Category: Europe

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Mandatory declaration of origin for rice – E-002605/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002605/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Cristina Maestre (S&D), Leire Pajín (S&D), Sandra Gómez López (S&D)

    According to Eurobarometer, the vast majority of people in the EU would like to know where their food comes from. For rice, the current labelling rules make it easier for some traders to deliberately confuse consumers about the quality and origin of the product.

    One example of this is a well-known distributor of short-grain rice that sells the product with labels bearing images that evoke Valencian rice-growing traditions and displays its address in Valencia but not the origin of the product. The traceability study carried out by the Government of the Autonomous Community of Valencia found that it was rice imported from third countries.

    The voluntary nature of the indication of origin on rice labelling allows for a whole range of misleading practices for consumers and causes serious harm to the EU rice sector. European rice growers are calling for greater distinction to be drawn between their product and lower-quality imports from South-East Asia.

    Given the difficult situation this sector is going through:

    What is the reason for keeping the voluntary nature of origin labelling for rice, when it is already mandatory for many other agricultural products?

    Submitted: 27.6.2025

    Last updated: 4 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – SAFE in name only: the EU regulation that will be paid for by ordinary people in blood, money, new and major sacrifices and significant adversities – E-002579/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002579/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Kostas Papadakis (NI)

    The introduction of the SAFE Regulation is evidence of the EU’s deeper involvement in dangerous war planning and a shift to the ‘war economy’, in the context of competition with Russia, China and the US. The regulation envisages the participation of ‘like-minded third countries’, such as Türkiye – a country which challenges the borders and sovereign rights of Member States such as Greece, while occupying 37 % of the territory of Cyprus without recognising it.

    In view of this, can the Commission say:

    • 1.What view does it take of the fact that the SAFE Regulation intensifies competition between the EU and China, Russia and the US, promoting dangerous planning and a deeper involvement in war, actions which are already jeopardising – and harming – the safety ordinary people?
    • 2.What view does it take of the need – which is at odds with the EU’s war economy plans – to raise salaries and pensions, to reinstate 13th and 14th salaries and pensions for public sector employees and to increase health, education and welfare expenditure in order to meet the needs of workers rather than to finance groups in the EU’s war industry, which, through their dangerous planning, create new avenues for profit, with unpredictable risks for ordinary people?
    • 3.What view does it take of the fact that the SAFE Regulation involves so-called ‘third countries’, including Ukraine on the grounds of Russia’s invasion and occupation of its territories, while Türkiye – a country which has, among other things, invaded and occupied territories of Cyprus, an EU Member State, since 1974 and which challenges the borders and sovereign rights of Greece – is participating in the same programme?

    Submitted: 26.6.2025

    Last updated: 4 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Compliance with the EU’s Extractive Waste Directive and the treatment of mining waste in Finland – E-002602/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002602/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Maria Ohisalo (Verts/ALE)

    In the EU, the management of waste from the extractive industries is governed by legislation based on the Extractive Waste Directive, under which Member States must ensure that extractive waste is managed without endangering human health and without using methods which could harm the environment, in particular water, air, soil, fauna and flora – also after mining has ceased[1].

    In Finland, hazardous waste from mines is often dealt with inadequately and the long-term effects of mining waste are not properly assessed. For example, Terrafame’s mine has produced huge areas of waste rock, which pose a risk of major accidents[2] – hazardous substances could leach into watercourses when it rains on the masses of waste rock[3].

    Extractive waste can be hazardous for the environment over hundreds of years. Although the masses of waste rock at Terrafame’s mine are set to be covered in summer 2025, the plans for the safe treatment of mining waste once mining activities have ceased are inadequate, and in this respect are in breach of the EU’s Extractive Waste Directive.

    In addition, mines are increasingly being established in areas with fewer mineral deposits, meaning that mining generates more waste rock and waste in general and may not even be economically viable. This problem is a relevant one because the expansion of Terrafame’s mine has been selected as a strategic project under the Critical Raw Materials Act[4].

    How will the Commission ensure that the Member States comply with the Extractive Waste Directive, especially after mining activities have ceased?

    Submitted: 27.6.2025

    • [1] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32006L0021
    • [2] https://yle.fi/a/74-20168383
    • [3] https://www.sll.fi/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/kaivosjateraportti_natunensll_2022.docx-1-1.pdf
    • [4] https://single-market-economy.ec.europa.eu/sectors/raw-materials/areas-specific-interest/critical-raw-materials/strategic-projects-under-crma/selected-projects_en
    Last updated: 4 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Highlights – REGI – Presentation of ECA Special report 16/2025 – 15.07.25 – Committee on Regional Development

    Source: European Parliament

    A wildfire consuming a green forest © Image used under the license of Adobe stock images.

    The Committee on Regional Development will have a presentation of the ECA Special Report 16/2025 on EU funding to tackle forest fires – more preventative measures, but insufficient evidence of results and their long-term sustainability by Nikolaos Milionis at its meeting on Tuesday 15 July 2025.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Working conditions of doctors in Europe – E-002607/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002607/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Raffaele Topo (S&D), Alessandra Moretti (S&D), Elisabetta Gualmini (S&D), Brando Benifei (S&D), Pina Picierno (S&D), Pierfrancesco Maran (S&D), Stefano Bonaccini (S&D), Antonio Decaro (S&D), Giuseppe Lupo (S&D), Romana Jerković (S&D), Estelle Ceulemans (S&D), Dario Tamburrano (The Left), Kateřina Konečná (NI), Branislav Ondruš (NI), Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă (NI), Flavio Tosi (PPE), Sebastian Everding (The Left), Aurelijus Veryga (ECR)

    In a report published in 2016[1], the Commission defined arduous work as follows:

    ‘Occupations involving the exposure of the worker over a period of time to one or several factors leading to professional situations susceptible to leave long-lasting and irreversible effects on his/her health; these factors are related to physical constraints, psychosocial risks, an aggressive physical environment, working organisation and working rhythms, including shift work’.

    According to a recent study conducted by the European Federation of Salaried Doctors (FEMS), the working conditions of doctors meet all of these criteria, particularly in the more demanding medical specialisations. Furthermore, the current shortage of doctors has further deteriorated their working conditions, increasing the physical and psychological demands of their profession[2].

    In light of the above:

    • 1.Does the Commission intend to promote an EU initiative to define common criteria for fair remuneration, safe working hours, and the recognition of the physical and psychological risks faced by doctors as arduous or hazardous work?
    • 2.Does the Commission plan to initiate a dialogue with the Member States and social partners with a view to harmonising the implementation of national legislative standards on this issue?

    Submitted: 27.6.2025

    • [1] European Commission: Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion, Applica, Liser, Ose, Spasova, S. et al., Retirement regimes for workers in arduous or hazardous jobs in Europe – A study of national policies 2016, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2016, https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2767/978434.
    • [2] European Federation of Salaried Doctors (FEMS), European Doctors Working Conditions – A FEMS White Book, 2024.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Hearings – Generative AI and Democracy – 17-07-2025 – Special committee on the European Democracy Shield

    Source: European Parliament

    On 17 July, a hearing will be held on Generative AI and Democracy. The rise of generative AI technologies has significantly expanded the capabilities of malicious actors to manipulate public opinion, create disinformation and disrupt democratic processes.

    With the ability of creating highly believable deep fakes and synthetic media, this new technology makes it easier to distort reality and to massively scale up traditional FIMI techniques (foreign information manipulation and interference) into more complex methods of interference, and this in a very easy and cost effective way. By examining this intersection of generative AI, FIMI and political manipulation, the objective of this hearing is to outline a clear understanding of the challenges ahead in this area, and, more importantly, the potential way forward in concrete steps that the EU and the tech community can take to protect democracy from unclear and still evolving digital threats.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Briefing – AI and the energy sector – 04-07-2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Artificial intelligence (AI) is revolutionising many sectors of the economy, including the energy sector. The exponential growth of data centres around the world and in Europe is driving up electricity demand, raising questions about its impact on existing infrastructure and on sustainability. At the same time, AI can help transform energy systems by boosting energy efficiency, facilitating the integration of renewables and optimising electricity networks. According to the International Energy Agency, data centres currently account for only 1.5 % of global electricity consumption, but their electricity demand is expected to more than double by 2030. In the EU, data centres account for around 3 % of total electricity demand, but this varies between countries and is over 20 % in Ireland. AI-focused data centres tend to cluster in geographical locations, contributing to pressure on local grids and involving trade-offs with climate goals, land use and energy affordability. A ChatGPT query uses 10 times more electricity than a traditional Google search, although that depends on the complexity of the question and the format used (text vs. multimedia). A large data centre is estimated to consume as much electricity annually as 100 000 households. Data centres use energy not only to train and run AI models but also to cool servers and maintain equipment. Renewables and natural gas are the main energy sources used to power data centres globally, although nuclear (and, in the future, small modular reactors) is also on the rise. The EU’s 2020 digital strategy called for data centres to become climate neutral by 2030. The 2023 EU Energy Efficiency Directive requires data centres to report on their energy consumption, water usage and use of renewable energy, and a 2024 EU scheme for rating the sustainability of data centres requires them to report on key performance indicators on energy and sustainability. Upcoming EU initiatives aim to balance ambitions on competitiveness and concerns over decarbonisation. The Cloud and AI Development Act, expected in the coming months, will aim to triple EU data centre capacity in the next 5-7 years, while the ‘strategic roadmap for digitalisation and AI for the energy sector’ and the ‘data centre energy efficiency package’, planned for early 2026, will address the energy impacts.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Spain: EIB and Castilla y León regional government sign €74 million loan to finance projects related to agriculture, forestry, and climate change adaptation and mitigation in rural areas

    Source: European Investment Bank

    EIB

    • This is the first tranche of a total approved loan of €245 million to co-finance projects under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development.
    • The financing will enable the Castilla y León regional government to co-finance projects to modernise farms, recover forest land and facilitate climate change mitigation and adaptation in rural areas.
    • The agreement stands out for its contribution to climate action and environmental sustainability, support for agriculture and the bioeconomy, and promotion of cohesion, all of which are EIB Group strategic priorities.

    The European Investment Bank (EIB) has signed a €74 million loan with the government of the Spanish region of Castilla y León (Junta de Castilla y León) to co-finance rural and agricultural and forestry sector investment under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) operational plan for 2023-2027. This is the first tranche of total approved EIB financing of €245 million.

    The EIB loan and Junta de Castilla y León co-financing will provide support for projects to modernise farms across the region, as well as for climate change adaptation and natural resource management. They will also make it easier to access financing for forest land planting and recovery projects and agroforestry land conversions. In addition, the loan will back climate change mitigation and adaptation investment in rural areas and the LEADER local development programme.

    The agreement highlights the commitment of the European Investment Bank Group (EIB Group) to climate action and environmental sustainability, economic, social and territorial cohesion, and support for agriculture and the bioeconomy, three of the eight priorities set out in the Group’s Strategic Roadmap for 2024-2027. All of the operations will take place within the Castilla y León region.

    This co-financing agreement under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development comes in addition to the agreement to support the dual green and digital transition, education and innovation in the region signed by the Junta de Castilla y León and the EIB in June 2024. The 2024 agreement was signed under the 2021-2027 operational plan of the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) and other EU funds.

    Background information

    EIB

    The European Investment Bank (ElB) is the long-term lending institution of the European Union, owned by its Member States. Built around eight core priorities, we finance investments that contribute to EU policy objectives by bolstering climate action and the environment, digitalisation and technological innovation, security and defence, cohesion, agriculture and bioeconomy, social infrastructure, the capital markets union, and a stronger Europe in a more peaceful and prosperous world.

    The EIB Group, which also includes the European Investment Fund (EIF), signed nearly €89 billion in new financing for over 900 high-impact projects in 2024, boosting Europe’s competitiveness and security.

    All projects financed by the EIB Group are in line with the Paris Agreement, as pledged in its Climate Bank Roadmap. Almost 60% of the EIB Group’s annual financing supports projects directly contributing to climate change mitigation, adaptation, and a healthier environment.

    In Spain, the EIB Group signed €12.3 billion of new financing for more than 100 high-impact projects in 2024. This financing is contributing to the country’s green and digital transition, economic growth, competitiveness and improved services for residents.

    High-quality, up-to-date photos of the organisation’s headquarters for media use are available here.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: EIB Global steps up support for Montenegro’s economic development

    Source: European Investment Bank

    EIB

    • EIB has signed a Host Country Agreement with the government of Montenegro  
    • EIB will provide a loan of €18 million loan and a grant of €2.3 million for the Montenegro’s education system  
    • Montenegro will use the loan for nationwide school renovations, while UNOPS will deploy the grant to provide technical assistance

    Today at the European Investment Bank (EIB Global)’s Headquarters in Luxembourg, EIB Vice-President Robert de Groot and Montenegro’s Minister of Finance Novica Vukovic signed a Host Country Agreement between the EIB and Montenegro. This milestone reaffirms EIB Global’s commitment to supporting Montenegro on its path towards convergence with the EU, while paving the way for an EIB Representative to be based in the country for closer collaboration in the future.

    In the presence of Montenegro’s Minister of Education Andjela Jaksic-Stojanovic and UNOPS Assistant Secretary-General and Deputy Executive Director for Delivery and Partnerships Kirstine Damkjaer, EIB Global signed a €20.3 million for the Montenegrin education sector. These funds comprise of an €18 million loan to the Montenegrin government and a grant to the United Nations Office for Project Services (UNOPS) for €2.3 million for technical assistance ensuring that the funds are used a strategically and impactfully.

    The loan will go towards the renovation and digitalisation of pre-primary, primary and secondary schools in Montenegro, as well as to energy-efficiency improvements and the installation of new equipment for vocational training. Provided under the EIB’s Economic Resilience Initiative, the grant will be used by UNOPS to deliver technical support to the Montenegrin Ministry of Education in assessing existing school infrastructure and preparing key investment projects, while ensuring a strategic and impactful deployment of funds

    “The Host Country Agreement signed today formalises the strong EIB support to Montenegro and marks a new chapter in our longstanding cooperation. This, alongside today’s new financing for Montenegro’s education sector, is set to bolster the country’s economic resilience. By creating a cutting-edge learning environment, we will deliver immediate and lasting benefits for students and teachers across Montenegro, while fostering youth employability and economic sustainability in response to evolving market demands.,” EIB Vice-President Robert de Groot said.

    “Today’s signing of the loan agreement to improve education infrastructure, along with a Host Country Agreement establishing the EIB’s presence in Montenegro, strongly reaffirms the strategic partnership and mutual trust we have built over the years. These investments are not just about renovating schools – they are about investing in people, in knowledge, and in Montenegro’s future. The EIB’s physical presence in our country will further strengthen cooperation and ensure more effective implementation of development projects that serve our citizens and accelerate our path toward EU integration.”, said Finance Minister Novica Vuković.

    The new accords bring total EIB Global support for education in Montenegro to €55 million since 2019, including an EU grant for €11 million provided under the Western Balkans Investment Framework. One result of previous financing in this area is the opening of Vladimir Nazor primary school in Podgorica

    “The project entitled “Enhancing the Montenegrin Education System,” implemented by the Ministry of Education, Science and Innovation in cooperation with the Ministry of Finance and the European Investment Bank, is already producing tangible results. We are building new schools, renovating existing facilities, modernizing vocational schools, and investing in advanced equipment and infrastructure. This represents the most comprehensive investment in education infrastructure in the history of our country. My special thanks go to the EIB and UNOPS for their continued trust, support, and commitment to our shared vision for the future of education in Montenegro,” said Education Minister Andjela Jakšić-Stojanović.

    UNOPS has years of experience working with the Montenegrin government to advance a range of areas including education.        

    “This agreement marks a milestone in UNOPS’ partnership with the EIB and the Government of Montenegro. UNOPS is proud to play a role in driving a transformative shift in Montenegro’s education system to ensure that appropriate infrastructure addresses the needs of people and becomes the enabler of key reforms in the country,” said Kirstine Damkjaer, UNOPS Deputy Executive Director for Delivery and Partnerships Kirstine Damkjaer.

    “With this new investment, the European Union is helping Montenegro improve everyday conditions of pupils and teachers across the country. Renovated classrooms, energy-efficient buildings, and modern equipment are not only vital for quality education — they also support long-term economic development and social cohesion. This is a strategic investment in Montenegro’s future, and a clear sign of our continued partnership on the path to EU membership.”, said EU Ambassador to Montenegro Johan Sattler.

    Background information

    About the EIB and EIB Global

    The EIB is the long-term financing institution of the European Union, owned by its Member States. It makes long-term finance available for sound investment in order to contribute towards EU policy goals. The EIB supports projects in four priority areas: infrastructure, innovation, climate and environment, and small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). EIB Global is the EIB Group’s specialised arm devoted to increasing the impact of international partnerships and development finance, and a key partner of Global Gateway. It aims to support €100 billion of investment by the end of 2027 – around one-third of the overall target of this EU initiative. Within Team Europe, EIB Global fosters strong, focused partnerships alongside fellow development finance institutions and civil society. EIB Global brings the EIB Group closer to local people, companies and institutions through its offices around the world.

    About the EIB in Montenegro

    The EU bank has been an active partner of Montenegro, providing almost €1.1 billion in loans to the country, mostly in support of SMEs, education and transport infrastructure. For more information on EIB projects in Montenegro, visit https://www.eib.org/en/projects/regions/enlargement/the-western-balkans/montenegro/index.htm. 

    About the Economic Resilience Initiative (ERI)

    The Economic Resilience Initiative, which backs the grant awareded, was established by the EIB in 2016 to channel donors’ resources to impactful projects in the Southern Neighbourhood and Western Balkans to help meet the challenges posed by forced displacement and migration. ERI has measurable economic, social and environmental outcomes that contribute to sustainable development goals relating to clean water and sanitation, affordable and clean energy, decent work and economic growth, industry, innovation and infrastructure, and sustainable cities and communities.

    About UNOPS

    UNOPS offers practical solutions across peace and security, humanitarian and development operations. We help the United Nations, governments and other partners, such as the European Union, its Member States and financial institutions like the European Investment Bank, to manage projects, and deliver sustainable infrastructure and procurement across the world.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on underinvestment in endometriosis research – B10-0309/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    pursuant to Rule 149 of the Rules of Procedure

    Tomasz Froelich, Gerolf Annemans, Anja Arndt, Paolo Borchia, Zsuzsanna Borvendég, Irmhild Boßdorf, Stine Bosse, Markus Buchheit, Virginie Joron, Alexander Jungbluth, Jacek Ozdoba, Friedrich Pürner, Katarína Roth Neveďalová, Alexander Sell, Isabella Tovaglieri

    B10‑0309/2025

    Motion for a European Parliament resolution on underinvestment in endometriosis research

    The European Parliament,

     having regard to Rule 149 of its Rules of Procedure,

    A. whereas endometriosis is associated with a range of often debilitating symptoms;

    B. whereas endometriosis carries the risk of infertility and therefore has a negative impact on demography;

    C. whereas endometriosis affects around 14 million women in Europe;

    D. whereas endometriosis has a substantial economic impact, with direct healthcare costs, indirect costs related to lost productivity at work, and the financial burden of infertility treatments;

    E. whereas the cost of endometriosis-related sick leave in the EU is estimated at EUR 30 billion annually;

    F. whereas at EU level only 27 out of a total of 145 983 projects funded (0.02 %) were related to endometriosis[1];

    1. Is of the opinion that funding dedicated to endometriosis at EU level is completely inadequate and not in proportion to the considerable health and social burden attributable to this disorder;

    2. Calls on the Commission to give a much higher priority to endometriosis in health funding in order to promote women’s health and fertility;

    3. Encourages the Member States to raise awareness of endometriosis and to invest in innovative research initiatives.

    • [1] Vigano, P. et al., ‘European Union underinvestment in endometriosis research’, Journal of Endometriosis and Uterine Disorders, Vol. 5, March 2024.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Enforcement of the Digital Markets Act in the context of EU-US trade negotiations – P-002647/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Priority question for written answer  P-002647/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Stéphanie Yon-Courtin (Renew), Alexandra Geese (Verts/ALE), Pierre Jouvet (S&D), Nathalie Loiseau (Renew), Laura Ballarín Cereza (S&D), Anna Cavazzini (Verts/ALE), Petras Auštrevičius (Renew), Kim Van Sparrentak (Verts/ALE), Robert Biedroń (S&D), Elisabeth Grossmann (S&D), Helmut Brandstätter (Renew), Bart Groothuis (Renew), Rasmus Andresen (Verts/ALE), Laurence Farreng (Renew), Irena Joveva (Renew), Marie-Pierre Vedrenne (Renew), Valérie Devaux (Renew), Veronika Cifrová Ostrihoňová (Renew), Ľubica Karvašová (Renew), Jean-Marc Germain (S&D), Lena Schilling (Verts/ALE), Christophe Grudler (Renew), Pascal Canfin (Renew), Katarina Barley (S&D), Fabienne Keller (Renew)

    The Digital Markets Act (DMA) became fully applicable in March 2024 and constitutes a cornerstone of the EU’s digital regulatory framework, ensuring fair competition and contestability in digital markets.

    However, recent media reports[1] suggest that the EU and the United States are discussing exempting US companies from DMA enforcement in their negotiations on tariffs and a reciprocal trade agreement. While Commission President von der Leyen stated that ‘the sovereignty of our decision-making process is untouchable’, the Commission’s spokesperson has not clearly ruled out temporary enforcement concessions. Senior officials from the Commission’s Directorate-General for Trade and Economic Security have suggested that, while ‘regulatory autonomy’ remains a red line, flexibility in application could still be explored.

    Such a move raises serious concerns about the integrity of the EU’s regulatory framework and the equal treatment of companies subject to the DMA. It would set a dangerous precedent for external interference in EU legislation.

    • 1.Can the Commission clearly, unequivocally and publicly confirm that it will neither delay nor suspend the enforcement of the DMA for US companies and will not use it as a trade instrument?
    • 2.How will the Commission ensure the uniform and timely application of the DMA, regardless of trade talks?
    • 3.How will Parliament be kept fully informed, directly by the Commission, of any such discussions with non-EU countries, rather than learning about them through the media?

    Submitted: 30.6.2025

    • [1] https://www.wsj.com/economy/trade/u-s-eu-near-deal-on-non-tariff-trade-irritants-455c42f1.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Application of the Digital Markets Act – reports about a common committee with tech companies – P-002678/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Priority question for written answer  P-002678/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Matthias Ecke (S&D)

    German newspaper Handelsblatt last week reported on a potential ‘deal’ between negotiators from the US and the Commission in order to prevent an escalation of the trade conflict, citing EU negotiating circles. US tech companies are to be given a say in the application of the Digital Markets Act (DMA) in future, in the form of a common committee.

    Such a step would significantly undermine the regulation of tech companies. In times where US tech giants are introducing new features (for example, Google’s AI summaries at the top of its search results), Europe must enforce its existing legislation to protect competition, innovation and consumer choice, instead of inviting the target of the regulatory measure to (re-)shape it.

    With regard to our aim of digital sovereignty, I would like to ask the Commission:

    • 1.Can you explain the state of play regarding these negotiations?
    • 2.Can you guarantee that DMA enforcement will be exclusively based on the procedures laid down in the regulation, without the forming of any body which includes (and gives a say to) the regulated entities?
    • 3.Is the Commission assessing Google’s use of AI summaries at the top of its search results under the DMA?

    Submitted: 1.7.2025

    Last updated: 4 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Law enshrining as the anthem of Styria, Austria, a controversial song containing territorial claims on Slovenia – P-002710/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Priority question for written answer  P-002710/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Matjaž Nemec (S&D)

    The provincial parliament of the Austrian province of Styria has adopted a proposal by the ruling Freedom Party (FPÖ), a member of the Patriots Group, and the People’s Party (ÖVP), a member of the EPP Group, to include the controversial Dachsteinlied in the law on provincial symbols.

    The song is controversial for Slovenia because the lyrics, which date from the 19th century, refer to the land of Austrian Styria extending ‘to the banks of the Sava and the Drava’, in other words to encompass present-day Slovenian territory.

    By adopting this measure, the provincial government and parliament have taken a step in the direction of nationalist rhetoric, historical revisionism and politically motivated provocation, contrary to the fundamental principles and values of the European Union, including the principle of sincere cooperation between Member States, mutual respect for sovereignty and territorial integrity, and commitment to the peaceful settlement of disputes.

    Laws that can be understood as an expression of territorial claims or encroachment on the territorial integrity of another Member State have no place in the EU.

    • 1.Is the Commission aware of the adoption of this law and of its content?
    • 2.Is the law compatible with the values and legal order of the EU, in particular the principles of sincere cooperation and respect for the sovereignty and territorial integrity of the Member States?
    • 3.What steps does the Commission intend to take to ensure that Austria respects its obligations under the Treaties, and is the Commission considering initiating infringement proceedings before the Court of Justice of the EU?

    Submitted: 2.7.2025

    Last updated: 4 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Radioactive waste – E-002604/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002604/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Nicolás González Casares (S&D)

    In recent days we have learned that an expedition led by the French National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS) will analyse the condition of the thousands of barrels of radioactive waste dumped in the Atlantic trench and their potential impact on the environment.

    • 1.Does the Commission not believe that this type of expedition should be led by the Commission itself, given the location of the waste and the cross-border nature of their potential impact?
    • 2.Over the past few years, it has repeatedly refused to investigate directly the situation in the trench, despite acknowledging as far back as 2017 that it was not aware of the condition of the waste. Will it participate in the French expedition or follow up on its findings?
    • 3.Under Article 35 of the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, Member States must carry out continuous monitoring of the level of radioactivity in the air, water and soil. Will the Commission thus include monitoring of marine radioactivity off the coast of Galicia in its Article 35 verifications programme?

    Submitted: 27.6.2025

    Last updated: 4 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Radioactive waste in the Atlantic trench – E-002601/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002601/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Francisco José Millán Mon (PPE), Adrián Vázquez Lázara (PPE)

    Last week the French oceanographic vessel L’Atalante entered one of the nuclear waste discharge areas in international waters of the Atlantic Ocean, to the north-west of Galicia. The aim of this scientific expedition is to locate and map the barrels dumped there by a number of European countries in the second half of the last century, and to analyse the waste’s impact on the Atlantic’s abyssal plains.

    Protecting the oceans, promoting a prosperous and resilient blue economy, and fostering the well-being of coastal communities are priority objectives for the international community, and the European Union in particular, as reflected in the European Ocean Pact. In view of this:

    • 1.Is the Commission aware of this initiative?
    • 2.Is it in contact with the French authorities to monitor this activity and keep track of the expedition’s progress?
    • 3.Does it know if any of the waste could have caused a significant increase in radioactivity levels that could affect European waters?

    Submitted: 27.6.2025

    Last updated: 4 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Briefing – Estonia’s National Recovery and Resilience Plan: Latest state of play – 04-07-2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Estonia’s National Recovery and Resilience Plan (NRRP) – one of the last NRRPs submitted to the European Commission – sets out the reforms and public investment projects Estonia intends to implement with the support of the Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF). The RRF is one of the main components of Next Generation EU, an EU instrument to counter the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Estonia’s plan is one of the smallest in the EU in terms of the total amount allocated. However, when taking into account its number of inhabitants, the country is a medium-sized beneficiary. Initially, Estonia requested €982.5 million in grants but in the modified version, submitted to the European Commission in March 2023, Estonia reduced this amount to €953.3 million (-1.7 % compared with the original plan). The modified plan takes into account the updated maximum financial contribution published on 30 June 2022 (€863.5 million, down from €969.3 million) which reflects changes in real gross domestic product (GDP) over time. Furthermore, it includes a REPowerEU chapter to reinforce the plan’s energy dimension. Estonia’s modified plan represents 0.1 % of the entire RRF, equal to 3.4 % of the country’s GDP in 2019 (the RRF being 5.2 % of EU-27 GDP in 2019). Estonia did not request any RRF loans. The Council approved Estonia’s initial plan on 25 October 2021 and the modified plan on 16 June 2023. The European Commission disbursed €126 million (13.2 % of the resources of the revised plan) in pre-financing on 17 December 2021, the first payment of €239 million on 6 November 2023, REPowerEU chapter pre-financing of 18 million on 14 December 2023, the second payment of €122 million on 18 April 2024, and the third payment of €122 million on 18 March 2025. In total, Estonia has so far received €627 million (65.8 % of the resources). The European Parliament, which was a great supporter of the creation of a common EU recovery instrument, participates in interinstitutional cooperation and discussions on its implementation, and scrutinises the European Commission’s work. This briefing is one in a series covering all EU Member States. Third edition. The ‘Monitoring EU recovery’ briefings are updated at key stages throughout the lifecycle of the plans.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Remarks by President António Costa at the joint press conference following the EU-Moldova summit in Chișinău

    Source: Council of the European Union

    The first EU-Moldova summit was held on 4 July 2025 in Chișinău. At the joint press conference, European Council President António Costa reaffirmed that Moldova’s future is within the EU. He commended Moldova’s reform progress and resilience in the face of multiple crises, underlining the EU’s determination to support the country’s accession process, economic development and security.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI: Countdown to Launch: Lightchain AI Begins Final Presale Phase

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    SHREWSBURY, United Kingdom, July 04, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Lightchain AI, a next-generation blockchain infrastructure platform designed for decentralized artificial intelligence, has announced the start of its Final Bonus Round, following the successful close of its structured presale which raised $21.1 million.

    This final round offers LCAI tokens at a fixed price of $0.007125, providing early supporters and new contributors a last opportunity to participate before the upcoming mainnet launch in July 2025. The structured presale, which included 15 stages and attracted a wide base of early supporters, has helped Lightchain AI build strong traction heading into its network deployment phase.

    Milestone Reflects Growing Confidence in On-Chain AI Infrastructure

    Lightchain AI’s architecture is centered around its proprietary Artificial Intelligence Virtual Machine (AIVM) and Proof-of-Intelligence (PoI) consensus. These technologies allow AI workloads to be executed directly on-chain while maintaining decentralization, transparency, and efficiency. The platform’s consensus mechanism rewards validators for completing meaningful AI computational tasks—transforming network security into a driver for decentralized intelligence.

    The funds raised have been strategically allocated to validator onboarding, ecosystem tools, infrastructure expansion, and grant programs. The team also removed the previously reserved 5% Team Allocation, redirecting it toward builder incentives and network growth to maintain decentralization and transparency.

    Developer Ecosystem and Validator Activity Expanding

    The Lightchain Developer Portal is now live, providing access to SDKs, APIs, and documentation for developers building AI-integrated dApps. A $150,000 grant program is underway to support early builders and technical contributors. The platform’s staking mechanism is fully deployed, enabling validators to simulate reward mechanisms as they prepare for the full network rollout.

    Additionally, Lightchain AI has begun opening access to its public GitHub repositories, ensuring that development efforts remain open and verifiable by the community.

    Final Phase Opens Ahead of Mainnet

    Lightchain AI’s Bonus Round comes with fixed pricing and access to ecosystem incentives and governance tools. It also provides contributors early entry into validator opportunities and token-based rewards structures designed to support long-term network alignment.

    “Crossing $21 million raised is an important validation of our technology and community-first approach,” said a Lightchain AI spokesperson. “This final round is about more than tokens—it’s about expanding our ecosystem and empowering builders as we head toward mainnet.”

    Key Launch Milestones Ahead

    • Mainnet Launch – July 2025
    • Developer Grant Applications – Opening Q3 2025
    • Validator Participation – Ongoing
    • Public GitHub Access – Rolling release through Q3

    To Learn More or Join the Final Bonus Round

    Website: https://lightchain.ai
    Whitepaper: https://lightchain.ai/lightchain-whitepaper.pdf
    Twitter/X: https://x.com/LightchainAI
    Telegram: https://t.me/LightchainProtocol

    Contact:
    SHAJAN SKARIA
    media@lightchain.ai

    Disclaimer: This content is provided by Lightchain AI. The statements, views, and opinions expressed in this content are solely those of the content provider and do not necessarily reflect the views of this media platform or its publisher. We do not endorse, verify, or guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of any information presented. We do not guarantee any claims, statements, or promises made in this article. This content is for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial, investment, or trading advice.Investing in crypto and mining-related opportunities involves significant risks, including the potential loss of capital. It is possible to lose all your capital. These products may not be suitable for everyone, and you should ensure that you understand the risks involved. Seek independent advice if necessary. Speculate only with funds that you can afford to lose. Readers are strongly encouraged to conduct their own research and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. However, due to the inherently speculative nature of the blockchain sector—including cryptocurrency, NFTs, and mining—complete accuracy cannot always be guaranteed.Neither the media platform nor the publisher shall be held responsible for any fraudulent activities, misrepresentations, or financial losses arising from the content of this press release. In the event of any legal claims or charges against this article, we accept no liability or responsibility.Globenewswire does not endorse any content on this page.

    Legal Disclaimer: This media platform provides the content of this article on an “as-is” basis, without any warranties or representations of any kind, express or implied. We assume no responsibility for any inaccuracies, errors, or omissions. We do not assume any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information presented herein. Any concerns, complaints, or copyright issues related to this article should be directed to the content provider mentioned above.

    A photo accompanying this announcement is available at https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/40b1489e-d08b-48b0-8cc4-a1701e0401e6

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI Africa: Mauritius: South West Indian Ocean Fisheries Commission (SWIOFC) Member States strengthened regional cooperation for sustainable Tuna fisheries management

    Source: APO – Report:

    The Working Party on Collaboration and Cooperation in Tuna Fisheries (WPCCTF) from the South West Indian Ocean Fisheries Commission (SWIOFC), met in Mauritius to continue its work on strengthening regional cooperation for the effective management of tuna fisheries and other highly migratory fish in the region.

    The 13th Session of the WPCCTF brought together during two days (17-18 June 2025) 11 from the 12 SWIOFC countries – Comoros, France, Kenya, Madagascar, Maldives, Mauritius, Mozambique, Seychelles, Somalia, South Africa and Tanzania. Partner organizations, namely the World Bank, the Indian Ocean Commission (IOC), the World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF), the Nairobi Convention – UNEP, the Southern African Development Community (SADC), and the South West Indian Ocean Tuna Forum (SWIOTUNA) attended the meeting as SWIOFC Observers. Other Regional Fishery Bodies – the Southern Indian Ocean Fisheries Agreement (SIOFA) and the Indian Ocean Tuna Commission (IOTC)- actively participated in the discussion with members, specifically regarding SWIOFC compliance and reporting requirements.

    Patrice Talla, FAO Subregional Coordinator for Southern Africa, welcomed the participants and emphasized the importance of the WPCCTF as a platform for dialogue and collective action, underscoring the need for coastal states to manage tuna stocks responsibly within their Exclusive Economic Zones (EEZs) and to collaborate regionally to rebuild overexploited stocks, particularly yellowfin tuna. Talla stressed the importance of strengthening national capacities to comply with Conservation and Management Measures (CMMs) and to implement effective Monitoring, Control and Surveillance (MCS) systems.

    Mbuli Charles Boliko, FAO Representative in Madagascar, Comoros, Mauritius and Seychelles, highlighted the significance of the Indian Ocean as the second-largest tuna-producing region globally, playing a vital role in supporting national economies and livelihoods. Boliko stressed that challenges such as Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated (IUU) fishing, climate-induced migratory shifts, and external competition require a unified regional response grounded in science, cooperation, and shared commitment.

    The Working Party members acknowledged the progress made in the region, including the adoption and progressive implementation of the SWIOFC-led instrument, the MTC Guidelines, and the regional effort for jointly regulating and managing foreign fishing access for the best interest of the region. The MTC Guidelines (the Guidelines for Minimum Terms and Conditions for foreign fishing access) were officially adopted by all SWIOFC member countries in February 2019. WWF, a long-standing partner of the WPCCTF, presented recent work conducted on this subject, which was led by the Minimum Terms and Conditions Task Force (MTCTF) of the SWIOFC. This work received technical support from NFDS and focused on the joint and concerted actions required for the implementation of the priority provisions of the SWIOFC instrument, such as the provisions regulating licensing requirements, the use of Vessel Monitoring Systems (VMS), transshipments and compensations and access fees.

    Other subject thoroughly discussed was the cooperation between SWIOFC, SADC and IOC on regional Monitoring, Control and Surveillance (MCS) initiatives. The new workplan for 2025–2026 was adopted, and the WP formulated joint recommendations for the upcoming plenary session of the SWIOFC, scheduled to take place in November 2025.

    The event was supported by the SWIOFish5 TRANSFORM project, funded by the World Bank and implemented by IOC with technical assistance from FAO. The project, ending in 2030, has the objective of strengthening regional, evidence-based fisheries management in the region.

    – on behalf of Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO): Regional Office for Africa.

    Media files

    .

    MIL OSI Africa

  • MIL-OSI Africa: Guaranty Trust Holding Company Plc (GTCO Plc) Becomes the 1st Financial Services Institution in West Africa to Achieve Listing and Trading of its Ordinary Shares on the London Stock Exchange

    Source: APO – Report:

    Guaranty Trust Holding Company Plc (GTCO Plc) (www.GTCOPlc.com), Africa’s leading and most profitable Financial Services Group, has recorded a significant milestone in its growth and expansion journey with the successful admission of its Ordinary Shares to the Equity Shares (International Commercial Companies Secondary Listing) category of the Official List of the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and to trading on the main market for listed securities of the London Stock Exchange.

    This historic achievement makes GTCO Plc, the 1st Financial Services Institution in West Africa to dual list its Ordinary Shares on both the Nigerian and London stock exchanges, and subject to certain criteria, it is expected that the Shares will be transferrable between the two exchanges.

    The admission follows the successful pricing of its fully marketed offering (The Offering) on the London Stock Exchange to raise gross proceeds of $105million in exchange for 2.29 billion of new ordinary shares in the company, which was supported by a strong book of high-quality, long-term institutional investors.

    Concurrent with the Offering, the Company also gave notice of its intention to cancel the listing of its existing GDRs on the certificates representing certain securities (depositary receipts) category of the Official List of the United Kingdom Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”) and the admission to trading of GDRs on the London Stock Exchange’s main market for listed securities.

    Building on the momentum of the successful first tranche of its equity capital raise programme in July 2024, which secured ₦209 billion, GTCO will deploy the proceeds from the Offering to strengthen its capital base, meet its recapitalization target, and fund strategic expansion across high-growth markets and priority sectors within and outside Nigeria.

    It is expected that Admission and unconditional dealing in the Shares will become effective on or before 8.00 a.m. (UK time) on 9 July 2025 under the ticker “GTHC”. Following the cancellation of the GDRs listing, the Company intends to change the ticker symbol for the Shares from “GTHC” to “GTCO” and will issue a separate announcement in due course to that effect.

    Commenting on the LSE Listing, the Group Chief Executive Officer of Guaranty Trust Holding Company Plc, Mr. Segun Agbaje, said: “Today marks a major milestone—not just for GTCO, but for the future we see for African financial institutions on the global stage. We are incredibly proud to be the 1st Financial Services Institution in West Africa to list our ordinary shares on London Stock Exchange’s main market for listed securities, and even more honored by the trust placed in us by the investing community. For us, this was not just about raising capital. It was about validating the strength of our franchise, the clarity of our strategy, and the discipline with which we execute.”

    He further said; “I would like to thank everyone who made this possible—our advisors and legal teams, our longstanding shareholders, the regulators both in Nigeria and in the UK, as well as the Nigerian government for creating an environment that supports our bold ambition and vision to be Africa’s leading financial services institution.”

    GTCO’s fully marketed offering attracted long-term institutional capital, reflecting investor confidence in the Group’s fundamentals, governance, and strategic outlook. It also signals improving market sentiment, buoyed by ongoing economic reforms by the Federal Government and a return to traditional orthodox monetary policy by the Central Bank of Nigeria, which have gone a long way to stabilising the macroeconomic environment and gradually restoring investor confidence in Nigeria’s long-term prospects.

    – on behalf of Guaranty Trust Holding Company Plc.

    About GTCO Plc:
    GTCO Plc is one of Africa’s leading financial services institutions with a longstanding track record of strong growth, service excellence, and shareholder returns. The Group operates across banking, payments, asset management, and pension administration in eleven countries, including Nigeria, the UK, and key African markets.

    Media files

    .

    MIL OSI Africa

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Briefing – Military mobility – 04-07-2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has drawn renewed attention to military mobility, highlighting the need for rapid cross-border movement of troops and equipment to strengthen deterrence and defence. Challenges such as outdated bridges, tunnels and railways, along with inconsistent regulations across EU Member States, impede swift military movements. Building on the first EU action plan on military mobility launched in 2018, the action plan on military mobility 2.0, adopted in November 2022, expands infrastructure upgrades, regulatory harmonisation and operational readiness. Two joint annual reports from the European Parliament and the Council show progress in implementing the action plans: €1.76 billion have funded 95 projects in 21 Member States, including €807 million in the latest round. The revised Regulation on the trans-European transport network (TEN-T) now legally recognises military mobility, and four strategic corridors have been identified in coordination with the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and the European External Action Service. Operational readiness has also improved through streamlined customs and transport procedures, enhanced fuel supply chains, and joint exercises, while partnerships with NATO and third countries have deepened. The March 2025 White Paper for European Defence – Readiness 2030 underscores military mobility as a critical enabler for EU security, identifying urgent investments, harmonised design standards, and regulatory reforms to remove persistent barriers and strengthen resilience of dual-use (civilian and military) infrastructure. However, the European Court of Auditors warns that funding remains insufficient, strategic focus is lacking, and project selection overlooks geopolitical priorities, while bureaucratic barriers remain. Persistent challenges include underfunding, fragmented procedures, limited strategic coherence, and the need for greater coordination with NATO. The European Parliament supports an integrated approach with harmonised regulations, increased dual-use investments, swift project implementation, greater partner participation under the permanent structured cooperation (PESCO), and a deepened partnership with NATO. At the same time, Parliament stresses the need for Europe to take greater responsibility for its own security.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: EU and Moldova forge deeper ties at historic first Summit in Chișinău

    Source: European Commission

    European Commission Press release Brussels, 04 Jul 2025 At the first ever EU-Moldova Summit in Chișinău, President of the European Commission Ursula von der Leyen, President of the European Council António Costa and President of the Republic of Moldova Maia Sandu agreed to deepen cooperation in the interest of EU and Moldovan citizens.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Reported environmental and human rights abuses of EU steel companies in non-EU countries and the need to uphold the CSDDD’s objective – E-002596/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002596/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Majdouline Sbai (Verts/ALE), Marie Toussaint (Verts/ALE), Elisabeth Grossmann (S&D), Virginijus Sinkevičius (Verts/ALE), Marina Mesure (The Left), Catarina Vieira (Verts/ALE), Benedetta Scuderi (Verts/ALE), Maria Ohisalo (Verts/ALE), Nora Mebarek (S&D), David Cormand (Verts/ALE), Mélissa Camara (Verts/ALE), Mounir Satouri (Verts/ALE), Tilly Metz (Verts/ALE), Saskia Bricmont (Verts/ALE), Thomas Waitz (Verts/ALE), Estelle Ceulemans (S&D), Per Clausen (The Left), Manon Aubry (The Left), Sara Matthieu (Verts/ALE), Anja Hazekamp (The Left), Cristina Guarda (Verts/ALE), Anthony Smith (The Left), Lena Schilling (Verts/ALE), Ana Miranda Paz (Verts/ALE), Michael Bloss (Verts/ALE), Hanna Gedin (The Left), Jean-Marc Germain (S&D)

    As stated by the Commission, ‘certain EU companies have [had] adverse human rights and environmental impacts … in their value chains [including] forced labour, exploitation of workers, pollution … or biodiversity loss’. Many of these abuses have been widely documented by NGOs, in the case of ArcelorMittal and Ternium activities in non-EU countries. They are complemented by threats, disappearances – such as that of Antonio Díaz Valencia – and killings of community defenders and environmental activists, land grabbing and negative health impacts. As a recent study suggests, the steel plant in Rio de Janeiro has led to over one thousand deaths.

    In the light of both this and the recent Commission proposal for an omnibus on the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD), how does the Commission intend to:

    • 1.uphold the application of Article 2 TEU and Article 191 TFEU, as their objectives require the involvement not only of public authorities, but also of companies?
    • 2.prevent fragmentation and provide legal certainty for businesses operating in the internal market?
    • 3.uphold the key provisions of the CSDDD to avoid ending up with an empty shell, and thus to remain consistent with its own declaration that the EU can ‘no longer turn a blind eye to what happens down our value chains’?

    Submitted: 26.6.2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – EU rules are curbing people’s freedoms and crushing their dreams – E-002594/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002594/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Charlie Weimers (ECR), Beatrice Timgren (ECR), Dick Erixon (ECR)

    In an open letter, Camilla describes how the EU requirements regarding daily rest periods are clashing with a Swedish law (‘the LSS’) designed to ensure that people with disabilities are offered support and services.[1]

    The aim of the LSS is to make sure that people with disabilities can live as dignified and independent a life as possible. Camilla lives in accommodation provided under the LSS and, as a result, the EU rules are having a negative impact on her. If she needs to travel, she can’t get an assistant to accompany her, especially if an overnight stay is required.

    The Commission’s reinterpretation of the EU rules is having an adverse impact on many Swedes. Camilla describes how the EU has taken away her freedom to go on longer trips, and in her new circumstances she feels like she’s ‘in a cage’. It’s become more difficult to do what she’s always dreamt of doing. Camilla says that the world that people with disabilities live in getting smaller and smaller, and because of the EU, they are becoming even more isolated and faring worse.

    The staff at Camilla’s accommodation and other people working as LSS assistants share her concerns. Camilla says they think the EU rules are hampering their flexibility and their ability to brighten up people’s daily lives.

    Camilla ends her letter by expressing her wish for the rules to be changed to bring more flexibility and to make it possible to meet people’s needs under the LSS system.

    • 1.Is the Commission aware of the ways in which EU rules are affecting the quality of life of people with disabilities?
    • 2.Does the Commission take the view that the current rules are in line with the EU’s Charter of Fundamental Rights, which states that people with disabilities have a right to live independently, to have a job and to be part of the community?
    • 3.Is the Commission going to review the rules with a view to addressing the problems with 24-hour shift work?

    Submitted: 26.6.2025

    • [1] https://www.na.se/2025-06-20/oppet-brev-till-eu-ledamoterna-och-politiker-om-dygnsvila
    Last updated: 4 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Methodical killing of stray animals in Romania and potential misuse of EU funds – E-002593/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002593/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Sebastian Everding (The Left), Anja Hazekamp (The Left), Manuela Ripa (PPE), Sirpa Pietikäinen (PPE), Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă (NI), Emil Radev (PPE), Friedrich Pürner (NI), Tilly Metz (Verts/ALE), Merja Kyllönen (The Left), Emma Fourreau (The Left), Tomáš Kubín (PfE)

    There is a well-founded suspicion that EU funding is being severely misused in Romania, where stray dogs are being killed systematically by privately run organisations financed by the Romanian government. The resources used for these operations are EU funds received to protect animals.

    In several counties, local authorities regularly conclude contracts with private organisations whose business model is based on the methodical killing of stray animals. In 2024 alone, 3 871 dogs were captured, of which 3 286 were killed. These operations generated revenues in excess of RON 2.7 million.

    • 1.Does the Commission plan to undertake an immediate, independent investigation into the use of EU funds in connection with the killing of stray animals in Romania?
    • 2.Since animal welfare is expressly enshrined in Article 13 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, is the Commission prepared to make sure that no form of applicable EU funding is used for the killing of stray animals, but can only be used for the humane management of stray animals, such as castration/sterilisation programmes, public education campaigns and the funding of non-profit shelters?
    • 3.Could the Commission specifically confirm that EU funding has not been used for the killing of stray animals under the pretext of the Animal Health Law delegated act on the eradication of infectious diseases[1]?

    Submitted: 26.6.2025

    • [1] Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687 of 17 December 2019 supplementing Regulation (EU) 2016/429 of the European Parliament and the Council, as regards rules for the prevention and control of certain listed diseases (OJ L 174, 3.6.2020, p. 64, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2020/687/oj).
    Last updated: 4 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the human cost of Russia’s war against Ukraine and the urgent need to end Russian aggression: the situation of illegally detained civilians and prisoners of war, and the continued bombing of civilians – RC-B10-0304/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Michael Gahler, Andrzej Halicki, Sebastião Bugalho, David McAllister, Siegfried Mureşan, Isabel Wiseler‑Lima, Nicolás Pascual de la Parte, Mika Aaltola, Wouter Beke, Krzysztof Brejza, Lena Düpont, Jan Farský, Mircea‑Gheorghe Hava, Rasa Juknevičienė, Sandra Kalniete, Ewa Kopacz, Andrey Kovatchev, Reinhold Lopatka, Antonio López‑Istúriz White, Liudas Mažylis, Danuše Nerudová, Mirosława Nykiel, Ana Miguel Pedro, Paulius Saudargas, Oliver Schenk, Michał Szczerba, Davor Ivo Stier, Alice Teodorescu Måwe, Ingeborg Ter Laak, Riho Terras, Matej Tonin, Pekka Toveri, Inese Vaidere
    on behalf of the PPE Group
    Yannis Maniatis, Nacho Sánchez Amor, Thijs Reuten
    on behalf of the S&D Group
    Adam Bielan, Michał Dworczyk, Małgorzata Gosiewska, Sebastian Tynkkynen, Roberts Zīle, Reinis Pozņaks, Ivaylo Valchev, Aurelijus Veryga, Mariusz Kamiński, Charlie Weimers, Alexandr Vondra, Assita Kanko, Joachim Stanisław Brudziński
    on behalf of the ECR Group
    Petras Auštrevičius, Malik Azmani, Dan Barna, Anna‑Maja Henriksson, Ľubica Karvašová, Ilhan Kyuchyuk, Nathalie Loiseau, Urmas Paet, Marie‑Agnes Strack‑Zimmermann, Eugen Tomac, Hilde Vautmans, Lucia Yar, Dainius Žalimas
    on behalf of the Renew Group
    Sergey Lagodinsky
    on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

    European Parliament resolution on the human cost of Russia’s war against Ukraine and the urgent need to end Russian aggression: the situation of illegally detained civilians and prisoners of war, and the continued bombing of civilians

    (2025/2710(RSP))

    The European Parliament,

     having regard to its previous resolutions on Ukraine and on Russia,

     having regard to the Hague Conventions, the UN Charter, the Geneva Conventions and their additional protocols, the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, the European Convention on Human Rights, the UN Convention Against Torture, the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC) and the UN Convention on the rights of the child,

     having regard to the Association Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and Ukraine, of the other part[1], and to the accompanying Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area between the European Union and Ukraine, signed in 2014,

     having regard to all relevant resolutions by the UN General Assembly and Security Council, in particular UN General Assembly Resolution ES-11/7 adopted on 25 February 2025,

     having regard to the NATO Washington Summit Declaration of 10 July 2024 and the Hague Summit Declaration of 25 June 2025,

     having regard to Rule 136(2) of its Rules of Procedure,

    A. whereas Russia has been waging a brutal, illegal, unprovoked and unjustified full-scale war of aggression against Ukraine since 24 February 2022;

    B. whereas Russia’s aggression against Ukraine did not begin in February 2022, but in 2014, with the illegal occupation and annexation of Crimea and parts of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions, with severe humanitarian, economic and ecological consequences and resulting in regional instability; whereas Russia could stop the brutal and unjustified war of aggression at any time;

    C. whereas the UN General Assembly, in its resolution of 2 March 2022, immediately qualified the Russian war against Ukraine as an act of aggression in violation of Article 2(4) of the UN Charter, and, in its resolution of 14 November 2022, recognised the need to hold Russia accountable for its war of aggression and legally and financially responsible for its internationally wrongful acts, including by making reparation for the injuries and damage caused;

    D. whereas thus far in 2025, Russia has deployed over 20 000 drones against Ukraine, or around 3 500 per month, representing a 350 % increase compared to the 2024 monthly average; whereas Russia has killed over 1 050 civilians and injured 4 300 more, constituting clear evidence that it actively targets civilians, including ambulances and rescue personnel, in contrast to Ukraine’s defensive actions; whereas the recent attacks on Kyiv and Dnipro were the second deadliest and the deadliest attacks on these cities since the start of Russia’s invasion, starkly conflicting with Russia’s claims that it is interested in peace;

    E. whereas, as a reaction to Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine, the EU has adopted 17 sanctions packages of unprecedented scope against Russia and continues to adopt sanctions against Russia with a view to definitively undermining its capacity to continue waging its illegal war of aggression against Ukraine; whereas the circumvention of sanctions, including through Russia’s shadow fleet and the incomplete implementation of sanctions, remain a major enabler of Russia’s war of aggression; whereas despite these and other sanctions, Russia continues to wage its war of aggression against Ukraine;

    F. whereas the US has again halted supplies of crucial military assistance to Ukraine;

    G. whereas Russia’s aggression against Ukraine has caused the largest forced displacement of civilians in Europe since the Second World War, with 10 million Ukrainians – mostly women and children – displaced, including 7 million who have found refuge abroad[2];

    H. whereas Russia continues unabated to commit heinous war crimes against innocent civilians; whereas according to the Ukrainian authorities, approximately 16 000 Ukrainian civilians are known to be currently detained in Russia and the temporarily occupied Ukrainian territories, although the real figures are likely to be significantly higher; whereas more than 70 000 Ukrainians – including civilians, children, and military personnel – are officially listed as missing;

    I. whereas the Russian authorities have systematically carried out enforced disappearances against large numbers of Ukrainian civilians, detaining individuals with no military affiliation on baseless and fabricated charges, with their fate and whereabouts remaining unknown, leaving their families in agonising uncertainty; whereas enforced disappearances by Russia are part of a widespread, systematic and coordinated assault on Ukraine’s civilian population;

    J. whereas, according to the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, at least 29 civilians have died in custody in Russian detention facilities, and 170 have been executed in areas under Russian control since February 2022;

    K. whereas throughout the process of enforced disappearances, the Russian authorities have consistently failed to inform the families of the fate or location of their loved ones; whereas multiple responses from various authorities have likewise failed to provide any meaningful information;

    L. whereas the Russian authorities have systematically employed torture and other forms of inhumane and degrading treatment against numerous illegally detained Ukrainian civilians; whereas the UN Independent International Commission of Inquiry on Ukraine has found evidence of Russia using rape and sexual violence as means of torture against both male and female detainees;

    M. whereas Russia refuses to disclose the number of Ukrainian prisoners of war (POWs) it currently holds; whereas the Russian authorities are blatantly failing to meet their obligations under the Geneva Conventions to allow international representatives of the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) to visit prisoners and to transmit the relevant information to the ICRC, state authorities and the families of POWs;

    N. whereas Ukrainian POWs and civilian captives are subjected to torture, including starvation, beatings, various types of coercion, physical, sexual and psychological violence and denial of medical care and legal representation;

    O. whereas Ukraine and international bodies have documented hundreds of executions of Ukrainian POWs by Russian forces since February 2022; whereas the Office of the Prosecutor General of Ukraine is investigating the execution of 268 Ukrainian POWs (208 on the battlefield and 59 in the ‘Olenivka’ prison); whereas the increasing number of executions and available evidence suggests that these crimes are not isolated incidents but part of a systematic and deliberate policy, constituting serious violations of international law and human rights, and war crimes under the Geneva Conventions and the Rome Statute;

    P. whereas Ukraine and Russia have conducted 65 prisoner exchanges since February 2022, resulting in the release of 5 757 people, including three large-scale exchanges in May 2025, with an additional 469 individuals released outside formal exchange mechanisms;

    Q. whereas since the occupation and annexation of Crimea in 2014, Russia has systematically targeted Crimean Tatars with politically motivated prosecutions, enforced disappearances, intimidation and harassment; whereas Crimean Tatar leaders, journalists, civil society activists and religious figures have faced disproportionate repression, including under the guise of anti-extremism and anti-terrorism charges; whereas these actions amount to violations of international human rights and humanitarian law and aim to erase the identity and presence of the indigenous Crimean Tatar people;

    R. whereas Russia, while posturing as a defender of the Christian faith and values, has been conducting mass and systematic violations of religious rights in occupied Ukrainian territories, with the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church banned outright, at least 47 Ukrainian religious leaders killed and more subjected to torture, and religious property willingly targeted and destroyed by Russian forces; whereas in parallel Russia weaponises the Orthodox Church of the Moscow Patriarchate as a tool to tyrannise and control religious communities and the Ukrainian population more broadly;

    S. whereas the torture and killing of Ukrainian journalist Viktoriia Roshchyna in Russian captivity highlights the grave and growing dangers faced by Ukrainian journalists held by Russian forces; whereas others, including Iryna Danylovych, Dmytro Khyliuk, Iryna Levchenko and Heorhiy Levchenko, remain in detention under life-threatening conditions;

    T. whereas according to the ‘Bring Kids Back UA’ initiative and the Yale Humanitarian Research Lab (HRL), since February 2022 around at least 20 000 and possibly up to 35 000 Ukrainian children have been forcibly deported to Russia and Belarus or detained in temporarily occupied Ukrainian territories, with only 1 366 returned and 637 confirmed dead; whereas the real figures are assumed to be much higher, as these transfers and deportations continue; whereas the HRL’s Ukraine Conflict Observatory has had its funding cut as of 1 July by the Trump administration, jeopardising the continuation of its work;

    U. whereas the ICC has been conducting an investigation into the situation in Ukraine since 2 March 2022 and on 17 March 2023 issued arrest warrants for Vladimir Putin, President of the Russian Federation, and Maria Lvova-Belova, so-called Commissioner for Children’s Rights in the Office of the President of the Russian Federation, for the war crime of unlawful deportation of Ukrainian children, followed up by additional arrest warrants against Russian officials issued on 24 June 2024; whereas the EU supports the Special Tribunal for the Crime of Aggression that is being established in the framework of the Council of Europe;

    1. Condemns, in the strongest possible terms, Russia’s unprovoked, illegal and unjustified war of aggression against Ukraine; demands that Russia immediately cease all military activities in Ukraine, fully withdraw from Ukraine’s internationally recognised territory, end forced deportations, release all detained and deported Ukrainians and compensate Ukraine and victims of war crimes; reiterates its condemnation of Belarus’s direct involvement in Russia’s brutal war of aggression against Ukraine;

    2. Confirms its unwavering commitment to the independence, sovereignty and territorial integrity of Ukraine, within its internationally recognised borders and reiterates its policy of non-recognition of Ukrainian territories temporarily occupied by Russia; strongly underlines Ukraine’s inherent right to self-defence, in line with Article 51 of the UN Charter, which entails the right to strike military targets on Russian soil;

    3. Reaffirms its unwavering solidarity with the people of Ukraine in their heroic defence of their nation, their land, and our shared European values; reiterates its belief that a strong, independent and democratic Ukraine is vital for Europe’s security, stability and prosperity; calls for the EU and all its 27 Member States to substantially enhance the effectiveness and accelerate the delivery of military support to Ukraine in order to allow Ukraine to legitimately defend itself against Russia’s escalating attacks on cities and civilian infrastructure across the country, and to put Ukraine in the strongest possible position for negotiations;

    4. Condemns Vladimir Putin’s ongoing revisionist and imperialist rhetoric and ideology, and treacherous propaganda; denounces the systematic attempts by the Russian Government to erase Ukraine’s history, culture, language and identity;

    5. Stresses that Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine has shattered peace and stability in Europe and gravely undermined global security; underscores that Russia remains the most significant and direct threat to European security;

    6. Strongly condemns the execution of Ukrainian POWs by Russian forces, constituting war crimes and grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions;

    7. Reiterates that Russia bears sole responsibility for its war of aggression and that there can be no impunity for violations of human rights, war crimes, or other breaches of international law committed by Russian forces and officials; expresses deep outrage at Russia’s brutal attacks on civilians and the indiscriminate targeting of civilian infrastructure; stresses that the systematic and deliberate targeting of civilians and, in particular, the deportation of children may constitute a genocidal strategy orchestrated and executed by the Russian Government;

    8. Fully supports the ICC’s ongoing investigations into the war crimes and crimes against humanity committed by Russia; welcomes the recent agreement between the Council of Europe and Ukraine on the establishment of a Special Tribunal for the Crime of Aggression against Ukraine; emphasises that all those responsible for war crimes perpetrated in Ukraine must be held accountable and stresses that justice is essential for any sustainable peace; expresses its utmost concern about the US sanctions on the ICC and its prosecutors, judges and staff, which undermine all its ongoing investigative and prosecutorial work and constitute a serious attack on the system of international justice; calls on the Commission to urgently activate the Blocking Statute and on the Member States to urgently step up their diplomatic efforts in order to protect and safeguard the ICC as an indispensable cornerstone of the system of international justice;

    9. Reiterates its condemnation of Russia’s forcible deportation, illegal detention and inhumane treatment of countless Ukrainian civilians; demands that Russia immediately provide families with accurate information regarding the whereabouts and state of health of detainees and calls for the immediate release of all the Ukrainian civilians currently held captive by the Russian authorities; underscores that the forced displacement, unlawful detention and mistreatment of Ukrainian civilians exemplify the intrinsic brutality of the Russian regime and its flagrant disregard for human life; strongly condemns the gruesome tactics deployed by the Russian authorities against both Ukrainian civilians and prisoners of war; deplores the wide and systematic use of terror in Ukraine’s occupied territories, aimed at intimidating the civilian population, stifling resistance and political dissent, suppressing civic activism and eradicating the Ukrainian language and national identity;

    10. Condemns the ongoing persecution of Crimean Tatars in illegally occupied Crimea, including politically motivated detentions, torture, enforced disappearances and restrictions on freedom of religion, expression and association; calls for the immediate release of all Crimean Tatars imprisoned on political grounds and urges the EU and international organisations to enhance monitoring and advocacy on behalf of the indigenous people of Crimea;

    11. Urges Russia to immediately agree to and implement a comprehensive ‘all-for-all’ exchange of POWs with Ukraine, in accordance with its obligations under international humanitarian law and the Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War;

    12. Strongly condemns Russia’s violent actions and the complicity of Belarus in the mistreatment of Ukrainian children, including murder, torture and criminal prosecution, forced transfer and deportation, sexual abuse and exploitation, forced Russification and militarisation; denounces the forced imposition of Russian citizenship on deported children and their state-sponsored adoption by Russian families as part of a deliberate policy of forced assimilation; regrets that the EU was unable to help Yale’s HRL secure sufficient funding; calls on its Member States to closely cooperate with and support the Ukrainian authorities and local and international non-governmental organisations in their efforts to document all missing and deported Ukrainian children, determine their whereabouts and repatriate them in order to promptly reunite them with their parents or legal guardians; reiterates that the deportation of Ukrainian children is a grave violation of international humanitarian law, in particular of Article 49 of the Fourth Geneva Convention, and constitutes a war crime; urges the EU to hold those responsible to account and to sanction individuals and entities implicated in these crimes;

    13. Demands that, in line with its obligations under the respective Geneva Conventions, Russia grant the ICRC immediate access to POW camps and other sites where Ukrainian soldiers or civilians are being held captive; notes the marked difference in the way Ukraine and Russia have treated the POWs they hold, with Ukrainian military personnel having been severely tortured, maltreated and malnourished, in violation of the laws of war and international humanitarian law;

    14. Reiterates its call for the EU and its Member States to increase humanitarian and rehabilitation assistance for victims of Russian captivity, including access to medical and psychological care, reintegration services and legal assistance; commends Ukrainian and international civil society organisations for supporting families of abducted Ukrainian children, POWs and illegally detained civilians;

    15. Reaffirms the EU’s steadfast commitment to the reconstruction of Ukraine and reiterates its readiness to contribute to rebuilding Ukraine’s economy and infrastructure; stresses the strategic importance of the Ukraine Facility in reinforcing Ukraine’s resilience, accelerating its recovery, and supporting its path towards sustainable development and EU membership; reiterates its firm conviction that Russia must pay for the massive damage caused in Ukraine and therefore calls for the confiscation of Russian state assets immobilised under EU sanctions or otherwise for their use to support Ukraine’s defence and reconstruction; underlines its conviction that various legal pathways to do so are available and that lack of action is an inexcusable failure on the part of European governments;

    16. Condemns the Russian State Duma’s protocol adopted on 24 June 2025 allowing the member states of the Collective Security Treaty Organization to deploy their troops on the territory of other members in the event of armed conflict, threats, crisis situations and military exercises; condemns this step as a clear attempt by Russia to further scale up its relentless attacks on Ukraine by forcibly mobilising troops from neighbouring and allied states;

    17. Strongly condemns the recruitment and deployment of Cuban soldiers in addition to the involvement of North Korean troops;

    18. Urges all Member States to immediately provide further military assistance and to engage in joint procurement of additional capabilities, in particular air defence, long range strike and artillery systems and ammunition; in that regard, urges all Member States to devote a significant part of their SAFE Defence Investment Plans to assistance for Ukraine; urges the Member States and their defence industries to invest in and partner with the Ukrainian defence industry, including through additional investments and setting up joint ventures, in order to maximise the full potential of its production capabilities to produce critical equipment in the most efficient way;

    19. Recalls the bold statements by several EU Heads of State and Government that Russia’s failure to agree to the US-proposed 30-day ceasefire would be met with severely enhanced sanctions and therefore urges the Council, the Commission and the Member States to follow-up on their declarations and substantially increase the effectiveness and impact of sanctions on Russia; welcomes the seventeenth sanctions package of 20 May 2025 but urges the Member States to adopt the next sanctions package without further delay; underlines that there is a current strategic imperative to act boldly now; stresses that the negative global security and economic consequences of any future Russian aggression far outweigh the military and financial commitment needed today to definitively end Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine, to deter further Russian aggression and achieve a just, fair and lasting peace; resolutely calls on the EU Member States to stop their shameful business as usual approach and instead act with a renewed sense of urgency and purpose;

    20. Believes that in order to pressure Russia to end its war of aggression, beginning with a sustained ceasefire, substantially more effective military, economic, political and diplomatic efforts and measures must be applied by the EU and like-minded partners; calls for all necessary steps to be taken to avoid the circumvention of sanctions, in particular by targeting Russia’s ‘shadow fleet’ vessels; calls for a full ban on Russian liquefied natural gas (LNG), oil and raw materials, and interim measures to minimise Russia’s ability to pay for its war of aggression through energy exports, including a lower oil price cap and the introduction of an LNG price cap; underlines the importance of adopting the 18th sanctions package without further delay; calls on the Member States that are blocking the adoption of the latest sanctions package to follow other Member States, which have successfully found alternative sources for oil and gas deliveries; underlines that it is unacceptable that, in the fourth year of Russia’s full-scale war against Ukraine, Russian missiles and unmanned aerial vehicles used in attacks continue to rely heavily on Western-manufactured components;

    21. Recalls that the overall support for Ukraine must be sufficient to stop Russia’s war of aggression and allow Ukraine to liberate all its people, re-establish full control over its territory within its internationally recognised borders and deter any further aggression by Russia; recalls that Europe has already supported Ukraine with EUR 50 billion in military aid, but underlines that further assistance is required and that such support now depends largely on Europe itself; urges the Member States to provide more arms and ammunition to Ukraine before any negotiations are concluded; denounces any attempts to pressure Ukraine to cede occupied territory, in which the population is exposed to continued repression, violence, forced disappearances, illegal detentions, deportations and other forms of systematic terror;

    22. Calls on the EU to impose personal sanctions against Russian officials responsible for violence and torture against imprisoned and detained Ukrainians;

    23. Expresses its full support for a just and lasting peace in Ukraine, based on terms determined by Ukraine and acceptable to its people; stresses that any agreement must uphold Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity, prevent Russia from rearming and guarantee Ukraine’s long-term security; insists on accountability for war crimes and on reparations; underlines that peace negotiations must be preceded by an unconditional ceasefire;

    24. Stresses that in the light of the shift in the US stance on Russia’s war of aggression, the EU and its Member States must remain Ukraine’s primary strategic allies and should reinforce their leadership role in supporting Ukraine’s struggle for sovereignty, peace and justice; calls for the EU and its Member States to work towards maintaining the broadest possible international support for Ukraine, including through building coalitions with like-minded non-EU partners;

    25. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, the Council, the Commission, the governments and parliaments of the Member States, the Council of Europe, the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, the President, Government and Parliament of Ukraine, and to the authorities of Russia and Belarus.

     

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Appointment of Filippo Ferri as head of Monza and Brianza Police – E-002590/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002590/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Ilaria Salis (The Left), Mimmo Lucano (The Left), Benedetta Scuderi (Verts/ALE), Cristina Guarda (Verts/ALE)

    Filippo Ferri was recently appointed head of the Monza and Brianza State Police, despite receiving a final sentence in 2012 for aggravated forgery in relation to the violent raid on the Diaz school during the G8 meeting in Genoa in 2001.

    This appointment raises questions about the effectiveness of accountability mechanisms for officials involved in serious human rights violations and the implications for the credibility of democratic institutions.

    In view of its role in ensuring compliance with Article 2 TEU and in accordance with the European Code of Police Ethics:

    • 1.Does the Commission consider it compatible with EU standards on the rule of law and the protection of fundamental rights to assign individuals convicted of abuses of power and serious human rights violations to top roles in law enforcement agencies?
    • 2.Does it intend to push for the introduction, at national or European level, of enhanced integrity and ethical verification procedures for appointments to senior security forces, including binding or advisory opinions from independent human rights bodies?

    Submitted: 26.6.2025

    Last updated: 4 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Public procurement: when Brussels finances a company penalised for dumping – E-002587/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002587/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Virginie Joron (PfE)

    In 2016, the Commission imposed a definitive anti-dumping duty of 4 % on imports of tubes and pipes of ductile cast iron originating in India. On 22 November 2023, Ursula von der Leyen and her administration decided to impose anti-dumping duties of 16 % on Electrosteel. According to the Commission, this Indian company has a 30 % share of the water pipe market in France and benefits from export subsidies of 6 % at home[1].

    The Commission found evidence that the weight of the goods had been misreported. Despite the fact that correct reporting of weights is essential to ensure that dumping margins are accurately calculated, the Commission has refused to check the previous imports for possible fraud and recover any duties not collected since 2016.

    • 1.By underreporting the weight of its pipes, the company evaded the duties it should have paid. Why has the Commission refused to carry out an investigation and recover the cost of this fraud?
    • 2.One project in Isère – funded by Brussels and the Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes Region, and valued at EUR 8 million – has purchased pipes from this non-EU company[2]. Why is the Commission financing a non-EU company that has committed subsidy fraud and that it has penalised for dumping?
    • 3.Why does the Commission not prohibit, in EU public procurement, purchases of products from non-EU companies found to have engaged in dumping or fraud?

    Submitted: 26.6.2025

    • [1] Recitals 4, 80, 168, 209 and 233 of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/2605 of 22 November 2023: countervailing duty of 9 % and anti-dumping duty of 7 %, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/FR/TXT/PDF/?uri=OJ:L_202302605.
    • [2] Albenc – https://caeau.fr/creation-du-reseau-d-irrigation-asl-d-irrigation-de-l-albenc-38; https://www.linkedin.com/posts/cabinet-ca-eau_retour-sur-le-projet-dirrigation-des-terres-activity-7155144143210446848-X7rJ/?originalSubdomain=fr.
    Last updated: 4 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Self-care facilities for persons with disabilities – E-002588/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002588/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Loucas Fourlas (PPE)

    The autonomy of persons with disabilities is fundamental to social inclusion and equality. Nevertheless, many persons with disabilities continue to face daily barriers to accessing technological tools and services that could enhance their self-care and reduce their dependency on others. In several Member States there are delays in the provision of relevant allowances, poor awareness and/or a lack of harmonised strategies to facilitate the autonomy of persons with disabilities.

    Given that independent living is an objective of the EU strategy for the rights of persons with disabilities 2021-2030, will the Commission say:

    • 1.What measures does it intend to take to enhance persons with disabilities’ access to self-care technologies?
    • 2.Is there any plan to create a European mechanism to co-finance or subsidise such solutions?
    • 3.How is fair treatment and equal access for persons with severe disabilities guaranteed in the Member States?

    Submitted: 26.6.2025

    Last updated: 4 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Proportion of college and university students focusing on STEM subjects – E-002581/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002581/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Barbara Bonte (PfE)

    The proportion of college and university students choosing STEM subjects is a good indicator of future innovativeness.

    • 1.How has this proportion evolved in the EU in recent years?
    • 2.How does the EU compare to its biggest economic rivals, namely China and the United States, in this respect?
    • 3.How does the Commission explain this evolution?

    Submitted: 26.6.2025

    Last updated: 4 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News