NewzIntel.com

    • Checkout Page
    • Contact Us
    • Default Redirect Page
    • Frontpage
    • Home-2
    • Home-3
    • Lost Password
    • Member Login
    • Member LogOut
    • Member TOS Page
    • My Account
    • NewzIntel Alert Control-Panel
    • NewzIntel Latest Reports
    • Post Views Counter
    • Privacy Policy
    • Public Individual Page
    • Register
    • Subscription Plan
    • Thank You Page

Category: Canada

  • MIL-OSI: ServiceTrade Sponsors the Heavy Metal Summer Experience Program in Support of its Mission to Inspire Students to Pursue Rewarding Trade Careers

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    DURHAM, N.C. and AUSTIN, Texas, March 03, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — MCAA—ServiceTrade, an innovative software platform designed to optimize commercial service business operations for growth and profit, announced its silver-level sponsorship of the career workshop series called The Heavy Metal Summer Experience. The program is supported by a dedicated group of trade industry associations, vendors, educators, and individuals. In its fifth year, the non-profit program aims to introduce students across the U.S. and Canada to mechanical, electrical, and plumbing careers.   

    “The growth of the mechanical construction and service industry relies on the next generation of workers,” said Angie Simon, president and co-founder of The Heavy Metal Summer Experience. “In 2024, the program held camps at 36 locations across the United States and Canada, a 71% increase in participation over previous years, with approximately 500 students enrolled. The 2025 program will hold sessions in 54 camp locations and reach almost 900 students in the season.”

    The Heavy Metal Summer Experience attracts students from all backgrounds and ethnicities, including 18.7% female students. It introduces students to all aspects of working in the trades, including hands-on learning and working with industrial materials. Students are provided with information on apprenticeship programs, trade specialties, local opportunities for further education, and information about careers in the industrial trades. 

    Careers in the trades are gaining popularity among young people. According to the Associated General Contractors of America, enrollment in focused commercial manufacturing and repair trade programs grew by 11% between 2021 and 2023. Undergraduate college enrollment dropped by 8% in the same period, according to the National Center for Education Statistics. Trade school programs are also faster and less expensive than alternatives, with students finishing programs within two years and quickly finding employment after graduation. 

    “A career in the trades is a terrific path to high job satisfaction, rapid career advancement, and great pay,” said Billy Marshall, Founder and Special Advisor at ServiceTrade.  “The demand for these young skilled workers is extraordinarily high with an estimated current labor shortfall of 14 – 20% in the commercial fire and mechanical service markets.  The Heavy Metal Summer Experience is the right solution at the right time, and we look forward to working alongside its founders to ensure its success.”

    To learn more about ServiceTrade and The Heavy Metal Summer Experience:

    About ServiceTrade  

    ServiceTrade, Inc. is a software platform for commercial mechanical, fire, and life safety contractors. During a chronic skilled labor shortage, ServiceTrade helps commercial contractors increase profit by improving service and project operations, increasing technician productivity, selling more service agreements, and growing customer loyalty. Located in Durham, North Carolina, ServiceTrade was founded in 2012 to automate and streamline the commercial mechanical and fire protection industry and has grown to have more than 1,300 customers. More than 10% of the commercial or industrial buildings in the United States are serviced by contractors using ServiceTrade. Learn more at www.servicetrade.com.

    Media contact:

    Media@KTCMarketingandPR.com

    The MIL Network –

    March 4, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: Alliance Memory to Feature Latest Innovations at Embedded World 2025

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    KIRKLAND, Wash., March 03, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Alliance Memory will display its expanded product portfolio at Embedded World 2025, taking place March 11-13 at the Nuremberg Exhibition Centre in Nuremberg, Germany. In Stand 3A-215, the company will introduce its new 32Mb fast SRAM, DDR4 and LPDDR4X SDRAMs, and high-density Serial NOR Flash devices, all of which enhance device performance with higher density, low power consumption, and rapid data transfer rates to meet the needs of modern applications.

    “Our latest offerings underscore our commitment to meeting the evolving needs of the market with memory solutions that boost efficiency and reliability,” said David Bagby, president and CEO of Alliance Memory. “The new 32Mb fast SRAM, advanced DDR4 and LPDDR4X SDRAMs, and our high-capacity Serial NOR Flash devices are designed to provide our customers with the performance they require for today’s competitive technology landscape.”

    FEATURED PRODUCTS

    32Mb Fast SRAM: Alliance Memory’s newly introduced 32Mb fast SRAM in a 48-ball FBGA package provides a wide power supply range and fast access times, making it ideal for a variety of high-speed applications.

    DDR4 SDRAMs: The company has expanded its CMOS DDR4 SDRAM offerings with 8Gb, 16Gb, and 32Gb devices that combine fast clock speeds up to 1600MHz and transfer rates up to 3200MT/s. The DDR4 SDRAM are available in 78-ball and 96-ball FBGA packages.

    LPDDR4X SDRAM: For mobile and high-performance applications, the new 16Gb LPDDR4X device features increased clock speeds and higher data rates in a 200-ball FBGA package.

    High-Density Serial NOR Flash Devices: New additions to the Serial NOR Flash family include 128Mb, 256Mb, and 512Mb densities, offering flexible, high-performance memory solutions for a broad range of applications, from mobile PCs to connectivity modules.

    To schedule an appointment with Alliance Memory at Embedded World 2025 or for more information about the company’s new products, please contact Bob Decker at bob.decker@redpinesgroup.com.

    About Alliance Memory
    Alliance Memory is a worldwide provider of critical and hard-to-find memory ICs for the communications, computing, consumer electronics, medical, automotive, and industrial markets. The company’s product range includes flash, DRAM, and SRAM memory ICs with commercial, industrial, and automotive operating temperature ranges and densities from 64Kb to 128GB. Privately held, Alliance Memory maintains headquarters in Kirkland, Washington, and regional offices in Europe, Asia, Canada, and South America. More information about Alliance Memory is available online at www.alliancememory.com.

    Agency Contact:
    Bob Decker
    Redpines
    +1 415 409 0233
    bob.decker@redpinesgroup.com

    The MIL Network –

    March 4, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: Central 1 and Intellect Design Arena Ltd. Conclude Operating Partnership Transaction Digital banking operations transferred as of March 3, 2025

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    VANCOUVER, British Columbia and TORONTO, March 03, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Central 1 Credit Union (Central 1) and Intellect Design Arena Ltd. (Intellect) today announced the completion of all necessary closing activities for the operating partnership agreement in which Intellect will assume responsibility for Central 1’s digital banking operations.

    Effective March 3, 2025, operation of Central 1’s Forge, MemberDirect, public website and mobile applications and products, will be transferred to Intellect. Team members from Central 1’s digital banking engineering and service teams will also join the Intellect team to operate Central 1’s digital banking software and support clients as they transition to new digital banking platforms.

    Central 1 will continue to provide the technology infrastructure and related services.

    “The Intellect team, along with those joining from Central 1, bring a strong commitment to seamless service and collaboration. We are confident that this approach provides the most stable path forward for clients and for Central 1 as transitions to new digital banking platforms take place over the next few years,” said Sheila Vokey, CEO of Central 1.

    “We are pleased to welcome the Central 1 team members joining Intellect and reaffirm our deep commitment to credit unions and banks in Canada. As trusted financial partners to millions, credit unions are pivotal in fostering economic resilience and community-driven banking. Their ability to stay ahead in a rapidly evolving landscape depends on a strong digital foundation that balances innovation with stability,” said Rajesh Saxena, CEO of Intellect Global Consumer Banking.

    About Central 1: Central 1 cooperatively empowers credit unions and other financial institutions who deliver banking choice to Canadians. With assets of $11.6 billion as of September 30, 2024, Central 1 provides critical payments, treasury and clearing and settlement services at scale to enable the credit union system. We do this by collaborating with our clients, developing strategies, products, and services to support the financial well-being of their more than five million diverse customers in communities across Canada. For more information, visit central1.com. 

    About Intellect Design: Intellect is an enterprise-grade financial technology leader, providing composable and intelligent solutions for futuristic global financial institutions across 57 countries. Intellect’s revolutionary First Principles Thinking-based Platform, eMACH.ai, is the most comprehensive, composable, and intelligent open finance platform in the world. With three decades of domain expertise, Intellect Design offers a full spectrum of banking and insurance technology products through four lines of business: Global Consumer Banking (iGCB), Global Transaction Banking (iGTB), IntellectAI and Digital Technology for Commerce (iDTC). Intellect Canada delivers proven Retail and Commercial Banking solutions, including Core Banking and Digital platforms, tailored to meet the unique needs of Canadian financial institutions of all sizes. To know more, visit intellectdesign.com

    Caution Regarding Forward Looking Statements 
    This press release and announcement contains historical, forward-looking statements as well as statements about the timing and completion of closing activities and the nature and quality of the services, collaboration and timing of transitions to new digital banking platforms. All statements and other information about anticipated future events may constitute “forward-looking information” under Canadian securities laws. These include, without limitation, statements relating to Central 1’s intention to wind down its digital banking business, and the timeline and processes relating to the same, Central 1’s plans to transition its clients to alternative digital banking providers, as well as statements that contain the words “may,” “will,” “intends” and “anticipates” and other similar words and expressions. 

    Forward-looking information are or may be based on assumptions, uncertainties, and management’s best estimates of future events. Central 1 has based the forward-looking statements on current plans, information, data, estimates, expectations, and projections about, among other things, results of operations, financial, condition, prospects, strategies and future events, and therefore undue reliance should not be placed on them. Forward-looking statements are based on the opinions and estimates of management at the date the statements are made. Actual results may differ materially from those currently anticipated. Securityholders are cautioned that such forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties. Certain important assumptions by Central 1 in making forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, competitive conditions, economic conditions and regulatory considerations. Important risk factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements include economic risks, regulatory risks (including legislative and regulatory developments), risks and uncertainty from the impact of rising or falling interest rates, information technology and cyber risks, environmental and social risk (including climate change), digital disruption and innovation, reputation risk, competitive risk, privacy, data and third-party related risks, risks related to business and operations, risks relating to the transition of clients to alternative digital banking providers, and other risks detailed from time to time in Central 1’s periodic reports filed with securities regulators. Given these risks, the reader is cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. Central 1 undertakes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by applicable laws. 

    Contacts

    The MIL Network –

    March 4, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: Westhaven Announces Updated Preliminary Economic Assessment for the Shovelnose Gold Project, British Columbia

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    After-Tax NPV Doubled to $454 Million

    After-Tax IRR of 43.2%

    Payback of Initial Capital Costs of 2.1 Years

    All amounts are in Canadian Dollars unless otherwise noted

    VANCOUVER, British Columbia, March 03, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Westhaven Gold Corp. (TSX-V:WHN) is pleased to report the completion of an Updated Preliminary Economic Assessment (“PEA”) at its 100% owned 41,634-hectare Shovelnose Gold Property (the “Property”) located within the prospective Spences Bridge Gold Belt (“SBGB”), which borders the Coquihalla Highway 30 kilometres south of Merritt, British Columbia. The PEA outlines a robust, low-cost, rapid pay-back, high margin, 11.1 year underground gold mining opportunity and is based on updated mineral resources that include contributions from the South, Franz and FMN zones.

    At a gold price of US$2,400/oz and an exchange rate of C$1.00 to US$0.72, the Shovelnose base case estimate (the “Base Case”) generates an after-tax net present value (NPV) at a 6% discount rate of $454 million and an internal rate of return (IRR) of 43.2%. The proposed mine will operate over an initial 11.1 year mine-life with average annual life-of-mine gold production of 56,000 ounces. Initial capital expenditure to fund construction and commissioning is estimated at $184 million, with a life-of-mine capital cost of $379 million and a payback period of 2.1 years. The all-in sustaining costs (as defined per World Gold Council guidelines, less corporate G&A) are estimated to be US$836 per ounce of gold produced.

    Summary Table – Economic Sensitivity to Long Term Gold Price

    Long Term Metal Price Variability Corresponding Gold Price After Tax NPV (at 6%) After Tax IRR
    (percentage change) US$/ounce CDN $ millions (%)
    – 20% 1,920 284.3 30.4
    – 10% 2,160 369.1 36.9
    base case 2,400 453.7 43.2
    + 10% 2,640 538.3 49.5
    + 20% 2,880 622.8 55.7

    Gareth Thomas, President & CEO, comments: “Westhaven’s flagship Shovelnose Gold Property is ideally situated, in close proximity to roads, power and infrastructure in a tier 1 mining jurisdiction. Production contribution from both Franz and FMN provide valuable ounces that bring gold production forward in the schedule resulting in payback of initial capital costs in just 2.1 years. Our intention is to continue to advance this cornerstone project in parallel with our ongoing exploration efforts to further expand the gold-silver mineral inventory on this highly prospective land package. The next steps towards rapidly advancing development include further de-risking initiatives such as continued environmental baseline studies, permitting requirements, along with other cost and technical requirements.”

    The Company cautions that the results of the PEA are preliminary in nature and include Inferred Mineral Resources that are considered too speculative geologically to have economic consideration applied to them to be classified as Mineral Reserves. There is no certainty that the results of the PEA will be realized. Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability.

    Preliminary Economic Assessment Highlights:

    *Base case parameters of US$2,400 per ounce gold, US$28 per ounce silver and CDN$/US$ exchange rate of $0.72.
    *All costs are in Canadian dollars unless otherwise specified.

    • Robust financial metrics.
      • Pre-tax Internal Rate of Return (“IRR”) of 56.3%; After-tax IRR of 43.2%.
      • Low All-In Sustaining Cost (“AISC”) of $1,161/ounce (“oz”) (US$836/oz) gold equivalent (“AuEq”).
      • Low Cash Cost of $872 oz/AuEq (US$ 628/oz AuEq).
      • Pre-tax Net Present Value (“NPV”6%) of $730 million (M) and After-tax NPV of $454M.
      • Payback period from start of production year at 1.7 years pre-tax and 2.1 years after-tax.
      • After-tax (NPV 6%) increases to $634M and After-tax IRR increases to 56.6% using spot prices of US$2,900 gold and US$30 silver.
    • Low capital-intensive development and operating costs.
      • Total Preproduction Capital of $184M.
      • Total Life of Mine (“LOM”) Capital Costs of $379M.
      • Average operating cost of $142/ tonne processed.
      • 92% of total stope mining is cost effective longitudinal and traverse longhole stoping, with only 8% of total mining requiring cut and fill stoping.
    • 11.1-year mine life and ability to expand processing to accommodate satellite discoveries.
      • 718,600 total Indicated ounces gold equivalent (“AuEq”) underground Mineral Resource Estimate.

           292,000 total Inferred ounces AuEq underground Mineral Resource Estimate.

    • Production rate of 1,000 tonnes per day (“tpd”).
    • Total payable metals of 637,000 oz gold (“Au”) and 3,562,000 oz silver (“Ag”).
    • Average annual production of 56,000 oz Au peaking in year 7 at 68,000 oz Au.

                            Total mineralized rock production of 4,159,000 tonnes at 5.26 g/t Au and 32 g/t Ag.

    • Metallurgical recoveries of 91.5% Au and 92.9% Ag.
    • Community/stakeholder benefits.
      • Total projected income taxes paid of $284M.
      • Total projected British Columbia mineral taxes paid of $163M.
      • More than 130 well-paying local full time jobs created during life of mine.
      • Additional employment during construction phase.
      • Indirect spin-off benefits during both construction and mine operations.

    Mineral Resources, Updated PEA Preparation and Results

    The previous public Mineral Resource Estimate (“MRE”) for the South Zone was carried out by P&E Mining Consultants Inc. (“P&E”) with an effective date July 18, 2023. The current underground MRE is reported herein. All drilling and assay data were provided by Westhaven, in the form of Excel data files. The GEOVIA GEMS™ V6.8.4 database compiled by P&E for the February 28, 2025 MRE consisted of 355 surface drill holes, totalling 121,971 metres. A total of 145 drill holes (50,714 metres) were intersected by the Mineral Resource wireframes used in this PEA.

    P&E validated the Mineral Resource database in GEMS™ by checking for inconsistencies in analytical units, duplicate entries, interval, length or distance values less than or equal to zero, blank or zero-value assay results, out-of-sequence intervals, intervals or distances greater than the reported drill hole length, inappropriate collar locations, survey and missing interval and coordinate fields. Some minor errors were identified and corrected in the database. The QPs are of the opinion that the supplied database is suitable for Mineral Resource estimation.

    Block models were constructed using GEOVIA GEMS™ V6.8.4 modelling software and consist of separate model attributes for estimated Au, Ag and AuEq grade, rock type (mineralization domains), volume percent, bulk density, and classification. The Mineral Resource was classified as Indicated and Inferred based on the geological interpretation, variogram performance and drill hole spacing. The QPs also consider mineralization at the South, Franz and FMN Zones to be potentially amenable to underground mining methods. The revised MRE used for this Updated PEA is reported with an effective date of February 28, 2025 and is tabulated in Table 1.

    Table 1
    Shovelnose Underground Mineral Resource Estimate @ 1.3 g/t AuEq Cut-off (1-7)
    Classification Zone  Tonnes
    (k)
    Au
    (g/t)
    Contained Au
    (k oz)
    Ag
    (g/t)
    Contained Ag
    (k oz)
    AuEq
    (g/t)
    Contained AuEq
    (k oz)
    Indicated South 3,107 6.18 616.8 33.1 3,302.8 6.56 655.2
    Franz 89 7.44 21.2 30.9 88.0 7.80 22.2
    FMN 241 5.07 39.2 22.5 173.7 5.33 41.2
    Total 3,437 6.13 677.2 32.3 3,564.5 6.50 718.6
    Inferred South 1,386 3.79 168.6 16.5 736.8 3.98 177.2
    Franz 63 3.48 7.1 51.9 105.4 4.09 8.3
    FMN 843 3.49 94.6 37.5 1,017.3 3.93 106.5
    Total 2,292 3.67 270.3 25.2 1,859.5 3.96 292.0
    1.   Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability.
    2.   The estimate of Mineral Resources may be materially affected by environmental, permitting, legal, title, taxation, socio-political, marketing, or other relevant issues.
    3.   The Inferred Mineral Resource in this estimate has a lower level of confidence than that applied to an Indicated Mineral Resource and must not be converted to a Mineral Reserve. It is reasonably expected that the majority of the Inferred Mineral Resource could potentially be upgraded to an Indicated Mineral Resource with continued exploration.
    4.   The Mineral Resources were estimated in accordance with the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum (CIM), CIM Standards on Mineral Resources and Reserves, Definitions (2014) and Best Practices Guidelines (2019) prepared by the CIM Standing Committee on Reserve Definitions and adopted by the CIM Council.
    5.   PEA is preliminary in nature and includes Inferred Mineral Resources that are considered too speculative geologically to have the economic considerations applied to them that would enable them to be classified as Mineral Reserves, and there is no certainty that the PEA will be realized.
    6.   The AuEq cut-off of 1.3 g/t was derived from costs of C$82/t mining, C$42/t processing and $18/t G&A. A USD:CDN exchange rate of 0.72 along with US$2,400/oz Au and US$28/oz Ag with respective process recoveries of 91.5% and 92.9%.
    7.   The Au/Ag ratio used was 86:1.
         

    A financial model was developed to estimate the Life of Mine (“LOM”) plan and considered only underground mining of Mineral Resources at the South, Franz and FMN Zones. Other known gold-silver mineralization at the Shovelnose Gold Property, currently being evaluated by Westhaven, are not included.

    The LOM plan covers a 13.1-year period (2 years pre-production and 11.1 years of production). Currency is in Q1 2025 Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated. Inflation has not been considered in the financial analysis.

    The Updated PEA outlines a production mine life of 11.1 years with average annual production of 56,000 ounces gold and 312,000 ounces silver at average respective cash costs and all-in sustaining costs (“AISC”) per ounce gold equivalent of $1,161(US$836). The PEA considers the payable recovery of 637,000 oz gold and 3,562,000 oz silver from an underground operation, at average respective mine production grades of 5.26 g/t and 32 g/t.

    Revenue

    The commercially saleable product generated by the Project is a gold/silver doré. Westhaven would be paid once the doré has been delivered to a smelter and refinery, off-site.

    The NSR payables were based on the following parameters:
    Dore Payable (Includes refining and smelting)
    Au 99%
    Ag 90%

    The CDN$/US$ exchange rate used in the PEA is 0.72.

    Subtotal Revenue        
    Au (US$) $1,529M
    Ag (US$) $100M
    Net revenue                
    CDN$ $2,201M

    The revenue generation by the Shovelnose Project, on a yearly basis, is presented in Table 2.

    Table 2
    Summary of Base Case Total Revenue Generation
    Item / Year Yr -1 Yr 1 Yr 2 Yr 3 Yr 4 Yr 5 Yr 6 Yr 7 Yr 8 Yr 9 Yr 10 Yr 11 Yr 12 Total
    Tonnes (k) 133.7 330.4 367.5 365.3 365.3 365.3 365.3 365.3 365.3 365.3 365.3 365.3 40.0 4,158.8
    Grade (g/t) – Au 3.98 5.43 4.94 5.52 5.16 5.55 5.59 6.35 5.24 5.05 5.42 4.26 3.93 5.26
    – Ag 27 26 73 32 25 29 36 32 23 25 29 23 25 32
    Au koz  Payable 15.5 52.2 52.8 58.7 54.8 59.0 59.4 67.6 55.8 53.8 57.6 45.3 4.6 637.2
    Ag koz Payable 98.1 232.9 722.4 310.0 242.0 282.3 352.4 316.4 222.8 244.8 287.4 223.6 26.6 3,561.8
    Subtotal Rev.-Au (US$)M 37.2 125.4 126.8 140.8 131.6 141.7 142.6 162.2 133.9 129.0 138.3 108.8 11.0 1,529.3
    -Ag (US$)M 2.7 6.5 20.2 8.7 6.8 7.9 9.9 8.9 6.2 6.9 8.0 6.3 0.7 99.7
    Subtotal Rev. (Cdn$) M 55.4 183.2 204.3 207.6 192.2 207.8 211.8 237.6 194.6 188.8 203.2 159.8 16.3 2,262.5
    Net Royalty (Cdn$) M 5.9 4.6 5.1 5.2 4.8 5.2 5.3 5.9 4.9 4.7 5.1 4.0 0.4 61.1
    Net Revenue (Cdn$) M 49.5 178.6 199.1 202.4 187.4 202.6 206.5 231.7 189.7 184.0 198.2 155.8 15.9 2,201.4


    Note Yr = Year

    The QPs have estimated the net revenues assuming Westhaven has taken advantage of available royalty buy-outs. There is a 2% Net Smelter Return (“NSR”) royalty on the Shovelnose Gold Property held by Franco-Nevada Corp. which Westhaven has the option to buy down to a 1.5% NSR for US$3M. There is a 2% NSR held by Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. which Westhaven has the option to buy down to a 1% NSR for $500,000.

    Costs

    Operating costs:    
    Total average cost   $142/t processed
    Cash Cost / AuEq oz (Cdn$/oz AuEq)   $872/oz AuEq (US$628/oz)
    All-in sustaining cost (“AISC”)(Cdn$/oz AuEq)   $1,161/oz AuEq (US$836/oz)
         
    Capital costs:    
    LOM   $379M
    Sustaining CAPEX   $195M
         

    LOM capital costs include the cost of all mine development; process plant, mine equipment; surface infrastructure; underground infrastructure; a closure cost; a salvage credit; and a 20% contingency.

    Stoping methods utilized are transverse longhole, longitudinal longhole and cut & fill. The average vein widths to be mined are 16.2m, 6.6m and 3.0m respectively.

    Mining unit costs by method are $143.81/t for transverse, $144.94 for longitudinal long hole, and $142.82/t for cut & fill stoping.

    The proportion of mining method during the life of mine is 65% longitudinal longhole, 27% for transverse longhole mining and 8% cut and fill.

    Table 3
    Base Case Cash Flow Summary
    ITEM DESCRIPTION / YEAR UNITS YR
    – 2
    YR
    – 1
    YR
    1
    YR
    2
    YR
    3
    YR
    4
    YR
    5
    YR
    6
    YR
    7
    YR
    8
    YR
    9
    YR
    10
    YR
    11
    YR
    12
    TTL
    Production kt   134 330 368 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 40 4,159
    Au (g/t)   3.9 5.4 4.9 5.5 5.2 5.6 5.6 6.4 5.2 5.1 5.4 4.3 3.9 5.3
    Ag (g/t)   27 26 73 32 25 29 36 32 23 25 29 23 25 32
     
    Revenue M$   50 179 199 202 187 203 206 232 190 184 198 156 16 2,201
     
    Opex Expensed Stope Development (Contractor) M$   11 6 11 13 9 2 6 2 9 3 9 5 1 88
    Longitudinal LH Stoping M$   1 3 3 2 3 3 2 2 2 3 3 4 0.4 30
    Transverse LH Stoping M$       1 2 1 1 2 2 2 1       12
    Cut and Fill Stoping M$   1 2 0.2 1 0.1 1     1   1 1 0.1 7
    Mine G&A M$   3 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 1 62
    Paste Backfill M$   1 1 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 1 34
    Process Plant M$   6 14 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 2 173
    Transport and Place Tailings M$   1 12 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.1 12
    U/G Ore Haulage M$   1 4 6 8 8 8 8 9 8 7 8 8 1 84
    Surface Ore Haulage M$   1 1 1                     3
    Backhaul Paste Backfilll to FMN M$   0.1 0.4 0.2                     1
    Stopckpile Rehandling M$   1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.1 14
    G&A M$     6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 1 71
    Total Opex with Contingency M$   25 45 55 58 53 47 50 47 4 47 53 50 6 589
     
    Capex Mine Development (Contractor) Waste M$   19 21 38 16 9   6 1 6 1 8 3   126
    Process Plant M$ 50 25   4   4   4   4   3     94
    Owner’s Cost M$ 3 5                         8
    Mining Equipment M$   11 7 7   2 2 12 1 5 2 3 4   54
    U/G Infrastructure M$   1 2 1 1   1 1 1 1 1 1 1   13
    Surface Infrastructure M$   48 5 2     2 5   2   5 2   72
    EPCM M$ 9 10                         19
    Closure & Salvage M$   5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 -16 -6
    Total Capex with Contingency M$ 62 122 35 52 18 15 4 28 4 18 4 21 10 -16 379
     
    Taxes Income Tax M$     11 25 24 23 30 31 38 27 28 30 21 -4 284
    Mineral Tax M$   0 3 3 12 16 20 17 24 16 18 17 13 3 163
    Total Taxes M$   0 14 28 37 39 50 48 62 43 46 47 34 0 447
     
    After-Tax Cash Flow M$ -62 -97 85 63 90 80 102 80 118 75 87 77 62 26 785
    After-Tax Cumulative Cash Flow M$ -62 -160 -75 -11 78 158 260 340 458 533 620 697 759 785  
     
    After-tax IRR %   43.2
    After-tax NPV @ 6% M$   454


    Cash Flow Sensitivity Analysis

    The following after-tax cash flow analysis was completed:

    Net Present Value (“NPV”) (at 5%, 6%, 7%, 8%, 9% and 10% discount rates).
    Internal Rate of Return (“IRR”).
    Payback period.

    The summary of the results of the cash flow sensitivity analysis is presented in Table 4

    Table 4
    Base Case Cash Flow Sensitivity Analysis
    Description Discount Rate Units Value
    Undiscounted After-Tax CF 0% (M$) 785
    Internal Rate of Return % 43.2
    After-Tax NPV at 5% (M$) 496
    Base Case 6% (M$) 454
    7% (M$) 415
    8% (M$) 380
    9% (M$) 348
    10% (M$) 319
    After-Tax Total Project Payback (including pre-production) Years 4.1

    The Project was evaluated on an after-tax cash flow basis which generates a net undiscounted cash flow estimated at $785M. This results in an after-tax IRR of 43.2% and an after-tax NPV of $454 M when using a 6% discount rate. In the base case scenario, the Project has a payback period of 4.1 years from the start of the Project. The average life-of-mine cash cost is $872/oz AuEq (US$628/oz AuEq), at an average operating cost of $142/t processed. The average life-of-mine all-in sustaining cost (“AISC”) is estimated at $1,161/oz AuEq (US$836/oz AuEq).

    Sensitivity Analysis

    Project risks can be identified in both economic and non-economic terms. Key economic risks were examined by running cash flow sensitivities to: gold metal price; silver metal price; gold process plant head grade; gold metallurgical recovery; operating costs; and capital costs.

    Each of the sensitivity items were varied up and down by 10% and 20% to assess the effect they would have on the NPV at a 6% discount rate. The value of each parameter, at 80%, 90%, 100% base case, 110% and 120%, is presented in Table 5.

    Table 5
    NPV Sensitivity Parameter Values
    Parameter 80% 90% 100% 110% 120%
    Au Metal Price US$/oz 1,920 2,160 2,400 2,640 2,880
    Ag Metal Price US$/oz 22.40 25.20 28.00 30.80 33.60
    Au Head Grade g/t 4.21 4.73 5.26 5.79 6.31
    Au Met Recovery % N/A 82.4% 91.5% N/A N/A
    Capex $M 304 342 379 417 455
    Opex $M 471 530 589 648 707

    The resultant after-tax NPV @ 6% values of each of the sensitivity parameters at 80% to 120% are presented in Table 6.

    Table 6
    After-Tax NPV Sensitivity to Base Case at 6% Discount Rate (M$)
    Parameter 80% 90% 100% 110% 120%
    Au Metal Price 284 369 454 538 623
    Ag Metal Price 442 448 454 459 465
    Au Head Grade 284 369 454 538 623
    Au Met Recovery N/A 369 454 N/A N/A
    Capex 515 484 454 423 392
    Opex 502 478 454 429 405


    Cautionary Statement

    The Updated PEA is considered by P&E Mining Consultants Inc. (“P&E”) to meet the requirements as defined in Canadian National Instrument (“NI”) 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects. This PEA is preliminary in nature and includes Inferred Mineral Resources that are considered too speculative geologically to have the economic considerations applied to them that would enable them to be classified as Mineral Reserves, and there is no certainty that the PEA will be realized. Mineral Resources are not Mineral Reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability. There is no guarantee that Westhaven Gold Corp. will be successful in obtaining any or all of the requisite consents, permits or approvals, regulatory or otherwise for the Project to be placed into production. The PEA was prepared in accordance with the requirements of NI 43-101 and has an effective date of February 28, 2025. A technical report relating to the PEA, prepared in accordance with NI 43-101, will be filed on SEDAR and posted on the company’s website within 45 days of this news release.

    On behalf of the Board of Directors
    WESTHAVEN GOLD CORP.

    “Gareth Thomas”

    Gareth Thomas, President, CEO & Director

    Qualified Person Statement

    The Preliminary Economic Assessment for the Shovelnose Gold Property – South Zone was prepared by James L. Pearson, P.Eng., D. Grant Feasby, P.Eng., Yungang Wu, P.Geo., Antoine Yassa, P.Geo., Brian Ray, P.Geo. and Eugene Puritch, P.Eng., FEC, CET of P&E Mining Consultants Inc., Brampton, Ontario, all Independent Qualified Persons as defined by National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects. The PEA results are based on important assumptions made by the Qualified Persons who prepared the PEA. These assumptions, and the justifications for them, will be described in the PEA Technical Report that the Company will file on SEDAR and post on the Company’s website within 45 days of this news release. Mr. Puritch has reviewed and approved the technical contents of this news release.

    Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

    About Westhaven Gold Corp.

    Westhaven is a gold-focused exploration company advancing the high-grade discovery on the Shovelnose project in Canada’s newest gold district, the Spences Bridge Gold Belt. Westhaven controls ~61,512 hectares (~615 square kilometres) with four gold properties spread along this underexplored belt. The Shovelnose property is situated off a major highway, near power, rail, large producing mines, and within commuting distance from the city of Merritt, which translates into low-cost exploration. Westhaven trades on the TSX Venture Exchange under the ticker symbol WHN. For further information, please call 604-681-5558 or visit Westhaven’s website at www.westhavengold.com

    Forward-Looking Statements

    The TSX Venture Exchange has not reviewed this press release and does not accept responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this news release. 

    Certain information contained herein constitutes “forward-looking information” under Canadian securities legislation. Forward-looking information includes, but is not limited to, statements with respect to the results of the Preliminary Economic Assessment, the Mineral Resource Estimate future planned activities, future mineral production and future growth potential for the Company and its projects.  Generally, forward-looking information can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “will” or variations of such words and phrases or statements that certain actions, events or results “will” occur.  Forward-looking statements are based on the opinions and estimates of management as of the date such statements are made, and they are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the actual results to be materially different from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements or forward-looking information. Assumptions have been made regarding, among other things, the price of gold and other precious metals; costs of exploration and development; the estimated costs of development of exploration projects; the Company’s ability to operate in a safe and effective manner and its ability to obtain financing on reasonable terms. Although management of Westhaven Gold Corp. have attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in forward-looking statements or forward-looking information, there may be other factors that cause results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended.  Many factors, both known and unknown, could cause actual results, performance, or achievements to be materially different from the results, performance or achievements that are or may be expressed or implied by such forward‐looking statements or forward-looking information. Such factors include, without limitation: the Company’s dependence on one group of mineral projects; precious metals price volatility; regulatory, consent or permitting delays; risks relating to reliance on the Company’s management team and outside contractors; risks regarding mineral resources and reserves; the Company’s inability to obtain insurance to cover all risks, on a commercially reasonable basis or at all; currency fluctuations; risks regarding the failure to generate sufficient cash flow from operations; risks relating to project financing and equity issuances; risks and unknowns inherent in all mining projects, including the inaccuracy of reserves and resources, metallurgical recoveries and capital and operating costs of such projects; laws and regulations governing the environment, health and safety; operating or technical difficulties in connection with mining or development activities; employee relations, labour unrest or unavailability; the Company’s interactions with surrounding communities; the speculative nature of exploration and development, including the risks of diminishing quantities or grades of reserves; stock market volatility; conflicts of interest among certain directors and officers; and the factors identified under the caption “Risk Factors” in the Company’s management discussion and analysis. There can be no assurance that such forward-looking statements or information will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements.  Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements and forward-looking information.  The Company will not update any forward-looking statements or forward-looking information that are incorporated by reference herein, except as required by applicable securities laws.

    Westhaven’s Properties across the Spences Bridge Gold Belt

    2025 PEA Proposed Development Zones

    Shovelnose Proposed Mine Site Development & Infrastructure Layout

    Maps accompanying this announcement are available at: 

    https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/ed38b683-123a-44cf-86f5-1c63049a9351

    https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/b5ea66ea-6e4d-49c3-b1ae-78624a357568

    https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/2652ea09-9d55-45a5-b6e2-346b3e1ddea5

    The MIL Network –

    March 4, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Global: America’s designs on annexing Canada have a long history − and record of political failures

    Source: The Conversation – USA – By G. Patrick O’Brien, Assistant Teaching Professor of History, University of Tampa

    Donald Trump has repeatedly raised the specter of annexing Canada since his inauguration to a second term as president.

    The president’s rhetoric about making Canada “the 51st state” may seem to project confidence, a 21st-century vision of manifest destiny, a belief in the United States’ right and obligation to expand.

    Trump is not the first American leader to dream of northern expansion. To me, a historian of early U.S.-Canadian relations, these designs suggest not power, but weakness and simmering divisions inside the United States.

    Early Americans’ lust for Canada

    Even before independence, social conflict helped turn American eyes northward. Throughout the 18th century, England’s Colonial population in North America doubled every 25 years. Successive generations of Colonists along the Eastern Seaboard had to compete with each other, and with Indigenous people, for resources, arable land and trade.

    These unhappy, land-hungry Colonists clamored for expansion, instigating a series of wars against both the French and Spanish empires for control of the northeastern half of the continent, culminating in the French and Indian War, from 1754 to 1763.

    While these Colonists were animated by their thirst for expansion, they had little else unifying them. Many Americans today are familiar with the “Join, or Die” cartoon Ben Franklin printed, featuring a segmented snake with each section representing one of the Colonies. However, few realize that it was not crafted during the Revolution to unite Colonists against Britain, but in 1754, to rally divided British Colonists in their war against France.

    This famous image urging the American Colonies to unite was in support of a war against France, not Britain.
    Benjamin Franklin via Wikimedia Commons

    Britain finished conquering Canada in 1763, but the empire never fully supported Colonial expansion northward. In the 1750s and 1760s, British troops forcibly removed French colonists from Acadia in Nova Scotia and recruited thousands of Colonists from neighboring New England to move north. These settlers had long imagined the region rich in fishing and timber to be a land of opportunity. But disillusioned by the financial cost of sustaining their settlements, many of these Colonists returned to New England by the early 1770s.

    Attempts to settle other lands ceded by France were no more successful. Fearful that Colonists might provoke a costly war with Indigenous people, Parliament issued the Proclamation of 1763, which attempted to protect native land by discouraging Colonial expansion westward. Many Colonists turned against Britain in response, especially those like George Washington, who had speculated in the land west of the Appalachian Mountains.

    The failed invasion of Canada

    In the earliest months of the Revolution, the Continental Congress authorized an American invasion of British-occupied Quebec. In a letter addressed to “Friends and Brethren” of Canada, Washington himself implored Canadians to join invading troops. “The Cause of America, and of Liberty, is the Cause of every virtuous American Citizen,” he wrote. “Come then, ye generous Citizens, range yourselves under the Standard of general Liberty.”

    But at home, Colonists were far from united in their rebellion. Historians estimate that around 20% of the white Colonial population, more than 500,000 people, remained loyal to Britain, and an even larger number hoped to remain neutral.

    The difficult realities of conquest also turned many soldiers against the invasion of Canada. In late October 1775, nearly a quarter of the underfed and overworked troops under the command of soon-to-be turncoat Benedict Arnold abandoned their arduous journey through interior Maine toward Canada. The soldiers who carried on prayed these deserters “might die by the way, or meet with some disaster, Equal to the Cowardly dastardly and unfriendly Spirit they discover’d in returning Back without orders.”

    The more resilient troops who reached Quebec were emphatically defeated by British forces in December, making Washington skeptical of any future efforts to attack Canada.

    American troops clash with British soldiers and the French defenders of Quebec in December 1775.
    Charles William Jefferys, cover art for ‘The Father of British Canada: A Chronicle of Carleton,’ Volume 12 by William Wood, 1916

    19th-century divisions

    Following American independence, tens of thousands of loyal Colonists sailed north to Canada, determined to build British colonies that would become what one of these refugees called “the envy of the American States.” Their presence on the contested northern border was an unsettling reminder to the new American nation about the power Britain still exerted on the continent.

    Conflict with Britain over land and trade in the early 1800s reopened old divisions among Americans. Virginia Congressman John Randolph expressed his frustrations with renewed calls for a northern invasion. “We have but one word, like the whip-poor-will, but one eternal monstrous tone,” an exasperated Randolph noted, “Canada! Canada! Canada!”

    The debate over Canada was one of many issues dividing the nation, and as President James Madison would later explain, he hoped that war would help unify a polarized nation. His gamble paid off, but only after opponents from New England flirted with the idea of secession to negotiate their own end to conflict.

    When the popular editor and columnist John O’Sullivan called for the annexation of Texas and war with Mexico in 1845, he also suggested the annexation of Canada would naturally follow. The anti-expansionist response united pacifists, abolitionists and a variety of religious and literary figures, helping deepen the divides that would lead to the Civil War.

    Annexation talk in the 20th century

    Trump’s posturing has served to unite Canadians and revive Canadian nationalism. In the U.S., most people seem to understand the practical hurdles of adding a new state or dismiss the idea altogether.

    A Canadian demonstrates in Washington, D.C., against President Donald Trump’s policies on Feb. 17, 2025.
    Dominic Gwinn/Middle East Images/AFP via Getty Images

    One example of annexation talk from the 20th century, however, might serve as a warning to Trump, showing how aggressive rhetoric toward Canada has led to political defeat. In 1911, a bill creating free trade with Canada passed Congress with the support of President William Taft, despite objections from protectionists in both parties.

    In an attempt to have the agreement defeated in the Canadian Parliament, U.S. opponents from both sides of the aisle attempted to stir popular sentiment against the U.S. in Canada. Champ Clark, the Democratic speaker of the House and a front-runner for the presidential nomination in 1912, seized on the moment.

    “I hope to see the day when the American flag will float over every square foot of the British North American possessions, clear to the North Pole,” Champ proclaimed on the House floor. William Stiles Bennet, a Republican, proposed a resolution that would authorize the president to begin negotiations for annexation.

    Their approach to defeating the trade agreement worked, at least in Canada. In the general election of September 1911, worried Canadian voters ousted the Liberal Party, which had supported free trade, and the new Conservative majority rejected the agreement.

    Back home, however, the plan backfired. Woodrow Wilson, not Clark, secured the Democratic nomination in 1912 and would go on to defeat both the incumbent Taft and former President Theodore Roosevelt. The bluster led not to success and victory, but loss and defeat.

    G. Patrick O’Brien does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    – ref. America’s designs on annexing Canada have a long history − and record of political failures – https://theconversation.com/americas-designs-on-annexing-canada-have-a-long-history-and-record-of-political-failures-250229

    MIL OSI – Global Reports –

    March 4, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: New Stratus Energy Announces Award of a Transformative Production Sharing Contract for a Significant Oil Field in Ecuador, Funding and Offtake Agreement, and Concurrent Offerings

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION TO UNITED STATES NEWSWIRE SERVICES OR FOR DISSEMINATION IN THE UNITED STATES

    CALGARY, Alberta, March 03, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — New Stratus Energy Inc. (TSX.V – NSE) (“New Stratus”, “NSE” or the “Corporation”) is pleased to announce that a consortium formed by subsidiaries of Sinopec International Petroleum E&P Corporation (60%) (“Sinopec”) and New Stratus (40%) (the “Consortium”) has reached an agreement for an award by the Ministry of Energy and Mines of Ecuador (“MEM”) of a 20-year (renewable) production sharing contract (the “PSC”) for crude oil production and additional exploration relating to Block 60 in Ecuador, also known as the “Sacha Block”, for an upfront cash entry bonus of US$1.5 billion (US$600 million payable by NSE). Formal execution of the PSC (“PSC Execution”) by the Consortium and MEM is expected to occur in March 2025 and upon which the Corporation will acquire a 40% interest (the “Acquired Interest”) in the Sacha Block.

    Highlights:

    • Average production in 2024 for the Sacha Block was approximately 77,191 barrels per day (bbl/d) of medium oil (25 degrees API gravity). Average gross production(1) in 2024 attributable to the Acquired Interest was approximately 30,876 bbl/d, implying US$19,433 per flowing barrel.
    • The average prices for WTI and Oriente Blend in December 2024 were US$70.12 and US$64.11, respectively. Currently, production from the Sacha Block receives a positive quality adjustment over Oriente Blend pricing of approximately US$2.50. Accordingly, using average production for December 2024 of 73,711 bbl/d, gross revenue(2) for the month of December 2024 attributable to the Acquired Interest was approximately US$60.9 million (approximately C$87.7 million).
    • As at December 31, 2024, proved developed producing (“PDP”) gross reserves(3) for the Acquired Interest are estimated at 67.8 million barrels, implying US$8.85 per barrel.
    • As at December 31, 2024, before-tax PDP reserve net present value of future net revenue(4) at a 10% discount rate (“PDP NPV 10”) for the Acquired Interest is estimated at US$2.4 billion (approximately C$3.5 billion), implying 0.25x before-tax PDP reserve net present value. The before-tax PDP NPV10 for the Acquired Interest is described in more detail in the chart below and implies a 1.13x before-tax PDP NPV10 for 2025.
      Period Ending
    December 31,
        PDP NPV10(4) for
    Acquired Interest
     
      2025     US$ 530.8 million  
      2026     US$ 413.1 million  
      2027     US$ 317.7 million  
      2028-2044     US$ 1,148.4 million  
      Total    

    US$ 2,410.1million(5)

     
               

    PSC Award and Terms

    On February 28, 2025, the official Committee for Hydrocarbons Tenders formed by the MEM, the Ministry of Finance and a representative of the President of Ecuador, approved the PSC and recommended to the MEM to grant the PSC to the Consortium. The PSC Execution by the Consortium and MEM is expected to occur in March 2025 and upon the Consortium paying an upfront cash entry bonus (“Entry Bonus”) to the Republic of Ecuador in the amount of US$1.5 billion (approximately C$2.2 billion), or US$600 million (approximately C$864 million) payable by NSE in accordance with its Acquired Interest.

    The PSC will be awarded for an initial 20-year term (the “Initial Term”) and pursuant to which the Consortium shall receive a share of production (known as the “X Factor”) calculated on a sliding scale basis depending on the prevailing Oriente Blend price (which is correlated to the price of WTI). At a WTI price of US$65 per barrel, the government production share is anticipated to be 18%, resulting in a Consortium production share, or X Factor, of 82%.

    In addition to the Entry Bonus, the Consortium has agreed to invest (the “Capital Investment”) amounts in excess of US$1.7 billion (approximately C$2.4 billion) during the Initial Term to finance a development plan approved by MEM (the “Approved Development Plan”). The Corporation’s share of the Capital Investment is approximately US$680 million (approximately C$979 million), of which approximately US$64 million (approximately C$92 million) and US$159 million (approximately C$229 million) are expected to be invested in 2025 and 2026, respectively. NSE expects to fund its share of the Capital Investment primarily through cash flow from operations, as well as from additional debt financing. The objectives of the Approved Development Plan are, among other things: (i) to replace and upgrade current facilities; (ii) for the expansion and construction of new facilities; (iii) for drilling new wells, workovers, recompletions, and water injection wells; (iv) for the drilling of two exploration wells; (v) for projects to eliminate gas flaring; and (vi) for secondary recovery which is intended to take the current oil recovery rate from 23% to 30%.

    No other royalties, or other similar production share arrangements, are payable and all operating expenses, capital expenses and taxes are on the account of the Consortium.

    The PSC Execution is subject to customary approval by the TSX Venture Exchange (“TSXV”). No finder’s fee is payable in connection with the PSC. The PSC, and the transactions contemplated thereby, are arm’s length.

    Ecuadorian Regulatory Framework

    The Ecuadorian government recently implemented policies to optimize the production from its oil and gas assets and aimed at attracting private investment, including reinstating production sharing contracts pursuant to the country’s Hydrocarbons Law and the 2018 executive decree no. 449. In accordance with the reinstated production sharing contracts, the Ecuadorian government may enter into production sharing contracts whereby the investing entity receives a share of the oil produced. The term for a production sharing contract is generally four years for exploration (extendable for two additional years) and 20 years for production, subject to an extension if reserves have been added and new investments are committed. The PSC includes the continuation and increase of production by the Consortium, as well as additional exploration in the Sacha Block.

    Sacha Block

    With an approximate area of 355 km2 and located in Central Ecuador, the Sacha Block has been operated by EP Petroecuador since 1990. The Sacha Block main reservoir is the Lower Cretaceous Hollin sandstone, with secondary reservoirs in the Upper Cretaceous Napo ‘T’ and ‘U’ sands.

    Pursuant to the PSC, the Consortium has committed to increase production for the Sacha Block to over 105,000 bbl/d by the end of 2029 (the “Production Increase”) and intends to achieve the Production Increase by providing the Capital Investment and completing the Approved Development Plan.

    Acquired Interest Funding

    NSE’s portion of the Entry Bonus will be satisfied through a combination of the following funding sources: (i) a funding and off-take agreement with a leading global off-taker (the “Off-Taker”) in the amount of US$480 million (approximately C$691 million); (ii) the Subscription Receipt Offering (as defined below) for aggregate gross proceeds of approximately US$70 million (C$100 million); (iii) the Common Share Offering (as defined below) for aggregate gross proceeds of approximately US$10 million (C$14 million); and (iv) additional amounts through a combination of debt, convertible debt or other equity financing sources (collectively, the “Additional Financing”).

    Off-take Mandate and Senior Secured Prepayment Facility

    NSE has appointed the Off-Taker as exclusive mandated lead arranger of an up to US$480 million (approximately C$691 million) senior secured prepayment facility (the “Facility”) and exclusive off-taker. The Facility has a cost of SOFR + 9.5%, a five-year final maturity date, and a minimum amortization equal to 1/16th of the original principal amount per quarter after a one-year grace period. As exclusive off-taker, the Off-Taker will have the right to purchase NSE’s share of the production from the Sacha Block for five years.

    Concurrent Offerings

    NSE intends to complete brokered private placements of (i) subscription receipts of the Corporation (“Subscription Receipts”) for gross proceeds of up to approximately US$70 million (C$100 million) (the “Subscription Receipt Offering”); and (ii) common shares of the Corporation (“Common Shares”) for gross proceeds of up to approximately US$10 million (C$14 million) (the “Common Share Offering” and together with the Subscription Receipt Offering, the “Concurrent Offerings”). The number of Subscription Receipts and Common Shares to be sold, the offering price (the “Offering Price”) of the Subscription Receipts and Common Shares, and the terms of the Concurrent Offerings will be determined in the context of the market. NSE expects to issue a subsequent news release containing the final terms of the Concurrent Offerings following the time of pricing.

    New Stratus has received lead indications of interest: (i) for the Common Share Offering from a U.S.-based energy specialist institutional investor; and (ii) for the Subscription Receipt Offering from a group of global energy specialist institutional investors, all based on an expected Offering Price reflecting the customary discount to the trading price for financings of this nature.

    The Concurrent Offerings are being co-led by Ventum Financial Corp. (“Ventum”) and Cormark Securities Inc. (“Cormark” and together with Ventum, the “Lead Agents”) on their own behalf, and in respect of the Subscription Receipt Offering, on behalf of a syndicate of agents (the “Agents”). Each Subscription Receipt will entitle the holder thereof to automatically receive, without payment of any additional consideration or further action on the part of the holder, one Common Share upon completion of certain escrow release conditions in accordance with the terms of a subscription receipt agreement to be entered into between the Corporation, the Lead Agents and Odyssey Trust Company, as subscription receipt agent (the “Subscription Receipt Agent”), including, among other things, the completion of all conditions precedent to the PSC Execution other than payment of the Entry Bonus.

    In addition, NSE will grant the Agents an option (the “Agents’ Option”) to increase the size of the Subscription Receipt Offering by up to 15% by giving written notice of the exercise of the Agents’ Option, or a part thereof, to NSE at any time up to 48 hours prior to closing of the Subscription Receipt Offering.

    In consideration for their services, the Agents will receive a commission equal to 6.0% of the gross proceeds (the “Subscription Receipt Commission”) of the Subscription Receipt Offering and the Lead Agents will receive a commission equal to 6.0% of the gross proceeds of the Common Share Offering.

    The proceeds from the sale of the Subscription Receipts less 50% of the Subscription Receipt Commission and the Agents’ expenses incurred in connection with the Subscription Receipt Offering (the “Escrowed Proceeds”) will be held by the Subscription Receipt Agent. If (i) an escrow release notice and direction is not delivered to the Subscription Receipt Agent prior to by 5:00 p.m. (Calgary time) on May 15, 2025; (ii) the Corporation gives notice to the Agents that it does not intend to proceed with the PSC Execution; or (iii) the Corporation announces to the public that it does not intend to proceed with the PSC Execution (each, a “Termination Event” and the time of the earliest of such Termination Event to occur, the “Termination Time” and the date on which such Termination Time occurs, the “Termination Date”), the Subscription Receipt Agent will pay to each holder of Subscription Receipts, no earlier than the third business day following the Termination Date, an amount per Subscription Receipt equal to the issue price in respect of such Subscription Receipt, plus such holder’s proportionate share of any interest and other income received or credited on the investment of the Escrowed Proceeds between the closing date and the Termination Date.

    The securities to be issued under the Concurrent Offerings will be offered by way of private placement in (i) all of the provinces of Canada, (ii) the United States and (iii) such other jurisdictions as may be determined by the Corporation, in each case, pursuant to applicable exemptions from the prospectus requirements under applicable securities laws. The Concurrent Offerings are expected to close on or about March 25,
    2025, subject to TSXV approval and other customary closing conditions.

    The securities issued pursuant to the Concurrent Offerings, and any securities issued on exchange or conversion thereof, are subject to a statutory four-month hold period from the date(s) of closing of the Concurrent Offerings and applicable U.S. resale restrictions.

    Additional Financing

    The Corporation expects to issue a subsequent news release containing the details of the Additional Financing once an agreement has been reached in respect of same, which will include the material terms of such transaction.

    Disposition of Interest in Venezuela

    NSE also announces that it has entered into a termination agreement pursuant to which it has formally dissolved its joint venture for the development of four oil fields located in eastern Venezuela. This joint venture was structured through an indirect 40% equity participation in Vencupet SA, facilitated via Gold Pillar International SPC Ltd. (“GP”), a British Virgin Islands-based fund that holds 40% of Vencupet.

    The Vencupet oil fields development project included a financing arrangement under which GP would provide funding for the rehabilitation of these oil wells. In return, PDVSA was to repay the financing and to compensate GP with oil produced through the assignment of crude oil shipments.

    Following the termination of its joint venture, NSE has relinquished its entire equity stake in DOOG at no cost. Additionally, all shareholder loans extended by NSE to DOOG in the amount of approximately US$4.1 million have been forgiven, and all counterparty agreements and consideration arrangements have been terminated, without any further obligation or liability to NSE, except for specific compensation to GP’s principal shareholder, in the event that certain anticipated project costs cannot be recovered from PDVSA within fourteen months of the termination date.

    For two years from the termination, NSE will be allowed to negotiate the terms to reacquire its shareholding in DOOG and in the Vencupet project, in terms to be agreed between the Parties.

    Financial Advisors

    Ventum, Cormark and Horizon Partners are acting as financial advisors to the Corporation with respect to the transaction. ECM Capital Advisors Inc. is acting as strategic advisor to the Corporation with respect to the transaction.

    Contact Information:

    Jose Francisco Arata
    Chairman & Chief Executive Officer
    jfarata@newstratus.energy

    Wade Felesky
    President & Director
    wfelesky@newstratus.energy

    Mario Miranda
    Chief Financial Officer
    mmiranda@newstratus.energy – (647) 498-9109

    Notes:

    (1) Average gross production attributable to the Acquired Interest is presented before any deductions relating to the government share, because the government share was not payable as at December 31, 2024. Applying an example government share of 18%, net production attributable to the Acquired Interest would have been 25,319 bbl/d.
    (2) Gross revenue for December 2024 attributable to the Acquired Interest is calculated using December 2024 average production and December 2024 average pricing (being Oriente Blend pricing plus the positive quality adjustment), and is presented before any deductions relating to the government share, because the government share was not payable as at December 31, 2024. Applying an example government share of 18%, net revenue for the month of December 2024 attributable to the Acquired Interest would have been approximately US$49.9 million (approximately C$71.9 million).
    (3) As at December 31, 2024, Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc. (“NSAI”) estimates the gross PDP reserves for the Sacha Block (100% working interest) to be 169.5 million barrels. Gross reserves attributable to the Acquired Interest are based on a 40% working interest and are presented before any deductions relating to the government share.
    (4) As at December 31, 2024, NSAI estimates the net present value of future net revenue before income taxes discounted at 10 percent for the PDP reserves for the Sacha Block (100% working interest) to be US$6.0 billion. Net present value of future net revenue attributable to the Acquired Interest is based on a 40% working interest and is presented before any deductions relating to the government share, because the government share was not payable as at December 31, 2024. Following the acquisition of the Acquired Interest, NSE will be required to pay the government share, which is estimated to be 18% at a WTI price of US$65 per barrel.
    (5) Total value may not add due to rounding.

    Note on Currency and Exchange Rates

    In this news release, references to “C$” or “$” are to Canadian dollars and references to “US$” are to United States dollars. In this news release, the Corporation has used a currency exchange rate of US$1.00 = C$1.44.

    Forward-Looking Information

    Certain information set forth in this news release constitutes “forward-looking statements”, and “forward-looking information” under applicable securities legislation (collectively, “forward-looking statements”). All statements other than statements of historical fact are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements may be identified by the use of conditional or future tenses or by the use of words such as “will”, “expects”, “intends”, “may”, “should”, “estimates”, “anticipates”, “believes”, “projects”, “plans”, and similar expressions, including variations thereof and negative forms. Forward-looking statements in this news release include, among others, timing of the PSC Execution; satisfaction or waiver of the conditions precedent to the PSC Execution, including the funding and payment of the Entry Bonus; receipt of required legal and regulatory approvals for the PSC Execution (including approval of the TSXV); expected production and revenue related to the Sacha Block; the anticipated dates of the PSC Execution; the terms (including the Offering Price), timing and completion of the Concurrent Offerings; the indications of interest and the lead orders for the Concurrent Offerings; the timing and completion of the Additional Financing and the terms thereof; the closing of the Facility and the terms thereof; the use of proceeds from the Concurrent Offerings, the Additional Financing and the Facility; the amount, terms and timing of the Capital Investment, and the resulting effect thereof on production levels, including the Production Increase; the terms and timing of the Approved Development Plan, and the resulting effect thereof on production levels, including the Production Increase; and the Consortium’s ability to replicate past performance in the Sacha Block. Forward-looking statements are based on the Corporation’s current internal expectations, estimates, projections, assumptions and beliefs, which may prove to be incorrect. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and undue reliance should not be placed on them.

    In respect of the forward-looking statements contained herein, the Corporation has provided them in reliance on certain key expectations and assumptions made by management, including expectations and assumptions concerning the receipt of all approvals and satisfaction of all conditions to the completion of the PSC Execution, the Concurrent Offerings, and the Facility, the operational and financial performance of the Sacha Block, the geological characteristics of the Sacha Block, the availability of debt and equity financing on terms acceptable to the Corporation, the cooperation of the Consortium, prevailing weather conditions, prevailing legislation affecting the oil and gas industry, commodity prices and exchange rates.

    Although NSE believes that the expectations and assumptions on which the forward-looking statements are based are reasonable, undue reliance should not be placed on the forward-looking statements because NSE can give no assurance that they will prove to be correct. Such forward-looking statements necessarily involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties, which may cause actual performance and financial results in future periods to differ materially from any projections of future performance or results expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to: risks associated with the oil and gas industry in general (e.g., operational risks in development, exploration and production; the uncertainty of reserve estimates; the uncertainty of estimates and projections relating to production, costs and expenses, and health, safety and environmental risks); risks associated with negotiating with foreign governments as well as country risk associated with conducting international activities; the impact of general economic conditions in Canada and Ecuador; prolonged volatility in commodity prices; the risk that the new U.S. administration imposes tariffs affecting the oil and gas industry in Ecuador or globally, and that such tariffs (and/or retaliatory tariffs in response thereto) adversely affect the demand for the Corporation’s production, or otherwise adversely affects the Corporation’s business or operations; the risk that Oriente Blend oil prices are lower than anticipated; determinations by OPEC and other countries as to production levels; the risk of changes in government policy on resource development; industry conditions including changes in laws and regulations including adoption of new environmental laws and regulations, and changes in how they are interpreted and enforced; the timing for conducting planned operations and the results of such operations, including flow rates and resulting production; the availability of the requisite personnel and equipment to conduct operations; the ability to successfully integrate operations and realize the anticipated benefits of acquisitions; the ability to increase production, and the anticipated cost associated therewith; failure of counterparties to perform under contracts; changes in currency exchange rates; interest rate fluctuations; the ability to secure adequate equity and debt financing; and management’s ability to anticipate and manage the foregoing factors and risks.

    There can be no assurance that forward-looking statements will prove to be accurate, and actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. New Stratus undertakes no obligation to update forward-looking statements if circumstances or management’s estimates or opinions should change except as required by applicable securities laws. Actual results, performance or achievement could differ materially from those   expressed in, or implied by, these forward-looking statements and, accordingly, no assurance can be given that any of the events anticipated by the forward-looking statements will transpire or occur, or if any of them do so, what benefits may be derived therefrom.

    Oil & Gas Matters Advisory

    The reserves information included in this news release attributable to the Acquired Interest has been derived from a report prepared by Netherland, Sewall & Associates, Inc. (“NSAI”) effective as of December 31, 2024 (the “NSAI Report”). The reserves information was prepared in accordance with the Canadian Oil and Gas Evaluation Handbook and National Instrument 51-101 Standards of Disclosure for Oil and Gas Activities.

    Statements relating to reserves are deemed to be forward-looking statements, as they involve the implied assessment, based on certain estimates and assumptions, that the reserves described exist in the quantities predicted or estimated. The reserve estimates described herein are estimates only. The actual reserves may be greater or less than those calculated.

    It should not be assumed that the estimates of future net revenues presented herein represent the fair market value of the reserves. There are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating quantities of crude oil, reserves and the future net revenues attributed to such reserves.

    References in this news release to historical production rates are not indicative of long term performance or of ultimate recovery. Readers are cautioned not to place reliance on such rates in assessing the future production rates for the Corporation.

    “Proved Developed Producing Reserves” are those reserves that are expected to be recovered from completion intervals open at the time of the estimate. These reserves may be currently producing or, if shut-in, they must have previously been on production, and the date of resumption of production must be known with reasonable certainty.

    Medium crude oil is crude oil with a relative density greater than 22.3 degrees API gravity and less than or equal to 31.1 degrees API gravity.

    General Advisory

    This announcement does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy securities in the United States, nor may any securities referred to herein be offered or sold in the United States absent registration or an exemption from registration under the United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “U.S. Securities Act”) and the rules and regulations thereunder. The securities referred to herein have not been and will not be registered under the U.S. Securities Act or any state securities laws. Accordingly, the securities may not be offered or sold within the United States except in transactions exempt from the registration requirements of the U.S. Securities Act and applicable state securities laws.

    Neither TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

    The MIL Network –

    March 4, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: North American Construction Group Ltd. Reschedules Fourth Quarter Results Conference Call and Webcast

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    ACHESON, Alberta, March 03, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — North American Construction Group Ltd. (“NACG” or “the Company”) (TSX:NOA.TO/NYSE:NOA) announced today that it has rescheduled the release of its financial results and conference call for the fourth quarter ended December 31, 2024, which had previously been scheduled on Wednesday, March 5, 2025 and Thursday March 6, 2025, respectively. The Company will release its financial results for the fourth quarter ended December 31, 2024 on Wednesday, March 12, 2025 after markets close. Following the release of its financial results, NACG will hold a conference call and webcast on Thursday, March 13, 2025, at 7:00 a.m. Mountain Time (9:00 a.m. Eastern Time).

    The Company is rescheduling the release of its financial results and related conference call to allow it more time to complete the year-end reporting processes within its Heavy Equipment – Australia segment. The additional time is necessary due to first-year SOX reporting requirements, high activity levels at year-end and its implementation of a new ERP system, all within the segment which was previously a privately held entity.

    The call can be accessed by dialing:
    Toll free: 1-800-717-1738
    Conference ID: 71653

    A replay will be available through April 13, 2025, by dialing:
    Toll Free: 1-888-660-6264
    Conference ID: 71653
    Playback Passcode: 71653

    A slide deck for the webcast will be available for download the evening prior to the call and will be found on the company’s website at www.nacg.ca/presentations/

    The live presentation and webcast can be accessed at: North American Construction Group Ltd. Fourth Quarter Results Conference Call and Webcast Registration

    A replay will be available until April 13, 2025, using the link provided.

    About the Company

    North American Construction Group Ltd. is a premier provider of heavy civil construction and mining services in Australia, Canada and the U.S. For over 70 years, NACG has provided services to the mining, resource and infrastructure construction markets.

    For further information, please contact:        

    Jason Veenstra, CPA, CA
    Chief Financial Officer
    North American Construction Group Ltd.
    Phone: (780) 960-7171
    Email: ir@nacg.ca 

    The MIL Network –

    March 4, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: Monroe Capital Corporation BDC Announces Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2024 Results

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    CHICAGO, March 03, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Monroe Capital Corporation (NASDAQ: MRCC) today announced its financial results for the fourth quarter and full year ended December 31, 2024. The Board of Directors of Monroe also declared its first quarter distribution of $0.25 per share, payable on March 31, 2025 to stockholders of record on March 14, 2025.

    Except where the context suggests otherwise, the terms “Company,” “we,” “us,” and “our” refer to Monroe Capital Corporation (together with its subsidiaries).

    Fourth Quarter 2024 Financial Highlights

    • Net Investment Income (“NII”) of $6.0 million, or $0.28 per share
    • Adjusted Net Investment Income (a non-GAAP measure described below) of $6.2 million, or $0.29 per share
    • Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations of $(1.7) million, or $(0.08) per share
    • Net Asset Value (“NAV”) of $191.8 million, or $8.85 per share
    • Paid quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share on December 30, 2024
    • Current annual cash dividend yield to stockholders of approximately 11.4%(1)

    Full Year 2024 Financial Highlights

    • NII of $24.5 million, or $1.13 per share
    • Adjusted Net Investment Income (a non-GAAP measure described below) of $25.0 million, or $1.15 per share
    • Net increase in net assets resulting from operations of $9.7 million, or $0.45 per share

    Chief Executive Officer Theodore L. Koenig commented, “We are pleased to announce that we paid a $0.25 per share dividend during the fourth quarter. Our predominantly first lien portfolio continued to generate attractive risk-adjusted returns during the fourth quarter, with Adjusted Net Investment Income supporting a compelling 11.4% annualized dividend yield. We remain committed to prudent portfolio management, with a focus on maintaining the portfolio’s asset quality across varying economic environments.”

    Monroe Capital Corporation is a business development company affiliate of the award-winning private credit investment firm and lender, Monroe Capital LLC.
    _______________________
    (1) Based on an annualized dividend and closing share price as of February 28, 2025.

    Management Commentary

    Adjusted Net Investment Income totaled $6.2 million, or $0.29 per share for the quarter ended December 31, 2024, a decrease from $6.6 million, or $0.31 per share for the quarter ended September 30, 2024. NAV decreased by $0.33 per share, or 3.6%, to $191.8 million or $8.85 per share as of December 31, 2024, compared to $198.9 million or $9.18 per share as of September 30, 2024. The decrease in NAV this quarter was primarily the result of net unrealized losses associated with a certain portfolio company, partially offset by NII in excess of the dividend paid during the quarter.

    At quarter end, the Company’s debt-to-equity leverage increased from 1.50 times debt-to-equity at September 30, 2024 to 1.53 times debt-to-equity at December 31, 2024 as a result of the timing of certain portfolio company paydowns. These proceeds were used to pay down the revolving credit facility subsequent to year-end. We continue to focus on managing our investment portfolio and selectively redeploying capital resulting from future repayments.

    Selected Financial Highlights
    (in thousands, except per share data)

      December 31, 2024   September 30, 2024
    Consolidated Statements of Assets and Liabilities data: (audited)   (unaudited)
    Investments, at fair value $ 457,048     $ 474,259  
    Total assets $ 490,671     $ 501,862  
    Net assets $ 191,762     $ 198,893  
    Net asset value per share $ 8.85     $ 9.18  
                   
      For the Quarters Ended
      December 31, 2024   September 30, 2024
    Consolidated Statements of Operations data: (unaudited)
    Net investment income $ 6,022     $ 6,481  
    Adjusted net investment income(2) $ 6,185     $ 6,617  
    Net gain (loss) $ (7,737 )   $ (1,515 )
    Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations $ (1,715 )   $ 4,966  
           
    Per share data:      
    Net investment income $ 0.28     $ 0.30  
    Adjusted net investment income(2) $ 0.29     $ 0.31  
    Net gain (loss) $ (0.36 )   $ (0.07 )
    Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations $ (0.08 )   $ 0.23  
                   

    _______________________
    (2) See Non-GAAP Financial Measure – Adjusted Net Investment Income below for a detailed description of this non-GAAP measure and a reconciliation from NII to Adjusted Net Investment Income. The Company uses this non-GAAP financial measure internally in analyzing financial results and believes that this non-GAAP financial measure is useful to investors as an additional tool to evaluate ongoing results and trends for the Company.

    Portfolio Summary

      December 31, 2024   September 30, 2024
      (unaudited)
    Investments, at fair value $ 457,048     $ 474,259  
    Number of portfolio company investments   91       94  
    Percentage portfolio company investments on non-accrual(3)   3.4 %     3.1 %
    Weighted average contractual yield(4)   10.2 %     11.0 %
    Weighted average effective yield(4)   10.2 %     11.0 %
           
    Asset class percentage at fair value:      
    First lien loans   79.1 %     80.0 %
    Junior secured loans   6.5 %     6.4 %
    Equity securities   14.4 %     13.6 %
                   

    _______________________
    (3) Represents portfolio loans or preferred equity investments on non-accrual status as a percentage of total investments at fair value.
    (4) Portfolio yield is calculated only on the portion of the portfolio that has a contractual coupon and therefore does not account for dividends on equity investments (other than preferred equity investments).

    Financial Review

    Results of Operations: Fourth Quarter 2024

    NII for the quarter ended December 31, 2024 totaled $6.0 million, or $0.28 per share, compared to $6.5 million, or $0.30 per share, for the quarter ended September 30, 2024. Adjusted Net Investment Income was $6.2 million, or $0.29 per share, for the quarter ended December 31, 2024, compared to $6.6 million, or $0.31 per share, for the quarter ended September 30, 2024. Excluding the impact of the incentive fee limitations of $(1.2) million and $(0.7) million for the quarters ended December 31, 2024 and September 30, 2024, respectively, Adjusted Net Investment Income totaled $5.0 million, or $0.23 per share for the quarter ended December 31, 2024, a decrease from $5.9 million, or $0.27 per share for the quarter ended September 30, 2024. Please refer to the Company’s Form 10-K for additional information on the Company’s incentive fee structure and calculation.

    Total investment income for the quarter ended December 31, 2024 totaled $14.0 million, compared to $15.7 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2024. Total investment income decreased by $1.7 million primarily due to the declining interest rate environment. The decrease in average invested assets and lower other income also contributed to the decrease in total investment income.

    Total expenses for the quarter ended December 31, 2024 were $8.0 million, compared to $9.2 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2024. Excluding the impact of the incentive fee limitations, total expenses decreased by $0.7 million primarily due to lower interest and other debt financing expenses associated with the lower interest rate environment and a decrease in average debt outstanding during the quarter.

    Net gain (loss) was $(7.7) million for the quarter ended December 31, 2024, compared to $(1.5) million for the quarter ended September 30, 2024. Unrealized losses associated with the change in fair value for a certain portfolio company was the primary driver of the net loss on investments during the quarter ended December 31, 2024.

    The Company’s average portfolio mark decreased by 1.7%, from 93.9% of amortized cost as of September 30, 2024 to 92.2% of amortized cost as of December 31, 2024.

    Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations was $(1.7) million, or $(0.08) per share, for the quarter ended December 31, 2024, compared to $5.0 million, or $0.23 per share, for the quarter ended September 30, 2024.

    Results of Operations: Full Year 2024

    NII for the year ended December 31, 2024 totaled $24.5 million, or $1.13 per share, compared to $23.2 million, or $1.07 per share, for the year ended December 31, 2023. Adjusted Net Investment Income was $25.0 million, or $1.15 per share, for the year ended December 31, 2024, compared to $24.1 million, or $1.11 per share, for the year ended December 31, 2023. Excluding the impact of the incentive fee limitations of $2.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2024 (no incentive fee limitations for the year ended December 31, 2023), Adjusted Net Investment Income totaled $22.1 million, or $1.01 per share, for the year ended December 31, 2024, a decrease from $24.1 million, or $1.11 per share, for the year ended December 31, 2023. Please refer to the Company’s Form 10-K for additional information on the Company’s incentive fee structure and calculation.

    Total investment income for the year ended December 31, 2024 totaled $60.5 million, compared to $64.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2023. The decrease in investment income of $3.8 million during the year ended December 31, 2024, compared to the year ended December 31, 2023, was primarily due to lower interest income and payment-in-kind (“PIK”) interest income. The reduction in interest income and PIK interest income was primarily driven by a decrease in average invested assets and the placement of additional portfolio companies on non-accrual status. Lower effective rates on the portfolio resulting from the declining interest rate environment during the second half of the year ended December 31, 2024 also contributed to the decrease in both interest income and PIK interest income. The decrease in interest income and PIK interest income was partially offset by an increase in other income, primarily driven by the reversal of $1.6 million in previously accrued fees related to the former loan investment in IT Global Holding LLC, which was recognized during the year ended December 31, 2023.

    Total expenses for the year ended December 31, 2024 were $36.0 million, compared to $41.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2023. Excluding the impact of the incentive fee limitations, total expenses decreased by $2.1 million primarily due to lower interest and other debt financing expenses associated with a decrease in average debt outstanding during the quarter. Lower base management fees associated with the decline in invested assets during the year also contributed to the decrease in total expenses.

    Net gain (loss) was $(14.8) million for the year ended December 31, 2024, compared to $(22.9) million for the year ended December 31, 2023. This net loss for the year ended December 31, 2024 was primarily due to mark-to-market losses from certain portfolio companies that were still held as of December 31, 2024. These unrealized losses were partially offset by mark-to-market gains in the rest of the portfolio, driven by spread tightening in the direct lending markets during the year.

    The Company’s average portfolio mark decreased by 3.4%, from 95.6% of amortized cost as of December 31, 2023 to 92.2% of amortized cost as of December 31, 2024.

    Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations was $9.7 million, or $0.45 per share, for the year ended December 31, 2024, compared to $0.4 million, or $0.02 per share, for the year ended December 31, 2023.

    Liquidity and Capital Resources

    As of December 31, 2024, the Company had $9.0 million in cash and cash equivalents, $163.9 million of debt outstanding on its revolving credit facility and $130.0 million of debt outstanding on its 2026 Notes. As of December 31, 2024, the Company had approximately $91.1 million available for additional borrowings on its revolving credit facility, subject to borrowing base availability.

    MRCC Senior Loan Fund

    MRCC Senior Loan Fund I, LLC (“SLF”) is a joint venture with Life Insurance Company of the Southwest (“LSW”), an affiliate of National Life Insurance Company. SLF invests primarily in senior secured loans to middle market companies in the United States. The Company and LSW have each committed $50.0 million of capital to the joint venture. As of December 31, 2024, the Company had made net capital contributions of $42.7 million in SLF with a fair value of $32.7 million, as compared to net capital contributions of $42.7 million in SLF with a fair value of $32.9 million as of September 30, 2024. During the quarter ended December 31, 2024, the Company received dividend income from SLF of $0.9 million, consistent with the $0.9 million received during the quarter ended September 30, 2024. SLF’s underlying investments are loans to middle-market borrowers that are generally larger than the rest of MRCC’s portfolio which is focused on lower middle-market companies. SLF’s average mark on the underlying investment portfolio decreased slightly during the quarter, from 87.0% of amortized cost as of September 30, 2024, to 86.8% of amortized cost as of December 31, 2024.

    As of December 31, 2024, SLF had total assets of $104.2 million (including investments at fair value of $98.0 million), total liabilities of $38.7 million (including borrowings under the $110.0 million secured revolving credit facility with Capital One, N.A. (the “SLF Credit Facility”) of $38.2 million) and total members’ capital of $65.5 million. As of September 30, 2024, SLF had total assets of $107.8 million (including investments at fair value of $98.7 million), total liabilities of $42.0 million (including borrowings under the SLF Credit Facility of $41.5 million) and total members’ capital of $65.8 million.

    Non-GAAP Financial Measure – Adjusted Net Investment Income

    On a supplemental basis, the Company discloses Adjusted Net Investment Income (including on a per share basis) which is a financial measure that is calculated and presented on a basis of methodology other than in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles of the United States of America (“non-GAAP”). Adjusted Net Investment Income represents NII, excluding the net capital gains incentive fee and income taxes. The Company uses this non-GAAP financial measure internally in analyzing financial results and believes that this non-GAAP financial measure is useful to investors as an additional tool to evaluate ongoing results and trends for the Company. The management agreement with the Company’s advisor provides that a capital gains incentive fee is determined and paid annually with respect to realized capital gains (but not unrealized capital gains) to the extent such realized capital gains exceed realized and unrealized capital losses for such year. Management believes that Adjusted Net Investment Income is a useful indicator of operations exclusive of any net capital gains incentive fee as NII does not include gains associated with the capital gains incentive fee.

    The following tables provide a reconciliation from NII (the most comparable GAAP measure) to Adjusted Net Investment Income for the periods presented (in thousands, except per share data):

       
      For the Quarters Ended
      December 31, 2024   September 30, 2024
      Amount   Per Share
    Amount
      Amount   Per Share
    Amount
      (unaudited)
    Net investment income $ 6,022     $ 0.28     $ 6,481     $ 0.30  
    Net capital gains incentive fee   —       —       —       —  
    Income taxes, including excise taxes   163       0.01       136       0.01  
    Adjusted Net Investment Income $ 6,185     $ 0.29     $ 6,617     $ 0.31  
                                   
      For the Years Ended
      December 31, 2024   December 31, 2023
      Amount   Per Share
    Amount
      Amount   Per Share
    Amount
      (unaudited)
    Net investment income $ 24,532     $ 1.13     $ 23,249     $ 1.07  
    Net capital gains incentive fee   —       —       —       —  
    Income taxes, including excise taxes   452       0.02       806       0.04  
    Adjusted Net Investment Income $ 24,984     $ 1.15     $ 24,055     $ 1.11  
                                   

    Adjusted Net Investment Income may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other companies, as it is a non-GAAP financial measure that is not based on a comprehensive set of accounting rules or principles and therefore may be defined differently by other companies. In addition, Adjusted Net Investment Income should be considered in addition to, not as a substitute for, or superior to, financial measures determined in accordance with GAAP.

    Fourth Quarter 2024 Financial Results Conference Call

    The Company will host a webcast and conference call to discuss these operating and financial results on Monday, March 3, 2025 at 12:00 p.m. Eastern Time. The webcast will be hosted on a webcast link located in the Investor Relations section of the Company’s website at http://ir.monroebdc.com/events.cfm. To participate in the conference call, please dial (800) 715-9871 approximately 10 minutes prior to the call. Please reference conference ID # 7817000.

    For those unable to listen to the live broadcast, the webcast will be available for replay on the Company’s website approximately two hours after the event.

    For a more detailed discussion of the financial and other information included in this press release, please also refer to the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024, which was filed with the SEC (www.sec.gov) on Friday, February 28, 2025.

    First Quarter 2025 Distribution

    The Board of Directors of the Company declared its first quarter distribution of $0.25 per share, payable on March 31, 2025 to stockholders of record on March 14, 2025. In October 2012, the Company adopted a dividend reinvestment plan that provides for reinvestment of distributions on behalf of its stockholders, unless a stockholder elects to receive cash prior to the record date. When the Company declares a cash distribution, stockholders who have not opted out of the dividend reinvestment plan prior to the record date will have their distribution automatically reinvested in additional shares of the Company’s capital stock. The specific tax characteristics of the distribution will be reported to stockholders on Form 1099 after the end of the calendar year and in the Company’s periodic report filed with the SEC.

               
    MONROE CAPITAL CORPORATION
    CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
    (in thousands, except per share data)
               
      December 31,
    2024
      September 30,
    2024
      December 31,
    2023
      (audited)   (unaudited)   (audited)
    Assets          
    Investments, at fair value:          
    Non-controlled/non-affiliate company investments $ 343,835     $ 355,273     $ 371,723  
    Non-controlled affiliate company investments   80,483       86,089       83,541  
    Controlled affiliate company investments   32,730       32,897       33,122  
    Total investments, at fair value (amortized cost of: $495,797, $505,008 and $510,876 respectively)   457,048       474,259       488,386  
    Cash and cash equivalents   9,044       4,070       4,958  
    Interest and dividend receivable   23,511       22,910       19,349  
    Other assets   1,068       623       493  
    Total assets $ 490,671     $ 501,862     $ 513,186  
    Liabilities          
    Debt $ 293,900     $ 299,000     $ 304,100  
    Less: Unamortized debt issuance costs   (1,925 )     (2,254 )     (3,235 )
    Total debt, less unamortized debt issuance costs   291,975       296,746       300,865  
    Interest payable   2,903       1,351       3,078  
    Base management fees payable   1,965       2,006       2,100  
    Incentive fees payable   —       730       1,319  
    Accounts payable and accrued expenses   2,066       2,090       2,100  
    Directors’ fees payable   —       46       —  
    Total liabilities   298,909       302,969       309,462  
    Net Assets          
    Common stock, $0.001 par value, 100,000 shares authorized, 21,666, 21,666 and 21,666 shares issued and outstanding, respectively $ 22     $ 22     $ 22  
    Capital in excess of par value   297,712       298,127       298,127  
    Accumulated undistributed (overdistributed) earnings   (105,972 )     (99,256 )     (94,425 )
    Total net assets $ 191,762     $ 198,893     $ 203,724  
    Total liabilities and total net assets $ 490,671     $ 501,862     $ 513,186  
    Net asset value per share $ 8.85     $ 9.18     $ 9.40  
                           
    MONROE CAPITAL CORPORATION
    CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
    (in thousands, except per share data)
     
      For the Quarters Ended   For the Years Ended
      December 31,
    2024
      September 30,
    2024
      December 31,
    2024
      December 31,
    2023
      (unaudited)   (audited)
    Investment income:              
    Non-controlled/non-affiliate company investments:              
    Interest income $ 8,576     $ 10,408     $ 40,787     $ 46,241  
    Payment-in-kind interest income   1,379       919       3,877       3,070  
    Dividend income   237       114       472       305  
    Other income   310       694       1,306       (679 )
    Total investment income from non-controlled/non-affiliate company investments   10,502       12,135       46,442       48,937  
    Non-controlled affiliate company investments:              
    Interest income   1,300       1,202       4,963       5,140  
    Payment-in-kind interest income   1,247       1,402       5,284       6,337  
    Dividend income   56       56       220       283  
    Other income   18       —       18       —  
    Total investment income from non-controlled affiliate company investments   2,621       2,660       10,485       11,760  
    Controlled affiliate company investments:              
    Dividend income   900       900       3,600       3,600  
    Total investment income from controlled affiliate company investments   900       900       3,600       3,600  
    Total investment income   14,023       15,695       60,527       64,297  
    Operating expenses:              
    Interest and other debt financing expenses   5,113       5,517       21,917       22,847  
    Base management fees   1,965       2,006       8,056       8,603  
    Incentive fees   —       730       2,449       5,812  
    Professional fees   196       239       902       719  
    Administrative service fees   282       270       1,011       940  
    General and administrative expenses   233       270       964       1,174  
    Directors’ fees   49       46       244       147  
    Total operating expenses   7,838       9,078       35,543       40,242  
    Net investment income before income taxes   6,185       6,617       24,984       24,055  
    Income taxes, including excise taxes   163       136       452       806  
    Net investment income   6,022       6,481       24,532       23,249  
    Net gain (loss):              
    Net realized gain (loss):              
    Non-controlled/non-affiliate company investments   283       638       1,431       (38,769 )
    Foreign currency forward contracts   —       —       —       1,756  
    Foreign currency and other transactions   —       —       —       (135 )
    Net realized gain (loss)   283       638       1,431       (37,148 )
    Net change in unrealized gain (loss):              
    Non-controlled/non-affiliate company investments   (1,139 )     (2,743 )     (8,211 )     22,154  
    Non-controlled affiliate company investments   (6,694 )     771       (7,656 )     (3,990 )
    Controlled affiliate company investments   (167 )     (201 )     (392 )     (2,387 )
    Foreign currency forward contracts   —       —       —       (1,507 )
    Foreign currency and other transactions   (20 )     20       —       —  
    Net change in unrealized gain (loss)   (8,020 )     (2,153 )     (16,259 )     14,270  
    Net gain (loss)   (7,737 )     (1,515 )     (14,828 )     (22,878 )
    Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations $ (1,715 )   $ 4,966     $ 9,704     $ 371  
    Per common share data:              
    Net investment income per share – basic and diluted $ 0.28     $ 0.30     $ 1.13     $ 1.07  
    Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations per share – basic and diluted $ (0.08 )   $ 0.23     $ 0.45     $ 0.02  
    Weighted average common shares outstanding – basic and diluted   21,666       21,666       21,666       21,666  
                                   

    Additional Supplemental Information:

    The composition of the Company’s investment income was as follows (in thousands):

      For the Quarters Ended
      For the Years Ended
      December 31,
    2024
      September 30,
    2024

      December 31,
    2024
      December 31,
    2023
      (unaudited)   (audited)
    Interest income $ 9,468     $ 11,303     $ 44,283     $ 49,779  
    Payment-in-kind interest income   2,626       2,321       9,161       9,407  
    Dividend income   1,193       1,070       4,292       4,188  
    Other income   328       694       1,324       (679 )
    Prepayment gain (loss)   173       109       532       553  
    Accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums   235       198       935       1,049  
    Total investment income $ 14,023     $ 15,695     $ 60,527     $ 64,297  
                                   

    The composition of the Company’s interest expense and other debt financing expenses was as follows (in thousands):

      For the Quarters Ended   For the Years Ended
      December 31,
    2024
      September 30,
    2024
      December 31,
    2024
      December 31,
    2023
      (unaudited)   (audited)
    Interest expense – revolving credit facility $ 3,227     $ 3,630     $ 14,380     $ 15,319  
    Interest expense – 2026 Notes   1,555       1,555       6,220       6,220  
    Amortization of debt issuance costs   331       332       1,317       1,308  
    Total interest and other debt financing expenses $ 5,113     $ 5,517     $ 21,917     $ 22,847  
                                   

    About Monroe Capital Corporation

    Monroe Capital Corporation is a publicly-traded specialty finance company that principally invests in senior, unitranche and junior secured debt and, to a lesser extent, unsecured debt and equity investments in middle-market companies. The Company’s investment objective is to maximize the total return to its stockholders in the form of current income and capital appreciation. The Company’s investment activities are managed by its investment adviser, Monroe Capital BDC Advisors, LLC, which is an investment adviser registered under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended, and an affiliate of Monroe Capital LLC. To learn more about Monroe Capital Corporation, visit www.monroebdc.com.

    About Monroe Capital LLC

    Monroe Capital LLC (including its subsidiaries and affiliates, together “Monroe”) is a premier asset management firm specializing in private credit markets across various strategies, including direct lending, technology finance, venture debt, alternative credit, structured credit, real estate and equity. Since 2004, the firm has been successfully providing capital solutions to clients in the U.S. and Canada. Monroe prides itself on being a value-added and user-friendly partner to business owners, management, and both private equity and independent sponsors. Monroe’s platform offers a wide variety of investment products for both institutional and high net worth investors with a focus on generating high quality “alpha” returns irrespective of business or economic cycles. The firm is headquartered in Chicago and maintains 11 offices throughout the United States, Asia and Australia.

    Monroe has been recognized by both its peers and investors with various awards including Inc’s 2024 Founder-Friendly Investors List; Private Debt Investor as the 2023 Lower Mid-Market Lender of the Decade, 2023 Lower Mid-Market Lender of the Year, 2023 CLO Manager of the Year, Americas; Global M&A Network as the 2023 Lower Mid-Markets Lender of the Year, U.S.A.; DealCatalyst as the 2022 Best CLO Manager of the Year; Korean Economic Daily as the 2022 Best Performance in Private Debt – Mid Cap; Creditflux as the 2021 Best U.S. Direct Lending Fund; and Pension Bridge as the 2020 Private Credit Strategy of the Year. For more information and important disclaimers, please visit www.monroecap.com.

    Forward-Looking Statements

    This press release may contain certain forward-looking statements. Any such statements, other than statements of historical fact, are likely to be affected by other unknowable future events and conditions, including elements of the future that are or are not under the Company’s control, and that the Company may or may not have considered; accordingly, such statements cannot be guarantees or assurances of any aspect of future performance. Actual developments and results are highly likely to vary materially from these estimates and projections of the future. Such statements speak only as of the time when made, and the Company undertakes no obligation to update any such statement now or in the future.

    SOURCE: Monroe Capital Corporation

    The MIL Network –

    March 4, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: Volatus Aerospace and Draganfly Expand Collaboration to Service High-Value Geospatial Power Utility Customers

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Toronto, ON and Saskatoon, SK, March 03, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Volatus Aerospace Inc. (TSXV: FLT) (OTCQX:TAKOF) (Frankfurt: ABB) (“Volatus”) and Draganfly Inc. (NASDAQ: DPRO) (CSE: DPRO) (FSE: 3U8A) (“Draganfly”) announced today a strategic collaboration to address rapidly growing global demand for the automation and digitization of geospatial data collection and analysis solutions for Utility Infrastructure. This teaming agreement builds on the previously announced collaboration agreement, harnessing Volatus’ operational and regulatory capabilities, advanced sensor technology and Draganfly’s advanced product, engineering, and integration capabilities.

    This expanded collaboration will engage high-profile global power and infrastructure providers to enhance efficiency and safety in power utility solutions. By combining Volatus’ extensive experience in power utility inspections and right of way management with Draganfly’s product and engineering capabilities, the partnership is positioned to offer a strong competitive advantage to support large Enterprise clients looking for an advanced end to end solution.

    “As the demand for drone-based solutions continues to increase in multiple sectors, strategic collaborations are a key enabler to meet the diverse needs of clients without introducing unnecessary commercial risk,” Glen Lynch, CEO of Volatus Aerospace, stated. “Industries need more than products, they need solutions. By combining Draganfly’s advanced product platform with Volatus’ deep domain expertise and operational and regulatory capabilities, we can provide clients with a complete solution to their challenges.”

    “Partnering with Volatus Aerospace allows us to incorporate our advanced product platform of multiple interoperable drones into a complete solution for power utilities,” Cameron Chell, CEO of Draganfly, commented. “The power utility industry is increasingly seeking advanced, safe, and efficient data acquisition methods, something we have designed from the ground up. This collaboration reinforces our commitment to providing cutting-edge solutions that meet the complex demands of today’s power utilities while enhancing our market reach.”

    In a recent report, MarketsandMarkets estimates that the global market for utility asset management, which includes inspection services among other components, is projected to grow to USD 4.09 billion by 2026. This growth is driven by the increasing investments in grid modernization activities, the need for efficient and reliable power supply, and the integration of renewable energy sources into the grid.

    The collaboration is expected to deliver enhanced value to an identified client(s) that will ultimately contribute to the modernization of infrastructure management.

    About Volatus Aerospace Inc.

    Volatus Aerospace is a leader in innovative global aerial solutions for intelligence and cargo. With a strong foundation of over 100 years of combined institutional knowledge in aviation, Volatus provides comprehensive solutions using both piloted and remotely piloted aircraft systems (RPAS). We serve industries such as oil and gas, utilities, healthcare, and public safety. Our mission is to enhance operational efficiency, safety, and sustainability through cutting-edge, real-world solutions.

    About Draganfly Inc.

    Draganfly Inc. is a pioneer in drone technology and systems, providing quality, cutting-edge UAV solutions, software, and AI systems to revolutionize operations across public safety, agriculture, industrial inspections, defense, and surveying. With over 24 years of innovation, Draganfly is recognized for its commitment to ingenuity, first-class service, and the ability to save time, money, and lives.

    For more information on Draganfly, please visit www.Draganfly.com

    Forward-Looking Statements

    This news release contains statements that constitute “forward-looking information” and “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of applicable securities laws, including statements regarding the plans, intentions, beliefs, and current expectations of the Company with respect to future business activities and operating performance. Often, but not always, forward-looking information and forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of words such as “plans”, “expects”, “is expected”, “budget”, “scheduled”, “estimates”, “forecasts”, “intends”, “anticipates”, or “believes” or variations (including negative variations) of such words and phrases, or statements formed in the future tense or indicating that certain actions, events or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “might” or “will” (or other variations of the foregoing) be taken, occur, be achieved, or come to pass. Forward-looking information includes information regarding: (i) the anticipated benefits of, and estimated revenue to be generated by, the collaboration agreement; (ii) the business plans and expectations of the Company; and (iii) expectations for other economic, business, and/or competitive factors. Forward-looking information is based on currently available competitive, financial, and economic data and operating plans, strategies, or beliefs of management as of the date of this news release, but involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, assumptions and other factors that may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Company to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking information. Such factors may be based on information currently available to the Company, including information obtained from third-party industry analysts and other third-party sources, and are based on management’s current expectations or beliefs. Any and all forward-looking information contained in this news release is expressly qualified by this cautionary statement. Investors are cautioned that forward-looking information is not based on historical facts but instead reflects expectations, estimates or projections concerning future results or events based on the opinions, assumptions and estimates of management considered reasonable at the date the statements are made. Forward-looking information and forward-looking statements reflect the Company’s current beliefs and is based on information currently available to it and on assumptions it believes to be not unreasonable in light of all of the circumstances. In some instances, material factors or assumptions are discussed in this news release in connection with statements containing forward-looking information. Such material factors and assumptions include, but are not limited to: the anticipated benefits and revenues of the agreement to Draganfly; meeting the continued listing requirements of the TSXV and Draganfly meeting the continued listing requirements of the Canadian Securities Exchange and the Nasdaq; and including, but not limited to, those factors set forth in the Company’s Annual Information Form under the section “Risk Factors” and Draganfly’s most recent filings in accordance with securities regulations in Canada on the SEDAR+ website at www.sedarplus.ca. Although the Company has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual actions, events or results to differ materially from those described in forward-looking information, there may be other factors that cause actions, events or results to differ from those anticipated, estimated or intended. The forward-looking information contained herein is made as of the date of this news release and, other than as required by law, the Company disclaims any obligation to update any forward-looking information, whether as a result of new information, future events or results or otherwise. There can be no assurance that forward-looking information will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking information.

    None of the Canadian Securities Exchange, TSXV nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSXV) or the Nasdaq accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this news release.

    TSXV: FLT

    Media Contacts

    Danielle Gagne
    Head of Marketing and Communications, Volatus Aerospace
    +1 833-865-2887
    Danielle.gagne@volatusaerospace.comErika Racicot
    Public Relations, Draganfly
    media@draganfly.com
    Company Contact Email: info@draganfly.com

    The MIL Network –

    March 4, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: Bitfarms Provides February 2025 Production and Operations Update  

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    – Operational hashrate of 16.1 EH/s –
    – Acquisition of Stronghold Digital Mining & sale of Yguazu site on track for Q1 2025 close –
    -Appoints Craig Hibbard to SVP of Infrastructure-

    This news release constitutes a “designated news release” for the purposes of the Company’s second amended and restated prospectus supplement dated December 17, 2024, to its short form base shelf prospectus dated November 10, 2023.

    TORONTO, March 03, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Bitfarms Ltd. (NASDAQ/TSX: BITF), a global Bitcoin and vertically integrated data center company, today issued its latest monthly production report. All financial references are in U.S. dollars.

    CEO Ben Gagnon stated, “We are on track to close our acquisition of Stronghold Digital Mining (“Stronghold”) following the recent successful shareholder vote which Stronghold shareholders voted overwhelmingly in support. Combined with the strategic sale of our 200 MW Yguazu, Paraguay data center, also on track for a Q1 2025 close, these accretive transactions will improve our energy portfolio and transform Bitfarms into a North American energy and compute infrastructure company with lower-cost energy and high-quality assets, suitable for both HPC/AI and Bitcoin mining.

    “In addition, I am thrilled to welcome our new SVP of Infrastructure, Craig Hibbard. Craig joins us from Mawson Infrastructure Group where he was Chief Development Officer. He has over 25 years of experience leading large-scale real estate development projects, including the recent rapid design and construction of over 200 MW of digital infrastructure for a U.S. firm specializing in digital assets and HPC/AI. Based in Pennsylvania, Craig will play a critical role in managing infrastructure development for our rapidly expanding PJM portfolio and advancing our HPC/AI business.”

    SVP of Global Mining Operations Alex Brammer said, “During February we grew our operational hashrate 6% to 16.1 EH/s and grew our average operational hashrate 20% to 13.4 EH/s, achieving new all-time highs in three out of four countries. This growth will continue as we deploy miners in the U.S. and Argentina and optimize performance across all of our data centers.”

    February 2025 Select Operating Highlights

    Key Performance Indicators February 2025 January 2025
    Total BTC earned 213 201
    Month End Operating EH/s 16.1 15.2
    BTC/Avg. EH/s 16 18
    Average Operating EH/s 13.4 11.2
    Energized Capacity (MW) 437 437
    Hydropower (MW) 256 256
    Watts/Terahash Efficiency (w/TH) 20 20
    BTC Sold 75 42
    • 16.1 EH/s operational at February 28, 2025, up 6% M/M.
    • 13.4 EH/s average operational, up 20% M/M.
    • 16 BTC/average EH/s, 11% lower M/M.
    • 213 BTC earned, 6% higher M/M.
    • 7.6 BTC earned daily on average, equal to ~$638,400 per day based on a BTC price of $84,000 at February 28, 2025.

    February 2025 Financial Update

    • Sold 75 of the 213 BTC earned as part of the Company’s regular treasury management practice for total proceeds of $6.5 million.
    • Added 108 BTC, bringing Treasury to 1,260 BTC, up from 1,152 BTC last month and representing $105.8 million based on the Bitcoin price of $84,000 at February 28, 2025. This includes the transfer of 30 BTC to a third party as collateral for active option contracts during the month.

    Upcoming Conferences and Events

    • March 12, 2025: Cantor Fitzgerald Global Technology Conference (NYC)
    • March 17-18, 2025: 37th Annual ROTH Conference (Dana Point, CA)

    About Bitfarms Ltd.

    Founded in 2017, Bitfarms is a global vertically integrated Bitcoin data center company that sells its computational power to one or more mining pools from which it receives payment in Bitcoin. Bitfarms develops, owns, and operates vertically integrated mining facilities with in-house management and company-owned electrical engineering, installation service, and multiple onsite technical repair centers.

    Bitfarms currently has 13 operating Bitcoin data centers, as well as hosting agreements with two data centers, in four countries: Canada, the United States, Paraguay, and Argentina. Powered predominantly by environmentally friendly hydro-electric and long-term power contracts, Bitfarms is committed to using sustainable and often underutilized energy infrastructure.

    To learn more about Bitfarms’ events, developments, and online communities:

    www.bitfarms.com
    https://www.facebook.com/bitfarms/
    https://twitter.com/Bitfarms_io
    https://www.instagram.com/bitfarms/
    https://www.linkedin.com/company/bitfarms/

    Glossary of Terms

    • Y/Y or M/M= year over year or month over month
    • BTC or BTC/day = Bitcoin or Bitcoin per day
    • EH or EH/s = Exahash or exahash per second
    • MW or MWh = Megawatts or megawatt hour
    • GW or GWh= Gigawatts or gigawatt hour
    • w/TH = Watts/Terahash efficiency (includes cost of powering supplementary equipment)
    • HPC/AI = High Performance Computing / Artificial Intelligence
    • Energized capacity= Power available
    • Operational capacity= Power and infrastructure being used for current operations
    • PJM= Pennsylvania- New Jersey- Maryland Interconnection LLC

    Forward-Looking Statements

    This news release contains certain “forward-looking information” and “forward-looking statements” (collectively, “forward-looking information”) that are based on expectations, estimates and projections as at the date of this news release and are covered by safe harbors under Canadian and United States securities laws. The statements and information in this release regarding projected growth, target hashrate, opportunities relating to the Company’s geographical diversification and expansion, the merits of the rebalancing operations to North America and projected growth, the North American energy and compute infrastructure strategy, deployment of miners as well as the timing therefor, closing of the Stronghold acquisition on a timely basis and on the terms as announced, the positive impact of the Stronghold acquisition and the ability to gain access to additional electrical power and grow hashrate of the Stronghold business, the sale of the Yguazu, Paraguay Site and the reinvestment of the proceeds of the sale for growth, opportunities relating to the potential of the Company’s data centers for HPC/AI, performance of the plants and equipment upgrades and the impact on operating capacity including the target hashrate and multi-year expansion capacity, the opportunities to leverage Bitfarms’ proven expertise to successfully enhance energy efficiency and hashrate, the benefits of diversification and other statements regarding future growth, plans and objectives of the Company are forward-looking information. Any statements that involve discussions with respect to predictions, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, assumptions, future events or performance (often but not always using phrases such as “expects”, or “does not expect”, “is expected”, “anticipates” or “does not anticipate”, “plans”, “budget”, “scheduled”, “forecasts”, “estimates”, “prospects”, “believes” or “intends” or variations of such words and phrases or stating that certain actions, events or results “may” or “could”, “would”, “might” or “will” be taken to occur or be achieved) are not statements of historical fact and may be forward-looking information and are intended to identify forward-looking information.

    This forward-looking information is based on assumptions and estimates of management of the Company at the time they were made, and involves known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance, or achievements of the Company to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking information. Such factors include, among others, risks relating to: the construction and operation of the Company’s facilities may not occur as currently planned, or at all; there is no guarantee that the Company will be able to complete the acquisition of Stronghold Digital Mining, Inc. or the sale of the Yguazu, Paraguay Site on the terms as announced, or at all; expansion may not materialize as currently anticipated, or at all; the anticipated merits of the HPC/AI strategy, the benefits and programs of the PJM deregulated market and the objectives of diversification in general may not be realized as planned; efforts to improve and optimize the performance of equipment may not be successful; the digital currency market; the ability to successfully mine digital currency; revenue may not increase as currently anticipated, or at all; it may not be possible to profitably liquidate the current digital currency inventory, or at all; a decline in digital currency prices may have a significant negative impact on operations; an increase in network difficulty may have a significant negative impact on operations; the volatility of digital currency prices; the anticipated growth and sustainability of hydroelectricity for the purposes of cryptocurrency mining in the applicable jurisdictions; the inability to maintain reliable and economical sources of power for the Company to operate cryptocurrency mining assets; the risks of an increase in the Company’s electricity costs, cost of natural gas, changes in currency exchange rates, energy curtailment or regulatory changes in the energy regimes in the jurisdictions in which the Company operates and the adverse impact on the Company’s profitability; future capital needs and the ability to complete current and future financings, including Bitfarms’ ability to utilize an at-the-market offering program ( “ATM Program”) and the prices at which securities may be sold in such ATM Program, as well as capital market conditions in general; share dilution resulting from an ATM Program and from other equity issuances; the risk that a material weakness in internal control over financial reporting could result in a misstatement of the Company’s financial position that may lead to a material misstatement of the annual or interim consolidated financial statements if not prevented or detected on a timely basis; any regulations or laws that will prevent Bitfarms from operating its business; historical prices of digital currencies and the ability to mine digital currencies that will be consistent with historical prices; and the adoption or expansion of any regulation or law that will prevent Bitfarms from operating its business, or make it more costly to do so. For further information concerning these and other risks and uncertainties, refer to the Company’s filings on www.sedarplus.ca (which are also available on the website of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission at www.sec.gov), including the restated MD&A for the year-ended December 31, 2023, filed on December 9, 2024. Although the Company has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in forward-looking statements, there may be other factors that cause results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended, including factors that are currently unknown to or deemed immaterial by the Company. There can be no assurance that such statements will prove to be accurate as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking information. The Company undertakes no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking information other than as required by law . Trading in the securities of the Company should be considered highly speculative. No stock exchange, securities commission or other regulatory authority has approved or disapproved the information contained herein. Neither the Toronto Stock Exchange, Nasdaq, or any other securities exchange or regulatory authority accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

    Additional Information about the Stronghold Acquisition and Where to Find It

    This communication relates to a proposed merger between Stronghold and Bitfarms. In connection with the proposed merger, Bitfarms has filed the registration statement with the SEC. After the registration statement is declared effective, Stronghold will mail the proxy statement/prospectus to its shareholders. This communication is not a substitute for the registration statement, the proxy statement/prospectus or any other relevant documents Bitfarms and Stronghold has filed or will file with the SEC. Investors are urged to read the proxy statement/prospectus (including all amendments and supplements thereto) and other relevant documents filed with the SEC carefully and in their entirety if and when they become available because they will contain important information about the proposed merger and related matters.

    Investors may obtain free copies of the registration statement, the proxy statement/prospectus and other relevant documents filed by Bitfarms and Stronghold with the SEC, when they become available, through the website maintained by the SEC at www sec.gov. Copies of the documents may also be obtained for free from Bitfarms by contacting Bitfarms’ Investor Relations Department at investors@bitfarms.com and from Stronghold by contacting Stronghold’s Investor Relations Department at SDIG@gateway-grp.com.

    No Offer or Solicitation

    This communication is not intended to and does not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy, sell or solicit any securities or any proxy, vote or approval, nor shall there be any sale of securities in any jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful prior to registration or qualification under the securities laws of any such jurisdiction. No offer of securities shall be deemed to be made except by means of a prospectus meeting the requirements of Section 10 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

    Participants in Solicitation Relating to the Stronghold Acquisition

    Bitfarms, Stronghold, their respective directors and certain of their respective executive officers may be deemed to be participants in the solicitation of proxies from Stronghold’s shareholders in respect of the proposed merger. In connection with the proposed merger, Bitfarms has filed with the SEC a registration statement on Form F-4 on December 19, 2024, which includes a proxy statement of Stronghold that also constitutes a prospectus of Bitfarms. This communication may be deemed to be solicitation material in respect of the proposed merger. Additional information regarding the interests of such potential participants, including their respective interests by security holdings or otherwise, will be set forth in the proxy statement/prospectus and other relevant documents filed with the SEC in connection with the proposed merger if and when they become available. These documents are available free of charge on the SEC’s website and from Bitfarms using the sources indicated above.

    Investor Relations Contact:

    Bitfarms
    Tracy Krumme
    SVP, Head of IR & Corp. Comms.
    +1 786-671-5638
    tkrumme@bitfarms.com

    Media Contact: 

    Bitfarms
    Caroline Brady Baker 
    Director, Communications   
    cbaker@bitfarms.com 

    The MIL Network –

    March 4, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: Next Hydrogen Solutions Inc. Announces Changes to its Board of Directors

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    MISSISSAUGA, Ontario, March 03, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Next Hydrogen Solutions Inc. (TSXV: NXH, OTC: NXHSF) (“Next Hydrogen” or the “Company”), announced today the appointment of Adarsh Mehta to the Company’s board of directors (the “Board”). Ms. Mehta will fill the vacancy on the Board resulting from the resignation of Mr. Matthew Fairlie, who resigned from the Board effective January 15, 2025.

    Ms. Mehta is VP of Business Development for Jenner Renewable Consulting. For the past 22 years Ms. Mehta has played a pivotal role in the growth of renewable energy, leading technical reviews, due diligence, and development for over 2,500 megawatts of wind and solar energy projects across North and South America. She served on the Board of Directors of the Canadian Wind Energy Association (CanWEA) from 2008 to 2015, becoming Chairperson in 2011, where she was instrumental in advancing Canada’s wind energy sector.

    “As Next Hydrogen accelerates its position as a large-scale green hydrogen solution provider, we are excited to welcome Adarsh to our board,” said Allan MacKensie, Chairperson of Next Hydrogen. “Her extensive experience in renewable energy, project development, and industry advocacy will be invaluable as we scale our technology and commercialization efforts.”

    “I am thrilled to join Next Hydrogen at such a transformative time,” said Adarsh Mehta. “Green hydrogen is a critical pillar in the global transition to clean energy, and Next Hydrogen is well-positioned to be a leader in this space. I look forward to contributing to the company’s growth and impact.”

    About Next Hydrogen

    Founded in 2007, Next Hydrogen is a designer and manufacturer of electrolyzers that use water and electricity as inputs to generate clean hydrogen for use as an energy source. Next Hydrogen’s unique cell design architecture supported by 40 patents enables high current density operations and superior dynamic response to efficiently convert intermittent renewable electricity into green hydrogen on an infrastructure scale. Following successful pilots, Next Hydrogen is scaling up its technology to deliver commercial solutions to decarbonize transportation and industrial sectors.

    Contact Information

    Raveel Afzaal, President and Chief Executive Officer
    Next Hydrogen Solutions Inc.
    Email: rafzaal@nexthydrogen.com
    Phone: 647-961-6620

    www.nexthydrogen.com

    Neither the TSXV nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSXV) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

    Notice regarding forward-looking statements:

    Certain statements in this press release constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of applicable securities laws. Forward-looking statements are frequently characterized by words such as “plan”, “continue”, “expect”, “project”, “intend”, “believe”, “anticipate”, “estimate”, “may”, “will”, “potential”, “proposed” and other similar words, or statements that certain events or conditions “may” or “will” occur. Forward-looking statements in this press release are based on the current expectations of management of Next Hydrogen. Actual events and conditions could differ materially from those expressed or implied in this press release as a result of known and unknown risk factors and uncertainties affecting Next Hydrogen, including risks regarding the industry in which Next Hydrogen operates, economic factors, the equity markets generally and risks associated with growth and competition. Additional risk factors are also set forth in the Company’s management’s discussion and analysis and other filings available via the System for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval (SEDAR Plus) under Next Hydrogen’s profile at www.sedarplus.ca. Although the Company has attempted to identify certain factors that could cause actual actions, events or results to differ materially from those described in forward-looking statements, there may be other factors that cause actions, events or results to differ from those anticipated, estimated or intended. No forward-looking statement can be taken as guaranteed. The forward-looking information contained in this press release is made as of the date hereof and the Company is not obligated to update or revise any forward-looking information, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by applicable securities laws. Because of the risks, uncertainties and assumptions contained herein, readers should not place any undue reliance on forward looking information.

    The MIL Network –

    March 4, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: Hut 8 Reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2024 Results

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Fortified balance sheet, optimized operations, disciplined growth initiatives, and strategic hires set foundation for 2025

    12,300 MW development pipeline with 2,800 MW under exclusivity as of December 31, 2024

    Earnings Release Highlights

    • Full year 2024 revenue of $162.4 million, net income of $331.4 million, and Adjusted EBITDA of $555.7 million.
    • Fourth quarter 2024 energy cost per megawatt-hour (“MWh”) of $31.63, a 30% decrease from the fourth quarter of 2023.
    • Total energy capacity under management of 1,020 megawatts (“MW”) as of December 31, 2024.
    • 12,300 MW development pipeline with 2,800 MW of capacity under exclusivity as of December 31, 2024.
    • Strategic Bitcoin reserve of 10,171 Bitcoin with a market value of $949.5 million as of December 31, 2024.

    MIAMI, March 03, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Hut 8 Corp. (Nasdaq | TSX: HUT) (“Hut 8” or the “Company”), an energy infrastructure platform integrating power, digital infrastructure, and compute at scale to fuel next-generation, energy-intensive use cases such as Bitcoin mining and high-performance computing, today announced its financial results for the fourth quarter and full year of 2024.

    “In 2024, we delivered on our commitment to operational excellence and bottom-line economics, setting the foundation for disciplined growth in 2025,” said Asher Genoot, CEO of Hut 8. “In the fourth quarter, we fortified our capital strategy and balance sheet—converting our Anchorage loan to equity, launching ATM and stock repurchase programs, and expanding our strategic Bitcoin reserve. Today, we operate from a position of strength as we focus on advancing our 12.3-gigawatt development pipeline.”

    “We believe our platform model will enable us to strategically allocate capital as we aim to optimize returns, mitigate sector-specific volatility, accelerate speed to market, and deliver innovation at every stage of the development value chain. To align our reporting structure with this model as we enter this next phase of growth, we have realigned our operating segments around the three layers of our platform: Power, Digital Infrastructure, and Compute, as reflected in our results.”

    “Looking ahead, we believe our application-agnostic approach to digital infrastructure development and experience in greenfield development will reinforce a structural advantage over peers reliant on single-market exposure or more complex commercialization models. Together with our robust development pipeline and strengthened team, we believe we are well-positioned to meet the continued and rising demand for energy capacity from applications like AI while building a platform positioned to fuel the world’s most transformative technologies for decades to come.”

    2024 Highlights

    Power

    • Generated $56.6 million in full-year revenue, consisting of revenue from Power Generation and Managed Services.
    • Secured Vega, a 205 MW behind-the-meter site in Texas, which is expected to be energized in Q2 2025, less than one year after acquisition, through the Company’s greenfield development capabilities, which enables rapid deployment low-cost Bitcoin mining infrastructure.
    • Advanced three large-scale AI data center development projects, which, if secured, would collectively add over 430 MW of capacity. After the quarter, Hut 8 secured 592 acres of land for its River Bend campus, a project from this subset of its development pipeline.

    Digital Infrastructure

    • Generated $17.5 million in full-year revenue, consisting of revenue from CPU Colocation and ASIC Colocation services.
    • Completed the greenfield development and energization of Salt Creek, a 63 MW Bitcoin mining facility, just over three months after breaking ground for an all-in cost of approximately $240,000 per MW.
    • Developed custom data center architecture for Bitcoin mining ASIC compute. Set for deployment at Vega, the architecture enables rack-based ASIC compute utilizing a custom-designed direct-to-chip (“DTC”) liquid cooling system at densities of up to 180 kilowatts per rack, helping bridge the gap to traditional HPC architecture.
    • Secured a major colocation contract with BITMAIN Technologies Ltd. (“BITMAIN”), the world’s leading manufacturer of digital currency mining servers. The ASIC colocation contract is expected to generate ~$125 million in annualized revenue upon full ramp and includes a purchase option at Hut 8’s discretion for the full ~15 exahash-per-second (“EH/s”) deployment.

    Compute

    • Generated $80.7 million in full-year revenue, consisting of revenue from Bitcoin Mining, GPU-as-a-Service, and Data Center Cloud operations.
    • Partnered with BITMAIN to develop and launch a next-generation ASIC miner. The U3S21EXPH will be the first model mass-commercialized by BITMAIN with DTC cooling within a U form factor.
    • Launched Highrise AI, Inc. (“Highrise”), a wholly-owned subsidiary providing GPU-as-a-Service through an initial five-year customer agreement with an AI cloud services provider. Hut 8 intends to leverage operational data and insights from Highrise to optimize the design, development, and operations of its digital infrastructure as it expands into AI data center development.
    • Executed a purchase agreement for BITMAIN Antminer S21+ miners for the Company’s initial ASIC fleet upgrade, which is expected to increase self-mining hashrate to ~10.3 EH/s while driving average fleet efficiency down to 20.5 joules per terahash (“J/TH”). If the Company were to execute its purchase option under the aforementioned BITMAIN colocation agreement, it anticipates total self-mining hashrate of ~25.1 EH/s with average fleet efficiency of 16.0 J/TH.

    Operations

    • Appointed Asher Genoot as CEO on February 7, 2024.
    • Executed a comprehensive restructuring program to strengthen bottom-line economics, delivering a ~30% reduction in energy cost per MWh and an approximately eight-point increase in gross margin per Bitcoin mined from Q4 2023 to Q4 2024.
    • Expanded team with strategic hires, including Sean Glennan as CFO and Victor Semah as CLO.

    Capital Strategy and Balance Sheet

    • Closed a $150 million strategic investment from Coatue to partner in building AI infrastructure.
    • Converted our $37.9 million Anchorage Digital loan balance to shares of our common stock at a 51% premium to the 20-Day VWAP through the day prior to the signing of the Debt Repayment Agreement.
    • Launched a $500 million ATM program and a $250 million stock repurchase program.
    • Surpassed 10,000 Bitcoin held in reserve with the purchase of approximately 990 Bitcoin, of which 968 were pledged as collateral to BITMAIN as part of an innovative financing model for the purchase of Antminer S21+ miners for our initial fleet upgrade.

    Key Performance Indicators

      Three Months Ended December 31,   Twelve Months Ended December 31,
      2024   2023   2024   2023
    Cost to mine a Bitcoin (excluding hosted facilities)(1)   $ 37,958   $ 17,171   $ 27,959   $ 13,198
    Cost to mine a Bitcoin(2) $ 37,958   $ 20,051   $ 28,161   $ 16,570
    Weighted average revenue per Bitcoin mined(3) $ 82,412   $ 37,313   $ 60,834   $ 29,913
    Bitcoin mined(4)   236     852     1,466     2,789
    Energy cost per MWh $ 31.63   $ 45.47   $ 32.52   $ 40.80
    Hosting cost per MWh $ N/A   $ 65.84   $ 68.72   $ 62.57
    Energy capacity under management (mining)(5)   665 MW     839 MW     665 MW     839 MW
    Total energy capacity under management(6)   1,020 MW     842 MW     1,020 MW     842 MW
    Number of Bitcoin in strategic reserve(7)   10,171     9,195     10,171     9,195
    (1) Cost to mine a Bitcoin (excluding hosted facilities) is equivalent to the all-in electricity cost to mine a Bitcoin at owned facilities and includes our net share of the King Mountain JV.
    (2) Cost to mine a Bitcoin (or weighted average cost to mine a Bitcoin) is calculated as the sum of total all-in electricity expense and hosting expense divided by Bitcoin mined during the respective periods and includes our net share of the King Mountain JV.
    (3) Weighted average revenue per Bitcoin mined is calculated as the sum of total self-mining revenue divided by Bitcoin mined during the respective periods and includes our net share of the King Mountain JV.
    (4) Bitcoin mined includes our net share of the King Mountain JV. Bitcoin mined excluding our net share of the King Mountain JV was 190 and 690 for the three months ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. Bitcoin mined excluding our net share of the King Mountain JV was 1,184 and 2,138 for the twelve months ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively.
    (5) Energy capacity under management (mining) represents the total power capacity related to Bitcoin mining infrastructure, including self-mining sites, colocation agreements, and managed services agreements.
    (6) Total energy capacity under management includes (i) energy capacity under management (mining) and (ii) all energy-related assets including power generation, non-operational sites, and traditional data centers.
    (7) Number of Bitcoin in strategic reserve includes Bitcoin held in custody, pledged as collateral, and pledged for a miner purchase under an agreement with BITMAIN.
       

    Select Fourth Quarter 2024 Financial Results

    U.S. Data Mining Group, Inc. dba US Bitcoin Corp (“USBTC”) and Hut 8 Mining Corp. completed an all-stock merger of equals (the “Business Combination”) on November 30, 2023. USBTC was deemed the accounting acquirer in the transaction and, as a result, the historical figures in the Company’s income statement for the three months ended December 31, 2023 reflect two months of USBTC’s standalone performance and one month of the combined company’s performance. Results for the three months ended December 31, 2024 reflect the performance of the combined company. All financial results are reported in US dollars.

    Revenue for the three months ended December 31, 2024 was $31.7 million compared to $38.9 million in the prior year period, and consisted of $9.9 million in Power revenue, $2.5 million in Digital Infrastructure revenue, $19.2 million in Compute revenue, and $0.1 million in Other revenue. Other consists primarily of equipment sales and repairs.

    Net income for the three months ended December 31, 2024 was $152.0 million compared to $10.6 million for the prior year period. This included gain on digital assets of $308.2 million and $32.8 million for the three months ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively.

    Adjusted EBITDA for the three months ended December 31, 2024 was $310.6 million compared to $48.6 million for the prior year period. A reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to the most comparable GAAP measure, net income (loss), and an explanation of this measure has been provided in the table included below in this press release.

    Select Full Year 2024 Financial Results

    As a result of the Business Combination, the historical figures in the Company’s income statement for the twelve months ended December 31, 2023 reflect eleven months of USBTC’s standalone performance and one month of the combined company’s performance. Results for the twelve months ended December 31, 2024 reflect the performance of the combined company. With respect to the balance sheet, the ending balance for year-end 2024 is being compared to year-end 2023, both of which reflect the combined company’s performance.

    Revenue for the twelve months ended December 31, 2024 was $162.4 million compared to $96.0 million in the prior year, and consisted of $56.6 million in Power revenue, $17.5 million in Digital Infrastructure revenue, $80.7 million in Compute revenue, and $7.6 million in Other revenue. Other consists primarily of equipment sales and repairs.

    Net income for the twelve months ended December 31, 2024 was $331.4 million compared to $21.9 million for the prior year period. This included gain on digital assets of $509.3 million and $32.6 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively.

    Adjusted EBITDA for the twelve months ended December 31, 2024 was $555.7 million compared to $85.7 million for the prior year period. A reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to the most comparable GAAP measure, net income (loss), and an explanation of this measure has been provided in the table included below in this press release.

    Conference Call

    The Hut 8 Corp. Full-Year 2024 Conference Call will commence today, Monday, March 5, 2025, at 8:30 a.m. ET today. Investors can join the live webcast here.

    Supplemental Materials and Upcoming Communications

    The Company expects to make available on its website materials designed to accompany the discussion of its results, along with certain supplemental financial information and other data. For important news and information regarding the Company, including investor presentations and timing of future investor conferences, visit the Investor Relations section of the Company’s website, https://hut8.com/investors, and its social media accounts, including on X and LinkedIn. The Company uses its website and social media accounts as primary channels for disclosing key information to its investors, some of which may contain material and previously non-public information.

    Analyst Coverage

    A full list of Hut 8 Corp. analyst coverage can be found at https://hut8.com/investors/analyst-coverage/.

    Upcoming Conferences & Events

    • March 11–12, 2025: Cantor Crypto, Digital Assets & AI Infrastructure Conference, Miami
    • March 16–18, 2025: 37th Annual ROTH Conference, Dana Point
    • March 25–27, 2025: Mining Disrupt, Fort Lauderdale
    • April 7–8, 2025: Jones Healthcare and Technology Innovation Conference, Las Vegas
    • May 13–15, 2025: J.P. Morgan Global Technology, Media and Communications Conference, Boston
    • May 19–20, 2025: Barclays 15th Annual Emerging Payments and FinTech Forum, New York

    About Hut 8

    Hut 8 Corp. is an energy infrastructure platform integrating power, digital infrastructure, and compute at scale to fuel next-generation, energy-intensive use cases such as Bitcoin mining and high-potential computing. We take a power-first, innovation-driven approach to developing, commercializing, and operating the critical infrastructure that underpins the breakthrough technologies of today and tomorrow. Our platform spans 1,020 megawatts of energy capacity under management across 15 sites in the United States and Canada: five Bitcoin mining, hosting, and Managed Services sites in Alberta, New York, and Texas, five high performance computing data centers in British Columbia and Ontario, four power generation assets in Ontario, and one non-operational site in Alberta. For more information, visit www.hut8.com and follow us on X (formerly known as Twitter) at @Hut8Corp.

    Cautionary Note Regarding Forward–Looking Information

    This press release includes “forward-looking information” and “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Canadian securities laws and United States securities laws, respectively (collectively, “forward-looking information”). All information, other than statements of historical facts, included in this press release that address activities, events, or developments that Hut 8 expects or anticipates will or may occur in the future, including statements relating to the Company’s foundation for disciplined growth; its position of strength; its development pipeline, including the three large-scale AI data center development projects and the expected capacity assuming these projects are secured; its platform model; its ability to strategically allocate capital; its goal of optimizing returns, mitigating sector volatility, accelerating speed to market, and delivering innovation across the development value chain; its next phase of growth; its structural advantage over peers; its ability to meet demand for energy capacity; its expected energization of Vega, including the expected timing and site capabilities; its colocation contract with BITMAIN, including the anticipated revenue and expected hashrate and average fleet efficiency improvements if the Company executes its purchase option under the agreement; the commercialization of the U3S21EXPH miner from BITMAIN, including the expected timing and miner capabilities; the initial Highrise customer agreement; the operational data and insights derived from Highrise for the Company’s planned expansion into AI data center development; its expected ASIC fleet upgrade, including the expected timing and anticipated hashrate and average fleet efficiency improvements; and the Company’s future business strategy, competitive strengths, expansion, and growth of the business and operations more generally, and other such matters is forward-looking information. Forward-looking information is often identified by the words “may”, “would”, “could”, “should”, “will”, “intend”, “plan”, “anticipate”, “allow”, “believe”, “estimate”, “expect”, “predict”, “can”, “might”, “potential”, “predict”, “is designed to”, “likely,” or similar expressions.

    Statements containing forward-looking information are not historical facts, but instead represent management’s expectations, estimates, and projections regarding future events based on certain material factors and assumptions at the time the statement was made. While considered reasonable by Hut 8 as of the date of this press release, such statements are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties, assumptions and other factors that may cause the actual results, level of activity, performance, or achievements to be materially different from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking information, including, but not limited to, failure of critical systems; geopolitical, social, economic, and other events and circumstances; competition from current and future competitors; risks related to power requirements; cybersecurity threats and breaches; hazards and operational risks; changes in leasing arrangements; Internet-related disruptions; dependence on key personnel; having a limited operating history; attracting and retaining customers; entering into new offerings or lines of business; price fluctuations and rapidly changing technologies; construction of new data centers, data center expansions, or data center redevelopment; predicting facility requirements; strategic alliances or joint ventures; operating and expanding internationally; failing to grow hashrate; purchasing miners; relying on third-party mining pool service providers; uncertainty in the development and acceptance of the Bitcoin network; Bitcoin halving events; competition from other methods of investing in Bitcoin; concentration of Bitcoin holdings; hedging transactions; potential liquidity constraints; legal, regulatory, governmental, and technological uncertainties; physical risks related to climate change; involvement in legal proceedings; trading volatility; and other risks described from time to time in Company’s filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. In particular, see the Company’s recent and upcoming annual and quarterly reports and other continuous disclosure documents, which are available under the Company’s EDGAR profile at www.sec.gov and SEDAR+ profile at www.sedarplus.ca.

    Adjusted EBITDA

    In addition to results determined in accordance with GAAP, Hut 8 relies on Adjusted EBITDA to evaluate its business, measure its performance, and make strategic decisions. Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure. The Company defines Adjusted EBITDA as net income (loss), adjusted for impacts of interest expense, income tax provision or benefit, depreciation and amortization, gain on debt extinguishment, gain on derivatives, gain on bargain purchase, our share of unconsolidated joint venture depreciation and amortization, foreign exchange gains or losses, the removal of non-recurring transactions, impairment on assets, gain or loss on sale of property and equipment, loss from discontinued operations, net loss attributable to non-controlling interests, and stock-based compensation expense in the period presented. You are encouraged to evaluate each of these adjustments and the reasons the Company’s board of directors and management team consider them appropriate for supplemental analysis.

    The Company’s board of directors and management team use Adjusted EBITDA to assess its financial performance because it allows them to compare operating performance on a consistent basis across periods by removing the effects of capital structure (such as varying levels of interest expense and income), asset base (such as depreciation and amortization), and other items (such as non-recurring transactions mentioned above) that impact the comparability of financial results from period to period.
    Net income (loss) is the GAAP measure most directly comparable to Adjusted EBITDA. In evaluating Adjusted EBITDA, you should be aware that in the future the Company may incur expenses that are the same as or similar to some of the adjustments in such presentation. The Company’s presentation of Adjusted EBITDA should not be construed as an inference that its future results will be unaffected by unusual or non-recurring items. There can be no assurance that the Company will not modify the presentation of Adjusted EBITDA in the future, and any such modification may be material. Adjusted EBITDA has important limitations as an analytical tool and you should not consider Adjusted EBITDA in isolation or as a substitute for analysis of results as reported under GAAP. Because Adjusted EBITDA may be defined differently by other companies in the industry, the Company’s definition of this non-GAAP financial measure may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies, thereby diminishing its utility.

     
    Hut 8 Corp. and Subsidiaries
    Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss)
    (Unaudited, in USD thousands, except share and per share data)
     
      Three Months Ended   Twelve Months Ended
          December 31,       December 31,
      December 31,   2023   December 31,   2023
    (in USD thousands) 2024      (Unaudited)      2024      (Unaudited)
    Revenue:                      
    Power $ 9,949     $ 7,818     $ 56,602     $ 22,794  
    Digital Infrastructure   2,520       4,455       17,482       8,291  
    Compute   19,159       26,519       80,701       64,851  
    Other   66       110       7,600       110  
    Total revenue   31,694       38,902       162,385       96,046  
                           
    Cost of revenue (exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown below):                  
    Cost of revenue – Power   7,465       1,944       21,538       7,263  
    Cost of revenue – Digital Infrastructure   2,929       3,048       15,556       4,321  
    Cost of revenue – Compute   9,781       15,764       44,977       42,592  
    Cost of revenue – Other   138       20       4,584       18  
    Total cost of revenue   20,313       20,776       86,655       54,194  
                           
    Operating (income) expenses:                      
    Depreciation and amortization   14,308       6,134       47,773       17,537  
    General and administrative expenses   18,844       33,380       72,917       49,133  
    Gains on digital assets   (308,157 )     (32,811 )     (509,337 )     (32,626 )
    Loss (gain) on sale of property and equipment   —       443       (634 )     888  
    Realized gain on sale of digital assets   —       —       —       (2,376 )
    Impairment of digital assets   —       —       —       1,431  
    Impairment – other   4,472       —       4,472       —  
    Legal settlement   —       —       —       (1,531 )
    Total operating (income) expenses   (270,533 )     7,146       (384,809 )     32,456  
    Operating income (loss)   281,914       10,980       460,539       9,396  
                           
    Other (expense) income:                      
    Foreign exchange (loss) gain   (4,042 )     1,002       (5,000 )     1,002  
    Interest expense   (9,563 )     (5,980 )     (29,794 )     (24,933 )
    Gain on debt extinguishment   —       —       5,966       23,683  
    (Loss) gain on derivatives   (13,143 )     —       6,780       —  
    Gain on bargain purchase   3,060       —       3,060       —  
    Equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint venture   1,902       4,098       10,359       12,815  
    Total other (expense) income   (21,768 )     (880 )     (8,629 )     12,567  
                           
    Income from continuing operations before taxes   260,146       10,100       451,910       21,963  
                           
    Income tax (provision) benefit   (110,482 )     482       (113,457 )     (190 )
                           
    Net income from continuing operations $ 149,664     $ 10,582     $ 338,453     $ 21,773  
                           
    Income (Loss) from discontinued operations   2,320             (7,044 )     77  
                           
    Net income   151,984       10,582       331,409       21,850  
    Less: Net loss attributable to non-controlling interests   241       —       473       —  
    Net income attributable to Hut 8 Corp. $ 152,225     $ 10,582     $ 331,882     $ 21,850  
                           
    Net income $ 151,984     $ 10,582     $ 331,409     $ 21,850  
    Other comprehensive loss:                      
    Foreign currency translation adjustments   (46,011 )     10,761       (56,390 )     10,761  
    Total comprehensive income   105,973       21,343       275,019       32,611  
    Less: Comprehensive loss attributable to non-controlling interest 387       —       549       —  
    Comprehensive income attributable to Hut 8 Corp. $ 106,360     $ 21,343     $ 275,568     $ 32,611  


    Adjusted EBITDA Reconciliation

      Three Months Ended   Twelve Months Ended
      December 31,   December 31,      December 31,   December 31,
    (in USD thousands) 2024      2023   2024      2023
    Net income $ 151,984     $ 10,582     $ 331,409     $ 21,850  
    Interest expense   9,563       5,980       29,794       24,933  
    Income tax provision (benefit)   110,482       (482 )     113,457       190  
    Depreciation and amortization   14,308       6,134       47,773       17,537  
    Gain on debt extinguishment   —       —       (5,966 )     (23,683 )
    Loss (gain) on derivatives   13,143       —       (6,780 )     —  
    Gain on bargain purchase   (3,060 )     —       (3,060 )     —  
    Share of unconsolidated joint venture depreciation and amortization (1)   3,120       2,887       21,792       21,016  
    Foreign exchange loss (gain)   4,024       (1,002 )     5,000       (1,002 )
    Loss (gain) on sale of property and equipment   —       443       (634 )     888  
    Non-recurring transactions (2)   327       12,044       (9,882 )     10,513  
    Impairment – other   4,472       —       4,472       —  
    (Income) loss from discontinued operations   (2,320 )     77       7,044       (77 )
    Net loss attributable to non-controlling interests   241       —       473       —  
    Stock-based compensation expense   4,342       11,912       20,783       13,563  
    Adjusted EBITDA $ 310,626     $ 48,575     $ 555,675     $ 85,728  
    (1) Net of the accretion of fair value differences of depreciable and amortizable assets included in equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint venture in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) in accordance with ASC 323. See Note 10. Investment in unconsolidated joint venture of the Consolidated Financial Statements for further detail.
    (2) Non-recurring transactions for the three months ended December 31, 2024 represent approximately $0.2 million of restructuring costs and $0.1M of Far North related costs. Non-recurring transactions for the three months ended December 31, 2023 represent approximately $9.6 million related to a sales tax accrual and $2.4 million of transaction costs related to the Business Combination. Non-recurring transactions for the twelve months ended December 31, 2024 represent approximately $4.0 million of restructuring costs and $1.9 million related to the Far North transaction costs, offset by a $13.5 million contract termination fee received from MARA, and a $2.2 million tax refund. Non-recurring transactions for the twelve months ended December 31, 2023 represent approximately $9.6 million related to a sales tax accrual and $2.4 million of transaction costs related to the Business Combination, partially offset by a gain from a legal settlement of $1.5 million.
       

    Contacts

    Hut 8 Investor Relations
    Sue Ennis
    ir@hut8.com

    Hut 8 Media Relations
    media@hut8.com

    The MIL Network –

    March 4, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: Rethinking Basement Usage: Allstate Canada Data Reveals Water Damage Among Top Claim Reasons

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    MARKHAM, Ontario, March 03, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Basements have evolved from mere storage spaces to integral parts of many homes, now equipped with state-of-the-art entertainment systems, expensive gym equipment and valuable furniture. However, these spaces remain highly susceptible to flooding, potentially leading to costly repairs. Recent data from the Insurance Bureau of Canada highlights 2024 as the most expensive year for severe weather-related losses in our country’s history, with flooding contributing to over $1 billion in losses.

    In fact, Allstate Insurance Company of Canada (Allstate Canada) data reveals that water damage is one of the top reasons customers submit a home insurance claim, and the cost to repair a water-damaged basement has risen by nearly 20 per cent between 2019-2024. According to a recent Léger poll conducted on behalf of Allstate Canada, 80 per cent of Canadians who responded have a basement and one in 10 have experienced basement flooding. The survey also revealed that 61 per cent of responding homeowners have a bathroom, sink or access to running water in their basement, and 55 per cent use their basement to store a spare fridge or freezer. Additionally, 47 per cent have a bedroom, 30 per cent have a home gym or workout area, 23 per cent installed a home theatre system, 20 per cent a home office, and 25 per cent say their basement has a playroom for their children.

    While Canadian homeowners use their basements in different ways, the results of the poll also show that:

    • 41 per cent use their basements to store expensive sports gear such as skis and bikes;
    • Nearly one in three (32 per cent) store home entertainment equipment in their basement;
    • Basements are also commonly the site for priceless possessions, such as photo albums (40 per cent) and family heirlooms (24 per cent);
    • Other items stored in the basement include tools, extension cords and lightbulbs (65 per cent), seasonal items like patio furniture or holiday decorations (59 per cent), furniture (51 per cent), collectibles or memorabilia (31 per cent), important financial, legal or tax documents (28 per cent), computer equipment (23 per cent) and musical instruments (15 per cent).

    Rethinking Home: A New Era for Basements

    “Kitchens are often a central, social part of the home, but basements play an important role as a space to relax with hobbies, store gear between adventures, or to simply unwind,” says Odel Laing, Agency Manager at Allstate Canada. “Homeowners should consider how they can protect these valuable spaces from flooding, which can quickly affect plans as we approach the spring season.”

    Protection and Remodeling Tips

    Flooding typically occurs during warmer weather months, so Laing invites homeowners to consider taking steps to protect their basement and its contents.

    • Elevate high-quality, expensive entertainment systems on stands or hang them up on the wall. Alternatively, keep them on the main floor, if possible.
    • Swap cardboard boxes for plastic ones for storage.
    • Select waterproof cabinetry and shelving.
    • Review your home insurance policy to understand your coverage for water damage.
    • Consult a professional about landscaping opportunities to direct water away from the home’s foundation.
    • Install water or leak detectors compatible with your monitored home security system to notify owners of flooding quickly.
    • If owners are planning to finish or renovate their basement, discuss with your contractor how to best protect from flooding risks.

    For more home flooding-related safety advice, go to the GOOD HANDS® blog at http://blog.allstate.ca/rethink-basement-tips-protect-against-flooding-damage.

    About the Léger poll
    Allstate commissioned Léger to conduct a study among Canadian homeowners to better understand their use of basements, storage habits, flood prevention measures, and overall preparedness for extreme weather events. In order to meet research objectives, an online survey was conducted with 1,000 Canadian homeowners, aged 18 and over, who could express themselves in French or English from January 23 to 27, 2025. It should be noted that due to the non-probabilistic nature of the sample (associated with any web survey), the calculation of the margin of error does not apply. For comparative purposes, a probabilistic sample of 1,000 respondents (web panel) would have a global margin of error of ± 3.1% 19 times out of 20. The margin of error would, however, increase for subgroups.

    About Allstate Insurance Company of Canada
    Allstate Insurance Company of Canada is a leading home and auto insurer focused on providing its customers prevention and protection products and services for every stage of life. Serving Canadians since 1953, Allstate strives to reassure both customers and employees with its “You’re in Good Hands®” promise. Allstate is committed to making a positive difference in the communities in which it operates through partnerships with charitable organizations, employee giving and volunteerism. To learn more, visit www.allstate.ca. For safety tips and advice, visit www.goodhandsadvice.ca.

    For more information, please contact:
    Jessica Hoffeldt
    Agnostic on behalf of Allstate Insurance Company of Canada
    647-269-7438
    jhoffeldt@thinkagnostic.com  

    Maude Gauthier (Quebec only)
    Capital-Image on behalf of Allstate Insurance Company of Canada
    514-915-9469
    mgauthier@capital-image.com

    Cody Gillen
    Public Relations Specialist
    905-475-4536
    cgillen@allstate.ca

    The MIL Network –

    March 4, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: Union Home Minister and Minister of Cooperation Shri Amit Shah says, the Modi government is unsparing in punishing drug traffickers who drag our youth into the dark abyss of addiction for the greed of money

    Source: Government of India

    Union Home Minister and Minister of Cooperation Shri Amit Shah says, the Modi government is unsparing in punishing drug traffickers who drag our youth into the dark abyss of addiction for the greed of money

    As a result of a foolproof investigation with a bottom-to-top and top-to-bottom strategy, 29 drug traffickers have been convicted by the court in 12 different cases across India

    Under the leadership of Prime Minister Shri Narendra Modi, the Government pledges to continue combating the drug menace with ruthless and meticulous investigations to build a drug-free Bharat

    In pursuit to Modi government’s Zero Tolerance policy against drugs, the Narcotics Control Bureau (NCB) has achieved this significant success

    Posted On: 02 MAR 2025 11:33AM by PIB Delhi

    Union Home Minister and Minister of Cooperation Shri Amit Shah said that the Modi Government is unsparing in punishing drug traffickers who drag our youth into the dark abyss of addiction for the greed of money.

    In a post on X platform, Shri Amit Shah said that under the leadership of Prime Minister Shri Narendra Modi, the Government pledges to continue combating the drug menace with ruthless and meticulous investigations to build a drug-free Bharat.

    Home Minister said that as a result of a foolproof investigation with a bottom-to-top and top-to-bottom strategy, 29 drug traffickers have been convicted by the court in 12 different cases across India.

    This success is a testament to the ‘Bottom to Top’ and ‘Top to Bottom’ approach adopted under the leadership of Prime Minister Shri Narendra Modi and the guidance of Union Home Minister Shri Amit Shah. In pursuit to Modi government’s Zero Tolerance policy against drugs, the Narcotics Control Bureau (NCB) has achieved this significant success.

    The details of 12 cases are:

    Ahmedabad Zone

    1.     On 27.07.2019, NCB Ahmedabad Zonal Unit seized 23.859 Kg of Charas at Sabarmati Railway Station, Ahmedabad Gujarat from the possession of Mohd. Rizwan and Mohd. Jishan and a case was registered vide NCB Ahmedabad Crime No 05/2019 and above mentioned two persons were arrested. During the course of investigation, one Sahidul Rehman was arrested. After completion of investigation, a complaint was filed against the above three persons under NDPS Act before the learned Judge at City Civil and Sessions Court Ahmedabad. After completion of trial of the case, the judgment was pronounced by the Court on 29.01.2025 and all the 03 accused persons were convicted for Rigorous Imprisonment for 14 years and a fine of Rs. 01 lakh each.

     

    Bhopal Zone (Mandsaur)

    2.     In July 2022, NCB Mandsaur, intercepted, a Harrier and a Verna on National Highway 43, at Dhruwar Toll Plaza in Shahdol, Madhya Pradesh and seized 123.080 kgs Ganja. Shivam Singh (owner of the seized vehicles), Sant Kumar Yadav, Balmukund Mishra & Uttam Singh (all carrier) were arrested in the case. The consignment was sourced from Koraput (Odisha) and was destined for Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh. The Investigation team further arrested the receiver of contraband named Suresh Kumar Bind. On 24.02.2025, the Special NDPS Court, Shahdol convicted the four accused Shivam Singh, Sant Kumar Yadav, Balmukund Mishra & Uttam Singh and sentenced them to 12 years of rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs 2 lakh each.

    Chandigarh Zone

    3.     A parcel containing two hockey sticks packed with 438 grams of opium was intercepted at DHL Express, Ludhiana, by the officers of NCB Chandigarh. The parcel was booked by accused Nasib Singh, with Gobind Singh accompanying him during the booking. A case NCB Crime No. 06/2024 was registered, and a complaint was filed after investigation. The Special Court, Ludhiana on 31.01.25, has pronounced its verdict and convicted Nasib Singh and Gobind Singh (Head munshi Punjab Police) under Sections 18(c), 23, 28, and 29 of the NDPS Act, 1985, sentencing them accordingly for their role in attempting to transport opium to Canada. The Court sentenced both the convicts with 3 years rigorous imprisonment and a fine of ₹10,000 (in default, one additional month of imprisonment) under NDPS Act.

    4.     On 30.12.2021, NCB Chandigarh Zonal Unit intercepted Bhim Lama at Chandigarh Railway Station, before he could board Paschim Express to Mumbai in possession of 390 grams of Charas. The accused was formally arrested, and upon completion of the investigation, the case was presented before the Special Court. The accused voluntarily confessed to his guilt, leading to his conviction. On 08.01.2025, The Special Court, Chandigarh, convicted Bhim Lama under Section 20 of the NDPS Act, 1985 for possession of 390 grams of Charas. The court, considering the remorse shown by the convict and the non-commercial quantity of the contraband, awarded 6 months of rigorous imprisonment and a fine of ₹5,000 (one additional month of imprisonment in case of default on fine payment) under NDPS Act.

    Cochin Zone

    5.     On 19.06.2021 NCB Cochin intercepted a Zimbabwean lady named Sharon Chigwaza on her arrival at the Cochin International Airport. Sharon Chigwaza was travelling from Johannesburg to Kochi via Doha by Qatar Airways. Further examination of her checked-in luggage led to the recovery and seizure of 2.910kg Heroin. Accordingly, the said lady was arrested and a case OR No. 04/2021 was registered by the NCB Cochin Zonal Unit. On completion of investigation, a complaint bearing SC No. 554/2022 was filed before the District & Sessions Court, Ernakulam.  The trial was conducted before the VII Additional District & Sessions Court, Ernakulam and on completion of the trial, the Court has found Sharon Chigwaza to be guilty of the offences under Sec 8(c) read with 21(c) and 23(c) of NDPS Act, 1985 for possession and illegal import of the seized contraband. In the detailed judgment pronounced on 29.01.2025, the Court has punished the accused with 11 years rigorous imprisonment and fine of Rs.3,00,000/-.

    Dehradun Zone

    6.     On 05.01.2018, NCB Dehradun seized 450 grams of Charas, leading to the arrest of Naman Bansal. Further investigation in the case led to the arrest of one more co-accused person namely of Ashutosh Uniyal, a resident of Dehradun, on  19.02.2018. After completion of trial proceedings, the NDPS Court, Dehradun (UKD) convicted accused Naman Bansal with 01-year RI and with fine of Rs. 20,000/- on 18.01.2025.

    Delhi Zone

    7.     On 19.03,2021, NCB Delhi Zonal Unit seized 1.950 kg of Charas from the possession of two accused persons namely Sahi Ram and Satywan @ Pandit, and arrested them for trafficking of the seized substance. After a thorough investigation, a complaint was filed in the NDPS Court, Jind (Haryana) under NDPS Case No. 11/2021. The Court convicted both the accused to 10 years RI and with fine of Rs. 01 lakh each on 10.01.2025.

     

    Hyderabad Zone

    8.     On 24.02.2021, officers of NCB Hyderabad Zone seized 681.8 Kg Ganja at Pedda Amberpet Toll Plaza on Nehru Outer Ring Road, Hayathnagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. The contraband was being transported in three vehicles: Mahindra Bolero Pick-Up, Honda City, and Swift Dezire from Sileru, Visakhapatnam (Andhra Pradesh) to Pune and Osmanabad via Hyderabad. Eight accused namely Suresh Shyamrao Pawar, Vishal Ramesh Pawar,  Balaji Ramdas Ware,  Manoj Vilas Dhotre,  Dhyaneshwar Lalasaheb Deshmukh , Ramraje Chaturbhuj Gunjale ,  Akshay Anant Gandhi  and  Sachin Dagadu Sanap ,  were arrested and charged for drug trafficking. the Additional District & Sessions Court, Ranga Reddy, convicted all eight accused and sentenced them to 10 years of Rigorous Imprisonment and imposed a fine of ₹1 lakh under the NDPS Act, 1985.

    Indore Zone

    9.     In September 2021, NCB Indore intercepted a truck on National Highway 07 at Alonia Toll Plaza in Seoni, Madhya Pradesh and seized 152.665 kgs Ganja. Mahendra Singh Yadav & Sohail Daud Khan Pathan were arrested in the case. The consignment was sourced from Vishakhapatnam (Andhra Pradesh) and was destined for Jhansi, Uttar Pradesh.  Investigation team further arrested the receiver Suresh Gupta & Co-receiver as well as owner of seized truck Ram Babu Yadav. On 22.02.2025, the Special NDPS Court, Seoni convicted all the four accused and sentenced them to 15 years of rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs 1 lakh each.

    Kolkata Zone

    10.    On 11.07.2020, officers of NCB Kolkata Zone seized 1301 Kgs of Ganja from a TATA 709 Light Goods Vehicle (LGV) bearing Regn No. WB 15 A 3873 at NH12 between Plassey and Krishnanagar near Paglachandi, as per NCB Cr. No. 15/2020. Two accused namely Sahajan Tarafdar and Uttam Debnath were arrested and charged for drug trafficking. The trial continued for over 04 years. On 21.02.2025, the NDPS Spl. Court, Nadia at Krishnanagar convicted the accused Shajahan Tarafdar for 15 years rigorous imprisonment with Rs 1 lakh fine under the NDPS Act, 1985.

    Lucknow Zone

    11.    On 14.02.2022, NCB Lucknow seized 3.1 kilograms of Charas/Hashish from the possession of the accused, Dashrath, son of Devdutt, residing in Chiripur, PS Sirsiya, District Shrawasti, Uttar Pradesh. He was arrested and after investigation a Complaint was filed u/s 8, 20, and 29 of the NDPS Act, 1985. The Additional District Court Shravasti found the accused, Dashrath, ‘Guilty’ of illicit drug trafficking and sentenced him to 15 years of rigorous imprisonment along with a fine of 150,000 rupees on 02.01.2025.

    12.    On 04.01.2024, NCB Lucknow seized 08 kilograms of Opium from the possession of the accused, Dheeraj Kr. Dangi, son of Late Baijnath Dangi, residing in Villlage, Post, &  Police Station- Gidhour, District- Chatra, Jharkhand. He was arrested, and after investigation a Complaint was filed u/s 8, 18, and 29 of the NDPS Act, 1985. The Additional District Court Bareilly found the accused, Dheeraj Kr. Dangi, ‘Guilty’ of illicit drug trafficking and sentenced him to 11 years of rigorous imprisonment along with a fine of 1,00,000 rupees on 21.02.2025.

    These convictions exemplify the NCB’s dedication to ensure successful prosecution of its cases filed before courts. Under the guidance of Union Home Minister and Minister of Coordination, Shri Amit Shah NCB is working relentlessly to realise Prime Minister Shri Narendra Modi ji’s vision of Nasha Mukt Bharat by 2047. NCB seeks support of people in the fight against drugs. Information about drug trafficking can be provided confidentially at NCB’s MANAS Helpline Number 1933.

    The Modi govt is unsparing in punishing drug traffickers who drag our youth into the dark abyss of addiction for the greed of money.

    As a result of a foolproof investigation with a bottom-to-top and top-to-bottom strategy, 29 drug traffickers have been convicted by the court in…

    — Amit Shah (@AmitShah) March 2, 2025

    *****

    RK/VV/ASH/RR/PS

    (Release ID: 2107483) Visitor Counter : 17

    Read this release in: Hindi

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News –

    March 3, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: Valour Expands Digital Asset Offerings with the Launch of Valour Dogecoin, Valour Aptos, Valour Sui, and Valour Render ETPs on Börse Frankfurt in Germany

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    TORONTO, March 03, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — DeFi Technologies Inc. (the “Company” or “DeFi Technologies”) (CBOE CA: DEFI) (GR: R9B) (OTC: DEFTF), a financial technology company that pioneers the convergence of traditional capital markets with the world of decentralised finance (“DeFi”), is pleased to announce that its subsidiary Valour Inc. (“Valour“), a leading issuer of exchange traded products (“ETPs“) that provide simplified access to digital assets, has launched of four new digital asset ETPs on the Börse Frankfurt exchange: Valour Dogecoin (DOGE) EUR ETP, Valour Aptos (APT) EUR ETP, Valour Sui (SUI) EUR ETP, and Valour Render (RENDER) EUR ETP. These new products expand Valour’s commitment to offering investors seamless, secure, and cost-effective exposure to the most innovative digital assets in the market.

    Introducing New ETPs for Emerging Digital Assets

    Valour Dogecoin (DOGE) EUR ETP (ISIN: CH1108679791)

    Dogecoin (DOGE) is one of the most recognized and actively used cryptocurrencies, originally introduced in 2013 as a parody but now serving as a widely adopted digital currency. With a market capitalization of approximately $30.64 billion, DOGE ranks as the 8th largest digital asset globally. It is known for its strong community, fast transaction speeds, and usability for microtransactions, tipping, and merchant payments. The Valour Dogecoin ETP allows investors to gain exposure to DOGE’s performance without the complexities of direct cryptocurrency ownership, featuring a competitive management fee of 1.9%.

    Valour Aptos (APT) EUR ETP (ISIN: CH1108679783)

    Aptos (APT) is a next-generation Layer 1 blockchain designed for scalability, reliability, and security. Powered by its innovative Move programming language, Aptos enables fast transactions and a developer-friendly ecosystem. It is focused on advancing Web3 usability and adoption, providing infrastructure for NFTs, DeFi, and beyond. With a market capitalization of $6.19 billion, Aptos ranks 31st globally among digital assets. The Valour Aptos ETP grants investors seamless exposure to the Aptos blockchain ecosystem.

    Valour Sui (SUI) EUR ETP (ISIN: CH1108679080)

    Sui (SUI) is an innovative blockchain designed for high throughput and instant finality, making it ideal for applications such as gaming and finance. Sui utilizes an object-centric approach that allows for the independent validation of transactions, leveraging a Byzantine fault-tolerant proof-of-stake (PoS) consensus mechanism. With a market capitalization of $28.01 billion, Sui ranks 15th among digital assets worldwide. The Valour Sui ETP provides investors with access to this advanced blockchain, featuring a 1.9% management fee.

    Valour Render (RENDER) EUR ETP (ISIN: CH1108679783)

    Render (RENDER) is the native cryptocurrency of the Render Network, a decentralized GPU-based rendering platform that optimizes computational power for visual effects, gaming, and digital design. The Render Network enables cost-effective and scalable rendering solutions, fostering innovation across the creative industries. With a market capitalization of $2.26 billion, Render ranks 49th globally among digital assets. The Valour Render ETP offers investors exposure to the expanding world of decentralized computing and digital content creation.

    Bringing Innovation to European Investors

    With the introduction of these four new ETPs, Valour continues to expand its portfolio of digital asset investment products, offering European investors diversified and institutional-grade access to the cryptocurrency market. Valour’s ETPs provide a seamless entry point for investors looking to gain exposure to emerging blockchain technologies without the need for direct ownership or complex custody solutions.

    “We are excited to bring Valour Dogecoin, Valour Aptos, Valour Sui, and Valour Render ETPs to the Börse Frankfurt exchange,” said Olivier Roussy Newton, CEO of Valour. “These new listings underscore our commitment to delivering innovative and accessible digital asset investment solutions to the European market. By offering secure and transparent exposure to some of the most promising protocols, we continue to drive the adoption of digital assets among institutional and retail investors alike.”

    “After successfully launching 20 products in the Nordics in December, we are now enhancing our product range in Germany with the most sought-after underlying digital assets. Investor demand for diversified crypto exposure continues to rise, and Aptos, Sui, Render, and Dogecoin stand out as some of the most compelling assets in the market. This launch reinforces our commitment to providing institutional-grade access to the digital asset space, aligned with market trends and investor needs.” said Johanna Belitz, Head of Nordics

    About DeFi Technologies
    DeFi Technologies Inc. (CBOE CA: DEFI) (GR: R9B) (OTC: DEFTF) is a financial technology company that pioneers the convergence of traditional capital markets with the world of decentralized finance (DeFi). With a dedicated focus on industry-leading Web3 technologies, DeFi Technologies aims to provide widespread investor access to the future of finance. Backed by an esteemed team of experts with extensive experience in financial markets and digital assets, we are committed to revolutionising the way individuals and institutions interact with the evolving financial ecosystem. Follow DeFi Technologies on Linkedin and Twitter, and for more details, visit https://defi.tech/  

    About Valour
    Valour Inc. and Valour Digital Securities Limited (together, “Valour”) issues exchange traded products (“ETPs”) that enable retail and institutional investors to access digital assets in a simple and secure way via their traditional bank account. Valour is part of the asset management business line of DeFi Technologies Inc. (CBOE CA: DEFI) (GR: R9B) (OTC: DEFTF). For more information about Valour, to subscribe, or to receive updates, visit valour.com.

    Cautionary note regarding forward-looking information:
    This press release contains “forward-looking information” within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities legislation. Forward-looking information includes, but is not limited to the listing of ETPs; the development and prospects of the underlying digital assets; investor confidence in Valour’s ETPs; investor interest and confidence in digital assets; the regulatory environment with respect to the growth and adoption of decentralized finance and digital assets; the pursuit by the Company and its subsidiaries of business opportunities; and the merits or potential returns of any such opportunities. Forward-looking information is subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the actual results, level of activity, performance or achievements of the Company, as the case may be, to be materially different from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking information. Such risks, uncertainties and other factors include, but is not limited the growth and development of decentralised finance and digital asset sector; rules and regulations with respect to decentralised finance and digital assets; general business, economic, competitive, political and social uncertainties. Although the Company has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in forward-looking information, there may be other factors that cause results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. There can be no assurance that such information will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking information. The Company does not undertake to update any forward-looking information, except in accordance with applicable securities laws.

    THE CBOE CANADA EXCHANGE DOES NOT ACCEPT RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ADEQUACY OR ACCURACY OF THIS RELEASE

    For further information, please contact:

    Olivier Roussy Newton
    Chief Executive Officer
    ir@defi.tech
    (323) 537-7681

    The MIL Network –

    March 3, 2025
  • MIL-Evening Report: Dutton says as PM he would ‘lobby’ Donald Trump to reconsider Ukraine stand

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Michelle Grattan, Professorial Fellow, University of Canberra

    Peter Dutton says if he became prime minister he would lobby US President Donald Trump “to reconsider his position” on Ukraine.

    The opposition leader, who previously rejected Trump’s description of Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky as a “dictator”, has gone further in distancing himself from Trump after the shouting match in the Oval Office, when Trump and Vice President JD Vance berated Zelensky.

    “I was disappointed by the scenes out of the White House,” Dutton told a Monday news conference. “I believe that President Zelensky requires the support of European countries, of the United States, and countries like Australia as well.”

    He said the United States has been “an incredibly important ally” for Australia and he regarded it as a reliable one.

    But making decisions in Australia’s best interests sometimes meant “standing up to your friends and to those traditional allies because our views have diverged.

    “In relation to Ukraine, the Australian view at the moment is different to the United States, and my job as prime minister will be to lobby the president of the United States to reconsider his position in relation to Ukraine. Because I think it’s in all of our collective best interests if we’re able to provide support to Ukraine, and that’s something I’m dedicated to.”

    Dutton’s criticism of Trump is at odds with some in his base and some right wing commentators, who are wedded to Trump, right or wrong.

    Unlike policy on the Middle East, where bipartisanship has broken, both sides of Australian politics have remained firmly behind Ukraine from the start of the war. There is no sign of the bipartisanship being under pressure.

    Australia has supplied Ukraine with about $1.5 billion worth of assistance, of which $1.3 billion is military aid.

    Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, speaking at the start of Monday’s cabinet’s meeting, reiterated Australia’s strong backing for the embattled country in its war with Russia.

    “We regard this as an issue of doing what’s right, but also what is in Australia’s national interest.

    “The brave people of Ukraine, led so extraordinarily by President Zelensky, are fighting not just for their national sovereignty and for their democracy. They are fighting for the international rule of law.

    “And it is an easy choice that Australia has made.”

    On Sunday Treasurer Jim Chalmers said “I think President Zelensky is a hero”.

    Dutton on Monday used similar language. “President Zelensky is a modern-day hero. He’s a war hero and he deserves support.”

    On another front – Australia’s bid to avoid the US tariffs on aluminium and steel – while there is bipartisanship, the opposition is from time to time critical of the government’s handling of the issue.

    Shadow finance minister Jane Hume said on Monday: “The Coalition wholeheartedly supports the government’s efforts to make sure that these tariffs are not imposed by the US.

    “We would hope that the government will pull out all stops here in order to make sure that Australia’s national interests, our economic interests, are protected. I do note that Anthony Albanese is the only member of the Quad, which is one of our most important diplomatic relationships with the US, that hasn’t met directly with Donald Trump yet.”

    The new tariffs are due to come into effect on March 12.

    Australia has been further alarmed by an article published late last week by Trump’s trade advisor, Peter Navarro.

    Navarro wrote: “Consider Australia. Its heavily subsidised smelters operate below cost, giving them an unfair dumping advantage, while Australia’s close ties to China further distort global aluminium trade”.

    “Australia and Canada represent frontal assaults on our aluminium markets.”

    Michelle Grattan does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    – ref. Dutton says as PM he would ‘lobby’ Donald Trump to reconsider Ukraine stand – https://theconversation.com/dutton-says-as-pm-he-would-lobby-donald-trump-to-reconsider-ukraine-stand-251256

    MIL OSI Analysis – EveningReport.nz –

    March 3, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: Nokia partners with Carrix to introduce private wireless solutions in key U.S. container terminals #MWC25

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Press Release
    Nokia partners with Carrix to introduce private wireless solutions in key U.S. container terminals #MWC25

    • Nokia DAC helps Carrix enhance operations at several leading marine terminals in the United States.

    3 March 2025
    Espoo, Finland – Carrix, one of the world’s leading independent marine terminal and rail yard operators, is partnering with Nokia to introduce Nokia DAC, a private wireless solution to help enhance the company’s operations at several leading marine terminals in the United States, including in Jacksonville, Florida; Long Beach, California; Oakland, California; and Seattle, Washington.

    Founded in 1949, Carrix operates more than 250 terminal facilities and rail yards in the United States, Canada, Mexico, Central America, South America, and Asia.

    Nokia DAC underpins Carrix’s operations providing highly reliable wireless connectivity built for the company’s industrial marine terminal environments, while enhancing security, providing greater scalability, and building a foundation for future digital innovations.

    Nokia is the leading global vendor of private wireless solutions to enterprises, with 850 customers in asset-intensive industries such as mining, manufacturing, and ports.

    Hugh Gallagher, Director of IT Services at Carrix, said: “Nokia DAC has greatly improved our network security, performance, and reliability while also simplifying the maintenance and support needed to sustain technical operations effectively. Simply put, the reliability provided by Nokia DAC has enhanced our efficiency and advanced our technology initiatives.”

    Harsha Bhat, Head of Enterprise Campus Edge Global Accounts at Nokia, said: “The marine terminals industry faces complex challenges to improving connectivity and security in asset-intensive industries. Nokia Edge Compute and AI platform for industrial sites provides private wireless connectivity as a digital foundation to quickly introduce new use cases and applications, driving innovation and collaboration in the port while ensuring data sovereignty and security.”

    Multimedia, technical information and related news
    Web Page: Port terminal operations | Nokia DAC
    Product Page: DAC private wireless | Nokia DAC

    About Nokia
    At Nokia, we create technology that helps the world act together. 

    As a B2B technology innovation leader, we are pioneering networks that sense, think and act by leveraging our work across mobile, fixed and cloud networks. In addition, we create value with intellectual property and long-term research, led by the award-winning Nokia Bell Labs, which is celebrating 100 years of innovation.

    With truly open architectures that seamlessly integrate into any ecosystem, our high-performance networks create new opportunities for monetization and scale. Service providers, enterprises and partners worldwide trust Nokia to deliver secure, reliable and sustainable networks today – and work with us to create the digital services and applications of the future.

    About Carrix
    Carrix and its subsidiary SSA Marine are among the world’s leading independent, privately held marine terminal operators, with activities at more than 250 terminal facilities and rail yards in the U.S., Canada, Mexico, Central America, South America, and Asia. Its subsidiary, Tideworks Technology, offers innovative technology solutions for the transportation industry. Founded in 1949, Carrix has continuously expanded its global footprint while always prioritizing customer interests, and now employs more than 20,000 people worldwide.

    Media inquiries
    Nokia Press Office
    Email: Press.Services@nokia.com

    Follow Nokia on social media
    LinkedIn X Instagram Facebook YouTube

    The MIL Network –

    March 3, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: Brookfield Wealth Solutions Launches in the United Kingdom

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    BROOKFIELD, NEWS, March 03, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Brookfield Wealth Solutions (NYSE, TSX: BNT) is entering the UK insurance market to focus on delivering bulk annuity solutions for UK pension schemes. This follows a comprehensive approval process carried out by the Prudential Regulation Authority (“PRA”) and the Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”).

    Brookfield Wealth Solutions will bring its capital and strong track record of servicing policyholders from its substantial North American operations as one of the first new entrants in the UK market. With over £500 billion of demand for pension buyouts expected over the next decade, the UK represents a significant opportunity to grow, create employment and invest domestically in the UK market.

    The entry for Brookfield Wealth Solutions, which was spun out of Brookfield Corporation in June 2021, will further extend Brookfield’s presence in the UK, where it is already a leading investor with over £63 billion of assets under management across infrastructure, real estate, and renewable power. Brookfield and its UK portfolio companies employ approximately 23,000 people across the UK.

    Sachin Shah, CEO, Brookfield Wealth Solutions said: “We are thrilled to launch Brookfield Wealth Solutions in the UK. With more than $140 billion in total assets, we look forward to serving the retirement needs of UK pensioners for the long term. Our group-wide commitment is to provide long-term financial security for our policyholders and clients, serviced by strong, well capitalized companies with high quality investment portfolios. The PRA and the FCA have been efficient, professional and highly constructive during our approval process, and we look forward to working further with them in the future.”

    Brookfield Wealth Solutions is expected to begin operations later in the first quarter subject to final regulatory approvals and will operate under the Blumont Annuity UK brand.

    About Brookfield Wealth Solutions

    Brookfield Wealth Solutions Ltd. (NYSE, TSX: BNT) is focused on securing the financial futures of individuals and institutions through a range of retirement services, wealth protection products and tailored capital solutions. Each class A exchangeable limited voting share of Brookfield Wealth Solutions is exchangeable on a one-for-one basis with a class A limited voting share of Brookfield Corporation (NYSE, TSX: BN). For more information, visit bnt.brookfield.com.

    About Blumont Annuity UK

    Blumont Annuity Company UK Ltd., based in London, will be a provider of bulk annuity solutions in the United Kingdom.

    For more information, please contact:
     
    Media:   Investor Relations:
    Kerrie McHugh   Rachel Schneider
    Tel: (212) 618-3469   Tel: (416) 369-3358
    Email: kerrie.mchugh@brookfield.com   Email: Rachel.schneider@brookfield.com
         

    Notice to Readers

    This news release and any related oral statements made by our representatives may contain “forward-looking information” within the meaning of Canadian provincial securities laws, “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Canadian provincial securities laws, “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and “safe harbor” provisions of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and in any applicable Canadian securities regulations (collectively, “forward-looking statements”). Forward-looking statements include statements that are predictive in nature, depend upon or refer to future results, events or conditions, and include, but are not limited to, statements which reflect management’s current estimates, assumptions and expectations regarding the operations, business, financial condition, expected financial results, performance, prospects, opportunities, priorities, targets, goals, ongoing objectives, strategies, capital management and outlook of Brookfield Wealth Solutions and its subsidiaries, including Blumont Annuity UK, as well as the outlook for international economies for the current fiscal year and subsequent periods.

    In some cases, forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of the words such as “believes,” “thinks,” “expects,” “potential,” “anticipates,” “plans,” “believes,” “estimates,” “seeks,” “intends,” “targets,” “projects,” “foresees,” “forecasts,” or negative versions thereof and other similar expressions, or future or conditional verbs such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “would” and “could.” In particular, the forward-looking statements contained in this news release include statements regarding the growth of our business, the status of regulatory approvals including the anticipated timing thereof, the size of the UK pension market and opportunities relating thereto.

    Although we believe that our anticipated future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements and information are based upon reasonable estimates, assumptions and expectations, the reader should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements and information because they involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are beyond our control, which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of Brookfield Wealth Solutions or Blumont Annuity UK to differ materially from anticipated future results, performance or achievement expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements and information.

    Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contemplated or implied by forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to: (i) investment returns that are lower than target; (ii) the impact or unanticipated impact of general economic, political and market factors in the countries in which we do business; (iii) the behavior of financial markets, including fluctuations in interest and foreign exchange rates; (iv) global equity and capital markets and the availability of equity and debt financing and refinancing within these markets (v) litigation; (vi) changes in tax laws; (vii) ability to collect amounts owed; (viii) catastrophic events, such as earthquakes, hurricanes and epidemics/pandemics; (ix) the possible impact of international conflicts and other developments including terrorist acts and cyberterrorism; (x) the introduction, withdrawal, success and timing of business initiatives and strategies; (xi) the failure of effective disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls over financial reporting and other risks; (xii) health, safety and environmental risks; (xiii) the maintenance of adequate insurance coverage; (xiv) the existence of information barriers between certain businesses within Brookfield’s asset management operations; (xv) risks specific to our business segments; (xvi) factors detailed from time to time in our documents filed with the securities regulators in Canada and the United States; and (xvii) the failure to obtain and/or maintain required regulatory approvals.

    We caution that the foregoing list of important factors that may affect future results is not exhaustive and other factors could also adversely affect its results. Readers are urged to consider the foregoing risks, as well as other uncertainties, factors and assumptions carefully in evaluating the forward-looking information and are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking information. Except as required by law, Brookfield Wealth Solutions undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements or information, whether written or oral, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

    Past performance is not indicative nor a guarantee of future results. There can be no assurance that comparable results will be achieved in the future, that future investments will be similar to the historic investments discussed herein, that targeted returns, growth objectives, diversification or asset allocations will be met or that an investment strategy or investment objectives will be achieved (because of economic conditions, the availability of investment opportunities or otherwise).

    Readers are urged to consider the foregoing risks, as well as other uncertainties, factors and assumptions carefully in evaluating the forward-looking information and are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking information.

    The MIL Network –

    March 3, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: VAALCO Energy, Inc. Acquires 70% Interest in and Becomes Operator of Offshore Côte D’Ivoire CI-705 Block

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    HOUSTON, March 03, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — VAALCO Energy, Inc. (NYSE: EGY; LSE: EGY) (“Vaalco” or the “Company”) announced that it has farmed into the CI-705 block offshore Côte d’Ivoire. Vaalco will become operator of the block with a 70% working interest and a 100% paying interest though a commercial carry arrangement and is partnering with Ivory Coast Exploration Oil & Gas SAS and PETROCI. The CI-705 block is located in the prolific Tano basin and is approximately 70 kilometers (“km”) to the west of Vaalco’s CI-40 Block, where the Baobab and Kossipo oil fields are located, and 60 km west of ENI’s recent Calao discovery. Block CI-705 covers approximately 2,300 km2 and is lightly explored with three wells drilled to date on the block. The water depth across the block ranges from zero to 2,500 meters. Vaalco has invested $3 million to acquire its interest in the new block which it believes has significant prospectivity.

    “We are very excited to expand our footprint offshore Côte d’Ivoire,” said George Maxwell, Vaalco’s Chief Executive Officer. “When we announced our entry into country in 2024 as a non-operating partner in the CI-40 block, we noted our excitement to be expanding our West African focus in a well-established and investment-friendly country. We believe the CI-705 block is favorably located in a proven petroleum system, near existing infrastructure with access to a strong growing domestic market with attractive upside potential. Under the terms of the farm-in, we will operate the block with a 70% working interest and a 100% paying interest as we carry our partners at commercial terms through the seismic reprocessing and interpretation stages and potentially drilling up to two exploration wells. Our initial assessment is that there are both oil and natural gas prospects on the block and we plan to conduct a detailed, integrated geological analysis to assess and mature our understanding of the block’s overall prospectivity. We have demonstrated our ability to acquire, develop and enhance value with the accretive acquisitions we have executed in the past. We are also excited about the major projects that we have planned in 2025 and 2026, which are expected to deliver a step-change in organic growth across our portfolio. We are pleased to have yet another opportunity to add value and runway for Vaalco’s future.”

    Source: Vaalco Energy

    About Vaalco

    Vaalco, founded in 1985 and incorporated under the laws of Delaware, is a Houston, Texas, USA based, independent energy company with a diverse portfolio of production, development and exploration assets across Gabon, Egypt, Côte d’Ivoire, Equatorial Guinea, Nigeria and Canada.

    For Further Information

       
    Vaalco Energy, Inc. (General and Investor Enquiries) +00 1 713 543 3422
    Website: www.vaalco.com 
       
    Al Petrie Advisors (US Investor Relations) +00 1 713 543 3422
    Al Petrie / Chris Delange  
       
    Buchanan (UK Financial PR) +44 (0) 207 466 5000
    Ben Romney / Barry Archer Vaalco@buchanan.uk.com 
       

    Forward Looking Statements

    This press release includes “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, which are intended to be covered by the safe harbors created by those laws and other applicable laws and “forward-looking information” within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities laws. Where a forward-looking statement expresses or implies an expectation or belief as to future events or results, such expectation or belief is expressed in good faith and believed to have a reasonable basis. All statements other than statements of historical fact may be forward-looking statements. The words “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “forecast,” “outlook,” “aim,” “target,” “will,” “could,” “should,” “may,” “likely,” “plan” and “probably” or similar words may identify forward-looking statements, but the absence of these words does not mean that a statement is not forward-looking. Forward-looking statements in this press release include, but are not limited to, statements relating to (i) estimates of future drilling, production, sales and costs of acquiring crude oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids; (ii) expectations regarding Vaalco’s ability to effectively integrate assets and properties it has acquired as a result of the Svenska acquisition into its operations; (iii) expectations regarding future exploration and the development, growth and potential of Vaalco’s operations, project pipeline and investments, and schedule and anticipated benefits to be derived therefrom; (iv) expectations regarding future acquisitions, investments or divestitures; (v) expectations of future balance sheet strength; and (vi) expectations of future equity and enterprise value.

    Such forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, which could cause actual results to differ materially from future results expressed, projected or implied by the forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to: risks relating to any unforeseen liabilities of Vaalco; the ability to generate cash flows that, along with cash on hand, will be sufficient to support operations and cash requirements; risks relating to the timing and costs of completion for scheduled maintenance of the FPSO servicing the Baobab field; and the risks described under the caption “Risk Factors” in Vaalco’s 2023 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 15, 2024 and subsequent Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC.

    Inside Information

    This announcement contains inside information as defined in Regulation (EU) No. 596/2014 on market abuse which is part of UK domestic law by virtue of the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 (“MAR”) and is made in accordance with the Company’s obligations under article 17 of MAR. The person responsible for arranging the release of this announcement on behalf of Vaalco is Matthew Powers, Corporate Secretary of Vaalco.

    A photo accompanying this announcement is available at https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/0ca96dfc-9a1c-4e43-a010-fc63848983f2

    The MIL Network –

    March 3, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: Manora Drilling Update

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    SINGAPORE, March 03, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Valeura Energy Inc. (TSX:VLE, OTCQX:VLERF) (“Valeura” or the “Company”) is pleased to announce the successful completion of an infill drilling campaign at the Manora field in Licence G1/48 (70% operated working interest), offshore Gulf of Thailand.

    Dr. Sean Guest, President and CEO commented:

    “Our most recent drilling at Manora has both increased oil production rates and successfully appraised additional targets which will form the basis of future infill development drilling.  While the Manora field accounts for only about 10% of our year-to-date production, it is an excellent example of the potential for Gulf of Thailand fields to add many years of economic field life through targeted ongoing activity.  In 2025 we intend to pursue a full year of drilling operations across our portfolio, aimed at continuing our proven track record of adding reserves year on year to support continued cash flow generation.” 

    Valeura drilled a five well programme, comprised of three production-oriented infill development wells and two appraisal wells.  In aggregate, the Company’s Manora field working interest share oil production before royalties has increased from 2,144 bbls/d (December 2024 average) to 2,866 bbls/d for the last 14-day period.  Additionally, the appraisal objectives of the campaign have yielded between three and five potential future drilling targets, which will be further evaluated for inclusion in a future drilling programme.

    The A34 well was drilled for infill development targets within the deep 600-series sands in the field’s eastern fault block.  The well was successful and has been completed as a multi-zone comingled producer.

    The horizontal A38 well was also drilled into the eastern fault block, with the objective of developing the shallower 300-series sands.  It was completed as a producer, with the well design incorporating an innovative downhole autonomous inflow control device (“ICD”) to manage water vs oil production.  The Company is monitoring the impact of this, and other ICDs deployed elsewhere on its fields, to optimise the application of this technology across the portfolio.

    The A36 well targeted sands across several known producing intervals in the field’s main fault block and has been completed as a multi-zone infill development well.  As is normal in many multi-zone wells, only the deepest targets are currently producing and the shallower zones will be brought on production later.

    The A35 well successfully appraised several zones of interest within the shallower 300-series sands.  While this appraisal well will not be used a producer (and accordingly has been plugged and abandoned), the results encountered have indicated the potential for three further development wells within this reservoir section, which will now be further studied and modelled for inclusion in future development drilling.

    The horizontal A37 well was drilled as a combination appraisal and development well.  The well encountered an encouraging appraisal target in the 500-series sands, which is now being matured for inclusion in a future drilling campaign.  The well’s development target, within the deeper 600-series sands was completed as a producer.

    Following completion of the Manora drilling campaign, the Company’s contracted drilling rig has mobilised to Licence B5/27 (100% operated interest) where it is currently conducting a drilling programme on the Jasmine C wellhead platform.

    For further information, please contact:  
       
    Valeura Energy Inc. (General Corporate Enquiries)                       
    Sean Guest, President and CEO
    Yacine Ben-Meriem, CFO
    Contact@valeuraenergy.com 
    +65 6373 6940
       
    Valeura Energy Inc. (Investor and Media Enquiries)                       
    Robin James Martin, Vice President, Communications and Investor Relations
    IR@valeuraenergy.com
    +1 403 975 6752 / +44 7392 940495
       

    Contact details for the Company’s advisors, covering research analysts and joint brokers, including Auctus Advisors LLP, Canaccord Genuity Ltd (UK), Cormark Securities Inc., Research Capital Corporation, and Stifel Nicolaus Europe Limited, are listed on the Company’s website at www.valeuraenergy.com/investor-information/analysts/.

    About the Company

    Valeura Energy Inc. is a Canadian public company engaged in the exploration, development and production of petroleum and natural gas in Thailand and in Türkiye. The Company is pursuing a growth-oriented strategy and intends to re-invest into its producing asset portfolio and to deploy resources toward further organic and inorganic growth in Southeast Asia. Valeura aspires toward value accretive growth for stakeholders while adhering to high standards of environmental, social and governance responsibility.

    Additional information relating to Valeura is also available on SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.ca.

    Advisory and Caution Regarding Forward-Looking Information

    Certain information included in this news release constitutes forward-looking information under applicable securities legislation. Such forward-looking information is for the purpose of explaining management’s current expectations and plans relating to the future. Readers are cautioned that reliance on such information may not be appropriate for other purposes, such as making investment decisions. Forward-looking information typically contains statements with words such as “anticipate”, “believe”, “expect”, “plan”, “intend”, “estimate”, “propose”, “project”, “target” or similar words suggesting future outcomes or statements regarding an outlook.

    Forward-looking information in this news release includes, but is not limited to, the potential for successfully appraised targets to form the basis of further infill development drilling, and the number of future drilling targets; the Company’s intention to pursue a full year of drilling operations across its portfolio in 2025; and the Company’s expectation to bring shallower zones on production later in the A36 well.  In addition, statements related to “reserves” and “resources” are deemed to be forward-looking information as they involve the implied assessment, based on certain estimates and assumptions, that the resources can be discovered and profitably produced in the future. 

    Although the Company believes the expectations and assumptions reflected in such forward-looking information are reasonable, they may prove to be incorrect.

    Forward-looking information is based on management’s current expectations and assumptions regarding, among other things: political stability of the areas in which the Company is operating; continued safety of operations and ability to proceed in a timely manner; continued operations of and approvals forthcoming from governments and regulators in a manner consistent with past conduct; ability to achieve extensions to licences in Thailand and Türkiye to support attractive development and resource recovery; future drilling activity on the required/expected timelines; the prospectivity of the Company’s lands; the continued favourable pricing and operating netbacks across its business; future production rates and associated operating netbacks and cash flow; decline rates; future sources of funding; future economic conditions; the impact of inflation of future costs; future currency exchange rates; interest rates; the ability to meet drilling deadlines and fulfil commitments under licences and leases; future commodity prices; the impact of the Russian invasion of Ukraine; the impact of conflicts in the Middle East; royalty rates and taxes; management’s estimate of cumulative tax losses being correct; future capital and other expenditures; the success obtained in drilling new wells and working over existing wellbores; the performance of wells and facilities; the availability of the required capital to funds its exploration, development and other operations, and the ability of the Company to meet its commitments and financial obligations; the ability of the Company to secure adequate processing, transportation, fractionation and storage capacity on acceptable terms; the capacity and reliability of facilities; the application of regulatory requirements respecting abandonment and reclamation; the recoverability of the Company’s reserves and contingent resources; future growth; the sufficiency of budgeted capital expenditures in carrying out planned activities; the impact of increasing competition; the availability and identification of mergers and acquisition opportunities; the ability to successfully negotiate and complete any mergers and acquisition opportunities; the ability to efficiently integrate assets and employees acquired through acquisitions; global energy policies going forward; international trade policies; future debt levels; and the Company’s continued ability to obtain and retain qualified staff and equipment in a timely and cost efficient manner. In addition, the Company’s work programmes and budgets are in part based upon expected agreement among joint venture partners and associated exploration, development and marketing plans and anticipated costs and sales prices, which are subject to change based on, among other things, the actual results of drilling and related activity, availability of drilling, offshore storage and offloading facilities and other specialised oilfield equipment and service providers, changes in partners’ plans and unexpected delays and changes in market conditions. Although the Company believes the expectations and assumptions reflected in such forward-looking information are reasonable, they may prove to be incorrect.

    Forward-looking information involves significant known and unknown risks and uncertainties. Exploration, appraisal, and development of oil and natural gas reserves and resources are speculative activities and involve a degree of risk. A number of factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated by the Company including, but not limited to: the ability of management to execute its business plan or realise anticipated benefits from acquisitions; the risk of disruptions from public health emergencies and/or pandemics; competition for specialised equipment and human resources; the Company’s ability to manage growth; the Company’s ability to manage the costs related to inflation; disruption in supply chains; the risk of currency fluctuations; changes in interest rates, oil and gas prices and netbacks; the risk that the Company’s tax advisors’ and/or auditors’ assessment of the Company’s cumulative tax losses varies significantly from management’s expectations of the same; potential changes in joint venture partner strategies and participation in work programmes; uncertainty regarding the contemplated timelines and costs for work programme execution; the risks of disruption to operations and access to worksites; potential changes in laws and regulations, including international treaties and trade policies; the uncertainty regarding government and other approvals; counterparty risk; the risk that financing may not be available; risks associated with weather delays and natural disasters; and the risk associated with international activity. See the most recent annual information form and management’s discussion and analysis of the Company for a detailed discussion of the risk factors.

    Certain forward-looking information in this news release may also constitute “financial outlook” within the meaning of applicable securities legislation. Financial outlook involves statements about Valeura’s prospective financial performance or position and is based on and subject to the assumptions and risk factors described above in respect of forward-looking information generally as well as any other specific assumptions and risk factors in relation to such financial outlook noted in this news release. Such assumptions are based on management’s assessment of the relevant information currently available, and any financial outlook included in this news release is made as of the date hereof and provided for the purpose of helping readers understand Valeura’s current expectations and plans for the future. Readers are cautioned that reliance on any financial outlook may not be appropriate for other purposes or in other circumstances and that the risk factors described above or other factors may cause actual results to differ materially from any financial outlook.

    The forward-looking information contained in this news release is made as of the date hereof and the Company undertakes no obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking information, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, unless required by applicable securities laws. The forward-looking information contained in this news release is expressly qualified by this cautionary statement.

    This news release does not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy securities in any jurisdiction, including where such offer would be unlawful. This news release is not for distribution or release, directly or indirectly, in or into the United States, Ireland, the Republic of South Africa or Japan or any other jurisdiction in which its publication or distribution would be unlawful.

    Neither the Toronto Stock Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the Toronto Stock Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this news release.

    This information is provided by Reach, the non-regulatory press release distribution service of RNS, part of the London Stock Exchange. Terms and conditions relating to the use and distribution of this information may apply. For further information, please contact rns@lseg.com or visit www.rns.com.

    The MIL Network –

    March 3, 2025
  • MIL-OSI China: UK PM announces new 1.6B-pound deal for Ukraine

    Source: China State Council Information Office 3

    British Prime Minister Keir Starmer (L) shakes hands with visiting Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in front of 10 Downing Street in London, Britain, March 1, 2025. [Photo/Xinhua]

    British Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced on Sunday that Britain will allow Ukraine to use 1.6 billion pounds (2 billion U.S. dollars) of British export finance to purchase more than 5,000 air defense missiles.

    “This will be vital for protecting critical infrastructure and strengthening Ukraine,” Starmer told a press conference following a summit with Western leaders in London.

    The goal is “to put Ukraine in the strongest position” so the country can negotiate from a position of strength, he added.

    Western leaders, including more than a dozen European heads of state and Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, gathered in London on Sunday for a defense summit aimed at advancing a peace plan for Ukraine.

    Starmer said leaders at the summit had agreed on a four-step plan to guarantee peace in Ukraine: to maintain military aid to Ukraine while the conflict continues and increase economic pressure on Russia; to ensure that any lasting peace guarantees Ukraine’s sovereignty and security, with Ukraine at the table for any negotiations; to deter “any future invasion by Russia” in the event of a peace deal; and to establish a “coalition of the willing” to defend Ukraine and uphold peace in the country.

    The leaders also agreed to meet again soon to sustain the momentum behind these efforts, Starmer said.

    The prime minister reaffirmed Britain’s commitment to supporting the peace plan with “boots on the ground, and planes in the air.”

    “Europe must do the heavy lifting,” he said, emphasizing that the agreement needs U.S. backing.

    “Let me be clear, we agree with Trump on the urgent need for a durable peace. Now we need to deliver together,” he said.

    Earlier on Sunday before the summit, Starmer announced that Britain, France and Ukraine will work on a ceasefire plan to present to the United States. He named three essential points to achieve “lasting peace” — a strong Ukraine, a European element with security guarantees, and a U.S. backstop, with the last one being the subject of “intense” discussion.

    The summit took place amid diplomatic tensions, following a heated exchange earlier this week between Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and U.S. President Donald Trump at the White House, which led to the cancellation of an anticipated raw materials agreement between the two countries.

    On Saturday, Zelensky met with Starmer at 10 Downing Street, where the British prime minister reaffirmed the UK’s “unwavering determination” to achieve lasting peace in Ukraine. Following the meeting, Ukrainian Finance Minister Serhiy Marchenko announced that Britain and Ukraine had agreed on a loan of 2.26 billion pounds to support Ukraine’s defense capabilities. (1 pound = 1.26 U.S. dollar)

    MIL OSI China News –

    March 3, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Australia: Australia’s energy transition: capitalising on global investment shifts post-US election

    Source: Allens Insights

    An increasingly complex global environment 13 min read

    Within hours of his inauguration on 20 January 2025, President Trump signed almost 100 executive orders and issued several memorandums and announcements. These included a wind-back of the Inflation Reduction Act (the IRA), withdrawal from The Paris Agreement, halting approvals for new offshore wind farm projects, fast-tracking approval processes for fossil fuels and implementing tariffs on Canada, China and Mexico, some of which were subsequently paused.

    It is early days, so there is limited evidence as to whether this will result in a meaningful change to actual investment allocations in sectors such as renewable energy, but it certainly demonstrates that the global investment environment is becoming increasingly complex, and we believe there is potential for some portion of capital to be redirected away from the US.

    While a potential global reallocation of debt and equity capital and other key energy transition resources such as labour and equipment may be advantageous for a number of countries, the extent to which Australia will be able to capitalise on these opportunities will be tested by the many existing challenges that remain and need to be solved.

    In this Insight, we reflect on the potential consequences of recent policy changes in the US following the re-election of the Trump administration and how this may impact the energy transition in Australia.

    Key takeaways

    • The winding back of the Inflation Reduction Act and other renewables policies under the new US administration may lead to a global redirection of capital away from the US to other jurisdictions, with the reallocation of key resources such as labour and materials easing global supply chain pressures in some pockets.
    • Features specific to Australia’s clean energy market, including our debt and equity markets, and supportive legislative environment may be attractive to certain classes of investors seeking to reallocate capital that was previously earmarked for the US.
    • Similarly, certain local projects experiencing challenges with labour and materials shortages will welcome the potential redistribution and freeing up of such resources.
    • However, the upcoming federal election adds uncertainty to the future direction of Australia’s clean energy policy. Anti-ESG sentiment, fuelled by the renewed emphasis of this theme from the US, may have a further chilling effect on investor confidence.
    • In addition to political uncertainties, Australia’s energy transition continues to face domestic challenges such as approval and connection delays, skilled labour and materials shortages (which are not easily solved even if there is a global redistribution of such resources), and a slow transmission infrastructure build-out. These challenges need to be addressed to fully attract inbound capital.
    • While recognising the very real ongoing local challenges, on the global stage Australia will still be viewed as an attractive investment destination for renewable energy, including relative to the US and parts of Europe. The competitive advantages that are specific to the Australian renewables sector will help Australia compete for the redirection of global capital flows.

    Recent policy changes in the US

    The new US administration has wasted no time in implementing executive orders with the intention of sending policy signals and directing investment in the energy industry in the US in the short to medium term. While the policy situation in the US continues to change on a daily basis, key policies and actions that are expected to directly curb investment in the renewable energy industry in the US are:

    Winding back of the IRA

    Trump’s ‘Unleashing American Energy’ executive order pauses the disbursement of funds allocated under the IRA. This will have direct impacts on existing and planned energy transition projects, including Australian investment into the US in areas such as hydrogen.

    While the IRA is not expected to be fully repealed given a number of projects benefiting from the IRA are in Republican states, the change in stance under the new administration certainly represents a significant shift in direction, given that—up until the commencement of the new administration—the IRA was widely promoted as the single biggest climate investment in US history, with more than US$369 billion of government spending earmarked for energy transition projects, including a vast range of renewable energy technologies. Indeed, it is estimated that as at January 2025, the IRA in its previous form had attracted nearly US$500 billion of investment in low carbon energy and domestic manufacturing, with private investment exceeding public spending by five to six fold.1

    Offshore wind ban

    The withdrawal by President Trump of the Offshore Continental Shelf (OCS) from wind energy leasing is anticipated to create major hurdles for the offshore wind industry in the US. The terms of the withdrawal will mean new offshore wind projects are unlikely to get off the ground, as they will not be able to get leases on the OCS. Projects with existing leases may also be at risk of review, which may result in revisions to the sizing of such leases, or even their cancellation.

    Drill, baby drill

    Trump’s energy strategy pivots away from the clean energy initiatives under the Biden administration towards a prioritisation of oil and gas. Through a number of executive orders, President Trump has decreased regulatory roadblocks to new oil and gas projects, expanded the areas in which hydrocarbon exploration can take place, restarted approval processes for LNG export projects and initiated a renewed push for the adoption of fracking across the US mainland.

    As a result, the US will immediately become a more attractive destination for oil and gas companies to deploy capital and develop new projects. This is in distinct contrast to the Australian investment landscape. Despite the change in the discourse relating to gas that we’ve seen over the past few years, with both the federal and various state governments now publicly calling out the role of gas as an important part of the energy transition, new projects are still facing long delays in securing approvals and opposition from community groups.

    Anti-ESG investment sentiment

    All of these and many other actions and policies under the new US administration have contributed to a further rise in anti-ESG investment sentiment. Globally, and in part as a possible reaction to that sentiment, we have seen major financial institutions and asset managers pulling back from public net zero and other climate-related commitments.

    Australia’s clean energy investment landscape

    Australia’s clean energy landscape is likely to be influenced by a number of global shifts arising from key US policy changes, including the global reallocation of debt and equity capital, disruption and redistribution of supply chains, key materials and labour, and a changing political environment and public sentiment.

    While these shifts may, in some respects, be positive for Australian clean energy projects and investment, our energy transition continues to face significant challenges. The impact on energy policy following a possible change in federal government is significant, with uncertainty around whether a number of the key initiatives pursued over the past few years will continue. These include the Rewiring the Nation initiative, which funds the construction of new transmission infrastructure, and the offshore wind industry which is underpinned by federal legislation. Of course, there is then the issue of the Coalition’s nuclear policy and how this might impact the direction of the energy market in Australia.

    In addition to this sovereign risk, Australia continues to grapple with significant approval delays and transmission connection issues for energy transition projects, preventing developers from fully capitalising on the opportunity to attract capital. We will cover these issues in more detail in future Insights in this series.

    Many of the orders and policies under the Trump administration are expected to:

    • present significant hurdles for new projects in the US (particularly in the renewable energy sector and generation projects both onshore and offshore);
    • create or exacerbate delays and challenges for certain existing US projects, some of which may be shelved or abandoned completely; and
    • increase political and social complexity and scrutiny of investment policies that are explicitly linked to decarbonisation or climate-related targets.

    In particular, the winding back of the IRA is expected to result in capital of up to US$80 billion being diverted away from the US.2 Should this eventuate, a huge global reallocation of capital can be expected to occur, potentially creating new opportunities for certain segments and projects in the Australian energy sector.

    Emerging technologies and non-traditional revenue structures

    While Australia benefits from a mature, sophisticated and liquid project finance market, for certain clean energy projects, such as those involving newer and emerging technologies or non-traditional revenue profiles (like hydrogen, batteries and other storage assets), there is often a need for support from a range of traditional and non-traditional funding sources. These can include government lender support or private debt providers who may be willing to provide greater flexibility in their terms for certain projects that are higher up the risk curve given their different investment mandates and risk appetite.

    The capital expected to ‘free up’ as a result of a more challenging investment environment in the US will come from a wide range of sources, including commercial banks, private debt lenders and funds. With strong existing liquidity in the Australian project finance bank debt market, we see opportunities for non-traditional lenders, particularly private debt lenders who may be looking to reallocate their investment, to increase their participation in the Australian energy market, especially on projects involving emerging technologies or with non-traditional revenue profiles. We may see more of those types of lenders providing standalone funding or supplementing and sitting alongside traditional bank debt and government funding on certain clean energy projects.

    This activity may be facilitated by other current features of the Australian market, such as the RBA recently starting a gradual easing cycle on interest rates, as well as industry-specific features that support new project development and funding, such as legislated emissions reduction targets, and government-led funding and revenue underwriting initiatives, at both a federal and state level, such as the Commonwealth Capacity Investment Scheme and NSW’s Electricity Infrastructure Roadmap for renewable energy zones and Long Term Energy Services Agreements. It remains to be seen what effect the Australian election outcome may have on federal energy policy, and we have already seen a shift in Queensland in terms of government support for energy transition-related targets and projects.

    M&A activity and expansion of energy platform investment

    On the equity side, for similar reasons noted earlier, we anticipate that Australia should be viewed as a relatively attractive jurisdiction for increased investment from equity investors who may be pulling back their investment allocations in projects in the US. In the Australian context, potential increased equity interest from investors looking for scale and diversification may further drive the proliferation of energy platforms and portfolios. This is a major trend that has proven to be highly attractive and viable for sponsors in the local market across the past 12-24 months, leading to a number of platforms and portfolios becoming available in the pipeline and seeking to be connected with equity and debt capital providers. Investors with more specific asset or technology-based mandates may also look to increase their investment in sectors that have proven to be increasingly bankable, such as the utility-scale batteries sector or, depending on their investment mandate, sectors involving more emerging technologies.

    The extent to which these potential opportunities will result in a net benefit for Australia will be tested by a number of existing sector challenges. These include political uncertainty and a possible pullback by certain investors from the sector generally in the context of heightened scrutiny from stakeholders around ‘environmental agendas’. We have also seen a retreat by certain investors from some technologies such as utility-scale solar, and there are, of course, the pain points with permitting, connection, access and social licence affecting all projects. All of these factors lessen competition for assets, placing downward pressure on returns and presenting issues for Australia as an investment destination for capital seeking a home.

    The significant hurdles, delays and other challenges for renewable energy projects in the US, combined with more general measures such as tariffs, leading to potential trade wars, are expected to significantly disrupt supply chains, key materials and labour. Looking at some of Australia’s existing challenges under these themes, we anticipate that there may be upside for certain segments of the clean energy industry.

    Labour and supply chain opportunities

    The redistribution of resources such as labour and equipment that is no longer required for projects in the US may present opportunities for Australian projects such as solar, wind and storage, as well as facilitating the buildout of transmission infrastructure. Shortages in skilled labour and materials have been a key hurdle facing Australia’s ambitious pipeline of energy development projects and transmission infrastructure buildout. Key equipment and components for energy projects are in high demand globally. Production slots for these items can be booked out years in advance and prices have continually been increasing. Program timing for these large-scale projects is critical, with delays resulting in projects losing their position in the queue for both key components and grid access, which is contributing to cost overruns and blowouts.

    While there is no easy solution to existing supply chain problems, we expect that a redistribution of supply of material, transportation and labour resources away from the US may provide some assistance with overcoming these challenges.

    Offshore wind sector

    The sweeping actions taken by the Trump administration raise serious concerns for the offshore wind industry in the US. From a global perspective, it will mean a huge volume of such development projects may be withdrawn from the US or delayed for some time. In addition to the associated equity and debt investment that will no longer be deployed for those projects and will therefore need to be reallocated, this also means key resources such as contractors, suppliers and operators, as well as key materials, transportation and components, which were previously committed to that project pipeline, will become available globally. The freeing up of some of these resources may assist to address existing shortages in the Australian offshore industry.

    This redistribution presents opportunities for Australia, in particular when we consider some of the current regulatory and policy settings already in place for our offshore wind industry. While still in its early stages, the federal and Victorian governments have been at the forefront of developing an offshore wind market in Australia, with the introduction of an offshore electricity licensing framework at a federal level and a clear policy direction from the Victorian Government outlining its offshore wind targets.

    That said, the offshore wind industry in Australia is still very much in its infancy, and the progress that has been made under current Labor governments at the state level is at risk of being paused or wound back should we see a change of federal government at the upcoming election.

    The substantial shift in stance that the new US administration has taken on energy policy has heightened criticism of energy investment from certain political and social voices and, relatedly, has contributed to a general anti-ESG and anti-woke narrative.

    This increases the complexity of the investment environment surrounding the energy sector globally. In Australia, we see this potentially amplifying certain political and social licence challenges, but will not necessarily be a significant detractor from opportunities for the energy transition in Australia given that, as an investment destination, it remains attractive relative to other parts of the world.

    Emboldening political and community challengers

    We expect to see key planning and environment approvals required under federal and state legislation remaining a challenge for developers, both in terms of delays in securing those approvals and increasingly stringent assessment requirements and conditions once those approvals have been obtained.

    This may be exacerbated depending on the outcome of the upcoming federal election this year. The Coalition has taken a considerably stronger stance against renewables generally, and this may be further fuelled by the renewed emphasis on anti-ESG investing and anti-woke sentiment from the US. For example, we have seen the federal opposition’s recent announcement of its intention to revoke the Southern Ocean Offshore Wind Zone if elected, criticism from federal opposition leader, Peter Dutton, of ‘woke’ bankers who refuse lending to certain sectors on environmental grounds and a promise that, if elected, the opposition would unwind emissions reporting rules that came into effect on 1 January.

    Similarly, we may see community opposition and social licence challengers emboldened by that anti-ESG and anti-woke narrative. In the context of the build-out of generation and transmission projects, this may result in even more protracted stakeholder consultation and negotiations with underlying tenure owners, as well as legal challenges to approved and operating projects.

    Green lending and investment policies

    There is increased complexity and uncertainty around ESG investment and, as part of that, renewable energy investment. As discussed earlier, the political climate in the US has contributed to this and that climate is potentially emboldening certain local political players to more explicitly support policies that curb renewables investment. It may be that we see Australian businesses feeling pressure to follow what we have seen globally in terms of businesses withdrawing or distancing themselves from explicit climate-related commitments. However, we see limited evidence and rationale that this alone will drive a substantive diversion of capital away from the renewables sector, especially where the investment case for projects is commercially and scientifically compelling.

    Further, while we have seen certain anti-woke and anti-ESG sentiment echoed in Australia and specifically in the renewable sector, this has not been at the same level of intensity as in the US and so, from that perspective, it is another consideration for investors who are seeking to redeploy capital that was previously committed to US renewables projects, when assessing Australia as a relatively appealing destination.

    That said, shifts in sentiment against ESG agendas will certainly add to the already growing scrutiny from corporate, political and community stakeholders, and this may become more pronounced should there be a change of government at the next election. Against this backdrop, to ensure the Australian renewables sector can capitalise on the potential opportunities presented by the global reallocation of capital and resources, it has never been more important to demonstrate a compelling investment case to equity and debt investors. Crucially, this will involve continued work to overcome the many industry, community and project-level hurdles in the sector.

    Looking to the future

    Despite these local challenges, there remain many reasons why Australia should still be viewed as an attractive investment destination for renewable energy. The advantages Australia has in terms of its stable legal and political system (including bipartisan support for 2050 net zero targets and significant government support for industry at both state and federal level) and its vast, high quality renewable energy sources will continue to bolster Australia’s ability to compete for global capital flows.

    MIL OSI News –

    March 3, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Security: New Edinburgh — Missing Person: Help the RCMP find Keith Bromley

    Source: Royal Canadian Mounted Police

    Meteghan RCMP is asking for the public’s assistance in locating 94-year-old Keith Bromley, who was last seen March 2 at 1:30 p.m. on Riverside Road in New Edinburgh.

    Bromley is described as 5 foot 7 inches and a slight build. He has white and green eyes. He was last seen wearing a black sweater and red/black checkered jacket. He is driving a grey coloured 2017 Hyundai Santa Fe, Nova Scotia license plate FHH-902.

    When someone goes missing, it has deep and far-reaching impacts for the person and those who know them. We ask that people spread the word through social media respectfully.

    Anyone with information on the whereabouts of Keith Bromley is asked to contact the Meteghan RCMP at 902-645-2326. To remain anonymous, call Nova Scotia Crime Stoppers, toll-free, at 1-800-222-TIPS (8477), submit a secure web tip at www.crimestoppers.ns.ca, or use the P3 Tips app.

    Note: A photo of Keith Bromley is attached.

    MIL Security OSI –

    March 3, 2025
  • MIL-OSI China: UK PM announces new 1.6-bln-pound deal for Ukraine to buy missiles

    Source: China State Council Information Office

    British Prime Minister Keir Starmer (L) shakes hands with visiting Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in front of 10 Downing Street in London, Britain, March 1, 2025. [Photo/Xinhua]

    British Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced on Sunday that Britain will allow Ukraine to use 1.6 billion pounds (2 billion U.S. dollars) of British export finance to purchase more than 5,000 air defense missiles.

    “This will be vital for protecting critical infrastructure and strengthening Ukraine,” Starmer told a press conference following a summit with Western leaders in London.

    The goal is “to put Ukraine in the strongest position” so the country can negotiate from a position of strength, he added.

    Western leaders, including more than a dozen European heads of state and Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, gathered in London on Sunday for a defense summit aimed at advancing a peace plan for Ukraine.

    Starmer said leaders at the summit had agreed on a four-step plan to guarantee peace in Ukraine: to maintain military aid to Ukraine while the conflict continues and increase economic pressure on Russia; to ensure that any lasting peace guarantees Ukraine’s sovereignty and security, with Ukraine at the table for any negotiations; to deter “any future invasion by Russia” in the event of a peace deal; and to establish a “coalition of the willing” to defend Ukraine and uphold peace in the country.

    The leaders also agreed to meet again soon to sustain the momentum behind these efforts, Starmer said.

    The prime minister reaffirmed Britain’s commitment to supporting the peace plan with “boots on the ground, and planes in the air.”

    “Europe must do the heavy lifting,” he said, emphasizing that the agreement needs U.S. backing.

    “Let me be clear, we agree with Trump on the urgent need for a durable peace. Now we need to deliver together,” he said.

    Earlier on Sunday before the summit, Starmer announced that Britain, France and Ukraine will work on a ceasefire plan to present to the United States. He named three essential points to achieve “lasting peace” — a strong Ukraine, a European element with security guarantees, and a U.S. backstop, with the last one being the subject of “intense” discussion.

    The summit took place amid diplomatic tensions, following a heated exchange earlier this week between Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and U.S. President Donald Trump at the White House, which led to the cancellation of an anticipated raw materials agreement between the two countries.

    On Saturday, Zelensky met with Starmer at 10 Downing Street, where the British prime minister reaffirmed the UK’s “unwavering determination” to achieve lasting peace in Ukraine. Following the meeting, Ukrainian Finance Minister Serhiy Marchenko announced that Britain and Ukraine had agreed on a loan of 2.26 billion pounds to support Ukraine’s defense capabilities. (1 pound = 1.26 U.S. dollar) 

    MIL OSI China News –

    March 3, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Canada: Prime Minister Justin Trudeau meets with Prime Minister of the United Kingdom Sir Keir Starmer

    Source: Government of Canada – Prime Minister

    Today, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau met with the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, Sir Keir Starmer, on the margins of the Securing our Future Summit in London, United Kingdom, where European partners and Canada met to discuss security for Europe and Ukraine.

    The leaders discussed the importance of a just and lasting peace in Ukraine. They underscored that Ukraine must be part of any negotiations for a peace deal as well as the need for robust security guarantees.

    Prime Minister Trudeau and Prime Minister Starmer highlighted the close relationship between Canada and the United Kingdom, founded on deep historical links, common values, and strong economic relations. They agreed to stay in close contact.

    Associated Links

    MIL OSI Canada News –

    March 3, 2025
  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Chair’s Statement: Leaders Meeting on Ukraine, London, 2 March 2025

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    News story

    Chair’s Statement: Leaders Meeting on Ukraine, London, 2 March 2025

    Chair’s Statement from the Leaders Meeting on Ukraine in London on 2 March 2025.

    Today, I hosted counterparts from across Europe including Türkiye, as well as the NATO Secretary General and the Presidents of the EU Commission, EU Council and Canada, in London to discuss our support for Ukraine.

    Together, we reaffirmed our determination to work for a permanent peace in Ukraine, in partnership with the United States. Europe’s security is our responsibility above all.  We will step up to this historic task and increase our investment in our own defence.

    We must not repeat the mistakes of the past when weak deals allowed President Putin to invade again.  We will work with President Trump to ensure a strong, just, and lasting peace that ensures Ukraine’s future sovereignty and security. Ukraine must be able to deter and defend itself against future Russian attack. There must be no talks on Ukraine without Ukraine. We have agreed that the UK, France and others will work with Ukraine on a plan to stop the fighting which we will discuss further with the US and take forward together.

    Equally importantly, we discussed further rapid steps to enhance our support for Ukraine in pursuit of ‘peace through strength’. We will step up our military support, ensuring Ukraine has the support it needs to train its armed forces and accelerating our support in areas of greatest need. To help bring President Putin to the table, we will put further pressure on Russia by increasing sanctions, including on Russia’s energy revenues, while tightening enforcement of existing measures.

    We also agreed that Ukraine must have robust security arrangements in place at the time of any future peace deal so that Russia does not invade again.  We will accelerate plans to build up Ukraine’s own armed forces and border defences after any deal, and ensure that Ukraine can draw on munitions, finance and equipment to defend itself.

    In addition, many of us expressed readiness to contribute to Ukraine’s security, including through a force consisting of European and other partners, and will intensify our planning.

    We will continue to work closely together to drive forward next steps, and will take decisions in the coming weeks.

    Share this page

    The following links open in a new tab

    • Share on Facebook (opens in new tab)
    • Share on Twitter (opens in new tab)

    Updates to this page

    Published 2 March 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom –

    March 3, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Canada: Standing united in support of Ukraine

    Source: Government of Canada – Prime Minister

    For over three years, Ukraine has fought with extraordinary courage and resilience against Russia’s illegal, full-scale invasion. This ongoing aggression is not only a violation of Ukraine’s sovereignty, but also a direct attack on the rules-based international order, freedom, and democracy everywhere. Canada remains steadfast in its support for Ukraine and its people as they continue to defend their independence.

    The Prime Minister, Justin Trudeau, today participated in the Securing our Future Summit in London, United Kingdom. Hosted by the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, Sir Keir Starmer, the Summit brought together Euro-Atlantic and NATO leaders to promote unity, reinforce collective security, and reaffirm our unwavering commitment to Ukraine in the face of Russia’s continued aggression.

    During the Securing our Future Summit, the Prime Minister announced new sanctions against 10 individuals and 21 entities, including paramilitary organizations and their leaders, to help counter Russia’s reliance on third-party organizations and countries to advance its political and military objectives in Ukraine. To date, Canada has imposed sanctions on over 3,000 individuals and entities complicit in Russia’s aggression – and we remain committed to working with our partners to increase economic pressure on Russia.

    Throughout the Summit, the Prime Minister engaged with his counterparts on the future of international support for Ukraine, emphasizing the urgent need for continued and co-ordinated action in the face of growing global instability and uncertainty. Together, the leaders agreed that there can be no sustainable peace in Europe without security for Ukraine, that any peaceful end to the conflict must include Ukraine at the negotiating table, and that any peace deal should include robust security guarantees.

    At a plenary session, Prime Minister Trudeau underlined that strengthening security and stability in Ukraine and the Euro-Atlantic region will remain a top priority for Canada, including as part of our G7 Presidency this year. He underscored our leadership in supporting Ukraine since the beginning of Russia’s full-scale invasion in 2022, which includes almost $20 billion in multifaceted assistance ranging from military aid – such as armoured vehicles and drone technology – to humanitarian and financial assistance to help Ukraine rebuild and recover.

    The Prime Minister highlighted the ongoing work of members of the Canadian Armed Forces in the United Kingdom and Poland under Operation UNIFIER. Since 2015, they have provided military training to over 44,000 Ukrainian troops. Canada continues to engage closely with Ukraine, Allies, and partners on how best to enhance support through Operation UNIFIER to help Ukraine defend itself.

    Prime Minister Trudeau also emphasized the importance of standing together to hold Russia accountable for its violations of international law, including war crimes, crimes against humanity, and the illegal deportation of Ukrainian children.

    Canada’s commitment to Ukraine is unwavering. We will continue to stand with Ukraine and work closely with our Allies to provide the necessary military, economic, and humanitarian support to push back against Russian aggression. We are stronger when we work together. And together, we can ensure Ukraine is able to defend itself, rebuild, and secure a just and lasting peace.

    Quote

    “Ukraine’s fight for sovereignty is a fight for freedom and democracy everywhere. The important discussions we had today reinforced our shared resolve: as Allies, we will remain steadfast in our support for Ukraine. Canada will be there for Ukraine until there is a just and lasting peace. Slava Ukraini!”

    Quick Facts

    • In London, the Prime Minister held a bilateral meeting with the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, Sir Keir Starmer. Before returning to Canada tomorrow, he will also have an audience with His Majesty King Charles III.
    • The new sanctions announced today include nine leaders of post-Wagner paramilitary organizations, one member of the affiliated senior Russian military leadership, nine paramilitary organizations operating in Ukraine and in the Kremlin’s Africa-network, and 12 affiliated organizations that are responsible for resource extraction within this network.
    • Since the beginning of 2022, Canada has committed almost $20 billion in multifaceted support to Ukraine. This includes:
      • Over $12.4 billion in direct financial assistance, the highest in the G7 on a per capita basis.
      • $4.5 billion in military assistance, such as M777 howitzers, Leopard 2 main battle tanks, armoured combat support vehicles, hundreds of thousands of rounds of ammunition, high-resolution drone cameras, thermal clothing, body armour, fuel, and more.
      • $585 million in development assistance, including support to Ukraine’s energy system.
      • $372.2 million in humanitarian assistance, including support for emergency health interventions, protection services, and essentials such as shelter, water, sanitation, and food. Programming also addresses child protection, mental health support, and prevention and response to sexual and gender-based violence.
      • Nearly $225 million in security and stabilization assistance.
    • As announced by the Prime Minister in Kyiv last month, Canada has started delivering on its commitment of a $5 billion contribution toward the G7 Extraordinary Revenue Acceleration (ERA) Loans mechanism. Launched at last year’s G7 Summit in Apulia, Italy, the ERA Loans aim to bring forward future revenues from frozen Russian sovereign assets to provide Ukraine with approximately US$50 billion in additional funding as it continues to defend its freedom, sovereignty, and territorial integrity.
    • In February 2024, Prime Minister Trudeau and President Zelenskyy signed the historic Agreement on Security Cooperation between Canada and Ukraine, establishing a new strategic security partnership between our two countries. This included $3.02 billion in critical financial and military support to Ukraine for 2024.
    • Launched by Canada and Ukraine in 2024, the International Coalition for the Return of Ukrainian Children co-ordinates joint efforts and co-operation between Ukraine and partner states to address the issue of the unlawful deportation and forced transfer of Ukrainian children by Russia. To date, 41 states and the Council of Europe have joined the Coalition, helping successfully facilitate the safe return of over 1,000 children.
    • As part of the 2024 Fall Economic Statement, the federal government announced last year its intention to double down on our efforts to support Ukraine, including through proposed legislative changes that will ensure profits from frozen Russian assets are used to rebuild Ukraine.
    • Since the start of Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, Canada has welcomed more than 220,000 Ukrainians. We are helping Ukrainian families find a safe, temporary home and have put support services in place for their arrival. This includes temporary financial assistance and access to federally funded settlement services, such as language training and employment-related services.
    • Canada and Ukraine have long been steadfast partners and close friends. In 1991, Canada became the first Western country to recognize Ukraine’s independence. Today, 1.3 million people of Ukrainian descent call Canada home – the largest Ukrainian diaspora in the Western world. In 2022, total bilateral trade between our two countries was valued at over $421 million.
    • This was Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s 11th official visit to the United Kingdom.
    • Canada and the United Kingdom share a strong relationship rooted in deep historical ties and common values. We work closely together to advance shared priorities, including sustainable growth, rules-based international trade, gender equality, the fight against climate change, democracy and media freedom, and support for Ukraine.
    • In 2023, the United Kingdom was Canada’s third-largest destination for goods and services exports, with trade valued at $47 billion.

    Associated Links

    MIL OSI Canada News –

    March 3, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Canada: Minister’s statement on Search and Rescue Volunteer Memorial Day

    Kelly Greene, Minister of Emergency Management and Climate Readiness, has released the following statement on Search and Rescue Volunteer Memorial Day:

    “Today, we recognize the incredible dedication of search and rescue volunteers and the sacrifices they have made while serving people in British Columbia.

    “Our province is fortunate to have some of the most skilled, passionate and selfless search and rescue volunteers in the world. Together, the BC Search and Rescue Association, Royal Canadian Marine Search and Rescue, and PEP Air have saved the lives of thousands of people. They are heroes.

    “Search and rescue volunteers are on call 24 hours a day, 365 days a year, providing their time and expertise to help people throughout British Columbia. While much of their work happens far from public view, their impact is felt across the entire province. They are the lifelines in our greatest moments of need, and we are incredibly grateful for their dedication. To all those volunteering on search and rescue teams, on behalf of all British Columbians, thank you. We are forever grateful.

    “It takes a remarkable kind of person to be a search and rescue volunteer: someone who is driven, courageous and has an unwavering commitment to helping others. These search and rescue missions can come with an incredible cost. Since 1967, there have been 17 search-and-rescue volunteers who have lost their lives while serving British Columbians. Their sacrifices will never be forgotten.

    “Today, on Search and Rescue Memorial Day, I would like to invite all British Columbians to reflect on those heroic volunteers who lost their lives in the pursuit of safety for others, their loves ones, and their service to the people of our province.”

    MIL OSI Canada News –

    March 3, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Global: Soaring U.S. egg prices and millions of dead chickens signal the deep problems and risks in modern poultry production

    Source: The Conversation – Canada – By Tony Weis, Professor of Geography and Environment, Western University

    The recent volatility of egg prices in the United States has been a hot topic. Media coverage has consistently made the connection between supply problems and virulent strains of avian flu that has been afflicting poultry birds since 2022.

    Many articles have indicated that, in addition to millions of birds dying from avian flu, infected flocks have widely been killed en masse in an attempt to contain its spread. The livestock industry euphemistically calls this killing of infected animals “depopulation,” and around 150 million birds have been depopulated since the current crisis began.

    I have studied industrial livestock production for many years and have seen its myriad problems flash in and out of the media — such as greenhouse gas emissions, air and water pollution, food-borne illnesses, labour exploitation, and animal suffering. But it’s rare for the sector to stay in the media for long.

    The unusually heavy media coverage of expensive eggs, depopulated chickens and avian flu has highlighted some of the deep problems and risks of modern poultry production. Unfortunately, however, important context and dynamics have been regularly omitted.

    Unpacking key omissions helps to better understand both the nature of these chronic risks of infectious disease and the perilous response of the Trump administration.

    The spotlight on avian flu

    Multiple strains of avian flu chronically circulate within populations of both wild and domesticated birds. Avian flu is prone to frequent mutations, and occasionally some strains become more virulent and spillover across species.

    In addition to the problems avian flu in poultry production, recent media coverage has also highlighted the virus’s broader dangers.

    Avian flu is currently ravaging many wild animal species around the world, reaching into extremely remote places and even zoos.

    In the U.S., avian flu recently spilled over into cattle — causing widespread illness after a mutation enabled intra-species transmission.

    Avian flu has also caused a small number of severe human illnesses in the U.S. (primarily workers in poultry operations). Although no human-to-human transmission is evident — a necessary condition for a pandemic — this potential remains a grave threat.

    Key issues underplayed

    Although the media coverage of egg prices, depopulated chickens and avian flu has cast a valuable spotlight on many aspects of modern poultry production, it has also tended to leave out some important elements.

    Mentions in the media of many millions of chickens being killed to contain the spread of avian flu will surely sound jarring to some. But such figures pale in comparison to the 9.5 billion chickens slaughtered annually in the U.S. and the 76 billion slaughtered annually worldwide.

    Poultry birds now comprise 70 per cent of the total biomass of all birds on earth. Most are produced in densely-packed operations where reproduction, life and death have been greatly accelerated.

    Modern chickens have been selectively bred to either put on weight (broilers) or produce eggs (layers) very quickly. Broilers reach slaughter weight in a mere six weeks. Layer hens produce nearly an egg a day for about a year or two, before being slaughtered. These short life-cycles are rarely mentioned in coverage of depopulations.

    The growing risk of avian flu mutations relate to both enormity of poultry bird populations — by far the biggest habitat for the virus — and the unhealthy conditions of life in large enclosures.

    According to the U.S. Census of Agriculture, over 97 per cent of layers live in operations with at least 10,000 birds. Over 99 per cent of broilers are grown in operations with annual sales of at least 100,000 birds.

    This scale also relates to a question that has, with a few notable exceptions, received scant coverage: since infected populations cannot simply be shipped to the slaughterhouse, how are the birds actually killed?

    A leading approach to depopulation is ventilation shutdown. This involves turning off the powerful fans needed to make the ambient conditions in large enclosures bearable, and results in agonizing deaths.

    Researchers are investigating ways to augment ventilation shutdown as part of a broader research agenda seeking to develop systematic ways to depopulate large operations. This agenda clearly illustrates that the livestock industry is acutely aware of the great risks of infectious disease evolution within these spaces.

    Undermining infectious disease surveillance

    In the 2024 election campaign, Republicans regularly pointed to high egg prices in efforts to highlight rising inflation. In early 2025, the continuing rise of egg prices has cast a glare on U.S. President Donald Trump’s failed promise to immediately solve inflation.

    In response to scrutiny, the Trump administration initially tried to blame Biden for the depopulation of chickens. While such deflection might work for a time, Trump and his advisors realize they need a strategy to increase egg supplies.

    This emerging strategy must be viewed in relation to Trump’s sweeping assault on state institutions and regulations — which includes undermining crucial capacity for infectious disease surveillance. Trump made immediate cuts to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and forced it to disengage with the World Health Organization. He has also promised big cuts to the National Institutes of Health.

    In this context, it’s unsurprising that Trump is laying out a simple plan to increase the egg supply: rebuilding layer populations, reducing depopulations and trusting the livestock and pharmaceutical industries to find ways of containing avian flu — likely through vaccines and strengthened biosecurity.

    It’s profoundly irrational to be weakening infectious disease surveillance in the midst of the current avian flu crisis (and amid mounting infectious disease risks more generally).
    It’s also hard to fathom how further empowering the leading actors in poultry production can be expected to resolve the risks of avian flu that are so bound up in the nature of modern production.

    Pursuing this course might temporarily bring egg prices down, but it also inevitably means passing untold risks into the future.

    Tony Weis does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    – ref. Soaring U.S. egg prices and millions of dead chickens signal the deep problems and risks in modern poultry production – https://theconversation.com/soaring-u-s-egg-prices-and-millions-of-dead-chickens-signal-the-deep-problems-and-risks-in-modern-poultry-production-249679

    MIL OSI – Global Reports –

    March 3, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Global: The Canada Carbon Rebate is still widely misunderstood — here’s why

    Source: The Conversation – Canada – By Ruolz Ariste, Adjunct Professor, School of Public Policy and Administration, Carleton University

    As Canada’s federal parties gear up for the upcoming federal election, one of the key issues on the campaign trail will be how Canada will meet its climate policy targets.

    Several strategies exist to meet these targets, including: a border charge on imports, a border rebate for exports, a domestic output-based subsidy or a consumer-based carbon rebate like the Canada Carbon Rebate (CCR).

    The CCR, introduced by Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s administration to curb carbon emissions, is designed to offset the costs of carbon pricing by providing rebates to households.




    Read more:
    The upcoming election is a critical juncture for Canada’s carbon tax and climate policies


    However, both leading candidates for Liberal Party leadership, Mark Carney and Chrystia Freeland, have said they will drop the CCR if elected. Carney has proposed replacing it with a green incentive program, while Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre has been a vocal opponent of the CCR altogether.

    The debate surrounding the CCR is crucial, as carbon pricing is the most effective measure to reduce greenhouse gas emissions when paired with accompanying measures. Yet, despite its effectiveness, Canada’s major political parties are willing to scrap it because it’s not politically rewarding.

    CCR is widely misunderstood

    The CCR is widely misunderstood in Canada, leading to misleading narratives about its economic and environmental impacts.

    A recent report from the Parliamentary Budget Office (PBO) argues that industries facing pollution charges could become less competitive because of the CCR, potentially increasing Canada’s federal budget deficit by $4 billion by 2030, and making Canadians worse off.

    Similarly, a Fraser Institute report argues Canada’s global emission footprint is too small for the CCR to make a difference, even if environmental benefits are accounted for.

    However, these reports fail to fully assess the impacts of carbon pricing and risk distorting the debate and influencing policy in ways that could weaken Canada’s climate strategy.

    Yet an overlooked crucial fact in the debate on the CCR is that 80 per cent of Canadian families received more in rebates than they paid in pollution pricing in 2024 because major polluters bear the highest costs under the system.

    The missing perspective in assessments

    While the PBO’s report may be valid from a business standpoint, the report didn’t run a full cost-benefit analysis, which would have weighed both the economic costs and the social benefits of reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

    In climate policy, the social perspective is much more important than the business one. Without this context, reports like the PBO’s risk being misinterpreted, particularly by politicians opposed to climate action. This could have significant negative consequences for environmental policy in Canada.




    Read more:
    The carbon tax needs fixing, not axing — Canada needs a progressive carbon tax


    A major issue in economic assessments is that the benefits of greenhouse gas reduction are typically excluded because they extend beyond national borders. As a result, emissions reduction can appear to be a poor investment, when in reality, its global and long-term benefits far outweigh the initial expenses.

    The Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat’s cost-benefit guide acknowledges this issue. Under normal circumstances, global benefits should be excluded in cost-benefit analysis. However, given the nature of climate change, the guide states that the costs and benefits of greenhouse gas reductions — calculated using the social cost of greenhouse gas — are appropriate to include in cost-benefit analysis.

    A recent UN report supports this approach, estimating that while global carbon policy measures could cost more than US$1 trillion annually, the economic benefits will be far greater. Shifting to a green economy could yield US$26 trillion by 2030, compared to maintaining business as usual.

    Carbon leakage challenge

    A major challenge for Canada’s carbon pricing strategy is that many of its key trading partners don’t impose similar emissions pricing on consumers.

    For example, the United States and China don’t, even though they are the world’s two biggest polluters. While some jurisdictions, like California’s Cap-and-Trade Program and China’s national emissions trading system, have introduced emissions regulations, these programs are not as widespread as Canada’s.

    This imbalance puts Canadian producers at a competitive disadvantage. In response, some businesses may choose to move their production operations to countries with weaker environmental regulations to avoid higher carbon pricing in Canada — a phenomenon known as “carbon leakage.”

    Instead of reducing emissions, this carbon leakage simply shifts emissions elsewhere, undermining global efforts to address climate change. To counter this, there has been a growing interest in policies designed to prevent this from happening, such as border carbon adjustments.

    This issue is critical to Canada’s ability to meet its climate policy targets. Without effective measures to prevent carbon leakage, the country could face higher costs and less impact on global emissions reduction efforts.

    Can Canada still compete?

    Given the U.S. President Donald Trump administration’s withdrawal from the Paris Accord, one might wonder whether Canada should continue pursuing the CCR program.

    Ideally, Canada would not have to choose between strong climate policy and economic competitiveness. However, without a co-ordinated global approach to carbon policy, Canada faces difficult trade-offs.

    International organizations like the World Trade Organization (WTO) could step up by actively promoting carbon tariffs similar to the EU’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM).

    At the heart of this debate is the “polluter-pays principle,” which holds that those who pollute must bear the costs of their actions. This principle is central to climate justice.




    Read more:
    Carbon pricing works: the largest-ever study puts it beyond doubt


    Carbon pricing is the only abatement instrument that can implement the polluter-pays principle, but additional policies — such as border charges on imports, border rebates for exports or domestic output-based subsidies — are required to make it more efficient and politically viable.

    Currently, 75 carbon taxes and emissions trading systems are in operation worldwide, covering approximately 24 per cent of global emissions.

    Canada is considering its own CBAM, but challenges remain. Implementing such a policy could lead to heightened trade tensions with the U.S. or even provoke retaliatory actions.

    Need for international co-operation

    To make carbon pricing and border adjustments work, international organizations must help close the knowledge and information gaps. One way to do this is by providing more accurate data on embedded carbon prices to improve the calculation of carbon prices down the road.

    Further research is also needed to understand how domestic climate policies impact other nations and how to ensure CBAM’s interoperability with other climate measures. Such work will contribute to the optimization of climate policies for the benefit of all.

    In the meantime, Canada’s climate policy must strive to integrate CBAM in a way that aligns with global trade systems like the WTO. Some trade law experts have expressed concerns that CBAM may not be compatible with the WTO General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, and this must be addressed.

    If Canada were to keep the CCR, this integration would be especially important as Canada navigates future trade relations with the U.S. under Trump’s unpredictable administration. Canada doesn’t want to fall behind in its climate action efforts.

    Canadians would like the country to lead on climate action while staying competitive. A public consultation on this matter would be a good move from any elected political leader.

    Ruolz Ariste is currently affiliated with Carleton University and Université du Québec en Outaouais.

    – ref. The Canada Carbon Rebate is still widely misunderstood — here’s why – https://theconversation.com/the-canada-carbon-rebate-is-still-widely-misunderstood-heres-why-249097

    MIL OSI – Global Reports –

    March 3, 2025
←Previous Page
1 … 257 258 259 260 261 … 410
Next Page→
NewzIntel.com

NewzIntel.com

MIL Open Source Intelligence

  • Blog
  • About
  • FAQs
  • Authors
  • Events
  • Shop
  • Patterns
  • Themes

Twenty Twenty-Five

Designed with WordPress