Category: Commerce

  • MIL-OSI USA: King: Congress’s Inability to Pass Spending Bills Harms National Security

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Maine Angus King
    WASHINGTON, D.C. — In a hearing before the Senate Armed Services Committee (SASC), U.S. Senator Angus King questioned three witnesses about the adverse impact of the Republican-led House and Senate not passing annual federal spending bills on military capability and production. During the hearing, Senator King spoke with David Berteau, the President and Chief Executive Office of the Professional Services Council; Dr. Christine Michienzi, the former Senior Technology Advisor to the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment; and Dr. John McGinn, the Executive Director of the Greg and Camille Baroni Center for Government Contracting at George Mason University’s Costello College of Business.
    The exchange comes as Congress has struggled to negotiate a federal spending law that would pass with bipartisan support and be approved by the White House. Now, with less than 10 days to avert a government shutdown, Congressional appropriators are pursuing a continuing resolution that would temporarily fund the government at the previous year’s levels — therefore not adding new policies or investments that the military needs.
    “Could we all agree that continuing resolutions absolutely are not part of the solution to this problem,” asked Senator King.
    “Franklin Roosevelt did not face a single continuing resolution in the entire buildup to World War II and the entire execution thereof,” replied Berteau.
    “I concur,” said Dr. McGinn.
    “I concur,” echoed Dr. Michienzi.
    “All of you agree with that. That is one of the difficulties we are in now. It creates all kinds of downstream in the industrial base and preparation. Thank you for that. Let the record show, continuing resolutions are not the way to do business, particularly in the defense area,” said Senator King. “All of you have mentioned something very interesting which is allies are part of the solution. It concerns me that we are embarked on a course that is not encouraging to our allies, and in some cases poking our allies in the eye. Talk to me about the importance of allies in dealing with the production necessary for significant conflict whether it is Japan, U.K., Canada, or other countries.”
    “Our allies are a key part of our industrial base. We have a number of agreements and collaborative programs. The largest fighter program in the world, the F-35, we have a dozen partner countries I believe,” responded Dr. McGinn. 
    “We cannot do this by ourselves, correct,” asked Senator King. “All of you are nodding, could you say yes? They don’t show up in the transcript.” 
    “Yes,” Berteau, Dr. Michienzi and Dr. McGinn agreed unanimously.
    A member of the Senate Armed Services Committee and the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, Senator King is recognized as an authoritative voice on national security and foreign policy issues who has also been named a “fiscal hero” by government watchdogs for responsible spending. Senator King has previously urged the Department of Defense (DoD) to take advantage of private sector technologies or risk losing access to innovative defense technologies and encouraged the (DoD) to reevaluate its acquisition process of defense technologies.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: 2025 Feed-in Tariffs (FIT) Rates for Renewable Energy Officially Announced

    Source: Republic Of China Taiwan 2

    The Ministry of Economic Affairs (MOEA) has finalized the “R.O.C. 2025 Renewable Energy Feed-in Tariffs (FIT) and Calculation Formulas”, confirming that the official rates remain unchanged from the initial draft, and continues to offer incentives for diverse renewable installations through tariff levels and various subsidies and supporting mechanisms to encourage further expansions. Compared to 2024, the FIT rate for rooftop solar PV installations ranging from 1kW to under 10kW remains the same as the second phase of 2024, while other categories have undergone slight reductions. Furthermore, a new capacity range of 1-100kW has been added for small hydropower to reflect cost differences based on scale. Meanwhile, all existing incentives and supporting mechanisms remain unchanged.

    The key points of the officially announced 2025 Feed-in Tariffs (FIT) Rates for Renewable Energy (see details in the attachment) are as follows (same as draft):
    1. Solar PV: Two-phase rates are adopted. The FIT rate for the first phase (first half of the year) ranges from NT$ 3.5337 to NT$ 5.7055 per kWh, while the second phase (second half of the year) ranges from NT$ 3.5037 to NT$ 5.6279 per kWh.

    2. Wind Power: Rates remain unchanged. The FIT rate for onshore wind farms with capacities under 30kW is NT$ 7.4110 per kWh, while onshore wind farms with capacities of 30kW and above are at NT$ 2.1286 per kWh. Offshore wind power maintains a FIT rate of NT$ 4.5085 per kWh.

    3. Biomass Energy: Rates remain unchanged. The FIT rate for biogas (with anaerobic digestion facilities) is NT$ 7.0192 per kWh. The rate for the solid biofuels and domestic agricultural residues resources is NT$ 5.1407 per kWh, and NT$ 2.8066 per kWH for other biomass categories.

    4. Waste to Energy: The FIT rates for energy generated from general and general industrial wastes category remain unchanged at NT$ 3.9482 per kWh.

    5. Small Hydropower: The FIT rates for 1-100kW capacity category is NT$ 4.9548 per kWh. The rates for other capacity ranges (100kW-500kW, 500kW-2MW, and 2MW-20MW) remain unchanged at NT$ 4.8936 per kWh, NT$ 4.2285 per kWh, and NT$ 2.8599 per kWh respectively.

    6. Geothermal Power: The FIT rates remain unchanged. Facilities with capacities under 2MW will have a FIT rate of NT$ 5.9459 per kWh, while those above 2MW will have a FIT rate of NT$ 5.1956 per kWh.

    7. Marine Energy: The FIT rate remains at NT$ 7.3200 per kWh, the same as in 2024.

    During the public consultation period, stakeholders expressed concerns over solar FIT reductions, refined capacity ranges for small hydropower, higher FIT rates, and more detailed categories for marine energy and creating floating offshore wind FIT category. However, after careful review based on the principles of FIT, the committee decided to uphold the original proposal while committing to ongoing evaluations for potential adjustments.

    The MOEA emphasized that the 2025 FIT review process followed a fair, transparent, and rigorous procedure to ensure that the tariffs aligned with Taiwan’s development environment., The government remains committed to continuously evaluating FIT-related policies to build a solid foundation for Taiwan’s renewable energy development.

    Spokesperson for Energy Administration, Ministry of Economic Affairs: Deputy Director-General, Chih-Wei Wu
    Phone: 02-2775-7750
    Mobile: 0922-339-410
    Email: cwwu@moeaea.gov.tw

    Business Contact (Solar PV, Biomass Energy, Waste to Energy, Small Hydropower): Deputy Director, Shih-Wei Liao
    Phone: 02-2775-7620
    Mobile: 0920-091-081
    Email: swliau@moeaea.gov.tw

    Business Contact (Wind Power, Marine Energy): Director, Chung-Hsien Chen
    Phone: 02-2775-7770
    Mobile: 0919-998-339
    Email: ctchen2@moeaea.gov.tw

    Business Contact (Geothermal Power): Director, Hsiu-Fen Tsai
    Phone: 02-2775-7730
    Mobile: 0905-506-258
    Email: hftsai@moeaea.gov.tw

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News

  • MIL-Evening Report: Diversity helps: a new study shows more women on boards can improve how businesses are managed

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Ramona Zharfpeykan, Lecturer, Department of Accounting and Finance, University of Auckland, Waipapa Taumata Rau

    Jacob Lund/Shutterstock

    Despite large multinational companies such as Goldman Sachs, Paramount, Google and others removing their diversity, equity and inclusion policies, the evidence is clear: having a diverse team can help businesses make better, more empathetic decisions.

    At the top level, a growing body of research shows having more women on corporate boards leads to better decision-making, stronger governance and improved environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance.

    Yet, progress remains slow – even in New Zealand. Though we rank highly on the Human Development Index, the country lags behind in leadership gender equality.

    Women make up 50.8% of the population and hold 40.8% of parliamentary leadership roles. But they hold only 28.5% of board seats and 26.4% of executive roles in the New Zealand’s Stock Exchange (NZX) top 50 companies (the NZX50).

    And while businesses are encouraged to disclose gender diversity policies by the NZX, there are no mandatory quotas, leaving progress uneven.

    However, change is happening. Our new research looked at the the percentage of female directors in NZX-listed firms between 2016 and 2022.

    What we found is positive. Using information from financial infrastructure and data provider LSEG’s database on global financial markets, we identified a rise in the number of female directors on corporate boards. We also saw a corresponding improvement in the firms’ ESG performance.

    Despite making up 50.4% of the population, women hold only 28.5% of board seats and 26.4% of executive roles in NZX50 companies.
    T. Schneider/Shutterstock

    Boosting performance

    Between 2016 and 2022, the proportion of female directors in NZX-listed firms increased from 26% to 36%. These same businesses saw an average 33% improvement in their ESG performance.

    Notably, governance – one of the key ESG pillars – improved significantly, with a 31% increase on average. Governance specifically refers to the effectiveness of the firm’s management systems, board structure and capacity to protect shareholder interests.

    While it’s not possible to say outright that having more women on the board directly influenced governance outcomes, we saw a positive relationship between the two. This suggests having more women in leadership strengthens corporate oversight and ethical decision making.

    Gender diversity does not have the same level of importance in all contexts. While social and environmental performance also improved, this study found no significant link between a more gender-diverse board and these higher scores in social and environmental performance.

    Our findings are supported by overseas research suggesting board diversity does not strongly influence sustainability outcomes when it comes to issues and groups already covered by legislation.

    Therefore, New Zealand’s proactive stance on issues such as the environment, poverty and human rights, as well as encouraging private companies to improve sustainability and transparency, may explain why board diversity had no notable impact on social and environmental performance in this study.

    What women bring to the business

    Our findings align with studies completed overseas.

    In the US, one study found women business leaders tended to prioritise transparency, fairness and stakeholder interests. This made them strong advocates for sustainable and inclusive business practices.

    It’s clear that addressing the gender gap in corporate New Zealand isn’t just about fairness. It’s about economic success. Businesses that embrace diversity perform better, attract top talent and enhance their reputations.

    The solution isn’t simply about enforcing quotas, but ensuring more qualified women are placed in leadership roles. Companies need to move beyond a “compliance mindset” and recognise true diversity strengthens governance, reduces risk and drives long-term success.

    As the world celebrates International Women’s Day on March 8, businesses need to realise that increasing female representation at the top isn’t just the right thing to do – it’s the smart thing to do.

    Ramona Zharfpeykan does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. Diversity helps: a new study shows more women on boards can improve how businesses are managed – https://theconversation.com/diversity-helps-a-new-study-shows-more-women-on-boards-can-improve-how-businesses-are-managed-251473

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Charges – Property offences – Greater Darwin Region

    Source: Northern Territory Police and Fire Services

    The Northern Territory Police Force has charged three male youths in relation to a crime series that commenced on Monday in the Greater Darwin Region.

    Strike Force Trident detectives have conducted extensive investigations to identify the perpetrators of multiple thefts and unlawful entries whilst using a stolen motor vehicle.

    About 1:40pm on Monday, police allege a male youth and a female youth attended a shopping centre in Yarrawonga and stole small items from a business.

    The following day at about 3:15pm, the same male youth involved in the incident the day before allegedly returned to the same shopping centre and stole further items from a separate business whilst in the company of other male youths.

    Three male youths then attended a recreational on The Boulevard where they stole car keys to a blue Nissan X-trail from a worker.

    The group of three subsequently met up with the male youth who was involved in both shopping centre thefts, located the vehicle and drove off from the location.

    The group of four males went on to unlawfully enter four separate businesses in Winnellie, Berrimah and Holtze before attempting to unlawfully enter a fifth business.

    About 1am the following morning on Wednesday, the same group allegedly attempted to unlawfully enter a further two businesses within the Bellamack Business Precinct before being disturbed by police in the area.

    The stolen vehicle was recovered at 5am that morning and has been seized for forensic analysis.

    Yesterday morning, Strike Force Trident detectives arrested and charged three male youths, aged 13, 14 and 16 with:

    • Drive/Ride/Use MV without consent
    • 4 x Aggravated Burglary
    • 3 x Attempted Burglary
    • 7 x Damage to Property
    • 3 x Theft
    • Trespass

    The 13 and 14-year-old males received an extra charge of Breach Bail.

    Further charges were laid on the 13-year-old in relation to the incidents, including two extra counts of shoplifting and Drive Unlicenced.

    Investigations remain ongoing with Strike Force Trident working to arrest the remaining offenders.

    Anyone with information is urged to make contact on 131 444 or anonymously through Crime Stoppers on 1800 333 000.

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI China: Trump: Tariffs on Mexico paused until April 2

    Source: China State Council Information Office 3

    U.S. President Donald Trump attends a press conference at the White House in Washington D.C., the United States, Feb. 13, 2025. [Photo/Xinhua]

    U.S. President Donald Trump said on social media Thursday that tariffs on Mexico will be paused until April 2, applying to anything covered under the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

    “After speaking with President Claudia Sheinbaum of Mexico, I have agreed that Mexico will not be required to pay Tariffs on anything that falls under the USMCA Agreement. This Agreement is until April 2nd,” Trump said in a post on “Truth Social.”

    “I did this as an accommodation, and out of respect for, President Sheinbaum,” Trump said, noting that “our relationship has been a very good one.”

    Earlier that day, U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told CNBC that more one-month tariff exemptions under USMCA are “likely.”

    “It’s likely that it will cover all USMCA compliant goods and services, so that which is part of President Trump’s deal with Canada and Mexico are likely to get an exemption from these tariffs,” Lutnick said.

    Trump’s latest announcement on Mexico tariffs came one day after White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said that the president is granting a one-month exemption to three major automakers from the newly imposed 25 percent tariffs on Mexico and Canada.

    The United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) is a trade agreement negotiated, signed, and ultimately enacted during Trump’s first term, aimed at replacing the former North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA).

    On Feb. 1, Trump signed an executive order imposing a 25 percent tariff on products imported from Mexico and Canada, with a 10 percent tariff increase on Canadian energy products. On Feb. 3, Trump announced a 30-day delay in implementing the tariffs on both countries and continued negotiations. According to this decision, the relevant tariff measures took effect on March 4.

    Canada has announced retaliatory measures, while Mexico has signaled its intent to implement tariffs and other economic countermeasures. Businesses are increasingly concerned about the rising costs due to these tariffs, which could drive up consumer prices and contribute to an economic slowdown.

    The stock market has shown significant volatility in response to the new tariffs, with investor uncertainty mounting as fears of potential economic repercussions grow.

    The escalating tensions and economic uncertainties might have prompted Trump to reassess his trade policies.

    Trump has yet to make announcement on an overall pause on Canada tariffs. In a post on Truth Social Thursday, he accused Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau of using the tariff problem to further his reelection bid.

    Trudeau, meanwhile, said on Thursday that Canada will continue to be in a trade war with the United States for the foreseeable future.

    MIL OSI China News

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: BusinessNZ – Health system serious approach needed

    Source: BusinessNZ

    BusinessNZ has welcomed the Government’s commitment to better management of the health system.
    BusinessNZ Chief Executive Katherine Rich said a high-functioning health system was critical for enabling New Zealanders to lead healthy, productive lives.
    “Getting clear targets for things like GP access and elective surgery wait times, getting better value from health expenditure by working with private sector health providers, and ensuring adequate investment in health infrastructure indicates a serious approach is being taken to this critical sector.
    “Successful outcomes for patients is a key consideration where New Zealanders want to see responsible, competent use made of public funding,” Mrs Rich said.
    The BusinessNZ Network including BusinessNZ, EMA, Business Central, Business Canterbury and Business South, represents and provides services to thousands of businesses, small and large, throughout New Zealand.

    MIL OSI New Zealand News

  • MIL-Evening Report: More than two-thirds of organisations have a formal work-from-home policy. Here’s how the benefits stack up

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Christina Boedker, Professor, Business School, University of Newcastle

    Floral Deco/Shutterstock

    The opposition wants to call time on letting public servants work from home. In a speech to the Menzies Research Institute this week, shadow public service minister Jane Hume said, if elected, a Coalition government would require public servants in the office five days a week:

    While work from home arrangements can work, in the case of the [Australian Public Service], it has become a right that is creating inefficiency.

    Hume said Labor had given public servants a “blank cheque” to work from home, creating an “unsustainable” system that was no longer working.

    She stressed that exceptions “can and will be made”, but only “where they work for everyone rather than be enforced on teams by an individual”.

    Few workplace issues have drawn such heated debate as whether people should be allowed to work from home. The Coalition’s latest election promise, with parallels to a similar move by Donald Trump in the United States, has brought these questions back into the spotlight.

    What impact do work from home arrangements have, not only on performance and productivity but also employee wellbeing? Is it really wise to reverse course?

    Our research has examined these questions in detail – and we’ve found a changing picture.




    Read more:
    Dutton hints he’ll sack 36,000 public servants. Voters deserve to know what services will be affected


    Our research

    We have examined the impacts of working from home on staff performance and productivity in Australian workplaces as part of the Australian Workplace Index, surveying 2,932 Australian employees across 2022 and 2024.

    This is a research collaboration project between Australian National University and University of Newcastle.

    The Coalition argues public servants should return to the office.
    Ground Picture/Shutterstock

    An Australian Workplace Index 2022 working paper (which has not been peer-reviewed) actually suggested working from home was linked with a number of negative impacts.

    In 2022, we saw that compared to those who didn’t, employees who worked from home three to four days a week experienced lower wellbeing, higher depression and anxiety, and higher loneliness.

    They also experienced more administrative hassles, higher pressure to meet targets and increased levels of conflict with supervisors and colleagues.

    We found working from home was also associated with a reduction in staff productivity, job-target performance and an increase in staff turnover intentions.

    A changing picture

    We have recently completed analysis for a similar study based on data from 2024, to be published in an upcoming working paper. And it paints a very different picture.

    We found the negative impacts of working from home, originally found in 2022, had reversed in 2024.

    In the most recent 2024 Australian Workplace Index employment data, we see no significant difference in productivity between employees who work from home and those in the office.

    In fact, the latest data suggest numerous benefits.

    For example, staff who worked from home one or more days a week had 9.9% more autonomy in how they carried out their work. Those with higher job autonomy were up to 16.8% more productive in their work when compared to those with low job autonomy.

    We found staff who work from home also save on average 100 minutes in commuting time each day.

    But on top of this, staff who worked from home one or more days a week were 10.6% less burnt out from work compared to those who never did, and had reported lower intention to quit their jobs.

    A reduced need to commute is a major benefit of work-from-home arrangements.
    Adam Calaitzis/Shutterstock

    Better support for employees

    This positive trend likely reflects investment by employers in improving support for staff who work from home.

    In 2024, we found a majority of organisations (69%) now had a work-from-home policy in place.

    There was also an increase in the physical, technological and psychological infrastructure support available to staff who work from home. For example:

    • Physical: 82% of staff have a dedicated workspace, 93% have their own desk, and 93% have air conditioning.
    • Technological: 85% of staff have access to IT support, 94% have access to collaborative technology and 95% have internet access.
    • Psychological: 80% of staff have access to psychological support from their supervisor and 72% have access to counselling services.

    Importantly, employees still value the opportunity highly. Our 2024 data show 38% of Australian employees chose to work from home for 50% or more of their work hours.

    32% of Australian employees would prefer to exclusively work from home, 41% prefer a hybrid option, while 27% prefer to work exclusively from the office.

    Christina Boedker has received research grant funding from the University of Newcastle’s RSP Stimulus Funding Scheme and from The Australian National University for this research project.

    Kieron Meagher received research grant funding from the University of Newcastle’s RSP Stimulus Funding Scheme and from The Australian National University for this research project.

    Aeson Luiz Dela Cruz does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. More than two-thirds of organisations have a formal work-from-home policy. Here’s how the benefits stack up – https://theconversation.com/more-than-two-thirds-of-organisations-have-a-formal-work-from-home-policy-heres-how-the-benefits-stack-up-251598

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-OSI USA: Senate Advances Bipartisan Bill to Permanently Classify Illicit Fentanyl Knockoffs as Schedule I Drugs

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Washington Maria Cantwell
    03.06.25
    Senate Advances Bipartisan Bill to Permanently Classify Illicit Fentanyl Knockoffs as Schedule I Drugs
    Legislation would also enable research into fentanyl-related substances
    WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, the United States Senate voted 82-12 to advance the bipartisan Halt All Lethal Trafficking of (HALT) Fentanyl Act. U.S. Senator Maria Cantwell (D-WA), ranking member of the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation and senior member of the Senate Finance Committee, voted in favor of the bill.
    “The HALT Fentanyl Act maintains strong penalties for trafficking fentanyl, while allowing for important scientific research and medical applications to continue,” said Sen. Cantwell. “We still have more work to do on other bills to address the fentanyl scourge, from providing more treatment options, to additional resources for first responders, to more tools for law enforcement to stop traffickers and dealers.”
    The bill now awaits final passage by the Senate.
    The legislation would:
    Permanently schedule illicit fentanyl-related substances:
    Amends the Controlled Substances Act to permanently classify fentanyl-related substances as Schedule I.
    Ends the game of whack-a-mole Congress has played since 2018; Congress has repeatedly extended the first Trump administration’s temporary Schedule I classification of fentanyl-related substances.
    Locks in permanent classification of fentanyl-related substances before its temporary Schedule I status expires on March 31, 2025.
    Protect patients’ access to legitimate, FDA-approved fentanyl:
    Preserves the Schedule II status and FDA-approved use of fentanyl for legitimate medical purposes:
    Nine major medical associations affirmed the HALT Fentanyl Act’s distinction between illicit, fentanyl-related substances and FDA-approved fentanyl, citing the bill’s ability to, “effectively combat the illicit fentanyl epidemic while preserving access to legitimate, physician-directed pain management.”
    Support law enforcement and codify existing penalties:
    Maintains existing criminal penalties for fentanyl trafficking to ensure illicit manufacturers and traffickers can be fully prosecuted and victims and their families receive justice.
    Penalties under the HALT Fentanyl Act are identical to what current law dictates under the temporary scheduling of fentanyl-related substances.
    Utilizes the same class-scheduling rubric enacted seven years ago. This rubric has only ever been used to target lethal fentanyl-related substances and arrest defendants convicted of illicit drug trafficking and manufacturing.
    Advance scientific and medical research:
    Streamlines the registration process for Schedule I researchers, allowing more scientists to study fentanyl-related substances.
    Includes provisions to permit a single registration for related research sites, allowing researchers with ongoing studies to examine newly added fentanyl-related substances and authorize registered researchers to manufacture small quantities of fentanyl-related substances without a separate registration.
    In 2023 and 2024, Sen. Cantwell traveled across the State of Washington to 10 communities — Tacoma, Everett, Tri-Cities, Seattle, Spokane, Vancouver, Port Angeles, Walla Walla, Yakima, and Longview – hearing from people on the front lines of the fentanyl crisis, including first responders, law enforcement, health care providers, and people with firsthand experience of fentanyl addiction.  She also participated in the National Tribal Opioid Summit, a gathering of approximately 900 tribal leaders, health care workers, and first responders from across the country hosted by the Tulalip Tribes following the first-ever statewide summit hosted by the Lummi Nation.  Sen. Cantwell has since used what she heard in those roundtables and related events to craft and champion specific legislative solutions, including:
    The Stop Smuggling Illicit Synthetic Drugs on U.S. Transportation Networks Act, which would crack down on the trafficking of illicit synthetic drugs, like fentanyl, using the U.S. transportation network;
    The Opioid Overdose Data Collection Enhancement Act, which would expand the use of tools that record fatal and nonfatal overdoses in near-real time and help first responders deploy resources faster;
    The FEND Off Fentanyl Act, signed into law by President Joe Biden, which will help U.S. government agencies disrupt opioid supply chains by imposing sanctions on traffickers and fighting money laundering;
    The Fight Illicit Pill Presses Act, which would require that all pill presses be engraved with a serial number and impose penalties for the removal or alteration of the number.;
    The Combating Illicit Xylazine Act, which would list xylazine as a Schedule III controlled substance while protecting the drug’s legal use by veterinarians, farmers, and ranchers, enable the Drug Enforcement Administration to track xylazine’s manufacturing to ensure it is not diverted to the illicit market;
    The TRANQ Research Act of 2023, signed into law by President Biden, which will spur more research into xylazine (also called “tranq”) and other novel synthetic drugs by directing the National Institute of Standards and Technology to tackle these issues; and
    The Parity for Tribal Law Enforcement Act, which would bolster Tribal law enforcement agencies by helping them hire and retain tribal law enforcement officers by raising their retirement, pension, death, and injury benefits to be on part with those of federal law enforcement officers.
    In addition, Sen. Cantwell voted for a series of federal funding bills allocating $1.69 billion to combat fentanyl and other illicit drugs coming into the United States, including an additional $385.2 million to increase security at U.S. ports of entry, with the goal of catching more illegal drugs like fentanyl before they make it across the border.  Critical funding will go toward Non-Intrusive Inspection (NII) technology at land and sea ports of entries. NII technologies—like large-scale X-ray and Gamma ray imaging systems, as well as a variety of portable and handheld technologies—allow U.S. Customs and Border Protection to help detect and prevent contraband from being smuggled into the country without disrupting flow at the border.
    A full timeline of Sen. Cantwell’s actions to combat the fentanyl crisis is available HERE.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Video: RBNZ 35 years of flexible inflation targeting conference: Session 4 – Lessons from theory

    Source: Reserve Bank of New Zealand (video statements)

    Monetary policy as insurance – (01:03) Stefano Eusepi, Brown University; Christopher G. Gibbs, University of Sydney; Bruce Preston, University of New South Wales Business School.

    Should monetary and fiscal policy pull in the same direction? – (40:47) Drago Bergholt, Norges Bank; Øistein Røisland, Norges Bank; Tommy Sveen, BI Norwegian Business School; Ragnar Torvik, Norwegian University of Science and Technology.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WOP22ySgt6I

    MIL OSI Video

  • MIL-OSI USA: Shaheen Introduces Bipartisan, Bicameral Proposal to Make Child Care More Affordable

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for New Hampshire Jeanne Shaheen
    (Washington, DC) – U.S. Senator Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH) introduced the Child Care Availability and Affordability Act and the Child Care Workforce Act—bipartisan, bicameral legislation that together form a bold proposal to make child care more affordable and accessible by strengthening existing tax credits to lower child care costs and increase the supply of child care providers. The bill was co-led by U.S. Senators Katie Britt (R-AL), Tim Kaine (D-VA) and Joni Ernst (R-IA). U.S. Representatives Mike Lawler (NY-17) and Salud Carbajal (CA-24) introduced a companion bill in the U.S. House of Representatives. The bill includes language from Shaheen’s Right Start Child Care and Education Act legislation.
    “I hear time and again from parents in New Hampshire who are desperate for reliable, affordable child care options, but for too many families, their options are limited at best and nonexistent at worst,” said Senator Shaheen. “For an issue that impacts so many families in every corner of every state, it’s time we find a bipartisan path forward, which is why I’m proud to join my colleagues on this commonsense, bipartisan proposal to lower child care costs, increase wages for the workforce and ensure providers can keep their doors open.”
    Additional cosponsors of the Child Care Availability and Affordability Act include U.S. Senators John Curtis (R-UT), Angus King (I-ME), Shelley Moore Capito (R-WV), Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) and Susan Collins (R-ME). The bill text can be viewed here.
    The Child Care Workforce Act is also cosponsored by U.S. Senators King and Gillibrand. The proposal contains two bills because one proposes changes to existing tax credits, falling under the jurisdiction of the Senate Finance Committee, and the other authorizes a new pilot program, falling under the jurisdiction of the Senate HELP Committee. The bill text can be viewed here.
    The worsening child care crisis is holding families, child care workers, businesses and our entire economy back. Across the country, too many families cannot find—or afford—the high-quality child care they need so parents can go to work and children can thrive. Over the last few decades, the cost of child care has increased by 263%, forcing families—and mothers, in particular—to make impossible choices.
    More than half of all families live in child care deserts. Meanwhile, child care workers are struggling to make ends meet on their poverty-level wages and child care providers are struggling to simply stay afloat. The crisis—which was exacerbated by the pandemic—is costing our economy approximately $122 billion in economic losses each year.
    New national polling in conjunction with First Five Years Fund (FFYF) reflects overwhelming bipartisan support for the Child and Dependent Care Tax Credit (CDCTC), with 86% of voters in support of increasing the CDCTC. Additionally, 79% of Republican voters say they want President Trump and Republicans in Congress to do more to help hardworking families afford child care with 72% saying investing in child care is a good use of tax dollars. According to polling from Fabrizio Ward, 63% of all voters say helping working class families is their top priority when it comes to changes in tax policy.
    Senator Shaheen has been a leader in advocating for more affordable and accessible child care, including by delivering more than $77 million to New Hampshire through the American Rescue Plan and other COVID relief laws to the Granite State. Since then, Shaheen had urged state and local officials to distribute those federal funds, especially in communities that lack access to child care. In August, Shaheen visited Colebrook Community Child Care Center to discuss challenges and solutions to the child care crisis in rural communities, and in October Shaheen hosted Acting Secretary of Labor Julie Su for a discussion on child care and workforce challenges in Brentwood. 
    Last year, Shaheen introduced the Right Start Child Care and Education Act, which would make child care more affordable and accessible for working families by reforming the federal tax code. She also introduced the bipartisan Expanding Child Care for Military Families Act. Additionally, she helped introduce the Child and Dependent Care Tax Credit Enhancement Act to permanently expand the Child and Dependent Care Tax Credit, which helps households offset their child care costs.
    Last April, Shaheen convened a hearing as former Chair of the U.S. Senate Small Business and Entrepreneurship Committee to hear testimony from expert witnesses on the child care industry’s broken business model and what Congress can do to support small business child care providers, employees and families. A subsequent U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) Office of Advocacy issue brief, in response to data challenges raised at the hearing, details the role of small businesses in the child care industry and fills data gaps in child care industry research.
    Last Congress, Shaheen helped introduce the Child Care Stabilization Act, which would provide additional federal child care stabilization funding—which was provided in the American Rescue Plan—and ensure that child care providers can keep their doors open and continue serving children and families in every part of the country. Shaheen joined Senator Patty Murray (D-WA) to introduce the Child Care for Working Families Act, which would provide affordable child care for all working families, expand access to preschool programs and increase wages for early childhood workers. She also joined U.S. Senators Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) and Dan Sullivan (R-AK) in reintroducing the bipartisan Childcare Workforce and Facilities Act to address the national shortage of affordable, quality child care, especially in rural communities. In the government funding bill for fiscal year (FY) 2024, Senator Shaheen worked to include a $1 billion increase for early education, including a $725 million increase to $8.75 billion for Child Care and Development Block Grants to states and a $275 million increase to Head Start4. The law additionally included $315 million for Preschool Development Grants.
    The Child Care Availability and Affordability Act is endorsed by A+ Education Partnership, Alabama Arise, Alabama School Readiness Alliance, American Federation of Teachers (AFT), Bipartisan Policy Center Action (BPCA), Business Council of Alabama, Care.com, Chamber of Progress, Chamber RVA, Child Care Aware of America (CCAoA), Child Care Aware of Virginia, Children’s Institute, Early Care & Education Consortium (ECEC), Educare Learning Network, FFYF, Gingerbread Kids Academy, Hampton Roads Chamber, Healthy Kids AL, KinderCare Learning Companies, Manufacture Alabama, Metrix IQ, Mobile Area Education Foundation, National Association of Women Business Owners (NAWBO), National Child Care Association (NCCA), Northern Virginia Chamber of Commerce (NVC), Save the Children, Small Business Majority, Start Early, Third Way, U.S. Chamber of Commerce, Virginia Chamber of Commerce, Virginia Early Childhood Foundation (VECF), VOICES for Alabama’s Children and Voices for Virginia’s Kids. In addition to those groups, the Child Care Workforce Act is endorsed by the National Association for Family Child Care (NAFCC), National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC) and ZERO TO THREE.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI China: Trump pauses some Canada and Mexico tariffs until April 2

    Source: China State Council Information Office

    U.S. President Donald Trump said on social media Thursday that tariffs on Mexico will be paused until April 2, applying to anything covered under the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

    “After speaking with President Claudia Sheinbaum of Mexico, I have agreed that Mexico will not be required to pay Tariffs on anything that falls under the USMCA Agreement. This Agreement is until April 2nd,” Trump said in a post on “Truth Social.”

    “I did this as an accommodation, and out of respect for, President Sheinbaum,” Trump said, noting that “our relationship has been a very good one.”

    Earlier that day, U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told CNBC that more one-month tariff exemptions under USMCA are “likely.”

    “It’s likely that it will cover all USMCA compliant goods and services, so that which is part of President Trump’s deal with Canada and Mexico are likely to get an exemption from these tariffs,” Lutnick said.

    Trump’s latest announcement on Mexico tariffs came one day after White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said that the president is granting a one-month exemption to three major automakers from the newly imposed 25 percent tariffs on Mexico and Canada.

    The United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) is a trade agreement negotiated, signed, and ultimately enacted during Trump’s first term, aimed at replacing the former North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA).

    On Feb. 1, Trump signed an executive order imposing a 25 percent tariff on products imported from Mexico and Canada, with a 10 percent tariff increase on Canadian energy products. On Feb. 3, Trump announced a 30-day delay in implementing the tariffs on both countries and continued negotiations. According to this decision, the relevant tariff measures took effect on March 4.

    Canada has announced retaliatory measures, while Mexico has signaled its intent to implement tariffs and other economic countermeasures. Businesses are increasingly concerned about the rising costs due to these tariffs, which could drive up consumer prices and contribute to an economic slowdown.

    The stock market has shown significant volatility in response to the new tariffs, with investor uncertainty mounting as fears of potential economic repercussions grow.

    The escalating tensions and economic uncertainties might have prompted Trump to reassess his trade policies.

    Trump has yet to make announcement on an overall pause on Canada tariffs. In a post on Truth Social Thursday, he accused Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau of using the tariff problem to further his reelection bid.

    Trudeau, meanwhile, said on Thursday that Canada will continue to be in a trade war with the United States for the foreseeable future.

    MIL OSI China News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Fischer Questions Expert Witnesses on Defense Mobilization

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Nebraska Deb Fischer
    Today, U.S. Senator Deb Fischer (R-Neb.), a senior member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, questioned expert witnesses about the use of the Defense Protection Act (DPA) for defense mobilization. She asked the witnesses about ensuring that the DPA is invoked only for situations that truly relate to national defense.
    During the hearing, Senator Fischer questioned Founder and Chief Executive Officer of MMR Defense Solutions Dr. Christine Michienzi on whether she recommends any statutory changes to better define what qualifies as national defense.
    Additionally, Senator Fischer asked Dr. John McGinn, Executive Director of the Greg and Camille Baroni Center for Government Contracting at George Mason University’s Costello College of Business, for his assessment of the Department of Defense’s National Defense Industrial Strategy and any recommendations he would propose for implementation.
    Click the image above to watch a video of Senator Fischer’s questioning
    Click here to download audio
    Click here to download video
    Fischer Questions Expert Witnesses:
    Senator Fischer: I strongly believe the administration should maximize its use of the Defense Production Act. They have the authority to address challenges in our defense industrial base. However, I am concerned by the expanding definition of what qualifies as national defense. For example, in 2022 President Biden invoked the Defense Production Act to ramp up domestic production of clean energy technologies. Dr. McGinn, how should the Defense Production Act be used for defense mobilization? Should the DPA investments be focused on areas clearly related to the national defense of this country?
    Dr. McGinn: Thank you very much, Senator Fischer. Yes, the Defense Production Act is an incredibly powerful tool, and it is best used for national security defense purposes. And that’s how it’s been used during the development of the MRAP during the Afghanistan and Iraq War. That’s how it was used during COVID, and that’s how it’s being used to rebuild our defense industrial base in areas such as rare earth processing, castings, and forgings and the like, specialty chemicals. So, that is how it is best used. And the more it is focused on national defense, it is not a political issue, therefore it’s a national security issue.Senator Fischer: Thank you. And how should the Act be used for defense mobilization? Should the investments be focused on areas clearly related to being able to get that done?Dr. Michienzi: Thank you. I just wanted to make sure, it should absolutely be focused on mobilization efforts. But some of the efforts that DPA is funding now, it’s difficult sometimes to realize that those go towards mobilization—so things that Jerry mentioned, such as rare earth processing and critical chemicals.Senator Fischer: Would you look at any statutory changes to be able to make it work and make it identify, truly, what is national defense? Is there anything we need to be looking at here?
    Dr. Michienzi: I think making sure that it is centered on national defense issues and national security is critically important, as Dr. McGinn mentioned, because we don’t want to dilute the efforts of the DPA that are being very successfully used currently and can be used going forward. 
    Senator Fischer: Thank you. Dr. McGinn, in January of 2024, the Department released its first National Defense Industrial Strategy, and later in October, released an implementation plan. What’s your assessment of the strategy?
    Dr. McGinn: Well, I think the strategy did a very good job at kind of bringing together a lot of efforts that have been led across recent administrations. One of the good things about this area is it’s very bipartisan. There’s been a lot of similar themes being addressed across the Obama administration, through the Trump administration first, through Biden and today’s. So, I think that the strategy did a good job at identifying the progress that has been made, but also setting a vector for the future. And I think that there were a number of good things in that report. I particularly like the focus on importance of production as well as the importance of working with allies and partners. The key will be kind of how that’s instantiated in the FY26 budget submission.
    Senator Fischer: Are there any additional areas that you’d recommend the Department would consider that maybe were lacking from the previous strategies?
    Dr. McGinn: I think two things I would recommend. One is mobilization. I mean it’s mentioned briefly in the strategy, but there’s no talking about restarting mobilization planning. I mean there actually are program elements in the Army, Navy, and Air Force, Marines for mobilization, but they’re really all about pre-positioning equipment and the like. There’s no planning function that’s being done today; that all stopped and that needs to be restarted. And then the other area that is on—the strategy talks a lot about it—building exportability in systems. That is building systems so that we can share them with our partners and allies. That requires investment in terms of—because you’re going to have different capability levels—of different missiles going to different partners, depending on how close they are. So that requires investment up front, and that’s a big priority that needs to be invested in, in terms of making exportability a priority in acquisition and also investing in the technology needed to build that capability.Senator Fischer: Thank you.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Health and Politics – No place for privatisation in health – alarm bells should be ringing – PSA

    Source: PSA

    The unveiling of the Health Minister’s new priorities is a clear signal that the Government wants to rely on the private sector to deliver health services rather than properly funding a public health system.
    “The Government’s privatisation agenda has been well and truly exposed in Minister Brown’s priorities,” said Fleur Fitzsimons, National Secretary for the Public Service Association Te Pūkenga Here Tikanga Mahi.
    “These amount to a slippery slope to an American style health system and the continued running down of our public health system. Alarm bells should be ringing.”
    In a speech to the BusinessNZ Health Forum, the Minister has asked Health NZ to work with the private sector to agree a set of principles that will underpin future outsourcing contracts, including ‘negotiating longer-term, multi-year agreements to deliver better value for money and better outcomes for patients’.
    “Privatisation is never the answer to health – but the Government has embarked on a campaign to run down the public health system so it can justify the pursuit of a privatisation agenda based on a flawed ideology. It only lines the pockets of corporate health companies and won’t help New Zealanders get the health care they need.”
    Fitzsimons said the Government is being irresponsible – the PSA’s recent survey of health workers exposes how the cuts and other changes are impacting frontline services despite the Government’s repeated promises to the contrary.
    “The fundamental problem in health is that the Government is starving the system of the funding needed to run it. Instead of reducing funding the Government should be increasing it and lifting the damaging hiring freeze for health workers.
    “The money the Government is spending on tax cuts for landlords, and support for tobacco companies would have been better invested in improving health care.
    “That’s why we started litigation in the Employment Relations Authority aimed at stopping the rushed and damaging job cuts in health to meet the Government’s savings targets.
    “These cuts will endanger the lives of patients and see thousands of dedicated and essential health workers lose their jobs,” said Fitzsimons.

    MIL OSI New Zealand News

  • MIL-Evening Report: ‘No-one wants to go through this again’: how disaster-stricken residents in northern NSW are preparing for Cyclone Alfred

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Rebecca McNaught, Research Fellow, University of Sydney

    It’s been three years since floods pummelled the Northern Rivers region of New South Wales. Now, Cyclone Alfred is heading for the region, threatening devastation once more.

    On Thursday night and Friday morning, the NSW State Emergency Service asked residents in parts of the Northern Rivers to evacuate. Rain associated with Cyclone Alfred was expected to cause rapid river rises and extensive flooding.

    As you’d expect, many Northern Rivers residents feel very apprehensive right now. No-one wants to go through this again.

    I know of a woman who, just last week, had painters doing final repairs to her home after it flooded in 2022. Other people can’t afford to repair their homes at all.

    Damage from the last floods extends beyond the material. Many people in the Northern Rivers are still dealing with mental health problems such as anxiety, depression and PTSD after the last disaster.

    Still, people are preparing for Cyclone Alfred’s arrival – and drawing lessons from the 2022 floods in the hope of a better outcome this time.

    Memories of Lismore floods

    I have 20 years’ experience working on climate change adaptation and disaster risk management. My research focus includes the Northern Rivers, where I live. Last year, a study I led examined community collaboration across the region in response to disasters.

    The Northern Rivers is located in the NSW northeast and is drained by three major rivers: the Richmond, Tweed and Clarence. The city of Lismore is one of the most flood-prone urban centres in Australia.

    As my colleagues and I have previously written, the 2022 flood in Lismore and surrounds surprised even the most prepared residents.

    Floodwaters in Lismore reached more than two metres higher than the previous record. Shocked residents were left clinging to their roofs. Businesses moved their stock to higher ground, but it was still destroyed. Houses above the so-called “flood line” were inundated.

    Warning systems proved inadequate, and emergency agencies were overwhelmed. More than 10,800 homes were damaged.

    Landslides and boulders fell on homes and roads, leaving people trapped and isolated for up to six weeks. Others could not access cash, petrol, communications, food, schools, carer services and medical assistance for long periods.

    The 2022 floods were by no means the first disaster to befall the Northern Rivers. The region also flooded in 2017. In 2019 the region, like much of Australia, was deep in drought. The Black Summer bushfires hit in 2019-20, and Covid-19 struck in 2020. Parts of the region suffered bushfires in 2023.

    Now, we are facing Cyclone Alfred.

    The scale of the 2022 floods forced many residents to confront a harsh reality: in a disaster, emergency services cannot always help. Sometimes, people must fend for themselves.

    That realisation prompted a growing community-led resilience movement. As Cyclone Alfred approaches, that network has swung into action.




    Read more:
    When disaster strikes, emergency responders can’t respond to every call. Communities must be helped to help themselves


    A community coming together

    Since 2022, community-resilience groups have emerged in each local government area across the region. The groups comprise, and are led by, community volunteers.

    In my local government area, Byron Shire, there are 13 community resilience groups. I co-lead my local group.

    We work with local organisations, government agencies and emergency services to help the community before, during and after a disaster. The local council convenes regular meetings between all these organisations.

    My research shows strong information flows are crucial in disaster preparedness and recovery.

    Since the Cyclone Alfred threat began, my community group has received regular updates from the SES on matters such as locations of sandbags and sand, the latest weather information advice, and when evacuation centres will open.

    We also have an established a network of contacts who live on streets vulnerable to flooding. We pass on relevant information to other residents via Facebook and a WhatsApp group. In the past day we have been exchanging information such as whether flood pumps are working and the extent of beach erosion.

    The flow of information is two-way. Byron Shire’s community resilience network is chaired by the local council, and has links to emergency management – the “lights and sirens” people. In this way, community knowledge and contributions are recognised and valued by decision-makers and other officials.

    In recent days our group has fed advice up the chain to emergency services, such as the location of elderly and vulnerable people who may need help to evacuate.

    A man holding a portable emergency satellite provided to a community resilience group in the Northern Rivers.
    Facebook

    Byron Shire Council has also loaned portable Starlink satellite dishes to some community-resilience groups. These devices provide essential and communication if phone and internet services fail in a disaster.

    On a broader level, the Bureau of Meteorology is producing regular video updates about Cyclone Alfred in clear, plain language. This is helping to communicate the risks widely and give people the information they need.

    Community resilience groups also seek to adopt a proactive, rather than reactive, approach to disasters – such as helping residents prepare for the next flood event.

    This can be challenging. Many people and organisations in the region have understandably been focused on recovery after the 2022 floods. It can be hard to do this while also preparing for the next disaster.

    And sometimes, people don’t want constant reminders of the potential for flooding. Some people just want to move on and think about something other than disaster.

    If Cyclone Alfred brings destruction to the Northern Rivers, community resilience groups will play a big role in supporting health and wellbeing. Not everyone accesses formal mental health support after disasters. Communities and neighbours looking out for each other is crucial.

    Tough times ahead

    As I write, the Northern Rivers is starting to lose power and internet access. Winds are wild and rain lashed the region all night.

    As climate change worsens, all communities must consider how they will cope with more intense disasters. The model of community-led resilience in the Northern Rivers shows a way forward.

    There is still much work to do in the region. However, our experience of compounding disasters means we are well along the path to finding new ways to support each other through extreme events.




    Read more:
    Lismore faced monster floods all but alone. We must get better at climate adaptation, and fast


    Rebecca McNaught is a Research Fellow at the University Centre for Rural Health (University of Sydney) in Lismore. She has received scholarship funding from the Australian Government’s Research Training Program Stipend. She is affiliated with the South Golden Beach, New Brighton and Ocean Shores Community Resilience Team. She has also conducted paid and voluntary work for the Northern Rivers not-for-profit registered charity Plan C.

    ref. ‘No-one wants to go through this again’: how disaster-stricken residents in northern NSW are preparing for Cyclone Alfred – https://theconversation.com/no-one-wants-to-go-through-this-again-how-disaster-stricken-residents-in-northern-nsw-are-preparing-for-cyclone-alfred-251650

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-OSI Video: RBNZ 35 years of flexible inflation targeting conference: Keynote address from Dr. Catherine L. Mann

    Source: Reserve Bank of New Zealand (video statements)

    Opening Remarks – Assistant Governor Karen Silk (00:04)

    Keynote address: Holding anchor in turbulent waters – (08:20) Catherine L. Mann, External Member of the Monetary Policy Committee of the Bank of England, Professor at Alliance Manchester Business School and Brandeis University.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SKLYDQ_EdGw

    MIL OSI Video

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Health Minister outlines 5 key health priorities

    Source: New Zealand Government

    Health Minister Simeon Brown has today released his five key priorities for Health New Zealand in a speech to the BusinessNZ Health Forum in Auckland.

    “The Government is investing a record $16.68 billion of additional funding in health, but we need to ensure Kiwis are seeing improved outcomes from this significant expenditure. 

    “Under the last Government, the system was focused on bureaucratic restrictions, rather than delivery for patients. 

    “I am putting the focus firmly back on patients, and ensuring the health system puts those it serves first. 

    “I have today released my five key health priorities as Minister of Health:
     

    1. Focusing Health New Zealand on delivering the basics and achieving targets
    2. Fixing primary healthcare to ensure Kiwis have timely access to a doctor.
    3. Reducing emergency department wait times so that 95 percent of people are admitted, discharged, or transferred within six hours.
    4. Clearing the elective surgery backlog by partnering with the private sector to deliver more planned care.
    5. Investing in health infrastructure, both physical and digital, so that we are building for the future.

    “This plan is underpinned by a focus on putting patients first and supporting our frontline healthcare workers to deliver the healthcare New Zealanders need in a timely and quality manner. 

    “I promise every New Zealander: we will not stop until our health system delivers timely, quality care to all,” Mr Brown says.

    MIL OSI New Zealand News

  • MIL-OSI China: China to boost policy mix to ensure sustained growth in 2025

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    BEIJING, March 6 — China will intensify its macroeconomic policy this year, with a significant increase in government spending and a greater focus on consumption and innovation to chart a path of steady growth amid a complex global landscape.

    Senior government officials elaborated on specific pro-growth measures ranging from interest rate cuts to increased funding for small firms, at a press conference held Thursday on the sidelines of the third session of the 14th National People’s Congress.

    STRONGER FISCAL SUPPORT

    China will have a 4-percent deficit-to-GDP ratio and a government deficit of 5.66 trillion yuan (about 790 billion U.S. dollars) in 2025, according to the government work report submitted to the national legislature for deliberation.

    Both figures are at their highest levels in recent years, indicating strengthened counter-cyclical adjustment, Minister of Finance Lan Fo’an said at the press conference. The country will issue 4.4 trillion yuan of local government special-purpose bonds and 1.3 trillion yuan of ultra-long special treasury bonds.

    Analysts believe the expanding fiscal expenditure will shore up sustained economic and social development.

    There will be over 5 trillion yuan of government spending on construction investment this year, said Zheng Shanjie, head of the National Development and Reform Commission.

    “We will support private enterprises in investing in emerging and future industries, and introduce a number of attractive major projects in areas such as railways, nuclear power, water conservancy, and major scientific and technological infrastructure,” Zheng said.

    SUPPORTIVE MONETARY POLICY

    China will cut reserve requirement ratios (RRRs) and interest rates when appropriate this year, in line with domestic and international economic and financial conditions, as well as the performance of financial markets, said Pan Gongsheng, governor of the People’s Bank of China, the country’s central bank.

    The average RRR for China’s financial institutions now stands at 6.6 percent, and there is still room for further reduction, Pan said.

    According to the government work report, China will adopt a moderately loose monetary policy this year.

    Pan said the central bank will utilize multiple tools to offer adequate liquidity and bring down financing costs.

    Strengthened supportive measures will be seen in key areas and weak links including green finance, micro and small firms, and pension finance, Pan said.

    CONSUMPTION AS PRIMARY DRIVER

    As consumption continues to serve as the primary driving force for the economy, improving consumer sentiment will remain high on the government’s work agenda.

    Zheng said that government funding for the national consumer goods trade-in program will increase from 150 billion yuan last year to 300 billion yuan in 2025.

    The trade-in program, launched a year ago, has played a vital role in revitalizing consumer markets. In 2024, it led to sales exceeding 1.3 trillion yuan, including over 6.8 million vehicles, 56 million home appliances and 1.38 million e-bikes.

    There will also be further policies to bolster services consumption this year, Commerce Minister Wang Wentao said, citing measures to open the telecom, medical services and education sectors, and to increase the diversified supply of health, elderly care, child care and domestic services.

    More efforts will be made to innovate services consumption scenarios to meet people’s diversified and high-quality consumption needs in an improved manner, Wang said.

    DYNAMIC FORCES

    With its remarkable progress in technological innovation in 2024, the country will step up efforts to drive the development of new quality productive forces this year.

    Zheng said that China will establish a national venture capital guidance fund to drive nearly 1 trillion yuan of local and private funds to invest in tech firms in a market-oriented manner.

    Efforts will also be made to nurture a talent pool, including strategic scientists, outstanding entrepreneurs, top-tier engineers, master artisans and other highly skilled professions, Zheng said, adding that an open and inclusive innovation ecosystem will be created.

    From AI models like DeepSeek to humanoid robots and intelligent cars, China continues to make significant technological strides. Last year, high-tech manufacturing and equipment manufacturing accounted for 16.3 percent and 34.6 percent of China’s total industrial output, respectively.

    DEFUSING LOCAL DEBT RISK

    In 2024, China unveiled a major local government debt replacement program worth 6 trillion yuan, with an annual quota of 2 trillion yuan from the same year. The program allows local governments to issue new bonds to replace hidden debts.

    Bonds issued through the program last year saw an average reduction in local debt interest rates of over 2.5 percentage points. It is estimated that these bonds will reduce interest payments by over 200 billion yuan over five years, significantly easing funding pressures and interest costs for local governments, Lan noted.

    China’s local government debt risks have been effectively mitigated, he said.

    With eased debt burdens, local governments are capable of earmarking more funds for education and health care to improve people’s well-being and supporting technological innovation and consumption for high-quality development, analysts said.

    Lan said that the Ministry of Finance will guide the timely replacement of local debts this year, promote the transformation of local financing vehicles, and resolutely curb new hidden debts.

    MIL OSI China News

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Speech to the BusinessNZ Health Forum

    Source: New Zealand Government

    Check against delivery.
     
    Kia ora koutou. Thank you, Phil, for the opportunity to speak to you today to the Business NZ Health Forum. Since my appointment as Health Minister, I’ve spent time where it matters most – on the frontline, listening to the people our health system is here to serve. Let me tell you about just a few stories I have heard.There are many positive stories of people receiving exceptional healthcare: 
     

    A Tauranga woman who recently shared her gratitude with me that her chemotherapy drug is now funded because of the Government’s record investment in new cancer drugs.  
    A young person in distress, whose family isn’t sure what to do, being helped by compassionate youth mental health services to work through how to cope.  
    A security guard I met who said he went to an Emergency Department and was seen and discharged in 2.5 hours.

    Review hospital systems from admission to discharge, ensuring patients flow smoothly.

     
    But some are more grim:
     

    An elderly man who requires hip and knee surgery and has been living in pain while they wait for their operations. 
    A cancer survivor who is overdue for their colonoscopy. 
    A person who is worried about a friend that has been waiting for surgery for over for 15 months, only to find out it has been cancelled. 

     
    The failure of our health system doesn’t stop at waiting lists. 

    I’ve heard of a grandmother sent home after waiting for hours in ED, only to return shortly after having had a stroke.

    A grandfather lying in a hospital ward for days, sick and in pain, not knowing when—or if—a doctor would come to see him and tell him what is wrong. 

    And I’ve heard far too many stories over the past five weeks of people who are alive today, not because the system looked after them, but because their wives, husbands, daughters, and sons had to make lots of noise until someone paid attention. 

    That’s not a health system that works.  And if you ask the doctors, nurses, midwives, and other health professionals who keep the system running, they’ll tell you the same thing.  They are just as frustrated—because they got into this job to care for people and provide world-class healthcare to New Zealanders. But the system is failing their patients and them too. Somewhere along the way, our health system became desensitised to patients.  There’s often too much focus on what the unions, the colleges, or professional lobby groups say, and not enough focus on what the patient says.  Because in healthcare, the customer is the patient—the mum with the newborn, the tradie, the farmer, the kaumātua, the grandmother.  They should be at the heart of every decision we make. People working in health have been conditioned to substandard management and conditioned to giving into groups which exert pressure on them.This is not the standard we should accept in New Zealand.  That’s why we must fix the system—so that every patient gets the care they deserve, and every healthcare professional is empowered to do the job they trained so long and hard for. New Zealanders expect better. And under this Government, we will deliver it. 

    A long-term problem made worse by Labour 

    Let’s be clear—this is not a new problem.  Our health system has been overloaded and under pressure for years. But the decisions of the previous government made it significantly worse. We inherited a health system in a state of turmoil.In the middle of a pandemic—when New Zealand needed stability—they ripped the entire structure apart.  They forced through one of the biggest bureaucratic restructures in our history, abolishing 20 District Health Boards overnight and replacing them with a single, centralised bureaucracy.  The reforms stripped decision-making away from regions and districts.They had no plan for how it would actually help patients. Key health targets – used to ensure the system was delivering for patients – were dumped.Instead of supporting frontline workers, they created another layer of bureaucratic management and confusion at the top.  Instead of focusing on patient care and ensuring people didn’t get sicker languishing on ballooning waiting lists, they produced internal reports and shuffled job titles in the head office.  Instead of keeping control of spending, they lost complete oversight of the system’s finances. To put it frankly, the previous government’s 2022 health reforms were rushed and poorly implemented, with disastrous results. Most importantly, those reforms eroded the trust and confidence of New Zealanders in getting access to the health services they need.It’s not just our view. It’s not just what frontline workers and patients say. It’s now documented fact. 
     
    The Deloitte Report – Labour’s health system failure in black and white 

    Today, a report by Deloitte titled the ‘Financial Review of Health New Zealand’—an independent report, not written by politicians, but by financial and operational experts – is being released on Health New Zealand’s website.It delivers a damning verdict on the state of our health system when we took office 16 months ago. The report shows, in black and white, that under the previous government, Health New Zealand lost control of the critical levers that drive financial and delivery outcomes.In simple terms: 

    The agency that was supposed to run our health system had no idea how it was spending its money or the results it was achieving.

    Costs spiralled out of control, with deficits mounting each month. 

    Basic financial oversight collapsed, meaning no accountability, no performance tracking, and no ability to measure success or failure. 

    No systems in place to manage funds appropriately.

     
    Meanwhile, Labour’s plan was to support unions over patients.  As I mentioned earlier, they scrapped health targets, so they didn’t even know what success looked like.
      
    The result? 

    Elective surgeries plummeted. In 2017, 1,037 people were waiting over four months for elective treatment. By the time Labour left office, that number had grown to 27,497. That’s an increase of over 2,551 percent. 

    Emergency department wait times blew out. When National left office, almost 90 percent of patients were seen within six hours. By 2023, that dropped below 70 percent. 

    Childhood immunisation rates collapsed. In 2017, 92.4 percent of children were fully immunised at 24 months. By 2023, that number hit 83 percent. 

    Primary healthcare was ignored. More people than ever couldn’t see a healthcare professional when they needed one. 

     
    This is a system under significant pressure and a system which was recklessly mismanaged under the past government, thrown into turmoil at the worst possible time, and left to drift without accountability. But that changes today. 
     
    Funding for Health

    There is always a need for more investment in health, but more money isn’t the only solution.This Government has invested a record funding boost of $16.68 billion (over three years) in health to help the sector plan for the future, and that includes funding expected growth. The funding boost provided by this Government is enabling Health New Zealand to retain capacity at the frontline and deliver more services to New Zealanders.There are more frontline staff, including more nurses than ever before and more medical staff, allied and scientific staff, and care and support staff.Since it was set up, Health New Zealand’s frontline staff grew by almost 6,500 people, alongside achieving back-office efficiencies. Remuneration for health workforces has also increased.Since 2014, average salaries for nurses and midwives have increased by almost 70 percent, while average salaries for teachers and police have only risen by approximately 35-40 percent over the same period. The average salary of a registered nurse (including senior nurses) is currently around $125,660, including overtime and allowances. This aligns with nurses in New South Wales.Yet we are not seeing the results we have invested in.Productivity is declining and has not kept pace with historic levels of funding and workforce growth.For example, in the decade between 2014 and 2024, core Health operating funding almost doubled, but the number of first specialist assessments undertaken only increased by 17 percent. The waiting list more than doubled during this period to almost 195,000 people.  And as at August last year, over 40 percent of adults needing to see a GP couldn’t get a consultation within a week of when they needed to see one. Every single dollar must deliver better outcomes for patients.  More money going in must mean more results coming out.  But under Labour, we saw more money with worse outcomes, longer waitlists, and declining service levels. That is simply unacceptable. 
     
    What we have done – A back-to-basics approach 

    Since being in office, this Government has been taking action and we are getting results: 

    We reinstated health targets—because what gets measured, gets done.  
    We’re doing more operations. Last year, the health system carried out over 144,000 elective procedures – 10,000 more than the previous 12 months. 
    We are moving resources back to the frontline, cutting wasteful bureaucracy.  
    The health workforce is being paid more. 
    We’re investing in health infrastructure—building new hospitals, upgrading existing ones, and modernising equipment. There are currently 66 Ministerially approved health infrastructure projects, worth a cumulative $6.3 billion in the pipeline. 
    We have begun stabilising the system, although there’s still a long way to go.

    But let me be clear—this is just the beginning.
     
    My five key priorities as Minister
    Healthcare is a top priority for everyone in New Zealand. I see it every day as an electorate MP, a father of three young children, and as Health Minister travelling the country. Yes, there will always be a need for more money in healthcare, and as Minister, I will fight every single day to invest more and deliver more for you.I am proud of the investment this Government is putting into health. However, I will also be holding the system to account to deliver more for the funding that is being invested.Investing in primary care and funding additional operations are at the heart of my five clear priorities as Health Minister. They are:
     

    Stabilising Health New Zealand’s governance and accountability allowing it to focus on delivering the basics
    Reducing emergency department wait times
    Delivering a boost in elective surgery volumes to get on top of the backlog and reduce waiting lists
    Fixing primary care to ensure easier access 
    Providing clarity on the health infrastructure investment pipeline.

     
    1. Focusing Health New Zealand on delivering the basics
    My first priority is getting the basics right. It follows years of worsening results being the only thing being delivered.We are going to turn this around by focusing on delivery and achieving targets. Our health targets matter because they demonstrate performance. But it’s not enough to have them on paper—we must deliver real results. Over the last few years, the previous Government’s decision to restructure in the middle of a pandemic—and to remove those targets—led us to where we are now. Too many people are waiting too long for critical assessments and treatments.Health New Zealand should run a health system, not a bureaucracy. Instead of focusing on patients, it got lost in process. That changes now.No more excuses. We measure success in one way: better outcomes for patients.Health New Zealand has struggled to come together as a cohesive team that supports the organisation to deliver for patients. Senior Leadership Team members have only just begun weekly in-person meetings, and have continued to operate from different offices, despite the majority living in Auckland and the organisation being two and a half years old.This has meant the organisation has failed to create a cohesive team to lead the organisation forward.Today, I’m outlining my expectations for Health NZ to deliver a nationally planned and consistent, but locally delivered, health system. I expect core services (infrastructure, data, digital, HR, comms) will sit at head office, with national executive leadership focused on national programmes, shared services, overall governance and planning and empowering districts. I have directed the Commissioner to accelerate the shift to local decision-making and service delivery, and set a requirement for local delivery plans to be developed. I expect this to be done by July.This will enable local leaders to plan effectively, be clear about their budgets, allocate resource to where it’s most needed, and deliver better outcomes for their communities.Because all healthcare is local.I expect there to be strong regional coordination to support local delivery, with singular lines of accountability flowing from the national executive level through to the frontline.Under Labour, financial controls vanished, clinical input was lost, and local districts were disempowered. We are restoring that.Today, I have issued a new letter of expectation and Health New Zealand has released its delivery plan to reflect this.I will also bring back a board for Health New Zealand. Now that the plan is set, it is time to begin the process of transitioning to traditional governance.In the coming weeks, nominations open for the new board. If you have passion for healthcare and a demonstrated track record of delivery, we need you.I’d like to take this opportunity to thank the Commissioners for their work to date and I look forward to working with them as they deliver on their plan and as we transition to a board.
     
    2. Fixing Primary Healthcare – easier access for everyone
    My second priority is ensuring timely GP access. New Zealand has a shortage of family doctors, who play an important role in helping Kiwis to stay well and out of emergency departments.But last year a third of GP practices had their books closed, forcing people to emergency departments. And if you can’t book in to see your GP or nurse when you need one, you end up in ED when you shouldn’t have to. No one should wait weeks to see a GP and we are set on fixing that.Historically, more funding has been invested in more costly hospital and specialist services at the expense of primary and community care. Over the past five years, hospital funding has increased at a higher rate than primary and community funding. Hospital funding went up by almost 53 percent, while primary and community funding increased by 41 percent.This means we’re missing opportunities for earlier and less costly interventions.We must shift the dial towards primary care, both to improve access for New Zealanders and because it is the fiscally responsible thing to do.We have already made a number of important announcements this week about how we will improve access to primary care including: 
     

    Making it easier for New Zealanders to see a doctor. We’re providing up to 100 clinical placements for overseas-trained doctors to work in primary care. This will support their transition into GP practices that need them most.  

    We are also ramping up the number of trainee GPs to give Kiwis better access to healthcare in their communities. We’re introducing a funded primary care pathway to registration for up to 50 New Zealand-trained graduate doctors each year from 2026.

    We’re training more new doctors. During the term of this Government, medical school placement have increased by 100 places each year.

    We’re investing to increase the number of nurses in primary care. This includes supporting GP practices and other providers outside hospitals to hire up to 400 graduate registered nurses a year from this year.

    Improving access to 24/7 digital care. This will provide all New Zealanders with better and faster access to video consultations with New Zealand-registered clinicians, such as GPs and nurse practitioners, for urgent problems, 24 hours a day, seven days a week. People will be able to be diagnosed, get prescriptions, be referred for lab tests or radiology, and have urgent referrals organised.

    These measures focus on giving our primary care workforce the numbers and support they need, so that when you or your whānau need to see a GP, you can—without facing weeks-long wait times or closed books.Strengthening urgent and after-hours care will also be a focus of mine as part of our plan to enable faster access to primary care, and work on this is underway.This week I also announced that Health New Zealand has agreed to deliver a $285 million uplift to funding over three years for general practice from 1 July, in addition to the capitation uplift general practice receives annually.This will be incentivise GPs to improve access and patient outcomes – especially around improved vaccination rates and supporting family doctors to undertake minor planned services. This is just the start – there is more to do. Health New Zealand has work underway to rethink how we fund primary care to make it faster, more accessible, and more sustainable. 

    3. Reducing ED wait times
    My third priority is emergency departments, which have seen lengthy wait times continue to increase since targets were scrapped. The ED target is not just about making sure patients are seen quickly but it pushes every part of the hospital to work smoothly.Emergency departments are the beating hearts of hospitals – if they are operating efficiently and effectively, that reflects the effectiveness and efficiency of every part of the hospital. If wait times are too slow in the ED department it indicates problems throughout the hospital. I expect Health New Zealand to: 

    Empower clinicians at local levels to fix bottlenecks in real time.
    Integrate the primary care reforms, so fewer preventable cases end up in ED. This will be done by hiring and training more doctors and nurses and ensuring New Zealanders have access to round-the-clock care.

    The relationship between our hospitals and primary care is critically important, but has broken down in recent years and needs to be fixed. Empowering the primary care sector can help keep people out of hospital and manage patients much more cost effectively in our communities.We need our hospitals working with our primary health care providers to achieve this, and we need many more hospital services delivered locally in communities rather than centrally in our hospitals. We are restoring a focus on ED shorter stay targets, forcing real improvements across the entire hospital. We want to see 95 percent of people admitted, discharged, or transferred from an emergency department within six hours. 

    4. Clearing the elective surgery backlog
    My fourth priority is elective surgeries, where 27,497 people were waiting more than four months for surgeries they desperately needed in September 2023—a number that was 1,037 under National in 2017. This backlog is unacceptable and has unfortunately grown since we came to Government.But we have arrested the decline in the number of operations. As I mentioned earlier, last financial year, the health system carried out 10,000 more elective procedures than in the previous 12 months. However, we must still urgently increase the volume of surgeries.The elective surgery wait list target isn’t just about measuring performance of the system, it is about people. Behind every number is an individual, a family, many waiting in pain and families anxious for their loved ones to have the surgery they need. We can’t keep doing things the way we currently do it. At the moment Health NZ undertakes both elective surgery, and also responds to acute need, with planned elective surgery often being disrupted by acute need, leaving patients waiting for treatment and waitlists continuing to grow. At the same time, the small amount of planned care that is outsourced to the private sector is often done on an ad hoc basis, meaning Health New Zealand is paying premium prices.This practice must stop. Kiwis waiting in pain for an operation aren’t worried about who is delivering the operation, they just want it done as quickly as possible. I want to see Health NZ both lifting its own performance on elective surgeries, but also partnering closely with the private sector to ensure we can get on top of the waitlists and get kiwis the operations they need as quickly as possible. By partnering with the private sector, we can ensure people get the care they need, and Health New Zealand can achieve value for money through long-term contracts with the private sector. I expect Health New Zealand to work closely with ACC – which already has many of these arrangements in place – to ensure value for money for taxpayers and faster treatment for patients.Today I am pleased to announce the first part of this plan with Health New Zealand investing $50 million between now and the end of June this year to reduce the backlog of people waiting for elective surgeries. That will see an extra 10,579 procedures carried out between now and the middle of this year, with work also underway now to negotiate longer term agreements. This will improve the quality of life of thousands of New Zealanders. It will mean people can return to work, take up hobbies again, and continue to build precious memories with loved ones. I can also announce that I have asked Health New Zealand to work with the private sector to agree a set of principles that will underpin future outsourcing contracts. This will include: 
     

    Ending the use of expensive ad hoc, shorter-term contracts for elective surgeries. 
    Negotiating longer-term, multi-year agreements to deliver better value for money and better outcomes for patients. 
    Agreeing on plans to recruit, share, and train staff which already bridge both the public and private hospitals. 

     
    Long term, I want as much planned care as possible to be delivered in partnership with the private sector, freeing public hospitals for acute needs. However, this needs to be done in a way which is mutually beneficial for our public health system and our workforce. To be clear, the system remains publicly funded, so everyone has access, but this will allow Health New Zealand to leverage private capacity to reduce wait times for patients. 
     
    5. Investing in health infrastructure – building for the future
    My fifth priority is infrastructure—physical and digital. Our hospitals and data systems are in dire need of upgrade. Health New Zealand is grappling with an outdated infrastructure that is inhibiting changes to models of care that improve patient outcomes and drive efficiencies.Currently: 

    Health New Zealand has about 1,200 buildings – some have significant seismic risks, other older buildings are not clinically fit for purpose. 
    Digital infrastructure is also fragmented. There are an estimated 6,000 applications and 100 digital networks. That equates to roughly one application for every 16 Health New Zealand staff members, which is unsustainable.

    We need solutions. That includes: 

    Investigating creating a separate Health Infrastructure Entity under Health New Zealand, to manage and deliver physical and digital assets. 
    Publishing a long-term plan for health infrastructure so Kiwis know what’s being upgraded across New Zealand and can see a 10-year pipeline of capital projects 
    Putting all funding and financing options on the table—this will require bold, sustainable investment.  

    Health infrastructure has been neglected for decades.We’re turning that around. There are currently health infrastructure projects, worth a cumulative $6.3 billion in the pipeline.That includes:
     

    A new hospital in Dunedin. 
    Modern cancer treatment facilities in Hawke’s Bay and Taranaki 
    The extensive facilities infrastructure remediation programme at Auckland City Hospital and Greenlane Clinical Centre, and 
    Manukau Health Park and Hillmorton specialist mental health services in Christchurch. 

    Hospitals don’t run on press releases; they run on real investment. We are delivering that. 
     
    Stripping out bureaucracy, demanding delivery
    At the end of the day, you can’t manage what you don’t measure. It comes down to results, accountabilities, and every single person in the health system playing their part. My message to Health New Zealand is simple: I expect delivery. I expect a back-to-basics approach, with less talk and more action.I expect a relentless focus on improving health outcomes for New Zealanders and for Health New Zealand to reallocate baseline funding to implement immediate action.We’ve had enough talk. It’s time to fix this system.
     
    A health system that delivers for every New Zealander
    New Zealanders don’t want more reports or more excuses—they want action: 

    Health targets are back.
    We’re taking action to stabilise surgery waitlists.
    More doctors and nurses are being trained and recruited.
    Hospitals are being upgraded.
    Primary care is being strengthened.

     
    This isn’t just talk; it’s real change. And I promise every New Zealander: we will not stop until our health system delivers timely, quality care to all.We are embarking on this shift with urgency.Patients come first. And this Government will not rest until that’s a reality.Thank you very much.

    MIL OSI New Zealand News

  • MIL-OSI Video: RBNZ 35 years of flexible inflation targeting conference: Session 1 – The Big Picture

    Source: Reserve Bank of New Zealand (video statements)

    Just do IT? An assessment of inflation targeting in a global comparative case study (02:01) – Roberto Duncan, Ohio University; Enrique Martínez García, Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas; Patricia Toledo, Ohio University.

    Central bank reviews (43:59) – Renee Fry-McKibbin, Australian National University; Hans Genberg, Asia School of Business; Özer Karagedikli, Asia School of Business; Warwick McKibbin, Australian National University; Tara Sinclair, George Washington University

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OjcfdqpxQas

    MIL OSI Video

  • MIL-OSI Australia: 3AW Drive, Melbourne

    Source: Australian Ministers for Regional Development

    JACQUI FELGATE [HOST]: We do speak a lot on this program about infrastructure spending in Victoria, so I do very much appreciate the time of the Infrastructure Minister, Catherine King. Good afternoon to you.

    CATHERINE KING [MINISTER]: Hi, Jacqui. Lovely to be with you.

    JACQUI FELGATE: Now, you’ve just announced, and I began the program by speaking about this, the $1.1 billion to revamp and fix up the Western Freeway. It is between Melton and Caroline Springs. But can I ask you, why now, given that this road – and we take call after call on the dangerous nature of this road – why now? Why not a year ago? Why not two years ago?

    CATHERINE KING: Yeah. So, the Western Highway’s been a long term project. I’ve been living, obviously, in the west of the state for a long time so I well remember many of the projects we’ve had to do the work on, whether it’s Anthony’s Cutting, the Deer Park Bypass, the duplication beyond Ballarat – we’ve still got work to do all the way up to Stawell. But what we’ve seen has been significant housing growth along that, sort, of Caroline Springs, Rockbank, between Melton and Bacchus Marsh corridor, and the traffic has really been building up over time. 

    So, just before the last election we announced we’d partner with Victorian State Government to do a business case to try and work out what are the alternatives, what can you actually do? The work that’s being done, obviously on the West Gate Tunnel, will improve things down that end so you’ve got traffic can flow through. But really, how do we manage these new housing estates? 

    Business case got handed to the Victorian Government just at the end of last year and so we’ve been working with them on, well, now what do we need to actually fund? And that’s why the announcement is happening today of the $1.1 billion.

    JACQUI FELGATE: Would you consider the road to be in acceptable condition, especially given you drive down it? What do you think when you drive along it?

    CATHERINE KING: Yeah. So, I think from a safety- you know, there’s good safety from, sort of, a barrier perspective. But when you hit- if you’re travelling really early in the morning I hit normally what should be an hour and 20-minute trip into town is nowhere near that. You end up getting caught when you hit Bacchus Marsh – the tailback now from those big housing estates, particularly as we get a lot of tradies coming on at 6:00am in the morning. So, from 6:00 to about 9:30 it really is quite congested, and then the reverse coming home. There’ll be people stuck in traffic now trying to get on those Melton on ramps, really, it tails back there as well. 

    It’s also pretty narrow. And also then in terms of some of the surface work, we’ve seen some work being done, which is about containing the road.

    JACQUI FELGATE: [Talks over] Is that- you mean potholes there.

    CATHERINE KING: Yeah.

    JACQUI FELGATE: So, what are the potholes like on the road?

    CATHERINE KING: They’ve got better but there’s been a lot of work done. And again, one of the things I’ve been pointing out, which shocked me a fair bit, was the previous government had frozen maintenance money from the Federal Government…

    JACQUI FELGATE: [Interrupts] We can’t keep blaming the previous government, though, Catherine.

    CATHERINE KING: [Indistinct]…

    JACQUI FELGATE: It’s banned on this program.

    CATHERINE KING: That’s why I’ve fixed it. So I will say, I’ve taken responsibility now. We’re in government and so we’ve fixed that and put more maintenance money in. But what this does, it does a few things. So, the business case has come up with a whole range of options, whether they’re from widening at some areas, whether it’s into better interchanges, whether it’s diamond interchanges, it’s come up with a range of options. 

    Now we’ve put the money on the table it allows the Victorian Government to go, okay, which project do we need to do first? Where are we going to go with this money particularly to really get that Caroline Springs to Melton area as resolved as we possibly can, because it’s just had such huge growth. So, that’s what’s happened today.

    JACQUI FELGATE: There is understandable frustration amongst the community, particularly from those in Victoria in the West, and some critics, myself included, would say that this is, basically, pork barrelling. Only now does the seat of Hawke and all of those seats that are now potentially going to swing the other way – only now do you come up with the money, because you’re in danger of losing those traditional Labor voters in the west.

    CATHERINE KING: Well, that’s a comment. And what I’d say is that we’ve recognised there’s a problem. We’ve been in government just on three years, or just under three years. Business case got handed to us at the end of last year, now’s the time to say, well, now how do we actually then work out what- we’ve actually worked out what we need to do to fix it, now we’re committing the money. 

    What I would point out is it’s been Labor Governments consistently that has invested in the Western Highway. As I’ve said, I’ve lived down here for a long time and I’ve seen Labor Governments and I advocated I remember when Martin Ferguson was minister, to actually get Anthony’s Cutting done and the Deer Park Bypass funded. The duplication of the road as well, again, that’s been really strong advocacy by Labor Governments to get this done. And really, that’s what the investment is about today.

    JACQUI FELGATE: Political support, both at a Federal and State Labor level has sunk over the past 18 months. You know, how worried are you that Victoria is going to be the state that becomes the battleground state this election?

    CATHERINE KING: Well, my job as Infrastructure Minister is to look after the whole of the country, and Victoria is no different. I am investing in the East, I’m investing in the North, the South and the West to make sure that Victoria has the infrastructure it needs. 

    When we came to office the spend for infrastructure for the Commonwealth Government to Victoria was $17 billion. It is much higher in other states. We’ve managed, in the three years we’ve been up to- in office, to get it up to $24 billion with these announcements certainly finishing today, and that’s been really important. Because Victoria, frankly, has pretty much for the last decade had to go on its own when it came to infrastructure building. And really, that wasn’t good enough, and that’s what we’ve tried to do. 

    So, everywhere matters to me, every community, every suburb. I grew up in the east of the state, spent most of the first half of my life there. I’ve seen huge growth there, and I now live in the west of the state. Everywhere matters to us.

    JACQUI FELGATE: And just on Sunshine. Speaking of the West, you would have seen the reports about the station up to $4 billion. Like, how can you spend $4 billion on a train station? It doesn’t…

    CATHERINE KING: Yeah, well, infrastructure. Infrastructure is really expensive. I wish it wasn’t. I wish was not expensive to build.

    JACQUI FELGATE: [Talks over] Is government infrastructure more expensive than private infrastructure?

    CATHERINE KING: No, it’s just the cost. It’s really- like, we’ve seen labour costs, the cost of steel, the cost of cement, the amount of time it takes for engineering, there’s shortages of labour, all of that. It is just really costly and it’s like that all around the country. So, I get- I got asked a very similar question in Queensland: why is it more expensive in Queensland to build. Well, you know, it’s not. It’s expensive everywhere. 

    So, what’s- the station is actually a really big project and it’s quite a few things. So, one of the things it does is it creates an entire new set of lines so that you’ve got- you separate completely the country trains out, and so that’s a big piece of infrastructure. You think about, we’re building Southern Cross, we’re literally building Southern Cross at Sunshine Station. It’s a big project, so it will cost lots of money.

    JACQUI FELGATE: Okay. I guess the frustration of people though is that government projects, whether they be federal or state and whether they be a Liberal or Labor project, they always blow out and they never finish on time. Certainly that is the experience in Victoria at the moment.

    CATHERINE KING: Well, one of the things we’ve been trying to do and it’s why I’ve had a lot of work done to reform Infrastructure Australia and also reform the way I make decisions about what we invest in, so you often see me announce, and sometimes people criticise me for this, but you often see me announce planning money first. And everyone goes, well, why are you doing that? Why don’t you just build it? The reason I invest planning money first is because I want to know how much is this going to cost? Can we do the geotechnical work, you know, dig in the ground first, find out whether there’s hard rock there, what is there, and then actually get a much better understanding of the costs.

    The other- and do that first before we commit construction money. So often, I will do that first and do that business planning work, which is what we’ve done with Western Highway. I’ve done that planning first. Everyone would have liked me three years ago just to fix the road but I wanted to know. I’m not an engineer. I need expert advice to tell me what are the treatments we need to do to actually fix this rather than just making the problem worse, which we sometimes can do when we put new lanes in, it just makes [indistinct]-

    JACQUI FELGATE: [Interrupts] What problems have we made worse?

    CATHERINE KING: Yeah. So, sometimes what happens when you actually say, okay, I’ll widen the lane, here, I’ll widen this road, it then narrows further down, it just moves the problem further down. So, some of the congestion busting that we saw in past years hasn’t always fixed the problem of actually getting congestion moving, or you just see new, more housing developments keep growing out. So, you’ve got to really think about how you do the planning work and then actually making sure you deliver the construction. And that’s what we’ve tried to do and tried to reform and working really closely with states. 

    States are now required to give me a 10-year pipeline of the projects that they think they’re going to need so that we’ve got a line of sight of where those investments need to be made. And we’ve worked really hard to try and make sure we build in things like more apprentices, more training, more of that staff.

    JACQUI FELGATE: [Interrupts] Yes. And speaking- can I just ask speaking, because I know I’ve only got you for a certain amount of time?

    CATHERINE KING: That’s all right.

    JACQUI FELGATE: But just on suburban rail and that 10-year pipeline, is that still a priority for you? And can you afford to do both airport rail and the first stage of suburban rail between Cheltenham and Box Hill? Do you have enough money?

    CATHERINE KING: Yeah. So, Suburban Rail Loop East is under construction now. We’ve put $2.2 billion in that. Infrastructure Australia has assessed that project for me which has allowed me to release that $2.2 billion. We’ll assess further requests as they come forward, they’ll need to go through Infrastructure Australia as well. 

    But what we’ve said, and the Prime Minister announced recently, is that we also think that that will go under construction, Victorian State Government has entered into contracts and it’s doing that. We also think that the airport rail, it is time that we actually got this off the books. We’ve had, both of us, have had $10 billion sitting on the table, literally not productively being used and we want to actually get this project done. So, we’ve now unlocked that by putting the extra $2 billion into Sunshine Precinct. We’ve been working really constructively with the airport and that’s been a bit of a deadlock between the three parties. And we’ve got- we’ll have a bit more to say about that shortly.

    JACQUI FELGATE: You talk about contracts. You mentioned the word that the state government had allocated contracts for Suburban Rail Loop, and then you just previously spoke to me about the importance of planning and the importance of allocating money where it should go in the right way. Given that the state government has already allocated contracts going forward that you are yet to put funding in, can you guarantee, like, are you still going to fund what has been contracted? Because the state government can’t do it all on their own.

    CATHERINE KING: Well I mean, Suburban Rail Loop East, we’ve been pretty clear. The commitment we made was to deliver $2.2 billion to that project, and we have now done that. Any further requests will need to be assessed by Infrastructure Australia, and that really is- I’ve been pretty firm about that. But obviously, the Victorian State Government is progressing that project, early works have been done. The tunnel boring machines, you’ll start to see those, I think, later this year, that’s been committed to. And we will consider further requests as they come in. 

    JACQUI FELGATE: Do you like that project, the Suburban Rail Loop? 

    CATHERINE KING: Yeah. Well, I grew up in the East. I grew up catching the train from Syndal Station into the city. Glen Waverley, that was my stomping ground from all my teenage years to my 20s, and I can absolutely recognise how difficult it is to get across and then what you’re trying to do at Monash, so trying to actually get public transport to Monash.

    JACQUI FELGATE: [Talks over] So, have you driven a lot from Cheltenham to Box Hill? 

    CATHERINE KING: Yeah, I have done, to be honest, on occasion. And then I was trying to get, because I grew up in Syndal, from Syndal to Monash and through there was always really difficult. But the other thing it unlocks is, if you live down Gippsland Way and you need to get your kid to the Children’s Hospital at Monash or you’re going to university, it also unlocks that. So, it’s actually got some really terrific benefits. 

    It’s also about building. If you look over- if anyone’s been over to WA, they’ve built this unbelievably huge Melbourne metro system which is unlocking new housing, new suburbs, new industrial precincts, and that’s what they’ve done there in recognition of the growth that is occurring. And so, that’s really what suburban rail sort of does. It provides that loop and that housing. 

    So, I think it’s a really- it’s seen as a necessary project. Infrastructure Australia says it’s an important project for the state. But there’s a little bit more work the state needs to do around the value capture proposition to convince Infrastructure Australia about where, how the money and the funding is all going to work together, and they’ll do that work over the course of the next year or so. 

    JACQUI FELGATE: One would hope. Catherine King is the Infrastructure Minister. Always appreciate your time.

    CATHERINE KING: Always happy to be with you. 

    JACQUI FELGATE: Thank you.

     

     

     

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Judge freezes company bank accounts in lawsuit over “probates for profit” scheme at AG Brown’s request

    Source: Washington State News

    Millions of dollars unaccounted for, ringleader currently at-large

    SEATTLE — In a consumer protection lawsuit filed in King County Superior Court, the Attorney General’s office asserts that seven Washingtonians and their five companies manipulated the probate system to gain control over hundreds of deceased strangers’ estates. They walked away with millions of dollars that should have gone to heirs. The complaint asserts that the defendants violated Washington’s Consumer Protection Act as well as state probate, estate and escrow laws.

    “Probate is a solemn legal process that ensures heirs receive their share of an estate after a loved one dies,” said Nick Brown, Washington State Attorney General. “These defendants exploited loopholes, and our consumer protection team will hold them accountable for the harms caused to multiple families.”

    At the Attorney General’s request, a judge froze dozens of the defendant’s bank accounts to prevent additional losses.

    The Attorney General’s investigation determined that the defendants filed more than 200 probates across the state over the last five years, selling at least 90 homes collectively worth more than $28 million. Large sums of money have gone missing, and the defendants have refused to say where the money is.

    The lawsuit seeks penalties for each violation of the Consumer Protection Act for the group’s deceptive and unfair acts, and full restitution for heirs affected by the “probates for profit” scheme. The lawsuit also asks the court to permanently stop the individuals and the companies from breaking the law in the future.

    The Consumer Protection Division is largely funded through money recovered from businesses who have violated Washington’s Consumer Protection Act and similar laws, not by taxpayers. Specifically, a portion of Consumer Protection recoveries go into the Attorney General’s Civil Justice Operating Fund, which supports the Consumer Protection, Antitrust, Wing Luke Civil Rights, and Environmental Protection divisions. It also directly funds Medicaid Fraud Control and the Complex Litigation divisions.

    Assistant Attorneys General Matt Geyman, Ben Carr and Lauren Holzer and Paralegals Miranda Marti and Christopher Kiefer are handling the case for the Attorney General’s Office.

    -30-

     

    Washington’s Attorney General serves the people and the State of Washington. As the state’s largest law firm, the Attorney General’s Office provides legal representation to every state agency, board, and commission in Washington. Additionally, the Office serves the people directly by enforcing consumer protection, civil rights, and environmental protection laws. The Office also prosecutes elder abuse, Medicaid fraud, and handles sexually violent predator cases in 38 of Washington’s 39 counties. Visit www.atg.wa.gov to learn more.

    Media Contact:

    Email: press@atg.wa.gov

    Phone: (360) 753-2727

    General contacts: Click here

    Media Resource Guide & Attorney General’s Office FAQ

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Governor Stein Issues Reminder About Upcoming Federal Deadlines For Hurricane Helene Support

    Source: US State of North Carolina

    Headline: Governor Stein Issues Reminder About Upcoming Federal Deadlines For Hurricane Helene Support

    Governor Stein Issues Reminder About Upcoming Federal Deadlines For Hurricane Helene Support
    lsaito

    Raleigh, NC

    To make sure North Carolinians have the resources they need to recover, Governor Josh Stein is encouraging anyone affected by Hurricane Helene to be aware of the upcoming application deadlines for federal support, including for individuals and small businesses.

    “As folks across western North Carolina continue to rebuild their lives and businesses after Hurricane Helene, it’s important to know what resources are available to support recovery,” said Governor Josh Stein. “Thousands of western North Carolinians have already taken advantage of these federal resources, but there is still time to apply. I encourage everyone to get the assistance they need from these programs.”

    Relevant deadlines:

    • March 8, 2025: FEMA Individual Assistance deadline for disaster survivors affected by Tropical Storm Helene. Survivors should apply for FEMA assistance online at disasterassistance.gov, by calling 1-800-621-3362, or by downloading the FEMA app. Available assistance may include funding for housing solutions, reimbursement for hotel costs, funds for repairs to your primary residence and privately-owned access routes, and reimbursement for disaster-causes expenses.
    • March 10, 2025: The deadline to apply for Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA) has been extended to March 10, 2025, for people in 39 North Carolina counties and for the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians of North Carolina. This extension maintains consistency with the deadlines set by the Federal Emergency Management Agency and allows the Division of Employment Security to continue to provide temporary financial support to people impacted by Hurricane Helene. Visit: des.nc.gov/dua; for English, call 919-629-3857 or Spanish 919-276-5698, Monday – Friday 8 a.m. – 5 p.m.
    • March 29, 2025: DUA expiration date (last date for benefits to be paid). Visit: des.nc.gov/dua; for English, call 919-629-3857 or Spanish 919-276-5698, Monday – Friday 8 a.m. – 5 p.m.
    • April 27, 2025: The U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) is extending the physical damage loan deadline for disaster declarations affected by the 2024 federal funding lapse. Applicants may also call the SBA’s Customer Service Center at (800) 659-2955 or send an email to disastercustomerservice@sba.gov for more information on SBA disaster assistance. For people who are deaf, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability, please dial 7-1-1 to access telecommunications relay services. Disaster assistance | U.S. Small Business Administration
    • June 30, 2025: The U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) filing deadline to return economic injury applications is June 30, 2025. Applicants may also call the SBA’s Customer Service Center at (800) 659-2955 or send an email to disastercustomerservice@sba.gov for more information on SBA disaster assistance. For people who are deaf, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability, please dial 7-1-1 to access telecommunications relay services. Disaster assistance | U.S. Small Business Administration

    To apply, please visit a Disaster Recovery Center (DRC) to find the center location nearest you, fema.gov/drc. You can also go online to DisasterAssistance.gov., download the FEMA App for mobile devices., or call the FEMA helpline at 800-621-3362 between 7 a.m. and midnight.  

    Mar 6, 2025

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Security: New Hampshire Man Sentenced for Conspiring to Sell Stolen Government Property

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

    Christopher Hagan, formerly of North Berwick, received items from an employee of a national defense contractor and employees of the Defense Logistics Agency

    PORTLAND, Maine:  A New Hampshire man was sentenced today in U.S. District Court in Portland for conspiring to transport stolen property in interstate commerce and conspiring to sell stolen government property. 

    U.S. District Judge John A. Woodcock, Jr. sentenced Christopher Hagan, 33, to 12 months plus one day in prison to be followed by three years of supervised release. He was also fined $10,000, ordered to forfeit $150,000, and will be required to refile his tax returns for five years. Hagan pleaded guilty on May 13, 2024.

    According to court records, between October 2017 and September 2021, Hagan obtained stolen government items which he resold on online forums. One of Hagan’s coconspirators, Jonathan Chaisson, 34, of New Hampshire was employed by a national defense contractor based in New Hampshire and received used and/or broken Advance Target Pointer Illuminator Aiming Laser (ATPIAL) devices designated for military and law enforcement use. Chaisson stole or converted new and used parts and components to repair the ATPIALs and provided Hagan with the repaired devices to sell.

    Hagan also conspired with Wade Walker, 45, and Michael Humphrey, 46, both of Texas, to steal and sell military equipment from the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA), an agency of the United States Department of Defense. Both Walker and Humphrey were employed by the DLA Red River Army Depot facility in Texarkana, Texas. On multiple dates in 2019 and in 2020, Humphrey transferred stolen government property to Walker for resale, and Walker provided the stolen property to Hagan for further resale. Through the investigation, agents determined that Hagan had at least one customer in China.

    On July 24, 2023, Chaisson pleaded guilty to conspiring to transport stolen property in interstate commerce and was sentenced to probation for two years. On October 31, 2023, Humphrey pleaded guilty to conspiring to sell stolen government property and was sentenced to probation for two years. On January 8, 2024, Walker pleaded guilty to conspiring to sell stolen government property and was sentenced to probation for three years.

    The United States Department of Commerce – Office of Export Enforcement and the Defense Criminal Investigative Service investigated the case with assistance from Homeland Security Investigations (HSI).

    “That Mr. Hagan and his conspirators would exploit their connections to the defense industry to put their own financial gain ahead of the nation’s security is unconscionable,” said Acting U.S. Attorney Craig M. Wolff. “The U.S. Attorney’s Office commends the remarkable interagency cooperation that underpinned this complex and important investigation.”

    “The Defense Criminal Investigative Service (DCIS), the law enforcement arm of the Department of Defense (DoD) Office of Inspector General, is fully committed to protecting the integrity of the DoD supply chain,” said Patrick J. Hegarty, Special Agent in Charge of the DCIS Northeast Field Office. “Profiting from the sale of stolen DoD property undermines the mission of the Defense Logistics Agency and negatively impacts our military members. This investigation demonstrates DCIS’ commitment to work with our law enforcement partners and the Department of Justice to hold accountable those who harm the DoD.”

    “By stealing sensitive military technology and selling it to China, Christopher Hagan along with those he conspired with, prioritized greed and personal gain over U.S. national security,” said Special Agent in Charge James Guanci, U.S. Department of Commerce, Office of Export Enforcement, Boston Field Office. “This case serves as a strong reminder that those who betray the trust of the American people will be held accountable.”

    ###

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Security: Michigan Man Pleads Guilty to Conspiracy in $14.5 Million PPP Loan Fraud

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

    PITTSBURGH, Pa.- A resident of Detroit, Michigan, pleaded guilty in federal court to a charge of fraud conspiracy, Acting United States Attorney Troy Rivetti announced today.

    Marc Andrew Martin, 46, pleaded guilty to one count before United States District Judge W. Scott Hardy.

    In connection with the guilty plea, the Court was advised that, between March 2020 and August 2021, Martin and others—including Matthew Parker—conspired to defraud lenders of over $14 million in Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) COVID-19 relief loans. Parker, a licensed CPA from Detroit, Michigan, recruited hundreds of small businesses in Pittsburgh and Detroit and falsified PPP loan applications. The Small Business Administration approved 226 of those applications, resulting in loans totaling approximately $14.5 million to businesses, the largest known PPP fraud in the Western District of Pennsylvania. Martin referred approximately $1,900,000 in fraudulent loan packages to Parker. Parker pleaded guilty to fraud conspiracy in May 2024.

    Judge Hardy scheduled sentencing for July 10, 2025. The law provides for a total sentence of up to 30 years in prison, a fine of up to $1 million, or both. Under the federal Sentencing Guidelines, the actual sentence imposed is based upon the seriousness of the offense and the prior criminal history, if any, of the defendant.

    Assistant United States Attorney Gregory C. Melucci is prosecuting this case on behalf of the government.

    The Federal Bureau of Investigation conducted the investigation that led to the prosecution of Martin.

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Australian Deputy PM: 3AW Drive, Melbourne

    Source: Minister of Infrastructure

    JACQUI FELGATE [HOST]: We do speak a lot on this program about infrastructure spending in Victoria, so I do very much appreciate the time of the Infrastructure Minister, Catherine King. Good afternoon to you.

    CATHERINE KING [MINISTER]: Hi, Jacqui. Lovely to be with you.

    JACQUI FELGATE: Now, you’ve just announced, and I began the program by speaking about this, the $1.1 billion to revamp and fix up the Western Freeway. It is between Melton and Caroline Springs. But can I ask you, why now, given that this road – and we take call after call on the dangerous nature of this road – why now? Why not a year ago? Why not two years ago?

    CATHERINE KING: Yeah. So, the Western Highway’s been a long term project. I’ve been living, obviously, in the west of the state for a long time so I well remember many of the projects we’ve had to do the work on, whether it’s Anthony’s Cutting, the Deer Park Bypass, the duplication beyond Ballarat – we’ve still got work to do all the way up to Stawell. But what we’ve seen has been significant housing growth along that, sort, of Caroline Springs, Rockbank, between Melton and Bacchus Marsh corridor, and the traffic has really been building up over time. 

    So, just before the last election we announced we’d partner with Victorian State Government to do a business case to try and work out what are the alternatives, what can you actually do? The work that’s being done, obviously on the West Gate Tunnel, will improve things down that end so you’ve got traffic can flow through. But really, how do we manage these new housing estates? 

    Business case got handed to the Victorian Government just at the end of last year and so we’ve been working with them on, well, now what do we need to actually fund? And that’s why the announcement is happening today of the $1.1 billion.

    JACQUI FELGATE: Would you consider the road to be in acceptable condition, especially given you drive down it? What do you think when you drive along it?

    CATHERINE KING: Yeah. So, I think from a safety- you know, there’s good safety from, sort of, a barrier perspective. But when you hit- if you’re travelling really early in the morning I hit normally what should be an hour and 20-minute trip into town is nowhere near that. You end up getting caught when you hit Bacchus Marsh – the tailback now from those big housing estates, particularly as we get a lot of tradies coming on at 6:00am in the morning. So, from 6:00 to about 9:30 it really is quite congested, and then the reverse coming home. There’ll be people stuck in traffic now trying to get on those Melton on ramps, really, it tails back there as well. 

    It’s also pretty narrow. And also then in terms of some of the surface work, we’ve seen some work being done, which is about containing the road.

    JACQUI FELGATE: [Talks over] Is that- you mean potholes there.

    CATHERINE KING: Yeah.

    JACQUI FELGATE: So, what are the potholes like on the road?

    CATHERINE KING: They’ve got better but there’s been a lot of work done. And again, one of the things I’ve been pointing out, which shocked me a fair bit, was the previous government had frozen maintenance money from the Federal Government…

    JACQUI FELGATE: [Interrupts] We can’t keep blaming the previous government, though, Catherine.

    CATHERINE KING: [Indistinct]…

    JACQUI FELGATE: It’s banned on this program.

    CATHERINE KING: That’s why I’ve fixed it. So I will say, I’ve taken responsibility now. We’re in government and so we’ve fixed that and put more maintenance money in. But what this does, it does a few things. So, the business case has come up with a whole range of options, whether they’re from widening at some areas, whether it’s into better interchanges, whether it’s diamond interchanges, it’s come up with a range of options. 

    Now we’ve put the money on the table it allows the Victorian Government to go, okay, which project do we need to do first? Where are we going to go with this money particularly to really get that Caroline Springs to Melton area as resolved as we possibly can, because it’s just had such huge growth. So, that’s what’s happened today.

    JACQUI FELGATE: There is understandable frustration amongst the community, particularly from those in Victoria in the West, and some critics, myself included, would say that this is, basically, pork barrelling. Only now does the seat of Hawke and all of those seats that are now potentially going to swing the other way – only now do you come up with the money, because you’re in danger of losing those traditional Labor voters in the west.

    CATHERINE KING: Well, that’s a comment. And what I’d say is that we’ve recognised there’s a problem. We’ve been in government just on three years, or just under three years. Business case got handed to us at the end of last year, now’s the time to say, well, now how do we actually then work out what- we’ve actually worked out what we need to do to fix it, now we’re committing the money. 

    What I would point out is it’s been Labor Governments consistently that has invested in the Western Highway. As I’ve said, I’ve lived down here for a long time and I’ve seen Labor Governments and I advocated I remember when Martin Ferguson was minister, to actually get Anthony’s Cutting done and the Deer Park Bypass funded. The duplication of the road as well, again, that’s been really strong advocacy by Labor Governments to get this done. And really, that’s what the investment is about today.

    JACQUI FELGATE: Political support, both at a Federal and State Labor level has sunk over the past 18 months. You know, how worried are you that Victoria is going to be the state that becomes the battleground state this election?

    CATHERINE KING: Well, my job as Infrastructure Minister is to look after the whole of the country, and Victoria is no different. I am investing in the East, I’m investing in the North, the South and the West to make sure that Victoria has the infrastructure it needs. 

    When we came to office the spend for infrastructure for the Commonwealth Government to Victoria was $17 billion. It is much higher in other states. We’ve managed, in the three years we’ve been up to- in office, to get it up to $24 billion with these announcements certainly finishing today, and that’s been really important. Because Victoria, frankly, has pretty much for the last decade had to go on its own when it came to infrastructure building. And really, that wasn’t good enough, and that’s what we’ve tried to do. 

    So, everywhere matters to me, every community, every suburb. I grew up in the east of the state, spent most of the first half of my life there. I’ve seen huge growth there, and I now live in the west of the state. Everywhere matters to us.

    JACQUI FELGATE: And just on Sunshine. Speaking of the West, you would have seen the reports about the station up to $4 billion. Like, how can you spend $4 billion on a train station? It doesn’t…

    CATHERINE KING: Yeah, well, infrastructure. Infrastructure is really expensive. I wish it wasn’t. I wish was not expensive to build.

    JACQUI FELGATE: [Talks over] Is government infrastructure more expensive than private infrastructure?

    CATHERINE KING: No, it’s just the cost. It’s really- like, we’ve seen labour costs, the cost of steel, the cost of cement, the amount of time it takes for engineering, there’s shortages of labour, all of that. It is just really costly and it’s like that all around the country. So, I get- I got asked a very similar question in Queensland: why is it more expensive in Queensland to build. Well, you know, it’s not. It’s expensive everywhere. 

    So, what’s- the station is actually a really big project and it’s quite a few things. So, one of the things it does is it creates an entire new set of lines so that you’ve got- you separate completely the country trains out, and so that’s a big piece of infrastructure. You think about, we’re building Southern Cross, we’re literally building Southern Cross at Sunshine Station. It’s a big project, so it will cost lots of money.

    JACQUI FELGATE: Okay. I guess the frustration of people though is that government projects, whether they be federal or state and whether they be a Liberal or Labor project, they always blow out and they never finish on time. Certainly that is the experience in Victoria at the moment.

    CATHERINE KING: Well, one of the things we’ve been trying to do and it’s why I’ve had a lot of work done to reform Infrastructure Australia and also reform the way I make decisions about what we invest in, so you often see me announce, and sometimes people criticise me for this, but you often see me announce planning money first. And everyone goes, well, why are you doing that? Why don’t you just build it? The reason I invest planning money first is because I want to know how much is this going to cost? Can we do the geotechnical work, you know, dig in the ground first, find out whether there’s hard rock there, what is there, and then actually get a much better understanding of the costs.

    The other- and do that first before we commit construction money. So often, I will do that first and do that business planning work, which is what we’ve done with Western Highway. I’ve done that planning first. Everyone would have liked me three years ago just to fix the road but I wanted to know. I’m not an engineer. I need expert advice to tell me what are the treatments we need to do to actually fix this rather than just making the problem worse, which we sometimes can do when we put new lanes in, it just makes [indistinct]-

    JACQUI FELGATE: [Interrupts] What problems have we made worse?

    CATHERINE KING: Yeah. So, sometimes what happens when you actually say, okay, I’ll widen the lane, here, I’ll widen this road, it then narrows further down, it just moves the problem further down. So, some of the congestion busting that we saw in past years hasn’t always fixed the problem of actually getting congestion moving, or you just see new, more housing developments keep growing out. So, you’ve got to really think about how you do the planning work and then actually making sure you deliver the construction. And that’s what we’ve tried to do and tried to reform and working really closely with states. 

    States are now required to give me a 10-year pipeline of the projects that they think they’re going to need so that we’ve got a line of sight of where those investments need to be made. And we’ve worked really hard to try and make sure we build in things like more apprentices, more training, more of that staff.

    JACQUI FELGATE: [Interrupts] Yes. And speaking- can I just ask speaking, because I know I’ve only got you for a certain amount of time?

    CATHERINE KING: That’s all right.

    JACQUI FELGATE: But just on suburban rail and that 10-year pipeline, is that still a priority for you? And can you afford to do both airport rail and the first stage of suburban rail between Cheltenham and Box Hill? Do you have enough money?

    CATHERINE KING: Yeah. So, Suburban Rail Loop East is under construction now. We’ve put $2.2 billion in that. Infrastructure Australia has assessed that project for me which has allowed me to release that $2.2 billion. We’ll assess further requests as they come forward, they’ll need to go through Infrastructure Australia as well. 

    But what we’ve said, and the Prime Minister announced recently, is that we also think that that will go under construction, Victorian State Government has entered into contracts and it’s doing that. We also think that the airport rail, it is time that we actually got this off the books. We’ve had, both of us, have had $10 billion sitting on the table, literally not productively being used and we want to actually get this project done. So, we’ve now unlocked that by putting the extra $2 billion into Sunshine Precinct. We’ve been working really constructively with the airport and that’s been a bit of a deadlock between the three parties. And we’ve got- we’ll have a bit more to say about that shortly.

    JACQUI FELGATE: You talk about contracts. You mentioned the word that the state government had allocated contracts for Suburban Rail Loop, and then you just previously spoke to me about the importance of planning and the importance of allocating money where it should go in the right way. Given that the state government has already allocated contracts going forward that you are yet to put funding in, can you guarantee, like, are you still going to fund what has been contracted? Because the state government can’t do it all on their own.

    CATHERINE KING: Well I mean, Suburban Rail Loop East, we’ve been pretty clear. The commitment we made was to deliver $2.2 billion to that project, and we have now done that. Any further requests will need to be assessed by Infrastructure Australia, and that really is- I’ve been pretty firm about that. But obviously, the Victorian State Government is progressing that project, early works have been done. The tunnel boring machines, you’ll start to see those, I think, later this year, that’s been committed to. And we will consider further requests as they come in. 

    JACQUI FELGATE: Do you like that project, the Suburban Rail Loop? 

    CATHERINE KING: Yeah. Well, I grew up in the East. I grew up catching the train from Syndal Station into the city. Glen Waverley, that was my stomping ground from all my teenage years to my 20s, and I can absolutely recognise how difficult it is to get across and then what you’re trying to do at Monash, so trying to actually get public transport to Monash.

    JACQUI FELGATE: [Talks over] So, have you driven a lot from Cheltenham to Box Hill? 

    CATHERINE KING: Yeah, I have done, to be honest, on occasion. And then I was trying to get, because I grew up in Syndal, from Syndal to Monash and through there was always really difficult. But the other thing it unlocks is, if you live down Gippsland Way and you need to get your kid to the Children’s Hospital at Monash or you’re going to university, it also unlocks that. So, it’s actually got some really terrific benefits. 

    It’s also about building. If you look over- if anyone’s been over to WA, they’ve built this unbelievably huge Melbourne metro system which is unlocking new housing, new suburbs, new industrial precincts, and that’s what they’ve done there in recognition of the growth that is occurring. And so, that’s really what suburban rail sort of does. It provides that loop and that housing. 

    So, I think it’s a really- it’s seen as a necessary project. Infrastructure Australia says it’s an important project for the state. But there’s a little bit more work the state needs to do around the value capture proposition to convince Infrastructure Australia about where, how the money and the funding is all going to work together, and they’ll do that work over the course of the next year or so. 

    JACQUI FELGATE: One would hope. Catherine King is the Infrastructure Minister. Always appreciate your time.

    CATHERINE KING: Always happy to be with you. 

    JACQUI FELGATE: Thank you.

     

     

     

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI: Ambia Energy Wins Gold Stevie® Award in 2025 Stevie Awards for Sales & Customer Service

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    PROVO, Utah, March 06, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Ambia Energy’s Mason Boddy has won a Gold Stevie Award in the National Sales Executive of the Year category in the 19th annual Stevie Awards for Sales & Customer Service.

    The Stevie Awards for Sales & Customer Service are the world’s top honors for customer service, contact center, business development and sales professionals. The Stevie Awards organizes nine of the world’s leading business awards programs, also including the prestigious American Business Awards® and International Business Awards®.

    Winners will be celebrated during a gala event attended by more than 400 professionals from around the world at the Marriott Marquis Hotel in New York City on April 10.

    More than 2,100 nominations from organizations of all sizes and in virtually every industry, in 45 nations and territories, were considered in this year’s competition. Winners were determined by the average scores of 176 professionals worldwide on seven specialized judging committees.

    Mason Boddy’s recognition as Sales Executive of the Year reflects his outstanding leadership in building one of the most respected sales programs in the solar industry. Since joining Ambia as Chief Sales Officer, Mason has doubled the company’s revenue year-over-year despite industry-wide challenges in 2023. He has also cultivated a top-tier sales force with the highest Per Rep Average (PRA) selling program in the country. By reimagining pay structures and prioritizing team development, Mason has empowered his teams and fostered a high-performing culture built on collaboration and excellence. Judges commended him, stating, “Year-over-year sales growth of 147% despite the testing hardships experienced in the solar industry is extraordinary.”

    Stevie Awards president Maggie Miller stated, “The outstanding scores awarded to this year’s Stevie winners reflect the exceptional levels of achievement they demonstrate. We proudly join the judges and the entire Stevie Awards community in congratulating and celebrating the winners on their accomplishments.”

    The list of winners in all categories for The Stevie Awards for Sales & Customer Service are available at www.stevieawards.com/sales/2025-stevie-award-winners.

    About Ambia Energy
    Ambia Energy is a leading solar and home improvement company with a mission to help homeowners transform their properties into energy-efficient, sustainable spaces. With a focus on innovation, integrity, Ambia’s success is rooted in its dedication to improving the customer experience, ensuring high-quality installations, and fostering a culture of continuous growth and education among its employees.

    Contact
    Anne Heath
    anne.heath@ambiasolar.com

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI: IDT Corporation Reports Record Second Quarter 2025 Results

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Record levels of gross profit +16%; income from operations +77%; Adjusted EBITDA*+56%

    GAAP EPS increased to $0.80 from $0.57; Non-GAAP EPS*increased to $0.84 from $0.67

    IDT raised its quarterly dividend 20% to 6 cents

    NEWARK, NJ, March 06, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — IDT Corporation (NYSE: IDT), a global provider of fintech, cloud communications, and traditional communications solutions, today reported results for its second quarter fiscal year 2025, the three months ended January 31, 2025.

    SECOND QUARTER HIGHLIGHTS

    (Throughout this release, unless otherwise noted, results for the second quarter of fiscal year 2025 (2Q25) are compared to the second quarter of fiscal year 2024 (2Q24). All earnings per share (EPS) and other ‘per share’ results are per diluted share.

    • Key Businesses / Segments
      • NRS
        • Recurring revenue**: +32% to $31.6 million;
        • Income from operations: +71% to $9.1 million;
        • Adjusted EBITDA: +65% to $10.1 million;
        • ‘Rule of 40’ score**: 55
      • BOSS Money / Fintech segment
        • BOSS Money transactions: +36% to 5.7 million;
        • BOSS Money revenue: +34% to $33.5 million;
        • Fintech segment gross profit: +35% to $21.7 million;
        • Fintech segment income from operations: increased to $3.1 million from a loss of $(0.7) million;
        • Fintech segment Adjusted EBITDA: increased to $3.9 million from a loss of $(12) thousand;
      • net2phone
        • Subscription revenue**: +9% to $21.0 million (+14% on a constant currency basis);
        • Income from operations: increased to $1.1 million from $0.4 million;
        • Adjusted EBITDA: +55% to $2.9 million;
      • Traditional Communications
        • Gross profit: +2% to $43.1 million;
        • Income from operations: +24% to $18.1 million;
        • Adjusted EBITDA: +19% to $20.2 million;
    • IDT Consolidated
      • Revenue: +2% to $303.3 million;
      • Gross profit (GP) / margin: GP +16% to $112 million; GP margin +420 bps to 37.0%;
      • Income from operations: +77% to $28.3 million;
      • Net income attributable to IDT: +41% to $20.3 million;
      • GAAP EPS: Increased to $0.80 from $0.57;
      • Non-GAAP net income: +26% to $21.3 million;
      • Non-GAAP EPS: Increased to $0.84 from $0.67;
      • Adjusted EBITDA: +56% to $34.0 million;
      • CapEx: +6% to $4.8 million;
      • Stock buyback: Repurchased 179,338 shares of IDT Class B common stock in market transactions during 2Q25 for $8.5 million at an average share price of $47.59;
      • Common stock dividend: IDT increased its quarterly dividend from $0.05 to $0.06.

    REMARKS BY SHMUEL JONAS, CEO

    “IDT had a strong second quarter led by NRS and BOSS Money, and supported by robust results from our Traditional Communications segment, which increased its cash generation for the third consecutive quarter. On a consolidated basis, we again generated record levels of gross profit, income from operations, and Adjusted EBITDA.

    “NRS continued to deepen its penetration of the independent retailer market. We are now launching new features and functionalities that increase the value of our solution for retailers and will help us to drive additional growth.

    “BOSS Money delivered another quarter of strong year-over-year transaction and revenue growth. In the second quarter, we continued to focus on improving the margin contribution, particularly in our retail channel, and that effort helped to boost our Fintech segment’s gross profit and Adjusted EBITDA less CapEx to record levels.

    “net2phone continued its expansion led by further growth in the U.S. market. We are especially excited about last week’s launch of net2phone’s virtual AI agent. It has been very well received by our internal BOSS and NRS teams that are using it with great success to enhance the quality and consistency of customer interactions while reducing costs. We are confident that net2phone clients will find that it provides them with great value right out of the gate. Moreover, as they build with our AI agent, it will provide clients with increasingly sophisticated, tailored solutions that add value across disparate functions within their organizations.

    “Our Traditional Communications segment increased Adjusted EBITDA for the third sequential quarter and surpassed $20 million for the first time since fiscal 2022.

    “In light of our solid financial position and positive outlook, and mindful of the feedback we’ve received from our investors, we stepped up our repurchases of stock during the second quarter and have increased our regular quarterly dividend by 20%.”

    2Q25 RESULTS BY SEGMENT

    (For all periods presented, capital expenditures (CapEx), previously provided on a consolidated basis, is now also provided for each business segment.)

    National Retail Solutions (NRS)

    National Retail Solutions (NRS)
    (Terminals and accounts at end of period. $ in millions, except for average revenue per terminal)
          2Q25       1Q25       2Q24       2Q25-2Q24 (% Δ)  
    Terminals and payment processing accounts                                
    Active POS terminals     34,800       33,100       28,700       +21 %
    Payment processing accounts     23,900       22,700       18,200       +32 %
                                     
    Recurring revenue                                
     Merchant Services & Other   $ 18.1     $ 17.2     $ 12.5       +45 %
     Advertising & Data   $ 10.0     $ 8.5     $ 8.7       +15 %
     SaaS Fees   $ 3.5     $ 3.3     $ 2.7       +30 %
    Total recurring revenue   $ 31.6     $ 28.9     $ 23.9       +32 %
     POS terminal sales   $ 1.3     $ 1.4     $ 1.3       +2 %
    Total revenue   $ 33.0     $ 30.4     $ 25.2       +31 %
                                     
    Monthly average recurring revenue per terminal**   $ 310     $ 295     $ 285       +9 %
                                     
    Gross profit   $ 30.3     $ 27.6     $ 22.5       +35 %
    Gross profit margin     91.8 %     91.0 %     89.1 %     +270 bps
    Technology & development   $ 2.2     $ 2.0     $ 1.9       +14 %
    SG&A   $ 19.0     $ 19.0     $ 15.2       +25 %
    Income from operations   $ 9.1     $ 6.6     $ 5.3       +71 %
    Adjusted EBITDA   $ 10.1     $ 7.6     $ 6.1       +65 %
    CapEx   $ 0.9     $ 1.2     $ 1.0       (4 )%
                                     

    NRS Take-Aways / Updates:

    • NRS added approximately 1,700 net active terminals and approximately 1,200 net payment processing accounts during 2Q25. Net active terminal additions included the impact of approximately 300 terminals operating in seasonal stores that suspended operations following the quarter close.
    • The 45% year-over-year increase in Merchant Services & Other revenue was driven by the growth in payment processing accounts, and higher merchant services revenue per account, driven in part by the increased percentage of retail transactions paid with a credit or debit card.
    • The 30% year-over-year increase in SaaS Fees revenue reflects the growth of net active terminals and migration of retailers to premium SaaS plans.

    Fintech

    Fintech
    (Transactions in millions. $ in millions, except for average revenue per transaction)
          2Q25       1Q25       2Q24       2Q25-2Q24 (% Δ, $)  
    BOSS Money transactions     5.7       5.6       4.2       +36 %
                                     
    Fintech Revenue                                
    BOSS Money   $ 33.5     $ 33.7     $ 25.0       +34 %
    Other   $ 3.3     $ 3.4     $ 2.9       +13 %
    Total Revenue   $ 36.8     $ 37.1     $ 28.0       +32 %
                                     
    Average revenue per BOSS Money transaction**   $ 5.87     $ 6.01     $ 5.98     $ (0.11 )
                                     
    Gross profit   $ 21.7     $ 21.6     $ 16.1       +35 %
    Gross profit margin     58.9 %     58.2 %     57.5 %     140 bps
    Technology & development   $ 2.3     $ 2.3     $ 2.5       (8 )%
    SG&A   $ 16.3     $ 16.1     $ 14.3       +14 %
    Income (loss) from operations   $ 3.1     $ 3.2     $ (0.7 )     +$3.8  
    Adjusted EBITDA   $ 3.9     $ 4.0     $ 0       +$3.9  
    CapEx   $ 0.8     $ 1.1     $ 0.8       +1 %
                                     

    Fintech Take-Aways:

    • The 36% increase in BOSS Money transactions reflected a 40% year-over-year increase in digital transactions and a 22% increase in retail transactions.
    • BOSS Money revenue increased 34% year-over-year driven by a 38% year-over-year increase in digital channel revenue. The 1% sequential decrease in revenue reflected BOSS Money’s continued focus on expanding per-transaction margins, particularly at retail, which boosted gross profit while dampening transaction volume growth and revenue.
    • The strong increases in the Fintech segment’s income from operations and Adjusted EBITDA were driven by BOSS Money revenue growth, higher margins on BOSS Money transactions and improved operating leverage as the business continues to scale.
    • BOSS Money continued to expand to new destinations during 2Q25 (Venezuela and Eritrea) with Brazil expected to come online in 3Q25. BOSS Money also launched debit card payment capabilities at BOSS Money retailers across the U.S. and continued to build out its already extensive payout network in key destination markets.

    net2phone

    net2phone
    (Seats in thousands at end of period. $ in millions)
          2Q25       1Q25       2Q24       2Q25-2Q24 (% Δ, $)  
    Seats**     410       406       375       +9 %
                                     
    Revenue                                
    Subscription revenue   $ 21.0     $ 21.0     $ 19.3       +9 %
    Other revenue   $ 0.5     $ 0.6     $ 1.0       (54 )%
    Total Revenue   $ 21.5     $ 21.6     $ 20.4       +6 %
                                     
    Gross profit   $ 17.0     $ 17.1     $ 16.1       +6 %
    Gross profit margin     79.2 %     79.0 %     78.9 %     20 bps
    Technology & development   $ 2.8     $ 3.0     $ 2.6       +5 %
    SG&A   $ 13.0     $ 13.1     $ 13.1       (1 )%
    Income from operations   $ 1.1     $ 1.0     $ 0.4       +201 %
    Adjusted EBITDA   $ 2.9     $ 2.5     $ 1.8       +55 %
    CapEx   $ 1.8     $ 1.6     $ 1.4       +28 %
     

    net2phone Take-Aways:

    • The 9% year over year increase in total seats served was powered by continued expansion in key markets led by the U.S., Brazil, and Mexico. CCaaS seats served increased by 10% year-over year.
    • Subscription revenue increased by 9% year-over-year. The increase reflected net seat growth and increased subscription revenue per seat** in the U.S., offset by the negative FX impact of a strengthened U.S. dollar versus local currencies in net2phone’s key Latin American markets. On a constant currency basis, subscription revenue increased by 14% year over year.
    • Operating margin** increased to 5% from 2% in 2Q24, and Adjusted EBITDA margin** increased to 13% from 9% in 2Q24. Additional steady margin improvement remains a key strategic focus.
    • Following the quarter close, net2phone launched its AI agent, a scalable virtual assistant providing exceptional customer experiences across sales, support, and administrative tasks.

    Traditional Communications

    Traditional Communications
    ($ in millions)
          2Q25       1Q25       2Q24       2Q25-2Q24 (% Δ)  
    Revenue                                
    IDT Digital Payments   $ 101.6     $ 105.1     $ 99.7       +2 %
    BOSS Revolution   $ 53.3     $ 56.8     $ 66.7       (20 )%
    IDT Global   $ 51.3     $ 52.4     $ 48.7       +5 %
    Other   $ 5.9     $ 6.2     $ 7.5       (22 )%
    Total Revenue   $ 212.0     $ 220.5     $ 222.5       (5 )%
                                     
    Gross profit   $ 43.1     $ 41.3     $ 42.3       +2 %
    Gross profit margin     20.3 %     18.8 %     19.0 %     +130 bps
    Technology & development   $ 5.4     $ 5.5     $ 5.9       (9 )%
    SG&A   $ 19.4     $ 20.0     $ 21.4       (9 )%
    Income from operations   $ 18.1     $ 15.7     $ 14.6       +24 %
    Adjusted EBITDA   $ 20.2     $ 17.8     $ 17.0       +19 %
    CapEx   $ 1.2     $ 1.4     $ 1.4       (8 )%
                                     

    Take-Aways: 

    • IDT Global continues to mitigate the impacts of the ongoing industry-wide declines in paid-minute voice through a traffic mix shift to higher margin routes, new service offerings, and operational efficiencies.
    • For the third consecutive quarter, Traditional Communications’ income from operations and Adjusted EBITDA both increased sequentially. In 2Q25, the increases were driven by increasing gross profit contributions from each of the three major lines of business, as well as by continued efforts to streamline operations and remove costs.

    OTHER FINANCIAL RESULTS

    Consolidated results for all periods presented include corporate overhead. In 2Q25, Corporate G&A expense decreased to $3.0 million from $3.2 million in 2Q24.

    As of January 31, 2025, IDT held $171.1 million in cash, cash equivalents, debt securities, and current equity investments. Also at January 31, 2025, current assets totaled $462.1 million and current liabilities totaled $278.2 million. The Company had no outstanding debt at the quarter end.

    Net cash provided by operating activities decreased to $20.2 million in 2Q25 from $28.4 million in 2Q24. Exclusive of changes in customer funds deposits at IDT’s Fintech segment, net cash provided by operating activities decreased to $7.3 million in 2Q25 from $25.4 million in 2Q24. This decrease predominantly reflects the timing of payments made by IDT to cover anticipated BOSS Money disbursement prefunding.

    Capital expenditures increased to $4.8 million in 2Q25 from $4.6 million in 2Q24.

    IDT EARNINGS ANNOUNCEMENT INFORMATION

    This release is available for download in the “Investors & Media” section of the IDT Corporation website (https://www.idt.net/investors-and-media) and has been filed on a current report (Form 8-K) with the SEC.

    IDT will host an earnings conference call beginning at 5:30 PM Eastern today with management’s discussion of results followed by Q&A with investors. To listen to the call and participate in the Q&A, dial 1-888-506-0062 (toll-free from the US) or 1-973-528-0011 (international) and provide the following access code: 145736.

    A replay of the conference call will be available approximately three hours after the call concludes through March 20, 2025. To access the call replay, dial 1-877-481-4010 (toll-free from the US) or 1-919-882-2331 (international) and provide this replay passcode: 51975. The replay will also be accessible via streaming audio at the IDT investor relations website.

    NOTES

    *Adjusted EBITDA and Non-GAAP EPS are Non-GAAP financial measures intended to provide useful information that supplements IDT’s or the relevant segment’s results in accordance with GAAP. Please refer to the Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures later in this release for an explanation of these terms and their respective reconciliations to the most directly comparable GAAP measures.

    **See ‘Explanation of Key Performance Metrics’ at the end of this release.

    ABOUT IDT CORPORATION

    IDT Corporation (NYSE: IDT) is a global provider of fintech and communications solutions through a portfolio of synergistic businesses: National Retail Solutions (NRS), through its point-of-sale (POS) platform, enables independent retailers to operate more effectively while providing advertisers and marketers with unprecedented reach into underserved consumer markets; BOSS Money facilitates innovative international remittances and fintech payments solutions; net2phone provides enterprises and organizations with intelligently integrated cloud communications and contact center services across channels and devices; IDT Digital Payments and the BOSS Revolution calling service make sharing prepaid products and services and speaking with friends and family around the world convenient and reliable; and, IDT Global and IDT Express enable communications services to provision and manage international voice and SMS messaging.

    All statements above that are not purely about historical facts, including, but not limited to, those in which we use the words “believe,” “anticipate,” “expect,” “plan,” “intend,” “estimate,” “target” and similar expressions, are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. While these forward-looking statements represent our current judgment of what may happen in the future, actual results may differ materially from the results expressed or implied by these statements due to numerous important factors. Our filings with the SEC provide detailed information on such statements and risks and should be consulted along with this release. To the extent permitted under applicable law, IDT assumes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements.

    CONTACT

    IDT Corporation Investor Relations
    Bill Ulrey
    william.ulrey@idt.net
    973-438-3838

    IDT CORPORATION
    CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

        January 31,
    2025
        July 31,
    2024
     
        (Unaudited)        
        (in thousands, except per share data)  
    Assets            
    Current assets:                
    Cash and cash equivalents   $ 142,152     $ 164,557  
    Restricted cash and cash equivalents     105,554       90,899  
    Debt securities     23,852       23,438  
    Equity investments     5,091       5,009  
    Trade accounts receivable, net of allowance for credit losses of $7,295 at January 31, 2025 and $6,352 at July 31, 2024     45,127       42,215  
    Settlement assets, net of reserve of $1,804 at January 31, 2025 and $1,866 at July 31, 2024     41,779       22,186  
    Disbursement prefunding     57,676       30,736  
    Prepaid expenses     15,989       17,558  
    Other current assets     24,914       25,927  
    Total current assets     462,134       422,525  
    Property, plant, and equipment, net     38,380       38,652  
    Goodwill     26,149       26,288  
    Other intangibles, net     5,583       6,285  
    Equity investments     6,748       6,518  
    Operating lease right-of-use assets     2,498       3,273  
    Deferred income tax assets, net     22,333       35,008  
    Other assets     11,903       11,546  
    Total assets   $ 575,728     $ 550,095  
    Liabilities, redeemable noncontrolling interest, and equity                
    Current liabilities:                
    Trade accounts payable   $ 22,482     $ 24,773  
    Accrued expenses     89,472       103,176  
    Deferred revenue     28,384       30,364  
    Customer funds deposits     104,720       91,893  
    Settlement liabilities     16,975       12,764  
    Other current liabilities     16,157       16,374  
    Total current liabilities     278,190       279,344  
    Operating lease liabilities     1,349       1,533  
    Other liabilities     1,093       2,662  
                     
    Total liabilities     280,632       283,539  
    Commitments and contingencies                
    Redeemable noncontrolling interest     11,228       10,901  
    Equity:                
    IDT Corporation stockholders’ equity:                
    Preferred stock, $.01 par value; authorized shares—10,000; no shares issued            
    Class A common stock, $.01 par value; authorized shares—35,000; 3,272 shares issued and 1,574 shares outstanding at January 31, 2025 and July 31, 2024     33       33  
    Class B common stock, $.01 par value; authorized shares—200,000; 28,233 and 28,177 shares issued and 23,491 and 23,684 shares outstanding at January 31, 2025 and July 31, 2024, respectively     282       282  
    Additional paid-in capital     306,781       303,510  
    Treasury stock, at cost, consisting of 1,698 and 1,698 shares of Class A common stock and 4,742 and 4,493 shares of Class B common stock at January 31, 2025 and July 31, 2024, respectively     (137,475 )     (126,080 )
    Accumulated other comprehensive loss     (19,599 )     (18,142 )
    Retained earnings     121,573       86,580  
    Total IDT Corporation stockholders’ equity     271,595       246,183  
    Noncontrolling interests     12,273       9,472  
    Total equity     283,868       255,655  
    Total liabilities, redeemable noncontrolling interest, and equity   $ 575,728     $ 550,095  

    IDT CORPORATION
    CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
    (Unaudited)

        Three Months Ended
    January 31,
        Six Months Ended
    January 31,
     
        2025     2024     2025     2024  
        (in thousands, except per share data)  
           
    Revenues   $ 303,349     $ 296,098     $ 612,915     $ 597,302  
    Direct cost of revenues     191,239       199,171       393,178       406,382  
    Gross profit     112,110       96,927       219,737       190,920  
    Operating expenses (gain):                                
    Selling, general and administrative (i)     70,721       67,346       141,772       131,723  
    Technology and development (i)     12,612       12,925       25,372       25,335  
    Severance     233       345       410       869  
    Other operating expense (gain), net     227       294       227       (190 )
    Total operating expenses     83,793       80,910       167,781       157,737  
    Income from operations     28,317       16,017       51,956       33,183  
    Interest income, net     1,354       1,195       2,782       2,039  
    Other income (expense), net     207       2,534       (76 )     (3,053 )
    Income before income taxes     29,878       19,746       54,662       32,169  
    Provision for income taxes     (7,665 )     (3,992 )     (13,967 )     (7,939 )
    Net income     22,213       15,754       40,695       24,230  
    Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests     (1,944 )     (1,329 )     (3,178 )     (2,146 )
    Net income attributable to IDT Corporation   $ 20,269     $ 14,425     $ 37,517     $ 22,084  
    Earnings per share attributable to IDT Corporation common stockholders:                                
    Basic   $ 0.81     $ 0.57     $ 1.49     $ 0.88  
    Diluted   $ 0.80     $ 0.57     $ 1.48     $ 0.87  
    Weighted-average number of shares used in calculation of earnings per share:                                
    Basic     25,161       25,175       25,182       25,176  
    Diluted     25,324       25,317       25,343       25,297  
    (i) Stock-based compensation included in:                                
    Selling, general and administrative expense   $ 768     $ 2,357     $ 1,602     $ 2,998  
    Technology and development expense   $ 95     $ 130     $ 172     $ 260  


    IDT CORPORATION 

    CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)

        Six Months Ended
    January 31,
     
        2025     2024  
        (in thousands)  
    Operating activities                
    Net income   $ 40,695     $ 24,230  
    Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:                
    Depreciation and amortization     10,490       10,146  
    Deferred income taxes     12,674       5,787  
    Provision for credit losses, doubtful accounts receivable, and reserve for settlement assets     2,472       1,696  
    Stock-based compensation     1,774       3,258  
    Other     1,077       2,829  
    Changes in assets and liabilities:                
    Trade accounts receivable     (4,978 )     (7,040 )
    Settlement assets, disbursement prefunding, prepaid expenses, other current assets, and other assets     (46,244 )     9,966  
    Trade accounts payable, accrued expenses, settlement liabilities, other current liabilities, and other liabilities     (11,844 )     (6,200 )
    Customer funds deposits     15,701       15  
    Deferred revenue     (1,500 )     (1,381 )
    Net cash provided by operating activities     20,317       43,306  
    Investing activities                
    Capital expenditures     (10,100 )     (8,885 )
    Purchase of convertible preferred stock in equity method investment     (673 )     (1,009 )
    Purchases of debt securities and equity investments     (15,997 )     (19,357 )
    Proceeds from maturities and sales of debt securities and redemption of equity investments     16,751       31,231  
    Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities     (10,019 )     1,980  
    Financing activities                
    Dividends paid     (2,524 )      
    Distributions to noncontrolling interests     (50 )     (59 )
    Proceeds from borrowings under revolving credit facility     24,534       30,588  
    Repayment of borrowings under revolving credit facility     (24,534 )     (30,588 )
    Purchase of restricted shares of net2phone common stock           (3,558 )
    Proceeds from exercise of stock options           172  
    Repurchases of Class B common stock     (11,395 )     (3,170 )
    Net cash used in financing activities     (13,969 )     (6,615 )
    Effect of exchange rate changes on cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash and cash equivalents     (4,079 )     (3,182 )
    Net (decrease) increase in cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash and cash equivalents     (7,750 )     35,489  
    Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period     255,456       198,823  
    Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash and cash equivalents at end of period   $ 247,706     $ 234,312  
    Supplemental Schedule of Non-Cash Financing Activities                
    Shares of the Company’s Class B common stock issued to an executive officer for bonus payment   $ 1,824     $  
    Value of the Company’s Class B common stock exchanged for National Retail Solutions shares   $     $ 6,254  


    *
    Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures for the Second Quarter Fiscal 2025 and 2024

    In addition to disclosing financial results that are determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (GAAP), IDT also disclosed for 2Q25, 1Q25, and 2Q24, Adjusted EBITDA, and for 2Q25 and 2Q24, non-GAAP earnings per diluted share (Non-GAAP EPS). Adjusted EBITDA and Non-GAAP EPS are non-GAAP financial measures intended to provide useful information that supplements IDT’s or the relevant segment’s results in accordance with GAAP. The following explains these terms and their respective reconciliations to the most directly comparable GAAP measures

    Generally, a non-GAAP measure is a numerical measure of a company’s performance, financial position, or cash flows that either excludes or includes amounts that are not normally excluded or included in the most directly comparable measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP.

    IDT’s measure of Non-GAAP EPS is calculated by dividing non-GAAP net income by the diluted weighted-average shares. IDT’s measure of non-GAAP net income starts with net income attributable to IDT in accordance with GAAP and adds severance expense, stock-based compensation, and other operating expenses, and deducts other operating gains. These additions and subtractions are non-cash and/or non-routine items in the relevant fiscal 2025 and fiscal 2024 periods.

    Management believes that IDT’s Adjusted EBITDA and Non-GAAP EPS are measures which provide useful information to both management and investors by excluding certain expenses and non-routine gains and losses that may not be indicative of IDT’s or the relevant segment’s core operating results. Management uses Adjusted EBITDA, among other measures, as a relevant indicator of core operational strengths in its financial and operational decision making. In addition, management uses Adjusted EBITDA and Non-GAAP EPS to evaluate operating performance in relation to IDT’s competitors. Disclosure of these financial measures may be useful to investors in evaluating performance and allows for greater transparency to the underlying supplemental information used by management in its financial and operational decision-making. In addition, IDT has historically reported similar financial measures and believes such measures are commonly used by readers of financial information in assessing performance, therefore the inclusion of comparative numbers provides consistency in financial reporting.

    Management refers to Adjusted EBITDA, as well as the GAAP measures income (loss) from operations and net income, on a segment and/or consolidated level to facilitate internal and external comparisons to the segments’ and IDT’s historical operating results, in making operating decisions, for budget and planning purposes, and to form the basis upon which management is compensated.

    While depreciation and amortization are considered operating costs under GAAP, these expenses primarily represent the non-cash current period allocation of costs associated with long-lived assets acquired or capitalized in prior periods. IDT’s Adjusted EBITDA, which is exclusive of depreciation and amortization, is a useful indicator of its current performance.

    Severance expense is excluded from the calculation of Adjusted EBITDA and Non-GAAP EPS. Severance expense is reflective of decisions made by management in each period regarding the aspects of IDT’s and its segments’ businesses to be focused on in light of changing market realities and other factors. While there may be similar charges in other periods, the nature and magnitude of these charges can fluctuate markedly and do not reflect the performance of IDT’s core and continuing operations.

    Other operating (expense) gain, net, which is a component of income (loss) from operations, is excluded from the calculation of Adjusted EBITDA and Non-GAAP EPS. Other operating (expense) gain, net includes, among other items, legal fees net of insurance claims related to Straight Path Communications Inc.’s stockholders’ class action and gain from the write-off of a contingent consideration liability. From time-to-time, IDT may have gains or incur costs related to non-routine legal, tax, and other matters, however, these various items generally do not occur each quarter. IDT believes the gain and losses from these non-routine matters are not components of IDT’s or the relevant segment’s core operating results.

    Stock-based compensation recognized by IDT and other companies may not be comparable because of the variety of types of awards as well as the various valuation methodologies and subjective assumptions that are permitted under GAAP. Stock-based compensation is excluded from IDT’s calculation of Non-GAAP EPS because management believes this allows investors to make more meaningful comparisons of the operating results per share of IDT’s core business with the results of other companies. However, stock-based compensation will continue to be a significant expense for IDT for the foreseeable future and an important part of employees’ compensation that impacts their performance.

    Adjusted EBITDA and Non-GAAP EPS should be considered in addition to, not as a substitute for, or superior to, income (loss) from operations, cash flow from operating activities, net income, basic and diluted earnings per share or other measures of liquidity and financial performance prepared in accordance with GAAP. In addition, IDT’s measurements of Adjusted EBITDA and Non-GAAP EPS may not be comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other companies.

    Following are reconciliations of Adjusted EBITDA and Non-GAAP EPS to the most directly comparable GAAP measure, which are, (a) for Adjusted EBITDA, income (loss) from operations for IDT’s reportable segments and net income for IDT on a consolidated basis, and (b) for Non-GAAP EPS, diluted earnings per share.

    IDT Corporation
    Reconciliation of Net Income to Adjusted EBITDA
    (unaudited) in millions. Figures may not foot or cross-foot due to rounding to millions

        Total IDT Corporation     Traditional Communica-tions     net2phone     NRS     Fintech     Corporate  
    Three Months Ended January 31, 2025
    (2Q25)
                                                   
    Net income attributable to IDT Corporation   $ 20.3                                          
    Adjustments:                                                
    Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests     1.9                                          
    Net income     22.2                                          
    Provision for income taxes     7.7                                          
    Income before income taxes     29.9                                          
     Interest income, net     (1.4 )                                        
     Other income, net     (0.2 )                                        
    Income (loss) from operations     28.3     $ 18.1     $ 1.1     $ 9.1     $ 3.1     $ (3.1 )
    Depreciation and amortization     5.2       1.9       1.6       1.0       0.8        
    Other operating expense, net     0.2             0.2                    
    Severance     0.2       0.2                          
    Adjusted EBITDA   $ 34.0     $ 20.2     $ 2.9     $ 10.1     $ 3.9     $ (3.1 )


    IDT Corporation

    Reconciliation of Net Income to Adjusted EBITDA
    (unaudited) in millions. Figures may not foot or cross-foot due to rounding to millions

        Total IDT Corporation     Traditional Communica-tions     net2phone     NRS     Fintech     Corporate  
    Three Months Ended October 31, 2024
    (1Q25)
                                                   
    Net income attributable to IDT Corporation   $ 17.2                                          
    Adjustments:                                                
    Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests     1.2                                          
    Net income     18.5                                          
    Provision for income taxes     6.3                                          
    Income before income taxes     24.8                                          
     Interest income, net     (1.4 )                                        
     Other expense, net     0.3                                          
    Income (loss) from operations     23.6     $ 15.7     $ 1.0     $ 6.6     $ 3.2     $ (2.9 )
    Depreciation and amortization     5.2       2.0       1.6       1.0       0.7        
    Severance     0.2       0.2                          
    Adjusted EBITDA   $ 29.1     $ 17.8     $ 2.5     $ 7.6     $ 4.0     $ (2.9 )
        Total IDT Corporation     Traditional Communica-tions     net2phone     NRS     Fintech     Corporate  
    Three Months Ended January 31, 2024
    (2Q24)
                                                   
    Net income attributable to IDT Corporation   $ 14.4                                          
    Adjustments:                                                
    Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests     1.3                                          
    Net income     15.8                                          
    Provision for income taxes     4.0                                          
    Income before income taxes     19.7                                          
     Interest income, net     (1.2 )                                        
     Other income, net     (2.5 )                                        
    Income (loss) from operations     16.0     $ 14.6     $ 0.4     $ 5.3     $ (0.7 )   $ (3.6 )
    Depreciation and amortization     5.1       2.0       1.6       0.8       0.7        
    Severance     0.3       0.3                          
    Other operating expense (gain), net     0.3             (0.1 )                 0.4  
    Adjusted EBITDA   $ 21.8     $ 17.0     $ 1.8     $ 6.1     $     $ (3.2 )

    IDT Corporation
    Reconciliation of Earnings per share to Non-GAAP EPS
    (unaudited) in millions, except per share data. Figures may not foot due to rounding to millions.

          2Q25       2Q24  
                     
    Net income attributable to IDT Corporation   $ 20.3     $ 14.4  
    Adjustments (add) subtract:                
    Stock-based compensation     (0.9 )     (2.5 )
    Severance expense     (0.2 )     (0.3 )
    Other operating expense, net     (0.2 )     (0.3 )
    Total adjustments     (1.3 )     (3.1 )
    Income tax effect of total adjustments     (0.3 )     (0.6 )
          1.0       2.5  
    Non-GAAP net income   $ 21.3     $ 16.9  
                     
    Earnings per share:                
    Basic   $ 0.81     $ 0.57  
    Total adjustments     0.03       0.10  
    Non-GAAP – basic   $ 0.84     $ 0.67  
                     
    Weighted-average number of shares used in calculation of basic earnings per share     25.2       25.2  
                     
    Diluted   $ 0.80     $ 0.57  
    Total adjustments     0.04       0.10  
    Non-GAAP – diluted   $ 0.84     $ 0.67  
                     
    Weighted-average number of shares used in calculation of diluted earnings per share     25.3       25.3  


    *
    *Explanation of Key Performance Metrics

    NRS’ recurring revenue is calculated by subtracting NRS’ revenue from POS terminal sales from its revenue in accordance with GAAP. NRS’ Monthly Average Recurring Revenue per Terminal is calculated by dividing NRS’ recurring revenue by the average number of active POS terminals during the period. The average number of active POS terminals is calculated by adding the beginning and ending number of active POS terminals during the period and dividing by two. NRS’ recurring revenue divided by the average number of active POS terminals is divided by three when the period is a fiscal quarter. Recurring revenue and Monthly Average Recurring Revenue per Terminal are useful for comparisons of NRS’ revenue and revenue per customer to prior periods and to competitors and others in the market, as well as for forecasting future revenue from the customer base.

    The NRS ‘Rule of 40’ score is a metric used to evaluate the performance of SaaS providers. It postulates that a SaaS company’s growth rate when added to its free cash flow rate should equal or exceed 40 percent. For NRS, the ‘Rule of 40’ result for 2Q25 is computed by adding the growth rate of NRS’ recurring revenue for 2Q25 compared to 2Q24 to NRS’ Adjusted EBITDA less CapEx as a percentage of total NRS revenue for the twelve months ended January 31, 2025. The ‘Rule of 40’ is a common SaaS industry metric to assess a company’s balance between growth and profitability. A total above 40 is thought to indicate a healthy combination of expansion and financial stability, making it a useful tool for investors and management to gauge the potential for long-term success and make informed decisions about resource allocation and business strategy.

    net2phone’s subscription revenue is calculated by subtracting net2phone’s equipment revenue and revenue generated by a legacy SIP trunking offering in Brazil from its revenue in accordance with GAAP. net2phone’s cloud communications and contact center offerings are priced on a per-seat basis, with customers paying based on the number of users in their organization. The number of seats served and subscription revenue trends and comparisons between periods are used in the analysis of net2phone’s revenues and direct cost of revenues and are strong indications of the top-line growth and performance of the business.

    net2phone’s subscription revenue per seat is calculated by dividing net2phone’s subscription revenue, as defined in the preceding paragraph, by the average number of seats served during the period. The average number of seats served is calculated by adding the beginning and ending number of seats served and dividing by two. Subscription revenue per seat is the amount of revenue generated by each seat sold during the period. It provides a basis for pricing seat-based services, as well as for comparing performance in past periods and projecting future revenue, and for comparing the value of each seat served to competitors.

    net2phone’s operating margin is calculated by dividing GAAP income from operations by GAAP revenue for the period indicated. Operating margin measures the percentage that each dollar of revenue contributes to profitability. Operating margin is useful for evaluating current period profitability relative to sales, for comparisons to prior period performance, for forecasting future income from operations levels based on projected levels of sales, and for comparing net2phone’s relative profitability to its competitors and peers.

    net2phone’s Adjusted EBITDA margin is calculated by dividing net2phone’s Adjusted EBITDA, a Non-GAAP measure, by net2phone’s GAAP revenue for the comparable quarter or period. Adjusted EBITDA margin measures the percentage that each dollar of revenue contributes to profitability before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, and other adjustments as described in the Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures. net2phone’s Adjusted EBITDA margin is useful for evaluating current period profitability relative to sales, for comparisons to prior period performance, for forecasting future Adjusted EBITDA levels based on projected levels of sales, and for comparing net2phone’s relative profitability to its competitors and peers.

    BOSS Money’s Average Revenue per Transaction is calculated by dividing BOSS Money’s revenue in accordance with GAAP by the number of transactions during the period. Average Revenue per Transaction is useful for comparisons of BOSS Money’s revenue per transaction to prior periods and to competitors and others in the market, as well as for forecasting future revenue based on transaction trends.

    # # #

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI USA: Ernst Exposes Concerning Ties to China in Critical Defense Program

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator Joni Ernst (R-IA)
    WASHINGTON – During a Senate Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship hearing, Chair Joni Ernst (R-Iowa) demonstrated why it is critical to pass her INNOVATE Act to strengthen due diligence of foreign ties for recipients of the Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) and Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) programs.
    During the hearing, Ernst exposed how inconsistent vetting standards within the programs have allowed companies with ties to China to receive hundreds of millions of tax dollars for critical defense research, including the company of one of the witnesses testifying before the committee.
    Click here to watch Chair Ernst’s questioning.
    Ernst questioned Triton Systems Executive Vice President Dr. Ken Mahmud on concerning ties between his company’s chief executive officer and a Chinese Communist Party-backed investment firm, CITIC Capital Acquisition Corp. These ties are especially concerning because Triton has received more than 900 SBIR awards amounting to more than $350 million. Mahmud acknowledged China’s ties to Triton but failed to address concerns that taxpayer-funded technology, including sensitive intellectual property, ended up benefitting China.
    Ernst’s INNOVATE Act would address this by closing loopholes and strengthening the due diligence assessment of foreign risks to prevent malign foreign actors from stealing innovation that is critical to national security. It would also require agencies to claw back awards if taxpayer-funded intellectual property is exposed to America’s foreign adversaries.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Global: Money laundering plays a key role in every part of the illegal drugs industry – here’s how it works

    Source: The Conversation – UK – By Mark Berry, Lecturer In Criminology, Bournemouth University

    R Mendoza/Shutterstock

    The global illicit drugs trade is estimated to be worth at least half a trillion US dollars each year. Drugs such as cocaine, methamphetamine and heroin generate large revenues all along their supply chains, from where the products (and precursor materials) are grown or made – principally Colombia and Bolivia, China, Afghanistan, and the “golden triangle” of Myanmar, Laos and Thailand – to wherever the finished drugs are consumed.

    Earnings in the illicit drug trade are variable. Few people will make the kind of money that once put the Mexican former cartel boss Joaquín “El Chapo” Guzmán on the Forbes list of global billionaires. But while drug “kingpins” are the industry’s biggest individual earners, they do not hold the majority of the drug money that is generated throughout the global supply chain.

    Despite their frequent glamorisation in film and TV portrayals, drug cartels are basically international logistics companies. They work with distributors in different countries who deliver the drugs to regional wholesalers, who in turn supply the local retailers (dealers) who sell drugs to individuals.

    Everyone along the supply chain takes their cut, with most people making much more modest incomes than the millionaire drug traffickers of narcocorrido lore. In our interviews with illicit drug entrepreneurs in the US and UK, we routinely spoke to sellers whose incomes ranged from pocket money to providing a moderately comfortable life.



    Illicit drug use is damaging large parts of the world socially, politically and environmentally. Patterns of supply and demand are changing rapidly. In our longform series Addicted, leading experts bring you the latest insights on drug use and production as we ask: is it time to declare a planetary emergency?


    Around 70% to 80% of the overall revenue generated by illicit drugs is shared among the many wholesale and street-level dealers in destination countries such as the UK and US, where the price per gram is at its highest. How this money moves and is used to sustain the illicit drug trade should be an important part of any worthwhile counter-narcotics strategy. But it rarely is.

    Professional money launderers

    The people and organisations responsible for laundering drug revenues – that is, transforming them into untraceable money that can easily be spent, or into assets that can be held or sold – often exist under the radar of law enforcement and the media.

    Yet the ways illicit drug money is laundered are hardly a mystery. Techniques include wire transfers to offshore bank accounts, investments in shell companies or deposits in cash businesses, and buying foreign currencies or (to a small extent) cryptocurrencies. In addition, the straightforward physical transportation of cash across national borders is an often-used method known as a “bulk cash transfer”.

    The largest players in the illicit drugs industry, such as international cartels, national distributors and large-scale wholesalers, often use professional money launderers – some of whom have seemingly reputable jobs in the financial sector. In one recent case, US financial regulators fined TD Bank US$3 billion (£2.4 billion) – a record penalty for a bank – for facilitating the laundering of millions of dollars of drug cartel money.

    Over six years, more than 90% of the bank’s transactions went unmonitored, enabling “three money laundering networks to collectively transfer more than US$670 million through TD Bank accounts”. Then-US attorney general Merrick Garland commented: “By making its services convenient for criminals, [TD Bank] became one.”

    Video: CBC News.

    Some money laundering networks are as global as the drug supply chains they service. In June 2024, the US Department of Justice’s (DoJ) multi-year “Operation Fortune Runner” investigation saw LA-based associates of Mexico’s Sinaloa drug cartel charged with conspiring with money-laundering groups linked to a Chinese underground banking network. According to the IRS’s head of criminal investigation, Guy Ficco:

    Drug traffickers generate immense amounts of cash through their illicit operations. This case is a prime example of Chinese money launderers working hand-in-hand with drug traffickers to try to legitimise profits generated by drug activities.

    According to the DoJ, “many wealthy Chinese nationals” barred from transferring large amounts to the US by the Chinese government’s capital flight restrictions seek informal alternatives to the conventional banking system – including via schemes to launder illicit drug money. The DoJ explained how this works:

    The China-based investor contacts an individual who has US dollars available to sell in the United States. This seller of US dollars provides identifying information for a bank account in China, with instructions for the investor to deposit Chinese currency (renminbi) in that account. Once the owner of the account sees the deposit, an equivalent amount of US dollars is released to the buyer in the United States.

    These arrangements are not unique to Chinese actors. Similar arrangements occur throughout the world, including schemes to leverage the black market peso exchange and the Hawala international money transfer system.

    Professional launderers are both creating and exploiting vulnerabilities in the global financial system. Such corruption allows suspicious transactions to occur without proper checks or oversight. This not only reduces transparency in the financial system but erodes public trust in it.

    How cartels launder their money

    International drug cartels and national wholesalers have a smaller markup on their transactions, compared with retailers. But because they are responsible for moving enormous quantities of illicit drugs, they still generate millions of dollars worth of revenue.

    The most prolific known drug distributors in US history, Margarito Flores Jr and his twin brother Pedro, delivered billions of dollars worth of cocaine, heroin and methamphetamines to their US and Canadian wholesale clients between 1998 and 2009. They were working for Guzmán and Ismeal “El Mayo” Zambada García, then leaders of the Sinaloa cartel, as well as the Mexican Beltrán Leyva brothers whose cartel bore their surname.

    Today, Margarito Flores Jr trains law enforcement across the US in the methods he and his brother used to traffic drugs and run their business. In January 2015, both men were sentenced to 14 years for drug trafficking – Margarito Flores Jr would later reach out to one of this article’s authors (R.V. Gundur) after reading his book, Trying to Make It: The Enterprises, Gangs, and People of the American Drug Trade, which includes a comprehensive account of the Flores crew’s activities.

    In a subsequent interview, he told us: “My brother and I estimate that, if we added up all of the money we sent back to Mexico over the decade we sold drugs, it was probably more than US$3.5 billion.”

    The billions they remitted to Mexico were used by Guzmán, Zambada and the Beltrán Levya brothers not only to expand their drug businesses, but to corrupt powerful figures such as Mexico’s former secretary of public security, Genaro García Luna.

    García Luna, who was Mexico’s highest-ranking law enforcement official from 2006 to 2012, was sentenced to nearly 40 years in prison in October 2024 after being found guilty of taking millions of dollars in bribes from the Sinaloa cartel, as well as enabling the trafficking of more than a million kilograms of cocaine into the US. Flores explained to us:

    It’s important to understand that corruption impacts people at all levels of government. Our payoffs included local police and other people in the community, up to higher-positioned people in government. Lots of that money ended up funding the violent conflicts between cartels.

    While there has been widespread coverage of cartel drug money being laundered through high-profile businesses and banks such as Wachovia and HSBC, Flores suggested that “the money involved in the drug trade is a lot more than anybody really can understand”. The reason for this, he said, is that it’s very hard to track the flow of hard cash via lorries, boats, planes and even drones. Flores told us:

    It’s a misconception that everyone who makes a lot of money in drugs or other illegal business makes an effort to launder their money. My brother and I held much of what we earned in cash. We knew the government could eventually take everything [else].

    The twins were right: in time, that’s exactly what the US government did.

    ‘Everyday’ money laundering

    In our study of money laundering strategies used by people involved in the illicit drug trade in the UK and US, we found that street dealers do not typically undertake sophisticated laundering processes. Rather, they spend their cash on food and other routine living expenses. One independent UK drug dealer, whose experience was typical of many, used the money earned from his cocaine sales to buy groceries and pay bills for himself and his daughter.

    Spending money, even small amounts, gained through illegal activities is a money laundering offence – albeit one that is seldom prosecuted. As a result, these everyday activities that return illicit drug money to the legal economy are not well accounted for – even though the street value of drugs drives global market value estimates.

    Business-savvy street dealers can earn gross revenues that approach the earnings of high-paid white-collar workers. But they must disguise their earnings’ origins before they can spend them, of course, and various tactics are used to do this.

    Some dealers solicit close friends or family members to act as “strawmen”. These are people willing to put assets paid for by illicit drug money – such as cars, properties or even businesses – in their names on behalf of the dealer. Idris Elba’s character Stringer Bell in HBO’s The Wire was an accurate portrayal of someone investing in legal enterprises using illicit drug money.

    A guide to Stringer Bell’s character in The Wire. Video: Just an Observation.

    These strategies occur wherever illegal enterprise exists, and have done for well over a century. In the US, we interviewed wholesalers who had used family members to own houses and other properties on their behalf. This is done to mitigate against the risk of asset forfeiture should they be convicted of a crime. If an illicit enterprise can create a plausible beneficial owner who is not involved in crime, then the asset is harder to seize. This is why the Donald Trump administration’s recent suspension of beneficial owner oversight is problematic from a drug enforcement perspective.

    In liberal democracies, governments cannot investigate someone’s finances simply because they are related to criminals. The dirty money that is put into their accounts can also be disguised as legitimate income making it difficult to identify, although thorough investigations may uncover it.

    In the UK, we also talked to successful drug retailers who had set up local businesses in their own names. The EU’s law enforcement agency, Europol, has reported similar activities throughout Europe.

    Legal businesses are a common – and often hard-to-detect – vehicle to launder drug money. Bars, clubs, gyms, and hair, nail and tanning salons can be readily set up with drug money, as large cash infusions to establish a business are often not well scrutinised. These businesses are comparatively easy to run with significant cash flows, providing suitable cover for dirty money.

    For example, a beauty salon, especially one that offers high-value boutique services, could easily incorporate drug revenue into its financial accounts by reporting sales that do not occur. Tanning salons can be set up with little expense since they require only sunbeds and the rental of a property.

    Along with bars, clubs and salons, construction companies and restaurants stand out as other cash-intensive businesses with high volumes of transactions – characteristics that make good fronts for laundering money.

    It’s hard to spot a ‘dirty’ business

    There is no surefire way to tell whether a business is a laundering front. While some may look like enterprises struggling to stay afloat, others develop into viable operations that eventually no longer need dirty money to sustain them.

    Some drug dealers incorporate laundering practices within their legitimate jobs. Tradespeople such as electricians or plumbers, for example, can launder money by generating invoices for fake jobs, then reporting the income on their tax returns.

    In both the UK and US, tax authorities are not charged with evaluating the veracity of the funds reported, and are generally satisfied once tax is paid. In other words, they generally trust declared income as proof of legal business activity. Moreover, they, along with the police, lack the resources to investigate these businesses for money laundering.

    Through their legal businesses, many drug dealers pay significant taxes on their illegal revenue, and thus contribute to the economy.

    Paying income tax effectively renders this income laundered. It can be invested and used to set up other businesses, or to purchase cars and properties without suspicion. It can also bolster credit ratings, and improve access to legal financial services such as bank loans.

    Many small-time drug dealers start legal businesses in order to exit the illicit drug trade. We interviewed one cocaine dealer who had used his drug money to set up a retail electronics store; once it was successful, he stopped dealing. Similarly, the person behind a semi-legitimate nitrous oxide enterprise used his proceeds to set up a legitimate alcohol delivery service.

    Through self-laundering, these modest drug dealers transform their proceeds of crime into spendable cash – and may eventually leave criminality behind altogether.

    The (losing) battle against laundered money

    Across the world, anti-money laundering efforts against organised criminal gangs are notoriously ineffective.

    The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) – an intergovernmental organisation formed in 1999 to combat money laundering and the financing of terrorism – assesses financial regulators’ anti-money laundering controls all over the world. Countries designated as a risk that require monitoring are placed on the task force’s “grey list”, while severe, high-risk countries go on its “black list”. Being put on these lists can result in a withdrawal of international investment and implementation of sanctions by other countries.

    Although developing countries have often scored badly in their assessments, there has been some progress. While Kenya remained on the grey list in 2024, for example, it was found to have strengthened its measures to tackle both money laundering and terrorist financing. In the same year, though, Lebanon was added to the grey list over concerns on both counts.

    The FATF’s evaluation processes are designed to provide an objective assessment of whether a country has implemented its anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing recommendations. However, the success of the FATF’s anti-money laundering controls remains unclear.

    Video: The Financial Action Task Force.

    Often lost in the criminal financing narrative is the role of bulk cash transfers. Even in a world that is moving to cashless transactions, cash generally remains the primary currency of both the illicit drug trade and corruption.

    The biggest and most successful drug traffickers have significant cash reserves which are used to pay workers, replace drugs that are lost or seized, accrue assets, and bribe key officials.

    Reflecting on his former illicit enterprise, Margarito Flores observed: “For every kilo of cocaine or heroin or methamphetamine we sold in the US, at least a kilo of cash went back to Mexico.” For deals in Europe, Flores said: “Given the markup the further away you trade, the amount of cash sent back could be even higher – I would estimate it to be a kilo and a half.”

    Flores described the ineptitude of law enforcement in policing cash that was leaving the US:

    No matter how careful we were, my brother and I lost a handful of loads of drugs heading north [from Mexico into the US]. Heading south was different: we just had the money put on tractor trailers and had it driven it across the border. We never lost a dollar. That’s where politicians don’t pay enough attention. That cash lets traffickers keep doing business.

    Focus on the money as well as the drugs

    So long as demand for illicit drugs exists, the industry will continue – and the revenue it generates will be laundered.

    We believe that to curb the drugs trade, enforcement strategies need to go beyond simply capturing drugs and focus much more on capturing the money. Governments should go after reserves held not only by drug cartels but high-level distributors, such as those who replaced the Flores twins, and also wholesalers. People like these – comparatively high earners in destination countries – are the backbone of the illicit drugs trade.

    Transnational law enforcement should prioritise detecting and seizing bulk cash transfers. These high-volume proceeds underwrite the wellbeing of drug trafficking organisations. Digital tools, such as machine learning and artificial intelligence, can be developed to create new techniques to track and trace suspicious transactions, although they alone won’t solve all laundering problems.

    Corruption of officials also remains a problem. Governments need to ensure their officials are well paid and sufficiently monitored in their roles – be they working in government, border control, banks, police departments or prisons. Unfortunately, the US has shirked its leadership in global anti-corruption efforts with the recent halting of the enforcement of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, which bans the bribing of foreign officials.




    Read more:
    Mexico’s drug corruption has more to do with US demand than crooked politicians


    Anti-money laundering efforts need to be consistently supported and required. Lamentably, the US has undermined its anti-money laundering toolkit by suspending the enforcement of beneficial ownership information reporting requirements. Establishing beneficial ownership helps financial institutions to identify parties that are hiding their financial interests, which can be an indication of money laundering or other criminal activity.

    Similarly, foreign investment in producer countries can strengthen their capacity to counter laundering by supporting intelligence infrastructure and improved training. Recent cuts to USAid and the reduction of US State Department efforts in these areas is another indication that the US will no longer lead in these domains.

    As cash businesses provide an easy mechanism for cleaning money, moving to a cashless society that uses digital transactions may help ensure that money is traceable. At the same time, cryptomarkets provide a minor, but potentially increasing, pathway to hiding dirty money digitally.

    Ultimately, we should recognise the decades-long “war on drugs” for what it is: a policy costing trillions of dollars that combined mass incarceration with insufficient public health investment, and which has harmed the very communities the illicit drug trade affects the most. It is a difficult balance, but the pathway forward needs to reorient the objectives regarding drugs: invest in people, then go after the money that keeps the cartels, distributors and wholesalers afloat.


    For you: more from our Insights series:

    To hear about new Insights articles, join the hundreds of thousands of people who value The Conversation’s evidence-based news. Subscribe to our newsletter.

    Mark Berry received funding from the Dawes Trust for a prestigious PhD scholarship to undertake work that informs the contents of this article.

    R.V. Gundur received funding from the Economic and Social Research Council to undertake work that informs the contents of this article. He is also a professional member of the International Compliance Association.

    The authors wish to thank Margarito Flores Jr (kingpintoeducator.com) for his help with this article.

    ref. Money laundering plays a key role in every part of the illegal drugs industry – here’s how it works – https://theconversation.com/money-laundering-plays-a-key-role-in-every-part-of-the-illegal-drugs-industry-heres-how-it-works-251288

    MIL OSI – Global Reports

  • MIL-OSI: Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc. Reports Q4 and Year-End 2024 Results

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    NEW YORK, March 06, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc. (NASDAQ: SAMG) (the “Company” or “Silvercrest”) today reported the results of its operations for the quarter and year ended December 31, 2024.

    Business Update

    Silvercrest concluded 2024 with strong new client organic flows due to new strategic investments made over the past year that are already bearing fruit. The firm garnered $1.4 billion in Q4 and $1.5 billion during 2024 in new client assets under management (“AUM”) inflows, the best year for new organic client inflows since 2015. The fourth quarter was primarily bolstered by winning a successful seed investment in our new Global Value Equity strategy of $1.3 billion USD ($2.0 billion AUD) in partnership with CBUS, one of Australia’s largest superannuation funds. The increases during the quarter bode well for future revenue, and we remain highly optimistic about securing more significant organic net flows over the course of 2025 to increase our return on invested capital.

    Total AUM as of year-end 2024 reached $36.5 billion as of December 31, 2024, up 9.6% from $33.3 billion at year-end 2023. Discretionary AUM, which drives revenue, rose 6.4% to $23.3 billion from $21.9 billion. Overall, total asset flows and market increases were a net positive for the firm and will drive an increase in future revenue. Revenue for the year increased 5.3% to $123.7 million from $117.4 million, with Q4 revenue up 12.0% over Q4 2023, to $32.0 million from $28.5 million.

    Strategically, in addition to building the firm’s new Global Value Equity strategy, we have hired business development and market leads in Atlanta and Singapore. We have our full MAS license for doing business in Singapore. With significant European assets and growth opportunities, we will be pursuing more initiatives to better highlight Silvercrest in both the institutional and wealth markets. The firm also has invested in talent across the firm to drive new growth and successfully transition the business toward the next generation.

    Silvercrest developed new and stronger institutional consulting relationships during 2024, with new investment opportunities to develop our strategies. Our pipeline remains robust. As a result, we are optimistic about securing significant new organic flows. Importantly, the firm’s pipeline does not yet include mandates for our new Global Value Equity strategy which has a high capacity for significant new assets. We have worked hard over the past year to build the infrastructure, team, and strategy while undertaking business development. As with our third-quarter call, we envision more positive AUM flows and resulting revenue increases.

    As I have discussed throughout the past year, Silvercrest has never had more business opportunities. Those initiatives are beginning to bear results. We have made and will continue to make investments to drive future growth in the business. We expect to make more hires to complement our outstanding professional team to drive that future growth. Silvercrest continues to accrue a higher interim percentage of revenue for compensation for this purpose, and, as mentioned, we will continue to adjust compensation accruals to match these important investments in the business and will keep you informed of our plans and the progress of these investments.

    Fourth Quarter 2024 Highlights

    • Total AUM of $36.5 billion, inclusive of discretionary AUM of $23.3 billion and non-discretionary AUM of $13.2 billion at December 31, 2024.
    • Revenue of $32.0 million.
    • U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) consolidated net income and net income attributable to Silvercrest of $2.7 million and $1.6 million, respectively.
    • Basic and diluted net income per share of $0.17.
    • Adjusted Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization (“EBITDA”)1 of $5.1 million.
    • Adjusted net income1 of $2.9 million.
    • Adjusted basic and diluted earnings per share1,2 of $0.21 and $0.20, respectively.

    The table below presents a comparison of certain GAAP and non-GAAP (“Adjusted”) financial measures and AUM.

       
    For the Three Months

    Ended December 31,
        For the Twelve Months
    Ended December 31,
     
    (in thousands except as indicated)   2024     2023     2024     2023  
    Revenue   $ 31,962     $ 28,542     $ 123,651     $ 117,410  
    Income (loss) before other income (expense), net   $ 1,957     $ (969 )   $ 17,627     $ 18,819  
    Net income (loss)   $ 2,684     $ (642 )   $ 15,709     $ 15,183  
    Net income (loss) margin     8.4 %     (2.2 )%     12.7 %     12.9 %
    Net income (loss) attributable to Silvercrest   $ 1,618     $ (411 )   $ 9,535     $ 9,094  
    Net income (loss) per basic share   $ 0.17     $ (0.05 )   $ 1.00     $ 0.96  
    Net income (loss) per diluted share   $ 0.17     $ (0.04 )   $ 1.00     $ 0.96  
    Adjusted EBITDA1   $ 5,070     $ 2,581     $ 26,101     $ 26,878  
    Adjusted EBITDA Margin1     15.9 %     9.0 %     21.1 %     22.9 %
    Adjusted net income1   $ 2,861     $ 1,049     $ 15,782     $ 16,104  
    Adjusted basic earnings per share1, 2   $ 0.21     $ 0.08     $ 1.15     $ 1.16  
    Adjusted diluted earnings per share1, 2   $ 0.20     $ 0.07     $ 1.10     $ 1.12  
    Assets under management at period end (billions)   $ 36.5     $ 33.3     $ 36.5     $ 33.3  
    Average assets under management (billions)3   $ 35.0     $ 32.3     $ 34.9     $ 31.1  
    Discretionary assets under management (billions)   $ 23.3     $ 21.9     $ 23.3     $ 21.9  
    ___________________
    1 Adjusted measures are non-GAAP measures and are explained and reconciled to the comparable GAAP measures in Exhibits 3 and 4.
    2 Adjusted basic and diluted earnings per share measures for the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2024 are based on the number of shares of Class A common stock and Class B common stock outstanding as of December 31, 2024. Adjusted diluted earnings per share are further based on the addition of unvested restricted stock units and non-qualified stock options to the extent dilutive at the end of the reporting period.
    3 We have computed average AUM by averaging AUM at the beginning of the applicable period and AUM at the end of the applicable period.


    AUM at $36.5 Billion

    Silvercrest’s discretionary assets under management increased by $1.4 billion, or 6.4%, to $23.3 billion at December 31, 2024, from $21.9 billion at December 31, 2023. The increase was attributable to market appreciation of $2.1 billion partially offset by net client outflows of $0.7 billion. Silvercrest’s total AUM increased by $3.2 billion, or 9.6%, to $36.5 billion at December 31, 2024, from $33.3 billion at December 31, 2023. The increase was attributable to market appreciation of $3.8 billion partially offset by net client outflows of $0.6 billion.

    Silvercrest’s discretionary assets under management increased by $0.7 billion, or 3.1%, to $23.3 billion at December 31, 2024, from $22.6 billion at September 30, 2024. The increase was attributable to net client inflows of $0.9 billion partially offset by market depreciation of $0.2 billion. Silvercrest’s total AUM increased by $1.4 billion, or 4.0%, to $36.5 billion at December 31, 2024, from $35.1 billion at September 30, 2024. The increase was attributable to market appreciation of $0.5 billion and net client inflows of $0.9 billion.

    Fourth Quarter 2024 vs. Fourth Quarter 2023

    Revenue increased by $3.4 million, or 12.0%, to $32.0 million for the three months ended December 31, 2024, from $28.5 million for the three months ended December 31, 2023. This increase was driven by net client inflows in discretionary assets under management partially offset by market depreciation.

    Total expenses increased by $0.5 million, or 1.7%, to $30.0 million for the three months ended December 31, 2024, from $29.5 million for the three months ended December 31, 2023. Compensation and benefits expense decreased by $0.8 million, or 3.4%, to $21.9 million for the three months ended December 31, 2024, from $22.7 million for the three months ended December 31, 2023. The decrease was primarily attributable to a decrease in bonuses of $1.7 million, partially offset by increases in salaries and benefits of $0.9 million primarily as a result of merit-based increases and newly hired staff. General and administrative expenses increased by $1.3 million, or 18.5%, to $8.1 million for the three months ended December 31, 2024, from $6.8 million for the three months ended December 31, 2023. This was primarily attributable to increases in portfolio and systems expense of $0.5 million, office expense of $0.2 million, recruiting costs of $0.1 million and professional fees of $0.5 million.

    Consolidated net income was $2.7 million for the three months ended December 31, 2024, as compared to consolidated net loss of $0.6 million for the same period in the prior year. Net income attributable to Silvercrest was $1.6 million, or $0.17 per basic and diluted share, for the three months ended December 31, 2024. Our Adjusted Net Income1 was $2.9 million, or $0.21 per adjusted basic share and $0.20 per adjusted diluted share,2 for the three months ended December 31, 2024.

    Adjusted EBITDA1 was $5.1 million, or 15.9% of revenue, for the three months ended December 31, 2024, as compared to $2.6 million or 9.0% of revenue for the same period in the prior year.

    Year Ended December 31, 2024 vs. Year Ended December 31, 2023

    Revenue increased by $6.2 million, or 5.3%, to $123.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, from $117.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2023. This increase was driven by market appreciation in discretionary assets under management partially offset by net client outflows.

    Total expenses increased by $7.4 million, or 7.5%, to $106.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, from $98.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2024. Compensation and benefits expense increased by $4.0 million, or 5.6%, to $76.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, from $72.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2023. The increase was primarily attributable to an increase in equity based compensation expense of $0.3 million due to an increase in the number of unvested restricted stock units and unvested non-qualified stock options outstanding, an increase in salaries and benefits expense of $2.5 million primarily as a result of merit-based increases and newly hired staff and an increase in the accrual for bonuses of $1.2 million. General and administrative expenses increased by $3.4 million, or 13.1%, to $29.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, from $26.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2023. The increase was primarily attributable to increases in professional fees of $1.1 million, portfolio and systems expenses of $0.8 million, occupancy and related costs of $0.3 million, trading errors of $0.3 million, recruiting expenses of $0.3 million, travel and entertainment expenses of $0.2 million, depreciation and amortization of $0.1 million, office expense of $0.1 million, publications and subscriptions costs of $0.1 million and sub-advisory and referral fees of $0.1 million. 

    Consolidated net income was $15.7 million, or 12.7% of revenue, for the year ended December 31, 2024, as compared to consolidated net income of $15.2 million, or 12.9% of revenue, for the same period in the prior year. Net income attributable to Silvercrest was $9.5 million, or $1.00 per basic and diluted share, for the year ended December 31, 2024. Our Adjusted Net Income1 was $15.8 million, or $1.15 per adjusted basic share and $1.10 per adjusted diluted share,2 for the year ended December 31, 2024.

    Adjusted EBITDA1 was $26.1 million, or 21.1% of revenue, for the year ended December 31, 2024, as compared to $26.9 million, or 22.9% of revenue, for the same period in the prior year.

    Liquidity and Capital Resources

    Cash and cash equivalents were $68.6 million at December 31, 2024, compared to $70.3 million at December 31, 2023. As of December 31, 2024, there was nothing outstanding under our term loan with City National Bank and nothing outstanding on our revolving credit facility with City National Bank.

    Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc.’s total equity was $80.7 million at December 31, 2024. We had 9,376,280 shares of Class A common stock outstanding and 4,373,315 shares of Class B common stock outstanding at December 31, 2024.

    Non-GAAP Financial Measures

    To provide investors with additional insight, promote transparency and allow for a more comprehensive understanding of the information used by management in its financial and operational decision-making, we supplement our consolidated financial statements presented on a basis consistent with GAAP with Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA Margin, Adjusted Net Income and Adjusted Earnings Per Share, which are non-GAAP financial measures of earnings. These adjustments, and the non-GAAP financial measures that are derived from them, provide supplemental information to analyze our operations between periods and over time. Investors should consider our non-GAAP financial measures in addition to, and not as a substitute for, financial measures prepared in accordance with GAAP.

    • EBITDA represents net income before provision for income taxes, interest income, interest expense, depreciation and amortization.
    • We define Adjusted EBITDA as EBITDA without giving effect to the Delaware franchise tax, professional fees associated with acquisitions or financing transactions, gains on extinguishment of debt or other obligations related to acquisitions, impairment charges and losses on disposals or abandonment of assets and leaseholds, client reimbursements and fund redemption costs, severance and other similar expenses, but including partner incentive allocations, prior to our initial public offering, as an expense. We believe that it is important to management and investors to supplement our consolidated financial statements presented on a GAAP basis with Adjusted EBITDA, a non-GAAP financial measure of earnings, as this measure provides a perspective of recurring earnings of the Company, taking into account earnings attributable to both Class A and Class B stockholders.
    • Adjusted EBITDA Margin is calculated by dividing Adjusted EBITDA by total revenue. We believe that it is important to management and investors to supplement our consolidated financial statements presented on a GAAP basis with Adjusted EBITDA Margin, a non-GAAP financial measure of earnings, as this measure provides a perspective of recurring profitability of the Company, taking into account profitability attributable to both Class A and Class B stockholders.
    • Adjusted Net Income represents recurring net income without giving effect to professional fees associated with acquisitions or financing transactions, losses on forgiveness of notes receivable from our principals, gains on extinguishment of debt or other obligations related to acquisitions, impairment charges and losses on disposals or abandonment of assets and leaseholds, client reimbursements and fund redemption costs, severance and other similar expenses, but including partner incentive allocations, prior to our initial public offering, as an expense. Furthermore, Adjusted Net Income includes income tax expense assuming a blended corporate rate of 26%. We believe that it is important to management and investors to supplement our consolidated financial statements presented on a GAAP basis with Adjusted Net Income, a non-GAAP financial measure of earnings, as this measure provides a perspective of recurring income of the Company, taking into account income attributable to both Class A and Class B stockholders.
    • Adjusted Earnings Per Share represents Adjusted Net Income divided by the actual Class A and Class B shares outstanding as of the end of the reporting period for basic Adjusted Earnings Per Share, and to the extent dilutive, we add unvested restricted stock units and non-qualified stock options to the total shares outstanding to compute diluted Adjusted Earnings Per Share. As a result of our structure, which includes a non-controlling interest, we believe that it is important to management and investors to supplement our consolidated financial statements presented on a GAAP basis with Adjusted Earnings Per Share, a non-GAAP financial measure of earnings, as this measure provides a perspective of recurring earnings per share of the Company as a whole as opposed to being limited to our Class A common stock.

    Conference Call

    The Company will host a conference call on March 7, 2025, at 8:30 am (Eastern Time) to discuss these results. Hosting the call will be Richard R. Hough III, Chief Executive Officer and President, and Scott A. Gerard, Chief Financial Officer. Listeners may access the call by dialing 1-844-836-8743 or for international listeners the call may be accessed by dialing 1-412-317-5723. A live, listen-only webcast will also be available via the investor relations section of www.silvercrestgroup.com. An archived replay of the call will be available after the completion of the live call on the Investor Relations page of the Silvercrest website at http://ir.silvercrestgroup.com/.

    Forward-Looking Statements

    This release contains, and from time to time our management may make, forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, each as amended. For those statements, we claim the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions. These statements are only predictions based on our current expectations and projections about future events. Important factors that could cause actual results, level of activity, performance or achievements to differ materially from those indicated by such forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to: incurrence of net losses; fluctuations in quarterly and annual results; adverse economic or market conditions; our expectations with respect to future levels of assets under management, inflows and outflows; our ability to retain clients; our ability to maintain our fee structure; our particular choices with regard to investment strategies employed; our ability to hire and retain qualified investment professionals; the cost of complying with current and future regulation coupled with the cost of defending ourselves from related investigations or litigation; failure of our operational safeguards against breaches in data security, privacy, conflicts of interest or employee misconduct; our expected tax rate; our expectations with respect to deferred tax assets, adverse economic or market conditions; incurrence of net losses; adverse effects of management focusing on implementation of a growth strategy; failure to develop and maintain the Silvercrest brand; and other factors disclosed under “Risk Factors” in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023, which is accessible on the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s website at www.sec.gov. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or review any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise, except as required by law.

    About Silvercrest

    Silvercrest was founded in April 2002 as an independent, employee-owned registered investment adviser. With offices in New York, Boston, Virginia, New Jersey, California and Wisconsin, Silvercrest provides traditional and alternative investment advisory and family office services to wealthy families and select institutional investors.

    Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc.

    Contact: Richard Hough
    212-649-0601
    rhough@silvercrestgroup.com

     
    Exhibit 1
     
    Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc.
    Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
    (Unaudited and in thousands, except share and per share amounts or as noted)
     
        Year Ended December 31,  
        2024     2023  
        (Unaudited)        
    Revenue            
    Management and advisory fees   $ 119,316     $ 112,794  
    Family office services     4,335       4,616  
    Total revenue     123,651       117,410  
    Expenses            
    Compensation and benefits     76,663       72,619  
    General and administrative     29,361       25,972  
    Total expenses     106,024       98,591  
    Income before other (expense) income, net     17,627       18,819  
    Other (expense) income, net            
    Other (expense) income, net     203       76  
    Interest income     1,432       946  
    Interest expense     (144 )     (421 )
    Equity income from investments     1,154       73  
    Total other (expense) income, net     2,645       674  
    Income before provision for income taxes     20,272       19,493  
    Provision for income taxes     (4,563 )     (4,310 )
    Net income     15,709       15,183  
    Less: net income attributable to non-controlling interests     (6,174 )     (6,089 )
    Net income attributable to Silvercrest   $ 9,535     $ 9,094  
    Net income per share:            
    Basic   $ 1.00     $ 0.96  
    Diluted   $ 1.00     $ 0.96  
    Weighted average shares outstanding:            
    Basic     9,495,375       9,431,404  
    Diluted     9,532,525       9,464,339  
     
    Exhibit 2
    Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc.
    Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
    (Unaudited and in thousands, except share and per share amounts or as noted)
     
        For the Three Months Ended December 31,  
        2024     2023  
        (Unaudited)        
    Revenue            
    Management and advisory fees   $ 30,871     $ 27,349  
    Family office services     1,091       1,193  
    Total revenue     31,962       28,542  
    Expenses            
    Compensation and benefits     21,903       22,674  
    General and administrative     8,102       6,837  
    Total expenses     30,005       29,511  
    Income (loss) income before other income (expense), net     1,957       (969 )
    Other income (expense), net            
    Other income (expense), net     178       45  
    Interest income     422       525  
    Interest expense     (49 )     (107 )
    Equity income from investments     1,154       73  
    Total other income (expense), net     1,705       536  
    Income (loss) before provision for income taxes     3,662       (433 )
    Provision for income taxes     (978 )     (209 )
    Net income (loss)     2,684       (642 )
    Less: net (income) loss attributable to non-controlling interests     (1,066 )     231  
    Net income (loss) attributable to Silvercrest   $ 1,618     $ (411 )
    Net income (loss) per share:            
    Basic   $ 0.17     $ (0.05 )
    Diluted   $ 0.17     $ (0.04 )
    Weighted average shares outstanding:            
    Basic     9,450,344       9,368,579  
    Diluted     9,487,453       9,368,579  
     
    Exhibit 3
    Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc.
    Reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP (“Adjusted”) Adjusted EBITDA Measure
    (Unaudited and in thousands, except share and per share amounts or as noted)
     
    Adjusted EBITDA   For the Three Months
    Ended December 31,
        For the Year
    Ended December 31,
     
        2024     2023     2024     2023  
    Reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measure:                        
    Net (loss) income   $ 2,684     $ (642 )   $ 15,709     $ 15,183  
    Provision for income taxes     978       209       4,563       4,310  
    Delaware Franchise Tax     50       50       200       200  
    Interest expense     49       107       144       421  
    Interest income     (422 )     (525 )     (1,432 )     (946 )
    Depreciation and amortization     1,035       1,002       4,146       4,014  
    Equity-based compensation     542       580       1,916       1,627  
    Other adjustments (A)     154       1,800       855       2,069  
    Adjusted EBITDA   $ 5,070     $ 2,581     $ 26,101     $ 26,878  
    Adjusted EBITDA Margin     15.9 %     9.0 %     21.1 %     22.9 %

    (A) Other adjustments consist of the following:

        Three Months Ended
    December 31,
        Twelve Months Ended
    December 31,
        2024     2023     2024     2023
    Acquisition costs (a)   $       $       $       $ 5  
    Severance     140         52         393         71  
    Other (b)     14         1,748         462         1,993  
    Total other adjustments   $ 154       $ 1,800       $ 855       $ 2,069  
    (a) For the twelve months ended December 31, 2023, represents professional fees of $5 related to the acquisition of Cortina.
    (b) For the three months ended December 31, 2024, represents a Tax Receivable Agreement adjustment of ($78), an ASC 842 rent adjustment of $48 related to the amortization of property lease incentives, software implementation costs of $4, professional fees related to a transfer pricing project of $27 and data conversion costs of $13. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2024, represents a fair value adjustment to the Neosho contingent purchase price consideration of $12, an ASC 842 rent adjustment of $192 related to the amortization of property lease incentives, a Tax Receivable Agreement adjustment of ($78), sign on bonuses paid to certain employees of $188, professional fees of $53 related to a transfer pricing project, legal fees of $46, data conversion costs of $27 and software implementation costs of $22. For the three months ended December 31, 2023, represents a variable compensation payment of $1,667 related to the difference between the number of non-qualified stock options granted to an existing Class B unit holder as determined using the Black-Scholes method inclusive and exclusive of the expected annual dividend yield input, a Tax Receivable Agreement adjustment of ($38), an ASC 842 rent adjustment of $48 related to the amortization of property lease incentives, software implementation costs of $7, a fair value adjustment to the Neosho contingent purchase price consideration of $24, professional fees related to a transfer pricing project of $37 and legal fees related to the startup of a fund of $2. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2023, represents a variable compensation payment of $1,667 related to the difference between the number of non-qualified stock options granted to an existing Class B unit holder as determined using the Black-Scholes method inclusive and exclusive of the expected annual dividend yield input,  a Tax Receivable Agreement adjustment of $2, an ASC 842 rent adjustment of $192 related to the amortization of property lease incentives, moving costs of $35, software implementation costs of $35, professional fees related to a transfer pricing project of $37, legal fees related to the startup of a fund of $2, a fair value adjustment to the Neosho contingent purchase price consideration of $24 and a fair value adjustment to the Cortina contingent purchase price consideration of ($2).
     
    Exhibit 4
    Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc.
    Reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP (“Adjusted”)
    Adjusted Net Income and Adjusted Earnings Per Share Measures
    (Unaudited and in thousands, except per share amounts or as noted)
     
    Adjusted Net Income and Adjusted Earnings Per Share   Three Months Ended
    December 31,
        Year Ended
    December 31,
     
        2024     2023     2024     2023  
    Reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measure:                        
    Net income (loss)   $ 2,684     $ (642 )   $ 15,709     $ 15,183  
    Consolidated GAAP Provision for income taxes     978       209       4,563       4,310  
    Delaware Franchise Tax     50       50       200       200  
    Other adjustments (A)     154       1,800       855       2,069  
    Adjusted earnings before provision for income taxes     3,866       1,417       21,327       21,762  
    Adjusted provision for income taxes:                        
    Adjusted provision for income taxes (26% assumed tax rate)     (1,005 )     (368 )     (5,545 )     (5,658 )
                             
    Adjusted net income   $ 2,861     $ 1,049     $ 15,782     $ 16,104  
                             
    GAAP net income (loss) per share (B):                        
    Basic   $ 0.17     $ (0.05 )   $ 1.00     $ 0.96  
    Diluted   $ 0.17     $ (0.04 )   $ 1.00     $ 0.96  
                             
    Adjusted earnings per share/unit (B):                        
    Basic   $ 0.21     $ 0.08     $ 1.15     $ 1.16  
    Diluted   $ 0.20     $ 0.07     $ 1.10     $ 1.12  
                             
    Shares/units outstanding:                        
    Basic Class A shares outstanding     9,376       9,479       9,376       9,479  
    Basic Class B shares/units outstanding     4,373       4,431       4,373       4,431  
    Total basic shares/units outstanding     13,750       13,910       13,750       13,910  
                             
    Diluted Class A shares outstanding (C)     9,413       9,515       9,413       9,515  
    Diluted Class B shares/units outstanding (D)     4,945       4,820       4,945       4,820  
    Total diluted shares/units outstanding     14,358       14,335       14,358       14,335  
    (A) See A in Exhibit 3.
    (B) GAAP earnings per share is strictly attributable to Class A stockholders. Adjusted earnings per share takes into account earnings attributable to both Class A and Class B stockholders.
    (C) Includes 37,109 and 35,554 unvested restricted stock units at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively.
    (D) Includes 205,079 and 240,998 unvested restricted stock units at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively, and 366,293 and 147,506 unvested non-qualified options at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively.
     
    Exhibit 5
    Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc.
    Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition
    (Unaudited and in thousands)
     
        December 31,
    2024
        December 31,
    2023
     
    Assets            
    Cash and cash equivalents   $ 68,611     $ 70,301  
    Investments     1,354       219  
    Receivables, net     12,225       9,526  
    Due from Silvercrest Funds     945       558  
    Furniture, equipment and leasehold improvements, net     7,387       7,422  
    Goodwill     63,675       63,675  
    Operating lease assets     16,032       19,612  
    Finance lease assets     254       330  
    Intangible assets, net     16,644       18,933  
    Deferred tax asset     4,220       5,034  
    Prepaid expenses and other assets     3,085       3,964  
    Total assets   $ 194,432     $ 199,574  
    Liabilities and Equity            
    Accounts payable and accrued expenses   $ 1,953     $ 1,990  
    Accrued compensation     39,865       37,371  
    Borrowings under credit facility           2,719  
    Operating lease liabilities     22,270       26,277  
    Finance lease liabilities     262       336  
    Deferred tax and other liabilities     10,389       9,071  
    Total liabilities     74,739       77,764  
    Commitments and Contingencies (Note 10)            
    Equity            
    Preferred Stock, par value $0.01, 10,000,000 shares authorized; none issued and outstanding            
    Class A Common Stock, par value $0.01, 50,000,000 shares authorized; 10,450,559
    and 9,376,280 issued and outstanding, respectively, as of December 31, 2024;
    10,287,452 and 9,478,997 issued and outstanding, respectively, as of December 31, 2023
        104       103  
    Class B Common Stock, par value $0.01, 25,000,000 shares authorized; 4,373,315
    and 4,431,105 issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively
        42       43  
    Additional Paid-In Capital     56,369       55,809  
    Treasury stock, at cost, 1,074,279 and 808,455 shares as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively     (19,728 )     (15,057 )
    Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)     (43 )     (12 )
    Retained earnings     43,953       41,851  
    Total Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc.’s equity     80,697       82,737  
    Non-controlling interests     38,996       39,073  
    Total equity     119,693       121,810  
    Total liabilities and equity   $ 194,432     $ 199,574  
     
    Exhibit 6
    Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc.
    Total Assets Under Management
    (Unaudited and in billions)
     
    Total Assets Under Management:
     
        Three Months Ended
    December 31,
        % Change from December 31,  
        2024     2023     2023  
    Beginning assets under management   $ 35.1     $ 31.2       12.5 %
                       
    Gross client inflows     2.2       0.9       144.4 %
    Gross client outflows     (1.3 )     (1.3 )     0.0 %
    Net client flows     0.9       (0.4 )     325.0 %
                       
    Market appreciation     0.5       2.5       -80.0 %
    Ending assets under management   $ 36.5     $ 33.3       9.6 %
        Year Ended
    December 31,
        % Change from December 31,  
        2024     2023     2023  
    Beginning assets under management   $ 33.3     $ 28.9       15.2 %
                       
    Gross client inflows     5.1       5.4       -5.6 %
    Gross client outflows     (5.7 )     (4.8 )     18.8 %
    Net client flows     (0.6 )     0.6       -200.0 %
                       
    Market appreciation     3.8       3.8       0.0 %
    Ending assets under management   $ 36.5     $ 33.3       9.6 %
     
    Exhibit 7
    Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc.
    Discretionary Assets Under Management
    (Unaudited and in billions)
     
    Discretionary Assets Under Management:
     
        Three Months Ended
    December 31,
        % Change from December 31,  
        2024     2023     2023  
    Beginning assets under management   $ 22.6     $ 20.5       10.2 %
                       
    Gross client inflows     1.8       0.7       157.1 %
    Gross client outflows     (0.9 )     (1.1 )     -18.2 %
    Net client flows     0.9       (0.4 )     325.0 %
                       
    Market (depreciation) appreciation     (0.2 )     1.8       -111.1 %
    Ending assets under management   $ 23.3     $ 21.9       6.4 %
        Twelve Months Ended
    December 31,
        % Change from December 31,  
        2024     2023     2023  
    Beginning assets under management   $ 21.9     $ 20.9       4.8 %
                       
    Gross client inflows     3.9       3.0       30.0 %
    Gross client outflows     (4.6 )     (4.1 )     12.2 %
    Net client flows     (0.7 )     (1.1 )     36.4 %
                       
    Market appreciation     2.1       2.1       0.0 %
    Ending assets under management   $ 23.3     $ 21.9       6.4 %
    Exhibit 8
    Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc.
    Non-Discretionary Assets Under Management
    (Unaudited and in billions)
     
    Non-Discretionary Assets Under Management:
     
        Three Months Ended
    December 31,
        % Change from December 31,  
        2024     2023     2023  
    Beginning assets under management   $ 12.5     $ 10.7       16.8 %
                       
    Gross client inflows     0.4       0.2       100.0 %
    Gross client outflows     (0.4 )     (0.2 )     100.0 %
    Net client flows                 0.0 %
                       
    Market appreciation     0.7       0.7       0.0 %
    Ending assets under management   $ 13.2     $ 11.4       15.8 %
        Twelve Months Ended
    December 31,
        % Change from December 31,  
        2024     2023     2023  
    Beginning assets under management   $ 11.4     $ 8.0       42.5 %
                       
    Gross client inflows     1.2       2.4       -50.0 %
    Gross client outflows     (1.1 )     (0.7 )     57.1 %
    Net client flows     0.1       1.7       -94.1 %
                       
    Market appreciation     1.7       1.7       0.0 %
    Ending assets under management   $ 13.2     $ 11.4       15.8 %
     
    Exhibit 9
    Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc.
    Assets Under Management
    (Unaudited and in billions)
     
        Three Months Ended
    December 31,
     
        2024     2023  
    Total AUM as of September 30,   $ 35.088     $ 31.187  
    Discretionary AUM:            
    Total Discretionary AUM as of September 30,   $ 22.639     $ 20.462  
    New client accounts/assets (1)     1.370       0.188  
    Closed accounts (2)     (0.011 )     (0.103 )
    Net cash inflow/(outflow) (3)     (0.458 )     (0.479 )
    Non-discretionary to Discretionary AUM (4)     (0.012 )     (0.002 )
    Market appreciation     (0.209 )     1.819  
    Change to Discretionary AUM     0.680       1.423  
    Total Discretionary AUM at December 31,     23.319       21.885  
    Change to Non-Discretionary AUM (5)     0.687       0.671  
    Total AUM as of December 31,   $ 36.455     $ 33.281  
       
    Twelve Months Ended

    December 31,
     
        2024     2023  
    Total AUM as of January 1,   $ 33.281     $ 28.905  
    Discretionary AUM:            
    Total Discretionary AUM as of January 1,   $ 21.885     $ 20.851  
    New client accounts/assets (1)     1.549       0.339  
    Closed accounts (2)     (0.527 )     (0.202 )
    Net cash inflow/(outflow) (3)     (1.714 )     (1.272 )
    Non-discretionary to Discretionary AUM (4)     (0.018 )     (0.032 )
    Market (depreciation)/appreciation     2.144       2.201  
    Change to Discretionary AUM     1.434       1.034  
    Total Discretionary AUM at December 31,     23.319       21.885  
    Change to Non-Discretionary AUM (5)     1.740       3.342  
    Total AUM as of December 31,   $ 36.455     $ 33.281  
    (1) Represents new account flows from both new and existing client relationships.
    (2) Represents closed accounts of existing client relationships and those that terminated.
    (3) Represents periodic cash flows related to existing accounts.
    (4) Represents client assets that converted to Discretionary AUM from Non-Discretionary AUM.
    (5) Represents the net change to Non-Discretionary AUM.
     
    Exhibit 10
    Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc.
    Equity Investment Strategy Composite Performance1, 2
    As of December 31, 2024
    (Unaudited)
     
    PROPRIETARY EQUITY PERFORMANCE 1, 2   ANNUALIZED PERFORMANCE  
        INCEPTION   1-YEAR     3-YEAR     5-YEAR     7-YEAR     INCEPTION  
    Large Cap Value Composite   4/1/02     16.3       5.1       10.8       10.6       9.7  
    Russell 1000 Value Index         14.4       5.6       8.7       8.4       7.9  
                                       
    Small Cap Value Composite   4/1/02     10.1       4.3       8.8       7.1       10.3  
    Russell 2000 Value Index         8.1       1.9       7.3       6.1       7.9  
                                       
    Smid Cap Value Composite   10/1/05     15.7       2.6       7.6       7.0       9.5  
    Russell 2500 Value Index         11.0       3.8       8.4       7.2       7.8  
                                       
    Multi Cap Value Composite   7/1/02     16.1       2.6       9.2       8.5       9.7  
    Russell 3000 Value Index         14.0       5.4       8.6       8.3       8.4  
                                       
    Equity Income Composite   12/1/03     10.4       3.1       6.7       7.4       10.8  
    Russell 3000 Value Index         14.0       5.4       8.6       8.3       8.5  
                                       
    Focused Value Composite   9/1/04     16.7       (0.2 )     5.6       5.4       9.4  
    Russell 3000 Value Index         14.0       5.4       8.6       8.3       8.3  
                                       
    Small Cap Opportunity Composite   7/1/04     14.9       4.5       10.3       10.1       11.0  
    Russell 2000 Index         11.5       1.2       7.4       6.9       8.1  
                                       
    Small Cap Growth Composite   7/1/04     13.6       (2.9 )     11.1       11.8       10.6  
    Russell 2000 Growth Index         15.2       0.2       6.9       7.2       8.5  
                                       
    Smid Cap Growth Composite   1/1/06     20.9       (3.2 )     12.6       14.2       11.1  
    Russell 2500 Growth Index         13.9       0.0       8.1       8.8       9.5  
    1 Returns are based upon a time weighted rate of return of various fully discretionary equity portfolios with similar investment objectives, strategies and policies and other relevant criteria managed by Silvercrest Asset Management Group LLC (“SAMG LLC”), a subsidiary of Silvercrest. Performance results are gross of fees and net of commission charges. An investor’s actual return will be reduced by the advisory fees and any other expenses it may incur in the management of the investment advisory account. SAMG LLC’s standard advisory fees are described in Part 2 of its Form ADV. Actual fees and expenses will vary depending on a variety of factors, including the size of a particular account. Returns greater than one year are shown as annualized compounded returns and include gains and accrued income and reinvestment of distributions. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. This piece contains no recommendations to buy or sell securities or a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell securities or investment services or adopt any investment position. This piece is not intended to constitute investment advice and is based upon conditions in place during the period noted. Market and economic views are subject to change without notice and may be untimely when presented here. Readers are advised not to infer or assume that any securities, sectors or markets described were or will be profitable. SAMG LLC is an independent investment advisory and financial services firm created to meet the investment and administrative needs of individuals with substantial assets and select institutional investors. SAMG LLC claims compliance with the Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS®).
    2 The market indices used to compare to the performance of Silvercrest’s strategies are as follows:
      The Russell 1000 Index is a capitalization-weighted, unmanaged index that measures the 1000 largest companies in the Russell 3000. The Russell 1000 Value Index is a capitalization-weighted, unmanaged index that includes those Russell 1000 Index companies with lower price-to-book ratios and lower expected growth values.
      The Russell 2000 Index is a capitalization-weighted, unmanaged index that measures the 2000 smallest companies in the Russell 3000. The Russell 2000 Value Index is a capitalization-weighted, unmanaged index that includes those Russell 2000 Index companies with lower price-to-book ratios and lower expected growth values.
      The Russell 2500 Index is a capitalization-weighted, unmanaged index that measures the 2500 smallest companies in the Russell 3000. The Russell 2500 Value Index is a capitalization-weighted, unmanaged index that includes those Russell 2000 Index companies with lower price-to-book ratios and lower expected growth values.
      The Russell 3000 Value Index is a capitalization-weighted, unmanaged index that measures those Russell 3000 Index companies with lower price-to-book ratios and lower forecasted growth.

    The MIL Network