NewzIntel.com

Category: Emissions Trading

  • MIL-OSI: Diginex Limited Announces 57% Increase in Revenues and Transformed Balance Sheet for Fiscal Year ended March 31, 2025

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    LONDON, July 11, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Diginex Limited (“Diginex” or the “Company”) (NASDAQ: DGNX), a leading provider of Sustainability RegTech solutions, today announced its financial results for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2025.

    Fiscal Year ended March 31, 2025 Full-Year Highlights:

    • Revenues for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2025, increased 57% to $2.0 million driven primarily by an increase in software subscriptions and license fees.
    • Net loss for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2025, of $5.2 million, an increase of $0.3 million compared to the net loss of $4.9 million recorded in the prior year.
    • Transformed balance sheet with net assets of $4.6 million at March 31, 2025, compared to net liabilities of $23.0 million at March 31, 2024.
    • Completed Initial Public Offering (“IPO”) in January 2025.

    Post Year End Strategic Highlights

    • Signed a memorandum of understanding on June 5, 2025 to acquire Resulticks Group Companies Pte Limited (“Resulticks”), subject to definitive agreements, in a transaction valued at approximately US$2 billion, to be primarily settled in Diginex ordinary shares. This combination leverages Resulticks’ real-time audience engagement, agentic AI framework, and global reach to drive sustainability, compliance, customer relationships, and collective growth.
    • Executed a memorandum of understanding on May 23, 2025, to acquire Matter DK ApS (“Matter”), subject to definitive agreements, for approximately US$13 million in an all-share deal. Management believes the acquisition of Matter will strengthen the Company’s sustainability data coverage, ESG analytics offerings, as well as its automated data collection capabilities.

    Management Commentary

    “The year ended March 31, 2025 was a transformative period for the Company, marked by the successful completion of our IPO in January 2025, a 57% increase in revenues and strategic agreements signed during the fiscal year to boost future revenues and client acquisition with leading professional firms such as Russell Bedford International and Baker Tilly Singapore. During the year, we also enhanced our product offerings with the introduction of AI-powered compliance solutions, delivering features such as multi-variant drafting, automated risk reduction, future-proofing for evolving regulations, and improved scalability for users of our Sustainability SaaS reporting platform, diginexESG,” said Mark Blick, Chief Executive Officer of Diginex Limited. “We achieved overall revenue growth, driven in part, by a significant licensing agreement and ongoing demand for our core ESG reporting and supply chain risk management products. At the same time, we deliberately shifted resources to accelerate the development of diginexESG and diginexLUMEN, which positions us well for long-term growth and recurring revenues at the expense of revenues from one-off mandates via customization projects.”

    “We also maintained a disciplined approach to cost management. While general and administrative expenses increased year on year, this was primarily due to IPO related professional fees and the fair value adjustment related to the issuance of preferred shares under an anti-dilution clause following an $8 million capital raise in May 2024. We did, however, achieve cost reductions in employee benefits, IT development and maintenance costs, while continuing to deliver on our product road map, and other discretionary spending. These actions demonstrate our commitment to building a sustainable business model and cost structure that supports future profitability while continuing to fund strategic priorities.”

    “We’re also excited to have signed a memorandum of understanding on March 17, 2025, to pursue a dual listing of our ordinary shares on the Abu Dhabi Securities Exchange,” said Mr. Blick. “This planned listing is intended to increase exposure of Diginex to regional and international investors, strengthen our relationships in the Gulf Cooperation Council (“GCC”) region, and support Abu Dhabi’s strategic focus on sustainable finance. We believe this step aligns with our long-term commitment to expand our global presence.” The memorandum of understanding also contemplates a planned capital raise of up to USD$250 million focused on large institutional investors based in the GCC and a strategic alliance to support business growth in Abu Dhabi and the surrounding GCC region.”

    “Importantly, we are advancing our strategy to strengthen and diversify our technology and data capabilities through targeted acquisitions,” continued Mr. Blick. “Following the close of the fiscal year ended March 31, 2025, we signed two memoranda of understanding to acquire Resulticks and Matter, subject to definitive agreements. These transactions, if completed, would meaningfully expand our AI-driven data management and sustainability analytics capabilities globally, supporting our vision of delivering integrated, high-value solutions to clients worldwide. While both agreements remain subject to due diligence, negotiation and finalizing definitive terms, they demonstrate our commitment to disciplined, strategic growth through carefully selected acquisitions. We see powerful synergies with Resulticks in targeted sustainability marketing at scale, bringing in Matter’s sustainability data for company benchmarking and supply chain due diligence through diginexLUMEN, and the provision of AI enabled sustainability reporting capabilities with diginexESG.”

    “Looking ahead, we have reason for optimism as our Company is on the leading edge of fundamental changes in the data industry that will drive future growth. We remain committed to investing across the Diginex platforms, enhancing our global market presence both organically and through acquisitions, and managing our operations with discipline to deliver long-term value to our shareholders,” Mr. Blick stated.

    Revenues

      For the year ended
    March 31,
    in USD millions 2025 2024
         
    Subscription and license fees 1.3 0.4
    Advisory fees 0.3 0.2
    Customization fees 0.4 0.7
    Total  2.0  1.3
         

    For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2025, total revenue increased by $0.7 million to $2.0 million, compared to $1.3 million in the prior year. The increase was primarily attributable to a $0.9 million license fee from the granting of a non-exclusive right to distribute a white-label version of diginexESG. Excluding this transaction, revenue from software subscriptions and licenses remained stable at $0.4 million for the year. Subscription and license fees are generated from sales of diginexESG and diginexLUMEN.

    Revenue from advisory fees increased modestly to $0.3 million, reflecting an improvement of $0.1 million compared to the prior year. Advisory services includes projects such as developing ESG strategies, conducting ESG materiality assessments or conducting training sessions on a range of ESG topics.

    The increase in total revenue was partially offset by a decline in revenue from customization projects, which decreased by $0.3 million to $0.4 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2025. This reduction was an expected outcome of the Company’s strategic decision to allocate more resources to the development and expansion of diginexESG and diginexLUMEN, leading to a temporary reduction in the acceptance of customization projects.

    “We are focused on building long-term, sustainable growth across all of our service lines,” said Mr. Blick. “This year’s results highlight the strength of our core subscription business and our ability to unlock additional revenue opportunities through strategic agreements and licensing agreements.”

    General and Administrative Expenses

      For the year ended
    March 31,
    in USD millions 2025 2024
         
    Employee benefits  4.8  5.0
    IT development and maintenance support 1.5 2.1
    Audit fees 0.4 0.6
    Professional fees 2.1 0.5
    Travel and entertainment 0.4 0.5
    Share based payments 0.4 –
    Amortization and depreciation 0.1 0.1
    Other 0.6 0.5
      10.3 9.3
         

    For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2025, general and administrative expenses increased by $1.0 million to $10.3 million, compared to $9.3 million in the prior fiscal year. This increase was primarily driven by higher professional fees associated with the Company’s IPO and a share-based payment expense related to preferred shares issued under an anti-dilution clause triggered by a capital raise completed in May 2024. These higher costs were partially offset by reductions in employee benefits, IT development and maintenance support, while continuing to deliver on our product roadmap, and audit fees.

    Employee benefits decreased by $0.2 million which was the result of reduced costs associated with the fair value of employee share options granted to employees of $0.5 million and a partially offsetting increase in salaries of $0.3 million. Headcount at March 31, 2025 was 32 and included 23 employees and 9 contractors compared to a headcount of 29 at March 31, 2024, which included 22 employees and 7 contractors.

    Balance Sheet Highlights

    At March 31, 2025, net assets of $4.6 million represented a transformation and significant improvement from net liabilities of $23.0 million at March 31, 2024. The improvement was driven by the capitalization of shareholder loans and advances, convertible loan notes and redeemable preferred shares. The capitalization events were triggered by the IPO.  

    The Company’s cash position of $3.1 million at March 31, 2025, is also higher than the $0.1 million of cash reported at March 31, 2024.

    The balance sheet at March 31, 2025, held no interest-bearing debt instruments.

    “The strengthening of our balance sheet following our IPO marks an important milestone for the company,” concluded Mr. Blick. “This enhanced financial position gives us the flexibility to invest in growth, pursue strategic initiatives, and deliver sustainable value to our shareholders. We remain committed to disciplined capital management as we expand our operations, strengthen key partnerships, and execute on our long-term vision to drive innovation and create a lasting impact in our industry.”

    About Diginex
    Diginex Limited (Nasdaq: DGNX; ISIN KYG286871044), headquartered in London, is a sustainable RegTech business that empowers businesses and governments to streamline ESG, climate, and supply chain data collection and reporting. The Company utilizes blockchain, AI, machine learning and data analysis technology to lead change and increase transparency in corporate regulatory reporting and sustainable finance. Diginex’s products and services solutions enable companies to collect, evaluate and share sustainability data through easy-to-use software. 

    The award-winning diginexESG platform supports 19 global frameworks, including GRI (the “Global Reporting Initiative”), SASB (the “Sustainability Accounting Standards Board”), and ISSB (IFRS Sustainability Disclosure Standards). Clients benefit from end-to-end support, ranging from materiality assessments and data management to stakeholder engagement, report generation and an ESG Ratings Support Service.

    For more information, please visit the Company’s website: https://www.diginex.com/.

    Forward-Looking Statements

    Certain statements in this announcement are forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties and are based on the Company’s current expectations and projections about future events that the Company believes may affect its financial condition, results of operations, business strategy and financial needs. Investors can identify these forward-looking statements by words or phrases such as “approximates,” “believes,” “hopes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “projects,” “intends,” “plans,” “will,” “would,” “should,” “could,” “may” or other similar expressions. The Company undertakes no obligation to update or revise publicly any forward-looking statements to reflect subsequent occurring events or circumstances, or changes in its expectations, except as may be required by law. Although the Company believes that the expectations expressed in these forward-looking statements are reasonable, it cannot assure you that such expectations will turn out to be correct, and the Company cautions investors that actual results may differ materially from the anticipated results and encourages investors to review other factors that may affect its future results disclosed in the Company’s filings with the SEC.

    Diginex
    Investor Relations
    Email: ir@diginex.com

    IR Contact – Europe
    Anna Höffken
    Phone: +49.40.609186.0
    Email: diginex@kirchhoff.de

    IR Contact – US
    Jackson Lin
    Lambert by LLYC
    Phone: +1 (646) 717-4593
    Email: jian.lin@llyc.global

    IR Contact – Asia
    Shelly Cheng
    Strategic Financial Relations Ltd.
    Phone: +852 2864 4857
    Email: sprg_diginex@sprg.com.hk

         
    DIGINEX LIMITED
    CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF PROFIT OR LOSS AND OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
    For the years ended 31 March 2024 and 2025
         
      Year ended Year ended
      31 March 2025 31 March 2024
      USD USD
    Revenue 2,040,602 1,299,538
    General and administrative expenses (10,344,514) (9,363,345)
    OPERATING LOSS (8,303,912) (8,063,807)
    Other income, gains or (losses) 3,501,200 3,753,988
    Finance cost, net (410,167) (552,651)
    LOSS BEFORE TAX (5,212,879) (4,862,470)
    Income tax expense – (8,917)
    LOSS FOR THE YEAR (5,212,879) (4,871,387)
    OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)    
    Items that may be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss:    
    Exchange gain (loss) on translation of foreign operations 30 (7,684)
    TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE LOSS FOR THE YEAR (5,212,849) (4,879,071)
         
    LOSS PER SHARE ATTRIBUTABLE TO
    THE ORDINARY EQUITY HOLDERS OF THE COMPANY    		    
    Basic loss per share (0.33) (0.51)
         
    Diluted loss per share (0.53) (0.75)
         
    DIGINEX LIMITED
    CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL POSITION
    At 31 March 2024 and 2025
         
      At
    31 March 2025    		 At
    31 March 2024
      USD USD
    ASSETS    
    Right-of-use assets 225,672 357,202
    Rental deposit 45,463 35,431
    Plant and equipment – –
    Total non-current assets 271,135 392,633
    Trade receivables, net 1,394,545 182,334
    Contract assets 750 69,354
    Other receivables, deposit and prepayment 1,066,191 253,476
    Restricted bank balance 399,400 –
    Cash and cash equivalents 3,111,141 76,620
    Total current assets 5,972,027 581,784
    LIABILITIES    
    Trade payables (200,660) (788,798)
    Other payables and accruals (706,874) (596,870)
    Tax payables – (8,917)
    Deferred revenues (505,424) (322,826)
    Due to a related company (34,579) (34,579)
    Due to immediate holding company – (5,345,929)
    Loans from immediate holding company – (1,930,993)
    Loan from a related company – (1,140,931)
    Lease liabilities, current (126,808) (122,076)
    Convertible loan notes, current – (3,975,534)
    Total current liabilities (1,574,345) (14,267,453)
    Lease liabilities, net of current portion (110,867) (243,280)
    Preferred shares – (9,359,000)
    Convertible loan notes, net of current portion – (114,808)
    Total non-current liabilities (110,867) (9,717,088)
    Net current assets (liabilities) 4,397,682 (13,685,669)
    Net assets (liabilities) 4,557,950 (23,010,124)
    EQUITY (DEFICIT)    
    Share Capital 1,150 477
    Share Premium 25,689,436 –
    Capital reserve 5,126,150 3,752,192
    Warrant reserve 79,263,200 –
    Exchange reserve (1,651) (1,681)
    Share option reserve 1,076,345 2,409,689
    Accumulated losses (106,596,680) (29,170,801)
    Total equity (deficit) 4,557,950 (23,010,124)
         
    DIGINEX LIMITED
    CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
    For the years ended 31 March 2024 and 2025
         
      Year ended Year ended
      31 March 2025 31 March 2024
      USD USD
    CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES    
    Loss before taxation (5,212,879) (4,862,470)
    Adjustments for:    
    Amortization – right-of-use assets 125,575 99,580
    Depreciation – property, plant and equipment – 3,696
    Impairment losses (reversed) recognized in respect of trade receivables (2,844) (400)
    Bad debt written off 12,064 21,522
    Write-off of due from related company – 81,347
    Finance costs 410,167 552,651
    Share option awards 859,685 1,352,835
    Share-based payments expenses on anti-dilution issuance of preferred shares 369,648 –
    IPO expenses charged to P&L 1,659,081 –
    Net fair value loss of convertible loan notes 639,000 374,000
    Net fair value loss of preferred shares (4,117,648) (4,101,000)
    Operating cash flows before movements in working capital (5,258,151) (6,478,239)
    Movements in working capital    
    Trade receivables (1,221,431) 86,332
    Other receivables, deposit and prepayment (955,348) (210,936)
    Contract assets 68,604 (42,365)
    Due from a related company – (39,815
    Trade and other payables (478,610) 841,155
    Deferred revenue 182,598 (12,840)
    Amount due to immediate holding company – –
    Cash generated from operations (7,662,338) (5,856,708)
    Income tax paid (8,917) –
    Net cash used in operating activities (7,671,255) (5,856,708)
    CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES    
    Payment to rental deposit (10,032) –
    Cash used in investing activities (10,032) –
    CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES    
    Issue of shares under global offerings 10,608,750 –
    Payment of transaction costs of issue of new shares (2,948,791) –
    Loans from immediate holding company 3,410,461 564,483
    Advances from immediate holding company 713,719 5,345,423
    Proceeds from shares issued 50 –
    Proceeds from issuance of convertible loan notes – 100,000
    Loan from a related company – –
    Repayment of due to immediate holding company – –
    Repayment of lease liabilities (138,962) (109,754)
    Placement of restricted bank balance (399,400) –
    Repayment of loan from immediate holding company (530,019) (1,150,000)
    Net cash generated from financing activities 10,715,808 4,750,152
    NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS 3,034,521 (1,106,556)
    Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year 76,620 1,183,176
    CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT THE END OF THE YEAR 3,111,141 76,620
         

    The MIL Network –

  • MIL-OSI: Diginex Limited Announces 57% Increase in Revenues and Transformed Balance Sheet for Fiscal Year ended March 31, 2025

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    LONDON, July 11, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Diginex Limited (“Diginex” or the “Company”) (NASDAQ: DGNX), a leading provider of Sustainability RegTech solutions, today announced its financial results for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2025.

    Fiscal Year ended March 31, 2025 Full-Year Highlights:

    • Revenues for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2025, increased 57% to $2.0 million driven primarily by an increase in software subscriptions and license fees.
    • Net loss for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2025, of $5.2 million, an increase of $0.3 million compared to the net loss of $4.9 million recorded in the prior year.
    • Transformed balance sheet with net assets of $4.6 million at March 31, 2025, compared to net liabilities of $23.0 million at March 31, 2024.
    • Completed Initial Public Offering (“IPO”) in January 2025.

    Post Year End Strategic Highlights

    • Signed a memorandum of understanding on June 5, 2025 to acquire Resulticks Group Companies Pte Limited (“Resulticks”), subject to definitive agreements, in a transaction valued at approximately US$2 billion, to be primarily settled in Diginex ordinary shares. This combination leverages Resulticks’ real-time audience engagement, agentic AI framework, and global reach to drive sustainability, compliance, customer relationships, and collective growth.
    • Executed a memorandum of understanding on May 23, 2025, to acquire Matter DK ApS (“Matter”), subject to definitive agreements, for approximately US$13 million in an all-share deal. Management believes the acquisition of Matter will strengthen the Company’s sustainability data coverage, ESG analytics offerings, as well as its automated data collection capabilities.

    Management Commentary

    “The year ended March 31, 2025 was a transformative period for the Company, marked by the successful completion of our IPO in January 2025, a 57% increase in revenues and strategic agreements signed during the fiscal year to boost future revenues and client acquisition with leading professional firms such as Russell Bedford International and Baker Tilly Singapore. During the year, we also enhanced our product offerings with the introduction of AI-powered compliance solutions, delivering features such as multi-variant drafting, automated risk reduction, future-proofing for evolving regulations, and improved scalability for users of our Sustainability SaaS reporting platform, diginexESG,” said Mark Blick, Chief Executive Officer of Diginex Limited. “We achieved overall revenue growth, driven in part, by a significant licensing agreement and ongoing demand for our core ESG reporting and supply chain risk management products. At the same time, we deliberately shifted resources to accelerate the development of diginexESG and diginexLUMEN, which positions us well for long-term growth and recurring revenues at the expense of revenues from one-off mandates via customization projects.”

    “We also maintained a disciplined approach to cost management. While general and administrative expenses increased year on year, this was primarily due to IPO related professional fees and the fair value adjustment related to the issuance of preferred shares under an anti-dilution clause following an $8 million capital raise in May 2024. We did, however, achieve cost reductions in employee benefits, IT development and maintenance costs, while continuing to deliver on our product road map, and other discretionary spending. These actions demonstrate our commitment to building a sustainable business model and cost structure that supports future profitability while continuing to fund strategic priorities.”

    “We’re also excited to have signed a memorandum of understanding on March 17, 2025, to pursue a dual listing of our ordinary shares on the Abu Dhabi Securities Exchange,” said Mr. Blick. “This planned listing is intended to increase exposure of Diginex to regional and international investors, strengthen our relationships in the Gulf Cooperation Council (“GCC”) region, and support Abu Dhabi’s strategic focus on sustainable finance. We believe this step aligns with our long-term commitment to expand our global presence.” The memorandum of understanding also contemplates a planned capital raise of up to USD$250 million focused on large institutional investors based in the GCC and a strategic alliance to support business growth in Abu Dhabi and the surrounding GCC region.”

    “Importantly, we are advancing our strategy to strengthen and diversify our technology and data capabilities through targeted acquisitions,” continued Mr. Blick. “Following the close of the fiscal year ended March 31, 2025, we signed two memoranda of understanding to acquire Resulticks and Matter, subject to definitive agreements. These transactions, if completed, would meaningfully expand our AI-driven data management and sustainability analytics capabilities globally, supporting our vision of delivering integrated, high-value solutions to clients worldwide. While both agreements remain subject to due diligence, negotiation and finalizing definitive terms, they demonstrate our commitment to disciplined, strategic growth through carefully selected acquisitions. We see powerful synergies with Resulticks in targeted sustainability marketing at scale, bringing in Matter’s sustainability data for company benchmarking and supply chain due diligence through diginexLUMEN, and the provision of AI enabled sustainability reporting capabilities with diginexESG.”

    “Looking ahead, we have reason for optimism as our Company is on the leading edge of fundamental changes in the data industry that will drive future growth. We remain committed to investing across the Diginex platforms, enhancing our global market presence both organically and through acquisitions, and managing our operations with discipline to deliver long-term value to our shareholders,” Mr. Blick stated.

    Revenues

      For the year ended
    March 31,
    in USD millions 2025 2024
         
    Subscription and license fees 1.3 0.4
    Advisory fees 0.3 0.2
    Customization fees 0.4 0.7
    Total  2.0  1.3
         

    For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2025, total revenue increased by $0.7 million to $2.0 million, compared to $1.3 million in the prior year. The increase was primarily attributable to a $0.9 million license fee from the granting of a non-exclusive right to distribute a white-label version of diginexESG. Excluding this transaction, revenue from software subscriptions and licenses remained stable at $0.4 million for the year. Subscription and license fees are generated from sales of diginexESG and diginexLUMEN.

    Revenue from advisory fees increased modestly to $0.3 million, reflecting an improvement of $0.1 million compared to the prior year. Advisory services includes projects such as developing ESG strategies, conducting ESG materiality assessments or conducting training sessions on a range of ESG topics.

    The increase in total revenue was partially offset by a decline in revenue from customization projects, which decreased by $0.3 million to $0.4 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2025. This reduction was an expected outcome of the Company’s strategic decision to allocate more resources to the development and expansion of diginexESG and diginexLUMEN, leading to a temporary reduction in the acceptance of customization projects.

    “We are focused on building long-term, sustainable growth across all of our service lines,” said Mr. Blick. “This year’s results highlight the strength of our core subscription business and our ability to unlock additional revenue opportunities through strategic agreements and licensing agreements.”

    General and Administrative Expenses

      For the year ended
    March 31,
    in USD millions 2025 2024
         
    Employee benefits  4.8  5.0
    IT development and maintenance support 1.5 2.1
    Audit fees 0.4 0.6
    Professional fees 2.1 0.5
    Travel and entertainment 0.4 0.5
    Share based payments 0.4 –
    Amortization and depreciation 0.1 0.1
    Other 0.6 0.5
      10.3 9.3
         

    For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2025, general and administrative expenses increased by $1.0 million to $10.3 million, compared to $9.3 million in the prior fiscal year. This increase was primarily driven by higher professional fees associated with the Company’s IPO and a share-based payment expense related to preferred shares issued under an anti-dilution clause triggered by a capital raise completed in May 2024. These higher costs were partially offset by reductions in employee benefits, IT development and maintenance support, while continuing to deliver on our product roadmap, and audit fees.

    Employee benefits decreased by $0.2 million which was the result of reduced costs associated with the fair value of employee share options granted to employees of $0.5 million and a partially offsetting increase in salaries of $0.3 million. Headcount at March 31, 2025 was 32 and included 23 employees and 9 contractors compared to a headcount of 29 at March 31, 2024, which included 22 employees and 7 contractors.

    Balance Sheet Highlights

    At March 31, 2025, net assets of $4.6 million represented a transformation and significant improvement from net liabilities of $23.0 million at March 31, 2024. The improvement was driven by the capitalization of shareholder loans and advances, convertible loan notes and redeemable preferred shares. The capitalization events were triggered by the IPO.  

    The Company’s cash position of $3.1 million at March 31, 2025, is also higher than the $0.1 million of cash reported at March 31, 2024.

    The balance sheet at March 31, 2025, held no interest-bearing debt instruments.

    “The strengthening of our balance sheet following our IPO marks an important milestone for the company,” concluded Mr. Blick. “This enhanced financial position gives us the flexibility to invest in growth, pursue strategic initiatives, and deliver sustainable value to our shareholders. We remain committed to disciplined capital management as we expand our operations, strengthen key partnerships, and execute on our long-term vision to drive innovation and create a lasting impact in our industry.”

    About Diginex
    Diginex Limited (Nasdaq: DGNX; ISIN KYG286871044), headquartered in London, is a sustainable RegTech business that empowers businesses and governments to streamline ESG, climate, and supply chain data collection and reporting. The Company utilizes blockchain, AI, machine learning and data analysis technology to lead change and increase transparency in corporate regulatory reporting and sustainable finance. Diginex’s products and services solutions enable companies to collect, evaluate and share sustainability data through easy-to-use software. 

    The award-winning diginexESG platform supports 19 global frameworks, including GRI (the “Global Reporting Initiative”), SASB (the “Sustainability Accounting Standards Board”), and ISSB (IFRS Sustainability Disclosure Standards). Clients benefit from end-to-end support, ranging from materiality assessments and data management to stakeholder engagement, report generation and an ESG Ratings Support Service.

    For more information, please visit the Company’s website: https://www.diginex.com/.

    Forward-Looking Statements

    Certain statements in this announcement are forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties and are based on the Company’s current expectations and projections about future events that the Company believes may affect its financial condition, results of operations, business strategy and financial needs. Investors can identify these forward-looking statements by words or phrases such as “approximates,” “believes,” “hopes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “projects,” “intends,” “plans,” “will,” “would,” “should,” “could,” “may” or other similar expressions. The Company undertakes no obligation to update or revise publicly any forward-looking statements to reflect subsequent occurring events or circumstances, or changes in its expectations, except as may be required by law. Although the Company believes that the expectations expressed in these forward-looking statements are reasonable, it cannot assure you that such expectations will turn out to be correct, and the Company cautions investors that actual results may differ materially from the anticipated results and encourages investors to review other factors that may affect its future results disclosed in the Company’s filings with the SEC.

    Diginex
    Investor Relations
    Email: ir@diginex.com

    IR Contact – Europe
    Anna Höffken
    Phone: +49.40.609186.0
    Email: diginex@kirchhoff.de

    IR Contact – US
    Jackson Lin
    Lambert by LLYC
    Phone: +1 (646) 717-4593
    Email: jian.lin@llyc.global

    IR Contact – Asia
    Shelly Cheng
    Strategic Financial Relations Ltd.
    Phone: +852 2864 4857
    Email: sprg_diginex@sprg.com.hk

         
    DIGINEX LIMITED
    CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF PROFIT OR LOSS AND OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
    For the years ended 31 March 2024 and 2025
         
      Year ended Year ended
      31 March 2025 31 March 2024
      USD USD
    Revenue 2,040,602 1,299,538
    General and administrative expenses (10,344,514) (9,363,345)
    OPERATING LOSS (8,303,912) (8,063,807)
    Other income, gains or (losses) 3,501,200 3,753,988
    Finance cost, net (410,167) (552,651)
    LOSS BEFORE TAX (5,212,879) (4,862,470)
    Income tax expense – (8,917)
    LOSS FOR THE YEAR (5,212,879) (4,871,387)
    OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)    
    Items that may be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss:    
    Exchange gain (loss) on translation of foreign operations 30 (7,684)
    TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE LOSS FOR THE YEAR (5,212,849) (4,879,071)
         
    LOSS PER SHARE ATTRIBUTABLE TO
    THE ORDINARY EQUITY HOLDERS OF THE COMPANY    		    
    Basic loss per share (0.33) (0.51)
         
    Diluted loss per share (0.53) (0.75)
         
    DIGINEX LIMITED
    CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL POSITION
    At 31 March 2024 and 2025
         
      At
    31 March 2025    		 At
    31 March 2024
      USD USD
    ASSETS    
    Right-of-use assets 225,672 357,202
    Rental deposit 45,463 35,431
    Plant and equipment – –
    Total non-current assets 271,135 392,633
    Trade receivables, net 1,394,545 182,334
    Contract assets 750 69,354
    Other receivables, deposit and prepayment 1,066,191 253,476
    Restricted bank balance 399,400 –
    Cash and cash equivalents 3,111,141 76,620
    Total current assets 5,972,027 581,784
    LIABILITIES    
    Trade payables (200,660) (788,798)
    Other payables and accruals (706,874) (596,870)
    Tax payables – (8,917)
    Deferred revenues (505,424) (322,826)
    Due to a related company (34,579) (34,579)
    Due to immediate holding company – (5,345,929)
    Loans from immediate holding company – (1,930,993)
    Loan from a related company – (1,140,931)
    Lease liabilities, current (126,808) (122,076)
    Convertible loan notes, current – (3,975,534)
    Total current liabilities (1,574,345) (14,267,453)
    Lease liabilities, net of current portion (110,867) (243,280)
    Preferred shares – (9,359,000)
    Convertible loan notes, net of current portion – (114,808)
    Total non-current liabilities (110,867) (9,717,088)
    Net current assets (liabilities) 4,397,682 (13,685,669)
    Net assets (liabilities) 4,557,950 (23,010,124)
    EQUITY (DEFICIT)    
    Share Capital 1,150 477
    Share Premium 25,689,436 –
    Capital reserve 5,126,150 3,752,192
    Warrant reserve 79,263,200 –
    Exchange reserve (1,651) (1,681)
    Share option reserve 1,076,345 2,409,689
    Accumulated losses (106,596,680) (29,170,801)
    Total equity (deficit) 4,557,950 (23,010,124)
         
    DIGINEX LIMITED
    CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
    For the years ended 31 March 2024 and 2025
         
      Year ended Year ended
      31 March 2025 31 March 2024
      USD USD
    CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES    
    Loss before taxation (5,212,879) (4,862,470)
    Adjustments for:    
    Amortization – right-of-use assets 125,575 99,580
    Depreciation – property, plant and equipment – 3,696
    Impairment losses (reversed) recognized in respect of trade receivables (2,844) (400)
    Bad debt written off 12,064 21,522
    Write-off of due from related company – 81,347
    Finance costs 410,167 552,651
    Share option awards 859,685 1,352,835
    Share-based payments expenses on anti-dilution issuance of preferred shares 369,648 –
    IPO expenses charged to P&L 1,659,081 –
    Net fair value loss of convertible loan notes 639,000 374,000
    Net fair value loss of preferred shares (4,117,648) (4,101,000)
    Operating cash flows before movements in working capital (5,258,151) (6,478,239)
    Movements in working capital    
    Trade receivables (1,221,431) 86,332
    Other receivables, deposit and prepayment (955,348) (210,936)
    Contract assets 68,604 (42,365)
    Due from a related company – (39,815
    Trade and other payables (478,610) 841,155
    Deferred revenue 182,598 (12,840)
    Amount due to immediate holding company – –
    Cash generated from operations (7,662,338) (5,856,708)
    Income tax paid (8,917) –
    Net cash used in operating activities (7,671,255) (5,856,708)
    CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES    
    Payment to rental deposit (10,032) –
    Cash used in investing activities (10,032) –
    CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES    
    Issue of shares under global offerings 10,608,750 –
    Payment of transaction costs of issue of new shares (2,948,791) –
    Loans from immediate holding company 3,410,461 564,483
    Advances from immediate holding company 713,719 5,345,423
    Proceeds from shares issued 50 –
    Proceeds from issuance of convertible loan notes – 100,000
    Loan from a related company – –
    Repayment of due to immediate holding company – –
    Repayment of lease liabilities (138,962) (109,754)
    Placement of restricted bank balance (399,400) –
    Repayment of loan from immediate holding company (530,019) (1,150,000)
    Net cash generated from financing activities 10,715,808 4,750,152
    NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS 3,034,521 (1,106,556)
    Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year 76,620 1,183,176
    CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT THE END OF THE YEAR 3,111,141 76,620
         

    The MIL Network –

  • MIL-OSI: Solitron Devices, Inc. Announces Fiscal 2026 First Quarter Results

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    WEST PALM BEACH, Fla., July 11, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Solitron Devices, Inc. (OTC Pink: SODI) (“Solitron” or the “Company”) is pleased to announce fiscal 2026 first quarter results. 

    FISCAL 2026 FIRST QUARTER HIGHLIGHTS –

    • Net sales decreased 32% to approximately $2.70 million in the fiscal 2026 first quarter versus $3.97 million in the fiscal 2025 first quarter.
    • Net bookings increased 37% to $2.80 million in the fiscal 2026 first quarter versus $2.04 million in the prior year first quarter.
    • Backlog increased 94% to $18.26 million at the end of the fiscal 2026 first quarter as compared to $9.41 million at the end of the fiscal 2025 first quarter.
    • Net income (loss) was ($0.34) million, or ($0.16) per share, for the fiscal 2026 first quarter versus net income of $0.59 million, or $.28 per share, for the fiscal 2025 first quarter.

    Revenue continued to be down in the first quarter, similar to the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2025, due to the lag time between receipt of orders and production/fulfillment of those orders. As previously noted in our last press release, we expected lower revenues in this quarter and anticipate sales to pick up at the end of the fiscal second quarter, before reaching a steadier level in the fiscal third quarter.

    On a positive note, the Company’s backlog remains at record levels. Backlog increased from $18.11 million at the beginning of the fiscal year to $18.26 million at the end of fiscal 2026 first quarter.

    During the quarter we invested $1.65 million for 6.4% of the units in CBE LLC (“CBE”). CBE purchased a 25% interest in CrossingBridge Advisors (“CrossingBridge”), a subsidiary of ENDI Corp., for $25.9 million. CBE will be entitled to a royalty equal to approximately 14.9% of the revenue of CrossingBridge, which equated to an initial “cap” rate based on CrossingBridge’s revenue run rate as of December 31, 2024, of approximately 11.7%. Solitron’s royalty share will be just under 6.4% of CBE’s. CrossingBridge reported that its assets under management were $4.0 billion as of June 30, 2025, versus $3.4 billion as of December 31, 2024.

    By law, certain U.S. Department of Defense officials and other executive branch agency officials are required to submit reports to Congress describing defense and intelligence-related priorities that were not included in the President’s annual budget request. These reports, known as unfunded priorities lists (UPLs), identify certain programs, activities, or mission requirements for which appropriations were not requested, along with the funding amounts that may be necessary to resource them. In the recent unfunded priorities list it has been reported that the U.S. Air Force requested an increase in AMRAAM production from 1,200 annually to 2,400 annually by 2028. AMRAAM is the largest defense program that Solitron supplies to. While the request is positive news, any increase requires Congressional approval, and there are no assurances that approval will happen. We continue to see increased interest in new product development, including silicon carbide. We have developed various prototypes for testing by potential customers and continue to be optimistic about creating additional revenue sources.

    We continue to see increased interest in new product development, including silicon carbide. We have developed various prototypes for testing by potential customers and continue to be optimistic about creating additional revenue sources.

     
    SOLITRON DEVICES, INC.
    CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
    FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MAY 31, 2025, AND MAY 31, 2024
    (in thousands except for share and per share amounts)
     
        For The Three Months Ended   For The Three Months Ended
        May 31, 2025   May 31, 2024
        unaudited   unaudited
    Net sales   $ 2,700     $ 3,967  
    Cost of sales     2,310       2,292  
             
    Gross profit     390       1,675  
             
    Selling, general and administrative expenses     768       883  
             
    Operating income     (378 )     792  
             
    Other income (loss)        
    Interest income     –       5  
    Interest expense     (74 )     (50 )
    Dividend income     41       16  
    Realized gain (loss) on investments     81       11  
    Unrealized gain (loss) on investments     (127 )     27  
    Total other income (loss)     (79 )     9  
             
    Net income (loss) before income tax     (457 )     801  
    Income tax (expense) benefit     121       (212 )
             
    Net income (loss)   $ (336 )   $ 589  
             
    Net income (loss) per common share – basic and diluted   $ (0.16 )   $ 0.28  
             
    Weighted average shares outstanding – basic and diluted     2,082,553       2,083,436  
     
    SOLITRON DEVICES, INC. 
    CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS 
    AS OF MAY 31, 2025, AND FEBRUARY 28, 2025
    (in thousands, except for share and per share amounts)
     
        May 31,
    2025    		     February 28,
    2025    		  
                     
    ASSETS                
    CURRENT ASSETS                
    Cash and cash equivalents   $ 2,570     $ 4,099  
    Marketable securities     659       919  
    Accounts receivable     1,750       2,129  
    Inventories, net     3,591       3,440  
    Prepaid expenses and other current assets     212       132  
    TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS     8,782       10,719  
                     
    Property, plant and equipment, net     8,532       8,635  
    Intangible assets     2,852       2,905  
    Deferred tax asset     1,743       1,622  
    Long-term investment     1,650       –  
    Other assets     428       555  
    TOTAL ASSETS   $ 23,987     $ 24,436  
                     
    LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY                
    CURRENT LIABILITIES                
    Accounts payable   $ 732     $ 439  
    Customer deposits     119       118  
    Accrued contingent consideration, current     598       570  
    Mortgage loan, current portion     155       152  
    Accrued expenses and other current liabilities     857       846  
    TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES     2,461       2,125  
                     
    Accrued contingent consideration, non-current     254       663  
    Mortgage loan, net of current portion     3,725       3,765  
    TOTAL LIABILITIES     6,440       6,553  
                     
    STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY                
    Preferred stock, $.01 par value, authorized 500,000 shares, none issued     –       –  
    Common stock, $.01 par value, authorized 10,000,000 shares, 2,082,553 shares outstanding, net of 487,827 treasury shares at May 31, 2025 and 2,082,553 shares outstanding, net of 487,827 treasury shares at February 28, 2025, respectively     21       21  
    Additional paid-in capital     1,834       1,834  
    Retained earnings     17,104       17,440  
    Less treasury stock     (1,412 )     (1,412 )
    TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY     17,547       17,883  
    TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY   $ 23,987     $ 24,436  

    The unaudited financial information disclosed in this press release for the three months ended May 31, 2025, is based on management’s review of operations for that period and the information available to the Company as of the date of this press release. The Company’s results included herein have been prepared by, and are the responsibility of, the Company’s management. The Company’s independent auditors have audited the Company’s results for the fiscal year ending February 28, 2025. The financial results presented herein should not be considered a substitute for the information filed or to be filed with the SEC in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K and Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the respective periods once such reports become available.

    About Solitron Devices, Inc. 
    Solitron Devices, Inc., a Delaware corporation, designs, develops, manufactures, and markets solid state semiconductor components and related devices primarily for the military and aerospace markets. The Company manufactures a large variety of bipolar and metal oxide semiconductor (“MOS”) power transistors, power and control hybrids, junction and power MOS field effect transistors (“Power MOSFETS”), and other related products. Most of the Company’s products are custom made pursuant to contracts with customers whose end products are sold to the United States government. Other products, such as Joint Army/Navy (“JAN”) transistors, diodes, and Standard Military Drawings voltage regulators, are sold as standard or catalog items.

    Effective September 1, 2023, Solitron closed its acquisition of Micro Engineering Inc. (MEI) based in Apopka, Florida. MEI specializes in solving design layout and manufacturing challenges while maximizing efficiency and keeping flexibility to meet unique customer needs. Since 1980 the MEI team has been dedicated to overcoming obstacles to provide cost efficient and rapid results. MEI specializes in low to mid volume projects that require engineering dedication, quality systems and efficient manufacturing.

    Forward-Looking Statements 
    This press release contains forward-looking statements regarding future events and the future performance of Solitron Devices, Inc. that involve risks and uncertainties that could materially affect actual results, including statements regarding the Company’s expectations regarding future performance and trends, including production levels, government spending, backlog and delivery timelines, new product development, our efforts and performance following our acquisition of MEI, and potential future revenue and trends with respect thereto from each of the foregoing. Factors that could cause actual results to vary from current expectations and forward-looking statements contained in this press release include, but are not limited to, the risks and uncertainties arising from potential adverse developments or changes in government budgetary spending and policy including with respect to the war in Ukraine, which may among other factors be affected by the possibility of reduced government spending on programs in which we participate, inflation, elevated interest rates, adverse trends in the economy and the possibility of a recession the likelihood of which appears to have increased based on recent economic data, the possibility that management’s estimates and assumptions regarding bookings, sales and other metrics prove to be incorrect; the timing and size of orders from our clients, our delivery schedules and our liquidity and cash position; our ability to make the appropriate adjustments to our cost structure; our ability to properly account for inventory in the future; the demand for our products and potential loss of, or reduction of business from, substantial clients our dependence on government contracts, which are subject to termination, price renegotiations and regulatory compliance and which may among other factors be adversely affected by the factors described elsewhere herein, our ability to continue to integrate MEI in an efficient and effective manner, and the possibility that such acquisition or any other acquisition or strategic transaction we may pursue does not yield the results or benefits desired or anticipated. Descriptions of other risk factors and uncertainties are contained in the Company’s Securities and Exchange Commission filings, including its most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2025.

    Tim Eriksen 
    Chief Executive Officer 
    (561) 848-4311 
    Corporate@solitrondevices.com

    The MIL Network –

  • MIL-OSI: ETC Announces Fiscal 2026 First Quarter Results

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    SOUTHAMPTON, Pa., July 11, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Environmental Tectonics Corporation (OTC Pink: ETCC) (“ETC” or the “Company”) today reported its financial results for the thirteen week period ended May 30, 2025 (the “2026 first fiscal quarter”).

    Robert L. Laurent, Jr., ETC’s Chief Executive Officer and President stated, “We are pleased with the 39% increase in ETC operating income vs. prior year driven by an increase in sales of Aircrew Training Systems (“ATS”) and a decrease in operating expenses as compared to the prior year, as well as our 34% gross profit margin excluding the impact of lower margin sales related to construction of an aeromedical center during the 2026 first fiscal quarter. We exit the quarter with a sales backlog of $73 million and a large pipeline of opportunities.”

    Fiscal 2026 First Quarter Results of Operations

    Net Income

    Net income was $1.3 million, or $0.07 diluted earnings per share, in the 2026 first fiscal quarter, compared to net income of $1.4 million during the 2025 first fiscal quarter, or $0.08 diluted earnings per share. The $0.1 million decrease is primarily attributable to a $0.4 million, or 385.3% increase in interest expense, net and a $0.4 million, or 1850.0% increase in income tax provision in the 2026 first fiscal quarter as compared to 2025 first fiscal quarter partially offset by the net effect of a $0.9 million increase in ATS net sales, excluding the Aeromedical center building revenue, and a $0.7 million decrease in Commercial/Industrial Systems (“CIS”) net sales, and a $0.5 million decrease in operating expenses.

    Net Sales

    Net sales in the 2026 first fiscal quarter were $17.6 million, an increase of $4.1 million, or 30.5%, compared to 2025 first fiscal quarter net sales of $13.5 million. The increase in net sales was mainly a result of a $4.8 million, or 74.9% increase in ATS sales, $3.9 million of which relates to aeromedical center building revenue, slightly offset by a $0.8 million, or 14.2% decrease in Sterilizer Systems sales in the 2026 first fiscal quarter as compared to 2025 first fiscal quarter.

    Gross Profit

    Gross profit for the 2026 first fiscal quarter was $4.7 million (26.5% of net sales) compared to $4.5 million in 2025 first fiscal quarter (33.6% of net sales). The decrease in gross profit margin as a percentage of sales was a direct result of the increase in aeromedical center building revenue within the ATS business unit, which is lower margin than ETC’s core businesses as the work is being performed by a sub-contracted construction firm. Excluding the impact of the aeromedical center building revenue, gross profit margin was 34.3% for first fiscal quarter 2026 as compared to 33.9% for first fiscal quarter 2025.

    Operating Expenses

    Operating expenses, including sales and marketing, general and administrative, and research and development, for the 2026 first fiscal quarter were $2.5 million, a decrease of $0.5 million, or 16.0%, compared to $3.0 million for the 2025 first fiscal quarter. The decrease in operating expenses was due primarily to lower research and development expense at ETC-PZL in 2026 first fiscal quarter as compared to 2025 first fiscal quarter. In 2025 first fiscal quarter, ETC-PZL had limited sales which resulted in employees working on non-chargeable research and development projects.

    Operating Income

    Operating income for the 2026 fiscal first quarter was $2.2 million, an increase of $0.6 million, or 39.4%, compared to $1.6 million for the 2025 first fiscal quarter. The increase in operating income is attributable to the net effect of a $0.9 million increase in ATS net sales, excluding the Aeromedical center building revenue, and a $0.7 million decrease in Commercial/Industrial Systems (“CIS”) net sales, and a $0.5 million decrease in operating expenses.

    Interest Expense, Net

    Interest expense, net, for the 2026 first fiscal quarter was $0.6 million compared to $0.1 million in the 2025 first fiscal quarter, an increase of $0.4 million, or 385.3%, reflecting increased borrowing attributable to the leaseback of the demonstration equipment in 2025 fourth fiscal quarter.

    Income Tax Provision

    Income tax provision for the 2026 first fiscal quarter was $0.4 million compared to $0.0 million in the 2025 first fiscal quarter, an increase of $0.4 million, or 1850.0%. The increase is a non-cash tax expense attributable to the utilization of our Net Operating Loss (NOL) carryforward for which a deferred tax asset was established in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2025.

    Cash Flows from Operating, Investing, and Financing Activities

    During the 2026 first fiscal quarter, cash flows used in operating activities were $2.7 million, a decrease of $5.6 million compared to cash flows provided by operating activities of $2.9 million during 2025 first fiscal quarter. Cash flows during the 2026 first fiscal quarter primarily decreased as a result of an increase in accounts receivable, net, slightly offset by an increase in accounts payable, trade for 2026 first fiscal quarter as compared to 2025 first fiscal quarter.

    Cash used for investing activities primarily relates to funds used for capital expenditures of equipment and software development. The Company’s investing activities used $0.1 million during the 2026 and 2025 first fiscal quarter.

    The Company’s financing activities provided $1.0 million of cash during the 2026 first fiscal quarter from borrowings under the Company’s credit facility as compared to repayments under the Company’s credit facility of $3.1 during the 2025 first fiscal quarter.

    About ETC

    ETC was incorporated in 1969 in Pennsylvania. For over five decades, we have provided our customers with products, services, and support. Innovation, continuous technological improvement and enhancement, and product quality are core values that are critical to our success. We are a significant supplier and innovator in the following areas: (i) software driven products and services used to create and monitor the physiological effects of flight, including high performance jet tactical flight simulation, fixed and rotary wing upset prevention and recovery and spatial disorientation, and both suborbital and orbital commercial human spaceflight, collectively, Aircrew Training Systems (“ATS”); (ii) altitude (hypobaric) chambers; (iii) hyperbaric chambers for multiple persons (multiplace chambers); (iv) Advanced Disaster Management Simulators (“ADMS”); (v) steam and gas (ethylene oxide) sterilizers (“Sterilizer Systems” or “Sterilizers”); and (vi) Environmental Testing and Simulation Systems (“ETSS”).

    We operate in two primary business segments, Aerospace Solutions (“Aerospace”) and Commercial/Industrial Systems (“CIS”). Aerospace encompasses the design, manufacture, and sale of: (i) ATS products; (ii) altitude (hypobaric) chambers; (iii) hyperbaric chambers for multiple persons (multiplace chambers); and (iv) ADMS, as well as integrated logistics support (“ILS”) for customers who purchase these products or similar products manufactured by other parties. These products and services provide customers with an offering of comprehensive solutions for improved readiness and reduced operational costs. Sales of our Aerospace products are made principally to U.S. and foreign government agencies and to civil aviation organizations. CIS encompasses the design, manufacture, and sale of: (i) steam and gas (ethylene oxide) sterilizers; and (ii) ETSS; as well as parts and service support for customers who purchase these products or similar products manufactured by other parties. Sales of our CIS products are made principally to the healthcare, pharmaceutical, and automotive industries.

    ETC-PZL Aerospace Industries Sp. z o.o. (“ETC-PZL”), our 100%-owned subsidiary in Warsaw, Poland, is currently our only operating subsidiary. ETC-PZL manufactures certain simulators and provides software to support products manufactured domestically within our Aerospace segment.

    The majority of our net sales are generated from long-term contracts with foreign and U.S. governments and agencies (including foreign military sales (“FMS”) contracted through the U.S. Government) for the research, design, development, manufacture, integration, and sustainment of ATS products, including Chambers and the simulators manufactured and sold through ETC-PZL, collectively, ATS as well as long-term contracts with domestic and international customers for the sale of Sterilizer systems. The Company also enters into long-term contracts with domestic customers for the sale of ETSS. Net sales of ADMS are generally much shorter term in nature and vary between domestic and international customers. We generally provide our products and services under fixed-price contracts.

    ETC’s unique ability to offer complete systems, designed and produced to high technical standards, sets it apart from its competition. ETC’s headquarters is located in Southampton, PA. For more information about ETC, visit http://www.etcusa.com/. The information contained on our website is not incorporated by reference in this news release.

    Forward-looking Statements

    This news release contains forward-looking statements, which are based on management’s expectations and are subject to uncertainties and changes in circumstances. Words and expressions reflecting something other than historical fact are intended to identify forward-looking statements, and these statements may include words such as “may”, “will”, “should”, “expect”, “plan”, “anticipate”, “believe”, “estimate”, “future”, “predict”, “potential”, “intend”, or “continue”, and similar expressions. We base our forward-looking statements on our current expectations and projections about future events or future financial performance. Our forward-looking statements are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and assumptions about ETC and its subsidiaries that may cause actual results to be materially different from any future results implied by these forward-looking statements. We caution you not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. Except as required by law, we assume no obligation to update or revise any forward looking statements.

    Contact: Tim Kennedy, CFO
    Phone: (215) 355-9100 x1531
    E-mail: tkennedy@etcusa.com
       

    – Financial Table Follows –

    Table A                
    ENVIRONMENTAL TECTONICS CORPORATION  
    SUMMARY TABLE OF RESULTS  
    (in thousands, except per share information)  
    (unaudited)  
                     
      Thirteen weeks ended   Variance  
    (in thousands, except per share information) May 30, 2025   May 24, 2024   ($)   (%)  
    Net sales $ 17,601     $ 13,492     $ 4,109     30.5    
    Cost of goods sold   12,939       8,965       3,974     44.3    
    Gross Profit   4,662       4,527       135     3.0    
    Gross profit margin %   26.5 %     33.6 %     -7.1 %   -21.1 %  
                     
    Operating expenses   2,498       2,975       (477 )   -16.0    
    Operating income   2,164       1,552       612     39.4    
    Operating margin %   12.3 %     11.5 %     0.8 %   6.9 %  
                     
    Interest expense, net   563       116       447     385.3    
    Other (income) expense, net   (78 )     55       (133 )   -241.8    
    Income before income taxes   1,679       1,381       298     21.6    
    Pre-tax margin %   9.5 %     10.2 %     -0.7 %   -6.9 %  
                     
    Income tax provision   390       20       370     1850.0    
    Net income   1,289       1,361       (72 )   -5.3    
    Preferred Stock dividends   (121 )     (121 )     –     0.0    
    Income attributable to common and                
    participating shareholders $ 1,168     $ 1,240     $ (72 )   -5.8    
                     
    Per share information:                
    Basic earnings per common and participating share:                
    Distributed earnings per share:                
    Common $ –     $ –     $ –        
    Preferred $ 0.02     $ 0.02     $ –     0.0    
    Undistributed earnings per share:                
    Common $ 0.07     $ 0.08     $ (0.01 )   -12.5    
    Preferred $ 0.07     $ 0.08     $ (0.01 )   -12.5    
    Diluted earnings per share $ 0.07     $ 0.08     $ (0.01 )   -12.5    
                     
                     
    Total basic weighted average common and participating shares   15,665       15,569            
                     
    Total diluted weighted average shares   16,998       16,062            
     

    The MIL Network –

  • MIL-OSI: Hingham Savings Reports Second Quarter 2025 Results

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    HINGHAM, Mass., July 11, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — HINGHAM INSTITUTION FOR SAVINGS (NASDAQ: HIFS), Hingham, Massachusetts announced results for the quarter ended June 30, 2025.

    Earnings

    Net income for the quarter ended June 30, 2025 was $9,414,000 or $4.32 per share basic and $4.28 per share diluted, as compared to $4,102,000 or $1.88 per share basic and diluted for the same period last year. The Bank’s annualized return on average equity for the second quarter of 2025 was 8.43%, and the annualized return on average assets was 0.85%, as compared to 3.92% and 0.38% for the same period last year. Net income per share (diluted) for the second quarter of 2025 increased by 127.7% compared to the same period in 2024.

    Core net income for the quarter ended June 30, 2025, which represents net income excluding the after-tax net gain on equity securities, both realized and unrealized, was $7,453,000 or $3.42 per share basic and $3.39 per share diluted, as compared to $2,181,000 or $1.00 per share basic and per share diluted for the same period last year. The Bank’s annualized core return on average equity for the second quarter of 2025 was 6.67% and the annualized core return on average assets was 0.67%, as compared to 2.08% and 0.20% for the same period last year. Core net income per share (diluted) for the second quarter of 2025 increased by 239.0% compared to the same period in 2024.

    Net income for the six months ended June 30, 2025 was $16,538,000 or $7.58 per share basic and $7.52 per share diluted, as compared to $10,970,000 or $5.04 per share basic and $5.01 per share diluted for the same period last year. The Bank’s annualized return on average equity for the first six months of 2025 was 7.45%, and the annualized return on average assets was 0.75%, as compared to 5.27% and 0.50% for the same period in 2024. Net income per share (diluted) for the first six months of 2025 increased by 50.1% over the same period in 2024.

    Core net income for the six months ended June 30, 2025, which represents net income excluding the after-tax net gain on equity securities, both realized and unrealized, was $13,578,000 or $6.23 per share basic and $6.17 per share diluted, as compared to $4,395,000 or $2.02 per share basic and $2.01 per share diluted for the same period last year. The Bank’s annualized core return on average equity for the first six months of 2025 was 6.12%, and the annualized core return on average assets was 0.61%, as compared to 2.11% and 0.20% for the same period in 2024. Core net income per share (diluted) for the first six months of 2025 increased by 207.0% over the same period in 2024.

    See Page 10 for a reconciliation between Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) net income and Non-GAAP core net income. GAAP requires that gains and losses on equity securities, net of tax, realized and unrealized, be recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Income. In calculating core net income, the Bank did not make any adjustments other than those relating to the after-tax net gain on equity securities, both realized and unrealized. In the first six months of 2024, both net income and core net income were positively impacted by lower income tax expense driven by excess tax benefit associated with the exercise of stock options and the revision of state income tax estimates.

    Balance Sheet

    Total assets increased to $4.539 billion at June 30, 2025, representing 3.7% annualized growth year-to-date and a 0.4% increase from June 30, 2024.

    Net loans increased to $3.932 billion at June 30, 2025, representing 3.0% annualized growth year-to-date and stable when compared to June 30, 2024. Origination activity was concentrated in the Boston and Washington D.C. markets and remained focused on stabilized multifamily commercial real estate.

    Retail and commercial deposits were $1.998 billion at June 30, 2025, flat year-to-date and representing 4.0% growth from June 30, 2024. Non-interest-bearing deposits, included in retail and commercial deposits, were $437.6 million at June 30, 2025, representing 20.2% annualized growth year-to-date and 27.5% growth from June 30, 2024, while interest-bearing deposits fell, reflecting some specific customer business needs.

    Growth in non-interest bearing deposits in the first six months of 2025 continued to reflect the Bank’s focus on developing and deepening deposit relationships with new and existing commercial and non-profit customers. The Bank continues to invest in its Specialized Deposit Group, actively recruiting for talented relationship managers in Boston, Washington, and San Francisco, particularly as respected competitors exit these markets or merge with larger regional banks.

    The stability of the Bank’s balance sheet, as well as full and unlimited deposit insurance through the Bank’s participation in the Massachusetts Depositors Insurance Fund, continues to appeal to customers in times of uncertainty.

    Wholesale funds, which includes Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) borrowings, brokered deposits, and Internet listing service time deposits, were $2.052 billion at June 30, 2025 representing 6.0% annualized growth year-to-date and a 4.4% decline from June 30, 2024, as the Bank used these funds to replace certain commercial deposits in the second quarter of 2025. In the first six months of 2025, the Bank continued to manage its wholesale funding mix to lower its cost of funds while taking advantage of the inverted yield curve at certain durations by adding lower rate longer term liabilities. Wholesale deposits, which include brokered and Internet listing service time deposits, were $480.1 million at June 30, 2025, representing a 6.0% annualized decline year-to-date and a 3.5% decline from June 30, 2024. Borrowings from the FHLB totaled $1.572 billion at June 30, 2025, representing 10.0% annualized growth from December 31, 2024, and a 4.7% decline from June 30, 2024. As of June 30, 2025, the Bank maintained an additional $802.8 million in immediately available borrowing capacity at the FHLB of Boston and the Federal Reserve Bank, in addition to $360.6 million in cash and cash equivalents.

    Book value per share was $204.36 as of June 30, 2025, representing 6.4% annualized growth year-to-date and 6.8% growth from June 30, 2024. In addition to the increase in book value per share, the Bank declared $2.52 in dividends per share since June 30, 2024.

    On June 25, 2025, the Bank declared a regular cash dividend of $0.63 per share. This dividend will be paid on August 13, 2025 to stockholders of record as of August 4, 2025. This will be the Bank’s 126th consecutive quarterly dividend.

    The Bank has also generally declared special cash dividends in each of the last thirty years, typically in the fourth quarter, but did not declare a special dividend in 2024 and 2023. The Bank sets the level of the special dividend based on the Bank’s capital requirements and the prospective return on other capital allocation options, particularly the incremental return on capital from new loan originations and share repurchases. This may result in special dividends, if any, significantly above or below the regular quarterly dividend. Future regular and special dividends will be considered by the Board of Directors on a quarterly basis.

    Operational Performance Metrics

    The net interest margin for the quarter ended June 30, 2025 increased 16 basis points to 1.66%, as compared to 1.50% in the quarter ended March 31, 2025. This was the fifth consecutive quarter of continued expansion, despite the Federal Reserve’s federal funds rate target range remaining unchanged in 2025. This improvement was the result of a decline in the cost of interest-bearing liabilities, combined with an increase in the yield on interest-earning assets. The cost of interest-bearing liabilities fell 10 basis points in the second quarter of 2025, as the Bank’s retail and commercial deposits continued to reprice at lower rates, and the Bank continued to take advantage of the inverted yield curve by adding lower rate FHLB advances and brokered deposits. The yield on interest-earning assets increased by 5 basis points in the second quarter of 2025, driven primarily by a higher yield on loans, as the Bank continued to originate loans at higher rates and reprice existing loans. The net interest margin in the final month of the second quarter of 2025 was 1.72% annualized.

    Key credit and operational metrics remained acceptable in the second quarter of 2025. At June 30, 2025, non-performing assets totaled 0.70% of total assets, compared to 0.03% at December 31, 2024 and 0.04% at June 30, 2024. Non-performing loans as a percentage of the total loan portfolio totaled 0.81% at June 30, 2025, compared to 0.04% at both December 31, 2024 and June 30, 2024. The Bank did not record any charge-offs in the first six months of 2025 or 2024. In the second quarter of 2025, the Bank placed a commercial real estate loan with an outstanding balance of $30.6 million on nonaccrual, after the borrower failed to make the full payment due at maturity. This loan is secured by an entitled development site for a significant multifamily development in Washington, D.C. and has an associated conditional guarantee from a large national homebuilder and an affordable housing developer. The Bank is working actively to identify a resolution that protects the Bank’s interests. The remaining non-performing assets and loans cited above were and are residential, owner-occupant loans.

    As of June 30, 2025, the Bank only had the single above-mentioned non-performing commercial real estate loan, and no other commercial real estate delinquent loans. The Bank did not have any delinquent or non-performing commercial real estate loans as of December 31, 2024 or June 30, 2024. The Bank did not own any foreclosed property at June 30, 2025, December 31, 2024 or June 30, 2024.

    The efficiency ratio, as defined on page 5 below, decreased to 41.17% for the second quarter of 2025, as compared to 45.82% in the prior quarter and 68.57% for the same period last year. Operating expenses as a percentage of average assets were 0.68% for the second quarter of 2025, as compared to 0.68% for the prior quarter and 0.67% for the same period last year. This reflects, in part, continuing investment in deposit-gathering infrastructure and relatively stable average assets from period to period. As the efficiency ratio can be significantly influenced by the level of net interest income, the Bank utilizes these paired figures together to assess its operational efficiency over time. During periods of significant net interest income volatility, the efficiency ratio in isolation may over or understate the underlying operational efficiency of the Bank. The Bank remains focused on reducing waste through an ongoing process of continuous improvement and standard work that supports operational leverage.

    Chairman Robert H. Gaughen Jr. stated, “Returns on equity and assets in the second quarter of 2025 remained somewhat lower than our long-term performance expectations, although they have recovered significantly. Returns in our core business continue to improve steadily, driven by a continued expansion in the net interest margin through asset repricing, falling funding costs, and growth in non-interest bearing deposits. Our operational leverage remains critical to generating satisfactory returns and we remain focused on rigorous cost control and continuous operational improvement. Although our investment returns are likely to remain volatile in any individual period, they continue to contribute meaningfully to growth in book value per share over time.

    While this period has been extraordinarily challenging, the Bank’s business model has been built to compound shareholder capital over the long-term. We remain focused on careful capital allocation, defensive underwriting and rigorous cost control – the building blocks for compounding shareholder capital through all stages of the economic cycle. These remain constant, regardless of the macroeconomic environment in which we operate.”

    The Bank’s quarterly financial results are summarized in this earnings release, but shareholders are encouraged to read the Bank’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q, which is generally available several weeks after the earnings release. The Bank expects to file Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2025 with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) on or about August 6, 2025.

    Incorporated in 1834, Hingham Institution for Savings is one of America’s oldest banks. The Bank maintains offices in Boston, Nantucket, Washington, D.C., and San Francisco.

    The Bank’s shares of common stock are listed and traded on The NASDAQ Stock Market under the symbol HIFS.

     
    HINGHAM INSTITUTION FOR SAVINGS
    Selected Financial Ratios
           
      Three Months Ended
    June 30,    		   Six Months Ended
    June 30,
      2024   2025   2024   2025
    (Unaudited)                      
                           
    Key Performance Ratios                      
    Return on average assets (1) 0.38 %   0.85 %   0.50 %   0.75 %
    Return on average equity (1) 3.92     8.43     5.27     7.45  
    Core return on average assets (1) (5) 0.20     0.67     0.20     0.61  
    Core return on average equity (1) (5) 2.08     6.67     2.11     6.12  
    Interest rate spread (1) (2) 0.25     0.95     0.19     0.87  
    Net interest margin (1) (3) 0.96     1.66     0.91     1.58  
    Operating expenses to average assets (1) 0.67     0.68     0.67     0.68  
    Efficiency ratio (4) 68.57     41.17     72.63     43.36  
    Average equity to average assets 9.59     10.05     9.56     10.02  
    Average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities 119.93     122.94     119.92     122.60  
      June 30,
    2024    		   December 31,
    2024    		   June 30,
    2025
    (Unaudited)                      
               
    Asset Quality Ratios          
    Allowance for credit losses/total loans   0.68 %   0.69 %     0.70 %
    Allowance for credit losses/non-performing loans   1,577.28     1,775.00       86.97  
                         
    Non-performing loans/total loans   0.04     0.04       0.81  
    Non-performing loans/total assets   0.04     0.03       0.70  
    Non-performing assets/total assets   0.04     0.03       0.70  
                         
    Share Related                    
    Book value per share $ 191.34     $ 198.03     $ 204.36  
    Market value per share $ 178.88     $ 254.14     $ 248.35  
    Shares outstanding at end of period   2,180,250       2,180,250       2,181,250  
    (1)   Annualized.
         
    (2)   Interest rate spread represents the difference between the yield on interest-earning assets and the cost of interest-bearing liabilities.
         
    (3)   Net interest margin represents net interest income divided by average interest-earning assets.
         
    (4)   The efficiency ratio is a non-GAAP measure that represents total operating expenses, divided by the sum of net interest income and total other income, excluding the net gain on equity securities, both realized and unrealized.
         
    (5)   Non-GAAP measurements that represent return on average assets and return on average equity, excluding the after-tax net gain on equity securities, both realized and unrealized.
         
     
    HINGHAM INSTITUTION FOR SAVINGS
    Consolidated Balance Sheets
               
    (In thousands, except share amounts) June 30,
    2024    		   December 31,
    2024    		   June 30,
    2025
    (Unaudited)                      
    ASSETS  
                           
    Cash and due from banks $ 5,990     $ 4,183     $ 8,470  
    Federal Reserve and other short-term investments   363,151       347,647       352,144  
    Cash and cash equivalents   369,141       351,830       360,614  
                           
    CRA investment   8,722       8,769       8,928  
    Other marketable equity securities   83,860       104,575       113,761  
    Securities, at fair value   92,582       113,344       122,689  
    Securities held to maturity, at amortized cost   6,493       6,493       6,494  
    Federal Home Loan Bank stock, at cost   66,189       61,022       64,659  
    Loans, net of allowance for credit losses of $26,940 at June 30, 2024, $26,980 at December 31, 2024 and $27,730 at June 30, 2025   3,933,419       3,873,662       3,931,663  
    Bank-owned life insurance   13,805       13,980       14,143  
    Premises and equipment, net   16,676       16,397       16,180  
    Accrued interest receivable   9,082       8,774       8,962  
    Other assets   13,344       12,269       13,753  
    Total assets $ 4,520,731     $ 4,457,771     $ 4,539,157  
    LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY                      
                           
    Interest-bearing deposits $ 2,075,002     $ 2,094,626     $ 2,040,271  
    Non-interest-bearing deposits   343,262       397,469       437,608  
    Total deposits   2,418,264       2,492,095       2,477,879  
    Federal Home Loan Bank advances   1,648,675       1,497,000       1,572,000  
    Mortgagors’ escrow accounts   14,577       16,699       18,478  
    Accrued interest payable   12,242       8,244       12,959  
    Deferred income tax liability, net   989       3,787       4,629  
    Other liabilities   8,806       8,191       7,460  
    Total liabilities   4,103,553       4,026,016       4,093,405  
                           
    Stockholders’ equity:                      
    Preferred stock, $1.00 par value, 2,500,000 shares authorized, none issued   —       —       —  
    Common stock, $1.00 par value, 5,000,000 shares authorized; 2,180,250 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2024 and December 31, 2024, and 2,181,250 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2025   2,180       2,180       2,181  
    Additional paid-in capital   15,467       15,571       15,777  
    Undivided profits   399,531       414,004       427,794  
    Total stockholders’ equity   417,178       431,755       445,752  
    Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $ 4,520,731     $ 4,457,771     $ 4,539,157  
                           
     
    HINGHAM INSTITUTION FOR SAVINGS
    Consolidated Statements of Income
               
          Three Months Ended   Six Months Ended
          June 30,   June 30,
    (In thousands, except per share amounts) 2024
    		   2025
    		   2024   2025
    (Unaudited)                      
    Interest and dividend income:                            
      Loans $ 44,665     $ 46,752     $ 87,785     $ 91,973  
      Debt securities   87       97       132       192  
      Equity securities   1,551       1,365       3,001       2,816  
      Federal Reserve and other short-term investments   2,745       3,072       5,572       6,127  
        Total interest and dividend income   49,048       51,286       96,490       101,108  
    Interest expense:                              
      Deposits   22,141       17,841       43,287       36,462  
      Federal Home Loan Bank   16,539       15,406       33,751       30,571  
        Total interest expense   38,680       33,247       77,038       67,033  
        Net interest income   10,368       18,039       19,452       34,075  
    Provision for credit losses   180       450       288       750  
      Net interest income, after provision for credit losses   10,188       17,589       19,164       33,325  
    Other income:                              
      Customer service fees on deposits   138       139       275       274  
      Increase in cash surrender value of bank-owned life insurance   82       79       163       163  
      Gain on equity securities, net   2,464       2,516       8,434       3,797  
      Miscellaneous   49       73       104       122  
        Total other income   2,733       2,807       8,976       4,356  
    Operating expenses:                              
      Salaries and employee benefits   4,234       4,392       8,531       8,859  
      Occupancy and equipment   394       417       825       856  
      Data processing   738       758       1,493       1,482  
      Deposit insurance   819       784       1,629       1,532  
      Foreclosure and related   14       14       46       24  
      Marketing   187       222       276       358  
      Other general and administrative   908       959       1,721       1,905  
        Total operating expenses   7,294       7,546       14,521       15,016  
    Income before income taxes   5,627       12,850       13,619       22,665  
    Income tax provision   1,525       3,436       2,649       6,127  
        Net income $ 4,102     $ 9,414     $ 10,970     $ 16,538  
                                       
    Cash dividends declared per common share $ 0.63     $ 0.63     $ 1.26     $ 1.26  
                                   
    Weighted average shares outstanding:                              
      Basic   2,180       2,181       2,175       2,181  
      Diluted   2,186       2,200       2,189       2,200  
                                       
    Earnings per share:                              
      Basic $ 1.88     $ 4.32     $ 5.04     $ 7.58  
      Diluted $ 1.88     $ 4.28     $ 5.01     $ 7.52  
                                     
     
    HINGHAM INSTITUTION FOR SAVINGS
    Net Interest Income Analysis
       
      Three Months Ended
      June 30, 2024   March 31, 2025   June 30, 2025
      Average
    Balance
    (9)    		   Interest   Yield/
    Rate (10)    		   Average
    Balance
    (9)    		   Interest   Yield/
    Rate (10)    		   Average
    Balance
    (9)    		   Interest   Yield/
    Rate (10)
       
    (Dollars in thousands)  
    (Unaudited)                                                    
    Assets                                                    
    Loans (1) (2) $ 3,980,111   $ 44,665   4.49 %   $ 3,929,828   $ 45,221   4.67 %   $ 3,952,477   $ 46,752   4.74 %
    Securities (3) (4)   119,477     1,638   5.48       130,674     1,546   4.80       135,541     1,462   4.33  
    Short-term investments (5)   202,379     2,745   5.43       278,722     3,055   4.45       277,146     3,072   4.45  
    Total interest-earning assets   4,301,967     49,048   4.56       4,339,224     49,822   4.66       4,365,164     51,286   4.71  
    Other assets   66,218                 79,209                 78,230            
    Total assets $ 4,368,185               $ 4,418,433               $ 4,443,394            
                                                         
    Liabilities and stockholders’ equity:                                                    
    Interest-bearing deposits (6) $ 2,149,753   $ 22,141   4.12 %   $ 2,141,294   $ 18,621   3.53 %   $ 2,102,662   $ 17,841   3.40 %
    Borrowed funds   1,437,335     16,539   4.60       1,407,844     15,165   4.37       1,448,078     15,406   4.27  
    Total interest-bearing liabilities   3,587,088     38,680   4.31       3,549,138     33,786   3.86       3,550,740     33,247   3.76  
    Non-interest-bearing deposits   346,663                 413,877                 429,537            
    Other liabilities   15,503                 14,464                 16,378            
    Total liabilities   3,949,254                 3,977,479                 3,996,655            
    Stockholders’ equity   418,931                 440,954                 446,739            
    Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $ 4,368,185               $ 4,418,433               $ 4,443,394            
    Net interest income       $ 10,368               $ 16,036               $ 18,039      
                                                         
    Weighted average interest rate spread             0.25 %               0.80 %               0.95 %
                                                         
    Net interest margin (7)             0.96 %               1.50 %               1.66 %
    Average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities (8) 119.93 %   122.26 %   122.94 %  
    (1)   Before allowance for credit losses.
    (2)   Includes non-accrual loans.
    (3)   Excludes the impact of the average net unrealized gain or loss on securities.
    (4)   Includes Federal Home Loan Bank stock.
    (5)   Includes cash held at the Federal Reserve Bank.
    (6)   Includes mortgagors’ escrow accounts.
    (7)   Net interest income divided by average total interest-earning assets.
    (8)   Total interest-earning assets divided by total interest-bearing liabilities.
    (9)   Average balances are calculated on a daily basis.
    (10)   Annualized based on the actual number of days in the period.
         
     
    HINGHAM INSTITUTION FOR SAVINGS
    Net Interest Income Analysis
         
      Six Months Ended June 30,  
      2024     2025  
      Average
    Balance (9)    		   Interest   Yield/
    Rate (10)    		     Average
    Balance (9)    		   Interest   Yield/
    Rate (10)    		  
    (Dollars in thousands)                                  
    (Unaudited)                                  
                                       
    Loans (1) (2) $ 3,968,123   $ 87,785   4.42 %   $ 3,941,215   $ 91,973   4.71 %
    Securities (3) (4)   117,840     3,133   5.32       133,121     3,008   4.56  
    Short-term investments (5)   205,312     5,572   5.43       277,930     6,127   4.45  
    Total interest-earning assets   4,291,275     96,490   4.50       4,352,266     101,108   4.68  
    Other assets   65,126                 78,717            
    Total assets $ 4,356,401               $ 4,430,983            
                                       
    Interest-bearing deposits (6) $ 2,124,302   $ 43,287   4.08 %   $ 2,121,871   $ 36,462   3.47 %
    Borrowed funds   1,454,181     33,751   4.64       1,428,072     30,571   4.32  
    Total interest-bearing liabilities   3,578,483     77,038   4.31       3,549,943     67,033   3.81  
    Non-interest-bearing deposits   346,399                 421,750            
    Other liabilities   14,882                 15,428            
    Total liabilities   3,939,764                 3,987,121            
    Stockholders’ equity   416,637                 443,862            
    Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $ 4,356,401               $ 4,430,983            
    Net interest income       $ 19,452               $ 34,075      
                                       
    Weighted average interest rate spread             0.19 %               0.87 %
                                       
    Net interest margin (7)             0.91 %               1.58 %
                                       
    Average interest-earning assets
    to average interest-bearing
    liabilities (8)    		   119.92 %               122.60 %          
    (1)   Before allowance for credit losses.
    (2)   Includes non-accrual loans.
    (3)   Excludes the impact of the average net unrealized gain or loss on securities.
    (4)   Includes Federal Home Loan Bank stock.
    (5)   Includes cash held at the Federal Reserve Bank.
    (6)   Includes mortgagors’ escrow accounts.
    (7)   Net interest income divided by average total interest-earning assets.
    (8)   Total interest-earning assets divided by total interest-bearing liabilities.
    (9)   Average balances are calculated on a daily basis.
    (10)   Annualized based on the actual number of days in the period.
         
     
    HINGHAM INSTITUTION FOR SAVINGS
     Non-GAAP Reconciliation
     

    The Bank believes the presentation of the following non-GAAP financial measures provide useful supplemental information that is essential to an investor’s proper understanding of the results of operations and financial condition of the Bank. Management uses these measures in its analysis of the Bank’s performance. These non-GAAP measures should not be viewed as substitutes for the financial measures determined in accordance with GAAP, nor are they necessarily comparable to non-GAAP performance measures that may be presented by other banks.

    The table below presents the reconciliation between net income and core net income, a non-GAAP measurement that represents net income excluding the after-tax net gain on equity securities, both realized and unrealized.

      Three Months Ended   Six Months Ended
      June 30,   June 30,
    (In thousands, unaudited) 2024   2025   2024   2025
                       
    Non-GAAP reconciliation:                      
    Net income $ 4,102     $ 9,414     $ 10,970     $ 16,538  
    Gain on equity securities, net   (2,464 )     (2,516 )     (8,434 )     (3,797 )
    Income tax expense (1)   543       555       1,859       837  
    Core net income $ 2,181     $ 7,453     $ 4,395     $ 13,578  
    (1)   The equity securities are held in a tax-advantaged subsidiary corporation. The income tax effect of the gain on equity securities, net, was calculated using the effective tax rate applicable to the subsidiary.
         

    The table below presents the calculation of the efficiency ratio, a non-U.S. GAAP performance measure that management uses to assess operational efficiency which represents total operating expenses, divided by the sum of net interest income and total other income, excluding net gain on equity securities, both realized and unrealized.

      Three Months Ended   Six Months Ended  
      June 30,
    		   March 31,
    		   June 30,
    		   June 30,  
    (In thousands, unaudited) 2024   2025   2025   2024   2025  
                                         
    Non-U.S. GAAP efficiency ratio calculation:                                    
    Operating expenses $ 7,294       $ 7,470       $ 7,546     $ 14,521       $ 15,016    
                                         
    Net interest income $ 10,368       $ 16,036       $ 18,039     $ 19,452       $ 34,075    
    Other income   2,733         1,549         2,807       8,976         4,356    
    Gain on equity securities, net   (2,464 )       (1,281 )       (2,516 )     (8,434 )       (3,797 )  
    Total revenue $ 10,637       $ 16,304       $ 18,330     $ 19,994       $ 34,634    
                                         
    Efficiency ratio   68.57   %     45.82   %     41.17   %   72.63   %     43.36   %
                                                   

    CONTACT: Patrick R. Gaughen, President and Chief Operating Officer (781) 783-1761

    The MIL Network –

  • MIL-OSI: Hingham Savings Reports Second Quarter 2025 Results

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    HINGHAM, Mass., July 11, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — HINGHAM INSTITUTION FOR SAVINGS (NASDAQ: HIFS), Hingham, Massachusetts announced results for the quarter ended June 30, 2025.

    Earnings

    Net income for the quarter ended June 30, 2025 was $9,414,000 or $4.32 per share basic and $4.28 per share diluted, as compared to $4,102,000 or $1.88 per share basic and diluted for the same period last year. The Bank’s annualized return on average equity for the second quarter of 2025 was 8.43%, and the annualized return on average assets was 0.85%, as compared to 3.92% and 0.38% for the same period last year. Net income per share (diluted) for the second quarter of 2025 increased by 127.7% compared to the same period in 2024.

    Core net income for the quarter ended June 30, 2025, which represents net income excluding the after-tax net gain on equity securities, both realized and unrealized, was $7,453,000 or $3.42 per share basic and $3.39 per share diluted, as compared to $2,181,000 or $1.00 per share basic and per share diluted for the same period last year. The Bank’s annualized core return on average equity for the second quarter of 2025 was 6.67% and the annualized core return on average assets was 0.67%, as compared to 2.08% and 0.20% for the same period last year. Core net income per share (diluted) for the second quarter of 2025 increased by 239.0% compared to the same period in 2024.

    Net income for the six months ended June 30, 2025 was $16,538,000 or $7.58 per share basic and $7.52 per share diluted, as compared to $10,970,000 or $5.04 per share basic and $5.01 per share diluted for the same period last year. The Bank’s annualized return on average equity for the first six months of 2025 was 7.45%, and the annualized return on average assets was 0.75%, as compared to 5.27% and 0.50% for the same period in 2024. Net income per share (diluted) for the first six months of 2025 increased by 50.1% over the same period in 2024.

    Core net income for the six months ended June 30, 2025, which represents net income excluding the after-tax net gain on equity securities, both realized and unrealized, was $13,578,000 or $6.23 per share basic and $6.17 per share diluted, as compared to $4,395,000 or $2.02 per share basic and $2.01 per share diluted for the same period last year. The Bank’s annualized core return on average equity for the first six months of 2025 was 6.12%, and the annualized core return on average assets was 0.61%, as compared to 2.11% and 0.20% for the same period in 2024. Core net income per share (diluted) for the first six months of 2025 increased by 207.0% over the same period in 2024.

    See Page 10 for a reconciliation between Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) net income and Non-GAAP core net income. GAAP requires that gains and losses on equity securities, net of tax, realized and unrealized, be recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Income. In calculating core net income, the Bank did not make any adjustments other than those relating to the after-tax net gain on equity securities, both realized and unrealized. In the first six months of 2024, both net income and core net income were positively impacted by lower income tax expense driven by excess tax benefit associated with the exercise of stock options and the revision of state income tax estimates.

    Balance Sheet

    Total assets increased to $4.539 billion at June 30, 2025, representing 3.7% annualized growth year-to-date and a 0.4% increase from June 30, 2024.

    Net loans increased to $3.932 billion at June 30, 2025, representing 3.0% annualized growth year-to-date and stable when compared to June 30, 2024. Origination activity was concentrated in the Boston and Washington D.C. markets and remained focused on stabilized multifamily commercial real estate.

    Retail and commercial deposits were $1.998 billion at June 30, 2025, flat year-to-date and representing 4.0% growth from June 30, 2024. Non-interest-bearing deposits, included in retail and commercial deposits, were $437.6 million at June 30, 2025, representing 20.2% annualized growth year-to-date and 27.5% growth from June 30, 2024, while interest-bearing deposits fell, reflecting some specific customer business needs.

    Growth in non-interest bearing deposits in the first six months of 2025 continued to reflect the Bank’s focus on developing and deepening deposit relationships with new and existing commercial and non-profit customers. The Bank continues to invest in its Specialized Deposit Group, actively recruiting for talented relationship managers in Boston, Washington, and San Francisco, particularly as respected competitors exit these markets or merge with larger regional banks.

    The stability of the Bank’s balance sheet, as well as full and unlimited deposit insurance through the Bank’s participation in the Massachusetts Depositors Insurance Fund, continues to appeal to customers in times of uncertainty.

    Wholesale funds, which includes Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) borrowings, brokered deposits, and Internet listing service time deposits, were $2.052 billion at June 30, 2025 representing 6.0% annualized growth year-to-date and a 4.4% decline from June 30, 2024, as the Bank used these funds to replace certain commercial deposits in the second quarter of 2025. In the first six months of 2025, the Bank continued to manage its wholesale funding mix to lower its cost of funds while taking advantage of the inverted yield curve at certain durations by adding lower rate longer term liabilities. Wholesale deposits, which include brokered and Internet listing service time deposits, were $480.1 million at June 30, 2025, representing a 6.0% annualized decline year-to-date and a 3.5% decline from June 30, 2024. Borrowings from the FHLB totaled $1.572 billion at June 30, 2025, representing 10.0% annualized growth from December 31, 2024, and a 4.7% decline from June 30, 2024. As of June 30, 2025, the Bank maintained an additional $802.8 million in immediately available borrowing capacity at the FHLB of Boston and the Federal Reserve Bank, in addition to $360.6 million in cash and cash equivalents.

    Book value per share was $204.36 as of June 30, 2025, representing 6.4% annualized growth year-to-date and 6.8% growth from June 30, 2024. In addition to the increase in book value per share, the Bank declared $2.52 in dividends per share since June 30, 2024.

    On June 25, 2025, the Bank declared a regular cash dividend of $0.63 per share. This dividend will be paid on August 13, 2025 to stockholders of record as of August 4, 2025. This will be the Bank’s 126th consecutive quarterly dividend.

    The Bank has also generally declared special cash dividends in each of the last thirty years, typically in the fourth quarter, but did not declare a special dividend in 2024 and 2023. The Bank sets the level of the special dividend based on the Bank’s capital requirements and the prospective return on other capital allocation options, particularly the incremental return on capital from new loan originations and share repurchases. This may result in special dividends, if any, significantly above or below the regular quarterly dividend. Future regular and special dividends will be considered by the Board of Directors on a quarterly basis.

    Operational Performance Metrics

    The net interest margin for the quarter ended June 30, 2025 increased 16 basis points to 1.66%, as compared to 1.50% in the quarter ended March 31, 2025. This was the fifth consecutive quarter of continued expansion, despite the Federal Reserve’s federal funds rate target range remaining unchanged in 2025. This improvement was the result of a decline in the cost of interest-bearing liabilities, combined with an increase in the yield on interest-earning assets. The cost of interest-bearing liabilities fell 10 basis points in the second quarter of 2025, as the Bank’s retail and commercial deposits continued to reprice at lower rates, and the Bank continued to take advantage of the inverted yield curve by adding lower rate FHLB advances and brokered deposits. The yield on interest-earning assets increased by 5 basis points in the second quarter of 2025, driven primarily by a higher yield on loans, as the Bank continued to originate loans at higher rates and reprice existing loans. The net interest margin in the final month of the second quarter of 2025 was 1.72% annualized.

    Key credit and operational metrics remained acceptable in the second quarter of 2025. At June 30, 2025, non-performing assets totaled 0.70% of total assets, compared to 0.03% at December 31, 2024 and 0.04% at June 30, 2024. Non-performing loans as a percentage of the total loan portfolio totaled 0.81% at June 30, 2025, compared to 0.04% at both December 31, 2024 and June 30, 2024. The Bank did not record any charge-offs in the first six months of 2025 or 2024. In the second quarter of 2025, the Bank placed a commercial real estate loan with an outstanding balance of $30.6 million on nonaccrual, after the borrower failed to make the full payment due at maturity. This loan is secured by an entitled development site for a significant multifamily development in Washington, D.C. and has an associated conditional guarantee from a large national homebuilder and an affordable housing developer. The Bank is working actively to identify a resolution that protects the Bank’s interests. The remaining non-performing assets and loans cited above were and are residential, owner-occupant loans.

    As of June 30, 2025, the Bank only had the single above-mentioned non-performing commercial real estate loan, and no other commercial real estate delinquent loans. The Bank did not have any delinquent or non-performing commercial real estate loans as of December 31, 2024 or June 30, 2024. The Bank did not own any foreclosed property at June 30, 2025, December 31, 2024 or June 30, 2024.

    The efficiency ratio, as defined on page 5 below, decreased to 41.17% for the second quarter of 2025, as compared to 45.82% in the prior quarter and 68.57% for the same period last year. Operating expenses as a percentage of average assets were 0.68% for the second quarter of 2025, as compared to 0.68% for the prior quarter and 0.67% for the same period last year. This reflects, in part, continuing investment in deposit-gathering infrastructure and relatively stable average assets from period to period. As the efficiency ratio can be significantly influenced by the level of net interest income, the Bank utilizes these paired figures together to assess its operational efficiency over time. During periods of significant net interest income volatility, the efficiency ratio in isolation may over or understate the underlying operational efficiency of the Bank. The Bank remains focused on reducing waste through an ongoing process of continuous improvement and standard work that supports operational leverage.

    Chairman Robert H. Gaughen Jr. stated, “Returns on equity and assets in the second quarter of 2025 remained somewhat lower than our long-term performance expectations, although they have recovered significantly. Returns in our core business continue to improve steadily, driven by a continued expansion in the net interest margin through asset repricing, falling funding costs, and growth in non-interest bearing deposits. Our operational leverage remains critical to generating satisfactory returns and we remain focused on rigorous cost control and continuous operational improvement. Although our investment returns are likely to remain volatile in any individual period, they continue to contribute meaningfully to growth in book value per share over time.

    While this period has been extraordinarily challenging, the Bank’s business model has been built to compound shareholder capital over the long-term. We remain focused on careful capital allocation, defensive underwriting and rigorous cost control – the building blocks for compounding shareholder capital through all stages of the economic cycle. These remain constant, regardless of the macroeconomic environment in which we operate.”

    The Bank’s quarterly financial results are summarized in this earnings release, but shareholders are encouraged to read the Bank’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q, which is generally available several weeks after the earnings release. The Bank expects to file Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2025 with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) on or about August 6, 2025.

    Incorporated in 1834, Hingham Institution for Savings is one of America’s oldest banks. The Bank maintains offices in Boston, Nantucket, Washington, D.C., and San Francisco.

    The Bank’s shares of common stock are listed and traded on The NASDAQ Stock Market under the symbol HIFS.

     
    HINGHAM INSTITUTION FOR SAVINGS
    Selected Financial Ratios
           
      Three Months Ended
    June 30,    		   Six Months Ended
    June 30,
      2024   2025   2024   2025
    (Unaudited)                      
                           
    Key Performance Ratios                      
    Return on average assets (1) 0.38 %   0.85 %   0.50 %   0.75 %
    Return on average equity (1) 3.92     8.43     5.27     7.45  
    Core return on average assets (1) (5) 0.20     0.67     0.20     0.61  
    Core return on average equity (1) (5) 2.08     6.67     2.11     6.12  
    Interest rate spread (1) (2) 0.25     0.95     0.19     0.87  
    Net interest margin (1) (3) 0.96     1.66     0.91     1.58  
    Operating expenses to average assets (1) 0.67     0.68     0.67     0.68  
    Efficiency ratio (4) 68.57     41.17     72.63     43.36  
    Average equity to average assets 9.59     10.05     9.56     10.02  
    Average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities 119.93     122.94     119.92     122.60  
      June 30,
    2024    		   December 31,
    2024    		   June 30,
    2025
    (Unaudited)                      
               
    Asset Quality Ratios          
    Allowance for credit losses/total loans   0.68 %   0.69 %     0.70 %
    Allowance for credit losses/non-performing loans   1,577.28     1,775.00       86.97  
                         
    Non-performing loans/total loans   0.04     0.04       0.81  
    Non-performing loans/total assets   0.04     0.03       0.70  
    Non-performing assets/total assets   0.04     0.03       0.70  
                         
    Share Related                    
    Book value per share $ 191.34     $ 198.03     $ 204.36  
    Market value per share $ 178.88     $ 254.14     $ 248.35  
    Shares outstanding at end of period   2,180,250       2,180,250       2,181,250  
    (1)   Annualized.
         
    (2)   Interest rate spread represents the difference between the yield on interest-earning assets and the cost of interest-bearing liabilities.
         
    (3)   Net interest margin represents net interest income divided by average interest-earning assets.
         
    (4)   The efficiency ratio is a non-GAAP measure that represents total operating expenses, divided by the sum of net interest income and total other income, excluding the net gain on equity securities, both realized and unrealized.
         
    (5)   Non-GAAP measurements that represent return on average assets and return on average equity, excluding the after-tax net gain on equity securities, both realized and unrealized.
         
     
    HINGHAM INSTITUTION FOR SAVINGS
    Consolidated Balance Sheets
               
    (In thousands, except share amounts) June 30,
    2024    		   December 31,
    2024    		   June 30,
    2025
    (Unaudited)                      
    ASSETS  
                           
    Cash and due from banks $ 5,990     $ 4,183     $ 8,470  
    Federal Reserve and other short-term investments   363,151       347,647       352,144  
    Cash and cash equivalents   369,141       351,830       360,614  
                           
    CRA investment   8,722       8,769       8,928  
    Other marketable equity securities   83,860       104,575       113,761  
    Securities, at fair value   92,582       113,344       122,689  
    Securities held to maturity, at amortized cost   6,493       6,493       6,494  
    Federal Home Loan Bank stock, at cost   66,189       61,022       64,659  
    Loans, net of allowance for credit losses of $26,940 at June 30, 2024, $26,980 at December 31, 2024 and $27,730 at June 30, 2025   3,933,419       3,873,662       3,931,663  
    Bank-owned life insurance   13,805       13,980       14,143  
    Premises and equipment, net   16,676       16,397       16,180  
    Accrued interest receivable   9,082       8,774       8,962  
    Other assets   13,344       12,269       13,753  
    Total assets $ 4,520,731     $ 4,457,771     $ 4,539,157  
    LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY                      
                           
    Interest-bearing deposits $ 2,075,002     $ 2,094,626     $ 2,040,271  
    Non-interest-bearing deposits   343,262       397,469       437,608  
    Total deposits   2,418,264       2,492,095       2,477,879  
    Federal Home Loan Bank advances   1,648,675       1,497,000       1,572,000  
    Mortgagors’ escrow accounts   14,577       16,699       18,478  
    Accrued interest payable   12,242       8,244       12,959  
    Deferred income tax liability, net   989       3,787       4,629  
    Other liabilities   8,806       8,191       7,460  
    Total liabilities   4,103,553       4,026,016       4,093,405  
                           
    Stockholders’ equity:                      
    Preferred stock, $1.00 par value, 2,500,000 shares authorized, none issued   —       —       —  
    Common stock, $1.00 par value, 5,000,000 shares authorized; 2,180,250 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2024 and December 31, 2024, and 2,181,250 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2025   2,180       2,180       2,181  
    Additional paid-in capital   15,467       15,571       15,777  
    Undivided profits   399,531       414,004       427,794  
    Total stockholders’ equity   417,178       431,755       445,752  
    Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $ 4,520,731     $ 4,457,771     $ 4,539,157  
                           
     
    HINGHAM INSTITUTION FOR SAVINGS
    Consolidated Statements of Income
               
          Three Months Ended   Six Months Ended
          June 30,   June 30,
    (In thousands, except per share amounts) 2024
    		   2025
    		   2024   2025
    (Unaudited)                      
    Interest and dividend income:                            
      Loans $ 44,665     $ 46,752     $ 87,785     $ 91,973  
      Debt securities   87       97       132       192  
      Equity securities   1,551       1,365       3,001       2,816  
      Federal Reserve and other short-term investments   2,745       3,072       5,572       6,127  
        Total interest and dividend income   49,048       51,286       96,490       101,108  
    Interest expense:                              
      Deposits   22,141       17,841       43,287       36,462  
      Federal Home Loan Bank   16,539       15,406       33,751       30,571  
        Total interest expense   38,680       33,247       77,038       67,033  
        Net interest income   10,368       18,039       19,452       34,075  
    Provision for credit losses   180       450       288       750  
      Net interest income, after provision for credit losses   10,188       17,589       19,164       33,325  
    Other income:                              
      Customer service fees on deposits   138       139       275       274  
      Increase in cash surrender value of bank-owned life insurance   82       79       163       163  
      Gain on equity securities, net   2,464       2,516       8,434       3,797  
      Miscellaneous   49       73       104       122  
        Total other income   2,733       2,807       8,976       4,356  
    Operating expenses:                              
      Salaries and employee benefits   4,234       4,392       8,531       8,859  
      Occupancy and equipment   394       417       825       856  
      Data processing   738       758       1,493       1,482  
      Deposit insurance   819       784       1,629       1,532  
      Foreclosure and related   14       14       46       24  
      Marketing   187       222       276       358  
      Other general and administrative   908       959       1,721       1,905  
        Total operating expenses   7,294       7,546       14,521       15,016  
    Income before income taxes   5,627       12,850       13,619       22,665  
    Income tax provision   1,525       3,436       2,649       6,127  
        Net income $ 4,102     $ 9,414     $ 10,970     $ 16,538  
                                       
    Cash dividends declared per common share $ 0.63     $ 0.63     $ 1.26     $ 1.26  
                                   
    Weighted average shares outstanding:                              
      Basic   2,180       2,181       2,175       2,181  
      Diluted   2,186       2,200       2,189       2,200  
                                       
    Earnings per share:                              
      Basic $ 1.88     $ 4.32     $ 5.04     $ 7.58  
      Diluted $ 1.88     $ 4.28     $ 5.01     $ 7.52  
                                     
     
    HINGHAM INSTITUTION FOR SAVINGS
    Net Interest Income Analysis
       
      Three Months Ended
      June 30, 2024   March 31, 2025   June 30, 2025
      Average
    Balance
    (9)    		   Interest   Yield/
    Rate (10)    		   Average
    Balance
    (9)    		   Interest   Yield/
    Rate (10)    		   Average
    Balance
    (9)    		   Interest   Yield/
    Rate (10)
       
    (Dollars in thousands)  
    (Unaudited)                                                    
    Assets                                                    
    Loans (1) (2) $ 3,980,111   $ 44,665   4.49 %   $ 3,929,828   $ 45,221   4.67 %   $ 3,952,477   $ 46,752   4.74 %
    Securities (3) (4)   119,477     1,638   5.48       130,674     1,546   4.80       135,541     1,462   4.33  
    Short-term investments (5)   202,379     2,745   5.43       278,722     3,055   4.45       277,146     3,072   4.45  
    Total interest-earning assets   4,301,967     49,048   4.56       4,339,224     49,822   4.66       4,365,164     51,286   4.71  
    Other assets   66,218                 79,209                 78,230            
    Total assets $ 4,368,185               $ 4,418,433               $ 4,443,394            
                                                         
    Liabilities and stockholders’ equity:                                                    
    Interest-bearing deposits (6) $ 2,149,753   $ 22,141   4.12 %   $ 2,141,294   $ 18,621   3.53 %   $ 2,102,662   $ 17,841   3.40 %
    Borrowed funds   1,437,335     16,539   4.60       1,407,844     15,165   4.37       1,448,078     15,406   4.27  
    Total interest-bearing liabilities   3,587,088     38,680   4.31       3,549,138     33,786   3.86       3,550,740     33,247   3.76  
    Non-interest-bearing deposits   346,663                 413,877                 429,537            
    Other liabilities   15,503                 14,464                 16,378            
    Total liabilities   3,949,254                 3,977,479                 3,996,655            
    Stockholders’ equity   418,931                 440,954                 446,739            
    Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $ 4,368,185               $ 4,418,433               $ 4,443,394            
    Net interest income       $ 10,368               $ 16,036               $ 18,039      
                                                         
    Weighted average interest rate spread             0.25 %               0.80 %               0.95 %
                                                         
    Net interest margin (7)             0.96 %               1.50 %               1.66 %
    Average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities (8) 119.93 %   122.26 %   122.94 %  
    (1)   Before allowance for credit losses.
    (2)   Includes non-accrual loans.
    (3)   Excludes the impact of the average net unrealized gain or loss on securities.
    (4)   Includes Federal Home Loan Bank stock.
    (5)   Includes cash held at the Federal Reserve Bank.
    (6)   Includes mortgagors’ escrow accounts.
    (7)   Net interest income divided by average total interest-earning assets.
    (8)   Total interest-earning assets divided by total interest-bearing liabilities.
    (9)   Average balances are calculated on a daily basis.
    (10)   Annualized based on the actual number of days in the period.
         
     
    HINGHAM INSTITUTION FOR SAVINGS
    Net Interest Income Analysis
         
      Six Months Ended June 30,  
      2024     2025  
      Average
    Balance (9)    		   Interest   Yield/
    Rate (10)    		     Average
    Balance (9)    		   Interest   Yield/
    Rate (10)    		  
    (Dollars in thousands)                                  
    (Unaudited)                                  
                                       
    Loans (1) (2) $ 3,968,123   $ 87,785   4.42 %   $ 3,941,215   $ 91,973   4.71 %
    Securities (3) (4)   117,840     3,133   5.32       133,121     3,008   4.56  
    Short-term investments (5)   205,312     5,572   5.43       277,930     6,127   4.45  
    Total interest-earning assets   4,291,275     96,490   4.50       4,352,266     101,108   4.68  
    Other assets   65,126                 78,717            
    Total assets $ 4,356,401               $ 4,430,983            
                                       
    Interest-bearing deposits (6) $ 2,124,302   $ 43,287   4.08 %   $ 2,121,871   $ 36,462   3.47 %
    Borrowed funds   1,454,181     33,751   4.64       1,428,072     30,571   4.32  
    Total interest-bearing liabilities   3,578,483     77,038   4.31       3,549,943     67,033   3.81  
    Non-interest-bearing deposits   346,399                 421,750            
    Other liabilities   14,882                 15,428            
    Total liabilities   3,939,764                 3,987,121            
    Stockholders’ equity   416,637                 443,862            
    Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $ 4,356,401               $ 4,430,983            
    Net interest income       $ 19,452               $ 34,075      
                                       
    Weighted average interest rate spread             0.19 %               0.87 %
                                       
    Net interest margin (7)             0.91 %               1.58 %
                                       
    Average interest-earning assets
    to average interest-bearing
    liabilities (8)    		   119.92 %               122.60 %          
    (1)   Before allowance for credit losses.
    (2)   Includes non-accrual loans.
    (3)   Excludes the impact of the average net unrealized gain or loss on securities.
    (4)   Includes Federal Home Loan Bank stock.
    (5)   Includes cash held at the Federal Reserve Bank.
    (6)   Includes mortgagors’ escrow accounts.
    (7)   Net interest income divided by average total interest-earning assets.
    (8)   Total interest-earning assets divided by total interest-bearing liabilities.
    (9)   Average balances are calculated on a daily basis.
    (10)   Annualized based on the actual number of days in the period.
         
     
    HINGHAM INSTITUTION FOR SAVINGS
     Non-GAAP Reconciliation
     

    The Bank believes the presentation of the following non-GAAP financial measures provide useful supplemental information that is essential to an investor’s proper understanding of the results of operations and financial condition of the Bank. Management uses these measures in its analysis of the Bank’s performance. These non-GAAP measures should not be viewed as substitutes for the financial measures determined in accordance with GAAP, nor are they necessarily comparable to non-GAAP performance measures that may be presented by other banks.

    The table below presents the reconciliation between net income and core net income, a non-GAAP measurement that represents net income excluding the after-tax net gain on equity securities, both realized and unrealized.

      Three Months Ended   Six Months Ended
      June 30,   June 30,
    (In thousands, unaudited) 2024   2025   2024   2025
                       
    Non-GAAP reconciliation:                      
    Net income $ 4,102     $ 9,414     $ 10,970     $ 16,538  
    Gain on equity securities, net   (2,464 )     (2,516 )     (8,434 )     (3,797 )
    Income tax expense (1)   543       555       1,859       837  
    Core net income $ 2,181     $ 7,453     $ 4,395     $ 13,578  
    (1)   The equity securities are held in a tax-advantaged subsidiary corporation. The income tax effect of the gain on equity securities, net, was calculated using the effective tax rate applicable to the subsidiary.
         

    The table below presents the calculation of the efficiency ratio, a non-U.S. GAAP performance measure that management uses to assess operational efficiency which represents total operating expenses, divided by the sum of net interest income and total other income, excluding net gain on equity securities, both realized and unrealized.

      Three Months Ended   Six Months Ended  
      June 30,
    		   March 31,
    		   June 30,
    		   June 30,  
    (In thousands, unaudited) 2024   2025   2025   2024   2025  
                                         
    Non-U.S. GAAP efficiency ratio calculation:                                    
    Operating expenses $ 7,294       $ 7,470       $ 7,546     $ 14,521       $ 15,016    
                                         
    Net interest income $ 10,368       $ 16,036       $ 18,039     $ 19,452       $ 34,075    
    Other income   2,733         1,549         2,807       8,976         4,356    
    Gain on equity securities, net   (2,464 )       (1,281 )       (2,516 )     (8,434 )       (3,797 )  
    Total revenue $ 10,637       $ 16,304       $ 18,330     $ 19,994       $ 34,634    
                                         
    Efficiency ratio   68.57   %     45.82   %     41.17   %   72.63   %     43.36   %
                                                   

    CONTACT: Patrick R. Gaughen, President and Chief Operating Officer (781) 783-1761

    The MIL Network –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Debates – Thursday, 10 July 2025 – Strasbourg – Revised edition

    Source: European Parliament
    Verbatim report of proceedings
     455k  820k
    Thursday, 10 July 2025 – Strasbourg
    1. Opening of the sitting
      2. Council position at first reading (Rule 64)
      3. Post-2027 Common Agricultural Policy (debate)
      4. European Citizens’ Initiative ‘Cohesion policy for the equality of the regions and sustainability of the regional cultures’ (debate)
      5. Resumption of the sitting
      6. Voting time
        6.1. Motion of censure on the Commission (B10-0319/2025) (vote)
        6.2. Case of Ryan Cornelius in Dubai (RC-B10-0328/2025, B10-0328/2025, B10-0333/2025, B10-0336/2025, B10-0340/2025, B10-0341/2025) (vote)
        6.3. Arbitrary arrest and torture of Belgian-Portuguese researcher Joseph Figueira Martin in the Central African Republic (RC-B10-0327/2025, B10-0323/2025, B10-0327/2025, B10-0334/2025, B10-0339/2025, B10-0342/2025) (vote)
        6.4. Urgent need to protect religious minorities in Syria following the recent terrorist attack on Mar Elias Church in Damascus (RC-B10-0335/2025, B10-0325/2025, B10-0335/2025, B10-0338/2025, B10-0343/2025, B10-0344/2025, B10-0345/2025, B10-0346/2025, B10-0347/2025) (vote)
        6.5. Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 as regards obligations of economic operators concerning battery due diligence policies (A10-0134/2025 – Antonio Decaro) (vote)
        6.6. Future of the EU biotechnology and biomanufacturing sector: leveraging research, boosting innovation and enhancing competitiveness (A10-0123/2025 – Hildegard Bentele) (vote)
        6.7. Tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictions (RC-B10-0324/2025, B10-0324/2025, B10-0326/2025, B10-0329/2025, B10-0330/2025, B10-0331/2025, B10-0332/2025) (vote)
      7. Resumption of the sitting
      8. Approval of the minutes of the sitting
      9. Composition of committees and delegations
      10. Endometriosis: Europe’s wake-up call on the gender health gap (debate)
      11. Oral explanations of vote (Rule 201)
        11.1. Motion of censure on the Commission (B10-0319/2025)
        11.2. Tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictions (RC-B10-0324/2025)
      12. Explanations of votes in writing (Rule 201)
      13. Approval of the minutes of the sitting and forwarding of texts adopted
      14. Dates of the next part-session
      15. Closure of the sitting
      16. Adjournment of the session

       

    IN THE CHAIR: CHRISTEL SCHALDEMOSE
    Vice-President

    		  
    1. Opening of the sitting

       

    (The sitting opened at 09:00)

    		  

    2. Council position at first reading (Rule 64)

    		 

      President. – The President has received from the Council its position at first reading regarding amending Directive 2008/98/EC on waste.

    The President has also received the reasons which led to its adoption and the position and opinion of the Commission. The full title will be published in the minutes of today’s sitting.

    The three-month period available to Parliament to adopt its position begins tomorrow, 11 July 2025.

    		  

    3. Post-2027 Common Agricultural Policy (debate)

    		 

      Christophe Hansen, Member of the Commission. – Madam President, honourable Members, dear colleagues, thank you very much for putting this important point up for the plenary debate today. I believe this is a testimony of how important the common agricultural policy is for this House. I can reassure you that it is equally important for the European Commission.

    The CAP is one of our oldest policies at the heart of the European project. In December 1964, Sicco Mansholt stated: ‘the governments, the Member countries burnt the individual boats in which they have sailed home to the harbours of national agricultural policy. Henceforth there is only a common policy, a policy of European solidarity.’ This statement is as relevant as it was 60 years ago.

    The CAP is a true common policy, a policy of solidarity, an anchor of European food sovereignty and an integral part of European integration. While in the 1960s, we were rebuilding our continent after the devastation of the war, we are now building a stronger Europe. A stronger Europe, that can withstand the multiple challenges it is facing.

    The security architecture that we relied on for decades can no longer be taken for granted. Russia’s unprovoked aggression has brought war back to our continent. Extreme weather events are more and more frequent due to climate change. The new normal is anything but normal. Therefore, our future budget and our policies must keep pace with that changing world.

    Yet, if the changing geopolitical realities teach us one thing, it is the strategic importance of food production. You cannot build a strong continent on an empty stomach, ladies and gentlemen. This was the driving force behind Mansholt’s policy and it is just as relevant today. Therefore, as the Commission President stated, in our next budget, there will be a central place for cohesion policy and the common agricultural policy.

    Our regions and our farmers will always be at the heart of the Union. The Commission fully acknowledges that the CAP plays a pivotal and strategic role in maintaining Europe’s food sovereignty at all times, in particular in the current challenging geopolitical setting. At the same time, thanks to our farmers, the EU is also a major exporter of food, contributing to global food security. Our farmers and rural areas feel the increasing pressure, from the impact of global uncertainties and climate change to the major challenge of generational renewal. At the same time, they are, as custodians of their land, making great efforts to contribute to our environmental and climate objectives, while ensuring also food security.

    The Commission’s communication, ‘The Road to the next Multiannual Financial Framework’, clearly puts food security among the key priority areas for funding in the future MFF. But our CAP must be modernised and better adapted to today’s challenges. We need a common agricultural policy that is fit for purpose and better targeted, enhances environmental and social outcomes, and fosters thriving rural areas.

    For this, we have over time built a policy with a coherent toolbox that helps provide a fair income for farmers, safe and affordable food for consumers, and respect for the environment we work in. I fully agree that we need to maintain this coherent toolbox, and the commonness and integrity of the common agricultural policy. I want to reassure you that we are working in this direction.

    While we should build our future based on our past successes, we need a CAP that is simpler and finds the right balance between incentives, investment and regulation, and must ensure that farmers have a fair and sufficient income. With the simplification package, we have chartered the way for the future CAP by streamlining overlapping requirements and prioritising incentives, building on the current eco‑schemes and agri‑environmental measures, while reducing red tape for our farmers and administrations.

    We intend to continue on this path and I hope that this Parliament will soon have a common position on that simplification package in order to deliver for our farmers already for the next calendar year. This will be crucial that they feel that our efforts are felt on the farm as well. We will also make sure our policy is better targeted, in particular towards the farmers that actively farm and contribute to our food security and the preservation of the environment.

    We must improve also the fairness in the distribution of funds. Our tools have to deliver the most disadvantaged sectors and regions. We have many regions in the EU that depend on livestock as the only source of income. The added value the EU can bring to these regions is real and is tangible.

    Without agricultural activity, land abandonment will cause demographic, environmental and societal problems. In certain regions, we would even have a security problem on top. Look at our eastern border regions that I visited, the Baltics and Finland, which have a common border to Russia, and I have to say, without agriculture and forestry, there would not be much economic activity and human presence left, and that would represent a huge weakness to us. In this sense, these freedom farmers greatly contribute to the EU’s line of defence.

    I would also like to emphasise the crucial role that cohesion policy plays in strengthening our rural areas and regions. Investments in local infrastructure, transport, clean energy, SMEs, broadband, health and education all enhance economic and societal cohesion. This is of growing importance in the context of ensuring the right to stay for all in the place they call home by supporting what a community needs.

    Furthermore, the mid‑term review of cohesion policy provides incentives and flexibilities for objectives such as water resilience, housing, energy transition, and greater competitiveness and innovation. It also provides specific incentives to eastern border regions, which face the dual challenge of increasing security and relaunching their economies.

    Furthermore, with the rising uncertainties due to climate and geopolitical impacts, the EU must continue ensuring an adequate safety net for our farmers in the form of risk and crisis management – a true unity safety net to alleviate the pressure and de‑risk the operations of our farmers and food industry.

    Honourable Members, these elements must, in my view, be recognised when we shape our future policy and also spend the future budget, while we are building on the success of the CAP. This has brought us up here till today. How exactly to do that will be the subject of the discussion with the co‑legislators and with you. Therefore, I look forward as well to hearing your views.

    In conclusion, I believe that the new financial framework presents an opportunity to build on the current CAP and to strengthen our policy response to achieve competitiveness, resilience, innovation and sustainability objectives in a more effective manner, while also ensuring that solutions are designed by taking into account local specificities and sectorial challenges.

    Finally, I would like to thank as well especially the agriculture committee for accelerating its work on the own‑initiative report by Ms Crespo Díaz. This will also allow me to take on board the main points and the main requests of this House when it comes to designing the future of our common agricultural policy, and that is how it has to be. I would like to thank you as well for that very valuable contribution.

    		  
       

    		 

      Herbert Dorfmann, im Namen der PPE-Fraktion. – Frau Präsidentin, Herr Kommissar, Kolleginnen und Kollegen! In wenigen Tagen werden wir einen Vorschlag für die GAP und deren Finanzierung bis zum Jahr 2035 auf dem Tisch haben, und ich habe den Eindruck, die Vorzeichen sind – gelinde gesagt – nicht die besten. Da plant man wohl offensichtlich aus jenen Politiken, die bisher das Herz der Europäischen Union ausgemacht haben – die Landwirtschaft, aber auch die Kohäsion, grenzüberschreitende Zusammenarbeit, auch andere –, so eine Art Eintopf zu machen, wo man dann nicht mehr sieht, welche Zutaten im Topf wirklich drinnen sind. Ich habe ein bisschen den Eindruck, es ist, wie wenn man so einen Eintopf kocht: Man will den Topf voll haben, aber nicht zeigen, dass man zu wenig Fleisch hat.

    Nur zwei Zahlen: Wenn wir die finanzielle Ausstattung der Gemeinsamen Agrarpolitik in absoluten Zahlen unverändert lassen im Verhältnis zu heute, dann wird diese Politik 2035 rund ein Drittel weniger Geld, in Kaufkraft gemessen, haben als 2020. Wenn wir um 15 % kürzen, dann bleibt noch die Hälfte von dem Geld übrig, das wir in Kaufkraft 2020 hatten. Wir hungern die Politik also systematisch aus.

    Der sichere Zugang zu Lebensmitteln wird aber eine zentrale Herausforderung für die Gesellschaft von morgen werden. Wenn wir in der Europäischen Union nicht mehr bereit sind, in diesen Sektor zu investieren, junge Leute anzuziehen, die bereit sind, in die Landwirtschaft zu gehen, dann werden wir unsere Ernährungssouveränität Schritt für Schritt verlieren.

    Das bedeutet natürlich nicht, Herr Kommissar, da gebe ich Ihnen recht, dass man nicht auch Veränderungen machen muss in der Politik – und meine Fraktion ist bereit, darüber zu diskutieren und auch zu schauen, wie man Geld effizienter ausgeben kann. Aber wir brauchen keinen Finanzierungseintopf, wir brauchen einen gesicherten und ausreichenden Haushalt für die Landwirtschaft. Und wir brauchen vor allem eine eigenständige Gesetzgebung für die gemeinsame Agrarpolitik und keine generellen Richtlinien für nationale Landwirtschaftspolitiken. Wir brauchen keine Renationalisierung dieser Politik, das würde am Ende auch die Regionen schwächen in der Zuständigkeit.

    Ich hoffe wirklich, dass wir am nächsten Mittwoch eine selbstbewusste Kommission erleben, eine Kommission, die ihre Kompetenzen verteidigt und die auch ihre Politiken verteidigt und dafür kämpft, dass diese finanziert werden. Herr Kommissar, seien Sie versichert, dann werden wir mit Ihnen kämpfen. Ich werde aber nicht bereit sein, einer Gemeinsamen Agrarpolitik zuzustimmen, welche die europäische Landwirtschaft aufs Spiel setzt.

    		  
       

    		 

      Dario Nardella, a nome del gruppo S&D. – Era per chiarire meglio la nostra preoccupazione sui possibili tagli al bilancio pluriennale per le politiche agricole, una preoccupazione che sappiamo di condividere con il signor Commissario, perché, senza risorse, la redditività dei nostri agricoltori sarà ancora più a rischio, la sicurezza alimentare sarà ancora più a rischio, lo sviluppo delle aree regionali europee sarà ancora più a rischio.

    Dunque, noi diciamo con forza che non accetteremo alcun tipo di taglio e neanche la riduzione o limitazione dell’autonomia legislativa sulla politica agricola attraverso un modello di negoziazione nazionale o un bilancio unificato europeo. Degli indirizzi abbiamo detto con chiarezza che vogliamo un’agricoltura sostenibile, aiutare i piccoli agricoltori, migliorare le condizioni dei consumatori e le filiere.

    Per questo siamo accanto a Lei, signor Commissario, in una battaglia che dobbiamo portare avanti insieme perché l’agricoltura è un pilastro del modello dell’integrazione europea.

    		  
       

    		 

      Raffaele Stancanelli, a nome del gruppo PfE. – Signora Presidente, grazie per la Sua presenza, signor Commissario, onorevoli colleghi, lunedì abbiamo votato in commissione la INI sul futuro dell’agricoltura.

    Come Patrioti abbiamo votato a favore per oltre 50 compromessi, apprezzando il no al fondo unico, un budget adeguato nel quadro finanziario pluriennale e la semplificazione amministrativa.

    Ci siamo astenuti, invece, sul voto finale, per il modo vago con cui sono difesi i pagamenti diretti alla presenza ancora del 25 % per gli ecoschemi, un’astensione di denuncia, anche.

    Il Parlamento europeo non può limitarsi ad affrontare una proposta sulla futura PAC discutendola solo in commissione AGRI, senza un voto in plenaria. Il Parlamento, di fatto, ha rinunciato al suo ruolo.

    Questa battaglia la perderemo, se non saremo capaci, Commissario, di contrastare una proposta che stravolge il concetto stesso di sostegno, subordinando i fondi destinati agli agricoltori a una logica di condizionalità. Gli agricoltori ci hanno chiesto una politica agricola più vicina a loro, più concreta: ripristiniamola quale sostegno al reddito e togliamo gli elementi che lo deprivano.

    Si sta perdendo un’occasione per ribadire che il Parlamento vuole una politica diversa da quella di qualche funzionario della Commissione. Non volete affrontare i temi fondamentali che gli agricoltori hanno sollevato nel 2024? Noi siamo al loro fianco, e Le chiedo, signor Commissario, e chiedo a ogni parlamentare che ha a cuore l’agricoltura…

    (La Presidente toglie la parola all’oratore)

    		  
       

    		 

      Carlo Fidanza, a nome del gruppo ECR. – Signora Presidente, signor Commissario, onorevoli colleghi, oggi più che mai la politica agricola comune deve essere difesa e rafforzata, perché la PAC – e con essa il cibo che produciamo – non è soltanto uno strumento economico, è una garanzia di stabilità, di autonomia e di sicurezza per l’intera Unione europea.

    La sicurezza alimentare non può essere data per scontata: le guerre alle porte dell’Europa, le tensioni globali sulle catene di approvvigionamento, gli eventi meteorologici estremi, tutto ci dimostra che il cibo non è solo un bene, è una leva geopolitica, è una questione strategica, e non possiamo permetterci di dipendere sempre di più da paesi terzi, se vogliamo garantire cibo a sufficienza buono e sano ai nostri cittadini.

    Per questo, ogni proposta di taglio dei fondi PAC, dentro o fuori dal cosiddetto fondo unico, è non solo inaccettabile, ma miope. Tagliare la PAC significa indebolire i nostri agricoltori, mettere a rischio le aree rurali e consegnare all’instabilità esterna una parte cruciale della nostra sovranità.

    E allora chiediamo una PAC forte, autonoma, adeguatamente finanziata, ma anche una PAC più moderna, indirizzata a chi davvero produce, a chi fa innovazione, a chi fa qualità, a chi deve fare i conti con accordi commerciali senza reciprocità, a crisi di mercato, a patologie animali e calamità naturali sempre più frequenti; una PAC senza più follie ideologiche green, ma con incentivi e premialità per chi investe in sostenibilità.

    Questa è la PAC che chiediamo, questa è la PAC che difenderemo, come ci hanno chiesto e ci chiedono milioni di agricoltori europei.

    		  
       

    		 

      Elsi Katainen, Renew-ryhmän puolesta. – Arvoisa puhemies, hyvä komission jäsen, tämä kausi alkoi maatalouden ja ruokapolitiikan osalta todella vahvasti. Strateginen dialogi ja maatalouden visio antoivat ymmärtää, että maatalouden merkitys tässä kriittisessä maailman ajassa on vihdoinkin ymmärretty. Nyt vaikuttaa kuitenkin siltä, että komissio on leikkaamassa rajusti ruokaturvamme rahoituksesta.

    Kokonaisturvallisuuden yksi keskeinen kulmakivi on omavarainen ruuantuotanto. Tuotannosta vastaavat viljelijät kohtaavat epävarmuutta ilmastohaasteista ja geopolitiikasta – varsinkin meillä itärajalla – aina kannattavuusongelmiin saakka. Siksi EU:n on turvattava edellytykset kestävälle ja kannattavalle maataloudelle. On luotava vakaat poliittiset olot ja investointivarmuutta. Epävarmuutta tuovat myös vapaakaupan mukanaan tuoma kaksoisstandardin uhka, jota ei voi hyväksyä. Myös EU:n laajeneminen tuo paljon sumuisia näkymiä eteemme.

    Maatalouspolitiikan yksinkertaistaminen tukee myös ympäristö- ja ilmastotekoja. Digitaalisten työkalujen ja ilmastoälykkäiden ratkaisujen vieminen tilatasolle on jo arkipäivää. Sitä pitää edistää. Paljon on kuitenkin muututtava, jos haluamme nuorten hakeutuvan maaseudun elinkeinojen piiriin. Heille on luotava kannustava ilmapiiri, rahoitusta ja koulutusta niin, että he voivat edelleen kehittää kannattavaa ja kestävää maataloutta. Hyvä komission jäsen, arvostan ponnistelujanne ja toivon myös meidän ryhmämme puolesta, että nämä prioriteetit näkyvät tulevassa maatalouspolitiikassa.

    		  
       

    		 

      Thomas Waitz, im Namen der Verts/ALE-Fraktion. – Frau Präsidentin, Herr Kommissar! Dürre, extreme Hitze, Überschwemmungen und dann gefolgt von Hagel – das ist die Realität, mit der unsere Bäuerinnen und Bauern im Moment draußen arbeiten müssen. Sie sind die ersten Betroffenen der Auswirkungen der Klimakrise und des Artenverlustes, gepaart mit unfairen Preisen, mit Preisen, die oft unterhalb der Produktionskosten sind, mit einer Übermacht an Supermärkten. Das erzeugt 800 Betriebe jeden Tag, die in der Europäischen Union zusperren. Derweil liegen Lösungen am Tisch: Durch gestärkte regionale Vermarktung, lokale und regionale Beschaffung, durch Anpassungsmaßnahmen an den Klimawandel können wir unsere Landwirtschaft unterstützen. Eine Landwirtschaft im Einklang mit der Natur ist möglich. Eine Landwirtschaft, die nicht Tiere quält, ist möglich. Innovative Betriebe in ganz Europa zeigen das vor. Ob das regenerative Landwirtschaft, agrarökologische Methoden oder eben der biologische Landbau sind.

    Wir müssen sicherstellen, dass jene Anforderungen, die wir an europäische Landwirte stellen, auch bei importierten Produkten gleichermaßen gelten. Ein verringertes Budget für die europäische Landwirtschaft, gepaart mit Handelsverträgen wie Mercosur oder vielleicht jetzt neuerdings auch einem mit Trump, um Trump in seinem Zollwahnsinn zu beruhigen, das setzt unsere Landwirtschaft und unsere Bäuerinnen und Bauern aufs Spiel. Wir brauchen eine europäische Politik, die europäisches Steuergeld für europäische Bäuerinnen und Bauern, für die Produktion von naturfreundlichen, klimafreundlichen und tierfreundlichen Produkten in Europa unterstützt, für europäische Bürger und Bürgerinnen. Darauf müssen wir uns konzentrieren und endlich aus dieser Weltmarktideologie aussteigen. Europäisches Geld für europäische Landwirtschaft, für europäische Bürger und Bürgerinnen!

    		  
       

    		 

      Luke Ming Flanagan, on behalf of The Left Group. – Madam President, Commissioner, good to talk to you again. I actually think that the current structure of CAP could actually be quite good, and I think many of the people who complain about it have never read it and are just being populist. If they did actually read it and look at it, they could see that if it was applied correctly, it could actually be very good, and it’s why I voted for it in the first place.

    When it comes to fairness, the current CAP structure allows for more fairness. We have a maximum convergence rate of 85 %. Ireland never went any further than that. What I would suggest next time around is to put it at 100 %.

    When it comes to smaller farms, in the current CAP structure, we have CRISS, a minimum of 10 % has to go to smaller farms. Very few countries went higher than the 10 %. I would suggest in the new CAP that we actually put it higher than that, and countries and regions that have gone as high as 22 % have actually seen good results.

    When it comes to the environment, eco-schemes, the minimum you can do is 25 %, countries can go further if they wish. And I’ve seen countries with the Green Party in coalition that haven’t gone further – they should have and they could have.

    But ultimately this is about funding. We are at only 40 % of the funding that we were at in 1991 in Ireland. We need to increase that. You talk about strategic autonomy. European countries are talking about spending 5 % of GDP on weapons. We’re not even willing to spend 0.5 % of GDP on our food. We need to spend it on food before we spend it on weapons. That’s our…

    (The President cut off the speaker)

    		  
       

    		 

      Arno Bausemer, im Namen der ESN-Fraktion. – Frau Präsidentin, Herr Kommissar, meine sehr verehrten Damen und Herren! Die Zahl der Betriebe in der Landwirtschaft ist rückläufig, und das Durchschnittsalter unserer Landwirte steigt – gerade deshalb ist es wichtig, dass wir in der GAP keine weiteren Kürzungen vornehmen. Wer hier etwa zugunsten von Waffenlieferungen, NGO-Zuschüssen oder grünen Subventionsexzessen die Landwirtschaft opfern will, der muss hier im Parlament Gegenwind bekommen. Und dieser Gegenwind muss stark sein, und dieser Gegenwind muss laut sein!

    Landwirte sind keine Befehlsempfänger links-grüner Fantasieprojekte. Landwirte sind auch keine Bittsteller für ein paar kleine Zuschüsse. Im totalen Gegensatz zu ihren NGOs und fragwürdigen Vereinen schaffen Landwirte jeden Tag Werte, die man greifen, fühlen, riechen und sogar schmecken kann. Gesunde Lebensmittel für 500 Millionen EU-Bürger gibt es nämlich nur mit Landwirten, die auch selbst von ihrer Hände Arbeit leben können.

    Immer neue Ökoauflagen, immer neue Aufnahmefantasien von großen Agrarländern wie Ukraine oder Türkei, immer neue Abkommen zum Schaden unserer Landwirte wie das Billigimporteabkommen Mercosur. Wir werden diesen Unsinn stoppen: AfD, ESN stehen fest an Ihrer Seite.

    		  
       

    		 

      Carmen Crespo Díaz (PPE). – Señora presidenta, señor comisario, señorías, hemos empezado una legislatura adecuada para la agricultura. Comenzamos claramente teniendo una estrategia para la agricultura para simplificar todas nuestras normas, para dar recursos a los agricultores —hombres y mujeres—, y no podemos torcer esa situación. No se puede torcer con un marco financiero plurianual que mezcle los fondos; no se puede torcer para descafeinar la PAC, que está sirviendo a lo largo de los años para apuntalar las zonas rurales, para dar alimentación sana a los europeos, para exportar y para crear empleo. No se puede torcer porque la seguridad alimentaria es parte de la seguridad de la Unión Europea y, por tanto, tiene que tener un reflejo especial en ese marco financiero plurianual.

    Este Parlamento tiene competencia de codecisión, establecida por el Tratado de la Unión Europea, y la tenemos que ejercer, porque yo sé de la buena voluntad del comisario —sin lugar a dudas— y espero que la tenga también el Consejo. Tenemos que adoptar una decisión que venga a traer la revolución agraria a Europa —la nueva revolución—, que permita que luchemos contra el cambio climático con la economía circular, con las inversiones que propicien nuevos nichos de empleo en las zonas rurales, que permita equilibrar el agua y dar oportunidades a las nuevas generaciones, en este caso.

    Creo que no podemos traicionar lo que hemos empezado a hacer, que es el nuevo diálogo estratégico, bien hecho por parte del comisario, de la Comisión y, además, con el respaldo de este Parlamento.

    		  
       

    		 

      Cristina Maestre (S&D). – Señora presidenta, señor comisario, yo sé que usted hace lo que puede, pero los planes de la presidenta son otros: recortes y fondo único. Si no cambia las cosas, Ursula von der Leyen va a pasar a la historia por ser la presidenta que recortó la política agrícola común e hizo pagar a los agricultores la deuda del NextGenerationEU. Esto es una injusticia, porque fue el campo el que alimentó a Europa cuando estábamos encerrados por la COVID-19, porque la política agrícola común surgió para frenar las hambrunas de la posguerra y porque no entendemos a qué viene eso de renunciar a ser la mayor potencia agroalimentaria del mundo.

    Un recorte del 15 % o 20 % dejaría fuera de juego a miles de pequeños agricultores; también dejaría muchas zonas rurales sin inversiones, sin oportunidades y sin futuro. La propuesta de marco único, además de diluir la política agrícola común, rompe el mercado único: es un tremendo error económico, territorial y político. Para colmo, pretenden presentar esta reforma sin esperar la visión del Parlamento, es decir, de espaldas a los ciudadanos europeos.

    Los motores de los tractores empiezan a sonar de nuevo ahí fuera, señor comisario, y esta vez ya no confiarán en su palabra. Por favor, quítense esa idea de la cabeza.

    		  
       

    		 

      Mathilde Androuët (PfE). – Madame la Présidente, en tant que rapporteure pour avis de la commission de l’environnement sur la future PAC, je me réjouis d’avoir pu faire voter la fin de cette concurrence malsaine entre le monde agricole et celui de la défense de notre environnement. Pour nous, la ligne est claire: défendre nos agriculteurs, nos éleveurs, nos terroirs, et garantir leur avenir face à une concurrence étrangère qui piétine nos règles et nos traditions agricoles uniques et plus vertueuses.

    Bien que l’opinion change, y compris au sein de cet hémicycle, la Commission européenne s’apprête à faire passer en force l’accord avec le Mercosur, qui menace directement notre souveraineté agricole et sacrifie la qualité de notre production. Nous nous battons contre ce traité et, au minimum, pour l’inscription des clauses miroirs, et défendons cette simple mesure de bon sens: nos paysans d’abord, avant les cargaisons de viande sud-américaines, qui cassent les prix, dégradent la qualité et détruisent nos emplois locaux. Sans cela, pas de souveraineté alimentaire, laquelle est l’objectif initial de la PAC.

    Je le répète ici haut et fort: pas de PAC crédible sans frontières protégées! Pas de PAC ambitieuse sans remettre nos agriculteurs, notamment les jeunes, au centre! Avec le Rassemblement national, nous combattrons jusqu’au bout contre cet accord avec le Mercosur et contre tous les accords qui trahissent nos paysans et menacent de les faire disparaître.

    		  
       

    		 

      Arash Saeidi (The Left). – Madame la Présidente, monsieur le Commissaire, vous me trouverez toujours à vos côtés lorsqu’il s’agira de défendre un budget ambitieux pour la politique agricole commune, un soutien public qui s’applique aux deux piliers de la PAC – le revenu et le développement durable – afin de garantir un revenu digne à nos agriculteurs et d’assurer notre souveraineté alimentaire.

    Toutefois, ce soutien doit cesser de nourrir l’injustice. Aujourd’hui, 80 % des aides vont à 20 % des exploitations. Ce modèle favorise l’agrandissement sans fin, l’endettement, l’intensification. Il pousse à bout celles et ceux qui travaillent la terre. Nous voulons donc la fin des aides à l’hectare et une PAC équitable. L’argent public ne doit plus récompenser la taille, mais, comme vous l’avez dit, les agriculteurs actifs. Nous voulons un plafonnement strict des aides, un soutien ciblé aux petites et aux moyennes exploitations, une réforme agraire pour permettre l’installation de nouveaux paysans et une caisse de défaisance pour sortir de l’endettement ceux qui veulent changer de modèle. Nous demandons aussi des prix planchers garantis. Enfin, nous refusons que la PAC serve de variable d’ajustement à des accords de libre-échange potentiellement mortels pour notre agriculture, comme celui impliquant le Mercosur. On ne peut pas prôner de normes strictes ici et importer de la viande issue de la déforestation, d’élevages en batterie et du dumping aussi bien social que chimique.

    Monsieur le Commissaire, nous voulons des moyens pour une PAC juste et vertueuse.

    		  
       

    		 

      Sarah Knafo (ESN). – Madame la Présidente, chers collègues, à chaque réforme de la PAC, de nouveaux mots, de nouveaux sigles, plus de paperasse, plus de normes, et moins de revenus pour les agriculteurs. Nos agriculteurs sont des acteurs stratégiques essentiels, plus précieux que tous les minerais et que toutes les voitures contre lesquels vous les sacrifiez. Ces travailleurs de la terre magnifiques, vous les négligez. Pis, vous les maltraitez: à coups de normes, et en leur imposant une concurrence déloyale, comme vous vous apprêtez encore à le faire par le biais du traité avec le Mercosur. Vous interdisez le traitement des betteraves sucrières, mais vous allez lever les droits de douane pour importer 16 millions de tonnes de sucre. Vous assommez les éleveurs de normes qui n’existent nulle part ailleurs dans le monde – sur la taille de leurs étables, leur éclairage et leur ventilation, sur le passeport de leurs vaches et le temps qu’elles passent dans les prés –, et vous allez lever les droits de douane sur 99 000 tonnes de bœuf!

    Dans une semaine, les travaux parlementaires s’arrêtent pour les vacances. Vous allez prendre un repos que vous estimez bien mérité. Les agriculteurs, eux, ne partiront pas à la plage. Leur été, ce sera les moissons, les foins, déchaumer, labourer, semer, apporter de l’eau aux vaches et, bien sûr, remplir la paperasse que les bureaucrates éplucheront à la rentrée.

    Sans la politique agricole commune il n’y aurait pas eu d’Union européenne, et sans les agriculteurs il n’y aura plus d’Europe. Pour les aider, libérons-les!

    		  
       

    		 

      Katarína Roth Neveďalová (NI). – Vážená pani predsedajúca, poľnohospodárstvo je dnes naozaj veľmi inovatívny priestor. Máme nové technológie, máme satelitnú navigáciu a máme rôzne veci, ktoré sa využívajú v poľnohospodárstve. Ja sama som veľmi rada, že veľa mladých ľudí stále chce robiť poľnohospodárstvo. Môj brat si nedávno urobil vodičský preukaz na traktor, pretože sám vidí napríklad práve toto ako príležitosť. Ale aby sme tých mladých ľudí a tých ľudí v poľnohospodárstve zachovali, tak potrebujeme určite zachovať finančnú podporu pre poľnohospodársku politiku aj v Európskej únii. Ja som veľmi rada, pán komisár, že ste povedali, že poľnohospodárska politika bude mať dôležitú a kľúčovú úlohu pre Európsku úniu aj v nasledujúcom rozpočte.

    Ale dôležité je takisto, ako povedalo viacero kolegov predo mnou, aby sme zachovali aj finančnú podporu. Nielen hovorili o nejakom, možno o nejakých nových prioritách, ale takisto aj o tom, aby financie do poľnohospodárstva stále išli. Určite v tejto súvislosti treba hovoriť o dorovnaní priamych platieb a o ich zachovaní, pretože krajiny ako moja – Slovenská republika – po dvadsiatich rokoch členstva v Európskej únii sme stále na 85 % oproti západoeurópskym krajinám, čo sa týka napríklad priamych platieb. Pri medzinárodných zmluvách, ktoré uzatvárame s ďalšími krajinami, takisto musíme dbať na podporu poľnohospodárstva. Ja som veľmi zvedavá, ako dopadne nová zmluva s Ukrajinou, ktorá je podľa môjho názoru dosť nevýhodná. A naozaj, kvóty, ktoré ponúkame Ukrajine, sú oveľa vyššie, ako by bolo vhodné.

    		  
       

    		 

      Siegfried Mureşan (PPE). – Madam President, dear colleagues, the common agricultural policy is one of the core competences, the core responsibilities of the European Union. Through our implication in that area, through our support of farmers, we are guaranteeing millions of jobs in Europe in the agriculture sector. We are guaranteeing rural development, which goes way beyond agriculture, and we are guaranteeing food security and high consumer protection. Our food standards, our quality standards here in the European Union are better than anywhere else in the world.

    Let me say very clearly, in times of multiple security risks that we are facing from autocrats around the world, there cannot be national security without food security. Food security is now more important than ever.

    Farmers have faced difficult recent years. They made more efforts. They faced more pressure. They are doing more to protect the environment. They are the first victims, very often, of extreme weather conditions. They are facing price volatility. They are facing high inflation and they are also facing a shortage of labour force. We are asking more from them, so we have a duty to do more for them as well. It is in our fundamental interest. It is in the fundamental interest of the people, no matter what sector they are involved in.

    This is why this European Parliament has a clear position, Commissioner, particularly now with the beginning of the negotiations on the next seven‑year budget. We want to preserve the identity of the common agricultural policy. People in Europe – farmers, specifically – should know exactly that support will be coming in the next seven years as well so that they can plan their investment.

    So our demands are clear: the common agricultural policy should remain as a distinct policy with a separate budget, which is easily identifiable with the two pillars. We want a separate legal base, and in financial terms, the support for farmers should be at least the same as it was now, adjusted to inflation. The Parliament is united behind this position.

    		  
       

    		 

      André Rodrigues (S&D). – Senhora Presidente, Senhor Comissário, corremos o risco de ter uma PAC que é pouco mais do que uma sigla. Desfigurá‑la, reduzir‑lhe o orçamento ou transformá‑la num fundo nacional é pôr em causa o rendimento de milhões de produtores e suas famílias, a nossa segurança alimentar e a coesão territorial.

    A PAC pós‑2027 tem de respeitar quem trabalha a terra, tem de contar com um orçamento justo e estável, indexado à inflação, para que os apoios não se tornem cortes disfarçados.

    Uma PAC digna deste nome não pode suportar sozinha o peso da transição justa, nem deixar de apoiar os produtores quando tudo perdem em função das alterações climáticas.

    Uma PAC digna desse nome tem de proteger os pequenos e médios agricultores, garantir a renovação geracional e reforçar programas como o POSEI, essencial para regiões como os Açores.

    A Comissão não se deve iludir, nem deve iludir os outros. Menos regras, com menos apoios, tem apenas um nome: desresponsabilização.

    A História dirá quem defendeu a PAC e quem a abandonou.

    		  
       

    		 

      Mireia Borrás Pabón (PfE). – Señora presidenta, señor comisario, señorías, ¿cuál fue la primera gran lección que nos dejó la pandemia? Que sin agricultores no hay comida, y sin comida no hay Europa. Y allí estuvieron ellos, nuestros agricultores, los primeros, cuando más los necesitábamos. Y hoy, cinco años después, esta Comisión les da las gracias con un tijeretazo histórico a la PAC. ¿La excusa? Los 30 000 millones de euros que tenemos que pagar en intereses de unos fondos europeos despilfarrados. Y claro, Von der Leyen aprieta el cinturón, pero ¡qué casualidad que siempre al cuello del campo!

    Y mientras todos ustedes aquí asienten, hay una fuerza política en este hemiciclo que no se arrodilla ante burócratas ni ante lobbies ecologistas. Aquí hay un bastión que va a dar la batalla por cada ganadero y por cada agricultor de Europa, porque desde VOX y Patriotas por Europa vamos a seguir defendiendo una PAC digna, una PAC con un presupuesto fuerte que, por lo menos, se ajuste a la inflación. Una PAC libre, sin imposiciones ideológicas, como el Pacto Verde Europeo. Una PAC útil, ágil, productiva y justa, y, sobre todo, una PAC leal con quienes alimentan a Europa, porque ustedes dicen aquí todos los días que el futuro será verde o no será. Yo les digo que el futuro será con ellos o no será.

    (La oradora acepta responder a una pregunta formulada con arreglo al procedimiento de la «tarjeta azul»)

    		  
       

    		 

      Mireia Borrás Pabón (PfE), respuesta de «tarjeta azul». – Señoría, creo que la respuesta a esa pregunta es evidente: he visto vacas en muchísimas ocasiones, en persona, he visitado un montón de granjas cada semana. Le puedo decir que visito granjas, explotaciones agrarias, ganaderas, etcétera. Los que parece que no han visto una vaca en su vida ni han visitado una explotación agraria son todos ustedes, que legislan a espaldas del campo, que legislan sin hablar con el campo, que legislan totalmente de espaldas a nuestros agricultores y ganaderos, porque si lo hicieran, no aplicarían legislaciones como la del Pacto Verde Europeo y todas esas legislaciones. Solamente hace falta que ustedes salgan a la calle para ver cómo están cada día los tractores en la calle denunciando las políticas que hacen ustedes aquí en sus despachos…

    (la presidenta retira la palabra a la oradora)

    		  
       

    		 

      Asger Christensen (Renew). – Fru Formand! Vi skal sikre, at EU’s landbrugspolitik i fremtiden også er fælles. Den fælles landbrugspolitik skal forblive som EU-finansiering. Det skaber lige konkurrencevilkår, og det beskytter det indre marked og forhindrer renationalisering. Vi skal sikre en realistisk grøn omstilling, hvor klima og miljø går hånd i hånd med fødevareproduktion og konkurrenceevne. Og så skal vi sikre, at ny teknologi bliver gangbar for alle landmænd. Budget er fortsat nødvendigt især for unge og aktive landmænd. Vi skal bevæge os mod flere resultatorienterede betalinger som et supplement, og vi skal huske, at fødevareforsyning er sikkerhedspolitik. Europa har brug for stabile fødevarer og forsyningskæder, ikke mindst i denne urolige verden, vi har lige nu. Derfor skal vi simplificere reglerne, så det bliver lettere at være landmand. Lige så vigtigt er det at sikre et stærkt generationsskifte, fordi uden unge er der ingen fremtid for landbruget, sikker adgang til jord og kapital og fremtidstro. Vi skal huske, hvem vi arbejder for. Landmanden med støvlerne på, forbrugeren med indkøbsvognen og fremtidige generationer, som skal have et robust Europa at være i.

    		  
       

    		 

      Giuseppe Antoci (The Left). – Signora Presidente, onorevoli colleghi, mentre si discute sul futuro della PAC, nei nostri territori cresce l’allarme. Le ipotesi di tagli di 80 miliardi alla PAC, con 8 miliardi in meno per l’Italia, rischiano di mettere in ginocchio il sistema agricolo. Non si può investire in armi togliendo risorse a chi lavora per garantire cibo sano, presidio di territorio e coesione sociale.

    Ci sono regioni devastate dalla siccità e dagli incendi e con riserve idriche al collasso e mentre si parla di un fondo unico, l’agricoltura scompare.

    Per questo serve un capitolo autonomo, risorse dedicate e strutturali per affrontare l’emergenza climatica, garantendo la tenuta sociale.

    C’è poi il tema della legalità: ogni euro deve essere tracciabile e protetto da truffe e infiltrazioni mafiose, con un sistema efficace, che non faccia ricadere il costo burocratico sugli agricoltori onesti.

    Difendere l’agricoltura significa difendere il lavoro e la dignità nei nostri territori. Non possiamo permetterci di perdere questo presidio.

    		  
       

    		 

      David Cormand (Verts/ALE). – Madame la Présidente, les agriculteurs européens meurent, nos fermes disparaissent, les paysans croulent sous le poids des dettes, et les firmes agroalimentaires, agrochimiques, ainsi que la grande distribution exploitent leur travail. Pendant ce temps-là, la Commission européenne se prépare à les achever. Ursula von der Leyen veut non seulement fusionner les deux piliers de la PAC, mais elle veut en plus diluer celle-ci dans un budget qui va tuer la spécificité du budget européen de l’agriculture.

    Pourtant, cela ne suffit pas: avec le PPE, elle intrigue pour passer en force le traité de libre-échange avec le Mercosur. Au nom des Verts, je dis: «Ça suffit!». Il faut enfin une PAC qui assure des aides mieux réparties, qui rémunère les services rendus à la nature et qui encourage les pratiques vertueuses. Il faut casser les monopoles des mastodontes industriels de l’agro-alimentaire, qui étranglent les paysans en leur imposant des prix qui les spolient de leur travail. Il faut enfin une Europe qui garantisse aux agricultrices et aux agriculteurs une chose simple: leur travail doit payer.

    		  
       

    		 

      Camilla Laureti (S&D). – Signora Presidente, signor Commissario, onorevoli colleghi, se flessibilità del bilancio vuol dire meno fondi, noi diciamo no.

    Lunedì abbiamo votato la nostra relazione sulla PAC post‑2027 e il nostro no al fondo unico è stato chiaro da parte di tutti.

    Come socialisti continueremo a chiedere che i fondi dell’agricoltura arrivino a chi coltiva la terra e che accanto al sostegno per ettaro ci siano più fondi per giovani, donne, aree interne rurali e piccole aziende agricole. Abbiamo inserito anche filiere eque e misure anti‑sottocosto, benessere animale ed etichettatura trasparente.

    Al centro resta la condizionalità sociale: abbiamo fatto una visita a Borgo Mezzanone, Foggia, con 5 000 migranti sotto lo schiaffo del caporalato. La condizione ambientale anche resta una priorità, e negarla oggi – e negare la centralità della sfida climatica – è dannoso e irresponsabile.

    Al lavoro in queste direzioni ci vediamo mercoledì per la vostra proposta.

    		  
       

    		 

      Gilles Pennelle (PfE). – Madame la Présidente, la crise agricole est profonde, et elle s’aggrave. La PAC actuelle, qui a rompu avec l’esprit de 1962, en est la principale cause. Il faut donc tourner le dos à ses choix, souvent guidés par l’idéologie. Les agriculteurs ne vivront jamais de leur métier tant que vous organiserez la concurrence déloyale, comme l’illustre le funeste traité avec le Mercosur. Ils ne vivront jamais de leur métier tant que vous les étoufferez avec les règles décroissantes du pacte vert.

    Monsieur le Commissaire, nos agriculteurs vous demandent, pour la future PAC, un budget augmenté, un budget ajusté sur l’inflation, un budget sanctuarisé. Non seulement cela ne semble pas être au programme de vos choix futurs, mais votre volonté de faire rentrer l’Ukraine dans l’Union européenne promet en outre un effondrement des aides pour nos agriculteurs.

    L’Europe a besoin d’une agriculture puissante, capable d’assurer sa souveraineté alimentaire avec des produits de qualité. Nos agriculteurs nous demandent – vous demandent – de les protéger et de faire en sorte qu’ils puissent produire – tout ce que vous ne semblez pas vouloir leur assurer.

    		  
       

    		 

      Waldemar Buda (ECR). – Pani Przewodnicząca, panie Komisarzu! Wszystkie głosy osób, które wystąpiły przed przede mną, to głosy obawy, to głosy wątpliwości. Dzisiaj okazuje się, że Pan jako komisarz może być tym, który dopuści czy doprowadzi do tego wszystkiego, co poprzedni komisarz blokował, czyli do ograniczenia wspólnej polityki rolnej, do umowy z Mercosurem, liberalizacji handlu z Ukrainą. Czy Pan chce się zapisać w historii jako ten komisarz, który do tego doprowadził i na to się zgodził?

    Dzisiaj mamy głosy protestu i sprzeciwu. Wyraźmy więc ten sprzeciw, doprowadźmy w tym kluczowym momencie Komisję Europejską do realnego działania. Wszyscy mamy wątpliwości, w którym kierunku to idzie. Za chwilkę, w przyszłym tygodniu i w kolejnym, będą podejmowane bardzo ważne decyzje. Jeżeli Państwo nie są przeciwko, niech się Państwo wstrzymają z poparciem dla Komisji Europejskiej Ursuli von der Leyen. Niech się wezmą do roboty. Niech to będzie dla nich sygnał ostrzegawczy.

    Czy Pan naprawdę nie rozumie, że sprowadzanie żywności z całego świata nie jest rozwiązaniem dla Europy? Dzisiaj będzie tanio i wspaniale, ale za chwilę tej żywności po prostu może braknąć. Ona po prostu może nie przypłynąć do Europy, bo będzie jakiś konflikt, który do tego doprowadzi. Czy COVID nas niczego nie nauczył? Czy wojny na świecie nas niczego nie nauczyły? Dzisiaj chcemy handlować z Brazylią? Szanowni Państwo, to nie jest żadne rozwiązanie. Więc dzisiaj pokazujemy żółtą kartkę Ursuli von der Leyen. Doprowadźmy do tego, żeby dzisiaj były ambicje Unii Europejskiej, Komisji Europejskiej, a nie płynięcie i myślenie tak jak 20 lat temu. Świat się zmienił i Unia Europejska też powinna się zmieniać.

    		  
       

    		 

      Christine Singer (Renew). – Frau Präsidentin, Herr Kommissar! Die nächste Gemeinsame Agrarpolitik muss eines leisten: die Vielfalt unserer Betriebe erhalten. Europas Stärke liegt in seinen unterschiedlichen Regionen, und genau dort, auf unseren Höfen, entsteht Ernährungssicherheit – Tag für Tag und Generation für Generation. Ernährungssicherheit bedeutet Unabhängigkeit – Punkt.

    Und wenn wir das ernst meinen, dürfen wir keine Region, keinen Betrieb und keinen Standort aufgeben – vom Ackerbau bis zum Grünland und von der Gunstregion bis ins benachteiligte Gebiet. Ein besonderes Augenmerk müssen wir auch auf die Tierhaltung legen. Die Landwirtschaft muss überall möglich bleiben. Gerade Grünlandregionen leisten Enormes für Klima, für Humusaufbau, Biodiversität und für die Eiweißversorgung. Und doch fallen viele dieser Standorte durch das Förderraster – das darf so nicht bleiben.

    Wenn wir die GAP nach 2027 nicht richtig steuern, verlieren wir genau jene Betriebe, die unsere Landwirtschaft stabil und vielfältig machen. Und wer unsere bäuerlichen Strukturen verliert, verliert mehr als nur Lebensmittel: Er verliert Rückhalt, Resilienz und Realitätssinn.

    (Die Rednerin ist damit einverstanden, auf eine Frage nach dem Verfahren der „blauen Karte“ zu antworten.)

    		  
       

    		 

      Cristina Guarda (Verts/ALE). – Signora Presidente, onorevoli colleghi, la siccità ci sta mettendo in difficoltà, ci sta presentando il conto: 50 miliardi solo nel 2022, 5 milioni di lavoratori agricoli in ginocchio per la mancanza di acqua. I raccolti sono crollati, i suoli si stanno degradando, la perdita di biodiversità accelera: questa è la normalità climatica in Europa, di cui voi siete complici, oggi.

    Chi lavora la terra, prendendosene veramente cura, non viene valorizzato, non viene riconosciuto. Un suolo vivo che trattiene acqua, biodiversità necessaria per produrre cibo, che è bene comune: questo è quello che fanno loro, questi sono gli agricoltori, veri custodi del nostro futuro. E come tali devono essere sostenuti.

    A breve scopriremo la strategia della politica agricola comune del futuro. Servono strumenti concreti, stabili e accessibili, e questa strategia ha un nome: agroecologia. Commissario, smettiamo di rincorrere gli interessi di chi non vuole cambiare e costruiamo finalmente una politica agricola che protegge chi ci protegge.

    		  
       

    		 

      Konstantinos Arvanitis (The Left). – Κυρία Πρόεδρε, κύριε Επίτροπε, είναι πάρα πολύ σημαντικό για τους αγρότες μας, για όλους τους πολίτες, ο στρατηγικός προσανατολισμός της κοινής γεωργικής πολιτικής. Για τη διανομή των ευρωπαϊκών πόρων, δεν θα πρότεινα στον κύριο Weber και σε εσάς, κύριε Επίτροπε, να ζητήσετε το software της ευσυνειδησίας του κυρίου Μητσοτάκη από την Ελλάδα.

    Η ΚΓΠ είναι το βασικό μας εργαλείο χρηματοδότησης στην παραγωγή τροφίμων. Aλλά για μας, τις Ελληνίδες και τους Έλληνες, τους Ευρωπαίους πολίτες του Νότου, είναι καθοριστικός παράγοντας για την αντιμετώπιση του δημογραφικού προβλήματος. Τι κοινή γεωργική πολιτική θέλουμε; Πρέπει να διατηρηθεί ξεχωριστή η διακριτή γραμμή του προϋπολογισμού της ΚΓΠ για να αποτραπεί οποιαδήποτε μείωση του προϋπολογισμού. Χρειάζεται ανακατεύθυνση των πόρων και των πολιτικών της Ένωσης που να συνδέονται με την παραγωγή και να την ενθαρρύνουν χωρίς να αφαιρούν πόρους για εξοπλιστικές δαπάνες.

    Ιδιαίτερη μέριμνα στην ενίσχυση των ορεινών, μειονεκτικών, νησιωτικών περιοχών και των ποιοτικών προϊόντων. Ενίσχυση των παραδοσιακών μεθόδων καλλιέργειας, φιλικές προς το περιβάλλον, καθώς και την παράκτια αλιεία. Είμαστε φυσικά κατά της συμφωνίας Mercosur και, βεβαίως, αυτό το απαράδεκτο πραξικόπημα της κυρίας von der Leyen, που δεν πήρε την έγκριση του Ευρωπαϊκού Κοινοβουλίου. Σας έχουμε προτείνει δημιουργία ταμείου για την προσαρμογή της γεωργίας στην κλιματική κρίση με πόρους εκτός ΚΓΠ. Αυτές είναι οι προτάσεις της Αριστεράς.

    		  
       

    		 

      Daniel Buda (PPE). – Doamnă președintă, domnule comisar, bugetul Politicii Agricole Comune trebuie să rămână separat, nicidecum diluat în alte politici și, cu atât mai puțin, nu poate fi redus.

    A te atinge astăzi de bugetul PAC înseamnă a slăbi coloana vertebrală a Uniunii Europene. Această politică nu este despre subvenții. Este despre hrană, siguranță și viitorul satelor europene. Iar azi, aceste sate mor încet. 800 de ferme dispar în fiecare zi, punând în pericol securitatea noastră alimentară. Tinerii fermieri nu mai cred azi în noi.

    Dacă vom reduce bugetul, vom accelera abandonul agriculturii europene, satele noastre devenind muzee în aer liber, iar noi vom importa alimente pline de pesticide din țările terțe.

    Vă cer așadar astăzi, ferm, domnule comisar, și fără echivoc, ca bugetul PAC să rămână separat, cu o finanțare adecvată și garantată post-2027. Este o linie roșie, iar cine trece această linie își asumă începutul destrămării Uniunii Europene.

    		  
       

    		 

      Vytenis Povilas Andriukaitis (S&D). – Gerbiama Pirmininke, komisijos nary, be galo dėkui už gerą vizitą Lietuvoj ir puikų dialogą su ūkininkais. Aš paliudijo, kad ir ūkininkai, ir jūs esate už tai, kad žemės ūkis būtų progresyvus, tvarus, produktyvus, teisingas, atsparus ir perspektyvus. Ačiū už visas iniciatyvas, bet mums reikia atskiro biudžeto. Bet koks biudžeto fragmentavimas susilpnintų Europos Sąjungos žemės ūkio politiką, bet koks. Mums reikia didesnio biudžeto. Čia teisingai kalbėjo apie ūkininkus, į kuriuos nekreipiame… didesnio biudžeto. Čia mūsų visų užduotis turėti didesnį MFF, nes tai padėtų apsaugoti konkurencingumą, tvarumą. Kaimui reikia taip pat investicijų į infrastruktūrą, bet ir jaunimo reikia. Reikia patvaraus ūkininkavimo, daugiau inovacijų, daugiau pažangių idėjų, kad jaunimas užsidegtų būti ūkininkais. Ir tiesioginės išmokos, tiesioginių išmokų suvienodinimas yra senas pažadas. Komisare, turime tai padaryti, nes tai yra socialinio teisingumo reikalas visoje Europos Sąjungoje, solidarios Europos reikalas.

    		  
       

    		 

      Valérie Deloge (PfE). – Madame la Présidente, monsieur le Commissaire, la PAC est un ADN, la PAC est un esprit. Son ADN, c’est celui des premières nations européennes, qui ont bâti un espace de paix pour leurs peuples. Son esprit, c’est l’esprit PAC. Depuis 1962, cet esprit accompagne nos agriculteurs au rythme de leur développement avec une mission principale: leur garantir un niveau de vie équitable et nourrir notre population, afin de ne pas dépendre de pays tiers.

    La Commission européenne fait aujourd’hui le choix de ne pas augmenter substantiellement le budget de la PAC. Ce choix, c’est bafouer l’esprit de la PAC. Pis encore: ne pas augmenter substantiellement ce budget tout en finançant les concurrents directs de nos agriculteurs, comme l’illustre cette enveloppe de 15 millions d’euros allouée la semaine dernière aux vignobles d’Afrique du Sud, c’est piétiner l’esprit même de la PAC.

    Les Français le savent bien: un budget révèle une politique. Vous leur révélez donc que votre politique agricole n’est pas celle du sursaut, mais bien celle du surplace.

    		  
       

    		 

      Martin Häusling (Verts/ALE). – Frau Präsidentin, liebe Kolleginnen und Kollegen! Wir müssen das Geld besser ausgeben. Was machten wir denn in den letzten Jahren? Wir haben Landbesitz gefördert. Je mehr Landbesitz, desto mehr Geld. Nein, wir müssen die Landwirte fördern, die was für Umwelt, für Klima tun, für Biodiversität. Da muss das Geld hingehen. Ich glaube, da sind wir uns einig: Wir brauchen eine starke zweite Säule. Wir brauchen eine ländliche Entwicklung. Wir müssen für einen Erhalt der Infrastruktur im ländlichen Raum sorgen. Dazu gehören auch Bäcker, Handwerk, und dazu gehört auch ein gutes Internet. Wir brauchen eine stärkere Förderung von jungen Landwirten, auch von Quereinsteigern. Was brauchen die? Die brauchen Kapital, die brauchen Zugang zu Land, und vor allem Förderung von benachteiligten Regionen. Das muss ein Kernanliegen europäischer Agrarpolitik sein. Darauf müssen wir zusammen hinarbeiten.

    Was wir nicht fördern müssen, ist eine intensive Tierhaltung. Was wir auch nicht brauchen, ist eine Landwirtschaft, die auf Gentechnik basiert – ohne Kennzeichnung –und wir brauchen auch keine Patente auf Gentechnik. Das macht keinen Sinn für die Zukunft. Lieber Herr Kommissar, hören Sie nicht nur auf den Bauernverband, hören Sie auf die Ergebnisse des strategischen Dialogs. Dann kommen wir vorwärts und nicht rückwärts.

    		  
       

    		 

      Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral (PPE). – Senhora Presidente, Senhor Comissário, não há nada mais importante para a segurança e defesa do que colocar comida na mesa dos europeus sem depender de terceiros e quem o faz são os nossos agricultores, tantas vezes maltratados e mal‑amados. É por isso que é tão importante a mensagem positiva que o senhor comissário tem passado da agricultura e do mundo rural.

    A PAC tem de voltar à sua origem, com foco na produção sustentável de alimentos, e todos os restantes serviços que os agricultores prestam devem ser remunerados por outras vias, com incentivos em vez de obrigações. Tem de manter a sua estrutura com um orçamento robusto e recordo que os Estados‑Membros apenas contribuem com 0,36 % do seu PIB para este desígnio maior e tem de ficar de fora de qualquer fundo único. A atração de mais pessoas para o setor tem de ser uma prioridade e conseguimos isto com investigação, inovação e digitalização. E é fundamental termos um seguro europeu.

    E termino com o POSEI, para as regiões ultraperiféricas, que já tem uma depreciação superior a 40 % por não ser atualizado há cerca de 20 anos. O seu aumento é corrigir uma injustiça também para com os agricultores dos Açores.

    Contamos consigo, Senhor Comissário.

    		  
       

    		 

      Maria Grapini (S&D). – Doamnă președintă, domnule comisar, stimați colegi, Politica Agricolă Comună după 2027 trebuie să fie în primul rând o politică a echității, a responsabilității față de toți fermierii europeni.

    Vă mulțumesc, domnule comisar, pentru discuțiile pe care le-am purtat și sper să veniți în țara mea, în România, să discutați direct cu fermierii, pentru că iată ce vor fermierii. Eu îi reprezint astăzi pe ei, nu ideile mele. În primul rând, există un tratament inegal, așa cum am spus. Și aceste dezechilibre între zone, est, vest, nord, sud, fac să scadă încrederea în proiectul european, să scadă nu numai veniturile fermierilor, dar și coeziunea în Uniunea Europeană.

    Cred, domnule comisar, că s-a înțeles foarte clar că o linie roșie este să avem buget separat pentru Politica Agricolă Comună, să avem bugete pentru susținerea tinerilor fermieri, pentru că avem generații îmbătrânite, să avem susținerea fermierilor mici cu instrumente financiare directe, evident, să scădem și birocrația.

    Și cred, domnule comisar, că avem nevoie să construim o agricultură europeană puternică, viabilă și unită. Dar pentru asta trebuie să punem în centru fermierii, trebuie să-i ascultăm pe ei. Ei știu ce soluții sunt mai bune.

    		  
       

    		 

      Ton Diepeveen (PfE). – Voorzitter, commissaris, collega’s, de Europese landbouw zit klem. De Green Deal heeft de sector op slot gezet. En wat boeren nodig hebben is niet méér ideologie, maar ruimte voor voedselzekerheid, verdienvermogen en de vrijheid om te boeren.

    Het idee van één groot landbouwfonds met meer centralisatie is geen oplossing. Wat nodig is, is het terugdringen van de overregulering die innovatie blokkeert en ondernemerschap verstikt. Innovatie, dat is de sleutel, ook binnen de landbouw. Of het nu gaat om renure, precisielandbouw en NGT’s of om technieken die nog ontwikkeld moeten worden, we moeten ruimte geven. We moeten niet gaan remmen. Ik reken op de Commissie om bestaande wetgeving snel aan te passen, zodat innovatie mogelijk wordt, vandaag en morgen.

    Wat boeren nodig hebben is geen politieke labyrint, maar een duidelijk en werkbaar regelgevend kader. Alleen als we deze wijzigingen doorvoeren, versterken we hun concurrentiekracht, want zonder een duidelijk toekomstperspectief komt er geen nieuwe generatie boeren. Ik wens u succes, commissaris.

    		  
       

    		 

      Jacek Ozdoba (ECR). – Pani Przewodnicząca, panie Komisarzu! Będzie Pan grabarzem rolnictwa europejskiego. Ręce precz od polskiego rolnika. Ręce precz od wszystkich rolników Unii Europejskiej. Wasz pomysł w postaci Mercosur doprowadzi do tego, że was po prostu ludzie na taczkach wywiozą. W imię jakiegoś biznesu, który będzie musiał być wyjaśniony, być może komisja śledcza będzie tu najlepszym przedmiotem do tego, aby podjąć tą dyskusję kiedyś, chcecie zabić europejskie rolnictwo. Więc jeszcze raz podkreślę – zostawcie europejskie rolnictwo w spokoju.

    A jeżeli ktoś uważa inaczej, to za dwie godziny macie głosowanie nad Ursulą von der Leyen, wstrzymajcie się chociaż. Ale jeżeli popieracie Mercosur, Zielony Ład, kryzys migracyjny, kryzys ze Stanami Zjednoczonymi, to zagłosujecie za tym, żeby pozostała na stanowisku. A jeżeli chcecie to wszystko wyrzucić do kosza, czyli chcecie Europy, która stawia na rację stanu Europy narodów, zagłosujecie za tym, żeby opuściła budynek Komisji Europejskiej.

    		  
       

    		 

      Ciaran Mullooly (Renew). – Madam President, Mr Commissioner, when we speak about the future of agriculture, some suggest only viable professional farmers should receive EU funding.

    But I cannot agree, because in 2023 only 27 % of Irish farmers met that definition. I say so because I reject that approach, because that’s where I’m from. I’m from the centre of a country where arable farmland shares the landscape with peat land, which cannot be farmed. So part-time farmers are a part of the landscape, that is the way it is. We have both an opportunity and a responsibility to secure their future, because when my late brother farmed that land, he also prepared cattle for the factory, he also was part of the food chain, he played his part.

    The CAP budget must be stabilised. We must look at this issue of investment with the same urgency as we do with the EU defence budget. I say we must return to the core purpose of CAP: supporting sustainable food production for consumers. Food security also means generational renewal, and I know you will deliver on this, but I say it to you: new entrants and retiring farmers need strong, targeted incentives at both EU and national level, and I say specifically a CAP package for new entrants that includes at least the minimum, industrial wage so they will stay on the farm.

    		  
       

    		 

      Péter Magyar (PPE). – Tisztelt Elnök Asszony! Biztos Úr! A Tisza csak olyan bizottsági javaslatot tud támogatni, amely hozzájárul a magyar mezőgazdaság fejlődéséhez és fenntarthatóságához. Csak olyan javaslatot tudunk elfogadni, amely segíti a magyar termelőket és gazdákat, és hozzájárul ahhoz, hogy a magyar emberek asztalára egészséges és megfizethető élelmiszer kerüljön, és egyben a gazdáknak tisztes megélhetést nyújtson. Elvárjuk, hogy az Unió védje meg a magyar termelőket a külföldről beáramló, sokszor rossz minőségű és szennyezett termékektől. A Tisza-kormány az Orbán-kormánnyal ellentétben mindent meg fog azért tenni, hogy az elavult hűbéres típusú mezőgazdaság helyett egy XXI. századi agrárium alakuljon ki Magyarországon.

    A vidék és a kisgazdák pártjaként nem hagyjuk, hogy Orbánék végképp elsorvasszák az egykor volt világszínvonalú magyar mezőgazdaságot, amely ma csak évtizedek óta nem látott állategészségügyi járványokat, és az elmaradt öntözési beruházásoknak köszönhetően aszálykárokat kap a nyakába, és láthatóan lehúzza az egyébként is gyengélkedő magyar gazdaságot. A Tisza csak olyan javaslatot tud támogatni, amelyben továbbra is megjelenik egy önálló mezőgazdasági alap, és fenntartja a területalapú támogatási rendszert, és amelyből elegendő forrás jut a mezőgazdaság fenntarthatóvá és versenyképessé… (az elnök megvonja a szót a felszólalótól)

    		  
       

    		 

      Michal Wiezik (Renew). – Vážená pani predsedajúca, vítam vaše návrhy. Páči sa mi podpora mladých, malých, stredných farmárov, podpora rozvoja vidieka a zatraktívnenie farmárčenia. Nastavenie férových cien a pravidiel s tretími krajinami. No obávam sa, že to nemusí stačiť.

    Žime, prosím, v reálnom svete. V takom svete v roku 2027 bude klimatická kríza horšia, ako je dnes. Budeme čeliť väčším suchám, väčším záplavám, väčším výpadkom komodít a vstupov a potrebujeme sa na to dôsledne pripraviť. No nerobíme to, nerobíme to dostatočne, práve naopak. Uvoľňujeme zelené opatrenia na ochranu pôdy, biodiverzity, zachovávame status quo, nepodporujeme nové udržateľné postupy. Z nevyhnutných opatrení robíme dobrovoľné, a tým ich oslabujeme. Je to škodlivé a nebezpečné.

    A ešte jedna vec. Benevolentné pravidlá a dôvera boli často zneužívané na rozkrádanie dotácií. Slovensko s tým má, žiaľ, veľmi zlé skúsenosti. Preto mám obavy, aby sa ďalšie uvoľňovanie pravidiel nezvrhlo na novú vlnu rozkrádania a neefektívneho prejedania európskych verejných zdrojov. Žime, prosím, v reálnom svete.

    		  
       

    		 

      Jessika Van Leeuwen (PPE). – Madam President, Commissioner, the current form of the common agricultural policy was started by Sicco Mansholt, a Dutch visionary that reformed agriculture in Europe. And now we are at a crossroad for agriculture in Europe again.

    On Monday evening, with the vote in the AGRI Committee, we sent a very strong signal to you, Commissioner. A clear signal for an independent, separate agricultural policy and the responsibility of the AGRI Committee for simplification and reduction of bureaucracy, for strengthening agriculture as a strategic sector, for food security, for empowering farmers within the supply chain, for ensuring future for our young farmers – because those were the reasons that farmers took to the streets and we have taken their concerns very seriously. We listened to them, we stood up for them. But this is all now at stake. Losing a separate CAP budget threatens the survival of thousands of European family farms and puts European food sovereignty at risk.

    So, Commissioner, you are our only hope. Don’t let this happen. CAP is the very heart of the European Union. So let’s reform Europe together.

    		  
       

    		 

      Csaba Dömötör (PfE). – Tisztelt Elnök Asszony! Hansen biztos úr kedvenc kifejezésével élve, van egy elefánt a szobában. Eléggé nagy. Az a kérdés, hogy tényleg csökkenteni akarják-e az agrártámogatásokat. Brutális terveket hallunk. A Politico azt írja, hogy 20 százalékos vágásra készülnek. Na de miért? Azért, hogy helyet csináljanak az ukrán bővítés költségeinek és a korábban felvett hitelek törlesztőrészleteinek, amelyeket félreszámoltak. Hiába használnak szépen csengő kifejezéseket: célzott támogatások, fairness – mindannyian tudjuk, hogy ez mit jelent. Azt, hogy nem mindenki kap majd támogatást azok közül, akik most kapnak. A területalapú támogatások vannak célkeresztben.

    Önök is tudják, hogy ebből nagy balhé lesz. Nem véletlen, hogy csak az ülésszak vége után mernek előjönni a konkrét javaslatokkal, hogy ne lehessen róluk itt vitatkozni. De én a közzététel előtt megkérdezem biztos úrtól, igaz-e, hogy brutális vágást terveznek az agrártámogatásokban? Hogyha igen, akkor mekkorát? Konkrét válaszát előre is köszönöm!

    		  
       

    		 

      Céline Imart (PPE). – Madame la Présidente, monsieur le Commissaire, la PAC, ce sont les racines et les ailes de l’Europe. Soixante ans après ses débuts, elle reste plus stratégique que jamais, à l’heure où l’arme alimentaire est utilisée comme un hochet par les puissances de ce monde. L’agriculture est un pilier, pas une ligne d’ajustement d’un tableau Excel, et le budget qui lui est consacré ne survivrait pas à une baisse de 15 points. Une fusion dans le fonds unique mettrait le soutien à l’agriculture en concurrence avec le soutien à la construction de ronds-points.

    Monsieur le Commissaire, vous êtes un allié sincère du monde agricole. Vous l’avez prouvé en rompant avec les vieux démons du pacte vert et avec les annonces de la simplification, au printemps. Votre intelligence du terrain tranche avec la gestion verticale et déconnectée de la présidente von der Leyen, à qui vous transmettrez de ma part une piste d’économies sur les 5,4 milliards d’euros du programme LIFE. Ces financements servent une nébuleuse d’ONG qui sapent les fondements de notre agriculture en prétendant défendre l’environnement. Un exemple dans ma région, où l’une d’entre elles, qui reçoit 9 millions d’euros, s’engage dans des manifestations interdites pour se confronter aux forces de l’ordre en arborant fièrement des drapeaux palestiniens et LGBT. Cet argent serait mieux employé dans les cours de nos fermes.

    		  
       

       

    Catch-the-eye procedure

    		  
       

    		 

      Gabriel Mato (PPE). – Señora presidenta, señor comisario, todos coincidimos en un mensaje clave: sin agricultura nuestro futuro queda en entredicho y necesitamos un marco financiero adecuado.

    Si bien esto es cierto para la Europa continental, en las regiones ultraperiféricas como Canarias es una realidad más patente, si cabe. En nuestro caso, la necesidad de ser autosuficientes y de proveernos de alimentos de calidad a buen precio es imperativa. Es un objetivo que debemos lograr y que en buena medida logramos gracias al POSEI.

    Por ello es fundamental que, de cara a la revisión de este instrumento, como mínimo se actualice la ficha de financiación —que, le recuerdo, lleva estancada trece años— para poder responder a la inflación y a los aumentos de costes de producción. Necesitamos que esta partida se amplíe para responder a los desafíos.

    Creo que el camino a seguir es obvio: necesitamos una PAC fuerte, bien dotada y menos burocrática y un POSEI que permita asegurar que las regiones ultraperiféricas pueden continuar con su desarrollo rural.

    		  
       

    		 

      Ana Miranda Paz (Verts/ALE). – Senhora Presidente, Senhor Comissário, se há alguma coisa que podemos dizer da PAC dos últimos anos é que continuou a beneficiar os grandes latifundiários e deixou de lado os pequenos agricultores. É suficiente ver os dados do meu país, a Galiza. Desde 2009 fecharam 12 000 explorações agrárias. E não é estranho: aumento da burocracia, falta de flexibilidade e falta de políticas para a renovação geracional.

    Que futuro pode ter este setor quando governos, como o galego, querem instalar fábricas de celulose, como a Altri, fábricas do século passado que podem acabar com as terras agrárias mais produtivas do meu país?

    Que futuro pode ter quando esta Comissão quer assinar, a qualquer preço, um acordo com os países do Mercosul, que vai ser para os nossos agricultores uma situação ainda mais desfavorável?

    Que futuro pode ter quando parece que há uma possibilidade de que o fundo de agricultura seja reduzido para financiar o armamento?

    Menos armamentos e mais alimentos, Senhor Comissário.

    		  
       

    		 

      Nina Carberry (PPE). – Madam President, Commissioner, if you’re fighting a war, you don’t cut your defence budget. If you’re battling wildfires and drought, you don’t slash your resilience or preparedness funds. And if you’re serious about building a sustainable, secure food system, one that pays farmers fairly and protects rural life, you should not cut the Common Agricultural Policy.

    Yes, the CAP puts food on our tables, but it does so much more. Farmers are the guardians of our land. They are the first hit by climate change. They remain the foundation of our food security. The CAP is not a budget line – it’s a lifeline. It funds greener, smarter practices. It keeps families on their farms across generations.

    As I’ve said many times before, here, we need a ring-fenced CAP, we need an increased CAP, and we must invest in our young farmers. Because without them, without the next generation, there is no future.

    		  
       

    		 

      Arkadiusz Mularczyk (ECR). – Pani Przewodnicząca! Panie Komisarzu! Po 20 latach od rozszerzenia Unii Europejskiej wciąż mamy systemową nierówność między krajami Europy Centralnej – tymi, które dołączyły do Unii Europejskiej – a krajami starej Unii. Dopłaty dla rolników oraz dopłaty inwestycyjne są wciąż wyższe dla rolników starej Unii, niższe dla rolników w Europie Centralnej, chociażby w Polsce. Czas zakończyć tę systemową niesprawiedliwość.

    Drugą rzeczą, co do której wyrażamy głęboki sprzeciw, to uderzenie w rolników z centralnej Europy, zwłaszcza z Polski. Umowa, którą obecnie negocjujecie, umową Mercosur, doprowadzi do gigantycznego napływu taniej, niekontrolowanej żywności do Unii Europejskiej, podobnie jak otwarcie handlu z Ukrainą – te dwa elementy są niszczące dla rolników z Europy Centralnej. Panie Komisarzu, jeśli doprowadzicie do zniszczenia rolnictwa w Unii Europejskiej, to będzie to wasza świadoma decyzja. Dlatego Ursula von der Leyen powinna zostać odwołana.

    		  
       

       

    PRESIDENZA: PINA PICIERNO
    Vicepresidente

    		  
       

    		 

      Francisco José Millán Mon (PPE). – Señora presidenta, señor comisario, es necesario que en el próximo marco financiero plurianual tengamos una PAC sólida, con ayudas directas, en especial para los pequeños agricultores, las explotaciones familiares y las de zonas montañosas. También es importante que se mantenga el pilar del desarrollo rural, esencial para regiones como la mía, Galicia.

    Por otro lado, celebro, comisario, que nos hable de una PAC más simple y menos burocrática; desde el Partido Popular Europeo lo hemos pedido en múltiples ocasiones. Además, la PAC debe adaptarse a la realidad de la agricultura en cada territorio. Por ejemplo, el monitoreo por satélite —que evita controles in situ— puede acabar siendo contraproducente. Por ejemplo, en mi tierra, en Galicia, el minifundismo y los numerosos días nublados provocan numerosos errores de monitoreo. Esto acaba obligando a muchos agricultores a presentar alegaciones de subsanación, es decir, más burocracia.

    Y, para terminar, insisto en una PAC flexible. Por ejemplo, las islas de biodiversidad se compaginan muy mal con los minifundios y el clima de mi tierra, Galicia.

    		  
       

    		 

      Maria Walsh (PPE). – Madam President, Commissioner, in just a few days, we’ll know what the Commission’s proposal for the next CAP will look like. And I want to stress, like many colleagues here, how critical it is not to reduce our support to areas that depend on rural development funding.

    Let’s take young farmers: they’re struggling to enter farming and make a real living, yet they’re the ones that put food on our tables and will do so for decades to come. Let’s take women: despite their tremendous contribution to our rural areas, they continue to face challenges in accessing financing, land and training. And third, let’s take the leader programme: their community-led projects are essential for local development and rural employment, but they see their funds being threatened.

    I agree with what my colleague Mr Buda said earlier, without proper funding and effective incentives for them, we risk turning our rural areas into museums, and we cannot afford to leave them behind and still expect a thriving rural economy. So let’s help them. Let’s show that being risk averse is not right now. Let’s show them that we’re there for them.

    		  
       

    		 

      Stefan Köhler (PPE). – Frau Präsidentin, sehr geehrter Herr Kommissar Hansen, lieber Christophe! In weniger als einer Woche ist es so weit: Dann wirst du den Vorschlag zu der Gemeinsamen Agrarpolitik nach 2027 vorstellen. Seit dem letzten Herbst brodelt die Gerüchteküche, wie eure Pläne aussehen könnten. Unsere Bäuerinnen und Bauern stehen vor wahnsinnig großen Herausforderungen – es wurde hier schon öfters genannt –, und wir können sie damit einfach nicht alleine lassen. Deswegen möchte ich noch einmal unterstreichen, dass wir unbedingt ein eigenständiges, starkes Agrarbudget mit ausreichenden Mitteln brauchen.

    Die Landwirtschaft – und nicht die Verteidigung – ist eines der Herzstücke der EU-Politik, und wir arbeiten gut zusammen, hier für Vereinfachungen zu sorgen. Ich wurde gewählt als Bauer, um meine Stimme hier im Europäischen Parlament laut zu erheben, und ich möchte mir nicht durch eine Umstrukturierung der Agrargelder diese Stimme nehmen lassen. Ich bitte dich, dir das wirklich zu Herzen zu nehmen! Und wir haben als Landwirte schon gezeigt: Wenn wir nicht einverstanden sind, ist mit uns nicht zu spaßen.

    		  
       

    		 

      Λευτέρης Νικολάου-Αλαβάνος (NI). – Κυρία Πρόεδρε, ρουσφέτια, εξαγορά, πελατειακές σχέσεις στο σκάνδαλο του Οργανισμού Πληρωμών και Ελέγχων Κοινοτικών Ενισχύσεων, του περιβόητου ΟΠΕΚΕΠΕ, τα οποία φύτρωσαν πάνω στη σαπίλα της ευρωενωσιακής ΚΓΠ που τσακίζει τους βιοπαλαιστές αγρότες και κτηνοτρόφους. Με ευθύνη της κυβέρνησης της Νέας Δημοκρατίας, όλων των προηγούμενων που υλοποίησαν αυτή τη στρατηγική και τη συνενοχή της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης, επιδοτήθηκε η αποσύνδεση κονδυλίων από την αγροτική παραγωγή και το ζωικό κεφάλαιο.

    Φαινόμενα ανάλογων σκανδάλων υπάρχουν παντού στην Ευρωπαϊκή Ένωση. Στην Ελλάδα είναι ένα σκάνδαλο στο οποίο εμπλέκονται κυβερνητικά, πολιτικά και διοικητικά στελέχη, κυβερνητικοί συνδικαλιστές, αγροτοπατέρες, τοπικοί παράγοντες που αποσκοπούσαν να νομιμοποιήσουν στους αγρότες την αντιλαϊκή πολιτική της ΚΓΠ και των κυβερνήσεων με το αζημίωτο. Οι βιοπαλαιστές αγρότες και κτηνοτρόφοι μαζί με τον λαό διεκδικούν, μεταξύ άλλων, να διερευνηθούν οι πολιτικές και ποινικές ευθύνες για όλους τους εμπλεκόμενους, να μην φορτωθούν αυτοί ο λαός τα πρόστιμα, και να δοθούν τα κλοπιμαία στους δικαιούχους βιοπαλαιστές αγρότες που στενάζουν από την κοινή γεωργική πολιτική της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης και την αντιαγροτική πολιτική των κυβερνήσεων.

    		  
       

       

    (Fine della procedura “catch the eye”)

    		  
       

    		 

      Christophe Hansen, Member of the Commission. – Madam President, honourable Members, let me first of all start by thanking you for your thoughtful contributions, the broader lines of which I share and the entire Commission shares. I would like to particularly give thanks again to Carmen Crespo Díaz and all the people that have worked together with you to get the report done by this Monday in order to be able to take your input on board. I think it is very important, as I said, that I fully share many of the reflections voiced here, especially the call for a strong CAP able to deliver on multiple economic, social and environmental challenges.

    I quoted Sicco Mansholt at the beginning, and this has been repeated by my colleague Jessika Van Leeuwen and I think also Bert-Jan Ruissen mentioned our Treaty obligations. I think these Treaty obligations ensure food security, ensure a fair income for our farmers, but ensure as well affordable food for our consumers, and this is more important than ever.

    I think what we have to say as well is that you can’t win a war on an empty stomach, and you can’t build a continent on an empty stomach. Therefore, I believe that we are on the same idea that the identity of the common agricultural policy needs to be maintained. Many of you mentioned that – that we also need to maintain a big ‘C’ for common in the common agricultural policy.

    Also, I believe all of you shared that we need a coherent toolbox for the first and the second pillar obligations. I think rural development depends heavily on the common agricultural policy, and that needs to be taken into account. Mr Flanagan also mentioned that the structure of the common agricultural policy currently is not too bad, and that we have to build on the successes and maybe fix what is not working ideally. That is why I always pledge that we need an evolution of the common agricultural policy and not a revolution. This is largely shared as well by the ministers when I meet them at the Agrifish Council.

    Also, what most of you said is that we need the appropriate financial firing power in order to deal with the many challenges. The challenges have not become fewer over the last more than six decades; I think they have become greater. We face huge geopolitical challenges from the Russian war of aggression in Ukraine and the consequences, but as well from trade tensions with other economies, and also climate change and environmental challenges. I think these challenges have become bigger. Therefore, I also believe that we need to keep up the financial support for our farmers. But as you know, whatever the Commission proposal will be, it will heavily depend on what the Member States will be willing to contribute to that budget. So I think that is very important to recall and to work on that as well.

    Another shared point that I heard from many of you, and that is as well central in the vision for the future of agriculture and food, is the challenge of generational renewal, because currently, less than 12 % of our farmers in the European Union are below the age of 40, and the average age is above 57 years of age. In some Member States it’s better; in some it’s even worse. So I think that is a huge challenge that we need to take into account. But when we speak about that, there will as well be discussions that may be more painful. Some of you ask for more support financially for young farmers. Well, if we give more to one, we have to take it from somewhere. So this discussion will of course have to be addressed; that is very clear.

    Many of you mentioned a fairer distribution as well, but when it becomes fairer, there will always be winners and losers. That is something that we need to address together. In autumn, I will present a strategy for the generation renewal. And many of you have mentioned it is not only the EU policy, it is also initiatives that need to be taken at national level. They need to work together when it comes to, for example, pension systems, etc., and better support for young farmers. I think there is a lot that can be done in synergies between European and national politics. So this is very important to me. It is very dear to my heart because we can always speak about food security, but if there is nobody left to do it anymore, then we have a problem and then we will face dependency. I will never want to be dependent on somebody else outside the European Union for the quantity and the quality of our food that we consume three times a day. I think that has to be acknowledged.

    Also, when it comes to challenges such as climate change and environmental protection, I don’t see the farmers as the problem. They are the first victims of climate change, but I also say they are our best line of defence. So that’s why I want the farmers to be part of the solution and not of the problem. Therefore, it is our common duty to enable our farmers to be part of the solution – to design policies that are up for the task, to give incentives that are up to the task and sufficiently attractive for the farmers to allow them to combine productive agriculture with protecting our resources. I think that will be the key challenge, and therefore I would like to work together with you, and your own-initiative report is very helpful in that sense as well. I, of course, hope for a strong budget for the common agricultural policy to be able to tackle the many challenges that we are facing. Therefore, I am counting on your support and I will continue my fight in that direction.

    		  
       

    		 

      Presidente. – La discussione è chiusa.

    		  

    4. European Citizens’ Initiative ‘Cohesion policy for the equality of the regions and sustainability of the regional cultures’ (debate)

    		 

      Francesco Ventola, autore. – Signora Presidente, gentile Commissario, onorevoli colleghi, l’iniziativa dei cittadini europei è uno strumento straordinario che hanno i nostri concittadini per poter avanzare iniziative, proposte, idee e suggerimenti rispetto al percorso legislativo che compete alla Commissione e a noi.

    Anche nell’ambito della politica di coesione, non più tardi del 31 marzo di quest’anno sono state depositate oltre 1 270 000 firme di cittadini dell’Unione europea, di otto Stati diversi, che hanno proposto una serie di iniziative riguardanti la possibilità che ci sia maggiore coesione nelle nostre regioni, che vengano eliminate o superate le differenze tra regione e regione, che vengano valorizzate anche le minoranze linguistiche e tutte le attività socio‑culturali identitarie di ogni singola regione.

    Uno strumento – come dicevo prima – straordinario, perché rappresenta un po’ uno dei pilastri della nostra Unione europea, perché consente ai cittadini di potersi esprimere.

    A noi l’onere e l’onore di poter fare nostre queste iniziative.

    Ebbene, il 25 giugno 2025 la commissione REGI, unitamente alle commissioni LIBE, CULT e PETI, ha avviato un percorso di confronto. Ci sono state diverse audizioni, alle quali hanno partecipato anche i membri della direzione. Sono venuti fuori tantissimi spunti molto interessanti, che credo possano sicuramente far bene e dare suggerimenti importanti alle nuove politiche di coesione.

    Il dibattito di oggi ci offre un’altra occasione, quella non solo di poter ascoltare i commissari, di poter definire quelle che possono essere non voglio dire le conclusioni, ma sicuramente un dibattito proficuo che possa indicare la retta via per eliminare e favorire maggiori uguaglianze.

    Eliminare le disuguaglianze tra le diverse regioni è uno degli obiettivi della politica di coesione, e io aggiungerei anche quello di creare le condizioni affinché tutti i cittadini siano portati a poter scegliere del proprio futuro, dove poter vivere e non essere costretti a dover abbandonare la propria terra natia.

    Concludo: sicuramente è uno strumento straordinario di democrazia che rende ancora più importante la nostra Unione europea.

    		  
       

    		 

      Bogdan Rzońca, autor. – Pani Przewodnicząca! Z przyjemnością przyjęliśmy wszyscy informację o tym, że ponad 1,2 miliona Europejczyków poparło Europejską Inicjatywę Obywatelską. Ta inicjatywa wypływa z głębokiego przekonania, że Unia Europejska jest bardzo silna wtedy, kiedy jest różnorodna nie tylko pod względem narodów i języków, ale również regionów – regionów, ich kultur oraz specyfiki społeczno- gospodarczej. Zasada spójności terytorialnej została zapisana w Traktacie o funkcjonowaniu Unii Europejskiej. Jednakże różnice między regionami są nadal znaczne: nierówności gospodarcze, spadek liczby ludności, wyludnienie, ograniczony dostęp do usług publicznych czy erozja kultur lokalnych zagrażają spójności i jedności naszego wspólnego europejskiego projektu.

    Inicjatywa ta wzywa Komisję do podjęcia konkretnych kroków, aby polityka regionalna skuteczniej promowała równość między regionami, w szczególności tymi borykającymi się z trudnościami strukturalnymi, w szczególności gwarantując sprawiedliwy dostęp do funduszy unijnych dla wszystkich regionów, zwłaszcza tych o szczególnych wyzwaniach kulturowych, geograficznych czy gospodarczych, uznając i chroniąc regionalne tożsamości i kulturowe regionalne tradycje jako żywe elementy dziedzictwa kulturowego i społecznego tkanki europejskiej. Promując także zrównoważony rozwój i samowystarczalność regionów poprzez wspieranie lokalnych gospodarek oraz ożywienie demograficzne. Wzmacniając zarządzanie regionów i udział obywateli w kształtowaniu projektów i strategii rozwoju finansowego w Unii Europejskiej.

    Ta inicjatywa nie ma na celu podziału czy separacji. Wręcz przeciwnie – chodzi o wzmocnienie jedności przez sprawiedliwość, o umożliwienie wszystkim częściom Europy rozwoju i znaczącego wkładu w naszą wspólną przyszłość. Inicjatywa ta domaga się równości, a nie jednolitości w polityce unijnej. A polityka spójności powinna odzwierciedlać barwną mozaikę Unii Europejskiej.

    		  
       

    		 

      Hadja Lahbib, Member of the Commission. – Madam President, honourable Members, thank you for the opportunity to address you today.

    Cultural and linguistic diversity, respect for the rights of people belonging to minorities: these are founding values of the European Union, as well as the value of participatory democracy. It is in this light that the Commission is carefully examining this citizens’ initiative. Any action we take must be in line with the competences conferred by the Treaties, while matters outside those competences remain the responsibilities of the Member States. Within these limits and the framework set by the registration decision, the Commission is exploring if further measures are necessary to address the concerns raised by the initiative.

    Cohesion policy is Europe’s investment policy for regions, cities and rural areas to give Europeans the right to stay in the place they call home, ensuring access to job opportunities and public services and enhancing the quality of life for EU citizens. The European Regional Development Fund already invests around EUR 22 billion in inclusive growth and the integration of marginalised groups, together with EUR 2 billion from the European Social Fund Plus, which includes support for communities with specific linguistic and cultural characteristics. A further EUR 5.2 billion is being invested in culture and heritage initiatives.

    In delivering these actions, cohesion policy follows the shared management principle, which gives Member States, regional and local authorities key roles in the design and implementation of cohesion policy programmes. One of our key principles is partnership, which requires the meaningful involvement of stakeholders, including civil society and organisations representing marginalised groups, throughout the programme lifecycle.

    We also pay particular attention to the Charter of Fundamental Rights, including Article 21, which prohibits discrimination based on membership of a national minority. So cohesion policy already addresses many of the concerns raised by this initiative and, in fact, since this initiative was first discussed many years ago, we have strengthened provisions on non-discrimination. Our current legal framework requires compliance with the Charter of Fundamental Rights in the implementation of the funds. Effective mechanisms for compliance with the Charter are a precondition for funding, setting up appropriate measures to prevent discrimination at every stage of the programmes – in preparation, implementation, monitoring, reporting and evaluation. Furthermore, managing authorities must establish and apply transparent and non-discriminatory criteria and procedures for the selection of individual operations, with arrangements in place to ensure the effective examination of complaints.

    In conclusion, we believe that these measures in place – including measures implemented since the citizens’ initiative was introduced – go a large way to addressing these concerns. But the Commission is committed to the principles of non-discrimination and participatory democracy, so we are examining if further measures are necessary. We very much welcome the Parliament’s input and support, of course.

    		  
       

    		 

      Iuliu Winkler, a PPE képviselőcsoport nevében. – Tisztelt Elnök Asszony! Biztos Asszony! Teljes mértékben támogatom a „Kohéziós politika a Régiók egyenlőségéért” nevezetű európai polgári kezdeményezés céljait, és arra kérem Önöket is, tisztelt Kollegák, hogy hasonlóképpen tegyenek! Az európai polgári kezdeményezést azért hozta létre a Lisszaboni Szerződés, hogy segítsen közelebb hozni az embereket az Európai Unióhoz. Ma a hibrid háború és a félretájékoztatás korában erre igazán nagy szükség mutatkozik. Közelebb kell hozzuk a nemzeti kisebbségeket is az Unióhoz reájuk szabott eszközökkel, beleértve azokat az őshonos kisebbségeket is, amelyek tagjai nemzeti régiókban élnek. Emiatt csatlakozom a polgári kezdeményezés elindítóihoz, kérve az Európai Bizottságot arra, hogy indítson jogalkotási folyamatot, és keressen uniós hatáskörökön belüli megoldásokat.

    Mivel a kohéziós politika célja a régiók közötti különbségeknek az enyhítése, az egyenlőtlenségek csökkentése. Ezért egy lehetséges megoldás az Interreg programok, különösen a határokon átnyúló és a régiók közötti együttműködési programok kiterjesztése a nemzeti régiókban élő helyi közösségek támogatására. A kohéziós politika alapelve, hogy senki nem maradhat le, és ez nemcsak a társadalmi csoportokra, hanem a sajátos történelmi örökséggel rendelkező régiókra is vonatkozik, tehát a nemzeti régiókra is alkalmazandó. Bízom benne, hogy az Európai Bizottság érdemben fog reagálni a polgári kezdeményezés elindítóinak javaslataira, és jogalkotási folyamat elindításával fog válaszolni azoknak az embereknek az elvárásaira, akik aláírásukkal támogatták a “Kohéziós politika, a régiók egyenlőségéért és a regionális kultúrák fenntarthatóságáért” című kezdeményezést.

    		  
       

    		 

      Alex Agius Saliba, f’isem il-grupp S&D. – Sur President, kollegi, l-inizjattiva taċ-ċittadini Ewropej hija tfakkira b’saħħitha tar-rwol ċentrali li ċ-ċittadini għandu jkollhom fil-politika Ewropea. Fejn tidħol il-politika ta’ koeżjoni, ir-rwol taċ-ċittadini tagħna li jiġu affettwati b’mod dirett, fl-aħħar mill-aħħar, fejn tidħol din il-politika, fejn jidħlu l-fondi indirizzati direttament lejn il-koeżjoni, hija kruċjali aktar minn qatt qabel.

    U llum ħa nkun qiegħed nitkellem bħala rappreżentant ġej mill-iżgħar Stat Membru, Malta. Hu pajjiż li jaffaċċja diversi sfidi; sfidi ta’ insularità doppja, il-vulnerabilità demografika tagħna u l-aċċess mhux ugwali għal diversi opportunitajiet, b’mod ċentrali wkoll is-suq komuni Ewropew. U allura l-opportunitajiet u l-politika ta’ koeżjoni għal Stati Membri żgħar, Stati Membri insulari bħal Malta, huma kruċjali. Kruċjali sabiex jiġu protetti r-reġjuni tagħna b’karatteristiċi kulturali differenti, karatteristiċi lingwistiċi differenti, karatteristiċi etniċi li huma distinti.

    U għalhekk l-iffinanzjar, ir-rispett lejn il-vuċijiet lokali u l-preservazzjoni tad-diversità rikka tal-Unjoni Ewropea għandha tibqa’ kruċjali, ċentrali fil-politika ta’ koeżjoni tagħna. Ejja nirrikonoxxu din l-inizjattiva bħala kontribut importanti lejn il-politika ta’ koeżjoni Ewropea, ġustizzja, dinjità, il-progress tanġibbli tar-reġjuni kollha, irrispettivament mid-daqs u mill-istatus tagħhom.

    		  
       

    		 

      Kinga Gál, a PfE képviselőcsoport nevében. – Tisztelt Elnök Asszony, Biztos Asszony! Ez az európai polgári kezdeményezés szívügyem. Tizenkét éve követem figyelemmel küzdelmes alakulását, és ellentétben a biztos asszony által mondott szép szavakkal, gyakorlatilag a Bizottság mindent megtett, hogy ellehetetlenítse és akadályozza ezt a polgári kezdeményezést. Édesapám vidéke pedig épp egy olyan magyarlakta régió Romániában, amelynek szüksége lenne a kiemelt figyelemre. Ezek a régiók Európa-szerte ugyanazzal a problémával küzdenek: elvándorolni kényszerülnek a fiatalok, mert nem egyenlőek az esélyeik. Nincs egyértelmű jövőkép. kohéziós politikával és jogszabályalkotással a Bizottságnak meg lennének az eszközei, hogy támogassa e régiókban élő közösségek ügyét, a hagyományos nemzeti és nyelvi kisebbségekhez tartozó mintegy ötvenmillió állampolgárt.

    Sajnos a politikai akarat épp ezen közösségek esetében diszkriminatív módon mindig hiányzik, pedig konkrét helyzetekről és életekről van szó, nem elvont normaalkotásról. Konkrét cselekvésre van végre szükség. Előmozdítani ezen közösségek boldogulását szülőföldjükön, megőrizni a kulturális értékeket és hagyományokat. Olyan beruházásokat eszközölni, amelyekkel megelőzhetőek természeti katasztrófák, mint például a székelyföldi árvizek vagy a parajdi sóbánya esete. A bizottság ellenséges, megkülönböztető hozzáállása elfogadhatatlan. Most itt az idő, hogy végre cselekedjen, és több mint egymillió állampolgár kérését komolyan vegye!

    		  
       

    		 

      Antonella Sberna, a nome del gruppo ECR. – Signora Presidente, signora Commissaria, onorevoli colleghi, l’iniziativa dei cittadini europei, di cui discutiamo oggi, solleva un tema che migliaia di persone ci hanno portato all’attenzione con forza e convinzione: gli strumenti europei devono essere strutturati per servire di più e meglio i territori, con particolare riferimento anche alle aree interne.

    La politica di coesione, ad esempio, dispone già oggi di strumenti importanti, quali il principio di partenariato, la clausola di non discriminazione e il sostegno al patrimonio culturale, tutti meccanismi che aiutano a custodire le identità culturali, linguistiche e storiche distintive. Tale politica, nel preservare la ricchezza delle nostre culture regionali, non è solo uno strumento economico, ma un impegno sociale e culturale, che mira a colmare i divari territoriali garantendo pari opportunità di sviluppo e qualità della vita.

    Rafforzare gli strumenti esistenti, semplificare le procedure e valorizzare le diversità come risorsa significa costruire una coesione vera, concreta, decentrata e fondata sulla responsabilità condivisa.

    Il lavoro che ci attende è vigilare affinché ci sia un’applicazione più omogenea ed efficace, affinché nessun territorio venga escluso o trascurato, poiché solo attraverso un equilibrio tra crescita economica sostenibile e rispetto delle specificità culturali potremo costruire un’Europa più equa, inclusiva e forte.

    E il prossimo bilancio post‑2027 dovrà necessariamente tenere conto di queste esigenze, rendendo la coesione ancora più vicina ai cittadini e alle loro identità.

    		  
       

    		 

      Gabriella Gerzsenyi (PPE). – Tisztelt Elnök Asszony! Tisztelt Biztos Asszony! Tisztelt Képviselő Társak! Gyermekkoromban megtapasztaltam, milyen egy nemzet része lenni egy országhatáron kívüli régióban. Kárpátaljai magyarként láttam, milyen kihívásokkal kell szembenézni, ugyanakkor azt is, micsoda erőt ad a nemzeti közösség számára a közös nyelv, a kultúra és az összetartozás. A nemzeti régiókról szóló európai polgári kezdeményezést 1,4 millió uniós polgár írta alá. Ez az első lépés a sikerhez. Egyetértek az aláírókkal és az alapelvekkel. A kohéziós politika legfontosabb célja a regionális egyenlőtlenségek leküzdése, ezáltal valósul meg a „senkit nem hagyunk hátra” elv. A kezdeményezést tanulmányozva úgy látom, a nemzeti régiók megfelelő jogi elismerése jó lehetőséget teremthet ehhez.

    Hiszem, hogy a kohéziós politika által a nemzeti régiók sokszínűsége erősödhet, kulturális és nyelvi sajátosságaik pedig kiteljesedhetnek. Az uniós támogatásoknak helyben kell hasznosulniuk, a közösségi összetartozást erősítve. Ez alól pedig a nemzeti régiók sem lehetnek kivételek. Biztosítani kell számukra az uniós forrásokhoz való egyenlő hozzáférést.

    		  
       

    		 

      Marcos Ros Sempere (S&D). – Señora presidenta, señora comisaria, la Unión Europea es la unión de nuestras culturas, un crisol de diferentes patrimonios que nos convierte en la tierra más rica del mundo.

    Sin embargo, en las regiones más pequeñas el acervo cultural está en riesgo: tradiciones, rituales, lenguas, canciones… constituyen una parte de la inmensa riqueza cultural de la Unión Europea y no podemos consentir que se pierdan.

    El mejor salvavidas para nuestras regiones es la política de cohesión; pero, comisaria, una política de cohesión que hoy, más que nunca, está en riesgo ante la propuesta del nuevo marco financiero. Necesitamos reforzar los fondos de la política de cohesión para proteger nuestro acervo cultural, que está en riesgo en muchas regiones. No podemos consentir que se pierda la política de cohesión y se diluya en un fondo único por Estado.

    Las regiones y ciudades deben seguir siendo el eje central de una política de cohesión modernizada, descentralizada y adaptada a los nuevos retos de la Unión Europea; porque perder cultura es perder Unión Europea.

    		  
       

    		 

      André Rougé (PfE). – Madame la Présidente, Madame le Commissaire, chers collègues, adapter la politique de cohésion de l’Union européenne aux nouveaux défis du temps est une ambition légitime. Nous y sommes d’autant plus sensibles que nos régions ultrapériphériques – je veux bien sûr parler ici des outre-mer français – cumulent les handicaps de l’insularité et de l’éloignement. La richesse de leur patrimoine culturel, valeur ajoutée pour la France, demeure aussi par trop méconnue.

    Parents pauvres de la politique de cohésion, ces régions doivent faire l’objet d’une meilleure attention. Des adaptations du cadre réglementaire, comme celles annoncées par le commissaire Fitto, vont dans le bon sens. Cependant, le principe de solidarité entre régions ne saurait se traduire éternellement par un transfert systématique des fonds des États contributeurs nets, comme la France, vers les mêmes bénéficiaires nets, au détriment de nos territoires en difficulté.

    Quant à la conditionnalité liée à l’état de droit, qui punit les peuples par le gel des fonds pour des motifs idéologiques, elle constitue un détournement inacceptable de la vocation de la politique de cohésion, qui est de réduire les écarts de développement.

    (L’orateur accepte une question carton bleu)

    		  
       

    		 

      Raquel García Hermida-Van Der Walle (Renew), blue-card question. – I will be speaking in English. Thank you, Madam President, and thank you, colleague, for your intervention. I appreciate your concern with cohesion policy and I really appreciate you mentioning the outermost regions, because the outermost regions are one of the most affected regions by climate change.

    And as the group of the Patriots, it’s very surprising to see that you’re so interested in the well-being of the outermost regions, also in France, but not the well-being of outermost regions when it comes to protecting them from climate change, which the European Union is trying to do. So could you please explain how you see the difference there working?

    		  
       

    		 

      Guillaume Peltier (ECR). – Madame la Présidente, «culture régionale», cette triste expression qui traduit le froid mépris de Bruxelles pour ce que nous appelons, nous les peuples, l’«identité des nations».

    Après des mois d’hiver dans les couloirs gris d’une institution déracinée, venez avec moi visiter les grandeurs de la France. Écoutez la petite fille Espérance qui vous conduit sur les chemins de notre apanage, par les pierres de saint Bernard à Vézelay, par les souvenirs de Jeanne d’Arc à Vaucouleurs, par la grand-route des cathédrales et des calvaires qui tissent le manteau éternel de la France. Vous y croiserez le Mont-Saint-Michel, les arènes de Nîmes, les hautes tuiles de mille couleurs des Hospices de Beaune, Notre-Dame ressuscitée ou encore le château des rois, à Chambord, bien sûr.

    Vous communierez avec l’héritage de la France et de la seule Europe que nous aimons, celle de la civilisation. Vous verrez que tout se réconcilie et s’éclaire au-devant des trésors de nos pères. La France n’est pas une culture régionale, elle est la fille aînée de la beauté du monde!

    		  
       

    		 

      Joachim Streit (Renew). – Frau Präsidentin! Diese Bürgerinitiative bietet uns die Möglichkeit, die Schätze unserer Regionen, unser kulturelles und geographisches Erbe, ins Licht zu rücken. Denken Sie nur an die Weinstraße in der Pfalz, die Mosel, die Nahe, die Lahn-Region, den Westerwald und die Eifel und viele mehr – das sind unsere Schätze, die nachhaltige Reiseziele sind. Wir brauchen mehr davon. Wir brauchen andere von der EU unterstützte Reiseziele in Rheinland-Pfalz und in ganz Deutschland. Darin liegt unser ungenutztes touristisches Potenzial.

    Es ist sicherlich nicht alles Gold, was glänzt, aber man muss das Quorum hier senken. Wir haben so viele Ziele, auf die wir stolz sein können. Mithilfe der EU werden wir diese Sterne glänzen lassen. Und als Freie Wähler in der künftigen Regierung von Rheinland-Pfalz werden wir einen Euro pro Übernachtung zusätzlich in das Marketing des Tourismus investieren. Denn Tourismus ist eine Leitökonomie des 21. Jahrhunderts.

    		  
       

    		 

      Volker Schnurrbusch (ESN). – Frau Präsidentin, meine Damen und Herren! Ich komme aus einer Region, in der nationale Minderheiten besonders geschützt sind. Ihre ethnische, kulturelle und sprachliche Eigenart ist es wert, erhalten zu werden. Sie gehören zu den 340 autochthonen Minderheiten mit 100 Millionen Menschen, die zur Kultur Europas beitragen. Sie stehen für echte Vielfalt und nicht irgendwelche absurden Umzüge unter der Regenbogenfahne. Die vorliegende Bürgerinitiative will, dass nationale Minderheiten in der Kohäsionspolitik besser berücksichtigt werden. Es ist eine Schande, dass diese Kommission eine ähnliche Bürgerinitiative vor vier Jahren abgelehnt hat. Ob es die ungarische Minderheit in Rumänien ist oder die deutschen Minderheiten in Schlesien, Südtirol oder Siebenbürgen – diese kulturellen Schätze müssen geschützt und gefördert werden. Ansonsten ist das Versprechen der EU, für gleiche Lebensverhältnisse zu sorgen, nicht mehr als bloßes Gerede. Übrigens: Das Land in Europa, das die Rechte der nationalen Minderheiten am meisten mit Füßen tritt, ist die Ukraine. Auch aus diesem Grund hat die Ukraine nichts in der EU zu suchen.

    		  
       

    		 

      Fidias Panayiotou (NI). – Madam President, the European Union wants to take money from its development funds and use it for war.

    Yes, my friends, it’s true: the European Union intends to take money from its cohesion policy, which accounts for 30 % of its total budget. This budget is meant for the development of Europe’s poorest regions, but they will use part of it for defence, which essentially means war.

    In fact, the reason why we are here today in the European Parliament debating it is because of an initiative signed by more than 1.2 million European citizens who have got together to give a clear message to us, the European politicians: they want our cohesion policy to focus on the development of our regions and the preservation of their culture.

    But here comes the European Commission and, instead of listening to its citizens, it proposes to use its cohesion funds for re-armament and war. I will be very clear with my message: forget about using our money for warmongering, be more creative. Thank you, I love you all.

    		  
       

    		 

      Daniel Buda (PPE). – Doamnă președintă, stimați colegi, doamnă comisar, Uniunea Europeană s-a construit pe principiul solidarității și al egalității. Politica de coeziune este menită să reducă decalajele dintre regiuni pe baza nevoilor obiective, economice și sociale, și nicidecum pe alte criterii.

    Am luat notă de această inițiativă și, respectând și susținând principiul diversității Europei, nu cred că fondurile europene pot fi alocate în funcție de criterii etnice sau identitare, deoarece acest lucru, în opinia mea, ar duce la o izolare a acestor regiuni. Europa înseamnă unitate în diversitate. Regiunile au nevoie de sprijin pentru a combate sărăcia, izolarea sau lipsa infrastructurii, indiferent de limbă sau religie. Politica de coeziune nu trebuie să fie transformată într-un instrument de fragmentare ori de creare a unor regiuni privilegiate, în care apartenența la o anumită minoritate să conteze mai mult decât nevoile reale ale populației.

    Minoritățile naționale, fără discuție, au nevoie de un cadru legal care să permită păstrarea valorilor tradiționale, culturale și identitare. Și mă bucur că astăzi țara mea, România, este un exemplu de bune practici la nivel internațional. Învățământul garantat în limba minorităților naționale, accesul în forurile de decizie, inclusiv la nivel guvernamental, dar și regional sunt doar câteva exemple.

    Înainte de toate însă, doamnă comisar, trebuie să spunem un lucru foarte clar. Avem nevoie de o politică de coeziune care să nu fie diluată în alte politici. Avem nevoie de o finanțare adecvată a acestei politici de coeziune, astfel încât să putem susține toate regiunile Uniunii Europene.

    		  
       

    		 

      Hannes Heide (S&D). – Frau Präsidentin, Frau Kommissarin! In Vielfalt geeint ist die Grundlage der Europäischen Union. So wie Kohäsion, also Zusammenhalt, das Herz der Europapolitik ist und auch bleiben muss. Sie darf sich nicht allein an wirtschaftlichen Kennzahlen orientieren, muss alle Bürgerinnen und Bürger erreichen und hat somit auch auf sprachliche, kulturelle und historische Besonderheiten einzugehen.

    Diese Bürgerinitiative richtet den Blick auf Regionen mit historisch gewachsenen kulturellen, sprachlichen oder religiösen Identitäten mit wenig oder keiner ausreichenden politischen Vertretung oder administrativen Zuständigkeit. Zu Recht setzt sich die Bürgerinitiative für einen Zugang zu EU-Fördermitteln ein. Das aktuelle Eurobarometer bestätigt diesen Anspruch eindrucksvoll: 79 % der Bürgerinnen und Bürger, die von der EU geförderte Projekte kennen, erleben sie als positiv für ihre Region, und fast zwei Drittel fordern, dass EU-Investitionen in alle Regionen fließen sollen.

    Das ist ein klarer Auftrag. Kohäsionspolitik muss gerecht, gezielt und sensibel kulturelle Vielfalt fördern und regionale Besonderheiten schützen.

    		  
       

    		 

      Rody Tolassy (PfE). – Madame la Présidente, chers collègues, la Commission européenne a une nouvelle fois démontré son incapacité à répondre aux besoins spécifiques des régions ultrapériphériques. Malgré les promesses de cohésion et d’égalité, les territoires d’outre-mer restent les oubliés de l’Europe. Les règles européennes, rigides et uniformes, ignorent nos réalités géographiques, économiques et culturelles. Où sont les adaptations concrètes des fonds structurels pour compenser leur éloignement? Où est le soutien spécifique pour préserver leur identité unique face à la mondialisation?

    La Commission se contente de belles paroles, mais les chiffres parlent: chômage endémique, dépendance économique et sous-financement chronique. Il est temps que Bruxelles cesse de traiter ces régions comme des marges et qu’elle propose des mesures audacieuses, taillées sur mesure, pour leur développement et pour leur dignité. Il a fallu l’initiative citoyenne et l’engagement des députés du groupe des Patriotes pour faire valoir ce droit: l’adaptation.

    Je demande ainsi, entre autres, à la Commission l’amplification du dispositif Archipel.eu pour soutenir une politique régionale ambitieuse en faveur de la culture et de la création. L’Europe doit être celle de toutes ses régions, pas seulement des capitales.

    		  
       

    		 

      Nora Junco García (ECR). – Señora presidente, señora comisaria, señorías, ¿de qué sirve tener la política de cohesión más ambiciosa del mundo si luego los Gobiernos no ejecutan ni un euro? España es el ejemplo más escandaloso: de los más de 36 000 millones EUR asignados en el período 2021‑2027, el Gobierno solo ha solicitado un 2,7 % y ha gastado exactamente 0 EUR.

    Lo ha dicho y nos lo está advirtiendo el Banco de España, no la oposición: nuestros pueblos pierden servicios, las provincias están más despobladas y en desigualdad, mientras que los fondos duermen en cajones. Esto es un insulto a los ciudadanos y a los principios de la Unión. Lo que tenemos no es falta de dinero, es falta de gobierno, incompetencia, propaganda y abandono del territorio.

    Comisión, desde aquí les pido con toda claridad que presionen al Gobierno español para que active de inmediato los mecanismos de ejecución. La política de cohesión solo tiene sentido si llega a la ciudadanía, si se ejecuta y si se transforma. Y para eso hacen falta Gobiernos que trabajen, no que vivan del relato.

    		  
       

    		 

      Rosa Estaràs Ferragut (PPE). – Señora presidenta, señor comisaria, la diversidad cultural y lingüística de toda la Unión Europea y el respeto a las personas que pertenecen a minorías son valores fundacionales de nuestra Unión. Velar por la conservación y el desarrollo del patrimonio cultural europeo es una prioridad.

    La política de cohesión ha sido, sin duda, un instrumento de inversión —uno de los más importantes de la Unión— para poder conseguir que no haya diferencias entre las regiones y para poder conseguir un crecimiento más equitativo de la Unión donde sea una realidad la cohesión económica, social y territorial.

    Sin duda, no se entiende la política de cohesión sin las regiones; tiene una dimensión territorial y, por esto, se hace un esfuerzo inversor precisamente con las regiones que tiene más dificultades: insulares, ultraperiféricas, de montaña y un sinfín.

    Como ya han dicho el comisario Fitto en la propia Comisión de Desarrollo Regional y la comisaria, aquí, se ha evolucionado mucho desde la petición que presentaron los peticionarios, con mucha fuerza y, además, en tiempos de pandemia. Con esta evolución, se ha apostado por un crecimiento inclusivo, por un crecimiento donde el patrimonio cultural y el patrimonio cultural regional sean una prioridad junto con la participación de toda la sociedad civil.

    La política de cohesión es el mejor antídoto contra los muros, contra la fragmentación de nuestros territorios. Saben que provengo de Baleares, yo amo profundamente la lengua que allí se habla, el mallorquín propio de las islas, pero también el español. Las lenguas tienen que ser siempre vehículo de comunicación, nunca de confrontación. Hay dos enemigos de las lenguas: los que las imponen y los que las prohíben, y también los que mercadean con ellas.

    		  
       

    		 

      Sabrina Repp (S&D). – Frau Präsidentin! Dat Plattdüütsch mutt blieven und eine starke Kohäsionspolitik auch. Kommende Woche werden die Vorschläge zum mehrjährigen Finanzrahmen seitens der Kommission vorgestellt. Der Eingangssatz steht nicht nur für eine Sprache, sondern für ein ganzes Lebensgefühl. Dass Sprache, Kultur und Zugehörigkeit nicht altmodisch sind, sondern ein Teil von dem, was Europa stark macht. Ob in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, bei den Sorben oder anderswo: Überall in Europa gibt es Menschen, die ihre Sprache, ihre Traditionen und ihre regionale Identität bewahren wollen – oft ohne viel Unterstützung. Genau da setzt Kohäsionspolitik an. Sie will, dass auch kleine Regionen, kulturelle Minderheiten und regionale Sprachen in der EU endlich ernst genommen werden. Regionale Kultur und Sprache sind kein Luxus, sie sind Teil unserer gemeinsamen europäischen Identität. Wir brauchen eine Politik, die genau das unterstützt, mit Sichtbarkeit, mit Zugang zu Bildung, zu Förderung, zu grenzüberschreitender Kooperation und mit dem Raum, die eigene Sprache zu leben und zu sprechen – ganz selbstverständlich. Dat Plattdüütsch mutt blieven und all die anderen Sprachen und Kulturen auch. Das geht nur, wenn die Regionen auch im künftigen mehrjährigen Finanzrahmen eine zentrale Rolle spielen. Dazu rufe ich die Kommission auf. Denn das, was Europa stark macht, ist seine Vielfalt und sein Zusammenhalt. Das geht nur Seite an Seite mit den Regionen.

    		  
       

    		 

      Juan Fernando López Aguilar (S&D). – Señora presidenta, señora comisaria, es una iniciativa ciudadana. Consigue un millón de firmas en siete Estados miembros, al menos. Por tanto, merece respeto, además de ejercer un derecho reconocido en el artículo 11 del Tratado de la Unión Europea.

    Pero, además, se hace eco de preocupaciones muy compartidas en este Parlamento Europeo, entre ellas las mías: la primera, con un presupuesto de apenas un 1 % del PIB europeo, el contraste entre las ambiciones proclamadas y los medios es insoportable; la segunda, no se puede hacer más con menos, de manera que si tenemos nuevas ambiciones, como defensa y seguridad, no se puede hacer en perjuicio de la política de cohesión y de la política regional, que son la razón de ser de la Unión Europea —lo que incluye la política regional del artículo 164 del Tratado de Funcionamiento de la Unión Europea y la política social (que quiere crecer hacia la vivienda, un derecho), a que se refiere el artículo 162—; y la tercera, no puede haber sobres nacionales bajo ningún concepto, porque hace falta incluir activamente a las regiones, ese modelo de gobernanza multinivel que atiende las especialidades y las singularidades, incluidas las regiones ultraperiféricas, como es el caso de Canarias.

    Por tanto, un mensaje muy claro: la política regional debe preservarse y el Fondo Social Europeo también. Esa es la razón de ser de Europa.

    		  
       

    		 

      Loránt Vincze (PPE). – Madame la Présidente, madame la Commissaire, l’égalité est au cœur du projet européen. Pourtant, 50 millions de citoyens, issus des minorités traditionnelles des différentes régions d’Europe, restent ignorés par la Commission. Vous avez été mandatés pour défendre toutes les minorités, mais, lorsqu’il s’agit des communautés historiques enracinées depuis des siècles en Europe, on ne vous entend plus.

    Pourtant, ces communautés représentent près de 90 % de notre diversité linguistique et culturelle. Elles ne se manifestent pas bruyamment, mais elles défendent leurs langues, leurs traditions, leur identité avec dignité. Elles sont bretonne, alsacienne, frisonne, hongroise, sud-tyrolienne… Beaucoup d’entre elles subissent encore des discriminations et la perte de leur langue. L’exemple de la communauté germanophone de Belgique – aus Belgien –, avec ses droits garantis et ses institutions solides, prouve qu’une autre voie est possible.

    Il est temps que la Commission prenne ses responsabilités. Pas une seule des 11 initiatives citoyennes européennes n’a donné lieu à une initiative législative. Il est temps d’agir. Cette initiative le mérite pleinement.

    		  
       

    		 

      Isilda Gomes (S&D). – Senhora Presidente, a política de coesão é uma conquista fundamental do projeto europeu.

    O seu objetivo é que nenhuma região fique para trás, corrigindo desequilíbrios agravados pelo efeito centrípeto do mercado único, que são agravados pela deficiente arquitetura do euro. Os objetivos desta política estão consagrados nos Tratados porque são fundamentais, não podendo ser subordinados a outras prioridades.

    A coesão não é apenas uma questão económica. É uma condição de justiça social e territorial e de confiança dos cidadãos no projeto europeu.

    Apelo, por isso, à Comissão Europeia para reforçar a ambição da política de coesão na proposta que apresentará na próxima semana, em particular no que respeita ao Fundo Social Europeu Mais e na dotação de verbas suficientes para responder à crise de habitação, que é o problema mais premente que enfrentam as nossas regiões.

    Precisamos de mais coesão, mais solidariedade, para mais Europa.

    		  
       

    		 

      Łukasz Kohut (PPE). – Zjednoczona w różnorodności. To jest motto Unii Europejskiej. Taka powinna być Unia Europejska. Niestety, w zeszłej kadencji, mimo że tutaj, w Parlamencie Europejskim, przegłosowaliśmy inicjatywę obywatelską Minority Safe Park, Komisja zawetowała ten projekt. A to dla mniejszości narodowych i etnicznych w Europie jest ogromny problem.

    Jestem ze Śląska, reprezentuję tutaj nieuznaną śląską mniejszość etniczną. W ostatnim spisie powszechnym 600 tysięcy obywateli Polski zadeklarowało śląską tożsamość. Pół miliona ludzi zadeklarowało, że godo po śląsku. [Mówca wypowiada się w języku niebędącym językiem urzędowym UE.] Domagamy się zrozumienia i funduszy na nasze potrzeby.

    I najwyższy czas, 80 lat po czystkach etnicznych, które na Śląsku przeprowadzili Sowieci ręka w rękę z polskimi komunistami, uznać Ślązaków za mniejszość etniczną, a nasz język za język regionalny. Dlatego wzywam prezydenta elekta Karola Nawrockiego do podpisania ustawy o języku śląskim. I wzywam Komisję do ochrony mniejszości etnicznych i narodowych w całej Unii Europejskiej, bo my umieramy w ciszy. Pieknie dziekuja.

    		  
       

    		 

      Sandra Gómez López (S&D). – Señora presidenta, hoy hablamos de una iniciativa ciudadana europea. Eso significa que no surge de ningún Gobierno ni de ninguna élite, sino que surge de la voz directa de la ciudadanía: ciudadanos y ciudadanas que han dicho que valoran nuestras políticas de cohesión, pero que, además, quieren que respondan a la diversidad y a la riqueza de nuestros territorios.

    Yo, como valenciana, sé lo que es tener una identidad cultural y una riqueza lingüística propia dentro de un Estado miembro. Por lo tanto, les puedo decir que, si la ciudadanía pide más descentralización, ¿cómo puede la Comisión plantearse para el próximo marco financiero un único plan nacional centralizado? No tiene ningún sentido.

    Europa debe escuchar y debe defender la cohesión. Eso no significa imponer uniformidad, sino proteger la diversidad que nos une y… (la oradora se expresa en una lengua no oficial).

    		  
       

    		 

      Andi Cristea (S&D). – Doamnă președintă, „coeziune”, ce cuvânt frumos! Dar dincolo de coeziune este despre ce fel de jocuri alegem să jucăm. Vrem să alegem jocurile cooperării europene sau vrem să săpăm în același loc, să ne săpăm un șanț, să ne săpăm o groapă și după aceea să ne uităm la ceilalți cum se dezvoltă, iar noi rămânem pe loc?

    Vin din București, vin din România și în anul 2000, produsul intern brut al Bucureștiului era de 6 miliarde de euro. Anul acesta, anul trecut, Bucureștiul produce mai mult decât Bulgaria, mai mult decât Serbia, mai mult decât Moldova. Bucureștiul produce cât jumătate din Ungaria. De ce? Pentru că România a ales NATO, a ales Uniunea Europeană și a ales jocurile cooperării europene, jocurile competiției.

    Când tu ai o identitate unică, mai specială decât a celorlalți, acest lucru nu te duce la câștig. Câștigătorii sunt cei care aleg să coopereze și au mai mulți prieteni și aliați. Succes!

    		  
       

       

    Procedura “catch-the-eye”

    		  
       

    		 

      Gabriel Mato (PPE). – Señora presidenta, señora comisaria, en los últimos cinco años, Canarias se ha enfrentado a enormes desafíos: una crisis migratoria persistente, una erupción volcánica devastadora en la isla de La Palma, mi isla, sequías prolongadas y los efectos crecientes del cambio climático.

    Los canarios cumplimos los mismos requisitos que cualquier europeo, pero con muchas más dificultades derivadas de la lejanía y de la insularidad. Por eso, las ayudas de la Unión Europea no son un privilegio, son una necesidad. Canarias necesita asegurar su conectividad, su capacidad para afrontar la transición a una nueva economía verde y digital o la crisis generada por la falta de vivienda y el desempleo juvenil. Y todo ello pasa por recibir y aprovechar plenamente la ayuda que viene de la Unión Europea.

    Por todo ello, Canarias, como el resto de las regiones ultraperiféricas, necesita que los fondos de cohesión se mantengan y, además, que se refuercen y se nos permita adaptarlos a nuestras prioridades. Solo así podremos avanzar al mismo ritmo que el resto de Europa.

    		  
       

    		 

      Arkadiusz Mularczyk (ECR). – Pani Przewodnicząca, pani Komisarz! Wysoka Izbo! Chcę nawiązać do sprawy historycznej, która ma też związek z polityką spójności. W 40. roku dekretem Hermana Göringa został zdelegalizowany i znacjonalizowany Związek Polaków w Niemczech. Dziesiątki Polaków zostało zamordowanych, a ich majątek został zagrabiony przez nazistowskie Niemcy. I do dzisiaj, mimo upływu 80 lat, Niemcy nie chcą zwrócić tego majątku. Nie chcą zrehabilitować działaczy Związku Polaków w Niemczech.

    Mimo tego, iż niemal 2 miliony Polaków żyje w Niemczech, Niemcy nie chcą uznawać, że jest to mniejszość, mniejszość polska. W związku z powyższym nie desygnują środków na naukę języka polskiego, a w urzędach niemieckich nie ma informacji w języku polskim.

    Pani Komisarz, liczę, że zwróci się Pani do kanclerza Niemiec i zapyta co się dzieje ze Związkiem Polaków w Niemczech i dlaczego Niemcy nie chcą się rozliczyć z majątku zrabowanego podczas II wojny światowej.

    		  
       

    		 

      Oihane Agirregoitia Martínez (Renew). – Señora presidenta, nos alegramos muchísimo de que haya llegado esta iniciativa hoy aquí, al Parlamento Europeo, porque se le han puesto muchas dificultades en el camino y ya el Partido Nacionalista Vasco la apoyó en el año 2014.

    Somos muchos y muchas los que creemos en las regiones nacionales europeas y vamos a defender, siempre y en todos los sitios, el artículo 3 del Tratado de la Unión Europea, que habla de respetar su rica diversidad cultural y lingüística. Las regiones nacionales, las identidades nacionales europeas diversas, las culturas y las lenguas minorizadas deben reconocerse como parte del propio potencial europeo en esta nueva Europa reforzada que necesitamos. Son regiones transfronterizas, son macrorregiones, son regiones nacionales: la realidad va mucho más allá de los sentimientos y la Unión Europea debe atenderlas. Tiene la oportunidad de liderar este cambio y reforzar el proyecto europeo desde el reconocimiento de identidades nacionales diversas y realidades regionales diversas.

    		  
       

    		 

      Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă (NI). – Doamnă președintă, în general, apreciez inițiativele cetățenești, numai că în această situație a fost inițiată de către etnici maghiari din România și vreau să vă spun că Transilvania este România. Și nu, nu suntem de acord cu autonomia, pentru că în România, etnicii maghiari au cele mai multe drepturi pe care le puteți afla în orice țară. Suntem exemplu de cum respectăm etnicii maghiari, de la limbă, până când, în aceste județe, Harghita, Covasna, Mureș, efectiv se vorbește numai maghiara și nu ai voie să vorbești româna.

    În acest context, am auzit-o pe o colegă din Ungaria vorbind de Salina Praid. Păi Salina Praid este administrată de un ONG numit Cholnoky Jenő, care funcționează cu bani din Ungaria. Îl pot admira pe Viktor Orbán pentru politica sa externă, dar nu pentru ceea ce face în România. Îi spun: România, Transilvania e România.

    Iar în ceea ce privește regiunile, uitați-vă în Ucraina. România are acolo Bucovina de Nord, Herța, Bugeacul și Hotinul, unde un milion de români sunt discriminați, nu au voie să vorbească limba română, nu au voie să se roage…

    (Președinta a retras cuvântul vorbitoarei)

    		  
       

    		 

      Sebastian Tynkkynen (ECR). – Arvoisa puhemies, mikä tekee Euroopasta Euroopan? Onko se paisuva unioni, virkamiehet ja heidän tuhannet toimistonsa Brysselissä?

    Ei, Euroopasta tekee Euroopan sen kansat.

    Huoli pienten kulttuurien, kielten ja perinteiden säilymisestä on täysin oikeutettua, mutta niiden säilyminen ei voi riippua liittovaltion rahasta. Se riippuu menestyvistä valtioista, jotka pystyvät huolehtimaan kansoista, kulttuureista ja perinteistä.

    EU:n koheesiorahaa ollaan nyt viemässä oikeaan suuntaan. Rahaa lisätään muun muassa puolustukseen ja itärajan alueiden tukemiseen.

    Koheesiorahasto ei kuitenkaan saa olla pohjaton sampo. Euroopan kulttuurien säilymistä voidaan tukea toistakin kautta: tiukemmalla maahanmuuttopolitiikalla, islamistisen kulttuurin leviämisen ehkäisemisellä ja liittovaltiokehityksen lopettamisella. Tehokkaita keinoja, jotka eivät vaadi yhtäkään uutta EU-rahastoa.

    		  
       

       

    (Fine della procedura “catch the eye”)

    		  
       

    		 

      Hadja Lahbib, Member of the Commission. – Madam President, honourable Members, thank you for this very rich debate. The Commission takes good note of the points you raised.

    The Commission, as you know, is currently reviewing the instruments and safeguards for partnership and non‑discrimination in light of this citizens’ initiative. We take the principle of non‑discrimination very seriously and we’ll assess how we can help advance the goal of the initiative.

    I would like also to reassure you that we take our citizens’ concerns very seriously. Since the launch of European citizens’ initiatives in 2012, the Commission replied to 10 successful initiatives – those that collected over 1 million verified signatures – and committed to follow up actions for nine of them.

    Our diversity is our power, ‘united in diversity’ is our motto, and respect of the rights of persons belonging to minorities is one of the founding values of the EU.

    All European regions are eligible for cohesion policy support. The cohesion policy funds can support specific linguistic cultural characteristics.

    As I said in my introduction, the EU Regional Development Fund already invests around EUR 22 billion in inclusive growth and integration of marginalised groups, EUR 2 billion to support communities with specific linguistic and cultural characteristics, and a further EUR 5.2 billion in cultural heritage initiatives.

    So, I will conclude by saying that the views expressed here in the European Parliament will feed our assessment and the Commission will present its conclusions by 4 September.

    		  
       

       

    (La seduta è sospesa alle 11:51)

    		  
       

       

    IN THE CHAIR: ROBERTA METSOLA
    President

    		  

    5. Resumption of the sitting

       

    (The sitting resumed at 12:00)

    		  
       

    		 

      President. – Dear colleagues, as we mark one year since this legislature began, I want to thank you all, your staff and Parliament’s services for your tireless work. When Europeans voted last year, they asked us to build a stronger, smarter and safer Europe, and that’s exactly what we’ve been doing. We’ve accelerated reforms. We’ve passed legislation to improve people’s lives, safeguard our industries, protect our neighbours and our way of life. I’m proud of what we have achieved together. Thank you very much to all of you.

    Our work continues. Next week, the Commission will present its proposal on the multiannual financial framework in our House. This period will be critical as we negotiate the EU’s long-term budget to match people’s priorities, and I’m counting on all of you to help get it right, because – and it is important that we say it today – regardless of where we sit in this chamber, we are all here for the same reason: to make a real difference in people’s lives. So thank you again, dear colleagues. Let’s keep delivering.

    		  

    6. Voting time

    		 

      President. – The next item is the vote.

    		  

    		 

      Özlem Demirel (The Left). – Frau Präsidentin! Ich berufe mich auf Artikel 188 Absatz 2. Sie haben unseren Änderungsantrag für unzulässig erklärt. Einen Antrag, der klarmacht, Rückführungen nach Syrien sind angesichts systematischer Gewalt gegen Alewiten, Drusen und Christen unverantwortlich. Ihre Entscheidung, Frau Präsidentin, war keine formale, sondern eine politische Entscheidung. Ja, unser Antrag hat den Finger in die Wunde gelegt. Die syrische Übergangsregierung besteht aus früheren Al-Qaida-Milizen und wird trotzdem von Trump und EU‑Präsidentinnen und ‑Präsidenten hofiert. Es geht Ihnen wie immer um geopolitischen Einfluss im Nahen Osten und um schnelle Rückführungen und Abschiebungen von geflüchteten Menschen um jeden Preis. Wenn die Linke das benennt in einer Entschließung, Frau Präsidentin, sagen Sie uns dann, das habe nichts mit dem Thema zu tun? Oh doch, Frau Präsidentin, das hat es. Schutz und das elementare Menschenrecht auf Asyl sind nicht politischer Willkür untergeordnet. Wir verteidigen universelle Menschenrechte. Die Politik der EU ist zynisch und Frau Präsidentin, es tut mir leid, aber Ihre Entscheidung zu unserem Änderungsantrag war klar und deutlich politisch von Ihnen motiviert. Das finden wir inakzeptabel. Wir werden weiterhin die Finger in die Wunde legen.

    		  
       

    		 

      President. – I can assure you that we take our job extremely seriously, especially on declaring and questioning the admissibility of amendments.

    Your amendment was declared inadmissible according to Rule 188(1)(a) of the Rules of Procedure, because it does not directly relate to the text which it seeks to amend.

    		  

    		 

      President. – The next vote is on the case of Ryan Cornelius in Dubai (see minutes, item 6.2).

    		  

    		 

      President. – The next vote is on the arbitrary arrest and torture of Belgian-Portuguese researcher Joseph Figueira Martin in the Central African Republic (see minutes, item 6.3).

    		  

    		 

      President. – The next vote is on the urgent need to protect religious minorities in Syria following the recent terrorist attack on Mar Elias Church in Damascus (see minutes, item 6.4).

    		  

    6.5. Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 as regards obligations of economic operators concerning battery due diligence policies (A10-0134/2025 – Antonio Decaro) (vote)

    		 

      President. – The next vote is on amending Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 as regards obligations of economic operators concerning battery due diligence policies (see minutes, item 6.5).

    		  

    6.6. Future of the EU biotechnology and biomanufacturing sector: leveraging research, boosting innovation and enhancing competitiveness (A10-0123/2025 – Hildegard Bentele) (vote)

       

    – Before the vote:

    		  
       

    		 

      Hildegard Bentele, rapporteur. – Madam President, dear colleagues, I would like to thank you wholeheartedly for, hopefully, the broad support for this report on the future of biotechnology and manufacturing in Europe. With this report, we are a big step ahead of the European Commission. We are defining the criteria for our European biotechnology act, which will see the light only in a year’s time. Not least, the swift development and production of COVID vaccines in Europe has shown us the strong performance, the innovation potential and the huge productivity of this sector.

    But biotechnology is not only about pharma and life science. Thank you for subscribing, hopefully, to the broad scope we are advocating for in this report. This report is about a growth strategy for Europe about further igniting, but also about faster commercialising, innovation, about securing supply and value chains, about smarter financing, about globally compatible and lean regulation, and about speeding up our internal procedures.

    Thank you, colleagues, for sending – in the first year of our mandate – this clear signal of willingness to be competitive in one of the strategic future industry sectors, which provides solutions for our economic and food security, for sustainability and for public health. Let us now make sure that the Commission follows up closely, and I hope to see you all back full of energy in September.

    		  

       

    (The vote closed)

    		  
       

       

    (The sitting was suspended at 12:18)

    		  
       

       

    PRÉSIDENCE: YOUNOUS OMARJEE
    Vice-Président

    		  

    7. Resumption of the sitting

       

    (La séance est reprise à 15:00)

    		  

    8. Approval of the minutes of the sitting

    		 

      Le Président. – Le procès-verbal de la séance d’hier et les textes adoptés sont disponibles. Y a-t-il des observations?

    Il n’y en a pas. Le procès verbal est approuvé.

    		  

    9. Composition of committees and delegations

    		 

      Le Président. – Les députés non inscrits ont communiqué à la Présidente une décision relative à des modifications apportées aux nominations au sein des commissions et délégations. Ces décisions figureront au procès-verbal de la séance d’aujourd’hui et prendront effet à la date de cette annonce.

    		  

    10. Endometriosis: Europe’s wake-up call on the gender health gap (debate)

    		 

      Hadja Lahbib, Member of the Commission. – Mr President, honourable Members, endometriosis impacts millions of women across the EU. It puts a heavy burden on their health and well‑being, with consequences for their fertility and even their lives. This, in turn, has a wider impact on gender equality and on women’s empowerment.

    The Commission adopted the Roadmap for Women’s Rights on International Women’s Day this year. One of its key principles is to ensure high standards of physical and mental health for girls and women by taking into account their perspective and needs throughout research, health policies and actions.

    Some EU countries have launched respective national actions like France, Ireland and Spain. These actions reflect the fact that responsibility for health and social policies and for healthcare services lies with Member States. Union action complements national health policies. We do this, for instance, by helping Member States share knowledge and coordinate between themselves.

    For a long time, the EU has supported research into new treatments to improve citizens’ health. The Commission launched the EU‑wide ‘healthier together’ initiative in 2022 to help address the burden of non‑communicable diseases, which includes endometriosis. The EU4Health funding programme has allocated over EUR 280 million to this initiative.

    The Commission also hosts the EU Best Practice Portal on Public Health, where Member States can share information and insights. And in its meeting in June last year, the Expert Group on Public Health endorsed a comprehensive, prevention‑focused approach to non‑communicable diseases.

    On top of this, over EUR 2 million have been invested in more than 1 000 research and innovation projects on women’s health through Horizon 2020 and Horizon Europe. This portfolio includes 15 projects, worth EUR 47 million, conducting research related to endometriosis.

    Last but not least, in Horizon Europe, the integration of a gender dimension in R&I is a mandatory requirement. This ensures that women’s specific needs are consistently considered across all research domains, thereby promoting more inclusive, equitable and scientifically robust research outcomes.

    Honourable Members, I want to acknowledge the impact of endometriosis on women’s health and on society as a whole as well. We have come a long way, but more could still be done. Further research is needed to better understand the disease pathways and develop targeted treatments and prevention strategies. And we must make women and health professionals aware of the disease and the symptoms for earlier diagnosis and more accurate information.

    From the Commission side, we will keep supporting Member States’ work to address endometriosis and other non‑communicable diseases.

    		  
       

    		 

      András Tivadar Kulja, a PPE képviselőcsoport nevében. – Tisztelt Elnök Úr! Tisztelt Bizottság! Az endometriózis minden tizedik nőt érint. Nők százezrei szenvednek hazánkban, Magyarországon és milliók az Európai Unió más tagállamaiban. Egy olyan betegségtől, amely súlyos vakfolt az egészségpolitikában.

    Az endometriózis nem csupán fájdalmas menstruációt jelent. A valóság sokkal riasztóbb. Az endometriózis azt jelenti, hogy méhszövet jelenik meg a hasüregben vagy a test más pontjaiban, amely ugyanúgy menstruál, mint a méh. Ezzel pedig iszonyatos fájdalmat okoz az érintetteknek, hosszú távon pedig súlyosan károsítja szervezetüket. A diagnózisig gyakran 6-8 év is eltelik, miközben az érintettek folyamatosan együtt élnek a tudattal, hogy a fájdalom hónaprólhónapra visszatér. Fiatal lányok ezreinek tanulmányait akadályozza, mert hiányoznak az iskolából. Felnőtt nők egyenlő munkavállalását és nemi életét teszi tönkre a betegség.

    Mindennapos szorongást okoz azoknak is, akik családot, gyermeket szeretnének, ugyanis a késői felismerés meddőséget, hosszútávon más szervek súlyos károsodását is jelenti, miközben a terápiás lehetőségek szűkösek, sokszor műtétekkel járnak.

    Az Európai Unió több tagállama felismerte, milyen fontos időben cselekedni. Mégis azt látjuk, hogy egyesek csak szóban aktívak. A magyar kormány is többször ígérte, hogy segít az érintetteknek, azonban adókedvezményen kívül valódi támogatást nem nyújtott. És ahogy Európa sok más tagállamában, nálunk is hiányoznak a korai felismerést segítő oktatási és szűrési programok, a korszerű diagnosztikához való hozzáférés, és sok esetben éveket kell várni, hogy megfelelő orvoshoz jussanak el a betegek. Ez pedig súlyos társadalmi egyenlőtlenséghez vezethet.

    A valódi családcentrikus politika alapja a női egészség segítése. Az Európai Uniónak pedig kötelessége kiállni az érintett nők mellett, és segíteni a korai felismerést, az ellátáshoz való hozzáférést, hogy bármely tagállamban is éljenek az érintettek, egyenlő esélyeket kapjanak az életben.

    		  
       

    		 

      Vytenis Povilas Andriukaitis, on behalf of the S&D Group. – Mr President, dear Commissioner, let me start with some sentences. It is incredibly frustrating to see such a sensitive topic as women’s health repeatedly scheduled for the very end of the European Parliament plenary agenda. This consistent demotion of health-related discussions suggests a worrying undervaluation of their importance. Why are these vital conversations related to health being marginalised in this way? It is not the first time it is put last at the end of plenaries. It is such an important topic.

    I want to extend my congratulations to the Commission for taking new steps to address endometriosis, but only with robust actions at EU level do we have the potential to transform the lives of approximately 14 million women. To truly confront this debilitating condition across the EU, we need a focused, multi-pronged strategy that directly improves the daily reality for those affected.

    First and foremost, we must dramatically increase both EU and national funding for endometriosis research. More research will lead to a deeper understanding of this complex disease, paving the way for more effective treatment and, of course, crucially, to create hope because it is such a complicated issue – hope for a cure.

    The EU must also champion and implement supportive policies like paid menstrual leave, as just mentioned. France, Ireland and Spain did it. Furthermore, we need to ensure free and accessible fertility treatment and prioritise robust mental health support because a lot of women suffer. These aren’t just administrative measures; they are about restoring dignity, protecting livelihoods and, of course, offering a brighter future for women.

    Women’s health is so important, and of course the gap exists. We can’t be blind to this very sensitive topic.

    		  
       

    		 

      Margarita de la Pisa Carrión, en nombre del Grupo PfE. – Señor presidente, señora comisaria, señorías, llevamos décadas escuchando hablar de igualdad de género y de millones destinados supuestamente a mejorar la vida de las mujeres, pero este gasto no ha estado enfocado en algo tan importante como es nuestra salud. Hemos visto campañas dirigidas muchas veces a una ingeniería social, mientras los problemas reales que afectan a tantas mujeres, como la endometriosis, siguen completamente invisibilizados.

    Una de cada diez mujeres sufre esta enfermedad, con un dolor intenso y crónico e infertilidad. Sin embargo, no existe un diagnóstico precoz efectivo. La inversión es insuficiente para conseguir tratamientos eficaces. Yo le pregunto lo siguiente: ¿por qué no destinar el gasto en ideología para investigar sobre enfermedades que afectan a la mujer? En la última década, la Unión Europea ha invertido más de 400 000 millones de euros en proyectos relacionados con la igualdad de género y la promoción de políticas de igualdad de género. ¿Dónde está la urgencia política cuando el dolor es real y no solo es un eslogan? Reconozcamos que es poco lo que se ha invertido, pero, claro, ¿qué podemos esperar cuando se trata de una ideología que no puede acordar ni siquiera una definición para lo que quiere decir ser mujer?

    Es vital y urgente una reorientación clara de los fondos públicos de la Unión Europea. Las mujeres necesitamos soluciones reales para problemas reales. Esta enfermedad afecta a millones de mujeres en Europa y representa un coste anual estimado de 30 000 millones de euros solo en bajas laborales. Estoy segura de que toda mujer agradecería que se profundizara sobre las causas, la prevención y el tratamiento. La incidencia no para de aumentar y no se sabe todavía qué factores pueden estar afectando a que esto sea así.

    		  
       

    		 

      Chiara Gemma, a nome del gruppo ECR. – Signor Presidente, signora Commissaria, onorevoli colleghi, sei ipocondriaca? Hai la soglia del dolore bassa? Non esagerare, che cosa sarà mai?

    Con queste frasi superficiali e offensive si minimizza un problema molto serio, che può diventare addirittura invalidante. L’endometriosi colpisce oltre 14 milioni di donne in Europa e causa dolori pelvici per i quali si fa fatica persino a stare sedute, stanchezza, emicrania e, in alcuni casi, anche infertilità.

    Eppure, c’è chi ancora stenta a credere che si tratti di una patologia invalidante e da prendere in seria considerazione. Se colpisse gli uomini con la stessa incidenza, avremmo già linee guida uniformi, diagnosi tempestive e accesso garantito a cure e tutele lavorative. Per le donne, nulla.

    E allora è tempo che l’Unione europea riconosca l’endometriosi come una priorità di salute pubblica e promuova una strategia europea specifica. Abbiamo bisogno di più ricerca, più formazione per i medici e politiche concrete per il riconoscimento dei diritti delle donne che ne soffrono, anche in ambito lavorativo.

    Non possiamo più lasciare milioni di cittadine nel dolore invisibile. Abbattiamo questo muro di silenzio, qui, in Europa.

    		  
       

    		 

      Billy Kelleher, on behalf of the Renew Group. – Mr President, Commissioner Lahbib, gender inequality in our health system is systemic. It permeates from research through to diagnosis, from treatment to prognosis. There is a lot of research now which identifies the causes, both societal and medical. It is now for us as policymakers to address the root causes of these problems.

    The topic at hand today is endometriosis, a painful, progressive condition that can be debilitating at times and can affect fertility. It can plague women from their first menstrual cycle in their teens to their last menstrual cycle in life. It is estimated that 1 in 10 women, that’s 14 million women in Europe and around 155 000 in Ireland alone. And on average, Commissioner, it takes about eight years for diagnosis. And that is a significant issue in itself alone.

    So there are promising studies taking place in Europe at the moment, including the University College, Cork, University College Dublin, that these studies are making more use of machine learning and AI to find novel ways to identify endometriosis and the means of easing the pain.

    I see four things we should strive for: increase the funding in female‑specific health issues, and identifying the differences in how symptoms present and reactions to treatments and drugs; move away from the male‑centric approach to treatment and listen to women and their experience, give them back control of their health and their treatment; make it not into a postcode lottery ‑ have common guidelines for treatment and for gender‑specific health issues across the EU; and eliminate the taboo, many gender‑specific health issues are mired in stigma and secrecy.

    Society needs to work to eliminate the stigma, and we can start by enshrining sexual and reproductive health rights in the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights.

    Commissioner, I do have to say that I am worried sometimes from the tone of debates in this House and coming from some in the Commission as well, with regard to reproductive and sexual health rights for women. There can be no backsliding on this. There can be no weakening of a fundamental principle that a woman has a choice, and it is non-negotiable from my perspective. And I do find in terms of debates in this House, a disturbing drift to undermine all that we’ve achieved to ensure that women can make that choice.

    From an Irish perspective, we had this debate. We had a debate where we had to move from a very restrictive, aggressive view of a woman’s entitlement to abortion services, where it was completely banned by our Constitution, to a point where we now facilitate and support choice.

    But I do detect at times, particularly in this House and from the right, may I say, that they are trying to undermine and roll back on this, and that I hope the Commission and this Parliament will continue to stand up and vindicate sexual, reproductive and health rights for women across the entirety of the Union and promote and facilitate the basic principle of women having a choice. It is, in my view, a fundamental aspect of what we are as a European Union in terms of ensuring that women are put first and centre in control of their lives.

    So while I support and ensure that we find funding for endometriosis in terms of research, I think the broader issue of ensuring that women are put at the centre of health and sexual‑reproductive rights is a fundamental principle on which I, or my group, will not be bend.

    		  
       

    		 

      Majdouline Sbai, au nom du groupe Verts/ALE. – Monsieur le Président, Madame la Commissaire, chers collègues, une femme sur dix en Europe vit avec l’endométriose. Une femme sur dix souffre donc de douleurs chroniques invalidantes qui entravent sa vie quotidienne, son travail, sa santé mentale. L’endométriose est responsable de 40 % des cas d’infertilité, et pourtant il faut en moyenne sept ans pour obtenir un diagnostic. Sept ans à entendre que «c’est normal», sept ans à se débrouiller avec la souffrance et le silence.

    Non, ce n’est pas «normal»! Imaginez que cette pathologie touche les hommes, que chaque mois ils ressentent des douleurs équivalentes à celles d’un accouchement sans péridurale. Nous aurions eu un grand plan européen, des sommes colossales auraient été investies… Mais voilà, les 10 % d’Européennes concernées n’ont pas eu cette chance.

    Même si, grâce aux associations de patientes, des progrès ont été réalisés, l’avenir ne semble pas plus radieux. En effet, la Commission européenne envisage d’assouplir le contrôle des perturbateurs endocriniens, qui sont présents dans nos produits du quotidien et altèrent le système hormonal des femmes. L’endométriose est un révélateur de nos failles dans l’égalité réelle entre les femmes et les hommes. Je demande à la Commission européenne qu’elle s’exprime en faveur d’une stratégie européenne de lutte contre l’endométriose.

    Madame la Commissaire, imaginez que l’Europe contribue à trouver un traitement pour guérir l’endométriose. Imaginez qu’elle prévienne sa survenue. Imaginez que nous garantissions l’inclusion professionnelle pour les patientes, que nous prenions réellement en charge les soins: nous changerions la vie des Européennes et celle des générations futures!

    		  
       

    		 

      Catarina Martins, em nome do Grupo The Left. – Senhor Presidente, as dores menstruais foram historicamente invisibilizadas. A desvalorização das dores menstruais e da endometriose são mais uma expressão da desigualdade imposta pela sociedade patriarcal, que continua a desvalorizar a saúde das mulheres, e esse preconceito tem de ser combatido. Quando células do tecido endometrial, o tecido que reveste o útero, crescem anormalmente e noutros lugares, a menstruação é dolorosa — nalguns casos uma dor incapacitante. A endometriose é uma doença crónica e debilitante com impactos graves na qualidade de vida, incluindo na liberdade reprodutiva, e só o preconceito explica que continue a ser ignorada.

    Em Portugal, aprovámos uma lei para proteger mulheres nesta situação, garantindo três dias de faltas justificadas e pagas por mês a quem sofra de endometriose e de adenomiose. A lei é recente e as notícias são preocupantes. Não só há empregadores que recusam cumprir a lei, como há médicos que recusam passar a declaração e até escolas que também estão a recusar as declarações para justificar faltas de alunas que sofrem da doença. Uma enorme crueldade, assente em puro preconceito.

    Esse preconceito, infelizmente, estende‑se ainda por toda a Europa. Estima‑se que haverá cerca de 14 milhões de mulheres com endometriose na União Europeia, mas falta financiamento para o seu estudo. Ainda se sabe pouco sobre a doença e sobre como lidar com ela. O diagnóstico chega a demorar sete anos e, mesmo depois de feito, faltam as terapias. Na verdade, falta o reconhecimento do problema. Preconceito, pois. O preconceito patriarcal está presente em tudo, incluindo na saúde. E se hoje começamos a falar sobre esta desigualdade, é graças ao ativismo feminista, que impôs na agenda política o que estava condenado a um muro de silêncio.

    Mas se falamos hoje, temos também de agir. Falta investigação sobre a saúde das mulheres e sobre os seus corpos. O corpo e as condições de saúde dos homens não podem continuar a ser a medida da investigação médica e da prática clínica. Falta reconhecimento e valorização dos sintomas e condições de saúde das mulheres. Falta estabelecer metas concretas para a formação de profissionais de saúde e falta resposta nos sistemas públicos de saúde. Falta educação sexual e para a saúde nas escolas, incluindo educação menstrual. Falta reconhecer a todas as mulheres o direito ao seu corpo e aos cuidados de saúde que necessitem, incluindo o aborto.

    Senhora Comissária, a declaração da Comissão, reconhecendo a necessidade de acordar para a desigualdade de género persistente, também na saúde, é fundamental. Abordar a questão da endometriose é um passo importante e ainda bem que o fazemos hoje, mesmo que já no fim da sessão plenária e com tão pouca gente em Estrasburgo. Mas ainda bem que falamos.

    Mas o outro passo essencial será uma estratégia global para a saúde das mulheres, incluindo o direito à saúde sexual e reprodutiva em todo o espaço da União Europeia. E é para isso que vamos continuar a trabalhar.

    		  
       

    		 

      Tomasz Froelich, im Namen der ESN-Fraktion. – Frau Kommissarin, Herr Präsident! Ich kenne Personen, die an Endometriose leiden – in der Familie und im Freundeskreis. Und als ich mich das erste Mal intensiver mit dieser Krankheit auseinandergesetzt habe, war ich regelrecht schockiert. Bis zu 15 % der Frauen in Europa leiden darunter, also gut jede siebte Frau. Und ja, es ist richtiges Leid: schwere Schmerzen im Beckenbereich, Darmbeschwerden und ein massiv erhöhtes Risiko für Unfruchtbarkeit. Viele Frauen wollen Mütter werden, aber sie können es nicht wegen Endometriose. Aber gibt es etwas Schöneres auf der Welt, als Kinder zu haben? Als stolzer Vater einer kleinen Tochter kann ich Ihnen versichern: Nein, definitiv nicht. Der unerfüllte Kinderwunsch vieler Frauen schlägt oft in psychischen Schmerz über – ich wünsche das wirklich keiner Frau.

    Neben dem individuellen Leid verursacht Endometriose einen enormen volkswirtschaftlichen Schaden. Durch Krankheitsausfall entsteht EU-weit ein Verlust in Höhe von etwa 30 Milliarden Euro. Umso erstaunlicher ist es, dass seit Jahrzehnten so wenig in Endometriose-Forschung investiert wird. In Deutschland beispielsweise waren es bis zum Jahre 2022 über Jahrzehnte hinweg gerade einmal 500 000 Euro. 500 000 Euro über Jahrzehnte hinweg – das ist nichts, wirklich nichts. Danach wurde es zwar etwas mehr, aber immer noch deutlich zu wenig. Vor allem, wenn man bedenkt, für welchen Quatsch die deutsche Bundesregierung sonst so ihr Geld ausgibt. Brüssel macht es übrigens auch nicht wesentlich besser. Nur 0,02 % der geförderten Projekte betreffen Endometriose – viel zu wenig.

    Das ist einfach eine falsche Prioritätensetzung – falsche Prioritätensetzung zulasten wirklicher Probleme von Frauen, zulasten der Gesundheit, zulasten der Demokratie und zulasten der Wirtschaft. Hier muss also ein Umdenken stattfinden, und zwar wirklich über alle politischen Gräben hinweg. Deshalb habe ich auch im Juni eine entsprechende Entschließung hier im EU-Parlament eingereicht, die von Abgeordneten unterschiedlicher Fraktionen unterstützt wurde. Dafür an dieser Stelle mein ausdrücklicher Dank. Und wahrscheinlich war dieser Druck auch notwendig, damit das Parlament diese Debatte endlich auf die Tagesordnung setzt. Richtig so!

    Endometriose-Forschung ist chronisch unterfinanziert. Wir brauchen hier stärkere finanzielle Unterstützung, mehr Forschung, mehr Bewusstsein, mehr Aufklärung. Es ist in unser aller Interesse, und insbesondere die betroffenen Frauen haben das verdient.

    		  
       

    		 

      Sirpa Pietikäinen (PPE). – Arvoisa puhemies, erittäin kivuliaasta ja arkipäivästä elämää haittaavasta elinikäisestä jatkuvasta vaivasta, endometrioosista, kärsii kymmenen prosenttia hedelmällisessä iässä olevista naisista. Sen lisäksi se on merkittävä lapsettomuuden aiheuttaja. Se on alitutkittu, alidiagnostisoitu ja alihoidettu.

    Toivon, että tämä keskustelu todellakin toimii herätyskellona siihen, millainen sukupuolten välinen terveyskuilu meillä on. Naiset käyvät useammin lääkärissä, ovat puolikuntoisempia ja tulevat huonommin hoidetuiksi siksi, että heidän oireitaan tai sairauksiaan ei ymmärretä niin hyvin. Miehet taas käyvät lääkärissä usein liian myöhään ja liian vähän, ja lopputulos on aivan yhtä huono, luonnollisesti heidän kannaltaan.

    Kysymys ei ole siis siitä, kumpia hoidetaan, vaan meidän on hoidettava hyvin sekä miehiä että naisia, eurooppalaisia ihmisiä.

    Siksi toivonkin, että tämä toimii herätyskellona komissiolle ja komissio sitten myös valmistelee jatkossa kokonaisen naisten terveysohjelman, jossa kiinnitetään huomio tarvittavaan lisätutkimukseen eri sairauksien, hoitokeinojen, diagnostisoinnin, lääkärien koulutuksen ja yleisen tietoisuuden herättämisen osalta ja myös lääketutkimuksen osalta, jossa naiset ovat selvästi räikeästi aliedustettuina. Näitä ongelmia emme ratkaise yksin jäsenvaltioissa. Me tarvitsemme yhteistä eurooppalaista tahtoa, ja uskon, että komissiolta tätä myös löytyy.

    		  
       

    		 

      Evelyn Regner (S&D). – Herr Präsident, Frau Kommissarin! Stell dir vor, du hast jeden Monat so starke Schmerzen, dass sie dein Leben bestimmen, und niemand nimmt dich so richtig ernst. So geht es Millionen von Frauen mit Endometriose. 10 % aller Frauen im gebärfähigen Alter sind davon betroffen. Dennoch kennen viele Menschen nicht einmal den Begriff. Der Weg zur Endometriose-Diagnose dauert durchschnittlich sechs Jahre, begleitet von Schmerzen, von Falschdiagnosen und dem Gefühl, nicht so richtig ernst genommen zu werden. Starke Schmerzen während der Periode gelten oftmals als normal. Als Gesellschaft müssen wir umdenken. Schmerzen sind nie normal. Dazu kommt, dass Endometriose einen Kinderwunsch gefährden kann. Einen Lebenstraum, der wie eine Seifenblase platzen kann. All das zeigt ein strukturelles Problem. Frauen und ihre Beschwerden werden im Gesundheitssystem oft nicht ernst genommen. Das ist der Gender Health Gap. Es ist Zeit, ihn zu schließen – mit Forschung, Aufklärungskampagnen und mit echter Gleichstellung in der Medizin.

    (Die Rednerin ist damit einverstanden, auf eine Frage nach dem Verfahren der „blauen Karte“ zu antworten.)

    		  
       

    		 

      Petras Gražulis (ESN), pakėlus mėlynąją kortelę pateiktas klausimas. – Gerbiama pranešėja, aš manau, kad Europos Sąjungoje į visus žmones – vaikus, senelius, vaikus, moteris vyrus, atkreipiamas vienodas dėmesys ir niekas nediskriminuoja. Aš suprantu, kad kiekvienas dar žmogus ir serga įvairiomis ligomis. Ir man keista, kad čia labai skundžiasi moterys. Bet tikrai turėtų būti atkreiptas dėmesys, tikrai turėtų gydyti visas ligas, neišskiriant nei moterų, nei vaikų. Kodėl čia toks atskiras dėmesys? Tuo labiau, kad Jūs anksčiau va kėlėte, kad nėra nei vyrų, nei moterų. Jau dabar daug lyčių.

    		  
       

    		 

      Marie Dauchy (PfE). – Monsieur le Président, elles ne simulent pas, elles hurlent en silence; elles s’effondrent dans les toilettes d’un lycée, sur leur lieu de travail, dans un bus; elles encaissent; elles s’isolent; elles s’en veulent. Non, ce n’est pas dans leur tête. Voilà ce que vivent des millions de femmes atteintes d’endométriose. Parfois, oui, elles finissent par renoncer: à leur emploi, à leur maternité, à leur couple, voire dans certains cas à leur vie. C’est une souffrance invisible mais écrasante, qui se heurte à un mur d’indifférence. Depuis des années, nous avons les chiffres: sept à dix ans de retard de diagnostic, aucun traitement curatif, ce à quoi il faut ajouter les errements médicaux, la culpabilité, l’isolement, etc.

    J’ai moi-même déposé ici, il y a deux ans, une proposition de résolution pour réclamer une stratégie européenne, mais vous l’avez rejetée, en prétextant qu’il s’agissait d’une maladie parmi tant d’autres. Aujourd’hui, M. Froehlich reprend ces constats dans sa résolution, et je salue cette initiative. Mais posons les choses clairement: rien n’a changé. Depuis plus de dix ans, vous empilez les déclarations, les engagements creux, les rapports oubliés dans les tiroirs, mais, dans la vie réelle – celle des femmes, des mères, des jeunes filles –, le quotidien reste un parcours d’obstacles et d’humiliations.

    Vous ne pouvez plus continuer à détourner les yeux, et nous n’allons plus nous contenter d’un mot-dièse une fois par an. Nous réclamons des actions concrètes. Assez de mots: il est temps d’agir pour toutes celles qui souffrent en silence. Il est temps que vous preniez au sérieux la souffrance des femmes!

    		  
       

    		 

      Mariateresa Vivaldini (ECR). – Signor Presidente, signora Commissaria, onorevoli colleghi, in Italia oltre 1,8 milioni di donne in età fertile – 15‑50 anni – hanno una diagnosi confermata di endometriosi, in Europa 14 milioni e quasi 200 milioni nel mondo. Ecco perché dobbiamo iniziare a trattarla come un problema di salute pubblica.

    La malattia colpisce tra il 10 e il 20 % delle donne in età riproduttiva, ma la diagnosi richiede circa otto‑dieci anni, nei quali si hanno conseguenze fisiche, psicologiche, sociali e professionali.

    È anche dimostrato che le donne con endometriosi hanno un aumentato rischio di sviluppare il cancro alle ovaie, alla tiroide e al seno. L’endometriosi è anche causa di infertilità, tranne se la diagnosi è tempestiva, ma le terapie per affrontarla sono, ad oggi, ancora lunghe e costose.

    La mancanza di conoscenza della malattia e la sottovalutazione del dolore espresso dalle donne hanno contribuito a un lungo ritardo nella diagnosi e nella ricerca e a un’assistenza sanitaria inadeguata. L’accesso alle cure è iniquo per le donne che vivono in Stati membri con sistemi sanitari pubblici più deboli o economicamente svantaggiati.

    L’Europa deve pertanto fare di più per colmare l’accesso alle cure e alle terapie nei diversi Stati membri dell’UE, per garantire un’assistenza uniforme e un’alta qualità, implementando i finanziamenti dedicati, come ad esempio TRENDO Project o Horizon Europe.

    Quanto fatto ad oggi, evidentemente, non basta. È necessario intervenire con misure adeguate, non solo per l’impatto fortemente negativo della malattia per la singola persona, ma anche per combattere l’inverno demografico, infatti, il saldo naturale è da anni fortemente negativo.

    		  
       

    		 

      Tilly Metz (Verts/ALE). – Mr President, Madam Commissioner, dear colleagues, today I’m here to speak for millions of women across Europe. Women who have been ignored, misdiagnosed and dismissed for far too long. They are called hypochondriacs, pill poppers, hysterics or attention seekers simply because they are in pain. Real, chronic, paralysing pain.

    Women with endometriosis are told, that’s just the way you are. They are told pain is part of being a woman. They are told to keep on going because suffering has been normalised as feminine, but endometriosis is not an issue to endure. It is a disease, a disease that affects one out of ten women in the EU, a disease that can take up to a decade to diagnose, a disease that has destroyed organs, careers, relationships and lives.

    We face a gender‑health gap that is killing trust, delaying treatment, and violating the rights of women. The pain of women has been underestimated, pathologised and ignored simply because it is felt by women. There is not enough attention for endometriosis. Not enough research funding goes to women’s health research in general.

    For far too long, research has concentrated on male bodies. We must change that. It is changing already, but not fast enough. We call for investment in research both on diagnosis and treatment, but also on awareness raising about women’s health.

    		  
       

    		 

      Günther Sidl (S&D). – Herr Präsident, geschätzte Frau Kommissarin! Wir reden heute über die bessere Behandlung von Endometriose und in Wahrheit reden wir dabei gleichzeitig über ein tiefgreifendes Problem in unserer Gesundheitsversorgung. Unser Gesundheitssystem ist auf einem Auge ziemlich blind, nämlich auf dem Auge, das die weibliche Perspektive in der Medizin sehen sollte. Das kommt davon, weil wir die medizinische Sehschärfe bis jetzt immer nur auf den Prototyp Mann abgestimmt haben.

    Eine Medizin, die nicht erkennt, dass es unterschiedliche Ansätze braucht, um den Bedürfnissen von Frauen und Männern gerecht zu werden, wird am Ende gar keinem wirklich gerecht. Hier braucht es aber auch unter Männern eine noch viel stärkere Sensibilität. Jede Initiative, die dazu einen Beitrag liefert, ist herzlich willkommen.

    Entscheidend ist auch, dass wir als Parlament gemeinsam mit der EU-Kommission weiter Initiativen für mehr Forschung zur Endometriose setzen, auch in Zeiten von engen Budgetrahmen. Es gibt leider noch immer zu viele offene Fragen. Wir haben hier wirklich eine sehr große Verantwortung.

    		  
       

    		 

      Maria Grapini (S&D). – Domnule președinte, doamnă comisar, stimați colegi, sigur, dezbatem, așa cum spunea colegul meu, poate prea târziu. Și în ultima zi a plenarei noastre.

    Dar trebuie să punem odată la punct această problemă. Este o boală ignorată de prea mult timp, doamnă comisar. Și îmi amintesc că în 2023 am adresat scrisori și întrebări cu solicitare de răspuns oral Comisiei. Totuși, milioane de femei trăiesc în tăcere, fără diagnostic, fără tratament adecvat. Această lipsă de recunoaștere arată clar cât de profund este decalajul de gen în cercetare, finanțare și în prioritățile politicilor publice de sănătate.

    Eu cred că nu se mai poate ignora această realitate și avem nevoie de investiții în cercetare specifică pe sănătatea femeilor, formare medicală care să includă în mod serios bolile ginecologice. Simptomele, știți bine, sunt și la alte boli și de multe ori nu se cunosc. Apoi, educație sanitară. Femeile, mai ales în mediul rural, să poată să știe că trebuie să meargă. Prevenția este totdeauna mai bună decât tratamentul. Din păcate, această boală duce și la infertilitate și știm bine ce decalaj demografic, ce cădere demografică avem în Uniunea Europeană.

    Doamnă comisar, eu m-aș bucura dacă ne-ați da un răspuns. Concret, ce măsuri putem lua? Parlamentul European a calculat costuri de 30 de miliarde de euro pe concedii medicale. Și nu e vorba atât de problema banilor, cât de problema infertilității, suferinței femeilor. De aceea, vă rog, doamnă comisar, veniți către Parlament cu niște răspunsuri concrete. Ce măsuri vrem să luăm pentru această boală a femeilor, femei care suferă de mult timp în tăcere?

    		  
       

    		 

      Hadja Lahbib, Member of the Commission. – Mr President, honourable Members, thank you for this debate. It may be late, but let’s say that we keep the best for the end.

    I would like to say, first of all, that I’m glad to see so many men taking the floor with passion and awareness. Thank you Mr Kelleher and thank you Mr Andriukaitis for your awareness. I’m glad also to see that we all share a common starting point, because indeed it concerns all of us, not only women. We want to ease the burden of non-communicable diseases, we want to improve health equity and better address specific matters of women’s health, and we want to give citizens a better quality of life.

    The Commission is fully committed to these goals, as we build a strong European health union that supports every citizen. We can invest in support and early diagnosis, we can invest in high-quality treatments and in training and educating health professionals, and we will continue working towards lifelong prevention and pursuing innovation in health, because, indeed, health is one of the most important treasures in our life. And yet, in recent years, it is becoming increasingly clear that we often overlook differences between women and men when it comes to research, treatments, medical care and medical conditions. Biological differences that affect diagnosis, response to treatment or to rehabilitation have been completely Ignored. Women have been excluded as research subjects, for instance, for reasons related to hormonal cycles, which would entail a potential unpredictability of the results.

    That is why principle 2 of the roadmap for women’s rights focuses on ensuring the highest standards of physical and mental health for women. It promotes that a gender lens should be embedded in all health policies and actions, and this means the promotion of gender-sensitive medical research, clinical trials, diagnostics and treatments, and a systematic collection of sex-disaggregated data.

    The roadmap furthermore commits to supporting and complementing the health action by the Member States regarding women’s access to sexual and reproductive health and rights in full respect of the Treaties. This includes respectful and high-quality obstetric, gynaecological, antenatal, childbirth and postnatal care, free from discrimination and combating harmful practices.

    This roadmap, as you know, will pave the way for the next gender equality strategy to be adopted ahead of International Women’s Day next year. It will be an excellent opportunity to develop concrete actions and measures that promote fairness and inclusion in health policy and contribute to creating this European health union. I look forward to receiving the European Parliament’s input on this matter. Let’s keep up this important work together.

    		  
       

    		 

      Le Président. – Le débat est clos.

    		  

    11. Oral explanations of vote (Rule 201)

    		 

      Le Président. – L’ordre du jour appelle à présent les explications de vote.

    		  

    		 

      Cristian Terheş (ECR). – Domnule președinte, am semnat și am votat în favoarea moțiunii de demitere a Ursulei von der Leyen, pentru că și ea, asemenea oricărui oficial public, trebuie să răspundă pentru acțiunile sale contrare interesului public din perioada pandemiei COVID.

    Aceasta a susținut în pandemie, ca președintă a Comisiei Europene, că produsele medicale etichetate ca vaccinuri ar fi fost, citez, „sigure și eficiente”, lucru neadevărat. În privința eficacității, cu toții am văzut că acestea nu au oprit reinfectarea și transmisia virusului, persoane injectate cu aceste produse medicale reinfectându-se și transmițând virusul. Mai mult chiar, Pfizer a recunoscut în acest Parlament că ei nici nu au testat dacă produsul lor oprește transmisia virusului.

    Referitor la siguranța acestor produse medicale, zeci de mii de europeni au murit spontan la scurt timp după injectare, după cum arată statisticile EMA. Alte foarte multe persoane au complicații și probleme de sănătate după ce s-au injectat, lucru recunoscut de tot mai multe studii.

    Contractele pentru achizițiile acestor pretinse vaccinuri conțin clauze încă nepublice, astfel încât cei care suferă după vaccinuri nu știu pe cine să tragă la răspundere. Pentru aceste abuzuri, Ursula von der Leyen trebuie să răspundă.

    		  

    11.2. Tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictions (RC-B10-0324/2025)

    		 

      Le Président. – Ce point de l’ordre du jour est clos.

    		  

    12. Explanations of votes in writing (Rule 201)

       

    (Les explications de vote données par écrit figurent sur les pages réservées aux députés sur le site internet du Parlement.)

    		  

    13. Approval of the minutes of the sitting and forwarding of texts adopted

    		 

      Le Président. – Le procès-verbal de la présente séance sera soumis à l’approbation du Parlement au début de la prochaine séance. S’il n’y a pas d’objection, je transmettrai dès à présent à leurs destinataires les résolutions adoptées au cours de la séance d’aujourd’hui.

    		  

    14. Dates of the next part-session

    		 

      Le Président. – La prochaine période de session aura lieu du 8 au 11 septembre 2025 à Strasbourg. À chacune et à chacun d’entre vous je souhaite de bonnes vacances et j’adresse également mes remerciements à toutes celles et à tous ceux qui ont assuré le bon fonctionnement de notre session.

    		  

    15. Closure of the sitting

       

    (La séance est levée à 15:47)

    		  

    16. Adjournment of the session

    		 

      Le Président. – Je déclare interrompue la session du Parlement européen. La séance est levée.

    		  

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Economics: Isabel Schnabel: Interview with Econostream Media

    Source: European Central Bank

    Interview with Isabel Schnabel, Member of the Executive Board of the ECB, conducted by David Barwick and Marta Vilar on 9 July 2025

    11 July 2025

    Ms Schnabel, abstracting from the still-open question of tariffs, would you say that developments since 5 June support the idea that the ECB is in a good place, weakening the case for another move?

    Yes, we are in a good place. Disinflation is proceeding broadly as expected, even if services inflation and food inflation remain somewhat elevated. We are now close to having successfully tackled past inflation shocks, which is good news. Over the medium term, inflation is projected to be at 2% and inflation expectations are well anchored. In view of this, our interest rates are also in a good place, and the bar for another rate cut is very high.

    Let me explain. First, I see no risk of a sustained undershooting of inflation over the medium term. Core inflation is projected to be at target over the entire projection horizon. The low energy price inflation is likely to be temporary, and the fear of the exchange rate appreciation putting downward pressure on underlying inflation is exaggerated in my view, as the pass-through is likely to be limited. In fact, this appreciation also reflects the new growth narrative in Europe, meaning there is a positive confidence effect, which attracts capital and lowers financing costs.

    Second, the economy is proving resilient. Economic growth in the first quarter of 2025 was better than expected. Sentiment indicators have also surprised to the upside – the composite Purchasing Managers’ Index rose again in June. And it’s noteworthy that manufacturing has continued to improve, with, strikingly, all the forward-looking indicators having continued their upward trend – new orders, new export orders, future output are all at three-year highs. This suggests that we’re seeing more than just frontloading. Moreover, the labour market remains resilient, with unemployment at a record low and employment continuing to grow. It seems that the uncertainty is weighing less on economic activity than we thought, and on top of that, we’re expecting a large fiscal impulse that will further support the economy. So overall, the risks to the growth outlook in the euro area are now more balanced.

    It sounds like you see no grounds for the ECB to seriously consider further easing, even if it were to wait before moving again.

    There would only be a case for another rate cut if we saw signs of a material deviation of inflation from our target over the medium term. And at the moment, I see no signs of that.

    Is the potential cost of an unnecessary cut high enough to outweigh risk management arguments for a so-called insurance cut?

    I don’t think that risk management considerations can justify another rate cut. Domestic inflation is still elevated and inflation expectations of households and firms are tilted to the upside. Additionally, a more fragmented global economy and a large fiscal impulse pose upside risks to the inflation outlook over the medium term. Therefore, from today’s perspective, a further rate cut is not appropriate.

    I would also warn against fine-tuning monetary policy to incoming data. For example, it would be risky to base a monetary policy decision solely on the evolution of energy prices, because we’ve seen oil prices fluctuate between USD 60 and almost USD 80 since March alone. We should remain firmly focused on the medium term and on core inflation. This is also in line with our updated monetary policy strategy, which says that we need to be agile to recognise fundamental changes in the inflation environment, but that we can tolerate moderate deviations from target if there’s no risk of a de-anchoring of inflation expectations.

    We don’t yet know the final tariff outcome, but observers expect Europe to get away with a general 10%, along with individual tariffs on certain sectors and some exceptions for others. If you share this view, what impact on growth and inflation do you expect?

    Indeed, it looks like tariff negotiations are moving towards our baseline scenario. But of course, there remains uncertainty about the outcome of the negotiations. Tariffs have a dampening effect on economic activity in the short run. However, if the negotiations are concluded successfully, this will lower uncertainty, which would support consumption and investment.

    As regards inflation, I see a net inflationary effect over the medium term, because the dampening effect from a weaker global economy and potential trade diversion is likely to be offset – or even overcompensated – by supply-side effects, which are not included in our standard projection models. This includes cost-push shocks rippling through global value chains, supply chain disruptions and the loss of efficiency from a more fragmented world.

    You said the bar for another rate cut is very high. Is that because we’re approaching accommodative territory? Or are we already in it?

    I think we are becoming accommodative. If you look at the latest bank lending survey, you see 56% of banks reporting that interest rates are boosting the demand for mortgages, while only 8% say they’re holding demand back. Moreover, the natural rate of interest may have increased recently due to the historic shift in German fiscal policy. This is also reflected in financial markets, where real forward rates have moved up, which reflects the expected higher demand for capital, including from the private sector. That means that, for a given level of the policy rate, our policy becomes more accommodative. And this is what’s also reflected in the pick-up in bank lending.

    What other indicators do you rely on to gauge your level of accommodation?

    We look at general economic developments, which also reflect the restrictiveness of our monetary policy. And as I said, the economy has proven more resilient than we had thought.

    You described the pass-through of the EUR/USD exchange rate as limited. Can you be more specific? Is there a point at which this suddenly changes?

    I find the debate about the exchange rate appreciation exaggerated. I do not remember people having a similar concern when the exchange rate was moving towards parity in early 2025. And this did not prevent us from cutting rates further. If you take a longer perspective and look at the past two decades, we’ve had comparable or even larger appreciations with a rather limited impact on inflation.

    There are reasons to believe that the pass-through may be limited this time as well, especially to underlying inflation. First, the source of the shock matters. In this case, the stronger exchange rate is also a reflection of a positive confidence effect and investors’ belief that the euro area’s growth potential may be higher than thought. Moreover, you see a rebalancing of investors into the euro area, which tends to lower financing costs, counteracting the tightening effect of the exchange rate.

    Second, more than half of our imports are invoiced in euro, which reduces the pass-through. Firms may also use the occasion of lower import costs to protect their profit margins rather than pass these lower costs on to consumers.

    Finally, the impact of the exchange rate on competitiveness and foreign demand is mitigated by the high import content of our exports.

    But to get back to your second question, we do not target the exchange rate and we do not respond to any particular exchange rate level. Exchange rates enter our projection models via the assumptions, and we know that they can change in either direction at any point.

    So further appreciation is manageable indefinitely, as long as it remains reasonably gradual?

    We always have to monitor what is happening. I don’t like to make very general statements about what could happen. At the moment, it’s manageable.

    You recently said that the estimate of the impact of higher fiscal spending incorporated into the projections is “relatively conservative”. What’s being underappreciated? Is it the timing? The composition of the spending?

    I see several aspects. The first is indeed timing. We’ve been positively surprised by the frontloading of spending plans by the German government. It seems they’re determined to deliver on their promises. The second aspect is fiscal multipliers. They could be higher than assumed depending on how the money is spent. Generally, they tend to be higher when the money is spent for investment. And the details of defence expenditures also matter: what share is going to be sourced domestically, and what share is used for R&D-related expenditures? A third, very important point is that our models may not fully capture the complementarity between public and private investment – that is, that private investment is being crowded in by public investment. Just recently, a group of large German corporations announced that they are planning a large investment programme, which would amplify the positive effect of public spending.

    How much potential do you see for a stronger-than-anticipated fiscal impulse to alter the inflation outlook and thus your policy calibration in the second half of this year?

    The fiscal measures are going to play out mainly over the medium term, not the short term. But inflation could eventually pick up if the economy hits capacity constraints, also due to demographic developments, which will accelerate over the coming years.

    Your remarks seem to confirm that the ECB is not unhappy about the fact that the US dollar has been weak. Do you see a risk that the public discussion could provoke a US reaction the ECB needs to worry about?

    The current situation risks undermining the exorbitant privilege of the US dollar, a privilege the United States has enjoyed over many decades, which has led to lower financing costs for American households, firms and the government. This offers a historical chance for the euro area to foster the international role of the euro as a global reserve, invoicing and funding currency, to reap some of those benefits. But there are three important prerequisites. The first is a revival of euro area growth. The second is safeguarding the rule of law and security, including in military terms. And the third is a large and liquid EU bond market.

    On the savings and investment union, how can the ECB – while staying within its mandate – play a stronger role in highlighting how structural inefficiencies in cross-border capital flows impede monetary policy transmission and private risk sharing?

    We’ve been very vocal about the savings and investment union. The President has given several speeches and the Governing Council has issued its own communication on the topic. This is because integration is closely related to our mandate. Our monetary policy is more effective in an integrated market. Integration improves monetary policy transmission by increasing private risk sharing and fostering convergence. This is firmly within our mandate. But let me also stress that the savings and investment union is about more than financial integration. It’s about fostering innovation and economic growth. This concerns not just the availability of capital, especially risk capital, but also the possibility for firms to scale up within the Single Market. We know that the internal hurdles within the Single Market are very high – some estimates show they’re much higher than the tariffs that we may be facing from the United States. So, one important part of the savings and investment union is to reduce these barriers within the Single Market. I think the 28th regime for innovative companies is a very promising proposal to allow those companies to scale up easily all over Europe. The ECB can only inform the debate through speeches and analysis, but in the end, progress will depend on the political will of governments.

    Back to the United States, where Donald Trump is calling daily on Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell to resign. In the past 24 hours, we’ve had new speculation about who the next Fed Chair might be. Even if Powell stays to the end of his term, there could be an announcement long before that, and his intended successor may start to make public pronouncements about his intentions that lead to market repricing and an even stronger euro. Does this worry you – and more broadly, are you concerned about any other changes that could disadvantage Europe if a more “Trumpy” Fed Chair emerges?

    The current discussion is testimony to the importance of central bank independence, and the Federal Reserve is leading by example. It’s very dangerous when you have direct interference by governments in monetary policy, because this can destroy the trust that has been built over decades. One concrete advantage of independence is that it reduces risk premia. By challenging Fed independence, risk premia may move up, which would increase rather than lower interest rates. Overall, I would never underestimate the institutional resilience of the Fed, so I remain optimistic.

    Does this optimism also reflect the fact that you just had the opportunity to speak with Chair Powell at the ECB Forum on Central Banking in Sintra, Portugal?

    Absolutely.

    As excess liquidity continues to decline, are you observing any emerging signs of segmentation, whether across jurisdictions or across bank tiers, in the transmission of short-term interest rates?

    There are no signs of segmentation. In fact, with quantitative tightening (QT) proceeding, market functioning has improved because collateral scarcity has gone down. Our new operational framework can deal very well with the heterogeneity across the euro area. Any bank can access our operations at any time, at the same rate, for the amount that they need, based on a broad set of eligible collateral. So far, the banks’ recourse to our operations has been rather limited because excess liquidity is still abundant, and that is also reflected in market funding being more favourable than our operations. Over time, excess liquidity is going to go down, and eventually the situation will change and more and more banks will access our operations. We are observing that process very carefully.

    Even if market function still appears smooth, are there any early indicators you’re watching especially closely?

    We are closely monitoring the functioning of money markets, and we have a whole range of indicators for that, but at the moment, we don’t have any concerns.

    On a related subject, as balance sheet reduction continues, do you see any risk that at some point it could impair monetary policy transmission or disrupt market functioning?

    Not at all. It’s important to understand the functioning of our operational framework, which is designed in a way that ensures smooth monetary policy transmission. In line with our decision, the monetary policy bond portfolios under the asset purchase programme (APP) and the pandemic emergency purchase programme (PEPP) are going to be run down to zero. At some point, once the ECB balance sheet is growing again, we will provide a significant part of banks’ structural liquidity needs via structural operations, namely longer-term lending operations and a structural bond portfolio. But these are distinct from quantitative easing (QE), which remains a tool for exceptional circumstances that is going to be used more sparingly in the future.

    With sovereign spreads generally contained for now, do you view the current pace of the APP rundown as appropriate?

    Yes. It’s running smoothly in the background and our experience with our gradual and predictable approach has been very positive.

    What could trigger a change in the pace?

    To change the pace of QT, you would need to have a monetary policy argument. And we said that our unconventional tools are to be used when we are near the effective lower bound, based on a comprehensive cost-benefit analysis. This is not our situation today. Hence, the plan is to run down the monetary policy bond portfolios to zero. The provision of liquidity for the implementation of our monetary policy won’t be done via QE – which is a stance instrument – but rather via our weekly lending operations and, at a later stage, the structural operations, once excess liquidity has declined to the point where demand for additional central bank liquidity begins to rise.

    The time lag between the cut-off date for the technical assumptions and the publication of the projections is quite long, and in this volatile world it seems that this delay could compromise the reliability of the projections. Is this approach still justified?

    This lag is mainly due to organisational reasons, especially when we are running the projection exercise together with the entire Eurosystem. There is a huge machinery to be managed, with many people to be coordinated, and the outcome then has to be incorporated into the material sent to the Governing Council. The timelines are already very tight. But more fundamentally, your question reveals a common misunderstanding about our projections. In the strategy assessment, we stressed the importance of the uncertainty surrounding our baseline projections. This uncertainty stems from the assumptions, and it also comes from more fundamental uncertainty, like the outcome of tariff negotiations. But it’s a mistake to focus only on the point estimates. What the projections give you is not just this number – which is almost certainly wrong and may change from day to day – but a range of plausible outcomes. This range is what we should focus on, because the point estimates alone may be misleading if you do not also consider the uncertainty.

    To what extent is the return to 2% inflation in 2027 contingent on regulatory measures like the EU’s new emissions trading system ETS2, and does this raise credibility risks if those inputs prove unreliable?

    In general, projecting energy prices is complicated. We are using futures prices in our staff projections even though they are not necessarily a good predictor of energy prices. Here we have an additional complication in that the new ETS has its own uncertainties, such as when it will come and how large its effects are going to be. And this brings me back to the point that we should focus on core inflation, acknowledging that whatever happens with respect to energy – as we’ve seen in the recent inflation surge – may feed into core inflation, especially when prices rise.

    In concluding the strategy assessment, the ECB committed to act forcefully or persistently in response to large, sustained inflation deviations. What criteria would lead you to conclude that it’s appropriate to act forcefully or persistently?

    The strategy assessment implies that we can tolerate moderate deviations from our inflation target as long as inflation expectations are firmly anchored. But when we see a risk of a sustained deviation from the target in either direction that could de-anchor inflation expectations, we will act appropriately forcefully or persistently, depending on the situation at hand and based on a comprehensive cost-benefit analysis. What this means is that first, we have to be agile in order to detect a fundamental shift in the inflation environment. We were lacking this agility at the time of the recent inflation surge, as it took us some time to recognise that we had shifted very quickly from a low-inflation environment to a high-inflation one. We want to be more agile to be able to react to such a change more rapidly. Second, we have to pay a lot of attention to inflation expectations – not just market-based inflation expectations, because these may be subject to a “monkey-in-the-mirror” problem and may merely reflect our own thinking. It’s important to look at a broad set of indicators, including household and firm inflation expectations. And in fact, if you look at the Consumer Expectations Survey, you see that household inflation expectations reacted relatively early to the change in the inflation environment. So, this can give us useful signals.

    And the word “sustained” means extending into the medium term?

    I’m always talking about the medium term, as this is what matters for our monetary policy. But sustained means that it’s not just temporary, and we all know that it’s difficult to judge whether something is temporary or not, but we will have to deal with that in the future.

    In the wake of the strategy assessment, does anything change about the weights you attach to model-based outputs, your judgement or real-time indicators?

    What I think is changing is our approach to data dependence. Over the past few years, data dependence played a very important role: the incoming data served as a cross-check to verify whether the data were in line with the projected decline in inflation over time. This allowed us to cut interest rates at a time when domestic inflation was still elevated. Now we’ve entered a new phase in which we are using incoming data to assess whether there could be a sustained deviation of inflation from target over the medium term. Scenario analysis helps us to navigate the uncertainty that we are facing, and the incoming data can tell us which scenario is most likely to materialise. Of course, projection models have their shortcomings, and we have to continuously improve the models, as we’ve done over recent years. For example, in our analysis of the impact of tariffs on economic activity, trade policy uncertainty played a very important role, but now we’re seeing that the economy is more resilient than we expected. This could be an indication that the impact of trade policy uncertainty is smaller than thought. Another example is the modelling of the supply-side effects of tariffs, which are currently not in our projection models.

    How do you evaluate the prospects for Germany to emerge from the economic doldrums?

    Germany has been facing severe structural weaknesses and a loss in competitiveness. To escape stagnation, it will have to implement growth-enhancing policies. The fiscal package is one important ingredient. But just spending money will not be enough. First, you have to make sure that the money is spent wisely, meaning on investment, not consumption. Second, the spending has to be accompanied by comprehensive structural reforms, including of the social security system, especially given demographic developments. We see a clear turnaround in sentiment in the German economy. But now the German government has to deliver. I see a chance to escape low growth, and this chance should not be wasted.

    So, you share the optimism expressed by Bundesbank President Joachim Nagel earlier this week?

    Yes, I’m also optimistic.

    And with regard to the change in the German attitude towards fiscal spending, what do you think the implications are for euro area growth and inflation?

    Germany is in a situation in which it can expand its government spending, because it has fiscal space. If done properly, this can help increase potential growth, which would also have positive spillovers to the rest of the euro area. This may go along with higher interest rate costs, but if potential growth increases at the same time, this is manageable.

    Traditionally, we’ve had the core, rather fiscally conservative countries of the euro area on the one hand, and the more fiscally relaxed periphery countries on the other. Do you see this division being blurred as a consequence of the new German fiscal attitude?

    Germany is in a very different position from countries like France and Italy. Those countries are facing much more difficult decisions. When they want to increase defence spending as foreseen, they will have to reduce their spending elsewhere, which is politically very demanding. So, I think the difference in the fiscal situations is still there.

    When you speak publicly, how do you balance your own preferences and own views with the need to represent the ECB and its institutional interests?

    One always has to strike the right balance, but I believe that the transparency about the diversity of views within the Governing Council is a feature, not a bug. It enhances our credibility. It also helps market participants better understand the discussions in the Governing Council and detect certain shifts in policies before the decision has been taken. That ultimately helps the transmission of our monetary policy. I have always been loyal to our collegial decisions, and I try to explain their rationale in public. But of course, when I see important new narratives that are relevant for the monetary policy discussion, I express my views. I explain them in comprehensive speeches based on empirical analysis, and I hope that that helps the debate.

    MIL OSI Economics –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Highlights – ENVI exchange of views on 2040 climate target proposal – Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety

    Source: European Parliament

    On 14 July 2025, ENVI will hold an exchange of views on the Commission’s proposal to amend the European Climate Law by setting a 2040 target of 90% net GHG emissions reduction compared to 1990 levels

    On 2 July 2025, the Commission presented a proposal to amend the European Climate Law, introducing an EU 2040 climate target to reduce net GHG emissions by 90% compared to 1990 levels. This target builds on the EU 2030 climate target of at least 55% GHG emissions reduction and sets the pathway to reach climate neutrality by 2050. The proposal introduces the possibility to use flexibilities in how the target can be met, such as the potential use of high-quality international carbon credits from 2036, inclusion of domestic permanent removals in the EU ETS, and cross-sectoral compensation mechanisms. It also outlines enabling conditions to ensure industrial competitiveness, fairness, and technological neutrality. National specificities, simplicity, and cost-effectiveness are to be taken into account. Kurt Vandenberghe, Director General of DG CLIMA, will present the proposal in ENVI on 14 July.

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Minutes – Thursday, 10 July 2025 – Strasbourg – Final edition

    Source: European Parliament 2

    PV-10-2025-07-10

    EN

    EN

    iPlPv_Sit

    Minutes
    Thursday, 10 July 2025 – Strasbourg

    IN THE CHAIR: Christel SCHALDEMOSE
    Vice-President

    1. Opening of the sitting

    The sitting opened at 09:00.



    2. Council positions at first reading (Rule 64)

    – Position of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2008/98/EC on waste – Adopted by the Council on 23 June 2025 (06978/2/2025 – COM(2025)0388 – C10-0139/2025 – 2023/0234(COD))
    referred to committee responsible: ENVI

    The three-month period available to Parliament under Article 294 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union for it to adopt its position would begin the following day, 11 July 2025.



    3. Post-2027 common agricultural policy (debate)

    Commission statement: Post-2027 common agricultural policy (2025/2791(RSP))

    Christophe Hansen (Member of the Commission) made the statement.

    The following spoke: Herbert Dorfmann, on behalf of the PPE Group, Dario Nardella, on behalf of the S&D Group (the President reminded the speaker of the rules on conduct), Raffaele Stancanelli, on behalf of the PfE Group, Carlo Fidanza, on behalf of the ECR Group, Elsi Katainen, on behalf of the Renew Group, Thomas Waitz, on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group, Luke Ming Flanagan, on behalf of The Left Group, Arno Bausemer, on behalf of the ESN Group, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Cristina Maestre, Mathilde Androuët, Veronika Vrecionová, Barry Cowen, Anna Strolenberg, Arash Saeidi, Sarah Knafo, Katarína Roth Neveďalová, Siegfried Mureşan, André Rodrigues, Mireia Borrás Pabón, who also answered a blue-card question from Ana Miranda Paz, Bert-Jan Ruissen, Asger Christensen, Giuseppe Antoci, David Cormand, Norbert Lins, Camilla Laureti, Gilles Pennelle, Waldemar Buda, Christine Singer, who also answered a blue-card question from Arkadiusz Mularczyk, Cristina Guarda, Konstantinos Arvanitis, Daniel Buda, Vytenis Povilas Andriukaitis, Valérie Deloge, Benoit Cassart, Martin Häusling, Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral, Maria Grapini, Ton Diepeveen, Jacek Ozdoba, Ciaran Mullooly, Pär Holmgren, Péter Magyar, Marko Vešligaj, Barbara Bonte, Michal Wiezik, Jessika Van Leeuwen, Csaba Dömötör and Céline Imart.

    The following spoke under the catch-the-eye procedure: Gabriel Mato, Sebastian Tynkkynen, Ana Miranda Paz, Maria Zacharia, Nina Carberry and Arkadiusz Mularczyk.

    IN THE CHAIR: Pina PICIERNO
    Vice-President

    The following spoke under the catch-the-eye procedure: Francisco José Millán Mon, Maria Walsh, Stefan Köhler and Lefteris Nikolaou-Alavanos.

    The following spoke: Christophe Hansen.

    The debate closed.



    4. European Citizens’ Initiative ‘Cohesion policy for the equality of the regions and sustainability of the regional cultures’ (debate)

    European Citizens’ Initiative ‘Cohesion policy for the equality of the regions and sustainability of the regional cultures’ (2025/2655(RSP)) (Rule 228(8))

    Francesco Ventola and Bogdan Rzońca presented the European Citizens’ Initiative.

    The following spoke: Hadja Lahbib (Member of the Commission).

    The following spoke: Iuliu Winkler, on behalf of the PPE Group, Alex Agius Saliba, on behalf of the S&D Group, Kinga Gál, on behalf of the PfE Group, Antonella Sberna, on behalf of the ECR Group, Raquel García Hermida-Van Der Walle, on behalf of the Renew Group, Vladimir Prebilič, on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group, Siegbert Frank Droese, on behalf of the ESN Group, Gabriella Gerzsenyi, Marcos Ros Sempere, André Rougé, who also answered a blue-card question from Raquel García Hermida-Van Der Walle, Guillaume Peltier, Joachim Streit, Kathleen Funchion, Volker Schnurrbusch, Fidias Panayiotou, Daniel Buda, Hannes Heide, Rody Tolassy, Nora Junco García, Irmhild Boßdorf, who also answered a blue-card question from Arkadiusz Mularczyk, Rosa Estaràs Ferragut, Sabrina Repp, Alexandra Mehnert, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Loránt Vincze, Isilda Gomes, Łukasz Kohut, Sandra Gómez López, Andi Cristea and Sofie Eriksson.

    The following spoke under the catch-the-eye procedure: Gabriel Mato, Viktória Ferenc, Arkadiusz Mularczyk, Oihane Agirregoitia Martínez, Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă, Nikolina Brnjac and Sebastian Tynkkynen.

    The following spoke: Hadja Lahbib.

    The debate closed.

    (The sitting was suspended at 11:51.)



    IN THE CHAIR: Roberta METSOLA
    President

    5. Resumption of the sitting

    The sitting resumed at 12:00.

    ⁂

    The President thanked the Members and Parliament’s staff for their work during the first year of the current parliamentary term.



    6. Voting time

    For detailed results of the votes, see also ‘Results of votes’ and ‘Results of roll-call votes’.



    6.1. Motion of censure on the Commission (vote)

    Motion of censure on the Commission B10-0319/2025 (minutes of 10.7.2025, item I) (2025/2140(RSP))

    (Majority of two thirds of the votes cast, constituting a majority of Parliament’s component Members)

    MOTION OF CENSURE (Rule 131)

    Rejected

    (‘Results of votes’, item 1)

    ⁂

    Özlem Demirel, on the admissibility of an amendment concerning one of the items in voting time (the President gave explanations).



    6.2. Case of Ryan Cornelius in Dubai (vote)

    Motions for resolutions RC-B10-0328/2025 (minutes of 10.7.2025, item I), B10-0328/2025, B10-0333/2025, B10-0336/2025, B10-0340/2025 and B10-0341/2025 (minutes of 9.7.2025, item I) (2025/2796(RSP))

    (Majority of the votes cast)

    JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION

    Adopted (P10_TA(2025)0161)

    (‘Results of votes’, item 2)



    6.3. Arbitrary arrest and torture of Belgian-Portuguese researcher Joseph Figueira Martin in the Central African Republic (vote)

    Motions for resolutions RC-B10-0327/2025 (minutes of 10.7.2025, item I), B10-0323/2025, B10-0327/2025, B10-0334/2025, B10-0339/2025 and B10-0342/2025 (minutes of 9.7.2025, item I) (2025/2797(RSP))

    (Majority of the votes cast)

    JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION

    Adopted (P10_TA(2025)0162)

    (Motion for a resolution B10-0323/2025 fell.)

    (‘Results of votes’, item 3)



    6.4. Urgent need to protect religious minorities in Syria following the recent terrorist attack on Mar Elias Church in Damascus (vote)

    Motions for resolutions RC-B10-0335/2025 (minutes of 10.7.2025, item I), B10-0325/2025, B10-0335/2025, B10-0338/2025, B10-0343/2025, B10-0344/2025, B10-0345/2025, B10-0346/2025 and B10-0347/2025 (minutes of 9.7.2025, item I) (2025/2798(RSP))

    (Majority of the votes cast)

    JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION

    Adopted (P10_TA(2025)0163)

    (Motions for resolutions B10-0325/2025, B10-0338/2025 and B10-0343/2025 fell.)

    (‘Results of votes’, item 4)



    6.5. Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 as regards obligations of economic operators concerning battery due diligence policies ***I (vote)

    Report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 as regards obligations of economic operators concerning battery due diligence policies [COM(2025)0258 – C10-0089/2025 – 2025/0129(COD)] – Committee on the Environment, Climate and Food Safety. Rapporteur: Antonio Decaro (A10-0134/2025)

    (Majority of the votes cast)

    COMMISSION PROPOSAL and AMENDMENTS

    Approved (P10_TA(2025)0164)

    Parliament’s first reading thus closed.

    (‘Results of votes’, item 5)



    6.6. Future of the EU biotechnology and biomanufacturing sector: leveraging research, boosting innovation and enhancing competitiveness (vote)

    Report on the future of the EU biotechnology and biomanufacturing sector: leveraging research, boosting innovation and enhancing competitiveness [2025/2008(INI)] – Committee on Industry, Research and Energy. Rapporteur: Hildegard Bentele (A10-0123/2025)

    (Majority of the votes cast)

    MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION

    Adopted (P10_TA(2025)0165)

    The following had spoken:

    Hildegard Bentele, before the vote, to make a statement pursuant to Rule 165(4).

    (‘Results of votes’, item 6)



    6.7. Tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictions (vote)

    Motions for resolutions RC-B10-0324/2025/REV1, B10-0324/2025, B10-0326/2025, B10-0329/2025, B10-0330/2025, B10-0331/2025 and B10-0332/2025 (minutes of 10.7.2025, item I) (2025/2800(RSP))

    (Majority of the votes cast)

    JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION

    Adopted (P10_TA(2025)0166)

    (Motion for a resolution B10-0326/2025 fell.)

    (‘Results of votes’, item 7)

    (The sitting was suspended at 12:18.)



    IN THE CHAIR: Younous OMARJEE
    Vice-President

    7. Resumption of the sitting

    The sitting resumed at 15:00.



    8. Approval of the minutes of the previous sitting

    The minutes of the previous sitting were approved.



    9. Composition of committees and delegations

    The non-attached Members had notified the President of the following decisions changing the composition of the committees and delegations:

    – FEMM Committee: Fernand Kartheiser

    – Delegation to the OACPS-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly: Fernand Kartheiser

    The decisions took effect as of that day.



    10. Endometriosis: Europe’s wake-up call on the gender health gap (debate)

    Commission statement: Endometriosis: Europe’s wake-up call on the gender health gap (2025/2795(RSP))

    Hadja Lahbib (Member of the Commission) made the statement.

    The following spoke: András Tivadar Kulja, on behalf of the PPE Group, Vytenis Povilas Andriukaitis, on behalf of the S&D Group, Margarita de la Pisa Carrión, on behalf of the PfE Group, Chiara Gemma, on behalf of the ECR Group, Billy Kelleher, on behalf of the Renew Group, Majdouline Sbai, on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group, Catarina Martins, on behalf of The Left Group, Tomasz Froelich, on behalf of the ESN Group, Sirpa Pietikäinen, Evelyn Regner, who also answered a blue-card question from Petras Gražulis, Marie Dauchy, Mariateresa Vivaldini, Tilly Metz, Günther Sidl and Maria Grapini.

    The following spoke: Hadja Lahbib.

    The debate closed.



    11. Oral explanations of votes (Rule 201)



    11.1. Motion of censure on the Commission (B10-0319/2025)
    Cristian Terheş



    11.2. Tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictions (RC-B10-0324/2025)
    Günther Sidl



    12. Explanations of votes in writing (Rule 201)

    Explanations of votes given in writing would appear on the Members’ pages on Parliament’s website.



    13. Approval of the minutes of the sitting and forwarding of texts adopted

    In accordance with Rule 208(3), the minutes of the sitting would be put to the House for approval at the start of the next sitting.

    With Parliament’s agreement, the texts adopted during the part-session would be forwarded to their respective addressees without delay.



    14. Dates of the next part-session

    The next part-session would be held from 8 September 2025 to 11 September 2025.



    15. Closure of the sitting

    The sitting closed at 15:47.



    16. Adjournment of the session

    The session of the European Parliament was adjourned.

    Alessandro Chiocchetti

    Roberta Metsola

    Secretary-General

    President



    LIST OF DOCUMENTS SERVING AS A BASIS FOR THE DEBATES AND DECISIONS OF PARLIAMENT



    I. Motions for resolutions tabled

    Motion of censure on the Commission

    Motion for a resolution tabled under Rule 131:

    MOTION OF CENSURE ON THE COMMISSION (2025/2140(RSP)) (B10-0319/2025)
    Gheorghe Piperea, Adrian-George Axinia, Claudiu-Richard Târziu, Georgiana Teodorescu, Şerban Dimitrie Sturdza, Fidias Panayiotou, Daniel Obajtek, Ivan David, Patryk Jaki, Zsuzsanna Borvendég, Fernand Kartheiser, Nikolaos Anadiotis, Volker Schnurrbusch, Katarína Roth Neveďalová, Irmhild Boßdorf, Virginie Joron, Ondřej Dostál, Cristian Terheş, Christine Anderson, António Tânger Corrêa, Emmanouil Fragkos, Milan Mazurek, Alexander Jungbluth, Siegbert Frank Droese, Petar Volgin, Rada Laykova, Stanislav Stoyanov, Arno Bausemer, Arkadiusz Mularczyk, Bogdan Rzońca, Milan Uhrík, Mary Khan, Tomasz Froelich, Hans Neuhoff, Alexander Sell, René Aust, Petr Bystron, Jacek Ozdoba, Galato Alexandraki, Kosma Złotowski, Waldemar Buda, Tobiasz Bocheński, Małgorzata Gosiewska, Marlena Maląg, Mariusz Kamiński, Dominik Tarczyński, Anna Zalewska, Jadwiga Wiśniewska, Maciej Wąsik, Michał Dworczyk, Alvise Pérez, Luis-Vicențiu Lazarus, Erik Kaliňák, Judita Laššáková, Waldemar Tomaszewski, Ewa Zajączkowska-Hernik, Jaak Madison, Anja Arndt, Marcin Sypniewski, Markus Buchheit, Filip Turek, Friedrich Pürner, Kateřina Konečná, Ľuboš Blaha, Thierry Mariani, Jan-Peter Warnke, Thomas Geisel, Branislav Ondruš, Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă, Monika Beňová, Marc Jongen, Nikola Bartůšek, Grzegorz Braun, Sarah Knafo, Petras Gražulis, Piotr Müller, Gerald Hauser

    Case of Ryan Cornelius in Dubai

    Joint motion for a resolution tabled under Rule 150(5) and Rule 136(4):

    on the case of Ryan Cornelius in Dubai (2025/2796(RSP)) (RC-B10-0328/2025)
    (replacing motions for resolutions B10-0328/2025, B10-0333/2025, B10-0336/2025, B10-0340/2025 and B10-0341/2025)
    Sebastião Bugalho, Seán Kelly, Tomáš Zdechovský, Ingeborg Ter Laak, Isabel Wiseler-Lima, Tomas Tobé, Wouter Beke, Davor Ivo Stier, Łukasz Kohut, Mirosława Nykiel, Michał Wawrykiewicz, Inese Vaidere
    on behalf of the PPE Group
    Yannis Maniatis, Francisco Assis, Aodhán Ó Ríordáin
    on behalf of the S&D Group
    Adam Bielan, Sebastian Tynkkynen, Bogdan Rzońca, Arkadiusz Mularczyk, Waldemar Tomaszewski, Marlena Maląg, Joachim Stanisław Brudziński
    on behalf of the ECR Group
    Petras Auštrevičius, Malik Azmani, Dan Barna, Benoit Cassart, Engin Eroglu, Olivier Chastel, Karin Karlsbro, Ilhan Kyuchyuk, Hilde Vautmans, Lucia Yar
    on behalf of the Renew Group
    Villy Søvndal
    on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

    Arbitrary arrest and torture of Belgian-Portuguese researcher Joseph Figueira Martin in the Central African Republic

    Joint motion for a resolution tabled under Rule 150(5) and Rule 136(4):

    on the arbitrary arrest and torture of Belgian-Portuguese researcher Joseph Figueira Martin in the Central African Republic (2025/2797(RSP)) (RC-B10-0327/2025)
    (replacing motions for resolutions B10-0327/2025, B10-0334/2025, B10-0339/2025 and B10-0342/2025)
    Sebastião Bugalho, Wouter Beke, Ingeborg Ter Laak, Željana Zovko, Isabel Wiseler-Lima, Andrey Kovatchev, Tomas Tobé, Tomáš Zdechovský, Davor Ivo Stier, Łukasz Kohut, Liudas Mažylis, Vangelis Meimarakis, Loránt Vincze, Seán Kelly, Mirosława Nykiel, Michał Wawrykiewicz, Inese Vaidere
    on behalf of the PPE Group
    Yannis Maniatis, Kathleen Van Brempt, Francisco Assis
    on behalf of the S&D Group
    Adam Bielan, Jaak Madison, Alexandr Vondra, Sebastian Tynkkynen, Veronika Vrecionová, Ondřej Krutílek, Michał Dworczyk, Bogdan Rzońca, Arkadiusz Mularczyk, Waldemar Tomaszewski, Małgorzata Gosiewska, Assita Kanko, Marlena Maląg, Joachim Stanisław Brudziński
    on behalf of the ECR Group
    Hilde Vautmans, Oihane Agirregoitia Martínez, Petras Auštrevičius, Malik Azmani, Dan Barna, Benoit Cassart, Olivier Chastel, Engin Eroglu, Svenja Hahn, Karin Karlsbro, Ilhan Kyuchyuk, Nathalie Loiseau, Jan-Christoph Oetjen, Marie-Agnes Strack-Zimmermann, Lucia Yar
    on behalf of the Renew Group
    Saskia Bricmont
    on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

    Urgent need to protect religious minorities in Syria following the recent terrorist attack on Mar Elias Church in Damascus

    Joint motion for a resolution tabled under Rule 150(5) and Rule 136(4):

    on the urgent need to protect religious minorities in Syria following the recent terrorist attack on Mar Elias Church in Damascus (2025/2798(RSP)) (RC-B10-0335/2025)
    (replacing motions for resolutions B10-0335/2025, B10-0344/2025, B10-0345/2025, B10-0346/2025 and B10-0347/2025)
    Sebastião Bugalho, Ingeborg Ter Laak, David McAllister, François-Xavier Bellamy, Andrzej Halicki, Wouter Beke, Željana Zovko, Isabel Wiseler-Lima, Andrey Kovatchev, Tomas Tobé, Ioan-Rareş Bogdan, Tomáš Zdechovský, Davor Ivo Stier, Sander Smit, Elissavet Vozemberg-Vrionidi, Eleonora Meleti, Vangelis Meimarakis, Georgios Aftias, Dimitris Tsiodras, Emmanouil Kefalogiannis, Antonio López-Istúriz White, Matej Tonin, Massimiliano Salini, Łukasz Kohut, Loránt Vincze, Seán Kelly, Mirosława Nykiel, Michał Wawrykiewicz, Inese Vaidere, Michalis Hadjipantela, Miriam Lexmann
    on behalf of the PPE Group
    Yannis Maniatis, Francisco Assis, Marco Tarquinio, Hana Jalloul Muro, Evin Incir, Nikos Papandreou
    on behalf of the S&D Group
    Adam Bielan, Reinis Pozņaks, Alexandr Vondra, Veronika Vrecionová, Ondřej Krutílek, Guillaume Peltier, Marion Maréchal, Nicolas Bay, Laurence Trochu, Małgorzata Gosiewska, Aurelijus Veryga, Bogdan Rzońca, Arkadiusz Mularczyk, Waldemar Tomaszewski, Assita Kanko, Marlena Maląg, Carlo Fidanza, Alberico Gambino, Joachim Stanisław Brudziński
    on behalf of the ECR Group
    Nathalie Loiseau, Oihane Agirregoitia Martínez, Petras Auštrevičius, Malik Azmani, Dan Barna, Engin Eroglu, Svenja Hahn, Karin Karlsbro, Jan-Christoph Oetjen, Urmas Paet, Marie-Agnes Strack-Zimmermann, Hilde Vautmans, Lucia Yar
    on behalf of the Renew Group
    Hannah Neumann
    on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
    Nikolas Farantouris

    Tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictions

    Motions for resolutions tabled under Rule 136(2) to wind up the debate:

    on tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictions (2025/2800(RSP)) (B10-0324/2025)
    Hildegard Bentele
    on behalf of the PPE Group

    on tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictions (2025/2800(RSP)) (B10-0326/2025)
    Martin Schirdewan
    on behalf of The Left Group

    on tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictions (2025/2800(RSP)) (B10-0329/2025)
    Beata Szydło
    on behalf of the ECR Group

    on tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictions (2025/2800(RSP)) (B10-0330/2025)
    Bart Groothuis, Oihane Agirregoitia Martínez, Petras Auštrevičius, Malik Azmani, Dan Barna, Engin Eroglu, Svenja Hahn, Ľubica Karvašová, Ilhan Kyuchyuk, Marie-Agnes Strack-Zimmermann, Hilde Vautmans, Lucia Yar
    on behalf of the Renew Group

    on tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictions (2025/2800(RSP)) (B10-0331/2025)
    Ville Niinistö, Michael Bloss, Majdouline Sbai, Maria Ohisalo, Markéta Gregorová, Sara Matthieu
    on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

    on tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictions (2025/2800(RSP)) (B10-0332/2025)
    Kathleen Van Brempt
    on behalf of the S&D Group

    Joint motion for a resolution tabled under Rule 136(2) and (4):

    on tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictions (2025/2800(RSP)) (RC-B10-0324/2025/REV1)
    (replacing motions for resolutions B10-0324/2025, B10-0329/2025, B10-0330/2025, B10-0331/2025 and B10-0332/2025)
    Hildegard Bentele
    on behalf of the PPE Group
    Kathleen Van Brempt
    on behalf of the S&D Group
    Beata Szydło, Mariusz Kamiński
    on behalf of the ECR Group
    Bart Groothuis, Oihane Agirregoitia Martínez, Petras Auštrevičius, Malik Azmani, Dan Barna, Engin Eroglu, Christophe Grudler, Svenja Hahn, Ľubica Karvašová, Michał Kobosko, Ilhan Kyuchyuk, Nathalie Loiseau, Marie-Agnes Strack-Zimmermann, Hilde Vautmans, Marie-Pierre Vedrenne, Lucia Yar
    on behalf of the Renew Group
    Ville Niinistö
    on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group



    II. Petitions

    Petitions Nos 0818-25 to 1048-25 had been entered in the register on 4 July 2025 and had been forwarded to the committee responsible, in accordance with Rule 232(9) and (10).

    The President had, on 4 July 2025, forwarded to the committee responsible, in accordance with Rule 232(15), petitions addressed to Parliament by natural or legal persons who were not citizens of the European Union and who did not reside, or have their registered office, in a Member State.



    III. Documents received

    The following documents had been received:

    1) from other institutions

    – Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2014/45/EU on periodic roadworthiness tests for motor vehicles and their trailers and Directive 2014/47/EU on the technical roadside inspection of the roadworthiness of commercial vehicles circulating in the Union (COM(2025)0180 – C10-0072/2025 – 2025/0097(COD))
    In accordance with Rules 151(1) and 152(1), the President consults the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on the proposal.
    referred to committee responsible: TRAN

    – Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the registration documents for vehicles and vehicle registration data recorded in national vehicle registers and repealing Council Directive 1999/37/EC (COM(2025)0179 – C10-0073/2025 – 2025/0096(COD))
    In accordance with Rules 151(1) and 152(1), the President consults the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on the proposal.
    referred to committee responsible: TRAN
    opinion: IMCO

    – Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2024/1348 as regards the application of the ‘safe third country’ concept (COM(2025)0259 – C10-0088/2025 – 2025/0132(COD))
    referred to committee responsible: LIBE

    – Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulations (EU) No 765/2008, (EU) 2016/424, (EU) 2016/425, (EU) 2016/426, (EU) 2023/1230, (EU) 2023/1542 and (EU) 2024/1781 as regards digitalisation and common specifications (COM(2025)0504 – C10-0090/2025 – 2025/0134(COD))
    In accordance with Rule 151(1), the President consults the European Economic and Social Committee on the proposal.
    referred to committee responsible: IMCO
    opinion: ENVI

    – Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directives 2000/14/EC, 2011/65/EU, 2013/53/EU, 2014/29/EU, 2014/30/EU, 2014/31/EU, 2014/32/EU, 2014/33/EU, 2014/34/EU, 2014/35/EU, 2014/53/EU, 2014/68/EU and 2014/90/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards digitalisation and common specifications (COM(2025)0503 – C10-0091/2025 – 2025/0133(COD))
    In accordance with Rule 151(1), the President consults the European Economic and Social Committee on the proposal.
    referred to committee responsible: IMCO
    opinion: ENVI, TRAN

    – Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulations (EU) 2016/679, (EU) 2016/1036, (EU) 2016/1037, (EU) 2017/1129, (EU) 2023/1542 and (EU) 2024/573 as regards the extension of certain mitigating measures available for small and medium-sized enterprises to small mid-cap enterprises and further simplification measures (COM(2025)0501 – C10-0092/2025 – 2025/0130(COD))
    In accordance with Rules 151(1) and 152(1), the President consults the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on the proposal.
    referred to committee responsible: ECON, ENVI, LIBE
    opinion: INTA, ITRE, IMCO

    – Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directives 2009/43/EC and 2009/81/EC, as regards the simplification of intra-EU transfers of defence-related products and the simplification of security and defence procurement (COM(2025)0823 – C10-0120/2025 – 2025/0177(COD))
    In accordance with Rule 151(1), the President consults the European Economic and Social Committee on the proposal.
    referred to committee responsible: SEDE, IMCO
    opinion: ITRE

    – Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulations (EC) No 1907/2006, (EC) No 1272/2008, (EU) No 528/2012, (EU) 2019/1021 and (EU) 2021/697 as regards defence readiness and facilitating defence investments and conditions for defence industry (COM(2025)0822 – C10-0121/2025 – 2025/0176(COD))
    In accordance with Rules 151(1) and 152(1), the President consults the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on the proposal.
    referred to committee responsible: SEDE, ENVI, ITRE
    opinion: IMCO

    2) from Members

    – Mathilde Androuët, Gerolf Annemans, Jordan Bardella, Nikola Bartůšek, Christophe Bay, Barbara Bonte, Paolo Borchia, Mireia Borrás Pabón, Marie-Luce Brasier-Clain, Anna Bryłka, Jorge Buxadé Villalba, Susanna Ceccardi, Anna Maria Cisint, Marie Dauchy, Valérie Deloge, Mélanie Disdier, Csaba Dömötör, Marieke Ehlers, Viktória Ferenc, Anne-Sophie Frigout, Angéline Furet, Jean-Paul Garraud, Catherine Griset, András Gyürk, Enikő Győri, Kinga Gál, Roman Haider, Gerald Hauser, György Hölvényi, Virginie Joron, Ondřej Knotek, Vilis Krištopans, Afroditi Latinopoulou, Fabrice Leggeri, Julien Leonardelli, András László, Thierry Mariani, Jorge Martín Frías, Tiago Moreira de Sá, Aleksandar Nikolic, Philippe Olivier, Gilles Pennelle, Pascale Piera, Pierre Pimpie, Jaroslava Pokorná Jermanová, Julie Rechagneux, Julien Sanchez, Silvia Sardone, Ernő Schaller-Baross, Pál Szekeres, Hermann Tertsch, Pierre-Romain Thionnet, Rody Tolassy, Isabella Tovaglieri, Filip Turek, António Tânger Corrêa, Matthieu Valet, Roberto Vannacci, Alexandre Varaut, Séverine Werbrouck and Margarita de la Pisa Carrión. Motion for a resolution on combating the establishment of transnational Islamist networks in Europe (B10-0279/2025)
    referred to committee responsible: LIBE

    – Zsuzsanna Borvendég, Siegbert Frank Droese, Milan Mazurek, Volker Schnurrbusch and Petar Volgin. Motion for a resolution on the escalation in the Middle East following Israel’s attack on Iran (B10-0301/2025)
    referred to committee responsible: AFET
    opinion: SEDE, LIBE



    IV. Decisions to draw up own-initiative reports

    Decisions to draw up own-initiative reports (Rule 55)

    (Following the Conference of Presidents’ decision of 2 July 2025)

    ECON Committee

    – Competition policy – annual report 2025 (2025/2134(INI))

    – Banking Union – annual report 2025 (2025/2136(INI))

    EMPL Committee

    – Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights (2025/2133(INI))
    (opinion: IMCO)

    LIBE Committee

    – Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025 (2025/2135(INI))

    – Public access to documents – report covering the years 2022-2024 (2025/2137(INI))

    PETI Committee

    – Activities of the European Ombudsman – annual report 2024 (2025/2138(INI))

    SANT Committee

    – An EU cardiovascular diseases strategy (2025/2132(INI))

    – Europe’s Beating Cancer Plan (2025/2139(INI))

    (Following the Conference of Presidents’ decision of 8 July 2025)

    SEDE Committee

    – European defence readiness 2030: assessment of needs (2025/2142(INI))
    (opinion: BUDG, ECON, ITRE)

    – Tackling barriers to the single market for defence (2025/2143(INI))
    (opinion: ECON, ITRE, IMCO)

    – Flagship European defence projects of common interest (2025/2144(INI))
    (opinion: ITRE, IMCO)

    Decisions to draw up own-initiative reports (Rule 47)

    (Following the Conference of Presidents’ decision of 2 July 2025)

    EMPL Committee

    – Just transition directive in the world of work: ensuring the creation of jobs and revitalising local economies (2025/2131(INL))

    SANT Committee

    – EU rare disease action plan (2025/2130(INL))



    V. Consent procedure

    Reports with a motion for a non-legislative resolution (consent procedure) (Rule 107(2))

    (Following notification by the Conference of Committee Chairs on 2 July 2025)

    INTA Committee

    – Digital Trade Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Singapore (2025/0009M(NLE) – 2025/0009(NLE))



    ATTENDANCE REGISTER

    Present:

    Aaltola Mika, Abadía Jover Maravillas, Adamowicz Magdalena, Aftias Georgios, Agirregoitia Martínez Oihane, Agius Peter, Agius Saliba Alex, Alexandraki Galato, Allione Grégory, Anadiotis Nikolaos, Anderson Christine, Andersson Li, Andresen Rasmus, Andrews Barry, Andriukaitis Vytenis Povilas, Androuët Mathilde, Angel Marc, Annemans Gerolf, Annunziata Lucia, Antoci Giuseppe, Arias Echeverría Pablo, Arłukowicz Bartosz, Arnaoutoglou Sakis, Arndt Anja, Arvanitis Konstantinos, Asens Llodrà Jaume, Assis Francisco, Attard Daniel, Aubry Manon, Auštrevičius Petras, Axinia Adrian-George, Azmani Malik, Bajada Thomas, Baljeu Jeannette, Ballarín Cereza Laura, Bardella Jordan, Barley Katarina, Barna Dan, Barrena Arza Pernando, Bartulica Stephen Nikola, Bartůšek Nikola, Bausemer Arno, Bay Nicolas, Bay Christophe, Beke Wouter, Beleris Fredis, Bellamy François-Xavier, Benifei Brando, Benjumea Benjumea Isabel, Beňová Monika, Bentele Hildegard, Berendsen Tom, Berger Stefan, Berg Sibylle, Berlato Sergio, Bernhuber Alexander, Biedroń Robert, Bielan Adam, Bischoff Gabriele, Blaha Ľuboš, Blinkevičiūtė Vilija, Blom Rachel, Bloss Michael, Bocheński Tobiasz, Boeselager Damian, Bogdan Ioan-Rareş, Bonaccini Stefano, Bonte Barbara, Borchia Paolo, Borrás Pabón Mireia, Borvendég Zsuzsanna, Borzan Biljana, Bosanac Gordan, Boßdorf Irmhild, Bosse Stine, Botenga Marc, Boyer Gilles, Boylan Lynn, Brandstätter Helmut, Brasier-Clain Marie-Luce, Brejza Krzysztof, Bricmont Saskia, Brnjac Nikolina, Brudziński Joachim Stanisław, Bryłka Anna, Buczek Tomasz, Buda Daniel, Buda Waldemar, Bugalho Sebastião, Buła Andrzej, Bullmann Udo, Buxadé Villalba Jorge, Bystron Petr, Bžoch Jaroslav, Camara Mélissa, Canfin Pascal, Carberry Nina, Carême Damien, Casa David, Caspary Daniel, Cassart Benoit, Castillo Laurent, del Castillo Vera Pilar, Cavazzini Anna, Ceccardi Susanna, Cepeda José, Ceulemans Estelle, Chahim Mohammed, Chaibi Leila, Chastel Olivier, Chinnici Caterina, Christensen Asger, Ciccioli Carlo, Cifrová Ostrihoňová Veronika, Ciriani Alessandro, Cisint Anna Maria, Clausen Per, Cormand David, Corrado Annalisa, Costanzo Vivien, Cotrim De Figueiredo João, Cowen Barry, Cremer Tobias, Crespo Díaz Carmen, Cristea Andi, Crosetto Giovanni, Cunha Paulo, Dahl Henrik, Danielsson Johan, Dauchy Marie, Dávid Dóra, David Ivan, Decaro Antonio, de la Hoz Quintano Raúl, Della Valle Danilo, Deloge Valérie, De Masi Fabio, De Meo Salvatore, Demirel Özlem, Deutsch Tamás, Devaux Valérie, Dibrani Adnan, Diepeveen Ton, Dieringer Elisabeth, Dîncu Vasile, Di Rupo Elio, Disdier Mélanie, Dobrev Klára, Doherty Regina, Doleschal Christian, Dömötör Csaba, Do Nascimento Cabral Paulo, Donazzan Elena, Dorfmann Herbert, Dostalova Klara, Dostál Ondřej, Droese Siegbert Frank, Düpont Lena, Dworczyk Michał, Ecke Matthias, Ehler Christian, Ehlers Marieke, Eriksson Sofie, Erixon Dick, Eroglu Engin, Estaràs Ferragut Rosa, Everding Sebastian, Ezcurra Almansa Alma, Falcă Gheorghe, Falcone Marco, Farantouris Nikolas, Farreng Laurence, Farský Jan, Ferber Markus, Ferenc Viktória, Fernández Jonás, Fidanza Carlo, Fiocchi Pietro, Firmenich Ruth, Fita Claire, Flanagan Luke Ming, Fourlas Loucas, Fourreau Emma, Fragkos Emmanouil, Freund Daniel, Frigout Anne-Sophie, Fritzon Heléne, Froelich Tomasz, Fuglsang Niels, Funchion Kathleen, Furet Angéline, Furore Mario, Gahler Michael, Gál Kinga, Galán Estrella, Gálvez Lina, Gambino Alberico, García Hermida-Van Der Walle Raquel, Garraud Jean-Paul, Gasiuk-Pihowicz Kamila, Geadi Geadis, Gedin Hanna, Geese Alexandra, Geier Jens, Geisel Thomas, Gemma Chiara, Georgiou Giorgos, Gerbrandy Gerben-Jan, Germain Jean-Marc, Gerzsenyi Gabriella, Geuking Niels, Gieseke Jens, Giménez Larraz Borja, Girauta Vidal Juan Carlos, Glavak Sunčana, Glück Andreas, Glucksmann Raphaël, Goerens Charles, Gomart Christophe, Gomes Isilda, Gómez López Sandra, Gonçalves Bruno, Gonçalves Sérgio, González Casares Nicolás, González Pons Esteban, Gosiewska Małgorzata, Gotink Dirk, Gozi Sandro, Grapini Maria, Gražulis Petras, Gregorová Markéta, Grims Branko, Griset Catherine, Gronkiewicz-Waltz Hanna, Groothuis Bart, Grossmann Elisabeth, Grudler Christophe, Guarda Cristina, Guetta Bernard, Guzenina Maria, Győri Enikő, Gyürk András, Hadjipantela Michalis, Hahn Svenja, Haider Roman, Halicki Andrzej, Hansen Niels Flemming, Hassan Rima, Hauser Gerald, Häusling Martin, Hava Mircea-Gheorghe, Heide Hannes, Heinäluoma Eero, Herbst Niclas, Herranz García Esther, Hohlmeier Monika, Hojsík Martin, Holmgren Pär, Homs Ginel Alicia, Humberto Sérgio, Ijabs Ivars, Imart Céline, Incir Evin, Inselvini Paolo, Iovanovici Şoşoacă Diana, Jamet France, Jarubas Adam, Jerković Romana, Jongen Marc, Joński Dariusz, Joron Virginie, Jouvet Pierre, Joveva Irena, Juknevičienė Rasa, Junco García Nora, Jungbluth Alexander, Kabilov Taner, Kalfon François, Kaliňák Erik, Kaljurand Marina, Kalniete Sandra, Kamiński Mariusz, Kanev Radan, Karlsbro Karin, Kartheiser Fernand, Karvašová Ľubica, Katainen Elsi, Kefalogiannis Emmanouil, Kelleher Billy, Keller Fabienne, Kelly Seán, Kemp Martine, Kennes Rudi, Khan Mary, Kircher Sophia, Knafo Sarah, Knotek Ondřej, Kobosko Michał, Köhler Stefan, Kohut Łukasz, Kokalari Arba, Kolář Ondřej, Kollár Kinga, Kols Rihards, Konečná Kateřina, Kopacz Ewa, Körner Moritz, Kountoura Elena, Kovatchev Andrey, Krištopans Vilis, Kruis Sebastian, Krutílek Ondřej, Kubín Tomáš, Kuhnke Alice, Kulja András Tivadar, Kulmuni Katri, Kyllönen Merja, Kyuchyuk Ilhan, Lagodinsky Sergey, Lakos Eszter, Lalucq Aurore, Lange Bernd, Langensiepen Katrin, Laššáková Judita, László András, Latinopoulou Afroditi, Laurent Murielle, Laureti Camilla, Laykova Rada, Lazarov Ilia, Lazarus Luis-Vicențiu, Le Callennec Isabelle, Leggeri Fabrice, Lenaers Jeroen, Leonardelli Julien, Lewandowski Janusz, Lexmann Miriam, Liese Peter, Lins Norbert, Loiseau Nathalie, Løkkegaard Morten, Lopatka Reinhold, López Javi, López-Istúriz White Antonio, Lövin Isabella, Luena César, Łukacijewska Elżbieta Katarzyna, Lupo Giuseppe, McAllister David, Madison Jaak, Maestre Cristina, Magoni Lara, Magyar Péter, Maij Marit, Maląg Marlena, Manda Claudiu, Mandl Lukas, Maniatis Yannis, Mantovani Mario, Maran Pierfrancesco, Marino Ignazio Roberto, Marquardt Erik, Martín Frías Jorge, Martins Catarina, Martusciello Fulvio, Marzà Ibáñez Vicent, Mato Gabriel, Matthieu Sara, Mavrides Costas, Maydell Eva, Mayer Georg, Mazurek Milan, Mažylis Liudas, Mebarek Nora, Mehnert Alexandra, Meimarakis Vangelis, Meleti Eleonora, Mendes Ana Catarina, Mendia Idoia, Mertens Verena, Mesure Marina, Metsola Roberta, Metz Tilly, Mikser Sven, Millán Mon Francisco José, Miranda Paz Ana, Molnár Csaba, Montero Irene, Montserrat Dolors, Morace Carolina, Morano Nadine, Moratti Letizia, Moreira de Sá Tiago, Moreno Sánchez Javier, Moretti Alessandra, Mularczyk Arkadiusz, Müller Piotr, Mullooly Ciaran, Mureşan Siegfried, Muşoiu Ştefan, Nagyová Jana, Nardella Dario, Navarrete Rojas Fernando, Negrescu Victor, Nemec Matjaž, Nerudová Danuše, Nesci Denis, Neuhoff Hans, Neumann Hannah, Niebler Angelika, Niedermayer Luděk, Niinistö Ville, Nikolaou-Alavanos Lefteris, Nikolic Aleksandar, Ní Mhurchú Cynthia, Noichl Maria, Nordqvist Rasmus, Novakov Andrey, Nykiel Mirosława, Obajtek Daniel, Ódor Ľudovít, Oetjen Jan-Christoph, Oliveira João, Olivier Philippe, Omarjee Younous, Ondruš Branislav, Ó Ríordáin Aodhán, Orlando Leoluca, Ozdoba Jacek, Paet Urmas, Pajín Leire, Palmisano Valentina, Panayiotou Fidias, Papadakis Kostas, Pappas Nikos, Pascual de la Parte Nicolás, Patriciello Aldo, Paulus Jutta, Pedro Ana Miguel, Pedulla’ Gaetano, Pellerin-Carlin Thomas, Peltier Guillaume, Penkova Tsvetelina, Pennelle Gilles, Pereira Lídia, Peter-Hansen Kira Marie, Petrov Hristo, Picaro Michele, Picierno Pina, Picula Tonino, Piera Pascale, Pietikäinen Sirpa, Pimpie Pierre, Piperea Gheorghe, de la Pisa Carrión Margarita, Pokorná Jermanová Jaroslava, Polato Daniele, Polfjärd Jessica, Popescu Virgil-Daniel, Pozņaks Reinis, Prebilič Vladimir, Princi Giusi, Protas Jacek, Pürner Friedrich, Rackete Carola, Radev Emil, Radtke Dennis, Rafowicz Emma, Ratas Jüri, Razza Ruggero, Rechagneux Julie, Regner Evelyn, Repp Sabrina, Ressler Karlo, Reuten Thijs, Riba i Giner Diana, Ridel Chloé, Riehl Nela, Rodrigues André, Ros Sempere Marcos, Roth Neveďalová Katarína, Rougé André, Ruissen Bert-Jan, Ruotolo Sandro, Rzońca Bogdan, Saeidi Arash, Salini Massimiliano, Salis Ilaria, Salla Aura, Sánchez Amor Nacho, Sanchez Julien, Sancho Murillo Elena, Saramo Jussi, Sardone Silvia, Šarec Marjan, Satouri Mounir, Saudargas Paulius, Sbai Majdouline, Sberna Antonella, Schaldemose Christel, Schaller-Baross Ernő, Schenk Oliver, Scheuring-Wielgus Joanna, Schieder Andreas, Schilling Lena, Schneider Christine, Schnurrbusch Volker, Schwab Andreas, Scuderi Benedetta, Seekatz Ralf, Sell Alexander, Serrano Sierra Rosa, Sidl Günther, Sienkiewicz Bartłomiej, Simon Sven, Singer Christine, Sinkevičius Virginijus, Sippel Birgit, Sjöstedt Jonas, Śmiszek Krzysztof, Smith Anthony, Smit Sander, Sokol Tomislav, Solier Diego, Solís Pérez Susana, Sommen Liesbet, Sonneborn Martin, Sorel Malika, Sousa Silva Hélder, Søvndal Villy, Staķis Mārtiņš, Stancanelli Raffaele, Ștefănuță Nicolae, Steger Petra, Stier Davor Ivo, Storm Kristoffer, Stöteler Sebastiaan, Stoyanov Stanislav, Strack-Zimmermann Marie-Agnes, Strada Cecilia, Streit Joachim, Strik Tineke, Strolenberg Anna, Sturdza Şerban Dimitrie, Stürgkh Anna, Sypniewski Marcin, Szekeres Pál, Szydło Beata, Tamburrano Dario, Tânger Corrêa António, Tarczyński Dominik, Tarquinio Marco, Tarr Zoltán, Târziu Claudiu-Richard, Tavares Carla, Tegethoff Kai, Temido Marta, Teodorescu Georgiana, Teodorescu Måwe Alice, Terheş Cristian, Ter Laak Ingeborg, Terras Riho, Tertsch Hermann, Thionnet Pierre-Romain, Timgren Beatrice, Tinagli Irene, Tobback Bruno, Tobé Tomas, Tolassy Rody, Tomašič Zala, Tomaszewski Waldemar, Tomc Romana, Tonin Matej, Toom Jana, Topo Raffaele, Torselli Francesco, Tosi Flavio, Toussaint Marie, Tovaglieri Isabella, Toveri Pekka, Tridico Pasquale, Trochu Laurence, Tsiodras Dimitris, Turek Filip, Tynkkynen Sebastian, Uhrík Milan, Vaidere Inese, Valchev Ivaylo, Vălean Adina, Valet Matthieu, Van Brempt Kathleen, Van Brug Anouk, van den Berg Brigitte, Vandendriessche Tom, Van Dijck Kris, Van Lanschot Reinier, Van Leeuwen Jessika, Vannacci Roberto, Van Overtveldt Johan, Van Sparrentak Kim, Varaut Alexandre, Vasconcelos Ana, Vasile-Voiculescu Vlad, Vautmans Hilde, Vedrenne Marie-Pierre, Ventola Francesco, Verheyen Sabine, Veryga Aurelijus, Vešligaj Marko, Vicsek Annamária, Vieira Catarina, Vigenin Kristian, Vincze Loránt, Vind Marianne, Vivaldini Mariateresa, Volgin Petar, von der Schulenburg Michael, Vondra Alexandr, Voss Axel, Vozemberg-Vrionidi Elissavet, Vrecionová Veronika, Vázquez Lázara Adrián, Waitz Thomas, Walsh Maria, Walsmann Marion, Warborn Jörgen, Warnke Jan-Peter, Wąsik Maciej, Wawrykiewicz Michał, Wcisło Marta, Wechsler Andrea, Weimers Charlie, Werbrouck Séverine, Wiesner Emma, Wiezik Michal, Wilmès Sophie, Winkler Iuliu, Winzig Angelika, Wiseler-Lima Isabel, Wiśniewska Jadwiga, Wolters Lara, Yar Lucia, Yon-Courtin Stéphanie, Yoncheva Elena, Zacharia Maria, Zajączkowska-Hernik Ewa, Zalewska Anna, Žalimas Dainius, Zan Alessandro, Zarzalejos Javier, Zdechovský Tomáš, Zdrojewski Bogdan Andrzej, Zijlstra Auke, Zingaretti Nicola, Złotowski Kosma, Zoido Álvarez Juan Ignacio, Zovko Željana, Zver Milan

    Excused:

    Burkhardt Delara, Friis Sigrid, Hazekamp Anja

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Minutes – Thursday, 10 July 2025 – Strasbourg – Final edition

    Source: European Parliament 2

    PV-10-2025-07-10

    EN

    EN

    iPlPv_Sit

    Minutes
    Thursday, 10 July 2025 – Strasbourg

    IN THE CHAIR: Christel SCHALDEMOSE
    Vice-President

    1. Opening of the sitting

    The sitting opened at 09:00.



    2. Council positions at first reading (Rule 64)

    – Position of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2008/98/EC on waste – Adopted by the Council on 23 June 2025 (06978/2/2025 – COM(2025)0388 – C10-0139/2025 – 2023/0234(COD))
    referred to committee responsible: ENVI

    The three-month period available to Parliament under Article 294 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union for it to adopt its position would begin the following day, 11 July 2025.



    3. Post-2027 common agricultural policy (debate)

    Commission statement: Post-2027 common agricultural policy (2025/2791(RSP))

    Christophe Hansen (Member of the Commission) made the statement.

    The following spoke: Herbert Dorfmann, on behalf of the PPE Group, Dario Nardella, on behalf of the S&D Group (the President reminded the speaker of the rules on conduct), Raffaele Stancanelli, on behalf of the PfE Group, Carlo Fidanza, on behalf of the ECR Group, Elsi Katainen, on behalf of the Renew Group, Thomas Waitz, on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group, Luke Ming Flanagan, on behalf of The Left Group, Arno Bausemer, on behalf of the ESN Group, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Cristina Maestre, Mathilde Androuët, Veronika Vrecionová, Barry Cowen, Anna Strolenberg, Arash Saeidi, Sarah Knafo, Katarína Roth Neveďalová, Siegfried Mureşan, André Rodrigues, Mireia Borrás Pabón, who also answered a blue-card question from Ana Miranda Paz, Bert-Jan Ruissen, Asger Christensen, Giuseppe Antoci, David Cormand, Norbert Lins, Camilla Laureti, Gilles Pennelle, Waldemar Buda, Christine Singer, who also answered a blue-card question from Arkadiusz Mularczyk, Cristina Guarda, Konstantinos Arvanitis, Daniel Buda, Vytenis Povilas Andriukaitis, Valérie Deloge, Benoit Cassart, Martin Häusling, Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral, Maria Grapini, Ton Diepeveen, Jacek Ozdoba, Ciaran Mullooly, Pär Holmgren, Péter Magyar, Marko Vešligaj, Barbara Bonte, Michal Wiezik, Jessika Van Leeuwen, Csaba Dömötör and Céline Imart.

    The following spoke under the catch-the-eye procedure: Gabriel Mato, Sebastian Tynkkynen, Ana Miranda Paz, Maria Zacharia, Nina Carberry and Arkadiusz Mularczyk.

    IN THE CHAIR: Pina PICIERNO
    Vice-President

    The following spoke under the catch-the-eye procedure: Francisco José Millán Mon, Maria Walsh, Stefan Köhler and Lefteris Nikolaou-Alavanos.

    The following spoke: Christophe Hansen.

    The debate closed.



    4. European Citizens’ Initiative ‘Cohesion policy for the equality of the regions and sustainability of the regional cultures’ (debate)

    European Citizens’ Initiative ‘Cohesion policy for the equality of the regions and sustainability of the regional cultures’ (2025/2655(RSP)) (Rule 228(8))

    Francesco Ventola and Bogdan Rzońca presented the European Citizens’ Initiative.

    The following spoke: Hadja Lahbib (Member of the Commission).

    The following spoke: Iuliu Winkler, on behalf of the PPE Group, Alex Agius Saliba, on behalf of the S&D Group, Kinga Gál, on behalf of the PfE Group, Antonella Sberna, on behalf of the ECR Group, Raquel García Hermida-Van Der Walle, on behalf of the Renew Group, Vladimir Prebilič, on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group, Siegbert Frank Droese, on behalf of the ESN Group, Gabriella Gerzsenyi, Marcos Ros Sempere, André Rougé, who also answered a blue-card question from Raquel García Hermida-Van Der Walle, Guillaume Peltier, Joachim Streit, Kathleen Funchion, Volker Schnurrbusch, Fidias Panayiotou, Daniel Buda, Hannes Heide, Rody Tolassy, Nora Junco García, Irmhild Boßdorf, who also answered a blue-card question from Arkadiusz Mularczyk, Rosa Estaràs Ferragut, Sabrina Repp, Alexandra Mehnert, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Loránt Vincze, Isilda Gomes, Łukasz Kohut, Sandra Gómez López, Andi Cristea and Sofie Eriksson.

    The following spoke under the catch-the-eye procedure: Gabriel Mato, Viktória Ferenc, Arkadiusz Mularczyk, Oihane Agirregoitia Martínez, Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă, Nikolina Brnjac and Sebastian Tynkkynen.

    The following spoke: Hadja Lahbib.

    The debate closed.

    (The sitting was suspended at 11:51.)



    IN THE CHAIR: Roberta METSOLA
    President

    5. Resumption of the sitting

    The sitting resumed at 12:00.

    ⁂

    The President thanked the Members and Parliament’s staff for their work during the first year of the current parliamentary term.



    6. Voting time

    For detailed results of the votes, see also ‘Results of votes’ and ‘Results of roll-call votes’.



    6.1. Motion of censure on the Commission (vote)

    Motion of censure on the Commission B10-0319/2025 (minutes of 10.7.2025, item I) (2025/2140(RSP))

    (Majority of two thirds of the votes cast, constituting a majority of Parliament’s component Members)

    MOTION OF CENSURE (Rule 131)

    Rejected

    (‘Results of votes’, item 1)

    ⁂

    Özlem Demirel, on the admissibility of an amendment concerning one of the items in voting time (the President gave explanations).



    6.2. Case of Ryan Cornelius in Dubai (vote)

    Motions for resolutions RC-B10-0328/2025 (minutes of 10.7.2025, item I), B10-0328/2025, B10-0333/2025, B10-0336/2025, B10-0340/2025 and B10-0341/2025 (minutes of 9.7.2025, item I) (2025/2796(RSP))

    (Majority of the votes cast)

    JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION

    Adopted (P10_TA(2025)0161)

    (‘Results of votes’, item 2)



    6.3. Arbitrary arrest and torture of Belgian-Portuguese researcher Joseph Figueira Martin in the Central African Republic (vote)

    Motions for resolutions RC-B10-0327/2025 (minutes of 10.7.2025, item I), B10-0323/2025, B10-0327/2025, B10-0334/2025, B10-0339/2025 and B10-0342/2025 (minutes of 9.7.2025, item I) (2025/2797(RSP))

    (Majority of the votes cast)

    JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION

    Adopted (P10_TA(2025)0162)

    (Motion for a resolution B10-0323/2025 fell.)

    (‘Results of votes’, item 3)



    6.4. Urgent need to protect religious minorities in Syria following the recent terrorist attack on Mar Elias Church in Damascus (vote)

    Motions for resolutions RC-B10-0335/2025 (minutes of 10.7.2025, item I), B10-0325/2025, B10-0335/2025, B10-0338/2025, B10-0343/2025, B10-0344/2025, B10-0345/2025, B10-0346/2025 and B10-0347/2025 (minutes of 9.7.2025, item I) (2025/2798(RSP))

    (Majority of the votes cast)

    JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION

    Adopted (P10_TA(2025)0163)

    (Motions for resolutions B10-0325/2025, B10-0338/2025 and B10-0343/2025 fell.)

    (‘Results of votes’, item 4)



    6.5. Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 as regards obligations of economic operators concerning battery due diligence policies ***I (vote)

    Report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 as regards obligations of economic operators concerning battery due diligence policies [COM(2025)0258 – C10-0089/2025 – 2025/0129(COD)] – Committee on the Environment, Climate and Food Safety. Rapporteur: Antonio Decaro (A10-0134/2025)

    (Majority of the votes cast)

    COMMISSION PROPOSAL and AMENDMENTS

    Approved (P10_TA(2025)0164)

    Parliament’s first reading thus closed.

    (‘Results of votes’, item 5)



    6.6. Future of the EU biotechnology and biomanufacturing sector: leveraging research, boosting innovation and enhancing competitiveness (vote)

    Report on the future of the EU biotechnology and biomanufacturing sector: leveraging research, boosting innovation and enhancing competitiveness [2025/2008(INI)] – Committee on Industry, Research and Energy. Rapporteur: Hildegard Bentele (A10-0123/2025)

    (Majority of the votes cast)

    MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION

    Adopted (P10_TA(2025)0165)

    The following had spoken:

    Hildegard Bentele, before the vote, to make a statement pursuant to Rule 165(4).

    (‘Results of votes’, item 6)



    6.7. Tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictions (vote)

    Motions for resolutions RC-B10-0324/2025/REV1, B10-0324/2025, B10-0326/2025, B10-0329/2025, B10-0330/2025, B10-0331/2025 and B10-0332/2025 (minutes of 10.7.2025, item I) (2025/2800(RSP))

    (Majority of the votes cast)

    JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION

    Adopted (P10_TA(2025)0166)

    (Motion for a resolution B10-0326/2025 fell.)

    (‘Results of votes’, item 7)

    (The sitting was suspended at 12:18.)



    IN THE CHAIR: Younous OMARJEE
    Vice-President

    7. Resumption of the sitting

    The sitting resumed at 15:00.



    8. Approval of the minutes of the previous sitting

    The minutes of the previous sitting were approved.



    9. Composition of committees and delegations

    The non-attached Members had notified the President of the following decisions changing the composition of the committees and delegations:

    – FEMM Committee: Fernand Kartheiser

    – Delegation to the OACPS-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly: Fernand Kartheiser

    The decisions took effect as of that day.



    10. Endometriosis: Europe’s wake-up call on the gender health gap (debate)

    Commission statement: Endometriosis: Europe’s wake-up call on the gender health gap (2025/2795(RSP))

    Hadja Lahbib (Member of the Commission) made the statement.

    The following spoke: András Tivadar Kulja, on behalf of the PPE Group, Vytenis Povilas Andriukaitis, on behalf of the S&D Group, Margarita de la Pisa Carrión, on behalf of the PfE Group, Chiara Gemma, on behalf of the ECR Group, Billy Kelleher, on behalf of the Renew Group, Majdouline Sbai, on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group, Catarina Martins, on behalf of The Left Group, Tomasz Froelich, on behalf of the ESN Group, Sirpa Pietikäinen, Evelyn Regner, who also answered a blue-card question from Petras Gražulis, Marie Dauchy, Mariateresa Vivaldini, Tilly Metz, Günther Sidl and Maria Grapini.

    The following spoke: Hadja Lahbib.

    The debate closed.



    11. Oral explanations of votes (Rule 201)



    11.1. Motion of censure on the Commission (B10-0319/2025)
    Cristian Terheş



    11.2. Tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictions (RC-B10-0324/2025)
    Günther Sidl



    12. Explanations of votes in writing (Rule 201)

    Explanations of votes given in writing would appear on the Members’ pages on Parliament’s website.



    13. Approval of the minutes of the sitting and forwarding of texts adopted

    In accordance with Rule 208(3), the minutes of the sitting would be put to the House for approval at the start of the next sitting.

    With Parliament’s agreement, the texts adopted during the part-session would be forwarded to their respective addressees without delay.



    14. Dates of the next part-session

    The next part-session would be held from 8 September 2025 to 11 September 2025.



    15. Closure of the sitting

    The sitting closed at 15:47.



    16. Adjournment of the session

    The session of the European Parliament was adjourned.

    Alessandro Chiocchetti

    Roberta Metsola

    Secretary-General

    President



    LIST OF DOCUMENTS SERVING AS A BASIS FOR THE DEBATES AND DECISIONS OF PARLIAMENT



    I. Motions for resolutions tabled

    Motion of censure on the Commission

    Motion for a resolution tabled under Rule 131:

    MOTION OF CENSURE ON THE COMMISSION (2025/2140(RSP)) (B10-0319/2025)
    Gheorghe Piperea, Adrian-George Axinia, Claudiu-Richard Târziu, Georgiana Teodorescu, Şerban Dimitrie Sturdza, Fidias Panayiotou, Daniel Obajtek, Ivan David, Patryk Jaki, Zsuzsanna Borvendég, Fernand Kartheiser, Nikolaos Anadiotis, Volker Schnurrbusch, Katarína Roth Neveďalová, Irmhild Boßdorf, Virginie Joron, Ondřej Dostál, Cristian Terheş, Christine Anderson, António Tânger Corrêa, Emmanouil Fragkos, Milan Mazurek, Alexander Jungbluth, Siegbert Frank Droese, Petar Volgin, Rada Laykova, Stanislav Stoyanov, Arno Bausemer, Arkadiusz Mularczyk, Bogdan Rzońca, Milan Uhrík, Mary Khan, Tomasz Froelich, Hans Neuhoff, Alexander Sell, René Aust, Petr Bystron, Jacek Ozdoba, Galato Alexandraki, Kosma Złotowski, Waldemar Buda, Tobiasz Bocheński, Małgorzata Gosiewska, Marlena Maląg, Mariusz Kamiński, Dominik Tarczyński, Anna Zalewska, Jadwiga Wiśniewska, Maciej Wąsik, Michał Dworczyk, Alvise Pérez, Luis-Vicențiu Lazarus, Erik Kaliňák, Judita Laššáková, Waldemar Tomaszewski, Ewa Zajączkowska-Hernik, Jaak Madison, Anja Arndt, Marcin Sypniewski, Markus Buchheit, Filip Turek, Friedrich Pürner, Kateřina Konečná, Ľuboš Blaha, Thierry Mariani, Jan-Peter Warnke, Thomas Geisel, Branislav Ondruš, Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă, Monika Beňová, Marc Jongen, Nikola Bartůšek, Grzegorz Braun, Sarah Knafo, Petras Gražulis, Piotr Müller, Gerald Hauser

    Case of Ryan Cornelius in Dubai

    Joint motion for a resolution tabled under Rule 150(5) and Rule 136(4):

    on the case of Ryan Cornelius in Dubai (2025/2796(RSP)) (RC-B10-0328/2025)
    (replacing motions for resolutions B10-0328/2025, B10-0333/2025, B10-0336/2025, B10-0340/2025 and B10-0341/2025)
    Sebastião Bugalho, Seán Kelly, Tomáš Zdechovský, Ingeborg Ter Laak, Isabel Wiseler-Lima, Tomas Tobé, Wouter Beke, Davor Ivo Stier, Łukasz Kohut, Mirosława Nykiel, Michał Wawrykiewicz, Inese Vaidere
    on behalf of the PPE Group
    Yannis Maniatis, Francisco Assis, Aodhán Ó Ríordáin
    on behalf of the S&D Group
    Adam Bielan, Sebastian Tynkkynen, Bogdan Rzońca, Arkadiusz Mularczyk, Waldemar Tomaszewski, Marlena Maląg, Joachim Stanisław Brudziński
    on behalf of the ECR Group
    Petras Auštrevičius, Malik Azmani, Dan Barna, Benoit Cassart, Engin Eroglu, Olivier Chastel, Karin Karlsbro, Ilhan Kyuchyuk, Hilde Vautmans, Lucia Yar
    on behalf of the Renew Group
    Villy Søvndal
    on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

    Arbitrary arrest and torture of Belgian-Portuguese researcher Joseph Figueira Martin in the Central African Republic

    Joint motion for a resolution tabled under Rule 150(5) and Rule 136(4):

    on the arbitrary arrest and torture of Belgian-Portuguese researcher Joseph Figueira Martin in the Central African Republic (2025/2797(RSP)) (RC-B10-0327/2025)
    (replacing motions for resolutions B10-0327/2025, B10-0334/2025, B10-0339/2025 and B10-0342/2025)
    Sebastião Bugalho, Wouter Beke, Ingeborg Ter Laak, Željana Zovko, Isabel Wiseler-Lima, Andrey Kovatchev, Tomas Tobé, Tomáš Zdechovský, Davor Ivo Stier, Łukasz Kohut, Liudas Mažylis, Vangelis Meimarakis, Loránt Vincze, Seán Kelly, Mirosława Nykiel, Michał Wawrykiewicz, Inese Vaidere
    on behalf of the PPE Group
    Yannis Maniatis, Kathleen Van Brempt, Francisco Assis
    on behalf of the S&D Group
    Adam Bielan, Jaak Madison, Alexandr Vondra, Sebastian Tynkkynen, Veronika Vrecionová, Ondřej Krutílek, Michał Dworczyk, Bogdan Rzońca, Arkadiusz Mularczyk, Waldemar Tomaszewski, Małgorzata Gosiewska, Assita Kanko, Marlena Maląg, Joachim Stanisław Brudziński
    on behalf of the ECR Group
    Hilde Vautmans, Oihane Agirregoitia Martínez, Petras Auštrevičius, Malik Azmani, Dan Barna, Benoit Cassart, Olivier Chastel, Engin Eroglu, Svenja Hahn, Karin Karlsbro, Ilhan Kyuchyuk, Nathalie Loiseau, Jan-Christoph Oetjen, Marie-Agnes Strack-Zimmermann, Lucia Yar
    on behalf of the Renew Group
    Saskia Bricmont
    on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

    Urgent need to protect religious minorities in Syria following the recent terrorist attack on Mar Elias Church in Damascus

    Joint motion for a resolution tabled under Rule 150(5) and Rule 136(4):

    on the urgent need to protect religious minorities in Syria following the recent terrorist attack on Mar Elias Church in Damascus (2025/2798(RSP)) (RC-B10-0335/2025)
    (replacing motions for resolutions B10-0335/2025, B10-0344/2025, B10-0345/2025, B10-0346/2025 and B10-0347/2025)
    Sebastião Bugalho, Ingeborg Ter Laak, David McAllister, François-Xavier Bellamy, Andrzej Halicki, Wouter Beke, Željana Zovko, Isabel Wiseler-Lima, Andrey Kovatchev, Tomas Tobé, Ioan-Rareş Bogdan, Tomáš Zdechovský, Davor Ivo Stier, Sander Smit, Elissavet Vozemberg-Vrionidi, Eleonora Meleti, Vangelis Meimarakis, Georgios Aftias, Dimitris Tsiodras, Emmanouil Kefalogiannis, Antonio López-Istúriz White, Matej Tonin, Massimiliano Salini, Łukasz Kohut, Loránt Vincze, Seán Kelly, Mirosława Nykiel, Michał Wawrykiewicz, Inese Vaidere, Michalis Hadjipantela, Miriam Lexmann
    on behalf of the PPE Group
    Yannis Maniatis, Francisco Assis, Marco Tarquinio, Hana Jalloul Muro, Evin Incir, Nikos Papandreou
    on behalf of the S&D Group
    Adam Bielan, Reinis Pozņaks, Alexandr Vondra, Veronika Vrecionová, Ondřej Krutílek, Guillaume Peltier, Marion Maréchal, Nicolas Bay, Laurence Trochu, Małgorzata Gosiewska, Aurelijus Veryga, Bogdan Rzońca, Arkadiusz Mularczyk, Waldemar Tomaszewski, Assita Kanko, Marlena Maląg, Carlo Fidanza, Alberico Gambino, Joachim Stanisław Brudziński
    on behalf of the ECR Group
    Nathalie Loiseau, Oihane Agirregoitia Martínez, Petras Auštrevičius, Malik Azmani, Dan Barna, Engin Eroglu, Svenja Hahn, Karin Karlsbro, Jan-Christoph Oetjen, Urmas Paet, Marie-Agnes Strack-Zimmermann, Hilde Vautmans, Lucia Yar
    on behalf of the Renew Group
    Hannah Neumann
    on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
    Nikolas Farantouris

    Tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictions

    Motions for resolutions tabled under Rule 136(2) to wind up the debate:

    on tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictions (2025/2800(RSP)) (B10-0324/2025)
    Hildegard Bentele
    on behalf of the PPE Group

    on tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictions (2025/2800(RSP)) (B10-0326/2025)
    Martin Schirdewan
    on behalf of The Left Group

    on tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictions (2025/2800(RSP)) (B10-0329/2025)
    Beata Szydło
    on behalf of the ECR Group

    on tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictions (2025/2800(RSP)) (B10-0330/2025)
    Bart Groothuis, Oihane Agirregoitia Martínez, Petras Auštrevičius, Malik Azmani, Dan Barna, Engin Eroglu, Svenja Hahn, Ľubica Karvašová, Ilhan Kyuchyuk, Marie-Agnes Strack-Zimmermann, Hilde Vautmans, Lucia Yar
    on behalf of the Renew Group

    on tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictions (2025/2800(RSP)) (B10-0331/2025)
    Ville Niinistö, Michael Bloss, Majdouline Sbai, Maria Ohisalo, Markéta Gregorová, Sara Matthieu
    on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

    on tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictions (2025/2800(RSP)) (B10-0332/2025)
    Kathleen Van Brempt
    on behalf of the S&D Group

    Joint motion for a resolution tabled under Rule 136(2) and (4):

    on tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictions (2025/2800(RSP)) (RC-B10-0324/2025/REV1)
    (replacing motions for resolutions B10-0324/2025, B10-0329/2025, B10-0330/2025, B10-0331/2025 and B10-0332/2025)
    Hildegard Bentele
    on behalf of the PPE Group
    Kathleen Van Brempt
    on behalf of the S&D Group
    Beata Szydło, Mariusz Kamiński
    on behalf of the ECR Group
    Bart Groothuis, Oihane Agirregoitia Martínez, Petras Auštrevičius, Malik Azmani, Dan Barna, Engin Eroglu, Christophe Grudler, Svenja Hahn, Ľubica Karvašová, Michał Kobosko, Ilhan Kyuchyuk, Nathalie Loiseau, Marie-Agnes Strack-Zimmermann, Hilde Vautmans, Marie-Pierre Vedrenne, Lucia Yar
    on behalf of the Renew Group
    Ville Niinistö
    on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group



    II. Petitions

    Petitions Nos 0818-25 to 1048-25 had been entered in the register on 4 July 2025 and had been forwarded to the committee responsible, in accordance with Rule 232(9) and (10).

    The President had, on 4 July 2025, forwarded to the committee responsible, in accordance with Rule 232(15), petitions addressed to Parliament by natural or legal persons who were not citizens of the European Union and who did not reside, or have their registered office, in a Member State.



    III. Documents received

    The following documents had been received:

    1) from other institutions

    – Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2014/45/EU on periodic roadworthiness tests for motor vehicles and their trailers and Directive 2014/47/EU on the technical roadside inspection of the roadworthiness of commercial vehicles circulating in the Union (COM(2025)0180 – C10-0072/2025 – 2025/0097(COD))
    In accordance with Rules 151(1) and 152(1), the President consults the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on the proposal.
    referred to committee responsible: TRAN

    – Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the registration documents for vehicles and vehicle registration data recorded in national vehicle registers and repealing Council Directive 1999/37/EC (COM(2025)0179 – C10-0073/2025 – 2025/0096(COD))
    In accordance with Rules 151(1) and 152(1), the President consults the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on the proposal.
    referred to committee responsible: TRAN
    opinion: IMCO

    – Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2024/1348 as regards the application of the ‘safe third country’ concept (COM(2025)0259 – C10-0088/2025 – 2025/0132(COD))
    referred to committee responsible: LIBE

    – Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulations (EU) No 765/2008, (EU) 2016/424, (EU) 2016/425, (EU) 2016/426, (EU) 2023/1230, (EU) 2023/1542 and (EU) 2024/1781 as regards digitalisation and common specifications (COM(2025)0504 – C10-0090/2025 – 2025/0134(COD))
    In accordance with Rule 151(1), the President consults the European Economic and Social Committee on the proposal.
    referred to committee responsible: IMCO
    opinion: ENVI

    – Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directives 2000/14/EC, 2011/65/EU, 2013/53/EU, 2014/29/EU, 2014/30/EU, 2014/31/EU, 2014/32/EU, 2014/33/EU, 2014/34/EU, 2014/35/EU, 2014/53/EU, 2014/68/EU and 2014/90/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards digitalisation and common specifications (COM(2025)0503 – C10-0091/2025 – 2025/0133(COD))
    In accordance with Rule 151(1), the President consults the European Economic and Social Committee on the proposal.
    referred to committee responsible: IMCO
    opinion: ENVI, TRAN

    – Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulations (EU) 2016/679, (EU) 2016/1036, (EU) 2016/1037, (EU) 2017/1129, (EU) 2023/1542 and (EU) 2024/573 as regards the extension of certain mitigating measures available for small and medium-sized enterprises to small mid-cap enterprises and further simplification measures (COM(2025)0501 – C10-0092/2025 – 2025/0130(COD))
    In accordance with Rules 151(1) and 152(1), the President consults the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on the proposal.
    referred to committee responsible: ECON, ENVI, LIBE
    opinion: INTA, ITRE, IMCO

    – Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directives 2009/43/EC and 2009/81/EC, as regards the simplification of intra-EU transfers of defence-related products and the simplification of security and defence procurement (COM(2025)0823 – C10-0120/2025 – 2025/0177(COD))
    In accordance with Rule 151(1), the President consults the European Economic and Social Committee on the proposal.
    referred to committee responsible: SEDE, IMCO
    opinion: ITRE

    – Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulations (EC) No 1907/2006, (EC) No 1272/2008, (EU) No 528/2012, (EU) 2019/1021 and (EU) 2021/697 as regards defence readiness and facilitating defence investments and conditions for defence industry (COM(2025)0822 – C10-0121/2025 – 2025/0176(COD))
    In accordance with Rules 151(1) and 152(1), the President consults the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on the proposal.
    referred to committee responsible: SEDE, ENVI, ITRE
    opinion: IMCO

    2) from Members

    – Mathilde Androuët, Gerolf Annemans, Jordan Bardella, Nikola Bartůšek, Christophe Bay, Barbara Bonte, Paolo Borchia, Mireia Borrás Pabón, Marie-Luce Brasier-Clain, Anna Bryłka, Jorge Buxadé Villalba, Susanna Ceccardi, Anna Maria Cisint, Marie Dauchy, Valérie Deloge, Mélanie Disdier, Csaba Dömötör, Marieke Ehlers, Viktória Ferenc, Anne-Sophie Frigout, Angéline Furet, Jean-Paul Garraud, Catherine Griset, András Gyürk, Enikő Győri, Kinga Gál, Roman Haider, Gerald Hauser, György Hölvényi, Virginie Joron, Ondřej Knotek, Vilis Krištopans, Afroditi Latinopoulou, Fabrice Leggeri, Julien Leonardelli, András László, Thierry Mariani, Jorge Martín Frías, Tiago Moreira de Sá, Aleksandar Nikolic, Philippe Olivier, Gilles Pennelle, Pascale Piera, Pierre Pimpie, Jaroslava Pokorná Jermanová, Julie Rechagneux, Julien Sanchez, Silvia Sardone, Ernő Schaller-Baross, Pál Szekeres, Hermann Tertsch, Pierre-Romain Thionnet, Rody Tolassy, Isabella Tovaglieri, Filip Turek, António Tânger Corrêa, Matthieu Valet, Roberto Vannacci, Alexandre Varaut, Séverine Werbrouck and Margarita de la Pisa Carrión. Motion for a resolution on combating the establishment of transnational Islamist networks in Europe (B10-0279/2025)
    referred to committee responsible: LIBE

    – Zsuzsanna Borvendég, Siegbert Frank Droese, Milan Mazurek, Volker Schnurrbusch and Petar Volgin. Motion for a resolution on the escalation in the Middle East following Israel’s attack on Iran (B10-0301/2025)
    referred to committee responsible: AFET
    opinion: SEDE, LIBE



    IV. Decisions to draw up own-initiative reports

    Decisions to draw up own-initiative reports (Rule 55)

    (Following the Conference of Presidents’ decision of 2 July 2025)

    ECON Committee

    – Competition policy – annual report 2025 (2025/2134(INI))

    – Banking Union – annual report 2025 (2025/2136(INI))

    EMPL Committee

    – Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights (2025/2133(INI))
    (opinion: IMCO)

    LIBE Committee

    – Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025 (2025/2135(INI))

    – Public access to documents – report covering the years 2022-2024 (2025/2137(INI))

    PETI Committee

    – Activities of the European Ombudsman – annual report 2024 (2025/2138(INI))

    SANT Committee

    – An EU cardiovascular diseases strategy (2025/2132(INI))

    – Europe’s Beating Cancer Plan (2025/2139(INI))

    (Following the Conference of Presidents’ decision of 8 July 2025)

    SEDE Committee

    – European defence readiness 2030: assessment of needs (2025/2142(INI))
    (opinion: BUDG, ECON, ITRE)

    – Tackling barriers to the single market for defence (2025/2143(INI))
    (opinion: ECON, ITRE, IMCO)

    – Flagship European defence projects of common interest (2025/2144(INI))
    (opinion: ITRE, IMCO)

    Decisions to draw up own-initiative reports (Rule 47)

    (Following the Conference of Presidents’ decision of 2 July 2025)

    EMPL Committee

    – Just transition directive in the world of work: ensuring the creation of jobs and revitalising local economies (2025/2131(INL))

    SANT Committee

    – EU rare disease action plan (2025/2130(INL))



    V. Consent procedure

    Reports with a motion for a non-legislative resolution (consent procedure) (Rule 107(2))

    (Following notification by the Conference of Committee Chairs on 2 July 2025)

    INTA Committee

    – Digital Trade Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Singapore (2025/0009M(NLE) – 2025/0009(NLE))



    ATTENDANCE REGISTER

    Present:

    Aaltola Mika, Abadía Jover Maravillas, Adamowicz Magdalena, Aftias Georgios, Agirregoitia Martínez Oihane, Agius Peter, Agius Saliba Alex, Alexandraki Galato, Allione Grégory, Anadiotis Nikolaos, Anderson Christine, Andersson Li, Andresen Rasmus, Andrews Barry, Andriukaitis Vytenis Povilas, Androuët Mathilde, Angel Marc, Annemans Gerolf, Annunziata Lucia, Antoci Giuseppe, Arias Echeverría Pablo, Arłukowicz Bartosz, Arnaoutoglou Sakis, Arndt Anja, Arvanitis Konstantinos, Asens Llodrà Jaume, Assis Francisco, Attard Daniel, Aubry Manon, Auštrevičius Petras, Axinia Adrian-George, Azmani Malik, Bajada Thomas, Baljeu Jeannette, Ballarín Cereza Laura, Bardella Jordan, Barley Katarina, Barna Dan, Barrena Arza Pernando, Bartulica Stephen Nikola, Bartůšek Nikola, Bausemer Arno, Bay Nicolas, Bay Christophe, Beke Wouter, Beleris Fredis, Bellamy François-Xavier, Benifei Brando, Benjumea Benjumea Isabel, Beňová Monika, Bentele Hildegard, Berendsen Tom, Berger Stefan, Berg Sibylle, Berlato Sergio, Bernhuber Alexander, Biedroń Robert, Bielan Adam, Bischoff Gabriele, Blaha Ľuboš, Blinkevičiūtė Vilija, Blom Rachel, Bloss Michael, Bocheński Tobiasz, Boeselager Damian, Bogdan Ioan-Rareş, Bonaccini Stefano, Bonte Barbara, Borchia Paolo, Borrás Pabón Mireia, Borvendég Zsuzsanna, Borzan Biljana, Bosanac Gordan, Boßdorf Irmhild, Bosse Stine, Botenga Marc, Boyer Gilles, Boylan Lynn, Brandstätter Helmut, Brasier-Clain Marie-Luce, Brejza Krzysztof, Bricmont Saskia, Brnjac Nikolina, Brudziński Joachim Stanisław, Bryłka Anna, Buczek Tomasz, Buda Daniel, Buda Waldemar, Bugalho Sebastião, Buła Andrzej, Bullmann Udo, Buxadé Villalba Jorge, Bystron Petr, Bžoch Jaroslav, Camara Mélissa, Canfin Pascal, Carberry Nina, Carême Damien, Casa David, Caspary Daniel, Cassart Benoit, Castillo Laurent, del Castillo Vera Pilar, Cavazzini Anna, Ceccardi Susanna, Cepeda José, Ceulemans Estelle, Chahim Mohammed, Chaibi Leila, Chastel Olivier, Chinnici Caterina, Christensen Asger, Ciccioli Carlo, Cifrová Ostrihoňová Veronika, Ciriani Alessandro, Cisint Anna Maria, Clausen Per, Cormand David, Corrado Annalisa, Costanzo Vivien, Cotrim De Figueiredo João, Cowen Barry, Cremer Tobias, Crespo Díaz Carmen, Cristea Andi, Crosetto Giovanni, Cunha Paulo, Dahl Henrik, Danielsson Johan, Dauchy Marie, Dávid Dóra, David Ivan, Decaro Antonio, de la Hoz Quintano Raúl, Della Valle Danilo, Deloge Valérie, De Masi Fabio, De Meo Salvatore, Demirel Özlem, Deutsch Tamás, Devaux Valérie, Dibrani Adnan, Diepeveen Ton, Dieringer Elisabeth, Dîncu Vasile, Di Rupo Elio, Disdier Mélanie, Dobrev Klára, Doherty Regina, Doleschal Christian, Dömötör Csaba, Do Nascimento Cabral Paulo, Donazzan Elena, Dorfmann Herbert, Dostalova Klara, Dostál Ondřej, Droese Siegbert Frank, Düpont Lena, Dworczyk Michał, Ecke Matthias, Ehler Christian, Ehlers Marieke, Eriksson Sofie, Erixon Dick, Eroglu Engin, Estaràs Ferragut Rosa, Everding Sebastian, Ezcurra Almansa Alma, Falcă Gheorghe, Falcone Marco, Farantouris Nikolas, Farreng Laurence, Farský Jan, Ferber Markus, Ferenc Viktória, Fernández Jonás, Fidanza Carlo, Fiocchi Pietro, Firmenich Ruth, Fita Claire, Flanagan Luke Ming, Fourlas Loucas, Fourreau Emma, Fragkos Emmanouil, Freund Daniel, Frigout Anne-Sophie, Fritzon Heléne, Froelich Tomasz, Fuglsang Niels, Funchion Kathleen, Furet Angéline, Furore Mario, Gahler Michael, Gál Kinga, Galán Estrella, Gálvez Lina, Gambino Alberico, García Hermida-Van Der Walle Raquel, Garraud Jean-Paul, Gasiuk-Pihowicz Kamila, Geadi Geadis, Gedin Hanna, Geese Alexandra, Geier Jens, Geisel Thomas, Gemma Chiara, Georgiou Giorgos, Gerbrandy Gerben-Jan, Germain Jean-Marc, Gerzsenyi Gabriella, Geuking Niels, Gieseke Jens, Giménez Larraz Borja, Girauta Vidal Juan Carlos, Glavak Sunčana, Glück Andreas, Glucksmann Raphaël, Goerens Charles, Gomart Christophe, Gomes Isilda, Gómez López Sandra, Gonçalves Bruno, Gonçalves Sérgio, González Casares Nicolás, González Pons Esteban, Gosiewska Małgorzata, Gotink Dirk, Gozi Sandro, Grapini Maria, Gražulis Petras, Gregorová Markéta, Grims Branko, Griset Catherine, Gronkiewicz-Waltz Hanna, Groothuis Bart, Grossmann Elisabeth, Grudler Christophe, Guarda Cristina, Guetta Bernard, Guzenina Maria, Győri Enikő, Gyürk András, Hadjipantela Michalis, Hahn Svenja, Haider Roman, Halicki Andrzej, Hansen Niels Flemming, Hassan Rima, Hauser Gerald, Häusling Martin, Hava Mircea-Gheorghe, Heide Hannes, Heinäluoma Eero, Herbst Niclas, Herranz García Esther, Hohlmeier Monika, Hojsík Martin, Holmgren Pär, Homs Ginel Alicia, Humberto Sérgio, Ijabs Ivars, Imart Céline, Incir Evin, Inselvini Paolo, Iovanovici Şoşoacă Diana, Jamet France, Jarubas Adam, Jerković Romana, Jongen Marc, Joński Dariusz, Joron Virginie, Jouvet Pierre, Joveva Irena, Juknevičienė Rasa, Junco García Nora, Jungbluth Alexander, Kabilov Taner, Kalfon François, Kaliňák Erik, Kaljurand Marina, Kalniete Sandra, Kamiński Mariusz, Kanev Radan, Karlsbro Karin, Kartheiser Fernand, Karvašová Ľubica, Katainen Elsi, Kefalogiannis Emmanouil, Kelleher Billy, Keller Fabienne, Kelly Seán, Kemp Martine, Kennes Rudi, Khan Mary, Kircher Sophia, Knafo Sarah, Knotek Ondřej, Kobosko Michał, Köhler Stefan, Kohut Łukasz, Kokalari Arba, Kolář Ondřej, Kollár Kinga, Kols Rihards, Konečná Kateřina, Kopacz Ewa, Körner Moritz, Kountoura Elena, Kovatchev Andrey, Krištopans Vilis, Kruis Sebastian, Krutílek Ondřej, Kubín Tomáš, Kuhnke Alice, Kulja András Tivadar, Kulmuni Katri, Kyllönen Merja, Kyuchyuk Ilhan, Lagodinsky Sergey, Lakos Eszter, Lalucq Aurore, Lange Bernd, Langensiepen Katrin, Laššáková Judita, László András, Latinopoulou Afroditi, Laurent Murielle, Laureti Camilla, Laykova Rada, Lazarov Ilia, Lazarus Luis-Vicențiu, Le Callennec Isabelle, Leggeri Fabrice, Lenaers Jeroen, Leonardelli Julien, Lewandowski Janusz, Lexmann Miriam, Liese Peter, Lins Norbert, Loiseau Nathalie, Løkkegaard Morten, Lopatka Reinhold, López Javi, López-Istúriz White Antonio, Lövin Isabella, Luena César, Łukacijewska Elżbieta Katarzyna, Lupo Giuseppe, McAllister David, Madison Jaak, Maestre Cristina, Magoni Lara, Magyar Péter, Maij Marit, Maląg Marlena, Manda Claudiu, Mandl Lukas, Maniatis Yannis, Mantovani Mario, Maran Pierfrancesco, Marino Ignazio Roberto, Marquardt Erik, Martín Frías Jorge, Martins Catarina, Martusciello Fulvio, Marzà Ibáñez Vicent, Mato Gabriel, Matthieu Sara, Mavrides Costas, Maydell Eva, Mayer Georg, Mazurek Milan, Mažylis Liudas, Mebarek Nora, Mehnert Alexandra, Meimarakis Vangelis, Meleti Eleonora, Mendes Ana Catarina, Mendia Idoia, Mertens Verena, Mesure Marina, Metsola Roberta, Metz Tilly, Mikser Sven, Millán Mon Francisco José, Miranda Paz Ana, Molnár Csaba, Montero Irene, Montserrat Dolors, Morace Carolina, Morano Nadine, Moratti Letizia, Moreira de Sá Tiago, Moreno Sánchez Javier, Moretti Alessandra, Mularczyk Arkadiusz, Müller Piotr, Mullooly Ciaran, Mureşan Siegfried, Muşoiu Ştefan, Nagyová Jana, Nardella Dario, Navarrete Rojas Fernando, Negrescu Victor, Nemec Matjaž, Nerudová Danuše, Nesci Denis, Neuhoff Hans, Neumann Hannah, Niebler Angelika, Niedermayer Luděk, Niinistö Ville, Nikolaou-Alavanos Lefteris, Nikolic Aleksandar, Ní Mhurchú Cynthia, Noichl Maria, Nordqvist Rasmus, Novakov Andrey, Nykiel Mirosława, Obajtek Daniel, Ódor Ľudovít, Oetjen Jan-Christoph, Oliveira João, Olivier Philippe, Omarjee Younous, Ondruš Branislav, Ó Ríordáin Aodhán, Orlando Leoluca, Ozdoba Jacek, Paet Urmas, Pajín Leire, Palmisano Valentina, Panayiotou Fidias, Papadakis Kostas, Pappas Nikos, Pascual de la Parte Nicolás, Patriciello Aldo, Paulus Jutta, Pedro Ana Miguel, Pedulla’ Gaetano, Pellerin-Carlin Thomas, Peltier Guillaume, Penkova Tsvetelina, Pennelle Gilles, Pereira Lídia, Peter-Hansen Kira Marie, Petrov Hristo, Picaro Michele, Picierno Pina, Picula Tonino, Piera Pascale, Pietikäinen Sirpa, Pimpie Pierre, Piperea Gheorghe, de la Pisa Carrión Margarita, Pokorná Jermanová Jaroslava, Polato Daniele, Polfjärd Jessica, Popescu Virgil-Daniel, Pozņaks Reinis, Prebilič Vladimir, Princi Giusi, Protas Jacek, Pürner Friedrich, Rackete Carola, Radev Emil, Radtke Dennis, Rafowicz Emma, Ratas Jüri, Razza Ruggero, Rechagneux Julie, Regner Evelyn, Repp Sabrina, Ressler Karlo, Reuten Thijs, Riba i Giner Diana, Ridel Chloé, Riehl Nela, Rodrigues André, Ros Sempere Marcos, Roth Neveďalová Katarína, Rougé André, Ruissen Bert-Jan, Ruotolo Sandro, Rzońca Bogdan, Saeidi Arash, Salini Massimiliano, Salis Ilaria, Salla Aura, Sánchez Amor Nacho, Sanchez Julien, Sancho Murillo Elena, Saramo Jussi, Sardone Silvia, Šarec Marjan, Satouri Mounir, Saudargas Paulius, Sbai Majdouline, Sberna Antonella, Schaldemose Christel, Schaller-Baross Ernő, Schenk Oliver, Scheuring-Wielgus Joanna, Schieder Andreas, Schilling Lena, Schneider Christine, Schnurrbusch Volker, Schwab Andreas, Scuderi Benedetta, Seekatz Ralf, Sell Alexander, Serrano Sierra Rosa, Sidl Günther, Sienkiewicz Bartłomiej, Simon Sven, Singer Christine, Sinkevičius Virginijus, Sippel Birgit, Sjöstedt Jonas, Śmiszek Krzysztof, Smith Anthony, Smit Sander, Sokol Tomislav, Solier Diego, Solís Pérez Susana, Sommen Liesbet, Sonneborn Martin, Sorel Malika, Sousa Silva Hélder, Søvndal Villy, Staķis Mārtiņš, Stancanelli Raffaele, Ștefănuță Nicolae, Steger Petra, Stier Davor Ivo, Storm Kristoffer, Stöteler Sebastiaan, Stoyanov Stanislav, Strack-Zimmermann Marie-Agnes, Strada Cecilia, Streit Joachim, Strik Tineke, Strolenberg Anna, Sturdza Şerban Dimitrie, Stürgkh Anna, Sypniewski Marcin, Szekeres Pál, Szydło Beata, Tamburrano Dario, Tânger Corrêa António, Tarczyński Dominik, Tarquinio Marco, Tarr Zoltán, Târziu Claudiu-Richard, Tavares Carla, Tegethoff Kai, Temido Marta, Teodorescu Georgiana, Teodorescu Måwe Alice, Terheş Cristian, Ter Laak Ingeborg, Terras Riho, Tertsch Hermann, Thionnet Pierre-Romain, Timgren Beatrice, Tinagli Irene, Tobback Bruno, Tobé Tomas, Tolassy Rody, Tomašič Zala, Tomaszewski Waldemar, Tomc Romana, Tonin Matej, Toom Jana, Topo Raffaele, Torselli Francesco, Tosi Flavio, Toussaint Marie, Tovaglieri Isabella, Toveri Pekka, Tridico Pasquale, Trochu Laurence, Tsiodras Dimitris, Turek Filip, Tynkkynen Sebastian, Uhrík Milan, Vaidere Inese, Valchev Ivaylo, Vălean Adina, Valet Matthieu, Van Brempt Kathleen, Van Brug Anouk, van den Berg Brigitte, Vandendriessche Tom, Van Dijck Kris, Van Lanschot Reinier, Van Leeuwen Jessika, Vannacci Roberto, Van Overtveldt Johan, Van Sparrentak Kim, Varaut Alexandre, Vasconcelos Ana, Vasile-Voiculescu Vlad, Vautmans Hilde, Vedrenne Marie-Pierre, Ventola Francesco, Verheyen Sabine, Veryga Aurelijus, Vešligaj Marko, Vicsek Annamária, Vieira Catarina, Vigenin Kristian, Vincze Loránt, Vind Marianne, Vivaldini Mariateresa, Volgin Petar, von der Schulenburg Michael, Vondra Alexandr, Voss Axel, Vozemberg-Vrionidi Elissavet, Vrecionová Veronika, Vázquez Lázara Adrián, Waitz Thomas, Walsh Maria, Walsmann Marion, Warborn Jörgen, Warnke Jan-Peter, Wąsik Maciej, Wawrykiewicz Michał, Wcisło Marta, Wechsler Andrea, Weimers Charlie, Werbrouck Séverine, Wiesner Emma, Wiezik Michal, Wilmès Sophie, Winkler Iuliu, Winzig Angelika, Wiseler-Lima Isabel, Wiśniewska Jadwiga, Wolters Lara, Yar Lucia, Yon-Courtin Stéphanie, Yoncheva Elena, Zacharia Maria, Zajączkowska-Hernik Ewa, Zalewska Anna, Žalimas Dainius, Zan Alessandro, Zarzalejos Javier, Zdechovský Tomáš, Zdrojewski Bogdan Andrzej, Zijlstra Auke, Zingaretti Nicola, Złotowski Kosma, Zoido Álvarez Juan Ignacio, Zovko Željana, Zver Milan

    Excused:

    Burkhardt Delara, Friis Sigrid, Hazekamp Anja

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Minutes – Thursday, 10 July 2025 – Strasbourg – Final edition

    Source: European Parliament 2

    PV-10-2025-07-10

    EN

    EN

    iPlPv_Sit

    Minutes
    Thursday, 10 July 2025 – Strasbourg

    IN THE CHAIR: Christel SCHALDEMOSE
    Vice-President

    1. Opening of the sitting

    The sitting opened at 09:00.



    2. Council positions at first reading (Rule 64)

    – Position of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2008/98/EC on waste – Adopted by the Council on 23 June 2025 (06978/2/2025 – COM(2025)0388 – C10-0139/2025 – 2023/0234(COD))
    referred to committee responsible: ENVI

    The three-month period available to Parliament under Article 294 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union for it to adopt its position would begin the following day, 11 July 2025.



    3. Post-2027 common agricultural policy (debate)

    Commission statement: Post-2027 common agricultural policy (2025/2791(RSP))

    Christophe Hansen (Member of the Commission) made the statement.

    The following spoke: Herbert Dorfmann, on behalf of the PPE Group, Dario Nardella, on behalf of the S&D Group (the President reminded the speaker of the rules on conduct), Raffaele Stancanelli, on behalf of the PfE Group, Carlo Fidanza, on behalf of the ECR Group, Elsi Katainen, on behalf of the Renew Group, Thomas Waitz, on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group, Luke Ming Flanagan, on behalf of The Left Group, Arno Bausemer, on behalf of the ESN Group, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Cristina Maestre, Mathilde Androuët, Veronika Vrecionová, Barry Cowen, Anna Strolenberg, Arash Saeidi, Sarah Knafo, Katarína Roth Neveďalová, Siegfried Mureşan, André Rodrigues, Mireia Borrás Pabón, who also answered a blue-card question from Ana Miranda Paz, Bert-Jan Ruissen, Asger Christensen, Giuseppe Antoci, David Cormand, Norbert Lins, Camilla Laureti, Gilles Pennelle, Waldemar Buda, Christine Singer, who also answered a blue-card question from Arkadiusz Mularczyk, Cristina Guarda, Konstantinos Arvanitis, Daniel Buda, Vytenis Povilas Andriukaitis, Valérie Deloge, Benoit Cassart, Martin Häusling, Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral, Maria Grapini, Ton Diepeveen, Jacek Ozdoba, Ciaran Mullooly, Pär Holmgren, Péter Magyar, Marko Vešligaj, Barbara Bonte, Michal Wiezik, Jessika Van Leeuwen, Csaba Dömötör and Céline Imart.

    The following spoke under the catch-the-eye procedure: Gabriel Mato, Sebastian Tynkkynen, Ana Miranda Paz, Maria Zacharia, Nina Carberry and Arkadiusz Mularczyk.

    IN THE CHAIR: Pina PICIERNO
    Vice-President

    The following spoke under the catch-the-eye procedure: Francisco José Millán Mon, Maria Walsh, Stefan Köhler and Lefteris Nikolaou-Alavanos.

    The following spoke: Christophe Hansen.

    The debate closed.



    4. European Citizens’ Initiative ‘Cohesion policy for the equality of the regions and sustainability of the regional cultures’ (debate)

    European Citizens’ Initiative ‘Cohesion policy for the equality of the regions and sustainability of the regional cultures’ (2025/2655(RSP)) (Rule 228(8))

    Francesco Ventola and Bogdan Rzońca presented the European Citizens’ Initiative.

    The following spoke: Hadja Lahbib (Member of the Commission).

    The following spoke: Iuliu Winkler, on behalf of the PPE Group, Alex Agius Saliba, on behalf of the S&D Group, Kinga Gál, on behalf of the PfE Group, Antonella Sberna, on behalf of the ECR Group, Raquel García Hermida-Van Der Walle, on behalf of the Renew Group, Vladimir Prebilič, on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group, Siegbert Frank Droese, on behalf of the ESN Group, Gabriella Gerzsenyi, Marcos Ros Sempere, André Rougé, who also answered a blue-card question from Raquel García Hermida-Van Der Walle, Guillaume Peltier, Joachim Streit, Kathleen Funchion, Volker Schnurrbusch, Fidias Panayiotou, Daniel Buda, Hannes Heide, Rody Tolassy, Nora Junco García, Irmhild Boßdorf, who also answered a blue-card question from Arkadiusz Mularczyk, Rosa Estaràs Ferragut, Sabrina Repp, Alexandra Mehnert, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Loránt Vincze, Isilda Gomes, Łukasz Kohut, Sandra Gómez López, Andi Cristea and Sofie Eriksson.

    The following spoke under the catch-the-eye procedure: Gabriel Mato, Viktória Ferenc, Arkadiusz Mularczyk, Oihane Agirregoitia Martínez, Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă, Nikolina Brnjac and Sebastian Tynkkynen.

    The following spoke: Hadja Lahbib.

    The debate closed.

    (The sitting was suspended at 11:51.)



    IN THE CHAIR: Roberta METSOLA
    President

    5. Resumption of the sitting

    The sitting resumed at 12:00.

    ⁂

    The President thanked the Members and Parliament’s staff for their work during the first year of the current parliamentary term.



    6. Voting time

    For detailed results of the votes, see also ‘Results of votes’ and ‘Results of roll-call votes’.



    6.1. Motion of censure on the Commission (vote)

    Motion of censure on the Commission B10-0319/2025 (minutes of 10.7.2025, item I) (2025/2140(RSP))

    (Majority of two thirds of the votes cast, constituting a majority of Parliament’s component Members)

    MOTION OF CENSURE (Rule 131)

    Rejected

    (‘Results of votes’, item 1)

    ⁂

    Özlem Demirel, on the admissibility of an amendment concerning one of the items in voting time (the President gave explanations).



    6.2. Case of Ryan Cornelius in Dubai (vote)

    Motions for resolutions RC-B10-0328/2025 (minutes of 10.7.2025, item I), B10-0328/2025, B10-0333/2025, B10-0336/2025, B10-0340/2025 and B10-0341/2025 (minutes of 9.7.2025, item I) (2025/2796(RSP))

    (Majority of the votes cast)

    JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION

    Adopted (P10_TA(2025)0161)

    (‘Results of votes’, item 2)



    6.3. Arbitrary arrest and torture of Belgian-Portuguese researcher Joseph Figueira Martin in the Central African Republic (vote)

    Motions for resolutions RC-B10-0327/2025 (minutes of 10.7.2025, item I), B10-0323/2025, B10-0327/2025, B10-0334/2025, B10-0339/2025 and B10-0342/2025 (minutes of 9.7.2025, item I) (2025/2797(RSP))

    (Majority of the votes cast)

    JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION

    Adopted (P10_TA(2025)0162)

    (Motion for a resolution B10-0323/2025 fell.)

    (‘Results of votes’, item 3)



    6.4. Urgent need to protect religious minorities in Syria following the recent terrorist attack on Mar Elias Church in Damascus (vote)

    Motions for resolutions RC-B10-0335/2025 (minutes of 10.7.2025, item I), B10-0325/2025, B10-0335/2025, B10-0338/2025, B10-0343/2025, B10-0344/2025, B10-0345/2025, B10-0346/2025 and B10-0347/2025 (minutes of 9.7.2025, item I) (2025/2798(RSP))

    (Majority of the votes cast)

    JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION

    Adopted (P10_TA(2025)0163)

    (Motions for resolutions B10-0325/2025, B10-0338/2025 and B10-0343/2025 fell.)

    (‘Results of votes’, item 4)



    6.5. Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 as regards obligations of economic operators concerning battery due diligence policies ***I (vote)

    Report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 as regards obligations of economic operators concerning battery due diligence policies [COM(2025)0258 – C10-0089/2025 – 2025/0129(COD)] – Committee on the Environment, Climate and Food Safety. Rapporteur: Antonio Decaro (A10-0134/2025)

    (Majority of the votes cast)

    COMMISSION PROPOSAL and AMENDMENTS

    Approved (P10_TA(2025)0164)

    Parliament’s first reading thus closed.

    (‘Results of votes’, item 5)



    6.6. Future of the EU biotechnology and biomanufacturing sector: leveraging research, boosting innovation and enhancing competitiveness (vote)

    Report on the future of the EU biotechnology and biomanufacturing sector: leveraging research, boosting innovation and enhancing competitiveness [2025/2008(INI)] – Committee on Industry, Research and Energy. Rapporteur: Hildegard Bentele (A10-0123/2025)

    (Majority of the votes cast)

    MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION

    Adopted (P10_TA(2025)0165)

    The following had spoken:

    Hildegard Bentele, before the vote, to make a statement pursuant to Rule 165(4).

    (‘Results of votes’, item 6)



    6.7. Tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictions (vote)

    Motions for resolutions RC-B10-0324/2025/REV1, B10-0324/2025, B10-0326/2025, B10-0329/2025, B10-0330/2025, B10-0331/2025 and B10-0332/2025 (minutes of 10.7.2025, item I) (2025/2800(RSP))

    (Majority of the votes cast)

    JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION

    Adopted (P10_TA(2025)0166)

    (Motion for a resolution B10-0326/2025 fell.)

    (‘Results of votes’, item 7)

    (The sitting was suspended at 12:18.)



    IN THE CHAIR: Younous OMARJEE
    Vice-President

    7. Resumption of the sitting

    The sitting resumed at 15:00.



    8. Approval of the minutes of the previous sitting

    The minutes of the previous sitting were approved.



    9. Composition of committees and delegations

    The non-attached Members had notified the President of the following decisions changing the composition of the committees and delegations:

    – FEMM Committee: Fernand Kartheiser

    – Delegation to the OACPS-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly: Fernand Kartheiser

    The decisions took effect as of that day.



    10. Endometriosis: Europe’s wake-up call on the gender health gap (debate)

    Commission statement: Endometriosis: Europe’s wake-up call on the gender health gap (2025/2795(RSP))

    Hadja Lahbib (Member of the Commission) made the statement.

    The following spoke: András Tivadar Kulja, on behalf of the PPE Group, Vytenis Povilas Andriukaitis, on behalf of the S&D Group, Margarita de la Pisa Carrión, on behalf of the PfE Group, Chiara Gemma, on behalf of the ECR Group, Billy Kelleher, on behalf of the Renew Group, Majdouline Sbai, on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group, Catarina Martins, on behalf of The Left Group, Tomasz Froelich, on behalf of the ESN Group, Sirpa Pietikäinen, Evelyn Regner, who also answered a blue-card question from Petras Gražulis, Marie Dauchy, Mariateresa Vivaldini, Tilly Metz, Günther Sidl and Maria Grapini.

    The following spoke: Hadja Lahbib.

    The debate closed.



    11. Oral explanations of votes (Rule 201)



    11.1. Motion of censure on the Commission (B10-0319/2025)
    Cristian Terheş



    11.2. Tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictions (RC-B10-0324/2025)
    Günther Sidl



    12. Explanations of votes in writing (Rule 201)

    Explanations of votes given in writing would appear on the Members’ pages on Parliament’s website.



    13. Approval of the minutes of the sitting and forwarding of texts adopted

    In accordance with Rule 208(3), the minutes of the sitting would be put to the House for approval at the start of the next sitting.

    With Parliament’s agreement, the texts adopted during the part-session would be forwarded to their respective addressees without delay.



    14. Dates of the next part-session

    The next part-session would be held from 8 September 2025 to 11 September 2025.



    15. Closure of the sitting

    The sitting closed at 15:47.



    16. Adjournment of the session

    The session of the European Parliament was adjourned.

    Alessandro Chiocchetti

    Roberta Metsola

    Secretary-General

    President



    LIST OF DOCUMENTS SERVING AS A BASIS FOR THE DEBATES AND DECISIONS OF PARLIAMENT



    I. Motions for resolutions tabled

    Motion of censure on the Commission

    Motion for a resolution tabled under Rule 131:

    MOTION OF CENSURE ON THE COMMISSION (2025/2140(RSP)) (B10-0319/2025)
    Gheorghe Piperea, Adrian-George Axinia, Claudiu-Richard Târziu, Georgiana Teodorescu, Şerban Dimitrie Sturdza, Fidias Panayiotou, Daniel Obajtek, Ivan David, Patryk Jaki, Zsuzsanna Borvendég, Fernand Kartheiser, Nikolaos Anadiotis, Volker Schnurrbusch, Katarína Roth Neveďalová, Irmhild Boßdorf, Virginie Joron, Ondřej Dostál, Cristian Terheş, Christine Anderson, António Tânger Corrêa, Emmanouil Fragkos, Milan Mazurek, Alexander Jungbluth, Siegbert Frank Droese, Petar Volgin, Rada Laykova, Stanislav Stoyanov, Arno Bausemer, Arkadiusz Mularczyk, Bogdan Rzońca, Milan Uhrík, Mary Khan, Tomasz Froelich, Hans Neuhoff, Alexander Sell, René Aust, Petr Bystron, Jacek Ozdoba, Galato Alexandraki, Kosma Złotowski, Waldemar Buda, Tobiasz Bocheński, Małgorzata Gosiewska, Marlena Maląg, Mariusz Kamiński, Dominik Tarczyński, Anna Zalewska, Jadwiga Wiśniewska, Maciej Wąsik, Michał Dworczyk, Alvise Pérez, Luis-Vicențiu Lazarus, Erik Kaliňák, Judita Laššáková, Waldemar Tomaszewski, Ewa Zajączkowska-Hernik, Jaak Madison, Anja Arndt, Marcin Sypniewski, Markus Buchheit, Filip Turek, Friedrich Pürner, Kateřina Konečná, Ľuboš Blaha, Thierry Mariani, Jan-Peter Warnke, Thomas Geisel, Branislav Ondruš, Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă, Monika Beňová, Marc Jongen, Nikola Bartůšek, Grzegorz Braun, Sarah Knafo, Petras Gražulis, Piotr Müller, Gerald Hauser

    Case of Ryan Cornelius in Dubai

    Joint motion for a resolution tabled under Rule 150(5) and Rule 136(4):

    on the case of Ryan Cornelius in Dubai (2025/2796(RSP)) (RC-B10-0328/2025)
    (replacing motions for resolutions B10-0328/2025, B10-0333/2025, B10-0336/2025, B10-0340/2025 and B10-0341/2025)
    Sebastião Bugalho, Seán Kelly, Tomáš Zdechovský, Ingeborg Ter Laak, Isabel Wiseler-Lima, Tomas Tobé, Wouter Beke, Davor Ivo Stier, Łukasz Kohut, Mirosława Nykiel, Michał Wawrykiewicz, Inese Vaidere
    on behalf of the PPE Group
    Yannis Maniatis, Francisco Assis, Aodhán Ó Ríordáin
    on behalf of the S&D Group
    Adam Bielan, Sebastian Tynkkynen, Bogdan Rzońca, Arkadiusz Mularczyk, Waldemar Tomaszewski, Marlena Maląg, Joachim Stanisław Brudziński
    on behalf of the ECR Group
    Petras Auštrevičius, Malik Azmani, Dan Barna, Benoit Cassart, Engin Eroglu, Olivier Chastel, Karin Karlsbro, Ilhan Kyuchyuk, Hilde Vautmans, Lucia Yar
    on behalf of the Renew Group
    Villy Søvndal
    on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

    Arbitrary arrest and torture of Belgian-Portuguese researcher Joseph Figueira Martin in the Central African Republic

    Joint motion for a resolution tabled under Rule 150(5) and Rule 136(4):

    on the arbitrary arrest and torture of Belgian-Portuguese researcher Joseph Figueira Martin in the Central African Republic (2025/2797(RSP)) (RC-B10-0327/2025)
    (replacing motions for resolutions B10-0327/2025, B10-0334/2025, B10-0339/2025 and B10-0342/2025)
    Sebastião Bugalho, Wouter Beke, Ingeborg Ter Laak, Željana Zovko, Isabel Wiseler-Lima, Andrey Kovatchev, Tomas Tobé, Tomáš Zdechovský, Davor Ivo Stier, Łukasz Kohut, Liudas Mažylis, Vangelis Meimarakis, Loránt Vincze, Seán Kelly, Mirosława Nykiel, Michał Wawrykiewicz, Inese Vaidere
    on behalf of the PPE Group
    Yannis Maniatis, Kathleen Van Brempt, Francisco Assis
    on behalf of the S&D Group
    Adam Bielan, Jaak Madison, Alexandr Vondra, Sebastian Tynkkynen, Veronika Vrecionová, Ondřej Krutílek, Michał Dworczyk, Bogdan Rzońca, Arkadiusz Mularczyk, Waldemar Tomaszewski, Małgorzata Gosiewska, Assita Kanko, Marlena Maląg, Joachim Stanisław Brudziński
    on behalf of the ECR Group
    Hilde Vautmans, Oihane Agirregoitia Martínez, Petras Auštrevičius, Malik Azmani, Dan Barna, Benoit Cassart, Olivier Chastel, Engin Eroglu, Svenja Hahn, Karin Karlsbro, Ilhan Kyuchyuk, Nathalie Loiseau, Jan-Christoph Oetjen, Marie-Agnes Strack-Zimmermann, Lucia Yar
    on behalf of the Renew Group
    Saskia Bricmont
    on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

    Urgent need to protect religious minorities in Syria following the recent terrorist attack on Mar Elias Church in Damascus

    Joint motion for a resolution tabled under Rule 150(5) and Rule 136(4):

    on the urgent need to protect religious minorities in Syria following the recent terrorist attack on Mar Elias Church in Damascus (2025/2798(RSP)) (RC-B10-0335/2025)
    (replacing motions for resolutions B10-0335/2025, B10-0344/2025, B10-0345/2025, B10-0346/2025 and B10-0347/2025)
    Sebastião Bugalho, Ingeborg Ter Laak, David McAllister, François-Xavier Bellamy, Andrzej Halicki, Wouter Beke, Željana Zovko, Isabel Wiseler-Lima, Andrey Kovatchev, Tomas Tobé, Ioan-Rareş Bogdan, Tomáš Zdechovský, Davor Ivo Stier, Sander Smit, Elissavet Vozemberg-Vrionidi, Eleonora Meleti, Vangelis Meimarakis, Georgios Aftias, Dimitris Tsiodras, Emmanouil Kefalogiannis, Antonio López-Istúriz White, Matej Tonin, Massimiliano Salini, Łukasz Kohut, Loránt Vincze, Seán Kelly, Mirosława Nykiel, Michał Wawrykiewicz, Inese Vaidere, Michalis Hadjipantela, Miriam Lexmann
    on behalf of the PPE Group
    Yannis Maniatis, Francisco Assis, Marco Tarquinio, Hana Jalloul Muro, Evin Incir, Nikos Papandreou
    on behalf of the S&D Group
    Adam Bielan, Reinis Pozņaks, Alexandr Vondra, Veronika Vrecionová, Ondřej Krutílek, Guillaume Peltier, Marion Maréchal, Nicolas Bay, Laurence Trochu, Małgorzata Gosiewska, Aurelijus Veryga, Bogdan Rzońca, Arkadiusz Mularczyk, Waldemar Tomaszewski, Assita Kanko, Marlena Maląg, Carlo Fidanza, Alberico Gambino, Joachim Stanisław Brudziński
    on behalf of the ECR Group
    Nathalie Loiseau, Oihane Agirregoitia Martínez, Petras Auštrevičius, Malik Azmani, Dan Barna, Engin Eroglu, Svenja Hahn, Karin Karlsbro, Jan-Christoph Oetjen, Urmas Paet, Marie-Agnes Strack-Zimmermann, Hilde Vautmans, Lucia Yar
    on behalf of the Renew Group
    Hannah Neumann
    on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
    Nikolas Farantouris

    Tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictions

    Motions for resolutions tabled under Rule 136(2) to wind up the debate:

    on tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictions (2025/2800(RSP)) (B10-0324/2025)
    Hildegard Bentele
    on behalf of the PPE Group

    on tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictions (2025/2800(RSP)) (B10-0326/2025)
    Martin Schirdewan
    on behalf of The Left Group

    on tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictions (2025/2800(RSP)) (B10-0329/2025)
    Beata Szydło
    on behalf of the ECR Group

    on tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictions (2025/2800(RSP)) (B10-0330/2025)
    Bart Groothuis, Oihane Agirregoitia Martínez, Petras Auštrevičius, Malik Azmani, Dan Barna, Engin Eroglu, Svenja Hahn, Ľubica Karvašová, Ilhan Kyuchyuk, Marie-Agnes Strack-Zimmermann, Hilde Vautmans, Lucia Yar
    on behalf of the Renew Group

    on tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictions (2025/2800(RSP)) (B10-0331/2025)
    Ville Niinistö, Michael Bloss, Majdouline Sbai, Maria Ohisalo, Markéta Gregorová, Sara Matthieu
    on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

    on tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictions (2025/2800(RSP)) (B10-0332/2025)
    Kathleen Van Brempt
    on behalf of the S&D Group

    Joint motion for a resolution tabled under Rule 136(2) and (4):

    on tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictions (2025/2800(RSP)) (RC-B10-0324/2025/REV1)
    (replacing motions for resolutions B10-0324/2025, B10-0329/2025, B10-0330/2025, B10-0331/2025 and B10-0332/2025)
    Hildegard Bentele
    on behalf of the PPE Group
    Kathleen Van Brempt
    on behalf of the S&D Group
    Beata Szydło, Mariusz Kamiński
    on behalf of the ECR Group
    Bart Groothuis, Oihane Agirregoitia Martínez, Petras Auštrevičius, Malik Azmani, Dan Barna, Engin Eroglu, Christophe Grudler, Svenja Hahn, Ľubica Karvašová, Michał Kobosko, Ilhan Kyuchyuk, Nathalie Loiseau, Marie-Agnes Strack-Zimmermann, Hilde Vautmans, Marie-Pierre Vedrenne, Lucia Yar
    on behalf of the Renew Group
    Ville Niinistö
    on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group



    II. Petitions

    Petitions Nos 0818-25 to 1048-25 had been entered in the register on 4 July 2025 and had been forwarded to the committee responsible, in accordance with Rule 232(9) and (10).

    The President had, on 4 July 2025, forwarded to the committee responsible, in accordance with Rule 232(15), petitions addressed to Parliament by natural or legal persons who were not citizens of the European Union and who did not reside, or have their registered office, in a Member State.



    III. Documents received

    The following documents had been received:

    1) from other institutions

    – Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2014/45/EU on periodic roadworthiness tests for motor vehicles and their trailers and Directive 2014/47/EU on the technical roadside inspection of the roadworthiness of commercial vehicles circulating in the Union (COM(2025)0180 – C10-0072/2025 – 2025/0097(COD))
    In accordance with Rules 151(1) and 152(1), the President consults the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on the proposal.
    referred to committee responsible: TRAN

    – Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the registration documents for vehicles and vehicle registration data recorded in national vehicle registers and repealing Council Directive 1999/37/EC (COM(2025)0179 – C10-0073/2025 – 2025/0096(COD))
    In accordance with Rules 151(1) and 152(1), the President consults the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on the proposal.
    referred to committee responsible: TRAN
    opinion: IMCO

    – Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2024/1348 as regards the application of the ‘safe third country’ concept (COM(2025)0259 – C10-0088/2025 – 2025/0132(COD))
    referred to committee responsible: LIBE

    – Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulations (EU) No 765/2008, (EU) 2016/424, (EU) 2016/425, (EU) 2016/426, (EU) 2023/1230, (EU) 2023/1542 and (EU) 2024/1781 as regards digitalisation and common specifications (COM(2025)0504 – C10-0090/2025 – 2025/0134(COD))
    In accordance with Rule 151(1), the President consults the European Economic and Social Committee on the proposal.
    referred to committee responsible: IMCO
    opinion: ENVI

    – Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directives 2000/14/EC, 2011/65/EU, 2013/53/EU, 2014/29/EU, 2014/30/EU, 2014/31/EU, 2014/32/EU, 2014/33/EU, 2014/34/EU, 2014/35/EU, 2014/53/EU, 2014/68/EU and 2014/90/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards digitalisation and common specifications (COM(2025)0503 – C10-0091/2025 – 2025/0133(COD))
    In accordance with Rule 151(1), the President consults the European Economic and Social Committee on the proposal.
    referred to committee responsible: IMCO
    opinion: ENVI, TRAN

    – Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulations (EU) 2016/679, (EU) 2016/1036, (EU) 2016/1037, (EU) 2017/1129, (EU) 2023/1542 and (EU) 2024/573 as regards the extension of certain mitigating measures available for small and medium-sized enterprises to small mid-cap enterprises and further simplification measures (COM(2025)0501 – C10-0092/2025 – 2025/0130(COD))
    In accordance with Rules 151(1) and 152(1), the President consults the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on the proposal.
    referred to committee responsible: ECON, ENVI, LIBE
    opinion: INTA, ITRE, IMCO

    – Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directives 2009/43/EC and 2009/81/EC, as regards the simplification of intra-EU transfers of defence-related products and the simplification of security and defence procurement (COM(2025)0823 – C10-0120/2025 – 2025/0177(COD))
    In accordance with Rule 151(1), the President consults the European Economic and Social Committee on the proposal.
    referred to committee responsible: SEDE, IMCO
    opinion: ITRE

    – Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulations (EC) No 1907/2006, (EC) No 1272/2008, (EU) No 528/2012, (EU) 2019/1021 and (EU) 2021/697 as regards defence readiness and facilitating defence investments and conditions for defence industry (COM(2025)0822 – C10-0121/2025 – 2025/0176(COD))
    In accordance with Rules 151(1) and 152(1), the President consults the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on the proposal.
    referred to committee responsible: SEDE, ENVI, ITRE
    opinion: IMCO

    2) from Members

    – Mathilde Androuët, Gerolf Annemans, Jordan Bardella, Nikola Bartůšek, Christophe Bay, Barbara Bonte, Paolo Borchia, Mireia Borrás Pabón, Marie-Luce Brasier-Clain, Anna Bryłka, Jorge Buxadé Villalba, Susanna Ceccardi, Anna Maria Cisint, Marie Dauchy, Valérie Deloge, Mélanie Disdier, Csaba Dömötör, Marieke Ehlers, Viktória Ferenc, Anne-Sophie Frigout, Angéline Furet, Jean-Paul Garraud, Catherine Griset, András Gyürk, Enikő Győri, Kinga Gál, Roman Haider, Gerald Hauser, György Hölvényi, Virginie Joron, Ondřej Knotek, Vilis Krištopans, Afroditi Latinopoulou, Fabrice Leggeri, Julien Leonardelli, András László, Thierry Mariani, Jorge Martín Frías, Tiago Moreira de Sá, Aleksandar Nikolic, Philippe Olivier, Gilles Pennelle, Pascale Piera, Pierre Pimpie, Jaroslava Pokorná Jermanová, Julie Rechagneux, Julien Sanchez, Silvia Sardone, Ernő Schaller-Baross, Pál Szekeres, Hermann Tertsch, Pierre-Romain Thionnet, Rody Tolassy, Isabella Tovaglieri, Filip Turek, António Tânger Corrêa, Matthieu Valet, Roberto Vannacci, Alexandre Varaut, Séverine Werbrouck and Margarita de la Pisa Carrión. Motion for a resolution on combating the establishment of transnational Islamist networks in Europe (B10-0279/2025)
    referred to committee responsible: LIBE

    – Zsuzsanna Borvendég, Siegbert Frank Droese, Milan Mazurek, Volker Schnurrbusch and Petar Volgin. Motion for a resolution on the escalation in the Middle East following Israel’s attack on Iran (B10-0301/2025)
    referred to committee responsible: AFET
    opinion: SEDE, LIBE



    IV. Decisions to draw up own-initiative reports

    Decisions to draw up own-initiative reports (Rule 55)

    (Following the Conference of Presidents’ decision of 2 July 2025)

    ECON Committee

    – Competition policy – annual report 2025 (2025/2134(INI))

    – Banking Union – annual report 2025 (2025/2136(INI))

    EMPL Committee

    – Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights (2025/2133(INI))
    (opinion: IMCO)

    LIBE Committee

    – Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025 (2025/2135(INI))

    – Public access to documents – report covering the years 2022-2024 (2025/2137(INI))

    PETI Committee

    – Activities of the European Ombudsman – annual report 2024 (2025/2138(INI))

    SANT Committee

    – An EU cardiovascular diseases strategy (2025/2132(INI))

    – Europe’s Beating Cancer Plan (2025/2139(INI))

    (Following the Conference of Presidents’ decision of 8 July 2025)

    SEDE Committee

    – European defence readiness 2030: assessment of needs (2025/2142(INI))
    (opinion: BUDG, ECON, ITRE)

    – Tackling barriers to the single market for defence (2025/2143(INI))
    (opinion: ECON, ITRE, IMCO)

    – Flagship European defence projects of common interest (2025/2144(INI))
    (opinion: ITRE, IMCO)

    Decisions to draw up own-initiative reports (Rule 47)

    (Following the Conference of Presidents’ decision of 2 July 2025)

    EMPL Committee

    – Just transition directive in the world of work: ensuring the creation of jobs and revitalising local economies (2025/2131(INL))

    SANT Committee

    – EU rare disease action plan (2025/2130(INL))



    V. Consent procedure

    Reports with a motion for a non-legislative resolution (consent procedure) (Rule 107(2))

    (Following notification by the Conference of Committee Chairs on 2 July 2025)

    INTA Committee

    – Digital Trade Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Singapore (2025/0009M(NLE) – 2025/0009(NLE))



    ATTENDANCE REGISTER

    Present:

    Aaltola Mika, Abadía Jover Maravillas, Adamowicz Magdalena, Aftias Georgios, Agirregoitia Martínez Oihane, Agius Peter, Agius Saliba Alex, Alexandraki Galato, Allione Grégory, Anadiotis Nikolaos, Anderson Christine, Andersson Li, Andresen Rasmus, Andrews Barry, Andriukaitis Vytenis Povilas, Androuët Mathilde, Angel Marc, Annemans Gerolf, Annunziata Lucia, Antoci Giuseppe, Arias Echeverría Pablo, Arłukowicz Bartosz, Arnaoutoglou Sakis, Arndt Anja, Arvanitis Konstantinos, Asens Llodrà Jaume, Assis Francisco, Attard Daniel, Aubry Manon, Auštrevičius Petras, Axinia Adrian-George, Azmani Malik, Bajada Thomas, Baljeu Jeannette, Ballarín Cereza Laura, Bardella Jordan, Barley Katarina, Barna Dan, Barrena Arza Pernando, Bartulica Stephen Nikola, Bartůšek Nikola, Bausemer Arno, Bay Nicolas, Bay Christophe, Beke Wouter, Beleris Fredis, Bellamy François-Xavier, Benifei Brando, Benjumea Benjumea Isabel, Beňová Monika, Bentele Hildegard, Berendsen Tom, Berger Stefan, Berg Sibylle, Berlato Sergio, Bernhuber Alexander, Biedroń Robert, Bielan Adam, Bischoff Gabriele, Blaha Ľuboš, Blinkevičiūtė Vilija, Blom Rachel, Bloss Michael, Bocheński Tobiasz, Boeselager Damian, Bogdan Ioan-Rareş, Bonaccini Stefano, Bonte Barbara, Borchia Paolo, Borrás Pabón Mireia, Borvendég Zsuzsanna, Borzan Biljana, Bosanac Gordan, Boßdorf Irmhild, Bosse Stine, Botenga Marc, Boyer Gilles, Boylan Lynn, Brandstätter Helmut, Brasier-Clain Marie-Luce, Brejza Krzysztof, Bricmont Saskia, Brnjac Nikolina, Brudziński Joachim Stanisław, Bryłka Anna, Buczek Tomasz, Buda Daniel, Buda Waldemar, Bugalho Sebastião, Buła Andrzej, Bullmann Udo, Buxadé Villalba Jorge, Bystron Petr, Bžoch Jaroslav, Camara Mélissa, Canfin Pascal, Carberry Nina, Carême Damien, Casa David, Caspary Daniel, Cassart Benoit, Castillo Laurent, del Castillo Vera Pilar, Cavazzini Anna, Ceccardi Susanna, Cepeda José, Ceulemans Estelle, Chahim Mohammed, Chaibi Leila, Chastel Olivier, Chinnici Caterina, Christensen Asger, Ciccioli Carlo, Cifrová Ostrihoňová Veronika, Ciriani Alessandro, Cisint Anna Maria, Clausen Per, Cormand David, Corrado Annalisa, Costanzo Vivien, Cotrim De Figueiredo João, Cowen Barry, Cremer Tobias, Crespo Díaz Carmen, Cristea Andi, Crosetto Giovanni, Cunha Paulo, Dahl Henrik, Danielsson Johan, Dauchy Marie, Dávid Dóra, David Ivan, Decaro Antonio, de la Hoz Quintano Raúl, Della Valle Danilo, Deloge Valérie, De Masi Fabio, De Meo Salvatore, Demirel Özlem, Deutsch Tamás, Devaux Valérie, Dibrani Adnan, Diepeveen Ton, Dieringer Elisabeth, Dîncu Vasile, Di Rupo Elio, Disdier Mélanie, Dobrev Klára, Doherty Regina, Doleschal Christian, Dömötör Csaba, Do Nascimento Cabral Paulo, Donazzan Elena, Dorfmann Herbert, Dostalova Klara, Dostál Ondřej, Droese Siegbert Frank, Düpont Lena, Dworczyk Michał, Ecke Matthias, Ehler Christian, Ehlers Marieke, Eriksson Sofie, Erixon Dick, Eroglu Engin, Estaràs Ferragut Rosa, Everding Sebastian, Ezcurra Almansa Alma, Falcă Gheorghe, Falcone Marco, Farantouris Nikolas, Farreng Laurence, Farský Jan, Ferber Markus, Ferenc Viktória, Fernández Jonás, Fidanza Carlo, Fiocchi Pietro, Firmenich Ruth, Fita Claire, Flanagan Luke Ming, Fourlas Loucas, Fourreau Emma, Fragkos Emmanouil, Freund Daniel, Frigout Anne-Sophie, Fritzon Heléne, Froelich Tomasz, Fuglsang Niels, Funchion Kathleen, Furet Angéline, Furore Mario, Gahler Michael, Gál Kinga, Galán Estrella, Gálvez Lina, Gambino Alberico, García Hermida-Van Der Walle Raquel, Garraud Jean-Paul, Gasiuk-Pihowicz Kamila, Geadi Geadis, Gedin Hanna, Geese Alexandra, Geier Jens, Geisel Thomas, Gemma Chiara, Georgiou Giorgos, Gerbrandy Gerben-Jan, Germain Jean-Marc, Gerzsenyi Gabriella, Geuking Niels, Gieseke Jens, Giménez Larraz Borja, Girauta Vidal Juan Carlos, Glavak Sunčana, Glück Andreas, Glucksmann Raphaël, Goerens Charles, Gomart Christophe, Gomes Isilda, Gómez López Sandra, Gonçalves Bruno, Gonçalves Sérgio, González Casares Nicolás, González Pons Esteban, Gosiewska Małgorzata, Gotink Dirk, Gozi Sandro, Grapini Maria, Gražulis Petras, Gregorová Markéta, Grims Branko, Griset Catherine, Gronkiewicz-Waltz Hanna, Groothuis Bart, Grossmann Elisabeth, Grudler Christophe, Guarda Cristina, Guetta Bernard, Guzenina Maria, Győri Enikő, Gyürk András, Hadjipantela Michalis, Hahn Svenja, Haider Roman, Halicki Andrzej, Hansen Niels Flemming, Hassan Rima, Hauser Gerald, Häusling Martin, Hava Mircea-Gheorghe, Heide Hannes, Heinäluoma Eero, Herbst Niclas, Herranz García Esther, Hohlmeier Monika, Hojsík Martin, Holmgren Pär, Homs Ginel Alicia, Humberto Sérgio, Ijabs Ivars, Imart Céline, Incir Evin, Inselvini Paolo, Iovanovici Şoşoacă Diana, Jamet France, Jarubas Adam, Jerković Romana, Jongen Marc, Joński Dariusz, Joron Virginie, Jouvet Pierre, Joveva Irena, Juknevičienė Rasa, Junco García Nora, Jungbluth Alexander, Kabilov Taner, Kalfon François, Kaliňák Erik, Kaljurand Marina, Kalniete Sandra, Kamiński Mariusz, Kanev Radan, Karlsbro Karin, Kartheiser Fernand, Karvašová Ľubica, Katainen Elsi, Kefalogiannis Emmanouil, Kelleher Billy, Keller Fabienne, Kelly Seán, Kemp Martine, Kennes Rudi, Khan Mary, Kircher Sophia, Knafo Sarah, Knotek Ondřej, Kobosko Michał, Köhler Stefan, Kohut Łukasz, Kokalari Arba, Kolář Ondřej, Kollár Kinga, Kols Rihards, Konečná Kateřina, Kopacz Ewa, Körner Moritz, Kountoura Elena, Kovatchev Andrey, Krištopans Vilis, Kruis Sebastian, Krutílek Ondřej, Kubín Tomáš, Kuhnke Alice, Kulja András Tivadar, Kulmuni Katri, Kyllönen Merja, Kyuchyuk Ilhan, Lagodinsky Sergey, Lakos Eszter, Lalucq Aurore, Lange Bernd, Langensiepen Katrin, Laššáková Judita, László András, Latinopoulou Afroditi, Laurent Murielle, Laureti Camilla, Laykova Rada, Lazarov Ilia, Lazarus Luis-Vicențiu, Le Callennec Isabelle, Leggeri Fabrice, Lenaers Jeroen, Leonardelli Julien, Lewandowski Janusz, Lexmann Miriam, Liese Peter, Lins Norbert, Loiseau Nathalie, Løkkegaard Morten, Lopatka Reinhold, López Javi, López-Istúriz White Antonio, Lövin Isabella, Luena César, Łukacijewska Elżbieta Katarzyna, Lupo Giuseppe, McAllister David, Madison Jaak, Maestre Cristina, Magoni Lara, Magyar Péter, Maij Marit, Maląg Marlena, Manda Claudiu, Mandl Lukas, Maniatis Yannis, Mantovani Mario, Maran Pierfrancesco, Marino Ignazio Roberto, Marquardt Erik, Martín Frías Jorge, Martins Catarina, Martusciello Fulvio, Marzà Ibáñez Vicent, Mato Gabriel, Matthieu Sara, Mavrides Costas, Maydell Eva, Mayer Georg, Mazurek Milan, Mažylis Liudas, Mebarek Nora, Mehnert Alexandra, Meimarakis Vangelis, Meleti Eleonora, Mendes Ana Catarina, Mendia Idoia, Mertens Verena, Mesure Marina, Metsola Roberta, Metz Tilly, Mikser Sven, Millán Mon Francisco José, Miranda Paz Ana, Molnár Csaba, Montero Irene, Montserrat Dolors, Morace Carolina, Morano Nadine, Moratti Letizia, Moreira de Sá Tiago, Moreno Sánchez Javier, Moretti Alessandra, Mularczyk Arkadiusz, Müller Piotr, Mullooly Ciaran, Mureşan Siegfried, Muşoiu Ştefan, Nagyová Jana, Nardella Dario, Navarrete Rojas Fernando, Negrescu Victor, Nemec Matjaž, Nerudová Danuše, Nesci Denis, Neuhoff Hans, Neumann Hannah, Niebler Angelika, Niedermayer Luděk, Niinistö Ville, Nikolaou-Alavanos Lefteris, Nikolic Aleksandar, Ní Mhurchú Cynthia, Noichl Maria, Nordqvist Rasmus, Novakov Andrey, Nykiel Mirosława, Obajtek Daniel, Ódor Ľudovít, Oetjen Jan-Christoph, Oliveira João, Olivier Philippe, Omarjee Younous, Ondruš Branislav, Ó Ríordáin Aodhán, Orlando Leoluca, Ozdoba Jacek, Paet Urmas, Pajín Leire, Palmisano Valentina, Panayiotou Fidias, Papadakis Kostas, Pappas Nikos, Pascual de la Parte Nicolás, Patriciello Aldo, Paulus Jutta, Pedro Ana Miguel, Pedulla’ Gaetano, Pellerin-Carlin Thomas, Peltier Guillaume, Penkova Tsvetelina, Pennelle Gilles, Pereira Lídia, Peter-Hansen Kira Marie, Petrov Hristo, Picaro Michele, Picierno Pina, Picula Tonino, Piera Pascale, Pietikäinen Sirpa, Pimpie Pierre, Piperea Gheorghe, de la Pisa Carrión Margarita, Pokorná Jermanová Jaroslava, Polato Daniele, Polfjärd Jessica, Popescu Virgil-Daniel, Pozņaks Reinis, Prebilič Vladimir, Princi Giusi, Protas Jacek, Pürner Friedrich, Rackete Carola, Radev Emil, Radtke Dennis, Rafowicz Emma, Ratas Jüri, Razza Ruggero, Rechagneux Julie, Regner Evelyn, Repp Sabrina, Ressler Karlo, Reuten Thijs, Riba i Giner Diana, Ridel Chloé, Riehl Nela, Rodrigues André, Ros Sempere Marcos, Roth Neveďalová Katarína, Rougé André, Ruissen Bert-Jan, Ruotolo Sandro, Rzońca Bogdan, Saeidi Arash, Salini Massimiliano, Salis Ilaria, Salla Aura, Sánchez Amor Nacho, Sanchez Julien, Sancho Murillo Elena, Saramo Jussi, Sardone Silvia, Šarec Marjan, Satouri Mounir, Saudargas Paulius, Sbai Majdouline, Sberna Antonella, Schaldemose Christel, Schaller-Baross Ernő, Schenk Oliver, Scheuring-Wielgus Joanna, Schieder Andreas, Schilling Lena, Schneider Christine, Schnurrbusch Volker, Schwab Andreas, Scuderi Benedetta, Seekatz Ralf, Sell Alexander, Serrano Sierra Rosa, Sidl Günther, Sienkiewicz Bartłomiej, Simon Sven, Singer Christine, Sinkevičius Virginijus, Sippel Birgit, Sjöstedt Jonas, Śmiszek Krzysztof, Smith Anthony, Smit Sander, Sokol Tomislav, Solier Diego, Solís Pérez Susana, Sommen Liesbet, Sonneborn Martin, Sorel Malika, Sousa Silva Hélder, Søvndal Villy, Staķis Mārtiņš, Stancanelli Raffaele, Ștefănuță Nicolae, Steger Petra, Stier Davor Ivo, Storm Kristoffer, Stöteler Sebastiaan, Stoyanov Stanislav, Strack-Zimmermann Marie-Agnes, Strada Cecilia, Streit Joachim, Strik Tineke, Strolenberg Anna, Sturdza Şerban Dimitrie, Stürgkh Anna, Sypniewski Marcin, Szekeres Pál, Szydło Beata, Tamburrano Dario, Tânger Corrêa António, Tarczyński Dominik, Tarquinio Marco, Tarr Zoltán, Târziu Claudiu-Richard, Tavares Carla, Tegethoff Kai, Temido Marta, Teodorescu Georgiana, Teodorescu Måwe Alice, Terheş Cristian, Ter Laak Ingeborg, Terras Riho, Tertsch Hermann, Thionnet Pierre-Romain, Timgren Beatrice, Tinagli Irene, Tobback Bruno, Tobé Tomas, Tolassy Rody, Tomašič Zala, Tomaszewski Waldemar, Tomc Romana, Tonin Matej, Toom Jana, Topo Raffaele, Torselli Francesco, Tosi Flavio, Toussaint Marie, Tovaglieri Isabella, Toveri Pekka, Tridico Pasquale, Trochu Laurence, Tsiodras Dimitris, Turek Filip, Tynkkynen Sebastian, Uhrík Milan, Vaidere Inese, Valchev Ivaylo, Vălean Adina, Valet Matthieu, Van Brempt Kathleen, Van Brug Anouk, van den Berg Brigitte, Vandendriessche Tom, Van Dijck Kris, Van Lanschot Reinier, Van Leeuwen Jessika, Vannacci Roberto, Van Overtveldt Johan, Van Sparrentak Kim, Varaut Alexandre, Vasconcelos Ana, Vasile-Voiculescu Vlad, Vautmans Hilde, Vedrenne Marie-Pierre, Ventola Francesco, Verheyen Sabine, Veryga Aurelijus, Vešligaj Marko, Vicsek Annamária, Vieira Catarina, Vigenin Kristian, Vincze Loránt, Vind Marianne, Vivaldini Mariateresa, Volgin Petar, von der Schulenburg Michael, Vondra Alexandr, Voss Axel, Vozemberg-Vrionidi Elissavet, Vrecionová Veronika, Vázquez Lázara Adrián, Waitz Thomas, Walsh Maria, Walsmann Marion, Warborn Jörgen, Warnke Jan-Peter, Wąsik Maciej, Wawrykiewicz Michał, Wcisło Marta, Wechsler Andrea, Weimers Charlie, Werbrouck Séverine, Wiesner Emma, Wiezik Michal, Wilmès Sophie, Winkler Iuliu, Winzig Angelika, Wiseler-Lima Isabel, Wiśniewska Jadwiga, Wolters Lara, Yar Lucia, Yon-Courtin Stéphanie, Yoncheva Elena, Zacharia Maria, Zajączkowska-Hernik Ewa, Zalewska Anna, Žalimas Dainius, Zan Alessandro, Zarzalejos Javier, Zdechovský Tomáš, Zdrojewski Bogdan Andrzej, Zijlstra Auke, Zingaretti Nicola, Złotowski Kosma, Zoido Álvarez Juan Ignacio, Zovko Željana, Zver Milan

    Excused:

    Burkhardt Delara, Friis Sigrid, Hazekamp Anja

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Isabel Schnabel: Interview with Econostream Media

    Source: European Central Bank

    Interview with Isabel Schnabel, Member of the Executive Board of the ECB, conducted by David Barwick and Marta Vilar on 9 July 2025

    11 July 2025

    Ms Schnabel, abstracting from the still-open question of tariffs, would you say that developments since 5 June support the idea that the ECB is in a good place, weakening the case for another move?

    Yes, we are in a good place. Disinflation is proceeding broadly as expected, even if services inflation and food inflation remain somewhat elevated. We are now close to having successfully tackled past inflation shocks, which is good news. Over the medium term, inflation is projected to be at 2% and inflation expectations are well anchored. In view of this, our interest rates are also in a good place, and the bar for another rate cut is very high.

    Let me explain. First, I see no risk of a sustained undershooting of inflation over the medium term. Core inflation is projected to be at target over the entire projection horizon. The low energy price inflation is likely to be temporary, and the fear of the exchange rate appreciation putting downward pressure on underlying inflation is exaggerated in my view, as the pass-through is likely to be limited. In fact, this appreciation also reflects the new growth narrative in Europe, meaning there is a positive confidence effect, which attracts capital and lowers financing costs.

    Second, the economy is proving resilient. Economic growth in the first quarter of 2025 was better than expected. Sentiment indicators have also surprised to the upside – the composite Purchasing Managers’ Index rose again in June. And it’s noteworthy that manufacturing has continued to improve, with, strikingly, all the forward-looking indicators having continued their upward trend – new orders, new export orders, future output are all at three-year highs. This suggests that we’re seeing more than just frontloading. Moreover, the labour market remains resilient, with unemployment at a record low and employment continuing to grow. It seems that the uncertainty is weighing less on economic activity than we thought, and on top of that, we’re expecting a large fiscal impulse that will further support the economy. So overall, the risks to the growth outlook in the euro area are now more balanced.

    It sounds like you see no grounds for the ECB to seriously consider further easing, even if it were to wait before moving again.

    There would only be a case for another rate cut if we saw signs of a material deviation of inflation from our target over the medium term. And at the moment, I see no signs of that.

    Is the potential cost of an unnecessary cut high enough to outweigh risk management arguments for a so-called insurance cut?

    I don’t think that risk management considerations can justify another rate cut. Domestic inflation is still elevated and inflation expectations of households and firms are tilted to the upside. Additionally, a more fragmented global economy and a large fiscal impulse pose upside risks to the inflation outlook over the medium term. Therefore, from today’s perspective, a further rate cut is not appropriate.

    I would also warn against fine-tuning monetary policy to incoming data. For example, it would be risky to base a monetary policy decision solely on the evolution of energy prices, because we’ve seen oil prices fluctuate between USD 60 and almost USD 80 since March alone. We should remain firmly focused on the medium term and on core inflation. This is also in line with our updated monetary policy strategy, which says that we need to be agile to recognise fundamental changes in the inflation environment, but that we can tolerate moderate deviations from target if there’s no risk of a de-anchoring of inflation expectations.

    We don’t yet know the final tariff outcome, but observers expect Europe to get away with a general 10%, along with individual tariffs on certain sectors and some exceptions for others. If you share this view, what impact on growth and inflation do you expect?

    Indeed, it looks like tariff negotiations are moving towards our baseline scenario. But of course, there remains uncertainty about the outcome of the negotiations. Tariffs have a dampening effect on economic activity in the short run. However, if the negotiations are concluded successfully, this will lower uncertainty, which would support consumption and investment.

    As regards inflation, I see a net inflationary effect over the medium term, because the dampening effect from a weaker global economy and potential trade diversion is likely to be offset – or even overcompensated – by supply-side effects, which are not included in our standard projection models. This includes cost-push shocks rippling through global value chains, supply chain disruptions and the loss of efficiency from a more fragmented world.

    You said the bar for another rate cut is very high. Is that because we’re approaching accommodative territory? Or are we already in it?

    I think we are becoming accommodative. If you look at the latest bank lending survey, you see 56% of banks reporting that interest rates are boosting the demand for mortgages, while only 8% say they’re holding demand back. Moreover, the natural rate of interest may have increased recently due to the historic shift in German fiscal policy. This is also reflected in financial markets, where real forward rates have moved up, which reflects the expected higher demand for capital, including from the private sector. That means that, for a given level of the policy rate, our policy becomes more accommodative. And this is what’s also reflected in the pick-up in bank lending.

    What other indicators do you rely on to gauge your level of accommodation?

    We look at general economic developments, which also reflect the restrictiveness of our monetary policy. And as I said, the economy has proven more resilient than we had thought.

    You described the pass-through of the EUR/USD exchange rate as limited. Can you be more specific? Is there a point at which this suddenly changes?

    I find the debate about the exchange rate appreciation exaggerated. I do not remember people having a similar concern when the exchange rate was moving towards parity in early 2025. And this did not prevent us from cutting rates further. If you take a longer perspective and look at the past two decades, we’ve had comparable or even larger appreciations with a rather limited impact on inflation.

    There are reasons to believe that the pass-through may be limited this time as well, especially to underlying inflation. First, the source of the shock matters. In this case, the stronger exchange rate is also a reflection of a positive confidence effect and investors’ belief that the euro area’s growth potential may be higher than thought. Moreover, you see a rebalancing of investors into the euro area, which tends to lower financing costs, counteracting the tightening effect of the exchange rate.

    Second, more than half of our imports are invoiced in euro, which reduces the pass-through. Firms may also use the occasion of lower import costs to protect their profit margins rather than pass these lower costs on to consumers.

    Finally, the impact of the exchange rate on competitiveness and foreign demand is mitigated by the high import content of our exports.

    But to get back to your second question, we do not target the exchange rate and we do not respond to any particular exchange rate level. Exchange rates enter our projection models via the assumptions, and we know that they can change in either direction at any point.

    So further appreciation is manageable indefinitely, as long as it remains reasonably gradual?

    We always have to monitor what is happening. I don’t like to make very general statements about what could happen. At the moment, it’s manageable.

    You recently said that the estimate of the impact of higher fiscal spending incorporated into the projections is “relatively conservative”. What’s being underappreciated? Is it the timing? The composition of the spending?

    I see several aspects. The first is indeed timing. We’ve been positively surprised by the frontloading of spending plans by the German government. It seems they’re determined to deliver on their promises. The second aspect is fiscal multipliers. They could be higher than assumed depending on how the money is spent. Generally, they tend to be higher when the money is spent for investment. And the details of defence expenditures also matter: what share is going to be sourced domestically, and what share is used for R&D-related expenditures? A third, very important point is that our models may not fully capture the complementarity between public and private investment – that is, that private investment is being crowded in by public investment. Just recently, a group of large German corporations announced that they are planning a large investment programme, which would amplify the positive effect of public spending.

    How much potential do you see for a stronger-than-anticipated fiscal impulse to alter the inflation outlook and thus your policy calibration in the second half of this year?

    The fiscal measures are going to play out mainly over the medium term, not the short term. But inflation could eventually pick up if the economy hits capacity constraints, also due to demographic developments, which will accelerate over the coming years.

    Your remarks seem to confirm that the ECB is not unhappy about the fact that the US dollar has been weak. Do you see a risk that the public discussion could provoke a US reaction the ECB needs to worry about?

    The current situation risks undermining the exorbitant privilege of the US dollar, a privilege the United States has enjoyed over many decades, which has led to lower financing costs for American households, firms and the government. This offers a historical chance for the euro area to foster the international role of the euro as a global reserve, invoicing and funding currency, to reap some of those benefits. But there are three important prerequisites. The first is a revival of euro area growth. The second is safeguarding the rule of law and security, including in military terms. And the third is a large and liquid EU bond market.

    On the savings and investment union, how can the ECB – while staying within its mandate – play a stronger role in highlighting how structural inefficiencies in cross-border capital flows impede monetary policy transmission and private risk sharing?

    We’ve been very vocal about the savings and investment union. The President has given several speeches and the Governing Council has issued its own communication on the topic. This is because integration is closely related to our mandate. Our monetary policy is more effective in an integrated market. Integration improves monetary policy transmission by increasing private risk sharing and fostering convergence. This is firmly within our mandate. But let me also stress that the savings and investment union is about more than financial integration. It’s about fostering innovation and economic growth. This concerns not just the availability of capital, especially risk capital, but also the possibility for firms to scale up within the Single Market. We know that the internal hurdles within the Single Market are very high – some estimates show they’re much higher than the tariffs that we may be facing from the United States. So, one important part of the savings and investment union is to reduce these barriers within the Single Market. I think the 28th regime for innovative companies is a very promising proposal to allow those companies to scale up easily all over Europe. The ECB can only inform the debate through speeches and analysis, but in the end, progress will depend on the political will of governments.

    Back to the United States, where Donald Trump is calling daily on Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell to resign. In the past 24 hours, we’ve had new speculation about who the next Fed Chair might be. Even if Powell stays to the end of his term, there could be an announcement long before that, and his intended successor may start to make public pronouncements about his intentions that lead to market repricing and an even stronger euro. Does this worry you – and more broadly, are you concerned about any other changes that could disadvantage Europe if a more “Trumpy” Fed Chair emerges?

    The current discussion is testimony to the importance of central bank independence, and the Federal Reserve is leading by example. It’s very dangerous when you have direct interference by governments in monetary policy, because this can destroy the trust that has been built over decades. One concrete advantage of independence is that it reduces risk premia. By challenging Fed independence, risk premia may move up, which would increase rather than lower interest rates. Overall, I would never underestimate the institutional resilience of the Fed, so I remain optimistic.

    Does this optimism also reflect the fact that you just had the opportunity to speak with Chair Powell at the ECB Forum on Central Banking in Sintra, Portugal?

    Absolutely.

    As excess liquidity continues to decline, are you observing any emerging signs of segmentation, whether across jurisdictions or across bank tiers, in the transmission of short-term interest rates?

    There are no signs of segmentation. In fact, with quantitative tightening (QT) proceeding, market functioning has improved because collateral scarcity has gone down. Our new operational framework can deal very well with the heterogeneity across the euro area. Any bank can access our operations at any time, at the same rate, for the amount that they need, based on a broad set of eligible collateral. So far, the banks’ recourse to our operations has been rather limited because excess liquidity is still abundant, and that is also reflected in market funding being more favourable than our operations. Over time, excess liquidity is going to go down, and eventually the situation will change and more and more banks will access our operations. We are observing that process very carefully.

    Even if market function still appears smooth, are there any early indicators you’re watching especially closely?

    We are closely monitoring the functioning of money markets, and we have a whole range of indicators for that, but at the moment, we don’t have any concerns.

    On a related subject, as balance sheet reduction continues, do you see any risk that at some point it could impair monetary policy transmission or disrupt market functioning?

    Not at all. It’s important to understand the functioning of our operational framework, which is designed in a way that ensures smooth monetary policy transmission. In line with our decision, the monetary policy bond portfolios under the asset purchase programme (APP) and the pandemic emergency purchase programme (PEPP) are going to be run down to zero. At some point, once the ECB balance sheet is growing again, we will provide a significant part of banks’ structural liquidity needs via structural operations, namely longer-term lending operations and a structural bond portfolio. But these are distinct from quantitative easing (QE), which remains a tool for exceptional circumstances that is going to be used more sparingly in the future.

    With sovereign spreads generally contained for now, do you view the current pace of the APP rundown as appropriate?

    Yes. It’s running smoothly in the background and our experience with our gradual and predictable approach has been very positive.

    What could trigger a change in the pace?

    To change the pace of QT, you would need to have a monetary policy argument. And we said that our unconventional tools are to be used when we are near the effective lower bound, based on a comprehensive cost-benefit analysis. This is not our situation today. Hence, the plan is to run down the monetary policy bond portfolios to zero. The provision of liquidity for the implementation of our monetary policy won’t be done via QE – which is a stance instrument – but rather via our weekly lending operations and, at a later stage, the structural operations, once excess liquidity has declined to the point where demand for additional central bank liquidity begins to rise.

    The time lag between the cut-off date for the technical assumptions and the publication of the projections is quite long, and in this volatile world it seems that this delay could compromise the reliability of the projections. Is this approach still justified?

    This lag is mainly due to organisational reasons, especially when we are running the projection exercise together with the entire Eurosystem. There is a huge machinery to be managed, with many people to be coordinated, and the outcome then has to be incorporated into the material sent to the Governing Council. The timelines are already very tight. But more fundamentally, your question reveals a common misunderstanding about our projections. In the strategy assessment, we stressed the importance of the uncertainty surrounding our baseline projections. This uncertainty stems from the assumptions, and it also comes from more fundamental uncertainty, like the outcome of tariff negotiations. But it’s a mistake to focus only on the point estimates. What the projections give you is not just this number – which is almost certainly wrong and may change from day to day – but a range of plausible outcomes. This range is what we should focus on, because the point estimates alone may be misleading if you do not also consider the uncertainty.

    To what extent is the return to 2% inflation in 2027 contingent on regulatory measures like the EU’s new emissions trading system ETS2, and does this raise credibility risks if those inputs prove unreliable?

    In general, projecting energy prices is complicated. We are using futures prices in our staff projections even though they are not necessarily a good predictor of energy prices. Here we have an additional complication in that the new ETS has its own uncertainties, such as when it will come and how large its effects are going to be. And this brings me back to the point that we should focus on core inflation, acknowledging that whatever happens with respect to energy – as we’ve seen in the recent inflation surge – may feed into core inflation, especially when prices rise.

    In concluding the strategy assessment, the ECB committed to act forcefully or persistently in response to large, sustained inflation deviations. What criteria would lead you to conclude that it’s appropriate to act forcefully or persistently?

    The strategy assessment implies that we can tolerate moderate deviations from our inflation target as long as inflation expectations are firmly anchored. But when we see a risk of a sustained deviation from the target in either direction that could de-anchor inflation expectations, we will act appropriately forcefully or persistently, depending on the situation at hand and based on a comprehensive cost-benefit analysis. What this means is that first, we have to be agile in order to detect a fundamental shift in the inflation environment. We were lacking this agility at the time of the recent inflation surge, as it took us some time to recognise that we had shifted very quickly from a low-inflation environment to a high-inflation one. We want to be more agile to be able to react to such a change more rapidly. Second, we have to pay a lot of attention to inflation expectations – not just market-based inflation expectations, because these may be subject to a “monkey-in-the-mirror” problem and may merely reflect our own thinking. It’s important to look at a broad set of indicators, including household and firm inflation expectations. And in fact, if you look at the Consumer Expectations Survey, you see that household inflation expectations reacted relatively early to the change in the inflation environment. So, this can give us useful signals.

    And the word “sustained” means extending into the medium term?

    I’m always talking about the medium term, as this is what matters for our monetary policy. But sustained means that it’s not just temporary, and we all know that it’s difficult to judge whether something is temporary or not, but we will have to deal with that in the future.

    In the wake of the strategy assessment, does anything change about the weights you attach to model-based outputs, your judgement or real-time indicators?

    What I think is changing is our approach to data dependence. Over the past few years, data dependence played a very important role: the incoming data served as a cross-check to verify whether the data were in line with the projected decline in inflation over time. This allowed us to cut interest rates at a time when domestic inflation was still elevated. Now we’ve entered a new phase in which we are using incoming data to assess whether there could be a sustained deviation of inflation from target over the medium term. Scenario analysis helps us to navigate the uncertainty that we are facing, and the incoming data can tell us which scenario is most likely to materialise. Of course, projection models have their shortcomings, and we have to continuously improve the models, as we’ve done over recent years. For example, in our analysis of the impact of tariffs on economic activity, trade policy uncertainty played a very important role, but now we’re seeing that the economy is more resilient than we expected. This could be an indication that the impact of trade policy uncertainty is smaller than thought. Another example is the modelling of the supply-side effects of tariffs, which are currently not in our projection models.

    How do you evaluate the prospects for Germany to emerge from the economic doldrums?

    Germany has been facing severe structural weaknesses and a loss in competitiveness. To escape stagnation, it will have to implement growth-enhancing policies. The fiscal package is one important ingredient. But just spending money will not be enough. First, you have to make sure that the money is spent wisely, meaning on investment, not consumption. Second, the spending has to be accompanied by comprehensive structural reforms, including of the social security system, especially given demographic developments. We see a clear turnaround in sentiment in the German economy. But now the German government has to deliver. I see a chance to escape low growth, and this chance should not be wasted.

    So, you share the optimism expressed by Bundesbank President Joachim Nagel earlier this week?

    Yes, I’m also optimistic.

    And with regard to the change in the German attitude towards fiscal spending, what do you think the implications are for euro area growth and inflation?

    Germany is in a situation in which it can expand its government spending, because it has fiscal space. If done properly, this can help increase potential growth, which would also have positive spillovers to the rest of the euro area. This may go along with higher interest rate costs, but if potential growth increases at the same time, this is manageable.

    Traditionally, we’ve had the core, rather fiscally conservative countries of the euro area on the one hand, and the more fiscally relaxed periphery countries on the other. Do you see this division being blurred as a consequence of the new German fiscal attitude?

    Germany is in a very different position from countries like France and Italy. Those countries are facing much more difficult decisions. When they want to increase defence spending as foreseen, they will have to reduce their spending elsewhere, which is politically very demanding. So, I think the difference in the fiscal situations is still there.

    When you speak publicly, how do you balance your own preferences and own views with the need to represent the ECB and its institutional interests?

    One always has to strike the right balance, but I believe that the transparency about the diversity of views within the Governing Council is a feature, not a bug. It enhances our credibility. It also helps market participants better understand the discussions in the Governing Council and detect certain shifts in policies before the decision has been taken. That ultimately helps the transmission of our monetary policy. I have always been loyal to our collegial decisions, and I try to explain their rationale in public. But of course, when I see important new narratives that are relevant for the monetary policy discussion, I express my views. I explain them in comprehensive speeches based on empirical analysis, and I hope that that helps the debate.

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: Import and Export (Amendment) Ordinance 2025 gazetted

    Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region

    Import and Export (Amendment) Ordinance 2025 gazetted 
         A spokesman for the Commerce and Economic Development Bureau said, “We are grateful to the Legislative Council for passing the relevant bill to provide the legal basis for the implementation of TSW Phase 3, achieving another important milestone on trade facilitation. The TSW not only overhauls and enhances the document submission workflows between participating government agencies and the trade, but also enhances the efficiency of cargo clearance in Hong Kong and helps consolidate Hong Kong’s status as an international trade centre and a logistics hub. The Government is pressing ahead with the development and testing of the information technology (IT) system of TSW Phase 3, with the target of rolling out the services by batches from 2026 onwards.”
     
         The Government is implementing the TSW in three phases to provide a one-stop electronic platform for the trade to lodge business-to-government trade documents for trade declaration and cargo clearance. Phase 1 and Phase 2 of the TSW have been in full service since 2020 and 2023 respectively, covering 42 types of trade documents in total. Phase 3 is the final and most complex phase of the TSW. It involves a large volume of documents submitted by a wide range of stakeholders, covering Import and Export Declarations (TDEC), cargo information required to be submitted under different transport modes (including Advance Cargo Information, Cargo Manifests and Cargo Reports), and applications for Certificates of Origin and Dutiable Commodities Permits. The IT system of Phase 3 will replace the long-established GETS and major cargo clearance systems of the Hong Kong Customs and Excise Department (C&ED), and the trade will be required to use the TSW to submit relevant trade documents.
     
         Features of Phase 3 include:     To provide sufficient time for the trade to migrate to the new system, the Amendment Ordinance has included provisions on transitional arrangements to allow parallel run of TSW Phase 3 and GETS for a certain period of time. The C&ED will also launch a series of publicity, promotion and training programmes and provide support services prior to the rollout of Phase 3 services to ensure a smooth transition for the trade.
     
         The main provisions of the Amendment Ordinance come into operation today, except for some provisions relating to the deletion of the existing legal framework of GETS, which shall take effect on a day to be designated by the Commissioner of Customs and Excise by notice published in the Gazette.
    Issued at HKT 11:00

    NNNN

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News –

  • MIL-OSI: Artisan Partners Asset Management Inc. Reports June 2025 Assets Under Management

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    MILWAUKEE, July 10, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Artisan Partners Asset Management Inc. (NYSE: APAM) today reported that its preliminary assets under management (“AUM”) as of June 30, 2025 totaled $175.5 billion. Artisan Funds and Artisan Global Funds accounted for $85.6 billion of total firm AUM, while separate accounts and other AUM1 accounted for $89.9 billion.

    PRELIMINARY ASSETS UNDER MANAGEMENT BY STRATEGY2    
         
    As of June 30, 2025 – ($ Millions)    
    Growth Team    
    Global Opportunities $20,065  
    Global Discovery 1,885  
    U.S. Mid-Cap Growth 11,118  
    U.S. Small-Cap Growth 2,841  
    Franchise 839  
    Global Equity Team    
    Global Equity 388  
    Non-U.S. Growth 14,773  
    U.S. Value Team    
    Value Equity 5,203  
    U.S. Mid-Cap Value 2,546  
    Value Income         16  
    International Value Group    
    International Value 50,062  
    International Explorer 788  
    Global Special Situations 21  
    Global Value Team    
    Global Value 32,569  
    Select Equity 337  
    Sustainable Emerging Markets Team    
    Sustainable Emerging Markets 2,047  
    Credit Team    
    High Income 12,689  
    Credit Opportunities 319  
    Floating Rate 88  
    Developing World Team    
    Developing World 4,784  
    Antero Peak Group    
    Antero Peak 2,272  
    Antero Peak Hedge 268  
    International Small-Mid Team    
    Non-U.S. Small-Mid Growth 5,856  
    EMsights Capital Group    
    Global Unconstrained 965  
    Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities 1,133  
    Emerging Markets Local Opportunities 1,673  
         
    Total Firm Assets Under Management (“AUM”) $175,545  

    1 Separate account and other AUM consists of the assets we manage in or through vehicles other than Artisan Funds or Artisan Global Funds. Separate account and other AUM includes assets we manage in traditional separate accounts, as well as assets we manage in Artisan-branded collective investment trusts, and in our own private funds.
    2 AUM for Artisan Sustainable Emerging Markets and U.S. Mid-Cap Growth Strategies includes $115.4 million in aggregate for which Artisan Partners provides investment models to managed account sponsors (reported on a lag not exceeding one quarter).

    ABOUT ARTISAN PARTNERS
    Artisan Partners is a global investment management firm that provides a broad range of high value-added investment strategies to sophisticated clients around the world. Since 1994, the firm has been committed to attracting experienced, disciplined investment professionals to manage client assets. Artisan Partners’ autonomous investment teams oversee a diverse range of investment strategies across multiple asset classes. Strategies are offered through various investment vehicles to accommodate a broad range of client mandates.

    Investor Relations Inquiries: 866.632.1770 or ir@artisanpartners.com
    Source: Artisan Partners Asset Management Inc.

    The MIL Network –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Tackling aviation contrails – E-001706/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Commission has been actively supporting research efforts to better understand and address the impact of contrails on the climate for over 35 years.

    It is indeed due to these EU and national efforts that we have the present level of understanding and global leadership in this domain. As we work towards implementing effective contrail avoidance practices, our current focus remains on tackling all aviation emissions in the most effective manner.

    The Commission is currently working on fuel composition and exploring possible ways to improving jet fuel quality to reduce aromatics and sulphur levels lowering the amounts of non-CO2-emissions stemming from fuel consumption.

    Similarly, the ReFuelEU Aviation Regulation[1] and the increased adoption of specific types of sustainable aviation fuels are expected to contribute to the decrease of contrail formation that affect non-CO2 climate impacts.

    In addition, the climate impacts of non-CO2 are already being monitored and reported following the entry into applicability of the Measurement Reporting and Verification framework as of 1 January 2025, as part of the EU Emissions Trading System Directive.

    Financial opportunities for contrail avoidance and sustainable aviation are available through EU funding programmes[2]. For example, the ‘dynamic collaboration to generalize eco-friendly trajectories’ (CONCERTO)[3] aims to demonstrate that more environmental trajectories and climate mitigation measures can be implemented in the daily operations to reduce CO2 and non-CO2 emissions.

    All the above EU research projects and many other national ones (e.g Climaviation[4] and LUFO[5]) are expected to ensure a rapid and holistic reduction of all non-CO2 emissions (including contrails).

    • [1] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2023/2405.
    • [2] For example Horizon Europe, PACIFIC, UNIC, E_CONTRAIL, BECOM, CICONIA, as well as the Single European Sky ATM Research 3 Joint Undertaking and the EU ETS Innovation Fund.
    • [3] https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/101114785.
    • [4] https://climaviation.fr/en/research-focus/contrails/.
    • [5] https://www.bauhaus-luftfahrt.net/en/projects/project-airtime-reducing-co2-emissions-and-contrails-with-advanced-wing-technologies.
    Last updated: 10 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Possible double counting of CO2 and distortions caused by unclear rules on the use of subsidised options such as biomethane to meet requirements – E-001494/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    Under Directive (EU) 2018/2001 (Renewable Energy Directive — RED)[1], greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reductions are counted towards Member States’ renewable energy targets, while under Regulation (EU) 2023/1805 (FuelEU)[2] shipping companies are the obligated parties.

    FuelEU does not exclude emissions reductions supported via other legal frameworks, such as the support schemes under RED, as doing so might lead to competitive disadvantages for the sector, and slow down investments in decarbonised marine fuels.

    Support schemes under RED are specified as transposed by the Member States, taking in consideration the national energy policies’ features and priorities.

    FuelEU enforcement relies on the well-established framework of the EU Monitoring, Reporting, and Verification Maritime Regulation[3] used by Member States’ Competent Authorities.

    Shipping companies have to certify fuels’ sustainability using RED traceability rules and governance for all fuel batches claimed to count towards their obligation under FuelEU.

    The traceability system of the Union database, deployed under Article 31a of RED, will be applied. Thus, fuel volumes and emissions reductions reported under FuelEU and RED can be tracked and verified.

    Beyond dedicated webinars, updated THETIS-MRV[4] tutorials, and dedicated helpdesk support, the Commission will adopt its guidance document for FuelEU Implementation in the second semester of 2025.

    The provision in the EU emission trading system (ETS) Directive 2003/87/EC[5] on avoiding double counting of emissions applies to the reporting and surrendering of allowances within the ETS compliance framework.

    It does not apply — but rather exerts synergetic effects — to emission reductions in sectoral regulations with which it is complementary, FuelEU being one such case.

    • [1] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A02018L2001-20240716.
    • [2] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2023/1805/oj/eng.
    • [3]  Regulation (EU) 2015/757: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2015/757/oj/eng.
    • [4] https://mrv.emsa.europa.eu/.
    • [5] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2003/87/oj/eng.

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI: Passwords on Post-Its: 2025 Cybersecurity Pulse Survey uncovers alarming employee behaviors

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    NEW YORK, July 10, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Traliant, a leader in online compliance training, today released its latest research, The State of Cyber: 2025 Cybersecurity Pulse Survey, highlighting a persistent gap between cybersecurity awareness and practice — including risky employee habits that leave organizations vulnerable to increasingly sophisticated cyberattacks.

    Based on a survey of over 600 full-time US employees across various industries, the research found:

    • 18% of employees reuse passwords across work accounts, creating cascading risk if one account is compromised.
    • 23% write down passwords, exposing credentials to loss or theft.
    • Only 30% use password managers and less than half (46%) consistently use multi-factor authentication (MFA).
    • 42% have accessed sensitive company information on personal devices without IT approval.
    • 78% say they’re not fully confident in spotting more advanced phishing attacks like deepfakes or voice spoofing.
    • 40% report that current cybersecurity training doesn’t feel relevant to their day-to-day responsibilities.

    “AI engineered cyberthreats have become more complex, harder to detect, and exploit employee behaviors,” said John Brushwood, Compliance Counsel at Traliant. “Organizations must rethink how they engage employees around cybersecurity because today’s threats are no longer a tech-only issue — they’re a human one. It’s critical for HR and IT to work together to make a measurable impact on building a stronger culture of cyber vigilance.”

    The survey emphasizes the importance of equipping employees with training that is relatable, actionable and provides practical tools and real-world scenarios to build and reinforce cyber awareness — not just to reduce security risks, but to foster a culture of accountability. The report follows the recent release of Traliant’s Cybersecurity solution, which takes a multi-layered approach to threat prevention by combining a 30-minute Cybersecurity Awareness training course, interactive Phishing Simulations, and quarterly Microlearning courses on topics like AI-enabled threats and social engineering. This comprehensive program empowers employees to recognize, prevent and respond to cyber risks year-round.

    Read the full Cybersecurity Pulse Survey report here.

    Expanding privacy protection: Protecting health data with new HIPAA training
    As cyber threats increasingly target sensitive personal and health data, organizations must also reinforce their data privacy practices. In response, Traliant has enhanced its HIPAA training and introduced a new 15-minute refresher course – an efficient option for employees who’ve already completed the full training, offering a streamlined way to reinforce key concepts. Created with oversight from in-house legal and compliance experts, the updated training helps covered entities and business associates comply with federal HIPAA regulations and better safeguard protected health information (PHI).

    “Having confidence that your workforce understands HIPAA is essential — not just to avoid costly penalties, but to uphold patient trust,” adds Brushwood.

    The HIPAA course combines interactive scenarios and clear guidance on state laws, breach notification rules, and key administrative, technical and physical safeguards — all aligned with the HITECH Act and current state-level privacy standards.

    About the Survey
    The independent market research firm Researchscape conducted this online survey of 656 US-employed adults across healthcare, hospitality, retail, industrial, manufacturing, and in-office/professional sectors. Participants work at organizations with 100+ employees. The survey was conducted from March 28 to April 1, 2025.

    About Traliant 
    Traliant, a leader in compliance training, is on a mission to help make workplaces better, for everyone. Committed to a customer promise of “compliance you can trust, training you will love,” Traliant delivers continuously compliant online courses, backed by an unparalleled in-house legal team, with engaging, story-based training designed to create truly enjoyable learning experiences.

    Traliant supports over 14,000 organizations worldwide with a library of curated essential courses to broaden employee perspectives, achieve compliance and elevate workplace culture, including sexual harassment training, inclusion training, code of conduct training, and a comprehensive cybersecurity solution.

    Backed by PSG, a leading growth equity firm, Traliant holds a coveted position on Inc.’s 5000 fastest-growing private companies in America for four consecutive years, along with numerous awards for its products and workplace culture. For more information, visit http://www.traliant.com and follow us on LinkedIn.

    Contact
    Reagan Bennet
    traliant@v2comms.com

    The MIL Network –

  • MIL-OSI: Byrna Technologies Reports Fiscal Second Quarter 2025 Results

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    ANDOVER, Mass., July 10, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Byrna Technologies Inc. (“Byrna” or the “Company”) (Nasdaq: BYRN), a personal defense technology company specializing in the development, manufacture, and sale of innovative less-lethal personal security solutions, today reported select financial results for its fiscal second quarter ended May 31, 2025.

    Fiscal Second Quarter 2025 and Recent Operational Highlights

    • Launched the Byrna Compact Launcher (CL), a 38% smaller launcher than the flagship Byrna SD that delivers the same force per square inch as the Byrna LE. The CL is now available for purchase on Amazon and is featured in Amazon’s Prime Day sales event from July 8-11, 2025.
    • Expanded Byrna’s store-within-a-store concept with Sportsman’s Warehouse, now operating in 12 stores with an additional 10 stores expected to open in the third quarter.
    • Successfully ramping company-owned retail locations launched earlier this year. Byrna’s five locations combined averaged $69,000 in sales during May. Notably, the Scottsdale location reached a sales run rate comparable to Byrna’s long-established Las Vegas store within just a few months of opening.
    • Added Tucker Carlson to the roster of celebrity influencers to amplify brand awareness and promote the normalization of less-lethal solutions.

    Fiscal Second Quarter 2025 Financial Results
    Results compare the fiscal second quarter ended May 31, 2025 (“Q2 2025”) to the fiscal second quarter ended May 31, 2024 (“Q2 2024”) unless otherwise indicated.

    Net revenue for Q2 2025 grew 41% year-over-year to $28.5 million from $20.3 million in Q2 2024. The strong year-over-year growth was primarily attributable to the launch of the CL, increased dealer sales, and broader brand adoption.

    Gross profit for Q2 2025 increased to $17.6 million (62% of net revenue) from $12.6 million (62% of net revenue) in Q2 2024, reflecting the strong increase in sales. The introduction of the CL contributed to a favorable product sales mix that offset any decrease due to a change in channel mix which resulted in stronger dealer sales.

    Operating expenses for Q2 2025 were $14.2 million, compared to $10.6 million for Q2 2024. The increase was primarily due to higher variable selling expenses, payroll costs, and increased discretionary marketing spend.

    Net income for Q2 2025 was $2.4 million, an increase from $2.1 million for Q2 2024, driven by an overall increase in product sales which was partially offset with higher income tax expense for the quarter.

    Adjusted EBITDA1, a non-GAAP metric reconciled below, for Q2 2025 totaled $4.3 million, compared to $2.8 million in Q2 2024.

    Cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities at May 31, 2025 totaled $13.0 million compared to $25.7 million at November 30, 2024. The decrease reflects the planned increase in inventory ahead of the Compact Launcher release and normal seasonal working capital movements. Inventory at May 31, 2025 totaled $32.3 million, compared to $20.0 million at November 30, 2024. The Company has no current or long-term debt.

    Management Commentary
    Byrna CEO Bryan Ganz stated: “The launch of the Byrna CL in May helped us deliver a record $28.5 million in revenue for the second quarter. Despite overall softness in consumer spending, our focused marketing and retail expansion strategies allowed us to continue growing our total addressable market and reach new milestones. Looking ahead, we expect that the CL will be a larger part of our sales mix, especially now that it is available to customers on Amazon.

    “Our dealer channel is also becoming a larger percentage of total sales, increasing 106% in the second quarter, supported by our partnership with Sportsman’s Warehouse. We’ve successfully rolled out the first 12 store-within-a-store locations and plan to add another 10 stores in the third quarter in addition to 38 stores with a point of sale display.

    “Our company-owned stores continue to outperform expectations, with five locations collectively averaging $69,000 in sales during May. Our Scottsdale location, which has only been open for a few months, is already performing at levels similar to our longstanding retail store in Las Vegas. We believe our company-owned stores will continue to perform well and become strong contributors as we further increase local and national brand awareness.

    “On the marketing front, we continue to diversify our approach. We recently added Tucker Carlson to our roster of celebrity influencers, and while it is still early, initial web traffic trends have been encouraging. Additionally, we’ve begun integrating AI tools into our content production, which is already helping us accelerate creative testing and expand our marketing reach.

    “Operationally, we have adjusted production to align with current demand following the CL launch and elevated inventory build. Ahead of the CL debut, production was running heavy in an effort to prepare for the launch. We are now producing at a steady state pace of 15,000 units per month and have implemented a more efficient assembly structure that allows us to maintain output with a smaller, more agile workforce.

    “Looking ahead, we expect consumer sentiment to remain subdued, which may continue to limit near-term revenue upside. However, we are confident that the growing momentum of the CL and our expanding retail presence position us well to deliver strong year-over-year growth in the second half of the year. We also expect our cash position to increase as our heightened inventory levels normalize over the coming quarters. While the third quarter is typically a seasonally slower period for Byrna, we remain focused on executing against our operational priorities, expanding market awareness, and setting the stage for a strong finish to the year.”

    Conference Call
    The Company’s management will host a conference call today, July 10, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. Eastern time (6:00 a.m. Pacific time) to discuss these results, followed by a question-and-answer period.

    Toll-Free Dial-In: 877-709-8150
    International Dial-In: +1 201-689-8354
    Confirmation: 13754369

    Please call the conference telephone number 5-10 minutes prior to the start time of the conference call. An operator will register your name and organization. If you have any difficulty connecting with the conference call, please contact Gateway Group at 949-574-3860.

    The conference call will be broadcast live and available for replay here and via the Investor Relations section of Byrna’s website.

    About Byrna Technologies Inc.
    Byrna is a technology company specializing in the development, manufacture, and sale of innovative less-lethal personal security solutions. For more information on the Company, please visit the corporate website here or the Company’s investor relations site here. The Company is the manufacturer of the Byrna® CL, Byrna® LE and Byrna® SD personal security devices, state-of-the-art handheld CO2 powered launchers designed to provide a less-lethal alternative to a firearm for the consumer, private security, and law enforcement markets. To purchase Byrna products, visit the Company’s e-commerce store.

    Forward-Looking Statements
    This news release contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the securities laws. All statements contained in this news release, other than statements of current and historical fact, are forward-looking. Often, but not always, forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of words such as “plans,” “expects,” “intends,” “anticipates,” and “believes” and statements that certain actions, events or results “may,” “could,” “would,” “should,” “might,” “occur,” or “be achieved,” or “will be taken.” Forward-looking statements include descriptions of currently occurring matters which may continue in the future. Forward-looking statements in this news release include but are not limited to our statements related to our expected sales during the second half of fiscal year 2025, the expected expansion of Byrna’s store-within-a-store partnership with Sportsman’s Warehouse, expected sales trends for the Byrna CL, Byrna’s expectations regarding sales at its retail stores, benefits from new marketing partnerships, the expected benefits from AI integration with manufacturing and testing, the expected benefits from a leaner workforce, expectations regarding consumer sentiment and seasonal sales variations, and potential increases in our cash position. Forward-looking statements are not, and cannot be, a guarantee of future results or events. Forward-looking statements are based on, among other things, opinions, assumptions, estimates, and analyses that, while considered reasonable by the Company at the date the forward-looking information is provided, inherently are subject to significant risks, uncertainties, contingencies, and other factors that may cause actual results and events to be materially different from those expressed or implied.

    Any number of risk factors could affect our actual results and cause them to differ materially from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements in this news release, including, but not limited to, disappointing market responses to current or future products or services; prolonged, new, or exacerbated disruption of our supply chain; the further or prolonged disruption of new product development; production or distribution disruption or delays in entry or penetration of sales channels due to inventory constraints, competitive factors, increased transportation costs or interruptions, including due to weather, flooding or fires; prototype, parts and material shortages, particularly of parts sourced from limited or sole source providers; determinations by third party controlled distribution channels, including Amazon, not to carry or reduce inventory of the Company’s products; determinations by advertisers or social media platforms, or legislation that prevents or limits marketing of some or all Byrna products; the loss of marketing partners; increases in marketing expenditure may not yield expected revenue increases; potential cancellations of existing or future orders including as a result of any fulfillment delays, introduction of competing products, negative publicity, or other factors; product design or manufacturing defects or recalls; litigation, enforcement proceedings or other regulatory or legal developments; changes in consumer or political sentiment affecting product demand; regulatory factors including the impact of commerce and trade laws and regulations and the implementation or change in tariffs; and future restrictions on the Company’s cash resources, increased costs and other events that could potentially reduce demand for the Company’s products or result in order cancellations. The order in which these factors appear should not be construed to indicate their relative importance or priority. We caution that these factors may not be exhaustive; accordingly, any forward-looking statements contained herein should not be relied upon as a prediction of actual results. Investors should carefully consider these and other relevant factors, including those risk factors in Part I, Item 1A, (“Risk Factors”) in the Company’s most recent Form 10-K and Part II, Item 1A (“Risk Factors”) in the Company’s most recent Form 10-Q, should understand it is impossible to predict or identify all such factors or risks, should not consider the foregoing list, or the risks identified in the Company’s SEC filings, to be a complete discussion of all potential risks or uncertainties, and should not place undue reliance on forward-looking information. The Company assumes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking information, except as required by applicable law.

    Investor Contact:
    Tom Colton and Alec Wilson
    Gateway Group, Inc.
    949-574-3860
    BYRN@gateway-grp.com

    -Financial Tables to Follow-

    BYRNA TECHNOLOGIES INC.
    Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss)
    (Amounts in thousands except share and per share data)
    (Unaudited)
                       
        For the Three Months Ended   For the Six Months Ended  
        May 31   May 31  
          2025       2024       2025       2024    
    Net revenue   $ 28,505     $ 20,269     $ 54,695     $ 36,923    
    Cost of goods sold     10,941       7,709       21,207       14,724    
    Gross profit     17,564       12,560       33,488       22,199    
    Operating expenses     14,238       10,647       28,466       20,450    
    INCOME FROM OPERATIONS     3,326       1,913       5,022       1,749    
    OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)                  
    Foreign currency transaction loss     (135 )     (220 )     (215 )     (279 )  
    Interest income     116       323       303       604    
    Income from joint venture     –       62       –       20    
    Other income     18       2       17       3    
    INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES     3,325       2,080       5,127       2,097    
    Income tax expense     (898 )     (3 )     (1,038 )     (3 )  
    NET INCOME (LOSS)   $ 2,427     $ 2,077     $ 4,089     $ 2,094    
                       
    Foreign currency translation adjustment for the period     76       144       (54 )     29    
    Unrealized gain on marketable securities     17       –       77       –    
    COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)   $ 2,520     $ 2,221     $ 4,112     $ 2,123    
                       
    Basic net income (loss) per share   $ 0.11     $ 0.09     $ 0.18     $ 0.09    
    Diluted net income (loss) per share   $ 0.10     $ 0.09     $ 0.17     $ 0.09    
                       
    Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding – basic     22,668,546       22,728,500       22,628,270       22,383,769    
    Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding – diluted     23,951,297       23,731,076       24,021,948       22,942,530    
     
    BYRNA TECHNOLOGIES INC.
    Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
    (Amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)
               
        May 31   November 30,  
          2025       2024    
        Unaudited      
    ASSETS          
    CURRENT ASSETS          
    Cash and cash equivalents   $ 7,001     $ 16,829    
    Marketable Securities     5,984       8,904    
    Accounts receivable, net     6,536       2,630    
    Inventory, net     32,286       19,972    
    Prepaid expenses and other current assets     3,931       2,623    
    Total current assets     55,738       50,958    
    LONG TERM ASSETS          
    Deposits for equipment     1,981       2,665    
    Right-of-use-asset, net     2,262       2,452    
    Property and equipment, net     6,844       3,408    
    Intangible assets, net     3,215       3,337    
    Goodwill     2,258       2,258    
    Deferred tax asset     4,797       5,837    
    Other assets     355       1,007    
    TOTAL ASSETS   $ 77,450     $ 71,922    
               
    LIABILITIES          
    CURRENT LIABILITIES          
    Accounts payable and accrued liabilities   $ 14,377     $ 13,108    
    Operating lease liabilities, current     652       539    
    Deferred revenue, current     335       1,791    
    Total current liabilities     15,364       15,438    
    LONG TERM LIABILITIES          
    Deferred revenue, non-current     15       17    
    Operating lease liabilities, non-current     1,935       2,098    
    Total liabilities     17,314       17,553    
               
               
    STOCKHOLDERS‘ EQUITY          
    Preferred stock     –       –    
    Common stock     25       25    
    Additional paid-in capital     134,739       133,029    
    Treasury stock     (21,308 )     (21,253 )  
    Accumulated deficit     (52,694 )     (56,783 )  
    Accumulated other comprehensive loss     (626 )     (649 )  
               
    Total Stockholders’ Equity     60,136       54,369    
               
    TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY   $ 77,450     $ 71,922    
               

    Non-GAAP Financial Measures

    In addition to providing financial measurements based on generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (GAAP), we provide an additional financial metric that is not prepared in accordance with GAAP (non-GAAP) with presenting non-GAAP adjusted EBITDA. Management uses this non-GAAP financial measure, in addition to GAAP financial measures, to understand and compare operating results across accounting periods, for financial and operational decision making, for planning and forecasting purposes and to evaluate our financial performance. We believe that this non-GAAP financial measure helps us to identify underlying trends in our business that could otherwise be masked by the effect of certain expenses that we exclude in the calculations of the non-GAAP financial measure.

    Accordingly, we believe that this non-GAAP financial measure reflects our ongoing business in a manner that allows for meaningful comparisons and analysis of trends in the business and provides useful information to investors and others in understanding and evaluating our operating results, enhancing the overall understanding of our past performance and future prospects.

    This non-GAAP financial measure does not replace the presentation of our GAAP financial results and should only be used as a supplement to, not as a substitute for, our financial results presented in accordance with GAAP. There are limitations in the use of non-GAAP measures, because they do not include all the expenses that must be included under GAAP and because they involve the exercise of judgment concerning exclusions of items from the comparable non-GAAP financial measure. In addition, other companies may use other non-GAAP measures to evaluate their performance, or may calculate non-GAAP measures differently, all of which could reduce the usefulness of our non-GAAP financial measure as a tool for comparison.
             

    Adjusted EBITDA

    Adjusted EBITDA is defined as net (loss) income as reported in our condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive (loss) income excluding the impact of (I) depreciation and amortization; (ii) income tax provision (benefit); (iii) interest income (expense); (iv) stock-based compensation expense, (v) impairment loss, and (vi) one time, non-recurring other expenses or income. Our Adjusted EBITDA measure eliminates potential differences in performance caused by variations in capital structures (affecting finance costs), tax positions, the cost and age of tangible assets (affecting relative depreciation expense) and the extent to which intangible assets are identifiable (affecting relative amortization expense). We also exclude certain one-time and non-cash costs. Reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to net (loss) income, the most directly comparable GAAP measure, is as follows (in thousands):

          For the Three Months Ended   For the Six Months Ended  
          May 31   May 31  
            2025       2024       2025       2024    
    Net Income (Loss)   $ 2,427     $ 2,077     $ 4,089     $ 2,094    
                         
    Adjustments:                  
      Interest income     (116 )     (323 )     (303 )     (604 )  
      Income tax expense     898       3       1,038       3    
      Depreciation and amortization     252       165       437       335    
    Non-GAAP EBITDA   $ 3,461     $ 1,922     $ 5,261     $ 1,828    
                         
    Stock-based compensation expense     723       858       1,562       1,796    
    Severance/Separation/Officer recruiting     116           246       175    
    Non-GAAP adjusted EBITDA   $ 4,300     $ 2,780     $ 7,069     $ 3,799    
                         

    1 See non-GAAP financial measures at the end of this press release for a reconciliation and a discussion of non-GAAP financial measures.

    The MIL Network –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Minutes – Wednesday, 9 July 2025 – Strasbourg – Final edition

    Source: European Parliament

    PV-10-2025-07-09

    EN

    EN

    iPlPv_Sit

    Minutes
    Wednesday, 9 July 2025 – Strasbourg

    IN THE CHAIR: Roberta METSOLA
    President

    1. Opening of the sitting

    The sitting opened at 09:02.



    2. Negotiations ahead of Parliament’s first reading (Rule 72) (action taken)

    The decisions of the JURI, TRAN, BUDG, ECON, REGI and EMPL committees to enter into interinstitutional negotiations had been announced on 7 July 2025 (minutes of 7.7.2025, item 5).

    As no request for a vote pursuant to Rule 72(2) had been made, the committees responsible had been able to enter into negotiations upon expiry of the deadline.



    3. Conclusions of the European Council meeting of 26 June 2025 (debate)

    European Council and Commission statements: Conclusions of the European Council meeting of 26 June 2025 (2025/2981(RSP))

    The President provided some clarifications on the way in which the debate would be conducted, as a new format was being tested.

    António Costa (President of the European Council) and Ursula von der Leyen (President of the Commission) made the statements.

    The following spoke: Dolors Montserrat, on behalf of the PPE Group, Kathleen Van Brempt, on behalf of the S&D Group, Kinga Gál, on behalf of the PfE Group, Nicolas Bay, on behalf of the ECR Group, Valérie Hayer, on behalf of the Renew Group, Bas Eickhout, on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group, Manon Aubry, on behalf of The Left Group, René Aust, on behalf of the ESN Group, Paulo Cunha, Nicola Zingaretti, Paolo Borchia, Carlo Fidanza, Estrella Galán, Milan Uhrík, Kostas Papadakis, Luděk Niedermayer, Dan Nica, Marieke Ehlers, Reinhold Lopatka and Javier Moreno Sánchez.

    IN THE CHAIR: Christel SCHALDEMOSE
    Vice-President

    The following spoke: Anna Bryłka, Gaetano Pedulla’, Seán Kelly, Marta Temido, who also answered a blue-card question from João Oliveira, and Csaba Dömötör.

    The following spoke under the catch-the-eye procedure: Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Sebastian Tynkkynen, Maria Grapini, João Oliveira, Alexander Jungbluth, Vytenis Povilas Andriukaitis, Malika Sorel and Milan Mazurek.

    The following spoke: Maroš Šefčovič (Member of the Commission) and António Costa.

    The debate closed.



    4. The EU’s post-2027 long-term budget: Parliament’s expectations ahead of the Commission’s proposal (debate)

    Council and Commission statements: The EU’s post-2027 long-term budget: Parliament’s expectations ahead of the Commission’s proposal (2025/2803(RSP))

    Marie Bjerre (President-in-Office of the Council) and Piotr Serafin (Member of the Commission) made the statements.

    The following spoke: Siegfried Mureşan, on behalf of the PPE Group, Mohammed Chahim, on behalf of the S&D Group, Tamás Deutsch, on behalf of the PfE Group, Patryk Jaki, on behalf of the ECR Group, Fabienne Keller, on behalf of the Renew Group, Terry Reintke, on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group, João Oliveira, on behalf of The Left Group, Alexander Jungbluth, on behalf of the ESN Group, Karlo Ressler, Carla Tavares, Angéline Furet, Johan Van Overtveldt, Lucia Yar, Rasmus Nordqvist, Younous Omarjee, Milan Mazurek, Thomas Geisel, Herbert Dorfmann, Victor Negrescu, Ruggero Razza, Ľubica Karvašová, Andrey Novakov, Nicola Zingaretti, Jaak Madison, Rasmus Andresen, Christian Ehler, Andreas Schieder, Isabel Benjumea Benjumea, Jean-Marc Germain, Tomasz Buczek, Bogdan Rzońca, Anouk Van Brug, Danuše Nerudová, Sandra Gómez López, Moritz Körner and Janusz Lewandowski.

    The following spoke under the catch-the-eye procedure: Georgios Aftias, Thomas Bajada, Arkadiusz Mularczyk, Petras Gražulis, Branislav Ondruš, Dariusz Joński, Hélder Sousa Silva and Nina Carberry.

    The following spoke: Piotr Serafin and Marie Bjerre.

    The debate closed.

    (The sitting was suspended at 11:56.)



    IN THE CHAIR: Roberta METSOLA
    President

    5. Resumption of the sitting

    The sitting resumed at 12:00.

    ⁂

    The following spoke: Terry Reintke.



    6. Requests for the waiver of immunity

    The competent Austrian authorities had sent the President a request for Harald Vilimsky’s immunity to be waived in connection with legal proceedings in Austria.

    Pursuant to Rule 9(1), the request had been referred to the committee responsible, in this case the JURI Committee.



    7. Voting time

    For detailed results of the votes, see also ‘Results of votes’ and ‘Results of roll-call votes’.



    7.1. European Climate Law ***I (vote)

    European Climate Law (COM(2025)0524 – C10-0137/2025 – 2025/0524(COD)) – ENVI Committee

    REQUESTS FOR AN URGENT DECISION from the Verts/ALE, Renew and S&D groups (Rule 170(5))

    Rejected

    The following had spoken:

    Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy, Lena Schilling and Tiemo Wölken (movers of the requests), and Jeroen Lenaers (against the requests), before the vote.

    (‘Results of votes’, item 1)



    7.2. Objection pursuant to Rule 114(3): amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1675 to add certain countries to the list of high-risk third countries, and to remove other countries from that list (vote)

    Motions for resolutions B10-0311/2025, B10-0315/2025, B10-0316/2025 and B10-0318/2025 pursuant to Rule 114(3) (minutes of 9.7.2025, item I)

    (Majority of Parliament’s component Members required)

    MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION B10-0311/2025

    Rejected

    MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION B10-0315/2025

    Rejected

    MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION B10-0316/2025

    Rejected

    MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION B10-0318/2025

    Rejected

    The following had spoken:

    Maria Luís Albuquerque (Member of the Commission), before the vote, to make a statement.

    (‘Results of votes’, item 2)



    7.3. Objection pursuant to Rule 115(2) and (3): Deforestation Regulation – list of countries presenting a low or high risk (vote)

    Motion for a resolution tabled by the ENVI Committee pursuant to Rule 115(2) and (3), on the draft Commission regulation on Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1093 of 22 May 2025 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) 2023/1115 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards a list of countries that present a low or high risk of producing relevant commodities for which the relevant products do not comply with Article 3, point (a) (2025/2739(RPS)) (B10-0321/2025) – Member responsible: Alexander Bernhuber

    (Majority of the votes cast)

    MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION

    Adopted (P10_TA(2025)0149)

    (‘Results of votes’, item 3)



    7.4. Amending Regulation (EU) No 1026/2012 on certain measures for the purpose of the conservation of fish stocks in relation to countries allowing non-sustainable fishing ***I (vote)

    Report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) No 1026/2012 on certain measures for the purpose of the conservation of fish stocks in relation to countries allowing non-sustainable fishing [COM(2024)0407 – C10-0098/2024 – 2024/0224(COD)] – Committee on Fisheries. Rapporteur: Thomas Bajada (A10-0070/2025)

    (Majority of the votes cast)

    PROVISIONAL AGREEMENT

    Adopted (P10_TA(2025)0150)

    Parliament’s first reading thus closed.

    The following had spoken:

    Thomas Bajada, before the vote, to make a statement on the basis of Rule 165(4).

    (‘Results of votes’, item 4)



    7.5. Draft amending budget No 1/2025: entering the surplus of the financial year 2024 (vote)

    Report on the Council position on Draft amending budget No 1/2025 of the European Union for the financial year 2025 entering the surplus of the financial year 2024 [09619/2025 – C10-0125/2025 – 2025/0091(BUD)] – Committee on Budgets. Rapporteur: Victor Negrescu (A10-0116/2025)

    (Majority of the votes cast)

    MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION

    Adopted (P10_TA(2025)0151)

    The following had spoken:

    Victor Negrescu, before the vote, to make a statement on the basis of Rule 165(4).

    (‘Results of votes’, item 5)



    7.6. Mobilisation of the European Union Solidarity Fund: assistance to Austria, Poland, Czechia, Slovakia and Moldova relating to floods that occurred in September 2024 and Bosnia and Herzegovina relating to floods that occurred in October 2024 (vote)

    Report on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on the mobilisation of the European Union Solidarity Fund to provide assistance to Austria, Poland, Czechia, Slovakia and Moldova relating to floods occurred in September 2024 and Bosnia and Herzegovina relating to floods occurred in October 2024 [COM(2025)0250 – C10-0102/2025 – 2025/0138(BUD)] – Committee on Budgets. Rapporteur: Andrzej Halicki (A10-0114/2025)

    (Majority of the votes cast)

    MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION

    Adopted (P10_TA(2025)0152)

    (‘Results of votes’, item 6)



    7.7. Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: Application EGF/2025/000 TA 2025 – Technical assistance at the initiative of the Commission (vote)

    Report on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund for Displaced Workers – EGF/2025/000 TA 2025 – Technical assistance at the initiative of the Commission [COM(2025)0680 – C10-0103/2025 – 2025/0135(BUD)] – Committee on Budgets. Rapporteur: Jean-Marc Germain (A10-0115/2025)

    (Majority of the votes cast)

    MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION

    Adopted (P10_TA(2025)0153)

    The following had spoken:

    Jean-Marc Germain, before the vote, to make a statement on the basis of Rule 165(4).

    (‘Results of votes’, item 7)



    7.8. Product safety and regulatory compliance in e-commerce and non-EU imports (vote)

    Report on product safety and regulatory compliance in e-commerce and non-EU imports [2025/2037(INI)] – Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection. Rapporteur: Salvatore De Meo (A10-0133/2025)

    (Majority of the votes cast)

    MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION

    Adopted (P10_TA(2025)0154)

    (‘Results of votes’, item 8)



    7.9. 2023 and 2024 reports on Albania (vote)

    Report on the 2023 and 2024 Commission reports on Albania [2025/2017(INI)] – Committee on Foreign Affairs. Rapporteur: Andreas Schieder (A10-0106/2025)

    (Majority of the votes cast)

    MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION

    Adopted (P10_TA(2025)0155)

    (‘Results of votes’, item 9)



    7.10. 2023 and 2024 reports on Bosnia and Herzegovina (vote)

    Report on the 2023 and 2024 Commission reports on Bosnia and Herzegovina [2025/2018(INI)] – Committee on Foreign Affairs. Rapporteur: Ondřej Kolář (A10-0108/2025)

    (Majority of the votes cast)

    MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION

    Adopted (P10_TA(2025)0156)

    (‘Results of votes’, item 10)



    7.11. 2023 and 2024 reports on North Macedonia (vote)

    Report on the 2023 and 2024 Commission reports on North Macedonia [2025/2021(INI)] – Committee on Foreign Affairs. Rapporteur: Thomas Waitz (A10-0118/2025)

    (Majority of the votes cast)

    MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION

    Adopted (P10_TA(2025)0157)

    (‘Results of votes’, item 11)



    7.12. 2023 and 2024 reports on Georgia (vote)

    Report on the 2023 and 2024 Commission reports on Georgia [2025/2024(INI)] – Committee on Foreign Affairs. Rapporteur: Rasa Juknevičienė (A10-0110/2025)

    (Majority of the votes cast)

    MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION

    Adopted (P10_TA(2025)0158)

    The following had spoken:

    – Rasa Juknevičienė, to move an oral amendment to Amendment 9. Parliament had agreed to put the oral amendment to the vote.

    – Urmas Paet, to move an oral amendment to paragraph 16. Parliament had agreed to put the oral amendment to the vote.

    (‘Results of votes’, item 12)



    7.13. Implementation and delivery of the Sustainable Development Goals in view of the 2025 High-Level Political Forum (vote)

    Report on implementation and delivery of the Sustainable Development Goals in view of the 2025 High-Level Political Forum [2025/2014(INI)] – Committee on Development – Committee on the Environment, Climate and Food Safety. Rapporteurs: Robert Biedroń and Nikolas Farantouris (A10-0125/2025)

    (Majority of the votes cast)

    MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION

    Adopted (P10_TA(2025)0159)

    The following had spoken:

    Robert Biedroń and Nikolas Farantouris, before the vote, to make a statement on the basis of Rule 165(4).

    (‘Results of votes’, item 13)



    7.14. The human cost of Russia’s war against Ukraine and the urgent need to end Russian aggression: the situation of illegally detained civilians and prisoners of war, and the continued bombing of civilians (vote)

    Motions for resolutions RC-B10-0304/2025, B10-0303/2025, B10-0304/2025, B10-0305/2025, B10-0306/2025, B10-0307/2025 and B10-0308/2025 (2025/2710(RSP))

    The debate had taken place on 16 June 2025 (minutes of 16.6.2025, item 21).

    (Majority of the votes cast)

    JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION RC-B10-0304/2025

    Adopted (P10_TA(2025)0160)

    (Motion for a resolution B10-0303/2025 fell.)

    (‘Results of votes’, item 14)

    (The sitting was suspended at 13:01.)



    IN THE CHAIR: Sabine VERHEYEN
    Vice-President

    8. Resumption of the sitting

    The sitting resumed at 13:05.



    9. Approval of the minutes of the previous sitting

    The minutes of the previous sitting were approved.



    10. Lessons from Budapest Pride: the urgent need for an EU wide anti-discrimination law and defending fundamental rights against right-wing attacks (topical debate)

    The following spoke: Ana Catarina Mendes to open the debate proposed by the S&D Group.

    The following spoke: Marie Bjerre (President-in-Office of the Council) and Michael McGrath (Member of the Commission).

    The following spoke: Sven Simon, on behalf of the PPE Group, Klára Dobrev, on behalf of the S&D Group, Jorge Buxadé Villalba, on behalf of the PfE Group, Alessandro Ciriani, on behalf of the ECR Group, Fabienne Keller, on behalf of the Renew Group, Alice Kuhnke, on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group, Manon Aubry, on behalf of The Left Group (the President reminded the speaker of the rules on conduct), Zsuzsanna Borvendég, on behalf of the ESN Group, Maria Walsh, Marc Angel, Tom Vandendriessche, Paolo Inselvini, Sophie Wilmès, Tineke Strik, Irene Montero, Irmhild Boßdorf (the President reminded the House of the rules on conduct), Michał Wawrykiewicz, Raphaël Glucksmann, András László, Georgiana Teodorescu, Veronika Cifrová Ostrihoňová, Nicolae Ștefănuță, Özlem Demirel, Ewa Zajączkowska-Hernik, Sirpa Pietikäinen, Evin Incir, Petra Steger, Maciej Wąsik, Moritz Körner, Kim Van Sparrentak, Carolina Morace, Markus Buchheit, Adrián Vázquez Lázara, Birgit Sippel, Jaroslava Pokorná Jermanová, Marlena Maląg, Hilde Vautmans (the President reminded the speaker of the rules on conduct), Daniel Freund, Li Andersson, Milan Uhrík, Rosa Estaràs Ferragut, Krzysztof Śmiszek, Julien Sanchez, Claudiu-Richard Târziu, Cynthia Ní Mhurchú, Mélissa Camara, Mary Khan, Alessandro Zan, Juan Carlos Girauta Vidal, Cristian Terheş, Lukas Sieper on the previous speaker’s remarks (the President took note of this and again reminded the House of the rules on conduct), and Juan Fernando López Aguilar.

    The following spoke: Michael McGrath.

    IN THE CHAIR: Younous OMARJEE
    Vice-President

    The following spoke: Marie Bjerre.

    The debate closed.



    11. EU-US trade negotiations (debate)

    Council and Commission statements: EU-US trade negotiations (2025/2804(RSP))

    Marie Bjerre (President-in-Office of the Council) and Maroš Šefčovič (Member of the Commission) made the statements.

    The following spoke: Jörgen Warborn, on behalf of the PPE Group, Kathleen Van Brempt, on behalf of the S&D Group, Enikő Győri, on behalf of the PfE Group, Rihards Kols, on behalf of the ECR Group, Karin Karlsbro, on behalf of the Renew Group, Anna Cavazzini, on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group, Martin Schirdewan, on behalf of The Left Group, Michał Szczerba, Bernd Lange, Séverine Werbrouck, Svenja Hahn, Virginijus Sinkevičius, Lynn Boylan, Luis-Vicențiu Lazarus, Željana Zovko, Brando Benifei, Jorge Martín Frías, Dick Erixon, Dan Barna, Sergey Lagodinsky, Marina Mesure, Kateřina Konečná, Daniel Caspary, who also answered a blue-card question from Lukas Sieper, Alex Agius Saliba, Gilles Pennelle, Adrian-George Axinia, João Cotrim De Figueiredo, who also answered a blue-card question from Bruno Gonçalves, Catarina Vieira, Pasquale Tridico, Branislav Ondruš, Juan Ignacio Zoido Álvarez, Javier Moreno Sánchez, Silvia Sardone, Jacek Ozdoba, Sophie Wilmès, Lukas Sieper, Céline Imart, Evin Incir, Pierre Pimpie, Anna Zalewska, Massimiliano Salini, Jean-Marc Germain, Francisco José Millán Mon, Cristina Maestre, Miriam Lexmann, Mika Aaltola, Jessika Van Leeuwen, Nina Carberry, Luděk Niedermayer, Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral, Wouter Beke, Ingeborg Ter Laak, Maria Walsh and Michalis Hadjipantela.

    The following spoke under the catch-the-eye procedure: Regina Doherty, Maria Grapini, Sebastian Tynkkynen and Oihane Agirregoitia Martínez.

    The following spoke: Maroš Šefčovič and Marie Bjerre.

    The debate closed.



    12. EU Preparedness Union in light of the upcoming wildfire and droughts season (debate)

    Council and Commission statements: EU Preparedness Union in light of the upcoming wildfire and droughts season (2025/2771(RSP))

    Marie Bjerre (President-in-Office of the Council) made the statement.

    IN THE CHAIR: Antonella SBERNA
    Vice-President

    Hadja Lahbib (Member of the Commission) made the statement.

    The following spoke: Lena Düpont, on behalf of the PPE Group, Antonio Decaro, on behalf of the S&D Group, Sergio Berlato, on behalf of the ECR Group, Grégory Allione, on behalf of the Renew Group, Benedetta Scuderi, on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group, Valentina Palmisano, on behalf of The Left Group, Raúl de la Hoz Quintano, Marta Temido, Csaba Dömötör, who also answered a blue-card question from Stine Bosse, Diego Solier, Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy, Vicent Marzà Ibáñez, Elena Kountoura, Nikolaos Anadiotis, Matej Tonin, Leire Pajín, Julien Leonardelli, who also answered blue-card questions from Grégory Allione and Thomas Pellerin-Carlin, Ruggero Razza, who also answered a blue-card question from Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy, Mārtiņš Staķis, Lefteris Nikolaou-Alavanos, Ana Miguel Pedro, who also declined to take a blue-card question from Ana Miranda Paz, Thomas Pellerin-Carlin, Ana Vasconcelos, Ana Miranda Paz, Péter Magyar, Victor Negrescu, Marjan Šarec, Dimitris Tsiodras, Sofie Eriksson, Giusi Princi, Sakis Arnaoutoglou, Daniel Buda, Hannes Heide, Sunčana Glavak, Rosa Serrano Sierra, Sérgio Humberto and Michalis Hadjipantela.

    The following spoke under the catch-the-eye procedure: Francisco José Millán Mon, Vytenis Povilas Andriukaitis, Viktória Ferenc, Sebastian Tynkkynen, Ciaran Mullooly, Diana Riba i Giner, Maria Zacharia and Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă.

    The following spoke: Hadja Lahbib and Marie Bjerre.

    IN THE CHAIR: Martin HOJSÍK
    Vice-President

    The debate closed.



    13. Composition of committees and delegations

    The ECR Group had notified the President of the following decision changing the composition of the committees and delegations:

    – Delegation to the Africa-EU Parliamentary Assembly: Galato Alexandraki was no longer a member

    The decision took effect as of that day.



    14. Presentation of stockpiling strategies – strengthening response capacities for a changing risk and threat landscape (debate)

    Commission statement: Presentation of stockpiling strategies – strengthening response capacities for a changing risk and threat landscape (2025/2790(RSP))

    Hadja Lahbib (Member of the Commission) made the statement.

    The following spoke: Tomislav Sokol, on behalf of the PPE Group, Christophe Clergeau, on behalf of the S&D Group, Valérie Deloge, on behalf of the PfE Group, Kosma Złotowski, on behalf of the ECR Group, Grégory Allione, on behalf of the Renew Group, Pär Holmgren, on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group, Catarina Martins, on behalf of The Left Group, Christine Anderson, on behalf of the ESN Group, Mirosława Nykiel, Nicolás González Casares, Stine Bosse, Ruth Firmenich, Paulius Saudargas, Marta Temido, Liesbet Sommen and Michalis Hadjipantela.

    The following spoke under the catch-the-eye procedure: Vytenis Povilas Andriukaitis and Sebastian Tynkkynen.

    The following spoke: Hadja Lahbib.

    The debate closed.



    15. Alleged misuse of EU funds by Members of the far-right and measures to ensure institutional integrity (debate)

    Statements by Parliament: Alleged misuse of EU funds by Members of the far-right and measures to ensure institutional integrity (2025/2808(RSP))

    The following spoke: Niclas Herbst, on behalf of the PPE Group, Chloé Ridel, on behalf of the S&D Group, Moritz Körner, on behalf of the Renew Group, Mélissa Camara, on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group, Manon Aubry, on behalf of The Left Group, Arno Bausemer, on behalf of the ESN Group, Tomáš Zdechovský, who also answered a blue-card question from Raquel García Hermida-Van Der Walle, Giuseppe Lupo, Raquel García Hermida-Van Der Walle, who also answered blue-card questions from Tomáš Zdechovský and Sebastian Tynkkynen, Daniel Freund, who also answered blue-card questions from Arno Bausemer and Moritz Körner (the President reminded the speaker to keep to the subject of the debate), Jonas Sjöstedt, Reinhold Lopatka, Andreas Schieder and Helmut Brandstätter.

    The following spoke under the catch-the-eye procedure: Juan Fernando López Aguilar.

    The debate closed.



    16. Democratic Republic of the Congo-Rwanda peace deal agreement (debate)

    Council and Commission statements: Democratic Republic of the Congo-Rwanda peace deal agreement (2025/2792(RSP))

    Jozef Síkela (Member of the Commission) made the statement on behalf of the Commission.

    The following spoke: Ingeborg Ter Laak, on behalf of the PPE Group, Marit Maij, on behalf of the S&D Group, Philippe Olivier, on behalf of the PfE Group, Nicolas Bay, on behalf of the ECR Group, Hilde Vautmans, on behalf of the Renew Group, Mounir Satouri, on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group, Marc Botenga, on behalf of The Left Group, Wouter Beke and Francisco Assis.

    IN THE CHAIR: Victor NEGRESCU
    Vice-President

    The following spoke: France Jamet, Jan-Christoph Oetjen, Pernando Barrena Arza, Jan Farský and Hannes Heide.

    The following spoke under the catch-the-eye procedure: Juan Fernando López Aguilar.

    The following spoke: Jozef Síkela.

    The debate closed.



    17. Outcome of the Conference on the Financing for Development in Seville (debate)

    Council and Commission statements: Outcome of the Conference on the Financing for Development in Seville (2025/2793(RSP))

    Marie Bjerre (President-in-Office of the Council) and Jozef Síkela (Member of the Commission) made the statements.

    The following spoke: Lukas Mandl, on behalf of the PPE Group, Marit Maij, on behalf of the S&D Group, Jorge Buxadé Villalba, on behalf of the PfE Group, Mario Mantovani, on behalf of the ECR Group, Barry Andrews, on behalf of the Renew Group, Isabella Lövin, on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group, Marc Jongen, on behalf of the ESN Group, Udo Bullmann, Tiago Moreira de Sá, Beatrice Timgren, Charles Goerens, Leire Pajín, Juan Carlos Girauta Vidal, Robert Biedroń, Murielle Laurent, Francisco Assis and Joanna Scheuring-Wielgus.

    The following spoke: Jozef Síkela and Marie Bjerre.

    The debate closed.



    18. 51 years after the Turkish invasion of the Republic of Cyprus: condemning the continued Turkish occupation and supporting the resumption of negotiations for a comprehensive solution in line with international law, the UNSC resolutions, EU principles and acquis (debate)

    Commission statement: 51 years after the Turkish invasion of the Republic of Cyprus: condemning the continued Turkish occupation and supporting the resumption of negotiations for a comprehensive solution in line with international law, the UNSC resolutions, EU principles and acquis (2025/2794(RSP))

    Jozef Síkela (Member of the Commission) made the statement.

    The following spoke: Loucas Fourlas, on behalf of the PPE Group, Costas Mavrides, on behalf of the S&D Group, Afroditi Latinopoulou, on behalf of the PfE Group, Geadis Geadi, on behalf of the ECR Group, Kai Tegethoff, on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group, Giorgos Georgiou, on behalf of The Left Group, and Marc Jongen, on behalf of the ESN Group.

    The following spoke: Jozef Síkela.

    The debate closed.



    19. Debate on cases of breaches of human rights, democracy and the rule of law (debate)

    (For the titles and authors of the motions for resolutions, see minutes of 9.7.2025, item I.)



    19.1. Case of Ryan Cornelius in Dubai

    Motions for resolutions B10-0328/2025, B10-0333/2025, B10-0336/2025, B10-0340/2025 and B10-0341/2025 (2025/2796(RSP))

    Seán Kelly and Aodhán Ó Ríordáin introduced their groups’ motions for resolutions.

    IN THE CHAIR: Javi LÓPEZ
    Vice-President

    Petras Auštrevičius and Catarina Vieira introduced their groups’ motions for resolutions.

    The following spoke: Reinhold Lopatka, on behalf of the PPE Group, and Barry Andrews, on behalf of the Renew Group.

    The following spoke: Jozef Síkela (Member of the Commission).

    The debate closed.

    Vote: 10 July 2025.



    19.2. Arbitrary arrest and torture of Belgian-Portuguese researcher Joseph Figueira Martin in the Central African Republic

    Motions for resolutions B10-0323/2025, B10-0327/2025, B10-0334/2025, B10-0339/2025 and B10-0342/2025 (2025/2797(RSP))

    Wouter Beke, Francisco Assis, Hilde Vautmans, Saskia Bricmont and Catarina Martins introduced their groups’ motions for resolutions.

    The following spoke: Kathleen Van Brempt, on behalf of the S&D Group, and João Cotrim De Figueiredo, on behalf of the Renew Group.

    The following spoke under the catch-the-eye procedure: Seán Kelly.

    The following spoke: Jozef Síkela (Member of the Commission).

    The debate closed.

    Vote: 10 July 2025.



    19.3. Urgent need to protect religious minorities in Syria following the recent terrorist attack on Mar Elias Church in Damascus

    Motions for resolutions B10-0325/2025, B10-0335/2025, B10-0338/2025, B10-0343/2025, B10-0344/2025, B10-0345/2025, B10-0346/2025 and B10-0347/2025 (2025/2798(RSP))

    Ingeborg Ter Laak, Marco Tarquinio, Nathalie Loiseau, Hannah Neumann, Nikolas Farantouris, Silvia Sardone, Bert-Jan Ruissen and Tomasz Froelich introduced their groups’ motions for resolutions.

    The following spoke: Sander Smit, on behalf of the PPE Group, Yannis Maniatis, on behalf of the S&D Group, Matthieu Valet, on behalf of the PfE Group, Małgorzata Gosiewska, on behalf of the ECR Group, Michalis Hadjipantela, Evin Incir, Margarita de la Pisa Carrión, Laurence Trochu, Christophe Gomart, Paolo Inselvini, Joachim Stanisław Brudziński and Geadis Geadi.

    The following spoke under the catch-the-eye procedure: Fredis Beleris and Costas Mavrides.

    The following spoke: Jozef Síkela (Member of the Commission).

    The debate closed.

    Vote: 10 July 2025.



    20. Explanations of votes in writing (Rule 201)

    Explanations of votes given in writing would appear on the Members’ pages on Parliament’s website.



    21. Agenda of the next sitting

    The next sitting would be held the following day, 10 July 2025, starting at 09:00. The agenda was available on Parliament’s website.



    22. Approval of the minutes of the sitting

    In accordance with Rule 208(3), the minutes of the sitting would be put to the House for approval at the beginning of the afternoon of the next sitting.



    23. Closure of the sitting

    The sitting closed at 22:02.



    LIST OF DOCUMENTS SERVING AS A BASIS FOR THE DEBATES AND DECISIONS OF PARLIAMENT



    I. Motions for resolutions tabled

    Case of Ryan Cornelius in Dubai

    The following Members or political groups had requested that a debate be held, in accordance with Rule 150, on the following motions for resolutions:

    on the case of Ryan Cornelius in Dubai (2025/2796(RSP)) (B10-0328/2025)
    Rasmus Andresen, Villy Søvndal, Maria Ohisalo, Nicolae Ștefănuță, Mélissa Camara, Mounir Satouri, Catarina Vieira, Ville Niinistö
    on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

    on the case of Ryan Cornelius in Dubai (2025/2796(RSP)) (B10-0333/2025)
    Petras Auštrevičius, Malik Azmani, Dan Barna, Benoit Cassart, Olivier Chastel, Engin Eroglu, Karin Karlsbro, Ilhan Kyuchyuk, Hilde Vautmans, Lucia Yar
    on behalf of the Renew Group

    on the case of Ryan Cornelius in Dubai (2025/2796(RSP)) (B10-0336/2025)
    Yannis Maniatis, Francisco Assis, Aodhán Ó Ríordáin
    on behalf of The Left Group

    on the case of Ryan Cornelius in Dubai (2025/2796(RSP)) (B10-0340/2025)
    Sebastião Bugalho, Seán Kelly, Tomáš Zdechovský, Ingeborg Ter Laak, Isabel Wiseler-Lima, Tomas Tobé, Wouter Beke, Davor Ivo Stier, Łukasz Kohut, Mirosława Nykiel, Michał Wawrykiewicz, Inese Vaidere
    on behalf of the PPE Group

    on the case of Ryan Cornelius in Dubai (2025/2796(RSP)) (B10-0341/2025)
    Adam Bielan, Joachim Stanisław Brudziński, Marlena Maląg, Sebastian Tynkkynen, Bogdan Rzońca, Arkadiusz Mularczyk, Ivaylo Valchev, Anna Zalewska, Waldemar Tomaszewski, Ondřej Krutílek, Veronika Vrecionová
    on behalf of the ECR Group

    Arbitrary arrest and torture of Belgian-Portuguese researcher Joseph Figueira Martin in the Central African Republic

    The following Members or political groups had requested that a debate be held, in accordance with Rule 150, on the following motions for resolutions:

    on the arbitrary arrest and torture of Belgian-Portuguese researcher Joseph Figueira Martin in the Central African Republic (2025/2797(RSP)) (B10-0323/2025)
    Catarina Martins
    on behalf of The Left Group

    on the arbitrary arrest and torture of Belgian-Portuguese researcher Joseph Figueira Martin in the Central African Republic (2025/2797(RSP)) (B10-0327/2025)
    Yannis Maniatis, Kathleen Van Brempt, Francisco Assis
    on behalf of the S&D Group
    Saskia Bricmont, Mélissa Camara, Catarina Vieira, Maria Ohisalo, Mounir Satouri, Nicolae Ștefănuță, Ville Niinistö
    on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

    on the arbitrary arrest and torture of Belgian-Portuguese researcher Joseph Figueira Martin in the Central African Republic (2025/2797(RSP)) (B10-0334/2025)
    Hilde Vautmans, Oihane Agirregoitia Martínez, Petras Auštrevičius, Malik Azmani, Dan Barna, Benoit Cassart, Olivier Chastel, Engin Eroglu, Svenja Hahn, Karin Karlsbro, Ilhan Kyuchyuk, Jan-Christoph Oetjen, Marie-Agnes Strack-Zimmermann, Lucia Yar
    on behalf of the Renew Group

    on the arbitrary arrest and torture of Belgian-Portuguese researcher Joseph Figueira Martin in the Central African Republic (2025/2797(RSP)) (B10-0339/2025)
    Sebastião Bugalho, Wouter Beke, Ingeborg Ter Laak, Željana Zovko, Isabel Wiseler-Lima, Andrey Kovatchev, Tomas Tobé, Tomáš Zdechovský, Davor Ivo Stier, Łukasz Kohut, Liudas Mažylis, Vangelis Meimarakis, Loránt Vincze, Seán Kelly, Mirosława Nykiel, Michał Wawrykiewicz, Inese Vaidere
    on behalf of the PPE Group

    on the arbitrary arrest and torture of Belgian-Portuguese researcher Joseph Figueira Martin in the Central African Republic (2025/2797(RSP)) (B10-0342/2025)
    Adam Bielan, Aurelijus Veryga, Carlo Fidanza, Marlena Maląg, Joachim Stanisław Brudziński, Sebastian Tynkkynen, Alexandr Vondra, Bogdan Rzońca, Arkadiusz Mularczyk, Ondřej Krutílek, Veronika Vrecionová, Ivaylo Valchev, Alberico Gambino, Anna Zalewska, Małgorzata Gosiewska, Assita Kanko, Michał Dworczyk, Waldemar Tomaszewski
    on behalf of the ECR Group

    Urgent need to protect religious minorities in Syria following the recent terrorist attack on Mar Elias Church in Damascus

    The following Members or political groups had requested that a debate be held, in accordance with Rule 150, on the following motions for resolutions:

    on the urgent need to protect religious minorities in Syria following the recent terrorist attack on Mar Elias Church in Damascus (2025/2798(RSP)) (B10-0325/2025)
    Nikolas Farantouris, Özlem Demirel
    on behalf of The Left Group

    on the urgent need to protect religious minorities in Syria following the recent terrorist attack on Mar Elias Church in Damascus (2025/2798(RSP)) (B10-0335/2025)
    Hannah Neumann, Maria Ohisalo, Katrin Langensiepen, Nicolae Ștefănuță, Mounir Satouri, Catarina Vieira
    on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

    on the urgent need to protect religious minorities in Syria following the recent terrorist attack on Mar Elias Church in Damascus (2025/2798(RSP)) (B10-0338/2025)
    Tomasz Froelich, Petr Bystron, Alexander Sell, Marc Jongen
    on behalf of the ESN Group

    on the urgent need to protect religious minorities in Syria following the recent terrorist attack on Mar Elias Church in Damascus (2025/2798(RSP)) (B10-0343/2025)
    Silvia Sardone, Susanna Ceccardi, Roberto Vannacci, Matthieu Valet, Pierre-Romain Thionnet, António Tânger Corrêa, Afroditi Latinopoulou, Hermann Tertsch
    on behalf of the PfE Group

    on the urgent need to protect religious minorities in Syria following the recent terrorist attack on Mar Elias Church in Damascus (2025/2798(RSP)) (B10-0344/2025)
    Nathalie Loiseau, Oihane Agirregoitia Martínez, Petras Auštrevičius, Malik Azmani, Dan Barna, Engin Eroglu, Svenja Hahn, Karin Karlsbro, Jan-Christoph Oetjen, Urmas Paet, Marie-Agnes Strack-Zimmermann, Hilde Vautmans, Lucia Yar
    on behalf of the Renew Group

    on the urgent need to protect religious minorities in Syria following the recent terrorist attack on Mar Elias Church in Damascus (2025/2798(RSP)) (B10-0345/2025)
    Adam Bielan, Bert-Jan Ruissen, Aurelijus Veryga, Carlo Fidanza, Marlena Maląg, Joachim Stanisław Brudziński, Sebastian Tynkkynen, Bogdan Rzońca, Arkadiusz Mularczyk, Alexandr Vondra, Reinis Pozņaks, Ondřej Krutílek, Veronika Vrecionová, Emmanouil Fragkos, Ivaylo Valchev, Małgorzata Gosiewska, Guillaume Peltier, Alberico Gambino, Marion Maréchal, Nicolas Bay, Laurence Trochu, Anna Zalewska, Assita Kanko, Waldemar Tomaszewski
    on behalf of the ECR Group

    on the urgent need to protect religious minorities in Syria following the recent terrorist attack on Mar Elias Church in Damascus (2025/2798(RSP)) (B10-0346/2025)
    Sebastião Bugalho, Ingeborg Ter Laak, David McAllister, François-Xavier Bellamy, Andrzej Halicki, Wouter Beke, Željana Zovko, Isabel Wiseler-Lima, Andrey Kovatchev, Tomas Tobé, Tomáš Zdechovský, Davor Ivo Stier, Sander Smit, Elissavet Vozemberg-Vrionidi, Eleonora Meleti, Vangelis Meimarakis, Georgios Aftias, Dimitris Tsiodras, Emmanouil Kefalogiannis, Antonio López-Istúriz White, Matej Tonin, Massimiliano Salini, Łukasz Kohut, Loránt Vincze, Seán Kelly, Mirosława Nykiel, Michał Wawrykiewicz, Inese Vaidere, Michalis Hadjipantela, Miriam Lexmann
    on behalf of the PPE Group

    on the urgent need to protect religious minorities in Syria following the recent terrorist attack on Mar Elias Church in Damascus (2025/2798(RSP)) (B10-0347/2025)
    Yannis Maniatis, Francisco Assis, Marco Tarquinio, Hana Jalloul Muro, Evin Incir, Nikos Papandreou
    on behalf of the S&D Group

    Objection pursuant to Rule 114(3): amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1675 to add certain countries to the list of high-risk third countries, and to remove other countries from that list

    Motion for a resolution tabled under Rule 114(3) by Jorge Buxadé Villalba, on behalf of the PfE Group, on the Commission delegated regulation of 10 June 2025 amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1675 to add Algeria, Angola, Côte d’Ivoire, Kenya, Laos, Lebanon, Monaco, Namibia, Nepal and Venezuela to the list of high-risk third countries which have provided a written high-level political commitment to address the identified deficiencies and have developed an action plan with the FATF, and to remove Barbados, Gibraltar, Jamaica, Panama, the Philippines, Senegal, Uganda and the United Arab Emirates from that list (C(2025)3815) – 2025/2740(DEA)) (B10-0311/2025)

    Motion for a resolution tabled under Rule 114(3) by Rasmus Andresen, Kira Marie Peter-Hansen, on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group, Murielle Laurent, Brando Benifei, Kathleen Van Brempt, Francisco Assis, Raphaël Glucksmann, Aurore Lalucq, Cecilia Strada, Christophe Clergeau, Eric Sargiacomo, Nora Mebarek, Chloé Ridel, Claire Fita, Thomas Pellerin-Carlin, Birgit Sippel, Gabriele Bischoff, Lucia Annunziata, Sandro Ruotolo, Emma Rafowicz, Pina Picierno, Alessandra Moretti, Pierre Jouvet, Annalisa Corrado, Evelyn Regner, Jean-Marc Germain, Marco Tarquinio, Udo Bullmann, Alessandro Zan, on the Commission delegated regulation of 10 June 2025 amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1675 to add Algeria, Angola, Côte d’Ivoire, Kenya, Laos, Lebanon, Monaco, Namibia, Nepal and Venezuela to the list of high-risk third countries which have provided a written high-level political commitment to address the identified deficiencies and have developed an action plan with the FATF, and to remove Barbados, Gibraltar, Jamaica, Panama, the Philippines, Senegal, Uganda and the United Arab Emirates from that list (C(2025)3815) – 2025/2740(DEA)) (B10-0315/2025)

    Motion for a resolution tabled under Rule 114(3) by Damien Carême, Jussi Saramo, on behalf of The Left Group, on the Commission delegated regulation of 10 June 2025 amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1675 to add Algeria, Angola, Côte d’Ivoire, Kenya, Laos, Lebanon, Monaco, Namibia, Nepal and Venezuela to the list of high-risk third countries which have provided a written high-level political commitment to address the identified deficiencies and have developed an action plan with the FATF, and to remove Barbados, Gibraltar, Jamaica, Panama, the Philippines, Senegal, Uganda and the United Arab Emirates from that list (C(2025)03815 – 2025/2740(DEA)) (B10-0316/2025)

    Motion for a resolution tabled under Rule 114(3) by Luděk Niedermayer, Javier Zarzalejos, Fernando Navarrete Rojas, Isabel Benjumea Benjumea, Maravillas Abadía Jover, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Francisco José Millán Mon, Rosa Estaràs Ferragut, Gabriel Mato, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Esther Herranz García, Borja Giménez Larraz, Raúl de la Hoz Quintano, Susana Solís Pérez, Alma Ezcurra Almansa, Dolors Montserrat, Elena Nevado del Campo, Adrián Vázquez Lázara, Juan Ignacio Zoido Álvarez, Antonio López-Istúriz White, Marco Falcone, Esteban González Pons, Pablo Arias Echeverría, Nicolás Pascual de la Parte, Danuše Nerudová, David Casa, Tomáš Zdechovský, Kinga Kollár, Gabriella Gerzsenyi, Herbert Dorfmann, Christophe Gomart, Ondřej Kolář, Jan Farský, Michalis Hadjipantela, Siegfried Mureşan, Dan-Ştefan Motreanu, Virgil-Daniel Popescu, Iuliu Winkler, Gheorghe Falcă, Mircea-Gheorghe Hava, Daniel Buda, Paulius Saudargas, Maria Walsh, Loucas Fourlas, Verena Mertens, François-Xavier Bellamy, Karlo Ressler, Laurent Castillo, Sirpa Pietikäinen, Andrzej Halicki, on the Commission delegated regulation of 10 June 2025 amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1675 to add Algeria, Angola, Côte d’Ivoire, Kenya, Laos, Lebanon, Monaco, Namibia, Nepal and Venezuela to the list of high-risk third countries which have provided a written high-level political commitment to address the identified deficiencies and have developed an action plan with the FATF, and to remove Barbados, Gibraltar, Jamaica, Panama, the Philippines, Senegal, Uganda and the United Arab Emirates from that list (C(2025)03815 – 2025/2740(DEA)) (B10-0318/2025)

    The human cost of Russia’s war against Ukraine and the urgent need to end Russian aggression: the situation of illegally detained civilians and prisoners of war, and the continued bombing of civilians

    Motions for resolutions tabled under Rule 136(2) to wind up the debate:

    on the human cost of Russia’s war against Ukraine and the urgent need to end Russian aggression: the situation of illegally detained civilians and prisoners of war, and the continued bombing of civilians (2025/2710(RSP)) (B10-0303/2025)
    Özlem Demirel, Danilo Della Valle
    on behalf of The Left Group

    on the human cost of Russia’s war against Ukraine and the urgent need to end Russian aggression: the situation of illegally detained civilians and prisoners of war, and the continued bombing of civilians (2025/2710(RSP)) (B10-0304/2025)
    Sergey Lagodinsky, Markéta Gregorová, Ville Niinistö, Jutta Paulus, Mārtiņš Staķis
    on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

    on the human cost of Russia’s war against Ukraine and the urgent need to end Russian aggression: the situation of illegally detained civilians and prisoners of war, and the continued bombing of civilians (2025/2710(RSP)) (B10-0305/2025)
    Yannis Maniatis, Nacho Sánchez Amor, Thijs Reuten
    on behalf of the S&D Group

    on the human cost of Russia’s war against Ukraine and the urgent need to end Russian aggression: the situation of illegally detained civilians and prisoners of war, and the continued bombing of civilians (2025/2710(RSP)) (B10-0306/2025)
    Michael Gahler, Andrzej Halicki, Sebastião Bugalho, David McAllister, Siegfried Mureşan, Isabel Wiseler-Lima, Nicolás Pascual de la Parte, Mika Aaltola, Wouter Beke, Krzysztof Brejza, Lena Düpont, Jan Farský, Mircea-Gheorghe Hava, Rasa Juknevičienė, Ewa Kopacz, Andrey Kovatchev, Reinhold Lopatka, Antonio López-Istúriz White, Danuše Nerudová, Mirosława Nykiel, Liudas Mažylis, Ana Miguel Pedro, Paulius Saudargas, Oliver Schenk, Michał Szczerba, Davor Ivo Stier, Alice Teodorescu Måwe, Ingeborg Ter Laak, Riho Terras, Pekka Toveri, Inese Vaidere
    on behalf of the PPE Group

    on the human cost of Russia’s war against Ukraine and the urgent need to end Russian aggression: the situation of illegally detained civilians and prisoners of war, and the continued bombing of civilians (2025/2710(RSP)) (B10-0307/2025)
    Petras Auštrevičius, Malik Azmani, Dan Barna, Anna-Maja Henriksson, Ľubica Karvašová, Ilhan Kyuchyuk, Nathalie Loiseau, Urmas Paet, Marie-Agnes Strack-Zimmermann, Eugen Tomac, Hilde Vautmans, Lucia Yar, Dainius Žalimas
    on behalf of the Renew Group

    on the human cost of Russia’s war against Ukraine and the urgent need to end Russian aggression: the situation of illegally detained civilians and prisoners of war, and the continued bombing of civilians (2025/2710(RSP)) (B10-0308/2025)
    Michał Dworczyk, Małgorzata Gosiewska, Anna Zalewska, Reinis Pozņaks, Roberts Zīle, Sebastian Tynkkynen, Arkadiusz Mularczyk, Bogdan Rzońca, Rihards Kols, Alexandr Vondra, Ondřej Krutílek, Veronika Vrecionová, Aurelijus Veryga, Charlie Weimers, Joachim Stanisław Brudziński, Assita Kanko, Jadwiga Wiśniewska, Adam Bielan, Mariusz Kamiński
    on behalf of the ECR Group

    Joint motion for a resolution tabled under Rule 136(2) and (4):

    on the human cost of Russia’s war against Ukraine and the urgent need to end Russian aggression: the situation of illegally detained civilians and prisoners of war, and the continued bombing of civilians (2025/2710(RSP)) (RC-B10-0304/2025)
    (replacing motions for resolutions B10-0304/2025, B10-0305/2025, B10-0306/2025, B10-0307/2025 and B10-0308/2025)
    Michael Gahler, Andrzej Halicki, Sebastião Bugalho, David McAllister, Siegfried Mureşan, Isabel Wiseler-Lima, Nicolás Pascual de la Parte, Mika Aaltola, Wouter Beke, Krzysztof Brejza, Lena Düpont, Jan Farský, Mircea-Gheorghe Hava, Rasa Juknevičienė, Sandra Kalniete, Ewa Kopacz, Andrey Kovatchev, Reinhold Lopatka, Antonio López-Istúriz White, Liudas Mažylis, Danuše Nerudová, Mirosława Nykiel, Ana Miguel Pedro, Paulius Saudargas, Oliver Schenk, Michał Szczerba, Davor Ivo Stier, Alice Teodorescu Måwe, Ingeborg Ter Laak, Riho Terras, Matej Tonin, Pekka Toveri, Inese Vaidere
    on behalf of the PPE Group
    Yannis Maniatis, Nacho Sánchez Amor, Thijs Reuten
    on behalf of the S&D Group
    Adam Bielan, Michał Dworczyk, Małgorzata Gosiewska, Sebastian Tynkkynen, Roberts Zīle, Reinis Pozņaks, Ivaylo Valchev, Aurelijus Veryga, Mariusz Kamiński, Charlie Weimers, Alexandr Vondra, Assita Kanko, Joachim Stanisław Brudziński
    on behalf of the ECR Group
    Petras Auštrevičius, Malik Azmani, Dan Barna, Anna-Maja Henriksson, Ľubica Karvašová, Ilhan Kyuchyuk, Nathalie Loiseau, Urmas Paet, Marie-Agnes Strack-Zimmermann, Eugen Tomac, Hilde Vautmans, Lucia Yar, Dainius Žalimas
    on behalf of the Renew Group
    Sergey Lagodinsky
    on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group



    II. Documents received

    The following documents had been received from other institutions:

    – Proposal for transfer of appropriations INF 6/2025 – Section VI – Economic and Social Committee (N10-0026/2025 – C10-0131/2025 – 2025/2123(GBD))
    referred to committee responsible: BUDG

    – Proposal for transfer of appropriations V/INF-01/C/25 – Section V – Court of Auditors (N10-0027/2025 – C10-0132/2025 – 2025/2124(GBD))
    referred to committee responsible: BUDG

    – Proposal for transfer of appropriations V/INF-02/C/25 – Section V – Court of Auditors (N10-0028/2025 – C10-0133/2025 – 2025/2125(GBD))
    referred to committee responsible: BUDG

    – Proposal for transfer of appropriations V/INF-03/T/25 – Section V – Court of Auditors (N10-0029/2025 – C10-0134/2025 – 2025/2126(GBD))
    referred to committee responsible: BUDG

    – Proposal for transfer of appropriations V/INF-04/A/25 – Section V – Court of Auditors (N10-0030/2025 – C10-0135/2025 – 2025/2127(GBD))
    referred to committee responsible: BUDG

    – Proposal for transfer of appropriations V/INF-05/C/25 – Section V – Court of Auditors (N10-0031/2025 – C10-0136/2025 – 2025/2128(GBD))
    referred to committee responsible: BUDG

    – Proposal for transfer of appropriations 1/2025 – Section VIII – European Ombudsman (N10-0032/2025 – C10-0138/2025 – 2025/2129(GBD))
    referred to committee responsible: BUDG



    III. Delegated acts (Rule 114(2))

    Draft delegated acts forwarded to Parliament

    – Commission Delegated Regulation supplementing Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to regulatory technical standards specifying the minimum contents of the liquidity management policy and procedures for certain issuers of asset-referenced tokens and e-money tokens (C(2025)00602 – 2025/2777(DEA))

    Deadline for raising objections: 3 months from the date of receipt of 27 June 2025

    referred to committee responsible: ECON

    – Commission Delegated Regulation amending the regulatory technical standards laid down in Delegated Regulations (EU) 2017/583 and (EU) 2017/587 as regards transparency requirements for trading venues and investment firms in respect of bonds, structured finance products, emission allowances and equity instruments (C(2025)03104 – 2025/2773(DEA))

    Deadline for raising objections: 3 months from the date of receipt of 18 June 2025

    referred to committee responsible: ECON

    – Commission Delegated Regulation amending Regulation (EU) 2019/1241 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards an increase of the minimum mesh size when fishing for squid in the North Sea and North Western Waters (C(2025)03720 – 2025/2769(DEA))

    Deadline for raising objections: 2 months from the date of receipt of 16 June 2025

    Extension of the deadline for raising objections: 2 months at the European Parliament’s request

    referred to committee responsible: PECH

    – Commission Delegated Regulation correcting certain language versions of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2024/1366 supplementing Regulation (EU) 2019/943 of the European Parliament and of the Council by establishing a network code on sector-specific rules for cybersecurity aspects of cross-border electricity flows (C(2025)03833 – 2025/2774(DEA))

    Deadline for raising objections: 2 months from the date of receipt of 19 June 2025

    referred to committee responsible: ITRE

    – Commission Delegated Directive adapting to scientific and technical progress Annexes I and II to Directive (EU) 2022/1999 of the European Parliament and of the Council on uniform procedures for checks on the transport of dangerous goods by road (C(2025)03886 – 2025/2775(DEA))

    Deadline for raising objections: 2 months from the date of receipt of 23 June 2025

    referred to committee responsible: TRAN

    – Commission Delegated Regulation amending Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2534 on household tumble dryers regarding information on repairability and clarifying some aspects of the measurements and calculation methods, the product information sheet, the technical documentation and the verification procedure (C(2025)03986 – 2025/2782(DEA))

    Deadline for raising objections: 2 months from the date of receipt of 1 July 2025

    referred to committee responsible: ITRE

    – Commission Delegated Regulation amending Regulation (EU) 2019/1241 as regards the correction of the territorial scope of provisions concerning short-necked clam and red seabream (C(2025)04074 – 2025/2778(DEA))

    Deadline for raising objections: 2 months from the date of receipt of 27 June 2025

    referred to committee responsible: PECH

    – Commission Delegated Regulation supplementing Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to regulatory technical standards specifying the method for identifying the main risk driver of a position and for determining whether a transaction represents a long or a short position as referred to in Articles 94(3), 273a(3) and 325a(2) (C(2025)04105 – 2025/2781(DEA))

    Deadline for raising objections: 3 months from the date of receipt of 1 July 2025

    referred to committee responsible: ECON

    – Commission Delegated Regulation supplementing Directive (EU) 2024/1275 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the establishment of a comparative methodology framework for calculating cost-optimal levels of minimum energy performance requirements for buildings and building elements (C(2025)04133 – 2025/2779(DEA))

    Deadline for raising objections: 2 months from the date of receipt of 30 June 2025

    referred to committee responsible: ITRE
    opinion: TRAN

    – Commission Delegated Regulation supplementing Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to regulatory technical standards specifying the conditions for assessing the materiality of extensions of, and changes to, the use of alternative internal models, and changes to the subset of the modellable risk factors (C(2025)04338 – 2025/2805(DEA))

    Deadline for raising objections: 3 months from the date of receipt of 3 July 2025

    referred to committee responsible: ECON

    – Commission Delegated Regulation supplementing Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 of the European Parliament and of the Council by laying down the technical conditions and procedures under which providers of very large online platforms and of very large online search engines are to share data with vetted researchers (C(2025)04340 – 2025/2799(DEA))

    Deadline for raising objections: 3 months from the date of receipt of 2 July 2025

    referred to committee responsible: IMCO
    opinion: ITRE, JURI, LIBE

    – Commission Delegated Regulation amending Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2178 as regards the simplification of the content and presentation of information to be disclosed concerning environmentally sustainable activities and Commission Delegated Regulations (EU) 2021/2139 and (EU) 2023/2486 as regards simplification of certain technical screening criteria for determining whether economic activities cause no significant harm to environmental objectives (C(2025)04568 – 2025/2806(DEA))

    Deadline for raising objections: 4 months from the date of receipt of 4 July 2025

    referred to committee responsible: ECON, ENVI

    Draft delegated act for which the period for raising objections had been extended

    – Commission Delegated Regulation on the implementation of the Union’s international obligations, as referred to in Article 15(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council, under the Trade and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community, of the one part, and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, of the other part, as regards picked dogfish C(2025)03715 – 2025/2768(DEA)

    Deadline for raising objections: 2 months from the date of receipt of 13 June 2025

    Extension of the deadline for raising objections: 2 months at the request of the European Parliament

    referred to committee responsible: PECH



    IV. Transfers of appropriations and budgetary decisions

    In accordance with Article 31(1) of the Financial Regulation, the Committee on Budgets had decided to approve the European Commission’s transfers of appropriations DEC 08/2025, DEC 09/2025 and DEC 10/2025 – Section III – Commission.



    V. Action taken on Parliament’s positions and resolutions

    The Commission communication on the action taken on the resolutions adopted by Parliament during the March 2025 part-session (third part) was available on Parliament’s website.



    ATTENDANCE REGISTER

    Present:

    Aaltola Mika, Abadía Jover Maravillas, Adamowicz Magdalena, Aftias Georgios, Agirregoitia Martínez Oihane, Agius Peter, Agius Saliba Alex, Alexandraki Galato, Allione Grégory, Al-Sahlani Abir, Anadiotis Nikolaos, Anderson Christine, Andersson Li, Andresen Rasmus, Andrews Barry, Andriukaitis Vytenis Povilas, Androuët Mathilde, Angel Marc, Annemans Gerolf, Annunziata Lucia, Antoci Giuseppe, Arias Echeverría Pablo, Arłukowicz Bartosz, Arnaoutoglou Sakis, Arndt Anja, Arvanitis Konstantinos, Asens Llodrà Jaume, Assis Francisco, Attard Daniel, Aubry Manon, Auštrevičius Petras, Axinia Adrian-George, Azmani Malik, Bajada Thomas, Baljeu Jeannette, Ballarín Cereza Laura, Bardella Jordan, Barley Katarina, Barna Dan, Barrena Arza Pernando, Bartulica Stephen Nikola, Bartůšek Nikola, Bausemer Arno, Bay Nicolas, Bay Christophe, Beke Wouter, Beleris Fredis, Bellamy François-Xavier, Benjumea Benjumea Isabel, Beňová Monika, Bentele Hildegard, Berendsen Tom, Berger Stefan, Berg Sibylle, Berlato Sergio, Bernhuber Alexander, Biedroń Robert, Bielan Adam, Bischoff Gabriele, Blaha Ľuboš, Blinkevičiūtė Vilija, Blom Rachel, Bloss Michael, Bocheński Tobiasz, Boeselager Damian, Bogdan Ioan-Rareş, Bonaccini Stefano, Bonte Barbara, Borchia Paolo, Borrás Pabón Mireia, Borvendég Zsuzsanna, Borzan Biljana, Bosanac Gordan, Boßdorf Irmhild, Bosse Stine, Botenga Marc, Boyer Gilles, Boylan Lynn, Brandstätter Helmut, Brasier-Clain Marie-Luce, Braun Grzegorz, Brejza Krzysztof, Bricmont Saskia, Brnjac Nikolina, Brudziński Joachim Stanisław, Bryłka Anna, Buchheit Markus, Buczek Tomasz, Buda Daniel, Buda Waldemar, Bugalho Sebastião, Buła Andrzej, Bullmann Udo, Buxadé Villalba Jorge, Bystron Petr, Bžoch Jaroslav, Camara Mélissa, Canfin Pascal, Carberry Nina, Cârciu Gheorghe, Carême Damien, Casa David, Caspary Daniel, Cassart Benoit, Castillo Laurent, del Castillo Vera Pilar, Cavazzini Anna, Cavedagna Stefano, Ceccardi Susanna, Cepeda José, Ceulemans Estelle, Chahim Mohammed, Chaibi Leila, Chastel Olivier, Chinnici Caterina, Christensen Asger, Ciccioli Carlo, Cifrová Ostrihoňová Veronika, Ciriani Alessandro, Cisint Anna Maria, Clausen Per, Clergeau Christophe, Cormand David, Corrado Annalisa, Costanzo Vivien, Cotrim De Figueiredo João, Cowen Barry, Cremer Tobias, Crespo Díaz Carmen, Cristea Andi, Crosetto Giovanni, Cunha Paulo, Dahl Henrik, Danielsson Johan, Dauchy Marie, Dávid Dóra, David Ivan, Decaro Antonio, de la Hoz Quintano Raúl, Della Valle Danilo, Deloge Valérie, De Masi Fabio, De Meo Salvatore, Demirel Özlem, Deutsch Tamás, Devaux Valérie, Dibrani Adnan, Diepeveen Ton, Dieringer Elisabeth, Dîncu Vasile, Di Rupo Elio, Disdier Mélanie, Dobrev Klára, Doherty Regina, Doleschal Christian, Dömötör Csaba, Do Nascimento Cabral Paulo, Donazzan Elena, Dorfmann Herbert, Dostalova Klara, Dostál Ondřej, Droese Siegbert Frank, Düpont Lena, Dworczyk Michał, Ecke Matthias, Ehler Christian, Ehlers Marieke, Eriksson Sofie, Erixon Dick, Eroglu Engin, Estaràs Ferragut Rosa, Everding Sebastian, Ezcurra Almansa Alma, Falcă Gheorghe, Falcone Marco, Farantouris Nikolas, Farreng Laurence, Farský Jan, Ferber Markus, Ferenc Viktória, Fernández Jonás, Fidanza Carlo, Fiocchi Pietro, Firmenich Ruth, Fita Claire, Flanagan Luke Ming, Fourlas Loucas, Fourreau Emma, Fragkos Emmanouil, Freund Daniel, Frigout Anne-Sophie, Fritzon Heléne, Froelich Tomasz, Fuglsang Niels, Funchion Kathleen, Furet Angéline, Furore Mario, Gahler Michael, Gál Kinga, Galán Estrella, Gálvez Lina, Gambino Alberico, García Hermida-Van Der Walle Raquel, Garraud Jean-Paul, Gasiuk-Pihowicz Kamila, Geadi Geadis, Gedin Hanna, Geese Alexandra, Geier Jens, Geisel Thomas, Gemma Chiara, Georgiou Giorgos, Gerbrandy Gerben-Jan, Germain Jean-Marc, Gerzsenyi Gabriella, Geuking Niels, Gieseke Jens, Giménez Larraz Borja, Girauta Vidal Juan Carlos, Glavak Sunčana, Glück Andreas, Glucksmann Raphaël, Goerens Charles, Gomart Christophe, Gomes Isilda, Gómez López Sandra, Gonçalves Bruno, Gonçalves Sérgio, González Casares Nicolás, González Pons Esteban, Gori Giorgio, Gosiewska Małgorzata, Gotink Dirk, Gozi Sandro, Grapini Maria, Gražulis Petras, Gregorová Markéta, Grims Branko, Griset Catherine, Gronkiewicz-Waltz Hanna, Groothuis Bart, Grossmann Elisabeth, Grudler Christophe, Gualmini Elisabetta, Guarda Cristina, Guetta Bernard, Guzenina Maria, Győri Enikő, Gyürk András, Hadjipantela Michalis, Hahn Svenja, Haider Roman, Halicki Andrzej, Hansen Niels Flemming, Hassan Rima, Hauser Gerald, Häusling Martin, Hava Mircea-Gheorghe, Heide Hannes, Heinäluoma Eero, Henriksson Anna-Maja, Herbst Niclas, Herranz García Esther, Hohlmeier Monika, Hojsík Martin, Holmgren Pär, Hölvényi György, Homs Ginel Alicia, Humberto Sérgio, Ijabs Ivars, Imart Céline, Incir Evin, Inselvini Paolo, Iovanovici Şoşoacă Diana, Jamet France, Jarubas Adam, Jerković Romana, Jongen Marc, Joński Dariusz, Joron Virginie, Jouvet Pierre, Joveva Irena, Juknevičienė Rasa, Junco García Nora, Jungbluth Alexander, Kabilov Taner, Kalfon François, Kaliňák Erik, Kaljurand Marina, Kalniete Sandra, Kamiński Mariusz, Kanev Radan, Kanko Assita, Karlsbro Karin, Kartheiser Fernand, Karvašová Ľubica, Katainen Elsi, Kefalogiannis Emmanouil, Kelleher Billy, Keller Fabienne, Kelly Seán, Kemp Martine, Kennes Rudi, Khan Mary, Kircher Sophia, Knafo Sarah, Knotek Ondřej, Kobosko Michał, Köhler Stefan, Kohut Łukasz, Kokalari Arba, Kolář Ondřej, Kollár Kinga, Kols Rihards, Konečná Kateřina, Kopacz Ewa, Körner Moritz, Kountoura Elena, Kovatchev Andrey, Krištopans Vilis, Kruis Sebastian, Krutílek Ondřej, Kubín Tomáš, Kuhnke Alice, Kulja András Tivadar, Kulmuni Katri, Kyllönen Merja, Kyuchyuk Ilhan, Lagodinsky Sergey, Lakos Eszter, Lalucq Aurore, Lange Bernd, Laššáková Judita, László András, Latinopoulou Afroditi, Laurent Murielle, Laureti Camilla, Laykova Rada, Lazarov Ilia, Lazarus Luis-Vicențiu, Le Callennec Isabelle, Leggeri Fabrice, Lenaers Jeroen, Leonardelli Julien, Lewandowski Janusz, Lexmann Miriam, Liese Peter, Lins Norbert, Loiseau Nathalie, Løkkegaard Morten, Lopatka Reinhold, López Javi, López Aguilar Juan Fernando, López-Istúriz White Antonio, Lövin Isabella, Luena César, Łukacijewska Elżbieta Katarzyna, Lupo Giuseppe, McAllister David, Madison Jaak, Maestre Cristina, Magoni Lara, Magyar Péter, Maij Marit, Maląg Marlena, Manda Claudiu, Mandl Lukas, Maniatis Yannis, Mantovani Mario, Maran Pierfrancesco, Marczułajtis-Walczak Jagna, Maréchal Marion, Marino Ignazio Roberto, Marquardt Erik, Martín Frías Jorge, Martins Catarina, Martusciello Fulvio, Marzà Ibáñez Vicent, Mato Gabriel, Matthieu Sara, Mavrides Costas, Maydell Eva, Mayer Georg, Mazurek Milan, Mažylis Liudas, McNamara Michael, Mebarek Nora, Mehnert Alexandra, Meimarakis Vangelis, Meleti Eleonora, Mendes Ana Catarina, Mendia Idoia, Mertens Verena, Mesure Marina, Metsola Roberta, Metz Tilly, Mikser Sven, Milazzo Giuseppe, Millán Mon Francisco José, Minchev Nikola, Miranda Paz Ana, Molnár Csaba, Montero Irene, Montserrat Dolors, Morace Carolina, Morano Nadine, Moreira de Sá Tiago, Moreno Sánchez Javier, Moretti Alessandra, Motreanu Dan-Ştefan, Mularczyk Arkadiusz, Müller Piotr, Mullooly Ciaran, Mureşan Siegfried, Muşoiu Ştefan, Nagyová Jana, Nardella Dario, Navarrete Rojas Fernando, Negrescu Victor, Nemec Matjaž, Nerudová Danuše, Nesci Denis, Neuhoff Hans, Neumann Hannah, Nica Dan, Niebler Angelika, Niedermayer Luděk, Niinistö Ville, Nikolaou-Alavanos Lefteris, Nikolic Aleksandar, Ní Mhurchú Cynthia, Noichl Maria, Nordqvist Rasmus, Novakov Andrey, Nykiel Mirosława, Obajtek Daniel, Ódor Ľudovít, Oetjen Jan-Christoph, Oliveira João, Olivier Philippe, Omarjee Younous, Ondruš Branislav, Ó Ríordáin Aodhán, Orlando Leoluca, Ozdoba Jacek, Paet Urmas, Pajín Leire, Palmisano Valentina, Panayiotou Fidias, Papadakis Kostas, Papandreou Nikos, Pappas Nikos, Pascual de la Parte Nicolás, Patriciello Aldo, Paulus Jutta, Pedro Ana Miguel, Pedulla’ Gaetano, Pellerin-Carlin Thomas, Peltier Guillaume, Penkova Tsvetelina, Pennelle Gilles, Pérez Alvise, Peter-Hansen Kira Marie, Petrov Hristo, Picaro Michele, Picierno Pina, Picula Tonino, Piera Pascale, Pietikäinen Sirpa, Pimpie Pierre, Piperea Gheorghe, de la Pisa Carrión Margarita, Pokorná Jermanová Jaroslava, Polato Daniele, Polfjärd Jessica, Popescu Virgil-Daniel, Pozņaks Reinis, Prebilič Vladimir, Princi Giusi, Protas Jacek, Pürner Friedrich, Rackete Carola, Radev Emil, Radtke Dennis, Ratas Jüri, Razza Ruggero, Rechagneux Julie, Regner Evelyn, Repasi René, Repp Sabrina, Ressler Karlo, Riba i Giner Diana, Ricci Matteo, Ridel Chloé, Riehl Nela, Ripa Manuela, Rodrigues André, Ros Sempere Marcos, Roth Neveďalová Katarína, Rougé André, Ruissen Bert-Jan, Ruotolo Sandro, Rzońca Bogdan, Saeidi Arash, Salini Massimiliano, Salis Ilaria, Salla Aura, Sánchez Amor Nacho, Sanchez Julien, Sancho Murillo Elena, Saramo Jussi, Sardone Silvia, Šarec Marjan, Sargiacomo Eric, Satouri Mounir, Saudargas Paulius, Sbai Majdouline, Sberna Antonella, Schaldemose Christel, Schaller-Baross Ernő, Schenk Oliver, Scheuring-Wielgus Joanna, Schieder Andreas, Schilling Lena, Schneider Christine, Schnurrbusch Volker, Schwab Andreas, Scuderi Benedetta, Seekatz Ralf, Sell Alexander, Serrano Sierra Rosa, Sidl Günther, Sienkiewicz Bartłomiej, Sieper Lukas, Simon Sven, Singer Christine, Sinkevičius Virginijus, Sippel Birgit, Sjöstedt Jonas, Śmiszek Krzysztof, Smith Anthony, Smit Sander, Sokol Tomislav, Solier Diego, Solís Pérez Susana, Sommen Liesbet, Sonneborn Martin, Sorel Malika, Sousa Silva Hélder, Søvndal Villy, Squarta Marco, Staķis Mārtiņš, Stancanelli Raffaele, Ștefănuță Nicolae, Steger Petra, Stier Davor Ivo, Storm Kristoffer, Stöteler Sebastiaan, Stoyanov Stanislav, Strack-Zimmermann Marie-Agnes, Strada Cecilia, Streit Joachim, Strik Tineke, Strolenberg Anna, Sturdza Şerban Dimitrie, Stürgkh Anna, Sypniewski Marcin, Szczerba Michał, Szekeres Pál, Szydło Beata, Tamburrano Dario, Tânger Corrêa António, Tarczyński Dominik, Tarquinio Marco, Tarr Zoltán, Târziu Claudiu-Richard, Tavares Carla, Tegethoff Kai, Temido Marta, Teodorescu Georgiana, Teodorescu Måwe Alice, Terheş Cristian, Ter Laak Ingeborg, Terras Riho, Tertsch Hermann, Thionnet Pierre-Romain, Timgren Beatrice, Tinagli Irene, Tobback Bruno, Tobé Tomas, Tolassy Rody, Tomac Eugen, Tomašič Zala, Tomaszewski Waldemar, Tomc Romana, Tonin Matej, Toom Jana, Topo Raffaele, Torselli Francesco, Tosi Flavio, Toussaint Marie, Tovaglieri Isabella, Toveri Pekka, Tridico Pasquale, Trochu Laurence, Tsiodras Dimitris, Turek Filip, Tynkkynen Sebastian, Uhrík Milan, Vaidere Inese, Valchev Ivaylo, Vălean Adina, Valet Matthieu, Van Brempt Kathleen, Van Brug Anouk, van den Berg Brigitte, Vandendriessche Tom, Van Dijck Kris, Van Lanschot Reinier, Van Leeuwen Jessika, Vannacci Roberto, Van Overtveldt Johan, Van Sparrentak Kim, Varaut Alexandre, Vasconcelos Ana, Vasile-Voiculescu Vlad, Vautmans Hilde, Vedrenne Marie-Pierre, Ventola Francesco, Verheyen Sabine, Verougstraete Yvan, Veryga Aurelijus, Vešligaj Marko, Vicsek Annamária, Vieira Catarina, Vigenin Kristian, Vilimsky Harald, Vincze Loránt, Vind Marianne, Vistisen Anders, Vivaldini Mariateresa, Volgin Petar, von der Schulenburg Michael, Vondra Alexandr, Voss Axel, Vozemberg-Vrionidi Elissavet, Vrecionová Veronika, Vázquez Lázara Adrián, Waitz Thomas, Walsh Maria, Walsmann Marion, Warborn Jörgen, Warnke Jan-Peter, Wąsik Maciej, Wawrykiewicz Michał, Wcisło Marta, Wechsler Andrea, Weimers Charlie, Werbrouck Séverine, Wiesner Emma, Wiezik Michal, Wilmès Sophie, Winkler Iuliu, Winzig Angelika, Wiseler-Lima Isabel, Wiśniewska Jadwiga, Wölken Tiemo, Wolters Lara, Yar Lucia, Yon-Courtin Stéphanie, Yoncheva Elena, Zacharia Maria, Zajączkowska-Hernik Ewa, Zalewska Anna, Žalimas Dainius, Zan Alessandro, Zarzalejos Javier, Zdechovský Tomáš, Zdrojewski Bogdan Andrzej, Zijlstra Auke, Zingaretti Nicola, Złotowski Kosma, Zoido Álvarez Juan Ignacio, Zovko Željana, Zver Milan

    Excused:

    Burkhardt Delara, Friis Sigrid, Hazekamp Anja

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – ETS/FuelEU Maritime and IMO NZF – risk of double taxation – P-002734/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Priority question for written answer  P-002734/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Anna Maria Cisint (PfE), Paolo Borchia (PfE), Susanna Ceccardi (PfE), Carlo Ciccioli (ECR), Carlo Fidanza (ECR), Roman Haider (PfE), Vilis Krištopans (PfE), Nicola Procaccini (ECR), Silvia Sardone (PfE), Roberto Vannacci (PfE), Marie-Luce Brasier-Clain (PfE)

    At the 83rd session of the Marine Environment Protection Committee (MEPC83) in April 2025, the Net-Zero Framework (NZF) was adopted at the IMO (International Maritime Organisation) as a medium-term measure to reduce emissions from international maritime transport. Its implementing regulations and details will be defined at the MEPC’s extraordinary session in October 2025.

    The NZF encompasses a rigorous path towards reducing the environmental impact of fuels used on board ships, together with ambitious taxation of CO2 emissions, with a view to achieving net-zero emissions by 2050, in line with the objectives of the Paris Agreement and the European Climate Law. The measure, which the EU has been pushing for, is global and allows for the decarbonisation of the sector without market distortions.

    The EU’s regional measures – the Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) and FuelEU Maritime – already significantly penalise the EU maritime and port sector compared to third countries and will become redundant, leading to unsustainable double taxation for the sector: they should therefore be abolished.

    The very letter of the EU ETS Directive and FuelEU Maritime Regulation requires the Commission to review the rules should there be an IMO agreement, in order to avoid ‘significant’ double taxation.

    In light of the above:

    • 1.What criteria does the Commission use to judge whether double taxation is significant?
    • 2.Does it agree there is a need to comprehensively ensure a global level playing field for EU companies in the maritime sector?

    Submitted: 3.7.2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI: Xsolis’ AI-Driven Solution, New Features Evaluated in KLAS Second Look Report

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    FRANKLIN, Tenn., July 08, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Xsolis, an AI-driven technology company that reduces administrative waste by enabling collaboration between healthcare providers and payers, was featured today in the KLAS Second Look Report, “Xsolis Platform 2025: Improving Utilization Management, Length of Stay & Denial Performance Through AI-Driven Offerings in the Mid-Revenue Cycle.” The KLAS Second Look Report focuses on how the customer experience has changed over the past four years, including as a result of enhancements made available within Dragonfly, the next generation of the company’s AI-driven platform.

    KLAS is an independent research organization that helps healthcare providers make informed technology decisions by offering accurate, honest, and impartial vendor performance information. KLAS interviewed Xsolis clients in early 2025 for a second look, and reports the following anonymized key findings:

    • Respondents report satisfaction within the Key Performance Indicators:
      • Supports integration goals
      • Product has needed functionality (delivers solutions as expected)
      • Executive involvement
      • Likely to recommend
    • 89% of KLAS-surveyed customers report using Xsolis’ AI technology to minimize preventable denials
    • 91% of respondents say they are Satisfied or Highly Satisfied with Overall Performance
    • 88% of respondents say they saw outcomes Immediately, Within 6 Months, or Within 6-12 Months
    • 78% engage in payer-provider communications through the Dragonfly platform
    • Respondents who have been on Xsolis’ AI-driven platform for more than one year report excitement about new updates and functionalities that are being offered as a result of Dragonfly
    • Respondents report the top reasons they selected the Xsolis platform as: advanced AI technology, excellent customer service, seamless EHR integration, and positive references
    • Respondents say the Xsolis platform has reduced the length of patient stays, saved on costs, and improved observation rates and denials rates

    “What has changed with our most recent KLAS survey effort is our expanded footprint and the problems Xsolis solves, including optimizing length-of-stay and increasing payer-provider collaboration, which have been critical in bringing relief to our clients,” said Joan Butters, CEO and co-founder of Xsolis. “As we enhance our solutions to deliver frictionless healthcare in meaningful, new ways for our clients, it is both validating and informative to learn their feedback as we continue to meet their evolving needs.”

    A Kaiser Family Foundation survey from 2023 revealed claims denials are up, with nearly one in five adults experiencing health insurance claim denials in the previous year. Adjudicating denials costs just under $20 billion a year, and around half of denials are ultimately overturned — a costly problem that can be improved with tools that accelerate payer-provider alignment. Late 2024 marked an inflection point for payer-provider friction and how it affects the patient experience, accelerating the need for transparency and reform.

    Xsolis was featured in a KLAS Top 20 Emerging Solutions Report and as one of the top five solutions for reducing the cost of care in 2022 and was listed in 2025 as No. 1 Best in KLAS for Physician Advisory Services for the fourth year. A payer client’s and provider client’s use of Xsolis’ shared platform was recognized in a 2023 KLAS Points of Light Case Study, which highlights successful payer-provider initiatives that lead to an improved patient experience.

    As a pioneer in the practical, effective application of AI in healthcare, Xsolis has been helping its clients make more informed medical necessity decisions during utilization reviews since 2013. Dragonfly represents the next generation of the company’s AI-driven platform and was launched in late 2024. The platform is powered by Predictive AI models, offers new Generative AI tools, and can be augmented with advanced analytic packages such as Navigate to reduce length of stay or Revenue Integrity Insights. Xsolis also offers Denials Management Services and Physician Advisory Services. To date, Xsolis’ solutions are used in more than 500 hospitals nationwide, with two-thirds having shared AI platform access with their networked health plans.

    To learn more about Xsolis, please visit: www.xsolis.com

    Download the KLAS Second Look Report here: https://www.xsolis.com/2025-klas-second-look-report/

    KLAS subscribers can access the report here: https://klasresearch.com/report/xsolis-platform-2025-improving-utilization-management-length-of-stay-and-denial-performance-through-ai-driven-offerings-in-the-mid-revenue-cycle/3746

    About Xsolis
    Xsolis is an AI-driven technology company that reduces administrative waste by enabling collaboration between healthcare providers and payers. Dragonfly®, its AI-driven proprietary platform, is the first and only solution to use real-time predictive analytics to continuously assign an objective medical necessity score and assess the anticipated level of care for every patient, enabling more efficiency across the healthcare system. Xsolis is headquartered in Franklin, Tennessee. For more information, visit www.xsolis.com.

    About KLAS
    KLAS is a research and insights firm on a global mission to improve healthcare. Working with thousands of healthcare professionals and clinicians, KLAS gathers data and insights on software and services to deliver timely reports and performance data that represent provider and payer voices and act as catalysts for improving vendor performance. The KLAS research team publishes reports covering the most pressing questions facing healthcare technology today, including emerging technology insights, that provide early insights on the future of healthcare technology solutions. KLAS also fosters measurement and collaboration between healthcare providers and payers and best practice adoption. Learn more at klasresearch.com.

    The MIL Network –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Tuberville Honors Elaine McLeod of Troy as July “Veteran of the Month”

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Alabama Tommy Tuberville
    WASHINGTON – Today,U.S. Senator Tommy Tuberville (R-AL) released a video honoring U.S. Army Corporal Elaine McLeod as the July “Veteran of the Month.”
    Excerpts from Sen. Tuberville’s remarks can be found below, and complete remarks can be found here.
    “Veterans are the very heartbeat of the Wiregrass, and they bond together to support many great causes in the region. Among those leading the way is Corporal Elaine McLeod of Troy.
    The daughter of a Korean War veteran, Elaine joined the Army after graduating from high school in 1974. She served as a military police officer, doing everything from guarding Air Force One to scrubbing floors of the barracks. Elaine says the Army gave her the discipline that was missing in her early years. In 2000, Elaine returned home to Troy where she quickly began getting involved with local veteran organizations—including the Montgomery Chapter of Vietnam Veterans for America, AMVETS, and the Ozark American Legion Post where she now serves as the Commander. Elaine has worked tirelessly to address needs in the veteran community—including homelessness and food insecurity.
    […]
    Alabama is grateful for Elaine’s willingness to take on challenges to improve quality of life for our heroes. It’s my honor to recognize her as the July ‘Veteran of the Month.’”
    Senator Tuberville recognizes a different Alabama veteran each month for their service and contribution to their community. Constituents can nominate an Alabama veteran and submit their information to Senator Tuberville’s office for consideration by emailing press_office@tuberville.senate.gov. 
    Senator Tommy Tuberville represents Alabama in the United States Senate and is a member of the Senate Armed Services, Agriculture, Veterans’ Affairs, HELP and Aging Committees.

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Secure all food, bait and rubbish on K’gari

    Source: Tasmania Police

    Issued: 2 Jul 2025

    Open larger image

    This dingo has removed the lid from a jar of peanut butter found in rubbish.

    Open larger image

    Dingoes will tear open tents and containers to access food and rubbish.

    Photos of damaged tents show the incredible sense of smell dingoes have, and their capacity for opportunistic feeding in the camping areas on K’gari.

    Taken by rangers from the Department of Environment, Tourism, Science and Innovation (DETSI), the photos show the results of food and rubbish being incorrectly stored by campers.

    Dr Linda Behrendorff said dingoes recently gorged themselves on accessible food and rubbish after breaking into a tent and then began hanging around the camping area.

    “Dingoes are opportunistic by nature and have torn open tents, can chew eskies open and knock over bins before ripping rubbish bags apart,” Dr Behrendorff said.

    “Wildlife scavenging around camping areas is a common occurrence, and the problem with leaving food or rubbish where dingoes or other wildlife can get it makes them less fearful of humans.

    “Dingoes don’t differentiate between food and rubbish, and they can start approaching people for food which puts dingoes and people at risk.

    “Even in fenced areas, campers must ensure that all food and rubbish is stored in strong, secure containers and kept in an inaccessible place, such as a vehicle cabin or an enclosed ute tray.

    “A tent or annexe is not a secure place, and dingoes have also taken people’s belongings such as clothing, toiletries or shoes that carry the smell of food.

    “Fishers should bury fish frames and unused bait at least 50cm deep in the sand to prevent dingoes digging it up.

    “During the school holidays, we’re asking everyone to secure your camping area, secure your food and shoo dingoes away if they’re lingering nearby.”

    Bins are provided on K’gari, and people are encouraged to use bins properly and never leave bags of rubbish beside bins.

    Reasons to prevent dingoes getting access to food and rubbish:

    • Opportunistic feeders: They will eat a wide variety of foods, including rubbish.
    • Habituation: Feeding dingoes or leaving food unattended can lead to them losing their natural fear of humans and becoming familiar and habituated to human-provided food, making them more likely to scavenge.
    • Food availability: There is plenty of natural food for dingoes on K’gari. They are opportunistic predators, and if food is readily available in the form of rubbish, they will likely scavenge for it, especially if it is easier to obtain than hunting.
    • Never feed dingoes: It is illegal and can have serious consequences for both people and dingoes.
    • If dingoes don’t find food at your camping area, they are more likely to hunt or scavenge for natural food.

    It is an offence to deliberately or inadvertently feed dingoes. On the spot fines include $2,580 for deliberately feeding a dingo and $464 for food availability. The maximum court-imposed penalty for feeding dingoes is $26,614.

    MIL OSI News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: 2025 Great New York State Fair Tickets on Sale, July 7

    Source: US State of New York

    overnor Kathy Hochul announced that admission and parking for The 2025 Great New York State Fair went on sale today. Packed with value, a single admission ticket costs $8 and includes access to all grounds entertainment and the Chevrolet Music Series, while parking costs $12. In addition, a Frequent Fairgoer ticket option is available for $25. Admission remains free for those aged 65 and older along with children 12 years old and under, continuing to ensure that The Fair is one of the most affordable fairs in the nation, providing an accessible space for the whole family to get offline and get outside.

    For those superfans who are planning to be at The Fair at least four days over its 13-day stretch, the Frequent Fairgoer option again allows the ticket holder to enter The Fair once a day, every day during The Fair. A Frequent Fairgoer ticket is non-transferable and is available exclusively online.

    “The Great New York State Fair is a time-honored tradition and a cornerstone of our summers here in New York State,” Governor Hochul said. “People shouldn’t have to break the bank to have fun. As of today, tickets for this affordable, family-friendly event are now on sale. New Yorkers – get your tickets today and I’ll see you at The Fair this summer!”

    New York State Agriculture Commissioner Richard A. Ball said, “Summer means one thing – it’s time for The Great New York State Fair! I encourage everyone to get their tickets now and start planning their trip to learn about New York agriculture, sample some delicious foods, check out some fantastic entertainment, and so much more.”

    New York State Fair Director Julie LaFave said, “The 2025 Great New York State Fair is just 43 days away, so now’s the time for fairgoers to start planning a day (or 13!) of unforgettable summer fun. From animals, to hundreds of commercial attractions, scores of exciting midway rides, and dozens of big-name entertainers, The Fair has something in store for the whole family and so many great memories waiting to be made. We strongly encourage fairgoers to make their ticket and parking arrangements before arriving at the grounds. With close to 100,000 people in the vicinity of the Fairgrounds daily, purchasing in advance helps to keep lines to a minimum and ensure fairgoers move through the gates as quickly as possible to experience all the fun that The Fair has to offer! From our Fair family to yours – we can’t wait to see you soon!”

    Fair admission includes the ability to watch dozens of national recording acts in the Chevrolet Music Series, including Grammy winners, Rock and Roll Hall of Fame performers, and so many more. There will be a daily 1:00 p.m. and 6:00 p.m. concert at Chevy Court (located near Gate 1) with an extra show at 9:00 p.m. on Friday nights, as well as a daily 8:00 p.m. concert at Suburban Park (located on the western end of the Fairgrounds, beyond the Midway).

    Updated concert schedules are available on The Fair’s website at pages dedicated to Chevy Court and Suburban Park.

    HOW TO PURCHASE TICKETS AND PARKING TO THE GREAT NEW YORK STATE FAIR

    There are three ways to buy admission tickets and/or parking: online, over the phone, and in-person from August 20 through September 1.

    • Online: The link to purchase admission tickets and parking will go live at 9:00 a.m. on Monday, July 7, at The Great New York State Fair’s website.
    • Over the Phone: Starting July 7, tickets and parking may also be purchased over the phone by calling Etix toll-free at 1-800-514-3849 from 9:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. Monday through Saturday, and 12:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. on Sunday.
    • At the Gate: Beginning Wednesday, August 20, kiosks positioned at all gates will be available for electronic ticket purchases. To minimize waiting time for the kiosks, large signs featuring QR codes will also be available at all entrances and in parking lots so fairgoers can use their smartphone to purchase tickets.

    Including fees, the total cost for fairgoers will be:

    • Admission: $8.32 per ticket ($8 admission, ticket fee of 14 cents, credit card processing fee of 18 cents)
    • Frequent Fairgoer: $25.70 ($25 Frequent Fairgoer pass, ticket fee of 14 cents, credit card processing fee of 56 cents; note that the Frequent Fairgoer passes are available exclusively online)
    • Parking: $12.41 per vehicle ($12 parking, ticket fee of 14 cents, credit card processing fee of 27 cents)

    Upon arrival to The Fair, drivers must show their parking ticket to lot attendants electronically on their phones or through a printed copy. Please note that again this year, EZPass Plus is not an option for parking. Parking passes may be purchased with a credit card at the lots. Please note that cash is not accepted.

    There will be no cash sales at The Fair’s entrance gates or in parking lots. Machines that can convert cash into a usable card will be positioned at The Fair’s Main Gate for those fairgoers bringing cash to the grounds.

    HOURS OF OPERATION

    The Great New York State Fair begins on Wednesday, August 20 and continues through Labor Day, September 1. The Fair’s hours of operation are from 9:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. every day, except for Labor Day, when The Fair closes at 9:00 p.m. Gates open to the public at 9:00 a.m. and close at 9:00 p.m. every day except for Labor Day, Monday, September 4, when no entry will be permitted after 8:00 p.m.

    Parking Hours: The Orange parking lot opens at 9:00 a.m. daily, with the Brown and Pink lots opening daily at 6:00 a.m., and the Gray lots opening daily at 8:30 a.m. The Willis Ave parking lot opens at 10:00 a.m., but will only be accessible only on Friday, Saturday, Sunday, and Labor Day.

    Trams: For the convenience of fairgoers, trams will run continuously on the Fairgrounds, stopping at 10 stops from 9:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.* every day. Plus, a dedicated ADA shuttle runs between the Gray Accessible Parking lot, located outside Gate 10, to Tram Stop #3 at the rear entrance of the Horticulture Building from 9:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m.* each day.

    *Note, on Monday, September 1, the trams stop running one hour earlier.

    CENTRO’S PARK-N-RIDE DIRECT SHUTTLE SERVICE TO AND FROM THE FAIR

    Centro’s Park-N-Ride direct shuttle service will provide passengers with transportation from the Centro Transit Hub Downtown, Long Branch Park, and Destiny USA to and from the Fairgrounds with drop-off and pick-up points to the left of the Main Gate. To ride the shuttle one way, the fee is $1 for adults, and 50 cents for senior citizens, children six to nine years old, and those who are living with disabilities. The last shuttle leaves the Fairgrounds each day at 11:15 p.m. Shuttles will run on a limited schedule after 9:00 p.m. on September 1 as The Fair closes earlier that day.

    WADE SHOWS MIDWAY: TICKETS ON SALE SOON

    Advance tickets for The Fair’s famous Midway, operated by Wade Shows, will go on sale in the coming weeks. Stay up-to-date with The Fair’s social media and website to be the first to hear when these tickets are available for purchase.

    ABOUT THE GREAT NEW YORK STATE FAIR

    Founded in 1841, The Great New York State Fair showcases the best of New York agriculture, provides top-quality entertainment, and is a key piece of the state’s CNY Rising strategy of growing the Central New York economy through tourism. It is the oldest fair in the United States and is consistently recognized as being among the top five state fairs in the nation.

    The New York State Fairgrounds is a 375-acre exhibit and entertainment complex that operates all year. Audiences are encouraged to learn more about The Great New York State Fair online, browse photos on Flickr, and follow the fun on Facebook, X (formerly Twitter), and Instagram.

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI Security: MEDIA ADVISORY: Coast Guard Southwest District to hold Change of Command Ceremony

    Source: United States Coast Guard

     

    07/05/2025 12:10 PM EDT

    ALAMEDA, Calif. – Coast Guard Southwest District is scheduled to host a Change of Command Ceremony at Coast Guard Island, Tuesday. Rear Adm. Jeffrey Novak will relieve Rear Adm. Joseph Buzzella, as commander of Coast Guard Southwest District with Vice Adm. Andrew Tiongson, commander, Pacific Area, presiding. WHO: Vice Adm. Andrew Tiongson; Rear Adm. Joseph Buzzella and Rear Adm. Jeffrey Novak WHAT: Coast Guard Southwest District Change of Command Ceremony WHEN: Tuesday, July 8 at 10 a.m. WHERE: Freedom Park on Coast Guard Island Editor’s Note: Media members are asked to RSVP to PADETSF@uscg.mil or by calling Chief Petty Officer Lauren Steenson at 510-316-4586 by 6 p.m. Monday.

    MIL Security OSI –

  • MIL-OSI Security: MEDIA ADVISORY: Coast Guard Southwest District to hold Change of Command Ceremony

    Source: United States Coast Guard

     

    07/05/2025 12:10 PM EDT

    ALAMEDA, Calif. – Coast Guard Southwest District is scheduled to host a Change of Command Ceremony at Coast Guard Island, Tuesday. Rear Adm. Jeffrey Novak will relieve Rear Adm. Joseph Buzzella, as commander of Coast Guard Southwest District with Vice Adm. Andrew Tiongson, commander, Pacific Area, presiding. WHO: Vice Adm. Andrew Tiongson; Rear Adm. Joseph Buzzella and Rear Adm. Jeffrey Novak WHAT: Coast Guard Southwest District Change of Command Ceremony WHEN: Tuesday, July 8 at 10 a.m. WHERE: Freedom Park on Coast Guard Island Editor’s Note: Media members are asked to RSVP to PADETSF@uscg.mil or by calling Chief Petty Officer Lauren Steenson at 510-316-4586 by 6 p.m. Monday.

    MIL Security OSI –

  • MIL-OSI Security: MEDIA ADVISORY: Coast Guard Southwest District to hold Change of Command Ceremony

    Source: United States Coast Guard

     

    07/05/2025 12:10 PM EDT

    ALAMEDA, Calif. – Coast Guard Southwest District is scheduled to host a Change of Command Ceremony at Coast Guard Island, Tuesday. Rear Adm. Jeffrey Novak will relieve Rear Adm. Joseph Buzzella, as commander of Coast Guard Southwest District with Vice Adm. Andrew Tiongson, commander, Pacific Area, presiding. WHO: Vice Adm. Andrew Tiongson; Rear Adm. Joseph Buzzella and Rear Adm. Jeffrey Novak WHAT: Coast Guard Southwest District Change of Command Ceremony WHEN: Tuesday, July 8 at 10 a.m. WHERE: Freedom Park on Coast Guard Island Editor’s Note: Media members are asked to RSVP to PADETSF@uscg.mil or by calling Chief Petty Officer Lauren Steenson at 510-316-4586 by 6 p.m. Monday.

    MIL Security OSI –

  • MIL-OSI: Where Will Crypto Mining Go Next? PFMCrypto Launches New Mobile Cloud Mining App for Earning Anytime, Anywhere

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Farington, England, July 05, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — With rising interest in alternative ways to grow digital wealth, PFMCrypto is proud to announce the official launch of its mobile cloud mining app, available now for iOS and Android. Designed for accessibility, speed, and security, the app allows users to participate in crypto mining directly from their smartphones—no mining rigs or technical skills required. Supporting BTC, DOGE, ETH and XRP settlements, the app opens multiple paths to passive income in a single streamlined interface. First-time users receive a $10 bonus upon signup, making it easier than ever to begin mining instantly from anywhere in the world.

    Download the new PFMCrypto App today from: https://pfmcrypto.net 

    Cloud Mining, Now in Your Pocket

    For too long, crypto mining has been confined to expensive setups and complex configurations. PFMCrypto changes the landscape with its mobile-first cloud mining app. Users can activate contracts, track daily earnings, and withdraw in BTC, DOGE, ETH or XRP—all from a phone. Whether commuting, relaxing, or traveling, the opportunity to earn digital rewards is now just a tap away.

    By combining real-time mining with flexible payout options, the app is ideal for both casual users and committed investors. Every contract is fully remote, AI-optimized, and secured through enterprise-grade encryption, giving users peace of mind and continuous earning power.

    Key Features of PFMCrypto’s Mobile Cloud Mining App:

    –  Multi-Token Settlements: Withdraw earnings in BTC, DOGE, ETH or XRP—choose the asset that fits personal goals

    –  User-Friendly Interface: Designed for effortless mining management from any mobile device

    –  Instant Contract Activation: Start earning immediately with zero hardware required

    –  Real-Time Tracking: View contract status, returns, and market performance in one dashboard

    –  AI Optimization: Smart algorithms boost mining efficiency—even during low-volatility periods

    Mining Contracts Tailored for Every Lifestyle

    The PFMCrypto app offers a full range of cloud mining contracts suited for various investment levels and time frames. From short-term 1-day plans to long-term 45-day strategies, users can select contracts that align with their earning goals and risk tolerance:

    $10 Contract – 1 Day – Earn $0.66 (Free with signup bonus)

    $100 Contract – 2 Days – Earn $3.00 daily + $2 extra reward

    $500 Contract – 5 Days – Earn $6.15 daily

    $5,000 Contract – 30 Days – Earn $78.50 daily

    $20,000 Contract – 45 Days – Earn $380.00 daily

    Every plan offers daily payouts, with flexible reinvestment options and zero maintenance fees. The $10 bonus makes it easy to get started—without any initial investment.

    Click here to explore more contracts.

    What Makes PFMCrypto’s Mobile Mining App Stand Out?

    –  100% Remote Mining:

    All contracts operate via the cloud and require no physical infrastructure or technical setup. Simply log in, select a plan, and start earning from anywhere.

    –  Principal Guarantee:

    At the end of each contract, the original investment amount is returned in full—protecting capital while maximizing daily rewards.

    –  AI-Enhanced Performance:

    The platform uses proprietary AI systems to analyze market conditions and optimize mining output across supported coins.

    –  Multi-Channel Passive Income:

    With options to receive earnings in 10 major cryptocurrencies, the app empowers users to diversify income streams and manage risk effectively.

    How to Get Started with PFMCrypto’s Mobile App？

    1. Create an Account – Instantly receive a $10 bonus and unlock beginner-friendly mining contracts.
    2. Choose a Plan – Activate a short- or long-term contract with daily payouts.
    3. Start Earning – Watch earnings grow and withdraw in the preferred token.

    Download the app or log in via the website.

    Mining Freedom for a Multi-Coin Future

    Since 2018, PFMCrypto has helped global users generate reliable crypto income without complexity. With this mobile launch, the platform takes another step toward decentralizing opportunity—making mining smarter, more flexible, and more rewarding.

    “With support for multiple coins and the ability to mine on the move, this app brings the next era of cloud mining directly to users’ hands,” said a PFMCrypto spokesperson. “We’ve combined performance, simplicity, and choice—so anyone can earn from the crypto economy, any time.”

    Digital markets may shift—but passive income doesn’t have to. Download the PFMCrypto app today and start mining BTC, DOGE, ETH or XRP with zero hassle.

    Disclaimer: The information provided in this press release does not constitute an investment solicitation, nor does it constitute investment advice, financial advice, or trading recommendations. Cryptocurrency mining and staking involve risks and the possibility of losing funds. It is strongly recommended that you perform due diligence before investing or trading in cryptocurrencies and securities, including consulting a professional financial advisor.

    The MIL Network –

  • MIL-OSI: Where Will Crypto Mining Go Next? PFMCrypto Launches New Mobile Cloud Mining App for Earning Anytime, Anywhere

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Farington, England, July 05, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — With rising interest in alternative ways to grow digital wealth, PFMCrypto is proud to announce the official launch of its mobile cloud mining app, available now for iOS and Android. Designed for accessibility, speed, and security, the app allows users to participate in crypto mining directly from their smartphones—no mining rigs or technical skills required. Supporting BTC, DOGE, ETH and XRP settlements, the app opens multiple paths to passive income in a single streamlined interface. First-time users receive a $10 bonus upon signup, making it easier than ever to begin mining instantly from anywhere in the world.

    Download the new PFMCrypto App today from: https://pfmcrypto.net 

    Cloud Mining, Now in Your Pocket

    For too long, crypto mining has been confined to expensive setups and complex configurations. PFMCrypto changes the landscape with its mobile-first cloud mining app. Users can activate contracts, track daily earnings, and withdraw in BTC, DOGE, ETH or XRP—all from a phone. Whether commuting, relaxing, or traveling, the opportunity to earn digital rewards is now just a tap away.

    By combining real-time mining with flexible payout options, the app is ideal for both casual users and committed investors. Every contract is fully remote, AI-optimized, and secured through enterprise-grade encryption, giving users peace of mind and continuous earning power.

    Key Features of PFMCrypto’s Mobile Cloud Mining App:

    –  Multi-Token Settlements: Withdraw earnings in BTC, DOGE, ETH or XRP—choose the asset that fits personal goals

    –  User-Friendly Interface: Designed for effortless mining management from any mobile device

    –  Instant Contract Activation: Start earning immediately with zero hardware required

    –  Real-Time Tracking: View contract status, returns, and market performance in one dashboard

    –  AI Optimization: Smart algorithms boost mining efficiency—even during low-volatility periods

    Mining Contracts Tailored for Every Lifestyle

    The PFMCrypto app offers a full range of cloud mining contracts suited for various investment levels and time frames. From short-term 1-day plans to long-term 45-day strategies, users can select contracts that align with their earning goals and risk tolerance:

    $10 Contract – 1 Day – Earn $0.66 (Free with signup bonus)

    $100 Contract – 2 Days – Earn $3.00 daily + $2 extra reward

    $500 Contract – 5 Days – Earn $6.15 daily

    $5,000 Contract – 30 Days – Earn $78.50 daily

    $20,000 Contract – 45 Days – Earn $380.00 daily

    Every plan offers daily payouts, with flexible reinvestment options and zero maintenance fees. The $10 bonus makes it easy to get started—without any initial investment.

    Click here to explore more contracts.

    What Makes PFMCrypto’s Mobile Mining App Stand Out?

    –  100% Remote Mining:

    All contracts operate via the cloud and require no physical infrastructure or technical setup. Simply log in, select a plan, and start earning from anywhere.

    –  Principal Guarantee:

    At the end of each contract, the original investment amount is returned in full—protecting capital while maximizing daily rewards.

    –  AI-Enhanced Performance:

    The platform uses proprietary AI systems to analyze market conditions and optimize mining output across supported coins.

    –  Multi-Channel Passive Income:

    With options to receive earnings in 10 major cryptocurrencies, the app empowers users to diversify income streams and manage risk effectively.

    How to Get Started with PFMCrypto’s Mobile App？

    1. Create an Account – Instantly receive a $10 bonus and unlock beginner-friendly mining contracts.
    2. Choose a Plan – Activate a short- or long-term contract with daily payouts.
    3. Start Earning – Watch earnings grow and withdraw in the preferred token.

    Download the app or log in via the website.

    Mining Freedom for a Multi-Coin Future

    Since 2018, PFMCrypto has helped global users generate reliable crypto income without complexity. With this mobile launch, the platform takes another step toward decentralizing opportunity—making mining smarter, more flexible, and more rewarding.

    “With support for multiple coins and the ability to mine on the move, this app brings the next era of cloud mining directly to users’ hands,” said a PFMCrypto spokesperson. “We’ve combined performance, simplicity, and choice—so anyone can earn from the crypto economy, any time.”

    Digital markets may shift—but passive income doesn’t have to. Download the PFMCrypto app today and start mining BTC, DOGE, ETH or XRP with zero hassle.

    Disclaimer: The information provided in this press release does not constitute an investment solicitation, nor does it constitute investment advice, financial advice, or trading recommendations. Cryptocurrency mining and staking involve risks and the possibility of losing funds. It is strongly recommended that you perform due diligence before investing or trading in cryptocurrencies and securities, including consulting a professional financial advisor.

    The MIL Network –