Category: Emissions Trading

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Juvenile estuarine crocodile removed at Biboohra

    Source: Tasmania Police

    Issued: 30 Jun 2025

    Open larger image

    The crocodile was captured in a baited trap.

    Open larger image

    The 1.8m female has been rehomed at a crocodile farm.

    A 1.8m juvenile female estuarine crocodile has been removed from the wild at Biboohra north of Mareeba on the Atherton Tablelands.

    The crocodile was reported to the Department of the Environment, Tourism, Science and Innovation (DETSI) on 11 June 2025.

    Wildlife rangers from the Queensland Parks and Wildlife Service assessed water bodies in the Biboohra area and located the animal in an irrigation channel.

    On 24 June 2025, rangers set a baited trap and the crocodile was captured on 27 June 2025. It has been since been placed in a crocodile farm.

    DETSI would like to thank the Mareeba Shire Council and people in the Mareeba area for their ongoing interest and assistance in crocodile matters, particularly those people who have submitted crocodile sighting reports.

    Sighting reports provide important information about crocodiles, including their location, and wildlife rangers investigate each sighting report.

    The Biboohra area is considered atypical habitat for estuarine crocodiles. All estuarine crocodiles confirmed to be present in that area are targeted for removal from the wild.

    DETSI is aware of community concerns regarding the potential for estuarine crocodiles in the Barron River.

    DETSI has conducted comprehensive surveys of the Barron River over the past ten years and has not observed any estuarine crocodiles, though the river is known to be inhabited by freshwater crocodiles.

    All crocodile sightings should be reported in a timely manner to DETSI via the QWildlife app, making an online crocodile sighting report, or by calling 1300 130 372. Wildlife rangers investigate every crocodile sighting report received.

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI: ESET North America Announces Winners of the Tenth Annual Women in Cybersecurity Scholarship

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    SAN DIEGO and TORONTO, June 30, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — ESET, a global leader in cybersecurity, is proud to announce the winners of its tenth annual Women in Cybersecurity Scholarship. Selected from a highly competitive pool of applicants across the US and Canada, the ten scholarship recipients impressed the review panel with their academic achievements, passion for cybersecurity, and commitment to making a positive impact in STEM fields.

    This year marks a milestone in the program’s evolution with the continued expansion of the Cybersecurity Trailblazer Award Tier, a designation reserved for the most exceptional applicants who have demonstrated outstanding technical proficiency, leadership, and a deep, sustained focus on cybersecurity. The recipients of this year’s Cybersecurity Trailblazer Awards are U.S.’ Alexis Eskenazi, Crystal Yang, and Ismat Jarin, each receiving a $10,000 scholarship in recognition of their exemplary work. The Canadian Trailblazer recipients are Azka Siddiqui and Constance Prevot, each receiving a $5,000 scholarship for their remarkable contributions and potential to drive change within the field.

    This year, Canada also saw the launch of the Future Leader Award, a new scholarship tier recognizing emerging talent with strong potential in the field of cybersecurity. Five students were selected to receive $1,000 scholarships: Yushika Jhundoo, Meadow Agbor, Tina Ismail, Vrinda Joshi, and Yashvi Shah. Together, these individuals have shown exceptional promise as future leaders in cybersecurity. Their ambitions and achievements reflect the values at the heart of the Women in Cybersecurity Scholarship: innovation, inclusion, and impact.

    “This scholarship has always been deeply personal to us at ESET,” said Celeste Blodgett, Vice President of Human Resources at ESET North America. “As we celebrate its tenth year, I’m incredibly proud to recognize this group of brilliant and driven women. With so many outstanding applicants this year, selecting the final recipients was no easy task. What set these winners apart was not only their technical excellence, but also their drive to lead and create meaningful change. They represent the future of cybersecurity, and we’re honored to support them on their journey.”

    ESET North America awarded $45,000 in scholarships this year to celebrate the program’s tenth anniversary, reaffirming its commitment to building a more inclusive and secure digital future.

    Learn more about the Trailblazer Award recipients:

    Alexis Eskenazi, Berkeley, California, United States: Alexis Eskenazi’s journey into cybersecurity began with competitive robotics, where building championship-level robots sparked her interest in how connected systems function. That passion led her to launch Eskenazi Ed-Tech & AI Consulting, bringing hands-on STEM education to over 400 students globally. From mentoring the world’s first all-female Indigenous robotics team in New Zealand to researching vulnerabilities in U.S. healthcare and semiconductor infrastructure, Alexis blends technical insight with education and policy to advance a more secure, inclusive digital world.

    “Through work in technology, policy, and education, I’ve learned how to navigate complexity, and through community engagement, how to make that knowledge actionable,” said Alexis. “The ESET Women in Cybersecurity Scholarship represents critical support for my continued integration of technical, educational, and policy-driven cybersecurity work.”

    Crystal Yang, Katy, Texas, United States: Crystal Yang’s interest in cybersecurity was sparked by watching scam-baiting videos, which seem humorous on the surface, but reveal just how vulnerable people can be to social engineering. Determined to fight back, she built TimeWaster3000, an AI-powered bot that wastes scammers’ time using natural language processing and speech recognition. As the founder of Audemy.org, Crystal has also created AI-driven educational games used by more than 5,000 blind and visually impaired students worldwide and implemented in 19 schools. Today, she is focused on cybersecurity projects aimed at scam awareness and social engineering defense for businesses.

    “Cybersecurity isn’t just about protecting data,” said Crystal. “It’s about protecting people. Winning this scholarship helps me build tech that defends not just with firewalls, but with empathy, creativity, and humor.”

    Ismat Jarin, Irvine, California, United States: Ismat Jarin’s path to cybersecurity began in her home country, where early experiences with societal biases and privacy violations fueled her resolve to protect underrepresented communities through technology. She became the first woman from her town to rank in the top 2% nationally for admission to her country’s top engineering university, later earning a Master’s in Systems and Security from UM Dearborn and now pursuing a Ph.D. at UC Irvine. Her research explores privacy risks in AI/LLMs and emerging technologies and has been published at leading conferences like PETS, NeurIPS(WiML) and CODASPY. Beyond research, Ismat is a passionate mentor and advocate, helping first-generation and underrepresented students find belonging and success in cybersecurity.

    “For women from restrictive backgrounds like mine, it’s not just about breaking barriers,” said Ismat. “It’s about paving new paths so others can thrive. Ultimately, my contributions will help create a more inclusive and innovative cybersecurity landscape, where every individual can thrive.”

    Azka Siddiqui, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada: Azka Siddiqui’s passion for computer science began in fourth grade when she programmed Dash robots during a classroom activity, sparking her fascination with the intersection of hardware and software. Her interest in cybersecurity solidified during a 2024 internship at Nokia, where she helped refine an advanced filter tool that monitored over 10,000 alarms. In addition to furthering her technical skills, Azka serves as Vice Chair of a national nonprofit empowering girls in STEM, has led a coding club spanning three Canadian provinces, and conducted research on smart-grid anomaly detection and eye-tracking technologies in university labs. This fall, Azka will begin her Honours Bachelor of Applied Science in Computer Engineering at the University of Waterloo, where she plans to focus on cybersecurity and AI with an emphasis on making digital spaces safer for women.

    “As a young woman of color in tech, I’ve often felt like I had to work twice as hard just to be seen. Winning the ESET Women in Cybersecurity Scholarship reminds me that I do belong — not just in this field, but at the forefront of it. With ESET’s support, I’m committed to not only advancing my own journey in building ethical and secure technologies but also to challenging the barriers that keep others, especially women, from stepping into these spaces.”

    Constance Prevot, Mount Royal, Quebec, Canada: Constance Prevot’s journey into cybersecurity began at Concordia University, where a Capture-The-Flag competition sparked a passion that would shape her academic and professional path. She has since represented Canada at the 2024 International Cybersecurity Competition in Chile, served as a SOC Analyst at OnePoint for Desjardins, conducted adversary-focused research at GoSecure, and co-presented her findings at conferences including HOPE and BSides. As President of Concordia University’s Software Engineering and Computer Science Society, she has led initiatives to make cybersecurity education more accessible, including launching “compétitionsquebec,” a platform cataloging local competitions and training resources.

    “I believe in creating environments where individuals from all backgrounds can thrive and contribute their unique perspectives,” said Constance. “By continuing to bridge research, practice, education, and community engagement, I hope to help build a more secure and inclusive cybersecurity ecosystem.”

    Future Leader Awards: This inaugural award proudly recognizes five exceptional students who exemplify the next generation of innovators and changemakers. With a $1,000 award, these students are being honored not only for their academic excellence but also for their passion and potential to shape the future of technology. This year’s awardees are:

    • Yushika Jhundoo (Ottawa, ON) – Computer Science, University of Ottawa: Tech community builder and cybersecurity enthusiast dedicated to inclusive outreach and digital empowerment.
    • Meadow Agbor (Calgary, AB) – Computer Information Systems, Mount Royal University (MRU): Cybersecurity intern and youth mentor with a passion for digital safety and inclusive community engagement.
    • Tina Ismail (Mississauga, ON) – Electrical Engineering, McMaster University: Cybersecurity enthusiast and IEEE leader blending technical innovation, educational research, and creative expression.
    • Vrinda Joshi (Markham, ON) – Systems Design Engineering (Co-op), University of Waterloo: STEM equity advocate and nonprofit co-founder empowering youth through coding, robotics, and hands-on innovation.
    • Yashvi Shah (Caledon, ON) – Computer Engineering (Co-op), University of Toronto: Innovative researcher and tech educator with experience in AI, 3D simulation, and youth empowerment through coding and wellness initiatives.

    Blodgett adds, “ESET extends heartfelt congratulations to all of this year’s winners. Their drive, curiosity, and commitment to cybersecurity exemplify the very best of what the next generation has to offer. As ESET looks ahead to the future, the company remains dedicated to supporting women in cybersecurity and building a more inclusive and secure digital world for all.”

    Learn more about the Women in Cybersecurity Scholarship here.

    About ESET

    ESET® provides cutting-edge digital security to prevent attacks before they happen. By combining the power of AI and human expertise, ESET stays ahead of emerging global cyberthreats, both known and unknown— securing businesses, critical infrastructure, and individuals. Whether it’s endpoint, cloud, or mobile protection, our AI-native, cloud-first solutions and services remain highly effective and easy to use. ESET technology includes robust detection and response, ultra-secure encryption, and multifactor authentication. With 24/7 real-time defense and strong local support, we keep users safe and businesses running without interruption. The ever-evolving digital landscape demands a progressive approach to security: ESET is committed to world-class research and powerful threat intelligence, backed by R&D centers and a strong global partner network. For more information, visit www.eset.com or follow our social media, podcasts and blogs.

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI Security: Las Vegas Jury Convicts Woman for Threats Against Two Federal Judges and Her Probation Officer; San Diego Trial Team Prosecuted the Case in the District of Nevada

    Source: US FBI

    LAS VEGAS – A federal jury has convicted Latonia Smith of cyberstalking and threatening two district court judges and a probation officer, all of whom were involved in her previous federal conviction for death threats she made against lawyers in yet another case.

    In the current case, after a six-day trial and less than one day of deliberation, a jury found that Smith threatened U.S. District Judge Richard Franklin Boulware, who presided over Smith’s 2021 trial and sentenced her to 36 months in prison for that offense. The jury also found that Smith targeted U.S. District Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey, who presided over the defendant’s supervised release, and Shawn Mummey, her probation officer.

    At the time of the grand jury’s indictment in the current matter, Smith was on supervised release from that previous federal 2021 conviction. In that case, Smith targeted corporate lawyers involved in defending the 2017 firing of her mother from her job as a guest room attendant at the Planet Hollywood Hotel and Casino in Las Vegas after she allegedly took a small amount of money from a guest’s room.

    “All of these victims felt threatened and emotionally distressed. They then took steps to protect themselves and their families,” said U.S. Attorney Adam Gordon for the Southern District of California. “Threats directed at members of the judiciary are not only criminal acts, but direct attacks on the rule of law. Intimidation of judges and court personnel erodes public trust and threatens the fair administration of justice for all.”

    “The FBI takes threats of violence very seriously and works diligently to protect the communities we serve,” said Rafik Mattar, Acting Special Agent in Charge of the FBI in Las Vegas, “We will not tolerate threats of violence to any member of our community, particularly those dedicated to safeguarding our democratic process. The defendant’s actions were dangerous and unacceptable. We will continue to work with our law enforcement partners to disrupt and investigate those who engage in violent rhetoric—ensuring accountability for anyone who threatens to harass, intimidate, or harm others.”

    When Smith was released from federal prison in the first case against her, she was sent to Washoe County jail to face allegations related to an October 31, 2019, armed home-invasion in Reno she allegedly committed against another lawyer involved in the Planet Hollywood case.

    Smith was granted bail in early June 2022. Upon her return to Las Vegas, Smith immediately began searching Google for information about Judge Boulware along with his wife, Las Vegas City Councilwoman Nancy Brune, and their family. At the same time, she googled “judges should die.”

    Over the next several weeks, the defendant became increasingly frustrated with judges and anyone involved with her prior federal case. On June 23, 2022, the defendant emailed her probation officer and explained, “Some good advice: Life is short, society should be careful who they piss off.” Below the warning, the defendant sent a link to a YouTube video showing a six-minute compilation of cell phone videos from the October 1 mass shooting at the Mandalay Bay Hotel.

    Over the next few days, Smith sent a series of emails. Some threatened a mass casualty event: “LET THE SHOW BEGIN. NEVADA IS GOING TO LOVE THIS!!!!”  Some were designed to let victims know their loved ones were in jeopardy: “LETS KEEP [YOUR KIDS] IN FOCUS”.

    Throughout many of the emails, the defendant made it clear that she had deeply researched the recipients of her threats, accurately identifying where they could be found, either during hobby activities, or in their actual homes. For example, to Judge Jennifer Dorsey the defendant wrote: “Tell Jennifer, Henderson is nice I see why she chose that area. Lots of shops nearby. Smart.” At trial, Judge Dorsey testified that the defendant’s identification of her personal residence inspired her to immediately sell her home and move.

    The victims of Smith’s threats testified at trial they were frightened and believed Smith was capable of violently acting on her threats as she had allegedly done in the pending case regarding the armed home invasion targeting the lawyer in Reno.

    U.S. District Judge Gloria Navarro reported Smith’s threats to U.S. Marshals, who protect the federal judiciary. Judge Navarro testified at the trial, telling the jury that she recognized the danger posed by the defendant and immediately took action.  “I emailed the chief of probation; anybody I could get a hold of to prevent a tragedy…I didn’t want to die. I didn’t want my family to die.  I didn’t want my coworkers to die.” The Marshals then contacted the FBI.

    After two special agents from the FBI interviewed the Smith on June 27, 2022, she was immediately taken into custody, where she has remained. During the interview, when asked what she was thinking about when she was researching mass shooters, Smith responded: “I think what they were thinking.”

    The investigation found that Smith, who has a biochemistry degree from the University of Nevada Las Vegas, Googled phrases like “judges die,” “how to become a bomb maker,” “how to be a mass shooter,” “buying a gun,” and “ar 15 for sale.” She also watched the compilation of videos from the October 1 mass shooting 13 times over a three-week period.  At the same time, the defendant repeatedly searched the names of her targets, some of their children, and some of their home addresses. The jury deliberated for less than a day before returning a guilty verdict on three counts of cyberstalking for the emails sent to Judges Dorsey and Boulware, along with her probation officer. The jury acquitted the defendant on the other two counts of cyberstalking.

    The defendant will remain in custody pending sentencing, on a date yet to be determined.

    The trial took place in the federal courthouse in Las Vegas. The presiding judge was Senior District Court Judge Michael W. Mosman, from the District of Oregon. Judge Mosman was appointed to preside over the case by special designation of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.

    Smith’s prosecution was initiated by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Nevada, out of their office in Reno.  In March 2024, the Department of Justice recused the entire U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Nevada and had the prosecution reassigned.

    This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorneys Andrew Haden and Francisco Nagel for the Southern District of California, both of whom were named Special Assistant U.S. Attorneys in Las Vegas after the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Nevada was recused.

    DEFENDANT                                                Case Number 22CR051-MWM                              

    Latonia Dyshawna Smith                               Age: 31                       Las Vegas, NV

    SUMMARY OF CHARGES

    Three Counts of Cyberstalking – Title 18, U.S.C., Sections 2261A

    Maximum penalty: Five years in prison, as to each count of conviction

    INVESTIGATING AGENCIES

    Federal Bureau of Investigation

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI USA: US Department of Labor awards more than $23M in new grants to help homeless, at-risk veterans reenter workforce

    Source: US Department of Labor

    Categories24/7 OSI, labor, MIL-OSI, United States Government, US Bureau of Labor Statistics, US Department of Labor

    Alethieia House Inc.

    Birmingham

    AL

    AL: Autauga, Bullock, Elmore, Lowndes, Montgomery

    $358,996

    Teens Empowerment Awareness with Resolutions Inc.

    Tuskegee

    AL

    AL: Macon, Lee, Russell

    $300,000

    St. Francis House Inc.

    Little Rock

    AR

    AR: Pulaski

    $183,965

    Valley of the Sun Young Men’s Christian Association

    Phoenix

    AZ

    AZ: Maricopa

    $500,000

    United States Veterans Initiative

    Prescott

    AZ

    AZ: Yavapai

    $320,000

    WestCare California Inc.

    Fresno

    CA

    CA: San Joaquin

    $300,000

    WestCare California Inc.

    Fresno

    CA

    CA: Fresno, Madera

    $400,000

    Emmanuel’s House Inc.

    Hesperia

    CA

    CA: San Bernardino, Riverside 

    $500,000

    United States Veterans Initiative

    Inglewood

    CA

    CA: Los Angeles

    $240,000

    Managed Career Solutions Spc.

    Los Angeles

    CA

    CA: Los Angeles, Santa Barbara, Ventura

    $500,000

    Volunteers of America of Los Angeles

    Los Angeles

    CA

    CA: Los Angeles

    $500,000

    Vocational Rehabilitation Specialists Inc. 

    Marina

    CA

    CA: Monterey, Santa Cruz, San Benito

    $336,000

    Vocational Rehabilitation Specialists Inc. 

    Marina

    CA

    CA: Fresno, Madera

    $396,000

    Vocational Rehabilitation Specialists Inc. 

    Marina

    CA

    CA: Amador, San Joaquin, Calaveras, Stanislaus

    $440,000

    Vocational Rehabilitation Specialists Inc. 

    Marina

    CA

    FL: Hillsborough, Polk, Hardee

    $400,000

    Vocational Rehabilitation Specialists Inc. 

    Marina

    CA

    CA: Santa Barbara, San Luis Obispo, Ventura

    $408,000

    Vocational Rehabilitation Specialists Inc. 

    Marina

    CA

    WA: Island, Jefferson, King, Kitsap, Mason, Pierce, Thurston

    $499,999

    Vocational Rehabilitation Specialists Inc. 

    Marina

    CA

    FL: Orange, Osceola, Seminole, Brevard

    $500,000

    Vocational Rehabilitation Specialists Inc. 

    Marina

    CA

    FL: Pinellas, Manatee, Sarasota

    $392,000

    Vocational Rehabilitation Specialists Inc. 

    Marina

    CA

    MN: Benton, Carlton, Lake, Mille Lacs, Morrison, Sherburne, St. Louis, Stearns, Todd, Wright

    WI: Barron, Buffalo, Chippewa, 
    Clark, Crawford, Douglas, Dunn, Eau Claire, Jackson, La Crosse, Monroe, Pepin, Pierce, Polk, Rusk, St. Croix, Trempealeau, Vernon

    $304,000

    Vocational Rehabilitation Specialists Inc. 

    Marina

    CA

    WI: Columbia, Dane, Dodge, Green, Iowa, Jefferson, Lafayette, Rock, Sauk

    $320,000

    Vocational Rehabilitation Specialists Inc. 

    Marina

    CA

    NC: Bladen, Brunswick, Chatham, Columbus, Cumberland, Duplin, Harnett, Hoke, Johnston, Lee, Moore, New Hanover, Onslow, Pender, Richmond, Robeson, Sampson, Scotland

    $496,000

    Vocational Rehabilitation Specialists Inc. 

    Marina

    CA

    NE: Burt, Cass, Dodge, Douglas, Lancaster, Otoe, Sarpy, Saunders, Washington

    $272,000

    The Salvation Army

    Rancho Palos Verdes

    CA

    CA: Los Angeles, Ventura, Santa Barbara

    $500,000

    The Salvation Army

    Rancho Palos Verdes

    CA

    CA: Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino

    $500,000

    Vietnam Veterans of San Diego

    San Diego

    CA

    CA: Imperial

    $237,070

    Goodwill Of Silicon Valley

    San Jose

    CA

    CA: Santa Clara

    $500,000

    Goodwill Industries of Orange County California

    Santa Ana

    CA

    CA: Orange

    $240,000

    The Arapahoe/Douglas Workforce Development Board

    Centennial

    CO

    CO: Arapahoe, Douglas

    $165,000

    Volunteers of America Colorado

    Denver

    CO

    CO: Adams, Arapahoe, Broomfield, Boulder, Denver, Douglas, Jefferson

    $445,473

    Goodwill of Western and Northern Connecticut, Inc.

    Bridgeport

    CT

    CT: Fairfield

    $260,000

    PowerTechs Incorporated

    Wilmington

    DE

    TN: Davidson

    $483,112

    Abilities Inc. of Florida

    Clearwater

    FL

    FL: Pinellas

    $300,000

    Salt Outreach, Inc.

    Orlando

    FL

    FL: Orange, Osceola, Seminole

    $350,000

    Atlanta Center for Self Sufficiency, Inc.

    Atlanta

    GA

    GA: Clayton, Cobb, DeKalb, Fulton, Gwinnett

    $475,000

    Get to Work Foundation Inc.

    Villa Rica

    GA

    NC:  Iredell, Mecklenburg, Union, Rowan, Cabarrus

    $500,000

    Get to Work Foundation Inc.

    Villa Rica

    GA

    GA: Clayton, Cobb, DeKalb, Douglas, Fulton, Gwinnett, Henry, Rockdale

    $500,000

    Workforce Alliance of South Central Kansas

    Wichita

    KS

    KS: Sedgwick

    $500,000

    Vietnam Veterans Workshop Inc.

    Boston

    MA

    MA: Bristol, Essex, Middlesex, Norfolk, Plymouth, Suffolk

    $500,000

    AMVETS National Service Foundation

    Hyattsville

    MD

    AZ: Maricopa

    $500,000

    AMVETS National Service Foundation

    Hyattsville

    MD

    UT: Salt Lake

    $500,000

    Southwest Economic Solutions Corporation

    Detroit

    MI

    MI: Wayne

    $160,000

    Volunteers of America Michigan Inc.

    Southfield

    MI

    MI: Allegan, Calhoun, Kalamazoo, Kent, Muskegon, Ottawa

    $256,761

    Connections to Success Inc.

    St. Charles

    MO

    MO: Boone

    $152,000

    Harbor Homes Inc.

    Nashua

    NH

    NH: Belknap, Carroll, Cheshire, Coos, Grafton, Hillsborough, Merrimack, Rockingham, Strafford, Sullivan

    $200,000

    Center For Family Services Inc.

    Camden

    NJ

    NJ: Camden

    $220,000

    WestCare Nevada Inc.

    Reno

    NV

    NV: Washoe 

    $500,000

    Black Veterans for Social Justice Inc.

    Brooklyn

    NY

    NY: Bronx, New York, Westchester

    $500,000

    Services for the UnderServed Inc.

    New York

    NY

    NY:  Bronx, Kings, Queens, Richmond, New York

    $178,459

    Volunteers of America Ohio & Indiana

    Columbus

    OH

    IN: Lake, Jasper, La Porte

    $290,240

    Easter Seals Oregon

    Portland

    OR

    OR: Jackson, Josephine

    $300,000

    Easter Seals Oregon

    Portland

    OR

    OR: Crook, Deschutes

    $320,000

    Veterans Multi-Service Center Inc.

    Philadelphia

    PA

    PA: Centre, Clinton. Dauphin, Franklin, Fulton, Juniata, Lebanon, Mifflin, Northumberland, Snyder, Union

    $278,632

    America Works of Tennessee Inc.

    Memphis

    TN

    TN: Shelby, Jackson
    AR: Crittenden

    $360,000

    Volunteers of America Texas Inc.

    Euless

    TX

    TX: Dallas, Tarrant

    $500,000

    SER-Jobs for Progress of the Texas Gulf Coast Inc.

    Houston

    TX

    TX: Fort Bend, Harris, Montgomery

    $312,000

    American GI Forum National Veterans Outreach Program Inc.

    San Antonio

    TX

    TX: Bexar

    $500,000

    Family Endeavors Inc., dba Endeavors

    San Antonio

    TX

    AZ: Cochise

    $399,999

    River City Comprehensive Counseling Services

    Henrico

    VA

    VA: Richmond city

    $405,516

    United States Veterans Initiative

    Richmond

    VA

    DC: District of Columbia
    MD: Montgomery

    $260,000

    Opportunities Industrialization Center of Washington

    Yakima

    WA

    WA: Adams, Benton, Chelan, Douglas, Franklin, Grant, Kittitas, Walla Walla, Yakima

    $500,000

    Eastern West Virginia Community Action Agency Inc.

    Petersburg

    WV

    WV: Barbour, Berkeley, Braxton, Brooke, Calhoun, Doddridge, Gilmer, Grant, Greenbrier, Hampshire, Hancock, Hardy, Harrison, Jefferson, Lewis, Marion, Marshall, Mineral, Monongalia, Monroe, Morgan, Ohio, Pendleton, Pleasants, Pocahontas, Preston, Randolph, Ritchie, Taylor, Tucker, Tyler, Upshur, Webster, Wetzel, Wirt, Wood

    $500,000

    Volunteers Of America Northern Rockies

    Sheridan

    WY

    MT: Custer, Dawson, Prairie, Rosebud, Treasure, Wibaux, Yellowstone

    $200,000

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: US Department of Labor awards more than $23M in new grants to help homeless, at-risk veterans reenter workforce

    Source: US Department of Labor

    Categories24/7 OSI, labor, MIL-OSI, United States Government, US Bureau of Labor Statistics, US Department of Labor

    Alethieia House Inc.

    Birmingham

    AL

    AL: Autauga, Bullock, Elmore, Lowndes, Montgomery

    $358,996

    Teens Empowerment Awareness with Resolutions Inc.

    Tuskegee

    AL

    AL: Macon, Lee, Russell

    $300,000

    St. Francis House Inc.

    Little Rock

    AR

    AR: Pulaski

    $183,965

    Valley of the Sun Young Men’s Christian Association

    Phoenix

    AZ

    AZ: Maricopa

    $500,000

    United States Veterans Initiative

    Prescott

    AZ

    AZ: Yavapai

    $320,000

    WestCare California Inc.

    Fresno

    CA

    CA: San Joaquin

    $300,000

    WestCare California Inc.

    Fresno

    CA

    CA: Fresno, Madera

    $400,000

    Emmanuel’s House Inc.

    Hesperia

    CA

    CA: San Bernardino, Riverside 

    $500,000

    United States Veterans Initiative

    Inglewood

    CA

    CA: Los Angeles

    $240,000

    Managed Career Solutions Spc.

    Los Angeles

    CA

    CA: Los Angeles, Santa Barbara, Ventura

    $500,000

    Volunteers of America of Los Angeles

    Los Angeles

    CA

    CA: Los Angeles

    $500,000

    Vocational Rehabilitation Specialists Inc. 

    Marina

    CA

    CA: Monterey, Santa Cruz, San Benito

    $336,000

    Vocational Rehabilitation Specialists Inc. 

    Marina

    CA

    CA: Fresno, Madera

    $396,000

    Vocational Rehabilitation Specialists Inc. 

    Marina

    CA

    CA: Amador, San Joaquin, Calaveras, Stanislaus

    $440,000

    Vocational Rehabilitation Specialists Inc. 

    Marina

    CA

    FL: Hillsborough, Polk, Hardee

    $400,000

    Vocational Rehabilitation Specialists Inc. 

    Marina

    CA

    CA: Santa Barbara, San Luis Obispo, Ventura

    $408,000

    Vocational Rehabilitation Specialists Inc. 

    Marina

    CA

    WA: Island, Jefferson, King, Kitsap, Mason, Pierce, Thurston

    $499,999

    Vocational Rehabilitation Specialists Inc. 

    Marina

    CA

    FL: Orange, Osceola, Seminole, Brevard

    $500,000

    Vocational Rehabilitation Specialists Inc. 

    Marina

    CA

    FL: Pinellas, Manatee, Sarasota

    $392,000

    Vocational Rehabilitation Specialists Inc. 

    Marina

    CA

    MN: Benton, Carlton, Lake, Mille Lacs, Morrison, Sherburne, St. Louis, Stearns, Todd, Wright

    WI: Barron, Buffalo, Chippewa, 
    Clark, Crawford, Douglas, Dunn, Eau Claire, Jackson, La Crosse, Monroe, Pepin, Pierce, Polk, Rusk, St. Croix, Trempealeau, Vernon

    $304,000

    Vocational Rehabilitation Specialists Inc. 

    Marina

    CA

    WI: Columbia, Dane, Dodge, Green, Iowa, Jefferson, Lafayette, Rock, Sauk

    $320,000

    Vocational Rehabilitation Specialists Inc. 

    Marina

    CA

    NC: Bladen, Brunswick, Chatham, Columbus, Cumberland, Duplin, Harnett, Hoke, Johnston, Lee, Moore, New Hanover, Onslow, Pender, Richmond, Robeson, Sampson, Scotland

    $496,000

    Vocational Rehabilitation Specialists Inc. 

    Marina

    CA

    NE: Burt, Cass, Dodge, Douglas, Lancaster, Otoe, Sarpy, Saunders, Washington

    $272,000

    The Salvation Army

    Rancho Palos Verdes

    CA

    CA: Los Angeles, Ventura, Santa Barbara

    $500,000

    The Salvation Army

    Rancho Palos Verdes

    CA

    CA: Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino

    $500,000

    Vietnam Veterans of San Diego

    San Diego

    CA

    CA: Imperial

    $237,070

    Goodwill Of Silicon Valley

    San Jose

    CA

    CA: Santa Clara

    $500,000

    Goodwill Industries of Orange County California

    Santa Ana

    CA

    CA: Orange

    $240,000

    The Arapahoe/Douglas Workforce Development Board

    Centennial

    CO

    CO: Arapahoe, Douglas

    $165,000

    Volunteers of America Colorado

    Denver

    CO

    CO: Adams, Arapahoe, Broomfield, Boulder, Denver, Douglas, Jefferson

    $445,473

    Goodwill of Western and Northern Connecticut, Inc.

    Bridgeport

    CT

    CT: Fairfield

    $260,000

    PowerTechs Incorporated

    Wilmington

    DE

    TN: Davidson

    $483,112

    Abilities Inc. of Florida

    Clearwater

    FL

    FL: Pinellas

    $300,000

    Salt Outreach, Inc.

    Orlando

    FL

    FL: Orange, Osceola, Seminole

    $350,000

    Atlanta Center for Self Sufficiency, Inc.

    Atlanta

    GA

    GA: Clayton, Cobb, DeKalb, Fulton, Gwinnett

    $475,000

    Get to Work Foundation Inc.

    Villa Rica

    GA

    NC:  Iredell, Mecklenburg, Union, Rowan, Cabarrus

    $500,000

    Get to Work Foundation Inc.

    Villa Rica

    GA

    GA: Clayton, Cobb, DeKalb, Douglas, Fulton, Gwinnett, Henry, Rockdale

    $500,000

    Workforce Alliance of South Central Kansas

    Wichita

    KS

    KS: Sedgwick

    $500,000

    Vietnam Veterans Workshop Inc.

    Boston

    MA

    MA: Bristol, Essex, Middlesex, Norfolk, Plymouth, Suffolk

    $500,000

    AMVETS National Service Foundation

    Hyattsville

    MD

    AZ: Maricopa

    $500,000

    AMVETS National Service Foundation

    Hyattsville

    MD

    UT: Salt Lake

    $500,000

    Southwest Economic Solutions Corporation

    Detroit

    MI

    MI: Wayne

    $160,000

    Volunteers of America Michigan Inc.

    Southfield

    MI

    MI: Allegan, Calhoun, Kalamazoo, Kent, Muskegon, Ottawa

    $256,761

    Connections to Success Inc.

    St. Charles

    MO

    MO: Boone

    $152,000

    Harbor Homes Inc.

    Nashua

    NH

    NH: Belknap, Carroll, Cheshire, Coos, Grafton, Hillsborough, Merrimack, Rockingham, Strafford, Sullivan

    $200,000

    Center For Family Services Inc.

    Camden

    NJ

    NJ: Camden

    $220,000

    WestCare Nevada Inc.

    Reno

    NV

    NV: Washoe 

    $500,000

    Black Veterans for Social Justice Inc.

    Brooklyn

    NY

    NY: Bronx, New York, Westchester

    $500,000

    Services for the UnderServed Inc.

    New York

    NY

    NY:  Bronx, Kings, Queens, Richmond, New York

    $178,459

    Volunteers of America Ohio & Indiana

    Columbus

    OH

    IN: Lake, Jasper, La Porte

    $290,240

    Easter Seals Oregon

    Portland

    OR

    OR: Jackson, Josephine

    $300,000

    Easter Seals Oregon

    Portland

    OR

    OR: Crook, Deschutes

    $320,000

    Veterans Multi-Service Center Inc.

    Philadelphia

    PA

    PA: Centre, Clinton. Dauphin, Franklin, Fulton, Juniata, Lebanon, Mifflin, Northumberland, Snyder, Union

    $278,632

    America Works of Tennessee Inc.

    Memphis

    TN

    TN: Shelby, Jackson
    AR: Crittenden

    $360,000

    Volunteers of America Texas Inc.

    Euless

    TX

    TX: Dallas, Tarrant

    $500,000

    SER-Jobs for Progress of the Texas Gulf Coast Inc.

    Houston

    TX

    TX: Fort Bend, Harris, Montgomery

    $312,000

    American GI Forum National Veterans Outreach Program Inc.

    San Antonio

    TX

    TX: Bexar

    $500,000

    Family Endeavors Inc., dba Endeavors

    San Antonio

    TX

    AZ: Cochise

    $399,999

    River City Comprehensive Counseling Services

    Henrico

    VA

    VA: Richmond city

    $405,516

    United States Veterans Initiative

    Richmond

    VA

    DC: District of Columbia
    MD: Montgomery

    $260,000

    Opportunities Industrialization Center of Washington

    Yakima

    WA

    WA: Adams, Benton, Chelan, Douglas, Franklin, Grant, Kittitas, Walla Walla, Yakima

    $500,000

    Eastern West Virginia Community Action Agency Inc.

    Petersburg

    WV

    WV: Barbour, Berkeley, Braxton, Brooke, Calhoun, Doddridge, Gilmer, Grant, Greenbrier, Hampshire, Hancock, Hardy, Harrison, Jefferson, Lewis, Marion, Marshall, Mineral, Monongalia, Monroe, Morgan, Ohio, Pendleton, Pleasants, Pocahontas, Preston, Randolph, Ritchie, Taylor, Tucker, Tyler, Upshur, Webster, Wetzel, Wirt, Wood

    $500,000

    Volunteers Of America Northern Rockies

    Sheridan

    WY

    MT: Custer, Dawson, Prairie, Rosebud, Treasure, Wibaux, Yellowstone

    $200,000

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Economics: Scheduled Banks’ Statement of Position in India as on Friday, June 13, 2025

    Source: Reserve Bank of India

    (Amount in ₹ crore)
      SCHEDULED COMMERCIAL BANKS
    (Including RRBs, SFBs and PBs)
    ALL SCHEDULED BANKS
    14-Jun-2024 30-May-2025* 13-Jun-2025* 14-Jun-2024 30-May-2025* 13-Jun-2025*
    I LIABILITIES TO THE BKG.SYSTEM (A)            
      a) Demand & Time deposits from banks 273308.16 365140.08 340603.24 277097.38 370999.12 346319.8749**
      b) Borrowings from banks 152185.60 110552.25 109671.80 152187.60 110574.25 109889.53
      c) Other demand & time liabilities 76032.19 25071.47 23927.34 76298.36 25465.93 24362.82
    II LIABILITIES TO OTHERS (A)            
      a) Deposits (other than from banks) 20902918.17 23172542.62 23069772.55 21358407.93 23662773.91 23561872.69
      i) Demand 2390694.11 2988920.70 2859239.01 2440672.19 3038379.44 2908818.31
      ii) Time 18512224.06 20183621.92 20210533.54 18917735.75 20624394.47 20653054.38
      b) Borrowings @ 780674.69 895727.00 837462.68 785083.63 900193.89 841977.70
      c) Other demand & time liabilities 965607.06 1034573.60 1106232.23 978521.91 1047707.96 1120178.02
    III BORROWINGS FROM R.B.I. (B) 111102.00 6516.00 2248.00 111102.00 6516.00 2248.00
      Against usance bills and / or prom. Notes            
    IV CASH 85283.14 87179.07 90471.61 87674.97 89604.92 93073.93
    V BALANCES WITH R.B.I. (B) 983708.00 956086.24 932453.46 1003434.00 975236.91 951630.59
    VI ASSETS WITH BANKING SYSTEM            
      a) Balances with other banks            
      i) In current accounts 7664.17 11434.59 10498.68 10483.91 13853.23 12729.59
      ii) In other accounts 178513.58 255330.58 244036.86 224431.26 318135.43 308394.18
      b) Money at call & short notice 11390.08 22812.64 21743.92 25192.27 40349.51 37684.89
      c) Advances to banks (i.e. due from bks.) 52270.19 36147.80 31496.42 54389.85 38542.46 33717.34£
      d) Other assets 107937.02 78091.66 65849.37 110591.29 82799.25 71109.15
    VII INVESTMENTS (At book value) 6231385.82 6706717.24 6691443.60 6384112.72 6861687.28 6877810.85
      a) Central & State Govt. securities+ 6230374.06 6706168.85 6690874.45 6376135.84 6853140.23 6869498.86
      b) Other approved securities 1011.77 548.39 569.14 7976.88 8547.05 8311.99
    VIII BANK CREDIT (Excluding Inter-Bank Advances) 16706417.54 18287376.91 18313977.69 17143118.18 18753740.95 18783780.83
      a) Loans, cash credits & Overdrafts $ 16392988.28 17949958.34 17976567.95 16826405.29 18412982.24 18443143.24
      b) Inland Bills purchased 64052.90 79467.07 78124.27 65383.33 80743.89 79300.44
      c) Inland Bills discounted 208278.98 222449.12 223752.50 209565.71 223956.61 225217.50
      d) Foreign Bills purchased 16140.00 13866.49 13510.87 16370.65 14063.24 13738.06
      e) Foreign Bills discounted 24957.38 21635.89 22022.09 25393.21 21994.97 22381.60
    NOTE
    * Provisional figures incorporated in respect of such banks as have not been able to submit final figures.
    (A) Demand and Time Liabilities do not include borrowings of any Scheduled State Co-operative Bank from State Government and any reserve fund deposits maintained with such banks by any co-operative society within the areas of operation of such banks.
    ** This excludes deposits of Co-operative Banks with Scheduled State Co-operative Banks. These are included under item II (a).
    @ Other than from Reserve Bank, National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development and Export Import Bank of India.
    (B) The figures relating to Scheduled Commercial Banks’ Borrowings in India from Reserve Bank and balances with Reserve Bank are those shown in the statement of affairs of the Reserve Bank. Borrowings against usance bills and/ or promissory notes are under Section 17(4)(c) of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934. Following a change in the accounting practise for LAF transactions with effect from July 11, 2014, as per the recommendations of Malegam Committee formed to Review the Format of Balance Sheet and the Profit and Loss Account of the Bank, the transactions in case of Repo / Term Repo / MSF are reflected under ‘Borrowings from RBI’.
    £ This excludes advances granted by Scheduled State Co-operative Banks to Co-operative banks. These are included under item VIII (a).
    + Includes Treasury Bills, Treasury Deposits, Treasury Savings Certificates and postal obligations.
    $ Includes advances granted by Scheduled Commercial Banks and Scheduled Cooperative Banks to Public Food Procurement Agencies (viz. Food Corporation of India, State Government and their agencies under the Food consortium).
    Food Credit Outstanding as on
    (Amount in ₹ crore)
    Date 14-Jun-2024 30-May-2025 13-Jun-2025
    Scheduled Commercial Banks 36923.02 70580.71 67605.56
    Scheduled Co-operative Banks 50622.17 51972.99 51974.00

    The expression ‘Banking System’ or ‘Banks’ means the banks and any other financial institution referred to in sub-clauses (i) to (vi) of clause (d) of the explanation below Section 42(1) of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934.

    No. of Scheduled Commercial Banks as on Current Fortnight:120

    Ajit Prasad          
    Deputy General Manager
    (Communications)    

    Press Release: 2025-2026/606

    MIL OSI Economics

  • MIL-OSI: MiningToken Becomes the First to Enable Litecoin Cloud Mining on Mobile Devices, Opening a New Path for LTC Investors

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Brisbane, June 26, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — The Rise of Mobile Litecoin Cloud Mining

    Being called the silver to Bitcoin’s golden one, Litecoin (LTC) has become incredibly popular due to its high speed of transactions, cheap fixed commissions, and good reputation in the crypto community. However, even though Litecoin is still ranked among the top 20 cryptocurrencies, it has traditionally been rather difficult to mine, home to costly, special equipment, technical skills, and enormous energy demands, until recently.

    A mobile-friendly cloud mining platform has emerged, enabling users to mine Litecoin easily from their smartphones. No hardware is required, no electric cost, and it does not need a complex setup. To sweeten the deal, all new users are entitled to a free-of-charge credit of $100, allowing them to begin mining immediately.

    This innovation places MiningToken among the few platforms that accommodate mobile-based Litecoin cloud mining—giving more people an opportunity to earn LTC without spending money on installing physical infrastructure.

    What Makes MiningToken Ideal for Litecoin Mining?

    MiningToken is a secure and convenient provider of cloud mining infrastructure supported by mining farms on an industrial scale. Some of these farms are situated in countries such as Canada, Iceland, and Paraguay where energy sources are primarily renewable—hydroelectric, geothermal, and wind—making the system efficient and environmentally conscious.

    Instead of relying on physical mining rigs, users rent hashpower through short-term contracts. MiningToken’s AI allocates resources to optimize performance and offer users a seamless mining experience.

    Key features include:

    • Mobile-friendly mining via web dashboard
    • Fast sign-up and instant mining
    • AI-optimized resource management
    • $100 free credit for new users
    • No maintenance, electricity, or cooling costs
    • Supports LTC, BTC, DOGE, ETH, and BCH

    For Litecoin enthusiasts, this means accessible mining without financial or technical barriers.

    Mining Plans: Designed for Daily Activity

    MiningToken’s platform features multiple LTC-compatible mining plans supported by real hashrate from a global network of mining centers. These plans are tailored to enable users to engage with the mining process efficiently without investing in physical infrastructure.

    MiningToken offers a wide range of plans hosted across international data centers. Visit Official Website for full details.

    How to Start Mining LTC in Minutes

    Here’s how you can start mining Litecoin with MiningToken right away:

    1. Sign-up – Register your account at www.miningtoken.com.
    2. Claim Your $100 Bonus – A $100 bonus will be credited to your account automatically.
    3. Pick a Plan – Choose from a variety of mining contracts based on your budget and preferences.
    4. Activate Mining – Start mining with your selected plan. Track your progress via your dashboard.
    5. Withdraw Earnings – Withdraw your rewards or reinvest them to scale up your mining activities.

    All features are accessible through both desktop and mobile devices, making it easy to control your mining at any time.

    Security and Sustainability First

    MiningToken supports responsible mining by integrating clean energy and high-level security standards.

    Security features include:

    • Two-factor authentication (2FA)
    • Encrypted cloud wallets
    • Cold storage mechanisms
    • Secure transaction processing

    A Better Way to Mine Litecoin

    Litecoin mining no longer requires expensive hardware or extensive technical knowledge. MiningToken transforms this traditionally resource-heavy activity into a simple, web-based solution. Anyone—from students to investors—can now participate in real-time crypto mining using just a smartphone.

    MiningToken’s system offers a user-friendly, sustainable, and accessible way to engage with Litecoin mining—backed by an AI-driven infrastructure designed to improve efficiency while reducing environmental impact.

    Conclusion

    Whether you’re new to crypto or an experienced trader, MiningToken provides a smart, secure, and accessible way to mine LTC using your phone. With its free $100 sign-up bonus, AI optimization, and energy-efficient data centers, anyone can begin exploring cloud mining within minutes.

    Visit www.miningtoken.com to claim your free bonus and start mining Litecoin today.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Q: Can I mine Litecoin using only the $100 bonus?
    Yes, you can use the sign-up bonus to purchase a mining contract and begin receiving mining rewards without any investment.

    Q: Is MiningToken available internationally?
    Yes. MiningToken services are not region-locked and are accessible globally.

    Q: How is MiningToken different from other mobile mining apps?
    Unlike mining simulation apps, MiningToken connects users to real hashpower and delivers actual mining rewards based on contract performance.

    Q: How do I receive my profits?
    Mining earnings are credited to your wallet daily. Withdrawals are available once the minimum threshold is met.

    Disclaimer:
    The information provided in this press release is not a solicitation for investment, nor is it intended as investment advice, financial advice, or trading advice. Cryptocurrency mining and staking involve risk. There is potential for loss of funds. It is strongly recommended you practice due diligence, including consultation with a professional financial advisor, before investing in or trading cryptocurrency and securities.

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI: MiningToken Becomes the First to Enable Litecoin Cloud Mining on Mobile Devices, Opening a New Path for LTC Investors

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Brisbane, June 26, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — The Rise of Mobile Litecoin Cloud Mining

    Being called the silver to Bitcoin’s golden one, Litecoin (LTC) has become incredibly popular due to its high speed of transactions, cheap fixed commissions, and good reputation in the crypto community. However, even though Litecoin is still ranked among the top 20 cryptocurrencies, it has traditionally been rather difficult to mine, home to costly, special equipment, technical skills, and enormous energy demands, until recently.

    A mobile-friendly cloud mining platform has emerged, enabling users to mine Litecoin easily from their smartphones. No hardware is required, no electric cost, and it does not need a complex setup. To sweeten the deal, all new users are entitled to a free-of-charge credit of $100, allowing them to begin mining immediately.

    This innovation places MiningToken among the few platforms that accommodate mobile-based Litecoin cloud mining—giving more people an opportunity to earn LTC without spending money on installing physical infrastructure.

    What Makes MiningToken Ideal for Litecoin Mining?

    MiningToken is a secure and convenient provider of cloud mining infrastructure supported by mining farms on an industrial scale. Some of these farms are situated in countries such as Canada, Iceland, and Paraguay where energy sources are primarily renewable—hydroelectric, geothermal, and wind—making the system efficient and environmentally conscious.

    Instead of relying on physical mining rigs, users rent hashpower through short-term contracts. MiningToken’s AI allocates resources to optimize performance and offer users a seamless mining experience.

    Key features include:

    • Mobile-friendly mining via web dashboard
    • Fast sign-up and instant mining
    • AI-optimized resource management
    • $100 free credit for new users
    • No maintenance, electricity, or cooling costs
    • Supports LTC, BTC, DOGE, ETH, and BCH

    For Litecoin enthusiasts, this means accessible mining without financial or technical barriers.

    Mining Plans: Designed for Daily Activity

    MiningToken’s platform features multiple LTC-compatible mining plans supported by real hashrate from a global network of mining centers. These plans are tailored to enable users to engage with the mining process efficiently without investing in physical infrastructure.

    MiningToken offers a wide range of plans hosted across international data centers. Visit Official Website for full details.

    How to Start Mining LTC in Minutes

    Here’s how you can start mining Litecoin with MiningToken right away:

    1. Sign-up – Register your account at www.miningtoken.com.
    2. Claim Your $100 Bonus – A $100 bonus will be credited to your account automatically.
    3. Pick a Plan – Choose from a variety of mining contracts based on your budget and preferences.
    4. Activate Mining – Start mining with your selected plan. Track your progress via your dashboard.
    5. Withdraw Earnings – Withdraw your rewards or reinvest them to scale up your mining activities.

    All features are accessible through both desktop and mobile devices, making it easy to control your mining at any time.

    Security and Sustainability First

    MiningToken supports responsible mining by integrating clean energy and high-level security standards.

    Security features include:

    • Two-factor authentication (2FA)
    • Encrypted cloud wallets
    • Cold storage mechanisms
    • Secure transaction processing

    A Better Way to Mine Litecoin

    Litecoin mining no longer requires expensive hardware or extensive technical knowledge. MiningToken transforms this traditionally resource-heavy activity into a simple, web-based solution. Anyone—from students to investors—can now participate in real-time crypto mining using just a smartphone.

    MiningToken’s system offers a user-friendly, sustainable, and accessible way to engage with Litecoin mining—backed by an AI-driven infrastructure designed to improve efficiency while reducing environmental impact.

    Conclusion

    Whether you’re new to crypto or an experienced trader, MiningToken provides a smart, secure, and accessible way to mine LTC using your phone. With its free $100 sign-up bonus, AI optimization, and energy-efficient data centers, anyone can begin exploring cloud mining within minutes.

    Visit www.miningtoken.com to claim your free bonus and start mining Litecoin today.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Q: Can I mine Litecoin using only the $100 bonus?
    Yes, you can use the sign-up bonus to purchase a mining contract and begin receiving mining rewards without any investment.

    Q: Is MiningToken available internationally?
    Yes. MiningToken services are not region-locked and are accessible globally.

    Q: How is MiningToken different from other mobile mining apps?
    Unlike mining simulation apps, MiningToken connects users to real hashpower and delivers actual mining rewards based on contract performance.

    Q: How do I receive my profits?
    Mining earnings are credited to your wallet daily. Withdrawals are available once the minimum threshold is met.

    Disclaimer:
    The information provided in this press release is not a solicitation for investment, nor is it intended as investment advice, financial advice, or trading advice. Cryptocurrency mining and staking involve risk. There is potential for loss of funds. It is strongly recommended you practice due diligence, including consultation with a professional financial advisor, before investing in or trading cryptocurrency and securities.

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI: MiningToken Becomes the First to Enable Litecoin Cloud Mining on Mobile Devices, Opening a New Path for LTC Investors

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Brisbane, June 26, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — The Rise of Mobile Litecoin Cloud Mining

    Being called the silver to Bitcoin’s golden one, Litecoin (LTC) has become incredibly popular due to its high speed of transactions, cheap fixed commissions, and good reputation in the crypto community. However, even though Litecoin is still ranked among the top 20 cryptocurrencies, it has traditionally been rather difficult to mine, home to costly, special equipment, technical skills, and enormous energy demands, until recently.

    A mobile-friendly cloud mining platform has emerged, enabling users to mine Litecoin easily from their smartphones. No hardware is required, no electric cost, and it does not need a complex setup. To sweeten the deal, all new users are entitled to a free-of-charge credit of $100, allowing them to begin mining immediately.

    This innovation places MiningToken among the few platforms that accommodate mobile-based Litecoin cloud mining—giving more people an opportunity to earn LTC without spending money on installing physical infrastructure.

    What Makes MiningToken Ideal for Litecoin Mining?

    MiningToken is a secure and convenient provider of cloud mining infrastructure supported by mining farms on an industrial scale. Some of these farms are situated in countries such as Canada, Iceland, and Paraguay where energy sources are primarily renewable—hydroelectric, geothermal, and wind—making the system efficient and environmentally conscious.

    Instead of relying on physical mining rigs, users rent hashpower through short-term contracts. MiningToken’s AI allocates resources to optimize performance and offer users a seamless mining experience.

    Key features include:

    • Mobile-friendly mining via web dashboard
    • Fast sign-up and instant mining
    • AI-optimized resource management
    • $100 free credit for new users
    • No maintenance, electricity, or cooling costs
    • Supports LTC, BTC, DOGE, ETH, and BCH

    For Litecoin enthusiasts, this means accessible mining without financial or technical barriers.

    Mining Plans: Designed for Daily Activity

    MiningToken’s platform features multiple LTC-compatible mining plans supported by real hashrate from a global network of mining centers. These plans are tailored to enable users to engage with the mining process efficiently without investing in physical infrastructure.

    MiningToken offers a wide range of plans hosted across international data centers. Visit Official Website for full details.

    How to Start Mining LTC in Minutes

    Here’s how you can start mining Litecoin with MiningToken right away:

    1. Sign-up – Register your account at www.miningtoken.com.
    2. Claim Your $100 Bonus – A $100 bonus will be credited to your account automatically.
    3. Pick a Plan – Choose from a variety of mining contracts based on your budget and preferences.
    4. Activate Mining – Start mining with your selected plan. Track your progress via your dashboard.
    5. Withdraw Earnings – Withdraw your rewards or reinvest them to scale up your mining activities.

    All features are accessible through both desktop and mobile devices, making it easy to control your mining at any time.

    Security and Sustainability First

    MiningToken supports responsible mining by integrating clean energy and high-level security standards.

    Security features include:

    • Two-factor authentication (2FA)
    • Encrypted cloud wallets
    • Cold storage mechanisms
    • Secure transaction processing

    A Better Way to Mine Litecoin

    Litecoin mining no longer requires expensive hardware or extensive technical knowledge. MiningToken transforms this traditionally resource-heavy activity into a simple, web-based solution. Anyone—from students to investors—can now participate in real-time crypto mining using just a smartphone.

    MiningToken’s system offers a user-friendly, sustainable, and accessible way to engage with Litecoin mining—backed by an AI-driven infrastructure designed to improve efficiency while reducing environmental impact.

    Conclusion

    Whether you’re new to crypto or an experienced trader, MiningToken provides a smart, secure, and accessible way to mine LTC using your phone. With its free $100 sign-up bonus, AI optimization, and energy-efficient data centers, anyone can begin exploring cloud mining within minutes.

    Visit www.miningtoken.com to claim your free bonus and start mining Litecoin today.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Q: Can I mine Litecoin using only the $100 bonus?
    Yes, you can use the sign-up bonus to purchase a mining contract and begin receiving mining rewards without any investment.

    Q: Is MiningToken available internationally?
    Yes. MiningToken services are not region-locked and are accessible globally.

    Q: How is MiningToken different from other mobile mining apps?
    Unlike mining simulation apps, MiningToken connects users to real hashpower and delivers actual mining rewards based on contract performance.

    Q: How do I receive my profits?
    Mining earnings are credited to your wallet daily. Withdrawals are available once the minimum threshold is met.

    Disclaimer:
    The information provided in this press release is not a solicitation for investment, nor is it intended as investment advice, financial advice, or trading advice. Cryptocurrency mining and staking involve risk. There is potential for loss of funds. It is strongly recommended you practice due diligence, including consultation with a professional financial advisor, before investing in or trading cryptocurrency and securities.

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI: American Rebel Light Beer Sees Explosive E-Commerce Growth as Free Shipping Promo Drives Patriotic Sales Surge Ahead of July 4th

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Online Orders Soar as American Rebel Beer Ships to Over 40 States; Free Shipping Available Through June 30

    NASHVILLE, TN, June 26, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — American Rebel Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: AREB) (“American Rebel” or the “Company”), creator of American Rebel Beer (americanrebelbeer.com) and a designer, manufacturer, and marketer of branded safes, personal security and self-defense products and apparel, proudly reports explosive online sales growth fueled by enhanced digital marketing, optimized checkout performance, and a limited-time Free Shipping offer celebrating the Fourth of July and the 250th Birthday of the U.S. Army.

    American Rebel Light Beer launched its online direct to consumer option earlier this year through shop.americanrebelbeer.com, that expanded availability to over 40 U.S. states, giving patriotic Americans nationwide the opportunity to enjoy what the company calls “America’s Patriotic, God-Fearing, Constitution-Loving, National Anthem-Singing, Stand Your Ground Beer.”

    Patriotic Reach, Real Results: 22.9 Million Digital Impressions Drive Explosive Growth at AmericanRebelBeer.com

    In late May, American Rebel implemented major improvements to the online checkout process after onboarding e-commerce experts to map the user experience and identify where sales were stalling. That analysis led to the introduction of Flat Rate Shipping, which sparked an immediate lift in order volume. Encouraged by this success, and in celebration of Independence Day, the company launched a Free Shipping offer through June 30, 2025 – driving massive engagement and accelerating repeat orders.

    During this campaign period American Rebel generated a combined 22.9 million digital impressions across Facebook, Google, and Taboola – demonstrating exceptional consumer engagement and marketing reach across top-tier platforms. This digital expansion is translating into powerful, measurable business outcomes at americanrebelbeer.com

    Key highlights from the most recent performance period include:

    • Gross Online Sales surged 1100% driven by explosive customer demand.
    • Average Order Value (AOV) increased 14% to $59.62.
    • Conversion rates rose 1100%, signaling highly qualified traffic and improved customer targeting.
    • Orders climbed 1000%, marking a significant uptick in new and repeat purchases.
    • Website traffic jumped 4500%, amplifying visibility and brand discovery.
    • 48-pack beer sales soared 2900%, indicating a strong shift toward bulk purchases.
    • 24-pack (16oz) sales rose 801%, further validating product-market fit.
    • RCR (Repeat Customer Rate) improved by 72.7%, a clear indicator of growing customer satisfaction and long-term loyalty.

    We’re Not Just Selling Beer – We’re Building America’s Brand

    “This level of performance demonstrates what we’ve always believed – American Rebel Light Beer (“Rebel Light”) resonates with patriotic American consumers,” said Andy Ross, CEO of American Rebel Holdings. “We’re not just selling beer; we’re building a patriotic brand that people are proud to support. We’re building a brand rooted in freedom, faith, and love for country. Our customers aren’t just buying a beer, they’re standing for something, and the numbers speak for themselves – we are scaling, we are converting, and we are winning.”

    American Rebel’s performance is not only accelerating consumer sales but also establishing a strong foundation for long-term shareholder value through proven demand, smart digital investments, and expanding distribution opportunities.

    American Rebel Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: AREB) operates as a consumer brand company rooted in American values, offering American Rebel Light Beer and related merchandise across a growing national footprint. America’s Patriotic Brand continues to gain traction across the lifestyle, beverage, and digital commerce sectors.

    American Rebel Beer Shipping Now to 40+ States

    American Rebel Light Beer is available for home delivery in the following states:
    AZ, CA, CO, CT, DC, DE, FL, GA, ID, IL, IN, IA, KS, KY, LA, ME, MD, MA, MN, MO, MT, NC, NV, NH, NJ, NM, NY, OH, OK, OR, PA, RI, TX, VT, WA, WV, WI, WY

    The Free Shipping promotion, available through Monday, June 30, allows customers to stock up ahead of Independence Day. American Rebel encourages fans to order directly at shop.americanrebelbeer.com and celebrate freedom with every sip.

    About American Rebel Light Beer

    American Rebel Light is more than just a beer – it’s a celebration of freedom, passion, and quality. Brewed with care and precision, our light beer delivers a refreshing taste that’s perfect for every occasion.

    Since its launch in September 2024, American Rebel Light Beer has rolled out in Tennessee, Connecticut, Kansas, Kentucky, Ohio, Iowa, Missouri, North Carolina, Florida, Indiana and now Virginia and is adding new distributors and territories regularly. For more information about the launch events and the availability of American Rebel Beer, please visit americanrebelbeer.com or follow us on our social media platforms (@americanrebelbeer).

    American Rebel Light is a Premium Domestic Light Lager Beer – All Natural, Crisp, Clean and Bold Taste with a Lighter Feel. With approximately 100 calories, 3.2 carbohydrates, and 4.3% alcoholic content per 12 oz serving, American Rebel Light Beer delivers a lighter option for those who love great beer but prefer a more balanced lifestyle. It’s all natural with no added supplements and importantly does not use corn, rice, or other sweeteners typically found in mass produced beers.

    For more information about American Rebel Light Beer follow us on social media @AmericanRebelBeer.

    For more information, visit americanrebelbeer.com.

    About American Rebel Holdings, Inc.

    American Rebel Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: AREB) has operated primarily as a designer, manufacturer and marketer of branded safes and personal security and self-defense products and has recently transitioned into the beverage industry through the introduction of American Rebel Light Beer. The Company also designs and produces branded apparel and accessories. To learn more, visit americanrebelbeer.com. For investor information, visit americanrebel.com/investor-relations.

    Watch the American Rebel Story as told by our CEO Andy Ross visit The American Rebel Story

    Media Inquiries:
    Matt Sheldon
    Matt@Precisionpr.co
    917-280-7329

    American Rebel Holdings, Inc.
    info@americanrebel.com
    ir@americanrebel.com

    American Rebel Beverages, LLC
    Todd Porter, President
    tporter@americanrebelbeer.com

    Forward-Looking Statements

    This press release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. American Rebel Holdings, Inc., (NASDAQ: AREB; AREBW) (the “Company,” “American Rebel,” “we,” “our” or “us”) desires to take advantage of the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and is including this cautionary statement in connection with this safe harbor legislation. The words “forecasts” “believe,” “may,” “estimate,” “continue,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “should,” “plan,” “could,” “target,” “potential,” “is likely,” “expect” and similar expressions, as they relate to us, are intended to identify forward-looking statements. We have based these forward-looking statements primarily on our current expectations and projections about future events and financial trends that we believe may affect our financial condition, results of operations, business strategy, and financial needs. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ from those in the forward-looking statements include benefits of our continued sponsorship of high profile events, success and availability of the promotional activities, our ability to effectively execute our business plan, and the Risk Factors contained within our filings with the SEC, including our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024 and our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2025. Any forward-looking statement made by us herein speaks only as of the date on which it is made. Factors or events that could cause our actual results to differ may emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for us to predict all of them. We undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise, except as may be required by law.

    Attachment

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI: American Rebel Light Beer Sees Explosive E-Commerce Growth as Free Shipping Promo Drives Patriotic Sales Surge Ahead of July 4th

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Online Orders Soar as American Rebel Beer Ships to Over 40 States; Free Shipping Available Through June 30

    NASHVILLE, TN, June 26, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — American Rebel Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: AREB) (“American Rebel” or the “Company”), creator of American Rebel Beer (americanrebelbeer.com) and a designer, manufacturer, and marketer of branded safes, personal security and self-defense products and apparel, proudly reports explosive online sales growth fueled by enhanced digital marketing, optimized checkout performance, and a limited-time Free Shipping offer celebrating the Fourth of July and the 250th Birthday of the U.S. Army.

    American Rebel Light Beer launched its online direct to consumer option earlier this year through shop.americanrebelbeer.com, that expanded availability to over 40 U.S. states, giving patriotic Americans nationwide the opportunity to enjoy what the company calls “America’s Patriotic, God-Fearing, Constitution-Loving, National Anthem-Singing, Stand Your Ground Beer.”

    Patriotic Reach, Real Results: 22.9 Million Digital Impressions Drive Explosive Growth at AmericanRebelBeer.com

    In late May, American Rebel implemented major improvements to the online checkout process after onboarding e-commerce experts to map the user experience and identify where sales were stalling. That analysis led to the introduction of Flat Rate Shipping, which sparked an immediate lift in order volume. Encouraged by this success, and in celebration of Independence Day, the company launched a Free Shipping offer through June 30, 2025 – driving massive engagement and accelerating repeat orders.

    During this campaign period American Rebel generated a combined 22.9 million digital impressions across Facebook, Google, and Taboola – demonstrating exceptional consumer engagement and marketing reach across top-tier platforms. This digital expansion is translating into powerful, measurable business outcomes at americanrebelbeer.com

    Key highlights from the most recent performance period include:

    • Gross Online Sales surged 1100% driven by explosive customer demand.
    • Average Order Value (AOV) increased 14% to $59.62.
    • Conversion rates rose 1100%, signaling highly qualified traffic and improved customer targeting.
    • Orders climbed 1000%, marking a significant uptick in new and repeat purchases.
    • Website traffic jumped 4500%, amplifying visibility and brand discovery.
    • 48-pack beer sales soared 2900%, indicating a strong shift toward bulk purchases.
    • 24-pack (16oz) sales rose 801%, further validating product-market fit.
    • RCR (Repeat Customer Rate) improved by 72.7%, a clear indicator of growing customer satisfaction and long-term loyalty.

    We’re Not Just Selling Beer – We’re Building America’s Brand

    “This level of performance demonstrates what we’ve always believed – American Rebel Light Beer (“Rebel Light”) resonates with patriotic American consumers,” said Andy Ross, CEO of American Rebel Holdings. “We’re not just selling beer; we’re building a patriotic brand that people are proud to support. We’re building a brand rooted in freedom, faith, and love for country. Our customers aren’t just buying a beer, they’re standing for something, and the numbers speak for themselves – we are scaling, we are converting, and we are winning.”

    American Rebel’s performance is not only accelerating consumer sales but also establishing a strong foundation for long-term shareholder value through proven demand, smart digital investments, and expanding distribution opportunities.

    American Rebel Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: AREB) operates as a consumer brand company rooted in American values, offering American Rebel Light Beer and related merchandise across a growing national footprint. America’s Patriotic Brand continues to gain traction across the lifestyle, beverage, and digital commerce sectors.

    American Rebel Beer Shipping Now to 40+ States

    American Rebel Light Beer is available for home delivery in the following states:
    AZ, CA, CO, CT, DC, DE, FL, GA, ID, IL, IN, IA, KS, KY, LA, ME, MD, MA, MN, MO, MT, NC, NV, NH, NJ, NM, NY, OH, OK, OR, PA, RI, TX, VT, WA, WV, WI, WY

    The Free Shipping promotion, available through Monday, June 30, allows customers to stock up ahead of Independence Day. American Rebel encourages fans to order directly at shop.americanrebelbeer.com and celebrate freedom with every sip.

    About American Rebel Light Beer

    American Rebel Light is more than just a beer – it’s a celebration of freedom, passion, and quality. Brewed with care and precision, our light beer delivers a refreshing taste that’s perfect for every occasion.

    Since its launch in September 2024, American Rebel Light Beer has rolled out in Tennessee, Connecticut, Kansas, Kentucky, Ohio, Iowa, Missouri, North Carolina, Florida, Indiana and now Virginia and is adding new distributors and territories regularly. For more information about the launch events and the availability of American Rebel Beer, please visit americanrebelbeer.com or follow us on our social media platforms (@americanrebelbeer).

    American Rebel Light is a Premium Domestic Light Lager Beer – All Natural, Crisp, Clean and Bold Taste with a Lighter Feel. With approximately 100 calories, 3.2 carbohydrates, and 4.3% alcoholic content per 12 oz serving, American Rebel Light Beer delivers a lighter option for those who love great beer but prefer a more balanced lifestyle. It’s all natural with no added supplements and importantly does not use corn, rice, or other sweeteners typically found in mass produced beers.

    For more information about American Rebel Light Beer follow us on social media @AmericanRebelBeer.

    For more information, visit americanrebelbeer.com.

    About American Rebel Holdings, Inc.

    American Rebel Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: AREB) has operated primarily as a designer, manufacturer and marketer of branded safes and personal security and self-defense products and has recently transitioned into the beverage industry through the introduction of American Rebel Light Beer. The Company also designs and produces branded apparel and accessories. To learn more, visit americanrebelbeer.com. For investor information, visit americanrebel.com/investor-relations.

    Watch the American Rebel Story as told by our CEO Andy Ross visit The American Rebel Story

    Media Inquiries:
    Matt Sheldon
    Matt@Precisionpr.co
    917-280-7329

    American Rebel Holdings, Inc.
    info@americanrebel.com
    ir@americanrebel.com

    American Rebel Beverages, LLC
    Todd Porter, President
    tporter@americanrebelbeer.com

    Forward-Looking Statements

    This press release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. American Rebel Holdings, Inc., (NASDAQ: AREB; AREBW) (the “Company,” “American Rebel,” “we,” “our” or “us”) desires to take advantage of the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and is including this cautionary statement in connection with this safe harbor legislation. The words “forecasts” “believe,” “may,” “estimate,” “continue,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “should,” “plan,” “could,” “target,” “potential,” “is likely,” “expect” and similar expressions, as they relate to us, are intended to identify forward-looking statements. We have based these forward-looking statements primarily on our current expectations and projections about future events and financial trends that we believe may affect our financial condition, results of operations, business strategy, and financial needs. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ from those in the forward-looking statements include benefits of our continued sponsorship of high profile events, success and availability of the promotional activities, our ability to effectively execute our business plan, and the Risk Factors contained within our filings with the SEC, including our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024 and our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2025. Any forward-looking statement made by us herein speaks only as of the date on which it is made. Factors or events that could cause our actual results to differ may emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for us to predict all of them. We undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise, except as may be required by law.

    Attachment

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Mary River crocodile targeted for removal

    Source: Tasmania Police

    Issued: 26 Jun 2025

    Wildlife officers have confirmed the presence of an estuarine crocodile in the Mary River near Dundathu in the Wide Bay region, which will be targeted for removal from the wild.

    On 24 June 2025, the Department of the Environment, Tourism, Science and Innovation (DETSI) received a crocodile sighting report of an estimated 2.5 metre crocodile basking on the bank before sliding into the river.

    Wildlife officers have contacted the person who submitted the report, and conducted a site inspection on 25 June 2025. Wildlife officers will attempt to direct capture the crocodile.

    DETSI would like to thank the person who made the crocodile sighting report which provided important information about the location and behaviour of the animal.

    The Mary River in the Wide Bay area is considered atypical crocodile habitat, and any crocodile confirmed to be present is targeted for removal from the wild.

    Anyone who sees what they believe to be a crocodile in the Mary River, or the Wide Bay region is encouraged to make a sighting report as soon as possible.

    Crocodile sightings can be reported by using the QWildlife app, completing a crocodile sighting report on the DETSI website, or by calling 1300 130 372. The department investigates every crocodile sighting report received.

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI: Micron Technology, Inc. Reports Results for the Third Quarter of Fiscal 2025

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Record revenue in fiscal Q3 with growth across end markets
    Fiscal Q4 revenue projected to grow another 15% sequentially

    BOISE, Idaho, June 25, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Micron Technology, Inc. (Nasdaq: MU) today announced results for its third quarter of fiscal 2025, which ended May 29, 2025.

    Fiscal Q3 2025 highlights

    • Revenue of $9.30 billion versus $8.05 billion for the prior quarter and $6.81 billion for the same period last year
    • GAAP net income of $1.89 billion, or $1.68 per diluted share
    • Non-GAAP net income of $2.18 billion, or $1.91 per diluted share
    • Operating cash flow of $4.61 billion versus $3.94 billion for the prior quarter and $2.48 billion for the same period last year

    “Micron delivered record revenue in fiscal Q3, driven by all-time-high DRAM revenue including nearly 50% sequential growth in HBM revenue. Data center revenue more than doubled year-over-year and reached a quarterly record, and consumer-oriented end markets had strong sequential growth,” said Sanjay Mehrotra, Chairman, President and CEO of Micron Technology. “We are on track to deliver record revenue with solid profitability and free cash flow in fiscal 2025, while we make disciplined investments to build on our technology leadership and manufacturing excellence to satisfy growing AI-driven memory demand.”

    Quarterly Financial Results
    (in millions, except per share amounts) GAAP(1)   Non-GAAP(2)
    FQ3-25 FQ2-25 FQ3-24   FQ3-25 FQ2-25 FQ3-24
                   
    Revenue $ 9,301   $ 8,053   $ 6,811     $ 9,301   $ 8,053   $ 6,811  
    Gross margin   3,508     2,963     1,832       3,623     3,053     1,917  
    percent of revenue   37.7 %   36.8 %   26.9 %     39.0 %   37.9 %   28.1 %
    Operating expenses   1,339     1,190     1,113       1,133     1,046     976  
    Operating income   2,169     1,773     719       2,490     2,007     941  
    percent of revenue   23.3 %   22.0 %   10.6 %     26.8 %   24.9 %   13.8 %
    Net income   1,885     1,583     332       2,181     1,783     702  
    Diluted earnings per share   1.68     1.41     0.30       1.91     1.56     0.62  
                                           

    For the third quarter of 2025, investments in capital expenditures, net(2) were $2.66 billion and adjusted free cash flow(2) was $1.95 billion. Micron ended the quarter with cash, marketable investments, and restricted cash of $12.22 billion. On June 25, 2025, Micron’s Board of Directors declared a quarterly dividend of $0.115 per share, payable in cash on July 22, 2025, to shareholders of record as of the close of business on July 7, 2025.

    Business Outlook

    The following table presents Micron’s guidance for the fourth quarter of 2025:

    FQ4-25 GAAP(1)Outlook Non-GAAP(2)Outlook
    Revenue $10.7 billion ± $300 million $10.7 billion ± $300 million
    Gross margin 41.0% ± 1.0% 42.0% ± 1.0%
    Operating expenses $1.35 billion ± $20 million $1.20 billion ± $20 million
    Diluted earnings per share $2.29 ± $0.15 $2.50 ± $0.15
         

    Further information regarding Micron’s business outlook is included in the prepared remarks and slides, which have been posted at investors.micron.com.

    Investor Webcast

    Micron will host a conference call on Wednesday, June 25, 2025 at 2:30 p.m. Mountain Time to discuss its third quarter financial results and provide forward-looking guidance for its fourth quarter. A live webcast of the call will be available online at investors.micron.com. A webcast replay will be available for one year after the call. For Investor Relations and other company updates, follow us on X @MicronTech.

    About Micron Technology, Inc.

    We are an industry leader in innovative memory and storage solutions transforming how the world uses information to enrich life for all. With a relentless focus on our customers, technology leadership, manufacturing, and operational excellence, Micron delivers a rich portfolio of high-performance DRAM, NAND, and NOR memory and storage products through our Micron® and Crucial® brands. Every day, the innovations that our people create fuel the data economy, enabling advances in artificial intelligence (AI) and compute-intensive applications that unleash opportunities — from the data center to the intelligent edge and across the client and mobile user experience. To learn more about Micron Technology, Inc. (Nasdaq: MU), visit micron.com.

    © 2025 Micron Technology, Inc. All rights reserved. Micron, the Micron logo, and all other Micron trademarks are the property of Micron Technology, Inc. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners.

    Forward-Looking Statements

    This press release contains forward-looking statements regarding our technologies, demand for our products, our investments, our industry and our financial and operating results, including our expectations and guidance for the fourth quarter of 2025 and full fiscal year. These forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially. Please refer to the documents we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including our most recent Form 10-K and our upcoming Form 10-Q. These documents contain and identify important factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those contained in these forward-looking statements. These certain factors can be found at investors.micron.com/risk-factor. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance, or achievements. We are under no duty to update any of the forward-looking statements to conform these statements to actual results.

    (1) GAAP represents U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.
    (2) Non-GAAP represents GAAP excluding the impact of certain activities, which management excludes in analyzing our operating results and understanding trends in our earnings, adjusted free cash flow, and business outlook. Further information regarding Micron’s use of non-GAAP measures and reconciliations between GAAP and non-GAAP measures are included within this press release.
       
    MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC.
    CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
    (In millions, except per share amounts)
    (Unaudited)
     
      3rd Qtr. 2nd Qtr. 3rd Qtr. Nine Months Ended
      May 29,
    2025
    February 27,
    2025
    May 30,
    2024
    May 29,
    2025
    May 30,
    2024
               
    Revenue $ 9,301   $ 8,053   $ 6,811   $ 26,063   $ 17,361  
    Cost of goods sold   5,793     5,090     4,979     16,244     14,485  
    Gross margin   3,508     2,963     1,832     9,819     2,876  
               
    Research and development   965     898     850     2,751     2,527  
    Selling, general, and administrative   318     285     291     891     834  
    Other operating (income) expense, net   56     7     (28 )   61     (267 )
    Operating income (loss)   2,169     1,773     719     6,116     (218 )
               
    Interest income   135     108     136     350     398  
    Interest expense   (123 )   (112 )   (150 )   (353 )   (426 )
    Other non-operating income (expense), net   (68 )   (11 )   10     (90 )   (24 )
        2,113     1,758     715     6,023     (270 )
               
    Income tax (provision) benefit   (235 )   (177 )   (377 )   (695 )   172  
    Equity in net income (loss) of equity method investees   7     2     (6 )   10     (11 )
    Net income (loss) $ 1,885   $ 1,583   $ 332   $ 5,338   $ (109 )
               
    Earnings (loss) per share          
    Basic $ 1.69   $ 1.42   $ 0.30   $ 4.79   $ (0.10 )
    Diluted   1.68     1.41     0.30     4.75     (0.10 )
               
    Number of shares used in per share calculations          
    Basic   1,118     1,115     1,107     1,114     1,104  
    Diluted   1,125     1,123     1,123     1,123     1,104  
    MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC.
    CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
    (In millions)
    (Unaudited)
     
    As of May 29,
    2025
    February 27,
    2025
    August 29,
    2024
           
    Assets      
    Cash and cash equivalents $ 10,163   $ 7,552   $ 7,041  
    Short-term investments   648     663     1,065  
    Receivables   7,436     6,504     6,615  
    Inventories   8,727     9,007     8,875  
    Other current assets   945     963     776  
    Total current assets   27,919     24,689     24,372  
    Long-term marketable investments   1,402     1,375     1,046  
    Property, plant, and equipment   44,773     42,528     39,749  
    Operating lease right-of-use assets   628     637     645  
    Intangible assets   426     423     416  
    Deferred tax assets   483     552     520  
    Goodwill   1,150     1,150     1,150  
    Other noncurrent assets   1,616     1,699     1,518  
    Total assets $ 78,397   $ 73,053   $ 69,416  
           
    Liabilities and equity      
    Accounts payable and accrued expenses $ 8,761   $ 6,176   $ 7,299  
    Current debt   538     504     431  
    Other current liabilities   836     1,197     1,518  
    Total current liabilities   10,135     7,877     9,248  
    Long-term debt   15,003     13,851     12,966  
    Noncurrent operating lease liabilities   600     599     610  
    Noncurrent unearned government incentives   603     836     550  
    Other noncurrent liabilities   1,308     1,257     911  
    Total liabilities   27,649     24,420     24,285  
           
    Commitments and contingencies      
           
    Shareholders’ equity      
    Common stock   126     126     125  
    Additional capital   12,960     12,711     12,115  
    Retained earnings   45,559     43,839     40,877  
    Treasury stock   (7,852 )   (7,852 )   (7,852 )
    Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)   (45 )   (191 )   (134 )
    Total equity   50,748     48,633     45,131  
    Total liabilities and equity $ 78,397   $ 73,053   $ 69,416  
    MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC.
    CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
    (In millions)
    (Unaudited)
     
    Nine Months Ended May 29,
    2025
    May 30,
    2024
         
    Cash flows from operating activities    
    Net income (loss) $ 5,338   $ (109 )
    Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:    
    Depreciation expense and amortization of intangible assets   6,203     5,794  
    Stock-based compensation   722     620  
    Change in operating assets and liabilities:    
    Receivables   (123 )   (2,562 )
    Inventories   148     (125 )
    Other current assets   (206 )   (435 )
    Accounts payable and accrued expenses   38     846  
    Other current liabilities   (681 )   769  
    Other   356     304  
    Net cash provided by operating activities   11,795     5,102  
         
    Cash flows from investing activities    
    Expenditures for property, plant, and equipment   (10,199 )   (5,266 )
    Purchases of available-for-sale securities   (1,203 )   (1,110 )
    Proceeds from government incentives   1,294     267  
    Proceeds from maturities and sales of available-for-sale securities   1,249     1,433  
    Other   (30 )   (35 )
    Net cash used for investing activities   (8,889 )   (4,711 )
         
    Cash flows from financing activities    
    Proceeds from issuance of debt   4,430     999  
    Repayments of debt   (3,604 )   (1,816 )
    Payments of dividends to shareholders   (392 )   (384 )
    Payments on equipment purchase contracts       (127 )
    Other   (220 )   (40 )
    Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities   214     (1,368 )
         
    Effect of changes in currency exchange rates on cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash   (3 )   (15 )
         
    Net increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash   3,117     (992 )
    Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash at beginning of period   7,052     8,656  
    Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash at end of period $ 10,169   $ 7,664  
    MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC.
    RECONCILIATION OF GAAP TO NON-GAAP MEASURES
    (In millions, except per share amounts)
     
      3rd Qtr. 2nd Qtr. 3rd Qtr.
      May 29,
    2025
    February 27,
    2025
    May 30,
    2024
           
    GAAP gross margin $ 3,508   $ 2,963   $ 1,832  
    Stock-based compensation   115     89     80  
    Other       1     5  
    Non-GAAP gross margin $ 3,623   $ 3,053   $ 1,917  
           
    GAAP operating expenses $ 1,339   $ 1,190   $ 1,113  
    Stock-based compensation   (148 )   (144 )   (137 )
    Patent license charges   (57 )        
    Other   (1 )        
    Non-GAAP operating expenses $ 1,133   $ 1,046   $ 976  
           
    GAAP operating income $ 2,169   $ 1,773   $ 719  
    Stock-based compensation   263     233     217  
    Patent license charges   57          
    Other   1     1     5  
    Non-GAAP operating income $ 2,490   $ 2,007   $ 941  
           
    GAAP net income $ 1,885   $ 1,583   $ 332  
    Stock-based compensation   263     233     217  
    Patent license charges   57          
    Loss on debt prepayments   46     4      
    Other   1         3  
    Estimated tax effects of above and other tax adjustments   (71 )   (37 )   150  
    Non-GAAP net income $ 2,181   $ 1,783   $ 702  
           
    GAAP weighted-average common shares outstanding – Diluted   1,125     1,123     1,123  
    Adjustment for stock-based compensation   19     20     13  
    Non-GAAP weighted-average common shares outstanding – Diluted   1,144     1,143     1,136  
           
    GAAP diluted earnings per share $ 1.68   $ 1.41   $ 0.30  
    Effects of the above adjustments   0.23     0.15     0.32  
    Non-GAAP diluted earnings per share $ 1.91   $ 1.56   $ 0.62  
    RECONCILIATION OF GAAP TO NON-GAAP MEASURES, Continued
     
      3rd Qtr. 2nd Qtr. 3rd Qtr.
      May 29,
    2025
    February 27,
    2025
    May 30,
    2024
           
    GAAP net cash provided by operating activities $ 4,609   $ 3,942   $ 2,482  
           
    Expenditures for property, plant, and equipment   (2,938 )   (4,055 )   (2,086 )
    Payments on equipment purchase contracts           (45 )
    Proceeds from sales of property, plant, and equipment   12     7     41  
    Proceeds from government incentives   266     963     33  
    Investments in capital expenditures, net   (2,660 )   (3,085 )   (2,057 )
    Adjusted free cash flow $ 1,949   $ 857   $ 425  
     

    The tables above reconcile GAAP to non-GAAP measures of gross margin, operating expenses, operating income, net income, diluted shares, diluted earnings per share, and adjusted free cash flow. The non-GAAP adjustments above may or may not be infrequent or nonrecurring in nature but are a result of periodic or non-core operating activities. We believe this non-GAAP information is helpful in understanding trends and in analyzing our operating results and earnings. We are providing this information to investors to assist in performing analysis of our operating results. When evaluating performance and making decisions on how to allocate our resources, management uses this non-GAAP information and believes investors should have access to similar data when making their investment decisions. We believe these non-GAAP financial measures increase transparency by providing investors with useful supplemental information about the financial performance of our business, enabling enhanced comparison of our operating results between periods and with peer companies. The presentation of these adjusted amounts varies from amounts presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP and therefore may not be comparable to amounts reported by other companies. Our management excludes the following items as applicable in analyzing our operating results and understanding trends in our earnings:

    • Stock-based compensation;
    • Gains and losses from settlements;
    • Gains and losses from debt prepayments;
    • Restructure and asset impairments; and
    • The estimated tax effects of above, non-cash changes in net deferred income taxes, assessments of tax exposures, certain tax matters related to prior fiscal periods, and significant changes in tax law. The divergence between our GAAP and non-GAAP income tax provision relates to the difference in our GAAP and non-GAAP estimated annual effective tax rates, which are computed separately.

    Non-GAAP diluted shares are adjusted for the impact of additional shares resulting from the exclusion of stock-based compensation from non-GAAP income.

    MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC.
    RECONCILIATION OF GAAP TO NON-GAAP OUTLOOK
     
    FQ4-25   GAAP Outlook   Adjustments   Non-GAAP Outlook
                   
    Revenue $10.7 billion ± $300 million         $10.7 billion ± $300 million
    Gross margin 41.0% ± 1.0%   1.0%   A   42.0% ± 1.0%
    Operating expenses $1.35 billion ± $20 million   $147 million   B   $1.20 billion ± $20 million
    Diluted earnings per share(1) $2.29 ± $0.15   $0.21   A, B, C   $2.50 ± $0.15
    Non-GAAP Adjustments
    (in millions)
               
                   
    A Stock-based compensation – cost of goods sold   $ 119  
    B Stock-based compensation – research and development     93  
    B Stock-based compensation – sales, general, and administrative     54  
    C Tax effects of the above items and other tax adjustments     (27 )
                  $ 239  
    (1) GAAP earnings per share based on approximately 1.13 billion diluted shares and non-GAAP earnings per share based on approximately 1.15 billion diluted shares.
       

    The tables above reconcile our GAAP to non-GAAP guidance based on the current outlook. The guidance does not incorporate the impact of any potential business combinations, divestitures, additional restructuring activities, balance sheet valuation adjustments, strategic investments, financing transactions, and other significant transactions. The timing and impact of such items are dependent on future events that may be uncertain or outside of our control.

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI Europe: RECOMMENDATION on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Implementing Protocol (2025-2030) to the Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Government of Greenland and the Government of Denmark – A10-0099/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    DRAFT EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION

    on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Implementing Protocol (2025-2030) to the Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Government of Greenland and the Government of Denmark

    (COM(2024)0479 – C10-0227/2024 – 2024/0263(NLE))

    (Consent)

    The European Parliament,

     having regard to the draft Council decision (14652/2024),

     having regard to the Protocol on the implementation of the Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union, of the one part, and the Government of Greenland and the Government of Denmark, of the other part (2025-2030) (14781/24),

     having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 43(2) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a)(v), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C10‑0227/2024),

     having regard to its non-legislative resolution of …[1] on the draft decision,

     having regard to the budgetary assessment by the Committee on Budgets,

     having regard to Rule 107(1) and (4) and Rule 117(7) of its Rules of Procedure,

     having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Fisheries (A10-0099/2025),

    1. Gives its consent to the conclusion of the agreement;

    2. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States, of the one part, and of Greenland and Denmark, of the other part.

     

    EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

     

    At the end of 2024, Greenland and the European Union signed a new Protocol on the implementation of the Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement (SFPA) (2025-2030). This is a mixed agreement that allows the European Union’s vessels to fish species such as cod, Greenland halibut, redfish and Northern prawn. In return, the European Union pays a financial contribution of EUR 17 296 857 per annum, comprising EUR 14 096 857 for access rights and EUR 3 200 000 for support and implementation of Greenland’s fisheries policy, plus the fees paid by vessel owners. In recent years, the fisheries agreement has allowed around 10 of the European Union’s vessels to operate in the autonomous territory’s waters. The new Protocol provides details of the rules and provisions governing this access.

     

    Fisheries in Greenland

     

    The fisheries sector is of central importance for Greenland in socio-economic and cultural terms. It accounts for 15% of the territory’s jobs and over 90% of its exports. Inshore fishing mainly involves small boats (dinghies), and sustains a local economy and jobs. Many remote Inuit communities rely on subsistence fishing. The territory also has a developed offshore fishing fleet and has fisheries agreements in force that allow foreign vessels to fish in the offshore area. Greenland’s fisheries are suffering the effects of climate change on a vulnerable Arctic marine environment, with particular impacts on the species caught. Greenland has put measures in place to limit the impact of fisheries on the marine environment; these include a ban on discards, a plan for the management of bycatch, etc.

     

    New Protocol implementing the SFPA

     

    The new Protocol that has been signed has a term of six years, providing stability and visibility for stakeholders. It contains provisions aimed at providing a framework for access to waters by European vessels and cooperation with Greenland: fishing opportunities, bycatch, scientific cooperation, monitoring, controls, surveillance, fishing areas, observers etc.

     

    A specific characteristic of the agreement is that catches are regulated on the basis of fishing opportunities that are set annually. Your rapporteur is concerned about the fact that, according to the ex-post evaluation, the TACs for several of the targeted species exceed the limits set on the basis of scientific advice. These proven cases of overfishing, or of uncertainty owing to a lack of data, pose a threat to fish populations and the sustainability of fisheries, as in the case of the Northern prawn. Several indicative fishing opportunities have been reduced. The second noteworthy point is linked to the need for additional data regarding the targeted species and marine ecosystems.

     

    The programming of sectoral support will be adopted in the three months following the application of the Protocol. The sectoral support allocated in recent years has made it possible to support research and scientific assessments, the administration of Greenland’s fisheries, controls and also small-scale coastal fisheries. This is assessed positively in the evaluation of the last Protocol.

     

    Conclusions and recommendations 

     

    In the context of current diplomatic tensions with the United States and the climate crisis in the Arctic, your rapporteur recalls the importance of the SFPA and relations between Greenland and the European Union in the area of fisheries. Through its sectoral support, the fisheries agreement offers assistance that is welcomed by the authorities and a number of civil society actors in Greenland. Positive developments include the increase in the financial contribution paid by the European Union, in the amount of sectoral support and in the fees paid by vessel owners.

     

    Your rapporteur invites the European Union to provide increased support to coastal fishing communities, with respect for the rights of the indigenous peoples and the FAO’s Guidelines for Securing Sustainable Small-Scale Fisheries. It is advisable to ensure that these peoples, as well as NGOs, are involved in the agreement. Another positive development is the European Union’s support in areas such as controls, the fight against IUU fishing, the collection of data and scientific research.

    Your rapporteur underlines the environmental challenges associated with the agreement. As already requested by Parliament in 2021, it is essential to continue efforts in relation to data collection and the fight against overfishing, by following the scientific advice for setting TACs in Greenland and allocating annual fishing opportunities to the European Union. Even though it fishes smaller quantities, the European Union must follow the precautionary principle. The definition of the surplus is controversial in certain cases. The fishing carried out by the European Union’s vessels furthermore has an impact on seabed ecosystems and the emphasis must be on identifying and protecting vulnerable marine ecosystems, with the sector’s help.

     

    Finally, your rapporteur asks for this fisheries agreement to be repositioned in the context of regional fisheries governance. Quota exchanges mean that post-Brexit relations with coastal countries, including Norway, are closely linked to the agreement. The European Union and Greenland must strengthen cooperation and transparency within the RFMOs and the agreements between coastal states. More broadly, the European Union must do more to protect species and the marine environment in the Arctic.

    ANNEX: ENTITIES OR PERSONS FROM WHOM THE RAPPORTEUR HAS RECEIVED INPUT

    Pursuant to Article 8 of Annex I to the Rules of Procedure, the rapporteur declares that he has received input from the following entities or persons in the preparation of the draft report:

    Entity and/or person

    Delegation of France to the European Union

    Delegation of Germany to the European Union

    Delegation of Denmark to the European Union

    Greenland Ministry of Fisheries

    Oceana

    Europêche

    DG MARE (Commission)

    The list above is drawn up under the exclusive responsibility of the rapporteur.

    Where natural persons are identified in the list by their name, by their function or by both, the rapporteur declares that he has submitted to the natural persons concerned the European Parliament’s Data Protection Notice No 484 (https://www.europarl.europa.eu/data-protect/index.do), which sets out the conditions applicable to the processing of their personal data and the rights linked to that processing.

     

     

    BUDGETARY ASSESSMENT OF THE COMMITTEE ON BUDGETS (19.2.2025)

    for the Committee on Fisheries

    on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Implementing Protocol (2025-2030) to the Protocol implementing the Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union on the one hand, and the Government of Greenland and the Government of Denmark, on the other hand

    (COM(2024)0479 – C10‑0227/2024 – 2024/0263(NLE))

    Rapporteur for budgetary assessment: Isabel Benjumea Benjumea

    The Committee on Budgets has carried out a budgetary assessment of the proposal under Rule 58 of the Rules of Procedure and has reached the following conclusions:

    A. whereas the previous 4-year Implementing Protocol to the Agreement will expire on 21 April 2025;

    B. whereas the financial contribution for the entire duration of the new Implementing Protocol is EUR 103 781 000, based on:

    (a) an annual amount for access to fishery resources for the categories provided for in the Protocol, set at EUR 14 096 857 for the duration of the Protocol;

    (b) support for the development of Greenland’s sectoral fisheries policy amounting to EUR 3 200 000 per year for the duration of the Protocol;

    C. whereas the implementation of the Protocol requires the use of operational appropriations, as explained below:

    DG MARE

     

    Year
    N

    Year
    N+1

    Year
    N+2

    Year
    N+3

    Year
    N+4

    Year
    N+5

    TOTAL

    Operational appropriations

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Budget line 08 05 01

    Commitments

    17.296

    17.296

    17.296

    17.296

    17.296

    17.296

    103.781

    Payments

    17.296

    17.296

    17.296

    17.296

    17.296

    17.296

    103.781

    EUR million (to three decimal places)

    D. whereas on 21 November 2024, Parliament approved DEC 15/2024 submitted by the Commission on 25 October 2024, which makes available the necessary appropriations on operational line 08 05 01 to honour the 2024 financial obligations resulting from the new Implementing Protocol;

    E. whereas the Protocol with Greenland and Denmark was signed and entered into provisional application on 12 December 2024;

    1. Notes that the support allocated to the Protocol should meet the objectives of enabling Union vessels to fish in Greenland’s fishing zone, enabling the Union and Greenland to work closely together to further promote the development of a sustainable fisheries policy and the responsible exploitation of fishery resources in Greenland’s fishing zone, and ensuring that the Union and Greenland cooperate to contribute to decent working conditions in the fisheries sector; considers that there should be thorough scrutiny to ensure that the support meets those objectives effectively during the implementation of the Protocol;

    2. Recommends that, for future agreements, an impact assessment of the added value and socio-economic benefits derived from the previous agreement be taken into account; considers that this assessment should guide the negotiation and renewal of subsequent agreements to ensure that they align with the objectives of sustainable development and efficient use of the Union’s financial resources;

    3. Notes that the transfer of appropriations for an amount of EUR 16 992 434 in commitment appropriations, as submitted by the Commission in DEC 15/2024, was approved by the budgetary authority in the time limit provided for in the Financial Regulation; regrets that the decision on this budgetary matter is disconnected from, and had to be taken prior to, the decision on the consent to be given by Parliament to the new Implementing Protocol; underlines that decisions on the agreement itself and related budgetary matters are inextricably linked, and fears, therefore, that the disconnect risks de facto pre-empting the decision on consent and creating a fait accompli;

    4. Calls on the Commission to explain the need for the provisional application of the Implementing Protocol in question, since the existing Implementing Protocol remains in force until April 2025, thus allowing time for the agreement to be finalised without any risk of a gap; calls on the Commission to provide further information about the budgetary implications of the provisional application of the new Implementing Protocol as of 12 December 2024, given the fact that the current Implementing Protocol is still in force;

    5. Takes note that DEC 15/2024 does not include any transfer of payment appropriations to the operational line for 2024 on the basis that, according to the Commission, the first access payment linked to this Implementing Protocol will be due by 30 June 2025; asks the Commission to clarify the lack of synchronisation between commitment and payment appropriations;

    6. Notes that the 2025 budget as voted on in plenary on 27 November 2024 includes amounts of EUR 150 560 000 in commitment appropriations and EUR 135 300 000 in payment appropriations on line 08 05 01, as well as amounts of EUR 59 970 000 in commitment appropriations and EUR 41 620 000 in payment appropriations for fishing activities on reserve line 30 02 02; regrets that the amounts are cumulative and not broken down by fisheries agreements, thus making it difficult for Parliament to scrutinise budget implementation in this field;

    7. Stresses that the financial programming of line 08 05 01 needs to be sufficient to cater for the financial obligations in the years 2026-2027 subject to the decision of the budgetary authority in the annual budgetary procedures; calls for scrutiny regarding the financial programming of line 08 05 01 in the annual budgets of 2026 and 2027;

    8. Concludes that the Committee on Budgets is in a position to advise the Committee on Fisheries, as the committee responsible, to recommend approval of the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Implementing Protocol (2025-2030) to the Protocol implementing the Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union on the one hand, and the Government of Greenland and the Government of Denmark, on the other hand.

    ANNEX: ENTITIES OR PERSONS
    FROM WHOM THE RAPPORTEUR FOR BUDGETARY ASSESSMENT HAS RECEIVED INPUT

    The rapporteur for budgetary assessment declares under her exclusive responsibility that she did not receive input from any entity or person to be mentioned in this Annex pursuant to Article 8 of Annex I to the Rules of Procedure.

     

     

     

    PROCEDURE – COMMITTEE ASKED FOR BUDGETARY ASSESSMENT

    Title

    Implementing Protocol (2025-2030) to the Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Government of Greenland and the Government of Denmark

    References

    14652/2024 – C10-0227/2024 – 2024/0263(NLE)

    Committee(s) responsible

    PECH

     

     

     

     Date announced in plenary

    BUDG

    10.2.2025

    Rapporteur for budgetary assessment

     Date appointed

    Isabel Benjumea Benjumea

    12.12.2024

    Discussed in committee

    16.1.2025

     

     

     

    Date adopted

    19.2.2025

     

     

     

    Result of final vote

    +:

    –:

    0:

    23

    0

    5

    Members present for the final vote

    Georgios Aftias, Rasmus Andresen, Isabel Benjumea Benjumea, Tobiasz Bocheński, Tomasz Buczek, Angéline Furet, Jens Geier, Thomas Geisel, Jean-Marc Germain, Andrzej Halicki, Alexander Jungbluth, Fabienne Keller, Janusz Lewandowski, Giuseppe Lupo, Ignazio Roberto Marino, Victor Negrescu, Matjaž Nemec, Danuše Nerudová, Karlo Ressler, Bogdan Rzońca, Julien Sanchez, Hélder Sousa Silva, Joachim Streit, Carla Tavares, Lucia Yar

    Substitutes present for the final vote

    Moritz Körner, Tiago Moreira de Sá

    Members under Rule 216(7) present for the final vote

    Hildegard Bentele

     

    FINAL VOTE BY ROLL CALL
    IN COMMITTEE ASKED FOR BUDGETARY ASSESSMENT

    23

    +

    ECR

    Tobiasz Bocheński, Bogdan Rzońca

    NI

    Thomas Geisel

    PPE

    Georgios Aftias, Isabel Benjumea Benjumea, Hildegard Bentele, Andrzej Halicki, Janusz Lewandowski, Danuše Nerudová, Karlo Ressler, Hélder Sousa Silva

    Renew

    Fabienne Keller, Moritz Körner, Joachim Streit, Lucia Yar

    S&D

    Jens Geier, Jean-Marc Germain, Giuseppe Lupo, Victor Negrescu, Matjaž Nemec, Carla Tavares

    Verts/ALE

    Rasmus Andresen, Ignazio Roberto Marino

     

     

    5

    0

    ESN

    Alexander Jungbluth

    PfE

    Tomasz Buczek, Angéline Furet, Tiago Moreira de Sá, Julien Sanchez

     

    Key to symbols:

    + : in favour

     : against

    0 : abstention

     

     

     

    PROCEDURE – COMMITTEE RESPONSIBLE

    Title

    Implementing Protocol (2025-2030) to the Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Government of Greenland and the Government of Denmark

    References

    14652/2024 – C10-0227/2024 – 2024/0263(NLE)

    Date of consultation or request for consent

    18.12.2024

     

     

     

    Committee(s) responsible

    PECH

     

     

     

    Committees asked for opinions

     Date announced in plenary

    BUDG

    10.2.2025

     

     

     

    Rapporteurs

     Date appointed

    Emma Fourreau

    18.12.2024

     

     

     

    Discussed in committee

    27.1.2025

    18.3.2025

     

     

    Date adopted

    20.5.2025

     

     

     

    Budgetary assessment

     Date of budgetary assessment

    BUDG

    19.2.2025

     

     

     

    Result of final vote

    +:

    –:

    0:

    24

    1

    2

    Members present for the final vote

    Sakis Arnaoutoglou, Thomas Bajada, Stephen Nikola Bartulica, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Ton Diepeveen, Siegbert Frank Droese, Emma Fourreau, Nicolás González Casares, France Jamet, Nora Junco García, Isabelle Le Callennec, Isabella Lövin, Giuseppe Lupo, Giuseppe Milazzo, Francisco José Millán Mon, Jessica Polfjärd, André Rodrigues, Bert-Jan Ruissen, Sander Smit, António Tânger Corrêa, Emma Wiesner, Stéphanie Yon-Courtin

    Substitutes present for the final vote

    Sebastian Everding, Marco Falcone, Karin Karlsbro, Rasmus Nordqvist

    Members under Rule 216(7) present for the final vote

    Hélder Sousa Silva

    Date tabled

    28.5.2025

     

    FINAL VOTE BY ROLL CALL BY THE COMMITTEE RESPONSIBLE

    24

    +

    ECR

    Stephen Nikola Bartulica, Nora Junco García, Giuseppe Milazzo, Bert-Jan Ruissen

    PPE

    Carmen Crespo Díaz, Marco Falcone, Isabelle Le Callennec, Francisco José Millán Mon, Jessica Polfjärd, Sander Smit, Hélder Sousa Silva

    PfE

    Ton Diepeveen, António Tânger Corrêa

    Renew

    Karin Karlsbro, Emma Wiesner, Stéphanie Yon-Courtin

    S&D

    Sakis Arnaoutoglou, Thomas Bajada, Nicolás González Casares, Giuseppe Lupo, André Rodrigues

    The Left

    Emma Fourreau

    Verts/ALE

    Isabella Lövin, Rasmus Nordqvist

     

    1

    ESN

    Siegbert Frank Droese

     

    2

    0

    PfE

    France Jamet

    The Left

    Sebastian Everding

     

    Key to symbols:

    + : in favour

     : against

    0 : abstention

     

     

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI: Santech Holdings Announces Unaudited Financial Results for the First Half of Fiscal Year 2025

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    HONG KONG, June 25, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Santech Holdings Ltd. (“Santech” or the “Company”) (NASDAQ: STEC) today announced its unaudited financial results for the first half of fiscal year 2025 ended December 31, 2024.

    Santech is a Cayman Islands holding company operating through its subsidiaries in Hong Kong and United States, primarily focusing on exploring opportunities in consumer technology, consumer healthcare and enterprise technology.

    First Half of Fiscal Year 2025 Highlights

    Continuing Operations

    Net revenues

    Total revenues from continuing operations in the six months ended December 31, 2024 decreased to nil from US$17.4 million in the same period of 2023, primarily due to Company having completely exited from overseas wealth management and asset management businesses during the reporting period. All remaining revenues from our prior overseas wealth management and asset management businesses during the reporting period have been reclassified under discontinued operations.

    Operating Costs and Expenses

    Cost of compensation and benefits from continuing operations in the six months ended December 31, 2024 decreased to nil from US$13.2 million in the same period of 2023.

    Sales and marketing expenses from continuing operations decreased to nil from US$1.5 million in the same period of 2023.

    All direct costs of revenue from overseas wealth management and asset management during the reporting period have been reclassified under discontinued operations.

    General and administrative expenses from continuing operations in the six months ended December 31, 2024 decreased by 4.3% to US$2.4 million from US$2.5 million in the same period of 2023, primarily due to ongoing cost cutting and restructuring.

    Other expenses, net from continuing operations in the six months ended December 31, 2024 were US$0.2 million, primarily due to the losses on early termination of operating lease.

    Discontinued Operations

    Results of discontinued operations are as follows:

               
      Six Months Ended December 31, 2023
      Two Months Ended August 31, 2024
      (US$’000)   (US$’000)
           
    Discontinued operations      
           
    Net revenues      
    Wealth management 2,442     11  
    Asset management 1,788     1,170  
    Total net revenues 4,230     1,181  
           
    Operating cost and expenses      
    Compensation and benefits 1,358     602  
    Sales and marketing expenses 315      
    General and administrative expenses 656     266  
    Asset impairment loss 2,158      
    Total operating cost and expenses 4,487     868  
           
    (Loss)/income from operations (257 )   313  
           
    Other expense, net (4 )   (1 )
           
    Income/(loss) before income tax expense (261 )   312  
    Income tax (expense)/credit (145 )   (29 )
    Net income/(loss) from discontinued operations (406 )   283  
           
    Gain on disposal of subsidiaries from discontinued operations, net     138  
           
    (Loss)/income for the year from discontinued operations, net of income taxes (406 )   421  
           

    In August 2024, the Company completely exited from its historical businesses in overseas wealth management and asset management and disposed of certain subsidiaries in Hong Kong, namely, Haiyin Insurance (Hong Kong) Co., Limited and Hywin International Insurance Broker Limited for nil consideration, and Haiyin International Asset Management Limited and Hywin Asset Management (Hong Kong) Limited for US$0.6 million to a third party. The disposal was completed on August 31, 2024. After the disposals, the Company no longer holds any financial services licenses or houses any personnel licensed to provide financial services in Hong Kong.

    Net revenues

    Total revenues from discontinued operations in the two months ended August 31, 2024 decreased by 72.1% to US$1.2 million from US$4.2 million in the six months ended December 31, 2023, primarily due to cessation of operations in wealth management and asset management.

    Operating Costs and Expenses

    Cost of compensation and benefits from discontinued operations in the two months ended August 31, 2024 decreased by 55.7% to US$0.6 million from US$1.4 million, in line with the decreases in transaction value of wealth management and asset management businesses.

    Sales and marketing expenses decreased to nil from US$0.3 million in the six months ended December 31, 2023, due to discontinuation of sales and marketing activities.

    General and administrative expenses from discontinued operations in the two months ended August 31, 2024 decreased by 59.5% to US$0.3 million from US$0.7 million in the six months ended December 31, 2023.

    Asset impairment loss from discontinued operations in the six months ended December 31, 2023 represented impairment losses due to impairment of assets held in the PRC, and impairment of intangible assets including software and licenses due to disruption to our brand and our licensed financial services operations in Hong Kong.

    Loss from disposal of subsidiaries under discontinued operations

      Wealth management business   Asset management business   Total
      (US$’000)   (US$’000)   (US$’000)
               
    Considerations received     641     641  
    Less: Net assets disposed of (134 )   (369 )   (503 )
               
    (Loss)/gain from disposal of subsidiaries (134 )   272     138  
     
     

    About Santech Holdings Limited
    Santech Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: STEC) is a technology-focused company. The Company historically served a large number of high net-worth clients in China and Hong Kong in wealth management, asset management and health management, and accumulated a large customer base. The Company has since exited or disposed of its historical businesses in financial services, and is actively exploring innovative new opportunities in technology verticals, including and not limited to consumer technologies and enterprise technologies. For more information, please visit https://ir.santechholdings.com.

    Safe Harbor Statement
    This press release contains statements that may constitute “forward-looking” statements pursuant to the “safe harbor” provisions of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements can be identified by terminology such as “anticipate,” “estimate,” “forecast,” “plan,” “project,” “potential,” “continue,” “ongoing,” “expect,” “aim,” “believe,” “intend,” “may,” “should,” “will,” “is/are likely to,” “could” and similar statements. Statements that are not historical facts, including statements about the Company’s beliefs, plans, and expectations, are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements involve inherent risks and uncertainties. Further information regarding these and other risks is included in the Company’s filings with the SEC. All information provided in this press release is as of the date of this press release, and the Company does not undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statement, except as required under applicable law.

    Investor Contact:
    Santech Holdings Limited
    Email: ir@santechholdings.com

    SANTECH HOLDINGS LTD.
    CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
    (In thousands, except for number of shares and per share data)
     
      June 30,
    2024
      December 31,
    2024
      (US$’000)   (US$’000)
    Assets      
    Current assets:      
    Cash and cash equivalents 15,184     11,233  
    Deposits, prepayments and other current assets 320     72  
    Total current assets 15,504     11,305  
           
    Property and equipment, net 3     4  
    Right-of-use asset 1,235      
    Total non-current assets 1,238     4  
           
    Total Assets 16,742     11,309  
           
    Liabilities and Shareholders’ equity      
    Current liabilities:      
    Commission payable 859      
    Income tax payable 91      
    Due to related parties 11,488     11,062  
    Other payables and accrued liabilities 433     7  
    Lease liability 1,059      
    Total current liabilities 13,930     11,069  
           
    Lease liability 250      
    Total non-current liabilities 250      
           
    Total Liabilities 14,180     11,069  
           
    Shareholders’ Equity:      
    Ordinary shares (US$0.0001 par value; authorized 500,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 56,000,000* shares (28,000,000 ADS) as of June 30, 2024, and December 31, 2024, respectively) 6     6  
    Additional paid-in capital 33,256     33,256  
    Accumulated deficit (30,700 )   (33,022 )
    Total shareholders’ equity 2,562     240  
           
    Total Liabilities and shareholders’ equity 16,742     11,309  
     
    SANTECH HOLDINGS LTD.
    CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
    (In thousands, except for share and per share data, or otherwise stated)
             
    Six Months Ended December 31,  
    2023   2024
      (US$’000)   (US$’000)
           
    Continuing operations      
           
    Net revenues      
    Insurance referral 17,351      
    Total net revenues 17,351      
           
    Operating cost and expenses      
    Compensation and benefits 13,210      
    Share-based compensation expense 102      
    Sales and marketing expenses 1,512      
    General and administrative expenses 2,469     2,364  
    Total operating cost and expenses 17,293     2,364  
           
    Income/(loss) from operations 58     (2,364 )
    Other income/(expenses)      
    Interest expense, net (63 )   (17 )
    Other income/(expense), net 72     (245 )
    Total other income/(expense), net 9     (262 )
           
    Income/(loss) before income tax expense 67     (2,626 )
    Income tax (expense)/credit     (117 )
    Net income/(loss) from continuing operations 67     (2,743 )
           
    Discontinued operations      
           
    (Loss)/income for the year from discontinued operations, net of income taxes (406 )   421  
           
    Net loss and comprehensive loss for the period (339 )   (2,322 )
           
    (Loss)/income per share      
    From continuing and discontinued operations      
    Ordinary share – Basic (0.01 )   (0.04 )
    Ordinary share – Diluted (0.01 )   (0.04 )
    ADS – Basic (0.01 )   (0.08 )
    ADS – Diluted (0.01 )   (0.08 )
           
    From continuing operations      
    Ordinary share – Basic 0.00     (0.05 )
    Ordinary share – Diluted 0.00     (0.05 )
    ADS – Basic 0.00     (0.10 )
    ADS – Diluted 0.00     (0.10 )
           
           
    From continuing and discontinued operations      
    Ordinary share – Basic (0.01 )   0.01  
    Ordinary share – Diluted (0.01 )   0.01  
    ADS – Basic (0.01 )   0.02  
    ADS – Diluted (0.01 )   0.02  
           
    Weighted average number outstanding:      
    Ordinary share – Basic 56,000,000     56,000,000  
    Ordinary share – Diluted 56,000,000     56,000,000  
    ADS – Basic 28,000,000     28,000,000  
    ADS – Diluted 28,000,000     28,000,000  
     
    SANTECH HOLDINGS LTD.
    NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
    (In thousands, except for share and per share data, or otherwise stated)
                                 
      Ordinary shares   Additional
    paid-in
    capital
      Accumulated
    deficit
      Total
    Shareholders’
    equity
                             
      Number of ordinary shares   Amount                  
            (US$’000)   (US$’000)   (US$’000)   (US$’000)
                 
                                 
    Balance as of June 30, 2024 56,000,000     6     33,256     (30,700 )   2,562  
     
    Net loss for the period             (2,322 )   (2,322 )
     
    Balance as of December 31, 2024 56,000,000     6     33,256     (33,022 )   240  
     

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI USA: News 06/24/2025 Blackburn, Blumenthal, Lee, Klobuchar, and Durbin Introduce Bipartisan Antitrust Bill to Promote App Store Competition

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn)
    WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, U.S. Senators Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.), Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), Mike Lee (R-Utah), Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), and Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) introduced the bipartisan Open App Markets Act, which would set fair, clear, and enforceable rules to promote competition and strengthen consumer protections within the app market. Google and Apple currently have gatekeeper control of the two dominant mobile operating systems and their app stores that allow them to exclusively dictate the terms of the app market, inhibiting competition and restricting consumer choice.

    “The days of Big Tech’s anticompetitive, price-gouging business practices are over;” saidSenator Durbin. “Our bipartisan Open App Markets Act places important limits on dominant gatekeeping companies in the app store market, like Apple and Google. These clear, fair, and enforceable rules will open the app markets back up to competition and give consumers more choices. I look forward to working with Republicans and Democrats to make it law.”
    BACKGROUND
    Mobile devices are central to consumers’ economic, social, and civic lives, and the mobile app market is a significant part of the digital economy. In 2024 alone, consumers worldwide spent 92 billion U.S. dollars on the Apple App Store, and about 35.7 billion U.S. dollars on the Google Play Store.
    Both Apple and Google have appeared to use their powerful gatekeeper control to stifle competition in the app store market.
    Apple has prevented the creation of third-party app stores on iPhones, required that apps exclusively use their own expensive payment system, and penalized app developers for telling users about discounted offers.
    These strict terms close off avenues of competition and drive up prices for consumers.
    Startups also face serious challenges when Big Tech gatekeepers are able to prioritize their own apps to the disadvantage of others, make use of competitors’ confidential business information, and block developers from using features on a consumer’s phone.
    THE OPEN APP MARKETS ACT
    The Open App Markets Act would:
    Protect developers’ rights to tell consumers about lower prices and offer competitive pricing;
    Protect sideloading of apps;
    Promote competition by opening the market to third-party app stores, startup apps, and alternative payment systems;
    Make it possible for developers to offer new experiences that take advantage of consumer device features;
    Give consumers greater control over their devices;
    Prevent app stores from disadvantaging developers; and
    Establish safeguards to preserve consumer privacy, security, and safety.
    Click here for bill text.
    ENDORSEMENTS
    The Open App Markets Act is endorsed by numerous technology and consumer groups, including Spotify, the American Economic Liberties Project, the American Principles Project, Epic Games, the Bull Moose Project,  the Coalition for App Fairness, Consumer Action for a Strong Economy, the Digital First Project, the Digital Progress Institute, The Ethics and Public Policy Center, the Foundation for American Innovation, the Internet Accountability Project, the National Security Institute, Proton, Public Knowledge, Tech Oversight Project, and Y Combinator:

    “We applaud Senators Blackburn and Blumenthal for reintroducing the Open App Markets Act, continuing the fight for a free and fair internet in the United States. This bill takes a targeted, strategic approach that will create more economic opportunity, unlock innovation, reduce barriers for businesses and creators, and give American consumers lower prices and more control over purchases made through their iPhones,” said Dustee Jenkins, Spotify Chief Public Affairs Officer.

    “Hundreds of billions of dollars pass through mobile app stores annually, and both Apple and Google have gone to extraordinary, illegal lengths to make sure they are the only stores in town, stealing untold billions from developers and consumers in the process. While Apple and Google drag out their appeals in federal court, the Open App Markets Act would tear down walled gardens, stimulate innovation, and protect developers and consumers from unfair app store taxes today,” said Lee Hepner, Senior Counsel, American Economic Liberties Project.

    “The American Principles Project strongly supports the Open App Markets Act as essential legislation to protect American families from Big Tech’s monopolistic control. Apple and Google’s stranglehold over the app marketplace has created a rigged system that stifles economic opportunity for small businesses and undermines free expression online. This legislation will restore free market principles while ensuring that families have access to diverse viewpoints and applications that reflect their values. The current 30 percent tax imposed by these gatekeepers amounts to corporate welfare for Big Tech at the expense of Main Street America, and it’s time for Congress to stand with American families and small businesses against Silicon Valley’s unchecked power,” stated the American Principles Project.

    “The Open App Markets Act is a must-pass bill that would force Apple and Google to end their anticompetitive mobile app store practices. Apple and Google’s unfair terms and exorbitant fees stifle competition and crush innovation, hurting developers and consumers alike. We look forward to swift passage of this bill and an open mobile app ecosystem in the U.S. with alternative app stores and in-app payment systems,” said Bakari Middleton, VP of Public Policy at Epic Games.

    “The future of digital innovation depends on fair access—not corporate gatekeeping. The Open App Markets Act is a crucial step towards breaking the stranglehold of Big Tech, levels the playing field, and puts power back where it belongs: with users and creators,” stated the Bull Moose Project.

    “CAF commends Senators Blackburn and Blumenthal for introducing the Open App Markets Act and Senators Lee and Klobuchar for co-sponsoring the bill. This groundbreaking, bipartisan legislation will open up Apple and Google’s mobile walled gardens to long-overdue competition. By banning harmful and anti-competitive practices, the bill would lead to lower prices and more choice  in how apps are accessed and distributed. Thanks to a recent court decision, US consumers are already benefiting from app developers offering alternative ways to make purchases. But legislation is needed to fully unlock the potential of the mobile app economy and unleash a competitive marketplace that benefits users and developers alike. We are grateful to Senators Blackburn and Blumenthal for their enduring leadership on these issues, and we encourage swift passage of this vital bill,” said Gene Burrus, Global Policy Counsel for the Coalition for App Fairness.

    “Imagine a fisherman sailing on a vast ocean yet having only two fishing poles from which to choose. This is our current mobile economy: vast seas of information, data, and innovation accessible only through the iron grip of the app-store duopoly of Google and Apple, who continue to game the rules in their favor. It’s time to open the digital high-seas for developers large and small, to spark more free-market innovation for America’s consumers and for our position as the global leader in digital technology,” stated Consumer Action for a Strong Economy.

    “Our team at Digital First Project is proud to support the reintroduction of the Open App Markets Act. This essential reform is a crucial step toward restoring competition and fairness in the digital marketplace by ending the gatekeeper control of dominant app store platforms such as Google and Apple. By promoting consumer choice and giving developers more freedom, this proposal fosters innovation among app developers and enables more choice for consumers,” stated theDigital First Project.

    “Apple and Google are the choke points of the mobile ecosystem and their Herculean control over app stores is at the heart of it. OAMA is a bipartisan, responsible approach to ensure the innovation economy can flourish and not be bridled by Big Tech. This is a welcomed and needed reform!” stated the Digital Progress Institute.

    “For years, Apple and Google have failed to protect children from harmful content on their app stores. Even worse, they have promoted inappropriate apps to children in their stores. But because of their market power, parents and children have no alternatives in the mobile ecosystem. The Open App Markets Act would enable different app stores and app distribution methods that cater to the specific needs of families. OAMA would critically allow for family-friendly and child-safe app stores to arise as competitors to give parents alternative options that better protect kids. I commend Senators Blackburn and Blumenthal for this effort and their continued leadership in protecting children from digital harms,” said Clare Morell, Fellow at The Ethics and Public Policy Center.

    “Apple and Google are the gatekeepers to the mobile ecosystem, and they have continually abused that power. Their app store monopoly rents are an effective tax on the entire app economy, and other anti-competitive practices have further limited choice and innovation. The Open App Markets Act would help lift the millstone that Apple and Google put on consumers and developers by bringing much-needed competition to mobile app stores and app distribution. I commend Senators Blackburn, Blumenthal, Lee, and Klobuchar for their leadership and urge all members of Congress to join this effort,” said Evan Swarztrauber, Senior Fellow at the Foundation for American Innovation.

    “The reintroduction of the Open App Markets Act is another crucial step in the battle to rein in the unchecked power of Big Tech. Senators Blackburn and Blumenthal deserve credit for their continued bipartisan leadership and commitment to restoring fairness and competition in the app marketplace. Apple and Google have operated as unaccountable, monopolistic gatekeepers on the app store market for far too long. This bill would finally give small businesses and entrepreneurs a real shot to compete. The Internet Accountability Project proudly supports this legislation that stands up for fairness and competition,” stated the Internet Accountability Project.

    “I have observed in my doctoral thesis of 2017 that there is a de facto app store duopoly between Apple and Google, controlling which apps are seen and under which conditions. Whether an app can even be found requires an investment in app store optimization (ASO). App developers have only two means to access end users, and there is limited competition on the conditions, leaving app developers as price takers. While there are benefits of centralization of app markets, there are tradeoffs in privacy and choice. In any event, the scale of such concentration would bring regulatory scrutiny in any other industry. The two app stores have enjoyed a relative regulatory free ride for a long time. Few policymakers have been interested in taking on this behemoth. Hence I applaud Senator Blackburn and Senator Blumenthal for their leadership,” said Roslyn Layton, PhD, Senior Fellow at the National Security Institute.

    “App stores are the lifeblood of all digital companies, including disruptors like Proton. Gatekeepers like Apple and Google have been consolidating market power in their app marketplaces for years, ultimately to the detriment of consumers. They have exploited their control to impose extortionate conditions on developers, like compelling use of their own payment systems and charging 30% transaction fees. This amounts to a massive tax on the Internet, one that often gets passed onto consumers through higher prices or reduced investment in competitive innovations. Ending these monopoly abuses on mobile payments would not only create fairer prices, but also promote competition while benefiting developers and consumers alike. Proton applauds Senators Blumenthal, Blackburn, and X for recognizing these realities, and drafting a bill that would unleash a seismic level of innovation,” said Andy Yen, Founder & CEO of Proton.

    “Too often, the tech giants have controlled the app marketplace, dictating who gets access and under what terms. The Open App Markets Act represents a much-needed shift toward a more competitive, open ecosystem where developers are empowered to innovate and users are the ultimate beneficiaries. We need policies that prioritize security, transparency, and choice, rather than allowing corporations to dictate the rules. It’s time for users, not Big Tech, to decide what apps thrive in the marketplace. This bill is a step toward restoring market fairness and putting users back in the driver’s seat,” stated Public Knowledge.

    “Google and Apple’s app store monopolies have not only artificially inflated prices, they’ve also blocked new and innovative products from hitting the market. Their gatekeeping has been a drag on our entire economy, and it’s time to make their monopolies illegal. The Open App Markets Act will help dislodge app store monopolies, lower prices, and build a better, more open internet,” said Sacha Haworth, Executive Director of the Tech Oversight Project.

    “This bipartisan legislation ends the practice of dominant app stores forcing their own payment systems and self-preferencing, while giving consumers the freedom to install and set third-party stores and payment options—common-sense rules already embraced in other markets. Enacting it will spur competition, lower prices, and unleash a new wave of American innovation that keeps our startup ecosystem the most dynamic in the world,” said Luther Lowe, Head of Public Policy for Y Combinator.
    RELATED

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Farm-to-forest Ban passes first reading

    Source: New Zealand Government

    The Government has taken a major step towards protecting food production by ending the large-scale conversion of productive farmland into pine plantations, with the first reading of the Climate Change Response (Emissions Trading Scheme—Forestry Conversion) Amendment Bill receiving unanimous support in Parliament last night.

    “This Bill is about protecting our most valuable land that grows food for export and sustains rural communities,” Agriculture and Forestry Minister Todd McClay says. 

    “For too long, ETS incentives have driven the wrong outcomes for our rural sector.”

    “Once farms are planted in trees as a result of carbon credits we lose the ability to produce the high-quality safe food that consumers demand – and we lose rural jobs, export earnings, and the families that go with them. Today we are putting a stop to the harm that this has done to rural New Zealand.”

    The Bill will:

    • Prevent exotic forests from entering the ETS on LUC 1–5 land (New Zealand’s most productive soil);
    • Limit new ETS registrations on LUC 6 land to 15,000 hectares per year, allocated by ballot;
    • Allow up to 25 per cent of a farm to go into the ETS, preserving landowner choice while ending full-farm conversions;
    • Protect eligible Māori-owned land, and provide time-limited exemptions for pre-announced investments.

    The Bill includes temporary exemptions where an investor can provide evidence of a qualifying forestry investment between 1 January 2021 and 4 December 2024. For instance, the purchase of land and ordering of trees prior to 4 December 2024 would be an example of proof of a qualifying investment, whilst each of these actions alone would not. 

    “The last Government sat back while 300,000 hectares of farmland were sold off for carbon credits. That short-sighted policy puts ideology ahead of long-term food security. We’re reversing that damage.”

    The new settings will take effect from 4 December 2024, with the law coming fully into force in October 2025.

    MIL OSI New Zealand News

  • MIL-OSI: Anterix Inc. Reports Full Fiscal Year 2025 Results

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    WOODLAND PARK, N.J., June 24, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Anterix (NASDAQ: ATEX) today announced fiscal 2025 fourth quarter and full fiscal year financial results and filed its 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2025. The Company also issued an update on its Demonstrated Intent metric which can be found on Anterix’s website at https://investors.anterix.com/events-presentations.

    Full Year FY2025 Financial and Operational Highlights

    • Appointed Scott Lang as President and Chief Executive Officer effective October 8, 2024
    • Appointed Thomas Kuhn as Executive Chairman of the Board in January 2025
    • Executed new spectrum sale agreements with Oncor Electric Delivery Company LLC (“Oncor”) for $102.5 million in June 2024 and Lower Colorado River Authority (“LCRA”) for $13.5 million in January 2025
    • Received milestone payments of $8.5 million from Ameren Corporation (“Ameren”) and $44.0 million from Oncor
    • Approximately $147 million of contracted proceeds outstanding with approximately $80 million to be received in fiscal 2026
    • Exchanged narrowband for broadband licenses in 67 counties and recorded a $22.8 million gain
    • Invested $18.1 million in spectrum clearing costs
    • Secured FCC approval of a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to expand the current paired 3 x 3 MHz broadband segment to a paired 5 x 5 MHz broadband segment within the 900 MHz band in January 2025
    • Initiated a strategic review process after receiving inbound interest in the Company in February 2025 which remains ongoing
    • Launched the AnterixAccelerator™ industry engagement initiative in March 2025 to speed up utility adoption of private broadband networks; the program is now oversubscribed with utilities actively engaged in discussions and negotiations for $250 million in 900 MHz spectrum incentives
    • Approximately $3 billion pipeline of prospective contract opportunities across 60+ potential customers

    Fourth Quarter FY2025 Financial Highlights

    • Exchanged narrowband for broadband licenses in 47 counties and recorded a $2.0 million gain
    • Transferred four broadband licenses to Oncor and recorded an $18.3 million gain on the sale of intangible assets
    • Invested $5.5 million in spectrum clearing costs
    • Successfully identified and executed on several measures to reduce operating expenses, mainly through cuts in consulting fees and headcount costs

    Liquidity and Balance Sheet

    At March 31, 2025, the Company had no debt and cash and cash equivalents of $47.4 million. In addition, the Company had a restricted cash balance of $7.7 million in escrow deposits.

    The Company has an authorized share repurchase program for up to $250.0 million of the Company’s common stock on or before September 21, 2026. In the fiscal 2025 fourth quarter and full fiscal, Anterix had share repurchase activity of $2.0 million and $8.4 million, respectively. As of March 31, 2025, $227.7 million is remaining under the share repurchase program.

    Conference Call Information

    Anterix senior management will hold an analyst and investor conference call to provide a business update at 9:00 A.M. ET on Wednesday, June 25, 2025. Participants interested in joining the call’s live question and answer session are required to pre-register by clicking on the following link https://investors.anterix.com/events/event-details/q4-fy2025-anterix-earnings-conference-call to obtain a dial-in number and unique PIN. It is recommended that you join the call at least 10 minutes before the conference call begins. The call is also being webcast live and will be accessible on the Investor Relations section of Anterix’s website at https://investors.anterix.com/events-presentations. Following the event, a replay of the call will also be available on the Anterix website.

    About Anterix Inc.

    At Anterix, we work with leading utilities and technology companies to harness the power of 900 MHz broadband for modernized grid solutions. Leading an ecosystem of more than 125 members, we offer utility-first solutions to modernize the grid and solve the challenges that utilities are facing today. As the largest holder of licensed spectrum in the 900 MHz band (896-901/935-940 MHz) throughout the contiguous United States, plus Alaska, Hawaii, and Puerto Rico, we are uniquely positioned to enable private wireless broadband solutions that support cutting-edge advanced communications capabilities for a cleaner, safer, and more secure energy future. To learn more and join the 900 MHz movement, please visit www.anterix.com.

    Forward-Looking Statements

    Certain statements contained in this press release constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws that involve risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements include, without limitation, any statement that may predict, forecast, indicate or imply future events or achievements such as statements in this press release related to Anterix’s business, financial results, outlook, or opportunities. Actual events or results may differ materially from those contemplated in this press release. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made and readers are cautioned not to put undue reliance on such statements, as they are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause Anterix’s actual future results to differ materially from results indicated in the forward-looking statement. Such statements are based on assumptions that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements, including: (i) the timing of payments under customer agreements; (ii) Anterix’s ability to clear the 900 MHz Broadband Spectrum on a timely basis and on commercially reasonable terms; (iii) Anterix’s ability to timely secure broadband licenses; (iv) Anterix’s ability to successfully commercialize its spectrum assets to its targeted utility customers in accordance with its plans and expectations; (v) Anterix’s ability to execute on its customer engagement initiatives; (vi) the timing and outcome of Anterix’s strategic review process; (vii) whether Anterix will be able to identify, develop or execute on any actions as a result of its strategic review process and (viii) competition in the market for spectrum and spectrum solutions offered by Anterix. Actual events or results may differ materially from those contemplated in this press release. Anterix’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), which you may obtain for free at the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov, discuss some of the important risk factors that may affect the Company’s financial outlook, business, results of operations and financial condition. Anterix undertakes no obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking statements contained herein.

    Shareholder Contact

    Natasha Vecchiarelli
    Vice President, Investor Relations & Corporate Communications
    Anterix
    973-531-4397
    nvecchiarelli@anterix.com

     
     
    Anterix Inc.
    Earnings Release Tables
    Consolidated Balance Sheets
    (in thousands, except share and per share data)
     
      March 31, 2025   March 31, 2024
    ASSETS
    Current assets      
    Cash and cash equivalents $ 47,374     $ 60,578  
    Non-trade receivable   2,926        
    Spectrum receivable   7,107       8,521  
    Escrow deposits   547        
    Prepaid expenses and other current assets   2,801       3,912  
    Total current assets   60,755       73,011  
    Escrow deposits   7,103       7,546  
    Property and equipment, net   1,302       2,062  
    Right of use assets, net   4,829       4,432  
    Intangible assets   228,983       216,743  
    Deferred broadband costs   28,944       19,772  
    Other assets   1,188       1,328  
    Total assets $ 333,104     $ 324,894  
    LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
    Current liabilities      
    Accounts payable and other accrued expenses $ 9,075     $ 8,631  
    Accrued severance and other related charges   2,265        
    Due to related parties   30        
    Operating lease liabilities   1,643       1,850  
    Contingent liability   8,093       1,000  
    Deferred revenue   6,095       6,470  
    Total current liabilities   27,201       17,951  
    Operating lease liabilities   3,747       3,446  
    Contingent liability   15,336       15,000  
    Deferred revenue   118,577       115,742  
    Deferred gain on sale of intangible assets   4,911       4,911  
    Deferred income tax   6,606       6,281  
    Other liabilities   125       531  
    Total liabilities   176,503       163,862  
    Commitments and contingencies      
    Stockholders’ equity      
    Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value per share, 10,000,000 shares authorized and no shares outstanding at March 31, 2025 and March 31, 2024          
    Common stock, $0.0001 par value per share, 100,000,000 shares authorized and 18,612,804 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2025 and 18,452,892 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2024   2       2  
    Additional paid-in capital   548,542       533,203  
    Accumulated deficit   (391,943 )     (372,173 )
    Total stockholders’ equity   156,601       161,032  
    Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $ 333,104     $ 324,894  
           
    Anterix Inc.
    Earnings Release Tables
    Consolidated Statements of Operations
    (in thousands, except share and per share data)
                   
      Three Months Ended March 31,   Year Ended March 31,
        2025       2024       2025       2024  
    Spectrum revenue $ 1,389     $ 1,260     $ 6,031     $ 4,191  
                   
    Operating expenses              
    General and administrative   9,220       9,593       42,671       44,423  
    Sales and support   1,594       1,728       6,110       5,693  
    Product development   1,089       2,243       5,735       5,697  
    Severance and other related charges   258             3,771        
    Depreciation and amortization   76       191       548       844  
    Operating expenses   12,237       13,755       58,835       56,657  
    Gain on exchange of intangible assets, net   (1,953 )     (1,989 )     (22,799 )     (35,024 )
    Gain on sale of intangible assets, net   (18,294 )           (18,294 )     (7,364 )
    Loss from disposal of long-lived assets, net   3       5       3       44  
    Income (loss) from operations   9,396       (10,511 )     (11,714 )     (10,122 )
    Interest income   446       926       2,159       2,374  
    Other income   40       44       75       233  
    Income (loss) before income taxes   9,882       (9,541 )     (9,480 )     (7,515 )
    Income tax expense (benefit)   674       (130 )     1,892       1,613  
    Net income (loss) $ 9,208     $ (9,411 )   $ (11,372 )   $ (9,128 )
    Net income (loss) per common share basic $ 0.50     $ (0.51 )   $ (0.61 )   $ (0.49 )
    Net income (loss) per common share diluted $ 0.49     $ (0.51 )   $ (0.61 )   $ (0.49 )
    Weighted-average common shares used to compute basic net income (loss) per share   18,577,700       18,483,292       18,562,446       18,765,190  
    Weighted-average common shares used to compute diluted net income (loss) per share   18,709,205       18,483,292       18,562,446       18,765,190  
                   
    Anterix Inc.
    Earnings Release Tables
    Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
    (in thousands)
                   
      Three Months Ended March 31,   Year Ended March 31,
        2025       2024       2025       2024  
    CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES              
    Net income (loss) $ 9,208     $ (9,411 )   $ (11,372 )   $ (9,128 )
    Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities              
    Depreciation and amortization   76       191       548       844  
    Stock compensation expense   2,912       3,483       13,531       15,507  
    Deferred income taxes   (130 )     (51 )     325       841  
    Rights of use assets   431       2,770       1,657       1,512  
    Gain on exchange of intangible assets, net   (1,953 )     (1,989 )     (22,799 )     (35,024 )
    Gain on sale of intangible assets, net   (18,294 )           (18,294 )     (7,364 )
    Loss from disposal of long-lived assets, net   3       5       3       44  
    Changes in operating assets and liabilities              
    Non-trade receivable   (2,926 )           (2,926 )      
    Prepaid expenses and other assets   (139 )     (1,493 )     1,126       (1,171 )
    Accounts payable and other accrued expenses   167       348       550       1,936  
    Accrued severance and other related charges   (25 )           2,265        
    Due to related parties   30             30       (533 )
    Operating lease liabilities   (507 )     (2,865 )     (1,960 )     (1,924 )
    Contingent liability   (4,001 )           5,999       15,000  
    Deferred revenue   (1,389 )     15,152       2,460       61,453  
    Other liabilities   (18 )           (406 )      
    Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities   (16,555 )     6,140       (29,263 )     41,993  
    CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES              
    Purchases of intangible assets, including refundable deposits, retuning costs and swaps   (5,474 )     (2,222 )     (18,095 )     (17,031 )
    Proceeds from sale of spectrum   40,935             40,935       25,427  
    Purchases of equipment   (46 )     (40 )     (87 )     (307 )
    Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities   35,415       (2,262 )     22,753       8,089  
    CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES              
    Proceeds from stock option exercises   1,691       770       3,651       777  
    Repurchase of common stock   (1,955 )     (5,970 )     (8,398 )     (24,676 )
    Payments of withholding tax on net issuance of restricted stock         (104 )     (1,843 )     (1,241 )
    Net cash used in financing activities   (264 )     (5,304 )     (6,590 )     (25,140 )
    Net change in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash   18,596       (1,426 )     (13,100 )     24,942  
    CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASH              
    Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of the year   36,428       69,550       68,124       43,182  
    Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of the year $ 55,024     $ 68,124     $ 55,024     $ 68,124  
                   

    The following tables provide a reconciliation of cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheets that sum to the total of the same such amounts on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows:

      March 31, 2025   March 31, 2024   March 31, 2023
    Cash and cash equivalents $ 47,374     $ 60,578     $ 43,182  
    Escrow deposits   7,650       7,546        
    Total cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash $ 55,024     $ 68,124     $ 43,182  
               
          December 31, 2024   December 31, 2023
    Cash and cash equivalents     $ 28,797     $ 62,033  
    Escrow deposits       7,631       7,517  
    Total cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash     $ 36,428     $ 69,550  
               
    Anterix Inc.
    Earnings Release Tables
    Other Financial Information
    (in thousands except per share data)
                   
      Three Months Ended March 31,   Year Ended March 31,
        2025       2024       2025       2024  
    Number of shares repurchased and retired   50       173       245       736  
    Average price paid per share* $ 38.63     $ 33.80     $ 33.71     $ 33.72  
    Total cost to repurchase $ 1,955     $ 5,970     $ 8,398     $ 24,676  
    * Average price paid per share includes costs associated with the repurchases, excluding excise taxes associated with the share repurchases.
       

    As of March 31, 2025, $227.7 million is remaining under the share repurchase program.

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI: Microchip Enhances TrustMANAGER Platform to Support CRA Compliance and Cybersecurity Regulations

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    CHANDLER, Ariz., June 24, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — International cybersecurity regulations continue to adapt to meet the evolving threat landscape. One major focus is on outdated firmware in IoT devices, which can present significant security vulnerabilities. To address these challenges, Microchip Technology (Nasdaq: MCHP) is enhancing its TrustMANAGER platform to include secure code signing and Firmware Over-the-Air (FOTA) update delivery as well as remote management of firmware images, cryptographic keys and digital certificates. These advancements support compliance with the European Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) which mandates strong cybersecurity measures for digital products sold in the European Union (EU). Aligned with standards like the European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI) EN 303 645 baseline requirements of cybersecurity for consumer IoT and the International Society of Automation (ISA)/International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) 62443 security of industrial automation and control systems standards, the CRA sets a precedent that is expected to influence regulations worldwide.

    Microchip’s ECC608 TrustMANAGER leverages Kudelski IoT’s keySTREAM™ Software as a Service (SaaS) to deliver a secure authentication Integrated Circuit (IC) that is designed to store, protect and manage cryptographic keys and certificates. With the addition of FOTA services, the platform helps customers securely deploy real-time firmware updates to remotely patch vulnerabilities and comply with cybersecurity regulations.

    “As evolving cybersecurity regulations require connected device manufacturers to prioritize the implementation of mechanisms for secure firmware updates, lifecycle credential management and effective fleet deployment,” said Nuri Dagdeviren, corporate vice president of Microchip’s security products business unit. “The addition of FOTA services to Microchip’s TrustMANAGER platform offers a scalable solution that removes the need for manual, and expensive, static infrastructure security updates. FOTA updates allow customers to save resources while fulfilling compliance requirements and helping to future-proof their products against emerging threats and evolving regulations.”

    Further enhancing cybersecurity compliance, the Microchip WINCS02PC Wi-Fi® network controller module used in the TrustMANAGER development kit is now certified against the Radio Equipment Directive (RED) for secure and reliable cloud connectivity. RED establishes strict standards for radio devices in the EU, focusing on network security, data protection and fraud prevention. Beginning August 1, 2025, all wireless devices sold in the EU market must adhere to RED cybersecurity provisions.

    By incorporating these additional services, TrustMANAGER—governed by keySTREAM—tackles key challenges with IoT security, regulatory compliance, device lifecycle management and fleet management. This solution is designed to serve IoT device manufacturers and industrial automation providers. Visit the website to learn more about Microchip’s Trust Platform.

    Development Tools
    The ECC608 TrustMANAGER is compatible with the MPLAB® X Integrated Development Environment (IDE) and supported by Microchip’s CryptoAuth PRO development board (EV89U05A) and the CryptoAuthLib software library. The Trust Platform Design Suite (TPDS) contains a use case example including onboarding educational steps and a firmware code example to enable the keySTREAM service to AWS® with the ECC608 secure element running on a 32-bit Arm® Cortex®-M4-based PIC32CX SG41MCU and a WINCS02PC Wi-Fi module.  

    Pricing and Availability
    You can purchase directly from Microchip or contact a Microchip sales representative or authorized worldwide distributor.

    Resources
    High-res images available through Flickr or editorial contact (feel free to publish):

    About Microchip Technology:
    Microchip Technology Inc. is a leading provider of smart, connected and secure embedded control and processing solutions. Its easy-to-use development tools and comprehensive product portfolio enable customers to create optimal designs which reduce risk while lowering total system cost and time to market. The company’s solutions serve over 100,000 customers across the industrial, automotive, consumer, aerospace and defense, communications and computing markets. Headquartered in Chandler, Arizona, Microchip offers outstanding technical support along with dependable delivery and quality. For more information, visit the Microchip website at www.microchip.com.

    Note: The Microchip name and logo, the Microchip logo and MPLAB are registered trademarks of Microchip Technology Incorporated in the U.S.A. and other countries. All other trademarks mentioned herein are the property of their respective companies.

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI Economics: The EU’s CBAM: Implications for Member States and Trading Partners

    Source: International Monetary Fund

    Summary

    The EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) came into force on October 1, 2023, introducing reporting requirements for importers of covered products and, from 2026, an obligation to pay a fee on the carbon content of imported goods. This paper uses indices of ad valorem tariffs to assess the incidence of the EU CBAM on both EU member states and the EU’s trading partners. Overall, the direct impact on EU countries’ trade is estimated to be small, adding 0.1 percent to the value of EU imports when averaged across all imports, and 0.04 percent to the average cost of non-EU countries’ exports to the EU—with a maximum of 1.2 percent. However, effects could be sizeable for specific products such as iron, steel and aluminium, which can help explain CBAM’s political salience. Moreover, an expanded CBAM featuring full coverage of ETS sectors and a significantly higher carbon price could entail larger costs in the more distant future.

    Subject: Environment, Exports, Greenhouse gas emissions, Imports, International trade

    Keywords: Carbon Leakage, Carbon Taxation, Emissions Trading, Exports, Global, Greenhouse gas emissions, Imports, Trade Policy

    MIL OSI Economics

  • India advances carbon pricing reforms to meet climate goals

    Source: Government of India

    Source: Government of India (4)

    India is moving steadily towards establishing a comprehensive carbon pricing ecosystem aimed at meeting its climate and development commitments. With the formal adoption of the Carbon Credit Trading Scheme (CCTS) in July 2024 and increasing alignment with global carbon markets, the country is setting the stage for a structured, rate-based Emissions Trading System (ETS).

    According to the World Bank’s State and Trends of Carbon Pricing 2025 report, India has emerged as a notable player among emerging economies—alongside Brazil and Türkiye—in advancing carbon pricing frameworks and climate finance tools.

    A Transition to Rate-Based Emissions Trading

    Unlike cap-based systems where total emissions are limited, India’s ETS follows a rate-based model. Here, emissions are not capped outright, but each entity is assigned a performance benchmark to limit net emissions relative to output. This model offers greater flexibility, particularly for fast-growing economies like India, by accommodating industrial expansion while maintaining climate discipline.

    The national ETS is set to initially cover nine energy-intensive sectors, including cement, steel, and power generation. Facilities outperforming benchmark emission levels will be issued tradable Credit Certificates. The scheme thus rewards efficiency while laying the groundwork for the Indian Carbon Market (ICM).

    India’s Ministry of Power approved eight methodologies on March 28, 2025, for generating voluntary carbon credits. These include renewable energy, green hydrogen production, industrial energy efficiency, and mangrove afforestation. This move supports the broader aim of transitioning from existing schemes such as the Perform, Achieve and Trade (PAT) programme to a market-ready, credit-based system.

    Emerging Economies in Comparison

    Among peer economies, China operates a similar rate-based ETS focused on the power and heavy industrial sectors. Indonesia, too, follows a rate-based structure and has recently expanded its coverage. Brazil stands apart with a cap-based system, legislated in December 2024, covering all sectors barring agriculture. India’s carbon pricing framework is currently in the regulatory phase but is expected to become operational within the next fiscal year.

    Voluntary Carbon Market: Expanding the Scope

    India is developing a voluntary carbon market to include sectors currently outside the purview of the compliance mechanism. These encompass agriculture, afforestation, and clean cooking initiatives. The objective is to channel private capital towards climate-positive projects through transparent crediting mechanisms and market participation.

    The regulatory backbone for this voluntary market is provided by the Energy Conservation (Amendment) Act, 2022. This law empowers the central government to issue carbon credit certificates, thereby legitimising both compliance and voluntary credit markets.

    Policy Support and Institutional Framework

    Several flagship initiatives are helping fortify India’s carbon market architecture. Among them is the National Green Hydrogen Mission, which aims to produce 5 million metric tonnes of green hydrogen annually by 2030. The mission is closely tied to the carbon credit mechanism through approved methodologies that recognise hydrogen’s potential as a low-emission fuel.

    Meanwhile, the PAT scheme—implemented by the Bureau of Energy Efficiency (BEE) since 2012—has achieved a 15–25% reduction in emissions intensity in targeted sectors. It will gradually integrate with the ETS, ensuring a seamless policy transition.

    India’s renewable energy ambitions remain central to its climate policy. The government aims to install 500 GW of non-fossil fuel-based power capacity by 2030, with carbon pricing acting as a complementary instrument to accelerate this shift.

    Market Readiness and Governance

    To strengthen governance, the National Steering Committee for the Indian Carbon Market (NSCICM) has been constituted. It includes representatives from key ministries, state governments, and industry stakeholders. The Committee is responsible for setting targets, issuing guidelines, and ensuring transparency in market operations. It also oversees the development of international trading mechanisms and verifies emission intensity reductions.

    The Bureau of Energy Efficiency, functioning under the Ministry of Power, plays a pivotal role as the technical arm of India’s climate governance. Since its inception in 2002, BEE has deployed a combination of regulatory and market-based tools to drive energy efficiency across sectors such as industry, buildings, transport, and agriculture.

    Enabling Behavioural Shifts

    India’s approach also includes behavioural interventions. Launched as a global movement at COP27, Mission LiFE (Lifestyle for Environment) encourages individuals to adopt climate-friendly daily habits. The mission aims to mobilise one billion people by 2028 and transform 80% of Indian villages and urban bodies into green communities.

    Complementing this is the Green Credit Programme (GCP), which was notified in October 2023 under the Environment Protection Act, 1986. GCP promotes tree plantation on degraded forest land, issuing digital credits to participants—ranging from individuals to corporations—who maintain the plantations over a decade. The scheme is designed to expand India’s green cover and incentivise voluntary environmental stewardship.

    Towards a Carbon-Conscious Economy

    India’s carbon pricing journey is firmly grounded in the principle of Common but Differentiated Responsibilities and Respective Capabilities (CBDR-RC), ensuring that climate action remains equitable and context-specific. With institutional structures now in place and policy backing strong, the country is poised to lead by example in aligning economic development with environmental sustainability.

  • MIL-OSI: FactSet Reports Results for Third Quarter 2025

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    • Q3 GAAP revenues of $585.5 million, up 5.9% from Q3 2024.
    • Organic Q3 ASV of $2,296.9 million, up 4.5% year over year.
    • Q3 GAAP operating margin of 33.2%, down approximately 350 bps year over year, and adjusted operating margin of 36.8%, down 270 bps year over year.
    • Q3 GAAP diluted EPS of $3.87, down 5.4% from the prior year, and adjusted diluted EPS of $4.27, down 2.3% year over year.
    • FactSet appointed Sanoke Viswanathan as CEO, effective early September 2025. He succeeds Phil Snow, who will retire as CEO and Board member. Snow will remain a senior advisor through the end of the calendar year.

    NORWALK, Conn., June 23, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — FactSet (“FactSet” or the “Company”) (NYSE:FDS) (NASDAQ:FDS), a global financial digital platform and enterprise solutions provider, today announced results for its third quarter fiscal 2025 ended May 31, 2025.

    Third Quarter Fiscal 2025 Highlights

    • GAAP revenues increased 5.9%, or $32.8 million, to $585.5 million for the third quarter of fiscal 2025 compared with $552.7 million in the prior year period. Organic(1) revenues grew 4.4% year over year to $577.2 million during the third quarter of fiscal 2025. Growth in GAAP and Organic revenues this quarter was driven by wealth and institutional buy-side clients.
    • Annual Subscription Value (“ASV”) was $2,335.1 million at May 31, 2025, compared with $2,199.1 million at May 31, 2024. Organic ASV was $2,296.9 million at May 31, 2025, up 4.5% or $98.5 million year over year(2).
    • Organic ASV increased $22.6 million over the last three months. Please see the “ASV” section of this press release for details.
    • GAAP operating margin decreased to 33.2% compared with 36.6% for the prior year period. Adjusted operating margin decreased to 36.8% compared with 39.4% in the prior year period. GAAP and adjusted operating margin decreased primarily due to the lapping of both a lower bonus accrual and a one-time payroll tax adjustment that occurred in the prior year, as well as higher annual base salaries from inclusion of recent acquisitions, partially offset by growth in revenues. In addition, GAAP operating margin decreased due to higher amortization of intangible assets.
    • GAAP diluted earnings per share (“EPS”) decreased 5.4% to $3.87 compared with $4.09 for the same period in fiscal 2024. Adjusted diluted EPS decreased 2.3% to $4.27 compared with $4.37 in the prior year period. The decrease in GAAP diluted EPS and adjusted diluted EPS were mainly driven by higher operating expenses, partially offset by growth in revenues.
    • Net cash provided by operating activities was $253.8 million for the third quarter of fiscal 2025, an increase of 6.5% compared with the prior year period. Free cash flow increased to $228.6 million for the third quarter of fiscal 2025, compared with $216.9 million for the prior year period, an increase of 5.4%, primarily due to higher operating cash flows.
    • GAAP effective tax rate for the third quarter of fiscal 2025 increased to 17.5% compared with 17.0% for the third quarter of fiscal 2024. The increase was primarily due to certain discrete items, mainly lower excess tax benefits related to stock-based compensation, as well as a higher overall foreign tax rate, partially offset by lower U.S. tax on foreign earnings.

    (1) References to “organic” figures in this press release exclude the current year impact of acquisitions and dispositions completed within the past 12 months and the current year impact from changes in foreign currency.

    (2) Beginning in fiscal 2025, FactSet is reporting Organic ASV, rather than Organic ASV plus Professional Services, to focus on the recurring nature of its revenues. This underscores the shift of FactSet’s offerings toward providing more managed services and less project-based services.

    “We are pleased with our third quarter performance, which reflects the execution of our enterprise solution strategy. With a healthy pipeline and increased momentum, we are well-positioned to finish the fiscal year with strength,” said Phil Snow, CEO of FactSet. “As FactSet prepares for its next chapter of leadership, I’m proud of the solid foundation we’ve established, built on innovation, client trust, and industry-leading data and workflow solutions. This platform gives me great conviction in the Company’s continued success.”

    Key Financial Measures*

    (Condensed and Unaudited) Three Months Ended  
      May 31,  
    (In thousands, except per share data) 2025 2024 Change
    Revenues $ 585,520   $ 552,708   5.9 %
    Organic revenues $ 577,200   $ 552,708   4.4 %
    Operating income $ 194,155   $ 202,459   (4.1 )%
    Adjusted operating income $ 215,313   $ 217,960   (1.2 )%
    Operating margin   33.2 %   36.6 %  
    Adjusted operating margin   36.8 %   39.4 %  
    Net income $ 148,542   $ 158,135   (6.1 )%
    Adjusted net income $ 163,921   $ 168,796   (2.9 )%
    EBITDA $ 235,915   $ 239,930   (1.7 )%
    Diluted EPS $ 3.87   $ 4.09   (5.4 )%
    Adjusted diluted EPS $ 4.27   $ 4.37   (2.3 )%

             * See reconciliation of U.S. GAAP to adjusted key financial measures in the back of this press release.

    “As anticipated, the second half in fiscal 2025 is showing improved results, with third quarter organic ASV growth accelerating as we meet client demands and execute diligently,” said Helen Shan, FactSet’s CFO. “At the same time, we remain focused on investing in our strategic priorities and are reaffirming our fiscal 2025 guidance to achieve our full year targets.”

    Annual Subscription Value (ASV)

    ASV at any given point in time represents the forward-looking revenues for the next 12 months from all subscription services currently supplied to clients.

    ASV was $2,335.1 million at May 31, 2025, compared with $2,199.1 million at May 31, 2024. Organic ASV was $2,296.9 million at May 31, 2025, up $98.5 million from the prior year, for a growth rate of 4.5%. Organic ASV increased $22.6 million over the last three months.

    The buy-side and sell-side organic ASV annual growth rates as of May 31, 2025 were each 4.0%. Buy-side clients, including institutional asset managers, wealth managers, asset owners, partners, hedge funds and corporate clients, accounted for 82% of organic ASV. The remaining organic ASV came from sell-side firms, including broker-dealers, banking and advisory firms, and private equity and venture capital firms. Supplementary tables covering organic buy-side and sell-side ASV growth rates may be found on the last page of this press release.

    Segment Revenues and ASV

    ASV from the Americas was $1,513.1 million compared with ASV in the prior year period of $1,415.3 million. Organic ASV from the Americas increased 5.0% to $1,486.0 million. Americas revenues for the quarter increased to $380.5 million compared with $356.5 million in the third quarter of last year. The Americas quarterly organic revenues growth rate was 5.0% over the prior year period.

    ASV from EMEA was $581.9 million compared with ASV in the prior year period of $565.0 million. Organic ASV from EMEA increased 2.1% to $575.2 million. EMEA revenues were $145.7 million compared with $141.2 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2024. The EMEA quarterly organic revenues growth rate was 2.3% over the prior year period.

    ASV from Asia Pacific was $240.1 million compared with ASV in the prior year period of $218.8 million. Organic ASV from Asia Pacific increased 7.1% to $235.7 million. Asia Pacific revenues were $59.3 million compared with $55.0 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2024. The Asia Pacific quarterly organic revenues growth rate was 6.4% over the prior year period.

    Operational Highlights – Third Quarter Fiscal 2025

    • Client count as of May 31, 2025 was 8,811, a net increase of 166 clients in the past three months, driven by hedge fund, corporate and wealth management clients, and now includes clients from the LiquidityBook acquisition. The count includes clients with ASV of $10,000 and more.
    • User count was 220,496 as of May 31, 2025, a net increase of 1,355 users in the past three months, driven by an increase in wealth management users. The user count does not reflect the fiscal 2025 acquisitions.
    • Annual ASV retention was greater than 95% as of May 31, 2025. When expressed as a percentage of clients, annual retention was 91% as of May 31, 2025.
    • Employee headcount was 12,579 as of May 31, 2025, up 2.6% over the last 12 months, with the increase primarily in the sales and technology groups, mainly from the Irwin and LiquidityBook acquisitions and an increase in employees in our Centers of Excellence. FactSet’s Centers of Excellence account for approximately 67% of the Company’s employees.
    • A quarterly dividend of $41.6 million, or $1.10 per share, was paid on June 18, 2025, to holders of record of FactSet’s common stock at the close of business on May 30, 2025. This represents a 6% increase in the regular quarterly dividend from the $1.04 per share paid in the previous quarter and marks the 26th consecutive year the Company has increased dividends on a stock split-adjusted basis.
    • FactSet entered into a new credit agreement that includes a term loan of $500 million and a revolving credit facility of $1.0 billion, which remains undrawn. The term loan was used to repay borrowings under the 2022 credit agreement.
    • FactSet announced that Phil Snow will retire as CEO and a member of the Board, effective early September 2025 and will be succeeded by Sanoke Viswanathan, most recently CEO of International Consumer and Wealth at JPMorgan Chase. Snow will serve as a senior advisor through the end of the calendar year.
    • FactSet was named Databricks’ Financial Services Data Partner of the Year. FactSet data is available on the Databricks Marketplace to help clients accelerate time to value by eliminating manual data integration and enabling seamless and secure access to FactSet’s industry-leading proprietary and third-party connected data.
    • After the quarter, CUSIP Global Services announced a collaboration with Aumni, Inc., a JPMorgan company, to expand CUSIP coverage for venture-backed and private equity-owned companies. This expanded coverage provides standardized identifiers for company issuers and their financial instruments, thereby increasing efficiency, accuracy, and security in reporting, settlement, and analytics for venture capital firms, private equity firms, and their investors.

    Share Repurchase Program

    FactSet repurchased 184,050 shares of its common stock for $80.7 million at an average price of $438.45 during the third quarter of fiscal 2025 under the Company’s share repurchase program. As of May 31, 2025, $106.2 million remained available for share repurchases under this program. Additionally, on June 17, 2025, the Board of Directors of FactSet approved a new share repurchase authorization of up to $400 million, which will be available on September 1, 2025.

    Annual Business Outlook

    FactSet reaffirms its outlook for fiscal 2025 provided on March 20, 2025. The following forward-looking statements reflect FactSet’s expectations as of today’s date. Given the risk factors, uncertainties, and assumptions discussed below, actual results may differ materially. FactSet does not intend to update its forward-looking statements prior to its next quarterly results announcement.

    Fiscal 2025 Expectations

    • Organic ASV is expected to grow in the range of $100 million to $130 million during fiscal 2025.
    • GAAP revenues are expected to be in the range of $2,305 million to $2,325 million.
    • GAAP operating margin is expected to be in the range of 32.0% to 33.0%.
    • Adjusted operating margin is expected to be in the range of 36.0% to 37.0%.
    • FactSet’s annual effective tax rate is expected to be in the range of 17% to 18%.
    • GAAP diluted EPS is expected to be in the range of $14.80 to $15.40.
    • Adjusted diluted EPS is expected to be in the range of $16.80 to $17.40.

    Adjusted operating margin and adjusted diluted EPS guidance do not include certain effects of any non-recurring benefits or charges that may arise in fiscal 2025. Please see the back of this press release for a reconciliation of GAAP to adjusted metrics.

    Conference Call

    Third Quarter 2025 Conference Call Details

    Please register for the conference call using the above link before the call start time. The conference call platform will register your name and organization and provide dial-in numbers and a unique access pin. The conference call will have a live Q&A session.

    A replay will be available on the Company’s investor relations website after 1:00 p.m. Eastern Time on June 23, 2025, through June 23, 2026. The earnings call transcript will be available via FactSet CallStreet.

    Forward-looking Statements

    This press release contains forward-looking statements based on management’s current expectations, estimates, forecasts and projections about future events and circumstances, industries in which FactSet operates and the beliefs and assumptions of management. All statements that address expectations, guidance, outlook or projections about the future, including statements about the Company’s strategy for growth, product development, revenues, future financial results, anticipated growth, market position, subscriptions, expected expenditures, trends in FactSet’s business and financial results, are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements may be identified by words like “may,” “might,” “will,” “should,” “expects,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “intends,” “projects,” “indicates,” “predicts,” “potential,” or “continue,” and similar expressions. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve a number of risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Many factors, including those discussed more fully elsewhere in this release and in FactSet’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, particularly its latest annual report on Form 10-K and quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, as well as others, could cause results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. Accordingly, the Company cautions readers not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date they are made. FactSet assumes no duty to and does not undertake to update or revise any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances arising after the date on which it is made, except as required by applicable law. Future results could differ materially from historical performance.

    About Non-GAAP Financial Measures

    The Company reports its financial results in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The Company also refers to and presents certain additional non-GAAP financial measures. These measures include: organic revenues, adjusted operating margin, adjusted operating income, adjusted net income, EBITDA, adjusted diluted EPS, and free cash flow. The Company has included reconciliations of these non-GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparable financial measures calculated in accordance with GAAP at the back of this release.

    FactSet uses these non-GAAP financial measures both in presenting its results to stockholders and the investment community and in its internal evaluation and management of the business. The Company believes that these non-GAAP financial measures provide useful supplemental information to investors because they permit investors to view the Company’s performance using the same tools that management uses to gauge progress in achieving its goals. Investors may benefit from referring to these non-GAAP financial measures in assessing the Company’s performance and when planning, forecasting and analyzing future periods, and such measures may also facilitate comparisons to historical performance. The Company believes that organic revenues, adjusted operating margin, adjusted operating income, adjusted net income, EBITDA, and adjusted diluted EPS help to fully reflect the underlying economic performance of FactSet. The Company believes that free cash flow is useful to investors because it is an indication of cash flow that may be available to fund investments in future growth initiatives. The presentation of this non-GAAP financial information should not be considered in isolation from, or as a substitute for, the financial information prepared and presented in accordance with GAAP. We are not able to reconcile certain forward-looking non-GAAP measures to reported measures without unreasonable efforts because it is not possible to predict with a reasonable degree of certainty the actual impact or exact timing of items that may impact comparability.

    About FactSet

    FactSet (NYSE:FDS | NASDAQ:FDS) supercharges financial intelligence, offering enterprise data and information solutions that power our clients to maximize their potential. Our cutting-edge digital platform seamlessly integrates proprietary financial data, client datasets, third-party sources, and flexible technology to deliver tailored solutions across the buy-side, sell-side, wealth management, private equity, and corporate sectors. With over 47 years of expertise, a presence in 20 countries, and extensive multi-asset class coverage, we leverage advanced data connectivity alongside AI and next-generation tools to streamline workflows, drive productivity, and enable smarter, faster decision-making. Serving more than 8,800 global clients and over 220,000 individual users, FactSet is a member of the S&P 500 dedicated to innovation and long-term client success. Learn more at www.factset.com and follow us on X and LinkedIn.

    Investor Relations:                         
    Kevin Toomey
    +1.212.209.5259
    Kevin.Toomey@factset.com

    Media Relations:
    Kelsey Goldsmith
    +1.207.712.9726
    Kelsey.Goldsmith@factset.com

                 
    Consolidated Statements of Income (Unaudited)            
      Three Months Ended   Nine Months Ended
      May 31,   May 31,
    (In thousands, except per share data) 2025   2024   2025   2024
    Revenues $ 585,520     $ 552,708     $ 1,724,847     $ 1,640,869  
    Operating expenses              
    Cost of services   280,729       246,986       809,112       753,749  
    Selling, general and administrative   110,636       103,263       344,753       313,679  
    Total operating expenses   391,365       350,249       1,153,865       1,067,428  
                   
    Operating income   194,155       202,459       570,982       573,441  
                   
    Other income (expense), net              
    Interest income   1,509       4,568       4,483       10,427  
    Interest expense   (15,122 )     (16,894 )     (43,438 )     (50,231 )
    Other income (expense), net   (594 )     399       (20 )     736  
    Total other income (expense), net   (14,207 )     (11,927 )     (38,975 )     (39,068 )
                   
    Income before income taxes   179,948       190,532       532,007       534,373  
                   
    Provision for income taxes   31,406       32,397       88,583       86,743  
    Net income $ 148,542     $ 158,135     $ 443,424     $ 447,630  
                   
    Basic earnings per common share $ 3.92     $ 4.15     $ 11.68     $ 11.76  
    Diluted earnings per common share $ 3.87     $ 4.09     $ 11.53     $ 11.58  
                   
    Basic weighted average common shares   37,907       38,089       37,976       38,069  
    Diluted weighted average common shares   38,344       38,640       38,457       38,644  

    Certain prior year figures have been conformed to the current year’s presentation.

       
    Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)  
         
         
    (In thousands) May 31, 2025   August 31, 2024
    ASSETS          
    Cash and cash equivalents $ 356,361     $ 422,979  
    Investments   7,684       69,619  
    Accounts receivable, net of reserves of $13,917 at May 31, 2025 and $14,581 at August 31, 2024   271,851       228,054  
    Prepaid taxes   61,048       55,103  
    Prepaid expenses and other current assets   63,534       60,093  
    Total current assets   760,478       835,848  
         
    Property, equipment and leasehold improvements, net   79,627       82,513  
    Goodwill   1,277,855       1,011,129  
    Intangible assets, net   1,931,210       1,844,141  
    Deferred taxes   66,870       61,337  
    Lease right-of-use assets, net   119,191       130,494  
    Other assets   103,531       89,578  
    TOTAL ASSETS $ 4,338,762     $ 4,055,040  
         
    LIABILITIES    
    Accounts payable and accrued expenses $ 144,487     $ 178,250  
    Current debt         124,842  
    Current lease liabilities   33,219       31,073  
    Accrued compensation   98,131       93,279  
    Deferred revenues   170,897       159,761  
    Current taxes payable   30,545       40,391  
    Dividends payable   41,644       39,470  
    Total current liabilities   518,923       667,066  
         
    Long-term debt   1,430,197       1,241,131  
    Deferred taxes   16,573       8,452  
    Deferred revenues, non-current   312       1,344  
    Taxes payable   48,072       40,452  
    Long-term lease liabilities   157,088       177,521  
    Other liabilities   12,415       6,614  
    TOTAL LIABILITIES $ 2,183,580     $ 2,142,580  
         
    STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY    
    TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY $ 2,155,182     $ 1,912,460  
         
    TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY $ 4,338,762     $ 4,055,040  
                   
    Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)  
      Nine Months Ended
      May 31,
    (In thousands) 2025   2024
    CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES              
    Net income $ 443,424     $ 447,630  
    Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities    
    Depreciation and amortization   114,972       91,154  
    Amortization of lease right-of-use assets   23,152       22,846  
    Stock-based compensation expense   47,154       46,707  
    Deferred income taxes   3,154       (6,979 )
    Other, net   7,428       7,831  
    Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effects of acquisitions    
    Accounts receivable   (41,492 )     (7,176 )
    Prepaid expenses and other assets   6,699       (14,941 )
    Accounts payable and accrued expenses   (49,717 )     17,296  
    Accrued compensation   3,789       (33,329 )
    Deferred revenues   4,955       13,817  
    Taxes payable, net of prepaid taxes   (19,108 )     (15,992 )
    Lease liabilities, net   (30,250 )     (31,687 )
    Net cash provided by operating activities   514,160       537,177  
         
    CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES    
    Purchases of property, equipment, leasehold improvements and capitalized internal-use software   (74,840 )     (59,722 )
    Acquisition of businesses, net of cash and cash equivalents acquired   (348,255 )      
    Purchases of investments   (4,433 )     (44,936 )
    Proceeds from maturity or sale of investments   58,155        
    Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities   (369,373 )     (104,658 )
         
    CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES    
    Proceeds from debt   803,410        
    Repayments of debt   (742,500 )     (187,500 )
    Dividend payments   (118,329 )     (111,297 )
    Proceeds from employee stock plans   72,616       83,497  
    Repurchases of common stock   (193,838 )     (171,918 )
    Other financing activities   (20,686 )     (15,690 )
    Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities   (199,327 )     (402,908 )
         
    Effect of exchange rate changes on cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash   1,966       (1,911 )
    Net increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash   (52,574 )     27,700  
    Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period   422,979       425,444  
    Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period $ 370,405     $ 453,144  
         
    Reconciliation of total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash:    
    Cash and cash equivalents $ 356,361     $ 453,144  
    Restricted cash included in Prepaid expenses and other current assets   6,522        
    Restricted cash included in Other assets   7,522        
    Total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash $ 370,405     $ 453,144  

    Certain prior year figures have been conformed to the current year’s presentation.

    Reconciliation of U.S. GAAP Results to Adjusted Financial Measures

    Organic Revenues

    Organic revenues exclude the current year impact of revenues from acquisitions and dispositions completed within the past 12 months and the current year impact from changes in foreign currency. The table below provides a reconciliation of revenues to organic revenues:

                       
    (Unaudited) Three Months Ended    
      May 31,    
    (In thousands) 2025   2024   Change
    Revenues $ 585,520     $ 552,708       5.9 %
    Acquisition revenues   (7,781 )          
    Currency impact   (539 )          
    Organic revenues $ 577,200     $ 552,708       4.4 %
                           

    Non-GAAP Financial Measures

    The table below provides a reconciliation of operating income, operating margin, net income and diluted EPS to adjusted operating income, adjusted operating margin, adjusted net income, EBITDA, and adjusted diluted EPS.

    Adjusted operating income and margin, adjusted net income, and adjusted diluted earnings per share exclude acquisition-related intangible asset amortization and non-recurring items. EBITDA represents earnings before interest expense, provision for income taxes and depreciation and amortization expense.

               
      Three Months Ended        
      May 31,        
    (in thousands, except per share data) 2025   2024   % Change
    Operating income $ 194,155     $ 202,459       (4.1 )%
    Intangible asset amortization   19,182       16,674          
    Business acquisitions and related costs   1,976       423          
    Restructuring/severance         (1,596 )        
    Adjusted operating income $ 215,313     $ 217,960       (1.2 )%
    Operating margin   33.2 %     36.6 %        
    Adjusted operating margin(1)   36.8 %     39.4 %        
    Net income $ 148,542     $ 158,135       (6.1 )%
    Intangible asset amortization   13,943       11,466          
    Business acquisitions and related costs   1,436       291          
    Restructuring/severance         (1,096 )        
    Adjusted net income(2) $ 163,921     $ 168,796       (2.9 )%
    Net income   148,542       158,135       (6.1 )%
    Interest expense   15,122       16,894          
    Income taxes   31,406       32,397          
    Depreciation and amortization expense   40,845       32,504          
    EBITDA $ 235,915     $ 239,930       (1.7 )%
    Diluted EPS $ 3.87     $ 4.09       (5.4 )%
    Intangible asset amortization   0.36       0.30          
    Business acquisitions and related costs   0.04       0.01          
    Restructuring/severance         (0.03 )        
    Adjusted diluted EPS(2) $ 4.27     $ 4.37       (2.3 )%
    Weighted average common shares (diluted)   38,344       38,640          
    (1) Adjusted operating margin is calculated as Adjusted operating income divided by Revenues.
    (2) For purposes of calculating Adjusted net income and Adjusted diluted EPS, all adjustments for the three months ended May 31, 2025 and May 31, 2024 were taxed at an adjusted tax rate of 27.3% and 31.2%, respectively.
       

    Business Outlook Operating Margin, Net Income and Diluted EPS

    (Unaudited)    
    Figures may not foot due to rounding Annual Fiscal 2025 Guidance
    (In millions, except per share data) Low end of range   High end of range
    Revenues $ 2,305     $ 2,325  
    Operating income $ 761     $ 744  
    Operating margin   33.0 %     32.0 %
         
    Intangible asset amortization   80       81  
    Other adjustments (net)   12       12  
    Adjusted operating income $ 853     $ 837  
    Adjusted operating margin(a)   37.0 %     36.0 %
         
    Net income $ 588     $ 567  
    Intangible asset amortization   66       66  
    Other adjustments (net)   10       10  
    Discrete tax items   (4 )     (4 )
    Adjusted net income $ 660     $ 640  
         
    Diluted earnings per common share $ 15.40     $ 14.80  
    Intangible asset amortization   1.73       1.73  
    Other adjustments (net)   0.30       0.30  
    Discrete tax items   (0.03 )     (0.03 )
    Adjusted diluted earnings per common share $ 17.40     $ 16.80  
    (a) Adjusted operating margin is calculated as Adjusted operating income divided by Revenues.
       

    Free Cash Flow

    Cash flows provided by operating activities have been reduced by purchases of property, equipment, leasehold improvements and capitalized internal-use software to report non-GAAP free cash flow.

         
    (Unaudited) Three Months Ended  
      May 31,  
    (In thousands) 2025   2024   Change
    Net Cash Provided for Operating Activities $ 253,833     $ 238,235       6.5 %
    Less: purchases of property, equipment, leasehold improvements and capitalized internal-use software   (25,230 )     (21,339 )  
    Free Cash Flow $ 228,603     $ 216,896       5.4 %
                           

    Supplementary Schedules of Historical ASV by Client Type

    The following table presents the percentages and growth rates of organic ASV by client type, excluding the impact of currency movements, and may be useful to facilitate historical comparisons. Organic ASV excludes acquisitions and dispositions completed within the last 12 months and the effects of foreign currency movements.

    The numbers below do not include professional services or issuer fees.

                     
      Q3’25 Q2’25 Q1’25 Q4’24 Q3’24 Q2’24 Q1’24 Q4’23
    % of ASV from buy-side clients 82.3% 82.3% 82.1% 82.0% 82.3% 82.0% 82.0% 81.8%
    % of ASV from sell-side clients 17.7% 17.7% 17.9% 18.0% 17.7% 18.0% 18.0% 18.2%
                     
    ASV Growth rate from buy-side clients 4.0% 4.1% 4.3% 4.9% 5.3% 5.6% 7.2% 6.9%
    ASV Growth rate from sell-side clients 4.0% 2.2% 3.5% 3.8% 3.7% 5.5% 7.6% 9.3%
                     

    The following table presents the calculation of organic ASV.

       
    (In millions) As of May 31, 2025
    As reported ASV $ 2,335.1  
    Currency impact (a)   (5.7 )
    Acquisition ASV (b)   (32.5 )
    Organic ASV $ 2,296.9  
    Organic ASV annual growth rate   4.5 %
    (a) The impact from foreign currency movements.
       
    (b) Acquired ASV from acquisitions completed within the last 12 months.

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI USA News: WHAT THEY ARE SAYING: President Trump’s Display of Peace Through Strength

    Source: US Whitehouse

    President Donald J. Trump’s bold, decisive action against Iran — the world’s leading state sponsor of terrorism — and its key nuclear facilities was met with bipartisan praise from lawmakers across Capitol Hill.

    Here’s what they’re saying:

    Speaker Mike Johnson: “The President made the right call, and did what he needed to do. Leaders in Congress were aware of the urgency of this situation and the Commander-in-Chief evaluated that the imminent danger outweighed the time it would take for Congress to act. The world’s largest state sponsor of terrorism, which chants ‘Death to America,’ simply could not be allowed the opportunity to obtain and use nuclear weapons. The President fully respects the Article I power of Congress, and tonight’s necessary, limited, and targeted strike follows the history and tradition of similar military actions under presidents of both parties.”

    Senate Majority Leader John Thune: “The regime in Iran, which has committed itself to bringing ‘death to America’ and wiping Israel off the map, has rejected all diplomatic pathways to peace. The mullahs’ misguided pursuit of nuclear weapons must be stopped. As we take action tonight to ensure a nuclear weapon remains out of reach for Iran, I stand with President Trump and pray for the American troops and personnel in harm’s way.”

    Senate Majority Whip John Barrasso: “President @realDonaldTrump’s decision to strike Iran’s nuclear program is the right one. The greatest threat to the safety of the United States and the world is Iran with a nuclear weapon. God Bless our troops”

    Senate Republican Conference Chair Tom Cotton: “Iran has waged a war of terror against the United States for 46 years. We could never allow Iran to get nuclear weapons. God bless our brave troops. President Trump made the right call and the ayatollahs should recall his warning not to target Americans.”

    Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chair Jim Risch: “As President Trump has said over and over again – as have I – Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon. Why? A nuclear-armed Iran would without doubt spark a nuclear arms race that would take off around the world. This is a direct threat to American national security if left unchecked. This war is Israel’s war not our war, but Israel is one of our strongest allies and is disarming Iran for the good of the world. I’ve also always said that Israel would not allow Iran to have a nuclear weapon. For Israel this is existential. The Iranians literally want to wipe Israel and all Jews off the face of the earth. This strike will put an end to those ambitions. President Trump took decisive action today to assist the Israelis in their efforts to stop the Iranian nuclear program. Only American weapons could do what has been done. This has made America safer, in addition to the Israelis, and the world more broadly. This is not the start of a forever war. There will not be American boots on the ground in Iran. This was a precise, limited strike, which was necessary and by all accounts was very successful. As President Trump has stated, now is the time for peace.”

    Sen. Jim Banks: “I trust President Trump!”

    Sen. Marsha Blackburn: “@realDonaldTrump knows peace can only be achieved through strength. This is a victory for the United States.”

    Sen. Katie Britt: “I stand by President Trump. Strong and surgical. Please pray for peace.”

    Sen. Ted Budd: “Tonight, the United States dealt a decisive blow to Iran’s nuclear program. The U.S. military alone had the capability to destroy these facilities deep underground, and I commend President Trump for standing with our Israeli allies in their efforts to end the threat of a nuclear Iran once and for all. May God bless and protect our troops, who continue to keep us safe around the world.”

    Sen. Bill Cassidy: “Iran’s nuclear program is a threat to peace and stability. Peace must remain the goal.”

    Sen. John Cornyn: “President Trump made the courageous and correct decision to eliminate the Iranian nuclear threat. God Bless the USA. Thank you to our extraordinary military and our indomitable @POTUS This is what leadership on the world stage looks like.”

    Sen. Kevin Cramer: “When only we can do what needs doing, we must do it. Great call Mr. President and great job @usairforce ! God Bless The USA! #PeaceThroughStrength #GodBlessIsrael.”

    Sen. Ted Cruz: “I commend our pilots and servicemembers, our intelligence personnel, and his national security staff on tonight’s successful and critical operation. The prospect of the Iranian regime acquiring nuclear weapons represents the most acute immediate threat to America and our allies. When the Ayatollah chants ‘Death to America’ he means it, and the reason he is building nuclear weapons is because he intends to use them. President Trump has consistently and unequivocally stated that those threats cannot be countered without dismantling the Iranian regime’s enrichment capacity. The President and his negotiators spent two months exploring whether the regime would agree to a negotiated settlement that met America’s national security needs. At the end of that period, Iranian regime officials declared that instead of agreeing to deal they would open a new enrichment facility and install more advanced centrifuges. After that declaration, our Israeli allies launched a preemptive attack against the regime and its nuclear infrastructure, which was enormously successful. It could not disable the nuclear activities at Fordow, an underground enrichment bunker built into a mountain which was legitimized by the Obama-era deal. As long as Iran was able to access and enrich uranium, they could still rush to build a nuclear arsenal. Tonight’s actions have gone far in foreclosing that possibility, and countering the apocalyptic threat posed by an Iranian nuclear arsenal.”

    Sen. John Curtis: “Iran’s relentless pursuit of nuclear weapons is a direct threat to American interests, our allies, and global stability. Today’s action was a serious and necessary response to that danger. I honor the brave servicemembers who carried out the mission with skill and courage. Strength paired with genuine diplomacy is how we create peace, prevent conflict, and preserve freedom. I join the President in calling for a return to diplomacy.”

    Sen. Steve Daines: “Thank you President Trump and the men and women of our armed forces. America, Israel and the rest of the world are safer tonight as a result of your bravery, courage and unrivaled skill. Iran is the world’s largest state sponsor of terror, has killed hundreds of U.S. service members, attempted to assassinate President Trump, and calls the United States ‘big Satan’ and Israel ‘little Satan.’ Stopping Iran’s pursuit of nuclear weapons is a major step toward achieving peace.”

    Sen. Joni Ernst: “By leading with peace through strength, President Trump is making the world a safer place and protecting Americans. Iran must never be able to threaten America with a nuclear weapon. God bless our commander in chief and our servicemembers!”

    Sen. Deb Fischer: “For decades, Iran has chanted ‘death to America’ and pledged to wipe Israel off the map. When foreign adversaries pledge to destroy us, we should believe them. President Trump has always been clear: Iran must never obtain a nuclear weapon – and I agree. Today, his administration took the necessary steps to keep a nuclear weapon out of Iran’s reach, and I am grateful to the service members who successfully carried out the mission.”

    Sen. Bill Hagerty: “@POTUS’s decisive leadership enforced deadlines and redlines. This was a tough decision, one that, as always, President Trump put the interests of the American people first in making. May this be the end of Iran’s nuclear weapon ambitions and lay the groundwork for lasting peace.”

    Sen. Lindsey Graham: “Good. This was the right call. The regime deserves it. Well done, President @realDonaldTrump To my fellow citizens: We have the best Air Force in the world. It makes me so proud. Fly, Fight, Win.”

    Sen. Chuck Grassley: “Our commander in chief & brave military forces hv carried out a mission in Iran to prevent nuclear enrichment Iran believes in “Death to Israel Death to America” Keeping USA safe is number 1 responsibility of Pres Trump”

    Sen. John Fetterman: “As I’ve long maintained, this was the correct move by @POTUS. Iran is the world’s leading sponsor of terrorism and cannot have nuclear capabilities. I’m grateful for and salute the finest military in the world.”

    Sen. James Lankford: “I continue to be grateful for the skill and professionalism of our United States service members. Cindy and I are praying for our military, the President and for a lasting peace.”

    Sen. Mike Lee: “Tonight, the Iranian nuclear program was wiped out. Please join me in praying for the safety of the brave men and women of America’s armed forces in the Middle East and around the world, and that these strikes may lead to the lasting peace called for by President Trump.”

    Sen. Roger Marshall: “Thank you to our brave American Air Force and their successful mission as no Americans were harmed. We stand tall with President Trump who is protecting the world from a nuclear capable Iran.”

    Sen. Dave McCormick: “As I have said all along, Iran must not have a nuclear weapon. This targeted attack on Iran’s nuclear facilities is the result of the Iranian regime’s failure to make a deal despite months of President Trump’s good faith efforts to negotiate. I applaud President Trump’s strong leadership and his continued commitment to peace through strength. Once again, America’s detractors around the world should know President Trump means what he says. And I am so grateful for America’s brave warriors, who appear to have achieved their mission successfully and are returning home safely. I look forward to being briefed along with my Senate colleagues on this action.  This is an important step toward ensuring that the world’s largest state sponsor of terror never obtains a nuclear weapon.”

    Sen. Ashley Moody: “This is a solemn and important moment for security and peace. We stand with and pray for our President, the service members who carried out this mission, and the people affected by this conflict.”

    Sen. Markwayne Mullin: “To those concerned about U.S. involvement— this isn’t a “forever war” in fact, it’s ending one. @POTUS was clear: Iran must never have a nuclear weapon. The Republican-led @SenateGOP trusts President Trump to keep America safe, free, and prosperous. Peace through strength.”

    Sen. Pete Ricketts: “President Trump gave Iran ample time to come to the negotiating table on its nuclear program. Tonight’s strikes mean Iran is further from possessing a nuclear weapon. I’m thankful for the heroes who carried out this strike and for our service members in the Middle East and around the world.”

    Sen. Rick Scott: “Thank you, @POTUS, @SecDef, and our brave American warriors for a successful strike on three Iranian nuclear sites. This is what peace through strength looks like. The United States and the world are a safer place without Iran possessing a nuclear weapon.”

    Sen. Tim Scott: “Decisive American leadership. Americans and the world can thank President Trump for his courage to lead.”

    Sen. Tim Sheehy: “The right decision. Iran had every opportunity to give up their nukes. To the naysayers out there, this isn’t starting a war, this is ending one. Iran has been at war with America for 46 years. The Iranian people should rise up and put an end to this murderous regime.”

    Sen. Dan Sullivan: “President Trump meant what he said—Iran will never get a nuclear bomb. I commend @POTUS and his national security team for making this important but difficult decision and our brave military members for carrying it out. The terrorist leaders of Iran have, in essence, been at war with the United States for decades—targeting, wounding and killing thousands of American service members for years. Making sure the world’s largest state sponsor of terrorism never gets a nuclear weapon is part of the work of reestablishing deterrence against Iran, which was lost during the appeasement of the Biden Administration. This is difficult work, but critical for our national security. I fully support the President and his national security team in these critical efforts.”

    Sen. Thom Tillis: “This was the right decision by @POTUS: we cannot allow Iran to build nuclear weapons. God Bless our brave servicemembers who supported and executed this mission.”

    Sen. Tommy Tuberville: “God bless our Troops. God bless President Trump. And may God continue to bless the United States of America.”

    Sen. Roger Wicker: “Our commander-in-chief has made a deliberate —and correct— decision to eliminate the existential threat posed by the Iranian regime. We now have very serious choices ahead to provide security for our citizens and our allies and stability for the middle-east. Well-done to our military personnel. You’re the best!”

    Sen. Todd Young: “Thank you to our brave service members who executed this mission. The world will be safer if Iran’s nuclear capability is destroyed. I look forward to briefings in the coming days.”

    House Majority Whip Tom Emmer: “A nuclear Iran posed a threat to the Middle East and to the world. @POTUS has been consistent that this dangerous regime should NEVER possess a nuclear weapon. He was right then, and he is right today: NOW IS THE TIME FOR PEACE.”

    House Republican Conference Chair Lisa McClain: “President Trump is delivering PEACE THROUGH STRENGTH. Today’s successful mission destroyed Iran’s nuclear capabilities, protected American lives, and will make the world safer. Now, it’s time for peace.  God bless America and our warfighters!”

    Rep. Robert Aderholt: “I fully support President Trump’s decision to take out Iran’s nuclear facilities. As I have said, I believe that if Iran gets a functioning nuclear weapon they would not hesitate to use it against Israel or the United States. When they say death to Israel and death to America, we have no reason not to believe them. I pray this action has made the world safer. President Trump has pledged to get us out of “forever wars.” This could be a step toward ending the war we have been in with Iran since 1979. They have killed hundreds and hundreds of Americans in the past half century.”

    Rep. Mark Alford: “PEACE THROUGH STRENGTH REQUIRES STRENGTH We strongly support President Trump’s targeted strikes against Iranian nuclear facilities. The Ayatollah must never be allowed to obtain a nuclear weapon and we will always stand with Israel.”

    Rep. Don Bacon: “Iran with a nuclear weapon is an existential threat. Pres. Trump is protecting America.”

    Rep. Troy Balderson: “Thank you @realDonaldTrump for taking decisive action. The world is a whole lot safer tonight.”

    Rep. Michael Baumgartner: “There is no greater threat to the world than nuclear proliferation, let alone from a regime that has consistently used radical Islamic terrorists to attack and kill Americans for nearly 4 decades. I fully support President Trump’s decision to bomb Iran’s nuke reactor. Trump gave Iran a choice. The Ayatollah chose poorly.”

    Rep. Andy Barr: “God Bless Donald J. Trump, God Bless our military, and God Bless the United States of America! America thanks you, @realdonaldtrump! The world thanks you too.”

    Rep. Tom Barrett: “I anticipate a full briefing of our military strike in Iran immediately upon my return to Washington. Tonight, I am praying for wisdom in our decisions, President Trump and his team, and the safety of our troops. God bless the United States of America.” 

    Rep. Aarron Bean: “The rogue Iranian regime has murdered American soldiers and been the world’s leading sponsor of terrorism for decades. Peace through strength is a strategy that works. God bless our brave American troops and God bless the USA!”

    Rep. Mike Bost: “I trust that President Trump made the decision to target Iran’s nuclear program tonight due to intelligence that indicates the regime was within reach of developing nuclear weapons that could threaten the lives of American citizens and U.S. troops stationed across the globe. He showed the strength to ensure that never happens.”

    Rep. Ken Calvert: “Like President Trump, I have consistently said Iran cannot be allowed to obtain a nuclear weapon. I support his decision to use the force and precision of the U.S. military in coordination with our ally Israel to uphold this redline with tonight’s targeted strike.”

    Rep. Buddy Carter: “I support President Trump. Peace through strength!  Thank you to the brave troops who defended us and our ally, Israel.”

    Rep. Mike Collins: “Peace through strength. Thank God we have President Trump as Commander in Chief.”

    Rep. Jeff Crank: “Tonight, President Trump took decisive action to stop Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon, protect Americans and build peace in the Middle East.  Congratulations to the Department of Defense on a successful mission.”

    Rep. Rick Crawford: “As I have said multiple times recently, I regret that Iran has brought the world to this point. That said, I am thankful President Trump understood that the red line—articulated by Presidents of both parties for decades—was real. The United States and our allies, including Israel, are making it clear that the world would never accept Iran’s development of a nuclear weapon. I have been in touch with the White House before this action and will continue to track developments closely with them in the coming days. I commend President Trump for taking decisive action and I am grateful to the U.S. servicemembers who carried out these precise and successful strikes. I continue to pray for the safety of the forces engaged to protect the free world.”

    Rep. Dan Crenshaw: “Support President Trump. You think these decisions were easy? They weren’t. You think this means WW3? You’re wrong. You think it means American soldiers deploying to Iran? You’re wrong. You think it means long term stability in the Middle East and a safer future for Americans? You’re right. Because the regime that wanted ‘Death to the Great Satan’ is at its end.  Support the President.”

    Rep. Scott DesJarlais: “I stand with President Trump’s decision to take out the last of Iran’s nuclear sites and his call for peace. My full statement & the DOJ indictment on Iran’s attempt to assassinate Trump.”

    Rep. Mario Diaz-Balart: “I stand with our Commander-in-Chief President @realDonaldTrump in making sure the terrorist regime in Iran never gets a nuclear weapon. Proud of our exceptional military and proud to stand by our ally Israel.”

    Rep. Neal Dunn: “Iran’s nuclear ambitions are a threat not just to Israel but also to all our allies and the entire free world. The Ayatollah’s regime forced the President’s hand. It was imperative that President Trump act decisively to eliminate that existential threat. Prayers for the Iranian people and peace in the Middle East.”

    Rep. Gabe Evans: “I’m glad to see @POTUS take action to prevent Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon. As a veteran of a Global War on Terror, I know we achieve peace through strength. Prayers and thanks to our brave men and women who carried out this necessary operation.”

    Rep. Pat Fallon: “President Trump today made the tough, but absolutely correct decision in the best interest of America’s national security to order strikes on Iran’s nuclear sites. Let me be clear — Iran cannot possess nuclear weapons under any circumstances. Thank you to our brave servicemembers for getting the job done.”

    Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick: “Tonight, the United States executed a successful strike on Iran’s nuclear sites at Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan. All our aircraft are safely out of Iranian airspace and headed home. This was the right call—and a necessary one. Make no mistake: a nuclear Iran is an existential threat—not just to Israel, but to the entire free world. Peace through strength is how we lead. And tonight, the greatest military on Earth delivered —for America, for our allies, and for the cause of global security. God bless our Troops. God bless America. And God Bless the enduring cause of liberty, now and forever.”

    Rep. Chuck Fleischmann: “President Trump is showing strong leadership that will protect America and the entire world by ensuring Iran never acquires a nuclear weapon. Iran is the world’s largest state-sponsor of terrorism, responsible for the murder of thousands globally. The Iranian regime must NEVER have access to nuclear weapons. I applaud President Trump for his steadfast leadership as our Commander in Chief and our outstanding Armed Forces for their successful mission.”

    Rep. Mike Flood: “Tonight, President Trump took bold steps to ensure that Iran never obtains a nuclear weapon. Keeping Iran from becoming a nuclear power will not only help keep America safe but can provide peace and stability around the world.  Thank you to our brave service members who skillfully carried out this mission.”

    Rep. Vince Fong: “President Trump’s decisive action to eliminate the nuclear capabilities posed by the Iranian regime was a necessary one to prevent a real and catastrophic threat. Iran can NEVER be allowed to have a nuclear weapon. We’re grateful for the bravery of the @usairforce and all our military personnel. May God protect them and all Americans in harm’s way as we continue the necessary work to preserve peace and stability.”

    Rep. Russell Fry: “I stand with President Trump—Iran CANNOT have a nuclear weapon. Peace through strength.”

    Rep. Brandon Gill: “’Peace through strength’ means ensuring our existential enemies don’t acquire the most lethal and catastrophic weapons known to man.”

    Rep. Carlos Gimenez: “God bless America! God bless the Jewish State of Israel! God bless President Donald J. Trump! The people of #Iran will soon taste freedom again, Israel will be at peace, & democracy will be safe from this radical Islamist terrorist regime!”

    Rep. Lance Gooden: “PEACE THROUGH STRENGTH! Thank you, Mr. President, and our great military! And thanks, especially, to God, for our pilots’ safe return.”

    Rep. Mark Green: “The United States has given Tehran every opportunity to forgo its nuclear ambitions; it has repeatedly refused. President Trump made the right decision. A nuclear armed Iran would be detrimental to the existence of our ally Israel, the stability of the Middle East, and our own national security.”

    Rep. Abe Hamadeh: “Iran has limited internet access. The news of Trump’s successful military operation should be spread far and wide in Iran, DROP LEAFLETS. The Iranian people need to know how weak the regime truly is, and now is their time to chart their own destiny if they choose.”

    Rep. Mike Haridopolos: “I support the actions taken by President Trump to end Iran’s nuclear ambitions. The world is a much safer place due to his actions taken today.”

    Rep. Pat Harrigan: “President Trump gave Iran a diplomatic off-ramp—60 days to deescalate and come to the table. They kept enriching uranium, kept making threats, and ignored every warning, including the one not to target Americans. We tried peace through strength. With American lives at risk, I support @POTUS’s actions to advance peace in the Middle East.”

    Rep. Andy Harris: “A nuclear-armed Iran endangers America, Israel, and the entire free world. The U.S. took decisive action to destroy Iran’s nuclear capability, protecting American lives, our allies, and global stability. This is peace through strength.

    Rep. Mark Harris: “I am grateful for President Trump’s thoughtful and wise approach that has gone into the decision and action which has been carried out this evening in a determined approach to make certain Iran does not have a nuclear weapon!! Pray for our nation’s military, the most powerful courageous fighting force in the world!!”

    Rep. Diana Harshbarger: “President Trump has tried over and over again to come to a peaceful agreement with Iran, but they have refused to work with us. While I believe war should never be an option, I am proud of President Trump and our military on a successful operation to deter the spread of war in the Middle East.”

    Rep. Ashley Hinson: “Thanks to President Trump’s decisive leadership, our military carried out successful strikes on Iran’s nuclear sites tonight. Iran is the largest state sponsor of terrorism & President Trump made it clear: Iran can never have a path to a nuclear weapon. Now they won’t. Thank you to our brave warriors who carried out these attacks & are now on their way back safely home. God Bless President Trump and the USA.”

    Rep. Richard Hudson: “President Donald Trump has been consistent and resolute that Iran- the world’s leading sponsor of terrorism- will not be allowed to build a nuclear weapons capability. He negotiated in good faith and offered Iran peace in exchange for ending their nuclear ambition. Iran did not take President Trump seriously and they have learned tonight that was a mistake. It would be another mistake for Iran to retaliate against Americans anywhere in the world. I support President Trump, I stand with Israel and I pray for the safety of our brave men and women in uniform around the world. America leads with resolve, and the world is safer when we do.”

    Rep. Bill Huizenga: “After attempting to negotiate peace through diplomacy, President Trump took decisive action. We must ensure that Iran does not obtain a nuclear weapon and usher in a new age of nuclear terrorism. I commend the men and women of our Armed Forces for their performance in this operation to make the world a safer place. It is now time for Iran to come to the table and abandon its nuclear ambitions.”

    Rep. Wesley Hunt: “When faced with a clear choice between peace and violence, Iran chose violence. That was a grave mistake. Underestimating the resolve of the United States, the leadership of President Trump, and the unmatched strength of the most advanced military force on Earth is not just unwise, it’s fatal. I commend our Commander-in-Chief for acting decisively to dismantle Iran’s nuclear ambitions at the source. This was not just a mission of military precision, it was a message: the United States will not tolerate threats to our national security or to global stability. To the brave men and women of our Armed Forces who carried out this operation with courage and excellence, thank you. The nation stands in awe of your service.”

    Rep. Jeff Hurd: “Iran cannot be allowed to possess nuclear capabilities. We must always stand up for the safety and security of the U.S. and its allies. I fully support actions taken to prevent an evil regime from being able to harm us, Israel, and our other allies.”

    Rep. Darrell Issa: “Tonight, @realDonaldTrump is showing the world the true meaning of peace through strength. And American strength is making peace with Iran possible for the first time in 46 years.”

    Rep. Brian Jack: “I stand with our brave military stationed across the world and President Trump, our Commander in Chief.”

    Rep. Ronny Jackson: “President Trump once again demonstrated the bold, decisive leadership the American people elected him for. He has long maintained that Iran must NEVER obtain a nuclear weapon and he kept that promise. A nuclear Iran is a direct threat to America and our allies. Tonight, the world is safer because OUR COMMANDER IN CHIEF, PRESIDENT TRUMP acted. Thank you President Trump and the servicemembers who carried out the strike. GOD BLESS THE USA!!!”

    Rep. Jim Jordan: “God Bless the United States Military. God Bless President Trump.”

    Rep. Tom Kean: “The world is a far safer place without Iranian nuclear sites. Thank you to President Trump and our second-to-none American military for carrying out this successful series of strikes. It is time for security and peace for all.”

    Rep. Jen Kiggans: “The American military remains the greatest in the world … God bless our troops. I support President Trump’s decision to bomb the three sites in Iran because Iran cannot have nuclear weapons. Iran should heed the president’s warning to not retaliate against U.S. forces or U.S. citizens anywhere in the world. Peace through strength remains our goal.”

    Rep. Young Kim: “The military’s targeted actions tonight against Iranian nuclear sites are necessary to deter Tehran’s nuclear ambitions and save lives. I thank our military for their service in this critical operation to restore peace through strength and am glad they are safely on the way home. I look forward to additional briefings from the administration soon.”

    Rep. David Kustoff: “Thank you, @realDonaldTrump, for demonstrating strong leadership on the World stage. Iran should never have a nuclear weapon. This is peace through strength!”

    Rep. Darin LaHood: “@POTUS and the United States have been clear: under no circumstances can Iran be allowed to develop a nuclear weapon. I thank our brave service members, Intelligence Community, and the Administration’s national security team for holding this red line to protect U.S. national security.”

    Rep. Nick LaLota: “Tonight’s American response makes it clear: Iran will be held accountable for its proxies killing Americans and its blatant ambition to bring death to America through nuclear weapons. Tehran must return to the table, abandon its nuclear ambitions, and choose peace. Praying for our brave troops and American citizens in the region.”

    Rep. Doug LaMalfa: “The President’s decision to carry out a targeted strike on Iranian nuclear sites was the right move. It was necessary, and sent a clear message. No other country has the capability to take out this type of threat. I support President Trump’s decision to take action before it was too late. Iran’s leaders chant “Death to America” and “Death to Israel” as official policy and they mean it. They’ve made it clear that if they ever got their hands on a nuclear weapon, they’d use it on America and Israel. We could not leave major Iranian nuclear sites operational and intact.  I hope Iran will take the President’s offer now. They’ve had many chances to give up their weapons ambitions.”

    Rep. Nick Langworthy: “God bless the United States of America and the brave men and women in uniform who sacrifice so much to protect our freedoms and do the extraordinary every day. We pray for their safety, and we pray for wisdom and strength for our Commander in Chief.”

    Rep. Bob Latta: “Iran, the world’s leading state sponsor of terrorism, must never be allowed to obtain a nuclear weapon. The president took decisive action to stop Iran’s nuclear program. Now is the time for peace. God bless and protect our troops.”

    Rep. Mike Lawler: “President Trump made the right decision — and like when President Obama struck Libya, Syria, Pakistan, and Yemen — he did so under the terms of the 2001 and 2002 AUMF. War has not been declared, however, a Nuclear Iran has been prevented. I fully support the President’s decision.”

    Rep. Barry Loudermilk: “Thanks to this bold and decisive action by President Trump, and our amazing military, America and the rest of the world are much safer. Putting America first means prioritizing the safety and security of the United States; and Iran has been a serious threat to the U.S. and our ally, Israel, for decades. President Trump exercised incredible restraint while seeking diplomatic solutions with Iran these past few months; unfortunately, Iran was unwilling to cooperate.”

    Rep. Anna Paulina Luna: “May God protect our brave service members until they return home safely, along with our foreign service officers and the dedicated men and women of the State Department. Pray for our country. We need peace.”

    Rep. Nicole Malliotakis: “There’s no other military in the world that can do what was just done. God bless America and our brave service members.”

    Rep. Tracey Mann: “Audrey and I join the nation in praying for the safety of our troops and civilians in the Middle East. We pray for wisdom for President Trump and his team as they promote American peace through strength. God bless our troops.”

    Rep. Rich McCormick: “President Trump gave Iran every opportunity to give up its nuclear ambitions. They are now very aware that this President will not be dropping pallets of cash to bribe them to stop developing nukes, we will be delivering ordinances that ensures they do.”

    Rep. Addison McDowell: “President Trump protects America and our interests: A nuclear Iran was never an option. God bless America and the brave men and women who serve our nation.”

    Rep. Carol Miller: “Iran was persistent in their refusal to stop enriching uranium. We gave them every opportunity to stop and agree to nuclear disarmament. They refused, so America ended their nuclear weapons program tonight. The Commander in Chief has my full support.”

    Rep. Mary Miller: “A great victory for the United States! President Trump understands that PEACE THROUGH STRENGTH keeps America, and the world, safe and secure.”

    Rep. Max Miller: “As President Trump has stated before, Iran will not have a nuclear weapon. Promises made, promises kept”

    Rep. Mariannette Miller-Meeks: “Under the constitutional authority granted to the president as Commander-in-Chief under Article II, @POTUS took decisive action tonight to keep America, our allies and the world, safe. His bold leadership and commitment to peace through strength delivered results. Our military successfully struck Iran’s nuclear sites, sending a clear message: the world’s top sponsor of terrorism will never obtain a nuclear weapon.  Proud of our warriors and our President.”

    Rep. John Moolenaar: “President Trump has been consistent. A nuclear Iran poses a grave threat to our nation, our military, and our allies. His decision to strike Iran is necessary to keep us and our allies safe, and ensure the largest sponsor of terror in the world does not develop nuclear weapons.”

    Rep. Barry Moore: “I stand with President Trump. God bless him and our brave service members.”

    Rep. Tim Moore: “Iran’s radical regime is a threat to freedom everywhere and has spent decades spreading terror across the globe. President Trump made clear that any attack on Americans or our allies would be met with overwhelming force. May God bless and protect our troops as we confront the evil of Iran and its terrorist proxies.”

    Rep. Nathaniel Moran: “Peace through strength in action. This was a necessary step to protect America and its ally Israel from the clear and present danger presented by Iran and its advanced nuclear program. This is the kind of leadership the moment demands. @POTUS”

    Rep. Troy Nehls: “Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon. I’m glad the mission was successful, and I’m glad we have President Trump in the White House. Peace through strength.”

    Rep. Ralph Norman: “President Trump’s bold leadership didn’t just defend democracy around the world — it helped save it. God bless the USA”

    Rep. Zach Nunn: “As President Trump takes decisive action to eliminate Iran’s nuclear threat, I also remain committed to ensuring our troops—including Iowa’s Guardsmen deploying to the region—are protected and not engaged in a forever war. America remains a strong force for Peace through Strength.”

    Rep. Andy Ogles: “We must end Iran’s nuclear ambitions and protect American lives. Praise God for a successful mission—keep praying for our country.”

    Rep. Burgess Owens: “We have a peace through strength President who doesn’t bluff and knows the world is safer without a nuclear Iran. God bless our U.S. Armed Forces”

    Rep. August Pfluger: “Today, American airmen executed an operation at the direction of President Trump to eliminate Iranian nuclear facilities. I commend President Trump, the national security team, and the men and women who executed these orders on this successful mission. The Iranian regime is the largest sponsor of terrorism and the choice is now theirs… I hope they choose peace and a return to normalized society. But one thing is clear, they will not have a nuclear weapon.”

    Rep. Guy Reschenthaler: “President Trump was right to strike Iran’s nuclear program. A nuclear Iran was a direct threat to our national security and our allies in the region. Iran is responsible for the deaths of hundreds if not thousands of our servicemembers. May God bless our nation and our troops.”

    Rep. John Rose: “Our brave troops executed a well-planned and successful strike in Iran that signals a new chapter in the Middle East, a chapter where there is no misunderstanding about American tolerance of a nuclear-armed Iran. @POTUS is leading with strength, and I fully support this action.”

    Rep. David Rouzer: “I commend President Trump for taking decisive and resolute action to destroy Iran’s nuclear capabilities. Regardless of any Iranian response which may occur, the President and those in our great military responsible for successfully carrying out this difficult mission have provided a meaningful opportunity for lasting peace in the Middle East and safety to the United States and our allies.”

    Rep. Maria Salazar: “Thank you, President Trump, for leading with strength and clarity. Iran must never be allowed to obtain nuclear weapons. May God protect our troops, and may peace prevail through strength.”

    Rep. Austin Scott: “I commend the President for his decisive action to attack Iran’s nuclear program. I also commend the bravery and skill of our warfighters who participated in this important mission. There was no scenario in which Iran could be allowed to continue their nuclear weapons program. The time is now for the Iranian people to rise up against the radical regime.”

    Rep. Keith Self: “This is what leadership from a Commander in Chief looks like.”

    Rep. Adrian Smith: “Through months of talks between negotiators from his administration and Iranian officials, President Trump has shown he is committed to achieving peace for the United States and our allies. Today, he and brave American servicemembers acted decisively when it became clear the Iranian regime, which openly threatened to wield nuclear weapons, was not open to diplomatic engagement. America stands with the friends of freedom, and our forces will defend our people against all threats.”

    Rep. Pete Stauber: “Iran has been wanting to eliminate the United States and Israel for decades. President Trump’s decision to surgically remove this threat was decisive leadership with the power of our extraordinary military force! This is peace through strength.”

    Rep. Greg Steube: “President Trump made every effort to give Iran a peaceful off-ramp to dismantle its nuclear ambitions. The Ayatollah’s refusal to negotiate in good faith confirms what we’ve long known: Iran cannot be trusted with nuclear weapons. I’m deeply grateful to our brave men and women in uniform for executing their mission with courage and precision. And I thank President Trump for his decisive leadership during this critical moment.”

    Rep. Dale Strong: “A nuclear-armed Iran is a threat to the entire world. They had ample time to come to the table and make a deal, but forced President Trump to take action to ensure the safety of our country and our allies.”

    Rep. Marlin Stutzman: “Peace through strength means you have to be willing to prove your strength when adversaries will not accept the peaceful option. I support President Trump’s decision and am thankful the strikes were successful. God Bless America!”

    Rep. Claudia Tenney: “President Trump has shown unwavering resolve in defending the U.S. & the free world. We are grateful for the bravery of our servicemembers who carried out these successful airstrikes & for President Trump’s leadership as our Commander in Chief!  God Bless America”

    Rep. William Timmons: “President Trump took decisive action against Iran’s nuclear threat. This sends a clear message: the U.S. will defend our interests and our allies. Grateful our Airmen carried out the mission safely — their courage keeps us safe. FLY FIGHT WIN”

    Rep. Derrick Van Orden: “Peace Through Strength. The terrorist regime in Iran’s time in the sun is over.”

    Rep. Tim Walberg: “Tonight, President @realDonaldTrump displayed decisive action to eliminate the nuclear program of the world’s largest state sponsor of terrorism. President Trump pursued and exhausted diplomatic options, and to protect the security of our nation, this moment called for strong leadership. God bless America and God bless our troops.”

    Rep. Ann Wagner: “Iran was given every chance to get rid of its nuclear program, but instead of choosing peace the Ayatollah embraced violence and chaos. President Trump was absolutely right to send our bombers in and strike the Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan nuclear facilities, and this decision will save American lives and protect our national security. He and I are in full agreement that we must achieve peace through strength, and today’s decisive strikes are a testament to that shared commitment. Iran cannot and will not have nuclear weapons and today is a direct result of the Ayatollah’s reckless choices…”

    Rep. Randy Weber: “Iran should NEVER have their hands on a nuclear weapon. President Trump ensured that won’t happen. Congratulations on a successful mission.”

    Rep. Roger Williams: “We must always stand with Israel.  Iran should never have a nuclear weapon and I’m thankful that under @realDonaldTrump, our country is stronger than ever.  God bless our military.  We pray for their safety and for peace.”

    Rep. Joe Wilson: “President Trump has been consistent in his willingness to engage in negotiations. Enemies of America insult this effort instead pursuing apocalyptic delusions. Ultimately, Peace is achieved through deterrence and Strength. Assad was warned in 2017. The Iranian regime was warned. War criminal Putin has been warned. President Trump will not hesitate to act when tested.”

    Rep. Rob Wittman: “The President was right – Iran refused to commit to nuclear disarmament. This was the right decision. America must secure peace through strength. God bless our servicemen and women in uniform – I am praying for their safe return.”

    Rep. Steve Womack: “I support the President’s decisive action to thwart Iran from completing a nuclear weapon. Our Israeli allies were instrumental in setting the conditions for these strikes, and President Trump’s decision ultimately makes America and our allies safer. I thank God for the bravery and safety of our servicemembers who made this mission a success.”

    Rep. Rudy Yakym: “Thank you to our brave warfighters for defending the greatest nation on earth. God bless our troops and the United States of America!”

    Rep. Ryan Zinke: “We gave Iran a chance, they didn’t take it. The President has been crystal clear: Iran must not have nuclear weapons. If they don’t give up their nuclear program, this will continue to escalate. They will lose their Army, Navy, what’s left of their Air Force AND they will lose their refineries. This is a fight they will not win. I pray for the freedom loving Iranian people who have lived under extremism for too long.”

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Australia: $13-million investment reopens Boodjamulla National Park (Aboriginal Land)

    Source: Tasmania Police

    Issued: 20 Jun 2025

    One of Queensland’s most popular outback national parks will reopen on 4 July 2025, in a major boost for the local tourism industry.

    Boodjamulla National Park (Aboriginal Land) was closed following the impacts of an unprecedented flood event in March 2023.

    The Boodjamulla Cooperative Management Council (CMC), comprising the Department of the Environment, Tourism, Science and Innovation (DETSI) and the Waanyi Native Title Aboriginal Corporation, has been working hard to re-open the national park.

    Principal Ranger Marnie Augusteyn said the Queensland Government had invested almost $13 million to reopen the national park, and the tourism industry is thrilled.

    “The funding includes an investment of $6.7 million for repairs and the construction of new visitor infrastructure within the Lawn Hill Gorge section,” Ms Augusteyn said.

    “We’re also investing $6.1 million for reconstruction work on water treatment, sewage management, power supply and flood resilience work into our ranger residences.”

    Michael Miller CEO Waanyi Native Title Aboriginal Corporation said he was on Country recently to inspect the progress.

    “To assist with the staged reopening, Waanyi Elder Everyl Johnny will be based at Boodjamulla gorge to personally welcome visitors on behalf of all Waanyi people to the national park,” Mr Miller said.

    “She will provide inductions to visitors, giving insight into Waanyi culture and the impacts of the flooding.

    “On behalf of the Waanyi Native Title Aboriginal Corporation, we welcome visitors back to the national park.

    “This is our backyard, and please treat it with the same respect that you would your own backyard.

    “Please pay attention to restricted access areas for your own safety and pay respect to our culture.”

    CEO Tourism Tropical North Queensland Mark Olsen said the Lawn Hill Gorge section of Boodjamulla National Park is an iconic location.

    “Reopening Boodjamulla National Park for winter will provide a much needed boost to the northwest and the communities along the Savannah Way that have faced difficult times over past three years,” Mr Olsen said.

    “Our great thanks and appreciation to the Waanyi Native Title Corporation, the DETSI team and the QPWS team onsite that have made this possible, it is a huge boost for the region.”

    In June 2023, the national park was returned to the Waanyi People. Now dedicated as Boodjamulla National Park (Aboriginal Land), it is the first of its tenure class in Queensland.

    For more information on available tourism activities, visit Lawn Hill Gorge, Boodjamulla (Lawn Hill) National Park or Boodjamulla Cooperative Management Council.

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Press release – Clean Industrial Deal must marry industrial competitiveness with climate action

    Source: European Parliament

    The Industrial Decarbonisation Bank and action plan for affordable energy are crucial for the competitiveness and resilience of European industry, MEPs say.

    The resolution, adopted on Thursday 19 June in response to the European Commission’s Clean Industrial Deal plan, stresses the need to combine climate action with industrial competitiveness.

    It underscores the importance of the newly established Industrial Decarbonisation Bank, which MEPs consider vital for scaling up investment in clean technologies. Investment should be based on carbon impact, scalability, and security of supply, they say.

    Parliament welcomes lead markets for European-made clean, circular and low-carbon products, and stresses the need to stimulate demand through public and private procurement.

    MEPs also advocate for the protection of the EU market from unfair competition and the dumping of industrial overcapacity from third countries. They underline the importance of an effective carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM) in the context of phasing out free allowances under the emissions trading system (ETS).

    Faster permitting procedures

    The resolution addresses the importance of regulatory simplification and the need to streamline permitting procedures to support the transition and innovation efforts of small businesses. MEPs want to simplify funding applications, reduce reporting obligations, and fast-track small projects.

    They also want to build the business case for permanent carbon removals in upcoming legislative reviews, as carbon management, including capture, storage, transport, and utilisation, may be necessary for hard-to-abate sectors, they say.

    Affordable energy action plan

    MEPs support the action plan for affordable energy and demand measures to boost cross-border energy infrastructure and complete the energy union. The current fragmentation of regulatory oversight and investment planning across Member States is hampering integration and electrification, they say. MEPs also call on Member States, transmission system operators and the Commission to do more to promote cross-border electricity trading.

    Quote

    “European industry is facing enormous challenges, while a strong industrial base is essential for our competitiveness and strategic autonomy. The Clean Industrial Deal offers a strategy for a competitive and decarbonised European industry. At the same time, it seeks to protect our autonomy and secure jobs. This Deal is an important first step, but time is running out. We urge the Commission to act without delay and raise its level of ambition. When it comes to industrial policy, European cooperation is more crucial than ever” said lead MEP Tom Berendsen (EPP, Netherlands).

    The resolution was adopted with 381 votes to 173, with 13 abstentions.

    Background: Clean Industrial Deal

    Presented by the European Commission in February, the Clean Industrial Deal aims to support the competitiveness and resilience of European industry. It focuses mainly on two sectors: energy-intensive industries and clean technology, and aims to lower energy costs via an action plan on affordable energy. The Clean Industrial Deal also seeks to boost demand for clean products, further finance the clean transition and improve circularity, access to critical raw materials and the establishment of sectoral skills for strategic industries.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI: $500 Loan for Bad Credit with No Credit Check Instant Approval – Just Launched by Radcred

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Glendale, California, June 19, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Radcred announced the launch of a new online platform designed to help Americans manage unexpected financial challenges by offering access to $500 loan options, even for those with poor credit. The service connects applicants to a network of vetted direct lenders, aiming to provide clear terms, data security, and fast application decisions.

    The platform enables borrowers to complete secure online applications and receive same-day responses. With competitive rates and straightforward repayment plans, the initiative offers an alternative to traditional short-term lending practices.

    Americans Turn to Radcred Amid Rising Need for $500 Emergency Loans

    In today’s uncertain economy, more Americans are seeking fast, reliable solutions for small financial emergencies. Radcred has become a go-to loan platform because it simplifies access to $500 payday loans, $500 loan no credit check direct lender options, and urgent loans for bad credit. With its network of no credit check loans direct lenders, Radcred helps borrowers secure loans for bad credit with instant approval when they need it most.

    • Rising Cost of Living: Everyday expenses, from medical bills to car repairs, are pushing many to seek small-dollar loans. Radcred meets this demand with affordable options.
    • Access for Low-Credit Borrowers: Unlike banks, Radcred’s network welcomes borrowers with bad credit or no credit history at all.
    • Fast Processing: Radcred specializes in same-day approvals, enabling borrowers to cover emergencies promptly.
    • Transparent Fee Structure: Borrowers see rates and fees upfront, ensuring no surprises later.

    UNDERSTAND REPAYMENT PLANS THAT FIT BUDGETS

    Who Can Qualify for Radcred’s $500 Loan with Bad Credit?

    Radcred has streamlined its qualification requirements, allowing many to apply with confidence for a $500 loan no credit check or bad credit loans. Even those with low or no credit history are encouraged to explore this option. By working with a no credit check loans guaranteed approval direct lender network, Radcred makes it easier for borrowers to access urgent loans for bad credit and loans for bad credit instant approval nationwide. Let’s have a look at who qualifies for a $500 loan with bad credit.

    • U.S. Residents Age 18+: Applicants must be legal U.S. residents, at least 18 years of age.
    • Proof of Income: Borrowers must demonstrate a steady income source through employment, benefits, or self-employment.
    • Active Checking Account: An operational bank account is required to receive electronic funds.
    • Valid Contact Information: Email and phone details are required to ensure smooth communication throughout the loan process.
    • Minimal Debt-to-Income Ratio: While flexible, lenders may review your existing obligations to confirm loan affordability.

    COMPARE LENDERS TO MAKE INFORMED CHOICES

    How Radcred’s $500 Loan No Credit Check Process Works?

    Radcred has made it simple to apply for a $500 loan with no credit check from a direct lender. Every step is designed for ease, speed, and security. The platform connects borrowers with a network of no credit check loans guaranteed approval direct lenders, helping those in need of urgent loans for bad credit or loans for bad credit with instant approval. Applicants can complete the process online, with no paperwork or in-person visits required.

    • Step 1: Submit the Online Form: The process begins with a secure, easy-to-complete form that requests basic financial details.
    • Step 2: Instant Lender Matching: Radcred connects you with direct lenders most likely to approve your application.
    • Step 3: Review Offers: Borrowers can compare loan terms side by side, including APR, fees, and repayment timelines.
    • Step 4: Sign the Agreement: Once you are satisfied, you will electronically sign your agreement, locking in your loan terms.
    • Step 5: Same-Day Deposit: Funds are typically deposited the same business day, helping you address urgent needs fast.

    How Radcred Differs from Payday Lenders in Bad Credit Loans?

    While payday lenders often focus on short-term, high-cost loans that can lead to debt cycles, Radcred provides more sustainable alternatives designed to help borrowers avoid long-term debt traps. Radcred connects applicants to no credit check loans guaranteed approval, and direct lenders offering transparent terms for bad credit loans with no credit check.

    • Competitive APRs: Radcred’s lenders offer lower, more competitive rates than typical payday shops.
    • Transparent Terms: You’ll see all costs upfront with no hidden rollover fees that payday loans often include.
    • Flexible Repayment Plans: Borrowers can often choose installment-based repayments instead of a single lump-sum payment.
    • No Store Visits Required: Radcred’s platform is 100% online with no waiting in line or paperwork.
    • Vetted Lender Network: Each partner is reviewed for fair practices, so you avoid predatory terms.

    Benefits of Choosing Radcred for Your $500 Personal Loan

    Radcred connects borrowers to direct lenders offering $500 loan options for bad credit with clear terms and no hidden fees. Applicants provide basic financial and contact details through a secure form. The platform matches them with lenders, allowing review of rates and terms before accepting an offer. Funds are typically deposited within one business day.

    • Quick Online Application: Complete the form in minutes, from anywhere, at any time.
    • No Credit Check Loans Guaranteed Approval Direct Lender: Bad credit? No worries. Radcred’s partners consider more than just scores.
    • Multiple Offers: Borrowers can select from several loan options, finding the one that fits their budget.
    • Safe and Secure Platform: Radcred uses encryption technology to protect personal and financial data.
    • No Hidden Fees: What you see is what you pay with no surprise charges.

    Common Uses for Emergency Loans

    Radcred loans are designed for life’s urgent moments, offering quick, no credit check funding to help borrowers handle unexpected expenses with ease, reliability, and less stress.

    • Emergency expenses: Radcred offers fast loans for car repairs, medical bills, or urgent household needs.
    • Medical emergencies: Borrowers can cover unexpected bills or co-pays without delay.
    • Car repairs: Quick funding helps users get back on the road fast.
    • Utility bills: Prevent disconnections with fast loan approval.
    • Groceries and essentials: Bridge short-term cash gaps to cover daily needs.
    • Childcare costs: Handle last-minute daycare or school-related expenses stress-free.

    CHECK ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS BEFORE APPLYING ONLINE

    Technology Used by Radcred For Urgent Loans for Bad Credit

    Radcred integrates modern financial technology and security protocols to support borrowers with bad credit seeking loan options.

    • Advanced Fintech: The platform leverages technology designed to enhance processing speed, security, and ease of use.
    • Real-Time Matching: An automated system helps match applicants with direct lenders based on provided income, banking details, and loan request information.
    • Efficient Decisions: The process is designed to reduce manual review time, allowing applicants to receive lender matches and decisions promptly.
    • Data Security: Radcred uses 256-bit SSL encryption to protect personal and financial data, supporting privacy and secure transactions.
    • Mobile Compatibility: The platform can be accessed securely from smartphones, tablets, or desktops for added convenience.

    Radcred’s system reflects a focus on security, efficiency, and accessibility for individuals exploring loan solutions through its network of direct lenders.

    Final Thoughts: Radcred Delivers Essential Relief for Low Credit Consumers

    Radcred’s $500 loan for bad credit with no credit check provides a reliable solution for urgent expenses. Partnering with vetted subprime lenders, it offers competitive APRs, transparent fees, and side-by-side comparisons of rates, fees, and terms. With its focus on safety, speed, and borrower-friendly policies, Radcred delivers quick, trustworthy financial support.

    About Radcred

    Radcred is an online platform that links borrowers with third-party lenders offering personal and emergency loan options. It does not provide loans itself but enables secure online applications. The platform prioritizes data protection, regulatory compliance, and connecting users to short-term loan solutions through its trusted network.

    Disclaimer

    This press release is for informational purposes only and not financial advice. Loan terms, rates, and approvals vary by lender and applicant profile. Radcred is not a lender and does not make credit decisions. Review all terms carefully and consider consulting a financial professional before applying.

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – EU ETS for maritime transport – P-001895/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    All sectors, including maritime transport, must contribute to the EU climate neutrality goal by 2050 and the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) is key to achieve this objective.

    For reasons of administrative practicability, ships below 5 000 gross tonnage (GT) were not included within the scope of the ETS Directive[1] from the start of its extension to maritime transport, but their inclusion in the future could improve the effectiveness of the EU ETS and potentially reduce evasive behaviour with the use of ships below the size threshold[2].

    Therefore, the ETS Directive requires the Commission to examine, no later than end of 2026, the feasibility and economic, environmental and social impacts of such a possible inclusion. Other, national measures could be taken, such as opt-ins within the ETS2 for buildings, road transport and additional sectors.

    The Commission recently adopted a report[3] assessing the potential inclusion of smaller ships under the scope of the EU Regulation for the monitoring, reporting and verification of maritime greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.

    It notes that such an extension could have a positive impact on the level playing field since vessels just above or below the size threshold might be competing for similar market segments.

    In addition, it shows that it could help unlock the implementation of energy efficiency and low carbon solutions. However, the analysis also finds that the balance between administrative costs and additional monitored GHG emissions is less favourable for smaller ships.

    The Commission has committed to use 20 million EU allowances[4] until 2030 to support the decarbonisation of the maritime sector via the Innovation Fund, which can, as well as other instruments[5], support retrofitting of ships.

    • [1] Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC (OJ L 275, 25.10.2003, p. 32).
    • [2] The report from the Commission on the m onitoring of the implementation of the ETS Directive in relation to maritime transport from 18 March 2025 shows that there is no evidence of an increased use of vessels between 4 000 GT and 5 000 GT in 2024 compared to the previous year- COM(2025) 110 final — https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:52025DC0110 .
    • [3]  COM(2025) 109 final — https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:52025DC0109.
    • [4] Worth about EUR 1.5 billion with a price of EUR 75 per EU allowance.
    • [5] An inventory of financing products supporting investments in the shipping sector is available in the Ship Financing Portal — https://transport.ec.europa.eu/transport-modes/maritime/ship-financing-portal_en.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Exclusion of the ceramics sector from cost offsets under the Emissions Trading System (ETS) and the single market distortions caused by the allocation of free allowances – E-001557/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    1. Installations producing ceramic tiles are covered by the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS). They receive free allocation on the basis of the spray-dried powder benchmark and of fall-back benchmarks for the processes not covered by the spray-dried powder benchmark. In this context, heat generated by means of combined heat and power (CHP) systems is rewarded by free allocation. In addition, operators of CHPs benefit from the ETS carbon price included in the electricity price, in particular as additional revenue for the electricity sold on the market. Therefore, the Commission does not see a need to change the current rules providing both, carbon leakage protection and incentives to invest into innovative low-carbon technologies including CHPs.

    2. The ceramics sector is energy-intensive for the production processes as well as trade-intensive. Therefore, it is considered at risk of carbon leakage and therefore eligible to receive free allowances at 100% of benchmark level in line with Commission Delegated Decision (EU) 2019/708[1] for the period 2021-2030. Member States may award state aid to electro-intensive industries to compensate for the cost of carbon emissions passed on through electricity bills (indirect cost compensation). However, the eligibility threshold set for this aid is an indirect emission intensity of at least 1 kg CO2/EUR, which was not reached for sector 23.31 (Manufacture of ceramic tiles and flags) when the eligibility was assessed as part of the 2020 adoption of the relevant Commission guidelines[2]. The sector is therefore not currently eligible for this aid.

    • [1] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dec_del/2019/708/oj: OJ C 317, 25.9.2020, p. 5-19.
    • [2] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=oj:JOC_2020_317_R_0004.
    Last updated: 18 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Minutes – Wednesday, 18 June 2025 – Strasbourg – Final edition

    Source: European Parliament

    PV-10-2025-06-18

    EN

    EN

    iPlPv_Sit

    Minutes
    Wednesday, 18 June 2025 – Strasbourg

     Abbreviations and symbols

    + adopted
    rejected
    lapsed
    W withdrawn
    RCV roll-call votes
    EV electronic vote
    SEC secret ballot
    split split vote
    sep separate vote
    am amendment
    CA compromise amendment
    CP corresponding part
    D deleting amendment
    = identical amendments
    § paragraph

    EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

    2025 – 2026 SESSION

    Sittings of 16 to 19 June 2025

    STRASBOURG

    MINUTES

    WEDNESDAY 18 JUNE 2025

    IN THE CHAIR: Roberta METSOLA
    President

    1. Opening of the sitting

    The sitting opened at 09:02.



    2. Negotiations ahead of Parliament’s first reading (Rule 72) (action taken)

    The decision of the LIBE Committee to enter into interinstitutional negotiations had been announced on 16 June 2025 (minutes of 16.6.2025, item 12).

    As no request for a vote pursuant to Rule 72(2) had been made, the committee responsible had been able to enter into negotiations upon expiry of the deadline.



    3. Upcoming NATO summit on 24-26 June 2025 (debate)

    Commission statement: Upcoming NATO summit on 24-26 June 2025 (2025/2748(RSP))

    The President provided some clarifications on the arrangements for the conduct of the debate, for which a test format was to be used.

    Kaja Kallas (Vice President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy) made the statement.

    The following spoke: Nicolás Pascual de la Parte, on behalf of the PPE Group, Yannis Maniatis, on behalf of the S&D Group, Harald Vilimsky, on behalf of the PfE Group, Alexandr Vondra, on behalf of the ECR Group, Valérie Hayer, on behalf of the Renew Group, Bas Eickhout, on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group, Marc Botenga, on behalf of The Left Group, René Aust, on behalf of the ESN Group, Michael Gahler, Sven Mikser, Jean-Paul Garraud, Adam Bielan, Dan Barna, Mārtiņš Staķis, Özlem Demirel, Milan Uhrík, Ruth Firmenich, Ingeborg Ter Laak and Eero Heinäluoma.

    IN THE CHAIR: Sabine VERHEYEN
    Vice-President

    The following spoke: Anna Bryłka, Rasa Juknevičienė, Bert-Jan Ruissen, Petras Auštrevičius, Sebastião Bugalho, Hannah Neumann, Merja Kyllönen, Pekka Toveri, Elio Di Rupo, Roberto Vannacci, Sebastian Tynkkynen, Wouter Beke, Dan Nica, Hans Neuhoff, Ioan-Rareş Bogdan, Branislav Ondruš, who also answered a blue-card question from Maria Grapini, Riho Terras, Tobias Cremer, Jaak Madison, Markéta Gregorová, Michał Szczerba, Marina Mesure, Sarah Knafo, Ondřej Dostál, Angelika Niebler, who also declined to take a blue-card question from Özlem Demirel, Tonino Picula, Pierre-Romain Thionnet, Stephen Nikola Bartulica, Massimiliano Salini, Evin Incir, Lucia Yar, Mika Aaltola, Giorgos Georgiou, Davor Ivo Stier, Vilija Blinkevičiūtė, Georgiana Teodorescu, Reinier Van Lanschot, Željana Zovko, Rihards Kols, Irene Montero, Eszter Lakos, Petar Volgin and Juan Ignacio Zoido Álvarez.

    IN THE CHAIR: Javi LÓPEZ
    Vice-President

    The following spoke: José Cepeda, Petra Steger, who also declined to take a blue-card question from Marta Wcisło, Jüri Ratas, Loucas Fourlas, Niels Fuglsang, Engin Eroglu, Miriam Lexmann, Kathleen Funchion, Ana Miguel Pedro, who also answered a blue-card question from João Oliveira, Francisco Assis, Matej Tonin, Johan Van Overtveldt, Anders Vistisen, Marta Wcisło, Ville Niinistö, Sandra Kalniete and Danilo Della Valle.

    The following spoke under the catch-the-eye procedure: Hélder Sousa Silva, Maria Grapini, João Oliveira, Petras Gražulis, Lukas Sieper, Vytenis Povilas Andriukaitis, Lefteris Nikolaou-Alavanos and Juan Fernando López Aguilar.

    The following spoke: Kaja Kallas.

    The debate closed.

    (The sitting was suspended at 11:43.)



    IN THE CHAIR: Roberta METSOLA
    President

    4. Resumption of the sitting

    The sitting resumed at 12:00.



    5. Voting time

    For detailed results of the votes, see also ‘Results of votes’ and ‘Results of roll-call votes’.



    5.1. Macro-financial assistance to Egypt ***I (vote)

    Report on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on providing macro-financial assistance to the Arab Republic of Egypt [COM(2024)0461 – C10-0009/2024 – 2024/0071(COD)] – Committee on International Trade. Rapporteur: Céline Imart (A10-0037/2025)

    An initial vote had been held on 1 April 2025 and the matter had been referred back to the committee responsible for interinstitutional negotiations under Rule 60(4) (minutes of 1.4.2025, item 6.11).

    (Majority of the votes cast)

    REQUEST FROM THE LEFT GROUP TO PROCEED WITH A VOTE ON THE AMENDMENTS (Rule 60(3))

    Rejected

    PROVISIONAL AGREEMENT

    Adopted (P10_TA(2025)125)

    Parliament’s first reading thus closed.

    Detailed voting results



    5.2. Adoption by the Union of the Agreement on the interpretation and application of the Energy Charter Treaty ***I (vote)

    Report on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on the adoption by the Union of the Agreement on the interpretation and application of the Energy Charter Treaty between the European Union, the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States [COM(2024)0257 – C10-0058/2024 – 2024/0148(COD)] – Committee on International Trade – Committee on Industry, Research and Energy. Rapporteurs: Anna Cavazzini and Borys Budka (A10-0009/2025)

    (Majority of the votes cast)

    COMMISSION PROPOSAL and AMENDMENTS

    Approved (P10_TA(2025)126)

    Parliament’s first reading thus closed.

    Detailed voting results

    2

    The following had spoken:

    Anna Cavazzini (rapporteur), before the vote, to make a statement on the basis of Rule 165(4).



    5.3. EU/Euratom Agreement on the interpretation and application of the Energy Charter Treaty: adoption by Euratom * (vote)

    Report on the Proposal for a Council decision on the adoption by the European Atomic Energy Community of the Agreement on the interpretation and application of the Energy Charter Treaty between the European Union, the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States [COM(2024)0256 – C10-0092/2024 – 2024/0146(NLE)] – Committee on Industry, Research and Energy. Rapporteur: Borys Budka (A10-0008/2025)

    (Majority of the votes cast)

    COMMISSION PROPOSAL TO THE COUNCIL

    Approved by single vote (P10_TA(2025)127)

    Detailed voting results



    5.4. Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility (vote)

    Report on the implementation of the Recovery and Resilience Facility [2024/2085(INI)] – Committee on Budgets – Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs. Rapporteurs: Victor Negrescu and Siegfried Mureşan (A10-0098/2025)

    The debate had taken place on 17 June 2025 (minutes of 17.6.2025, item 10).

    (Majority of the votes cast)

    MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION

    Adopted (P10_TA(2025)128)

    Detailed voting results



    5.5. The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law report (vote)

    Report on The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law report [2024/2078(INI)] – Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs. Rapporteur: Ana Catarina Mendes (A10-0100/2025)

    The debate had taken place on 17 June 2025 (minutes of 17.6.2025, item 11).

    (Majority of the votes cast)

    MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION

    Adopted (P10_TA(2025)129)

    Detailed voting results



    5.6. 2023 and 2024 reports on Montenegro (vote)

    Report on the 2023 and 2024 Commission reports on Montenegro [2025/2020(INI)] – Committee on Foreign Affairs. Rapporteur: Marjan Šarec (A10-0093/2025)

    The debate had taken place on 17 June 2025 (minutes of 17.6.2025, item 12).

    (Majority of the votes cast)

    MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION

    Adopted (P10_TA(2025)130)

    Detailed voting results



    5.7. 2023 and 2024 reports on Moldova (vote)

    Report on 2023 and 2024 Commission reports on Moldova [2025/2025(INI)] – Committee on Foreign Affairs. Rapporteur: Sven Mikser (A10-0096/2025)

    The debate had taken place on 17 June 2025 (minutes of 17.6.2025, item 13).

    (Majority of the votes cast)

    MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION

    Adopted (P10_TA(2025)131)

    Detailed voting results

    7

    (The sitting was suspended for a few moments.)



    IN THE CHAIR: Christel SCHALDEMOSE
    Vice-President

    6. Resumption of the sitting

    The sitting resumed at 12:35.



    7. Approval of the minutes of the previous sitting

    The minutes of the previous sitting were approved.



    8. Stopping the genocide in Gaza: time for EU sanctions (topical debate)

    The following spoke: Manon Aubry to open the debate proposed by the The Left Group.

    The following spoke: Kaja Kallas (Vice President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy).

    The following spoke: Hildegard Bentele, on behalf of the PPE Group, Nacho Sánchez Amor, on behalf of the S&D Group, Juan Carlos Girauta Vidal, on behalf of the PfE Group (the President noted that some comments needed to be checked), Sebastian Tynkkynen, on behalf of the ECR Group, Hilde Vautmans, on behalf of the Renew Group, Tineke Strik, on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group, Hanna Gedin, on behalf of The Left Group, Marc Jongen, on behalf of the ESN Group, Seán Kelly, Evin Incir, Beatrice Timgren, Barry Andrews, Jaume Asens Llodrà, Nikos Pappas, Kateřina Konečná, Matjaž Nemec, Christophe Bay, Kristoffer Storm, Ilhan Kyuchyuk, Ana Miranda Paz, Isabel Serra Sánchez, Ruth Firmenich, Francisco Assis, Abir Al-Sahlani, Ignazio Roberto Marino, Per Clausen, Cecilia Strada, Irena Joveva, Ville Niinistö, Özlem Demirel, Alex Agius Saliba, Lucia Yar, Giorgos Georgiou, Elio Di Rupo, Billy Kelleher, Estrella Galán, Ciaran Mullooly, Mimmo Lucano, Pernando Barrena Arza and Jussi Saramo (once the checks had been carried out, the President provided some clarifications).

    The following spoke: Kaja Kallas.

    The debate closed.



    9. Freedom of assembly in Hungary and the need for the Commission to act (debate)

    Commission statement: Freedom of assembly in Hungary and the need for the Commission to act (2025/2758(RSP))

    Michael McGrath (Member of the Commission) made the statement.

    The following spoke: Tomas Tobé, on behalf of the PPE Group, Iratxe García Pérez, on behalf of the S&D Group, Kinga Gál, on behalf of the PfE Group, Paolo Inselvini, on behalf of the ECR Group, Fabienne Keller, on behalf of the Renew Group, Terry Reintke, on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group, Konstantinos Arvanitis, on behalf of The Left Group, Zsuzsanna Borvendég, on behalf of the ESN Group, Michał Wawrykiewicz, Klára Dobrev, Harald Vilimsky, who also declined to take a blue-card question from Nicolae Ştefănuță, Nicolas Bay, who also answered a blue-card question from Mélissa Camara, Dainius Žalimas, who also answered a blue-card question from Lukas Sieper, Tineke Strik, Ilaria Salis, who also declined to take a blue-card question, Christine Anderson, who also declined to take a blue-card question, Judita Laššáková, Maria Walsh, Ana Catarina Mendes and Hermann Tertsch.

    IN THE CHAIR: Martin HOJSÍK
    Vice-President

    The following spoke: Arkadiusz Mularczyk, who also answered a blue-card question from Lukas Sieper, Moritz Körner, Mélissa Camara, who also answered a blue-card question from Jacek Ozdoba, Carolina Morace, Milan Mazurek, Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă, Arba Kokalari, Marc Angel, Paolo Borchia, Jacek Ozdoba, Raquel García Hermida-Van Der Walle, Daniel Freund (the President reminded him of the rules on conduct), Li Andersson, Tomasz Froelich, Lukas Sieper, Mirosława Nykiel, Alessandro Zan, Jorge Buxadé Villalba, Tobiasz Bocheński, who also answered a blue-card question from Raquel García Hermida-Van Der Walle, Kim Van Sparrentak, Lena Düpont, Krzysztof Śmiszek, András László, who also answered a blue-card question from Michał Wawrykiewicz, Rasmus Nordqvist, who also answered a blue-card question from Tomasz Froelich, Evin Incir, Juan Fernando López Aguilar and Chloé Ridel.

    The following spoke under the catch-the-eye procedure: Sebastian Tynkkynen and Alexander Jungbluth.

    The following spoke: Michael McGrath.

    The debate closed.



    10. Safeguarding the rule of law in Spain, ensuring an independent and autonomous prosecutor’s office to fight crime and corruption (debate)

    Commission statement: Safeguarding the rule of law in Spain, ensuring an independent and autonomous prosecutor’s office to fight crime and corruption (2025/2759(RSP))

    Michael McGrath (Member of the Commission) made the statement.

    The following spoke: Tomas Tobé, on behalf of the PPE Group, Javier Moreno Sánchez, on behalf of the S&D Group, Jorge Buxadé Villalba, on behalf of the PfE Group, Diego Solier, on behalf of the ECR Group, Oihane Agirregoitia Martínez, on behalf of the Renew Group, Diana Riba i Giner, on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group, Isabel Serra Sánchez, on behalf of The Left Group, Dolors Montserrat, Evelyn Regner, who also declined to take a blue-card question from Enikő Győri, Hermann Tertsch, Nora Junco García, João Cotrim De Figueiredo, Jaume Asens Llodrà, Lena Düpont, Francisco Assis, Petra Steger, Siegfried Mureşan, who also answered a blue-card question from Maria Grapini, and Sandro Ruotolo.

    IN THE CHAIR: Younous OMARJEE
    Vice-President

    The following spoke: Enikő Győri, who also answered a blue-card question from Gabriella Gerzsenyi, Michał Wawrykiewicz, who also answered a blue-card question from Nicolás González Casares, Evin Incir, who also declined to take a blue-card question from François-Xavier Bellamy, Csaba Dömötör, Sebastião Bugalho, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, who also declined to take a blue-card question from François-Xavier Bellamy, Fabrice Leggeri, François-Xavier Bellamy to raise a point of order (the President cut off the speaker as his remarks did not constitute a point of order), Juan Ignacio Zoido Álvarez, Juan Carlos Girauta Vidal, who also accepted a blue-card question from François-Xavier Bellamy (the President cut him off and made some clarifications on the blue-card procedure), David Casa, Ana Miguel Pedro, Dirk Gotink, Andrey Kovatchev and Javier Zarzalejos.

    The following spoke under the catch-the-eye procedure: José Cepeda, András László, Sebastian Tynkkynen and Lukas Sieper.

    The following spoke: Michael McGrath.

    The debate closed.



    11. Clean Industrial Deal (debate)

    Question for oral answer O-000020/2025 by Tom Berendsen, on behalf of the ITRE Committee to the Commission: Clean Industrial Deal (B10-0006/2025) (2025/2656(RSP))

    Tom Berendsen moved the question.

    Stéphane Séjourné (Executive Vice-President of the Commission) answered the question.

    The following spoke: Angelika Winzig, on behalf of the PPE Group, Nicolás González Casares, on behalf of the S&D Group, Paolo Borchia, on behalf of the PfE Group, Daniel Obajtek, on behalf of the ECR Group, Christophe Grudler, on behalf of the Renew Group, Sara Matthieu, on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group, Per Clausen, on behalf of The Left Group, and Anja Arndt, on behalf of the ESN Group.

    The following spoke: Stéphane Séjourné.

    Motions for resolutions tabled under Rule 142(5) to wind up the debate: minutes of 19.6.2025, item I.

    The debate closed.

    Vote: 19 June 2025.



    12. Electricity grids: the backbone of the EU energy system (debate)

    Report on electricity grids: the backbone of the EU energy system [2025/2006(INI)] – Committee on Industry, Research and Energy. Rapporteur: Anna Stürgkh (A10-0091/2025)

    Anna Stürgkh introduced the report.

    The following spoke: Ekaterina Zaharieva (Member of the Commission).

    The following spoke: Seán Kelly, on behalf of the PPE Group, Bruno Tobback, on behalf of the S&D Group, András Gyürk, on behalf of the PfE Group, Ondřej Krutílek, on behalf of the ECR Group, Christophe Grudler, on behalf of the Renew Group, Kira Marie Peter-Hansen, on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group, Dario Tamburrano, on behalf of The Left Group, Sarah Knafo, on behalf of the ESN Group, Angelika Winzig, Mohammed Chahim, Aleksandar Nikolic, Diego Solier, João Cotrim De Figueiredo, Jutta Paulus, Markus Buchheit, who also answered a blue-card question from Jutta Paulus, Fernand Kartheiser, Paulo Cunha, Tsvetelina Penkova, Isabella Tovaglieri, who also declined to take a blue-card question from Dario Nardella, Mariateresa Vivaldini, Barry Andrews, Benedetta Scuderi, Marcin Sypniewski, who also answered a blue-card question from Stine Bosse, Fidias Panayiotou, Mirosława Nykiel, Yannis Maniatis and Julie Rechagneux.

    IN THE CHAIR: Antonella SBERNA
    Vice-President

    The following spoke: Ivars Ijabs, Michael Bloss, Andrea Wechsler, Dario Nardella, Mireia Borrás Pabón, Marion Maréchal, Bart Groothuis, Virgil-Daniel Popescu, Jens Geier, Nikola Bartůšek, Beatrice Timgren, Wouter Beke, Nicolás González Casares, who also answered blue-card questions from João Oliveira and Mireia Borrás Pabón, Gilles Pennelle, Hildegard Bentele, who also answered a blue-card question from Lukas Sieper, Sofie Eriksson, Niels Flemming Hansen, Jüri Ratas, Michał Szczerba, Dimitris Tsiodras, Krzysztof Hetman, Andreas Schwab, Regina Doherty and Tomislav Sokol.

    The following spoke under the catch-the-eye procedure: Vytenis Povilas Andriukaitis, Sebastian Tynkkynen, Billy Kelleher, João Oliveira, Maria Zacharia and Lukas Sieper.

    The following spoke: Ekaterina Zaharieva and Anna Stürgkh.

    The debate closed.

    Vote: 19 June 2025.



    13. Composition of committees and delegations

    The ECR Group had notified the President of the following decision changing the composition of the committees and delegations:

    – ITRE Committee: Anna Zalewska

    The decision took effect as of that day.



    14. Rise in violence and the deepening humanitarian crisis in South Sudan (debate)

    Commission statement: Rise in violence and the deepening humanitarian crisis in South Sudan (2025/2751(RSP))

    Ekaterina Zaharieva (Member of the Commission) made the statement.

    The following spoke: Michael Gahler, on behalf of the PPE Group, Marit Maij, on behalf of the S&D Group, György Hölvényi, on behalf of the PfE Group, Adam Bielan, on behalf of the ECR Group, Jan-Christoph Oetjen, on behalf of the Renew Group, Erik Marquardt, on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group, Özlem Demirel, on behalf of The Left Group, Ingeborg Ter Laak, Francisco Assis, Barry Andrews, Murielle Laurent and Leire Pajín.

    The following spoke under the catch-the-eye procedure: Alessandra Moretti, Nikos Papandreou and Sebastian Tynkkynen.

    The following spoke: Ekaterina Zaharieva.

    IN THE CHAIR: Roberts ZĪLE
    Vice-President

    The debate closed.



    15. Debate on cases of breaches of human rights, democracy and the rule of law (debate)

    (For the titles and authors of the motions for resolutions, see minutes of 18.6.2025, item I.)



    15.1. Media freedom in Georgia, particularly the case of Mzia Amaglobeli

    Motions for resolutions B10-0282/2025, B10-0283/2025, B10-0287/2025, B10-0288/2025, B10-0289/2025, B10-0290/2025 and B10-0295/2025 (2025/2752(RSP))

    Rasa Juknevičienė, Tobias Cremer, Małgorzata Gosiewska, Dainius Žalimas, Lena Schilling, Danilo Della Valle and Petr Bystron introduced their groups’ motions for resolutions.

    The following spoke: Liudas Mažylis, on behalf of the PPE Group, Nacho Sánchez Amor, on behalf of the S&D Group, and Thierry Mariani, on behalf of the PfE Group.

    The following spoke under the catch-the-eye procedure: Lukas Sieper.

    The following spoke: Ekaterina Zaharieva (Member of the Commission).

    The debate closed.

    Vote: minutes of 19.6.2025, item 5.1.



    15.2. Case of Ahmadreza Jalali in Iran

    Motions for resolutions B10-0280/2025, B10-0284/2025, B10-0285/2025, B10-0286/2025, B10-0296/2025, B10-0299/2025 and B10-0300/2025 (2025/2753(RSP))

    Michał Wawrykiewicz, Evin Incir, Veronika Vrecionová, Abir Al-Sahlani, Alice Kuhnke, Jonas Sjöstedt and Sebastiaan Stöteler introduced their groups’ motions for resolutions.

    The following spoke: Alice Teodorescu Måwe, on behalf of the PPE Group, Francisco Assis, on behalf of the S&D Group, Gerolf Annemans, on behalf of the PfE Group, Hilde Vautmans, on behalf of the Renew Group, Wouter Beke, Daniel Attard and Danuše Nerudová.

    The following spoke: Ekaterina Zaharieva (Member of the Commission).

    The debate closed.

    Vote: minutes of 19.6.2025, item 5.2.



    15.3. Dissolution of political parties and the crackdown on the opposition in Mali

    Motions for resolutions B10-0281/2025, B10-0291/2025, B10-0292/2025, B10-0293/2025, B10-0294/2025, B10-0297/2025 and B10-0298/2025 (2025/2754(RSP))

    Christophe Gomart, Laura Ballarín Cereza and Catarina Vieira introduced their groups’ motions for resolutions.

    The following spoke: Ingeborg Ter Laak, on behalf of the PPE Group, Marta Temido, on behalf of the S&D Group, and Reinhold Lopatka.

    The following spoke: Ekaterina Zaharieva (Member of the Commission).

    The debate closed.

    Vote: minutes of 19.6.2025, item 5.3.



    16. Digital Markets, Digital Euro, Digital Identities: economical stimuli or trends toward dystopia (topical debate)

    The following spoke: Rada Laykova to open the debate proposed by the ESN Group.

    The following spoke: Ekaterina Zaharieva (Member of the Commission).

    The following spoke: Fernando Navarrete Rojas, on behalf of the PPE Group, Aurore Lalucq, on behalf of the S&D Group, Piotr Müller, on behalf of the ECR Group, Billy Kelleher, on behalf of the Renew Group, Sergey Lagodinsky, on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group, Jussi Saramo, on behalf of The Left Group, Siegbert Frank Droese, on behalf of the ESN Group, Lídia Pereira, Stefano Cavedagna, Katri Kulmuni, Damian Boeselager, Milan Mazurek, Fabio De Masi, Paulius Saudargas, Marlena Maląg, Diego Solier, Gheorghe Piperea, Dick Erixon and Claudiu-Richard Târziu.

    The following spoke: Ekaterina Zaharieva.

    The debate closed.



    17. Oral explanations of votes (Rule 201)

    No oral explanations of votes were made.



    18. Explanations of votes in writing (Rule 201)

    Explanations of votes given in writing would appear on the Members’ pages on Parliament’s website



    19. Agenda of the next sitting

    The next sitting would be held the following day, 19 June 2025, starting at 09:00. The agenda was available on Parliament’s website.



    20. Approval of the minutes of the sitting

    In accordance with Rule 208(3), the minutes of the sitting would be put to the House for approval at the beginning of the afternoon of the next sitting.



    21. Closure of the sitting

    The sitting closed at 21:10.



    LIST OF DOCUMENTS SERVING AS A BASIS FOR THE DEBATES AND DECISIONS OF PARLIAMENT



    I. Motions for resolutions tabled

    Media freedom in Georgia, particularly the case of Mzia Amaglobeli

    The following Members or political groups had requested that a debate be held, in accordance with Rule 150, on the following motions for resolutions:

    on media freedom in Georgia, particularly the case of Mzia Amaglobeli (2025/2752(RSP)) (B10-0282/2025)
    Lena Schilling, Mélissa Camara, Mounir Satouri, Ville Niinistö, Maria Ohisalo, Mārtiņš Staķis, Nicolae
    Ştefănuță, Markéta Gregorová
    on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

    on media freedom in Georgia, particularly the case of Mzia Amaglobeli (2025/2752(RSP)) (B10-0283/2025)
    Danilo Della Valle
    on behalf of The Left Group

    on media freedom in Georgia, particularly the case of Mzia Amaglobeli (2025/2752(RSP)) (B10-0287/2025)
    Urmas Paet, Petras Auštrevičius, Malik Azmani, Dan Barna, Benoit Cassart, Veronika Cifrová Ostrihoňová, Engin Eroglu, Svenja Hahn, Karin Karlsbro, Ľubica Karvašová, Ilhan Kyuchyuk, Nathalie Loiseau, Jan-Christoph Oetjen, Marie-Agnes Strack-Zimmermann, Eugen Tomac, Hilde Vautmans, Lucia Yar, Dainius Žalimas, Olivier Chastel
    on behalf of the Renew Group

    on media freedom in Georgia, particularly the case of Mzia Amaglobeli (2025/2752(RSP)) (B10-0288/2025)
    Petr Bystron, Tomasz Froelich, Hans Neuhoff, Alexander Sell
    on behalf of the ESN Group

    on media freedom in Georgia, particularly the case of Mzia Amaglobeli (2025/2752(RSP)) (B10-0289/2025)
    Yannis Maniatis, Francisco Assis, Tobias Cremer
    on behalf of the S&D Group

    on media freedom in Georgia, particularly the case of Mzia Amaglobeli (2025/2752(RSP)) (B10-0290/2025)
    Sebastião Bugalho, David McAllister, Željana Zovko, Isabel Wiseler-Lima, Tomas Tobé, Miriam Lexmann, Andrey Kovatchev, Michał Wawrykiewicz, Dariusz Joński, Loránt Vincze, Danuše Nerudová, Mirosława Nykiel, Antonio López-Istúriz White, Davor Ivo Stier, Luděk Niedermayer, Ingeborg Ter Laak, Liudas Mažylis, Inese Vaidere, Rasa Juknevičienė
    on behalf of the PPE Group

    on media freedom in Georgia, particularly the case of Mzia Amaglobeli (2025/2752(RSP)) (B10-0295/2025)
    Adam Bielan, Małgorzata Gosiewska, Sebastian Tynkkynen, Reinis Pozņaks, Rihards Kols, Alexandr Vondra, Mariusz Kamiński, Veronika Vrecionová, Ondřej Krutílek, Waldemar Tomaszewski, Assita Kanko, Bogdan Rzońca, Arkadiusz Mularczyk, Joachim Stanisław Brudziński
    on behalf of the ECR Group

    Case of Ahmadreza Jalali in Iran

    The following Members or political groups had requested that a debate be held, in accordance with Rule 150, on the following motions for resolutions:

    on the case of Ahmadreza Jalali in Iran (2025/2753(RSP)) (B10-0280/2025)
    Jonas Sjöstedt
    on behalf of The Left Group

    on the case of Ahmadreza Jalali in Iran (2025/2753(RSP)) (B10-0284/2025)
    Alice Kuhnke, Maria Ohisalo, Mounir Satouri, Nicolae
    Ştefănuță, Mélissa Camara, Ville Niinistö, Hannah Neumann
    on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

    on the case of Dr Ahmadreza Djalali’s illegal arrest and detention in Iran (2025/2753(RSP)) (B10-0285/2025)
    Abir Al-Sahlani, Petras Auštrevičius, Malik Azmani, Dan Barna, Benoit Cassart, Olivier Chastel, Veronika Cifrová Ostrihoňová, Engin Eroglu, Bart Groothuis, Svenja Hahn, Karin Karlsbro, Ilhan Kyuchyuk, Jan-Christoph Oetjen, Urmas Paet, Marie-Agnes Strack-Zimmermann, Hilde Vautmans, Lucia Yar
    on behalf of the Renew Group

    on the case of Ahmadreza Jalali in Iran (2025/2753(RSP)) (B10-0286/2025)
    Sebastiaan Stöteler, Marieke Ehlers, António Tânger Corrêa, Nikola Bartůšek, Pierre-Romain Thionnet, Gerolf Annemans, Hermann Tertsch
    on behalf of the PfE Group

    on the case of Ahmadreza Jalali in Iran (2025/2753(RSP)) (B10-0296/2025)
    Yannis Maniatis, Francisco Assis, Evin Incir, Chloé Ridel
    on behalf of the S&D Group

    on the case of Ahmadreza Jalali in Iran (2025/2753(RSP)) (B10-0299/2025)
    Sebastião Bugalho, Michał Wawrykiewicz, Željana Zovko, David McAllister, Isabel Wiseler-Lima, Tomas Tobé, Miriam Lexmann, Andrey Kovatchev, Loucas Fourlas, Dariusz Joński, Loránt Vincze, Danuše Nerudová, Mirosława Nykiel, Antonio López-Istúriz White, Davor Ivo Stier, Luděk Niedermayer, Ingeborg Ter Laak, Liudas Mažylis, Inese Vaidere
    on behalf of the PPE Group

    on the case of Ahmadreza Jalali in Iran (2025/2753(RSP)) (B10-0300/2025)
    Adam Bielan, Reinis Pozņaks, Rihards Kols, Sebastian Tynkkynen, Mariusz Kamiński, Alexandr Vondra, Ondřej Krutílek, Veronika Vrecionová, Alberico Gambino, Carlo Fidanza, Waldemar Tomaszewski, Assita Kanko, Bogdan Rzońca, Arkadiusz Mularczyk, Cristian Terheş, Diego Solier, Nora Junco García, Michał Dworczyk, Małgorzata Gosiewska, Marion Maréchal
    on behalf of the ECR Group

    Dissolution of political parties and the crackdown on the opposition in Mali

    The following Members or political groups had requested that a debate be held, in accordance with Rule 150, on the following motions for resolutions:

    on dissolution of political parties and the crackdown on the opposition in Mali (2025/2754(RSP)) (B10-0281/2025)
    Merja Kyllönen
    on behalf of The Left Group

    on dissolution of political parties and the crackdown on the opposition in Mali (2025/2754(RSP)) (B10-0291/2025)
    Nathalie Loiseau, Oihane Agirregoitia Martínez, Petras Auštrevičius, Malik Azmani, Dan Barna, Benoit Cassart, Olivier Chastel, Engin Eroglu, Svenja Hahn, Karin Karlsbro, Ilhan Kyuchyuk, Jan-Christoph Oetjen, Urmas Paet, Marie-Agnes Strack-Zimmermann, Hilde Vautmans, Yvan Verougstraete, Lucia Yar
    on behalf of the Renew Group

    on dissolution of political parties and the crackdown on the opposition in Mali (2025/2754(RSP)) (B10-0292/2025)
    Tomasz Froelich, Hans Neuhoff, Alexander Sell
    on behalf of the ESN Group

    on dissolution of political parties and the crackdown on the opposition in Mali (2025/2754(RSP)) (B10-0293/2025)
    Matthieu Valet, Pierre-Romain Thionnet, Nikola Bartůšek
    on behalf of the PfE Group

    on dissolution of political parties and the crackdown on the opposition in Mali (2025/2754(RSP)) (B10-0294/2025)
    Yannis Maniatis, Francisco Assis, Laura Ballarín Cereza
    on behalf of the S&D Group
    Catarina Vieira
    on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

    on dissolution of political parties and the crackdown on the opposition in Mali (2025/2754(RSP)) (B10-0297/2025)
    Sebastião Bugalho, Christophe Gomart, Željana Zovko, David McAllister, Isabel Wiseler-Lima, Tomas Tobé, Miriam Lexmann, Andrey Kovatchev, Michał Wawrykiewicz, Dariusz Joński, Loránt Vincze, Danuše Nerudová, Mirosława Nykiel, Antonio López-Istúriz White, Davor Ivo Stier, Luděk Niedermayer, Ingeborg Ter Laak, Liudas Mažylis, Inese Vaidere
    on behalf of the PPE Group

    on dissolution of political parties and the crackdown on the opposition in Mali (2025/2754(RSP)) (B10-0298/2025)
    Adam Bielan, Sebastian Tynkkynen, Alexandr Vondra, Ondřej Krutílek, Veronika Vrecionová, Waldemar Tomaszewski, Assita Kanko, Bogdan Rzońca, Arkadiusz Mularczyk, Joachim Stanisław Brudziński, Małgorzata Gosiewska
    on behalf of the ECR Group



    II. Delegated acts (Rule 114(2))

    Draft delegated acts forwarded to Parliament

    – Commission Delegated Regulation amending Regulation (EU) 2024/1735 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the identification of sub-categories within net-zero technologies and the list of specific components used for those technologies. (C(2025)02901 – 2025/2733(DEA))

    Deadline for raising objections: 2 months from the date of receipt of 23 May 2025

    referred to committee responsible: ITRE
    opinion: ECON, EMPL, ENVI, IMCO, REGI

    – Commission Delegated Regulation amending Regulation (EU) 2019/125 concerning trade in certain goods which could be used for capital punishment, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (C(2025)03066 – 2025/2727(DEA))

    Deadline for raising objections: 2 months from the date of receipt of 21 May 2025

    referred to committee responsible: INTA

    – Commission Delegated Regulation amending Regulation (EU) 2019/1242 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the addition of vehicle sub-groups for extra-heavy-combination lorries (C(2025)03071 – 2025/2726(DEA))

    Deadline for raising objections: 2 months from the date of receipt of 20 May 2025

    referred to committee responsible: ENVI

    – Commission Delegated Regulation supplementing Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards measures adopted by the International Civil Aviation Organisation for the monitoring, reporting and verification of aviation emissions for the purpose of implementing a global market-based measure and repealing Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/1603 (C(2025)03075 – 2025/2725(DEA))

    Deadline for raising objections: 2 months from the date of receipt of 20 May 2025

    referred to committee responsible: ENVI
    opinion: ITRE

    – Commission Delegated Regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 273/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Council Regulation (EC) No 111/2005 as regards the inclusion of the drug precursors 4-piperidone and 1-boc-4-piperidone in the list of scheduled substances (C(2025)03079 – 2025/2729(DEA))

    Deadline for raising objections: 2 months from the date of receipt of 21 May 2025

    referred to committee responsible: LIBE

    – Commission Delegated Regulation supplementing Regulation (EU) No 600/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to regulatory technical standards on the authorisation and organisational requirements for approved publication arrangements and approved reporting mechanisms, and on the authorisation requirements for consolidated tape providers, and repealing Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/571 (C(2025)03100 – 2025/2765(DEA))

    Deadline for raising objections: 3 months from the date of receipt of 12 June 2025

    referred to committee responsible: ECON

    – Commission Delegated Regulation supplementing Regulation (EU) No 600/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to regulatory technical standards specifying the input and output data of consolidated tapes, the synchronisation of business clocks and the revenue redistribution by the consolidated tape provider for shares and ETFs, and repealing Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/574 (C(2025)03102 – 2025/2761(DEA))

    Deadline for raising objections: 3 months from the date of receipt of 12 June 2025

    referred to committee responsible: ECON

    – Commission Delegated Regulation supplementing Regulation (EU) No 600/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to regulatory technical standards on the obligation to make market data available to the public on a reasonable commercial basis (C(2025)03103 – 2025/2762(DEA))

    Deadline for raising objections: 3 months from the date of receipt of 12 June 2025

    referred to committee responsible: ECON

    – Commission Delegated Regulation supplementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1139 of the European Parliament and of the Council with detailed rules and procedures on the acceptance of air traffic controller licences and certificates issued by third countries. (C(2025)03114 – 2025/2732(DEA))

    Deadline for raising objections: 2 months from the date of receipt of 23 May 2025

    referred to committee responsible: TRAN

    – Commission Delegated Regulation supplementing Regulation (EU) 2024/1735 of the European Parliament and of the Council by specifying the rules on the identification of authorised oil and gas producers who are required to contribute to the objective of reaching the Union-target for available CO2 injection capacity by 2030, on the calculation of their respective contributions, and on their reporting obligations (C(2025)03218 – 2025/2730(DEA))

    Deadline for raising objections: 2 months from the date of receipt of 21 May 2025

    referred to committee responsible: ITRE
    opinion: ECON, EMPL, ENVI, IMCO, REGI

    – Commission Delegated Regulation supplementing Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to regulatory technical standards specifying the information in an application for authorisation to offer asset-referenced tokens to the public or to seek their admission to trading (C(2025)03221 – 2025/2737(DEA))

    Deadline for raising objections: 3 months from the date of receipt of 5 June 2025

    referred to committee responsible: ECON

    – Commission Delegated Regulation amending Regulation (EU) No 748/2012 as regards updating the references to the environmental protection requirements and correcting that Regulation (C(2025)03287 – 2025/2735(DEA))

    Deadline for raising objections: 2 months from the date of receipt of 28 May 2025

    referred to committee responsible: TRAN

    – Commission Delegated Regulation amending Regulation (EU) 2019/1241 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards geographic coordinates in Annexes VII and XIII thereto (C(2025)03293 – 2025/2734(DEA))

    Deadline for raising objections: 2 months from the date of receipt of 28 May 2025

    referred to committee responsible: PECH

    – Commission Delegated Regulation amending the Annex to Regulation (EU) No 609/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council to allow the use of monosodium salt of L-5-methyltetrahydrofolic acid as a source of folate in infant formula and follow-on formula, processed cereal-based food and baby food, total diet replacement for weight control and in food for special medical purposes (C(2025)03411 – 2025/2736(DEA))

    Deadline for raising objections: 2 months from the date of receipt of 4 June 2025

    referred to committee responsible: ENVI

    – Commission Delegated Regulation amending Regulation (EU) 2017/745 of the European Parliament and of the Council, as regards the assignment of Unique Device Identifiers for spectacle frames, spectacle lenses and ready-to-wear reading spectacles (C(2025)03484 – 2025/2763(DEA))

    Deadline for raising objections: 3 months from the date of receipt of 12 June 2025

    referred to committee responsible: SANT

    – Commission Delegated Regulation amending Regulation (EU) 2019/2144 of the European Parliament and of the Council to take into account regulatory developments concerning amendments to UN Regulations Nos 25, 34, 79, 100, 117, 127 and 152, and the new UN Regulations Nos 167, 169 and 171 adopted by the World Forum for Harmonization of Vehicle Regulations of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (C(2025)03502 – 2025/2738(DEA))

    Deadline for raising objections: 2 months from the date of receipt of 5 June 2025

    referred to committee responsible: IMCO

    – Commission Delegated Regulation amending Delegated Regulation (EU) No 876/2013 supplementing Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards changes to the functioning and management of colleges for central counterparties (C(2025)03626 – 2025/2755(DEA))

    Deadline for raising objections: 3 months from the date of receipt of 11 June 2025

    referred to committee responsible: ECON

    – Commission Delegated Regulation amending Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to the date of application of the own funds requirements for market risk (C(2025)03643 – 2025/2764(DEA))

    Deadline for raising objections: 3 months from the date of receipt of 12 June 2025

    referred to committee responsible: ECON

    – Commission Delegated Regulation on the implementation of the Union’s international obligations, as referred to in Article 15(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council, under the Trade and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community, of the one part, and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, of the other part, as regards picked dogfish (C(2025)03715 – 2025/2768(DEA))

    Deadline for raising objections: 2 months from the date of receipt of 13 June 2025

    referred to committee responsible: PECH

    – Commission Delegated Regulation amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1675 to add Algeria, Angola, Côte d’Ivoire, Kenya, Laos, Lebanon, Monaco, Namibia, Nepal and Venezuela to the list of high-risk third countries which have provided a written high-level political commitment to address the identified deficiencies and have developed an action plan with the FATF, and to remove Barbados, Gibraltar, Jamaica, Panama, the Philippines, Senegal, Uganda and the United Arab Emirates from that list (C(2025)03815 – 2025/2740(DEA))

    Deadline for raising objections: 1 month from the date of receipt of 10 June 2025

    referred to committee responsible: ECON, LIBE

    – Commission Delegated Regulation amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/530 as regards its date of application (C(2025)03819 – 2025/2766(DEA))

    Deadline for raising objections: 2 months from the date of receipt of 12 June 2025

    referred to committee responsible: INTA



    ATTENDANCE REGISTER

    Present:

    Aaltola Mika, Abadía Jover Maravillas, Adamowicz Magdalena, Aftias Georgios, Agirregoitia Martínez Oihane, Agius Peter, Agius Saliba Alex, Alexandraki Galato, Allione Grégory, Al-Sahlani Abir, Anadiotis Nikolaos, Anderson Christine, Andersson Li, Andresen Rasmus, Andrews Barry, Andriukaitis Vytenis Povilas, Androuët Mathilde, Angel Marc, Annemans Gerolf, Annunziata Lucia, Antoci Giuseppe, Arias Echeverría Pablo, Arimont Pascal, Arłukowicz Bartosz, Arnaoutoglou Sakis, Arndt Anja, Arvanitis Konstantinos, Asens Llodrà Jaume, Assis Francisco, Attard Daniel, Aubry Manon, Auštrevičius Petras, Axinia Adrian-George, Azmani Malik, Bajada Thomas, Baljeu Jeannette, Ballarín Cereza Laura, Bardella Jordan, Barley Katarina, Barna Dan, Barrena Arza Pernando, Bartulica Stephen Nikola, Bartůšek Nikola, Bausemer Arno, Bay Nicolas, Bay Christophe, Beke Wouter, Bellamy François-Xavier, Benea Dragoş, Benjumea Benjumea Isabel, Beňová Monika, Bentele Hildegard, Berendsen Tom, Berg Sibylle, Berlato Sergio, Bernhuber Alexander, Biedroń Robert, Bielan Adam, Bischoff Gabriele, Blaha Ľuboš, Blinkevičiūtė Vilija, Blom Rachel, Bloss Michael, Bocheński Tobiasz, Boeselager Damian, Bogdan Ioan-Rareş, Bonaccini Stefano, Bonte Barbara, Borchia Paolo, Borrás Pabón Mireia, Borvendég Zsuzsanna, Borzan Biljana, Bosanac Gordan, Boßdorf Irmhild, Bosse Stine, Botenga Marc, Boyer Gilles, Brasier-Clain Marie-Luce, Braun Grzegorz, Brejza Krzysztof, Bricmont Saskia, Brnjac Nikolina, Bryłka Anna, Buchheit Markus, Buczek Tomasz, Buda Daniel, Buda Waldemar, Budka Borys, Bugalho Sebastião, Buła Andrzej, Buxadé Villalba Jorge, Bystron Petr, Bžoch Jaroslav, Camara Mélissa, Canfin Pascal, Carberry Nina, Cârciu Gheorghe, Carême Damien, Casa David, Caspary Daniel, Cassart Benoit, Castillo Laurent, del Castillo Vera Pilar, Cavazzini Anna, Cavedagna Stefano, Ceccardi Susanna, Cepeda José, Ceulemans Estelle, Chahim Mohammed, Chaibi Leila, Chastel Olivier, Christensen Asger, Ciccioli Carlo, Cifrová Ostrihoňová Veronika, Ciriani Alessandro, Cisint Anna Maria, Clausen Per, Clergeau Christophe, Cormand David, Corrado Annalisa, Costanzo Vivien, Cotrim De Figueiredo João, Cowen Barry, Cremer Tobias, Cristea Andi, Crosetto Giovanni, Cunha Paulo, Dahl Henrik, Danielsson Johan, Dauchy Marie, Dávid Dóra, David Ivan, Decaro Antonio, de la Hoz Quintano Raúl, Della Valle Danilo, Deloge Valérie, De Masi Fabio, Demirel Özlem, Deutsch Tamás, Devaux Valérie, Dibrani Adnan, Dieringer Elisabeth, Dîncu Vasile, Di Rupo Elio, Disdier Mélanie, Dobrev Klára, Doherty Regina, Doleschal Christian, Dömötör Csaba, Do Nascimento Cabral Paulo, Donazzan Elena, Dorfmann Herbert, Dostalova Klara, Dostál Ondřej, Droese Siegbert Frank, Düpont Lena, Dworczyk Michał, Ecke Matthias, Ehler Christian, Ehlers Marieke, Eriksson Sofie, Erixon Dick, Eroglu Engin, Estaràs Ferragut Rosa, Everding Sebastian, Falcă Gheorghe, Falcone Marco, Farreng Laurence, Farský Jan, Ferber Markus, Ferenc Viktória, Fernández Jonás, Fidanza Carlo, Fiocchi Pietro, Firmenich Ruth, Flanagan Luke Ming, Fourlas Loucas, Fourreau Emma, Fragkos Emmanouil, Freund Daniel, Fritzon Heléne, Froelich Tomasz, Fuglsang Niels, Funchion Kathleen, Furet Angéline, Furore Mario, Gahler Michael, Gál Kinga, Galán Estrella, Gálvez Lina, Gambino Alberico, García Hermida-Van Der Walle Raquel, Garraud Jean-Paul, Gasiuk-Pihowicz Kamila, Geadi Geadis, Gedin Hanna, Geese Alexandra, Geier Jens, Geisel Thomas, Gemma Chiara, Georgiou Giorgos, Gerbrandy Gerben-Jan, Gerzsenyi Gabriella, Geuking Niels, Gieseke Jens, Giménez Larraz Borja, Girauta Vidal Juan Carlos, Glavak Sunčana, Glucksmann Raphaël, Goerens Charles, Gomart Christophe, Gomes Isilda, Gómez López Sandra, Gonçalves Bruno, Gonçalves Sérgio, González Casares Nicolás, González Pons Esteban, Gori Giorgio, Gosiewska Małgorzata, Gotink Dirk, Gozi Sandro, Grapini Maria, Gražulis Petras, Gregorová Markéta, Grims Branko, Griset Catherine, Gronkiewicz-Waltz Hanna, Groothuis Bart, Grossmann Elisabeth, Grudler Christophe, Gualmini Elisabetta, Guarda Cristina, Guetta Bernard, Guzenina Maria, Győri Enikő, Gyürk András, Haider Roman, Halicki Andrzej, Hansen Niels Flemming, Hassan Rima, Hauser Gerald, Häusling Martin, Hava Mircea-Gheorghe, Heinäluoma Eero, Henriksson Anna-Maja, Herbst Niclas, Herranz García Esther, Hetman Krzysztof, Hojsík Martin, Holmgren Pär, Hölvényi György, Homs Ginel Alicia, Humberto Sérgio, Ijabs Ivars, Imart Céline, Incir Evin, Inselvini Paolo, Iovanovici Şoşoacă Diana, Jalloul Muro Hana, Jamet France, Jarubas Adam, Jerković Romana, Jongen Marc, Joński Dariusz, Joron Virginie, Jouvet Pierre, Joveva Irena, Juknevičienė Rasa, Junco García Nora, Jungbluth Alexander, Kabilov Taner, Kalfon François, Kaliňák Erik, Kaljurand Marina, Kalniete Sandra, Kamiński Mariusz, Kanev Radan, Kanko Assita, Karlsbro Karin, Kartheiser Fernand, Karvašová Ľubica, Katainen Elsi, Kefalogiannis Emmanouil, Kelleher Billy, Keller Fabienne, Kelly Seán, Kennes Rudi, Khan Mary, Kircher Sophia, Knafo Sarah, Knotek Ondřej, Kobosko Michał, Köhler Stefan, Kohut Łukasz, Kokalari Arba, Kolář Ondřej, Kollár Kinga, Kols Rihards, Konečná Kateřina, Kopacz Ewa, Körner Moritz, Kountoura Elena, Kovařík Ondřej, Kovatchev Andrey, Krištopans Vilis, Kruis Sebastian, Krutílek Ondřej, Kubín Tomáš, Kuhnke Alice, Kulmuni Katri, Kyllönen Merja, Kyuchyuk Ilhan, Lagodinsky Sergey, Lakos Eszter, Lalucq Aurore, Lange Bernd, Langensiepen Katrin, Laššáková Judita, László András, Latinopoulou Afroditi, Laurent Murielle, Laureti Camilla, Laykova Rada, Lazarov Ilia, Lazarus Luis-Vicențiu, Le Callennec Isabelle, Leggeri Fabrice, Lenaers Jeroen, Leonardelli Julien, Lewandowski Janusz, Lexmann Miriam, Liese Peter, Lins Norbert, Loiseau Nathalie, Løkkegaard Morten, Lopatka Reinhold, López Javi, López Aguilar Juan Fernando, López-Istúriz White Antonio, Lövin Isabella, Lucano Mimmo, Luena César, Łukacijewska Elżbieta Katarzyna, Lupo Giuseppe, McAllister David, Madison Jaak, Maestre Cristina, Magoni Lara, Magyar Péter, Maij Marit, Maląg Marlena, Mandl Lukas, Maniatis Yannis, Mantovani Mario, Maran Pierfrancesco, Marczułajtis-Walczak Jagna, Maréchal Marion, Mariani Thierry, Marino Ignazio Roberto, Marquardt Erik, Martín Frías Jorge, Martins Catarina, Martusciello Fulvio, Marzà Ibáñez Vicent, Mato Gabriel, Matthieu Sara, Mavrides Costas, Mayer Georg, Mazurek Milan, Mažylis Liudas, McNamara Michael, Mebarek Nora, Mehnert Alexandra, Meimarakis Vangelis, Meleti Eleonora, Mendes Ana Catarina, Mendia Idoia, Mertens Verena, Mesure Marina, Metsola Roberta, Metz Tilly, Mikser Sven, Milazzo Giuseppe, Millán Mon Francisco José, Minchev Nikola, Miranda Paz Ana, Molnár Csaba, Montero Irene, Montserrat Dolors, Morace Carolina, Morano Nadine, Moreira de Sá Tiago, Moreno Sánchez Javier, Moretti Alessandra, Motreanu Dan-Ştefan, Mularczyk Arkadiusz, Müller Piotr, Mullooly Ciaran, Mureşan Siegfried, Muşoiu Ştefan, Nagyová Jana, Nardella Dario, Navarrete Rojas Fernando, Negrescu Victor, Nemec Matjaž, Nerudová Danuše, Nesci Denis, Neuhoff Hans, Neumann Hannah, Nevado del Campo Elena, Nica Dan, Niebler Angelika, Niedermayer Luděk, Niinistö Ville, Nikolaou-Alavanos Lefteris, Nikolic Aleksandar, Ní Mhurchú Cynthia, Noichl Maria, Nordqvist Rasmus, Novakov Andrey, Nykiel Mirosława, Obajtek Daniel, Ódor Ľudovít, Oetjen Jan-Christoph, Oliveira João, Olivier Philippe, Omarjee Younous, Ondruš Branislav, Ó Ríordáin Aodhán, Orlando Leoluca, Ozdoba Jacek, Paet Urmas, Pajín Leire, Palmisano Valentina, Panayiotou Fidias, Papadakis Kostas, Papandreou Nikos, Pappas Nikos, Pascual de la Parte Nicolás, Paulus Jutta, Pedro Ana Miguel, Pedulla’ Gaetano, Pellerin-Carlin Thomas, Peltier Guillaume, Penkova Tsvetelina, Pennelle Gilles, Pereira Lídia, Peter-Hansen Kira Marie, Petrov Hristo, Picaro Michele, Picierno Pina, Picula Tonino, Piera Pascale, Pietikäinen Sirpa, Pimpie Pierre, Piperea Gheorghe, de la Pisa Carrión Margarita, Polato Daniele, Polfjärd Jessica, Popescu Virgil-Daniel, Pozņaks Reinis, Prebilič Vladimir, Princi Giusi, Protas Jacek, Pürner Friedrich, Rackete Carola, Radev Emil, Radtke Dennis, Rafowicz Emma, Ratas Jüri, Razza Ruggero, Rechagneux Julie, Regner Evelyn, Repasi René, Repp Sabrina, Ressler Karlo, Reuten Thijs, Riba i Giner Diana, Ricci Matteo, Ridel Chloé, Riehl Nela, Ripa Manuela, Rodrigues André, Roth Neveďalová Katarína, Rougé André, Ruissen Bert-Jan, Ruotolo Sandro, Rzońca Bogdan, Saeidi Arash, Salini Massimiliano, Salis Ilaria, Salla Aura, Sánchez Amor Nacho, Sanchez Julien, Sancho Murillo Elena, Saramo Jussi, Sardone Silvia, Šarec Marjan, Sargiacomo Eric, Satouri Mounir, Saudargas Paulius, Sbai Majdouline, Sberna Antonella, Schaldemose Christel, Schaller-Baross Ernő, Schenk Oliver, Scheuring-Wielgus Joanna, Schieder Andreas, Schilling Lena, Schneider Christine, Schnurrbusch Volker, Schwab Andreas, Scuderi Benedetta, Seekatz Ralf, Sell Alexander, Serrano Sierra Rosa, Serra Sánchez Isabel, Sidl Günther, Sienkiewicz Bartłomiej, Sieper Lukas, Singer Christine, Sinkevičius Virginijus, Sjöstedt Jonas, Śmiszek Krzysztof, Smith Anthony, Smit Sander, Sokol Tomislav, Solier Diego, Solís Pérez Susana, Sommen Liesbet, Sonneborn Martin, Sorel Malika, Sousa Silva Hélder, Søvndal Villy, Squarta Marco, Staķis Mārtiņš, Stancanelli Raffaele, Ștefănuță Nicolae, Steger Petra, Stier Davor Ivo, Storm Kristoffer, Stöteler Sebastiaan, Stoyanov Stanislav, Strada Cecilia, Streit Joachim, Strik Tineke, Strolenberg Anna, Sturdza Şerban Dimitrie, Stürgkh Anna, Sypniewski Marcin, Szczerba Michał, Szekeres Pál, Tamburrano Dario, Tânger Corrêa António, Tarquinio Marco, Tarr Zoltán, Târziu Claudiu-Richard, Tavares Carla, Tegethoff Kai, Temido Marta, Teodorescu Georgiana, Teodorescu Måwe Alice, Terheş Cristian, Ter Laak Ingeborg, Terras Riho, Tertsch Hermann, Thionnet Pierre-Romain, Timgren Beatrice, Tinagli Irene, Tobback Bruno, Tobé Tomas, Tolassy Rody, Tomac Eugen, Tomašič Zala, Tomaszewski Waldemar, Tomc Romana, Tonin Matej, Toom Jana, Topo Raffaele, Torselli Francesco, Tosi Flavio, Toussaint Marie, Tovaglieri Isabella, Toveri Pekka, Tridico Pasquale, Trochu Laurence, Tsiodras Dimitris, Tudose Mihai, Turek Filip, Tynkkynen Sebastian, Uhrík Milan, Ušakovs Nils, Vaidere Inese, Valchev Ivaylo, Vălean Adina, Valet Matthieu, Van Brempt Kathleen, Vandendriessche Tom, Van Dijck Kris, Van Lanschot Reinier, Van Leeuwen Jessika, Vannacci Roberto, Van Overtveldt Johan, Van Sparrentak Kim, Varaut Alexandre, Vasconcelos Ana, Vasile-Voiculescu Vlad, Vautmans Hilde, Vedrenne Marie-Pierre, Ventola Francesco, Verheyen Sabine, Verougstraete Yvan, Veryga Aurelijus, Vešligaj Marko, Vicsek Annamária, Vieira Catarina, Vigenin Kristian, Vilimsky Harald, Vind Marianne, Vistisen Anders, Vivaldini Mariateresa, Volgin Petar, von der Schulenburg Michael, Vondra Alexandr, Voss Axel, Vozemberg-Vrionidi Elissavet, Vrecionová Veronika, Vázquez Lázara Adrián, Waitz Thomas, Walsh Maria, Walsmann Marion, Warborn Jörgen, Warnke Jan-Peter, Wąsik Maciej, Wawrykiewicz Michał, Wcisło Marta, Wechsler Andrea, Weimers Charlie, Werbrouck Séverine, Wiezik Michal, Winkler Iuliu, Winzig Angelika, Wiseler-Lima Isabel, Wiśniewska Jadwiga, Wölken Tiemo, Wolters Lara, Yar Lucia, Yon-Courtin Stéphanie, Zacharia Maria, Zajączkowska-Hernik Ewa, Zalewska Anna, Žalimas Dainius, Zan Alessandro, Zarzalejos Javier, Zdechovský Tomáš, Zdrojewski Bogdan Andrzej, Zijlstra Auke, Zīle Roberts, Zingaretti Nicola, Złotowski Kosma, Zoido Álvarez Juan Ignacio, Zovko Željana

    Excused:

    Burkhardt Delara, Friis Sigrid, Hazekamp Anja, Kemp Martine

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Ready-To-Eat Chicken Fettuccine Alfredo Recalled

    Source: US State of Rhode Island

    The Rhode Island Department of Health (RIDOH) is advising consumers that FreshRealm is recalling chicken fettuccine alfredo products that may be adulterated with an outbreak strain of Listeria monocytogenes (Lm). The company is recalling the following products, produced before June 17, 2025:

    — 32.8-oz. tray packages containing “MARKETSIDE GRILLED CHICKEN ALFREDO WITH FETTUCCINE Tender Pasta with Creamy Alfredo Sauce, White Meat Chicken and Shaved Parmesan Cheese” with best-by date 06/27/25 or prior. — 12.3 oz. tray packages containing “MARKETSIDE GRILLED CHICKEN ALFREDO WITH FETTUCCINE Tender Pasta with Creamy Alfredo Sauce, White Meat Chicken, Broccoli and Shaved Parmesan Cheese” with best-by date 06/26/25 or prior. — 12.5 oz. tray packages containing “HOME CHEF Heat & Eat Chicken Fettuccine Alfredo with pasta, grilled white meat chicken, and Parmesan cheese” with best-by date 06/19/25 or prior.

    These ready-to-eat products were shipped to Kroger and Walmart retail locations nationwide.

    The products bear the USDA mark of inspection on the product label as well as establishment numbers “EST. P-50784,” “EST. P-47770,” or “EST. P-47718” printed on the side of the packaging.

    Public health officials are investigating an outbreak of Lm that currently includes 17 ill people in 13 states. (No illnesses have been identified in Rhode Island.) As of June 17, 2025, there have been three reported deaths and one fetal loss associated with this outbreak. More information is available from the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

    Consumption of food contaminated with Lm can cause listeriosis, a serious infection that primarily affects older adults, people with weakened immune systems, and pregnant women and their newborns. Less commonly, people outside these risk groups are affected. Listeriosis can cause fever, muscle aches, headache, stiff neck, confusion, loss of balance, and convulsions sometimes preceded by diarrhea or other gastrointestinal symptoms. An invasive infection spreads beyond the gastrointestinal tract. In pregnant women, the infection can cause miscarriages, stillbirths, premature delivery or life-threatening infection of the newborn. In addition, serious and sometimes fatal infections in older adults and people with weakened immune systems. Listeriosis is treated with antibiotics. People in the higher-risk categories who experience flu-like symptoms within two months after eating contaminated food should seek medical care and tell the health care provider about eating the contaminated food.

    Consumers who have purchased these products are urged not to consume them. These products should be thrown away or returned to the place of purchase.

    ###

    MIL OSI USA News