Category: Europe

  • MIL-OSI USA: Disaster Recovery Center in Richmond County to Permanently Close Feb. 28

    Source: US Federal Emergency Management Agency 2

    Disaster Recovery Center in Richmond County to Permanently Close Feb. 28

    The Disaster Recovery Center in Richmond County is set to permanently close at 5:30 p.m., Friday, Feb. 28. It is currently open 9 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., Monday through Friday.The recovery center is at this location:Diamond Lakes Branch Library101 Diamond Lakes WayHephzibah, GA 30904There are additional ways to check the status of your application or update your contact information:Online at DisasterAssistance.gov.The FEMA App for mobile devicesCall the FEMA Helpline at 800-621-3362. Survivors can also contact the Georgia Call Center Monday through Saturday at 678-547-2861 for assistance with their application.FEMA Staff will also be available at these Small Business Administration locations:Bulloch County Statesboro-Bulloch County Library124 S. Main St.Statesboro, GA 30458Hours: 9 a.m. to 6 p.m. Monday–Friday; 9 a.m. to 4 p.m. Saturday; closed Sunday.Coffee CountySatilla Regional Library200 S Madison AveDouglas, GA 31533Hours: 10 a.m. to 6 p.m. Monday-Thursday; 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. Friday; 10 a.m. to 2 p.m. Saturday; closed Sunday.Lowndes County  Lowndes County Civic Center Bldg. D 2102 E. Hill Ave. Valdosta, GA 30601 Hours: 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. Monday-Saturday; closed Sunday.Jeff Davis CountyJeff Davis County Recreation Department83 Buford RoadHazlehurst, GA 31539Hours: 9 a.m. to 6 p.m. Monday–Friday; 9 a.m. to 4 p.m. Saturday; closed Sunday.Telfair CountyTelfair Community Service Center91 Telfair Ave # DMcRae-Helena, GA 31055Hours: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. Monday – Friday, Closed Saturdays and SundaysFEMA provides help to all disaster survivors, regardless of race, color, national origin, sex, sexual orientation,  religion, age, disability, English proficiency or economic status. Our top priority is ensuring that disaster assistance is reaching people in need.
    jakia.randolph
    Thu, 02/27/2025 – 13:14

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: MEDIA ADVISORY: House Foreign Affairs Subcommittee on Europe Hearing

    Source: US House Committee on Foreign Affairs

    Media Contact 202-321-9747

    WASHINGTON, D.C. – The House Foreign Affairs Subcommittee on Europe will hold a public hearing titled “Bridging the Gap: Turkey Between East and West” on Wednesday, March 5, 2025.

    What: House Foreign Affairs Subcommittee on Europe Hearing

    Date: Wednesday, March 5, 2025

    Time: 2:00 p.m. ET

    Location: 2172 Rayburn

    Subject: Bridging the Gap: Turkey Between East and West

    Witnesses:

    Dr. Anna Borschevskaya

    Harold Grinspoon Senior Fellow

    Washington Institute for Near East Policy

    Dr. Jonathan Schanzer

    Executive Director

    Foundation for Defense of Democracies

    The Honorable Celeste Wallander

    Adjunct Senior Fellow

    Center for a New American Security

    ***Check here for updates. The hearing will be webcast live here and open to the public and press. Members of the media who would like to attend in-person should RSVP with Joe Clark at joseph.clark@mail.house.gov by 5 p.m. Tuesday, March 4, 2025. ***

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Telephone conversation with President El-Sisi of Egypt

    Source: Government of Italy (English)

    27 Febbraio 2025

    The President of the Council of Ministers, Giorgia Meloni, had a telephone conversation today with the President of Egypt, Abdel Fattah El-Sisi.

    The call provided an opportunity to review the main areas of bilateral cooperation, starting with the initiatives launched by Italy in the sectors of education, vocational training, renewable energy and sustainable agriculture within the framework of the Mattei Plan for Africa, as well as cooperation on the issue of migration in line with the memorandum of understanding between the EU and Egypt.

    The two leaders also discussed the situation in the Middle East, agreeing on the need to keep working for the stabilisation and reconstruction of Gaza with the aim of reviving a political dialogue for a just and lasting peace in the region

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Murkowski Cosponsors Bill to Grant Ukrainians Already in the U.S. Temporary Guest Status

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Alaska Lisa Murkowski
    02.27.25
    Washington, DC – Following the third anniversary of Russia’s catastrophic invasion of Ukraine, U.S. Senator Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) announced that she has joined U.S. Senate Democratic Whip Dick Durbin (D-IL) as a cosponsor of his Protecting Our Guests During Hostilities in Ukraine Act, which would provide temporary guest status to Ukrainians and their immediate family members who are already in the United States through the “Uniting for Ukraine” parole process. The bill allows Ukrainians to stay and work in the U.S. until the Secretary of State determines that hostilities in Ukraine have ceased and it is safe for them to return. In addition to Murkowski, U.S. Senators Tammy Duckworth (D-IL), Richard Blumenthal (D-CT), Jacky Rosen (D-NV), Chris Van Hollen (D-MD), Peter Welch (D-VT), Amy Klobuchar (D-MN), Michael Bennet (D-CO), Alex Padilla (D-CA), and Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) are cosponsors of the legislation.
    “I have had the opportunity to visit with many Ukrainians who fled Russia’s unprovoked war who have found safety and community in Alaska. These families—and the Alaskans and Alaskan businesses who have supported and employed them—have expressed their strong desire to remain and work here,” said Murkowski. “Granting temporary guest status for Ukrainians already in the United States achieves this goal. As the war enters its fourth year, we must continue to provide the Ukrainians who have taken refuge in the U.S. a safe haven to weather the storm.”
    “Three years ago, Putin began his brutal, criminal, full-scale invasion of Ukraine—which remains on the frontlines of democracy and transatlantic security,” said Durbin. “When the war started, Americans across the country opened their hearts and communities to Ukrainians fleeing Russian aggression. Both Republicans and Democrats petitioned President Biden to protect them from deportation. I’m glad Senator Murkowski joined my legislation to ensure Ukrainians lawfully present in the U.S. have temporary guest status until conditions in Ukraine are safe for return. I hope others will follow her lead.”
    The individuals covered by the bill already underwent rigorous vetting to ensure that they present no criminal or public safety risks. The legislation would also allow the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to revoke this temporary status if new information raises such concerns about any individual. Bill text can be found here. 
    The following organizations endorsed the Protecting Our Guests During Hostilities in Ukraine Act: Refugee Council USA; Chin Association of Maryland; HIAS; World Relief; Center for Gender & Refugee Studies; Human Rights First; Church World Service; International Refugee Assistance Project; Global Refuge; Boat People SOS; Center for Victims of Torture; Jesuit Refugee Service; and Veterans for American Ideals.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Security: Defense News: Fleet Ballistic Missile Submarines – SSBN

    Source: United States Navy

    Features

    The Navy’s ballistic missile submarines, often referred to as “boomers,” serve as an undetectable launch platform for submarine-launched ballistic missiles (SLBMs). They are designed specifically for stealth and the precise delivery of nuclear warheads.

    Ohio Class

    Each of the 14 Ohio-class SSBNs originally carried up to 24 SLBMs with multiple, independently targeted warheads. However, under provisions of the New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty, each submarine has had four of its missile tubes permanently deactivated and now carry a maximum of 20 missiles. The SSBN’s strategic weapon is the Trident II D5 missile, which provides increased range and accuracy over the now out-of-service Trident I C4 missile.

    SSBNs are specifically designed for extended deterrent patrols. To decrease the amount of time required for replenishment and maintenance, Ohio-class submarines have three large-diameter logistics hatches that allow sailors to rapidly transfer supply pallets, equipment replacement modules and machinery components, thereby increasing their operational availability.

    The Ohio-class design allows the submarines to operate for 15 or more years between major overhauls. On average, the submarines spend 77 days at sea followed by 35 days in-port for maintenance. Each SSBN has two crews, Blue and Gold, which alternate manning the submarines and taking them on patrol. This maximizes the SSBN’s strategic availability, reduces the number of submarines required to meet strategic requirements, and allows for proper crew training, readiness and morale.

    Columbia Class

    The Columbia-class SSBN is the nation’s future Sea Based Strategic Deterrent, is the Navy’s number one acquisition priority, and will provide the most survivable leg of the Nation’s strategic triad. It replaces the currently serving Ohio-class SSBNs and must be ready for patrol no later than October 2030 to meet United States Strategic Command requirements.

    Representing a generational recapitalization of the SSBN force, Columbia-class will ensure continuous sea-based strategic deterrence into the 2080s. The Columbia-class will be the largest, most capable and most advanced submarine produced by our nation.

    General Characteristics, Ohio Class Ballistic Missile Submarines – SSBN

    Builder: General Dynamics Electric Boat Division

    Propulsion: One nuclear reactor, one shaft

    Length: 560 feet (170.69 meters)

    Beam: 42 feet (12.8 meters)

    Displacement: 16,764 tons (17,033.03 metric tons) surfaced; 18,750 tons (19,000.1 metric tons) submerged

    Speed: 20+ knots (23+ miles per hour, 36.8+ kph)

    Crew: 15 Officers, 144 Enlisted

    Armament: Trident II D5 (LE), 20 missile tubes, Mk48 torpedoes 

    Ships:
    USS Henry M. Jackson (SSBN 730) Bangor, Washington
    USS Alabama (SSBN 731) Bangor, Washington
    USS Alaska (SSBN 732) Kings Bay, Georgia
    USS Nevada (SSBN 733) Bangor, Washington
    USS Tennessee (SSBN 734) Kings Bay, Georgia
    USS Pennsylvania (SSBN 735) Bangor, Washington
    USS West Virginia (SSBN 736) Kings Bay, Georgia
    USS Kentucky (SSBN 737) Bangor, Washington
    USS Maryland (SSBN 738) Kings Bay, Georgia
    USS Nebraska (SSBN 739) Bangor, Washington
    USS Rhode Island (SSBN 740) Kings Bay, Georgia
    USS Maine (SSBN 741) Bangor, Washington
    USS Wyoming (SSBN 742) Kings Bay, Georgia
    USS Louisiana (SSBN 743) Bangor, WashingtonPoint of Contact
    Naval Sea Systems Command
    Office of Corporate Communications (SEA 00D

    General Characteristics, Columbia Class

    Lead Design Shipbuilder: General Dynamics – Electric Boat

    Propulsion: Electric-drive propulsion system

    Length: 560 feet

    Beam: 43 feet

    Displacement: 20,800 long tons

    Speed: 20+ knots (23+ mph)

    Crew: 15 Officers, 140 Enlisted

    Armament: Trident II D5 (LE), 16 missile tubes, MK48 torpedoes

    Ships:

    District of Columbia (SSBN 826) – Under construction

    Wisconsin (SSN 827) – Under construction

    Groton (SSBN 828)

    Point of Contact
    Naval Sea Systems Command
    Office of Corporate Communications

    Washington, D.C. 20376

    (202) 781-4123Washington, D.C. 20376

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Emergence and monitoring of DeepSeek – E-000712/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-000712/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Nadine Morano (PPE)

    DeepSeek, the new artificial intelligence platform developed by a Chinese start-up, has been in the headlines for several weeks.

    It appears to have been programmed to meet censorship criteria set by the Chinese administration, but it also seems to send its users’ data to China Mobile, a company that has close ties with the Chinese army and is subject to US sanctions. Italy has even banned DeepSeek.

    Against this backdrop:

    How will the Commission keep a watching brief on DeepSeek and ensure that EU citizens can use it free of risk?

    Submitted: 17.2.2025

    Last updated: 27 February 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Simplifying REACH – E-000689/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-000689/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Massimiliano Salini (PPE)

    According to the Competitiveness Compass, one of the flagship actions that the Commission will present in 2025 is the ‘chemicals industry package’, a key component of which is the simplification of the REACH regulation. This measure is designed to secure the competitiveness of the chemicals industry, as well as to safeguard human and environmental health.

    Given the vital significance of the package, it is essential that the Commission involve stakeholders, analyse the information gathered, carry out fitness checks, perform stress tests and prepare thorough impact assessments before revealing new initiatives, in line with the Better Regulation Guidelines. More specifically, the aim should be to reduce regulatory complexity and cut red tape, particularly for SMEs, while maintaining high safety and environmental protection standards.

    As part of the Competitiveness Compass, the Commission has announced a new SME and competitiveness check to act as a stronger filter for new initiatives.

    In light of the above:

    • 1.When drawing up and implementing the legislative proposal on simplifying REACH, will the Commission see to it that the Better Regulation Guidelines, including the new SME and competitiveness check, are applied in full?
    • 2.In particular, can it provide assurances that the initiative will involve extensive consultations with stakeholders, rigorous analyses and robust impact assessments, in line with the requirements laid down in the guidelines?

    Submitted: 13.2.2025

    Last updated: 27 February 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Ensuring impartiality and conflict of interest prevention in Commission-hired consultancies – E-000695/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-000695/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Tomáš Zdechovský (PPE)

    The Commission and its agencies increasingly award public tenders to consultancies tasked with providing independent assessments of policy areas. While participants must sign general and specific declarations of honour and submit staff CVs, this does not prevent cases where a consultancy holds a clear position on a certain policy option but leaves out counter-evidence, thus undermining the neutrality of the outcome.

    Several such instances have arisen in recent years, for example in relation to a study on EU merger decisions[1], to a study on environmental, social and governance (ESG) objectives[2] and to services to support the implementation and further development of a tobacco control policy[3].

    Given these concerns:

    • 1.How does the Commission ensure that consultants hired for external support are free from conflicts of interest and provide unbiased analysis?
    • 2.Beyond the declarations of honour and the assessment of CVs of staff members, what measures does the Commission implement to exclude consultants with vested interests at an early stage?
    • 3.Does the Commission plan to introduce additional safeguards to prevent such situations and conflicts in the future?

    Submitted: 14.2.2025

    • [1] https://globalcompetitionreview.com/article/rbb-economics-loses-eu-merger-review-contract-over-perceived-biases.
    • [2] https://reclaimfinance.org/site/en/2021/06/30/blackrocks-lobbying-machine-vs-eu-green-finance-rules/.
    • [3] https://www.euractiv.com/section/politics/news/stakeholders-bicker-over-eu-tender-on-tobacco-control-policy/.
    Last updated: 27 February 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – EFSA citing a non-independent expert on genetically engineered animals – E-000633/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-000633/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Anja Hazekamp (The Left)

    The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) recently opened a public consultation on new genomic techniques (NGTs) applied to animals. To prepare its draft opinion, EFSA commissioned a report by Alison Van Eenennaam. This report by Van Eenennaam is mentioned 17 times in EFSA’s draft opinion. However, Van Eenennaam’s capacity to act independently and in the public interest is questionable.

    Van Eenennaam filed patents on transgenic plants with Monsanto. Later, her interest shifted to genetically engineered animals. She is named as an inventor on several patent applications on NGT animals, including WO2023196818 and WO2023235879. She therefore has commercial interests in this topic.

    She was also involved in public relations for the well-known case of NGT hornless cattle, where unintentionally, complete DNA fragments from bacteria were inserted that would have been able to confer resistance to antibiotics. This case evidences the need to take into account the unintended effects caused by NGT processes. However, this finding was not mentioned in the Van Eenennaam report.

    • 1.Does the Commission consider Van Eenennaam to be an independent expert who may contribute to EFSA’s opinions on the topic of NGT animals?
    • 2.Given these conflicts of interest, can the commissioned report still feature in EFSA’s work, or should EFSA revise its work and update its conflicts of interest policies to avoid similar situations, in the future?

    Submitted: 11.2.2025

    Last updated: 27 February 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Moldovan legislature’s worrying attack on the rule of law and its impact on European aid to Moldova – P-000798/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Priority question for written answer  P-000798/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Auke Zijlstra (PfE)

    On 19 February 2025, the head of Moldova’s Anti-Corruption Prosecutor’s Office submitted her resignation to the Prosecutor-General. She cites as the reason for her resignation the bill proposing the abolition of the Anti-Corruption Prosecutor’s Office, which she says would weaken Moldova’s ability to hold those in power accountable for breaking the law. She voices concern at the Moldovan legislature’s undermining of the rule of law, and believes it will have serious implications for her country’s European future.

    • 1.How does the Commission view these worrying initiatives on the part of the Moldovan legislature regarding the abolition of the Anti-Corruption Prosecutor’s Office?
    • 2.What implications does this development have for the Reform and Growth Facility for Moldova and EU accession talks with the country?
    • 3.Does the Commission share the view of Mr Victor Negrescu – rapporteur for the Reform and Growth Facility for Moldova – that the reservations expressed, among others, by the Committee on Budgetary Control in the opinion on the Facility for Moldova about the need for strict control of the use of funds in Moldova are ‘unfounded’?

    Submitted: 20.2.2025

    Last updated: 27 February 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Denmark: Norlase secures €20 million EIB venture debt to advance ophthalmic laser technology.

    Source: European Investment Bank

    • Denmark’s med-tech sector receives a boost as Norlase strengthens its position in the global ophthalmic laser market with EIB venture debt financing.
    • Norlase will employ the funding for the further development and market access of its innovative portable ophthalmic laser technology.
    • The EIB’s financing is backed under the European Commission’s InvestEU initiative.

    Med-tech company Norlase, a spin-out of the Technical University of Denmark (DTU), has signed a €20 million venture debt financing with the European Investment Bank (EIB). The funding will support the expansion of Norlase’s innovative ophthalmic laser technology, reinforcing Denmark’s position as a hub for world-class med-tech innovation. Ensuring that European companies developing critical technology have the possibility and funding to grow in the EU, is an important building block in European strategic autonomy. The EIB financing is supported by the European Commission’s InvestEU programme.

    “Denmark’s efforts in building up its bio- and med-tech ecosystem are definitely paying dividends today. Like other Danish companies we recently financed, Norlase’s technology is top of its class and a real example of excellence in European innovation.” said EIB Vice-President Ioannis Tsakiris. “With the support of InvestEU, the EIB finances projects that advance state-of-the-art medical treatment, and this funding aims to enhance the position of Norlase as a European med-tech champion.”

    “As the patient burden continues to grow, the need to accelerate technological innovation in eye care has never been greater. With four product launches in just five years and rapid adoption by the ophthalmic community, Norlase is leading this transformation,” said Norlase CEO and Co-founder Oliver Hvidt. “This funding from the EIB allows us to scale our global presence and push even further beyond the limits of existing technology, solidifying Norlase’s role as a leader in the future of eye care. We’re just getting started.”

    The Head of the European Commission Representation to Denmark, Per Haugaard, added: “It’s crucial that European companies develop critical technology and that we secure investments in med-tech companies like Norlase across the continent.”

    On a technical level, the financing will support the development and market access of Norlase’s innovative portable ophthalmic lasers, designed to diagnose and treat causes of vision loss and blindness. The project focuses on advancing novel ophthalmic laser technologies and expanding production facilities to support increased demand. The company recently launched its fourth and most innovative device, LYNX, which can reduce treatment time by more than 50%, setting new standards for efficiency, accessibility, and precision in ophthalmic laser treatments.

    Background information

    The European Investment Bank is the long-term lending institution of the European Union, owned by its Member States. It finances investments that contribute to EU policy objectives. EIB projects bolster competitiveness, drive innovation, promote sustainable development, enhance social and territorial cohesion, contribute to peace and security, and support a just and swift transition to climate neutrality. The Group’s AAA rating allows it to borrow at favourable conditions on the global markets, benefiting its clients within the European Union and beyond. The Group has the highest ESG standards and a tier one capital ratio of 32%.

    High-quality, up-to-date photos of our headquarters for media use are available here.

    The InvestEU programme provides the European Union with crucial long-term funding by leveraging substantial private and public funds in support of a sustainable economy. It helps generate additional investments in line with EU policy priorities, such as the European Green Deal, the digital transition and support for small and medium-sized enterprises. InvestEU brings all EU financial instruments together under one roof, making funding for investment projects in Europe simpler, more efficient, and more flexible. The programme consists of three components: the InvestEU Fund, the InvestEU Advisory Hub, and the InvestEU Portal. The InvestEU Fund is implemented through financial partners who invest in projects using the EU budget guarantee of €26.2 billion. This guarantee increases their risk-bearing capacity, thus mobilising at least €372 billion in additional investment.

    Norlase was founded in Denmark to commercialize patented laser technology developed at the Technical University of Denmark (DTU) and its products are now in use in the top ophthalmic hospitals globally.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Multiannual financial framework and Common Agricultural Policy – E-000680/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-000680/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Christine Singer (Renew), Engin Eroglu (Renew), Joachim Streit (Renew)

    The Commission is expected to present its draft multiannual financial framework (MFF) for 2028-2034 in July 2025. This budget will have to address new defence and security challenges while maintaining intensive efforts to combat climate change. It must also become ‘more focused, simpler and more impactful’. At the same time, the mission letter from Commissioner Hansen stressed the need for the existing legal framework to be much simplified. Given all of these lines of thought on legislative reform, one wonders how the Commission will ensure that all relevant stakeholders – in particular regional governments, agricultural associations, industry representatives and actors from rural areas – will remain actively involved in the design and implementation of EU funding. These groups have in-depth knowledge of regional and sectoral conditions and make a significant contribution to the successful implementation of the relevant programmes. It is of utmost importance that they are involved at an early stage and throughout the process if we wish to ensure that funding is used in a targeted, practical and needs-based manner.

    • 1.How does the Commission intend to ensure that EU funding is provided in a simpler and more targeted and effective manner without neglecting the specific needs of EU agriculture, rural areas and the food production sector?
    • 2.How does it intend to maintain a uniform legal framework for a unified and adequately funded common agricultural policy?

    Submitted: 13.2.2025

    Last updated: 27 February 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Donald Trump Jr hunt in Veneto and killing of ruddy shelduck – E-000678/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-000678/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Dario Tamburrano (The Left)

    A number of newspapers[1] have published a video[2] of a hunt in Veneto[3] in which Donald Trump Jr, son of the US President, took part. He appears surrounded by dead birds in the video[4].

    The image quality makes it difficult to identify all the species. A ruddy shelduck appears to be recognisable in the foreground.

    Gesturing to it, Donald Trump Jr says, ‘This is actually a rather uncommon duck for the area. Not even sure what it is in English. But, er … incredible shoot.’ We therefore understand that it is rare and has been hunted (and not found dead, for example).

    A Veneto Regional Councillor said[5], ‘if [Trump Jr] acted in accordance with the rules, as seems to be the case, there is no reason for this hysteria’.

    The councillor is a member of Fratelli d’Italia, a ruling party in both Italy and the Veneto Region.

    The Minister for the Environment[6] said that perhaps a Trump Jr lookalike had shot the shelduck.

    As it stands, the Italian authorities have taken no action.

    In the light of the above:

    • 1.Does EU legislation allow for the hunting of ruddy shelducks[7]?
    • 2.If it does not allow for it, what steps will the Commission take in this case, both generally and specifically if Italy itself takes no action?

    Submitted: 13.2.2025

    • [1] For instance: https://t.ly/hMHnA.
    • [2] The video appeared on – and was subsequently deleted from – Field Ethos: https://edition.cnn.com/2025/02/05/travel/video/donald-trump-junior-accused-of-shooting-rare-duck-italy-digvid – around 00:25 et seq.
    • [3] The hunt presumably took place in late December or early January: Christmas decorations appear in one indoors scene.
    • [4] 01:38 et seq.
    • [5] https://t.ly/KOiLM
    • [6] https://t.ly/x9-Of
    • [7] The question does not concern the theoretical possibility of hunting (conceivably by way of derogation) ruddy shelducks, but their actual hunting (and in recent months), also bearing in mind that the 2024-25 hunting schedule of the Veneto Region does not provide for the hunting of ruddy shelducks by way of derogation itself – https://bur.regione.veneto.it/BurvServices/pubblica/DettaglioDgr.aspx?id=532485.
    Last updated: 27 February 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Absence of a new EU heating and cooling strategy – E-000748/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-000748/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Yannis Maniatis (S&D)

    Bearing in mind that the most recent EU heating and cooling strategy dates back to 2016 and that solar thermal energy technology is developed and produced in the EU, providing European industry and agricultural production with cheap and green thermal energy that is not dependent on geopolitical and economic developments and allows for lower household energy bills and CO2 emissions in buildings, can the Commission answer the following:

    • 1.Does it plan to present a new heating and cooling strategy as part of its targets for reducing emissions by 90 % by 2040 and for improving energy security and reducing energy costs, finally leading to a ‘Made in Europe’ solar industry that will boost the EU’s competitiveness?
    • 2.What measures does it intend to put forward as part of the Clean Industrial Deal, so that Europe’s dynamic solar thermal energy system manufacturing industry can continue to grow despite – often unfair – international competition, avoiding the mistakes that doomed European solar panel production in the previous decade?

    Submitted: 14.2.2025

    Last updated: 27 February 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – A Competitiveness Compass for the EU – the Commission’s plans for public procurement – E-000697/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-000697/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Piotr Müller (ECR)

    The document entitled ‘A Competitiveness Compass for the EU’, published by the Commission, refers among other things to public procurement.

    It is steeped in ideologically driven propaganda aimed at promoting green ideology, even in public procurement. In this document, the Commission emphasises the importance of integrating environmental aspects into public procurement processes, indicating their potential to promote sustainable products and services and to support the EU’s green transition.

    The document promotes these practices by encouraging public institutions to give preferential treatment to goods and services with a reduced environmental impact throughout their life cycle.

    In view of the planned revision of the public procurement directives, could the Commission please answer the following:

    • 1.Does the Commission intend to make Green Public Procurement (GPP) mandatory for certain categories of public procurement?
    • 2.How does the Commission intend to reconcile the promotion of Green Public Procurement with the principle of free competition and the free choice of the best products and services, regardless of their ideological characteristics?
    • 3.Is the Commission not concerned that favouring specific categories of procurement could lead to reduced competition and increased costs for the public sector?

    Submitted: 14.2.2025

    Last updated: 27 February 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Overhauling the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034: can the Commission guarantee that common agricultural policy funding won’t be cut to finance other priorities? – E-000692/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-000692/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Mathilde Androuët (PfE)

    An overhaul of the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034 was announced several months ago, and a copy has already been published[1]. Given the costly priorities set out in the document, which will eat up a lot of the budget, questions arise as to the introduction of new revenue and the uncertainty surrounding financing via new own resources. No clear political and legal agreement has yet been reached to make up for the fact that there has been no increase in Member States’ national contributions.

    The Commission is considering new taxes, such as the extension of the EU’s Emissions Trading System, the introduction of the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism and the establishment of a minimum tax on multinationals. Even if an agreement is reached, however, these would not be enough to cover the shortfall.

    With no new revenue, the EU will have no choice but to cut existing budgets, and this could undermine a key sector like agriculture. The common agricultural policy (CAP) is vital for France and its farming industry, which is already reeling, in particular owing to the proliferation of free trade agreements.

    With NextGenerationEU[2] debt – estimated at between EUR 25 billion and EUR 30 billion per year as of 2028 – likely to result in budget cuts, can the Commission guarantee that CAP funding will not be cut to finance other priorities?

    Submitted: 13.2.2025

    • [1] https://www.contexte.com/actualite/pouvoirs/budget-post-2027-la-commission-pose-les-premieres-pierres-dun-chantier-titanesque_218085.html
    • [2] https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/recovery-plan-europe_en
    Last updated: 27 February 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Addressing the impact of the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism on the wind energy sector – E-000774/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-000774/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Dan-Ştefan Motreanu (PPE)

    The implementation of the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) in 2026 raises serious concerns for the wind energy sector in the EU. According to a study commissioned by WindEurope, the cost of CBAM certificates for steel used in wind turbines, combined with the administrative burden of calculating embedded emissions, will significantly impact the industry’s competitiveness.

    The study, conducted by EY, estimates that each wind turbine produced in the EU could face an additional cost of EUR 910 000 associated with CBAM certificates. These rising costs are challenging to pass on to consumers, potentially undermining the expansion of wind energy at a time when the EU is striving to accelerate its clean energy transition.

    As wind energy is a cornerstone of the European Green Deal and the EU’s energy security strategy, what measures does the Commission plan to take to mitigate the financial and administrative burden of the CBAM on the wind industry, while ensuring the policy achieves its climate objectives?

    Submitted: 19.2.2025

    Last updated: 27 February 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – What commitments will the Commission make with regard to the democratic control and legitimacy of the fiscal reforms planned in the 2028-2034 Multiannual Financial Framework? – E-000693/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-000693/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Mathilde Androuët (PfE)

    The framework and components of the redesigned Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) for the years 2028-2034 have already been circulated[1]. The EU’s unprecedented debt, on top of the growing needs and the Member States’ reluctance to increase their contributions, is causing a budgetary deadlock, ‘trilemma’ even.

    As we know, any major fiscal reform – made necessary by this critical situation – will be subject to unanimity among the Member States and often national ratification. With European populations becoming increasingly distrustful of supranational entities, this not only makes for a drawn-out process but one in which it is difficult to get decisions adopted. There are concerns that the Commission will try to use interinstitutional or administrative mechanisms to get around this issue.

    To dispel these fears and doubts as to whether the democratic wishes in the Member States will be taken into account, will the Commission make a commitment to respecting these principles and not circumventing national sovereignty by using interinstitutional mechanisms or delegated regulations?

    Submitted: 13.2.2025

    • [1] https://www.contexte.com/actualite/pouvoirs/budget-post-2027-la-commission-pose-les-premieres-pierres-dun-chantier-titanesque_218085.html?go-back-to-briefitem=218085
    Last updated: 27 February 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – The use of Paragon Solutions spyware against journalists – E-000617/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-000617/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Sandro Ruotolo (S&D), Camilla Laureti (S&D), Marco Tarquinio (S&D), Brando Benifei (S&D), Annalisa Corrado (S&D), Elisabetta Gualmini (S&D), Alessandra Moretti (S&D), Cecilia Strada (S&D), Alessandro Zan (S&D), Birgit Sippel (S&D), Estelle Ceulemans (S&D), Hannes Heide (S&D), Alex Agius Saliba (S&D), Krzysztof Śmiszek (S&D), Mimmo Lucano (The Left), Gaetano Pedulla’ (The Left), Emma Rafowicz (S&D), Pasquale Tridico (The Left), Matjaž Nemec (S&D), Chloé Ridel (S&D), Benedetta Scuderi (Verts/ALE), Cristina Guarda (Verts/ALE), Ignazio Roberto Marino (Verts/ALE), Valentina Palmisano (The Left)

    The online newspaper ‘Fanpage.it’, known for conducting investigations on leaders and militants of Italy’s ruling majority party, reported that the electronic device of its director, Francesco Cancellato, had been bugged by spyware developed by the company Paragon Solutions.

    WhatsApp announced that 90 journalists and members of civil society worldwide had been spied on by this software to collect sensitive data and intercept private communications.

    While the Italian Government has publicly denied any secret service involvement in this matter, Paragon Solutions may have just ‘terminated its client relationship with Italy’ following the revelations about spying on those journalists, according to The Guardian[1].

    • 1.If it is confirmed that the Italian Government is a client of Paragon Solutions and is responsible for this action, would it constitute a violation of Directives 2002/58/EC, (EU) 2019/1937 and 2013/40/EU and Regulation (EU) 2016/679?
    • 2.Is the Commission aware of the use of Paragon spyware against journalists and activists in the EU?
    • 3.What measures does the Commission intend to take to protect press freedom and journalists from such attacks, and will the Commission launch an investigation to discover the extent of the violation and who the perpetrators are and to take measures against them?

    Submitted: 11.2.2025

    • [1] https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2025/feb/06/owner-of-spyware-used-in-alleged-whatsapp-breach-ends-contract-with-italy.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Harmonisation of nutritional composition and labelling requirements for young child formula in the EU – E-000696/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-000696/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Tomáš Zdechovský (PPE)

    The Political Guidelines for the new Commission state: ‘We need a new momentum to complete the single market’. This is also true for a number of food products. The EU single market is notably fragmented when it comes to young child formula (YCF), also known as ‘growing up milk’.

    While the EU strictly regulates the formula for infants up to the age of one, this is not the case for YCF for children aged one to three. Today, there is a fragmentation of the EU internal market: the composition and labels have to be adapted to the different interpretations and requirements of Member States.

    In addition, according to the Commission’s 2016 report on YCF[1] , ‘EU manufacturers are leaders in the global scene’. However, the lack of strict and harmonised EU regulation might threaten the trust in and popularity of European-made YCF in third countries.

    Does the Commission plan to regulate nutritional composition and labelling in relation to nutrition reference value requirements for YCF at the EU level?

    Submitted: 14.2.2025

    • [1] COM(2016)0169, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52016DC0169.
    Last updated: 27 February 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: REPORT on the European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2025 – A10-0023/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION

    on the European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2025

    (2024/2084(INI))

    The European Parliament,

     having regard to Article 3 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU),

      having regard to Articles 9, 121, 148 and 149 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU),

     having regard to the European Pillar of Social Rights (EPSR) proclaimed and signed by the Council, Parliament and the Commission on 17 November 2017,

     having regard to the Commission communication of 4 March 2021 entitled ‘The European Pillar of Social Rights Action Plan’ (COM(2021)0102) and its proposed 2030 headline targets on employment, skills and poverty reduction,

     having regard to the Commission communication of 17 December 2024 entitled ‘2025 European Semester – Autumn package’ (COM(2024)0700),

     having regard to the Commission communication of 26 November 2024 entitled ‘2025 European Semester: bringing the new economic governance framework to life’ (COM(2024)0705),

      having regard to the Commission proposal of 17 December 2024 for a joint employment report from the Commission and the Council (COM(2024)0701),

     having regard to the Commission recommendation of 17 December 2024 for a Council recommendation on the economic policy of the euro area (COM(2024)0704),

      having regard to the Commission report of 17 December 2024 entitled ‘Alert Mechanism Report 2025’ (COM(2024)0702),

      having regard to the Commission staff working document of 26 November 2024 entitled ‘Fiscal statistical tables providing relevant background data for the assessment of the 2025 draft budgetary plans’ (SWD(2024)0950),

     having regard to the Commission staff working document of 17 December 2024 on the changes in the scoreboard the Macroeconomic Imbalance Procedure Scoreboard in the context of the regular review process (SWD(2024)0702),

     having regard to its resolution of 22 October 2024 on the Council position on Draft amending budget No 4/2024 of the European Union for the financial year 2024 – update of revenue (own resources) and adjustments to some decentralised agencies[1],

     having regard to Mario Draghi’s report of 9 September 2024 entitled ‘The future of European competitiveness’,

     having regard to Enrico Letta’s report of April 2024 on the future of the single market[2],

     having regard to the La Hulpe Declaration on the Future of the European Pillar of Social Rights signed by Parliament, the Commission, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Council on 16 April 2024,

     having regard to the Regulation (EU) 2023/955 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 May 2023 establishing a Social Climate Fund and amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1060[3],

     having regard to the Regulation (EU) 2024/1263 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2024 on the effective coordination of economic policies and on multilateral budgetary surveillance and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1466/97[4], and in particular to Articles 3, 4, 13 and 27 thereof,

     having regard to the Commission communication of 17 January 2023 entitled ‘Harnessing talent in Europe’s regions’ (COM(2023)0032),

     having regard to the Commission communication of 20 March 2023 entitled ‘Labour and skills shortages in the EU: an action plan’ (COM(2024)0131),

     having regard to the 2020 European Skills Agenda,

     having regard to the Commission communication of 7 September 2022 on the European care strategy (COM(2022)0440),

     having regard to the Council Recommendation on access to affordable, high-quality long-term care[5],

     having regard to the EU Social Scoreboard and its headline and secondary indicators,

     having regard to the Commission communication of 3 March 2021 entitled ‘Union of Equality: Strategy for the Rights of Persons with Disabilities 2021-2030’ (COM(2021)0101),

     having regard to the Commission report of 19 September 2024 entitled ‘Employment and Social Developments in Europe (ESDE): upward social convergence in the EU and the role of social investment’,

     having regard to the Council Decision on Employment Guidelines, adopted by the Employment, Social Policy, Health and Consumer Affairs Council on 2 December 2024, which establishes employment and social priorities aligned with the principles of the EPSR,

     having regard to the Tripartite Declaration for a thriving European Social Dialogue and to the forthcoming pact on social dialogue,

     having regard to Directive (EU) 2022/2041 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 October 2022 on adequate minimum wages in the European Union[6] (Minimum Wage Directive),

     having regard to the European Social Charter, referred to in the preamble of the EPSR,

     having regard to the EU Roma strategic framework for equality, inclusion and participation for 2020-2030,

     having regard to the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs),

     having regard to the Gender Equality Strategy 2020-2025,

     having regard to the EU Anti-Racism Action Plan 2020-2025,

     having regard to the LGBTIQ Equality Strategy 2020-2025,

     having regard to Rule 55 of its Rules of Procedure,

     having regard to the report of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs (A10-0023/2025),

    A. whereas progress has been made towards achieving the EU’s employment targets, namely that at least 78 % of people aged 20 to 64 should be in employment by 2030, despite the uncertainty created by Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and the impact of high inflation; whereas, according to the Commission’s 2025 autumn economic forecast, EU employment has reached a rate of 75.3 %; whereas growth in employment in the EU remained robust in 2023; whereas in two thirds of the Member States, employment growth in 2023 was on track to reach the national 2030 target; whereas significant challenges nevertheless persist, such as high unemployment rates in some Member States, particularly among young people and persons with disabilities, as do significant inequalities between sectors and regions, which can negatively affect social cohesion and the well-being of European citizens in the long term;

    B. whereas the European Semester combines various different instruments in an integrated framework for multilateral coordination and surveillance of economic, employment and social policies within the EU and it must become a key tool for fostering upward social convergence; whereas the Social Convergence Framework is a key tool for assessing social challenges and upward convergence within the European Semester and for monitoring social disparities across Member States, while addressing the challenges identified in the Joint Employment Report (JER);

    C. whereas the Union has adopted the 2030 target of reducing the number of people at risk of poverty and social exclusion by at least 15 million compared to 2019, including at least 5 million children; whereas in nearly half of the Member States the trend is heading in the opposite direction; whereas one child in four in the European Union is still at risk of poverty and social exclusion; and whereas the current trend will not make it possible to meet the 2030 target; whereas public spending on children and youth should not be seen only as social expenditure but as an investment in the future; whereas the promotion of strong, sustainable and inclusive economic growth can succeed only if the next generation can develop their full educational potential in order to be prepared for the changing labour market, whereas to meet the 2030 Barcelona targets for early childhood education and care, the EU should invest an additional EUR 11 billion per year[7];

    D. whereas despite a minimal reduction in the number of people at risk of poverty or social exclusion in the EU in 2023, approximately one in five still faces this challenge, with notable disparities for children, young and older people, persons with disabilities, LGTBI, non-EU born individuals, and Roma communities;

    E. whereas significant disparities are observed among children from ethnic or migrant backgrounds and children with disabilities; whereas 83 % of Roma children live in households at risk of poverty; whereas the EU and national resources currently deployed are in no way sufficient for addressing the challenge of child poverty in the EU and, therefore, a dedicated funding instrument for the European Child Guarantee as well as synergies with other European and national funds are of the utmost importance in both the current multiannual financial framework (MFF) and the next one;

    F. whereas the EPSR must be the compass guiding EU social and economic policies, whereas the Commission should monitor progress on the implementation of the EPSR using the Social Scoreboard and the Social Convergence Framework;

    G. whereas poor quality jobs among the self-employed are disproportionately widespread while the rate of self-employment is declining, including among young people;

    H. whereas there are still 1.4 million people residing in institutions in the EU; whereas residents of institutions are isolated from the broader community and do not have sufficient control over their lives and the decisions that affect them; whereas despite the fact that the European Union has long been committed to the process of deinstitutionalisation, efforts are still needed at both European and national level to enable vulnerable groups to live independently in a community environment;

    I. whereas demographic challenges, including an ageing population, low birth rates and rural depopulation, with young people in particular moving to urban areas, profoundly affect the economic vitality and attractiveness of EU regions, the labour markets, and consequently, the sustainability of welfare systems, and further aggravate the regional disparities in the EU, and hence represent a structural challenge for the EU economy; and whereas, as underlined in the Draghi report, sustainable growth and competitiveness in Europe depend to a large extent on adapting education and training systems to evolving skills needs, prioritising adult learning and vocational education and training, and the inclusion of the active population in the labour market and on a robust welfare system;

    J. whereas, as highlighted in the Draghi report, migrant workers have been an important factor in reducing labour shortages and are more likely to work in occupations with persistent shortages than workers born in the EU;

    K. whereas 70 % of workers in Europe are in good-quality jobs, 30 % are in high-strain jobs where demands are more numerous than resources available to balance them leading to overall poor job quality; whereas in many occupations suffering from persistent labour shortages the share of low-quality jobs is higher than 30 %;

    L. whereas the Letta report states that there is a decline in the birth rate, noting the importance of creating a framework to support all families as part of a strategy of inclusive growth in line with the EPSR; whereas the report notes that the free movement of people remains the least developed of the four freedoms and argues for reducing barriers to intra-EU occupational mobility while addressing the social, economic and political challenges facing the sending Member States and their most disadvantaged regions, as well as safeguarding the right to stay; whereas there is a need to promote family-friendly and work-life balance policies, ensuring accessible and professional care systems as well as public quality education, family-related leave and flexible working arrangements in line with the European Care Strategy;

    M. whereas inflation has increased the economic burden on households, having a particularly negative impact on groups in vulnerable situations, such as single parents, large families, older people or persons with disabilities, whereas housing costs and energy poverty remain major problems; whereas housing is becoming unaffordable for those who live in households where housing costs account for 40 % of total disposable income; whereas investment in social services, housing supply – including social housing – and policies that facilitate the accessibility and affordability of housing play a key role in reducing poverty among vulnerable households;

    N. whereas the EU’s micro, small and medium-sized enterprises face particular challenges such as staying competitive against third-country players, maintaining production levels despite rising energy costs and finding the necessary skills for the green and digital transitions; whereas they need financial and technical support to comply with regulatory requirements and take advantage of the opportunities offered by the twin transitions;

    O. whereas labour and skills shortages remain a problem at all levels, and are reported by companies of all sizes and sectors; whereas these shortages are exacerbated by a lack of candidates to fill critical positions in key sectors such as education, healthcare, transport, science, technology, engineering and construction, especially in areas affected by depopulation; whereas these shortages can result from a number of factors, such as difficult working conditions, unattractive salaries, demand for new skill sets and a shortage of relevant training, the lack of public services, barriers of access to medium and higher education and lack of recognition of skills and education;

    P. whereas the Union has adopted the target that at least 60 % of adults should participate in training every year by 2030; whereas the Member States have committed themselves to national targets in order to achieve this headline goal and whereas the majority of Member States lost ground in the pursuit of these national targets; whereas further efforts are needed to ensure the provision of, and access to, quality training policies that promote lifelong learning; whereas upskilling, reskilling and training programmes must be available for all workers, including those with disabilities, and should also be adapted to workers’ needs and capabilities;

    Q. whereas in 2022, the average Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) score across the OECD on the measures of basic skills (reading, mathematics and science) of 15-year-olds dropped by 10 points compared to the last wave in 2018; whereas underachievement is prevalent among disadvantaged learners, demonstrating a widening of educational inequalities; whereas this worrying deterioration calls for reforms and investments in education and training;

    R. whereas the EU’s capacity to deal with future shocks, crises and ‘polycrises’ while navigating the demographic, digital and green transitions, will depend greatly on the conditions under which critical workers will be able to perform their work; whereas addressing the shortages and retaining all types of talent requires decent working conditions, access to social protection systems, and opportunities for skills development tailored to the needs; and whereas addressing skills shortages is crucial to achieving the digital and green transitions, ensuring inclusive and sustainable growth and boosting the EU’s competitiveness;

    S. whereas it is essential to promote mobility within the EU and consider attracting skilled workers from third countries, while ensuring respect for and enforcement of labour and social rights and channelling third-country nationals entering the EU through legal migration pathways towards occupations experiencing shortages, supported by an effective integration policy, in full complementarity with harnessing talents from within the Union;

    T. whereas gender pay gaps remain considerable in most EU Member States and whereas care responsibilities are an important factor that continue to constrain women into part-time employment or lead to their exclusion from the labour market, resulting in a wider gender employment gap;

    U. whereas the JER highlights the right to disconnect, in particular in the context of telework, acknowledging the critical role of this right in ensuring a work-life balance in a context of increasing digitalisation and remote working;

    V. whereas challenges to several sectors, such as automotive manufacturing and energy intensive industries, became evident in 2024 and a number of companies announced large-scale restructuring;

    W. whereas there are disparities in the coverage of social services, including long-term care, child protection, domestic violence support, and homelessness aid, that need to be addressed through the European Semester;

    X. whereas there is currently no regular EU-wide collection of data on social services investment and coverage; whereas collecting such data is key for an evidence-based analysis of national social policies in the European Semester analysis; whereas this should be addressed through jointly agreed criteria and data collection standards for social services investment and coverage in the Member States; whereas the European Social Network’s Social Services Index is an example of how such data collection can contribute to the European Semester analysis;

    Y. whereas the crisis in generational renewal, demographic changes, and lack of sufficient investment in public services have led to an increased risk of poverty and social exclusion, particularly affecting children and older people, single-parent households and large families, the working poor, persons with disabilities, and people from marginalised backgrounds; whereas an ambitious EU anti-poverty strategy will be essential to reverse this trend and provide responses to the multidimensional phenomenon of poverty;

    Z. whereas Eurofound research shows that suicide rates have been creeping up since 2021, after decreasing for decades; whereas more needs to be done to address causes of mental health problems in working and living conditions (importantly social inclusion), and access to support for people with poor mental health remains a problem;

    AA. whereas there were still over 3 300 fatal accidents and almost 3 million nonfatal accidents in the EU-27 in 2021; whereas over 200 000 workers die each year from work-related illnesses; whereas these data do not include all accidents caused by undeclared work, making it plausible to assume that the true numbers greatly exceed the official statistics; whereas in 2017, according to Eurofound, 20 % of jobs in Europe were of ‘poor quality’ and put workers at increased risk regarding their physical or mental health; whereas 14 % of workers have been exposed to a high level of psychosocial risks; whereas 23 % of European workers believe that their safety or their health is at risk because of their work;

    AB. whereas the results of the April 2024 Eurobarometer survey on social Europe highlight that 88 % of European citizens consider social Europe to be important to them personally; whereas this was confirmed by the EU Post-Electoral Survey 2024, where European citizens cited rising prices and the cost of living (42 %) and the economic situation (41 %) as the main topics that motivated them to vote in the 2024 European elections;

    AC. whereas according to Article 3 TEU, social progress in the EU is one of the aims of a highly competitive social market economy, together with full employment, a high level of protection and improvement of the quality of the environment; whereas Article 3 TEU also states that the EU ‘shall combat social exclusion and discrimination, and shall promote social justice and protection, equality between women and men, solidarity between generations and protection of the rights of the child’;

    AD. whereas the new EU economic governance framework entered into force in April 2024 and aims to promote sustainable and inclusive growth and to give more space for social investment and achievement of the objectives of the EPSR; whereas, for the first time, the revision includes a social convergence framework as an integrated part of the European Semester;

    AE. whereas under the new EU economic governance framework, all Member States have to include reforms and investments in their medium-term plans addressing common EU priorities and challenges identified in country-specific recommendations in the context of the European Semester; whereas the common EU priorities include social and economic resilience, including the EPSR;

    AF. whereas European social partners, during Macroeconomic Dialogue, have denounced the lack of involvement of social partners in the drafting of the medium-term fiscal structural plans and ETUC, SMEUnited and SGIEurope have signed a joint statement for a material and factual involvement of social partners in the economic governance and the European Semester;

    AG. whereas public investment is expected to increase in 2025 in almost all Member States, with a significant contribution from NextGenerationEU’s Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF) and EU funds and will contribute to social spending, amounting to around 25 % of the total estimated expenditure under the RRF, securing growth and economic resilience[8]; whereas social investments and reforms in key areas can boost employment, social inclusion, competitiveness and economic growth[9]; whereas social partners are essential for designing and implementing policies that promote sustainable and inclusive growth, decent and quality work, and fair transitions and must be involved at all levels of governance in accordance with the TFEU;

    AH. whereas the Member States should implement the Minimum Wage Directive without delay and prepare action plans that increase collective bargaining coverage in line with the directive, where applicable;

    AI. whereas according to the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), on average across OECD countries, occupations at highest risk of automation account for about 28 % of employment[10]; whereas social dialogue and collective bargaining are crucial in this context to ensure a participatory approach to managing change driven by technological developments, addressing potential concerns, while fostering workers’ adaptation (including via skills provision); whereas digitalisation, robotisation, automation and artificial intelligence (AI) must benefit workers and society by improving working conditions and quality of life, ensuring a good work-life balance, creating better employment opportunities, and contributing to socio-economic convergence; whereas workers and their trade unions will play a critical role in anticipating and tackling risks emerging from those challenges;

     

    AJ. whereas social dialogue and collective bargaining are essential for the EU’s competitiveness, labour productivity and social cohesion;

    1. Considers that the Commission and the Council should strengthen their efforts to implement the EPSR, in line with the action plan of March 2021 and the La Hulpe Declaration, to achieve the 2030 headline targets; calls on the Commission to ensure that the JER 2026 analyses the implementation of all the principles of the EPSR in line with Regulation (EU) 2024/1263 and includes an analysis of the social dimension of the national medium-term fiscal structural plans related to social resilience, including the EPSR; welcomes, in this regard, the announcement of a new Action Plan on the implementation of the EPSR[11] for 2025 to give a new impetus to social progress; welcomes the fact that almost all Member States are expected to increase public investment in 2025, which is necessary to ensure access to quality public services and achieve the aims of the EPSR; recalls that the Member States can mobilise the RRF within the scope defined by the Regulation (EU) 2021/241[12] until 31 December 2026 on policies for sustainable and inclusive growth and the young;

    2. Stresses the importance of using the Social Scoreboard and the Social Convergence Framework to identify risks to, and to track progress in, reducing inequalities, strengthening social protection systems and promoting decent working conditions and supportive measures for workers to manage the transitions; stresses that in this regard, it is necessary to ensure a sustainable, fair and inclusive Europe where social rights are fully protected and safeguarded at the same level as economic freedoms; recalls that EU citizens identify social Europe as one of their priorities;

    3. Regrets the lack of data on and analysis of wealth inequality and wealth concentration in the EU as this is one of the main determinants of poverty; points out that according to Distributional Wealth Accounts, a dataset developed by the European System of Central Banks, the share of wealth held by the top 10 % stood at 56 % in the fourth quarter of 2023, while the bottom half held just 5 %;

    4. Welcomes the inclusion of analysis on the positive contribution of the SDGs and the European equality strategies in the JER 2025 and calls on the Commission to ensure that the JER 2026 includes both a section analysing the progress towards the SDGs related to employment and social policy, and another on progress towards eliminating social and labour discrimination in line with the Gender Equality Strategy 2020-2025, the EU Anti-Racism Action Plan 2020-2025, the EU Roma strategic framework for equality, inclusion and participation 2020-2030, the LGBTIQ Equality Strategy 2020-2025, and the Strategy for the rights of persons with disabilities 2021-2030;

    5. Calls on the Member States to implement the updated employment guidelines, with an emphasis on education and training for all, new technologies such as AI, and recent policy initiatives on platform work, affordable and decent housing and tackling labour and skills shortages, with a view to strengthening democratic decision-making;

    6. Reiterates the importance of investing in workforce skills development and occupational training and of ensuring quality employment, with an emphasis on the individual right to training and lifelong learning; urges the Member States to develop upskilling and reskilling measures in collaboration with local stakeholders, including educational and training bodies and the social partners, in order to reinforce the link between the education and training systems and the labour market and to anticipate labour market needs; welcomes the fact that employment outcomes for recent graduates from vocational education and training (VET) continue to improve across the EU; is concerned about young people’s declining educational performance, particularly in basic skills; welcomes, in this regard, the announcement of an Action Plan on Basic Skills and a STEM Education Strategic Plan; calls on the Member States to invest in programmes to equip learners with the basic, digital and transversal skills needed for the world of work and its digitisation as well as to help them to contribute meaningfully to society; recalls the important role that the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund for displaced workers can play in supporting and reskilling workers who were made redundant as a result of major restructuring events;

    7. Welcomes the announcement of a quality jobs roadmap to ensure a just transition for all; calls on the Commission to include in this roadmap considerations for measures linked to the use of AI and algorithmic management in the world of work so that new technologies are harnessed to improve working conditions and productivity while respecting workers’ rights and work-life balance as recognised in the JER[13]; calls on the Commission to propose a directive on the use of AI in the workplace that ensures that workers’ rights are protected and respected;

    8. Stresses that the response to labour shortages in the European Union also involves improving and facilitating labour mobility within the Union; calls on the Member States to strengthen and facilitate the recognition of skills and qualifications in the Union, including those of third-country nationals; calls on the Commission to analyse the effectiveness of the European Employment Services (EURES) platform with a view to a potential revision of its operation;

    9. Notes that the number of early leavers from education and training, people with lower levels of education, young people not in education, employment or training (NEETs) and among them vulnerable groups, including Roma, women, older people, low- and medium-qualified people, persons with disabilities and people with a migrant or minority background, depending on the country-specific context, remains high in several Member States, despite a downward trend in the European Union; calls on the Member States to reinforce the Youth Guarantee as stated in Principle 4 of the EPSR; in order to support young people in need throughout their personal and professional development; reiterates the pivotal role that VET plays in providing the knowledge, skills and competencies necessary for young people entering the labour market; emphasises the need to invest in the quality and attractiveness of VET through the European Social Fund Plus (ESF+); recalls, therefore, the need to address this situation and develop solutions to keep young people in education, training or employment and the importance of ensuring their access to traineeships and apprenticeships, enabling them to gain their first work experience and facilitating their transition from education to employment as well as to create working conditions that enable an ageing workforce to remain in the labour market;

    10. Considers that, although there has been an improvement, persons with disabilities, especially women with disabilities, still face significant obstacles in the labour market, and that there is therefore a need for vocational and digital training, while promoting the inclusion of persons with disabilities, targeting the inactive labour force and groups with low participation in the labour market, including women, young people, older workers and persons with chronic diseases; calls on the Commission to update the EU Disability Strategy with new flagship initiatives and actions from 2025 onwards, such as a European Disability Employment and Skills Guarantee and the sharing of best practices such as the disability card, in particular to address social inclusion and independent living for people with disabilities, also ensuring their access to quality education, training and employment through guidance on retaining disability allowances;

    11. Expresses concern that Roma continue to face significant barriers to employment, with persistent biases limiting their prospects; notes that the EU Roma strategic framework for equality, inclusion, and participation highlights a lack of progress in employment access and a growing share of Roma youth not in employment, education, or training; emphasises the framework’s goal of halving the employment gap between Roma and the general population and ensuring that at least 60 % of Roma are in paid work by 2030; urges the Member States to adopt an integrated, equality-focused approach and to ensure that public policies and services effectively reach all Roma, including those in remote rural areas;

    12. Stresses the need to pay attention to the social and environmental aspects of competitiveness, emphasising the need for investments in education and training for all to ensure universal access to high-quality public education and professional training programmes, as well as sustainable practices to foster inclusive growth; underlines that social partners should play a key role in identifying and addressing skills needs across the EU;

    13. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to include specific recommendations on housing affordability in the European Semester and to promote housing investment; urges the Member States to ensure that housing investments support long-term quality housing solutions that are actually affordable for low-income and middle-income households, highlighting that investments in social and affordable housing are crucial in order to ensure and improve the quality of life for all; stresses the need for a better use of EU funding, such as through European Investment Bank financial instruments, in particular to support investments to increase the energy efficiency of buildings; calls on the Commission and the Member States to take decisive action to provide an EU regulatory framework for the housing sector, together with an assessment of Union policies, funds and bottlenecks that should facilitate the construction, conversion and renovation of accessible, affordable and energy-efficient housing, including social housing, that meets the needs of young people, people with reduced mobility, low- and middle-income groups, families at risk and people in more vulnerable situations, while protecting homeowners and those seeking access to home ownership from a further reduction in supply;

    14. Welcomes the announced European Affordable Housing Plan to support Member States in addressing the housing crisis and soaring rents; calls on the Commission to assess and publish which potential barriers on State aid rules affect housing accessibility; recalls that the Social Climate Fund aims to provide financial aid to Member States from 2026 to support vulnerable households, in particular with measures and investments intended to increase the energy efficiency of buildings, decarbonisation of heating and cooling of buildings and the integration in buildings of renewable energy generation and storage;

    15. Considers that homelessness is a dramatic social problem in the EU; calls for a single definition of homelessness in the EU, which would enable the systematic comparison and assessment of the extent of homelessness across different EU Member States; calls on the Commission to develop a strategy and work towards ending homelessness in the EU by 2030 by promoting access to affordable and decent housing as well as access to quality social services; urges the Member States to better use the available EU instruments, including the ESF+, in this matter[14];

    16. Calls on the Member States to design national homelessness strategies centred around housing-based solutions; welcomes the intention to deliver a Council recommendation on homelessness[15]; urges the Commission to further increase the ambition of the European Platform on Combating Homelessness, in particular by providing it with a dedicated budget;

    17. Considers that EU action is urgently needed to address the persistently high levels of poverty and social exclusion in the EU, particularly among children, young and older people, persons with disabilities, non-EU born individuals, LGTBI and Roma communities; highlights that access to quality social services should be prioritised, with binding targets to reduce homelessness and ensure energy security for vulnerable households; calls on the Commission to adopt the first-ever EU Anti-Poverty Strategy;

    18. Recalls the Union objective of transitioning from institutional to community or family-based care; calls on the Commission to put forward an action plan on deinstitutionalisation; stresses that this action plan should cover all groups still living in institutions, including children, persons with disabilities, people with mental health issues, people affected by homelessness and older people; calls on the Member States to make full use of the ESF+ funds as well as other relevant European and national funds in order to finalise the deinstitutionalisation process so as to ensure that every EU citizen can live in a family or community environment;

    19. Calls on the Commission to deliver a European action plan for mental health, in line with its recent recommendations[16], and to complement it with a directive on psychosocial risks in the workplace; calls on the Member States to strengthen access to mental health services and emotional support programmes for all, particularly children, young people and older people; requests a better use of the Social Scoreboard indicators to address the impact of precarious living conditions and uncertainty on mental health;

    20. Calls on the Commission to address loneliness by promoting a holistic EU strategy on loneliness and access to professional care; calls also for this EU strategy to address the socio-economic impact of loneliness on productivity and well-being by tackling issues such as rural isolation; urges the Member States to continue implementing the Council recommendation on access to affordable, quality long-term care with a view to ensuring access to quality care while ensuring decent working conditions for workers in the care sector, as well as for informal carers;

    21. Recognises that 44 million Europeans are frequent informal long-term caregivers, the majority of whom are women[17];

    22. Recognises the unique role of carers in society, and while the definition of care workers is not harmonised across the EU, the long-term care sector employs 6.4 million people across the EU;

    23. Is concerned that, in 2023, 94.6 million people in the EU were still at risk of poverty or social exclusion; stresses that without a paradigm shift in the approach to combating poverty, the European Union and its Member States will not achieve their poverty reduction objectives; believes that the announcement of the first-ever EU Anti-Poverty Strategy is a step in the right direction towards reversing the trend, but must provide a comprehensive approach to tackling the multidimensional aspects of poverty and social exclusion with concrete actions, strong implementation and monitoring; calls for this Strategy to encompass everybody experiencing poverty and social exclusion, first and foremost the most disadvantaged, but also specific measures for different groups such as persons experiencing in-work poverty, homeless people, people with disabilities, single-parent families and, above all, children in order to sustainably break the cycle of poverty; stresses that the transposition of the Minimum Wage Directive will be key to preventing and fighting poverty risks among workers, while reinforcing incentives to work, and welcomes the fact that several Member States have amended or plan to amend their minimum wage frameworks; is concerned about the rise of non-standard forms of employment where workers are more likely to face in-work poverty and find themselves without adequate legal protections; stresses that an EU framework directive on adequate minimum income and active inclusion, in compliance with the subsidiarity principle, would contribute to the goals of reducing poverty and fostering the integration of people absent from the labour market;

    24. Reiterates its call on the Commission to carefully monitor implementation of the Child Guarantee in all Member States as part of the European Semester and country-specific recommendations; reiterates its call for an increase in the funding of the European Child Guarantee with a dedicated budget of at least EUR 20 billion and for all Member States to allocate at least 5 % of their allocated ESF+ funds to fighting child poverty and promoting children’s well-being; considers that the country-specific recommendations should reflect Member States’ budgetary compliance with the minimum required allocation for tackling child poverty set out in the ESF+ Regulation[18]; calls on the Commission to provide an ambitious budget for the Child Guarantee in the next MFF in order to respond to the growing challenge of child poverty and social exclusion;

    25. Is concerned about national policies that create gaps in health coverage, increasing inequalities both within and between Member States, such as privatisation of public healthcare systems, co-payments and lack of coverage; highlights that these deepen poverty, erode health and well-being, and increase social inequalities within and across EU countries; warns that this also undermines the implementation of principle 16 of the EPSR and of SDG 3.8 on universal health coverage, as well as the EPSR’s overall objective of promoting upward social convergence in the EU, leaving no one behind; believes that the indicators used in the Social Scoreboard do not provide a comprehensive understanding of healthcare affordability;

    26. Underlines that employers need to foster intergenerational links within companies and intergenerational learning between younger and older workers, and vice versa; underlines that an ageing workforce can help a business develop new products and services to adapt to the needs of an ageing society in a more creative and productive way; calls, furthermore, for the creation of incentives to encourage volunteering and mentoring to induce the transfer of knowledge between generations;

    27. Warns that, according to European Central Bank reports, real wages are still below their pre-pandemic level, while productivity was roughly the same; agrees that this creates some room for a non-inflationary recovery in real wages and warns that if real wages do not recover, this would increase the risk of protracted economic weakness, which could cause scarring effects and would further dent productivity in the euro area relative to other parts of the world; believes that better enforcement of minimum wages and strengthening collective bargaining coverage can have a beneficial effect on levels of wage inequality, especially by helping more vulnerable workers at the bottom of the wage distribution who are increasingly left out;

    28. Calls for the Member States to ensure decent working conditions, comprising among other things decent wages, access to social protection, lifelong learning opportunities, occupational health and safety, a good work-life balance and the right to disconnect, reasonable working time, workers’ representation, democracy at work and collective agreements; urges the Member States to foster democracy at work, social dialogue and collective bargaining and to protect workers’ rights, particularly in the context of the green and digital transitions, and to ensure equal pay for equal work by men and women, enhance pay transparency and address gender-based inequality to close the gender pay gap in the EU;

    29. Recalls the importance of improving access to social protection for the self-employed and calls on the Commission to monitor the Member States’ national plans for the implementation of the Council Recommendation of 8 November 2019 on access to social protection for workers and the self-employed[19] as part of the country-specific recommendations; recalls, in this regard, as the rate of self-employed professionals in the cultural and creative sectors is more than double that in the general population, the 13 initiatives laid down in the Commission’s 21 February 2024 response to the European Parliament resolution of 21 November 2023 on an EU framework for the social and professional situation of artists and workers in the cultural and creative sectors[20] and calls on the Commission to start implementing them in cooperation with the Member States;

    30. Stresses that the role of social dialogue and social partners should be systematically integrated into the design and implementation of employment and social policies, ensuring the involvement of social partners at all levels;

    31. Calls for the implementation of policies that promote work-life balance and the right to disconnect, with the aim of improving the quality of life for all families and workers, for ensuring the implementation of the Work-Life Balance Directive[21] and of the European Care Strategy; calls on the Commission to put forward a legislative proposal to address teleworking and the right to disconnect; as well as a proposal for the creation of a European card for all types of large families and a European action plan for single parents, offering educational and social advantages; calls, ultimately, for initiatives to combat workforce exclusion as a consequence of longer periods of sick leave, to adapt the workplace and to promote flexible working conditions and to develop strategies to support workers’ return after longer periods of absence;

    32. Calls for demographic challenges to be prioritised in the EU’s cohesion policy and for concrete action at EU and national levels; calls on the Commission to prioritise the development of the Commission communication on harnessing talent in Europe’s regions and the ‘Talent Booster Mechanism’ in order to promote social cohesion and to step up funding for rural and outermost areas and regions with a high rate of depopulation, supporting quality job creation, public services, local development projects and basic infrastructure that favour the population’s ‘right to stay’, especially in the case of young people; highlights the importance of introducing specific measures to address regional inequalities in education and training, ensuring equal access to high-quality and affordable education for all;

    33. Is concerned that, despite improvements, several population groups are still significantly under-represented in the EU labour market, including women, older people, low- and medium-qualified people, persons with disabilities and people with a migrant or minority background; warns that  educational inequalities have deepened, further exacerbating the vulnerabilities of students from disadvantaged and migrant backgrounds; points out that, according to the JER, people with migrant or minority backgrounds can significantly benefit from targeted measures in order to address skills mismatches, improve language proficiency, combat discrimination and receive tailored and integrated support services; stresses the importance of strengthening efforts in the implementation of the 2021-27 Action Plan on Integration and Inclusion, which provides a common policy framework to support the Member States in developing national migrant integration policies;

    34. Calls on the Commission and the Council to prioritise reducing administrative burdens with the aim of simplification while respecting labour and social standards; believes that better support for SMEs and actual and potential entrepreneurs will improve the EU’s competitiveness and long-term sustainability, boost innovation and create quality jobs; notes that SMEs and self-employed professionals in all sectors are essential for the EU’s economic growth and thus the financing of social policies; urges the implementation of specific recommendations to improve the single market; takes note of the Commission’s publication of the ‘Competitiveness Compass’ on 29 January 2025[22];

    35. Calls on the Commission to conduct competitiveness checks on every new legislative proposal, taking into account the overall impact of EU legislation on companies, as well as on other EU policies and programmes;

    36. Considers that the social economy is an essential component of the EU’s social market economy and a driver for the implementation of the EPSR and its targets, often providing employment to vulnerable and excluded groups; calls on the Commission and the Member States to strengthen their support for all social economy enterprises but especially non-profit ones, as highlighted in the Social Economy Action Plan 2021 and the Liège Roadmap for the Social Economy, in order to promote quality, decent, inclusive work and the circular economy, to encourage the Member States to facilitate access to funding and to enhance the visibility of social economy actors; calls for the Commission to explore innovative funding mechanisms to support the development of the social economy in Europe[23] and to foster a dynamic and inclusive business environment;

    37. Believes that, in this year of transition, with the implementation of the revised economic governance rules, the Member States should align fiscal responsibility with sustainable and inclusive growth and employment, notes that the involvement of social partners, including in the development of medium-term fiscal structural plans, should be enhanced to contribute to the goals of the new economic governance framework;

    38. Welcomes the fact that the national medium-term fiscal structural plans, under the new economic governance framework, have to include the reforms and investments responding to the main challenges identified in the context of the European Semester and also to ensure debt sustainability while investing strategically in the principles of the EPSR with the aim of fostering upward social convergence;

    39. Is concerned that compliance with the country-specific recommendations (CSRs) remains low; reiterates its call, therefore, for an effective implementation of CSRs by the Member States so as to promote healthcare and sustainable pension systems, in line with principles 15 and 16 of the EPSR, and long-term prosperity for all citizens, taking into account the vulnerability of those workers whose careers are segmented, intermittent and subject to labour transitions; insists that the Commission should reinforce its dialogues with the Member States on the implementation of existing recommendations and of the Employment Guidelines as well as on current or future policy action to address identified challenges;

    40. Welcomes the establishment of a framework to identify risks to social convergence within the European Semester, for which Parliament called strongly; recalls that under this framework, the Commission assesses risks to upward social convergence in Member States and monitors progress on the implementation of the EPSR on the basis of the Social Scoreboard and of the principles of the Social Convergence Framework; welcomes the fact that the 2025 JER delivers country-specific analysis based on the principles of the Social Convergence Framework; calls on the Commission to further develop innovative quantitative and qualitative analysis tools under this new Framework in order to make optimal use of it in the future cycles of the European Semester;

    41. Welcomes the fact that the first analysis based on the principles of the Social Convergence Framework points to upward convergence in the labour market in 2023[24]; notes with concern that employment outcomes of under-represented groups still need to improve and that risks to upward convergence persist at European level in relation to skills development, ranging from early education to lifelong learning, and the social outcomes of at-risk-of-poverty and social exclusion rates; calls on the Commission to further analyse these risks to upward social convergence in the second stage of the analysis and to discuss with the Member States concerned the measures undertaken or envisaged to address these risks;

    42. Recognises the cost of living crisis, which has increased the burden on households, and the rising cost of housing, which, in conjunction with high energy costs, is contributing to high levels of energy poverty across the EU; calls, therefore, on the Commission and Member States to comprehensively address the root causes of this crisis by prioritising policies that promote economic resilience, social cohesion, and sustainable development;

    43. Warns of the social risks stemming from the crisis in the automotive sector, which is facing unprecedented pressure from both external and internal factors; calls on the Commission to pay attention to this sector and enhance social dialogue and the participation of workers in transition processes; stresses the urgent need for a coordinated EU response via an emergency task force of trade unions and employers to respond to the current crisis;

    44. Calls on the Commission to monitor data on restructuring and its impact on employment, such as by using the European Restructuring Monitor, to facilitate measures in support of restructuring and labour market transitions, and to consider highlighting national measures supporting a socially responsible way of restructuring in the European Semester;

    45. Calls on the Commission to monitor the development of minimum wages in the Member States following the transposition of the Minimum Wage Directive to determine whether the goal of ‘adequacy’ of minimum wages is being achieved;

    46. Is concerned about the Commission’s revision of the Macroeconomic Imbalance Procedure (MIP) Scoreboard, particularly the reduction in employment and social indicators, which are crucial for assessing the social and labour market situation in the Member States; regrets the fact that youth unemployment is no longer considered as a headline indicator, despite its relevance in identifying and addressing specific labour market challenges and in adopting adequate public policies; stresses that social standards indicators should be given greater consideration in the decision-making process; regrets the fact that the Commission did not duly consult Parliament and reminds the Commission of its obligation to closely cooperate with Parliament, the Council and social partners before drawing up the MIP scoreboard and the set of macroeconomic and macro-financial indicators for Member States; stresses that the implementation of the principles of the EPSR must be part of the MIP scoreboard;

    47. Considers that territorial and social cohesion are essential components of the competitiveness agenda, and legislation such as the European Instrument for Temporary Support to Mitigate Unemployment Risks in an Emergency (SURE) remain a positive example to inspire future EU initiatives;

    48. Considers that the Commission and the Member States should ensure that fiscal policies under the European Semester support investments aligned with the EPSR, particularly in areas such as decent and affordable housing, quality healthcare, education, and social protection systems, as these are critical for social cohesion and long-term economic sustainability and to address the challenges identified through social indicators;

    49. Stresses the need to address key challenges identified in the Social Scoreboard as ‘critical’ and ‘to watch’, including children at risk of poverty or social exclusion, the gender employment gap, housing cost overburden, childcare, and long-term care the disability employment gap, the impact of social transfers on reducing poverty, and basic digital skills[25];

    50. Stresses the negative impacts that the cost of living crisis has had on persons with disabilities;

    51. Urges the Member States to consider robust policies that ensure fair wages and improve working conditions, particularly for low-income and precarious workers;

    52. Calls on the Member States to strengthen social safety nets to provide adequate support to those whose income from employment is insufficient to meet basic living costs;

    53. Stresses the need for timely and harmonised data on social policies to improve evidence-based policymaking and targeted social investments; calls for improvements to be made to the Social Scoreboard in order to cover the 20 EPSR principles with the introduction of relevant indicators reflecting trends and causes of inequality, such as quality employment, wealth distribution, access to public services, adequate pensions, the homelessness rate, mental health and unemployment; recalls that the at-risk-of-poverty-or-social-exclusion (AROPE) indicator fails to reveal the causes of complex inequality; calls on the Commission and the Member States to develop a European data collection framework on social services to monitor the investment in and coverage of social services;

    54. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council and the Commission.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Online consumer scams – E-000706/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-000706/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Regina Doherty (PPE)

    European consumers are regularly exposed to online scams. Travel website Booking.com has reported an alarming rise in scams related to its platform, which have increased by up to 900 %. Recent cases have shown how sophisticated these scams have become, with fraudsters gaining access to hotel accounts and sending legitimate-looking emails to trick customers into handing over their bank details.

    Can the Commission provide clarity on:

    • 1.Whether current EU consumer protection laws are being properly implemented online in light of the dramatic rise in fraud?
    • 2.Whether the Commission feels that the security measures of Booking.com are sufficient to prevent unauthorised access to customer data, particularly under the GDPR[1]?
    • 3.What action the Commission can take to provide better protection of consumer rights online?

    Submitted: 17.2.2025

    • [1] Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation), OJ L 119 04.05.2016, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/oj.
    Last updated: 27 February 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – The impact of climate change on deaths from heat and cold in European cities – E-000645/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-000645/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    César Luena (S&D)

    A new article published in Nature Medicine magazine[1], based on an in-depth study of 854 European cities, provides clear evidence that net mortality in Europe will increase even in the most benign climate change scenario. The assessments show that the net burden on health will increase substantially in scenarios involving extreme warming, and that this trend can only be reversed by bringing in adaptation measures on a massive scale in urban communities.

    Bearing in mind that the study emphasises the importance of adaptation to heat:

    • 1.How is the Commission intending to incorporate more robust adaptation measures into the EU’s strategy on adaptation to climate change, in particular with regard to urban communities and the most vulnerable age groups?
    • 2.Will the Commission be addressing this increasing risk to public health specifically in EU climate legislation?
    • 3.Given the regional disparities where the projected impact of climate change is concerned, with the most serious net effects in southern Europe, is the Commission planning to address this inequality as regards vulnerability to climate change in its next proposal for a multiannual financial framework?

    Submitted: 12.2.2025

    • [1] https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-024-03452-2.
    Last updated: 27 February 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Impact of the first Omnibus package on the European Green Deal – E-000720/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-000720/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    César Luena (S&D)

    In its presentation of the Competitiveness Compass, the Commission asks for all EU, national and local institutions to develop simple rules to speed up administrative procedures. That process will begin with the first in a series of Omnibus simplification packages. Focusing exclusively on investors, the first Omnibus will cover simplification relating to sustainable finance reporting, sustainability due diligence and taxonomy. What is missing, however, is an assessment of the environmental impact of the simplified regulations, which could be used by businesses to shirk their environmental obligations.

    In the light of the above:

    • 1.What impact does the Commission expect the Omnibus packages and wider simplification strategy to have on the Green Deal?
    • 2.How does the Commission believe the introduction of a small-mid cap will affect implementation of the European Green Deal, particularly in view of the proposed simplification of the carbon border adjustment mechanism?
    • 3.What measures is the Commission considering for businesses that fail to meet the new simplified and sustainable laws?

    Submitted: 17.2.2025

    Last updated: 27 February 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Russian shadow fleet and the environmental risk for our European waters and coastal communities – need for more action against the shadow fleet in the 16th sanctions package – E-000628/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-000628/2025
    to the Council
    Rule 144
    Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy (Renew)

    Over the past year, European ship owners have earned EUR 6 billion by selling old tankers to the Russian shadow fleet. Most of these tankers should have been taken out of operation, because they pose an environmental risk to European waters and European coastal communities. The Baltic countries are now discussing using environmental risk as a means to identify, enter and potentially seize these ships.

    • 1.Does the Council agree that, given the large amount of information that is publicly available about the shadow fleet and its illegal activities and strategies, companies could have suspected what their old oil tankers would be used for when they sold them?
    • 2.Is the Council prepared to sanction European companies who have knowingly sold old tankers to the shadow fleet?
    • 3.Does the Council agree that the next sanctions package against Russia should include a clause to prevent European companies from selling their old ships to any buyer who intends to use them transport to Russian oil, i.e. that this should become a contractual obligation between buyer and seller?

    Submitted: 11.2.2025

    Last updated: 27 February 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Fight against arms trafficking, especially of assault rifles – E-000710/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-000710/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Nadine Morano (PPE)

    On 5 February 2025, several masked men armed with Kalashnikov assault rifles opened fire in the Brussels metro, without hindrance.

    These long guns come from Eastern European countries, mainly the Balkans, and are regularly used in drug trafficking, gang-related activity, prison escapes, organised crime and terrorism on European soil. Their use by delinquents and criminals is becoming more and more normal.

    In France, Serbian assault rifles bought in Slovakia were notably used in both the Bataclan and Hypercacher attacks in 2015.

    In light of this:

    What specific actions will the Commission take to combat the trafficking of fire arms from the Balkans?

    Submitted: 17.2.2025

    Last updated: 27 February 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Establishing high-quality radiotherapy departments and modern oncology centres at public hospitals – E-000713/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-000713/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Giorgos Georgiou (The Left)

    Europe’s Beating Cancer Plan (COM(2021) 44) and the European Parliament resolution of 16 February 2022 on strengthening Europe in the fight against cancer (paragraph 105) stress the importance of establishing high-quality radiotherapy departments and modern oncology centres at public hospitals, based on European guidelines and in line with the latest scientific evidence.

    However, many patients in the EU sadly continue to face numerous difficulties as many oncology departments at public hospitals suffer from staff shortages and a lack of capacity. Cyprus is the only EU Member State without an integrated public oncology centre with a radiotherapy department, meaning that cancer patients have no other choice but to turn to the private sector.

    In view of the above:

    • 1.Will the Commission assess and provide published updates on the progress that each Member State makes in achieving the targets of the European strategy for quality public healthcare services?
    • 2.What steps will it take to support Member States in achieving the targets they have not yet met, thereby ensuring a common European public health standard for cancer prevention and treatment in all EU Member States?

    Submitted: 17.2.2025

    Last updated: 27 February 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Protein self-sufficiency – E-000708/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-000708/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Nadine Morano (PPE)

    The European Union is becoming less and less self-sufficient when it comes to protein, especially in terms of meeting its needs for animal husbandry.

    Less than 25 % of oilseed cakes and less than 5 % of soya cakes consumed in Europe are produced in Europe, making our producers dependent on third-country protein markets, in particular those in the Americas and Asia.

    Yet being self-sufficient in protein is key to being self-sufficient in food, which must remain one of the EU’s priority objectives.

    In this context, what action will the Commission take to strengthen the EU’s protein self-sufficiency?

    Submitted: 17.2.2025

    Last updated: 27 February 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – EU Energy Platform and the exclusion of non-corporate members – E-000723/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-000723/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Nikolaos Anadiotis (NI)

    The EU Energy Platform has been criticised for its controversial Industry Advisory Group (IAG), which includes corporate members from the natural gas sector but excludes non-corporate stakeholders such as civil society organisations. This lack of inclusiveness raises concerns about transparency and the undue influence of corporate interests in shaping critical energy policies that affect the wider public.

    The recent decision of the European Ombudsman[1] underlined the inappropriateness of IAG’s current composition, highlighting the over-representation of natural gas lobbies. This imbalance undermines the credibility of the platform and calls into question the EU’s commitment to fair and balanced energy policies. The exclusion of non-corporate members distorts the decision-making process, putting climate targets at risk.

    In light of this:

    • 1.What measures does the Commission intend to take to address the exclusion of non-corporate members from this group? Is there a timetable for the inclusion of a wider range of stakeholders?
    • 2.How does the Commission intend to ensure that energy transition policies are not disproportionately influenced by corporate interests, in particular those related to fossil fuels?

    Submitted: 17.2.2025

    • [1] https://corporateeurope.org/en/2024/09/eu-ombudsman-ruling-shows-gas-industry-advisory-group-not-fit-purpose-time-scrap-it
    Last updated: 27 February 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Environmental issues in the next multiannual financial framework and the future European Competitiveness Fund – E-000719/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-000719/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    César Luena (S&D)

    Within the context of revising the EU budget and tailoring it to the new competitiveness priorities, the Commission’s Competitiveness Compass proposes that the next multiannual financial framework (MFF) include a European Competitiveness Fund. According to the Commission itself, EU budget spending is currently fragmented over too many programmes that often have limited coordinated strategic direction and tend to be incredibly complicated for the beneficiaries.

    In light of the above:

    • 1.What priority will the Commission give to environmental issues in the MFF and the European Competitiveness Fund?
    • 2.How does the Commission plan to balance the desire for competitiveness with the rules and regulations needed to ensure sustainable and environmentally friendly growth?
    • 3.According to the Commission, which programmes should be ‘revised’ to make the EU budget fit for purpose?

    Submitted: 17.2.2025

    Last updated: 27 February 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News