.41 %
                                   

    FIRST NATIONAL CORPORATION
    Non-GAAP Reconciliation
    (in thousands, except share and per share data)
    (unaudited)              

     
      For the Three Months Ended   For the Year Ended  
      Dec 31, 2024   Sept 30, 2024   Dec 31, 2023   Dec 31, 2024   Dec 31, 2023  
    Efficiency Ratio                              
    Total noninterest expense (GAAP) $ 21,929   $ 10,459   $ 9,100   $ 52,934   $ 37,242  
    Add: other real estate owned income, net   (5 )   (10 )   (2 )   (15 )   199  
    Subtract: amortization of intangibles   (448 )   (4 )   (4 )   (461 )   (18 )
    Subtract: loss on disposal of premises and equipment, net   3     (2 )       (47 )    
    Subtract: merger expenses   (7,316 )   (219 )       (8,107 )    
    Adjusted non-interest expense (non-GAAP) $ 14,163   $ 10,224   $ 9,094   $ 44,304   $ 37,423  
    Tax-equivalent net interest income (non-GAAP) $ 18,461   $ 11,842   $ 10,889   $ 52,821   $ 43,738  
    Total noninterest income (GAAP)   6,444     3,203     3,069     16,380     11,784  
    (Gain) loss on disposal of premises and equipment           (47 )       (47 )
    Gain on sale of other investment           (186 )       (186 )
    Bargain purchase gain   (2,920 )           (2,920 )    
    Securities losses (gains), net   154     (39 )       115      
    Adjusted income for efficiency ratio (non-GAAP) $ 22,139   $ 15,006   $ 13,725   $ 66,396   $ 55,289  
                                   
    Efficiency ratio (non-GAAP)   63.97 %   68.13 %   66.26 %   66.73 %   67.69 %
                                   

    FIRST NATIONAL CORPORATION
    Non-GAAP Reconciliation
    (in thousands, except share and per share data)

    (unaudited)                                        
        For the Three Months Ended     For the Year Ended  
        Dec 31, 2024     Sept 30, 2024     Dec 31, 2023     Dec 31, 2024     Dec 31, 2023  
    Tax-Equivalent Net Interest Income                                        
    GAAP measures:                                        
    Interest income – loans   $ 21,516     $ 14,479     $ 13,255     $ 63,483     $ 49,293  
    Interest income – investments and other     3,970       2,965       2,019       12,836       8,426  
    Interest expense – deposits     (6,415 )     (4,958 )     (4,232 )     (20,964 )     (13,660 )
    Interest expense – federal funds purchased     (1 )                 (1 )      
    Interest expense – subordinated debt     (396 )     (69 )     (70 )     (603 )     (277 )
    Interest expense – junior subordinated debt     (68 )     (68 )     (68 )     (270 )     (271 )
    Interest expense – other borrowings     (247 )     (600 )     (95 )     (2,029 )     (98 )
    Net interest income   $ 18,359     $ 11,749     $ 10,809     $ 52,452     $ 43,413  
    Non-GAAP measures:                                        
    Add: Tax benefit realized on non-taxable interest income – loans (4)   $ 18     $ 13     $     $ 43     $  
    Add: Tax benefit realized on non-taxable interest income – municipal securities (4)     84       80       80       326       325  
    Tax benefit realized on non-taxable interest income   $ 102     $ 93     $ 80     $ 369     $ 325  
    Tax-equivalent net interest income   $ 18,461     $ 11,842     $ 10,889     $ 52,821     $ 43,738  
                                             
                                             
    Tangible Common Equity and Tangible Assets                                        
    Total assets (GAAP)   $ 2,010,281     $ 1,450,716     $ 1,419,295     $ 2,010,281     $ 1,419,295  
    Subtract: goodwill     (3,030 )     (3,030 )     (3,030 )     (3,030 )     (3,030 )
    Subtract: core deposit intangibles, net     (14,986 )     (104 )     (117 )     (14,986 )     (117 )
    Tangible assets (Non-GAAP)   $ 1,992,265     $ 1,447,582     $ 1,416,148     $ 1,992,265     $ 1,416,148  
                                             
    Total shareholders’ equity (GAAP)   $ 166,531     $ 125,115     $ 116,271     $ 166,531     $ 116,271  
    Subtract: goodwill     (3,030 )     (3,030 )     (3,030 )     (3,030 )     (3,030 )
    Subtract: core deposit intangibles, net     (14,986 )     (104 )     (117 )     (14,986 )     (117 )
    Tangible common equity (Non-GAAP)   $ 148,515     $ 121,981     $ 113,124     $ 148,515     $ 113,124  
                                             
    Tangible common equity to tangible assets ratio     7.45 %     8.43 %     7.99 %     7.45 %     7.99 %
                                             
                                             
    Tangible Book Value Per Share                                        
    Tangible common equity (non-GAAP)   $ 148,515     $ 121,981     $ 113,124     $ 148,515     $ 113,124  
    Common shares outstanding, ending     8,974,102       6,296,705       6,263,102       8,974,102       6,263,102  
    Tangible book value per share   $ 16.48     $ 19.37     $ 18.06     $ 16.48     $ 18.06  
       
    (1) Non-GAAP financial measure.  See “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” and “Non-GAAP Reconciliations” for additional information and detailed calculations of adjustments.
       
    (2) Capital ratios are for First Bank.
       
    (3) Nonperforming assets are comprised of nonaccrual loans and other real estate owned.
       
    (4) The tax rate utilized in calculating the tax benefit is 21%. Certain merger-related expenses were non-deductible.

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI Banking: Secretary-General of ASEAN has bilateral meeting with Ambassador of Chile to ASEAN

    Source: ASEAN

    Secretary-General of ASEAN, Dr. Kao Kim Hourn, today met with Ambassador of Chile to ASEAN, H.E. Mario Ignacio Artaza, at the ASEAN Headquarters/ASEAN Secretariat. They exchanged views on the ASEAN-Chile Development Partnership and ways to further substantiate cooperation, including the implementation of the ASEAN-Chile Development Partnership: Practical Cooperation Areas and Chile’s interest to accede to the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (RCEP) Agreement.

    The post Secretary-General of ASEAN has bilateral meeting with Ambassador of Chile to ASEAN appeared first on ASEAN Main Portal.

    MIL OSI Global Banks

  • MIL-OSI Banking: Secretary-General of ASEAN receives visit by EU–ASEAN Business Council delegation

    Source: ASEAN

    Secretary-General of ASEAN, Dr. Kao Kim Hourn, today received a visit by a delegation from the EU-ASEAN Business Council, who are on a business mission to Indonesia, at the ASEAN Headquarters/ASEAN Secretariat. The meeting exchanged perspectives and discussed the role of private sectors in fostering the digital economy and accelerating sustainability within the ASEAN region. They underscored the critical role of private sector innovation and investment in driving these agendas, while exploring actionable pathways to deepen cooperation between ASEAN and European stakeholders.

    The post Secretary-General of ASEAN receives visit by EU–ASEAN Business Council delegation appeared first on ASEAN Main Portal.

    MIL OSI Global Banks

  • MIL-OSI: Bitmaster Revolutionizes Crypto Trading with AI and MCS Token Integration

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    SEOUL, South Korea, Feb. 06, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Bitmaster, an advanced cryptocurrency trading platform, is transforming digital asset trading through AI-driven automation and MCS token integration. By combining real-time analytics with automated trading strategies, Bitmaster provides a more efficient, secure, and accessible trading environment for both beginners and professional traders.

    Bitmaster leverages AI-based trading signals to analyze the market and execute automated trades, allowing users to seize real-time opportunities while minimizing risks. Additionally, MCS tokens offer benefits such as reduced transaction fees, automated trading functionality, staking rewards, and access to premium trading tools, enhancing the overall user experience.

    New users can enjoy a 3-day free premium membership trial and receive 10 MCS tokens, allowing them to explore the platform’s various features. Premium features include Signal Master and Auto Master, which enhance trading precision. Signal Master provides trading signals for Bitcoin futures, supporting users with accurate trading strategies. Auto Master, which is currently under development, will enable automated trading based on Signal Master’s insights. Additionally, within the app, users can participate in the Up & Down Prediction Game, where they predict Bitcoin futures price movements (UP or DOWN). Successful predictions reward users with 1.9 times the MCS amount wagered. The 10 MCS tokens received can also be sent to LBank for trading or converted to USDT for withdrawal.

    Bitmaster is focusing on enhancing liquidity, improving market accessibility, and strengthening its presence in the global cryptocurrency ecosystem. To achieve this, the company is expanding strategic partnerships and collaborating with leading global exchanges to provide diverse fiat on-ramp options and region-specific trading solutions. Additionally, Bitmaster is increasing accessibility by offering multi-language support and localized customer service to better serve its global user base. These initiatives ensure that users can trade in a seamless and secure environment through trusted exchange partnerships.

    Bitmaster operates various user-centric incentive programs to encourage active participation and trading. MCS airdrops provide additional benefits to both new and existing users, driving engagement within the platform. This encourages continuous trading activity, allowing users to earn more rewards within the Bitmaster ecosystem. Additionally, promotional campaigns offer extra benefits, ensuring long-term user retention. Incentives such as MCS airdrops, referral programs with up to 30% commission, and ICO bonuses of up to 40% play a crucial role in increasing user engagement and supporting the platform’s sustained growth.

    Bitmaster continues to set new standards in AI-driven innovation and blockchain technology, driving automation and data-driven trading. As the platform evolves, it aims to deliver an intuitive, efficient, and rewarding trading experience for global users, solidifying its leadership in the cryptocurrency trading industry.

    For more details: https://buly.kr/Ezi4D52

    Contact Information

    Company Name: Bitmaster
    Contact Person: Evelyn
    Contact Person Title: Contents Manager
    Email: mr.mcs@bitmaster.pro
    Phone Number: +82 1039824189
    Company Website: https://bitmaster.pro/

    Disclaimer: This press release is provided by Bitmaster. The statements, views, and opinions expressed in this content are solely those of the sponsor and do not necessarily reflect the views of this media platform. We do not endorse, verify, or guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of any information presented. This content is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial, investment, or trading advice. Investing in cloud mining and related opportunities involves significant risks, including the potential loss of capital. Readers are strongly encouraged to conduct their own research and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

    Photos accompanying this announcement are available at https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/efe81893-9e0b-4e13-8c27-8d4e63bce156

    https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/3288772b-ccfb-4ab2-aff0-17d97f476168

    https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/5f212ffe-9120-4f2e-aa45-9eed813dcb99

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: MEASURES TO COMBAT TELECOM-RELATED FRAUDS

    Source: Government of India (2)

    Posted On: 06 FEB 2025 3:12PM by PIB Delhi

    Department of Telecommunications (DoT) has undertaken following measures to protect citizens and prevent misuse of telecom resources for cybercrime & financial frauds:

    1. Developed a system to detect suspected mobile connections obtained on fake / forged documents and directed Telecom Service Providers (TSPs) for reverification.

     

    1. Launched a citizen centric initiative Sanchar Saathi to empower mobile subscribers, strengthen their security and increase awareness. It is available in the form of web portal (https://sancharsaathi.gov.in) and Mobile App. Sanchar Saathi, inter-alia, facilitates citizens to:

    1. report suspected fraud and unsolicited commercial communications

    2. know the mobile connections issued in their name and report the mobile connections which are either not required or not taken by them

    3. report the stolen / lost mobile handset for blocking and tracing

    4. know the genuineness of mobile handset

     

    1. Launched Digital Intelligence Platform (DIP) for sharing of information related to misuse of telecom resources with stakeholders for prevention of cyber-crime and financial frauds. At present, 540 organization including banks and financial institutions, Reserve Bank of India (RBI), State/UT Police, Security agencies, Indian Cybercrime Coordination Centre (I4C), TSPs etc. have on-boarded the platform.

     

    1. DoT and TSPs have devised a system to identify and block incoming international spoofed calls displaying Indian mobile numbers that appear to be originating from within India. Such international spoofed calls have been made by cyber-criminals in recent cases of fake digital arrests, FedEx scams, drugs/narcotics in courier, impersonation as government and police officials, disconnections of mobile numbers by DoT/TRAI officials, etc.

     

    Further, Ministry of Home Affairs has also launched the National Cyber Crime Reporting Portal (https://cybercrime.gov.in) to enable the public to report all types of cyber crimes.

    DoT has notified Telecom Cyber Security Rules and Critical Telecommunication Infrastructure Rules on 21.11.2024 and 22.11.2024 respectively under section 22 of the telecommunications Act, 2023 for security of the telecommunication infrastructure. DoT has set up a Telecom Security Operation Centre (TSOC), for detecting potential cyber- threats to Indian telecom network and providing alerts to stakeholders for necessary actions. DoT is engaging with citizens and making them aware of telecom related frauds & scams through social media and regular press releases.

    This information was given by the Minister of State for Communications, Dr. Pemmasani Chandra Sekhar in a written reply to a question in Rajya Sabha today.

    *****

    Samrat/Dheeraj@:   pibcomm[at]gmail[dot]com

    (Release ID: 2100237) Visitor Counter : 98

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News

  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: INDIA POST PAYMENTS BANK UNDERTAKES VARIOUS MEASURES TO FACILITATE POST OFFICE SAVINGS ACCOUNT (POSA) LINKAGE WITH ITS ACCOUNTS

    Source: Government of India (2)

    Posted On: 06 FEB 2025 3:11PM by PIB Delhi

    India Post Payments Bank (IPPB) has 650 branches and over 1.63 lakh access points across the country with 01 branch and 224 access points particularly in Kushinagar district.

    IPPB is offering a range of services and products such as savings and current accounts, Virtual Debit Card, Domestic Money Transfer services, bill and utility payments, insurance services for IPPB customers, Post Office Savings Account (POSA) linkage with IPPB accounts, online payment for Post Office Savings schemes, Digital Life Certificate (DLC), Aadhaar Enabled Payment System (AePS), mobile number update in Aadhaar for any citizen and Child Enrolment services for any child of 0-5 years old.

    IPPB has undertaken various measures to facilitate the Post Office Savings Account (POSA) linkage with IPPB accounts including display of branding material at all major post offices and holding of more than 25000 financial literacy and customer awareness camps in and outside post offices to encourage customers for linking POSA – IPPB account.

    IPPB provides doorstep access to Aadhaar related services including Digital Life Certificates and Child Enrolment through the Postmen and GraminDakSevaks. It has tied up with various Departments at Central/State level to provide these services to general public, pensioners and children, as the case may be. As on 31.12.2024, the Bank has opened 7.03 crore Aadhaar seeded accounts, updated mobile numbers in Aadhaar of 7.68 crore customers, provided Child Enrolment services to 81.17 lakh customers and has issued more than 24 Lakh Digital Life Certificate to pensioners.

    This information was given by the Minister of State for Communications, Dr. Pemmasani Chandra Sekhar in a written reply to a question in Rajya Sabha today.

    *****

    Samrat/Dheeraj@:   pibcomm[at]gmail[dot]com

    (Release ID: 2100235) Visitor Counter : 89

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News

  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: DEPARTMENT OF POSTS TAKES STEPS TO IMPROVE OPERATIONAL EFFICIENCY AND EXPAND SERVICE OFFERINGS

    Source: Government of India (2)

    Posted On: 06 FEB 2025 3:08PM by PIB Delhi

    The Department of Posts has taken numerous steps to improve operational efficiency, incorporate technology, and expand service offerings. Below are the details:

    1. Improved Parcel Services:
      • Nodal Delivery Centers: 233 Nodal Delivery Centers have been established for faster and more efficient parcel delivery, covering over 1600 PIN codes. These centers handle approximately 30% of daily parcel deliveries.
      • Parcel Hubs: A network of 190 Parcel Hubs (Level-1 and Level-2) has been set up to facilitate faster processing and secure handling of parcels.
      • Technology Integration: Advanced tracking systems have been implemented, including real-time delivery status, API integration, system-assisted sorting, and error management systems.
      • Parcel Packaging Policy: 1408 Parcel Packaging Units are operational across the country, providing high-quality packaging materials for secure parcel transit.
      • Smart Booking and Delivery Kiosks: 30 Smart Parcel Delivery Kiosks and 30 Self Booking Kiosks have been installed in various cities to enable flexible pickup and delivery options for customers.
    2. DakGharNiryatKendras (DNKs): In coordination with Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC), 1013 DNKs have been established to facilitate e-commerce exports, offering services such as self-booking, label generation, and export documentation.
      • These DNKs provide valuable support to small exporters, including artisans and self-help groups from rural areas.
    3. Core Banking and Digital Services:
      • All Post Offices are integrated with a Core Banking Solution offering a variety of services including ATMs, Internet Banking, Mobile Banking, NEFT/RTGS, Electronic Clearing Services (ECS), and e-KYC for smooth digital transactions.
      • India Post Payments Bank offers digital payment services linked to Post Office Savings Accounts.
    4. Expanded Services by the Business Development Directorate:
      • Post Office Passport Seva Kendra (POPSK): Post Offices are now offering passport services to citizens across the country.
      • AadhaarEnrollment and UpdationCenters: To provide Aadhaar services even in remote areas.
      • Verification of Prime Minister Employment Generation Program (PMEGP) Units: Post Offices assist in the verification process for government subsidy schemes like PMEGP.
      • E-Post & E-Payment: These services provide electronic message transmission and bill payment collection, respectively, further enhancing the Post’s service offerings.
    5. Retail and Specialized Services:
      • Gangajal and Holy Prasadam: Post Offices are involved in the distribution of Gangajal and delivery of Prasadam, providing a unique religious service to customers.
      • Media Post and Direct Post: For business communication, Post Offices facilitate Media Post services (advertisements through postal mediums) and Direct Post for targeted advertising.
      • India Post Passenger Reservation System (IP-PRS): Identified Post Offices have been equipped to offer railway ticket reservations, thus expanding their utility to the public.

    This information was given by the Minister of State for Communications, Dr. Pemmasani Chandra Sekhar in a written reply to a question in Rajya Sabha today.

    *****

    Samrat/Dheeraj@:   pibcomm[at]gmail[dot]com

    (Release ID: 2100231) Visitor Counter : 69

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News

  • MIL-OSI Economics: Piero Cipollone: Interview with Reuters

    Source: European Central Bank

    Interview with Piero Cipollone, conducted by Balazs Koranyi and Francesco Canepa

    6 February 2025

    The ECB has said that the direction of travel for monetary policy is clear, but the timing and extent of moves is not. What does this guidance mean to you?

    We are moving towards the target. The direction of inflation is clear, despite some small bumps. All incoming information points to a convergence with the target in 2025 and this is what our models are also telling us.

    Our models include market expectations for the interest rate path, so this convergence with the inflation target is coherent with a declining interest rate path.

    Everything is of course contingent on the information at the time of the forecasts, and we will have a new forecast round in March. Before then, we’ll get another inflation print, we’ll have more details on the composition of inflation, and all these feed into the model, as do market expectations for interest rates.

    Does that mean implicitly that you are comfortable with market expectations for further rate cuts as they are embedded in the projections?

    That was conditional on the information we had in December. I am comfortable as long as that path takes us to the target in the medium term in a sustainable way.

    What does the data since that December meeting tell you?

    Overall, I think the direction is the same. I don’t see huge changes in our view, except trade tensions. The overall understanding of where we are going is there, the fundamentals haven’t changed, so I do not expect a big change in direction.

    One thing that might happen is a trade war with the United States. How would that affect your thinking?

    It depends on details such as whether we retaliate, precisely what these tariffs are going to be levied on, and how China is affected.

    If tariffs are imposed on us, the most immediate impact will be on growth.

    The price of goods will be higher in the United States. Who is going to absorb the cost? It could be that European companies, in order to defend their market share, might be willing to sacrifice a bit of their margin in order to stay in the market. We have seen this many times and European firms have a great ability to adjust. Part of this sacrifice might be recovered through the exchange rate. So, in the end, the overall impact may not be that big.

    What concerns me more is if President Trump engages in a full trade war with China. This is a more serious threat because China has 35% of the world’s manufacturing capacity. Trade barriers will force China to sell its goods elsewhere and the competition from China could be a serious threat to us. These goods showing up in Europe could have both a deflationary and a contractionary impact because they would crowd out local products.

    The uncertainty is exceptionally high, everything is in motion. And we can’t assess where it’s all going until things fall in place.

    It’s true we have a goods surplus with the United States. But if you add in services and look at the overall current account, then the balance is close to zero.

    Looking at the very short term, can you support a rate cut in March, as some of your colleagues are already saying?

    I don’t want to seem elusive, but the uncertainty is so high that anything can happen. We all agree there is still room for adjusting rates downwards. But we need to be extremely careful. It’s important to stress this idea of a meeting-by-meeting, data-dependent approach. I want to enter the meeting with an open mind, see the staff assessment and process incoming data.

    But we also all agree that we are still in a restrictive territory.

    Suppose tariffs on China stay, that’s a huge demand shock. On the other hand, we have energy prices moving upwards. It could be a transitory phenomenon, but what if this is more entrenched?

    How far are we from the neutral rate and why has the neutral gone up?

    When you have an estimate range that is 50 or 75 basis points, then it’s a conceptual tool and doesn’t have much bearing on policy, given the high uncertainty. Take estimates that it is between 1.75% and 2.25%. Those are two completely different monetary policies, if you are close to target. It’s such a wide range that one number could imply that you are undershooting and another that you are overshooting. So “neutral” is a very powerful analytical concept but not terribly useful for setting monetary policy, given this embedded uncertainty.

    It’s possible this rate went up but it’s also possible it stayed unchanged given how wide the band is.

    You say you are clearly restrictive now. Would that still apply after the next cut? When does the debate start on when restrictive ends?

    We are almost on target. The closer you get to target, the less you’ll need to stay restrictive.

    It’s also true we have been overly optimistic on growth and had to cut our growth forecasts three times since June. So, it is possible that the recovery is not as strong as expected and thus the inflationary pressure coming from demand is weaker. This could prompt us to reassess our concept of restrictiveness.

    Could this mean that you need to become accommodative to avoid an undershoot?

    I assess the risk around inflation to be balanced and I don’t have evidence of a possible undershoot. Long-term inflation expectations are also very well anchored.

    The latest information, especially the rise in the cost of energy, makes me think that we should be prudent. It might be a transitory phenomenon, but prices have risen substantially. Consumer expectations have also gone up a little as they are very reactive to short-term developments.

    I’m not saying that risks are moving towards being on the upside, but we have no evidence of undershooting either.

    Do the growth revisions suggest fundamental changes in how the economy functions?

    Growth has been disappointing, especially because of investments. Consumption may have been less buoyant than we thought, but it remains broadly on the path that we are expecting. The fundamentals for rising consumption are there. Real incomes are increasing, employment is high, inflation is declining and consumer confidence is holding steady.

    The real problem is investments, and that is only partially linked to monetary policy. The culprit is uncertainty. Investments have been weak since the summer given the overall uncertainty and the direction of trade policy after the US election.

    My sense is that people are holding out before making important investment decisions. There is of course a cost component related to interest rates. But you see that people are investing just to replace old capital stock.

    What can the ECB do about it?

    We have to take care of the cost component and avoid being unduly restrictive. Our goal should be to have the economy growing close to potential and to contribute to reducing uncertainty as much as possible.

    Could another targeted longer-term refinancing operation help investments?

    It doesn’t seem to me that the lack of available funding is the issue. We have seen some tightening of credit conditions but that’s not the key factor here.

    Last week we were talking about a 25% tariff, today not anymore, and tomorrow we don’t know. All companies are trying to understand where it’s all going so that they can make investment decisions.

    How does this uncertainty affect the labour market?

    There could be some softening of the labour market but overall we have been positively surprised. We went through a huge disinflation process with a very strong labour market.

    Labour hoarding has two dimensions. One is the cost. Overall, the cost is still relatively low because, by some measures, real wages are still below the pre-pandemic level. The second reason is that firms are afraid of losing skilled labour and this is still the case.

    The labour market is softening, however. The problem is manufacturing essentially. But even there we see some light at the end of the tunnel. There seem to be some initial signs of recovery in the Purchasing Managers’ Index and the Economic Sentiment Indicator. I was surprised to see that confidence in the construction sector and manufacturing activity have bottomed out, and we see some possible signs of recovery. Services are holding up overall. If there is some softening in terms of demand for labour, possibly there will be a pick-up in productivity which will reduce the unit labour cost overall. We obviously need to monitor it because, with all this uncertainty, we could see a deterioration. But I am not overly concerned about the labour market.

    Adding up what you said about these modest signs of recovery in manufacturing, does that mean you still believe in the soft-landing narrative and you don’t see a recession?

    We might not be booming but I am not expecting a recession at all. I think consumption will slowly go up because the fundamentals are there, labour income is growing, the cost of borrowing is declining, inflation is declining, and consumer confidence is basically holding up, so it’s possible that the savings rate will decline from a historic high. So, overall, I think consumption will keep going – and that is a big chunk of the economy. Investment should recover too, as soon as all this uncertainty dissipates. First, one cannot hold back forever: imagine you have a bunch of cumulated investment decisions to make. Even if a small percentage of them go through, it will be a positive and you will see that in investment. Second, less restrictive financial conditions are slowly being transmitted to the cost of financing. And third, in 2025-26 we should see an acceleration in the spending of Next Generation EU funds in Europe.

    Moving to the digital euro. Could you give us an update?

    We have started the procurement process and we will be selecting suppliers in June, but the contracts are such that they will only be triggered if the Governing Council decides to issue the digital euro. We have been working on the rulebook and we will be able to finalise it shortly after we have firm EU legislation in place. For example, whether people can have access to one or more wallets will have an influence on the rulebook, so if we don’t have a final legislation, we cannot finalise the rulebook. But it will not take long once the legislation is approved because we have done as much work as possible in the absence of a firm legislation. So the procurement is done and the rulebook is almost done. We are also working with the market to leverage the innovation potential of the digital euro. We think there is huge potential in conditional payments to increase the quality and the menu of the offering on payments.

    So that is a payment that only happens if a certain condition is fulfilled, right?

    Today there is only one type of conditional payment and it is based on time: pay this amount to this person on this date. We think we can do better than that. To make sure that this intuition is right, at the end of October, we issued a call for innovation partnerships. We were surprised to receive 100 offers. People want to experiment with new ideas. We will be doing that for the next six months and we will then prepare a report.

    Would conditional payments require a blockchain? How else would the condition be verified?

    No, it’s not a matter of blockchain. If you have a way to register the transaction on the ledger through a sort of token, that is a possibility. But technicians tell me you can make a transaction conditional even on a traditional ledger. We are working on that, but the information that I can give you is that we can do better than what we are doing today on conditional payment, regardless of the underlying technology. The technology has a bearing on many dimensions, for example latency and privacy.

    Could you give me an example of a conditional payment that could be settled in digital euro?

    For example, if the train is late, today you have to ask to be reimbursed. You could have a solution in which you only pay if the condition is automatically verified. 

    To conclude with where we are in the preparation phase, let me add that since the digital euro is a product, we have to market it. So, we are engaging with focus groups and using surveys to understand how to best finalise the product in order to meet people’s expectations. We are on schedule, so we should be ready to take a decision on moving to the next project phase by November 2025. I don’t know whether at that time the Governing Council will already be able to take a decision to eventually issue a digital euro because that depends on whether we have a legislation at that point. We have been clear that we would not take any decision about the issuance of a digital euro before the legislative act has been adopted.

    We had expected legislation on the digital euro some time ago. What’s holding up the process? Are you sensing a lack of political will?

    I wouldn’t say there’s a lack of political will. I think people want to understand the whole process. The European Commission issued legislation in June 2023, then the European Parliament started to work on that, but mentally they were not there because there was an EU election coming up. Everything stopped. They are starting to work on this now so, to be fair to them, they didn’t have much time. By contrast, in the Council of the European Union’s working party, work is progressing. As far as I know, they have gone through all of the legislative proposal and they are now focusing on the issues that still need to be worked out.  When both the Council and the Parliament have agreed internally, they will sit down with the Commission and try to finalise the legislation. So, we hope they will be able to reach an agreement internally before the summer. But again, political processes are complex and there are many things on the table. Obviously the sooner the better, but we fully understand their needs. My sense is that there is an increased sense of urgency because of the position that has been taken by the new US Administration. The fact that the US President went in so strong on this idea of promoting worldwide US dollar-denominated stablecoins obviously is a signal. The political world is becoming more alert to this. And it’s possible that we will see an acceleration in the process.

    Stablecoins are similar to money market funds that people use if they don’t want to go via the banking system, whereas the digital euro, with its holding limit, will purely be a means of payment. Why do you think a digital euro would be a good response to stablecoins?  

    You’re right, for as long as stablecoins are not used as a means of payment. My sense is that they will be. This is worrisome because if people in Europe start to use stablecoins to pay, given that most of them are American and dollar-based, they will be transferring their deposits from Europe to the United States. It may start with peer-to-peer, cross-border transactions. Then an American tourist may be able to use stablecoins instead of using a credit card, for example. So stablecoins can enter the payment space, for example, if they can compete with card schemes by reducing the price for the merchant. We have seen that important payment providers have already issued stablecoins, like PayPal, for example.

    Turning now to bitcoin, we know that the ECB has got repo lines and swap lines with other central banks. Would the ECB maintain those with a central bank that has bitcoins among its reserves?

    It’s an interesting question. Fortunately we don’t have to think about that right now because no major central bank is thinking about that.

    One is hypothesising.

    We would need to do a risk management assessment of that. Let’s see if any central bank enters this space because I don’t fully see the rationale for it. We will assess it at that point in time, if it happens. I am trying to be rational and think about why I should invest in bitcoin or another crypto-asset. The only rationale is if one thinks that the price will always go up. It doesn’t have any underlying value, there is no asset backing it, there is no earning model.

    On that, it’s a bit like gold.

    The structures of the two markets are completely different: the transparency of the market, the concentration. So, I would be careful about making the analogy. I don’t know how deep the market for gold is, but there are central banks in that market, and not just because of a legacy system. We should not stop at a superficial analogy between gold and bitcoin.

    Why do central banks invest in gold, other than legacy?

    It’s in part due to legacy, but gold has intrinsic, commercial and industrial value. Bitcoin does not have any of that.

    We’ve seen gold and bitcoin make all-time highs at the same time. Or should we say that fiat currencies are making all-time lows?

    Fiat currencies allow you, among other things, to pay. Good luck trying to pay in bitcoin or gold. Central bank money is the safest asset you can imagine and it’s relatively stable in terms of what you can buy with it.

    MIL OSI Economics

  • MIL-OSI Economics: Steven Maijoor: Cyber resilience in an age of geopolitical tensions

    Source: Bank for International Settlements

    On December 12th 2023, Kyivstar, Ukraine’s largest telecom provider, suffered a cyberattack that disrupted services for millions of users. The attack, attributed to the Russian state-sponsored group Sandworm, was one of the biggest cyber incidents in Ukraine since the onset of the Russian invasion. The hackers had infiltrated Kyivstar’s infrastructure months earlier. They deployed malware that erased thousands of virtual servers and personal computers, crippling the company’s network for managing communication services.

    The attack had several immediate effects. First of all, approximately half of Kyivstar’s network was disabled, leaving millions without mobile and internet connection. But the damage wasn’t limited to the telecom sector. The attack also disrupted banking operations, payment processing, and online banking services. Some ATMs and point-of-sale terminals didn’t work. Financial transactions were in disarray across the country.

    Amazingly, the Ukrainians were quickly able to restore services. Over the past three years they have become quite proficient in dealing with large-scale disruption. Many critical processes in Ukraine are equipped with redundancy measures. Many people even have two sim cards in their phones. That enabled the other Ukrainian telecom providers to circumvent the outage. Services at Kyivstar were gradually reinstated, with almost full restoration achieved eight days after the attack.

    This episode raises some inconvenient questions. What if this would happen to us? What if a large scale Russian or Chinese cyberattack is launched on the telecoms sector of an EU member state? Would it be possible? How much damage could such an attack cause? Would it affect financial services? And would we be able to recover as quickly as the Ukrainians did?

    A few years ago, most people would have found these questions to be rather hypothetical, but today, unfortunately, they have become quite urgent. Geopolitical tensions have been rising for more than a decade, but over the past few years they have accelerated. Countries are re-arming, they are protecting their strategic economic infrastructures, they are imposing trade restrictions and sanctions on each other, and they are weaponising access to international financial infrastructures and services. Needless to say this is bad news for the world economy and the financial sector. But perhaps in no area is the geopolitical threat so real and acute as in the digital domain.

    Apart from the Kyivstar case, there are many other examples to back this up. In late 2023, a Russian hacker breached Microsoft’s corporate network by exploiting a legacy account. As a result, the security and confidentiality of the email accounts of many organisations around the world were potentially compromised. Last year, the FBI discovered a dormant network of Chinese hackers in the United States that had compromised hundreds of routers and that was on standby to launch an attack if called on. And recently, Russian and Chinese vessels were suspected of damaging subsea data cables. Since state-sponsored cyberattacks are often very well concealed, we do not have reliable numbers on how often they occur. But anecdotal information from intelligence agencies, like the Dutch General Intelligence and Security Service, suggest their number is increasing.

    Traditionally, the financial sector has been an attractive target for cyber criminals with financial motives. But with the changing geopolitical climate, nation-state cyberattacks have become a very real possibility. Their main aim is to cause disruption and to steal sensitive information. Nation-state actors possess more resources, sophistication, and endurance than other hackers. And many sectors of the economy have become more vulnerable to large-scale disruption due to increased complexity and digitalisation. This is certainly true of financial services, with their long outsourcing chains and interconnectedness. And many financial firms depend on the same third-party service providers, so if one of these suppliers is attacked, large chunks of the financial sector may experience the knock-on effects. As we showed in our latest Financial Stability overview, a quarter of all reported global cyberattacks can potentially affect the financial sector through a vital process run by a third party on which the financial system depends.

    So, to answer the questions I posed at the start: yes, I think a major state-sponsored cyberattack on the financial sector or one of its supporting sectors could happen. And frankly, I hope we would be able to recover as quickly as the Ukrainians did.

    That is not because financial institutions haven’t prepared. Many financial institutions have taken big steps in recent years to boost their cyber resilience. I think it is fair to say the financial industry is one of the better digitally defended sectors in the economy. As it should be. But given the size and urgency of the threat, we need to do even more to keep financial services safe. This is why cyber resilience will absolutely be a key focus area in our supervision of the financial industry in the coming years. This goes both for De Nederlandsche Bank, and for the European Central Bank.

    Our aim is to make financial services safer against cyber threats. Not only by increasing the resilience of the financial sector itself, but also by stepping up the robustness of the entire chain of ICT service providers. DORA, the European Digital Operational Resilience Act, that came into effect at the beginning of this year, gives us additional tools to accomplish this aim.

    To start with, under DORA, threat-led penetration tests are mandatory for the largest financial institutions in Europe. In the Netherlands we have been conducting these kinds of tests voluntarily for over eight years with good results, and we are very pleased that it is now becoming the norm at the European level.

    But DORA also imposes stricter requirements for managing cyber risks in outsourcing chains. For example, financial firms face stricter rules for conducting due diligence on potential ICT providers. As a result, Fintechs may also experience more stringent due diligence from financial sector customers. And very importantly, under DORA, European supervisors can conduct inspections of critical third-party ICT service providers in tandem with national supervisory authorities. We expect bigtechs like Google and Microsoft to be placed under EU-wide supervision. And, just as with the banks, we are going to test their readiness to detect and withstand cyberattacks.

    Despite all efforts, there is no such thing as perfect cyber security. It is therefore vital that financial institutions take measures to recover quickly after cyber incidents. This is crucial to ensure that services can continue and people don’t lose trust in financial firms or the financial sector as a whole.

    The results of the ECB’s 2024 cyber stress test show that there is room for improvement on the recovery front. So it’s a very good thing that DORA also imposes new requirements on institutions’ continuity plans and backup policies. They need to develop a culture where cyber incidents are quickly detected and reported, they need to have their playbooks in place and they need to have clearly defined management roles and responsibilities. These are key ingredients for an effective response after a cyberattack.

    An important principle of our supervision has always been that financial institutions are responsible for putting their own house in order. And that is also the case with cybersecurity. But if we only focus on individual institutions, we miss something. As I mentioned, on a digital level the financial sector is so interconnected, and connected to other vital sectors of the economy as well, that some degree of overall coordination and cooperation is necessary to arrive at an optimal level of resilience. Notably, recent assessments, derived from nationwide contingency exercises in the Netherlands, reveal various weaknesses. These weaknesses relate to the exchange of information between critical infrastructure providers, the distribution of roles and responsibilities, and the mobilisation of scarce cyber security knowledge and expertise in the event of major cyber incidents.

    So the message here is: we need to work together. Governments should take the lead to improve cross-sectoral cooperation and coordination. They must continue to conduct large-scale cyber-drills and practice activating crisis plans. The insights gained should be used to enhance resilience.

    But there is also a role for financial supervisors like DNB. Under the new legislation, we do not only need to check whether financial firms are compliant, but we also have an obligation ourselves to look over the fence and cooperate closely with other sectors. DNB is putting this into practice by working with vital sectors that are most critical to the financial sector, such as energy and telecommunications. Within our mandate, we support these sectors with information, cooperation and ethical hacking experience.

    To sum up, the threat of major disruptions to our financial system from nation-state cyberattacks has become more urgent. Financial firms, and the entire outsourcing chain on which they depend, therefore need to do whatever they can to further boost their cyber resilience. Both in terms of detection and recovery. Cyber resilience is a top priority for European financial supervisors and there are new European laws in place. And we are going to use these laws to make sure that financial institutions under our supervision are as secure and well defended as possible. Enhancing resilience also means we need to work together. Governments, financial firms, supervisors, telecom, energy and other vital players in the outsourcing chain. Because in cyberspace, we are all linked together. And after all, a chain is only as strong as its weakest link.

    Thank you.

    MIL OSI Economics

  • MIL-OSI Economics: Derville Rowland: Innovation and technology in financial crime 

    Source: Bank for International Settlements

    Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen. It is a pleasure to be with you today and to address a topic so crucial to the future of financial services: the utilisation of innovation and technology to conduct – and most importantly, combat – financial crime. 

    In the mid to late ’90s, when email truly took off as a global tool for commerce, I was a barrister working for the UK’s Crown Prosecution Service amongst others, dealing with various criminal cases including serious frauds. 

    Justified enthusiasm about the ability to connect the world more effectively and efficiently was subsequently dampened somewhat by use of the technology for all manner of deceptions, frauds and financial crimes. 

    Several decades later, we see the same pattern playing out in real-time with artificial intelligence, with criminals using AI tools to bypass customer due diligence controls and carry out fraud via social engineering. 

    These sophisticated methods, including the use of AI tools via text, images, and voice, present significant challenges for regulators and supervisors. 

    There’s a popular saying that the pessimist complains about the wind, the optimist expects it to change, but the realist adjusts the sails. 

    As a regulator with hard-won experience of developing frameworks, building the teams to implement them, and deploying technology to combat financial crime and address misconduct, I’m very much a realist – albeit one who remains stubbornly optimistic. I don’t believe it’s an either/or scenario.  

    Put simply, I believe in the potential benefits of innovation and technology for consumers, investors, businesses and society – and want to see them realised. But this also means the risks must be effectively managed – we must, as it were, adjust the sails. 

    The importance of collective responses

    The risks, of course, need no explanation to this audience. The anonymity of virtual assets can be used to transfer illicit funds quickly and across borders, with criminals increasingly leveraging new technologies to commit fraud, launder the proceeds of crime, and carry out financing of terrorism. The speed at which funds can be moved across borders makes it easier for criminals to exploit the financial system. And so on. 

    Last month, the Central Bank of Ireland published statistics showing the value of fraud in payments in Ireland increased by a quarter in 2023 compared to 2022 – from €100m to circa €126m.1 Fraud was highest in credit transfers and card payments, with the biggest growth seen in money remittance. 

    This echoes trends across Europe, with a joint EBA/ECB report in August 2024 revealing that fraud losses are highest in credit transfer and card payments across the European Economic Area (EEA).2

    Financial crime, of course, recognises no borders. And so, given the scale of the challenge which regulators and law enforcement agencies face, collective action – a harmonised response – is imperative. 

    Which is why the EU’s AML package is so important – it provides the framework and the agency (AMLA) through which we will collectively meet the challenge head on. 

    The AML package is by design technology neutral.  It applies to traditional banking/financial models equally as it applies to crypto-asset service providers (CASPs), crowd-funding platforms and intermediaries. It obliges all types of firms that come within its ambit to comply with a set of AML/CFT rules that have now been harmonised across Europe.  

    How these firms comply with the rules is up to them, via traditional AML/CFT compliance programmes or by using regtech tools. What’s essential is that the means used are effective, and that such effectiveness can be demonstrated to supervisors. 

    This will be the case both for the 40 obliged entities that will be directly supervised by AMLA and the firms supervised by national AML authorities.3  

    Not waiting for the wind to change, the EU has addressed a number of emerging risks in the package. 

    To give some examples, the use of AI is acknowledged under the package, with an obligation on firms to ensure that human oversight is applied to decisions proposed by AI tools that may impact customers in certain areas.

    Additionally, details of Virtual IBANs which are linked to other payment accounts will have to be recorded in member states’ Bank Account Registers. This will allow law enforcement to trace any funds being moved by such Virtual IBANs.  

    Finally, the package introduces the concept of Information Sharing Partnerships. Through these, credit and financial institutions will be enabled to share information relating to high risk customers, subject to important guardrails including data protection assessments.  

    The lack of an ability to share such information has long been pointed to as a real weak link in the system, which could allow someone who had an account closed by one bank on ML/TF grounds to seek to open an account in another.  

    It is hoped that these partnerships will be a real game-changer in the fight to keep bad actors from accessing the financial system in order to launder ill-gotten gains. Tech solutions, including tools which can allow information to be shared between financial institutions in a manner that complies with GDPR, will be essential here.

    The package is also forward-looking in respect of sanctions. 

    Russia’s illegal war against Ukraine exposed some fault lines in the EU’s Financial Sanctions Framework. The package seeks to remedy this by imposing obligations on obliged entities to put in place frameworks to prevent and detect attempted breaches of EU financial sanctions. 

    It also requires obliged entities to ensure that prospective customers, and any person who owns or controls such prospective customers, are screened against the financial sanctions list prior to onboarding. Here again, we see the importance of effective technological solutions – the use of screening tools will be imperative for firms seeking to protect themselves from the possibility of breaching sanctions.

    Developing a wider approach to preventing financial crime

    Money laundering pre-supposes a predicate crime which has generated assets for a criminal. Looking more widely across the landscape, more work is required to put in place a comprehensive financial crime preventative framework that includes fraud.   

    The EU and member states have started thinking about fraud and money laundering more holistically, rather than two silos to be tackled independently. This is very welcome. 

    For our part, the Central Bank of Ireland is approaching AML, fraud, and sanctions through the lens of financial integrity of the system. We are building out a more integrated supervisory framework to look at risk in a more holistic way. We want to take a whole-of-sector, rather than piecemeal, approach, and so very much support emerging EU thinking in this area. 

    As a single market and economic and political union, the EU can point to work already under way and leverage further opportunities to confront the challenges involved. 

    Already, there are a number of other important EU developments aimed at protecting the financial integrity of the system and the citizens who depend on it. 

    PSD3 and the Payment Services Regulation will strengthen customer authentication rules and extending refund rights of consumers who have fallen victim to fraud, among other measures. 

    The EU’s Markets in Crypto Assets Regulation (MiCAR) includes rules relating to the information to be made available to prospective investors in crypto assets, partly in response to the proliferation of scams involving crypto asset issuance. 

    The amended Fund Transfer Regulation ensures that transfers of crypto assets by CASPs must now be accompanied by information on the sender and recipient, in the same way that credit transfers between banks must be.  

    The Instant Payments Regulation (IPR) obliges providers of standard and instant credit transfers to verify the payee at no additional charge to the payer. It also obliges PSPs offering instant credit transfers to screen their customer base against targeted financial sanctions lists at least daily. 

    The various regulatory and policy developments to tackle financial crime cannot succeed in isolation. For this reason, supervisors have been on a steady march away from reliance on traditional supervisory tools and are increasingly exploring ways to transform technology from an enabler of financial crime to a tool in the detection, disruption and successful prosecution of financial crime. 

    In that context, I’d like to mention a significant milestone in the Central Bank of Ireland’s innovation journey – the launch of our Innovation Sandbox Programme last December on the specific theme of Combatting Financial Crime. 

    About the sandbox

    This initiative offers a structured environment for firms to develop innovative solutions in a collaborative environment, ensuring that new technologies are introduced safely and effectively into the financial sector.

    The seven participants in the programme are employing new technologies and innovative methods to develop solutions that tackle financial crime, for the benefit of both the financial system and consumers.

    Participants are representative of a diverse spectrum of innovators from Ireland, across Europe and the UK and feature start-ups, scaling firms, partnerships and established financial services firms.

    Although it is still at an early stage in the programme, several key areas of focus have been identified such as:

    • The use of AI, machine learning, and pattern recognition to detect and prevent fraud; and
    • The use of technology to enable data sharing without compromising sensitive information, allowing real-time verification of identities and other credentials while ensuring full compliance with data protection regulations and the development of digital identity verification tools.

    The Central Bank is organising workshops for participating firms on specific topics relevant to theme of combating financial crime, facilitating bespoke engagement with dedicated relationship managers, and providing access to a data platform offering data sets and tools relevant to the theme. This will allow participants to test and develop their innovation. 

    We are hugely excited about the programme and look forward to sharing the results of it in due course. 

    Conclusion

    In conclusion, I was greatly struck by something Elizabeth McCaul of the ECB Supervisory Board previously said: “Technology is fundamentally a human activity- technology is neither good nor bad, but humans make it so.” 4 

    The reality is that no piece of legislation can contemplate every financial crime risk or typology or close every loophole. We can’t wipe out financial crime – any more than we can wipe out car theft, shoplifting or burglary. But what we can do is to become as effective as possible at reducing its impact.

    Hence, as technology evolves, it behoves regulators and supervisors to evolve too – continually adapting to keep pace with these changes and ensure that, collectively and individually, we are the forefront of protecting the integrity of the financial system and those who use it. 

    Thank you.

    MIL OSI Economics

  • MIL-OSI Economics: Anita Angelovska Bezhoska: Technical and legal aspects of joining SEPA payment schemes

    Source: Bank for International Settlements

    Mr. Paolucci, World Bank team, speakers at the workshop, representatives of financial institutions, distinguished guests,

    It is a true honor and privilege to kick off this important event on payment systems, a topic that touches nearly every aspect of our daily lives and drives economies forward. In today’s rapidly evolving landscape, payment systems are at the core of how businesses, governments, and consumers interact, and in making sure that transactions are seamless, secure and efficient.

    In this vein, enhancing cross-border payments has been a priority both for advanced and emerging economies. For instance, in late 2020, the G20 leaders endorsed the roadmap for enhancing cross-border payments, thus bringing benefits through lower costs, faster speed, higher transparency and improved access in the payments area.  To monitor the progress, BIS launched a monitoring survey among central banks in 2023, covering three main areas: 1) payment system interoperability and extension, 2) data exchange and message standards, and 3) legal, regulatory and supervisory frameworks. The findings of the survey1 reveal that enhancements of the cross-border payments have been underway, as 71% of RTGS systems and 91% of fast payment systems (FPS) have completed or are planning to complete at least two of the priority actions2.  Yet, vast room for improvements remains, including in the area of harmonizing or bringing closer legal, regulatory and supervisory frameworks that are indispensable for smooth and efficient cross-border payments.

    Enhancing cross-border payments is of vital importance for the Western Balkans economies, as well. This region comprises of relatively small and open economies, with their international trade to GDP averaging close to 100%.  Most of them are already highly exposed to EU in terms of trade and financial linkages (close to 60% of their overall export goes to the EU), while intraregional trade needs further deepening. In fact, the latter – enhancement of regional economic integration is the second pillar of the Growth Plan for the Western Balkans.

    Stronger regional economic integration is considered one of the driving forces for faster real convergence, as “small and fragmented markets are unable to exploit economies of scale, and suffer from limited attractiveness to investors-3 “. Hence, there are no doubts that intraregional economic cooperation can serve as a catalyst for lifting the growth potential of the region. According to some estimates, it can potentially add up to 10% to the WB6 economies4. The common regional market is also a critical stepping-stone to the EU’s Single Market.

    Stronger trade and financial integration must be underpinned by efficient payments system. Lowering the time and costs of payment transactions can lift trade volumes, enhance financial flows and support foreign direct inflows that are inevitable for addressing the structural bottlenecks in the region. Although it is acknowledged that the WB region has made immense progress in the payments system area, yet gaps remain and need to be closed. To address these gaps, the World Bank, in collaboration with the Regional Cooperation Council and Central European Free Trade Agreement Secretariat, embarked on Western Balkans Payments Modernization Project, sponsored by the European Commission. Two main pillars of the project are SEPA accession and integration of the region with the ECB’s TARGET Instant Payment Settlement (TIPS) system.

    Let me now elaborate more on the expected benefits from joining SEPA.  The accession to the single payment area holds immense significance for all stakeholders in our economy. For financial institutions, joining SEPA before becoming EU member, means indirect access to European payment systems, eliminating the need for complex and costly correspondent banking arrangements. This simplification will lead to more efficient, cost-effective, and faster cross-border payments. For businesses, SEPA provides a gateway to improved access to the EU market. With standardized and streamlined payment processes, companies can engage in cross-border trade with greater ease, fostering economic growth and regional integration. The World Bank analysis for the costs of euro cross-border payments for micro, small, and medium-sized enterprises in the Western Balkans reveals that it costs approximately 12 times more to transfer €5,000 and 15 times more to transfer €20,000 from the EU to the WB6 than among the EU countries. For citizens, SEPA membership translates to a more affordable, convenient, and secure method for conducting euro transactions. Individuals will benefit from reduced fees on cross-border payments, including for remittances. “It has the potential to reduce the cost of remittances to the Western Balkan economies, which currently amount to 6.71 percent of the total transaction, significantly exceeding the global Sustainable Development Goal target of 3 percent. By meeting this target, the economies could save approximately half a billion euros according to World Bank calculations.”5 Furthermore, SEPA membership will accelerate the digital transformation of our financial sector. By reducing reliance on cash transactions and promoting digital payment methods, it will support the development of a more modern, secure, resilient and inclusive financial ecosystem.

    Recognizing the benefits of joining SEPA, countries in the region have invested tremendous amount of time and resources, while being extensively supported by all stakeholders within the Western Balkans Payments Modernization Project, especially the World Bank. These efforts brought us all either already into SEPA, or very close to a positive decision on joining it.

    Related to this, let me elaborate more on our position.  We submitted our application for SEPA membership on 10th of July last year. This historic step was the culmination of years of dedicated work, legislative overhaul, inter-institutional collaboration, and support from international and European organizations. Completion of the formal assessment of our application and our readiness to join SEPA by the European Payments Council is expected soon. This will confirm our compliance with the European legal and regulatory requirements in critical areas, including payment services, anti-money laundering measures, free movement of capital, and data protection. These foundational elements ensure that our country is well prepared to meet SEPA’s technical and legal requirements. Having said that, an effective accession will be possible only if domestic payment service providers prepare their systems to meet SEPA’s technical and operational requirements.

    Therefore, while the benefits of SEPA accession are clear, we must also acknowledge the challenges that lie ahead. Compliance with SEPA’s regulatory and operational requirements demands investment in infrastructure, staff training, and system upgrades. The banking sector is expected to work diligently to ensure full readiness for integration with SEPA payment systems by October 2025, determined as SEPA first possible entrance date for payment service providers from the Western Balkan countries being SEPA members.

    Of course, the successful implementation of SEPA adherence will require close cooperation between regulators, financial institutions, and all other relevant stakeholders. The National Bank is committed to facilitating this transition. We will continue to provide guidance, technical support, and regulatory oversight to ensure a smooth and efficient integration process. Additionally, we will work closely with the international partners that are genuinely committed to address any challenges. The strong commitment and support has recently led to the formation of a Steering group composed of representatives from relevant EU institutions, who play a key role in the integration process and implementation of SEPA, alongside Governors from the central banks of the region and the World Bank.

    At the end, let me use this opportunity to thank our international and European partners for their continuous support, as well as to all the domestic stakeholders, as I have no doubts that we all fully understand the benefits of this project for spurring growth and supporting the overall wellbeing in the economy.

    I encourage each of you to take full advantage of the sessions, networking opportunities, and discussions ahead. It is through collaboration and exchange of diverse perspectives that we truly grow and make lasting impact.

    Thank you.

    MIL OSI Economics

  • MIL-OSI Economics: Michelle W Bowman: Bank regulation in 2025 and beyond

    Source: Bank for International Settlements

    Thank you for the invitation to speak to you today. It is a pleasure to be with you. I always enjoy the opportunity to meet bankers from across the country to learn about the issues that are important to you. Recently, I have observed a shift in tone when I talk to bankers about the bank regulatory environment. Bankers are cautiously optimistic that we will see meaningful reform that right-sizes regulation and supervisory approach, reforms that-if executed appropriately-should help the banking system promote economic growth in a safe and sound manner. Today, I will share my views on a number of issues related to banking regulation and supervision, including the importance of tailoring, having a problem-focused approach to bank regulation and supervision, and the imperative of innovation in the banking system.

    One of the unique characteristics of the U.S. banking system is the broad scope of institutions it includes and the wide range of customers and communities it serves. Given this wide variety of institutions, regulators must strive to foster a financial system that enables each and every bank, no matter its size, to thrive, supporting a vibrant economy and financial system. We must also be sensitive to emerging issues and trends that require attention, whether that be unintended consequences from capital requirements, the incentives created by our approach to regulatory applications, and to ensure legal compliance.

    Tailoring

    The approach to regulation and supervision should promote a healthy and vibrant banking system. One key element of a regulatory approach that does so, and one that I often highlight, is the use of “tailoring” in the regulatory framework. For those familiar with my philosophy on bank regulation and supervision, my interest and focus on tailoring will come as no surprise. In its most basic form, it is difficult to disagree with the virtue of regulatory and supervisory tailoring-calibrating the requirements and expectations imposed on a firm based on its size, business model, risk profile, and complexity-as a reasonable, appropriate, and responsible approach for bank regulation and supervision. In fact, tailoring is embedded in the statutory fabric of the Federal Reserve’s bank regulatory responsibilities.

    MIL OSI Economics