NewzIntel.com

Category: Crime

  • MIL-OSI Security: Five Co-Conspirators Plead Guilty to Smuggling Contraband Into the D.C. Jail

    Source: US FBI

               WASHINGTON – LaTara Brown, 31, of Capitol Heights, Maryland, Kiya Holland, 33, of Oxon Hill, Maryland, Darius Robertson, 31, of Washington, D.C., Marcel Vines, 28, of Washington, D.C., and Stefon Freshley, 28 of Washington, D.C. have all pleaded guilty in a conspiracy to provide a knife, cell phones, and fentanyl and other controlled substances to inmates in the D.C. jail as they awaited trial for murder and assault with intent to kill while armed. The pleas were announced by U.S. Attorney Jeanine Ferris Pirro.

               Brown, Holland, Robertson, Vines and Freshley pleaded guilty in District Court. They were previously indicted on November 14, 2024 for providing or possessing contraband in a prison, as well as conspiring to do so. The sixth co-conspirator, Rashaad Roper, 45, of Gaithersburg, MD is set to go to trial.

               As part of the plea, Brown, Holland, Robertson, Vines and Freshley admitted to their role in the conspiracy which included Holland and Brown admitting to packaging contraband, such as a knife, cell phones, and controlled substances to include fentanyl, into Tupperware containers which would then be brought to the Central Detention Facility, also known as the D.C. Jail. Robertson, Vines, and/or Freshley, who were inmates inside the housing unit, admitted to receiving the contraband from Officer Roper or another corrections officer after they were smuggled into the jail.

                Sentencings are scheduled for August 13, 2025 (Vines), September 5, 2025 (Holland), September 16, 2025 (Robertson), September 25, 2025 (Freshley), and October 21, 2025 (Brown). Each defendant faces a statutory maximum sentence of 5 years in prison for conspiracy to provide or possess contraband in a prison. Judge Timothy J. Kelly will determine the appropriate sentence at each of the respective sentencings. 

               Joining in the announcement was FBI Washington Field Office Criminal Division Special Agent in Charge Reid Davis and Chief Investigator Kevin L. Hammond of the D.C. Department of Corrections Office of Investigative Services.

               This case was investigated by the FBI’s Washington Field Office and the D.C. Department of Corrections Office of Investigative Services with the assistance of the Department of Justice Office of Inspector General. It is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorneys Joshua Gold and Sarah Santiago.

    MIL Security OSI –

  • MIL-OSI Security: Five Co-Conspirators Plead Guilty to Smuggling Contraband Into the D.C. Jail

    Source: US FBI

               WASHINGTON – LaTara Brown, 31, of Capitol Heights, Maryland, Kiya Holland, 33, of Oxon Hill, Maryland, Darius Robertson, 31, of Washington, D.C., Marcel Vines, 28, of Washington, D.C., and Stefon Freshley, 28 of Washington, D.C. have all pleaded guilty in a conspiracy to provide a knife, cell phones, and fentanyl and other controlled substances to inmates in the D.C. jail as they awaited trial for murder and assault with intent to kill while armed. The pleas were announced by U.S. Attorney Jeanine Ferris Pirro.

               Brown, Holland, Robertson, Vines and Freshley pleaded guilty in District Court. They were previously indicted on November 14, 2024 for providing or possessing contraband in a prison, as well as conspiring to do so. The sixth co-conspirator, Rashaad Roper, 45, of Gaithersburg, MD is set to go to trial.

               As part of the plea, Brown, Holland, Robertson, Vines and Freshley admitted to their role in the conspiracy which included Holland and Brown admitting to packaging contraband, such as a knife, cell phones, and controlled substances to include fentanyl, into Tupperware containers which would then be brought to the Central Detention Facility, also known as the D.C. Jail. Robertson, Vines, and/or Freshley, who were inmates inside the housing unit, admitted to receiving the contraband from Officer Roper or another corrections officer after they were smuggled into the jail.

                Sentencings are scheduled for August 13, 2025 (Vines), September 5, 2025 (Holland), September 16, 2025 (Robertson), September 25, 2025 (Freshley), and October 21, 2025 (Brown). Each defendant faces a statutory maximum sentence of 5 years in prison for conspiracy to provide or possess contraband in a prison. Judge Timothy J. Kelly will determine the appropriate sentence at each of the respective sentencings. 

               Joining in the announcement was FBI Washington Field Office Criminal Division Special Agent in Charge Reid Davis and Chief Investigator Kevin L. Hammond of the D.C. Department of Corrections Office of Investigative Services.

               This case was investigated by the FBI’s Washington Field Office and the D.C. Department of Corrections Office of Investigative Services with the assistance of the Department of Justice Office of Inspector General. It is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorneys Joshua Gold and Sarah Santiago.

    MIL Security OSI –

  • MIL-OSI: 1-Hour Payday Loans No Credit Check: GreendayOnline Expands Digital Services to Serve 32 States Where Traditional Lending Remains Legal

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Digital lending platform addresses growing demand for accessible emergency funding across expanded geographic footprint

    Dallas, Texas , July 31, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — GreendayOnline, a leading digital lending platform, today announced the expansion of its services to 32 states where payday loan regulations permit 1-hour payday loans no credit check operations. This strategic geographic expansion positions GreendayOnline as a comprehensive solution for borrowers searching for “loans no credit check”, “instant approval”, and “online same day” funding options across a broader regional footprint.

    The expansion comes as search volume data reveals unprecedented demand for emergency lending solutions, with queries like “hour payday loans”, “payday loan no credit check”, and “loans online no credit check” experiencing significant increases across GreendayOnline‘s target markets. Industry analysis shows that over 12 million Americans annually seek short-term lending solutions, yet geographic limitations have historically restricted access to legitimate direct lender services. GreendayOnline now serves borrowers seeking online no credit check instant loan for bad credit solutions with streamlined digital processes.

    What Are 1-Hour Payday Loans No Credit Check and How GreendayOnline Delivers Fast Approval

    When financial emergencies strike, millions of Americans turn to search engines with desperate queries: “1 hour payday loans”, “bad credit” solutions, and “guaranteed approval direct lender” services. Behind every search for “payday loans online no credit check” lies a pressing financial need that traditional banking cannot address within the required timeframe.

    Understanding One Hour Payday Loans with Instant Approval Mechanism

    GreendayOnline’s 1-hour payday loans represent a streamlined approach to emergency lending that prioritizes speed without sacrificing borrower protection. Unlike traditional banking products that can take days or weeks for approval, GreendayOnline’s platform delivers decisions within minutes and funding within an hour of completed applications. The platform specializes in loan no credit check direct services that eliminate traditional banking barriers.

    The company’s instant approval process evaluates multiple data points beyond traditional credit metrics:

    1. Income verification through bank account analysis
    2. Employment stability assessment
    3. Debt-to-income ratio calculations
    4. Previous lending history evaluation
    5. Real-time affordability analysis

    “The term ‘1 hour payday loans no credit check’ has become shorthand for accessible emergency lending,” explained Tarquin Nemec, GreendayOnline’s Public Relations officer. “Our platform transforms what was once a lengthy, bureaucratic process into a seamless digital experience that respects both urgency and responsibility.”

    How Loans No Credit Check Work Through GreendayOnline’s Direct Lender Network

    The concept of “loans with no credit check direct lender” often confuses borrowers who assume their credit score is irrelevant to the lending decision. GreendayOnline clarifies this misunderstanding by focusing on current income while maintaining responsible lending standards. The platform provides no check loans guaranteed approval direct lender connections for qualified applicants.

    GreendayOnline’s network of licensed direct lenders utilizes soft credit inquiries that leave borrowers’ credit scores unaffected. This approach allows the platform to assess creditworthiness without a hard credit pull while still maintaining due diligence standards required by state regulations.

    Credit Check vs Soft Credit Inquiry: Why Your Credit Score Remains Unaffected

    Traditional lending involves hard credit inquiries that can temporarily lower credit scores by 5-10 points. GreendayOnline’s soft credit approach means that borrowers searching for “credit check loans” or “payday loans with no credit” requirements can explore their options without damaging their credit profiles. The platform offers loans no credit check guaranteed approval through its streamlined verification process.

    The distinction matters significantly for borrowers with low credit scores who cannot afford additional credit damage. GreendayOnline’s no credit check methodology evaluates the ability to repay the loan through alternative data sources, ensuring responsible lending without traditional credit barriers.

    GreendayOnline’s Geographic Expansion Brings Online Payday Loans to 32 States

    The digital lending landscape has evolved dramatically, with online payday loans now representing over 60% of total market volume. GreendayOnline’s expansion to 32 states addresses a critical gap in market coverage, particularly for borrowers in underserved communities where traditional payday storefronts may be limited or non-existent.

    Traditional Payday Lending Locations vs GreendayOnline’s Digital Reach

    While approximately 13,700 traditional payday storefronts operate nationwide, geographic concentration leaves significant coverage gaps. GreendayOnline’s digital platform eliminates location barriers, providing consistent access to small payday loans online same day services regardless of physical proximity to lending locations.

    The company’s research reveals striking disparities in lending access:

    • Rural areas: 73% lack physical payday lending locations within 25 miles
    • Urban centers: Average of 2.3 storefronts per 10,000 residents
    • Suburban regions: Limited evening and weekend availability
    • Digital platforms: 24/7 accessibility with consistent service standards

    State-by-State Analysis: Where Payday Loan No Credit Check Services Are Available

    GreendayOnline’s 32-state footprint covers regions where “payday loan no credit check” services remain legally permissible under current regulatory frameworks. This strategic geographic focus ensures compliance while maximizing borrower access to legitimate lending options. In California, the focus is on the famous 255 payday loans online, due to loan amount restrictions.

    Key expansion states include major population centers where demand for loans for bad credit in 2025 and short-term loans continues growing. Here is the full list in alphabetical order: Alabama, Alaska, California, Colorado, Delaware, Florida, Hawaii, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Nevada, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington, Wisconsin, and Wyoming.

    The company’s analysis shows particular opportunity in states where existing options remain limited despite legal permissibility.

    How GreendayOnline Serves Underbanked Communities Through Online Same Day Access

    Underbanked populations—estimated at 63 million Americans—face particular challenges accessing emergency credit. Search patterns reveal these communities frequently search for “payday loans online guaranteed approval”, “loans guaranteed approval”, and “instant payday loans online guaranteed” options as traditional banking relationships prove inadequate for urgent financial needs.

    GreendayOnline’s entirely online platform removes common barriers that underbanked consumers face:

    1. No physical branch visits required
    2. Minimal documentation through digital verification
    3. Bank account integration for streamlined processing
    4. Mobile-optimized application experience
    5. Multiple communication channels for customer support

    1 Hour Payday Loans Online: GreendayOnline’s Application and Approval

    The promise of 1 hour payday loans online requires sophisticated technology infrastructure capable of processing applications, verifying information, and disbursing funds within compressed timeframes. GreendayOnline’s platform architecture supports this commitment through automated decision-making and real-time bank integration. The platform offers credit payday loans with 1-hour processing for urgent financial needs.

    Completing a Secure Online Form for Loans Online No Credit Check

    GreendayOnline’s application process begins with completing a secure online form designed for maximum efficiency and security. The platform’s streamlined interface collects essential information while minimizing borrower effort and completion time.

    The application captures key data points necessary to evaluate loans online no credit check:

    • Personal identification information
    • Employment and income verification
    • Bank account details for funding and repayment
    • Contact information for communication
    • Loan amount and preferred terms

    Advanced encryption protects all submitted information, ensuring that borrowers’ financial data remains secure throughout the approval procedure. The platform’s mobile-responsive design accommodates borrowers who prefer smartphone applications over desktop interfaces.

    Income Rather Than Credit History: GreendayOnline’s Alternative Assessment Method

    GreendayOnline’s underwriting philosophy prioritizes income rather than credit history when evaluating loan approval decisions. This approach recognizes that credit scores may not accurately reflect current financial capacity, particularly for borrowers who have experienced temporary financial disruptions. The platform provides services that focus on current financial ability rather than past credit issues.

    The platform’s alternative assessment methodology examines:

    • Current monthly income stability
    • Bank account transaction patterns
    • Employment verification through multiple data sources
    • Existing debt obligations and payment history
    • Cash flow analysis for repayment capacity

    This comprehensive evaluation enables GreendayOnline to serve borrowers who might struggle with credit check payday loans from traditional lenders offering no credit check while maintaining responsible lending standards.

    From Application to Account Within an Hour: The GreendayOnline Timeline

    GreendayOnline’s commitment to “account within an hour” funding reflects significant technology investment in automated processing and real-time financial institution integration. The typical timeline progresses as follows:

    0-5 minutes: Application submission and initial verification 5-15 minutes: Income rather than credit assessment and underwriting review 15-30 minutes: Loan approval notification and terms confirmation 30-60 minutes: Fund disbursement to borrower’s designated account

    This accelerated timeline addresses the urgent nature of most 1 hour payday loans requests while ensuring thorough evaluation of each application.

    Payday Loans Online No Credit Check: Loan Options and Terms Through GreendayOnline

    GreendayOnline’s payday loans online no credit check offerings encompass multiple product variations designed to accommodate diverse borrower needs and financial circumstances. The platform’s loan options reflect both market demand and regulatory requirements across its 32-state operating region.

    Loan Amounts and Repayment Terms for 1 Hour Payday Loans No Credit

    Loan amounts available through GreendayOnline’s platform range from $100 to $1,000, with specific limits varying by state regulation and individual borrower qualification. The company’s “hour payday loans no credit” products feature flexible repayment structures designed to align with borrowers’ pay cycles.

    Standard loan terms include:

    • Repayment periods: 14-30 days based on borrower preference
    • Extension options: Available in states where legally permitted
    • Early repayment: No prepayment penalties
    • Automatic renewal: Optional with explicit borrower consent
    • Payment scheduling: Aligned with pay day cycles when possible

    The platform ensures that loans due dates are clearly communicated and aligned with borrower income schedules to minimize payment conflicts.

    Understanding APR and Loan Terms for Payday Loans with No Credit Requirements

    Transparency in loan terms represents a cornerstone of GreendayOnline’s approach to payday loans with no credit requirements. The platform provides clear APR calculations and fee structures before borrowers commit to any loan agreement.

    GreendayOnline’s fee structure adheres to state regulatory maximums while offering payday loans online with no credit check with a competitive marketplace. Borrowers receive detailed breakdowns of all costs associated with their payday lending experience, including:

    1. Principal loan amount
    2. Finance charges and fees
    3. Total repayment amount
    4. Effective APR calculation
    5. Payment due dates and methods

    Multiple Loan Offers vs Single Direct Lender: GreendayOnline’s Approach

    Unlike platforms that provide multiple loan offers from various lenders, GreendayOnline operates as a direct lender platform, streamlining the borrowing experience and eliminating confusion over varying terms and conditions. This approach ensures consistent service standards and simplified communication throughout the lending relationship.

    Bad Credit and Personal Loan Alternatives: How GreendayOnline Serves All Credit Types

    The intersection of bad credit and emergency lending needs creates particular challenges for borrowers who face rejection from traditional personal loan providers. GreendayOnline’s inclusive approach recognizes that financial history may not reflect current financial stability or repayment capacity.

    Loans for Bad Credit: GreendayOnline’s No Hard Credit Pull Policy

    GreendayOnline’s loans for bad credit methodology eliminates the anxiety many borrowers experience when applying for emergency funding. The platform’s no hard credit pull policy ensures that application inquiries do not involve a hard credit check that could further damage struggling credit profiles.

    This approach particularly benefits borrowers who have experienced:

    • Recent financial hardships affecting credit scores
    • Medical debt or unexpected emergency expenses
    • Employment disruptions or income reductions
    • Limited credit history or “thin file” credit profiles
    • Previous payday lending experiences

    Short-Term Loans vs Personal Loan Options for Low Credit Borrowers

    While personal loan products typically require extensive credit evaluation and longer approval timeframes, GreendayOnline’s short-term loans provide immediate access to emergency funding for borrowers with low credit scores. The platform’s products bridge the gap between expensive credit card advances and traditional installment lending.

    Short-term loan advantages include:

    • Faster approval and funding timelines
    • Lower qualification requirements
    • No collateral or cosigner requirements
    • Flexible repayment scheduling
    • Minimal impact on existing credit relationships

    Why Credit History Doesn’t Determine Loan Approval with GreendayOnline

    GreendayOnline’s underwriting philosophy recognizes that credit history represents past financial behavior rather than current repayment capacity. The platform’s alternative evaluation methods focus on real-time financial indicators that better predict successful loan repayment.

    Key evaluation factors beyond credit scores include:

    1. Current employment status and income stability
    2. Bank account activity and cash flow patterns
    3. Existing debt obligations and payment history
    4. Length of banking relationship and account management
    5. Geographic and demographic risk factors

    Instant Payday Loans Online Guaranteed Approval: GreendayOnline’s Direct Lender Network

    The concept of guaranteed approval in lending requires careful interpretation, as responsible lenders must maintain underwriting standards while maximizing approval rates. GreendayOnline’s approach to “instant payday loans online guaranteed approval” balances accessibility with prudent risk management.

    Guaranteed Approval Direct Lender Services vs Traditional Banking

    While no legitimate lender can offer truly guaranteed approval without any qualification requirements, GreendayOnline’s “guaranteed approval direct lender” approach maximizes approval rates through flexible underwriting criteria and alternative data evaluation methods.

    The platform’s approval rates significantly exceed traditional banking standards:

    • GreendayOnline approval rate: 89% for qualified applicants
    • Traditional bank personal loans: 23-31% approval rates
    • Credit union emergency loans: 45-52% approval rates
    • Credit card cash advances: 67% approval for existing cardholders

    Payday Loans Online Guaranteed Approval Process Through Licensed Lenders

    GreendayOnline’s “payday loans online guaranteed approval” process operates exclusively through licensed direct lenders compliant with state and federal regulations. This commitment ensures borrower protection while maintaining the accessibility that emergency lending requires.

    The platform’s network of lenders offering payday loans undergoes rigorous vetting to ensure:

    • Full licensing compliance in all operating states
    • Adherence to maximum fee and rate regulations
    • Transparent disclosure of all loan terms and conditions
    • Proper data security and privacy protections
    • Responsive customer service and dispute resolution

    How GreendayOnline Connects Borrowers with Licensed Direct Lenders

    GreendayOnline’s role as a connector between borrowers seeking “loans guaranteed approval direct lender” services and qualified lending partners streamlines the emergency funding process. The platform’s technology matches borrower profiles with appropriate offers based on qualification criteria and funding requirements.

    Online Loans No Credit Check: GreendayOnline’s Technology and Market Position

    As the digital lending landscape continues evolving, GreendayOnline’s position in the market, dedicated to online loans with no credit check, reflects both technological sophistication and market understanding. The platform’s expansion to 32 states positions it as a significant player in the estimated $35 billion annual payday lending market.

    Lenders Offering 1 Hour Payday Loans Through GreendayOnline’s Platform

    GreendayOnline’s network of lenders offering 1 hour payday loans represents carefully vetted financial institutions committed to responsible lending practices and rapid decision-making. The platform’s technology enables lenders through a secure online portal to access borrower applications and make real-time lending decisions.

    Partner lender qualifications include:

    • State licensing for payday lending operations
    • Minimum capitalization requirements for lending volume
    • Technology integration capabilities for real-time processing
    • Customer service standards meeting platform requirements
    • Compliance monitoring and reporting capabilities

    Credit Check Loans Guaranteed Approval vs No Credit Check Options

    The distinction between “credit check loans guaranteed approval” and true no credit check lending affects borrower experience and approval outcomes. GreendayOnline’s approach utilizes soft credit inquiries that provide lenders with credit information without a hard credit pull, affecting borrower credit scores.

    This hybrid methodology enables the platform to offer no credit check loans with guaranteed approval rates approaching true no credit check lending while maintaining responsible underwriting standards required by state regulations.

    Next Payday Funding: How GreendayOnline Ensures Timely Loan Processing

    GreendayOnline’s commitment to next payday funding timelines requires sophisticated coordination between application processing, underwriting decisions, and fund disbursement systems. The platform’s technology infrastructure supports same-day funding for applications approved before daily cutoff times.

    The company’s “repay the loan” scheduling system automatically aligns with borrower pay cycles when possible, reducing the likelihood of payment timing conflicts that could result in additional fees or credit inquiry impacts.

    About GreendayOnline

    GreendayOnline operates as a leading digital lending platform specializing in 1-hour payday loans no credit check services across 32 states where such lending remains legally permissible. The company’s technology-driven approach to offering no credit check loans serves borrowers who require fast access to emergency funding while maintaining responsible lending standards and regulatory compliance.

    For more information about GreendayOnline’s “loan no credit check options” and expanded geographic availability, visit https://greendayonline.com/ or contact the company’s customer service team.

    Media Contact:
    Tarquin Nemec
    GreendayOnline Public Relations Phone: (800) 424-2789
    Email: tarquin.nemec@greendayonline.com

    This press release contains forward-looking statements regarding GreendayOnline’s expansion plans and market position. Actual results may differ from those projected. Lending decisions are subject to state regulations and individual borrower qualification. All loan products are subject to regulatory approval and may not be available in all states.

    The MIL Network –

  • MIL-OSI USA: “Free Money” Gang Members Indicted for Committing Murder at Local Shopping Center

    Source: US State of Vermont

    Two alleged members of Free Money, a violent Houston-based street gang, were indicted yesterday in the Southern District of Texas for their alleged roles in the murder of one individual and attempted murder of another during a gang-related ambush.

    According to court documents, Free Money members and associates engage in robbery, home invasions, drug distribution, and murder. The defendants, Terry Ardoin, 24, and Travonte Ardoin, 27, both of Houston, allegedly committed the murder in connection with an ongoing gang war with a rival group.

    On June 24, 2022, in broad daylight, surveillance footage captured the Ardoins following a Chevrolet Equinox into a shopping center parking lot in a Black Nissan Altima. As alleged in court documents, the driver of the Equinox entered a nearby store while the passenger remained in the vehicle. When the driver returned, the Ardoins allegedly exited the Altima wearing masks and opened fire on both individuals.

    Witnesses reported hearing numerous gunshots and described the distinct sound of a fully automatic weapon, believed to have been modified with a machine gun conversion device commonly referred to as a “switch.” 

    Multiple rounds struck the vehicle’s passenger compartment. Houston Police Department officers responded within minutes and found one victim deceased.

    Terry and Travonte Ardoin are charged with murder in aid of racketeering, attempted murder in aid of racketeering, use of a firearm in furtherance of a crime of violence and causing death through the use of a firearm. If convicted, they face a maximum penalty of life in prison or a death sentence. A federal district court judge will determine any sentence after considering the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and other statutory factors.

    The FBI conducted the investigation with the assistance of the Houston Police Department.

    Trial Attorney Ralph Paradiso of the Criminal Division’s Violent Crime and Racketeering Section (VCRS) and Assistant U.S. Attorney Benjamin Brown for the Southern District of Texas are prosecuting the case.

    This case is part of the Criminal Division’s Violent Crime Initiative to prosecute violent crimes in Houston. The Criminal Division and the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Texas have partnered, along with local, state, and federal law enforcement agencies, to confront violent crimes committed by gang members and associates through the enforcement of federal laws and use of federal resources to prosecute the violent offenders and prevent further violence.

    An indictment is merely an allegation. All defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI Security: Two Men Charged For Nationwide Fraud Scheme Targeting Hundreds Of Elderly Victims

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

    Jingbin Jiang and Su Jian Liu Are Charged With Participating in a Scheme That Attempted to Steal Over $18 Million From Over 350 Victims

    United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, Jay Clayton; Assistant Director in Charge of the New York Field Office of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”), Christopher G. Raia; and Commissioner of the New York City Police Department (“NYPD”), Jessica S. Tisch,  announced charges against JINGBIN JIANG and SU JIAN LIU, a/k/a “Fatty,” a/k/a “Ah Pang,” for a scheme to defraud elderly victims across the United States, which attempted to steal over $18 million from over 350 victims and resulted in actual losses of over $5 million to over 70 victims.  JIANG was arrested in Staten Island this morning and will be presented today before U.S. Magistrate Judge Stewart D. Aaron.  LIU is still at large.  The case is assigned to U.S. District Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil.

    “As alleged, Jingbin Jiang and Su Jian Liu worked together with others to steal the hard-earned money of some our most vulnerable New Yorkers and others around the country,” said U.S. Attorney Jay Clayton.  “Taking advantage of our elderly after they have worked so hard to save and contributed so much to our city and this country is heartless and despicable.  These charges, and the efforts of the FBI and the NYPD, should serve as a warning to fraudsters and cybercriminals: New Yorkers want you held accountable for your crimes, and the women and men of our Office are committed to doing so.”

    “Jingbin Jiang and Su Jian Liu allegedly defrauded elderly victims of more than $5 million by utilizing extortionate tactics to coerce withdrawals of significant cash or purchases of gold,” said FBI Assistant Director Christopher G. Raia.  “This alleged conspiracy wielded fear of bankruptcy and arrest to ensure victims complied with the unlawful requests for money.  The FBI is committed to apprehending any individual who utilizes online platforms to target and exploit vulnerable victims across the country.”

    “These defendants allegedly led a nationwide fraud scheme with the goal of targeting innocent, elderly victims and stealing millions of their hard-earned savings,” said NYPD Commissioner Jessica S. Tisch.  “Jingbin Jiang and Su Jian Liu allegedly participated in a plot involving elaborate, fictitious narratives to manipulate elderly victims and trick them into participating in their scheme, which involved attempts to steal over $18 million from 350 people.  I am grateful to the members of the NYPD, FBI, and the U.S. Attorney’s Office for holding these alleged predatory fraudsters accountable.”

    According to the allegations in the Indictment unsealed today in Manhattan federal court:[1]

    Between at least in or about 2023 and in or about July 2025, JIANG and LIU participated with others in a fraudulent scheme that primarily targeted elderly victims located all across the United States, including in New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Massachusetts, Texas, Washington, Wisconsin, California, Connecticut, Arizona, North Carolina, South Carolina, Missouri, Mississippi, Kentucky, Utah, Oregon, Colorado, and Montana.

    The scheme proceeded in the following manner: First, victims would typically see a pop-up message on their computers indicating that they needed to call a particular phone number controlled by members of the scheme.  The pop-up message would typically claim to come from a technology company, a bank, or the government.  Second, when victims called the phone number, they were told a fictitious narrative that would ultimately lead to a suggestion that the victims withdraw money from their bank account.  For example, some victims were falsely told that their computers had a virus, or that their computers had been hacked into and used to commit serious crimes, like downloading child sexual abuse material.  Others were falsely told that their bank accounts had been compromised and were vulnerable to unauthorized withdrawals.  To avoid arrest or protect their bank accounts from being compromised, victims were instructed to withdraw large amounts of cash from their bank accounts or purchase large quantities of gold.  Some victims were even told that their money would be safely held in the custody of a consumer protection agency like the Federal Trade Commission, and they were sent notices on fake federal government letterhead purporting to bear the signature of a federal government official:

    Third, many victims were told that a courier would be arriving at their home (or other coordinated pick-up location) to retrieve the gold and/or cash.  Victims were often provided with the courier’s name (which was fictitious), a description of the courier’s clothing, and sometimes a password, purportedly to ensure the courier was authorized to pick up the gold and/or cash.  Other victims were told to purchase and transfer cryptocurrency or gift cards, which did not require a courier.  Victims were typically under the impression that this gold and/or cash would then be deposited, on the victims’ behalf, into a new, safe, uncompromised bank account (or with the Federal Trade Commission, as noted above) that they could access without concern in the future.  In reality, these funds were stolen and never returned to the victims.  Some victims engaged in multiple transactions before realizing the fraudulent nature of the scheme.

    JIANG and LIU participated in the scheme by managing and supervising the couriers that traveled to meet the victims to pick up the cash and gold, which was then transported back to New York City.  JIANG and LIU received information about potential victims from other members of the scheme on text-messaging platforms, in messages that typically included the zip codes and the amounts of cash or gold to be collected from each victim. JIANG and LIU could then decide whether to accept the pick-up, and if they did, the other members of the scheme would provide more specific details about the victim and when and where to pick up the cash or gold.  After arranging for couriers to make the pick-ups, JIANG and LIU would provide updates to other members of the scheme about the couriers’ progress.  After the victims provided the criminal proceeds to the couriers, JIANG and LIU arranged for the criminal proceeds to be distributed to other members of the scheme, including by converting cash and gold into cryptocurrency to be easily transmitted to members of the scheme located overseas, including in India and China.  In total, members of the conspiracy have attempted to steal at least approximately $18 million from over 350 victims, and they have successfully stolen at least approximately $5 million from over 70 victims.

    If you or someone you know has been victimized by this scheme, please file a complaint with the FBI’s Internet Crime Complaint Center, which is available at ic3.gov.

    *                *                *

    JIANG, 37, of Staten Island, New York, and LIU, 38 of Edmond, Oklahoma, are both charged with one count of wire fraud conspiracy, which carries a maximum sentence of 20 years in prison; and one count of conspiracy to commit interstate transportation of stolen property, which carries a maximum sentence of five years in prison.

    The maximum potential sentences in this case are prescribed by Congress and provided here for informational purposes only, as any sentencing of the defendants will be determined by the judge.

    Mr. Clayton praised the investigative work of the FBI and NYPD’s Joint Organized Crime Task Force.  Mr. Clayton also thanked the New York State Police and the Bedford Police Department for their assistance in the investigation of this case.

    This case is being handled by the Office’s Violent & Organized Crime Unit. Assistant U.S. Attorneys Andrew K. Chan and Angela Zhu are in charge of the prosecution. 

    The charges contained in the Indictment are merely accusations, and the defendants are presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.

    [1] As the introductory phrase signifies, the entirety of the text of the Indictment and the description of the Indictment set forth herein constitute only allegations, and every fact described herein should be treated as an allegation.

    MIL Security OSI –

  • MIL-OSI Security: Bloods Gang Member Apprehended in Durham in Possession of a Firearm while on Post-Release Supervision Sentenced

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

    GREENSBORO – A Durham, North Carolina man was sentenced today in Greensboro to 8 years in prison after pleading guilty to a firearm charge, announced United States Attorney Clifton T. Barrett of the Middle District of North Carolina (MDNC).   

    WILLIAM LOVELL HARPER, age 26, was sentenced to a total of 96 months imprisonment plus 3 years of post-release supervision by the Honorable William L. Osteen, Jr., United States District Judge for the MDNC.

    According to court records, on September 4, 2024, officers apprehended HARPER on Hillsborough Road in Durham and recovered a loaded handgun from his person. At the time of his apprehension, HARPER had three active warrants for his arrest, including one stemming from a robbery in Durham on March 2024 and another for violating his post-release supervision. HARPER had been previously convicted of Assault with a Deadly Weapon Inflicting Serious Injury and Robbery with a Dangerous Weapon in Beaufort County in 2017, as well as Conspiracy to Commit Assault with a Deadly Weapon with Intent to Kill in Craven County in 2018. Thus, at the time of the instant offense, HARPER was legally prohibited from possessing a firearm.

    In 2023, HARPER admitted that he was a member of the Bloods criminal street gang.

    In April of this year, HARPER was convicted of Robbery of a Dangerous Weapon and Possession of a Firearm by a Felon in Durham County for conduct occurring on March 28, 2024. He received a sentence of 11 to 146 months. 60 months of today’s federal sentence will run consecutively to HARPER’s state sentence.

    HARPER pleaded guilty on April 10, 2025, to one count of felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(a)(8).

    The case was investigated by the Durham Police Department and the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Valuable assistance was provided by the Durham County District Attorney’s Office. The case was prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Eric Iverson.

    ###

    MIL Security OSI –

  • MIL-OSI Security: Andover Man Pleads Guilty for Producing and Possessing Child Sexual Abuse Images

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

    CONCORD – An Andover man pleaded guilty yesterday in federal court for producing and possessing child sexual abuse material (CSAM), Acting U.S. Attorney Jay McCormack announces.

    Dale Howe, age 37, pleaded guilty in federal court to three counts of Production of Child Pornography and one count of Possession of Child Pornography. U.S. District Court Judge Paul J. Barbadoro scheduled sentencing for November 5, 2025.

    According to the charging documents and statements made in court, the defendant provided the minor victim with drugs and sexually assaulted the minor victim. The defendant created images of the sexual abuse, which were found during a search of his phone. The defendant distributed at least three of the child sexual abuse images through a social media platform. The defendant was also in possession of more than 3,500 files of unrelated CSAM.

    The charges for Production of Child Pornography provide for a sentence with a minimum term of imprisonment of 15 years and a maximum term of imprisonment of 30 years, a maximum fine of $250,000, and a term of supervised release of at least 5 years. The charge for Possession of Child Pornography provides for a sentence with a maximum term of imprisonment of 10 years, a maximum fine of $250,000, and a term of supervised release of at least 5 years. Sentences are imposed by a federal district court judge based upon the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and statutes which govern the determination of a sentence in a criminal case.

    Homeland Security Investigations, the Andover Police Department, and the New Hampshire State Police, the Merrimack County Sheriff’s Office, New Hampshire Internet Crimes Against Children (ICAC) and the Derry Police Department provided valuable assistance. Assistant U.S Attorneys Heather A. Cherniske and Anna Z. Krasinski are prosecuting the case.

     

    ###

    MIL Security OSI –

  • MIL-OSI Security: Man Sentenced to Federal Prison for Distribution of Child Pornography

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

    WACO – A Mississippi man was sentenced in federal court to 240 months in prison for distribution of child pornography, involving the sexual exploitation of a minor.

    According to court documents, Foster Denzel Harris, aided and abetted by another, knowingly distributed and attempted to distribute visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct in violation of federal statute.

    In 2022, the victim in this case reported to FBI that she had been exploited when she was 16 years old, and living in Killeen, Texas. Between 2016 and 2022, while using KiK social media application on her phone, Harris extorted $21,000 dollars from her, threatening to expose her if she didn’t pay.

    “Today’s sentencing sends a clear message that those who exploit children by distributing child sexual abuse material will be held fully accountable,” said FBI Special Agent in Charge Aron Tapp. “The pain these victims silently endure is immeasurable, and the FBI will relentlessly pursue anyone who preys on them. We applaud the extraordinary courage of the victim in this case, whose fortitude to come forward enabled us to obtain a measure of justice and put a stop to the continues abuse. If you have information about child exploitation, contact your local FBI office or submit a tip at tips.fbi.gov.”

    This 20-year sentence is the maximum sentence allowed under the statute. Harris was also ordered to pay $31,429.00 in restitution to the victim and placed on lifetime supervised release. This case was investigated by the FBI San Antonio Child Exploitation and Human Trafficking Task Force, and Assistant U.S. Attorney Gregg Gloff prosecuted the case.

    This case was brought as part of Project Safe Childhood, a nationwide initiative to combat the growing epidemic of child sexual exploitation and abuse launched in May 2006 by the Department of Justice. Led by U.S. Attorneys’ Offices and CEOS, Project Safe Childhood marshals federal, state and local resources to better locate, apprehend and prosecute individuals who exploit children via the Internet, as well as to identify and rescue victims. For more information about Project Safe Childhood, please visit www.justice.gov/psc.

    MIL Security OSI –

  • MIL-OSI Security: “Free Money” gang members indicted for committing murder at local shopping center

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

    HOUSTON – Two alleged members of a violent Houston-based street gang have been charged for their alleged roles in the murder of one individual and attempted murder of another during a gang-related ambush.

    According to court documents, members and associates of the gang known as Free Money engage in robbery, home invasions, drug distribution and murder. Terry Ardoin, 24, and Travonte Ardoin, 27, both of Houston, allegedly committed the murder in connection with an ongoing gang war with a rival group.

    On June 24, 2022, in broad daylight, the Ardoins allegedly following a Chevrolet Equinox into a shopping center parking lot in a Black Nissan Altima. As alleged in court documents, the driver of the Equinox entered a nearby store while the passenger remained in the vehicle. When the driver returned, the Ardoins allegedly exited the Altima wearing masks and opened fired on both individuals.

    Multiple rounds struck the vehicle’s passenger compartment. Law enforcement responded within minutes and found one victim deceased.

    Terry and Travonte Ardoin are charged with murder in aid of racketeering, attempted murder in aid of racketeering, use of a firearm in furtherance of a crime of violence and causing death through the use of a firearm. If convicted, they face up to life in prison or the possibility of a death sentence.

    The FBI conducted the investigation with the assistance of Houston Police Department.

    Assistant U.S. Attorney Benjamin Brown is prosecuting the case along with Trial Attorney Ralph Paradiso of the Criminal Division’s Violent Crime and Racketeering Section.

    This case is part of the Criminal Division’s Violent Crime Initiative to prosecute violent crimes in Houston. The Criminal Division and the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Texas have partnered, along with local, state and federal law enforcement agencies, to confront violent crimes gang members and associates have committed through the enforcement of federal laws and use of federal resources to prosecute violent offenders and prevent further violence.

    An indictment is a formal accusation of criminal conduct, not evidence. A defendant is presumed innocent unless convicted through due process of law.

    MIL Security OSI –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Cassidy Introduces Legislation to Crack Down on Money Laundering, Terror Financing in Art Market

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Louisiana Bill Cassidy

    WASHINGTON – U.S. Senator Bill Cassidy, M.D. (R-LA) introduced the Art Market Integrity Act to require art dealers and auction houses to comply with anti-money-laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing regulations under the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA). Currently, the art market, a $25 billion industry in the United States and the largest of its kind globally, is one of the last major markets not required to meet these standards, making it vulnerable to exploitation by criminals, terrorist financiers, and other sanctioned individuals.
    “Criminals and terrorists use art sales to fund their crimes,” said Dr. Cassidy. “We have similar rules for jewelry, precious metals, real estate, and more. Let’s do it for art too.”
    Cassidy was joined by U.S. Senators John Fetterman (D-PA), Chuck Grassley (R-IA), Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI), David McCormick (R-PA), and Andy Kim (D-NJ) in introducing the legislation. 
    Background
    In recent years, the U.S. Department of the Treasury identified the art market as particularly susceptible to money laundering and sanctions evasion. High-profile cases have spotlighted the urgent need for reform, including the indictment of Hezbollah financier Nazem Ahmad using art as part of his scheme to launder over $160 million. Multiple Kremlin cronies have used art to evade sanctions: Arkady and Boris Rotenberg used $18 million worth of art to get around sanctions, Roman Abramovich transferred almost $1 billion in art to his wife ahead of new sanctions, and last year the DOJ indicted Anastasia Simes for laundering money on behalf of sanctioned Kremlin crony Aleksander Udadov.
    The bill is endorsed by the Antiquities Coalition, Transparency International U.S., the FACT Coalition, FDD Action, the American Jewish Committee, Razom for Ukraine, American Coalition for Ukraine, the Initiative for the Recovery of Venezuelan Assets(INRAV), the National Border Patrol Council, and the Federal Law Enforcement Officers Association (FLEOA).

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Kaptur, Quigley, Pingree Call for Trump Administration to Preserve Legal Status for Ukrainians

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Congresswoman Marcy Kaptur (OH-09)

    Toledo, OH – Today, Congresswoman Marcy Kaptur (OH-09), and Congressman Mike QuigleyCo-Chairs of the Congressional Ukraine Caucus, together with Congresswoman Chellie Pingree (ME-01), led 33 members of Congress in calling on the Trump administration to rapidly address applications for legal status and work authorization by Ukrainians currently in the United States.

     “Murderous Dictator Putin continues his unprovoked war of aggression, unleashing daily barrages of rockets and terror on innocent Ukrainian civilians. The United States and the Free World have a moral obligation to protect those who may yet fall under his murderous rampage. Since the full scale escalation of Russia’s war in Ukraine in February, 2022, more than 270,000 Ukrainians have sought refuge in America. For more than 3 years, Ukrainian refugees have contributed greatly to communities nationwide, including in the greater Toledo and Cleveland areas in my home state of Ohio.” said Congresswoman Marcy Kaptur (OH-09), Co-Founder and Co-Chair of the Congressional Ukraine Caucus. “The success of the U4U program is unquestioned, with more than 175,000 Ukrainian nationals currently in the United States through this program. I was pleased to hear and echo President Trump’s sentiment earlier this week that we must continue to grant them the safety and shelter that prevents them from being forced back into the setting of war. America has long been a refuge for those whose lives are threatened by immediate danger, and we must continue serving as a shining light for Liberty for those fleeing tyranny and terror.” 

    Since Russia invaded Ukraine, tens of thousands of Ukrainians have sought refuge in the United States through the Uniting for Ukraine (U4U) program. Now, many are seeing their statuses lapse as a massive backlog has developed within US Citizenship and Immigration Services. Following President Trump’s recent encouraging comments about the U4U program, the bipartisan group of members is urging the administration to adjudicate outstanding requests for legal status and work authorization and to extend parole for Ukrainians with expiring statuses.

    The members wrote, in part in their letter, “After years of being employed, paying taxes, and contributing to our neighborhoods, Ukrainians in our districts now live in uncertainty–a state of limbo that hurts communities and employers alike who’ve sought to help this population.”

    Other signers of the letter include Representatives: Ukraine Caucus Co-Chair Brian Fitzpatrick (PA-01), Eleanor Holmes Norton (DC-00), Danny Davis (IL-07), Dan Goldman (NY-10), Josh Gottheimer (NJ-05), Hank Johnson (GA-04), Seth Magaziner (RI-02), Pramila Jayapal (WA-07), Eugene Vindman (VA-07), Tom Suozzi (NY-03), Jennifer McClellan (VA-04), Marilyn Strickland (WA-10), Lloyd Doggett (TX-37), Seth Moulton (MA-06), Nikema Williams (GA-05), Eric Swalwell (CA-14), Greg Landsman (OH-01), Steve Cohen (TN-09), Raja Krishnamoorthi (IL-08), Brendan Boyle (PA-02), Adam Smith (WA-09), Dina Titus (NV-01), Joe Morelle (NY-25), Mary Gay Scanlon (PA-05), Rick Larsen (WA-02), Rob Menendez (NJ-08), Bill Keating (MA-09), Chrissy Houlahan (PA-06), Greg Casar (TX-35), Shri Thanedar (MI-13), Jason Crow (CO-06), Maggie Goodlander (NH-02), and Jim Costa (CA-21). 

    A copy of the signed letter is available HERE. The full text of the letter is available below:

    Dear Secretary Noem and Director Edlow,

    We write to express our continued support for Ukrainians who have been granted temporary status in the United States through the Uniting for Ukraine program. We ask your administration to take swift, decisive actions to preserve legal status and work authorization for Ukrainians who have found safety in the United States amid the devastating conflict brought upon their homeland.

    Five months ago, we marked three years since Vladimir Putin launched his full-scale, unprovoked, and illegal invasion of Ukraine. This brutal assault on Ukraine’s sovereignty and democracy has forced millions to flee their homeland in search of safety. Since February 24, 2022, tens of thousands of Ukrainians have sought refuge in the United States. For many of them, the Uniting for Ukraine (U4U) program has provided a vital humanitarian lifeline, offering a pathway to safety, dignity, and hope.

    Many individuals and families from Ukraine received travel authorization to the United States, a lawful status and temporary basis for work authorization through the Uniting for Ukraine program for up to two years. However, Ukrainians in our districts are increasingly seeing their statuses and work authorization lapse under expiring grants of parole offered under the program. After years of being employed, paying taxes, and contributing to our neighborhoods, Ukrainians in our districts now live in uncertainty–a state of limbo that hurts communities and employers alike who’ve sought to help this population. We believe a series of limited, concrete actions within your authority could protect this population as hostilities continue in Ukraine, such as:

    1)      Adjudicate outstanding requests for lawful status, work authorization: Many Ukrainians have applied for re-parole, Temporary Protected Status, and work authorization but have not had their applications adjudicated by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) under an administrative hold. We urge USCIS to swiftly adjudicate outstanding employment authorization and other benefits requests from U4U beneficiaries under the June 9 “Adjudication of Requests filed by Parolees Under Specified Parole Programs” memo. Backlog reduction efforts would make a substantial difference in providing certainty and clarity to thousands of Ukrainian individuals and families who sought relief in a timely manner.

    2)      Re-parole and/or parole extensions for Ukrainians with expiring parole: Under the operational lifting of the USCIS administrative pause, DHS should accept, consider, and adjudicate new applications for re-parole from U4U beneficiaries, or deploy a limited parole extension process on a case-by-case basis. These processes would provide an orderly framework for Ukrainians to preserve an expiring status and/or work authorization outside of the backlogged asylum system.

    We are grateful for your administration’s support for peace in Ukraine. Until that is achieved, we ask you to preserve protections for those affected by this terrible war.

    # # #

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI Security: Boston Man Pleads Guilty to Failing to Register as a Sex Offender

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

    Defendant previously convicted of sodomy and assault with intent to rape a minor under 12

    BOSTON – A Boston man pleaded guilty today in federal court in Boston to failure to register as a sex offender. Defendant served in United States Navy in April 1998 when he was convicted of sodomy, assault and intent to rape a minor under the age of 12.

    Adrian Martinez, 56, pleaded guilty to one count of failing to register as a sex offender before U.S. District Court Judge Leo T. Sorokin who scheduled sentencing for Oct. 28, 2025. In April 2025, Martinez was arrested and charged.

    Martinez is a Level 3 sex offender who was previously convicted while serving in the United States Navy of: committing sodomy with a person under the age of 12; taking indecent liberties upon the body of a female under 12 years of age (4 counts); and assault with intent to rapea person under the age of 12, in violation of Uniformed Code of Military Justice.

    Following his conviction, Martinez was sentenced to a 40-year period of incarceration. Martinez served approximately 11 years of his 40 year sentence and was released from custody in February of 2009. Martinez was required to register as a sex offender and update his registration any time he moved or changed employment. At some point after Sept. 30, 2022, Martinez moved out of his Boston residence and did not notify law enforcement of his change in registered address. Boston Police attempted to contact Martinez but were unsuccessful in their attempts.

    Martinez faces a sentence of up to 10 years in prison, a minimum of five years and up to lifetime supervised release and a fine of $250,000. Sentences are imposed by a federal district court judge based upon the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and other statutory factors.

    United States Attorney Leah B. Foley and Kevin Neal, Acting United States Marshal for the District of Massachusetts made the announcement today. Assistant U.S. Attorney Luke A. Goldworm, Project Safe Childhood Coordinator and a member of the Major Crimes Unit is prosecuting the case.

    The case is brought as part of Project Safe Childhood. In 2006, the Department of Justice created Project Safe Childhood, a nationwide initiative designed to protect children from exploitation and abuse. Led by the U.S. Attorneys’ Offices and the DOJ’s Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section, Project Safe Childhood marshals federal, state and local resources to better locate, apprehend, and prosecute individuals who exploit children, as well as identify and rescue victims.  For more information about Project Safe Childhood, please visit www.projectsafechildhood.gov/.

    MIL Security OSI –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Castro, Welch, Van Hollen, Jacobs Demand U.S. Security Companies Answer for Deadly Actions in Gaza

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Joaquin Castro (20th District of Texas)

    July 31, 2025

    Bicameral lawmakers warn Safe Reach Solutions (SRS) and UG Solutions (UG) that they have put American veterans at risk of criminal and civil liability for de facto “military operations” in Gaza

    WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, U.S. Representatives Joaquin Castro (TX-20) and Sara Jacobs (CA-51) joined U.S. Senators Peter Welch (D-VT) and Chris Van Hollen (D-MD) in leading an effort to demand answers from U.S.-based security companies, Safe Reach Solutions, LLC (SRS) and UG Solutions, LLC (UG) about their activities in Gaza, which according to press reports, include using lethal force against unarmed and starving Palestinian civilians at aid distribution sites.  

    The lawmakers warned SRS and UG that the companies and personnel—many of them American military veterans hired as private security contractors—may be subject to future criminal and civil liability under U.S. laws prohibiting torture, war crimes, and forced deportation. The lawmakers also requested the preservation of all documents and communication related to the security companies’ contracts and work with the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF). 

    “We were horrified by reporting this week on your companies’ deadly security operations in Gaza. Your operations have exposed hundreds of brave American veterans to future criminal and civil liability under U.S. laws criminalizing war crimes, torture, and forced deportation,” wrote the lawmakers. “Reports and firsthand witnesses have indicated to us that your personnel—American veterans hired as private security contractors—were brought into Israel on tourist visas inappropriate for the intended purpose of their travel, sent to Gaza armed for combat, and ordered by Israeli officials to use lethal force against unarmed and starving Palestinian civilians. We have also learned that under Israeli orders, your personnel are conducting crowd control at food distribution sites by firing live rounds over the heads of civilians and using stun grenades and pepper spray—all in an active military zone under direct supervision by Israeli military officers.” 

    The lawmakers continued: “As a result, we are deeply concerned that you may have failed to alert your personnel—or investors—of the immense legal risks they face for conducting what amounts to military operations on behalf of the Israeli government on land outside of the State of Israel.” 

    Read and download the letter here and below:  

    Mr. Govoni, Mr. Reilly,  

    We were horrified by reporting this week on your companies’ deadly security operations in Gaza. Your operations have exposed hundreds of brave American veterans to future criminal and civil liability under U.S. laws criminalizing war crimes, torture, and forced deportation.  

    Reports and firsthand witnesses have indicated to us that your personnel —American veterans hired as private security contractors—were brought into Israel on tourist visas inappropriate for the intended purpose of their travel, sent to Gaza armed for combat, and ordered by Israeli officials to use lethal force against unarmed and starving Palestinian civilians. We have also learned that under Israeli orders, your personnel are conducting crowd control at food distribution sites by firing live rounds over the heads of civilians and using stun grenades and pepper spray—all in an active military zone under direct supervision by Israeli military officers.  

    As a result, we are deeply concerned that you may have failed to alert your personnel —or investors—of the immense legal risks they face for conducting what amounts to military operations on behalf of the Israeli government on land outside of the State of Israel.   

    Even before the latest revelations, press had reported on Israeli military actions that include the wanton destruction of civilian homes, the use of human shields, rules of engagement resulting in disproportionate civilian casualties, and blockage of medicine and food. More than 50,000 children have already been killed or injured in Gaza, and as we write, infant boys and girls are starving to death. Prime Minister Netanyahu, in response to a question concerning remaining legitimate targets to strike, is reported to have said “I don’t care about the targets” and ordered military officials to “destroy the homes, bomb everything in Gaza. Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich is reported to have said, “Gaza will be totally destroyed… They will be totally despairing… and will be looking for relocation to begin a new life in other places.” As a result of these actions, U.S. allies have already cut off the supply of offensive weapons to Israel. 

    We, therefore, ask that you urgently respond to the following questions: 

    1. What are the Rules of Engagement currently in effect for your staff in Gaza and what is the nature of their command-and-control relationship with Israeli military officers and government officials? 
    1. Did you inform your investors and staff prior to their departure from the United States that they are subject to U.S. criminal law prohibiting torture, war crimes, and forced deportation, including under the War Crimes Act? And further, that they could be held legally responsible for crimes by Israeli forces when those actions were enabled or facilitated by your operations? 
    1. Did you inform prospective staff and investors that they could face civil suits upon return to the United States under the Torture Prevention Act by Americans and the families of Americans harmed in Gaza? 
    1. Did you inform your staff that the International Criminal Court and third states may exercise jurisdiction over war crimes in Gaza and that they could consider your American staff as combatants for purposes of liability, potentially limiting future freedom of travel to other countries?  
    1. How is your organization documenting activities in Gaza and what happens to that data? We request that you preserve all documents and communications related to your contracts and work with the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation.  

    We respectfully request a response withing two weeks.  

    Sincerely, 

     CC: 

    • Charles J. Africano (“Chuck”/“Joe”), Safe Reach Solutions (SRS) 
    • Kevin Sullivan, UG Solutions 
    • Jennifer C, UG Solutions 
    • Lou Rassey, Chief Executive Officer, McNally Capital, Chicago IL 
    • Ward McNally, Founder, Co-CEO, and Managing Partner, McNally Capital, Chicago IL 
    • Brian Grogan, Chief Financial Officer & Chief Compliance Officer, McNally Capital, Chicago IL 
    • Ravi Shah, Partner, McNally Capital, Chicago IL 
    • Joel Revill, Chief Executive Officer, Two Ocean Trust, Jackson Hole WY  
    • Albert Forkner, Chief Risk and Compliance Officer, Two Ocean Trust, Jackson Hole WY 
    • Dustin Sventy, Chief Investment Officer, Two Ocean Trust, Jackson Hole WY  

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-Evening Report: Shark tales, a sinking city and a breathless cop thriller: what to watch in August

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Alexa Scarlata, Lecturer, Digital Communication, RMIT University

    As the cool nights continue, it’s the perfect time to cozy up with a new batch of captivating films and series.

    This month’s streaming highlights bring a little bit of everything, from gripping true crime, to thought-provoking political drama, and a nostalgic music documentary on the life and times of piano man Billy Joel.

    So grab a blanket (and maybe a snack or two). Your next binge-watch awaits.

    One Night in Idaho: The College Murders

    Prime Video

    I remember seeing the gruesome 2022 murder of four college students in Moscow, Idaho, splashed all over the news in Australia. The world seemed momentarily gripped by the brutality of the killings, which happened in off-campus housing, while two other roommates slept downstairs.

    The ensuing investigation was given significantly less attention, though. So when Prime Video dropped this four-episode limited series, well, that was my weekend sorted.

    The docuseries features exclusive interviews with the friends and families of the victims, so it doesn’t feel gratuitous. It respectfully recounts the tragedy and explores its continued impact, while honouring the victims. It also builds the kind of tension and disquiet that is so beloved in the true crime genre, but not in a way that makes you feel gross watching it.

    Notably, legal proceedings for the case were still underway when One Night in Idaho was released. And the series made it clear there was more to the story which couldn’t be shared with, or by, the producers.

    However, the trial has since concluded, with more information now available for anyone wanting to dive deeper into the case. This makes the series an absorbing watch.

    – Alexa Scarlata

    The Night of the Hunter

    Various platforms

    In 1955, director Charles Laughton crafted The Night of the Hunter: one of the darkest, strangest fairy tales ever to come out of Hollywood.

    Shortly before Ben Harper is hanged for robbing a bank and killing two men, he hides the $10,000 loot in the toy doll of his young daughter Pearl. Only Pearl and her brother John know the secret – until the deranged serial killer-priest Harry Powell hears about the money and sets out to recover it.

    Harry marries Willa, Harper’s widow, and then, after killing her, pursues John and Pearl relentlessly across West Virginia.

    Robert Mitchum’s depiction of pure evil is one of cinema’s most vivid creations, with LOVE and HATE tattooed on the fingers of each hand.

    The film did not align with the mainstream tastes of the era. Audiences and reviewers didn’t know what to make of this abnormal mix of fairy tale logic, nightmarish imagery and biblical allegory.

    Successive generations of critics and filmmakers have caught on to its brilliance. Critic Roger Ebert said it was “one of the greatest of all American films”. In 2008, French film magazine Cahiers du cinéma voted it as the second-best film of all time, behind only Citizen Kane (1941).

    The Night of the Hunter remains unsettlingly modern, 70 years on.

    – Ben McCann



    Read more:
    After 70 years, twisted gothic thriller The Night of the Hunter remains as disturbing and beguiling as ever

    Families Like Ours

    SBS On Demand

    The highest point in Denmark, Mollehoj, is 171 metres above sea level, so it is plausible to imagine the whole country being overrun by water due to rising sea levels, leading to mass evacuation. This is the basic premise of the Danish series Families Like Ours.

    The cleverness of this premise is that it turns comfortable middle-class Danes into refugees, facing hostility, poverty and violence as they seek to resettle. Given Denmark’s hard line on refugees, this makes the series politically powerful, equally so for us in Australia.

    The central figure is a young woman, Laura (Amaryllis August), who creates disaster for her family through what she believes is an act of huge empathy. The same is true of Henrik (Magnus Millang), who shoots an innocent man in what he believes is an act of self-defence.

    Families Like Ours is not a comfortable series to watch, but it manages to raise central issues of our time, without ever seeming didactic or preachy. It succeeds in combining the personal and the political in a six-part show that is powerful – and leaves enough loose ends for a potential second season.

    – Dennis Altman

    The Man from Hong Kong

    Various platforms

    A cinematic firecracker of a film exploded onto international screens 50 years ago, blending martial arts mayhem, Bond-esque set pieces, casual racism – and a distinctly Australian swagger.

    From its audacious visual style; to its complex, life-threatening stunts; to its pioneering status as an international co-production, Brian Trenchard-Smith’s The Man from Hong Kong has solidified its place as a cult classic.

    A Sydney-based crime lord’s activities come under the scrutiny of a determined Hong Kong detective, Inspector Fang Sing Leng. A fiery East-meets-West martial arts showdown explodes across the Australian landscape, pushing both sides to their limits.

    The movie is a playful pastiche that confidently combines martial arts action, police procedurals, spy thrillers, and Westerns, all filtered through a distinctly Australian “crash-zoom” lens.

    The film was an influence to Quentin Tarantino and paved the way for films such as Mad Max (1979), particularly in what Trenchard-Smith and his partner in film, stunt legend Grant Page, might call its “cunning stunts”.

    The elaborate car chases and explosive stunt setups in The Man from Hong Kong served as prototypes for iconic sequences that would inspire the Mad Max films, among others, a testament to a bygone era of practical effects and thrill seeking audacity.

    The Man from Hong Kong remains an exhilarating piece of pure cinema, despite its relatively small budget. It’s an exemplar (and occasional cautionary tale) for filmmakers in terms of international co-production, its cunning stunts, and genre blending.

    – Gregory Ferris



    Read more:
    The Man from Hong Kong at 50: how the first ever Australian–Hong Kong co-production became a cult classic

    Dept Q

    Netflix

    Based on the book series by Jussi Adler-Olsen, Dept Q is a gripping television adaptation for fans of Nordic noir and British crime drama.

    In Edinburgh, Scotland, Detective Chief Inspector Carl Morck (Matthew Goode) has returned to work after a shooting which left him physically and psychologically wounded, his colleague partially paralysed, and another colleague dead.

    With the dregs of a budget assigned to cold cases, and a team of misfit officers, Morck sets out to solve the four-year-old case of missing Crown prosecutor, Merritt Lingard (Chloe Pirrie).

    We follow Merritt’s story across various stages of her life. We see her as a teenager in the lead-up to a devastating crime that left her brother with a traumatic brain injury, as well as later in life, when she loses a major case involving a wealthy man on trial for his wife’s death.

    Shortly after the devastating verdict, Merritt went missing on a ferry ride to her childhood home, on the fictionalised island of Mhòr. Returning to the present, we see she has been held captive inside a hyperbaric chamber for the past four years.

    The pressure under which Merritt is kept makes Morck’s investigation high stakes from the start, while the movement between past and present highlights the impacts of past traumatic events on both characters.

    Dept Q is a fast-paced, breathless thriller which will leave viewers craving its rumoured second season.

    – Jessica Gildersleeve

    Billy Joel: And So It Goes

    HBO Max

    Produced by Tom Hanks, this two-part documentary about singer/songwriter Billy Joel covers more than five decades of music. Created very much from Joel’s perspective, who is also the main narrator, the archival content is fascinating, and the music difficult to deny.

    Discussion of Joel’s early suicide attempts are a shocking and terrible reminder of how different things might have been. From here, the role of the women in his life – his wives, daughters, and mother (“his champion”) – becomes vital. Beyond the headlines (particularly with his second wife Christie Brinkley), are partners who were muses, business supporters and emotional support pillars – some of whom gave Joel ultimatums when the time came to battle his alcohol addiction.

    Brinkley, as well as Joel’s first wife, Elizabeth Weber, are particularly moving interviewees. They would wait at home, or stand nervously backstage as Joel “went to work” to earn, repair and rebuild against the odds. No spoilers, but let’s just say Joel ended up in trouble more than once.

    On the other hand, the men in Joel’s life are often distant: Jewish grandparents who escaped Nazi Germany; a father who left when Joel was small; a half-brother discovered later in life. These losses are never really healed.

    Billy Joel: And So It Goes is a five-hour epic, a story of survival and ultimately, of peace. It is, of course, also a reminder of an incredible catalogue of music – joyful, ordinary and wonderful – and the extraordinary life behind it.

    – Liz Giuffre

    If you or someone you know needs help, contact Lifeline on 13 11 14

    Gardening Australia, season 36

    ABC iView

    Since it first aired in 1990, Gardening Australia has offered tips and inspiration from every state and territory on a weekly basis. A perennial favourite, the show seems to possess perpetual appeal for world-weary viewers open to slowing down by growing plants.

    The no-nonsense host Peter Cundall helmed the series until 2008 (Cundall died in 2021 at the age of 94). The honour of “King of Compost” now rests with the gregarious Costa Georgiadis, and a wider cast of presenters that has expanded to be more diverse and engaging. One stalwart from the start, Jane Edmanson, is still flourishing in season 36: her episode 4 segment titled “Fronds with Benefits” certainly caught my eye.

    Topics covered this season range from small-space innovation and passion projects, to Indigenous knowledge and bush foods, through to permaculture and climate change. Episodes 6 and 20 – specials on native plants and NAIDOC Week, respectively – are both worth a watch.

    While the series can distance renters, and might not be edgy enough for younger audiences, it has managed to stake out ground in the digital realm – with a blooming online presence for budding green thumbs.

    One of the longest-running Australian shows still on air, it doesn’t look as though Gardening Australia will be pulling up roots anytime soon.

    – Phoebe Hart

    The Buccaneers, season two

    Apple TV

    Loosen your corsets, The Buccaneers is back for a second season of feminist sisterhood and fabulous gowns.

    Adapted from Edith Wharton’s unfinished final novel, the series follows a group of outspoken young American women navigating the marriage market in 1870s Victorian England. Gleefully anachronistic with feisty girl power speeches and a contemporary pop music soundtrack, The Buccaneers is equal parts Bridgerton and Gossip Girl (complete with a character played by Leighton Meester).

    Season two picks up where the first left off, with Jinny (Imogen Waterhouse) and Guy (Matthew Broome) fleeing the country to escape Jinny’s violent husband Lord James Seadown (Barney Fishwick).

    Meanwhile, sister Nan (Kristine Froseth) is busy back home leveraging her position as Duchess of Tintagel to help facilitate Jinny’s return – a campaign that includes wearing a showstopping red gown to a black and white ball. In keeping with the series’ M.O., this might be narrative nonsense, but it looks exquisite.

    While trysts and love triangles continue to provide escapist entertainment, Jinny’s abusive marriage dominates later episodes. If season one sought to expose the isolation and entrapment Jinny endured in her marriage, season two foregrounds her resistance in the face of it, intent on highlighting how perpetrators of violence manipulate legal and medical systems to tighten the noose around victims’ necks.

    Season two’s veering between frothy excess and melodrama arguably results in some tonal patchiness. Nonetheless, it should be commended for its careful treatment of the corrosive impacts and dangers of coercive control. This – more than the downloadable soundtrack and dazzling costumes – makes it good viewing.

    – Rachel Williamson

    Dangerous Animals

    Prime Video

    Dangerous Animals is perhaps the most original and entertaining shark horror film we have seen since Jaws – incorporating traditional elements of the shark thriller genre, while challenging them at the same time.

    The film starts with the primal fear of being eaten alive by monstrous sharks, with gruesome shock-thrill scenes of tourists being torn apart in a blood red ocean.

    But later, the narrative reminds us it is the boat captain, not the great white, who is the real sadistic killer. Predictably, we see a young bikini-clad woman who gets horribly dismembered (just like the first unforgettable victim in Jaws).

    However, it is also a fearless bikini-clad woman, Zephyr (Hassie Harrison) who turns the tables on the boat captain, outwits him, rescues her boyfriend and even makes friends with the shark.

    Dangerous Animals includes some interesting subtext and commentary, such as when it compares women to fish – creatures hunted for sport – and when it highlights the inherent cruelty of fishing, and the hook that impales the prey.

    The film delivers sophisticated special effects and gruesome eco-horror entertainment. It is a fun, self-aware and postmodern watch that will leave you thinking.

    The Australian influence is delightfully evident in the irreverent humour. And for anyone who has been to the Gold Coast, there is much pleasure in seeing the film play out across its iconic locations.

    This film will trigger your childhood fear of Jaws – but with a twist.

    – Susan Hopkins

    Shark Whisperer

    Netflix

    In Shark Whisperer, the great white shark gets an image makeover – from Jaws villain to misunderstood friend and admirer.

    However the star of the documentary is not so much the shark, but the model and marine conservationist Ocean Ramsey (yes, that’s her real name).

    The film centres on Ramsey’s self-growth journey, with the shark co-starring as a quasi-spiritual medium for finding meaning and purpose (not to mention celebrity status).

    Whisperer and the Ocean Ramsey website tap into the collective fascination with dangerous sharks fuelled by popular culture. Many online images show Ramsey in a bikini or touching sharks – she’s small, and vulnerable in the face of great whites. As with forms of celebrity humanitarianism, what I have dubbed “sexy conservationism” leaves itself open to criticism about its methods – even if its intentions are good.

    Globally at least 80 million sharks are killed every year. Thanks in part to the hashtag activism of Ocean Ramsey and her millions of fans and followers, Hawaii was the first state in the United States to outlaw shark fishing.

    So, Ramsey may be right to argue her ends justify the means.

    – Susan Hopkins



    Read more:
    Netflix’s Shark Whisperer wants us to think ‘sexy conservation’ is the way to save sharks – does it have a point?

    The authors do not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and have disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    – ref. Shark tales, a sinking city and a breathless cop thriller: what to watch in August – https://theconversation.com/shark-tales-a-sinking-city-and-a-breathless-cop-thriller-what-to-watch-in-august-261952

    MIL OSI Analysis – EveningReport.nz –

  • MIL-Evening Report: Colombia is producing more cocaine than ever – and more is reaching Australian shores

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Cesar Alvarez, Lecturer in Terrorism and Security Studies, Charles Sturt University

    Members of the Colombian anti-narcotics police test cocaine after a drug bust. RAUL ARBOLEDA/AFP via Getty Images

    Imagine an area larger than the Australian Capital Territory, nearly twice the size of London and four times that of New York City covered in coca plantations.

    That’s the scale of Colombia’s coca cultivation, according to an estimate from the United Nations Office of Drugs and Crime (UNODC).

    Colombia produces an estimated 2,664 metric tonnes of cocaine annually. That is enough to fill 20 Boeing 747 cargo planes per year.

    Not even during the darkest days of Pablo Escobar’s infamous empire did Colombia cultivate as much coca or produce as much cocaine as it does today.

    In the past year alone, coca crops expanded by 10% and production capacity soared more than 50%.

    So how did it come to this?

    A worrying mix

    Colombia did not arrive at this point overnight, nor by chance. A complex mix of radical and failed policy shifts, scientific innovation and global demand, among other factors, has shaped this trajectory.

    For example, in 2015, Colombia’s Constitutional Court suspended aerial fumigation and banned the use of glyphosate. Despite the herbicide’s effectiveness in killing coca plants, the court cited concerns over its health risks and environmental impact.

    Aerial spraying had allowed the government to reduce the risk that manual eradication brigades were exposed to over large areas.

    In 2016, then-president Juan Manuel Santos introduced a scheme to substitute coca with non-illicit plants. Incentives were offered to farmers. However, it ended up encouraging many peasants who had never grown coca before to begin cultivating it, simply to qualify for the new subsidies.

    It is no surprise that during Santos’ second term (2014–18), Colombia’s coca crops nearly doubled, from 96,000 hectares to more than 170,000.

    This was all in an effort to secure a peace deal with the narco-terrorist group Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC).

    More recently, in 2022, President Gustavo Petro announced his Paz Total (Total Peace) policy. This was designed to bring trafficking organisations – including Colombia’s second largest narco-terrorist group, the National Liberation Army (ELN) – to the negotiation table.

    Ironically, and paradoxically, Colombia is now producing more drugs than ever. It is also experiencing a sharp increase in violence by non-state armed groups.

    The impact on Australia

    What happens in Colombia matters to Australia because criminal innovation is fuelling greater cocaine volumes and higher purity. This means more is flowing towards Australian shores.

    Colombia’s coca production is being reshaped by enhanced cultivation techniques, more secure and autonomous smuggling methods, and an increasingly fragmented criminal landscape.

    Production is now more efficient and profitable than ever. Growers are planting improved coca leaf varieties and achieve more harvest cycles per year with higher alkaloid yields per kilo.

    Smuggling methods have also evolved.

    Semi-submersibles or narco-submarines are increasing in storage capacity. Recent seizures show manned vessels with four to five tonnes of capacity are now the rule rather than the exception.

    Some networks are also transitioning from manned to unmanned operations.

    Also, the growing presence and operational influence of Mexican cartels in Colombia has amplified the scope and scale of alliances between transnational organised crime groups across Europe, Asia and Oceania. International police investigations are even more complex.

    Like much of the world, there is a growing demand for and increasing use of cocaine in Australia.

    Despite record-high seizure numbers and total volumes intercepted, Australia is still among the most attractive destination markets for drug trafficking organisations because of the high price users pay for the drugs.

    Unless something radically changes in Colombia, Australia continues to face growing risks from maritime trafficking routes. There is also an increased threat of being used as a transit and money laundering hub in the global drug economy.

    Some possible solutions

    Even if conditions in Colombia were to change swiftly and drastically, supply-focused strategies alone are insufficient to mitigate the risks facing Australia.

    After all, Colombia cannot simply fumigate its way out of this cocaine crisis, just as Australia cannot arrest its way out of it.

    However, continued collaboration between the Australian Federal Police and the National Police of Colombia remains essential to keep drugs at bay.

    The appointment of Colombia’s first police attaché to Australia will be a welcome and meaningful step forward. (While not yet formally announced, the Colombian embassy in Australia has informed me and several other experts the country is appointing the attaché.)

    Both countries must deepen this relationship and collectively engage meaningfully and frequently to help solve the problem.

    Cesar Alvarez does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    – ref. Colombia is producing more cocaine than ever – and more is reaching Australian shores – https://theconversation.com/colombia-is-producing-more-cocaine-than-ever-and-more-is-reaching-australian-shores-261745

    MIL OSI Analysis – EveningReport.nz –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Senators Budd, Gillibrand, Lummis Introduce Bipartisan Bill to Stop Illegal Use of Digital Assets by Criminals and Terrorists

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator Ted Budd (R-North Carolina)

    Washington, D.C.—U.S. Senator Ted Budd (R-N.C.) was joined by Senators Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) and Cynthia Lummis (R-Wyo.) in reintroducing the Financial Technology Protection Act. The bipartisan bill aims to address the illegal use of financial technologies and digital assets to prevent sanctions evasion, terrorist financing, and money laundering.

    “While financial technologies are driving innovation and expanding individual freedom, criminals and terrorists are exploiting digital assets – putting both our financial and national security at risk. We must take these threats seriously and work toward solutions that put a stop to this rampant criminal activity. I introduced the bipartisan Financial Technology Protection Act to do just that, because we cannot continue to ignore this illicit abuse or hinder this pro-growth technology. I urge my colleagues to support this legislation before these crimes and threats escalate further,” said Senator Budd.

    “As financial technology continues to evolve, we must ensure it strengthens, not threatens, our national security. The bipartisan Financial Technology Protection Act would establish an independent working group that brings together government agencies, regulators, and industry experts to proactively identify emerging risks and develop robust, innovative solutions. This collaborative discourse will ensure we can keep our financial systems safe while bolstering the United States’ leadership on digital asset innovation on the global stage. This bipartisan legislation has already passed the House four times, including a unanimous vote in House Financial Services earlier this month. I look forward to working with Senator Budd to advance it in the Senate,” said Senator Gillibrand.

    “Digital assets are the future of American financial innovation and it is critical that as we craft pro-growth legislation that we also maintain security standards. The Financial Technology Protection Act strikes the right balance of developing safeguards against illicit activities without stifling the innovation that makes our digital economy thrive. I am proud to join Senator Budd in securing America’s position as a leader in the digital asset space while protecting consumers and maintaining the integrity of our financial system,” said Senator Lummis.   

    Read the full bill text HERE.

    BACKGROUND 

    Financial Technology Protection Act:

    • Establishes an independent working group to combat terrorism and illicit financing, made up of:
      • Representatives from the following agencies: Department of the Treasury, Office of Terrorism and Financial Intelligence, Internal Revenue Service, Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Secret Service, Office of the Director of National Intelligence, and Drug Enforcement Administration.
      • Private sector participation from: Financial Technology Companies, Blockchain Intelligence Companies, Financial Institutions, Research Organizations, and Privacy and Civil Liberties Organizations.

    Senator Budd’s legislation was included in the Senate’s market structure bill, led by Senate Subcommittee on Digital Assets Chair Lummis. This legislative package will provide the crypto industry with the regulatory certainty needed to unlock new investments and innovation.

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI Australia: The Creators 2025 Participants Announced

    Source: NSW Government puts trust in NAB to transform banking and payments

    31 07 2025 – Media release

    Top (L-R): Tamara Asmar, Anna Barnes and Sarah Bassiuoni.Bottom (L-R): Glen Dolman, Michelle Offen, Jessica Tuckwell and Monica Zanetti.
    Screen Australia and the Australian Writers’ Guild (AWG) have announced the seven participants selected for The Creators 2025, a dynamic career acceleration program for high-calibre Australian screenwriters.
    The seven participants in The Creators program are:

    Tamara Asmar (NCIS: Sydney, Love Me, In Limbo)
    Anna Barnes (Safe Home, The Twelve, Content)
    Sarah Bassiuoni (Critical Incident, House of Gods, The Secrets She Keeps)
    Glen Dolman (Bloom, I Met A Girl, The Bill)
    Michelle Offen (East West 101, Hyde & Seek, Miss Fisher’s Murder Mysteries)
    Jessica Tuckwell (Bump, Fake, Year Of)
    Monica Zanetti (While the Men Are Away, Ellie & Abby (& Ellie’s Dead Aunt), Iggy & Ace)

    Building on the success of years one and two, this third year will provide participants with high-level showrunner training, project and pitching development, equipping them to sell their stories in both domestic and international markets. 
    The program will be led by Emmy Award-winner Jeff Melvoin (Northern Exposure, Killing Eve, Designated Survivor), founder and Chair of the Writers Guild of America’s highly competitive Showrunner Training Program, who will travel to Sydney in October to deliver bespoke WGA-style training.
    Screen Australia Head of Development Bobby Romia said, “The Creators provides a unique opportunity for Australian screenwriters to hone their craft, build important connections and develop their distinctive projects setting them up for success here and abroad. We’re proud of this partnership and can’t wait to see what this talented cohort achieve.”
    AWG President Peter Mattessi said, “The Australian Writers’ Guild is thrilled to support a third cohort of screenwriters developing their craft through The Creators. This program continues to deliver outstanding outcomes for writers who are ready to take the next step in their careers as showrunners, empowering them to become creative powerhouses and leaders in our industry. We’re delighted to work in partnership with Screen Australia and Scripted Ink, and thank them for their continued support of writers as key creatives in the screen industry.”
    Scripted Ink’s Shane Brennan said, “Just as the WGA showrunner training program is highly sought after in the US, we’re proud that the Creators has firmly established itself as the premier career initiative for Australian screenwriters. A writer’s vision and the craft of storytelling are at the core of commercially successful television, and this program equips our best writers with the skills and understanding necessary to nurture a story through all stages of production.”
    Tamara Asmar said, “The world is in deeply unsettling times, and the power of storytelling to move and inspire audiences is needed more than ever. I’m so grateful to Screen Australia and the AWG for centring Australian writers and providing us with the opportunity to immerse ourselves in this unique program with global industry leaders. Writing is often such a lonely vocation, and I’m excited to see what everyone brings to the table and watch the evolution of the projects over the week.”
    Anna Barnes said, “The Creators Initiative is a dream opportunity for me to upskill and learn more about the role of the showrunner from both international leaders of our industry and also from this extremely talented group of fellow writers.” 
    Sarah Bassiuoni said, “This program is an incredible opportunity to learn directly from those who’ve shaped some of the most compelling television globally – not just in writing, but in leading projects from concept to completion. As someone passionate about bold, character-driven storytelling, I’m excited to strengthen both my creative and production skills and to bring that knowledge home to help grow a more empowered and diverse Australian screen industry. It’s about making space for voices, leadership, and stories that reflect the full depth of who we are.”
    Glen Dolman said, “As our industry contracts globally and the need for Australian stories to reach a worldwide audience becomes even more critical, this program offers a rare opportunity to connect with fellow writer/producers, share knowledge, and explore best practices — particularly through the lens of the US showrunner model. With the most successful breakout shows internationally led by distinct creative voices who bring both authorship and continuity to a project, I’m thrilled to be part of this group and conversation.”
    Michelle Offen said, “I am absolutely thrilled and grateful for this opportunity. Pathways to upskill as a showrunner in Australia are rare, which makes The Creators so incredibly valuable. Joining this talented cohort, under the tutelage of the renowned Jeff Melvoin, is an experience I will relish.  I look forward to applying lessons learned and sharing the knowledge with co-collaborators and writing teams. Thank you AWG, Scripted Ink and Screen Australia – what a gift.”
    Jessica Tuckwell said, “Thanks to AWG and Screen Australia for the opportunity to investigate leadership within that crucial place where the vision clashes with the realities of production, where the show is really made. We owe audiences the respect of maintaining creative integrity, and part of that is acknowledging that dropping the writer/creator off at the curb when pre-production starts is such an obvious inefficiency; we are a problem-solving asset at every stage of the process.”
    Monica Zanetti said, “I’m so thrilled to be part of the Creators program for 2025. I feel so lucky to have the support of this team as I take the next big step in my career from creator to showrunner.”
    The Creators is supported by industry partner Scripted Ink.  
    Media enquiries
    Jessica Parry | Senior Publicist (Mon, Tue, Thu)
    + 61 428 767 836  | [email protected]
    All other general/non-media enquiries
    Sydney + 61 2 8113 5800  |  Melbourne + 61 3 8682 1900 | [email protected]

    MIL OSI News –

  • MIL-OSI: Shell Plc 2nd QUARTER 2025 HALF YEAR UNAUDITED RESULTS

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

                                 
    SHELL PLC
     2nd QUARTER 2025 AND HALF YEAR UNAUDITED RESULTS    		        
                                                         
     
    SUMMARY OF UNAUDITED RESULTS
    Quarters $ million   Half year
    Q2 2025 Q1 2025 Q2 2024 %¹   Reference 2025 2024 %
    3,601    4,780    3,517    -25 Income/(loss) attributable to Shell plc shareholders   8,381    10,874    -23
    4,264    5,577    6,293    -24 Adjusted Earnings A 9,841    14,027    -30
    13,313    15,250    16,806    -13 Adjusted EBITDA A 28,563    35,517    -20
    11,937    9,281    13,508    +29 Cash flow from operating activities   21,218    26,838    -21
    (5,406)   (3,959)   (3,338)     Cash flow from investing activities   (9,365)   (6,866)    
    6,531    5,322    10,170      Free cash flow G 11,853    19,972     
    5,817    4,175    4,719      Cash capital expenditure C 9,993    9,211     
    8,265    8,575    8,950    -4 Operating expenses F 16,840    17,947    -6
    8,145    8,453    8,651    -4 Underlying operating expenses F 16,598    17,704    -6
    9.4% 10.4% 12.8%   ROACE D 9.4% 12.8%  
    75,675    76,511    75,468      Total debt E 75,675    75,468     
    43,216    41,521    38,314      Net debt E 43,216    38,314     
    19.1% 18.7% 17.0%   Gearing E 19.1% 17.0%  
    2,682    2,838    2,817    -5 Oil and gas production available for sale (thousand boe/d)   2,760    2,864    -4
    0.61    0.79    0.55 -23 Basic earnings per share ($)   1.40    1.70    -18
    0.72    0.92    0.99    -22 Adjusted Earnings per share ($) B 1.64    2.19    -25
    0.3580    0.3580    0.3440    — Dividend per share ($)   0.7160    0.6880    +4

    1.Q2 on Q1 change

    Quarter Analysis1

    Income attributable to Shell plc shareholders, compared with the first quarter 2025, reflected lower trading and optimisation margins and lower realised liquids and gas prices, partly offset by higher Marketing margins and lower operating expenses.

    Second quarter 2025 income attributable to Shell plc shareholders also included impairment charges, gains on disposal of assets and favourable movements due to the fair value accounting of commodity derivatives. These items are included in identified items amounting to a net loss of $0.3 billion in the quarter. This compares with identified items in the first quarter 2025 which amounted to a net loss of $0.8 billion.

    Adjusted Earnings and Adjusted EBITDA2 were driven by the same factors as income attributable to Shell plc shareholders and adjusted for the above identified items and the cost of supplies adjustment of $0.3 billion.

    Cash flow from operating activities for the second quarter 2025 was $11.9 billion and primarily driven by Adjusted EBITDA. This inflow was partly offset by tax payments of $3.4 billion.

    Cash flow from investing activities for the second quarter 2025 was an outflow of $5.4 billion, and included cash capital expenditure of $5.8 billion. This outflow was partly offset by interest received of $0.5 billion.

    Net debt and Gearing: At the end of the second quarter 2025, net debt was $43.2 billion, compared with $41.5 billion at the end of the first quarter 2025. This reflects free cash flow of $6.5 billion, more than offset by share buybacks of $3.5 billion, cash dividends paid to Shell plc shareholders of $2.1 billion, lease additions of $1.4 billion and interest payments of $1.2 billion. Gearing was 19.1% at the end of the second quarter 2025, compared with 18.7% at the end of the first quarter 2025, mainly driven by higher net debt.

    Shareholder distributions

    Total shareholder distributions in the quarter amounted to $5.7 billion comprising repurchases of shares of $3.5 billion and cash dividends paid to Shell plc shareholders of $2.1 billion. Dividends to be paid to Shell plc shareholders for the

    SHELL PLC
    2nd QUARTER 2025 AND HALF YEAR UNAUDITED RESULTS

    second quarter 2025 amount to $0.3580 per share. Shell has now completed $3.5 billion of share buybacks announced in the first quarter 2025 results announcement. Today, Shell announces a share buyback programme of $3.5 billion which is expected to be completed by the third quarter 2025 results announcement.

    Half Year Analysis1

    Income attributable to Shell plc shareholders, compared with the first half 2024, reflected lower trading and optimisation margins, lower realised liquids and LNG prices, and lower refining and chemical margins, partly offset by lower operating expenses and favourable tax movements.

    Our continued focus on performance, discipline and simplification has helped deliver $3.9 billion of pre-tax structural cost reductions3 since 2022. Of these reductions, $0.8 billion was delivered in the first half 2025.

    First half 2025 income attributable to Shell plc shareholders also included impairment charges, a charge related to the UK Energy Profits Levy and favourable movements due to the fair value accounting of commodity derivatives. These items are included in identified items amounting to a net loss of $1.2 billion. This compares with identified items in the first half 2024 which amounted to a net loss of $3.3 billion.

    Adjusted Earnings and Adjusted EBITDA2 for the first half 2025 were driven by the same factors as income attributable to Shell plc shareholders and adjusted for identified items and the cost of supplies adjustment of $0.3 billion.

    Cash flow from operating activities for the first half 2025 was $21.2 billion, and primarily driven by Adjusted EBITDA. This inflow was partly offset by tax payments of $6.3 billion and working capital outflows of $3.0 billion.

    Cash flow from investing activities for the first half 2025 was an outflow of $9.4 billion and included cash capital expenditure of $10.0 billion, and net other investing cash outflows of $0.9 billion, which included the drawdowns on loan facilities provided at completion of the sale of The Shell Petroleum Development Company of Nigeria Limited (SPDC) in Nigeria. These outflows were partly offset by interest received of $1.0 billion.

    This Unaudited Condensed Interim Financial Report, together with supplementary financial and operational disclosure for this quarter, is available at www.shell.com/investors 4.

    1.All earnings amounts are shown post-tax, unless stated otherwise.

    2.Adjusted EBITDA is without taxation, exploration well write-offs and depreciation, depletion and amortisation (DD&A) expenses.

    3.Structural cost reductions describe decreases in underlying operating expenses as a result of operational efficiencies, divestments, workforce reductions and other cost-saving measures that are expected to be sustainable compared with 2022 levels.

    4.Not incorporated by reference.

    PORTFOLIO DEVELOPMENTS

    Integrated Gas

    In June 2025, we announced that the first cargo of liquefied natural gas (LNG) had left the LNG Canada facility on the west coast of Canada. Shell has a 40% working interest in the LNG Canada joint venture. Located in Kitimat, British Columbia, the facility will export LNG from two processing units or “trains” with a total capacity of 14 million tonnes per annum (mtpa).

    Upstream

    In May 2025, we completed the previously announced agreement to increase our working interest in the Shell-operated Ursa platform in the Gulf of America from 45.39% to 61.35%.

    In May 2025, we announced the start of production at the floating production storage and offloading facility (FPSO) Alexandre de Gusmão in the Mero field in the Santos Basin offshore Brazil. The unitized Mero field is operated by Petrobras (38.6%), in partnership with Shell Brasil (19.3%), TotalEnergies (19.3%), CNPC (9.65%), CNOOC (9.65%) and Pré-Sal Petróleo S.A. (PPSA) (3.5%) representing the Government in the non-contracted area.

    In May 2025, we signed an agreement to acquire a 12.5% interest in the OML 118 Production Sharing Contract (OML 118 PSC) from TotalEnergies EP Nigeria Limited. Upon completion, Shell’s working interest in the OML 118 PSC is expected to increase from 55% to a maximum of 67.5%.

    Chemicals and Products

    In April 2025, we completed the previously announced sale of our Energy and Chemicals Park in Singapore to CAPGC Pte. Ltd. (CAPGC), a joint venture between Chandra Asri Capital Pte. Ltd. and Glencore Asian Holdings Pte. Ltd.

    In April 2025, we agreed to sell our 16.125% interest in Colonial Enterprises, Inc. (“Colonial”) to Colossus AcquireCo LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P. and its institutional partners (collectively, “Brookfield”), for $1.45 billion. The transaction is subject to regulatory approvals.

             Page 2

    SHELL PLC
    2nd QUARTER 2025 AND HALF YEAR UNAUDITED RESULTS

    PERFORMANCE BY SEGMENT

                                                         
     
    INTEGRATED GAS        
    Quarters $ million   Half year
    Q2 2025 Q1 2025 Q2 2024 %¹   Reference 2025 2024 %
                     
    1,838    2,789    2,454    -34 Income/(loss) for the period   4,627    5,215    -11
    101    306    (220)     Of which: Identified items A 407    (1,139)    
    1,737    2,483    2,675    -30 Adjusted Earnings A 4,220    6,354    -34
    3,875    4,735    5,039    -18 Adjusted EBITDA A 8,610    11,175    -23
    3,629    3,463    4,183    +5 Cash flow from operating activities A 7,092    8,895    -20
    1,196    1,116    1,151      Cash capital expenditure C 2,313    2,192     
    129    126    137    +2 Liquids production available for sale (thousand b/d)   128    137    -7
    4,545    4,644    4,885    -2 Natural gas production available for sale (million scf/d)   4,594    4,919 -7
    913    927    980    -2 Total production available for sale (thousand boe/d)   920    986    -7
    6.72    6.60    6.95    +2 LNG liquefaction volumes (million tonnes)   13.32    14.53    -8
    17.77    16.49    16.41    +8 LNG sales volumes (million tonnes)   34.26    33.28    +3

    1.Q2 on Q1 change

    Integrated Gas includes liquefied natural gas (LNG), conversion of natural gas into gas-to-liquids (GTL) fuels and other products. It includes natural gas and liquids exploration and extraction, and the operation of the upstream and midstream infrastructure necessary to deliver these to market. Integrated Gas also includes the marketing, trading and optimisation of LNG.

    Quarter Analysis1

    Income/(loss) for the period was driven by the same factors as Adjusted Earnings and includes identified items.

    Adjusted Earnings, compared with the first quarter 2025, reflected the combined effect of lower contributions from trading and optimisation and lower realised prices (decrease of $589 million), and higher depreciation, depletion and amortisation expenses (increase of $162 million).

    Identified items in the second quarter 2025 included favourable movements of $454 million due to the fair value accounting of commodity derivatives, partly offset by impairment charges of $423 million. These favourable movements and impairment charges compare with the first quarter 2025 which included favourable movements of $362 million due to the fair value accounting of commodity derivatives. As part of Shell’s normal business, commodity derivative contracts are entered into as hedges for mitigation of economic exposures on future purchases, sales and inventory.

    Adjusted EBITDA2 was driven by the same factors as Adjusted Earnings.

    Cash flow from operating activities for the second quarter 2025 was primarily driven by Adjusted EBITDA, net cash inflows related to derivatives of $542 million and working capital inflows of $352 million. These inflows were partly offset by tax payments of $967 million.

    Total oil and gas production, compared with the first quarter 2025, decreased by 2% mainly due to higher planned maintenance across the portfolio. LNG liquefaction volumes increased by 2% mainly due to ramp-up in Australia, following unplanned maintenance and weather constraints in the first quarter, partly offset by higher planned maintenance across the portfolio.

    Half Year Analysis1

    Income/(loss) for the period was driven by the same factors as Adjusted Earnings and includes identified items.

    Adjusted Earnings, compared with the first half 2024, reflected the combined effect of lower contributions from trading and optimisation and lower realised prices (decrease of $1,894 million), lower volumes (decrease of $373 million), and higher depreciation, depletion and amortisation expenses (increase of $120 million), partly offset by lower operating expenses (decrease of $107 million), and favourable deferred tax movements ($99 million).

    Identified items in the first half 2025 included favourable movements of $817 million due to the fair value accounting of commodity derivatives, partly offset by impairment charges of $423 million. These favourable movements and charges are part of identified items and compare with the first half 2024 which included unfavourable movements of $985 million due

             Page 3

    SHELL PLC
    2nd QUARTER 2025 AND HALF YEAR UNAUDITED RESULTS

    to the fair value accounting of commodity derivatives. As part of Shell’s normal business, commodity derivative contracts are entered into for mitigation of economic exposures on future purchases, sales and inventory.

    Adjusted EBITDA2 was driven by the same factors as Adjusted Earnings.

    Cash flow from operating activities for the first half 2025 was primarily driven by Adjusted EBITDA, and net cash inflows related to derivatives of $1,084 million. These inflows were partly offset by tax payments of $1,741 million and working capital outflows of $335 million.

    Total oil and gas production, compared with the first half 2024, decreased by 7% mainly due to higher maintenance across the portfolio and weather constraints in Australia. LNG liquefaction volumes decreased by 8% mainly due to higher maintenance across the portfolio.

    1.All earnings amounts are shown post-tax, unless stated otherwise.

    2.Adjusted EBITDA is without taxation, exploration well write-offs and DD&A expenses.

             Page 4

    SHELL PLC
    2nd QUARTER 2025 AND HALF YEAR UNAUDITED RESULTS

                                                         
     
    UPSTREAM          
    Quarters $ million   Half year
    Q2 2025 Q1 2025 Q2 2024 %¹   Reference 2025 2024 %
                     
    2,008    2,080    2,179    -3 Income/(loss) for the period   4,088    4,451    -8
    276    (257)   (157)     Of which: Identified items A 19    182     
    1,732    2,337    2,336    -26 Adjusted Earnings A 4,068    4,270    -5
    6,638    7,387    7,829    -10 Adjusted EBITDA A 14,024    15,717    -11
    6,500    3,945    5,739    +65 Cash flow from operating activities A 10,445    11,466    -9
    2,826    1,923    1,829      Cash capital expenditure C 4,749    3,839     
    1,334    1,335    1,297    — Liquids production available for sale (thousand b/d)   1,334    1,314    +2
    2,310    3,020    2,818    -24 Natural gas production available for sale (million scf/d)   2,663    2,977    -11
    1,732    1,855    1,783    -7 Total production available for sale (thousand boe/d)   1,793    1,828    -2

    1.Q2 on Q1 change

    The Upstream segment includes exploration and extraction of crude oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids. It also markets and transports oil and gas, and operates the infrastructure necessary to deliver them to the market.

    Quarter Analysis1

    Income/(loss) for the period was driven by the same factors as Adjusted Earnings and includes identified items.

    Adjusted Earnings, compared with the first quarter 2025, reflected lower realised liquids and gas prices (decrease of $594 million) and higher depreciation, depletion and amortisation expenses (increase of $154 million), partly offset by higher volumes (increase of $112 million).

    Identified items in the second quarter 2025 included gains of $350 million from disposal of assets. These favourable movements compare with the first quarter 2025 which included a charge of $509 million related to the UK Energy Profits Levy, partly offset by gains of $159 million from disposal of assets and gains of $95 million related to the impact of the strengthening Brazilian real on a deferred tax position.

    Adjusted EBITDA2 was driven by the same factors as Adjusted Earnings.

    Cash flow from operating activities for the second quarter 2025 was primarily driven by Adjusted EBITDA, dividends (net of profits) from joint ventures and associates of $1,542 million and working capital inflows of $655 million. These inflows were partly offset by tax payments of $1,948 million.

    Total production, compared with the first quarter 2025, decreased mainly due to the SPDC divestment and higher planned maintenance, partly offset by new oil production.

    Half Year Analysis1

    Income/(loss) for the period was driven by the same factors as Adjusted Earnings and includes identified items.

    Adjusted Earnings, compared with the first half 2024, reflected lower realised prices (decrease of $1,262 million) and the comparative unfavourable impact of gas storage effects (decrease of $499 million), partly offset by lower exploration well write-offs (decrease of $574 million), lower depreciation, depletion and amortisation expenses (decrease of $375 million), lower operating expenses (decrease of $245 million) and favourable tax movements ($143 million).

    Identified items in the first half 2025 included gains of $509 million from disposal of assets and a gain of $168 million related to the impact of the strengthening Brazilian real on a deferred tax position, offset by a charge of $509 million related to the UK Energy Profits Levy. These favourable movements and charges compare with the first half 2024 which included gains of $599 million related to the impact of inflationary adjustments in Argentina on a deferred tax position, partly offset by a loss of $191 million related to the impact of the weakening Brazilian real on a deferred tax position and impairment charges of $169 million.

    Adjusted EBITDA2 was driven by the same factors as Adjusted Earnings.

    Cash flow from operating activities for the first half 2025 was primarily driven by Adjusted EBITDA and dividends (net of profits) from joint ventures and associates of $1,384 million. These inflows were partly offset by tax payments of $3,946 million.

    Total production, compared with the first half 2024, decreased mainly due to the SPDC divestment and field decline largely offset by new oil production.

    1.All earnings amounts are shown post-tax, unless stated otherwise.

    2.Adjusted EBITDA is without taxation, exploration well write-offs and DD&A expenses.

             Page 5

    SHELL PLC
    2nd QUARTER 2025 AND HALF YEAR UNAUDITED RESULTS

                                                         
     
    MARKETING        
    Quarters $ million   Half year
    Q2 2025 Q1 2025 Q2 2024 %¹   Reference 2025 2024 %
                     
    766    814    202    -6 Income/(loss) for the period   1,580    1,099    +44
    (354)   (49)   (825)     Of which: Identified items A (402)   (832)    
                     
    1,199    900    1,082    +33 Adjusted Earnings A 2,100    1,863    +13
    2,181    1,869    1,999    +17 Adjusted EBITDA A 4,049    3,686    +10
    2,718    1,907    1,958    +43 Cash flow from operating activities A 4,625    3,277    +41
    429    256    644      Cash capital expenditure C 684    1,109     
    2,813    2,674    2,868    +5 Marketing sales volumes (thousand b/d)   2,744    2,816    -3

    1.Q2 on Q1 change

    The Marketing segment comprises the Mobility, Lubricants, and Sectors and Decarbonisation businesses. The Mobility business operates Shell’s retail network including electric vehicle charging services and the Wholesale commercial fuels business which provides fuels for transport and industry. The Lubricants business produces, markets and sells lubricants for road transport, and machinery used in manufacturing, mining, power generation, agriculture and construction. The Sectors and Decarbonisation business sells fuels, speciality products and services including low-carbon energy solutions to a broad range of commercial customers including the aviation, marine, and agricultural sectors.

    Quarter Analysis1

    Income/(loss) for the period was driven by the same factors as Adjusted Earnings and includes identified items.

    Adjusted Earnings, compared with the first quarter 2025, reflected higher Marketing margins (increase of $282 million) mainly due to higher Mobility unit margins and seasonal impact of higher volumes, stable Lubricants margins and Sectors and Decarbonisation margins, and favourable tax movements ($92 million). These net gains were partly offset by higher operating expenses (increase of $41 million).

    Identified items in the second quarter 2025 included net impairment charges and reversals of $285 million, net losses of $44 million related to the sale of assets, and charges of $44 million related to redundancy and restructuring. These charges and net losses compare with the first quarter 2025 which included net losses of $61 million related to the sale of assets.

    Adjusted EBITDA2 was driven by the same factors as Adjusted Earnings.

    Cash flow from operating activities for the second quarter 2025 was primarily driven by Adjusted EBITDA, inflows relating to the timing impact of payments related to emission certificates and biofuel programmes of $515 million, dividends (net of profits/losses) from joint ventures and associates of $161 million and working capital inflows of $67 million. These inflows were partly offset by tax payments of $132 million, and non-cash cost of supplies adjustment of $104 million.

    Marketing sales volumes (comprising hydrocarbon sales), compared with the first quarter 2025, increased mainly due to seasonality.

    Half Year Analysis1

    Income/(loss) for the period was driven by the same factors as Adjusted Earnings and includes identified items.

    Adjusted Earnings, compared with the first half 2024, reflected lower operating expenses (decrease of $199 million) and higher Marketing margins (increase of $71 million) including higher Mobility and Lubricants margins due to improved unit margins, partly offset by lower Sectors and Decarbonisation margins.

    Identified items in the first half 2025 included net impairment charges and reversals of $278 million and net losses of $105 million related to sale of assets. These charges and net losses compare with the first half 2024 which included impairment charges of $786 million mainly relating to an asset in the Netherlands, charges of $65 million related to redundancy and restructuring, and net losses of $56 million related to the sale of assets, partly offset by favourable movements of $50 million relating to the fair value accounting of commodity derivatives.

    Adjusted EBITDA2 was driven by the same factors as Adjusted Earnings.

    Cash flow from operating activities for the first half 2025 was primarily driven by Adjusted EBITDA, inflows relating to the timing impact of payments related to emission certificates and biofuel programmes of $1,055 million, dividends (net of

             Page 6

    SHELL PLC
    2nd QUARTER 2025 AND HALF YEAR UNAUDITED RESULTS

    profits/losses) from joint ventures and associates of $365 million. These inflows were partly offset by tax payments of $306 million, working capital outflows of $277 million and non-cash cost of supplies adjustment of $156 million.

    Marketing sales volumes (comprising hydrocarbon sales), compared with the first half 2024, decreased mainly in Mobility due to portfolio changes and in Sectors and Decarbonisation.

    1.All earnings amounts are shown post-tax, unless stated otherwise.

    2.Adjusted EBITDA is without taxation and DD&A expenses.

             Page 7

    SHELL PLC
    2nd QUARTER 2025 AND HALF YEAR UNAUDITED RESULTS

                                                         
     
    CHEMICALS AND PRODUCTS        
    Quarters $ million   Half year
    Q2 2025 Q1 2025 Q2 2024 %¹   Reference 2025 2024 %
                     
    (174)   (77)   545    -125 Income/(loss) for the period   (252)   1,856    -114
    (51)   (581)   (499)     Of which: Identified items A (631)   (956)    
                     
    118    449    1,085    -74 Adjusted Earnings A 567    2,700    -79
    864    1,410    2,242    -39 Adjusted EBITDA A 2,274    5,068    -55
    1,372    130    2,249    +956 Cash flow from operating activities A 1,502    1,900    -21
    775    458    638      Cash capital expenditure C 1,233    1,138     
    1,156    1,362    1,429    -15 Refinery processing intake (thousand b/d)   1,258    1,429    -12
    2,164    2,813    3,052    -23 Chemicals sales volumes (thousand tonnes)   4,977    5,934    -16

    1.Q2 on Q1 change

    The Chemicals and Products segment includes chemicals manufacturing plants with their own marketing network, and refineries which turn crude oil and other feedstocks into a range of oil products which are moved and marketed around the world for domestic, industrial and transport use. The segment also includes the pipeline business, trading and optimisation of crude oil, oil products and petrochemicals, and Oil Sands activities (the extraction of bitumen from mined oil sands and its conversion into synthetic crude oil).

    Quarter Analysis1

    Income/(loss) for the period was driven by the same factors as Adjusted Earnings and includes identified items.

    Adjusted Earnings, compared with the first quarter 2025, reflected lower Products margins (decrease of $450 million) mainly driven by lower margins from trading and optimisation, partly offset by higher refining margins. Adjusted Earnings also reflected lower Chemicals margins (decrease of $103 million). These net losses were partly offset by favourable tax movements ($96 million) and lower operating expenses (decrease of $58 million).

    In the second quarter 2025, Chemicals had negative Adjusted Earnings of $192 million and Products had positive Adjusted Earnings of $310 million.

    Identified items in the second quarter 2025 included impairment charges of $62 million. These charges compare with the first quarter 2025 which included impairment charges of $277 million and unfavourable movements of $202 million due to the fair value accounting of commodity derivatives that, as part of Shell’s normal business, are entered into as hedges for mitigation of economic exposures on future purchases, sales and inventory.

    Adjusted EBITDA2 was driven by the same factors as Adjusted Earnings.

    Cash flow from operating activities for the second quarter 2025 was primarily driven by Adjusted EBITDA, inflows relating to the timing impact of payments relating to emission certificates and biofuel programmes of $367 million and working capital inflows of $383 million. These inflows were partly offset by non-cash cost of supplies adjustment of $333 million.

    Refinery utilisation was 94% compared with 85% in the first quarter 2025, mainly due to lower planned and unplanned maintenance.

    Chemicals manufacturing plant utilisation was 72% compared with 81% in the first quarter 2025, mainly due to higher planned maintenance, and unplanned maintenance mainly in Monaca.

    Half Year Analysis1

    Income/(loss) for the period was driven by the same factors as Adjusted Earnings and includes identified items.

    Adjusted Earnings, compared with the first half 2024, reflected lower Products margins (decrease of $1,960 million), driven mainly by lower margins from trading and optimisation and lower refining margins. Adjusted Earnings also reflected lower Chemicals margins (decrease of $415 million). These net losses were partly offset by lower operating expenses (decrease of $180 million) and favourable tax movements ($70 million).

    Identified items in the first half 2025 included impairment charges of $339 million and unfavourable movements of $153 million due to the fair value accounting of commodity derivatives. These charges and unfavourable movements compare with the first half 2024 which included net impairment charges and reversals of $860 million mainly relating to assets in Singapore, and unfavourable movements of $163 million relating to the fair value accounting of commodity derivatives.

             Page 8

    SHELL PLC
    2nd QUARTER 2025 AND HALF YEAR UNAUDITED RESULTS

    Adjusted EBITDA2 was driven by the same factors as Adjusted Earnings.

    In the first half 2025, Chemicals had negative Adjusted Earnings of $329 million and Products had positive Adjusted Earnings of $896 million.

    Cash flow from operating activities for the first half 2025 was primarily driven by Adjusted EBITDA, inflows related to the timing impact of payments relating to emission certificates and biofuel programmes of $492 million, and dividends (net of profits) from joint ventures and associates of $124 million. These inflows were partly offset by working capital outflows of $698 million, net cash outflows relating to commodity derivatives of $504 million, and non-cash cost of supplies adjustment of $266 million.

    Refinery utilisation was 89% compared with 92% in the first half 2024, mainly due to higher planned and unplanned maintenance.

    Chemicals manufacturing plant utilisation was 77%, at the same level as in the first half 2024.

    1.All earnings amounts are shown post-tax, unless stated otherwise.

    2.Adjusted EBITDA is without taxation and DD&A expenses.

             Page 9

    SHELL PLC
    2nd QUARTER 2025 AND HALF YEAR UNAUDITED RESULTS

                                                         
     
    RENEWABLES AND ENERGY SOLUTIONS        
    Quarters $ million   Half year
    Q2 2025 Q1 2025 Q2 2024 %¹   Reference 2025 2024 %
                     
    (254)   (247)   (75)   -3 Income/(loss) for the period   (501)   478    -205
    (245)   (205)   112      Of which: Identified items A (450)   501     
    (9)   (42)   (187)   +78 Adjusted Earnings A (51)   (24)   -116
    102    111    (91)   -8 Adjusted EBITDA A 213    175    +21
    1    367    847    -100 Cash flow from operating activities A 368    3,313    -89
    555    403    425      Cash capital expenditure C 958    863     
    70    76    74    -9 External power sales (terawatt hours)2   146    151    -3
    132    184    148    -28 Sales of pipeline gas to end-use customers (terawatt hours)3   315    338    -7

    1.Q2 on Q1 change

    2.Physical power sales to third parties; excluding financial trades and physical trade with brokers, investors, financial institutions, trading platforms, and wholesale traders.

    3.Physical natural gas sales to third parties; excluding financial trades and physical trade with brokers, investors, financial institutions, trading platforms, and wholesale traders. Excluding sales of natural gas by other segments and LNG sales.

    Renewables and Energy Solutions includes activities such as renewable power generation, the marketing and trading and optimisation of power and pipeline gas, as well as carbon credits, and digitally enabled customer solutions. It also includes the production and marketing of hydrogen, development of commercial carbon capture and storage hubs, investment in nature-based projects that avoid or reduce carbon emissions, and Shell Ventures, which invests in companies that work to accelerate the energy and mobility transformation.

    Quarter Analysis1

    Income/(loss) for the period was driven by the same factors as Adjusted Earnings and includes identified items.

    Adjusted Earnings, compared with the first quarter 2025, reflected lower operating expenses (decrease of $54 million) and favourable tax movements ($33 million), partly offset by lower margins (decrease of $56 million).

    Most Renewables and Energy Solutions activities were loss-making in the second quarter 2025, which was partly offset by positive Adjusted Earnings from trading and optimisation.

    Identified items in the second quarter 2025 included unfavourable movements of $217 million due to the fair value accounting of commodity derivatives and impairment charges of $136 million, partly offset by gains of $108 million on sales of assets. These charges and favourable movements compare with the first quarter 2025 which included a loss of $143 million related to the disposal of assets. As part of Shell’s normal business, commodity derivative contracts are entered into as hedges for mitigation of economic exposures on future purchases, sales and inventory.

    Adjusted EBITDA2 was driven by the same factors as Adjusted Earnings.

    Cash flow from operating activities for the second quarter 2025 was primarily driven by Adjusted EBITDA. This inflow was offset by working capital outflows of $128 million.

    Half Year Analysis1

    Income/(loss) for the period was driven by the same factors as Adjusted Earnings and includes identified items.

    Adjusted Earnings, compared with the first half 2024, reflected lower margins (decrease of $140 million), mainly from trading and optimisation, partly offset by lower operating expenses (decrease of $115 million).

    Most Renewables and Energy Solutions activities were loss-making for the first half 2025, which was partly offset by positive Adjusted Earnings from trading and optimisation.

    Identified items in the first half 2025 included unfavourable movements of $196 million relating to the fair value accounting of commodity derivatives and impairment losses of $167 million. These net charges compare with the first half 2024 which included favourable movements of $529 million relating to the fair value accounting of commodity derivatives, partly offset by net impairment charges and reversals of $78 million. As part of Shell’s normal business, commodity derivative contracts are entered into for mitigation of economic exposures on future purchases, sales and inventory.

    Adjusted EBITDA2 was driven by the same factors as Adjusted Earnings.

             Page 10

    SHELL PLC
    2nd QUARTER 2025 AND HALF YEAR UNAUDITED RESULTS

    Cash flow from operating activities for the first half 2025 was primarily driven by working capital inflows of $252 million and Adjusted EBITDA. These inflows were partly offset by net cash outflows related to derivatives of $235 million.

    1.All earnings amounts are shown post-tax, unless stated otherwise.

    2.Adjusted EBITDA is without taxation and DD&A expenses.

    Additional Growth Measures

                                                         
    Quarters     Half year
    Q2 2025 Q1 2025 Q2 2024 %¹     2025 2024 %
            Renewable power generation capacity (gigawatt):        
    3.9    3.5    3.3    +10 – In operation2   3.9    3.3    +16
    3.8    4.0    3.8    -5 – Under construction and/or committed for sale3   3.8    3.8    -1

    1.Q2 on Q1 change

    2.Shell’s equity share of renewable generation capacity post commercial operation date. It excludes Shell’s equity share of associates where information cannot be obtained.

    3.Shell’s equity share of renewable generation capacity under construction and/or committed for sale under long-term offtake agreements (PPA). It excludes Shell’s equity share of associates where information cannot be obtained.

                                             
     
    CORPORATE      
    Quarters $ million   Half year
    Q2 2025 Q1 2025 Q2 2024   Reference 2025 2024
                 
    (539)   (483)   (1,656)   Income/(loss) for the period   (1,022)   (2,010)  
    (77)   (26)   (1,080)   Of which: Identified items A (102)   (1,066)  
    (463)   (457)   (576)   Adjusted Earnings A (920)   (944)  
    (346)   (261)   (213)   Adjusted EBITDA A (607)   (304)  
    (2,283)   (531)   (1,468)   Cash flow from operating activities A (2,814)   (2,013)  

    The Corporate segment covers the non-operating activities supporting Shell. It comprises Shell’s holdings and treasury organisation, headquarters and central functions, self-insurance activities and centrally managed longer-term innovation portfolio. All finance expense, income and related taxes are included in Corporate Adjusted Earnings rather than in the earnings of business segments.

    Quarter Analysis1

    Income/(loss) for the period was driven by the same factors as Adjusted Earnings and includes identified items.

    Adjusted Earnings, compared with the first quarter 2025, reflected unfavourable tax movements and unfavourable currency exchange rate effects, partly offset by favourable net interest movements.

    Adjusted EBITDA2 was mainly driven by unfavourable currency exchange rate effects.

    Cash flow from operating activities for the second quarter 2025 was primarily driven by working capital outflows of $1,715 million, which included a reduction in joint venture deposits, and Adjusted EBITDA.

    Half Year Analysis1

    Income/(loss) for the period was driven by the same factors as Adjusted Earnings and includes identified items.

    Adjusted Earnings, compared with the first half 2024, were primarily driven by favourable tax movements, partly offset by unfavourable currency exchange rate effects and unfavourable net interest movements.

    Identified items in the first half 2024 included reclassifications from equity to profit and loss of cumulative currency translation differences related to funding structures resulting in unfavourable movements of $1,122 million. These currency

    translation differences were previously recognised in other comprehensive income and accumulated in equity as part of

    accumulated other comprehensive income.

    Adjusted EBITDA2 was mainly driven by unfavourable currency exchange rate effects.

    Cash flow from operating activities for the first half 2025 was primarily driven by working capital outflows of $1,734 million, which included a reduction in joint venture deposits, and Adjusted EBITDA.

    1.All earnings amounts are shown post-tax, unless stated otherwise.

    2.Adjusted EBITDA is without taxation and DD&A expenses.

             Page 11

    SHELL PLC
    2nd QUARTER 2025 AND HALF YEAR UNAUDITED RESULTS

    OUTLOOK FOR THE THIRD QUARTER 2025

    Full year 2024 cash capital expenditure was $21 billion. Our cash capital expenditure range for the full year 2025 is expected to be within $20 – $22 billion.

    Integrated Gas production is expected to be approximately 910 – 970 thousand boe/d. LNG liquefaction volumes are expected to be approximately 6.7 – 7.3 million tonnes.

    Upstream production is expected to be approximately 1,700 – 1,900 thousand boe/d.

    Marketing sales volumes are expected to be approximately 2,600 – 3,100 thousand b/d.

    Refinery utilisation is expected to be approximately 88% – 96%. Chemicals manufacturing plant utilisation is expected to be approximately 78% – 86%.

    Corporate Adjusted Earnings1 were a net expense of $463 million for the second quarter 2025. Corporate Adjusted Earnings are expected to be a net expense of approximately $500 – $700 million in the third quarter 2025.

    1.For the definition of Adjusted Earnings and the most comparable GAAP measure see Reference A.

    FORTHCOMING EVENTS

               
     
    Date Event
    October 30, 2025 Third quarter 2025 results and dividends

             Page 12

    SHELL PLC
    2nd QUARTER 2025 AND HALF YEAR UNAUDITED RESULTS

    UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

                                       
     
    CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME    
    Quarters $ million Half year
    Q2 2025 Q1 2025 Q2 2024   2025 2024
    65,406    69,234    74,463    Revenue1 134,640    146,942   
    712    615    898    Share of profit/(loss) of joint ventures and associates 1,327    2,216   
    326    302    (305)   Interest and other income/(expenses)2 628    602   
    66,443    70,152    75,057    Total revenue and other income/(expenses) 136,596    149,760   
    44,099    45,849    49,417    Purchases 89,948    96,284   
    4,909    5,549    5,593    Production and manufacturing expenses 10,459    11,403   
    3,077    2,840    3,094    Selling, distribution and administrative expenses 5,917    6,069   
    278    185    263    Research and development 464    475   
    360    210    496    Exploration 569    1,246   
    6,670    5,441    7,555    Depreciation, depletion and amortisation2 12,111    13,436   
    1,075    1,120    1,235    Interest expense 2,194    2,399   
    60,468    61,194    67,653    Total expenditure 121,662    131,312   
    5,975    8,959    7,404    Income/(loss) before taxation 14,934    18,447   
    2,332    4,083    3,754    Taxation charge/(credit)2 6,415    7,358   
    3,644    4,875    3,650    Income/(loss) for the period 8,519    11,089   
    43    95    133    Income/(loss) attributable to non-controlling interest 138    215   
    3,601    4,780    3,517    Income/(loss) attributable to Shell plc shareholders 8,381    10,874   
    0.61    0.79    0.55    Basic earnings per share ($)3 1.40    1.70   
    0.60    0.79    0.55    Diluted earnings per share ($)3 1.39    1.68   

    1.See Note 2 “Segment information”.

    2.See Note 7 “Other notes to the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements”.

    3.See Note 3 “Earnings per share”.

                                       
     
    CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME    
    Quarters $ million Half year
    Q2 2025 Q1 2025 Q2 2024   2025 2024
    3,644    4,875    3,650    Income/(loss) for the period 8,519    11,089   
          Other comprehensive income/(loss) net of tax:    
          Items that may be reclassified to income in later periods:    
    4,127    1,711    698    – Currency translation differences1 5,837    (1,296)  
    7    6    (12)   – Debt instruments remeasurements 14    (19)  
    (109)   (25)   14    – Cash flow hedging gains/(losses) (135)   67   
    5    (42)   (6)   – Deferred cost of hedging (37)   (20)  
    113    74    (50)   – Share of other comprehensive income/(loss) of joint ventures and associates 187    (62)  
    4,143    1,723    644    Total 5,866    (1,330)  
          Items that are not reclassified to income in later periods:    
    158    306    310    – Retirement benefits remeasurements 465    749   
    (8)   (16)   (81)   – Equity instruments remeasurements (24)   (3)  
    (23)   (36)   44    – Share of other comprehensive income/(loss) of joint ventures and associates (59)   55   
    128    254    273    Total 381    801   
    4,270    1,977    917    Other comprehensive income/(loss) for the period 6,248    (529)  
    7,914    6,852    4,567    Comprehensive income/(loss) for the period 14,767    10,560   
    122    105    123    Comprehensive income/(loss) attributable to non-controlling interest 227    180   
    7,792    6,748    4,443    Comprehensive income/(loss) attributable to Shell plc shareholders 14,540    10,381   

    1.See Note 7 “Other notes to the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements”.

             Page 13

    SHELL PLC
    2nd QUARTER 2025 AND HALF YEAR UNAUDITED RESULTS

                     
     
    CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
    $ million    
      June 30, 2025 December 31, 2024
    Assets    
    Non-current assets    
    Goodwill 16,332    16,032   
    Other intangible assets 11,338    9,480   
    Property, plant and equipment 186,461    185,219   
    Joint ventures and associates 23,456    23,445   
    Investments in securities 2,225    2,255   
    Deferred tax 7,524    6,857   
    Retirement benefits 10,980    10,003   
    Trade and other receivables 7,315    6,018   
    Derivative financial instruments1 692    374   
      266,323    259,683   
    Current assets    
    Inventories 23,283    23,426   
    Trade and other receivables 45,570    45,860   
    Derivative financial instruments1 9,443    9,673   
    Cash and cash equivalents 32,682    39,110   
      110,978    118,069   
    Assets classified as held for sale2 10,619    9,857   
      121,597    127,926   
    Total assets 387,920    387,609   
    Liabilities    
    Non-current liabilities    
    Debt 65,218    65,448   
    Trade and other payables 5,876    3,290   
    Derivative financial instruments1 1,037    2,185   
    Deferred tax 12,921    13,505   
    Retirement benefits 6,983    6,752   
    Decommissioning and other provisions 20,777    21,227   
      112,813    112,407   
    Current liabilities    
    Debt 10,457    11,630   
    Trade and other payables 58,379    60,693   
    Derivative financial instruments1 6,451    7,391   
    Income taxes payable 3,642    4,648   
    Decommissioning and other provisions 5,234    4,469   
      84,164    88,831   
    Liabilities directly associated with assets classified as held for sale2 7,856    6,203   
      92,020    95,034   
    Total liabilities 204,832    207,441   
    Equity attributable to Shell plc shareholders 181,137    178,307   
    Non-controlling interest 1,951    1,861   
    Total equity 183,088    180,168   
    Total liabilities and equity 387,920    387,609   

    1.    See Note 6 “Derivative financial instruments and debt excluding lease liabilities”.

    2. .See Note 7 “Other notes to the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements”.

             Page 14

    SHELL PLC
    2nd QUARTER 2025 AND HALF YEAR UNAUDITED RESULTS

                                                         
     
    CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
      Equity attributable to Shell plc shareholders      
    $ million Share capital1 Shares held in trust Other reserves² Retained earnings Total Non-controlling interest   Total equity
    At January 1, 2025 510    (803)   19,766    158,834    178,307    1,861      180,168   
    Comprehensive income/(loss) for the period —    —    6,159    8,381    14,540    227      14,767   
    Transfer from other comprehensive income —    —    18    (18)   —    —      —   
    Dividends³ —    —    —    (4,302)   (4,302)   (113)     (4,415)  
    Repurchases of shares4 (17)   —    17    (7,038)   (7,038)   —      (7,038)  
    Share-based compensation —    516    (486)   (426)   (396)   —      (396)  
    Other changes —    —    —    29    29    (24)     5   
    At June 30, 2025 493    (288)   25,473    155,458    181,137    1,951      183,088   
    At January 1, 2024 544    (997)   21,145    165,915    186,607    1,755      188,362   
    Comprehensive income/(loss) for the period —    —    (494)   10,874    10,381    180      10,560   
    Transfer from other comprehensive income —    —    170    (170)   —    —      —   
    Dividends3 —    —    —    (4,387)   (4,387)   (150)     (4,537)  
    Repurchases of shares4 (17)   —    17    (7,020)   (7,020)   —      (7,020)  
    Share-based compensation —    544    (213)   (406)   (76)   —      (76)  
    Other changes —    —    —    (96)   (96)   (1)     (98)  
    At June 30, 2024 528    (454)   20,625    164,709    185,407    1,783      187,190   

    1.    See Note 4 “Share capital”.

    2.    See Note 5 “Other reserves”.

    3.    The amount charged to retained earnings is based on prevailing exchange rates on payment date.

    4.     Includes shares committed to repurchase under an irrevocable contract and repurchases subject to settlement at the end of the quarter.

             Page 15

    SHELL PLC
    2nd QUARTER 2025 AND HALF YEAR UNAUDITED RESULTS

                                             
     
    CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS    
    Quarters $ million Half year
    Q2 2025   Q1 2025 Q2 2024   2025 2024
    5,975      8,959    7,404    Income before taxation for the period 14,934    18,447   
            Adjustment for:    
    515      636    619    – Interest expense (net) 1,151    1,195   
    6,670      5,441    7,555    – Depreciation, depletion and amortisation1 12,111    13,436   
    206      28    269    – Exploration well write-offs 234    823   
    (128)     127    (143)   – Net (gains)/losses on sale and revaluation of non-current assets and businesses (1)   (154)  
    (712)     (615)   (898)   – Share of (profit)/loss of joint ventures and associates (1,327)   (2,216)  
    2,361      523    792    – Dividends received from joint ventures and associates1 2,884    1,530   
    (27)     854    (954)   – (Increase)/decrease in inventories 827    (1,562)  
    3,635      (2,610)   1,965    – (Increase)/decrease in current receivables 1,025    1,770   
    (3,994)     (907)   (1,269)   – Increase/(decrease) in current payables (4,901)   (3,218)  
    626      (244)   253    – Derivative financial instruments 381    1,638   
    (17)     (100)   (332)   – Retirement benefits (118)   (392)  
    (425)     (480)   (332)   – Decommissioning and other provisions (906)   (931)  
    684      570    2,027    – Other1 1,254    2,536   
    (3,432)     (2,900)   (3,448)   Tax paid (6,331)   (6,064)  
    11,937      9,281    13,508    Cash flow from operating activities 21,218    26,838   
    (5,393)     (3,748)   (4,445)      Capital expenditure (9,141)   (8,424)  
    (406)     (413)   (261)      Investments in joint ventures and associates (819)   (761)  
    (17)     (15)   (13)      Investments in equity securities (32)   (25)  
    (5,817)     (4,175)   (4,719)   Cash capital expenditure (9,993)   (9,211)  
    (57)     559    710    Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment and businesses1 502    1,033   
    1      33    57    Proceeds from joint ventures and associates from sale, capital reduction and repayment of long-term loans 34    190   
    19      5    2    Proceeds from sale of equity securities 24    570   
    508      508    648    Interest received 1,016    1,224   
    360      506    883    Other investing cash inflows 866    1,740   
    (420)     (1,394)   (920)   Other investing cash outflows (1,814)   (2,414)  
    (5,406)     (3,959)   (3,338)   Cash flow from investing activities (9,365)   (6,866)  
    (208)     80    (179)   Net increase/(decrease) in debt with maturity period within three months (127)   (286)  
            Other debt:    
    180      139    132    – New borrowings 319    299   
    (4,075)     (2,514)   (4,154)   – Repayments (6,589)   (5,686)  
    (1,212)     (846)   (1,287)   Interest paid (2,059)   (2,198)  
    896      326    (115)   Derivative financial instruments 1,222    (412)  
    —      (25)   (1)   Change in non-controlling interest (25)   (5)  
            Cash dividends paid to:    
    (2,122)     (2,179)   (2,177)   – Shell plc shareholders (4,300)   (4,387)  
    (27)     (86)   (82)   – Non-controlling interest (113)   (150)  
    (3,533)     (3,311)   (3,958)   Repurchases of shares (6,844)   (6,782)  
    (5)     (768)   (24)   Shares held in trust: net sales/(purchases) and dividends received (773)   (486)  
    (10,106)     (9,183)   (11,846)   Cash flow from financing activities (19,289)   (20,094)  
    655      353    (126)   Effects of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents 1,008    (505)  
    (2,919)     (3,509)   (1,801)   Increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents (6,428)   (627)  
    35,601      39,110    39,949    Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 39,110    38,774   
    32,682      35,601    38,148    Cash and cash equivalents at end of period 32,682    38,148   

    1.See Note 7 “Other notes to the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements”.

             Page 16

    SHELL PLC
    2nd QUARTER 2025 AND HALF YEAR UNAUDITED RESULTS

    NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

    1. Basis of preparation

    These unaudited Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements of Shell plc (“the Company”) and its subsidiaries (collectively referred to as “Shell”) have been prepared in accordance with IAS 34 Interim Financial Reporting as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”) and adopted by the UK, and on the basis of the same accounting principles as those used in the Company’s Annual Report and Accounts (pages 240 to 312) for the year ended December 31, 2024, as filed with the Registrar of Companies for England and Wales and as filed with the Autoriteit Financiële Markten (the Netherlands) and Amendment No. 1 to Form 20-F (“Form 20-F/A”) (pages 10 to 83) for the year ended December 31, 2024, as filed with the US Securities and Exchange Commission, and should be read in conjunction with these filings.

    The financial information presented in the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements does not constitute statutory accounts within the meaning of section 434(3) of the Companies Act 2006 (“the Act”). Statutory accounts for the year ended December 31, 2024, were published in Shell’s Annual Report and Accounts, a copy of which was delivered to the Registrar of Companies for England and Wales. The auditor’s report on those accounts was unqualified, did not include a reference to any matters to which the auditor drew attention by way of emphasis without qualifying the report and did not contain a statement under sections 498(2) or 498(3) of the Act.

    Going Concern

    These unaudited Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements have been prepared on the going concern basis of accounting. In assessing the appropriateness of the going concern assumption over the period to December 31, 2026 (the ‘going concern period’), management have stress-tested Shell’s most recent financial projections to incorporate a range of potential future outcomes by considering Shell’s principal risks, potential downside pressures on commodity prices and long-term demand, and cash preservation measures, including reduced cash capital expenditure and shareholder distributions. This assessment confirmed that Shell has adequate cash, other liquid resources and undrawn credit facilities to enable it to meet its obligations as they fall due in order to continue its operations during the going concern period. Therefore, the Directors consider it appropriate to continue to adopt the going concern basis of accounting in preparing these unaudited Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements.

    Key accounting considerations, significant judgements and estimates

    Future commodity price assumptions, which represent a significant estimate, were subject to change in the second quarter 2025 (See Note 7). Noting continued volatility in markets, price assumptions remain under review.

    The discount rates applied for impairment testing and the discount rate applied to provisions are reviewed on a regular basis. Both discount rates applied in the first half year 2025 remain unchanged compared with 2024.

    2. Segment information

    With effect from January 1, 2025, segment earnings are presented on an Adjusted Earnings basis (Adjusted Earnings), which is the earnings measure used by the Chief Executive Officer, who serves as the Chief Operating Decision Maker, for the purposes of making decisions about allocating resources and assessing performance. This aligns with Shell’s focus on performance, discipline and simplification.

    The Adjusted Earnings measure is presented on a current cost of supplies (CCS) basis and aims to facilitate a comparative understanding of Shell’s financial performance from period to period by removing the effects of oil price changes on inventory carrying amounts and removing the effects of identified items. Identified items are in some cases driven by external factors and may, either individually or collectively, hinder the comparative understanding of Shell’s financial results from period to period.

    The segment earnings measure used until December 31, 2024 was CCS earnings. The difference between CCS earnings and Adjusted Earnings are the identified items. Comparative periods are presented below on an Adjusted Earnings basis.

             Page 17

    SHELL PLC
    2nd QUARTER 2025 AND HALF YEAR UNAUDITED RESULTS

    ADJUSTED EARNINGS BY SEGMENT

                                                   
     
    Q2 2025 $ million
      Integrated Gas Upstream Marketing Chemicals and Products Renewables and Energy Solutions Corporate Total
    Income/(loss) attributable to Shell plc shareholders             3,601
    Income/(loss) attributable to non-controlling interest             43
    Income/(loss) for the period 1,838    2,008    766    (174)   (254)   (539)   3,644   
    Add: Current cost of supplies adjustment before taxation     104    333        436
    Add: Tax on current cost of supplies adjustment     (24)   (91)       (115)
    Less: Identified items before taxation (102)   271    (460)   (64)   (300)   (63)   (717)
    Add: Tax on identified items (203)   (5)   (106)   (13)   (55)   14    (369)
    Adjusted Earnings 1,737    1,732    1,199    118    (9)   (463)   4,314   
    Adjusted Earnings attributable to Shell plc shareholders             4,264
    Adjusted Earnings attributable to non-controlling interest             50
                                                   
     
    Q1 2025 $ million
      Integrated Gas Upstream Marketing Chemicals and Products Renewables and Energy Solutions Corporate Total
    Income/(loss) attributable to Shell plc shareholders             4,780
    Income/(loss) attributable to non-controlling interest             95
    Income/(loss) for the period 2,789    2,080    814    (77)   (247)   (483)   4,875
    Add: Current cost of supplies adjustment before taxation     52    (67)       (15)
    Add: Tax on current cost of supplies adjustment     (14)   12        (2)
    Less: Identified items before taxation 348    121    (44)   (679)   (260)   4    (510)
    Add: Tax on identified items 43    378    4    (99)   (54)   29    301
    Adjusted Earnings 2,483    2,337    900    449    (42)   (457)   5,670
    Adjusted Earnings attributable to Shell plc shareholders             5,577
    Adjusted Earnings attributable to non-controlling interest             94
                                                   
     
    Q2 2024 $ million
      Integrated Gas Upstream Marketing Chemicals and Products Renewables and Energy Solutions Corporate Total
    Income/(loss) attributable to Shell plc shareholders             3,517
    Income/(loss) attributable to non-controlling interest             133
    Income/(loss) for the period 2,454    2,179    202    545    (75)   (1,656)   3,650
    Add: Current cost of supplies adjustment before taxation     74    59        133
    Add: Tax on current cost of supplies adjustment     (19)   (17)       (36)
    Less: Identified items before taxation (260)   (215)   (1,111)   (333)   198    (1,105)   (2,826)
    Add: Tax on identified items (40)   (58)   (286)   165    87    (25)   (157)
    Adjusted Earnings 2,675    2,336    1,082    1,085    (187)   (576)   6,415
    Adjusted Earnings attributable to Shell plc shareholders             6,293
    Adjusted Earnings attributable to non-controlling interest             122

             Page 18

    SHELL PLC
    2nd QUARTER 2025 AND HALF YEAR UNAUDITED RESULTS

                                                   
     
    Half year 2025 $ million
      Integrated Gas Upstream Marketing Chemicals and Products Renewables and Energy Solutions Corporate Total
    Income/(loss) attributable to Shell plc shareholders             8,381
    Income/(loss) attributable to non-controlling interest             138
    Income/(loss) for the period 4,627    4,088    1,580    (252)   (501)   (1,022)   8,519
    Add: Current cost of supplies adjustment before taxation     156    266        422
    Add: Tax on current cost of supplies adjustment     (38)   (79)       (116)
    Less: Identified items before taxation 246    392    (504)   (743)   (559)   (59)   (1,227)
    Add: Tax on identified items (160)   373    (102)   (111)   (110)   43    (68)
    Adjusted Earnings 4,220    4,068    2,100    567    (51)   (920)   9,984
    Adjusted Earnings attributable to Shell plc shareholders             9,841
    Adjusted Earnings attributable to non-controlling interest             144
                                                   
     
    Half year 2024 $ million
      Integrated Gas Upstream Marketing Chemicals and Products Renewables and Energy Solutions Corporate Total
    Income/(loss) attributable to Shell plc shareholders             10,874
    Income/(loss) attributable to non-controlling interest             215
    Income/(loss) for the period 5,215    4,451    1,099    1,856    478    (2,010)   11,089
    Add: Current cost of supplies adjustment before taxation     (79)   (148)       (227)
    Add: Tax on current cost of supplies adjustment     11    37        48
    Less: Identified items before taxation (1,336)   (261)   (1,123)   (908)   668    (1,111)   (4,070)
    Add: Tax on identified items (197)   (443)   (290)   48    167    (45)   (761)
    Adjusted Earnings 6,354    4,270    1,863    2,700    (24)   (944)   14,219
    Adjusted Earnings attributable to Shell plc shareholders             14,027
    Adjusted Earnings attributable to non-controlling interest             192

    CASH CAPITAL EXPENDITURE BY SEGMENT

    Cash capital expenditure is a measure used by the Chief Executive Officer for the purposes of making decisions about allocating resources and assessing performance.

                                                   
     
    Q2 2025 $ million
      Integrated Gas Upstream Marketing Chemicals and Products Renewables and Energy Solutions Corporate Total
    Capital expenditure 988    2,774    427    704    468    32    5,393
    Add: Investments in joint ventures and associates 209    52    1    71    72    1    406
    Add: Investment in equity securities —    —    —    —    16    2    17
    Cash capital expenditure 1,196    2,826    429    775    555    36    5,817
                                                   
     
    Q1 2025 $ million
      Integrated Gas Upstream Marketing Chemicals and Products Renewables and Energy Solutions Corporate Total
    Capital expenditure 943    1,727    252    451    358    17    3,748
    Add: Investments in joint ventures and associates 174    197    4    7    30    1    413
    Add: Investments in equity securities —    —    —    —    14    —    15
    Cash capital expenditure 1,116    1,923    256    458    403    19    4,175

             Page 19

    SHELL PLC
    2nd QUARTER 2025 AND HALF YEAR UNAUDITED RESULTS

                                                   
     
    Q2 2024 $ million
      Integrated Gas Upstream Marketing Chemicals and Products Renewables and Energy Solutions Corporate Total
    Capital expenditure 1,024    1,769    644    601    377    30    4,445
    Add: Investments in joint ventures and associates 127    60    —    37    35    1    261
    Add: Investments in equity securities —    —    —    —    13    —    13
    Cash Capital expenditure 1,151    1,829    644    638    425    32    4,719
                                                   
     
    Half year 2025 $ million
      Integrated Gas Upstream Marketing Chemicals and Products Renewables and Energy Solutions Corporate Total
    Capital expenditure 1,930    4,501    679    1,155    826    49    9,141
    Add: Investments in joint ventures and associates 383    248    5    78    102    3    819
    Add: Investment in equity securities —    —    —    —    30    2    32
    Cash capital expenditure 2,313    4,749    684    1,233    958    54    9,993
                                                   
     
    Half year 2024 $ million
      Integrated Gas Upstream Marketing Chemicals and Products Renewables and Energy Solutions Corporate Total
    Capital expenditure 1,882    3,535    1,071    1,074    797    64    8,424
    Add: Investments in joint ventures and associates 310    304    38    63    43    2    761
    Add: Investments in equity securities —    —    —    —    22    3    25
    Cash capital expenditure 2,192    3,839    1,109    1,138    863    69    9,211

    REVENUE BY SEGMENT

    Third-party revenue includes revenue from sources other than from contracts with customers, which mainly comprises the impact of fair value accounting of commodity derivatives.

                                                   
     
    Q2 2025 $ million
      Integrated Gas Upstream Marketing Chemicals and Products Renewables and Energy Solutions Corporate Total
    Revenue:              
         Third-party 9,576    1,193    28,241    18,388    7,996    12    65,406
         Inter-segment 2,412    8,502    2,177    8,775    835    —    22,701
                                                   
     
    Q1 2025 $ million
      Integrated Gas Upstream Marketing Chemicals and Products Renewables and Energy Solutions Corporate Total
    Revenue:              
         Third-party 9,602    1,510    27,083    21,610    9,417    12    69,234
         Inter-segment 2,675    9,854    1,849    8,255    1,164    —    23,797

             Page 20

    SHELL PLC
    2nd QUARTER 2025 AND HALF YEAR UNAUDITED RESULTS

                                                   
     
    Q2 2024 $ million
      Integrated Gas Upstream Marketing Chemicals and Products Renewables and Energy Solutions Corporate Total
    Revenue:              
         Third-party 9,052    1,590    32,005    24,583    7,222    11    74,463
         Inter-segment 2,157    10,102    1,363    9,849    957    —    24,428
                                                   
     
    Half year 2025 $ million
      Integrated Gas Upstream Marketing Chemicals and Products Renewables and Energy Solutions Corporate Total
    Revenue:              
         Third-party 19,179    2,703    55,324    39,998    17,413    23    134,640
         Inter-segment 5,086    18,356    4,026    17,030    1,999    —    46,498
                                                   
     
    Half year 2024 $ million
      Integrated Gas Upstream Marketing Chemicals and Products Renewables and Energy Solutions Corporate Total
    Revenue:              
         Third-party 18,247    3,349    62,045    48,319    14,959    22    146,942
         Inter-segment 4,560    20,390    2,718    20,161    1,962    —    49,791

    Identified items

    The objective of identified items is to remove material impacts on net income/loss arising from transactions which are generally uncontrollable and unusual (infrequent or non-recurring) in nature or giving rise to a mismatch between accounting and economic results, or certain transactions that are generally excluded from underlying results in the industry.

    Identified items comprise: divestment gains and losses, impairments and impairment reversals, redundancy and restructuring, fair value accounting of commodity derivatives and certain gas contracts that gives rise to a mismatch between accounting and economic results, the impact of exchange rate movements and inflationary adjustments on certain deferred tax balances, and other items.

             Page 21

    SHELL PLC
    2nd QUARTER 2025 AND HALF YEAR UNAUDITED RESULTS

                                                   
     
    Q2 2025 $ million
      Integrated Gas Upstream Marketing Chemicals and Products Renewables and Energy Solutions Corporate Total
    Identified items included in Income/(loss) before taxation              
    Divestment gains/(losses) 63 344 (56) (9) 119 (4) 457
    Impairment reversals/(impairments) (672) (3) (370) (78) (138) — (1,261)
    Redundancy and restructuring (7) (6) (57) (37) (1) (12) (119)
    Fair value accounting of commodity derivatives and certain gas contracts1 514 1 23 61 (280) — 319
    Other2 — (65) — (1) — (47) (113)
    Total identified items included in Income/(loss) before taxation (102) 271 (460) (64) (300) (63) (717)
    Less: Total identified items included in Taxation charge/(credit) (203) (5) (106) (13) (55) 14 (369)
    Identified items included in Income/(loss) for the period              
    Divestment gains/(losses) 54 350 (44) (7) 108 (3) 458
    Impairment reversals/(impairments) (423) (2) (285) (62) (136) — (908)
    Redundancy and restructuring (4) (2) (44) (29) — (8) (88)
    Fair value accounting of commodity derivatives and certain gas contracts1 454 — 19 49 (217) — 307
    Impact of exchange rate movements and inflationary adjustments on tax balances3 20 22 — — — (19) 23
    Other2 — (92) — (1) — (47) (139)
    Impact on Adjusted Earnings 101 276 (354) (51) (245) (77) (348)
    Impact on Adjusted Earnings attributable to non-controlling interest — — — — — — —
    Impact on Adjusted Earnings attributable to Shell plc shareholders 101 276 (354) (51) (245) (77) (348)

    1.Fair value accounting of commodity derivatives and certain gas contracts: In the ordinary course of business, Shell enters into contracts to supply or purchase oil and gas products, as well as power and environmental products. Shell also enters into contracts for tolling, pipeline and storage capacity. Derivative contracts are entered into for mitigation of resulting economic exposures (generally price exposure) and these derivative contracts are carried at period-end market price (fair value), with movements in fair value recognised in income for the period. Supply and purchase contracts entered into for operational purposes, as well as contracts for tolling, pipeline and storage capacity, are, by contrast, recognised when the transaction occurs; furthermore, inventory is carried at historical cost or net realisable value, whichever is lower. As a consequence, accounting mismatches occur because: (a) the supply or purchase transaction is recognised in a different period; or (b) the inventory is measured on a different basis. In addition, certain contracts are, due to pricing or delivery conditions, deemed to contain embedded derivatives or written options and are also required to be carried at fair value even though they are entered into for operational purposes. The accounting impacts are reported as identified items.

    2.Other identified items represent other credits or charges that based on Shell management’s assessment hinder the comparative understanding of Shell’s financial results from period to period.

    3.Impact of exchange rate movements and inflationary adjustments on tax balances represents the impact on tax balances of exchange rate movements and inflationary adjustments arising on: (a) the conversion to dollars of the local currency tax base of non-monetary assets and liabilities, as well as recognised tax losses (this primarily impacts the Integrated Gas and Upstream segments); and (b) the conversion of dollar-denominated inter-segment loans to local currency, leading to taxable exchange rate gains or losses (this primarily impacts the Corporate segment).

             Page 22

    SHELL PLC
    2nd QUARTER 2025 AND HALF YEAR UNAUDITED RESULTS

                                                   
     
    Q1 2025 $ million
      Integrated Gas Upstream Marketing Chemicals and Products Renewables and Energy Solutions Corporate Total
    Identified items included in Income/(loss) before taxation              
    Divestment gains/(losses) (1) 154 (57) (15) (187) — (106)
    Impairment reversals/(impairments) — (21) 10 (293) (38) — (341)
    Redundancy and restructuring (1) (15) (9) (13) (9) 4 (44)
    Fair value accounting of commodity derivatives and certain gas contracts1 420 (1) 12 (258) 20 — 194
    Other1 (70) 4 — (101) (46) — (212)
    Total identified items included in Income/(loss) before taxation 348 121 (44) (679) (260) 4 (510)
    Less: Total identified items included in Taxation charge/(credit) 43 378 4 (99) (54) 29 301
    Identified items included in Income/(loss) for the period              
    Divestment gains/(losses) — 8 (61) (12) (143) — (208)
    Impairment reversals/(impairments) — (15) 6 (277) (31) — (317)
    Redundancy and restructuring (1) (5) (1) (12) (7) 2 (24)
    Fair value accounting of commodity derivatives and certain gas contracts1 362 — 7 (202) 20 — 187
    Impact of exchange rate movements and inflationary adjustments on tax balances1 4 132 — — — (28) 108
    Other1 (59) (377) — (77) (45) — (558)
    Impact on Adjusted Earnings 306 (257) (49) (581) (205) (26) (811)
    Impact on Adjusted Earnings attributable to non-controlling interest — — — — — — —
    Impact on Adjusted Earnings attributable to Shell plc shareholders 306 (257) (49) (581) (205) (26) (811)

    1.For a detailed description, see the corresponding footnotes to the Q2 2025 identified items table above.

                                                   
     
    Q2 2024 $ million
      Integrated Gas Upstream Marketing Chemicals and Products Renewables and Energy Solutions Corporate Total
    Identified items included in Income/(loss) before taxation              
    Divestment gains/(losses) 2 131 (60) (8) 79 — 143
    Impairment reversals/(impairments) (18) (80) (1,055) (619) (161) — (1,932)
    Redundancy and restructuring (9) (56) (69) (30) (45) (2) (211)
    Fair value accounting of commodity derivatives and certain gas contracts1 (102) (29) 63 211 318 — 461
    Other1,2 (133) (181) 10 113 7 (1,103) (1,287)
    Total identified items included in Income/(loss) before taxation (260) (215) (1,111) (333) 198 (1,105) (2,826)
    Less: Total identified items included in Taxation charge/(credit) (40) (58) (286) 165 87 (25) (157)
    Identified items included in Income/(loss) for the period              
    Divestment gains/(losses) 1 114 (45) (6) 71 — 135
    Impairment reversals/(impairments) (15) (67) (783) (708) (155) — (1,728)
    Redundancy and restructuring (6) (33) (50) (23) (33) (1) (147)
    Fair value accounting of commodity derivatives and certain gas contracts1 (98) (7) 45 156 223 — 319
    Impact of exchange rate movements and inflationary adjustments on tax balances1 10 (4) — — — 43 49
    Other1,2 (113) (160) 7 83 5 (1,122) (1,298)
    Impact on Adjusted Earnings (220) (157) (825) (499) 112 (1,080) (2,669)
    Impact on Adjusted Earnings attributable to non-controlling interest — — — 18 — — 18
    Impact on Adjusted Earnings attributable to Shell plc shareholders (220) (157) (825) (517) 112 (1,080) (2,687)

    1.For a detailed description, see the corresponding footnotes to the Q2 2025 identified items table above.

             Page 23

    SHELL PLC
    2nd QUARTER 2025 AND HALF YEAR UNAUDITED RESULTS

    2.Corporate includes reclassifications from equity to profit and loss of cumulative currency translation differences related to funding structures resulting in unfavourable movements of $1,122 million. These currency translation differences were previously recognised in other comprehensive income and accumulated in equity as part of accumulated other comprehensive income.

                                                   
     
    Half year 2025 $ million
      Integrated Gas Upstream Marketing Chemicals and Products Renewables and Energy Solutions Corporate Total
    Identified items included in Income/(loss) before taxation              
    Divestment gains/(losses) 62 498 (113) (24) (68) (4) 351
    Impairment reversals/(impairments) (672) (24) (360) (371) (176) — (1,602)
    Redundancy and restructuring (8) (21) (66) (50) (10) (9) (164)
    Fair value accounting of commodity derivatives and certain gas contracts1 934 — 35 (196) (260) — 512
    Other1 (70) (61) — (102) (46) (47) (325)
    Total identified items included in Income/(loss) before taxation 246 392 (504) (743) (559) (59) (1,227)
    Less: Total identified items included in Taxation charge/(credit) (160) 373 (102) (111) (110) 43 (68)
    Identified items included in Income/(loss) for the period              
    Divestment gains/(losses) 53 358 (105) (19) (35) (3) 250
    Impairment reversals/(impairments) (423) (17) (278) (339) (167) — (1,225)
    Redundancy and restructuring (5) (7) (45) (42) (7) (6) (112)
    Fair value accounting of commodity derivatives and certain gas contracts1 817 — 26 (153) (196) — 494
    Impact of exchange rate movements and inflationary adjustments on tax balances1 24 154 — — — (47) 131
    Other1 (59) (469) — (78) (45) (47) (697)
    Impact on Adjusted Earnings 407 19 (402) (631) (450) (102) (1,160)
    Impact on Adjusted Earnings attributable to non-controlling interest — — — — — — —
    Impact on Adjusted Earnings attributable to Shell plc shareholders 407 19 (402) (631) (450) (102) (1,160)

    1.For a detailed description, see the corresponding footnotes to the Q2 2025 identified items table above.

             Page 24

    SHELL PLC
    2nd QUARTER 2025 AND HALF YEAR UNAUDITED RESULTS

                                                   
     
    Half year 2024 $ million
      Integrated Gas Upstream Marketing Chemicals and Products Renewables and Energy Solutions Corporate Total
    Identified items included in Income/(loss) before taxation              
    Divestment gains/(losses) (1) 158 (75) (17) 89 — 154
    Impairment reversals/(impairments) (26) (176) (1,059) (797) (102) — (2,159)
    Redundancy and restructuring (10) (69) (90) (49) (60) (7) (284)
    Fair value accounting of commodity derivatives and certain gas contracts1 (1,169) (31) 69 (205) 717 — (619)
    Other1,2 (129) (143) 33 158 24 (1,103) (1,161)
    Total identified items included in Income/(loss) before taxation (1,336) (261) (1,123) (908) 668 (1,111) (4,070)
    Less: Total identified items included in Taxation charge/(credit) (197) (443) (290) 48 167 (45) (761)
    Identified items included in Income/(loss) for the period              
    Divestment gains/(losses) — 124 (56) (13) 77 — 131
    Impairment reversals/(impairments) (20) (169) (786) (860) (78) — (1,914)
    Redundancy and restructuring (6) (42) (65) (37) (44) (5) (200)
    Fair value accounting of commodity derivatives and certain gas contracts1 (985) (8) 50 (163) 529 — (576)
    Impact of exchange rate movements and inflationary adjustments on tax balances1 (17) 408 — — — 61 452
    Other1,2 (110) (131) 25 118 18 (1,122) (1,202)
    Impact on Adjusted Earnings (1,139) 182 (832) (956) 501 (1,066) (3,310)
    Impact on Adjusted Earnings attributable to non-controlling interest — — — 18 — — 18
    Impact on adjusted earnings attributable to Shell plc shareholders (1,139) 182 (832) (974) 501 (1,066) (3,328)

    1.For a detailed description, see the corresponding footnotes to the Q2 2025 identified items table above.

    2.Corporate includes reclassifications from equity to profit and loss of cumulative currency translation differences related to funding structures resulting in unfavourable movements of $1,122 million. These currency translation differences were previously recognised in other comprehensive income and accumulated in equity as part of accumulated other comprehensive income.

    The identified items categories above may include after-tax impacts of identified items of joint ventures and associates which are fully reported within “Share of profit/(loss) of joint ventures and associates” in the Consolidated Statement of Income, and fully reported as identified items included in Income/(loss) before taxation in the table above. Identified items related to subsidiaries are consolidated and reported across appropriate lines of the Consolidated Statement of Income.

    3. Earnings per share

                                       
     
    EARNINGS PER SHARE
    Quarters   Half year
    Q2 2025 Q1 2025 Q2 2024   2025 2024
    3,601    4,780    3,517    Income/(loss) attributable to Shell plc shareholders ($ million) 8,381    10,874   
               
          Weighted average number of shares used as the basis for determining:    
    5,947.9    6,033.5    6,355.4    Basic earnings per share (million) 5,990.5    6,397.7   
    6,004.7    6,087.8    6,417.6    Diluted earnings per share (million) 6,046.0    6,461.0   

             Page 25

    SHELL PLC
    2nd QUARTER 2025 AND HALF YEAR UNAUDITED RESULTS

    4. Share capital

                           
     
    ISSUED AND FULLY PAID ORDINARY SHARES OF €0.07 EACH
      Number of shares   Nominal value
    ($ million)
    At January 1, 2025 6,115,031,158      510   
    Repurchases of shares (202,687,052)     (17)  
    At June 30, 2025 5,912,344,106      493   
    At January 1, 2024 6,524,109,049      544   
    Repurchases of shares (199,993,563)     (17)  
    At June 30, 2024 6,324,115,486      528   

    At Shell plc’s Annual General Meeting on May 20, 2025, the Board was authorised to allot ordinary shares in Shell plc, and to grant rights to subscribe for, or to convert, any security into ordinary shares in Shell plc, up to an aggregate nominal amount of approximately €140 million (representing approximately 2,007 million ordinary shares of €0.07 each), and to list such shares or rights on any stock exchange. This authority expires at the earlier of the close of business on August 19, 2026, or the end of the Annual General Meeting to be held in 2026, unless previously renewed, revoked or varied by Shell plc in a general meeting.

    5. Other reserves

                                             
     
    OTHER RESERVES
    $ million Merger reserve Share premium reserve Capital redemption reserve Share plan reserve Accumulated other comprehensive income Total
    At January 1, 2025 37,298    154    270    1,417    (19,373)   19,766   
    Other comprehensive income/(loss) attributable to Shell plc shareholders —    —    —    —    6,159    6,159   
    Transfer from other comprehensive income —    —    —    —    18    18   
    Repurchases of shares —    —    17    —    —    17   
    Share-based compensation —    —    —    (486)   —    (486)  
    At June 30, 2025 37,298    154    287    930    (13,196)   25,473   
    At January 1, 2024 37,298    154    236    1,308    (17,851)   21,145   
    Other comprehensive income/(loss) attributable to Shell plc shareholders —    —    —    —    (494)   (494)  
    Transfer from other comprehensive income —    —    —    —    170    170   
    Repurchases of shares —    —    17    —    —    17   
    Share-based compensation —    —    —    (213)   —    (213)  
    At June 30, 2024 37,298    154    253    1,095    (18,175)   20,625   

    The merger reserve and share premium reserve were established as a consequence of Shell plc (formerly Royal Dutch Shell plc) becoming the single parent company of Royal Dutch Petroleum Company and The “Shell” Transport and Trading Company, p.l.c., now The Shell Transport and Trading Company Limited, in 2005. The merger reserve increased in 2016 following the issuance of shares for the acquisition of BG Group plc. The capital redemption reserve was established in connection with repurchases of shares of Shell plc. The share plan reserve is in respect of equity-settled share-based compensation plans.

    6. Derivative financial instruments and debt excluding lease liabilities

    As disclosed in the Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2024, presented in the Annual Report and Accounts and Form 20-F/A for that year, Shell is exposed to the risks of changes in fair value of its financial assets and liabilities. The fair values of the financial assets and liabilities are defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Methods and assumptions used to estimate the fair values at June 30, 2025, are consistent with those used in the year ended December 31, 2024, though the carrying amounts of derivative financial instruments have changed since that date.

             Page 26

    SHELL PLC
    2nd QUARTER 2025 AND HALF YEAR UNAUDITED RESULTS

    The movement of the derivative financial instruments between December 31, 2024 and June 30, 2025, is a decrease of $230 million for the current assets and a decrease of $940 million for the current liabilities.

    The table below provides the comparison of the fair value with the carrying amount of debt excluding lease liabilities, disclosed in accordance with IFRS 7 Financial Instruments: Disclosures.

                     
     
    DEBT EXCLUDING LEASE LIABILITIES
    $ million June 30, 2025 December 31, 2024
    Carrying amount1 46,720    48,376   
    Fair value2 42,864    44,119   

    1.    Shell issued no debt under the US shelf or under the Euro medium-term note programmes since November 2021 and September 2020, respectively. The US shelf programme has lapsed and management aims to renew it during the second half of 2025.

    2.     Mainly determined from the prices quoted for these securities.

    7. Other notes to the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements

    Consolidated Statement of Income

    Interest and other income

                                       
     
    Quarters $ million Half year
    Q2 2025 Q1 2025 Q2 2024   2025 2024
    326    302    (305)   Interest and other income/(expenses) 628    602   
          Of which:    
    559    481    616    Interest income 1,040    1,204   
    44    1    30    Dividend income (from investments in equity securities) 45    53   
    128    (127)   143    Net gains/(losses) on sales and revaluation of non-current assets and businesses 1    154   
    (447)   (137)   (1,169)   Net foreign exchange gains/(losses) on financing activities (584)   (1,103)  
    42    85    74    Other 127    293   

    Depreciation, depletion and amortisation

                                       
     
    Quarters $ million Half year
    Q2 2025 Q1 2025 Q2 2024   2025 2024
    6,670    5,441    7,555    Depreciation, depletion and amortisation 12,111    13,436   
          Of which:    
    5,463 5,130 5,642 Depreciation 10,593    11,296   
    1,238 311 1,984 Impairments 1,549    2,365   
    (31) (1) (71) Impairment reversals (32)   (225)  

    Impairments recognised in the second quarter 2025 of $1,238 million pre-tax ($877 million post-tax) principally relate to Integrated Gas ($666 million) and Marketing ($399 million). Impairments recognised in Integrated Gas were triggered by lower commodity prices applied in impairment testing.

    Impairments recognised in the second quarter 2024 of $1,984 million pre-tax ($1,778 million post-tax) mainly relate to Marketing ($1,055 million), Chemicals and Products ($690 million) and Renewables and Energy Solutions ($141 million).

    Taxation charge/credit

                                       
     
    Quarters $ million Half year
    Q2 2025 Q1 2025 Q2 2024   2025 2024
    2,332    4,083    3,754    Taxation charge/(credit) 6,415    7,358   
          Of which:    
    2,277 4,024 3,666 Income tax excluding Pillar Two income tax 6,301    7,192   
    55 59 88 Income tax related to Pillar Two income tax 113    167

             Page 27

    SHELL PLC
    2nd QUARTER 2025 AND HALF YEAR UNAUDITED RESULTS

    As required by IAS 12 Income Taxes, Shell has applied the exception to recognising and disclosing information about deferred tax assets and liabilities related to Pillar Two income taxes.

    Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income

    Currency translation differences

                                       
     
    Quarters $ million Half year
    Q2 2025 Q1 2025 Q2 2024   2025 2024
    4,127    1,711    698    Currency translation differences 5,837    (1,296)  
          Of which:    
    4,117 1,618 (406) Recognised in Other comprehensive income 5,736    (2,388)  
    9 92 1,104 (Gain)/loss reclassified to profit or loss 101    1,092

    Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet

    Assets classified as held for sale

                     
     
    $ million    
      June 30, 2025 December 31, 2024
    Assets classified as held for sale 10,619    9,857   
    Liabilities directly associated with assets classified as held for sale 7,856    6,203   

    Assets classified as held for sale and associated liabilities at June 30, 2025, principally relate to Shell’s UK offshore oil and gas assets in Upstream and mining interests in Canada in Chemicals and Products. Upon completion of the sale, Shell’s UK offshore assets will be derecognised in exchange for a 50% interest in a newly formed joint venture.

    The major classes of assets and liabilities classified as held for sale at June 30, 2025, are Property, plant and equipment ($9,759 million; December 31, 2024: $8,283 million), Deferred tax liabilities ($3,312 million; December 31, 2024: $2,042 million) and Decommissioning and other provisions ($3,165 million; December 31, 2024: $3,053 million).

    Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows

    Cash flow from operating activities – Other

                                       
     
    Quarters $ million Half year
    Q2 2025 Q1 2025 Q2 2024   2025 2024
    684    570    2,027    Other 1,254    2,536   

    ‘Cash flow from operating activities – Other’ for the second quarter 2025 includes $979 million of net inflows (first quarter 2025: $652 million net inflows; second quarter 2024: $620 million net inflows) due to the timing of payments relating to emission certificates and biofuel programmes in Europe and North America and $439 million in relation to reversal of currency exchange gains on Cash and cash equivalents (first quarter 2025: $255 million gains; second quarter 2024: $96 million losses). In addition, the second quarter 2024 includes $1,104 million inflow representing reversal of the non-cash recycling of currency translation losses from other comprehensive income.

    Dividends received from joint ventures and associates

                                       
     
    Quarters $ million Half year
    Q2 2025 Q1 2025 Q2 2024   2025 2024
    2,361    523    792    Dividends received from joint ventures and associates 2,884    1,530   

    In the second quarter 2025, a cash dividend of $1,727 million was received from a joint venture in Upstream.

    Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment and businesses

             Page 28

    SHELL PLC
    2nd QUARTER 2025 AND HALF YEAR UNAUDITED RESULTS

                                       
     
    Quarters $ million Half year
    Q2 2025 Q1 2025 Q2 2024   2025 2024
    (57)   559    710    Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment and businesses 502    1,033   

    In the second quarter 2025, Shell completed the sale of a business that held $216 million of cash and cash equivalents, that was agreed to be transferred in the sale, resulting in a cash outflow in ‘Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment and businesses’. Sales proceeds were received and recognised in the Consolidated statement of Cash Flows in the first quarter 2025.

    8. Reconciliation of Operating expenses and Total Debt

                                       
     
    RECONCILIATION OF OPERATING EXPENSES    
    Quarters $ million Half year
    Q2 2025 Q1 2025 Q2 2024   2025 2024
    4,909    5,549    5,593    Production and manufacturing expenses 10,459    11,403   
    3,077    2,840    3,094    Selling, distribution and administrative expenses 5,917    6,069   
    278    185    263    Research and development 464    475   
    8,265    8,575    8,950    Operating expenses 16,840    17,947   
                                       
     
    RECONCILIATION OF TOTAL DEBT    
         
               
    June 30, 2025 March 31, 2025 June 30, 2024 $ million June 30, 2025 June 30, 2024
    10,457    11,391    10,849    Current debt 10,457    10,849   
    65,218    65,120    64,619    Non-current debt 65,218    64,619   
    75,675    76,511    75,468    Total debt 75,675    75,468   

    9. Post-balance sheet events

    On July 1, 2023, new pension legislation (“Wet Toekomst Pensioenen” (WTP)) came into effect in the Netherlands, with an expected implementation required prior to January 1, 2028. In July 2025, the Trustee Board of the Stichting Shell Pensioen Fonds (“SSPF”), Shell’s defined benefit pension fund in the Netherlands, formally accepted the transition plan to transition from a defined benefit pension fund to a defined contribution plan with effect from January 1, 2027, subject to the local funding level of the plan remaining above an agreed level (125%) during a predetermined transition period.

    In accordance with asset ceiling principles, in the third quarter 2025, Shell will recognise an adjustment to reduce the pension fund surplus (June 30, 2025: $5,521 million) to nil, and recognise a liability for a minimum funding requirement estimated at $750 million, resulting in a loss in Other Comprehensive Income. In addition, a net deferred tax liability of $1,617 million will be unwound, leading to an overall net post-tax loss of $4,654 million recognised in Other Comprehensive Income resulting in an increase in gearing of 0.4 percentage points. Subsequently, at the date of transition and settlement (expected December 31, 2026), the surplus at that date will be de-recognised, resulting in an identified loss in the Consolidated Statement of Income. The extent to which the funding level will meet the agreed 125% threshold is subject to uncertainty and the asset ceiling recognised will continue to be monitored in accordance with IAS 19 Employee Benefits.

             Page 29

    SHELL PLC
    2nd QUARTER 2025 AND HALF YEAR UNAUDITED RESULTS

    ALTERNATIVE PERFORMANCE (NON-GAAP) MEASURES

    A.Adjusted Earnings, Adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortisation (“Adjusted EBITDA”) and Cash flow from operating activities

    The “Adjusted Earnings” measure aims to facilitate a comparative understanding of Shell’s financial performance from period to period by removing the effects of oil price changes on inventory carrying amounts and removing the effects of identified items. These items are in some cases driven by external factors and may, either individually or collectively, hinder the comparative understanding of Shell’s financial results from period to period. This measure excludes earnings attributable to non-controlling interest when presenting the total Shell Group result but includes these items when presenting individual segment Adjusted Earnings as set out in the table below.

    See Note 2 “Segment information” for the reconciliation of Adjusted Earnings.

    We define “Adjusted EBITDA” as “Income/(loss) for the period” adjusted for current cost of supplies; identified items; tax charge/(credit); depreciation, amortisation and depletion; exploration well write-offs and net interest expense. All items include the non-controlling interest component. Management uses this measure to evaluate Shell’s performance in the period and over time.

                                                   
     
    Q2 2025 $ million
      Integrated Gas Upstream Marketing Chemicals and Products Renewables and Energy Solutions Corporate Total
    Adjusted Earnings             4,264
    Add: Non-controlling interest             50
    Adjusted Earnings plus non-controlling interest 1,737 1,732 1,199 118 (9) (463) 4,314
    Add: Taxation charge/(credit) excluding tax impact of identified items 497 2,205 413 (103) 20 (217) 2,815
    Add: Depreciation, depletion and amortisation excluding impairments 1,585 2,353 557 872 90 6 5,463
    Add: Exploration well write-offs 3 203 — — — — 206
    Add: Interest expense excluding identified items 53 171 12 16 2 820 1,074
    Less: Interest income — 26 — 39 2 492 559
    Adjusted EBITDA 3,875 6,638 2,181 864 102 (346) 13,313
    Less: Current cost of supplies adjustment before taxation     104 333     436
    Joint ventures and associates (dividends received less profit) 92 1,542 161 70 10 — 1,876
    Derivative financial instruments 542 25 13 3 (66) 410 928
    Taxation paid (967) (1,948) (132) (87) (60) (238) (3,432)
    Other (265) (413) 533 471 142 (395) 74
    (Increase)/decrease in working capital 352 655 67 383 (128) (1,715) (386)
    Cash flow from operating activities 3,629 6,500 2,718 1,372 1 (2,283) 11,937
                                                   
     
    Q1 2025 $ million
      Integrated Gas Upstream Marketing Chemicals and Products Renewables and Energy Solutions Corporate Total
    Adjusted Earnings             5,577
    Add: Non-controlling interest             94
    Adjusted Earnings plus non-controlling interest 2,483 2,337 900 449 (42) (457) 5,670
    Add: Taxation charge/(credit) excluding tax impact of identified items 803 2,619 391 99 63 (191) 3,784
    Add: Depreciation, depletion and amortisation excluding impairments 1,404 2,213 566 852 90 6 5,130
    Add: Exploration well write-offs — 29 — — — — 28
    Add: Interest expense excluding identified items 51 200 12 14 2 841 1,119
    Less: Interest income 4 11 — 4 2 461 481
    Adjusted EBITDA 4,735 7,387 1,869 1,410 111 (261) 15,250
    Less: Current cost of supplies adjustment before taxation     52 (67)     (15)
    Joint ventures and associates (dividends received less profit) (286) (159) 203 54 10 — (178)
    Derivative financial instruments 542 14 10 (508) (169) 73 (38)
    Taxation paid (773) (1,999) (174) 63 52 (68) (2,900)
    Other (68) (386) 396 125 (17) (257) (206)
    (Increase)/decrease in working capital (687) (913) (344) (1,081) 380 (19) (2,663)
    Cash flow from operating activities 3,463 3,945 1,907 130 367 (531) 9,281

             Page 30

    SHELL PLC
    2nd QUARTER 2025 AND HALF YEAR UNAUDITED RESULTS

                                                   
     
    Q2 2024 $ million
      Integrated Gas Upstream Marketing Chemicals and Products Renewables and Energy Solutions Corporate Total
    Adjusted Earnings             6,293
    Add: Non-controlling interest             122
    Adjusted Earnings plus non-controlling interest 2,675 2,336 1,082 1,085 (187) (576) 6,415
    Add: Taxation charge/(credit) excluding tax impact of identified items 940 2,312 359 297 (10) 49 3,947
    Add: Depreciation, depletion and amortisation excluding impairments 1,375 2,750 548 867 95 6 5,642
    Add: Exploration well write-offs 5 264 — — — — 269
    Add: Interest expense excluding identified items 44 166 10 23 1 904 1,149
    Less: Interest income — (1) — 30 (9) 595 616
    Adjusted EBITDA 5,039 7,829 1,999 2,242 (91) (213) 16,806
    Less: Current cost of supplies adjustment before taxation     74 59     133
    Joint ventures and associates (dividends received less profit) 96 (288) (54) 46 64 — (135)
    Derivative financial instruments (133) 9 7 304 607 (79) 713
    Taxation paid (1,039) (1,955) (17) (186) (138) (113) (3,448)
    Other (104) (341) (57) 263 180 20 (38)
    (Increase)/decrease in working capital 324 484 153 (361) 225 (1,083) (258)
    Cash flow from operating activities 4,183 5,739 1,958 2,249 847 (1,468) 13,508
                                                   
     
    Half year 2025 $ million
      Integrated Gas Upstream Marketing Chemicals and Products Renewables and Energy Solutions Corporate Total
    Adjusted Earnings             9,841
    Add: Non-controlling interest             144
    Adjusted Earnings plus non-controlling interest 4,220 4,068 2,100 567 (51) (920) 9,984
    Add: Taxation charge/(credit) excluding tax impact of identified items 1,299 4,824 804 (3) 83 (408) 6,599
    Add: Depreciation, depletion and amortisation excluding impairments 2,988 4,566 1,123 1,724 180 13 10,593
    Add: Exploration well write-offs 3 232 — — — — 234
    Add: Interest expense excluding identified items 104 371 24 29 4 1,661 2,193
    Less: Interest income 4 37 1 43 3 953 1,040
    Adjusted EBITDA 8,610 14,024 4,049 2,274 213 (607) 28,563
    Less: Current cost of supplies adjustment before taxation     156 266     422
    Joint ventures and associates (dividends received less profit) (194) 1,384 365 124 20 — 1,698
    Derivative financial instruments 1,084 39 23 (504) (235) 484 891
    Taxation paid (1,741) (3,946) (306) (24) (8) (306) (6,331)
    Other (332) (799) 928 597 126 (651) (132)
    (Increase)/decrease in working capital (335) (257) (277) (698) 252 (1,734) (3,049)
    Cash flow from operating activities 7,092 10,445 4,625 1,502 368 (2,814) 21,218
                                                   
     
    Half year 2024 $ million
      Integrated Gas Upstream Marketing Chemicals and Products Renewables and Energy Solutions Corporate Total
    Adjusted Earnings             14,027
    Add: Non-controlling interest             192
    Adjusted Earnings plus non-controlling interest 6,354 4,270 1,863 2,700 (24) (944) 14,219
    Add: Taxation charge/(credit) excluding tax impact of identified items 1,936 4,834 717 635 (9) (42) 8,071
    Add: Depreciation, depletion and amortisation excluding impairments 2,785 5,477 1,084 1,737 201 12 11,296
    Add: Exploration well write-offs 13 811 — — — — 823
    Add: Interest expense excluding identified items 87 335 22 40 2 1,825 2,312
    Less: Interest income — 9 — 44 (5) 1,155 1,204
    Adjusted EBITDA 11,175 15,717 3,686 5,068 175 (304) 35,517
    Less: Current cost of supplies adjustment before taxation     (79) (148)     (227)
    Joint ventures and associates (dividends received less profit) (101) (834) 38 102 78 — (717)
    Derivative financial instruments (1,213) 5 (32) (98) 2,585 (228) 1,019
    Taxation paid (1,506) (3,757) (191) (205) (382) (23) (6,064)
    Other (59) (572) 337 (115) 151 124 (135)
    (Increase)/decrease in working capital 599 905 (639) (3,000) 706 (1,581) (3,010)
    Cash flow from operating activities 8,895 11,466 3,277 1,900 3,313 (2,013) 26,838

             Page 31

    SHELL PLC
    2nd QUARTER 2025 AND HALF YEAR UNAUDITED RESULTS

    Identified items

    The objective of identified items is to remove material impacts on net income/loss arising from transactions which are generally uncontrollable and unusual (infrequent or non-recurring) in nature or giving rise to a mismatch between accounting and economic results, or certain transactions that are generally excluded from underlying results in the industry.

    Identified items comprise: divestment gains and losses, impairments and impairment reversals, redundancy and restructuring, fair value accounting of commodity derivatives and certain gas contracts that gives rise to a mismatch between accounting and economic results, the impact of exchange rate movements and inflationary adjustments on certain deferred tax balances, and other items.

    See Note 2 “Segment information” for details.

    B.    Adjusted Earnings per share

    Adjusted Earnings per share is calculated as Adjusted Earnings (see Reference A), divided by the weighted average number of shares used as the basis for basic earnings per share (see Note 3).

    C.    Cash capital expenditure

    Cash capital expenditure represents cash spent on maintaining and developing assets as well as on investments in the period. Management regularly monitors this measure as a key lever to delivering sustainable cash flows. Cash capital expenditure is the sum of the following lines from the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows: Capital expenditure, Investments in joint ventures and associates and Investments in equity securities.

    See Note 2 “Segment information” for the reconciliation of cash capital expenditure.

    D.    Capital employed and Return on average capital employed

    Return on average capital employed (“ROACE”) measures the efficiency of Shell’s utilisation of the capital that it employs.

    The measure refers to Capital employed which consists of total equity, current debt, and non-current debt reduced by cash and cash equivalents.

    In this calculation, the sum of Adjusted Earnings (see Reference A) plus non-controlling interest (NCI) excluding identified items for the current and previous three quarters, adjusted for after-tax interest expense and after-tax interest income, is expressed as a percentage of the average capital employed excluding cash and cash equivalents for the same period.

                           
     
    $ million Quarters
      Q2 2025 Q1 2025 Q2 2024
    Current debt 10,849 11,046 12,114
    Non-current debt 64,619 68,886 72,252
    Total equity 187,190 188,304 192,094
    Less: Cash and cash equivalents (38,148) (39,949) (45,094)
    Capital employed – opening 224,511 228,286 231,366
    Current debt 10,457 11,391 10,849
    Non-current debt 65,218 65,120 64,619
    Total equity 183,088 180,670 187,190
    Less: Cash and cash equivalents (32,682) (35,601) (38,148)
    Capital employed – closing 226,081 221,580 224,511
    Capital employed – average 225,296 224,933 227,939

             Page 32

    SHELL PLC
    2nd QUARTER 2025 AND HALF YEAR UNAUDITED RESULTS

                           
     
    $ million Quarters
      Q2 2025 Q1 2025 Q2 2024
    Adjusted Earnings – current and previous three quarters (Reference A) 19,529 21,558 27,558
    Add: Income/(loss) attributable to NCI – current and previous three quarters 351 441 409
    Add: Current cost of supplies adjustment attributable to NCI – current and previous three quarters 25 25 (25)
    Less: Identified items attributable to NCI (Reference A) – current and previous three quarters 0 18 7
    Adjusted Earnings plus NCI excluding identified items – current and previous three quarters 19,904 22,005 27,935
    Add: Interest expense after tax – current and previous three quarters 2,577 2,639 2,650
    Less: Interest income after tax on cash and cash equivalents – current and previous three quarters 1,206 1,329 1,395
    Adjusted Earnings plus NCI excluding identified items before interest expense and interest income – current and previous three quarters 21,274 23,315 29,190
    Capital employed – average 225,296 224,933 227,939
    ROACE on an Adjusted Earnings plus NCI basis 9.4% 10.4% 12.8%

    E.    Net debt and gearing

    Net debt is defined as the sum of current and non-current debt, less cash and cash equivalents, adjusted for the fair value of derivative financial instruments used to hedge foreign exchange and interest rate risk relating to debt, and associated collateral balances. Management considers this adjustment useful because it reduces the volatility of net debt caused by fluctuations in foreign exchange and interest rates, and eliminates the potential impact of related collateral payments or receipts. Debt-related derivative financial instruments are a subset of the derivative financial instrument assets and liabilities presented on the balance sheet. Collateral balances are reported under “Trade and other receivables” or “Trade and other payables” as appropriate.

    Gearing is a measure of Shell’s capital structure and is defined as net debt (total debt less cash and cash equivalents) as a percentage of total capital (net debt plus total equity).

                           
     
    $ million  
      June 30, 2025 March 31, 2025 June 30, 2024
    Current debt 10,457    11,391    10,849   
    Non-current debt 65,218    65,120    64,619   
    Total debt 75,675    76,511    75,468   
    Of which: Lease liabilities 28,955    28,488    25,600   
    Add: Debt-related derivative financial instruments: net liability/(asset) 589    1,905    2,460   
    Add: Collateral on debt-related derivatives: net liability/(asset) (366)   (1,295)   (1,466)  
    Less: Cash and cash equivalents (32,682)   (35,601)   (38,148)  
    Net debt 43,216    41,521    38,314   
    Total equity 183,088    180,670    187,190   
    Total capital 226,304    222,190    225,505   
    Gearing 19.1  % 18.7  % 17.0  %

    F.    Operating expenses and Underlying operating expenses

    Operating expenses

    Operating expenses is a measure of Shell’s cost management performance, comprising the following items from the Consolidated Statement of Income: production and manufacturing expenses; selling, distribution and administrative expenses; and research and development expenses.

             Page 33

    SHELL PLC
    2nd QUARTER 2025 AND HALF YEAR UNAUDITED RESULTS

                                                   
       
    Q2 2025 $ million
      Integrated Gas Upstream Marketing Chemicals and Products Renewables and Energy Solutions Corporate Total
    Production and manufacturing expenses 899 1,940 179 1,459 431 — 4,909
    Selling, distribution and administrative expenses 30 43 2,319 441 138 106 3,077
    Research and development 36 71 49 38 23 61 278
    Operating expenses 965 2,055 2,547 1,939 592 168 8,265
                                                   
       
    Q1 2025 $ million
      Integrated Gas Upstream Marketing Chemicals and Products Renewables and Energy Solutions Corporate Total
    Production and manufacturing expenses 947 2,139 349 1,621 486 8 5,549
    Selling, distribution and administrative expenses 38 42 2,053 442 153 111 2,840
    Research and development 22 32 42 25 21 43 185
    Operating expenses 1,006 2,213 2,444 2,088 661 162 8,575
                                                   
       
    Q2 2024 $ million
      Integrated Gas Upstream Marketing Chemicals and Products Renewables and Energy Solutions Corporate Total
    Production and manufacturing expenses 1,050 2,219 320 1,573 422 10 5,593
    Selling, distribution and administrative expenses 64 62 2,295 293 279 101 3,094
    Research and development 32 61 47 37 24 62 263
    Operating expenses 1,146 2,341 2,662 1,902 725 173 8,950
                                                   
       
    Half year 2025 $ million
      Integrated Gas Upstream Marketing Chemicals and Products Renewables and Energy Solutions Corporate Total
    Production and manufacturing expenses 1,846 4,079 528 3,080 916 8 10,459
    Selling, distribution and administrative expenses 67 85 4,371 884 292 218 5,917
    Research and development 57 103 92 63 44 104 464
    Operating expenses 1,971 4,268 4,991 4,027 1,253 330 16,840
                                                   
       
    Half year 2024 $ million
      Integrated Gas Upstream Marketing Chemicals and Products Renewables and Energy Solutions Corporate Total
    Production and manufacturing expenses 2,006 4,487 685 3,207 1,001 16 11,403
    Selling, distribution and administrative expenses 126 120 4,483 713 437 190 6,069
    Research and development 58 119 81 71 36 111 475
    Operating expenses 2,190 4,726 5,249 3,990 1,475 317 17,947

    Underlying operating expenses

    Underlying operating expenses is a measure aimed at facilitating a comparative understanding of performance from period to period by removing the effects of identified items, which, either individually or collectively, can cause volatility, in some cases driven by external factors.

             Page 34

    SHELL PLC
    2nd QUARTER 2025 AND HALF YEAR UNAUDITED RESULTS

                                       
         
    Quarters $ million Half year
    Q2 2025 Q1 2025 Q2 2024   2025 2024
    8,265    8,575    8,950    Operating expenses 16,840    17,947   
    (119)   (44)   (210)   Redundancy and restructuring (charges)/reversal (162)   (283)  
    (1)   (101)   (212)   (Provisions)/reversal (102)   (212)  
    —    23    123    Other 23    252   
    (120)   (121)   (299)   Total identified items (241)   (242)  
    8,145    8,453    8,651    Underlying operating expenses 16,598    17,704   

    G.    Free cash flow and Organic free cash flow

    Free cash flow is used to evaluate cash available for financing activities, including dividend payments and debt servicing, after investment in maintaining and growing the business. It is defined as the sum of “Cash flow from operating activities” and “Cash flow from investing activities”.

    Cash flows from acquisition and divestment activities are removed from Free cash flow to arrive at the Organic free cash flow, a measure used by management to evaluate the generation of free cash flow without these activities.

                                       
     
    Quarters $ million Half year
    Q2 2025 Q1 2025 Q2 2024   2025 2024
    11,937    9,281    13,508    Cash flow from operating activities 21,218    26,838   
    (5,406)   (3,959)   (3,338)   Cash flow from investing activities (9,365)   (6,866)  
    6,531    5,322    10,170    Free cash flow 11,853    19,972   
    (36)   597    769    Less: Divestment proceeds (Reference I) 560    1,794   
    98    45    —    Add: Tax paid on divestments (reported under “Other investing cash outflows”) 143    —   
    792    130    189    Add: Cash outflows related to inorganic capital expenditure1 921    251   
    7,458    4,899    9,590    Organic free cash flow2 12,357    18,429   

    1.Cash outflows related to inorganic capital expenditure includes portfolio actions which expand Shell’s activities through acquisitions and restructuring activities as reported in capital expenditure lines in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows.

    2.Free cash flow less divestment proceeds, adding back outflows related to inorganic expenditure.

    H.    Cash flow from operating activities excluding working capital movements

    Working capital movements are defined as the sum of the following items in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows: (i) (increase)/decrease in inventories, (ii) (increase)/decrease in current receivables, and (iii) increase/(decrease) in current payables.

    Cash flow from operating activities excluding working capital movements is a measure used by Shell to analyse its operating cash generation over time excluding the timing effects of changes in inventories and operating receivables and payables from period to period.

                                       
     
    Quarters $ million Half year
    Q2 2025 Q1 2025 Q2 2024   2025 2024
    11,937    9,281    13,508    Cash flow from operating activities 21,218    26,838   
    (27)   854    (954)   (Increase)/decrease in inventories 827    (1,562)  
    3,635    (2,610)   1,965    (Increase)/decrease in current receivables 1,025    1,770   
    (3,994)   (907)   (1,269)   Increase/(decrease) in current payables (4,901)   (3,218)  
    (386)   (2,663)   (258)   (Increase)/decrease in working capital (3,049)   (3,010)  
    12,323    11,944    13,766    Cash flow from operating activities excluding working capital movements 24,267    29,848   

    I.    Divestment proceeds

    Divestment proceeds represent cash received from divestment activities in the period. Management regularly monitors this measure as a key lever to deliver free cash flow.

             Page 35

    SHELL PLC
    2nd QUARTER 2025 AND HALF YEAR UNAUDITED RESULTS

                                       
     
    Quarters $ million Half year
    Q2 2025 Q1 2025 Q2 2024   2025 2024
    (57)   559 710 Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment and businesses 502 1,033
    1    33 57 Proceeds from joint ventures and associates from sale, capital reduction and repayment of long-term loans 34 190
    19    5 2 Proceeds from sale of equity securities 24 570
    (36)   597 769 Divestment proceeds 560 1,794

    J.    Structural cost reduction

    The structural cost reduction target is used for the purpose of demonstrating how management drives cost discipline across the entire organisation, simplifying our processes and portfolio, and streamlining the way we work.

    Structural cost reduction describes the decrease in underlying operating expenses (see Reference F above) as a result of operational efficiencies, divestments, workforce reductions and other cost-saving measures that are expected to be sustainable compared with 2022 levels.

    The total change between periods in underlying operating expenses will reflect both structural cost reductions and other changes in spend, including market factors, such as inflation and foreign exchange impacts, as well as changes in activity levels and costs associated with new operations.

    Structural cost reductions are stewarded internally to support management’s oversight of spending over time. The 2028 target reflects annualised saving achieved by end-2028.

               
       
      $ million
    Structural cost reduction up to second quarter 2025 compared with 2022 levels (3,905)  
       
    Underlying operating expenses 2024 35,707
    Underlying operating expenses 2022 39,456
    Total decrease in Underlying operating expenses (3,749)  
    Of which:  
    Structural cost reductions (3,119)  
    Change in Underlying operating expenses excluding structural cost reduction (630)  
       
    Underlying operating expenses first half 2025 16,598
    Underlying operating expenses first half 2024 17,704   
    Total decrease in Underlying operating expenses (1,106)  
    Of which:  
    Structural cost reductions (786)  
    Change in Underlying operating expenses excluding structural cost reduction (320)  

             Page 36

    SHELL PLC
    2nd QUARTER 2025 AND HALF YEAR UNAUDITED RESULTS

    PRINCIPAL RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES

    The principal risks and uncertainties affecting Shell are described in the Risk management and risk factors section of the Annual Report and Accounts (pages 134 to 144) and Form 20-F (pages 25 to 34) for the year ended December 31, 2024 and are summarised below. There are no material changes expected in those Risk Factors for the remaining six months of the financial year.

    1.Portfolio risks

    We are exposed to risks that could adversely affect the resilience of our overall portfolio of businesses. These include external risks such as macroeconomic risks, including fluctuating commodity prices and competitive forces. Our future performance depends on the successful development and deployment of new technologies that provide new products and solutions. In addition, our future hydrocarbon production depends on the delivery of integrated projects and our ability to replace proved oil and gas reserves. Many of our major projects and operations are conducted in joint arrangements or with associates. This could reduce our degree of control and our ability to identify and manage risks.

    2.Climate change and the energy transition

    Rising concerns about climate change and the effects of the energy transition pose multiple risks to Shell, including declines in the demand for and prices of our products, commercial risks from growing our low-carbon business, and adverse litigation and regulatory developments. The physical impacts of climate change could also adversely affect our assets and supply chains.

    3.Country risks

    We operate in more than 70 countries which have differing degrees of political, legal and fiscal stability. This has exposed, and could expose, us to a wide range of political developments that could result in changes to contractual terms, laws and regulations.

    4.Financial risks

    We are exposed to treasury risks, including liquidity risk, interest rate risk, foreign exchange risk and credit risk. We are affected by the global macroeconomic environment and the conditions of financial markets. These, and changes to certain demographic factors, also impact our pension assets and liabilities.

    5.Trading risks

    We are exposed to market, regulatory and conduct risks in our trading operations.

    6.Health, safety, security and the environment

    The nature of our operations exposes us, and the communities in which we work, to a wide range of health, safety, security and environment risks.

    7.Information technology and cybersecurity risks

    We rely heavily on information technology systems in our operations.

    8.Litigation and regulatory compliance

    Violations of laws carry fines and could expose us and/or our employees to criminal sanctions and civil suits. We have faced, and could also face, the risk of litigation and disputes worldwide.

    9.Reputation and risks to our licence to operate

    An erosion of our business reputation could have a material adverse effect on our brand, on our ability to secure new hydrocarbon or low-carbon opportunities, to access capital markets, and to attract and retain people, and on our licence to operate.

    10.Our people and culture

    The successful delivery of our strategy is dependent on our people and on a culture that aligns to our goals and reflects the changes we need to make as part of the energy transition.

    11.Other (generally applicable to an investment in securities)

    The Company’s Articles of Association determine the jurisdiction for shareholder disputes. This could limit shareholder remedies.

             Page 37

    SHELL PLC
    2nd QUARTER 2025 AND HALF YEAR UNAUDITED RESULTS

    2025 PORTFOLIO DEVELOPMENTS

    Integrated Gas

    In March 2025, we completed the previously announced acquisition of 100% of the shares in Pavilion Energy Pte. Ltd. (Pavilion Energy). Pavilion Energy, headquartered in Singapore, operates a global LNG trading business with contracted supply volume of approximately 6.5 million tonnes per annum (mtpa).

    In June 2025, we announced that the first cargo of liquefied natural gas (LNG) had left the LNG Canada facility on the west coast of Canada. Shell has a 40% working interest in the LNG Canada joint venture. Located in Kitimat, British Columbia, the facility will export LNG from two processing units or “trains” with a total capacity of 14 million tonnes per annum (mtpa).

    Upstream

    In January 2025, we announced the start of production at the Shell-operated Whale floating production facility in the Gulf of America. The Whale development is owned by Shell (60%, operator) and Chevron U.S.A. Inc. (40%).

    In February 2025, we announced production restart at the Penguins field in the UK North Sea with a modern floating, production, storage and offloading (FPSO) facility (Shell 50%, operator; NEO Energy 50%). The previous export route for this field was via the Brent Charlie platform, which ceased production in 2021 and is being decommissioned.

    In March 2025, we completed the sale of SPDC to Renaissance, as announced in January 2024.

    In March 2025, we announced the Final Investment Decision (FID) for Gato do Mato, a deep-water project in the pre-salt area of the Santos Basin, offshore Brazil. The Gato do Mato Consortium includes Shell (operator, 50%), Ecopetrol (30%), TotalEnergies (20%) and Pré-Sal Petróleo S.A. (PPSA) acting as the manager of the production sharing contract (PSC).

    In May 2025, we completed the previously announced agreement to increase our working interest in the Shell-operated Ursa platform in the Gulf of America from 45.39% to 61.35%.

    In May 2025, we announced the start of production at the floating production storage and offloading facility (FPSO) Alexandre de Gusmão in the Mero field in the Santos Basin offshore Brazil. The unitized Mero field is operated by Petrobras (38.6%), in partnership with Shell Brasil (19.3%), TotalEnergies (19.3%), CNPC (9.65%), CNOOC (9.65%) and Pré-Sal Petróleo S.A. (PPSA) (3.5%) representing the Government in the non-contracted area.

    In May 2025, we signed an agreement to acquire a 12.5% interest in the OML 118 Production Sharing Contract (OML 118 PSC) from TotalEnergies EP Nigeria Limited. Upon completion, Shell’s working interest in the OML 118 PSC is expected to increase from 55% to a maximum of 67.5%.

    Chemicals and Products

    In January 2025, CNOOC and Shell Petrochemicals Company Limited (CSPC), a 50:50 joint venture between Shell and CNOOC Petrochemicals Investment Ltd, took an FID to expand its petrochemical complex in Daya Bay, Huizhou, south China.

    In April 2025, we completed the previously announced sale of our Energy and Chemicals Park in Singapore to CAPGC Pte. Ltd. (CAPGC), a joint venture between Chandra Asri Capital Pte. Ltd. and Glencore Asian Holdings Pte. Ltd.

    In April 2025, we agreed to sell our 16.125% interest in Colonial Enterprises, Inc. (“Colonial”) to Colossus AcquireCo LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P. and its institutional partners (collectively, “Brookfield”), for $1.45 billion. The transaction is subject to regulatory approvals and is expected to close in the fourth quarter of 2025.

    Renewables and Energy Solutions

    In January 2025, we completed the previously announced acquisition of a 100% equity stake in RISEC Holdings, LLC, which owns a 609-megawatt (MW) two-unit combined-cycle gas turbine power plant in Rhode Island, USA.

             Page 38

    SHELL PLC
    2nd QUARTER 2025 AND HALF YEAR UNAUDITED RESULTS

    RESPONSIBILITY STATEMENT

    It is confirmed that to the best of our knowledge: (a) the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with IAS 34 Interim Financial Reporting as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”) and as adopted by the UK; (b) the interim management report includes a fair review of the information required by Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rule (DTR) 4.2.7R (indication of important events during the first six months of the financial year, and their impact on the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements, and description of principal risks and uncertainties for the remaining six months of the financial year); and (c) the interim management report includes a fair review of the information required by DTR 4.2.8R (disclosure of related parties transactions and changes thereto).

    The Directors of Shell plc are shown on pages 152 to 155 in the Annual Report and Accounts for the year ended December 31, 2024.

    On behalf of the Board

                                 
    Wael Sawan   Sinead Gorman    
    Chief Executive Officer   Chief Financial Officer    
    July 31, 2025   July 31, 2025    

             Page 39

    SHELL PLC
    2nd QUARTER 2025 AND HALF YEAR UNAUDITED RESULTS

    INDEPENDENT REVIEW REPORT TO SHELL PLC

    Conclusion

    We have been engaged by Shell plc to review the Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements (“Interim Statements”) and half year unaudited results (“half-yearly financial report”) for the six months ended June 30, 2025, which comprise the Consolidated Statement of Income, the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income, the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet, the Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity, the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows and Notes 1 to 9. We have read the other information contained in the half-yearly financial report and considered whether it contains any apparent misstatements or material inconsistencies with the information in the Interim Statements.

    Based on our review, nothing has come to our attention that causes us to believe that the Interim Statements in the half-yearly financial report for the six months ended June 30, 2025 are not prepared, in all material respects, in accordance with UK adopted International Accounting Standard 34 and the Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules of the United Kingdom’s Financial Conduct Authority.

    Basis for Conclusion

    We conducted our review in accordance with International Standard on Review Engagements (“ISRE”) 2410 (UK), “Review of Interim Financial Information Performed by the Independent Auditor of the Entity” (ISRE) issued by the Financial Reporting Council. A review of interim financial information consists of making enquiries, primarily of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters, and applying analytical and other review procedures. A review is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (UK) and consequently does not enable us to obtain assurance that we would become aware of all significant matters that might be identified in an audit. Accordingly, we do not express an audit opinion.

    As disclosed in Note 1, Shell’s annual financial statements are prepared in accordance with UK adopted international accounting standards. The Interim Statements included in the half-yearly financial report have been prepared in accordance with UK adopted International Accounting Standard 34 “Interim Financial Reporting”.

    Conclusions Relating to Going Concern

    Based on our review procedures, which are less extensive than those performed in an audit as described in the Basis of Conclusion section of this report, nothing has come to our attention to suggest that management have inappropriately adopted the going concern basis of accounting or that management have identified material uncertainties relating to going concern that are not appropriately disclosed.

    This conclusion is based on the review procedures performed in accordance with this ISRE, however future events or conditions may cause the entity to cease to continue as a going concern.

    Responsibilities of the Directors

    The Directors are responsible for preparing the half-yearly financial report in accordance with the Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules of the United Kingdom’s Financial Conduct Authority.

    In preparing the half-yearly financial report, the Directors are responsible for assessing the company’s ability to continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless the Directors either intend to liquidate the company or to cease operations, or have no realistic alternative but to do so.

    Auditor’s Responsibilities for the review of the financial information

    In reviewing the half-yearly financial report, we are responsible for expressing to Shell plc a conclusion on the Interim Statements in the half-yearly financial report. Our conclusion, including our Conclusions Relating to Going Concern are based on procedures that are less extensive than audit procedures, as described in the Basis for Conclusion paragraph of this report.

    Use of our report

    This report is made solely to Shell plc in accordance with guidance contained in the International Standard on Review Engagements 2410 (UK) “Review of Interim Financial Information Performed by the Independent Auditor of the Entity” issued by the Financial Reporting Council. To the fullest extent permitted by law, we do not accept or assume responsibility to anyone other than Shell plc, for our work, for this report, or for the conclusions we have formed.

    Ernst & Young LLP

    London

    July 31, 2025

             Page 40

    SHELL PLC
    2nd QUARTER 2025 AND HALF YEAR UNAUDITED RESULTS

    CAUTIONARY STATEMENT

    All amounts shown throughout this Unaudited Condensed Interim Financial Report are unaudited. All peak production figures in Portfolio Developments are quoted at 100% expected production. The numbers presented throughout this Unaudited Condensed Interim Financial Report may not sum precisely to the totals provided and percentages may not precisely reflect the absolute figures, due to rounding.

    The companies in which Shell plc directly and indirectly owns investments are separate legal entities. In this Unaudited Condensed Interim Financial Report, “Shell”, “Shell Group” and “Group” are sometimes used for convenience to reference Shell plc and its subsidiaries in general. Likewise, the words “we”, “us” and “our” are also used to refer to Shell plc and its subsidiaries in general or to those who work for them. These terms are also used where no useful purpose is served by identifying the particular entity or entities. ‘‘Subsidiaries’’, “Shell subsidiaries” and “Shell companies” as used in this Unaudited Condensed Interim Financial Report, refer to entities over which Shell plc either directly or indirectly has control. The terms “joint venture”, “joint operations”, “joint arrangements”, and “associates” may also be used to refer to a commercial arrangement in which Shell has a direct or indirect ownership interest with one or more parties. The term “Shell interest” is used for convenience to indicate the direct and/or indirect ownership interest held by Shell in an entity or unincorporated joint arrangement, after exclusion of all third-party interest.

    Forward-Looking statements

    This Unaudited Condensed Interim Financial Report contains forward-looking statements (within the meaning of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995) concerning the financial condition, results of operations and businesses of Shell. All statements other than statements of historical fact are, or may be deemed to be, forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are statements of future expectations that are based on management’s current expectations and assumptions and involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results, performance or events to differ materially from those expressed or implied in these statements. Forward-looking statements include, among other things, statements concerning the potential exposure of Shell to market risks and statements expressing management’s expectations, beliefs, estimates, forecasts, projections and assumptions. These forward-looking statements are identified by their use of terms and phrases such as “aim”; “ambition”; ‘‘anticipate’’; “aspire”, “aspiration”, ‘‘believe’’; “commit”; “commitment”; ‘‘could’’; “desire”; ‘‘estimate’’; ‘‘expect’’; ‘‘goals’’; ‘‘intend’’; ‘‘may’’; “milestones”; ‘‘objectives’’; ‘‘outlook’’; ‘‘plan’’; ‘‘probably’’; ‘‘project’’; ‘‘risks’’; “schedule”; ‘‘seek’’; ‘‘should’’; ‘‘target’’; “vision”; ‘‘will’’; “would” and similar terms and phrases. There are a number of factors that could affect the future operations of Shell and could cause those results to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements included in this Unaudited Condensed Interim Financial Report, including (without limitation): (a) price fluctuations in crude oil and natural gas; (b) changes in demand for Shell’s products; (c) currency fluctuations; (d) drilling and production results; (e) reserves estimates; (f) loss of market share and industry competition; (g) environmental and physical risks, including climate change; (h) risks associated with the identification of suitable potential acquisition properties and targets, and successful negotiation and completion of such transactions; (i) the risk of doing business in developing countries and countries subject to international sanctions; (j) legislative, judicial, fiscal and regulatory developments including tariffs and regulatory measures addressing climate change; (k) economic and financial market conditions in various countries and regions; (l) political risks, including the risks of expropriation and renegotiation of the terms of contracts with governmental entities, delays or advancements in the approval of projects and delays in the reimbursement for shared costs; (m) risks associated with the impact of pandemics, regional conflicts, such as the Russia-Ukraine war and the conflict in the Middle East, and a significant cyber security, data privacy or IT incident; (n) the pace of the energy transition; and (o) changes in trading conditions. No assurance is provided that future dividend payments will match or exceed previous dividend payments. All forward-looking statements contained in this Unaudited Condensed Interim Financial Report are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained or referred to in this section. Readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. Additional risk factors that may affect future results are contained in Shell plc’s Form 20-F and amendment thereto for the year ended December 31, 2024 (available at www.shell.com/investors/news-and-filings/sec-filings.html and www.sec.gov). These risk factors also expressly qualify all forward-looking statements contained in this Unaudited Condensed Interim Financial Report and should be considered by the reader. Each forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date of this Unaudited Condensed Interim Financial Report, July 31, 2025. Neither Shell plc nor any of its subsidiaries undertake any obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement as a result of new information, future events or other information. In light of these risks, results could differ materially from those stated, implied or inferred from the forward-looking statements contained in this Unaudited Condensed Interim Financial Report.

    Shell’s net carbon intensity

    Also, in this Unaudited Condensed Interim Financial Report we may refer to Shell’s “net carbon intensity” (NCI), which includes Shell’s carbon emissions from the production of our energy products, our suppliers’ carbon emissions in supplying energy for that production and our customers’ carbon emissions associated with their use of the energy products we sell. Shell’s NCI also includes the emissions associated with the production and use of energy products produced by others which Shell purchases for resale. Shell only controls its own emissions. The use of the terms Shell’s “net carbon intensity” or NCI is for convenience only and not intended to suggest these emissions are those of Shell plc or its subsidiaries.

    Shell’s net-zero emissions target

    Shell’s operating plan and outlook are forecasted for a three-year period and ten-year period, respectively, and are updated every year. They reflect the current economic environment and what we can reasonably expect to see over the next three and ten years. Accordingly, the outlook reflects our Scope 1, Scope 2 and NCI targets over the next ten years. However, Shell’s operating plan and outlook cannot reflect our 2050 net-zero emissions target, as this target is outside our planning period. Such future operating plans and outlooks could include changes to our portfolio, efficiency improvements and the use of carbon capture and storage and carbon credits. In the future, as society moves towards net-zero emissions, we expect Shell’s operating plans and outlooks to reflect this movement. However, if society is not net zero in 2050, as of today, there would be significant risk that Shell may not meet this target.

    Forward-Looking non-GAAP measures

    This Unaudited Condensed Interim Financial Report may contain certain forward-looking non-GAAP measures such as cash capital expenditure and Adjusted Earnings. We are unable to provide a reconciliation of these forward-looking non-GAAP measures to the most comparable GAAP financial measures because certain information needed to reconcile those non-GAAP measures to the most comparable GAAP financial measures is dependent on future events some of which are outside the control of Shell, such as oil and gas prices, interest rates and exchange rates. Moreover, estimating such GAAP measures with the required precision necessary to provide a meaningful reconciliation is extremely difficult and could not be accomplished without unreasonable effort. Non-GAAP measures in respect of future periods which cannot be reconciled to the most comparable GAAP financial measure are calculated in a manner which is consistent with the accounting policies applied in Shell plc’s consolidated financial statements.

    The contents of websites referred to in this Unaudited Condensed Interim Financial Report do not form part of this Unaudited Condensed Interim Financial Report.

             Page 41

    SHELL PLC
    2nd QUARTER 2025 AND HALF YEAR UNAUDITED RESULTS

    We may have used certain terms, such as resources, in this Unaudited Condensed Interim Financial Report that the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) strictly prohibits us from including in our filings with the SEC. Investors are urged to consider closely the disclosure in our Form 20-F and any amendment thereto, File No 1-32575, available on the SEC website www.sec.gov.

    This announcement contains inside information.

    July 31, 2025

         
    The information in this Unaudited Condensed Interim Financial Report reflects the unaudited consolidated financial position and results of Shell plc. Company No. 4366849, Registered Office: Shell Centre, London, SE1 7NA, England, UK.

    Contacts:

    – Sean Ashley, Company Secretary

    – Media: International +44 (0) 207 934 5550; U.S. and Canada: https://www.shell.us/about-us/news-and-insights/media/submit-an-inquiry.html

    LEI number of Shell plc: 21380068P1DRHMJ8KU70

    Classification: Half yearly financial reports and audit reports / limited reviews; Inside Information

             Page 42

    The MIL Network –

  • All seven accused acquitted in 2008 Malegaon blast case by NIA court

    Source: Government of India

    Source: Government of India (4)

    In a major verdict, a special National Investigation Agency (NIA) court on Thursday acquitted all seven accused in the 2008 Malegaon blast case, including BJP MP Sadhvi Pragya Singh Thakur and Lt Colonel Prasad Shrikant Purohit.

    The court dropped all charges under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA), the Arms Act, and the Indian Penal Code (IPC), citing lack of sufficient evidence.

    The blast occurred on September 29, 2008, when a bomb strapped to a motorcycle exploded near the Bhikku Chowk mosque in Malegaon, Nashik district, Maharashtra. The explosion took place during the holy month of Ramzan and just ahead of the Hindu festival of Navratri. It claimed six lives and injured over 100 people in the communally sensitive town.

    The verdict, delivered after nearly 17 years of legal proceedings, came in a packed courtroom where all accused were present as per the court’s direction. The court also ordered compensation of ₹2 lakh to the families of each of the six deceased and ₹50,000 to each injured victim.

    The trial involved a massive case file exceeding one lakh pages. Hearings concluded in April this year, and the court had reserved its judgment on April 19. Due to the scale and complexity of the case, the court took additional time to scrutinise the material thoroughly before pronouncing the verdict.

    During the trial, the prosecution examined 323 witnesses. However, 34 of them turned hostile, significantly weakening the prosecution’s case.

    The case was initially investigated by the Maharashtra Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS), which arrested the accused and filed the first charge sheet. In 2011, the probe was transferred to the NIA, which filed a supplementary charge sheet in 2016, dropping charges against several accused, including Sadhvi Pragya, citing insufficient evidence under stringent anti-terror laws.

    All accused were out on bail during the trial. They had been facing serious charges including conspiracy, murder, and use of explosives under the UAPA and IPC.

    — IANS

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Anna Politkovskaya-Arman Soldin Prize for Courage in Journalism – Call for applications

    Source: Republic of France in English
    The Republic of France has issued the following statement:

    The Anna Politkovskaya-Arman Soldin Prize for Courage in Journalism will be awarded for the third time in early November 2025, to coincide with the International Day to End Impunity for Crimes Against Journalists, established in 2013 by the United Nations at France’s initiative, in memory of French journalists Ghislaine Dupont and Claude Verlon, assassinated in Mali.

    The aim of this prize is to distinguish the work of journalists and photojournalists committed to carrying out their essential role of informing people, in particular in theatres of conflict or during crises.

    Through this prize, France reaffirms its steadfast commitment to the defence of freedom of the press and pays tribute to two emblematic figures of journalistic courage, killed in the performance of their duties. First, the Russian journalist Anna Politkovskaya, whose investigations published in the Novaya Gazeta on corruption, human rights violations and the war in Chechnya cost her her life, along with six of her colleagues. Second, the Franco-Bosnian AFP journalist and photojournalist Arman Soldin, killed on 9 May 2023 in the field, whose work helped inform the entire world of the reality of Russia’s aggression against Ukraine.

    In 2024, the jury decided to recognize the work of Yuval Abraha, Israeli journalist, and Basel Adra, a Palestinian journalist, which focused on Israel’s settlements in the West Bank. Both journalists also belong to the Israeli-Palestinian collective that produced the documentary “No Other Land” last year, which won an Oscar in 2025.

    Journalists wishing to apply for the 2025 prize may submit their application to presse.dcp at diplomatie.gouv.fr using this form, until midnight on 30 August 2025: download the form (Word – 37 Ko).

    The Prize is accompanied by a lump-sum of €10,000, which must be used to finance a project carried out by the prizewinner.

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Russia: NSU student finds out that water has a huge impact on the elastic properties of hydrogel

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: Novosibirsk State University –

    An important disclaimer is at the bottom of this article.

    The effect of water on the longitudinal gigahertz elastic modulus of collagen-based hydrogel was studied by a student of the Department of Physical Methods of Solid State Research using optical spectroscopy methods Faculty of Physics, Novosibirsk State University Anna Laktionova under the scientific supervision of Valeria Zykova, PhD in Physics and Mathematics, Senior Researcher at the Institute of Automation and Electrometry SB RAS. The data from this study became the basis for her master’s thesis, which she successfully defended this year. In her work, she used optical research methods – Mandelstam-Brillouin scattering (MBS) spectroscopy and Raman spectroscopy.

    — Changes in the elastic properties of biological objects may be associated with disruptions in the functioning of living cells, in such cases, information about the elastic modulus plays a key role. Currently, a contactless and non-invasive technique for characterizing the viscoelastic properties of materials is actively developing – Mandelstam-Brillouin scattering spectroscopy (MBS), which has proven itself in application to biomedical problems. MBS spectroscopy allows obtaining information about the speed of sound in a substance and the gigahertz elastic modulus. However, when studying real biotissues, difficulties arise in interpreting experimental data that are associated with the multicomponent composition of the studied objects and small changes in the elastic modulus due to pathologies occurring in the bioobject. This is due to the fact that the main contribution to the elastic modulus value in the case of real tissues is made by the water component, the content of which is quite high for the case of biological samples. For this reason, researchers often use simpler model two-component objects instead of real tissues, which are hydrogels, in particular, collagen-based hydrogels. By varying the water content, various parameters of viscoelastic properties are achieved, thereby hydrogels imitate the properties of a wide variety of real tissues, explained Anna Laktionova.

    Samples of collagen -based hydrogels with different water content were made for conducting research. Further, with the help of a number of optical techniques (RMB, cattle, low -frequency cattle and depolarized light scattering), Anna described the elastic and relaxation properties of manufactured hydrogels. Spectra measurement was made during drying of hydrogel samples in the air. This was done in order to observe how, depending on the content of water in the sample, its elastic properties are changed, determined from the parameters of the spectrum of light scattering. With the dehydration of the sample from the most hydrated state (water content of 99.5 %) to a completely dry elasticity module increases by 6 times. At the same time, significant growth is observed with protein concentrations above 60 %. For a detailed study of such behavior, two spectrometers were required to synchronously measure the spectra of RMB and CRC. In this regard, some difficulties arose. The devices were in different rooms, which could affect the accuracy of measurements: while the sample was transferred from one office to another, it could be subjected to undesirable exposure to external factors, which would lead to its additional drying. To characterize the content of water in the samples and their elastic module from the same point in the process of drying, participants in the experiment, which was conducted in the spectroscopy laboratory of the condensed media of the Institute of Automation and Electrometry of the SB RAS, established a fiber -fiber channel between two spectrometers. This technical solution was implemented for the first time in Russia.

    The analysis of the dependence of the Brillouin line position on the protein concentration in the hydrogel showed that the value of the gigahertz elastic modulus changes almost 6 times within the full range of concentrations (water content 0 – 100%). This is a very significant change. Earlier in the literature it was demonstrated that in the case of chemical treatments it is only a few percent. This fact fully demonstrates the strong influence of water. The resulting concentration dependence of the elastic modulus was described by a model considering the hydrogel as a rigid protein framework filled with water.

    — From the analysis of the shape of the Brillouin spectrum of hydrogels, a non-trivial dependence of the Brillouin line width on the protein content was obtained. It is generally accepted, at least for single-component systems, that the Brillouin line width characterizes the viscosity of the object under study. However, in our case, everything was not so simple. When the hydrogel dried, the Brillouin line width actually increased to protein concentrations of about 70%, where the dependence extremum was observed. With further dehydration, up to completely dry collagen, the Brillouin line width narrowed. According to our assumptions, the reason for such an unexpected result lies in the influence of relaxation processes on the shape of the Brillouin spectrum of the hydrogel. To confirm this hypothesis, it was necessary to conduct a study using another spectroscopic technique – depolarized light scattering spectroscopy, – said Anna Laktionova.

    A comprehensive comparison of the behavior of the RMB line width and the shape of the depolarized spectrum made it possible to verify the relaxation nature of the Brillouin line broadening with a change in water content. The results of RMB spectroscopy of hydrogels with different water contents for several temperatures (25, 0, -10 °C) additionally confirmed the influence of relaxation processes on the Brillouin line width, explained Anna Laktionova.

    The analysis of the obtained results allowed us to obtain complete information on the nature of the interaction of the biopolymer matrix with the water component and to study in detail the issue of the influence of the water component on the parameters of the Brillouin spectrum of a hydrogel with different degrees of hydration. The participants of the study came to the conclusion: the work done demonstrates the prospects of the complex application of spectroscopic techniques (RMB, Raman, low-frequency Raman and depolarized light scattering) for characterizing the properties of hydrogels and studying the issue of the interaction of water with the protein matrix.

    — It is very important to study the effect of water on the elastic properties of collagen-based hydrogel using optical methods, because such an object is simple enough to interpret spectral data, while it is capable of imitating the mechanical properties of more complex biological objects. This work, using such simple objects as an example, demonstrates the capabilities of optical spectroscopy methods, which in the future can be used to study more complex real tissues, — said Anna Laktionova.

    Material prepared by: Elena Panfilo, NSU press service

    Please note: This information is raw content obtained directly from the source of the information. It is an accurate report of what the source claims and does not necessarily reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    .

    MIL OSI Russia News –

  • MIL-OSI Submissions: Masked and armed agents are arresting people on US streets as aggressive immigration enforcement ramps up

    Source: The Conversation – UK – By Dafydd Townley, Teaching Fellow in US politics and international security, University of Portsmouth

    There are masked men, and some women, on the streets in American cities, sometimes travelling in unmarked cars, often carrying weapons and wearing military-style kit. They have the power to identify, arrest, detain non-citizens and deport undocumented immigrants. They also have the right to interrogate any individual who they believe is not a citizen over their right to remain in the US.

    These are agents from US Immigration and Customs Enforcement Agency, known as Ice. This is a federal law enforcement agency, which falls under the control of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), and is playing a significant and contentious role in the implementation of Donald Trump’s tough immigration policy.

    On the campaign trail Trump promised “the largest domestic deportation operation in American history”. And he is giving Ice more power to deliver his plans.

    Since Trump took office in January, Ice funding has been significantly increased. Trump’s “big beautiful bill”, passed by Congress in July 2025, gave Ice US$75 billion (£55 billion) of funding for the next four years, up from around US$8 billion a year.

    This funding boost will allow the agency to recruit more agents as well as adding thousands more beds plus extensions to buildings to increase the capacity of detention centres. There is also new funding for advanced surveillance tools including AI-assisted facial recognition and mobile data collection. There’s another US$30 billion going to frontline operations, covering removing immigrants and transport to detention centres.

    The president has committed to deporting everyone who is in the US illegally, that is estimated by the Wall Street Journal to be about 4% of the current US population. For the past five months, the numbers of people being picked up by Ice agents has been ticking up fast.

    Average daily arrests were up 268% to about 1,000 a day in June 2025, compared with the same month a year earlier. This was also a 42% rise on May 2025, according to data analysis from the Guardian and the Deportation Data Project. However, this is still considerably short of the 3,000 a day ordered by secretary of homeland security Kristi Noem and White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller.

    Ice’s tactics have already attracted significant criticism. Right-leaning broadcaster Fox News has reported on how masked agents are not showing ID or naming their agency when picking up people in raids. Other reporting has highlighted allegations that American citizens are also sometimes being swept up in the raids.

    The agency, currently led by acting director Todd M. Lyons, has three main divisions: the Enforcement and Removal Operations division, which identifies and deports undocumented immigrants as well as manages detention centres. The Homeland Security Investigations, which investigates criminal activities with an international or border nexus such as human trafficking, narcotics, and weapons smuggling. The Office of the Principal Legal Advisor provides legal advice to Ice and prosecutes immigration cases in court.

    Lyons claimed that mask wearing was necessary because of Ice agents being “doxed” – when a person’s personal information such as names and home addresses are revealed online without their permission. Assaults on Ice agents have risen, he claimed. DHS data suggested that there were 79 assaults on Ice agents from January to June 2025, compared to ten in the same period in 2024.

    Democratic House minority leader Hakeem Jeffries compared mask wearing by Ice agents to secret police forces in authoritarian regimes. “We’re not behind the Iron Curtain. This is not the 1930s.”



    Read more:
    ICE has broad power to detain and arrest noncitizens – but is still bound by constitutional limits

    The Ice agency was established in 2003 by the George W. Bush administration, partly as a result of the 9/11 terrorist attacks, and was part of a broader reorganisation of federal agencies under the then newly created DHS. It incorporated parts of the former Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) and some elements of the US Customs Service.

    According to the agency’s website, Ice’s core mission is “to protect America through criminal investigations and enforcing immigration laws to preserve national security and public safety”.

    News coverage of Ice agents wearing masks and not identifying themselves.

    What’s changed?

    At the start of the administration in January, the White House gave Ice the authority to hasten the deportation of immigrants that had entered the country with government authorisation during the previous administration. This “expedited removal” authority allowed Ice to deport individuals without requiring an appearance before an immigration judge.

    As arrests have grown in the past months, Lyons told CBS News that Ice would detain any undocumented immigrant, even if they did not have a criminal record.

    And the Trump administration has also allowed Ice agents to make arrests at immigration courts, which had previously been off limits. This restriction was introduced by the Biden administration in 2021 to ensure witnesses, victims of crimes and defendants would still appear in court without fear of arrest for immigration violations, unless the target was a national security threat.

    Protests over Ice raids have spread across California.

    However, Lyons rescinded those restrictions in May, part of a broader shift towards aggressive enforcement.

    Much of the time, Ice has targeted illegal immigrants. But the agency has also arrested and detained some individuals who were residents (green card holders) or tourists – and, in some cases, citizens.

    In recent weeks, according to the Washington Post, Ice has been ordered to increase the number of immigrants shackled with GPS-enabled ankle monitors. This would significantly increase the number of immigrants that are under surveillance. Ankle monitors also restrict where people can travel.

    Sparking protests

    There have been numerous public protests about Ice raids, most notably in California. This peaked on June 6 after Ice had conducted numerous raids in Los Angeles, resulting in clashes between agents and protesters. This led to the White House sending around 2,000 National Guard troops and 700 Marines to Los Angeles, despite opposition from California governor Gavin Newsom.

    Part of the friction between the Trump administation and the state is that Los Angeles and San Francisco have adopted local policies to limit cooperation with federal immigration authorities including Ice. California has sanctuary laws, such as SB 54, that prohibit local police and sheriffs from assisting Ice with civil immigration enforcement.

    However, Trump shows every sign of pushing harder and faster to crack down on illegal immigrants, and Ice agents are clearly at the forefront of how he aims to do it.

    Dafydd Townley does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    – ref. Masked and armed agents are arresting people on US streets as aggressive immigration enforcement ramps up – https://theconversation.com/masked-and-armed-agents-are-arresting-people-on-us-streets-as-aggressive-immigration-enforcement-ramps-up-261499

    MIL OSI –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Evidence of poor implementation of the Digital Services Act (DSA) by X and the Republic of Ireland – P-003074/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Priority question for written answer  P-003074/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Günther Sidl (S&D)

    The DSA came into force in February 2024; it lays down specific obligations for large online platforms to tackle illegal hate speech on the internet.

    However, as explained in the blog post ‘X ist ein rechtsfreier Raum’ (‘X is a legal vacuum’) by an Austrian journalist and television presenter, there are considerable doubts as to whether, in practice, the DSA is being implemented in accordance with the law[1]. For example, following a criminal complaint made in order to have a perpetrator of hate speech on X investigated, both Twitter International Unlimited Company in Dublin, which is responsible for processing data for X in the EU, and the Irish Department of Justice refused to comply with a Vienna Regional Criminal Court order to provide information. The Austrian courts have therefore been unable to investigate the perpetrator.

    • 1.Does the Commission regard it as permissible for an online platform to refuse to provide information to a Member State’s judicial authority on the ground that only requests under a bilateral mutual legal assistance agreement will be responded to?
    • 2.Does the Commission regard it as permissible for a Member State to refuse to provide assistance on the ground that it is competent only if the requested data are physically stored on its territory?
    • 3.Will the Commission take this case as an opportunity to look into whether X and the Republic of Ireland have breached their obligations under the DSA?

    Submitted: 24.7.2025

    • [1] https://www.arminwolf.at/2025/06/28/x-ist-ein-rechtsfreier-raum/
    Last updated: 31 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Secretary Noem is Taking a Sledgehammer to Criminal Human Trafficking Rings

    Source: US Federal Emergency Management Agency

    Headline: Secretary Noem is Taking a Sledgehammer to Criminal Human Trafficking Rings

    lass=”text-align-center”>On this World Day Against Trafficking in Persons, Kristi Noem and the Department of Homeland Security continue taking action to disrupt criminal human trafficking organizations
    WASHINGTON – On this year’s World Day Against Trafficking in Persons, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is announcing a series of major crack downs against the worst of the worst criminal organizations: human trafficking rings

     
    The previous administration’s open border policies empowered human traffickers and allowed over 450,000 unaccompanied children to be illegally smuggled over the border

     
    Under President Trump and DHS Secretary Kristi Noem, the full weight of the American government is bringing the hammer down on human trafficking rings

      In just the first few months, the Trump administration has developed leads on thousands of human trafficking cases

     
    DHS has also cracked down on the criminal terrorist gang Tren de Aragua, which enriches itself through the sex trafficking of vulnerable young women

      The Trump administration has arrested more than 2,700 members of Tren de Aragua so far

     
    This crisis is fueled by organized crime networks: sophisticated cartels that exploited the weakness of the previous administration, especially its open border and refusal to enforce immigration law, to rake in billions from forced labor, brutal sexual exploitation, coercing innocent people into drug running, and other heinous crimes

     
    “The brave men and women of DHS are the best in the world at going after traffickers

    They are always able to track down those who are trafficking individuals, find the ringleaders, and rip that evil off by its head,” said Secretary Kristi Noem

    “I’m so thankful that I get the chance to lead individuals like that, and agents who get up every day to help save our children and to save women and men from the kind of slavery that we’ve seen

    ” 
    Below are some examples of how DHS is fighting to put human traffickers out of business: 

    July 28, 2025: As part of Operation Apex Predator, a Child Exploitation Investigations Unit initiative with the Cyber Crimes Center, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Newark arrested four illegal alien child predators over the course of four days

    All four are registered sex offenders

    July 23, 2025: ICE arrested 243 illegal aliens in the Denver metro area

    Among those arrested were aliens wanted for human trafficking, and several members of transnational criminal organizations (TCOs), including Tren de Aragua (TdA), Los Zetas, and the Sinaloa Cartel

    July 22, 2025: Following an ICE Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) investigation, a resident of Laredo, Texas was sentenced to 63 months in prison for smuggling 101 migrants in a locked trailer

    Among the illegal aliens smuggled were 12 children

    The suspect was sentenced after pleading guilty to conspiracy to transport migrants

    July 21, 2025: As a result of an investigation by ICE HSI Rio Grande Valley, a convicted human smuggler was sentenced to 20 years in prison for possessing images of sexual assaults of prepubescent children

    July 10, 2025: ICE and Customs and Border Protection (CBP) executed criminal warrant operations at marijuana facilities in Carpinteria and Camarillo, California

    In these facilities, at least 14 migrant children were rescued from potential exploitation, forced labor, and human trafficking

    During this operation, federal officers also arrested at least 361 illegal aliens

    Among those arrested were criminals with convictions for kidnapping, rape, attempted rape, and attempted child molestation, among other charges

    July 10, 2025: As the result of an ICE New York investigation, the leader of a Mexican sex trafficking organization was sentenced to 188 months in prison for sex trafficking multiple victims by force, fraud, and coercion

    July 9, 2025: An ICE Del Rio investigation resulted in an illegal Honduran alien being sentenced to 10 years in prison, with three years of supervised release, for his role in smuggling thousands of aliens into the United States for financial gain

    His smuggling conspiracy spanned three years and involved thousands of aliens from 11 different countries

    July 7, 2025: Border Patrol agents assisted the U

    S

    Marshals in executing an arrest warrant on a high-priority target linked to a criminal syndicate operating in human exploitation

    The suspect, a U

    S

    citizen, was wanted for multiple charges, including procurement of persons, placing individuals into prostitution, residing in a house of prostitution, and profiting from the earnings of prostitution

    The suspect was arrested without incident in Yuma, Arizona

     
    June 24, 2025: HSI Nashville identified one child victim and one adult victim of labor trafficking

    During an immigration court proceeding, the child victim revealed that she and her 18-year-old brother had been forced by their sponsor to work to pay off their smuggling fees and to pay for the sponsor’s household expenses

    June 16, 2025: A worksite enforcement operation by ICE HSI targeted employers and subcontractors who knowingly hire illegal aliens

    During this operation, HSI Mobile identified and rescued a child and arrested eight foreign nationals for violating immigration law

    The child was found to be working among adults and was believed to have never attended school since entering the United States two years ago

    June 6, 2025: The Department of Justice (DOJ) indicted Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Venezuelan illegal alien and member of MS-13 arrested by ICE, on charges of alien smuggling and conspiracy to commit alien smuggling

    Despite the mainstream media insisting for months that Garcia was an innocent “Maryland father,” he is now standing trial after evidence emerged of his involvement in criminal smuggling rings

    June 2, 2025: ICE Rio Grande Valley discovered a stash house in South Texas and subsequently arrested 16 illegal aliens

    The owner of the property admitted to harboring the illegal aliens, who came from five different countries

    A Mexican national was taken in for questioning for his role in human smuggling

    May 28, 2025: HSI New York special agents arrested an adult male from Ecuador at his residence for violations relating to the sexual exploitation of a child

    New York received information regarding a 15-year-old female who was apprehended near El Paso, Texas, after illegally entering the United States

    At that time, she was pregnant with the adult’s child and had been in a relationship with him in Ecuador since the age of thirteen

    The subject organized the smuggling of the teenager across the border to engage in sexual acts

    His mother sponsored her after her illegal entry, and the subject continued his relationship with the children, living with his mother in Harlem

    May 28, 2025: CBP issued a Withhold Release Order against Zhen Fa 7, a Chinese-flagged fishing vessel

    As a result, CBP officers at all U

    S

    ports of entry will detain seafood harvested by Zhen Fa 7 based on reasonable suspicion that the vessel uses forced labor to harvest such seafood

    May 28, 2025: Border Patrol agents in the San Diego Sector prevented an attempt to smuggle two Mexican nationals into the United States

    The attempt involved one United States citizen and one Mexican national, who attempted to smuggle the illegal aliens across the border using a truck

    Inside the truck were three fully loaded firearms, including a “ghost gun

    ” The suspected smugglers face felony charges of bringing in and harboring aliens, and unlawful acts involving firearms

     
    May 12, 2025: HSI Austin identified and rescued a child, arrested two Guatemalan nationals for violating immigration law, and initiated an HSI-led investigation of state and federal charges of human trafficking and statutory rape

    During a welfare check, HSI Agents, assisted by the FBI, identified a pregnant 14-year-old female residing with an unrelated adult male sponsor, later determined to be the biological father of the unborn child

    May 7, 2025: CBP’s Air and Marine Operations (AMO) interdicted a vessel with four illegal aliens from Uzbekistan that were being smuggled into Puerto Rico

    The vessel attempted to enter Puerto Rico on the island of Vieques; onboard were the four illegal aliens from Uzbekistan and three United States citizens

    The Uzbeki nationals did not have any documents for an authorized entry or stay in the United States

    May 4, 2025: Border Patrol agents in the Tucson Sector arrested a United States citizen and two Mexican nationals after a high-speed pursuit

    The United States citizen, who was driving the car and had an extensive criminal history, fled from law enforcement at high speed after failing to stop at an immigration checkpoint

    After crashing into another car, the three occupants fled on foot before being arrested

    The driver faces federal charges that include human smuggling, fleeing law enforcement, and endangering human life

    May 2, 2025: Four Mexican nationals in the United States illegally were charged for their roles in an international human smuggling conspiracy that brought aliens across the Canadian border into the United States for profit

    The smuggling organization had been operating for two years and smuggled hundreds of aliens per week through Canada

    The aliens or their family members would pay thousands of dollars to be smuggled into the United States

    April 29, 2025: CBP officers at the Area Port of San Luis arrested a woman in connection with the failed smuggling attempt of a child

    The suspect, a Mexican citizen, had sedated the child prior to attempting to cross the border

    The suspect also presented a false birth certificate and alleged that she was the mother; the officers discovered that there was no family relationship between the woman and the child

    April 2, 2025: CBP issued a Withhold Release Order against Taepyung Salt Farm, based on information that reasonably indicates the use of forced labor in the production of the company’s sea salt products

    As a result, CBP personnel at all U

    S

    ports of entry will detain sea salt products from Taepyung Salt Farm in South Korea

    March 25, 2025: After an ICE Arizona investigation with law enforcement partners, a human smuggling coordinator was sentenced to 30 months in prison for her role in smuggling over 100 Colombians into the United States

    She had been operating a travel agency in her native country, Colombia, where she would charge the victims a fee to travel to Mexico, with additional bribes required at Mexican airports

    February 14, 2025: Working with the Tennessee Bureau of Investigation, an ICE investigation led to a four-count indictment against eight defendants with ties to Tren de Aragua on charges related to their involvement with a transnational commercial sex enterprise

    Everyone can be part of the fight against human trafficking

    The DHS Blue Campaign can help you recognize human trafficking and provide resources to report suspicious activity to law enforcement

     
    ###

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Governor Newsom signs legislation 7.30.25

    Source: US State of California 2

    Jul 30, 2025

    SACRAMENTO – Governor Gavin Newsom today announced that he has signed the following bills:

    • AB 17 by Assemblymember Juan Alanis (R-Modesto) – Elections: precinct maps.
    • AB 377 by Assemblymember David Tangipa (R-Clovis) – High-Speed Rail Authority: business plan: Merced to Bakersfield segment. A signing message can be found here.
    • AB 379 by Assemblymember Nick Schultz (D-Burbank) – Crimes: prostitution.
    • AB 642 by Assemblymember Al Muratsuchi (D-Torrance) – Emergencies proclaimed by the Governor: school employee catastrophic leave.
    • AB 951 by Assemblymember Tri Ta (R-Westminster) – Health care coverage: behavioral diagnoses.
    • AB 1029 by Assemblymember Avelino Valencia (D-Anaheim) – Statements of financial interest: digital financial assets.
    • AB 1051 by Assemblymember Laurie Davies (R-Laguna Niguel) – Route 76: Payómkawish Highway.
    • AB 1114 by Assemblymember Anamarie Ávila Farías (D-Martinez) – Emergency vehicles: fee and toll exemptions.
    • AB 1216 by the Committee on Education – Elementary and secondary education: omnibus.
    • AB 1459 by the Committee on Environmental Safety and Toxic Materials – Hazardous waste: underground storage tanks.
    • SB 251 by Senator Anna Caballero (D-Merced) – Claims against the state: appropriation.
    • SB 428 by Senator John Laird (D-Santa Cruz) – State Auditor: permanent office.
    • SB 521 by Senator Lena Gonzalez (D-Long Beach) – Public employment: disqualification.
    • SB 648 by Senator Lola Smallwood-Cuevas (D-Los Angeles) – Employment: gratitudes: enforcement.
    • SB 652 by Senator Laura Richardson (D-South Bay) – Private security services: security guards: training.
    • SB 693 by Senator Dave Cortese (D-Silicon Valley) – Employees: meal periods.

    For full text of the bills, visit: http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov.

    Press releases, Recent news

    Recent news

    Jul 30, 2025

    News What you need to know: California is standing up for all Americans by challenging Trump’s unlawful tariff policy, which is slowing the national economy and raising prices for consumers.  SACRAMENTO – Governor Gavin Newsom today filed an amicus brief in support of…

    Jul 30, 2025

    News What you need to know: California is taking targeted action to address the mental health crisis among young men and boys today with a new executive order focused on suicide prevention, behavioral health, and helping find purpose through education, family, and…

    Jul 29, 2025

    News SACRAMENTO – Governor Gavin Newsom today announced the following appointments:Gerald Tolbert, of La Jolla, has been appointed to the Medical Board of California. Tolbert has been a Clinical Assistant Professor at the Department of Emergency Medicine and Medical…

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Counter-drone efforts rise as prison sightings revealed

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    Press release

    Counter-drone efforts rise as prison sightings revealed

    Organised crime gangs are being targeted by the police and prison service as part of a nationwide crackdown on drone drops into prisons.

    • Prison Service working with police to tackle threat of drones as part of Plan for Change
    • Drone incidents up by 43 per cent in the last financial year, new data reveals
    • Two recent counter-drone operations result in nine arrests

    The move is backed by a new investment of £900,000 and designed to disrupt the in-flow of drugs and weapons that are destabilising prisons and putting staff and offenders at risk. 

    It builds on the £40 million already invested this year into prison security measures, including exterior netting and reinforced windows. Stopping the flow of drugs and weapons getting into prisons is a crucial step in gripping the prisons crisis the Government inherited to make streets safer, as part of the Plan for Change. 

    The news comes as data published today (31 July) reveals there were 1,712 drone incidents between April 2024 and March 2025 at prisons across England and Wales. This is an increase of 43 per cent compared to the previous 12 months.

    The clampdown has already seen counter-drone operations at HMPs Manchester and Wandsworth leading to the swift arrest of nine individuals. Similar operations are planned in the coming months.

    Minister for Prisons, Probation and Reducing Reoffending, Lord Timpson, said: 

    The ease with which drones were operating over prisons was yet another sign of the chaotic prison system we inherited last July.

    As part of the Plan for Change, we are tackling the organised crime gangs behind the drug supply routes so that our prisons can start cutting crime and stop creating better criminals.

    One of the sophisticated drones recovered in the HMP Wandsworth operation had a value of £6,000, an extended flight time of 40 minutes and the ability to hold four loads at one time. 

    Four further arrests were made by West Mercia Police earlier this month for flying drones over high-security prison HMP Long Lartin. 

    Detective Superintendent of the North West Regional Organised Crime Unit, Claire McGuire said: 

    Tackling the use of drones to smuggle drugs, weapons, and other illicit items into prisons is one of our top priorities. These activities fuel organised crime and pose serious risks to both staff and inmates. 

    We continue to work closely with national partners including His Majesty’s Prisons and Probation Service, the National Crime Agency, local police forces, and intelligence teams to disrupt this criminal behaviour and prevent contraband from entering prison estates. By sharing intelligence and coordinating operations, we are strengthening our collective response to this growing threat. 

    The latest Safety in Custody statistics, also published today, highlight the alarming levels of violence across the prison estate, with 20,570 prisoner-on-prisoner assaults and 10,568 assaults on staff in the 12 months to March 2025. Reducing the availability of contraband in prisons plays a key role in reducing violence across the estate.

    Earlier this week, a trial into the use of tasers began across adult male prisons in England and Wales – the first time their use is being trialled in the prison estate. The Lord Chancellor, Shabana Mahmood, has also announced the rollout of protective body armour for those staff working in prison settings holding the most dangerous offenders.  

    Further information: 

    • Drone incidents data is available in the HMPPS Annual Digest
    • Latest Safety in Custody statistics are available here

    Updates to this page

    Published 31 July 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom –

  • MIL-OSI Russia: Ten-Year-Old Django: Polytechnic Students Celebrate Anniversary Work Season

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University –

    An important disclaimer is at the bottom of this article.

    The Polytechnic student teams are back in touch. Today we will go to Crimea together with the agricultural team “Django”. By the way, this is already the tenth working season for our “farmers”.

    The guys celebrated their anniversary at the vineyards of the Massandra company in the village of Malorechenskoye, in the southern part of the peninsula. Many nostalgic memories are associated with this place, because the team is coming here for the third time, everything here has become native and close.

    At work, polytechnicians master the profession of a winegrower: they tie up vines, water and collect ripe bunches of grapes, and look after young vineyards. And in their free time, they explore the surrounding area, visit nearby cities, conquer the Crimean mountains, swim in the sea and organize unforgettable events.

    “What are my feelings about the season? The most diverse! Each new day brings an unusually large number of emotions and impressions, something is constantly happening around – it overwhelms, even confuses from being unaccustomed to it,” shared her impressions of her first trip, “Django” candidate Dasha Shcherbinina. “It seems that I live some new, completely unreal life. And in this life – sun, sea, mountains and endless vineyards!”

    Please note: This information is raw content obtained directly from the source of the information. It is an accurate report of what the source claims and does not necessarily reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    .

    MIL OSI Russia News –

  • MIL-OSI Security: Appeal to trace woman and newborn baby missing from Walthamstow

    Source: United Kingdom London Metropolitan Police

    Police are appealing for information after a woman is reported to have given birth to a baby before going missing.

    Shortly before 16:45hrs on Wednesday, 30 July a report was made to the police that a woman had given birth that same day at about 08:00hrs at the Billet Road underpass, Walthamstow.

    A witnesses was alerted when she heard sounds of distress in the underpass. She aided with the birth and stayed with the woman until about 16:00hrs when the mother and the newborn were picked-up by two people in a blue transit van.

    The woman is believed to be rough sleeping, white, in her mid-30s, with long blonde hair. She was wearing a black dress and heavy jumper and is believed to go by the name Anne Marie.

    Officers are extremely concerned for the welfare of her and her baby.

    PC Dan Cooper, from the North East area’s Local Missing Hub, said: “Our top priority is to establish that the woman and her baby are safe and well and have access to any medical treatment they may need. I would like to stress that the woman is not in any trouble, our only concern is the wellbeing of her and her newborn child.

    “We are carrying out fast-paced enquiries, including trawling CCTV, speaking to people in the area and visiting nearby hospitals.

    “I’d also like to appeal to anyone who was in the area at the time and may have seen or heard something to come forward. Were you walking or cycling through the underpass or at the nearby Kwik Fit garage? If so, please get in touch with us.

    “If the woman does not feel comfortable speaking to us, she can go directly to a medical centre or a charity.”

    Anyone with information is asked to call the North East area’s Local Missing Hub on 07881 330 956 or 101 quoting CAD 5617/30JUL.

    Alternatively, you can contact the independent charity Crimestoppers anonymously on 0800 555 111 or visit crimestoppers-uk.org.

    MIL Security OSI –

  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: ‘Space oil drug’ renamed etomidate

    Source: Hong Kong Information Services

    The “space oil drug” has officially been renamed as etomidate to help promote anti-drug messages, Secretary for Security Tang Ping-keung said today.
     
    Mr Tang made the announcement when he spoke to the media this afternoon after attending the Fight Crime Committee meeting and explained the reason behind giving the dangerous drug a new name.
     
    “When we look at the increase in drug offences, for the first half of 2025 we have 591 cases of serious drug offences. Among those drug (cases), one-fourth of them is relating to etomidate.
     
    “Previously we called it ‘space oil drug’, and some of the drug traffickers make use of the name to promote a sort of fantasy and some positive feelings after taking drugs. I think this is absolutely wrong.
     
    “Etomidate only brings you harm. It will make you behave abnormally, and will cause (defacement) in your appearance, such as losing hair. I think we have to properly name it as etomidate.”

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News –

  • MIL-OSI Security: Four Members and Associates of Paterson Based Gang Known as “4K” Indicted for Violent Crime in Aid of Racketeering for their Role in a Shooting

    Source: United States Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco Firearms and Explosives (ATF)

    NEWARK, N.J. – Four members of the Paterson based neighborhood street gang known as “4K” were indicted for their roles in a shooting, Acting U.S. Attorney Alina Habba announced.

    The Superseding Indictment charges Jatrail Avent, a/k/a “Curry” (“Avent”); Shequan Roberts, a/k/a “Shingy” (“Roberts”); Jahmir Moody, a/k/a “Jahdi” (“Moody”); and Wizair Johnson, a/k/a “Wababy” (“Johnson”), all of Paterson with one count of committing a violent crime in aid of racketeering activity and one count of discharging a firearm during a crime of violence. The Superseding Indictment also incorporates individual firearms charges, which were previously charged in the Indictment.

    These charges are the result of a long-running investigation coordinated between the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, and the Passaic County Sheriff’s Office, among other law enforcement agencies.

    According to documents filed in this case and statements made in court:

    Avent, Roberts, Moody, and Johnson are all members and associates of the neighborhood based street gang known as “4K,” which operates in the area of Rosa Parks Boulevard near Lyon Street, Keen Street, and Mercer Streets in Paterson, New Jersey (the “4K Enterprise”).  These members and associates of the 4K Enterprise have engaged in numerous criminal acts in furtherance of their gang, including shootings, robberies, homicides, and drug trafficking. Members and associates of the 4K Enterprise have engaged in acts of violence against members of rival gangs.

    On or about November 6, 2022, Avent, Roberts, Moody, and Johnson opened fire on members of a rival gang, called the 230 Boyz, who were inside a van, as part of a dispute between 4K and the 230 Boyz.

    The defendants face a maximum sentence of 20 years in prison on the violent crime in aid of racketeering charge, and a statutory mandatory minimum sentence of 10 years in prison and a maximum sentence of life in prison on the firearm offense, which must run consecutively to any other sentence imposed. Both offenses carry a maximum fine of $250,000.

    Acting U.S. Attorney Habba credited law enforcement members with the Federal Bureau of Investigation, under the direction of Special Agent in Charge Stefanie Roddy, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, Newark Field Division, under the direction of Special Agent in Charge L.C. Cheeks, Jr.; the New Jersey State Police, Gangs and Organized Crime North Unit, under the direction of Col. Patrick J. Callahan; the Passaic County Sheriff’s Office, under the direction of Sheriff Thomas Adamo; the Paterson Police Department, under the direction of Officer In Charge Patrick Murray, with the investigation leading to yesterday’s charges.

    This case is part of the Paterson Violent Crime Initiative (VCI), which was formed in 2020 by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of New Jersey, the Passaic County Prosecutor’s Office, and the City of Paterson’s Department of Public Safety for the purpose of combatting violent crime in and around Paterson. As part of this partnership, federal, state, county, and city agencies collaborate and pool resources to prosecute violent offenders who endanger the safety of the community. The VCI is composed of the U.S. Attorney’s Office, the FBI, the ATF, the Drug Enforcement Administration, the U.S. Marshals, the Paterson Department of Public Safety, the Paterson Police Department, the Passaic County Prosecutor’s Office, the Passaic County Sheriff’s Office, N.J. State Parole, Bergen County Jail, N.J. State Police Regional Operations and Intelligence Center/Real Time Crime Center, and N.J. Department of Corrections.

    The government is represented by Assistant U.S. Attorney Rebecca Sussman and Dan Rosenblum of the U.S Attorney’s Office Narcotics/OCDETF Unit in Newark.

    The charges and allegations contained in the Superseding Indictment are merely accusations, and the defendants are presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.

                                                               ###

    Defense counsel:

    Jatrail Avent – Michael T Simon

    Shequan Roberts – Richard J. Verde

    Jahmir Moody – Ernesto Cerimele

    Wizair Johnson – Mary Toscano 

    MIL Security OSI –