NewzIntel.com

    • Checkout Page
    • Contact Us
    • Default Redirect Page
    • Frontpage
    • Home-2
    • Home-3
    • Lost Password
    • Member Login
    • Member LogOut
    • Member TOS Page
    • My Account
    • NewzIntel Alert Control-Panel
    • NewzIntel Latest Reports
    • Post Views Counter
    • Privacy Policy
    • Public Individual Page
    • Register
    • Subscription Plan
    • Thank You Page

Category: Europe

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Statement from the Attorney General on the case of Axel Rudakubana

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    The Attorney General Lord Hermer KC has released a statement following a request to review Axel Rudakubana’s sentence under the Unduly Lenient Sentence scheme.

    The Attorney General Lord Hermer KC said:

    The senseless and barbaric murder of three young girls in Southport last summer shocked our nation.

    No words come anywhere close to expressing the brutality and horror in this case. 

    It was understandable that we received multiple requests to review the sentence under the Unduly Lenient Sentence scheme – which is designed to identify and remedy gross errors made by judges.

    After careful consideration of independent legal advice and consultation with leading criminal barristers and the Crown Prosecution Service, I have concluded that this case cannot properly be referred to the Court of Appeal.

    No one would want the families to be put through an unnecessary further court process where there is no realistic legal basis for an increased sentence. 

    The 52-year sentence imposed by the judge was the second longest sentence imposed by the courts in English history.

    Rudakubana will likely never be released and will spend the rest of his life in jail.

    The Government have set out the next steps that must now take place to ensure that these awful murders will be a line in the sand.

    My thoughts today are with the friends and families of Bebe, Elsie, and Alice, as well as the other victims – your memories will not be forgotten.

    Share this page

    The following links open in a new tab

    • Share on Facebook (opens in new tab)
    • Share on Twitter (opens in new tab)

    Updates to this page

    Published 14 February 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom –

    February 15, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Wyden Releases Draft Bill to Secure Americans’ Communications Against Foreign Surveillance Demands

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator Ron Wyden (D-Ore)
    February 14, 2025
    Bill Fixes Loopholes in Flawed U.S. Law Used to Demand Apple Build Backdoors for iCloud Accounts, Putting Americans’ Security at Risk
    Washington, D.C. – U.S. Senator Ron Wyden, D-Ore., today released a discussion draft of the Global Trust in American Online Services Act to secure Americans’ communications against abusive foreign demands to weaken the security of communications services and software used by Americans.
    The bill reforms the CLOUD Act, which permits foreign governments to make surveillance demands directly of U.S. companies rather than going through the U.S. legal system.
    “Foreign governments shouldn’t get a cheat code to undermine the security of American technology,” Wyden said. “My bill would fix the loopholes in the CLOUD Act, and modernize the law so American allies can request the information they need to investigate serious crimes without sacrificing the security of Americans’ communications services.”
    According to news reports, the United Kingdom issued a secret order to Apple last month, directing the company to weaken the encryption protecting its iCloud backup service. The U.K. was apparently able to secretly issue the order to Apple, rather than seeking assistance from the Department of Justice (DOJ) because of the CLOUD Act. Wyden and Representative Andy Biggs, R-Ariz., urged Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard to demand the U.K. withdraw its order in a letter on Thursday.
    The CLOUD Act, enacted in 2018, enables foreign countries to obtain data directly from U.S. firms, bypassing the U.S. legal system once they enter into an agreement with the Justice Department. However, the CLOUD Act failed to require foreign countries to adopt the same due process requirements long guaranteed under U.S. law, enabling foreign governments to demand that U.S. technology companies weaken the security of products used by Americans and putting global trust in U.S. firms at risk.
    The Global Trust in American Online Services Act addresses serious flaws in the CLOUD Act, to ensure that U.S. technology companies can continue to maintain the trust of their international customers, and that the U.S. can compete globally as a safe place for data. The legislation would:
    Prevent foreign governments from using the CLOUD Act to require U.S. providers to adopt specific designs for products, reduce the security of a product, or deliver malware to a customer.
    Allow U.S. providers to challenge foreign CLOUD Act orders in U.S. federal court.
    Require Congressional approval of CLOUD Act agreements rather than the current disapproval mechanism, and enable oversight by requiring that each agreement sunset after five years rather than lasting indefinitely.
    The draft bill is available here. A one-page summary of the bill is available here.

    MIL OSI USA News –

    February 15, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Polish Deputy Prime Minister Wladyslaw Kosiniak-Kamysz Hold Joint Media Availability

    Source: United States Department of Defense

    UNKNOWN: Good morning, everyone. Welcome to the press conference in the Ministry of National Defense. We have here Deputy Prime Minister, Minister of National Defense Wladyslaw Kosiniak-Kamysz and Secretary of Defense of the United States, Mr. Pete Hegseth. Deputy Prime Minister, can you please take the floor?

    DEPUTY PRIME MINISTER KOSINIAK-KAMYSZ: Good morning. Good morning, everyone. It is a great moment. It is a great moment for myself, for my wife, together with whom we are hosting Secretary of Defense of the United States together with his wife. Welcome very cordially. Thank you for choosing Poland as the first venue of your first official bilateral visit, that you decided to come to Poland.

    It is a testimony to our partnership. It is also a testimony to our friendship and shared strategy of security for the United States, for Poland, Europe and the whole world. That is our great duty. It is a great honor for myself to host Secretary Pete Hegseth to Poland today and talk about the most important challenges related to the security of Poland, the United States, Europe and the world.

    Thank you very much for a very good discussion. Well, first, we had a [Inaudible] and then we had a bilateral meeting with delegations to talk about our alliance and the North Atlantic Treaty Alliance. Polish American Alliance has never been as strong as it is today, and we can do everything possible to make it even stronger overnight.

    And this is what we agreed on, that we will have a joint investment and shared security guarantees, as well as increasing capabilities. Poland is a country that understands threats, that it can see it, and we can sense it. We have our own history and we know how it happened, that in our country, in our beloved homeland, the war was waged. We were deprived of our own independence for years.

    For years, we didn’t also have the self-determination capacity when we restored it. We know how important security is, how important freedom is and peace. The values that bring us together need strength. Freedom needs strength. The peace also needs strength. Security takes a lot of strength, and that strength is not possible without spendings, without the money that we have to spend on security, without increasing our capabilities and investment in our armed forces, the alliance and the society.

    We know this perfectly well and this is something that we definitely share. Thank you very much for that. Poland is an example of such a such a country and Secretary of Defense gave an example of Poland in public in Brussels, that Poland is actually an example how to care for our own security and the allied security.

    Because whatever we do, the protection of our borders, five percent of defense spending is modernization and transformation of the Polish armed forces, the acquisition of the state-of-the-art equipment from our strategic partner in the area of defense, which is the United States and this is an absolute priority for our country.

    Everyone in Poland absolutely accepts that and agrees with that. We want to thank our taxpayers, thanks to whom we are able to execute that great plan of the transformation of the Polish Armed Forces. Without them, it would not be possible. We can do that, thanks to them, because they contribute to this and they understand this.

    Poland is a country that understands that the greater defense spendings are definitely a must. Europe must spend more. This is the message with which Secretary of Defense came to the meeting of defense ministers of the alliance. Well, we must spend more to protect our territory better and the United States wants to cooperate.

    And the United States will do everything possible to be together for the alliance to be stronger and stronger, but Europe also must demonstrate its contribution. We understand this perfectly well and we are true to our commitments. We are true to our allied obligations. We were together in Iraq. We were together in Afghanistan.

    We were in different anti-terror missions. After the terrorist attacks in the United States, we were the first country that was ready to support the US and we continue to do so. We will support the United States. We are a steadfast and loyal ally and thank you very much for the presence of the American troops in Poland.

    It is incredibly important for us. It is crucial and it gives us a sense of security and it really provides tangible security. We want to thank for every single American serviceman and servicewomen training together with Polish troops for giving us strengths and capabilities and our power. You are very much welcome here.

    Come to us. This is your home, and you will always be treated like that because it is a great privilege for us and a great pleasure. I am also very happy with our conversation about the future, further spendings that we want to make in the United States, further acquisitions. We will definitely continue that effort.

    We also want to develop the cooperation of our defense industries. We also talked about that investment joint venture, Polish American Investment to increase the capabilities for our production, especially the capacity to produce munitions and the capacity for armament, production that is not sufficient in Europe.

    Europe must wake up. Europe must invest in defense industry and we want to create joint venture companies with the United States to be able to use these resources better. Poland can and should be a hub of infrastructure for maintenance, for economy and businesses of the United States. Our strategy is to be like a transatlantic bond, bringing the United States and Europe together because Poland is best prepared to do that and Poland understands best all the actions that are undertaken by the United States today.

    And I think that Poland has very good awareness of the situation. After this conversation, I am absolutely convinced that it is the case. We want to be a service hub that will be used for the American equipment used by our allies along the eastern border of NATO. We also talked about illegal migration that we stop at the Polish Belarusian border.

    We talked about the challenges the United States is also facing to this extent and very good information that I want to share with you. You know that there is the review of different spendings in the United States, that there are different executive orders that were issued by President Trump and the objective is to review the justification of the spendings.

    But there is something as foreign military financing. This is the fund that is used to modernize, for example, the Polish armed forces and we use it, billions of dollars. And that executive order of President Trump about freezing the funding of different programs to support modernization and transformation, they do not apply to Poland.

    Thank you very much, Secretary of Defense for the decisions about the that, for a very clear presentation of the case. It is a great example and we are ironclad partners. We are friends for better and for worse, for good times and worse times. We are together with each other, Poland and the United States.

    The United States and Poland are true and loyal friends and our cooperation will be even at a higher level.

    UNKNOWN: Thank you. Now, Pete Hegseth, the Secretary of Defense of the United States.

    SECRETARY HEGSETH: Well, thank you, Mr. Deputy Prime Minister. Thank you for your incredibly strong words, which I echo and concur completely. Our friendship, our bond is ironclad and we came here specifically to reinforce that. I also want to thank your wife for being a part of this as well today, and your entire delegation.

    The warmth of the Polish people is very, very clear. It is a privilege to be here and I do want to emphasize that it’s quite intentional that our first European bilateral is right here in Poland. The symbolism is not lost, in fact, it is intentional. We see Poland as the model ally on the continent, willing to invest not just in their defense, but in our shared defense and the defense of the continent.

    Our relationship is strong and growing stronger every day. Poland, a strategic frontline partner on NATO’s eastern flank. Poland, a staunch US ally. Poland, a, as I said, model ally, not only in words. Words are cheap, but in deed and in actions. Poland leads by example, on a lot of things, including defense spending, building up Polish military readiness.

    Yesterday in Brussels, we both talked a lot about spending and the need for hard power. Diplomacy is important. Talk is important. Negotiations are important. But ultimately, beans and bullets and tanks and helicopters and hard power still matters. Poland understands that and so do we. They’re exceeding NATO burden sharing commitments and we’re looking for even more ways to partner.

    You mentioned joint ventures, strategic partnerships. We are open and look forward to further solidifying how we can work together as it pertains to our defense industrial bases. We want to achieve peace through strength together. Deterrence, that defense industrial base, that’s Apaches, F-35s, HIMARS, Patriots, you name it. The more you have, the stronger we are.

    The more we can cooperate with those systems, the more interoperable our capabilities are, the better. I also want to thank you and the Polish people for the outstanding support of our forces that are deployed here. We have over 8,000 American troops in Poland. I had a chance to spend the morning with some of some of those US troops.

    We ran the streets of Warsaw this morning in the snow. I’m from Minnesota, so I was used to it. It was about 25 to 30 US Soldiers and Marines, had a chance to talk to them while we ran and did push-ups. And I asked them about their experience here in Poland and some worked directly with troops, others worked in military sales.

    Some work in POW and MIA remains recovery still. Each one of them had nothing but gushing compliments for the Polish people, for the Polish military, for the amount of support that they receive, for the true partnership, for the eagerness with which Polish troops work alongside American troops. We’ve seen plenty of examples across the globe as the United States of America, or where you work with allies who sometimes you wish wanted it just as much as we did.

    That’s not a problem we have with Polish troops or here in Poland, and we thank you and we thank your military for the immense amount of support they provide to ours. We also, investments by Poland makes it easier for us to be here as well. Generous contributions from the Polish Treasury for infrastructure and logistics support for our troops to be here reduces the US taxpayer burden.

    I know that’s something that President Trump worked with Poland on his first four years in office. We will continue to do that together as well. The level of partnership, just to underscore here, is unmatched in Europe. The common bond between our forces is unlike others in Europe. We have a shared warrior ethos, which we talked about, something I’m emphasizing, we’re emphasizing at Donald Trump’s Department of Defense.

    We’re ready, we’re lethal, we’re capable and we want to reinvest the warrior spirit. We want to rebuild our military and reestablish deterrence. I heard the exact same things from you and from your leadership in our bilateral meeting, which is incredibly encouraging. No truer friend, no tougher foe than the Polish soldier.

    As I mentioned, we saw it in Iraq, we saw it in Afghanistan and it goes all the way back to World War II and Market Garden. The Polish military has stood alongside America and we stand alongside you. So, thank you again for that robust partnership, for being a friend around the table of nations. Yes, at NATO, we are all friends, but sometimes you look out and see those that say we are with you when there are tough conversations to be had and you were, and I know you will be. We look forward to leading those conversations and ensuring our deeds match our words, and your friendship is incredibly valued.

    On behalf of the American people, thank you for welcoming us. It’s an honor to be here, sir. Thank you.

    UNKNOWN: Now we have time for four short questions. The first question, Jan Piotrowski, TVN 24.

    Q: — Hegseth. Sir, just recently you’ve ruled out the possibility of restoring Ukrainian pre-2014 borders, but do you believe that there is a possibility to restore the border as it was before the full-scale invasion back in February 2022? Thank you.

    SECRETARY HEGSETH: Thank you for the question, sir. I think anything is possible. I, as the Secretary of Defense, have a specific lane of the portfolio of what America is representing inside these negotiations. So, my job today and in Brussels was to introduce realism to the conversation, the reality that returning to 2014 borders as part of a negotiated settlement is unlikely.

    The reality of US troops in Ukraine is unlikely. The reality of Ukraine membership in NATO as a part of a negotiated settlement, unlikely. And I stand by the comments that I made on that first day in the Ukraine contact group and that’s for all the press out there who it’s difficult for them to understand that.

    We stand by the statements we made in reality about the status of US forces or Ukraine’s involvement in NATO and the unlikely nature of that. That said, I would never put constraints around what the president of the United States would be willing to negotiate with the sovereign leaders of both Russia and Ukraine.

    I’m not here to put a left and right limit on those discussions. We’ve been here just simply to introduce realism into the expectations of our NATO allies to incentivize the opportunity for that negotiation. So, what those borders ultimately look like, sir, remains to be seen and I think is part of the discussion that would be had between our President, Zelenskyy, Putin and likely Europe’s involvement in those discussions as well.

    Thank you, sir.

    Q: Mr. Secretary, are US troops in Ukraine on the table? Vice President Vance says it is. And [untranslated], under what condition would Poland send forces to Ukraine as part of a peacekeeping mission?

    SECRETARY HEGSETH: Well, the president has said multiple times inside his framework for discussions of this, and I just want to lay out that these are not comments or statements that I make in a vacuum or make without direct consultation with our team. So, President Trump’s national security team, from Mike Waltz to the vice president to Secretary of State Marco Rubio, we’re all on the same page.

    And our job is to ensure that our commander in chief, the president of the United States, has the full spectrum of options to bring this conflict, to bring the killing to an end, to an end. And my message to the Ukraine contact group was I do not believe as a part of those negotiations that US troops will be on the ground.

    You can say that and I believe that to be true. That’s what President Trump has said. That is what he has emphasized, that this is a for Europeans to resolve alongside Ukraine and Russia and that US boots will not be on the ground. Again, negotiations happen, the president has latitude and what happens in those negotiations is his prerogative because he is the American people’s representative on the world stage.

    There’s no daylight in those conversations. There’s no daylight between myself and the vice president. We are collective advocates on behalf of the president. He reserves the right to have any option as he discusses troops and partnerships and investment opportunities and front-line limits. Those are all what President Trump will negotiate with his counterparts.

    DEPUTY PRIME MINISTER KOSINIAK-KAMYSZ: [Inaudible] just started. I would like to thank for this question. The negotiation, which President Trump chairs, is just the first step. We’ve talked about it. Well, some thought that this is the finale, that this is the end. Well, it was just launched and it is worthwhile not only in Poland, but also in Ukraine across the world to realize.

    And what just was said by Pete Hegseth, what will be the finale, it is to be seen. It is in front of us. What is for sure, we need to be strong and united as allies and this is what we have between Poland and the United States. Poland has been doing a lot to support Ukraine. We’ve been doing that from the first day.

    Without the Polish participation, we could not be able to send assistance to Ukraine. 95 percent of hardware humanitarian assistance goes through logistical hub in Poland, and this has been happening for three years. We’ve been securing this. We’ve involved our forces which are protecting this process. We would like to thank our allies from the US, other countries, that they are supporting this transfer process and protection process of the donations which have been transferred to Ukraine.

    And this is the role for Poland, of the logistical support in many issues rather than sending our troops to Ukraine, what we can do for sure. And I think we’re going to do it together soon to send our companies, joint venture companies or joint venture partnerships to Ukraine. The companies investing in the defense industry also using various capabilities to elevate the level of security of Ukraine and the eastern flank of NATO developing these possibilities.

    If we invest in Ukraine, the United States, Europe and Poland, this is a great guarantee of security. I think it is also in the strategy that the United States is presenting broadly and this is also going to be a subject of the discussion. So, our role as a logistical support that we’ve been doing, it is very important.

    Without that, we could not support fighting Ukraine and the peace in Ukraine.

    UNKNOWN: Thank you very much. Next question, there will be two more questions.

    Q: Mr. Secretary, would the US consider lowering troops number in eastern Europe as a part of the deal with Russia, or would it consider giving up its permanent military presence in Poland?

    SECRETARY HEGSETH: Well, I will state definitively as I did in Brussels, that America is committed to the NATO alliance. Our message has been – and as we discussed, we believe, heard loud and clear that member countries in NATO need to spend more, need to invest more, need to have more skin in the game for their collective defense.

    That is not just a suggestion from the United States of America, that is a direct request, which we will follow up on as a reflection of their desire and commitment to actually defend their own backyard. That’s a serious aspect of NATO becoming a serious alliance in the future. As I mentioned, you can have as many flags as you want, but if you don’t have hard power, you’re not an actual alliance.

    And unfortunately, our adversaries look at that and they judge accordingly. Right now, on the continent, the American presence is robust and it has been. And that partnership is real and important. And the troops that we have here in Poland is an investment in that, is a recognition of that. And frankly, the invitation we receive here, if anything, would make me want to welcome more troops to Poland, as the Secretary of Defense.

    That’s not a policy statement. That’s just how I feel. The welcome is warm. At the same time, our president is in the middle of negotiations, but he has recognized, as have I, that American presence on the continent is important to deter Vladimir Putin and send that signal of solidarity. But I think it’s really important what the deputy prime minister said.

    This is the beginning of negotiations. I’m not here to set the terms of how my president of the United States will debate this. I’m here to give him my best military advice alongside him of what may or may not be most useful to reach the peaceful end state that we want. From my perspective, the American troop levels on the continent are important.

    What happens five or 10 or 15 years from now is part of a larger discussion that reflects the threat level, America’s posture, our needs around the globe, but most significantly, the capability of European countries to step up. And that’s why our message is so stark to our European allies, now is the time to invest because you can’t make an assumption that America’s presence will last forever.

    America has to stare down a lot of threats to include, as I mentioned, the Communist Chinese and if that’s the case, then countries like Poland and others will continue to step up. But as of today, we are very proud of our partnership in Europe. Thank you.

    UNKNOWN: [Inaudible] Fox News [Inaudible].

    Q: — Fox News. These questions are for both you gentlemen. Do you believe the warnings from NATO allies that allowing Putin to keep Ukrainian territory, will one day embolden him to launch future attacks, perhaps even invade the eastern flank of the NATO alliance? Is this Yalta 2.0 or perhaps even Munich 2.0? Do you trust Vladimir Putin to live up to any potential agreement?

    And finally, in light of the Russian drone attack on Chernobyl last night, should there be a ceasefire during these negotiations? Thank you.

    SECRETARY HEGSETH: Do you want to go? Go ahead.

    DEPUTY PRIME MINISTER KOSINIAK-KAMYSZ: Well, what I believe is the strength which protects us from evil. On the strong, we are able to defend ourselves from Putin on the strength the terrorists in our freedom. Our freedom will not be protected by beautiful words, by diplomatic meetings. Our freedom and independence will be only defended and protected by the strength of our alliance.

    This is the only thing that can protect us, nothing else. And we’ll never have a calm day. There are no calm days across the world. There are only those who have slept the last 30 days, years, because they thought that they lived in the calm world. The world will never be calm. The world will also always require from us activity.

    We always need to invest that. We have to remember that Putin or other dictator may come, which can threaten our security. It never ends. This is what history teaches us. And I think it was a bit too good for us. For some, it was too good. Maybe they didn’t have the experiences that we’ve had in Poland, that they just slept over this time.

    And right now, it’s time to wake them up and the voice which came from Brussels, from Pete Hegseth, and more spending was finally heard. We’ve been talking about, we’ve been showing that and we need it. Not to replace the American troops in Europe because without them the world and Europe will not be saved.

    But to maintain them to keep them, Europe must show that they want it, not in the words but in the deeds and many European countries is already doing that, but many more needs to do it and we want to do it. So, there is no other security guarantee than your strength.

    SECRETARY HEGSETH: Well, I appreciate those words and I agree. First, your second question on a ceasefire, I think the president has stated that that could be part of a good faith aspect of the beginning of negotiations, which the president’s goal is to stop the killing and the violence and the death. Part of doing that could be a ceasefire, and that could be a welcome development.

    As far as Vladimir Putin being emboldened, he’s going to declare victory no matter what. You can expect that no matter what the outcome is. Thankfully, the bravery of the Ukrainians and allies that came alongside them, especially early in the war, deterred and defeated Vladimir Putin from achieving what he wanted, which was all of Ukraine.

    So, now you have a more defined front line and whether he declares victory or not will be up to him. Whether he’s emboldened speaks exactly to what the deputy prime minister talked about and NATO’s willingness to step up. If NATO’s response to this situation is to truly increase capabilities, truly increase inputs and spending to think more like Poland, to think more like the Baltics who are closer to the threat and recognize the reality of the threat, then I don’t think Vladimir Putin will be emboldened by this outcome.

    It will be a recognition that the collective ability of the west to deter him was something that actually happened. Is there trust there? No. I mean, you don’t have to operate under a position of trust in order to negotiate a deal. But again, I’m the Secretary of Defense, it’s not my job to read the mind of Vladimir Putin.

    President Trump will be the one at the table with Zelenskyy and Putin. You don’t have to trust somebody in order to negotiate with them. But as Ronald Reagan said, if you don’t trust, you need to verify and so there will be a follow up and ensuring that whatever peace is negotiated is a lasting and enduring peace.

    UNKNOWN: Thank you, gentlemen. Thank you, prime minister and secretary.

    DEPUTY PRIME MINISTER KOSINIAK-KAMYSZ: Thank you one more time.

    MIL OSI USA News –

    February 15, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: Fairfax India Amends Credit Agreement

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION TO U.S. NEWSWIRE SERVICES OR FOR DISSEMINATION IN THE UNITED STATES

    (Note: All dollar amounts in this news release are expressed in U.S. dollars, except as otherwise noted).

    TORONTO, Feb. 14, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Fairfax India Holdings Corporation (“Fairfax India” or the “Company”) (TSX: FIH.U) announces that, it has amended its existing credit agreement (“Credit Agreement”) with a syndicate of lenders to (i) provide for the issuance of letters of credit under its revolving credit facility (for the term of the Credit Agreement), and (ii) increase the borrowing limit of its revolving credit facility from $175.0 million to $250.0 million, which shall be reduced to $175.0 million over a period of approximately eighteen months, in accordance with the terms of the Credit Agreement. All other terms of the Credit Agreement remain unchanged. At December 31, 2024, the revolving credit facility was undrawn.

    As previously disclosed, the Company, through its wholly owned subsidiary, has entered into an agreement to acquire an additional 10% equity interest in Bangalore International Airport Limited (“BIAL”) from Siemens Project Ventures GmbH, part of Siemens Financial Services (“Siemens”) for, in aggregate, $255.0 million (the “Purchase Price”). The Purchase Price is payable in three installments, with the initial installment ($84.2 million) to be paid on the closing date of the BIAL transaction, which as previously announced, is to occur in Q1 2025. The second and third installments (collectively, the “Deferred Purchase Price”) are to be paid on August 31, 2025 (as to $94.4 million) and July 31, 2026 (as to $76.5 million), respectively. The Company’s wholly owned subsidiary is required to deliver on the closing of the BIAL transaction a letter of credit in favour of Siemens representing the Deferred Purchase Price, being, in aggregate, $170.9 million. The Siemens letter of credit expires on September 30, 2026. The amendments to the Company’s Credit Agreement are intended to facilitate the issuance of the letter of credit to Siemens on the closing of the BIAL transaction while ensuring that the Company maintains its liquidity for the period the letter of credit is outstanding.

    About Fairfax India

    Fairfax India is an investment holding company whose objective is to achieve long-term capital appreciation, while preserving capital, by investing in public and private equity securities and debt instruments in India and Indian businesses or other businesses with customers, suppliers or business primarily conducted in, or dependent on, India.

    For further information, contact:       John Varnell, Vice President, Corporate Affairs
    (416) 367-4755
         

    This press release may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of applicable securities legislation. Forward-looking statements may relate to the company’s or an Indian Investment’s future outlook and anticipated events or results and may include statements regarding the financial position, business strategy, growth strategy, budgets, operations, financial results, taxes, dividends, plans and objectives of the company. Particularly, statements regarding future results, performance, achievements, prospects or opportunities of the company, an Indian Investment, or the Indian market are forward-looking statements. In some cases, forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “plans”, “expects” or “does not expect”, “is expected”, “budget”, “scheduled”, “estimates”, “forecasts”, “intends”, “anticipates” or “does not anticipate” or “believes”, or variations of such words and phrases or state that certain actions, events or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “might”, “will” or “will be taken”, “occur” or “be achieved”. 

    Forward-looking statements are based on our opinions and estimates as of the date of this press release, and they are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties, assumptions and other factors that may cause the actual results, level of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements, including but not limited to the following factors: oil price risk; geographic concentration of investments; foreign currency fluctuation; volatility of the Indian securities markets; investments may be made in foreign private businesses where information is unreliable or unavailable; valuation methodologies involve subjective judgments; financial market fluctuations; pace of completing investments; minority investments; reliance on key personnel and risks associated with the Investment Advisory Agreement; disruption of the company’s information technology systems; lawsuits; use of leverage; significant ownership by Fairfax may adversely affect the market price of the subordinate voting shares; weather risk; taxation risks; emerging markets; MLI; economic risk; trading price of subordinate voting shares relative to book value per share risk; and economic disruptions from the after-effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and the conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East. Additional risks and uncertainties are described in the company’s annual information form dated March 8, 2024 which is available on SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.ca and on the company’s website at www.fairfaxindia.ca. These factors and assumptions are not intended to represent a complete list of the factors and assumptions that could affect the company. These factors and assumptions, however, should be considered carefully.

    Although the company has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in forward-looking statements, there may be other factors that cause results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. There can be no assurance that such statements will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. The company does not undertake to update any forward-looking statements contained herein, except as required by applicable securities laws.

    The MIL Network –

    February 15, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: WATCH: Senator Reverend Warnock Underscores Importance of Lowering Health Care Costs in Speech Opposing RFK Nomination to Lead HHS  

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator Reverend Raphael Warnock – Georgia

    WATCH: Senator Reverend Warnock Underscores Importance of Lowering Health Care Costs in Speech Opposing RFK Nomination to Lead HHS  

    On Wednesday evening, Senator Reverend Warnock held the Senate floor for nearly an hour to bring attention to the danger of Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s nomination to lead the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)

    During his speech, Senator Reverend Warnock highlighted Mr. Kennedy’s refusal to support lowering health care premiums and inconsistent views on supporting low-income Georgians’ access to coverage

    Senator Reverend Warnock also addressed Mr. Kennedy’s disturbing comments and long-held beliefs that threaten health care costs, quality, and access for Americans

    Senator Reverend Warnock also used the speech to highlight personal stories from Georgians who would be impacted by Mr. Kennedy’s potential poor stewardship of HHS

    Senator Reverend Warnock: “Mr. Kennedy won’t work to lower Georgians’ health care costs or increase access to health care for my constituents who are caught right now in the health care coverage gap”

    Above: Senator Reverend Warnock speaks on the Senate floor in opposition to Mr. Kennedy’s HHS nomination

    Washington, D.C. – On Wednesday evening, U.S. Senator Reverend Raphael Warnock (D-GA) delivered a speech on the floor of the U.S. Senate highlighting his opposition to Robert F. Kennedy Jr., President Trump’s nominee to be the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

    During his nearly hour-long speech, Senator Warnock highlighted how Mr. Kennedy would not stand in the way of Washington Republicans’ attempt to raise Georgians’ health care premiums to pay for tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans. The Senator highlighted Mr. Kennedy’s inconsistent positions on providing Georgians’ access to health care.

    “I asked him, yes or no, if he supports Congress extending these [premium] tax credits, which lower Americans’ premiums, something he told me was a priority for him [during their private meeting]. Suddenly, Mr. Kennedy could not give me a yes or no answer,” said Senator Reverend Warnock.“I wonder why?

    “He told me in private that he cared about health care. He said he was aware that these tax credits were set to expire at the end of the year,” continued the Senator.“He said he wanted to lower health care costs. When I asked him whether he would support Congress extending these tax credits, the crusader, all of a sudden, became a politician and couldn’t give me a yes or no answer. That’s not a good sign. It’s a pretty simple question to the nominee to run the federal agency tasked with protecting the health of all Americans, do you support lowering health care premiums and keeping millions of people insured? That question, apparently, was a bit too challenging for Mr. Kennedy, so if a nominee to run the Department of Health and Human Services cannot tell me if he supports preventing Georgians’ health care costs from spiking… I cannot support his nomination.”

    Watch Senator Warnock’s speech HERE.

    Below key excerpts from Senator Warnock’s speech:

    “Mr. President,

    “I rise today in strong opposition to the nomination of Robert F. Kennedy Jr. To lead the Department of Health and Human Services.”

    “It’s no overstatement for me to say that it’s hard for me to imagine a nominee less qualified that would actually be presented for the job of HHS secretary. Robert F. Kennedy, not only does he not pass muster, this is not even close. I still can’t believe we’re even having this discussion. He is a conspiracy theorist who is so focused on his conspiracy theories, when you think of what we need the HHS secretary to do, Robert F. Kennedy is a hazard to our health.”

    “Certainly we can do better than this. He’s just manifestly unqualified. I don’t know how else to put it.”

    […]

    “Mr. Kennedy won’t work to lower Georgians’ health care costs or increase access to health care for my constituents who are caught right now in the health care coverage gap. I’m so proud that in my first few months in the Senate, I was able to play a critical role in passing the American Rescue Plan, which, among other things, lowered Georgians’ health care premiums by hundreds of dollars on average. It is, quite frankly, the kind of thing that makes this job worth it to me. Being able to help ordinary folks.”

    “That tax cut literally helped bring health care into reach for tens of thousands of Georgians and millions of Americans. These tax cuts are so critical that the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office said that the number of Americans without health care would grow by 3.8 million in just one year, in just one year, 3.8 million without health care if the premium subsidies that we now enjoy were allowed to expire. We know that that would impact thousands of Georgians who have only recently been able to receive health care coverage.”

    “If these tax credits are allowed to expire, a 45-year-old in Georgia with $62,000 annual income would see premiums go up by $1,414 a year. A 60-year-old couple in Georgia with an $80,000 annual income would see their premiums go up by a staggering $18,157 a year. Can you imagine someone making $80,000 a year, 60-year-old couple, and all of a sudden their health insurance for the year goes up by more than $18,000? We know what that is. That’s the difference between having health care coverage and not having it at all.”

    “Nearly one-third of Americans have less than $500 in savings in their bank account, and so these folks don’t have that kind of extra dough. They don’t have that kind of extra cash on hand to pay for something that is vitally necessary, and we don’t know, we never know when we will really need our health insurance.”

    “So, every single day, as we watch the games that Washington politicians play — for me, this is no game. I often say that if we would center ordinary people, we have a chance at getting the public policy right. If we will center people rather than politics, we might manage to get the right policy.”

    […]

    “I asked the nominee for HHS, what do you think about this? Mr. Kennedy told me when I met him privately in my office that he wanted to work with President Trump to lower health care premiums. I said, good.”

    “That’s why I was deeply troubled when I questioned Mr. Kennedy on his support for these tax credits in his hearing in front of the Senate Finance committee, I asked him, yes or no, Mr. Kennedy, are you aware that the premium subsidies that help save Georgians and average of $531 a month are set to expire at the end of the year? He said, yes, he is aware. Then I asked him, yes or no, if he supports Congress extending these tax credits, which lower Americans’ premiums, something he told me was a priority for him. Suddenly, Mr. Kennedy could not give me a yes or no answer. I wonder why?”

    “He told me in private that he cared about health care. He said he was aware that these tax credits were set to expire at the end of the year. He said he wanted to lower health care costs. When I asked him whether he would support Congress extending these tax credits, the crusader all of a sudden became a politician and couldn’t give me a yes or no answer. That’s not a good sign.”

    “It’s a pretty simple question to the nominee to run the federal agency tasked with protecting the health of all Americans, do you support lowering health care premiums and keeping millions of people insured? That question apparently was a bit too challenging for Mr. Kennedy, so if a nominee to run the Department of Health and Human Services cannot tell me if he supports preventing Georgians’ health care costs from spiking and keeping people like Cassie Cox on her health care plan, I cannot support his nomination.”

    “I don’t work for him. I don’t work for the insurance companies. I work for Cassie Cox and the other Georgians like her.”

    MIL OSI USA News –

    February 15, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: WATCH: Ahead of Potential Workforce Cuts, Senator Reverend Warnock Spotlights Importance of the CDC in Speech Opposing RFK Nomination to Lead HHS

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator Reverend Raphael Warnock – Georgia

    WATCH: Ahead of Potential Workforce Cuts, Senator Reverend Warnock Spotlights Importance of the CDC in Speech Opposing RFK Nomination to Lead HHS

    On Wednesday evening, Senator Reverend Warnock gave nearly an hour-long Senate floor speech opposing Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to lead the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)
    Senator Reverend Warnock’s speech came just a day before the Trump Administration announced a 10 percent cut to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) staff, roughly 1,300 employees
    During his speech, Senator Reverend Warnock highlighted the importance of the Georgia-based CDC and the agency’s work to protect the nation from health, safety, and security threats
    The speech follows the recent news that the Trump Administration directed federal health agencies to pause public health communications with hospitals, doctors, and the public
    The Senator’s work to champion the CDC continues the legacy of Georgia Republican Senator Isakson, who worked to expand and invest in the CDC
    Senator Reverend Warnock: “As a senator from the great state of Georgia, I’m very proud that I represent the Georgia-based Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. […] The CDC does lifesaving work to control disease outbreaks, to ensure our food and our water are safe, to keep our brave servicemembers abroad safe, and to prevent leading causes of death such as heart disease, cancer, stroke, and diabetes”

    Above: Senator Reverend Warnock  speaks in Defense of the CDC
    Washington, D.C. – On Wednesday evening, U.S. Senator Reverend Raphael Warnock (D-GA) delivered a speech on the floor of the U.S. Senate highlighting his opposition to Robert F. Kennedy Jr., President Trump’s nominee to be the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). During his nearly hour-long speech, Senator Warnock highlighted Mr. Kennedy’s lack of qualifications and troubling conspiracy theories about the Georgia-based Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), which could hurt the state’s economy and hinder research from bird flu, to maternal health, to cancer.
    Senator Warnock’s speech was just a day before the Trump Administration announced a 10 percent reduction of CDC employees. Terminating nearly 1,300 employees, which is part of the administration’s plans to get rid of all probationary employees. Senator Warnock remains committed to using any tools at his disposal to stop cuts to programs and agencies that impact the lives of everyday Americans.
    “The moment at which you put the CDC and Nazi death camps in the same statement, and you’re the secretary nominee for HHS, Houston, Georgia, America, we have a problem,” said Senator Reverend Warnock.“And that problem is Robert Kennedy.
    Last year, the Senator visited the CDC in Atlanta, Georgia for the first time as Senator to learn about the agency’s efforts to protect public health, including work to combat the maternal mortality crisis and how federal funding plays a role in keeping Georgia and the country safe from infectious diseases. During Mr. Kennedy’s nomination hearing in committee, Senator Warnock spoke at length defending the importance of the CDC which employs over 10,000 hardworking Georgians.
    “Last June, I visited the CDC, carrying on the spirit of my predecessor in my seat, my friend, the late Republican Senator Johnny Isakson,” continued Senator Warnock. “Johnny Isakson was a good man. We didn’t agree on everything, but he was just a good human being. And he was a fierce advocate for the CDC. And I’m honored to carry on that tradition in his memory, because he understood, as do I, that the CDC again is saving us from so many bad things that we don’t even see. 
    The Senator highlighted that:
    For everyone one job hired at the CDC, three jobs are created. 
    Students come from all over the world to study at Georgia research institutions because of its proximity to the CDC. The Center hosts over 125,000 visitors on its campus every year. 
    The CDC invests hundreds of millions of dollars into Georgia organizations and institutions to partner on research. 
    For every dollar the CDC spends, Georgia’s economy sees $2 in growth. 
    If the CDC were a business, it’d be the 7th largest business in the state.
    Watch Senator Warnock’s speech  HERE.
    Below key excerpts from Senator Warnock’s speech:
    “Mr. President,
    “I rise today in strong opposition to the nomination of Robert F. Kennedy Jr. To lead the Department of Health and Human Services.”
    “It’s no overstatement for me to say that it’s hard for me to imagine a nominee less qualified that would actually be presented for the job of HHS secretary. Robert F. Kennedy, not only does he not pass muster, this is not even close. I still can’t believe we’re even having this discussion. He is a conspiracy theorist who is so focused on his conspiracy theories, when you think of what we need the HHS secretary to do, Robert F. Kennedy is a hazard to our health.”
    “Certainly we can do better than this. He’s just manifestly unqualified. I don’t know how else to put it.”
    […]
    “As a senator from the great state of Georgia, I’m very proud that I represent the Georgia-based Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the CDC. Which was created nearly 80 years ago to prevent the spread of malaria across our countries. The CDC does lifesaving work to control disease outbreaks, to ensure our food and our water are safe, to keep our brave servicemembers abroad, safe, and to prevent leading causes of death such as heart disease, cancer, stroke, and diabetes.” 
    […]
    “The CDC employs 10,000 Georgians and their work is so critical for every American. But in addition to that, the CDC has a great economic impact on Georgia as well. For every one job at the CDC, three jobs are created. One job at the CDC creates three jobs in the Georgia economy. […] If the CDC were a business, it would be the seventh largest business in my state.”
    […]
    “Last June, I visited the CDC, carrying on the spirit of my predecessor in my seat, my friend, the late Republican Senator Johnny Isakson. Johnny Isakson was a good man. We didn’t agree on everything, but he was just a good human being. And he was a fierce advocate for the CDC. And I’m honored to carry on that tradition in his memory, because he understood, as do I, that the CDC again is saving us from so many bad things that we don’t even see. 
    […]
    “I spoke with researchers and medical professionals who are already working to address bird flu, which possesses a danger to our poultry farmers and our grocery prices. Can I tell you, I spent time with those CDC workers, they’re not the enemy, as some have tried to paint these federal workers in recent days. Shameful.
    “They didn’t deserve to get a blanket memo encouraging them, whoever they are, no matter what job they hold, to just resign. They’re the wall. They’ve been protecting us. They’re the reason we’re able to go to sleep at night and not even think about certain things. It’s hard to get credit for saving people from the bad stuff they don’t even see.”
    […]
    “You can slice and dice these words [RFK’s past comments about the CDC] all you want. The moment at which you put the CDC and Nazi death camps in the same statement, and you’re the secretary nominee for HHS, Houston, Georgia, America, we have a problem. And that problem is Robert Kennedy.”
    “And god help us if my colleagues on the other side of the aisle cannot get past partisan politics, cannot find the courage to stand up to Donald Trump and say no to Robert Kennedy.”

    MIL OSI USA News –

    February 15, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Senators Reverend Warnock, Majority Leader Thune Reintroduce Bipartisan Legislation to Help Farmers Increase Crop Yields and Income

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator Reverend Raphael Warnock – Georgia

    Senators Reverend Warnock, Majority Leader Thune Reintroduce Bipartisan Legislation to Help Farmers Increase Crop Yields and Income

    Legislation would make agriculture technology accessible to more Georgia farmers and improve their profit margins

    Washington, D.C. — This week, U.S. Senators Reverend Raphael Warnock (D-GA), a member of the Senate Agriculture committee, and Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) reintroduced their bipartisan Promoting Precision Agriculture Act, legislation that would facilitate the further adoption of precision agriculture technologies for farmers and ranchers. The bill would encourage the government to work with the private sector to develop voluntary interconnectivity standards and prioritize the cybersecurity needed to support innovation in the agriculture industry. Precision agriculture technology helps farmers harvest the highest quality crop and cut down on wasted water, seed, and fertilizer. By making precision agriculture technology more accessible to Georgia farmers, the Senator’s legislative efforts are helping improve producers’ razor-thin profit margins.

    “Technology is an integral part of farming in the 21st century to increase crop yield and reduce waste, which would increase savings and net income,” said Senator Reverend Warnock. “It only makes sense that these technologies should work seamlessly together – just as you can easily text an Android from an iPhone. I’m glad to continue working with Leader Thune on this bipartisan legislation. We’re going to fight to get this done.”

    “Farmers and ranchers are always looking for ways to improve their operations, especially in states like South Dakota where agriculture is the backbone of our economy,” said Majority Leader Thune. “Precision agriculture harnesses the power of technology to provide real-time data that helps producers become even more efficient and productive. I’m proud that South Dakota is leading the way with this next-generation technology, and I will continue to work to ensure that producers around our country have the resources they need to reap the benefits.”

    The Promoting Precision Agriculture Act would:

    • Direct the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), in consultation with the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), to support the development of voluntary, consensus-based, industry-led interconnectivity standards, guidelines, and best practices for precision agriculture to encourage the adoption of precision agriculture technology.
    • Support the evolving demands of precision agriculture by requiring the USDA, NIST, and FCC to consider the impacts next-generation technologies will have on precision agriculture.
    • Prioritize the cybersecurity needs of precision agriculture. As advanced precision agriculture technologies become more readily available, the agriculture industry has increasingly become vulnerable to cybersecurity threats.

    MIL OSI USA News –

    February 15, 2025
  • MIL-OSI United Nations: Activities of Secretary-General in France, 10-12 February

    Source: United Nations General Assembly and Security Council

    On Monday, 10 February, the United Nations Secretary-General, António Guterres, arrived in Paris where, on Tuesday, he would attend the Artificial Intelligence (AI) Summit, co-hosted by French President Emmanuel Macron and Prime Minister Narendra Modi of India.

    On Monday evening, the Secretary-General attending a working dinner hosted by President Macron.

    On Tuesday morning, the Secretary-General delivered remarks at the AI Summit.

    He told the leaders gathered there about the growing concentration of AI capabilities in the hands of a few companies.  “While some companies and countries are racing ahead with record investments, most developing nations find themselves left out in the cold,” he said.  “This growing concentration of AI capabilities risks deepening geopolitical divides.”

    He underscored that the United Nations offers an inclusive, transparent and effective platform for AI solidarity.  Through the Global Dialogue that Member States agreed to establish last year, the Secretary-General said that we can align governance efforts around the world and reinforce their interoperability, uphold human rights in AI applications and prevent misuse.

    The UN, Mr. Guterres said, provides an inclusive forum for cooperation, complementing existing mechanisms such as the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) AI Principles, the Group of 7 (G7) and the Global Partnership on AI — as well as regional efforts by the African Union, European Union, the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) and the Council of Europe.  (See Press Release SG/SM/22548.)

    Prior to attending the Summit, the Secretary-General attended a working breakfast hosted by French Foreign Minister Jean-Noël Barrot.  They discussed a wide-ranging set of issues, including the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, the work of the UN peacekeeping forces in southern Lebanon, the situation in the eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo, the war in Ukraine and, of course, the Artificial Intelligence Summit.

    The Secretary-General also had a bilateral meeting with Alain Berset, the Secretary-General of the Council of Europe.  They discussed the cooperation between their two organizations.

    On Wednesday, prior to leaving Paris for Addis Ababa to attend the African Union summit, the Secretary-General visited the headquarters of Reporters Sans Frontières (Reporters without Borders) where he met with the Director General of the press freedom organization, Thibaut Bruttin.

    In addressing the staff, the Secretary-General said that organizations like RSF are on the front line in the common fight for truth against fiction, for science against conspiracy, and to fight against impunity when journalists face violence and even death.

    The Secretary-General said the struggle to defend freedom of the press and the journalists themselves is essential to preserve our democracies.

    He departed then for Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

    MIL OSI United Nations News –

    February 15, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: Nokia Corporation: Repurchase of own shares on 14.02.2025

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Nokia Corporation
    Stock Exchange Release
    14 February 2025 at 22:30 EET

    Nokia Corporation: Repurchase of own shares on 14.02.2025

    Espoo, Finland – On 14 February 2025 Nokia Corporation (LEI: 549300A0JPRWG1KI7U06) has acquired its own shares (ISIN FI0009000681) as follows:

    Trading venue (MIC Code) Number of shares Weighted average price / share, EUR*
    XHEL 1,400,000 4.78
    CEUX – –
    BATE – –
    AQEU – –
    TQEX – –
    Total 1,400,000 4.78

    * Rounded to two decimals

    On 22 November 2024, Nokia announced that its Board of Directors is initiating a share buyback program to offset the dilutive effect of new Nokia shares issued to the shareholders of Infinera Corporation and certain Infinera Corporation share-based incentives. The repurchases in compliance with the Market Abuse Regulation (EU) 596/2014 (MAR), the Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1052 and under the authorization granted by Nokia’s Annual General Meeting on 3 April 2024 started on 25 November 2024 and end by 31 December 2025 and target to repurchase 150 million shares for a maximum aggregate purchase price of EUR 900 million.

    Total cost of transactions executed on 14 February 2025 was EUR 6,692,140. After the disclosed transactions, Nokia Corporation holds 249,209,658 treasury shares.

    Details of transactions are included as an appendix to this announcement.

    On behalf of Nokia Corporation

    BofA Securities Europe SA

    About Nokia
    At Nokia, we create technology that helps the world act together.

    As a B2B technology innovation leader, we are pioneering networks that sense, think and act by leveraging our work across mobile, fixed and cloud networks. In addition, we create value with intellectual property and long-term research, led by the award-winning Nokia Bell Labs which is celebrating 100 years of innovation.

    With truly open architectures that seamlessly integrate into any ecosystem, our high-performance networks create new opportunities for monetization and scale. Service providers, enterprises and partners worldwide trust Nokia to deliver secure, reliable and sustainable networks today – and work with us to create the digital services and applications of the future.

    Inquiries:

    Nokia Communications
    Phone: +358 10 448 4900
    Email: press.services@nokia.com
    Maria Vaismaa, Global Head of External Communications

    Nokia Investor Relations
    Phone: +358 931 580 507
    Email: investor.relations@nokia.com

    Attachment

    • Daily Report 2025-02-14

    The MIL Network –

    February 15, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Global: Evolving intelligent life took billions of years − but it may not have been as unlikely as many scientists predicted

    Source: The Conversation – USA – By Daniel Brady Mills, Postdoctoral Fellow in Geomicrobiology, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich

    The Sun’s distance from Earth allows it to be habitable for life. DrPixel/Moment via Getty Images

    A popular model of evolution concludes that it was incredibly unlikely for humanity to evolve on Earth, and that extraterrestrial intelligence is vanishingly rare.

    But as experts on the entangled history of life and our planet, we propose that the coevolution of life and Earth’s surface environment may have unfolded in a way that makes the evolutionary origin of humanlike intelligence a more foreseeable or expected outcome than generally thought.

    The hard-steps model

    Some of the greatest evolutionary biologists of the 20th century famously dismissed the prospect of humanlike intelligence beyond Earth.

    This view, firmly rooted in biology, independently gained support from physics in 1983 with an influential publication by Brandon Carter, a theoretical physicist.

    In 1983, Carter attempted to explain what he called a remarkable coincidence: the close approximation between the estimated lifespan of the Sun – 10 billion years – and the time Earth took to produce humans – 5 billion years, rounding up.

    Brandon Carter is a physicist at the Laboratoire Univers et Théories in Meudon, France.
    Brandon Carter/Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA

    He imagined three possibilities. In one, intelligent life like humans generally arises very quickly on planets, geologically speaking – in perhaps millions of years. In another, it typically arises in about the time it took on Earth. And in the last, he imagined that Earth was lucky – ordinarily it would take much longer, say, trillions of years for such life to form.

    Carter rejected the first possibility because life on Earth took so much longer than that. He rejected the second as an unlikely coincidence, since there is no reason the processes that govern the Sun’s lifespan – nuclear fusion – should just happen to have the same timescale as biological evolution.

    So Carter landed on the third explanation: that humanlike life generally takes much longer to arise than the time provided by the lifetime of a star.

    The Sun will likely be able to keep planets habitable for only part of its lifetime – by the time it hits 10 billion years, it will get too hot.
    NASA/JPL-Caltech

    To explain why humanlike life took so long to arise, Carter proposed that it must depend on extremely unlikely evolutionary steps, and that the Earth is extraordinarily lucky to have taken them all.

    He called these evolutionary steps hard steps, and they had two main criteria. One, the hard steps must be required for human existence – meaning if they had not happened, then humans would not be here. Two, the hard steps must have very low probabilities of occurring in the available time, meaning they usually require timescales approaching 10 billion years.

    Tracing humans’ evolutionary lineage will bring you back billions of years.

    Do hard steps exist?

    The physicists Frank Tipler and John Barrow predicted that hard steps must have happened only once in the history of life – a logic taken from evolutionary biology.

    If an evolutionary innovation required for human existence was truly improbable in the available time, then it likely wouldn’t have happened more than once, although it must have happened at least once, since we exist.

    For example, the origin of nucleated – or eukaryotic – cells is one of the most popular hard steps scientists have proposed. Since humans are eukaryotes, humanity would not exist if the origin of eukaryotic cells had never happened.

    On the universal tree of life, all eukaryotic life falls on exactly one branch. This suggests that eukaryotic cells originated only once, which is consistent with their origin being unlikely.

    In the evolutionary tree of life, organisms that have eukaryotic cells are all on the same branch, suggesting this type of cell evolved only once.
    VectorMine/iStock via Getty Images Plus

    The other most popular hard-step candidates – the origin of life, oxygen-producing photosynthesis, multicellular animals and humanlike intelligence – all share the same pattern. They are each constrained to a single branch on the tree of life.

    However, as the evolutionary biologist and paleontologist Geerat Vermeij argued, there are other ways to explain why these evolutionary events appear to have happened only once.

    This pattern of apparently singular origins could arise from information loss due to extinction and the incompleteness of the fossil record. Perhaps these innovations each evolved more than once, but only one example of each survived to the modern day. Maybe the extinct examples never became fossilized, or paleontologists haven’t recognized them in the fossil record.

    Or maybe these innovations did happen only once, but because they could have happened only once. For example, perhaps the first evolutionary lineage to achieve one of these innovations quickly outcompeted other similar organisms from other lineages for resources. Or maybe the first lineage changed the global environment so dramatically that other lineages lost the opportunity to evolve the same innovation. In other words, once the step occurred in one lineage, the chemical or ecological conditions were changed enough that other lineages could not develop in the same way.

    If these alternative mechanisms explain the uniqueness of these proposed hard steps, then none of them would actually qualify as hard steps.

    But if none of these steps were hard, then why didn’t humanlike intelligence evolve much sooner in the history of life?

    Environmental evolution

    Geobiologists reconstructing the conditions of the ancient Earth can easily come up with reasons why intelligent life did not evolve sooner in Earth history.

    For example, 90% of Earth’s history elapsed before the atmosphere had enough oxygen to support humans. Likewise, up to 50% of Earth’s history elapsed before the atmosphere had enough oxygen to support modern eukaryotic cells.

    All of the hard-step candidates have their own environmental requirements. When the Earth formed, these requirements weren’t in place. Instead, they appeared later on, as Earth’s surface environment changed.

    We suggest that as the Earth changed physically and chemically over time, its surface conditions allowed for a greater diversity of habitats for life. And these changes operate on geologic timescales – billions of years – explaining why the proposed hard steps evolved when they did, and not much earlier.

    In this view, humans originated when they did because the Earth became habitable to humans only relatively recently. Carter had not considered these points in 1983.

    Moving forward

    But hard steps could still exist. How can scientists test whether they do?

    Earth and life scientists could work together to determine when Earth’s surface environment first became supportive of each proposed hard step. Earth scientists could also forecast how much longer Earth will stay habitable for the different kinds of life associated with each proposed hard step – such as humans, animals and eukaryotic cells.

    Evolutionary biologists and paleontologists could better constrain how many times each hard-step candidate occurred. If they did occur only once each, they could see whether this came from their innate biological improbability or from environmental factors.

    Lastly, astronomers could use data from planets beyond the solar system to figure out how common life-hosting planets are, and how often these planets have hard-step candidates, such as oxygen-producing photosynthesis and intelligent life.

    If our view is correct, then the Earth and life have evolved together in a way that is more typical of life-supporting planets – not in the rare and improbable way that the hard-steps model predicts. Humanlike intelligence would then be a more expected outcome of Earth’s evolution, rather than a cosmic fluke.

    Researchers from a variety of disciplines, from paleontologists and biologists to astronomers, can work together to learn more about the probability of intelligent life evolving on Earth and elsewhere in the universe.

    If the evolution of humanlike life was more probable than the hard-steps model predicts, then researchers are more likely to find evidence for extraterrestrial intelligence in the future.

    Daniel Brady Mills receives funding from the German Research Foundation.

    Jason Wright works for Penn State University, where his research in the search for life in the universe is supported by internal funds, grants from NASA, and individual philanthropists.

    Jennifer L. Macalady works for Penn State University, where her research on how microorganisms, minerals and fluids interact through geologic time is supported by internal funds, grants from NASA and NSF, and grants from private foundations.

    – ref. Evolving intelligent life took billions of years − but it may not have been as unlikely as many scientists predicted – https://theconversation.com/evolving-intelligent-life-took-billions-of-years-but-it-may-not-have-been-as-unlikely-as-many-scientists-predicted-249114

    MIL OSI – Global Reports –

    February 15, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: NORTHCOM Commander Recommends Reopening Adak Base, Bolstering Homeland Missile Defense

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Alaska Dan Sullivan

    02.14.25

    WASHINGTON—In response to questions posed yesterday by U.S. Senator Dan Sullivan (R-Alaska) in a hearing of the Senate Armed Services Committee (SASC), General Gregory Guillot, commander of U.S. Northern Command and the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD), endorsed the idea of reopening the long-shuttered Adak Naval Air Station and increasing military infrastructure investments across Alaska. In his exchange with Gen. Guillot, Sen. Sullivan highlighted the escalating incursions by Russian and Chinese military aircraft and vessels in Alaska’s Air Defense Identification Zone (ADIZ) and Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) in the past several years.

    Gen. Guillot also committed to working with Sen. Sullivan on implementing President Trump’s executive order, “Iron Dome for America,” and on Sens. Sullivan and Kevin Cramer’s (R-N.D.) IRON DOME Act, new legislation to strengthen and expand the U.S. homeland missile defense system.

    [embedded content]

    Below is a full transcript of Sen. Sullivan’s exchange in SASC.

    Sen. Dan Sullivan: Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Gentlemen, thank you for your testimony. I want to echo what the chairman has been saying. We do need Canada to step up. When they don’t meet their 2 percent of GDP NATO commitments, it undermines the entire alliance. I appreciate that the chairman mentioned that. General, it was good to meet with you the other day. We had a meeting with senior Trump administration officials just a couple days ago—a number of senators who are focused on the border. They focused, like your testimony, a lot on the northern border, which I really appreciate. I have a chart here that depicts a lot of the air and sea incursions that we’ve seen in the last few years. It’s been quite remarkable, particularly the joint Chinese-Russian strategic bomber missions into our ADIZ and the joint Chinese-Russian naval task force—quite big—[an 11] ship naval task force [in 2023]. President Trump himself commented recently that we need to increase military investments in Alaska as Russia and China make more menacing moves in the region. That’s a list—that’s just an example of all the different incursions, air and sea, just in the last [few] years, which is quite astounding. General, I want to go into a little bit more detail. Your troops have done a great job of intercepting these strategic bombers. By the way, they come with armed MiGs, right? This is a serious incursion. Not easy to do. Our Navy’s done a good job—although, the first time we had that joint Russian-Chinese task force, we didn’t have any Navy response, nothing, which was ridiculous, in my view. One 150-foot Coast Guard cutter. But these are difficult missions, made more difficult—for example, when you’re intercepting strategic bombers, a lot of times our fighters are having to fly over a thousand miles just to get to the end of the ADIZ to intercept them. So, my question—Do you agree we need more infrastructure? You and I have talked about reopening the airfield and the Navy base at Adak, which is out here in the Aleutian Island chain, or Utqiagvik and Barrow, Alaska, to help with the SAR missions. Can you explain that in a little bit more detail? Admiral Paparo is in agreement with you on this. These incursions are going to increase. This is America, our northern border, and yet the infrastructure we have for the young men and women who are doing these dangerous intercept missions, both at sea and in the air, they need more infrastructure for their safety and for our rapid response. Do you agree with me that they do and would you support reopening the Adak naval base and the extension of the Barrow runway, which is way up there in the northern part of America, North America?

    Gen. Greg Guillot: Senator, I do agree with you. As you mentioned, Admiral Paparo and I are very closely linked and aligned on all issues in the Pacific. I would support Adak for sure for maritime and air access and, as you pointed out, Deadhorse or a point at the far north part of Alaska, because those missions aren’t only long—a thousand miles or more with five or six or seven air refuelings usually at night—but also the harsh conditions. If a pilot should have to eject, having those forward points that you mentioned would allow us to pre-position search and rescue aircraft or be able to land there in an emergency, which are capabilities that we just don’t have right now.

    DS: Great. Thank you on that. Again, I want to thank the men and women under your command. They do these intercept missions all the time. They’re very tough. They’re dangerous. They don’t make a lot of news down here in the Lower 48, but they’re doing a great job.

    Let me turn to missile defense. Senator Cramer and I recently introduced our IRON DOME Act that reinforces what President Trump’s executive order does. That’s a depiction of that, covering the whole United States with integrated missile defense systems to protect our homeland. I’d love to get co-sponsorships from all my colleagues. My 2017 Advancing America’s Missile Defense Act, which pretty much became law in the NDAA, had 30 co-sponsors—ten Democrats, 20 Republicans. Can I get your sense to—first, your commitment to work with me and Senator Cramer on that? Then, you mentioned the NGIs and the ground-based missile interceptors. Those are almost all based in Alaska. Why is it taking so long to fill those 20 silos that we just built out that are needed? Can I get your commitment to work with me, as part of this IRON DOME Act, to accelerate that?

    GG: Senator, you have my full commitment to work with you on the Iron Dome. The core mission of NORAD and NORTHCOM is to defend just as you described there. You also have my full commitment to work to move all defense industrial base capabilities to the left to bring these capabilities earlier as our adversaries are advancing their capability, and we must keep pace.

    MIL OSI USA News –

    February 15, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Attorney General Alan Wilson urges U.S. Senate to pass HALT Fentanyl Act, end loophole for Chinese copycat fentanylRead More

    Source: US State of South Carolina

    (COLUMBIA, S.C.) – South Carolina Attorney General Alan Wilson has joined a total of 25 states in urging the U.S. Senate to pass the HALT Fentanyl Act, which will end the copycat fentanyl loophole and save American lives.

    Since 2018, fentanyl has killed nearly as many Americans as World War II. The problem has only been made worse by Mexican drug cartels smuggling deadly Chinese-made copycat fentanyl across the southern border. Between October 2021 and June 2022 alone, U.S. Customs and Border Protection seized enough fentanyl to kill the entire American population five times over.

    “There is no reason anyone should be against this law,” Attorney General Wilson said. “Fentanyl and copycat fentanyl are killing more South Carolinians than any other drug and we need to do everything we can to stop it.” 

    Copycat fentanyl, or fentanyl analogs, are lab-created drugs that are made to work around U.S. law. These fentanyl analogs are often more harmful than prescription fentanyl. Classifying fentanyl analogs as Schedule I drugs closes a loophole for drug dealers by giving law enforcement the tools to prosecute anyone who sells or uses the deadly copycat fentanyl analogs. Congress temporarily classified fentanyl and fentanyl analogs as Schedule I drugs, but that status is set to expire on March 31. The HALT Fentanyl Act will permanently fix the problem.

    The U.S. House of Representatives passed the HALT Fentanyl Act law with an overwhelming bipartisan majority. The States are now calling on the Senate to do the same.

    Iowa and Virginia co-led the letter. South Carolina is joined by the following states that signed on: Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, New Hampshire, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, West Virginia, and Wyoming. 

    Read the full letter here.

    MIL OSI USA News –

    February 15, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Big Tech’s non-compliance with European internet rules: DSA Audit Reports – E-002858/2024(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    Article 42(4) of Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 (Digital Services Act — DSA[1]) requires very large online platforms (VLOPs) and search engines (VLOSEs) to publish the audit report and the audit implementation report on an easily accessible section of its online interface.

    The 19 VLOPs and VLOSEs[2] which were designated in April 2023 published their reports at the end of 2024. The Commission has published an overview table with links to the risk assessment, audit and audit implementation reports[3].

    A regulatory dialogue is in place with the designated entities in the framework of the DSA, including on audits, where feedback is provided in relation to the first year’s DSA audit. The Commission is gathering inputs concerning the need of possible additional guidance on this topic.

    DSA audits contribute to the enforcement work of the Commission and of the Member States, with other relevant information, such as researchers’ reports pursuant to DSA Article 40.

    The Commission constantly monitors compliance with the DSA and, where suspicions of infringement arise, it can open formal proceedings.

    As of January 2025, 10 formal proceedings have been opened against X, TikTok, AliExpress, Meta’s Facebook and Instagram, and Temu because of potential breaches of the DSA in various areas[4], one of these has been closed, following commitments by TikTok[5].

    • [1] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32022R2065
    • [2] https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_23_2413
    • [3] How the Digital Services Act enhances transparency online | Shaping Europe’s digital future
    • [4] https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/list-designated-vlops-and-vloses
    • [5] https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_24_4161
    Last updated: 14 February 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

    February 15, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Takata airbag recall scandal – E-002668/2024(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    According to Regulation (EU) 2018/858 on the approval and market surveillance of motor vehicles[1], where a vehicle or component represents a serious risk, the manufacturer shall immediately inform national authorities[2] on the risk and the measures taken.

    Where the risk requires rapid action, national authorities must take all appropriate restrictive measures[3]. Hence, Member States must ensure the proper recall of vehicles.

    The new framework on general product safety[4] strengthens the obligations of economic operators and the rights of consumers to information and to cost-free, timely and effective remedies in case of product safety recalls. Economic operators shall actively reach out to consumers and provide them a choice between at least two remedies[5].

    In addition, the standardised template for recall notice[6] will make it easier for consumers to identify and understand recalls and for businesses to comply with their obligations.

    • [1] Regulation (EU) 2018/858 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the approval and market surveillance of motor vehicles (OJ L 151, 14.6.2018, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2018/858/oj).
    • [2] Approval authorities and market surveillance authorities.
    • [3] Article 52(3) of the regulation.
    • [4] Regulation (EU) 2023/988 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 May 2023 on general product safety (OJ L 135, 23.5.2023, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2023/988/oj), which applies from 13 December 2024.
    • [5] e.g.  repair, replacement or reimbursement ( Article 37 of the GPSR).
    • [6] Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/1435 of 24 May 2024 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) 2023/988 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards establishing the template for a recall notice ( OJ L, 2024/1435, 27.5.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg_impl/2024/1435/oj ).
    Last updated: 14 February 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

    February 15, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Responsibility of online market platforms – E-002518/2024(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The report on the implementation of Article 4 of Regulation 2019/1020[1] is being finalised. It is expected to be delivered in quarter 1 2025[2] and will not be accompanied by a legislative proposal. A comprehensive evaluation report of the regulation shall be published by 31 December 2026.

    Online marketplaces carry out a different role than the traders they host, since they are normally not defining the kind and characteristics of products sold , nor have necessarily access to the goods, their packaging and other kind of information held by the economic operator.

    F or this reason, Regulation (EU) 2022/2065[3], the Digital Service Act (DSA), confirms the basic principle that online marketplaces are not responsible, under certain conditions, for the products sold on their platforms by third parties.

    Nevertheless, online marketplaces are subject to several due diligence obligations stemming from the DSA (e.g. traceability of traders, compliance by design and, for very large online platform, proactive assessment of risks and tailored mitigation measures) and from the General Product Safety Regulation[4], which became applicable as of 13 December 2024. It is therefore of key importance that these different requirements are now enforced in a coordinated manner.

    Under Article 34 and 35 of the DSA, providers of very large online marketplaces are required to assess and effectively mitigate systemic risks that their services pose to consumer protection. These obligations address risks stemming from illegal and dangerous products.

    The Commission is committed to addressing the challenges of e-commerce platforms to ensure safety and security, EU sustainable standards and a level playing field within the single market and adopted a communication on 5 February 2025[5].

    • [1] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32019R1020
    • [2] Due to data limitations, the report was not made available at the date foreseen in the regulation.
    • [3] Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 October 2022 on a Single Market For Digital Services and amending Directive 2000/31/EC (Digital Services Act)
    • [4] Regulation (EU) 2023/988 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 May 2023 on general product safety, amending Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Directive (EU) 2020/1828 of the European Parliament and the Council, and repealing Directive 2001/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Council Directive 87/357/EEC
    • [5] Commission Communication on a comprehensive EU toolbox for safe and sustainable e-commerce ( COM(2025) 37 final of 5.2.2025).

    MIL OSI Europe News –

    February 15, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Extending CBAM to furniture fittings – E-002942/2024(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    As part of the review of the of the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism Regulation (CBAM), the Commission is assessing the need to extend CBAM to downstream products in order to ensure that the CBAM is fully effective in contributing to overall emissions reduction as well as addressing the risk that carbon leakage is pushed further down the value chain.

    Any such potential extension needs to be manageable and proportional to the objectives of the mechanism. The relevant analysis, based on the data collected during the transitional period, is ongoing and will be integrated in the 2025 report to the Council and the European Parliament.

    This report will already look into the question of export carbon leakage, building on the Commission’s 2024 Carbon Market Report.

    Last updated: 14 February 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

    February 15, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Bringing natural silicon under the scope of EU Regulation 2024/1252 as a critical raw material – E-002401/2024(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Commission confirms to the Honourable Member that under the Critical Raw Materials Act (CRM Act), silicon metal is considered a critical raw material[1], but not natural silicon. That is because silicon is a highly reactive element, and pure silicon does not occur in a natural form.

    Silicon metal is the base product for chemical products like silicones and silanes, aluminium and ferro-alloys and polysilicon for semiconductors.

    At the same time, the value chains of critical raw materials, from extraction — in this case, quartz — to recycling, are covered under the CRM Act, provided the extracted resources are refined to the specified material.

    • [1] Regulation (EU) 2024/1252, OJ L, 2024/1252, 3.5.2024, Annex 2.
    Last updated: 14 February 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

    February 15, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – New attack on Spanish agricultural products and other goods by French farmers – E-002600/2024(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    Member States are bound by the duty of sincere cooperation to ensure fulfilment of the obligations arising from the Treaties[1]. When blockades and disturbances occur, such as the protests in question, national authorities must take all necessary and proportionate measures to ensure the free movement of goods on their territory[2]. This duty is reinforced by a series of obligations contained in Council Regulation (EC) No 2679/98[3].

    The Commission has acted promptly to ensure that EU rules are respected. Following press reports and a formal request from the Spanish authorities under the above-mentioned Regulation, the Commission, on 21 November 2024, requested information from the French authorities concerning the details of the incidents that had occurred, as well as the action they had taken and/or would take to prevent these recurring .

    On the question of compensation for the losses caused by the destruction of goods, the Court of Justice of the EU has developed a general principle of state responsibility regarding compliance with EU law.

    The conditions for an individual to obtain reparation for damages caused by a breach of EU law attributable to the state are set out in this case-law[4].

    • [1] Article 4(3) of the Treaty on EU.
    • [2] Judgment of 9 December 1997, Commission of the European Communities v French Republic, Case C-265/95, EU:C:1997:595.
    • [3] Council Regulation (EC) No 2679/98 of 7 December 1998 on the functioning of the internal market in relation to the free movement of goods among the Member States, OJ L 337, 12.12.1998, p. 8-9.
    • [4] Judgment of 19 November 1991, Andrea Francovich and Danila Bonifaci and others v Italian Republic, joined cases C-6/90 and C-9/90, EU:C:1991:428 and Judgment of 5 March 1996, Brasserie du Pêcheur S v Bundesrepublik Deutschland and The Queen v Secretary of State for Transport, ex parte: Factortame Ltd and others, joined Cases C-46/93 and C-48/93, EU:C:1996:79.
    Last updated: 14 February 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

    February 15, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Europe: Briefing – AI factories – 14-02-2025

    Source: European Parliament

    The EU has made significant progress towards trustworthy and ethical artificial intelligence that puts people first. In June 2024, the EU co-legislators signed the Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act), the first horizontal legislation regulating AI systems. The focus is now shifting to bolstering the EU’s position in AI innovation. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen has promised to establish AI factories within the first 100 days of her term. AI factories will give companies and researchers access to the EU’s supercomputers, tailored to AI needs. AI factories bring together three essential components: supercomputers, data and human capital. The European High Performance Computing Joint Undertaking plays a pivotal role in this initiative, providing the necessary supercomputing infrastructure and covering half of the acquisition and operation costs of AI-optimised supercomputers as well as half of the cost of the services provided by AI factories. Seven consortia across the EU were selected to establish these factories, in Finland, Luxembourg, Sweden, Germany, Italy, Spain and Greece. Further proposals for AI factories are expected in February 2025. AI factories contribute to the EU’s strategic autonomy and support AI start-ups, industry and academia by enabling AI development and innovation in the EU while helping to reduce AI model training time and costs. They also facilitate access to data, help to develop the necessary skills and provide professional support services. However, challenges remain, such as making the process of applying for computing resources as smooth as possible, continuing to improve the energy efficiency of supercomputers and associated data centres, ensuring timely access to state-of-the-art AI chips, and advancing quickly with the establishment of AI factories. If addressed successfully, AI factories have the potential to enhance AI innovation in the EU. At the same time, it is essential to act on other fronts, such as improving the EU’s cloud-computing infrastructure.

    MIL OSI Europe News –

    February 15, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Europe: Other events – CJEU judgment recognizing the Taliban’s Oppression of Afghan Women as Persecution – 18-02-2025 – Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs

    Source: European Parliament

    On 18 February, LIBE Members will exchange on the topics of gender-based violence and the right to international protection of Afghan women and girls with representatives of the European Commission and the UNHCR Representation for EU Affairs.

    On 4 October 2024, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) ruled that systemic discrimination such as that faced by Afghan women under the Taliban’s rule amounts to persecution under EU asylum law. The judgment, prompted by requests for a preliminary ruling by the Austrian Supreme Administrative Court, affirms that taken cumulatively, the lack of protection from gender-based and domestic violence and forced marriage, along with forced veiling and restrictions on education, employment, healthcare, movement, and political participation, violates human dignity. The CJEU clarified that asylum authorities need not consider other factors regarding an applicant’s individual status besides her gender and nationality when assessing whether the accumulation of discriminatory measures amounts to persecution, thus strengthening Afghan women’s right to international protection.

    MIL OSI Europe News –

    February 15, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Social media censorship in Germany: compatibility with EU principles of freedom of expression – E-002842/2024(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Commission is committed to protecting freedom of expression as a fundamental right be it offline or online. Freedom of expression is essential to the EU’s democratic system and is protected under the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights (the Charter),[1] which is binding on the EU institutions but also Member States when they are implementing EU law[2].

    In this case, it is for the Member State, including its judicial authorities, to ensure that fundamental rights are effectively respected and protected in accordance with national law and international human rights obligations.

    The Commission has not been contacted by the Federal Government of Germany regarding possible plans to introduce rules such as those claimed by the Honourable Members and has not assessed their compatibility with EU law following such notification.

    The Digital Services Act (DSA)[3] aims to ensure a safe, predictable and trusted online environment that facilitates innovation and protects the fundamental rights enshrined in the Charter , such as the freedom of expression.

    The DSA sets out rules and responsibilities for online intermediaries to tackle illegal content (as defined in national and EU law), while safeguarding freedom of expression and information.

    It also contains a prohibition on general monitoring and conditional liability exemptions for online intermediaries, which aim to prevent over-removal of legitimate content online.

    Users can seek review of content moderation decisions through internal complaint-handling systems and out-of-court dispute settlement bodies.

    Moreover, the DSA obliges online platforms and search engines w ith more than 45 million average monthly users in the EU to assess and mitigate the systemic risks to which their services give rise.

    • [1] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/treaty/char_2012/oj
    • [2] Article 51(1) of the Charter.
    • [3] Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 October 2022 on a Single Market for Digital Services and amending Directive 2000/31/EC (Digital Services Act), OJ L 277, 27.10.2022, p. 1 — 102.
    Last updated: 14 February 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

    February 15, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Horizon Europe: frontloading bureaucracy – E-002334/2024(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    1. Despite being only one of five ranking criteria for ex aequo scored proposals[1] and used only in 3% of cases in 2021-2023, the gender balance ranking criterion is effective and led to an increase from 37% of women researchers in Horizon 2020 to 38% in Horizon Europe, above the 34% average share of women among EU researchers. There is no evidence that the share of women researchers decreases between proposal and project stage, as it is 1.1 percentage points higher in projects. The share of women in work package leaders has also grown from 23% in Horizon 2020 to 31% in Horizon Europe.

    2. The Commission is of the opinion that lump sum proposals are not more complex, but is aware of the concern raised by some beneficiaries. The Horizon Europe application form is the same for all types of grants[2]. All applicants must use detailed cost estimations and keep them on file[3]. For certain lump sum grants, the cost estimations are submitted as part of the proposal. Most applicants confirmed that completing the Excel template provided for this purpose does not take a significant amount of time[4]. To improve user-friendliness, the lump sum budget will be integrated in the electronic submission system[5].

    3. Implementation of the EU budget, including for Research and Innovation, may not harm the environment[6], and the Commission screens all Horizon Europe topics to ensure this principle. Surveys suggest that applicants appreciate the clear instructions[7].

    The Commission has revised the approach to this screening for the second part of Horizon Europe[8]. From 2025 on, the environmental dimension in the ethics appraisal will be improved, to avoid duplication of information in proposals and to better manag e the risks of possible negative environmental effects.

    • [1] provided for in the General Annexes of the Horizon Europe Work Programme.
    • [2] irrespective of the costs options that apply.
    • [3] Get prepared — Online Manual — Funding Tenders Opportunities https://webgate.ec.europa.eu/funding-tenders-opportunities/display/OM/Get+prepared (section ‘Budget’).
    • [4] Assessment of Lump Sum Funding in Horizon 2020 and Horizon Europe https://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tenders/opportunities/docs/2021-2027/horizon/other/comm/ls-assessment-report-2024_en.pdf (section ‘Proposal submission and evaluation’, pp. 25-31)
    • [5] Submit a proposal — Electronic Submission System — Online Manual — Funding Tenders Opportunities https://webgate.ec.europa.eu/funding-tenders-opportunities/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=1867927
    • [6] As set out in the Interinstitutional accompanying the Multiannual Financial Framework 2021-2027 of 16 December 2020, Point16 (OJ L 433, 22/12/2020) and in the financial rules (Financial Regulation, Article 33(2d)) — https://commission.europa.eu/publications/eu-financial-regulation_en
    • [7] Horizon Europe and the Green Transition — Publications Office of the EU
      https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/c9383687-6420-11ef-a8ba-01aa75ed71a1/language-en, figure 63.
    • [8] As set out in the Horizon Europe Strategic Plan 2025-2027
      https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/6abcc8e7-e685-11ee-8b2b-01aa75ed71a1 , page 45.
    Last updated: 14 February 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

    February 15, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Risk to hunting tourism – E-002699/2024(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Commission is aware of the economic importance of hunting tourism. One of the objectives of the recast Regulation on import, export and transit of firearms is to facilitate and decrease the administrative burden for temporary import and re-export of firearms for hunting excursions in the EU.

    The full provision of the adopted text[1] quoted by the Honourable Member (Article 11(3) point c) reads as follows: The application for the import authorisation referred to in paragraph 2 shall include the following […] (c): the date and unique reference number of the authorisation, or equivalent, to own or possess a firearm and of the export authorisation from the third country, or where applicable, proof of the exception from that authorisation.

    The reference to the ‘proof of exception from that authorisation’ acknowledges the fact that some third countries do not require an authorisation for owning a firearm or for exporting a firearm. Hunters from countries with no requirement for a firearms licence can therefore request an authorisation by submitting this proof to the competent authorities.

    These rules will be applicable 48 months after the entry into force of the recast Regulation[2].

    • [1] OJ L, 2025/41, 22.1.2025.
    • [2] Entry into application will be 12 February 2029.
    Last updated: 14 February 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

    February 15, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Boosting European production of audiovisual and cinematographic works – E-003009/2024(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Commission remains strongly committed to promoting the competitiveness of European media companies, encouraging the cross-border circulation of media content and enhancing cultural diversity and media pluralism as key policy objectives under the Audiovisual Media Services Directive (AVMSD)[1].

    The Commission regularly reports on the implementation of the rules to promote European works by linear and nonlinear service providers set in Articles 13, 16 and 17 of the AVMSD.

    Additionally, by December 2026, the Commission will assess the impact of the AVMSD and deliver an evaluation report. The evaluation report will examine the relevance of current rules, including those on the promotion of European works and quota obligations. It will also identify potential shortcomings in view of the evolution of the market.

    The country-of-origin principle remains a cornerstone of the internal audiovisual media market. The European Media Freedom Act[2] has introduced a new cooperation mechanism among national media regulators designed to enhance regulatory convergence and enforcement under the AVMSD. If a revision of the AVMSD proves to be necessary, the Commission will carefully evaluate different options for achieving its objectives .

    The current AVMSD definition of European works covers all the audiovisual works originating in the EU, and also those from parties to the European Convention on Transfrontier Television of the Council of Europe[3].

    Any change would have to, on the one hand, be duly justified, e.g. based on strong evidence of positive impact on the European economy and, on the other hand, avoid unjustified or disproportionate harm to European media service providers.

    • [1] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32018L1808
    • [2] https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/priorities-2019-2024/new-push-european-democracy/protecting-democracy/european-media-freedom-act_en
    • [3] https://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/-/council-of-europe-european-convention-on-transfrontier-television-ets-no-132-translations
    Last updated: 14 February 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

    February 15, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Europe: Humanitarian crisis in the Democratic Republic of the Congo: Switzerland provides CHF 3 million

    Source: Switzerland – Federal Administration in English

    Due to the grave situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Switzerland is providing CHF 3 million in humanitarian aid. This support package will go mainly to the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) and other partners on the ground who are already active in the areas of health, protection of the civilian population and emergency aid for displaced persons.

    MIL OSI Europe News –

    February 15, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Europe: Highlights – 2023 discharge: General budget of the EU: Commission and Agencies – Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality

    Source: European Parliament

    On Tuesday, 18 February 2025, the FEMM Committee will vote on the draft 2023 discharge opinions: General budget of the EU: Commission and Agencies.

    The FEMM Committee will vote on a set compromises and alternative compromises. Members are due to adopt their position on the discharge procedure and to decide if they want to grant discharge to the European Commission and the European Institute for Gender Equality (EIGE).”

    MIL OSI Europe News –

    February 15, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Europe: Highlights – Commission and Council Presidency on the preparation of CSW69 – Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality

    Source: European Parliament

    On Tuesday, 18 February 2025, the FEMM Committee invites Council Presidency and Commission to debate on the preparation of the 69th session of the Commission on the Status of Women will take place from 10 to 21 March 2025 in New York.

    The sixty-ninth session of the Commission on the Status of Women will take place from 10 to 21 March 2025 in New York. The main focus of the sixty-ninth session will be on the review and appraisal of the implementation of the Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action and the outcomes of the 23rd special session of the General Assembly. The review will include an assessment of current challenges that affect the implementation of the Platform for Action and the achievement of gender equality and the empowerment of women and its contribution towards the full realization of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.

    MIL OSI Europe News –

    February 15, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Europe: Highlights – EU long-term budget – Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality

    Source: European Parliament

    On Tuesday, 18 February 2025, the FEMM Committee will consider the draft opinion prepared by Rapporteur Alexandra Geese on the BUDG draft own-initiative report entitled “A Revamped Long-Term Budget for the Union in a Changing World”.

    The draft opinion highlights that budgets are never gender-neutral and that attention should be given to ensuring that the EU budget does not reinforce gender inequalities or allocate funds to actors undermining women’s rights.

    MIL OSI Europe News –

    February 15, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Europe: Highlights – Gender Mainstreaming Network (GMN): first meeting in 10th legislative term – Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality

    Source: European Parliament

    On Tuesday, 18 February 2025, the FEMM Committee invited Members of the GMN to hold an exchange of view on the priorities and organisation of work of the Network in the 10th parliamentary term.

    At the first meeting of the Gender Mainstreaming Network (GMN) of this parliamentary term, an exchange of views on the priorities and organisation of work of the Network of Members in charge of Gender Mainstreaming will be held, as well as an exchange of views with the FEMM Members in charge of gender mainstreaming in the European Parliament. The GMN is composed of Members from each parliamentary committee and the Conference of Delegation Chairs responsible for gender mainstreaming. It is a forum for exchanging information on ongoing files of interest from a gender equality perspective and for sharing best practices.

    MIL OSI Europe News –

    February 15, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Europe: Highlights – Victim’s Rights Directive – reporting back to the committee on the negotiations – Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality

    Source: European Parliament

    On Tuesday, 28 January 2025, the FEMM Committee invited the FEMM co-rapporteur, Lucia Yar, to report back on the negotiation which took place on 5 February 2025.

    The FEMM Chair and FEMM co-rapporteur will report on the progress made in the negotiations on the Directive with the Polish Presidency.

    MIL OSI Europe News –

    February 15, 2025
←Previous Page
1 … 1,325 1,326 1,327 1,328 1,329 … 1,780
Next Page→
NewzIntel.com

NewzIntel.com

MIL Open Source Intelligence

  • Blog
  • About
  • FAQs
  • Authors
  • Events
  • Shop
  • Patterns
  • Themes

Twenty Twenty-Five

Designed with WordPress