Category: Environment

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Wetlands and coastal protection

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    Case study

    Wetlands and coastal protection

    Wetlands can act as natural buffers to reduce wave energy.

    Steart Marshes, Steart, Somerset. Image credit Environment Agency

    Natural coastal protection and risk reduction by intertidal wetlands

    Iris Möller1 and Tom Spencer2

    1 Department of Geography, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland

    2 Cambridge Coastal Research Unit, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom

    Natural flood management (NFM) protects, restores or emulates the natural functions of rivers, floodplains, catchments and the coast to reduce flooding and coastal erosion. It can take the form of wetland restoration. Wetlands can be very beneficial for reducing flood risks while also providing wider environmental benefits.

    Research from the Cambridge Coastal Research Unit (CCRU) demonstrated the critical role that coastal wetlands play as natural buffers against storm impacts. This work not only transformed understanding and attitudes toward coastal ecosystems, but has influenced policy and practice.

    Impact

    The findings from CCRU helped to shift the narrative on coastal management. The UK Climate Change Risk Assessment (CCRA2) highlighted flooding and coastal change as the highest climate risk for the UK, and identified an urgent need for effective, sustainable solutions. With rising sea levels projected to impact approximately 1,000km (20%) of England’s coastal defences by 2100, reliance solely on hard engineering is becoming increasingly untenable (Environment Agency, 2024).

    The CCRU’s extensive research provided compelling evidence that coastal wetlands, such as salt marshes, significantly dissipated wave energy during storms, and by doing so helped to protect coastal communities and infrastructure. By acting as natural barriers, these ecosystems reduce the wave heights that reach man-made structures, either decreasing the need for hard engineering solutions or the cost of their construction and maintenance where they are needed.

    The CCRU’s work was pivotal in advocating for the policy of ‘managed realignment.’ This strategy promotes restoring natural habitats by allowing the coastline to adjust in a way that benefits both the environment and human communities. By creating new habitat areas and reducing maintenance costs associated with artificial defences, managed realignment represents an approach to coastal management that aligns with both ecological and economic goals.

    Through field campaigns and experimental research, the CCRU quantified the extent to which wave energy is mitigated by coastal wetlands. Studies conducted in Essex estuaries and Morecambe Bay found that salt marshes can reduce wave heights by 15-20% during extreme storms, enhancing the stability of adjacent infrastructure. This research considered various factors, including water depth, wave height, vegetation type, and sediment characteristics, providing a nuanced understanding of how these ecosystems offer coastal protection.

    Experiments conducted in the world’s longest wave flume illustrated that even a 40 metre wide band of salt marsh can effectively lower storm wave heights, with a notable percentage of this reduction attributed to the plants and the stable sediment they create. This evidence was important for informing coastal management practices and illustrating the benefits of preserving and restoring natural habitats.

    In 2017 the Environment Agency published the ‘Working with natural processes evidence directory for flood and coastal risk management’ and it was updated in 2024. These publications referenced field and laboratory work from this research which demonstrated that saltmarshes can reduce wave heights under extreme wave and water level conditions.

    Principal Scientist, Flood & Coastal Risk Management Research, Environment Agency (2017) said:

    This evidence [from the CCRU] has been very important in helping [the Environment Agency] develop and publish our Natural Flood Management evidence base…to mainstream more natural approaches to flood and coastal erosion risk management.

    In addition to influencing policy, the CCRU has developed models and visualisation tools to help coastal managers understand and implement natural coastal protection strategies. By integrating scientific research with practical applications, these tools empower decision-makers to incorporate wetlands into coastal defence plans.

    Head of People Conservation Science, RSPB (2020) said:

    I can confidently say that research by the Cambridge Coastal Research Unit (CCRU) has provided the critical scientific underpinning for RSPB positions on natural coastal protection and coastal habitat restoration, allowing us to advocate for and secure improvements to government coastal management policies. This helps in advocacy of the benefits of our managed realignment coastal habitat work at sites such as Titchwell, Wallasea Island and Medmerry.

    The work of the CCRU has thus emphasised the importance of viewing coastal wetlands not merely as natural environments but as essential components of flooding and erosion management strategies.

    Resources 

    Christie, E.K., Spencer, T., Owen, D., McIvor, A.L., Möller, I., and Viavattene, C. (2018). Regional coastal flood risk assessment for a tidally dominant, natural coastal setting: North Norfolk, southern North Sea. Coastal Engineering, 134, 177-190. Available at: 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2017.05.003 (Accessed: 24 March 2025).

    Environment Agency. (2024). National assessment of flood and coastal erosion risk in England 2024. Available at: National assessment of flood and coastal erosion risk in England 2024 (Accessed: 24 March 2025).

    Kiesel J., Schuerch M., Christie E.K., Möller I., Spencer T., and Vafeidis A.T. (2020). Effective design of managed realignment schemes can reduce coastal flood risks. Estuarine, Coastal Shelf Science 242, 106844 Available at: doi: 10.1016/j.ecss.2020.106844 (Accessed 24 March 2025).

    Möller I., and Spencer T. (2002). Wave dissipation over macro-tidal saltmarshes: Effects of marsh edge typology and vegetation change. Journal of Coastal Res., SI 36, 506-521. Available at: doi: 10.2112/1551-5036-36.sp1.506 (Accessed: 24 March 2025).

    Möller, I. (2006). Quantifying saltmarsh vegetation and its effect on wave height dissipation: results from a UK East coast saltmarsh. Journal of Estuarine, Coastal, and Shelf Sciences, 69, 337-351. Available at: doi:10.1016/j.ecss.2006.05.003 (Accessed: 24 March 2025).

    Möller I., Kudella M., Rupprecht F., Spencer T., Paul M., van Wesenbeeck B.K., Wolters G., Jensen K., Bouma T.J., Miranda-Lange M., and Schimmels S. (2014). Wave attenuation over coastal salt marshes under storm surge conditions. Nature Geoscience, 7, 727–731 Available at: doi: 10.1038/ngeo2251 https://www.nature.com/articles/ngeo2251 (Accessed: 24 March 2025).

    Möller, I. (2018). The storm is over. Available at: Salt Marshes under Extreme Waves – An EU Hydralab+ project (Accessed: 24 March 2025).

    Rupprecht, F., Möller I., Paul, M., Kudella, M., Spencer, T., van Wesenbeeck, B.K., Wolters, G., Jensen, K., Bouma, T.J., Miranda-Lange, M., and Schimmels, S. (2017). Vegetation-wave interactions in salt marshes under storm surge conditions. Ecological Engineering, 100, 301-315. Available at: doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.12.030 (Accessed: 24 March 2025).

    UNISDR Scientific and Technical Advisory Group Case Studies. (2014). Recognising Natural Coastal Protection and Risk Reduction by Intertidal Wetlands. Available at: Prevention Web – Spencer Coastal Protection (Accessed: 24 March 2025).

    Funder 

    1993 to 1996: PhD Studentship to IM: Natural Environment Research Council with Environment Agency (NERC Studentship No. GT4/93/7/P), UK, and Magdalene College Cambridge Scholarship.

    2000 to 2004: Effect of salt marsh edge morphology and vegetation cover on wave attenuation EA R&D Project W5B-022.

    2004 to 2005: Relationships between vegetation characteristics and sea defence value of saltmarshes RGS/EPSRC Geographical Research Grant

    2011 to 2013: Wave dissipation and transformation over coastal vegetation under extreme hydrodynamic loading (EU HYDRALAB IV, flume project with Universities of Hamburg and Hannover (Germany), NIOZ and Deltares (NL)). EU FP7 Integrating Activity HYDRALAB IV, Contract No. 261529

    2013 to 2014: Coastal ecosystems as a form of coastal defence, Newton Trust, Cambridge.

    2014 to 2018: Foreshore Assessment using Space Technology (FAST) EU 7th Framework Prog. SP1-Cooper., FP7-SPACE-2013-1 (collaborator), Grant no. 607131, (£451K)

    2018: Hydralab+ RESIST: EU Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (654110, HYDRALAB+).

    2016 to 2020: Physical and biological dynamic coastal processes and their role in coastal recovery (BLUE-coast); NERC (Directed Research Programme; Grant NE/N015878/1) (collaboration with 9 other organisations)

    2016 to 2020: Valuing the contribution which COASTal habitats make to human health and WEllBeing, with a focus on the alleviation of natural hazards (CoastWEB) NERC (Directed Research Programme; Grant NE/N013573/1 (collaboration with 7 other organisations)

    2018 to 2021: Response of Ecologically-mediated Shallow Intertidal Shores and their Transitions to extreme hydrodynamic forcing in UK settings (RESIST-UK), NERC Standard Research Grant (collaborators: British Geological Survey, Queen Mary University London) Grant no: NE/R01082X/1

    2023 to 2028: REWilding and Restoration of InterTidal sediment Ecosystems for carbon sequestration, climate adaptation and biodiversity support (REWRITE). Lead: Nantes University. EU HORIZON-CL5-2022-D1-02 funding call.

    2023 to 2028: Nature-based solutions for climate-resilient, nature-positive, and socially just communities in diverse landscapes (NATURESCAPES). Lead: Utrecht University. EU HORIZON-CL6-2022-COMMUNITIES-01.

    Research period  

    • 2000 – ongoing

    Impact period  

    • 2013 – ongoing

    Impact country  

    • UK

    • USA

    • Europe

    Contributing to the areas of research interest

    • 5 – Asset management

    Updates to this page

    Published 4 April 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Investing millions in safety and infrastructure on our roads for the year ahead

    Source: Scotland – City of Edinburgh

    Councillors have agreed to take forward an ambitious suite of infrastructure and road safety works in the coming year, worth over £30m.

    The Roads and Infrastructure Investment – Capital Delivery Priorities for 2025/26 spreads the capital budget of £25.686m across six different work streams.

    Carriageways and footways will receive £18.161m and focus on repairing roads and pavements. Street lighting and traffic signals have £1.220m, which will be used to maintain and improve this network. Road structures take £1.545m and focusses on our road bridges, foot bridges, underpasses, tunnels and gantries. Our road operations will get £2.460m and encompasses drainage repairs, bus stop maintenance and surface enhancement. Other asset management and miscellaneous spending amounts to £2.3m.

    The additional £12.5m of funding agreed in February’s budget has been integrated into the programme to improve paths, pavements and road conditions. An extra £12.5m of funding was also agreed last year, with a record 460,000m2 of carriageways and 52,000m2 of footways receiving treatment in that period. The Council’s Road Condition Indicator (RCI), which signifies the percentage of roads that should be considered for investment, also saw a significant improvement in 2024/25.

    We’ll look to build on these results in the coming year by undertaking a combination of carriageway strengthening, carriageway resurfacing, carriageway surface treatment, footway asphalt, footway flags and footway slurry sealing.

    The report also outlines our Street Lighting Programme and looks further ahead to our Setted Street Priorities in the next six financial years with Frederick Street, Victoria Street and the Shore all featuring for refurbishment.

    Our Road Safety Delivery Plan 2025/26 allocates over £6m across the service. As part of this, the Road Safety team will address concerns around the Dalmahoy Junction and prioritise infrastructure improvements for safe school travel, including additional pedestrian crossings.

    There will also be provision for Accident Investigation and Prevention (AIP), speed reduction measures and new 30mph and 20mph speed limit reductions over this and the forthcoming year. A full breakdown can be found in Appendix 2 of the report. Road safety progress will be reported to Committee in October, following elected member workshops to drive forward existing priority projects.

    These allocations are driven by our main priorities in the year ahead to promote road safety, study road accidents, review our vacant school crossing sites, take preventative measures and offer information, advice and practical training to road users.

    Transport and Environment Convener, Councillor Stephen Jenkinson said:

    I’m really pleased that these two ambitious and wide-reaching reports have been agreed.

    Our residents have made it abundantly clear that they want and expect continued investment in our roads network. Road safety also goes hand in hand with road condition and investment, with roads that are better maintained equalling safer roads for our children and young people. This is what I’m committed to delivering.

    From carriageway strengthening in Corstorphine and surface treatment in Seafield, to street lighting in Leith and road safety education in Ratho, we’re focussed on fulfilling our commitments and getting to work for the people of Edinburgh.

    A list of definitions for treatment specifications mentioned above in the Roads and Infrastructure Investment – Capital Delivery Priorities for 2025/26 report are below.

    Carriageway Strengthening: A substantial treatment with a minimum depth of 100mm. This includes removal of the surfacing and base course of the carriageway. Deeper excavations may be required depending on existing condition. Deeper excavations are required a bus stops.

    Carriageway Resurfacing: This treatment removes the surface course only. The depth of treatment is generally 40-50mm.

    Carriageway Surface Treatment: A preventative maintenance treatment. A thin treatment that is designed to slow deterioration of the carriageway. It is used primarily on carriageways that are starting to deteriorate. CEC uses two surface treatments: Surface Dressing and Micro Asphalt.

    Footway Asphalt: Break out of the existing asphalt footway. Depth will be dependent on existing condition. Kerbs are generally lifted and re-set as part of this treatment.

    Footway Flags: Break out of the existing footway with flags (slabs) being installed. Generally, pre-cast concrete flags are used, however, the following material is specified in the World Heritage Site: Old Town: Caithness Stone Flags New Town: Yorkstone Flags

    Footway Surface Treatment: A preventative maintenance treatment. A thin treatment that is designed to slow deterioration of the footway.

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Mental health costs of flooding

    Source: United Kingdom – Government Statements

    Case study

    Mental health costs of flooding

    Including the impact of floods on people’s mental health for the first time.

    Family moving items after a flood. Image credit: Environment Agency.

    A method for monetising the mental health costs of flooding 

    Christophe Viavattene 1, Sally Priest 1, Jacqui Cotton 2 and Carolann Simmonds 2

    1 Faculty of Science and Technology, Middlesex University, United Kingdom

    2 Environment Agency, United Kingdom

    The Environment Agency and risk management authorities routinely include the mental health impacts of flooding in investment decisions following research published in 2021 A method for monetising the mental health costs of flooding.

    Prior to this research, investment decisions focussed on the economic damages to homes, businesses and infrastructure. Although authorities knew that those affected by floods suffered with mental health conditions, there was insufficient robust data available to develop a new method. However, in 2017, Public Health England published the results of a national study on the impacts of flooding on mental health and well-being.

    This study showed that people whose homes had been flooded suffered high levels of probable depression, anxiety and post-traumatic stress disorder. The study provided the figures needed to look at the economic damages for the first time. Subsequent studies showed these impacts could last for at least 2 years after the flood.

    Impact

    The Environment Agency project took this new data and used it to calculate the costs of the mental health impacts. These costs include treatment and medication, and loss of employment or earnings due to time off work. The project worked out the value to be £1,878 per adult per flood for shallow floods (less than 30cm of water in a home) to up to £4,136 per adult per flood for deeper, more severe floods (when water is over 1 metre deep). Deeper floods result in more possessions being lost and people being away from their homes for longer during repairs. This increases the impact on those affected, and thus increases the cost.

    Alongside the research project, Environment Agency economists created clear guidance on how to use the economic cost information for those developing business cases for flood risk projects. The guidance was published in Mental health costs of flooding and erosion.

    Resources 

    Environment Agency. (2020). A method for monetising the mental health costs of flooding. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/flood-and-coastal-erosion-risk-management-research-reports/a-method-for-monetising-the-mental-health-costs-of-flooding (Accessed: 24 March 2025).

    Environment Agency. (2021). Guidance: Mental health costs of flooding and erosion. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/mental-health-costs-of-flooding-and-erosion/mental-health-costs-of-flooding-and-erosion (Accessed: 24 March 2025).

    UK Health Security Agency. (2023). Guidance: How to recover from flooding. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/flooding-and-health-advice-for-frontline-responders/how-to-recover-from-flooding – assessment-and-management-of-mental-health (Accessed: 24 March 2025).

    UK Health Security Agency. (2023). Health effects of climate change in the UK 2023 report. Chapter 3 Climate change, flooding, coastal change and public health. Available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/657086ad746930000d488919/HECC-report-2023-chapter-3-flooding.pdf (Accessed: 24 March 2025).

    Funder 

    The research project was funded by the Flood and Coastal Erosion Risk Management (FCERM) research and development programme.  

    Collaborators  

    • Flood Hazard Research Centre, Middlesex University
    • Environment Agency 
    • Natural Resources Wales  
    • Public Health England

    Research period  

    • 2017 to 2020

    Impact period  

    • 2020 onward

    Impact country  

    • England

    Contributing to the areas of research interest

    • 3 – Funding and investment

    Updates to this page

    Published 4 April 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Working with nature to reduce flood and erosion risks

    Source: United Kingdom – Government Statements

    Case study

    Working with nature to reduce flood and erosion risks

    Evidence base on natural flood management is supporting investment decisions and informing which measures to use.

    Saltmarsh creation at Lower Otter. Image credit: Environment Agency.

    Working with natural processes evidence directory

    Lydia Burgess-Gamble1 and Daniel Hine 1

    1 Environment Agency, United Kingdom

    A key resource for natural flood management (NFM) stakeholders in the UK is the Working with natural processes evidence directory (WWNP). NFM seeks to protect, restore, and mimic the natural functions of catchments, floodplains, rivers, and coasts to reduce flooding and coastal erosion. The internationally recognised evidence directory captures what the research says about the benefits of NFM as well as providing case studies and opportunity maps. The Environment Agency first published it in 2017 with an update in 2024.

    The 2024 edition, informed by more than 700 research papers, summarises the latest evidence for 17 measures relating to river and floodplain, woodland, run-off, and coast and estuary management. Evidence of NFM has grown in recent years, building confidence in the flood risk reduction and wider benefits these approaches can bring. The updated evidence base shows that flood risk reduction and wider benefits vary across measures. It helps us to understand what works best where. It also tells us there is still more to learn about NFM, but the research gaps are closing and are more detail-orientated.

    Impact

    Growing evidence on the effectiveness of NFM has had a transformative impact on flood risk management across the UK, helping to support investment in natural solutions to increase society’s resilience to flooding, coastal erosion and climate change. 

    The evidence base underpinned the design of the Environment Agency’s £25 million fund for Natural Flood Management. The fund was announced in 2023 and runs until March 2027. It aims to reduce local flood risk while providing wider benefits to the environment, nature and society. It will accelerate new and existing opportunities to implement and fund NFM and fill knowledge gaps in the evidence base. It is benefitting 38 projects, overseen by a range of organisations.

    Following the 2017 publication, the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) invested £4 million from 2017 to 2022 through the NERC natural flood management programme. Projects funded by the programme helped to address some of the research gaps identified in the 2017 evidence directory and informed the updated version.

    The research findings from the 2017 evidence directory were also used by project teams to support NFM design within the Natural Flood Management Pilot Programme that ran from 2017 to 2021 and funded 60 projects. Learning from the pilots helped to inform the 2024 evidence base by demonstrating that NFM measures used in combination across a large area could provide flood risk reduction benefits through reduced runoff and increased water storage, in addition to other learning. It was estimated that the NFM Pilot Programme created 1.6 million cubic metres of water storage which is about the equivalent of around 670 Olympic size swimming pools (Environment Agency, 2022).  

    The WWNP evidence directory has supported local NFM projects in their design and selection of measures.

    It was referenced as a key resource to the Slow the Flow project in Calderdale. At Hardcastle Crags (Hebden Bridge) the charity group installed over 800 leaky barriers. Their research has shown that natural flood management measures can slow high water levels in a flood by between 30 and 105 minutes downstream. 

    The research also helped Stroud District Council to choose the most effective locations for floodplain reconnection as part of the Stroud Natural Flood Management Project. This project is thought to reduce flood risk to about 12 properties and has inspired discussion about further works. 

    The evidence directory enabled the Shipston Area Flood Action Group to have meaningful community and landowner discussions as part of their Natural Flood Management Project in Shipston-on-Stour. These successful discussions led to agreements and the installation of more than 850 natural flood management features including leaky wooden barriers, ponds, bunds, river restoration and tree planting. The project is thought to have reduced flood risk to more than 80 homes.  

    Beyond the UK, the findings from the evidence directory are widely referenced in the International Guidelines on Natural and Nature-Based Features for Flood Risk Management, an international guide produced by the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE).

    Resources 

    Environment Agency. (2017). Working with natural processes to reduce flood risk. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/flood-and-coastal-erosion-risk-management-research-reports/working-with-natural-processes-to-reduce-flood-risk (Accessed: 25 March 2025).

    Environment Agency. (2021). Natural Flood Management Programme: initial findings. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/natural-flood-management-programme-initial-findings (Accessed: 25 March 2025).

    Environment Agency. (2022). Natural Flood Management Programme: evaluation report. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/natural-flood-management-programme-evaluation-report (Accessed: 25 March 2025).

    Environment Agency. (2025). Working with natural processes to reduce flood risk 2024, Available at: https://www.gov.uk/flood-and-coastal-erosion-risk-management-research-reports/working-with-natural-processes-to-reduce-flood-risk-2024 (Accessed: 25 March 2025).

    UK Research and Innovation (UKRI). (2024). Driving policy innovation over decades: natural flood management. Available at: https://www.ukri.org/ (Accessed: 25 March 2025).

    Funder 

    The research project was funded by the Flood and Coastal Erosion Risk Management (FCERM) research and development programme.  

    Collaborators  

    • Environment Agency (EA)
    • Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra)
    • Natural Resources Wales (NRW)
    • Welsh Government
    • Scottish Environment Protection Agency (SEPA)
    • JBA Consulting
    • English Severn and Wye RFCC
    • Forest Research
    • HR Wallingford
    • Natural England
    • River Restoration Centre
    • Woodland Trust
    • CH2M Hill
    • James Hutton Institute
    • Lancaster University
    • Newcastle University

    Research period  

    • 2017 to 2024

    Impact period  

    • 2017 – ongoing  

    Impact country  

    • England
    • Wales
    • Scotland

    Contributing to areas of research interest

    • 8 – Integrated outcomes

    Updates to this page

    Published 4 April 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Forecasting floods with unprecedented detail

    Source: United Kingdom – Government Statements

    Case study

    Forecasting floods with unprecedented detail

    Flood forecasting with the open-source flood modelling tool High-Performance Integrated Hydrodynamic Modelling System (HiPIMS)

    Flooding December 2015, Carlisle. Image credit: Environment Agency.

    High-Performance Integrated Hydrodynamic Modelling System (HiPIMS) for flood forecasting and risk assessment

    Qiuhua Liang 1 and Huili Chen 1

    1 School of Architecture, Building and Civil Engineering, Loughborough University, United Kingdom

    Professor Qiuhua Liang and his team at Loughborough University developed the award-winning High-Performance Integrated Hydrodynamic Modelling System (HiPIMS) over 2 decades. HiPIMS is an open-source flood modelling tool formally released at presentation in 2013. It was designed to better predict and understand flooding using high-performance computing. HiPIMS provides timely and detailed flood forecasts over an entire catchment or city.

    The research filled a practical gap – forecasting highly transient flooding processes, driven by intense rainfall, dam breaks, storm surge or tsunamis. Flood predictions or forecasts are essential to assess and mitigate flood risk, and to develop effective plans for emergency response benefiting people at risk, government agencies, and other practitioners working on flood risk management (Xia, Liang and others, 2019).

    Impact 

    HiPIMS was implemented and tested for forecasting the flooding process caused by the 2015 Storm Desmond over the entire Eden Catchment of 2500km². The real-time flood forecasting system was developed by integrating HiPIMS with the Met Office’s numerical weather prediction outputs. The system was able to forecast flooding from 36‐hour weather forecasts at a 10-metre resolution in 1.75 hours. This was the first real-time forecasting of a complete flooding process induced by intense rainfall, from rainfall-runoff, river hydraulics to inundation (Ming, Liang and others, 2020).

    The output was showcased at the Royal Society’s Flooding From Intense Rainfall Programme Open Event in London on 27th November 2018, and recognised by Prof Brian Golding, the Senior Research Fellow in Weather Impacts from the Met Office, at the time as “the UK’s first real-time, high-resolution flood forecasting system of its kind”.

    HiPIMS simulated flood map for the 2015 Desmond Flood in Carlisle. Credit: Qiuhua Liang.

    HiPIMS was later embedded in the UK’s Data and Analytics Facility for National Infrastructure (DAFNI) for real-time flood forecasting through the NERC funded Flood-PREPARED and PYRAMID projects. It was also used to generate surface water flooding data to improve national infrastructure resilience in the National Digital Twin Programme (NDTP). The NDTP supports growing national capability in digital twinning technologies and processes throughout the UK.

    Outside of the UK, HiPIMS has also been used to advance flood modelling and risk mapping practice. In China, the Ministry of Water Resources’ Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research (IWHR) incorporated HiPIMS into their Integrated Flood Modelling System (IFMS) to support national flood risk mapping across approximately 500,000km², almost half of the 1.1 million km2 of flood-prone areas in the country. The research developed as part of HiPIMS benefitted hundreds of millions of people in different provinces in China through provision of detailed flood risk information to better inform mitigation strategies (IWHR, 2023).

    The Deputy Director from the Centre of Flood Control and Drought Relief at the China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research (IWHR) (2023) said:

    The numerical methods and model developed by Professor Qiuhua Liang have been directly applied to support national flood risk mapping in China. The flood risk maps have been used by the Central Government and local governments of different levels to inform flood risk management policy making and support flood protection planning and investment.

    HiPIMS was adopted by government departments in Nepal to standardize methodologies for assessing Glacial Lake Outburst Flood (GLOF) risks (Chen, Zhao and others, 2022). The tool was featured in the RAINMAN-Toolbox, supporting heavy rainfall hazard assessments in central European catchments, showcasing its versatility across different geographic contexts.

    The tool has received several awards, including the Prince Sultan Bin Abdulaziz International Prize for Water in 2024 recognising its innovation and impact. The award honours the development of pioneering, open-source, multi-GPU hydrodynamic models that support real-time flood forecasting at high temporal and spatial resolutions.

    Resources 

    Chen H, Zhao J, Liang Q, and others. (2022). Assessing the potential impact of glacial lake outburst floods on individual objects using a high-performance hydrodynamic model and open-source data. Science of the Total Environment, 806(3): 151289. Available at: doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151289 (Accessed: 24 March 2025).  

    HiPIMS-ocl Version 1 on GitHub. Available at: https://github.com/lukeshope/hipims-ocl (Accessed: 24 March 2024).

    HiPIMS-CUDA Version 2 on GitHub. Available at: https://github.com/HEMLab/hipims (Accessed: 24 March 2025).

    Loughborough University. (2025). HiPIMS history – UNESCO Chair in Informatics and Multi-hazard Risk Reduction. Available at: https://www.lboro.ac.uk (Accessed: 24 March 2025).

    Ming X, Liang Q, and others. (2020). Real-time flood forecasting based on a high-performance 2D hydrodynamic model and numerical weather predictions. Water Resources Research. Available at: doi.org/10.1029/2019WR025583 (Accessed: 24 March 2025).  

    Smith LS, Liang Q (2013). Towards a generalised GPU/CPU shallow-flow modelling tool. Computers & Fluids, 88: 334-343. Available at: doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2013.09.018 (Accessed 24 March 2025).  

    Xia X, Liang Q, and others. (2019). A full-scale fluvial flood modelling framework based on a high-performance integrated hydrodynamic modelling system (HiPIMS). Advances in Water Resources, 132: 103392. Available at: doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2019.103392 (Accessed: 24 March 2025).

    Funder 

    • UK Research and Innovation (UKRI)
    • Loughborough University 

    Collaborators  

    • China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research (IWHR) 
    • International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development (ICIMOD) 
    • UK Met Office 
    • Newcastle University  

    Research period  

    • 2013 to 2022 

    Impact period

    • 2013 to 2022 

    Impact country  

    • UK 
    • China 
    • Nepal

    Contributing towards the areas of research interest

    • 4 – Flood incident management

    Updates to this page

    Published 4 April 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Coastal morphological modelling for decision makers

    Source: United Kingdom – Government Statements

    Case study

    Coastal morphological modelling for decision makers

    Using the Coastal Modelling Environment tool to change how the UK manages coastal risks.

    Boulders used as sea defences at Happisburgh, Norfolk. Image credit: British Geological Survey.

    Coastal Modelling Environment (CoastalME)

    Andres Payo Garcia 1, Dave Favis Mortlock 2, Jim Hall 3, Robert Nicholls 4 and Mike Walkden 5

    1 British Geological Survey, United Kingdom

    2 Visiting Research Associate – British Geological Survey, United Kingdom

    3 Department of Engineering Science, Oxford University, United Kingdom

    4 Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, University of East Anglia, United Kingdom

    5 Moffatt & Nichol and Visiting Research Associate – British Geological Survey, United Kingdom

    Improved predictions are essential to quantify risks from coastal erosion and flooding. However, predicting how coastal landscapes change over decadal timescales raises challenges that don’t have solutions yet. The Integrated COASTal Sediment Systems (iCOAST) project funded by NERC from 2012 to 2016, provided essential demonstrations of new approaches to address this challenge.

    Among the tools developed through the project, the engineering tool Coastal Modelling Environment (CoastalME) stood out. It is being used in the UK and internationally. It provides improved predictive capability for coastal adaptation. Modellers can use CoastalME to simulate the interaction of coastal landforms and human interventions for open coast systems. This enables users to model and visualise coastal landscape changes more effectively using commonly available spatial data. CoastalME is freely available, making it an accessible resource.

    This research has resulted in significant changes in the way that the UK manages coastal risks. It enables better-informed use of the limited amount of coastal-aggregate material – the foundation of the human-natural UK defence system against coastal flooding and erosion.

    Impact

    CoastalME is used in several projects across the UK and Europe, as a planning tool in both research and engineering contexts.

    As a research tool, CoastalME is being used in 2 multi-year NERC funded projects. The Coastal Hazards, Multi-hazard Controls on Flooding and Erosion (CHAMFER) project is a collaboration between the National Oceanography Centre (NOC), UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology (UKCEH) and the BGS which runs from 2022 to 2027.

    The tool is being used in the CHAMFER project to better assess the risk of compound flooding and erosion. CoastalME is also being used within the UKGravelBarriers project (2023 to 2027) led by the BGS. This aims to understand the effectiveness of gravel barriers in coastal protection under changing climatic conditions. Effective management of these coastal landforms is needed to ensure that they can reduce risks from coastal erosion and flooding. The role of CoastalME is to allow gravel beach and barrier dynamics to be modelled as integral components of larger coastal systems, supporting more realistic simulations under a range of climate and policy scenarios.

    Blanco and others (Environment Agency, 2019) in developing guidance for the use of coastal morphological models for decision makers found (page 74):

    The computational cost of these [CoastalME and ESTEEM] models is low and they have proved effective in exploring morphodynamic trends and improving the understanding of mesoscale behaviour. Their potential is significant as they combine different types of models and behaviours, and can therefore encompass many features over long time and spatial scales. They aim to fill the gaps where other more conventional models are not that strong. For example, CoastalME includes different sediment fractions – sand, gravel and mud. 

    As an operational tool, CoastalME is being used to inform decision making at regional, international and global levels.

    At the regional level, the tool is being used as part of the Resilient Coast (RC) Project funded by the Environment Agency’s Coastal Transition Accelerator Programme (CTAP). The RC project explores the concept of a sediment circular economy for coastal adaptation in East Anglia. CoastalME is used to quantify the sand, gravel and fine material along the coast and its value as a nature-based resource. Early results suggest that allowing a 10 metre wide section of cliff between Felixstowe and Caister to recede by 1 metre would release 1.8 million cubic metres of sand. This is equivalent to the volume imported during the largest sandscaping project to date, at Bacton, at a total cost of £21 million (Johnson and others, 2020).

    At the international level, CoastalME has been used to assess the risk of flooding and erosion for the whole of Andalusia’s coastline, which extends for 1,200km, measured at a scale of 1:25,000, and traverses 5 of 8 provinces. This study represents the first attempt to map the spatial distribution of sediment thickness along this coastal zone by integrating various publicly available datasets. It demonstrated the flexible design of CoastalME by incorporating representations of geomorphological features such as ‘ramblas’ (a dry riverbed used as a road or thoroughfare) that are important sources of sediment during heavy rainfall events.

    The European Space Agency’s Destination Earth (DestinE) initiative aims ‘to create a digital model of Earth that will be used to monitor the effects of natural and human activity on our planet, anticipate extreme events and adapt policies to climate-related challenges’ (European Space Agency). The DestinE initiative is using CoastalME as part of the Digital Twin lead component on coastal processes and extremes as a thematic module to provide 4D coastal landscape capability. The integration of CoastalME into the European Space Agency’s initiative signified that this research has the potential to impact coastal areas worldwide, providing a model for global resilience in the face of climate change.

    Resources

    Argans. (2024). Coastal Processes and Extremes – EO Based Digital Twin. Available at: https://www.argans.co.uk/proj-dtc.html (Accessed: 24 March 2025).

    British Geological Survey. (2025). CoastalME. Available at: https://www.osgeo.org/projects/coastalme/ (Accessed: 24 March 2025).

    British Geological Survey. (2025). UKGravelBarriers Project Overview. Available at:https://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk (Accessed: 24 March 2025).

    Environment Agency. (2025). Coastal Transition Accelerator Programme (CTAP). Available at: https://engageenvironmentagency.uk (Accessed: 24 March 2025).

    Environment Agency. (2024). Resilient Coasts. Available at: https://engageenvironmentagency.uk (Accessed: 24 March 2025).

    Environment Agency. (2019). Coastal morphological modelling for decision-makers. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/flood-and-coastal-erosion-risk-management-research-reports/coastal-morphological-modelling-for-decision-makers (Accessed: 24 March 2025).

    European Space Agency. (2025). Destination Earth Overview. Available at: https://www.esa.int (Accessed: 24 March 2025).

    Hall, J. (2012). UKRI – iCOAST Project Overview. Available at: https://gotw.nerc.ac.uk (Accessed 24 March 2025).

    Johnson, M., Goodliffe, R.J.W., Doygun, G., Flikweert, J. and Spaan, G. (2020). From idea to reality: The UK’s first sandscaping project. Terra et Aqua. Spring: 158. Available at: https://www.iadc-dredging.com (Accessed: 24 March 2025).

    National Oceanography Centre (NOC). (2025). CHAMFER Project Overview. Available at: https://projects.noc.ac.uk/chamfer (Accessed: 24 March 2025).

    Torrecillas, C., Payo, A., Cobos, M., Burke, H., Morgan, D., Smith, H. and Jenkins, G.O. (2024). Sediment Thickness Model of Andalusia’s Nearshore and Coastal Inland Topography. Journal of Marine Science Engineering. 12(2): 269. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse12020269 (Accessed: 24 March 2025).

    Funder 

    • Natural Environment Research Council (NERC)

    Collaborators  

    • British Geological Survey
    • Oxford University
    • University of East Anglia
    • Environment Agency
    • Moffatt & Nichol

    Research period  

    • 2012 to 2016 iCOAST, NE/J005584/1
    • 2016 to 2022 BLUEcoast, NE/N015649/1
    • 2022 to 2027 CHAMFER, NE/W004992/1
    • 2024 to 2028 UKGravelBarriers, NE/Y503265/1

    Impact period  

    • 2016 to present

    Impact country  

    • UK
    • Spain (Andalusia)

    Contributing to the areas of research interest

    • 1 – Understanding future flood and coastal erosion risk
    • 2 – Resilience and adaptation to flooding and coastal change
    • 3 – Funding and investment
    • 5 – Asset management
    • 6 – Digital technology

    Updates to this page

    Published 4 April 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Working together to adapt to a changing climate

    Source: United Kingdom – Government Statements

    Case study

    Working together to adapt to a changing climate

    Research supported authorities to work with communities when planning to reduce flood and coastal erosion risks.

    Workshop participants discussing engagement challenges. Image credit: Icarus

    Working together to adapt to a changing climate – flood and coast

    Rhys Kelly1, Ute Kelly1, Helen Bovey2, Karen Saunders2, Steve Smith2, Kate Kipling3 and Cath Brooks3

    1 University of Bradford, United Kingdom

    2 Icarus, United Kingdom

    3 Environment Agency, United Kingdom

    The Environment Agency led on the Working together to adapt to a changing climate initiative from 2018 to 2022. Through this research, there was a change in understanding how to work collaboratively with partners and communities on climate adaptation.

    The team articulated 6 challenges that exist when engaging with partners and the public about climate adaptation. Then, they co-created tools with 2 communities – Caterham Hill and Old Coulsdon and Hemsby – to address these challenges. The new knowledge and tools led to better community engagement and more effective partnerships. One of these tools underpinned the successful start to a £200 million flooding and coastal resilience programme.

    Impact

    The Environment Agency used one of the tools, the readiness assessment tool, for 25 projects under the £200 million Flood and Coastal Resilience Innovation Programme. The tool identified risks, ensured partners had the same level of understanding and aspirations, improved partnership working and enabled more partners to be involved, and earlier. This underpinned the successful start of the innovation programme.

    A Flood and Coastal Resilience Innovation Programme survey respondent (2021) said:

    Without the readiness assessment [tool] the project would probably have slipped by 6 months but [we were] able to identify this issue and change project structure.

    The Environment Agency used the readiness assessment tool on 14 projects as part of the £5.2 billion Flood and coastal erosion risk management (FCERM) investment programme. 94% of participants said that readiness assessment helped their project do things in a new, more efficient, or better way.

    The new national guidance on creating local Flood and Coastal Erosion Risk Management (FCERM) strategies led by the Environment Agency also used the readiness assessment tool. The intent was for the tool to be part of the assurance process for anyone developing a new FCERM strategy at the local level.

    A Flood Risk Engagement Advisor from the Environment Agency (2021) said:   

    …the Readiness Assessment Tool helps the Environment Agency go a step further and gather insight into how ready some of our communities are to engage around climate change. Having this information helps us to tailor our approach and meet the community [using] the right technique and with their views and challenges in mind.

    The research project also created tools for collaborative community engagement on climate change adaptation including a community readiness assessment survey, simulation and scenario development exercise. Projects in the Coastal Transition Accelerator Programme used the community survey to baseline community views and knowledge and inform engagement planning. The Making Space for Sand project in Cornwall adapted the surface water simulation to fit the coastal context.

    Measure 3.1.3 in England’s National Flood and Coastal Erosion Risk Management Strategy for England was related to the research and ensured that findings were put into practice. This included using learning in the Environment Agency’s national engagement skills development programme. The research was integral to the content of training courses such as ‘engaging in changeable and uncertain times’, which was provided to staff from the Environment Agency and other risk management authorities. It is also being used in the Environment Agency’s Working With Others training for engagement professionals.

    An engagement professional from the Environment Agency participating in the training (2025) said:

    The ‘Working together to adapt to a changing climate’ report really chimes with the ‘bottom-up’ community engagement pilot project we’re developing. Considering the 6 engagement challenges is vital if we are to work more efficiently, effectively and equitably. This report helped me to better articulate the work we’re doing and align with the business objectives of the Environment Agency.

    In 2024, the project was selected as a UK case study for the G20 in Brazil. It was presented at a Disaster Risk Reduction Working Group meeting. The G20 report recognised that “the project successfully engaged a broader cross-section of the community, ensuring that previously underrepresented voices could contribute meaningfully to planning efforts” (G20, 2024).

    Resources

    Environment Agency. (2020). National Flood and Coastal Erosion Risk Management Strategy for England. Available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5f6b6da6e90e076c182d508d/023_15482_Environment_agency_digitalAW_Strategy.pdf (Accessed: 24 March 2025).

    Environment Agency. (2021). Flood and coastal erosion risk management (FCERM) investment programme. Available at: https://environment.data.gov.uk/asset-management/downloads/capital-programme.pdf (Accessed: 24 March 2025).

    Environment Agency. (2023). Working together to adapt to a changing climate – flood and coast. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/flood-and-coastal-erosion-risk-management-research-reports/working-together-to-adapt-to-a-changing-climate-flood-and-coast (Accessed: 24 March 2025).

    Environment Agency. (2025). Coastal Transition Accelerator Programme. Available at: https://engageenvironmentagency.uk.engagementhq.com/ctap (Accessed: 24 March 2025).

    Environment Agency. (2025). Flood and Coastal Resilience Innovation Programme. Available at: https://engageenvironmentagency.uk.engagementhq.com/innovation-programme (Accessed: 24 March 2025).

    G20. (2024). G20 Compendium of Community Based Approaches to Disaster Risk Reduction. Available at: https://g20drrwg.preventionweb.net/2024/media/102073/download.html (Accessed: 24 March 2025).

    Kelly, R. and Kelly, U. (2023). Readiness assessment in flood risk management and climate adaptation: A mechanism for social innovation? Journal of Flood Risk Management. Available at: doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12915 (Accessed: 24 March 2025).

    Making Space for Sand. (2025). Making Space for Sand. Available at: https://www.makingspaceforsand.co.uk (Accessed: 24 March 2025).

    Funder

    The research project was funded by the Flood and Coastal Erosion Risk Management (FCERM) research and development programme.

    Collaborators

    • Environment Agency

    • Natural Resources Wales 

    • Surrey County Council 

    • Coastal Partnership East 

    • Icarus (as consultant) 

    • University of Bradford 

    Research period

    • 2018 to 2022

    Impact period 

    • 2021 – ongoing

    Impact country

    • England

    Contributing to the areas of research interest

    • 2 – Resilience and adaptation to flooding and coastal change

    Updates to this page

    Published 4 April 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: The interconnected risks of flooding

    Source: United Kingdom – Government Statements

    Case study

    The interconnected risks of flooding

    This research was applied to give the government, flood risk management authorities and the insurance industry a better understanding of risk.

    Image credit: Environment Agency

    Transforming flood assessment at multiple scales through better statistical understanding of risk

    Rob Lamb 1, Jonathan Tawn 2, Caroline Keef 3, Ross Towe 2, Sarah Warren 3

    1 JBA Trust and Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, United Kingdom

    2 Lancaster University, United Kingdom

    3 JBA Consulting, United Kingdom

    Research led by Lancaster University, JBA and the JBA Trust – conducted over a decade – has supported the government, flood management authorities and the insurance industry to have a better understanding of flood risk from local to national scales.

    Historically, flood risk was often assessed in isolated terms. This meant the focus was on single locations or individual flood events, rather than accounting for how extreme weather patterns can co-occur across large areas. As a result, assessments could underestimate the broader, interconnected risks of flooding.

    The research team addressed this gap by developing methods that model flood events as multivariate extremes. This allowed for a more realistic estimation of the likelihood of concurrent flooding across multiple locations. The approach enabled flood risk to be assessed at a national scale, informing decisions in the UK’s National Security Risk Assessment (NSRA) and aiding global reinsurance companies in risk evaluations.

    Multivariate Extreme Value theory

    The research breakthroughs were founded on multivariate extreme value theory. The theory addressed the probability of multiple extreme events occurring simultaneously. Prior to this research, methods were limited in scope, handling only a few variables or locations. While they were mathematically convenient, they didn’t align with real-world flood data, often leading to inaccurate risk estimates.

    To overcome this, Lancaster University researchers developed a conditional probability model that could handle a large number of variables with varied dependencies. This model demonstrated that, contrary to traditional beliefs, the probability of seeing a 1 in 100-year flood somewhere in England and Wales annually is as high as 88%.This finding underscored the need to shift from isolated risk descriptions to a more holistic framework, and recognised that a seemingly rare event locally could be much more probable when considered across a broader scale.

    Impact

    The new approach proved influential during the UK’s 2016 National Flood Resilience Review (NFRR), which was prompted by severe flooding in 2013 to 2014 and 2015 to 2016.

    UK Chief Scientific Adviser (2016) said:

    There was pressure on Government to better understand the risks involved. … Your contribution to the review was very important. Ministers were determined to base the review’s conclusions and recommendations on sound evidence and analysis… Our advice had significant influence on both the evidence and the way in which it was communicated.

    The government’s conclusions were heavily based on the research insights, which reshaped the understanding of flood risk. It also highlighted the urgency of comprehensive preparedness.

    A direct outcome of the NFRR was the government’s £12.5 million investment in new mobile flood defences, quadrupling the number of units from 2015 levels. Furthermore, a commitment to an ongoing £2.3 billion capital investment plan was secured, aiming to protect 300,000 homes. This strategic shift—grounded in more realistic risk assessments—increased the resilience of both urban and rural communities against future floods.

    Beyond the UK, these advancements have been influential globally, especially for the insurance and reinsurance sectors.

    Working with Lancaster University and the Environment Agency, JBA further refined the methods to improve their scalability and efficiency, leading to the development of the Multivariate Event Modeller tool. This open-source tool allows for joint probability analysis, making it accessible for environmental scientists and risk managers who need to analyse complex, interconnected flood events.

    The research has extended into ocean wave analysis, contributing to a better understanding of coastal extremes that compound flood risks, especially in coastal regions.

    These tools and insights have led to more accurate, data-driven assessments that can guide infrastructure planning, inform policy, and support sustainable urban development.

    Resources

    BBC News Article. (2016). Hundreds of key sites in England at Risk of Floods, dated 8th September 2016 corroborating £12.5 million investment means four times as many temporary flood barriers than in 2015. Available at: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-37306094 (Accessed: 24 March 2025).

    Environment Agency. (2017). Planning for the risk of widespread flooding: Project Summary SC140002/S. Available at https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk (Accessed: 24 March 2025).

    Grainger, J., Sykulski, A., Jonathan, P., & Ewans, K. (2021). Estimating the parameters of ocean wave spectra. Ocean Engineering, 229, Article 108934. Available at: doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.108934 (Accessed: 24 March 2025).

    Grainger, J., Sykulski, A., Ewans, K., Hansen, H. F., Jonathan, P. (2023). A multivariate pseudo-likelihood approach to estimating directional ocean wave models, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C: Applied Statistics, Volume 72, Issue 3. Available at: doi.org/10.1093/jrsssc/qlad006 (Accessed: 24 March 2025).

    Heffernan, J. E. and Tawn, J. A. (2004). A conditional approach to modelling multivariate extreme values (with discussion), J. Roy. Statist. Soc., B, 66, 497-547. Available at: doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9868.2004.02050.x (Accessed: 24 March 2025).

    HM Government. (2016). National Flood Resilience Review (NFRR). Available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/ (Accessed: 24 March 2025).

    JBA Trust. (2022). Improving statistical models of large scale flood events. Available at: https://www.jbatrust.org/ (Accessed: 24 March 2025).

    Keef, C., Tawn, J. A. and Lamb, R. (2013). Estimating the probability of widespread flood events. Environmetrics, 24, 13-21. Available at: doi.org/10.1002/env.2190 (Accessed: 24 March 2025).

    Lamb, R., Keef, C., Tawn, J. A., Laeger, S., Meadowcroft, I., Surendran, S., Dunning, P. and Batstone, C. (2010). A new method to assess the risk of local and widespread flooding on rivers and coasts. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 3, 323-336. Available at: doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-318X.2010.01081.x (Accessed: 24 March 2025).

    Multivariate Event Modeller – Github. Available at: https://github.com/jbaconsulting/Multivariate-Event-Modeller (Accessed: 24 March 2025).

    REF 2021 Impact Case Study: A step-change in the understanding and quantification of risk to improve resilience to flooding, Lancaster University, Unit of Assessment: 10, Mathematical Sciences. Available at: https://results2021.ref.ac.uk/impact/ (Accessed: 24 March 2025).

    REF 2021 Impact Case Study: Transforming Government assessments of flood risk and resilience through improved understanding of uncertainties in flood risk modelling Lancaster University, Unit of Assessment: 7, Earth Systems and Environmental Sciences. Available at: https://results2021.ref.ac.uk/impact/ (Accessed: 24 March 2025).

    Tawn, J. A., Shooter, R., Towe, R. and Lamb, R. (2018). Modelling spatial extreme events with environmental applications. Spatial Statistics, 28, 39-58. Available at: doi.org/10.1016/j.spasta.2018.04.007 (Accessed: 24 March 2025).

    Towe, R., Tawn, J. A. and Lamb, R. (2018). Why extreme floods are more common than you might think? Royal Statistical Society Journal, Significance, Vol. 15, No. 6, 16-21. Available at: doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-9713.2018.01209.x (Accessed: 24 March 2025).

    UK Parliament Statement. Written Statement UIN HLWS139 on the National Flood Resilience Review made by Lord Gardiner, 8th September 2016. Corroborates £12.5 million of spending on new temporary flood defences and a £2.3 billion investment to better protect 300,000 homes.

    Funder 

    • JBA Trust
    • Natural Environment Research Council (NERC)
    • Environment Agency

    Collaborators  

    • Lancaster University
    • JBA Trust
    • JBA Consulting
    • Environment Agency
    • Shell Research

    Research period  

    • 2004 to 2023

    Impact period  

    • 2008 to 2017

    Impact country  

    • UK

    • Globally

    Contributing towards the areas of research interest

    • 1 – Understanding future flood and coastal erosion risk

    Updates to this page

    Published 4 April 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Climate change and peak river flows

    Source: United Kingdom – Government Statements

    Case study

    Climate change and peak river flows

    Research provided vital information for planners, developers, and flood risk management authorities to prepare for future flooding scenarios. 

    Close up of a depth gauge. Credit: Environment Agency.

    Climate change impacts on peak river flows

    Alison L Kay 1, Ali Rudd 1, Matthew Fry 1, Gemma Nash 2 and Stuart Allen 3

    1 UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Wallingford, United Kingdom

    2 UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Edinburgh, United Kingdom

    3 Environment Agency, United Kingdom

    The Climate change and fluvial flood peaks research investigated how climate change affects fluvial flood peaks. The evidence is used to support sustainable development and investment in flood and coastal risk mitigation actions. The research spanned from 2018 to 2021 and was published in 2023.

    The research builds on past projects. In 2010, the early uplifts were assessed in the Regionalised impacts of climate change on flood flows, which used selected local hydrological models within a sensitivity framework. The hazard was regionalised using UK climate projections (UKCP09) in Practicalities for implementing regionalised allowances for climate change on flood flows. However, in this earlier research, the information on the impact of flooding relied on old climate projections and was based on modelling a limited number of locations.

    The release of updated UK climate projections (UKCP18) paired with new, national scale modelling methods, offered an opportunity to improve the information available for decision-making. The team combined the sensitivity framework with a national-scale hydrological model (Grid-to-Grid) and the UKCP18 probabilistic projections in the 2023 publication. This enabled a better understanding of potential changes to flood peaks across every 1km square of the river network in England, Wales and Scotland. In doing so, it helped to address the limitation that previous uplifts were derived from a limited number of specific catchment models. By using a consistent approach, the research team discovered varying sensitivities among catchments. This discovery helped predict how different regions would respond to climate-induced rainfall changes.

    Impact

    The research results had significant implications for flood risk management. The data produced provided more nuanced understanding of how flood peaks may change. This enabled the Environment Agency to update guidance for estimating future flood risks aimed at building developers and flood risk management authorities.

    The Environment Agency’s Director of Strategy and Adaptation (2021) said: “[w]e now have much more detail than ever before on how river flows will change at a catchment level, allowing us to address future flood and coastal risks more confidently.”

    The findings were integrated into national guidance for flood risk assessments. This ensured that developers accounted for climate change in their planning processes. Between April 2023 and March 2024, over 96% of planning decisions adhered to flood risk advice based on these updated guidelines, which demonstrated effective uptake of the research outputs.

    The Flood and Coastal Erosion Risk Management report: 1 April 2023 to 31 March 2024 illustrated how the guidance helped avoid potentially unsafe developments. In particular, 60,000 homes were protected through adherence to the updated flood risk advice.

    The Environment Agency’s Chief Scientist Group’s Annual Report 2022 highlighted the successful integration of research findings into operational practices.

    The insights gained from this research provided a crucial foundation for future planning and flood risk management. For those involved in planning and flood risk management, it is vital to consult the updated guidance for conducting flood risk assessments.

    Resources

    Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra). (2025). Climate change allowances for peak river flow. Available at: https://environment.data.gov.uk/hydrology/climate-change-allowances/river-flow. (Accessed: 24 March 2025).

    Environment Agency. (2016). Flood risk assessments: climate change allowances. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/flood-risk-assessments-climate-change-allowances (Accessed: 24 March 2025).

    Environment Agency. (2020). Flood and coastal risk projects, schemes and strategies: climate change allowances. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/flood-and-coastal-risk-projects-schemes-and-strategies-climate-change-allowances (Accessed: 24 March 2025).

    Environment Agency. (2021). Practicalities for implementing regionalised allowances for climate change on flood flows. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/flood-and-coastal-erosion-risk-management-research-reports/practicalities-for-implementing-regionalised-allowances-for-climate-change-on-flood-flows (Accessed: 24 March 2025).

    Environment Agency. (2021). Regionalised impacts of climate change on flood flows. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/flood-and-coastal-erosion-risk-management-research-reports/regionalised-impacts-of-climate-change-on-flood-flows (Accessed: 24 March 2025).

    Environment Agency. (2021). Managing flood risk in the face of a changing climate – Creating a better place blog. Available at: https://environmentagency.blog.gov.uk/2021/07/20/managing-flood-risk-in-the-face-of-a-changing-climate/ (Accessed: 24 March 2024).

    Environment Agency. (2023). Climate change and fluvial flood peaks. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/flood-and-coastal-erosion-risk-management-research-reports/climate-change-and-fluvial-flood-peaks (Accessed 24 March 2025).

    Environment Agency. (2023). Chief Scientist’s annual review 2022. Available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/63ff3f57d3bf7f25f76ffc9d/Environment_Agency_Chief_Scientist_s_annual_review_2022.pdf (Accessed: 24 March 2025).

    Environment Agency. (2024). Flood and coastal erosion risk management report: 1 April 2023 to 31 March 2024. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/flood-and-coastal-risk-management-national-report/flood-and-coastal-erosion-risk-management-report-1-april-2023-to-31-march-2024 (Accessed: 24 March 2025).

    Kay, A.L., Rudd, A.C., Fry, M., Nash, G. and Allen, S. (2021). Climate change impacts on peak river flows: Combining national-scale hydrological modelling and probabilistic projections. Climate Risk Management. Vol 31. Available at: doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2020.100263 (Accessed: 24 March 2025).

    Met Office. (2021). Met Office UKCP18 case study. Available at: https://www.metoffice.gov.uk/binaries/content/assets/metofficegovuk/pdf/research/ukcp/ceh_ukcp_case_study.pdf (Accessed: 24 March 2025).

    Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government. (2014). Guidance: Flood risk and coastal change. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/flood-risk-and-coastal-change (Accessed: 24 March 2025).

    Reynard, N. S., Kay, A. L., Anderson, M., Donovan, B., & Duckworth, C. (2017). The evolution of climate change guidance for fluvial flood risk management in England. Progress in Physical Geography, 41(2), 222-237. Available at: doi.org/10.1177/0309133317702566 (Accessed: 24 March 2025).

    UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology (UKCEH). (2025). Climate change impacts on river flood peaks. Available at: https://cc-flood-impacts.ceh.ac.uk/ (Accessed: 24 March 2025).

    Wasko, C., Westra, S., Nathan, R., Orr, H.G., Villarini, G., Villalobos Herrera, R. and Fowler, H.J. (2021). Incorporating climate change in flood estimation guidance – Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A. 379: 20190548. Available at: doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2019.0548 (Accessed: 24 March 2025).

    Funder

    The research project was funded by the Flood and Coastal Erosion Risk Management (FCERM) research and development programme.

    Collaborators

    • Environment Agency
    • UK Centre for Ecology and Hydrology
    • Natural Resources Wales
    • Scottish Environmental Protection Agency

    Research period

    • 2018 to 2021

    Impact period

    • 2021 to present

    Impact country

    • England
    • Scotland
    • Wales

    Contributing to the areas of research interest

    • 1 – Understanding future flood and coastal erosion risk

    Updates to this page

    Published 4 April 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: The Levee Safety Partnership

    Source: United Kingdom – Government Statements

    Case study

    The Levee Safety Partnership

    The Levee Safety Partnership brings together experts from 3 countries to focus on emerging challenges and opportunities in flood defence infrastructure assets.

    Levee safety Partnership, York 2023. Image credit: Environment Agency.

    Levee Safety Partnership

    Environment Agency (United Kingdom), Rijkswaterstaat (the Netherlands) and the United States Army Corp of Engineers (United States of America)

    The Levee Safety Partnership (LSP) is a collaboration uniting engineers and researchers from the Netherlands, the USA, and the UK. It was established after Hurricane Katrina in 2004, when the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) sought expertise from Rijkswaterstaat in the Netherlands to enhance levee safety risk management. In 2014, the Environment Agency joined the partnership.

    The Environment Agency has Memorandums of Understanding (MoU) in place with both organisations, underpinned by mutual agreement. The purpose of the MoUs is the sharing of common technical interests, and to cooperate in the development of joint activities in the field of Integrated Water Resources Management. To support this, participants exchange scientific and technical information, participate in visits and staff exchanges, run a community of practice, seminars and workshops and share best practices and lessons learned.

    Impact

    In 2024 and 2025, the research focused on surface protection specifically improving resilience and biodiversity in both vegetation and soils. This led to a collated evidence base to support improvements in seed mix, where further trials are intended before adapting current practice.

    Across 2023 and 2024 workshops helped to improve understanding on backwards erosion piping. Engagement with the International Handbook on Emergency Management for Flood Defences has led to further research to improve the evidence base behind options for emergency response to asset failure.

    The Levee Safety Partnership has raised awareness about levee safety topics, techniques, and technologies. This includes the development of the International Levee Handbook (ILH). Launched in 2013, the handbook offers international good practice on levees, based on knowledge and experience from 6 countries. It provides a guide to the evaluation, design, implementation, maintenance and management of levees and is relevant to the types of flood embankment managed by the Environment Agency, private owners and other operating authorities in the UK.

    Alongside research and development, the partnership has also supported exchanging best practice. For example, in 2017 at a meeting in St. Louis, the members evaluated a levee using methodologies from the Environment Agency, Rijkswaterstaat and the USACE. This cross-comparison evaluation led to valuable lessons and the adoption of an “American Style” assessment approach in the Netherlands.

    Staff exchanges led by the partnership have helped build capacity and develop the skills and knowledge of professionals. In 2024, a USACE member relocated to England for several months, supporting a review of asset resilience and assessment of risk. This person presented the Levee Safety Tool (LST2.0) to the Environment Agency, demonstrating how it can enhance the Environment Agency’s RAFT+ tool. Later in 2024, a member of the Environment Agency relocated to the USA for a year to focus on potential improvements to Environment Agency standards and share best practice.

    The partnership also runs an early career network. The network supports the development of younger engineers and scientists that are members of the partnership, typically within the first 5 to 10 years of their careers. It has created useful resources including country placemats describing context, governance and assessment methodology.

    The impact extends beyond the partnership. The Levee Safety Partnership regularly updates and participates in the annual International Commission on Large Dams (ICOLD) which is formed of over 100 countries and has a subcommittee on levees. Various spin-off groups have also emerged from the LSP, focusing on themes such as coastal zone management and incident management. The levee incident group is a parallel group that exists under the same Memorandum of Understanding, focused  on levee safety incident response.

    Impacts have also included a Tolerable Risk Workshop (2008 and 2020) and a ‘one levee, three methods’ assessment review, where each nation applied the other nations approach to their levee and a SWOT analysis led to considered outcomes. A similar review on the approach to climate change (resilience), as well as country governance, strategies and methodologies has helped nations to consider options. The success of the group has led to further groups of a similar nature in coastal zone management, storm surge barriers, and incident management.

    Resources

    CIRIA. (2013). The International Levee Handbook. Available at: The International Levee Handbook (Accessed: 24 March 2025).

    Rijkswaterstaat. (2024). International Handbook on Emergency Management Flood Defences. Available at: International Handbook on Emergency Management for Flood Defences (Accessed: 24 March 2025).

    Rijkswaterstaat. (2025). International Partnerships. Available at: https://www.rijkswaterstaat.nl/en/collaboration/international-partnerships/ (Accessed: 24 March 2025).

    United States Army Corp of Engineers. Levee Safety Program. Available at: Levee Safety Program (Accessed: 24 March 2025).

    Funder

    The Environment Agency research components of the LSP are  funded by the Flood and Coastal Erosion Risk Management (FCERM) research and development programme.

    Collaborators

    • Environment Agency

    • United States Army Corp of Engineers (USACE)

    • Rijkswaterstaat

    Research period 

    • Ongoing

    Impact period 

    • Ongoing

    Impact country 

    • United Kingdom

    • United States of America

    • Netherlands

    Contributing to areas of research interest

    • 5 – Asset management

    Updates to this page

    Published 4 April 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Social inequality and flood risk

    Source: United Kingdom – Government Statements

    Case study

    Social inequality and flood risk

    Flooding is a growing environmental threat across the UK, but not all communities experience its impacts equally.

    View of damage following a flood. Image credit: Environment Agency.

    Flood risk, inequalities and justice

    Gordon Walker 1 and Peter Bailey 2

    1 Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, United Kingdom

    2 Environment Agency, United Kingdom

    The Environment Agency commissioned research between 2006 and 2022 that explored the social distribution of environmental risks across England. The research found a link between social deprivation and flood vulnerability. The Environment Agency has used these findings to update its evidence base on the social distribution of flood risk and decision-making rules for investment.

    Impact

    Taken together, the research on social inequality and flood risk has influenced academic and policy understandings of not only inequalities in the distribution of flood risk, but also clear differentials in the vulnerabilities of households when flooding is experienced.

    The first report Addressing environmental inequalities: flood risk led by Gordon Walker was published in 2006. This analysis demonstrated a clear inequality in that people living in deprived communities – as measured by the Index of Multiple Deprivation – were more likely to be at risk of flooding. The pattern of risk from coastal flooding was particularly skewed towards deprived communities, with river flooding more evenly distributed (Figure 1).

    Figure 1: Total households at different levels of risk from river and sea flooding by deprivation decile within coastal areas. Credit: Environment Agency.

    These findings shaped flood policies. In 2010 the Environment Agency’s corporate indicators for flooding included an outcome measure for flood schemes of homes better protected in deprived areas (Environment Agency, 2015). Then in 2011, the Government introduced a partnership funding policy for flooding. This policy included an incentive that gave a higher rate of funding for schemes protecting homes in deprived areas from flooding (Defra, 2011).

    Published in 2011, the article Flood risk, vulnerability and environmental justice: evidence and evaluation of inequality in a UK context built upon the 2006 research. It explored the related issues of flood vulnerability and flood justice. The article has been widely cited, providing a foundation for similar analyses that have since been undertaken in the US and various European countries. It was also one of the first articles in the UK and internationally to bring flooding within an environmental justice framing.

    In 2020, the Environment Agency updated the original 2006 analysis. It used the updated Index of Multiple Deprivation as well as the latest version of the National Flood Risk Assessment (NaFRA). This version of NaFRA addressed some of the shortcomings of the 2006 analysis such as including the benefit of flood defence schemes in the flood risk exposure data. The report was published in 2022 in Social deprivation and the likelihood of flooding. The updated analysis still found evidence of flood inequalities in England.

    The findings included:

    • the size of the inequality was smaller than the 2006 study, because national flood data included flood defences and many schemes were built since 2006
    • deprived coastal communities still experienced significant flood inequalities
    • flood inequalities found within rural areas were greater than those in urban areas
    • the analysis suggested that recent investment has been relatively successful in reducing flood risk exposure inequality for the 20% most deprived areas in England

    The updated analysis and the 2022 report have been used by the National Audit Office in Managing flood risk: Report by the Comptroller and Auditor General.

    Resources 

    Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra). (2011). Flood and Coastal Resilience Partnership Funding. London: Defra. Available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a7c89f1ed915d48c2410708/pb13896-flood-coastal-resilience-policy.pdf (Accessed: 24 March 2025).

    Environment Agency. (2006). Addressing Environmental Inequalities: Flood Risk. Science Report: SC020061/SR1. Available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a7c365ced915d76e2ebbd58/scho0905bjok-e-e.pdf (Accessed: 24 March 2025).

    Environment Agency. (2015). Flood and coastal erosion risk management Outcome Measures. Progress made towards achieving the Flood And Coastal Erosion Risk Management Outcome Measures target: July 2014 to September 2014. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/flood-and-coastal-erosion-risk-management-outcome-measures (Accessed: 24 March 2025).

    Environment Agency. (2022). Social deprivation and the likelihood of flooding. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/social-deprivation-and-the-likelihood-of-flooding (Accessed: 24 March 2025).

    Environment Agency. (2024). National assessment of flood and coastal erosion risk in England 2024. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-assessment-of-flood-and-coastal-erosion-risk-in-england-2024/national-assessment-of-flood-and-coastal-erosion-risk-in-england-2024 (Accessed: 24 March 2025).

    Ministry of Housing and Local Government. (2020). English indices of deprivation. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/english-indices-of-deprivation (Accessed: 24 March 2025).

    National Audit Office (NAO). (2020). Managing flood risk – NAO report. Available at: https://www.nao.org.uk/reports/managing-flood-risk/?nab=2 – downloads (Accessed: 24 March 2025).

    Walker, G. and Burningham, K. (2011). Flood risk, vulnerability and environmental justice: Evidence and evaluation of inequality in a UK context. Critical Social Policy Volume 31, Issue 2, pp. 216–240. Available at: doi.org/10.1177/0261018310396149 (Accessed: 24 March 2025).

    Funder 

    • Environment Agency

    Research period  

    • 2006 to 2022

    Impact period  

    • 2006 to present

    Impact country  

    • UK

    Contributing to the areas of research interest

    • 8 – Integrated outcomes

    Updates to this page

    Published 4 April 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: FCERM research outcomes and impact

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    News story

    FCERM research outcomes and impact

    Research investment is making an impact in managing flooding and coastal change.

    On 4 April 2025, the Flood and Coastal Erosion Risk Management (FCERM) research and development programme published a collection of case studies. They highlight how research has been used to improve flood and coastal erosion risk management by connecting people who have operational problems with researchers who have solutions.

    The case studies cover diverse topics – from modelling with advanced technologies like digital twins, to using natural flood management measures, to applying people’s local flood knowledge and improving how we work with communities.

    The FCERM research and development programme is a collaborative partnership between the Environment Agency, Defra, Welsh Government and Natural Resources Wales. We work with partners from academia, industry and across government.

    Updates to this page

    Published 4 April 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI USA: SPC Severe Thunderstorm Watch 110 Status Reports

    Source: US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

    Search by city or zip code. Press enter or select the go button to submit request
    Local forecast by”City, St” or “ZIP” 

    SPC on Facebook

    @NWSSPC

    NCEP Quarterly Newsletter

    Home (Classic)SPC Products   All SPC Forecasts   Current Watches   Meso. Discussions   Conv. Outlooks   Tstm. Outlooks   Fire Wx Outlooks     RSS Feeds   E-Mail AlertsWeather Information   Storm Reports   Storm Reports Dev.   NWS Hazards Map   National RADAR   Product Archive   NOAA Weather RadioResearch   Non-op. Products   Forecast Tools   Svr. Tstm. Events   SPC Publications   SPC-NSSL HWTEducation & Outreach   About the SPC   SPC FAQ   About Tornadoes   About Derechos   Video Lecture Series   WCM Page   Enh. Fujita Page   Our History   Public ToursMisc.   StaffContact Us   SPC Feedback

    Watch 110 Status Reports

    Watch 110 Status Message has not been issued yet.

    Top/Watch Issuance Text for Watch 110/All Current Watches/Forecast Products/Home

    Weather Topics:Watches, Mesoscale Discussions, Outlooks, Fire Weather, All Products, Contact Us

    NOAA / National Weather ServiceNational Centers for Environmental PredictionStorm Prediction Center120 David L. Boren Blvd.Norman, OK 73072 U.S.A.spc.feedback@noaa.govPage last modified: April 04, 2025
    DisclaimerInformation QualityHelpGlossary
    Privacy PolicyFreedom of Information Act (FOIA)About UsCareer Opportunities

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: Clean-Up Of Oil Patch Off Northeastern Pulau Ubin And Changi Beach In Progress

    Source: Government of Singapore

    Leak from Langsat Terminal, Johor, stopped 

    JOINT NEWS RELEASE BETWEEN MPA, NEA, NPARKS AND SFA

    Singapore, 4 April 2025 – The Johor Port Authority has informed the Maritime and Port Authority of Singapore (MPA) that the oil leak at Langsat Terminal has stopped and that the spill clean-up at Langsat Terminal is ongoing. 

    2.       Clean-up operations for the oil patch off the northeastern coast of Pulau Ubin and along Changi Beach are ongoing. As a precautionary measure, booms will be deployed at Chek Jawa Wetlands in Pulau Ubin to protect the biodiversity-sensitive areas. The Singapore Food Agency is also working with fish farms in the East Johor Straits to take the necessary preventive measures. 

    3.       Drones and satellite imagery have been activated to monitor the surrounding waters for any additional oil patches. 

    4.       An additional oil recovery system – the Marine Oil Sweeper – has also been deployed off Pulau Ubin and is on standby in case other oil patches at sea are detected. 

    5.       The National Environment Agency (NEA) advises the public against swimming and other primary contact water activities at Changi Beach and Pasir Ris Beach until further notice. In addition, parts of the beachfront at Changi Beach Park will be cordoned off to facilitate clean-up operations. As a precautionary measure, public access to Chek Jawa Wetlands is also temporarily closed till further notice for oil spill clean-up. See NEA’s website at www.nea.gov.sg, NEA’s Facebook page, NParks’ website at www.nparks.gov.sg, and NPark’s Facebook page for the advisory. 

    6.       No other oil patches at sea and ashore have been sighted at this time. 

    7.       MPA and partner agencies continue to monitor the situation closely and will provide updates if there are significant developments.

    ~~ End ~~

    For more information, please submit your enquiries electronically via the Online Feedback Form or myENV mobile application.

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Otago Tourism School – Public lecture

    Source: Department of Conservation

    Date:  04 April 2025

    Tēnā koutou katoa

    It’s great to see so many people here interested in tourism that’s sustainable for the environment and the communities we live in.

    The Government is focused on economic growth – tourism on the land that DOC manages is a key part of that.

    I know that healthy nature and being able to operate on public conservation land with certainty, is important to many tourism operators.

    I also know you’re eagerly awaiting Ministerial decisions on the work to manage visitors better at Milford Sound.

    It’s coming – the Ministers of Tourism and Conservation are working on a paper and will be talking to their colleagues on it – and we can expect some announcements soon.

    I want to use this opportunity to take you through what DOC is doing to make sure people can get out, enjoy their time on conservation land and contribute to the economy.

    DOC’s role

    For those of you who don’t know us well, DOC manages more than a third of New Zealand’s land area, as well as hundreds of offshore islands, marine reserves, and national parks.

    We are responsible for 14,000 native species and we put a lot of effort into managing threats from predators, disease and human-related impacts.

    We also provide a huge range of visitor assets, including huts, campsites, picnic areas, shelters, bridges, toilets, and so many kilometres of tracks that, if you laid them out in a line, they would stretch from here to New York.

    We have the largest number of Treaty settlements to implement of any Crown agency – with more than 3 thousand specific obligations and commitments to working with iwi at culturally significant places.

    We operate under 25 different pieces of legislation, some of it really old and hard to navigate – for example the Wildlife Act was written 70 years ago, long before climate change was understood and before international visitor growth was a thing.

    We are also neighbours across 57,000 kilometres of land boundaries and have 17,000 kilometres of fences in our asset management system.

    So in a snapshot, we have very broad responsibilities – and we are doing it with 5% of the Government’s budget.

    We have to prioritise our work carefully because we can’t afford to do it all.

    Permissions at pace

    Many of you in this room will be interested in what we’re doing to make it easier for businesses to operate on public conservation land.

    You’re frustrated at the length of time it takes to get your permissions and concessions processed.

    I want to assure you we’re working on this at pace. It’s a major priority for our Minister; we’ve got targets we have to meet, and we are surging our effort on this.

    We need to clear the applications that are more than a year old by June this year.

    As soon as we close applications more come in, so we are also improving our systems. We don’t want numbers to creep back up and create more of a problem.

    We’re going at it hammer and tongs – we’ve got new technology coming to help us triage and track applications. So you can apply for a permit or concession online and track it in real time.

    We’re also batching up types of applications for processing and setting up panels to assess applications – so it’s faster.

    We found that processing drone applications was eating up a huge amount of our time – now we’ve worked with iwi and with our technical staff to determine in advance where drones are allowed and where the no-fly zones are.

    We now process all drone permits within a week and it’s cut down our admin time immensely.

    We’re looking to do similar things with other categories of permits.

    Part of the backlog is caused by all the layers of rules we are obliged to follow, so streamlining our legislation will be a big help – we’ve gone out for public consultation on that and advice will go to Ministers shortly.

    This is a big deal for DOC – we’re doing everything we can to shift this, to make it easier for you to work with us. It will help to grow local businesses, and we can free up time and resources to push back into conservation.

    DOC is New Zealand’s biggest tourism provider

    It’s important we get concessions right because concessionaires play an important role in the tourism system – DOC enables 1,000 tourism businesses to operate on conservation land and water.

    DOC is also the largest provider of visitor experiences in New Zealand, with over 16,000 hut beds. We enjoy hosting 64,000 walkers on the Great Walks each year.

    Conservation-related tourism is worth around $3.4 billion a year – that’s still down about $900m since before Covid, but numbers are starting to bounce back.

    Most visitors come here for our mountains, open landscapes, quirky wildlife, and unique cultural heritage.

    50% of international tourists visit national parks – a quarter of them deliberately seek out places of significance to Māori.

    80% of New Zealanders visit public conservation land each year.

    Visitor satisfaction is high, but we still have a lot to do to protect the experiences we’re promising, and make sure the environment is looked after.

    NZ’s economy needs nature

    Nature is key to the economy and if we don’t look after it, people will stop buying our products and they won’t visit.

    70% of NZ’s export earnings are from sectors that rely directly on natural resources.

    The clean air, quality soil, and fresh water that public conservation land provides are worth around $11 billion per year. [1]

    Natural and physical capital on public conservation land is worth $134 billion, and National Parks are worth $12.6 billion to New Zealanders.

    When storms take out DOC assets, your communities suffer.

    I know there’s huge frustration when tracks like Rob Roy and Blue Pools close at short notice.

    The torrential rain and floods in February 2020 which damaged more than 30 bridges and hundreds of kilometres of track, on the Routeburn and Milford tracks had a massive impact. That event, along with COVID hard on its heels, saw visitor spending in the region cut by half. [2]

    We’ve been working over the past five years to deliver a $14m flood recovery programme to restore these important visitor experiences.

    On the other hand there’s huge opportunity for conservation tourism – I know Real Journeys offers this – where people get involved while they’re out enjoying nature.

    Another opportunity is film tourism – the Lord of the Rings series has really helped send a postcard from New Zealand to the world and we should be exploring this further.

    Our economy depends on nature – but nature is in trouble.

    We have the highest proportion of threatened native species in the world – with more than 4,000 currently threatened or at risk of extinction.

    Climate change – more fires, floods and severe storms – are making the problem worse.

    We estimate it would cost around $2.3 billion per year to look after all threatened species properly and maintain healthy ecosystems to ensure their security.

    Our biodiversity budget is around $300 million – which puts us just in the ‘preventing losses’ space.

    Visitor network challenges

    When it comes to recreation – DOC has a few challenges.

    Our visitor network is large – we can only afford about 70% of it.

    We can’t replace all our existing assets as they reach the end of their useful life because we will run out of depreciation funding to replace them.

    And our construction costs are going up – in recent years we spent over $3m on the Mintaro hut and surrounding structures. It costs us 30% more now to build swing bridges in the back country than it did four years ago.

    Another challenge is to meet the growing and changing visitor demand. New Zealanders and international visitors want more accessible, shorter walks.

    Longer tramps are no longer in the top 20 activities.

    Severe weather is damaging the assets that we’ve got.

    Our spending on storm repairs has quadrupled in the past five years and 300 of our coastal assets are in the danger zone from rising sea levels.

    I know closures of key sites on the Milford Corridor like The Chasm have been frustrating for some operators and visitors.

    It’s in an area subject to extreme rainfall. We need to be confident we’re making the appropriate level of investment for the site.

    We’ve completed the geotech work and are progressing the design – but with tight resources we have to be careful.

    Likewise Tunnel Beach walkway in Dunedin suffered serious damage last year from torrential rain, and we’ve got similar issues there. Similarly Lake Sylvan near Glenorchy.

    Another emerging challenge is with social media influencers – whose photos are encouraging people to go beyond their capabilities to get that perfect insta shot.

    We’ve also seen some appalling and dangerous visitor behaviour this summer with people driving over birds nesting on beaches, and harassing sea lions to get a better photo or video.

    We’ve also had 5 fatalities this year where people have gone beyond track ends, including two recent ones in Otago.

    Responsible camping is another hot topic – the Valley of the Trolls and Brewster Glacier are the two local examples where the volume of people camping are having an impact on the sites, so we are encouraging people to camp responsibly.

    I applaud the actions being taken by the station owner at Earnslaw Station to keep the area pristine and reminding people to be respectful.

    Another issue DOC is seeing is the uneven distribution of visitors.

    Some assets are under-used with plenty having fewer than 200 visitors per year in places.

    On the other hand, some iconic locations such as Piopiotahi Milford Sound or Aoraki Mt Cook, are becoming increasingly popular, car parks are overflowing and this is negatively affecting the environment.

    We are working on how we manage numbers so the experience is safe and sustainable.

    So what are we doing about it?

    Here’s our plan for resolving some of these issues.

    There are things we can do under existing frameworks, so we’ve started.

    We’re taking a strategic approach to funding from the International Visitor Levy and investing it in ways that improves the visitor experience at our most popular places.

    For example, national parks – people come here for nature so we need to make sure nature’s sustained in those areas.

    We’re also investing in short walks – bringing tracks back up to standard, removing graffiti, re-gravelling tracks.

    We’re looking at charging for carparks and more of our huts – this improves the proportion of charges to the user, reducing the cost to all New Zealanders.

    From next summer we will pilot carparking charges at Aoraki/Mt Cook, Punakaiki and Franz Josef Glacier to help manage visitor numbers and cover upkeep costs – like other countries do.

    I’ve already told you the work we’re doing at pace to fix our permissions system.

    What’s coming

    In future we’re exploring charges to access some high-volume areas, like they do overseas, to help pay toward the upkeep of the visitor network.

    Currently we can only charge people who stay in a hut, or businesses who operate on conservation land.

    Visitors who do short walks – the most popular activity – don’t pay anything.

    We’ve been out for public consultation and overall the feedback was supportive – especially for charging international visitors more.

    On law reform, we want to prune back all the layers of regulation that are paralysing us. Modernising legislation will help fix this by cutting processing times and reducing costs for businesses.

    We’re also looking at our visitor network and trying different things. We want to realign our network to make sure it’s affordable and we can better meet the changing demand for experiences.

    We need to build in resilience so we’re not just building back assets which will get washed away in the next flood.

    We’re thinking of different categories like ‘buckets’, being really clear about what’s special to New Zealanders and keeping visitor risk and safety top of mind.

    The first bucket would be the things that DOC will absolutely continue to own and maintain, things like Great Walks, highly visited tracks, huts, and campsites.

    There might be some experiences that DOC wants to move away from.

    Like a hut at a road end where people regularly load up with lots of alcohol and then trash it. Or parts of tracks that are continually being washed out.

    And then we need to work out the things DOC would still own, but others might manage.

    Like halls, pools and some camp sites.

    We are also looking at how we partner with others to provide experiences – we’ve just done this on the new Hump Ridge track Great Walk – with the Charitable Trust operating it under a licensing agreement.

    The Backcountry Trust is doing an amazing job of maintaining our low use, backcountry huts – and we’re partnering with them through the Community Hut Programme and funding from the visitor levy.

    I want to be clear that no decisions have been made by Ministers yet – there is still a way to go. It will also be phased in over time.

    We’re preparing advice on this now and hope to get that to Ministers by the middle of this year.

    Ministers will need to make some tough calls on doing things differently – Minister Potaka has said publicly he wants us to sharpen our focus so we’re putting our resources into the things that matter most.

    That means concentrating on high value conservation areas and species, and key visitor destinations – and working out where we should divest, co-fund or partner with others on.

    Tongariro Alpine Crossing – case study

    We’re already testing ideas on managing visitors at our busiest spots – like the Tongariro Alpine Crossing.

    We’ve had a lot of problems in the past with high visitor numbers, people not properly prepared, and visitors not respecting the track or the mountain – in fact some would go to the toilet on the track.

    We’ve been working in partnership with Ngāti Hikairo and local tourism operators and come up with some innovative solutions.

    We’ve introduced the first booking system for a day walk in NZ.

    We’ve got Manaaki Rangers on site during peak times to explain the cultural heritage and why it’s important to respect the mountain.

    We have done a lot of research to understand the impacts of visitors, including what the carrying capacity is and what the environmental impacts are.

    We’ve also added a climate station to help support concessionaries with better weather forecasts.

    And we’re running behaviour change campaigns.

    We’re getting results – 80 – 90% of visitors are complying with the booking system, which has given us the ability to directly contact walkers before they head out and give them the safety and cultural messages.

    As a result visitors are now a lot more aware and respectful of the environment they’re heading into.

    Working with Ngāti Hikairo has also helped us connect with concessionaires, so they understand the cultural importance of the landscape – hosting hui with operators has helped work through issues and opportunities.

    This work is not easy, but this case study shows it can be done. We need to work out how to scale up this model and apply it elsewhere.

    Again – it’s not perfect, but we’re making progress and we will test and adapt.

    Cathedral Cove – case study

    Another example of where we’re working with manawhenua and local businesses to manage visitors is at Mautohe / Cathedral Cove in Coromandel.

    The walking track was closed for an extended period because of damage from Cyclone Gabrielle, and we had concerns about visitor safety – falling rocks, track washed away.

    Funding from the International Visitor Conservation and Tourism Levy meant we could reinstate walking access by re-routing the track temporarily.

    We’re pleased to see visitors enjoying the cove again – with hundreds of people a day back over summer.

    We’re doing intensive monitoring of numbers – we’ve looked at how to manage visitors through car parking and shuttles.

    And we had our staff and ambassadors on site over summer to ensure people have a great time and the place is well looked after.

    Ongoing geological risk is one of the main challenges we have at this site. The response plan gives us a good process and guidelines to manage visitor safety and minimising risk for visitors.

    The plan involves monitoring the weather – in particular heavy rain, and seismic information – if there are concerns we trigger inspections of the track and decide whether we need to take action to minimise the risk to visitors.

    Mobilising for Nature 

    We also want people to fall in love with nature and mobilise them into action.

    We want to create a nationwide movement where action for nature is something we all do, because we are proud of our unique species and landscapes.  

    But so many New Zealanders don’t see the scale of the challenge or fully appreciate the consequences of losing what we have. 

    And if they do want to get involved, they don’t know how.

    We’re focusing on raising awareness at scale and attracting more funding from other parties to sustain our important conservation delivery work. 

    DOC and New Zealand Nature Fund are piloting a Nature Prospectus – so the public can donate directly to, or corporates can fund, three priority projects.

    We’ve also signed up to the International Island Ocean Connection Challenge – to rewild three of our biggest islands – Auckland Island, Chatham Islands and Rakiura – to bring more revenue from international philanthropists.

    Tourism needs nature – making Rakiura predator free will be a big part of this and I encourage you to get behind it – you only need to see how Ulva Island draws the tourists.

    We’re aiming to connect people with nature – including encouraging people to get out into nature.

    We will also be developing a range of actions that are easily available for people and businesses to take, including donating or investing.

    Close

    So you can see DOC has many roles and challenges.

    We are working at pace on them.

    I appreciate those of you who’ve provided feedback on our proposals to modernise our legislation and explore access charging.

    I’m looking forward to hearing your feedback and having a discussion with you.

    Kia ora

    Related links

    1. Assessing the value of public conservation land: Managing conservation
    2. Report from Great South, outlines the serious economic and social impact on Te Anau and Fiordland from the twin disasters of unprecedented floods in February and border closures due to COVID-19. Fiordland counts the cost post floods and COVID-19

    Contact

    For media enquiries contact:

    Email: media@doc.govt.nz

    MIL OSI New Zealand News

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Process to consider establishing a sika deer Herd of Special Interest begins

    Source: New Zealand Government

    Almost 12 years after the passing of Herds of Special Interest (HOSI) legislation, the formal process that will look into designating New Zealand’s first HOSI has begun, Hunting and Fishing Minister James Meager has announced. 

    “Hunters are one of the biggest conservation tools we have in New Zealand, and we are committed to community-led management of valued introduced species like deer and tahr in some key places,” says Mr Meager.

    “I have recently received a HOSI proposal for the Central North Island sika herd in the Kaimanawa and Kaweka Forest Parks from the Central North Island Sika Foundation, and under the Game Animal Council Act 2013 have decided to begin the process to consider formally designating our country’s first Herd of Special Interest.    

    “A HOSI provides an opportunity for communities and government to proactively manage highly valued New Zealand game animal herds on conservation land. Not only will a HOSI reduce the environmental impacts of large deer populations, they will improve the condition of herds so hunters have better, larger-bodied, more sustainable populations to hunt.  

    “The Central North Island Sika Foundation have presented a  proposal which is a great starting point, and reflects the ongoing passion they have for improving the management and health of the central North Island sika herd and the environment they live in. 

    “The proposed sika HOSI would cover over 125,000 hectares of Kaimanawa and Kaweka Forest Parks, and complement efforts by others in the area, like local landowners, to better manage the deer population.” 

    The goals of the proposed HOSI are to enhance hunter participation in sika deer management, improve hunter satisfaction with sika venison quality and hunting experience, and reduce animal numbers to achieve sustainable forest regeneration. Herds would be managed in a way that improves hunting opportunities and outcomes, while maintaining or improving conservation values. 

    More information about the sika HOSI proposal is available on the Department of Conservation website here: Herds of Special Interest.

    The next phase will involve targeted consultation with stakeholders – including the Ministry for Primary Industries, the Game Animal Council, Department of Conversation, the Conservation Authority, relevant regional councils, conservation boards and iwi.

    Public consultation on a draft sika herd management plan will begin after targeted consultation is complete.

    MIL OSI New Zealand News

  • MIL-OSI USA: As Summer Travel Approaches, Davids Acts to Lower Gas Prices in Kansas

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Congresswoman Sharice Davids (KS-3)

    Today, Representative Sharice Davids urged the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to take action to lower gas prices, requesting an emergency waiver to allow the sale of E15 – fuel blended with 10.5 to 15 percent ethanol – during the 2025 summer season in Kansas.

    Ethanol, made from locally grown crops, is a more affordable alternative to unblended gasoline. This waiver, which has been granted multiple times in recent years, would help lower gas prices for Kansans, support local farmers, and strengthen domestic supply chains.

      

    “Kansas farmers and producers work hard to supply homegrown energy that lowers costs for families at the gas pump,” said Davids. “By allowing the sale of E15 this summer, the EPA can ensure Kansans benefit from lower gas prices while strengthening our economy and reducing reliance on foreign oil.”

    For multiple years, Davids has urged the EPA to guarantee the sale of E15 not only during the summer but also year-round. This would reduce our reliance on foreign oil, build U.S. energy security, and support Kansas agriculture and manufacturing. Davids previously visited East Kansas Agri-Energy (EKAE), a Garnett-based renewable ethanol producer, as part of her Farm Bill listening tour. EKAE has around 40 full-time employees and relies heavily on Kansas corn producers to supply the crops needed to make the biofuel.

    “We sincerely thank Representative Sharice Davids for her leadership in urging the EPA to once again allow the sale of E15 this summer,” said Geoff Cooper, President and CEO, Renewable Fuels Association. “Ensuring continued access to E15 nationwide is critical for lowering fuel costs, supporting farmers, and providing consumers with a cleaner, more affordable fuel choice. Most importantly, we thank Rep. Davids for her continued support for a permanent solution to secure year-round E15 nationwide.”

      

    Previously, Davids has taken multiple actions to lower gas prices for Kansans by:

    • Voting for the Year-Round Fuel Choice Act, which allow retailers the ability to sell higher ethanol-blended fuels year-round,
    • Leading the Nationwide Consumer and Fuel Retailer Choice Act, a bipartisan, bicameral bill that expands access to lower-cost, homegrown fuel,
    • Helping to pass legislation that promotes sustainable aviation fuel, a liquid fuel that achieves significant emissions reduction compared to fossil-based jet fuel,
    • Supporting legislation that expands biofuels infrastructure, opening up new market opportunities for sustainable fuel sources and lowering energy costs for Kansas families,
    • Pushing the President to suspend the federal gas tax, providing immediate relief to Kansans at the gas pump.

    A full copy of Davids’ letter to EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin can be found here.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Cantwell: “Bad Idea” for Department of Energy to Sell Off BPA Assets

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Washington Maria Cantwell

    04.03.25

    Cantwell: “Bad Idea” for Department of Energy to Sell Off BPA Assets

    House Republicans are considering proposals to sell off public lands to fund Trump tax cuts for corporations and the ultra-wealthy

    WASHINGTON, D.C. – Yesterday, U.S. Senator Maria Cantwell (D-WA), senior member of the Senate Finance Committee and ranking member of the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, pressed James Danly and Katharine MacGregor – President Trump’s nominees to serve as Deputy Secretary of the Department of Energy (DOE) and Deputy Secretary of the Department of the Interior (DOI) – on their commitments to not sell off public assets owned by Bonneville Power Administration after DOGE recently ordered the sale of the BPA Portland building. Sen. Cantwell also secured a commitment from Danly to uphold the Hanford Tri-Party Agreement, and she pressed MacGregor to oppose DOGE proposals to cut funding and staff to fight wildfires. 

    “Do you commit to opposing any proposal to auction off assets, including those owned by Bonneville Power Administration?” asked Sen. Cantwell.

    Danly responded, “I know there have been talks at different times for the Power Marketing Administrations to be privatized, and like, I have no interest in in that subject historically in my career, and I don’t really know enough about that to give an informed answer here.”

    “Maybe take a little homework assignment. Bad idea,” responded Sen. Cantwell.

    During the Q&A, Sen. Cantwell also secured a commitment from Danly to uphold the Tri-Party Agreement: “The budgets are not the purview of the position to which I’ve been nominated, but I will say this, the cleanup of the of the legacy waste sites is one of the handful of the truly core missions of the department, and I have every intention of abiding by the agreement,” said Danly.

    Sen. Cantwell then questioned MacGregor on funding for wildfire preparedness, DOGE cuts, and reporting from earlier in the day that Republicans are now considering proposals to sell off public lands to help pay for Trump’s tax cuts for corporations and the ultra-wealthy.

    “The department has the responsibility to fight [fires],” said Sen. Cantwell. “How do you make sure that we have the workforce that we need as part of our incident command teams [and fight fires]? And if confirmed, will you not support a plan that includes selling off public lands that would reduce our access?”

    Cantwell continued: “The two of you are the first witnesses to come before us since all the DOGE cuts. So, I’m asking you specifically — will you stop any cuts that will affect wildland firefighting efforts?”

    “I will absolutely evaluate any proposed cuts, should they be, you know, proposed for wildland firefighting cuts, and review those very closely,” MacGregor responded. “I can’t imagine a situation where that would occur, but if it did, I would want to make sure that we’re balancing and keeping the resources we need to fight fire.”

    The Department of Interior serves a critical role in fighting wildfires fires. However, DOGE cuts have threatened wildfire preparedness by firing 3,400 USDA Forest Service employees and about 1,000 National Park Service (NPS) employees. Many Interior employees have “Red Cards” which certify them to fight wildland fires. In addition, over 140 Department of Interior employees are part of Incident Management Teams which lead wildfire fighting efforts.

    In response, Sen. Cantwell led a letter to USDA Secretary Brooke Rollins and U.S. Forest Service Chief Tom Schultz demanding details about the Washington state personnel who were fired, including how many held Red Cards, and asked for the immediate reinstatement of all fired USDA and USFS personnel. While some employees have been reinstated, many experienced employees, including fire fighters, have retired and it has been reported that federal agencies, including the Department of Interior, will be implementing an additional reduction in force.

    “I think most of us would just be able to agree today, no one here wants those cuts. We think we need more resources,” said Sen. Cantwell. “The Palisades fire is more than a wakeup call, more than a wakeup call. So, we need more resources, not less.”

    Sen. Cantwell has long championed Hanford clean-up and played a leading role in overseeing the DOE’s cleanup efforts, fighting numerous Administration proposals to cut Hanford budgets. 

    Throughout the first Trump administration, Sen. Cantwell repeatedly led the charge in opposing drastic cuts to the Hanford budget, and in 2020 she led a successful effort to defeat a provision in the annual National Defense Authorization Act that could have diverted billions in funding from ongoing clean-up projects.

    In January, Sen. Cantwell voted against Chris Wright for DOE Secretary, citing his waffling commitment to uphold the Tri-Party Agreement – a newly negotiated agreement between the State of Washington, DOE, and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) that directs cleanup of the Hanford nuclear site in the Tri-Cities.

    Video of Sen. Cantwell’s remarks today are available HERE, audio HERE, and a full transcript is HERE.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Rep. LaMalfa Co-Leads Legislation to Repeal California’s Extreme Vehicle Emissions Mandates

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Doug LaMalfa 1st District of California

    Washington, D.C.— Yesterday, the House Energy and Commerce Committee along with key California Western Caucus members introduced three Congressional Review Act (CRA) resolutions to overturn the Biden administration’s approval of California’s vehicle emissions mandates, including the Advanced Clean Cars II regulation, the Advance Clean Trucks regulation, and the Omnibus Low-NOx Emissions rule. These rules, previously approved by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), allow California to impose aggressive regulations on cars and trucks that drive up costs and restrict consumer choice in California and nationwide.

    The three CRAs, co-lead by Congressman Doug LaMalfa (R-Richvale), were introduced by Representatives John Joyce (R-PA), John James (R-MI), and Jay Obernolte (R-CA) and would repeal these unrealistic mandates, preventing California from being able to force these costly policies on its residents and onto the rest of the country.

    “California’s sweeping and unachievable emissions mandates are a direct assault on everyone who lives, works, or does business in our state,” said Rep. LaMalfa. “These regulations drive up costs, limit consumer choice, and force trucking and automotive industries into an impossible transition timeline. Californians are already paying some of the highest fuel and energy costs in the country. These rules are causing the cost of new and used cars and trucks to increase for everyone. If you want to buy an electric vehicle, buy one, but everybody else shouldn’t be forced into this mandate. The Federal Government cannot allow one state to destroy the American car and truck market. Instead of making life even more expensive, we should focus on what consumers want. I’m pleased to support this effort to stop California’s insanity and protect drivers and consumers across my state and the country.”

    “The American people should choose what vehicle is right for them, not California bureaucrats. By submitting the three California waivers to Congress, Administrator Zeldin is ensuring that Congress has oversight of these major rules that impact every American,” said House Energy and Commerce Chairman Guthrie. “The Committee has been committed to addressing this issue since California first attempted to create a de facto EV mandate. Energy and Commerce Republicans will continue to fight against far-left policies that would harm consumers and will now work to ensure that the Congressional Review Act process finally puts these issues to rest.”

    Background

    Under the Clean Air Act, states are generally prohibited from setting their own tailpipe emission standards for cars and trucks. However, California has a unique exemption under Section 209, which allows the state to establish its own emissions regulations if it submits a waiver to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and receives approval. Once granted, these California standards can also be adopted by other states under Section 177 of the Clean Air Act. Currently, about a dozen states follow California’s emissions policies, effectively turning the state’s regulations into a nationwide mandate.

    The Biden administration approved several controversial waivers requested by the California Air Resources Board (CARB), allowing the state to impose extreme emissions rules that impact car and truck costs and availability across the country. These include:

    • Advanced Clean Cars II (ACC2) – Approved in December 2024, this regulation mandates that 35% of new car sales be zero-emission by 2026, increasing to 100% by 2035. At least 12 states have already adopted ACC2. Failure to meet this goal means a maximum penalty of $25,000 per non-compliant vehicle sold to consumers.
    • Advanced Clean Trucks (ACT) – Approved in March 2023, this regulation forces truck manufacturers and retailers to meet strict zero-emission quotas by 2035, including 55% of Class 2B-3 truck sales, 75% of Class 4-8 straight truck sales, and 40% of truck tractor sales. At least 11 states have adopted ACT.
    • Omnibus Low-NOx Emissions Rule – Approved in December 2024, this regulation imposes aggressive emissions reductions on medium- and heavy-duty truck and other engines, requiring NOx emissions to be cut by 75% below current standards for Model Year 2024-2026 compared to 2010 levels and particulate matter emissions to be cut by 50%.

    Congressman Doug LaMalfa is Chairman of the Congressional Western Caucus and a lifelong farmer representing California’s First Congressional District, including Butte, Colusa, Glenn, Lassen, Modoc, Shasta, Siskiyou, Sutter, Tehama and Yuba Counties.

    ###

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Gosar Reintroduces the Public Lands Renewable Energy Act

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Paul A Gosar DDS (AZ-04)

    Washington, D.C. — Congressman Paul A. Gosar, D.D.S. (AZ-09), issued the following statement after reintroducing H.R. 1994, the Public Land Renewable Energy Development Act of 2025 (PLREDA),legislation which increases the production of wind and solar energy on public lands:

    “The previous administration’s unprecedented four-year war on American energy made it nearly impossible to produce domestic energy on public lands and was nothing short of catastrophic.  

    While timely permitting of energy projects on federal lands was a serious problem, looking ahead, renewable energy sources like wind and solar should be an integral part of the United States’ all-of-the-above energy strategy.  Our nation’s public lands can play a critical role in lowering energy prices and can help meet our nation’s growing energy demand.

    To help drive investment towards the highest quality renewable sources, my legislation streamlines land use and promotes more renewable energy on federal lands.  It also ensures revenue from their development is shared with the states and counties while also supporting conservation programs where these projects are located.  

    This funding will allow rural and western communities to benefit from renewable energy development on federal lands to support essential services,” said Representative Paul Gosar.

    “The demand for electricity in the U.S. is growing rapidly, driven by economic expansion, manufacturing, and new technologies. To meet this demand, we must unlock America’s full energy potential, including responsible development of renewable energy on federal lands,” added Frank Macchiarola, Chief Advocacy Officer at American Clean Power (ACP). “The Public Lands Renewable Energy Development Act is key to harnessing these resources to enhance energy security, improve grid reliability, and boost local economies. ACP appreciates Representative Gosar’s leadership in reintroducing this bill and looks forward to working with Congress to accelerate renewable energy development.”

    “With increasing demand for renewable energy development on public lands, it is critical that thoughtful policies are implemented that ensure continued conservation and public access. As hunters and anglers, we support the Public Land Renewable Energy Development Act which would distribute a portion of revenue collected from renewable energy projects on public lands into a new conservation fund for the benefit of fish and wildlife habitat as well as improved recreational access to public lands. Passing this legislation into law would ensure a revenue source to support the interests of hunters and anglers alongside the expansion of renewable energy.” said Kaden McArthur, Director of Policy and Government Relations, Backcountry Hunters & Anglers.

    “CRES is proud to support Congressman Gosar’s Public Lands Renewable Energy Development Act, which streamlines the responsible development of renewable energy on public lands,” said Heather Reams, President of the Citizens for Responsible Energy Solutions (CRES). “As America moves toward energy dominance, we must embrace an all-of-the-above approach to energy. This bill expands our energy supply, benefits local communities and promotes environmental stewardship while ensuring continued economic growth.”

    Cosponsors:

    Representatives Amodei, LaMalfa

    Outside group support:

    American Clean Power Association

    Backcountry Hunters & Anglers

    Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership

    Citizens for Responsible Energy Solutions (CRES)

    Trout Unlimited

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Security: New York Business Owner Sentenced for Illegally Transporting and Selling Probable Carcinogen

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

    Baltimore, Maryland Today, U.S. District Judge Richard D. Bennett sentenced Idrissa Bagayoko, 59, of New York, New York, to one year of supervised release with three months of home confinement and restitution in the amount of $5,640, for illegally transporting and selling an unregistered toxic pesticide, SNIPER DDVP.

    Kelly O. Hayes, U.S. Attorney for the District of Maryland, announced the sentence with Special Agent in Charge Allison Landsman, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA); Special Agent in Charge Greg Thompson, Department of Transportation Office of Inspector General (DOT-OIG), Mid-Atlantic Region; and Chief Carolyn Rogers, Elkton Police Department (EPD).

    In November 2024, after a four-day trial, a federal jury found Bagayoko guilty of recklessly transporting a dangerous probable carcinogen, the unregistered pesticide known as SNIPER DDVP, without proper documentation and knowingly selling SNIPER DDVP in Maryland.  Bagayoko was convicted under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) and the Hazardous Material Transportation Act.

    According to evidence presented at trial, on September 29, 2021, Bagayoko drove from New York to Maryland and sold two boxes of the unregistered pesticide SNIPER DDVP to an individual.  He was later stopped by police in Elkton, Maryland, with 18 additional boxes of SNIPER DDVP.  Bagayoko, who owns and operates Maliba Trading LLC, procured a total of 1,920 bottles of SNIPER DDVP and drove from New York to Maryland to sell the illegal pesticide.

    Laboratory testing revealed Bagayoko was transporting SNIPER DDVP containing the chemical dichlorvos, which has been classified by the federal government as a probable human carcinogen.  The defendant transported more than 330 pounds of dichlorvos, without requisite shipping papers, which are required to alert first responders that they are dealing with a toxic chemical compound and probable carcinogen, in the event of an accident.  He subsequently sold two boxes of this unregistered pesticide to a distributor in Takoma Park, Maryland.

    “Illegally transporting and selling an illegal pesticide that is a known probable carcinogen puts public health at serious risk,” Hayes said.  “The District of Maryland is committed to rooting out criminal actors that brazenly violate federal transportation and environmental laws while simultaneously putting Maryland’s first responders and residents in harm’s way.”

    “The defendant illegally distributed, sold and transported a toxic pesticide across state lines and lied to local police, claiming he was only transporting tea,” Landsman said.  “Today’s sentencing reflects the dangerous nature of illegal pesticides being transported and sold in the United States and the serious consequences that flagrant offenders face for this egregious conduct.”

    “Recklessly transporting hazardous materials without proper documentation as required by federal regulations is illegal and poses a danger to the traveling public,” Thompson said. “Together with our federal, state, and local partners, we will continue to pursue individuals and companies that circumvent laws designed to safely move goods and products throughout the United States.”

    U.S. Attorney Hayes commended the EPA, DOT-OIG, and EPD for their help with the investigation.  Ms. Hayes also thanked Assistant U.S. Attorney Kimberly Phillips and Special Assistant U.S. Attorneys Kertisha Dixon and David Lastra who prosecuted the case.

    For more information about the Maryland U.S. Attorney’s Office, its priorities, and resources available to help the community, please visit https://www.justice.gov/usao-md.

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI USA: Grassley, Thune, Colleagues Urge Trump to Authorize Nationwide, Year-Round Sale of E15

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Iowa Chuck Grassley
    WASHINGTON – Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) joined Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) and a bipartisan group of Senate colleagues in urging President Trump to permit the nationwide sale of E15 fuel through the 2025 summer driving season and beyond. The move would enhance America’s energy security and lower fuel costs for consumers while leveraging American agriculture.
    “To meet our nation’s energy needs and decrease the cost of fuel, we must deploy an all-of-the-above energy strategy, which includes leveraging domestic biofuels,” the senators wrote. “As affirmed by the actions you took to first allow year-round E15 in 2019, and those approved for the summers afterward, the sale of higher blends of biofuels like E15 through the summer months supports the domestic fuel supply, reduces consumer costs, and promotes American biofuels and agriculture feedstocks.
    “Utilizing American ethanol year-round is a direct solution to reinforcing our energy supply and reducing consumer costs, and the issuance of a nationwide waiver for the 2025 summer driving season is a clear path toward these shared goals,” the senators continued.
    The senators’ bipartisan letter requests that President Trump use the nationwide temporary waivers provided under the Clean Air Act to extend the Reid Vapor Pressure (RVP) waiver through the 2025 summer driving season.
    Additional cosigners include Sens. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), Tammy Baldwin (D-Wis.), Kevin Cramer (R-N.D.), Tammy Duckworth (D-Ill.), Joni Ernst (R-Iowa), Deb Fischer (R-Neb.), Josh Hawley (R-Mo.), John Hoeven (R-N.D.), Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), Jerry Moran (R-Kan.), Gary Peters (D-Mich.), Pete Ricketts (R-Neb.), Mike Rounds (R-S.D.), Elissa Slotkin (D-Mich.) and Tina Smith (D-Minn.).
    Background:
    On the first day of his second term, President Trump directed the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to explore the benefits of making E15 available year-round through his Executive Order Declaring a National Energy Emergency.
    Grassley has long-championed year-round E15:
    April 2024: Welcoming the EPA’s announcement permitting summertime E15 sales in eight Midwestern states
    December 2023: Pushing the Biden administration to quickly finalize a summertime waiver, helping retailers prepare for summer 2024 sales
    May 2021: Introducing legislation to restore integrity to the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS)
    May 2019: Leading the effort to encourage the first Trump administration to approve year-round E15
    October 2018: Authoring an op-ed with Sen. Ernst in support of year-round E15
    October 2010: Welcoming the EPA’s decision first authorizing E15 usage
    Full text of the letter to President Trump is available HERE.
    -30-

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Explore the seafloor: new maps launched in Akaroa

    Source: Environment Canterbury Regional Council

    The maps are the result of extensive fieldwork and modelling, and will help rūnanga, communities and agencies make more informed decisions about ecosystem management.

    Iongairo is a partnership between papatipu rūnanga of Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū, the Department of Conservation, and us, with the University of Otago serving as the project’s science partner. ‘Iongairo’ represents the relationship between Papatūānuku and Tangaroa in Te Ao Māori — signifying the special relationship between the whenua/land and the moana/ocean.

    View the

    seafloor maps

    Insights into marine ecosystems

    Ōnuku Rūnanga Chairperson, Rik Tainui, said it was the opportunity of a lifetime for Ōnuku.

    “We hadn’t done any extensive work with any agency in the harbour before and I just thought, this is brilliant. We’re going to use the data that’s been collected to help us determine where we should plant, and do things that can slow down sedimentation which isn’t helping our moana. We won’t have to guess like we’ve done in the past.”

    Wairewa Rūnanga mana whenua mana moana team leader, Robin Wybrow, said the most important part of the project was the collaboration and relationships.

    “A really important part of the mahi was the foundation work, with all the partners coming together to determine how the research project would take place, our shared values, and the direction it needed to take. The group just clicked, which was a pleasant surprise.”

    Environment Canterbury chief scientist, Dr Fiona Shanhun, said that this resource represents a significant collaborative effort to help enhance the way we look after coastal marine ecosystems, now and for future generations.

    “The Iongairo project has provided incredible insights into the marine ecosystems around Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū, enriching our knowledge of diverse seafloor habitats and offering more information than ever before to enable kaitiaki and coastal managers to explore connections between the land and the sea.”

    “Data collected will also help researchers detect and assess possible impacts from climate change and human activities on key habitats and taonga species.”

    Department of Conservation Marine Ranger, Tom MacTavish agrees that information is paramount for conservation.

    “Better marine conservation relies on improving our understanding of what we have here in the moana, where these habitats are and how these ecosystems are affected by what’s happening on the land.”

    University of Otago research fellow, Dr Matthew Desmond, echoed that the Iongairo project was a great opportunity to develop more accurate models and datasets for the area.

    “By understanding on a finer scale what’s happening in each reef system, we can better manage them and understand their health. What we achieved by having all these partners on board was greater than what we could have achieved on our own.”

    About the kaupapa/project:

    Learn more about the Iongairo project:

    MIL OSI New Zealand News

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: End-of-season stubble burning reminders

    Source: Environment Canterbury Regional Council

    Environment Canterbury © 2025
    Retrieved: 9:20am, Fri 04 Apr 2025
    ecan.govt.nz/get-involved/news-and-events/2025/new-news-events-and-stories-page-3/

    MIL OSI New Zealand News

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Treated wood? If in doubt, leave it out of the burn pile

    Source: Environment Canterbury Regional Council

    Recently, we’ve been spotting chemically treated pallets and other treated timber in burn piles on properties across Waitaha/Canterbury.

    Burning chemically treated timber, painted wood, MDF, plywood and chipboard creates toxic smoke and ash that’s harmful to health and the environment. To protect your health, your community’s health and the environment, never burn these types of wood.

    Chemically treated pallets are sometimes sold as kindling for home heating, but in addition to creating harmful smoke and ash, the chemicals in treated wood will corrode your wood burner.

    How to identify chemically treated wood

    Wood stamped with ‘MB’ (methyl bromide) or ‘CCA’ (chromated copper arsenate) has been treated with toxic chemicals and must not be burned. Timber with a greenish tinge is also likely to be chemically treated and should not be burned. If in doubt about whether or not timber is chemically treated, do not burn it anywhere. The only safe and legal way to dispose of treated timber in Waitaha is dropping it to a transfer station.

    Find out more about transfer stations in your area from your local council.

    Heat-treated pallets stamped with the letters ‘HT’ are safe to burn, but remember to check for and remove any plastic feet or attachments before burning.

    Burning rules in Waitaha

    If you live on a property less than two hectares in area, you can not burn anything outdoors, even if you live in a rural area. If you live on a property over two hectares in area, you can burn dry vegetation, untreated wood, paper and cardboard as long as you follow the rules, burn responsibly, and ensure smoke does not cause a nuisance beyond your property boundary.

    Always visit the Checkitsalright.nz website from Fire and Emergency New Zealand to find out whether you’re in an open, restricted, or prohibited fire season and whether you need a permit for your burn.

    If you live in a Clean Air Zone, outdoor burning is only allowed from 1 September to 30 April (for the Kaiapoi, Christchurch, and Timaru Clean Air Zones) or from 1 September to 31 May (for the Rangiora, Geraldine, Ashburton and Waimate Clean Air Zones). Check all the rules on our outdoor burning page.

    More information

    MIL OSI New Zealand News

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Community groups receive funding to protect indigenous biodiversity

    Source: Environment Canterbury Regional Council

    Environment Canterbury © 2025
    Retrieved: 9:20am, Fri 04 Apr 2025
    ecan.govt.nz/get-involved/news-and-events/2025/community-groups-receive-funding-to-protect-indigenous-biodiversity/

    MIL OSI New Zealand News

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Enviroschool students learn through play in Timaru

    Source: Environment Canterbury Regional Council

    Environment Canterbury © 2025
    Retrieved: 9:20am, Fri 04 Apr 2025
    ecan.govt.nz/get-involved/news-and-events/2025/enviroschool-students-learn-through-play-in-timaru/

    MIL OSI New Zealand News

  • MIL-OSI Canada: Statement from Ministers on the start of the Celebration of Swans

    Source: Government of Canada regional news

    Statement from Ministers on the start of the Celebration of Swans
    jlutz
    April 1, 2025 – 9:41 am

    Minister of Environment Nils Clarke and Minister of Tourism and Culture John Streicker have issued the following statement:

    “We are proud to announce the beginning of the Celebration of Swans festival, one of the Yukon’s most cherished spring traditions. Each April, the skies above M’Clintock Bay at Marsh Lake come alive as tens of thousands of swans, ducks and geese pause to rest on their long journey north.

    “At the heart of this festival is the Swan Haven Interpretive Centre, which has served as a beacon of education and appreciation for these magnificent birds since its opening in 1994. Located on the Traditional Territories of the Kwanlin Dün First Nation and the Carcross/Tagish First Nation, Swan Haven provides an incredible opportunity for visitors to witness the beauty of these migrations firsthand and learn about the critical role that early spring open waters play in sustaining migratory waterfowl.

    “Each year, more than 4,000 visitors make their way to Swan Haven to experience this magnificent spectacle. Swan Haven is open daily throughout April and offers a wealth of learning opportunities for people of all ages. Through interactive exhibits, knowledgeable guides and daily swan counts, visitors can deepen their understanding of the birds and their habitat.

    “This year, we are excited to announce the launch of a new addition, the Swan Haven audio tour: A walk with the swans. This 25-minute self-guided tour, available on your phone or tablet, leads you from the Swan Haven stairs to a beautiful viewpoint 500 metres along the shoreline of M’Clintock Bay.

    “We are also pleased to share that, as in previous years, the Government of Yukon will produce a collectible poster for the festival, featuring spring-themed artwork by a local artist. This year’s poster showcases a stunning image by photographer Takeshi Hanatani of a swan near the edge of the ice. These posters are available at the Department of Environment office at 10 Burns Road in Whitehorse and at the Swan Haven Interpretive Centre.

    “Beyond its role as an educational hub, Swan Haven stands as a testament to the Yukon’s commitment to conservation and stewardship. As we celebrate another year of the festival, we encourage everyone to take a moment to appreciate the significance of the migration season and recognize the ongoing efforts to preserve these habitats.

    “Let us also remember the responsibility we share in safeguarding our environment for all who call it home – whether they walk upon the land, swim in the waters or take to the skies.”

    Media contact

    Laura Seeley
    Cabinet Communications
    867-332-7627
    laura.seeley@yukon.ca

    News release #:

    25-144

    Related information:

    A Celebration of Swans 2025

    MIL OSI Canada News

  • MIL-OSI United Nations: New Permanent Representative of Ukraine Presents Credentials to the Director-General of the United Nations Office at Geneva

    Source: United Nations – Geneva

    Yevhenii Tsymbaliuk, the new Permanent Representative of Ukraine to the United Nations Office at Geneva, today presented his credentials to Tatiana Valovaya, the Director-General of the United Nations Office at Geneva.

    Prior to his appointment to Geneva, Mr. Tsymbaliuk served as Special Envoy of Ukraine to the International Atomic Energy Agency since August 2024, and as Ambassador-at-Large on Human Rights, Gender Equality and Diversity for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine since January 2024.

    Mr. Tsymbaliuk served as Permanent Representative of Ukraine to the International Organizations in Vienna from July 2019 to December 2023.  From April 2015 to June 2018, he served as Ambassador of Ukraine to Kenya, concurrently serving as non-resident Ambassador to the Union of the Comoros, and as Permanent Representative of Ukraine to the United Nations Environment Programme and to the United Nations Human Settlements Programme from October 2015 to June 2018.  He also served as non-resident Ambassador to Rwanda from December 2015 to June 2018, and Tanzania from June 2015 to June 2018.

    He has also held high-level domestic roles within the Ukrainian Government, including as Deputy Director-General of the Department for International Organizations of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (2019); First Deputy Head of the Directorate of Strategic Planning and Operational Support of the Administration of the President (2018-2019); and Deputy Director-General of the Secretariat of the Minister for Foreign Affairs (2012-2015).

    Mr. Tsymbaliuk obtained a master’s degree in history at the Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, where he also completed studies in English and German, and gained a second master’s degree in German language education at the Kyiv National Linguistic University.  Born on 30 May 1972 in Magdeburg, Germany, he is fluent in English and German, and is married and has one daughter.

    _______________

    Produced by the United Nations Information Service in Geneva for use of the media; 
    not an official record. English and French versions of our releases are different as they are the product of two separate coverage teams that work independently.

     

    CR25.014E

    MIL OSI United Nations News

  • MIL-OSI Canada: Government of Yukon announces key changes for the 2025–26 hunting and fishing licensing year

    Source: Government of Canada regional news

    Government of Yukon announces key changes for the 2025–26 hunting and fishing licensing year
    zaburke
    March 31, 2025 – 2:35 pm

    The Government of Yukon is launching the 2025–26 hunting and fishing licensing year with important changes aimed at improving wildlife management, supporting conservation efforts and providing new opportunities for hunters across the territory.

    New hunting opportunities for the 2025–26 licensing year:

    • The number of deer permits will increase from 12 to 20. This includes two additional youth permits (for hunters aged 14 to 15), bringing the total to four permits for GMZ 1-15, 1-17 to 1-19, 1-21 to 1-72, 2, 3, 4 (except 4-03 and 4-51), 5, 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11.
      • Adult permits will increase from 10 to 16, with the total number of regular permits split between two areas: 10 permits for Game Management Zones (GMZ) 5, 7, 8 and 9, and six permits for GMZ 1-15, 1-17, 1-19, 1-21 to 1-72, 2, 3, 4 (except 4-03 and 4-51), 10 and 11.
    • The government is increasing the number of moose permit hunt authorizations (PHA) in the Fish Lake and Mount Lorne Moose Management Units (MMUs) in the Southern Lakes region from 7 to 15.
      • Fish Lake will have four new permits, excluding Game Management Subzones 718, 719 and 721, bringing the total to seven permits.
      • Mount Lorne will see four new permits, excluding Subzone 904, bringing the total to eight.
      • Permit numbers for the Wheaton River Moose Management Unit (MMU) remain unchanged at four PHAs. However, the allocated PHAs will now apply to Game Management Subzones 722, 728 and 729.
      • These additional moose permit opportunities are well within sustainable harvest guidelines. Ongoing population inventories will provide additional data to assess trends in the moose population and ensure sustainable hunting opportunities.

    New conservation measures for the 2025–26 licensing year:

    • The Braeburn elk hunt will be closed for the 2025–26 season to protect and support the recovery of the local elk population.
    • Starting in 2026, the bison hunting season will be shortened by one week, closing on March 24. This change, recommended by the Aishihik Bison Technical Team, is designed to reduce pressure on pregnant cows and protect the bison herd during critical reproductive periods.
    • In response to concerns raised by Champagne and Aishihik First Nations (CAFN), hunting grizzly bears will be prohibited within 100 metres of the centreline along the Haines Road corridor (from Gribbles Gulch to Unnamed Creek #1). This closure will apply to the east side of the road (Game Management Zone 7), where grizzly bear hunting was previously allowed, while the west side of the road (Game Management Zone 6) remains closed due to existing restrictions on grizzly bear hunting. This measure addresses ongoing concerns raised by CAFN Elders about Grizzly bear hunting in proximity to Klukshu, a traditional village
    • Due to ongoing conservation concerns, the Kluane Wildlife Sanctuary sheep permit will not be offered for the 2025–26 season.
    • To protect the lake trout population, new regulations are in place for Little Atlin Lake. Anglers may only harvest lake trout between 585 mm and 650 mm in length. A seasonal harvest closure (July 1 to November 30) will help protect the species during critical life cycle periods. Additionally, all anglers must use single-point barbless hooks to reduce harm to fish populations.

    Upcoming lotteries:

    • The Special Guide Licence (SGL) application period will run from April 1 to April 17.
    • The Permit Hunt Authorization lottery will be open from April 17 to May 15. 

    The 2025–26 season brings exciting opportunities for hunters and anglers, while ensuring responsible management of the Yukon’s natural resources. Hunters and anglers are expected to review updated regulations and secure necessary permits and licences before heading out on the land. Responsible recreating and compliance help ensure the sustainability of the territory’s wildlife populations for years to come.
     

    Our government is committed to the responsible and sustainable management of the Yukon’s wildlife resources, ensuring their health and abundance for future generations. These changes reflect our ongoing collaboration with communities, wildlife experts and stakeholders. By balancing conservation efforts with hunting and fishing opportunities, we are supporting both the vitality of our ecosystems and the needs and lifestyle of Yukoners.

    Minister of Environment Nils Clarke

    Quick facts

    • The Government of Yukon closely monitors wildlife populations and implements regulations to protect species at risk and maintain healthy ecosystems. This includes setting harvest limits, regulating hunting methods and closing areas to hunting or fishing when necessary.

    • All hunters and anglers in the Yukon must obtain the appropriate licences before engaging in hunting or fishing activities. Licences are available for purchase online, in person at Environment offices or through authorized vendors. 

    • Regulations may vary across different regions of the Yukon. Hunters and anglers must review the specific regulations for their intended areas before planning their activities.

    • Bag limits are set each year to control the number of animals harvested and ensure sustainable populations. These limits vary by species and region.

    • The Government of Yukon encourages all anglers to submit their burbot sport fishing catch reports for the 2025–26 season. Reports can be submitted online through eLicensing accounts. Accurate catch data helps manage wildlife and fisheries effectively and anglers are encouraged to contribute to conservation efforts. 

    Media contact

    Laura Seeley
    Cabinet Communications
    867-332-7627
    laura.seeley@yukon.ca 

    Mara De La Rosa
    Communications, Environment
    867-456-5565
    mara.delarosa@yukon.ca 
     

    News release #:

    25-142

    Related information:

    Guide to hunting in the Yukon
    See fishing rules and regulations
    Apply for a special guide licence to guide a non-Yukon resident Canadian on a h…
    Apply for a Permit Hunt Authorization
    Where to buy Yukon angling, hunting and camping permits, seals or licences
    What We Heard report released on proposed Little Atlin Lake fishing regulation …

    MIL OSI Canada News