NewzIntel.com

    • Checkout Page
    • Contact Us
    • Default Redirect Page
    • Frontpage
    • Home-2
    • Home-3
    • Lost Password
    • Member Login
    • Member LogOut
    • Member TOS Page
    • My Account
    • NewzIntel Alert Control-Panel
    • NewzIntel Latest Reports
    • Post Views Counter
    • Privacy Policy
    • Public Individual Page
    • Register
    • Subscription Plan
    • Thank You Page

Category: Education

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Improved PE and sport for more than 240,000 pupils with SEND

    Source: United Kingdom – Government Statements

    Press release

    Improved PE and sport for more than 240,000 pupils with SEND

    Government launches Inclusion 2028 programme which will improve access to PE and school sports for pupils with SEND.

    Hundreds of thousands of pupils with special educational needs and disabilities (SEND) are set to benefit from a national programme to improve access to PE and school sports.

    Backed by an initial £300,000 for the first year, the Inclusion 2028 programme will work with a network of 50 Youth Sport Trust lead schools to provide expert training to teachers to help them create and deliver lessons that meet the diverse needs of all pupils – including those with physical, sensory, cognitive, communication or social and emotional needs.

    In doing this, the programme encourages more varied and creative teaching methods that engage all learners – in turn, improving attendance and creating a school environment where all children can achieve and thrive. It will also provide leadership opportunities for 1,500 pupils who will develop activities for their peers as part of the programme, with schools across the country set to host events inspired by the Paralympic Games and Commonwealth Games. Alongside this, it will see 600 new extra-curricular clubs established offering pupils, including those with diverse needs, the opportunity to take part in a range of sports such as tennis, boccia and archery after the school day.

    Taking part in physical exercise can support muscle and motor skills, as well as a sense of achievement, confidence, social connection and better mental health.

    The programme supports the government’s Plan for Change in breaking down barriers to opportunity and ensuring every child and young person can achieve and thrive. It expects to work with over 8,000 schools supporting more than 240,000 pupils and 10,000 teachers and practitioners in England across the three years.

    School Standards Minister, Catherine McKinnell said:

    Sport has the unique power to break down barriers, build confidence and foster a sense of belonging.

    Inclusion 2028 will ensure young people experience the benefits of sport and physical activity, from improved mental wellbeing and teamwork skills to greater resilience.

    By building a generation of teachers with the skills and confidence to deliver high-quality PE and school sport for all pupils, we can ensure that every child gets their chance to shine.

    Paralympian, Laura Sugar MBE PLY, said:

    As a Paralympian and a PE teacher I see first-hand the importance of inclusive sport for all and access to PE in schools for disabled children, so I’m absolutely delighted to be a part of this campaign which is so close to my heart. Growing up as a child with a disability I have experienced how physical activity can help improve day-to-day life and enhance mobility, as well as social and mental benefits so it is important that we make PE accessible for all.

    It’s fantastic that the new direction of the Inclusion 28 programme will support the calls made by ParalympicsGB’s Equal Play campaign to ensure that no disabled child is excluded from school sport, and I know that together the Consortium can help drive important, positive change.

    Eden Hays, 13, a pupil at Brooklands Middle School, said:

    Sport is important for everyone’s mental health and wellbeing, but especially for children with disabilities, where life is that bit harder. Being active has helped keep me both physically and mentally strong and ensured opportunities both in and out of school. Opportunities not just in competing, but both leading and educating too. Sport can be adapted for everyone and should be enjoyed by all.

    CEO of the Youth Sport Trust, Ali Oliver MBE said:

    We are pleased the Department for Education is continuing to support the transformation of PE and school sport, and access to daily physical activity for children and young people with special educational needs and disabilities.

    The Youth Sport Trust believes these opportunities play a fundamental role in the education and enrichment provided by schools, and the experience offers an invaluable opportunity for young people to express themselves, enjoy movement, and develop essential life skills.

    Too many children, particularly those with additional needs, are either missing out or still face barriers to inclusion and there is so much more to do to create the capacity capability and opportunity in the system for every child.

    We feel incredibly proud to continue leading the delivery of this important programme working alongside a distinguished collaboration of partners all of which are equally committed to this mission. Together through our work with schools, teachers and young people we know inclusive practice can give every child equal access, increase participation, and as a result enjoy the life-changing benefits of play and sport.

    Inclusion 2028 is delivered by a consortium of the Youth Sport Trust, ParalympicsGB, Swim England, Activity Alliance and nasen and supported by the Association for PE and Sport for Confidence.

    DfE media enquiries

    Central newsdesk – for journalists 020 7783 8300

    Share this page

    The following links open in a new tab

    • Share on Facebook (opens in new tab)
    • Share on Twitter (opens in new tab)

    Updates to this page

    Published 15 May 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom –

    May 15, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Russia: Dmitry Chernyshenko proposed publishing a jubilee collection of Vladimir Zhirinovsky’s works

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: Government of the Russian Federation – An important disclaimer is at the bottom of this article.

    The State Duma held the second meeting of the organizing committee for the preparation and holding of the celebration of the 80th anniversary of the birth of the founder of the LDPR Vladimir Zhirinovsky

    May 14, 2025

    Dmitry Chernyshenko during a meeting of the organizing committee for the preparation and holding of the celebration of the 80th anniversary of the birth of the founder of the LDPR Vladimir Zhirinovsky

    May 14, 2025

    Chairman of the State Duma Vyacheslav Volodin

    May 14, 2025

    Minister of Education Sergey Kravtsov

    May 14, 2025

    Minister of Science and Higher Education Valery Falkov

    May 14, 2025

    Previous news Next news

    The State Duma held the second meeting of the organizing committee for the preparation and holding of the celebration of the 80th anniversary of the birth of the founder of the LDPR Vladimir Zhirinovsky

    The State Duma held the second meeting of the organizing committee for the preparation and holding of the celebration of the 80th anniversary of the birth of the founder of the LDPR, Vladimir Zhirinovsky, where the plan for the main events was considered.

    Chairman of the State Duma Vyacheslav Volodin, noting the scale of Vladimir Zhirinovsky’s personality, emphasized the importance of perpetuating his memory: “We must do everything so that the memory of him, as a person who did a lot to create the party-political system of our state, who headed the faction in the State Duma throughout his entire time, lives and is passed on from generation to generation.” He recalled that Vladimir Zhirinovsky did a lot to strengthen the Russian state.

    Vyacheslav Volodin told what has already been done within the framework of the memorial events: “Starting September 1, scholarships named after Vladimir Volfovich Zhirinovsky will be paid to the most gifted, talented students who have achieved high results in the field that Vladimir Volfovich loved – in oriental studies. He was a specialist in it.”

    The Chairman of the State Duma noted the efforts made by the leader of the LDPR faction Leonid Slutsky: “Leonid Eduardovich and his colleagues are doing a lot to ensure that the Vladimir Volfovich museum is opened next year. It will be located in the headquarters of the LDPR party. This is a home place for Vladimir Volfovich.”

    Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Chernyshenko took part in the meeting. He emphasized that Vladimir Zhirinovsky left behind a significant scientific and literary legacy, and put forward an initiative to publish a jubilee collection of his works.

    “Considering that Vladimir Volfovich left behind a significant scientific, literary, journalistic legacy, if Vyacheslav Viktorovich Volodin supports it, I propose considering the possibility of creating a commission at the State Duma, which could include scientists, historians and sociologists from the country’s leading universities, such as Moscow State University, Russian State University for the Humanities, and St. Petersburg State University. It would analyze the existing legacy, propose a publication structure and select works and documentation to publish a collection of his works,” the Deputy Prime Minister said.

    Dmitry Chernyshenko also noted that on the eve of the committee meeting he discussed preparations for the anniversary with LDPR Chairman Leonid Slutsky. As a result, the draft plan of events was significantly expanded: federal ministries and departments, the Russian Academy of Sciences, as well as major public organizations and media will participate in the implementation of 56 events.

    In conclusion, the Deputy Prime Minister thanked all members of the Government and personally the Chairman of the State Duma Vyacheslav Volodin for their active participation in the preparation of the anniversary. The Deputy Prime Minister added that all work is under the control of the Chairman of the Government Mikhail Mishustin.

    The meeting of the organizing committee was also attended by the Minister of Education Sergey Kravtsov, the Minister of Science and Higher Education Valery Falkov, the Minister of Culture Olga Lyubimova, the Minister of Finance Anton Siluanov, the Minister of Transport Roman Starovoit, the Deputy Head of the Federal Agency for Youth Affairs Denis Ashirov, State Duma deputies, senators and other members of the organizing committee.

    The 80th anniversary of Vladimir Zhirinovsky’s birth will be celebrated on April 25, 2026. By decree of Russian President Vladimir Putin dated November 6, 2024, State Duma Chairman Vyacheslav Volodin was appointed head of the organizing committee. The committee includes parliamentarians, government representatives, scientists, representatives of the university community and major media.

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    MIL OSI Russia News –

    May 15, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Tiffany Announces 2025 Service Academy Day

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Representative Tom Tiffany (WI-07)

    WAUSAU, WI – Today, Congressman Tom Tiffany (WI-07) announced his 2025 Service Academy Day will be on Saturday, July 12th in Merrill. The event will be held at the Northwoods Veterans Post from 10 AM to 1 PM with registration beginning at 9:30 AM. 

    “It is my honor to invite all students in the Seventh District who are interested in serving in our nation’s military to attend my Service Academy Day. It is a great opportunity to get firsthand insight into both the application and nomination processes,” said Congressman Tiffany. 

    Service Academy Days are designed to familiarize students and parents who reside within Wisconsin’s Seventh Congressional District with the application and nomination processes for each of the U.S. service academies. The deadline to apply for a service academy nomination from Congressman Tiffany is Friday, September 26th at 5 PM CST.

    Details for Merrill Service Academy Day: 
    Saturday, July 12th, 2025
    Location: Northwoods Veterans Post
    601 Johnson Street
    Merrill, WI 54452
    Time: 10 AM – 1 PM 

    (Registration begins at 9:30 AM)

      

    Students will have the opportunity to learn best practices when seeking a nomination to a service academy from members of Congressman Tiffany’s staff, as well as representatives from all five military branches. Parents, teachers, and students at any grade level are welcome to attend, free of charge.
     
    All high school students admitted to our nation’s military service academies must first receive a nomination from at least one member of their state’s Congressional Delegation, the Vice President, or the President of the United States. Accepted students receive a fully funded, four-year university education and a commission as a U.S. military officer upon graduation. High school students seeking Congressman Tiffany’s service academy nomination should visit his website to access the application and learn more about the nomination process.  

    ###

    MIL OSI USA News –

    May 15, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Hinson Announces IA-02 Congressional Art Competition Winner

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Congresswoman Ashley Hinson (IA-01)

    Washington, D.C. – Congresswoman Ashley Hinson (IA-02) announced the winner of the 2025 Congressional Art Competition for Iowa’s Second District, Asia Carter. Asia is a senior at Alburnett High School in Alburnett, IA. Her winning piece, Ranch Days, will hang in the U.S. Capitol. 

    “Congratulations to Asia on winning this year’s Congressional Art Competition for Iowa’s Second Congressional District. I’m amazed by Asia’s talent as a young artist and look forward to seeing her artwork displayed in the United States Capitol.” – Congresswoman Ashley Hinson

    ###

    MIL OSI USA News –

    May 15, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Rep. Clyde Announces 2025 Congressional Art Competition Winners

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Representative Andrew S. Clyde (R-GA)

    Rep. Clyde Announces 2025 Congressional Art Competition Winners

    Gainesville, May 14, 2025

    GAINESVILLE, GA — Last week, Congressman Andrew Clyde (GA-09) celebrated the winners of the 2025 Congressional Art Competition for Georgia’s Ninth District.

     

    The winners include:

    • First Place: Philip Jeong’s “Hope” | Hongik Art Studio
    • Second Place: Chloe Kim’s “I Have Nothing to Wear” | North Gwinnett High School
    • Third Place: Sophia Byron’s “The Courthouse” | Union County High School

    “Congratulations to Philip on his exciting accomplishment of winning first place in this year’s Congressional Art Competition! I look forward to his impressive artwork being displayed in the U.S. Capitol for visitors, staff, and Members of Congress to enjoy,” said Clyde. “Additionally, I’d like to congratulate Chloe and Sophia for their remarkable work and creative designs. This annual competition continues to highlight the incredible talent of young artists in the Ninth District.”

     

     

    Rep. Clyde Awards First Place to Philip Jeong’s “Hope”

     

    [Woo Yong Jeong, Philip’s father, accepted the award on his behalf.]

     

     

    First Place: “Hope” by Philip Jeong

    As the winner of the 2025 Congressional Art Competition, Philip’s artwork will soon be displayed in the Cannon Tunnel of the U.S. Capitol building, where it will remain for one year alongside winning submissions from every congressional district across the country.

     

     

    Second Place: “I Have Nothing to Wear” by Chloe Kim

     

     

    Rep. Clyde Awards Second Place to Chloe Kim’s “I Have Nothing to Wear”

     

     

    Third Place: “The Courthouse” by Sophia Byron

     

     

    Rep. Clyde Awards Third Place to Sophia Byron’s “The Courthouse”

     

    MIL OSI USA News –

    May 15, 2025
  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: expert reaction to trial of treating depression with mindfulness-based cognitive therapy in those who haven’t improved after NHS Talking Therapies

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    May 14, 2025

    A trial published in Lancet Psychiatry looks at mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for depression in those who haven’t improved after NHS Talking Therapies. 

    Dr Elena Makovac, Senior Lecturer in Clinical Psychology, Brunel University of London, said:

    “Treatment-resistant or difficult-to-treat depression poses a significant challenge for the NHS system, with its impact on healthcare costs being substantial and possibly underestimated. This is due to the multifaceted nature of depression, which often includes various somatic symptoms. This study addresses a critical question: what additional treatment options can be offered to patients who have exhausted first-line interventions, including a full course of Talking Therapies—typically 12 or more sessions? Patients with treatment-resistant depression not only continue to suffer, but the knowledge that no further treatment options are available exacerbates feelings of hopelessness, leading to further deterioration of their mental health.

    “A key limitation of the study is that, by comparing MCBT (Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy) plus treatment-as-usual with the treatment-as-usual group, we cannot definitively determine whether the observed improvements were specifically due to the MCBT, or if they resulted from the fact that the MCBT group received more treatment overall compared to the control group. This improvement could potentially have been achieved with an extension of the originally delivered Talking Therapies.

    “While research into additional treatments for difficult-to-treat depression is essential, it is even more important to offer interventions grounded in well-understood mechanisms. This process begins with a crucial first step: answering the question of why some patients do not respond to Talking Therapies.”

    From our colleagues at SMC Spain

    Maria Serra-Blasco, Principal investigator, Digital Health Programme ICOnnecta’t, and member of the Group of Psycho-oncology and Digital Health at IDIBELL, said:

    “This study provides very strong evidence for the value of Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT) as a treatment option for people with depression who have not improved after receiving intensive psychological treatments within the NHS. Compared to treatment as usual, adding MBCT – delivered in a group and by video call – achieved a greater reduction in depressive symptoms, with benefits sustained up to six months later. Improvements in participants’ work and social functioning were also observed.

    “A particularly relevant finding is that this intervention, validated in a group and online format, proves to be effective even in people with complex clinical conditions: many of the participants had a history of depression from an early age, several relapses, comorbidities and were on medication. The fact that MBCT works in this context suggests that it can be an effective and safe alternative in cases of difficult-to-treat depression, and not only as an add-on, but also as a possible next step when other approaches have failed.

    “Validating this approach in an online and group format is an important step forward, as it considerably improves its scalability: it allows it to be offered to more people, at lower cost and without the need for travel, which is key to broadening access to evidence-based psychological treatments.

    “Furthermore, from a health perspective, MBCT showed good cost-effectiveness: not only was it clinically more effective, but it also reduced costs in health and social services, even considering the resources needed for its implementation. This evidence, together with previous studies, supports its inclusion in clinical guidelines as a second- or third-line treatment.

    “In Spain, MBCT has also been shown to be feasible and safe in primary care (Elices et al., 2022). Although it does not replace conventional treatments, it represents a promising, accessible and scalable tool that can expand therapeutic options in the public health system.”

    Jesús Montero-Marín, Miguel Servet Senior Researcher at the Teaching, Research and Innovation Unit of the Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, member of the Department of Psychiatry at Warneford Hospital-University of Oxford (UK) and member of Spain’s Consortium for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), said:

    “The study published in The Lancet Psychiatry represents a major advance in the treatment of resistant depression. Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) showed higher effectiveness compared to treatment as usual, even in patients who had not remitted after previous intensive interventions. The study methodology is robust, with a randomised, controlled design and 34-week follow-up, which supports the robustness of its conclusions.

    “This work provides conclusive evidence that MBCT can be an effective and cost-effective second-line treatment option in structured clinical settings. Although direct extrapolation to other health systems, such as the Spanish one, should be done with caution and requires further research, the model is scalable and compatible with primary mental health care. Its implementation could lead to a substantial improvement in the continuity of care for cases of difficult-to-treat depression.”

    ‘Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy versus treatment as usual after non-remission with NHS Talking Therapies high intensity psychological therapy for depression: a UK-based clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness randomised, controlled, superiority trial’ by Thorsten Barnhofer et al. was published in Lancet Psychiatry at 23:30 UK time on Wednesday 14th May. 

     

    Declared interests

    Maria Serra-Blasco:She declares that she has no conflicts of interest.

    Jesús Montero-Marín:“I am a member of the Oxford Mindfulness Centre and collaborate regularly with some of the papers’ authors.”

    For all other experts, no reply to our request for DOIs was received.

    MIL OSI United Kingdom –

    May 15, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Durbin Calls Out Republicans’ As Trump Administration Slashed Funding For Mental Health Grants, Gun Violence Prevention Efforts That Had Bipartisan Support

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Illinois Dick Durbin
    May 14, 2025
    “The next time the President or any of his friends go to Fox News and try to start scapegoating Democrats for the gun violence in Chicago, they should remember that the President and his billionaire cronies eliminated these successful, bipartisan grants,” Durbin said on the Senate floor
    WASHINGTON – In a speech on the Senate floor today, U.S. Senate Democratic Whip Dick Durbin (D-IL), Ranking Member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, spoke out against the Trump Administration’s cuts to critical mental health programs and gun violence prevention efforts.  Despite strong bipartisan support for the Bipartisan Safer Communities Act in 2022, congressional Republicans have remained silent about these disastrous funding cuts that erode efforts to mitigate gun violence.
    “Currently, the number one cause of death for American kids and teenagers is gun violence.  Not automobile accidents, not cancer.  We need to treat this crisis like the national emergency that it is,” Durbin began his remarks.  “Common-sense gun safety measures are overwhelmingly popular with the American people, even with gun owners, including banning high-capacity assault weapons meant for the battlefield, as well as universal background checks and requiring safe storage of guns.”
    “But we also know that making communities safer requires addressing the root causes of violence,” Durbin said.
    Durbin continued his remarks, reflecting on the third anniversary of the Robb Elementary School shooting in Uvalde, Texas, that resulted in the death of 19 innocent children and two teachers.
    “On what should have been an ordinary school day, 19 innocent children and two teachers were gunned down in their classrooms by a man armed with an AR-15.  After that horrific day, Congress came together on a bipartisan basis, a rare bipartisan basis, to pass the most significant gun safety reform in generations,” Durbin said.  “We recognized that too many parents were losing children, and too many communities have been irreparably scarred.”
    Durbin spoke about key components in the Bipartisan Safer Communities Act, including provisions that invested in breaking the cycle of violence by addressing mental health.
    “When Congress passed the Bipartisan Safer Communities Act, we agreed we must do more to prevent gun violence from happening in the first place.  One of the most prominent provisions of that legislation was Congress’ decision to invest in using trained neighborhood leaders to break the cycle of violence,” Durbin said.  “With $250 million in funding, we supported community violence interrupters from the South Side of Chicago to… Houston, Texas.”
    Yet, previous bipartisan support did not stop the Trump Administration and unelected billionaire Elon Musk from axing federal funding for these critical programs.  As a result of these cuts, organizations like Metropolitan Family Services in Chicago lost $3.7 million in federal funding.  Prior to being slashed, these funds provided mental health training and job skills to hundreds of individuals who are most likely to perpetrate or be victims of violence.  Because of these initiatives, homicides in the City of Chicago have decreased by 50 percent since 2021.
    “Unfortunately, DOGE had a different idea when it came to preventing violence.  Last month, the Department of Justice cancelled more than $800 million in violence prevention, public safety, and victim service grants.  That includes millions of dollars in community violence intervention funding that was senselessly cut,” Durbin continued.
    “Does Attorney General Bondi really think that eliminating these grants will stop the violence?  Ignoring reality won’t stop the bloodshed that will occur without these funds,” Durbin said.  “Does President Trump really think that cutting this funding makes America safer?”
    “The next time the President or any of his friends go to Fox News and try to start scapegoating Democrats for the gun violence in Chicago, they should remember that the President and his billionaire cronies eliminated these successful, bipartisan grants,” Durbin said.
    Further destroying the gun violence prevention efforts in the Bipartisan Safer Communities Act, the Trump Administration has also rescinded $1 billion in mental health grants from schools that were included in the bill. 
    “After any mass shooting, many are quick to explain away the tragedy as just a ‘mental health’ issue, not the result of the fact that America has far too many deadly weapons,” Durbin said.  “Yet barely 100 days into this Administration, they have dropped any pretense about mental health in dealing with gun violence.  Apparently, preventing gun violence by providing treatment to children is just too much for them to take.”
    Durbin concluded his remarks by pointing to an initiative in Illinois losing its federal funding without a clear justification from the Trump Administration.
    “An initiative in Lake County, Illinois, received nearly $6 million in federal funds to recruit and train mental health providers to work in the schools,” Durbin said.  “In an outrageous and unsubstantiated justification, the Department of Education claimed that these funds ‘violated the letter of purpose or Federal civil rights law’ or ‘undermined the well-being of students these programs are intended to help.’  There is no evidence of that.”
    “Where is the outrage from those who joined in this bipartisan response several years ago?  We took great pride in it.  Democrats and Republicans finally agreed on something.  Mental health counseling of children who are most vulnerable is a way to reduce gun violence.  I still believe that to this day. But the Trump Administration says ‘no, we’re not going to invest in that.’
    “You know what’s going to happen? There will be more gun violence… Innocent kids will die. Innocent people will die.  People will say, ‘well, we just need more mental health counseling.’  Keep in mind, this Administration just eliminated the funds for it. What are they thinking?” Durbin said.
    “Where is the outrage from my colleagues on the other side of the aisle?” Durbin asked.  “That silence is shameful.”
    Video of Durbin’s remarks on the Senate floor is available here.
    Audio of Durbin’s remarks on the Senate floor is available here.
    Footage of Durbin’s remarks on the Senate floor is available here for TV Stations.
    -30-

    MIL OSI USA News –

    May 15, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Brownley Introduces Legislation to Improve Federal Government Use of Renewable Energy Certificates

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Julia Brownley (D-CA)

    Washington, DC – Today, Congresswoman Julia Brownley (D-CA) reintroduced the Renewable Energy Certificate Study Act, legislation that directs the Government Accountability Office (GAO) to evaluate how federal agencies use Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs) and their efficacy in advancing our nation’s clean energy goals. While RECs, certifications that one megawatt-hour (MWh) of electricity was generated from a renewable source and delivered to the grid, have become a common tool for meeting renewable energy targets, there is still limited information on whether they are delivering real and measurable climate benefits. Brownley’s bill aims to provide Congress with the data needed to ensure that RECs are being used effectively, transparently, and in a way that maximizes environmental impact.

    “Renewable Energy Certificates were created to help expand and stimulate the growth of the green energy market. Currently, RECs offer federal agencies and other entities a flexible tool to meet statutory and administrative energy procurement requirements, helping reduce emissions without the complexities of procuring renewable energy directly,” said Congresswoman Brownley.

    “As the single largest energy user in the United States, the federal government has a responsibility to use RECs as intended. My bill calls for federal agencies to evaluate the effectiveness of RECs and assess the extent of their use across the federal government, which will provide Congress with critical data to improve federal energy policy.

    “My bill will ensure the wise and effective use of taxpayer funds, while also improving RECs market-wide and helping to build a stronger, more sustainable clean energy future.”

    Under requirements in the Energy Policy Act of 2005 and the Biden Administration’s Executive Order on Catalyzing Clean Energy Industries and Jobs Through Federal Sustainability, federal agencies have worked to increase the percentage of energy they procured from climate-friendly sources. To accomplish these goals, many federal agencies turned to RECs. However, research and reporting have raised concerns that RECs may not be meaningfully reducing emissions as intended. The Renewable Energy Certificate Study Act addresses these concerns by directing the GAO to analyze the effectiveness of RECs in advancing federal clean energy objectives.

    The text of the Renewable Energy Certificate Study Act can be found here.

    ###

    Issues: 119th Congress, Climate Crisis, Energy and Environment

    MIL OSI USA News –

    May 15, 2025
  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Launching the Auckland University of Technology Innovation Fund

    Source: NZ Music Month takes to the streets

    Tēnā koutou katoa,
    Thank you for inviting me to join you today. 
    Vice-Chancellor Damon Salesa, AUT Council Members, leadership, AUT Ventures staff and the start up community joining us here this morning – I appreciate your warm welcome. 
    It’s a real pleasure to help launch the AUT Innovation Fund.
    This fund is exactly the kind of initiative we want to see more of under the Government’s Going for Growth plan. New Zealand needs to back smart ideas, new technology, and the people behind them. That’s how we create better jobs, stronger businesses, and a more diverse economy.
    Our universities are central to this. They’re not just places of teaching and learning—they’re also where innovation happens. That’s why I’m pleased to see this fund focusing on turning research into real-world outcomes, including new companies, products, and services.
    It’s also good to see the fund supports sharing the benefits with researchers and students through intellectual property. When people know their ideas can go somewhere—and that they’ll be recognised and rewarded—it encourages creativity, ambition, and impact.
    AUT already has a track record in this space through AUT Ventures. It’s great to see that work now expanding, with new backing to support ideas like Spherelose and businesses like Conical. These are just some of the early examples of what’s possible.
    As Minister for Universities—and also for Science, Innovation and Technology—I see a big opportunity to better connect our universities with the wider research and business community. That’s why we’re making some of the biggest changes to our science system in 30 years. And we’re doing it in a way that recognises the vital role universities play.
    At the same time, we’re also updating the Tertiary Education Strategy—a roadmap for the future of our universities and vocational providers. It will set out the Government’s priorities for the sector and the changes we’d like to see over the next few years.
    We expect to focus on four main areas:

    Access and Participation – making sure people from all backgrounds can get the skills they need.
    Achievement – supporting students to complete their study and succeed afterwards.
    Impact and Innovation – making sure research and teaching support the economy and wider society.
    Integration and Collaboration – encouraging stronger links between universities, business, and other research groups.

    We’re also considering a fifth area: international partnerships, to grow our global connections.
    Early engagement is already underway, including with Universities New Zealand. Wider consultation will follow later this year.
    I know the changes underway in the sector are big. I want to acknowledge that. But small steps won’t deliver the kind of transformation New Zealand needs—especially in how we grow our economy and support our people.
    We’ve always had world-class ideas in this country. The challenge has been turning them into world-class outcomes that benefit New Zealanders. The AUT Innovation Fund is a practical step toward solving that challenge—taking great ideas and helping them go further.
    So, I want to thank AUT for stepping up, and I look forward to seeing what comes from this work.
    Ngā mihi nui, and all the best for the fund and its future success.

    MIL OSI New Zealand News –

    May 15, 2025
  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Launch of the Social Investment Fund

    Source: NZ Music Month takes to the streets

    Kia ora koutou katoa. Nau mai, haere mai, piki mai.  Ki te mihi atu ahau, ki ngā mana whenua nei, tenei te mihi i kaikarakia ko Riki Minhinnick, tēnā koutou, tēnā koutou, tēnā koutou katoa. 
    Thank you to the Southern Initiative for hosting us in Manukau today. 
    As many of you will know the Southern Initiative champions social and community innovation in south Auckland to drive real change for people in need. 
    There are many parallels with the work the Social Investment Agency is doing, and I’m delighted to be making today’s announcement here.
    I would also like to acknowledge the presence of Social Investment Board members Dr Graham Scott, David Woods and Mike Williams.
    Last year I told a story about Jack. It was not your classic Hollywood underdog story – maybe something closer to home, gritty and independent and without a cosy fairytale ending. 
    When we left Jack he was 22-years-old, had been arrested for assault and was heading to prison. His pregnant partner Danni and four-year-old son were living in a damp, overcrowded rental in South Auckland. He’d had frequent and extensive interactions with government services, which had not been successful in providing the intervention or support he needed to break the cycle. 
    Over successive decades and successive governments it’s become increasingly clear that despite billions of dollars being spent major barriers in the system are holding back change.
    The sad reality is that despite many good intentions, outcomes haven’t improved for many of our most vulnerable – people like Jack and his partner Danni – whose complex needs span multiple government portfolios. 
    Since we last talked about Jack, the Social Investment Agency has been developing a new social investment approach for better delivery of social services. 
    The Government currently funds a huge number of non-government organisations to deliver social services to improve the lives of vulnerable New Zealanders. But many of these providers are operating with one arm tied behind their backs because of a traditionally fragmented, short-term approach to contracting. 
    I’ve been told of providers juggling over 100 contracts with up to 17 different agencies – many of them renewed annually. That creates uncertainty, pushes up costs, and drives short-term thinking. 
    Contracts are often highly prescriptive, focused on easily measured inputs and outputs, rather than the outcomes that actually matter to peoples’ lives.
    Social providers report spending up to a third of their time on auditing and reporting, rather than working with the people they are supposed to be helping. 
    Those delivering services that span multiple government agencies often find their overall impact goes unrecognised. Each agency sees only the part that relates to its silo, missing the broader value of the work. As a result, effective, integrated community support is undervalued, and the people who need it most, like Jack and Danni, miss out.
    The people in this room know that New Zealanders like Jack and Danni require intensive and bespoke services, which are most effective when provided in their communities, not one-size-fits-all programmes driven by the organisational needs of Wellington bureaucracies.
    Social investment flips the model. It puts people – like Jack and his whānau – at the centre of social service delivery. 
    It means being clear about the outcomes we’re purchasing, who we’re targeting, and the data and evidence we’ll use to determine what is and isn’t working – and what we should, and shouldn’t, be funding.
    And it means partnering better with the organisations like many of you here today, who are best placed to help the likes of Jack, Danni and Jack Jr thrive – as long as Government will let you.
    SOCIAL INVESTMENT FUND
    To drive this change, today I am announcing that Budget 2025 allocates $275 million over the next four years to Vote Social Investment. 
    The centrepiece of the Social Investment Budget is a new $190 million Social Investment Fund, designed to change lives and tackle the very problems we’ve talked about – short-term contracts, siloed funding, and a lack of focus on outcomes. 
    In addition, the Social Investment Agency has been allocated: 

    $20 million for initiatives that strengthen parenting in the first 2000 days of a child’s life, reducing harm and setting children up for better long-term outcomes; and
    $25 million for initiatives to help prevent children and vulnerable adults from entering state care, as part of the Crown’s response to the Royal Commission of Inquiry into Historical Abuse in State Care.

     
    The hero of today’s announcement is the Social Investment Fund. 
    It will invest in services that deliver measurable improvements in the lives of those who need our help, guided by data and evidence. It will support both new approaches and strengthen existing services that work. 
    Each investment will have robust evaluation built in from the start, so Government can track the Fund’s impact and invest taxpayer money with confidence.
    The Fund is expected to invest in at least 20 initiatives over the next year.  
    Today, I’m pleased to announce the first three initiatives which demonstrate how the Fund will work in practice:
    The first is an Autism NZ initiative to each year help 50 families of young children who are autistic or showing signs of autism by intervening early so that families, teachers, and other professionals, are better able to help these young people to thrive at school.
    The second extends to another 80 families an evidence-based Emerge Aotearoa programme that has been proven to reduce youth offending and truancy.
    The third is He Piringa Whare, an expanded programme delivered by Te Tihi o Ruahine, an alliance of nine hapū, iwi, Māori organisations, partners and providers with a track record of using data and evidence to shape its services.
    The He Piringa Whare programme will support over 130 families at a time to live in warm, dry homes, engage them in education, training and employment and support whānau to live in relationships that are free from violence.
    All three of these initiatives have established expertise, but all have historically struggled to secure funding for their services because the outcomes span multiple government agencies. 
    My goal is that the Government’s new approach will help us prove the return on these investments so we can scale them up over time.
    But what might the work of the Social Investment Fund actually mean for someone like Jack and Danni?
    It could mean a coordinated response from Te Tihi: support for Jack as he reintegrates into his community after prison, parenting programmes for him and Danni, smoking interventions while Danni is pregnant; tailored housing support; and education and health services wrapped around their young family.
    Not a patchwork of agencies working in silos, and providers cobbling together piecemeal funding and contracts.
    It means a dedicated support worker who knows their whānau and a stable home for Jack, Danni, and their children.
    It means early identification of autism for Jack Jr, when his Plunket nurse sees early signs of autism and refers him to Autism NZ.
    Autism NZ, in turn, could provide Jack’s whānau with tools to better understand his needs and get him ready for school, provide access to the learning support his father would likely have benefited from and didn’t get, and on-going support for the whole family, setting the foundation for long-term success. 
    We’re not talking about waving a magic wand, applying a quick fix or simply servicing misery. This is about investing in smart, targeted early interventions that not only make a difference in the lives of Jack and his whānau, but mean the Government reduces the money it might otherwise have spent on treating the symptoms rather than the cause of dysfunction – be it at the crisis end of the justice or health systems or government provided income support. 
    Maybe if Jack had received something like Emerge’s services as a youth, things wouldn’t have progressed to where he was heading to prison. Its Multi-Systemic Therapy programme has seen at least 80 per cent of the young people it works with engaged in education or work with no new arrests. 
    The Social Investment Fund is starting small but I see potential for it to achieve significant scale over time. 
    Government agencies currently spend about $7 billion each year buying social services designed to improved lives from non-government agencies. 
    In the years ahead we want to see more of this funding and more of these contracts transferred into the Social Investment Fund. 
    We will work with providers and communities who want to consolidate their multiple government contracts into one genuinely outcomes-based contract. 
    The Government is also open to the pooling of social sector funding from multiple government budgets into a single fund under local decision-making. We often hear local leaders saying that they could do a better job of investing in outcomes than multiple government agencies and we want to hear from you how we can make that work.
    We’re also creating the opportunity for future co-investment opportunities with the philanthropic and private sector. 
    The Social Investment Fund is a rejection of the failed approaches of the past. It’s being set up as a totally new way of working with you, the people who know Jack and Danni best and who are best placed to impact their lives for the better. I see it as a force for enduring change that will survive changes of Government.
    Because Jack doesn’t care that the providers that have been in contact with him have been doing it hard. He doesn’t know that they scrounge and scrape to get by, managing dozens of contracts with agencies, getting endlessly audited and reporting back on every minor detail.  
    A central fund with a clear mandate gives us the best chance of working with those outside of government to improve the lives of the most vulnerable New Zealanders.  
    SOCIAL INVESTMENT ACROSS GOVERNMENT
    The Social Investment Agency also has a wider leadership role. It’s purpose is to demonstrate and accelerate change that ensures all government agencies invest more effectively to deliver better outcomes for New Zealanders.
    It is building tools, infrastructure and methods that both government agencies and the wider social sector can use. That includes better ways to track progress, measure outcomes and understand what’s actually working. 
    This will also improve the way the Government delivers mainstream social services in health, education and other areas.
    For example, the Government invests billions of dollars in education every year, but the returns – in terms of literacy, school attendance, and long-term outcomes – are not where they should be. 
    We know that many kids with additional needs struggle throughout their time at school. We also know that if we intervened earlier to help them they’d be capable of achieving a whole lot more. 
    This is a prime area for applying a social investment approach – targeting resources earlier, backing what works, and ensuring that spending leads to better outcomes later in life. 
    If we get it right early, we reduce the need for far more expensive interventions down the track.  You can expect to see that thinking heroed in this year’s Education Budget. And I’m looking forward to saying more about it next week. 
    It’s not just about education. We want every government agency to be asking: how can we invest smarter? How do we make sure out spending is improving lives, not just funding activity?
    That means being open to innovation – and by that I mean being open to, and enabling, new approaches to existing challenges. We need to recognise that the overly risk-averse approach traditionally taken by government agencies has not shifted the dial – especially for families with high and complex needs or intergenerational issues. 
    We also know that innovation is happening outside of the Wellington system – in spite of the barriers government can put up. We want to back communities and non-government organisations who show insight in their use of data and evidence, who are willing to innovate and to clearly evaluate what’s working and what’s not working. 
    It’s about constant improvement. We want to see data used to constantly measure the progress being made and to identify how we can do better together. 
    Data, evidence and infrastructure form the backbone of the social investment approach. Together, they provide for safe and secure data sharing that enables the Government to understand where it should focus its efforts. They also enable providers to understand their impact and what else they need to do.
    A key goal for the Social Investment Agency is to reduce the amount of reporting and data being sought by government agencies from providers. 
    We recognise that the amount of meaningless information presently sought by agencies can be burdensome for NGOs and often adds very little value relative to the work required to provide it. 
    Social investment contracts will be designed to reduce the amount of data being required while improving our insights about what actually has impact.
    SPEND TO SAVE
    Social investment not only improves lives, it also frees up resources for investment in other priorities. 
    When we invest even relatively small amounts in the right places, that can lead to bigger and better impacts – both socially and fiscally. 
    Our Government is willing to make investments up front to drive durable savings down the line. 
    We’re starting to shift how this logic is reflected in the Budget process — recognising that not all spending is a cost. Some spending is investment that provides a social and financial return over the longer-term. And when it’s well-targeted and backed by evidence, it pays for itself many times over.
    We’ve already put this theory into action. 
    In December 2023, over 3,100 households were living in emergency housing motels – often for months at a time and at one point costing the country around a million dollars a day. Some of these motels became long-term living arrangements for families with young children. It was one of the most visible policy failures in recent memory – unsustainable, expensive, and harmful to the people stuck in the system.
    So we changed approach. We made families with children a priority for social housing. We made an upfront investment of $80m and we worked across agencies to support people into stable housing – including private rentals.
    The result was that by December 2024, the number of households in emergency housing motels dropped to 591 – a 75% reduction in just 12 months, and five years ahead of the target we set on coming into office. 
    This is not just a huge social success for the thousands of families now raising their children in proper homes. It’s also a huge success for the taxpayer – with savings of nearly $1.35 billion forecast over the next four years. That’s hundreds of millions of dollars that would have been spent on motel bills instead being reinvested back into social services, education, and health.
    Budget 2025 builds on this approach. It includes further initiatives where smart, early investment is expected to generate real savings, including in areas like employment, where helping someone into work today not only improves that person’s life prospects, but lead to savings for the taxpayer. 
    This is how our Government will build a social system that’s more effective, more sustainable, and that replaces heavy-handed bureaucracy with real results. 
    CONCLUSION
    Fast forward ten years. On this trajectory, we expect to see Jack, Danni and their children thriving, living in a home full of hope, not hardship. 
    Jack and Danni have been able to give their children stability they themselves haven’t had. With parenting programmes and community support, they have a confidence and a sense of belonging brought about by interventions that were targeted, holistic, and locally-driven.
    We’re looking forward to seeing communities drive the change we want to see. We know that real change will come from the leadership of people like those in this room, not policy advisors on the Terrace.
    Today’s Budget announcement is a big step forward. Over the next few years, I expect to see significant amounts of funding transferred to the Social Investment Fund, which will enable providers to work holistically and flexibly to improve people’s lives.
    Our Government believes in the potential of every person growing up in this country.
    Because every New Zealander deserves the chance to live in a home full of hope, not hardship. That’s the vision for social investment and I’m looking forward to working with you to make it happen. 

    MIL OSI New Zealand News –

    May 15, 2025
  • MIL-Evening Report: Can we confront cancel culture by finding common ground between moderate leftists and ‘wokists’?

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Hugh Breakey, Deputy Director, Institute for Ethics, Governance & Law, Griffith University

    A.C. Grayling’s new book Discriminations: Making Peace in the Culture Wars sees the renowned philosopher wading into the ethical minefields of “woke” activism, cancellation, and conservative backlash.

    Filled with thoughtful analysis, deep reflection, and fascinating historical detail, Discriminations argues the differences between leftist moderates and “woke activists” centrally concern means rather than ends.


    Review: Discriminations: Making Peace in the Culture Wars (Oneworld Publications)


    The book’s core contribution lies in Grayling’s searching examination of “othering”. This allows him to explain the core ethical concern about racism and sexism while simultaneously providing a principled basis to resist the more intolerant strategies that might be used in the struggle against such evils.

    Defining ‘woke’

    “Woke” and “wokist” now have pejorative implications and are terms used mainly by critics of progressive views. Grayling defines “wokism” in terms of the passionate advocacy of things like:

    • Critical Race Theory in history classes

    • Campaigning for same-sex marriage

    • Educating about diversity in sexuality

    • Supporting medical gender transition

    • Advocating changes in language use, such as with non-gendered pronouns

    • Encouraging Me Too avowals.

    A significant number of identity politics activists, he adds, “promote no-platforming and cancellation as weapons in the struggle”.

    This last point is critical in the way Grayling pictures the differences between moderate leftists like himself and “woke activists”. After all, the bulleted list above – apart perhaps from the reference to Critical Race Theory – includes many concerns broadly shared across the political left.


    Goodreads

    For Grayling, the differences between moderates and activists are mainly ones of strategies they employ to achieve their shared social justice goals.

    Through their justifiable anger at systemic injustice, he argues, some “woke activists” have been drawn into employing weapons like no-platforming and cancellation. These tactics can sometimes be morally mistaken, especially when driven by online mobs.

    Grayling worries that the use of these practices can “other” their targets, without any attempt at due process and constraints of proportionality.

    A contrasting view?

    Discriminations stands in stark contrast to another recent work on wokism: Yascha Mounk’s The Identity Trap. Like Grayling, Mounk is a moderate leftist. Like Grayling, he is critical of woke activism. But that is where their similarities end.

    For Mounk, wokism is not a continuation of traditional leftist civil rights struggles but a sharp deviation from them. On this view, wokism (which Mounk calls “the identity synthesis”) differs from liberal progressivism not merely in means but fundamentally in ends.

    Mounk sees wokism as committed to three foundational claims: the world must be understood through the prism of identities like sex, race and gender; supposedly universal rules merely serve to obscure how privileged groups dominate marginalised groups; and a just society requires norms and laws that explicitly treat (and require citizens to treat) different identity groups differently.

    None of these are claims about means; they concern fundamental values and goals. For Mounk, woke intolerance – in the form of cancellation and no-platforming – is a feature, not a bug. In contrast, Grayling sees online cancellations (when they go wrong) as a betrayal of the traditional leftist values he shares with the woke activists.

    Cancelling

    Grayling understands cancelling as efforts to “deprive opponents not only of a platform to state their views, but to deprive the persons and groups themselves of a presence.” This can include social ostracism and getting people fired.

    Discriminations contains no detailed discussions of contemporary cases of cancellation and their impacts. This is deliberate. Grayling worries that discussing current cases might invite an automatic identification with the cancelled target. Alternatively, it might counter-productively draw attention to victims who have already been excessively targeted.

    Granting these points, the absence of any case studies carries costs. For one thing, it’s never shown in the book that these objectionable practices are widespread enough to warrant a movement against them.

    Equally, there is no appeal to the reader’s sympathies by examining cases of cancellation through social media pile-ons and the human costs involved. Unless the reader already believes these practices to be widespread and harmful, they are unlikely to see what all the fuss is about.

    Without examination of actual cases, it also can be hard to know exactly what Grayling is recommending. Grayling believes cancelling is often justified. However, he wants to make clear the serious problems it creates in the cases where it is not justified.

    The problem is that different readers, interpreting some of his terms differently, might be led to see an act of cancellation as justified accountability where another reader would see objectionable mob justice.

    ‘Othering’

    Grayling defines “othering” as

    the practice of treating individuals and groups, typically on the basis of stereotyping and prejudice, as a ground for discriminating against them; and discrimination involves exclusion.

    Othering occurs any time one group of people decides they are different to another group (which they see as the “other”), thus treating that group in a morally different and worse way.

    Racism and sexism are examples of othering and “exclusion”. Grayling argues the goal of social justice is necessarily opposed to all such othering, especially if the exclusion is done without proportionality and safeguards, like due process. (Grayling allows that criminal punishment can be a type of justified othering.)

    Crucially, Grayling argues that acts of cancellation and no-platforming are instances of othering. These practices explicitly involve attempted punishment, shaming and ostracism and often occur without due process.

    Suppose you are a progressive activist concerned about the injustices of systemic racism and sexism. You might have strategic reasons that constrain the methods you use in fighting those injustices. However, your concerns with racism and sexism will generally not themselves restrain the methods you use.

    But suppose now you accept Grayling’s argument that the root social justice concern is not with racism or sexism specifically, but rather with the more fundamental injustices of othering and exclusion. Because cancelling and no-platforming are themselves instances of such things, you now have a deeply held reason not to cancel others (except perhaps in the most compelling cases). You do not want to become the very thing you are fighting against.

    Should we accept Grayling’s argument? There are some worries his notions of othering and exclusion are over-broad, given they capture commonplace practices like national borders and criminal justice punishments.

    Overall though, Grayling shows through his historical discussions that political othering for ideological or doctrinal reasons has caused enormous injustices and even horrifying slaughters.

    It turns out that political and ideological intolerance – Grayling recounts religious massacres and China’s Cultural Revolution – has a history every bit as awful as racially motivated massacres like the Holocaust. As he sombrely concludes: “tragedy attends entrenched positions that make mutual comprehension impossible”.

    Grayling stresses it is right to feel anger at the world’s injustices. But a wariness of being drawn into othering should incline us towards what he terms “Aristotle’s Principle”: to be “angry with the right person, in the right degree, at the right time, for the right purpose”.

    Rights versus interests

    Grayling adopts a human-rights-based approach as his moral compass, seeing it as a system that can transcend different cultures and parochial outlooks. He endorses the provisions of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights – importantly including the right to free speech.

    Cancelling can impinge on people’s free speech rights. As well as being wrong in itself, Grayling emphasises it’s also a strategic mistake. Activism itself requires free speech and it is unwise to “gift the high moral ground on free speech” to one’s political opponents. (That said, the political right in the United States is currently showing itself to be no friend of free speech either.)

    Grayling distinguishes rights and interests. He argues, “no exercise of any right can deny the fundamental rights of others.” Too often, he insists, figures on both sides of politics interpret their opponents as violating their rights when the opponents are just impacting on their interests.

    Grayling is surely correct that all sides of politics could benefit from seriously thinking through the differences between rights and interests. Setting back someone’s interests is not the same as violating their rights. Interests are inevitably in conflict and always require negotiation and compromise.

    Still, there remains something of an elephant in the room. What if an opponent’s words or actions don’t violate anyone’s rights, but nevertheless plausibly contribute to a world where such violations are more likely?

    Arguably, the problem of political intolerance isn’t driven by a conflation of rights with interests, but instead the ease with which any attack on a group’s interests can be represented as an indirect attack on their rights.

    Does Grayling get ‘woke’ right?

    It is a hard task to define an amorphous, contested and evolving concept like “wokism”. Grayling’s definition seems to map reasonably onto the original idea of being “woke to” (that is, newly aware of) structural racism and other inequities.

    John McWhorter.
    Columbia University

    But as Grayling himself observes, “woke” is now more commonly used as a pejorative term. The linguist John McWhorter argues the term has evolved from describing those with a leftist political awareness to referring to “those who believe anyone who lacks that enlightenment should be punished, shunned or ridiculed.”

    This is very different from Grayling’s understanding of the term. Most of the attributes Grayling ascribes to “the woke” are standard leftist positions. Worryingly, this sometimes seems to prevent him from engaging seriously with what many of the “woke” actually say and believe.

    For example, Grayling reflects on those who say that wokist social justice has been strongly influenced by postmodernism. Postmodernism includes the denial of things like “objective truth” and “factual knowledge” on the basis that these are constructs of power and discourse.

    But Grayling finds this confusing. After all, postmodernism seems to undercut the objective values of equality and social justice. He concludes:

    What this suggests is that those who begin with the postmodern analysis of objectivity and knowledge are not actually saying that there are no such things, but that how they have been constituted in the past should be replaced by new and better conceptions of them.

    This is simply not what the postmodernists are saying. The worry here is that Grayling takes it upon himself to stipulate what another school of thought is “actually” saying, rather than listening carefully to their ideas and arguments, and being open to the possibility that these may differ profoundly from his own.

    Given the book aims to persuade the woke activists he thinks are going too far in cancelling others, the possibility Grayling is misreading their actual position is a concerning one.

    Throughout, he appeals to the importance of democracy, free speech, human rights, the rule of law and due process, and the Enlightenment. He argues from what he sees as empirical evidence and “common knowledge”. But all these notions are wide open for criticism (from the woke perspective) that they are inventions of racist, patriarchal, and colonialist systems of oppression.

    As such, Grayling’s arguments may fall flat for the very group he is trying to persuade because he does not take their beliefs seriously enough to engage directly and critically with them.

    So who is right? Is Grayling correct that woke activists are just like him, except they have been led by their shared passions for social justice to indulge in often counter-productive and mistaken strategies of cancellation? Or is Yascha Mounk correct? Is wokism a profound departure from traditional leftist social justice goals?

    Perhaps time will tell.

    Hugh Breakey does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    – ref. Can we confront cancel culture by finding common ground between moderate leftists and ‘wokists’? – https://theconversation.com/can-we-confront-cancel-culture-by-finding-common-ground-between-moderate-leftists-and-wokists-254571

    MIL OSI Analysis – EveningReport.nz –

    May 15, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Canada: Judicial appointments increase Albertans access to court

    Albertans deserve to have access to a fair, accessible and transparent justice system. To increase capacity in the courts and improve access to justice for those involved in civil, criminal and family matters, Alberta’s government has made five new judicial appointments to the Alberta Court of Justice.

    “Continuing to fill judicial appointments directly strengthens the capacity of our courts, helping ensure Albertans have timely access to justice. Those newly appointed will serve Albertans well in their respective divisions and I congratulate them on their new roles.”

    Mickey Amery, Minister of Justice and Attorney General

    Alberta’s government has appointed the following individuals to the Alberta Court of Justice:

    • Tracey Bailey, KC, Edmonton Family and Youth Division, effective June 23.
    • Sheri Epp, Calgary Criminal Division and Calgary Region, effective June 2.
    • Karen McGowan, Edmonton Family and Youth Division, effective June 2.
    • Alicia Wendel, Edmonton Region, effective June 2.
    • Colin Wetter, part-time justice of the peace in Edmonton, effective May 14.

    “The Alberta Court of Justice is pleased to welcome and congratulate these new appointments. Access to justice is a fundamental value of our society, ensuring that every individual has the opportunity to be heard, receive fair treatment, and obtain timely, meaningful resolution to their legal challenges. I am confident that their backgrounds and experience will serve Albertans well in achieving these goals.”

    James Hunter, chief justice, Alberta Court of Justice

    Since June 2023, Alberta’s government has made 30 judicial appointments.

    Tracey M. Bailey, KC, received her bachelor of laws degree from the University of Alberta in 1991. She started her career as an articling student, continuing as a lawyer at Milner Fenerty. Following academia, she practiced law at Alberta’s Ministry of Justice and Solicitor General before returning to private practice in 2020 as associate counsel at Miller Thomson, LLP, where Ms. Bailey was made partner in 2025.

    Sheri Epp received her bachelor of laws degree from the University of Alberta in 1997. She began her career as an articling student, and then as a litigation associate at Code Hunter Wittmann/Gowlings. She then gained litigation experience at Code Hunter LLP, Scott Hall LLP, McCarthy Tetrault LLP, and Talisman Energy Inc. Most recently, Ms. Epp was senior counsel, then became assistant vice-president and associate chief counsel of Individual Insurance and Affinity at Manulife.

    Karen McGowan received her bachelor of laws degree from the University of Alberta in 1998. Her focus has always been criminal law, beginning as an articling student at Beresh, Depoe, Cunningham. Since being called to the bar in 1999, she has practiced law for Legal Aid Alberta in the Youth Criminal Defence Office, then as a senior advisory counsel, and finally, in the Criminal Trial Group.

    Alicia Wendel received her bachelor of laws degree from Dalhousie University in 1999. She started her career as an articling student at McAllister and Sinclair, then as a barrister at Fix and Smith. From 2001 to present, she has been a Crown prosecutor in rural jurisdictions, practicing in regional courts with the Alberta Crown Prosecution Service. Currently, Ms. Wendel is a member of the Alberta Justice Restorative Justice Working Group, the Alberta Justice Sexual Violence Working Group, and the Gladue Systemic Change Project Committee.

    Colin Wetter received his bachelor of laws degree from the University of Alberta in 1986. He began his career as an articling student at Howard Mackie in Calgary, then practiced law in the private sector until 1992. He then joined the federal Department of Justice as legal counsel, and –with ever-increasing roles of responsibility – in 2012 became regional director of the Aboriginal Law Services Section (Alberta). Mr. Wetter was regional director of the Tax Law Services Section (Prairie Region) from 2019 to 2022.

    Quick facts

    • Lawyers with at least 10 years at the bar can apply to become a justice with the Alberta Court of Justice. 
    • Lawyers with at least five years at the bar can apply to become a justice of the peace. Justice of the peace appointments are for 10 years.
    • Applications are reviewed by the Alberta Judicial Council and Alberta Judicial Nominating Committee, and then recommended to the minister of justice and cabinet for appointment.

    Related information

    • Alberta’s government is actively recruiting justices and justices of the peace and encourages qualified lawyers to apply. Qualified lawyers who wish to be considered for appointment can access the application form online.

     Related news

    • Ensuring access to justice for Albertans (May 7, 2025)
    • Judicial appointments increase Albertans access to justice (April 9, 2025)
    • Increasing court capacity (Jan. 15, 2025)
    • Strengthening Alberta’s courts (Dec. 4, 2024)

    MIL OSI Canada News –

    May 15, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: The Make America Sick Agenda: Senator Markey Compiles Stories from Trump, RFK Jr.’s First Five Months

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Massachusetts Ed Markey
    Read stories from Massachusetts and across the country
    Washington (May 14, 2025) – Senator Edward J. Markey (D-Mass.), top Democrat on the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Subcommittee on Primary Health and Retirement Security, today unveiled a selection of dozens of stories received by his office on Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy (RFK) Jr.’s first five months. The stories, titled “The Make America Sick Agenda,” contains stories from people who have shared their experiences under the Trump administration’s Health and Human Services, including the impacts of cutting billions in life-saving research into diseases like Alzheimer’s and cancer, revoking grants to hospitals and community health centers, and firing staff dedicated to helping families pay their utility bills. All the while, RFK, Jr. spreads misinformation about vaccines amidst an uncontrolled measles outbreak.
    “The stories included here are from the voices of people across the country who the Trump administration has betrayed. They are terrified of losing life-saving care. They are angry that their government would treat them this way. And they are frustrated that protecting billionaires is more important to the Administration than ensuring their ability to get the care they need, when they need it, without going into debt,” wrote Senator Markey. “These are the stories of the Trump administration’s Make America Sick Agenda. The American people deserve better.”
    Selected excerpts from the compilation:
    “My parents were the first generation in their families to go to college and I was a Pell Grant recipient. I am not from an ‘elite’ upbringing. I am a mother, a pediatrician and public health professor have dedicated my career to trying to address the health disadvantages accrued by people in lower income and otherwise socially disadvantaged and stigmatized populations with a specific focus on women and children. One of my NIH grants that sought to understand and improve the experiences in behavioral/mental health care of LGBTQIA+ youth ages 14-17 was terminated. The message sent is that these vulnerable youth do not matter, further making them feel unwelcome in this society. It also has had a chilling effect on my students and staff who are funded through this research, discouraging them from continuing to be part of the workforce trying to understand and make better the care and opportunities for those whom our societal decisions have disadvantaged for reasons that are beyond their control.” – Anonymous, Amherst, MA 
    “I have kidney cancer. As an active patient receiving extremely expensive immunotherapy treatment, if I lose my job, I’ll also lose health insurance. That is literally a death sentence.” – Joe, Bridgewater, MA 
    “I am a stage 4 cancer patient at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and am currently enrolled in a clinical trial there. I have a rare cancer that has no cure and few drugs to treat it. In the past 20 years, clinical trials and research about my cancer have been instrumental in helping people live longer. Cuts to the NIH and cancer research are devastating to cancer patients. Cuts to vaccine research also indirectly affect cancer patients as we are typically immunocompromised and need vaccines and for the population around us to be vaccinated. Anti-vaccine sentiments from HHS and the CDC could be detrimental to cancer patients like myself.” – Jennifer, Shrewsbury, MA
    “These drastic cuts aren’t just going to devastate local jobs and people’s livelihoods and a generation of scientists. They’re rapidly destroying the infrastructure for scientific research in this country, and that’s going to have very real effects on the public’s health. The treatment and prevention advances we need for ourselves and our loved ones just won’t be there. I cannot overstate how critical it is that we act NOW. The scientific research infrastructure is far easier to break than it will be to rebuild.” – Julia, Newton, MA
    “It is a sad commentary, that in a high-income country such as the US, we lagged behind other similar high-income countries in all healthcare indicators and now we are jeopardizing the even further the health of all Americans and our scientific reputation in the world. There is always room for improved organization and being efficient with our taxpayer monies but the restructuring that is taking place is without any reasonable justification based on evidence and thus, lacks in transparency to the American people. The future of all Americans is at risk here and the damage being done to the health of our people and the education system as well as our scientific innovation is devastating. We must push back.” – Anonymous, East Longmeadow, MA

    MIL OSI USA News –

    May 15, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: At Spotlight Forum, Warren Slams Trump, McMahon’s Attacks on Public Education, Invites Americans to Share Stories for Meeting with McMahon

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Massachusetts – Elizabeth Warren

    May 14, 2025

    Warren: “At a time when college costs are already too high—when the American Dream is out of reach for too many—President Trump and Congressional Republicans are making it harder for working-class families to get ahead.”

    Forum Livestream

    Washington, D.C. – U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Ranking Member of the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs (BHUA), delivered opening remarks at a spotlight forum entitled “Stealing the American Dream: How Trump and Republicans Are Raising Education Costs for Families.” 

    Senator Warren, in her opening statement, slammed President Trump and Education Secretary Linda McMahon’s reckless actions to dismantle the Department of Education, which will make it harder and more expensive for working- and middle-class kids to receive an education. She also highlighted how Trump’s “big, beautiful bill” will slash $351 billion in education funding, harming students and borrowers to pay for tax cuts for millionaires, billionaires, and wealthy corporations.

    Senator Warren invited Education Secretary Linda McMahon to testify at today’s hearing to defend the Trump administration’s actions to dismantle public education, including her decision to take Social Security benefits away from seniors with defaulted student loan debt. Secretary McMahon declined Senator Warren’s invitation and asked to meet with Senator Warren instead. Senator Warren closed by asking Americans to share their stories and questions for her to bring to her meeting with Secretary McMahon.

    Opening Statement
    Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee Spotlight Forum: Stealing the American Dream: How Trump and Republicans Are Raising Education Costs for Families.
    May 14, 2025
    As Prepared for Delivery

    Senator Elizabeth Warren: Last month, in the face of an unprecedented attack on public education led by co-Presidents Donald Trump and Elon Musk, I launched the Save Our Schools campaign.

    Trump, Musk, and Education Secretary Linda McMahon are determined to make it harder and more expensive for working- and middle-class kids to get an education. Republicans in Congress are piling on as well. 

    So let me be clear: I will fight for public education and for all the kids, parents, teachers, grandparents and more who want better lives for themselves and the people they love. 

    That’s why I’m holding today’s forum called “Stealing the American Dream: How Trump and Republicans Are Raising Education Costs for Families.”

    At a time when college costs are already too high—when the American Dream is out of reach for too many—President Trump and Congressional Republicans are making it harder for working-class families to get ahead.

    First, they want to eliminate the Department of Education. That’s the agency that gives millions of students a chance to go to college when their families can’t just write a check for the sticker price. It’s also the agency charged with protecting students and borrowers from bad actors like shady student loan servicers and predatory for-profit colleges.

    To be clear, the money we invest in post-high school education isn’t charity. This is an investment in our people so they can get good jobs, start businesses, and help grow our economy.

    But Donald Trump has already fired half of the federal workers who help make these investments. He’s also signed an executive order to try to get rid of the Education Department altogether. And to top it off, he’s trying to dismantle the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, taking another cop off the beat for student loan borrowers.

    And if you thought we could count on Republicans in Congress to stop this madness, think again. Nope. They are making things worse—much worse. 

    Last month, House Republicans advanced a bill to make higher education even more expensive for American families. Why? So they can pay for tax cuts for millionaires and billionaires. 

    Their bill would increase monthly student loan payments. 

    It would trap borrowers with student loan debt for even longer. 

    It would make it harder to get Pell Grants.

    It would end rules that protect students from bad schools and greedy for-profit colleges that rip them off.

    Who benefits from putting all these costs on people whose only sin is to try to get an education? Only President Trump’s billionaire and millionaire friends. They want to cut these education investments and use the money to stuff their pockets with tax giveaways. 

    Adding insult to injury? Now, they’re going after people’s Social Security checks too. We’ve already seen the Trump Administration work to gut Social Security, which Elon Musk calls a Ponzi scheme. President Trump has let DOGE run rampant at the Social Security Administration, laying off employees and closing field offices.

    Last month, the Trump Administration announced the next phase in their plans. They are getting ready to hold back Social Security checks from student loan borrowers that are in default on decades-old student loans. Almost half a million seniors could lose their Social Security benefits.

    So, I want to thank our witnesses for joining us today and helping to educate us on how these Trump policies would hurt American families.

    And I want to point out who is not here: the Secretary of Education, Linda McMahon. I invited her to join today because she has a lot to answer for. The questions are pretty straightforward:

    Why is the Secretary of Education jacking up costs for middle-class kids trying to go to college?

    Why is the Secretary of Education firing the staff who protect students from scammers?

    Why is the Secretary of Education taking away Social Security benefits from tens of thousands of seniors with student debt?

    Secretary McMahon refused to answer those questions in front of the American people. Instead, she asked for a meeting. I’m happy to sit down with her. But if Secretary McMahon won’t face parents, teachers, and students who have been hurt by her reckless actions, I’m bringing their stories straight to her. So, today I’m asking everyone to share their stories. Please send them to our Save Our Schools campaign, because there is power in sharing our stories and there is power in fighting back. That is why we are here today.

    MIL OSI USA News –

    May 15, 2025
  • MIL-Evening Report: Justice on demand? The true crime podcasts serving up Erin Patterson’s mushroom murder trial

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Kate Cantrell, Senior Lecturer – Writing, Editing, and Publishing, University of Southern Queensland

    The trial of the so-called “mushroom cook” Erin Patterson, currently underway in the Victorian town of Morwell, continues to generate global attention.

    The mother of two is charged with three counts of murder and one count of attempted murder, all of which she denies.

    Due to the regional location of the hearing and Australia’s conservative attitude toward the use of cameras in the courtroom, many people are following the case via podcast. This is not surprising, given Australia has among the world’s highest percentage of podcast consumers.

    Currently Apple Australia’s Top 10 True Crime podcast chart includes three network-backed podcasts dedicated to the mushroom case. They essentially present the same information, but through different formats and structures, and to varying degrees of success.

    Unlike cold case investigations, which are retrospectives that focus on breakdowns in the legal system, real-time true crime podcasts unpack complex issues and provide information to listeners while a case is under judgement.

    Death cap dinner claims recapped

    Prosecutors allege in July 2023 Erin Patterson laced four beef wellingtons with death cap mushrooms and served the deadly lunch to her parents-in-law, Don and Gail Patterson; Gail’s sister, Heather Wilkinson; and her husband, Ian Wilkinson. But the defence has raised doubts about those claims.

    The trial, now in its third week, has captured the nation. The jury has heard from Erin’s children, along with Facebook friends and the sole surviving guest Ian Wilkinson, a pastor who spent almost two months in hospital following the lunch.

    Justice on demand

    In Australia, the principle of open justice – that justice should not only be done, but be seen to be done – is a cornerstone of the legal system. This includes making fair and accurate reports of judicial proceedings, and ensuring court information is accessible to the media and public.

    New media forms, such as podcasts, also depend on democracy and accessibility. Anyone can speak and anyone can listen, anywhere, at any time. So true crime podcasts have naturally (and sometimes problematically) converged with the process of open justice.

    Take The Australian’s 2018 podcast The Teacher’s Pet, which followed the controversial investigation of the disappearance of Lynette Dawson from the northern beaches of Sydney in 1982. It marked the first time in Australian legal history that a serialised podcast was cited as the primary reason for an application for a permanent stay of proceedings.

    While the permanent stay was denied, the court did grant a temporary stay for nine months. At the hearing, Justice Elizabeth Fullerton called the podcast “the most egregious example of media interference with a criminal trial process”. She described it as “overzealous”, “uncensored” and “imbued with hubris”.

    But there are some key differences between The Teacher’s Pet and the new mushroom case podcasts.

    The Teacher’s Pet resurrected a cold case, and uses investigative journalism to propel interest in the real-time solving of the case, with listeners’ help. This process, known as jurification, positions the podcast host as a journalist-turned-investigator, and the listeners as jurors weighing up the evidence.

    In contrast, the podcasts on the Patterson case largely rely on objective reporting to build on listeners’ understanding of the context that led to the tragic deaths of three people. These podcasts include no explicit judgement of evidence. And this allows them to skirt the potential for “trial by media”.

    The Mushroom Case Daily

    One of the most popular podcasts tracking the Patterson case is the ABC’s Mushroom Case Daily.

    As the top-ranked podcast in Australia’s Apple charts at the time of writing, the Daily provides digestible summaries of key moments in the trial, with court reporter Kristian Silva and producer Stephen Stockwell (Stocky) recording daily from a makeshift studio in Morwell.

    As the first podcast of its kind in the market (starting in March 2024), the Daily is informative and engaging, but not sensationalist or self-serving. It reports on the facts, but does not shy away from empathetic identification with the victims – helping the audience feel involved in the story.

    Interestingly, the Daily even builds empathy for Patterson herself. It humanises the accused by reporting on her emotional displays, and by seeking to understand her actions and reactions, rather than merely vilifying her.

    The Daily also refuses to speculate about whether Patterson is guilty or not, as do its competitors. In doing so, it upholds the legal and ethical obligation of court reporters to maintain impartiality and not misinterpret or misrepresent information.

    At the same time, it is one of the more intimate accounts of the trial, with a relaxed and conversational style. It’s also more interactive than its rivals, as listeners are encouraged to write in with questions.

    The Mushroom Cook and Say Grace

    The Mushroom Cook: The Trial and The Mushroom Trial: Say Grace are also popular with listeners.

    Both are uploaded regularly, with a goal to summarise the events of the day’s trial and highlight the most significant revelations.

    The Mushroom Cook is presented by Herald Sun journalists Brooke Grebert-Craig and Laura Placella. It began in April 2024 with a detailed explanation of the case, in anticipation of the criminal proceedings, and has continued to report on developments over the past year via short episodes of 15 minutes or less.

    Say Grace, a 9Podcast presented by Penelope Liersch (Nine) and Erin Pearson (The Age), started on April 20 of this year, the day of jury selection. It provides more detailed episodes of about 30 minutes in length.

    Unlike the Daily, both of these podcasts use reenactments with voice actors performing the witness testimony. This provides a sense of authenticity and immediacy; listeners feel like they themselves are in the courtroom, privy to the evidence. However, the ethics of reenactments in video and audio documentary are murky. While some people say they aid understanding, others may see them as introducing bias or distorting reality.

    Like the Daily, both The Mushroom Cook and Say Grace are acutely aware of the potential ethical and legal risks of reporting on the case. They take care to avoid conjecture and misrepresentation, such as by using explicit disclaimers before reenactments.

    Although both podcasts are presented in a casual and conversational style, Say Grace offers more in-depth commentary on the case, using descriptive language to paint a vivid picture of courtroom proceedings.

    Ultimately, each of these three podcasts is serving more than listeners’ suspicions; they are providing an important public service by reporting the truth and preserving open justice.

    The authors do not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and have disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    – ref. Justice on demand? The true crime podcasts serving up Erin Patterson’s mushroom murder trial – https://theconversation.com/justice-on-demand-the-true-crime-podcasts-serving-up-erin-pattersons-mushroom-murder-trial-256209

    MIL OSI Analysis – EveningReport.nz –

    May 15, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Congressman Moore Introduces Resolution Honoring Pope Leo XIV

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Representative Riley Moore (WV-02)

    Washington, D.C. – This afternoon, Congressman Riley M. Moore introduced a resolution with 20 of his House colleagues to honor Pope Leo XIV after his historic election to the Chair of St. Peter. Born Robert Francis Prevost, Pope Leo XIV is a native of Chicago and graduate of Villanova University. He was ordained a priest in 1982 and named a Cardinal by Pope Francis in 2023.

    Congressman Moore issued the following statement:

    “I was thrilled to hear of Pope Leo’s XIV election to the Chair of St. Peter, and have felt a tremendous sense of national pride that an American now leads the Catholic Church.

    “I pray the Lord blesses the Holy Father with the great wisdom and unyielding courage necessary to preach the Gospel of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ.”

    Represenative Tom Suozzi (D-NY) co-led the resolution with Congressman Moore. Joining on as original co-sponsors were Representatives Tom Barrett (R-MI); Ryan Zinke (R-MT); Ann Wagner (R-MO); Michael McCaul (R-TX); Rob Bresnahan, Jr. (R-PA); Michael Rulli (R-OH); Stephanie Bice (R-OK); Lisa McClain (R-MI); John Rose (R-TN); Bryan Steil (R-WI); Mark Messmer (R-IN); Carlos Gimenez (R-FL); Chris Smith (R-NJ); French Hill (R-AR); John Rutherford (R-FL); Tony Gonzales (R-TX); Jeff Hurd (R-CO); Don Bacon (R-NE); and Jen Kiggans (R-VA).

    The Daily Wire first covered the story, read more here.

    ###

    MIL OSI USA News –

    May 15, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: As Historic Measles Outbreak Worsens, Murphy Blasts RFK Jr. On Vaccine Lies

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Connecticut – Chris Murphy
    [embedded content]
    WASHINGTON—U.S. Senator Chris Murphy (D-Conn.), a member of the U.S. Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee, on Wednesday questioned U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr. on President Trump’s Fiscal Year 2026 skinny budget request for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Murphy pressed Kennedy on broken promises made during his confirmation hearing and accused him of misleading the Committee and the public about his support for vaccines, especially for the measles vaccine.
    “I want to talk to you about the statements that you made to the Chairman of this committee and to members of this committee during your confirmation hearing about vaccines,” said Murphy. “You did not tell the truth. I find that to be really dangerous for our relationship. If I were the Chairman, who believes in vaccines and voted for you because he believed what you said about supporting vaccines, my head would be exploding. In the hearing, you told us ‘I will not work to impound, divert, or otherwise reduce any funding appropriated by Congress for the purpose of vaccination programs.’ That is not the truth. You have canceled $12 billion in public health grants to states. Whether you know this or not, that funding is used by the states in part to be able to administer and dispense information about vaccines.”
    Murphy called out Kennedy for putting public health at risk by lying to Congress during his nomination hearing and spreading misinformation that undermines trust in vaccines: “You also promised Chairman Cassidy that the FDA would not change vaccine standards from ‘historical norms.’ But what happened as soon as you were sworn in? You announced new standards for vaccine approvals that you proudly referred to in your own press release as a radical departure from current practice. And experts say that that departure will delay approvals. You also said, specific to the measles vaccine, that you support the measles vaccine, but you have consistently been undermining the measles vaccine. You told the public that the vaccine wanes very quickly. You went on the Dr. Phil show and said the measles vaccine was never fully tested for safety. You said there was fetal debris in the measles vaccine.”
    “Just this morning, in front of the House of Representatives, you also said that you in fact would not recommend that kids get vaccinated for measles,” Murphy continued. “You said you would just lay out the pros and cons. This is the summation of everything that you have said to compromise people’s faith in the measles vaccine in particular. It is contrary to what you said before this committee. You said you support the measles vaccine, but then you have laid out a set of facts that are contested, and I will submit information for the record from experts who contest what you have said about the vaccine. And the result is to undermine faith in the vaccines. Kind of like saying ‘Listen, I think you should swim in that lake, but, you know, the lake is probably toxic, and there are probably a ton of snakes and alligators in that lake, but I think you should swim in it.’ Nobody is going to swim in that lake, if that’s what you say. And so I want you to acknowledge that when you say you support the measles vaccine and then go out and repeatedly undermine the vaccine with information that is contested by public health experts, that is not supporting the vaccine.”
    After Kennedy refused to say he supports the measles vaccine, Murphy concluded: “I think you’re answering the question, and that’s really dangerous for the American public and for families in this country. The Secretary of Health and Human Services is no longer recommending the measles vaccine.”
    As of early May, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have confirmed over 1,000 measles cases across the country, making this the single largest measles outbreak in the 21st century. Those cases have led to 126 hospitalizations and three deaths.
    A full transcript of Murphy’s exchange with RFK Jr. can be found below:
    MURPHY: “Thank you very much, Madame Chair. Secretary Kennedy, I want to talk to you about your relationship with this committee and this Congress. I want to talk to you about the statements that you made to the Chairman of this committee and to members of this committee during your confirmation hearing about vaccines. You did not tell the truth. I find that to be really dangerous for our relationship. If I were the Chairman, who believes in vaccines and voted for you because he believed what you said about supporting vaccines, my head would be exploding.
    “In the hearing, you told us ‘I will not work to impound, divert, or otherwise reduce any funding appropriated by Congress for the purpose of vaccination programs.’ That is not the truth. Let me finish my question.”
    KENNEDY: “I didn’t hear what you said. I’m just asking you to repeat it so I can understand your question.”
    MURPHY: “I’ll repeat it. During the hearing you said to this committee, and to the Finance Committee, ‘I will not work to impound, divert, or otherwise reduce funding appropriated by Congress for the purpose of vaccination programs.’ That is not what happened. You have done the opposite. You canceled $12 billion in grants to the states, including my state, that are used to administer and track vaccines. You promised Chairman Cassidy– ”
    KENNEDY: “When did I do that?”
    MURPHY: “Madam Chair, would you allow me to finish my question?”
    MURKOWSKI: “Keep going with your question.”
    KENNEDY: “When did I do that?”
    MURPHY: “Let me finish my question.”
    KENNEDY: “You’re making these accusations, just tell me when I did it so I can understand what the question is.”
    MURPHY: “You have canceled $12 billion in public health grants to states. Whether you know this or not, that funding is used by the states in part to be able to administer and dispense information about vaccines. Mr. Secretary, let me give you the full panoply of things you said before this Committee that didn’t turn out to be true. You also promised Chairman Cassidy that the FDA would not change vaccine standards from ‘historical norms.’ But what happened as soon as you were sworn in? You announced new standards for vaccine approvals that you proudly referred to in your own press release as a radical departure from current practice. And experts say that that departure will delay approvals. You also said, specific to the measles vaccine, that you support the measles vaccine, but you have consistently been undermining the measles vaccine. You told the public that the vaccine wanes very quickly. You went on the Dr. Phil show and said the measles vaccine was never fully tested for safety. You said there was fetal debris in the measles vaccine. And this morning–”
    KENNEDY: “All true! All true. Do you want me to lie to the public?”
    MURPHY: “None of that is true.”
    KENNEDY: “Of course it’s true. Of course it’s true, Senator. Senator, begging your pardon, but you do not know what you are talking about.”
    MURKOWSKI: Let’s have a little bit of order so that you can get your question and that he can get his answer.
    MURPHY: “I didn’t ask for a response yet. I’d like to lay out the predicate of my question before I’m interrupted by the witness. He should have some respect for this Committee.”
    MURKOWSKI: “Go ahead.”
    MURPHY: “Just this morning, in front of the House of Representatives, you also said that you in fact would not recommend that kids get vaccinated for measles. You said you would just lay out the pros and cons. This is the summation of everything that you have said to compromise people’s faith in the measles vaccine in particular. It is contrary to what you said before this committee. You said you support the measles vaccine, but then you have laid out a set of facts that are contested, and I will submit information for the record from experts who contest what you have said about the vaccine. And the result is to undermine faith in the vaccines. Kind of like saying ‘Listen, I think you should swim in that lake, but, you know, the lake is probably toxic, and there are probably a ton of snakes and alligators in that lake, but I think you should swim in it.’ Nobody is going to swim in that lake, if that’s what you say. And so I want you to acknowledge that when you say you support the measles vaccine and then go out and repeatedly undermine the vaccine with information that is contested by public health experts, that is not supporting the vaccine. 
    “And so I guess I have two simple questions for you. One is, can you clarify what you said in the House this morning? Are you or are you not recommending that families get their children vaccinated? Or are you just giving people the pros and cons? And do you understand that when you say these things about the measles vaccine, what ends up happening is less people get the vaccine. That may be what you want, but do you understand that the result of constantly questioning the efficacy or safety of the vaccine results in less people getting the vaccine? I don’t necessarily want to spend the remaining 20 seconds in an argument over the science. But do you at least understand that that is the consequence of what you are saying? And are you actually still recommending people get the vaccine or are you not?”
    KENNEDY: “Senator, if I advise you to swim in a lake that I knew there to be alligators in, wouldn’t you want me to tell you there were alligators in it?”
    MURPHY: “So are you recommending the measles vaccine or not?”
    KENNEDY: “What I have said, and what I said in–”
    MURPHY: “It doesn’t sound like you are, if that’s–”
    KENNEDY: “Are you going to let me answer, or are you going to keep interrupting me?”
    MURPHY: “Are you, or are you not?”
    KENNEDY: “Are you going to let me answer? What I pledged before this committee during my confirmation is that I would tell the truth, and that I would have radical transparency. I’m going to tell the truth about everything we know and we don’t know about vaccines.”
    MURPHY: “Are you recommending the measles vaccine or not?”
    KENNEDY: “I am not going to just tell people everything is safe and effective if I know that there’s issues. I need to respect people’s intelligence.”
    MURPHY: “I think you’re answering the question. I think you’re answering the question, and that’s really dangerous for the American public and for families in this country.”
    KENNEDY: “The reason people have lost faith in this program is because they’ve been lied to by public officials for year after year after year.”
    MURPHY: “The Secretary of Health and Human Services is no longer recommending the measles vaccine.”

    MIL OSI USA News –

    May 15, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Security: Houston custom home builder heads to prison for misusing construction funds

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

    HOUSTON – A 40-year-old Houston man has been sentenced for wire fraud, announced U.S. Attorney Nicholas J. Ganjei.

    Brett Michael Detamore pleaded guilty Aug. 23, 2024.

    U.S. District Judge George C. Hanks has now ordered Detamore to serve 51 months in federal prison to be immediately followed by two years of supervised release. He was also ordered to pay a total of $2.3 million in restitution to over 10 victims. At the hearing, the court heard additional testimony from several victims who described how Detamore had abused their trust and devastated them financially.

    Detamore, operating as a custom home builder under Detamore Development LLC, fraudulently obtained at least $1.5 million for his personal use as a result of misusing funds intended for the construction of private residences.

    Detamore submitted false and fraudulent invoices to banks holding construction loans for single-family residences he was contracted to build. The false invoices caused the banks to send funds to bank accounts Detamore controlled. He then used the funds for his personal benefit.

    He was permitted to remain on bond and voluntarily surrender to a Federal Bureau of Prisons facility to be determined in the near future.

    The FBI conducted the investigation with the assistance of the West University Police Department. Assistant U.S. Attorneys Karen Lansden and Suzanne Elmilady prosecuted the case.

    MIL Security OSI –

    May 15, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: Diversified Royalty Corp. Announces First Quarter 2025 Results and Leadership Update

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    VANCOUVER, British Columbia, May 14, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Diversified Royalty Corp. (TSX: DIV and DIV.DB.A) (the “Corporation” or “DIV”) is pleased to announce its financial results for the three months ended March 31, 2025 (“Q1 2025”) and an update to its leadership structure.

    Highlights

    • The weighted average organic royalty growth1 of DIV’s diversified royalty portfolio was 4.9% in Q1 2025, compared to 6.0% for the three months ended March 31, 2024 (“Q1 2024”). The weighted average organic royalty growth1 on a consistent currency basis was 3.9% in Q1 2025, compared to 6.0% in Q1 2024.
    • Revenue was $15.6 million in Q1 2025, up 3.7%, compared to $15.1 million in Q1 2024.
    • Adjusted revenue1 was $17.0 million in Q1 2025, up 3.6%, compared to $16.4 million in Q1 2024.
    • Distributable cash1 was $11.1 million in Q1 2025, up 16.3%, compared to $9.6 million in Q1 2024.
    • Payout ratio1 was 93.8% in Q1 2025 on dividends of $0.0625 per share ($0.2500 per share annualized), compared to 97.2% in Q1 2024 on dividends of $0.0611 per share ($0.2444 per share annualized), which is an annualized growth of 2.3% in dividends year-over-year.

    First Quarter Commentary

    Sean Morrison, President and Chief Executive Officer of DIV stated, “The first quarter of 2025 once again saw a strong performance from our top royalty partner, Mr. Lube + Tires, which continues to produce strong growth across the system, generating SSSG6 of 9.5%. DIV’s other variable royalty partners generated mixed results with both Oxford and Mr. Mikes generating positive SSSG in Q1. DIV’s fixed royalty partners, Nurse Next Door, Stratus and BarBurrito made their fixed royalty payments. As previously announced, the deferral of 20% of Sutton’s royalties that began in the fourth quarter of 2024 will continue to the end of 2025, to help Sutton invest in the business, and build on the positive momentum that began in the last quarter. DIV continues to see a decrease in royalty income from AIR MILES® because of the continued softness across the AIR MILES® Rewards Program.”

    1. Adjusted revenue and distributable cash are non-IFRS financial measures, payout ratio is a non-IFRS ratio and weighted average organic royalty growth and Same-store-sales growth or SSSG is a supplementary financial measure – see “Non-IFRS Measures” below.

    First Quarter Results

        Three months ended March 31,  
    (000’s)     2025     2024  
    Mr. Lube + Tires   $ 7,180   $ 6,644  
    Stratusa     2,380     2,130  
    BarBurrito     2,129     2,100  
    Nurse Next Doorb     1,349     1,323  
    Oxford     1,249     1,182  
    Mr. Mikes     1,026     1,016  
    Sutton     899     1,096  
    AIR MILES®     756     892  
    Adjusted revenuec   $ 16,968   $ 16,383  

    a)   Stratus royalty income for the three months ended March 31, 2025, was US$1.7 million, translated at an average foreign exchange rate of $1.4344 to US$1 (March 31, 2024 – US$1.6 million, translated at a foreign exchange rate of $1.3483 to US$1).
    b)   Represents the DIV Royalty Entitlement plus management fees received from Nurse Next Door.
    c)   DIV Royalty Entitlement and adjusted revenue are non-IFRS financial measures and as such, do not have standardized meanings under IFRS. For additional information, refer to “Non-IFRS Measures” in this news release.

    In Q1 2025, DIV generated $15.6 million of revenue compared to $15.1 million in Q1 2024. After taking into account the DIV Royalty Entitlement2 (defined below) related to DIV’s royalty arrangements with Nurse Next Door, DIV’s adjusted revenue2 was $17.0 million in Q1 2025, compared to $16.4 million in Q1 2024. Adjusted revenue increased primarily due to positive SSSG2 (defined below) at Mr. Lube + Tires, Oxford and Mr. Mikes, the annual contractual increases at Stratus, Nurse Next Door and BarBurrito, partially offset by lower royalty income from AIR MILES® and Sutton’s 20% royalty deferral, all as discussed in further detail below.

    2. Adjusted revenue and DIV Royalty Entitlement are non-IFRS financial measures and SSSG are supplementary financial measures – see “Non-IFRS Measures” below.

    Royalty Partner Business Updates

    Mr. Lube + Tires: Mr. Lube + Tires generated SSSG3 of 9.5% for the Mr. Lube + Tires stores in the royalty pool for Q1 2025, compared to SSSG of 14.6% in Q1 2024. SSSG in the current period is primarily due to the sustained growth across the Mr. Lube + Tires system.

    3. Same-store-sales growth or SSSG is a supplementary financial measure – see “Non-IFRS Measures” below.

    Stratus: Royalty income from SBS Franchising LLC (“Stratus”) was $2.4 million (US$1.7 million translated at an average foreign exchange rate of $1.4344 to US$1.00) for Q1 2025. The fixed royalty payable by Stratus increases each November at a rate of 5% until and including November 2026 and 4% each November thereafter during the term of the license, with the most recent increase effective November 15, 2024.

    Nurse Next Door: The royalty entitlement to DIV (the “DIV Royalty Entitlement4”) from Nurse Next Door Professional Homecare Services Inc. (“Nurse Next Door”) was $1.3 million in Q1 2025. The DIV Royalty Entitlement from Nurse Next Door grows at a fixed rate of 2.0% per annum during the term of the license, with the most recent increase effective October 1, 2024.

    4. DIV Royalty Entitlement is a non-IFRS measure – see “Non-IFRS Measures” below.

    Mr. Mikes: SSSG5 for the Mr. Mikes Restaurants Corporation (“Mr. Mikes”) restaurants in the Mr. Mikes royalty pool was 1.5% in Q1 2025, compared to SSSG of -5.5% in Q1 2024. The higher SSSG percentage in the current period is due to an increase in restaurant guest traffic.

    Royalty income and management fees of $1.0 million were generated from Mr. Mikes for Q1 2025 and 2024, respectively.

    5. Same-store-sales growth or SSSG is a supplementary financial measure – see “Non-IFRS Measures” below.

    Oxford: The Oxford Learning Centres, Inc. (“Oxford”) locations in the Oxford royalty pool generated SSSG6 (on a constant currency basis) of 5.5% in Q1 2025, compared to SSSG -2.1% in Q1 2024. Oxford’s positive SSSG for the quarter is due to the solid performance of the Oxford system during the quarter.

    6. Same-store-sales growth or SSSG is a supplementary financial measure – see “Non-IFRS Measures” below.

    AIR MILES®: In Q1 2025, royalty income of $0.8 million was generated from the AIR MILES® Licenses compared to $0.9 million generated in Q1 2024, a decrease of 15.2% from the comparable quarter. The decrease is largely due to continued softness in the AIR MILES® Rewards Program.

    Sutton: In Q1 2025, royalty income of $0.9 million was generated from Sutton, which includes a 20% royalty deferral for Q1, 2025, compared to $1.1 million for Q1, 2024. The deferred royalties do not accrue interest and are due in full on December 31, 2027. The fixed royalty payable by Sutton increases at a rate of 2% per year, with the most recent increase effective July 1, 2024.

    BarBurrito: Royalty income from BarBurrito Restaurants Inc. (“BarBurrito”) was $2.1 million for Q1 2025. The royalty payable by BarBurrito initially grows at a fixed rate of 4% per annum each March from and including March 2025 to and including March 2030 and, commencing on January 1, 2031, will fluctuate based on the gross sales of the BarBurrito locations in the royalty pool.

    Distributable Cash and Dividends Declared

    In Q1 2025, distributable cash7 increased to $11.1 million ($0.0666 per share), compared to $9.6 million ($0.0629 per share), in Q1 2024. The increase in distributable cash per share7 for the quarter was primarily due to an increase in distributable cash, partially offset by a higher weighted average number of common shares outstanding7.

    In Q1 2025, the payout ratio7 was 93.8% on dividends of $0.0625 per share, compared to the payout ratio of 97.2% on dividends of $0.0611 per share for the same respective period in 2024. The decrease to the payout ratio was primarily due to higher distributable cash per share7, partially offset by higher dividends declared per share7.

    7. Distributable cash is a non-IFRS financial measure and distributable cash per share and payout ratio are non-IFRS ratios – see “Non-IFRS Measures” below.

    Net Income

    Net income for Q1 2025 was $8.0 million compared to net income of $7.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2024. The increase in net income in Q1 2025, was primarily due to the higher adjusted revenues8, lower interest expenses and share-based compensation expenses, partially offset by higher salaries and benefits, income tax expenses, and other finance costs.

    8. Adjusted revenue is a non-IFRS financial measure – see “Non-IFRS Measures” below.

    Availability of Annual General Meeting Materials and Leadership Update

    The proxy-related materials for DIV’s upcoming Annual General meeting of shareholders  (the “Meeting”) to be held on Thursday, June 19, 2025 are now available and have been posted under DIV’s profile on SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.com and on DIV’s website at: https://www.diversifiedroyaltycorp.com/investors/financial-and-regulatory-reports/financial-reports-2025/.

    At the Meeting, shareholders will be asked to: (i) receive the consolidated financial statements of DIV for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, together with the report of the auditors thereon, (ii) elect directors of the Corporation for the ensuing year, and (iii) appoint KPMG LLP as auditors of the Corporation for the ensuing year and to authorize the directors of the Corporation to fix their remuneration.

    The Board is pleased to nominate Sean Morrison, our President and Chief Executive Officer, for election to the Board, alongside the current directors. The Board is also pleased to announce the promotion of Greg Gutmanis from Chief Financial Officer and Vice President, Acquisitions, to President and Chief Financial Officer, effective July 1, 2025.

    In his expanded role, Greg will assume greater responsibility for DIV’s day-to-day operations, including oversight of our Royalty Partners’ businesses, identifying and executing new acquisition opportunities, and engaging with DIV’s shareholders and prospective investors. Greg has played a key role in DIV’s growth since its inception. He is widely recognized within Vancouver’s finance community, having received the 2020 BC CFO Award and being named one of Business in Vancouver’s “Top Forty Under 40” in 2017. During his tenure at DIV, Greg has managed approximately $400 million in equity and convertible debenture offerings and over $200 million in senior debt. Prior to joining DIV, he co-managed $165 million across two private equity funds and worked as an investment banker.

    Sean Morrison, stated, “Greg’s promotion to President and Chief Financial Officer is well deserved. I’ve had the pleasure of working with Greg for nearly 20 years in investment banking, private equity, and for the past decade at DIV. Greg is a consummate professional who continues to broaden his expertise and expand his leadership role each year. As continuing CFO and incoming President, I’m confident Greg will continue to grow his responsibilities, and I look forward to working closely with him to deliver value to DIV shareholders.”

    Sean will continue to lead DIV’s strategic direction and overall business as its Chief Executive Officer.

    About Diversified Royalty Corp.

    DIV is a multi-royalty corporation, engaged in the business of acquiring top-line royalties from well-managed multi-location businesses and franchisors in North America. DIV’s objective is to acquire predictable, growing royalty streams from a diverse group of multi-location businesses and franchisors.

    DIV currently owns the Mr. Lube + Tires, AIR MILES®, Sutton, Mr. Mikes, Nurse Next Door, Oxford Learning Centres, Stratus Building Solutions and BarBurrito trademarks. Mr. Lube + Tires is the leading quick lube service business in Canada, with locations across Canada. AIR MILES® is Canada’s largest coalition loyalty program. Sutton is among the leading residential real estate brokerage franchisor businesses in Canada. Mr. Mikes operates casual steakhouse restaurants primarily in western Canadian communities. Nurse Next Door is a home care provider with locations across Canada and the United States as well as in Australia. Oxford Learning Centres is one of Canada’s leading franchisee supplemental education services. Stratus Building Solutions is a leading commercial cleaning service franchise company providing comprehensive building cleaning, and office cleaning services primarily in the United States. BarBurrito is the largest quick service Mexican restaurant food chain in Canada.

    DIV’s objective is to increase cash flow per share by making accretive royalty purchases and through the growth of purchased royalties. DIV intends to continue to pay a predictable and stable monthly dividend to shareholders and increase the dividend over time, in each case as cash flow per share allows.

    Forward-Looking Statements

    Certain statements contained in this news release may constitute “forward-looking information” within the meaning of applicable securities laws that involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking information. The use of any of the words “anticipate”, “continue”, “estimate”, “expect”, “intend”, “may”, “will”, ”project”, “should”, “believe”, “confident”, “plan” and “intend” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking information, although not all forward-looking information contains these identifying words. Specifically, forward-looking information in this news release includes, but is not limited to, statements made in relation to: the deferral of Sutton Royalties continuing for the remainder of 2025 to help Sutton invest in the business and build on the positive momentum that began in the last quarter; the terms on which the deferred royalties are required to be paid by Sutton; the promotion of Greg Gutmanis to President and Chief Financial Officer effective July 1, 2025, and that Sean Morrisson will continue to lead DIV’s strategic direction and overall business as Chief Executive Officer; details of DIV’s upcoming Annual General Meeting; DIV’s intention to pay monthly dividends to shareholders; and DIV’s corporate objectives. These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results or events, performance, or achievements of DIV to differ materially from those anticipated or implied by such forward-looking information. DIV believes that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking information included in this news release are reasonable but no assurance can be given that these expectations will prove to be correct. In particular, risks and uncertainties include: DIV’s royalty partners may not make their respective royalty payments to DIV, in whole or in part; the decline in royalties received under the AIR MILES® licenses could cause AM Royalties Limited Partnership (“AM LP”) to be required to make partial or full repayment of the outstanding principal amount under its credit agreement, or cause AM LP to be in default under its credit agreement; current positive trends being experienced by certain of DIV’s royalty partners (and their respective franchisees) may not continue and may regress, and negative trends experienced by certain of DIV’s Royalty Partners (including their respective franchisees) may continue and may regress; Sutton may not pay all deferred royalties in accordance with the timing required or at all; Sutton’s investment of the deferred royalties may not achieve their intended effects; Sutton may require further deferrals of royalties beyond those contemplated by the current deferral agreement; DIV and its royalty partners performance in the remainder of 2025 may not meet management’s expectations; DIV may not be able to make monthly dividend payments to the holders of its common shares; dividends are not guaranteed and may be reduced, suspended or terminated at any time; or DIV may not achieve any of its corporate objectives. Given these uncertainties, readers are cautioned that forward-looking information included in this news release is not a guarantee of future performance, and such forward-looking information should not be unduly relied upon. More information about the risks and uncertainties affecting DIV’s business and the businesses of its royalty partners can be found in the “Risk Factors” section of its Annual Information Form dated March 24, 2025 and in DIV’s management’s discussion and analysis for the three months ended March 31, 2025, copies of which are available under DIV’s profile on SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.com.

    In formulating the forward-looking information contained herein, management has assumed that DIV will generate sufficient cash flows from its royalties to service its debt and pay dividends to shareholders; lenders will provide any necessary waivers required in order to allow DIV to continue to pay dividends; lenders will provide any other necessary covenant waivers to DIV and its royalty partners; the performance of DIV’s royalty partners will be consistent with DIV’s and its royalty partners’ respective expectations; recent positive trends for certain of DIV’s royalty partners (including their respective franchisees) will continue and not regress; current negative trends experienced by certain of DIV’s royalty partners (including their respective franchisees) will not materially regress; Sutton will pay all deferred royalties in accordance with the required timing in full and will not require further deferrals; Sutton’s investment of the deferred royalties will achieve its intended effects; the businesses of DIV’s respective royalty partners will not suffer any material adverse effect; and the business and economic conditions affecting DIV and its royalty partners will continue substantially in the ordinary course, including without limitation with respect to general industry conditions, general levels of economic activity and regulations. These assumptions, although considered reasonable by management at the time of preparation, may prove to be incorrect.

    All of the forward-looking information in this news release is qualified by these cautionary statements and other cautionary statements or factors contained herein, and there can be no assurance that the actual results or developments will be realized or, even if substantially realized, that it will have the expected consequences to, or effects on, DIV. The forward-looking information in this news release is made as of the date of this news release and DIV assumes no obligation to publicly update or revise such information to reflect new events or circumstances, except as may be required by applicable law.

    Non-IFRS Measures

    Management believes that disclosing certain non-IFRS financial measures, non-IFRS ratios and supplementary financial measures provides readers with important information regarding the Corporation’s financial performance and its ability to pay dividends and the performance of its royalty partners. By considering these measures in combination with the most closely comparable IFRS measure, management believes that investors are provided with additional and more useful information about the Corporation and its royalty partners than investors would have if they simply considered IFRS measures alone. The non-IFRS financial measures, non-IFRS ratios and supplementary financial measures do not have standardized meanings prescribed by IFRS and therefore are unlikely to be comparable to similar measures presented by other issuers. Investors are cautioned that non-IFRS measures should not be construed as a substitute or an alternative to net income or cash flows from operating activities as determined in accordance with IFRS.

    “Adjusted revenue”, “adjusted royalty income”, “DIV Royalty Entitlement” and “distributable cash” are used as non-IFRS financial measures in this news release.

    Adjusted revenue is calculated as royalty income plus DIV Royalty Entitlement and management fees. The following table reconciles adjusted revenue and adjusted royalty income to royalty income, the most directly comparable IFRS measure disclosed in the financial statements:

        Three months ended March 31,  
    (000’s)     2025     2024  
    Mr. Lube + Tires   $ 7,120   $ 6,585  
    Stratus     2,380     2,130  
    BarBurrito     2,108     2,080  
    Oxford     1,238     1,172  
    Mr. Mikes     1,015     1,006  
    Sutton     871     1,068  
    AIR MILES®     756     892  
    Royalty income   $ 15,488   $ 14,933  
    DIV Royalty Entitlement     1,329     1,303  
    Adjusted royalty income   $ 16,817   $ 16,236  
    Management fees     151     147  
    Adjusted revenue   $ 16,968   $ 16,383  
               

    For further details with respect to adjusted revenue and adjusted royalty income, refer to the subsection “Non-IFRS Financial Measures” under “Description of Non-IFRS Financial Measures, Non-IFRS Ratios and Supplementary Financial Measures” in the Corporation’s management’s discussion and analysis for the three months ended March 31, 2025, a copy of which is available on SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.com.

    The most closely comparable IFRS measure to DIV Royalty Entitlement is “distributions received from NND LP”. DIV Royalty Entitlement is calculated as distributions received from NND LP, before any deduction for expenses incurred by NND Holdings Limited Partnership (“NND LP”), which expenses include legal, audit, tax and advisory services. Note that distributions received from NND LP is derived from the royalty paid by Nurse Next Door to NND LP. The following table reconciles DIV Royalty Entitlement to distributions received from NND LP in the financial statements:

        Three months ended March 31,  
    (000’s)     2025     2024  
    Distributions received from NND LP   $ 1,325   $ 1,300  
    Add: NND Royalties LP expenses     4     3  
    DIV Royalty Entitlement     1,329     1,303  
           
    Less: NND Royalties LP expenses     (4 )   (3 )
    DIV Royalty Entitlement, net of NND Royalties LP expenses   $ 1,325   $ 1,300  
           

    For further details with respect to DIV Royalty Entitlement, refer to the subsection “Non-IFRS Financial Measures” under “Description of Non-IFRS Financial Measures, Non-IFRS Ratios and Supplementary Financial Measures” in the Corporation’s management’s discussion and analysis for the three months ended March 31, 2025, a copy of which is available on SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.com.

    The following table reconciles distributable cash to cash flows generated from operating activities, the most directly comparable IFRS measure disclosed in the financial statements:

        Three months ended March 31,  
    (000’s)     2025     2024  
           
    Cash flows generated from operating activities   $ 10,160   $ 10,850  
           
    Current tax expense     (1,719 )   (1,291 )
    Accrued interest on convertible debentures     (788 )   (788 )
    Accrued interest on bank loans     (374 )   –  
    Distributions on MRM units earned in current periods     (48 )   (41 )
    Mandatory principal payments on credit facilities     –     (628 )
    Payment of lease obligations     (28 )   (27 )
    NND LP expenses     (4 )   (3 )
    Accrued DIV Royalty Entitlement, net of distributions     4     3  
    Foreign exchange and other     49     42  
    Changes in working capital     850     263  
    Taxes paid     3,036     1,498  
    Note receivable     –     (305 )
    Distributable cash   $ 11,138   $ 9,573  


    For further details with respect to distributable cash, refer to the subsection “Non-IFRS Financial Measures” under “Description of Non-IFRS Financial Measures, Non-IFRS Ratios and Supplementary Financial Measures” in the Corporation’s management’s discussion and analysis for the three months ended March 31, 2025, a copy of which is available on SEDAR+ at
    www.sedarplus.com.

    “Distributable cash per share” and “payout ratio” are non-IFRS ratios that do not have a standardized meaning prescribed by IFRS, and therefore may not be comparable to similar ratios presented by other issuers. Distributable cash per share is defined as distributable cash, a non-IFRS measure, divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. The payout ratio is calculated by dividing the dividends per share during the period by the distributable cash per share, a non-IFRS measure, generated in that period. For further details, refer to the subsection entitled “Non-IFRS Ratios” under “Description of Non-IFRS Financial Measures, Non-IFRS Ratios and Supplementary Financial Measures” in the Corporation’s management’s discussion and analysis for the three months ended March 31, 2025, a copy of which is available on SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.com.

    “Weighted average organic royalty growth” is the average same store sales growth percentage related to Mr. Lube + Tires, Oxford and Mr. Mikes plus the average increase in adjusted royalty income from AIR MILES®, Sutton (less 20% deferral in Q1, 2025), Nurse Next Door, BarBurrito and Stratus over the prior comparable period taking into account the percentage weighting of each royalty partner’s adjusted royalty income in proportion of the total adjusted royalty income for the period. Weighted average organic royalty growth is a supplementary financial measure and does not have a standardized meaning prescribed by IFRS. However, the Corporation believes that weighted average organic royalty growth is a useful measure as it provides investors with an indication of the change in year-over-year growth of each royalty partner, taking into account the percentage weighting of royalty partner’s growth in proportion of total growth, as applicable. The Corporation’s method of calculating weighted average organic royalty growth may differ from those of other issuers or companies and, accordingly, weighted average organic royalty growth may not be comparable to similar measures used by other issuers or companies.

    “Same store sales growth” or “SSSG” and “system sales” are supplementary financial measures and do not have standardized meanings prescribed by IFRS and therefore may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other issuers. SSSG and system sales figures are reported to DIV by its Royalty Partners – see “Third Party Information”. For further details, refer to the subsection entitled “Supplementary Financial Measures” under “Description of Non-IFRS Financial Measures, Non-IFRS Ratios and Supplementary Financial Measures” in the Corporation’s management’s discussion and analysis for the three months ended March 31, 2025, a copy of which is available on SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.com.

    Third Party Information

    This news release includes information obtained from third party company filings and reports and other publicly available sources as well as financial statements and other reports provided to DIV by its royalty partners. Although DIV believes these sources to be generally reliable, such information cannot be verified with complete certainty. Accordingly, the accuracy and completeness of this information is not guaranteed. DIV has not independently verified any of the information from third party sources referred to in this news release nor ascertained the underlying assumptions relied upon by such sources.

    THE TORONTO STOCK EXCHANGE HAS NOT REVIEWED AND DOES NOT ACCEPT RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ADEQUACY OR THE ACCURACY OF THIS RELEASE.

    Additional Information

    The information in this news release should be read in conjunction with DIV’s consolidated financial statements and management’s discussion and analysis (“MD&A”) for the three months ended March 31, 2025, which are available on SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.com.

    Additional information relating to the Corporation and other public filings, is available on SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.com.

    Contact:
    Sean Morrison, President and Chief Executive Officer
    Diversified Royalty Corp.
    (236) 521-8470

    Greg Gutmanis, Chief Financial Officer and VP Acquisitions
    Diversified Royalty Corp.
    (236) 521-8471

    The MIL Network –

    May 15, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Pressley, Booker, Warren Unveil Bill to Suspend Garnishments for Student Loan Borrowers

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Congresswoman Ayanna Pressley (MA-07)

    Bill Comes as Trump Admin. Set to Seize Hard-Earned Wages, Tax Refunds, and Social Security Checks for Struggling Borrowers

    The Ending Administrative Wage Garnishment Act of 2025 will also reform administration of the administrative wage garnishment program

    Bill Text (PDF)

    WASHINGTON – Today, Congresswoman Ayanna Pressley (MA-07), along with Senators Cory Booker (D-NJ) and Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), reintroduced the Ending Administrative Wage Garnishment Act of 2025, legislation that would provide borrower relief and support by suspending garnishment as a tool for student debt collection by the federal government.

    On April 22, 2025, the Department of Education announced that, starting May 5th, it will resume collections on defaulted federal student loans, including wage garnishments, tax refund interceptions, and seizure of Social Security benefits. For the nearly 5.5 million people currently in default—and soon for the projected 8 million additional people in delinquency—this means that they will face the government’s harsh collection tactics for the first time in over five years. This shift coincides with mass firings at the Department of Education and limited access to income-driven repayment plans, leaving students without critical support to navigate the repayment process.  

    “No one should have their hard-earned wages, tax refunds, and Social Security checks seized by Donald Trump—and our bill would ensure they do not,” said Representative Pressley. “The Trump Administration should not be in the business of picking the pockets of our most vulnerable borrowers, gutting the Department of Education or exacerbating the student debt crisis. I am proud to partner with Senators Booker and Warren to push back against this Administration’s shameful garnishment tactics and stand up for our student borrowers.”

    “Wage garnishment allows the government to instruct employers to withhold up to 15 percent of an individual’s hard-earned wages, as well as intercept tax refunds, and seize Social Security benefits in order to collect student loan debt,” said Senator Booker. “If resumed, this harmful practice will hurt millions of Americans already struggling to make ends meet while paying off their student loans. This legislation will put an end to the Trump’s administration’s attempt to punish vulnerable student loan borrowers.”

    “It’s cruel for the Trump administration to restart collections while it crashes the economy and fires employees that help people navigate the loan repayment system,” said Senator Warren. “Our commonsense bill stops the administration from going after working people and improperly taking a chunk of borrowers’ paychecks.”

    “Amidst unprecedented economic uncertainty and as millions of working families are struggling with the rising costs of everyday essentials, the Trump Administration’s calloused decision to unleash abusive and uncontrollable collection tools that have the power to take borrower’s hard earned wages without safeguards. Instead of helping the 5 million borrowers that have fallen into default and the millions more that are behind and now at risk of default later this year, this Administration appears set on inflicting massive economic harm on millions of Americans—a decision that will further drag down an already struggling economy,” said SBPC Policy Director Aissa Canchola Banez. “We applaud Senator Booker and Congresswoman Pressley for introducing the Ending Administrative Garnishment Act which will rein in the Secretary of Education’s authority to subject borrowers to administrative wage garnishment and ensure that critical safeguards are in place.”

    The Ending Administrative Wage Garnishment Act of 2025:

    • Suspends the Secretary of Education’s authority to garnish wages, tax refunds, Social Security checks, or other earned benefits
    • Mandates the Department of Education to:
      • Promptly refund improperly garnished wages within one week.
      • Establish the ability to independently suspend or terminate garnishment operations upon identifying errors.
      • Ensure employers verify garnishment information quarterly.
    • Prohibits garnishment on loans that have been outstanding for more than 10 years.
    • Establishes a private right of action allowing borrowers to sue employers who improperly garnish wages after a garnishment order is suspended.
    • Requires the Department to pay double damages to borrowers whose wages are improperly garnished.

    To read the full text of the bill, click here.

    Rep. Pressley has been a leading voice in Congress urging President Biden to cancel student debt. Following years of advocacy by Rep. Pressley—in partnership with colleagues, borrowers, and advocates—the Biden-Harris Administration announced a historic plan to cancel student debt that stands to benefit over 40 million people. She has consistently helped borrowers access student debt cancellation resources, including PSLF, and she was proud to welcome a union educator and PSLF recipient as her guest to President Biden’s State of the Union Address in March.

    • On October 18, 2024, Rep. Pressley applauded the Biden-Harris Administration’s approval of approximately $4.5 billion in additional student debt cancellation for approximately 60,000 workers nationwide who work in public service.
    • On October 2, 2024, Rep. Pressley joined borrowers and advocates to unveil new state-by-state data quantifying the harm that Project 2025 would have on millions of public service workers nationwide.
    • On September 10, 2024, Rep. Pressley joined Senator Warren and Rep. Jim Clyburn in urging the U.S. Department of Education to consider terminating its contract with student loan servicer MOHELA.
    • On August 29, Rep. Pressley issued a statement following the Supreme Court’s refusal to reinstate President Biden’s Saving on a Valuable Education (SAVE) student debt relief program.
    • On August 9, 2024, Rep. Pressley joined Senator Warren, Representative Dean, and their colleagues urging student loan servicer Navient to reform its flawed process to cancel the private student loans of borrowers who attended fraudulent, for-profit colleges.
    • On June 25, 2024, Rep. Pressley issued a statement on federal judges in Missouri and Kansas siding with Republican states to block portions of President Biden’s Saving on a Valuable Education (SAVE) student debt relief program. 
    • On June 25, 2024, Rep. Pressley colleagues, borrowers, and advocates urged the Biden Administration to terminate the contract of federal student loan servicer MOHELA. Their calls follow MOHELA’s repeated failure to perform basic loan servicing functions and ongoing harm caused by MOHELA to student loan borrowers.
    • On May 20, 2024, Rep. Pressley, along with Reps. Omar, Clyburn and Wilson, led their colleagues in urging the U.S. Department of Education to ensure its proposed student debt relief rule is implemented in the most effective and efficient manner possible for millions of borrowers.
    • On May 1, 2024, Rep. Pressley issued a statement applauding the Biden Administration’s approval of student loan discharge for 317,000 borrowers who attended The Art Institutes, including over 3,500 borrowers in Massachusetts.
    • On April 14, 2024, Rep. Pressley applauded President Biden’s approval of an additional $7.4 billion in student debt cancellation for 277,000 borrowers.
    • On April 8, 2024, Rep. Pressley hailed President Biden’s announcement of new plans to provide student debt relief for tens of millions of borrowers across the country.
    • On March 21, 2024, Rep. Pressley applauded the Biden-Harris Administration’s approval of $5.8 billion in additional student loan debt cancellation for 77,700 public service workers.
    • On March 20, 2024, Rep. Pressley and Senator Elizabeth Warren led their colleagues in calling on federal agencies to end the practice of offsetting Social Security benefits to pay off defaulted student loans.
    • On March 7, 2024, Rep. Pressley welcomed Priscilla Higuera Valentine, a first generation American, a proud union educator with Boston Public Schools and the Boston Teachers Union, and the daughter of a Colombian immigrant, who has received over $117,000 in student debt relief under the Biden-Harris Administration’s improved Public Service Loan Forgiveness (PSLF) Program, as her guest to President Biden’s State of the Union Address.
    • On February 23, 2024, Rep. Pressley applauded the Biden-Harris Administration’s approval of $1.2 billion in student debt cancellation for nearly 153,000 borrowers nationwide, including $19.5 million in cancellation for 2,490 Massachusetts borrowers.
    • On January 26, 2024, Rep. Pressley and Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) led their colleagues in calling on the Secretary of Education Miguel Cardona to host a fourth session of the student debt negotiated rulemaking to consider relief for borrowers experiencing financial hardship. She applauded ED’s announcement that it would heed their calls.
    • On December 11, 2023, Rep. Pressley testified at the U.S. Department of Education’s final hearing on student debt cancellation.
    • On December 11, 2023, Rep. Pressley and Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), along with Senators Chuck Schumer (D-NY), Bernie Sanders (I-VT), Alex Padilla (D-CA), and Representatives Ilhan Omar (MN-05) and Frederica Wilson (FL-24), sent a letter to U.S. Secretary of Education Miguel Cardona, urging him to leverage his existing and full authority under the Higher Education Act to provide expanded student debt relief to working and middle-class borrowers. 
    • On November 30, 2023, Rep. Pressley emphasized the crucial role of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) in protecting student loan borrowers from incompetent and predatory student loan servicers.
    • On November 6, 2023, Rep. Pressley joined Attorney General Andrea Campbell, Mayor Michelle Wu, and Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) for a clinic to help federal student loan borrowers access a temporary opportunity to get closer to Public Service Loan Forgiveness (PSLF). 
    • On September 25, 2023, Rep. Pressley hosted a policy discussion with borrowers and advocates at which they renewed their urgent call for student debt cancellation with loan payments set to resume on October 1, 2023.
    • On August 23, 2023, Rep. Pressley, Sen. Warren, and their colleagues led over 80 lawmakers in a letter to President Joe Biden, urging him to swiftly deliver on his promise to deliver student debt cancellation to working and middle class families by early 2024. 
    • On August 22, 2023 Rep. Pressley applauded Governor Maura Healey’s plan to provide student debt relief for health care workers in Massachusetts. 
    • On June 30, 2023, Rep. Pressley responded to the President’s alternative proposal to deliver relief under the Higher Education Act and called for swift and efficient implementation.
    • On June 30, 2023, Rep. Pressley issued a statement slamming the Supreme Court’s decision to block President Biden’s student debt cancellation plan and calling on the President to use other tools available to swiftly cancel student debt.
    • On May 30, 2023, Rep. Pressley filed an amendment to H.R. 3746, legislation to raise the debt ceiling, to protect student loan borrowers and preserve the Biden Administration’s pause on federal student loan payments.
    • On May 24, 2023, Rep. Pressley issued a statement slamming Republicans’ harmful effort to overturn President Biden’s student debt relief, including his debt cancellation plan, the pause on student loan payments, and the expanded Public Service Loan Forgiveness (PSLF) program.
    • On May 24, 2023, Rep. Pressley delivered a powerful speech in support of President Biden’s plan to cancel student debt, which would benefit millions of people across the country.
    • On April 5, 2023, Rep. Pressley and Senator Elizabeth Warren wrote to the CEO of SoFi Technologies and SoFi Lending Corp calling on the company to answer for its lawsuits attempting to end the student loan payment pause and force borrowers back into repayment.
    • On March 7, 2023, Rep. Pressley, along with Sens. Warren, Schumer, Sanders, Padilla and Reps. Clyburn, Omar and Wilson led a letter to the Biden Administration expressing continued support for President Biden’s student debt relief plan.
    • On February 28, 2023, Rep. Pressley rallied with borrowers and advocates outside the Supreme Court to call on the Supreme Court to affirm the legality of President Biden’s student debt cancellation plan.
    • On November 22, 2022, Rep. Pressley issued a statement applauding the extension of the student loan payment pause.
    • On October 25, 2022, Rep. Pressley and Senator Warren toured communities across Massachusetts to celebrate the Biden administration’s student debt cancellation plan and help residents sign up for student loan relief.
    • On October 12, 2022, Rep. Pressley joined parent borrowers and advocates for a discussion on the impacts of student debt cancellation on parents and families.
    • On September 29, 2022, Rep. Pressley, along with Senate Majority Leader Schumer and Reps. Omar, Jones and advocates, held a press conference to call for swift and equitable implementation of President Biden’s student debt cancellation plan.
    • On September 21, 2022, Rep. Pressley delivered a powerful speech on the House floor in which she heralded President Biden’s action to cancel student debt for millions of families in the Massachusetts 7th and across the nation. Watch the full video here.
    • On September 12, 2022, Rep. Pressley and Senator Warren wrote to the nine federal student loan servicers to inquire about how they are providing borrowers with accurate and timely information about student loan cancellation.
    • On August 24, 2022, Congresswoman Pressley issued a statement applauding President Biden’s action to cancel student debt.
    • On August 10, 2022, Congresswoman Pressley and Senator Warren Massachusetts joined Massachusetts union leaders in Dorchester for a roundtable discussion on student debt cancellation.
    • On July 18, 2022, Congresswoman Pressley delivered remarks at the American Federation of Teachers (AFT) national convention and renewed her calls for President Biden to cancel student debt by executive action.
    • On July 8, 2022, Congresswoman Pressley with The Debt Collective hosted a virtual roundtable with student debt holders from all walks of life to highlight the intersectional burden the nearly $2 trillion student debt crisis has had on individuals and families. 
    • On June 22, 2022, Congresswoman Ayanna Pressley, with Senator Elizabeth Warren and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, joined AFL-CIO and union leaders for a roundtable discussion on the importance of student debt cancellation for American workers.
    • On May 20, 2022, Congresswoman Pressley applauded the Congressional Black Caucus’ (CBC) statement calling on President Biden to cancel student loan debt.
    • On May 4, 2022, Congresswoman Pressley visited Bunker Hill Community College to celebrate the $1 million in federal community project funding she secured and continued her calls for President Biden to cancel student debt.
    • On March 17, 2022, Congresswoman Pressley and Arisha Hatch, vice president and chief of campaigns at Color of Change, published an op-ed in Grio calling on President Biden to use his executive order authority to cancel up to $50,000 in student loan debt per borrower.
    • On December 8, 2021, Congresswoman Ayanna Pressley, Senator Elizabeth Warren, and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer sent a bicameral letter to President Joe Biden releasing new data about the adverse impact of restarting student loan payments and calling on him to act to cancel up to $50,000 of student debt.
    • On December 2, 2021, Congresswoman Pressley delivered remarks on the House floor in which she reiterated her calls for President Biden to cancel $50,000 in federal student loan debt by executive action.
    • On October 8, 2021, Representatives Ayanna Pressley and Ilhan Omar and their House colleagues sent a letter to President Biden and Secretary of Education Miguel Cardona urging him to release the memo to determine the extent of the administration’s authority to broadly cancel student debt through administrative action.
    • On July 29, 2021, Congresswoman Pressley issued a statement reaffirming President Biden’s authority – and the urgency – to cancel student loan debt.
    • On June 23, 2021, Congresswoman Ayanna Pressley, Senator Elizabeth Warren, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, and Congressman Joe Courtney led their colleagues on a bicameral letter to President Biden calling on him to extend the pause on federal student loan payments.
    • On April 13, 2021, Congresswoman Pressley testified at a Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee’s Subcommittee on Economic Policy hearing to examine the student loan debt crisis in our country.
    • On April 1, 2021, Congresswoman Pressley, along with Senator Elizabeth Warren and Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey, held a press conference calling on President Biden to tackle the student loan debt crisis.
    • On February 4, 2021, Congresswoman Pressley, along with several Democratic House and Senate leaders, led their colleagues in reintroducing a bicameral resolution outlining a bold plan for President Biden to tackle the student loan debt crisis. 
    • On December 17, 2020, Representatives Ayanna Pressley, Ilhan Omar, Maxine Waters, and Alma Adams introduced a resolution outlining a bold plan for President-elect Joe Biden to cancel up to $50,000 in Federal student loan debt for student loan borrowers.
    • On December 10, 2020, Congresswoman Pressley was in Yahoo Finance urging the Biden administration to cancel student debt, stressing the impact on Black borrowers.
    • On May 8, 2020, Representatives Ayanna Pressley, Alma Adams, and Ilhan Omar, led 28 of their colleagues and sent a letter to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy calling for the universal, one-time, student debt cancellation of at least $30,000 per borrower in the next round of COVID-19 relief legislation.
    • On March 23, 2020, Representatives Ayanna Pressley and Ilhan Omar introduced the Student Debt Emergency Relief Act, legislation that provides immediate monthly payment relief for federal student loan borrowers.
    • On March 17, 2020, Congresswoman Ayanna Pressley and Senator Elizabeth Warren were on The Hill calling on congressional leadership to include student debt cancellation in the next coronavirus relief package.
    • On October 11, 2019, Congresswoman Pressley introduced legislation – the Ending Debt Collection Harassment Act – to protect consumers from abusive debt collection.
    • On July 17, 2019, Congresswomen Pressley introduced legislation – the Student Borrower Credit Improvement Act – to provide much needed support to private student loan borrowers with a pathway to financial stability by helping them improve their credit.

    ###

    MIL OSI USA News –

    May 15, 2025
  • MIL-Evening Report: Economic pessimism is behind the drift of voters to minor parties and independents

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Viet Nguyen, Principal Research Fellow, Macroeconomics Research Program, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, The University of Melbourne

    Growing economic pessimism appears to have pushed many voters away from Australia’s two major parties, Labor and the Coalition. Support for minor parties and independents has doubled since the Global Financial Crisis in 2008.

    In the latest federal election, minor parties and independents are on track to gain a record share of the vote, at 33.4%. Although Labor won just 34.6% and the Coalition 32% of first preferences, Labor secured a majority after preference flows, reflecting a broader shift away from the major parties.

    Commentary in both Australian media and in the United States framed the result as a reaction against US President Donald Trump’s return to politics. That echoed analysis of Canada’s surprise centre-left Liberal party win a week earlier.

    But a more straightforward explanation lies in Australian voters’ dissatisfaction with economic conditions.

    In a new study, we used three decades of data from the leading monthly consumer sentiment survey, the Consumer Attitudes, Sentiments and Expectations in Australia (CASiE) Survey, to study how shifts in economic expectations align with changes in voting behaviour.

    Support for minor parties and independents has been rising

    In the 2007 federal election, minor parties and independents won just 15% of first‑preference votes and two seats in the House of Representatives. By 2022 their primary vote had doubled to 31.7%, delivering a record 16 seats.

    In the latest federal election, their first‑preference share rose further to 33.4% (as of May 14). But because of preference flows, they secured fewer lower house seats than in 2022. The underlying shift away from the major parties therefore continues, even though it is not reflected in seat numbers.

    This realignment has unfolded alongside a sustained slide in political trust. Surveys such as the Australian Election Study show satisfaction with democracy is at its lowest level on record.

    The decline is often linked to perceptions of poor economic management, leadership instability, and unresponsive government. Voters repeatedly cite housing affordability, cost‑of‑living pressures and difficulty accessing health care as unmet concerns.

    Minor party support differs across demographic groups

    The shift away from the political mainstream is broadly distributed across demographic groups, indicating widespread economic disaffection rather than isolated grievances.

    Younger Australians, facing acute economic challenges, have increasingly supported the Greens. Older voters have turned to One Nation and Teals amid broader dissatisfaction with economic management.

    Support for minor parties and independents has climbed among both men and women, though the pattern differs. Women lean more toward the Greens; men more toward other minors and independents.

    Economic pessimism matters at the ballot box

    Rising economic pessimism, along with other social and cultural factors, has been a driving force behind the collapse in support for the political mainstream.

    Since 2010, the average share of Australians saying their finances have improved over the past 12 months fell from 27% to 20%. The share reporting deterioration increased from 34% to 37%. That means a net shift of 10 percentage points toward pessimism.

    Looking ahead, more Australians expect their household finances and the national economy to worsen over the next year than to improve.

    The charts below show support for minor parties has climbed across the board since the mid‑2010s. It is consistently highest among voters who expect their household finances and the national economy to get worse.

    Voters who feel worse off have consistently been more inclined to back minor parties or independents. The gap between pessimists and optimists has widened under both Coalition and Labor administrations.

    The divergence is most pronounced for expectations about national economic conditions. This suggests political disaffection is increasingly linked to pessimism about Australia’s economic outlook.

    Growing economic pessimism is consistent with a broader picture of weaker economic growth, lower living standards, a fall in productivity and slower wage growth over the past decade.

    For example, economic growth (gross domestic product or GDP after inflation) slowed from an average of 3.5% between 1995 and 2009 to 2.4% between 2010 and 2024. Growth in GDP per person, a more direct measure of living standards, slowed even more, from an average of 2.1% to just 0.9%.

    Since both actual and perceived economic conditions influence voting choices, collapsing support for mainstream political parties is perhaps no surprise.

    Voters are increasingly drifting towards the minor parties.
    Ymgerman/Shutterstock

    Implications for the future

    Because of the complex flow of voting preferences, a smaller vote share going to major parties does not always translate into fewer seats in parliament. However, vote shares and seat counts tend to be highly correlated over time.

    Sustained declines in primary vote shares going to the major parties will eventually translate into reduced legislative power.

    The trends in Australia’s voting patterns are consistent with voters’ growing dissatisfaction with the performance of successive governments.

    While the rise of non-mainstream parties may signal political renewal, it also carries risks. In the absence of credible responses to persistent social and economic challenges, political resentment is likely to deepen.

    Decades of policy responses have failed to address the scale or structural nature of the country’s economic problems. This has contributed to mounting pressures.

    Without meaningful reform, Australia risks following the trajectory seen in parts of Europe and the US, where the weakening of mainstream parties has created space for more radical and anti-democratic political movements.

    Ferdi Botha receives funding from ARC Centre of Excellence for Children and Families over the Life Course.

    Kyle Peyton and Viet Nguyen do not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and have disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    – ref. Economic pessimism is behind the drift of voters to minor parties and independents – https://theconversation.com/economic-pessimism-is-behind-the-drift-of-voters-to-minor-parties-and-independents-256322

    MIL OSI Analysis – EveningReport.nz –

    May 15, 2025
  • MIL-Evening Report: Whatever happened to Barbie’s feet? Podiatrists studied 2,750 dolls to find out

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Cylie Williams, Professor, School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Monash University

    elinaxx1v/Shutterstock

    What do you get when a group of podiatrists (and shoe lovers) team up with a Barbie doll collector? A huge opportunity to explore how Barbie reflects changes in the types of shoes women wear.

    It all started with the blockbuster Barbie movie in 2023. In particular, we discussed a scene when Barbie was distressed to find she didn’t have to walk on tip-toes. She could walk on flat feet.

    Soon, we had designed a research project to study the feet of Barbie dolls on the market from her launch in 1959 to June 2024. That’s 2,750 Barbies in all.

    How this scene from the Barbie movie inspired our research project.

    In our study published today, we found a general shift away from Barbie’s iconic feet – on tip-toes, ready to slip on high-heeled shoes – to flat feet for flat shoes.

    We found, like many women today, Barbie “chooses” her footwear depending on what she has to do – flats for skateboarding or working as an astronaut but heels when dressing up for a night out.

    We also question whether high heels that Barbie and some women choose to wear are really as bad for your health as we’ve been led to believe.

    The movie that sparked the #barbiefootchallenge

    Barbie’s feet – in particular her tip-toe posture – triggered TikTok’s #barbiefoottrend and #barbiefootchallenge. When the movie was released, fans made videos to re-create how Barbie stepped out of her high-heeled shoes, yet stayed on tip-toes. Margot Robbie, the Australian actor who played Barbie in the movie, was even interviewed about it.

    Despite the obvious interest in Barbie’s iconic foot stance, there had been no specific research on her feet or choice of footwear.

    So our research team decided to look at how Barbie’s feet had changed over the years to reflect the kinds of shoes she’s worn, and how that ties in with her different jobs and growing diversity.

    What we did

    One of our research team has an extensive Barbie doll collection. This guided our search through online catalogues to examine the foot positions of 2,750 Barbie dolls.

    Our custom-made audit tool allowed us to classify Barbie’s foot posture as tip-toe (known as equinus) or flat.

    We also looked at when the dolls were made, whether they were diverse or inclusive (for instance, represented people with disabilities), and whether Barbie was employed.

    Our device allowed us to classify Barbie’s feet as (a) tip-toe (equinus) or (b) flat.
    Cylie Williams, CC BY-NC-ND

    What we found

    We were surprised that Barbie’s high-heel wearing foot posture was no longer the norm. Barbie does, however, still wear high heels when dressed for fun.

    We found, just like Barbie in the movie, she’s made a transition from high heels (equinus foot posture) to flat shoes (flat foot posture), especially when employed.

    We suggest this mirrors broader societal changes. This includes how women choose footwear according to how much they have to move in the day, and away from only wearing high heels in some workplaces.

    Barbie ditched her high-heel wearing foot posture as she climbed the career ladder. In the 1960s, all Barbies tip-toed around, but by the 2020s, only 40% did.

    Meanwhile, her resume expanded, going from not being represented as having a job to 33% representing real-world jobs.

    Barbie’s been an astronaut since before the Moon landing.
    8th.creator/Shutterstock

    She was an astronaut in 1965, before the Moon landing, and a surgeon when the vast majority of doctors in the United States were men.

    US laws changed in the late 80s, supporting women to own businesses without a man’s permission. And Barbie mirrored this.

    She started trading stilettos for flats and strutting into male-dominated fields. Barbie didn’t just break the mould, she kicked it off with low-heeled shoes.

    Barbie also evolved to better reflect the population. We found a moderate link between her having flat feet and representing diversity or disability.

    For example, she chooses a stable flat shoe when using a prosthetic limb. But it was also great to see her break footwear stereotypes by wearing high heels when using a wheelchair.

    Are high heels so bad?

    Some celebrities, the media and public health advice warn against wearing high heels. But we know women (and Barbie) choose to wear them from time to time. In fact it’s discussions about women’s shoe choices that also gave us the idea for this fun research.

    For instance, health professionals often link high-heeled shoes with developing bunions, knee osteoarthritis, back pain or being injured.

    However bunions, and knee and back pain are just as common in people who don’t wear high heels.

    Studies exploring the risk of high heels are also often performed with people who don’t usually wear high heels, or during competitive sports.

    We couldn’t find any investigations exploring the long-term effect of wearing high heels.

    Research does show that high-heeled shoes make you walk slower and make it harder to balance.

    But high heels have different features, such as heel height or shape. So different types of high heels probably present a different risk. That risk also probably differs from person to person, including how often they walk in heels.

    Lessons for all shoe lovers

    But back to Barbie and lessons we learned. We know Barbie is a social construct that reflects some aspects of the real world. She chooses heels when fashion is the goal and flat shoes when needing speed and stability.

    Rather than demonise high heels, messages about footwear need to evolve to acknowledge choice, and trust women can balance their own priorities and needs.

    As Barbie’s journey shows, women already make thoughtful shoe choices based on comfort, function and identity.

    Cylie Williams receives funding from the Medical Research Future Foundation. In the past five years, she has previously received research funding from the National Health and Medical Research Council, Department of Health and Aged Care (Australia), Bobux International Limited, Department of Health (Victoria) and Sports and Exercise Podiatry Australia.

    Helen Banwell is a practitioner member of the Podiatry Board of Australia.

    – ref. Whatever happened to Barbie’s feet? Podiatrists studied 2,750 dolls to find out – https://theconversation.com/whatever-happened-to-barbies-feet-podiatrists-studied-2-750-dolls-to-find-out-256211

    MIL OSI Analysis – EveningReport.nz –

    May 15, 2025
  • MIL-Evening Report: This 6-point plan can ease Australia’s gambling problems – if our government has the guts

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Charles Livingstone, Associate Professor, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University

    WHYFRAME/Shutterstock

    We have a refreshed and revitalised Australian government, enriched with great political capital.

    During the last term of parliament before the election, opportunities to address Australia’s raging gambling habit were neglected.

    Could this government now have enough authority and courage to take on the gambling ecosystem?

    A massive issue

    Australians are the world’s biggest gambling losers.

    Many attribute this to some inherent Australian trait. But what it really comes down to is the proliferation of gambling operators and their products.

    They’re everywhere, along with their marketing and promotion.

    Half of the gambling problems in Australia are associated with poker machines, ubiquitous in all states and territories other than Western Australia (WA).

    Consequently, and unsurprisingly, WA has the lowest rate of gambling harms. The state has 2,500 pokies at a single Perth casino and none in clubs or pubs.

    New South Wales boasts nearly 90,000 pokies, the highest pokie “density” in Australia, and its clubs and pubs make $8.1 billion a year.

    Overall, pokie losses in Australia total $15.8 billion per year.

    Wagering (betting on sport, racing and even elections), is now mainly online, and reaps another $8.4 billion in Australia. This is the fastest growing gambling sector, with growth, adjusted for inflation, of more than 45% between 2018-19 and 2022-23.

    Pokies grew by a more modest 7.6% during the same period. Only casinos went backwards.

    Overall, gambling costs Australians more than $32 billion annually.

    This has been fuelled by relentless promotion and marketing and the expansion of the gambling ecosystem: the network of commercial actors who reap a major dividend from gambling losses.

    It includes the bookies, pub and club chains as well as sporting leagues, financial services providers, software and game developers, charitable organisations, broadcasters, and state and territory governments.

    Of course, gambling comes at a cost: it is strongly linked to broken relationships, loss of assets, employment and educational opportunities, and crime rates.

    Intimate partner violence and neglect of children, along with poor mental and physical health, are also connected to gambling accessibility. As, unfortunately, is suicide.

    However, there are ways to reduce gambling harm.

    Six ways to tackle the problem

    1. First up, we need a national gambling regulator. This was an important recommendation in the 2023 report of the all-party parliamentary committee chaired by the late Peta Murphy.

    Currently, gambling is regulated by each state and territory. Some have reasonably robust systems in place. Others, somewhat less so. None are best practice.

    A national system is long overdue, as many gambling businesses operate across multiple Australian jurisdictions.

    In the absence of national regulation, the Northern Territory has become the de facto national regulator for online wagering. It offers a low-tax and arguably low intervention regulatory system.

    Yet the vast majority of losses from punters come in other jurisdictions.

    National regulation would also assist in standardising tax rates and maintaining reasonable uniform standards of regulation and enforcement.

    2. Poker machines are Australia’s biggest gambling problem, but a national precommitment scheme would provide a tool for people to manage their gambling.

    This proposal has been frequently mooted in Australia since the Productivity Commission recommended it in 2010.

    It has worked well in Europe: forms of it now operate in 27 European countries.

    Both Victoria and Tasmania have proposed it, as did the Perrottet government in the lead into the last NSW election.

    Unfortunately, the power of the pokie lobby, supercharged by the addiction surplus it reaps from punters, has slowed or stopped its implementation.

    But it’s eminently feasible and is highly likely to significantly reduce the harm of pokies.

    The technical challenges are far from insurmountable, despite what industry interests argue.




    Read more:
    Pokies line the coffers of governments and venues – but there are ways to tame this gambling gorilla


    3. Limiting accessibility to pokies is an important way to reduce harm.

    Nothing good happens in a pokie room after midnight, yet they are often open until 4am, with reopening time only a little later.

    Closing down venues after midnight and not opening until 10am would help a lot of people.

    4. We can’t talk about political access without considering some key tools of the gambling ecosystem.

    Pokie operators have enormous ability to influence politicians. Donations are a typical method to ensure access, backed up by the “revolving door” of post-politics jobs.

    Politicians also enjoy a stream of freebies from the gambling ecosystem, which allow these businesses to bend the ear of a guest for hours at a time, at lunch, over drinks, or during an event.

    To address this, we need better rules around acceptance of hospitality and gifts. Some states have moved towards such arrangements but there has been little action on the national front.

    5. Another major recommendation from the Murphy committee was the banning of online gambling ads.

    The majority of Australians want it to happen, and gambling ads are banned for almost all other forms of gambling.

    The special treatment for this rapidly growing, highly harmful gambling product makes no sense.

    6. Finally, we need to properly resource research into gambling harm and its prevention.

    Much gambling research (and its conferences) are funded by the gambling ecosystem, either directly or via representative organisations.

    This raises massive conflicts and has lead to a poor evidence base for policy making.

    The time is now

    Anything that stops people getting into trouble with gambling will be opposed by the gambling ecosystem because their best customers are those with the biggest losses.

    But nobody is saying we should do away with gambling.

    The evidence-based ideas above would help people with existing problems, and stop many more from ending up in trouble.

    Gambling is a problem we can solve.

    It does need political effort – but the Albanese government has the political capital to solve this problem.

    Charles Livingstone has received funding from the Victorian Responsible Gambling Foundation, the (former) Victorian Gambling Research Panel, and the South Australian Independent Gambling Authority (the funds for which were derived from hypothecation of gambling tax revenue to research purposes), from the Australian and New Zealand School of Government and the Foundation for Alcohol Research and Education, and from non-government organisations for research into multiple aspects of poker machine gambling, including regulatory reform, existing harm minimisation practices, and technical characteristics of gambling forms. He has received travel and co-operation grants from the Alberta Problem Gambling Research Institute, the Finnish Institute for Public Health, the Finnish Alcohol Research Foundation, the Ontario Problem Gambling Research Committee, the Turkish Red Crescent Society, and the Problem Gambling Foundation of New Zealand. He was a Chief Investigator on an Australian Research Council funded project researching mechanisms of influence on government by the tobacco, alcohol and gambling industries. He has undertaken consultancy research for local governments and non-government organisations in Australia and the UK seeking to restrict or reduce the concentration of poker machines and gambling impacts, and was a member of the Australian government’s Ministerial Expert Advisory Group on Gambling in 2010-11. He is a member of the Lancet Public Health Commission into gambling, and of the World Health Organisation expert group on gambling and gambling harm. He made a submission to and appeared before the HoR Standing Committee on Social Policy and Legal Affairs inquiry into online gambling and its impacts on those experiencing gambling harm.

    Angela Rintoul holds a postdoctoral fellowship funded by Suicide Prevention Australia. In the past she has received funding from the Victoria Responsible Gambling Foundation, which was supported by allocations from the Community Support Fund, a government administered trust fund constituted from direct taxes on EGMs in hotels. She has also received funding from the Winston Churchill Memorial Trust and ANROWS. She is a member of the WHO meeting on gambling and received travel funding from the Turkish Green Crescent Society and consultancy funding from WHO. She has been paid to review grants by the British Academic Forum for the Study of Gambling, which administered via Gambling Research Exchange Ontario, funded by regulatory settlements from gambling companies who have breached the law.

    – ref. This 6-point plan can ease Australia’s gambling problems – if our government has the guts – https://theconversation.com/this-6-point-plan-can-ease-australias-gambling-problems-if-our-government-has-the-guts-256442

    MIL OSI Analysis – EveningReport.nz –

    May 15, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Global: Should AD stand for Alzheimer’s disease, or for Auguste Deter, the patient whose case was first described?

    Source: The Conversation – Canada – By Donald Weaver, Professor of Chemistry and Senior Scientist of the Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, University of Toronto

    Alzheimer’s disease is named for Alois Alheimer (left), but his patient, Auguste Deter (right), should not be overlooked. (Wikimedia Commons)

    Auguste Deter was born 175 years ago on May 16, 1850. Though the story of her life is not widely known, it should be. Through her suffering and dignity, Deter puts a much-needed human face on the tragedy of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), one of the most important medical problems currently confronting humankind. Auguste Deter reminds us that AD is a disease of people, not proteins.

    Often, scientists reduce AD to a disorder of shrunken brain cells or misfolded proteins. However, AD is so much more.

    It is a disease that impairs thought processes and personal memories — the very essence of what makes each one of us an individual capable of hopes, dreams, love and being loved. AD is a very human disease and a very human struggle for individuals, their families and society as a whole. Deter is a crucial reminder of the human aspects of this devastating disease.

    ‘I have lost myself’

    Although dementia had been recognized for centuries, Deter was the first person officially diagnosed with the type of dementia now recognized as Alzheimer’s disease.

    Auguste Deter was a patient of Alois Alzheimer. His report on her case was the first description of what is now Alzheimer’s disease.
    (Wikimedia Commons)

    Born Auguste Hochmann into a working-class family, the financial hardships imposed by her father’s early death forced Deter into full-time employment as a seamstress at age 14. She continued this work until marrying Karl Deter, a railway clerk. The couple moved to Frankfurt, Germany where they lived as a happy and harmonious family with their daughter, Thekla.

    Tragically in the spring of 1901, this loving and caring 51-year-old woman began to be incapable of routine household activities. Soon, due to her progressive memory loss and intellectual impairment, she was no longer able to function on her own. She was admitted to the Frankfurt Psychiatric Hospital under the care of Dr. Alois Alzheimer.

    Alzheimer asked her many questions to which she would sometimes quietly reply “Ich habe mich verloren.” (“I have lost myself.”) Sadly, her relentless cognitive decline continued. On July 12, 1905, Alzheimer recorded that Deter’s deterioration had progressed such that she was lying on her side in a pool of urine, knees drawn up, unable to communicate. She died on April 8, 1906 from pneumonia and infected bed sores.

    Definitive features

    Alois Alzheimer.
    (Provided by U.S. National Library of Medicine)

    During the subsequent autopsy, Alzheimer identified not only Deter’s marked brain shrinkage but also localized clumps (“plaques”) of an unknown deposited substance as well as dense bundles of tangled fibres in what were once healthy brain cells.

    These latter two observations — now recognized as amyloid plaques and tau tangles — have become the diagnostic features that define the pathology of AD. In 1907, Alzheimer published a scientific paper in which he described Deter’s brain and her “new” type of dementia.

    Unfortunately, Alzheimer was unable to dedicate a long career to a more comprehensive understanding of this disease. He contracted rheumatic fever in 1912, dying of its complications three years later at age 51. Nonetheless, the Deter case report was sufficient to establish his legacy as the discoverer of Alzheimer’s disease.

    As an inquisitive psychiatrist and pathologist, Alzheimer had been interested in medicine and science, not fame. He was not seeking to name a disease after himself. In 1910, Alzheimer’s boss, the renowned German psychiatrist Emil Kraepelin, wrote the influential Handbook of Psychiatry – a textbook in which he named this newly identified type of dementia “Alzheimer’s Disease.” In doing so, Kraepelin’s textbook ultimately transformed Alzheimer’s name into a household word.

    Meanwhile, in Prague

    But does Alzheimer’s disease truly deserve to be called Alzheimer’s disease? There are other people who can claim contributions to the discovery of Alzheimer’s disease.

    In 1907, the same year that Alzheimer published his single case description of Deter, a Czech psychiatrist named Oskar Fischer independently published a thorough structural analysis of plaques in the brains of 12 people with dementia. Between 1910-1912, he went on to analyze plaques and pathological brain changes in another 58 cases of dementia.

    Oskar Fischer.
    (Wikimedia Commons)

    Arguably, Fischer made more important contributions than Alzheimer to the comprehensive description of the disease. Yet it is called Alzheimer’s disease, not Fischer’s disease.

    There are many reasons for this. Fischer was Jewish and subject to antisemitism. He was not at a prominent German university and did not have a powerful ally like Emil Kraepelin promoting his career. And science is, after all, a very human activity.

    Unfortunately, Fischer later became trapped in occupied Prague under the oppression of authoritarian Nazi rule. Fischer was arrested in 1941 and died in the Gestapo’s notorious Small Fortress prison on Feb. 28, 1942.

    It seemed likely that Fischer’s seminal contributions to our understanding of dementia would be lost. Thankfully in 2008, Michel Goedert of Cambridge University rediscovered Fischer’s significant contributions stored in the archives of Charles University in Prague. This has restored Fischer to his rightful position as one of the discoverers of AD and retrospectively raises questions about the correct naming attribution of AD.

    However, when considering the naming of AD, we must not forget Patient No. 1: Auguste Deter. Interestingly and fortuitously, her initials are AD. So, should AD signify Auguste Deter disease rather than Alzheimer’s disease? Should the Alzheimer-Fischer controversy be resolved by simply reassigning the AD abbreviation to Auguste Deter? Should the disease be named after its “first patient,” rather than the physician(s) who discovered it?

    Medicine has a penchant for naming signs, symptoms and diseases after the physicians who first described them. We typically tend not to name them after the afflicted person. Perhaps this is done to preserve patient confidentiality; perhaps not.

    But AD is a disease like no other. It’s very personal. It affects the memories, thoughts and emotions that define us as human beings. We must never forget that AD is a disease of people and families, not just proteins and fibrils. Deter tragically yet courageously embodies the human heartbreak of this dreadful disease.

    Deter’s contribution to the 1907 single case report study by Alzheimer was immense: Deter’s life, illness and death are the story of AD. Deter should be remembered. It was and is her disease.

    Donald Weaver does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    – ref. Should AD stand for Alzheimer’s disease, or for Auguste Deter, the patient whose case was first described? – https://theconversation.com/should-ad-stand-for-alzheimers-disease-or-for-auguste-deter-the-patient-whose-case-was-first-described-255942

    MIL OSI – Global Reports –

    May 15, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Senator Murray, WA Broadband Office, Digital Equity Advocates Slam Trump for Ripping Away Resources to Close Digital Divide

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Washington State Patty Murray
    ICYMI: Senator Murray Blasts Trump’s Attack on Resources to Close Digital Divide: “Republicans Will Have to Explain Why Middle Schoolers in Rural Districts Shouldn’t Get Laptops”
    Murray first authored and introduced the Digital Equity Act in 2019 and got it passed into law as part of the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law
    ***WATCH FULL PRESS CONFERENCE HERE; DOWNLOAD HERE***
    Washington, D.C. — Today, U.S. Senator Patty Murray (D-WA), Vice Chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee, and author of the Digital Equity Act, held a virtual press conference in response to President Trump illegally blocking funding from the Digital Equity Act after falsely attacking the law as “racist” and “unconstitutional.” Murray first authored and introduced the Digital Equity Act in 2019 and got it passed into law as part of the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law. Joining Senator Murray for the call were Aaron Wheeler, Director of the Washington State Broadband Office, and Angela Siefer, Executive Director of the National Digital Inclusion Alliance (NDIA).
    Senator Murray’s Digital Equity Act passed with overwhelming bipartisan support in 2022 and provides $2.75 billion to help cities, states, and Tribes close the digital divide by providing individuals and communities with the skills, supports, and technologies necessary to take full advantage of a broadband internet connection—from helping seniors get online to ensuring students in every classroom have the tools they need to succeed.
    “A President cannot overrule a law—period. And certainly not through a tweet. But that hasn’t stopped this administration from illegally blocking the funding from the Digital Equity Act to all 50 states. I passed this law in 2021 as a part of the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law—and I actually first introduced the bill in 2019 to help close the digital divide, even before COVID,” said Senator Murray. “I worked hard and built a massive coalition of support for the Digital Equity Act and I worked really hard to make sure Republicans would be on board too—Senator Portman from Ohio co-led the bill with me. And guess what? Digital Equity passed with overwhelming bipartisan support. And that’s because my Republican colleagues have heard the same stories as I have—like kids in rural communities forced to drive to McDonalds parking lots for Wi-Fi to do their homework… It is insane—absolutely nuts—that Trump is blocking resources to help make sure kids in rural school districts can get hotspots or laptops, all because he doesn’t like the word equity! This administration’s deranged obsession with forcing extremist right-wing culture wars on all of us is not an acceptable or legal reason to deny states access to these funds.”
    “Canceling contracts related to Washington State’s $15.9 million Digital Equity Capacity Grant will severely hinder our efforts to close the digital divide,” said Aaron Wheeler, Director of the Washington State Broadband Office. “Cutting this vital program will expose millions of Washington residents to cyber risks, weaken the economic framework of Washington’s communities, and set back educational and workforce opportunities. And the long-term costs of security breaches, cyber theft and public trust will outweigh any short-term budget savings… Our team had just awarded our Advanced Cybersecurity Literacy Program grant to begin the state’s efforts to develop a curriculum that would have rolled out across the state to help educate and protect vulnerable individuals who are often targets of online scams. Then we got the federal notice that our grant had been canceled. We have all seen stories about victims of these complex online crimes and the impact they can have when they fall victim to online fraud. Our cybersecurity work would have helped prevent this by providing education about the online risks everyone faces. The program would have provided the tools people need to avoid these scams.”
    “The Digital Equity Act passed with overwhelming bipartisan support in Congress to help close the digital divide in rural, urban, and Tribal communities. Fifty states and six territories are counting on these funds to implement essential programs, and that work is already underway. NDIA is one of 65 projects recommended for award, and our subgrantees were prepared to launch 13 programs in 11 states beginning on March 1. NDIA’s shovel-ready projects alone would have supported over 30,000 people in applying for jobs, talking to their doctors, completing homework assignments, and learning to avoid online scams. We are grateful to Senator Murray for standing up for this vital work and the communities that cannot afford to be left behind,” said Angela Siefer, Executive Director of the National Digital Inclusion Alliance (NDIA).
    Senator Murray first introduced the Digital Equity Act in 2019 and worked hard to build a robust coalition of 100+ organizations to secure strong bipartisan consensus and support for her legislation, ultimately passing it into law as a part of the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law. Senator Murray’s Digital Equity Act provided $2.75 billion to establish three federal grant programs, administered by the NTIA, to promote digital equity nationwide by:
    Building Capacity within States through Formula Grants: Creates a five-year $300 million per year formula grant program for all 50 States, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico to fund the creation and implementation of comprehensive digital equity plans in each State.
    Spurring Targeted Action through Competitive Grants: Creates a five-year $250 million per year competitive grant program to support digital inclusion projects undertaken by individual groups, coalitions, and/or communities of interest.
    Supporting Research and Evidence-Based Policymaking: Tasks NTIA with evaluating digital equity projects and providing policymakers at the local, state, and federal levels with detailed information about which projects are most effective.
    Digital equity funds can be used in all kinds of ways to support Washington state families and our economy:
    Workforce: supporting the work of local workforce boards, community and technical colleges, and community-based organizations by increasing access to devices across underserved populations, increasing the digital skills of Washington’s current and future workforce, and by increasing the accessibility of state and local resources to workers.
    Education: supporting Washington’s public schools, community and technical colleges, and community-based organizations as they work to integrate technology literacy and fluency in their curriculum, reducing barriers and advancing access to technology, including digital devices, internet connection, and digital skills training.
    Health Care: supporting the Washington Department of Health and the Washington State Health Care Authority in expanding opportunities for Washingtonians to access telehealth services, reducing the need to travel long distances in rural areas for preventative and specialist care. Additionally, the digital equity funds could be used to work with partner organizations to expand the availability and awareness of culturally sensitive and linguistically accessible online healthcare resources and services.
    And much more.
    Senator Murray’s remarks, as delivered, are below and HERE:
    “Thank you everyone for joining. I wish we didn’t need to have this call today, but as usual President Trump is spouting off about something he has no clue about—and he’s making it everyone else’s problem.
    “Last week, on a Thursday afternoon President Trump suddenly decided to ‘declare’ the Digital Equity Act, a bipartisan law that I wrote, unconstitutional. Needless to say, a President cannot overrule a law—period. And certainly not through a tweet. But that hasn’t stopped this administration from illegally blocking the funding from the Digital Equity Act to all 50 states.
    “I passed this law in 2021 as a part of the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law—and I actually first introduced the bill in 2019 to help close the digital divide, even before COVID.
    “I remember being in Forks Washington back in 2019, a very remote part of my state on the Olympic Peninsula talking about this bill. A local math teacher told me when it came to high-speed internet and digital resources, they felt like Port Townsend in the 1890s waiting for rail—for anyone who’s not familiar, the train never did make it over the mountains to Port Townsend. But I was determined to not let history repeat itself with high-speed internet. 
    “So, I worked hard and built a massive coalition of support for the Digital Equity Act and I worked really hard to make sure Republicans would be on board too—Senator Portman from Ohio co-led the bill with me.
    “And guess what? Digital Equity passed with overwhelming bipartisan support. And that’s because my Republican colleagues have heard the same stories as I have—like kids in rural communities forced to drive to McDonalds parking lots for Wi-Fi to do their homework. That shouldn’t happen in America!
    “Everyone agrees the federal government has a role to play in closing the digital divide. This isn’t a partisan issue. That’s why we saw public statements of support for Digital Equity dollars from Democrats and Republicans.
    “Every single state—all 50 of them—submitted a plan to the Biden administration to qualify for Digital Equity dollars, outlining exactly how they would use these funds and why they needed them.
    “Not a single Republican governor in 2024 felt the law was unconstitutional then—certainly none of them thought it was ‘racist’ or ‘illegal’ like the President is saying.
    “That’s why people as conservative as the Republican governors of Montana and Ohio were touting Digital Equity dollars. Even Kristi Noem’s administration made certain to plaster her name all over the digital equity plan they submitted to the Biden administration.
    “Everyone wanted Digital Equity dollars—and listen, call it digital equity or digital opportunity, the money does the same thing! So why is the President all of a sudden doing this?
    “It is insane—absolutely nuts—that Trump is blocking resources to help make sure kids in rural school districts can get hotspots or laptops, all because he doesn’t like the word equity!
    “This administration’s deranged obsession with forcing extremist right-wing culture wars on all of us is not an acceptable or legal reason to deny states access to these funds.
    “Whether it’s helping veterans in Ohio navigate the VA benefits available to them online or making sure seniors in rural Texas can access telehealth resources—Trump is stealing from every state in America.
    “Democrats will fight this every step of the way, but my Republican colleagues will need to explain to their constituents why middle schoolers in rural districts shouldn’t get laptops.
    “With that, I’m glad to turn it over to Aaron Wheeler who knows better than anyone that Digital Equity dollars will help everyone—in every community, in every part of Washington state.”

    MIL OSI USA News –

    May 15, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: “NIH Cuts Will Hurt” RFK Jr. Admits When Pressed by Senator Murray On Harm to NIH Clinical Care, Confronted with Constituent’s Personal Story

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Washington State Patty Murray
    In response to question about Trump’s proposal to nearly halve the NIH’s budget, Kennedy concedes “I think the cuts that are now proposed by NIH are gonna hurt.”
    ICYMI: In Seattle, Senator Murray Highlights Consequences of Trump & Elon’s Cuts & Layoffs at NIH—Hears from Leading Researchers, Patients, and Early Career Scientists
    ***WATCH: Senator Murray’s remarks and questioning of Secretary Kennedy***
    ***WATCH: Senator Murray rebuts Secretary Kennedy’s claims about her constituent, Natalie***
    Washington, D.C. — Today, at a Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee hearing with U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., U.S. Senator Patty Murray (D-WA), a senior member and former Chair of the HELP Committee, grilled Secretary Kennedy on how the Trump administration is endangering Americans’ health and safety by slashing staff and blocking funding at the National Institute of Health (NIH) and firing nearly 90 percent of staff at the CDC’s National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), including nearly 100 staff in Spokane.
    In their unprecedented and reckless effort to gut HHS—including pushing out 20,000 HHS employees and defunding critical research—President Trump and Secretary Kennedy are creating total chaos, delaying funding and stalling research for lifesaving treatments and cures, weakening our biomedical workforce, cancelling vital ongoing studies and delaying clinical trials, and threatening to undo decades of hard-won progress.
    Senator Murray began by sharing the story of her constituent, Natalie Phelps of Washington state: “One of my constituents, Natalie Phelps—a mom of two from Bainbridge Island in Washington state. She has been fighting aggressive Stage Four colorectal cancer for nearly five years now. Her best hope now is a clinical trial at the NIH Clinical Center. She flew out to the NIH just a few weeks ago for her first appointment, and her care team wanted her to come back in four weeks to start treatment. But because of the thoughtless, mass firing of thousands of critical employees across NIH and HHS that you have carried out, Natalie’s doctors at that clinical center have told her that they have no choice but to delay her treatment by an additional four weeks. Now, an extra four weeks may not sound like a long time but, I will tell you, for Stage Four cancer patients like Natalie, this could mean the difference between life and death.”
    Senator Murray asked Secretary Kennedy, “How many staff have been cut from the NIH’s Clinical Center? I want a specific number.”
    “I can’t tell you that now, Senator Murray. What I can tell you is that if you contact my office tomorrow, I’ll look specifically into that,” replied Secretary Kennedy.
    Senator Murray pressed, “Well, that is not acceptable. I want an answer back [on] that. She deserves it. She doesn’t have much time. She deserves an answer back.”
    Secretary Kennedy demurred, again saying Murray should contact his office, and eventually stated: “I don’t think that should happen to anybody.”
    Senator Murray then pressed: “What have you—and I mean you personally—done to assess how these staff cuts are impacting patient care? She is one of many. What have you done to assess that?” Senator Murray
    Secretary Kennedy responded, “I’ve revised the guidelines and said we shouldn’t—no, no clinical trials should be affected by the cuts.”
    Senator Murray made clear: “Mr. Secretary, I just have a short amount of time. They [your cuts] are impacting clinical trials. … I want to tell you, you need to know this. Natalie, is sitting there waiting.”
    Secretary Kennedy then repeatedly interrupted. Senator Murray reclaimed her time and pressed further: “I am asking you a question and it is critical. You are here to defend cutting NIH by half. Do you genuinely believe that that won’t result in more stories like Natalie’s?”
    Secretary Kennedy responded: “I think the cuts that are now proposed by NIH are gonna hurt. I think President Trump – you know, there’s no agency head in government like myself who wants to see their budget cut.”
    After more back and forth, Senator Murray stated: “Well, I will just say that it is my job to be a voice for people like Natalie and countless other patients who are like her. So you’ve got to fix this. I want to know, and I want a personal update on Natalie’s case, and you’ve offered that, please give that to me in the next 24 hours, and I expect details and transparency about the state of NIH clinical care.”
    Senator Murray continued her questioning by pressing Secretary Kennedy on the decimation of NIOSH and mass firings, including at the NIOSH Spokane Research Laboratory in Eastern Washington, which is the largest NIOSH facility west of the Mississippi River. Senator Murray has slammed the Trump administration for eviscerating the NIOSH Laboratory in Spokane as part of their mass layoffs. “I’m alarmed by your decision to essentially eliminate the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health,” said Senator Murray. “You have already fired nearly 90 percent of staff. That includes the staff in my state at the Spokane Research Lab. Those are experts who do essential work to protect miners and firefighters and farm workers and people who are working in dangerous conditions. I am told that after backlash, you are reinstating some of those, mainly in the West Virginia office … nobody in the Western United States, and there doesn’t seem to be any rhyme or reason as to how you’ve made these decisions. And how do you explain this to my constituents in Spokane, who are out of a job, and the workers that are being impacted by that.”
    Secretary Kennedy confirmed that he has brought back some of the workers he’d fired after facing backlash, but did not provide a rationale for the cuts in Washington, stating in part: “The work at NIOSH will not be interrupted. We’re going – I brought back 328 workers, mainly in the Cleveland office and the Morgantown office, and for the World Trade Center site. And that work will continue. The work on mine safety will continue.” However, critical mine safety research occurred at the Spokane lab—and Secretary Kennedy failed to provide any explanation for those cuts—or a commitment to rehire those workers. (Secretary Kennedy also misstated the number of fired workers that have since been rehired and where they work: 313, not 328, have been rehired, and the office in question is Cincinnati, not Cleveland.)
    Senator Murray concluded: “Mr. Chairman, I would just say you can’t fire 90 percent of the people and assume the work gets done.”
    Later in the hearing, Secretary Kennedy asserted that Natalie was ineligible for her clinical trial and called her story a “canard,” saying: “Senator Murray had raised the issue of a constituent of hers who she said had been denied a place in a clinical trial in Washington due to the RIF. We’ve been able to run down that case. The patient was medically ineligible for that trial. It had nothing to do with the RIF. And NIH has been trying to get her into another clinical trial, but none of our clinical trials have been shut down because of the RIF. That was a canard.”
    Senator Murray returned to the hearing to respond directly to Secretary Kennedy: “Secretary Kennedy came back and said my constituent, who I spoke about earlier, [her care] was not delayed by staffing cuts. First off, she is already enrolled in that clinical trial. It’s not a question of eligibility—the issue, as I stated clearly, was the delay in care that she got. And what you stated, Secretary Kennedy, is not true.”
    “I spoke with Natalie, actually, last night. She asked her NIH doctor directly why, when she was informed of the delay, and her doctor at NIH said very plainly TWICE: her care was delayed because of staffing cuts. And Mr. Chairman, I think it’s important for the record to show, my staff has put in inquiries with HHS leadership and they’ve been unresponsive so far.And, just to make clear, this is just one case of many. But those are the facts,” Senator Murray said.
    ___________________________________
    Senator Murray has been a leading voice in Congress raising the alarm over HHS’ unilateral reorganization plan and slamming the closure of the HHS Region 10 office in Seattle and the CDC’s National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) Spokane Research Laboratory. Senator Murray has sent oversight letters and hosted numerous press conferences and events to lay out how the administration’s reckless gutting of HHS is risking Americans health and safety and will set our country back decades, and lifting up the voices of HHS employees who were fired for no reason and through no fault of their own.
    In particular, Senator Murray has been leading the charge against the Trump administration’s efforts to gut lifesaving research at NIH and pushed out nearly 5,000 NIH skilled scientists, grants administrators, and other employees at the agency. When the Trump administration attempted to illegally cap indirect cost rates at 15 percent, Senator Murray immediately and forcefully condemned the move, led the entire Senate Democratic caucus in a letter decrying the proposed change, and introduced amendments to Senate Republicans’ budget resolution to reverse it, which Republicans blocked. Murray has led Congressional efforts to boost biomedical research. Previously, over her years as Chair of the Labor-HHS Appropriations Subcommittee, Senator Murray secured billions of dollars in increases for biomedical research at NIH, and during her time as Chair of the HELP Committee she established the new ARPA-H research agency as part of her PREVENT Pandemics Act to advance some of the most cutting-edge research in the field. Senator Murray was also the lead Democratic negotiator of the bipartisan 21st Century Cures Act, which delivered a major federal investment to boost NIH research, among many other investments. 
    Senator Murray forcefully opposed the nomination of notorious anti-vaccine activist RFK Jr. to be Secretary of HHS, and she has long worked to combat vaccine skepticism and highlight the importance of scientific research and vaccines. Murray was also a leading voice against the nomination of Dr. Dave Weldon to lead CDC, repeatedly speaking up about her serious concerns with the nominee immediately after their meeting. In 2019, Senator Murray co-led a bipartisan hearing in the HELP Committee on vaccine hesitancy and spoke about the importance of addressing vaccine skepticism and getting people the facts they need to keep their families and communities safe and healthy. Ahead of the 2019 hearing, as multiple states were facing measles outbreaks in under-vaccinated areas, Murray sent a bipartisan letter with former HELP Committee Chair Lamar Alexander pressing Trump’s CDC Director and HHS Assistant Secretary for Health on their efforts to promote vaccination and vaccine confidence.

    MIL OSI USA News –

    May 15, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Murray, Cantwell, Baldwin, Planned Parenthood Action Fund President Hold Press Conference Slamming Republican Effort to Defund Planned Parenthood, Pass Largest-Ever Cut to Medicaid

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Washington State Patty Murray
    ICYMI: Senator Murray Statement on House Republicans’ Bill to Defund Planned Parenthood, Slash Medicaid
    KFF Explainer: How Will the 2025 Budget Reconciliation Affect the ACA, Medicaid, and the Uninsured Rate?
    ***WATCH PRESS CONFERENCE HERE***
    Washington, D.C. — Today, U.S. Senators Patty Murray (D-WA), a senior member and former Chair of the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee, Maria Cantwell (D-WA), and Tammy Baldwin (D-WI) joined Planned Parenthood Action Fund President Alexis McGill Johnson and Planned Parenthood advocates in holding a press conference on the Republicans’ partisan reconciliation bill that includes provisions to “defund” Planned Parenthood and make the largest-ever cut to Medicaid in history.
    Republicans’ reconciliation bill, which only requires a simple majority to pass in each chamber of Congress, would result in at least 13.7 million people losing health insurance by 2034, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO)—this figure is a result of Republican cuts to Medicaid combined with Republicans’ refusal to extend Affordable Care Act tax credits and the Trump administration’s sabotage of the ACA marketplace. CBO estimates that the provision in House Republicans’ legislation defunding Planned Parenthood would increase the deficit by $300 million.
    “Republicans are gearing [up] to kick more than 8.6 million people off their health insurance, and while they are moving heaven and earth to extend tax cuts for the richest people on the planet, they are not so much as lifting a finger to save the health plan tax credits for working families—something that will push yet another 4 million people off their insurance… Because the brutal reality is that Republicans are not just taking away people’s health coverage, they also want to shut the doors on one of the biggest health care providers in the country. They want to defund Planned Parenthood,” said Senator Murray.“About three in four people say they oppose defunding Planned Parenthood health centers. But Republicans do not care—they need to appease their far-right, anti-choice fringe. Now this is going to hurt their own constituents, seeing as one in three women have been to a Planned Parenthood health center for care. But Republicans don’t care—after all, billionaire tax cuts won’t pay for themselves! Although the irony is, in this case, defunding Planned Parenthood would actually cost our country more money in the long term. CBO estimated yesterday that one provision in House Republicans’ bill would actually increase the deficit by $300 million dollars! And, defunding Planned Parenthood will cut off millions of patients from basic health care like cancer screenings, pap tests, birth control. But Republicans just don’t care—whatever Donald Trump wants, comes first for them. Well, I want everyone to know, Democrats do care. And we are not going to let Republicans blow past all the warning signs. Saving people’s access to basic health care—saving Planned Parenthood—is just too important.”
    One in three women have been to a Planned Parenthood health center for care and for many people, Planned Parenthood health centers are their only source of health care. Planned Parenthood is more popular than any elected official or party, and nearly three-quarters of voters, including more than half of Trump voters, oppose Congress taking away funds from Planned Parenthood health centers for providing birth control, wellness exams, and cancer screenings.
    “Make no mistake: The House’s reconciliation bill is targeting Planned Parenthood. By moving full steam ahead to push a dangerously unpopular agenda, House Republicans have shown they aren’t concerned about their constituents or cutting costs. This effort to ‘defund’ Planned Parenthood will threaten Americans’ health and futures, and leave a gap in care no other provider can fill. We cannot allow these lawmakers to play politics with health care. Planned Parenthood Action Fund is showing up every day with reproductive freedom champions like Sen. Patty Murray until we defeat this outrageous attack,” said Alexis McGill Johnson, President, Planned Parenthood Action Fund.
    “In the State of Washington, Planned Parenthood serves about 100,000 patients annually. So that just tells you, where are those 100,000 people going to go if you don’t have Medicaid as a reimbursement mechanism? About half of those patients rely on Medicaid,” Senator Cantwell said. “Small communities like Pullman, Washington, and other parts of Eastern Washington — where there are no other choices to deliver this kind of care — you’re asking people then to either do without care that might tell us something about a very pressing health care condition, or make you have to give up job time, or drive miles and miles and miles and miles, just to get the care you deserve.”
    “Plain and simple: Republicans are putting health care further out of reach for Americans, all because they need to give tax handouts to their rich friends. Planned Parenthood is a health care provider – they do cancer screenings, regular checkups, and so much more, but Republicans refuse to accept that and would rather try to score political points, so they are going to take that essential health care away from American families. It’s wrong and we are going to fight it,” said Senator Baldwin.
    Senator Murray is a longtime leader in the fight to protect and expand access to reproductive health care and abortion rights and is widely credited with holding the line against any budget deal that would cut funding for Planned Parenthood in 2011 and leading the fight to uphold President Obama’s policy requiring insurers to cover birth control as part of the Affordable Care Act. Murray has led Congressional efforts to fight back after the Supreme Court’s disastrous decision overturning Roe v. Wade, introducing more than a dozen pieces of legislation to protect reproductive rights from further attacks, protect providers, and help ensure women get the care they need; Murray has led efforts to push for passage of these bills on the floor multiple times. Last year, on the anniversary of Roe v. Wade, Murray led her colleagues in hosting a “State of Abortion Rights” briefing with women who have suffered firsthand from Republican abortion bans, and last June, she chaired a HELP Committee hearing titled “The Assault on Women’s Freedoms: How Abortion Bans Have Created a Health Care Nightmare Across America.” Murray helped lead efforts to force Republicans on the record on votes to protect access to contraception and access to IVF (twice), and led her colleagues in raising the alarm about the threat a second Trump administration poses to reproductive rights and abortion access in every state, as outlined in Project 2025.
    Senator Murray’s remarks, as delivered, are below and HERE:
    “Well, thank you all so much for joining us. We are here to raise the alarm as Republicans are now moving heaven and earth to gut health care in this country.
    “You know the saying ‘women and children first?’ Well for Republicans, billionaires go first—and women and children go overboard.
    “That’s essentially the principle they are writing into their reconciliation bill right now.
    “Despite all the warnings from families across the country—despite warnings from themselves, Republicans are gearing [up] to kick more than 8.6 million people off their health insurance.
    “And while they are moving heaven and earth to extend tax cuts for the richest people on the planet, they are not so much as lifting a finger to save the health plan tax credits for working families, something that will push yet another 4 million people off their insurance.
    “But it gets worse—much worse—and that’s what I want to remind everyone here today now.
    “Because the brutal reality is that Republicans are not just taking away people’s health coverage, they also want to shut the doors on one of the biggest health care providers in our country.
    “They want to defund Planned Parenthood.
    “That is wildly unpopular—about three in four people say they oppose defunding Planned Parenthood health centers. But Republicans do not care—they need to appease their far-right, anti-choice fringe.
    “Now this is going to hurt their own constituents, seeing as one in three women have been to a Planned Parenthood health center for care. But Republicans don’t care—after all, billionaire tax cuts won’t pay for themselves!
    “Although the irony is, in this case, defunding Planned Parenthood would actually cost our country more money in the long term. CBO estimated yesterday that one provision in House Republicans’ bill would actually increase the deficit by $300 million dollars!
    “And, defunding Planned Parenthood will cut off millions of patients from basic health care like cancer screenings, pap tests, birth control. But Republicans just don’t care—whatever Donald Trump wants, comes first.
    “Well I want everyone to know, Democrats do care. And we are not going to let Republicans blow past all the warning signs. Saving people’s access to basic health care—saving Planned Parenthood—is just too important.
    “We don’t have to guess at the stakes here—we already know from experience. We have seen exactly what has happened when Republican states have defunded Planned Parenthood: health care outcomes—worse, fewer patients receive care.
    “The fact of the matter is, if Republicans get their way—if they succeed in shutting the doors of Planned Parenthood clinics across the country—millions of women will have nowhere else to turn.
    “After all, two-thirds of Planned Parenthood health centers are in rural and medically underserved areas—places where there’s already a shortage of clinics and health care professionals. And for a lot of these patients, Planned Parenthood is literally the only provider in reach and in budget. They literally can’t afford to lose this care.
    “So, we are not going to stand by as Republicans try to cut off this lifeline, just so they can cut a massive check to billionaires like Trump and Elon Musk.
    “We are here today to put a bright and burning spotlight on the full extent of the destruction Republicans are planning. And to lift up the voices Republicans are most afraid of—the patients who they are trying to cut off from health care.”

    MIL OSI USA News –

    May 15, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Russia: World Conference on Digital Education 2025 Opens in Wuhan

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: People’s Republic of China in Russian – People’s Republic of China in Russian –

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    WUHAN, May 14 (Xinhua) — The 2025 World Conference on Digital Education kicked off Wednesday in Wuhan, central China’s Hubei Province. Chinese Vice Premier Ding Xuexiang attended the opening ceremony and delivered a speech.

    As Ding Xuexiang, also a member of the Standing Committee of the Politburo of the CPC Central Committee, emphasized, China pays close attention to the development of digital education.

    According to him, China, which is currently accelerating the construction of an educational power, will consistently promote digital transformation and intelligent upgrading of the education sector.

    Ding Xuexiang said that China is building a modern digital education system that is more equitable, has higher quality and intellectualization, and provides universal lifelong learning for the entire population.

    The Chinese vice premier called for harnessing the momentum of education development in the age of intelligence, deepening international cooperation in digital education, and accelerating the implementation of the UN Global Digital Compact.

    The 2025 Global Conference on Digital Education on “Education Development and Transformation: The Age of Intelligence” will run until May 16.

    The opening ceremony of the event was attended by more than 600 people, including officials from Chinese and foreign governments, heads of relevant international organizations, representatives from universities, primary and secondary schools, as well as experts and scholars. –0–

    MIL OSI Russia News –

    May 15, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: Investview, Inc. (“INVU”) Reports Financial Results and Current Operational and Financial Highlights for the First Quarter Ended March 31, 2025

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Haverford, PA, May 14, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Investview, Inc. (OTCQB: INVU), a diversified financial technology services company that offers multiple business units across key sectors, including a financial education division offering tools, products and content through a global network of independent distributors; a manufacturing division focused on proprietary aesthetics, health, nutrition, & cognitive wellness products for wholesale and retail markets, with strategic plans for global expansion; an early-stage online trading platform that intends to offer self-directed retail brokerage services; and a business unit that owns and operates a sustainable blockchain business focused on bitcoin mining, today reported its first quarter 2025 financial results and shared highlights of key operational progress, strategic milestones, and forward-focused initiatives.

    Summary Consolidated Financial Highlights:

    Results of Operations-Three Months Ended March 31, 2025 vs March 31, 2024

    • Gross Revenue (a Non-GAAP measure) decreased 35.3% to $10.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025, compared to $16.5 million for the comparable prior year period.
    • Net Revenue decreased 36.0% to $10.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025, compared to $15.7 million for the comparable prior year period.
    • Net cash used in operating activities was ($3.4) million for the three months ended March 31, 2025, compared to net cash provided by operating activities of $4.8 million for the comparable prior year period.
    • Net income from operations decreased 122.1% to ($0.4) million for the three months ended March 31, 2025, compared to net income from operations of $1.9 million for the comparable prior year period.

    Balance Sheet Data – March 31, 2025 vs December 31, 2024

    • Cash and cash equivalents at March 31, 2025 was $17.5 million, down $5.0 million or 22.1% from $22.5 million at December 31, 2024. The decrease was mainly attributable to a deposit to secure a writ of attachment order of $1.9 million in favor of the Company, an increase in bitcoin holdings of $0.5 million, an increase in prepaid assets of $0.8 million, purchases of inventory and manufacturing equipment of $0.7 million, and payments made under an agreement for the purchase of our common shares in a private transaction of $0.8 million.
    • Total assets decreased by $1.6 million or 5.2% to $29.9 million. Total liabilities decreased by $1.2 million or 8.7% to $13.1 million. Our current ratio remains strong at 2.29 as of March 31, 2025.
    • Working capital balance decreased by 6.1% at March 31, 2025, a decrease of $0.9 million from December 31, 2024.
    • Outstanding debt increased by $0.1 million to $3.3 million at March 31, 2025, up from $3.2 million at December 31, 2024.
    • Total stockholders’ equity at March 31, 2025 was $16.8 million, a decrease of $0.4 million, or 2.2%, from $17.2 million at December 31, 2024.

    Comments on our industry segments and business units

    Financial Education and Technology Segment

    iGenius net revenue in the first quarter of 2025 was $8.8 million, a decrease of $4.2 million or 32.5% over the comparable period in 2024. The decrease was largely attributable to a combination of shifts in consumer behavior and demand following the COVID-19 pandemic as individuals reassess their spending priorities, lifestyle choices, and engagement habits. Broader macroeconomic headwinds also contributed to a general slowdown in direct sales and home-based business sectors.

    Despite these challenges, iGenius remains optimistic about its long-term growth trajectory. The company is actively investing in the expansion of its sales network and is focused on broadening its portfolio of products and services. Management is confident that the core direct selling model remains robust and scalable, particularly as it evolves to include offerings beyond financial education.

    As part of its strategic vision, iGenius plans to strengthen its value proposition through the continued development of its myLife Wellness division, which includes health, beauty, and wellness products. These initiatives are expected to enhance engagement across the sales network and drive future growth opportunities.

    Our Blockchain Technology and Crypto Mining Products and Services Segment

    SAFETek net revenue in the first quarter of 2025 was $0.9 million, a decrease of $1.8 million or 67.3% over the comparable period. The decrease in net revenue was primarily driven by the April 2024 Bitcoin halving event, which reduced block rewards by 50%, a more than 3.5% increase in mining network difficulty for the period, and a government-mandated energy curtailment due to low hydroelectric reservoir levels in our host country.

    Despite a highly challenging environment, SAFETek successfully produced 9.12 Bitcoin during the first quarter of 2025. The company navigated the combined impact of tighter block rewards, escalating network difficulty, and energy restrictions, while simultaneously capitalizing on reduced power costs resulting from the curtailment, effectively turning operational adversity into a cost-management initiative that we expect will serve us well over time.

    In 2024, SAFETek proactively executed key strategic initiatives to fortify long-term operational efficiency. These included the retirement of legacy mining hardware, deployment of next-generation ASIC miners, and the consolidation of mining operations—collectively lowering our hash cost and enhancing our competitive position in the global mining landscape. Importantly, we remain debt-free on all equipment purchases and maintain a strong balance sheet that provides the financial flexibility to pursue selective expansion opportunities.

    SAFETek currently holds a reserve of nearly 2,900 mining machines, strategically positioned for deployment in qualified expansion scenarios. While the Bitcoin mining sector continues to evolve amid macroeconomic and protocol-level shifts, our outlook remains cautiously optimistic. We are committed to a disciplined, forward-looking strategy that prioritizes long-term sustainability and prepares us to scale when conditions improve.

    Our Manufacturing and Development of Health, Beauty and Wellness Products Segment

    In October 2024, we entered the over-the-counter health, beauty, and wellness market through our wholly owned subsidiary, myLife Wellness Company (“myLife Wellness”), with the strategic acquisition of Renu Laboratories, Inc. (“Renu Labs”), a contract developer and manufacturer of proprietary and non-proprietary products serving wholesale and retail clients. This acquisition marks a key milestone in our strategy to extend our platform into high-demand consumer verticals, with a growing focus on aesthetics, nutrition, and cognitive wellness.

    Since the acquisition, we have made accelerated investments in Renu Labs’ core capabilities, including upgraded equipment, enhanced production technology, and key talent recruitment, which have resulted in measurable gains in both production output and operational efficiency. Net revenue for the first quarter of 2025 totaled $0.4 million. Encouragingly, net revenue generated to date in the second quarter has already exceeded first-quarter results, signaling continued momentum.

    We are optimistic about Renu’s long-term growth trajectory and are focused on scaling manufacturing capacity while expanding our product portfolio and contract manufacturing (CMO) engagements with qualified partners. These steps are designed to position Renu as a nimble and scalable manufacturer in a market increasingly seeking trusted, innovative wellness product providers.

    As the commercial arm of this initiative, myLife Wellness will serve as both the marketing engine and e-commerce platform for the products developed and manufactured by Renu Labs. The brand’s growing product catalog, centered around aesthetics, health, nutrition, and cognitive wellness, is expected to be distributed through a combination of retail (B2C) and wholesale (B2B) channels.

    In addition to operating as a standalone consumer platform, myLife Wellness will also benefit from strategic collaboration with our iGenius subsidiary, enabling expanded access to retail, wholesale, and direct-to-consumer channels. This partnership is expected to significantly enhance market reach, while creating new revenue opportunities by introducing wellness products to a global member base and established consumer relationships.

    We believe this integrated ecosystem represents a powerful foundation for long-term value creation across the health and wellness space.

    Our Financial Services Initiatives

    In March 2024, we achieved a significant milestone in our fintech growth strategy with the acquisition of Opencash Securities LLC, an early-stage registered broker-dealer. While the platform has not yet commenced commercial operations, this acquisition represents a strategic foundation for building a modern, mobile-first trading experience to-be focused on accessibility, simplicity, and cost-efficiency for retail investors globally.

    Opencash is currently advancing through its final stages of development, including clearing integration, infrastructure buildout, and internal testing, in preparation for its commercial launch. Our goal is to establish Opencash as a low-cost, and commission-free platform offering trading in stocks, ETFs, and options, tailored to meet the expectations of today’s digitally native investor.

    The Opencash initiative is designed to work in tandem with our proprietary MPower Trading Systems – Prodigio trading engine, acquired in 2021. Once fully deployed, we expect to offer two complementary trading solutions under the Opencash brand:

    • Opencash – a streamlined platform for everyday retail investors
    • OpencashPro – a feature-rich platform for advanced traders and active investors

    Together, these platforms are expected to deliver a seamless, data-driven trading experience that integrates intelligent analytics, automation, and user-friendly interfaces, positioning us competitively in the evolving fintech landscape.

    We remain optimistic about the long-term potential of the Opencash platform and are committed to executing a disciplined phased rollout that prioritizes regulatory readiness, technological integrity, and a superior user experience.

    Operational Highlights (Quotes)

    Victor Oviedo, Investview CEO, commented, “during the first quarter of 2025, Investview continued to make strategic progress across its diversified operating segments. In our financial education and direct selling division, iGenius generated $8.8 million in net revenue. While this represented a material contraction in our business compared to the prior-year period, the business remains focused on long-term growth through the planned expansion of its global sales network and the planned integration of health and wellness offerings from myLife Wellness.

    “Our blockchain and crypto mining division, SAFETek, produced 9.12 Bitcoin during the quarter despite facing significant headwinds including the April 2024 halving event, a network difficulty increase of over 3.5%, and a government-mandated energy curtailment. These challenges were met with proactive operational adjustments, including the retirement of legacy hardware and the deployment of next-generation ASIC miners. SAFETek remains debt-free on all equipment purchases and holds a reserve of approximately 2,900 mining machines, preserving flexibility for future expansion.

    “In our health, beauty, and wellness segment, Renu Labs generated $0.4 million in net revenue for the quarter, with revenues to date in Q2 2025 already exceeding first-quarter results. Strategic investments in production technology, equipment, and personnel are expected to lead to continued improvements in output and efficiency. The Company continues to position itself as a nimble and scalable manufacturer serving both proprietary and third-party CMO clients.

    “Our fintech division also advanced with the continued development of Opencash Securities LLC. As a mobile-first platform for low-cost, and commission-free trading of stocks, ETFs, and options, “Opencash is progressing through clearing integration and platform testing in preparation for launch. The platform is expected to work in tandem with our MPower Prodigio trading engine, offering solutions for both retail and advanced traders under the Opencash and OpencashPro brands.

    “Investview ended the quarter with $17.5 million in cash and cash equivalents, $1.7 million in bitcoin, maintained a strong current ratio of 2.29 and had a working capital balance of $14.2 million, reflecting prudent financial management and positioning the company to capitalize on future growth opportunities across its expanding portfolio.”

    About Investview, Inc.

    Investview, Inc., a Nevada corporation, operates a financial technology (FinTech) services company, offering several different lines of business, including a Financial Education and Technology business that delivers a series of products and services involving financial education, digital assets and related technology, through a network of independent distributors; and a Blockchain Technology and Crypto Mining Products and Services business, including leading-edge research, development and FinTech services involving the management of digital asset technologies with a focus on Bitcoin mining and the new generation of digital assets. In addition, we are in the process of creating a Brokerage and Financial Markets business within the investment management and brokerage industries by, among others, commercializing on a proprietary trading platform we acquired in September 2021. For more information on Investview, please visit: www.investview.com.

    About Opencash Securities LLC

    Brokerage services are provided by Opencash Securities LLC, a member of FINRA and SIPC. Options involve risk and are not suitable for all investors. Please review Characteristics and Risks of Standardized Options prior to engaging in options trading. Opencash Securities LLC does not provide investment advice. Please consult with investment, tax, or legal professionals before making any investment decisions. All investments involve risks, including the possible loss of capital. Check the background of this investment professional on BrokerCheck. Opencash Securities LLC is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Investview, Inc.

    Forward-Looking Statement

    All statements in this release that are not based on historical fact are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Forward-looking statements, which are based on certain assumptions and describe our future plans, strategies, and expectations, can generally be identified by the use of forward-looking terms such as “believe,” “expect,” “may,” “should,” “could,” “seek,” “intend,” “plan,” “goal,” “estimate,” “anticipate” or other comparable terms. These forward-looking statements are based on Investview’s current beliefs and assumptions and information currently available to Investview and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance, or achievements of the Company to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. Our forward-looking statements expect that we will be able to expand the scope and scale of our iGenius network, despite the recent material contractions in its business. Our forward-looking statements also expect that we will ultimately be able to develop retail brokerage operations at Opencash, although it is currently in the pre-revenue and early stage of its operations. We plan to do this by, among others, investing the funds we believe are necessary to develop the infrastructure necessary to achieve retail operations. This includes, among others, the on-boarding of customer support personnel and software developers, the development and implementation of a marketing strategy, the securing of necessary securities clearing arrangements, and the continued development of the online Opencash trading platform and completing its integration with the proprietary algorithmic trading platform we acquired in September 2021. Despite our best efforts, there can be no assurance that we will be able to achieve these objectives on a timely basis, if at all, as the development of an early-stage securities brokerage business involves inherent regulatory and operational risks and uncertainties, including the uncertain ability of us to integrate the Opencash investment platform application with the proprietary algorithmic trading platform we acquired in September 2021, particularly as the platform we acquired in 2021 has not been placed in commercial service since 2021; thus, any such integration could be subject to IT-related and commercial risks. More information on potential factors that could affect Investview’s financial results is included from time to time in Investview’s public reports filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Company’s most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, and Current Reports on Form 8-K. The forward-looking statements made in this release speak only as of the date of this release, and Investview, Inc. assumes no obligation to update any such forward-looking statements to reflect actual results or changes in expectations, except as otherwise required by law.

    Investor Relations
    Contact: Ralph R. Valvano
    Phone Number: 732.889.4300
    Email: pr@investview.com

    Reconciliation of Gross Revenue to Net Revenue
    (unaudited)

    As used in this report, Gross Revenues are not a measure of financial performance under United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”). Gross Revenues are presented as they are used by management to understand the total revenue before certain items such as refunds, incentives, credits, chargebacks, and amounts paid to third party providers. The non-GAAP Gross Revenue measure is a supplement to the GAAP financial information. A reconciliation between Gross Revenue (non-GAAP) and Net Revenue is presented in the table below.

    Gross Revenue (non-GAAP) to Net Revenue reconciliation for the three months ended March 31, 2025 is as follows:

        Membership
    revenue
        Mining revenue     Health and wellness product sales     Other Revenue     Total  
    Gross billings/receipts   $ 9,439,857     $ 862,944     $ 368,443     $ 7,344     $ 10,678,588  
    Refunds, incentives, credits, and chargebacks     (648,414 )     –       (122 )     –       (648,536 )
    Net revenue   $ 8,791,443     $ 862,944     $ 368,321     $ 7,344     $ 10,030,052  

    Gross Revenue (non-GAAP) to Net Revenue reconciliation for the three months ended March 31, 2024 is as follows:

        Membership
    Revenue
        Mining Revenue     Total  
    Gross billings/receipts   $ 13,851,294     $ 2,642,599     $ 16,493,893  
    Refunds, incentives, credits, and chargebacks     (821,976 )     –       (821,976 )
    Net revenue   $ 13,029,318     $ 2,642,599     $ 15,671,917  

    The MIL Network –

    May 15, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: NASA’s Magellan Mission Reveals Possible Tectonic Activity on Venus

    Source: NASA

    Using archival data from the mission, launched in 1989, researchers have uncovered new evidence that tectonic activity may be deforming the planet’s surface.
    Vast, quasi-circular features on Venus’ surface may reveal that the planet has ongoing tectonics, according to new research based on data gathered more than 30 years ago by NASA’s Magellan mission. On Earth, the planet’s surface is continually renewed by the constant shifting and recycling of massive sections of crust, called tectonic plates, that float atop a viscous interior. Venus doesn’t have tectonic plates, but its surface is still being deformed by molten material from below.
    Seeking to better understand the underlying processes driving these deformations, the researchers studied a type of feature called a corona. Ranging in size from dozens to hundreds of miles across, a corona is most often thought to be the location where a plume of hot, buoyant material from the planet’s mantle rises, pushing against the lithosphere above. (The lithosphere includes the planet’s crust and the uppermost part of its mantle.) These structures are usually oval, with a concentric fracture system surrounding them. Hundreds of coronae are known to exist on Venus.
    Published in the journal Science Advances, the new study details newly discovered signs of activity at or beneath the surface shaping many of Venus’ coronae, features that may also provide a unique window into Earth’s past. The researchers found the evidence of this tectonic activity within data from NASA’s Magellan mission, which orbited Venus in the 1990s and gathered the most detailed gravity and topography data on the planet currently available.
    “Coronae are not found on Earth today; however, they may have existed when our planet was young and before plate tectonics had been established,” said the study’s lead author, Gael Cascioli, assistant research scientist at the University of Maryland, Baltimore County, and NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland. “By combining gravity and topography data, this research has provided a new and important insight into the possible subsurface processes currently shaping the surface of Venus.”

    As members of NASA’s forthcoming VERITAS (Venus Emissivity, Radio science, InSAR, Topography, and Spectroscopy) mission, Cascioli and his team are particularly interested in the high-resolution gravity data the spacecraft will provide. Study coauthor Erwan Mazarico, also at Goddard, will co-lead the VERITAS gravity experiment when the mission launches no earlier than 2031.
    Mystery Coronae
    Managed by NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Southern California, Magellan used its radar system to see through Venus’ thick atmosphere and map the topography of its mountains and plains. Of the geological features the spacecraft mapped, coronae were perhaps the most enigmatic: It wasn’t clear how they formed. In the years since, scientists have found many coronae in locations where the planet’s lithosphere is thin and heat flow is high.
    “Coronae are abundant on Venus. They are very large features, and people have proposed different theories over the years as to how they formed,” said coauthor Anna Gülcher, Earth and planetary scientist at the University of Bern in Switzerland. “The most exciting thing for our study is that we can now say there are most likely various and ongoing active processes driving their formation. We believe these same processes may have occurred early in Earth’s history.”
    The researchers developed sophisticated 3D geodynamic models that demonstrate various formation scenarios for plume-induced coronae and compared them with the combined gravity and topography data from Magellan. The gravity data proved crucial in helping the researchers detect less dense, hot, and buoyant plumes under the surface — information that couldn’t be discerned from topography data alone. Of the 75 coronae studied, 52 appear to have buoyant mantle material beneath them that is likely driving tectonic processes.
    One key process is subduction: On Earth, it happens when the edge of one tectonic plate is driven beneath the adjacent plate. Friction between the plates can generate earthquakes, and as the old rocky material dives into the hot mantle, the rock melts and is recycled back to the surface via volcanic vents.

    On Venus, a different kind of subduction is thought to occur around the perimeter of some coronae. In this scenario, as a buoyant plume of hot rock in the mantle pushes upward into the lithosphere, surface material rises and spreads outward, colliding with surrounding surface material and pushing that material downward into the mantle.
    Another tectonic process known as lithospheric dripping could also be present, where dense accumulations of comparatively cool material sink from the lithosphere into the hot mantle. The researchers also identify several places where a third process may be taking place: A plume of molten rock beneath a thicker part of the lithosphere potentially drives volcanism above it.
    Deciphering Venus
    This work marks the latest instance of scientists returning to Magellan data to find that Venus exhibits geologic processes that are more Earth-like than originally thought. Recently, researchers were able to spot erupting volcanoes, including vast lava flows that vented from Maat Mons, Sif Mons, and Eistla Regio in radar images from the orbiter.
    While those images provided direct evidence of volcanic action, the authors of the new study will need sharper resolution to draw a complete picture about the tectonic processes driving corona formation. “The VERITAS gravity maps of Venus will boost the resolution by at least a factor of two to four, depending on location — a level of detail that could revolutionize our understanding of Venus’ geology and implications for early Earth,” said study coauthor Suzanne Smrekar, a planetary scientist at JPL and principal investigator for VERITAS.
    Managed by JPL, VERITAS will use a synthetic aperture radar to create 3D global maps and a near-infrared spectrometer to figure out what the surface of Venus is made of.  Using its radio tracking system, the spacecraft will also measure the planet’s gravitational field to determine the structure of Venus’ interior. All of these instruments will help pinpoint areas of activity on the surface.
    For more information about NASA’s VERITAS mission, visit:

    VERITAS

    News Media Contacts
    Ian J. O’NeillJet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif.818-354-2649ian.j.oneill@jpl.nasa.gov
    Karen Fox / Molly WasserNASA Headquarters, Washington202-358-1600karen.c.fox@nasa.gov / molly.l.wasser@nasa.gov
    2025-068

    MIL OSI USA News –

    May 15, 2025
←Previous Page
1 … 366 367 368 369 370 … 1,010
Next Page→
NewzIntel.com

NewzIntel.com

MIL Open Source Intelligence

  • Blog
  • About
  • FAQs
  • Authors
  • Events
  • Shop
  • Patterns
  • Themes

Twenty Twenty-Five

Designed with WordPress