From 1 June 2025, the sale of single use vapes will be officially banned across England under new national legislation designed to protect public health and the environment.
Birmingham City Council will continue to lead the way in enforcement through Operation CLOUD, its multi-agency crackdown on illicit tobacco, vape, and counterfeit goods.
The new legislation bans the supply of single-use vapes—also known as disposable vapes—across England. This includes both nicotine and non-nicotine products, whether sold in shops, at markets, or online. Retailers found in breach may face fines, product seizures, and legal action.
The Council’s Trading Standards team has already seized 14,243 illegal or non-compliant vapes across Birmingham from September 2024 to date. In support of the new law, the team carried out a Day of Action on Tuesday 3 June 2025 in partnership with West Midlands Police, targeting rogue traders and retailers who continue to stock banned or illicit vaping products.
The new legislation, announced by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra), is part of the government’s broader environmental and public health priorities. According to Defra, five million single use vapes are thrown away every week in the UK, contributing significantly to plastic and lithium battery waste, and often being marketed in a way that appeals to children.
Councillor Jamie Tennant, Cabinet Member for Social Justice, Community Safety and Equalities at Birmingham City Council, said:
“The ban on single-use vapes is a major step forward in protecting both our environment and our communities. These products are not only harmful to health and worryingly attractive to young people — they also create vast amounts of unnecessary plastic and battery waste. Birmingham’s Trading Standards team has already been doing fantastic work tackling the illegal vape trade through Operation CLOUD, and this new legislation gives us even greater power to act. We will continue to take robust enforcement action to safeguard our streets, our young people, and our planet.”
Operation CLOUD continues to target the supply chain of illicit goods in Birmingham, with enforcement focusing on high-risk premises and community intelligence. The Council is encouraging residents to report sales of single use vapes or other suspected illegal products by contacting Trading Standards via Citizens Advice on 0808 223 1133 or online at https://www.birmingham.gov.uk/tradingstandards.
“Beat the Heat,” an initiative tackling extreme heat and environmental hazards in workplaces and major events, is making strides in turning recommendations into concrete solutions. Running from January 2025 to June 2026 it is the first phase of collaboration between WHO and FIFA under the World Cup 2022 Legacy Fund. The project aims to protect workers, attendees, and local communities from extreme heat and other environmental hazards, such as solar UV exposure, and outdoor air pollution and to provide adequate drinking water and sanitation. By focusing on workplaces, mega sports events, and mass gatherings, it will increase awareness and action to strengthen preparedness and response measures to safeguard health in high-risk settings.
The WHO supports strengthening health and well-being through sports initiatives as support by the World Health Assembly resolution 77.12. Sport for Health Programme.
“The Sport for Health Programme is a platform for integrating health into the world of sport, helping to ensure that major events and everyday sporting activities alike promote and protect health of all involved persons,” said Dr Gaudenz Silberschmidt, Director, Health and Multilateral Partnerships. “In the face of rising global temperatures, the Beat the Heat project is both timely and critically important—it provides practical solutions to safeguard workers, staff and spectators from extreme heat, while reinforcing the importance of climate-resilient and healthy sport environments.”
With extreme heat now recognized as a critical public health issue, the initiative will mobilize global support with a focus on developing action plans to ensure workplaces and public spaces are equipped with heat response strategies.
Heatwaves alone are projected to cause 1.6 million deaths by 2050, underscoring the urgent need for robust, evidence-based measures to protect high-risk groups. WHO data show that 99% of the global population breathe air that exceeds WHO guideline limits and contains pollutants responsible for 4.2 million premature deaths annually. Occupational hazards kill at least 3 million people each year and cause economic losses of up to 6% of global GDP.
“The Beat the Heat initiative is about turning global guidance into real-world action,” said Dr Maria Neira, Director, Department of Environment, Climate Change and Health. “By supporting the rollout of protective guidance and tools, we’re helping to build safer, more resilient workplaces and safeguard the health of workers facing rising heat-related risks around the world.”
According to the ILO, globally, 2.4 billion workers—or 70% of the global workforce—are exposed to excessive heat, resulting in more than 22 million non-fatal injuries annually. In 2022, an estimated 1.6 billion people worked outdoors. People working in and attending outdoor sports and mass gathering events are also at high risk of exposure to extreme heat, air pollution, and solar UV.
“Protecting people during public health emergencies and mass gatherings must remain a top priority,” said Nedret Emiroglu, Director, Department of Health Emergency Core Capabilities, Emergency Preparedness and Response Programme, WHO. “Climate change is driving more frequent and intense heatwaves, worsening air quality and UV exposure, all of which heighten health risks. Through the Beat the Heat initiative, WHO supports countries and event organizers with tools, early warning systems, and protocols. From local festivals to international tournaments, preparedness and response measures are critical to reduce adverse health impacts and build resilience.”
Given the significant impact of extreme heat on sports and mass gatherings, WHO is engaging with select countries to implement targeted collaboration. Work has already begun with the United Republic of Tanzania and other countries will join shortly. With their experience in hosting major events and their strong commitment to occupational and environmental health, these countries are well positioned to pilot and scale effective interventions to reduce heat-related risks.
As the world continues to experience record-breaking temperatures, the initiative remains a cornerstone of WHO’s commitment to climate-related health response—ensuring long-term protection for those most at risk.
Conservation and Ecosystem Management students from Nambour TAFE join with Gympie-based QPWS rangers to tackle destructive and invasive weeds in the Amamoor State Forest.
A powerful new partnership between Nambour TAFE and Queensland Parks and Wildlife Service (QPWS) is giving the next generation of conservation professionals hands-on experience in protecting native ecosystems.
Twenty Conservation and Ecosystem Management students from Nambour TAFE joined forces with Gympie-based QPWS rangers in late May to tackle the destructive weeds that threaten native rainforests in the Amamoor State Forest.
The unique collaboration was coordinated by QPWS Sunshine Coast Ranger David Wolters, himself a graduate of the same TAFE course, and TAFE Queensland conservation and ecosystem educator Alissa George.
David and Elissa, who recognised the opportunity to blend practical learning with meaningful environmental outcomes, said partnerships like these played an important role in combatting invasive species and protecting fragile ecosystems.
“This was a great experience for Nambour TAFE Conservation and Ecosystem Management students,” Alissa said.
“The students benefited from real industry experiences and learning the techniques used by QPWS to eradicate environmental weeds including Cats Claw creeper, Dutchman’s Pipe, and Lantana.
“They eagerly listened to the rangers explain the importance of the site ecologically.
“We saw the effects of the biocontrol for Cat’s Claw Creeper – the leaf sucking tingid bug – which the students were excited to see.
“TAFE Nambour is very excited to continue this volunteering opportunity as it has been the highlight of the course for the students,” Alissa said.
Throughout the day, students honed skills in identifying and removing invasive species including Cat’s Claw Creeper (Dolichandra unguis-cati), Dutchman’s Pipe (Aristolochia elegans), and Lantana (Lantana camara).
The experience also gave them direct access to seasoned rangers, allowing for deep conversations around conservation careers and techniques used in the field.
For David Wolters, the day was a full-circle moment.
“I’ve always been driven by a desire to support and protect our natural environment,” David said.
“Studying Conservation and Ecosystem Management at TAFE provided me with the hands-on fieldwork and practical training that shaped my skills.
“Now working in national parks,
“I’m proud to contribute to the protection of our unique ecosystems and landscapes.
“I’ve reconnected with TAFE to help current students gain valuable experience in the field, something that made a big difference during my own studies.
“I’m passionate about sharing the knowledge I’ve gained working for Queensland Parks and Wildlife Service and look forward to continuing my work with Alissa George and her students in the years ahead.”
QPWS Gympie Ranger Jim Martin, who also attended, praised the impact of the students’ involvement.
“It’s great to have such a big group here keen to get stuck into the Cats Claw, which can feel like an insurmountable task at times,” Jim said.
“Staying on top of the initial treatments we’ve made with solid follow-up work is what will make a real difference here, so the potential benefits of having TAFE groups out here to lend a hand and learn is huge.”
The initiative not only delivered tangible benefits for the environment but also inspired and equipped the next generation of conservation professionals.
Student feedback was overwhelmingly positive, with many highlighting the field trip as a defining moment in their studies.
With the groundwork laid and the vines pulled, both TAFE and QPWS are looking forward to building on this successful partnership – one weed at a time.
Source: Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe – OSCE
Headline: OSCE Chairpersonship Conference on Climate and Security underscored the importance of a comprehensive approach
Panelists at the OSCE Chairpersonship Conference on Climate and Security in Espoo, 11 June. (Finland Ministry for Foreign Affairs/Markku Pajunen) Photo details
ESPOO, 12 June 2024 ― The OSCE Chairpersonship Conference on Climate and Security concluded yesterday in Espoo, Finland. The conference focused on the urgent need to act on the pressing national, regional and global security challenges posed by climate change.
“Addressing environmental problems and climate change needs to be part of comprehensive security, as these pose a threat to global security,” said OSCE Chair-in-Office, Finland’s Minister for Foreign Affairs Elina Valtonen, in her opening remarks. “We need strategic foresight, multilateral co-operation, adaptation, and a whole-of-society approach for better preparedness and stronger resilience. Building resilience against climate shocks will provide a buffer against other risks.”
The Conference brought together around 250 participants from OSCE participating States, Partners for Co-operation, international organizations, local administrations, businesses, civil society, and academia. It addressed a wide range of specific challenges, from the environmental and climate impacts of the war in Ukraine to strategies for strengthening responses to climate related threats to security. It also promoted public-private partnerships and inclusive, whole-of-society approaches.
The OSCE’s unique capacities to support commitments and strengthen resilience were key topics of the event. Discussions focused in particular on the role of the comprehensive approach to security.
“Climate change is a threat multiplier. It aggravates existing vulnerabilities, fuels instability, and undermines the foundations of peace and prosperity,” said Sari Multala, Finnish Minister of the Environment. “We must recognize that climate change is part of a broader triple planetary crisis — alongside biodiversity loss and pollution, accelerating land degradation and desertification.”
Bakyt Dzhusupov, Co-ordinator of OSCE Economic and Environmental Activities, echoed concerns over the adverse effects of climate change on stability and stressed that women and youth are affected disproportionally. Recalling the 2021 OSCE Ministerial Council Decision on Strengthening Co-operation to Address the Challenges of Climate Change and corresponding activities of his Office, he stressed the need for collaborative, holistic responses.
While the Conference reiterated the urgent need for collective action to tackle climate risks and its related security implications, it also underscored the current obstacles to co-operation.
“Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine has shattered the post Cold-War stability, altering the European security landscape. The war has caused immeasurable damage to the environment,” said Minister Valtonen.
The outcomes of the Conference will contribute to an upcoming study on the OSCE’s role and work related to the climate, peace and security agenda. The study, to be publish later in 2025, will take stock of progress and initiatives since the adoption of the 2021 OSCE Ministerial Council Decision
This year’s conference was the third conference on climate change and was organized by the 2025 Finnish OSCE Chairpersonship in collaboration with a wide range of partners, including the Finnish Ministry of the Environment, WWF Finland, Hanaholmen and the city of Espoo. It built on earlier OSCE discussions on climate and security, particularly drawing on the 2024 Climate Conference organized by the Maltese Chairpersonship and the inaugural OSCE Secretary General High-Level Conference convened in Vienna in 2023.
Further discussions on practical solutions for strengthening climate resilience are also planned to continue in September in Prague. This event will provide a platform for OSCE participating States and Partners for Co-operation to exchange views on foresight mechanisms, technological solutions, inclusive approaches, and policy frameworks aimed at securing a sustainable and safe future for all.
The summary document of the OSCE Chairpersonship Conference on Climate and Security is available here: https://www.osce.org/chairpersonship/592996.
Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments
Scientists comment on a drought status confirmed in Yorkshire, as announced by the Environment Agency.
Dr Jess Neumann, Associate Professor in Hydrology, University of Reading, said:
“The drought announcement in Yorkshire comes only a few weeks after parts of north-west England declared a drought.
“An unseasonably dry spring, the driest in nearly 90 years, means many reservoir levels are only 60-65% full, well below the 80-85% average for this time of year. The lack of rainfall is placing significant strain on public water supplies, affecting agricultural crop production, and harming wildlife and the environment.
“Water companies are implementing their drought action plans as another warm and dry week is forecast ahead. Small actions and changes to behaviour can have an important role to play. People should be mindful of their water use, and I would urge everyone to develop water-saving habits. Small actions such as capturing water from the tap in a jug while waiting for it to run hot, turning taps off when brushing your teeth, and using a watering can rather than a hose in the garden may prevent harsher restrictions, such as so-called “hosepipe bans” being needed, in the coming weeks and months.
“Two large areas of England are now in drought status. This raises important questions about the security of our water in the long term. Water is no longer abundant and plentiful. We urgently need to adjust to a future of climate change and water stress and invest in infrastructure and regulations to save water.
“At the same time, the forecast for the UK is suggesting that there is potential for some torrential downpours and thunderstorms, which may bring rapid flash flooding, especially to the west of England and Wales, but with eastern England, southern Scotland and Northern Ireland also at risk.
“The recent dry weather conditions, which can lead to dry soils or baked, hard ground, may actually increase run-off rates, potentially increasing the risk of hazardous flash flooding.
“Currently the UK is sandwiched between high pressure to the east and low pressure in the west, driving hot, humid air across the country, creating conditions for active thunderstorms.
“The current climatic picture in the UK shows water stress and uncertainty in some regions while other areas are facing risks of flooding. This pattern of extreme weather and regional variability is in keeping with the impacts of the hotter atmosphere and warmer, higher seas that we are already experiencing as a result of our increasingly changing climate.”
Declared interests
Jess Neumann: “I am a trustee of the Charity River Mole River Watch. We work with water companies including SES Water and the Environment Agency.”
Source: The Conversation – USA – By Magali A. Delmas, Professor of Management, Institute of the Environment and Sustainability, Anderson School of Management, University of California, Los Angeles
Since the early 1990s, the small blue Energy Star label has appeared on millions of household appliances, electronics and even buildings across the United States. But as the Trump administration considers terminating some or all of the program, it is worth a look at what exactly this government-backed label means, and why it has become one of the most recognizable environmental certifications in the country.
Energy Star was launched by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency in 1992 and later expanded in partnership with the Department of Energy with a simple goal: making it easier for consumers and businesses to choose energy-efficient products, helping them reduce energy use and save money, without sacrificing quality or performance.
As a scholar of energy conservation, I have studied the Energy Star program’s development and public impact, including how it has shaped consumer behavior and environmental outcomes.
Products that earn the Energy Star certification typically use significantly less energy than standard models, often between 10% and 50% less. The energy – and financial – savings can add up quickly, especially when homes or buildings have multiple Energy Star appliances and systems.
Energy Star itself does not manufacture or sell products. Instead, it acts as a trusted third-party certifier, providing consumers and businesses with reliable information and clear labeling. It also offers information to help people estimate energy savings and compare long-term costs, making it easier to identify high-performing, cost-effective options. Manufacturers participating in Energy Star seek to improve their environmental reputation and increase their market share, giving them a strong incentive to meet the program’s efficiency criteria.
Today, the label appears on refrigerators, dishwashers, laptops, commercial buildings and even newly built homes. The government says people in more than 90% of American households recognize the label.
Energy Star-certified appliances include upright freezers, clothes washers and many other types of home equipment, which use between 10% and 50% less energy than uncertified items. AP Photo/Joshua A. Bickel
People don’t always choose efficient products
Energy Star seeks to tackle a wide range of problems that can result in people deciding not to buy energy-efficient products.
One problem is that efficient models often come with higher up-front costs. While efficient models save money over time, that higher purchase price can discourage buyers. Energy Star helps counter this problem by clearly showing how much money can be saved on energy costs over the lifetime of the product – as compared with noncertified products – and by offering rebates that reduce the initial expense.
Another problem involves what economists call “split incentives.” A landlord might not want to pay a higher price up front for energy-efficient appliances if the tenants are the ones who will save money on the utility bills. And renters may not want to spend a lot of money on appliances or equipment in a place they do not own. Energy Star tries to bridge this divide by promoting whole-building certifications, which encourage landlords to invest in their buildings’ energy efficiency with the goal of making their properties more attractive to tenants.
The countless varieties of refrigerators, dishwashers, air conditioners and other items on the market can also create confusion. Consumers who just look at manufacturers’ promotional material may find it very hard to determine which appliances truly deliver better energy efficiency. The Energy Star label makes this comparison easier: If the label is there, it is among the most efficient choices available.
And consumers are often skeptical of manufacturers’ claims – especially when it comes to new technologies or environmental promises. Energy Star’s status as a program backed by the government, rather than a private company, gives it a level of independence and credibility that many other labels lack. People know the certification is based on science, not sales tactics.
Lastly, Energy Star helps overcome the problem that many people are not aware of how much energy their appliances consume, or how those choices contribute to climate change. By connecting everyday products to larger environmental outcomes, Energy Star helps consumers understand the effects of their decisions, without needing to become energy experts.
The program delivers real results
Since its inception, more than 800,000 appliance models have earned Energy Star certification based on the criteria for their type of product.
The same principles that make the label valuable for consumer appliances – independent certification, clear metrics and a focus on results – have proved equally effective in real estate. Nearly 45,000 commercial buildings and industrial plants have earned certification. And there have been more than 2.5 million Energy Star-certified homes and apartments built in the U.S.
Energy Star-certified homes are designed to be at least 10% more energy efficient than those built to standard building codes, with more insulation and windows and lights that are energy-efficient, as well as appliances. These enhancements can translate to better quality, comfort and long-term cost savings for homeowners.
Commercial buildings, which account for about 18% of total U.S. energy use, have also benefited substantially. Research I was involved in found that certified commercial buildings use an average of 19% less energy than their noncertified counterparts.
Energy Star’s status as a government-led label contributes to its credibility as a more neutral and science-based source of information than commercial labels.
Energy Star’s government connections also bring scale: By requiring federal purchases to have Energy Star certifications, the federal government can influence manufacturers. For example, a federal executive order in 1993 required government agencies to purchase only computers that had been Energy Star-certified, which required them to have energy-saving sleep functions.
In response, manufacturers began including the feature so they could sell their products to the government. Consumers soon came to expect the sleep feature on all computers.
A quiet success story in energy and climate
Energy Star does not grab headlines. It does not rely on regulation or mandates. Yet it has quietly become one of the most effective tools the U.S. has for improving energy efficiency across homes, offices and public buildings.
That said, the program is not without its limitations. Some critics have pointed out that not all certified products consistently perform at the highest efficiency levels. Other critics note that the benefits of Energy Star are more accessible to wealthier consumers who can afford up-front investments, even with available rebates. And the EPA itself has, at times, struggled to manage the certification process and update standards in line with the latest technological advances.
At a time when energy costs and climate concerns are rising, Energy Star stands out as a rare example of a practical, nonpartisan program that delivers real benefits. It helps individuals, businesses and communities save money, lower emissions and take part in a more sustainable future – one smart decision at a time.
Magali Delmas received funding from the US EPA in 2002 for research on Environmental Management Strategies and Corporate Performance.
Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments
Press release
Yorkshire second region in England to move into drought status
Yorkshire has become the second region to enter drought status following the driest spring in 132 years.
Yorkshire has become the second region to enter drought status following the driest spring in 132 years.
The Environment Agency announced the change in status today (12th June 2025) following declining river flows and groundwater levels because of the dry March, April and May.
The decision sees the regulator stepping up its operational response in Yorkshire, whilst making sure water companies deliver the actions agreed in their drought plans.
This includes speeding up the fixing of leaks and communicating with customers on how to reduce demand to preserve supplies.
In the meantime, the National Drought Group will continue to meet regularly over the summer and is receiving updates on the situation.
Claire Barrow, Yorkshire Environment, Planning and Engagement Manager, said:
Our climate is changing, and we had 22 days of almost no recorded rainfall in May.
While we have had some rain at the start of June, it has not been enough to reverse the impacts of the prolonged dry weather.
We are working with Yorkshire Water to make sure they enact their drought plans. We also encourage people to be aware of the environmental impacts of droughts as we enter the summer period and note the small steps we can all take to save water.
Water Minister Emma Hardy said:
I am receiving regular updates from the Environment Agency.
I’m doing everything in my power to hold Yorkshire Water to account to ensure we have the regular supply of water that is needed across the region.
The government is taking decisive action to secure our water supply for the decades to come. That’s why we are building nine new reservoirs and upgrading pipes to cut leakage by 17%.
The north-west of England entered drought status on 21st May. The recent wet weather in the region has helped stabilise the situation and improve reservoir levels, but the area remains in drought.
Yorkshire received 66% of the long-term average May rainfall while England has experienced its driest spring since 1893.
Across the country, England has only seen 57% of the long-term average rainfall for last month. Three areas – the north-east, east and west midlands – are also experiencing prolonged dry weather.
Periods of dry weather and low rivers can have several consequences for the environment and wildlife. Low oxygen levels in water can lead to fish kills, as well as more algal blooms and lower river flows prevent wildlife from moving up or downstream. The EA has moved over 500 native, white-clawed crayfish to a safer location as experts are concerned about water flow in the area.
Hot and dry weather can increase wildfires, severely damaging vulnerable areas of heathland and moorland. Yorkshire has seen several wildfires on the Pennine moorland, including large fires at Marsden Moor, Wessenden, and Rishworth Moor.
Crop failure is also a major impact of drought while low water levels make navigation difficult on canals and some rivers.
There are a number of closures and restrictions in place to preserve water across the Canal & River Trust network, predominantly on the Leeds & Liverpool Canal.
There are simple ways people can help save water, including taking shorter showers, using water from the kitchen to water plants, and fixing leaky toilets.
Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments
Speech
Strengthening the Economic and Environmental Dimension: UK Statement to the OSCE
Ambassador Neil Holland stresses the importance of the Economic and Environmental Dimension of the OSCE as part of its comprehensive approach to security.
Thank you, Mr Chair.
The Second Dimension is vital to the OSCE’s comprehensive security approach. It addresses some of the most pressing challenges to our shared security and prosperity, including climate change, biodiversity loss, serious and organised crime, illicit finance, and the growing issue of irregular migration. This is particularly important given the devastating economic and environmental impact of Russia’s war of aggression on Ukraine.
The OSCE is uniquely positioned to assist participating States in tackling these complex issues. To do so we need to fully leverage the tools at our disposal — especially those that support good governance by promoting transparency, combatting illicit finance, and reducing corruption. Our Foreign Secretary’s campaign on illicit finance is a key example of the UK’s efforts to combat corruption and strengthen national security.
The UK values the OSCE’s role in addressing security-related environmental concerns, such as water management, energy security, and the impacts of climate change. We are proud to support the OSCE project on strengthening responses to security risks from climate change in Central Asia. We acknowledge the particular vulnerabilities of Central Asian states to climate change and its consequences. To address these challenges, we are funding a regional programme to enhance resilience through regional water and energy cooperation for low-carbon, climate-resilient growth.
As Chair of the Security Committee, the UK is prioritising key areas that intersect with the Second Dimension – particularly the financial underpinnings of organised crime which we will deal with in July’s meeting. These crimes cause both direct and indirect harm to our citizens, eroding social cohesion, undermining democratic norms, exacerbating climate change, and impeding economic development. They contribute to instability and conflict and also disproportionately affect women and girls, which is one of the many reasons why the UK supports the OSCE’s emphasis on Women’s economic empowerment.
April’s Security Committee meeting focused on the security threats associated with irregular migration, recommending that the OSCE work together with other international organisations, including through field presences, to support States in countering the smuggling of migrants and other challenges. It is clear that the OSCE can and should be doing more on migrant smuggling. We will follow up on this in September when we mark the 20-year anniversary of the Border Security and Management Concept. Later this year, with our Slovenian colleagues, we will also host a joint session of the Security, and Environmental and Economic Committees on protecting critical infrastructure.
We will continue to support a strong and effective Second Dimension, including through the EEF cycle. As we approach the Helsinki discussions on organisational functionality a good place to start would be to fulfil the requirements set out by Ministers on holding mandated conferences according to the timetable laid out by them.
Source: International Marine Contractors Association – IMCA
Headline: IMCA launches IMCA Awards 2025 celebrating innovation and impact in marine contracting
This year’sIMCA Awardsare now open for entries, with new categories celebrating outstanding achievement in Innovation and Technology, and People Development, as well as a new Rising Star award to recognise the next generation of talented marine contractors.
The marine contracting industry’s premier awards – sponsored this year by global marine contractor McDermott International and diving contractor Unidive Subsea – return in 2025 to showcase innovative and impactful projects led by IMCA Members.
Last year’s three award categories, Health and Safety Project of the Year, Environmental Sustainability Project of the Year, and the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Project of the Year, which recognises progress in reducing greenhouse gas emissions – all return in 2025.
The winners will be announced atIMCA’s Global Summit Gala Dinner, which will take place on 26 November inKuala Lumpur, Malaysia, on the middle night of IMCA’s two-day flagship event. Global Summit tickets, which include entry to the Gala Dinner, are available at a reduced rate until 30 June – find out more here.
Jim Cullen, Technical Director, IMCA said: “We’re excited to share the return of the IMCA Awards, which are a great opportunity to celebrate outstanding achievement, promote innovative projects and approaches, and champion best-practice from across our membership.
“AI and new technology are rapidly changing our industry and creating the need for new skills and training, so it is only right that our Members’ work in response to these opportunities is celebrated through new awards for technological innovation and people development. We also want to celebrate the next generation of talented early-career professionals that are coming through the ranks.
“I would like to offer my thanks to McDermott International and Unidive Subsea for becoming our first IMCA Award sponsors.”
The awards are open to IMCA Members only. A judging panel, made up of selected Committee members, IMCA Secretariat leads, Committee Chairs, and IMCA Global Summit sponsors, will review the entries in a formal and independent scoring process. Shortlisted companies will be announced in the Autumn. The deadline for entries is Monday 1 September 2025.
Find out more about the judging process and criteria, and enter IMCA Awards 2025, here.
For the first time, sponsorship opportunities are available to sponsor individual awards. To find out more about sponsorship and exhibition opportunities at the IMCA Awards and IMCA Global Summit, please contact events@imca-int.com.
The full list of IMCA Awards can be seen below:
Health and Safety Project of the Year – Recognising excellence in health and safety performance.
Greenhouse Gas Reduction Project of the Year – Promoting success in reducing operational and value chain emissions.
Environmental Sustainability Project of the Year – Highlighting projects designed to support environmental sustainability in offshore or marine environments.
People Development Project of the Year – Recognising people-focussed initiatives including skills and training, diversity initiatives, and projects to attract new talent to the sector.
Innovation and Technology Project of the Year – Rewarding advancements in digital transformation, AI, and technological innovation.
Rising Star Award – Celebrating the achievements of an early-career professional with fewer than five years’ experience in the marine contracting industry.
Discover last year’s winning entries, submitted by DeepOcean, Subsea7 and the National Oceanography Centre, and Solstad Offshore, here.
CAFA membership will enable IMCA to access best practice case studies and resources from other business sectors to better support Members’ work to minimise their environmental impact and transition to a low-carbon and climate resilient economy.
Mary Ntamark, IMCA’s Technical Adviser for Environmental Sustainability, said: “We are delighted to join CAFA. This partnership enables us to collaborate with a powerful network of membership organisations, access tailored resources, and participate in peer-to-peer learning and working groups focused on climate action and resilience. Working with other business sectors, we can make a meaningful impact and bring important insights to our work with IMCA Members.”
IMCA’s Greenhouse Gas Committee and Environmental Sustainability Committees are engaged in numerous projects in support of Members’ work to enhance the sustainability of their operations, such as reducing greenhouse gas emissions from vessels, implementing circular economy principles in supply chains, and projects to support marine biodiversity.
Plymouth is celebrating a proud moment after scooping two prestigious awards last night – recognising the city’s leadership in both environmental innovation and inclusive employment.
The prestigious Local Government Chronicle (LGC) Awards 2025, recognise the best in local government, with judges having to consider over 1,000 submissions from councils across the UK.
At a ceremony last night, the city was honoured in the Environmental Services category for our pioneering Habitat Bank, and in Diversity and Inclusion for our transformative Supported Internships programme.
These awards shine a spotlight on the incredible work being done across Plymouth to build a greener, fairer future – and the dedicated teams making it happen.
Plymouth’s Habitat Bank, delivered through the city’s green finance vehicle Ocean City Nature, will deliver an impressive £7m in investment to restore and enhance habitats across the city. The initiative is creating a local market for Biodiversity Units, helping developers meet planning requirements while delivering real gains for nature and communities with work on the first site at Ham Woods already underway.
Councillor Tom Briars Delve, Plymouth City Council Cabinet Member for Climate Change and Environment, said: “This award is a huge recognition of the bold, creative work happening in Plymouth to tackle the ecological emergency. The Habitat Bank is a brilliant example of how we can use green finance to deliver real, lasting benefits for wildlife and communities. I’m incredibly proud of the team behind this – their passion and innovation are helping to put Plymouth on the map as a leader in nature recovery.”
At the same time, the city’s Supported Internships programme scooped the top award in its category. Run in partnership with Discovery College – the programme has grown from just nine participants to 67 in just two years. The programme supports young people with learning difficulties or disabilities to gain meaningful, sustainable employment through a blend of tailored work placements, coaching and classroom learning. Every single participant has gone on to secure a job – a remarkable achievement that’s changing lives.
Councillor Sally Cresswell, Cabinet Member for Education, Skills and Apprenticeships, added: “This award is a celebration of the young people who’ve taken part in Supported Internships – and the incredible staff who’ve supported them every step of the way. It shows what’s possible when we believe in people’s potential and invest in inclusive opportunities. This work is vital to building a city where everyone can thrive.”
LEICESTER schools and workplaces are getting ready to take part in Clean Air Day next week.
Clean Air Day, on Thursday 19 June, is the UK’s biggest initiative to reduce air pollution, raising awareness about air quality and encouraging action for a healthier environment.
Selected roads will be closed to traffic so that sports, games and fun activities can be held out on the streets in front of several schools in Leicester.
Among the schools taking part in Leicester are Castle Mead Academy, which will be running sporting activities on the street and waterside activities in conjunction with the Canal & River Trust and Leicester Outdoor Pursuits Centre, including a ‘park and paddle’ where pupils will be able to arrive at school by bell boat.
Dovelands Primary School will have sports on the streets, cycling activities and the Hop! fully electric green bus, with its signature ‘ribbit’ effect bell, will pay a visit. The Children’s Bookbus will be at Kestrel Mead Infants School, and there will be sport on the street outside Rushey Mead Primary School, as well as a visit from Strider the walking mascot.
Temporary road closures will be in place on Thursday 19 June from 8am until 4pm on Magnus Road, Bessingham Close, Richard III Road, Eastfield Road, Hazeldene Road and Bramble Close.
Parking, waiting and loading will be prohibited from 8am on Wednesday 18 June until 4pm on Thursday 19 June 2025 on sections of Mundesley Road, Kestrel Lane, Richard III Road, Maidenwell Avenue, Foxglove Road and Laverton Road.
Some of the city’s largest workplaces are also getting involved in Clean Air Day. The University of Leicester has organised a walk in Victoria Park, meeting at the memorial arch at 12pm. The walk is suitable for all abilities and is open to staff, students and the public. Researchers from the Centre for Environmental Health and Sustainability, who work on air quality and pollutants, will be taking part in the walk and will be available to discuss their research, how air pollution impacts health and ways we can all support reductions in air pollution.
The University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust will have information stands in hospital restaurants in the run-up to Clean Air Day, offering advice and information to staff and the public on how they can help reduce air pollution, with information on travel, food and nutrition, energy use and some simple flash card quizzes.
The events are being supported by Leicester City Council, national walking, wheeling and cycling charity Sustrans and Living Streets, the UK charity for everyday walking, as well as by the Canal & River Trust and Leicester Outdoor Pursuits Centre.
Assistant city mayor responsible for air quality, Cllr Geoff Whittle, said: “Clean Air Day is a chance for schools to take part in some fun activities on traffic-free streets, while delivering an important message about improving air quality.
“It’s also a great chance for local workplaces to get involved by promoting the benefits of active travel.
“It is very encouraging to see so many people across the city marking Clean Air Day in this way.”
The city council’s air quality action plan includes commitments to carry out education and awareness campaigns in communities and schools to improve knowledge and understanding of the main sources of pollution and their impact, as well as working with schools to encourage active travel.
The Government of Jersey has published its full response to the Arcadis Hydrogeological Risk Assessment Report on the current state of PFAS in surface water and groundwater around Jersey airport.
The Minister for the Environment fully accepts the majority of the report’s recommendations and has already begun implementing key actions:
A steering group has been set up which brings together the Government, Ports of Jersey, and Jersey Water to develop a coordinated remediation strategy that includes immediate, medium-, and long-term options
Further testing of water, soil, and outfalls is underway to address gaps in knowledge
Additional monitoring will take place this summer to track the movement of PFAS from and around the airport site
Officers have identified properties drawing water from boreholes within the updated plume area and are providing direct environmental health advice and support to affected households. Testing of private supplies is already taking place
Arcadis has also been asked to present its findings to the Independent PFAS Scientific Advisory Panel and support them with their upcoming report on PFAS in the Environment (Report 4).
The independent report by Arcadis, a world leading environmental consultancy, assessed PFAS across the St Ouen’s Bay and Upper Pont Marquet areas, and found that the extent of affected groundwater near the airport (the “plume area”) is larger than previously understood.
There is no immediate risk to the health of the broader population, as Jersey Water do not draw water from these impacted catchment areas for public water supply.
The report evaluates and shortlists a wide range of remediation options for the affected soil, groundwater and surface water.
The Minister for the Environment, Deputy Steve Luce, said: “This independent report gives us the clearest picture yet of PFAS in groundwater and surface water around the airport.
“I have fully accepted the majority of the report’s recommendations and decisive action is already underway. If necessary, I am prepared to use regulatory powers to ensure progress is made at the pace we need to protect our environment and public health.
“I want to reassure Islanders that there is no immediate risk to public health. Our public water supply continues to meet EU and UK standards for PFAS levels, and Jersey Water has already taken steps to avoid drawing from impacted sources.”
Deputy Luce will be hosting a public meeting at 6 pm on Wednesday 18 June to hear Islanders’ views and answer questions.
Environment Secretary leads a new push with business to restore nature
• Environment Secretary Steve Reed has brought business leaders and investors together to scale up private investment in nature
Woods and fields
Government launches Call for Evidence on boosting private sector investment in nature recovery, delivering a key recommendation of the Corry Review.
Action supports the Government’s aims to secure long-term economic growth and environmental health as part of the Plan for Change.
Environment Secretary Steve Reed champions private investment in nature recovery as the government launches a new call for evidence (12 June).
Speaking to leading figures from financial institutions, property, retail and sustainability sectors at a roundtable event in London, the Environment Secretary emphasised the importance of fostering partnerships between the public and private sectors to support economic growth while powering nature recovery.
Businesses across the UK, whether in food and agriculture, construction, finance, or retail, rely on a healthy natural environment to operate, grow and innovate.
Whether powering our industries, safeguarding our food security or protecting public health, over half of global GDP is highly or moderately dependent upon nature. England’s natural capital is valued at £1.4 trillion and generates over £35 billion worth of economic benefits annually excluding oil and gas, more than any single manufacturing sector.
That is why more private sector investment in nature recovery is vital. To help deliver that increased investment a new government Call for Evidence has launched today seeking ideas from business and investors – delivering a key recommendation of the Corry Review and the commitments made in the Land Use Framework consultation.
Environment Secretary Steve Reed said:
“Nature is essential to strong and sustained economic growth, which is this Government’s highest priority.
“Private investment will help us to protect and restore our natural environment while creating new economic opportunities as part of the Plan for Change.
“This is an exciting opportunity to hear from businesses, investors, and other stakeholders on how we can work together to increase investment in nature.”
Dr Rhian-Mari Thomas, OBE, CEO of the Green Finance Institute, said:
“Unlocking the billions needed for UK nature restoration hinges on effective revenue models. UK businesses, as buyers of environmental outcomes, are crucial in creating those revenue models, and we’re looking forward to supporting Defra in better understanding how we can encourage and support business engagement.”
Andrew Walton, Chief Sustainability Officer, Lloyds Banking Group said:
“As the UK’s largest infrastructure finance provider, we know how blended finance can help deliver a step change in private investment to drive sustainable growth. We welcome the Government’s ambition on nature markets and the opportunity to establish the UK as a global leader in this important area. Robust standards, reliable data and long-term policy direction are key to building confidence in the investment case for nature and can place it at the heart of UK growth.”
The roundtable, hosted by Lloyds Banking Group and led in partnership with the Green Finance Institute (GFI), brought together leaders from across finance and business, including leaders from Aviva Investors, Barclays, Barratt Homes and more.
Defra will partner with the GFI to engage businesses on the call for evidence and wider nature finance priorities –alongside ongoing work with UK businesses to implement the recommendations of the Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures (TNFD).
Promoting investment opportunities in nature creates opportunities for business growth across multiple sectors, including farmers looking to diversify their revenues, agri-food businesses securing supply chain resilience, insurers and water companies reducing costs from floods, droughts, and pollution, developers managing climate and environmental risks to new homes and infrastructure, as well as growth in the tourism and recreational sectors.
The meeting also discussed the next steps for the Big Nature Impact Fund, the Defra-backed public-private blended impact fund for nature. Finance Earth will act as sole fund manager and will begin fund-raising soon. The Fund will invest in woodland creation, peatland restoration and other habitat creation projects that aim to maximise social and environmental impact by funding the right activity in the right place.
The Call for Evidence will be open for responses until 10 August 2025.
ENDS
Notes to Editors:
· For more information on the Call for Evidence, visit:
Wednesday 30th April, 2025. To mark the first 100 days of Trump’s second term, Greenpeace UK revealed a 55m by 40m artwork on the beach outside Trump’s golf course in Scotland, ‘Trump Turnberry’, showing a giant portrait of the US President raked into the sand with the message: “Time to resist – fight the billionaire takeover”.
Pictures and drone footage of the artwork can be found here
Areeba Hamid, co-executive director of Greenpeace UK, said:
“During his first 100 days President Trump has been actively working to dismantle and weaken environmental protections and attack those who fight to protect nature and our shared climate, putting the corporate profits of his billionaire friends ahead of people and the planet.It’s time to resist the billionaire takeover of our rights and freedoms.”
The artwork took several hours to draw out in the sand overnight, by a team from arts organisation ‘Sand in Your Eye’ and Greenpeace UK.
Areeba continued: “Trump’s biggest allies are a group of unelected billionaires, including the fossil fuel company CEOs who are knowingly burning the planet, polluting our waters, and hurting communities around the world. No one voted for these corporate bullies to end free speech, but they will stop at nothing to keep their oil and gas empire alive – even weaponising the legal system to crush dissent and silence environmental activism.”
A key weapon being used by the oligarchy against those advocating for a green, just future is SLAPP lawsuits, like the one waged against Greenpeace in the US and Greenpeace International by the fossil fuel pipeline giant Energy Transfer. In a recent verdict, a US jury found Greenpeace International and Greenpeace in the US liable for over $660 million to Energy Transfer — a company headed by billionaire and Trump donor Kelcy Warren.
Areeba added: “For the billionaires and big oil companies this is not just another source of money. They want to silence all critics and any protests against the core issue with their business: fossil fuels that are causing the climate crisis and environmental destruction.”
Greenpeace UK activists have also been subvertising bus stops around the US embassy in Nine Elms, London, with posters carrying the same messaging.
Notes Pictures and drone footage of the artwork in Scotland, and pictures and video of the subvertising in London, will be uploaded through the morning: https://media.greenpeace.org/Detail/27MZIFJVLMGCJ
Today’s protests are part of a global campaign, ‘Time to Resist’. Pictures and footage from other ‘Time to Resist’ protests in other countries will be posted here as they become available: https://media.greenpeace.org/Detail/27MZIFJVLHH00
Commenting on Shell’s Q1 profits, Charlie Kronick, senior climate adviser for Greenpeace UK, said:
“Shell is reporting billions in profits in the same week as the Climate Change Committee has warned the UK government isn’t adequately dealing with massively costly floods, wildfires and heatwaves. It’s simply not fair to leave households and businesses to pay for flood damage and taxpayers to foot the bill for emergency response while oil giants are making a fortune. It’s their mess, and they should pay to clean it up. Ministers should bring in new taxes on big polluters and use the funds to help communities recover from extreme weather, boost emergency services and make Britain more resilient against the climate crisis Shell is fuelling.”
Pictures of the Westminster rally can be foundhere
Today (Wednesday), a coalition of trade unions and climate groups are rallying outside Parliament to ask the Chancellor for an emergency funding package of £1.9 billion per year for North Sea workers ahead of the Spending Review. A funding package on this scale is urgently needed for oil and gas and supply chain workers to make the transition into renewable energy jobs, ensuring that workers and communities benefit, says the coalition. The group is also joined at the rally by politicians from Labour, SNP and the Green Party.
The call is endorsed by the largest union representing UK offshore workers, Unite the Union, as well as the National Union of Rail and Maritime and Transport Workers (RMT), the Public and Commercial Services Union (PCS), and Aberdeen’s Trades Union Councils. 65 climate groups including Greenpeace UK, Uplift, Friends of the Earth Scotland, Oil Change International, Global Justice Now, Extinction Rebellion and Platform are also part of the coalition.
The £1.9 billion emergency funding package to create permanent, unionised renewable energy jobs and support the country’s oil and gas workers to transition into them is comprised of:
£1.1 billion per year to develop permanent, local jobs in public and community-owned wind manufacturing.
£440 million of further investment each year for ports, on top of the £1.8 billion already committed through the National Wealth Fund.
£355 million per year to develop a dedicated training fund for offshore oil and gas workers, with match-funding from industry.
As the North Sea basin’s reserves decline, the wider oil and gas sector has lost 227,000 jobs in the past 10 years. This is despite the UK government issuing roughly 400 new drilling licences over the same period, and energy companies making record-breaking profits.
The coalition outlines that oil and gas companies consistently fail to invest in renewable energy jobs and retraining for their workers, whilst prioritising shareholder profits and cutting or offshoring jobs that should stay here in the UK. Just last week, Harbour Energy, which has handed £1 billion to its shareholders in the past three years, announced it would cut a further 250 jobs from its offshore workforce, and two weeks ago, multinational Petroineos ceased operations at Grangemouth oil refinery without a transition plan for the workforce.
Commenting, Mel Evans, climate team leader at Greenpeace UK, said:
“It’s vital that we don’t leave oil and gas workers’ future in the hands of private companies who put their profits above workers’ security and the climate time and time again.
“That’s why Rachel Reeves must commit to this emergency package of funding to protect workers and their communities. If she fails to act, she leaves their livelihoods at the mercy of greedy oil bosses and will undermine community confidence in the transition to renewable energy.
“We urgently need a renewable energy system fit for the twenty-first century that can bring down bills, helping our energy security and the climate at the same time. But we must bring workers and communities along and ensure that wind manufacturing and renewable energy jobs stay here in the UK, rather than leaving other countries to benefit from the booming green economy.”
Claire Peden, Unite for a Workers’ Economy team lead, said:
“The UK government must deliver a real, robust plan that guarantees good, secure jobs for oil and gas workers as part of the energy transition. So far, that promise hasn’t materialised—yet 30,000 jobs are at risk by 2030. Climate change is an urgent crisis, but it must not be working people who bear the brunt. A just transition needs to be a workers’ transition: no one must be left behind.”
Ruby Earle, Worker Transition Lead at Platform, said:
“No worker should have to wait until crisis point before they get support, like we’ve seen in Scunthorpe. Today, unions and climate campaigners are sending a clear message to the Chancellor. We need urgent public investment that creates permanent, unionised renewable energy jobs and supports the country’s oil and gas workers to move into them. Multinationals have held us to ransom for too long. It’s time we give workers and communities a real stake in our energy industry.”
Offshore wind energy capacity has the potential to grow by as much as six times in the next 15 years. The groups state that public investment now and on this scale would create thousands of long-term, good quality and unionised manufacturing jobs, which oil and gas and supply chain workers could transition into.
The coalition points to huge job losses at Grangemouth and Port Talbot as examples of what happens when the Government leaves the transition entirely in the hands of private companies. Rachel Reeves must step in to provide North Sea workers with the support they need to prevent the repetition of past mistakes.
Ends
Notes to Editors
Contact: Greenpeace UK press office press.uk@greenpeace.org / Florri Burton on 07971177378
The coalition has submitted their demands in advance of the forthcoming Comprehensive Spending Review, their submission can be foundhere. A full list of signatories to the call for emergency funding can be found here
The rally is currently taking place at Abingdon Street Gardens, 5 Great College St, London SW1P 3SE
Speakers at the rally include Rosie Hampton, Just Transition Campaigner at Friends of the Earth Scotland; Amy Cameron, Greenpeace Programme Director; Ruby Earle, Just Transition Campaigner at Platform; Chris Hamilton, Unite the Union convenor at Grangemouth oil refinery; Claire Peden, team lead in Unite the Union’s Organising and Leverage department; Darren Procter, RMT National Secretary; John Moloney, Assistant General Secretary of PCS Union; Steven Gray, Aberdeen Trade’s Council Delegate; Kirsty Blackman, SNP Member of Parliament for Aberdeen North; Carla Denyer, Green Member of Parliament for Bristol Central; Brian Leishman, Member of Parliament for Alloa and Grangemouth
Last month, a petition was delivered to the UK Government, signed by more than 1 million people, calling on the UK government to deliver a fair transition to renewable energy.
North Sea oil and gas firms in the UK are failing to switch their investments to renewable energy, with three-quarters planning to invest solely in continued fossil fuel production between now and 2030.
The European Commission and six EU countries, Cyprus, Finland, Hungary, Latvia, Portugal and Slovenia, have today submitted their ratification of the Global Ocean Treaty at the United Nations headquarters. Despite repeated promises to sign the Treaty into UK law, the UK government is failing to get onboard.
Greenpeace is warning that, while the progress from other European countries is welcome, it is nowhere near enough to ensure the treaty enters into force in 2025, and in time to meet the goal of protecting at least 30% of the ocean by 2030 – agreed by all governments in 2022[1].
The UK was among the first countries to sign the Global Ocean Treaty on 20 September 2023, indicating its intention to pass the Treaty into UK law. The current Labour government has repeatedly said it intends to ratify the Treaty, but has so far failed to introduce the necessary primary legislation to do so or to commit to a timeline. This has prompted calls from the International Development Committee and environmental groups to begin the legislative process urgently. Responsibility for this process lies with Foreign Secretary David Lammy.
Chris Thorne, Greenpeace UK senior ocean campaigner, said:
“David Lammy wants the UK to be a leader on climate and nature, so he can’t afford to miss the boat on signing the Global Ocean Treaty into UK law. The Treaty can help to protect a third of our blue planet from threats like industrial fishing. As international action on ocean protection accelerates, the UK risks turning up empty handed at a key UN conference next month. Lammy must stop failing the ocean which all life on Earth depends on, prioritise ocean protection and urgently secure parliamentary time for the UK to join other European countries in signing the Treaty into law. We hear legislation has been drafted and is ready to go, it just needs pushing over the line.”
The Global Ocean Treaty requires ratification by 60 states to enter into force. Cyprus, Finland, Hungary, Latvia, Portugal and Slovenia have joined the 22 other states that have already deposited their ratification at the UN, making a total of 28 so far, nearly half of the 60 required. Governments had aimed to ratify the Treaty by June’s UN Ocean Conference to ensure that it enters into force quickly enough to protect 30% of the oceans by 2030. This Treaty is the only legal tool which can deliver this target on the high seas[2].
Lukas Meus, Greenpeace Central and Eastern Europe ocean campaigner, said: “It gives us hope to see such a large group of European countries ratifying the Global Ocean Treaty, but it’s still not enough. Governments had targeted the UN Ocean Conference as their deadline to ratify the Treaty, but even with this group of countries, that target is set to be missed. More countries must ratify the Treaty at the UN Ocean Conference, and should also confirm their support for a global moratorium on deep sea mining. Only then could we call this conference a success.”
The UN Ocean Conference is the first high-level meeting after a deep sea mining company submitted the first-ever application to mine the deep sea to the US Government, bypassing the International Seabed Authority (ISA), the regulatory body set up by the United Nations to protect the deep sea as the common heritage of humankind and decide whether deep sea mining can start in the international seabed[3].
With this new looming threat of exploitation, countries must make it clear that deep sea mining must not be allowed to start in 2025 and actively work towards securing a moratorium at the upcoming meeting of the International Seabed Authority in July, just weeks after the UN Ocean Conference (UNOC).
Greenpeace UK is calling on the UK government to:
Prioritise ratifying the Global Ocean Treaty by making time in the parliamentary schedule ahead of UNOC
Speak out in favour of a global moratorium on deep sea mining and use diplomatic influence to build support for this and the multilateral system
Implement a full ban on all forms of destructive fishing, including bottom trawling, in all UK marine protected areas
Work with the British Overseas Territory of Bermuda and other nations to champion one of the world’s first high seas sanctuaries in the Sargasso Sea. This stunning ecosystem supports a plethora of iconic wildlife including humpback whales, dolphins and sea turtles
[1] Cyprus, Finland, Hungary, Latvia, Portugal and Slovenia have joined Palau, Chile, Belize, Seychelles, Monaco, Mauritius, Federated States of Micronesia, Cuba, Maldives, Singapore, Bangladesh, Barbados, Timor Leste, Panama, St. Lucia, Spain, France, Malawi, Marshall Islands, Antigua and Barbuda, Republic of Korea and Costa Rica.
[2] In 2022, during the UN Biodiversity COP15, states agreed on a target of protecting at least 30% of the ocean by 2030, a figure supported by scientists for several years. 2.7% of the global ocean is currently fully or highly protected from human activities, and the figure is just 0.9% for areas of the high seas, which are beyond national jurisdiction. Greenpeace calculates that at the current rate of protection, the 30% target will not be reached until 2107.
[3] In a media statement, the European Commission has said that it “deeply regrets” the US president’s Executive Order that “circumvents” the negotiations in the ISA, and that “it is crucial to recall that its provisions reflect customary international law and are thus binding on all states irrespective of whether they have acceded to the Convention or not.”
Water companies are panicking they will be left unable to dispose of millions of tonnes of sewage sludge due to tougher pollution rules, and rising concern over the contaminants sludge contains.
Read the full investigation with supporting documents from Unearthed, here.
Sewage sludge is the human faeces and other solids left behind when wastewater is cleaned. Around 90% of the UK’s sludge is treated and spread on farmland as a source of nutrients to fertilise crops. However, concern is rising in the UK that this could be introducing damaging levels of contamination to agricultural land.
An analysis for trade association Water UK last year found that in a “worst-case” scenario the industry could be left with “3.4 million wet tonnes” of sludge with nowhere to go, documents obtained by Unearthed under freedom of information laws show.
The key documents not already in the public domain (available via the Unearthedwebsite) include:
National Plan B: water industry analysis of sludge disposal crisis
The National Landbank Assessment Report 2024: water industry capacity modelling
EA CEO internal briefing: prepared by the Environment Agency
Earlier this year, environmental regulators in the United States warned that toxic PFAS ‘forever chemicals’ in sewage sludge spread on American pastures were posing a cancer risk to people who regularly ate meat or dairy from those farms. This came after investigations by Unearthed and others found that sludge destined for British farmland also contained a range of harmful contaminants, including microplastics and forever chemicals.
The water companies fear increased scrutiny of sludge-spreading in the UK could trigger a ‘backlash’ akin to the public outrage they have faced over sewage released into rivers and seas, Unearthed has learned.
Reshima Sharma, political campaigner for Greenpeace UK, said:
“This investigation is yet more proof that we can’t trust the privatised water companies to deal with waste responsibly. So long as they can get away with it, they will just pass any problems on to our countryside and pocket the money they should be investing in solutions.
“In addition to the national scandal of river pollution, their negligence has led to a cocktail of toxic contaminants being spread on the soil that grows our food. The government must stop toxic sludge from being spread on farmland immediately and water companies must be made to pay for disposing of it safely, without passing the buck to bill payers.”
Documents obtained by Unearthed show the Environment Agency (EA) has warned internally that British farmers could stop accepting sludge onto their land. A briefing prepared for the EA’s chief executive warned that if farmers or retailers were to lose confidence in the use of sludge there could be “very serious consequences, as the sludge would have nowhere to go”.
The briefing added that the water industry has “no immediate ‘Plan B’” for the sludge it generates.
But the industry’s most pressing concern is that the government will tighten controls on the amount of fertiliser farmers can use. The EA and the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) are under pressure to clamp down on excessive muck spreading, which is the country’s leading cause of river pollution.
Water companies say this would leave them without enough farmland available to get rid of all their sludge.
Defra has been reviewing its guidance on protecting water from agricultural pollution, and water companies believe reform of the agricultural pollution rules could result in an outright ban on manure spreading in the autumn, when there is less need for nutrients from crops.
According to Water UK, however, around 70% of sewage sludge is spread in the autumn, and “prohibiting or further constraining that practice would introduce very large and unquantified costs” for the water companies.
Companies are uncertain how much it would cost to deal with a sudden shortfall of this kind, but they estimate it would run to hundreds of millions of pounds. Some have suggested that it could reach billions, potentially resulting in an unplanned increase in household water bills.
ENDS
Notes
Read the full investigation with references, links and supporting documents on Unearthedhere.
Jakarta, June 3, 2025 – Greenpeace Indonesia activists, alongside four young West Papuans from the Raja Ampat archipelago, staged a peaceful protest today to expose the devastating environmental and social consequences of nickel mining and smelting. While Deputy Minister for Foreign Affairs, Arief Havas Oegroseno, addressed the Indonesia Critical Minerals Conference in Jakarta, the activists deployed a banner reading, “What’s the True Cost of Your Nickel?” and unfurled others with messages: “Nickel Mines Destroy Lives” and “Save Raja Ampat from Nickel Mining.”
Through this direct action, Greenpeace aims to deliver an urgent message to the Indonesian government, nickel industry executives gathered at the event, and the wider public: nickel mining and processing are inflicting profound suffering on affected communities across Eastern Indonesia. The industry is razing forests, polluting vital water sources, rivers, seas, and air, and is exacerbating the climate crisis through its reliance on captive coal-fired power plants for processing.
“While the government and mining oligarchs discuss expanding the nickel industry at this conference, communities and our planet are already paying an unbearable price,” said Iqbal Damanik, Greenpeace Indonesia Forest Campaigner. “The relentless industrialization of nickel – accelerated by soaring demand for electric cars – has destroyed forestlands, rivers, and seas from Morowali, Konawe Utara, Kabaena, and Wawonii, to Halmahera and Obi. Now, nickel mining even threatens Raja Ampat in West Papua, a globally renowned biodiversity hotspot often called the last paradise on Earth.”
Following an investigative journey through West Papua, Greenpeace exposed mining activities on several islands within the Raja Ampat archipelago, including Gag Island, Kawe Island, and Manuran Island. These three are classified as small islands and, under the law concerning the management of coastal areas and small islands, should be off-limits to mining.
Greenpeace analysis reveals that nickel exploitation on these three islands has already led to the destruction of over 500 hectares of forest and specialised native vegetation. Extensive documentation shows soil runoff causing turbidity and sedimentation in coastal waters – a direct threat to Raja Ampat’s delicate coral reefs and marine ecosystems – as a result of deforestation and excavation.
Beyond Gag, Kawe, and Manuran, other small islands in Raja Ampat such as Batang Pele and Manyaifun are also under imminent threat from nickel mining. These two adjacent islands are situated approximately 30 kilometers from Piaynemo, the iconic karst island formation pictured on Indonesia’s Rp100,000 banknote.
Raja Ampat is celebrated for its extraordinary terrestrial and marine biodiversity. Its waters are home to 75 percent of the world’s coral species and over 2,500 species of fish. The islands themselves support 47 mammal species and 274 bird species. UNESCO has designated the Raja Ampat region as a global geopark.
Ronisel Mambrasar, a West Papuan youth from the Raja Ampat Nature Guardians (Aliansi Jaga Alam Raja Ampat), said, “Raja Ampat is in grave danger due to the presence of nickel mines on several islands, including my own home in Manyaifun and Batang Pele Islands. Nickel mining threatens our very existence. It will not only destroy the sea that has sustained our livelihoods for generations but is also fracturing the harmony of our communities, sowing conflict where there was once harmony.”
Greenpeace Indonesia urgently calls on the government to fundamentally reassess its nickel industrialization policies, which have already triggered a cascade of problems. The hollow boasts about the benefits of downstreaming, championed by the previous administration and now perpetuated during the presidency of Prabowo Subianto, must end. The nickel industrialization drive has proven to be a tragic irony: instead of delivering a just energy transition, it is systematically destroying the environment, violating the rights of Indigenous Peoples and local communities, and deepening the damage to an Earth already buckling under the weight of the climate crisis.
Bangkok, 24 May 2025 — Ahead of the ASEAN Civil Society Conference/ASEAN Peoples’ Forum in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, taking place from 24–25 May 2025 under the theme “Inclusivity and Sustainability”, Greenpeace Thailand, Ecological Alert and Recovery – Thailand (EARTH), and regional civil society networks are calling on ASEAN leaders to collectively endorse a legally binding ASEAN Environmental Rights (AER) framework to address the region’s worsening transboundary pollution and environmental injustice.
Cases of transboundary pollution illustrate ASEAN’s failure to jointly address and act on the cross-border ecological and health crises. The current key threat in the Greater Mekong subregion, gold and rare earth mining operations in Shan State, Myanmar—only 20 kilometers from the Thai border and 2–3 kilometers from the Kok River are threatening ecosystems, public health, and local economies in Chiang Rai and Chiang Mai provinces. Toxic heavy metals discharged from mining activities are likely to accumulate in the environment and risk spreading downstream into the Mekong River Basin. This is not merely an environmental issue, but a serious violation of human rights, particularly those of ethnic minorities and vulnerable groups who deserve stronger protection.
Meanwhile, the recurring transboundary haze pollution from large-scale agro-industrial burning (e.g., corn, sugarcane, palm oil) in neighboring countries has become a chronic crisis, severely impacting provinces in Northern and Southern Thailand with dangerously high levels of PM2.5 air pollution, threatening public health and tourism.
Rattanasiri Kittikongnapang, Food and Forest Campaigner at Greenpeace Thailand stated: “ASEAN can no longer remain silent in the face of public outcry over transboundary pollution, whether it’s toxic haze drifting into our lungs or dangerous chemicals contaminating the Kok River from mining in neighboring states. We must acknowledge today that geographical borders cannot stop the spread of pollution into our air and water. ASEAN must advance the principle of ‘Polluter Pays’ that holds transnational corporations accountable for the environmental damage they cause across borders. This is a matter of justice and shared responsibility to protect our regional commons.”
Penchom Saetang, Director of the EARTH Foundation, added: “Southeast Asia is facing escalating environmental and health risks due to industrialisation, fossil fuel dependency, and mining. Without urgent action, these could spiral into irreversible disasters. For over 30 years, the United Nations has emphasized that sustainable development must be grounded in public participation, access to information, and environmental justice. ASEAN must evolve to promote transparency, resilience, and long-term regional stability, ensuring that all people have the right to live in a safe and healthy environment.”
Policy Recommendations to ASEAN Leaders:
Promote Sustainable and Responsible Business Practices
Establish cross-border corporate accountability frameworks that uphold human welfare and well-being. Enforce environmental and human rights obligations across all levels of the supply chain.
Strengthen Legal Accountability for Transboundary Pollution
Mandate Strategic Environmental Assessments (SEA) and legally binding Transboundary Environmental Impact Assessments (TEIA). Empower home states of parent companies to exercise extraterritorial jurisdiction over corporate misconduct.
Enhance Public Participation and Transparency
Advocate for an ASEAN Protocol on the Right to Know to guarantee public access to environmental information, participation, and justice. Establish a regional pollutant release and transfer register (ASEAN-PRTR) and promote human rights due diligence (HRDD) throughout supply chains.
Support Peace and Inclusive Coexistence for Equitable Society
Prioritize the rights of ethnic minorities, Indigenous peoples, and vulnerable communities. Recognise the critical role of local communities in safeguarding ecosystems and ensuring social cohesion.
Establish a Legally Binding ASEAN Environmental Rights (AER) Framework
Develop a legal instrument to address high-risk transboundary environmental threats, such as rare earth mining in Myanmar. Review ASEAN–China Environmental Cooperation Strategies to include robust mechanisms for joint environmental and human rights impact assessments.
International civil society groups are also calling on ASEAN leaders, particularly the Prime Minister of Malaysia as the 2025 ASEAN Chair to support the development of a legally binding ASEAN Environmental Rights framework encompassing corporate accountability, pollution liability, public participation, and the protection of Indigenous and local communities. It must also foster long-term ASEAN–China cooperation on sustainable environmental governance and human rights protection.
For more information, please contact: Somrudee Panasudtha, Senior Media Campaigner, Greenpeace Thailand Tel. 081 929 5747 Email: [email protected]
Jakarta, 12 June 2025 – A Greenpeace Indonesia investigation released today reveals the full scale of the threat nickel mining poses across Raja Ampat, Indonesia, an area referred to as ‘The Last Paradise on Earth’ and featuring in prominent lists of top travel destinations for 2025.[1]
A total of 16 nickel mining licences issued across the Raja Ampat archipelago, comprising 5 active licences and 11 previously issued but having been cancelled or expired.
Two previously cancelled/expired licences were re-issued in 2025.
Three other previously cancelled/expired licenses that are subject to company legal action to reactivate them.
A previously issued licence for nickel mining on Fam Islands, including the famous tourist destination Piaynemo/Jokowi steps.
Plans for nickel and steel smelters with links to nickel mining in Raja Ampat, to be built at Sorong. Sorong sits at the tip of New Guinea’s Bird’s Head Peninsula, itself a biodiversity hotspot, and the arrival point for tourists visiting Raja Ampat.[2]
Of the 16 nickel mining licences, 12 are located within the boundaries of the UNESCO-listed Raja Ampat Global Geopark, whilst 4 of the active licenses are on ‘small islands’ as designated by the Indonesian Government, which should mean that no mining can take place.
On 10th June the Indonesian Government announced it would revoke 4 active licences covering 3 of these small islands and one additional licence on Waigeo.[3] However, a number of cancelled licences have previously been reactivated in Raja Ampat.[4] Furthermore, the permit for the largest mine, operated by PT Gag Nikel, was not revoked.
Commenting on the investigation findings Kiki Taufik, head of Greenpeace’s global Indonesia forest campaign, said: “Raja Ampat is Indonesia’s last paradise. But instead of protecting it for Indigenous and local communities and the diving and tourism that have helped make this archipelago famous around the world, the government has left the door open to polluting nickel mining.
“Raja Ampat is incredible and unique, recognised as a Global Geopark by UNESCO and theoretically protected. The news this week that the Government will cancel four mining licenses is a step forward, but it’s not enough. The President must protect all of Raja Ampat and stop all plans for nickel mining and the plans for nickel and steel smelters in Sorong.“
Until this week two mines were commercially operating: PT Gag Nikel, a state owned mining company, and PT Kawei Sejahtera Mining. Both of these mines ship nickel ore to Indonesia Weda Bay Industrial Park for processing/smelting. PT Tsinghshan, a major shareholder in the industrial park that processes the ore from Raja Ampat, has established a joint venture company, Youshan Nickel Indonesia together with Huayou group. Youshan Nickel makes battery components for electric vehicles in Indonesia. PT Huayou supplies nickel to battery supply chains linked to a number of major EV makers including Toyota, Honda, Nissan, Hyundai, BMW, Mercedes, Tesla and BYD. It is therefore possible that any of these vehicle supply chains could be linked to nickel ore coming from Raja Ampat, though a lack of supply chain transparency makes this impossible to confirm at this time.
[2] Smelters for nickel and steel are planned for Sorong and the project was planned to break ground in 2024, although to date no work has started.
[3] The cancelled licenses are PT Kawei Sejahtera Mining (Pulau Kawe), PT Anugerah Surya Pratama (Pulau Manuran), PT Mulia Raymond Perkasa (Pulau Manyaifun and Batang Pele), dan PT Nurham (Pulau Waigeo).
[4] The two licences reactivated this year (PT MRP and PT Nurham) have both followed legal action by the companies to reactivate previously cancelled licences.
Contact
Igor O’Neill, Greenpeace Indonesia, [email protected] +61-414-288-424
Nice/Jakarta, June 11, 2025 – Greenpeace Indonesia welcomes the Indonesian government decision to ratify the Global Ocean Treaty, also known as Biodiversity Beyond National Jurisdiction (BBNJ). The decision was announced by Indonesian Minister of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries Sakti Wahyu Trenggono in Nice, France, on June 10, during the 3rd United Nations Ocean Conference (UNOC3) [1].
Moving forward, Greenpeace Indonesia urges the government to strengthen its leadership to increasingly mainstream a human rights-based approach in all protection and management efforts for the sustainable future of the ocean, both within and outside the national territory, in line win line with the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), including the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (KMGBF).
Greenpeace Indonesia also encourages the Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and other relevant institutions to be more proactive in ensuring Indonesia’s readiness for the implementation–especially once the Global Ocean Treaty will be in force within 120 days after at least 60 countries have ratified it.
Afdillah, Greenpeace Indonesia Ocean Campaign Team Lead:
“This is a momentum to ensure that the 5 Priority Blue Economy Programs initiated by the Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries are implemented effectively by ensuring meaningful multi-stakeholder participation, transparency, stronggenuine sustainability and fairness.”
Arifsyah Nasution, Greenpeace Southeast Asia Ocean Campaigner and Global Lead for Beyond Seafood Campaign:
“Congratulations to Indonesia for becoming the 50th country globally and the 4th in the Southeast Asia region, after Singapore, Timor Leste and Vietnam, to ratify the Global Ocean Treaty. We really look forward to welcoming more countries in Southeast Asia and the Asia-Pacific region to follow suit.”
“Aside from the BBNJ, a number of civil society elements and labor movements have also been urging the government to immediately ratify ILO Convention 188 on Work in Fishing [3]. Ratification of C-188 is urgent so that decent working conditions and the rights of Indonesian fishing crews, both those working on Indonesian-flagged fishing vessels and on foreign-flagged fishing vessels outside the Indonesian fisheries management area, can be increasingly protected. This is also a form of commitment and effort to implement effective and progressive policies, a real manifestation of Indonesia’s exemplary diplomacy in the international arena.”
Notes for Editors:
[1] Indonesia’s Declaration at UNOC3 on June 10, 2025, by the Minister of Marine Affairs and Fisheries
Contact Person:
Vela Andapita, Global Communications Coordinator for Beyond Seafood Campaign at Greenpeace Southeast Asia, +62-817-5759-449, [email protected]
Afdillah, Greenpeace Indonesia Ocean Campaign Team Lead, +62-811-4704-730, [email protected]
Arifsyah Nasution, Greenpeace Southeast Asia Ocean Campaigner and Global Lead for Beyond Seafood Campaign, +62-811-400-350, [email protected]
Bangkok, 6 June 2025 – Following the crude oil spill at SBM-2 (Single Buoy Mooring No. 2), operated by Thai Oil Public Company Limited, which occurred at approximately 11:54 p.m. on 5 June 2025 in the open sea off Si Racha, near its refinery in Chonburi Province [1], Greenpeace Thailand considers this incident yet another in a series of toxic leaks from the oil industry that have harmed Thailand’s seas, coastal communities, and marine ecosystems.
Greenpeace Thailand calls on Thai Oil Public Company Limited, the project owner, to take full responsibility for the spill by immediately implementing the following actions:
Thai Oil Public Company Limited must take full responsibility for all consequences arising from the incident, following the “Polluter Pays Principle”. This includes bearing the full cost of environmental restoration, compensation, and remediation for affected communities in a comprehensive and just manner. Responsibility must align with the 1992 International Convention on Civil Liability for Oil Pollution Damage (CLC 1992). Furthermore, the company must implement long-term rehabilitation plans for marine and coastal ecosystems, with clearly defined goals and an appropriate timeframe for restoration to their original state.
Thai Oil Public Company Limited must urgently develop a concrete and transparent remediation plan to compensate for the damage caused by this incident. The plan must comprehensively address the impacts on marine ecosystems, coastal communities, and public health. It should be carried out in collaboration with representatives from civil society, community members, government agencies, and academic experts to ensure that the damage assessment and compensation process is fair, inclusive, and accountable. Additionally, the company must continuously disclose information to the public throughout the entire process, in line with its Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) strategy framework.
Greenpeace Thailand urges the Thai government to take the following actions:
Establish an independent commission to investigate the oil spill disaster at SBM-2. The investigation must be transparent and inclusive, engaging civil society, academic experts, and independent organisations, to identify the causes and ensure accountability. The commission should also develop long-term solutions to prevent similar incidents in the future.
Strictly enforce environmental laws and conduct thorough inspections, ensuring that polluters, especially in cases involving hazardous substance spills into marine environments, face appropriate legal consequences. In addition, the government must implement continuous and systematic safety monitoring of oil transport and transfer operations to prevent future incidents.
Urgently review the national energy plan to reduce reliance on fossil fuels and establish a long-term goal to phase out oil and fossil gas. The government must actively support a transition to a clean, just, and renewable energy system that aligns with Thailand’s commitment to achieving Net-Zero Emissions. This includes halting all plans for the expansion and extraction of fossil fuels, especially in ecologically sensitive and biodiversity-rich areas.
Establish a Marine Environmental Disaster Relief Fund, firmly based on the “Polluter Pays Principle,” to ensure Thailand has a strong financial mechanism for rapid and effective response to environmental emergencies, including oil spills, chemical leaks, and hazardous waste incidents.
As global temperatures continue to rise and the climate crisis intensifies, continued reliance on and investment in fossil fuels not only accelerates environmental degradation, health impacts, and human rights violations but also shifts the burden of risk onto the public, especially vulnerable communities, while allowing industry actors to evade accountability.
To address this crisis, we must start by protecting fragile ecosystems—particularly biodiversity-rich marine environments—from high-risk industrial activities. The Thai government should establish new shipping routes for transporting hazardous materials, such as oil and liquefied fossil gas, that avoid marine conservation areas and vital fishing grounds. Strengthening protections for ecologically significant areas, both on land and at sea, must be treated as an urgent national priority. In the face of a rapidly escalating climate emergency, delay is no longer an option.
Greenpeace supports the public’s right to access clean, affordable, and equitable renewable energy, and advocates for meaningful public participation in both energy production and policy-making alongside the government.
The transition from fossil fuels to renewable energy is not just a choice—it is essential to slowing global warming and building a sustainable, just, and resilient response to the climate crisis.
New Delhi, 01 May 2025 – As a life-threatening heat wave unravels in South Asia, more than 10 groups representing at lakhs of workers across Indian, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal have signed a Polluters Pay Pact, calling on governments to introduce new taxes on oil, coal and gas corporations to fund solutions and help communities worldwide.
A Greenpeace India’s qualitative research report titled “Ground Zero: Climate Experiences among Informal Workers in Delhi,” released on this occasion found that street vendors suffer from immense productivity loss and health risks during peak summer months. The study noted that for every 1°C rise in temperature, informal workers’ earnings can fall by up to 19%, with income losses reaching up to 40% due to unbearable midday heat and reduced business. Simultaneously, medical expenses increase by around 14%—illustrating the devastating climate-health-economic nexus. The report mentions that street vendor’s daily earnings, once averaging Rs. 1000, now fluctuate between Rs 300-1200 due to climate disruption and market instability.
Workers across South Asia observed the International Workers’ Day, in a series of simultaneous events where they wrote messages about the impacts of extreme weather and their demands on sarees, a six-yard-long unstitched cloth draped by women in South Asia. The initiative, titled ‘Sarees for Solidarity’, carries messages of workers union leaders addressing the role of oil and gas corporations and their responsibility for the climate crisis which will be taken to the 30th United Nations Climate Change Conference of Parties (COP30), scheduled to be held in Balem, Brazil.
An event held today in New Delhi also marked the launch of the Workers’ Collective for Climate Justice – South Asia, which emerged as the key outcome of the discussions by worker groups and civil society organisations on growing threats to workers from extreme weather events, fuelled by the oil and gas industry. Participants included the Youth Organization for Democratic Development and Help in Action (YODDHA) and Joint Hawker Action Committee for street vendors, the Basti Suraksha Manch union for waste pickers, the Telengana Gig and Platform Workers Union, Amazon Workers’ Union, domestic workers, construction workers and indoor-based factory workers.
“As temperatures rise, we must do the same. City infrastructure needs to match the adaptation needs of everyone. Vendors, who work outside through the heatwave, are in urgent need of cooling centers, shaded areas, water, and medical care to survive this heatwave season,” said Sandeep Verma of the Youth Organisation for Democratic and Help in Action (YODDHA). “In the scorching heat, Indian workers have nowhere to hide, while the oil executives fueling this crisis are safely seated in air conditioned offices. This injustice must end by applying the polluter pays principle to those responsible for the climate crisis we’re in.”
“When the heat rises, it’s not the CEOs of oil and gas companies who suffer—it’s the informal workers out on the streets, with little infrastructure and safety net for adaptation. Our Ground Zero report shows just how devastating this is: income drops, health risks soar, and yet no one’s held accountable. That’s why we’re backing the Polluters Pay Pact, said Amruta S. Nair, Climate and Energy campaigner at Greenpeace India. “Governments must impose taxes on Big Oil, the proceeds of which should be redirected for inclusive adaptation measures for vulnerable communities. Climate justice must begin by protecting those who are least responsible for this crisis, but who pay the heaviest price every day.”
”As momentum builds up to make oil and gas corporations pay for a crisis fuelled by their emissions, the industry responds with attacks against those calling them out. Emblematic of this assault on free speech is a multi-millions US$ meritless lawsuit by U.S. company Energy Transfer against Greenpeace U.S. and Greenpeace International. The Polluters Pay Pact shows that while polluters engage in intimidation, the climate movement can’t be silenced. Greenpeace organisations worldwide are committed as ever to resist the corporate polluters and the billionaire takeover of democracy.
Bengaluru, India. 9th March 2025 – A month after the metro hike on 9th February, commuters and citizens in Bengaluru came together, inside the city’s metro today, calling for an immediate rollback of the recent fare hike. The demonstration highlighted growing public concern over affordable and accessible public transport, urging authorities to take action. Bengaluru Metro ridership dropped 13% overall post fare hike, with a sharp 20% drop in February alone, signalling affordability concerns.
A recent survey conducted by Greenpeace India after the metro fare hike in February 2025, highlights that Bengaluru Metro fare hike has significantly burdened low and middle income groups, students and working professionals as 72.9% of respondents said that their transport costs now exceeds or equal their one-time meal expense. Additionally, women, who depend on public transport more than men, have been disproportionately affected, further limiting their mobility and safety. The fare hike makes daily travel a financial burden for students and working professionals who rely on public transport.
Key finding of the survey:
40.4% of respondents use the metro as their primary mode of transport.
62.9% rely on Public transport (metro & buses combined)
73.4% spent 50-150 Rs daily on transport.
68% of respondents stated that the fare hike made metro travel expensive.
75.4% cut down on non-essential travel due to rising costs.
38.2% women have reduced their non essential travel due to metro fare hike in Bangalore
A majority believe the fare hike is unjust and harms urban mobility.
Many commuters demand a rollback of the fare hike to restore affordability.
Greenpeace India urged BMRCL to roll back the Namma Metro fare hike in a letter and called on the government to prioritize affordable, gender-sensitive and disability-friendly public transport over shifting costs onto commuters. The fare hike has led to several changes in the lives of people, with parents looking to shift schools and people across income groups shifting to other modes of transport.
Bengaluru, already battling severe climate impacts like air pollution and heat waves and is vulnerable to high degree of climate change, needs greater investment in efficient public transit to tackle congestion and build climate resilience. Instead of fare hikes, measures like congestion charges and stricter parking policies can help generate revenue while curbing excessive car use. The car centric infrastructure such as the proposed ₹19,000 crore tunnel project will only offer a temporary fix and divert critical funds from sustainable transport solutions.
Aakiz Farooq, Campaigner, Greenpeace India: “Public transport should serve the people, not profit-driven motives. Bengaluru’s metro fare hike further burdens commuters already struggling with affordability and accessibility. With our cities facing severe environmental crises, investing in affordable and efficient mass transit is essential. There is a need for a dedicated public transport budget and both state and central governments must step up to strengthen the mass transit system. The Government should introduce Climate Tickets to incentivise public transport for commuters ”
Individuals with bold protest messages – Un-Fare Hike, Unfair Cities, gathered at Kengeri metro station in the morning, where they boarded a metro train bound for MG Road while carrying placards and banners advocating for fair fares. Their silent yetpowerful visual demonstration represented the burden that fare hikes place on ordinary citizens, amplifying the public outcry and reinforcing the need for affordable, accessible, and sustainable urban mobility.
With each fare increase, Bengaluru’s metro—once envisioned as an affordable and inclusive public service—has become a system of exclusion, disproportionately affecting students, IT workers, informal workers, women, and lower-income groups, office-goers among others. Many commuters are now forced to switch to costlier, more polluting alternatives, increasing road congestion and air pollution. Vehicular pollution ranks as the second largest and a highly consistent source of PM10 and PM2.5 particulate matter. This pollution poses a serious threat to citizen health and is a key driver of climate change.
Irene Ann Kuttichira, Metro Commuter “As a daily commuter, I feel every fare hike hits hard. Many depend on the metro for work or college, and higher fares make commuting unaffordable and leave us with tough choices. We are demanding a transport system that serves everyone—not just those who can afford to pay more.”
About Greenpeace India
Greenpeace India is an independent environmental organization that campaigns for sustainable and equitable solutions to climate change, air pollution, and urban mobility issues. Through grassroots activism and policy advocacy, Greenpeace India seeks to make cities more liveable, breathable, and accessible for all.
New Delhi, February 18, 2025: In response to the sixteenth Finance Commission, headed by Arvind Panagariya, inviting public suggestions on its mandate set for it by the Central Government, a coalition of 12 citizen groups, led by Greenpeace India, has urged the commission to prioritize climate adaptation in India’s financial policies, focusing on climate impacted communities. The commission, constituted in December of last year, is expected to submit its recommendations by October 2025, which will be valid for five years starting April 1, 2026. These recommendations from the coalition, agreed upon through multiple stakeholder consultations, represent a comprehensive civil society input at this crucial time.
The groups sounded an urgent alarm about the escalating climate crisis, revealing that extreme weather events claimed 3,238 lives in the first nine months of 2024 alone—an alarming 18% increase compared to 2022. Data from previous years (2015–2022) also highlights a consistent rise in climate-related human and economic losses, reinforcing the urgent need for climate adaptation. Heat-related productivity losses alone could slash India’s GDP by up to 4.5% by 2030, while inadequate adaptation measures over the years have compounded economic vulnerability.
Beyond the direct loss of lives and economic damage, the crisis has also led to missed opportunities for climate-sensitive communities. Many who depend on agriculture, fisheries, and informal labor could have experienced greater economic security and resilience if proactive adaptation investments had been made earlier. The lack of preparedness has not only intensified the immediate impact of extreme weather events but has also limited the long-term livelihood potential of millions, highlighting the need for urgent, forward-looking climate action.
Ahead of the union budget, India’s Economic Survey(IES) for 2024-25 points out a growing problem: we’re not spending enough to adapt to climate change. Although spending on adaptation has increased from 3.7% of our GDP in the 2015-16 financial year to 5.6% in 2021-22, it’s still not enough. India is the seventh most vulnerable country to the effects of climate change, this poses a significant risk.The survey emphasized that effective adaptation strategies require a multi-faceted approach, including policy initiatives, sector-specific strategies, resilient infrastructure, research and development, and securing financial resources. These measures should also be tailored to India’s diverse geographic and agro-climatic conditions.
“Despite the IES recommendation, the 2025 Budget doesn’t include specific funding for adaptation. While we appreciate the focus on reducing emissions (mitigation),the urgency of need for climate adaptation cannot be ignored. This lack of budgetary support for adaptation puts climate impacted communities at a much higher risk, threatening lives, livelihoods, and the economy”, says Selomi Garnaik, Climate Justice Campaigner, Greenpeace India, who led the stakeholder consultations.
The 16th Finance Commission must urge the National Disaster Management Authority (NDMA) to officially recognize heatwaves as a national disaster.
Establish a Dedicated Climate Adaptation and Resilience Fund for Marginalized and Vulnerable Communities:
Devolve funds to state governments for managing extreme weather events, with allocations based on updated epistemological evidence such as the Climate Vulnerability Mapping Atlas.
Recommend the Center to create provision for Climate Damage Tax (CDT),in order to hold the big polluters accountable.
India should adopt a national framework aligned with loss and damage principle and provide Adequate compensation for losses and damages due to climate change should be provided to impacted states, with special focus on marginalized and impacted communities.
A Call for Climate Justice
The coalition emphasized that these recommendations are not just policy changes but steps toward achieving climate justice for the most vulnerable populations. They urged the Finance Commission to take immediate action to build a sustainable and equitable future.
The recommendations letter is prepared by diverse coalition of 12 citizen groups, led by Greenpeace including Poovulagin Nanbargal, RIGHTS, Basti Suraksha Manch, VAN Gujjar Tribal Yuva Sangathan Uttarakhand, Justice in Mining Network, Mukti, Youth For Climate India, Heatwave Action Coalition India, Janpahal, HeatWatch, People for Himalayan Development, and Telangana Gig and Platform Workers Union. Together, they represent a wide range of stakeholders committed to advancing climate resilience and justice.
Greenpeace India along with the Public Transport Forum today launched a Citizen’s Draft Policy for Affordable Public Transport in India. This draft policy, developed through extensive consultations with experts and citizens, aims to transform urban mobility in India. Recognizing the critical role of public transport in the lives of millions of Indians, the draft policy emphasizes the urgent need to overhaul the current system, which is plagued by underfunding and inefficient prioritization of private vehicles.
The draft policy outlines a comprehensive vision for a more just, sustainable, and equitable public transport system. Key policy recommendations include the introduction of “Climate Tickets,” encompassing fare-free and subsidized public transport options, to make public transport more affordable and accessible for all citizens. The policy also calls for a significant increase in central government funding specifically allocated to improving public transport infrastructure and services.
The draft policy outlines a comprehensive approach to public transport, focusing on fairness, environmental responsibility, and operational efficiency. Built on citizen recommendations, this policy aims to transform the public transport system into one that is inclusive, sustainable, and efficient for all Indians.
“This union budget can be an opportunity for the central government to exhibit their commitment towards achieving India’s climate goals by investing more into making public transport accessible, affordable and efficient in India. The policy draft provides a roadmap for creating a more sustainable, equitable, and efficient and more importantly affordable public transportation system for India. For an environmentally friendly, cleaner and sustainable India, the central government needs to adopt policy and financial measures which will make public transport efficient and affordable in India.” – Aakiz Farooq, Campaigner at Greenpeace India
Further speaking Aakiz Farooq elaborates “For a country like ours which has immense potential for sustainable growth we need equity in access to opportunities for jobs, healthcare, leisure etc and an accessible public transport for all is a key component of this. This is not about distributing free tickets but about the state’s responsibility towards citizens- especially groups like women, elderly, children who are key to any nation building exercise”.
The draft policy outlines the challenges faced by current public transport systems in India. These include an overemphasis on road infrastructure, with excessive resources directed towards road expansion, flyovers, and tunnels, while public transport infrastructure remains neglected. Additionally, public bus services are inadequate, with insufficient bus fleets, high fares, safety concerns, and limited accessibility for marginalized groups. Furthermore, there is a lack of dedicated funding for public transport, with operations and maintenance often underfunded.
As part of the citizen draft policy for affordable public transport in India, Greenpeace India along with Public Transport Forum propose these solutions:
Universal Fare-Free Public Transport: The policy proposes a phased implementation of fare-free public transport through “Climate Tickets” for women, children, elderly, transgender people, and persons with disabilities, eventually extending to all citizens.
Resource Reallocation: Shift investments from road, metro, and fossil fuel subsidies to expanding and improving public transport systems.
Improving Infrastructure and Services: Double bus fleets in cities, create dedicated bus lanes, modernize bus depots, improve bus stops with accessible amenities, and enhance first/last-mile connectivity.
Protecting Workers’ Rights: Ensure fair wages, safe working conditions, and gender inclusivity in the workforce. Recognize public transport jobs as green jobs, fostering workforce participation in decision-making.
State-Level Public Transport Fund: Create dedicated funding mechanisms through central, state, and municipal contributions. Abolish taxes on public transport to reduce operational costs and reinvest savings into service improvements.
Climate Funding Integration: Position public transport as a key climate action tool, leveraging domestic and international climate finance to enhance affordability, operational efficiency, and emission reductions.
Citizen Participation and Multi-Tier Governance: Advocate for coordinated efforts between central, state, and local governments, with State Planning Boards managing implementation. Establish citizen user unions and conduct annual reviews for inclusive policymaking.
Public Awareness Campaigns: Address stigma around free public transport, particularly for women, and promote the right to affordable, accessible, and reliable mobility through education and advocacy initiatives.
“Free public transport has recently become a key focus in elections and political discussions, with many states considering ways to introduce such schemes. However, there is currently no clear policy to guide these efforts. Our draft policy is designed to serve as a flexible framework that Governments can adapt to their needs while ensuring a consistent approach across the country. It also highlights how the central government can support this shift, making public transport accessible, safe, and reliable for everyone.” explains Nishant, coordinator of the Public Transport Forum.
About Greenpeace India: Greenpeace is an independent global campaigning network that acts to change attitudes and behaviour, to protect and conserve the environment and to promote peace. It comprises 26 independent national/regional Greenpeace organisations with presence in over 55 countries across Africa, the Americas, Asia, Europe and the Pacific, as well as a coordinating and supporting organisation, Greenpeace International.
About Public Transport Forum
The Public Transport Forum is a collective of civil society organizations, transport experts, and citizen advocates working towards ensuring that public transport in India is accessible, affordable, and sustainable. The forum strives for comprehensive policy reforms and greater public participation in transport planning.
Bengaluru, India –December 4, 2024: A latest report by Greenpeace India, “Beyond North India: NO₂ Pollution and Health Risks in Seven Major Indian Cities”, reveals alarming levels of nitrogen dioxide (NO₂) pollution in Bengaluru.
Nitrogen dioxide (NO₂) is a near-invisible toxic gas closely linked to traffic and fuel burning, common in urban areas. That means vehicles and energy generation from fossil fuel are important sources of NO₂.
The WHO recommends an annual NO2 concentration of no more than 10 µg/m³, while the NAAQS limit is 40 µg/m³. In 2023, Bengaluru’s 13 Continuous Ambient Air Quality Monitoring (CAAQM) stations recorded varying levels of air quality. The highest NO2 levels were measured at City Railway Station, which exceeded WHO guidelines for over 80% of the year. Additionally, BTM Layout and Silk Road air quality monitoring stations were among the city’s most polluted. Exposure to NO2 poses a serious health risk to residents, especially with such frequently high concentrations in public spaces.
Annual average NO2concentrations for all CAAQM monitors in Bengaluru, 2023. Monitoring stations we classified as roadside are shown in dark blue (Column values are rounded).
Overwhelming scientific evidence links NO₂ exposure to adverse health impacts such as risk of asthma, airway inflammation, respiratory irritation, and the worsening of existing respiratory conditions. It can impair lung development, intensify allergies and increase susceptibility to respiratory mortality and death from circulatory diseases, ischemic heart disease, and even lung cancer. The report highlights that NO₂ pollution in 2019 could have been responsible for as many as 2,730 cases of paediatric asthma in Bengaluru.
“This report underscores a crucial truth: air pollution is not limited to Delhi or North India. The transportation sector is the largest contributor to high NO₂ levels across cities in India. As cities grow, the rise in private vehicles worsens air quality and jeopardizes public health. To tackle this, we need a fundamental shift towards a sustainable, efficient public transportation system. Investing in cleaner, more accessible transport options is not just an environmental necessity—it’s an urgent public health imperative. The government must prioritize cleaner mobility solutions to ensure a healthier future, said Selomi Garniak, Climate Justice Campaigner at Greenpeace India.
India’s response to the air pollution crisis, particularly NO2 pollution, falls woefully short of global health standards. India’s Air pollution Standards (NAAQS) are far less stringent than WHO guidelines. Despite significant advancements in understanding the health risks posed by air pollution, especially at low exposure levels, India has not updated its NAAQS since 15 years . This outdated regulatory framework fails to protect public health adequately, leaving millions vulnerable to the severe consequences of air pollution.
Air pollution is a growing public health threat in India, requiring bold, innovative solutions. One such solution is an affordable ‘Clean Air Concession’ for public transportation. By making mass transit more accessible, this policy can encourage people to leave their cars behind, reducing congestion and harmful emissions. This simple measure can significantly improve air quality, public health, and create more inclusive, healthier cities. said Aakiz Farooq, Mobility Campaigner at Greenpeace India.
Poor air quality in major Indian cities is a serious public health concern. To address this, Greenpeace India recommends a region-specific approach for cities like Bengaluru, Hyderabad, Chennai, Mumbai, Kolkata, and Pune. In addition to revising NAAQS, the focus should be on strengthening healthcare services to diagnose air pollution-related conditions and implementing a comprehensive health advisory system with public education and timely alerts during high pollution periods. Vulnerable groups, including children, the elderly, pregnant women, outdoor workers, and those with pre-existing conditions, should receive prioritized health interventions.
Local governments should focus on reducing vehicular emissions by enhancing public transport, including fare-free schemes for women. Increased investment is needed in hybrid air quality monitoring networks that combine low-cost sensors, existing systems, and satellite data. This data-driven approach will help track progress and guide effective interventions to reduce pollution levels.
For More details please contact- Selomi Garnaik- Greenpeace Campaigner Contact – ph- +91-9691330473 Mail- [email protected]
Annexure 1
Key Highlights
In 2023, annual NO₂ concentrations exceeded the WHO health-based guideline at all 13 government monitored Continuous Ambient Air Quality Monitoring stations (CAAQM) .
The highest concentrations were recorded at the City Railway Station monitoring station.
Monitoring stations that exceeded the WHO health guidelines in 2023 were located near five schools.
In 2023, daily average NO₂ concentrations were higher than the WHO daily guideline at the City Railway Station for 80% of days in the year.
Over the last five years, trends in NO₂ concentrations from ground-level monitors show no significant improvement in air quality. In fact, satellite observations suggest that pollution across the city is worsening.
Road transport is the second-largest source of NOx emissions in Bengaluru, accounting for 20% of emissions in the EDGAR emission inventory.
Annexure 2-
About Greenpeace
Greenpeace India is a part of the global environmental organisation, dedicated to tackling pressing environmental challenges through advocacy, campaigns, and public engagement. Greenpeace India’s Climate Justice Campaign advocates for accountability, equitable policy changes, and climate finance to address the rising climate impacts felt by communities in South Asia.
Nice, France – Over 90 member states at the United Nations Ocean Conference today announced their support to the ministerial declaration “The Nice wake up call for an ambitious plastics treaty” which includes a call for the adoption of a global target to reduce the production and consumption of plastic.
In response, Graham Forbes, Greenpeace Head of Delegation to the Global Plastics Treaty negotiations and Global Plastics Campaign Lead at Greenpeace USA, said: “The Nice Declaration, signed by an overwhelming majority of countries, is the wake-up call the world needs. Governments are finally saying the quiet part out loud: we cannot end plastic pollution without cutting plastic production. Full stop.
“The Nice Declaration tackles the root cause of the crisis, which is the ever-growing, reckless production of plastics driven by fossil fuel giants. The message to industry lobbyists is loud and clear: the health of our children is more important than your bottom line.”
“We welcome the call for a legally binding global cap on plastic production, and real rules to phase out the most toxic plastic products and chemicals. For too long, treaty talks have been stuck in circular conversations while plastic pollution chokes our oceans, poisons our bodies, and fuels the climate crisis.
“But this statement only matters if countries back it up with action this August in Geneva at INC-5.2. That means no voluntary nonsense, no loopholes, and no surrender to fossil fuel and petrochemical interests. We need a treaty with teeth—one that slashes plastic production, holds polluters accountable, and protects people on the frontlines.”
ENDS
Notes:
A statement, signed by 234 civil society organisations, was also released in support of the Nice declaration.
Contact:
Angelica Carballo Pago, Global Plastics Campaign Media Lead, Greenpeace USA, [email protected] , +63 917 1124492
