Category: DJF

  • MIL-OSI USA: Statement from Governor Josh Stein on the U.S. House Passage of the Senate Reconciliation Bill

    Source: US State of North Carolina

    Headline: Statement from Governor Josh Stein on the U.S. House Passage of the Senate Reconciliation Bill

    Statement from Governor Josh Stein on the U.S. House Passage of the Senate Reconciliation Bill
    lsaito

    Raleigh, NC

    Today Governor Josh Stein released the following statement on the U.S. House’s passage of the Senate reconciliation bill:  

    “Congress and the White House are charging forward with a bill that will have devastating consequences for the people and economy in North Carolina, while also significantly increasing the national debt to pay for tax breaks for the wealthiest among us. More than half a million people stand to lose their health care, tens of thousands working in clean energy and manufacturing could lose their jobs, electricity bills could rise nearly 20 percent, and 1.4 million people – including 600,000 children – could find themselves without the help they need to afford food. The bill is a disgrace, and I am disappointed in those who did not stand up for the people they serve, choosing instead to ignore warnings from local leaders and groups across the state who have sounded the alarm about the dangers in this bill.   

    “We cannot simply accept these harmful impacts. The General Assembly must step up to protect our bipartisan Medicaid expansion law and food assistance through SNAP. This will require taking a hard look at our laws, our state budget, and our long-term revenue requirements. Even as those in Washington have left North Carolinians behind, I stand ready to do whatever I can to protect people’s health care and jobs and keep children fed and healthy. We can and must do better.” 

    Read more about the impacts in North Carolina. 
     

    Jul 3, 2025

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Secretary Dev Sangvai Releases Statement on the U.S. House Passage of the Senate Reconciliation Bill

    Source: US State of North Carolina

    Headline: Secretary Dev Sangvai Releases Statement on the U.S. House Passage of the Senate Reconciliation Bill

    Secretary Dev Sangvai Releases Statement on the U.S. House Passage of the Senate Reconciliation Bill
    hejones1

    Today, the U.S. House passed the Senate reconciliation bill. The bill includes significant changes to federal funding for Medicaid, the Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program (SNAP) and other public health and social support programs. The North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services is reviewing the final legislation to determine its full impact on the state and its residents. NCDHHS will provide additional information as more details become available and will remain focused on serving the people of North Carolina.  

    In response to the bill’s passage, NC Health and Human Services Secretary Dev Sangvai released the following statement regarding the impact of the legislation on North Carolinians. 

    “Today’s passage marks a significant moment with real consequences for North Carolina. While the full impact will become clearer in the coming weeks, we already know that it will result in billions of dollars being taken out of our state’s economy and will undermine the health of North Carolinians.  

    This bill includes major changes to Medicaid and SNAP – programs that provide vital support to millions of North Carolinians. There will be a significant reduction in federal funding for services that are core to the well-being of individuals and families across North Carolina. These cuts not only impact the people that rely on them directly but also strain the systems and communities that hold us all together.  

    The mission of the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services remains unchanged – we will continue to work to improve the health and well-being of all North Carolinians. This moment presents real challenges, and while our ability to offset these losses may be limited, our resolve is not. We will continue this work with determination, and compassion and a focus on the people we serve.”

    Jul 3, 2025

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: California Department of Justice Releases Legal Opinion on Daily Fantasy Sports

    Source: US State of California

    Thursday, July 3, 2025

    Contact: (916) 210-6000, agpressoffice@doj.ca.gov

    As required by law, the California Department of Justice must release legal opinions on qualifying issues when requested by members of the legislature

    OAKLAND – The California Department of Justice today released its legal opinion on daily fantasy sports. As required by Government Code section 12519, the Department must release formal legal opinions on qualifying issues when requested by a member of the legislature. This opinion was requested by Assemblymember Tom Lackey. In issuing this legal opinion, the Department was tasked with describing existing law. The Department doesn’t have the authority to make new law or change the law – only the Legislature and the voters of California can decide whether to change the law. 

    A link to the legal opinion is available here. 

    # # #

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – NGO funding through the LIFE programme – E-002493/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002493/2025/rev.1
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Christine Singer (Renew), Joachim Streit (Renew), Engin Eroglu (Renew), Filip Turek (PfE), Georgiana Teodorescu (ECR), Malika Sorel (NI), Ondřej Krutílek (ECR), Fernand Kartheiser (NI), Petr Bystron (ESN), Roman Haider (PfE), Friedrich Pürner (NI), Petar Volgin (ESN), Nicolas Bay (ECR), Jan-Peter Warnke (NI), António Tânger Corrêa (PfE), Michael McNamara (Renew), François-Xavier Bellamy (PPE), Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă (NI), Miriam Lexmann (PPE), Alexandr Vondra (ECR), Ciaran Mullooly (Renew), Mariusz Kamiński (ECR), Sander Smit (PPE), Céline Imart (PPE), Sebastian Tynkkynen (ECR), Katarína Roth Neveďalová (NI), Vasile Dîncu (S&D), Laurence Trochu (ECR), Marion Maréchal (ECR), Mathilde Androuët (PfE), René Aust (ESN), Hans Neuhoff (ESN), Jana Nagyová (PfE), Rada Laykova (ESN)

    Given the recent reports about work programmes, allegedly coordinated by the Commission and non-governmental organisations (NGOs), which include political activities such as combating coal-fired power plants and free trade agreements, we request answers to the following questions:

    • 1.To what extent are the work programmes submitted by funded NGOs made publicly accessible to enable independent review and oversight by the public and the relevant supervisory authorities?
    • 2.What steps does the Commission plan to take to reform the awarding practices of the LIFE programme to avoid potential conflicts of interest and ensure the independence of the NGOs funded?

    We would appreciate a swift response on this issue.

    Submitted: 20.6.2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Horrific terrorist attack on the Greek Orthodox Church in Damascus – P-002561/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Priority question for written answer  P-002561/2025/rev.1
    to the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy
    Rule 144
    Elissavet Vozemberg-Vrionidi (PPE), Georgios Aftias (PPE), Vangelis Meimarakis (PPE), Fredis Beleris (PPE), Eleonora Meleti (PPE), Emmanouil Kefalogiannis (PPE), Dimitris Tsiodras (PPE)

    On Sunday 22 June 2025, at least 22 people were killed and 63 injured in a terrorist attack on the Greek Orthodox church of the Prophet Elias in the outskirts of Damascus, when a suicide bomber opened fire and set off an explosive device in the presence of 350 worshippers. The 8th century church – considered to be one of the most important for the Greek Orthodox community in Damascus, a place of social gatherings on Sundays and religious festivities – suffered extensive damage.

    Although no organisation has claimed responsibility so far, the spokesperson of the Syrian Ministry of Interior, Noureddine al-Baba, said at a press conference that the preliminary investigation showed the extremist organisation Islamic State to be responsible. This is the first terrorist attack in Syria since al-Assad fell from power, which raises concerns about the safety of religious minorities in the region and intensifies the need for effective protection of civilians and vulnerable communities in post-war Syria under the new transitional government.

    Given the extremely worrying international geopolitical situation in the Middle East and following the massacres of religious minorities carried out by the new Syrian regime last March, can the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy say:

    • 1.Does she intend to react promptly by condemning the horrific terrorist suicide bomb attack on the Greek Orthodox Church of the Prophet Elias?
    • 2.What measures could she take to help guarantee the protection and safety of Christian populations in Syria and of the Christian monuments of Orthodox Christianity in the Middle East?

    Submitted: 25.6.2025

    Last updated: 3 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Actions on regulating third-party election campaigning and financing – E-002462/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002462/2025/rev.1
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Arkadiusz Mularczyk (ECR), Kosma Złotowski (ECR), Tomasz Froelich (ESN), Michał Dworczyk (ECR), Alexander Jungbluth (ESN), Małgorzata Gosiewska (ECR), Branko Grims (PPE), Anna Zalewska (ECR), Volker Schnurrbusch (ESN), Daniel Obajtek (ECR), Georgiana Teodorescu (ECR), Petr Bystron (ESN), Jacek Ozdoba (ECR), Marlena Maląg (ECR), Patryk Jaki (ECR), Tobiasz Bocheński (ECR), Joachim Stanisław Brudziński (ECR), Waldemar Buda (ECR), Jadwiga Wiśniewska (ECR), Bogdan Rzońca (ECR), Adam Bielan (ECR), Piotr Müller (ECR), András László (PfE)

    The Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe / Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (OSCE/ODIHR) report on Poland’s election campaign highlights unregulated third-party activities. Akcja Demokracja funded 600 digital billboards and ads on Meta and Google. The Committee for the Defence of Democracy rented a train and buses for a Rafał Trzaskowski support rally (25 May 2025). Fat Frogs Media spent PLN 131 000 on Google ads. Spontaniczny Sztab Obywatelski promoted Trzaskowski, denigrating Karol Nawrocki. Wiesz Jak Nie Jest paid PLN 321 484 for 104 ads, Stół Dorosłych – PLN 165 958 for 32, and ‘Wybierzmy Przyszłość’ – PLN 804 000 from 24 April to 28 May 2025.

    The ODIHR notes that the lack of regulation over third-party campaigns breaches international standards and recommendations. These entities, including civic organisations, supported Trzaskowski, incurring significant costs.

    • 1.What steps could the Commission take to regulate third-party campaigns in line with ODIHR recommendations?
    • 2.Will the Commission investigate the matter on its own initiative?
    • 3.How will the Commission support Member States in ensuring fair elections?

    Submitted: 18.6.2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Physical aggression towards an EU diplomat in Russia and protection measures for EU personnel – E-002471/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002471/2025/rev.1
    to the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy
    Rule 144
    Victor Negrescu (S&D)

    According to information in the international media which has been confirmed by the Commission’s spokesperson, an employee of the Delegation of the EU to the Russian Federation was physically attacked in Vladivostok at the end of May 2025 during an official mission. According to diplomatic sources, the attack was carried out by persons associated, or suspected of being affiliated, with the Russian security services.

    This unprecedentedly serious incident is an unacceptable escalation of the systematic harassment to which European diplomats are subjected in the Russian Federation. This act not only constitutes a flagrant breach of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, but also endangers the safety of European diplomats and directly affects the EU’s ability to maintain a minimal level of institutional dialogue with Russia.

    • 1.What concrete measures have been taken to protect the Romanian diplomat, or are being planned to guarantee the safety of EU diplomats in Russia and other high-risk regions?
    • 2.What official steps have been taken vis-à-vis the Russian authorities in the wake of this serious incident, and what have been the outcomes of the discussions with Russia?
    • 3.Is the European Union prepared to reassess the level of its diplomatic presence in Russia and take firm action, including sanctions, if no credible guarantees of respect for the status of EU personnel are given?

    Submitted: 18.6.2025

    Last updated: 3 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Highlights – Exchange of views on the foreign policy priorities of the Danish Presidency – Committee on Foreign Affairs

    Source: European Parliament

    Danish Presidency_AFET 15 July 2025.jpg © Media Gallery – Danish Presidency

    On Tuesday, 15 July 2025 in Brussels (room Antall 2Q2), the Committee on Foreign Affairs (AFET) will discuss the priorities of the Danish Presidency of the Council of the European Union (July-December 2025) with Marie Bjerre, Danish Minister for European Affairs.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Report on the Muslim Brotherhood – E-002563/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002563/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Sophie Wilmès (Renew), Benoit Cassart (Renew), Urmas Paet (Renew), Olivier Chastel (Renew), Malik Azmani (Renew), Karin Karlsbro (Renew), Sandro Gozi (Renew), Hilde Vautmans (Renew), Lucia Yar (Renew), Nathalie Loiseau (Renew), João Cotrim De Figueiredo (Renew), Petras Auštrevičius (Renew)

    On 21 May 2025, a report requested by the French government entitled ‘The Muslim Brotherhood and Political Islamism in France’ was released.

    Described as ‘damning’ by the French Minister of the Interior, the report highlights the threats posed by the Muslim Brotherhood in France, but also in Europe. Indeed, its influence is exerted through a network of organisations that are often located in close proximity to European institutions, to the point of becoming ‘regular interlocutors’. The report thus highlights a coordinated strategy of foreign interference through digital platforms, calling for increased vigilance to preserve democratic values in Europe. The creation of the ‘Special committee on the European Democracy Shield’ within the European Parliament was precisely intended to address the EU’s shortcomings in the area of malicious interference.

    In this context:

    • 1.How will the Democratic Shield address the threats mentioned in this report?
    • 2.How does the Commission intend to engage in dialogue with the non-EU countries mentioned in relation to their alleged influence in Europe?
    • 3.What tools already exist to counter this foreign interference? Has an assessment been carried out on the implementation and effectiveness of Regulation (EU) 2021/784 on combating the dissemination of terrorist content online?

    Submitted: 25.6.2025

    Last updated: 3 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – The recent annulment of the presidential election in Romania – E-000147/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    Democracy is a founding value of the EU. The essence of democracy is that citizens can freely express their views and participate in democratic life, choose their political representatives, and have a say in their future.

    Freedom of expression and freedom of information are both enshrined in the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights[1] and respected across EU legislation.

    EU law and policies do not aim to regulate the content of messages. On the contrary, they promote transparent access to an open democratic space.

    As long as legal boundaries are respected (such as respect for hate speech prohibitions and national defamation rules), citizens and political actors should be able to express themselves freely.

    Citizens have a right to seek and receive information and should be able to form their own opinions in a public space where a plurality of views can be expressed, where they have a right to disagree and where they can take part in elections which are free from interference, whether foreign or domestic.

    Foreign interference in the context of elections and democratic debate happens when a foreign state or foreign actor undertakes or triggers a covert operation, directly or through proxies, which aims to harm the integrity of the democratic debate, institutions or processes.

    • [1] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A12016P%2FTXT.
    Last updated: 3 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Security: DOJ/FTC Host Listening Session on Lowering Americans’ Drug Prices Through Competition

    Source: United States Attorneys General 7

    “…I know that these topics touch many other people and businesses in America, and we want to hear from you because we work for you at the end of the day. If you have concerns about specific anti-competitive practices, please reach out to the DOJ and FTC directly or through the healthy competition complaint center: HealthyCompetition.gov”

    -Assistant Attorney General for Antitrust Abigail Slater

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Europe: MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on preserving the memory of the victims of the post-war communist period in Slovenia – B10-0322/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    B10‑0322/2025

    European Parliament resolution on preserving the memory of the victims of the post-war communist period in Slovenia

    (2025/2575(RSP))

    The European Parliament,

     having regard to the Treaty on European Union, particularly Article 2 thereof, which upholds respect for human dignity, freedom, democracy, equality and human rights,

     having regard to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and related United Nations resolutions,

     having regard to Resolution 1481 of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe of 26 January 2006 on the need for international condemnation of crimes of totalitarian communist regimes,

     having regard to the Prague Declaration on European Conscience and Communism of 3 June 2008, which calls for Europe-wide condemnation of, and education about, the crimes of communism,

     having regard to its declaration of 23 September 2008 on the proclamation of 23 August as European Day of Remembrance for Victims of Stalinism and Nazism[1],

     having regard to the Vilnius Declaration of the OSCE of July 2009 condemning totalitarianism and supporting the European Day of Remembrance for Victims of Stalinism and Nazism,

     having regard to its resolution of 2 April 2009 on European conscience and totalitarianism[2],

     having regard to the Commission report of 22 December 2010 entitled ‘The memory of the crimes committed by totalitarian regimes in Europe’ (COM(2010)0783),

     having regard to its resolution of 19 September 2019 on the importance of European remembrance for the future of Europe[3],

     having regard to its resolution of 17 January 2024 on European historical consciousness[4],

     having regard to Petition No 0718/2023,

     having regard to Rule 233(2) of its Rules of Procedure,

    A. whereas European history, in all its complexity, should be respected and addressed through an objective, inclusive and evidence-based dialogue that promotes understanding and reconciliation and that should be conducted by professional historians and not be subject to political influence;

    B. whereas preserving the memory of Europe’s tragic past and remembering all victims of totalitarian and authoritarian regimes is essential for honouring the dignity of those victims, promoting reconciliation, human rights and the rule of law, and fostering a culture of peace and mutual respect;

    C. whereas Parliament has adopted a resolution on European consciousness and totalitarianism and has always been committed to preserving the memory of victims of all totalitarian regimes;

    D. whereas the crimes committed during the Second World War in Slovenia and other republics of the former Yugoslavia must never be forgotten;

    E. whereas in the aftermath of the Second World War, more than 100 000 Slovenian residents who resisted the communist system and its ideological repression were victims of violence in various forms; whereas these acts constituted serious violations of fundamental human rights, including the right to life, a fair trial and a decent burial;

    F. whereas tens of thousands of civilians and prisoners of war were extrajudicially executed by the Yugoslav communist regime in Slovenia; whereas in 1945 alone, thousands were executed right after the end of the war;

    G. whereas the Slovenian Government Commission on Concealed Mass Graves has identified over 750 locations of hidden gravesites, revealing a systematic effort to conceal these crimes, yet the places of execution have not been located and the victims have not been properly buried;

    H. whereas mass graves were covered up for decades and public discussion of these crimes was strictly prohibited under the totalitarian regime, thus burying historical truth and hindering the process of reconciliation;

    I. whereas the Slovenian Government abolished the National Day of Remembrance for victims of communist violence in 2023, which represents a serious backward step in efforts to ensure historical justice, reconciliation and respect for victims;

    J. whereas European history should be remembered and discussed objectively, and whereas the victims of the communist massacres in Slovenia therefore deserve remembrance and respect; whereas respect for the historical memory of the victims of all totalitarian regimes contributes to the building of a just and democratic society;

    K. whereas the Slovenian National Assembly passed a law in December 2024 banning the use of symbols of Nazism, fascism and their collaborationist organisations from the Second World War, but not the symbols of communism;

    L. whereas forced labour camps existed in all former Yugoslav republics; whereas these camps were used by the totalitarian communist regime in the country as a tool for suppressing all political opposition;

    1. Takes the view that the memory of crimes committed by totalitarian regimes should form part of the collective memory that makes up modern European history; acknowledges the crimes committed by Nazi, fascist and communist totalitarian regimes and the role these crimes have played in shaping historical perceptions in Europe;

    2. Underlines the importance of including historical facts in educational programmes and history textbooks to ensure that young people understand the importance of democracy and human rights;

    3. Reaffirms its condemnation of all forms of totalitarianism and authoritarianism, including communism, in line with its previous resolutions on historical memory and human rights;

    4. Reaffirms that crimes against humanity have no statute of limitations and should all be judged and handled against the same scale; reaffirms its unequivocal condemnation of historical revisionism and the glorification of Nazi collaborators and other wartime actors responsible for atrocities during and after the Second World War, including the trivialisation of crimes perpetrated by the Nazi and Fascist regimes and their allies, as well as the actions of collaborationist forces and the Yugoslav communist authorities; reiterates the importance of accurate and inclusive historical remembrance that recognises the full scale of totalitarian violence; emphasises the moral responsibility to preserve the memory of all innocent victims of totalitarian and authoritarian regimes in a spirit of reconciliation, truth and democratic values, while rejecting any exploitation of history for political gain and urging continued scholarly engagement with this complex legacy;

    5. Calls for the preservation of the memory of all innocent victims of the communist regime in Slovenia, from its inception to its downfall;

    6. Underlines the importance of the dedicated work taking place on the full disclosure of historical facts, and the continuation of the official investigative mission to uncover the sites of mass graves in Slovenia in order to document and verify historical evidence of crimes committed;

    7. Highlights that many of those responsible for post-war crimes were not held accountable for their actions;

    8. Believes that the victims of Second World War and post-war retribution violence by the Yugoslav communist authorities in Slovenia must be buried properly and with dignity; calls on the Slovenian authorities to continue to do their utmost to guarantee the universal right to burial, and to maintain supporting institutions that contribute to a scholarly and evidence-based understanding of historical events;

    9. Notes that Member States have established memorials to commemorate totalitarian atrocities; calls on Slovenian authorities to continue investigating concealed graves, conduct dignified burials, and establish memorial sites to serve as reminders for future generations;

    10. Reiterates that the official day of remembrance for the millions of victims of totalitarian regimes, known as the European Day of Remembrance for Victims of All Totalitarian and Authoritarian Regimes, is 23 August;

    11. Stresses the importance of keeping the memory of crimes committed by totalitarian regimes alive, as there can be no reconciliation without remembrance; recalls that remembrance policies fall under the competence of the Member States and therefore do not fall within the scope of EU law; encourages all Member States to actively support remembrance policy projects that foster reconciliation rather than division or political instrumentalisation;

    12. Recalls that the Commission is providing funding under the citizens, equality, rights and values programme to support remembrance actions and research and education projects that reflect on the causes of totalitarian regimes, in particular Nazism, but also fascism, Stalinism and communist regimes, and to commemorate the victims of their crimes;

    13. Believes that a National Day of Remembrance in Slovenia should commemorate victims of authoritarian and totalitarian regimes, including communism, to respect historical justice and contribute to reconciliation;

    14. Calls on the Commission to continue the programme of historical remembrance taking into account all tragedies, to support projects across Europe that address the history of totalitarian crimes, encourage remembrance and serve reconciliation; Reiterates that the crimes of the totalitarian Yugoslav communist regime are not limited to Slovenia and that victims exist in all former Yugoslav republics and autonomous regions;

    15. Calls for a comprehensive examination of the archives of the Yugoslav secret services, in particular KOS and UDBA;

    16. Underlines that all totalitarian regimes should be condemned and that their symbols should not be promoted;

    17. Calls on Slovenia and the other Member States to strive to strengthen historical memory, mutual understanding and reconciliation based on truth and respect for all victims of totalitarian regimes;

    18. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the European Commission, the Council of the European Union, the Slovenian Government and parliament, and the governments and parliaments of the other Member States.

     

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Security: Member of Violent Crew That Robbed South Asian Jewelers at Gunpoint Sentenced to Nine Years in Prison

    Source: US FBI

                WASHINGTON – U.S. Attorney Jeanine Ferris Pirro announced today that Robert Sheffield, 34, of the District of Columbia, was sentenced to 108 months in federal prison for participating in a conspiracy that staged a multi-state string of violent gun-point robberies of South Asian jewelry stores. The robberies netted millions of dollars in cash and gold for a 15-member crew, allegedly led by Trevor Wright, aka rapper “Taliban Glizzy.”

                Sheffield, aka “Da Real Lifaa,” pleaded guilty Feb. 20, 2025, before U.S. District Court Judge Christopher R. Cooper to conspiracy to interfere with interstate commerce by robbery (aka Hobbs Act robbery), and to possessing a firearm in furtherance of a crime of violence and aiding and abetting. In addition to the nine-year prison term, Judge Cooper ordered Sheffield to serve five years of supervised release.

                Before they were apprehended, the co-conspirators robbed at least 11 jewelry stores, terrorized multiple victims and left behind a wake of destruction and financial loss.

                In his plea agreement, Sheffield admitted to his involvement in the Nov. 10, 2023 armed robbery of $1 million in cash and gold from the Baral Jewelers in Harrisburg, Pa., and his role as the gunman during the April 28, 2023 armed robbery of Yasini Jewelers in Falls Church, Va., during which the store owner fired gunshots at the intruders, who returned gunfire.

                In addition to the 108-month prison term, Judge Cooper ordered Sheffield to serve five years of supervised release.

                According to court documents, over the course of 18 months, Sheffield and his co-conspirators engaged in a scheme to rob multiple South Asian jewelry stores of heavy gold jewelry of high purity. The conspiracy began in January 2022 and continued until August 2023 after several of the co-conspirators had been charged and arrested.

                On Nov. 10, 2022, at around 6:30 p.m., Sheffield and several co-conspirators traveled from the District to Baral Jewelers in Harrisburg in two vehicles. After arriving, at least two co-conspirators remained in the vehicles to act as “getaway” drivers, while several others, including Sheffield, rushed into the store. Two armed co-conspirators remained in the front of Baral, a grocery area, subduing the employees and customers there as four others, including the Sheffield, ran to the rear where the gold jewelry was housed.

                As employees and customers in the front of the store cowered in terror, covering their faces or ears, a gunman held the store owner at gunpoint and took about $600 from the cash register. Meanwhile, one of the four suspects in the rear of the store used a gun to coerce an employee to the ground as Sheffield and others smashed the glass display cases and shoveled gold jewelry into large bags.

                A week later, a co-defendant posted an image on social media of Sheffield fanning a stack of cash. On Nov. 30, 2022, the same co-defendant posted an Instagram story of Sheffield purchasing a Rolex watch with cash at a jewelry store in Prince George’s Mall. In the Instagram video, Sheffield counts out multiple $100 bills before the camera pans over to the Rolex he is purchasing and shows a certificate showing an appraisal value for the watch of $11,500.

                On April 28, 2023, Sheffield and at least five co-conspirators drove from the District to Yasini Jewelers in Falls Church, Virginia, which had been a prior target of this conspiracy in January 2022, resulting in the theft of $300,000 to $400,000 in gold jewelry. At 8 p.m., a co-defendant smashed Yasini’s storefront window with a sledgehammer. Immediately, five masked suspects ran into the store through the broken window. Among them was Sheffield, who was armed with a loaded Glock 23, 40 caliber pistol.

                The Yasini store owner retrieved his own firearm and fired once. The co-conspirators fled the store before taking any jewelry. Sheffield fired two shots at the owner before running back to the getaway vehicle.

                On August 30, 2023, law enforcement arrested Sheffield and other codefendants and searched their residences. During a search, law enforcement recovered the firearm Sheffield had discharged in Yasini and further recovered 21 live rounds of 9mm ammunition from Sheffield’s home.

                Sheffield previously served five years in prison for an armed robbery involving use of a firearm.

                This case was investigated by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives Washington Field Division, the Metropolitan Police Department, FBI Newark and Washington Field Offices, and U.S. Marshals Service. It is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorneys Sitara Witanachchi and Andrea Duvall.

    DEFENDANT

    AKA

    HOME

    CHARGES/SENTENCE
    Trevor Wright, 33 Taliban Glizzy Washington DC Interfering with interstate commerce by robbery (aka Hobbs Act robbery);  conspiracy to commit Hobbs Act robbery; possessing a firearm during a crime of violence; money laundering; conspiracy to engage in monetary transactions in property derived from unlawful activity.
    William Hunter, 28 Ill Will Washington DC Sentenced to 228 months on Dec. 11, 2024, after pleading guilty to interfering with interstate commerce by robbery, aka Hobbs Act robbery; and possessing a firearm during a crime of violence.
    Avery Fuller, 29 Deavry Cordell Fuller,  Fully Ace Washington DC Pending sentencing after pleading guilty in the Middle District of Florida to conspiracy to commit Hobbs Act robbery; and possessing a firearm during a crime of violence.
    Franklin Hunter, 30 Gino Washington DC Pleaded guilty Sept. 4, 2024, to conspiracy to commit Hobbs Act robbery; and possessing a firearm during a crime of violence.
    Davon Johnson, 31 YB Washington DC Sentenced to 111 months on November 20, 2024, for conspiracy to commit Hobbs Act robbery; and possessing a firearm during a crime of violence.
    Decarlos Hill, 30 Los Maryland Sentenced to 57 months on November 6, 2024, for conspiracy to commit Hobbs Act robbery.
    Lamont Marable, 28   Washington DC Sentenced to 93 months on November 11, 2024, for interfering with interstate commerce by robbery (aka Hobbs Act robbery);  and possessing a firearm during a crime of violence.
    Keith McDuffie, 27   California Interfering with interstate commerce by robbery (aka Hobbs Act robbery);  conspiracy to commit Hobbs Act robbery; and possessing a firearm during a crime of violence.
    Jameise Christian, 33 Safety, Safe, Safe Play Washington DC Pending sentencing after pleading guilty in the Middle District of Florida to conspiracy to commit Hobbs Act robbery; and possessing a firearm during a crime of violence.
    Andrew Smith, 30 Drewso, Drew Maryland Sentenced to 138 months in prison on Oct.17, 2024, for conspiracy to commit Hobbs Act robbery; and possessing a firearm during a crime of violence.
    Robert Sheffield, 33 Da Real Lifaa Washington DC Sentenced to 108 months on July 2, 2025, for interfering with interstate commerce by robbery (aka Hobbs Act robbery);  possessing a firearm during a crime of violence.
    Jaylaun Brown, 22 Lil Launy Washington DC Pleaded guilty Feb. 7, 2025, to conspiracy to interfere with interstate commerce by robbery (aka Hobbs Act robbery) and brandishing a firearm during the commission of a crime of violence.
    Timothy Conrad, 33 Twin Washington DC Sentenced to 168 months on October 1, 2024, for conspiracy to commit Hobbs Act robbery; and for possessing a firearm during a crime of violence.
    Antonio Tate, 21   Washington DC Sentenced to 120 months for conspiracy to commit Hobbs Act robbery; and for brandishing a firearm during a crime of violence.
    Delonte Martin, 35   Washington DC Sentenced to 108 months for conspiracy to commit Hobbs Act robbery; and for brandishing a firearm during a crime of violence.

    23cr137

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Latest news – 9 July 2025 – meeting – Delegation to the Caribbean-EU Parliamentary Assembly – Delegation to the Africa-EU Parliamentary Assembly

    Source: European Parliament

    On Wednesday, 9 July 2025, 15.00-16.30, the DCAB delegation will hold an ordinary meeting in Strasbourg (room: CHURCHILL 200).

    The two main points of the agenda will be:

    • Exchange of views with H.E Senator the Honourable Kamina Johnson Smith, Minister of Foreign Affairs and Foreign Trade of Jamaica, following the on the 49th Regular Meeting of the Conference of Heads of Government of the Caribbean Community (CARICOM) from 6-8 July 2025 in Montego Bay (Jamaica)
    • Exchange of views on Jamaica’s perspective of the Caribbean-EU Partnership: prospects and challenges under the Samoa Agreement in the presence of: Duccio Bandini, Deputy Head of Division for Mexico, Central America and Caribbean, EEAS

    The meeting will webstreamed.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Press release – Press briefing on next week’s plenary session

    Source: European Parliament

    Spokespersons for Parliament and for the political groups will hold a briefing on the 7 – 10 July plenary session, on Friday at 11.00 in Parliament’s Anna Politkovskaya press room.

    When: Friday 4 July at 11.00

    Where: Anna Politkovskaya press room in Brussels and via Interactio

    Key topics next week include:

    • Debate on the priorities if the Danish Council Presidency with Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen
    • Debate on the results of the 26 June European Council with Presidents Costa and von der Leyen
    • Debate on the upcoming EU-China summit and the need to tackle China’s export restrictions on critical raw materials, followed by a vote on a resolution
    • Debate and vote on a motion of censure against the European Commission
    • Debate on EU-US trade negotiations
    • Debate on the situation in the Middle East
    • Debate on the post-2027 EU long-term budget and Parliament’s expectations ahead of the Commission’s proposal
    • Debate on the new EU 2040 climate target
    • Vote on managing the influx of substandard goods into the EU

    Interpretation of the press briefing will be available in English and French.

    Journalists wishing to participate actively and ask questions, please connect via Interactio using this link: https://ep.interactio.eu/link/pressconfp1611820

    You can follow it live from 11.00 on Friday in Parliament’s Anna Politkovskaya press room or via Parliament’s webstreaming and EbS.

    Information for the media – Use of Interactio to ask questions

    Interactio is only supported on iPads (with the Safari browser) and Mac/Windows (with the Google Chrome browser).

    When connecting, enter your name and the media you are representing in the first name / last name fields. For better sound quality, use headphones and a microphone. Interpretation is only possible for questions asked on video.

    Journalists who have never used Interactio before are asked to connect 30 minutes before the start of the press conference to perform a connection test. IT assistance can be provided if necessary. When connected, open the chat window (upper right corner) to be able to see the service messages.

    For more details, check the connection guidelines and recommendations for remote speakers.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Highlights – Vote on draft opinion on EU strategy for the rights of persons with disabilities – Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality

    Source: European Parliament

    On 16 Jul 2025, the FEMM committee will vote on the draft opinion on EU strategy for the rights of persons with disabilities post-2024 (2025/2057(INI)) and on the question for oral answer, followed by a resolution, on Declaration of principles for a gender-equal society (2025/2780(RSP)). The Committee Members will also hold an exchange of views with Danish Minister for Gender Equality on the priorities of the Danish Presidency.

    Further, the Members will consider the draft opinion on Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy (2025/2095(INI)).

    They will also consider draft opinion, amendments and budgetary amendments to the General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sections.

    Finally, they will hear reporting back on the negotiations (Rule 75(3)) on Victims Rights Directive (2023/0250(COD)).

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Seafood imports from the Russian Federation – P-001903/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    In response to Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, the EU has adopted an unprecedented set of sanctions. With these measures the EU, in close cooperation with its like-minded allies, aims to cripple Russia’s ability to finance its war effort.

    Sanctions are carefully designed to maximise their impact on Russia and its economy, while limiting to the extent possible any negative consequences on EU businesses and citizens.

    The Council adopted its 17th Russia sanctions package on 20 May 2025[1]. This package further restricts Russia’s access to battlefield technologies and cuts Russia’s energy revenues by targeting an unprecedented number of its shadow fleet vessels.

    The package also expands the number of individuals and entities subject to sanctions. While this package did not include any further import restrictions on seafood products, it is important to recall that imports of crustaceans and caviar are subject to restrictive measures since April 2022.

    The Commission is closely monitoring imports of seafood from Russia. Last year, the volume of EU imports decreased by 9% (down to 180 000 tonnes) and their value by 19% (down to around EUR 700 million).

    It is important to note that certain existing dependencies on Russian fisheries products, such as Alaska pollock or cod, have not increased. In light of the stable import flows, the Commission is currently not considering additional tariffs on imports of Russian seafood products, but it continues to monitor the situation.

    Moreover, as of 2024 Russia is excluded from the autonomous tariff quotas for fisheries products, meaning that such products cannot be subject to any tariff reductions when imported in the EU.

    • [1] https://enlargement.ec.europa.eu/news/eu-adopts-17th-sanctions-package-against-russia-2025-05-20_en.
    Last updated: 3 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Moldovan legislature’s worrying attack on the rule of law and its impact on European aid to Moldova – P-000798/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Commission is aware of the head of Moldova’s Anti-Corruption Prosecutor’s Office’s resignation and of the draft law to merge the current specialised prosecutor’s offices on anti-corruption and organised crime in a new Anti-Corruption and Organised Crime Prosecution Office.

    Ensuring effective institutional arrangements and capacity for the fight against corruption and organised crime is essential, and delivering a track record of results in this field is a requirement in the EU accession process.

    Moldovan authorities are advised to ensure the compliance with European standards of any new arrangement they put in place. To this end, the Commission is working with the Moldovan authorities to strengthen the rule of law and fight against corruption and organised crime.

    The Commission will continue to closely monitor developments in Moldova. The progress of Moldova in rule of law will continue to be reflected in the Commission’s annual reporting as part of the enlargement process.

    The Reform and Growth Facility[1] for Moldova includes a strong focus on audit and controls systems and the Commission will carefully assess the situation and ensure that requirements in this respect are met before taking any decisions regarding the disbursement of the financial support, in line with the agreed conditions.

    • [1] Regulation (EU) 2025/535 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 March 2025 establishing the Reform and Growth Facility for the Republic of Moldova, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2025/535/oj/eng.
    Last updated: 3 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Common agricultural policy (CAP) budget and the multiannual financial framework 2028-2034 – E-001605/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    In line with the communication of 11 February 2025 on ‘The road to the next multiannual financial framework’[1] (MFF), the Commission will ensure that the upcoming MFF is simpler, more focused and aligned with EU priorities.

    Food security and nature protection are recognised as vital for Europe’s quality of life and the communication emphasises, in line with the ‘Vision on Agriculture and Food’[2] the need for a fit-for-purpose Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) that provides support to farmers who need it most, enhance environmental and social outcomes and foster thriving rural areas.

    In doing so, it should become simpler, targeted and find the right balance b etween incentives, investment and regulation while ensuring that farmers have a fair and sufficient income.

    As per the political guidelines 2024-2029 of the Commission[3] and the mentioned Communication, at the core of this modernised budget there would be a plan for each country with key reforms and investments, focusing on EU joint priorities, including promoting economic, social and territorial cohesion, and designed and implemented in partnership with national, regional and local authorities. The next MFF will continue to support Cohesion policy and CAP to deliver on their respective objectives in the most effective way.

    The European Parliament will have an important role in shaping the next MFF. Its consent is required for the Council to adopt the MFF Regulation at unanimity.

    As a co-legislator and as per the Interinstitutional agreement on cooperation in budgetary matters[4], the European Parliament will also be able to influence the future instruments during the negotiation of the sectoral basic acts, in the same way as it did for the current MFF.

    • [1] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52025DC0046.
    • [2] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52025DC0075.
    • [3] https://commission.europa.eu/document/download/e6cd4328-673c-4e7a-8683-f63ffb2cf648_en.
    • [4] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32020Q1222(01).
    Last updated: 3 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Pre-removal detention centres (CPRs) in Albania and compliance with EU rules, principles and standards – E-001425/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    In accordance with the information available to the Commission, one of the centres established on Albanian territory on the basis of the bilateral protocol with Albania can be used as a pre-removal detention centre subject to Italian law and jurisdiction. This is an intermediate step before an illegally staying third-country national is returned to a third country.

    The Return Directive[1] sets out common standards and procedures for the return of illegally staying third-country nationals, including on detention for the purpose of removal, in accordance with the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU and international law, including the right to asylum and the principle of non-refoulement.

    • [1] Directive 2008/115/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals, OJ L 348, 24.12.2008, p. 98-107.
    Last updated: 3 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Energy sovereignty and Turkish interference – how is Greece being protected? – E-001887/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The EU has a strategic interest in stability and security in the Eastern Mediterranean and in maintaining a cooperative and mutually beneficial relationship with Türkiye.

    A stable and secure environment in the Eastern Mediterranean requires unequivocal commitment to good neighbourly relations, to international agreements and to the peaceful settlement of disputes in accordance with the United Nations Charter as well as abstaining from unilateral actions that violate international law and the sovereign rights of Member States.

    Türkiye is a candidate country and a key EU partner. In the 2024 enlargement report[1], the Commission emphasised that Türkiye must avoid actions that damage good neighbourly relations and respect the sovereignty of all Member States and their sovereign rights.

    This includes the right to explore and exploit natural resources in accordance with EU and international law, in particular the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea.

    In its Council Conclusions of December 2024[2], the EU noted the improvements in relations between Greece and Türkiye and expressed its expectations that these improvements will be sustained.

    • [1] https://enlargement.ec.europa.eu/turkiye-report-2024_en.
    • [2] https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-16983-2024-INIT/en/pdf.
    Last updated: 3 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – The promotion and protection of the rights of traditional national and linguistic minorities within the European Union and beyond – P-002630/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Priority question for written answer  P-002630/2025
    to the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy
    Rule 144
    Loránt Vincze (PPE)

    While the Commission has consistently replied to parliamentary questions and in its communication on the European Citizens’ Initiative ‘Minority SafePack – one million signatures for diversity in Europe’[1], that the EU has no general legislative competence for the protection of national minorities, press reports[2] indicate that the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (VP/HR) stated, in the context of future enlargement, that ‘we are protecting minority rights within the EU and not outside of it’.

    The European neighbourhood policy is grounded in shared values such as democracy, the rule of law and respect for human rights.

    • 1.While EU candidate countries must meet the Copenhagen criteria, including for the protection of minorities, could the VP/HR confirm whether these criteria apply equally to all candidate countries, including Ukraine, and indicate how the VP/HR assesses their consistent application?
    • 2.Which specific European Union instruments and measures did the VP/HR reference in relation to the protection of national and linguistic minorities within the EU?

    Submitted: 30.6.2025

    • [1] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=intcom:C(2021)171.
    • [2] https://europeanconservative.com/articles/news-corner/hungarian-fm-szijjarto-slams-kaja-kallas-over-scandalous-remarks/.
    Last updated: 3 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – ‘ReArm Europe’ package and the use of cohesion programmes and funding for defence – E-001065/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The ReArm Europe Plan foresees the possibility to incentivise defence-related investments in the EU budget. This has been deemed necessary to support Member States’ defence readiness as underlined in the Joint White Paper for European Defence — Readiness 2030[1].

    The ReArm Europe Plan has been devised, in light of the current geopolitical tensions, by the Commission to respond to a European Council tasking, notably to present a set of ‘developed options […] for public and private funding to strengthen the defence technological and industrial base and address critical capability gaps’[2].

    As part of this plan, the Commission adopted on 1 April 2025 measures to address strategic challenges in the context of the mid-term review[3] of cohesion policy funds via amendments to existing cohesion policy regulations.

    Those aims at incentivising Member States to voluntarily adjust their cohesion programmes to invest in the EU’s emerging strategic priorities.

    In particular, the proposal enables Member States to make better use of current possibilities to build resilient infrastructures to foster military mobility and to support and enhance productive capacities of small and large enterprises in the defence sector. Furthermore, the proposal will also encourage skills development in the defence industry to narrow the existing skills gap.

    All proposals by the Commission respect the procedures foreseen in terms of impact assessment and stakeholder consultations, as outlined in the appropriate Commission Staff Working Document[4].

    Rules for adoption of cohesion policy programme amendments are not modified and therefore will be subject to approval by the monitoring committees as applicable to ensure scrutiny by stakeholders.

    • [1] https://commission.europa.eu/document/download/e6d5db69-e0ab-4bec-9dc0-3867b4373019_en?filename=White%20paper%20for%20European%20defence%20%E2%80%93%20Readiness%202030.pdf.
    • [2]  European Council conclusions, 27 June 2024 (conclusion 26, p. 8).
    • [3]  COM(2025)123 final; https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/communication/mid-term-review-2025/communication-mid-term-review-2025_en.pdf.
    • [4] https://commission.europa.eu/document/download/d0bbd77f-bee5-4ee5-b5c4-6110c7605476_en?filename=swd2021_305_en.pdf.
    Last updated: 3 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: MOTION OF CENSURE ON THE COMMISSION – B10-0319/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    pursuant to Rule 131 of the Rules of Procedure

    Gheorghe Piperea, Adrian‑George Axinia, Claudiu‑Richard Târziu, Georgiana Teodorescu, Şerban Dimitrie Sturdza, Fidias Panayiotou, Daniel Obajtek, Ivan David, Patryk Jaki, Zsuzsanna Borvendég, Fernand Kartheiser, Nikolaos Anadiotis, Volker Schnurrbusch, Katarína Roth Neveďalová, Irmhild Boßdorf, Virginie Joron, Ondřej Dostál, Cristian Terheş, Christine Anderson, António Tânger Corrêa, Emmanouil Fragkos, Milan Mazurek, Alexander Jungbluth, Siegbert Frank Droese, Petar Volgin, Rada Laykova, Stanislav Stoyanov, Arno Bausemer, Arkadiusz Mularczyk, Bogdan Rzońca, Milan Uhrík, Mary Khan, Tomasz Froelich, Hans Neuhoff, Alexander Sell, René Aust, Petr Bystron, Jacek Ozdoba, Galato Alexandraki, Kosma Złotowski, Waldemar Buda, Tobiasz Bocheński, Małgorzata Gosiewska, Marlena Maląg, Mariusz Kamiński, Dominik Tarczyński, Anna Zalewska, Jadwiga Wiśniewska, Maciej Wąsik, Michał Dworczyk, Alvise Pérez, Luis‑Vicențiu Lazarus, Erik Kaliňák, Judita Laššáková, Waldemar Tomaszewski, Ewa Zajączkowska‑Hernik, Jaak Madison, Anja Arndt, Marcin Sypniewski, Markus Buchheit, Filip Turek, Friedrich Pürner, Kateřina Konečná, Ľuboš Blaha, Thierry Mariani, Jan‑Peter Warnke, Thomas Geisel, Branislav Ondruš, Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă, Monika Beňová, Marc Jongen, Nikola Bartůšek, Grzegorz Braun, Sarah Knafo, Petras Gražulis, Piotr Müller, Gerald Hauser

    B10‑0319/2025

    Motion of censure on the Commission by the European Parliament

    (2025/2140(RSP))

    The European Parliament,

     having regard to Article 17(8) of the Treaty on European Union (TEU), Article 234 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) and Article 106a of the Euratom Treaty,

     having regard to the request submitted under Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents[1] by Matina Stevi, a journalist employed by The New York Times, seeking access to all text messages exchanged between President Ursula von der Leyen and Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla between 1 January 2021 and 11 May 2022,

     having regard to the Commission’s refusal of this request on the grounds that it does not possess the requested documents,

     having regard to the judgment of the General Court of 14 May 2025, in Case T-36/23 Stevi – The New York Times / Commission[2], which found that the Commission has not given a plausible explanation to justify the non- possession of the requested documents concerning its dealings with Pfizer/BioNTech in the procurement of COVID-19 vaccines and which clarified that the Commission’s duty of transparency is fundamental and that refusal to disclose documents must be strictly justified with compelling reasons,

     having regard to Article 10(3) TEU, which guarantees the right of citizens to participate in the democratic life of the Union and calls for decisions to be taken openly and as closely as possible to the citizen,

     having regard to Rule 131 of its Rules of Procedure,

    A. whereas the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO) opened an investigation in 2022 into the European Commission’s conduct in the negotiation and conclusion of COVID-19 vaccine procurement contracts with Pfizer, which remains ongoing as of 2025 and raises credible concerns regarding potential legal and ethical breaches, as well as potential irregularities in the management of Union financial resources;

    B. whereas the General Court of the European Union, in its order of 5 October 2023 in Case T- 36/23, Stevi – The New York Times/ Commission, ruled that the Commission had failed to provide legally sufficient justification for its refusal to disclose the requested documents related to the Pfizer vaccine negotiations;

    C. whereas the Commission contravened its obligations under Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 on public access to documents and violated the principles of transparency, good administration, and institutional accountability stipulated in the Treaties;

    D. whereas the Commission allocated EUR 35 billion in public funds for COVID-19 vaccines, yet failed to ensure transparency and accountability, especially as EUR 4 billion worth of doses remained unused, raising serious concerns over financial oversight and administrative failure;

    E. whereas the General Court, in its judgment of 14 May 2025, annulled the European Commission’s decision to deny access to text messages between Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla, exchanged between 1 January 2021 and 11 May 2022, concerning the procurement of COVID-19 vaccines;

    F. whereas the Court of Auditors, in its Special Report No. 22/2024 adopted on 26 September 2024, identified serious shortcomings in the implementation of the Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF), including insufficient linkages between disbursed funds and actual costs, weak verification mechanisms, risks of double funding, and delays in achieving investment targets, raising significant concerns over the Commission’s oversight of one of the largest post-COVID financial instruments;

    G. whereas the Court of Auditors has pointed out that the lack of robust controls and the reliance on self-reporting by Member States increase the risk of double funding’, a situation in which the same actions may be financed multiple times, leading to inefficiencies and potential misuse of funds;

    H. whereas, transparency and accountability are fundamental principles of the Union’s democratic legitimacy, as per Article 10(3) of the TEU, ensuring public trust in the institutions of the European Union, particularly in contexts involving major public health challenges and substantial financial commitments;

    I. whereas, its Committee on Legal Affairs, on 23 April 2025, unanimously adopted a non-binding opinion rejecting the European Commission’s use of Article 122 TFEU as the legal basis for the proposal for a Regulation establishing the Security Action for Europe (SAFE), a EUR 150 billion defence financing initiative;

    J. whereas the opinion of the Committee on Legal Affairs asserts that the Commission’s invocation of Article 122 TFEU lacks a valid emergency justification, in view of the fact that the provision is intended for short-term measures addressing immediate crises, not for long-term defence investments;

    K. whereas serious concerns have been raised regarding the Commission’s unlawful interference in elections in Member States such as Romania and Germany through a distorted application of Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 October 2022 on a Single Market For Digital Services and amending Directive 2000/31/EC (Digital Services Act)[3], which is intended to protect consumers but has been misused to justify vote restrictions and election annulments;

    1. Concludes that the Commission led by President Ursula von der Leyen no longer commands the confidence of Parliament to uphold the principles of transparency, accountability, and good governance essential to a democratic Union;

    2. Concludes that the Commission’s unlawful interference in Member States’ elections, via a misapplication of the Digital Services Act, represents a serious breach of its mandate to uphold democratic principles and respect national sovereignty;

    3. Notes that the Commission’s abusive use of Article 122 TFEU as the legal basis for the SAFE Regulation, a EUR 150 billion defence financing initiative, constitutes a serious breach of competence and a distortion of the article’s intended purpose, which is reserved for economic emergency situations;

    4. Considers that this procedural abuse undermines trust in the Union’s institutions and threatens the integrity of the Union’s legal framework;

    5. Calls on the Commission to resign due to repeated failures to ensure transparency and to its persistent disregard for democratic oversight and the rule of law within the Union;

    6. Instructs its President to forward this motion of censure to the President of the Council and the President of the Commission and to notify them of the result of the vote on it in plenary.

     

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Possible suspension of the Association Agreement with Israel – E-002512/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002512/2025
    to the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy
    Rule 144
    Erik Kaliňák (NI)

    On 17 June 2025, the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, Kaja Kallas, made a statement that received wide media coverage, indicating that the EU would review its Association Agreement with Israel due to Israel’s human rights violations in the Gaza Strip[1] [2]. There is no doubt that human rights violations by a specific state also constitute a violation of international law.

    In this connection:

    • 1.Does the Vice-President / High Representative consider the suspension of the agreement to be a sufficient measure?
    • 2.Does she also plan to submit a proposal for EU sanctions against Israeli officials responsible for these human rights violations? In similar cases, sanctions have been proposed against officials of other states and regimes.
    • 3.What further steps (diplomatic efforts, etc.) does the EU plan to take in the Middle East?

    Submitted: 23.6.2025

    • [1] https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/eu-will-review-trade-deal-with-israel-kallas-says-2025-05-20/
    • [2] https://epthinktank.eu/2025/06/12/review-of-the-eu-israel-association-agreement/
    Last updated: 3 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Implementation of emergency communication systems – E-002572/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002572/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Pascal Arimont (PPE), Liesbet Sommen (PPE), Željana Zovko (PPE), Andrzej Buła (PPE), Lena Düpont (PPE), Joachim Streit (Renew), Hélder Sousa Silva (PPE), Olivier Chastel (Renew), Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral (PPE), Grégory Allione (Renew)

    The preparedness union strategy stresses the need to strengthen Europe’s crisis resilience through, among other factors, more effective public warning systems. New strategies will only add value if they are implemented by the Member States. Almost five years after the deadline for implementation, eight Member States have not yet fulfilled the EU requirements laid down in the European Electronic Communications Code (EECC) to improve safety during emergencies.

    – Article 109 EECC required Member States to implement advanced caller location by December 2020. Poland, Cyprus and Malta still have not done so.

    – Article 110 EECC required Member States to implement a mobile-based public warning system by June 2022. Ireland, Slovakia, Cyprus, Slovenia, Finland, Latvia and Italy have not implemented such a system.

    Both technologies play a critical role in improving public safety by helping to quickly locate people in need and by allowing civil protection authorities to send people warnings about imminent threats.

    • 1.Does the Commission agree that advanced caller location and mobile-based public warning systems improve public safety and societal resilience?
    • 2.Will the Commission initiate proceedings against the Member States that have not fulfilled their obligations under Articles 109 and 110 EECC?
    • 3.If not, how will the Commission ensure that its future preparedness laws will be implemented effectively if Member States face no consequences for non-compliance?

    Submitted: 25.6.2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Intervention by the Madleen following a Frontex distress signal – clarification of practices and responsibilities – P-002629/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Priority question for written answer  P-002629/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Fabrice Leggeri (PfE)

    On 5 June 2025, the vessel Madleen, undertaking a private sea mission to Gaza, was apparently asked by Frontex to approach a boat of migrants in distress off the coast of Crete. According to Rima Hassan MEP, a passenger on board, the Madleen had been identified as being closest to the boat and had received a distress signal from Frontex.

    Upon arrival, the vessel reportedly rescued four people who had jumped into the sea to get away from the Libyan Coast Guard, while the remaining migrants were rescued by another vessel and taken back to Libya.

    In view of the above, I ask the Commission and Frontex:

    • 1.Is it normal Frontex procedure to ask a civilian vessel engaged in a private or political initiative to intervene at sea, and is this practice regulated?
    • 2.Can the Commission confirm the facts reported about the distress signal sent by Frontex and the Madleen’s intervention?
    • 3.What is its legal and operational assessment of this chain of events, and is this situation compatible with international law, in particular the law of the sea, and with the EU’s commitments?

    Submitted: 30.6.2025

    Last updated: 3 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Briefing – EU-UK 2025 Leaders’ Summit: Setting the path for further rapprochement – 03-07-2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Amid Brexit’s negative consequences for the British economy and with the 2024 leadership change in the United Kingdom, the shift towards closer European Union-UK relations has gained momentum. After months of negotiation, the first EU-UK leaders’ summit took place in London on 19 May 2025. Both sides agreed on global priorities of common strategic interest, such as support for multilateralism and Ukraine’s territorial integrity. The parties also established a Security and Defence Partnership, based on biannual structured foreign policy dialogue and consultation mechanisms to facilitate the exchange of information and cooperation. To this end, regular thematic dialogues on a range of security issues will commence. The partnership paves the way for UK participation in the EU’s common joint defence procurement (SAFE initiative). The summit cemented an accord on full reciprocal access to fishing waters until 30 June 2038. The UK and EU also agreed to extend energy cooperation on a permanent basis. Further negotiations will continue, on the youth mobility scheme (including UK participation in Erasmus+), UK participation in the EU’s internal electricity market, linking emission trading systems and establishing a common sanitary and phytosanitary (SPS) area. Many experts see the summit as an important step towards further rapprochement, as the UK indicated willingness to dynamically align some of its laws with the EU legal framework, recognise the authority of the Court of Justice of the EU and cooperate closely on security and defence issues. However, some point to a lack of milestones and solid progress monitoring tools. In numerous resolutions, the European Parliament has called for closer cooperation on trade, security and for UK participation in several EU programmes. Parliament will be involved in scrutinising any implementing legislation and giving or refusing consent if further binding international agreements, such as the SPS area, materialise as a result of the London summit.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Briefing – Tackling cyberbullying at regional/local level – 03-07-2025

    Source: European Parliament

    The growth in accessibility of online spaces and digital channels has been remarkable in recent years, providing citizens with many benefits, including enhanced communication, greater learning opportunities and easier access to private and public services. However, this growth has seen a commensurate increase in the associated risks and harms. Cyberbullying, cyber-violence and sexual extortion are just some of the dangers to which people, particularly vulnerable people, are exposed in the digital environment. In our ‘always-on’ world, issues such as cyberbullying can be a relentless experience and can leave victims with a constant sense of being under attack. Like the digital space itself, these dangers know no borders, which can make the problem a global issue. The solutions therefore are not ‘one size fits all’, but a combination of regional, national and transnational actions. The examples outlined here at regional level, while varying in size and scope, all have a common thread, which is the recognition of the risks to people and the desire to make a positive change. The approaches taken often involve a coordinated or cooperative style, with the involvement of students, teachers and parents. The message is consistent on the importance of recognising the dangers of the internet. It is important for victims to be able to quickly identify cyberbullying, cyber-violence and sexual extortion, and know how to deal with it and whom to turn to, in order to prevent risks from turning into harm. This briefing has been drafted at the request of a member of the European Committee of the Regions, in the framework of the cooperation agreement between the European Parliament and the Committee.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Briefing – Revisiting the GDPR: Lessons from the United Kingdom experience – 03-07-2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Momentum is building around data protection reform, with the European Commission proposing targeted changes to ease compliance for small and mid-cap enterprises, and the United Kingdom (UK) adopting broad reforms at its third attempt. The UK’s reform proposals, aimed at boosting economic growth and innovation, focused on reducing administrative burdens, promoting data reuse for research, and facilitating artificial intelligence development. However, critics warned these reforms unduly weaken fundamental rights and jeopardise the UK’s adequacy status with the European Union (EU). As the United States pressures the EU to adopt a more lenient regulatory stance, and industry voices call for a wider review of the General Data Protection Regulation, the UK’s experience offers cautionary lessons. Any broader reform effort that is not carefully designed and fails to account for the public’s strong data protection expectations will likely face significant opposition from civil society.

    MIL OSI Europe News