Category: China

  • MIL-OSI Submissions: Universities – New fossil fish species scales up evidence of Earth’s evolutionary march – Flinders

    Source: Flinders University

    Climate change and asteroids are linked with animal origin and extinction – and plate tectonics also seems to play a key evolutionary role, ‘groundbreaking’ new fossil research reveals.
     
    The discovery of an exceptionally well preserved ancient primitive Devonian coelacanth fish in remote Western Australia has been linked to a period of heightened tectonic activity, or movement in the Earth’s crust, according to the new study in Nature Communications. (Open access when published)  
     
    Led by Flinders University and experts from Canada, Australia and Europe, the new fossil from the Gogo Formation in WA, named Ngamugawi wirngarri, also helps to fill in an important transition period in coelacanth history, between the most primitive forms and other more ‘anatomically-modern’ forms.
     
    “We are thrilled to work with people of the Mimbi community to grace this beautiful new fish with the first name taken from the Gooniyandi language,” says first author Dr Alice Clement, an evolutionary biologist and palaeontologist from Flinders University.
     
    “Our analyses found that tectonic plate activity had a profound influence on rates of coelacanth evolution. Namely that new species of coelacanth were more likely to evolve during periods of heightened tectonic activity as new habitats were divided and created,” she says.  
     
    The study confirms the Late Devonian Gogo Formation as one of the richest and best-preserved assemblages of fossil fishes and invertebrates on Earth.
     
    Flinders University Strategic Professor of Palaeontology John Long says the fossil, dating from the Devonian Period (359-419 million years ago), “provides us with some great insight into the early anatomy of this lineage that eventually led to humans”.
     
    “For more than 35 years, we have found several perfectly preserved 3D fish fossils from Gogo sites which have yielded many significant discoveries, including mineralised soft tissues and the origins of complex sexual reproduction in vertebrates,” says Professor Long.
     
    “Our study of this new species led us to analyse the evolutionary history of all known coelacanths.”
     
    Many parts of human anatomy originated in the Early Palaeozoic (540-350 million years ago). This was when jaws, teeth, paired appendages, ossified brain-cases, intromittent genital organs, chambered hearts and paired lungs all appeared in early fishes.
     
    “While now covered in dry rocky outcrops, the Gogo Formation on Gooniyandi Country in the Kimberley region of northern Western Australia was part of an ancient tropical reef teeming with more than 50 species of fish about 380 million years ago.
     
    “We calculated the rates of evolution across their 410 million-year history. This revealed that coelacanth evolution has slowed down drastically since the time of the dinosaurs, but with a few intriguing exceptions.”
     
    Today, the coelacanth is a fascinating deep-sea fish that lives off the coasts of eastern Africa and Indonesia and can reach up to 2m in length. They are “lobe-finned” fish, which means they have robust bones in their fins not too dissimilar to the bones in our own arms, and are thus considered to be more closely related to lungfish and tetrapods (the back-boned animals with arms and legs such as frogs, emus and mice) than most other fishes.
     
    Over the past 410 million years, more than more than 175 species of coelacanths have been discovered across the globe. During the Mesozoic Era, the age of dinosaurs, coelacanths diversified significantly, with some species developing unusual body shapes. However, at the end of the Cretaceous Period, around 66 million years ago, they mysteriously disappeared from the fossil record.
     
    The end Cretaceous extinction, sparked by the impact from a massive asteroid, wiped out approximately 75% of all life on Earth, including all of the non-avian (bird-like) dinosaurs. Thus, it was presumed that the coelacanth fishes had been swept up as a casualty of the same mass extinction event.
     
    But in 1938, people fishing off South Africa pulled up a large mysterious looking fish from the ocean depths, with the ‘lazarus’ fish going on to gain cult status in the world of biological evolution.
     
    Another senior co-author, vertebrate palaeontologist Professor Richard Cloutier, from the University of Quebec in Rimouski (UQAR), says the new Nature Communications study challenges the idea that surviving coelacanths are the oldest ‘living fossils’.
     
    “They first appear in the geological record more than 410 million years ago, with fragmentary fossils known from places like China and Australia. However, most of the early forms remain poorly known, making Ngamugawi wirngarri the best known Devonian coealacanth.
     
    “As we slowly fill in the gaps, we can start to understand how living coelacanth species ofLatimeria, which commonly are considered to be ‘living fossils,’ actually are continuing to evolve and might not deserve such an enigmatic title,” says Professor Cloutier, a previous honorary visiting scholar at Flinders University.
     
    The study’s coauthors have affiliations with Mahasarakham University in Thailand, the South Australian Museum, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Germany, University of Bristol, Curtin University in Western Australia and the WA Museum.
     
    The article, ‘A Late Devonian coelacanth reconfigures actinistian phylogeny, disparity, and evolutionary dynamics’ (2024) by Alice M Clement, Richard Cloutier, Michael SY Lee, Benedict King, Olivia Vanhaesebroucke, Corey JA Bradshaw, Hugo Dutel, Kate Trinajstic and John A Long has been published in Nature Communications. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-51238-4.
     
    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-51238-4

    MIL OSI – Submitted News

  • MIL-OSI Submissions: Asia Pacific – Singapore contributes to regional health emergency readiness through achieving Emergency Medical Team classification

    Source: World Health Organization (WHO)

    SINGAPORE, 12 September 2024 – Singapore’s Emergency Medical Team (EMT), known as SGEMT, today joined the ranks of quality-assured EMT,  prepared for self-sufficient and high-quality response to a wide range of health emergencies. This builds on years of work by Singapore’s government to support emergency response regionally and globally. The classification followed two days of intense evaluation by a team of expert peer reviewers from EMTs in China and Thailand, along with EMT experts from the World Health Organization (WHO).

    Ensuring that Singapore is now able to deploy emergency responders to outbreaks or emergency events anywhere in the world, reflects the country’s commitment to advancing health security. SGEMT’s operational readiness reflects a whole-of-government effort that involves collaboration across multiple departments: health services, crisis strategy and operations, foreign affairs, military and civil defence forces.

    WHO’s EMT Global Classification is a quality assurance mechanism, using external peer review to assess compliance against international principles and standards. The process ensures that emergency medical teams are composed of trained team members, have appropriate equipment, are fully self-sufficient, and are well-integrated within national health systems when deployed for emergency response. This mechanism enables safe and high-quality medical care to be provided during public health emergencies are well-integrated within local health systems. This quality assurance mechanism enables the highest quality of medical care to be administered during any public health emergency.

    Enabling a network of emergency workforce across borders

    Members of classified emergency medical teams form an integral part of the global health emergency workforce, comprising a network of trained and equipped emergency responders that can surge when required and requested by affected countries. The EMT Initiative, hosted by WHO, aligns with global efforts to standardize quality and enhance interoperability between national, regional, and global emergency workforce capacities.

    EMT classification advances WHO’s Global Health Emergency Corps (GHEC) vision of a trained health emergency workforce centred in countries and coordinated regionally, as well as globally. GHEC provides a uniformly trained and globally connected emergency workforce corps that can effectively respond, as one cohesive unit, during a health emergency.

    Reiterating the value of global health emergency corps, Dr Saia Ma’u Piukala, WHO Regional Director for the Western Pacific, noted: “In our interconnected world, efforts to build national emergency workforce capacities, simultaneously advance global health security. Initiatives like Emergency Medical Teams, ensure that countries are ready to respond with their own national emergency workforce during an emergency, and that they can access trusted networks of emergency responders across borders, when required.”

    The COVID-19 pandemic drove home the need for all countries to have emergency response capacities, a highly trained national workforce and access to essential technology and equipment. Through the Global Health Emergency Corps (GHEC) collaborations between surge capacities such as emergency medical teams and rapid response teams, and other emergency response networks such as the Global Outbreak Alert and Response Network (GOARN) expand countries’ capacities to diagnose faster and treat quicker.

    With the classification of the Singapore EMT, the Western Pacific now hosts 13 of 41 internationally classified EMTs, and national teams have been developed in  nearly every Member State across the Region, from Mongolia in the far north to New Zealand in the south, and in both the largest and smallest countries. Rabindra Abeyasinghe, WHO Representative to Malaysia, Brunei Darussalam, and Singapore, who attended the EMT verification process shared: “EMTs form a crucial resource for countries in the Western Pacific and the world at large that require deployable clinical capacity to reach remote and emergency-affected communities.” EMTs in the Region have supported multiple emergency response efforts, including for COVID-19, measles outbreaks, cyclones, earthquakes and even a volcanic eruption and tsunami.

    MIL OSI – Submitted News

  • MIL-OSI Submissions: BRICS – Russia and China are actively increasing the pace of cooperation in the fight against global monopolies

    SOURCE: BRICS Competition Law and Policy Centre

    The past meetings and the signing of the treaty, as the parties agree, testify to the active development of cooperation between the two countries in the field of competition law

    WUHAN, China, September 13, 2024/

    MIL OSI – Submitted News

  • MIL-OSI USA News: Remarks by President  Biden at the Economic Club of Washington,  D.C.

    Source: The White House

    1:15 P.M. EDT

    THE PRESIDENT:  Hello, hello, hello.  (Applause.)  Thank you, David.  In my household, we refer to David as the Washington Monument.  (Laughter.)  He’s been a friend a long time — a long time.  And not only thank you for the introduction, David, but thank you for your friendship. 

    And thank you all for being here and allowing me to be here. 

    Yesterday was an important day for the county, in my view.  Two and a half years after the Federal Reserve began raising interest rates, it announced that it would begin lowering interest rates.

    I think it’s good news for consumers, and it means the cost of buying a home, a car, and so much more will be going down.  And it’s good news, in my view, for the overall economy, because lower borrowing costs will support economic growth. 

    And it’s an important signal from the Fed- — from the Federal Reserve to the nation that after repeated interest hikes to cool down inflation, inflation has come back down, and the Fed — the Fed is lowering — switched to lowering rates to keep the country growing — the economy growing.

    At its peak, as you all know, inflation was 9.1 percent in the United States.  Today, it is much closer to 2 percent. 

    That doesn’t mean our work is done.  Far from it.  Far from it. 

    No one should confuse why I am here.  I’m not here to take a victory lap.  I’m not here to say, “A job well done.”  I’m not here to say, “We don’t have a hell of a lot more work to do.”  We do have more work to do. 

    But what I am here to speak about is how far we’ve come, how we got here, and, most importantly, the foundation that I believe [we’ve] built for a more prosperous and equitable future in America. 

    So, let’s be clear.  The Fed lowering interest rates is- — isn’t a declaration of victory.  It’s a declaration of progress.   It’s a signal we’ve entered a new phase of our economy and our recovery. 

    You know, I believe the [it’s] important for the country to recognize this progress, because — because if we don’t, the progress we made will remain locked in the fear of negative mindset and dominate our economic outlook since the pandemic began, instead of seeing the immense opportunities in front of us right now. 

    It’s — this is a moment, in my view, for business to feel greater confidence to invest, hire, and to expand.  It’s a moment for individuals to feel greater confidence buying a home, a new car, starting a family, starting a new business.  

    We’ve — we’re creating jobs.  [Un]employment remains very low.  Small-business creation is at its historic highs.  The economy is growing.  The main challenge we’ve had — it’s been a painful one but — has been the pandemic and the inflation it created, causing enormous pain and hardship for families all across America.  That’s not true just for us but for every major economy in the world. 

    But now — now inflation is coming down in the United States.  And the fact is, it’s come down faster and lower than almost any other [of the] world’s advanced economies. 

    So now, instead of looking at interest rates increases, interest rates are going to be coming down, and they’re expected to go down further.  And that’s a good place for us to be.  (Applause.)

    Now, a lot of people, as you all know — maybe you know a few — thought we’d never get here.  When Kamala and I came to office, 3,000 people a day were dying of COVID — 3,000 a day.  Millions of Americans had lost their jobs, their businesses.  And the global economy was in a tailspin. 

    Four years ago, we inherited the worst pandemic in a century and the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression.  In fact, my predecessor was one of just a few — two presidents in American history who left office with fewer jobs than the day he came into office.  The other?  Herbert Hoover. 

    When I came to office, there was no real plan in place — no plan to deal with the pandemic, no plan to get the economy back on its feet.  Nothing — virtually nothing. 

    In fact, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office predicted we wouldn’t — they wouldn’t see a full recovery until well after the end of my first term in office.  But I refused to accept that, like many of you refused to accept it. 

    I came into office determined not only to deliver immediate economic relief for the American people but to transform the way our economy works over the long term; to write a new economic playbook, grow the economy from the middle out and the bottom up, not just the top down; put workers first; support unions to make sure workers have a bargaining clout they need to get a fair price to grow that pie — and after all, it’s the productivity that’s — they — they’re the productivity baked into that pie, in my view; no one — leave no one behind; foster fair — fair competition; invest in all of America and in all Americans. 

    When we do things for the poor and have — they have a ladder up, the middle class does very well, and the wealthy continue to do very well.  We all do well.  And we are doing well.  Working families and the middle class are the center of the strong, equitable, and sustainable recovery. 

    Here are the keys from the new playbook, in my view.  Within the first two months in office, I signed the American Rescue Plan, one of the most significant economic recovery packages in our history.  Not a single person on the other team — Republicans — voted for it. 

    It delivered shots in the arm for vaccines to vaccinate the nation in one of the most sophisticated logistical operations in American history.  I found it incredibly difficult to plan that.  Without protecting our nation from COVID, our economic recovery would never have taken off. 

    It also delivered immediate economic relief for those who needed it the most.  An individual earning less than $75,000 a year received a $1,400 check.  So, a family of five earning less than $150,000 a year could receive as much as $7,000.  And, by the way, in middle-class families like the one I grew up and many of you grew up in, that is a game changer.  That saved people’s sense of being. 

    It also prevented a wave — a wave of evictions, bankruptcies, and delinquencies and defaults that the previous crises weak- — weakened the recovery and left working families permanently further behind.

    I was determined to avoid what Secretary Yellen called the “economic scarring” — scarring that hurt so many Americans and left them behind in the past. 

    We delivered essential funding to states and local governments to keep essential services moving, to keep teachers and first responders on the job, to keep small businesses open, and to build more housing.  We also expanded the Child Tax Credit to cut child poverty in half. 

    And with the Butch Lewis Act, we took the most significant action in 50 years to protect the pensions of millions of union workers and retirees.  Before we acted, workers faced cuts to their pensions.  Now we’re restoring the full amount of their pensions, including for workers who previously saw cuts. 

    And there’s so much more. 

    But we also know the pandemic led to a surge in inflation all across American and the world — and the country, I should say.  And the economy shut down and then opened back up in an unprecedented manner.  Shipping had stalled.  Factories shut down.  Inflation grew worse after Putin invaded Ukraine, which sent food prices skyrocketing and energy prices soaring around the world. 

    So, we immediately brought together business and labor to fix the problem with broken supply chains and unclog our ports, trucking networks, and shipping lines. 

    Remember those massive cargo ships stuck outside the port of Loa- — of Los Angeles, delaying deliveries and driving up prices during the holiday season?  Remember that?  Remember the shortage of baby formula and the crisis that caused?  Well, we got supply chains back to normal.  When we did that, inflation began to ease.  Doesn’t solve, but ease.

    It also — I also — I also rallied our allies to stand against Putin’s aggression.  In the beginning, there wasn’t a whole lot of support for that.  I warned them all.  I got clearance from the intelligence community to let them know when he was going to invade.  They didn’t believe it was going to happen.  But he invaded exactly when I said he was.  Led the world to realize that we had a real problem.

    And it — releasing oil reserves to stabilize global markets to — and, by the way, our gas prices are now down to $3.22, lower than before the invasion — (applause) — and $3 — below $3 a gallon in 14 states, including Delaware.  (Laughter and applause.)  I can go home now, past the gas station.  (Laughter.)

    Energy production for all — from all sources is now at record highs in America — record highs. 

    And unlike my predecessor, I respect the Federal Reserve’s independence as they pursued — it’s a mandate — to bring inflation down.  That independence has served the country well. 

    And, by the way, I’ve never once spoken to the chairman of the Fed since I became president.  It’ll also do enormous damage to our economy if that independence is ever lost. 

    You know, my new economic playbook also rejects the long-held conventional view among economists — many economists — that we had to lower our ambitions to bring inflation down. 

    After I took action to rescue the economy, we got relief to families that needed it.  Some experts predicted that people would have a — that we would leave the labor market and not come back to work.  They referred to this as “the Great Resignation.”  Remember that?  The Great Resignation.

    Well, to state the obvious, they were dead wrong.  We now have the highest working-age employment in decades.  (Applause.)  

    Other critics said it would take the loss of millions of Americans’ jobs to — and a decline in real wages and, yes, the recession to get inflation back down.  Possible, but I refused to accept that.  I believed, sometimes over the amazement of my staff, that we should seize the moment to finally invest in all of America and all Americans for decades to come.  We did just that with what I call our Investing in America agenda. 

    How can we have the strongest economy in the world without the most advanced infrastructure in the world?  How can that be?

         That’s why I wrote and worked so hard to pass the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, the most significant law in generations, to modernize our roads, bridges, ports, airports, trains, buses; removing every lead pipe from schools and homes so every child could drink clean water; providing affordable — (applause) — providing affordable high-speed Internet for every American, no matter where they live, not unlike what Franklin Roosevelt did. 

    Remember what he did?  You don’t remember.  You weren’t around, nor — by the way, I wasn’t — (laughter) — I’m old, but I wasn’t there either.  (Laughter.)  But he decided that rural America had to have access to electricity.

    The Internet is a — as a — is as critical as electricity was during his period. 

    I remember saying that to my younger staff, who looked at me, “Well, what are you talking about?”  (Laughter.)

    But look, we’re growing our economy.  We got more to do.  We’re improving our quality of life.  We’re literally building a better America because of all of you.  

    In fact, “Buy American” has been the law of the land since the 1930s.  And I have to admit to you, Tommy, the — “Tommy,” excuse me — Congressman Carper, my buddy — (laughter) — I didn’t realize that when they wrote the law in ‘33 about unions organizing, they also had a provision in there: Any money — it says any money the president is sent from the Congress to invest on an investment in America should use American workers and use American products.  Past administrations, including my predecessor, failed to buy American.  Not anymore.      

    Kamala and I are making sure the federal projects building American roads, bridges, highways, and so much more beyond that, like aircraft carriers and tanks, they will be made with American products and built by American workers, creating good-paying American jobs. 

    How can we be the strongest nation in the world without leading the world in science and technology?  I mean, think about it.  We walked away for a long while in investing in science and technology as a government.   

    During the pandemic, the American people learned about supply chains.  You know, I remember going home and saying, “Well, the supply chain.”  And my family, “The supply chain?  What the hell is a supply chain?”  (Laughter.)  No, but I’m serious.  Think about it.  It became common knowledge what a supply — what we’re talking about to all — the average American.

    And the shortage of semiconductors, those little tiny computer chips smaller than a tip of your finger that power everything — but every — everyday lives, from smartphones, to automobiles and dishwashers, to advanced weapon systems, and so much more.  Think about it.  It takes over 3,000 chips to build an automobile.  Remember the crisis when we didn’t have access to those in the automobile industry? 

    And, by the way, we invented these chips here in America.  And we still design the most sophisticated chips in the world. 

    But over time, my predecessors thought it was better to manufacture those chips overseas because the labor was cheaper.  That’s why they went overseas. 

    The result: When the pandemic shut down those chip factories overseas, the price of everything went up because we didn’t have enough chips here in America. 

    We learned the hard way that one of the best ways to strengthen our supply chi- — our supply chain is to make sure the supply chains starts in America — starts in America.  (Applause.) 

    And, by the way, if I could hold in the back there, that’s why I — I have great relationships with the European friends.  But this is one where they go, “Whoa.”  (Laughter.)  That’s why I literally wrote and signed the CHIPS and Science Act, to bring manufacturing back home and so much more. 

    As a result, private companies from around the world are now investing tens of billions of dollars to build new chip factories right here in America — in New York, Ohio, Arizona — all across the country.  

    You know, it takes time to build these factories.  But the number of construction workers is way up, and they’re making good salaries — already creating tens of thousands of jobs in construction facilities.  But the American public is going, “Well, where’s all this going, Biden?”  Because they haven’t s- — they expected this to happen overnight.  You got to build the factories first.

    When these factories are finally built, we’ll have tens of thousands of jobs running those factories — so-called fabs.  As you all know — this is one audience I don’t have to explain it to — they’re — these fabs are bigger than football fields, creating jobs that are going to pay over $100,000 a year, and you don’t need a college degree.

    And it’s going to generate such economic growth when the one outs- — in — outside of Columbus, Ohio — a thousand acres.  I call it a field of dreams.

    The old playbook was to go abroad to the cheapest labor, export American jobs, and import foreign products.  Our new playbook is we export American products and create American jobs right here in America where they belong.  (Applause.)

    But that’s not all.  I wrote and signed into law the Inflation Reduction Act, the most significant climate law ever, anywhere in the history of the world.  When I say “I wrote,” I actually did write some of this, my — my daughter would say, “with my own paw.”  (Laughter.) 

    Skeptics told me we couldn’t get it done.  Remember?  We couldn’t get this done; there was no possibility of this.  There wasn’t a consensus.  And if we did it, it would be too late and too little.  But we did it with your help: $369 billion for climate and clean energy, more than ever happened in the history of the world.

    Not a single one of the opposition — Republican friends — voted for it.  It took Vice President Harris to cast the tiebreaking vote in the Senate. 

    The Inflation Reduction Act is going to help cut carbon emissions in half by 2030, and we’re well on the way, including — well, I won’t go into it all — and creating hundreds of thousands of good-paying clean energy jobs for American workers.  I set up a Climate Corps, just like the Peace Corps; it’s going to — you watch what happens with that.

    Lower energy costs for families with tax credits to install rooftop solar and efficient-energy appliances, to weatherize your windows and doors with high-tech insulation, more efficient heating and cooling systems — and get a tax credit for doing it and grow employment and grow the economy — and so much more. 

    And, again, many of you are doing — you’re the ones doing it.  You’re creating these good-paying jobs. 

    The Inflation Reduction Act also focused on lowering costs for prescription drugs. 

    There was a law in America that I fought like hell as a senator — and a lot of others who did for a long, long time — to change the law: The only agency that could not negotiate prices was Medicare.  For years, many other members of Congress fought — for decades — to change that and give Medicare the power to negotiate lower drug prices, like the VA is able to lower dr- — negotiate drug prices for veterans. 

    Well, with the Inflation Reduction Act, we finally beat Big Pharma.  And we finally gave Medicare the power to negotiate lower prescription drug prices. 

    And now — millions of seniors have diabetes, as one example, but now, instead of paying up to $400 a month for that insulin for their diabetes, they’re only paying 35 bucks a month — 35 bucks. 

    And they’re still making a hell of a profit, by the way.  You know how much it costs to make that insulin?  Ten dollars.  T-E-N dollars.  Ten dollars.  Package the whole thing, you get up to $13.

    And, by the way, if I had Air Force One sitting out there, I could get you in the plane and take you anywhere in the world, any major capital.  Whatever prescription you have, I can get it for you cheaper in Toronto, London, Berlin, Rome — anywhere around the world.

    But it’s just beginning.  The same law says that starting this January — we don’t have to cha- — any new changes with the law, the existing law — every senior’s total prescription drug cost will be capped at $2,000 a year, no matter how expensive their drugs are, even expensive cancer drugs that cost 10-, 12-, 14,000 bucks a year. 

    And these reforms don’t just save seniors money, but, equally important, they save every American taxpayer money.  Just so far, these reforms will save American taxpayers $160 billion over the next decade because Medicare won’t have to pay — spend (inaudible).  (Applause.)

    And, by the way, that weight-loss medicine is just getting going, man, that debate.  (Laughter.)  Watch.

    All told, we’re proving that we can bring down inflation while safeguarding hard-won gains in jobs and real wages in American workers. 

    Today, a record 16 million jobs created, more than any other single presidential term. 

    When I took office, more than 2 million women left the workforce due to the pandemic.  If you listen to these other guys, they think women don’t want to work.  They don’t know women in America.  (Applause.)  No, I’m serious.  Watch.  Watch, watch, watch.

    And speaking of watches, on my watch — (laughter) — we reversed the loss.  We actually increased the number of women working by an addition 2 million women in the workforce.  (Applause.)  

    And, by the way, we have the highest share of working-age women on jobs since 1948, when we started — and we’re — and we — we started to keep track back then.  With wages up, incomes up for women workers, we’ve always believed women should be paid equally for equal work.  And there’s not a single damn job a woman can’t do that a man can do, including being president of the United States of America.  (Applause.) 

    You all think I’m kidding.  My younger sister used to be three years younger than me.  She’s now 20 years younger.  (Laughter.)  Went to the same university, took the same courses.  She graduated with honors; I graduated.  (Laughter.)  She’s the one who should be — anyway.  (Laughter.)

    Nineteen million people have applied to start new businesses.  That’s a record.  And here’s the thing about those new businesses: Every application to start a new business is an act of hope.  It’s an act of optimism, hope. 

    More Americans have health insurance than ever before, and I don’t think that should be something we should sneeze at.  Everyone deserves basic health care. 

    The racial wealth gap — (applause) — is the smallest in 20 years. 

    Remember how many economists thought we’d need a recession to bring down inflation?  There was even a major financial news headline, which I’ll not reference, saying, “100 percent chance of a recession in 2023.”  Well, instead, our economy grew by more than 3 percent last year, and inflation came way down.  (Applause.) 

    American households came out of the crisis — American households — with stronger balance sheets, higher incomes, greater wealth.  And all that progress is a remarkable testament to the resilience and determination of the American people.  They’re the one — I mean, determination of American workers; of American entrepreneurs, like all of you; American business. 

    It’s in stark contrast to my predecessor’s record.  His failure in handling the pandemic led to hundreds of thousands of Americans dying because of COVID.  Remember “just inject a little dye, you’ll be okay”? 

    His failure to lead the economic crisis that followed that created millions of Americans — caused them to lose their jobs.  In fact, the last month of his failed term was the last month our economy lost jobs.  On my watch, the economy has created jobs every single month for nearly four years.  (Applause.)  Because of you.

    My predecessor enacted a $2 trillion tax cut that made — overwhelmingly benefited the very wealthy and the biggest corporations.  Made you feel good, I’m sure.  But guess what?  We don’t have to hurt corporations.  We don’t have to — I come from the corporate state of the world.  For 36 years, I represented the state — Tom and I — that had more corporations incorporated in Delaware than every other nation in the United States of America — every other state in the nation — the entire nation — in the state of Delaware.

    But what did his policies do?  It increased the federal deficit significantly, more than any other previous presidential term.  And the federal deficit went up every single year of his presidency and left office with the largest annual deficit in American history: $3 trillion. 

    And now he not only would give another $5 trillion tax cut for the very wealthy and the biggest corporations, he wants a new sales tax on imported goods — food, gasoline, clothing, and more.  As most of you know, such policies would cost the average American family nearly $4,000 a year. 

    But he and his allies say they support workers and the middle class.  Give me a break.

    On my watch, we’ve created over 700,000 manufacturing jobs.  He lost 170,000 manufacturing jobs in four years.  On our watch, factory construction is at a record high.  It increased 210 percent.  On the other team’s watch, factory construction barely increased 2 percent. 

    On my watch, the trade deficit with China declined to its lowest level in a decade.  On his watch, the trade deficit with China soared. 

    On my watch, we’re seeing a record stock market and record 401(k)s. 

    And the bottom line is I’m a capitalist.  I wish I had more stock.  (Laughter.)  But I believe capitalism is the greatest force to grow the economy for everybody.  I really mean it. 

    Now, don’t point to the fact that for 36 — this time I’m going to point out to you — when they did the income of all the members of Congress, I was listed as the poorest man in Congress.  (Laughter.)  I never thought I was poor.  I had a decent salary as a senator.

    But we face a fundamental choice.  For the past 40 years, too many leaders have sworn by an economic theory that has not worked very well at all: trickle-down economics.  Cut taxes for the very wealthy — and they deserve having taxes cut — but cut for the very wealthy and hope the benefits trickle down.

    Well, guess what?  Not a whole lot trickled down to my dad’s kitchen table. 

    It’s clear, especially under my predecessor, that trickle-down economics failed.  And he’s promised it again — trickle-down economics — but it will fail again.

    In fact, President Clinton pointed out that since the end of the Cold War in ‘89, America has created about 51 million jobs.  Of those 51 million jobs in that period, the economy under Democratic presidents created 50 million — a fact — 50 million of those.  And the economy under Republican presidents created 1 million of those new jobs. 

    Folks, I’ve laid out a better choice, in my view, to grow the economy from the middle out and the bottom up.  I promised to be a president to all Americans, whether they voted for me or not.  And I kept that promise, making a lot of Democrats very angry because studies show that I signed actually — one of the laws I signed actually delivered more benefits to red states than to blue states.  That’s a fact.  More went to Republican states than Democratic states.  That may not have been good politics, but I believe it’s good for the country.  And I kept my promise.

    Today, we are better positioned than any nation in the world to truly win the economic competition of the 21st century, in my view.  And there’s so much more we can do.    

    We’re going to continue bringing down prices for families by building more affordable housing, making childcare more affordable — and, by the way, you make it more affordable, it increases economic growth — growth — growth — by continuing to lower health care costs as well. 

    We’re continuing fighting to make sure everyone — everyone pays their fair share in taxes. 

    And, by the way, I hope some of you out there are billionaires, but paying 8.2 percent ain’t quite enough.  If you just paid 25 percent, it would generate enough income — $500 billion over the next 10 years.  We could cut the deficit.  And be paying 25 percent wouldn’t — anyway, I don’t want to get into it.  If I get going, might — (laughter).

    But my point is that includes restoring the — extended the Child Care Tax Credit to cut child poverty in half. 

    We’re determined to lower prescription drug costs not just for seniors but for everyone, helping the federal budget and household budgets and so much more. 

    I’m sorry to go on so long.  Let me close with this.  I probably — you know, early in my term, I traveled — to the skepticism of some of my own team and many of the Democrats — to South Korea to meet with President (inaudible) and — President Hu in — in Sou- — in South Korea and the CEO of Samsung.  They were manufacturing a significant portion of the chips in the world.

    And I sat with them and I encouraged both of them to invest in America.  And they agreed.  What surprised me, when I asked the CEO of Samsung why he was prepared to invest billions of dollars to build chip factories in the United States, they mentioned two reasons: because of our workforce, which I know we have the best workers in the world.  And second, they said we have the safest, the most secure nation in the world in which to invest. 

    And now, as I stand here in front of some of the most signifi- — significant business leaders and successful business leaders in the country, we also know we have the best research universities in the world — the best in the world.  We have the most dynamic capitalist system in the world. 

    But here’s what we can’t take for granted.  We have stability because we have a rule of law.  Our democracy is unparalleled. 

    I know I talk about the — a lot about democracy from the first time I ran.  But it’s really under stress.  For real.  We can never lose those democratic principles.

    American business, our economic dynamism can’t succeed, in my view, without a stability and security that makes us the envy of the world — and we are.

    Four years ago, we’ve gone from a histor- — historic crisis to greater progress than any of us thought possible.  We did it with a new playbook based on one of the most im- — oldest truths of our nation: Believe in America.  Invest in America.  That’s the truth. 

    Give the American people half a chance.  They have never, ever, ever, ever, ever let the country down.  Give them a full chance, and watch them lift us up to endless possibilities.  (Applause.)

    That’s what I see in this room.  Incredible — I really mean this, and I’m not trying to be solicitous with you — an incredibly — incredible business leaders, innovators who embody that sense of possibilities.

    You know, I spent more time with Xi Jinping than any world leader has: over 90 hours with him alone, traveled 17,000 miles with him in the United States and a — and in — and in China. 

    We were in the Tibetan Plateau, and he looked at me.  He said, “Can you define America for me?”  And, by the way, I gave all my notes in, so they have this.  (Laughter.)  And I said, “Yeah, I can define America in one word” — and I mean this from the bottom of my heart; I mean this from the bottom of my heart — “Possibilities.” 

    We’re a nation of possibilities.  We think big.  We believe big.  We sometimes fail, but we think big. 

    I have never been more optimistic about America’s future.  We just have to remember who the hell we are and how far we’ve come together.  We’re the United States of America, and there’s nothing — virtually nothing we cannot do when we act together.

    So, keep it up, folks.  We need you badly.

    God bless you all.  And may God protect our troops.  Thank you.  (Applause.)

    1:47 P.M. EDT

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI China: China to cut seven-day reverse repos rate

    Source: China State Council Information Office

    Pan Gongsheng, governor of the People’s Bank of China (PBOC), said Tuesday that the central bank will reduce the interest rate of seven-day reverse repos from 1.7 percent to 1.5 percent.

    The reduction was aimed at guiding the loan prime rate (LPR) and deposit rates to move downward and maintaining stability in the net interest margin of commercial banks, Pan said at a press conference.

    Under the market-oriented mechanism for adjusting interest rates, lowering the rate of seven-day reverse repos, which is a main policy rate for the central bank, will lead to declines in various benchmark rates, he said.

    The interest rate of the medium-term lending facility (MLF) is expected to drop by approximately 0.3 percentage points, and the LPR and deposit rates may decrease by 0.2 to 0.25 percentage points, according to Pan.

    The PBOC cut the interest rate of seven-day reverse repos from 1.8 percent to 1.7 percent in July.

    A reverse repo is a process in which the central bank purchases securities from commercial banks through bidding, with an agreement to sell them back in the future.

    MIL OSI China News

  • MIL-OSI China: PBOC Officials Interpret Financial Statistics for August

    Source: Peoples Bank of China

    On September 13, the People’s Bank of China (PBOC) released the financial statistics for August. Officials from relevant departments of the PBOC interpreted the statistics and answered press questions.

    Q: What are the PBOC’s perspectives on the financial statistics for August? What are the features of these statistics?

    A: Since early this year, the PBOC has conscientiously implemented the decisions and arrangements made by the Communist Party of China Central Committee and the State Council, pursued a sound monetary policy that is flexible, moderate, precise, and effective, strengthened the counter-cyclical adjustments, and created a favorable monetary and financial environment for economic and social development. The financial statistics for August have three main features.

    First, financial aggregates have witnessed reasonable growth. Recently, outstanding M2 has grown steadily. In August, both the outstanding aggregate financing to the real economy and RMB loans maintained growth rates of above 8 percent, about 4 percentage points higher than the nominal GDP growth rate in H1 2024. As economic restructuring accelerated, financial statistics maintained steady growth on a high base, and the financial sector’s support for the real economy remained solid.

    Second, the credit structure has been improved on an ongoing basis. More credit resources have been channeled to major national strategies, key areas, and weak links, thus providing strong support for the accelerated improvement of the economic structure. As of end-August, outstanding medium and long-term (MLT) loans to the manufacturing sector registered RMB13.69 trillion, a year-on-year increase of 15.9 percent. Specifically, outstanding MLT loans to the high-tech manufacturing sector increased by 13.4 percent year on year. Outstanding loans to technology-based small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) reached RMB3.09 trillion, a year-on-year growth of 21.2 percent. Outstanding loans to “specialized, sophisticated, distinctive, and innovative” enterprises totaled RMB4.18 trillion, up 14.4 percent year on year. Outstanding inclusive micro and small business (MSB) loans posted RMB32.21 trillion, a year-on-year rise of 16.0 percent. The growth rates of all the above loans are higher than the average growth in lending over the same period.

    Third, interest rates have seen a continuous decline at low levels. In August, the weighted average interest rate on newly-issued corporate loans stood at 3.57 percent, 8 basis points and 28 basis points lower than those of last month and the same period last year, respectively. The interest rate on newly-issued inclusive MSB loans was 4.48 percent, 8 basis points and 34 basis points lower than those of last month and the corresponding period of the previous year, respectively, both at historical lows.

    Q: What progress and results have the PBOC achieved in providing financial support for high-quality economic development?

    A: Since the beginning of this year, the PBOC has made every effort to make progress in technology finance, green finance, inclusive finance, old-age finance and digital finance and focused on optimizing the credit structure. As a result, financial support for major national strategies, key areas and weak links have been remarkable more intense, adaptable and targeted.

    At the macro level, we have strengthened top-level design and overall planning. We have introduced financial policies to support sci-tech innovation, green and low-carbon development, and all-round rural revitalization. Also, we have thoroughly implemented projects to enhance the capabilities of providing financial services for science and technology, green development, and SMEs, and improved the assessment and evaluation system.

    At the operational level, we have improved the incentive-compatible mechanism. We have optimized the policies on central bank lending for sci-tech innovation and technological transformation and automobile consumption credit, and stepped up support for large-scale equipment renewal and trade-in of consumer goods. In addition, we have extended the term of special central bank lending for inclusive elderly care, given full play to the role of carbon emission reduction facility and inclusive MSB loan facilities, improved the mechanism for coordination with the departments of science and technology, environmental protection, and agriculture, and encouraged and guided financial institutions to intensify and upgrade their support for these areas.

    As for financial services, we have supported enterprises in diversifying financing channels. We have enhanced the development of a multi-tiered bond market, thereby promoting the sustained growth of green bonds and corporate bonds for sci-tech innovation. We have upgraded our services for credit reporting, payment, and foreign exchange. Remarkable progress has been made in facilitating payment for overseas visitors. Moreover, we have actively and prudently promoted the development of pilot zones for financial reform in support of sci-tech innovation, inclusive finance and green development, and a number of financial service models that can be replicated nationwide are taking shape.

    Moving forward, the PBOC will effectively implement the policy measures that have been introduced, and accelerate steps to formulate the overall plan for “five major areas” in finance and develop policies on digital finance and old-age finance, thus forming a “1 + N” policy system. In addition, we will introduce more incentive policies and tools, continue to innovate financial services in key areas, and scale up support for high-quality economic development.

    Q: What measures will be taken for monetary policy in the future?

    A: The PBOC will adhere to an accommodative monetary policy stance to create a sound monetary and financial environment for economic rebound. We will pursue a monetary policy that is more flexible, moderate, precise and effective, intensify macro adjustments, accelerate the effective implementation of financial policy measures that have been introduced, and start to launch additional policy measures to further reduce the financing costs for businesses and the consumer credit costs for individuals, thus keeping liquidity adequate at a reasonable level. As maintaining price stability and facilitating a moderate recovery in prices are important considerations for our monetary policy, we will meet reasonable consumer financing needs in a more targeted manner. We will continue to enhance macroeconomic policy coordination, support the proactive fiscal policy in delivering more effective results, work hard to expand domestic demand, lay equal emphasis on consumption and investment, pay more attention to consumption, phase out outdated production capacity, promote industrial upgrading, and facilitate a high-level dynamic balance between aggregate supply and demand.

    Date of last update Nov. 29 2018

    MIL OSI China News

  • MIL-OSI USA: During Climate Week, Markey, Badum, Merkley, Barragán Lead Over 100 International Lawmakers in Urging Biden Administration to Reject New LNG Exports

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Massachusetts Ed Markey

    Letter Text (PDF)

    Washington (September 23, 2024) – Senator Edward J. Markey (D-Mass.), chair of the Environment and Public Works Subcommittee on Clean Air, Climate, and Nuclear Safety, today partnered with Representative Lisa Badum, group coordinator in the German Bundestag’s Climate and Energy Committee and chairwoman of the Subcommittee on International Climate and Energy Policy, Senator Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), Representative Nanette Barragán (CA-44), Senate and House colleagues, and leaders from around the world in sending a letter to President Joe Biden and Secretary of Energy Jennifer Granholm, urging the administration to reject new liquefied natural gas (LNG) exports amidst the global climate crisis.

    The United States is already the world’s largest exporter of LNG and is on track to exponentially increase export capacity – a full build-out that could yield hundreds of million metric tons of additional greenhouse gases at home and abroad. Pushing back on arguments that United States’ international allies need the country’s LNG, members of the U.S. Congress and Parliaments around the world are requesting that the administration reject these applications. 

    In their letter to the administration, the lawmakers wrote, “Far from being a clean ‘bridge’ fuel, LNG causes significant environmental harm. In addition to the greenhouse gas released when LNG is burned, the potent greenhouse gas effects of pervasive methane leaks throughout the LNG supply chain — which extends from initial exploration all the way through gas production, pipeline transportation, liquefaction, vessel transportation, regasification, distribution, and end-use consumption — likely eliminate any climate advantage of reduced greenhouse gas emissions.”

    The lawmakers continued, “In addition to the environmental and health benefits, limiting U.S. LNG exports will actually support global energy security, not jeopardize it. In both emerging and developed markets, overinvestment in LNG diverts resources away from cheaper, more stable, and less trade-dependent clean energy investments.”

    In Europe:

    “While Europe’s energy system was strained in the immediate aftermath of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in early 2022, it has since recovered. Europeans united to slash overall gas demand by 20 percent over the past two years. Gas prices are lower than before the start of the war, despite drastically lower supply from Russia.”

    In Asia:

    “China, the world’s largest LNG importer, has emerged as a major re-exporter within the region and globally, cashing in on lucrative price differentials that are facilitated by long-term agreements with the United States. Similarly, Japan, facing declining domestic demand and oversupply, is redirecting LNG trade volumes to emerging markets in South and Southeast Asia, bolstering profitable re-trading ventures.” Additionally, “South Korea, despite existing low terminal utilization and climate commitments, has invested significantly in expanding LNG infrastructure, highlighting a mismatch between capacity expansions and actual demand.”

    In Africa:

    “The expansion of LNG export infrastructure has sparked displacement, conflict, and environmental degradation, with many projects facing the risk of becoming stranded assets amid declining global demand. The African LNG export market parallels the United States in prioritizing foreign market interests over local needs amidst declining demand. U.S. participation in the LNG export market fuels this exploitative industry, undermining claims of leadership in a just global energy transition.”

    In the Americas:

    “Investments in new re-exporting infrastructure in Mexico will soon become stranded assets with poor financial viability, threatening the economic stability of the country for the benefit of short-term U.S. interests. Moreover, the export of U.S. LNG through Mexico also transfers environmental and climate justice burdens associated with LNG infrastructure, expanding the footprint of the industry’s harm to the country’s unique biodiversity and frontline communities in Mexico.”

    Cosigners in the U.S. include Senator Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), and Representatives Jared Huffman (CA-02), Rashida Tlaib (MI-12), Jan Schakowsky (IL-09), Pramila Jayapal (WA-07), and Eleanor Holmes Norton (DC). Cosigners internationally include 30 Members of the Thailand Parliament, 15 Members of the European Parliament, 10 Members of the German Parliament, 3 Members of the United Kingdom Parliament, 2 Members of the Flemish Parliament, 2 Members of the National Assembly of the Gambia, 2 Members of the South Sudan Parliament, 2 Members of the Tanzanian Parliament the Australian Senator for Victoria, Brazilian State Deputy for Para, Canadian Senator for Quebec, the Deputy Prime Minister of Belgium, 1 former Member of the Sierra Leone Parliament, 1 former Member of the Catalan Parliament, 1 former Member of the Flemish Parliament, 1 Member of the Timor-Leste Parliament, Member of Parliament and Special Envoy on Climate Change and Environment from the Republic of Vanuatu, 1 Member of the Sierra Leone Parliament, 1 Member of Tasmania’s Legislative Council, 1 Member of the Australian Parliament, 1 Member of the Austrian Parliament, 1 Member of the Cambodian Parliament, 1 Member of the Cameroon National Assembly, 1 Member of the Colombian Congress, 1 Member of the Gambian Parliament, 1 Member of the Ghanaian Parliament, 1 Member of the Liberian House of Representatives, 1 Member of the Northern Ireland Assembly, 1 Member of the Scottish Parliament, 1 Member of the Swedish Parliament, 1 Member of the Swiss Parliament (National Council), 1 Member of the Tasmanian House of Assembly, 1 Member of the Ugandan Parliament, 1 Member of the UK House of Lords, and 1 Member of the Victorian Parliament in Australia on behalf of the Victorian Greens Members of Parliament.

    In July 2023, Senator Markey and several New England Senators sent a letter to the Department of Energy urging it to consider the disproportionate negative impacts of LNG on New England as the department considers updates to its underlying environmental and economic analyses to improve export authorization decisions for LNG. 

    In May 2024, Senator Markey and Representative Yvette Clarke (NY-09) announced the reintroduction of the Block All New (BAN) Fossil Fuel Exports Act, legislation that would amend the Energy Policy and Conservation Act and ban the export of American crude oil and natural gas abroad to protect frontline communities from dangerous export infrastructure, prioritize U.S. consumers against fossil fuel profiteering, and help ensure the United States meets its climate and clean energy commitments on the world stage.

    In March 2023, Senator Markey and Representatives Ayanna Pressley (MA-07) and Rashida Tlaib (MI-12) reintroduced the Fossil Free Finance Act, legislation that would direct the Federal Reserve to require major banks and other Systemically Important Financial Institutions (SIFIs) to stop financing projects and activities linked to increased greenhouse gas emissions and submit a plan on how they would meet these requirements. In October 2022, Senator Markey reintroduced the OPEC Accountability Act, legislation to require the U.S. President to initiate consultations with the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) and some non-OPEC countries to reduce crude oil production.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA News: Remarks by National Economic Advisor Lael Brainard on Sustaining American Auto  Leadership

    Source: The White House

    Detroit Economic Club, Detroit, Michigan

    As Prepared for Delivery

    Thank you to the Detroit Economic Club for hosting me today. It is a pleasure to be back in the Motor City where I had a great time working on autos in one of my first jobs. 

    I want to thank Governor Whitmer for her important partnership, along with Mayor Duggan, County Executive Evans, Senators Stabenow and Peters, and Representatives Dingell, Stevens, Tlaib, Thanedar, and many others.

    The President and Vice President are determined that America’s iconic automakers and autoworkers are positioned to win the future. Our auto strategy is designed to invest in America’s world class autos supply chain from end to end; take tough, targeted enforcement actions against China’s unfair practices; and invest in America’s best-in-class autos workforce. 

    Today, I am pleased to announce two important new steps to advance our autos strategy. We are proposing a first-of-its-kind rule to safeguard America from the risks posed by connected vehicles from China. And we are building out the Michigan Workforce Hub to give workers the skills they need to contribute to this dynamic sector and expanding access to capital for small- and medium-sized auto manufacturers.

    The American Auto Sector

    The auto sector is an iconic American industry and our largest manufacturing sector. Over 3.2 million Americans work in the auto industry, and one third of those are in manufacturing jobs. The auto sector creates good-paying, union jobs that provide a ladder to the middle class, a sense of community, and the opportunity to work and retire with dignity.

    Nowhere is that more evident than right here in the proud city of Detroit and the great state of Michigan.

    While it wasn’t born here, America quickly made the auto industry our own. Here in Detroit, Henry Ford revolutionized transportation by mass producing a car for the common man. By 1930, the Big 3 had come to dominate global auto sales. The legendary Flint sit-down strike in 1936 gave rise to the United Autoworkers, and by 1941, hundreds of thousands of UAW members had good-paying, middle class jobs and pensions at the Big 3. During World War II, the auto industry became the center of the Arsenal of Democracy, churning out bombers, tanks, and engines by the thousands.

    When the Global Financial Crisis hit our auto sector hard, President Obama and then-Vice President Biden came to the rescue of the Big 3 and Detroit. UAW members made difficult sacrifices to get the industry back on its feet.

    Just a decade later, the pandemic brought new challenges. Decades of offshoring had left our supply chains fragile, and shutdowns of semiconductor factories in Asia and shipping disruptions led to layoffs on shop floors here and unfinished vehicles piling up in parking lots.
    Our automakers and autoworkers are no stranger to a tough fight. And this Administration has always stood with them.

    We worked tirelessly with business and labor to move semiconductors to auto plants and repair snarled transportation and logistics networks. These actions and our recovery plan enabled U.S. auto production to rebound three times faster than Europe. During this Administration, the U.S. auto industry has created more than 275,000 new jobs – in contrast to the loss of 86,000 auto jobs under the previous administration.

    Now our automakers and autoworkers face another seismic shift – the growing presence of clean vehicles, the rise of connected cars, and a wave of underpriced Chinese auto exports hitting global markets due to Chinese overcapacity.

    Investing in America’s Auto Supply Chain

    The President and Vice President have a comprehensive strategy to position the American auto sector to win the future.

    First — we are investing in America’s auto supply chain from end to end to make sure American autos remain best in class. That means investing in every stage, from small suppliers to final assembly, and using every tool at our disposal, from grants and loans to tax credits. This investment approach deploys demand- and supply-side incentives, from removing barriers to providing upfront consumer rebates to bolstering our domestic supply chains.

    Through the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, we are building a nationwide network of EV charging stations and building a domestic supply chain for batteries and critical minerals. Just last week, we announced $3 billion in selections for projects through the Battery Supply Chain Awards, including several projects in Michigan, to boost domestic production of advanced batteries, funding the expansion and construction of new facilities for critical minerals, battery components, battery manufacturing, and recycling.

    Through the CHIPS and Science Act, we are supporting dedicated investments for the legacy chips that power cars and the advanced chips and materials that enable electric vehicles to drive further and charge faster.

    Through the clean energy incentives in the Inflation Reduction Act, we are providing families with an up-front rebate of up to $7,500 when they choose to buy a U.S.-made electric vehicle with U.S. batteries and materials. The Department of Energy’s Domestic Automotive Manufacturing Conversion Grant Program is providing $1.7 billion of federal investment that is leveraging $5 billion in total investment to help retool 11 auto plants across eight states to produce electric vehicles and electric vehicle (EV) components while protecting good jobs and union jobs. Michigan is receiving $650 million of federal investment from this one program alone.

    These incentives have already driven historic investment totaling more than $177 billion in the EV supply chain, including in the battery supply chain that China dominates. They are supporting investments that are projected to transform the United States into a major lithium producer by the end of the decade and that are now projected to produce batteries to meet all forecasted U.S. demand for EVs by 2030.

    Protecting American Autos from Unfair Competition

    Second — we are taking tough, targeted action to protect our auto sector from security risks and to ensure China does not unfairly undercut our auto sector. Americans should drive whatever car they choose – gas powered, hybrid, or electric. But, if they choose to drive an EV, we want it to be made in America, not in China.

    In order for companies to invest in innovative new designs and models here in America, they need to be assured that their investments won’t be undercut by unfairly underpriced cars from China. And in order for consumers to be safe and secure in increasingly connected cars on American roads, we need to guard against national security risks from China.

    China is flooding global markets with a wave of auto exports at a time when they are experiencing overcapacity. We have seen this playbook before in the China shock of the early 2000s that harmed our manufacturing communities. We saw it in Michigan – according to one analysis, the Detroit metro area lost more than 55,000 manufacturing jobs due to import competition from China. We are seeing that same playbook in EVs and batteries after a period when China compelled American automakers to form joint ventures and license their technology in China.

    The Administration is determined to avoid a second China shock, which means putting safeguards in place before a flood of underpriced Chinese autos undercuts the ability of the U.S. auto sector to compete on the global stage. That’s why this Administration imposed a new 100% tariff on EVs imported from China. It’s why we increased tariffs on China to diversify the autos supply chain, including on EV batteries, legacy semiconductors, and critical minerals.

    Many of our allies, including Canada and the European Union, have followed our lead. Moving forward, we will partner with Mexico and Canada to ensure that our North American supply chains remain free from state-owned enterprises and foreign entities of concern. China’s overcapacity in EVs will be a major area of focus as we look to the U.S.-Mexico-Canada trade agreement mid-term review in 2026.

    And today, we are taking action to guard against safety and security risks in connected cars and ensure that our auto supply chains are resilient from foreign threats. Connected cars have the ability to exchange data with other cars, your personal devices, America’s infrastructure, our power grid, and auto manufacturers. The computer systems that power these cars can control vehicle movement and collect sensitive driver and passenger data, and the cameras and sensors embedded within them can record detailed information about our country and citizens.

    There are many benefits associated with connected vehicle systems, such as promoting safety, assisting drivers with navigation, and reducing emissions. But where we source these technologies has important implications for our national security, safety on our roads, and the resilience of our auto supply chains.

    China has taken steps to dominate the future of connected vehicles by dominating the software and hardware systems associated with those cars. But connected vehicles with Chinese software and hardware systems could expose the American people to new risks. Without the appropriate safeguards in place, sensitive data on Americans could be passed to Chinese authorities, or connected vehicles might provide a backdoor for malicious foreign actors to engage in espionage or sabotage.

    That is why, today, the Department of Commerce is using its ICTS (Information and Communications Technology Services) authorities for the first time to propose a new rule that would ban vehicles that rely on Chinese software and hardware from driving on American roads.

    Recall that for years China has required vehicle and battery makers to rely on Chinese data centers and software providers as a condition of operating in China.

    In effect, this rule will protect against potential vulnerabilities while allowing Americans to benefit from all that connected vehicles and technological innovation have to offer. 

    Investing in America’s Auto Workforce and Small Suppliers

    Third — we are investing in the autoworkers and small suppliers that are the backbone of our auto sector. We want to ensure that the next generation of leading American autos is produced by union autoworkers and that no auto community is left behind, especially here in Michigan.

    Today, we are unveiling new resources for workers through the new Michigan Workforce Hub. This spring, the President designated Michigan as a Workforce Hub to help Michigan workers prepare for the good jobs created by historic investments in the EV supply chain. The Workforce Hub, which we’ve developed in partnership with the Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity, will expand pathways to EV and battery manufacturing jobs and union jobs, particularly for underserved communities in the state.

    Today, the Department of Labor and the Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity are announcing a new pilot program to train workers in Wayne County for over 140 high-quality jobs in the auto supply chain, partnering with local automotive employers to enable workers to earn a paycheck while they train, addressing a major barrier to enrollment.

    In addition, the Department of Energy’s Battery Workforce Challenge Program is announcing over $1 million to fund curriculum, equipment, internships, and job placements in community colleges, high-schools, and training institutions across the state. Henry Ford Community College, for example, will receive $200,000 in seed funding to establish a state-of-the-art Battery and Electric Vehicle Technical Center. Key partners in these programs will include the Michigan Economic Development Corporation, high schools, vocational institutions, community colleges and universities, and battery and automotive manufacturers.

    Through our Good Jobs Executive Order, we’re ensuring the benefits of federal grants and investments accrue to workers and communities. For instance, the projects receiving Domestic Conversion Grants will create nearly 3,000 new good-paying auto jobs and retain 15,000 high skilled, union jobs. As a condition for these grants, manufacturers committed to supporting their local communities and workforce. By supporting strong investments, we also support pathways to the middle class, including through union jobs.

    For instance, Blue Bird pledged to expand training programs in local high schools and invest in childcare for working parents at its facilities. And ZF North America is using their Conversion grant to retain and retrain 536 workers – mostly UAW workers – at its facility in Marysville, Michigan, for the production of components to electrify vehicles.

    Last year, the UAW secured record contracts with the Big 3 that will help ensure an equitable transition to electric vehicles. Since then, we have seen a large number of additional automakers announce record wages, and a rise in new labor organizing. From Tennessee to Georgia, and in new battery plants in Ohio and Michigan, workers in the EV supply chain are seeing the benefits of joining a union.

    Our auto workforce also includes hundreds of small and medium-size suppliers manufacturing products ranging from screws and bolts to e-axles. The U.S. economy has added more than 55,000 jobs in manufacturing automobile parts and bodies during this Administration. Many are based here in Michigan: in fact, 96 of the top 100 auto suppliers in North America do business in Michigan and 60 are headquartered here.

    This summer, Vice President Harris came here to Detroit to announce more than $100 million from across the federal government to support small- and mid-sized suppliers and parts manufacturers. That includes. millions of dollars we set aside from the manufacturing conversion grants program for states to make awards to small- and medium-sized suppliers because we heard from officials and suppliers right here in Michigan that smaller manufacturers struggle to tap into large federal grant programs directly.

    Today, we are building on the Vice President’s announcement with additional actions to support capital access for small- and medium-sized suppliers. This includes a commitment from Monroe Capital to launch a new fund of up to $1 billion to provide lower-cost debt capital to auto manufacturers, as well as a $9.1 million grant from the Department of Treasury to launch the Michigan Auto Supplier Transition Program, which will help small and underserved automotive manufacturers and aftermarket suppliers secure financing to scale and shift to supply the EV supply chain.
    Conclusion

    Our economic resilience and national security have been tied to the strength of our auto sector for the past century. Now it is critical the U.S. auto sector is positioned to lead the 21st century.

    We believe that an investment in our auto supply chain – especially here in Michigan – is one of the best investments we can make. That’s why we are investing across the supply chain and strengthening our suppliers, small businesses, workers, and communities that are the lifeblood of the industry.

    Today’s announcements underscore our commitment to auto communities, union jobs, and to the competitiveness and safety of the U.S. auto sector. It is part of a comprehensive approach that is forward looking and leverages the strengths of American manufacturing and the talents of American automakers – here in Detroit, throughout Michigan, and across the country.

    ###

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: News 09/23/2024 VIDEO: Blackburn Discusses Fentanyl Epidemic with Tennessee Mom Who Lost Her 17-Year-Old Son

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn)

    WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Senator Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.) released the following video detailing her conversation with a Middle Tennessee mother named Kathy, who tragically lost her 17-year-old son, Vaughn-Thomas, after he unknowingly took a pill laced with fentanyl.

     

    Click here to download this video of Senator Blackburn’s conversation about the fentanyl epidemic with Kathy.

    “Most all of us know at least one person through friends, through family that has been affected, their lives have been torn apart by fentanyl. Over 100,000 Americans a year die [from drug overdoses], and it’s primarily fentanyl. The precursors come from China into Mexico, and then drug cartels bring it into the country. What we know is that across our great state, there are so many physicians and nurses and healthcare professionals who are on the front line of this every day. That is why we say thank you to our law enforcement and our healthcare community for the work that they are doing to fight back against fentanyl.” – Senator Blackburn

    “Vaughn-Thomas… was our firstborn, our oldest of three sons. He was very strong in his faith, he loved his friends, he was a good student, he was athletic, he loved golf – life was going really well for him… He was supposed to play golf with his dad the next day, and when Vaughn-Thomas didn’t wake up to his alarm, that’s when we found him. He took what he thought was a Xanax – it was a counterfeit Xanax. Our borders are inviting tragedy into the lives of our children. One mistake should not have been a death sentence for Vaughn-Thomas.” – Kathy

    BACKGROUND:

    • Fentanyl poisoning is the leading cause of death for Americans age 18-45. 
    • According to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), CBP’s fentanyl seizures increased more than 860% from fiscal years 2019 to 2023, and they nearly doubled from fiscal years 2022 to 2023.
    • Just last month, CBP officers in Arizona seized roughly 4 million blue fentanyl pills – weighing more than 1,000 pounds and the largest singular fentanyl seizure in CBP history
    • So far in 2024, the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) has seized enough fentanyl to kill 269 million Americans.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: ***MEDIA ADVISORY*** Cassidy Announces Themes of Upcoming Energy Security Summit in Baton Rouge

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Louisiana Bill Cassidy

    WASHINGTON – U.S. Senator Bill Cassidy, M.D. (R-LA), member of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, announced the themes of his upcoming summit, “Louisiana Energy Security Summit: Unleashing American Abundance in a Changing Global Landscape,” in Baton Rouge on Wednesday, October 16, 2024. The Energy Security Summit will bring together leaders from the federal, state, and local government, industry, research community, and more. Speakers and the full agenda will be announced in the coming weeks.
    Themes will be the guide panels and fireside chats throughout the day-long summit. They include:

    Advancing Energy Security in a Changing Global Landscape
    Exposing Threats to Global Trade and Energy Security
    Implications for U.S. Industries and Competitiveness
    Supporting Accountability and Fair Competition in Global Trade 
    Enhancing U.S. Competitiveness Through Louisiana’s Industrial Exports
    Strengthening U.S. Geopolitical Influence and Advancing Energy Security

    Registration is open to attend in-person HERE.
    Press must RSVP to shawn_hanscom@cassidy.senate.gov.
    WHAT: Energy Security Summit
    WHO: Senator Bill Cassidy (R-LA)
    WHEN: Wednesday, October 16
                   9:00am – 4:00pm CT  
    WHERE: Louisiana State Museum – Capitol Park Museum
                     660 N. 4th Street
                     Baton Rouge, LA 70802
    Background
    Cassidy frequently highlights the geopolitical challenges confronting U.S. manufacturers operating internationally. Adversaries exploit lax environmental and labor standards to gain an unfair trade advantage over American companies. Cassidy advocates for a U.S. foreign policy integrating national, economic, and energy security.
    He and U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC) introduced their Foreign Pollution Fee Act to level the playing field with Chinese manufacturing and expand American production.
    Earlier this month, he released the 3rd episode of Bill on the Hill, which highlights his Foreign Pollution Fee Act and discusses China’s growing economy and military at the expense of the American worker. After hearing fellow Americans share his concerns, Cassidy presented his plan to address the nexus between economic development, national security, and the environment. His Foreign Pollution Fee Act would even the playing field while holding China accountable.
    He penned editorials in Foreign Affairs, The Washington Times, and jointly in the USA Today Network with State Senator Caleb Kleinpeter (R-Port Allen), and State Representative Blake Miguez (R-Erath) discussing the geopolitical threats China poses to U.S. global standing. Cassidy also joined Greta Van Susteren on Newsmax to discuss his foreign pollution fee, noting the competitive advantage China receives from intentionally ignoring environmental standards. 
    Last Spring, the Louisiana Senate and House of Representatives unanimously adopted a resolution urging Congress to pursue an industrial manufacturing and trade policy to counter competition from China. Learn more here. 
    Last Congress, Cassidy released a landmark energy policy outline in response to the Biden administration’s assault on domestic energy. The outline details how we can successfully reset U.S. energy policy, including Cassidy’s plan for an Energy Operation Warp Speed to cut permitting red tape and unleash domestic energy and manufacturing. In support of this complete vision and in addition to the Foreign Pollution Fee, Cassidy led Republican colleagues in opposition to a domestic carbon tax and introduced the first comprehensive judicial reform for permitting bill. He also pushed back on disastrous proposals from the Biden administration to limit development in the Outer Continental Shelf with the introduction of the WHALE Act and the Offshore Energy Security Act of 2023.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: King, Rubio Urge FDA for Guidance on Stronger, Cheaper Drug Manufacturing Process

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Maine Angus King

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — U.S. Senator Angus King (I-ME) and Marco Rubio (R-FL) are urging the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to clarify its approval process for pharmaceutical companies considering advanced manufacturing technologies (AMTs) — such as continuous manufacturing, a means of production that involves a more uninterrupted process. In a letter to FDA Commissioner Dr. Robert Califf, the senators encouraged the FDA to incentivize the pharmaceutical industry to invest in AMTs to help address drug shortages and quality control issues, which contribute to more than 60% of the drug shortage problem.

    AMTs have great potential to lower the cost of drug production and can increase the possibility of domestic manufacturing. Compared to other industries, the pharmaceutical industry tends to operate in more outdated processes. Currently, much of the industry still employs what is called “batch” process, an active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) production method that takes place at multiple sites and can lead to sterilization issues. By implementing continuous manufacturing, companies can ensure a more sterile process at one single production site and reduce the risk of drug shortages.

    “For several years, the United States has grappled with a concerning uptick in shortages of key APIs and medications. Quality issues resulting from weak manufacturing standards abroad are the most common cause for shortages. Unsurprisingly, most of these quality issues occur in traditional manufacturing facilities overseas. The COVID-19 pandemic exposed the U.S.’ heavy reliance on foreign entities, particularly China, for our drugs and medical supplies. The lack of domestic medical manufacturing has created dangerous vulnerabilities for American public health and national security,” wrote the senators.

    “We are concerned that the FDA has not yet created a feasible pathway for stakeholders to invest confidently in domestic AMTs. As the FDA continues to evaluate its AMT regulations, we urge you to prioritize domestic manufacturing facilities and commit to frequent engagement with industry and patient stakeholders, ensuring a clear and efficient approval process for AMTs and their products,” continued the senators.

    “As the FDA works toward finalizing its AMT Designation Program and continues to evaluate and approve AMTs for commercial use, we urge you to ensure that these efforts prioritize domestic supply chain resilience and enforce clear guidelines for manufacturers to take part in this program,” the senators wrote.

    The full text of the letter can be found here or below.

    +++

    Dear Commissioner Califf:

    We write to urge the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to promote domestic pharmaceutical supply chain resilience through the implementation of programs to manufacture drugs and Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (APIs) using advanced manufacturing technologies (AMTs), such as continuous manufacturing processes. We commend the FDA’s work to issue industry guidance for considerations specific to continuous manufacturing of APIs, but greater action is needed to promote a resilient domestic API supply chain. We are concerned that the FDA has not yet created a feasible pathway for stakeholders to invest confidently in domestic AMTs. As the FDA continues to evaluate its AMT regulations, we urge you to prioritize domestic manufacturing facilities and commit to frequent engagement with industry and patient stakeholders, ensuring a clear and efficient approval process for AMTs and their products.

    For several years, the United States has grappled with a concerning uptick in shortages of key APIs and medications. Quality issues resulting from weak manufacturing standards abroad are the most common cause for shortages. Unsurprisingly, most of these quality issues occur in traditional manufacturing facilities overseas. The COVID-19 pandemic exposed the U.S.’ heavy reliance on foreign entities, particularly China, for our drugs and medical supplies. The lack of domestic medical manufacturing has created dangerous vulnerabilities for American public health and national security.

    AMTs, such as continuous manufacturing sites, provide a promising pathway to lower the cost of domestic drug manufacturing, and accelerate the reshoring of key API production here in the United States. Yet, the FDA has not yet invested sufficient resources toward developing clear regulatory guidelines for these innovative manufacturing tools. The FDA must quickly finalize and implement the AMT Designation Program, as directed by Congress, to provide companies regulatory clarity as they evaluate whether to invest and seek approval of AMTs for their products.

    Though the FDA has identified current regulatory barriers that are preventing more companies from adopting AMTs in their manufacturing pipelines, we are concerned that the FDA has not addressed these barriers adequately. A 2021 National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine report found that significant regulatory challenges to implementing advanced manufacturing for drugs include challenges within the FDA’s approval process for each step in the manufacturing process and the lack of guidance and expertise within the FDA related to advanced manufacturing technologies. Industry stakeholders must be able to establish the business case for the use of an AMT, but current ambiguities in the regulatory environment exacerbate challenges for arguing the business incentives for AMTs, deterring investment in these technologies. Though the agency expressed a willingness to address the barriers the report identified, a 2023 GAO report on the status of the FDA’s efforts in supporting investment in AMTs found that only a few drugs manufactured using an AMT are currently approved for marketing in the United States. Between 2015 and 2022, the FDA had only approved 16 out of the 112 applications or supplemental applications that used an AMT. This low rate of approval does not inspire investor confidence and proves that the FDA has considerable work to do to improve the regulatory environment for AMTs.

    As the FDA works toward finalizing its AMT Designation Program and continues to evaluate and approve AMTs for commercial use, we urge you to ensure that these efforts prioritize domestic supply chain resilience and enforce clear guidelines for manufacturers to take part in this program. As such, we request answers to the following questions:

    1. What strategies has the FDA implemented to encourage greater investment by domestic drug manufacturers into AMTs, such as continuous manufacturing?
      1. How has the FDA engaged with industry to further refine its regulations and expand opportunities for approval?
    1. How is the FDA ensuring that the AMT Designation program will benefit more domestic manufacturing facilities than foreign-based facilities?
    2. Based on the current application pool for AMTs seeking FDA approval through currently active pathways, what is the ratio of domestic versus foreign-based facility applications that the FDA has received?
      1. What is the ratio of domestic versus foreign based facilities that have been approved?
    1. Has the FDA received any new continuous manufacturing applications for generics, especially among pharmaceuticals experiencing domestic shortages?
      1. Will the FDA consider a drug or API’s risk for shortage when evaluating applications for the AMT Designation program?
    1. How is the FDA communicating about the AMT Designation Program to eligible entities and the public?
      1. How is the FDA ensuring the drug manufacturers of all sizes are aware of the program and understand the requirements to apply?
    1. How is the FDA ensuring the timely approval of continuous manufacturing technologies?
    2. Has the FDA seen continued growth in the number of approved continuous manufacturing products since 2022?
    3. What is the implementation status of the AMT Designation Program?
      1. Has the FDA made progress on implementing the required program since the draft guidance period, which closed on March 13, 2024?
      1. Has the program accepted any designation requests for new technologies?

    Thank you for your attention to this important matter. We look forward to your prompt response.

    Sincerely,

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Russia: IMF Executive Board Concludes 2024 Article IV Consultation with Brunei Darussalam

    Source: IMF – News in Russian

    September 23, 2024

    Washington, DC: The Executive Board of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) concluded on September 16, 2024 the Article IV consultation[1] with Brunei Darussalam on a lapse-of-time basis[2].

    Brunei’s real GDP rose by 1.4 percent in 2023 after two years of recession, mainly driven by the non-oil and gas (O&G) sector and the earlier-than-anticipated production from the new Salman oil field in Q4 2023. Inflation fell, reaching 0.4 percent in 2023 compared to 3.7 percent in 2022, supported by the easing of post-pandemic supply chain disruptions, the softening commodity prices, as well as large subsidies and price controls. The fiscal and external position deteriorated in 2023 reflecting weaker O&G production and prices. The current account was also impacted by higher service imports and net income outflows. The banking sector remains stable, liquid, and well capitalized with declining non-performing loans. 

    The recovery is anticipated to continue and risks to the outlook are broadly balanced. Growth is forecasted at about 2.4 percent in 2024 on the back of expected increase in O&G production, including from the new offshore oil fields and rebound in downstream sector, while domestic non-O&G non-tradeable sector growth is expected to plateau. Inflation is expected to remain unchanged at 0.5 percent in 2024, and fiscal and external balances would stabilize alongside O&G prices. Near-term risks tilted downward due to external factors and O&G production challenges. New O&G field discoveries would provide significant upside, while accounting for decarbonization pressures. Structural reform implementation, with product diversification and technological advancement, could boost productivity, but economic and social challenges would remain with adoption of artificial intelligence.

    Executive Board Assessment

    In concluding the 2024 Article IV consultation with Brunei Darussalam, Executive Directors endorsed staff’s appraisal, as follows:

    Growth rebounded moderately in 2023. The stronger-than-expected growth turnaround was supported by a new O&G field coming to stream in late 2023, a high interest rate environment and post-pandemic momentum boosting finance, transport, and hospitality. However, persistent O&G production challenges and maintenance related disruptions in downstream activities along with lower O&G prices weakened the fiscal and external positions in 2023. Consequently, the external position for 2023 remained substantially weaker than suggested by fundamentals and desirable policies and the output gap is assessed to be negative. Disinflation continued mainly due to easing supply chain disruptions and the softening of commodity prices, aided by continuing large scale subsidies and price controls.

    The narrowing output gap, O&G revenue uncertainty and long-term decarbonization trends warrant a prudent fiscal stance, while protecting the vulnerable and public investment. While the use of fiscal buffers in FY 2023/24 was appropriate in view of the cyclical position and to support economic recovery, restoring fiscal buffers through growth-friendly fiscal consolidation should be prioritized going forward. This will require enhanced revenue generation, and could be supported by a low-rate carbon tax, and expenditure rationalization—including via more targeted subsidies.  These efforts should be guided by a fiscal consolidation plan with clear fiscal targets. Plans to establish a MTFF and fiscal anchors, strengthening fiscal risk management and transparency are welcome.

    The currency board arrangement with Singapore is sound and has played a key role in supporting Brunei’s macroeconomic and financial sector stability. Efforts to improve monetary operations, by including Singapore’s interbank transactions in its analysis to understand the influence of Singapore’s policy rates since January 2024, and continuing to narrow the corridor by raising the SFDR, integrating I-bills into the Asset Maintenance Ratio and launching a website for better communication on monetary policies, are welcome. Enhancing inter-agency cooperation regarding the issuance and management of sukuks will be helpful. Over the medium-term, the BDCB is encouraged to build internal capacity in liquidity forecasting to calibrate the issuance of the I-bills and consider establishing a single treasury account. 

    The financial sector remained stable with strong capital and liquidity buffers. Systemic risk is assessed to be contained. Careful tracking of credit growth in both offshore and domestic personal loans is warranted, as declining oil prices could pose risks, despite low NPLs. Ensuring that that the foreign loans continue to be invested in highly credit-rated assets will help to mitigate credit risk. For domestic lending, continuing to deploy prudential measures like capping the Total Debt Service Ratio, assessing unsecured personal loan exposure, and maintaining NPL standards are welcome measures. Authorities are encouraged to stay on track with plans to implement Basel III standards for better liquidity management by the end-2024. Implementation of stress tests is recommended, while considering stress testing for climate transition and physical risks. Efforts to further strengthen prudential frameworks, develop a long-term sukuk markets, green taxonomy and unify disclosure standards, and to improve AML/CFT effectiveness will help to deepen markets, and support long-term green projects. The authorities’ commitment to continue implementing the recommended actions in the APG’s Mutual Evaluation Report is welcome.

    The authorities’ commitment  to ambitious and sustained structural reforms will be critical to ensure growth and diversification, including by transitioning to a low-carbon economy.  Reaching the authorities’ net zero emissions goal by 2050, will require continued development of  the non-O&G sector, including through adoption of green technologies. Continued skill development, while addressing AI-related challenges and closing structural gaps in the first-generation reform areas (external sector trade facilitation, improving business regulation, and governance) vis-à-vis top peers, will be key to facilitate FDI and PPPs. Completing the 2025 National Adaptation Plan and a Climate Vulnerability Assessment should support the prioritization of adaptation strategies.

    Data provided to the Fund has some shortcomings that somewhat hamper surveillance and data quality should be strengthened. Steps are needed to close the identified data gaps in national income, prices, external and fiscal sectors. Efforts for improving external sector data through a survey to better gauge trends in errors and omissions, and payables/receivables and strengthening public financial management (PFM) to build more transparent and accountable fiscal systems and aligning these further with GFSM (2014) are welcome, as are plans to enhance dissemination via the Fund’s e-GDDS portal.

    Table 1. Brunei Darussalam: Selected Economic and Financial Indicators, 2019–29

    Area: 5,765 sq. kilometers

                         

    Population (2023): 450,500

                         

    Nominal GDP per capita (2023): US$33,581.1

                         

    Main export destinations (2023): Australia (21.5 percent), China (16.9), and Singapore (16.7)

               

    Unemployment rate (2023): 5.1%

                         

    Labor force participation rate (2023): total 67.2; male 75.8%; female 57.3%

         

    2019

    2020

    2021

    2022

    2023

    2024

    2025

    2026

    2027

    2028

    2029

                 

    Est.

    Proj.

    Proj.

    Proj.

    Proj.

    Proj.

    Proj.

    Output and Prices

                         
     

    Nominal GDP (millions of Brunei dollars)

    18,375

    16,564

    18,822

    23,003

    20,319

    20,893

    22,197

    23,073

    24,081

    25,153

    26,447

     

    Nominal non-oil and gas GDP (millions of Brunei dollars)

    8,268

    8,868

    9,790

    11,043

    10,883

    11,386

    12,411

    13,620

    15,045

    16,281

    17,717

     

    Real GDP (percentage change) 1/

    3.9

    1.1

    -1.6

    -1.6

    1.4

    2.4

    2.6

    2.6

    2.7

    2.9

    3.1

       

    Oil and gas sector GDP

    3.9

    -4.9

    -4.8

    -7.3

    -2.0

    2.6

    3.1

    3.1

    1.7

    1.1

    1.0

       

    Non-oil and gas sector GDP

    3.9

    8.9

    2.0

    4.3

    4.5

    2.1

    2.0

    2.1

    3.5

    4.4

    4.7

     

    Oil production (‘000 barrels/day)

    121

    110

    107

    92

    74

    84

    94

    94

    99

    90

    90

     

    Natural gas output (millions BTUs/day)

    1,402

    1,358

    1,253

    1,151

    1,214

    1,226

    1,201

    1,220

    1,277

    1,313

    1,313

     

    Average Brunei oil price (U.S. dollars per barrel)

    68.6

    43.3

    72.1

    107.7

    87.1

    89.5

    83.3

    79.9

    77.0

    75.1

    73.8

     

    Average Brunei gas price (U.S. dollars per million BTU)

    9.1

    6.7

    9.1

    14.4

    10.9

    8.6

    9.9

    8.7

    7.8

    7.4

    7.0

     

    Consumer prices (period average, percentage change)

    -0.4

    1.9

    1.7

    3.7

    0.4

    0.5

    1.0

    1.0

    1.0

    1.0

    1.0

         

    (Fiscal Year, In percent of GDP)

    Public Finances: Budgetary Central Government

                         
     

    Total revenue

    26.4

    12.6

    24.0

    28.3

    17.3

    19.3

    18.9

    17.5

    16.3

    15.5

    15.1

       

    Oil and gas

    19.8

    7.7

    20.2

    24.5

    13.0

    13.6

    13.4

    12.2

    11.1

    10.1

    9.5

       

    Other

    6.5

    5.0

    3.8

    3.9

    4.3

    5.6

    5.5

    5.3

    5.2

    5.4

    5.6

     

    Total Expenditure

    31.9

    32.6

    29.1

    26.7

    29.2

    29.4

    28.6

    27.8

    26.9

    25.9

    25.1

       

    Current

    29.5

    31.3

    28.0

    25.7

    27.4

    27.0

    26.2

    25.4

    24.5

    23.6

    22.8

       

    Capital

    2.4

    1.3

    1.1

    1.0

    1.8

    2.4

    2.3

    2.3

    2.3

    2.3

    2.3

     

    Overall balance 2/

    -5.6

    -20.0

    -5.1

    1.6

    -11.8

    -10.1

    -9.6

    -10.2

    -10.5

    -10.4

    -9.9

     

    Overall primary balance excluding royalties

    -22.7

    -25.8

    -22.5

    -19.8

    -22.6

    -21.5

    -20.7

    -20.2

    -19.6

    -18.7

    -17.7

     

    Non-oil and Gas Balance (In percent of non-oil and gas GDP)

    -49.5

    -46.1

    -44.3

    -40.2

    -41.8

    -39.2

    -36.5

    -33.7

    -31.1

    -28.6

    -26.1

         

    (12-month percent change)

    Money and Banking

                         
     

    Private Sector Credit

    2.0

    0.2

    2.7

    6.0

    3.9

    2.0

    2.0

    2.0

    2.0

    2.0

    2.0

     

    Narrow money

    6.6

    20.8

    6.5

    1.2

    0.7

    3.8

    3.8

    3.8

    3.8

    3.8

    3.8

     

    Broad money

    4.3

    -0.4

    2.7

    1.3

    2.7

    2.6

    2.7

    2.7

    2.7

    2.7

    2.7

         

    (In millions of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise indicated)

    Balance of Payments

                         
     

    Goods

    2,211

    1,359

    2,679

    5,153

    3,808

    3,966

    4,264

    4,121

    3,925

    4,013

    4,131

       

    Exports

    7,210

    6,535

    11,001

    14,130

    11,264

    11,416

    11,987

    12,098

    12,024

    12,390

    12,780

       

       Of which: oil and gas

    3,244

    2,943

    4,730

    5,660

    4,185

    3,867

    4,387

    4,243

    3,798

    3,668

    3,617

       

    Imports

    4,999

    5,176

    8,322

    8,977

    7,456

    7,450

    7,723

    7,977

    8,099

    8,377

    8,649

     

    Services (net)

    -1,189

    -855

    -696

    -848

    -1,305

    -1,324

    -1,271

    -1,173

    -1,086

    -1,029

    -989

     

    Primary Income (net)

    362

    360

    90

    -370

    194

    327

    226

    193

    146

    119

    83

     

    Secondary Income (net)

    -490

    -350

    -502

    -671

    -749

    -641

    -687

    -692

    -673

    -684

    -683

     

    Current Account Balance

    894

    514

    1,570

    3,264

    1,949

    2,328

    2,532

    2,448

    2,311

    2,419

    2,541

     

    Current Account Balance (in percent of GDP)

    6.6

    4.3

    11.2

    19.6

    12.9

    15.0

    15.5

    14.4

    13.0

    13.0

    13.0

     

    Gross Official Reserves 3/

    4,273

    3,997

    4,980

    5,035

    4,485

    4,583

    4,682

    4,780

    4,879

    4,977

    5,075

       

    In months of next year’s imports of goods and services

    8.0

    5.2

    5.9

    6.6

    5.9

    5.9

    5.9

    5.9

    5.9

    5.9

    5.9

     

    Brunei dollars per U.S. dollar (period average)

    1.36

    1.38

    1.34

    1.38

    1.34

     

    Brunei dollar per U.S. dollar (end of period)

    1.35

    1.34

    1.36

    1.35

    1.33

    Sources: Data provided by the Brunei authorities; and Fund staff estimates and projections.

    1/ Non-oil and gas GDP includes the downstream sector.

    2/ In absence of government debt and interest payments, this is also primary balance.

    3/ Comprises foreign exchange assets of Brunei Darussalam Central Bank, SDR holdings, and reserve position in the Fund.

    [1] Under Article IV of the IMF’s Articles of Agreement, the IMF holds bilateral discussions with members, usually every year. A staff team visits the country, collects economic and financial information, and discusses with officials the country’s economic developments and policies. On return to headquarters, the staff prepares a report, which forms the basis for discussion by the Executive Board.

    [2] The Executive Board takes decisions under its lapse-of-time procedure when the Board agrees that a proposal can be considered without convening formal discussions.

    IMF Communications Department
    MEDIA RELATIONS

    PRESS OFFICER: Randa Elnagar

    Phone: +1 202 623-7100Email: MEDIA@IMF.org

    @IMFSpokesperson

    https://www.imf.org/en/News/Articles/2024/09/23/pr-24340-brunei-imf-concludes-2024-article-iv-consultation

    MIL OSI

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI Translation: The Government of Canada recognizes Won Alexander Cumyow as a person of national historic significance

    MIL OSI Translation. Canadian French to English –

    Source: Government of Canada – in French 1

    Won Alexander Cumyow played a leading role in the fight for voting rights for Chinese Canadians

    Won Alexander Cumyow played a leading role in the fight for voting rights for Chinese Canadians.

    September 23, 2024 Gatineau, Quebec Parks Canada

    National historic designations recall moments of greatness and triumph or invite us to revisit complex and painful moments that helped define the Canada of today. By bringing these stories back to Canadians, we hope to foster greater understanding and spark discussion about the histories, cultures and realities of Canada’s history.

    Today, the Honourable Steven Guilbeault, Minister of Environment and Climate Change and Minister responsible for Parks Canada, announced the designation of Won Alexander Cumyow as a person of national historic significance under Parks Canada’s National Program of Historical Commemoration.

    Born in 1861 in Port (Fort) Douglas, British Columbia, Won Alexander Cumyow was the first known person of Chinese descent to be born in what would become Canada. While he hoped to become a lawyer and articled at two law firms, discriminatory laws prevented him from voting and practicing law. As a community broker and court interpreter, he advocated for the rights of people of Chinese origin and descent in Canada in the early 20th century. He fought to end racist voting laws and voted for the first time in 1949, at the age of 88, two years after Chinese Canadians regained the right to vote.

    Throughout his life, Mr. Cumyow was an active community activist and was often called upon to serve as a leader, speaker or translator at activities organized by Chinese and Asian Canadians to combat racism.

    The designation process under Parks Canada’s National Program of Historical Commemoration relies largely on nominations from the public. To date, more than 2,240 designations have been made nationally. To nominate a historic person, place or event in your community, please visit the Parks Canada website for more information: https://parks.canada.ca/culture/designation/proposer-nominate.

    -30-

    “I can think of no more fitting person to receive this honour than Won Alexander Cumyow. An iconic figure in Canadian history, he exemplifies the perseverance and resilience of Chinese-Canadian pioneers. For over thirty years, he dedicated himself to his community from his office in Vancouver’s Chinatown, using his legal and linguistic skills to help it settle. At the national level, he was a strong advocate for equal rights, playing a crucial role in shaping the inclusive country we are privileged to call home.”

    Carol Lee, President of the Vancouver Chinatown Foundation.

    Oliver AndersonDirector of CommunicationsOffice of the Minister of Environment and Climate Change819-962-0686oliver.anderson@ec.gc.ca

    EDITOR’S NOTE: This article is a translation. Apologies should the grammar and/or sentence structure not be perfect.

    MIL Translation OSI

  • MIL-OSI USA: Pfluger Fly-By: September 13, 2024

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman August Pfluger (TX-11)

    Pfluger Fly-By: September 13, 2024

    Washington, September 13, 2024

    September 13, 2024

    Blocking Confucius Institutes from American Universities

    This week, the U.S. House of Representatives passed my legislation to stop the Chinese Communist Party from infiltrating American university campuses.

    The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) operates “Confucius Institutes” on college campuses under the guise of promoting Chinese language and culture throughout the country. In reality, these organizations are used as Trojan horses to gain access to critical American research and exert the global influence of the CCP.

    My legislation is crucial. It prevents the Department of Homeland Security from funding American universities that host a Confucius Institute or have ties with a Chinese entity of concern. We must not underestimate the credible and real threat that the CCP poses to the United States.

    Click here or below to watch my full floor remarks.

    Remembering 9/11

    Wednesday marked twenty-three years since the horrific 9/11 attacks on our country. May we never forget the 2,977 innocent American lives lost, which included many first responders who ran straight into danger.

    As a member of the Committee on Homeland Security and the Chairman of the Subcommittee on Counterterrorism, I have sounded the alarm on the rise of activity from aggressive terrorist groups. I have introduced legislation aimed at slowing the global recruitment and planning of attacks. The terror threat landscape is as high as it has ever been, especially with hundreds of known and suspected terrorists flowing across our southern border and the botched withdrawal from Afghanistan.

    September 11, 2001, will forever be ingrained in our minds. The fight against evil is not finished. Thank you all to my fellow servicemen and women and their families for their sacrifice. My prayers continue to remain with the families of the victims and survivors of 9/11.

    Biden-Harris Energy Agenda is Hurting Americans

    The Biden-Harris Administration’s war on fossil fuels has led to high energy bills for American families and businesses across the country. This week, I joined my colleagues on the Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Energy to learn more about the impacts of the Administration’s energy policies over the last three years. We heard directly from a generational family farmer whose business is struggling due to skyrocketing inflation and increasing production costs.

    In fact, the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s 2024 farm income forecast painted a bleak picture for American agriculture. It projects that net farm income will decline nearly 25% in two years, with substantial losses in crop receipts and continued pressure from rising costs. Meanwhile, interest rates are at the highest level seen in 40 years.

    Congress must pass a strong Farm Bill to protect not only our farmers and ranchers but also the American food supply. Watch here or below for my full line of questioning.

    2024 Angels in Adoption Honoree

    Congratulations to Matt Waller of Midland on being named a 2024 Angels in Adoption Honoree. I enjoyed visiting with him to hear about his work to establish The Attic Foster Network and the Heart Gallery of West Texas. I thank Matt for his dedication and commitment to bettering the lives of children and families across our state.

    Examining the FDA’s Role in Protecting Americans

    On Tuesday, I joined my colleagues on the Energy and Commerce Health Subcommittee to oversee the FDA’s regulation of food and tobacco. Since 2020, illegal disposable e-vapor products from China have flooded the U.S. market, with 65% of the market being illegal and targeting teens. The FDA has failed to stop these imports and hasn’t provided clear guidance to retailers on unauthorized products. The FDA must be held accountable for failing to protect Americans’ health. Watch here or below for my full line of questioning.

    Congress Must Take Action to Secure Medical Supply Chains

    I joined Representatives Brad R. Wenstrup, D.P.M. (OH-02), Blake D. Moore (UT-01), and Mark Green, M.D. (TN-07) in releasing a Request for Information (RFI) to solicit feedback for strengthening and enhancing domestic medical supply chains.

    Securing our nation’s medical supply chains is not just a matter of economic importance; it is a matter of national security. Congress must prioritize revitalizing our domestic medical supply chains to eliminate our reliance on adversaries, like China, for essential medical supplies. Read more about the RFI here.

    Applications Closing for Congressional Youth Advisory Council

    I am excited to announce the re-launch of the Congressional Youth Advisory Council for high school juniors and seniors in the 11th Congressional District of Texas. This esteemed program offers a unique opportunity for passionate and driven young leaders to engage with government, collaborate with peers, and serve their communities.

    Participants will have the chance to interact directly with me, special guests, and senior staff members in up to four interactive virtual meetings. Additionally, CYAC participants will be provided special admittance to the Pfluger Youth Leadership Conference in Spring 2025 (Date TBD).

    Interested students are encouraged to apply by completing an application at pfluger.house.gov/services/cyac.htm.

    The deadline for submissions is TODAY September 13, 2024.

    For questions about the program or application, please contact Corbette Padilla in the Midland district office at 432-687-2390.

    Upcoming Service Academy Night

    My office will soon be hosting a Service Academy Night on September 30th from 6:00-7:30 p.m. for high school students interested in pursuing an education and military career through the U.S. military service academies.

    The event will be held at the Angelo State University Houston Harte University Center in the CJ Davidson Conference Center, 1910 Rosemont Drive, San Angelo, Texas, 76901.

    Students, parents, and educators are encouraged to attend! If you have questions or would like to RSVP, please reach out to Mary O’Connor in my office at mary.oconnor@mail.house.gov.

    2024 Congressional App Challenge

    My office is now accepting submissions for the 2024 Congressional App Competition. The competition is open to all 6-12 grade students in the 11th Congressional District of Texas and is an opportunity for students to develop their skills in computer science and STEM skills.

    The deadline is October 24th, 2024 at 12:00 pm ET. Students can register and upload their app here.

    Step-by-Step Video Guide

    The Congressional App Challenge website has a step-by-step video guide that walks students, parents, and educators through the application process. Clickhereto access the video guide.

    PRIZES

    The winner from the 11th Congressional District, chosen by a panel of expert judges, will be featured on the House of Representatives website, House.gov, as well as on CongressionalAppChallenge.us. The winning app will also be displayed in the U.S. Capitol among other winners from across the country. Additional sponsor prizes to be announced.

    RULES

    · Students will create an application (aka app) for PC, web, tablet, robot, mobile, etc Any programming such as C, C++, JavaScript, Python, Ruby, or “block code” will be accepted.

    · There are NO LIMITS on the application theme or topic.

    · Students may work individually or in teams made up of no more than four.

    Students are highly encouraged to review the competition’s complete rules and regulations on the Congressional App Challenge’s website. For more information, please visit congressionalappchallenge.us/or contact Kathy Keane in the San Angelo Office at Kathy.Keane@mail.house.gov.

    Thank you for reading. It is the honor of my lifetime to serve you in Congress. Please follow me on Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter for daily updates.

    Rep. August Pfluger

    Member of Congress

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Africa: UN security council: African countries face hurdles and dangers in getting permanent seats

    Source: The Conversation – Africa – By Anthoni van Nieuwkerk, Professor of International and Diplomacy Studies, Thabo Mbeki African School of Public and International Affairs, University of South Africa

    There is growing global consensus among the members of the United Nations that the UN security council, responsible for maintaining international peace and security, requires reform or restructuring to reflect the current balance of forces, and to improve its working methods and ability to do its work.

    There is also growing consensus among members of the African Union that Africa deserves a permanent presence at the council.

    The debate took a new turn on 13 September, when the US announced it would support the creation of two new permanent seats for African countries, and a non-permanent seat for small island developing nations. This came after a pledge in 2022 by the Biden administration to support the expansion of the security council.

    The new permanent seats would come without the power of a veto vote.


    Read more: Africa on the UN security council: why the continent should have two permanent seats


    There are several reasons why, in my view, this quest to expand the council is likely to fail. I have followed and published on the South African experience of the UN security council and believe there is need for a sober assessment of what is achievable.

    First, those with permanent seats and veto power (Russia and China, the US, the UK and France) are reluctant to share it, for fear of diluting their own interests and influence.

    Second, if there was agreement on expansion, who would be worthy to fill the extra seats, and how would they be chosen? There are many deserving candidates, from Latin America to Europe and Asia.

    Third, how would Africa go about selecting two of its own to represent the continent on the council?

    Fourth, what would prevent such newcomers from being co-opted by the powerful (in this case, the US) to support or help implement western peace and security agendas at the expense of African and global south agendas?

    To offset the attractiveness and prestige of joining the premier international security club, Africa should be mindful of the entry requirements (namely, diplomatic nous, experience with peacekeeping and the ability to finance such), lest it find itself relegated to serving the security council’s longstanding members.

    Africa would be wise to select and support candidates that have experience, resources and a credible peacebuilding track record on the continent.

    Hurdles and dangers

    It is far from obvious that the continent’s two economic giants, Nigeria and South Africa, should represent Africa. Size counts but doesn’t always translate into attractiveness or credibility at home – a key requirement for a successful role in regional and international affairs.

    The unfortunate reality is that Africa remains divided on the basis of region, language and culture. The continent struggles to speak with one voice on critical matters such as peace and security – the priority of the UN security agenda.

    Under these conditions, a drawn-out and perhaps even unsuccessful process of selecting two out of the 54 members of the African Union is likely.

    In addition, the offer by the west for Africa to take up seats should not be viewed as an act of benevolence. Bringing Africa into the western sphere of influence is a strategic calculation to counter the growing impact of Russia and China on global affairs.

    The emergence of a new world order produces stresses and strains. The west, led by the US, continues to exercise hard power but declining influence, while an assertive alliance of global south states, led by China, is bent on eventually determining international affairs.


    Read more: Pan-Africanism remains a dream: four key issues the African Union must tackle


    Prominent members of the global south are enticed or pressured to partner with one or the other power bloc.

    Africa in particular is being courted precisely because of its large voting number (54 countries can swing decisions at multilateral meetings) but more strategically, because it constitutes the reservoir of the world’s future economy. Apart from being blessed with a youthful demographic, Africa can come into central focus due to its unique endowment of green transition minerals like cobalt, lithium and nickel.

    Where to from here?

    If all obstacles are overcome, the chosen countries would have their work cut out for them. Serving – never mind shaping – the UN security council agenda is a demanding, full-time task. The chosen African countries would have to commit significant human and financial resources, peacebuilding capacity and diplomatic leadership skills.

    South Africa is arguably the best placed to meet these criteria and can play a constructive role pushing the African agenda. But it needs to be wary.


    Read more: Rating agencies and Africa: the absence of people on the ground contributes to bias against the continent – analyst


    The country’s president, Cyril Ramaphosa, was quick to respond to the US statement. On the eve of departing for the annual UN general assembly talk show he told the media

    We have been campaigning and the concept has been accepted and of course Africa continues to play through various countries on the continent, important roles, peacekeeping missions not only on our continent but around the world. So, we [have] got the capability, we know how and Africa needs to be given its rightful place in the UN system and its various structures.

    Some critical questions need to be answered by all African leaders first:

    • What are the benefits for an African country taking up a permanent seat on the UN security council?

    • How would it contribute, and what would it receive in return?

    • Would it be able to set agendas and norms, or would it be forced to carry out the tasks of those who allowed it a seat at the table?

    Africa is not unfamiliar with the workings of the United Nations system. It has benefited immensely from UN involvement as it strove for decolonialisation and overcoming the apartheid system. It works closely with the UN as it faces the challenges of underdevelopment, unequal trade, extreme weather and the ongoing exploitation of its human and natural resources.

    It is fitting and ethical for Africa to take up permanent seats at the apex institution and put the security council to work to address Africa’s peace and security challenges.

    To do so, its chosen members must chart an African course of action, supported by the other members of the council.

    – UN security council: African countries face hurdles and dangers in getting permanent seats
    – https://theconversation.com/un-security-council-african-countries-face-hurdles-and-dangers-in-getting-permanent-seats-239642

    MIL OSI Africa

  • MIL-OSI Global: UN security council: African countries face hurdles and dangers in getting permanent seats

    Source: The Conversation – Africa – By Anthoni van Nieuwkerk, Professor of International and Diplomacy Studies, Thabo Mbeki African School of Public and International Affairs, University of South Africa

    There is growing global consensus among the members of the United Nations that the UN security council, responsible for maintaining international peace and security, requires reform or restructuring to reflect the current balance of forces, and to improve its working methods and ability to do its work.

    There is also growing consensus among members of the African Union that Africa deserves a permanent presence at the council.

    The debate took a new turn on 13 September, when the US announced it would support the creation of two new permanent seats for African countries, and a non-permanent seat for small island developing nations. This came after a pledge in 2022 by the Biden administration to support the expansion of the security council.

    The new permanent seats would come without the power of a veto vote.




    Read more:
    Africa on the UN security council: why the continent should have two permanent seats


    There are several reasons why, in my view, this quest to expand the council is likely to fail. I have followed and published on the South African experience of the UN security council and believe there is need for a sober assessment of what is achievable.

    First, those with permanent seats and veto power (Russia and China, the US, the UK and France) are reluctant to share it, for fear of diluting their own interests and influence.

    Second, if there was agreement on expansion, who would be worthy to fill the extra seats, and how would they be chosen? There are many deserving candidates, from Latin America to Europe and Asia.

    Third, how would Africa go about selecting two of its own to represent the continent on the council?

    Fourth, what would prevent such newcomers from being co-opted by the powerful (in this case, the US) to support or help implement western peace and security agendas at the expense of African and global south agendas?

    To offset the attractiveness and prestige of joining the premier international security club, Africa should be mindful of the entry requirements (namely, diplomatic nous, experience with peacekeeping and the ability to finance such), lest it find itself relegated to serving the security council’s longstanding members.

    Africa would be wise to select and support candidates that have experience, resources and a credible peacebuilding track record on the continent.

    Hurdles and dangers

    It is far from obvious that the continent’s two economic giants, Nigeria and South Africa, should represent Africa. Size counts but doesn’t always translate into attractiveness or credibility at home – a key requirement for a successful role in regional and international affairs.

    The unfortunate reality is that Africa remains divided on the basis of region, language and culture. The continent struggles to speak with one voice on critical matters such as peace and security – the priority of the UN security agenda.

    Under these conditions, a drawn-out and perhaps even unsuccessful process of selecting two out of the 54 members of the African Union is likely.

    In addition, the offer by the west for Africa to take up seats should not be viewed as an act of benevolence. Bringing Africa into the western sphere of influence is a strategic calculation to counter the growing impact of Russia and China on global affairs.

    The emergence of a new world order produces stresses and strains. The west, led by the US, continues to exercise hard power but declining influence, while an assertive alliance of global south states, led by China, is bent on eventually determining international affairs.




    Read more:
    Pan-Africanism remains a dream: four key issues the African Union must tackle


    Prominent members of the global south are enticed or pressured to partner with one or the other power bloc.

    Africa in particular is being courted precisely because of its large voting number (54 countries can swing decisions at multilateral meetings) but more strategically, because it constitutes the reservoir of the world’s future economy. Apart from being blessed with a youthful demographic, Africa can come into central focus due to its unique endowment of green transition minerals like cobalt, lithium and nickel.

    Where to from here?

    If all obstacles are overcome, the chosen countries would have their work cut out for them. Serving – never mind shaping – the UN security council agenda is a demanding, full-time task. The chosen African countries would have to commit significant human and financial resources, peacebuilding capacity and diplomatic leadership skills.

    South Africa is arguably the best placed to meet these criteria and can play a constructive role pushing the African agenda. But it needs to be wary.




    Read more:
    Rating agencies and Africa: the absence of people on the ground contributes to bias against the continent – analyst


    The country’s president, Cyril Ramaphosa, was quick to respond to the US statement. On the eve of departing for the annual UN general assembly talk show he told the media

    We have been campaigning and the concept has been accepted and of course Africa continues to play through various countries on the continent, important roles, peacekeeping missions not only on our continent but around the world. So, we [have] got the capability, we know how and Africa needs to be given its rightful place in the UN system and its various structures.

    Some critical questions need to be answered by all African leaders first:

    • What are the benefits for an African country taking up a permanent seat on the UN security council?

    • How would it contribute, and what would it receive in return?

    • Would it be able to set agendas and norms, or would it be forced to carry out the tasks of those who allowed it a seat at the table?

    Africa is not unfamiliar with the workings of the United Nations system. It has benefited immensely from UN involvement as it strove for decolonialisation and overcoming the apartheid system. It works closely with the UN as it faces the challenges of underdevelopment, unequal trade, extreme weather and the ongoing exploitation of its human and natural resources.

    It is fitting and ethical for Africa to take up permanent seats at the apex institution and put the security council to work to address Africa’s peace and security challenges.

    To do so, its chosen members must chart an African course of action, supported by the other members of the council.

    Anthoni van Nieuwkerk does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. UN security council: African countries face hurdles and dangers in getting permanent seats – https://theconversation.com/un-security-council-african-countries-face-hurdles-and-dangers-in-getting-permanent-seats-239642

    MIL OSI – Global Reports

  • MIL-OSI USA: Overturning the Biden-Harris De Facto EV Mandate

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Bruce Westerman (AR-04)

    Exactly six months ago, the Biden-Harris Administration’s EPA announced its overreaching and unrealistic vehicle tailpipe emissions rule, which is essentially a de facto ban on the sale of gas-powered and traditional hybrid vehicles, forcing automakers to produce and sell more electric vehicles (EVs). This tone-deaf rule was just another attempt by the Biden-Harris Administration to cater to extreme climate activists.

    Not only are EVs proven less reliable than vehicles with internal combustion engines, but they can also present major financial challenges for consumers in rural areas, like much of the 4th District. This is a reality that can’t be ignored. To make matters worse, scientific data shows that the Biden-Harris Administration’s preposterous push for electrification may actually do more harm than good for our environment.

    If all U.S. passenger cars and light-duty trucks were magically converted to EVs overnight, global greenhouse gas emissions would [theoretically] only be reduced by less than 1% (0.89%), according to data from the U.S. Government. That statistic doesn’t even consider the embedded carbon in EVs due to the massive amounts of mining and mineral processing required to build EVs, nor does it consider the added electricity generation required to meet the needs to power that many EVs. On top of all this, we’re handing the keys to China to produce EV batteries, while taxpayers foot the bill for hundreds of billions of dollars to fund it. This is not only flawed science and lousy policy but would also result in devastating environmental outcomes and economics.

    While EVs are an innovative technology that may be right for some consumers, they are not the solution for long-term and meaningful emissions reductions. They certainly should not be forced onto the American consumer by the federal government, nor should taxpayer dollars fund their production under the false guise of saving the planet.

    I am committed to standing up to onerous rules like this that threaten Americans’ consumer rights. I’m proud to share that this week, the U.S. House of Representatives passed H.J. Res 136, a Congressional Review Act (CRA), that I cosponsored to overturn the EPA’s asinine tailpipe vehicle emissions rule. CRAs are tools that Congress can utilize to protect Americans from overreaching rules issued by federal agencies, such as this one. H.J. Res 136 will be a major step in safeguarding our environment and defending Americans’ consumer choice. With the Passage of this CRA, we’re ensuring that American consumers – not the Biden-Harris EPA – decide for themselves what vehicle works best for their families.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI: Force for Good: UN’s Sustainable Development Goals at risk of being missed – 9 urgent actions needed to unlock progress as cost of SDG gap rises by 10% to US$112-136 trillion

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    • A new report from Force for Good – “Capital as a Force for Good: Shifting the Global Order Through the Mass Mobilization of Solutions” – finds urgent action is needed now to unlock progress and achieve the SDGs
    • It identifies ‘Nine Big Ideas’ that, if scaled globally, have the potential to unlock SDG progress from less than 66% today, to nearly 90% by the end of the decade, helping correct the annual SDG funding gap of US$14-17 trillion
    • Ideas include climate transition frameworks, AI-enabled connectivity, and universal digital financial services, through coordinated action across governments, the private sector and multi-lateral institutions, proposing a high-impact roll-out across the world

    LONDON, Sept. 23, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Force For Good: The world is failing to meet the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and urgent action is needed to unlock progress and overcome the growing annual SDG funding gap, which now stands at US$14-17 trillion, a new report from Force for Good finds, US$112-136 trillion in total, up 10%, due to the costs of global climate transition and development needs in the Global South.

    Today, only 16% of the goal’s 169 underlying targets are on track to be met by 2030, with 50% falling behind, and 30% regressing below their 2015 levels when the SDGs were kicked off, the report finds.

    Nine ‘Big Ideas’, including climate transition frameworks, AI-enabled connectivity, and universal digital financial services, if scaled globally, have the cumulative potential to progress SDG achievement to nearly 90%, from less than 66% today, reigniting exponential progress.

    “This report shows how the global order and the systems itself can be transformed by delivering solutions en masse across the planet, engaging everyone in this endeavour … By leveraging the strengths of governments, private companies, NGOS and mobilising the individual as an agent of change, we can create a sustainable, secure, and prosperous future,” said Ketan Patel, Chair of the Advisory Council.

    The world’s failure to meet the goals is being driven by a series of interrelated economic, political, geopolitical and environmental shocks – including the COVID-19 pandemic, the war in Ukraine and Gaza, the energy, cost-of-living and climate crises – interacting with one another to create a ‘polycrisis’ that is diverting attention and resources away from sustainable development.

    A mass and fast roll out of the ‘Nine Big Ideas’, sponsored by appropriate champions across government, private sector or multi-lateral institutions, working with the United Nations, can make a transformative impact on developing countries, while benefitting the global economy.

    While the mass mobilisation of solutions will take a global effort, the largest developing countries, particularly India, China, and Brazil, account for two-thirds of the world’s sustainable development potential. These countries represent the first wave of opportunity in a multi-wave project to realize the future faster.

    Meeting the SDGs is a crucial step for the world in the transition to the next era of human civilization, building a platform on which further breakthroughs and technologies can create a sustainable, secure and superior future.

    About Force for Good

    Force for Good’s mission is to mobilize capital, resources, and ideas as a force for good in the world at a time of profound change. The organization’s Capital as a Force for Good Initiative engages the world’s leading financial institutions and other stakeholders, to promote sustainable development through the deployment of capital and solutions to address global issues and enable the transition to a better future.

    The annual Capital as a Force for Good report, now in its fourth edition, is the result of collaboration with the United Nations and major global financial institutions, assessing the role of capital in addressing the world’s most pressing issues.

    Institutions actively engaged include Bank of America, BlackRock, Bridgewater Associates, Citi, Credit Suisse, Fidelity Investments, First Abu Dhabi Bank, GIC Singapore, Goldman Sachs, Great-West Lifeco, HDFC Bank, HSBC, Investec Group, Japan Post Holdings, JPMorgan Chase, Liberty Mutual Insurance Group, Lloyds Banking Group, Morgan Stanley, Nomura, Nordea, Northern Trust, OMERS, Putnam Investments, Schroders, State Street, UBS, Wellington, and others.

    For further details, please visit www.forcegood.org

    CONTACTS

    Force For Good Contact:
    Lesley Whittle
    Lesley.whittle@forcegood.org

    *ESG News is a proud supporter of Force for Good

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI Economics: Dispute panel established to review certain tax credits under US Inflation Reduction Act

    Source: World Trade Organization

    DS623: United States — Certain Tax Credits Under the Inflation Reduction Act

    China submitted its second request to establish a panel to determine whether certain tax credits under the United States Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) are in line with WTO rules. The United States said it was not in a position to agree to China’s first request in July, justifying its actions as necessary to combat climate change. China stated that the IRA’s subsidies favour US goods over imports, violating WTO rules prohibiting such discrimination.

    The United States expressed disappointment over China’s decision to pursue a panel request and reiterated that the IRA is its most significant step toward clean energy, aimed at ensuring secure and sustainable supply chains for a global clean energy future.

    The DSB agreed to the establishment of the panel. Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, Colombia, the European Union, Indonesia, Israel, Japan, Korea, Norway, the Russian Federation, Singapore, Switzerland, Thailand, Türkiye, the United Kingdom and Venezuela reserved their third party rights to participate in the panel proceedings.

    DS597: United States – Origin Marking Requirement (Hong Kong, China)

    For the 12th time, the United States raised the matter of the panel ruling in DS597 at a DSB meeting. The US said it was raising the matter again as a result of recent developments in Hong Kong, China regarding free speech and human rights. The US referred back to its previous statements regarding its position on essential security and its reasons for placing this item on the DSB agenda.

    Hong Kong, China criticized the US for once again raising this matter at the DSB. It referred to previous WTO panels that dismissed US claims that invoking national security in defense of a trade-restrictive measure is entirely self-judging.  Any objections should be heard by the WTO’s Appellate Body, which remains blocked due to the US refusal to allow appointment of new Appellate Body members, said Hong Kong, China.

    China reiterated its firm belief that a restored appeal mechanism is the proper place to address claims of panel error made by the US and rejected in the strongest terms what it said was US interference in the internal affairs of another WTO member.

    Appellate Body appointments

    Speaking on behalf of 130 members, Colombia introduced for the 79th time the group’s proposal to start the selection processes for filling vacancies on the Appellate Body. The extensive number of members submitting the proposal reflects a common interest in the functioning of the Appellate Body and, more generally, in the functioning of the WTO’s dispute settlement system, Colombia said.

    The United States repeated that it does not support the proposed decision to commence the appointment of Appellate Body members as its longstanding concerns with WTO dispute settlement remain unaddressed.

    Twenty members then took the floor to comment. Many of these members referred to their previous statements made on this matter at earlier DSB meetings and underlined the urgent need to meet the mandates set out at the 12th and 13th Ministerial Conferences in 2022 and early 2024 respectively to conduct discussions with the view to having a fully and well-functioning dispute settlement system accessible to all members by 2024.

    Several members welcomed the progress being made in the formal dispute settlement reform process now underway and the need to accelerate discussions to achieve the 2024 goal.

    Colombia, speaking on behalf of the 130 members, said it regretted that for the 79th occasion members have not been able to launch the selection processes. Ongoing conversations about reform of the dispute settlement system should not prevent the Appellate Body from continuing to operate fully, and members shall comply with their obligation under the DSU to fill the vacancies as they arise, Colombia said for the group.

    The DSB chair, Ambassador Saqer Abdullah Almoqbel (Saudi Arabia), concluded by expressing his full support for the facilitator in the dispute settlement reform discussions, Ambassador Usha Dwarka-Canabady of Mauritius, in her efforts towards achieving a positive outcome within the mandated time frame.

    Other business

    Surveillance of implementation

    The United States presented status reports with regard to DS184, “US — Anti-Dumping Measures on Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Products from Japan”,  DS160, “United States — Section 110(5) of US Copyright Act”, DS464, “United States — Anti-Dumping and Countervailing Measures on Large Residential Washers from Korea”, and DS471, “United States — Certain Methodologies and their Application to Anti-Dumping Proceedings Involving China.”

    The European Union presented a status report with regard to DS291, “EC — Measures Affecting the Approval and Marketing of Biotech Products.”

    Indonesia presented its status reports in DS477 and DS478, “Indonesia — Importation of Horticultural Products, Animals and Animal Products.” 

    Next meeting

    The next regular DSB meeting will take place on 28 October.

    Share

    MIL OSI Economics

  • MIL-OSI USA: Speaker Johnson: Congress Has an Obligation to the American People to Secure American Elections

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Representative Mike Johnson (LA-04)

    WASHINGTON — This morning, ahead of the House vote on a six month spending measure to avoid a government shutdown and protect American elections from noncitizen voting, Speaker Johnson joined Fox News’ Fox and Friends and CNBC’s Squawk Box to implore Congressional Democrats to protect American elections, highlight the 2025 GOP economic agenda, and detail plans to expand the investigative scope of the Task Force to Investigate the Assassination of President Trump.

    Click here to watch the full “Fox and Friends” interview

    Click here to watch the full “Squawk Box” interview

    On Congress’s responsibility to protect elections and fund the government:

    Listen, Congress has an immediate obligation to do two very important things. We have to keep the government funded, and we need to make sure that our elections are secure. And we have a vehicle today to do both things, because we owe that to the American people and because they demand it. We’re moving legislation today to have a continuing resolution to keep the government going for six months and to make sure that illegals cannot vote, noncitizens cannot vote in the upcoming election. It’s a number one issue around the country.

    On the GOP plan for economic growth:

    We implement the principles and the policies that we’ve always espoused, and that is less regulation and lower taxes. It’s a pretty simple formula, and it has a great result. So, we want to expand upon the Trump era tax cuts, and we want to do massive regulatory reform. One of the problems we have right now across the free market is that the federal government has been, these agencies have been weaponized against the industries they’re supposed to be assisting and regulating in a meaningful way. Under the Biden-Harris Administration, they have almost smothered the free market. I mean, it’s like the boot of government is on the neck of job creators and entrepreneurs and risk takers who are just trying to do their jobs, and they’ve made it almost impossible. So, we’re going to reverse that.

    If you get Republican leadership in the White House, the Senate and the House, unified government, we will put this thing on turbo. You will see massive regulatory reform. We have a great opportunity. The Supreme Court has overturned a Chevron doctrine. We have all the talk about political tailwinds in a moment of opportunity. That’s what we’ll see in the first quarter of next year, and you’re going to see a lot of change that I think will really incentivize more opportunity, more investment, more American manufacturing, detangle from China, get the border under control and stop the illegal immigration and stop the maddening government spending that’s been out of control for the last four years.

    On expanding the Task Force Investigating the Assassination of Donald Trump:

    I had that conversation with the White House yesterday. I called and demanded that President Trump receive the same level of protection that the sitting president does, because he is under such great threat. I mean, clearly, he’s the most threatened figure in American public life, and the Secret Service has an obligation to protect him, so they need to make every available asset assigned to him right now.

    President Trump and I have talked about this, and now I’ve talked about it with the White House. Now, they say they’re going to be cooperative, but they also say there’s a manpower issue. So, Congress is looking at every aspect of this. If we need to add additional funding, we will, but it’s difficult to go hire 2,500 new secret service agents in the next 48 days, right? So, they’re going to have to rely upon, in some cases, to fill the gaps local and state law enforcement. And so, we’re looking at every aspect. This job must be done. President Trump must be protected. 

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Chairman Arrington Holds “Cost of the Biden-Harris Energy Crisis” Hearing

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Jodey Arrington (TX-19)

     WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, House Budget Committee Chairman Jodey Arrington (TX-19) delivered opening remarks at the hearing The Cost of the Biden-Harris Energy Crisis.”

     

    Opening Statement as Delivered:

    “Our hearing today focuses on the fiscal cost and economic consequences of the Biden-Harris Administration’s failed economic and energy policies. Those costs have been significant and measurable, and the consequences have been manifold and dire.

    The whole government regulatory attack on conventional fuels, the increased taxes on oil and gas, and massive market-distorting green energy subsidies have choked the lifeblood of the greatest economy in the world. It’s also crushed our working families with a cost-of-living crisis, and it has compromised our national security by making the United States more reliant on foreign adversaries.

    The Biden-Harris Administration has issued 250 executive actions against one industry, an industry that employs 10 million people with high wage jobs and represents almost 10 percent of our total economy, and has had, no doubt, a positive impact on every facet of our daily lives by producing the most reliable, affordable, and abundant source of energy as a result of our God-given blessed resources and the most innovative and efficient energy industry operators.

    We have the strongest and most dynamic economy in the world. It’s why we have the greatest fighting force in the world, and it’s why we are the world’s superpower. But today, the failed energy policy is driven by what I believe is an extreme climate agenda that has undermined all of the above. It’s resulted in higher gas prices at the pump, as high as over $5 dollars, the highest we’ve ever seen and experienced in this country, on average, it’s been $1 dollar more per gallon in cost than the previous Administration.

    The cost of electricity has gone up now 25- 30 percent for families. The total consumption cost for average-income families is almost twice what it was in the previous administration. Policies have consequences, and that consequence for families is a whopping $1,700 per family per year. These costs on the economy and our consumers, the American people, are a direct result of the policies of the Biden-Harris Administration.

    On his first day in office, President Biden canceled the Keystone XL Pipeline, which would have saved us in transportation cost and safety, $50 billion but it didn’t stop there. It was all critical infrastructure in the links of the supply chain, from export terminals to permitting refineries and other pipelines. Biden-Harris’s moratorium on drilling on public lands will cost $33 billion in lost GDP and roughly 60,000 jobs. There have been overreaching and overburdening emission regulations coming out of the EPA. Think about the methane gas rule. We’ve seen a 66 percent reduction by the industry over the last several years in methane gas emissions.

    The EV mandate alone, the tailpipe emissions, cost $870 billion over roughly 20 years. They’ve depleted our strategic petroleum reserves to smooth off the edge of the spike in prices, and we’re now down with the strategic petroleum reserve at a 40-year low. On the subsidy side, there are $800 billion in tax subsidies for green energy corporations, and some studies say that 70 percent of that value will be accrued to China because of their rare earth mineral mining and parts to the renewable energy industry. The EV tax credit is, in many ways, going to upper-middle and upper-income individuals, and I want to dig into that with you. The impact on middle-class families and our minority communities here in the United States is hard. 

    The fiscal health of our country is in decline. I think we all agree with that. You can’t look at the balance sheet, you can’t look at CBO’s projections, you can’t look at the debt to GDP, which is higher than it’s been since World War II and more. We have to rein-in spending and we have to grow this economy. We must have policies that encourage and foster growth, and central to that are good energy policies. If we can grow 1 percent, we can save $3 trillion to put against the deficitIf we grow 1 percent, we can add $10,000 over 10 years and hardworking Americans’ pocketbooks. We can bring the debt to GDP down by at least 20 percentage points.

    Growth is key, and the lifeblood of that growth is energy policies. We’ve seen the opposite of it, disastrous energy policies and disastrous results. We must make a change if we’re going to get our country on a good fiscal path and hand it to our children in the manner that gives them the opportunities and prosperity that we’ve all enjoyed.”

     

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Deputy Administrator Isobel Coleman at the United Nations Development Program Event “Mobilizing Africa’s Sixth Region: Helping Educate and Skill Africa for the 21st Century”

    Source: USAID

    DEPUTY ADMINISTRATOR ISOBEL COLEMAN: Good afternoon. Thank you to our colleagues at UNDP for bringing us together today, and to our partners joining the discussion. 

    It’s a pleasure to be with you as we explore the promise of African-led innovation in education, technology, and entrepreneurship to drive global progress.

    All of us here today know that the African continent is a powerhouse of promise. This year, the continent is poised to be the world’s second fastest-growing region – Africa is home to 12 of the 20 fastest growing economies on the planet. 

    The African continent also boasts an exceptionally young and growing population, with 60 percent of its inhabitants under the age of 25, and by 2040, Africa will have the largest workforce in the world – larger than China and India combined.

    If we are going to achieve the SDGs and build the peaceful and prosperous world we all seek to advance, we must invest in harnessing that enormous potential. 

    This past March, I visited Atlanta to take part in the Phambili Trade and Innovation Event. While in Atlanta, I started discussing with Helene Gayle, the President of Spellman college, the potential for connecting American Historically Black Colleges and Universities, or HBCUs, with universities and colleges in Africa – harnessing cultural ties, and connecting young people pursuing careers in STEM on both sides of the world, empowering the next generation of students that could develop relationships and trade between the continent and the United States. 

    Since then, USAID has been in conversation with Spellman and other HBCUs about making this idea a reality, starting with one class that could count toward the HBCU students’ college degrees. 

    The idea blossomed, and in May of this year, USAID officially announced the launch of this program during the official visit of Kenyan President Ruto to the United States.

    EdTech Africa will pilot in Kenya featuring a select cohort of students from two to three HBCUs in the United States – Howard University and the Atlanta University Consortium – and three Kenyan Universities – University of Nairobi, University of Embu, and the Open University of Kenya – focusing on data science.

    In addition to academic coursework, the partnership will provide workforce development training in association which will require a collaborative project as a capstone to the class. 

    They will also participate in an entrepreneurship bootcamp in Atlanta sponsored by Mastercard and project based work sponsored by Microsoft at their Microsoft Africa Research Institute in Nairobi. 

    This hands-on approach will equip students with the skills and knowledge needed to succeed in today’s competitive job market. 

    This is just the first partnership under EdTech Africa that will develop enduring connections with industry and between African and U.S. institutions focused on technology research and development and private-sector job growth. 

    The EdTech Africa initiative is poised to make a significant impact at a time when Africa is experiencing rapid digital transformation characterized by technological advancements, increased connectivity, and emerging job opportunities. 

    To thrive in this new digital landscape, a safe and secure ecosystem is essential, and the EdTech Africa initiative will contribute to building such an environment. 

    The United States is eager to partner with Africa to uplift the next generation of innovative, African-led solutions – helping generate broadly shared opportunity and prosperity that benefits families and communities across the continent, and sustainable growth that benefits economies across the world. 

    These are just a few of the ways USAID is investing in Africa’s future. 

    But we know our work is not done. 

    The African continent is teeming with potential to drive the next generation of global progress, and now, it’s up to all of us – governments, partner countries, UN organizations, and the private sector – to invest in that potential.

    Thank you.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI: Nano Labs Announces Annual General Meeting

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    HANGZHOU, China, Sept. 23, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Nano Labs Ltd (Nasdaq: NA) (“we,” “the Company,” or “Nano Labs”), a leading fabless integrated circuit design company and product solution provider in China, today announced that it will hold its 2024 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders (the “2024 Annual Meeting”) at 10 A.M. on October 23, 2024, Beijing time (10 P.M. on October 22, 2024, U.S. Eastern time) in China Yuangu Hanggang Technology Building, 509 Qianjiang Road, Shangcheng District, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310000, People’s Republic of China. The Company has established the close of business on September 27, 2024, Eastern time (the “Record Date”), as the record date for determining shareholders entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Meeting and any adjournments or postponements thereof. The purpose of the Meeting is:

    (1) to effect a share consolidation of every ten shares with a par value of US$0.0002 each in the Company’s issued and unissued share capital into one share with a par value of US$0.002 (the “Share Consolidation”), so that immediately following the Share Consolidation and the Share Re-designation, the authorized share capital of the Company shall be US$50,000 divided into 25,000,000 ordinary shares of par value of US$0.002 each, comprising (i) 12,141,093 Class A ordinary shares of par value of US$0.002 each, (ii) 2,858,908 Class B ordinary shares of par value of US$0.002 each, and (iii) 9,999,999 shares of a par value of US$0.002 each of such class or classes (however designated) as the board of directors of the Company (the “Directors”) may determine in accordance with the Company’s New M&A (as defined below).

    (2) to amend the Company’s memorandum and articles of association currently in effect (the “Current M&A”) by the adoption of a new memorandum and articles of association to reflect the Share Consolidation (after the amendment, the “New M&A”); and

    (3) to approve the appointment of MaloneBailey, LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2024.

    Subject to obtaining the relevant shareholders’ approval at the Meeting, the Share Consolidation will be effective at 5 P.M. on October 29, 2024, U.S. Eastern time, and the Class A ordinary shares are expected to begin trading on a post-Share Consolidation basis on the Nasdaq Capital Market when markets open on the next business trading day under the new CUSIP/ISIN numbers. No fractional shares will be issued in connection with the Share Consolidation. All fractional shares will be rounded up to the whole number of shares. Copies of the notice of the Meeting and the form of proxy are available on the Company’s corporate investor relations website at https://ir.nano.cn.

    About Nano Labs Ltd

    Nano Labs Ltd is a leading fabless integrated circuit (“IC”) design company and product solution provider in China. Nano Labs is committed to the development of high throughput computing (“HTC”) chips, high performance computing (“HPC”) chips, distributed computing and storage solutions, smart network interface cards (“NICs”) vision computing chips and distributed rendering. Nano Labs has built a comprehensive flow processing unit (“FPU”) architecture which offers solution that integrates the features of both HTC and HPC. Nano Lab’s Cuckoo series are one of the first near-memory HTC chips available in the market*. For more information, please visit the Company’s website at: ir.nano.cn.

    *According to an industry report prepared by Frost & Sullivan.

    Forward-Looking Statements

    This report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and as defined in the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements include, without limitation, the Company’s plan to appeal the Staff’s determination, which can be identified by terminology such as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “aim,” “estimate,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe,” “potential,” “continue,” “is/are likely to” or other similar expressions. Such statements are based upon management’s current expectations and current market and operating conditions, and relate to events that involve known or unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, all of which are difficult to predict and many of which are beyond the Company’s control, which may cause the Company’s actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements. Further information regarding these and other risks, uncertainties or factors is included in the Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company does not undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statement as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required under law.

    For investor inquiries, please contact:

    Nano Labs Ltd
    ir@nano.cn

    Ascent Investor Relations LLC
    Tina Xiao
    Phone: +1-646-932-7242
    Email: investors@ascent-ir.com

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI USA: Dingell Statement on Commerce Proposed Rulemaking on Connected Vehicles

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Congresswoman Debbie Dingell (12th District of Michigan)

    Congresswoman Debbie Dingell (MI-06) released the following statement on the Department of Commerce’s Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) that would prohibit the sale or import of connected vehicles integrating specific pieces of hardware and software, or those components sold separately, with a sufficient nexus to the People’s Republic of China or Russia.

    “As our vehicles become smarter, safer, and increasingly connected, it’s important we’re taking action to mitigate security risks, especially when this technology is coming from countries of concern, like China and Russia. An investigation by the Department of Commerce concluded that technology from these adversarial countries poses a real risk both to consumers and to American infrastructure. For example, we know that Chinese automakers are deploying autonomous vehicles in the U.S. for surveillance and data collection, meanwhile banning American vehicles from their own streets. Today’s NPRM is an important step to combat the real threat this poses. We must maintain our leadership at the forefront of the global auto industry in a way that protects Americans’ privacy and safety and strengthens our national security.”

    The proposed rule focuses on hardware and software integrated into the Vehicle Connectivity System (VCS) and software integrated into the Automated Driving System (ADS). These are the critical systems that, through specific hardware and software, allow for external connectivity and autonomous driving capabilities in connected vehicles. Malicious access to these systems could allow adversaries to access and collect our most sensitive data and remotely manipulate cars on American roads. The proposed rule would apply to all wheeled on-road vehicles such as cars, trucks, and buses, but would exclude vehicles not used on public roads like agricultural or mining vehicles.

    The rule would also prohibit manufacturers with a nexus to the PRC or Russia from selling connected vehicles that incorporate VCS hardware or software or ADS software in the United States, even if the vehicle was made in the United States.

    The prohibitions on software would take effect for Model Year 2027 and the prohibitions on hardware would take effect for Model Year 2030, or January 1, 2029 for units without a model year.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: White  House Press Call by Senior Adviser to the President and Director of Communications Ben LaBolt, National Climate Adviser Ali Zaidi, and Senior Adviser to the President for International Climate Policy John Podesta Previewing Climate Week  Speech

    US Senate News:

    Source: The White House
    Via Teleconference
    9:47 A.M. EDT
    MR. FERNÁNDEZ HERNÁNDEZ:  Hi.  Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining today’s press call to preview President Biden’s speech at the Bloomberg Global Business Forum tomorrow and on the pre- — and on the Biden-Harris administration’s historic efforts to combat climate change.
    As a reminder, this call will be on the record and embargoed until today at 1:00 p.m. Eastern.
    The call will begin with on-the-record remarks from Senior Adviser to the President and White House Director of Communications Ben LaBolt, White House National Climate Adviser Ali Zaidi, and Senior Adviser to the President for International Climate Policy John Podesta.
    Afterwards, we will have an — a question-and-answer period.
    With that, I will turn it over to Ben.
    MR. LABOLT:  Thanks, Angelo, and good morning, everybody.
    President Biden is fresh off his Quad Summit, where he showcased his continued leadership on the world stage by bringing our allies together to cooperate on — on major cross-border issues.  He just delivered a major speech last Thursday on the economic progress we’ve seen under — under this administration.  And later today, he’s heading to New York to the U.N. General Assembly.
    He’s got a busy schedule in New York, and you’ll see him lay out his vision for continued U.S. leadership on the world stage, including renewed cooperation to address shared global challenges such as confronting the climate crisis.
    And as the president continues to sprint to the finish line, tomorrow, as part of Climate Week, he’ll deliver remarks highlighting his and Vice President Harris’ leadership to tackle the climate crisis.
    His speech tomorrow at the Bloomberg Global Business Forum will showcase just how transformational this administration has been in helping to meet all of our climate, conservation, and clean energy goals — from reducing emissions and moving in the long term to a net-zero economy, to mobilizing private-sector investments in domestic manufacturing, to protecting our lands and waters, and so much more.
    And of course, through each of those important goals, also making significant in pro- — progress along the way to lower families’ energy costs; create good-paying union job; and ultimately leave for our children and grandchildren a stronger, healthier planet.
    Ali and John will share a bit more about the president’s domestic and international climate legacy in just a moment, but I want to take a moment to highlight how important the stakes are and why the president’s efforts have been essential in making sure we stay on track for our climate goals.
    If, as the science demands, we are going to meet the president’s goal of achieving net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by no later than 2050 and of limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius, then we’ve got to keep the pedal to the metal on our climate efforts.  We cannot afford to delay or to go back. 
    We’re seeing the impacts the climate crisis is having on our communities every day.  Yet as cities are flooding or on fire or under extreme heat watches or trapped in a cloud of smog, many congressional Republicans continue to deny the very existence of climate change.
    And it’s not just talk.  Congressional Republicans are taking action right now that would roll back investments in climate, clean energy, and public health.
    In this session alone, congressional Republicans’ efforts to gut climate protections are being pushed through a variety of avenues, including appropriations bills, Congressional Review Act resolutions, and other legislative actions, which would have a devastating impact on families, the economy, and the environment. 
    From undermining clean vehicle tax credits to attacking cost-saving efficiency standards, they continue to side with special interests to keep consumer energy prices high.
    During this session, congressional Republicans have advanced legislation to repeal new programs from President Biden’s Investing in America agenda that are helping families save hundreds of dollars each year on energy costs, including attacking new rebate programs for energy-efficient home upgrades and programs that support residential solar projects in low-income communities.
    After the president’s historic work to enhance public health protections and strengthen pollution standards, congressional Republicans are working to weaken those protections, which would harm their constituents’ lives and livelihoods.
    They’ve introduced resolutions that would roll back the administration’s rules that protect communities from coal plants’ water pollution, air pollution, and waste disposal.  They’re working to overturn lifesaving rules under the Clean Air Act that reduce pollution from power plants, cars, trucks, and indus- — and industrial sources.  And they’re failing to protect the health of mine workers, including by trying to block new rules that protect coal and other miners from toxic exposures.
    With more than 42 million acres already conserved, President Biden is on track to conserve more lands and waters than any modern president has in four years.  But congressional Republicans are attempting to roll back protections for our nation’s outdoor treasures and open up our lands and waters to increased irresponsible development.
    They’re trying to eliminate presidential authority to establish national monuments altogether.  They’re also trying to dismantle President Biden’s America the Beautiful initiative, which is supporting locally led conservation efforts across the country, and to overturn the administration’s Public Lands Rule that will help conserve wildlife habitat, restore places impacted by wildfire and drought, expand outdoor recreation, and guide thoughtful and balanced development.
    They’re supporting legislation and other appropriations vehicles that would undo protections for 13 million acres of special areas in the Western Arctic and dismantle efforts to protect the U.S. Arctic Ocean and Arctic National Wildlife Refuge from new oil and gas leasing.
    The Biden-Harris administration successfully finalized the first updates in decades to hold oil and gas companies accountable and ensure they provide fair returns to taxpayers, but congressional Republicans are seeking to overturn these overdue reforms.
    And just to put a finer point on it: Since President Biden signed the Inflation Reduction Act, congressional Republicans have voted more than 50 times to repeal all or parts of the largest and most impactful climate legislation in history.
    Yet even though most Republicans are in lock- — lockstep in this approach, some are starting to change their tune.  Last month, 18 House Republicans sent a letter to Speaker Johnson asking him not to repeal the Inflation Reduction Act.
    Perhaps it’s because President’s Biden’s policies are leading to more than 330,000 new clean energy jobs already created, more than half of which are in Republican-held districts.
    It also might be because they’re starting to realize that jacking up families’ energy prices, weakening pollution protections, and slowing our clean energy transition are unpopular back home.
    Whatever the reason, it’s obvious that the contrast between President Biden and Kamala Harris’ policies with those of congressional Republicans couldn’t be clearer.
    This coming Climate Week and for every week thereafter, this president and his team will continue to work on behalf of the American people to protect our planet, lower energy costs, create good-paying jobs, and do what’s needed to ensure that our grandchildren can experience a planet with clean air and drinkable water.
    And with that, I’ll turn it over to the president’s national climate adviser, Ali Zaidi.
    MR. ZAIDI:  Thanks so much to everybody for joining.
    We are five years into what the UNFCCC declared as the “decisive decade for climate action.”  Tomorrow, President Biden will deliver the decisive decade halftime report.  And what he will show is how the United States has changed the playbook fundamentally — not focused on the doom and gloom, focused instead on the massive economic opportunity, a chance to build U.S. manufacturing and infrastructure, and a chance to build the American middle class.
    The president will talk about what we’re seeing on the scoreboard.  Since the start of the administration, 100 gigawatts of clean energy built in the United States — 25 million homes’ worth of power.  You see off our coast an offshore industry, where before there was none. 
    In rural America, the largest investment in clean energy electrification since FDR — one in five rural Americans seeing the benefits of that clean energy. 
    A nuclear industry revitalized — plants that were slated to be shut down put back into use; plants retired coming back to meet surging demand.
    In transportation, electric vehicles now quadrupled in sales, chargers doubled on our roads and highways, the postal service going fully electric, and all of that being made in America — batteries being made in America; anodes, cathodes, the very critical minerals necessary for tackling climate change being sourced here in the United States of America.
    And, of course, we’re seeing this translate into benefits for consumers.  The standards the president has finalized or more efficient appliances saving a trillion dollars for consumers over the next several decades.
    And just last year, millions of Americans taking advantage of the Biden-Harris clean energy tax credits to retrofit their homes, put in upgrades that will save them money, lower utility bills and costs. 
    He’s done all of this while protecting the environment.  As Ben noted, 42 million acres conserved by tackling the scrooge [scourge] of environmental injustice, meeting pollution where it is in fence-line communities, and delivering solutions that take effect right away.
    He’s made sure that we are leaning into the manufacturing opportunity in all of this.  He’s going to talk about how we invented a lot of these technologies, but over the last several years, we’ve now started to actually make these technologies — $900 billion in manufacturing.
    So, you see because of these historic efforts under President Biden, Vice President Harris, capital coming off the sidelines, jobs coming back, and America leading on climate.  And, you know, core to that — core to that is the president delivering on his fundamental conviction.
    When he was running for office, the president often said, “When I see climate, I see jobs.”  Since the beginning of his administration, he’s made that a focal point in climate.  It’s what’s helped us put all these points on the board.  Even today, governors will come together to announce a goal to train another million folks into registered apprenticeships that deliver on the climate workforce that we need to build this clean energy future.
    Tomorrow is an opportunity to deliver that decisive decade halftime report to show the progress we’ve made, the points we put on the board, and the path ahead.  And President Biden will do that eloquently and in a way, I think, that will hopefully activate and animate accelerated action not just here but around the world.
    And for that, let me hand it over to my partner in all of this, the president’s international climate adviser, John Podesta.
    MR. PODESTA:  Thanks, Ali.  And — and thanks to everyone for joining at the beginning of this action-packed Climate Week.  And if you’re actually in New York, the traffic-packed Climate Week.
    Over the past four years, President Biden and Vice President Harris have pursued the most ambitious and successful climate agenda in history, both domestically and internationally.
    We know that the climate crisis is a global problem and that no one country alone can solve it but that U.S. leadership on this issue is critical for bringing the world together.
    That’s why President Biden rejoined the Paris Agreement on day — day one.  It’s why he set a bold goal to cut U.S. emissions by 50 to 52 percent below 2005 levels by 2030 and backed that goal up with action through the Inflation Reduction Act, the largest investment in climate and clean energy in the world, as Ali just went through.  And it’s why he convened three leaders summits on climate, ratified the Kigali Amendment to the Mo- — Montreal Protocol to phase down super-polluting hydrofluorocarbons.
    Over the past four years, this resurgence of U.S. leadership on global climate action has yielded real results.
    We’ve raised ambition from countries and companies around the world through the Global Methane Pledge to reduce global methane emissions 30 percent by 2030, with now 158 countries and the EU signing on.
    At COP28 in Dubai in December 2023, the United States successfully galvanized the world to commit, for the first time, to transition away from unabated fossil fuels; to stop building new unabated coal capacity globally; to triple renewable energy globally by 2030, to double the level of efficiency by 2030, and to triple nuclear energy by 2050.
    We’ve remained focused on climate finance, which is the biggest topic of discussion at this year’s COP29 in Azerbaijan.
    President Biden pledged to work with Congress to quadruple U.S. international public climate finance to over $11 billion per year by 2024.  And we’re on track to deliver on that commitment.  That includes over $3 billion per year for adaptation under the president’s Emergency Plan for Adaptation and Resilience, or the so-called PREPARE program, which will help a half a billion people worldwide adapt to and manage climate impacts, including sea level rise, storms, droughts, and food insecurity. 
    The next few months are crucial for our international climate agenda — from COP16 on biodiversity in Cali to the G20 in Rio to COP29 in Baku, and, of course, this week in New York.
    This week and throughout this fall, we’ll continue to work with our allies and partners around the world to raise ambitions; unlock additional climate finance from the private sector, multilateral development banks, and public sources; accelerate the deployment of clean energy by driving innovation and lowering costs; reversing and finally ending deforestation; and help more vulnerable countries and communities adapt to a changing climate.
    Here’s the bottom line: Thanks to President Biden and Vice President Harris, we’re on the right path here in the U.S. and around the world.  We have to accelerate our progress toward our collective climate goals, and I think the president will be calling on other leaders of the world, as he did over the weekend in the new announcements on clean cooling and the clean energy industrial fellowship we entered into with India, to get that job done.
    Thank you.  And I’ll turn it back over to Angelo.
    MR. FERNÁNDEZ HERNÁNDEZ:  Thanks, John.  And we will move to the question-and-answer portion.  Please use the “raise hand” function on Zoom, and we will call on you.  As you are called on, please identify yourself and your outlet.
    Okay, we will begin with Lisa.  You should be unmuted now.
    Q    Hi, everyone.  Thank you so much for doing this this morning.
    John, you mentioned that the president will be calling on — on other leaders.  You know, this is a very international audience this week.  Already, countries have seen the United States leave and join and leave and join global efforts to fight climate change.  What will the president’s message be to world leaders who are worried about what a Trump administration would bring on climate and maybe don’t know whether the U.S. can be trusted to be a long-term partner?
    I guess, related, do you expect President Biden to — to speak directly about former President Trump?
    MR. PODESTA:  Lisa, you know, in my current role, I can’t talk about politics.  (Laughs.)  But I think it’s clear that the track record from the previous administration vers- — which pulled out of Paris, abandoned the — the partnership that we had around the globe, reversed a number of actions that President Obama had taken on climate change versus the record that we just laid out is clearly of concern and interest to people around the world.
    All I can tell you is the president has demonstrated that you can produce strong economic growth, create good-paying jobs, reach all areas of the country in this — in this task of decarbonizing our economy. 
    And that’s the message I think he’s sending to global re- — leaders: This is doable.  We can invest in the — these new technologies.  We can put people to work doing the work that needs to be done, and it’s going to be good for your publics.
    So, I think that in — in his speech to — to UNGA, he will, I think, reflect on that record, and I’m sure the — the alternatives will be implicit.
    MR. ZAIDI:  Look, what I’d add to that — this is Ali — is you’ve seen the politics of climate inaction deteriorate in Congress.  House Republicans have put up nearly 50 votes to roll back President Biden and Vice President Harris’ historic climate efforts.  They failed.  They failed even within their own caucus: Now a dozen and a half members calling on their own leadership to wrap up these efforts, to go in a U-turn direction, because they see the economic case for climate action.
    Part of the reason the president has been successful — and as he speaks to this tomorrow, he will point out — is this new formula on climate action, which is focused on driving investment in U.S. manufacturing and U.S. infrastructure, and that has resulted in unprecedented and successful job creation all across the country in blue districts and in red.
    So, the politics of inaction are deteriorating.  The case for a U-turn is weak and fragile and falling apart.  But the haste to go bold and accelerate climate action, we’re seeing the results from that; that’s strengthening.
    And, you know, Lisa, you mentioned, there are a lot of leaders from around the world here in New York.  There are also a lot of leaders from industry and big investors here in New York, and they’re paying attention to one thing and one thing only, and that is: In the United States, the case for investing in clean energy has never been stronger.  The economics for climate action are irresistible here in the United States.  And that’s going to cascade around the world as we accelerate progress in this decisive decade.
    MR. FERNÁNDEZ HERNÁNDEZ:  Thanks, Ali.  We will go to Kemi next.  You should be unmuted now.
    Q    Hello.  Can you guys hear me?  Hello?
    MR. FERNÁNDEZ HERNÁNDEZ:  Yes.
    Q    Okay.  Thank you.  Sorry.  En route to New York. 
    I wanted to ask if you can talk about the multilateral (inaudible) boosting climate financing for developing countries as well as how the U.S., the administration will work with China, the number one polluters in the world.  As — and your initiative also working with African nations. 
    Thank you.
    MR. PODESTA:  Well, thanks — thanks for the question.  I — at the bilateral level, I laid out a — at the front end of my remarks, the president’s commitment to increasing climate finance across the board and reach communities across the globe. 
    We’ve succeeded in — in meeting the targets that the president did at — in his UNGA speech in 2021.  I want to underscore that.  That’s where he said we will quadruple our climate finance from the historically high level that President Obama produced.  It was actually substantially more than that if you compare it to the last years under President Trump.  And we’re on track to do that.
    Where I’m engaged in events here to try to track additional private-sector investment into the adaptation space, noting — I noted the PREPARE program that the president has put forward, which is going to provide a — help and service to half a billion people across the globe. 
    We’re engaged, I think, with the — the i- — the discussion right now to increase the national cumulative qualified goal that’s, as I noted, part of what’s most important on the agenda in Baku.  Those conversations are continuing, but we’ve seen a substantial increase in climate finance coming through the multilateral development banks and other sources. 
    It’s going to take the effort of all of us to go from the billions of dollars of — hundreds of billions of dollars of public support that we’ve seen to, really, the trillion dollars of need that are necessary to build sustainable energy systems across the globe. 
    And so, I think, again, in his conversations with — with global leaders, he hosted President Ruto of Kenya earlier this year, created a commitment to a bilateral partnership with the government of Kenya to build out supply chains there.  We’re working with India and Tanzania to do the same thing across new supply chains in Africa. 
    So, I think the president is r- — is quite focused on this and will get a chance to speak to it both in the meetings that he’s holding on the side as well as in his main UNGA speech.
    Q    Okay.  If I can just quickly follow up on that.  A lot of these developing countries are looking into carbon market.  What is your response?  What is your view regarding that? 
    MR. PODESTA:  You know, earlier this summer, we issued a joint statement from the U.S. government on our views on the fact that those high-integrity carbon markets are a potentially strong source of finance for countries both to decarbonize the power sector.  Secretary Kerry did a tremendous work on creating a new instrument, if you will, in that space as well as in — in agriculture and forestry. 
    But as we noted in that statement, there’s — there needs to be high integrity both on behalf of the sellers of carbon credits as well as on behalf of buyers in order to make these — these markets work and — and see those — that ability for carbon finance to flow through that channel.  Without that, I think the market and — and I think we saw this in the last couple of years — it begins to lose faith that those — that the emissions reductions are real.  In which case, I think people back off from making the commitments. 
    So, I think it’s really critical to make sure that these markets are — have strong integrity, and we laid out the principles to make that happen. 
    MR. ZAIDI:  I just want to add a little bit on how domestic action is, I think, enabling more ambition around the world.
    First, there has been analysis, including from the Boston Consulting Group, on the impacts of the Inflation Reduction Act in terms of technology cost reduction that actually improve the odds of scale-up around the world — everything from battery technology to clean hydrogen production through electrolyzers. 
    That technology is being de-risked as a result of the generational investment that President Biden has marshaled to take on the climate crisis here in the United States. 
    That’s going to have very significant implications around the world.  One modeling projection done by the Rhodium Group shows that for every ton reduced here, we will see two or three reduced around the world, again, as the result of that technology de-risking. 
    The second is the platform de-risking.  John talked about the voluntary carbon markets and the principles we laid out earlier this summer to help high-integrity scale-up of that platform. 
    The investment the United States is making, for example, through the Department of Agriculture in measurement, monitoring, and verification regimes, or through the EPA and the Department of Energy in the utilization of satellite data to track methane leaks from industrial sources — those investments in satellite, in harnessing machine learning and artificial intelligence to take on climate change — those platform investments will de-risk those platforms for the rest of the world and I think help bring additional resources to the Global South. 
    And then there’s the role of the capital markets more broadly.  In the United States, we are building muscle memory around new asset classes, and that’s going to accrue benefits to capital formation and project development all around the world. 
    So, look, there is the — there is the effort, I think, underway by G20 countries.  The*28:59 — when the president was out at the last G20, he said, “I passed an Inflation Reduction Act.  You should copycat that.”  So, there are a lot of countries that are downloading the U.S. playlist on how to jam out on climate. 
    But there’s a second piece of it, which is the actions we’re taking here in the United States are de-risking technologies, they’re de-risking platforms, and they’re building the muscle memory to accelerate capital formation project development around the world. 
    Obviously, that all complements the very important development finance and multilateral work — work John talked about, but I do think this work domestically is going to echo around the world.
    MR. FERNÁNDEZ HERNÁNDEZ:  Thanks, Ali. 
    And our final question will come from Robin.  You should be unmuted now.
    Q    Hi.  Can you hear me?
    MR. FERNÁNDEZ HERNÁNDEZ:  Yes. 
    Q    Thanks so much for taking my call.  I wondered if you could tell us — I know the president told his Cabinet to “sprint to the finish.”  I wonder if you can tell us what that’s going to mean on climate, if there’s anything else we can expect — big announcements on climate before the end of the term, and also how he’s thinking about climate when he’s approaching his legacy?
    MR. ZAIDI:  Robin, I think the president is thinking about climate the same way he has been from day one.  When he thinks climate, he thinks jobs.  And I know that sounds simple, but I think that’s been the driver of the political economy and the investment case around the country, and that continues to be the case. 
    You know, you’ll — you’ll see from the administration what you’ve seen from day one: a concerted focus on a sector-by-sector basis, each part of the economy.
    In terms of developing new standards and rules that provide certainty to business and improve the investment climate around clean energy technologies, you will continue to see robust implementation from our agencies on the infrastructure law and the Inflation Reduction Act.  On the broader investment agenda, making sure that those investments are turning in to impacts on the ground.
    And you’ll see us do the important work of blocking and tackling to make sure our projects are getting built.  Permitting, citing execution has been a focal point for the Biden-Harris administration from day one. 
    You know, this Cabinet meeting, the president talked about sprinting through the finish line, making sure that we’re building an irreversible momentum behind climate action.  But I remember the last Cabinet meeting when he reminded the Cabinet that these laws, these standards, these investments were only as good as the impact they were making on the ground.  So, he continues to be relentlessly focused on implementation, on execution, on getting things built. 
    And that goes to the point I made at the top.  This is no longer a theoretical playbook.  You could see it as points on the scoreboard today: A hundred gigawatts of clean energy built in the United States under the Biden-Harris administration.  That’s going to be our focus.  That’s where we continue to spend our time.
    MR. FERNÁNDEZ HERNÁNDEZ:  Thanks, Ali. 
    And that is all the time we have today.  Thank you, again, to our speakers and to all of you for joining.
    As a reminder, this call and the materials you all received over email or will receive over email will be embargoed until 1:00 P.M. Eastern today.
    Thanks again for joining us. 
    10:20 A.M. EDT

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: Union Finance Minister Smt. Nirmala Sitharaman will embark on an official visit to Uzbekistan from 24th to 28th Sept. 2024

    Source: Government of India

    Union Finance Minister Smt. Nirmala Sitharaman will embark on an official visit to Uzbekistan from 24th to 28th Sept. 2024

    Union Finance Minister will attend 9th Annual Meeting of Board of Governors of AIIB during the visit

    Smt. Sitharaman will also sign Bilateral Investment Treaty (BIT) between India and Uzbekistan

    The Union Finance Minister will hold important bilateral meetings with her counterparts from Uzbekistan, Qatar, China, and AIIB President

    Posted On: 23 SEP 2024 6:35PM by PIB Delhi

    Union Minister for Finance and Corporate Affairs Smt. Nirmala Sitharaman will embark on an official visit to Uzbekistan from 24thto 28thSeptember, 2024. The Union Finance Minister will lead the Indian delegation of officials from the Ministry of Finance.

     

    During the visit, Smt. Sitharaman will attend the Ninth Annual Meeting of Board of Governors of Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) scheduled in Samarkand on 25thand 26thSeptember 2024, besides other important bilateral meetings with her counterparts from Uzbekistan, Qatar, China, and AIIB President.

    In the Annual Meeting of AIIB, the Union Finance Minister will attend as the Indian Governor to the AIIB. India is the second largest shareholder of the bank. The multilateral discussions centred around a broad spectrum of important global issues relevant to the development agenda.

    As part of the official visit, the Union Finance Minister is expected to call-on H.E Shavkat Mirziyoyev, President of Uzbekistan.

    During the visit, the Union Finance Minister will sign a Bilateral Investment Treaty (BIT) between India and Uzbekistan. The BIT will be signed by the Union Finance Minister and Uzbekistan Minister for Investment, Industry and Trade. The treaty aims to promote more extensive economic cooperation for the mutual benefit of both countries on a long-term basis.

    The Union Finance Minister will also participate in the India-Uzbekistan Business forum discussions, jointly organised as well as represented by industry captains from both the countries.

    Besides the above engagement, Smt. Sitharaman will also visit the Samarkand State University and Lal Bahadur Shastri Monument in Tashkent. The Union Finance Minister will also interact with Indian diaspora representing leading voices from multiple sectors.

    About AIIB and Annual Meetings

    The AIIB Annual Meeting witnesses’ participation of delegations from around 80 countries, and other international organisations. As a multilateral development bank, AIIB is focused on developing sustainable infrastructure in Asia and in promoting investments in infrastructure and other productive sectors with a view to foster sustainable economic development, create wealth and improve infrastructure connectivity.

    ****

    NB/KMN

    (Release ID: 2057978) Visitor Counter : 80

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News

  • MIL-OSI USA News: White  House Press Call by Senior Adviser to the President and Director of Communications Ben LaBolt, National Climate Adviser Ali Zaidi, and Senior Adviser to the President for International Climate Policy John Podesta Previewing Climate Week  Speech

    Source: The White House

    Via Teleconference

    9:47 A.M. EDT

    MR. FERNÁNDEZ HERNÁNDEZ:  Hi.  Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining today’s press call to preview President Biden’s speech at the Bloomberg Global Business Forum tomorrow and on the pre- — and on the Biden-Harris administration’s historic efforts to combat climate change.

    As a reminder, this call will be on the record and embargoed until today at 1:00 p.m. Eastern.

    The call will begin with on-the-record remarks from Senior Adviser to the President and White House Director of Communications Ben LaBolt, White House National Climate Adviser Ali Zaidi, and Senior Adviser to the President for International Climate Policy John Podesta.

    Afterwards, we will have an — a question-and-answer period.

    With that, I will turn it over to Ben.

    MR. LABOLT:  Thanks, Angelo, and good morning, everybody.

    President Biden is fresh off his Quad Summit, where he showcased his continued leadership on the world stage by bringing our allies together to cooperate on — on major cross-border issues.  He just delivered a major speech last Thursday on the economic progress we’ve seen under — under this administration.  And later today, he’s heading to New York to the U.N. General Assembly.

    He’s got a busy schedule in New York, and you’ll see him lay out his vision for continued U.S. leadership on the world stage, including renewed cooperation to address shared global challenges such as confronting the climate crisis.

    And as the president continues to sprint to the finish line, tomorrow, as part of Climate Week, he’ll deliver remarks highlighting his and Vice President Harris’ leadership to tackle the climate crisis.

    His speech tomorrow at the Bloomberg Global Business Forum will showcase just how transformational this administration has been in helping to meet all of our climate, conservation, and clean energy goals — from reducing emissions and moving in the long term to a net-zero economy, to mobilizing private-sector investments in domestic manufacturing, to protecting our lands and waters, and so much more.

    And of course, through each of those important goals, also making significant in pro- — progress along the way to lower families’ energy costs; create good-paying union job; and ultimately leave for our children and grandchildren a stronger, healthier planet.

    Ali and John will share a bit more about the president’s domestic and international climate legacy in just a moment, but I want to take a moment to highlight how important the stakes are and why the president’s efforts have been essential in making sure we stay on track for our climate goals.

    If, as the science demands, we are going to meet the president’s goal of achieving net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by no later than 2050 and of limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius, then we’ve got to keep the pedal to the metal on our climate efforts.  We cannot afford to delay or to go back. 

    We’re seeing the impacts the climate crisis is having on our communities every day.  Yet as cities are flooding or on fire or under extreme heat watches or trapped in a cloud of smog, many congressional Republicans continue to deny the very existence of climate change.

    And it’s not just talk.  Congressional Republicans are taking action right now that would roll back investments in climate, clean energy, and public health.

    In this session alone, congressional Republicans’ efforts to gut climate protections are being pushed through a variety of avenues, including appropriations bills, Congressional Review Act resolutions, and other legislative actions, which would have a devastating impact on families, the economy, and the environment. 

    From undermining clean vehicle tax credits to attacking cost-saving efficiency standards, they continue to side with special interests to keep consumer energy prices high.

    During this session, congressional Republicans have advanced legislation to repeal new programs from President Biden’s Investing in America agenda that are helping families save hundreds of dollars each year on energy costs, including attacking new rebate programs for energy-efficient home upgrades and programs that support residential solar projects in low-income communities.

    After the president’s historic work to enhance public health protections and strengthen pollution standards, congressional Republicans are working to weaken those protections, which would harm their constituents’ lives and livelihoods.

    They’ve introduced resolutions that would roll back the administration’s rules that protect communities from coal plants’ water pollution, air pollution, and waste disposal.  They’re working to overturn lifesaving rules under the Clean Air Act that reduce pollution from power plants, cars, trucks, and indus- — and industrial sources.  And they’re failing to protect the health of mine workers, including by trying to block new rules that protect coal and other miners from toxic exposures.

    With more than 42 million acres already conserved, President Biden is on track to conserve more lands and waters than any modern president has in four years.  But congressional Republicans are attempting to roll back protections for our nation’s outdoor treasures and open up our lands and waters to increased irresponsible development.

    They’re trying to eliminate presidential authority to establish national monuments altogether.  They’re also trying to dismantle President Biden’s America the Beautiful initiative, which is supporting locally led conservation efforts across the country, and to overturn the administration’s Public Lands Rule that will help conserve wildlife habitat, restore places impacted by wildfire and drought, expand outdoor recreation, and guide thoughtful and balanced development.

    They’re supporting legislation and other appropriations vehicles that would undo protections for 13 million acres of special areas in the Western Arctic and dismantle efforts to protect the U.S. Arctic Ocean and Arctic National Wildlife Refuge from new oil and gas leasing.

    The Biden-Harris administration successfully finalized the first updates in decades to hold oil and gas companies accountable and ensure they provide fair returns to taxpayers, but congressional Republicans are seeking to overturn these overdue reforms.

    And just to put a finer point on it: Since President Biden signed the Inflation Reduction Act, congressional Republicans have voted more than 50 times to repeal all or parts of the largest and most impactful climate legislation in history.

    Yet even though most Republicans are in lock- — lockstep in this approach, some are starting to change their tune.  Last month, 18 House Republicans sent a letter to Speaker Johnson asking him not to repeal the Inflation Reduction Act.

    Perhaps it’s because President’s Biden’s policies are leading to more than 330,000 new clean energy jobs already created, more than half of which are in Republican-held districts.

    It also might be because they’re starting to realize that jacking up families’ energy prices, weakening pollution protections, and slowing our clean energy transition are unpopular back home.

    Whatever the reason, it’s obvious that the contrast between President Biden and Kamala Harris’ policies with those of congressional Republicans couldn’t be clearer.

    This coming Climate Week and for every week thereafter, this president and his team will continue to work on behalf of the American people to protect our planet, lower energy costs, create good-paying jobs, and do what’s needed to ensure that our grandchildren can experience a planet with clean air and drinkable water.

    And with that, I’ll turn it over to the president’s national climate adviser, Ali Zaidi.

    MR. ZAIDI:  Thanks so much to everybody for joining.

    We are five years into what the UNFCCC declared as the “decisive decade for climate action.”  Tomorrow, President Biden will deliver the decisive decade halftime report.  And what he will show is how the United States has changed the playbook fundamentally — not focused on the doom and gloom, focused instead on the massive economic opportunity, a chance to build U.S. manufacturing and infrastructure, and a chance to build the American middle class.

    The president will talk about what we’re seeing on the scoreboard.  Since the start of the administration, 100 gigawatts of clean energy built in the United States — 25 million homes’ worth of power.  You see off our coast an offshore industry, where before there was none. 

    In rural America, the largest investment in clean energy electrification since FDR — one in five rural Americans seeing the benefits of that clean energy. 

    A nuclear industry revitalized — plants that were slated to be shut down put back into use; plants retired coming back to meet surging demand.

    In transportation, electric vehicles now quadrupled in sales, chargers doubled on our roads and highways, the postal service going fully electric, and all of that being made in America — batteries being made in America; anodes, cathodes, the very critical minerals necessary for tackling climate change being sourced here in the United States of America.

    And, of course, we’re seeing this translate into benefits for consumers.  The standards the president has finalized or more efficient appliances saving a trillion dollars for consumers over the next several decades.

    And just last year, millions of Americans taking advantage of the Biden-Harris clean energy tax credits to retrofit their homes, put in upgrades that will save them money, lower utility bills and costs. 

    He’s done all of this while protecting the environment.  As Ben noted, 42 million acres conserved by tackling the scrooge [scourge] of environmental injustice, meeting pollution where it is in fence-line communities, and delivering solutions that take effect right away.

    He’s made sure that we are leaning into the manufacturing opportunity in all of this.  He’s going to talk about how we invented a lot of these technologies, but over the last several years, we’ve now started to actually make these technologies — $900 billion in manufacturing.

    So, you see because of these historic efforts under President Biden, Vice President Harris, capital coming off the sidelines, jobs coming back, and America leading on climate.  And, you know, core to that — core to that is the president delivering on his fundamental conviction.

    When he was running for office, the president often said, “When I see climate, I see jobs.”  Since the beginning of his administration, he’s made that a focal point in climate.  It’s what’s helped us put all these points on the board.  Even today, governors will come together to announce a goal to train another million folks into registered apprenticeships that deliver on the climate workforce that we need to build this clean energy future.

    Tomorrow is an opportunity to deliver that decisive decade halftime report to show the progress we’ve made, the points we put on the board, and the path ahead.  And President Biden will do that eloquently and in a way, I think, that will hopefully activate and animate accelerated action not just here but around the world.

    And for that, let me hand it over to my partner in all of this, the president’s international climate adviser, John Podesta.

    MR. PODESTA:  Thanks, Ali.  And — and thanks to everyone for joining at the beginning of this action-packed Climate Week.  And if you’re actually in New York, the traffic-packed Climate Week.

    Over the past four years, President Biden and Vice President Harris have pursued the most ambitious and successful climate agenda in history, both domestically and internationally.

    We know that the climate crisis is a global problem and that no one country alone can solve it but that U.S. leadership on this issue is critical for bringing the world together.

    That’s why President Biden rejoined the Paris Agreement on day — day one.  It’s why he set a bold goal to cut U.S. emissions by 50 to 52 percent below 2005 levels by 2030 and backed that goal up with action through the Inflation Reduction Act, the largest investment in climate and clean energy in the world, as Ali just went through.  And it’s why he convened three leaders summits on climate, ratified the Kigali Amendment to the Mo- — Montreal Protocol to phase down super-polluting hydrofluorocarbons.

    Over the past four years, this resurgence of U.S. leadership on global climate action has yielded real results.

    We’ve raised ambition from countries and companies around the world through the Global Methane Pledge to reduce global methane emissions 30 percent by 2030, with now 158 countries and the EU signing on.

    At COP28 in Dubai in December 2023, the United States successfully galvanized the world to commit, for the first time, to transition away from unabated fossil fuels; to stop building new unabated coal capacity globally; to triple renewable energy globally by 2030, to double the level of efficiency by 2030, and to triple nuclear energy by 2050.

    We’ve remained focused on climate finance, which is the biggest topic of discussion at this year’s COP29 in Azerbaijan.

    President Biden pledged to work with Congress to quadruple U.S. international public climate finance to over $11 billion per year by 2024.  And we’re on track to deliver on that commitment.  That includes over $3 billion per year for adaptation under the president’s Emergency Plan for Adaptation and Resilience, or the so-called PREPARE program, which will help a half a billion people worldwide adapt to and manage climate impacts, including sea level rise, storms, droughts, and food insecurity. 

    The next few months are crucial for our international climate agenda — from COP16 on biodiversity in Cali to the G20 in Rio to COP29 in Baku, and, of course, this week in New York.

    This week and throughout this fall, we’ll continue to work with our allies and partners around the world to raise ambitions; unlock additional climate finance from the private sector, multilateral development banks, and public sources; accelerate the deployment of clean energy by driving innovation and lowering costs; reversing and finally ending deforestation; and help more vulnerable countries and communities adapt to a changing climate.

    Here’s the bottom line: Thanks to President Biden and Vice President Harris, we’re on the right path here in the U.S. and around the world.  We have to accelerate our progress toward our collective climate goals, and I think the president will be calling on other leaders of the world, as he did over the weekend in the new announcements on clean cooling and the clean energy industrial fellowship we entered into with India, to get that job done.

    Thank you.  And I’ll turn it back over to Angelo.

    MR. FERNÁNDEZ HERNÁNDEZ:  Thanks, John.  And we will move to the question-and-answer portion.  Please use the “raise hand” function on Zoom, and we will call on you.  As you are called on, please identify yourself and your outlet.

    Okay, we will begin with Lisa.  You should be unmuted now.

    Q    Hi, everyone.  Thank you so much for doing this this morning.

    John, you mentioned that the president will be calling on — on other leaders.  You know, this is a very international audience this week.  Already, countries have seen the United States leave and join and leave and join global efforts to fight climate change.  What will the president’s message be to world leaders who are worried about what a Trump administration would bring on climate and maybe don’t know whether the U.S. can be trusted to be a long-term partner?

    I guess, related, do you expect President Biden to — to speak directly about former President Trump?

    MR. PODESTA:  Lisa, you know, in my current role, I can’t talk about politics.  (Laughs.)  But I think it’s clear that the track record from the previous administration vers- — which pulled out of Paris, abandoned the — the partnership that we had around the globe, reversed a number of actions that President Obama had taken on climate change versus the record that we just laid out is clearly of concern and interest to people around the world.

    All I can tell you is the president has demonstrated that you can produce strong economic growth, create good-paying jobs, reach all areas of the country in this — in this task of decarbonizing our economy. 

    And that’s the message I think he’s sending to global re- — leaders: This is doable.  We can invest in the — these new technologies.  We can put people to work doing the work that needs to be done, and it’s going to be good for your publics.

    So, I think that in — in his speech to — to UNGA, he will, I think, reflect on that record, and I’m sure the — the alternatives will be implicit.

    MR. ZAIDI:  Look, what I’d add to that — this is Ali — is you’ve seen the politics of climate inaction deteriorate in Congress.  House Republicans have put up nearly 50 votes to roll back President Biden and Vice President Harris’ historic climate efforts.  They failed.  They failed even within their own caucus: Now a dozen and a half members calling on their own leadership to wrap up these efforts, to go in a U-turn direction, because they see the economic case for climate action.

    Part of the reason the president has been successful — and as he speaks to this tomorrow, he will point out — is this new formula on climate action, which is focused on driving investment in U.S. manufacturing and U.S. infrastructure, and that has resulted in unprecedented and successful job creation all across the country in blue districts and in red.

    So, the politics of inaction are deteriorating.  The case for a U-turn is weak and fragile and falling apart.  But the haste to go bold and accelerate climate action, we’re seeing the results from that; that’s strengthening.

    And, you know, Lisa, you mentioned, there are a lot of leaders from around the world here in New York.  There are also a lot of leaders from industry and big investors here in New York, and they’re paying attention to one thing and one thing only, and that is: In the United States, the case for investing in clean energy has never been stronger.  The economics for climate action are irresistible here in the United States.  And that’s going to cascade around the world as we accelerate progress in this decisive decade.

    MR. FERNÁNDEZ HERNÁNDEZ:  Thanks, Ali.  We will go to Kemi next.  You should be unmuted now.

    Q    Hello.  Can you guys hear me?  Hello?

    MR. FERNÁNDEZ HERNÁNDEZ:  Yes.

    Q    Okay.  Thank you.  Sorry.  En route to New York. 

    I wanted to ask if you can talk about the multilateral (inaudible) boosting climate financing for developing countries as well as how the U.S., the administration will work with China, the number one polluters in the world.  As — and your initiative also working with African nations. 

    Thank you.

    MR. PODESTA:  Well, thanks — thanks for the question.  I — at the bilateral level, I laid out a — at the front end of my remarks, the president’s commitment to increasing climate finance across the board and reach communities across the globe. 

    We’ve succeeded in — in meeting the targets that the president did at — in his UNGA speech in 2021.  I want to underscore that.  That’s where he said we will quadruple our climate finance from the historically high level that President Obama produced.  It was actually substantially more than that if you compare it to the last years under President Trump.  And we’re on track to do that.

    Where I’m engaged in events here to try to track additional private-sector investment into the adaptation space, noting — I noted the PREPARE program that the president has put forward, which is going to provide a — help and service to half a billion people across the globe. 

    We’re engaged, I think, with the — the i- — the discussion right now to increase the national cumulative qualified goal that’s, as I noted, part of what’s most important on the agenda in Baku.  Those conversations are continuing, but we’ve seen a substantial increase in climate finance coming through the multilateral development banks and other sources. 

    It’s going to take the effort of all of us to go from the billions of dollars of — hundreds of billions of dollars of public support that we’ve seen to, really, the trillion dollars of need that are necessary to build sustainable energy systems across the globe. 

    And so, I think, again, in his conversations with — with global leaders, he hosted President Ruto of Kenya earlier this year, created a commitment to a bilateral partnership with the government of Kenya to build out supply chains there.  We’re working with India and Tanzania to do the same thing across new supply chains in Africa. 

    So, I think the president is r- — is quite focused on this and will get a chance to speak to it both in the meetings that he’s holding on the side as well as in his main UNGA speech.

    Q    Okay.  If I can just quickly follow up on that.  A lot of these developing countries are looking into carbon market.  What is your response?  What is your view regarding that? 

    MR. PODESTA:  You know, earlier this summer, we issued a joint statement from the U.S. government on our views on the fact that those high-integrity carbon markets are a potentially strong source of finance for countries both to decarbonize the power sector.  Secretary Kerry did a tremendous work on creating a new instrument, if you will, in that space as well as in — in agriculture and forestry. 

    But as we noted in that statement, there’s — there needs to be high integrity both on behalf of the sellers of carbon credits as well as on behalf of buyers in order to make these — these markets work and — and see those — that ability for carbon finance to flow through that channel.  Without that, I think the market and — and I think we saw this in the last couple of years — it begins to lose faith that those — that the emissions reductions are real.  In which case, I think people back off from making the commitments. 

    So, I think it’s really critical to make sure that these markets are — have strong integrity, and we laid out the principles to make that happen. 

    MR. ZAIDI:  I just want to add a little bit on how domestic action is, I think, enabling more ambition around the world.

    First, there has been analysis, including from the Boston Consulting Group, on the impacts of the Inflation Reduction Act in terms of technology cost reduction that actually improve the odds of scale-up around the world — everything from battery technology to clean hydrogen production through electrolyzers. 

    That technology is being de-risked as a result of the generational investment that President Biden has marshaled to take on the climate crisis here in the United States. 

    That’s going to have very significant implications around the world.  One modeling projection done by the Rhodium Group shows that for every ton reduced here, we will see two or three reduced around the world, again, as the result of that technology de-risking. 

    The second is the platform de-risking.  John talked about the voluntary carbon markets and the principles we laid out earlier this summer to help high-integrity scale-up of that platform. 

    The investment the United States is making, for example, through the Department of Agriculture in measurement, monitoring, and verification regimes, or through the EPA and the Department of Energy in the utilization of satellite data to track methane leaks from industrial sources — those investments in satellite, in harnessing machine learning and artificial intelligence to take on climate change — those platform investments will de-risk those platforms for the rest of the world and I think help bring additional resources to the Global South. 

    And then there’s the role of the capital markets more broadly.  In the United States, we are building muscle memory around new asset classes, and that’s going to accrue benefits to capital formation and project development all around the world. 

    So, look, there is the — there is the effort, I think, underway by G20 countries.  The*28:59 — when the president was out at the last G20, he said, “I passed an Inflation Reduction Act.  You should copycat that.”  So, there are a lot of countries that are downloading the U.S. playlist on how to jam out on climate. 

    But there’s a second piece of it, which is the actions we’re taking here in the United States are de-risking technologies, they’re de-risking platforms, and they’re building the muscle memory to accelerate capital formation project development around the world. 

    Obviously, that all complements the very important development finance and multilateral work — work John talked about, but I do think this work domestically is going to echo around the world.

    MR. FERNÁNDEZ HERNÁNDEZ:  Thanks, Ali. 

    And our final question will come from Robin.  You should be unmuted now.

    Q    Hi.  Can you hear me?

    MR. FERNÁNDEZ HERNÁNDEZ:  Yes. 

    Q    Thanks so much for taking my call.  I wondered if you could tell us — I know the president told his Cabinet to “sprint to the finish.”  I wonder if you can tell us what that’s going to mean on climate, if there’s anything else we can expect — big announcements on climate before the end of the term, and also how he’s thinking about climate when he’s approaching his legacy?

    MR. ZAIDI:  Robin, I think the president is thinking about climate the same way he has been from day one.  When he thinks climate, he thinks jobs.  And I know that sounds simple, but I think that’s been the driver of the political economy and the investment case around the country, and that continues to be the case. 

    You know, you’ll — you’ll see from the administration what you’ve seen from day one: a concerted focus on a sector-by-sector basis, each part of the economy.

    In terms of developing new standards and rules that provide certainty to business and improve the investment climate around clean energy technologies, you will continue to see robust implementation from our agencies on the infrastructure law and the Inflation Reduction Act.  On the broader investment agenda, making sure that those investments are turning in to impacts on the ground.

    And you’ll see us do the important work of blocking and tackling to make sure our projects are getting built.  Permitting, citing execution has been a focal point for the Biden-Harris administration from day one. 

    You know, this Cabinet meeting, the president talked about sprinting through the finish line, making sure that we’re building an irreversible momentum behind climate action.  But I remember the last Cabinet meeting when he reminded the Cabinet that these laws, these standards, these investments were only as good as the impact they were making on the ground.  So, he continues to be relentlessly focused on implementation, on execution, on getting things built. 

    And that goes to the point I made at the top.  This is no longer a theoretical playbook.  You could see it as points on the scoreboard today: A hundred gigawatts of clean energy built in the United States under the Biden-Harris administration.  That’s going to be our focus.  That’s where we continue to spend our time.

    MR. FERNÁNDEZ HERNÁNDEZ:  Thanks, Ali. 

    And that is all the time we have today.  Thank you, again, to our speakers and to all of you for joining.

    As a reminder, this call and the materials you all received over email or will receive over email will be embargoed until 1:00 P.M. Eastern today.

    Thanks again for joining us. 

    10:20 A.M. EDT

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: ICYMI: Cassidy “It’s Time to Hold China Accountable on Pollution”

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Louisiana Bill Cassidy
    WASHINGTON – U.S. Senator Bill Cassidy, M.D. (R-LA) penned an op-ed in The Washington Times for their special Energy Week edition highlighting an industrial manufacturing and trade policy to counter competition from China. The piece highlights Cassidy’s Foreign Pollution Fee Act, legislation to level the playing field with Chinese manufacturing and expand American production.
    “For years, China has strengthened its economy, military, and geopolitical influence at the expense of the U.S. This must stop. It is time to hold communist China accountable with comprehensive legislation that addresses economic development, national security, and the environment. The Foreign Pollution Fee Act (FPFA) is the path forward,” wrote Dr. Cassidy. 
    “It makes absolutely no sense to continue allowing China and other countries to pollute freely and weaken the U.S. economically, and relatively speaking, militarily. We must turn the tables to make China pay instead of making the American people pay. The FPFA does this,” concluded Dr. Cassidy. 
    Read the full op-ed here or below: 
    It’s Time to Hold China Accountable on Pollution
    For years, China has strengthened its economy, military, and geopolitical influence at the expense of the U.S. This must stop. It is time to hold communist China accountable with comprehensive legislation that addresses economic development, national security, and the environment. The Foreign Pollution Fee Act (FPFA) is the path forward.
    Over the years, China has gained an unfair trade advantage over American companies by intentionally not enforcing environmental standards. A business deciding between opening a manufacturing plant in the U.S. or China has a clear monetary incentive to pick China. This has contributed to 2.5 million American jobs being lost to China over the last 20 years.
    This is negatively affecting our environment. Up to a quarter of sulfate pollution in the western U.S. comes from Chinese emissions, according to a study published by the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. China’s greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions now exceed those of the U.S. and EU combined.
    As this took place, China’s GDP grew from 19th globally to second. China has used its economic strength to become the second-greatest military power in the world. China uses military power as a hegemonic tool, seeking to intimidate Japan, Taiwan, the Philippines, and other U.S. allies.
    China gets American jobs, expands economically, and uses economic strength to militarize, while America gets China’s pollution. At the same time, the U.S. spends billions to make sure our manufacturing and energy production is the cleanest in the world. This is wrong.
    Classical economics says that there is a place for fees or tariffs if there is an externality, like pollution, not included in the price of a good. This is the basis for the FPFA. This fee capitalizes on the fact that the U.S. has invested billions to control emissions. The FPFA would be commensurate with the avoided cost of complying with international pollution control norms. This decreases the ability of China (and other high-polluting countries) to underprice U.S. manufacturers. The FPFA will incentivize high-polluting countries to reduce emissions. To the degree that it equalizes manufacturing costs, it can encourage re-shoring jobs. Speaking of China in particular, in concert with the economic advantage shifting to the U.S., China will have less money to militarize. For the U.S., it’s a win, win, win, instead of a lose, lose, lose.
    I recently presented my plan to Americans from across the country visiting D.C. in the latest episode of Bill on the Hill. People agreed that putting a fee on dirty products coming from high-polluting countries was not only wise policy but the reasonable course of action. This is consistent with recent nationwide polling that found that 84% of Americans favor taxing foreign companies for importing products that emit more GHG than comparable U.S. products.
    It makes absolutely no sense to continue allowing China and other countries to pollute freely and weaken the U.S. economically, and relatively speaking, militarily. We must turn the tables to make China pay instead of making the American people pay. The FPFA does this.
    • Sen. Bill Cassidy was elected to the U.S. Senate in 2014. He serves on the Finance Committee, the Health, Education, Labor, & Pensions Committee (HELP), the Energy and Natural Resources Committee, and the Veterans Affairs Committee.
    Background
    Cassidy announced he will be holding a summit entitled, “Louisiana Energy Security Summit: Unleashing American Abundance in a Changing Global Landscape,” in Baton Rouge on Wednesday, October 16, 2024. The Energy Security Summit will bring together leaders from the federal, state, and local government, industry, research community, and more. 
    He frequently highlights the geopolitical challenges confronting U.S. manufacturers operating internationally. Adversaries exploit lax environmental and labor standards to gain an unfair trade advantage over American companies. Cassidy advocates for a U.S. foreign policy integrating national, economic, and energy security.
    He and U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC) introduced their Foreign Pollution Fee Act to level the playing field with Chinese manufacturing and expand American production.
    Earlier this month, he released the 3rd episode of Bill on the Hill, which highlights his Foreign Pollution Fee Act and discusses China’s growing economy and military at the expense of the American worker. After hearing fellow Americans share his concerns, Cassidy presented his plan to address the nexus between economic development, national security, and the environment. His Foreign Pollution Fee Act would even the playing field while holding China accountable.
    He penned editorials in Foreign Affairs, The Washington Times, and jointly in the USA Today Network with State Senator Caleb Kleinpeter (R-Port Allen), and State Representative Blake Miguez (R-Erath) discussing the geopolitical threats China poses to U.S. global standing. Cassidy also joined Greta Van Susteren on Newsmax to discuss his foreign pollution fee, noting the competitive advantage China receives from intentionally ignoring environmental standards. 
    Last Spring, the Louisiana Senate and House of Representatives unanimously adopted a resolution urging Congress to pursue an industrial manufacturing and trade policy to counter competition from China. Learn more here. 
    Last Congress, Cassidy released a landmark energy policy outline in response to the Biden administration’s assault on domestic energy. The outline details how we can successfully reset U.S. energy policy, including Cassidy’s plan for an Energy Operation Warp Speed to cut permitting red tape and unleash domestic energy and manufacturing. In support of this complete vision and in addition to the Foreign Pollution Fee, Cassidy led Republican colleagues in opposition to a domestic carbon tax and introduced the first comprehensive judicial reform for permitting bill. He also pushed back on disastrous proposals from the Biden administration to limit development in the Outer Continental Shelf with the introduction of the WHALE Act and the Offshore Energy Security Act of 2023.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI China: Cai Guo-Qiang’s big bang of art, science and AI

    Source: China State Council Information Office 3

    When art meets science, the result can be explosive and revolutionary.

    This fusion lies at the heart of Cai Guo-Qiang: A Material Odyssey, an exhibition currently on at the University of Southern California Pacific Asia Museum, which runs until next June.

    The exhibition goes beyond the traditional gallery format, merging art with chemistry, physics and artificial intelligence to display the pioneering work of contemporary artist Cai Guo-Qiang, who uses gunpowder in his creations.

    “Cai’s work is a masterful demonstration of how art and science can converge to create something entirely new,” Bethany Montagano, director of USC Museums, told reporters at a preview event on Sept 13.

    “We are excited to host this transformative exhibition, which not only celebrates Cai’s innovative use of gunpowder, but also highlights the important research and collaboration happening at the intersection of art, science and AI,” she says.

    A Material Odyssey features a series of gunpowder test pieces produced for the Getty Research Institute to study.

    The 67-year-old was born in Quanzhou, Fujian province, and trained in stage design at the Shanghai Theatre Academy in the early 1980s. From December 1986 to September 1995, he worked in Japan and has lived and worked in New York since then.

    Best known for his use of gunpowder in intricate paintings, drawings and large-scale pyrotechnic performances, Cai has spent decades pushing the boundaries of art by incorporating volatile materials into his creative process.

    These materials have been central to his philosophy and creative practice, symbolizing both destruction and creation.

    “I am often inspired by the calmness and the natural strength manifested in the work after the vibrant colors fade. Changes in the gunpowder bring about uncontrollability and unpredictability, which is what makes working with gunpowder so fascinating. The change itself is part of my work,” Cai says.

    According to Rachel Rivenc, lead curator and head of Conservation and Preservation at the Getty Research Institute, A Material Odyssey highlights something rarely seen in exhibitions: science as a tool for understanding artistic techniques, and presents imagery that explores the molecular behavior of gunpowder, and its evolution as an artistic medium in the artist’s hands.

    “Cai has embraced the use of gunpowder because he wanted to relinquish control over the creative process. No matter how precisely a gunpowder drawing is planned, the results are still unpredictable,” Rivenc says.

    “The awe-inspiring nature of Cai Guo-Qiang’s work embodies many of the values we hold dear at our museum,” says Rebecca Hall, USC PAM curator. “His gunpowder drawings and paintings, when presented alongside the museum’s permanent collection and housed in this historic building, remind us that as we push the boundaries of art and science, we remain deeply connected to the wisdom and creativity of the past.”

    The event serves as a companion to the artist’s latest project, WE ARE: Explosion Event for PST ART, which lit up the skies above the Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum on Sept 15. Integrating AI-driven choreography with fireworks, drones and data science, the free daytime performance commissioned by Getty launched PST ART’s new theme, Art & Science Collide, in a spectacular fashion.

    “Today, with the rapid rise of technologies like AI, culture and the arts often seem powerless. I hope WE ARE will serve as a monumental gesture of how the art world can merge the virtual and real in this new AI-driven era, while also standing as a strong voice and decisive action in these turbulent times,” says Cai, who has been researching AI since 2017.

    The event was one of the first large-scale daytime fireworks display in the US to incorporate drone formations equipped with pyrotechnic devices, according to Katherine Fleming, president and CEO of the J Paul Getty Trust.

    MIL OSI China News

  • MIL-OSI China: Summit of the Future reaches consensus on UN updates to address challenges

    Source: China State Council Information Office 3

    Philemon Yang, president of the General Assembly of the United Nations, speaks at the Summit of the Future at the UN headquarters in New York, Sept. 22, 2024. [Photo/Xinhua]

    The Summit of the Future opened at the United Nations (UN) headquarters in New York on Sunday, with the adoption of a Pact for the Future, as well as its annexes the Global Digital Compact and the Declaration on Future Generations, which cover a broad range of themes including peace and security, sustainable development, climate change, digital cooperation, human rights, gender, youth and future generations and the transformation of global governance.

    The Pact for the Future is the UN’s master plan for tackling challenges that lie ahead for humanity, with 56 “actions” covering everything from peacekeeping to the potential threats posed by artificial intelligence. The pact underlines the “increasingly complex challenges” to world peace, notably the threat of nuclear war, with the document reiterating the UN’s core tenets.

    The pact promises to accelerate efforts to attain the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), which aim for the eradication of extreme poverty by 2030, an intensified battle against hunger, promotion of gender equality and education. Most of the objectives were set in 2005, but are far from being realized. Against that backdrop, and with poor countries particularly mobilized for change, the pact especially calls for “reform of the international financial architecture.”

    What UNGA president says?

    “We stand at a crossroads of global transformation, facing unprecedented challenges that demand urgent, collective action,” Philemon Yang, president the UN General Assembly, said at the opening segment of the two-day summit. “From conflict and climate change to the digital divide, from inequalities to threats against human rights, together, we all face profound challenges. Yet, alongside these challenges, there is hope,” because challenges come along with opportunities.

    The Pact for the Future represents the world body’s pledge not only to address immediate crises, but lay the foundations for a sustainable, just, and peaceful global order, for all peoples and nations, he said, adding that the commitments embodied in the pact and its annexes reflect the collective will of UN member states to promote international peace and security, invigorate implementation of the SDGs, foster just and inclusive societies, and ensure that technologies always serve the common good of humankind.

    “The Summit of the Future is a call to action. We must shape our future to protect ourselves and our planet Earth,” said the president. “Action that recommits us to the principles of international law, the goals of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and the promise of the United Nations Charter to save future generations from the pain of war.”

    The world body’s mission is to eradicate poverty in all its forms, tackle inequalities, and promote peace and security, tolerance and respect for diversity, and the summit offers a historic opportunity to ensure that progress is shared equitably across all nations and communities everywhere, he said.

    “We have an obligation to harness the power of science, technology, and innovation, in order to prepare the future of humankind. It is also important that we reproduce our human successes across generations all the time,” noted the president. “Let us continue our efforts to reform and strengthen global institutions that support peace, security, sustainable development, and financial stability.”

    What UN secretary general says?

    “I called for this summit to consider deep reforms to make global institutions more legitimate, fair and effective, based on the values of the UN Charter,” said UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres at the meeting. “I called for this summit because 21st century challenges require 21st century solutions: frameworks that are networked and inclusive; and that draw on the expertise of all of humanity … our world is heading off the rails — and we need tough decisions to get back on track.”

    Conflicts are raging and multiplying, from the Middle East to Ukraine and Sudan, with no end in sight, he said, adding that the world’s collective security system is threatened by geopolitical divides, nuclear posturing, and the development of new weapons and theaters of war, while resources that could bring opportunities and hope are invested in death and destruction.

    “In short, our multilateral tools and institutions are unable to respond effectively to today’s political, economic, environmental and technological challenges. And tomorrow’s will be even more difficult and even more dangerous,” noted the secretary general, stressing that things are changing fast but the world’s peace and security tools and institutions, as well as its global financial architecture, reflect a bygone era.

    Technology, geopolitics and globalization have transformed power relations and the world is going through a time of turbulence and a period of transition, he addressed the meeting. With the adoption of the Pact for the Future, the Global Digital Compact and the Declaration on Future Generations, pathways are opened to new possibilities and opportunities — a breakthrough on peace and security reforms to make the Security Council more reflective of today’s world is promised.

    These three landmark agreements are a step-change toward more effective, inclusive, networked multilateralism, said Guterres, noting that their implementation will prioritize dialogue and negotiation, end the wars tearing the world apart, and reform the composition and working methods of the Security Council. “To rebuild trust, we must start with the present and look to the future. People everywhere are hoping for a future of peace, dignity, and prosperity.”

    What Summit of the Future Means?

    In 2020, the United Nations turned 75 and marked the occasion by starting a global conversation about hopes and fears for the future. This was the beginning of a process that would eventually lead, four years later, to the convening of the Summit of the Future, a major event this September, just before the annual high-level debate of the General Assembly.

    The summit was conceived at the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, when there was a perception at the UN that countries and people pulled apart instead of cooperating to face this global threat.

    “We were really confronted with the gap between the aspirations of our founders, which we were trying to celebrate at the 75th anniversary, and the reality of the world as it is today,” said Michele Griffin, the policy director of the summit.

    UN member states tasked Guterres to come up with a vision for the future of global cooperation. His answer to their call was “Our Common Agenda,” a landmark report with recommendations on renewed global cooperation to address a host of risks and threats, and a proposal to hold a forward-looking summit in 2024.

    The event consists of sessions and plenaries based around five main tracks — sustainable development and financing; peace and security; a digital future for all; youth and future generations; and global governance — and other topics that cut across all of the work of the UN, including human rights, gender equality and the climate crisis.

    The immediate outcome is the finalized version of the Pact for the Future, with the Global Digital Compact and the Declaration for Future Generations as annexes, all of which were adopted by member states during the summit on Sunday.

    MIL OSI China News