Category: Europe

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: UK: over 60% of people agree it should not be a crime for sex workers to work together – new poll

    Source: Amnesty International –

    61% of adults believe it should not be a crime for two or more sex workers to work together  

    Over half believe consensual sex work should be fully decriminalised  

    “Full decriminalisation is the only option to keep sex workers safe” – Chiara Capraro  

    Sex work should be fully decriminalised in the UK to protect sex workers’ human rights and safety, Amnesty International UK has said today.  

    In England and Wales, the buying and selling of sexual services is legal, but some activities around sex work are not – sex workers who decide to work together for safety can be charged with brothel keeping and it is a criminal offence to ‘solicit’ clients in public spaces. As a result, sex workers are forced to work on their own, at increased risk of violence.   

    A new poll* commissioned by Amnesty UK has shown that the majority of the UK public (61%) believe that it should not be a crime for two or more sex workers to work together, and more than half (53%) of UK adults agree that consensual adult sex work should be fully decriminalised.  

    Chiara Capraro, Amnesty International UK’s Gender Justice Programme Director, said:   

    “Our poll shows that the majority of the UK public wants the law to protect, not punish sex workers.  

    “Most people go into sex work due to poverty. Years of austerity and the cost-of-living crisis are pushing more and more women into sex work to support themselves and their families. Rather than keeping these women safe and helping them to leave sex work if they so wish, the current law forces sex workers into harmful, dangerous and isolating situations and can trap them in a cycle of poverty.  

    “Sex workers should be able to work together for safety, but instead criminalisation forces them to work in precarious situations alone, making them vulnerable to violence and abuse and blocking them from accessing health care and other vital services. 

    “Full decriminalisation is the only option to keep sex workers safe – it would allow them to work together for security, improve their ability to report violence to the authorities and access justice and support.” 

    Amnesty International UK is calling for decriminalisation alongside a coalition of sex worker led and human rights organisations, including Decrim Now and the English Collective of Prostitutes.  

    Megan Isaac, a spokesperson from Decrim Now, said:  

    “This polling shows that the general public agrees with what sex workers have long been calling for: we need full decriminalisation so that sex workers can work together for safety, without having to fear fines, eviction, or arrest. The government has abandoned millions of people in the UK to living in poverty – it’s deeply unfair to criminalise people who turn to sex work so that they can survive. 

    “We know that it’s possible for the law to change. New Zealand decriminalised sex work in 2003 and Belgium did so in 2022, recently implementing laws that would give sex workers access to maternity leave, sick pay, and protection from harassment. Politicians must take action to decriminalise sex work in the UK, to protect sex workers’ safety, health, and human rights.” 

    Laura Watson, a spokesperson from the English Collective of Prostitutes, said:  

    “Most of the women in our group are mothers working to support children and we are furious that we are pushed into this job by poverty and then criminalised for trying to survive and keep our families together. Those of us who are migrant and/or women of colour get particularly targeted.  

    “Sex workers are facing epidemic levels of rape and other violence but we can’t report to the police because we are frightened about being arrested ourselves for soliciting or brothel-keeping.  

    “If we are working on the street, we end up running from the police and being pushed into more isolated areas. Many of us would like to work together with another woman inside because it is safer but if we do that we can be arrested for brothel-keeping.” 

    ENDS 

    Background 

    *Savanta interviewed 2,208 UK adults aged 18+ online between the 29 November and 2 December 2024. Data were weighted to be representative of the UK by age, gender, and region. Savanta is a member of the British Polling Council and abides by its rules. 

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: Munich Security Conference: Amnesty’s Secretary General calls on states to resist attacks on human rights protections

    Source: Amnesty International –

    Amnesty International’s Secretary General Agnès Callamard will be attending the Munich Security Conference from 14 to 16 February, where she will be available for interview and will call on world leaders and senior officials to resolutely come together to resist attacks on human rights and the global multilateral architecture and avoid further harm to human rights protections and the rules-based order.

    “The past 12 months have laid bare precisely how hellish the world can be when states don’t apply universal standards and insist that international law and multilateral decisions do not apply to their actions. Consider Israel’s genocide against Palestinians in Gaza, Russia’s ongoing war of aggression against Ukraine, the conflict still raging in Sudan, the worsening catastrophe in Myanmar, and the recent uptick in fighting in the Democratic Republic of Congo,” Agnès Callamard said.

    “Following the long overdue ceasefire in Gaza and the transition of power in Syria, the question turns to how lasting peace and justice can be achieved in such contexts. States must commit their full support to bodies like the International Court of Justice and the International Criminal Court in their efforts to uphold the law, as failure to hold perpetrators accountable will only embolden other aggressors and fuel further cycles of violence and destruction.

    The past 12 months have laid bare precisely how hellish the world can be when states don’t apply universal standards and insist that international law and multilateral decisions do not apply to their actions.

    Agnès Callamard, Amnesty International’s Secretary General

    “In these precarious times, humanity can ill afford further breakdowns in the international order. We do not need more instability, division or turmoil; we do not need more attacks on human rights values and further undermining of our already fragile commitments to address climate change. We need sustainable, future-focused solutions. The multilateral system may be failing us, but the answer is not to abandon it to the abyss. The answer is to strengthen and reform it, grounding it in a common vision so it can make good on its promise of global stability and universal human rights protections. The Munich Security Conference presents a timely opportunity for world leaders to begin to address these challenges and pave the way for a future free of the harrowing conflicts that blight today’s world.”

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Trefusis Park works to begin this year

    Source: City of Plymouth

    Work to transform Trefusis Park into a green solution to nearby flooding issues is set to begin later this year.

    The scheme, which was consulted on for a second time in 2024, will see the park become home to a new sustainable drainage system.

    As part of the works a seasonal wetland area will be installed to help reduce the risk of flooding to homes and businesses in the local area by safely storing water during heavy rainfall.

    Having received funding for the scheme from the Environment Agency, we are working towards appointing a contractor in the near future, with the aim of starting work in in the Spring.

    Councillor Tom Briars-Delve, Cabinet Member for the Environment and Climate Change, said: “I’m really pleased that this project is able to progress and that we’ll be able to get spades in the ground in the very near future.

    “This project is not just crucial from an aesthetics and nature point of view but it’s also a key natural solution to flooding.

    “We see time and again what happens when there is heavy rainfall in this area and I hope that residents and businesses in Lipson Vale will welcome this news.”

    The Trefusis Park Flood Relief Scheme has been in development for several years.

    It will provide new wildlife-rich habitats, including the planting of new trees and hedgerow, as well as new paths and seating. In addition, a new amenity pond will be created on the site of the old lake at the southern end of the park. A new half-sized basketball court will also be installed.

    The scheme is required to alleviate flooding in Lipson Vale, particularly at its junction with Bernice Terrace, which has seen high rainfall cause persistent flooding for many years.

    The seasonal wetland basins within the park will store surface water during heavy rainfall, which will then be slowly released back into the drainage system once the rain has passed and the system has capacity again. This will enable the drainage system downstream of the park to cope better and will also mean that roads and pavements will be less likely to close because of flood water.

    The scheme will also allow South West Water to carry out work to stop surface water entering the combined foul sewer upstream of the park. This will further reduce the risk of flooding and improve water quality in the River Plym by reducing the number of combined sewer overflow (CSO) spills that occur during heavy rainfall.

    Once South West Water’s works have been completed, 147 homes in the Lipson Vale area will be better protected from flooding.

    A consultation on the scheme initially took place in November/December 2021 and with the feedback gathered, detailed designs and further environmental plans and surveys were produced. It soon became apparent that to continue with the scheme in its original form, nearly 100 trees would need to be felled, which was clearly at odds with the environmental focus of the project.

    As a result, and following advice from a specialist arboriculturist, a revised design was drawn up, which while still requiring the removal of five trees, significantly reduces the amount that need to be felled. A second public consultation on the revised design took place in October 2024.

    The five trees that need to be removed are set to be felled in late February 2025.

    The Trefusis Park Ponds Project is being delivered by Plymouth City Council in partnership with the Environment Agency and South West Water,

    More details about the scheme and ways in which you can share your views can be found at: www.plymouth.gov.uk/trefusisparkfloodreliefscheme

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI USA: Disaster Recovery Centers in Coffee and Lowndes Counties to Close Permanently This Week; FEMA Representatives Relocating

    Source: US Federal Emergency Management Agency

    Headline: Disaster Recovery Centers in Coffee and Lowndes Counties to Close Permanently This Week; FEMA Representatives Relocating

    Disaster Recovery Centers in Coffee and Lowndes Counties to Close Permanently This Week; FEMA Representatives Relocating

    The Disaster Recovery Centers (DRC) in Coffee and Lowndes counties are set to close permanently this week. FEMA representatives will relocate to the U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) Business Recovery Center (BRC) and Business Resource Assessment Center (BRAC) to continue assisting survivors for Tropical Storm Debby and Hurricane Helene. DRCs are currently open 8 a.m. to 6 p.m.Coffee County DRC – closing permanently at 6 p.m. Friday, Feb. 14Coffee County Service Center         1115 West Baker Hwy.Douglas, GA 31533Coffee County BRC – FEMA representatives will be here starting 10 a.m. Saturday, Feb. 15Satilla Regional Library200 S. Madison Ave.Douglas, GA 31533Hours: 10 a.m. to 6 p.m., Monday-Thursday; 10 a.m.  to 4 p.m., Friday; 10 a.m. to 2 p.m., Saturday; closed Sunday. Lowndes County DRC – closing permanently at 6 p.m. Saturday, Feb. 15Valdosta State University Foundation, Inc.901 N. Patterson St.Valdosta, GA 31601Lowndes County BRAC – FEMA representatives will be here starting 10 a.m. on Tuesday, Feb. 18Lowndes County Civic Center, 2102 E. Hill Ave. Bldg. DValdosta, GA 31601Hours: Monday – Saturday: 9:00am – 5:00pm Sunday: ClosedThe Feb. 7 deadline for Georgia survivors of Tropical Storm Debby (Aug. 4–20) and Hurricane Helene (Sept. 24–Oct. 30) in the 63 counties designated for Individual Assistance to apply for FEMA disaster assistance has now passed. To check on the status of your application, go to DisasterAssistance.gov. You may also use the FEMA App for mobile devices or call toll-free 800-621-3362. The telephone line is open every day and help is available in most languages. You can also contact the Georgia Call Center at 678-547-2861 for assistance with your application or visit an SBA BRC or BRAC.
    jakia.randolph
    Wed, 02/12/2025 – 13:17

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Security: Career Offender Sentenced to 22 Years in Prison for Armed Drug Trafficking

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

    Defendant has Seven Prior Felonies in Athens-Clarke, Gwinnett, Middle District of Georgia

    ATHENS, Ga. – A Northeast Georgia resident with a lengthy criminal history who was serving federal supervised release when officers found him illegally possessing a firearm and trafficking cocaine was sentenced to serve 22 years in prison today.

    Mandrell Antwoin Hull, 44, of Winterville, Georgia, was sentenced to serve 264 months in prison to be followed by five years of supervised release by U.S. District Judge Tilman E. “Tripp” Self, III on Feb. 12. Hull previously pleaded guilty to one count of possession with intent to distribute cocaine and one count of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon on July 22, 2024. There is no parole in the federal system.

    “We must hold repeat offenders accountable when they illegally arm themselves and violate the laws put in place to maintain order and safety for everyone,” said Acting U.S. Attorney C. Shanelle Booker. “Our dedicated federal prosecutorial team continues to work alongside our local, state and federal law enforcement partners to help ensure their efforts result in justice.”

    “Criminals like Hull continue to plague our communities with blatant disregard for the safety of others and reckless indifference to the law. It is only through our local and federal partnerships that we are able to put a stop to these violent repeat offenders,” said Robert Gibbs, Senior Supervisory Special Agent of FBI Atlanta’s Athens office. “This case is another example of how the FBI and our law enforcement partners are dedicated to keeping the streets of Georgia safe for everyone in our community.”

    According to court documents and statements referenced in court, Hull was serving supervised release for a 2018 federal conviction for marijuana distribution in Case No. 3:17-CR-24-CAR. On April 11, 2023, officers with the United States Probation Office (USPO) reached out to the FBI in Athens to request their assistance in conducting a search of Hull’s residence in Oglethorpe County, Georgia, because USPO believed that Hull was storing illegal drugs inside his residence. That same day, agents and officers searched his Winterville property and located cocaine, $32,826 in drug proceeds and a loaded 9mm pistol. Records show that Hull has five prior felony convictions in the Superior Court of Athens-Clarke County and one prior felony conviction in the Superior Court of Gwinnett County, in addition to his prior federal felony conviction for which he was serving supervised release at the time of this crime. It is illegal for a convicted felon to possess a firearm.

    This case is a part of Project Safe Neighborhoods (PSN), a program bringing together all levels of law enforcement and the communities they serve to reduce violent crime and gun violence, and to make our neighborhoods safer for everyone. On May 26, 2021, the Department of Justice launched a violent crime reduction strategy strengthening PSN based on these core principles: fostering trust and legitimacy in our communities, supporting community-based organizations that help prevent violence from occurring in the first place, setting focused and strategic enforcement priorities and measuring the results.

    The case was investigated by the FBI Athens Resident Agency Middle Georgia Safe Streets Gang Task Force and the Oglethorpe County Sheriff’s Office.

    Assistant U.S. Attorney Mike Morrison prosecuted the case for the Government.

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI: Nokia Corporation: Repurchase of own shares on 12.02.2025

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Nokia Corporation
    Stock Exchange Release
    12 February 2025 at 22:30 EET

    Nokia Corporation: Repurchase of own shares on 12.02.2025

    Espoo, Finland – On 12 February 2025 Nokia Corporation (LEI: 549300A0JPRWG1KI7U06) has acquired its own shares (ISIN FI0009000681) as follows:

    Trading venue (MIC Code) Number of shares Weighted average price / share, EUR*
    XHEL 1,334,463 4.74
    CEUX
    BATE
    AQEU
    TQEX
    Total 1,334,463 4.74

    * Rounded to two decimals

    On 22 November 2024, Nokia announced that its Board of Directors is initiating a share buyback program to offset the dilutive effect of new Nokia shares issued to the shareholders of Infinera Corporation and certain Infinera Corporation share-based incentives. The repurchases in compliance with the Market Abuse Regulation (EU) 596/2014 (MAR), the Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1052 and under the authorization granted by Nokia’s Annual General Meeting on 3 April 2024 started on 25 November 2024 and end by 31 December 2025 and target to repurchase 150 million shares for a maximum aggregate purchase price of EUR 900 million.

    Total cost of transactions executed on 12 February 2025 was EUR 6,328,290. After the disclosed transactions, Nokia Corporation holds 246,429,217 treasury shares.

    Details of transactions are included as an appendix to this announcement.

    On behalf of Nokia Corporation

    BofA Securities Europe SA

    About Nokia
    At Nokia, we create technology that helps the world act together.

    As a B2B technology innovation leader, we are pioneering networks that sense, think and act by leveraging our work across mobile, fixed and cloud networks. In addition, we create value with intellectual property and long-term research, led by the award-winning Nokia Bell Labs which is celebrating 100 years of innovation.

    With truly open architectures that seamlessly integrate into any ecosystem, our high-performance networks create new opportunities for monetization and scale. Service providers, enterprises and partners worldwide trust Nokia to deliver secure, reliable and sustainable networks today – and work with us to create the digital services and applications of the future.

    Inquiries:

    Nokia Communications
    Phone: +358 10 448 4900
    Email: press.services@nokia.com
    Maria Vaismaa, Global Head of External Communications

    Nokia Investor Relations
    Phone: +358 931 580 507
    Email: investor.relations@nokia.com

    Attachment

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Keynote Speech by Commissioner Kubilius at the Perspectives Spatiales

    Source: European Commission

    European Commission Speech Paris, 12 Feb 2025 I am very glad to be here in France, a country that has been a such a powerful engine for European cooperation in space since the very beginning. Thanks to France, Europe is a leading space power. For now. If we want to maintain our lead in space, we need to take bold and decisive steps.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on continuing detention and risk of the death penalty for individuals in Nigeria charged with blasphemy, notably the case of Yahaya Sharif-Aminu – RC-B10-0101/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    pursuant to Rules 150(5) and 136(4) of the Rules of Procedure
    replacing the following motions:
    B10‑0101/2025 (The Left)
    B10‑0104/2025 (Verts/ALE)
    B10‑0117/2025 (Renew)
    B10‑0120/2025 (S&D)
    B10‑0122/2025 (PPE)
    B10‑0123/2025 (ECR)

    Sebastião Bugalho, Miriam Lexmann, Željana Zovko, Vangelis Meimarakis, Wouter Beke, Isabel Wiseler‑Lima, Ingeborg Ter Laak, Tomáš Zdechovský, Mirosława Nykiel, Jessica Polfjärd, Luděk Niedermayer, Jan Farský, Andrey Kovatchev, Inese Vaidere
    on behalf of the PPE Group
    Yannis Maniatis, Francisco Assis, Hannes Heide
    on behalf of the S&D Group
    Adam Bielan, Arkadiusz Mularczyk, Joachim Stanisław Brudziński, Carlo Fidanza, Bert‑Jan Ruissen, Michał Dworczyk, Emmanouil Fragkos, Alberico Gambino, Małgorzata Gosiewska, Mariusz Kamiński, Marlena Maląg, Bogdan Rzońca, Waldemar Tomaszewski, Sebastian Tynkkynen, Aurelijus Veryga
    on behalf of the ECR Group
    Jan‑Christoph Oetjen, Oihane Agirregoitia Martínez, Petras Auštrevičius, Malik Azmani, Dan Barna, Benoit Cassart, Olivier Chastel, Engin Eroglu, Karin Karlsbro, Ilhan Kyuchyuk, Nathalie Loiseau, Urmas Paet, Marie‑Agnes Strack‑Zimmermann, Hilde Vautmans, Lucia Yar
    on behalf of the Renew Group
    Catarina Vieira
    on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
    Merja Kyllönen
    on behalf of The Left Group

    Document selected :  

    RC-B10-0101/2025

    Texts tabled :

    RC-B10-0101/2025

    Texts adopted :

    European Parliament resolution on continuing detention and risk of the death penalty for individuals in Nigeria charged with blasphemy, notably the case of Yahaya Sharif-Aminu

    (2025/2548(RSP))

    The European Parliament,

     having regard to its previous resolutions on Nigeria,

     having regard to Rules 150(5) and 136(4) of its Rules of Procedure,

    A. whereas on 10 August 2020, Nigerian singer Yahaya Sharif-Aminu was brought before an Upper Sharia Court in Kano State where he was tried without legal representation and sentenced to death by hanging for song lyrics allegedly containing derogatory comments regarding the Prophet Muhammad; whereas his family faced harassment and persecution following his arrest;

    B. whereas in January 2021, the Kano State High Court ordered a retrial and in August 2022, the Court of Appeal upheld it, while affirming the constitutionality of Sharia blasphemy laws, posing serious risk that the death sentence will be confirmed; whereas Sharif-Aminu appealed to the Supreme Court in November 2022, which remains pending; whereas he is reportedly in critical condition in prison as his health has deteriorated and he lacks sufficient food, clothing and medication;

    C. whereas other Nigerians remain imprisoned on blasphemy charges;

    D. whereas Nigeria’s blasphemy laws violate its international human rights commitments, the African Charter and the Nigerian Constitution; whereas blasphemy accusations frequently lead to harassment, violence and mob killings; whereas Nigeria is one of seven countries where an individual can be sentenced to death for blasphemy;

    E. whereas everyone has the right to freedom of expression, religion and belief;

    1. Urges the Nigerian authorities to immediately and unconditionally release Yahaya Sharif-Aminu, drop all charges against him, guarantee his safety and due process rights, and ensure adequate access to food, clothing and medical treatment; calls on the Supreme Court of Nigeria to ensure an expedited and fair appeals process; calls for the release of all others facing blasphemy allegations;

    2. Recalls that blasphemy laws are in clear breach of international human rights obligations, in particular the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, and are contrary to the Nigerian Constitution, which guarantees freedom of religion and expression;

    3. Urges the Nigerian authorities to uphold human rights throughout the country by ensuring that federal, state and Sharia laws do not deny Nigerians the protections afforded by the national constitution and international conventions; stresses Nigeria’s responsibility to lead by example in abolishing blasphemy laws, including religious insult in criminal law, that systematically endanger religious minorities, violate fundamental freedoms and fuel sectarian violence;

    4. Urges Nigeria to impose a nationwide moratorium on executions and work towards fully abolishing the death penalty;

    5. Urges the Nigerian Government to combat the impunity surrounding blasphemy accusations by penalising the purveyors of false allegations and bringing perpetrators of mob violence to justice;

    6. Calls for the EU and its Member States to raise individual cases, human rights concerns and blasphemy laws with the Nigerian authorities and to ensure the diplomatic observation of legal proceedings when Sharif-Aminu’s trial commences at the Supreme Court; commends the acquittal of Rhoda Jatau and release of Mubarak Bala;

    7. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Commission, Council, European External Action Service and VP/HR, and the Government and Parliament of Nigeria.

     

     

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: At a Glance – Council Decision (EU) 2018/994 modifying the 1976 European Electoral Act: Ratification status – 12-02-2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Council Decision (EU) 2018/994, amending the 1976 European Electoral act is not yet in force. According to Article 223 TFEU, Parliament has the exclusive right to propose amendments to the electoral rules, while the Council adopts them unanimously after Parliament’s consent. Moreover, Member States must approve those adopted rules in accordance with their constitutional requirements. However, not all Member States have ratified the Council’s 2018 decision.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Highlights – Vote on oral questions on Parenthood Regulation and EoV with Commissioner Dombrovskis – Committee on Legal Affairs

    Source: European Parliament

    On 18 February, the JURI committee will vote on the questions for oral answer to the Council and the Commission on the Adoption of the proposal for a Parenthood Regulation (2025/2545(RSP)).

    The Committee will also hear the presentation of the annual report 2024 and work programme 2025 of the EP Coordinator on Children’s Rights, Mrs Ewa Kopacz, Vice-President of the European Parliament.

    Further, the Committee will hear the reporting back on the Plenary meeting of the Observatory, EUIPO, 15-16 October 2024.

    Finally, the JURI Members will hold an exchange of views with Valdis Dombrovskis, Commissioner for Economy and Productivity, Implementation and Simplification.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Latest news – Meeting on current political situation in Gaza and West Bank- 12/02/2025 – Delegation for relations with Palestine

    Source: European Parliament

    The meeting of the Delegation for relations with Palestine took place on Wednesday, 12 February from 15.00 to 16.30, in Strasbourg, room CHURCHILL 200.

    The main subject of discussion will be an exchange of views on the current political situation in Gaza and the West Bank with Mr Michael Mann, Head of Division, Middle East – Israel, Occupied Palestinian Territories and Middle East Peace Process – EEAS.

    The meeting was web-streamed and can be accessed via the European Parliament’s Multimedia Centre.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Highlights – Structured dialogue with the Commissioner Tzitzikostas – Committee on Transport and Tourism

    Source: European Parliament

    Apostolos Tzitzikostas hearings © European Union, 2024 – EP

    Commissioner Tzitzikostas will, in the framework of the Structured Dialogue, on Wednesday 19 February update the TRAN Committee on the latest and upcoming transport-related proposals. The Commissioner will discuss with TRAN members the implications of the just published 2025 Commission Work Programme for transport policies. The debate will take place on Wednesday afternoon 19 February 2025 and will be webstreamed.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Unfair commissions on transactions for ordinary people while banks profit – E-000485/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-000485/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Lefteris Nikolaou-Alavanos (NI)

    The New Democracy Government recently put in place certain measures to reduce specific categories of fees and commissions that financial groups earn from banking transactions. These are mock interventions, since official government data reveals that the cost of reducing bank commissions amounts to only EUR 150 million per year, when, for 2023 and the 9 months from January to September 2024, these are estimated at EUR 1.8 billion. The selective zero charges for some services apply to payments made digitally, while charges for payments made at bank counters or ATMs remain in force as usual.

    In light of the above:

    • 1.What is the Commission’s position on the fact that banking groups manage to achieve high profitability, the source of which is largely fees and commissions, precisely by relying on EU directives (see Directive 2014/92/EU, etc.) that define a “reasonable fee” that institutionalises lawful speculation at the expense of ordinary families?
    • 2.What is the Commission’s position on the fact that, despite the continuous record profitability of the four systemic banking groups in Greece, they do not pay taxes, and will continue not to pay until 2041, while the four systemic banks already owe the State EUR 12.5 billion in deferred tax (paid by the people) and their shareholders received a dividend of EUR 848 million in 2023, at a tax rate of just 5%?
    • 3.What is the Commission’s position on the request to abolish all these unfair commissions on ordinary people’s transactions?

    Submitted: 4.2.2025

    Last updated: 12 February 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – EU-Algeria partnership called into question, and making aid conditional on effective migration cooperation – E-000521/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-000521/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Nadine Morano (PPE)

    On 23 January 2025, the European Parliament adopted a resolution calling for the release of the Franco-Algerian writer Boualem Sansal. In response, on 27 January, the Algerian Parliament strongly condemned this resolution, calling the concerns it expressed ‘false allegations’[1]. In addition, the day before, President Tebboune had called for a revision of the Association Agreement between Algeria and the EU[2].

    In light of that, it is perfectly reasonable for the EU to reconsider how appropriate it is to send financial aid to Algeria. Another factor is Algeria’s failure to both comply with its international commitments and cooperate effectively with Member States, particularly France, including as regards the readmission of irregular Algerian migrants subject to an ‘obligation to leave French territory’ (OQTF). In 2023, of the 25 120 Algerian nationals[3] under such an obligation, only 2 562 were deported, which is less than 10%.

    • 1.How does the Commission view Algeria not cooperating on migration even though it is granted financial support by the EU?
    • 2.Is the Commission prepared to make all EU funding conditional on Algeria making commitments regarding the readmission of irregular migrants?
    • 3.What concrete measures does the Commission plan on introducing to ensure that Algeria assumes its responsibilities with regard to the migratory pressure faced by the EU?

    Submitted: 5.2.2025

    • [1] ‘Communiqué rendu public par les deux Chambres du Parlement algérien concernant la résolution du Parlement européen’, published on 27 January 2025, https://www.apn.dz/lire-article/6939
    • [2] Le Monde, ‘L’Algérie veut revoir l’accord avec l’Union européenne sur un principe “gagnant-gagnant”’, published on 27 January 2025, https://www.lemonde.fr/afrique/article/2025/01/27/l-algerie-veut-revoir-l-accord-avec-l-union-europeenne-sur-un-principe-gagnant-gagnant_6518752_3212.html
    • [3] Eurostat, ‘First permits by reason, length of validity and citizenship’, accessed 4 February 2025, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/migr_resfirst/default/table?category=migr.migr_man.migr_res.migr_resval
    Last updated: 12 February 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Delayed evaluation report on BEREC and the BEREC Office – E-000513/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-000513/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Ondřej Krutílek (ECR)

    In accordance with Article 48 of Regulation 2018/1971 establishing BEREC and the Agency for Support for BEREC (BEREC Office), the Commission should have submitted an evaluation report on BEREC and the BEREC Office to the European Parliament by 21 December 2023. More than 13 months after the deadline laid down in the legally binding Regulation expired, Parliament has still not received this report.

    • 1.When will this report be submitted to Parliament?
    • 2.What caused the delay, and was Parliament informed of it? If so, when and how?
    • 3.What measures does the Commission intend to adopt in order to prevent similar delays lasting many months?

    Submitted: 5.2.2025

    Last updated: 12 February 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Highlights – Withdrawal of the AI Liability Directive – Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection

    Source: European Parliament

    The Commission announced that it will withdraw its legislative proposal on AI Liability. The IMCO Committee will therefore adjust its procedural calendar based on the decision of the JURI Committee that leads on this file. In the mean-time, work continues as planned in the IMCO Committee.

    However, during the presentation of the legislative proposal by the Commission on 28 January, several political groups voiced concerns about the directive’s premature timing and/or its sub-optimal alignment with the AI Act. Indeed, the IMCO rapporteur Kosma Złotowski (PL, ECR) had called for the withdrawal of the proposal.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Ensuring transparent and publicly accessible data on grid costs – E-000476/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-000476/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Sigrid Friis (Renew)

    While Eurostat provides aggregated data on energy prices, there is no publicly accessible, detailed information on network costs, such as per kilowatt-hour (kWh) pricing, making it difficult for consumers and policymakers to evaluate fairness or efficiency across regions and over time. Directive (EU) 2019/944 only requires a breakdown of energy prices, network costs and taxes on consumer bills ‘where possible’, leading to inconsistent implementation across Member States.

    How will the Commission address these gaps by:

    • 1.Ensuring public access to granular network cost data for greater accountability and equity?
    • 2.Mandating a standardised, detailed cost breakdown on consumer electricity bills that include both energy and network costs, thus fostering trust and empowering consumers?

    Submitted: 4.2.2025

    Last updated: 12 February 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Funding European competitiveness through automotive carbon credits – E-000531/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-000531/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Matthieu Valet (PfE)

    In order to comply with the emission limit restrictions forming part of the phasing out of internal combustion engine vehicles by 2035, EU regulations provide for fines for each sale of this type of vehicle that exceeds the authorised limits. These fines can be offset by the purchase of carbon credits.

    However, these credits are mainly issued by exclusively electric vehicle manufacturers, led by Chinese companies and the US company Tesla.

    This situation thus results in the European car industry indirectly subsidising its main competitors, jeopardising the competitiveness of European manufacturers.

    In view of the above:

    • 1.Has the Commission anticipated this adverse economic outcome?
    • 2.What measures are planned to avoid undermining the competitiveness of European manufacturers?

    Submitted: 5.2.2025

    Last updated: 12 February 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the further deterioration of the political situation in Georgia – RC-B10-0106/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Rasa Juknevičienė, Michael Gahler, Andrzej Halicki, Sebastião Bugalho, David McAllister, Željana Zovko, Isabel Wiseler‑Lima, Antonio López‑Istúriz White, Wouter Beke, Krzysztof Brejza, Daniel Caspary, Andrey Kovatchev, Miriam Lexmann, Reinhold Lopatka, Ana Miguel Pedro, Davor Ivo Stier, Michał Szczerba, Alice Teodorescu Måwe, Inese Vaidere, Michał Wawrykiewicz
    on behalf of the PPE Group
    Yannis Maniatis, Nacho Sánchez Amor, Tobias Cremer
    on behalf of the S&D Group
    Adam Bielan, Rihards Kols, Małgorzata Gosiewska, Mariusz Kamiński, Sebastian Tynkkynen, Veronika Vrecionová, Ondřej Krutílek, Michał Dworczyk, Roberts Zīle, Marlena Maląg, Ivaylo Valchev, Alexandr Vondra, Jadwiga Wiśniewska, Assita Kanko
    on behalf of the ECR Group
    Urmas Paet, Petras Auštrevičius, Malik Azmani, Dan Barna, Helmut Brandstätter, Benoit Cassart, Olivier Chastel, Engin Eroglu, Bernard Guetta, Karin Karlsbro, Michał Kobosko, Ilhan Kyuchyuk, Nathalie Loiseau, Jan‑Christoph Oetjen, Marie‑Agnes Strack‑Zimmermann, Eugen Tomac, Hilde Vautmans, Sophie Wilmès, Dainius Žalimas
    on behalf of the Renew Group
    Reinier Van Lanschot
    on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

    European Parliament resolution on the further deterioration of the political situation in Georgia

    (2025/2522(RSP))

    The European Parliament,

     having regard to its previous resolutions on Georgia, in particular that of 28 November 2024 on Georgia’s worsening democratic crisis following the recent parliamentary elections and alleged electoral fraud[1],

     having regard to Georgia’s status as an EU candidate country, granted by the European Council at its summit of 14 and 15 December 2023,

     having regard to Article 78 of the Georgian Constitution, which demands the implementation of all possible measures to guarantee Georgia’s complete integration into the EU and NATO,

     having regard to the final report of the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) on the parliamentary elections held in Georgia on 26 October 2024,

     having regard to Rules 136(2) and (4) of its Rules of Procedure,

    A. whereas the democratic backsliding in Georgia has dramatically accelerated since the parliamentary elections of 26 October 2024, which were deeply flawed and marked by grave irregularities, and failed to meet international democratic standards and Georgia’s OSCE commitments; whereas these elections violated the democratic norms and standards set for free and fair elections, failing to reflect the will of the people and rendering the resulting ‘parliament’, and subsequently the ‘president’, devoid of any democratic legitimacy; whereas from the very beginning of its activity, the current Georgian parliament has operated as a one-party (Georgian Dream) organ, which is incompatible with the essence of pluralistic parliamentary democracy;

    B. whereas Article 2 of the EU-Georgia Association Agreement[2] concerns the general principles of the agreement, which include democratic principles, human rights and fundamental freedoms;

    C. whereas Article 78 of the Georgian Constitution states that the constitutional bodies must take all measures within the scope of their competences to ensure the full integration of Georgia into the European Union;

    D. whereas the President of Georgia, Salome Zourabichvili, publicly condemned the parliamentary elections as rigged, declared that she would not recognise them and called for an international investigation; whereas the current Georgian regime, led by the Georgian Dream party and its founder, Bidzina Ivanishvili, has orchestrated an unconstitutional usurpation of power, systematically dismantling democratic institutions, undermining judicial independence and eroding fundamental freedoms and the rule of law, thereby deepening Georgia’s political and constitutional crisis;

    E. whereas Georgia has officially held the status of EU candidate country since December 2023; whereas on 28 November 2024, Irakli Kobakhidze announced that Georgia would delay initiating accession talks with the EU and reject its financial assistance until the end of 2028, disregarding the country’s constitutional commitment to European integration and effectively undermining Georgia’s sovereign Euro-Atlantic aspirations;

    F. whereas on 28 November 2024, peaceful mass anti-government protests began across the country, demanding new, free and fair elections, an end to political violence and repression, and the return of the country to its European path; whereas the protests have been taking place without interruption for over 75 days;

    G. whereas on 14 December 2024, the de facto parliament held a ‘presidential election’ with a single candidate from the Georgian Dream party, former footballer Mikheil Kavelashvili, elected with 224 out of 225 votes cast;

    H. whereas Georgia’s self-appointed authorities have plunged the country into a fully fledged constitutional and political crisis, as well as a human rights and democracy crisis; whereas this has been marked by the brutal repression of peaceful protesters, political opponents and media representatives, with judges, prosecutors and police officers actively fabricating politically motivated administrative and criminal charges against protesters, journalists and opposition figures detained during peaceful anti-government demonstrations; whereas, as of December 2024, more than 460 people have been arrested or punished since the protests began, with this number growing by the day;

    I. whereas riot police deliberately lacking force identification numbers have forcefully dispersed protesters with tear gas and water cannons; whereas numerous journalists have reported being targeted and beaten, and having their equipment destroyed and personal items stolen; whereas dozens of protesters have been brutally assaulted, and several hundred people have been arrested; whereas Georgia’s Public Defender has revealed that 80 % of those detained reported experiencing violence and inhumane treatment at the hands of law enforcement officers; whereas despite international condemnation, the illegitimate Georgian Government has awarded medals to officials involved in the crackdown;

    J. whereas independent media outlets, including TV Formula, TV Mtavari and TV Pirveli, face severe operational and financial constraints due to the regime’s interference, while dozens of media representatives are being subjected to various forms of intense physical and psychological pressure; whereas numerous violent attacks on journalists have been documented, including the severe beatings of Aleksandre Keshelashvili, Maka Chikhladze and Giorgi Shetsiruli, and the harassment of detained journalist Saba Kevkhishvili; whereas on 12 January 2025, the Georgian authorities arrested journalist Mzia Amaghlobeli, who has been in pre-trial detention since then and is on hunger strike in solidarity with all political prisoners in Georgia; whereas she faces between four and seven years in prison;

    K. whereas, on the night of 14 January 2025, Giorgi Gakharia, opposition leader of the For Georgia party and former Prime Minister, and Zviad Koridze, journalist and Transparency International activist, were physically assaulted by Georgian Dream officials in separate incidents at the same venue in Batumi;

    L. whereas on 2 February 2025, Nika Melia, a leader of the pro-European Akhali party, and Gigi Ugulava, the former mayor of Tbilisi, were arrested during the anti-government protests and subjected to physical violence in detention; whereas on 12 January 2025, Elene Khoshtaria, leader of the Droa political movement, was detained in Batumi;

    M. whereas the de facto Georgian authorities have used disproportionate force and excessive violence against peaceful protesters and resorted to arbitrary mass arrests to thwart dissent; whereas independent human rights organisations have reported the systemic mistreatment of detainees, including torture; whereas to date, not a single law enforcement official involved in the brutal crackdowns, arbitrary arrests and mistreatment has been brought to justice;

    N. whereas the self-appointed authorities introduced new draconian legislation that came into force on 30 December 2024 and amended the Criminal Code, the Code of Administrative Offences and the Law on Assemblies and Manifestations, imposing further arbitrary restrictions on the rights to freedom of expression and peaceful assembly, introducing, among other things, hefty fines for putting up protest slogans and posters, and granting police the power to detain individuals ‘preventively’ for 48 hours on suspicion of planning to violate the rules governing public assembly; whereas on 3 February 2025, the Georgian Dream party unveiled further draft legislation designed to tighten control, ramping up penalties for a variety of offences directly targeting protestors, critics and political dissent, such as harsher punishments for ‘insulting officials’, the criminalisation of road blocks and an increase in the duration of administrative detention from 15 to 60 days;

    O. whereas on 27 January 2025, the Council decided to suspend parts of the EU-Georgia visa facilitation agreement for Georgian diplomats and officials, but failed to impose individual sanctions in response to the continued crackdown; whereas the Hungarian and Slovak Governments have been consistently blocking impactful EU-wide sanctions, preventing the remaining 25 Member States (EU-25) from effectively introducing sanctions against the self-appointed Georgian authorities;

    P. whereas several Member States, including Lithuania, Estonia, Latvia and Czechia, have imposed bilateral sanctions on some Georgian politicians, judges and other officials responsible for the brutal crackdown on protesters, violations of human rights and abuse of the rule of law; whereas in December 2024, the United States sanctioned Bidzina Ivanishvili, alongside Georgia’s ‘Minister of Internal Affairs’ Vakhtang Gomelauri and Deputy Head of the Special Tasks Department Mirza Kezevadze, for their involvement in brutal crackdowns on media representatives, opposition figures and protesters; whereas the UK and Ukraine have imposed similar sanctions on high-level Georgian officials; whereas Ivanishvili, through hastily adopted laws tailored to his personal situation, is moving his offshore assets to Georgia in anticipation of further sanctions;

    Q. whereas on 29 January 2025, Georgian Dream announced that it would withdraw its delegation from the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE) after it demanded new, genuinely democratic parliamentary elections, the release of political prisoners and accountability for perpetrators of violence; whereas UN experts have condemned the pattern of repression and human rights violations in Georgia, while the OSCE has called this suppression a serious breach of the right to freedom of assembly;

    R. whereas the ruling Georgian Dream party convened the new parliament in violation of the country’s constitution, resulting in a boycott of parliament by the opposition; whereas on 5 February 2025, the self-appointed ‘parliament’ voted to approve the early termination of the mandates of 49 out of 61 members of parliament, representing the Coalition for Change, Strong Georgia and the United National Movement, in order to strip them of their immunity and facilitate their arrest and prosecution; whereas the same ‘parliament’ established a commission to punish former ruling party United National Movement;

    S. whereas a growing number of civil servants have been dismissed after speaking out against the halting of Georgia’s EU accession process; whereas Georgian Dream has amended laws on public service, simplifying procedures to dismiss public servants, several of whom have been dismissed for participating in protests, in a clear attempt to silence critical voices;

    1. Condemns the Georgian Dream ‘authorities’ and urges them to immediately cease the violent repression of peaceful protesters, political opponents and media representatives; underlines that Georgia’s self-appointed authorities are currently violating fundamental freedoms, basic human rights and the core international obligations of the country, thereby undermining decades of democratic reforms driven by the country’s political class and civil society; considers Georgia as a state captured by the illegitimate Georgian Dream regime; expresses deep regret over the fact that the ruling Georgian Dream party has abandoned its path towards European integration and NATO membership; recalls that the ongoing democratic backsliding and adoption of anti-democratic laws has effectively suspended Georgia’s EU integration process; reiterates its unwavering support for the Georgian people’s legitimate European aspirations and their wish to live in a prosperous and democratic country;

    2. Does not recognise the self-proclaimed authorities of the Georgian Dream party established following the rigged election of 26 October 2024, which was neither free nor fair, was held in violation of democratic norms and standards, and did not reflect the will of the people of Georgia; underlines that the extensive electoral fraud has undermined the integrity of the election process, cast doubt on the legitimacy of the result and eroded public trust, both domestically and internationally, in any new government;

    3. Calls for the EU and its Member States, as well as national parliaments and interparliamentary institutions, not to recognise the legitimacy of the Georgian Dream one-party parliament and their appointed president; calls, therefore, on the international community to join the boycott of the self-proclaimed Georgian authorities;

    4. Continues to recognise Salome Zourabichvili as the legitimate President of Georgia and representative of the Georgian people; praises her efforts to peacefully steer the country back towards a democratic and European path of development; calls on the President of the European Council to invite President Zourabichvili to represent Georgia at an upcoming European Council meeting and at the next European Political Community summit;

    5. Underlines that the settlement of the current political and constitutional crisis in Georgia can only be achieved by way of new parliamentary elections; demands that new elections take place in Georgia within the next few months in an improved electoral environment, overseen by an independent and impartial election administration and monitored through diligent international observation to guarantee a genuinely fair, free and transparent process; encourages the Member States and EU officials to firmly demand new elections and to make any future engagement explicitly conditional on setting a new date for parliamentary elections and establishing a mechanism to ensure they are free and fair;

    6. Calls on the Council and the Member States, particularly the EU-25 on a bilateral and coordinated basis, to impose immediate and targeted personal sanctions on Bidzina Ivanishvili, his family and his companies, and to freeze all his assets within the EU for his role in the deterioration of the political process in Georgia, enabling democratic backsliding and acting against the country’s constitutionally declared interests of Euro-Atlantic integration; calls on the French Government to strip Bidzina Ivanishvili of the Legion of Honour and impose individual sanctions on him; welcomes, in this regard, the sanctions imposed bilaterally by Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Czechia, as well as those already imposed by the US and the UK;

    7. Calls for the EU and its Member States, in particular the EU-25 on a bilateral and coordinated basis, to impose personal sanctions on the officials and political leaders in Georgia responsible for democratic backsliding, electoral fraud, human rights violations and the persecution of political opponents and activists, including Irakli Kobakhidze, Shalva Papuashvili, Vakhtang Gomelauri, Mayor of Tbilisi and Secretary General of the ruling Georgian Dream party Kakha Kaladze, and Chair of the Georgian Dream party Irakli Garibashvili; calls for them to extend these sanctions to judges, including those of the Constitutional Court of Georgia who are passing politically motivated sentences, and representatives of the law enforcement services, as well as to financial enablers tacitly or openly supporting the regime and the owners of regime-aligned media outlets, including TV Imedi, Pos TV and Rustavi 2 TV, for their role in spreading disinformation and seeking to manipulate public discourse in order to sustain the current ruling party’s authoritarian rule;

    8. Calls on the Council and the Member States to impose sanctions on Bidzina Ivanishvili’s network of enablers, elite entourage, corrupt financial operatives, propagandists and those facilitating the repressive state apparatus, including, among others, Ekaterine Khvedelidze, Uta Ivanishvili, Tsotne Ivanishvili, Bera Ivanishvili, Gvantsa Ivanishvili, Alexander Ivanishvili, Shmagi Kobakhidze, Ucha Mamatsashvili, Natia Turnava, Ivane Chkhartishvili, Sulkhan Papashvili, Giorgi Kapanadze, Tornike Rizhvadze, Ilia Tsulaia, Kakha Bekauri, Lasha Natsvlishvili, Vasil Maglaperidze, Grigol Liluashvili, Mikheil Chinchaladze, Levan Murusidze, Irakli Rukhadze, Tinatin Berdzenishvili, Tamaz Gaiashvili, Anton Obolashvili and Gocha Enukidze;

    9. Maintains the view that the measures taken so far by the EU in response to the flagrant democratic backsliding and reneging on previous commitments does not yet fully reflect the severity of the situation in Georgia and the latest developments; welcomes the Council’s decision to suspend visa-free travel for Georgian diplomats and officials, but considers it as only a first step, which must be followed by tougher measures; deplores the obstruction by the Hungarian and Slovak Governments of the Council decisions on introducing sanctions against individuals responsible for democratic backsliding in Georgia;

    10. Emphasises that respect for fundamental rights is vital to the EU’s visa liberalisation benchmarks; reiterates its call on the Commission and the Council to review Georgia’s visa-free status, with the possibility of suspension if it is considered that EU standards on democratic governance and freedoms are not being upheld;

    11. Strongly condemns the brutal violence and repression used by Georgia’s ruling regime against peaceful protesters since 28 November 2024; calls for the immediate and unconditional release of all political prisoners and those detained during the anti-government protests; demands the release of journalist Mzia Amaghlobeli, who has been on hunger strike for over four weeks now because of her unjust detention and risks facing critical, irreversible and life-threatening consequences; denounces the assault and beating of former Prime Minister Giorgi Gakharia, resulting in his hospitalisation, followed by the arrest on 2 February 2025 of political leaders including Nika Melia and Gigi Ugulava, as a shocking escalation of state-orchestrated violence by Georgian Dream and its allies against peaceful demonstrators and political opponents; reminds of the detention of Elene Khoshtaria on 12 January 2025 in Batumi; 

    12. Reiterates its solidarity with the people of Georgia and its vibrant civil society in fighting for their legitimate democratic rights and for a European future for their country; urges the Georgian Government to reverse its current political course and return to implementing the will of the Georgian people for continued democratic reforms that would reopen the prospect of future EU membership;

    13. Strongly condemns the enactment of draconian legislation that imposes unjustified restrictions on freedoms of expression and peaceful assembly, and demands the annulment of such recently adopted repressive legislation; urges the Georgian authorities to immediately and unconditionally release all individuals detained for peacefully exercising their fundamental rights to freedoms of expression and peaceful assembly, and to ensure prompt, thorough and impartial investigations into all allegations of unlawful and disproportionate use of force by the law enforcement agencies; considers that the Georgian justice system has been weaponised to stifle dissent, instil fear and silence free speech;

    14. Calls for the ‘Georgian authorities’ to take immediate action to ensure the safety and freedom of journalists and to investigate all instances of violence and misconduct by law enforcement agencies; emphasises the importance of fostering a democratic environment where media, civil society and the opposition can operate freely without fear of retaliation or censorship;

    15. Demands an independent, transparent and impartial investigation into police brutality and the excessive use of force against peaceful demonstrators; calls for those responsible for human rights violations, including law enforcement and government officials ordering acts of repression, to be held fully accountable before the law;

    16. Denounces the launch of an investigation by the Prosecutor’s Office on 8 February 2025 into non-governmental organisations accused of aggravated sabotage, attempted sabotage and assisting foreign and foreign-controlled organisations in hostile activities aimed at undermining the state interests of Georgia, for which they could receive multiple-year sentences; views this action as further escalation of repression by the regime, misuse of the judicial system and accelerated democratic backsliding;

    17. Condemns the broader campaign of attacks by the Georgian authorities vilifying civil society organisations and reputable international donors that support democracy, the rule of law and the protection of human rights in Georgia;

    18. Denounces the termination by Georgian Dream of the mandates of 49 opposition members of parliament as a sign of further democratic backsliding, and considers this the latest move in Georgian Dream’s attack on political pluralism in the country;

    19. Welcomes PACE’s decision to challenge the credentials of Georgia’s parliamentary delegation due to democratic backsliding and human rights abuses; supports PACE’s call for Georgia to immediately initiate an inclusive process involving all political and social actors, including the ruling party, the opposition and civil society, to urgently address the deficiencies and shortcomings noted during the recent parliamentary elections and to create an electoral environment conducive to new, genuinely democratic elections to be announced in the coming months;

    20. Notes that Georgia, once a front runner for Euro-Atlantic integration, is undergoing an accelerated process of democratic backsliding, in a seemingly deliberate attempt to demonstrate that the will of the Georgian people no longer determines the country’s future, which could result in the country taking the Belarussian path of political development, transitioning from the current authoritarian state to a dictatorial regime;

    21. Deplores the decision of Irakli Kobakhidze to suspend accession talks and reject EU funding until the end of 2028; recalls that all polls consistently show the overwhelming support of the Georgian population for a Euro-Atlantic future; expresses strong support for the Euro-Atlantic aspirations of the Georgian people;

    22. Calls for an immediate and comprehensive audit of EU policy towards Georgia due to the democratic backsliding; calls on the Commission to review the EU-Georgia Association Agreement in the light of the self-declared Georgian authorities’ breach of the general principles, as laid down in Article 2, namely respect for democratic principles, the rule of law and fundamental freedoms; points out that non-fulfilment of obligations may result in the conditional suspension of economic cooperation and privileges afforded by the Agreement;

    23. Welcomes the Commission’s decision to cease all budgetary support to the Georgian authorities and to suspend the initiation of any future investment projects; encourages the Commission to terminate all financial support for ongoing projects; calls for a moratorium on all investment projects in the field of connectivity; calls on the Commission to start identifying economic sectors of relevance to the oligarchic interests that support and sustain the current authoritarian rule, with a view to a potential future decision about restrictive measures or economic sanctions; calls on the Commission to start identifying connectivity projects that support and sustain the current authoritarian rule and to consider their suspension until a rerun of the parliamentary elections;

    24. Condemns the climate of intimidation and polarisation fuelled by statements by Georgian Government representatives and political leaders, as well as by attacks against political pluralism, including through disturbing cases of intimidation and violence against the Georgian democratic political forces and repeated threats to ban opposition parties, to arrest their leaders and even ordinary supporters, and to silence dissent; underlines that anything but the full restoration of Georgia’s democratic standards will entail a further deterioration of EU-Georgia relations, make any move towards EU accession impossible and result in additional sanctions;

    25. Calls on the Commission to swiftly redirect the frozen EUR 120 million originally intended as support for the Georgian authorities to enhance the EU’s support for Georgia’s civil society, in particular the non-governmental sector and independent media, which are increasingly coming under undue pressure from the ruling political party and the authorities, as well as to support programmes supporting democratic resilience and electoral integrity; calls for the EU’s funding mechanisms to be adjusted to take into account the needs that arise in a more hostile and anti-democratic environment; highlights the urgency of the need to support civil society in the light of growing repression and the suspension of activities of the US Agency for International Development (USAID), and therefore urges the Commission to ramp up support without delay;

    26. Expresses deep concern about the increasing Russian influence in the country and about the Georgian Dream government’s actions in pursuing a policy of rapprochement and collaboration with Russia, in spite of its creeping occupation of Georgian territory; deplores, in this regard, the growing anti-Western and hostile rhetoric of the Georgian Dream party’s representatives towards Georgia’s strategic Western partners, including the EU, and its MEPs and officials, and Georgian Dream’s promotion of Russian disinformation and manipulation;

    27. Strongly reiterates its urgent demand for the immediate release of former President Mikheil Saakashvili on humanitarian grounds, specifically for the purpose of seeking medical treatment abroad; emphasises that the self-appointed authorities bear full and undeniable responsibility for the life, health, safety and well-being of former President Mikheil Saakashvili and must be held fully accountable for any harm that befalls him;

    28. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, the Council, the Commission, the governments and parliaments of the Member States, the Council of Europe, the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe and the self-appointed authorities of Georgia.

     

     

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Environmental catastrophe along the Gorzente stream – E-000477/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-000477/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Gaetano Pedulla’ (The Left)

    The ongoing unplanned maintenance work to the dam in the Lavagnina reservoir in the municipality of Casaleggio Boiro (Alessandria) caused in June 2024 a large volume of mud to spill from the base of the dam into the water courses downstream, something not foreseen in the initial project.

    Both the dam and the Gorzente, an intermittent stream downstream of it, form part of site of community importance (SCI)/special protection area (SPA) IT1180026 ‘Capanne di Marcarolo’, which is part of the Natura 2000 network, protected by the Habitats and Birds Directives, and declared a special area of conservation (SAC) by the ministerial decree of 21 November 2017.

    Given that this sludge spillage, caused by work subsidised from the EU’s development and cohesion funds, has seriously damaged the environment – causing significant harm to river fauna, as documented by complaints from two citizens’ committees and two local ‘Legambiente’ pro-environment associations – while the local authorities have stood idly by, can the Commission say whether:

    • 1.The maintenance work on the Lavagnina dam was carried out in accordance with the EU standards set out in the Habitats and Birds Directives, given that the work was carried out with EU funding?
    • 2.It intends to hold the local authorities to account by requesting an independent scientific report on the environmental and economic damage caused and on how to remedy it?
    • 3.It intends to ensure that any future measures requested by the Commission are actually carried out?

    Submitted: 4.2.2025

    Last updated: 12 February 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Revision of the EU Treaties and inclusion of an opt-out clause on migration – E-000479/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-000479/2025
    to the Council
    Rule 144
    Jean-Paul Garraud (PfE)

    In view of the growing challenges of migration, several Member States have expressed their desire to have more flexibility in implementing EU policies, in particular through the introduction of opt-out mechanisms. These mechanisms would allow a Member State to opt out of some EU legislation, without leaving the EU.

    This would mean that better account could be taken of national circumstances, while maintaining constructive cooperation at EU level.

    • 1.Does the Council plan to open discussions on a possible revision of the EU Treaties, particularly in view of the current political and social developments in the EU?
    • 2.Could the possibility of including an opt-out mechanism on migration, which would allow Member States to opt out of certain common obligations while respecting their national constraints and priorities, be considered in this revision?
    • 3.What mechanisms or conditions could the Council propose to facilitate the inclusion of opt-out clauses in the field of migration, to deliver on the Member States’ expectations while preserving the coherence of EU policies?

    Submitted: 4.2.2025

    Last updated: 12 February 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Support for mastic producers – E-000481/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-000481/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Georgios Aftias (PPE)

    Mastic is a special product produced on the island of Chios, in Greece. The cultivation of this product is difficult and takes place from July to October. The total quantity produced extends to 200 tonnes, most of which is exported to 55 countries. Mastic producers are facing huge losses in their economic activity due to weather phenomena. It is noted that this sector is crucial for the island, since it employs more than 2 500 people, thus constituting the main economic pillar of the island.

    On the basis of this data:

    • 1.With what financial instruments can the Commission financially support mastic producers?
    • 2.Can the damage be repaired through the European Solidarity Fund?
    • 3.How can production of the product, which is declining due to climate change, be boosted?

    Submitted: 4.2.2025

    Last updated: 12 February 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Delayed evaluation report on the functioning of ENISA and the European cybersecurity certification framework – E-000510/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-000510/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Ondřej Krutílek (ECR)

    In accordance with Article 67 of the Cybersecurity Act (Regulation 2019/881), the Commission should have submitted an evaluation report on the functioning of ENISA and the European cybersecurity certification framework to the European Parliament by 28 June 2024. More than seven months after the deadline laid down in the legally binding Regulation expired, Parliament has still not received this report.

    • 1.When will this report be submitted to Parliament?
    • 2.What caused the delay, and was Parliament informed of it? If so, when and how?
    • 3.What measures does the Commission intend to adopt in order to prevent similar delays lasting many months?

    Submitted: 5.2.2025

    Last updated: 12 February 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Meta social media platforms – E-000526/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-000526/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Kathleen Funchion (The Left), Lynn Boylan (The Left)

    Meta social media platforms, such as Instagram, have begun to hide search results for hashtags such the ‘#TheLeft’. This coincides with Meta social media platforms, such as Facebook and Instagram, announcing that they will cease fact-checking, thus allowing harmful and untrue content to circulate.

    Given the gravity of these new policies:

    • 1.Can the Commission outline in detail what actions it intends to take to protect the freedom to be heard of legitimate political movements?
    • 2.What actions will the Commission take to ensure that Meta does not permit the publication of false and harmful content on its platforms?

    Submitted: 5.2.2025

    Last updated: 12 February 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – US AI chip export restrictions: a challenge to EU unity and technological sovereignty – E-000483/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-000483/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Virginijus Sinkevičius (Verts/ALE), Alexandra Geese (Verts/ALE), Anna Cavazzini (Verts/ALE), Adam Jarubas (PPE), Mārtiņš Staķis (Verts/ALE), Kim Van Sparrentak (Verts/ALE), Reinier Van Lanschot (Verts/ALE), Pierre Jouvet (S&D), Sara Matthieu (Verts/ALE), Vilija Blinkevičiūtė (S&D), Dainius Žalimas (Renew), David Cormand (Verts/ALE), Benedetta Scuderi (Verts/ALE), Paulo Cunha (PPE), Irena Joveva (Renew), Alex Agius Saliba (S&D), Elena Sancho Murillo (S&D), Magdalena Adamowicz (PPE)

    The recent US decision to impose export restrictions on advanced AI chips has created a significant challenge for the EU’s single market and technological sovereignty. By categorising Member States into different tiers, with some countries facing caps on AI chip imports, the United States has effectively fragmented the EU’s unified approach to AI development. This decision is particularly concerning given the US’s status as a strategic partner and the EU’s reliance on US-made AI chips. It is crucial to engage with the new US administration to seek a unified treatment of the EU as a bloc.

    How will the Commission address this challenge and what concrete steps will it take to:

    • 1.mitigate the potential negative impacts on EU countries facing export caps, ensuring solidarity with, and support for, those Member States whose access to these critical technologies has been restricted?
    • 2.accelerate the development of the EU’s domestic AI chip production capabilities to reduce dependence on external suppliers?
    • 3.create the legal conditions for a unified EU export control regime in the framework of the review of the Dual Use Export Control Regulation[1] in order to deny third country actors the possibility to divide the Member States?

    Submitted: 4.2.2025

    • [1] Regulation (EU) 2021/821 of 20 May 2021 setting up a Union regime for the control of exports, brokering, technical assistance, transit and transfer of dual-use items, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2021/821/oj.
    Last updated: 12 February 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Ukraine: The Federal Council adopts the 15th EU sanctions package

    Source: Switzerland – Department of Foreign Affairs in English

    On 12 February, the Federal Council decided to adopt the measures of the 15th EU sanctions package against Russia. These measures will come into force on 13 February. On 23 December 2024, 54 individuals and 30 entities had already been added to Switzerland’s sanctions list against Russia.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: European Union to support the development of a new multipurpose seaport on Kiritimati Island

    Source: European Investment Bank

    • EIB Global, with €2.5 million (AUD 4.1 million) in EU-backed technical assistance, will oversee the feasibility study to assess the construction of a multipurpose seaport and wave breaker.
    • The study will evaluate the project’s technical, environmental and social viability for implementation on Kiritimati (Christmas) Island, Kiribati.
    • This initiative is a key part of the EU’s Global Gateway strategy, enhancing infrastructure and connectivity in the Pacific region.
    • Upon completion, EIB Global, alongside development partners, will consider the project for potential financing.

    The European Investment Bank (EIB Global) and the Delegation of the European Union to the Pacific have signed a €2.5 million (AUD 4.1 million) contribution agreement to provide technical assistance for a feasibility assessment of the construction and operation of a multipurpose seaport and wave breaker on Kiritimati (Christmas) Island, Kiribati, in the Pacific Ocean.

    Managed by EIB Global, this EU-funded technical assistance will finance feasibility, environmental and social studies to assess the port’s viability and potential impact, while identifying solutions to enhance maritime infrastructure to support fishing vessel transshipment, commercial container shipping, and tourism. The initiative aims to strengthen trade connectivity, drive sustainable economic growth and improve climate resilience in the region.

    This initiative aligns with the European Union’s Global Gateway strategy, which aims to enhance connectivity between Europe and key global regions. The new port will strengthen Kiribati’s role as a strategic trade hub and support the development of essential logistics and transportation infrastructure, driving economic growth and regional integration.

    EIB Vice-President Ambroise Fayolle, who is in charge of EIB operations in the Pacific, said: “The European Investment Bank is proud to support Kiribati in exploring the potential of a new multipurpose seaport on Kiritimati Island. This project reflects our strong commitment to combating climate change and enhancing sustainable infrastructure and connectivity in the Pacific region under the European Union’s Global Gateway strategy. By assessing the technical, environmental and social feasibility of the port, we aim to lay the groundwork for improved trade opportunities, economic growth and climate resilience. We look forward to working closely with our partners to bring this initiative to fruition.”

    The Ambassador of the European Union to the Pacific, Her Excellency Barbara Plinkert said: “The European Union is committed to fostering sustainable development and regional connectivity, and the Kiritimati Island seaport project is a significant step towards achieving these goals. Through the European Union’s Global Gateway initiative, we support infrastructure that strengthens trade and enhances climate resilience in the Pacific. This feasibility study, supported by EIB Global, exemplifies our collaborative approach with partners to support the advancement of the 2050 Strategy for the Blue Pacific Continent and build a more interconnected, resilient and prosperous Pacific region.”

    Background information:

    The European Investment Bank (ElB) is the long-term lending institution of the European Union, owned by its Member States. It finances investments that contribute to EU policy objectives.

    EIB Global is the EIB Group’s specialised arm devoted to increasing the impact of international partnerships and development finance, and a key partner in Global Gateway. We aim to support €100 billion of investment by the end of 2027, around one third of the overall target of this EU initiative. With Team Europe, EIB Global fosters strong, focused partnerships, alongside fellow development finance institutions and civil society. EIB Global brings the EIB Group closer to people, companies and institutions through our offices around the world.

    Global Gateway is the European Union’s strategy to reduce the worldwide investment gap, boost smart, clean and secure connections in the digital, energy and transport sectors, and strengthen health, education and research systems. The Global Gateway strategy embodies a Team Europe approach that brings together the European Union, EU Member States and European development finance institutions. It aims to mobilise up to €300 billion in public and private investments between 2021 and 2027, creating essential links rather than dependencies, and closing the global investment gap.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Highlights – 19-20 February: US trade relations, Export Controls, WTO, Singapore, Switzerland – Committee on International Trade

    Source: European Parliament

    On 19-20 February INTA Members will exchange with DG Trade Deputy Director General Rubinacci on the latest development in EU-US trade relations, including the announced US decision to impose tariffs on European steel and aluminum exports and the EU response.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Highlights – Debate with Mr O’Flaherty, Commissioner for Human Rights, Council of Europe – Subcommittee on Human Rights

    Source: European Parliament

    Elected in 2024, Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights Michael O’Flaherty will hold his first debate with DROI Members on 18 February, from 15.00 to 16.00. This exchange is part of DROI’s round of initial contacts with its main institutional counterparts on the human rights’ international stage. Topics such as the war in Ukraine and the fight against impunity, respect for human rights in the context of asylum and migration and attacks to the Rule of Law in Europe will be discussed.

    Mr O’Flaherty is a long-standing human rights advocate and lawyer, who has been heard in Parliament on several occasion under his previous responsibilities as Director of the EU Fundamental Rights Agency (2015-2023). He is the fifth Commissioner for Human Rights of the Council of Europe. The Commissioner’s mandate lasts for six years and is non-renewable.

    The Commissioner for Human Rights is an independent and impartial non-judicial institution established in 1999 by the Council of Europe to promote awareness of and respect for human rights in the 46 Council of Europe member states. Laid out in Resolution (99) 50 on the Council of Europe, the Commissioner’s mandate crosses DROI responsibilities and is a major inter-institutional interlocutor to the subcommittee.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: India’s Cultural Influence Across the Indian Ocean Region Stems from its rich Cultural, Intellectual and Knowledge Traditions: Union Minister Shri Gajendra Singh Shekhawat

    Source: Government of India

    India’s Cultural Influence Across the Indian Ocean Region Stems from its rich Cultural, Intellectual and Knowledge Traditions: Union Minister Shri Gajendra Singh Shekhawat

    From Ancient Trade Winds to Modern Maritime Security:  ‘Monsoon’ Conference Explores India’s Expanding Indian Ocean Role

    Posted On: 12 FEB 2025 9:42PM by PIB Delhi

    In the backdrop of India’s growing maritime partnerships and security initiatives, the Indira Gandhi National Centre for the Arts (IGNCA) is organizing a two-day international conference in collaboration with the Advanced Study Institute of Asia ( ASIA) at SGT University titled ‘Monsoon: The Sphere of Cultural and Trade Influence’. ‘Project Mausam’, is an Indian transnational initiative under the Ministry of Culture. This conference, exploring historical and cultural connections among Indian Ocean nations through maritime interactions, will highlight India’s central role in shaping trade, traditions, and connectivity across the Indian Ocean Region (IOR). The inaugural session of the conference began today at IGNCA, New Delhi, and will continue until 13th February 2025. Shri Gajendra Singh Shekhawat, Union Minister Minister of Culture and Tourism, graced the occasion as the Chief Guest, with a keynote address by Dr. Vinay Sahasrabuddhe and a welcome address by Dr. Sachchidanand Joshi, Member Secretary, IGNCA. Prof. Amogh Rai, Research Director, ASIA, SGT University, and Dr. Ajith Kumar, Director of Project Mausam, were also present during the inaugural session.

    Union Minister of Culture and Tourism, Shri Gajendra Singh Shekhawat, while speaking at the inaugural session, highlighted the deep interlinkages between India and the region, emphasising that India’s cultural influence across the Indian Ocean Region stems from its rich cultural, intellectual, and knowledge traditions. He noted that this influence stemmed not only from commerce and trade but also from India’s intellectual prowess and golden prosperity. He remarked that the footprints of India’s cultural impact are visible among those who came as students, monks, or even as aggressors, carrying with them the essence of India’s cultural progress, fostering diversity and unity over thousands of years. He also spoke about the unique vision of ‘Project Mausam’ to showcase a Transnational Mixed Route of Natural and Cultural Heritage, stating, “The world realises that culture is the factor that unites us all.”

    The initiative is particularly timely, as India and France recently concluded their Maritime Cooperation Dialogue in New Delhi, agreeing on joint measures to assess and counter threats to maritime security in the IOR. These threats include piracy, maritime terrorism, smuggling, illegal fishing, hybrid and cyber threats, and marine pollution. Oman will also be hosting the 8th edition of the Indian Ocean Conference from February 16-17, focusing on ‘Voyages to New Horizons of Maritime Partnership’. Simultaneously, the Indian Navy’s 2025 capstone Theatre Level Operational Exercise (TROPEX) is underway, showcasing India’s preparedness in the Indian Ocean.

    ‘Project Mausam’ not only emphasizes India’s historical maritime influence but also resonates with the nation’s evolving geopolitical strategy in the region. The conference will focus on key themes such as ancient navigational routes, port city networks, and coastal settlements. By integrating tangible and intangible cultural heritage, the project highlights India’s continued leadership in fostering connectivity and maritime partnerships, contributing to UNESCO’s maritime heritage studies.

    Dr. Vinay Sahasrabuddhe in his address emphasised the cultural foundations of India-Southeast Asia relations, calling for intellectual and emotional investment to integrate Southeast Asia into India’s popular consciousness. Noting that cultural bonds need revitalisation, he highlighted the monsoon as a symbol of enduring connections and urged moving beyond Eurocentric perspectives. He advocated deepening cultural engagement through the Act East policy to ‘Attract East’ by strengthening cultural, strategic, and economic ties. He also called for reinforcing Dharma-Dhamma relations, reviving shared epics, promoting collaborative art and craft, advancing educational and technological exchanges, addressing climate change, and building linguistic bridges.

    Dr. Sachchidanand Joshi said that IGNCA’s area studies in South and Central Asia led to the development of Vrihattar Bharat to explore cultural routes and linkages, expanding beyond the initially identified 39 countries. He noted that over 70 countries share cultural heritage with India. Emphasising international cooperation, as reflected in the G20 summit’s motto, ‘Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam’, he highlighted that IGNCA’s efforts were ongoing, with the conference serving as a catalyst to expand these studies.

    Prof. Amogh Rai expressed his views on the monsoon as both a physical and cultural force, highlighting its role as a cultural multiplier and the conference’s potential for further research. Dr. Ajith Kumar concluded the inaugural session by extending a formal vote of thanks and emphasising the cultural unity between India and Southeast Asian countries.

    IGNCA’s international conference aims to foster deeper cultural diplomacy, with academic collaborations and heritage conservation paving the way for future policy dialogues. This dialogue aligns seamlessly with India’s evolving maritime strategies and international partnerships.

    ***

    Sunil Kumar Tiwari

    pibculture[at]gmail[dot]com

    (Release ID: 2102534) Visitor Counter : 16

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News